piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
miche101 (2018-12-20 09:36:13+00:00): Ja das ist der "Wunschname" den Sie auf dem Briefumschlag haben möchten.. hat aber weniger damit zu was vor Ort ist und auch nicht mit dem Firmennamen im Impressum/Datenschutzerklärung. 

Aber es wiedersprich der örtlichen Mappingpraxis "Metzgerei", Bäcker, Friseur.. usw. mit im Namen aufzuführen.. wenn das Tagging sehr eindeutig ist, wie hier.. ist auch nicht erforderlich für die OSM Suchfunktion..

Aber grundsätzliche Dinge brauche wir jetzt nicht hier in einem Changeset diskutieren.. wenn dann im Forum. 

Gruß miche101
muralito (2018-12-18 13:21:23+00:00): Improveosm oneway suggestions are not always right, because of directionality changes, drivers do not respect the oneway rule, and other problems that cannot be solved without survey.

Did you survey it?
conorsh (2018-12-18 11:18:04+00:00): This change is actually to add the community allotment - not about Cowley Park!
trigpoint (2018-12-18 12:30:10+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit. 
I have just spotted a Lloyds TSB on the High Street and as you are local I wonder if you could correct it.
Thanks Phil
conorsh (2018-12-18 12:33:21+00:00): Hi Phil, I'm fairly sure it's a Lloyds Bank now. I'll double-check and confirm soon.
BCNorwich (2018-12-18 13:05:01+00:00): Hi, if the pub building is still there but not used as such it is recommended to tag it disused:name=???  and disused:amenity=???  Thus the history is retained and other folk won't be inclined to map it again. If it reopens the tags can then again be amended.

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:

Regards Bernard.
conorsh (2018-12-18 16:18:26+00:00): Thanks. The building itself is no longer a pub and is part of George Barnsdale.
Sosha1996 (2018-12-20 23:37:38+00:00): رسمتون اشتباه بوده، شما برای استفاده از تگ leisure=swimming_pool باید فقط محدوده‌ی آب رو بکشید و بعد بهش این تگ رو بدید.
gormo (2018-12-18 11:56:36+00:00): ...hu? Ich hatte als Änderungssatzkommentar "Doppeltes Ferienhaus gelöscht" setzen wollen.
kosdp (2019-06-01 08:08:14+00:00): Objects added wrong way
SomeoneElse (2019-06-01 08:28:58+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add things to OpenStreetMap that don't exist, or change things into things that they are not.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-06-01 08:29:14+00:00): Привет,
Пожалуйста, не добавляйте вещи в OpenStreetMap, которые не существуют, и не превращайте вещи в вещи, которыми они не являются.
С уважением,
Энди
user_10143852 (2020-10-08 08:25:58+00:00): Why do these nodes have rcn_refs?
Zulu99 (2020-10-11 07:33:31+00:00): Hello jamesnhero

Thanks for reminding of those. Was just checking out how they rendered in OpenCycleMap. I've now taken them out. It will take about two weeks before they disappear off the map.

The numbers show how bike navigation is done in Belgium, Netherlands, etc. Just seeing how it could work in Melbourne:

http://www.bigyak.net.au/knooppunten/inumbering.html

Regards

Zulu99

Also see:    http://www.bigyak.net.au/trails/biketrails.html
spiregrain (2018-12-18 14:16:45+00:00): Hi there.   I used to work on the Athletes Vilalge/East Village site during the refurbishment process.  (In 2013/14).   In those days the northern boundary of the East Village was Honour Lea Avenue.   The Chobham Manor stuff definitely counted as a separate development, which opened quite a lot later.   On that basis, way 179420174 bounds too large an area.   (But of course, since my day, it could be that the East Village definition has been stretched north a bit).
rskedgell (2018-12-18 15:22:01+00:00): I've always thought of Chobham Manor as separate too, but didn't really want to touch the geometry of the place=neighbourhood way, just remove the landuse tag. It's probably worth splitting into separate neighbourhoods and perhaps adding others for the other residential developments around QEOP if they don't already exist.
rskedgell (2018-12-20 15:50:31+00:00): Chobham Manor (bounded by Abercrombie Road, Temple Mills Lane, Honour Lea Avenue and Olympic Park Avenue) has now been split into a separate place=neighbourhood area from East Village. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65637464
spiregrain (2018-12-20 16:18:27+00:00): Thanks Rob - that matches my mental model of the places.   

I had a quick look at the Newham planning portal map earlier, and they only seem to have Keirin Road from all the Chobham Manor roads.   (Naturally, the LLDC planning portal doesn't have maps).   

So another win for OSM!
mueschel (2018-12-19 09:50:00+00:00): Hi,
these hospitals all have strange, foreign tags that should not be uploaded to the OSM database.
Please spend some time and adapt them to common tags that can be understood by other OSM users.

Jan


    CODE_AS=0
    CODE_NOM=0
    CODE_PRO=0
    CODE_ZS=0
    LATITUDE=0.3789467
    LONGITUDE=29.37427
    NOM_AS=KABASHA
    NOM_ZS=KALUNGUTA
    OBJECTID=0
    PAYS=RDC
    PROVINCE=NORD-KIVU
    SOURCE=OMS-SNIS
    STATUT=0
    TYPE_CODE=0
    TYPE_NAME=CENTRE PSYCHIATRIQUE
    editdate={FCE77360-352E-4554-B0CB-6AD55F31A933}
    editedby=FABIEN
    globalid=to display at city level
R0bst3r (2018-12-19 10:29:12+00:00): Hallo Ingmar Klaus,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Mehr Infos rund um OSM bekommt man unter learnosm.org oder wiki.osm.org.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65579002
hackthemap (2020-09-13 14:48:12+00:00): Hey merlin6904 :)

Thanks for your contributions!
The packstation tagging is not right and therefore it might be hard for this data to be used by some applications.
You can see the correct tagging here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Packstation

Could you change that? If you need any help or can't change it, just say something!
Link to edit the packstation node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=6144973881#map=19/50.08852/8.74885

Best,
hackthemap
hackthemap (2021-04-27 12:43:09+00:00): Thanks for correcting it! :)
I also removed the description and especially name since this can be easily derived from the other tags and the name should only contain signposted names of e.g. shops and similar, not describing what the thing is.
11daf (2018-12-27 18:38:23+00:00): Добрый день. У Вас на Заречной улице два дома с номером 8 и два дома с номером 33. В одном пакете правок.

Можно поинтересоваться источником данных? Очень плохое качество.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Sosha1996 (2018-12-29 11:40:46+00:00): واقعا این طرز نام‌گذاری به شدت ایراد داره.
southglos (2019-01-10 11:54:20+00:00): Ok, genuinely intrigued.  "Dave"?

:-)
ndm (2019-01-10 19:48:39+00:00): A feline "in memoriam" - if memory serves correctly.
Jakka (2018-12-18 17:20:27+00:00): Mons Expo (6145110085, v1) n' a aucune sens c'est quoi ? bâtiment groupe bâtiment ....j’efface
ndm (2018-12-18 13:57:28+00:00): What routing issue are you trying to fix?
ndm (2018-12-18 13:57:23+00:00): What routing issue are you trying to fix?
ndm (2018-12-18 13:57:16+00:00): What routing issue are you trying to fix?
literan (2018-12-18 20:23:38+00:00): highway=pedestrian для пешеходных улиц и площадей (именованных, как Арбат). А роутинг по площадям еще никто не смог придумать
ghost_07 (2018-12-19 08:26:11+00:00): Учту. Откатить? Дошло, кстати, почему никто не смог сделать роутинг. В свое время ковырятлся в исходниках OSRM. По идее это классическая задача программирования по поиску кратчайшего пути в лабиринте. Но! В общем случае там может быть очень неэффективное решение и роутинг будет жутко тормозить. Помогли бы предварительные расчеты и кеширование возможных путей, но это целая история и заметная переделка всего роутингового движка. Ну и железо серверов где роутинг считается возможно обновлять бы пришлось.
literan (2018-12-19 08:35:26+00:00): Да я уже исправил на area:highway=footway+surface=paving_stones. Насчет роутинга по площадям, если не ошибаюсь, кто-то из разработчиков (Османда?) рассказывал, что это требует каких-то чудовищных вычислительных ресурсов, и смартфоны до такого еще не дошли. Кстати, слышал про новый мобильный софт на базе OSM - Galileo? Для андроида есть, и работает очень неплохо, даже быстрее чем мапсми, как показалось. Для ios обещали вскоре выпустить.
ndm (2018-12-18 13:56:59+00:00): What routing issue are you trying to fix?
baloona (2018-12-19 13:37:39+00:00): Hello ndm - have a look at the geofabrik osm inspector: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
I just picked some of the marked issues.
In this changeset I connected the footways, which ended close to each other.
abakus_uploader (2018-12-18 23:30:42+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Michoo (2018-12-24 23:45:32+00:00): Widzę, że zmiana została już poprawiona w #65636816. Sorki za błąd.
viloan (2018-12-18 13:11:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
abakus_uploader (2018-12-18 23:30:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Jakka (2018-12-18 17:11:32+00:00): Al deze gebouwen zijn met de grond gelijk gemaakt. Is er al een nieuwe bestemmeing ervoor ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65580879#map=18/51.24346/4.68850&layers=N
kokoens67 (2018-12-18 18:25:55+00:00): Meer info: https://www.hln.be/regio/zoersel/anb-sloopt-vervallen-sjauwelhoeve~a001909f/
De afbraak is een paar weken geleden gestart.
viloan (2018-12-18 13:29:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
LucFreitas (2018-12-18 13:58:23+00:00): Montanhas ES
Solmaz33L (2018-12-18 14:09:25+00:00): Recently I was in the area, I really liked it, there are a lot of green parks and very clean airю
woodpeck (2018-12-28 10:30:12+00:00): In this changeset you have moved the whole coastal road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607569924 and thereby created many issues with smaller roads connecting to it. Please double check that you're working to correctly adjusted aerial imagery and if you move a large road like this, also check all the connecting roads. See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65581458 for a comparison of before-after.
siripurapu (2018-12-28 11:17:09+00:00): Hi Woodpeck,

Thanks for the feedback. Will check the edits and revert.

Thanks,
Siripurapu
siripurapu (2018-12-28 14:25:22+00:00): The highlighted road(Primary road) spanning across multiple cities was created by external mapper(Adiatma IRM-RV) on 13/07/2018 and is not in sync with any of the Imageries available in JOSM. 
I partly worked on this road segment to the extent it falls in the areas served by Grab(within Gorantalo city limits), which was part of my scope of work and corrected the alignment basis Bing and Digipremium. 
However, I would now go ahead and correct the entire stretch as it is not appropriate to leave the data misaligned.

scope of work basis Gorantlo city boundary considered - https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-cAPTPY9w4OI/XCYw25DIBcI/AAAAAAAACSc/r9grBcsKv1UyrbCQ2FvKuD7J5STJuMkewCL0BGAYYCw/h1080/2018-12-28.png

Existing data entire stretch misaligned - https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-BzJG1ONs7lM/XCYPI3Njj_I/AAAAAAAACSI/iUa4njsopHArE37pgx8JLJP7U3FGk7SMgCL0BGAYYCw/h833/2018-12-28.png.

I will confirm once corrections are done

Thanks,
Siripurapu
siripurapu (2018-12-28 15:05:23+00:00): Hi Woodpeck,
I have corrected the alignment for the specified stretch (Way ids: way 607569924 and way 655954594) - 
Adding Screenshots for reference
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-fbU08_gB79s/XCY7LvTkfmI/AAAAAAAAAGo/PWSXPIM5pmUm0AIV2zQN9lffWTsyIvtJgCL0BGAYYCw/h925/2018-12-28.png

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-ejoAiAnDcI4/XCY7RrvfhvI/AAAAAAAAAGw/0WkzTRCEw2IeXYk0L6FvRl4l667MQ94XACL0BGAYYCw/h952/2018-12-28.png

However, I have not done changes to the stretch going through Gorontalo as the road connectivity and buildings in this city are not in sync with any of the imageries. Please suggest.

Thank you.
viloan (2018-12-18 13:48:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Phyks (2018-12-18 14:45:51+00:00): Bonjour,

Je réagis à la demande de relecture. Je ne connais pas le terrain, quel est le type de piste cyclable le long du Bourlevard Camelinat ?

Telle qu'ajoutée sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655955745#map=19/48.81706/2.29444, c'est une piste séparée à sens unique.

D'après les photos aériennes, j'ai l'impression qu'il s'agit plutôt d'une bande, sans séparation physique avec les véhicules, et qu'elle devrait donc être directement sur la voie principale avec le tag "cycleway:left=opposite_lane".

Voir le cas M3a sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Bandes_cyclables_sur_les_routes_.C3.A0_sens_unique.

Bonne journée,
Maxime92 (2018-12-18 15:15:50+00:00): Bonjour
En effet, c'est une bande cyclable sans séparation physique. Malheureusement j'ignore comment corriger ma modification car je ne la vois pas sur la carte.
Cordialement,
Phyks (2018-12-19 09:45:37+00:00): Bonjour,

En cliquant sur "Modifier" pour aller dans l'éditeur, vous devriez pouvoir la sélectionner https://lutim.phyks.me/tO6fvvBi/WaVhlNaP.png puis la supprimer avec un clic droit et l'icône de poubelles.

Commençons par la voie au niveau de cette section du Boulevard : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99197572#map=19/48.81759/2.29319. Les informations de "cycleway" sont déjà sur le boulevard (opposite_lane), il n'y a donc besoin de rien de plus que de simplement supprimer la piste séparée.

Sur la section suivante, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553157596, il en est de même, il faudrait simplement supprimer la piste séparée.

Enfin, au niveau de la dernière section du boulevard, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391026093, la piste à contresens est bien une piste (séparée par le stationnement). Il n'y a rien à modifier ici, la description est correcte.

Il restera alors à relier la piste séparée (derrière le stationnement) avec la voie principale (au niveau de la description en termes de bandes cyclables). Comme ceci : https://lutim.phyks.me/8QL7uiH2/fNqjaS4W.png.

Je vous laisse faire ces modifications. N'hésitez pas à me demander si ce n'est pas clair ou si vous souhaitez une relecture finale :)

Bonne journée,
mavl (2018-12-24 17:12:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Luzandro (2018-12-18 17:30:18+00:00): Hallo andyp17,

der gelöschte Way war auch nicht als öffentliche Straße, sondern als privater Zufahrtsweg eingezeichnet, wobei es dem Luftbild nach wohl eher 2 Zufahrten ohne Verbindung (zumindest für Autos) sind
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92214391/history

Bei deiner 2ten Änderung hat bei der Kreuzung in Oberweinberg die Verbindung zur westlichen Straße gefehlt. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob das durch deine Änderung entstanden ist, ich habe es zumindest behoben

Zum Namen "Panoramaweg": gehört der wirklich zu der Straße zw. Unter- und Oberweinberg? Es gibt auch eine Wanderroute "Rundwanderweg Gemeinde Wiesfleck" die u.a. über diesen Abschnitt verläuft: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=8449530&map=16!47.3908!16.1732

LG Andreas
andyp17 (2018-12-19 06:58:13+00:00): Hallo,
Danke für deine Anmerkungen. Änderung 1 sind wirklich nur Hauszufahrten, gehören mMn nicht in die Karte. Änderung 2: kann wirklich sein, dass ich da ungewollt die Verbindung aufgemacht habe, danke fürs korrigieren. Panoramaweg stimmt zu 100% - wir haben ab 1. Dez. Straßenbezeichnungen bekommen und ich hab nur mal probiert, wie das hier funktioniert... Werde das dann Zug um Zug ändern... 
Danke!

mfg
Andreas
freebeer (2018-12-19 10:23:15+00:00): if it exists in reality, there is no reason not to have it on the map, and here it looks like a valuable addition when mapped and tagged correctly.

secondly, in germany, there is at least one firm which is paying to map private driveways as they are important to its business (foot access); same looks to be true elsewhere for amazon logistics and other services for their delivery drivers who presumably would in fact be able to use these private drives.
Luzandro (2018-12-20 06:31:05+00:00): Haben sich mit den Straßennamen auch die Adressen / Hausnummern geändert? Ich hatte bei meiner Korrektur auch gleich die Adressen für Weinberg im Burgenland vom BEV eingetragen und die Gebäude am Panoramaweg haben dann bspw. die Adresse

Weinberg im Burgenland 31
7423 Wiesfleck

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435773726#map=17/47.39089/16.16988

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Austria/Österreichisches_Adressregister
andyp17 (2018-12-20 06:56:42+00:00): Hallo,
Ja, es haben sich auch die Adressen der Objekte geändert. Ich werde diese nach und nach aktualisieren... Danke!
mfg
andyp17 (2018-12-18 13:59:50+00:00): Sraßenbezeichnung hinzugefügt
Syl (2018-12-21 22:44:00+00:00): Hello, that is your source? Buildings are in constructions here for years.
jguthula (2018-12-24 10:28:22+00:00): Hi syl,

Yes we used BDOrtho IGN and Mapillary as a source to verify road connectivity for these edits. Is there any mistake me made in this case?

Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
Syl (2018-12-30 17:52:32+00:00): This road doesn't exist since years, a building is in construction here.
Before adding a missing road in an construction area please check why it's missing!
I have revert your change.
jguthula (2019-01-01 07:20:58+00:00): Thanks for your inputs Syl, going forward we will be extra cautious of the construction areas. 

Do let us know If there are any recommendations or suggestions. We will  consider it as a top priority before making any edit.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
skorasaurus (2019-09-22 19:14:04+00:00): there is not a bridge here; I've since fixed it.
Jakka (2018-12-18 16:58:01+00:00): dit gebouw hangt niet vast aan "gebouw A" max inzoomen Cafetaria & Ingang (655962005, v1) ook hier foute benaming "cafetaria" gans gebouw ? ingang kan maar op één node zijn entrance=* zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance
Tim De Meyer (2018-12-18 20:12:03+00:00): Gebouw staat met 2 verdiepingen "tegen"gebouw a. Enkel top is vrijstaand (om middels lichtstraat licht binnen te laten op onderste verdiep van blok A. (is mijn werkplek..) Cafetaria omvat volledige outline van het gebouw, intern is trap naar ingang
StephaneP (2018-12-28 15:16:22+00:00): Bonjour tykayn,

Je viens de voir tes ajouts de piste cyclable, mais j'ai l'impression qu'il s'agit, au mieux, de bande cyclable. Les pistes sont séparée de la chaussée, et pas les bandes.
D'ailleurs, il est déjà indiqué sur la route, qu'il y a des bandes :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180256122

Qu'en est-il sur le terrain ?

Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
tykayn (2018-12-28 15:24:13+00:00): bonjour,
sur le terrain il s'agit bien de bandes de part et d'autre de la route. elles sont d'ailleurs mal marquées sur une bonne partie, effacée par des travaux de voirie.
tykayn (2018-12-28 15:24:40+00:00): je viens de corriger en supprimant la ligne séparée que j'avais ajouté
StephaneP (2018-12-28 15:31:30+00:00): Super !!
Au passage, j'ai amélioré un peu la géométrie, et ai remarqué des historic=milestone, comme ce point : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6154306597
Les tags corrects sont :
emergency=fire_hydrant
Plus d'infos ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant
richlv (2018-12-27 17:38:38+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I noticed that this changeset added two untagged ways, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655966964 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655966965 - this duplicated some of the existing ways and did not seem useful so I have reverted this changeset. Please let me know if there was an intent I have missed.