piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2019-03-09 14:14:29+00:00): Zase indoor:level?
mavl (2018-01-27 16:02:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:56:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:53:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:56:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-27 19:56:23+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55777763
user_5359 (2018-01-27 06:08:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes. Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2952532462/history ? I have merge your from the building to the node to avoids duplicate entries.
mavl (2018-01-27 15:51:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
user_5359 (2018-01-27 06:01:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your object please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:46:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:54:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Superadlen (2018-01-26 16:59:43+00:00): merci kho  khassitna fi el group
mavl (2018-01-27 15:51:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
user_5359 (2018-01-26 21:51:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes. Please read also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dstudio for a better description.
user_5359 (2018-01-26 21:47:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If in the building  is a school, please add also amenity=school.
JJIglesias (2018-01-26 18:06:23+00:00): Dennis Gracias por Colaborar con #OSM_BO, podrias tratar de ayudarnos mas colocando los nombres de las calles adyacentes a la Bonifacio Games
Slds
JJ
mavl (2018-01-27 15:50:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:51:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Constable (2018-01-26 21:14:48+00:00): what's that stuff?
iandees (2018-01-26 22:00:55+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55787797
freebeer (2018-01-26 23:06:51+00:00): What a mess.  Multiple overlapping university areas, the whole grounds covered by a mulotiple fake parks, un-quadrilateralised buildings across Naniloa Road, constantly changing land/water-uses.
OpenStreetMap is not a plaground, nor a store for fictional information and made-up parks.
yaas3 (2018-01-26 23:17:56+00:00): Pokemon go people. Its all been fixed now.
iandees (2018-01-26 23:23:02+00:00): yaas3, can you talk about why you added all these duplicate leisure=park ways?
Constable (2018-01-27 10:46:36+00:00): @yaas3 make sure you read this one please
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
DD1GJ (2018-01-27 00:17:28+00:00): Revert 55779505: Pokémon-Vandalismis mit weiteren Schäden (verschobene Hausnummer)

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
mavl (2018-01-27 15:56:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:49:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
sorcrosc (2018-04-29 01:15:59+00:00): Con questa modifica hai etichettato l'intera area residenziale come ospedale. Puoi controllare?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7937738
mavl (2018-01-27 15:56:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
DD1GJ (2018-01-27 01:07:33+00:00): Hallo BeDeCe, die von Dir als Park eingezeichneten Flächen sehen auf den Luftbildern eher aus wie gepflegte Grasflächen (landuse=grass) oder Kleingartenflächen. Da du kürzlich 16 Parks im Pfarrwald angelegt hattest, sicherheitshalber folgender Hinweis:

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/

Wie alles bei OSM funktieniert kannst Du hier nachlesen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
BeDeCe (2018-01-27 04:35:00+00:00): hallo, das ist dort ein gebiet wo sich kleingärten befinden. was möchte ich mit pokémon ?
DD1GJ (2018-01-27 08:25:39+00:00): Gemütlich im Garten bei einem Bier sitzen und bequem Pokémons fangen?

Spaß beiseite und Danke für Deine Rückmeldung. Dann trage bitte auch Kleingärten sowie Grasflächen und keine Parkflächen ein. Deshalb hatte ich Dir auch die anderen Links geschickt, wo u.a. die verschiedenen Landnutzungen beschrieben werden.

Wie Du gelesen hast, gibt es bei OSM derzeit ein massives Problem nit Neueinsteigern, die aus allem einen Park machen. Daher achten wir derzeit bei der Qualitätssicherung äußerst genau auf die Einhaltung der Kriterien.
BeDeCe (2018-01-27 08:30:01+00:00): bier klingt immer gut :D
danke für die hinweise. habe es schon geändert.
DD1GJ (2018-01-27 00:28:39+00:00): Revert 55779767 55779431 55779396 55779178: Pokémon-Vandalismis mit weiteren Schäden (verschobener Wegpunkt)

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
user_5359 (2018-01-26 21:32:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Constable (2018-02-08 10:28:35+00:00): anche questo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552821531#map=19/39.22725/9.12651 è davvero un parco? ci sono bambini che giocano a palla nel prato?
viloan (2018-01-26 17:41:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-27 19:57:46+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55779982
mavl (2018-01-27 15:49:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-27 20:04:31+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55780059
mavl (2018-01-27 15:50:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Tom Layo (2018-10-15 07:52:20+00:00): Node 5359798943 and adjacent nodes are far from the course of the main road, which has GPS data.
RVR002 (2018-10-16 18:30:08+00:00): Hi Tom,

We will adjust the secondary road of course, but it was not aligned by us, we just connected to it.

-Jeff
Tom Layo (2018-10-19 12:28:26+00:00): Right. But if you goal is to actually make a map, you just need to do this sort of thing. Not hard.
Madeline Steele (2018-02-01 20:39:46+00:00): Hello there! FYI, private streets, especially named ones like these, should definitely be included in the map. They are tagged as access=private so that routers will not direct people onto them. (see https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/7424/private-access-roads). Also, these two are included in the Metro RLIS dataset. They're legit! As such, I'm reverting this changeset.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-27 20:09:37+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55780345
mavl (2018-01-27 15:46:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
S-zation (2018-01-28 01:09:07+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.  Please don't vandalize the map by painting over residential areas with fake landuses or fake parks for Pokemon Go.
DD1GJ (2018-01-26 20:11:20+00:00): Hallo Man U, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. In dieem "Park" stehen aber sehr viele Autos herum.

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/

Wenn Du weiter aus jeder kleinsten Grünfläche einen Park machst besteht die Gefahr, dass Deine Beiträge komplett zurückgesetzt werden. Das Heraussortieren von Brauchbarem ist zu aufwändig.
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-14 15:05:01+00:00): Surface=asphalt, aber grade2, das passt meines Erachtens nicht zusammen.
muralito (2018-03-06 15:49:48+00:00): Juan, por favor no hagas cambios como este.

Acá eliminaste los limites de Ramon Blaus.

¿Cual fue tu intencion?
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:49:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-26 19:09:07+00:00): Hi Alyssa1, welcome to OSM. Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55780785
mavl (2018-01-27 15:51:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:48:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:52:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 15:50:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
mavl (2018-01-27 16:01:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Tom Layo (2018-10-18 03:30:12+00:00): Hi, way 508519525 is clearly not a residential road. Should be unclassified.
Jeff Underwood (2018-10-18 21:59:15+00:00): Hi Tom,
I updated that road to unclassified.

Thanks for the feedback,
Jeff
Tom Layo (2018-10-19 12:20:14+00:00): Thank you, Jeff. I hope this change is not just a 'one off', this sort of thing is rife.
mavl (2018-01-27 15:56:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
Sysem (2018-06-01 09:32:42+00:00): Ich bitte dich deine Änderungen (note zu description) zu reverten. In der Zeit der PLZ Konsolidierung wurde sich auf note geeinigt, hier nachzulesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Konsolidierung_der_PLZ-Relationen_in_Deutschland_2013
Protoxenus (2018-06-01 15:48:46+00:00): Gegenfrage: 
hast du dich überhaupt mal damit beschäftigt, was ich hier vom Schlüssel "note" auf den Schlüssel "description" geändert habe?
Wenn ja, dann muss ich daraus schließen, dass du das Prinzip der Schlüssel nicht verstanden hast. Wenn nein, dann weiß ich nicht, was du überhaupt von mir willst. In Foren nennt man so etwas trollen.
Schönen Tag noch
Protoxenus
Sysem (2018-06-01 16:58:05+00:00): Wenn du dich durch meine Nachricht provoziert fühlst, tut es mir leid.

Ja, du hast bei einigen PLZ Relationen den Schlüssel "note" durch "description:de" ersetzt, siehe bspw. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1086510

Falls ich etwas falsch verstehe, dann erkläre es mir bitte. Auf jeden Fall fehlt, nach deiner Änderung, in den entsprechenden PLZ Relationen der Schlüssel "note".
Protoxenus (2018-06-02 09:15:38+00:00): Hallo,
nachdem du den link auf die Relation gesetzt hast, verstehe ich dein Begehren. Dass ich an einer PLZ-Relation rumgefummlet habe, war mir so nicht bewusst. 
Ich hatte in einem ersten Post, der sich allgemein auf den Änderungssatz bezog, nur die Änderungen an anderen notes->desription nachvollziehen können. Deswegen auch meine harrsche Reaktion. Entschuldige bitte.
Aber mal zum Kernproblem der Sache:
Laut Definition wird der Schlüssel "note" dazu verwendet, um auf Fehler, Probleme und ungelöste Dingen beim Kartieren hinzuweisen. Zitat: "A note is used to inform other mappers about non-obvious information about an element,
 the author's intent when creating it, or hints for further improvement."
Ich weiß, in der Anfangszeit von OSM war das nicht so. Damals wurde der Schlüssel als allgemeine, unstrukturierte Bemerkung verwendet. Um ergänzende Bemerkungen zu einem node, einem way oder einer relation zu machen,
 wird jetzt description oder description:[Länderkürzel] verwendet.
 Deswegen, so finde ich, ist die Verwendung in der Postleitzahlen-Relation falsch. Es hätte dort ein eigener, neuer Schlössel verwendet werden müssen und nicht einer, der eine andere Bedeutung hat, umgebogen werden.
Wenn ich unterwegs bin, gucke ich mit OSMAND oder zu Hause mit JOSM nach notes, um eventuell ungelöste Probleme zu finden und zu beseitigen. Und dabei ist mir wahrscheinlich die PLZ-Relation zufällig unter die Maus gekommen. 
So und jetzt kommst du: Für die Auswertung der PLZ-Relation ist meine Änderung vielleicht ein Problem, für das Projekt OSM ist die falsche Verwendung von note in der Relation ein Problem. Was wäre sinnvoller? Sicherlich wird noch der eine oder andere über diese Diskrepanz stolpern.
Gruß Protoxenus
Sysem (2018-06-02 09:50:15+00:00): Dachte schon an ein Missverständnis - ich werde mich das nächste Mal um eine genauere Formulierung bemühen ;)
Da gehe ich mit dir d'accord und wurde in der Konsolidierungsphase schon erkannt: "Der Schlüssel note steht unter Vorbehalt einer zukünftigen Umbennung durch einen geeigneteren Namen."
 - das sollte im Forum mal ausdiskutiert werden.
Sysem (2018-06-02 12:33:48+00:00): Hier noch vollständigkeitshalber alle betreffenden PLZ-Gebiete: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/zgF
Protoxenus (2018-06-03 17:20:02+00:00): Hab es zurückgedreht. Wäre schön, wenn du dich um die Umbenennung von "note" in einen geeigneteren Namen kümmern würdest.
Gruß Protoxenus
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-27 20:14:53+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55781286
scratera (2018-01-26 18:38:43+00:00): intanto ben arrivato e poi se posso permettermi non usare bing in quanto no è allineato alla realta ma se puoi usa il portale geografico nazionale
Константин Гам (2019-05-17 11:48:19+00:00): Убедительная просьба не писать в названии обьектов описательные характеристики и рекламные слоганы!

"гранд-кафе "Шарден" (грузинская кухня)" = Шарден
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-27 20:23:24+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55781322
DD1GJ (2018-01-26 19:06:54+00:00): Revert 55781351 55781320 55781251 55781221 55781161 55781140, und sonstigen Datenmüll gelöscht, Pokémon-Vandalismus.

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
hsc666 (2018-01-27 15:43:14+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM. Ich musste diesen CS zurücksetzen, da Du ganz Hangelar zu einem Park geändert hast. Bitte sei vorsichtig mit Deinen Änderungen! Sieh Dich im Wiki um, oder frage im Forum, wenn Du nicht sicher bist.
VG
hsc666
mavl (2018-01-27 16:00:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
GerdP (2018-09-29 08:09:19+00:00): Hi! Please review typo highway=ere
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/531343319
RVR002 (2018-10-01 18:37:23+00:00): Hi GerdP,

Thanks for the heads up. I've fixed the highway type.

-Jeff
azsr (2018-01-30 19:00:26+00:00): Hi. There is only one major problem with your changeset, and that is that most of the roads you have drawn should be some flavor of highway=service rather than highway=residential, because they don't carry traffic to houses.

If you want me to help clean up, message me.

Thanks!
Glassman (2018-01-26 20:38:06+00:00): Did you mean landuse=forest instead of natural=wood? Forest implies that the area is harvested while natural=wood just means a bunch of trees.
KitSEA (2018-01-26 21:09:47+00:00): Thank you for the clarification! In that case, it should be natural=wood.
Glassman (2018-01-26 23:11:34+00:00): It's a mistake we all make. It's really just a subtle difference and on the scheme of things not that big a deal. It's not like someone is going to come in next week and start cutting down trees.
azsr (2018-01-30 19:05:10+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55781980
mavl (2018-01-27 15:47:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55804218 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert changesets. Reason: poor mapping, useless changes, deleting, damage].
hsc666 (2018-01-27 15:55:35+00:00): Bitte ändere keine Objekte, ohne entsprechende Nachweise oder Quellenangaben. Deine Änderung ist mit keinem bekannten Luftbild zu plausibilisieren. Außerdem ist das Verkleben von Landuses mit administrativen Grenzen äußerst schwierig zu pflegen.
Auch dieses CS wurde deshalb revertet.