piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Brian@Brea (2016-01-03 03:15:31+00:00): I have reverted all non-Florida changes back. Florida is the only of the Disney Parks that have Fastpass+. All other Disney Parks have just Fastpass
ChrissW-R1 (2016-01-09 11:45:14+00:00): Thank you for your help. I didn't know, that there are two systems with different name.

Are these systems also technically different? Or does they have just different names?
Brian@Brea (2016-01-09 20:00:13+00:00): The regular Fastpass is the basic system (in park you walk up to the attraction Fastpass kiosk and insert your park ticket and get a return time) Fastpass+ Is the new system used by Florida where you make the resorvations in advance of your visit of your attraction/show for the return time. Florida does not (kind of) have park tickets anymore the have wristbands that have RFID tags inside them that are connect to your account. So yes they are different. Florida's are more complicated.
Mike Baggaley (2016-03-22 00:02:49+00:00): Hi, are you sure these conditional restrictions are correct? It seems unlikely that this area would have restrictions on when pedestrians can access it. There is also a national cycle route apparently running along it. I suspect the conditions should be on motor vehicles.

Cheers,
Mike
user_242798 (2016-03-22 09:22:37+00:00): History {5/12/08}: [access=no] + [bicyle=yes] + [foot=yes] + [hour_on] = 10:00 + [hour_off] = 16:00; 
Osmose: Tag hour_off, hour_on is deprecated: [Conditional_restrictions] or opening_hours; 
This Osmose error is chasing me since {9/24/12} ;-) 
So now I corrected tagging not to use deprecated tags: 
{12/19/15}: [access=no] + [bicycle:conditional=yes @ (10:00-16:00)] + [foot:conditional=yes @ (10:00-16:00)] 
Now it is being rendered as unlikely access tagging. Yes, unlikey it is! As you did see.
{5/12/08} a fixme was incorrectly tagged as note: FIXME check access restrictions.
Thanks for your intervention. Re-survey is not an option for me. 
Greetings, 
AnkEric
SomeoneElse (2016-03-22 11:31:59+00:00): @AnkEric If re-survey is not an option, I'd suggest adding an OSM note so that local mappers and visitors can check.  
Changing something that is detectably wrong to something undetectably wrong makes the quality of OSM data worse, not better.
user_242798 (2016-03-22 16:37:55+00:00): http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map is leading in mapping errors detection.  
An error dating back for 2777 days old is not very 'detectably'. At least local mappers have not been very responsive.  
Is it 'wrong'? That's the question. It's at least highly unlikely.  
My change was detected after 93 days which makes it very detectably, by - more - correct mapping of an unlikely situation.  
I don't think it's best practice to not resolve errors in order to make others more detectable.  
Whole area is inconsistently mapped.  
Footway + access=destination (meaning even psv have access to this footway? Foot has no access if not for destination?)  
Access=no + psv=yes + taxi=yes (but Google Earth 8-2015 also shows private cars).   
Google Earth doesn't show any 10:00-16:00 access. But hours_off, hours_on is still found on Friargate (+ pedestrian + foot=yes).  
A [bus=yes] can go in Fishergate, but he can never get out...  
Osmose has more objections/doubts...  
I have deleted my highly unlikely *:conditional=yes @ (10:00-16:00) and changed it into food/bicycle=yes. At least in Cheapside. But again, according to Google Earth this is incorrect: also - some - motor_vehicles have access, only restricted by oneway=yes.  
I have changed all note=FIXME… into fixme=check access restrictions. Which unfortunately will put more 'Need fix' Osmose notifications on my plate.
maning (2016-02-02 17:27:35+00:00): Is it necessary to add diodes? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386570063/history
4437228935 (2015-12-19 09:47:47+00:00): başka açmak istediğin şey varsa soylede yardımcı olayım   do you need any help sir?
SomeoneElse (2015-12-19 20:00:42+00:00): Alas, I don't think that there is an island here.   :(

What there is is a NOAA buoy - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3870646160 .  It even has its own website - http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=13010 , with current weather and everything!
user_599436 (2015-12-19 18:31:46+00:00): I've been using this tag:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dhvac
NZGraham (2015-12-19 07:06:42+00:00): I've mapped situation as it is 'on the ground' today. Very limited access is allowed on the roads shown as 'construction' - they definitely can't be considered to be open for routine use. I'll monitor the area and update as things progress. There will be more major changes once work on the proposed link to Waikato Expressway gets underway.
NZGraham
GOwin (2015-12-19 07:23:17+00:00): Hi there. I'm curious. Are you using GPX track logs *or* Birdseye imagery to trace features?
metaphysikhall (2015-12-31 10:20:36+00:00): Hey.. GPX tracks are made in Basecamp, over Birdseye Imagery, then exported.
metaphysikhall (2015-12-31 10:22:21+00:00): Unfortunately Bing Images used by iD has less detail over many spots in this locality, so I turn to Birdseye.
GOwin (2015-12-31 10:30:28+00:00): Can you direct me to a link to the Terms of Use for Birdeye imagery? I'm curious about their data licensing terms.
metaphysikhall (2015-12-31 10:41:05+00:00): There are several versions of Birdseye depending on the country; I can't find their Terms of Use, just the Buy page here: https://buy.garmin.com/en-US/digital/maps/birdseye-satellite-imagery-subscription/prod70144.html

But it's quite strict though; I'm still on my free 1 year subscription. It only works on BaseCamp and you have to have a device connected to make a download. It's not even stored as common raster formats like .jpg.
GOwin (2015-12-31 11:02:14+00:00): Yes, many commercial imagery providers have very strict licenses. That's why I'm curious because they may have issues with the OpenStreetMap licensing. 

Can you tell me about your workflow?
GOwin (2015-12-31 11:03:38+00:00): Hey. If you want to chat, you can join some of us OpenStreetMap users here: https://discord.gg/0fRISIZ8VwKNK70q
metaphysikhall (2015-12-31 11:09:11+00:00): For now it's just that: Tracing over on BaseCamp then exporting GPX files for low-res spots in iD. Otherwise I just go directly to iD. I've yet to try JOSM or Potlach. :D
Ahh. I'll check out the forum sometime. Happy New Year!
GOwin (2015-12-31 11:12:50+00:00): You may reach out to local mappers over several channels:
For questions or concerns, you may reach out to other OSM-PH contributors through any of the following:

* [Chat Room](https://goo.gl/X2XeQE)
* [FB page](http://fb.com/OSMph)
* [FB group](https://www.facebook.com/groups/175398442797542)
* [Goolge Plus](https://goo.gl/qk7cfn)
* [Mailing list](https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/)

Happy new year!
Polarbear (2015-12-21 19:46:45+00:00): Hi, du hast die ganzen Kirchendaten vom Gebäude auf das Aussengelände gelegt, war das Absicht? Dass das Gelände als PoW getaggt war, halte ich eher für einen Flüchtigkeitsfehler des Erstmappers. Auch die Kita ist ja kein PoW. landuse=religious wäre hingegen geeignet.
geozeisig (2015-12-22 07:18:31+00:00): Das Grundstück und! die Kirche waren mit place_of_worship kartiert. Jetzt habe ich es noch mal geändert und nur das Gebäude damit gemapped. Das ist sicher besser.
Polarbear (2015-12-22 11:11:46+00:00): Prima. Der Erstmapper ist immer sehr präzise mit Geometrien, beim Tagging muss man aufpassen :-)

Dabei stellte sich auch heraus, dass die Kita gar nicht in der Hnr 23 ist, das ist das Gemeindezentrum, sondern mit eigenem Gelände in Hnr 27/29 gegenüber. Ist gefixt. 

Guck mal, die Kirchengemeinde nutzt OSM: http://www.paulus-kirchengemeinde-tempelhof.de/index.php/gemeinde
4437228935 (2015-12-19 10:04:06+00:00): 
Category: Proofread
Derick Rethans (2016-01-11 11:04:39+00:00): Hi!

Somebody mentioned this new building on the IRC channel, to point out that it looked like it was drawn from a Bing projection. In general, OSM should ignore the slanted buildings that imagery often shows, and instead, make sure that buildings are mapped as if you would look at them from straight above. In this case, that would probably mean that the lookout points should hover over the base of the building. And we also do not tend to draw lines on the outside of buildings either.

cheers,
Derick
SomeoneElse (2017-02-19 11:09:40+00:00): Hello CyclingClaire,
I noticed that the whole of a section of the River Worfe http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31176973 had had "ford=yes" added to it.  I guess this happened by accident, and I've removed it in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46212083 .  Everything else is unchanged.  The ford doesn't show on OSM's "standard" map yet http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.69639/-2.33308 because that doesn't show fords marked with ford=yes, but maps that do (such as http://88.99.83.189/maps/map8/map7d.html#zoom=20&lat=52.6964009&lon=-2.333136 ) will show it.
Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!
Best Regards,
Andy
eggie (2023-05-14 09:37:25+00:00): Nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. Bij deze alsnog
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
GerdP (2015-12-21 06:10:13+00:00): Hi there!
You added highway=trunk on this node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2449196324
Was it a typo?
Kiran215 (2015-12-22 17:46:41+00:00): sorry 
now corrected
GerdP (2015-12-22 18:50:16+00:00): okay, thanks for the feedback
physi_retired (2016-01-12 19:11:33+00:00): Hallo,
mir scheinen da ein paar Punkte versehentlich verschoben worden zu sein, z. B. der Node: 2612320109, der jetzt im JHQ liegt. Oder überseh ich da möglicherweise etwas? Gruß, Udo
waldhans (2016-01-12 22:37:51+00:00): keine Ahnung, was da passiert ist. Aber ich habe den Weg "zurückgeschoben". Danke für den Hinweis!
uryevich (2016-01-09 21:42:08+00:00): Здравствуйте.
В этом пакете правок Вы "подвинули" 2 здания: 7я Парковая д.28 и 9-я Парковая д.21. Вот здесь можно наглядно увидеть изменения: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=36043111 
Вообще-то здания до Вашей правки были отмечены более точно относительно других объектов. Сможете исправить?
MCDA (2015-12-20 12:05:50+00:00): Phewwwwww That was some work!
SK53 (2015-12-20 15:11:46+00:00): It's closing down imminently, but I eventually realised that the Geograph picture shows it at the end of the building with the garden centre bit beyond. That gave me a chance by looking at the places I'd previously mapped as landuse=retail. I must say I'd hoped the detective work would have been easier.
Teiron (2015-12-19 21:08:11+00:00): zła nazwa
Hjart (2015-12-29 19:58:22+00:00): Jeg vil gerne bede dig om at holde dig til mindre områder per rettesæt, da store arealer som dette er sværere at tjekke.
maraf24 (2015-12-21 00:48:55+00:00): W komentarzu przy zapisie opisuje się dokananą edycję, a nie zamieszcza reklamę.
Przy okazji-brak tagu głównego, więc nic się nie wyświetli,
maraf24 (2015-12-21 00:46:31+00:00): Salon optyczny powinien mieć tag shop=optician.
smaprs (2016-01-11 15:48:34+00:00): Olá. Por que você deletou esta waterway que conectava as lagoas do litoral?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279132451/history
Sérgio
BubbaJuice (2021-07-28 16:54:43+00:00): Hi bahnpirat,

I was wondering where you were getting your information for the power lines here from. For example, this power line: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177188056

Thanks in advance,
BubbaJuice
bahnpirat (2021-07-28 17:37:27+00:00): Hmm, I don't know which detail you mean? USA has a frequency of 60 Hz everywhere. Worldwide nearly all electric circuits have 3 phases (cables=3,6,9,12). Only exception would be HVDC or 1-phase systems in german-speaking Europe. What else? voltage is the same on every connected line, till the next transformer change this. If arial image uality is high enough, you can see the type of wires.
BubbaJuice (2021-07-28 18:56:27+00:00): I was more wondering about the voltage value. Can you determine it from the type of wire? Or can you determine it from a high quality aerial image?
bahnpirat (2021-07-29 10:08:56+00:00): It is posible to guess the maximum possible operational voltage by the length of the isolators. It could be operatetd on a lower voltage and also on a slightly higher voltage, than written on signs, because there is some security buffer in everything. Like a 110 kV-line can be operated at 130 kv. You can't read the exact number. But if you have a small amount of possible values (138 kv, 275 kv, or 345 kV), you could guess the correct number.
BubbaJuice (2021-07-30 00:59:25+00:00): So I am assuming more insulators = higher voltage?
bahnpirat (2021-07-30 10:23:29+00:00): longer isolator = more possible voltage. 1m or 3 ft = 100 kV. 3m = 300-400 kV. More parallel isolators are mandatory for the physical weight of the line.
luiswoo (2015-12-21 17:44:55+00:00): Можете рассказать, зачем это было сделано?
evgenykatyshev (2015-12-22 07:33:00+00:00): Давай на форуме http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=567346#p567346
reneman (2016-01-06 15:54:55+00:00): Vielen Dank für die "tollen" Multipolygone. Jetzt kann jeder wunderbar einfach an der Gestaltung von osm mitwirken. Aber bitte wundere dich nicht, wenn diese MP's plötzlich wieder gelöscht sind.
reneman (2016-01-06 16:01:31+00:00): Ergänzend empfehle ich als Bettlektüre unbedingt die Einleitung im Wiki zu lesen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon oder diverse Diskussionen im deutschen osm-Forum. Rückfragen gerne.
Zitate: Einfache Flächen werden durch einen geschlossenen Linienzug dargestellt. Es ist empfehlenswert, immer die einfachste mögliche Darstellung zu wählen. Einfache Flächen können von allen Editoren dargestellt werden und sind für alle Kartierer und Anwender der Daten am leichtesten verständlich und veränderbar. Es wird empfohlen, die äußeren und inneren Umrisse jeweils als geschlossene Linienzüge zu zeichnen!
reneman (2016-01-06 16:05:55+00:00): Und noch ein Hinweis: Die Verbindung von Wegen und Landnutzungsfläschen ist ein absolutes unding! Wenn nun wege verändert werden, müssen MP's zerhackt werden! Die Fehler sind vorprogrammiert!
reneman (2016-01-06 16:08:59+00:00): Was du in diesem Zusammenhang noch tust: Du zerlegst Wege in mehrere Teilstücke, die Pflege dieser wird so nochmals kompliziert!
reneman (2016-01-06 16:55:51+00:00): und tschüß: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5754862
literan (2015-12-19 22:21:45+00:00): А почему с link переделали на primary??? Это же линки
evgenykatyshev (2015-12-20 00:14:36+00:00): Какая-то конкретная развязка или вся правка?

Я руководствовался принципом, что если убрать линки, то без учёта многоуровневости связность должна сохраняться.
literan (2015-12-20 10:04:11+00:00): а зачем их убирать? если согласно вики и общей практике линки мапятся именно таким образом, а никаким другим. У вас есть объяснения, почему вы отступили от общей схемы на этой трассе? Все развязки я не смотрел, посмотрел штуки три.
evgenykatyshev (2015-12-20 16:14:36+00:00): Я не предлагаю их убирать. Есть популярный на русском форуме принцип: если мысленно убрать дороги со статусом 
_link, то пересечения дорог должны остаться. Например, обсуждение: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=114857

И по этому принципу нарисовано очень много развязок, и именно эту схему я считаю общей.
evgenykatyshev (2015-12-20 16:17:04+00:00): Вообще, стоило бы это ещё раз обсудить на форуме. Общий принцип, не конкретно эту трассу.
evgenykatyshev (2015-12-22 07:33:23+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=567346#p567346
literan (2016-01-26 13:35:57+00:00): Да, кстати, а почему на этом участке (и южнее, до развязки) убрали теги автомагистрали? Обратите внимание, где стоит знак: https://www.google.ru/maps/@54.7540281,38.144421,3a,75y,178.25h,76.27t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sw6t6G8TT9SV2rIlKZ3e83Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1 - сами переделаете или откатывать вашу правку?
literan (2016-01-26 13:36:21+00:00): пардон, вот ссылка https://www.google.ru/maps/@54.7540281,38.144421,3a,75y,178.25h,76.27t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sw6t6G8TT9SV2rIlKZ3e83Q!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1
literan (2016-01-26 13:36:41+00:00): и еще разок попробую :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/210216276/history
evgenykatyshev (2016-01-26 14:44:40+00:00): Вернул motorway, забыл что motorway в отличие от остальных классов ставится не по важности.
Hjart (2015-12-19 17:54:02+00:00): So, why is there now a building here?
maraf24 (2015-12-21 00:45:17+00:00): Na 100% mogę stwierdzić, że żaden z potencjalnych klientów tych wpisów reklamowych nie przeczyta.
To nie to miejsce i nie w ten sposób.
Gijs Blonk (2016-04-10 10:58:46+00:00): Dag heer
Ik heb van de nieuwe satelliet foto van Google de straten overgenomen van De Verwondering (op een velletje plastic op mn scherm) en die 1 op 1 op OpenStreetMap gezet, maar de woningen doe IK maar even niets mee.
Groeten Gijs Blonk
CJTmmr (2016-04-11 19:31:37+00:00): Die nieuwe foto's zijn echt recent! en scherp.
De huizen zal ik zo een beetje verplaatsen.
Ze zijn nog niet ingemeten door bouwopzicht van de gemeente, dan staan nieuwe huizen wel vaker nog niet op de goede plaats

Leuk dat je zo even reageerde

Groet
Kees-Jan
SomeoneElse (2015-12-23 14:13:20+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386672698 really still not complete yet?  It's been on the go for a couple of years - I'd have thought it'd be finished by now.
SK53 (2015-12-23 17:09:25+00:00): Yup, so would I: marking it as still construction might help getting the it finished.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-24 13:10:25+00:00): Thinking back, I suspect it probably is complete (I'd have marked it as construction when I added the medical centre 18 months ago I suspect).  Would need someone walking past to check though.
Hjart (2015-12-29 19:54:47+00:00): Vær venligst forsigtig når du laver komplicerede kryds som disse. Du havde bl.a. fået lavet hele stykket fra krydset og ind til hvor cykelstierne begynder (forbi Gammel Skårupvej) ensrettet og det duer altså ikke.
Hjart (2015-12-19 21:53:52+00:00): Nu har jeg gjort det her, men vær ellers venligst opmærksom på at forbinde veje og stier korrekt med hinanden (se http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Junctions)
maraf24 (2015-12-21 00:43:14+00:00): To raczej "Kościół pw...." a nie "Parafia pw."
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2019-04-26 12:36:22+00:00): Hi! You added a lot of `leisure=park` but on nodes. It's best to draw an area for them. 🙂
dewnoracle (2015-12-19 19:52:56+00:00): Deleted non-existent roads
mueschel (2015-12-20 16:38:06+00:00): Hi Alex,
am Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254675612 hast du einige Access-Rechte gesetzt. Er ist mir aufgefallen, weil "access" falsch geschrieben ist. Die beiden Keys bus:lanes und bus sind auch redundant und einer davon kann entfernt werden. Willst du das noch korrigieren oder soll ich das machen?
Gruß, Jan
Alex-r95 (2015-12-20 16:53:17+00:00): Mach du das bitte. Danke im voraus 
Gruß Alex
mueschel (2015-12-20 21:03:52+00:00): Alles klar, ist erledigt.
Jan
lcat (2015-12-19 20:36:37+00:00): Привет!
Ты обозначил эти посадки как дачные участки, а на спутнике оно на дачи не похоже. Что тут на самом деле?
SomeoneElse (2015-12-23 14:21:05+00:00): Hehe - I've no idea what "adg" means.  Secret Wurzels fan perhaps? :)
krd_mapper (2015-12-23 20:46:52+00:00): Oh remember now, I made a typo and accidentally hit enter instead of backspace so it saved with 'Adg'.  Can't think what I meant to type.

Kind Regards...Kev
SomeoneElse (2015-12-24 13:11:02+00:00): ... did something similar myself only yesterday.
BushmanK (2015-12-20 18:20:17+00:00): Зачем вы навешали тегов bicycle=yes? Этот тег ставится там, где движение на велосипедах разрешено, несмотря на изначальные ограничения. К проходимости или практическому использованию троп для велопрогулок он не имеет никакого отношения.
srgtrsv (2015-12-20 19:08:09+00:00): Уважаемый добровольный куратор велочайников, спасибо за столь. корректное определение “навешали“  . Нет проблем, уберу этот тэг. Взят был по аналогии с соседней просекой. Удачи.
BushmanK (2015-12-21 00:32:18+00:00): Когда сомневаетесь, как что обозначить, заходите на форум http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21 или читайте документацию https://wiki.openstreetmap.org 
Тогда, вероятно, будете в курсе того, что "повесить теги" - обычное выражение применительно к обозначению чего-либо. И не будет повода, чтобы чувствовать себя оскорбленным.
zimba (2015-12-20 01:39:40+00:00): Gibts das moebelle wieder? War naemlich schon mal in OSM und wurde dann entfernt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/345395727 , und letzten Sommer wars auch noch zu.
mmkay (2016-01-12 22:39:20+00:00): Cześć!

Co do placu przed kościołem NMP na Suchostrzygach - czy na pewno ma sens oznaczanie ogólnodostępnego placu, którego jedynym religijnym wyróżnikiem jest pomnik JP2, jako miejsce kultu religijnego?
B@ART (2016-01-13 08:23:24+00:00): Hi, słuszna uwaga. Poprawiłem zgodnie z OSM wiki na area/pedestrian
Skinfaxi (2017-06-21 09:55:17+00:00): Hej Christian,
jag har sett att Du har ritad in en "highway=path" här utan många vidare adribut. På luftbilderna ser det ut att vara delvis väger. Sadant brukar händer ibland, när man lägger in vandringsrutor efter en GPS track. Jag tycker det vorre spännande om Du kan upplysa om den inritade path är en vandringsled, i så fall vilken, så att vi kan införa den information i databasen.
ChristianA (2017-06-21 10:02:04+00:00): Hej. Vad jag vet är det inte vandringsled här, utan en vanlig stig. Nu var det ett tag sedan men vad jag minns så mappade jag stigar som just "path", dvs det var inte vägar. Sen är det ju så att en del gamla vägar i skogen är de facto stigar numera. Kommer dock inte ihåg hur det var i just detta fallet.
SHARCRASH (2015-12-23 13:31:19+00:00): Bonjour!

S'il vous plait, attention aux intersections des MP. Voir l'erreur sur OSMi: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=5.90650&lat=49.46917&zoom=15&opacity=1.00&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touching_inner_rings_hull,touching_inner_rings,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags

J'ai corrigé.
Merci! :)
kreuzschnabel (2018-10-10 08:06:07+00:00): Hallo Molker, das hw=trunk an der B 103 westlich Pritzwalk ist leider eindeutig falsch. Wenn jedes Stück zwischen zwei Kreuzungen als kreuzungsfreie Straße durchginge, dann wäre ja jede kleine Landstraße größtenteils ein trunk :) Das Wiki verlangt für einen hw=trunk („autobahnähnliche Straße“!) ausdrücklich mindestens zwei aufeinanderfolgende höhenfrei gebaute Anschlüsse. Die (hier vorliegende) durchgezogene Mittellinie wird von vielen Mappern zusätzlich erwartet, aber sie allein macht noch keine Straße zum trunk. 
 
Änderst du das bitte wieder? Das ist ein ganz normaler hw=primary bis zum trunk_link an die B 189. Die durchgezogene Mittellinie kann als change:lanes=no|no oder overtaking=no erfasst werden.
KKS (2015-12-20 01:06:44+00:00): highway=pedastrian використовується лише коли вулиця перманентно є тільки пішохідною.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-24 17:36:32+00:00): Here you seem to have made an assumption that the person whose phone number was listed is the sole operator of the church, and in doing so have removed information form OSM that the listed phone number was for an individual, not for an organisation.  

Please don't make changes like this - it devalues the work of everyone else who contributes to OpenStreetMap.
GerdP (2015-12-21 06:19:18+00:00): Hi Nick,
why do you use landuse=agricultural and not landuse=farmland here?
SomeoneElse (2016-01-07 21:39:47+00:00): Can you explain what this edit was for?  Did you visit these places and survey them?
Reclus (2016-01-07 22:39:44+00:00): No, I didn't visit them. I just changed one not so good format to express the language to a better one so that the same information (spoken or written language) is expressed in the same way in the whole OSM database. Just see: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=language