piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Arlo James Barnes (2021-08-18 12:55:33+00:00): Apologies. How should this be fixed?
user_2066394 (2021-03-21 12:36:47+00:00): Da ist jetzt versehentlich highway=residential verlorengegangen.
Mau Muñoz (2021-03-20 22:54:54+00:00): La descripción correcta es: mejora y adición de senderos del parque.
Night_Raven (2021-03-21 14:18:05+00:00): Ścieżki może i są, ale prowadzą do niebezpiecznego, dzikiego przejścia nad strugą z którego można łatwo spaść do wody. Ścieżki wydeptali wędkarze i okoliczni panowie pijący tanie wino w  krzakach. Pozostawienie tych ścieżek na mapie stwarza zagrożenie, że ludzie będą tamtędy chodzić skracając sobie drogę np miedzy Winiarami i Piekarami przy użyciu jakiejś aplikacji nawigacyjnej. TO NIE JEST CIĄG KOMUNIKACYJNY a ścieżki powinny zostać usunięte z mapy.
RicoElectrico (2021-03-21 14:22:22+00:00): Nie masz w zwyczaju opisywać swoich zmian, więc trudno, aby ktoś odgadł twoje intencje.
maraf24 (2021-03-21 18:51:13+00:00): @Night_Raven: Moim zdaniem to nie wystarczy. Zagrożenie wciąż istnieje, bo mało osób korzysta z OSM. Niektórzy sobie tak po prostu chodzą bez nawigacji i mogą, widząc ścieżkę, pójść nią, upaść, połamać się lub jeszcze gorzej.
Nie możesz więc ograniczyć się tylko do usunięcia ich z OSM, ale także usunąć je fizycznie - rozkopać, zakopać lub chociaż postawić tam tablice zakazujące chodzenia.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-22 14:35:57+00:00): Jeśli istnieją to ich usuwanie jest błędne.

Dodaj surface=dirt lit=no wheelchair=no itd jeśli są kiepskie

Dodaj access=no jeśli użycie jest nielegalnie

Tak długo jak istnieją - ich kasowanie z OSM nie jest OK i powinny zostać przywrócone
amatissart (2021-04-05 10:36:00+00:00): Hi,
Could you explain why the beach area has been added the administrative boundary relations? It seems to be redundant with the exiisting "outer" ways, and elements without any role are not valid in the relation according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Relation:boundary#Relation_members
Best regards.
eggie (2021-03-21 06:25:57+00:00): Dag Brommertje..
Je hebt nu de accesstags aangepast, maar kijk even hier voor de juiste tagging in de Nederlandse situatie.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway

Verplicht fietspad (verkeersbord G11). Nederlands verkeersbord G11.svg
Gebruik hiervoor highway=cycleway met traffic sign=NL:G11 ; mofa=yes ; moped=no. De tags voor mofa en moped zijn hier dus niet strikt noodzakelijk, daar G11 dat bepaalt.

Verplicht bromfiets/fietspad (verkeersbord G12a) Nederlands verkeersbord G12a.svg
Gebruik hiervoor highway=cycleway met traffic sign=NL:G12a ; mofa=designated ; moped=designated.

Onverplicht fietspad (verkeersbord G13) Nederlands verkeersbord G13.svg
Gebruik highway=cycleway met traffic sign=NL:G13; moped=no ; mofa=no. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-21 06:27:20+00:00): dus moped=designated ipv yes op G12a
Marc_ch (2022-07-11 07:45:05+00:00): Bonjour,
Quelle source vous fait penser que "la sotière" est le nom de ce chemin et non pas un lieu dit comme renseigné précédemment ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73885961
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/576101632
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/797150301
Salutations,
Marc
eric6quatre (2022-07-11 08:02:20+00:00): Bonjour, ça fait plus d'une année là ;-)
Mais la source est SwissTopo (source elle-même alimentée par les cantons). Vous pouvez voir ceci via ce permalein: https://map.geo.admin.ch/?lang=fr&topic=ech&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&layers=ch.swisstopo.zeitreihen,ch.swisstopo.swisstlm3d-karte-farbe,ch.swisstopo-vd.ortschaftenverzeichnis_plz,ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register,ch.bav.haltestellen-oev,ch.swisstopo.swisstlm3d-wanderwege,ch.swisstopo.swissnames3d,ch.swisstopo.amtliches-strassenverzeichnis,ch.swisstopo.amtliches-gebaeudeadressverzeichnis&layers_visibility=false,false,false,true,false,false,false,true,true&layers_timestamp=18641231,,,,,,,,&layers_opacity=1,1,0.75,1,1,0.8,1,0.85,1&catalogNodes=457,491&E=2566561.25&N=1190395.63&zoom=11
Meilleures salutations
Eric
Marc_ch (2022-07-11 21:26:39+00:00): Merci pour votre retour.
Ha oui en effet, sur le site du canton elle est maintenant nommée, ce n'était pas le cas à l'époque (cfr le lieu dit a quelques mètres au Nord-Est qu'ils ont étrangement maintenu après le nommage du chemin bétonné)
eggie (2021-03-21 07:20:33+00:00): Beste Brommertje ,

bicycle en foot=designated verwijderen (default)
Nog aanpassen.. 
moped=designated
mofa=designated

Juiste tagging
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-21 07:34:02+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast
gr eggie
habi (2021-03-22 13:54:33+00:00): In this changeset you've added several 'demolised:building's.
I took the liberty to change this typo to 'demolished:building'.

Happy mapping,
habi
habi (2021-03-22 13:54:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101509769
vasony (2021-03-22 18:24:30+00:00): ok, thx for the corrections
DressyPear4 (2021-03-22 13:56:29+00:00): Olá, concentre-se em uma área menor, e não mexa em relações da cidade.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101421928
faustopt (2021-03-21 18:34:20+00:00): Vandalização através da deslocação de um nó na Avenida Samora Machel. Reveja as edições antes de enviar. A repetição negligente destes comportamentos será denunciada como VANDALIZAÇÃO.
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
Dodko (2021-03-21 14:23:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785292346
Samotné Jašteričie jazero sa už nachádza severne a je pomenované.
Tu južne je len tabuľa lavičky a studňa.
Ivor Švihran (2021-03-28 04:49:59+00:00): Vďaka, opravujem to.
baumann3141 (2021-03-21 15:53:17+00:00): I think that's only seasonal flooding and not a pond. Check on Bing aerial view!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101422216
JochenOSM (2021-03-21 10:27:45+00:00): Hallo wermak,
in wie fern ist das eine Verbesserung an jedem Kreisel ref= durch unsigned_ref= zu ersetzen? Aus meiner Sicht war der Kreisel vorher korrekt und entsprach den in Deutschland üblichen Standards.
aceman444 (2023-09-26 20:26:47+00:00): Zdravim, ale vytvorit dve prekryvajuce sa vodne plochy (Gabcikovo a Hrusov) tiez nie je najstastnejsie riesenie. Treba to vymysliet inak. Vodne dielo nie je len vodna plocha ale zrejme aj budovy elektrarne a podobne. Aspon podla wiki, ktoru ste pridali. Takze tento objekt vobec nemusi mat natural=water.
*Martin* (2022-01-08 08:54:12+00:00): Ahoj. Ziadnu priepast som tu nenasiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8542787837. Vies mi poslat prosim zdroj odkial su suradnice?
aceman444 (2022-01-25 09:06:02+00:00): Zdroj ZMVM :) A Bing...
Zial zdroje tohto autora su vacsinou tajne a s otaznou relevantnostou, casto pridavaju akesi stare nazvy.
*Martin* (2022-01-25 09:12:29+00:00): Ivor mi odpovedal cez iny komunikacny kanal:

Zdravím. Vyzerá, že som to bral z Enviroportálu, ale už si moc nepamätám.

https://envirozataze.enviroportal.sk/Lokalita-zataze/RV-(013)-Silica-Zvoniva-priepast-register-C
aceman444 (2022-07-09 18:45:56+00:00): Prave preto by mal riadne pisat zdroje, aby si to nemusel pamatat.
Ake je tu teda riesenie?
*Martin* (2022-07-10 07:32:40+00:00): Ked tam bude pokrytie DMR 5.0 tak to pojdem precesat :-)
DressyPear4 (2021-03-24 20:38:11+00:00): Olá, árvores individuais podem ser mapeadas como apenas um ponto.
Você pode usar  Copiar e Colar para facilitar o trabalho.
"Árvore em ambiente urbano" não deve ser adicionado no nome
❤️‍🔥 (2021-03-21 01:45:05+00:00): Hi, thanks for the contribution!

You've tagged the covid testing station as natural=heath, which is a type of grass (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:natural=heath)

for a covid19 testing station, you should replace natural=heath with:

healthcare=sample_collection
healthcare:speciality=covid19
temporary=yes
website=https://covid19.govt.nz
Michael_Shapleski (2021-03-21 08:28:48+00:00): Oops, that was meant to be Health. (but true that Natural:health does not make sense either) One needs to be careful.. Thanks for the feedback kylenz! 
I have added your suggestions.
faustopt (2021-03-21 15:45:19+00:00): Nome Incorreto/Utilização abusiva de marca Registada - A utilização da marca "Kónica" para identificar Centros de Cópias/Fotografia é incorreta. "Konica" é uma marca registada (Hoje Konica-Minolta) e a sua identificação em estabelecimentos que nada tem a ver com a referida marca não só é errado como induz em erro para quem procura serviços de venda/manutenção da referida marca. A utilização de nomes informais está bem documentada na wiki e deve ser consultada em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:name 
Neste caso específico deve ser incluida a Etiqueta Nome Local (loc_name=) pois essa designação representa um regionalismo ou nome local pelo qual estes estabelecimentos são conhecidos em Angola, tal como no Brasil são conhecidos por “Xerox”.
A Edição será alterada para:
name=Centro de Cópias/Fotografia
loc_name=Kónica
mueschel (2021-03-22 11:29:14+00:00): Please check the nodes you edited in this town - there are ~ 100 with strange tags like

ogr_pkid=2687C20F667F01860EA9950CC658FD3B_Address_4357
tipo=R
Alex_Mapper (2021-03-22 11:43:43+00:00): Oops, that (and "tipo") came from the original dataset (the way i was doing it was copying the nodes and changing the tags, likely i forgot to delete for this one), it is the identifier they used for the address nodes, it's now fixed, thanks for pointing it out
ZLima12 (2021-10-25 22:55:41+00:00): There are some turn restrictions that prevent against entering roads tagged as access=no. These kinds of relations are unnecessary.
Johnny Mapperseed (2021-03-21 03:09:28+00:00): Accidentally used old changeset comment. Used bing aerial imagery.
Reza_koulivand (2021-03-21 08:32:18+00:00): سلام خسته نباشین،لطفن با GPX منطبق کنید،مپ باکس خطاش زیاده
heretofore (2023-03-27 20:32:50+00:00): Is Douglas Ave really paving stones? That seems kind of unlikely to me.
abflts (2023-03-27 23:25:29+00:00): Good catch!  I must have mistyped in StreetComplete.  I will correct it now.
heretofore (2023-03-28 14:11:46+00:00): Thanks! I would have scrolled right by it, but iD has special outlines for certain surfaces now. =)
fortchagos (2021-03-22 18:09:27+00:00): Elliot, just saw the you split the woods along Cascade creek.  There is no clearing across the creek - it's covered by woods with trees right on the stream bank.  It seems overboard to go through all that effort when there is no clearing. Same thing with Norris Lane - it's all covered by woods.  You'll save yourself a lot of work by not splitting these and it will be more accurate as someone on the ground would expect a clearing along the length of the stream.  A rule of thumb I use is if I can't see a clearing in summer imagery then don't add one.  I can see you're putting a lot of effort into this.  Thanks.
ElliottPlack (2021-03-23 13:41:14+00:00): Thank you! I would normally just leave the woods covering the creek and trail, as you said, but I'm trying to prevent the woods from appearing "under" the green park polygons on the main map. This is mapping for the renderer in its truest form, which I normally avoid. However, the park managers are confused by the multicolored areas. The more I go down that rabbit hole (and thank you for mentioning it) the more I'm thinking about switching the park areas over to leisure=nature_reserve. There is much debate in the community over whether large forested "parks" fit the definition of a park by the original design.

I split them up because when the woods are smaller than the park, the woods appear on top. It is annoying. What do you think?
fortchagos (2021-03-24 01:56:56+00:00): See my latest woods edits for two solutions.  The first, I removed the woods ways next to Cascade Creek and made the creek an outer member of the woods multipolygons on either side.  In the second, I split another section of woods into two by simply breaking the ways and jumping across the woods with a straight line segment.  Two woods segments adjacent in the editor render as one.  Does this help?
ElliottPlack (2021-03-24 02:25:01+00:00): Thanks for the help. Ideally I think we'd cover the full park with its landuse/landcover so that the underlying "green" area doesn't show. But if you pan west, I just made a bunch of area changes based on Ranger Joe's new plan so now areas like Davis overlap the larger tree area. We could split that tree area up but it does feel a bit like whack-a-mole to do that...
ElliottPlack (2021-03-24 02:28:27+00:00): My question to you is what are your thoughts on changing the PVSP park areas from leisure=park to leisure=nature reserve. Fundamentally the only different between PVSP and a big wildlife management area like Patuxent or Soldier's Delight is just the name. They all have trails and allow recreation. The philosophy is that a true OSM park is a manicured urban park, like Patterson Park, and that these big wooded area 'parks' should be classified nature reserve instead. If I changed all 20 park areas to nature reserve, they'd look a bit different on the map and some websites might show them differently. However, once all the landcover is drawn, they look quite nice. Check out Loch Raven Reservoir for instance.
fortchagos (2021-03-24 03:14:46+00:00): Splitting the tree area into many small manageable areas (adjacent multipolygons) is exactly what you want to do to make life easier. 
 There are some pretty complex multipolygons that are hard to manage here. Nature preserve seems more appropriate.
user_11418917 (2021-03-25 06:35:07+00:00): *Road is open now.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101425518
eggie (2021-03-21 06:07:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback.. Kleine aanpassing verricht. De info samengevoegd met de BAG adresnodes.
format phone= +31 aangepast. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
ZeLonewolf (2021-03-30 22:02:28+00:00): Hello AmazonMapMap27, this edit has created a gap in the Eastport boundary (relation 175742).  Are you able to fix this?
augxcgrwxo (2021-03-24 11:05:22+00:00): Добрый день! У меня уточнение про покрытие этой улицы и знак. Правильно ли я понимаю, что стоит знак запрета на движение автомобилей? Или тут очень неровная поверхность и нельзя проехать на машинах и внедорожниках?
Владимир К (2022-04-19 18:02:28+00:00): к сожалению вы использовали неверные теги для обозначения проходимости. я верну назад. вы можете добавить тег smoothness ля обозначения проходимости 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:smoothness
blackboxlogic (2021-03-24 01:24:46+00:00): Thanks for adding these islets and making them role:inner for the relation. I would move the details (like name) from the original boundary (way 146140456) to the relation. As it is, the way and the relation both have names, and they don't agree.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101425782
Leonard Ehrenfried (2021-03-22 16:04:47+00:00): I think there is a typo in the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8542972665 isn't it?
rtbk (2021-03-23 06:44:07+00:00): Good pickup Leonard! Have corrected
elotrojames (2021-03-26 23:03:23+00:00): This changeset deleted lots of nodes that are part of a house mapping process. The nodes with the tag "ref:INVU" are going to be reverted. If you have comments about the tags used please open a discussion before deleting the nodes. The data about Erizo Juan Santamaría is collected using GPX traces since the aerial imagery is outdated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101426179
G_P_J (2021-03-21 17:30:13+00:00): W adresie brak miejscowości.
下り専門 (2021-03-21 08:30:03+00:00): はじめまして。OpenStreetMapへようこそ。このエリアのBing航空画像には歪みがあります。右メニューの背景画像設定から「国土地理院 全国最新写真(シームレス)」を選ぶとより正確です。（ただしちょっと古いのでBing航空画像と使い分けるのが良いかと思います。）日本のBing写真がイマイチな話はこちら。 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nyampire/diary/36310
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101426610
pra_veen (2021-04-01 05:50:33+00:00): Hi mapper,
found incorrect highway classification of way 606869852, which was later fixed by user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/willisturm.
with corrected changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101509678 . Kindly check with the link.
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101426658
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
pra_veen (2021-04-01 05:50:40+00:00): Hi mapper,
found incorrect highway classification of way 272125936, which was later fixed by user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Aralqum.
with corrected changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102081192 . Kindly check with the link.
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101426676
pra_veen (2021-03-31 11:26:57+00:00): Hi mapper,
fixed incorrect alignment of service way 456742345 joining to building.
kindly look into the corrected changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102051405
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101427066
spughetti (2024-04-11 11:05:21+00:00): This changeset added many low quality and nonexistent buildings, Microsoft Building Footprints are not meant for bulk importing. Perhaps this changeset should be reverted.
zluuzki (2024-04-13 09:45:03+00:00): I removed the buildings added. 

If thats now actually an improvement is debatable.
martinst (2022-01-18 17:23:51+00:00): Macht recycling:glass=christian hier Sinn?
Andreas König (2022-01-18 17:53:01+00:00): nö, ist wohl ein Fehler mit der automatischen Ausfüllfunktion beim eingeben der Tags im Editor, einfach mal nicht aufgepasst...kann weg.
Andreas
martinst (2022-01-18 18:04:24+00:00): Könntest Du das erledigen? Ich weiß ja nicht ob da yes oder no stehen muss.
Andreas König (2022-01-18 18:24:42+00:00): mach ich beim nächsten Edit
Andreas König (2022-01-20 15:59:15+00:00): erledigt.
user_5359 (2021-03-21 18:26:59+00:00): Hello! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

Please see https://www.osm.org/node/8543103601
Kovoschiz (2021-03-21 08:16:48+00:00): Please check there is `change:lanes=` here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101428141
Kovoschiz (2021-03-21 08:21:40+00:00): Please also follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways instead of meaninglessly distributing them.
mappinglander (2021-03-21 15:10:24+00:00): Merhabalar, 
Yaptığınız düzenlemenin gözden geçirilmesini istediğiniz için düzenlemeye baktım ve size geri bildirim vermek istedim. Düzenlemeniz gayet iyi gözüküyor.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101428346
Cristoffs (2021-03-21 18:38:59+00:00): Cześć! Na jakiej podstawie dodajesz te budynki, bo na żadnym podkładzie ich jeszcze nie ma.
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-11-28 07:04:31+00:00): Deleted data due overlapping with other building.
Illio (2021-03-21 09:27:01+00:00): Odkiaľ máte tento bod "Eresztvény" a čo označuje? Na žiadnej mape som to nenašiel.
Viktor Voda (2021-03-21 11:36:40+00:00): To je správne lokálne označenie. Môžete si preveriť na obecnom úrade obce Silica.
Illio (2021-03-21 17:02:55+00:00): Ešte raz, aký zdroj ste použili? Prosím, uveďte ho do značky "source". Local knowledge nie je zdroj.
Tomas Kovacik (2021-03-22 08:39:20+00:00): ale je to zdroj, dokonca 2hy najlepsi
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.1
otazka je ako sa slovenska alternativa dostala do katastralnej mapy, pan viktor by si mal uvedomit, ze tie slovenske nazvy si nikto z komunity nevymyslel.
Viktor Voda (2021-03-22 10:02:30+00:00): ba,vymyslel. Boli tu pridané v rámci nášho katastra také sprostosti Korotnok-Kratník. V katastrálnej mape sú chybne uvedené niektoré pomenovania i ked u niektorých sa dá prekladať do slovenčiny u niektorých nemá význam ani pomadarsky, napr Hujop, Dranga,Lüköbérc. Do leta chcem dokončiť celú planinu s miestnym polovnikom a korektné názvy budú v  uvedene na stránke obce Silica,silica.sk. Viktor Voda, zást. starostu
Tomas Kovacik (2021-03-22 11:03:36+00:00): chapem, zmeny by v prvom rade mali smerovat do katastralnej mapy, potom sa upravia v OSM, nie naopak. Tie data su prebrane, z kapor-u prave koli tomu aby si to hocikto nemenil podla toho ako mu to niekto pred 5rokmi povedal. Co sa tyka zmien na velkej ploche, moze dochadzat k stretom v pomenovaniach s mapermi z inych okolitych obci preto, s tym treba ratat, ich "local knowledge" nieje onic horsi/menej spravny ako Vas. Su to predsa len pomenovania lokalit v hovorenom slove, nic oficialne, a preto sa mozu lisit
*Martin* (2021-03-22 12:05:56+00:00): Pozrite si https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa?bm=zbgis&z=15&c=20.523277,48.553935&sc=n# kde najdete standardizovane geograficke nazvoslovie (https://www.geoportal.sk/sk/udaje/udaje-zbgis/geograficke-nazvoslovie/). Tam ziadne madarske nazvy nevidim.
Illio (2021-03-22 13:14:17+00:00): Pán píše "Môžete si preveriť na obecnom úrade obce Silica", ale neuvádza zdroj na žiadny dokument. Vraví, že v katastrálnej mape sú chyby, ale opäť argumentuje len svojou lokálnou znalosťou.

Riešením by mohlo byť, nech sú teda také názvy označené ako loc_name, nie ako name. Keďže ich očividne poznajú a používajú iba (niektorí) obyvatelia Silice, ale inak nie sú nikde uvádzané, tak by to tomu celkom zodpovedalo.
*Martin* (2021-03-22 13:18:07+00:00): V takom pripade suhlasim s loc_name.
Viktor Voda (2021-03-22 13:25:52+00:00): Ok. Ako obec požiadame teda o zmenu v prvom rade kataster. Názvy sú zle zadané a nezodpovedajú skutočnosti a skutočnej polohe. Slovenské názvy sú zle prekladané alebo sú nezmyselne vymyslené. (napr. Silička na doline - nesie názov naďvöďfej( v preklade Hlava velkej doliny)).A nech nie je človek nasratý ked nejaký jazykový expert vymyslí napr na Korotnok Kratník.To je logika slováka.Nedá sa preložiť?Googletranslate nechápe?Vymyslíme i ked k.k.t.nu. Len nech to nie je pomadarsky .Preto sere človeka,lebo je to zásah do skutočnosti.Každý siličan vie kde má ísť,ked sa povie šajtňomó ( v preklade - miesto kde sa tlačí syr),  Silička..v skutočnosti asoňšeg( ženská riť).Podbúčie (podbíčíe -keď už , bikaalja, doslovný predklad spodok býka( áno,ten)Sú to niekedy vtipné pomenovania  a nedajú sa preložiť, lebo nemajú  význam ani pomaďarsky ,napr. Hujop,Horpota,Kazlak,Dranga,Korotnok.Dufam že ma rozumiete.Do konca leta bude hotová mapovanie planiny.na OSM už ani nedám, rovno požiadam o zápis do katastra.S pozdravom Viktor Voda, zástupca starostu obce Silica
*Martin* (2021-03-22 13:31:08+00:00): Dakujem. Ked to bude v katastri, resp. v standardizovanom nazvoslovi, tak sa to do mapy casom premietne.