piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
emersonveenstra (2023-02-26 14:29:18+00:00): Hi,

If you don't know the house number of a building, please leave it blank. Adding "????" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083552226#map=18/42.29718/-83.45225) is not helpful and will only confuse data consumers and users. Thanks!
MxxCon (2022-08-05 03:39:59+00:00): Hello.
When adding color or other tags, please ensure that they are in lower case. There are few exceptions, such as proper names, which can be capitalized, but wast majority of tags should be just lower case. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124442819
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-03 16:01:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124443167 where the changeset comment is: Reverting obvious vandalism
Jmapper007 (2022-08-04 22:34:39+00:00): Just... wow. Crazy what people will do these days.
Own Oh (2022-08-03 15:51:01+00:00): Is there any reason why the contraflow bike lanes on Parnell Square East leading to N Frederick St are not marked?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-03 16:01:56+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 124442865.
DaveF (2022-08-05 01:23:00+00:00): Can his page be removed? It contains a link to a viral download.
Branko Kokanovic (2022-08-04 21:04:18+00:00): Thanks for editing this part of the world. Enjoyed text on your profile page!:) Very, very small note: when you edit, watch not to move administrative borders - you changed one here (couple of meters, probably by accident!) between two villages in Serbia. Nothing important, I fixed it already here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124497408

Thanks again for making my day with "Mes alentours sont cartographiés - donc je suis"

----
Traduit automatiquement en français:

Merci d'avoir édité cette partie du monde. J'ai aimé lire le texte sur votre page de profil ! :) Très, très petite note : lorsque vous éditez, veillez à ne pas déplacer les frontières administratives - vous en avez changé une ici (quelques mètres, probablement par accident !) entre deux villages de Serbie. Rien d'important, je l'ai déjà corrigé ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124497408

Merci encore d'avoir embelli ma journée avec "Mes alentours sont cartographiés - donc je suis"
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Jillis inactivE (2022-08-10 17:34:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3308580
Jillis inactivE (2022-08-16 08:52:27+00:00): Kijk je svp ook naar deze opmerking: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3315951?  Bedrijven aan huis zetten we niet in OpenStreetMap, tenzij ze bezocht kunnen worden door klanten. Graag een reactie.
Jillis inactivE (2022-08-20 09:04:13+00:00): Hekken zoals bij de opritten aan de Crailoseweg zijn gates, geen swing_gates. Ik heb dit ook voor je gecorrigeerd, let je ajb voortaan op wat en hoe je mapt? Andere mappers (eggie, Leo Slager, ik) hebben m.i. teveel vervolgwerk aan het jouwe.
CaptainHolt (2022-08-20 10:03:25+00:00): O, ik gebruikte de zoekfunctie van ID Editor en dit kwam volgens de zoekfunctie het beste overeen. Ik heb bij al mijn aanpassingen zeker wat foutjes gemaakt - dat geef ik ook ruiterlijk toe - maar een deel van de fouten is ook gekomen door ID Editor (dat hebben we bij andere wijzigingensets ook al geconstateerd). Dus ik moet inderdaad beter opletten, maar ID Editor moet ook worden verbeterd, want anders zullen er nog meer mensen zijn die bepaalde, gelijkaardige fouten gaan maken.
legofahrrad (2022-08-08 10:45:01+00:00): Hi,
I'm wondering what "organic=yes;used" should mean. Can you explain?
You added it multiple times to different nodes, e. g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/824383456 or at this location, Café Heinrich.
It is barely used, see taginfo: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/organic=yes%3Bused
BCNorwich (2022-08-03 18:18:19+00:00): Please stop your vandalism. This is your map as well so it really doesn't make sense to do this. I think I've corrected your amendments.

Thanks & Regards Bernard
bkil (2022-08-06 19:16:22+00:00): Üdvözlet az OSM közösségében! Szeretném jelezni, hogy egy pontnak rendelkeznie kell egy olyan címkével is ami meghatározza annak fő funkcióját: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element Lehetne ez akár shop=stationery.
Frans S (2022-08-27 08:32:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Each building needs to be mapped individually.
residential areas are used around hamlets, villages etc.  Not like here,



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124445057
voteforpedro (2022-10-03 09:56:31+00:00): lol is that actually the name?
Mauls (2022-10-03 15:19:50+00:00): Lovers Walk Depot?

Yes, it really is:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brighton_Lovers_Walk_Traction_and_Rolling_Stock_Maintenance_Depot
voteforpedro (2022-10-13 15:18:37+00:00): Love it
Frans S (2022-08-27 09:15:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building and tagged as residential area.
Each building needs to be mapped individually.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124445273
Frans S (2022-08-26 11:17:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.

C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.s



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124445555
muchichka_s (2022-08-04 05:25:48+00:00): Схоже, що то опечатка сайта з новинами. На Facebook міськради "Академіків Линників" https://www.facebook.com/officalpageBilaTserkva/photos/pcb.5286354998152287/5286354104819043/
user_6110846 (2022-08-04 15:49:22+00:00): я виправлю мені назва здивувала
user_2066394 (2022-08-04 13:48:04+00:00): Der Changeset-Kommentar wäre als Fehlerhinweis sinnvoll.
Walter542018 (2022-08-04 17:22:45+00:00): Sorry, den Kommentar von wurzelast verstehe ich nicht. 
Der Changeset-Kommentar ist ist als Fehlerhinweis von mir gedacht.
Gibt es dafür noch ein extra Feld?
zur Info: "Steinkreis" ist das Kreuz auf der Karalpe.
user_2066394 (2022-08-04 18:28:56+00:00): Es ging um den Bezug zur Brennhütte, die kommt in dem Changeset nicht vor, sondern hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124445389
tomhukins (2022-08-04 16:35:13+00:00): Thank you for helping to improve the map.  I noticed there were "Cromford Mills" and "Cromford Mill Museum" nodes very nearby for the same thing.  I have merged these in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124488855 and added more details to the remaining node.
DeBigC (2023-01-04 09:51:12+00:00): Would you mind reviewing "The Scutch Mill" here as there appears to be some mess where the relation you created doesn't have an outer style. I am validating the rest of the tile
b-unicycling (2023-01-04 11:01:47+00:00): Are you sure I mapped this? There is nothing about the name on the BWO map.
b-unicycling (2023-01-04 11:14:33+00:00): Turns out it's not a name, it's a type of mill.
VictorIE (2022-08-05 21:30:24+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9929977368

When you say not:operator:wikidata=Q482490 Do you mean this post office is An Post branded, but operated by an agent? We generally haven't made that distinction, with 3,000+ post objects mapped.
Own Oh (2022-08-05 21:33:00+00:00): No idea what its status is, it's a shop unit within the centre.
felipeeugenio (2022-08-14 20:58:28+00:00): Hola. Misma pregunta para esta edición. Son pasos que se van a abrir después? por que además al borrarlo dejó abierta la restricción de doblar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124446160
AngocA (2022-08-10 00:39:07+00:00): Hola Telepalmeritas. Aquí también veo que borraste una edifición, la cual aún aparece en la imagen satelital Por qué borraste la construcción?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124446257
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 12:01:59+00:00): Invertí la edición.
MatthieuMartin (2022-08-04 21:09:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124497013
J-MUC (2022-08-05 10:28:35+00:00): Hallo santon,

Du machst immer wieder Änderungen von mir im Werksviertel rückgängig, z.B. ein von mir eingezeichnetes Tor zunächst als Drehkreuz ein paar Meter weiter zweckentfremdet, jetzt das von mir wiederhergestellte Tor erneut gelöscht.

Darf ich fragen, was es damit auf sich hat?

Danke!

Viele Grüße 

J-MUC
santon (2022-08-05 16:44:24+00:00): Hallo, tut mir leid, wenn ich richtige Änderungen falsch geändert hätte. Allerdings entwickelt sich die Baustelle recht dynamisch. Das Drehkreuz bei der Wiese z.B. wurde abgebaut und knapp hinter den TZII wieder aufgebaut. Seit Dienstag in Betrieb.
Da ich die letzten paar Tage einige Änderungen gemacht habe, weiß ich jetzt nicht, welche Änderungen du genau meinst. Übrigens: Ich arbeite dort, komme also recht regelmäßig dort vorbei.
Viele Grüße
santon
J-MUC (2022-08-05 18:12:05+00:00): Hallo santon,

danke für die Nachricht! Ja, die Entwicklungen in dem Gebiet sind sehr dynamisch, komme fast täglich daran vorbei, auch am Wochenende.

Insofern habe ich auch die Verschiebung des Drehkreuzes mitbekommen. Rechts vom jetzigen Standort befindet sich allerdings zusätzlich ein breites, doppeflügeliges Tor im Zaun, nehme an u.a. als Feuerwehrzufahrt (analog zu einem weiteren solchen Tor weiter nordwestlich am Zaun).

Habe dieses Tor nun wiederhergestellt.

Außerdem habe ich mir erlaubt, das im Abriss befindliche Gebäude wiederherzustellen. Statt es komplett aus OSM zu entfernen, ist es in der Regel sinnvoller, ein lifecycle prefix zu nutzen, solange das Objekt noch in Luftbildern zu sehen ist.

Schau bitte einfach zukünftig ein bisschen, was "um Dich rum" passiert, nicht nur in der Realität, sondern auch in OSM. Wenn ein Objekt in jüngster Zeit erst eingetragen und mehrfach von jemand anders bearbeitet wurde, ist es unwahrscheinlich, dass eine Löschung ohne Rücksprache/Verifikation sinnvoll ist.

Danke!

Viele Grüße

J-MUC
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Woazboat (2025-09-09 21:54:44+00:00): Hallo Jgaordhelagenornres, 
du hast hier vor ein paar Jahren beim Toni Adam-Dr.Obersteiner-Biwak am Grimming den `tourism=wilderness_hut` Tag hinzugefügt. Die Biwakschachtel war davor bereits (und ist immer noch) mit `amenity=shelter` + `shelter type=basic_hut` getaggt. 

Von diesen Tags sollte eigentlich nur einer der beiden Varianten vorhanden sein. `basic_hut` wird dabei für kleine Biwakschachteln / Notschlafstellen verwendet, `wilderness_hut` für etwas größere Hütten mit Feuer-/Kochstelle.

Ich denke nicht dass die Biwakschachtel eine Kochstelle hat, oder? Die `amenity=shelter` + `shelter type=basic_hut` Tag-Kombination wäre dann zutreffender und der `tourism=wilderness_hut` Tag sollte entfernt werden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dbasic_hut

lg, Woazboat
Jgaordhelagenornres (2025-09-10 17:37:12+00:00): Hallo Woazboat,

wie ich dank der Links feststellen konnte, hast du recht.
Und nicht nur beim Grimmingbiwak, sondern auch bei der Schoberhütte und beim Praxbiwak ist jetzt auch der falsche tag drin. Werde ich wieder retourändern.
Danke für den Hinweis!
LG
Woazboat (2025-09-10 18:11:53+00:00): Super, vielen Dank!
lg
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-08-16 10:42:09+00:00): Hvad er Danmarokk ?
b-holdet (2022-08-16 20:07:17+00:00): https://datacvr.virk.dk/enhed/produktionsenhed/1027279178
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-08-16 21:01:23+00:00): Ja, det er et firma, men det skal have et fysisk tag.
MatthieuMartin (2022-08-04 21:10:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124454482
SzymonH (2022-08-04 12:57:16+00:00): Cześć! Zamierzasz się może w jakimś większym stopniu zajmować aktualizacją tras i relacji transportu publicznego w Krakowie?
Jillis inactivE (2022-08-16 18:34:53+00:00): Svp ook naar https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3317337 kijken. Dit is op z'n hoogst een kantoor (maar hoort m.i. ook niet in OSM)
CAI Stabia (2022-08-04 08:08:50+00:00): Ivan ti chiediamo di astenerti dal cancellare le ref dal nome delle way, ove non preventivamente concordato  con le sezioni CAI  di Castellammare di Stabia e Cava De Tirreni. E' una nostra precisa scelta e ci costringi ad un surplus di lavoro inutile per il ripristino. Qualsiasi ulteriore modifica in tal senso  verrà considerata vandalismo
Jrachi (2022-08-04 08:20:19+00:00): Ciao.
Non capisco come una sezione CAI possa cambiare le regole della wiki!
mettere il ref sul nome del sentiero ha l'unica utilità di essere visualizzato su alcuni rendering, mentre su altri potrebbero ripeterlo due volte.

Ivo, Jrachi
CAI Stabia (2022-08-04 08:25:46+00:00): Non vi chiediamo di capire, ma di rispettare il lavoro altrui, in altra sede più opportuna saremo lieti di spiegarvi le motivazioni di questa scelta.
ivanbranco (2022-08-04 08:31:07+00:00): Il rispetto non lo si ottiene sicuramente minacciando di segnalare per vandalismo gli utenti che modificano seguendo le linee guida della comunità.

Vedo ora che 5 minuti fa hai modificato l'alt_name di una via avente nome proprio (Via Ieranto) mettendogli come valore il ref del sentiero che passa di lì. Anche in quel caso è errato, dubito che un vicano si riferisca a Via Ieranto come "351" e venga compreso da altri vicani in riferimento a quella specifica via. I ref sono ref, non sono nomi così come non sono nomi alternativi.

Se pensate abbia torto aprite una discussione in mailing list, che è una delle "sedi opportune" in cui discute la comunità di OpenStreetMap.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-09 11:08:09+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and applied correct tagging for World of Smoke & Vape POI in changeset 183869582

https://osm.org/changeset/183869582
Bienson (2022-08-03 22:08:31+00:00): Ich verstehe nicht ... Das Luftbild und das Foto sind doch eindeutig. Im Luftbild ganz klar zu erkennen (durch langen Schatten) und auf dem Foto Position auch ersichtlich (rechts neben dem Baum aus der Perspektive frontal zum Gebäude, also südwestliche Ecke des "Plateaus"). Was übersehe ich?
Panda 320 (2022-08-04 20:18:13+00:00): Jo, stimmt, da hat mir mein Gedächtnis ein Schnippchen geschlagen.
Ich hatte nicht in Erinnerung, dass da ein Plateuas ist, was ich in der Nahauflösung übersehen habe.
Sorry, bitte zurück versetzen.
Panda 320 (2022-08-04 20:18:34+00:00): Danke.
Panda 320 (2022-08-05 18:52:14+00:00): Erledigt.
RicoElectrico (2022-08-04 01:20:32+00:00): 
Cześć, w temacie ratownictwa - jeśli znasz jakieś defibrylatory AED w Twojej okolicy, to będę wdzięczny za dodanie ich przez naszą mapkę: https://aed.openstreetmap.org.pl/

Pozdrawiam!
ovruni (2022-08-03 23:38:23+00:00): Hola, el uso de mayúsculas y abreviaciones como "Jr." esta desaconsejado.
Saludos
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may%C3%BAsculas
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_(no_hacer_esto)
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-09-27 17:33:04+00:00): Hi, do you think access=private could be added to the gate? I assume it's better supported by routers.
Zverik (2022-09-28 08:59:30+00:00): Yeah, sure, added it. Thanks for looking it up :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-11-24 20:15:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144420492 where the changeset comment is: Reverting allegedly Google-sourced changes prior to redaction.
Austrianton (2022-08-12 18:02:29+00:00): Somehow this change-set got a little bit big.
barefootstache (2022-08-16 21:43:30+00:00): The only reason it is big is that on the same upload two small changes were added. Confused why StreetComplete did it that way...
Austrianton (2022-08-16 21:54:07+00:00): StreetComplete can do sudden weird things sometimes.

And thanks a lot for the answer. Much obliged. Have a great day
map per (2023-01-11 10:01:40+00:00): Hallo barefootstache,

cycleway:left=lane war hier (1) eigentlich schon richtig eingezeichent, habs korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984435670
mapper65363 (2022-12-31 13:35:06+00:00): Hi,
is there a reason why you changed the tag for the stop-positions at the ROB (e.g. node 456762521) from public_transport=stop_positon to public_transport=platform? I ask because public_transport=platform is already mapped as a line and mapping a stop-position with public_transport=platform is not consistent with the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform)
DerZombiiie (2022-12-31 20:27:01+00:00): Hi,
No, there isn't I just didn't know any better.
mapper65363 (2023-01-01 09:42:02+00:00): I'll fix it then. Please read the wiki before changing things you haven't done before. If you have any questions you can ask me or any other mapper with some experience. Most of them will be happy to help. Especially if you are relativly new. And thanks for starting contribution to OSM.
pitfire (2022-08-04 04:11:53+00:00): Weg: 488944303
Bist Du sicher, das die Treppe "surface-asphalt" ist, Ich kenne die nur aus Beton.
pitfire (2022-08-04 03:50:33+00:00): Kiosk (130361557, v3)
Die Namen sollten nur den eigentlichen Namen des fraglichen Objekts enthalten und keine Kategorien / Typen, Beschreibungen,
Bienson (2022-08-03 22:00:54+00:00): "Frei schwebend" bringen die Poller nichts - Poller muss auf dem Weg liegen. Dann reicht auch ein barrier=bollard für mehrere Poller.
eggie (2022-08-03 22:37:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM..
Hint.. Please decrease your mapping area. This is an edit allover Germany and the Netherland. 
Hard to check.
Greetz
eggie
seattlefyi (2022-08-06 18:35:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for the helpful edit (and extra kudos for sticking to it until it was just right!). Looks like it had been very slightly incorrect for a long time. Thanks again and keep it up!
archie (2022-08-03 22:06:40+00:00): Hello, I am terribly sorry for my rude language, but this cs is really crab. By this cs you have inserted several highway=path (which includes: foot, bicycle and horse) on an in a vast, very  sandy beach area, where your footsteps can't be found an hour after you have had your walk there. I can just as well draw an other "path" beside one of yours. In other words all these "paths" are not verifiable at all. The only solid things out there are the boardwalks to give people som grip on top of the sand. So, these "paths" are a fantasy product. Once someone might have walked precisely along one of your "paths", but this we do not know of anymore. You might have forgotten to attatch the tag historic=yes to them.
I will start to draw my own "paths" there wright along. I once took a stroll out there. By the way did you notice this - my - path from the time I walked there?
archie (2022-08-03 22:52:15+00:00): @ A bit of an excuse from me. I now see that it wasn't you who draw those "paths" but another mapper. You have only edited this absurdety afterwards.
archie (2022-08-03 23:07:11+00:00): Well, it was you who put "trail_visibility" on one of the outers of the beach-mp (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145171542).
stigar (2022-08-04 00:30:24+00:00): Tack för att du noterade feltaggningen på outern. Korrigerat i CS 124456713.

Vad gäller pathens berättigande har jag ingen stark åsikt, men kan utifrån lokalkännedom meddela att det är ett populärt gång- och löpstråk, vilket också kan ses i Strava heatmap. Mycket riktigt syns den i regel inte på marken, vilket var anledningen till att jag, igen utifrån lokalkännedom, lade till visibility-tagen.

Jag accepterar din ursäkt, men det är inte första gången som du, för det första, inte lyckas läsa CS-historiken rätt och, för det andra, utifrån felaktiga slutsatser slänger anklagelser omkring dig i raljant och otrevlig ton. Lägg ner attityden och håll dig till saken. Det är inte värdigt en så imponerande produktiv användare som du. Nästa gång något av dina utbrott involverar mig kommer jag att inkomma med ett formellt klagomål till DWG.
archie (2022-08-04 06:29:48+00:00): Snälla vänta inte till nästa gång, gör det nu! Ett bättre sätt att blamera sig finns ju inte. Tillåt mig påminna om din kommentar till cs med dina ändringar (kontentan av den: en väg finns visserligen inte, men det skadar inte att editera en smula på det obefintliga och lägga till hinder på "vägen" med en "ford") "trail_visibility=horrible där paths normalt inte syns på stranden. ford=yes vid vadställe över bäcken. Knyt ihop paths på ett ställe. name -> note."
Jag vädjar till dig, gör det nu!
stigar (2022-08-04 07:29:02+00:00): Tack för att du mellan sarkasmutbrotten åtminstone försöker att diskutera i sak. Jag har som sagt ingen stark åsikt huruvida denna path är berättigad. Men kan du gå med på att *om* den ska finnas med, bör den lämpligen visibility-taggas?
archie (2022-08-03 22:19:29+00:00): Again, I am sorry for my crude language. 
Your "path" in this cs is 1 meter apart from the shoreline on a vast beach area? This is absolutly absurd! Have you ever been at a beach near the shoreline on a beach? You did not notice what happens to things at those places when the waves come rolling in to shore? Well I can tell you, they disapear! 
One of the principles of osm is, that things must be verifiable. These "paths" as you call them are not verifiable. They have disapeared after the latest wave a minute ago.
archie (2022-08-03 22:52:41+00:00): @ A bit of an excuse from me. I now see that it wasn't you who draw those "paths" but another mapper. You have only edited this absurdety afterwards.
philippec (2022-09-14 16:51:47+00:00): Gravenwezel Delhaize
Ik denk dat de volgorde van bank en vuilbak verkeerd is.
pi11 (2022-09-15 23:39:12+00:00): Inderdaad, daarnet bezocht, was me nog niet eerder opgevallen maar is enkele jaren geleden veranderd. Situatie met #126242891 rechtgezet. AED eveneens lichtjes verschoven. Bedankt!
philippec (2022-09-16 08:38:09+00:00): Er was grote file op de Antwerpse Ring, daardoor passeerde ik nog eens langs daar.  Vroeger liet ik passagiers daar bij het voorbijrijden uitkijken naar een AED.   Ze zagen hem nooit.  Dat zal nu beteren.
A67-A67 (2022-08-04 12:56:25+00:00): This is not a road under construction. I'll revert the changeset.