piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Cuddle Bar (2017-01-18 17:00:43+00:00): Thank you for your time and effort to check the website and update the information accordingly.
Fri and sat are till 03 AM but I could not change it on OSM as it was no option to add it!

How can I highlight my location on your OSM?
Best regards,
Cuddle
Commodoortje (2017-01-18 18:16:18+00:00): You can search on "cuddle amsterdam" 
See this link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=cuddle%20amsterdam#map=19/52.37536/4.89395&layers=N
Openinghours are set fri & sat till 03AM.
The site has to render it, takes a while (SHIFT+F5 speeds up)
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
RicoElectrico (2017-01-18 20:52:41+00:00): Cześć, ten sklep chyba nie zajmuje całego budynku, prawda? Trzeba zamiast tego dodać go jako punkt. A, no i pole opisu (description) to nie miejsce na teksty reklamowe. Jesteśmy mapą, a nie słupem ogłoszeniowym :P
mavl (2019-01-02 16:13:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
letihu (2017-02-07 08:39:08+00:00): Die Baustelle kannst Du vergrößern ;-)
Das Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27261258/history
ist auch so gut wie weg.
mavl (2019-01-02 16:13:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
utack (2017-02-26 21:13:33+00:00): Die "denomination" soll vermutlich "protestant" sein, oder?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:denomination#Christliche_Konfessionen
mavl (2019-01-02 16:13:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Alexander-II (2017-01-19 06:44:09+00:00): тэг note - это скорее информация для внутреннего использования картографами, описание "для всех" это description. я поправлю
mavl (2019-01-02 16:12:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
tomasy (2017-01-18 18:31:27+00:00): Is this a correct mapping? The buildings are very small and none are squared.
gerosm (2017-01-19 07:23:34+00:00): Hallo, 
den Weg 364727630, den du ersatzlos gelöscht hast, bin ich vor einem Monat noch gegangen. Vor 1-2 Jahren wurde der erst errichtet, die Luftbilder sind älter! Manchmal wäre es schon sinnvoll, vorm Löschen mal nachzufragen! Bitte revertieren! Falls Du natürlich vor kurzem vor Ort warst und der Weg wurde tatsächlich entfernt ist mein post natürlich hinfällig.
bastibay (2017-01-19 11:34:07+00:00): Sorry, die Umgehung der Eimersmühle erschien mir zuerst nicht plausibel. Habe sie wieder ergänzt; passt es so?
gerosm (2017-01-20 08:26:43+00:00): Ok, ich habs noch ein bisschen überarbeitet. Auch den ehemaligen Mühlbach gibts nur noch rudimentär. Ich werde ihn mal bei Gelegenheit vor Ort näher anschauen.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 15:12:07+00:00): Hi mxrvks,
Just for info, I commented about the "disputed" change over in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45210666#map=6/44.066/15.515 .  There's been no response there as yet.
It might be worth you commenting there (and here) about the change as well - say why you consider Kosovo's borders to be administrative.  A changeset comment of "updated Kosovo" doesn't really say much.
As you'll no doubt be aware the DWG has mediated in a number of disputes in Kosovo over the years (often to do with place name languages - we've tried to be fair to all language communities in the country).
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 15:42:33+00:00): Thanks.
mavl (2019-01-02 16:41:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-02 16:40:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Alexander-II (2017-01-19 06:40:34+00:00): Но если ворота есть физически, но без возможности проезда и прохода, то можно было на них поставить access=no. А если проехать нельзя, но пройти можно, то vehicle=no + foot=yes. Если знаете, как там наверняка, то можно уточнить
Alexander Zatzepin (2017-01-19 07:46:43+00:00): Вчера еще раз посмотрел внимательнее. Да, ворота все таки там есть, они просто серые (в цвет забора), поэтому не заметил сразу. Проезда/прохода там нет, т.е. cудя по всему я должен был поставить access=no. Подскажите, пожалуйста, как мне найти точную координату той точки, которую я удалил ? (а то не вижу в этом интерфейсе http://clip2net.com/s/3GyDE8e
Alexander-II (2017-01-19 07:53:23+00:00): Я сделаю откат по этой правке и вернется прежняя точка, можно будет ее и подправить.

А если ворота все же используются, но ограниченным кругом людей (только владельцем территории), то access=private.
Более подробно про доступ написано здесь https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
Alexander Zatzepin (2017-01-19 08:06:09+00:00): Спасибо за информацию, все поправлю, как вы вернете точку обратно
geodreieck4711 (2017-01-19 07:25:22+00:00): an den Hausnummern fehlt das addr:street - tag....
eggie (2017-03-10 22:01:03+00:00): Beste Pim, Moet het "monument" in het perkje aan de Doctor Kuyperstraat niet memorial zijn ipv monument? Wat wij een monument noemen is in het Engels een memorial. een monument is meer een gebouw waar je op kunt klimmen. (tombe bv) 
Gr Eggie
eggie (2017-03-10 22:02:44+00:00): Zie hier ook Joods monument.. dus memorial. Volgens mij heb ik het er ooit opgezet.
eggie (2017-03-10 22:02:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45273202#map=19/51.91771/6.37284
uvi (2017-02-14 15:26:54+00:00): Handelt es sch bei der "Milchtankstelle" um einen Automaten? Dann empfiehlt es sich diesen nach diesem Beispiel einzutragen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264211545
oba510 (2017-01-19 09:44:58+00:00): Hi, you have added a parking aisle in a small parking lot, but tagged it as highway=residential.  Parking aisles should be tagged as highway=service, service=parking_aisle. Thanks!
ridixcr (2017-01-20 17:14:56+00:00): Hi again Oba510,
Thanks again for letting me know about this and also clarifying what tags are apt. The changes have been done accordingly. They can be found in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45299739.
Commodoortje (2017-01-18 16:50:14+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleren middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuilding tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging, een beetje verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-18 16:53:20+00:00): De gegevens die u geplaatst heeft, zijn al aanwezig op OpenStreetMap.
Ik heb de node samengesmolten met de contouren van Batavia Stad
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22802810
oba510 (2017-01-19 10:55:26+00:00): I noticed that you've been adding roads to the national labs here.  Did you look at the aerial imagery or the tagging of the other roads that they connect to?  There are several different kinds of barriers all over this road and others, and access is very restricted.  Please make sure to at least include the appropriate access tags!  Thanks!
yurasi (2017-01-19 14:48:08+00:00): Hi Oba510,
Thank you for bringing this issue to my notice. I hadn't realised about restricted access to the roads. I have added the appropriate access tags. Apologies for this slight on my part and thanks again.
opendcc (2017-01-18 18:45:02+00:00): Wow. Das wird dauern, bis ich da die Hausnummern abgegrast habe ... oft komme ich von Velden via Loiperstätt rein und gehe dann nach Ranoldsberg.
miche101 (2017-01-19 06:36:22+00:00): ..ja kein Stress ;-) Winterzeit is bei mir immer Luftbildzeit :-D
letihu (2017-01-31 18:22:03+00:00): Warum sind den unter jedem Gebäudepunkt ein leerer node? Z. B. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4616478013/history#map=19/50.63756/6.27206
Über 900 nodes sind das.
Fallen diese Fehler denn nich auf in der uralten JOSM-Version (7643 de)?
oba510 (2017-01-19 09:19:49+00:00): Hi, you've added a couple of ways in a parking lot, but tagged them as highway=residential.  In general, these should be tagged as highway=service with appropriate service=* tags (eg: service=parking_aisle for parking aisles)
DannyAiquipa (2017-01-20 15:18:51+00:00): Hey there!
Thank you for bringing this issue to my notice. I didn't realize about the commercial buildings that are around this area, so I retagged the highways. 
Thanks again!
Constable (2017-01-19 11:49:44+00:00): ciao, per favore inserisci nell'apposito campo un breve commento di quel che hai modificato (aggiunte case, cambiato nome, eliminata strada,...)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments.3F
grazie
Constable (2017-01-19 11:51:13+00:00): faccio riferimento a tutti i tuoi futuri changeset; "#polimappers #polimappers01 #youthmappers" non aiuta gli altri mappatori a capire che modifiche hai apportato alla mappa
grazie
naoliv (2017-01-19 10:17:49+00:00): johnmogi, por que você apagou esse monte de área aqui?
A não ser que saiba realmente o que está fazendo, por favor, evite modificações grandes ou complexas dessa forma.
Você acabou quebrando as áreas que representam a vegetação.
oba510 (2017-01-19 09:16:13+00:00): This appears to be a private driveway serving a couple of houses, not a residential road.  Are you sure the tagging is correct?
letihu (2017-01-26 17:35:04+00:00): Bitte lass bitte unter den Gebäudeecken nicht die ganzen leeren nodes. JOSM hat dich vor dem Hochladen sicher auf die Fehler hingewiesen.
letihu (2017-01-26 17:39:30+00:00): Hier ein paar nodes, die ich schon mal gelöscht habe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4616501569/history#map=19/51.50421/7.41566
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4616501570/history#map=19/51.50424/7.41565
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4616501567/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4616501568/history
geodreieck4711 (2017-01-19 08:05:09+00:00): an den Gebäuden waren sehr viele überschneidende Linien......
Ökkel (2017-01-22 20:04:36+00:00): Ja, der Tracer2 hat ja seine Macken, dazu liefert das im Moment scheinbar stark ausgelastete ALKIS öfters pixelige Kacheln. Ich habe vor dem Hochladen schon einiges glattgebügelt.
chillly (2017-01-18 17:16:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

The Minibugs nursery needs a building tag (building=yes would be fine). Without it you just see the outline, not a filled in building.
Hjart (2017-01-18 18:43:57+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Bemærk at jeg med vilje havde skilt vejen fra skovpolygonen.
DaveF (2017-01-19 11:57:14+00:00): Hi 
Welcome to OSM (or are you a returning mapper? I vaguely remember a similarly named contributor)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.41841/-2.63637

I'm aware you rode the highway & not the path, but could you please make an educated guess as to the cyclepath's direction so that it doesn't clash with the roundabout & other parts of the route?

Also the roundabout sections you deleted were split to allow for bus route relations. Please have a read of the concept here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation

Thanks
DaveF
Craig Rockliffe (2017-01-19 23:11:26+00:00): Hi DaveF
THanks for the welcome, I'm new to editing (usually everything has been correct) and wanted to help out as I had the data.

I thought I had updated the path as I went but I clearly failed halfway along, I have updated it now from memory but will try and trace it in the near future.

I want to do some tweaking to the roundabouts as I don't think they are quite right and will use the link you've provided to correct the mistake I made in relocating it.

Thanks
Craig
DaveF (2017-01-20 14:20:10+00:00): Excellent. If you need advice or an edit checked, please ask. You can contact people privately via:http://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/DaveF.
Re the roundabouts, The a370 one looks a tad small especially in the feeder road splays. If you're in the vicinity could you have a look at those? Happy mapping.
John Austin (2017-01-22 18:50:59+00:00): Not intended as a map update. This taxi stand was intended as a bookmark.
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-18 19:35:58+00:00): Hallo YNS_KLG, willkommen beim OSM Projekt. Mit deiner "Aktualisierung & Verbesserung" hast du leider ein paar Sachen gemappt, die bereits vorhanden waren. Beispiel dein neuer Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466960482 ist eigentlich bereits vorhanden durch folgenden Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132193324

Im Detail können alle Änderungen hier gesehen werden: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45276363

Das muss sich bitte jemand noch einmal alles etwas genauer anschauen. #pleasereview

Danke & Viele Grüße
Pascal
Tomas Straupis (2017-01-18 19:58:33+00:00): Change does not comply with Lithuanian mapping agreements. Reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-01-18 17:52:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 44225033.
Hjart (2017-01-18 18:48:40+00:00): Bemærk at der i forvejen  var en ruterelation der beskriver Bindeballestien: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/374658 og at den måde du forsøger at beskrive den på her ikke er den mest smarte.
Nakaner (2017-01-20 00:01:05+00:00): Hallo Suerlaenner,

diesen und andere Änderungssätze von dir müssen wir leider in Kürze wieder zurücksetzen. Open-Data heißt nicht, dass es für OSM legal verwendbar ist. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56709

Bitte verwende weiterhin den DOP40-Dienst und nach dessen Abschaltung am 1. Februar 2017 die Bing-Bilder.

Viele Grüße

Michael
SomeoneElse (2017-01-29 23:29:23+00:00): Hello,
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4616595390 really a car shop or is it just where you parked your car in Chichester?
Best Regards,
Andy
Thomas Pavenzinger (2017-01-30 04:23:25+00:00): Yes, sorry i just park my car there.
Hjart (2017-01-18 18:57:22+00:00): Jeg bliver altså nødt til at slette denne her parallelsti du har lavet.
AshlyAsh (2017-01-18 22:09:12+00:00): Det er ok, at du har valgt at slette parallestien, men jeg synes det er en fejl, at du har valgt, at genoprette den som en cykelsti, da det er en vandre-/cykelsti og derfor bør den afmærkes som sti.
Hjart (2017-01-18 22:41:35+00:00): Betegnelserne for de forskellige stityper i iD er efter min opfattelse ikke alt for heldige (og det kunne godt være jeg skulle forsøge at få dem rettet). Jeg vurderer stien som værende primært en asfalteret cykelsti. Bemærk at det i DK er tilladt at vandre på cykelstier (medmindre der er en gangsti ved siden) og at store dele af stien ovenikøbet er tagget foot=yes (f.eks. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47366483). Bemærk iøvrigt at eksemplet er del af ikke mindre end 7 forskellige cykel- og vandre-ruterelationer.
AshlyAsh (2017-01-18 23:13:13+00:00): Dette trafikskilt er på det meste af ruten http://koerekort-guiden.dk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/F%C3%A6llessti1.jpg derfor er det en kombineret gå-/cykelsti
Hjart (2017-01-19 08:43:28+00:00): Det accepterer jeg. Bemærk dog at stien ,som den er nu, i praksis også er tagget således, selvom teksten i iD (online editoren som du har benyttet) måske ikke helt antyder dette.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-29 15:48:38+00:00): Hallo Jojo4u,

bin gerade über deine Änderung gestolpert. Laut wiki sollte amenity=parking_space nur zusammen mit amenity=parking verwendet werden. Also um den ganzen Parking eine Linie mit amenity=parking und dann die einzelnen Stellplätze mit amenity=parking_space mappen. Wollte dich nur darauf aufmerksam machen ;-) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-29 15:48:53+00:00): betrifft z. B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466965507
freebeer (2018-06-22 11:19:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60072770 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam
Владимир К (2017-01-19 06:16:18+00:00): без "магазин" надо
az09 (2019-04-05 11:32:51+00:00): stop vandalism!
Klaus51067 (2017-01-19 19:47:40+00:00): Wechsel aus eigener Kenntnis. Schreibweise überprüft. (vor Ort)
chillly (2017-01-18 18:57:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

Is the name of that mud Lavender Wharf? You are the third new mapper in a few minutes all adding mud / beach to the banks of et Thames. Is there something going on?
chillly (2017-01-18 18:54:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

Is there really a beach there? It looks like a muddy tidal foreshore to me. You are the third new editor in a few minutes all adding beaches to the Thames. What is going on?
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-18 20:01:41+00:00): Hi AllenYu, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
AllenYu (2017-01-29 21:39:12+00:00): Yes please remove this edit too, thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-30 16:52:48+00:00): ok, reverted by http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45657520
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-18 20:01:19+00:00): Hi AllenYu, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
AllenYu (2017-01-24 20:41:40+00:00): Yes please remove this edit.
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-25 19:59:59+00:00): reverted http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45488511
mueschel (2017-01-21 19:56:53+00:00): Here is another new way with strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466974600
piligab (2017-01-21 20:21:31+00:00): Hi Mueschel.
I proceeded to change the tags. Thanks for your feedback.
Regards.
oba510 (2017-01-19 09:12:40+00:00): Are you sure these service roads you added open to the public?  They're on a military base and you can see a gate and concrete barriers visible in the bing aerial.
ridixcr (2017-01-20 17:15:45+00:00): Hi Oba510,
Thank you for notifying me about this issue. I have reverted my changes and the changes can be found here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45299888. I will be more careful with my edits. Thanks again.
geri-oc (2017-02-21 13:15:46+00:00): Beide "Gebäude" sollten "man_made=brigde" werden. Siehe auch:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57437
user_7622 (2017-02-21 16:38:25+00:00): So wie ich das Gesamtbild im Forum deute, ist wohl doch eher tunnel=culvert für den Durchlass passend? Dann entfiele auch das 'Gebäude'.
geri-oc (2017-02-21 18:14:02+00:00): Ein Teil der user ist für culvert. Wer es im deutschen WIKI mit foot ergänzt hat ist falsch - ist in keinem anderem WIKI dokumentiert. Ich bin für man_made=tunnel - detailiert - auch wenn es Mapnik (noch) nicht rendert. War bei man_made=brigde ja lange Zeit auch so.
GarryX3D (2017-02-21 19:39:40+00:00): Bedauerlich, dass sich der Trend zu "building" für alle Bauwerke in den letzten Jahren wohl doch wieder mehr zu einer Splittung zwischen man_made und building für Gebäude gewandelt hat. Ein Oberbegriff für alle Bauwerke der dann feiner untergliedert wird hätte ich für sinnvoller empfunden (Nein, Straßenbelag würde für mich nicht darunter fallen).
AgusQui (2017-01-23 15:17:27+00:00): Por favor tenga más cuidado con sus ediciones, borró la siguiente bajada de la General Paz: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299487023/history. Tenga en cuenta que las imágenes de Bing de la zona son de 2013, si no conoce la zona no se guíe por éstas imágenes por favor.
Te-Ika (2017-01-23 15:45:55+00:00): AgusQui, 
I have reviewed your link and I can't seem to find the object in question. Could you send another link that has the object highlighted so that I can review it please. When I work on maps in OSM I am using video that was taken from the ground to verify the edits that I make to OSM so I would like to make sure I didn't add something I cannot verify on that video.
Te-Ika (2017-01-23 16:11:16+00:00): Apologies could you send a link of the area or an object nearby.
Te-Ika (2017-01-23 16:47:08+00:00): Nevermind I believe I found the object in question. here is a a link to a screen shot took in JOSM of the data that I was looking at when I made that edit. https://www.flickr.com/photos/151468848@N08/31640582994/in/dateposted-public/  
I do not have an view of that area to make the edits my self could you add anything that is missing please.
AgusQui (2017-01-23 23:30:13+00:00): Aquí hay otro error grave, toda la zona está desactualizada respecto a Bing, los 2 puentes que se ven en las imágenes fueron demolidos y construidos nuevamente más hacia el sur, además se cambió todos los enlaces de la zona, estaban correctamente mapeados antes de su intervención: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350697806#map=16/-34.6190/-58.5303
AgusQui (2017-01-23 23:57:29+00:00): Esta intersección también fue remodelada, ya no es como se ve en las imágenes de Bing: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466948657#map=17/-34.56984/-58.50937
Te-Ika (2017-01-24 19:45:49+00:00): Okay I apologize again for making incorrect edits, thank you for checking my work and assuring that it matches what is actually on the ground.
trigpoint (2017-01-18 19:23:13+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. This edit looks very odd, what is the source you are using. 
It seems very odd to map mud around jettys.
Also please could you use meaningful changeset comments describing what you have done so that other mappers know what you are intending. #thamesmapathon tells us nothing.
Thanks Phil
MMN-o (2017-01-21 02:06:44+00:00): Hello and thanks for your edits in Umeå!

It seems however that this changeset (and maybe others) place many ways offset a little bit. This can happen when someone "correct" positions of ways according to the underlying map. Unfortunately however Bing, Mapbox etc. are not perfect - sometimes they have up to tens of meters of incorrectness. Usually due to terrain or the result of photography perspective.

Please make sure you align the background map according to existing shapes (buildings at the base, or GPX traces which can be enabled in the web browser editor iD that you use).

For example, I walked along some of those paths in Hedlundadungen to get a good GPX record and those traces can be used for aligning.
EneaSuper (2017-01-18 19:43:07+00:00): Interessante, dove hai reperito questi dati? :o
chillly (2017-01-18 19:31:37+00:00): This edit looks a bit odd. There doesn't look to be any beach there - it looks like tidal mud to me. Adding the name ('tidal beach') is a really bad idea. That is not the name of the mud, so please don't name it.

This is part of a mapathon. I hope the organiser is checking all this stuff
SK53 (2017-01-18 20:12:56+00:00): This is tidal mud, I've gazed at it many times from the London Apprentice.
ecatmur (2017-02-21 13:23:14+00:00): Hi,

I've removed this area of tidal sand as the area above the Embankment wall is dry/paved. I took a look on OS StreetView imagery layer and can't see any evidence of tidal sand between the Embankment and Westminster pier. Happy to discuss if you intend re-adding it.
opendcc (2017-01-18 20:03:48+00:00): Hallo,

es wäre hilfreich, wenn ein Edit lokal beschränkt ist und über ganz D und I hinweg geht. Danke.
NGL-engel (2017-01-22 20:22:13+00:00): Hallo, 
   will ich gerne machen.
Muss ich dann die Änderungen lokal sammeln und dann immer erst speichern. Und erst danach in einen anderen Bereich wechseln? Oder wie handhabt man das am Besten?
 Gruß
opendcc (2017-01-22 20:29:47+00:00): Hallo,
einfach vor dem Wechsel in einen anderen Bereich speichern. Das Problem an großen Bereichen: viele hier checken ihr 'Stammrevier' auf Änderungen. Und da geht so ein Bereich einfach drüber - aber hat lokal nichts verändert.

Servus
NGL-engel (2017-01-23 20:50:23+00:00): Ok, Danke. 
Hatte ich nicht gewußt. Sorry. Sollte aber in Zukunft kein Problem sein.