piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 107679175, 107679224, 107687282, 107692811, 107692923, 107692974, 107693024, 107693117, 107693200, 107804162, 107804268, 107804336, 107804413, 107804486, 107804523, 107804565, 107804667, 107804679, 107806202, 107806318, 107806638, 107807981, 107808105, 107808149, 107808223, 107829038, 107829635, 107830324, 107888815, 107888945, 107893449, 107910144, 107942650, 107942831, 107942909, 107942958, 107943011, 107943118, 107943596, 107964389, 107971329, 107971748, 107972056, 107972606, 107976965, 107977320, 107977385, 107977429, 107977749, 107977936, 107978023, 107978080, 108009219, 108012348, 108013333, 108013938, 108015329, 108016053, 108016131, 108016251, 108016382, 108023922, 108030966, 108031178, 108031255, 108031845, 108052208, 108052324, 108053647, 108053689, 108053846, 108053912, 108053973, 108089256, 108100780, 108110599, 108111553, 108218442, 108233544, 108233617, 108233889, 108233958, 108234199, 108285485.
Dimacn (2021-07-22 17:25:00+00:00): Пожалуйста придерживайтесь соглашения о названиях улиц - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог  Правильно так: улица Константина Паустовского
O Fim (2022-01-10 10:05:05+00:00): Ola amigo essa edição seria uma calçada? Você precisa fazer as ligações com a rua para existir roteamento
RiverBearings (2022-01-11 01:12:18+00:00): Olá, O Fim. Pueyrredon não está mais na equipe, mas posso tentar responder à sua pergunta. Parece que Pueyrredon reclassificou as calçadas para atender rodovias em um estacionamento que se conecta à calçada https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461276497. Concordo que as conexões entre a calçada e a rua são importantes para o roteamento, e aqui existe através de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965914984 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966375200. Farei conexões adicionais nas faixas de pedestres para melhorar o roteamento, pois o Mapillary está disponível nesses locais. Obrigado por trazer isso à minha atenção e tenha um ótimo dia.

Hello, O Fim. Pueyrredon is no longer on the team but I can try to answer your question. It looks like Pueyrredon reclassified footways to service highways in a parking lot which connects to the sidewalk https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/461276497. I agree that connections between the sidewalk and street are important for routing, and here it exists through https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965914984 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966375200. I’ll make additional connections at the crosswalks to improve routing since Mapillary is available at those locations. Thanks for bringing this to my attention and have a great day.
gscscnd (2021-07-23 07:19:56+00:00): 1. Zawsze dodawaj tag maxspeed:type lub source:maxspeed.
2. To jest dojazd do kilku domów w strefie zamieszkania — rozważ użycie highway=living_street.
3. Sąsiednia ulica ma nazwę „Walerego Wróblewskiego” — czy na tej nie brakuje imienia?
gscscnd (2021-07-23 07:21:17+00:00): Czy nie brakuje imienia w addr:street?
gscscnd (2021-07-23 07:17:06+00:00): Zawsze dodawaj tag maxspeed:type lub source:maxspeed.
gscscnd (2021-07-23 07:20:26+00:00): Czy nie brakuje imienia w nazwie ulicy?
eggie (2021-07-22 08:26:29+00:00): Hoi.. Je vraagt feedback..
De eindnodes van het wegdeel van de brug kun je verbinden met de omtrek van de man_made = bridge. 
Dat is zo'n beetje de regel.
Eigenlijk zou dat brugdeel (voetpad) dan layer=1 moeten zijn (geeft nog foutmelding) en dan de brug zelf layer=2

Groet
eggie
starsep (2021-07-22 13:42:13+00:00): Witam, została nadana nazwa części budynku o 7 piętrach. Czy w całej tej części jest siedziba firmy? 
Podejrzewam błąd, raczej lepiej zaznaczyć biuro jako punkt.
Proszę opisać lokalizację to postaram się pomóć :)
PT-53 (2021-07-23 18:46:57+00:00): Hallo  Hindsight007,
welche Verkehrszeichen stehen denn dort an diesem Weg genau?
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Ist dort landw.Verkehr verboten?

Fragende Grüße
Hindsight007 (2021-07-23 21:21:56+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
danke für den Hinweis und den Link. Es gibt ein Zusatzschild mit dem Wortlaut "Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr und Mofas frei". Die Eigenschaften hab ich entsprechend angepasst. 
Gruß
PT-53 (2021-07-24 05:22:52+00:00): Hallo Hindsight007, 
auf einem Path (nur für einspurige Fahrzeuge) können aber keine Traktoren etc. fahren. Dawar die vorherige Einstufung als Track doch korrekt, oder?

Und was ist mit diesen Wegabschnitten:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26709047/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26709048/history

Fragende Grüße
Hindsight007 (2021-07-24 12:59:51+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
ist korrigiert.
Grüße
PT-53 (2021-07-24 13:05:52+00:00): Danke
Futur3r (2021-07-22 11:58:55+00:00): Salut,

une partie du chemin à l'air d'être piétonne mais l'autre non. C'est difficile de savoir sans imagerie au sol.

En zone urbanisé, c'est plutôt highway=footway qu'un simple chemin généraliste.

Merci pour ta contribution, n'hésite pas à te documenter sur le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108408830
PT-53 (2022-04-03 09:15:24+00:00): Hallo Hindsight007,
Du hast diesen Weg
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966386506/history
von track auf path abgeändert.
Gilt das für den gesamten Weg oder nur für einen Abschnitt davon?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-04-17 06:29:40+00:00): Hallo Hindsight007, 
ich würde mich über eine Antwort freuen.
Danke und Grüße
user_2066394 (2021-07-22 11:32:27+00:00): Exitsiert das doch wieder?
MauswurfsFreunde (2021-07-22 11:44:05+00:00): ... hoffe ich doch - wir haben schließlich für August gebucht; lt. Website gab es wohl einen Betreiberwechsel.
user_2066394 (2021-07-22 11:53:16+00:00): Vor einem Monat hattest du es gelöscht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106116691

Ich würde es dann wieder komplett eintragen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dhotel
MauswurfsFreunde (2021-07-22 12:11:44+00:00): Oh, wenn ja, dann aus Versehen. Ich glaube aber, ich hatte nur den Punkt gelöscht, und wollte dem Gebäude die Eigenschaften von dem Punkt übertragen (die waren heute vor meinem Edit noch drin). Ich hoffe, nun stimmt alles wieder.
user_2066394 (2021-07-22 13:51:19+00:00): Einwandfrei
abakus_uploader (2021-07-22 22:30:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Diseret (2021-07-22 20:49:54+00:00): When an area has a 'hole' in it you create a multipolygon so that there is no overlap.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Draw the outer shape then select relation > new relation > multipolygon > the tags you want, then add outer as the role. Then when you draw the holes select relation > the relation you just created, and add role inner.
Emile Le Flécher (2021-07-23 09:16:23+00:00): Thanks Diseret for this explanation.
I understand better now how it is working. Thank you for the modifications also, looks amazing.
mueschel (2021-07-27 16:37:40+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please explain the meaning of "mintrans:garavto:hgv", this tag is not used in any other place.
Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 11:00:01+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=ramen;q
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637107192/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=ramen
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
emvee (2021-09-14 13:12:18+00:00): Hoi QuercE,

In deze changeset heb je aardig wat highway=giveway nodes toegevoegd, wat mij betreft prima!

Zou je volgende keer ook traffic_sign:direction=forward/backward ook kunnen toevoegen?

Ik heb dat zonet voor Zeeland gedaan: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111196160

Groeten,

Martin.
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
mavl (2021-07-23 16:01:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет правильные адресные данные с границы населённого пункта.  

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2868778/history  
  
Этот пакет правок частично отменён.
stefanct (2021-07-28 13:38:12+00:00): Hi,
amenity=school ist für Schulen bis zur Matura gedacht. In diesem Fall passt amenity=college besser - das ist für weiterführende Bildungsstätten (außer Unis/FHs) gedacht, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcollege
LG
mappinglander (2021-07-22 10:00:43+00:00): Hello, could you please explain that why did you changed a vacuum cleaner shop in Belgium and a hospital in India to a internet cafe, while connecting the node at India to a way and a residential area via relation?
mappinglander (2021-07-22 10:01:45+00:00): Also, for the next time, please split your changesets; and if you have any questions, please look to https://www.openstreetmap.org/help
dzamper (2025-08-30 08:28:35+00:00): way 131759233 w Ścinawie dostał przypadkiem 140 km/h
Marek_P (2025-08-30 08:51:45+00:00): Faktycznie, powinno być 50. Poprawiłem, dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi.
maraf24 (2021-08-17 22:10:17+00:00): Wycofane.
pio2_122 (2021-07-22 11:41:13+00:00): But to the point: I did a thorough research before editing each object.

In this case, there was a runway and an aeroway=aerodrome marker applied at this location before the change.
The website https://lotniska.dlapilota.pl/jaworze has this note: "Disused former military airfield: unmowed, high grass - you may be tempted to land on the rutted paths. Only in case of emergency.". I confirmed this information by searching for this airport on MIL AIP Poland - it is not listed. I also confirmed the unfavourable terrain conditions by verifying against the latest orthophotomap from the Central Office of Geodesy and Cartography. Deep car tracks can be seen there, confirming that there is high grass and/or sodden ground. Of course, no airport infrastructure or traces of aircraft landings (apart from the new helicopter landing pads) can be seen. You, on the other hand, claim that it "remains clearly visible" - based on what sources? If you meant only those helipads, then you should use the tag aeroway=heliport, instead of aeroway=aerodrome. This is clearly mentioned on OSM-wiki and avoids confusion. Also, it seems to me that this heliport currently has no name, so the name referring to the former airfield should at least be moved to the old_name tag, if not completely removed.
pio2_122 (2021-07-22 11:43:54+00:00): (Above is part two, this is part one) You restore the object, ask a question in the changeset description (you also put it in the note tag), and mention vandalism in the next sentence. However, that didn't prompt you to clarify the issue with the author by commenting on his changeset. Sorry, but this is a bit unprofessional.
iWowik (2021-10-26 13:32:09+00:00): День добрый!
Микрорайон не улица, для него не место в addr:street
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169256846/history
literan (2021-07-22 19:23:45+00:00): пробелы забыли в номерах домов. Исправлю
Lord_VM (2021-08-04 11:46:46+00:00): Спасибо
4b696d (2021-08-09 18:53:08+00:00): Moin Jansefred,

wieso zerlegst du den Ortsverband Marburg immer wieder in seine Einzelteile und fügst Duplikate hinzu?
Jensefred (2021-08-10 09:02:03+00:00): Moinsen, 
der Plan war das ganze Gelände als OV zu kennzeichnen und nicht jedes einzelne Gebäude. Das gsnze sollte eigentlich, konform, über die Tags emergency_service:technical (lt. Dokumentation für THW) und name:... laufen, das hat offensichtlich nicht funktioniert oder wurde nicht richtig gerendert... 
Für Tips bin ich jederzeit offen.
Gruß
4b696d (2021-08-11 19:27:54+00:00): Ich persönlich mag es lieber, wenn das Hauptgebäude getagt ist, an Stelle des Geländes. Wenn aber nun das Gelände getagt wird, dann sollten auch alle Tags auf das Gelände übertragen und auch die Relation angepasst werden. Was du hier nun aber gemacht hast, ist ein einziges Durcheinander. Du hast beim Gebäude zwei Tags entfernt, das Gelände doppelt aber mit unterschiedlichen Tags eingezeichnet und noch einen Node in die Mitte gesetzt. 
Für mich wäre es jetzt am einfachsten das einfach umzukehren. Aktuell sind auch sowieso die meisten Ortsverbände als Gebäude eingezeichnet.
Dimacn (2021-07-22 17:34:56+00:00): У вас опечатка в названии улицы: Чнтарный переулок
fabiotofy (2021-07-23 10:15:35+00:00): il civico 21a di Aurisina santa croce così però diventa doppio. O teniamo quello sull'edificio o quello sul cancello. Da fare una scelta. Io sono per la prima (ON BUILDING)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108420501
fabiotofy (2021-07-23 10:15:57+00:00): lo stesso per il 21c (teniamo solo uno dei due)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108420501
damjang (2021-07-23 11:42:19+00:00): Si, lo so che sono doppi, ma questo è il male minore, almeno per me. La regola è mettere il punto del civico dove fisicamente sta la tabella con il numero stampato. In questi casi però dove il portone è lontano dal building si perde il dato del civico sul building. Come già detto più volte bisognerebbe definire un tipo di tagging dove si riesce a mettere assieme le due cose (civico del building e posizione dell'entrata del civico). Fino ad allora e solo per alcuni casi mi sembra meglio duplicare il civico.
Langlaeufer (2022-10-17 12:53:55+00:00): Existiert dieser Weg überhaupt?
maraf24 (2021-07-24 17:06:23+00:00): Skąd to wiesz?
eggie (2021-07-22 11:17:48+00:00): Top!
Op de kaart rendert loc_name niet, maar het staat dan toch in de data van OSM
Gr eggie
A67-A67 (2021-07-22 11:36:01+00:00): This is incorrect. The Caribean parts of the Kingdom of the Netherlands are not in timezone Europe/Amsterdam.
trigpoint (2021-07-22 11:40:52+00:00): Hi, I am not sure that this edit makes much sense.
Whilst it is true that the European part of The Netherlands is within the timezone you have added, it is pretty unlikely that the parts of the relation that are in the Caribbean are on CET.

Cheers Phil
Lee Carré (2021-07-22 18:43:48+00:00): Previous commenters have a good point (and thanks for the hint about timezone=*). However, I'm here to plead for smaller changeset areas.
limes11 (2021-07-24 07:11:55+00:00): @Lee Carré: Not all large changeset areas are bad. It's unavoidable if relations such as the Netherlands are touched. In this case, the update is wrong, though.
Jose Luis Infante (2021-07-22 14:48:46+00:00): Hola,
no cal que facis una relació de restricció de gir de tipus no_u_turn per cada intersecció d'una via ja que no té sentit fer-ho per totes les interseccions de totes les vies.
Salutacions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108424257
EinKonstanzer2 (2021-07-29 14:11:45+00:00): landuse=military steht für ein aktives Militärgelände - also Sperrgebiet. OSM bildet den aktuellen Stand der Dinge ab, nicht jedoch historisches. Die Regel lautet "on-the-ground". Also nur das was man aktuell dort sehen kann.
Was sieht man denn noch von dem alten Gelände/was ist noch übrig???
wkdgs (2021-08-04 14:14:19+00:00): Wenn hier keine Antwort kommt, würde ich das Gelände wieder löschen. Wie du gesagt hast, passt  hier weder landuse=military noch der name-Tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108425524
wkdgs (2021-09-02 09:39:54+00:00): Habe das Gelände entfernt und den Benutzer gemeldet.
MxxCon (2021-07-23 02:52:51+00:00): spam is not welcome here!
daniel_solow (2021-08-18 12:40:37+00:00): yeah plus what you, Online Class Hero, are doing is not helping to prepare youth for college or trade they may want to do outside of school.
joost schouppe (2022-03-16 13:40:32+00:00): Is deze weg volledig weggehaald? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350043316/history
Op de luchtfoto's is dit nog gewoon zichtbaar. Het is dan sowieso wel handig als je er bijvoorbeeld highway=construction van maakt (als het heraangelegd wordt) of voorlopig razed:highway=construction (om te voorkomen dat het teruggedraaid wordt door iemand die de situatie minder goed kent)
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-29 17:37:33+00:00): What kind of trace of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966446261/history are remaining on the ground? Can you mention them in the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/966446261/history object?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-29 17:37:55+00:00): Also, what is the source of this edit? Aerial imagery? Old maps? Survey on the ground?
Eifelkobold! (2021-07-22 19:17:49+00:00): Guten Abend wermak,

du hast mit diesem Changeset am Knoten 4121604344 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4121604344), die erst vorgestern (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108313868) von mir gesetzte Kennzeichnung als Furt (ford=yes) wieder entfernt. Was ist der Grund dafür?

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
wermak (2021-07-22 21:46:39+00:00): Da ist der Tunnel des Siefenbach unter der Bahnstrecke etwas zu lang geraten. Ist jetzt wieder korrigiert.

Schöne Grüße
Eifelkobold! (2021-07-22 22:06:31+00:00): Alles klar, vielen Dank!

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
Layft Greater (2021-09-05 21:15:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471488134
Nearby0051 (2021-07-30 00:25:37+00:00): One step at a time :p
eggie (2021-07-22 13:07:56+00:00): Beste Henk,

Wat is je bedoeling. Je hebt de naam van de bushalte verwijderd, maar de bushalte gewoon laten staan. Is hier dan geen bushalte meer?
De busroutes bus 293 en de buurtbus staan nog steeds op de kaart.
Vraag anders even hulp op het forum van OSM.. Busroutes bewerken is een aparte tah van sport.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-22 13:08:55+00:00): M.a.w.  hoe lopen de busroutes hier dan wel?
eggie (2021-07-22 14:12:40+00:00): Henk  Ik draai je laatste changesets wel terug voorzover een andere mapper dat nog niet heeft gedaan.

MVG
eggie
Leo Slager (2021-07-22 14:12:49+00:00): Volgens het NDOV-haltebestand is er inderdaad maar 1 bushalte. Voor de tegenrichting ontbreekt de haltepaal.
Mogelijk rijdt 293 een rondje om weer naar de halte Sniederslaan te gaan.
De bushalte heb ik verwijderd.
eggie (2021-07-22 14:14:11+00:00): Er wordt al aan gesleuteld door een OV mapper. Zal je PB doorsturen. 
gr eggie
Rasto_t (2021-07-23 05:20:48+00:00): Ahoj, nie je to dalsia cesta? lebo ten povodny priebeh sedi aj s mojimi gps zaznamami napr. https://www.freemap.sk/?map=15/48.323729/17.257848&layers=X&tool=track-viewer&track-uid=3654mOjXmhZiN0P7o76KYG
vlado_h (2021-07-23 07:54:51+00:00): asi ano, dal som to naspat, je to aj na lidare
luiswoo (2021-07-22 14:14:57+00:00): Это не искусственный канал.
luiswoo (2021-07-22 14:35:26+00:00): Просто для дебилов — Пётр I попадал в Дон через Темерник, когда последний был судоходным.
luiswoo (2021-07-22 15:17:46+00:00): Признаю свою не правоту — сам дурак. Исток темерника в райное большых салов, а не ростовского моря.
eggie (2021-07-22 13:22:01+00:00): Beste Firestarter.. 
Je bedoeling is uiteraard goed, maar je kunt fietsroutes en busroutes beter niet bewerken met editor iD.

De route gaat dan stuk. Hier dus ook. Het kan wel met editor JOSM.
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 Ik kijk even of het simpel te herstellen is.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-22 15:22:57+00:00): De Fietsroute is inmiddels hersteld door onze fietsroute expert dvdhoven

MVG
eggie
grelus (2022-01-18 14:05:06+00:00): wycofanie zestawu spowodowało usunięcie sporego fragmentu rzeki Głomii od miejscowości Skórka do ujścia do Gwdy. Proszę o korektę i uważne rewertowanie zmian.
VA00 (2022-01-18 20:10:44+00:00): Co znaczy ,,brak weryfikacji'' ?
maraf24 (2022-01-18 20:14:41+00:00): Rzeczywiście zniknęła rzeka. Nie wiem jak do tego mogło dojść - powtórzenie operacji odtwarza rzekę w oryginalnej długości.
Poprawiłem błąd i w ramach zadośćuczynienia poprawiłem geometrię na całym usuniętym odcinku.
"Brak weryfikacji" odnosi się do zrobienia importu bez dokonania weryfikacji jego danych.
rthik007 (2021-07-23 05:10:37+00:00): Hi as16784,
overlapping way has been resolved by another user (Takadanobaba).
Kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108430476
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108429595
CloCkWeRX (2021-07-22 14:23:58+00:00): Oh, nice work :)

If your focus is on buildings, you might be interested in mapwith.ai; where it will give you some suggested building outlines based on Bing imagery. Still have to check things carefully; and compare to other imagery just incase something has been knocked down since; but it can be a timesaver :)
sdsg (2021-07-23 03:23:57+00:00): Thanks for the tip - plan on doing plenty of fieldwork for paths, features, addresses etc post-lockdown.
Lee Carré (2021-07-22 14:24:51+00:00): Holy smokes, Casper; smaller changeset areas, please. Otherwise you're liable to scare the fleshies.
MoiraPrime (2021-07-22 15:50:26+00:00): This changeset area is 2 big. I'm scared. 😱
Lee Carré (2021-07-22 18:39:03+00:00): See, what did I tell you, Cas?(!) 😄
Lee Carré (2021-07-22 18:48:28+00:00): PM'd Friendly_Ghost with a pointer to here, since he's busy editing and likely hasn't seen this discussion, yet.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-07-22 21:55:47+00:00): I only just noticed, lol. These bboxes need to be big so I can save myself some time.
tekim (2021-07-23 00:05:37+00:00): Please!, find a way to group these changes by geographic area, and keep the bboxes a reasonable size.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108430155
Friendly_Ghost (2021-07-23 06:53:44+00:00): That would take me 4 to 6 times as much time with no real benefit. I would understand this request for smaller changesets, but the ones I made yesterday were just too big for that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108430155
Lee Carré (2021-07-24 19:21:27+00:00): ‘What's best for me’ doesn't seem overly compatible with a collaborative community project.

The obvious counter-argument is that while your time might be saved, this is at the cost of other contributors (many who didn't comment still had to mentally filter-out this changeset).

Quality takes care.

Find a way to automate your desired goal; have the machines do the sub-division work for you. Best of both worlds, then.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-07-24 22:18:11+00:00): I can't code, so automating this process is out of the question for me, but I have figured out a workflow with taginfo, overpass turbo and JOSM to update deprecated tags reliably on a large scale. 

If you have the skills to automate this process with smaller bboxes, I invite you to create a bot like that, so we can feed it deprecated tags to update.
tekim (2021-07-25 01:05:27+00:00): Can you share your workflow with us?
Friendly_Ghost (2021-07-25 08:39:29+00:00): Hi Tekim, yes I can. I will do that when I'm at my desk.