piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-10-28 11:02:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here. Please read the instructions. This is a building only project.
Just map buildings.
Whenever a road has to be mapped, use the correct tag
you mapped a small local road as a major highway (connecting towns !) end duplicated an existing road.
See this document as a guidance
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Best regards
Frans S (2020-10-29 14:17:38+00:00): Hello. 
Sorry. I did not realize highways are part of the project. My fault.
Best regards
Dimacn (2020-10-28 17:37:48+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы нарушаете правила оформления объектов в OSM. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Пожалуйста удалите текст из тега name
Ometepe (2020-10-30 15:08:39+00:00): Hi 弥太郎, thanks for contributing to OSM! I wanted to reach out about this changeset which caused the Kuril Islands archipelago to be submerged by water after you added the natural=water tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7273443. I removed this tag since it flooded the whole chain of islands, if you have any questions or need further guidance you can visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide. Happy mapping!

Japanese translation:
こんにちは弥太郎、OSMに貢献してくれてありがとう！ https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7273443にnatural = waterタグを追加した後、千島列島が水に沈む原因となったこのチェンジセットについて連絡したいと思いました。 このタグは島のチェーン全体に溢れているため削除しました。質問がある場合やさらにガイダンスが必要な場合は、https：//wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guideにアクセスしてください。 ハッピーマッピング！
user_5359 (2021-12-14 09:31:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864508634/history. You add a URL as value for admin_level. Did you mean the key website?
WoodWoseWulf (2020-10-28 05:31:19+00:00): Hi AwsCc10

Welcome to OSM.

The edits you are making don't appear to relate to anything, are you able to explain them?

Thanks!

-Wood
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Colin Smale (2020-10-28 07:54:45+00:00): Please revert this, it conflicts with tagging across the whole of the UK. The distinction you seek can be seen clearly in the tagging (admin=level, designation) so changing the name is unnecessary. Thanks!
user_5589 (2020-10-28 12:52:42+00:00): It has been reverted. However there is a fundamental problem with the situation as it is at the moment.

I have been trying to run Overpass Turbo queries to simply select Warwick as a town and always seem to run into only being able to select Warwick as a district. geocodeArea:Warwick, England}}->.searchArea; and variants always seem to bring up the district, whereas queries like geocodeArea:Whitnash, England}}->.searchArea; and variants will of course simply bring up the area of Whitnash itself etc.

Warwick does exist as a level 10 admin area multipolygon, the same as the other towns and villages in the region. However I simply cannot seem to get Overpass to select it or indeed get to the object if I run a search in Nominatim.

For some Overpass queries this doesn't matter, but for others querying the whole district produces a massive amount of data which slows things down considerably. So any insights you might have for solving this would very much be appreciated.
Colin Smale (2020-10-28 13:32:24+00:00): I believe Overpass relies on Nominatim for geocode queries like this. Nominatim is not well-suited to the UK situation where there the admin boundaries and addresses live in parallel universes. The admin_level=10 boundary is strictly the boundary of the town council, which may or not correspond to a particular view of "Warwick" as a settlement. Could you use a different form of filter in Overpass? like this:
area[name="Warwick"][admin_level=10][boundary=administrative]->.warwick;
rel(pivot.warwick);
out geom;
If you want to experiment with the workings of nominatim, you might like to take a look at this: https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=W&osmid=256062900&class=building - a reverse geocode of a building in the the centre of Warwick, so you can see what nominatim knows and what it uses.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-10-28 20:31:10+00:00): Hi Sourajit,
It seems like you accidentally placed this park in the middle of the ocean: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8057572861
clay_c (2020-11-07 00:47:31+00:00): Looks like you accidentally changed the relation for the BNSF Aurora Subdivision to route=train. This relation describes railway infrastructure, not a passenger train, so I reverted it to route=railway. Let me know if you have any questions.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-12 06:32:43+00:00): How this import handled existing landuse? Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685277039 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864514999
Jethron (2020-10-28 04:15:55+00:00): Looks good. Thanks for the edit and welcome to OSM!
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
chnav (2020-10-28 11:15:17+00:00): Здравствуйте, в этой правке вы удалили контур населённого пункта со всеми тегами и нарисовали новый, часть информации утеряна. Пожалуйста ничего не удаляйте без острой необходимости. Правка полностью откачена, контур НП восстановлен в прежнем виде и переделан из мультиполигона в обычный полигон.
chnav (2020-10-28 11:17:56+00:00): Кроме того старый контур был нарисован намного точнее, а ваш залез на водохранилище. Пожалуйста будьте аккуратнее.
woodpeck (2020-12-03 21:59:59+00:00): In this changeset you have changed one "Circle K" store to "disused" and you used the changeset comment "update brand" which doesn't capture the most important change. Also, there is a second "Circle K" just a few metres away. Did you not see that when you looked at the area you were editing?
IpswichMapper (2020-10-29 00:29:46+00:00): Hello,

This changeset seems to have broken the order of multiple relations, as can be seen on the OSM inspector:

http://i.imgur.com/i5c5miQ.png

I opened up bus route 15 in JOSM, and it seems like big segments of the relation of have been jumbled up.

Are you using the "public_transport" add-on to automatically do this? 

I just started using that add-on and trying to "sort" routes using that add-on just breaks their order. Also, the way that this changeset has fragmented the routes seems similar to how the "public_transport"  addon would do it.

If you are using that add-on, I would recommend against it, as it doesn't seem to work that well (as demonstated with OSM inspector) and it was written to work with the now abandoned "Oxomoa scheme".
MacLondon (2020-10-29 05:49:20+00:00): Hi. My changeset actually corrected the bus routes.

It was the most recent changeset for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145395450 that removed this (or possibly another nearby) way from all the bus routes that were affected. 

I merely fixed the gap after seeing the issue on OSM Inspector, but the PTv2 validator only refreshes once daily at around midnight-1am in UK. Tonight's results show these routes as valid; I have had a go at correcting the invalid London-Norwich trains which I expect will now be valid after tonight's update to the validator.

BTW I don't use any plug-in for reordering routes.
IpswichMapper (2020-10-29 09:40:53+00:00): Oh ok, it was an edit I made to Prince Street (which literally every bus uses) that broke that. Thanks for the input.

What confuses me is that I literally downloaded "Stoke Park Drive" into JOSM and looked at bus route 15, and there were gaps.  They are gone now even though no changes were made between yesterday night and today...

Also, as for OSM Inspector's timing, it displays data from 7pm of that day. I was checking OSM inspector long after 7pm, and it still hadn't updated. So it refreshes at 1am, but uses data from 7pm? Why?

The London to Norwich trains don't seem correted in OSM inspector, but OSM inspector hasn't updated yet, so that will happen soon (then we can see).

The wiki page on train routes if very unclear. It doesn't describe what roles should be used for stops. For bus routes, it says "public_tranport=platform" with role "platform".

But what role do you use for "public_tranport=station"? This is not explained in the wiki at all.
MacLondon (2020-10-29 15:16:36+00:00): It seems that OSM Inspector's various different tests are carried out at different times, e.g. PTv2 tests at about 11pm, Routing tests (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-0.66788&lat=51.94329&zoom=8&overlays=unconnected_open_ends_1) at about 6pm.

It seems to me that the various tests might get updated on the page at different times of the day too. Where OSM Inspector mentions the time of the update that is the time in Germany.

Until the past month the PTv2 results were updated at midnight almost on the dot, but have been anywhere between 12am-1am recently (including before the clocks changed.) The update for the Routing test seems to update at a later time during the night despite being tested hours earlier.

For stops, tag is "public_transport=stop_position" with role=stop. Stops/platforms should be the top of the relation before the ways/roads. If both stop+platform are used for an individual stop, the order is stop1-platform1-stop2-platform2... (i.e.stop before platform).

role=station isn't valid in PTv2. A station should have an empty role, but ideally a stop and/or platform should be used instead.

Also, light_rail routes (e.g. at Stansted Airport) are flagged as invalid just because light_rail wasn't mentioned in the PTv2 proposal!
Viking Link (2021-05-20 20:03:48+00:00): Hi kahlon,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/864526966/history is not a culvert, in reality there is a bridge above!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-08-24 06:08:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825711164 - why you removed building tag?
Paul_012 (2020-11-01 20:06:44+00:00): This edit, along with changeset 93155272, messed up the geometry of the entire area, and has been reverted.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-10-28 05:36:29+00:00): May be a continuation of fictional mapping by the user austin51 who was banned after making similar edits in this general location.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3212
naveenpf (2020-10-30 15:13:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93156630
topius (2020-10-28 13:44:31+00:00): What criteria did you use in modifying the road types? I suggest you have a look at the East Africa Tagging Guidelines, which are the basis on which to make decisions also for Papua New Guinea. The tertiary roads that you reverted to unclassified should in my view qualify as important enough to be tagged as tertiary roads.
pkzfwr (2020-10-28 14:39:18+00:00): The roads I changed to Unclassified roads are gravel or non-paved roads with a width of about 3-4 meters, vehicles cannot pass each smoothly on most of these sections. Usually there's no vehicles pass by for an hour or two, no one use these roads as a connection between major destinations.  I have been to many places around the highlands of Papua New Guinea and I have photos of these modified roads.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-16 10:47:53+00:00): لماذا تم حذف العنصر التالي:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12rP
keithonearth (2020-10-28 06:27:47+00:00): I should have tagged the source of this changeset as "survey", as I checked the addresses in person, and made notes.
DiahW IRM-ED (2023-01-12 10:23:44+00:00): Hi, Adi Husaini.

Thank you for your mapping contribution! Currently, I'm doing remote mapping to validate the existing rail network.

I especially need your assistance with this railway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/864540097)
In the changeset history, I noticed you added the tag "Layer=-1" to this railway. Do you actually realise this rail has a different layer than other rails? 

Because I found an issue, this rail crossing with this major highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/402809375) both of which have the tag layer=-1. 
Is there any information you can provide to resolve this issue?

I really appreciate any information and advice you provide. Thank you

Regards,
Diah
DiahW IRM-ED (2023-01-12 11:11:46+00:00): Sorry, I forgot to include the changeset history of the railway next to the one I was referring to in the issue above. You can view the history here (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/603173680)
Thank you
mariotomo (2021-10-20 15:38:47+00:00): hola Apple ADT, no me había dado cuenta que también iban a editar el Caribe y que también eran capaces de hacerlo mal!
I didn't expect your team to be able to provide low quality contributions even on the Caribbean side.
you have added lots of points for this island, but you did not recognize that part of it is just very low water, not dry land.
you could have split natural=wood from natural=scrub, and mapped the beaches.  it would take time, and it would be useful.
mariotomo (2021-10-20 15:40:52+00:00): to reduce the above statement, I'm not absolutely sure of my interpretation of the aerial pictures, so I'm not doing anything here.  we have a local person in the Telegram group, whom you can ask, if you care to make use of the available communication channels.
aweech (2020-10-28 19:44:40+00:00): Hi,
The paved and unpaved surface types are generic values, and more specific values such as asphalt are preferred. It is challenging to distinguish different unpaved surface types from imagery, but it is usually easy to tell asphalt from concrete and paving stones, so the more specific surface=asphalt should be used. In this edit, you also changed some ways that were tagged with surface=asphalt to surface=paved which is not good. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface for more information.

Also you added surface=paved to many nodes. You might be interested in the iD editor. It is accessed by pressing the Edit button on osm.org, and it is harder to make mistakes like that using it.

Happy Mapping!
BCNorwich (2020-10-28 10:07:20+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Has the bicycle parking been removed? If not would you please reinstate it.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-11-07 20:01:44+00:00): OK no response so I've reinstated it.
Prusaker (2020-10-28 07:34:44+00:00): Там нет ограничения 90. Там в одну сторону 40 км/ч знаком, в другую - 60, как и был обозначено до того.
Prusaker (2020-10-28 07:36:14+00:00): Там же скорость обозначена - в одну сторогну знаком 70, в другую - 90.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
johnny_1982 (2021-07-12 17:46:48+00:00): Am 12.07.2021 stand hier (wieder) ein Telefon.
Dimacn (2020-10-28 17:39:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы нарушаете правила оформления объектов в OSM. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Пожалуйста удалите текст из тега name
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-28 09:55:51+00:00): Hoi Jaap. Hoezo heb je naar de Engelstalige wikipedia pagina gelinkt? De Nederlandse was toch prima?
jaap de vries (2020-10-28 09:57:42+00:00): Ik heb enkel de fixme aangepast zoals dat aangegeven was. Dit geldt voor veel bedrijven zo.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-28 09:59:44+00:00): Osmose's oplossingen zijn niet altijd beter, daar komt ook eigen inzicht bij kijken. Voor een secundaire taal kun je hier brand:wikipedia:en=Zeeman (store) toevoegen volgens de wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_languages
jaap de vries (2020-10-29 09:05:27+00:00): Helaas heb ik niet met osmose gewerkt. Ik heb ook een aantal van jouw hand gevonden .  Hier ook met de Engelse wiki : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2761138097
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-29 10:45:13+00:00): Jup, da's er één die ik een tijd geleden zonder verder te kijken van Osmose heb gekopieerd. Wanneer ik daar weer edit, pas ik hem aan.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-28 10:07:53+00:00): Hoi Jaap. De naam Blokker Holding bestaat niet meer. Daarom heb ik naar de wiki van de nieuwe merknaam gelinkt: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirage_Retail_Group
jaap de vries (2020-10-29 09:06:54+00:00): Je reageert op mijn wijziging maar zelf doe je het ook verkeerd https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2761146848 ect ect !
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-29 10:43:03+00:00): Goede kritische blik. Je hebt gelijk. N.B. Dit is er wel één die ik al lang niet meer heb aangeraakt. Wanneer ik weer een edit in Bennekom doe, pas ik hem aan.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-29 11:38:30+00:00): Update: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93233907
dgitto (2020-10-28 16:50:46+00:00): Ciao, stai attento a ridisegnare le geometrie degli edifici (come https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122929152). In quest'area gli edifici sono stati faticosamente ricalcati dalla carta tecnica regionale 1:2000 e infatti sono chiaramente di qualità superiore rispetto a tante altre zone d'Italia.
Certo questo non significa che se un palazzo è stato abbattuto e rifatto non si debba modificare.
mapper999 (2022-01-29 21:03:09+00:00): Hi, diese Längenbegrenzung ist immer noch in den Daten. Ist das noch aktuell?
Nakaner (2022-01-30 14:26:30+00:00): Hallo,

die Längenbegrenzung existiert nicht mehr. Ich habe extra in meine Mapillary-Bilder vom Dezember 2021 geschaut.

Viele Grüße

Michael
mapper999 (2022-01-30 19:03:32+00:00): Danke, ich habs gelöscht. Das maxlength-Tag auf der Kriegsstraße auf Höhe der neuen Haltestelle Karlstor hab ich ebenfalls gelöscht, da dann vermutlich auch nicht mehr aktuell.
nevw (2020-10-28 09:10:21+00:00): Hi, welcome to the OSM.
What do the following tags you added mean? Are they documented on the osm wiki?
[object Event]=yes
[object FocusEvent]=yes
nevw (2020-11-02 10:55:44+00:00): I removed tags unknown in OSM mapping.
[object Event]=yes
[object FocusEvent]=yes
spiregrain (2020-10-28 09:04:16+00:00): Morning - thanks for looking into this.  You seem to ave removed a brick shed from here - did you mean to?

It's possible your edit crossed lines with my Changeset: 93164743.   That one tried to repair the geometry of said shed.   But it was orthogonal when I left it.
BCNorwich (2020-10-28 09:37:02+00:00): Hi, Sorry about that I was looking to amend the shed outline as it showed up in OSM Inspector. I couldn't see exactly where the shed should be, I thought I had backed out with no change but I was obviously wrong. I've now reverted my change here so I'll leave it to you.

Regards Bernard.
spiregrain (2020-10-28 09:44:51+00:00): Done! (as  93169849).  That's my micromapping for the day!

Thanks,

Ken
jonorossi (2020-10-29 02:10:44+00:00): Was layer=1 on the building intentional? If so, what for? I'm curious because I don't understand the need.

Nice work on the upgrades, I think quite a few of those shops no longer exist though, but that's another problem.
Tech Dec (2020-10-29 07:58:26+00:00): The layer=1 was to put it above the paths going through it (iD threw a warning at me that they intersected). Is that not right? I'll go read up on the wiki how layers are meant to be used.
jonorossi (2020-10-29 08:38:04+00:00): Ah, but the building is not an overpass over the footpath. Interestingly you can get rid of the warning by just splitting the footway and joining it to the boundary, I'd do that and tag it highway=corridor+indoor=yes.
Branko Kokanovic (2020-10-29 13:07:17+00:00): Zdravo, revertovao sam ovu izmenu. Uklonio si "neighbourhood" tag sto nije isravno. Za ove kuce sto si uklanjao, to je mozda ispravno, ali nisam siguran? Vidim da ih nema na satelitu, ali ti snimci su stari, mozda su novije? Mogu da se prosetam do tamo da proverim?

Hvala sto si se uopste iscimao da editujes OSM!
czubi (2020-10-28 09:33:15+00:00): ergänzt
area=yes ist überflüssig, building =house hat gefehlt ;-)
Miguel Pedr (2020-11-01 18:38:09+00:00): Hola,
Aquí los datos estaban bien antes, pero aunque se hicieron cambios aquí, se modelaron de manera incompleta y dejaron las carreteras que se cruzan en el cruce como superpuestas y también dejaron sin asignar las carreteras de un solo sentido que afectarán la ruta, los datos deben modelarse completamente para obtener buenos datos de mapas. Tenga cuidado con las direcciones en los cruces para una buena ruta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93166502
tangomapper (2020-11-03 20:16:13+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thank you for catching this and correcting the one way direction!
eggie (2020-10-28 10:20:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review..  Je hebt de naam Praca toegevoegd aan het kerkhof. Waarom?
Why adding the name-Praca at the cemetery?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-28 11:53:30+00:00): reverted by changeset #93177947
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
czubi (2020-10-28 09:37:17+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93168904#map=19/50.98157/11.56927&layers=N
müllers (2020-10-28 10:53:39+00:00): Hallo czubi,
danke für die Korrekturen. Bist du in der Lage dem Straßenzug (Gönnabach) den Namen zuzuordnen? Wenn ich den Straßenzug anwähle, kommt auch der Bereich der Dorfstraße. Ich kann keine Teilstücke erstellen.
MfG
muellers
czubi (2020-10-28 14:14:07+00:00): Habs eingebessert, erstmal provisorisch
Mehrere Fragen:
1. Heißen die Straßen im Dorf wirklich noch "Dorfstraße" oder "Altengönna"?
2. Bis wohin geht "Gönnabach" (Ri. W)?
Habs mal bis zum Beginn des Friedhofs gemacht, kann aber auch sein das es noch weiter Ri. W geht
müllers (2020-10-30 08:07:56+00:00): Bis zum Friedhof ist richtig. Ich habe es etwas verdreht geschrieben. Dorfstraße ist der noch ursprüngliche Name. Nach der Eingemeindung heißt es jetzt Altengönna.

Nochmals Danke u. ein schönes Wochenende
muellers
AnonymousAlligator (2020-10-28 16:16:57+00:00): Hi! Just to let you know, I've made a couple changes to your edit:

- I've removed the description tag--advertising copy isn't allowed on OpenStreetMap.
- I fixed the formatting of a couple tags.

Thanks for adding your business to the map!
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:38:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Zandu (2023-11-16 18:37:55+00:00): Just adding the cycleway to the highway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93168299
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.