piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
letihu (2017-03-17 20:30:44+00:00): Stimmt, Du hast nur den Straßennamen gefixt. Schön ist das aber nicht, wenn Du nicht erkennst, das mitten auf der Straße sicher kein Sportcenter ist.
BCNorwich (2017-02-25 07:59:32+00:00): Hello, I noticed you changed the name of this bus stop. This POI is a bus stop not a telephone box.
If your intention is to map a defibrillator then you have not done so. The phone box is not mapped, please add it as a separate POI. If it is now defibrillator position please properly map it as such. At the moment a bus stop named Defibrillator  does not mean anything and does not show on the map as a defibrillator.

Please see here for an example phone box defibrillator :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2426500160
and here for general info :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator

Regards
SK53 (2018-08-03 13:42:26+00:00): Hi Kev, Can I ping you to check again on the status of what used to @d2? Just trawling through the history of edits to Nottingham pubs & this stands out as open, but without a name. Cheers, Jerry
kevjs1982 (2018-08-07 11:34:34+00:00): Checked just now, offices for RVS Group on the ground floor. Upper floors are "2 bedroom apartments" coming soon at "74 Lower Parliament Street". RVS showroom is next door still, looks like the apartments may also be above that
letihu (2017-03-09 14:34:00+00:00): Bist Du sicher, das dieser Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477013227/history
einfach so durch das Haus mit der Nr. 35 geht?
Die hört bestimmt schon früher auf und hat keine Verbindung zur Breite Straße.
fx157 (2017-03-09 15:52:33+00:00): Ja bin ich. Da ist ein Durchgang und dort ist auch der Eingang zu der Kneipe gewesen (ich weiß nicht ob die noch auf hat). Für Fußgänger war der Weg auf jeden Fall gedacht. Die Frau des Wirts hatte nach hinten auch noch ein Dessousgeschäft. 
Bei Nachfrage gerne noch mehr Details. Vielleicht schaffte ich es am WE dort mal vorbei zu schauen, dann man ich noch ein Foto. (ich hatte dort mal ne Freundin) 

Grüße
letihu (2017-03-09 16:57:23+00:00): Ok, super. Dann brauchen wir nur noch einen Gebäudedurchgang mappen. Wir brauchen aber noch die Position, wo der Durchgang ist. 35, 36 oder dazwischen.
fx157 (2017-03-13 07:23:37+00:00): https://goo.gl/photos/aiTP7yvzSz6peMo67

https://goo.gl/photos/qLJDY84rBdF33GBv5

Ich habe mal einen Tunnel angelegt. Habe aber gerade keine Zeit genauer nachzuschauen, ob das so korrekt ist.
Werde mich später nochmal darum kümmern.
fx157 (2017-03-15 05:59:42+00:00): So, nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen. Habe ich noch etwas vergessen? Oder ist Tunnel überhaupt die korrekte Linienart?
letihu (2017-03-15 16:31:17+00:00): Ja, das hast Du fast perfekt gemacht.
Hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4731709380/history
waren die Wege nicht/nicht mehr miteinander verbunden. Leider erkennt iD diesen Fehler nicht. Ich hab´ das mal nachgeholt.
Ich verstehe gar nicht, wie man mit dem fürchterlichen iD überhaupt arbeiten kann, wenn nicht mal des Verbinden einfach möglich ist. Ich finde ja nichteimal die Funktion dafür.
Stereo (2017-02-25 12:22:28+00:00): Hi! The version of JOSM you’re using, 6388, is from November 2013. There have been many improvements and fixes since. Is there a bug that’s stopping you from upgrading?

Happy mapping,

Guillaume
Prince Kassad (2017-02-25 17:33:35+00:00): Hi, the reason for this is actually that JOSM after 6388 forces you to enter a source and refuses upload if you don't enter one. But most of my changes are mere fixes to existing OSM data (like this one - "Wochenendhausgebiet" is not the name of a village, but a description of the residential area) - so what should I enter as the source if I only change existing data without adding new data? Entering nonsense like "asdfghjkl" as the source just to appease JOSM doesn't seem to be a solution. I've actually been meaning to manually change the source code to get rid of this for my private copy of JOSM at some point but never got around to doing it.
Stereo (2017-02-25 18:09:08+00:00): Oh, that's solvable: source=local knowledge, or common knowledge, or extrapolation are the ones I use. I think that recent versions actually let you leave that field blank - but other mappers appreciate good changeset data :)
PlaneMad (2017-03-27 06:46:17+00:00): Hi, why was the name:ru label removed from the town?
manings (2017-02-27 11:01:46+00:00): Hi relearth, The data you added seems to be company offices and not really artworks or community_centre.  Can you fix that? Thanks
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-23 07:05:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4704323277/history has amenity = water that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
amenity=water? What is this?

If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typically
used.

man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.

man_made=water_tap with drinking_water=no is typically used to indicate
tap without drinking water

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=water
gileri (2017-02-24 21:18:27+00:00): source=survey
L___I (2018-12-06 02:31:13+00:00): Hi,
die durch diesen CS geleerte Uni-Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2176008 habe ich durch diesen Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65221980 wieder aufgefüllt...
Gruss
dónal (2017-02-24 22:07:11+00:00): correction: added buildings.
woodpeck (2017-02-27 13:51:02+00:00): I'm afraid I will have to remove these imports because they haven't been discussed with the community (as mandated by the import policy), and (probably as a consequence of such lack of discussion) are faulty, using invalid tags and duplicating information that already is in OSM.
DaveF (2022-09-06 16:49:23+00:00): Hi
Could you clarify what the 'physical' key represents?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477042500/history
DUGA (2021-08-06 23:49:42+00:00): SR 3004 is never unpaved. The actual surface is very close to compact.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10688392/history#map=16/41.7059/-77.4126
manings (2017-02-27 10:32:07+00:00): This looks like a duplicate of a bigger hospital: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477045300
Te-Ika (2017-03-01 16:50:20+00:00): That it is I didn't notice that when I made that addition. Thank you for the review. I changed it to a Hospital Building instead of its own hospital.
calfarome (2017-02-28 20:46:27+00:00): Hi topolusitania . May I know the reason why did you delete a point of interest in this changeset?. 
See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46383633
topolusitania (2017-03-03 00:19:50+00:00): It does'nt exist
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-25 07:53:39+00:00): Hi daniellipuma. May I know the reason behind deleting many mapped highways in this changeset? If it's private, you can use e.g. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate

More information about this changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46383951
AgusQui (2017-03-02 04:22:02+00:00): Borraste un barrio entero! ¿Cuál sería el motivo?
daniellipuma (2017-03-02 11:05:48+00:00): Yo hice el trazado del barrio. Y vecinos del mismo me pidieron eliminarlo por problemas de seguridad. Así que he decidido no tener problemas y borrarlo.
Zalitoar (2017-03-02 16:38:03+00:00): No justifica eliminar los datos. Si tienen problemas de seguridad, no son originados porque haya un mapa de las calles además los datos del mapa no exponían datos personales o sensibles. Revierto la eliminación invitando a quien quiera a que se contacte con la comunidad que mantiene el mapa en cualquiera de los canales que tenemos: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina#Comunicaci.C3.B3n
AgusQui (2017-03-02 17:21:10+00:00): Daniellipuma si no lo mapeabas vos lo hacía alguien más, por más que borres los datos el barrio igualmente se ve en imágenes satelitales, y aunque tengan la posibilidad de pixelar las satelitales como hacen algunos paises grandes con sus bases militares, igualmente se pueden mapear (mira el área 51: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/37.2394/-115.8140). Por otro lado pensar que los chorros llegan porque los ven en un mapa... borremos toda la Argentina! (Avisenle a Bullrich acá está la solución jeje), y tienen que borrar el barrio de otros mapas como Waze...
oormilavinod (2017-03-24 09:41:18+00:00): Hey Jerryhappy, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maqu_County, wikipedia enlist this as a  county. it would be better if  the city tag is changed from a city to a county
user_1919824 (2017-06-03 08:30:58+00:00): I will fix it ;-)
dudka (2017-02-26 14:27:36+00:00): what is the source of german street names?
wanderer52 (2017-02-27 20:50:55+00:00): Я все написав по двом сучасним українським джерел
/ Я все написал по двум современным украинским источникам:
    -    http://www.lvivcenter.org/en/umd/mapdetails/plan-von-czernowitz-mit-der-neuen-strassenbenennung-etc-c1911/ ;
    -    http://www.lvivcenter.org/en/umd/map/?ci_mapid=221 .

Я различал / розрізнял:
    -    "old name" = де нинішню назву відрізняється від німецької назви
            (наприклад Чернівці:  "Ольги Кобилянської" вул. <--> "Herrengasse")   
    - "name translated" = де нинішню назву з тим же значенням що і німецькі назви
            (наприклад Львів:  "Вірменська" вул. = "Armeniergasse")
jleedev (2017-02-28 16:14:53+00:00): I'm tempted to delete this, since a large footway area does not adequately describe this feature, and the default tile layer does not seem to like it. However, a retail/commercial landuse doesn't seem right to me either. Thoughts?
Nakaner (2017-02-25 19:54:23+00:00): Hi mhenson,

when was this import discussed on the Imports mailing list as it is required by the Import Guidelines? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Btw, please stop uploading further changesets which belong to this import..

Best regards

Michael
mhenson (2017-02-25 23:00:44+00:00): This was discussed on the slack channel openstreetmap imports like the mailing list keeps saying to use.
mhenson (2017-02-25 23:42:36+00:00): I sent a message on the import mailing list looking for more discussion.
mhenson (2017-03-03 03:36:38+00:00): This has been discussed on the import mailing list. I am going to continue with the import.
Nakaner (2017-03-03 06:34:08+00:00): Please be patient and wait a few days more. You have already ignored the list because you imported it before discussing it. You should be happy that I did not revert it at whole due to a violation of the guideline.
mhenson (2017-03-03 15:20:18+00:00): i will wait.
mhenson (2017-03-20 01:03:44+00:00): 1) Thank you for keeping an eye on the integrity of people following the import guide lines. I get emailed if anyone make a change or leaves a note within 50 miles of Stillwater, OK so that I may check the integrity of the change set. 
2) I believe I have followed the import guide lines. Is their anything I missed? I hope to have some time this week to continue a some changes sets on this import.
pkoby (2017-02-25 06:08:23+00:00): Hey, I noticed that you changed a lot of crossing=* to crossing=zebra, but according to the wiki, this isn't a standard tagging scheme. It appears it's a commonly used tag, but while I think it might be fine changing =uncontrolled to it, I think changing =traffic_signals to =zebra removes important information. The wiki suggests using crossing_ref=zebra in these instances, while still using =uncontrolled or =traffic_signals or whatever. Would it be possible to revise these changes?
bhousel (2017-02-25 19:15:11+00:00): Hi pkoby, this is one of those situations where I think the wiki gives poor guidance.  The junction node between a crosswalk and the road exists so that vehicular traffic can know that there is a crossing there.  The stripes on the ground are a 'control device' so calling marked crosswalks "uncontrolled" is misleading.  And I think traffic signals is a feature of the intersection itself, or kerb points, not of the crosswalk itself (i.e. per "duck typing", you wouldn't say that it is a crosswalk of type "traffic signals").

However I do know that the way I am tagging things is different from the advice given on the osm wiki, so I'm willing to revert my changes to the crossing nodes if you feel strongly about it.  I don't think that the actual tag value set for `crossing=*` actually matters to any router.

Thanks for reaching out!
pkoby (2017-02-25 19:23:45+00:00): Your reasoning makes a lot of sense. In my way of thinking, zebra stripes are uncontrolled in the sense that they aren't unmarked and don't have signals. But taginfo shows crossing=zebra to be one of the most common, so I'm going to say it seems like a good strategy.

Yes, I suppose as long as the way is highway=footway, footway=crossing, and the node is highway=crossing, the crossing=* isn't important.
bhousel (2017-02-25 04:00:52+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Dangaaaa (2017-02-25 05:37:05+00:00): No problem, and thanks for the welcome!
DD1GJ (2017-02-25 10:45:44+00:00): Hallo, mit der App Maps.Me machst Du Eintragungen in einem weltweit sichtbaren Datenbestand. Mitten in einem Wohngebiet befindet sich wohl kaum eine bewirtschaftete alpine Schutzhütte. Wie OSM funktioniert, kannst Du hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
user_5359 (2017-02-25 15:16:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the footpath with the existing highways.
user_5359 (2017-02-25 15:08:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! This area isn’t a park, it is a residential area.
RSergei (2017-07-02 16:11:11+00:00): Доброго времени суток. Проставьте тег layer=*  на территории ГСК. Необходимо для правильной навигации в разных уровнях гаражей
Mloni (2017-02-26 12:47:31+00:00): Hallo Marsupium,
du hast in der Brienner Straße östlich des Königsplatzes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51787589/history) die Fahrspuranzahl wieder von 3 auf 4 erhöht. Das war richtig bevor dort letztes Jahr Radfahrstreifen abmarkiert wurden. Die lanes=3 war von mir eingetragen. Eigentlich sind es ja sogar nur noch 2,5 Spuren (1 Spur Richtung Osten und eine überbreite Spur nach Westen). Da es nur noch zwei abmarkierte Kfz-Spuren sind wäre allerdings wohl lanes=2 die korrekteste Darstellung.
Grüße
Mloni
manoharuss (2017-02-27 06:45:38+00:00): Hi Foothills,

I read the discussion on your first changeset. And as it seems you have imported similar incompatible road set again into OSM. 1. Before importing any data into OSM, read up on what is procedure regarding imports, what data is acceptable on OSM. Read: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines 2. None of these tags that the features have any tags associated with OSM. "highway=collector" is not a valid tag. Reading: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway 3. A import is best done by merging with existing data. For example if you have better geometry, you can replace geometry of the existing data and keep the feature tags but not introduce duplicates.

I am raising this issue with Data Working Group.

Until your edits are cleanedup or merged please do not continue importing.

Thanks.

Best,

Manohar
user_5359 (2017-02-25 08:29:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the single ways of buildung or pond to a closed area.
IbnTēšfīn (2017-03-05 13:46:37+00:00): As-Salamu Alaykum,
You removed from some places of worship the religion tag. I have previously seen you and other Iranian mappers doing so. Can you please explain me the reason for making such edits? Is it because these are not mosques but husayniyyat and imamzadehs ?
Thanks.
Shahinnia (2017-03-19 07:29:42+00:00): hi
have a nice day and happy to talk to you.
I edit tehran and as you said, i may deleted some points.
but let me explain. when I omit a point, change it into an area. so be relaxed and conformed that they aren't gone.
besides one of  my sources is tehran municipality
site: map.tehran.ir
you can be in contact with us(a 320 member group) in Telegram app. I can add you there.
+0989126587159
IbnTēšfīn (2017-03-19 14:35:13+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for answering my comment.
I think you did not understand me correctly.
This is what I am talking about  : 
https://osm.org/way/469025059 was created like this : 
  amenity = place_of_worship
  building = yes
  denomination = shia
  name = امامزادگان هفت دختران

I changed it to this : 
  amenity = place_of_worship
  building = shrine
  denomination = shia
  name = امامزادگان هفت دختران
  place_of_worship = shrine
  religion = muslim

Then you changed it to this : 
  amenity = place_of_worship
  building = shrine
  denomination = shia
  name = امامزادگان هفت دختران
  place_of_worship = shrine

Why did you remove religion=muslim ?
Have a nice day too.
Shahinnia (2017-03-19 17:17:16+00:00): I'm editing map with my mobile (Note4) while I'm free in my working place. we are not allowed to use our own laptop. so it's very hard for me to use all  suitable Tags. forgive me If I have done any thing wrong. I really didn't delet any information consciously.
Forgive my cellphone. ;-)
IbnTēšfīn (2017-03-19 18:36:03+00:00): OK no problem
eggie (2017-02-25 07:38:59+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden
Marych_ (2017-02-25 12:36:57+00:00): Если проезда нет, луше разделить дороги
или поставить barrier = block
Katayus' (2017-02-26 03:55:56+00:00): Я первый раз это делаю, еще толком не разобрался - что да как. Извиняюсь.
bxl-forever (2017-02-28 23:13:28+00:00): Hello,
Why did you remove the tag "tourism=artwork" to Bob et Bobette - Suske en Wiske (node #2506177880)?
Nakaner (2017-09-14 08:27:51+00:00): Hallo,

beim Anschauen der Änderungen eines WSW-Mappers ist mir dieser Änderungssatz aufgefallen. Ich denke, dass access=no + motor_vehicle=yes nicht das ist, was du hier taggen wolltest, oder? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56118559/history

Viele Grüße

Michael
Thoschi (2017-09-14 13:20:12+00:00): Schau ich mir an, wenn ich aus dem Urlaub zurück bin, danke schon mal für den Hinweis.
N
nammala (2017-02-27 05:52:44+00:00): Hi Waqar Aziz Raja,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. The edits you have made with office-government and the name tags seems suspicious with alpha-numeric names. Could you please confirm the edits you made. Please do add valuable data to the map.

Regards,
nammala
chillly (2017-02-27 19:36:40+00:00): Ye olde white hart was already in the map.
Mapmoo (2017-02-27 21:13:55+00:00): Hi chilly,yeah I saw it after I zoomed out,I was looking at the exact place the pub is it's on the left of the path as you face north
Commodoortje (2017-02-25 09:15:27+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Alex-98723 (2017-02-25 11:53:51+00:00): Thank you. 
How can I see my changes published?
Commodoortje (2017-02-25 13:00:26+00:00): De rendering duurt af en toe wat langer.
SHIFT+F5 doet wonderen
Alex-98723 (2017-02-25 15:22:53+00:00): Indeed. Updated. Not bad: For good old TeleAtlas it took up to 6 months in old times.
Thank you. It's fun!
alphensebezorger (2017-03-12 16:56:10+00:00): I think you made a typo in the name of the street. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477078297) There seems to be a l missing as the third letter.
And secondly: is this a two-way street? With just one lane one-way traffic seems probable.
Alex-98723 (2017-03-13 13:13:04+00:00): 1. Spelling corrected. Thank you!
2. This is a two-way street. Used mostly for parking, so not much traffic. Actually it is the lowest category.
MKnight (2017-03-05 21:38:00+00:00): Moin. "siehe webseite" etc. sind keine OSM-Tags/Werte. Lasse dies entweder weg, oder trage die korrekten Werte ein.
Danke.
Commodoortje (2017-02-26 19:27:33+00:00): Inderdaad mocht er begonnen worden met de bouw, kun je op onderstaand forumtopic een verzoek doen om de panden in te laten brengen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52973
Gebruik daar dan onderstaande link voor de positie:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.35840132489554/6.377633290228431
Warin61 (2022-09-27 01:11:07+00:00): Hi,

I have changed some boundaries of adjacent parks to what I think is more correct DCS Base Map boundaries.. approximately. 
Ones of concern are 
Way: Princes Park (203021850) and Way: Norford Park (186995446). See what you think ...
TZorn (2017-02-28 10:51:12+00:00): Hallo Terrysbestfriend. Willkommen bei OSM und Danke für die Mitarbeit.

Deine letzten Ergänzungen halten sich leider nicht immer an die gängigen Regeln und sind daher für die Kartenersteller und Navigationssoftware nicht richtig auswertbar. Wenn du es noch nicht getan hast, schau dir bitte noch mal kurz unseren Einsteigerleitfaden an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide

Ein paar konkrete Probleme: Du hast die Privatstraße richtigerweise mit einer Zugangsbeschränkung (access=private) für den öffentlichen Verkehr gesperrt. Leider überschreiben die weiteren tags (z. B. motor_vehicle=yes und foot=no) dies wieder. Siehe hierzu bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access.

Die Straße schneidet ein Gebäude. Wenn das Gebäude die Straße tatsächlich überspannt, sollte das in dem Abschnitt (Straße auftrennen!) mit tunnel=building_passage markiert werden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tunnel#Durchhaus

In das name-Tag gehört nur der tatsächliche Name (z. B. Robert-Blum-Straße). Wenn die Straße keinen Namen hat, bleibt das Tag leer. Bitte nicht generische Bezeichnungen wie Privatstraße eintragen.

Eine Zufahrt mit Tor sollte, wie du es schon angefangen hast, mit barrier=gate getaggt werden. Allerdings muss das Gate dazu auch mit der Straße verbunden sein, sie müssen also einen gemeinsamen Knoten besitzen. Ansonsten weiß eine Navisoftware nicht, dass das Gate diese eine Straße verschließt. Üblicherweise modelliert man das Tor auch nur als Punkt und nicht als Linie, wie du es gemacht hast (falsch ist es aber nicht). Siehe dazu bitte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:barrier.

Hauseingänge sind allerdings keine barrier=gate sondern entrance=yes, entrance=main oder ähnliches: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:entrance

Ich hoffe, diese Tipps reichen, damit du die Karte entspechen verbessern kannst. Ansonsten schau gerne im Forum vorbei: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
segi (2017-02-25 14:10:55+00:00): Ahoj,
čo si myslel pod týmto miestom s výhľadom?
Je to označenie určené prevážne na kopce a stráne odkiaľ je výhľad do okolitej krajiny.
Hjart (2017-02-25 11:19:39+00:00): Was this an error? (Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight#Common_mistakes)
Walter Schlögl (2017-02-25 21:50:42+00:00): Yes,
3,2 is wrong and 3.2 is correct.
Hjart (2017-02-25 21:53:11+00:00): Sorry, I initially only noticed the removal of the trailing "m". Otherwise you are correct.
GerdP (2017-09-06 14:24:17+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo oneway=roundabout on 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148810005
voschix (2017-09-06 16:48:52+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out. Corrected.
samely (2017-02-27 21:32:27+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM, however, I found many streets with bridge tag, I already fixed them.
tetsuo76 (2017-03-06 20:00:39+00:00): Hi,

I made a lot of modification in this area. Apparently all of those modification is deleted. Why? I drive a lot of time in this are