piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2017-07-12 07:44:42+00:00): Hallo AlexanderDu hast am Feld- / Radweg Berg - Griesingen foot=yes und bicycle=yes ergänzt. Der Weg ist korrekt als "track" (Feldweg) erfaßt. Dies beinhaltet bereits, daß dort auch Fußgänger und Radfahrer erlaubt sind. Dies kannst Du hier nachschauen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany.
Ich habe diese Eingaben daher wieder gelöscht. Dein Eintrag lcn=yes für eine ausgeschilderte Radroute dürfte dagegen korrekt sein.
Noch ein Willkommen bei OSM
Grüße
Alexander ZettPunkt (2017-07-13 14:53:31+00:00): Hallo und danke für das feedback. Mein Ziel war es in erster Linie diesen Weg für opencycle maps klarer aufzuzeigen, weil es wie du richtig sagst ein offizieller Radweg ist. Dies ist leider immernoch nicht der Fall. Passt das mit lcn=yes und man muss nur noch auf den sync warten?

Grüße
Alex
PT-53 (2017-07-13 16:27:54+00:00): Ob lcn=yes für eine Anzeige als Radstrecke in der OpenCycleMap ausreicht, weis ich nicht. Vielleicht werden auch nur Radrouten (Relationen mit type=route und route=bicycle - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route) angezeigt.
Es kann aber auch gut sein, daß Du noch etwas auf das nächste Update der Daten in OpenCycleMap warten mußt.
.
Ein Radweg im Sinne der STVO ist das aber nicht. Dort steht nirgends ein Verkehrsschild Nr. 240 (Siehe: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=240). Ich kann auf meinen Fotos auch keine Hinweisschilder für eine Radroute (analog Donauradweg - lcn=yes) erkennen.
Grüße
TourenbikerFKB (2017-07-13 18:18:53+00:00): lcn=yes reicht aus, um sich in der opencycle-map eine farbige Markierung zu verdienen. Z.B. hier

http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=18/50.50507/9.69574

Es dauert immer nur einige Zeit, bis die Karte auktualisiert wird.
Spanholz (2017-11-28 07:44:35+00:00): Why did you add an acess=no to the road? Why did you changed it to a footway?
Calvin Reavis (2017-11-28 14:19:23+00:00): Although most maps of camp creek SP and SF show the label "road and trail"  the official website classifies them as trails with trail descriptions https://wvstateparks.com/park/camp-creek-state-park-and-forest/  Should I be in error please feel free to revert back to roads (probably with no motor vehicle access)   Kindest regards. C
Spanholz (2017-11-29 09:59:40+00:00): I changed it a little bit. You can now drive to the campsite on Camp Creek Road but all other ways I changed to highway=track or highway=path. I will investigate a little bit to make the tagging more precise. 

Have fun mapping! :)
BCNorwich (2017-07-15 07:37:36+00:00): Hello there, I'd just like to point out that for the way south from Ham you have mapped two ways (a highway=bridleway and a highway=unclassified). You've also tagged the access as (in parts) private, yes, permissive. 
Your new way does not join with Ham Road, and the highway=road close to Ham Road, (which should be highway=service), does not join up to anything.
Regards Bernard
user_5126797 (2017-07-15 08:21:51+00:00): The road south from Ham is a permissive bridleway on both a private  and public road.
BCNorwich (2017-07-15 13:24:07+00:00): Hi, yes I can see that but you have drawn two roads/highways, one on top of the other. Between the road junction at Ham and your mapped permissive bridleway which goes eastwards. The manner to map this is to consolidate all relevant tags on just one highway. 
To have two highways one on top of the other at the same layer/level is incorrect.

I see you've joined the new way to Ham Road, thanks. The short road/highway going into the property west of the duplicated way is not joined to either of the duplicated ways.
Regards Bernard
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-11 19:51:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49922346
DaveF (2022-03-23 00:31:56+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477777921/history
Which of these is correct? skatepark or water feature?
RaccoonFederation (2022-03-23 01:28:13+00:00): I'm not sure. It's used as a skate park but may be a man made water basin. There's no water there currently.
szalona_entropia (2017-07-11 18:32:45+00:00): A na pewno to jest otwarte?
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-11 19:39:27+00:00): I re-added Palestinian ruins that were deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50172437
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-11 19:52:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50181414
PT-53 (2017-12-17 09:49:19+00:00): Hallo degernfelder,
in keep right werden für die Kläranlage Friedrichshafen diese Fehlerhinweise angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=47.64868&lon=9.50709&zoom=17&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C180%2C191%2C193%2C195%2C196%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C20
.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
.
Grüße
mueschel (2017-07-16 13:11:36+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag "access:coach =discouraged" in this changeset. This tag has not been used in other places yet. 
I guess the common tag "tourist_bus = discouraged" is what you want to use here?

Cheers, Jan
gurglypipe (2017-07-29 11:13:46+00:00): Not really. The tagging is meant to reflect a road sign which says “Not suitable for coaches”. The tagging documentation I was following is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddiscouraged.
mueschel (2017-07-29 12:40:46+00:00): 'access:' is never a part of those keys. And osm knows two types of busses: bus and tourist_bus. Both are described on the wiki page you linked to.  The 'discouraged' part is perfectly fine.
gurglypipe (2017-07-29 13:04:36+00:00): I was following the example of `access:bicycle=yes` (from that page). I guess the intention of the road sign could be encoded as `bus=discouraged`, `tourist_bus=discouraged`? The sign is probably more targeting the length and wheel base of the vehicles rather than their use as PSVs or multi-person vehicles.
mueschel (2017-07-29 14:07:38+00:00): I don't know why this is listed there. The correct tag is 'bicycle' and is used 10000 times more often (300 vs 3 million uses)
gurglypipe (2017-07-29 16:23:55+00:00): OK, changed to bus=discouraged tourist_bus=discouraged in changeset #50675680. I’m not sure if I got all the instances of it, since I can’t get overpass to list any access:coach instances. (I’m obviously using it wrongly.)
mueschel (2017-07-29 16:41:19+00:00): Goto overpass-turbo.eu, Open the wizard and type 'access:coach=* global', click run.  There is nothing left.
gurglypipe (2017-07-30 08:07:26+00:00): Great, thanks
5m4u9 (2017-07-12 02:28:28+00:00): hola, gracias por las ediciones!

si escoges una categoria ya no es necesario escribir ésa categoria en el nombre del lugar... por ejemplo: "farmacia pepito", si escoges el tipo farmacia en el nombre solo añadir "pepito"
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-07-11 21:39:43+00:00): o que é isso? voce criou duas cafeterias que parecem nao existir.
elgolfo (2017-08-16 17:10:54+00:00): Hey, I'm pretty sure that there is no chalet in the woods. What do you wanted to map there?
JJIglesias (2023-02-17 21:43:54+00:00): Saludos Marco Antonio, en la zona del Sajama creaste varios natural=hot_spring, en lugares que parecen ser casas rurales o especificamente son corrales de piedras en esas mismas casas rurales. La pregunta es si estas seguro q esos son hot_springs o te parecieron q lo era? obviamente las imagenes disponibles ahora son mucho mejores q eran hace 5 años.
Gracias
JJ
5m4u9 (2023-02-17 22:42:49+00:00): Hola, no recuerdo bien, pero creo que en el que todavía está mapeado (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4964258944), el hot_spring esmás bien un natural=spring, pero me dijeron que aparecía y desaparecía dada la cercanía de otros manatiales.
JJIglesias (2023-02-17 22:52:11+00:00): Ya, eso me parece mas viable, q sea spring en vez de hot_spring.
Gracias
RicoElectrico (2017-07-13 09:58:39+00:00): To się nadaje do poprawy, bo atrakcja to nie jest, ale coś tu raczej jest: http://slubice-polenmarkt.de/polenmarkt-swinemuende/
eggie (2017-07-11 18:34:23+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-11 18:41:55+00:00): info op BAG adresnode nr 30 gezet.. anders 2 adressen hier. Website toegevoegd. De aard van de praktijk "moet" er ook nog op. Zie kaarteigenschappen in welkomstmail.
eggie (2017-07-11 18:50:11+00:00): 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dtherapist
 office=therapist
karitotp (2017-07-11 20:44:34+00:00): Hi BortSimpson, these highways have some kinks, could you please fix them? Thank you
Karito
BortSimpson (2017-07-11 20:49:42+00:00): sure, how is it now?
karitotp (2017-07-11 21:24:59+00:00): looks good! thank you.
BortSimpson (2017-07-11 21:34:36+00:00): how are kinks like that created without nodes? can they only be made through imported data?
Yury Yatsynovich (2018-06-09 23:44:38+00:00): По названиям улиц -- "улица Ленина", но "Цветочная улица"
rab (2017-07-11 18:57:36+00:00): Yes there  are missing buildings on the spot. But this new buildings are intersecting previously drawn buildings, due to uncorrected imagery offset.
http://learnosm.org/en/josm/correcting-imagery-offset/
See also task instructions:
http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/3286
It is by the way about buildings in Mali . :)
Your Village Maps (2018-05-28 02:50:15+00:00): I am not local in Binghamton (I'm in Denver) but the best information I've seen shows that I-86 presently ends at the cloverleaf-like interchange at the SE corner of this changeset.  Apparently once the Mount Prospect (Prospect Mountain?) Interchange is rebuilt, NY 17 will get the I-86 shield along this stretch (not sure how far west though). Could you double-check?
Roadsguy (2018-05-28 21:05:22+00:00): Upon further investigation, you're right that the bulk of this segment isn't I-86 yet. Current signage at the I-81-NY 17 interchange to the east indicates that the I-86  section starts there heading east, but doesn't go any farther west. There is also no signage of I-86 immediately west of Binghamton, though new signage at the Prospect Mountain interchange does include I-86 everywhere, making for weird, spotty signage. The NY 7 interchange signage also features I-86, but only going west from it across the bridge.
Your Village Maps (2018-05-28 21:20:15+00:00): Do you live in the area? I have a friend who lives over the state line in PA who sometimes goes up to Binghamton. And I've been recently trying to update things around there as the construction project continues. This started with an email I read on the OSM-US mailing list. Are you aware of what I'm talking about?
enedaniel (2017-07-11 21:03:29+00:00): See ei ole vea eemaldamine kui sa lihtsalt andmeid kustutad.
Miks sa andmed "roof:levels" ära kustutasid???
Kui sa tahad, vöid ju "height" tegeleda, aga mitte teiste tööd lihtsalt hävitada.
Palun tee oma "Tehtud töö" tegematuks.
Ma oleksin sulle tänulik kui sa oma asjadega tegeleksid! Kuna sa siin alles väga uus oled, ära tee midagi sellist, milles sa sada protsenti kindel ei ole.
tambre (2017-07-12 07:40:26+00:00): Vabandust. "roof:levels" tagid ma taastan. Need said eemaldatud kuna sattusin segadusse.
enedaniel (2017-07-12 17:26:31+00:00): Bitte alle gelöschten Daten wieder herstellen! Auch "building:levels" wiederherstellen!
Sachdaten zu löschen ist kein "Fixen"(beheben) von Fehlern!!!
Palun köik kustutatud andmed taastada, ka "building:levels" !!
Andmeid kustutada ei ole vigade körvaldamine!!!
tambre (2017-07-12 18:27:40+00:00): Revertisin kogu selle changeseti.
enedaniel (2017-07-13 14:47:34+00:00): Vielen Dank!
mavl (2017-07-12 17:02:10+00:00): Здравствуйте. В названии допущена опечатка. Также в названии лучше всего оставить только слово "Менделеевец". А название категории перенести в какой-нибудь другой тег. Например,  
official_name=Спортивный комплекс «Менделеевец». Указывать категорию в названии не нужно, потому что категория уже указана с помощью тега leisure=sports_centre
mavl (2017-07-12 16:29:47+00:00): Здравствуйте. Для дома культуры нужно добавить тег amenity=community_centre.  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre  
  
Также лучше в названии не писать "ДК". В названии должно быть только название.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre  
  
Полное название можно указать в теге official_name. Например, official_name=Дом культуры «Железнодорожник»
mavl (2017-07-12 16:30:27+00:00): Правильная ссылка о названиях:  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
mavl (2017-07-12 17:06:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не указана улица у дома. В этом случае навигаторы и сайты не найдут этот дом по его адресу. Для улиц используется тег addr:street.
DaveF (2017-07-11 21:05:56+00:00): Hi
This is an automated edit. Have you discussed this on any OSM forum?
tambre (2017-07-12 05:37:28+00:00): This wasn't an automated edit. I went through everything manually.
DaveF (2017-07-12 08:57:08+00:00): Your changeset was open for just 6 seconds.
tambre (2017-07-12 09:29:00+00:00): After some Googling about how changesets works, it seems my editor (JOSM) simply uploads all changes at once by default. As for the 6 seconds, it seems roughly like the time it would take me to upload a changeset of this size. Should I in future figure out how to avoid uploading everything at once? Documentation of JOSM tells me that uploading everything at once is the recommended way.
SomeoneElse (2017-07-12 10:08:10+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
There are a few reasons why automated edits such as this one need to be discussed.
One is to give people who are using the "old" tagging chance to change to the "new" tagging.  Without any kind of warning, features will disappear from downstream maps and datasets with no warning.
Another is that the tagging of these objects may be incorrect.  I'd argue that for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450900122/history needs a tag to say what it is, not just what sport is associated with it.  It's true that the tagging needs to be improved here, but an automated edit that removes potention problems from QA tools is not the way to fix it.
I've reverted this.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2017-07-12 10:11:07+00:00): For more info, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .
rab (2017-07-11 20:35:27+00:00): overlapping buildings!!!
Hjart (2017-07-11 19:27:21+00:00): Both "to" ways are pedestrian, so I would think that these restrictions are a bit superfluous, right?
Hjart (2017-07-11 19:44:10+00:00): In cases like this I usually prefer creating an only_straight_on restriction. Makes more sense to me and in some cases avoids creating multiple no_right/left_turn restrictions
user_4547543 (2017-07-11 19:50:35+00:00): as long as the routing works the same way for our purposes I dont have a problem with it, Thank you for the correction
FredrikLindseth (2017-07-12 13:33:14+00:00): Are you sure there is an outdoor shop here and not just a Biltema?
ashleyannmathew (2017-09-19 05:39:23+00:00): Hi, Could you please verify if the parking way be marked as tunnel=passageway or covered=yes with layer=1? Reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel#tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage
PT-53 (2017-07-12 07:16:14+00:00): Hallo Jo89195,
wieso hast Du dieses Gebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311885692) verschoben ? Dieses war von mir anhand Maps4BW lagegenau eingezeichnet worden!
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-07-12 07:18:58+00:00): Auch die Verschiebung des Weidenweg ist falsch !
Jo89195 (2017-07-19 18:58:11+00:00): Wie mache ich das rückgängig? Woher erkenne ich ob etwas anhand von Maps4BW lagegenau eingezeichnet worden ist?
PT-53 (2017-08-27 08:46:53+00:00): Hallo Jo89195,
wirklich erkennen kannst Du das nur, wenn Du selbst Maps4BW nutzt. Dazu müßtest Du aber den Editor JOSM nutzen, da Maps4BW nur dort als Hintergrundbild eingeblendet werden kann.
JOSM verlang am Anfang etwas mehr Einarbeitung, dafür kann JOSM aber wesentlich mehr als ID und enthält auch den besseren Validator, der mehr Fehler abfängt.
JOSM-Wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:JOSM/Guide
Maps4BW-Wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW

Deine Änderungen habe ich teilweise wieder berichtigt.

Bitte entschuldige noch die späte Antwort.
Grüße

Bitte entschuldige
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-07-14 19:11:32+00:00): fiz uma mera alteração no que diz respeito a norma contra abreviações

https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?act=url&depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=en&sp=nmt4&tl=pt-BR&u=https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names&usg=ALkJrhjQze21RN6HYTnyhhpbtgGhv6v5ig#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
aureozb (2017-07-16 21:00:13+00:00): eu aqui não consigo ver a tua alteração
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-07-18 16:39:50+00:00): o conjunto de mudanças foi este:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50291458 

logo abaixo da secção de discussão desta pagina encontraras as alterações que correspondem a esse conjunto de mudanças, onde os cabeçalhos são linhas (ways) e nós (nodes), se clicares na hiperligação 'Direcção de Logística do Ministério do Interior (MININT) (369574191, v3))' > e depois clicares no 'ver histórico' (view history) no fim daquela pagina,  levará-te para uma pagina onde podes ver todas as alterações que foram feitas para aquela Linha (way), as diferenças entre um conjunto de mudanças para outra sao as alterações que foram feitas, também podes consultar utilizando o overpass-api: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50291458
SomeoneElse (2017-07-12 10:14:09+00:00): Hello,
Did you discuss the changes to these objects with the OSM communities concerned, and with the people who originally added them?
I'd be interested to know how you verified these changes without any source.
Best Regards,
Andy
tambre (2017-07-12 10:59:26+00:00): I did not verify nor discuss with the relevant OSM communities (no idea this was something one should do). As stated by the changeset comment, I simply re-tagged from deprecated to non-deprecated ones. Feel free to revert.
PT-53 (2019-07-13 06:07:42+00:00): Hallo  Jo89195,
im OSM-Inspector wird für diesen Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/319878879/history ein Hinweis "no_feature_tag_nodes" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.80129&lat=48.17246&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=no_feature_tag_nodes,no_feature_tag_ways
Gibt es den Geflügelhof Wegerer überhaupt noch?
Wenn nicht, sollte der Eintrag gelöscht werden. Wenn doch, kannst Du Dir hier mal ein Beispiel für einen Geflügelhof ansehen:
OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321002385
Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66760
Schaust du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Jo89195 (2019-07-14 20:28:40+00:00): Als ich hier vor 2 Jahren vor Ort war gab es den Geflügelhof Werner als Geschäft nicht mehr, das Gebäude war aber (durch Beschriftung) noch so gekennzeichnet. Ob das immer noch so ist müsste man erneut begutachten.
PT-53 (2019-07-15 07:35:39+00:00): Hallo Jo89195, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Auch wenn "Geflügelhof Wegerer"noch am Gebäude stehen sollte, ist das nicht der Name des Gebäudes sondern der Firma. Da die Firma - wie Du schreibst - nicht mehr besteht, habe ich den Name-Eintrag jetzt gelöscht.
Grüße
eggie (2017-07-11 20:16:28+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-07-11 23:25:29+00:00): Boa noite, suas edições serão revertidas, o openstreetmap não deve ser utilizado para este fim.
eggie (2017-07-11 20:20:38+00:00): Alleen een naam is niet voldoende. Ook de aard van de instelling taggen. Zie wiki kaarteigenschappen welkomstmail.
office=yes?
PIvB (2017-07-11 20:56:43+00:00): Heb nog even naar mijn aanpassing gekeken. Ik heb echter geen idee welke 'aard' ik zou moeten toevoegen. Is dat soms: dienstverlening of personal coaching? Vind dat soort omschrijvingen die de aard weergeven niet terug bij de keuzemogelijkheden.
eggie (2017-07-11 21:25:52+00:00): Het moet in ieder geval een internationale term zijn. Kijk anders ook nog even in de Engelse wiki... of maak bij zoeken een zoekslag naar iets als coaching.
eggie (2017-07-11 21:36:40+00:00): 'k Zie het er ook niet zo bij.
Met aard bedoel ik zoiets als shop=chemist of amenity=doctors, office=commercial
Sommige tags geven een icoon op de kaart. 
 
Vraag het even op het forum...
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Zelfde inlog als osm account.
literan (2017-07-21 23:44:41+00:00): не надо вандалить.
DaveF (2017-07-20 15:54:52+00:00): Hi
I'm adding NCN4 relation to the new roundabout. Were any cycle lanes included in the construction an were the feeder lanes as short as you've mapped them??
trigpoint (2017-07-20 18:11:29+00:00): There are no cycle lanes, feeder lanes are short as mapped. They are traced from gps.
trigpoint (2017-07-20 19:33:11+00:00): I was there last week. I have fixed it, and the Atlantic Coast Route, now to try to fix the bus routes and the slashed road names :)

I had added the roundabout whilst there, but the relations were too big for my laptop/mobile connection
eggie (2017-07-11 20:21:37+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-11 20:28:51+00:00): Ik heb het pad even verbonden met de Jacoba van Beierenweg.. Het zat nog los.
arvdk (2017-11-09 11:13:12+00:00): "Reaching out to more experienced mappers."
Hi, welcome, I saw your note. It does need some polishing, but good start.
Some comment:
- name=Tullp (car parking) -> if its a regular car parking going with the street, do not name it. If it's locally known as the Tullp car parking, you can name it. Besides, I think you made a spell error.
- A highway=path means bicycles and pedestrians can use it. If the path isn't in a area with lots of walking routes of mountainbike routes, tags like incline=0%, mtb:scale and trail_visibility can be left out. Only surface, width and if it's lit or not, might be interesting. For now, I will 'polish' it.
Keep up the good work.
PT-53 (2017-07-12 07:29:59+00:00): Hallo Jo89195,
auch in diesem Änderungssatz ist Du Gebäude verschoben. Warum verschiebst Du dann nicht gleiche alle Gerbäude ?
chillly (2017-07-18 11:22:36+00:00): This is a stadium, but it's also a building. It needs the building tag. I'm adding a building tag.
PT-53 (2017-07-12 07:25:44+00:00): Hallo Jo89195,
leider stellt auch Deine Änderung am Verlauf der Kirchstraße in Unterstadion eine Verschlechterung dar. Ist Dir bekannt, daß die Bing-Luftbilder immer einen gewissen Versatz aufweisen ?
Grüße
Miselajus (2017-07-11 21:14:30+00:00): Hallo, du hast bei deinen Wegeergänzungen auch einen Weg gelöscht. Ist das korrekt oder war das ein Versehen? Gruß M.
sgclimber (2017-07-11 21:18:01+00:00): Ja ich hab ein Teilstück gelöscht da der Verlauf falsch war bzw. das Stück seit Jahren nicht mehr existiert. Gruß Stefan
kreuzschnabel (2017-07-21 09:28:13+00:00): Bei dieser Bearbeitung hast du der Abbiegevorschrift https://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/6013698 beide Schenkel ausgerissen. Von wo nach wo darf man da nur rechts abbiegen? Dann bau ich die wieder ein.
Miselajus (2017-07-11 21:15:06+00:00): Hallo, du hast bei deinen Wegeergänzungen auch einen Weg gelöscht. Ist das korrekt oder war das ein Versehen? Gruß M.
GerdP (2017-09-10 08:51:19+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
You tried to map a roundabout here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351718190
using highway=turning_loop
This tag is only meant for nodes, when you don't want to draw the circular way itself. You should use junction=roundabout for a real roundabout. See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop
and
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Circular_and_widened_road_features
GerdP (2017-10-20 08:17:23+00:00): Please review my changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53090851