piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
frosm (2017-10-31 17:06:35+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu sur osm !

il manque l'info que c'est un chemin highway=path
je vous invite a faire le tutoriel bien pratique pour découvrir les bases de fonctionnement
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-01 16:55:44+00:00): This is totally redundant tagging and is not the first time you do it. why?
Moovit Team (2017-11-21 13:09:53+00:00): I'm not sure I fully understand. can you please clarify?
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-21 13:22:54+00:00): As with other changeset comments, I was probably talking about access=no combines with foot=yes. It seems I've fixed this one since then.
Moovit Team (2017-11-21 14:30:53+00:00): Ok, Thanks.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-31 17:24:01+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 53395387, 53395436, 53395596, 53395696, 53395793, 53396072, 53396125, 53396160, 53396233, 53396273, 53396301.
user_5359 (2017-10-31 19:52:17+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Hast Du das Gebäude osm.org/way/283444055 „Bürgerzentrum“ gesehen? Müsste nicht Dein Punkt in diese Gebäude verschoben werden?
eggie (2017-11-03 12:33:45+00:00): Jep... die ref hoort er niet op.
HubMiner (2017-11-02 19:11:58+00:00): The changeset is too big to guess: what are you specifically asking to review?
naoliv (2017-11-01 10:18:37+00:00): Rodolfo, bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap.
Apenas um detalhe nessa sua edição: você acabou deixando o nome do Monte Castelo tudo em minúsculo.
Nomes próprios devem ser representados com letras maiúsculas na primeira letra.
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-10-31 22:20:45+00:00): Why have you moved Monkton Road Pharmacy from its correct location to Healey Grove?
SomeoneElse (2017-11-06 20:31:42+00:00): For info - I've moved Monkton Road Pharmacy back to Monkton Road (accidental node drag I guess).  Currently looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53378694 .
SomeoneElse (2017-11-06 20:37:24+00:00): OK, that's now done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53565633 .  Elm Park Way is now back in the land of the living :)
andygol (2017-11-06 21:06:05+00:00): Доброго дня!
Вітаю в ОСМ. Дякую за ваш внесок в розбудову даних. Нажаль, з першого разу у вас вийшло не зовсім добре, але помилки яких ви припустились, я виправив. Про те як позначати час роботи можна почитати тут - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours. Якщо у вас будуть якісь питання можете звертатись до мене через ОСМ-повідомлення.

З повагою

Andygol
PT-53 (2017-11-03 12:42:59+00:00): Hallo felkel1982,
Du hast die Poststraße in Aulendorf (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8609847) in Deinem CS # 49505126  auf Construction gesetzt und diesem CS dann wieder freigegeben.
Wie ich heute gesehen habe, ist die Straße aber noch gar nicht ganz fertig und von Süden her nur bis zum Rewe-Parkplatz befahrbar.
Wenn Du schon Baustellen in OSM einträgst, dann bitte aber auch richtig!
GerardH2 (2017-10-31 18:38:06+00:00): Volgens mij zit de sloot aan een lijn vast. Hoe maak je die los?
eggie (2017-10-31 19:19:33+00:00): Editor iD is een kleine ramp. Volgens mij kun je rechts op die node klikken en dan gaat een menubox open.

In editor JOSM gebruik ik de G-toets. In editor potlatch2 verwijdig ik gewoon de hele node met shift-DEL
Dit was je edit http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53403842
''k Zie op het oog niets vast zitten in achavi.
eggie (2017-10-31 19:25:19+00:00): Ja op dat hoek je zit het bos vast. Ik maak dan meestal een node er naast op de way van het bos en verwijder gewoon de node. iD heeft ook ergens in het menu twee handjes uit elkaar. Dat is losmaken.
Een duiker hoor je te taggen met tunnel=culvert  en layer=-1
Zal eens kijken hoe je met iD iets losmaakt. Eigenlijk wil ik het niet eens weten. Wil je echt iets gaan doen met OSM schakel dat zo snel mogelijk over op JOSM
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2017-10-31 19:29:18+00:00): Nou... hoekje zat gewoon los, maar het inderdaad rechts klikken en dan die pijltjes die van elkaar gaan.
eggie (2017-10-31 19:42:58+00:00): sloot aan het bos.. inderdaad. Dus ook selecteer node... rechts klikken en dan losmaken kiezen. ...de pijltjes uit elkaar.. Doe je het zelf?
Andrea Musuruane (2017-12-27 10:25:35+00:00): Ciao, addr:unit serve per indicare l'interno. Ciao, Andrea
Lesovichok (2017-12-20 18:07:07+00:00): Вот эта улица в 2016-м была импровизированной гравийкой с сильным уклоном. Туда на легковушке-то не сунешься. Откуда информация, что это продолжение Дворцового шоссе?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130116669
zstadler (2017-11-05 06:03:35+00:00): Hi,

According to 
.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=34.60154&lat=31.65901&zoom=17&opacity=0.67&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
.
in this edit you have created a self-intersecting way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537233411
.
It probably means that part of this proposed way is a bridge.

Would you be able to fix it. or would you prefer me to simply split it into two ways?

Thanks!
Mr Massri (2017-11-07 17:52:54+00:00): It proposed to be bridge. I'll fix it.
zstadler (2017-11-08 14:05:11+00:00): Thanks for the fix.
I've removed the descriptive "Untitled Path" name tags.
johsin18 (2017-11-06 21:26:36+00:00): Hallo Grincs89,
du hast an dieser Stelle die Eigenschaft "Bibliothek" entfernt. Hat das einen guten Grund?  Ist an dieser Stelle keine Bibliothek mehr?
Freundliche Grüsse,
johsin18
andygol (2017-11-06 21:30:05+00:00): Доброго дня! Дякую за ваш внесок в ОСМ.
Ваші правки були переглянуті та виправлені відповідно до https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:communication%3Dline. Дотримуйтесь, будь ласка, наведеної схеми теґування ліній зв'язку.

З повагою

Andygol
Glassman (2017-11-01 03:19:39+00:00): I think you wanted to just add a node, since the business doesn't occupy the entire building. I deleted the duplicate building and moved the tags to a new node. I did change the building to a commercial building.
cadsauxk (2017-10-31 23:11:33+00:00): Oi Colega 

por favor não repita o código da rodovia no campo do nome

por favor também procure manter a formatação adotada no OSM-Brasil que é LMG-887 e não LMG887 (sem hífen)

e afinal é LMG-855 ou LMG-887?

abraço
jkowar (2017-11-17 14:23:09+00:00): Hallo Pirolina, die »Schranke« befindet ein Stück weiter westlich, genau da, wo beidseitig des Weges Wald ist.
VG, JK
jkowar (2017-11-17 14:23:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5202904266
Pirolina (2017-11-17 16:17:39+00:00): Danke, hab es geändert.
eggie (2017-10-31 20:23:22+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-10-31 20:28:07+00:00): De info heb ik even samengevoegd met de BAG-adresnode.. dan is info gekoppeld aan het adres.
geodreieck4711 (2017-11-07 06:51:07+00:00): Unkommentierte Beiträge, keine oder falsche Quellenangabe. Die von dir eingezeichnenten neuen Straßen und Gebäude sind weder auf Bing noch auf Bayern80cm-Luftbildern zu sehen. Hier sollte zumindest ein "survey" oder als Quelle GPS eingetragen werden.....
HubMiner (2017-11-02 19:11:00+00:00): Please add shop=mobile_phone (or anything else), as well as general contact info: phone, website, hours, etc.  Move text from changeset to "description",
GerdP (2017-11-06 08:38:56+00:00): Moin!
Was ist denn mit highway=duckboards
gemeint? Nach meinem Verständnis sollte es highway=path sein, denn das ist die Bedeutung des Weges. Wenn duckboards für Laufbohlen steht, dann kann man das evtl. mit surface=wood erfassen?
Aeroid (2018-05-11 10:12:22+00:00): Das Teilstück auf Scharhöern ist ein Bohlenweg auf kleinen Pflöcken um die Vegation darunter zu ermöglichen. Was wären denn sonst Duckboards?
GerdP (2018-05-11 10:20:04+00:00): Ich habe den Begriff vorher nicht gekannt. Die Frage ist aber, waruim Du nicht das übliche highway=path oder evtl. highway=footway verwendest.
HubMiner (2017-11-02 19:08:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM editing!  Unfortunately, using Google Maps for reference is a big no-no, this will likely trigger copyright violation.  If possible survey this in person, and re-edit, removing all google references.  Feel free to ask any question.  OSM forums are very helpful.  Best regards!
RoterEmil (2017-11-02 07:03:05+00:00): Hallo, damit Hausnummern bei OSM sinnvoll ausgelesen werden können, bitte diese richtig eintragen! Siehe bereits diesen Kommentar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47618684. Danke sehr
JJIglesias (2017-11-01 01:38:50+00:00): Saludos Enrique.Gracias por editar en #OSM_BO, por el registro de Poblaciones del INE este Hamlet se llama oficialmente CANTO ÑUJCHU en Chuquisaca y tiene una poblacion de 176 habitantes. De acuerdo con el  trabajo q estamos haciendo en #PoblacionesBolivia, estamos actualizando todos los "Villages" que tienen mas de 200 habitantes
arvdk (2017-11-02 12:07:16+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53391230 Bedankt voor je reparatie. Ik zie net dat ik daar de oorzaak van ben :S Excuses. Ben aan het experimenteren met de turn:lanes tool, maar hier is dus wat mis gegaan. Bedankt nogmaals, arvdk
arvdk (2017-11-02 12:21:31+00:00): Ik herinner me net dat ik dat stukje (wat verwijderd was) 'Combine way' met dat andere stukje.. vreemd dat t verdwenen is. Ik heb net even de relations hersteld en de turn:lanes alsnog toegevoegd :)
vindert (2017-11-02 14:18:55+00:00): Ik was in die omgeving ook bezig geweest met bewerken, ik was nog even bang dat ik zelf de weg verwijderd had.
Zouden de wegen vlak bij het stoplicht ook niet in verschillende wegen gemaakt moeten worden?
arvdk (2017-11-02 15:55:45+00:00): "moeten", dat hangt af van de tags. Als alle tags hetzelfde zijn, dan 'moet' het niet, alhoewel het niet fout is. Als je aan beide segmenten andere tags wil toevoegen, dan kan het niet anders dan ze op te splitsen.
vindert (2017-11-02 17:37:36+00:00): Moeten was meer bedoel als ' zou miss beter zijn' .
Wat ik met verschillende wegen bedoel is zoiets als hier: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53407221#map=19/52.01955/4.69436
De Kon Wilhelmina weg zou dan met 2 wegen aan de rotterdamse weg komen, met eenrichtingswegen e.d. Dan kun je ook 2 lanens(link en rechts/rechtdoor) aangeven vananf KW-weg naar Rotterdamse weg.
Ik ben (nog) geen kruispunten expert, dus ik laat het even aan jou.
Ik zie trouwen nu dat  ik in m'n changeset  beschrijving de verkeerde koningin genoemd heb :P
arvdk (2017-11-02 18:47:32+00:00): Ik ben het ook aan het leren :) Ik weet niet wat(lees: waarom) het verschil ik tussen de twee. Volgens mij enigszins willekeurig. Hoe groter de wegen, hoe eerder ze als losse wegen worden getekend. Ik denk dat er op de wiki iets staat dat ze los getekend moeten worden als ze fysiek afgescheiden liggen (grote groenstrook of eiland tussen de twee richtingen). Als het goed is moet het voor het routeren verder niet uitmaken. Ik zal het binnen kort nog eens uitzoeken, of op het forum vragen.
Harald Hartmann (2017-11-01 07:20:17+00:00): Hello markscalf. Hmm, i think something went wrong within this changesets ... 4,226 nodes with strange keys, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5203107962
I think you should review your changes ;-)
mueschel (2017-11-01 09:20:58+00:00): I deleted these nodes - most of them do not correspond to any structure on the ground, and they do not have any common OSM tag.
markscalf (2017-11-01 15:20:44+00:00): :( Was correcting some building alignments near the new arena and when I submitted them I noticed the 4000+ changes.  I canceled the upload and wasn't aware that these actually stuck.  My apologies.  Thanks for your help reverting.
freebeer (2019-10-02 07:24:06+00:00): not just remove the advert copy, but being co-located with a differently housenumbered starbucks, as i try to determine how misplaced a distant spam note is, it's nowhere in the area so i'm deleting it - no interest in fixing paid seo entries and no interest in having such inaccurate entries that would require me the better part of an hour to make a detour.
eggie (2017-10-31 20:35:34+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-10-31 20:52:54+00:00): Al die verloren restaurantnodes heb ik verwijderd. 
De Naaldhof het ik op de adresnode gezet evenals rest. Bomenpark.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
literan (2017-11-01 11:08:13+00:00): В десятый раз говорю вам - не надо в поле name писать все подряд. Оно - только для имен собственных, названий.
30303020 (2017-11-03 22:45:01+00:00): Sorry, the previous name changing in changeset 53404444 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53404444) was an accident. I was going to revert it now, but you already did. Thanks.
shahriar azadeh (2017-11-01 07:10:09+00:00): آقای فیروزه بجای درج اطلاعات غلط در نقشه سرگرمی بهتری پیدا کنید.
shahriar azadeh (2017-11-01 07:10:41+00:00): آقای فروزش
mike140 (2019-02-05 07:47:46+00:00): Я восстановил тег здания автосервиса, который был вами удален, и синтаксис времени работы - именно так он записывается по правилам OSM
mueschel (2017-11-05 16:06:04+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of this object? 

The tag you added might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let us know in case you need help!

Jan
eggie (2017-11-01 07:26:34+00:00):  highway=  rest_area  Node Area  Verzorgingsplaats 
Parkeerplaats langs auto(snel) wegen waar chauffeurs tijdelijk de snelweg kunnen verlaten om noodzakelijke rust te nemen. 
 
Klopt dat hier?
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
bradrh (2024-02-04 02:28:14+00:00): I this changeset is pretty old, but is Sioux Rd and the track west of it really private?
bradrh (2024-02-04 22:42:00+00:00): Never mind, a closer look showed me that the usfs road is admin only.
Øystein Bjørndal (2017-11-25 15:13:58+00:00): Hi  AndreasBjorne, I reverted this change since it does not play well with the current way we import address nodes in Norway. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Address_import_for_Norway

Address nodes should be stand-alone nodes.
GerdP (2017-11-01 06:37:57+00:00): Hi!
I've corrected a highway=brdige here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53415028
JJIglesias (2017-11-01 18:58:58+00:00): Saludos. por INE/IGM este Village se llama SAYANCHACA todo junto, deje el Sayan Chaca separado como alt_name,
Gracias JJ.
Podrias darme un email donde mandarte el Listado Oficial de Poblaciones de Chuquisaca por el INE/IGM
JJIglesias (2017-11-01 18:54:27+00:00): Excelente
TourenbikerFKB (2018-09-27 19:30:56+00:00): Hallo MKnight, mir ist aufgefallen, dass die Notrufsäulen an der A4, die du hier (nördl. von Friedwald) gemappt hast, schon vorhanden waren. Kannst du dir das nochmal ansehen?
MKnight (2018-09-28 07:54:43+00:00): Danke, hab sie wieder entfernt.
JJIglesias (2017-11-01 01:52:43+00:00): Saludos. Los Arcos en Chuquisaca se considera un HAMLET y tiene 117 habitantes segun el INE y el IGM.
Toda poblacion hasta 200 habitantes se considera un Hamlet y sobre eso se consideran Village, hasta los 5000 habitantes q pasan a ser Towns.
Gracias por editar en #OSM_BO
JJIglesias (2017-11-01 18:51:31+00:00): La Poblacion (Hamlet) de FERNANDEZ esta fisicamente MUCHO mas al Norte que la Poblacion de EL RODEO, q pusiste cerca de este Nodo; se ha movido Fernandez a su posicion correcta de acuerdo al INE/IGM
Gracias JJ
JJIglesias (2017-11-01 02:40:03+00:00): Gracias por editar #OSM_BO.
Esta poblacion de Roldana NO es un Village sino un Hamlet de 139 habitantes. Cuando pongas un tag de IS_IN, se debe colocar is_in:country=Bolivia o is_in:state=Chuquisaca; el is_in solo es muy generico.
Cuando no se conoce la demografia de un lugar es mejor irse por lo bajo "Hamlet" en vez de irse a "Village" de una vez.
Saludos JJ
naoliv (2017-11-01 10:16:22+00:00): Fabianno, bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap e obrigado por sua colaboração.
Este local que você mapeou é uma residência ou é uma casa para enfermos/idosos, que oferece assistência?
JJIglesias (2017-11-01 02:06:45+00:00): Saludos Enqrique. La Poblacion q pusistes es MOLLENI y NO MOLLINI, ambas estan en Chuquisaca solo q Molleni es un Village de 506 Habitantes segun el INE y el IGM.
Gracias por editar #PoblacionesBolivia y #OSM_BO
highflyer74 (2017-11-02 13:18:06+00:00): Hello!

Please be aware to keep the amount of typos as low as possible, and also check the wiki page for buildings https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building to use the established values. In this changeset there is building=yes', building=farmhouse and building=depot. Non of those is known as a building value.

If you have any questions, just let me know!
sladen (2017-11-10 10:56:06+00:00): Hello Highflyer74:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=yes

is used 200+ million times.  The documentation states "building=yes Use this value where it is not possible to determine a more specific value. ", further detail on:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

building=depot is used 500+ times:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=depot

building=farmhouse is used 200+ times:

  https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=farmhouse

It would be great if somebody could do a further on-the-ground survey and refine some of the mapping.
highflyer74 (2017-11-10 16:23:49+00:00): Hello and thanks for your reply. I think you misinterpreted my message... I am quite familiar with the usage of the building tag. Nevertheless, I was pointing you at some possible typo (building=yes') (!) and the not so common usage of the tags building=farmhouse etc., which should be tagged as building=farm (used >100000 times and documented).
HubMiner (2017-11-02 19:05:09+00:00): Looks good.  What are you asking to review?
zstadler (2017-11-12 01:07:32+00:00): Hi nicomar,
Several ways were added without any tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287393
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287394
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287414
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287415
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287416
Please tag them or delete them.
zstadler (2018-01-20 17:01:32+00:00): Hello nicomar,
Please respond to this message. I would prefer not to delete the ways that you mapped with no tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287393
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287394
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287414
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287415
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537287416
Thanks!
zstadler (2018-02-01 07:29:41+00:00): Although there was no response in the changeset discussion, nicomar has tagged or deleted the ways added without any tags in this changeset.
mueschel (2017-11-05 16:00:15+00:00): Hi,
could you describe what this node is exactly?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5203310121
It has many tags describing what it is, but unfortunately this doesn't help in OSM. No software (and other mappers as well) can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let us know in case you need help!

Jan
HubMiner (2017-11-02 19:02:08+00:00): Please match adjacent road names and designations.  I would slap a note for the general area requesting help to realign roads.
HubMiner (2017-11-02 18:56:37+00:00): Looks good.
mueschel (2017-11-02 09:13:55+00:00): Hi,
it looks llike you added the tag 'add:state' to all these 3000 nodes. Correct spelling would be 'addr:state'. Could you fix this?
Actually, this tag is not needed, the state can be determined from boundary relations which exist for all states.
jan
ianlopez1115 (2017-11-11 07:14:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53419257 where the changeset comment is: [North Triangle, Quezon City] remove nonexisting broadcasting-related facility
HubMiner (2017-11-02 18:54:48+00:00): Looks good.
adiatmad (2019-05-29 06:53:23+00:00): Halo. Apakah ini tempat ibadah? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537307305
adiatmad (2024-07-24 05:56:30+00:00): Tidak ada tempat ibadah ya, hanya warung bakso

(https://www.mapillary.com/app/?z=17&lat=-7.764189400000021&lng=110.88535219999994&pKey=603652308359276&focus=photo)
stephankn (2021-02-15 16:47:33+00:00): a pharmacy is a pharmacy, not a clinic. I fixed it for you.
Hb- (2017-11-21 12:05:49+00:00): With this change content=Obat was set for this storage tank https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537309084 According to https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obat this means a medicine or a drug. Please check if the English word "chemicals" fits better for this. It does include herbal medicines and is commonly used, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/content#values
Supaplex (2017-11-01 06:58:04+00:00): Is there a name for the shop?
Mike Baggaley (2017-11-03 09:11:55+00:00): Hi, on way 537316355 you have set foot=crossing, which looks like a mistake. Can you please check? Also, can you clarify foot=unofficial on way 536798839? The latter is tagged as a cycleway, and I believe that pedestrians are permitted on  cycleways unless there is an explicit no pedestrians sign, in the same way as they are allowed to walk in the road.

Cheers,
Mike
MacLondon (2017-11-04 20:53:49+00:00): Hi Mike,
I've corrected way 537316355 to footway=crossing.

The foot=unoffical was inherited from way 243330519, from which I have now removed it. Way 536798839 itself is part of a segregated section of CS8, with a subway separating it from the footway. It is marked with a blue cycle only sign, with a shared use sign where it merges again with the footway. I have therefore changed this to foot=no, as recommended at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Cycle_Tracks

Regards,
Mac
lyctkel (2021-05-14 14:51:16+00:00): Hi Ro Sun,
currently I'm removing the obsolete payment method ep_cash from OSM (used in Europe). I'm surprised to find ep_cash here. Was ep_cash used here and can it be removed or is ep_cash a typo and should be corrected?
Greetings from the Netherlands
lyctkel
mavl (2018-12-25 20:02:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:38:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:52:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:24:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:28:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:54:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].