piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
ajf3934221 (2018-12-14 19:49:42+00:00): meiner Meinung nach service=driveway; unter dem dach: covered=yes, aber sicher kein Tunnel=yes, und auch kein Layer=-1
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65440654
freeExec (2018-12-14 05:51:10+00:00): Может быть это не очевидно, но нет надобности отправлять на сервер изменения после каждого отредактированного здания. Обычно делают что планировали (ну или раз в полчаса) и в конце уже сохраняют правку.
Carto'Cité (2018-12-19 18:29:15+00:00): Bonjour Meersbrook.
Quelle est la raison pour laquelle tu as remplacé les highway=cycleway par les tags cycleway:left/:right=track sur l'Avenue du Maréchal Leclerc de Hautecloque ? Si j'en crois l'imagerie aérienne ces pistes sont séparées de la chaussée par de la verdure, des arbres et des places de stationnement, et ont donc toute légitimité à être tracées distinctement.
Antoine de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
bxl-forever (2018-12-24 21:52:54+00:00): Hello,
Thanks to SIAMU people for regularly bringing updates about one-way streets.
Could I suggest to have a look at exemptions for cyclists: they are very frequent in Brussels and if a street is transformed to a one-way street it is good to know whether cyclists are still allowed to use it both ways.  If this is the case, we add "oneway:bicycle=no".  This is important for routing.
Thanks.
npsiamu (2018-12-28 13:57:51+00:00): Hello bxl-forever, 
We don't always get (or pay attention to) this information about cyclist exemptions but in this case we had the info! I corrected and added  oneway:bicycle=no. Thank you for your comment
sophietheopossum (2019-04-05 15:25:54+00:00): it looks like your intention was a no left turn restriction with exceptions for buses, bicycles and pedestrians; please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68925855 for the alternate solution i used
praeteritum (2023-08-22 04:23:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140208174.
Veena BS (2018-12-13 13:16:04+00:00): This is website link:
https://www.marriott.com/hotels/maps/travel/cptar-ac-hotel-cape-town-waterfront/
gabro00 (2018-12-15 17:10:25+00:00): A Posta adatbázisában kötőjellel szerepelnek ezek az utcák. Szerintem is kötőjellel írandó, bár nem vagyok nyelvész.
tssst (2018-12-14 07:48:18+00:00): То, что вы делаете с картой, называется вандализмом. Прежде чем что-либо править надо хотя бы почитать как надо правильно это делать.
IIIsergyIII (2018-12-14 08:25:24+00:00): Я добавляю на карту объекты которых на карте нет. Я живу в этом районе и знаю что и где находится, но я новичок и могу допускать какие то технические ошибки, что вполне свойственно. Цитата с openstreetmap wiki: "Мы должны знать, что люди делают ошибки, нуждаются во времени на изучение и что новые участники часто нуждаются в поддержке."

Я пытаюсь как можно достовернее перенести район своего проживание на карту. И за свои "косяки" прошу прощения.
tssst (2018-12-14 09:05:35+00:00): Разбираться в правках, в которых на полигон выезда пожарной части поставлен тег "третичная дорога", на проезды между домами и рядами парковки поставлены теги "дорога местного значения", составной частью границ мультиполигона "Яблоновский" становится футбольное поле, само футбольное поле находится среди деревьев, а заправочные станции вместо газонов окружены лесными массивами, никто не будет. Будут это регулярно сносить.
Все пользователи только рады вашему участию в проекте, но при условии бережного и уважительного отношения к труду и потраченному времени тысяч участников OSM.
IIIsergyIII (2018-12-14 09:13:48+00:00): Спасибо. Уяснил. Изучу инструменты и буду стараться делать все максимально аккуратно и небольшими пакетами правок.
tssst (2018-12-14 09:19:21+00:00): Ок. )
praeteritum (2023-08-22 04:08:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140207862.
user_3022894 (2019-11-01 18:11:18+00:00): Hi ReDav - zu dem Asia-Shop darf ich dir da einen Tipp geben? Wenn die Filiale geschlossen wurde, kannst du das Tag shop=department_store durch disused:shop=department_store ersetzen. Wenn du nur den Namen änderst, bleibt das Objekt als solches als shop=department_store bestehen, was bedeuten würde, dass da weiterhin ein Laden mit dem Namen "Geschlossen" ist (=siehe Karte). Viele Grüße, Lukas
praeteritum (2023-08-21 04:16:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140160257.
matthewsheffield (2018-12-23 23:39:37+00:00): sorry, totally a mistake when I was looking at how to create 2 level buildings. I didn't see your message.
pyram (2019-01-04 19:09:20+00:00): Review:
Danke für die Details.
Aber man sollte ein Hotel nicht mit anderen Eigenschaften vermischen, sondern jedes Objekt eigenständig lassen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6184547701
( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Ein_Objekt,_ein_OSM-Element )
naoliv (2018-12-13 17:18:35+00:00): This probably reverts all of #65397318
Basstoelpel (2018-12-16 10:40:10+00:00): Hallo Andreas1970, 

die Hausnummern sollten entweder als node oder an den Gebäuden eingetragen sein, nicht beides. Wenn Du sie ans Gebäude packst sollten die nodes mit Adressen also weg.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
gscholz (2018-12-14 05:42:25+00:00): Hola Juan,
here agin is duplicate node error:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-66.15934&lat=-17.64711&zoom=13&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

I am still interested in the root cause for this type of errors. Did you make any progress?
Saludos Guido
ajf3934221 (2018-12-14 19:59:05+00:00): Gibt es irgendeine Quelle die den Eigennamen "Spielplatz am Weilersbach" hier belegt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65443934
Constable (2018-12-15 08:06:21+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto su Openstreetmap!
Posso chiederti cosa volevi modificare? guardando nel dettaglio la tua modifica alla mappa ( https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=65444038 ) si capisce che: hai cancellato l'officina Corvi (l'ho aggiunta io 2 anni fa, ha chiuso?), cancellato un ristorante vicino Arboledo, unito una strada al punto che contiene i dati di Boalzo ed hai aggiunto un punto ad indicare che qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6135155464 c'è un piccolo paese/frazione, però non hai specificato il nome ad esempio.
Le due attività commerciali potrebbero anche aver chiuso, però il nodo di Boalzo non va bene che sia unito alla strada, va quindi rimesso dov'era. Anche il paese/frazione senza nome è da appurare che nome abbia.
Attendo una tua risposta in modo da riuscire a sistemare al meglio.
Grazie, ciao!
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-12-14 00:42:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
KartaKompass (2018-12-15 15:11:55+00:00): Thanks! That makes sense, will apply the same edits if I see more duplication.
abrensch (2018-12-23 10:09:09+00:00): Hallo wegsam,

wenn auf highway=motorway kein Einbahnverkehr gilt, muss das explizit getagged werden (oneway=no).

Wird im Standard-Kartenstil zwar falsch dargestellt, aber routbar ist die A30 in Richtung Hannover so nicht.

Gruss, Arndt
akirich (2018-12-13 14:53:11+00:00): proofpics of new placement

https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/akirich_pcroom/20983067/786771/786771_900.jpg
https://ic.pics.livejournal.com/akirich_pcroom/20983067/787002/787002_900.jpg
Leo Slager (2018-12-14 15:02:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-12-14 17:52:45+00:00): Dag Daan.. Je vraagt om een review.
Iets is een highway=footway als er een blauw bord staat met de wandelaar. Dus een wandelpad. In alle andere gevallen is het een highway=path.
Dan wel weer extra taggen met vehicle=no als tweewielers ongewenst zijn.
Wanneer het breed genoeg is voor voerwielvoertuigen. (landbouwvoertuigen)  dan tag je track. Een track heeft dan weer een tracktype=grade?  grade1 voor verhard en grade5 voor nauwelijks zichtbaar. Zie ook wiki.
Je "moet" met deze kennis maar eens kijken of je tags hier aan voldoen.
MVG,
Eggie
viloan (2018-12-13 15:10:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Maciej9 (2020-07-06 23:32:44+00:00): Czy istnieje wiarygodne źródło potwierdzające te planowane drogi rowerowe wzdłuż 933?
VA00 (2020-07-07 09:54:51+00:00): Jest cała seria różnych materiałów na fb, pod tytułem ,,Trasy KCH: Idź, biegnij, jedź'' , np: https://www.facebook.com/TCKwTrzebini/videos/trasy-kch-id%C5%BA-biegnij-jed%C5%BA-odcinek-2/2412941322076772/
wvdp (2018-12-13 16:18:28+00:00): Maar zijn het ook P+R terreinen.

Want park_ride=yes is voor terreinen die specifiek zijn aangegeven met P+R.
Leo Slager (2018-12-13 23:04:48+00:00): Dat is niet juist. Zie de definitie van deze tag in de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking

Uitsluitend het gegeven dat hier geparkeerd kan worden en de reis met een andere vervoersmodaliteit kan worden vervolgd is voldoende voor de tag park_ride. Een bewijzering met P+R is dus niet noodzakelijk.
Mod - BNV Mobility (2018-12-14 08:16:36+00:00): Daarnaast plant Open Trip Planner een parkeerplaats die niet gekenmerkt is als P+R niet mee in een multimodaal reisplan. Dus als een Parkeerplaats niet als P+R is gekenmerkt, zal OTP geen reis plannen waarbij met de auto naar de parkeerplaats  wordt gereisd om vervolgens met OV verder te reizen. Dit is precies wat mijn opdrachtgever wel wil bereiken. Multimodaal reizen, waarbij een mix van eigen vervoer en OV wordt gestimuleerd. Dit lijkt me ook precies het doel van parkeerplaatsen in de buurt van OV verbindingen.
Leo Slager (2018-12-15 11:05:52+00:00): Dan is deze P-plaats dus correct voorzien van park_ride=yes. Dat de overheid de bewijzering P+R niet aanbrengt is daarop niet van invloed
Carto'Cité (2018-12-18 21:24:20+00:00): Salut l'ami !
Sur la voie Résidence Marne Brossolette, tu as mis maxweight=9.5T sur 3 ways, or https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:maxweight indique de ne pas mettre d'unité (qui par défaut est la tonne), ou d'utiliser "9.5 t". taginfo montre qu'il n'y a pas d'unité en général.
Antoine.
overflorian (2018-12-18 23:18:09+00:00): Bien joué ! C'est une erreur de ma part. Je l'ai corrigée
Nakaner (2019-02-14 19:44:33+00:00): Hallo an78_qwertz,

deine anderen Beiträge zu OpenStreetMap wecken bei mir Zweifel, dass deine Beiträge unseren Regeln entsprechen. OSM ist ein Projekt, das die Relaität erfasst. Du bearbeitest direkt die Live-Datenbank, es gibt keine Sichtung.

Ich vermute, dass der Feldweg, den du hier als befestigt eingetragen hast, vielleicht eines Tages im Rahmen einer Flurbereinigung im Zusammenhang mit dem Bau einer neuer Straße befestigt werden wird. Könntest du mir bitte helfen, diese Zweifel auszuräumen, indem du mir mit einem Foto, das du vor Ort aufgenommen hast, nachweist, dass deine Änderung korrekt ist?

Falls du erst jetzt realisierst, dass deine Änderungen hier nicht hingehören, mache ich sie gerne alle rückgängig. Vermutlich hast du so etwas wie umap.openstreetmap.fr gesucht, oder?

Du kannst auf diese Nachricht antworten, indem du https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65446648 aufrufst, dich einloggst und dann einen Kommentar eingibst. Diese Nachricht kannst du NICHT per E-Mail beantworten.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Constable (2019-06-17 09:28:18+00:00): Hi there Florian, watch out, the roundabout you added is actually located a hundred meters to the south, this intersection has no roundabout instead.
See note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1815186
Next time if you're not sure about what you're editing, please feel free to open up a note and hopefully a local mapper will show up and help clear things up.
Thanks!
overflorian (2019-06-17 10:10:28+00:00): Hi, Constable, thank you for your message. I remember mapping this roundabout. I surveyed it on-site so I was pretty confident of what I was doing. I made a mistake, sorry about that.
Constable (2019-06-17 10:12:51+00:00): Hi, thanks for your super fast reply. Yeah, we all make mistakes, no problem at all.
Thanks
CapAhab (2018-12-13 20:43:03+00:00): Hello guillemmal, this classification change is unnecessary based on OSM and Argentinian guidelines. Please see https://github.com/KaartGroup/Argentina/issues/1 for agreed upon classification standards in Argentina.

Hola guillemmal, este cambio de clasificación es innecesario basado en OSM y pautas argentinas. Consulte https://github.com/KaartGroup/Argentina/issues/1 para conocer los estándares de clasificación acordados en Argentina.
Ryzen (2018-12-14 15:21:45+00:00): Of course all islands will be mapped from scratch over the next months.
abakus_uploader (2018-12-13 23:30:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
CapAhab (2018-12-13 20:42:36+00:00): Hello guillemmal, this classification change is unnecessary based on OSM and Argentinian guidelines. Please see https://github.com/KaartGroup/Argentina/issues/1 for agreed upon classification standards in Argentina.

Hola guillemmal, este cambio de clasificación es innecesario basado en OSM y pautas argentinas. Consulte https://github.com/KaartGroup/Argentina/issues/1 para conocer los estándares de clasificación acordados en Argentina.
geosiili (2018-12-13 22:26:08+00:00): #HOTOSMFinland #FinnishRedCross
Maarten Deen (2019-02-11 14:58:04+00:00): Hi,

in this changeset you multiplied the number of members in relation 2632934. In changeset 67093992 the same happened creating a relation with > 42,000 members (and causing some problems in OSM tools). Could you explain why you did this? Was this an error or was there a reason behind this?
See also this message on the talk mailinglist: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2019-February/082064.html
promiseofbirth (2019-02-11 18:59:10+00:00): It's a software bug in Vespucci. I'll try to be more diligent about it.
SimonPoole (2019-02-11 19:08:31+00:00): @promiseofbirth please do not conflate 2 likely completely unrelated issues.

The issue with this changeset is that you increased the number of relation members from a small number to roughly 21'000 by means of a scripted edit with upload.py 

Definitely this issue has nothing at all to do with Vespucci.

In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67093992 the edit doubled the number of members, now this could be an issue with Vespucci or not, it could be related to the large number numbers of member or just as well not, but you haven't opened any issue on github nor have you indicated that any thing went wrong anywhere else. In any case you edited the relation in question three times previously with Vespucci (with the 21'000 members) without issues, so obviously something was different in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67093992
mueschel (2018-12-23 11:39:03+00:00): Hi,
you added 2 ways like this one, without tags. Could you have a look?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/654769368

Jan
naoliv (2018-12-13 17:18:37+00:00): This probably reverts all of #65397498
mueschel (2018-12-22 18:27:21+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of "vehicle_ramo"? This tag doesn't exist in other places.

Thanks, 
Jan
chnav (2018-12-22 18:50:32+00:00): Hi, it's typo, should be vehicle_ramp, I have corrected it.  

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=vehicle_ramp  
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/vehicle_ramp
AgusQui (2018-12-18 04:28:48+00:00): Las avenidas van como secondary
MatthiasMatthias (2018-12-14 08:20:38+00:00): C'était un erreur. Comment je peux supprimer cet change? (entretemps je vais remettre les anciens données, mais ca m'interesse quand même comment annuler un change).
CapAhab (2018-12-13 20:42:01+00:00): Hello guillemmal, this classification change is unnecessary based on OSM and Argentinian guidelines.  Please see https://github.com/KaartGroup/Argentina/issues/1 for agreed upon classification standards in Argentina.


Hola guillemmal, este cambio de clasificación es innecesario basado en OSM y pautas argentinas. Consulte https://github.com/KaartGroup/Argentina/issues/1 para conocer los estándares de clasificación acordados en Argentina.
AgusQui (2018-12-14 02:52:28+00:00): La clasificación que hay que respetar es la que confeccionó la comunidad Argentina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina/V%C3%ADas_de_circulaci%C3%B3n, y coincide con lo que hizo guillemmal
muralito (2018-12-15 02:31:50+00:00): Concuerdo con AgusQui que la convención a respetar es la definida, y si a esa convención le ven posibilidad de mejoras se plantean igual que se hizo anteriormente. Dicho eso, hay algunos aportes de KaartGroup que son positivos y otros que no, algunos respetan la convención y otros no tanto, pero siendo estrictos creo que lo que les falta es  convencer a la comunidad y logran un consenso de porque seria conveniente pasarnos a los criterios que el grupo usa.
~Jhellico (2019-01-02 18:49:35+00:00): Навіщо змінено на living_street? Там всюди є знаки «Житлова зона»?
Tomas Straupis (2018-12-13 19:39:06+00:00): Rašant adresą būtina įrašyti ir namo numerį (greta gatvės ir gyvenvietės).
openBeeLab (2020-01-17 11:32:55+00:00): L'accès au local de l'association se fait par la rue Tourat et pas Constantin.
Vinber (2020-01-18 17:07:17+00:00): je l'ai précisé dans l'adresse, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5246799747#map=19/44.85047/-0.57279&layers=D
GinaroZ (2018-12-14 12:05:25+00:00): Pretty sure these shouldn't have a name, and should also be tagged as highway=service + service=driveway instead...
Jerry_W2k (2018-12-14 17:33:33+00:00): Zmiany wycofane, nie ma czegoś takiego jak "Kamionka Doręgowic" tylko "Kamionka k/Doręgowic" (w zamyśle "koło Doręgowic"), źródło https://chojnice.e-mapa.net/
maraf24 (2018-12-14 21:18:31+00:00): Nie powinniśmy skrótu rozwinąć?
Andrew Matheny_import (2018-12-13 18:46:03+00:00): should have been uploaded under this account
monotar (2021-10-01 11:20:33+00:00): durchgehende Bebauung=residential? I doubt it, das ist nicht die Definition von residential, denn eine unclassified hat Erschließungscharakter. Hier sind Straßen als residential getaggt die durchgehend 2 Fahrspuren zum Befahren bieten, im Gegensatz zu echten residential-Straßen die oft nur sehr eingeschränkt mit einer Fahrspur zu befahren sind. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4066916/history ist eine Hauptstraße mit 50, das ist keine residential! Eine Ampelkreuzung auf die 4 residential treffen, warum dann noch eine Ampel stellen wenn es ohnehin nur kleine Straßen wären?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2949624623
sommerluk (2018-12-17 15:05:38+00:00): 👍 Merci !
phidauex (2018-12-18 23:13:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! I think the pond you added isn't really a pond, but just a lawn. Can you please remove the pond, or at least change it to "landuse=grass" to show it as a lawn? Thanks!
ke9tv (2019-01-11 22:09:35+00:00): I see that you have removed boundary=national_park from the Catskill Park, causing it to disappear from the rendering on the main map.

Let me please refer you to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dnational_park - where a formal definition is given of the tag: 

A national park is a relatively large area of land declared by a government (just as boundary=administrative are declared/recognised by governments), to be set aside for human recreation and enjoyment, as well as the protection of the natural environment and/or cultural heritage of an area. 

It is not limited to National Parks. In fact, it includes a specific note:

Additionally in the USA, because the fifty state governments are as sovereign as the federal government, some states (notably New York) tag boundary=national_park on state land with "equivalent or better" resource protection.

That is surely true of the Forest Preserve, for which any protection changes require an amendment to the State Constitution - and in fact, a few years ago, there was a discussion on the 'tagging' mailing list that established a fairly broad consensus (there's never 100% agreement) that national_park was indeed the best tag for the job.

protected_area is a better fit for the individual state lands within the Catskill Park - and indeed is tagged on them.

Could I trouble you either to revert the change or to reopen the discussion on the mailing list? (I'd prefer not to revert it myself, never wishing to fire the first shot in an edit war.)
ke9tv (2019-01-21 17:21:18+00:00): Nothing heard from the person who made the change in over a week. I'll presume that silence is assent, and revert the tagging.
neuhausr (2018-12-13 22:36:45+00:00): Thanks for your work updating boundaries. Would you mind including a more specific source link though? The Geospatial Commons has hundreds of datasets.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
muralito (2018-12-14 01:44:04+00:00): Im not sure if this should be tagged as building=stadium. The description is more like bleachers. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dbleachers
mavl (2018-12-25 00:29:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Diógenes de Sinope (2018-12-14 11:48:01+00:00): Hi geo_roads, Although, all the background imagery layers that are available for OpenStreetMap of Angola are all out-of-date, are you certain that 'Via Expressa 'Cacuaco-Dande' connects with 'Cequele-Funda'?, I have never ventured to this location myself, I have no idea what state the roads in this area are in, I assume that this highway is supposed connect to the trunk road 'Funda-Catete' that leads to the town of 'Catete' when it is completed, which I also assume is why it is referred to as an 'express way'
geo_roads (2018-12-14 22:14:09+00:00): Hi Diogenes,
Yes, I am certain there is a road there. However the expressway has not been constructed past Cequele-Funda.