piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscscnd (2021-05-29 13:01:10+00:00): Chodniki, drogi dla rowerów i podobne konstrukcje można na OSM oznaczać na dwa sposoby:
• jako tagi cycleway, sidewalk i pochodne, dodane do głównej drogi. Ten sposób wymaga mniej rysowania, daje mniej okazji do popełnienia błędów, wymaga mniej obliczeń przy wyznaczaniu trasy;
• jako osobne linie. Ten sposób umożliwia bardziej szczegółowe rozrysowanie geometrii poszczególnych dróg/chodników.

Ten drugi sposób jest obsługiwany przez większość rendererów i nawigacji, pierwszy ma niestety słabsze wsparcie — jest obsługiwany m.in. w edytorze JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/), na mapie CyclOSM (https://www.cyclosm.org/) i w dużym stopniu w nawigacji OsmAnd (https://osmand.net/), ale nie obsługuje go np. tutejsza „podstawowa” warstwa, czyli styl OpenStreetMap Carto (https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto). Opis tagowania pierwszym sposobem znajdziesz m.in. na <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle>, <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway> i <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk>.

Rysując chodniki itp. zawsze sprawdzaj, czy droga, wzdłuż której idą, nie jest już przypadkiem otagowana pierwszym sposobem — ten fragment Żorskiej był. Nie należy używać obu sposobów jednocześnie. Jeżeli droga jest narysowana pierwszym sposobem i znajduje się w relacji np. szlaku rowerowego lub pieszego, to przy rysowaniu drugim sposobem należy nie tylko usunąć/zmienić tagi cycleway/sidewalk, ale też przenieść członkostwo w relacji na nowe drogi. Tutaj nie było takiej potrzeby, bo szlak rowerowy przechodzi przez Żorską tylko na krótkim odcinku, od Żeromskiego do Miarki.

Poprawiłem w <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105533425>. Zobacz wizualizację: <https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#105533425>.
ovruni (2021-05-28 21:30:29+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado una abreviaturas [0], lo cual es desaconsejado, por favor revise la sección sobre nombre donde brindan mayor detalle sobre esto.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_.28no_hacer_esto.29
ovruni (2021-05-28 21:34:36+00:00): Ademas, el uso de mayúsculas se encuentra desaconsejado también [0] y la etiqueta place=city_block se encuentra destinada a manzanas. [1]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may.C3.BAsculas
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place%3Dcity_block
ovruni (2021-05-28 21:16:25+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que varias de sus contribuciones contienen el texto "LEO", sin embargo esto no brinda información sobre los cambios realizados. Por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios [0], de tal forma que el resto de la comunidad pueda entender en que han consistido.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
ovruni (2021-05-28 21:37:00+00:00): Hola, he notado que nuevamente se han eliminado nodos de colegios para agregar áreas con menor información, así como también modificar los limites administrativos. Procedo a revertir este conjunto de cambios.
saintam1 (2021-06-03 08:42:41+00:00): Hello, I notice you removed foot=use_sidepath tags I'd recently added. I'm not precious about them but I thought it was the correct tagging. My reading of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:foot%3Duse_sidepath is that since the pavements are drawn separately here, pedestrians should be routed to the pavements, not the main carriageway? But maybe I'm misunderstanding something, curious to hear your thoughts.
Mike Baggaley (2021-06-03 09:07:42+00:00): Hi, my understanding is that use_sidepath is intended for use in countries where it is a legal requirement to use the sidepath where one exists. That is not the case in the UK where it is legal to walk along any roadway or cycleway unless specifically prohibited (it may not be safe to do so, but the access fields record the legal status). The wiki page is not quite as clear as it could be, but the wiki for bicycle=use_sidepath is clearer. I'll look at improving the wiki page.

Cheers,
Mike
saintam1 (2021-06-03 09:34:23+00:00): I would've thought it was forbidden to walk on the road itself where there's a pavement, but if you say so. Cheers.
landini (2021-05-29 09:55:18+00:00): Gebäude Kybergstrasse 65. Wo bitte ist da ein Gebäude? Oder anders gefragt, warum malst Du uralte Satellitenfotos ab? Das Gebäude war ein Nebengebäude eins Gebäudes in der Gartenstrasse. Beide Gebäude sind aber längst platt gemacht worden.
Beste Grüße
Rainero (2021-05-29 17:38:04+00:00): In der Tat, da habe ich mich verwirren lassen, denn von der Gartenstraße aus sieht das Gebäude so nah aus, aber es ist das andere nördlich davon.
Uralt würde ich bei den Bayern 80cm Luftbildern nicht sagen, die Befliegung war am 24.6.+13.7.2020. Veraltet aber in diesem Falle durchaus, das kann ja schnell gehen.
Ich setze das Gebäude nachher auf "demolished", dann kann das nicht wieder passieren.
Servus,
Rainer
user_5359 (2021-05-29 17:52:02+00:00): Welocome to OSM! What is the meaning of the tag "Willowbrook CC"="Pro Shop"?
ovruni (2021-05-28 21:48:06+00:00): Hola, he notado que ha ingresado varios nombres de calles, sin embargo varias de estas calles son diferentes a las del INEI. ¿Cual es la fuente de estos nombres de calles?
Saludos
Binco (2021-06-05 15:37:09+00:00): Non è in costruzione, è inutile inserire una strada che non esiste come strada chiusa innestandola a caso in altre strade, attraversando altre strade tra l'altro senza ponti o sottopassaggi come da progetto, il tag in costruzione non ha alcuna evidenza sul rendering finale che inserisce sulla mappa una strada chiusa che nemmeno esiste. A parer mio sarebbe da inserire quando iniziano i lavori.
Binco (2021-06-05 15:38:28+00:00): P.S. non sono assolutamente uno di quelli contro la strada anzi.
hsc666 (2021-05-29 07:33:10+00:00): Hallo Lars Zimt und willkommen bei OSM!

Da hast Am Gatherhof mit nur einer Fahrspur für die gesamte Straßenbreite eingetragen, d.h. üblicherweise können dort zwei Fahrzeuge nicht aneinander vorbeifahren. Das kommt höchstens in Einbahnstraßen mal vor. Was befindet sich dort wirklich?

VG
hsc666
Lars Zimt (2021-05-29 07:42:54+00:00): Hallo, da ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen. 
Die Straße ist in beide Richtungen befahrbar. Danke für den Hinweis. 
Liebe Grüsse
Polarbear-repair (2021-05-29 11:36:35+00:00): Die DL-DE-BY2.0 ist mit OSM inkompatibel. Gibt es eine Sondervereinbarung, und wo finde ich diese?
Polarbear-repair (2021-05-29 11:40:42+00:00): Siehe auch https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2021-May/117321.html
SafetyIng (2021-05-29 18:27:48+00:00): Vergleiche auch den Eintrag in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Permissions#ab_2021
Leider habe ich wohl übersehen, diesen anzupassen. 
Ja, Erlaubnis liegt vor, jedoch nur in einer an mich adressierten Mail. Auf Grund der standartmäßig angefügten Notiz der Vertraulichkeit von Mails der Behörde, möchte und darf ich diese nicht veröffentlichen. Ein entsprechendes Schreiben ist jedoch angefragt, der Mitarbeiter zu dem Zeitpunkt der Anfrage im Urlaub.
Nakaner (2021-05-29 19:06:38+00:00): Hallo,

es ist nicht das erste Mal, dass jemand behauptet, dass das LVermGeo LSA ihm das Abzeichnen erlaubt habe. Deshalb traue ich dem Braten nicht und möchte dich bitten, auf die Nutzung amtlicher Daten in Sachsen-Anhalt zu verzichten, bis du uns die Erlaubnis nachweisen kannst. Bitte verzichte auch auf unnötige Bearbeitungen der importierten Objekte, um ggf. erforderliche Reverts (für den Fall, dass der Nachweis misslingt; ich hoffe, dass der Revert nicht nötig sein wird) nicht unnötig zu erschweren.

Zudem sei erinnert, dass Importe entsprechend der Import-Richtlinie diskussions- und dokumentationspflichtig sind. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Viele Grüße

Michael
Polarbear-repair (2021-05-29 21:30:18+00:00): Eine Geheimvereinbarung zwischen einer Behörde und einem einzelnen Mapper ist für die Zwecke einer offenen Geodatenbank grundsätzlich ungeeignet. 
Beispiele für eine belastbare und verifizierbare Kommunikation mit den Behörden findest du z.B. auf den Seiten zu Berlin und zu Brandenburg:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geoportal_Berlin
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal

Den Hinweisen von Nakaner kann ich mich daher nur anschliessen.
Polarbear-repair (2021-06-05 07:44:58+00:00): Leider machst du unverändert weiter, verschleierst aber jetzt deine Quelle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105862173

Details heute abend. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5108
Hb- (2024-09-09 20:25:41+00:00): Vielen Dank an SafetyIng für den Kontakt zum Landesvermessungsamt. Leider ist ein Layer ungenau, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE_talk:Permissions/Geobasisdaten_Sachsen-Anhalt#Verwaltungsgrenzen_ungenau
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 14:25:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8777713593/history has shop = machinery that was added in this edit
shop=machinery ? What kind of machines? Industrial machines? Washing machines? Computers? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - though maybe new one is needed). Or is it not actually a place where you can walk in and buy stuff? But rather internal company office tagged as office=company?
syntex (2025-07-03 23:14:47+00:00): Ogrodnicze, silniki, pompy, maszyny budowlane - i jest to sklep stacjonarny
flohoff (2021-06-07 10:24:18+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier den weg

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/948290206/history

mal von access=no auf highway=construction + construction=unclassified umgetagged.

Zum einen ist das dann auch nicht navigierbar und zusätzlich der richtige status. access=no kann ja alles mögliche sein. Dazu kommt das es dann in der Karte auch prominent sichtbar ist so das die chance das es wer mal entfernt größer ist.

Flo
segubi (2021-06-07 17:08:41+00:00): Das ist ein guter Hinweis, vielen Dank... ich weiß noch eine zweite Stelle, wo ich das gleiche gemacht habe... Ich wußte bislang nicht, dass man das Tag construction für den vormaligen Inhalt von highway nutzen kann und hatte access=no erst einmal für die einfachste Lösung gehalten, die Router davon fernzuhalten...
Grüße,
Sebastian
ovruni (2021-05-28 22:20:14+00:00): Hola, le habia preguntado en el conjunto de cambios ¿Cuales son las fuentes que ha usado?
geo-redhat (2021-05-31 06:59:29+00:00): What is going on here? Road closed for more than 1 month?
Dimitar155 (2021-06-04 11:06:09+00:00): The changeset that modified this part of the road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/948546737) is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105551345. I'm not sure why it was marked as under construction. Even if there are repair works, they shouldn't be mapped on OSM unless the road is closed for everyone for more than a month. Construction or repair works that last less then a month shouldn't be mapped.
dhimmel (2021-09-21 14:32:11+00:00): I think access=private is more appropriate than access=no for Eldorado’s Community Preserve trails to signify that they are for use by Eldorado residents and accompanied guests only.
MxxCon (2021-05-28 23:47:48+00:00): Hello.
If a cafe is in a wrong location, rather than removing it, it'd be better if you moved it to the correct location.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105514297
tyos (2021-05-29 02:06:07+00:00): There is already a Peet's Coffee by gate B26.
eggie (2021-05-29 05:56:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-29 06:05:05+00:00): Beste Lars Bo
Alle adressen zijn import vanuit het Kadaster. Wanneer iets niet klopt svp doorgeven aan onderstaande site.
Nr 94 komt nu 2x op de kaart voor ik zal die node verwijderen.
96B zou nog moeten bestaan hier?
Maar is in OSM niet meer aanwezig?  

MVG
eggie

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=roderweg%2094&resultOffset=0&objectId=1699100000005733&geometry.x=222763.94&geometry.y=572096.71399978&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=1699010000016504
MxxCon (2021-05-28 23:54:18+00:00): Hello.
It is trivial to see that 687 Boardway building is right next to this node. Instead of deleting it and losing using data, it'd be better to just move the node to its correct location. As such this edit will be reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105514550
tyos (2021-05-29 02:23:55+00:00): There was already a store in the correct location.
Mike Baggaley (2021-06-02 16:39:07+00:00): Hi, a short section is tagged as running along way 715817267 which has access=private. Should this have foot=yes, foot=permissive or foot=designated added?

Cheers,
Mike
Mikey Co (2021-06-02 18:53:35+00:00): Apologies, but I don't know the service road in question, I was just adjusting the Relations which use it (as I intend at some point to do one of the designated Hikes).

It was venredd who originally created this, and priymose who then added the access=private, so maybe of them would know?

Michael
ovruni (2021-05-28 23:28:01+00:00): Nuevamente ha vuelto a eliminar información del colegio. Por favor revise los comentarios enviados.
Saludos
johnarupire (2021-05-29 22:16:15+00:00): Hola Cristian, 
te paso el link al grupo que tenemos en telegram por si necesitas ayuda sobre cómo mapear. 
http://t.me/osmpe
ovruni (2021-05-28 23:22:21+00:00): Hola, los nombres no son para descripciones, por favor revisar la documentación sobre nombres https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
Saludos
Statler75 (2021-05-28 23:30:09+00:00): Used Maxar imagery, which is shifted, so could use refinement when construction finishes and new ortho photos come out.
ovruni (2021-05-28 23:54:25+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en algunas de sus ediciones ha agregado descripciones como nombre, como es el caso de PARROQUIA. Por favor revise la documentación sobre nombre, donde se menciona que los nombres no son para descripciones [0] y que los nombres en mayúsculas están desaconsejados [1].
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may.C3.BAsculas
rthik007 (2021-06-03 11:10:50+00:00): Hi Ma Jenica Stefan Vitangcul,
I have removed unnecessary road which are not required. We cannot give unclassified for small roads which are leading to single destinations 
WAY: 948301465
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105773625
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105515320
VigilantPenguin (2021-05-28 23:44:18+00:00): Changeset comment is a bit wrong, changes are all in King County, and not limited to just those that don't border incorporated cities.
rthik007 (2021-06-03 11:01:46+00:00): Hi Ma Jenica Stefan Vitangcul,
I have removed unnecessary hanging roads which are not required. 
way 948301857
way 948301856
way 948301858
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105772998
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105515447
Mashin (2021-05-29 02:49:34+00:00): Hi,
those those type of trails or roads we can tag as access=private or access=no
Statler75 (2021-05-29 03:45:22+00:00): Hi Mashin,  I thought about doing the private tag, but the problem is that nobody sees that while navigating, especially when alltrails, mapbox, and trailforks load openstreetmap trails. Having it mapped is an attractant.  Case Mountain area is already complicated enough without showing closed/fading trails people should stay off.  IMO, since we know they don't want people out there, it shouldn't even show up.  If the landowners want it mapped, we can let them do it.
Mashin (2021-05-29 21:23:29+00:00): Yeah.. we had extensive discussions about this on Slack. The outcome was that the landowners should contact devs of the app or map and ask them to use access=private/no tag. (some like Gaia already are). If we just adapt our mapping to the apps this will only encourage them to further ignore our tagging. 

Having those roads/paths could help in emergency situations or just improve general sense of orientation. Plus there is already tons of stuff in OSM that is not always accessible for everyone... private houses, backyard swimming pools, military compounds.. It is always up to each person to respect warnings and restrictions in real world and not just go somewhere because navigation sent them there.
rthik007 (2021-05-31 06:24:30+00:00): Hi Kenneth G Batino,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road way 781701468.
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105599499
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105515532
user_5359 (2021-05-29 17:44:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
ovruni (2021-05-29 00:58:31+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado algunos nombres en mayúsculas y también nombre descriptivos como COLEGIO, lo cual esta desaconsejado. Por favor revise la documentación sobre nombres [0] donde se brinda mayor información al respecto.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres
rthik007 (2021-05-31 06:15:35+00:00): Hi Bianca Cadampog,
Dragged the node and fix the alignment of service road way 204083125.
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105598953
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105516400
Warin61 (2021-05-30 07:08:40+00:00): Asking again.

Where does the information par and hole number (ref) come from? 

The name tag is for the name only, not for the reference information nor the course name.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-05-29 07:58:04+00:00): Hi HappyLappy93,

Welcome to OSM!

In this changeset, you added a park over a house.

On OSM, we define parks in a particular way, you can read more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

If you were trying to add something in particular, but you're not quite sure how to do it, please feel free to reach out.

I have removed the park in question.
jfd553 (2022-03-01 20:39:37+00:00): Occurrences of the key direction=forward (or backward) were added on traffic lights at street intersections. According to the wiki, one must use the forward and backward directions only on nodes which are part of exactly one way (which was not the case).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:direction
DressyPear4 (2021-05-29 14:59:13+00:00): Olá, você está usando a camada do bing para alinhar, seria melhor usar a Maxar pois são mais atualizadas.
Adicione uma descrição ao enviar suas edições para que outros possam entender melhor o que você está fazendo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105517760
DUGA (2021-09-11 14:06:54+00:00): Would you please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/948324225/? Is it an invalid data?
ElliottPlack (2021-09-14 21:31:51+00:00): deleted
DUGA (2022-07-23 17:39:13+00:00): Dated data, checking with 2021 PEMA.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829503119#map=19/42.00998/-76.14728
francians (2021-05-29 08:37:20+00:00): Il commento dice: cancellata relazione 303, ma poi hai cancellato la 302... Si tratta di un errore?
Glassman (2021-05-30 23:33:19+00:00): Can you explain why these trails should be oneway? Typically a trail is taversible in either direction.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105520563
dan_mccabe (2021-05-30 23:44:09+00:00): These are both purpose-built mountain biking trails that are, in this case, for uphill travel only (so people can climb without worrying about conflicts with descending riders). They are signed as such -- same as the Master Link trail nearby, which was already marked as oneway.
Glassman (2021-05-31 03:00:18+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me. I should have known by the names they were mountain bike trails. Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking to help improve the tagging these trails as for mountain bikes. Especially if hiking is discouraged.
Jakka (2021-05-29 06:38:25+00:00): Is dit bovenste deel "Kwadestraat" ? op geopunt "Dokkestraat" ? graag bevestiging
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105520809
Jakka (2021-05-30 08:56:23+00:00): Heb info aangevraagd bij bestuurlijke overheid voor verduidelijking
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105520809
Geert Callens (2021-05-30 18:27:04+00:00): Ja, want dat was mijn ouderlijke thuis, kwadestraat 22
Jakka (2021-05-30 18:31:33+00:00): Dan klopt je aanpassing thx voor snelle antwoord.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105520809
ameziol (2022-07-08 21:40:45+00:00): hej, niepotrzebnie rozdzielona, nie rozdzielamy dla każdej małej wysepki, tylko dopiero wtedy, jak są naprawdę 2 jezdnie.
poza tym zrobiłeś dziurę w relacjach autobusów, zobacz sobie na screenie: https://imgur.com/a/zWO2LrL

poprawię to zaraz ale uważaj na takie rzeczy
osmapper7 (2022-05-28 16:06:38+00:00): 请问这些山峰的名称、位置的来源是什么呢？
查看了一下，添加的不少山、岭的位置在地理上并不是一个明显的山峰。如果是传统的地名，用natural=peak恐怕并不合适，可以考虑用place=locality。
wsjangh (2022-05-28 16:23:44+00:00): 你好。因編輯時間較遠，對於邊界的部分信息我已感到模糊。關於白雲山山頭的名字應均來自「萬分之一廣州全市地圖（廣州市政府地政局，1947）」以及「中國國家地名信息庫（http://dmfw.mca.gov.cn/online/map.html）」。山峰名字均標註於相對高程處，故而我覺得使用 natural=peak 是恰當的。
osmapper7 (2022-05-29 03:56:43+00:00): 之前也有mapper根据民国时期的地图添加了山峰，我部分到实地看过，高程有很明确错误，有些甚至根本不是山头，不知道是不是因为勘测错误还是标准位置不准确。感觉不宜单纯拿年代太久远的资料来做图，要使用也应该配合实地考察。
另外，我认为应该是独立的山头，跟周边有明显高差才标注为peak，在广州周边的丘陵地貌，这样的山峰并不多。像白云山区域这些，只是在山脊线上一个小起伏。在地图上标注了密集的山峰反而产生误导。
osmapper7 (2022-05-29 03:58:43+00:00): 退一步，如果没有条件到实地考察，也应该与等高线图去核对。
olo81 (2022-01-20 13:59:57+00:00): Nie wiem czy zdajesz sobie sprawę że ta droga miała pasy ruchu określone tagami! Była poprawnie otagowana. 
Dosyć że ją porozdzielałeś to nie zostało poprawione tagowanie pasów ruchu. 
Dodatkowo popsułeś relacje komunikacji miejskiej.
Dino Michelini (2021-05-29 10:10:22+00:00): Ciao, vedo che sei alle prime modifiche su OSM per questo ti segnalo che hai usato impropriamente i tag name (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names) e parking (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmotorcycle_parking). Se INIZIO OFF sta a significare "inizio offroad" si tratta di una mappatura sbagliata, OSM non mappa piste per offroad-enduro (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Route_types_.28route.29)
Fortu G (2021-06-06 07:20:03+00:00): Ciao, credevo di salvare i punti che mi servono nel mio profilo per poi esportarli su OsmAnd su smartphone ed usare la navigazione. Se sono sbagliati si possono cancellare ? grazie