piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SiHollett (2019-11-20 22:18:11+00:00): A previous conversation on here suggested that boundary=national_park was a legacy tag and boundary=protected_area was now the UK norm for National Parks. I believe this was the last (in England at least) to change to the more generic tag, as well as more consistently to other similar protected areas.

I say better because the protect_class tag helps define what "National Park" (or whatever protected area the boundary represents) means. The UK's national parks have hardly any of the typical criteria (state land ownership, IUCN classification of I to III rather than the UK's level V) seen in other countries. As such, the added detail is useful as tag=national_park might be a little misleading.
SiHollett (2019-11-20 22:22:53+00:00): I deleted the bit with better. I meant "change to the more generic, but better as well as more consistent with other similar protected areas".
SomeoneElse (2019-11-20 22:23:13+00:00): Thanks - I'm currently looking at what tags are used for "this sort of thing" - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Oi2 is the list for the UK.
SomeoneElse (2019-11-20 23:04:04+00:00): ... and for completeness the relevant change which will cause more to show up at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=8&lat=54.385&lon=-2.019 is https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua#L671
DaveF (2020-01-18 23:06:59+00:00): @Someone Else
I updated the other National Parks recently & the world appears to still be turning. I think the primary tag to cover all, & then sub-tag to list specific types is a much more adaptable schema. It's similar to 'natural=water, water=*' although I think protected_area=*' would have been more desirable than 'designation=*' 
I've tweaked your OP query to include 'national_scenic_area' which is specific to Scotland
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/PSI

I'm unsure why the some of the designation values are capitalized with spaces. OSM convention is, unless they were names, they should be lowercase & underscored. I think they should be converted.
SiHollett (2020-01-23 19:36:28+00:00): @DaveF
Looking, it seems like the field that should be used (per the wiki, as opposed to what was used on the English areas that used this sort of tagging that I then copied) for the designation is 'protection_title' (though I think your idea is good - it's like 'x=construction', 'construction=*')
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:protection_title

I don't know why some aren't lower-case and with spaces not underscores - I may have accidentally done them, they may be legacy tags.

As far as I'm concerned, feel free to tag how you want, as long the data is there, preferably rendering...
Leo Slager (2019-08-24 00:57:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
frosm (2019-08-23 13:32:09+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
qu'est devenu le batiment qui se trouvait là oü vous avez renseigné le parc ?
généralement on évite de superposer les objets (l'intérieur du bâtiment n'est pas un parc)
Hjart (2019-08-23 14:22:30+00:00): Bemærk at du i iD kan gøre bygninger mm pænt retvinklede ved at trykke 'S' eller højreklikke på dem og vælge den relevante ikon i menuen ved musen.
Helt Ude i Skoven (2019-08-24 09:39:44+00:00): Tak! :-)
Leo Slager (2019-08-23 23:31:50+00:00): Met de meest W boom is iets fout gegaan.
Hier kun je dat zien:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73667272
Herstel je dat zelf ?
Tijgerd (2019-08-26 06:11:52+00:00): Ik heb hier voornamelijk de wijziging "detonation" toegepast welke overigens staat vermeld onder: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:denotation
Zou jij kunnen toelichten wat de fout is? dan pas ik dit z.s.m. aan.
Leo Slager (2019-08-26 08:26:39+00:00): Bij de meest W boom staat nu detonation=av.
Dat kun je hier zien:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73667272
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
berndw (2019-08-24 10:32:49+00:00): Damit das in der Karte zu sehen ist, müsste noch ein Eigenschaftsschlüssel an den POI
sport=horse_riding in Verbindung mit club=sport sollte hier passen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sport

Wenn es nur ein Büro ist, passt etwas von hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office
berndw (2019-08-24 10:34:45+00:00): Bei Reitanlagen passt auch leisure=horse_riding
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:leisure
DD1GJ (2019-08-24 13:53:09+00:00): Da werden momenan Daten zweifelhafter Herkunft für ein anderes Geoportal eingetragen, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73634853
alester (2019-08-23 15:48:03+00:00): The footway you created is overlapping Kings Road. Has this section of road been closed and changed to a footpath? If so, that section of Kings Road should be removed so cars don't still try to drive down it.
sssmc (2019-08-26 00:44:00+00:00): Repeating here what i said in the note:
Might still a proposed project, no construction or changes seem to have been made to Kings Rd that are mapable. It seem like the whole road has been designated as a walkable street, but local vehicle traffic is still permitted. Not sure if physical changes are planed the the future. Maybe someone that is a part of the organization could add more details. A few links: 
http://irmstrategies.com/content/oaklands-rise-living-streets-woonerf 
https://www.facebook.com/oaklandsrise/

If nothing is heard from the original user soon, the trail should probably be removed
alester (2019-08-26 18:47:27+00:00): From what I understand of the proposal, the result when complete would best be mapped as highway=living_street, so highway=footway wouldn't be used anyway. We can give the original contributor a bit more time to explain, but then I agree that the footway should be removed, especially if there haven't actually been any changes on-the-ground yet.
ORW (2021-01-21 20:34:11+00:00): Greetings, and apologies for such a late response to these comments. I did not receive any query via the associated email, so did not realize that there was a broken link, ir dialogue happening at all.

Will clarify in a post to follow.
John, ORW Co-lead and archivist
oaklandsrise@gmail.com
ORW (2021-01-21 21:01:51+00:00): Alester: to clarify, our defined area does not cross Cook Street, but does commence at that point. The City's designated people-priority greenway along Kings Road commences at Capital Heights and that is the point at which people-priority signage will be installed. But Councillors and others have observed that the Oaklands Rise Woonerf (ORW) should extend beyond our Cook St. to Oaklands Park intent to encompass the street up to Shelbourne, to the east, and down to Quadra Village, to the west.
I'm not quite sure what you mean about cars proceeding down to Cook. The street provides access to Hayward Heights, houses and duplexes, and cars with a local purpose do use that stretch. They cannot access Cook St. Separately, let me observe that Abstract's  building at Cook and Hillside, though non-compliant with the neighbourhood plan has nonetheless been approved and many are concerned that this adds risk to an already risky pedestrian crossing. 

highway=living_street or any other term is, I suppose, a technical aspect of the project. We would object to the use of "highway" in any form, but I may not understand the meaning as defined in this context.

As for "changes on the ground", please understand that we are four years into this effort to establish a people-priority adaptation of the Dutch Woonerf in a context driven by North America's car-centric model. We oppose the typical costly, time consuming and environmentally assaultive practices insofar as the Lighter Quicker Cheaper (LQC) movement can devise better ways as is happening internationally. Over time, you will see planters such as are already installed in three locations, a visual identity program growing through local ecosystem and compatible plantings in eight locations now, some created by adjacent owners others by neighbourhood volunteers in exactly the community building spirit that grounds this project. This month, January 2021, we will have 8 permaculture students conducting land assessment and design work toward a future implementation in 5 zones along the wide-surface walkway, our people-first promenade. Simultaneously, another UVIC student will be engaged in a directed study to assist in planning toward a future area survey to augment that conducted in 2018. Results of that survey are found on the website at https://is.gd/wuB1rI  (thanks for pointing our the broken link in the listing). 

Please help me better understand how our initiative fits into your rationale at OpenStreetMap. I would be happy to explore mutual interests via zoom or email to oaklandsrise@gmail.com 

Meanwhile, happy 2021, stay well.
John James O'Brien
Co-Lead ORW Planning Group
ORW (2023-02-09 17:29:05+00:00): Sorry for a delayed response. We've been working 5+ years now with the City and countinue to have Council support for action that is carried out through My Great Neighbourhood and similar grant and sponsorships. THis is an entirely grassroots initiative, volunteer led and staffed. A lot of ground work is not visible, though street art / furnishing elements are now in place with much more to come. To ensure momentum during the less active (still lingering) pandemic period, we established permaculture studies via UVIC and are incrementally creating pollinator corridors, xeriscape gardens and a parklette. A storm fallen Garry Oak has been made into 3 benches spaced along the western woonerf, with a fourth underway to complement a "PoetTree" as on of the pedestrian moments of discovery. Pls write us at oaklandsrise@gmail.com if there is more to discuss. JJ
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
emvee (2019-11-24 11:53:12+00:00): Hoi,

Met deze update heb je aparte fietspaden langs de Van Breestraat / Rubenslei toegevoegd, prima!

De wijziging resulteerde echter nog in nogal wat problemen, zie ook hierboven, "warnings:crossing_ways" = 55, zogezegd de nieuwe fietspaden kruisen bestaande wegen zonder een knoop.

Je kan de problemen zien op http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=1070&zoom=17&lat=51.211228&lon=4.410426&level=2&tags=&fixable=, zou je eens kunnen kijken en proberen deze problemen op te lossen?

Groeten, Martin.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
viloan (2019-08-23 14:13:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Dimacn (2019-08-25 03:42:24+00:00): Прекратите добавлять на карту несуществующие объекты!
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
Leo Slager (2019-08-24 01:02:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-08-24 01:07:09+00:00): De brug is vastgemaakt aan het water en de landuse.
Die maak ik even los.
Ernie C (2019-08-26 06:41:33+00:00): Oké.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
korolenok (2019-08-27 14:16:58+00:00): Не делайте фиктивных изменений на карте. Это карта реального мира, от которой зависят люди, это не игра. Загрузка вымышленных правок - пустая трата времени и не допустима.

Для внесения вымышленных правок существует другая карта
https://www.opengeofiction.net
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73670556
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
snikers89 (2021-05-16 08:43:37+00:00): Proszę rozważniej ustawiać ścieżki rowerowe, na tych leśnych i polnych dróżkach, które z faktyczną drogą rowerową nie mają wiele wspólnego. Potem nawigacje rowerowe kierują na te ścieżki :) Szczególnie mam na myśli ten łącznik pomiędzy Powstańców, a Chabrową, gdzie w nawigacji chcąc dojechać do Wyszkowa, poprowadziło przez ten polny łącznik. Zmieniłem ten odcinek, choć pewnie większość tych leśnych ścieżek oznaczonych jako rowerowa klasyfikowało by się do zmiany, jeśli sztywno trzymać się zasad edycji.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
Dimacn (2019-08-25 03:44:17+00:00): Прекратите добавлять на карту несуществующие объекты!
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
parsewski (2021-08-30 22:44:49+00:00): Hallo maptoaster. Wieso ist der untere Abschnitt des Mühlsteiges bevor er in den Panoramaweg einmündet access private? MW handelt es sich um einen öffentlichen Weg nach Servitutsrecht. Anyway, du hast den Abschnitt an beiden Enden mit barrier=yes versehen. Welche? einen Zaun? 
mfg parsewski
geri-oc (2019-09-07 06:35:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432992119/history

https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=sv&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch295=1&ch296=1&ch297=1&ch298=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=129224927&highlight_schema=18&lat=57.5899621&lon=16.5244525&zoom=17&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1

Greetings from Saxony by Gerd
archie (2019-09-07 20:07:33+00:00): Joined node- and way-information. Danke fuer die ueberaus gute Arbeit Gerd!
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
PT-53 (2019-08-24 05:46:48+00:00): Hallo  OSMchecker,
wenn das die einzige Zufahrt zu Gunzenhaus ist, dann ist unclassified die korrekte Wege-Klassifizierung, unabhängig davon, ob die Straße geteert ist oder nicht.
Wenn die Straße schon fertiggestellt und freigegeben ist, sollte das dann unnötige Merkmal cobstrution=* noch gelöscht werden.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-09-10 08:58:04+00:00): Hallo OSMchecker, 
was ist mit dem Merkmal construction=* ?
Kümmerst Du Dich noch darum?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-09-23 11:36:11+00:00): Erledigt
Leo Slager (2019-08-24 01:12:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-08-24 01:19:20+00:00): Dag Daan,

Normaal worden de gebouwen in NL rechtstreeks geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=178140.47278441&geometry.y=489127.18033936&zoomlevel=5

Maar zoals je ziet loopt het Kadaster/de gemeente dus achter.
Je zou bij het Kadaster een terugmelding kunnen doen, door links op het blauwe potloodje te klikken.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
Dimacn (2019-08-25 03:43:02+00:00): Прекратите добавлять на карту несуществующие объекты!
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
Marc_ch (2019-11-11 23:38:10+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai du mal a comprendre vos modifs, à la fois à cause de sa taille, de son descriptif très générique, et des chemins effacés/recrées
par exemple en effacant le bout de route puis en le recréant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/717605053
vous avez perdu toutes les restrictions que le précédent contributeur avant fait et qui reste erronément visible sur le point précédent commun à ces 2 routes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/300406025
C'est pourquoi il est une bonne pratique de rajouter//supprimer/ajuster des points à une route au lieu d'effacer/recréer toute la route en elle-même
user_5359 (2019-08-24 04:55:06+00:00): Hello! I consider the label with Access=private for wrong, because there is a high probability that a gas station or service area exists here.
jhameena (2019-08-26 07:08:25+00:00): Hello User_5359,

I made the edit 'Access=Private', as this could act as a shortcut from 'State Route 81' and 'Claude Brewer'. This approach was suggested to us by OSM community. If there is any suggestion/ advise, please let us know, we will work on our edit. Looking forward to learning from you.

Regards,
jhameena
user_5359 (2019-08-26 16:42:07+00:00): Hello Jhameena, please note the difference between Highway=service, service=driveway to a private building (apartment building) and highway=service for a company accessible from two different roads. If this street can be used as a shortcut, you should set an access=customer if necessary. Usually, however, a router understands that you can drive faster on the main road than on a service road.
gseethar (2019-08-27 18:36:44+00:00): Hi User_5359,

Yes, the router should capture the higher class road as you have pointed out. Thanks for your suggestion - Access=customer. Another suggestion we have received is Access=destination. We will perform an analysis on the same and get back to you. Looking forward for more suggestions from you.

Regards,
Ganesh