piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-09-21 08:53:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mappings as requested. 
In general. Your mappings are fair and squared. However, pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
* Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126410293
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 00:55:34+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5086664 ?

Is it really  a driveway?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mcliquid (2022-09-20 08:51:36+00:00): Thanks for the correction!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Lostmonkey (2023-04-27 13:28:00+00:00): Der er ingen bygning her. Var et rekonstrueret stenalderhus, der tilhørte museet. Men blev revnet ned for et par år siden.
osmviborg (2023-04-27 14:05:27+00:00): Synlig på forårsfoto 2021.
Lostmonkey (2023-04-27 15:10:41+00:00): Men som sagt siden revet ned. Så vel OK at slette? Jeg fjernede også den oprindelige bygning fra kortet, umiddelbart efter at have observeret nedrivningen. Men ved ikke lige hvordan jeg finder den historik frem for at se det præcise tidspunkt.
osmviborg (2023-04-28 07:28:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115672747
osmviborg (2023-04-28 08:21:59+00:00): Der burde måske rettes lidt her: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Moesgaard_Jernalderhus.jpg
ptarac (2022-09-24 18:41:24+00:00): Proszę uzupełnić informację o dostępności AED'a oraz czy znajduje się on w remizie np. na ścianie, czy jest na wyposażeniu wozu ratowniczo-gaśniczego. Dziękuję.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:48:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
ivanbranco (2022-09-21 13:20:09+00:00): Ciao Jens,

grazie per la modifica :)

surface=sterrato_e_pavimentato non va bene però, per convenzione i tag di OSM hanno una sintassi da seguire, tra cui l'inglese britannico per i tag e molti tipi di value, come in questo caso. Puoi trovare una lista dei possibili valori qua: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:surface

Buon mapping :)
JensHansen (2022-09-21 15:09:51+00:00): grazie ... probabilmente devo dividere la stradina, una è pavimentata, l'altra è sterrato ...
ivanbranco (2022-09-21 15:17:18+00:00): Per dividere la strada puoi selezionare il nodo in cui la pavimentazione cambia e cliccare "X" sulla tastiera.
JensHansen (2022-09-21 15:22:54+00:00): Grazie ... ora me lo scrivo. Questo pezzo è proprio un primo esercizio ... ho cancellato e ridisegnato. La prossima volta saprò fare meglio con la x
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
rhtb0 (2022-09-20 12:04:22+00:00): 안녕하세요
착공예정 이란 것은 충청권 광역철도 인것 같습니다만
아직 개통되지 않거나, 계획에만 있으면 지도에 표현할 방법이 적습니다.
rhtb0 (2022-09-20 12:07:42+00:00): 역명에 ○○역 이름 기입은 금지되어 있습니다.
또한 아직 개통하지 않는 역은 그냥 기차역 태그가 아니라 proposed=station 태그를 넣어주세요.
관계 설정은 아직 하면 안됩니다.
railway=station(기차역, 지하철역) 건물 태그는 사용하지 않고 building=train_station 태그를 사용합니다.
rhtb0 (2022-09-20 12:08:49+00:00): 역은 railway=proposed, proposed=station 을 넣어주세요.
rhtb0 (2022-09-20 12:09:32+00:00): 그냥 기차역 태그를 하시면 이미 개통된 역으로 보입니다.
대전맨 (2022-09-20 23:47:08+00:00): 메모해두겠습니다
rhtb0 (2022-09-21 07:15:44+00:00): Proposed(제안)는 착공 전이나 계획에 있는 것에만 태그합니다. 지도에 표시되지는 않지만 데이터는 유효합니다. 
착공 후 공사중이라면 construction 태그를 넣어주세요. 역은 construction=station과 railway=construction 입니다.
충청권 광역철도는 수도권 1호선 처럼 기존 경부선과 호남선 선로를 그대로 사용하니 역 태그, 관계 설정(관계는 개통 후 설정합니다.) 승강장, 정차 위치만 개통 후 추가해야 합니다. 기차가 아니라 전철(지하철) 노선입니다.
개통 후 정차역 점이 기차가 같이 정자하면 train=yes와 subway=yes를 넣고 단독 정차역이면 subway만 넣어주세요.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
CoyKoi (2022-09-20 10:20:21+00:00): I don't know how all the nodes ended up with a source=esri tag. I will try fix this now.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126411726
CoyKoi (2022-09-20 10:43:32+00:00): Fixed with CS# 126416056
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
habi (2022-09-20 10:18:54+00:00): Im sad that the shop is not called Schrödingers barbershop ;)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
user_5359 (2022-09-24 06:08:50+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir nochmal http://www.osm.org/way/1096223365 (eins von zwei Objekten). Was ist die Bedeutung vom Tag Hesse = DOP20;Katasterkarte. Meinst Du eventuell den Schlüssel source?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
ivanbranco (2022-09-21 13:38:12+00:00): Ciao Fabrizio,

benvenuto su OSM!

Ho solo un dubbio, davvero c'è una fontana ornamentale decorativa in mezzo al bosco? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10038847866

O volevi forse indicare una sorgente?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-09-20 08:44:31+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 126401979, 126402020.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-22 10:53:00+00:00): Thank you very much
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-22 13:02:46+00:00): Hello,
You've also changed the names here - can you explain that as well?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-09-22 13:03:02+00:00): 你好，
您還在這裡更改了名稱-您也可以解釋一下嗎？
此致，
安迪
HKHikerhang (2022-09-22 15:01:54+00:00): The previous change was just the user’s self-interpretation. There is no official or commonly known name for this peak
HKHikerhang (2022-09-22 15:03:06+00:00): Th location change of high point was referred from HK Gov’t map
SomeoneElse (2022-09-22 13:03:55+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain why you deleted the English name here?  Was it invalid in some way?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-09-22 13:04:07+00:00): 你好，
你能解釋一下為什麼你在這裡刪除了英文名嗎？ 它在某種程度上是無效的嗎？
此致，
安迪
HKHikerhang (2022-09-22 15:04:24+00:00): There is no English name for this peak. The name added by that user was just self-interpretation
Kovoschiz (2022-09-28 08:10:17+00:00): Looks like transliteration.
maraf24 (2022-11-25 23:18:58+00:00): Zakaz wjazdu, czyli znak B-2, to tag vehicle=no lub vehicle=private.
Zaś access=private blokuje ruch pieszych, który tutaj jest wszędzie dozwolony.
user_8655426 (2022-09-20 09:25:19+00:00): こんにちは。
短期間で広範囲にわたり大量の林道を編集されていますが、林道の名称および区間はどのように調べたのでしょうか？ 変更セットに source=* がありません。道路の種別を変更しないなど、編集内容も不自然です。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/きたきつね/history
https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?%E3%81%8D%E3%81%9F%E3%81%8D%E3%81%A4%E3%81%AD

以前も何度か指摘しましたが、情報源として利用できないデータをOSMにコピーしている疑いがあります。
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764

これまでの林道の編集のもととなった情報源を教えてください。現地調査をしたのであれば、その方法をこの変更セットで説明してください。よろしくお願いします。
txemt (2022-09-27 20:50:35+00:00): https://app.slack.com/client/T029HV94T/CB7NU9007
thopf (2022-09-20 10:06:47+00:00): Hallo!
Das Ganze ist noch nicht vom Gemeinderat beschlossen. Es gibt noch, wegen des administrativen Aufwands, zahlreiche Gegenstimmen. Ich hätte mit dem Changeset bis zum Gemeinderatsbeschluss gewartet.
LG.
Sebi506 (2022-09-20 10:30:35+00:00): Du hast recht, ich habe da den Artikel in der heutigen Kleinen Zeitung falsch verstanden, habe "nach einem Gemeinderatsbeschluss" als letzten statt kommenden Donnerstag gelesen. Prinzipiell sollte es aber mit den Stimmen der Koalition allein schon beschlossen werden können, die Neos waren in der Vergangenheit auch für Umbenennungen also kann ich mir auch ihre Zustimmung vorstellen. Was meinst du, soll ich es wieder zurückändern?
thopf (2022-09-20 10:38:34+00:00): Nein! Einfach mit dem neuen Namen belassen, und die tags old_name  und so etwas wie "start_date:name" hinzufügen. Für den unwahrscheinlicheren Fall dass die Umbenennung nicht zu Stande kommt, kann man dann wieder zurückändern.
Sebi506 (2022-09-20 10:51:34+00:00): Danke, hab ich gemacht. 😄
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Cy R (2022-09-20 15:00:31+00:00): Hello, can you please elaborate on the reason for this change? As far as I can see, the original road configuration was correct. 

NE 113th St is signed as "right turn only" both east and west of this intersection, and northbound traffic from Northgate Way and Lake City Way must not turn left onto that road. The segment added to connect this road across the intersection does not reflect these restrictions.

This changeset also removes a segment of the Lake City Way dual carriageway that enables southbound traffic to continue through to the road south of the intersection. With this change, southbound traffic will only be able to turn right onto Northgate Way.

This changeset adds a new traffic signal that does not exist on the ground. The west junction of NE 113th St and Lake City Way is controlled by a stop sign, and there is no signal for traffic turning right from Lake City Way onto Northgate Way.

I can fix these issues, but I'd like to understand the goal of these changes before reverting anything.

Thanks!
kmarkish_lyft (2022-09-21 09:04:18+00:00): Hello, Cy R!
My name is Kate, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. You’re absolutely right, this is an incorrect changeset. These changes were intended to allow making an u-turn from  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332175734/history to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297245296/history. But I have missed that it's illegal because of barrier and solid lane. I’ve already reverted edits in the changeset - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126450938. Thank you so much for noticing it. I’m really sorry for my mistakes and any inconvenience these changes may have caused. 
Best regards, Kate
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-20 22:30:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126441133 where the changeset comment is: restore information that was deleted by the UNMISS GIS account, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6390