piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rbradt (2020-08-11 16:54:50+00:00): In this area, there are numerous roads providing access. The unsanctioned trails are illegally constructed, frequently plunge directly down the fall line, and have no drainage structures. The result is significant erosion and general resource damage.
Glassman (2020-07-31 18:03:25+00:00): Tip: If the church occupies the entire building, add the tags to the building instead of a node. Either way is acceptable, but adding the information to the building says that the church occupies the entire building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88759014
user_5359 (2020-07-31 04:32:37+00:00): Hello! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
user_5359 (2020-07-31 04:33:29+00:00): Correction of the last sentence: Can you add the value for the street name, please?
user_5359 (2020-07-31 04:31:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
b-jazz (2020-07-31 23:50:23+00:00): Hi Dillon, a separate issue from what user_5359 mentioned is that you tried to define a residential area, but you only drew a single line instead of a polygon. I would fix it, but I'm not sure where you wanted to indicate the residential area is.
marczoutendijk (2020-08-01 09:14:52+00:00): Hello mackboat,
You seem to place one house on top of another in this edit of yours.
Could you correct that?

Best regards,
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2020-08-01 09:14:42+00:00): Hello mackboat,
You seem to place one house on top of another in this edit of yours.
Could you correct that?

Best regards,
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
flohoff (2020-07-31 08:16:28+00:00): Moin,

ich habe eben den Kreisverkehr mal noch auf secondary hochgesetzt. EIn Kreisverkehr trägt ja immer die höchste Straßenklasse der einmündenden Straßen. 

Was mir noch aufgefallen sind sind die no_u_turn restrictions. Meiner meinung nach sind die über. Da der Kreisverkehr eine "Einbahnstraße" ist darf ich da eh nicht gegen die Straße abbiegen, damit auch nicht u-turnen.

Hab ich auch zum ersten mal gesehen die restrictions.

Flo
Bluefake (2020-07-31 12:50:02+00:00): Danke Flo!
Ist schon ein Weilchen her, dass ich was ernsthaftes auf OSM editiert habe. Danke für deine Hilfe.
flohoff (2020-07-31 13:45:34+00:00): Kein ding ;) Mir ist es nur per Zufall aufgefallen. Hab ja mit Geseke nix am Hut. Aber ich habe eine Routenüberwachung am laufen und die routen DURCH Geseke sind alle 10 Sekunden langsamer und 30m weiter geworden ;) Kreisverkehr halt. Und dann hab ich mir das angesehen.

Aber schön das du dabei bleibst ;) 

Flo
SYMON666 (2020-08-09 01:48:39+00:00): IVR INTERFACE GENESYS 3RD PARTY REGISTRATION 
RELEASE NUMBER   8.0.000.26  [04/16/13]
8.0.000.20-SDK(ER#292062626)
8.0.000.17
8.0.000.16  
8.0.000.15
ER#287634912
CORRECTIONS ER#283178308
ER#281920055
ER#271165871 
ER#269737518
ER#261822651
[123456789101112]<123456789101112131415161718192021222324>1-12=24hr=~{1>7<2>8<9>3<10>4<11>5<12>6};(13-7/14-8/15-9/16-10/17-11/18-12)
19,1,20,2,21,3,22,4,23,5,24,6,7,1 8 2,9,3,4,10,11,5,12,6,13,7,14,8,15,9,16,10,17,11,18,22,19,13,20,14,21,15,22,16,23,17,24,18,1,19,2,20,3,21={<7>}
[7,21,66,,198,594,1,782,5,346,16,038,48,114,144,342,433,026,1,299,078,3,897,234]÷7,777,777=《0.5010729929644》
ER#281920055
praghath (2020-08-10 07:44:46+00:00): Hi, 

Could you please provide more information and clarity regarding the comment.

Regards,
praghath
praghath (2020-08-10 08:04:12+00:00): Hi,
I've corrected the node connectivity at(*https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7771978857#map=19/34.04121/-117.97788 *) under the changeset(#89184732).
Regards,
praghath
skquinn (2020-07-31 07:21:05+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I don't think the oneway tags you added are correct. I think the stop sign on the east flare is for traffic turning left and both of these flares are likely two-way traffic (as strange as that may seem). Have you surveyed this?
mariotomo (2020-08-06 20:47:23+00:00): Hola.  has creado un nodo "Hospital" en este conjunto de cambios.  estás muy seguro de que hay un hospital en la zona?  me suena raro, pero no sé.
mariotomo (2020-10-26 22:05:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=grave_yard
(o sea, voy a quitarlo)
UNGSC-Jrachi (2022-04-27 15:50:56+00:00): Roja non è un nome!
canfe (2022-04-28 13:26:31+00:00): Ho corretto
josmougn (2020-08-05 16:48:22+00:00): salut Simon
sur ce chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46424060 et les autres corrections récentes dans le coin ça me parait un peu abusé de rajouter bicycle=yes pour faire plaisir à un signaleur et au routeur géovélo. Par défaut un path est autorisé aux vélos, il ne me semble donc pas la peine d'ajouter bicycle=yes. Par contre ce serait cool de corriger les fixme :-)
De plus, et je parle là du cas général, ça me parait être donner beaucoup de poids à un signalement via géovélo dont la qualité est difficile à estimer par rapport au "travail" des contributeurs réguliers dans osm qui le plus souvent observent finement le terrain en ayant déjà en tête la façon de le traduire dans osm.  A +, José
abakus_uploader (2020-07-31 22:32:17+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
TravGW (2020-08-03 04:32:19+00:00): If a road leads to a house then it does qualify as a driveway. So you were correct the first time.
devapujk (2020-08-06 05:46:25+00:00): Hi,

Apologies for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing the edit. I've made the changes under changeset(88981337). Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
devapujk
topius (2020-07-31 12:11:32+00:00): Why? It is clearly a residential road. If, then this should be connected to the main highway, and the surface tag should be changed to dirt.
tony_hny (2020-07-31 22:54:14+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. I changed the road to residential.
dopingrolf (2020-09-09 20:33:07+00:00): das stimmt leider nicht was hier geändert wurde.
der trail ist schon eingezeichnet. wenn man leider keine schilder lesen kann dann sollte man nochmal etwas nachhilfe nehmen. ;-)

grüße
SLMapper (2020-09-09 21:28:33+00:00): @dopingrolf: bin zufällig auf den changeset gestoßen. Würdest du dich über so einen Kommentar freuen? Versuche doch bitte sachlich zu bleiben.
user_2066394 (2020-07-31 08:59:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Kovoschiz (2020-07-31 10:10:34+00:00): They aren't mutually exclusive. You should simply add `man_made=chimney`, without removing the other Seamark tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88769603
PlaneMad (2020-09-23 16:23:44+00:00): Hi Kannan, nice work mapping the area.

Authivilai was added as a railway line that i have corrected as a neighborhood, please check.
andergrin (2020-07-31 10:27:32+00:00): Проїзд через будинок позначається tunnel=building_passage без layer
topius (2020-07-31 12:00:51+00:00): This road has a clear connecting function, therefore should not be classified as track. Track, according to OSM guidelines, should be used only for agricultural / forestry use. And since this is Papua New Guinea, where planes are often much more important than roads, you will encounter a lot of "floating" roads, as they lead away from airstrips (which hasn't been marked here yet), to other villages. One could argue that this could be classified as a path (as there most likely is no vehicle around to use this road), no?
tony_hny (2020-07-31 22:54:00+00:00): Hi topius. I agree, it seems to be connecting these two settlements, so I changed it to unclassified.
topius (2020-07-31 11:52:58+00:00): Again, why track? Track should be for agricultural / forestry purposes according to the OSM guidelines. This is a connecting road from the shore up to Salamaua Secondary School. If not unclassified, then what else?
tony_hny (2020-07-31 22:52:46+00:00): Hi topius. I changed it to unclassified again: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88797626#map=17/-7.05013/147.03351
bxl-forever (2020-08-01 09:30:16+00:00): Hello,
Adding gardens is nice and useful.
Just one piece of advice: do not forget to add "access=private" and "garden:type=residential".
Otherwise, plenty of apps will treat them just like public gardens and will mislead people looking for a green area to have some rest. :-(
VéloJesse (2020-08-03 08:21:08+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. I hadn't seen those tags. I've updated it now.
aceman444 (2020-08-04 19:22:15+00:00): Uf, vidim, ze ste tych highway=footway popridavali po Tatrach uz dost. Skuste ich prehodnotit, ci to nema byt highway=path, ako som pisal.
Pozrite si definicie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dpath a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dfootway .
user_5359 (2020-07-31 16:36:13+00:00): Please write understandable change set comments. Should "EpW25kWRSja4" be a reference to the source of the restaurants: Is the license of this source compatible with OSM?
Supaplex (2020-08-17 05:32:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7772769996
位置怪怪的，跑到路上了
topius (2020-07-31 10:51:31+00:00): Why track? Track, according to OSM guidelines should be used for roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc. This road here goes straight through a village. If at all marked as road and not path (as it does not have any connectivity to anywhere else), then it should probably be mapped as residential, no?
tony_hny (2020-07-31 22:52:02+00:00): Thanks for commenting. I have changed the road to residential.
Diógenes de Sinope (2020-08-01 17:28:48+00:00): 🛑 it is against OpenStreetMap guidelines to add personally identifying information to the map - [ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information ] | é contra as directrizes do OpenStreetMap acrescentar informações de identificação pessoal ao mapa - [ https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=en&tl=pt&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.openstreetmap.org%2Fwiki%2FLimitations_on_mapping_private_information ]
topius (2020-07-31 10:41:27+00:00): Why remove it completely and not just change it to path? There clearly is a path visible on the satellite pictures leading from the Sepik River (where people get off the boat) to the village with airstrip.
movie_fan_sal (2020-07-31 22:56:40+00:00): Hi topius, thanks for commenting. I have restored the road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88796816
eggie (2020-07-31 10:19:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Zo'n watervlak kan inderdaad op twee manieren.
Het was hier overigens goed gemapt. 
De naam Amstel hoort niet op het watervlak te staan, maar staat op de waterway=river

Dat laatste is dus niet correct.

MVG,
eggie

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-31 10:30:47+00:00): name=Amstel heb ik verwijderd.. Het hoort op de waterway=river.. en daar staat het ook.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-07-31 10:34:08+00:00): Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=riverbank
xgerrmann (2020-07-31 10:41:40+00:00): Hi Eggie, super bedankt voor je feedback!
Kovoschiz (2020-07-31 09:58:38+00:00): A PO Box is obviously not the same as a post box. `addr:pobox=` and `contact:pobox=` are in use. Not every post office has a PO box.
Kovoschiz (2020-07-31 10:01:26+00:00): Both `pobox` and `po_box` (suggested in `amenity=po_box`) exists.
mueschel (2020-07-31 10:44:34+00:00): I can only repeat what I wrote many times: Don't invent new keys without documenting them. This will always lead to confusion with other mappers and data that nobody understands.

There is a proposal for "amenity=po_box", but this by no means implies that tags like pobox=* or po_box=* can exist as well.

So, if there is a PO box, you either have to use the proposed tag  "amenity=po_box" or write a new proposal for a new key.
Kovoschiz (2020-07-31 14:16:48+00:00): But I didn't invent `po_box=`. At least someone else has used it before, even `po_boxes=`. Why don't you ask for their opinions as well? I'm only following them.
mueschel (2020-07-31 15:20:23+00:00): You invented "pobox". Nobody used that before. 'po_box' might be used twice, but that's not what you tagged here. And one of them is a mistake and should be 'contact:pobox'.

If you want to use a tag that is already in use, please use 'po_boxes', this exists 4 times on post offices up to now.
Kovoschiz (2020-08-01 03:50:33+00:00): "If you want to use a tag that is already in use, please use 'po_boxes'" which runs contrary to both `amenity=po_box` and `*:pobox=`, both documented, more or less. If I use  'po_boxes=', that would be totally undocumented, and violating a common rule of singular form on such features. Would you not agree with the almost de facto format of sub-tagging for example any `amenity=*` by `*=` then? I would love to see you share with us how many such sub-keys are undocumented. 
The variety is obviously from the unclear styling. Do I follow `pobox`, from addresses; or `po_box`, from PO boxes -- that was the question in my mind.
mueschel (2020-08-01 09:30:03+00:00): There is exactly one commonly accepted way to solve tagging questions and introduce tags: Write a proposal.
Kovoschiz (2020-08-01 12:47:13+00:00): Then you wouldn't have to tell me to use the undocumented and plural `po_boxes=`. Both `pobox=` and `po_box=` would be natural sub-tags of existing schemes. I'm merely following their lead. So thank you, I definitely look forward to writing a follow-up when one of them gets approved.
marcoSt (2020-08-22 17:17:21+00:00): Servus Lukas,

Eine Frage: Ist die S3 nördlich von Hollabrunn schon vorzeitig fertiggestellt und freigegeben, oder nicht? 

Ich bin gerade über dein tagging dort etwas auf den Leim gegangen. Laut Unterlagen soll der Abschnitt erst im November fertig sein. 

Dein tagging hat mich dazu verleitet, dass ich die E-Route und die Flixbus-Route umgeswitcht und das construction=trunk gelöscht habe, aufgrund einer Fehlermeldung der Seite  https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/EU/EU-Flixbus-Analysis.html. 

Dadurch bekomme ich Anfragen von anderen Usern, ob das ganze stimmt oder nicht. Selbst eine Fehlernote beschäftigt sich mit diesem Thema, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2308205#map=15/48.5932/16.0742&layers=N.

Deshalb meine Frage: Ist dieser Abschnitt vorzeitig fertig geworden und freigegeben oder nicht? Wenn nicht, muss dieser ganze Abschnitt wieder auf construction umgetaggt werden. Ansonsten wäre das generell zu begrüßen.

LG Marco
ottorol (2020-08-18 13:05:09+00:00): можете дать пояснения к следующим точкам: 7772458510, 7772458511, 7772458522(киоск стационарный?), кафе стационарное(7772458516), таулет стационарный 7772458582?
ottorol (2020-08-18 13:06:04+00:00): туалет 6679496204 видимо был уничтожен. в 2018 году там точно стояла деревянная постройка
ottorol (2020-08-18 13:09:12+00:00): обратите внимание на Айский фонтан. Там уже три точечных объекта натолкали.
ottorol (2020-08-18 13:16:54+00:00): изучите вики и исправьте места обозначенные тегом camp_site. причина: значительная часть обозначенных мест не являются официальными, а выделение и разметка мест происходит ушлым народом, у которых нет прав на землю.
Andrei_2018_EKB (2020-08-18 16:42:48+00:00): Здравствуйте!
7772458510, 7772458511 - оборудованные места для стоянок: кострище, площадки под палатки, сход к воде ступеньками. Если можно это каким-то более подходящим тегом обозначить, посоветуйте, поменяю! Перед постановкой тега изучал, что там может быть ещё, лучшего не нашёл. camp_site, как я понимаю, может быть и без прав на землю (особенно в нац парках и т.д), просто местом, где обычно ставят палатки без всяких удобств. Поэтому поставил ещё backcountry. Если ошибаюсь, поправьте! Внесу изменения :) (вот, добавил ещё теперь impromptu)
7772458522 - киоск, магазин, идёт торговля с него, вполне стационарный. Плакат с реки.
7772458516 - кафе стационарное, рядом столики, торгуют, готовят кофе. Похоже, что возведено недавно, совсем с иголочки. Могу переслать фото, если интересно :)
7772458582 - деревянный туалет на две кабинки, выгребная яма.
6679496204 - специально обошёл всю местность, так как увидел точку с туалетом :) Там ничего не осталось из построек, только овраг, в который все и ходят.
Robot8A (2020-07-31 12:12:56+00:00): Arreglado
jemily1 (2020-08-01 12:01:25+00:00): la verdad es que di cuenta del error mirando como están mapeadas las diferentes capitales de provincia españolas, pero también pequeñas poblaciones, y al pinchar en el nombre de ese pueblo y buscar luego información en wikipedia decidí avisar mediante etiqueta fix:me, también una nota y una petición de review, para que se corriege en el menor tiempo posible  http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Reflexiones-sobre-accesibilidad-td5943440.html  hace tiempo que intento responderte en este mensaje para preguntarte algunas cosas sobre bordillos y pasos peatonales, pero me sale que no tengo autorización para responder
Robot8A (2020-08-01 12:59:24+00:00): Creo que las respuestas se hacen mediante la lista de correos https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es

Saludos
jemily1 (2020-08-01 14:04:50+00:00): pues como a día de hoy sigo sin tener autorización para responder te lo pregunto por aquí;  es en este changeset mío  #88530677, vas a donde pone vías y pinchas  en el nodo 828855802, v2; el bordillo en esta avenida separa las vías del tranvía (asfaltadas y compartidas con autobuses urbanos) de la acera - en la parte de la acera el bordillo es como un escalón, mientras que en la parte de la calzada está inclinado, para dificultar y evitar que los peatones crucen por esa parte; a propuesta de jordi_mf puse raised, pero me gustaría saber que pondrías tú, ya que no he encontrado en la wiki ningún ejemplo parecido
Robot8A (2020-08-01 14:53:26+00:00): Entiendo que un bordillo en ángulo (también llamado montable) sería kerb=rolled (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb), pero siendo que el bordillo tiene dos 'caras', no sabría qué hacer. Te animo a escribir un tema en la lista para que pueda opinar todo el mundo, que en cuanto te apuntas en el enlace que te he pasado antes puedes ya escribir. Para empezar un nuevo tema, simplemente manda un mensaje de correo a talk-es@openstreetmap.org y le llegará a todo el mundo como un nuevo hilo.
Saludos
Frans S (2020-07-31 10:34:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please pay more attention on accurate mapping and squaring the buildings
See my PM
Nest regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-07-31 10:27:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please pay more attention on accurate and rectangular mapping.
I send a PM with advise how to improve your mapping skills.
Best regards and keep mapping
eserte (2020-08-02 17:40:34+00:00): Wurde hier die Einbahnstraßenregelung tatsächlich entfernt? Ich habe nichts davon in der Presse erfahren...
adrianb_telenav (2020-08-03 06:15:03+00:00): Hi,  eserte.  It appears that I was mislead by the street level imagery. I added back the oneway key for the bridge. Thank you for letting me know.
eserte (2020-08-03 18:55:51+00:00): Thanks for reverting.
aweech (2020-07-31 16:53:20+00:00): Hi,
I see that you deleted a bunch of houses and addresses in this edit. Do you have evidence that they have been permanently demolished?
Frans S (2020-08-07 12:47:10+00:00): Hello Leanne. Thank you so much for mapping here
Unfortunately, your mappings are not that accurate and squared as HOT expect .
I copy on a PM  some advises wich might help to improve your mapping skills
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-07-31 10:48:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I reviewed your work.
Please improve your mapping skills
Non of the buildings you mapped are as accurate and squared as HOTOSM expect .
See the PM I've send to you
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-07-31 10:49:10+00:00): I invalidate this task.
Please be so kind to improve your mappings
Best regards
Frans S (2020-08-08 10:02:27+00:00): Hello Alex,
Thans for mapping here.
Please improve your mapping skills.
I copied some advises in a PM to you.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-07-31 11:06:05+00:00): hello. JosephR
I reviewed some work of you and from the 45 mappings I' ve seen none of them is accurate mapped and squared.
See my PM
Frans S (2020-07-31 15:37:19+00:00): Hello.
Also these mappings are below Par.
Please correct these mappings
Best regards
Frans S (2020-07-31 11:00:36+00:00): Please reopen this task and improve your mappings. none of your mappings are as precise and squared as HOTOSM might expect.
Best regards
Frans S (2020-07-31 15:28:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Please improve your mapping skills
None of the buildings you mapped are accurate and squared.
A bit sloppy mapped.
I copy you in a PM advises how to improve your mappings
Best regards
Frans S (2020-07-31 15:14:28+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping on this project.
You marked this task as 'Bad imagery"  By accident?
about your mappings, 
They are not accurate and square
You mapped 41 buildings, none of them accurate and square.
Please open this task again and improve your mapping
Task 834
I copy you some advises to improve your mapping skills.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-08-04 14:07:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Please square the buildings you map with the Q key 
Best regards
Frans S (2020-08-04 12:17:48+00:00): Hello Adam
I am reviewing your work and I have to say that your mapping skills needs to be improved. Your mappings are a bit sloppy  and not squared.
Please open this task (160) again and improve the mappings
Best regards
I copy you some advises as well on a PM to you
Truchin (2020-08-09 12:48:10+00:00): Bonjour
La dune du pilat est bien une dune donc "natural"="dune". J'ai rectifié.
Pour modifier le rendu qui n'est pas adapté, il faut faire un ticket...

Bonne continuation

Thomas
Frans S (2020-07-31 15:35:40+00:00): Hello.  See my comment on previous changeset. Also here sloppy mappings.
Please correct these mappings as well
Best regards
Mia Fourt (2020-08-01 10:16:26+00:00): Hi Fran, thank you for the comment. I'm concerned that looking at these mappings a lot of them seemed to have shifted, that the shapes are right but they've moved from where I mapped them and I'm not sure why. I will edit them but I'm not sure why this is happening
eggie (2020-07-31 12:03:41+00:00): Dag swesseli
foot=yes in designated veranderen lijkt me niet correct.
foot=yes lijkt me beter. 
access=no wordt sporadisch gebruikt.
Beter alleen de categorieën erop zetten die er niet door mogen. 
MVG,
eggie
Frans S (2020-08-08 10:29:25+00:00): Hello Jeverard, Thank you for mapping on this difficult task. 
A few remarks. 
Quite a lot of your mappings are not accurate and squared. Please correct your mappings and map also the missing buildings
Task 625 
I invalidate it.
I copy you some advises how to improve your mapping quality
Best regards and keep mapping
PT-53 (2020-08-01 05:14:48+00:00): Hallo Rabenkind22,
Deine Eingabe
lane_markings=no
an diesem Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178990742/history
war falsch. Ich habe dies wieder gelöscht.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2020-08-10 12:07:36+00:00): What is the source of maxspeed=30 on Nørregade. Did you see a sign?
Are you sure it was not maxspeed:advisory (blue square sign)?

I was there last week and did not se a maxspeed=30 sign.

The south end is living street, I made a Mapillery image there and can see so 30 sign.