piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
seichter (2019-02-27 17:39:58+00:00): In OSM there is nothing like the "official location of a name", there are only positions of objects like mountain tops, viewpoints etc. It's completely up to the renderer where and if to place names. Only in rare cases with a peculiar shape of an area where the renderer would place the name at a strange position you may set a node as member of the corresponding area relation with role "label".
Sorry, there is a place node "Parque Ecológico do Funchal" with ID 3995319032. at N32.7080612, W16.9069025. You will notice that if you zoom in: the name will occur a second time to the right below.
BTW: You will also see two place nodes "Chao da Lagoa". I will not touch them: They represent an area of unknown extent and since I don't know the area I don't know which one fits better.
stevea (2019-02-26 02:12:28+00:00): I totally forgot about this drinking_fountain.  Thanks for adding it!
Wilmaps (2019-02-27 01:41:50+00:00): No problem! I love this fountain, the water pressure is so great the water goes 5-6 feet in the air. Also a very interesting placement in the middle of the street.
GOwin (2019-02-26 14:13:17+00:00): This is awesome! Thank you for adding details and helping improve the map of this neighborhood.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67565835
literan (2019-02-26 18:20:07+00:00): добрый день. Почитайте, пожалуйста, в вики, что такое service=parking_aisle. Убрал тут.
mosstreet (2019-02-26 22:53:52+00:00): Ок, поставлю служебные проезды, пройдусь, поправлю, хотя так понятнее)
Minh Nguyen (2019-08-21 01:43:20+00:00): Reverted in changeset 73560487.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67566162
Minh Nguyen (2019-08-21 01:46:18+00:00): Hi, I reverted this edit because it looked like you were practicing editing. It’s OK to practice editing, but please avoid saving in that case, because your test edits end up affecting the live map that everyone sees. If you’re interested in mapping schools, there are plenty of schools in the area that could use more detail. :-)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-06 13:00:22+00:00): you added many roads that does not exists here.
BCNorwich (2019-03-16 15:15:41+00:00): Hi, 
I just wanted to let you know that Way: Dulwich Wood Park (673006335) (a short section) is duplicated. There are several route relations involved so it's not a case of just deleting. It looks like you have recently edited here so I wonder if you could have a look.

Regards Bernard.
MacLondon (2019-03-17 12:53:23+00:00): Hi Bernard, I've corrected this duplication now.

Regards,
Mac
trigpoint (2019-02-27 12:30:39+00:00): Hi, this edit has created a series of overlapping ways. Please take care to ensure that this does not happen.

Also please consider the obvious access problems you are creating when linking public highways via what are obviously private industrial sites. Access tags are vital in this case if we are not to try routing map users through private areas thus damaging the quality and reputation of OSM.

Cheers Phil
jguthula (2019-03-01 18:18:13+00:00): Hi Phill,

Thanks for looking into this edit. I don't know the exact reason for duplication of ways in this case. Both the overlapping ways were uploaded from my team members but changes were uploaded 20 mins apart. ID editor must have shown the second editor the edits already made in this location, but it failed to fetch that data. Will dig more deeper into this issue and see what is the core reason for it. 

I fixed the issue: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67693693

I totally agree to your consideration on access problems, but we interpreted data in OSM can be added to the extent where we have the information and the extra or advanced information such as access tags can be added by the local members who has more context of this area. I believe that can help in creating more accurate and collaborated information. Also from our past learning we don't recommend our team members to add any information that is not clearly visible in Satellite/ street level imagery to make sure top quality data is only add to OSM from our end. 

Regards,
Jothirnadh
trigpoint (2019-02-27 12:43:29+00:00): Hi, this edit has gone very wrong. You have created a route though what is clearly a private area and would have some quite serious health and safety issues.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=52.96414%2C-2.66155%3B52.96457%2C-2.67005 is clearly very wrong.
Please slow down, mapping is not a race,and consider the obvious access problems you are creating when linking public highways via what are obviously private industrial sites. Access tags are vital in this case if we are not to try routing map users through private areas thus damaging the quality and reputation of OSM.
Cheers Phil
jguthula (2019-03-01 18:54:20+00:00): Hi Phill,

Thanks for your comments. Our objective is to add as much appropriate information as possible to OSM rather than adding wrong information. Since we had limited context of this location from satellite imagery we added just the road class and thought it can be helpful for a local member to easily add access tags to this roads. At least to my knowledge the whole OSM data is developed in this manner -"Building data on top of individual contributions". 

Please do understand we are working towards the improvement of OSM rather than damaging the quality and reputation of OSM.

As per your comments I added private tags to this roads: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67695832#map=18/52.96447/-2.66516

Regards,
Jothirnadh
viloan (2019-02-26 02:45:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
davidd21 (2019-02-26 02:58:16+00:00): apartment building
davidd21 (2019-02-26 02:57:47+00:00): apartment complex main office building.
davidd21 (2019-02-26 02:56:17+00:00): Not a farmers market it is the footprint of an apartment building.
Emerson Hill (2019-02-26 03:34:28+00:00): Incorrect Comment.  Using shapes provided by south carolina.
Emerson Hill (2019-02-26 03:34:05+00:00): Incorrect Comment.  Using shapes provided by south carolina.
eggie (2019-04-06 21:09:51+00:00): Eerste edit buiten Nederland.. dus nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen. Bij deze alsnog...
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
DenisJu (2019-02-26 15:54:00+00:00): Përshëndetje Julind,
mirë se të vish në komunitetin e njerëzve që editojnë hartën.
Për ca ndryshime që ke bërë, doja të të pyesja se pse mendon se rruga e shënuar (footway) që kalon mbi rrugën e makinës Rruga Luigj Gurakuqi"dhe e shënuar me vija të bardha është e pakuptimtë?
Besoj se do të ndeshësh shumë rrugë këmbësorësh të shënuara me shumë mund dhe kohë nëpër Tiranë. Ato nuk janë shënuar kot dhe kanë shumë kuptim.
Denisi

(për cdo gjë në lidhje me osm-në mund të më pyesësh)

- https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=67569860
Julind (2019-02-26 18:54:32+00:00): Sepse ato jane pjese trotuaresh, dhe rrethrrotullimi i ka vijat e bardha, per kembesoret. Nqs do te ishte sic propozoni ju, atehere do duhej te shenohej cdo trrotuar dhe vijat e bardha si rruge kembesoresh. Besoj se rruget e kembesoreve duhen shenuar aty ku mund te kalojne vetem njerez dhe asnje makine, si psh te pazari i ri ose rrugica te ngushta. Trotuari dhe vijat e bardha ndonese jan rruge kembesoresh, nuk besoj qe eshte e duhur te shenohen vecanerisht si rruge kembesoresh sepse eshte e vetkuptueshme.
DenisJu (2019-03-01 14:52:47+00:00): Në linkun e komentit të parë (achavi) vizat e kuqe tregojnë fshirjet e informacionit!

Përgjigjja për sqarimin e vendosjes "highway=footway" dhe kalimin mbi vizat e bardha "highway=crossing" në zonën që ke edituar dhe të dhënat që ke fshirë, më poshtë ndodhen detajet në wiki. Mund ti hedhësh një sy.

Gjërat janë të përcaktuara dhe kanë logjikë teknike, nuk është se e propozoj pa u bazuar në atributet e përcaktuara dhe verifikimit në terren.

Të lutem mos i fshi vizat e bardha të këmbësorëve dhe kalimet me atributet footway pa u bindur si funksionojnë.

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:footway
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing

(për cdo gjë në lidhje me osm-në mund të më pyesësh)
mueschel (2019-02-27 13:13:17+00:00): Hi,
you added some strange tags to these buildings:

sagis:Address=716 S FRIO
sagis:EntryDate=2003/04/01
sagis:ModifiedDate=2009/11/24

They don't look like they should be uploaded to the OSM database. Could you check that?

Jan
kre3d (2019-02-27 14:09:24+00:00): Oops. Those are from the city's address database I'm referencing. I'll take care of them.

Thanks!
ervinjoshuadelrosario (2019-02-26 06:35:56+00:00): Correction: I actually made steel pole numbers 392-429 of Hermosa-Duhat transmission line a reference code. Making the steel pole 391 a reference code, however, is in a separate changeset and not on this changeset. Sorry for my error on the description of this changeset.
DemoLogin (2019-03-20 21:22:06+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68353555
user_3022894 (2019-06-25 10:17:05+00:00): Hi obk-theo07,
weißt du zufällig noch, was das hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669719407/history werden sollte? Wahrscheinlich ein Weg mit highway=path, oder? Im Moment hat die Linie keine Tags. Vielleicht könntest du dir das nochmal ansehen. Viele Grüße, Lukas
mueschel (2019-02-27 13:12:06+00:00): You imported a bunch of your internal "splitPoint=true" tags from your QA tools. Please make sure you don't upload such data to OSM.
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-02-27 13:44:22+00:00): Should be removed on changesets/67618142. We check these techinal error routinely, but you find it faster.
 
Thank you so much mueschel.
Jakka (2019-02-26 08:29:35+00:00): Tip: Voor inteken plaats bepaling, ligging is het beter de GRB laag te gebruiken in samen werking luchtbeelden. Luchtbeelden verschillen van jaar tot jaar volgens de invalhoek van opnames. merci en succes
sen_takeya (2023-09-06 03:55:56+00:00): こんにちはミイポンさん、これは本当に洞窟の入口でしょうか？
確認よろしくお願いします。
sen_takeya (2023-10-05 09:07:25+00:00): Removed
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142179295
woodpeck_repair (2019-02-26 09:09:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67575085 where the changeset comment is: revert changeset that moved a node from the US to Europe, creating cross-atlantic streets
nplath (2019-03-10 20:48:04+00:00): Bonjour Alaya,
depuis quand cette ligne électrique est-elle construite? Avez-vous un lien Internet?
BCNorwich (2020-03-31 12:41:35+00:00): Hi, Can you have a look at cycleways Way: 673049034, Way: 673049022 and Way: 673049028 please, it look like somethings gone wrong.
Regards Bernard.
MacLondon (2020-03-31 15:51:18+00:00): Hi Bernard. These do indeed look odd and seem to have appeared since the Cycle Map was last updated a few days ago. Unfortunately my desktop isn't working at the moment so I'm limited in what I can do (on my phone) at the moment so I'm unable to properly look into what might have happened here.

Mac
MacLondon (2020-03-31 15:58:15+00:00): It looks as if https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82866516 might be behind the issue.
BCNorwich (2020-03-31 16:19:29+00:00): Hi Mac, That's what I though as well but I couldn't work out quite what done. I temporarily reverted the changeset but was still no wiser. Please post a comment here if you work out what caused the anomalies. 
Regards Bernard.
MacLondon (2020-04-04 01:09:49+00:00): Bernard, I've figured out what has happened here. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6302908670 got moved (from just south of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6302908669) to where it's now located (the moved node is also now merged with another cycleway)..

The node used to be where the segregated cycleway becomes a shared use cycleway just before it meets Forest Road.

I have left it as it is at the moment, just in case you wanted to check out the anomaly again.

Mac
BCNorwich (2020-04-04 07:12:33+00:00): Hi Mac, I just looked at it again and now  see exactly what you describe. I had established that movement before and that new mapper Ben Fica had somehow inadvertently moved the node when adding a node.

Those situations are usually easy to revert in one step. I couldn't revert this one in one step, it left am extra line to be deleted. I've made the change (in my Changeset: 83061320), it looks OK now. Please check though.

Regards Bernard.
MacLondon (2020-04-04 10:09:53+00:00): Yes, all is back to how it should be now. There were a few 'dirty tiles' at a couple of zoom levels that still showed 'ghost' sections of the errant cycleways, so I've used JOSM's 'Force tile rendering' to get these tiles to re-render 'clean'.

Mac
Aleks-Berlin (2019-02-27 11:46:40+00:00): Hi, please write wikipedia=de:Artikel, not http..,
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:wikipedia
Thanks, Alex
Jose Luis Infante (2019-02-26 18:04:35+00:00): Hola! Moltes gràcies per les teves edicions i per revisar el carrerer de Sant Feliu de Guíxols.
Només un apunt sobre les places: cal etiquetar-les com highway=pedestrian i area=yes i no com leisure=park, a la zona peatonal. En el cas de la plaça de Pere Roig, per exemple, el que has dibuixat seria highway=residential, ja que són vies de tràfic de vehicles, i l'àrea peatonal seria highway=pedestrian.
Si tens qualsevol dubte, hi ha una comunitat catalana que et pot ajudar.
Salutacions!
osmviborg (2019-02-26 09:10:36+00:00): Undlad venligst at tilføje adresseoplysninger til bygninger.
Frutiger (2019-04-09 02:16:54+00:00): Can you please fix your edits. Curtin Avenue does not connect to Remora Rd. I suggest only making edits to areas you have actually visited. Please do not use satellite imagery.
osmviborg (2019-02-26 09:16:49+00:00): Man navngiver ikke drivhuse, medmindre det er en virksomhed. Et drivhus kaldes i OSM for 'greenhouse'.
Hjart (2019-02-26 09:24:33+00:00): "Drivhus" er i denne sammenhæng en beskrivelse, ikke et egentligt navn og vi angiver kun et navn hvis bygningen rent faktisk hedder "Drivhus"
osmviborg (2019-02-26 09:22:51+00:00): Banen har ikke en adresse. At navngive den er også lidt tvivlsomt.
kiaraSh-Q (2019-03-02 06:31:48+00:00): سلام دوست گرامی
شما در اینجا تگ
building
که یک تگ درست بوده رو پاک کردین!
لطفاً از پاک کردن تگهای درست پرهیز کنید.
از اینکه توجه میفرمایید سپاسگذارم.
Glassman (2019-02-26 23:46:54+00:00): Thanks for adding the gate
Myazyk (2019-03-14 16:12:38+00:00): Існує така річ, як зміщення підложки (зміщення знімка супутника відносно реальних координат об'єктів). Тому не потрібно наносити хати на вулицях, а зсувати їх у сторону зміщення. 
Не потрібно позначати проїзди до хатів на подвір'ях, а тим більше позначати, що це вулиця. 
Також не потрібно малювати стежки в нікуди
waldhans (2019-02-26 21:41:53+00:00): das ist komplett unnötig! bitte nicht wiederholen!
René Helmrich (2019-02-26 21:51:38+00:00): Guten Abend!
Ich möchte dann darum bitten solche Aufgaben nicht in die App aufzunehmen. 
Ein freundlicher Hinweis bzw: ein Tipp zum Gebrauch der App wäre konstruktiver gewesen. Wünsche noch einen geruhsamen Abend. 
MfG
René Helmrich
waldhans (2019-02-27 07:35:22+00:00): Es ist sinnvoll, keine default-Werte einzutragen. Ein Spielplatz ist per default immer und für alle zugänglich. Nur davon abweichende Regelungen kann man eintragen. Private Spielplätze (Kindergarten) wurde ich gar nicht erfassen, nur die Fläche des Kindergartens.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Kurt
René Helmrich (2019-02-27 07:41:26+00:00): Danke :-)
Warin61 (2019-03-20 02:48:05+00:00): Hi,

The tag construction=yes is not correct. 
Highway=construction with construction=residential is the way to go.
Myazyk (2019-03-13 22:01:10+00:00): Мар'яно, нащо ти вулицю Миру перетворила із residential у living_street?
Всі вулиці слід позначати як resifential і відрізняти їх від службових проїздів та ґрунтовок
robert (2019-03-03 19:03:01+00:00): But in doing this you've got rid of the extra information the local mapper has added, including the name ("Imperial Gardens", breaking https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=398754) and the surface type.
jguthula (2019-06-03 14:05:02+00:00): Hi Robert,

Sorry for failing to respond to this comment previously. I went ahead and added back the features that got deleted. Since the edits were made long back I failed to back track the exact reason for the deletion of this attributes but going forward will take measures to not repeat such errors from our end.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
damjang (2019-02-26 10:56:58+00:00): Pozdravljen! Ker se ortofoto slike ponavadi med seboj ne ujemajo (bing in druge) so pa bing najnovejše, si osebno pri pravilnem lociranju stavb pomagam z gursovimi slikami GURS: Building outlines in tudi ortofoto GURS: DOF050, ki so uporabne v josm (ne vem za ID) in bi morale biti (vasj za stavbe) najbolj precizne. LP, Damjan
Aleks-Berlin (2019-02-27 09:26:54+00:00): Hi, please write wikipedia=nl:Abcd, not http.., see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
Thanks, Alex
yaugenka (2019-03-18 22:43:32+00:00): Hi. Please don't delete length tag. It is not possible to calculate it for international rivers when working with country extracts.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-03-20 22:15:03+00:00): Caching values of calculations as OSM tags is not a really good reason.

It is possible to use larger extracts or to fetch entire object using for example Overpass Turbo.
yaugenka (2019-03-20 22:33:11+00:00): Both options requre unreasonable increase in calculation resources. It is similar to the use of "is_in" tag which can be calcuated but is still widely used because of the same issue.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-03-23 12:53:03+00:00): is_in is also a bad idea (and more and more often removed).

I will not repeat my edit. But note that duplicating OSM data, solely to make processing a bit easier is often considered as a bad idea.
osmviborg (2019-02-26 09:37:24+00:00): Undlad venligst at tilføje adresseoplysninger til bygninger.
osmviborg (2019-02-26 09:41:35+00:00): Gylletanke & diverse andre bygninger navngives ikke. En gylletank betegnes som 'slurry_tank'.
Myazyk (2019-03-18 17:30:02+00:00): Не потрібно заїзди на подвір'я до хатів позначати, як вулиці або як незначні дороги. Зазвичай, їх взагалі не потрібно позначати, або якщо там справді є проїзд до кількох будівель, то тре позначати як службовий проїзд
Phyks (2019-02-26 13:04:21+00:00): (Re) bonjour,

OpenStreetMap utilise un système de tags (attributs) normalisés, avec des valeurs associées. Sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6302214796#map=19/48.77544/2.32600, vous pouvez par exemple voir que cet objet a un attribut "name" avec la valeur "Boite à livres" ou encore un attribut "source" avec la valeur "habitante […]".

La syntaxe listée sur la page du wiki que je mentionnais était une liste de tels attributs. Par exemple, amenity=public_bookcase signifie que l'attribut "amenity" doit avoir la valeur "public_bookcase". Ce n'est pas une valeur à mettre dans le champ description.

L'éditeur en ligne permet de pré-remplir certains champs facilement, en sélectionnant le type d'objet. Par exemple, ici, en sélectionnant "microbibliothèque".

Il y a une section "Tous les attributs" qui permet également de rentrer les attributs à la main.

Je n'ai rien modifié pour vous laisser faire la modification vous-même, mais voici ce à quoi devrait ressembler la colonne de gauche dans l'éditeur en ligne https://screenshots.firefox.com/BX6xJlvFYLhPE10p/www.openstreetmap.org.

N'hésitez pas à répondre en commentant à la suite ou à m'envoyer un message privé par la messagerie OSM au besoin.

Bonne journée,
Myazyk (2019-03-18 19:05:35+00:00): Існує така річ, як зміщення підложки (зміщення знімка супутника відносно реальних координат об'єктів). Тому не потрібно наносити хати на вулицях, а зсувати їх у сторону зміщення. 
У селищі вулиці нанесені вже з правильним зміщенням, тому їх не треба пересувати (ти того вроді не робила). І будівлі ти малюєш, використовуючи найбільш правильну підложку (Ersy), з найменшим зміщенням, але малювати хати, то не наносити квадратики - то дуже складна робота (передай то своїм друзям, бо я вже замучився кожному з вас писати одне й те). Розмір будівель має бути нанесений чітко по контуру будівлі з урахуванням виступу даху, а не більші чи менші. Також прибудови різні (стайні, шопи, гаражі, літні кухні) тре наносити, як окрему будівлю, а не малювати, що це все одна будівля.
І дерева раджу не наносити, бо не потрібно кожне дерево наносити окремо на карту. Окремо дерево можна нанести, якщо то якась місцевість, де не ростуть дерева або якщо це якесь особливе дерево, що охороняється законом.
Hjart (2019-02-26 10:32:37+00:00): Jeg har rullet denne ændring tilbage idet vi anser cykelbanerne som værende en integreret del af Vestergade og de i forvejen var angivet med cycleway=* tags på Vestergade
twolegs72 (2019-02-26 13:37:26+00:00): Ændringen blev foretaget af hensyn til en ny ruteplanlægningsapplikation der udvikles til Herning Kommune. Herning Kommune betragter ikke cykelbanerne som en integreret del, og derfor skal cykelbanerne være et selvstændigt objekt, hvis vi skal kunne bruge netværket til formålet.
Hjart (2019-02-26 13:52:33+00:00): Ok, så er situationen en anden.

Jeg er i mange år gået efter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning, men  det er selvfølgelig muligt at den bør revideres.
Baloo Uriza (2019-02-27 04:31:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67604423 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam.
robert (2019-03-03 18:52:58+00:00): Is it really Meadowview Road rather than Meadow View Road? If so, I'll add a not:name= tag to make sure nobody comes along to try and change it to match the OS Locator entry (https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=921537)
JodaStephen (2019-03-03 23:38:30+00:00): I've added the not:name tag (hopefully correctly). Live locally, street sign, council and residents all agree it is one word not two.
robert (2019-03-04 21:10:28+00:00): :thumbsup:
Markus366 (2020-01-19 13:57:25+00:00): Hallo MKnight und hotteliene,
ist euch bewusst, dass ihr regelmäßig die edits des jeweils anderen umändert? siehe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79728056
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78928986
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67576175

Vielleicht findet ihr einen Konsens .

MfG Markus
MKnight (2020-01-19 16:59:12+00:00): siehe cs78928986
Myazyk (2019-03-13 20:52:42+00:00): Нащо ти наносиш living_street у тому місці, де навіть стежки толком нема?
Myazyk (2019-03-18 17:36:50+00:00): DPelyp, ти бачив (ла) коли-небудть у житті карту? 
От нафіга на карті робити надписи "будинок", "дерево"? Це ж ітак зрозуміло! ти б краще адресну номерацію хат проставив (ла).
Не потрібно захаращувати карту!
mavl (2019-07-21 13:41:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
zors1843 (2019-02-26 10:41:59+00:00): Opgelet : je had de relatie Zwijndrecht (60887) veranderd in een "waterway".  Heb het terug verbeterd.