piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:38:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:59:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:21:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:50:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:46:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:42:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
LucFreitas (2018-06-29 18:30:27+00:00): Boa tarde, Camila. As restrições de sentido são úteis para indicar manobras proibidas ou restritivas no trânsito de veículos. Obrigatoriamente cada relação de restrição deve ter, pelo menos, três elementos: um de onde o veículo vem, por onde o veículo passa e para onde o veículo vai/para onde é proibido ir. Veja essa página para aprender mais sobre as relações: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Relation:restriction
LucFreitas (2018-06-29 19:12:36+00:00): Estes trechos da rodovia já estão todos asfaltados ou estão para asfaltar? Por imagens de satélite desta semana a rodovia aparenta estar em obras de terraplanagem, além disso, não vi nenhuma notícia sobre a conclusão da pavimentação.
LucFreitas (2018-06-29 19:27:07+00:00): A estrada está completamente pavimentada como pode ser visualizado na camada DigitalGlobe Standart, mais atualizada nessa região.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:33:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:15:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
JochenOSM (2018-06-29 19:55:10+00:00): Sieht schon viel besser aus. Noch ein Tipp: Ich würde die Adresse an den POI (Restaurant usw.) taggen, oder an das Gebäude, aber nicht an den Punkt mit dem Eingang. Und das Modegeschäft neben der Krone ist doch geschlossen, oder?
DevioThules (2018-06-29 21:09:08+00:00): Mir wurde gesagt ich soll die Adresse an den Eingang taggen, damit man bei Navigation auch dort ankommt ^^ 
Habe ich es offen gelassen? Ich meinte momentan ist es geschlossen, ja
JochenOSM (2018-06-30 06:02:48+00:00): Adresse an den Eingang ist nicht falsch. Hat aber aus meiner Sicht Nachteile: 1) Bei Wohnhäusern wird oft kein Eingang eingezeichnet da es wichtigeres zu tun gibt. Ich betrete auch keine Privatgrundstücke nur um nachzuschauen wo der Eingang ist. Daher mache ich die Adresse dort ans Gebäude. 2) Bei POI ist es einfacher die Vollständigkeit zu prüfen wenn die Adresse am POI ist, daher mache ich die Adresse dort an den POI und platziere den dann im Gebäude in der Nähe des Eingangs. Wenn die Adresse nicht am POI sondern nur am Eingang ist kannst du zwar zur "Hauptstr. 1" navigieren bis zur Tür, aber nicht so gut zum POI. 3) Neueinsteiger vermuten die Adresse nicht am Eingang und erfassen sie dann ggf. nochmal für das Gebäude. 4) Zum Beispiel bei der Krone gibt es ja mehrere Eingänge, warum sollte mich die Navigation um das Gebäude herum zum Vordereingang schicken wenn der Eingang auf der anderen Seite auch für die Adresse und das Restaurant gilt? Du kannst ja mal schauen wie das in Aschaffenburg oder Frankfurt gemacht ist.
DevioThules (2018-06-30 10:13:12+00:00): Gut. Ich hab mal in Aburg nachgeschaut. Ich werde noch ein wenig was ändern. also die Adresse zu den Häusern hinzufügen, nicht zum Eingang.
Nur so: Es war nicht gemeint private Grundstücke zu betreten, damit man weiß wo der Eingang ist. Es ging drum wenn man den Eingang von außen sieht.
Ich werde die Adresse dann auch bei den Geschäften vermerken, dass man eben beides hat (so ist es in Aburg auch meist)
JochenOSM (2018-06-30 11:07:43+00:00): Schon klar, das mit den privaten Grundstücken sollte auch nur heißen dass nicht immer klar oder einfach zu ermitteln ist wo der Eingang ist, und das daher oft nicht so gemacht werden kann. In Miltenberg am Grauberg sieht man von der Strasse aus nicht mal das Haus geschweige denn den Eingang ;)
JochenOSM (2018-06-29 19:47:33+00:00): Ich bin zwar nicht so oft in der Krone und daher nicht ganz sicher was da dazu gehört, aber das sieht auf jeden Fall sehr gut aus, weiter so!
eggie (2018-06-29 20:01:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-06-29 20:02:50+00:00): Oke.. keurige edit.
eggie (2018-06-30 09:05:58+00:00): .. probeer svp wel concreet je edits te beschrijven. Dus highway=footway toegevoegd.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:13:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:39:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
adrianojbr (2018-06-30 16:04:29+00:00): qual o nome da empresa?
blubberblubb (2018-06-29 20:39:02+00:00): Note: This removal was a mistake (I confused the building with a nearby flat area). Corrected in changeset 60289204.
mueschel (2018-07-03 13:16:28+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag "lins = bay" on several power lines - could you check that?

Thanks, Jan
InfosReseaux (2018-07-04 21:27:04+00:00): Thank you to have noticed this !
It was an unfortunate typo.
A further changeset will move all those bogus ways to line=bay
Leo Slager (2018-07-06 21:32:06+00:00): Kunnen bussen vanaf Droogbak ook linksaf naar de busbaan Prins Hendrikkade? Die twee highways zijn nu niet verbonden !
Geofreund1 (2018-09-06 16:05:01+00:00): Kann es sein, dass die Hausnummern 60, 61, 76 und 82 Zur Dornermühle eigentlich den Straßennamen Hohenkrähenstraße tragen müssten? Jedenfalls wenn man Maps4BW trauen darf.
user_5359 (2018-06-30 05:15:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
Glassman (2018-06-29 23:06:52+00:00): Your edit looks great. Although I am curious why the road is blocked. I'll send you more information on OSM that might help you. If you have any questions, just ask.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60290497
koaladave (2018-06-29 23:12:16+00:00): My understanding is that when new development was planned; neighborhood preferred to restrict access.
Hjart (2018-06-30 16:03:34+00:00): Hvorfor ændrer du den så så den kun er til fodgængere?
atcomapper (2018-06-30 18:06:12+00:00): Såvidt jeg husker er det en fælles gang- og cykelsti, men er ikke helt sikker på hvordan den er skiltet. Skal forsøge at huske at tjekke næste gang jeg er der
Hjart (2018-06-30 18:48:34+00:00): Hajtænderne i den sydlige ende lader ane at stien primært er cykelsti
PT-53 (2018-07-06 06:38:51+00:00): Hallo schoka,
Du hast diese Linie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603522055 neu eingezeichnet, leider ohne die entspr. Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße
schoka (2018-07-08 11:50:17+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
Danke für den Hinweis. Ist erledigt.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:37:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:42:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:38:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:08:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:42:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Hjart (2018-07-01 06:01:59+00:00): Bemærk at brugere af kortet højst sandsynligt ikke vil bemærke beskrivelser etc der er anbragt på rettesættet, men ikke på de objekter der hentydes til.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:27:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:30:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
phidauex (2018-06-30 00:06:47+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Remember that you are editing the global live map, used by people all over the world for many purposes - adding the different areas over your home is likely to cause confusion. If you do want to map your home, please just trace the building using the tags "building=yes", things that aren't really there, or are tagged with personal information are best left off the public map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60291324
phidauex (2018-07-02 00:48:07+00:00): Hi, I removed your additions, since they don't correspond to any real objects. If you want to get back into mapping, take a look at these tips: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60291324
pitscheplatsch (2018-06-30 18:46:41+00:00): Hi ama929nda, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped ways? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60291357
phidauex (2018-06-30 00:03:40+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing! I cleaned up your parking aisle geometry a bit - take care to delete unneeded nodes and ways so your final map edit is as clean as possible.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60291381
Mike Raust (2020-10-02 11:22:04+00:00): Why have you removed several MT1/MT2 designations?
micha_k (2020-10-03 08:05:25+00:00): I don't remember the details of this change set. But usually, I moved the Track numbers to separate tag railway:track_ref, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_North_America
5m4u9 (2018-06-30 15:55:11+00:00): hi, thanks for update trunk roads. i suggest 'real' conection between f1, f2, f3, f19 routes, based on observation current traffic (and discussion with local people). 
//
f1 south (senkata) — 6 de marzo — juan pablo II avenue — f1 west (río seco junction, río seco aerialway station). f3 (norteast) — periférica/Juan jose torres — chacaltaya avenue — héroes del chaco — la ceja junction (union 6 de marzo + Juan Pablo II)...
//
i have some doubts union between chacaltaya - héroes del chaco avenues, because municipality recently inaugurated fertobeni bridge.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:31:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
JJIglesias (2018-06-30 00:52:04+00:00): Los valores de ancho de vias que estas colocando son todos incorrectos. El Mapa funciona en sistema metrico. Valores como 626.80 para el ancho de una via son irreales, si es en metros el valor deberia ser 6.268. 
Por favor modifica todos los valores que colocastes que estan erroneos y lee este wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-07-31 22:37:11+00:00): Não se gruda áreas com vias como fez aqui.
Supaplex (2019-02-07 15:07:58+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
oormilavinod (2018-07-06 04:23:32+00:00): Hey Michelle Bowers, during your edits there has bees a lot of roads that are misaligned and forming bad angles, i hope you will be more careful going forward. happy mapping 
have a great day
JJIglesias (2018-06-30 13:41:41+00:00): Hola tienes algun nombre u otra data para ese Albergue que agregastes?.
Hi, do you have any name or other complementary data for the Alpine Hut that you added?
Thanks

JJ
Nakaner (2018-07-05 10:53:45+00:00): Hi UtahBuildingsImport,

why did you delete existing buildings to replace them with new buildings?

I had a look on your import documentation but I was unable to find a link to the archives of the Imports mailing list. When did you sent the email to the Imports mailing list? (Please note that there is an Imports and an Imports-us mailing list and their are not the same)

Best regards

Michael
UtahBuildingsImport (2018-07-05 21:03:25+00:00): Hi Michael, great to hear from you again!

Please reference the Conflation plan section of the UtahBuildingsImport documentation to see why existing buildings may have been deleted: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Utah/UtahBuildingsImport#Conflation_Plan Each deleted building is individually reviewed by hand for footprint detail, placement, and tagging, and a judgement call is made on the best representation. Tagging is also merged between the two footprints. Conflicting tags are also reviewed for whichever is most specific and accurate. This is what was done in this case, where many of the existing house footprints only were tagged as "building=yes" and were simple rectangular polygons.

I posted to both Imports and Imports-us mailing lists. The email to the Imports list was sent on January 6. Here's a link: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2018-January/005333.html
I was not aware I had to include links to both emails in the documentation.

Best regards,
Jay
dooley (2018-07-11 10:25:09+00:00): Hallo neoLithos,

magst du die Adressen, die du mit diesem Änderungssatz hochgeladen hast, korrigieren? Die Adressen haben als Straßenname alle "<different>".

Danke.