piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bielebog (2018-08-16 09:44:58+00:00): Das Haus Bahneinschnitt 14 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/610620348 steht nicht mehr und war deswegen schon gelöscht. Man beachte auch das umliegende Polygon :)
myxor (2018-08-16 10:14:38+00:00): Oh das tut mir leid, das habe ich übersehen :)
OSchlüter (2018-07-25 18:45:57+00:00): Die Straße herißt Schierenhöh ohne e am Ende
Steht so auf den Straßenschildern und die
Karte des Amtes, der PLZ-Server haben es
so. Nur der Veranstalter  des Headbanger Open Air hat in seinen Impressum beide Versionen
ToniE (2018-07-25 20:21:59+00:00): Hello,

you've tagged the boundary from a "Kreisfreie Stadt München" (admin_level=6) to a normal 'city' (admin_level08).

admin_level=6 was set by intention and set as such for many years and reflects the "Kreisfreis Stadt" status, such as many other cities in Germany.

You're change had many consequeces for automated quality assurance tools which rely on propper settings of the admin_level.

I will revert your change.

However, if you like to discuss your changes, please use the german mailing list "[Talk-De]"or the german part of the OSM forum forum.openstreetmap.org.

For the time being, I suggest to keep the ols status of admin_level=6 and wait for the result of the discussions.

Thanks
Toni
ZLima12 (2022-03-27 02:09:57+00:00): Just letting you know, you somehow created a new relation for I-865 in this changeset that only had one node in it. I'm deleting it now.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-25 16:39:35+00:00): Hi gabd000, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped airports? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61035714
gabd000 (2018-07-25 16:42:19+00:00): This is fake airport or closed airport.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-25 16:51:21+00:00): Are you sure? All three airports are visible in the satellite imagery...
gabd000 (2018-07-25 22:00:31+00:00): Yes, i am sure.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-26 13:41:33+00:00): But you are not a local contributor, correct?
maraf24 (2018-07-30 19:49:18+00:00): Radlin 182/2 jest tutaj - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422515289
Czy ośrodek jest w tym miejscu, czy też jest tu, gdzie został dodany, ale adres ma inny?
aharvey (2018-07-27 03:18:46+00:00): I extended the name correction further west based on Mapillary (best to always use street level imagery if you can as the LPI Basemap does have some typos)
voschix (2026-04-09 16:53:29+00:00): Hi Arlas. I know that you have given up on mapping in Sicily. Would like to bring this old changeset of yours to your attention. It looks that your edits are all shifted by a fixed amount with respect to the latest Bing maps (which coincide well with Strava Global Heatmap data). Unfortunately your changeset comment does not give your sources. As it look like a systematic shift maybe we can keep the data and only shift them. What do you think?
Volker from Padua.
viloan (2018-07-24 20:57:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ma-rt-in (2018-07-31 12:34:38+00:00): Hallo,
wo genau ist die Abladestelle oder ist es das ganze Feld?
Zudem nicht landuse=landfill nutzen sondern eher amenity=recycling!
vg
عبد القادر الجزائري (2018-10-26 11:27:41+00:00): Vandalism report #10: Change of name:ar, name:en, and name:fr with neither explanation nor source
Tamazight2001 (2018-10-26 11:59:33+00:00): That place is called At Dwala by its inhabitants and the name should be At Dwala in all languages. No need and wrong to arabize it.
Tamazight2001 (2018-10-26 12:18:27+00:00): Take as an example "New York". It doesn´t become "Nouveau York" in French, or "York el Djadida" in arabic. It called  NEW YORK in all other languages, without any changes. The same applies to "At Dwala", it's the autochton name used by its inhabitants and it does NOT change in any other language.
عبد القادر الجزائري (2018-10-26 12:26:53+00:00): Then please provide sources for your change. The governmental sources say "Beni Douala" for the name in the Latin Script and "بني دوالة" in the Arabic script. This is also the name found on traffic signs. If you want to add the local pronounciation, OSM provides three extra tags for your purpose: loc_name (local name), reg_name (regional name) and alt_name (alternative name). Please use those tags as described in the official OSM wiki. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name)
عبد القادر الجزائري (2018-10-26 12:34:28+00:00): And no, New York is not called New York in every language. For example in Spanish New York is called "Nueva York" and in Portuguese "Nova Iorque".
Tamazight2001 (2018-10-26 13:25:10+00:00): New York is called New York in the languages that we are dealing with here (English, French, arabic) and the exception only confirms the rule that the overwhelming majority of toponyms don't change their name from a language to another.
As for your other comment concerning governmental sources, if they still are under colonial influence and use colonial names, that´s their business. What counts is that the autochtons call their place At Dwala. Pay them a visit to confirm.
woodpeck (2018-11-04 10:51:39+00:00): If the local people have the power to set their own names then I am sure they will have put up road signs or village name signs, and then I would ask you to submit photos to prove it. Otherwise, please put the name used by the colonial-influenced government in "name" and the local name in "loc_name".
Tamazight2001 (2018-11-06 10:27:03+00:00): Yes, the local people have indeed put up name signs. They also paint in black the colonialists signs to conceal them.
I think that for naming we should be on the side of the local people and not the illegitimate central government dictatorship.  
How would you like me to send you a photo with a sign put up by the locals showing At Dwala?
Tamazight2001 (2018-11-06 10:39:25+00:00): In addition to me sending you a photo, you can confirm this name in wikipedia:
https://kab.wikipedia.org/wiki/At_Dwala
woodpeck (2018-11-06 10:40:28+00:00): Let's not get carried away with politics. We tend to favour local customs over centralist ideas, however a balance needs to be struck - I am sure that there would be also local groups wishing to "name" their village in ways that you, Tamazight2001, would not approve ;) -- yes, a photo uploaded to a photo sharing platform of your choice with a link posted here would be most welcome.
Tamazight2001 (2018-11-06 13:32:47+00:00): What's politics  It's everything related to decisions we make as humans in life and by definition we are involved in it. 

It´s irrelevant whether I approve or not other local groups naming of their village.

I don't have any account on a photo sharing platform. I can send a photo to you since you are the one interested in it. I don't see people posting links to photos here. I already posted a link to a wikipedia reference where it can clearly be seen that the villlage in question is called At Dwala.
woodpeck (2018-11-06 14:12:12+00:00): Ok, let me rephrase: Let's keep value judgements out of it. You seem to think of the government as an "illegitimate dictatorship". This should not inform the decision of if and how we tag a local name; this decision should be based on reasons that are independent of whether the government is an illegitimate dictatorship or a stable democracy. 

I am not interested in receiving private communications about this matter as it would not help the public debate. If you do not have an account on an image sharing platform, could you open one? Perhaps wikimedia commons - upload image and link with the article you have quoted? Also I note that the name on the English Wikipedia has only been changed to "At Dwala" today (and before that, it has been "Beni Douala" uncontested for 8 years).
Tamazight2001 (2018-11-07 10:03:14+00:00): You make contradictory statements. On the one hand you yourself make the value judgment of  opting for the government name (ref. you said "put the name used by colonial-influenced government name")  while on the other hand you appeal for keeping value judgments out. So that the map can be of any use, the decision on how to tag correctly a village name should be based on how that place is called locally in their language. Of course, when we consider using government sources, we can't escape assessing the credibility of such source.
Do you know anything about that part of the world in question?

If the wrong name has been for 8 years, it only tells about the knowledge and quality of the editing of place names for this part of the world, until now. It can't be a justification for not changing the names and thus improving the quality of the map when we get the chance to have new more knowledgeable editors from that part of the world.
For your information, the tagging of that part of the world is so full of errors at the moment that we should welcome corrections.

I am not going to open any account and there are copyright restrictions on the photo that do not allow me to post it publicly. I have provided strong public evidence to prove that it is called "At Dwala" through an entry with this name in Wikipedia. That is sufficient.
user_5359 (2018-07-25 07:08:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If there two different POI in one building, please use to nodes inside the building (and not new keys).
BCNorwich (2018-07-25 06:22:58+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Can you please state exactly what problem you are trying to resolve and consider that there may be a problem with RunKeeper?

 
I've just looked at the changes you've made and I can see no real value in them. In fact, the ones that change 'designated' to merely 'yes' actually remove value from the database. 
A trunk road in the UK has implied use for foot and cycle traffic so there is no need to add the bicycle=yes, foot=yes tags. Specific cycleways on or by a trunk road should be mapped as they carry specific designations.

I would suggest that there was no problem with OSM data and that these changes ought to be reverted. 

If I can help please just ask, Regards Bernard
Derekthecat (2018-07-28 11:36:42+00:00): Hi Bernard,
When using the "snap to roads" function on runkeeper it was showing some sections of the A1 as inaccessible and circumventing them, which has been fixed by changing foot access to yes. I don't know how to post screen shots here to show you this. If this has problematic implications for the wider functions of the map then yes, of course, please revert this change.
BCNorwich (2018-08-10 07:20:52+00:00): Hi, sorry for the delay. The problem then is with Runkeeper as foot=designated should be accepted as meaning foot access is allowed. 

Where a path or track is tagged as highway=path, designation=public_footpath then the foot access should be tagged as foot=designated, not as foot=yes.
There are thousands of such ways in the UK, foot=designated shows folk that they are not just allowed on the path but have a right to be there.

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2018-08-10 07:22:08+00:00): I should have added that it would be advisable to inform Runkeeper of the problem.
عبد القادر الجزائري (2018-10-26 11:22:03+00:00): Vandalism report #8: Removal of French name by user Tamazight2001
عبد القادر الجزائري (2018-10-26 11:07:39+00:00): Vandalism report #7: Removal of French name by user Tamazight2001
Myazyk (2018-07-25 09:51:51+00:00): Полігон 5139637 тре розділити на дві частини. Там є паркан біля озер
literan (2018-07-25 11:10:02+00:00): неправильно: зачем дважды одно кафе нанесли, и на контур, и точкой? Исправлю.
Юрий Устинов (2018-07-25 13:10:26+00:00): интернет заглючил просто)
wo0GSWr6MfJgFj (2018-07-25 08:30:41+00:00): Well done! Just have a look, seems like there are some duplicate buildings in Enskogen.
tomasy (2018-07-25 09:53:07+00:00): Sorry, I do not understand why I did not get the old buildings in my view. I hope I have fixed it now.
Thanks again
wo0GSWr6MfJgFj (2018-07-25 11:19:53+00:00): No worries. Your work is well appreciated!
ianlopez1115 (2018-07-28 11:47:23+00:00): [Bagong Bayan, San Pablo] add alcohol shop
mavl (2019-07-21 08:47:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
booktiger (2019-05-13 02:15:23+00:00): 您好，Openstreetmap是公共地图，请不要把您自己家的地址标注在地图上哦～
First3h (2023-03-10 05:31:27+00:00): 文全你好~
Sanniu (2018-08-02 08:54:22+00:00): You changed only the name tag, and left all other name:* tags untouched. Please do a good work and fix all tags, otherwise this data is very hard to use...
surveyor54 (2018-07-25 21:36:21+00:00): Hi,
landuse=industrial, so wie ich das verstehe, wird für produzierendes Gewerbe benutzt, gehört die Fa. Tantec nicht auch dazu? 
Warum auf einmal commercial ? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org
/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial

Gruß
surveyor54
Hinkelstein69 (2018-07-26 07:01:05+00:00): Hallo surveyor54,
Danke für Deinen Hinweis, ich hatte diese Unterscheidung nicht gekannt und hätte mich natürlich vorher informieren müssen. Ich habe den Fehler korrigiert und um Prüfung gebeten. Ich hoffe das geht so in Ordnung? Kannst Du mir auch sagen, wie im Falle von Tantec verfahren wird, wenn das Firmengelände mehrere Gebäude hat? Also eins ist anscheinend das Verwaltungsgebäude, ein anderes die Produktion, usw. bekommen dann alle die Straße und Hausnummer, um zu erkennen dass sie zusammengehören?

Grüße 
Hinkelstein69
surveyor54 (2018-07-27 11:55:39+00:00): Hi,
Ich würde nur dem Hauptgebäude (Verwaltung) eine Adresse verpassen.

Man könnte auch das landuse=industrie an den Grenzen noch aufteilen und die Flachen wie folgt taggen:

landuse=industrie
name=Tantec
operator=Tantec GmbH
Vielleich auch noch die Adresse, website ....

Das gleiche mit Pneumax.

So kann man auch erkennen welche Gebäude zur Firma gehören.

Die Namen am Gebäude würde ich dann entfernen.

Ich fahre zwar öfters hier vorbei, hab es mir bis jetzt örtlich noch nicht angeschaut. Was ist es denn mit dem östl Gebäude. 

Gruß
surveyor54
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-25 16:42:13+00:00): Hi abbytheexplorer, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting almost 170 buildings? Thanks. Btw. your changeset comment was "added POIs based on field data collection GPS"...

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61042339
ma-rt-in (2018-07-26 07:53:14+00:00): Hallo, way 599489769 mit minspeed?, nicht eher maxspeed.
kreuzschnabel (2018-07-26 08:24:17+00:00): Gilt für die linke Spur: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.11984189999998&lng=7.542814050000061&z=18.25715776678834&pKey=zc0oTGaPhkwhFLqA02HHwA&focus=photo 
daher minspeed:lanes
MerlinPendragon (2018-07-25 18:36:30+00:00): Hey, the roads you put in have been removed as part of a construction project. This should have been obvious as some of the roads you've added go through buildings. I'll need to revert this changeset.
andreis_telenav (2018-07-26 07:12:34+00:00): Hello. Sorry for the inconvenience. If you thing there's something else to correct just let me know and I'll do the changes.
Thomas H aus B (2018-08-02 12:44:42+00:00): Hallo Tortinator,
du hast hier die Haus-Nr. 59a zwischen den Hausnummern 61 und 63 eingetragen, obwohl diese schon existierte (siehe Doppelhaushalte 59/59a). Wurde an der von dir gewählten Stelle ein neues Haus gebaut?
Tortinator (2018-08-03 16:38:06+00:00): Hallo Thomas!
du hast vollkommen recht! Hier habe ich mich vertan!
Kann ich es selbst rückgängig machen?
Bin noch Neuling hier.
Danke!
Gruß,
Torsten
Thomas H aus B (2018-08-04 05:16:08+00:00): Hallo Torsten,
kein Problem, ich habs rausgenommen.
Gruß
Thomas
Leo Slager (2018-07-25 08:26:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2018-07-25 08:29:26+00:00): De gebouwen worden rechtstreeks geïmporteerd vanuit het kadaster. Na een volgende import staat de fout dus ook weer in OSM. Bij het kadaster kun je een melding doen om de fout te laten herstellen. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=160000&geometry.y=455403.2&zoomlevel=0
Inzoomen op het gebouw, selecteren en op het blauwe potloodje klikken.
RulleBaas (2018-07-25 08:32:57+00:00): Op het kadaster zie ik dat de orientatie van het blok wel klopt. net zoals WOZ waardeloket (waarschijnlijk ook gekoppeld aan BAG?). Waar kan ik zien wanneer de laatste synchronisatie met kadaster is gedaan?
Leo Slager (2018-07-25 09:31:34+00:00): Als het kadaster de juiste situatie aangeeft, zou je op het forum een verzoek kunnen doen voor een nieuwe BAG import. Eén van onze specialisten zorgt er dan voor dat de gebouwen vanuit het kadaster worden overgenomen op de kaart.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
RulleBaas (2018-07-25 09:41:42+00:00): Dankjewel voor de tip, ik heb een verzoek gepost op het betreffende forum.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-25 16:47:27+00:00): Hi abbytheexplorer, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting almost 400 mapped buildings? Thanks. Btw. your changeset comment was "added POIs based on field data collection GPS"...

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61043905
RoterEmil (2018-09-04 23:48:57+00:00): Hallo, bitte in OSM nicht mit GROSSSCHREIBUNG arbeiten. Auch sollten Änderungssatzkommentare keine Werbung enthalten. Hier könnte er bspw. lauten 'München: Firma Unfallhelden ergänzt'. Die Großschreibung habe ich hier entfernt.
Danke
tux67 (2018-07-25 10:43:52+00:00): Warum hastdu hier den Strassennamen weggenommen? Da liegen immer noch Häuser an der Straße die zu derselben gehören. Desweiteren - im Sinne einer sinnvollen Bearbeitung überlappender Gebiete - kannst du bitte mal deine Changeset Kommentare und Source Angaben etwas aussagefähiger gestalten? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gute_.C3.84nderungssatz-Kommentare
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61044655
viloan (2018-07-25 08:16:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
UP12 (2018-07-25 07:49:40+00:00): Digo, em homenagem ao academico que faleceu
atcomapper (2018-07-25 07:50:11+00:00): Fjerner osak:revision tag fra adresser i København City
mueschel (2018-07-29 12:31:38+00:00): Hi,
could you check the name of this farm?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/610692055

Jan
Spectrokid (2018-07-30 12:22:37+00:00): It matches the name SDFE gives, but I don't have local knowledge.
mueschel (2018-07-30 14:36:05+00:00): Have a closer look, there is no name tag, just something that went wrong during copy and paste.
Spectrokid (2018-08-01 06:18:16+00:00): fixed
goedegazelle (2018-07-25 08:18:56+00:00): It's best to add the tourism=attraction to the already existing steps.
goedegazelle (2018-07-25 08:21:53+00:00): I have to correct myself. There is a bridge man_made=bridge under the steps. That is where the tourism tag should be added to.
abakus_uploader (2018-07-25 22:30:49+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-25 16:46:08+00:00): Hi TravGW, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped ways which are visible in the satellite imagery? Thanks. Btw. your changeset comment was "Added Parks. Moved POI."...

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61046573
TravGW (2018-07-25 17:25:16+00:00): Some of the deleted mapped ways are private driveways. Being new and very ambitious I decided to a little trimming and removed them. The rest of the deleted ways are in some way related to the oil industry and are not roads but are clearings or right-of-ways.
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-25 18:24:00+00:00): Hi TravGW, thanks for your answer. If a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private tag and don't delete the way. 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=private
atcomapper (2018-07-25 08:20:09+00:00): osak:revision fjernet fra adresser i København K
scratera (2018-07-25 17:58:28+00:00): scusate ma messo li così un nome  non dice nulla...si dovrebbe descrivere che cosa è in questo caso vi suggerisco di pigliare spunto da qua 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dobservatory
luschi (2018-07-30 21:02:41+00:00): penso che questo punto non è un "observatory".     
I penso che è una stazione meteorologica, e per quello si usa "man_made=monitoring_station"
mavl (2019-07-21 08:47:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 08:47:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Jan Westerhof (2018-07-26 09:25:41+00:00): Ik vond nog dit filmpje op https://www.bndestem.nl/oosterhout/dorst-heeft-eindelijk-een-veilig-fietspad~a78cdf5d/
Heinz_V (2019-01-20 12:37:44+00:00): Here you deleted a road. Please make corrections. Take care that this error doesn t happen again.
Heinz_V (2019-02-15 21:32:58+00:00): You just ignore the massage. That is not acceptable.
ejont (2019-04-03 18:43:27+00:00): I've restored the road. See also similar deletion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60215392
ejont (2019-04-04 14:00:51+00:00): Actually, the deletion happened here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61042893
Dyserth (2018-07-25 20:21:29+00:00): Hi Please see reply comment on C/S 60102631. Applies here too.
Warin61 (2018-07-26 02:23:24+00:00): If you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388771229/ 
you can see it now renders. It did not render before the tag change. 

I have commented at length on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60102631. Further comments can be made there.
Anakil (2018-08-03 11:31:16+00:00): Attention, tu avais retaggé un landuse=farmland en "highway=unclassified" :p Cela rend la moitié de la région de Tournai blanche ahah 
J'ai déjà corrigé le soucis.