piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ZLima12 (2022-10-16 18:51:19+00:00): Also, to add to that list, you should never create a "no U-turn" restriction unless there is a sign that says so.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
Vinber-Pro (2022-10-08 05:58:35+00:00): ce manhattan (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10067645412) est un doublon de celui ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6779376344

le souci étant qu'il semble y avoir les 2 entrées ...

à bientôt
blxght (2022-10-01 23:14:04+00:00): Hej, fajnie robisz te landuse wszędzie, tylko nie powinno się "przyklejać" rzeczy do granic administracyjnych, bo wtedy osoby które to edytują w przyszłości będą miały trudniej i będą mogły przypadkiem przesunąć granice
Możesz przytrzymać "Alt" stawiając punkt nad granicą, by się nie przykleiło ale było w tym samym miejscu
Cy0nyx_PL (2022-10-02 11:10:31+00:00): Hej. Dzięki za wrócenie uwagi. Dla mnie jako geodety naturalne jest aby, jak to nazywacie tutaj, landuse opierać na granicach, ale faktycznie dla innych w przyszłości może to być problematyczne, także biorę się już do poprawy tego
blxght (2022-10-02 12:47:26+00:00): O, super. Można na granicach ale tylko wtedy jeśli coś wpływa na kształt granicy i wraz z zmianą obiektu granica by też się zmieniła, np w niektórych przypadkach rzeki
Filip009 (2022-10-03 19:40:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099746937
highway=cycleway sa značia cyklochodníky v meste, väčsinou s asfaltovým povrchom, označené dopravnou značkou. Pre lesné cyklotraily sa používa highway=path a bicycle=designated. Ako napríklad tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/564811508
robokom (2022-10-03 19:48:15+00:00): OK, jasné, vďaka
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:19:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10067681727/history has app_operated = yes that was added in this edit
What app_operated=yes means here? Have you wanted to mark that you can control it with app in some way but app may be necessary or not? For example shop where you can scan and pay with app, without going through a traditional line. Or is it for objects where you need an app to use them at all? Then maybe app_operated=only would be better?

Note, this key seems undocumented on wiki, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:app_operated and
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 17:23:04+00:00): welp, this page actually exists now, I forgot to check it and I forgot that I tried to document it (feel free to check its correctness!)

sorry for last sentence being wrong
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-03 20:22:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126957361 where the changeset comment is: Reverting the edits by the current account of PixelDubs. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6414 .  Some edits may be plausible; most are not, and mean that we can't trust the plausible ones.
Frans S (2022-10-03 12:48:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. Did you read the instructions?
"Roads: Map significant routes only. As a general rule, don't trace roads that don't lead to any building, village or town. It is easy to mistake small rivers and borders of agricultural areas for roads. Refer to the Highway Tag Africa wiki-page for more information on tagging roads in the region."
Please focus on mapping those highways and tag them accordingly. Please do not add a fixme  Continuous because it is obvious that a mapper on the neighbouring task continues with these roads.

Best regards.
Frans S 
Changeset reviewed by a global validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126876017
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-02 06:29:08+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Szymson (2023-02-11 13:13:16+00:00): "Budynek nie istnieje" to na pewno nie jest prawidłowa nazwa dla tego obszaru...
Szymson (2023-02-11 13:14:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132404087
DressyPear4 (2022-10-02 13:03:52+00:00): Olá, para ciclovias use highway=cycleway. Adicionando como secondary, você informa que até caminhão pode passar por ela.
Se for ciclofaixa, não sobreponha linhas, adicione cycleway:left=lane/track ou cycleway:right=lane/track nas vias existentes.
Veja mais em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126877188
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-02 06:29:26+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
dpolovinkin (2025-04-01 05:26:40+00:00): fyi nothing changed, he still uses "no comment" for all his comments :\
ezekielf (2022-10-11 02:15:37+00:00): Hi there, thanks for working on trails in Vermont!  This unclassified road looks a little out of place though.  Was it a mistake?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099761510
ezekielf (2022-10-16 05:38:05+00:00): I went ahead and changed this segment and another one nearby to highway=track as that is the more accurate primary tag anyway. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127599298

Looks like these might be old abandoned logging roads.  I can see them on VCGI LiDAR, but I don't have on the ground knowledge of the state they are in.
trail_runner86 (2022-10-16 11:47:21+00:00): Great, Thanks for your feedback and change it to the correct tag.
Frans S (2022-10-03 10:34:40+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126877845
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:19:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10067859590/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
tobji (2025-12-18 22:37:16+00:00): The bus stop had no information, which has since been filled in by imports. It is resolved now.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
JessAk71 (2022-10-02 20:44:59+00:00): Hi pabi12,
It looks like your edit to this building actually removed the building=yes tag from the building, but the feature is also a building so the building=yes tag should stay as is. I have fixed this case for you here but please be more careful in future edits to not remove existing tags to features if they are still relevant for the feature.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
JessAk71 (2022-10-02 20:54:53+00:00): Hi pabi12,
This is another case where it looks like your edit to this building actually removed the building=yes tag from the building, but the feature is also a building so the building=yes tag should stay as is. I have fixed this case for you here but please be more careful in future edits to not remove existing tags to features if they are still relevant for the feature.
Supaplex (2022-10-04 15:11:57+00:00): 為什麼移除機場呢?廢止的話請用相關life cycle標籤如disused:前綴
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
goldfndr (2024-09-27 13:33:08+00:00): For the bus stops, which attributes needed to be fixed?
tobji (2024-09-27 21:47:46+00:00): @goldfndr They didn't have any names or IDs, which have been recently filled out by someone else in an automated edit, and "fixme" should be removed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10067907713/history
Supaplex (2022-10-04 15:12:57+00:00): 為什麼移除機場呢?廢止的話請用相關life cycle標籤如disused:前綴
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126878695
Alex W2 (2022-10-02 05:47:23+00:00): I realized I mistakenly deleted these items. I need help reverting this change.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-02 10:20:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126887039 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 2 changesets at user request (on IRC and at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126879230)
Stranger_I (2022-10-02 08:14:06+00:00): Приветствую. В своей правке по Челябинску ты наделал ошибок. Ты удалил highway=crossing с пересечения дорог и пешеходных тротуаров и поставил highway=traffic_signals. Это неверно. тем самым ты сломал роутинг для пешеходов. Если переход для пешехода существует и регулируемый, там должен crossing=traffic_signals. В то же место можно воткнуть highway=traffic_signals, если хочется обозначить фактическое место стояния светофора. Но чаще всё же светофор ставится на место пересечения автомобильных дорог. Не дороги с пешеходником! Для инфы https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=traffic_signals
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Alex W2 (2022-10-02 05:47:26+00:00): I realized I mistakenly deleted these items. I need help reverting this change.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-02 10:20:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126887039 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 2 changesets at user request (on IRC and at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126879230)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
ChehrehBargi (2022-10-16 07:56:00+00:00): سلام
ضمن خسته نباشید
در ویرایشهایتان سعی کنید تاریخچه را پاک نکنید. مثلا در همین بسته تغییر، جاده قبلی را کاملا پاک کرده‌اید و به دو بانده تبدیل کرده‌اید. با ویرایش جاده قبلی، تاریخچه هم حفظ میشود.
باسپاس
ChehrehBargi (2022-10-16 07:59:56+00:00): در ضمن شما دوربین ثبت سرعت را پاک کرده‌اید. دلیل این کارتان چیست؟
ChehrehBargi (2023-04-11 20:04:09+00:00): به تازگی این مسیر را مجددا بررسی کردم، دوربین سرعت برداشته شده ولی مسیر در محدوده روستای کرگان همچنان دوطرفه دو لاینه است. اصلاح می کنم و خواهش دارم که به نکاتی که بیان شد توجه داشته باشید.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
zorglubu (2022-10-02 14:51:15+00:00): Bonjour,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10067994582
ce nœud est à la fois traffic_calming et traffic_sign. Si les deux existent, il faudrait sans doute les séparer. Merci.
Régis Vrignaud (2022-10-03 06:01:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui , les deux signes sont très différents, à l'inverse des passages piétons qui sont souvent couplés avec un ralentisseur. Je vais donc séparer les deux . Merci pour la remarque. Cordialement .
Régis
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Davileci (2023-04-10 00:06:02+00:00): Key:parking:orientation is deprecated.
Seraq (2023-04-10 07:00:30+00:00): Thank you very much Davileci, I've already corrected it. 


Seraq
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.