piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
badenk (2021-05-04 01:47:34+00:00): Hi George Rhodes:

I looked afterwards in more detail at your original query and now at this one.  Here are some observations:

- the changes were made on Go Map!! 2.0.7

- it is impossible for me to disconnect or delete a way on Go Map!! or iD editor that has any relation attached.

- the only way that I can disconnect or delete a way, is to first go into iD editor and remove the relations from the concerned way.  I then can disconnect or delete the way.

- osmcha.org does not load on my browsers.

- I looked at some nodes on two ways that you referenced, and those nodes still retain their history:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3319036437/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7321172276/history

- There could be an OSM or possibly a Go Map!! bug.  I suspect the former, as the nodes apparently still exist and my second observation above.  I suggest you bring this up with Bryce Cogswell <bryceco@yahoo.com> if it bothers you.

- Since you are an Apple Dude, you could try it out yourself on Go Map!!.  It looks like the referenced ways were all "straightened".

- I have had loads of my prior history erased, and I have yet to lose any sleep over it.

thanks,
Baden
bryceco (2021-05-05 18:24:37+00:00): Looking over the edits the road deletions I saw are within the “Morogoro - Makutopora SGR” construction area. You can modify a relation (safely) by splitting a way that belongs to a route relation.
badenk (2021-07-04 04:32:41+00:00): Hi Mr. George Rhodes et al:

I have recently discovered that both iD editor and Go Map!!  have similar properties for (re)combining ways.  In both programs, first ascertain which way has the original (multiple) history and select it first, then add the adjoining way.  The resultant combined way retains the first way's history.

This information should allow you the ability to correct all the anomalies you discover.

I restored the the history for the particular way you were concerned about.

thanks,
Baden
SomeoneElse (2021-02-18 17:05:45+00:00): Hello reilly7607, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It'd be really helpful if your changeset comments explained a bit more about what you're actually doing - here you've used "Upgrades incomplete tags or/and nonstardard tags." which may be true but doesn't really explain what you're doing here - which seems to be mapping a golf course frm imagery.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
eduardo2580 (2021-02-18 18:34:09+00:00): Thanks,
 i will try improve my changeset comments and i added my first profile description here telling what i like to do here: "I like add missing tags to OSM because sometimes they change things like 'riverbank' to look like water on the map and when i add wikidata usually add more information to a feature and fix things." 
The golf course was already mapped i was adding missing tags warned by the editor making them having colors looking sand and grass. Apparently looks better now at least a liked. 
if you find any more problem with my changeset please tell me. i would like to improve it.

Best Regards,
reilly
SomeoneElse (2021-02-18 19:34:00+00:00): Thanks - better comments (from all sides!) help everyone to understand each other.
olo81 (2021-02-18 23:37:08+00:00): zdublowane zagospodarowanie terenu
canfe (2021-02-19 18:52:35+00:00): Le piazze devono prendere gli attributi delle vie a cui son collegate a meno che davvero non siano differenti.
user_5359 (2021-02-18 18:58:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add the note number in the change setzt comment (after seven days the solved note isn't visible)

Tanks for solving the note.
Note_Fixer (2021-02-19 00:15:27+00:00): Note 2532521
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-19 19:28:02+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this, it looks good to me
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-19 19:34:29+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this, it looks good to me, you've added lots of detail to it.
Slight thing, phone numbers should be entered in international format (+44 121..., not 0121).
I've fixed them here for you.
habi (2021-02-22 09:19:42+00:00): Hallo Marky
Du hast ein 'Review' angefragt.
Erstmalls willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, schön bis du da :)

Du hast dieses `building=house` einfach über das bestehende Doppel-Einfamilienhaus gezeichnet.
Ich persönlich hätte das Haus halbiert und der linken und rechten Hälfte die korrekten Tags gegeben, wie ich es jetzt im Changeset 99730701 gemacht habe (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99730701)
Zusätzlich mach aus meiner Sicht `layer=1` keinen Sinn, das würde bezeichnen, dass dieses Haus ob dem anderen liegt.

Ich nehme jetzt einfach mal an, dass das deine Nachbarschaft ist.
Es hilft allen BenutzerInnen von OpenStreetMap wenn du hier noch weitere Hausnummern und Details erfasst.

Bei Fragen und Unklarheiten einfach melden!
Gruss aus Bern,
Habi
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-19 19:35:27+00:00): Same comment about the phone number, but other than that all looks good, lots of detail.
JessAk71 (2021-02-18 23:50:10+00:00): Hi VLD174! I saw you removed the water tag on this water tank/parking lot here. I am not sure what the best tag would be for this - its a open surface water tank that is filled only when needed for filming and then drained for parking the rest of the time - it does have the 'intermittent' tag on it which does go along with the water tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:intermittent?uselang=en so not sure what you think about it but perhaps place the water tag back here or use a different tag to denote what this is?
RVR004 (2021-02-19 00:56:35+00:00): Hi JessAK71,

Thank you for your feedback and sharing more context about the parking lot!  Checking further on OSM Wiki, how do you think to add these three tags?

--natural=water
--water=basin (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Dbasin)
--intermittent=yes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:intermittent?uselang=en)

Thanks,
Yunzhi
JessAk71 (2021-02-19 19:34:59+00:00): Hi Yunzhi, yes that looks good, sounds good. Thanks!
!bm (2021-02-18 20:26:20+00:00): Hallo janolezab,

bitte eigenständige addr:*-nodes nicht kapern! Habe es entsprechend verbessert/gefixt in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99547190
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99547275

--besteGrüße!bm
janolezab (2021-03-06 11:36:59+00:00): Selbst wenn die Adresse nichts anderes enthält?

VG
!bm (2021-03-06 11:46:03+00:00): Das mag hier der eher seltene Ausnahmefall sein, aber ja, das würde ich so sehen, um alle Fälle einheitlich zu behandeln. Eine Adresse ist ja ein eher abstraktes/virtuelles Datum, während ein POI konkret ist.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-19 19:36:08+00:00): Again with the phone number, but again lots of detail and everything else looks good.
map per (2021-05-14 19:08:15+00:00): Hallo Sebastion,

nördlich vom Georgenstein hat jemand den Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171387298) mit Schlangenlinien eingezeichnet, obwohl der Weg dort gerade verläuft. Weil es seien könnte, dass du die Schlangenlinien eingezeichnet hast wollte ich dir bescheidsagen. Sieht nach zu sehr auf GPS vertraut aus.

Viele Grüße
map per
datamongers (2021-02-18 21:00:12+00:00): If you are going to be bulk changing trails from highway=path to highway=footway, you should probably also be adding horse=yes to them, as most of these trails allow horses, but many applications assume horses are not allowed on highway=footway.
G1asshouse (2021-02-20 09:50:38+00:00): I disagree with this change. I believe the error is on Wikidata's side and not OSM's side.

Yes, Q85812269 links to the Wikipedia article yet Q30253741 seems to hold more relevant information. I believe there are duplicate Wikidata entries and that the two entries need to be combined into Q30253741. I admit, I do not know how Wiki works so I may be mistaken.
Glassman (2021-02-20 15:27:32+00:00): Q30253741 is an education institute while Q85812269 is a building. Since the outline is of a building I chose it. Feel free to change the wikidata tag if you feel strongly about it. It you do, the wikipedia article also needs to be remove since the two don't match.
G1asshouse (2021-02-20 22:01:48+00:00): I see. Well, I will just be walking through the "I may be mistaken" door now. Thank you for taking the time to  explain.
Dawid2849 (2021-02-18 18:05:31+00:00): Wycofany changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99462341
SekeRob (2021-02-21 12:27:55+00:00): Hallo Carlo,

Yesterday I fixed a coding typo you made 3 days ago from sourece:ref to source:ref. The QA machine is now complaining that no ref = .... has been provided: "missing tag
source:ref without ref" Would you kindly do so. One of the change sets with your name is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99541579
All your coding problem you can see on this report https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?CarloPro . Follow the links to levels 1/2/3 for the details.

TIA
SomeoneElse (2021-03-31 23:07:23+00:00): Hello,
Just checking - in this changeset you changed http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=207403562 , which was a pipeline, to a path.
Was that what you were trying to do?
Best Regards,
Andy
olo81 (2021-02-18 23:39:45+00:00): administracja budynków to nie jest
landuse=industrial
Mannivu (2021-02-20 11:14:35+00:00): Ciao, potresti non essertene accorto, ma con questa modifica hai eliminato un landuse=industrial (nello specifico, la way 275503391). Fai attenzione quando rimuovi degli elementi: vanno rimosse solo le cose non esistenti nella realtà.
riccardomoleri (2021-02-20 12:05:41+00:00): Ciao, effettivamente non ho rimosso volontariamente nessun elemento che potrebbe corrispondere alla tua descrizione. Non me ne sono accorto. È possibile fare in modo di ripristinarlo?
Mannivu (2021-02-20 14:04:08+00:00): Non preoccuparti, supponevo fosse una svista. Sì, è possibile, e l'ho già ripristinato io :D
riccardomoleri (2021-02-20 15:15:37+00:00): Perfetto, grazie mille
Cercherò di stare più attento!
datamongers (2021-02-18 21:07:25+00:00): Thanks for the edit! You may want to check where you are getting your road names from, because several of these names have typos. The roads with "(private)" in the name should be tagged access=private and not have private in the name.
I'm also a little skeptical of the "Canyon Campground route" name, I dont know for sure that it's wrong, but i dont think i've seen any other roads in yellowstone with similar names.
user_3267700 (2021-02-18 21:36:33+00:00): Hi, I add the information private because in the past when I use Maps.me as a gps I drove on a private pathway without warning. The nane of the came from the https://www.nps.gov/tripideas/day-hikes-in-the-canyon-area.htm site.
datamongers (2021-02-19 12:01:10+00:00): I understand that you are trying to make maps.me better, but openstreetmap has accepted ways of doing things, and adding access restrictions in road names is not the right way. There is also no excuse for making spelling mistakes in road names and refusing to fix them.

I have fixed all the name errors from this edit.
user_3267700 (2021-02-19 14:57:35+00:00): D'abord je ne refuse pas de faire de changements. J'estime que c'est informations sont importantes pour les futurs usagers.  Il y a eu un incident il y a plusieurs années dans la région. Des touristes s'étaient engagés sur une route hivernale dans les montagnes après s"être perdus. Hors cette route étant carrossable l'été étaient un sentier de motoneige l'hiver. Ils se sont enlisés après quelques kilomètres à -25°C. Fort heureusement pour eux ils ont été secourus après quelques heures sinon ils seraient morts de froid. Il n'est pas possible d'ajouter un avertissement pour éviter ce genre de situation si je vous comprend bien.
datamongers (2021-02-19 15:17:19+00:00): Sorry, i dont argue on the internet.
Carnildo (2021-02-20 19:12:59+00:00): I know for sure that "Canyon Campground road" is wrong, and I'm reasonably sure the rest of the names are as well.  (Source: my parents spent a season working at Canyon Campground.)  I'll be reverting the batch.
user_3267700 (2021-02-20 20:08:37+00:00): https://www.nps.gov/yell/planyourvisit/hiking.htm If you zoom on Canyon village this is were I found the information
Carnildo (2021-02-20 21:16:40+00:00): That map says it's based on OpenStreetMap.
user_5359 (2021-02-19 05:45:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
aceman444 (2021-06-06 22:14:12+00:00): Zdroj takehoto nazvu, ktory znovu vyzera len ako opisny? Na Ortofotomozaike ho urcite nevidite.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-02-19 09:46:16+00:00): Hi ☺
Your changeset contains changes both in Mali and in Russia. Consider splitting such changesets in the future.
Have a nice day ☺
eggie (2021-02-18 19:09:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
feedback.. De tagging heb ik overgezet naar de amnity=parking die al gemapt was hier als vlak.

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-02-18 19:11:43+00:00): name=laag tarief parkeerterrein  zal niet de officiële straatnaam zijn.. Dus beter deze regel verwijderen. zijn.
De straatnaam zal Karel van Gelrestraat
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-18 19:14:40+00:00): name=laag tarief parkeerterrein  verwijderd
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
mvg
eggie
trial (2021-02-26 22:09:10+00:00): Bonjour, pourquoi avoir supprimé 
surface=compacted sur la zone piétonne du parc à chaînes ? Le revêtement a changé ?
Gnafron (2021-02-28 18:00:30+00:00): Erreur de ma part, le revêtement n'a pas changé, j'ai supprimé les deux tags au lieu de seulement leisure common, je rétablis
Gys de Jongh (2021-02-28 19:51:13+00:00): Dag Seat Ibiza,
waarom heb je de cycleway=lane cycleway:colour=red tags verwijderd van de Loofaert ????
MKnight (2021-02-18 20:38:43+00:00): Sieht ok aus, soweit ich das überschaue.
Mudumala (2022-04-29 11:31:46+00:00): Hi Arneex,

Trusting you are doing well!
While mapping in this region, I observed that some  of the ways such as way 908503020, way 908502671,way 908502670,way 908505394 were left untagged, please do look out for warnings/errors while uploading the changeset. I’m going ahead and marking these ways as highway=road as we are unsure about the classification as the satellite imagery is not very clear.. Please feel free to change the classification as per your knowledge. Thank you!


Regards
Rajeswari
blackboxlogic (2021-03-16 01:36:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding this fort! I'm wondering about the access=yes tag that you used which implies that anyone is welcome here. I visited this fort and I think there were "stay out" signs but my memory isn't what it used to be. Why did you choose access=yes? -Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99544412
mappin'molly (2021-03-16 14:51:26+00:00): Hi there! You're right, I should change the access tag. But this fort is actually located on a private island, there are signs saying "no public access" on the beaches, but there is no signage at the forts. You might be thinking of somewhere else! :)
blackboxlogic (2021-03-16 19:47:11+00:00): I corrected all the street names based on street signs on the eastern half of Cushing but didn't get to the western half. They could probably use some clean-up. If you're still on Cushing, verifying road names on the western half could be a fun treasure hunt and nice improvement to the map.
eggie (2021-02-18 19:41:48+00:00): Dag ov_fotograaf..
'k Heb even een van de ervaren OV mappers gevraagd om even te kijken... evt te helpen. 
Aan OV routes kun je niet met editor iD werken. De routes gaan dan stuk.
Het kan wel met editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        
Dat zal dus overschakelen worden. 

MVG
eggie
Leo Slager (2021-02-18 21:34:49+00:00): Dag ov_fotograaf,

De halte node heb ik even aangepast.
network en operator horen daar niet getagd te worden.
De halte is eigendom van de gemeente en kan door meerdere vervoerders worden aangedaan.
De halte kan zelfs deel uit maken van meerdere netwerken.
De routerelatie aanpassen met de editor iD is niet goed mogelijk. Het rondje over de Vorstiusrode/Muzieklaan/Vorstiusrode moet op de juiste plaats in de route worden ingevoegd. Helaas voegt de editor iD de nieuwe wegen achteraan toe aan de routerelatie zodat er een gebroken route achterblijft.
Aanpassen van de routes kan alleen goed gedaan worden met de editor JOSM zoals Eggie ook al aangeeft.
Ik heb de route even aangepast.
Als er een route moet worden aangepast, vraag dan even hulp op het forum of zet een opmerking op de kaart. Dan zal een ervaren mapper dat doen.
Leo Slager (2021-02-18 21:43:34+00:00): De routerelatie was nu op meerdere plaatsen gebroken en delen van de route stonden op de verkeerde plaats.
Leo Slager (2021-02-18 22:11:48+00:00): En omdat het een ringroute betreft met wegen die meerdere malen voorkomen in de routerelatie was het extra ingewikkeld om de zaak weer in orde te krijgen. Dat vergde dus bijna een half uur.
Laat je daardoor echter niet weerhouden.
Al doende leert men het vak.
maraf24 (2021-02-18 22:47:10+00:00): Ta edycja nie ma sensu - po co przeniosłeś adres z budynku na środek pola?
Grzegorz Jablonowski (2021-02-19 17:28:14+00:00): oczywiście że tak , nie było to zamierzone
maraf24 (2021-02-20 12:44:23+00:00): Ok, zmyliło mnie to, że to jest jedyna edycja w tym zestawie - zapis się jednak sam nie zrobił :)
Leo Slager (2021-02-18 23:21:02+00:00): Dat is correct, daarom had ik de route ook voorzien van de tag disused:route. Dat hebben we met elkaar zo afgesproken in het forum. Wees voorzichtig met verdere wijzigingen. Vraag zonodig om hulp, in het forum of door een opmerking op de kaart te plaatsen.
Deze wijziging wordt teruggezet.  
Komt de route na de Covid-periode weer terug, dan bespaart ons dat veel extra werk.
busfotodotnl (2021-02-19 07:18:49+00:00): Excuses
busfotodotnl (2021-02-19 07:21:57+00:00): Ik had mij ingelezen in alle paginas over ov en covid-ov. Wat ik mij afvroeg wanneer de community besluit wanneer een nu opgeheven lijn definitief verdwijnt? Van lijnen die in een vervoerplan, waar ik naar verwijs, zijn weggeschreven en niet zoals in maart 2020  plotsklaps even verdwenen, kan m.i. de community er vanuit gaan dat die lijnen de eerste jaren niet of nooit terugkomen. Wanneer is het beslismoment.
Leo Slager (2021-02-20 12:01:39+00:00): contact via PB
ZldYe (2021-02-20 12:49:33+00:00): Top, dankjewel!
ZldYe (2021-02-20 12:49:01+00:00): Dankjewel!
eggie (2021-02-18 20:06:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Feedback.. Het wandelpad heb je op slot hezet met access=no   Verboden toegang. Staat dit bord hier vooraan?
Zoniet .. beter nooit beginnen met access=no  Je ziet de paden dan ook niet goed op de kaart.

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-02-18 20:14:46+00:00): Dag ov fotograaf.. De website https://www.bruutbar.nl/  staat nog steeds op de node.. Wellicht even aanpassen?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-18 22:20:04+00:00): website verwijderd
user_5359 (2021-02-19 05:41:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag height=0 means that the building has no height above ground level.Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/908516271
harkaitz (2021-02-20 07:50:36+00:00): AL LADO DE TRANBIE IBILBIDEA, AHORA ESTA IZASKUN KALEA 2,4 Y 6
fgouget (2021-02-20 13:25:32+00:00): Désolé je ne parle pas le Basque.
Pourriez-vous traduire en Français ou en Anglais ?
fgouget (2021-03-01 02:04:23+00:00): D'après Google Translate il y aurait une rue à proximité du tram (mais où ?). Mais je ne vois pas le rapport avec les champs *date.

Ais-je par inadvertence changé quelque chose d'autre ?
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-19 19:40:31+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this. The fence you've added crosses runways at the moment. If they are no longer in use then they need to be changed to something like disused:aeroway=runway.
And is it a construction area to the north west of the fence now? In which case the outline of the airport needs updating (you could split the area if that's the case).
eggie (2021-02-18 22:30:19+00:00): Dag Jeroen.. Je vraagt om feedback. Je tagging lijkt me oke zo..
MVG
eggie
michalfabik (2021-02-18 20:26:57+00:00): Pozdrav, sad je označeno kao veterinarska ordinacija (amenity=veterinary). Treba označiti kao fakultet (amenity=university).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-12 23:56:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 100937721 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid MAPS.ME edits in Saudi Arabia. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4808 .
Kovoschiz (2021-02-18 21:32:05+00:00): Please don't add features which haven't started construction directly.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-18 21:32:30+00:00): It's not a `railway=disused` either
skquinn (2021-02-18 20:35:02+00:00): Again, what is your data source for these border changes?
Puxan (2021-02-19 09:40:37+00:00): Procura ajustar bien el tamaño de los edificios al de la imagen.                
Los edificios no deben pegarse habitualmente entre sí, a menos que compartan una misma pared como ocurre en los edificios de las ciudades. El programa tiende a pegarlos cuando están muy próximos, para evitarlo procura acercar más la imagen. Para separarlos si ya están pegados señala el punto, clic derecho y podrás ver un menú que te ofrece la opción de separar, escógela, señala entonces un lado de uno de los dos edificios, clic derecho, y selecciona desplazar, desplaza un poco el edificio y clic izquierdo para dejarlo.
Muy bien, sigue mapeando.                   
Joaquim
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99547409
Strubbl (2021-02-18 23:23:23+00:00): Hallo Claus, willkommen auf OSM. Ich vermute, dass du dein Unternehmen auf OSM einzeichnen möchtest?

Am einfachsten ist es, wenn du im Editor einen neuen Punkt hinzufügst. Das geht oben in der Mitte vom Editor. Klicke dort auf Punkt und platziere ihn, wo du ihn hinhaben möchtest. 
Beim Objekttyp, den du suchen kannst, suchst du nach der Art deines Unternehmens. Anschließend kannst du dem Punkt noch weitere Eigenschaften wie Adresse, Website oder Telefonnummer hinzufügen, wenn du möchtest.
Im Moment hast du die Hausnummer 140 und das Gebäude von der Nr. 142 mit dem Unternehmesnamen beschrieben. Dies kannst du anschließend rausnehmen.

Wenn du weitere Hilfe benötigst, schreib einfach hier auf dieser Seite einen neuen Kommentar. 

Falls das alles zu kompliziert ist, trage dein Unternehmen m.H.v. der Website https://www.onosm.org/ ein.
Strubbl (2021-02-21 00:45:56+00:00): Hallo Claus, das Kilbee Geschäft ist nun korrekt erfasst. Wenn du weitere Daten zu dem Geschäft hinzufügen möchtest (wie Telefon, Website o.ä.), findest du es hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=8441825993#map=19/48.11076/11.57739
olo81 (2021-06-10 14:15:11+00:00): wywalone, brak źródeł lub trolling
Dimitar155 (2021-02-26 14:56:54+00:00): Hello EuxeinosPontos,

It looks like the streams that you've mapped don't exist according to Mapillary. I think that it would be better to delete them.

Regards, Dimitar155
Euxeinos (2021-03-08 19:46:50+00:00): These streams do exist, but they are intermittent and their riverbanks are located the roads, plus they end on tens of storm drains, which exist on the map and are appearing on Mapillary. I can provide photos of these streams flowing side by side with Mapillary's shots if you wish.
Dimitar155 (2021-03-08 20:21:39+00:00): If they are connected to drains, shouldn't they be tagged with waterway=ditch or waterway=drain?
Константин Гам (2021-08-27 15:29:10+00:00): Внося "Корректные изменения" вы сметили трассу дороги и многих обьектов более чем на 30 метров от реальных координат.
Вы добавляли что-то в данном пакете или можно его откатить без вреда для данных?
Константин Гам (2021-08-27 15:30:09+00:00): Обрисовывая снимки (которым, кстати, не один год (!)), надо их внимательно привязывать на каждом участке рисования (здесь почти везде рельеф различный).