piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-25 18:27:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2019080299/history - do you remember whether it was existing and usable as a water source?
Phil M (2023-03-31 18:59:38+00:00): No, it is a historical item and local point of interest. It serves no purpose as a water supply.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-31 21:11:30+00:00): Does it qualify as tourism=attraction? Or some historic=* tag?
Phil M (2023-03-31 23:10:58+00:00): Semantically the closest specific tag would be historic=memorial, since it's more or less a memorial to the good deed of supplying drinking water.

In OSM terms it probably wants to be a tourist attraction, though that's a tall ask for what it is :)

You can see what it is here: https://archives.bristol.gov.uk/records/17563/1/493
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
AndresDuhour (2022-07-21 17:49:26+00:00): Hola, buenas tardes! estaba revisando nombres de calles en Corrientes y veía que en el sig municial (https://gis.ciudaddecorrientes.gov.ar/idemcc/#18.058281322119814/-27.48160/-58.76292) esta calle se denomina Centenario. Figura como Alfonsín hasta la ruta 12. pero por ahí usted tiene conocimiento de la zona así que quería confirmar esa información.
Saludos!

Andrés
eggie (2022-04-27 19:04:54+00:00): Het probleem zijn de losse rijstroken. Die worden in OSM als één wegelement getekend met daarin het aantal lanes en de tun:lanes.
Dat is een aparte tak van sport.
Ik zal straks wel even kijken.
Gr eggie
A67-A67 (2022-04-28 13:25:22+00:00): Op de kruising Laan der Verenigde Naties - Dreeslaan - Thooroplaan zijn geen fysieke scheidingen tussen de rijstroken, maar slechts verf. Deze horen dus niet ingetekend te worden als aparte ways. Hetzelfde geldt voor de t-splitisingen op de Tooroplaan. Ik heb dit hersteld.

Andere feedback:
- De destination-tag is bedoeld voor informatie van de wegwijzers, niet voor straatnamen.
- Een bus_guideway is een geleide busbaan. De correcte tag voor busbaan is highway=busway.
eggie (2022-04-28 13:33:34+00:00): En eigenlijk is het weer terug bij af...  
:)
Volgende keer dan toch maar een revert.. en voor Issa een beetje een leerschool. 

Groet
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
eggie (2022-04-27 19:06:43+00:00): Hier dus ook. Geen aparte wegen intekeken. De splitsing hoort ogeveer bij de fietsoversteek te liggen. Dus gewoon opschuiven.
Verder kun je geen busroutes bewerken met editor iD..., maar dat is weer een andere verhaal.
eggie (2022-04-27 19:15:42+00:00): Dat missende stuk hoort er dus niet.. Die tagging zit al in die ene baan
eggie (2022-04-27 19:58:27+00:00): Ik ben hier even bezig... Svp geen aparte rijbanen meer intekenen bij de kruispunten als er geen fysieke afscheidingen zijn.
Issa Beganović (2022-04-27 20:32:51+00:00): oké
eggie (2022-04-27 21:38:57+00:00): Ik heb even tussendoor de rijbane die niet apart ingetekend horen te worden verwijderd.
Nu moeten alle turn:lanes en lanes nog gecheckt worden en er zijn een aantal busroutes door de war geraakt.
Wanneer je busroutes bewerkt dan kan dat alleen maar met editor JOSM.
eggie (2022-04-27 21:56:47+00:00): Omdat je alles opnieuw hebt ingetekend zijn de busroutes een chaos geworden :)
Dat kost echt nu teveel tijd om te herstellen. Eens op m'n gemak naar kijken.
Wanneer je echt met routerelaties aan de slag wilt zul je je moeten verdiepen in JOSM.
Zal even vragen of een van de OV mappers een simpele oplossing heeft
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710    

Groet,
eggie
Leo Slager (2022-04-27 23:32:18+00:00): En alle 8 busroutes zijn ook weer gerepareerd.
Dat kostte me meer dan een uur !

Een volgende changeset die weer zoveel schade veroorzaakt, zal worden reverted.
Issa Beganović (2022-04-28 00:41:58+00:00): Geleerde les: wijzig geen delicate routes zonder expliciete toestemming.
eggie (2022-04-28 04:34:33+00:00): Leo bedankt...
.. en Issa.. Je hebt het met de beste bedoelingen proberen te verbeteren. Maar er zitten veel addertjes onder het gras bij osm.
Straks zal ik nog even kijken met de validator. Er loopt ergens nog een bromfietsdoorsteek e.d.
Om je werk te reverten was ook weer zonde... maar had wel veel tijd gescheeld.
Groet
Eggie
Dimitar155 (2022-04-27 20:05:08+00:00): Hello Stomario. From where is this information? Are these points refering to somebody's private address and phone number?

Здравейте Stomario. Откъде е тази информация? Тези точки отнасят ли се до нечий личен адрес и телефонен номер?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
wkdgs (2022-04-28 10:14:45+00:00): Alle anderen "addr:city"-Tags in der Umgebung haben nur den Eintrag "Mühlhausen" statt "Mühlhausen/Thüringen". Das sollte man wahrscheinlich einheitlich halten.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120273740
wkdgs (2022-04-28 10:14:45+00:00): Alle anderen "addr:city"-Tags in der Umgebung haben nur den Eintrag "Mühlhausen" statt "Mühlhausen/Thüringen". Das sollte man wahrscheinlich einheitlich halten.
wkdgs (2022-04-28 10:15:00+00:00): Alle anderen "addr:city"-Tags in der Umgebung haben nur den Eintrag "Mühlhausen" statt "Mühlhausen/Thüringen". Das sollte man wahrscheinlich einheitlich halten.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120273740
◪ Jarv (2022-04-27 21:11:52+00:00): Changes reverted in 120277421. Please do not add fictional streets & changes to Open Street Map. Please view my comment on your first change for more information.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120273983
◪ Jarv (2022-04-27 21:11:59+00:00): Changes reverted in 120277421. Please do not add fictional streets & changes to Open Street Map. Please view my comment on your first change for more information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120274221
avinet_ua (2022-06-18 07:48:05+00:00): -
Robert Whittaker (2023-01-31 19:09:43+00:00): Thanks for the very detailed changeset comment! Can I just check (if you can remember) whether there really are two parallel routes (the track and path) running NE from https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=52.60698&mlon=1.40271#map=19/52.60698/1.40271 ?

According to Norfolk County Council's GIS data, Surlingham FP 12 should run SE alongside the residential property, and then meet Surlingham FP 10 at a T-junction at that point, where you can turn right or left. This isn't the geometry that's currently mapped.
sarukwa (2023-02-01 18:22:36+00:00): Hello! Thanks for your good work on PROW mapping.
The answer is yes, i walked that route just before making this changeset and can remember.

The real world parallel routes were a little surprising, and seem to be a recent change, as Google Street View images from 2019 show something different. Perhaps the locals want to keep walkers off the track as much as possible.

There is no connection between the  2 routes at the point you linked to, they only connect at the NE end. Also, the parallel routes are separated by a fence and/or hedge. So it seems to me these must be separately mapped and cannot be a 'track with sidepath'.
Robert Whittaker (2023-02-02 11:47:24+00:00): Many thanks. I think you're mapping is perfectly correct then. Though the paths on the ground don't agree with the official Public Rights of Way data.
lordmcdrake (2022-04-28 06:23:35+00:00): Ahoj,

oficiálna adresa v štátnom registri adries tu je naozaj "Železničná 717/64". Prosím o nápravu.

https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13679190?pos=48.952405,22.000542,18
micheleOSM3 (2025-04-03 15:50:17+00:00): vedo che hai impostato alcuni punti con sac_scale=demanding_mountain_hiking , conosco il sentiero e mi sembra eccessivo, perché hai usato questo valore?
MxxCon (2022-04-27 23:21:51+00:00): Why are you deleting legitimate tags from POIs?!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120275588
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-27 23:25:07+00:00): Valentine Galley closed in 2017. This whole area is littered with shuttered businesses. Please go to their website to verify… which you should have done before commenting.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120275588
MxxCon (2022-04-27 23:30:06+00:00): You deleted shop=clothes tag from "Left Field | Choctaw Ridge".
You deleted amenity=dojo "Khan Taekwondo Olympic Style".
You deleted cuisine=chinese from "Beijing Restaurant".

These are all legitimate and valid tags, yet you deleted them for no reason.
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-27 23:39:44+00:00): Left field is a shop not a clothing store. Their main service is denim repair. And they also sell some denim clothing. It’s right out front on their store. There are certain maps for the disabled that don’t read the Chinese restaurant tag so it misses that business in their map. Same with gyms. These changes very little for sighted and hearing privileged maps. Name + restaurant  tag gives good  description of business. 😊
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120275588
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-27 23:40:14+00:00): I did give my reason in the comment section I’ll be more detailed next time.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120275588
MxxCon (2022-04-27 23:47:48+00:00): You are vandalizing the map to fit some very specific situation. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Also, I question you claims of modifying the map to help disabled users considering I know you map for upland.
If your software can not handle some OSM tags, you fix your software, not vandalize the map by deleting valid and established tags.
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-28 00:48:04+00:00): my sister is hearing impared. I have been working on Google maps mostly and just learned of this service with my Upland investment. Do as you please I will try and follow the rules you you can stop bothering me. Thanks
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-28 00:48:43+00:00): BTW some of these tags have not been updated since 2017. Great job keeping up to date.
wkdgs (2022-04-28 10:09:08+00:00): Hi,

wenn ein Gebäude abgerissen wurde, man es aber nicht aus der Karte entfernen möchte, bietet sich ein Lebenszyklus-Präfix an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Ich hab das Haus dementsprechend angepasst und nur den Tag "building=yes" zu "demolished:building=yes" geändert. Im ID-Editor wird das Haus jetzt auch als "kürzlich abgerissenes Gebäude" angezeigt..

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120275606
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
WoSoe (2022-04-30 04:47:05+00:00): In dem Änderungssatz sind viele selbstüberschneidende Wege hinzugekommen, welche in diversen »Error Detecting Tools« als Fehler/Warnungen ausgegeben werden.
Beispiel:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=13.72243&lat=51.02516&zoom=17

Zur Beseitigung der Datenfehler wäre eine Überarbeitung der entsprechenden Wege wünschenswert.
user_5359 (2022-05-01 15:34:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9699005299. What is the meaning of the tag 0.1 = 0? Please notice also the separator for object over different level ist semicolon not dot (level = 0;1 instead level = 0.1)
DerSebi96 (2022-05-02 11:49:06+00:00): Hey there,
I removed the intermediate levels (e.g. 0.1, 0.2 etc.) of the stair pathways where they are not needed.
I will also look into the issues thrown by the error detecting tools.
Frans S (2022-04-28 11:47:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120276276
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
kylor (2022-04-27 23:56:05+00:00): I think that most areas between the triangle of OR 126, and US-20 should be scrubs, and that west of sisters, OR is definitely woods. Let me know what you think of my recommendations.
Dino Michelini (2022-05-05 17:03:42+00:00): Ciao, non mio sembra che la modifica del tag highway da a track a tertiary sia corretta e risponda a quanto stabilito nella wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=tertiary). Si tratta di una strada interpoderale per transito mezzi agricoli e non vi sono insediamenti urbani. Per favore riverifica la correttezza delle tue modifiche e fai i dovuti aggiustamenti in base alla wiki di OSM. Grazie
FA91 (2022-05-05 17:33:24+00:00): Ciao, io sono di Tuscania e conosco personalmente questi posti. La strada in questione è una strada provinciale (sebbene non colleghi Tuscania a nessun altro centro abitato) e si chiama strada provinciale Valle del Marta. È asfaltata a tratti, nei tratti in cui non è asfaltata è perché l'asfalto non ha retto ed è rimasta in terra battuta. Proprio ultimamente la provincia di Viterbo ha provveduto a sistemare meglio la strada in questione. A prova di quello che dico ti linko un articolo di tusciaweb dove si richiede la manutenzione da fare a questa strada da parte della provincia nel 2013:  http://www.tusciaweb.eu/2013/02/subito-un-intervento-per-strada-valle-del-marta/
FA91 (2022-05-05 17:34:47+00:00): Quindi, anche se non collega due centri abitati, essendo una strada provinciale avevo cambiato la tipologia di strada in strada terziaria
FA91 (2022-05-05 17:44:47+00:00): Comunque se ciò non rispetta i requisiti, possiamo metterla come strada minore/non classificata
Dino Michelini (2022-05-06 16:01:29+00:00): In OSM non è scontato che una SP sia automaticamente tertiary; infatti, la classificazione delle strade viene fatta in base all'utilizzo reale della strada. Se la strada è utilizzata prevalente per accesso ai campi (interpoderale) si opta per track con surface=asfalt,ground o tracktype=1,2,3,4 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack) in altri casi dove sono escluse altri tipologie (service, residential ess.) si può utilizzare unclassified (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified).
PS. Sto miglioranto il tracciato escruionistico della Antica Via Clodia (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Dino%20Michelini/diary/398924) conosci per caso la tagliata etrusca che si trova dalle parti di San Pantaleo?
FA91 (2022-05-06 18:03:01+00:00): Ok. Non conosco la tagliata etrusca che si trova dalle parti di San Pantaleo. Per quanto riguarda la via Clodia, recentemente ne è stata rinvenuta una nuova porzione durante alcuni lavori per l'installazione della rete elettrica vicino l'intersezione tra la strada provinciale tuscanese e la strada località guado cinto:
http://www.tusciaweb.eu/2022/02/torna-alla-luce-un-antico-tratto-strada-romana/
Frans S (2022-04-28 11:43:09+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Often the shadow of a building is visible. Do not include these in a mapped building.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120276620
RedEyedVireo (2022-04-27 20:50:40+00:00): This changeset removes name=Pride Park from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29755982 as the only Pride Park that I could find was Pride Park Playground https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1055530356 which is on a different parcel then https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29755982 If anyone is unhappy or can find a source that refers to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29755982 as Pride Park feel free to change it back.
Glassman (2022-04-28 23:13:04+00:00): Question - is that a fence or gate? I did see the gate at the other end so I assume it's tagged correctly but I wanted to make sure since the road appears to be continuous.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120276846
Vinber-Pro (2022-04-29 15:04:35+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue :)

un petit mot d'accueil sur le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Concernant le panier de basket, le nom ne doit pas être utilisé pour décrire, vous pouvez trouver quelques bonnes pratiques par ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions, remarques à les poser !

Bonne journée

Vincent
Frans S (2022-04-28 11:45:36+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
When a building has an extention, please map those as well.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120276974
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-03 22:13:30+00:00): please, dont add projections
sanch3z (2022-04-27 21:47:14+00:00): Hallo Andro Mappa,
nur weil Warnungen angezeigt werden, heißt das nicht, dass die Elemente, die für die Warnung verantwortlich sind, einfach gelöscht werden können. Um diese Warnung auszubessern, schau dir bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway an. Danke!
wkdgs (2022-04-28 10:00:18+00:00): Hi,

deine bisherigen drei Änderungssätze sehen katastrophal aus und mussten wieder rückgängig gemacht werden.

Bitte sei bei deinen nächsten Änderungen etwas gewissenhafter um die nicht Arbeit anderer Mapper zu zerstören.

Und bitte füge keine Fantasieobjekte ein. OpenStreetMap soll nur das abbilden, was tatsächlich existiert, nicht, was man sich wünscht.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120277380
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
paganella31 (2023-04-04 15:58:04+00:00): Ciao! Potresti chiarire cosa c'è di preciso in questa area? Vedo che hai usato tag relativi al bosco, però poi nel commento scrivi elisuperficie, che necessita ovviamente di uno spazio aperto. Anche la panchina e il punto panoramico mancano, se ti è possibile puoi inserirli?

Dalle immagini aeree si nota che la vegetazione è meno densa, ho provvisoriamente ritagliato un po' di spazio vuoto che è comunque da sistemare.

Grazie intanto per i tuoi contributi
Saradas00 (2023-04-04 20:18:07+00:00): Ciao, premetto sono alle prime armi.

La zona che ho indicato è un pianoro, in passato usato per fare la legna (già allora chiamato piazzola), poi calata a valle tramite teleferica (presenti ancora dei pezzi delle vecchie teleferiche). La comodità in passato stava nel fatto che il fiume Adige restava molto più vicino al paese rispetto ad ora e si poteva portare la legna sul fiume.

Ora l'area è stata recuperata, viene utilizzata dal Nucleo Elicotteri come area di addestramento, simulando una zona di lavoro "alpina" non tanto distante dall'aereoporto 

È presente una panchina e l'area funge anche da punto panoramico

In caso di consigli o dubbi sono a disposizione

PS. Ho tracciato il sentiero che da valle porta a monte, quello che prosegue devo tornare a farlo perché ho perso la traccia