piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-05-22 11:05:19+00:00): Dag Kurrid. Je maakt de huidige node los van de weg met toets G. Wel even controleren of daar dan de wegen nog aan elkaar zitten. Evt weer vastmaken met toets M (merge)  Dan sleep je het tankstation naar de adresnode en drukt op toets M. Klaar is Kees.
'k Zie nog wel steeds dat andere tankstation staat. Wellicht staat die tag wel op het vlak, want een node zie ik niet. (of het is de langzame rendering)
Up to you!
Gr Eggie
kurrid (2019-05-30 14:33:57+00:00): Het loskoppelen ging niet zoals ik verwachtte. Uiteindelijk maar gekopieerd en die toen gekoppeld aan het adres. Daarna de bestaande verwijderd. Daar zaten weer weggedeeltes aan. Beide wegen doorgetrokken en gekoppeld maar ik krijg bij het uploaden wel een waarschuwing waar ik even geen raad mee weet.
eggie (2019-05-30 14:44:48+00:00): Zal even kijken...
eggie (2019-05-30 14:57:39+00:00): Op twee plaatsen zaten de wegen niet vast.o.a. waar je het tankstation had losgemaakt. Bij fstned klopte de covered=yes niet. Die was te lang. Hoort van dakrand naar dakrand te lopen. En over het hele gebied had een andere mapper een gebied met highway=service gemapt met amenity=fuel. daarom zie je nu nog in de rendering nog een benzinestationsymbool. 
Dan kreeg je een foutmelding amenity fuel in amenity fuel. Ik heb dat grote vlak verwijderd.
JOSm validator laat nu geen fouten zien.
Gr eggie
aharvey (2019-05-21 02:36:49+00:00): Hi, what were you needing help with? It looks like you made some paths here, but then deleted them?
Carto'Cité (2019-06-02 10:03:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour cette précision sur l'étendue de la piste cyclable. Toutefois il manquait quelque chose d'important à ta contribution : connecter le début et la fin de la piste cyclable à la route. Ces connexions sont essentielles pour que les calculateurs d'itinéraires puissent prendre en compte la piste cyclable.
J'ai fait la correction. Bonne continuation !
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
Carto'Cité (2019-06-02 10:45:01+00:00): Autre point : tu as enlevé le tag highway=cycleway sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563366464, qui n'a plus que oneway=yes. J'ai corrigé :-)
Antoine.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 09:10:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70831091 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2825.
viloan (2019-05-20 13:05:55+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
bison166 (2019-05-21 08:33:18+00:00): Reithalle ist ein Gebäude, warum hast Du das entfernt
TourenbikerFKB (2019-05-21 09:06:22+00:00): und noch ein Hinweis auf die Benutzung des name-tags ("der Name ist nur der Name")

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names

Die falsche Verwendung findet man durchgängig bei deinen Eintragungen. Bitte korrigieren.
bison166 (2019-05-21 07:42:00+00:00): moin Knueppelhecht,
danke für Deine Beiträge in OSM.
Adress Knoten gehören auf das Gebäude.
Warum hast Du die Adresse auf die Straße gelegt ? Habe das rückgängig gemacht.
bison166 (2019-05-21 08:21:41+00:00): Vereinsname war doppelt.
geändert.
user_5359 (2019-05-20 14:11:51+00:00): Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6228764811 (if you want to mark a tree not a monument)!
tux67 (2019-09-10 15:30:49+00:00): Hi - auf einem von dir gemappten Weg wäre ein user der ggf. etwas mbt Hilfe bräuchte :-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74226482
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70441312
bison166 (2019-05-21 08:45:03+00:00): durch diese Änderung hast Du das 3D Modell des Golfsclub in OSM  zerstört. Vielen Dank.
Außerdem ist das Gebäude nicht winklig, was man in dem Editor mit einem Klick machen kann.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
bison166 (2019-05-21 12:06:57+00:00): Änderungssatz reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 09:10:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70831091 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2825.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 09:10:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70831091 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2825.
Vinber-Pro (2020-09-16 10:35:35+00:00): Bonjour Olga Mulot,
signalé par une note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2349725).
Tu as ajouté 2 informations qui semblent contradictoires sur l'Aqueduc https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6478104529#map=19/44.76275/-0.55601.

operator:type 	private
operator_type 	public

Qui a la gestion de cette ruine ?

à plus
viloan (2019-05-20 13:58:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Constable (2019-05-23 11:30:02+00:00): Hi Frank, I'm looking at your edit https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70442397 and would like to let you know that the Italian community agreed on placing address nodes near buildings instead of adding those tags to the building area. For that reason, the amendment you completed on this building ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72257932 ) should be reverted as you merged the old address node, which was placed exactly where the housenumber plate is (on the front door)
Also, are you sure about that post office in the swiming pool parking area?
Thanks!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-05-22 16:03:00+00:00): You deleted a part of a river here: 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70442555
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384245084
is it right?
smaprs (2019-05-22 20:11:34+00:00): Have you've seen you deleted the biggest part of the river?   
In OSM we don't just delete, we'd rather correct, so to preserve history.  
You should not just search by "landsat" old sources and delete the feature (BTW in the history of that you can see it was registered further improved with source:image=Bing 2015-12-02). See objects history before.    
There are 2 ways to correct preserving history in JOSM: "improve way" (shortcut: W); or draw a new way, select with the old, and do "replace" with Ctrl+Shift+G, so you preserve its history.  
  
See also:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:OSM_best_practice
smaprs (2019-06-14 23:45:55+00:00): Please read and answer comment about your editions.  
This is good practice in OSM.   
  
Also:   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map   
  
Also the comment at:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70528771
Buraddo (2019-05-20 14:08:30+00:00): Connected pathways from Parcul Poporului to streets
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-02-27 06:53:03+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274356645/history is not a hotel? Have you looked at website linked as one of tags?

Looks like website of a hotel, not an apartment building to me.
٠٠٠ (2020-02-27 14:05:01+00:00): You’re right, it is a hotel, my bad.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-02-28 15:37:48+00:00): In that case you really should fix your edit after discovering that it made data worse.

I now fixed this particular hotel - but please look over other changes made in this edit and any similar
Chris Fleming (2019-05-21 13:45:42+00:00): Just wondering what the reason fro the removal of the grass area in this changeset is?
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-05-21 21:16:05+00:00): It's actually farmland so I'll readd that later.
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:17:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570382 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm.  the related Note has been left intact.  if these are personal bookmarks, please reconfigure your maps.me not to upload them to the public map.
SomeoneElse (2019-05-20 14:50:13+00:00): Thanks for fixing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96156248#map=15/-34.9648/117.3660 .
Just asking on the off chance - you didn't get the chance to see whether https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96153399 was open all the way into town?  It was flooded when I was there (ages ago).
Ewen Hill (2019-05-20 22:09:42+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse, sorry, I used the road on the west of the river which now has a segregated bike lane next to the road for part of it to about the pub which I need to add.I disn't even see your path but I wasn't looking for it. Thanks for the note.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-20 17:14:32+00:00): Hey trav, can you let me know what you delete?   So I know where I went wrong?
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-20 17:26:32+00:00): Also how am I doing? better now?
cyclist789 (2025-05-05 10:44:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691239567
Are you sure about this being farmyard "Solvang"? Currently, it is merely a small park and a building used to support the nearby church and graveyard.
tux67 (2019-05-20 15:57:22+00:00): Hi, ich würde die Feld- und Waldgrenzen miteinander verbinden. Nur Wege sollte man nicht unbedingt mit Landuses auseinanderlegen. Und im südlichen Bereich des Waldgebietes gibt's ein paar Wege, die aufeinander zulaufen - sich aber nicht treffen. Muß das so? Gruß tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70444662
reigi (2019-05-20 18:05:17+00:00): kannst du mir bitte noch mitteilen, wie ich die Feld- und Waldgrenzen miteinander in JOSM verbinde? Meinst du die "Zechenring" Wege? Das sind tatsächlich Sackgassen.
tux67 (2019-05-20 19:07:29+00:00): Also die händische Methode wäre jeweils einen Node jeder Flächenlinie aufeinander zu legen zu und “m“ zu drücken. 
Bei dem Weg meinte ich diesen hier ...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/690473738#map=15/51.0776/6.1734
tux67 (2019-05-21 04:59:30+00:00): bis zu dem hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205634556#map=19/51.08156/6.18661
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70444662
reigi (2019-05-21 05:35:46+00:00): Danke für die Erklärungen und Hinweise. Alles berichtigt.
trial (2021-06-04 20:02:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544823055/history : je crois que tu as un problème avec la direction des lames de fond ;-)
trial (2023-08-15 09:58:09+00:00): Bonjour si le pattelage Ouest est vraiment "une voie verte", les relations cyclables devraient y passer et non passer par la route "principale" non ?.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 09:10:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70831091 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2825.
Alecs01 (2019-05-25 07:27:20+00:00): Hi, please pay attention when looking at aerial imagery, they may be misaligned, you moved the building upon a pedestrian area away from his correct position, I reverted the changeset.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 09:10:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70831091 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2825.
viloan (2019-05-20 15:21:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
TravGW (2019-05-20 20:35:43+00:00): Editing the map will NOT add pokégyms to Pokémon Go. There is a way to add gyms to the game but editing the map is not the way to do it.
viloan (2019-05-20 16:04:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Константин Гам (2019-05-20 23:10:07+00:00): Здесь нет организоаэванной стоянки, прекратите вносить бред в базу
zors1843 (2019-05-20 16:20:16+00:00): Please use the SPAW PICC background to map buildings.
Kind regards,
Georges
Hjart (2019-05-21 04:00:00+00:00): Are you sure about this? If this was really a thing there should be signs along the route, but I don' see any at e.g. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/hgOr69DBf8LJAEHbPFoPLQ
Also names of danish cycleroutes are usually in danish rather than german
osmviborg (2019-05-21 05:36:52+00:00): Fantasi.
osmviborg (2019-05-21 05:46:11+00:00): Det kan være denne her: http://udinaturen.dk/facilitet/Sydhavsruten/4198
Hjart (2019-05-21 06:27:33+00:00): #8 blev lavet om sidste år: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/20828
asandresen (2019-05-21 08:49:26+00:00): I actually dont know the name of the route. Just found the regional route signs named "R1" while following the national route 8 from Flensborg to Tonder which, as osmviborg mentioned, also exists. The part of the route that i draw nearly equals the national route 8 but includes some shortcuts. I dont have any picture of the signs to verify the existence. But it is marked in the cyclemap "Sydlige jylland" of nordisk korthandel. The only picture that i found in the internet that shows a part of the R1 route is here: https://www.scanmaps.dk/0251f59 (right picture)
Hjart (2019-05-21 09:06:01+00:00): When did you follow this route?

Please note that national route 8 was changed last year (see https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%98sters%C3%B8ruten ) and no longer goes through Tønder
asandresen (2019-05-21 09:08:52+00:00): In spring of last year. Didn't know that N8 was changed.
Hjart (2019-05-21 09:15:06+00:00): Ok. There were no cycle route signs at eg https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/sA1STU0j_Ga3v6e11U_BDQ 3 weeks ago, so I think we should revert this change.
asandresen (2019-05-21 09:28:04+00:00): One step back and there are signs. But I cant see the number on it. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=UhMuZ8OfcKhBwduzjqzvQQ&lat=54.86182259108507&lng=9.24098755162366&z=13.535077870279977&x=0.591378748012527&y=0.5178398098075407&zoom=1.6408386508659984
Hjart (2019-05-21 09:48:54+00:00): Those are typical local route signs. Also please use the third icon from the top right when sharing from Mapillary
Hjart (2019-05-21 09:57:22+00:00): Here's 2 slightly similar regional route signs from a few days ago (my own upload): https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SSmQTyfbZBAPAyXtbG2wzg
Hjart (2019-05-21 10:03:01+00:00): The national route signs look like the one in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rejsbydiget_ved_Horsb%C3%B8lvej_2.jpg
asandresen (2019-05-21 10:16:32+00:00): Ok. Cant verify that the route is still there. Maybe I'll find some time later this year to check if the signs are there or not.Thx for the help.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-09-06 14:04:04+00:00): não deve grudar áreas com vias como fez aqui área verde com rodovias, deixe separadas mesmo, facilita a manutenção do mapa.
4004 (2019-05-20 21:14:02+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
точка висит с апреля, но ждали пока откроется и поэтому теги кафе не вешали.
кофейня занимает не все здание, поэтому оставлю точкой
4004 (2019-05-20 21:15:22+00:00): а, ну и доступность на коляске уже висит на боковом входе
rivermont (2020-01-21 02:33:53+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for adding so many solar farms in NC!  
Are you sure that Bing is what you're tracing over? Most of these panels are misaligned from all imagery and are not even the correct size. In this area, Esri World Imagery is the nearest to 'truth' alignment as far as we can tell. Mapbox is also pretty good, but Bing is off by a bit and DG was always off. Check that things are lined up before added lots of things like solar panels.

Thank you,  
Will
user_6110846 (2019-05-20 18:31:06+00:00): Provide a rule based on which you deleted  tag "source: geometry" in school?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/50.273622087957825/28.64374757087445

надайте правило , на підставі котрого ти  стер " source:geometry "в школі?
user_6110846 (2019-05-20 19:00:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/45.2161/29.7075 
https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70448825?filters=%7B%22ids%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%2270448825%22%2C%22value%22%3A%2270448825%22%7D%5D%7D

Continuing the Wars of Editing by the KKS Mapper

.   I do not agree that you redraw the yellow lines from the public cadastre map
why you ignore that very often the yellow line of borders of cadastral zones differs from the privatization of land
The border needs to be drawn on the privatization of plots, it is a real mapping to which administrative territorial unit the territory belongs to and also shows in this case more precise borders
Продолжение войн редактирований картографом KKS 

1) Почему стираете полезный коментарий  к линии границы ?
не согласен что вы перерисовали желтые линии с публичной кадастровой  карты 
почему игнорируете что очень часто желтая  линия границ кадастровых зон отличаеться от  приватизации земельных участков 
Границу нужно рисовать по приватизации участков , она есть реальное отображение к какой административно территориальной единице принадлежжит территория а также показывает в дангом случае более точные границы
rivermont (2020-01-21 02:30:46+00:00): It is, actually. Please review tagging guidelines before altering random things that you are not familiar with.
marc__marc (2021-03-16 22:41:08+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4132722531/history
seeing that you add a translation of a generic name of a tree, I wonder if you really look at the objects or if you just import
Regards,
Marc
viloan (2019-05-20 17:04:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ma-rt-in (2019-05-20 21:29:17+00:00): Hallo,
dein Edit ist zum einen nur an einem kleinem Teil der Hafenstraße erfolgt und zudem nicht richtig, da der deutsche Name(name:de) bereits in name erfasst wurde.
Nur weil DU etwas nicht gefunden hast, musst du die Karte doch nicht gleich so verändern das es klappt.

Der Straßenabschnitt heißt nunmal St. Pauli Hafenstraße und nicht nur Hafenstraße.
vg
andreas klug (2019-05-20 22:03:37+00:00): klar, du hast fachlich völlig recht, keine frage. ich saß mit ner gruppe am beamer vorhin und bekam das einhellige feedback: "dann lieber google! eine karte, die 'hafenstraße, hamburg' nicht findet ist nicht alltagstauglich."
aber wie gesagt: mir war vorhin schon klar, dass meine änderung so nicht taugt - vielleicht liest ja jemand mit, der mit den osm-suchalgorithmen zu tun hat, *da* liegt ja der hund begraben.
vga
ma-rt-in (2019-05-21 07:40:47+00:00): Naja der oder die die meinen OSM wäre eine Karte die alltagstauglich sein sollte wissen nicht, das OSM lediglich eine Geo-Datenbank ist und sich verschiedene Nutzer nur der Daten bedienen.
Des Weiteren liest hier eigentlich keiner wirklich mit. Wenn du jedoch die Suchmaschiene für OSM.org verbessern möchte, schreibe hier ein ticket: https://github.com/openstreetmap/nominatim/issues
vg
Wulf4096 (2019-05-25 12:07:05+00:00): Hi,
wie wäre es mit alt_name oder short_name?
ma-rt-in (2019-05-25 12:57:34+00:00): short_name wäre da die bessere alternative
Kartenziegel (2019-05-21 11:01:30+00:00): Dear tshedy,

the world is not interested in hashtags but rather in meaningful changeset comments.

Best wishes