piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skyper (2022-12-14 23:04:34+00:00): Salli TheCCraft,
herzlich willkommen bei OSM.
Bitte sei vorsichtig, was das Löschen von Objekten angeht. Meist sind Lebenszykluspräfixe die bessere Alternative, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix.
Insbesondere bei Gebäuden ist es sinnvoll diese als abgerissen (`razed:building=*`) zu erhalten, damit sie nicht versehentlich erneut eingetragen werden, denn auf den Hintergründen sind sie ja noch vorhanden. Habe es in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130092021 verbessert und auch die Baustellenfläche erweitert.

Als Tipp noch: In BW haben wir Maps4BW als zusätzlichen Hintergrund, welcher sehr Lage genau und für Gebäude die bevorzugte Quelle ist.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen,
Grüße skyper
TheCCraft (2022-12-15 10:10:08+00:00): Danke
Changju Ahn (2022-09-30 20:48:14+00:00): 이거 왜 추가안되냐
Mashin (2022-10-01 22:21:46+00:00): Hi and thanks for contributing to OSM!
I checked and the building still appears on all recent aerial imagery. I guess what makes it confusing is that it is split into several building parts with different heights.
I think the easiest way for you to add a new business would be to create a new point and mark it as a new restaurant.. etc. That way you don't need to deal with complicated buildings or drawing new building outlines.
Cheers
Mashin
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-01 12:48:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141956457 tava mais correto antes.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-01 09:23:05+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126852705

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
4b696d (2022-10-01 09:25:30+00:00): Moin, ich haben die Änderungen rückgängig gemacht, weil sie falsch waren und Informationen doppelt hinzugefügt wurden. Im Wiki ist genau beschrieben, wie z. B. Telefonnummern formatiert sein sollten und wie Ortsverbände vom THW getaggt werden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:contact:*

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency_service%3Dtechnical
MaciekMma (2022-10-06 14:17:21+00:00): Czemu usunales? Budowa juz oficjalnie ruszyla, w trenie dziala ciezki sprzet na kilku frontach. Tutaj zdjecia sprzed paru dni:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v8UOU6aXM0U
maraf24 (2022-10-06 16:44:18+00:00): Jak napisałem, ZRID to nie jest powód do dawania construction. A A innego źródła nie podano.
Dodatkowo budowa powinna być tam, gdzie jest budowa, a nie na całej długości.
MaciekMma (2022-10-06 17:17:36+00:00): Czy źródło, które podałem jest wystarczająće? Ja sie upierac nie bede, ale ta budowa jest już rozciągnięta na odcinku około 12km i jest dobrym punktem orientacyjnym w terenie, ludzie widzą co siędzieje a sama budowa jużma wpływ na lokalnąspołeczność. Dzisiaj robiłem "inspekcję" na odcinku Swory-Sitnik-BiałaPodlaska i na całej długości zerwany jest humus, wycięte wszystkie drzewa, wytyczone drogi serwisowe, część z nich już wstępnie utwardzona, położonych kilka przepustów, setki jednostek ciężkiego sprzętu jeżdzą w te i we wte.
WSHerx (2022-10-03 02:59:44+00:00): Hallo Radbubi, zur lokalen Situation folgende Informationen: Die "Kunstschule Villa Wieser Herxheim" ist eine kommunlae Institution, die trotz ihres Namens nicht in der Villa Wieser , sondern im Gerhard-Weber-Haus untergebracht ist. Das Gerhard-Weber-Haus wurde für die Kunstschule im Park der Villa Wieser errichtet. Für manche Aufgaben werden auch andere Gebäude mit benutzt, nämlich das Rathaus, das Alte Rathaus und die Villa Wieser [https://www.kunstschule-villa-wieser.de/kunstmachtschule/?page_id=47]. Die Villa Wieser ist ein bedeutsames historisches Gebäude, das von der Gemeinde multifunktional für Konzerte, Trauungen und Ausstellungen der Kunstschule Villa Wieser genutzt wird. Die Villa Wieser als "Kunstschule Villa Wieser" zu benennen ist nicht korrekt. Gruß WSHerx
Radbubi (2022-10-03 12:06:47+00:00): Hallo WSHerx,
die Namen habe ich nicht vergeben, sondern nur die Umrisse korrigiert. Siehe auch Changelog des Gebäudes. Demnach wurden die Namen bereits 2012 bzw. 2015 vergeben. Ich habe daran nichts geändert.
Ich bedanke mich dennoch für deine Korrektur.
Gruß
Radbubi
WSHerx (2022-10-03 13:42:43+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
Kann ich nachvollziehen.
Gruß 
WSHerx
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-01 09:20:38+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
michalsochacki (2022-10-04 12:42:21+00:00): Tak, ale obszar już usunąłem. Dodałem go aby sprawdzić czy wtedy pojawią się schody.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-04 12:48:18+00:00): OK. Czy serwer deweloperski może być używany do takich testów w przyszłości? Dziękuję.

http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/
AnnaCatarina (2024-11-03 09:59:39+00:00): Hello,
I wonder about tagging S-tog as light rail, because the technical parameters like train length and capacity, vmax and gradients are like a heavy rail. And therefore like RER or S-Bahn, I think it should be tagged as heavy rail as opposed to light rail systems with train lengths far less than 100 m, vmax less than 100 kmph, smaller curves and steeper ramps.
Regards.
mikkolukas (2024-12-09 03:12:57+00:00): Just for future readers, we had a conversation over messages, where I expressed why I disagree. In summary, I believe tagging S-tog as railway=light_rail aligns with the criteria outlined on the OpenStreetMap wiki. Characteristics like train length, vmax, and gradients are not definitive for tagging decisions, and globally, light rail systems exhibit a wide range of these parameters. S-tog’s infrastructure and operational features fit better with light rail than heavy rail, in contrast to systems like the RER.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-10-06 16:44:56+00:00): Vejen Atletik Stadion is not a secondary highway
rowcherryrow (2022-10-07 20:51:34+00:00): You are correct, I will remove it from the stadium boundary. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
Frans S (2022-10-02 09:56:51+00:00): Hello,
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.

Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/

Tips 
Connect nodes of highways to each other to achieve a road network which can be used by satellite navigation systems. (these cannot deal with a gap between 2 pieces of roads)

Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126841943
eggie (2022-10-01 05:24:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-01 05:27:29+00:00): Dag O_Q  Wanneer er een fietsje staat getekend op het wegdek .. dan cycleway=lane  .. Geen fietsje.. dan cycleway=shered_lane..
Kijk je nog even naar je edits?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-01 05:34:25+00:00): Het werkt nu.. Ook in de OFM
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=51.91724%2C6.08032%3B51.91706%2C6.08242#map=19/51.91713/6.08137
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-10-01 06:22:44+00:00): Verkeerde commentaar op verkeerde changeset.. excuses..
eggie (2022-10-01 06:24:32+00:00): reverted by changeset #126848029

Het is een fietssuggestiestrook.
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-12-04 03:30:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4526320 - pamiętasz może to miejsce?
syntex (2024-12-06 21:57:51+00:00): Przekopiowałem znaczniki z punktu na obszar
Glassman (2022-10-01 23:56:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126842453
Glassman (2022-10-01 23:56:22+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126842541
Glassman (2022-10-01 23:57:11+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126842541
Glassman (2022-10-01 23:57:28+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126842782
Frans S (2022-10-03 12:06:56+00:00): Hello again.
In addition to my comments on your mappings, please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126842870
letihu (2022-10-09 19:19:20+00:00): So ein großer Container mitten auf der Straße?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099456304/history
Ökkel (2022-10-09 21:28:59+00:00): Ja, bzw. ein Komplex aus vielen Containern. Das Gymnasium wird aktuell komplett erneuert:
https://www.nw.de/lokal/kreis_herford/herford/22923364_Das-Ravensberger-Gymnasium-zieht-in-Schulcontainer.html
mikkolukas (2022-09-30 22:55:11+00:00): Tak @osmviborg for heads up! :)
englu (2022-10-03 16:17:10+00:00): Czy celowo ścieżki 1099456869 i 995546640 przestały się ze sobą łączyć? Nie ma tam już przejścia?
magik1969 (2022-10-03 21:02:26+00:00): Ścieżka 995546640 kończy się w polu kukurydzy. Nawet wcześniej jej istnienie w końcowym biegu jest dyskusyjne. Rozglądałem się uważnie, ale nie znalazłem jej dalszych, nawet minimalnych, śladów.
Ścieżką 1099456869 nie jechałem, więc nie wiem gdzie dokładnie się kończy.
Frans S (2022-10-03 12:23:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.s


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843286
Frans S (2022-10-03 12:26:37+00:00): Hello again. 
Another issue.  Do not include the yard in a mapping. In 1 occasion you just mapped the yard instead of the building
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843286
John Kastner (2022-10-03 22:34:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your edits.

I noticed a few mistakes in this changeset. You've accidentally set `landuse="path=highway"` here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099458638 and `addr:street ="junction=circular"` here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099458639 .

In both cases you also added a `name` to the feature. The `name` tag in OpenStreetMap should typically not be descriptive. That the path is a path is already encoded by `highway=path`, so adding `name=path` is not needed. See this wiki page for more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Frans S (2022-10-03 12:15:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
A remark. There is no need to map/tag traces on bare ground, what seems to become a construction site.


Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843368
sbelemey (2022-10-07 07:52:53+00:00): Hello, Baloo Uriza!
 I noticed that you have added many roads primary and trunks which intersect actual roads and causing issues in OSM roads connectivity, as I can see the edit were done by JOSM, did you plan to do such edits? And what is the ground truth for them?

best regards,
sbelemey
Baloo Uriza (2022-10-07 11:49:14+00:00): US 81 is mostly what I was working on in this changeset, this particular one getting details around Enid (lanes in particular) updated.

Might I ask why this is drawing hostility now after I've been working on lanes for basically a decade at this point?
sbelemey (2022-10-10 10:57:11+00:00): Hello!
Thanks for your answer. I’m sorry if it looks like hostility, but I just really don’t found any source for this road, and it also does not connect to other roads, that’s why I just were worried that maybe it wasn’t planned mapping. 

best regards,
sbelemey
boopington (2022-10-25 23:13:44+00:00): is this supposed to be some testing?
MikeN (2022-10-26 00:17:57+00:00): It looks like US 81 was duplicated, for example this stop sign is in the middle of Lake Ellsworth.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10065537792
boopington (2022-10-26 00:47:48+00:00): yea im starting to wonder if he hasn't noticed it.
Baloo Uriza (2022-10-26 01:28:05+00:00): You're right, I didn't see it until you pointed out the Lake Ellsworth giveaway.  I'm fairly certain this goof was limited to just the pasted version, but I'm doublechecking.
Baloo Uriza (2022-10-26 01:39:08+00:00): OK, looks like it was a clean copy and transform missing the relation, so this *should* be fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128060909

My confusion was definitely the buried lede, copying US 81 to the southwest was definitely not my intention.
Baloo Uriza (2022-10-26 01:45:14+00:00): Anyrate, sorry for the goof, thanks for the catch.
Frans S (2022-10-03 12:20:03+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843443
conradoos (2023-01-21 22:46:14+00:00): Tego odcinka nie ma na ortofotomapie. I w którym miejscu ten odcinek łączy się z innymi drogami? Bo obecnie jest niepołączony.
jmap828 (2023-01-22 17:47:57+00:00): Witam,
Włącz na geoportalu funkcję adresy i ulice. Tam jest zaznaczona ta ulica, a także ujęta w wykazie ulic starachowickich pod adresem
https://wykaz.rky.pl/m0947930.html
A, że nie jest obecnie połączona w terenie drogą z sąsiednimi ulicami Kościelną i Grzybową, to już inna rzecz...
Istnieje natomiast połączenie ścieżkowe z drogą wewnętrzną (odnogą ulicy Kościelnej).
Pozdrawiam serdecznie
jmap828
conradoos (2023-01-22 18:12:39+00:00): OSM nie służy do kopiowania dokumentów urzędowych nie mających pokrycia w rzeczywistości. Jedna z zasad mapowania OSM, to "Mapuj, co jest na ziemi" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki). Więc jeżeli tego fragmentu ul. Starowiejskiej nie ma w terenie, to nie należy go dodawać na mapie.
Jako źródło zmiany podałeś ortofotomapę, a na ortofotomapie nie ma tej ulicy i dlatego się o nią pytam. Jeżeli tej ulicy nie ma w rzeczywistości, ale jest już planowana, to można ją oznaczyć jako "proposed" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:proposed). 
I już uwaga zupełnie na marginesie - nie ma sensu dodawanie dróg niepołączonych z innymi drogami, dlatego że żaden router jej nie wykorzysta.
Frans S (2022-10-03 11:57:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:


* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843605
Frans S (2022-10-03 11:56:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843652
Frans S (2022-10-03 10:58:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* The shadow of a building included in your mapping.
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843657
Frans S (2022-10-03 12:05:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. I reviewed several tasks you have mapped. They all show the same issues. 
Please pay attention to next points:
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and hardly squared despite the very clear imagery. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843657
Cristoffs (2022-10-06 11:28:44+00:00): Tutaj też drogę "wyprostowałeś", już poprawiłem
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843749
Frans S (2022-10-03 11:45:15+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843761
Hans Thompson (2022-10-15 19:59:34+00:00): Is this the name of a location or a point of interest?
aceman444 (2023-03-12 21:38:03+00:00): There were no duplicate areas. You decided to change the areas where the constructions happen, which is fine if the construction progresses. Just please do not lie in the descriptions.
Also it looks like your changes introduced even more problems and had to be fixed soon after you: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128941591
Frans S (2022-10-03 11:44:14+00:00): Hello,
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.

Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
Tagging of highways:
Other countries:
 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843857
Frans S (2022-10-03 11:42:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126843869
Frans S (2022-10-03 10:49:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
A remark.  There are quite a lot of high buildings. Map them over rooflines and move the whole mapping to the groundplan
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126844077
Unbeatable101 (2022-10-03 17:21:14+00:00): Hi soham2799, and welcome to OSM. I see that you have added a path to the map. In the future, you should connect paths such as that one you added to the roads, so they can be properly routed using other software (I have already done this one for you).
cnvery (2022-10-03 02:37:23+00:00): 明白，谢谢！
dygituljunky (2025-02-15 16:46:46+00:00): I know this changeset is over 2 years old. However, I'm wondering if relation 955212 should include Oxford College, too? Or should 955212 be "Emory University - Atlanta Campus" and we add another relation that includes Oxford and Atlanta campuses?