piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
4b696d (2018-01-28 13:44:53+00:00): 1. OSM will never be accurate enough for air traffic.
2. There is the rule that for one physical object there should only be one element in OSM.
Have a look at the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Drunway

Your account is quite new so I suppose that you are new to OSM. Some new members tend to make drastic changes to the data because they think that things are done wrong, but usually those changes to more harm than good. To begin please observe how things are done and check the wiki if you are not sure. You also have the option to ask on your local mailing list or the forum.
rwrev (2018-01-29 20:00:44+00:00): a)accuracy - perhaps not, but nice to have as representative as reasonably possible
b)new user - yes
c)one phys obj - may have read that before, suspected something of the sort
d)FWIW - how things are done - you can double check me (tired of counting), but appears that pattern established by displaced_threshold (prior to changes made by uid=1420318) in California/Colorado was to label the (single) runway end or leave unlabeled, and often, though not exclusively, to indicate via node with single point, rather than a way and multiple points.  (In current Mass. data, all blast_pad/displaced_threshold entries/changes are relatively recent by uid=1420318, no 'earlier history' to examine in current data [don't know what DB may have elsewhere.]) 
some Stats
Colo., 
displaced_threshold 6 single label, 5 unlabeled, 1 dual labeled, 
blast_pad, none prior to recent changes by uid=1420318.  
California 
displaced_threshold 12 single label, 12 unlabeled, 4 dual labeled (all by uid=1420318)
blast_pad 10 - all 'recent',1 by uid=3176959, others by uid=1420318
4b696d (2018-01-29 21:52:30+00:00): Just so that you don't get me wrong, 'new user' was not supposed to sound negative.

To be honest this blast_pad and displaced_threshold thing was not widely spread. I stumbled about it at some point of time and I then added way more than there have been before to airports around the world. There is no rule for these appendixes of runways but they are officially part of the runway, that is why I added them as ways and not as nodes.
The wiki says that runways should be tagged with both numbers. I know that some runway ends have been tagged only with one number but there were just a minority on a global scale. 
If you don't know taginfo, check it out. You can display the tags on a map if you click on 'Overpass Turbo' in the top right. It is a cool and very useful tool. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/?key=runway&value=displaced_threshold#overview
rwrev (2018-01-30 14:53:13+00:00): Perhaps the wiki should be changed to clarify that where appropriate parts (blast_pad/displaced_threshold/?) of a runway (end) should be labeled with the (singular) runway(end) they are part of.  There were, IIRC, at least 5 different users with some changes dating back some 5-or-so years assoc'd with the earlier displaced_threshold entries in california that exhibit (hopefully accurate) singular labeling - perhaps some are still available and could be consulted for what guidance they were using.  Per your guidance to 'observe how things are done', their earlier input would indicate singular labeling of those items is appropriate.
4b696d (2018-02-02 08:26:03+00:00): The wiki can be changed but there should be discussions about it and first of all these runway sections needed to be added in the first place. There have been suggestions a long time ago: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Aeroways#Sections_of_a_runway
I suppose that those guys just tagged the runways in a way they thought was appropriate. Did you have a look at this at a global scale?
'observe how things are done' - of course. That is still my suggestion to new members and most of the time it is the right way to go but what I did not mean was observe how things were done 5 years ago. There are a lot of deprecated features that might not be wise to use anymore. Keep in mind as well that OSM if full of errors.
Back to the runway sections. In my opinion these ends are part of 'both' runways as you would call it, because in emergency use of a runway they may serve as overrun areas. That is to say that all sections might be used in both directions, but some only in emergency use of a runway which is still a valid use.
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-27 15:45:55+00:00): HI, I believe there are no restrictions on cyclists and pedestrians using this bus lane, so motor_vehicle=no rather than access=no was the correct tagging. Can you please review and revert if you agree?

Thanks,
Mike
SafwatHalaby (2017-08-01 11:16:55+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
calfarome (2017-07-27 06:28:59+00:00): Hola UR GTO.
Realmente se  aprecia tus ediciones de mapa, y bienvenido a OpenStreetMap.
He notado que movistes  el punto "place=city" cierta distancia considerable.   ¿De verdad estaba en una ubicación incorrecta?.  Aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1688949658/history
GerdP (2017-09-30 06:46:30+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
You mapped a few underground ways here, but it seems you gave up. The ways are not connected and some have wrong tags.
For example, instead of highway=escalator you should use highway=footway (or steps) + conveying=yes
(see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:conveying)
A footway in a building is typically a highway=corridor
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcorridor
Hope this helps?
user_72483 (2017-08-02 07:52:51+00:00): Wieso wurde die B27 zwischen der Abfahrt Leipziger Straße und Bronzeller Kreisel schon wieder in highway=trunk umgewidmet? Dieser Bereich ist nicht autobahnähnlich ausgebaut.
firefoxinspace (2017-08-02 16:15:26+00:00): Bitte ‘ähnlich‘ nicht mit ‘gleichartig‘ verwechseln. Die Änderung läuft auch nicht den Wertungen im Wiki zuwider --> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#.C3.9Cbersicht
R0bst3r (2017-08-30 08:23:54+00:00): Dann bitte auch die ganze Seite lesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#Definition_f.C3.BCr_Deutschland
user_5359 (2019-08-19 19:39:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! when ".... CLOSE" means that nobody has access to the road, then use the key "access". And we don't just write the value of the key "name" in capital letters.
Commodoortje (2017-08-19 19:02:06+00:00): Je hebt een bollard aangebracht. Misschien is het handig om te weten dat een aantal restricties dan niet noodzakelijk zijn.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4995477601
het paaltje heeft standaard toegang voor wandelaars en fietsers, de rest heeft geen toegang. brom/snor fietsers zijn eigenlijk niet welkom, mits er een bord staat dat het wel zou mogen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
ndm (2017-07-26 21:27:04+00:00): Undeleted it.

The random line is an address interpolation line -- it is a quick way to indicate a range of addresses.
highflyer74 (2017-07-27 17:20:59+00:00): Hallo Red911 und willkommen bei OSM!

Der Brunnen ist bereits gemappt gewesen. Ich habe die von Dir hinzugefügte Wasserstelle (übrigens kein Brunnen) deshalb wieder entfernt. Bitte achte immer darauf, ob bereits Objekte als Node, Way oder Relation vorhanden sind.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, bei OSM mitzuarbeiten, würde ich Dir empfehlen, einen richtigen Editor wie iD oder am besten JOSM zu verwenden. Maps.Me ist zum Editieren keine gute Idee, da es nicht den aktuellen Stand der Datenbank abbildet und es somit oft zu Doppeleintragungen und anderen Problemen kommt (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits).

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Harald Hartmann (2017-07-27 15:07:25+00:00): Hallo Ropino. Wie kommst du darauf, Biberschlag nach "suburb" zu verschieben?
Ropino (2017-07-27 17:16:43+00:00): Hallo Harald,
...zum ein auf Grund der 'boundary'-Relation 'Biberau', zum anderen siehe hier:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biberau
Grüße
Robert
Harald Hartmann (2017-07-27 18:43:49+00:00): Wird leider aber offiziell gar nicht mehr geführt, nicht mal im Sprachgebrauch. Desweiteren ziehe ich es aktuell vor, addr: nach navigatorischer Sicht und den Namen auf dem Ortseingangsschild zu taggen. Gemeinde Schleusegrund ist desweiteren nur ein politischer Gemeindename. Ich habe diesen Änderungssatz daher wieder rückgängig gemacht.

PS: Ich frage mich allerdings, wieso du dann nach Studium des Wikipedia Artikels nicht gleich mit Lichtenau, Engenstein und Tellerhammer weitergemacht hast?!
sommerluk (2017-07-27 22:26:39+00:00): 👍 Merci !
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-08-16 11:10:55+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
freeExec (2017-07-27 07:00:14+00:00): Зачем вы создаёте отношение для травы, если там всего лишь один полигон?
AntonSmr (2017-07-27 09:33:45+00:00): Чтобы упростить дополнение к нему других участков в будущем. Сбоку на снимке виден кустарник, или низкорослый лес, после посещения этих мест будет ясно, добавлять это или нет.
StephaneP (2018-08-24 13:17:08+00:00): Bonjour Sébastien,
J'ai repéré cette piste cyclable que tu as ajoutée : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510570249
Elle n'est connectée à rien, ce qui la rend inutilisable pour le moment, et l'image aérienne ne me permet de voir ce qu'il y a sous les voies de chemin de fer.
Quelle type de voie se trouve ici ?

A bientôt

Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
sebscholler (2018-08-25 21:47:56+00:00): Bonjour Stephane, c'est un parking auto qui est sous la voie de chemin de fer. Au lieu de circuler sur Avenue Menelotte, on peu circuler à vélo sous la voie de chemin de fer (dans le parking). Ce n'est effectivement connecté à rien d'autre (de mémoire). Je passe souvent à proximité, j'irai vérifier.
StephaneP (2018-08-27 08:40:57+00:00): Merci pour ta réponse.
Ok, donc à priori, ce n'est pas une piste cyclable, qui doit être une voie séparée des voies destinées aux voitures. S'il y a une séparation faites avec des bandes peintes au sol, c'est une bande cyclable.

Dans le cas présent, il faudrait plutôt tracer les voies du parking (highway=service + service=parking_aisle), et ajouter dessus les informations spécifiques pour les cyclistes, s'il y en a.

N'hésite pas à prendre des photos et les partager sur www.mapillary.com
Ils ont une appli ios et android.

N'hésite pas à ma tenir au courant et/ou si tu as des questions.

Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Jon Hanson (2017-11-30 19:32:28+00:00): Please see the note I left for this change set: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1222071.
ivanbranco (2021-07-02 18:44:02+00:00): Cosa sono fisicamente questi indicatori di direzione? Cartelli?
rossi virgilio (2021-07-03 06:36:06+00:00): si, in effetti sono delle frecce indicatrici
jptolosa (2017-07-27 00:25:36+00:00): La región como tal aún no existe mientras no se promulgue el proyecto de ley. Me parece que se debía esperar hasta ese momento antes de intervenir el mapa.
Julio_Costa_Zambelli (2017-07-27 01:33:19+00:00): Si bien es cierto que la promulgación de la ley -ya aprobada en su tercer tramite en el Senado- por parte del Ejecutivo tomará unos 25 días más, no existe ningún dato desconocido respecto de la nueva región y sus tres provincias. De hecho, los únicos campos por completar, y cuyos datos probablemente no estarán disponibles en Agosto, son el ISO3166-2 (los códigos para AP y LR tomaron casi tres años en anunciarse desde la promulgación de la respectiva ley) y el dpachile:id de las provincias y eventuales cambios en comunas (16X) ¿Como visualizas que esto pueda afectar/perjudicar a alguien respecto de empezar a mapear el 20 de Agosto? ¿Cual es el fondo del comentario?
jptolosa (2017-07-29 02:40:02+00:00): Porque pese a todo lo que dices está todavía en la fase de proyecto y la cantidad de regiones de Chile siguen siendo quince.
Las reglas del proyecto consideran incorrecto anticiparse a los hechos y no existe necesidad de hacerlo un mes antes cuando es un cambio que no requiere más de 15 minutos de intervención. Ya que la región se creará sobre límites existentes.
Julio_Costa_Zambelli (2017-07-29 03:28:51+00:00): Entiendo que ese es el fondo de tu comentario ¿Como afecta/perjudica esto a alguien respecto de mapearlo el 20 de Agosto?
jptolosa (2017-07-29 04:11:21+00:00): El fondo es que el mapa debe mostrar el presente en la medida de lo posible. Existen etiquetas diferentes para mapear objetos del futuro o del pasado.
jptolosa (2017-07-29 07:18:04+00:00): Afecta/perjudica a alguien porque no se está mostrando información actualizada/contemporánea.
eggie (2017-07-26 21:44:35+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
MMN-o (2017-07-27 15:46:38+00:00): Tackar .) OsmAnd~ får för sig att krascha ibland i Sailfish OS när en ska spara POIs eller ändringar, så jag brukar kasta ut notes istället då .]
tyr_asd (2017-10-17 17:47:03+00:00): Hi.
Wieso hast du den Weg Nummer 10 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510568764) denn (teilweise) überlappend zu bereits bestenden Wegen (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128962795) gezeichnet, die bereits von anderen Mappern eingetragen worden sind?
hubertkr (2017-10-18 05:39:19+00:00): Es ist ein neuer trail, der erst fertiggestellt wurde, allerdings sehe ich auch, dass ich teils überlagernd auf früher eingetragenen Strecken bin. Hab das problem mit josm, dass ich den osm layer ganz schlecht sehe, sobald ich ein gpx als neuen layer aktiviere, daher sehe ich bereits hinterlegte wege ganz schlecht, vielleicht kann ich das Farbschema ändern. Werde mir in den nächsten tagen die Strecke nochmals ansehen. Vielen Dank für den Tip
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 05:39:13+00:00): hey Ivan2020 welcome to OSM, I really appreciate your interest in mapping. but i have observed that you have added a park feature over a set of buildings. could you please verify this. have a great day
nammala (2017-07-27 07:08:59+00:00): Hi RichMan,

Noticed that you have deleted some motorways and added some . Is the area under construction and May i know the source of adding this.

Regards,
nammala
RichManSCTV0 (2017-07-27 20:14:34+00:00): Please read the comment I left with the edit thank you
nammala (2017-07-28 04:08:22+00:00): Thanks :)
BCNorwich (2017-07-27 06:13:43+00:00): Hello There and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just wanted to point out that Caister Hall grounds are not a building. Nor do the grounds extend to the center of Stoke Road and Caister Lane. You've already placed the name and type of building on the building outline, these only need stating/tagging once.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2017-07-27 06:50:40+00:00): Hi, Way: 393986133 is a footpath in part used by agriculture it is in the main trod out by feet, it's never been constructed as a footway. In fact for many years it was left obstructed by those responsible for the PRoW. It's actually only in the recent few years that a mark is made over the cross field section.
Regards Bernard
Tiamate (2017-08-01 10:58:16+00:00): aus Hiller-Denkmal ein Hitler-Denkmal ?
5m4u9 (2017-07-27 04:48:09+00:00): gracias por añadirlo en el mapa!
Iga | Yanosik (2017-08-18 09:54:19+00:00): Czemu służy wprowadzenie ścieżki tworzącej napis o treści "SEX"? Proszę o wyjaśnienia
yaugenka (2017-07-27 23:08:05+00:00): Зачем вы меняете роль label на admin_center?! это же совершенно разные вещи. admin_center населенного пункта - это его центр, а label - это точка, в которой отрисовывается название.
iWowik (2017-07-27 05:41:22+00:00): Вы очень нетерпеливы
literan (2017-07-27 08:48:18+00:00): куча людей добавляет мусор из мапс.ми. Уже пару месяцев один товарищ массово добавляет water_locks посреди улиц Москвы из ОсмАнда (и они так и болтались). Полагаете - их всех нуждо ласково расспрашивать и ждать? DWG в лице mavl'а выразил свою позицию в коментариях одному из таких товарищей - если возможность добавить какой-то объект отсутствует в мапс.ми или ином редакторе - не добавляйте фейки, воспользуйтесь другим редактором или оставьте заметку для опытных пользователей.
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 05:04:52+00:00): hey  Arknor1981, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 05:03:47+00:00): hey Arknor1981, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
freebeer (2018-06-10 19:55:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59720598 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me alpine hut spam
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 05:00:46+00:00): hey  bobhardon welcome to osm, great to know you are improving the map . but you have added a green county park feature over a building . could you please verify this?
pokey (2017-09-07 21:01:58+00:00): Hi, underorbit.

The map says that you made some changes to roads at Exit 6E and Exit 6W on NH route 16. Did you change them to match the satellite images of the area? If so, you should know that there has been a massive construction project in the area, and the roads are drastically different now. The satellite images available in that area are very out of date. For instance, exit 4E has been completely removed, and the General Sullivan Bridge has been demolished and rebuilt in a new location. Several completely new roads have been constructed in the area as well. Unfortunately, none of this can be seen in the satellite photography.

I had recorded several traces of the new road layout and made the necessary corrections several months ago, but those corrections have all been removed. I've asked a more experienced editor for assistance in reverting the recent changes, but I would like to let whoever made the changes know why it's being reverted. I think it was you. Either way, thank you for your work on the map.

Regards,
pokey
underorbit (2017-09-07 21:09:14+00:00): My apologies! :-) I grew up in NH and have had a really dry spell at work, so I've been trying to refine roads that look messy to me/enjoy the satellite views of my home state to pass the time. I knew they were doing a massive overhaul on the southern end of the Spaulding Turnpike, but was unaware that the available satellite photos were that out of date there, or that they'd made so much progress on the construction (not exactly characteristic for NHDOT!). I'm sorry I undid your work...thank you for letting me know, and I'll be more careful in the future.
-Rick
pokey (2017-09-07 21:22:03+00:00): Thanks, Rick. 
Yeah, they've really put our toll money to work. The general Sullivan isn't complete yet, but you should see the new Memorial Bridge (from downtown Portsmouth to Kittery). Its beautiful. They have also torn down the Sarah Long bridge, and the new one is under construction. I can't wait to see it complete. The old one was a disaster waiting to happen. I think the new General Sullivan will be 6-8 lanes when its done.
underorbit (2017-09-07 21:23:48+00:00): I'll be visiting summer 2018 and can't wait to see it all! :-) Particularly all the new bridges - hopefully the General Sullivan is closer to completion by then. I also REALLY need to see what they've done with I-93...
imperialmog (2017-07-27 14:25:12+00:00): When they do start the library construction can further edit the area with landuse=construction

Also not sure if you saw i started touching up and adding things in this area since its where i grew up. Added detail to your work and updating things.
jaychris14 (2017-07-27 20:44:01+00:00): Last report construction will begin toward the fall or the end of the year per the Fenton Newsletter. This was not an eminent domain issue.
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 04:57:25+00:00): hey MadCat86 welcome to OSM, it really nice to see many more volunteering to improve map. but i have observed some green spaces that were added , which did not match the imagery. i have deleted these features. have great day
eggie (2017-07-27 16:41:17+00:00): prima zo!
eggie (2017-07-27 16:44:03+00:00): Voor de "nettigheid" zou je dat voetpad nog even van het gebouw (zuidkant) kunnen halen. :)
eggie (2017-07-27 08:32:52+00:00): Die scholen zijn heel lastig. Er is een draadje op het forum over  te vinden. 
Vaak zie je dat ale gegevens dan toch weer op het schoolterrein staan om te voorkomen dat je twee poi's ziet.
mavl (2017-07-27 16:47:50+00:00): Hello. This relation is not Tyumen city. This relation is Tyumen Okrug (administrative unit). This changeset is wrong.
Nakaner (2017-07-27 08:19:05+00:00): Hallo Bigdogwalker,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Wenn der Weg kein verpflichtender, sondern nur noch ein optionaler Radweg ist, ist bicycle=designated falsch. Nimm besser highway=footway + bicycle=yes und dazu der Eindeutigkeit halber noch traffic_sign=DE:239;DE:1022-10. Siehe auch http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=239,1022-10

Die Tags kannst du unter "Alle Eigenschaften" im iD-Editor eintragen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Bigdogwalker (2017-08-01 14:44:55+00:00): Danke für den Tipp, hab's geändert.
Gruß
Obelix
eggie (2017-07-27 08:28:55+00:00): oke..prima
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 04:47:32+00:00): hey 웃는남자 welcome to OSM, i appreciate your interest in mapping, but i also noticed that the park that is traced by you is not coinciding with the imagery. could you please look into this . have a nice day
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 06:18:53+00:00): hey 웃는남자 welcome to OSM, i appreciate your interest in mapping, but i realise that you have changed the tag of an entire land use to a park, which is causing the render. bad. I am reverting this changeset. please add the reality to the map and make it navigable. have a great day
웃는남자 (2017-07-28 14:57:47+00:00): hey oormilavinod, i surprised at an unexpected reply. because the cunstuction is over
how can i show you that changed images?
SafwatHalaby (2017-08-01 11:20:10+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
eggie (2017-07-27 08:03:19+00:00): Hier verander je de landuse in residential.
Dat zal niet de bedoeling zijn.
Nu krijg je residential op residential. 
residential betekent bebouwde kom.
Achter de woningen aan de Breksdyk heb je akkerland gemaakt. Klopt dat?
Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-07-27 08:51:50+00:00): landuse 3dshapes hersteld. nu weer landuse=grass ipv residential.
Wanneer het akkertjes "Farmland"  tussen de huizen een volkstuincomplex is, dan landuse=allotments.., maar dat zul je als lokale mapper beter zelf kunnen beslissen.