piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-26 23:42:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 99888025, 99888133, 99888266, 99888387, 99888509, 99888640, 99888762, 99888872, 99888980, 99889091, 99889189, 99889330, 99889452, 99889571, 99889689, 99889809, 99889923, 99890030, 99890160, 99890287, 99890414, 99890520, 99890649, 99890766, 99890892, 99891019, 99891139, 99891263, 99891373, 99891483, 99891616, 99891728, 99891858, 99891997, 99892132, 99892231, 99892356, 99892476, 99892617, 99892744, 99892867, 99892989, 99893128, 99893266, 99893379, 99893493, 99893622, 99893737, 99893844, 99893954, 99894080, 99894206, 99894320, 99894431, 99894571, 99894694, 99894812, 99894929, 99895056, 99895164, 99895305, 99895433, 99895545, 99895683, 99895801, 99895922, 99896011, 99896088, 99896173, 99896268, 99896362, 99896463, 99896570, 99896663, 99896762, 99896846, 99896940, 99897030, 99897126, 99897241, 99897343, 99897446, 99897545, 99897635, 99897740, 99897828, 99897910, 99898001, 99898113, 99898199, 99898283, 99898396, 99898500, 99898598, 99898705, 99898790, 99898888, 99898971, 99899054, 99899138.
eggie (2021-02-24 20:47:13+00:00): Wanner je access=no tagt  (verboden toegang)  rendert je pad nauwelijks op de kaart. Staat hier een bord Verboden toegang.
Plakken aan landuse kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken bij intekeken. 
Je hebt het later proberen te verbeteren, maar toen de landuse farmland meegenomen. 
Best lastig in het begin. 
gr eggie
eggie (2021-02-24 21:01:27+00:00): Aangepast.. Gewoon doormappen en niet de moed opgeven :)
Wulf4096 (2021-02-24 19:58:24+00:00): Hallo!

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99927819 könnte etwas helfen.

Ja, es ist alles richtig verbunden.

"segregated=yes" auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910585300 macht aus meiner Sicht keinen Sinn. Mit dem Tag wird angegeben, ob auf einem Fuß+Radweg eine Trennung zwischen Fuß- und Radverkehr besteht.
josch1885 (2021-02-24 20:03:57+00:00): Super. Danke für den Tipp mit segregated, das nehme ich noch raus.
eggie (2021-02-24 20:34:35+00:00): Dag mustinherit

In OSM worden periodiek de gebouwen geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG  (Kadaster)  Je kunt dit bespoedigen door een verzoek te doen op het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. We tekenen dus niet zelf in... overigens wel netjes gedaan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-24 20:37:30+00:00): Even als voorbeeld aangevraagd
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=820080#p820080
gr eggie
mustinherit (2021-02-25 09:21:25+00:00): Oke, duidelijk.
E de Wit (2021-02-25 22:26:59+00:00): Is bij deze geïmporteerd

-E de Wit
eggie (2021-02-24 20:39:27+00:00): Best lastig om alle ins en outs te leren kennen in het begin. Geen adressen op de gebouwomtrek. bedrijven uitsluitend op de adresnode bijtaggen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-24 20:41:00+00:00): Info naar adresnode verplaatst.
gr eggie
mustinherit (2021-02-25 09:22:42+00:00): Top, ook duidelijk.
eggie (2021-02-24 20:44:36+00:00): Dag Artjen.. Hier heb je de landuse farmland vastgeplakt aan de Zenderensestraat.
Verder heb je het pad op slot gezet met access=no  Beter nooit beginnen met access=no Het is bijna altijd fout.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99928295

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-24 20:56:45+00:00): Pad losgemaakt van landuse
Puxan (2021-02-26 19:04:32+00:00): Hola @Evamore, 
Creo que lo que has marcado como framland no se ajusta a la descripción que se hace en openstreetmap:   https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland        .
quedan 3 edificios sin escuadrar.     
Muy bien, sigue mapeando.     Joaquim
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99928396
Pawcio (2021-07-01 19:31:49+00:00): Hi
Why have you deleted the viewpoint at the top of the North East Buttress ridge?
Pawcio (2021-07-01 19:33:10+00:00): here it was https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99928652#map=19/56.79766/-4.99957
mapbear66 (2021-07-01 20:33:24+00:00): Hi,
Looking at it, I think a tourism=viewpoint there would be somewhere I wouldn't want to encourage inexperienced people to go to. It's off the main cairned path in a relatively precarious position.
Do you have strong views about it?
Pawcio (2021-07-02 07:14:57+00:00): Getting there requires boulder hopping so people with balance problems or in precarious conditions like ice or iced snow should find out fast it would be a bad idea to get there. Edges are not more precarious than at the main path, although I'm surprised that there are no railings at so popular mountain. I would put them at a few viewpoints to encourage people. Looking at the Walk Highland rating Ben Navis is highly undervalued I guess by people sticking only to the main path. 

I found quite good correlations between the rating and the steepness of the steepest slopes of the mountain and approximations of its size and the Ben Navis is the biggest outlier - it is the black dot at right: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lXp_ZUSuLMExsSQNmctlaSiLQVkUX8lG/view from my unfinished page https://sites.google.com/site/europeanpeaks/home .

For me, it was the best part of the whole hike - one of the best hikes while the top was only good.
mapbear66 (2021-07-03 06:54:51+00:00): Railings?! No. That is so counter to our mountain culture.  We don't paint trail blazes everywhere. Where there's a real problem we'll put up cairns to guide tourists across a problematic area, like the plateau of the Ben, where tourists will try to go anyway. But similarly we don't do anything to encourage those people away from the safe area. Like putting in viewpoint symbols on our maps. The Ben is covered in cloud for the vast majority of the year with only 30 to 60 days clear. It's also covered in 6ft of snow with huge cornices above those north and NE crags, buttresses and gullies well into summer and the tourist season. So we encourage people to stick to the path and not draw them to the edges. So please don't put viewpoints everywhere. It may seem attractive, but it's not good practise in this country. Thanks.
Pawcio (2021-07-03 12:59:50+00:00): Good point about cornices, I haven't thought about this, although I was there on 27.06 and there was no snow at this viewpoint when there was a big patch on the main path and some below cliff edges.
Once on the Stob Dubh at Glen Coe I met about 4 pairs of not native English speakers, mainly Dutch, and maybe 2 pairs of English speakers on a beautiful day 80 miles from 2 million Glasgow conurbation, so it seems to me your mountain culture isn't very good for and liked by your people by not making it easier. Much less rewarding hikes, than it could be, of one the most popular mountain contribute to it. It could be good to learn something from more advanced cultures like in the Alps. So, except for less rewarding and less safe hiking, what is the value of not having railings?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-26 23:42:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 99888025, 99888133, 99888266, 99888387, 99888509, 99888640, 99888762, 99888872, 99888980, 99889091, 99889189, 99889330, 99889452, 99889571, 99889689, 99889809, 99889923, 99890030, 99890160, 99890287, 99890414, 99890520, 99890649, 99890766, 99890892, 99891019, 99891139, 99891263, 99891373, 99891483, 99891616, 99891728, 99891858, 99891997, 99892132, 99892231, 99892356, 99892476, 99892617, 99892744, 99892867, 99892989, 99893128, 99893266, 99893379, 99893493, 99893622, 99893737, 99893844, 99893954, 99894080, 99894206, 99894320, 99894431, 99894571, 99894694, 99894812, 99894929, 99895056, 99895164, 99895305, 99895433, 99895545, 99895683, 99895801, 99895922, 99896011, 99896088, 99896173, 99896268, 99896362, 99896463, 99896570, 99896663, 99896762, 99896846, 99896940, 99897030, 99897126, 99897241, 99897343, 99897446, 99897545, 99897635, 99897740, 99897828, 99897910, 99898001, 99898113, 99898199, 99898283, 99898396, 99898500, 99898598, 99898705, 99898790, 99898888, 99898971, 99899054, 99899138.
flohoff (2021-02-25 16:10:09+00:00): Moin,
wegen dem Bau auf der Möllberger Straße. Dafür gibts das "construction=tertiary" "highway=construction" thema - Dann wird das in der Karte prominenter gerendert das das nicht befahrbar ist.

Flo
hd_m (2021-02-25 19:37:40+00:00): Vielen Dank für's Review.
Hatte hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction gelesen, dass man das erst ab 6 bis 9 Monaten Bauzeit machen sollte.
Ich finde "Baustelle" schon besser.
eggie (2021-02-24 20:49:13+00:00): Hi ganeshbabudotme
Please don't add address to buildingshapes in the Netherlands. 
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-02-24 20:52:15+00:00): Removed addressinfo
ganeshbabudotme (2021-02-24 21:52:35+00:00): Hi eggie,

Noted, won't add.
May I know the reason though?
eggie (2021-02-24 22:20:02+00:00): Hi.. 
In osm the Netherlands all buildings incl. Addressnodes are import from the Dutch Kadaster.
We have consensus in the Dutch OSM community  not adding addressinfo at the buildingshapes.
Greetz

Eggie
ganeshbabudotme (2021-02-24 22:35:28+00:00): Alright, got it. Thanks for the clarification.

regards,
GB
habi (2021-02-25 14:44:13+00:00): I corrected a typo in your tags (from liesure to leisure): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99984187
Bill Inskeep (2021-02-28 21:12:54+00:00): Thanks!
mueschel (2021-02-26 12:49:03+00:00): Hi,
please check the keys in your edits. It's 'motor_vehicle', not 'motorvehicle'.

Thanks!
Willem Altes (2021-02-26 17:15:32+00:00): Thanks for the remark. Tags are changed.
joost schouppe (2021-05-18 13:49:15+00:00): Bedankt, ziet er goed uit!
datendelphin (2021-02-25 19:17:29+00:00): Das mit dem layer kann nicht die richtige Lösung sein. Der ist für Brücken und tunnels, die heir aber nicht involviert scheinen. Ich fürchte der iD mit seinen unbeholfenen Warnungen hat dich da auf eine falsche Fährte geführt. Die beiden Gebäude überlappen sich ganz leicht. Das ist meiner Meinung nach egal. Aber falls du die Warnung richtig los werden möchtest, musst du einfach die zwei gedoppelten Knoten mergen, und die zwei Knoten, die nur auf einem der sich berührenden Umrisse sind in den anderen einfügen. Hab ich hier gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99929528

Grüsse
Michael
huerlisi (2021-02-26 08:03:36+00:00): Alles klar, merci Michael.

Werde ich in Kürze fixen.
JeroenHoek (2022-08-26 19:21:32+00:00): Hello,

According to TagInfo you've used 'maxweight:conditional=none @ distination' about a 100 times all within Belgium.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/maxweight%3Aconditional=none%20%40%20distination

Unfortunately… 'distination' is misspelt. You probably want 'destination'.
vjyblauw (2022-08-27 07:31:04+00:00): done, thanks for yhe information
eggie (2021-02-24 21:04:11+00:00): Welkocome 周育如  to OSM..
What is your intention here.
natural=wood in a building?
name=empty farm land-1?

All your edits are realy in OSM  now.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-02-24 21:07:14+00:00): reverted by changeset  #99930802
GinaroZ (2021-03-04 00:27:56+00:00): Unfortunately I've had to revert these changes, as well as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99930244 - you disconnected the paths from the roundabout and misaligned the paths.

The Bing imagery seems to be out of alignment so before editing please use the "imagery offset" tool in the background options to align the Bing imagery to the OSM data. Thanks :)
scianana (2021-03-04 09:12:24+00:00): Oh... I see, thanks for this! Yep, I just dragged the path to the image, didn't know that there is an option to do it in reverse! Thanks
scianana (2021-03-04 09:17:26+00:00): I have one more question. I disconnected the footpath from the roundabout because they are not physically connected. If you come with a bike from any of the paths, you get on the sidewalk surrounding the roundabout (where cars can go) and have to cycle a bit around until you get down to the road. Doesn't this mean that the paths and the roundabout road are not connected? Am I missing something in terms of mapping conventions or style?
GinaroZ (2021-03-07 18:41:13+00:00): The convention is basically - connectivity is slightly more important than absolute accurary. Otherwise if roads/paths are not connected then routing apps cannot direct people where to go.

Since most places have no pavement mapped separately, paths just connect directly to the road. But feel free to adjust where the paths join - just make sure they are connected :)
scianana (2021-03-08 09:36:56+00:00): Got it, thanks again :)
4b696d (2021-03-02 22:06:42+00:00): Moin, du hast hier eine Menge doppelt eingetragen. Ich habe das mal bereinigt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-26 23:42:40+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 99888025, 99888133, 99888266, 99888387, 99888509, 99888640, 99888762, 99888872, 99888980, 99889091, 99889189, 99889330, 99889452, 99889571, 99889689, 99889809, 99889923, 99890030, 99890160, 99890287, 99890414, 99890520, 99890649, 99890766, 99890892, 99891019, 99891139, 99891263, 99891373, 99891483, 99891616, 99891728, 99891858, 99891997, 99892132, 99892231, 99892356, 99892476, 99892617, 99892744, 99892867, 99892989, 99893128, 99893266, 99893379, 99893493, 99893622, 99893737, 99893844, 99893954, 99894080, 99894206, 99894320, 99894431, 99894571, 99894694, 99894812, 99894929, 99895056, 99895164, 99895305, 99895433, 99895545, 99895683, 99895801, 99895922, 99896011, 99896088, 99896173, 99896268, 99896362, 99896463, 99896570, 99896663, 99896762, 99896846, 99896940, 99897030, 99897126, 99897241, 99897343, 99897446, 99897545, 99897635, 99897740, 99897828, 99897910, 99898001, 99898113, 99898199, 99898283, 99898396, 99898500, 99898598, 99898705, 99898790, 99898888, 99898971, 99899054, 99899138.
literan (2021-02-25 15:57:02+00:00): на footway по умолчанию нет движения моторизированного транспорта. Бессмысленная правка, все равно что foot=yes на магазины вешать. Откачу.
nevw (2021-02-25 06:26:31+00:00): Hi
it looks fine to me. You don't need to join each of the segments in to one line, but each segment must be joined to the next and the direction of the lines must flow downhill toward the outlet. Often streams and rivers are split in to more than one segment if the tags change. eg if a section is tagged as intermittent.

This site can be used to find errors in waterways
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=water&lon=152.34929&lat=-28.89164&zoom=11
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-24 22:45:38+00:00): Hello! Welcome to OSM, help is welcomed!

Relation editing is quite complicated of all things done in OSM and this relation appears to be quite complex.

If you need help, feel free to ask here (though likely only I will notice) or better at

- talk-us mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
- https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ - USA Slack channel
- Global Discord channel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Discord

or one of other communication channels: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels
user_5359 (2021-02-26 06:23:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910615604: What is the meaning of the key j3?
sgiles76 (2021-03-03 15:55:51+00:00): OK I finally found my way to the discussion. I am not sure what is meant by j3?
user_5359 (2021-03-03 18:27:45+00:00): Great and again Welcome: Did you follow the link to the example way? You   create a way with a key j3: simple question: What is your understanding of this key?
flohoff (2021-02-25 15:49:35+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier an der Trauerhalle den name mal in die description verschoben. Das name tag ist für EIgennamen nicht für Beschreibendes. Also Hans, Peter oder Martin-Schleyer Halle. Hier ist das ja die Beschreibung. Das steckt aber schon in dem funeral_hall drin.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99931715
M!dgard (2021-02-25 17:18:14+00:00): De wijziging aan de Evendijk West is teruggedraaid in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99993606 .
M!dgard (2021-02-25 17:47:44+00:00): Een incorrect gebouw is verwijderd in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99993749 .
M!dgard (2021-02-25 17:49:03+00:00): Is de opsplitsing van de Copsweg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910619727 ) nuttig voor een bepaalde applicatie? Of waarom anders? De twee helften zijn namelijk gelijk op de gemeente waarin ze liggen na.
chlenix (2021-02-25 07:46:02+00:00): Ваши правки - вандализм. Прекратите так делать
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99932259
chlenix (2021-02-25 07:49:02+00:00): Правка отменена: 99955944
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99932259
alrik (2021-02-25 07:19:36+00:00): Wie kann ich diesen Änderungssatz wieder löschen? Habe einen Fehler gemacht und mich im Gebäude geirrt.
alrik (2021-02-25 07:28:20+00:00): Okay, ist nun wieder gelöscht.
carfog81 (2021-02-26 16:49:07+00:00): Is "Colombia" not " Columbia"
Best regards!
emvee (2023-04-01 09:44:12+00:00): Hoi,

Ik was aan het kijken waarom mij fietsrouteplanner me niet meer over de trappen van de Zwijndrechtse brug stuurde en kwam op ramp:bicycle=automatic, dat wordt niet als "ramp:bicycle=yes/both/left/right" herkend.

Eens wat rondgekeken, o.a. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ramp:bicycle#values en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:ramp&diff=2117335&oldid=2048230

Ik vraag me af of ramp:bicycle=automatic wel z'n goed idee is, I denk een aparte tag als ramp:bicycle:system=VeloComfort een beter idee is.
Luca Moiana (2021-02-25 10:13:21+00:00): Non si tratta di un toponimo, perciò il rimboschimento non dovrebbe avere nome
impiaaa (2021-04-23 00:22:33+00:00): This is not a bicycle path, it is a bike lane, which is already mapped with the "cycleway=lane" tag on the main roadway.
lonnez (2021-12-07 05:05:29+00:00): Hey. Last time I was here, I definitely saw cars on the roads here. Did you mean to put this for just part of the road? Or perhaps a faulty source?
jim72324 (2021-12-16 17:27:54+00:00): Sorry for the slow response. I think this is a faulty source. Someone told me cars were not allowed and sent me this link with the rules: https://www.sandiego.gov/park-and-recreation/parks/osp/blackmtn/rules

But that looks like a nearby park.  I'll undo this change.
lonnez (2021-12-16 17:41:35+00:00): If I remember right, I think I updated it to allow cars already. Though let me know if I missed a spot.
mariotomo (2021-02-24 23:07:45+00:00): hi.  thank you for contributing to the map.  you have an instructor to help / review?  or you would like some assistance?
Salaml (2021-02-24 22:39:48+00:00): I forgot to add source=survey
fiscal (2021-02-28 10:28:15+00:00): Hi Shashank,
don't they learn to straighten buildings (press key "Q") at Amazon?
MikeN (2021-02-28 11:33:00+00:00): Hi fiscal,
  Does the straighten buildings function properly handle the 45 degree corner in the upper left?
Allison P (2021-03-01 02:32:10+00:00): No need for snark, fiscal — though Amazon edits are generally not of great quality, that's on the company for not properly training employees.

MikeN, I had no trouble cleaning up the building shape using the orthogonalize shape tool in iD. I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100163466.
Shashank Saraogi (2021-03-02 07:34:20+00:00): Hi All,

Thanks for the feedback and fixing the building outline. I was not completely familiar with the editing process and experimented on adding building information. Going forward I will make sure to orthogonalize the building outlines before saving them to OSM.

Regards,
Shashank
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-02-26 15:10:39+00:00): Hi. Thanks for the contribution! Consider synchronising StreetComplete before traveling long distance: your changeset contains changes both in Spain and Sweden, and they could have been grouped into two different changesets (otherwise it makes the change difficult to review). Thanks in advance!
DaCor (2021-02-24 23:06:54+00:00): Hi, I edited the name for this from Nuns Cross is Church to Nuns Cross Church. 

Dave
etgg (2021-03-18 18:36:15+00:00): Hi, A number of the gardens you have created within this changset have duplicate fences sitting on top of each other which makes them appear much darker then they should be when they are rendered. Please take them off the garden definition and create them as seperate elements to avoid this happening. Thanks.
mariotomo (2021-02-25 00:48:56+00:00): hi.  …  why "residential"?  there's a few scattered buildings along the road, but "residential"?  you're more than welcome editing the road, making it better follow the available photo imagery, which is currently quite poor.  ;-)
(I would classify this as 'unclassified' or leave to locals decide whether to promote it to 'tertiary', but please not 'residential'.  thanks!!!)
Canyonsrcool (2021-02-25 01:29:38+00:00): I decided residential because of all the homes along the road to where it ends and because it comes from other residential roads as well.  Unclassified would work too.
slgidley (2021-04-07 17:50:06+00:00): This change set should be reversed. There is no evidence these roads exist or construction is occurring. NAIP imagery show forested areas and open fields. Most current NC imagery shows same. No sources given.
slgidley (2021-04-07 17:45:13+00:00): This change set should be reversed. There is no evidence these roads exist or construction is occurring. NAIP imagery show open field. Most current NC imagery shows open field. No sources given.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 11:06:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103098305 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits that have been marked as such in the USA - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4832 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12713263 .
mirror176 (2021-02-26 18:33:02+00:00): I usually leave things like 'name' as is if the building still has it as retained signage until that is gone. Contacts direct people to website for how to reach out to the company for final things like customers picking up equipment being repaired or vendors getting product back which would still lead them to the location for now. Otherwise technically the phones may have had people talk to a call center elsewhere and website was not hosted locally for each store so those were really often redirects previously. Thanks for the edit!
Minh Nguyen (2021-02-26 21:25:09+00:00): Thanks for taking a look. I see your point, but I’m hesitant to tag ghost signs with the name key because a data consumer could look at the combination of that key and addr:housenumber or shop (as in shop=vacant) and make it look too much like a shop by the name Fry’s. If I were to add a name, it would be to the effect of “Former Fry’s”; I’ve done that on occasion to brownfields that are commonly referred to by their former uses.

My understanding is that, due to the pandemic, these store closings are more abrupt than they normally would be. If there were a liquidation sale or service-only period, it might make sense to keep tagging them as shop=electronics but set opening_hours=closed. I may be wrong though.
mirror176 (2021-02-27 00:59:21+00:00): I set opening_hours=closed (better than disused:opening_hours=... as they are not open to general public; guess I could have put 9-17 as I've overheard from phoenix, az employees doing final closing steps and some strict access= terms, but why try that hard for a short term tag) and changed shop=electronics to disused:shop=electronics myself on a # of them (all completed now?). Other tags 'could' be removed. I kept the name as I am not aware of the building names being removed in reality just as I didn't delete the building since it still physically stands. I left the name on the bowling alley near the Phoenix Fry's Electronics after I removed the other use tags as the vacant building still has signs on it while I have removed it form others I found closed with remnants such as discolored paint being the clue of what name was previously on it. Wish there was a more formal agreed time to say when the nonphysical stuff should go away (phone, website, wikidata, etc.) but nonphysical things on a map of physical things makes for weird questions.