piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 09:41:26+00:00): Hallo en welkom op OpenStreetMap!
﻿OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken. Het is de bedoeling dat de werkelijkheid in kaart wordt gebracht. Ook een Pokemon speler kan waardevolle data inbrengen, mits deze voldoen aan de werkelijkheid. Uw edit zal gecontroleerd worden op vandalisme en zal om deze reden teruggedraaid kunnen worden.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 09:45:20+00:00): wat is de naam van dit parkje, een park heeft meestal een naam, en misschien wel een website.
Dan wil ik kijken wat ik kan betekenen om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 09:53:35+00:00): Na enig zoeken vond ik dat dit park "de Wieroevers" heet.
Inmiddels aangebracht.
Wat HenkL zegt is juist en ongetwijfeld was je bedoeling goed, maar wat je hebt gedaan, is dat de detaillering hebt verwijderd. Een park is een overkoepeling. 
het grondgebruik (landuse) is grass/forest en (natural) water en het rekreatiedoel (leisure) is een park.
En niet ieder stukje gras is een park.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Mocht je vragen krijgen, stel ze dan gerust.
BeKri (2017-01-28 11:07:37+00:00): Servus,
Biste Du so nett und würdest Dich mit Bezug auf
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45571896 und den Kommentaren äußern? 
Danke und Grüsse
derBeKri
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 10:16:25+00:00): For the record: was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45543558
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-07 15:20:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48477734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting self-described Pokemon go edits.
Endres Pelka (2017-01-27 20:12:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 10:15:48+00:00): For the record: was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45543558
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-07 15:20:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48477734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting self-described Pokemon go edits.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-29 19:54:48+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469253136 as a park, but it doesn't really look like one...
Please don't add things to OpenStreetMap that don't exist - and I'm sure that there are lots of other things to add in Llanelli that haven't been added yet.
Best Regards,
Andy
nammala (2017-06-23 09:38:15+00:00): Hi Vz123,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding random park and footway which is not present on the Imagery. Could you please confirm the edits.

Regards,
nammala
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 10:14:56+00:00): For the record: Was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45543558
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 09:57:14+00:00): Hallo en welkom op OpenStreetMap!
﻿OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken. Het is de bedoeling dat de werkelijkheid in kaart wordt gebracht. Ook een Pokemon speler kan waardevolle data inbrengen, mits deze voldoen aan de werkelijkheid. Uw edit zal gecontroleerd worden op vandalisme en zal om deze reden teruggedraaid kunnen worden.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 10:02:21+00:00): Per ongeluk heb je een node opgepakt en vastgelijmd aan een ander element, hier kun je in de toekomst rekening mee houden.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45535834
https://www.dropbox.com/s/r9ldogg1v29zf5b/2017-01-28_10-59-43.png?raw=1

De circel met grass heb ik verwijderd deze is geen werkelijkheid, en is overigens niet door je aangebracht maar stond er al.
Veel plezier bij het mappen gewenst.
joost schouppe (2017-01-27 07:51:30+00:00): Dag gangster,
In OpenStreetMap mappen we enkel dingen die bestaan, niet dingen waarvan we graag zouden willen dat ze bestaan. Als je dat graag wil doen, kan ik je wel wat interessante links bezorgen.

In het geval van het "lol park" is het vrij duidelijk dat het om iets fictief gaat. Zijn je andere parken wel echt?
escada (2017-01-27 07:59:48+00:00): Is het mogelijk dat je zo hoopt dat je een nest Pokemons kan creëren ?
escada (2017-01-27 08:02:15+00:00): Heb lol park al verwijderd.
Rocketgangster (2017-01-27 12:09:31+00:00): Oké het lol park was om even uit te proberen, maar de 2 anderen zijn wel degelijk interessante parken.
joost schouppe (2017-01-27 12:36:52+00:00): OK, bedankt voor de verduidelijking :)
escada (2017-01-27 13:41:13+00:00): Geen probleem, denk er wel aan dat alle wijzigingen onmiddellijk op de server terecht komen. Dat wil zeggen als je experimenteert, het best mogelijk is dat je iemand zijn navigatie in de war stuurt of rapport ivm het aan km2 park in een gemeenten
Dus geen experimenten bewaren in het vervolg aub, en bedankt om die 2 ontbrekende parken toe te voegen.
GinaroZ (2017-01-27 00:24:06+00:00): Please don't add fake parks
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 10:13:50+00:00): For the record: this changeset, containing fictional changes only, was reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45543558
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 10:06:26+00:00): Paden naar wegen hebben normaal gesproken verbinding met elkaar. Inmiddels heb ik dit voor je aangepast. Teken netjes en niet door de huizen (in dit geval is het heel netjes)
Ik wilde het herstellen maar zag dat je het al verwijderd had. Ik zal een poging doen om hier wat paden in te brengen (naar werkelijkheid)
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45536033
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 10:09:41+00:00): Probeer ook de weg een verbinding te laten maken met de andere weg waar hij aansluiting heeft.
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 10:10:44+00:00): Hier bedoel ik.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45536033
Inmiddels heb ik het gecorrigeerd.
BCNorwich (2017-01-27 18:22:44+00:00): Your silly fiction has been removed. If you need help adding genuine features to OSM please just ask.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-07 15:20:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48477734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting self-described Pokemon go edits.
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 10:20:13+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45536106
Wees voorzichtig met combinatie footway=sidewalk
Dit wordt veroorzaakt door ID.
Lees hier wat sidewalk is.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk
GinaroZ (2017-01-27 00:32:17+00:00): Looks like a house to me?
blackadder (2017-01-27 10:03:41+00:00): I've reverted this and the earlier edit
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-07 15:20:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48477734 where the changeset comment is: Reverting self-described Pokemon go edits.
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 10:15:05+00:00): Dit is ZEKER geen park.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45536251
Dit soort edits zijn taboe en duiden op Pokemon spelers.
inmiddels gecorrigeerd.
Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen.
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 10:15:57+00:00): Revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45587380
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 10:20:51+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen.
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 10:12:29+00:00): For the record: this changeset, containing fictional changes only, was reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45543558
nammala (2017-02-17 05:48:10+00:00): Hi sw2393,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits in the changeset like waterbody (469255467) and the national park with a relation doesn't make proper data which is not on the ground. Make sure you add ground truth data rather than adding fantasy data. I am going ahead and deleting your edits. Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 10:11:24+00:00): For the record: this changeset, containing fictional changes only, was reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45543558
demon_box (2017-06-10 14:16:40+00:00): ciao,non serve mettere leisure=park su un nodo quando l'hai già correttamente messo sull'area del parco stesso.
grazie ;-)
Carnildo (2017-01-27 02:21:38+00:00): Are you sure about the park you added just north of the cemetery?  It looks to me like it's just somebody's house.
EdLoach (2017-01-27 01:16:25+00:00): I've removed this as you've drawn it over a house, so can't be in the correct place.
literan (2017-01-27 12:05:22+00:00): извините, что это за хаос и каша? мне пришлось удалить почти все, что вы тут "нарисовали".
FTA (2017-01-29 15:47:33+00:00): Hi Rafa95,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please be careful not to add fake data to the database--our data is depended on by a lot of people. I see there are a lot of real features missing in the greater DC area from the database, though. I'd encourage you to find parks, swimming pools, or other objects that actually do exist but are missing and add those! Let me know if you have any questions.
Happy Mapping,
Ethan aka FTA
FTA (2017-01-29 16:09:20+00:00): Edits have been reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45623735
naoliv (2017-01-28 23:24:06+00:00): Gabriel, por favor, não insria objetos inexistentes no mapa.
FTA (2017-01-29 16:24:36+00:00): These edits were reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45624756
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 10:23:09+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 10:23:14+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45537398
landuse=grass mag gerust blijven staan naast de leisure=playground
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 10:26:32+00:00): historic=monument heeft in OSM een heel andere betekenis dan je zelf dacht.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:historic%3Dmonument
Ik heb het inmiddels aangepast.
PS.
Het is wel degelijk een gebouw, het staat ook in de BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen)
vandaar dat building=yes terug is gezet.
Succes met mappen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 11:57:29+00:00): Hier ga je echt te snel.
sponsoring als name tag is niet de bedoeling.
Verdere uitleg wil ik geven op verzoek.

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45537656
Commodoortje (2017-01-28 11:57:33+00:00): Deze changeset zal worden teruggedraaid.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45589564#map=16/50.9777/5.8486&layers=N
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-28 09:29:39+00:00): #pleasereview
FTA (2017-01-29 16:24:34+00:00): These edits were reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45624756
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 10:09:51+00:00): For the record: this changeset, containing fictional changes only, was reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45543558 – thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-29 15:14:34+00:00): #pleasereview fictional data
samely (2017-01-31 19:39:11+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM, this edit looks strange, can you confirm these streets exists or revert it please?
FTA (2017-01-27 04:55:25+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! You've been adding some great detail to the map since you've joined. We count on local knowledge to make the map a better place! That said, please make sure you're only mapping real objects. Things you add go into the live database, which is depended upon by businesses, governments, and even humanitarian organizations. If you have any further questions about mapping, don't hesitate to give me a shout!
Best,
Ethan aka FTA
FTA (2017-01-29 16:24:31+00:00): These edits were reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45624756
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 10:08:03+00:00): For the record: this changeset, containing fictional changes only, was reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45543558
literan (2017-01-27 11:25:27+00:00): Здравствуйте! тег name - только для имен собственных
BCNorwich (2017-01-27 12:52:25+00:00): Removed paths drawn over established housing.
kartler175 (2017-01-28 11:05:35+00:00): Please check if amenity=parking is prroper tagging for this kind of areas: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking. I don't think so.
Please use the capabilties of your editing tool to draw rectangled areas.

Please don't create nodes shared by different kind of objects. e.g. aereas and address interpoation lines.
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 10:05:18+00:00): For the record: this changeset, containing fictional changes, was reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45543558 – thanks!
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:17:13+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
Chetan_Gowda (2017-02-09 06:56:55+00:00): reverted the changes.
carciofo (2017-02-24 17:29:12+00:00): Hi lazy5, thanks for your contributions in and around Amelia Earhart Park. It look as if you may have forgotten to check for overlapping roads & trails as some of the paths overlap existing features. Uploading unchecked GPX tracks is discouraged, so just make sure you check them next time before uploading :) Let us know if you need any help at https://help.openstreetmap.org or by checking the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org. Happy mapping!
linkymackenzie (2017-01-27 02:09:14+00:00): Just a little confused on whether some of these things are footpaths or paths, there are a few different kinds of pavement/ stones, widths on the paths. And also I know there are signs posted saying not vehicles and no horses. And I don't see many bikes and all they do is make a mess of the path so I believe most people here prefer they stay next to the highway. Anyway if you are in the area feel free to look around and see if this mapping needs some changing, or I am open to suggestions and will be willing to fix it up. Thank you in advance!
menzo2003 (2017-01-27 10:37:57+00:00):     Hallo en welkom op OpenStreetMap!
    OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken. Het is de bedoeling dat de werkelijkheid in kaart wordt gebracht. Ook een Pokemon speler kan waardevolle data inbrengen, mits deze voldoen aan de werkelijkheid. Uw edit lijkt op vandalisme en zal om deze reden teruggedraaid worden.

    Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:
    http://www.openstreetmap.org/help
    http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
    http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

    Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
miluethi (2017-01-29 21:28:21+00:00): Please delete your path in the Farrell Park again. There is no satellite imagery supporting these crazy lines.
n76 (2017-01-27 21:07:48+00:00): We may want to merge the name you tagged on a single node to be on the park boundary polygon. I mapped that from Bing imagery, so if you are familiar with the area you could probably improve on the outline.
oba510 (2017-01-30 07:15:49+00:00): Hi, openstreetmap is a map of the real world that is used by many people for a variety of purposes. Please only add things that actually exist in reality. Thanks! Your changes have been reverted.
n76 (2017-01-27 21:04:48+00:00): An entrance probably ought to be either on the boundary to the park and/or on the sidewalk leading in.

Unless there is something showing an actual name on the entrance, it should not have a name=* tag.
Endres Pelka (2017-01-27 20:10:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
AragonChristopherR17Z (2019-11-14 04:26:20+00:00): Various streams coming down from Izalco Volcano to the population of Izalco
marczoutendijk (2017-01-27 13:38:37+00:00): Dit is helemaal geen park maar de tuintjes van de huizen die eromheen liggen.
Is dit tbv. Pokemon?
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Als je zelf de boel niet opruimt, wordt het teruggedraaid.
n76 (2017-01-27 21:06:04+00:00): Are you familiar with this area? It would be nice if we had a boundary around it but all I can tell from Bing imagery is the boundary for the scrub which may or may not be the boundary of the park.
Dizzlol (2017-01-27 21:10:42+00:00): Yes, I live down the street. See the trail? There's a path to get to where the marker is as well. For the park
n76 (2017-01-27 21:58:23+00:00): I need to go over and hike that area sometime. Looks like there is an access path from the end of Del Rio. I took the liberty of adding that just now.
n76 (2017-01-27 21:58:49+00:00): Sorry, not Del Rio, Del Dios.
mattchn (2017-01-28 01:32:54+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding Coal Creek to the map! Some of your paths added look a little strange as they seem to zig-zag through private property. What kind of paths are they?
MrZuhalter (2017-01-29 00:07:23+00:00): they do go through private property, I marked the ones on mine and my parents property. I left it up to others to mark their own. The trails actually go all the through Brooks and up around Coal Creek Heights.
mattchn (2017-01-29 19:42:59+00:00): Thanks for your answer! Maybe you should add access=private to these paths (or access=permissive if the public is allowed there). See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 10:01:56+00:00): For the record: this changeset, containing fictional changes only, was reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45543558 – thanks!
JamesKingdom (2017-07-20 20:55:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50442360 where the changeset comment is: Reverting old user doodle
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:46:13+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Chrysopras (2017-01-28 09:34:27+00:00): Bad changeset; I already tried to revert that changeset, but this is a complicated case, so I asked for help: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57158
I hope some experienced mapper can do the revert.
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 10:00:27+00:00): For the record: this changeset was reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45614875 – thanks to mapper surveyor54 for doing the revert!
Unhallowed (2017-01-30 19:58:49+00:00): VeganEmperor, you shouldn't override bike paths into footpaths. This bike path is clearly marked, I will be requesting a revert on this changeset.
Bootprint (2017-01-27 05:41:33+00:00): Is this park real?
Unhallowed (2017-01-28 00:12:11+00:00): No, it's a Pokemon player abusing the map.

Santa Monica already has amazing Pokemon spawns, don't be greedy.

I'm still new here, can someone revert this?
Chrysopras (2017-01-28 09:33:05+00:00): I already tried to revert that changeset, but this is a complicated case, so I asked for help: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57158
I hope some experienced mapper can do the revert.
Chrysopras (2017-02-01 09:58:05+00:00): For the record: this changeset was reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45615298 – thanks to mapper FvGordon for his help!
Endres Pelka (2017-01-27 20:10:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-28 00:11:44+00:00): Hi Rich Piana, welcome to OSM. I think your edits can't be correct. Could you please name your source? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45539569
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-28 00:12:11+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45545717
TheSwavu (2017-01-28 10:09:14+00:00): Hi

Please don't feel the need to add names to every path. See:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Thanks
Glassman (2017-01-27 03:24:46+00:00): I'm going to change this to show the address using tags instead of using a name tag.
Unhallowed (2017-01-28 00:20:08+00:00): Can someone with more experience please review these changes by VeganEmperor?
I'm pretty sure he erased some cycle paths at the Aquarium of the Pacific that were here before, which from what I read is a huge detriment to the map.
Unhallowed (2017-01-30 19:59:55+00:00): Disregard, this changeset doesn't include the bike path changes.
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-29 15:15:54+00:00): #pleasereview name of the object
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-29 15:18:20+00:00): #pleasereview name of the object: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469289678
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-29 15:19:19+00:00): #pleasereview Is way on the ground?
Mashin (2017-01-28 04:08:35+00:00): Hi paulte, I changed tagging of your path to more appropriate highway=footway.
Carnildo (2017-01-27 05:41:58+00:00): If you put the address in the address field rather than the name field, route-finding software can use it when users enter it as their destination.
Josef K (2017-02-04 05:38:29+00:00): Your edit was reverted because it reclassified areas with false information. Please refrain from unsubstantiated edits which could be considered vandalism.
oba510 (2017-01-27 10:56:02+00:00): Hi, you added a bunch of randomly zig-zagging footpaths through the backyards in the middle of this block.  They obviously don't exist, so I have reverted your changes.
TheSwavu (2017-01-27 20:22:45+00:00): Hi,

This "park" is on private land. In OSM parks have to be public:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Mapeiro (2017-08-17 17:31:52+00:00): A Otto Benack não tem essa importância ou movimento todo pra ser considerada secondary. Qual foi o seu critério para fazer o upgrade de tertiary pra secondary?
Victor 2015 (2017-08-17 20:55:54+00:00): Desde que a rua Otto Benack passou a fazer binário com a rua Dom Bosco, que é uma via secondary, a metade do grande movimento desta passa a ser transferido para a rua Otto Benack, e assim acaba se dividindo a importância do fluxo entre as duas ruas.
nevw (2017-01-27 05:53:04+00:00): I notice that you are changing many of the cycleways through your area to footways.
You are to map them as cycleways if they have cycleway signs. Pedestrians can freely use the cycleways too.
All the ones that are cycleways will need to be fixed. Please be more careful.