piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kartler175 (2020-07-15 08:26:38+00:00): … and thereby corrupted boundary relation http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-121.78687&lat=49.19231&zoom=14&opacity=1.00
DENelson83 (2020-07-15 08:59:27+00:00): And fixed it with changeset 88020779.  Thanks for tipping me off to this.
dudka (2020-07-25 16:36:20+00:00): не треба копіювати помилки з вікіпедії
1gorok (2020-07-25 17:30:12+00:00): Вітаю. Згідно кадастрових даних, в тому числі кадастрових номерів ділянок, дана територія належить до села Зелене. Координати точки, які вказані у вікіпедії можуть бути досить неточними, оскільки дані імпортувалися з інших неперевірених джерел. Присілок Шибене і є селом Явірник. Адмін OSM переніс точку населеного пункту назад.
RZR-UA (2020-07-25 18:43:29+00:00): Соглашусь с вами, спасибо за указание на ошибку. Анализ кадастровых данных (КОАТУУ) показал, что так и есть, вы абсолютно правы.

Интересно, что ошибка не только в википедии, а также в викимапии, гугл-картах, яндекс-картах, старом генштабе и даже в Оглядовой карте Кадастра...

Когда вносил правки, старался проверить в нескольких источниках.
1gorok (2020-07-26 11:31:28+00:00): Так, я теж довго розбирався в цьому питанні, шукав правди всюди. Також написав в чат спільноти в телеграмі. Адміністратор спільноти приєднався до пошуку правди. На жаль, гірські села погано замаплені на всіх картах. Гляньте ті ж Гугл карти з супутниковим шаром, і забийте в пошуку назву якогось гірського села, Зелене, чи той же Явірник, Голови чи інші. Вам пошук видасть полігон кордонів населеного пункту, який не обіймає весь населений пункт, а лише якусь частину. Тобто більшість села може бути "нічийна". Помилки копіювали одні в одних. Так, в моєму містечку є вулиця Люкляна. Це місцевий художник. Але хтось неправильно написав в Візікомі, а карти Гугл і собі у них скопіювали. Але як місцевий житель точно знаю як називається вулиця, бо і фото табличок маю, і файл генплану населеного пункту.
 Іноді точки населених пунктів знаходяться за межами самого населеного пункту. Це проблема є і на Гугл картах, і на наших openstreetmaps. Бо і у нас і у них був імпорт даних з полігонами населених пунктів чи то в 2008 році, чи 2012, точно не пам'ятаю. Мені про це пояснювали в спільноті. І ці дані дуже приблизні. Те ж саме на візікомі. Гляньте де знаходиться у них село Зелене. Да, там де присілок Шибене. Тому - керуватися даними інших картографічних сервісів не можна. Бо у них також дуууууже багато помилок. Єдине, на що ми можемо посилатися при редагуванні карти, це дані кадастру. Хоча і у них спостерігаються неточності. Але вони мінімальні, і як правило виправляються з часом. В тім, стосовно Явірника, Шибеного і Зеленого ще вияснятиму у місцевих жителів, якщо вдасться додзвонитися до адміністрацій. Але посилатися на вікіпедію, це точно не варіант. Бо і її пишуть люди, які теж помиляються.
Успіхів. Всього доброго.
DD1GJ (2020-07-14 18:59:33+00:00): Revert 87966527 87966261 87965911 87965851

Hallo 1068hgh,
hier ist keine Sspielwiese. Du hattest Echtdaten eines weltweiten Projektes gelöscht!
ma-rt-in (2020-07-15 07:36:38+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier eine vorrübergehenede 30er Beschränlung eingebaut, nur leider glaube ich nicht so recht, das diese Beschränkung nicht in den Schulferien gelten soll? In der Regel sind die durchgehend.
vg
muralito (2020-07-14 12:48:13+00:00): Hi. I disagree with this changeset. The island shouldnt have inner member.
Baraboo1 (2020-07-14 18:45:13+00:00): Hi muralito, thanks for reaching out. Can you explain why you disagree with this change? It seems like the water feature within this island should not display as a wetland.
muralito (2020-07-14 19:13:37+00:00): Because the water feature *IS* part of the island, which is not the case in OSM if you map as inner member.

You mention "display", so if you are interested in fix the rendering, you will need to map separate elements for the island and for the wetland.
Baraboo1 (2020-07-15 17:44:54+00:00): Thanks for getting back so quickly. This definitely makes sense and I appreciate you explaining your reasoning. I have altered the modeling in this way so the island is a complete feature and the wetland is a separate feature with the water as an inner member.
muralito (2020-07-16 15:17:21+00:00): Thank you for understanding the issue and fixing it.
ToniE (2020-07-14 09:35:22+00:00): Hi,

"private property"?

then: "access" = "private" should be used and that's all, no bicycle = foot = horse = ... = no

BR
Toni
Frans S (2020-07-21 17:14:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Iyan (2020-07-21 02:43:44+00:00): Hello, it looks like the highway=livingstreet that you created is a duplication of already mapped street next to it. In the mapillary, the left side of the street is buildings while it should be river. The initial part of the added highway also simply fly on top of buildings if we are looking at the imagery.
Yosemitey (2020-07-21 20:05:00+00:00): Hello Iyan. Thank you for pointing out this classification issue. I changed this way from an existing residential way that paralleled the other road ways. I thought it was best to downgrade its classification but now I realize it would have been better to remove this way completely, as it is a duplicate road as you say and should not be on the map. Thank you for your verification. I will go back and delete it and in the future I will be on the look out for similar duplicate ways in the data.
Best regards,
Yosemitey
Iyan (2020-07-23 02:56:32+00:00): Hello, Yosemitey, much appreciated for your prompt response and for the changes. I hope you stay safe and healthy.
Colin Smale (2020-07-14 13:04:17+00:00): Which relations exactly did you remove from Dover district? They may have been legitimate subareas. What were they "duplicating"?
user_177389 (2020-07-14 15:40:32+00:00): I removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1598872 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1598873 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1598874 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1598875
They duplicate some of the more suitable subareas with admin_level=10. Ideally administrative boundaries have administrative subareas (1) which as a whole is equal to the area of the parent relation (2).

(1) If you filter administrative boundaries, you don't want to have any other boundaries (for statistical analysis).

(2) I think that's more important.
Colin Smale (2020-07-14 15:53:45+00:00): OK I see. They may be coterminous with the civil parishes (admin_level=10) but they are different objects, which also have a legal "subarea" relationship to the same parent. It's not about "suitability" (which sounds a bit subjective) but a matter of a defined relationship. I think you have misunderstood the UK system...
ACarlotti (2020-07-16 01:47:17+00:00): You seem to have mistakenly added a node to the residential area boundary. This probably shouldn't be sharing any nodes with the track you added.
kartler175 (2020-07-15 08:13:43+00:00): … and thereby corrupted adminstrative boundary http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-71.27924&lat=46.70418&zoom=14&opacity=1.00 by modifying way http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=40243391
arcanma (2020-07-14 12:06:28+00:00): Benvenuto in OpenStreetMap.
Ti ricordo che le modifiche effettuate sono inserite nella mappa senza alcuna verifica, quindi il punto da te inserito per prova è visibile da tutti. Per cortesia esegui anche una prova di cancellazione e rimuovilo.
Puoi inserire moltissimi oggetti reali che ancora non sono presentì, così arricchisci la mappa, vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Glossario_OSM
Cascafico (2020-07-14 14:05:10+00:00): Una stazione della funivia qui?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87971775
user_6631989 (2020-07-14 15:56:29+00:00): Si, private ed all'aperto
mnitrmnitr (2023-05-13 19:47:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3604499
tastrax (2020-09-09 00:31:05+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
abakus_uploader (2020-07-14 22:30:56+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Mordechai23 (2020-07-15 09:10:22+00:00): poprawione
Fijord (2023-09-24 13:15:10+00:00): Thank you very much for recording the hiking trail. We were able to cross the lake and have a wonderful trekking tour.
azakh-world (2020-07-15 21:25:03+00:00): Hello.
"railway=station+station=subway" is the main and mandatory object at a subway station. Also, stop_positions and the station (also subway_entrances and platforms if mapped) should be combined into a stop_area relation. Please look how it's made at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7703349
The validation page helps you: http://osm-subway.maps.me/japan.html

Best regards,
Alexey
4004 (2020-07-15 23:13:43+00:00): здравствуйте, по этому адресу можно придти и купить технику?
если нет, то нужен тег офис.
применимо и к другим вашим правкам
theophrastos (2020-07-15 04:50:47+00:00): Ist die Breite des Feldweg wirklich 0?
eggie (2020-07-14 12:49:07+00:00): Dag M van Hevelingen. Je bedoeling is uiteraard goed, maar er is hier sprake van een spoorviaduct.. dus wordt er niet nog een keer een tunnel getagd op het weggedeelte.
Verder alleen het gedeelte onder het viaduct taggen

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-14 13:01:41+00:00): De tunnel heb ik verwijderd.  
cuting=yes daar voor in de plaats.
access=yes hoeft niet op regulieren wegen.
motor_vehicle=yes idem.. 
Volgens het ontwerpplan is de doorrijhoogte 
3.6  ?
Is dat later aangepast.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-14 13:04:05+00:00): typo cutting=yes.. bovenstaande aangepast
MvanHevelingen (2020-07-14 13:16:23+00:00): Top dank je wel Eggie!!

Klopt, werkelijke hoogte is anders op papier. Dit de projectleider aan ons (team verkeer) doorgegeven.
In heel dit gebied langs het spoor en het station komen nog diverse wijzigingen.
eggie (2020-07-14 13:33:23+00:00): Oke... De door jou ingegeven maten staan er uiteraard nog op.
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2020-07-15 00:24:25+00:00): Hi fredi_alf,
Here you can see what a mess you made of this landuse sand:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.98687&lat=52.32274&zoom=18&opacity=0.79
Please do not use Vespucci in The Netherlands. removing duplicates with V is not a succes !
azakh-world (2020-07-15 07:17:46+00:00): HI.
Please look at coastlines around the way 23808543. After your alignment of way 23808980 the lines got intersected. I suppose such error can occur if one moves features without downloading surrounding objects. Please be careful since valid coastline is crucial piece of map data.
azakh-world (2020-07-15 07:30:13+00:00): Here is a screenshot: https://www.dropbox.com/s/fuy976y7glsb6fe/Coastline_changeset-87977812.png?dl=0
KorvatunturiFell (2020-07-16 18:29:51+00:00): Thanks for notifying me of this issue, it looks like another mapper has fixed the problem here.
literan (2020-07-14 16:07:41+00:00): неправильно пишете opening hours (надо на английском - все теги на английском), посмотрите как в других POI пишется. Также некорректный формат номера дома (просто копируйте с самих домов). Здесь исправлю, а дальше буду просто вычищать.
Haris IRM-ED (2021-06-22 07:14:51+00:00): Hello IleDeLaTortue
Is there any recomendation from you so this way is not crossing with waterbody? 

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/826161814
Haris IRM-ED (2021-06-22 07:21:23+00:00): Hello IleDeLaTortue
Existe alguma recomendação sua para que esse caminho não seja cruzando com corpo d'água?

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/826161814
IleDeLaTortue (2021-06-23 00:04:22+00:00): Hello Haris IRM-ED. This reservoir feature has not been updated since 2017. The shoreline has likely regressed due to drought. I would suggest reaching out to the Brazil local who created it or other locals in the area to make sure. Best.
Haris IRM-ED (2021-06-23 02:06:29+00:00): Thank you for your response, and thanks for the suggestion. I should discuss with local mapper that draw the waterbody too.
berndw (2020-07-15 06:57:27+00:00): Hallo

das bedeutet aber nicht das Fussgänger explizit erlaubt sind
Ich würde das foot=yes entfernen, eventuell um eine gute description erweitert

Bernd
berndw (2020-07-15 07:24:21+00:00): Habe ich gemacht, keine Ahnung warum ich das damals gesetzt habe, wahrscheinlich vererbt von den eigentlichen Anschlüssen zur B9
user_2066394 (2020-07-14 14:04:46+00:00): gebäudedurchfahrt klingt aber eher nach ebenerdiger zufahrt? tunnel=building_passage ggf. zweckmäßiger? oder fährt man da wirklich kurz unter die erde?
Meskalin (2020-07-17 08:49:19+00:00): hi Wurzelast,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
Hatte noch nie vorher auf die Tunneltypen geachtet...
Schon geändert :)
4004 (2020-07-15 23:17:29+00:00): здравствуйте, такие часы работы (словами, на русском) не поймет ни одна программа на данных осм
user_11498075 (2020-07-28 13:58:30+00:00): Hi there is no median to give link and that classification for that link also wrong it should be primary link  if there is  median.Please check and do correction.
VLD116 (2020-07-30 06:28:41+00:00): Hi Ruthik Dhoni,

Thank you for bringing to our notice! 
I have fixed the link Thank you :) 

Regards
Regu
eggie (2020-07-14 13:21:44+00:00): Dag John... Lijkt me aardig gelukt zo.
Gr eggie
JohnVanA (2020-07-15 20:48:24+00:00): Ik hoopte al dat je dat zou zeggen. Voorlopig blijf ik nog wat kleinigheden toevoegen in de wijk.
John.
Frans S (2020-07-20 12:07:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
The majority of your mappings is inaccurate mapped and not squared.
I Invalidate this task. Please correct your mappings
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
daniel_solow (2020-07-24 13:36:42+00:00): Hi Tyler,

I ran some validations by Forest Park and noticed the way (656242493) in this changeset. Did intent to include more information about this area? I was going to delete it but since you are an active NYC mapper, could you explain what you were planning to do here?
user_385682 (2020-07-25 00:20:44+00:00): Hi Daniel

Yes, I did neglect that. 

71st Avenue / Continental Avenue in Forest Hills is complex.  It is really just 71st Avenue from a street numbering system developed 100 years ago. But the uber wealthy landowners from a portion of it removed all traces on the numbered street and sign it as Continental Avenue. Because class.

I was born near here and everyone says 71st Continental like one word, 

So I was struggling with "Do I use the signs or do I indicate the whole stretch as 71st Continental as everyone says?"

If you were to ask directions to this street either name would work.  I'm leaning to indicating this whole stretch as 71st Continental regardless of signage because that's what locals call it. 

Comments welcome.
user_385682 (2020-07-25 13:14:37+00:00): Sorry, wrong element disregard my previous.  The way 656242493 you mentioned was already in place. I began to delete it but it's connected to dozens of nodes. Please continue to delete
eggie (2020-07-14 13:26:39+00:00): Dag Rienk... Bedoel je wellicht amenity=post_box  ?
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpost_box

en 

amenity=letter_box - Private mailboxes where mailmen or other people deposit letters to specific addresses.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-14 13:38:54+00:00): Aangepast naar post_box
xinfy (2021-04-09 16:37:54+00:00): should be 'Khogaya Dost'
user_2066394 (2020-07-14 14:20:19+00:00): das Ernst-Mach-Gymnasium ist jetzt dreimal eingetragen: auf dem multipolygon, auf dem nördlichen gebäudeteil und auf dem von dir neu eingetragenen node. bei neueintragungen immer auch mehrfacheintragungen prüfen und ggf. bereinigen
drlellinger (2020-07-14 14:41:48+00:00): danke für den Hinweis, wurde korrigiert
Frans S (2020-07-29 11:50:09+00:00): Hello Annelene
Thanks for mapping her
A remark. Most buildings are fair rectangular
Please try to map and square them accordingly.
See my PM as well
SomeoneElse (2020-09-18 21:22:40+00:00): In this changeset you've connected https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/826180221 to the middle of a ditch, which clearly makes no sense.  Please keep an eye open for what you are connecting to what.
eggie (2020-07-14 14:13:31+00:00): Dag Rienk.. Je hebt een voetpad en een trap ingetekend over een door mij eerder ingetekend pad en trap. 
Dat gaat niet werken. Halverwege zie ik een oversteekplaats.. crossing Die hoort daar denk ik niet.
Het traject van mijn pad heb ik ingetekend mbv de BGT omtrekgericht achtergrond.
Zou je ook niet te veel edits in één changesets kunnen toevoegen. Bij een revert ben je alles weer kwijt.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-07-14 14:27:05+00:00): Bij het toevoegen van parkeerplaatsen zul je een keuze moeten maken . Of op een node... of op een vlak. Het hoeft niet dubbel. (Golfbaan)
Kijk je nog even?
Het pad naar de brug zal ik aanpassen en mijn pad verwijderen. Twee is iets te veel :)
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-07-14 14:39:28+00:00): Je edits  ter oriëntatie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87981466
hoserab (2020-07-14 17:14:04+00:00): Hi Ido Marom. With this changeset you have deleted several parking aisles and replaced them with a new "building" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/826183208) at 12th Ave & Macleod Tr SE. This "building" was merely a temporary tent that was set up on the site for about four weeks last summer. The tent no longer exists; the parking lot is still extant. Can you please revert these changes and put it back to the way you found it? Thanks in advance
hoserab (2020-07-20 16:44:23+00:00): I have deleted the "building" and restored the parking aisles myself.

Please be more careful in future about simply tracing from satellite imagery.
Mordechai23 (2020-07-14 13:59:46+00:00): W tym: osiedle szeregówek na Różanej, Kwiatowej i domki na Lawendowej
user_5359 (2020-07-14 17:26:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node. and how is your comment to be understood?
flohoff (2020-07-14 18:10:04+00:00): Moin,
guck dir nochmal die access tags hier auf den Wegen an.

Mal davon abgesehen das bei einem access=destination ein bicycle=destination mit drin ist und damit unnötig wundere ich mich wie man "bicycle=destination" beschildern kann.

Wir taggen ja access restrictions nicht nach Gefühl sondern nach tatsächlicher Beschilderung.

Deshalb interessiert mich mal wie hier das ganze Beschildert ist.

Flo
Frans S (2020-07-20 15:05:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.
airon90 (2021-03-26 15:13:15+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro che abbia chiuso? Da Facebook sembra che sia solamente chiuso per via dei DPCM ma che lavorino ancora. Attendo una tua risposta prima di procedere con il rollback. Buona giornata! ^^
Alecs01 (2021-03-26 16:15:01+00:00): Ciao, era indicato in questa nota (precedente al Covid) https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2094036 se sei sicuro che sia ancora aperto, modificalo pure.
UT93 (2021-02-22 19:10:14+00:00): Ich weiss nicht so genau, ob es schlau war, dem Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241085698 das "Building-Attribut" zu entfernen. Daraus resultiert nämlich, dass es jetzt von der Karte verschwunden ist. Was ich persönlich nicht passend finde, zumal das Gebäude ja nach wie vor vollständig erhalten und vom Zustand einer Ruine noch ein paar Hundert Jahre entfernt ist...
Adamant1 (2020-07-22 21:14:27+00:00): Hello. I'm wondering why you re-adjusted this retail area after I recently changed it. I had added shopping center node in the middle of the shopping center and the area didn't really need be cut back so it didn't cover the other place south east. Plus, the area between Freeman Lane and the freeway isn't part of Pine Creek Shopping Center as far as I know like you have it now.