piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
highflyer74 (2020-11-09 08:40:04+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe Deinen Eintrag angepasst, damit er auch nutzbar ist. Generell reicht es nicht, nur einen Namen einzutragen, sondern es bedarf bestimmter Attribute (Tags), die die Funktion eines Objekts beschreiben. So kann der Endnutzer danach suchen. Generell trennen wir meist Gebäudedaten von dem, was sich im Gebäude befindet. Letzteres wird dann als Node (Punkt) innerhalb des Gebäudeumrisses platziert. Ich habe das für Dich bereits gemacht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8096151886).

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren wichtigen Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!
Admasawi (2020-11-06 16:15:11+00:00): Resource used was Esri World Imagery
PT-53 (2020-11-06 16:30:31+00:00): InnaSumskaya,
das ist keine Verbesserung sondern ein Verschlechterung des tatsächlichen Straßenverlaufs! 
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-11-07 06:44:04+00:00): Sorry,
habe den Fehler erst jetzt gesehen.
Danke für das Ausbessern.
ScottWalkerAU (2020-11-06 22:44:38+00:00): Hi! Wondering what the source for these are? Seems like a good change, just curious.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93675015
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-11-07 12:51:18+00:00): Olá vitoria, voce tem alterado muitas coisas em Brasilia, e por uma superficial checagem ja vi um erro grande, marcar grande parte de sobradinho como area comercial: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867787393 por que fez isto? depois vu checar o resto das alterações.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-12-03 14:26:47+00:00): por favor vitoria, responda.
Vitória223 (2020-12-03 15:16:08+00:00): Bom dia Erick, tudo bem? Estou utilizando o Open Street Map para mapear feições para uma carta de suscetibilidade 1:50000/1:25000, portanto eu precisava do contorno das áreas urbanas e por isso estava delimitando as feições desta forma, mas com os comentário recebidos, decidi pausar este mapeamento e prosseguir de outra forma, delimitei como área comercial pois como era uma área grande, acredito que não se limite ao uso residencial. Já finalizei o mapeamento deste município e prossegui com a delimitação fora do OSM, caso tenha alguma sugestão, agradeço.
ScottWalkerAU (2020-11-11 03:57:23+00:00): Fixed a mistake in changeset 93893921
gendy54 (2021-01-21 22:07:10+00:00): Salut Philippe,

Tu as vu qu'il restait des tags affiliés à la gendarmerie sur ta correction de la police municipale. Comme tu es sur place je te laisse corriger et nettoyer les tags gendarmerie. Si tu connais l'emplacement de la nouvelle, n'hésite pas, Osmose fera la proposition pour rajouter ce qui manque.

Donat
PlaneMad (2021-01-04 06:04:03+00:00): Thanks for adding the bypass. Have completed the missing segments and aligned it to the latest imagery.

Have also retagged it as under construction. Has it already been opened?
ACarlotti (2020-11-13 23:19:27+00:00): I think you've incorrectly set most of Prince's Street as oneway.
Also, I think it is better to map this junction with all five ways meeting at a point, rather than having the 'contraflow' way meeting Prince's Street at a different node. I think this makes it easier to understand the junction layout, and is consistent with the layout on the ground (where I don't think the roads meet at two distinct point).
Intrinsical (2021-11-19 02:55:47+00:00): Why?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93676913
abakus_uploader (2020-11-06 23:31:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
danieldegroot2 (2020-11-06 17:26:52+00:00): Hey there and welcome,

Please add a descriptive summary for your changes, so people can get an idea of what you have changed. E.g. simply "added tags".
Kay Savory (2020-11-06 17:43:19+00:00): Updated to Retail/Domino Pizza
danieldegroot2 (2020-11-06 17:30:00+00:00): Hey there,

Please add a descriptive summary of the changes you made if possible, so people can get an idea of what you changed.
jmapb (2020-12-18 21:44:50+00:00): Hi there POB! 

When closing a POI that's combined with an address node, please consider removing the outdated tags and leaving the addr:* tags in place, instead of simply deleting the node. Especially if that address isn't mapped elsewhere in the building. That way we won't lose the address info.

(I've already restored this one.)

Thanks, jmapb
vorpalblade (2020-11-08 10:30:50+00:00): Just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. 

JOSM has access to the 2019 and 2020 aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS".

Also, "deleted ways" is too generic of a changeset comment. You should explain what and why you made the change (e.g., "Removed water feature that does not exist from NHD import").

Thank you for your contributions,
vorpalblade
AndersAndersson (2020-11-06 22:14:54+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

You have made some great additions.

However I don't think "games" is a valid tag.
Was there any fault with the old tag for these nodes?
zvenzzon (2020-11-16 21:18:13+00:00): Please see the page for tagging related to disc golf: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disc_golf
Carto'Cité (2021-01-06 09:54:39+00:00): Bonjour Florimond.
Merci pour ces modifications. Dis-moi, l'hôtel est-il terminé et en service (même si fermé temporairement), et sais-tu par où on y accède ? Il s'agit bien d'un hôtel Okko 4 étoiles ?
Cf. https://www.okkohotels.com/fr/actuality/okko-hotels-paris-gare-de-lest.523.html
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoTransilien
Florimondable (2021-01-06 10:42:56+00:00): Salut Antoine,
Non lors de ma visite j'ai pas fait attention si l’hôtel était ouvert ni a son accès. A priori l'accès se ferait pas le bas, j'ai pas vu d'escalier ou d’ascenseur au niveau du toit-jadin.
DaveF (2023-04-08 17:14:02+00:00): Hi 
Why have you put these cutouts into these fairways?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867807090#map=19/51.27301/-3.01671
cquest (2020-12-07 11:56:50+00:00): Bonjour,

Les adresses ajoutées sont très souvent mal placées.

Exemple (parmi beaucoup d'autres) avec la Rue Ferdinand Buisson que j'ai laissé en l'état.

L'intégration d'adresses demande du temps pour vérifier leur position. Ajouter des adresses dans OSM sans cette vérification n'a que peu d'intérêt vu que ces données sont déjà disponibles.

Merci de prendre le temps de repositionner correctement les adresses et de faire une intégration propre et pas un import en aveugle comme c'est le cas actuellement.

L'intégration dans OSM est l'occasion de monter en qualité ces données, pas d'en faire une simple copie.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-24 02:20:56+00:00): Please don't delete features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93679690
AnonymousAlligator (2020-11-06 20:15:51+00:00): Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks for your contribution! I live in Kenner so it's nice to see other people editing the map nearby :)

Minor nitpick, but we usually expand abbreviations ("Street" instead of "St"). Other than that, your edit looks great.

FYI, we have a Slack workspace if you'd like to meet other mappers from around the country: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/. We hope to see you around!
Alan (2020-11-07 01:10:03+00:00): 👏🏻
AdVerburg (2020-11-10 19:18:02+00:00): Misschien niet helemaal gegaan zoals bedoeld? Zie: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=13&lat=51.6915&lon=4.0419&item=1230&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=
Peter Elderson (2020-11-11 09:00:32+00:00): Verdorie zeg! Goed dat je het ziet. Ik gebruik in JOSM duplicate om relaties te kopiëren (handige tip gekregen), maar hier heb ik dus ook de wegen gedupliceerd. De validator van JOSM heeft mij voor een hele serie gewaarschuwd, die had ik allemaal opgelost, dus waarom hij deze niet heeft gemeld is mij een raadsel! Ik ga het oplossen. Bedankt!
Peter Elderson (2020-11-11 11:01:14+00:00): Ik ben duidelijk niet de enige die wel eens wat verdubbelt... morgen kijken wat er nog over is.
GeoJess (2020-12-15 18:19:03+00:00): Hi GBS Sidhu,

Thanks for all of your contributions to OSM :)
I hope you are having a good day. I was wondering what your reasoning is for removing the leisure=park for relation 3923973?

Hope to hear from  you soon,
Jesspher
felipeeugenio (2020-11-06 20:11:32+00:00): Estimado
un supermercado es shop=supermarket (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop) puedes apretar un botón y te aparece en castellano la página.

Adicionalmente, el tag building=yes se usa para mapear estructuras siguiendo la base, no la forma del techo.

en un rato mas lo arreglo.
gracias
lyctkel (2022-07-02 15:09:35+00:00): Hi Adamant1,
did you mean building=house at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775933157?
Regards,
lyctkel
Adamant1 (2022-07-03 22:46:31+00:00): Yes I did. Thanks for pointing out the error.
5m4u9 (2020-11-06 22:09:49+00:00): hola, blue jess gracias por volver a intentar mapear. Los edificio en Bolivia por lo general son rectangulares, así que cuando mapeas debes arreglar los ángulos (opción clic derecho). Hay que tener cuidado de no mapear los terrenos o lotes como edificios. Tratar de no inventarse edificios y si hay duda o no se ve bien no mapear y dejarlo cuando haya mejor imagen.

si los edificios son contiguos debes unirlos y no dejarlos separados.
Alexey Vazhnov (2020-11-07 11:39:04+00:00): Please don't do such changes in different parts of world in one edit.
user_5359 (2020-11-07 11:42:17+00:00): sorry about this, I had some trouble with my computer this morning. 
The way "National Tyre and Autocentre" was modified with telephone -> phone.
Alexey Vazhnov (2020-11-07 11:49:53+00:00): Thank you!
limes11 (2020-11-06 19:56:19+00:00): Hallo c_kap01, 

Willkommen zu OSM!

Hast du versucht die Sperrung aufzuheben? Leider fehlt nun ein ganzes Stueck weg, d.h. nach deiner Aenderung kommt man hier noch weniger durch als vorher. War das beabsichtigt?

Viele Gruesse, Limes
c_kap01 (2020-11-06 21:04:55+00:00): Nein, das war nicht beabsichtigt. Sorry. 

Das war meine erste Änderung. Werde es rückgängig machen.
limes11 (2020-11-06 21:16:24+00:00): Kein Problem. Im Prinzip kannst du einfach einen der beiden Wegen nehmen und entsprechend verlaengern, damit er mit dem anderen verbunden ist.

Dieser Weg ist bis zur Bruecke 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59087518

die einige hundert Meter entfernt ist, mit "access=no" ausgestattet, d.h. gesperrt. 
Ist er denn bis zur Bruecke wieder begehbar? Dann koenntest du diese "access=no" Werte auf den Wegen einfach loeschen.

Gruss, Limes
c_kap01 (2020-11-07 06:24:55+00:00): Der Weg ist vollständig begehbar. Von Nienhagen bis Börgerende.
limes11 (2020-11-07 09:10:33+00:00): Sieht gut aus, danke!
Richard (2021-01-13 10:43:37+00:00): Hello - is the N2 really a signposted bicycle route?
Mario Quinta (2021-01-13 19:05:13+00:00): Yes
Richard (2021-01-13 19:14:25+00:00): Thanks! Some of it seems really very busy to be a safe cycle route but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
gileri (2020-11-07 09:19:52+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour la rue Professeur Florence c'était déjà le cas, l'étiquette "psv" est plus générale que "bus" elle comprends les taxis aussi :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:psv

En résumé pas besoin d'ajouter bus=yes

Éric
EarthtoTones (2021-01-13 01:51:52+00:00): Привет, rockwheels, спасибо за ваш вклад в osm! Я заметил здесь (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93683005#map=13/50.5632/36.5704) и здесь (https://www.openstreetmap.org/ changeset / 94812840) что вы добавили кое-что на карту, например: бордюры, трава, мусорные баки, и платформы. Я не могу найти эти функции на спутниковых снимках и они мне не кажутся логичными, учитывая, что они расположены посреди главной улицы. Я хотел спросить, откуда вы знаете, что эти объекты там существуют? Вы также добавили повторяющиеся пути, например, way 38572893. Учитывая, что эта дорога, улица Щорса, уже нанесена на карту, мне кажется, что дубликат здесь не подходит. Пожалуйста, посмотрите Wiki по передовым практикам работы OSM для общих рекомендаций и передовых методов составления карт: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground. Спасибо!

Hi rockwheels, thanks for mapping! I noticed here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93683005#map=13/50.5632/36.5704) and here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94812840) you added certain features such as kerbs, grass features, bins, and platforms, that I am unable to find in imagery, and that don’t seem logical given they are located in the middle of a major street. I wanted to ask how you know that these features exist? You also appeared to add duplicate ways, such as way 38572893. Given that this road, улица Щорса, is already mapped, it seems to me that a duplicate does not belong here. Please see the OSM Good Practices wiki for general mapping guidelines and best practices: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground. Thank you!
trigeo (2020-11-06 20:33:34+00:00): source: Maxar Premium
skquinn (2020-11-09 16:41:12+00:00): note 2412522*
user_5359 (2020-11-08 06:24:44+00:00): I am very much in favour of cleaning up key variations, but this should be done with sense and not lead to an increase in the number of keys. 
You change service:vehicle:inspection to car:inspection, but ignore that there are also service:bicycle:% and service:motocycle:%.
On the other hand you do not clean up the combination car:tyres and
car:wheels, which both mean the same thing.
ti-lo (2020-11-08 16:04:02+00:00): The number hasn't increased, but otherwise someone would have complained about removing info. The "service:vehicle" prefix has been introduced (undiscussed) by the ID admins and wasn't clarified unless several times mentioned (and noticed) on the mailing list. This circumstances were mentioned on the shop=car page, but removed by some individuals which seem to want to hold up clarification about that topic.
I assume that "wheels" means "rim", so that's something different to "tyres". I'd appreciate to get this topic further, so feel free to participate on the shop:car page discussion tab (I think "centrally" is better noticed by the majority than here)
ti-lo (2020-11-08 16:09:12+00:00): Here's the mentioned entry on the shop=car page : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:shop%3Dcar&diff=1767933&oldid=1767491#Tags_used_in_combination
ti-lo (2020-11-08 16:11:53+00:00): Or in short : "ignorance is not a virtue" https://youtu.be/Pshix63B8AM
This topic is more than 2 years old, here's the 2nd time for it to be mentioned on the mailing list :
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-May/036119.html
user_5359 (2020-11-08 16:30:51+00:00): The mentioned change in the Wiki was rightly withdrawn. 

Of course you can still get upset about the iD developers after almost 1000 days, but wouldn't a clean description be the right way? 

Especially since no counterproposal is documented and presented to the community for voting ( which also gets an acceptance from the iD developers).
ti-lo (2020-11-08 19:13:54+00:00): That's an interesting thesis : The ID editor admins may simply proceed, causing a bunch of random tags which are not to handle and the info to the mailing list doesn't count ? By the way, here's the proposal : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shop_subtags
ti-lo (2020-11-08 19:15:06+00:00): Probably also interesting : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:shop%3Dcar#Service_is_not_versatile_enough
ti-lo (2020-11-08 19:16:29+00:00): So what do you mean by "clean description" ?
redd (2025-11-29 13:39:29+00:00): this was not a good edit. The car: prefix is not really widely used when compared with second_hand and service:vehicle-Prefix
balint36 (2020-11-07 13:59:39+00:00): Szia! A szerkesztéseiddel eltávolítottál egy vonalat, ami elválasztotta a lakott területet a mocsaras területtől. Kérlek, legközelebb figyelj!
4b696d (2021-02-19 16:26:50+00:00): Moin,
nur ein kleiner Hinweis. Beim THW in Halle war nichts doppelt. Ich habe daher deinen Änderungssatz an der Stelle rückgängig gemacht.
lakedistrict (2020-11-07 19:11:12+00:00): Hi, A late welcome to OSM and thanks for all your mapping in Cumbria! Just one thing: when adding new paths, please make sure that they connect to existing paths so that they can be used for routing and navigation. In the iD editor you can drag the end of the path onto the other and they should snap together and show as connected with a grey, rather than white, node/circle. I'm not sure how this is done in GoMap. I've fixed this for you on the path you added to Watch Hill. If you ever have any questions feel free to send to me a message. :)
Frans S (2020-11-08 15:13:20+00:00): A remark on your mappings
You did not move the mappings to the groundplans. and Please be more accurate in following the outlines of buildings.
(it are not always simple rectangular buildings)
These issues have been solved by a validator yet
Best regards
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:21:30+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
Mathias_ADAV (2021-05-11 14:41:43+00:00): Bonjour, Je viens de faire la modification de voie verte de Lumbre, c'est bien un highway = path puisque c'est accessible également au piéton.
Cordialement,
Mathias
eggie (2020-11-06 21:51:08+00:00): Dag Sv8x  Svp niet name= gebruiken
voor de soort
Kijk even in de wiki hoe je de Nederlandse naam kunt toevoegen.
Alleen bij prominente bomen de name tag gebruiken zoals Wilhelminaboompje e.d.
Anders gaat de soortnaam renderen.

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-06 21:53:00+00:00): Dus bv https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species
species=Quercus robur (or species:de=Stieleiche or species:en=English Oak or species:en=French oak or ...)

en dus species:nl= Valse acacia
M_Gaugg (2020-11-07 17:03:31+00:00): Danke vielmals
Cascafico (2020-11-07 17:50:36+00:00): Hi, don't confuse buildings with yard walls
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93686240
Warin61 (2020-11-10 08:02:32+00:00): Hi,

You have added ways to the administration boundary of Newcastle. Corrected. Please take care.
5m4u9 (2020-11-06 22:11:32+00:00): Hola, los edificios con varios pisos tienen sombras, debes tener cuidado al mapear. Es mejor dibujar en los techos y luego mover la sombra.
5m4u9 (2020-11-06 22:12:49+00:00): Muchos edificios no son viviendas "house", sino son edificios comerciales, en la duda no hay que inventarse... este tipo no es visto desde una imagen satelital, hay que estar en el terreno y ver.
5m4u9 (2020-11-06 22:17:49+00:00): si los edificios son contiguos y estan unidos por las paredes, es posible seleccionarlos y rectangulizarlos todos a la vez.
HubMiner (2022-04-24 04:04:11+00:00): Please explain this change, this looks like personal places.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-01 06:36:39+00:00): Reverted by DWG for apparent vandalism & personal info: changeset/133157933
user_2066394 (2021-04-24 11:58:07+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/7920875008
!bm (2020-11-06 23:33:20+00:00): Hallo JaayJaay,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM!

Das war sicher gut gemeint, aber tatsächlich leider eine Verschlechterung der Datenqualität. Beachte bitte, dass wir in OSM möglichst die Kontur des Gebäudes am Boden erfassen wollen und nicht die Dachkonturen. (S. dazu Mapping-Grundlagen im OSM Wiki – Blick in selbiges lohnt generell!) Dächer hängen aber oft über und verdecken so leider die tatsächliche Form des Gebäudes. Hier war diese bereits aus öffentlichen Daten importiert. Daher zurückgesetzt und Gebäude weiter spezifiziert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93688523
Bei Unklarheiten einfach rückfragen! Happy mapping!
--besteGrüße!bm
JaayJaay (2020-11-07 00:07:13+00:00): Vielen lieben Dank für die Info. Ich hatte mich durch das Kartenmaterial geklickt und hatt gedacht, dass es etwas mit dem Kartenversatz zu tun hätte. 
Kann man die Info in Josm irgendwo sehen, dass etwas aus öffentlichen Daten  importiert wurde?
Liebn Gruß!
!bm (2020-11-07 00:47:09+00:00): Prinzipiell kann man sich in JOSM die History jedes Objekts ansehen (außer jener, die man gerade erst anlegt, die haben natürlich noch keine item-id, da gibt es dann einen Hinweis). "Selection"-Window: [History]-Button. Dort sieht man die einzelnen Changesets sowie, so mit angegeben, die verwendeten Cs-Quellen. Im speziellen Fall war das vor 2015 und nicht vermerkt, konnte man also nur durch Prüfen des entsprechenden ALKIS-Layers ("Gebäude") herausfinden. In JOSM kannst du die alle einbinden, fündig wirst du im FIS-Broker (aka Geoportal Berlin.)
--besteGrüße!bm
5m4u9 (2020-11-06 22:25:21+00:00): al mapear edificios, y poner altura no es cuestión de inventarse todo a 3 metros, esta bien eso en la normativa arquitectonica, pero en Cochabamba casi nadie respeta esta altura...

¿cómo determinaste la altura? aproximada?
!bm (2020-11-06 23:54:22+00:00): analog / s. Anm. zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93686753 – hier gleich komplett gelöscht. 
revert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93689047
O Fim (2021-04-22 01:34:19+00:00): etiqueta do ponto incompleta, todos os pontos na importação ficam incompletos, rever as etiquetas faltantes
jemily1 (2020-11-08 12:08:58+00:00): por favor, intenta hacer conjuntos de cambios  más pequeños y centrados en un mismo lugar en vez de hacer varios cambios por diferentes países, ya que esto hace que el recuadro donde aparecen tus contribuciones abarque mucho mapa
Andrea Musuruane (2020-11-17 08:45:58+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, non usare le immagini satellitari di Bing perché non sono ben allineate. Meglio usare Esri Clarity Inoltre, le feature come i giardini non devono essere attaccate alle highway. I nomi degli itinerari escursionistici (sentieri), se presenti, vanno sulle relazioni e non sulle highway (dove ci vanno i nomi delle strade (cioè quelle presenti nello stradario comunale). I tag addr:street=Frazione Sassaia sono errati. Erano corretti i tag addr:place=Frazione Sassaia già presenti, perché l'indirizzo non si riferisce a una strada ma a un luogo. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93688289
Warin61 (2021-01-14 01:05:10+00:00): Hi,
relations are not required for simple objects. Both deleted and simply tagged on the ways. 
Many of these buildings are houses, some garages.