piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Wetitpig0 (2018-01-03 06:52:39+00:00): Closed according to Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hoeryong_concentration_camp
glglgl (2016-11-21 12:46:00+00:00): I am very sure these don't exist at this place, so I revert this changeset.

If these objects exist, but are supposed to be placed somewhere else, please re-create them at the intended place.
SomeoneElse (2016-11-21 16:39:18+00:00): For info, this is the "learnosm" test data.
What's supposed to happen is that there's a big warning in there to not upload it to OSM.  Sometimes, however, that warning gets ignored (understandably - JOSM generates and awful lot of warnings) and the data gets uploaded anyway.
SomeoneElse (2016-11-21 16:40:17+00:00): The relevant link over at learnosm is https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm/issues/335 .
D_Arango (2016-11-21 18:40:58+00:00): Sorry, I was doing some editing tests in a course and I uploaded some changes without realizing it
alphensebezorger (2017-06-08 21:42:35+00:00): Hallo ff5722,
Ik vond dit adrespunt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2728814773. De postcode lijkt mij niet zo bedoeld. Kan die weer in de gebruikelijke opmaak (zonder spatie) weergegeven worden? Bedankt.
ff5722 (2017-06-09 12:35:22+00:00): gefixt
Rom1 (2016-11-21 13:13:39+00:00): Bonjour,
Prenez-vous connaissance des modifications précédentes cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4421749389/history. Vous dégradez la base de données en ne respectant pas les bonnes pratiques décrites dans le wiki.
Merci.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2016-11-21 13:29:51+00:00): Bonjour, 
Désolé pour ce contre temps, mais comme nom de la bijouterie, nous n'avion que Bienfait et non Bienfait lévêque.
Par contre pour le nom de la rue, c'est une erreur de notre part, les majuscules ont "sautées".
Merci de nous avoir signalé ce dysfonctionnement
Cordialement
Alain
Rom1 (2016-11-21 14:12:55+00:00): Re,
Pour le nom, il est bien écrit "Bienfait Lévêque" sur la devanture de cette boutique.
Par ailleurs, les tags addr:city, addr:country et addr:postcode en France sont inutiles cf. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:addr
Quant au couple addr:housenumber et addr:street, ils doivent être uniques. Le numéro 15 de cette réunion n'est pas propre à cette boutique. Il doit être porté par l'entrée située à droite du bâtiment. D'où les tags contact:housenumber et contact:street cf. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_France/WikiProject_Base_Adresses_Nationale_Ouverte_(BANO)#R.C3.A8gles_de_priorit.C3.A9s_entre_sources
Enfin la valeur du tag "website" est bien "http://www.bijouterie-bienfait-leveque.fr/" Commencer par "www" est une erreur. De même pour le téléphone, la syntaxe est bien en accolant les chiffres après l'indicateur régional cf.  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:phone
Merci.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2016-11-21 14:20:46+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour ces précisions

Cordialement,

Gilles
glglgl (2016-11-21 10:11:48+00:00): Nur einen Fall hersusgreifend: Bezieht sich die 19100 bei Püttlingen (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3121123201) auf die Stadt Püttlingen (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1184883) oder deren Hauptort (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4536912)?
SammysHP (2016-11-21 18:27:01+00:00): Aus welcher Quelle stammen denn die Daten? Zumindest für Celle (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/27299841) sind die Daten definitiv falsch.
SammysHP (2016-11-21 18:36:40+00:00): Sorry, here's a translation of my previous comment:
 
Can you please tell us the source of the data? At least the population value of Celle [1] is wrong. I can find only one source [2] with this value. It references the census of 2011, but with a wrong number. The correct value is in [3].
 
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/27299841
[2] https://www.citypopulation.de/php/germany-settlements-niedersachsen.php?cityid=03351006_0
[3] https://www.celle.de/PDF/Bev%C3%B6lkerungsstand_31_12_2011_Celle_Stadt.PDF?ObjSvrID=2092&ObjID=1533&ObjLa=1&Ext=PDF&WTR=1&_ts=
yasio90 (2016-11-22 07:44:18+00:00): Yes, I use this citypopulation site. I saw that sometimes towns or cities have a number of population of whole aglomeration/municipality/commune and sometimes there is a population only of the main city, not including this smaller towns near suburbs
SammysHP (2016-11-22 10:00:33+00:00): I'm not sure if the license of that source is compatible with OSM.

https://www.citypopulation.de/termsofuse.html

Because of these two issues (wrong data and incompatible license) all changesets that use this data should be reverted.
glglgl (2016-11-22 13:23:03+00:00): Generally, I think that it would be better to add a link to the corresponding Wikipedia page (or even better: wikidata object) to every administrative relation (not to the place tags, as this is sometimes ambiguous) and to have people needing the (constantly changing) population by other means.
glglgl (2016-11-22 13:28:31+00:00): Maybe adding another ID, such as id:citypopulation=10045112_0Y4B, would be helpful then IF it was announced beforehand in a correct way.
glglgl (2016-11-22 13:31:01+00:00): Let alone the fact that the results of that site are quite inexact. They ignore the one or other settlement and combine other settlements which shouldn't be, from an administrative point of view.
SammysHP (2016-11-22 13:31:13+00:00): WRT relation: For example Celle already has the polulation in its relation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1797918
Владимир К (2016-11-24 11:15:41+00:00): Если вы расставляете подъезды, то лучше ставить entrance=staircase
Echo78 (2016-11-24 15:14:33+00:00): Честно, я как-то неудачно сделал. На новом подъезде, что я добавил, стоит бетонный блок. Если хотите - удалите мои изменения.
Echo78 (2016-11-24 15:17:00+00:00): А на втором теперь забор: там не проехать, хотя дорога для автомобилей есть.
Владимир К (2016-11-24 15:20:31+00:00): Не понимаю что вы имеете ввиду. Дайте ссылку на объект для начала.
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:52:38+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454849735,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454849736
have no tags. What are they?
user_5359 (2016-11-21 11:59:06+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:07:47+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-21 11:59:31+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:07:08+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Myazyk (2017-05-02 22:58:55+00:00): 1. Як на території міста може бути ліс
2. Як територія міста може накладатись на іншу область?
user_3957715 (2017-05-03 05:39:40+00:00): 1/   Шановний пане Ви у вікіпеді мали то прочитати то всьо за даний НП То є територія закритого секретного військового містечка Макарів-1, доступ куди був відсутній дл я звичайних громадян, котрий займав  територію 2 областей . Власне  територію ві -йськового містечка зробили смт. Я займався генпланом смт цього. Посилав запит у Міноборони заради вулиць.  Щодо лісу: подивіться Малин Житомир обл де я живу - у 2000-х відбулась розширення меж і ліс аж по Букач є Малин . Щодо лісу ви задаєте "дивні запитання".  Територія НП це не тільки промзона житлова  а й може бути так звана лісопаркова зона. Територія міста як межі адмін левел і власне житлова зона то різні речі. Чи візьміть куди моя сестра виїхала https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7083185#map=15/50.1045/25.7147 - там шмат міста займає заповідник .
Myazyk (2017-05-03 16:42:50+00:00): 1. Ти навіть не можеш второпати, що на карті нанесений natural=wood на території міста.
А заповідник не може бути частиною населеного пункту
2. Хм, може, справді на території двох областей - але це вкрай дивно. Можливо, то просто вдається взнаки, що це редагував саме ти, а тому не є правильно
Myazyk (2017-05-03 16:47:07+00:00): Вікіпедія справді пише, що смт розташоване на території двох областей.
Myazyk (2017-05-03 16:48:06+00:00): Я бачу, що ти путаєш поняття межа сільради/міста та межа села/міста. І тому адмінрівні вказуєш неправильно. Але не мені тебе перенавчати.
user_3957715 (2017-05-03 17:58:46+00:00): ви читали у вікіпедіі за Городок?  Там чітко написано за 2 області  одночасово. Позвони в сільраду /   звониш в районну раду Радомишля - дають мобілку і звониш на мобілк у бо стаціонар не працює / може знайшлися в Міноборони документи.   Зараз сільрада сидить взагалі без документів про генплан . Міноборони їм нічого не передало. Щодо розрізнення селищна рада і власне смт -   підніми постанов у про створенн я Городок селищної ради. Це єдиний документ по якому можна малювати адмін левел кордону . Ти не просто не втеме по цьому НП . Я говорив с головою ради - їх створили і кинули як котят у воду.
Myazyk (2017-05-03 20:34:36+00:00): Оk
GerdP (2017-09-19 16:00:29+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=Trou du Loup
on node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4513495274
Frédéric Gutkin (2017-09-21 10:53:22+00:00): Hello,

Oops ! I set "highway" instead of "name".
Corrected !

Thanks,
Regards
user_5359 (2016-11-21 14:41:33+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:06:27+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Martin Borsje (2018-10-31 06:34:00+00:00): landuse meadow: grazen er schapen in de middenberm? is grass niet gewoon beter?
Martin Borsje (2018-10-31 06:34:57+00:00): Ook een drainagesloot langs de weg in eerder een drain dan een natural element?
Mee eens?
JJJWegdam (2018-10-31 09:37:49+00:00): Ik was er niet van op de hoogte dat er verschil is tussen de tags meadow en grass.

Met de drainagesloot ben ik het oneens. Dat water een bepaalde functie heeft wil niet zeggen dat het alleen als waterway ingevoegd kan worden. Er zijn voldoende voorbeelden van areas, waterways en combinaties daarvan. In dit geval heb ik voor een area gekozen omdat dit veel beter de structuur van de polder laat zien en bijvoorbeeld dat het water tegen de tunnelbak aan staat.
Martin Borsje (2018-10-31 10:09:10+00:00): Maar 'natural' is het zeker niet; toch? :-)
JJJWegdam (2018-10-31 10:17:06+00:00): Wat zou je zelf suggereren? Voor zover ik weet is de tag voor oppervlaktewater nou eenmaal natural=water
Martin Borsje (2018-10-31 10:43:22+00:00): probeer eens waterway=drain als area?
user_5359 (2016-11-21 14:58:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:05:43+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
eggie (2018-09-23 20:07:31+00:00): Hoi.. Ik vond een barrier=cycle_barrier op de kruising van de N351. daardoor routeerde het niet. Ik kan niet goed nagaan of jij die hebt neergelegd. Ik haal 'm weg.
ff5722 (2018-09-23 20:10:58+00:00): Die moet eigenlijk op een eilandje en de weg in twee richtingen gesplitst. Als je hem weghaalt dan pas ik de weg later wel verder aan
eggie (2018-09-23 20:26:40+00:00): Hoi.. Ik heb net nog wel de fietsroute via de fietsoversteek omgelegd.. daarom ook bicycle=dismount. Als er een bordje staat met fietsers afstappen kan het er uiteraard weer op. 
De tag cyclebarrier heb ik weggehaald.
De N351 splitsen laat ik aan jou over.   Zag even de nodige busroutes.  :)
Bedankt voor je reactie.
Groet,
eggie
eggie (2018-09-23 20:28:16+00:00): Zocht eigenlijk de "fout" in de routering door deze opmerking in een heel andere changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62848015
AkuAnakTimur (2016-11-21 13:43:42+00:00): ATM bank apa ya? Kalau tak silap, situ ada bangunan kedai saja.
user_5359 (2016-11-21 14:58:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:05:05+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-21 15:01:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/761867188 ? What is the right building? Can I merge your information to the other node??
CloCkWeRX (2017-02-07 04:35:47+00:00): Fairly sure the HJ's on Glen Osmond Road is a lot further south east
boldnesz (2017-02-07 10:16:37+00:00): I'm pretty sure of this one. I had lunch there, it's next to the gas station.

It maybe changed meanwhile or there is another HJ's at the place you're talking about
CloCkWeRX (2017-02-07 23:52:26+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2597881208 is the existing petrol station/HJ's combination. https://www.hungryjacks.com.au/stores puts only one there.
user_5359 (2016-11-21 15:02:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:04:18+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
mueschel (2016-11-24 07:20:57+00:00): Hi, could you have a look to this way? Tagging seems weird.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454866700

Cheers, Jan
wmyrda (2016-11-24 07:42:28+00:00): Yeah, Copy & paste error. Thanks for spotting that one
wmyrda (2016-11-24 07:45:25+00:00): fixed http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43912920
maraf24 (2016-11-26 14:25:00+00:00): Reverted.
sdoerr (2016-11-21 23:11:28+00:00): Oops! Copy-paste error on my part. Thanks for fixing.
user_5359 (2016-11-21 15:02:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:03:38+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
SomeoneElse (2016-11-21 16:40:59+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy
user_5359 (2016-11-21 19:20:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:02:49+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
RobJN (2016-11-21 21:13:25+00:00): I'd say that (given they are marked as exits) the slip roads are trunk_link highways. How come you feel these are still trunk highways?
robw (2016-11-21 21:17:22+00:00): Because that is the main route to/from the A45 towards Ryton & onwards.  I've been looking at the wiki about this, and the only agreement is that there is no agreement....
RobJN (2016-11-21 21:27:08+00:00): OK - although not sure where on the wiki you read that.
Will look out to see if the highways agency have signed the carriageway ref (see: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:carriageway_ref )
JJJWegdam (2021-06-14 09:04:18+00:00): Waar baseer je dit op? In het sporenplan van de RET wordt dit niet als apart niet-lzb gebied aangeduid
nammala (2016-11-22 03:50:48+00:00): Hi AlyssaS,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your comment says update roads for zoning map, but May I know the reason behind deleting the roads .

regards,
nammala
Harry Wood (2022-02-12 22:34:54+00:00): I see this here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.518244802984&lng=-0.16328142097638&z=17&pKey=123690763472939&focus=photo&x=0.4997317356275081&y=0.5788274828468936&zoom=0

I'm trying to work out why the tag for this is bicycle_parking=anchors (and what that tag is even for) . To me these look like standard bicycle_parking=stands . See this discussion: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:bicycle_parking#is_anchors_type_real.3F
SomeoneElse (2016-11-21 13:58:21+00:00): By all means add your business to OpenStreetMap (provided it's a real bricks-and-mortar office, not just a web page).
However please add it at the correct location, not in the middle of the road, and don't add spammy "description" information, or spam notes.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-02-16 23:10:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56428287 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name vandalism in Vietnam
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-15 19:29:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46116908 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-15 19:29:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46116908 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits
xmd5a (2016-12-14 19:11:42+00:00): Пожалуйста, не вносите данные, которые нужны только вам. OSM - проект для широкого круга людей, а не записная книжка. То что вы тут нарисовали - мусор с точки зрения OSM.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-06 21:23:08+00:00): Hello rlngr,
Your source tag here says "knowledge / guessing / google maps".  We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to stop doing this immediately. 
We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will go through your changes and will need to remove data that's been added from Google. This may take some time, but please do be aware that features that you have added from Google will disappear.
If you have any questions you can reply here, or you can email the Data Working Group on data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend
SomeoneElse (2017-01-06 21:23:15+00:00): Hallo rlngr,
Ihr Quelltag hier ist "Wissen / Vermutung / Google Maps". Wir sind nicht berechtigt, von Google Maps zu kopieren (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_maps_from.3F für Details), so dass Sie aufhören müssen, dies sofort zu tun.
Wir (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) werden Ihre Änderungen durchlaufen und müssen Daten entfernen, die von Google hinzugefügt wurden. Dies kann einige Zeit dauern, aber bitte beachten Sie, dass Funktionen, die Sie von Google hinzugefügt haben, verschwinden.
Wenn Sie irgendwelche Fragen haben, können Sie hier antworten, oder Sie können die Daten-Arbeitsgruppe auf data@osmfoundation.org emailen.
Freundliche Grüße,
Andy Townsend
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-15 19:29:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46116908 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:58:36+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
freebeer (2018-11-28 18:22:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64982527 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me castle
Harald Hartmann (2016-11-21 18:15:01+00:00): Hallo Automat7, wie du im Forum wohl schon entnommen hast, geht es mit anderen Editoren (z.B. JOSM) sehr wohl und einfach ;)
shrddr (2016-11-22 13:23:27+00:00): что случилось с промышленной зоной https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286401281 ?
Bill Sheppard (2016-11-21 16:40:19+00:00): Ah. Most likely correct. I cannot follow the nodes concept to see how I misnamed towns.
dan980 (2016-12-10 09:42:18+00:00): ciao, sei sicuro che sia un monumento? Dal nome sembrerebbe invece un nuraghe
Giovanni Monni (2016-12-10 17:42:30+00:00): Ciao,  Hai ragione tutti i Nuraghi che ho inserito, e  inseriro' li ho contrassegnati col simbolo di monumento fammi una cortesia dammi una dritta, che simbolo usare per evidenziare i Nuraghi cosi da poter effettuare una correzione. Ho verificato le mappe gps piu evolute e il simbolo dei nuraghi lo da come monumento, vedi la  mappa Garmin, o avranno sbagliato anche loro non avendo il simbolo adeguato al riconoscimento dei Nuraghi ,nelle mie vecchie mappe IGM  della Sardegna i nuraghi si riconoscono col simbolo di sei puntini a cerchio, potrebbe essere un' idea grazie, ciao
dan980 (2016-12-10 18:49:19+00:00): Per ciascun nuraghe stiamo inserendo le seguenti etichette:
historic=archaeological_site
site_type=megalith
megalith_type=nuraghe
historic:civilization=nuragic
historic:period=nuragic

Qui trovi una mappa che individua tutti i nuraghi etichettati con questo schema: http://nuraghe.org/map.html
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:58:13+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Nakaner (2017-02-24 08:03:15+00:00): Hallo Chensi,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz Referenznummern an Gewässern ergänzt bzw. geändert (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432075203/history). Ich bezweifle sehr, dass man diese auf dem Bing-Luftbild erkennen kann. Könntest du mir bitte daher die Quelle nennen, von wo du diese übernommen hast? 

Viele Grüße

Michael
Chenshi (2017-02-24 10:43:58+00:00): source: eigene von der Gemeinde vergebene Nummern für das Grabenkataster der Gemeinde Wagenfeld.