piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Geography Canada (2016-12-09 16:03:50+00:00): Deutsch: Vielleicht sollten Sie Knoten 1 zurückgeben? Knoten 1 ist etwas ganz besonderes: D! 

Français: Peut-être que vous devez retourner le nœud 1 ? Nœud 1 est très spécial :D!
Geography Canada (2016-12-09 16:11:37+00:00): Retournez node 1 (trés spécial!)?
Geography Canada (2016-12-09 16:16:55+00:00): "Wieso?".

See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44081278. "Somewhere I read about buggy software which erroneously uses low IDs for internal reasons. In order to prevent problems related to this, I tried to remove as many low IDs as possible.". Maybe exclude node 1? It is extraordinarily special on OSM.
Jojo4u (2017-02-12 14:46:58+00:00): ""Somewhere I read about buggy software"... This is no valid reason for replacing nodes. "Don't tag for the renderer - and of course for buggy software as well".
demon_box (2017-01-16 23:07:53+00:00): ciao mettere il numero del sentiero come "S. 17" sul tag name non è corretto, semmai si mette sul tag ref. in questo caso è tra l'altro un dato superfluo perchè tutto il percorso del sentiero 17 è già mappato come tale dalla relazione relativa
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5397187
grazie, ciao
Chetan_Gowda (2017-01-25 09:59:14+00:00): Reverted the changeset!
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:30:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 10:13:42+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
indigomc (2016-12-12 20:41:33+00:00): Hi Abhishek Kumar007

You appear to have used your account to make test edits. Please do not do so, it will affect the live map. I've reverted your changes. 
Thanks, user indigomc
indigomc (2016-12-06 19:18:28+00:00): What is this name meg2 that you added to a road please?
indigomc (2016-12-06 19:18:59+00:00): And what is a 'tertiary one way road'?
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:28:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 10:13:08+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:25:52+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 10:12:42+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
indigomc (2016-12-06 19:05:53+00:00): You deleted a major road, KRS Road in the changeset below, and replaced it with a short road with an unusual name. Please say why.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:25:29+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 10:12:08+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Göre (2016-12-01 12:36:32+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56586
demon_box (2017-02-27 15:54:34+00:00): ciao:
surface="sterrato_ghiaia_e_terra."
non esiste ed è quindi sbagliato.
consulta qui:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:surface
grazie.
Chetan_Gowda (2017-01-25 09:40:09+00:00): Hi veena B S, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You can make free edits, share and download OpenStreetMap data. In this specific changeset, you have created fiction roads and gave personal/friend's names to them. Also, you have deleted a long water canal. Please avoid deleting and adding bad stuff. Please follow OSM guidelines to edit and learn from http://learnosm.org/en/ tutorial. It's really nice. Let me know if you need any help. 

Chetan
RicoElectrico (2016-12-01 15:29:13+00:00): Masz rację, chodzi oczywiście o tego pana, co potwierdza rejestr TERYT. Ale wypadałoby przy okazji zmienić odniesienia w adresach, co właśnie zrobiłem.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:24:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4000027371 ? Your entry is a duplicate node.
indigomc (2016-12-01 18:22:00+00:00): Please don't play with the live map. If you need to learn read the guidance or ask for advice in the forums.
GerdP (2017-08-26 05:18:34+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed this changeset because you've used highway=mini_roundabout on a way. The tag is meant to be used on nodes only.
The sat image seems to show an obstacle in the middle, in this case it would be a junction=roundabout
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
indigomc (2016-12-01 18:20:56+00:00): Please don't play with the live map. If you need to learn read the guidance or ask for advice in the forums.
BCNorwich (2016-12-04 19:37:48+00:00): Hello, why map this heath area on top of the already mapped forest areas? It really doesn't make much sense, especially as it's very easy to map the areas correctly from the Bing image that you seem to be traceing.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:19:01+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:19:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 09:52:31+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:17:28+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Rom1 (2016-12-01 11:24:50+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai supprimé le tag name sur cette portion de route car il s'agissait d'une description. Sur le terrain, cette route ne porte pas de nom en soi.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:16:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
sergeybe (2017-04-15 06:22:27+00:00): От  куда взяли название "Лобан гора", если не секрет?
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:14:18+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
BCNorwich (2016-12-08 15:05:48+00:00): More self intersections of area outline.
Plus now including large obvious areas of water in you natural=heath.
Please take time to map things properly.
andi9876 (2016-12-01 15:23:05+00:00): Hi, please stop add viewpoints.
Ale_Zena_IT (2016-12-07 20:07:52+00:00): Ma Robi car non è sufficiente mapparlo una volta sola?
E la targa della via è talmente antica che merita il tag historic=memorial?
EneaSuper (2016-12-07 20:12:21+00:00): Robi Car ha ben due accessi e la cosa mi ha fatto dubitare...

La targa è vecchia ma non antica, l'unica particolarità che mi ha portato a mapparla è il fatto che non si trovi all'imbocco della via come al solito xD

Qui puoi visionare tutto: https://www.google.it/maps/@44.4855332,8.9003979,3a,75y,277.01h,92.9t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sejQbI2CiCFjtI3HnDXJGqg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=it
dan980 (2016-12-07 21:53:14+00:00): Capita spesso di trovare esercizi commerciali con più ingressi. In questi casi io individuo (ove possibile) l'ingresso principale e piazzo solo lì le etichette. Oppure sull'edificio, se completamente dedicato a tale attività. In entrambi i casi ai nodi degli ingressi aggiungo i numeri civici (se presenti).

Per la targa della strada sono curioso, se fossi in te chiederei a qualche abitante della via ;)
EneaSuper (2016-12-08 10:06:41+00:00): Attraverso delle ricerche ho scoperto che l'accesso da me inserito per ultimo è quello corretto, è una questione di civici :)
La targa non è sufficientemente vecchia o addirittura storica per essere inserita a questo punto, ora modifico!
FabioPadovani (2023-06-29 10:04:57+00:00): Presso il numero civico 5 di Piazza della Vittoria a Treviso si trova (attualmente non segnalato sulla mappa) lo studio di tatuaggi e piercing Alex De Pase Stores Treviso.

Vorrei sapere come inserirlo in questa mappa perché poi sia visibile anche sulla mappa di Instagram.
ivanbranco (2023-06-29 11:49:21+00:00): Ciao Fabio, puoi lasciare una nota alle giuste coordinate con le informazioni del caso o aggiungerlo tu stesso: https://learnosm.org/it/
sergeybe (2017-04-15 06:24:49+00:00): От куда взяли названия гор Верблюд и Батон?
BCNorwich (2016-12-08 15:07:50+00:00): Hi, a lot of the area you have mapped as heath is actually forest.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:12:43+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
sergeybe (2017-04-15 06:27:26+00:00): Что за туристическая достопримечательность "Бухта Провато" расположенное совсем не в том месте?
Alexey Lukin (2016-12-19 02:55:08+00:00): This moves the Red Line away from its accurate track alignment established in a changeset 31029556. Apparently a mistake that has to be reverted.
ToeBee (2016-12-24 05:54:16+00:00): Please do not add fictional things to OpenStreetMap. These have already been removed by someone else.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 20:10:21+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
BeKri (2016-12-01 17:48:28+00:00): Servus zarl,
irgendwie wird jetzt aber alles "lila zugegleistert" ...
Ausserdem ist nicht das gesamte Gelände
ein helipad sondern letztlich nur die bereits eingezeichneten Flächen.
Ich würde das nochmal überdenken.
Gruss BeKri
zarl (2016-12-02 12:34:44+00:00): Ach du dickes Ei, das Rendering hatte ich so nicht erwartet. Das Gelände ist aber auch nicht als Helipad eingetragen, sondern als... aaargh, tatsächlich: es sollte ein aeroway=heliport sein. Ich korrigiere das gleich, Danke für den Hinweis!

Ist jetzt geändert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44113156 - dich habe ich in der "source" verewigt :-)

Viele Grüsse,
Zarl
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:49:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44426389, 44387070, 44397974, 44390906, 44369720, 44363338, 44378632, 44444558, 44417849, 44406784, 44334110, 44452814, 44434181, 44359830, 44348987, 44437957, 44412921 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed building footprint imports. Please adhere to import guidelines, and discuss BEFORE you import.
ovruni (2019-01-14 01:10:17+00:00): Hola, parece que hay un error con el etiquetado de opening_hours, falta indicar el horario.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 19:31:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-01 19:31:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-01 19:30:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-01 19:30:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
muralito (2016-12-07 12:36:58+00:00): UTE (las oficinas) seria office=company, al igual que las otras empresas publicas.

office=government es gobierno ya sea nacional o departamental, ministerios, u otras unidades del gobierno. Por ejemplo, URSEA, URSEG y AGESIC serian office=government
user_5359 (2016-12-01 19:29:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44426389, 44387070, 44397974, 44390906, 44369720, 44363338, 44378632, 44444558, 44417849, 44406784, 44334110, 44452814, 44434181, 44359830, 44348987, 44437957, 44412921 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed building footprint imports. Please adhere to import guidelines, and discuss BEFORE you import.
DavidKewley (2016-12-02 02:25:15+00:00): Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM! I see that you improved a couple of buildings, but you also deleted Lewis Hall, which I think may still exist. Did you delete it deliberately, and if so, I'm curious why? -David
DavidKewley (2016-12-25 23:54:40+00:00): Thanks for making a fix in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44224779! I really appreciate it. One suggestion: a reply here would have let us all know you took care of it, without having to look into it further. Thanks again, David
mavl (2016-12-02 16:32:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. Здесь, похоже, ошибка: укрытия обозначены внутри здания.
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-12-01 17:51:46+00:00): Можете уточнить в каком именно здании находится аптека?
mueschel (2016-12-03 15:36:20+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tag "Zwig=Stross" on this way?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29116589

Cheers, Jan
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-12-01 17:54:37+00:00): Для организаций (особенно если они не занимают здание полностью) лучше ставить точку внутри здания и на этой точке проставлять теги.
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-12-01 17:51:06+00:00): Аптека с двумя а на конце это название?
Palolo (2021-02-17 16:34:16+00:00): Geofrey
Do you have evidence of a restaurant at this location? There doesn't appear to be a facility here.
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-12-01 17:45:43+00:00): По какой улице находятся отмеченные вами дома?
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-12-01 21:17:40+00:00): Точнее где эта улица проходит.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:49:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44426389, 44387070, 44397974, 44390906, 44369720, 44363338, 44378632, 44444558, 44417849, 44406784, 44334110, 44452814, 44434181, 44359830, 44348987, 44437957, 44412921 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed building footprint imports. Please adhere to import guidelines, and discuss BEFORE you import.
te5pkig8 (2017-01-06 20:32:50+00:00): Note that you have accidentally deleted NFK, I'm adding it back
http://nfkteszt.elte.hu/
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:49:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44426389, 44387070, 44397974, 44390906, 44369720, 44363338, 44378632, 44444558, 44417849, 44406784, 44334110, 44452814, 44434181, 44359830, 44348987, 44437957, 44412921 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed building footprint imports. Please adhere to import guidelines, and discuss BEFORE you import.
BCNorwich (2016-12-18 12:02:50+00:00): removed as mapped in the wrong place.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:48:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44426389, 44387070, 44397974, 44390906, 44369720, 44363338, 44378632, 44444558, 44417849, 44406784, 44334110, 44452814, 44434181, 44359830, 44348987, 44437957, 44412921 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed building footprint imports. Please adhere to import guidelines, and discuss BEFORE you import.
arvdk (2016-12-01 16:38:26+00:00): Wrong description. In progress of adding 3D information on 'Kubuswoningen' in Rotterdam. WORK IN PROGRESS
SomeoneElse (2016-12-01 18:00:57+00:00): This is another huge changeset - please try and restrict the geographical area of them so that local users can easily see locally affected data.
nyuriks (2016-12-01 18:47:23+00:00): @SomeoneElse, thanks, makes sense. I am trying to finish admin-level=6, whose leftovers are scattered around the globe. Do you know an easy way to select an area in JOSM, and from it select all participating relations? This way I can upload one area at a time.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-01 22:49:13+00:00): I'm probably not the best person to ask, but maybe download what you want (using Overpass if necessary because of the area), then just select what you want with the mouse?  If you're working through a list, maybe the JOSM "todo" plugin would help (assuming it's still called that, and still a plugin)?
PT-53 (2016-12-03 08:45:58+00:00): Hallo Geofalke,

im OSM-Inspector - View Geometry wird hier (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.12397&lat=48.41126&zoom=17&opacity=0.34) für dieses landuse https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291319898#map=18/48.41052/9.12361 eine Fehlermeldung "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt 

Kümmerst Du Dich darum ?

Grüße aus Oberschwaben
Geofalke (2016-12-03 09:26:27+00:00): Hallo und danke für den HInweis! ist erledigt.
Grüße aus Oberbayern nach Oberschwaben
user_5359 (2016-12-01 19:26:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
highflyer74 (2016-12-05 14:49:50+00:00): Hello!

Please be so kind to adjust the tagging to fit the OSM Wiki, e.g. here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457035127.

Thank you!
xmd5a (2017-01-05 17:33:37+00:00): Это tertiary - дорога, соединяющая три населённых пункта. К тому же хороший асфальт. Возвращаю обратно.
Kostik (2017-01-06 06:48:16+00:00): С чего бы это вдруг? И какое отношение к классу дороги имеет покрытие? Это может быть и грунтовка, но дорога местного значения.
DenisJu (2017-01-18 18:53:59+00:00): Sidorela, a mund ta shohësh edhe njëherë këtë changeset, pasi ndoshta gabimisht i ke bërë tag gjithë hapësirës si "building=hotel"?
Sidorela (2017-01-18 21:50:19+00:00): Ke te drejtë e kam bërë në fillimet e mia në OSM, e korigjova dhe besoj tashmë është në rregull.
user_5359 (2016-12-01 19:10:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A pond didn’t have a address (This is part of the main building).
user_5359 (2016-12-01 18:58:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your school please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
user_5359 (2016-12-01 18:56:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I see the aerial images are to old to paint the building, but it will be a good idea to add a node with amenity=place_of_worship (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship)
bergaufsee (2017-04-26 18:04:36+00:00): Hallo Hedaja, meinst du mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457036442 evtl. building=garage :) ?
Hedaja (2017-04-27 07:20:06+00:00): ups...das ist mir durchgerutscht. Habs korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis
indigomc (2016-12-01 18:33:43+00:00): Is there really a stadium where you marked it at Tirupati please? Why have you also marked it as a hospital?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-26 00:15:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672506 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-26 00:15:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672506 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
dooley (2016-12-05 22:08:48+00:00): Was sind das für CS-Kommentare? JEDER CS hat den gleichen, nichtssagenden Kommentar. Jeder andere bekommt eins auf die Mütze, wenn so sinnloses Zeugs drin steht.
holgerd (2016-12-14 09:29:48+00:00): Diese Changesets wurde mit dem Wheelmap-Editor gemacht: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wheelmap

Es sind aggrigierte Rollstuhlmarkierungen eines bestimmten Zeitraums.
Nakaner (2016-12-14 09:39:36+00:00): dooley, das Benutzerkonto wheelmap_visitor hat Bestandsschutz. Bitte akzeptiere das und informiere dich vorher durch Suchen im Forum, den Archiven der Mailinglisten und dem Wiki, bevor Du so laut polterst.
dooley (2016-12-14 14:14:58+00:00): "akzeptiere das", "informiere dich", "poltere nicht so laut"  sind für mich keine Grundlage für irgendwas. Hast du auch Argumente?

Schreib doch mal, worauf sich der angebliche Bestandsschutz gründet, wo das festgeschrieben ist und wer das so festgelegt hat?
geow (2016-12-14 20:29:47+00:00): +1, würde mich auch interessieren. Vor allem weil das meist mechanisch anmutende Edits sind.