piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 13:56:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123690116 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reporting some malicious edits in Iraq
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 13:56:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123690116 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reporting some malicious edits in Iraq
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 13:56:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123690116 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reporting some malicious edits in Iraq
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 13:56:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123690116 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reporting some malicious edits in Iraq
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 13:56:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123690116 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reporting some malicious edits in Iraq
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 13:56:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123690116 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reporting some malicious edits in Iraq
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 13:56:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123690116 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reporting some malicious edits in Iraq
Dodko (2022-06-10 19:50:43+00:00): Poštu ste zmenili na poštovú schránku, pošta tam bola zrušená?
Joseph R P (2022-06-12 05:49:52+00:00): Those are some really beautiful ramp curves (not sure if you're using a certain plugin or tool to make them since I don't use JOSM that much, but I admire them nonetheless), but I do recommend keeping the smooth curves up past the painted gore where the ramp becomes a merge/exit lane, like how most are mapped in the US, to prevent the ramps from appearing as sharp turns like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122186096#map=18/41.36828/-72.11514

There isn't any official consensus on how ramps should be mapped but it's been quite widely accepted to have ramps merge into/spur off of roads pre your ramp adjustments, however it's not much of a priority.
jnighan (2022-06-12 12:58:16+00:00): Thanks for the feedback! The curves are made using the Splines plugin. Regarding exits, my mapping is based on the documented guidance that roads are not to mapped as separate ways "if the two directions are only separated by paint." As a result, I decided that ramps are not actually separate ways until the gore becomes physically impassible (e.g., grass, raised concrete, etc.). What are your thoughts?
Joseph R P (2022-06-12 16:41:17+00:00): In my opinion, there are some painted gores that matter, such as the ones between highways and ramps, as well as slip lanes with a painted gore (instead of the usual concrete or grass one) that have different traffic control from the road it comes off of (such as a yield sign whereas the intersection is signalized). I think the rule not to map separate ways "if the two directions are only separated by paint" mainly refers to when it's a two-way road with a painted line, median, or turn lane, so including the painted gores with the physical barrier should be fine.

I include painted gores with the ramp separation with the reasoning being that cars should not drive over them whereas a car can drive over a centerline to make a left turn onto a driveway or cross over a solid white exit lane marker to make a right exit.

It really all comes down to mapping style, because some people will map the ramp all the way down the merge/exit lane and some people will map the lane as its own way regardless of whether there's a slip way ahead or if it's just a standard left/right turn lane.

I'm not sure if there's a documentation or proposal on how turn lanes should be mapped standardly, and if there isn't one yet, for the time being it all comes down to what looks best in your opinion.
Dodko (2022-06-10 19:53:10+00:00): Bytový dom sa značí značkou
building=apartments
a nie názvom Bytový dom, ten cudzincovi nič nepovie.
Patr1k_P (2022-06-12 10:25:11+00:00): preco si tu zmazal tieto znacky?

amenity=place_of_worship 
religion=christian
Milan Gr (2022-06-12 12:55:43+00:00): Nie som si vedomý, že by som ich úmyselne mazal... ak sa tak stalo, tak určite omylom.... už som ich doplnil...
Dodko (2022-06-10 19:56:07+00:00): Podľa katastra je adresa tej budovy 403 a 37 čo ste napísali patrí susednej budove.
Dodko (2022-06-10 19:57:25+00:00): https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13809298?pos=49.044694,21.015979,18

https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/816086/2_2?pos=49.044696,21.015990,20
chris66 (2024-07-06 07:48:53+00:00): Hi, warum ist die Linie "Eckwarder Sieltief" als river, der Umriss jedoch als canal gemappt?
Hb- (2024-07-06 15:32:10+00:00): Die Linie wurde vor neun Jahren geändert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27917371

Schwierig ist die Handhabung der Gefälleverhältnisse/Fließrichtungen, weil einige Gewässer dort sowohl be- als auch entwässern.
redd (2022-06-12 14:12:35+00:00): Hi dddos,
danke für deinen Beitrag. Ich glaube da ist ein Tippfehler bei "bramd:website" reingekommen
dddos (2022-07-04 13:05:05+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
Wurde zwischenzeitlich dankenswerterweise von mueschel bereits korrigiert.
doubledd3 (2022-06-24 04:45:12+00:00): That's a fascinating forest clearing on Luecke Farm.  The letters are 4020 meters or about 2.5 miles across.
willkmis (2022-06-10 13:44:41+00:00): Hi Anthony, if you take a look at the history of this way, you'll see it's gone back and forth between trunk and motorway. Eventually, we decided to adhere to the CA-wide standard of where the "End Freeway" sign is (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/Map_features). Here, that sign is at Lincoln: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9523487423. Moreover, this segment has a very low speed limit for a motorway (45 mph). Did you have a reason to upgrade this segment back to motorway?
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-06-11 04:06:05+00:00): Hey friends, your edit is non-sense so I revert it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122233842
兄弟，不要在地图上胡画，我给你回退了，下次注意
欢迎加群t.me/osmchina
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122187804
Allison P (2022-06-10 22:12:50+00:00): Please don't add house numbers in Ada County. They are already all on the map, they just aren't attached to the buildings.
grammaticalerror (2022-06-11 01:44:45+00:00): Shouldn't they be attached?
Allison P (2022-06-11 01:51:29+00:00): Not necessarily, though I am working on it. However, that's a bit of a WIP, with ~50,000 already done but still probably over 150,000 to go. Adding them through SC just duplicates them.
grammaticalerror (2022-06-11 05:14:29+00:00): Fair enough. I've reverted the address changes.
willkmis (2022-06-10 13:48:07+00:00): Hello, when adding a shop to a building with multiple shops, it's better practice to add a node for the shop, rather than adding its tag to the whole building. Also, what is your source for these edits? I can't find anything on the web indicating there's a clothing shop by this name here.
Leonardo Moretti (2023-03-05 10:40:14+00:00): I know very well this way, I'm sure this is a track, as defined in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
It can be used by authorized vehicle too. Please revert the change, or if you prefer I can do it. Thank you
Potter_Gang (2023-06-09 10:11:03+00:00): Hi  Leonardo Moretti 
Thank you for your feedback, and I apologize for the delayed response. I've reverted the edit.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
afgb1977 (2024-11-29 01:51:42+00:00): Why is highway=residential used in a rural agricultural area?
Do you know the area?
NewryCanal (2024-12-04 03:11:51+00:00): Hello afgb1977, The editor Grasmere is no longer on our team so I will address your question on their behalf. The road at  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728101150 was likely reclassified as residential as it accesses settlements and the OSM wiki for highway=track states ”Roads used for access to permanent human settlements or facilities should generally not use this tag” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack). The road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/708831977 also appears to have settlements along it but I can understand why unclassified would be favorable here, as it represents mixed used roads. I am happy to defer to your edits and knowledge of the area here. Have a nice day!
afgb1977 (2024-12-04 06:49:15+00:00): Thank you for your reply.
The Colombian OpenStreetMap community would be grateful if in the future This type of mapping campaigns should be duly announced on one of the official communication channels (Telegram / Community) in order to be aware of the quality of the data that  want to add and/or modify.
We also invite you to first consult the Mapping Guide for Colombia, which is duly documented in the following link.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Guía_para_mapear
NewryCanal (2024-12-05 01:27:35+00:00): Our team has been actively engaged in projects in Colombia for several years, and the local community is well-acquainted with our presence. Our Community Lead, Teddy Ahlvin, has introduced himself on Telegram. Our previous Community Lead, Andrew Wiseman, has actively participated in numerous discussions on the Colombia OSM talk list Talk-co, which has been shared among Telegram participants. Additionally, information about our projects can be found on GitHub (https://github.com/osmlab/appledata/issues/43) and the Organized Editing wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Apple). These platforms provide further details on our ongoing projects in Colombia.

Our team is aware of the Colombia/Guide to Mapping you linked and consistently adhere to any local community policies outlined on the wiki. Given the building=house tags (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066141249 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728101150), the road  in question (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728101150 ) appears to align with the criteria for residential classification as outlined in the local wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear).

Since classification can be subjective and interpreted differently by various users, I will defer to your expertise in these cases. Thanks for the feedback!

Best regards,
NewryCanal
afgb1977 (2024-12-05 14:53:26+00:00): Hello.
A brief clarification on area classification in Colombia.For general purposes, Colombia is divided into 2 types of areas = urban and rural. Officially (MGN) it is divided into 3 =
- Cabecera Municipal (Municipal Headquarters)
- Centro Poblado (Population Center) 
- Rural Disperso (Rural Dispersed)
The first refers to the urban perimeter of any of the country's municipalities and districts.
The second describes small semi-urban populations in rural areas.
The third describes the rural areas that are the majority of the country and are different from the first two.
There is another unofficial category, which is the urban expansion zone, which corresponds to the borders between urban and rural areas, Areas where construction is carried out as a continuation of the municipality but remain rural areas until the POT reclassifies that area as urban. Cities and towns are constantly growing and expanding towards rural areas.
Although it is not properly explained in the mapping route for Colombia, highway=residential does not apply (N/A) for rural areas in the country, unless that road passes through Population Centers (Centros Poblados), This classification is duly identified in MGN and Divipola.
Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728101150
I can assure you that it is not highway=residential.
It is a small road that is on the border of urban expansion, this track leads to a farm.
I live in an apartment building less than 50 meters from the start of the track, as I cannot attach my images to this post I will use StreetView for illustrative purposes (Mapillary has no coverage).
https://maps.app.goo.gl/FF1dfrg7u5Cb8ac49?g_st=ac
This highway=track passes just behind a residential complex, it does not give access to the residential complex since its entrance is on another side.
If you give me an email or other means of contact that accepts sending photographs, I can send you all the photos you request of the area so you can verify whether it is true or not.
As you indicate, I have an advantage over armchair mappers and that is my local knowledge as I live in the area, in this particular case I am less than 50 meters from the start of the track.
Under the premise that a road is residential if it passes through houses, we should reclassify all roads in the country in rural and urban areas as highway=residential. Wherever you look there are houses along all the country roads.
afgb1977 (2024-12-05 15:54:33+00:00): https://t.me/osmco/19638/25360?single
https://t.me/osmco/19638/25361?single
afgb1977 (2024-12-05 17:02:45+00:00): https://t.me/osmco/19638/25367?single
https://t.me/osmco/19638/25368?single
NewryCanal (2024-12-05 17:08:28+00:00): Hello afgb1977,

Thank you for the detailed information regarding classification in Colombia. I appreciate your dedication to improving the data and want to reassure you that my team’s goal is to support and collaborate with the local community. Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728101150, thank you for adding ground level photographs, but I trust your perspective and the information you’ve shared generally on these types of roads. My intention in the original response was to justify the potential thought process of the inactive editor, Grasmere, in making the change from over two years ago. That said, I am happy to defer to your edits and knowledge here. I will keep your insight regarding classification in rural areas in mind as I edit moving forward and to be sure, I will pass on your insights to the rest of my team. Thanks again for your local knowledge of the area. That is important and very valuable to the map.

Have a nice day!
moje_konto (2022-06-10 12:38:12+00:00): W edycji zmieniono nazwę. Taka jest oficjalna spółki, dałbym ją do znacznika official_name, na szyldzie i w logo strony jest nazwa jaka była wpisana poprzednio.
Misha Boiarkin (2022-06-12 20:49:19+00:00): Indeed! I'm sorry, I canceled my edit, thanks for pointing that out!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122190532
moje_konto (2022-06-12 23:07:29+00:00): It's ok, but I thought you would just move that second name to official_name tag, maybe official company name would be useful to someone.

Both are correct, as on their website www.fiddex.pl/kontakt - the logo is that short name, and for official contact it's that longer one.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-10 13:06:54+00:00): Z tego co wiem to B-1 zakazuje też wjazd konno (to też pojazd)
Frans S (2022-09-16 10:51:45+00:00): Hello.  Please map tall buildings  over the roof and move them to their footprint. 
Best regards
Hb- (2022-06-10 11:08:26+00:00): Bitte keine Brücken anlegen, wo keine sind. Das Gewässer unter dem Alten Bahndamm war seit 2017 mit layer=-1 als tieferliegend gemappt, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467542530. Die Situation ist auch im Luftbild klar erkenntlich. 

Die falsche Brücke ist entfernt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122205500
Sandra Schallberger Härz fir Obwaldä (2024-04-19 10:16:58+00:00): Defi ist neu wieder im Eingang beim Haus 1 Looschä. 24 STd. zugänglich bitte anpassen
chnuessli (2024-04-19 14:09:57+00:00): Ist erledigt.
abakus_uploader (2022-06-10 22:32:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
BubbaJuice (2022-07-27 23:48:18+00:00): Hello Joseph,

Please do not map highway links with no physical barrier between it and the highway like you have done here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068397303. 

Thank you,
BubbaJuice
hsc666 (2022-06-12 11:46:17+00:00): Hallo Falk Heinen und willkommen bei OSM! 

Bitte befasse Dich mit den Grundlagen von OSM und damit, wie Dinge eingetragen werden. Die Ladestation hat keinen Eigennamen (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name) und hier steht genau beschrieben, wie Ladestationen eingetragen werden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=charging_station. Ich habe das gröbste (erneut) korrigiert. Da sind aber sicher noch einige Eigenschaften, die ergänzt werden können. Bei Fragen, kannst Du Dich gern hier (oder auch im Forum) melden.

VG
hsc666
Falk Heinen (2022-06-13 05:15:27+00:00): Hallo hsc666, 
vielen Dank für die Infos und die Hilfe. 
Ich habe anhand der verlinkten Dokumentationen noch weitere Eigenschaften eingetragen. 
VG
Falk
WoSoe (2022-06-10 10:40:25+00:00): Welche Bedeutung hat das Tag  »hight« an den Punkten?
Neb the B (2022-06-12 06:15:24+00:00): Ich habe mir die Höhe der Bordsteinkande vermerkt. Ich habe schon gesehen, dass dies falsch ist. Werde ich umändern.
user_5359 (2022-06-12 17:43:33+00:00): Bitte sieht Dir dazu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dkerb an (interessant ist auch, dass die Werte in METER angegeben werden)
Neb the B (2022-06-12 18:31:53+00:00): Jupp. Habe ich gesehen. Danke für die Info.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-24 09:01:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241497124/history - is it still having right turn lane paved with paving stones? Or is it now completely asphalt surface?
kapazao (2022-06-10 19:00:07+00:00): Hola, por favor vamos a editar con algo de precisión los aparcamientos.
No entiendo por qué lo has pegado a la carretera. Simplemente cubre su área y añade la vía de servicio.
Ya lo he corregido, un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122193473
user_5359 (2022-06-12 16:47:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
parukhin (2022-06-25 23:11:43+00:00): Коллега, здравствуйте. 
Не стоит писать всё в name.
"Бронзовая скульптура писателя С.Писахова"  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1585562791
Для "бронзовая" у нас есть тег material=bronze, для "скульптура"memorial=sculpture, но более точно всё же  memorial=statue
про "писателя" можете упомянуть сославшись через subject:wikipedia=
Вы же не говорите в жизни: Пойдёмте, покажу вам памятник "Бронзовая скульптура писателя С.Писахова"?
Если очень хочется добавить официальные названия - есть тег official_name. 
А памятникам верните, пожалуйста, нормальные названия.
LockOnGuy (2022-06-10 11:00:46+00:00): miroslavuzice87, Do not merge or delete roads without looking at road names or at least the sat images, you deleted the residential road 340-4 (way/4324083) and extended an unnamed road in its place,  please don't delete road numbers, in Iraq the address is kinda different from the rest of the world as we use numbers as the name of residential streets, some streets might have a number for a half and a different number for the other half, this is normal cause this street may be in 2 districts and each district give the street its unique number for the street name, etc.         
Also, why did you disconnect (Way: 768423530)? it's clearly showing a connected road in all aerial imagery available, please be careful next time.     
I reverted part of this changeset in changeset 122205164.       
Regards...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122193873
bxl-forever (2022-06-10 08:57:12+00:00): "Add Bicycle parking"… and bars, bakeries, waste baskets, shops, a tree, a fire hydrant… ;-)
mux4 (2022-06-10 09:02:50+00:00): Yes, I was puzzled too when I was looking for this commit to check for duplication (my map was not up to date this morning). Usually OSMAnd puts a full name, but there was a connection problem during the upload and he had to do it twice. Maybe that's where it came from.
uvi (2022-06-11 16:29:04+00:00): Bitte keine Löschungen weiter vornehmen und bitte hier weiter diskutieren https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=864808#p864808 !!!
uvi (2022-06-11 16:28:26+00:00): Bitte keine Löschungen weiter vornehmen und bitte hier weiter diskutieren https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=864808#p864808 !!!
streckenkundler_revert (2022-06-11 19:25:55+00:00): Revert mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122261335

Disskussion bitte nur unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75756
bxl-forever (2022-06-19 17:54:20+00:00): Hello,

I fixed the address.  Next time, please make sure to write the street name exactly as written on the way, i.e.
"Boulevard du Triomphe - Triomflaan"
and not just in one language.

Happy mapping.
uvi (2022-06-11 16:28:14+00:00): Bitte keine Löschungen weiter vornehmen und bitte hier weiter diskutieren https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=864808#p864808 !!!
dieterdreist (2022-06-11 19:20:13+00:00): Ob Details interessieren entscheidet der Mapper der sie einträgt, sie rauszulöschen obwohl sie zutreffen ist Vandalismus, bitte sofort damit aufhören.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-10 12:16:56+00:00): The imagery in this location is really new and shows houses where you have added this park.
Please do not add fictional features to OSM, they will be removed.
uvi (2022-06-11 16:27:56+00:00): Bitte keine Löschungen weiter vornehmen und bitte hier weiter diskutieren https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=864808#p864808 !!!
streckenkundler_revert (2022-06-11 19:20:40+00:00): Revert mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122261335

Disskussion bitte nur unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75756

streckenkundler
streckenkundler_revert (2022-06-11 19:22:36+00:00): Korrektur: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122261310
uvi (2022-06-11 16:27:10+00:00): Bitte keine Löschungen vornehmen und hier weiter diskutieren https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=864808#p864808 !!!
FraukeLeo (2022-06-11 17:54:24+00:00): SOFORT AUFHÖREN! Was im Himmel meinst du mit "meaningless addresses"? Inwiefern kann eine Adresse bedeutungslos sein? Sie sind einer der Hauptnutzen von OSM! Gerade neu gebaute Häuser oder Adressen in Hinterhäusern sind auf anderen Karten oftmals falsch.
FraukeLeo (2022-06-11 18:05:39+00:00): ... oder fehlen ganz.
streckenkundler (2022-06-11 19:15:47+00:00): Revert mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122261270

Disskussion bitte nur unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75756

streckenkundler
GinaroZ (2022-06-12 20:37:40+00:00): Please check the co-ordinates and the wikipedia page before adding, as it actually refers to a building on the coast here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=56.0315&mlon=-3.3492&zoom=15#map=18/56.03140/-3.34953