piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
yuryleb (2015-07-30 15:13:58+00:00): Раньше вроде не была частью E20, вот и решил рекомендовать проезд только по Таллинскому шоссе, а не в объезд. Да и сейчас не вполне понятно, зачем маршрут на объезде - он здесь дошел до границы Эстонии и закончился, зачем же его "зацикливать"? Это официальная информация?
Vitalts (2015-07-31 08:39:39+00:00): Раньше, действительно, не была. Но это лишь по недосмотру тех, кто наполял Е20 в ОСМ. Явно это были не местные.
Раху и Паул Кересе я недавно в Е20 добавил, после поездки в Питер на авто, так что, информация "Survey". Оказалось, что по Таллинскому 10-ти тонники не пройдут и для них-то эта объездная - единственный путь следования по маршруту Е20, знаки объезда, само собой имеются.
Думал, Таллинское убрать из Е20, дабы кольца не было, но нет, не комельфо, ни один B-ник не попрется по объездной, тем более в обратную строну, когда на стоянку ожидания не нужно заезжать.
Кстати, о стоянки ожидания, она хорошо видна на мапнике, справа от Раху, "Narva ooteala". Здесь происходит регистрация на пересечение границы и присутсвует стоянка ожидания, дабы в центре города пробки не создавать. Так вот, в направлении Нарва - Иван город ни один авто (да и мото) не пересечет границу не побывав на этой стоянке. Исключение, разве что, рейсовые автобусы. Вот как ее корретно обозначить и включать ли в Е20 я пока не знаю...
yuryleb (2015-07-31 08:43:49+00:00): Тогда, конечно, повышаю статус этих улиц обратно :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072528 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072526 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072525 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
mavl (2015-07-29 17:33:48+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Неправильно обозначать территорию поликлинники как здание. Тогда получается, что внутри вашего большого здания находятся другие здания.
dudka (2015-08-27 09:22:10+00:00): some multipolgons are invalid now because of your change..
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3601592
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3601593
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072523 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072522 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072521 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072520 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072519 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072516 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
pauliusz (2015-07-29 14:36:23+00:00): Ištryniau jūsų pridėtą IKI tašką, nes visi tag'ai jau yra ant pastato.
Ewen Hill (2015-07-29 13:43:46+00:00): Hi, 
   Should this not be set to abandoned railway and the station as historic? This way the details will exist but will not display?
imroy (2015-07-29 18:53:59+00:00): My understanding is that OSM should only map the present, not the past. I couldn't see any station or tracks in either Bing or Google aerial views, nor Google Street View. That's why I removed them.
Ewen Hill (2015-07-29 21:58:10+00:00): Thanks for the reply. I can see the trackbed to the east the primary road via Bing and I assume that either removal or moving to abandoned would work. If gives an indication to why the roads around it are that manner however you may be correct.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072515 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072514 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
literan (2015-07-30 09:51:34+00:00): ну еще все меню бы в тег name запихнули
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072513 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072512 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
EdLoach (2015-07-29 14:33:03+00:00): Did you mean to delete Currys PC World when you were amending the building outline?
PlaneMad (2015-08-01 06:09:36+00:00): Restored the deleted building. Nikhil, please be more careful with existing objects and make sure you don't accidentally remove the work of others while making improvements.
unsungNovelty (2015-11-16 08:32:43+00:00): I will @PlaneMad. Thanks for pointing this out.
chillly (2015-08-02 11:22:37+00:00): When was this road changed to an A road?
Skippern (2015-07-29 13:29:00+00:00): E so isso no IJSN, ou tem mais?
LucFreitas (2015-07-29 15:05:33+00:00): Tem mais, Skippern. O shapefile das edificações de segurança lista todas as penitenciárias do estado e as delegacias, além de hospitais psiquiátricos (manicômios). A localização de algumas delegacias, no entanto, pode estar desatualizada.
Skippern (2015-07-29 15:42:24+00:00): pra os delegacias verifique se nao ha outros delegacias mapeados, e coloque um note que fonte pode ser desatualizada
LucFreitas (2015-07-29 16:21:47+00:00): Ok, obrigado.
edward17 (2015-07-29 13:18:31+00:00): Эти почтовые отделения уже есть в OpenStreetMap. Вот они: [отделение №1](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2764739848), [отделение №3](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1482296639).

Не нужно было добавлять их копии, к тому же с не совсем точными координатами.
Lasha Danelia (2015-07-31 13:31:39+00:00): ღვთისმშობლის ხარების ეკლესია
Hjart (2015-07-30 11:40:11+00:00): Hej og velkommen til vores lille hobbyprojekt.
Via http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ har  jeg lige opdaget nogle nys opståede fejl her.

 Jeg kan se du har eksperimenteret med cykelstier/baner her. Vær opmærksom på at cykelbanerne langs Århusvej allerede var markeret med cycleway=lane tags på selve bilvejen. Det gør at cykelbanerne nu kommer til at fremtræde dobbelt på cykelkortet. Hvis du  iøvrigt har planer om at mappe yderligere cykelstier vil jeg bede dig om studere vores udmærkede cykelstivejledning: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning først
Hjart (2015-07-30 11:45:26+00:00): Dette gælder også bl.a. Ådalsvej og Herredsvej.
Hjart (2015-07-30 11:47:50+00:00): Desuden er du kommet til at koble Herredsvej fra de fleste af dens forbindelser og de cykelstier du har lavet er ikke korrekt forbundet til de veje/stier de krydser.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:22:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072511 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072509 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Deanna Earley (2015-07-29 14:25:14+00:00): Welcome to the OSM project. I see you created a new node near a road but didn't add any data (tags) to it.
Did you mean to add more data?
You may want to check out:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contribute_map_data
Kapralektoponikiew (2015-07-29 13:22:29+00:00): poprawiłem położenie góry
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072507 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
d1g (2016-03-03 17:32:21+00:00): Обсуждаем откуда название пошло здесь: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=581001#p581001
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072506 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
GerdP (2015-10-26 17:38:29+00:00): please review:
highway=stairs is rarely used,
I guess you meant highway=steps,
but that tag is only valid on ways.
I've changed the tags to a note for now.
Skippern (2015-07-29 13:59:58+00:00): Se voce pode adicionar um comentario no seus edições seria bom, temos mapeadoras monitorando o atividade, e um comentário sobre o que voce tentando fazer ajudando bastante em verificar seus contribuições.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072505 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072503 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072501 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072500 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072498 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072497 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072496 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
cquest (2015-07-30 15:08:58+00:00): Pour quelle raison avez-vous supprimé le bâtiment ? (que j'ai récupéré)
cquest (2015-07-30 15:11:14+00:00): Je doute que ce gare se trouve plein milieu de la route.
Merci de vérifier vos contributions avant de les envoyer sur les serveurs OSM.
Ce n'est pas la première fois que vous envoyez des données incorrectes et venant d'un professionnel c'est inacceptable quand c'est régulier.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072495 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072492 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
literan (2015-07-30 09:58:00+00:00): Вы уверены, что в одном здании размещены три супермаркета? Ригла это точно не аптека?
cquest (2015-07-30 15:12:38+00:00): Le nom est incorrect... et multiple (présence de ; )
Merci de corriger.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072490 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072489 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
no1x (2015-07-29 14:43:12+00:00): изменил геометрию здания ,поправил название, добавил сайт, добавил номер телефона и почтовый индекс
cquest (2015-07-30 15:13:13+00:00): L'agence immobilière n'est pas dans le bâtiment voisin ?
suolaherne (2015-07-29 22:07:28+00:00): perhaps mistake?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072488 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072485 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072484 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:21:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072483 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
cquest (2015-07-30 15:18:48+00:00): il semblerait qu'un doublon ait été créé... merci de corriger
SomeoneElse (2016-09-06 10:43:35+00:00): You've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3672043470 as a locality "Hall Grove Farm", but it currently seems to be within a school.  Can you explain what has happened here?
Also, please do use changeset comments when making changes to OpenStreetMap.  OSM is a collaborative project; we have to work together to create the best map.  Changes such as this with no source and no changeset comment don't help explain why the change was made or what the source was.
Best Regards,
Andy
DUGA (2021-05-30 13:21:45+00:00): The boundary is a mess.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362988271/history#map=18/39.89900/-76.85147
oslim (2017-12-09 13:00:46+00:00): Hi Vitor,

are the roads in this industria area http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362988058 still correct?
Vítor Dias (2017-12-09 16:23:17+00:00): I gave it a quick look and it appears that my mapping became somewhat outdated...
oakland (2016-06-02 16:54:43+00:00): Updated one way/two way status of service road leading to parking garage.
AgusQui (2016-09-19 03:48:28+00:00): Verificado el cruce de Illia-Damonte-Vicente Lopez con Mapillary: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=C8qqygCLoFcnnWIWnrIsUw&lat=-34.703808&lng=-58.388567&z=17
Esta correctamente mapeado.
SomeoneElse (2015-09-07 08:44:34+00:00): Hi - I think that something went a bit wrong here.  The deletion of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1354106849/history truncated 2 bits of the westbound A45 so that there's now a gap in it (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/430380).  Also http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220911277/history was deleted - is that what became http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60403355 ?
SomeoneElse (2015-09-07 17:07:48+00:00): For info, I've joined the gap in the A45 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33861448 .
SomeoneElse (2015-08-06 11:20:20+00:00): Hello - is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3672160848 part of any other way (I'm guessing it's at one end of the steps)?  Currently as mapped it's a "free floating" stile that's not part of anything else.
Self-Perfection (2015-11-13 09:57:16+00:00): Вы этой правкой изменили только name= (Мобил Элемент -> Мосигра) и shop=  а у точки ещё были
contact:phone=+7 495 6467803
contact:website=http://www.mobilelement.ru
name:en=Mobil Element
name:ru=Мобил Элемент

Pushpin эти теги не показал при правке? ИМХО стоит выбросить такой редактор.
Haserbaba (2015-11-17 09:39:34+00:00): Пушпин показывает форму для POI со всеми вероятными полями.
контактная информация на втором экране.
Да, можно не увидеть и ошибиться. Поэтому лучше удалять точку и создавать новую
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-29 20:10:42+00:00): Aleś tu namodził... przez dłuższą chwilę musiałem to poprawiać...
Hjart (2015-07-30 09:41:52+00:00): I guess there's a small error in Agger (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5399908)
SomeoneElse (2015-08-04 11:58:22+00:00): Hi - just for info in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33095500 I change the stiles that you added  so that it was actually on the path, not near it, and also so that the stiles were actually part of walls and boundaries, not just near them.  That'll give routers a chance to understand whether a particular path has a stile on it or not.
Cheers,
Andy
maciek-szn (2015-07-29 18:49:13+00:00): Jeśli zmieniasz ograniczenie prędkości ze standardowego w obszarze zabudowanym (50/60), to zmieniaj również source:maxspeed na sign. Pozostawiając PL:urban tworzysz niespójność. PL:urban oznacza, że jest to prędkość standardowa w obszarze zabudowanym, a tak przecież nie jest. Z kolei wartość sign mówi o tym, że ograniczenie wynika z wartości na znaku.
d3mol3k (2015-07-29 19:14:00+00:00): OK dzięki - uczę się ale dzięki Tobie wyciągam wnioski.
maciek-szn (2015-07-29 19:30:32+00:00): Polecam się ;-)
d3mol3k (2015-07-29 19:35:33+00:00): Czyli jeśli trafia się ograniczenie w terenie zabudowanym czy też nie zabudowanym nie stosować Pl:urban i PL:rural tylko maxspeed=sign. Na normalnych drogach dawać 90 i PL:rural (poza zabudowanym) lub 50 i PL:urban (w zabudowanym) przy standardowych prędkościach?
maciek-szn (2015-07-30 06:05:12+00:00): Tak, ale w zabudowanym dajemy:
maxspeed = 50
maxspeed:conditional = 60 @ (23:00-05:00)
To ze względu na podwyższenie dopuszczalnej prędkości w porze nocnej.
kreuzschnabel (2018-06-14 05:10:06+00:00): Kleiner Hinweis zum Tagging der Kirche: „evangelisch“ ist in OSM denomination=protestant, nicht =evangelical. Evangelical steht für „evangelikale“ Gemeinden mit sehr konservativ-wörtlichem Bibel- und Glaubensverständnis: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelikalismus
Firefishy (2015-08-02 21:54:23+00:00): Awesome. Appreciate any help improving the map. Happy to answer absolutely any questions you have. - Grant
Rogehm (2015-07-29 21:14:45+00:00): Hallo, finde ich gut, das du das outdoor_seating tagging nutzt. Da dies ganz neu ist, können sich noch Fehler einschleichen. Bitte achte darauf: Das Restaurant bekommt das tag outdoor_seating=yes; der leisure-Außenbereich sollte dringend den operator (Restaurant) beinhalten, sonst ist manchmal keine Zuordnung möglich bei einer späteren Auswertung der POI.
Danke und viel Spaß mit dem tag.
LG  Rogehm
Jacob's-Staff (2015-07-30 00:13:14+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung! Ich habe das auch erst kürzlich herausgefunden, muss ja nicht immer ein Biergarten sein. Die Änderungen habe ich soeben hochgeladen, hoffe es stimmt nun.
Skinfaxi (2015-08-01 22:13:02+00:00): source bing when you correcting tags?
cdavila (2015-08-02 06:45:00+00:00): Why not? This change set includes several elements; most of the modified tags were simply incorrect but perhaps I used Bing to get better information about a given element. If you supply some details about the element modified I would try to give a more detailed answer.
Skinfaxi (2015-08-02 07:19:13+00:00): Okay. I just try to survey tracks that are mapped from bing out in reality round about my home and get confused. 

Thats why i am looking for changesets using bing...
changchun_1 (2015-08-28 11:20:49+00:00): Änderungssatz revertet da Daten falsch sind
pyram (2016-09-08 15:05:42+00:00): Auf den sieben Grünstreifen zwischen den Straßen ist tatsächlich ein Golfplatz?
changchun_1 (2015-08-31 09:12:03+00:00): Änderungssatz mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33698623 korrigiert
changchun_1 (2015-08-28 11:32:52+00:00): Auch hier wurden Feldwege in cycleway umgetragen. Dies ist falsch!
changchun_1 (2015-08-31 09:03:54+00:00): Feldwege wurden revertiert mit changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33698428
aceman444 (2019-11-06 18:45:54+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za aktualizacie kostolov. Ak to spravne chapem (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denomination a https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evanjelick%C3%A1_cirkev_augsbursk%C3%A9ho_vyznania_na_Slovensku), tak "evanjelicka cirkev augsburskeho vyznania" (ECAV) na Slovensku by mala byt v OSM znacena ako denomination=lutheran. denomination=evangelical (v JOSM prekladane ako "evanjelikalny", nie "evanjelicky") je nieco ine. Jeden taky ste oznacili v Galante, ten som opravil, ale ak mate takych po Slovensku viac, tak prosim pozor na to a pripadne treba opravit. Dakujem.
*Martin* (2019-11-19 21:55:17+00:00): Kostoly som riesil pred 4 rokmi, takze ak nieco take najdes, kludne to oprav. Teraz viac riesim freemap web.
ToeBee (2015-08-12 22:49:28+00:00): The buildings south of Marie Street seem oddly cropped at a specific straight line. Is this building data from an external source?
Brunovanm (2015-07-30 21:52:21+00:00): Observation on location
Denis_Helfer (2015-07-31 07:02:02+00:00): Hello,

Pour une fois, on est les seuls : http://osm2020.free.fr/qa-commune/histo-evoaddr/evo-2015-07-29_2015-07-30.htm
Tu veux pas mettre les codes FANTOIR sur les relations associatedStreet ?
Govanus (2015-07-30 18:56:04+00:00): The system was breacking beneath me as I did the last parts of this it was difficlut over the session too.
naoliv (2015-09-08 00:08:28+00:00): Raul, quando for colocar a população nos lugares coloque apenas o número, sem espaço, ponto, traço ou qualquer outro caracter.
Raul_Silpe (2015-09-08 01:03:19+00:00): Obrigado! Farei assim de agora em diante.
cadsauxk (2015-11-01 12:19:40+00:00): "Via de Ligação" é o nome da BR262 em Sabará?
Vítor Dias (2015-11-03 10:24:20+00:00): Tanto no BHMap quanto no IBGE a via aparece como Via de Ligação. A BR-262 na verdade segue o trajeto da antiga MG-5, conforme especificado no mapa, mas falta ainda corrigir a relação da BR-262.
cadsauxk (2015-11-03 11:37:16+00:00): "Via de ligação" me soa mais como uma descrição do que como nome, do mesmo jeito que "retorno" não seria um nome. Não seria o caso de passar isto para o campo descrpition?
Didymops (2015-07-30 17:19:14+00:00): Very good. Thanks!
daganzdaanda (2015-07-30 23:53:02+00:00): You're welcome ;)
Some of the other parks around here also have pretty old / weird tagging. I don't know what the opinion of local mappers is about these. Should I "be brave" and change leisure=park to nature_reserve? 
Also, boundary=protected_area might be more fitting than b=national_park (but might not be rendered yet...)
SomeoneElse (2015-08-04 08:05:47+00:00): Thanks for fixing http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/400215 !
philippec (2020-05-25 22:36:03+00:00): "de staart" ?
Ik heb ook wat over fortificaties gelezen en deze benaming ben ik nog nooit tegen gekomen, toch niet bij Brialmont.
Foto's zijn er niet, want niemand mag erin.
RobSmits (2020-05-26 06:25:06+00:00): Op deze webpagina vind je meer informatie over "de kop" en "de staart".
https://inventaris.onroerenderfgoed.be/erfgoedobjecten/200542
Het reduit van fort 4 was vroeger regelmatig open voor publiek. Momenteel wordt het gerenoveerd.
philippec (2020-05-26 07:26:36+00:00): Bedankt.  Ik vind mijn boek van de Simon Stevinstichting niet terug.  
Ik herinner mij wel de term "de keel", of was het "de keelzijde'.
Ik vind eigenlijk niets op internet.
philippec (2020-05-26 08:06:24+00:00): Ik heb mij er vroeger mee bezig gehouden om het te begrijpen, maar ik heb het nooit begrepen.
Ik denk niet dat Onroerend Erfgoed  de autoriteit is.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie:Vestingbouw
Jean-Marc Liotier (2015-08-05 13:48:58+00:00): Merci pour cette contribution. Au sujet des terrains SONACOS et Mame Dior: il n'est pas nécessaire d'ajouter un node en plus de la surface... L'étiquetage de la surface suffit et le node est redondant - il peut être supprimé.
Joe_Pierre (2015-08-06 23:52:38+00:00): dans quel cas est-t-il recommandé d'utiliser un node?