piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2016-06-29 11:29:13+00:00): Warum hast du diesen Fußweg hinzugefügt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426547531 Da gibt es doch (laut Bing) keine bauliche Trennung? Oder ist euer Fußgängerrouter zu doof, um auf die Straße zu springen, wenn der Haltestellennode mal nicht mit einem Way verbunden ist?

Bitte lösche den Way wieder, sonst mache ich es.
MENTZ_TU (2016-07-01 08:50:40+00:00): Wurde gelöscht. Grüße
mavl (2019-01-04 16:57:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:57:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
aharvey (2016-06-25 07:56:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274991 where the changeset comment is:
SammysHP (2016-06-27 09:41:49+00:00): Hallo Schlaubert, das name-Tag ist für den offiziellen Namen gedacht und nicht für die Beschreibung. Das trifft auch auf deine anderen Änderungssätze zu. Ich korrigiere das, verwende die Tags in Zukunft aber bitte korrekt.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:57:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
AndersAndersson (2016-06-22 19:37:18+00:00): Hello,
The name for the camp site got wrong. Hope you can fix that.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426552928

Regards
Anders
mavl (2019-01-04 16:57:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:57:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
aharvey (2016-06-25 11:11:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274990 where the changeset comment is:
mavl (2019-01-04 16:57:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
dieterdreist (2016-06-22 12:12:43+00:00): the cafe is placed in the middle of the road, please refine the position
dieterdreist (2016-06-22 11:55:24+00:00): this feature should be put inside a building, it is unlikely to be found outside
dieterdreist (2016-06-22 11:55:37+00:00): also the name seems strange
pyram (2016-06-23 16:30:17+00:00): Bitte keine Pseudonamen eintragen ("Küche"/"Glockenturm"). Außerdem ist die Küche sicherlich keine Kirche ;-)
Obernetter (2016-06-23 16:32:16+00:00): Es ist die Küche des Gemeindehauses der Kirche. Warum darf ich den Glockenturm nicht bezeichnen, wenn es ein Glockenturm ist?
pyram (2016-06-23 20:15:04+00:00): In name steht der Name und nicht die Funktion. Es gibt auch Anfänger, die zu jedem Haus "name=Haus" ergänzen oder zu einem Kirschbaum "name=Kirsche" :-(
Was es ist, soll man daher nicht mit einem Pseudonamen versehen, sondern mit der Eigenschaft. Zum Beispiel: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcampanile
oder häufiger: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:tower:type%3Dbell_tower
man kann auch eine ergänzende Beschreibung dranhängen mit description=*, wenn einem gerade nichts passendes einfällt oder es noch nicht gibt.
aharvey (2016-06-25 04:29:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274969 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 05:36:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274981 where the changeset comment is:
Nakaner (2016-06-28 13:41:56+00:00): Deine Gedanken zur Bahnsteigkantenhöhe sind gut, bloß wird überwiegend height=* verwendet. Trotzdem kannst du gerne platform_height=* verwenden, denn es gilt bei OSM ja "You can tag what you want." – ob es dann auch ein Datennutzer auswertet, steht auf einem anderen Blatt.

Falls du Bedenken hast, dass es mit der Höhe über NN o.ä. verwechselt wird: Das wird als ele=* bzw. ele:<Höhenreferenzsystem>=* erfasst.
Durko_freemap (2016-06-23 10:15:26+00:00): Zdravim, par pripomienok k Vasim zmenam
1. addr:postcode = nechajte len cislo, Podhájska, cize nazov obce patri do addr:city
2. phone=+42190151414, jedno cislo chyba

Doporucenie:
bol som na web stranke, pre restauraciu vytvorte novy bod, mozno niekto by siel do restauracie ale do kina nie. Ten internet v kine asi nikto nevyuzije, ale v restauracii ano.
Durko
Rainbow45 (2016-06-23 08:27:04+00:00): Das funktioniert immer noch nicht. Kann mal jemand helfen?
MKnight (2016-06-23 11:39:23+00:00): 2-3 Tage solltest Du Dich schon gedulden, bis die Router das haben.
Rainbow45 (2016-06-23 12:20:00+00:00): Ok, das wusste ich nicht. Kein Problem, danke für Info. War mein erster Versuch, etwas zu editieren...ich bin nicht sicher, ob ich es richtig gemacht habe.
MKnight (2016-06-23 13:09:24+00:00): Sieht richtig aus (allerdings nicht mein Spezialgebiet)
dvdhoven (2016-07-08 19:30:03+00:00): Bij een junction=rondabout werkt oneway=no niet meer. Dan krijg je standaard eenrichting.
Ik ben hier met het repareren van fietsknooppuntnetwerk al vaak tegenaan gelopen.
Ik heb nu de junction=rondabout verwijderd. Fkp route 45-47 had hier last van.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
muralito (2016-06-23 02:01:32+00:00): Mariano:

El oneway=no que tenia etiquetado esta calle era lo de doble mano que pones en el comentario. Al sacarselo como vos hiciste queda igual, pero es menos "firme" porque puede parecer como que el oneway no fue relevado.
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:20:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274992 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 04:20:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274978 where the changeset comment is:
SomeoneElse (2016-06-22 18:20:53+00:00): Hello,
Could you explain what "MINOR: FIX SOURCES" means?  This is a changeset with a large area, and it'd be nice to know what had changed without having to refer to third-party tools.
Best Regards,
Andy
GinaroZ (2016-06-23 00:10:19+00:00): Had a look at the history of some nodes/ways and it seems like this changeset has removed "source=nearmap" from them
TheSwavu (2016-06-24 01:41:40+00:00): Yeap this is one of many bulk edits this user has done where they have deleted source=nearmap for no apparent reason.
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:25:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274965 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:18:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274963 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 05:56:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274988 where the changeset comment is:
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-22 19:57:28+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3236662 ?
MrYadro (2016-06-22 12:35:33+00:00): http://mapwarper.net/maps/14579
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:57:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274985 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:12:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274919 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:10:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274914 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:11:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274913 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:14:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274910 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:28:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274907 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:15:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274720 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:47:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274721 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 02:43:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274718 where the changeset comment is:
datendelphin (2016-06-22 15:45:04+00:00): the post office already existed
aharvey (2016-06-25 04:45:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274717 where the changeset comment is:
TheSwavu (2016-06-22 21:10:10+00:00): What was the point of this changeset?
aharvey (2016-06-25 02:42:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274543 where the changeset comment is:
TheSwavu (2016-06-22 21:09:37+00:00): What was the point of this changeset? All you've done is deleted all of the source=nearmap tags. How do you know that these weren't from nearmap? What is source=aaronsta supposed to mean?
aharvey (2016-06-25 04:10:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274548 where the changeset comment is:
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:47:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274549 where the changeset comment is:
Anu Sree Murali (2016-06-23 18:28:54+00:00): Flood affected area
aharvey (2016-06-25 03:22:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274545 where the changeset comment is:
pyrog (2023-07-28 09:53:11+00:00): Hi,

route=bicycle/mtb is inappropriate.
- the separator must be ;
- a simple bicycle can't use a track/path instead mtb.
- the route tag can't be used on ways, only relations.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26346797/history

Best regards,
Yves
Greg_Rose (2017-10-06 20:40:57+00:00): Objects are fake, and do not exist. User has had over a year to respond to changeset comments - many of the user's object additions have been shown to be bogus (repeating names and derivations of the same name; phone numbers with country/area codes from other places; bus stops on side streets and alleys that couldn't possibly accommodate a bus, etc). 
Deleting/reverting.
aharvey (2016-06-25 05:05:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274410 where the changeset comment is:
Hjart (2016-06-22 22:20:38+00:00): Denne er jeg ikke enig med dig i
wille (2016-12-10 18:04:00+00:00): Olá, Renildo!!

Muito obrigado por sua colaboração ao OpenStreetMap!

Sempre que for mapear nomes de ruas utilize letras minúsculas, e apenas as iniciais em caixa alta, por exemplo; "Rua da Alegria".

Muito obrigado,
wille
EneaSuper (2016-06-23 17:03:00+00:00): Mmmhhh penso che l'istituto Siotto Pintor abbia un area scolastica, data la presenza dei campi da gioco nelle vicinanze...
csmggl (2016-06-23 17:08:04+00:00): Ci dovrebbe essere landuse=school nell'area
EneaSuper (2016-06-23 17:53:20+00:00): Ho esaminato gli elementi e non c'è più (la mappa restituisce un area parziale).
Magari l'hai cancellata per errore xD
csmggl (2016-06-23 18:47:42+00:00): C'è, nel perimetro attorno all'edificio
EneaSuper (2016-06-23 18:50:35+00:00): Allora quando posso controllo meglio :)
aharvey (2016-06-25 02:50:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40274398 where the changeset comment is:
Olga | Yanosik (2016-11-09 09:12:31+00:00): Czy wiadomo coś o postępie prac na tej ulicy? W sieci brak informacji o remoncie, a już tym bardziej o terminie zakończenia.
user_5359 (2016-06-22 16:49:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
aharvey (2016-06-25 01:58:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40266451 where the changeset comment is:
user_5359 (2016-06-22 16:27:58+00:00): Welchem to OSM! I add a remark to your note 601816 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/601816#map=15/41.3889/-87.4797)
Teiron (2016-06-22 22:46:46+00:00): 👍
mamyma (2016-06-22 17:10:45+00:00): Ok, thanks
pnorman (2016-06-24 06:56:26+00:00): Hello,

you seem to be doing a mechanical edit of some kind. In OSM mechanical edits need to be documented and you need to consult with the community first. Was this done here?
Warin61 (2016-06-24 07:49:46+00:00): In this changeset, looks to be removing the source=nearmap tag ... in bulk. WHY?
aharvey (2016-06-24 16:47:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40258772 where the changeset comment is:
Supaplex (2016-06-22 16:58:46+00:00): 請問全家是收了還是換其他店家?
Jacy Liu (2016-06-23 02:39:45+00:00): 已經收了, 目前這個位置沒有任何便利商店, 最接近的 FamilyMart 是在捷運 A9 站旁邊
Baloo Uriza (2016-06-22 15:33:14+00:00): Welcome to Tulsa and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Glad to see some fresh names around here!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-23 12:47:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127955987 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits from a while ago - ATMs in the middle of a forest, etc.
jeka p (2016-06-22 16:14:54+00:00): Hi! I have corrected some tags, which where not made acc. to the rules (phone, name).
Is it a hotel or apartments? if apartments - please mark it ttourism=apartment
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dapartment).
If you mark the place properly - it will be easier for people to find you.
Rent_and_Stay (2016-06-22 16:24:31+00:00): Ні, thank you. Okay, I will try to mark correct.
Commodoortje (2016-06-23 17:50:42+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  diverse aanpassingen/verbeteringen verricht. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.

Ik betwijfel of dit een serieus bedoelde edit is.
Waarom 2 nodes aangemaakt? Eentje heb ik er inmiddels verwijderd.
Heb je een website van de Opticien?
Heet de opticien werkelijk zuidlaren?
muralito (2016-06-23 02:10:21+00:00): UTE no es gobierno, es una empresa publica. Gobierno es, por ejemplo, URSEA.
Supaplex (2016-06-22 16:57:14+00:00): 大巴六九藥用植物園區這個標餐廳不大對吧?
chihchun (2016-06-23 06:57:32+00:00): 他是餐廳沒錯，別被名字誤導了。
* 大巴六九藥用植物園區 - 訊息公告 - http://da869.weebly.com/
Supaplex (2016-06-23 17:36:44+00:00): 利嘉林道變快速道路了@@
chihchun (2016-06-24 05:01:41+00:00): 抱歉，筆誤未發現。謝謝修正！
Commodoortje (2016-06-23 17:58:33+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  changeset gerevert wegens vandalisme. Nodes zijn in werkelijkheid niet aanwezig, Gelieve niet toevoegen omdat het kan, dit schaadt de OSM kaart in ernstige vorm. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
kayle (2016-06-23 09:06:45+00:00): Zdravím, podľa toho čo som našiel na webe je Andromeda firma predávajúca fontány (a krby a ďalšie).
V tom prípade označenie amenity=fountain (neviem ako to ma preložené maps.me) je nesprávne označenie. Toto značí fontánu viď. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dfountain ktorá je napr. na námestí a nie obchod kde sa dá kúpiť.
gileri (2016-07-10 16:40:28+00:00): Bonjour, c'est une bonne intégration des magasins dans la gallerie marchande !

Sur quoi êtes-vous basés pour avoir le positionnement des magasins ? J'aimerais faire pareil sur le magasin Auchan Caluire mais je ne sais pas trop comment m'y prendre...
Vincent Dechenaux (2016-07-11 17:38:39+00:00): Bonjour! J'ai utilisé cette page http://www.aushopping.com/plan-du-centre-commercial-auchan-saint_priest et aussi la connaissance des lieux :)
gileri (2016-07-23 13:32:53+00:00): Ok merci !
Geography Canada (2016-07-29 20:49:31+00:00): :( You stopped doing real changeset comments.. Anyways, welcome to OSM!
pfg21 (2016-06-23 05:54:21+00:00): Блин рисовать сначал научись, зачем такую глупость сделал ??
Rzhavin21 (2016-06-23 07:37:15+00:00): Почему глупость?
pfg21 (2016-06-23 13:08:07+00:00): А зачем на улицу вешаешь адресные теги ?? Они как то связаны ??
msevilla00 (2016-06-24 07:37:31+00:00): Hola Eugenip, creo ayer borraste parte de la línea del teleférico de la expo. :-(
Hay que revisar los cambios antes de dar a guardar. Un saludo
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 19:48:30+00:00): removido
malenki (2016-06-23 17:38:49+00:00): Hallo Hiddenhausener,

in diesem Changeset hast du von diesem¹ Weg den Name "Diestelkamp" enfternt mit dem Kommentar "[…] NRW-Atlas: Digitale GrundKarte 1:5000; […]"
Nun zeigt genau diese Karte für mindestens einen Teilabschnitt dieses Weges den Name "Diestelkamp". Wie passt das zusammen?

Viele Grüße
malenki

¹ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26604122/history
Hiddenhausener (2016-06-23 18:07:45+00:00): Hallo! Wahrscheinlich habe ich den Namen gelöscht, weil highway=service keinen Namen hat. Habe aber nicht kontrolliert ob es der Name der Hauptstraße ist. Flüchtigkeitsfehler. Ich habe den Namen wieder eingetragen und den Weg in unclassified geändert. Gruß, Gerald
malenki (2016-06-23 18:40:55+00:00): Danke für deine prompte Antwort!

Wie meinst du
"weil highway=service keinen Namen hat"?
Falls du damit ausdrücken willst, dass highway=service keine Namen bekommen sollen, möchte ich dich auf den rechten Kasten dieser Wiki-Seite hinweisen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice

Laut taginfo gibt es derzeit über 1.000.000 benannte highway=service:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/highway=service#combinations
Hiddenhausener (2016-06-23 19:34:54+00:00): Vor einiger Zeit hatten wir über die OWL Mailingliste eine Aktion, bei der in einigen Orten die highway=service überarbeitet wurden.
Regel 1 war highway=service hat keinen Namen.
Regel 2: Wenn es einen Namen (Quelle vorhanden) hat, dann ist es kein highway=service, sondern z.B. residential.
Daran halte ich mich immer noch.
dieterdreist (2016-06-23 10:11:54+00:00): according to your comment, this is the townhall. I have added the tag amenity=townhall. If this is not correct, please let me know.
dieterdreist (2016-06-23 10:12:36+00:00): you might also consider to change the building tag from "yes" to "townhall" if the building was built as a townhall.
DD1GJ (2016-06-22 19:01:36+00:00): Nachtrag: Es waren die CS 
40189645, 40187703, 40168459, 40168296, 40168057, 40167732
Grillo (2016-06-22 20:47:08+00:00): Notera att det du lägger till i Maps.me-appen syns globalt i OpenStreetMap, och att appen alltså inte är till för privata noteringar. Jag tog bort ditt tillägg.
FredrikLindseth (2016-06-22 19:13:07+00:00): Kjekt med nye fjes som deltar med OpenStreetMap. Du bør vurdere å tagge voksenopplæringene dine med http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcollege eller kanskje amenenity=school. Sånn som de er nå så er det bare en node med et navn.
Luuuddooo (2016-06-23 00:33:57+00:00): Pourquoi avez-vous supprimer tout le bâti ?
Et même des routes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254614529
gormo (2016-06-27 07:01:26+00:00): Hallo, ein Stollenmundloch kann noch mit weiteren  Tags versehen werden, z.B. man_made=adit und start_date=<Datum der Auffahrung>, historic=yes (da historisch). Weiteres siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dadit
naoliv (2016-10-04 20:55:23+00:00): praia, cuidado com as edições
Você acabou apagando o nó que representa o município de Tefé em sua edição
letihu (2016-09-13 11:53:15+00:00): Was sollen diese ganzen unvollständigen Linien darstellen?
Diese z. B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426642513/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426642521/history
Commodoortje (2016-06-23 18:07:26+00:00): Leuk dat je je bijdrage levert aan OSM.
Vermoedelijk heb je onderstaande tweet ook gelezen, ik wel namelijk
https://twitter.com/FrieseWoudloper/status/745650894243569664

Deze persoon heeft iets meer tagging toegepast.
Misschien dat je deze nog kunt toevoegen.

access=yes
amenity=piano
musical_instrument:piano=yes
musical_instrument=piano
Luuuddooo (2016-06-23 00:31:25+00:00): Bonjour,
Le cadastre a l'air complètement décalé par rapport à la réalité, il suffit de comparer avec les traces de la couche Strava pour s'en convaincre, ça me parait donc une très très mauvaise idée de recaler les routes sur le cadastre.
user_5359 (2016-06-23 04:39:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Constable (2016-06-23 10:57:53+00:00): il nome dell'attività (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1520458650) è davvero "kebab"?
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-06-22 21:56:47+00:00): W takim razie idealnym tagiem jest place=locality.
naoliv (2016-07-15 17:55:16+00:00): ampcosta22, não é correto grudar as áreas junto com as ruas.
Por exemplo, a grama não fica grudada ao meio da rua no mundo real.
Quando for traçar áreas, faça o desenho apenas onde elas de fato se encontram, sem conectar nenhuma delas às ruas ao redor.
ampcosta22 (2016-07-15 18:01:38+00:00): Ok. Vou corrigir.
naoliv (2016-07-15 18:03:21+00:00): Eu estou corrigindo aqui já.
Só avisei para você fazer dessa outra maneira em suas próximas edições.
Obrigado.
ampcosta22 (2016-07-15 18:18:50+00:00): Vc coloca também as restrições nas interseções das vias?
naoliv (2016-07-15 18:20:04+00:00): Coloco sim, pode deixar.
naoliv (2016-07-15 18:21:17+00:00): Ah, você já fez as restrições. Vou ver o que falta.
naoliv (2016-07-15 18:28:27+00:00): Essas restrições de "proibido retornar" também não são necessárias quando a origem e destino é a mesma rodovia.
Já se entende que não é permitido isso.
ampcosta22 (2016-07-15 18:30:06+00:00): Nem para utilização em GPS?
naoliv (2016-07-15 18:32:29+00:00): A maioria já entende que isso não se deve fazer.
Alguns possuem opção de habilitar ou desabilitar esse comportamento (geralmente alguma opção com "U-turn")
Você está utilizando algum programa que está tendo problema com isso?
ampcosta22 (2016-07-15 18:35:18+00:00): Acho que não. Verifiquei a um tempo já. Às vezes eu olho no OSRM aí do site mesmo na hora de traçar algum percurso.
Maanya (2016-06-24 06:23:48+00:00): Hey solosix, Thank you very much for putting  the edits in place. Though most of the edits are great! you have deleted few building, this could have been by mistake. We would deeply appreciate if you could kindly, take care of them.
nammala (2016-06-23 08:16:09+00:00): Hi LBeidler,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap , your edits looks fine. But may I know the reason why are you deleting the service roads which are edited by someone else. Please don't do that again.

cheers,
krishna
trial (2017-03-03 18:52:08+00:00): Der Name scheint eher Jugendherberge Linz zu sein, oder?
Siehe http://www.jugendherbergsverband.at/de/jugendherberge-detail/hid/9/haus/jugendherberge-linz
Ziegler (2017-03-03 20:19:38+00:00): Das Gebäude hat zwei verschiedene Namen.
Das sieht man auch auf der genannten Seite vom Jugendherbergsverband.
Du kannst den Namen gerne ändern. Vor meiner Änderung war kein Name drin.
trial (2017-03-03 20:39:18+00:00): Stimmt,; habe ich nachher gesehen. So hat der Knot alt_name dazu (und mehr) bekommen.
user_5359 (2016-06-23 04:52:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changes because the whole property has not only one address.
Alecs01 (2016-06-23 19:23:10+00:00): da qui in poi invece stai iniziando a disegnare il tracciato di una vecchia ferrovia, però railway=abandoned suppone che ci sia qualche segno sul terreno che indichi la presenza della vecchia ferrovia, qui vedo che hai tracciato linee che attraversano strade, case e giardini privati; sei passato di lì a vedere i resti della ferrovia? o hai copiato il tracciato da qualche fonte esterna (che è tutto da vedere se sia compatibile o meno)? sfido chiunque a indovinare dove passava la ferrovia dalle foto aeree di Bing, fermo restando che in OSM si usa mappare ciò che esiste, non ciò che non c'è più
fedc (2016-06-25 06:15:07+00:00): Non mi pare di aver tracciato linee che attraversano case: ho segnato il tracciato dell'ex linea ferroviaria solo dove ha lasciato delle tracce. Ad esempio nel tracciato delle strade costruite sull'ex sedime, oppure nel caso di terrapieni o trincee, oppure in tracce di altro tipo come i confini fondiari segnati da recinzioni.
Alecs01 (2016-06-25 08:15:33+00:00): qui per esempio: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=45.94344&mlon=8.82658  da dove hai copiato quella linea? oltre a questioni di licenza dei dati, una vecchia ferrovia del cui tracciato non c'è traccia visibile è un'informazione interessante, ma che non ha posto in OSM secondo me
fedc (2016-06-25 09:22:26+00:00): Ho corretto l'errore rimuovendo il punto in cui manca la traccia. Grazie della segnalazione.
Alecs01 (2016-06-25 10:41:44+00:00): è giusto un esempio clamoroso, neanche il resto della traccia si vede dalle foto Bing, quest'altra per esempio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426673802; non hai risposto ancora alla domanda fondamentale, da dove l'hai copiata? OSM è fatto da utenti che apportano la propria conoscenza diretta, non è un copia-incolla da fonti esterne che potrebbero anche non essere compatibili in termini di licenza, è l'ennesima volta che te lo scrivo, non sei nato ieri e sei iscritto da un bel po', dovresti saperlo bene, io davvero non ti capisco