piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jeslop (2022-06-15 21:08:46+00:00): Hola pacopenalvarez. Gracias por unirte a OSM. 

Quizás healthcare:dentist con healthcare:speciality=dental_oral_maxillo_facial_surgery (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare) se acerque más a lo que quieres representar si no se trata de únicamente de un amenity=dentist (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Ddentist). Lo que no parece encajar es que se trate de un hospital  (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital).

Si alguna de las etiquetas te parece más adecuada, cámbiala.

Saludos

Jesús López | OpenStreetMap Foundation | Data Working Group
MarcoR (2022-06-17 08:15:42+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto/a!
C'era un piccolo errore nell'incrocio tra Via dei Bicchi e Via Balestrieri (due strade non dovrebbero essere mai sovrapposte); siccome non sono del luogo potresti controllare? In particolare, per motivi puramente logici, ho impostato a doppio senso il tratto centrale (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845323640).
Buon mapping,
Marco.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 10:58:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123685493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy edits.  See http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15568514 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6142
luiswoo (2022-06-15 16:38:12+00:00): И зачем это нужно, если карты обновляются от суток и более?
MarcoR (2022-06-17 07:50:45+00:00): Hi!
"Piazzetta Stazione -Parco delle Terme" is not the name of that park (that is already mapped as an area on OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28478704); the locals use the name "Giardini della stazione" but I don't think it has an official name.

You also changed a bicycle rental station to a park (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/7674467755) which is wrong because the bicycle rental station is still there and the park sharing the same name is already mapped as an area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28914049). For more info on what a bicycle rental station is see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=bicycle_rental
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122424218
MarcoR (2022-06-17 07:42:33+00:00): Are you sure there is a park ("an area of open space for recreational use" according to the WIki) inside the hospital?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122424290
adrianojbr (2022-06-15 20:14:13+00:00): Essa faixa elevada já estava mapeada: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8930962295/history.

Além disso não é comum o uso em conjunto de traffic_caming=* com maxspeed=* e mesmo a documentação é omissa sobre isso (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming).

Por fim, não vejo necessidade de colocar direction em um elemento localizado em pista de sentido único e, no caso específico de uma faixa elevada, se a pista for de mão dupla, não faz sentido ser construída em só um sentido (diferentemente de lombada).

De todo modo, tive que remover por já estar mapeada.
Wilmer Osario (2022-06-16 16:01:51+00:00): Hola, le pido amablemente que no modifique la clasificación de carreteras. Actualmente la comunidad venezolana estamos trabajando en crear un estándar para nuestro país:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Venezuela/Mapeo/de_Caminos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
adrianojbr (2022-06-15 20:23:22+00:00): 1. complementei com as tags para indicar que também  há faixa de pedestres sinalizada (crossing=marked +
crossing_ref=zebra +
highway=crossing)

2. O limite de velocidade, definido na via segmentada, deve estar de acordo como sinalização ou outra forma, a fim de que se necessário possa ser conferido por outro mapeador (Nas imagens do Mapillary -- https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/545100336734246 -- não pude encontrar qualquer sinalização).
Frans S (2022-06-22 08:57:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
You changed an unclassified tagged road into a path. Please look to the width of that trace, here about 5 mtr.
This should be tagged as unclassified.
This is a building mapping project. You overlooked these. 
I adjusted these issues
Best regards
Thierry1030 (2022-07-19 20:47:29+00:00): Dag Tom,
Eerst en vooral, dank voor het nog steeds zeer intensief mappen!
Ik heb persoonlijk al veel gehad aan de data die je toegevoegd hebt!
Een aantal zaken die mij en andere mappers ondertussen opgevallen zijn: je voegt heel wat info toe bij het veld "name" waar dit eigenlijk niet thuishoort.
"Hakhoutstoof van gewone es" is een beschrijving en geen naam.
Meer info hierover vind je in de wiki -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Is het mogelijk om dit aan te passen?
Ik zal deze comment ook toevoegen bij andere objecten.
Als je nog vragen hebt nodig ik je vriendelijk uit in de chat van OSM BE -> https://matrix.to/#/#osmbe:matrix.org
Vriendelijke groet!
Thierry
Tom Ameye (2022-07-19 21:58:32+00:00): Dag Thierry, dit is een soortgelijke comment als bij "Hakhoutstoof van schietwilg". Ik werwijs dan ook graag naar het antwoord op je comment aldaar.
mvg
Tom Ameye
kartonage (2022-06-15 16:13:31+00:00): Changeset size not intended - sorry about that.
Thierry1030 (2022-07-19 20:46:17+00:00): Dag Tom,
Eerst en vooral, dank voor het nog steeds zeer intensief mappen!
Ik heb persoonlijk al veel gehad aan de data die je toegevoegd hebt!
Een aantal zaken die mij en andere mappers ondertussen opgevallen zijn: je voegt heel wat info toe bij het veld "name" waar dit eigenlijk niet thuishoort.
"Hakhoutstoof van schietwilg" is een beschrijving en geen naam. 
Meer info hierover vind je in de wiki -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Is het mogelijk om dit aan te passen?
Ik zal deze comment ook toevoegen bij andere objecten.
Als je nog vragen hebt nodig ik je vriendelijk uit in de chat van OSM BE -> https://matrix.to/#/#osmbe:matrix.org
Vriendelijke groet!
Thierry
Tom Ameye (2022-07-19 21:56:20+00:00): Dag Thierry, Ik heb dat toegevoegd omdat dit wel degelijk de officiële naam is van dit beschermd onroerend erfgoed (landschappelijk element): https://inventaris.onroerenderfgoed.be/erfgoedobjecten/133171. Ik heb de naam niet uitgevonden. Ik vind het zeer belangrijk dat het onroerend erfgoed op de basiskaart van OSM duidelijk vermeld wordt. Als er andere methodes zijn om dit te bekomen hoor ik het graag. Zoniet laat ik het graag staan zoals het is.
mvg
Tom Ameye
Thierry1030 (2022-07-20 08:38:34+00:00): Dag Tom,
Bedankt voor het antwoord. Dit is zeer waardevolle informatie die wel degelijk in OSM past.
Alleen dienen er wel extra "Erfgoed-tags" toegevoegd te worden.
Ik post hieronder alvast wat antwoorden uit de chat.
PS: bij deze trouwens nog eens een oproep om ons bij de chat te vervoegen :-)
Thierry1030 (2022-07-20 08:38:43+00:00): "Each item in the "Inventaris Onroerend Erfgoed" has a name/title, but it's not always a name like we use them in OSM, it can also be a description of the item, see e.g. the results when looking for 'arbeiderswoning'. In the case above (hakhoutstoof), I would put the title in the description.
For mapping heritage, I always use the JOSM presents (for Flanders, there's one for protected monuments and one for other items in the inventory)"
Thierry1030 (2022-07-20 08:40:15+00:00): Also note that a lot of (even most?) photos from Erfgoed Vlaanderen have been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Just click on the photo, copy the title and put that in the search box on Commons:
Thierry1030 (2022-07-20 08:41:25+00:00): I've added the Onroerend Erfgoed tags to this tree as an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9820355496
Tom Ameye (2022-07-20 08:44:53+00:00): Het toevoegen van al die tags staat op mijn "to do"-lijst, maar dat is erg veel werk. Een aantal zijn al correct getagd voor Grimbergen. Ooit komt het er wel van.
Thierry1030 (2022-07-20 08:47:30+00:00): en hier ook nog wat meer info over het Erfgoed-project van OSM België -> https://openstreetmap.be/nl/projects/heritage-crowd-sourced.html
Thierry1030 (2022-07-20 08:48:10+00:00): "Het toevoegen van al die tags staat op mijn "to do"-lijst, maar dat is erg veel werk. Een aantal zijn al correct getagd voor Grimbergen. Ooit komt het er wel van." -> prima! Alle begrip dat dit inderdaad wel wat werk is en tijd in beslag kan nemen ...
pantufla (2023-02-18 01:23:56+00:00): Hello, youv'e duplicated ways without noticing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1069977750
rayleigh1 (2025-06-10 13:09:31+00:00): 👍
Wilmer Osario (2022-06-17 01:04:48+00:00): Hola, le pido amablemente que no modifique la clasificación de carreteras. Actualmente la comunidad venezolana estamos trabajando en crear un estándar para nuestro país:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Venezuela/Mapeo/de_Caminos
Mister Kanister (2022-06-25 20:00:59+00:00): Hi, unfortunately, you realigned the platform on the basis of outdated satellite imagery... The redesigned station at Buttes opened just a few months ago and had already been implemented in OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118667371

I will try to update to the previous, correct version if I find the time
ialex (2022-08-29 15:19:48+00:00): Oh sorry, I didn't know it changed recently. Thanks for letting me know!

I reverted the changeset to the best I could. Please correct anything that would still be wrong.
Glassman (2022-06-17 23:06:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122428038
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:40:15+00:00): Here are links to a few sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden. 
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map 
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:39:55+00:00): Here are links to a few sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden. 
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map 
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:39:33+00:00): Here are links to a few sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden. 
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map 
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:39:12+00:00): Here are links to a few sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden. 
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map 
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:38:37+00:00): Here are links to a few sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden. 
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map 
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:38:08+00:00): Here are links to a few sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden. 
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map 
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:37:25+00:00): Here are links to a few sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden. 
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map 
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:37:01+00:00): Here are links to a few sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden. 
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map 
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:27:33+00:00): Here are links to a couple of the sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden.
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:36:13+00:00): County GIS data as well. 
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:27:09+00:00): Here are links to a couple of the sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden.
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:35:48+00:00): County GIS data as well. 
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:26:53+00:00): Here are links to a couple of the sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden.
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:35:32+00:00): County GIS data as well. 
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:26:32+00:00): Here are links to a couple of the sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden.
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:35:07+00:00): County GIS data as well. 
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:26:09+00:00): Here are links to a couple of the sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden.
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:34:49+00:00): County GIS data as well. 
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
SHARCRASH (2022-06-15 17:32:03+00:00): + leaftype/cycle added/corrected
SHARCRASH (2022-06-15 17:33:00+00:00): + tracktype added ¬¬
mcliquid (2022-06-26 15:14:07+00:00): Hi, bist du dir bei diesem Track sicher? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1070001926/history

Ich kann auf dem Luftbild gar nichts erkennen.
OliverPA77 (2022-06-27 07:29:23+00:00): Ja die Traktorspur beginnt im Wald und zieht dann im Bogen in die Büsche und endet ein paar Meter weiter im Feld. In Echt ist sie sehr deutlich ausgeprägt. Auf Basemap erkennt man sie tatsächlich nicht wirklich - aber dafür sind die Spuren weiter östlich auf dem Satelliten gut erkennbar, aber in Echt nicht.
Wahrscheinlich muss ich den Kurvenradius noch korrigieren (Kurve habe ich enger in Erinnerung) - mache ich wenn ich mal mit Handy statt Uhr dort spaziere.
mcliquid (2022-06-27 07:35:26+00:00): Alles klar. Aktuell ist das Stück nicht routingfähig, da kein Anschluss an einen anderen Track. Also respektive eine "Insel". Aber dann scheint das tatsächlich so zu sein. Vielen Dank!
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:25:38+00:00): Here are links to a couple of the sources used to verify the correct/current data for Virden. 
https://www.findagrave.com/cemetery/2171353/virden-cemetery/map 
https://www.facebook.com/VillageofVirden
VLD157 (2022-06-15 18:33:53+00:00): County GIS data as well. 
https://www.arcgis.com/apps/Embed/index.html?webmap=f6a80f5979404546999eda2f4489663a&extent=-112.0132,30.5261,-105.2676,33.5659&zoom=true&scale=true&search=true&searchextent=true&legend=true&basemap_gallery=true&disable_scroll=true&theme=light
Wilmer Osario (2022-06-17 00:59:43+00:00): Hola, le pido amablemente que no modifique la clasificación de carreteras. Actualmente la comunidad venezolana estamos trabajando en crear un estándar para nuestro país:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Venezuela/Mapeo/de_Caminos
EneaSuper (2022-06-16 07:36:00+00:00): Ciao Gior7, queste tue modifiche sono molto interessanti, ma mi permetto di contestare un minimo quella su Pontedecimo.

Credo che sia il caso di mappare la stazione ferroviaria del quartiere come area come fatto precedentemente da camminatoreseriale, cosa ne dici?
Tanto ci sono i tag "stop_position" a disposizione, ergo non nucerà al routing (almeno credo) 😗
Gior7 (2022-06-16 08:01:07+00:00): Ciao EneaSuper, io solitamente utilizzo i tag "stop_position" sui binari + un nodo indipendente per la stazione, come indicato nella wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=station.
Si può anche usare l'accoppiata area + nodo (senza però utilizzare più volte il tag railway=station), ma usare solo l'area credo possa dare qualche problema nel routing, a causa della grandezza dell'area. Infatti come è scritto nella wiki non è chiaro se andrebbe inclusa nell'area solo la zona delle banchine o anche tutti gli scambi e ulteriori binari della stazione non a servizio dei passeggeri.
EneaSuper (2022-06-16 09:12:27+00:00): Ok, allora facciamo così:

- Per Pontedecimo l'area c'è già, bisogna solo modificare i tag della stessa. Poi come detto i tag "stop_position" sono sufficienti anche per il routing secondo me;

- Darò un ulteriore sistemata a San Biagio già che ci sono, giusto per correttezza.
Wilmer Osario (2022-06-17 00:56:14+00:00): Hola, le pido amablemente que no modifique la clasificación de carreteras. Actualmente la comunidad venezolana estamos trabajando en crear un estándar para nuestro país:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Venezuela/Mapeo/de_Caminos
tg4567 (2022-06-16 15:45:02+00:00): is Voltfang GmbH the whole building?
Gero Gerke (2022-06-16 15:57:18+00:00): The building is one level only, with some garages being below it. Voltfang has rented the whole building, but some rooms are sublet to other companies.
tg4567 (2022-06-30 21:47:13+00:00): ok, thanks
user_6110846 (2022-06-15 18:04:54+00:00): переробив межі сіл бо лінія дороги одночасово була лінія меж села і входила у звязок меж села
Lejun (2022-06-16 06:21:53+00:00): Merci de la contribution, attention par contre, pour le tracé il aurait fallu séparer en au moins deux lignes. Là c’est considéré comme une seule voie où pour aller au 2 tu avances vers le 6, tournes à 90° vers le 10 avant de faire un 180° vers le 2, et inversement pour repartir. Je te laisse corriger ça ?
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2022-06-16 08:36:31+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your changes. You updated roads both in Germany and North America. As a result, your changeset spans over several continents. Consider splitting your changes by country in the future, or synchronising StreetComplete before taking any plane. For more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Thanks in advance!
MxxCon (2022-06-16 03:39:04+00:00): Hello.
Please note that it is inappropriate to tag the whole building as a business when it occupies only the ground floor and there are many unrelated floors above it. In situations like this that business must be mapped as a separate node.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122430396
pio2_122 (2022-06-15 19:46:03+00:00): Minironda oznacza się za pomocą tagu highway=mini_roundabout bezpośrednio na węźle skrzyżowania; nie rozrysowuje się ich.
Więcej informacji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout

W związku z tym, przywróciłem poprzednie oznaczenie.
Frans S (2022-06-22 09:22:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
You did not map buildings but agricultural fields. 
A building is rather small, round or rectangular and can be recognized bij the shadow it gives, (means above groundlevel) and traces of human activity. (color of ground lighter)



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122431089
silversurfer83 (2022-06-15 20:13:30+00:00): Source: Knowledge ist auch ein bisschen dünn als Quellenangabe bei der Wege und Häuser neu eingezeichnet werden. Lass JOSM wenigstens automatisch die genutzten Hintergrundbilder dazuschreiben

Grüße
felipeeugenio (2022-06-15 21:57:50+00:00): HOla. Este cambio de nombre es por un error o la municipalidad cambió el nombre?
tiene alguna fuente?

saludos
Luis Felipe Peña (2022-06-15 22:04:44+00:00): Hola, en el plano oficial de la municipalidad y en google maps indica el nombre de Rodriguez Aldea.

Ejemplo
https://sanpedrodelapaz.cl/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/PRCSPP-oficial.pdf
felipeeugenio (2022-06-15 23:56:05+00:00): Gracias Luis Felipe.
Google Maps la verdad es que no es una fuente válida.
Pero revisando el SII, el INE y la página de la municipalidad, incluso fotos de carteles disponibles, la calle aparece con tres nombres distintos (Rodríguez ahora, 5 de octubre y avenida central).
Un mapero que hice en Concepción va a ir a revisar.
Muchas gracias en todo caso.
Saludos