piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
geow (2022-07-11 20:12:20+00:00): Servus normalisdesned, ich bin grad über das access=no hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046093515 gestolpert. Ist da wirklich jeglicher Zugang verboten? Normal wär des ned ;-)
Grüße, geow
normalisdesned (2022-07-12 17:14:29+00:00): Hallo geow,
Da ist ein Zaun mit zutrittsverbot wegen Wildtieren.
Gruß
geow (2022-07-12 19:45:51+00:00): Ist das Verbot vielleicht zeitlich auf den Winter begrenzt? Wie hier z.B.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/382746861
geow (2022-07-12 20:11:30+00:00): Ich frage, weil ein ganzjähriges Betretungsverbot rechtlich kaum begründbar wär.
Danke,
geow
kakiremora (2022-04-23 14:33:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046096796
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/969863021

Dwa landuse'y nie powinny się pokrywać.

Pozdrawiam
JLZIMMERMANN (2022-08-17 07:57:31+00:00): Bonjour,
Cette bouche d'égout est dans une propriété privée, est-ce normal ?
man_made=manhole
manhole=sewer
ref=251757
source=CCPRO 2022
eggie (2022-03-29 09:01:54+00:00): Hoi.. 'k Zie dat de andere wegen allemaal de extra tag service=driveway hebben meegekregen. Eigenlijk een oprijlaan naar een woning. 
Wellicht dan consistent doorvoeren?
Dan rendert het gelijk aan de andere wegen.
.. en wanneer auto's niet geacht worden langs nr 6 te rijden lijkt me het correct.
Wellicht highway=path als er wel gefietst mag worden. 
MVG
eggie
jbelien (2024-02-11 12:52:16+00:00): Hello Milena, 
Thanks a lot for your contributions around trees.
Unfortunately "climbing tree" is not a concept that exists in OpenStreetMap (and isn't any tree a "climbing tree"?).
The tag sport=climbing is made for climbing sites and artifical climbs (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dclimbing) ; adding that tag on trees makes the search around climbing really confusing.
I've therefore removed the tags from the trees in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147326203
I've also removed links to photos including people (for privacy reason but also because the goal of the image tag is to show the object, not personal pictures) but of course kept the nice pictures of the trees.
Thank you for your understanding.
Have a nice day.
milenasonneveld (2024-02-14 12:24:27+00:00): Hello, that's all right. I suspected this may happen. Have a nice day!
demon_box (2022-03-29 16:52:16+00:00): ciao Ennio il tuo changeset titola "inserimento tratto strada" in realtà quella strada era già mappata e tu l'hai cambiata erroneamente da track a path.... non è 1 sentiero è una strada cementata, ci sono passato 15gg fa!!
DeKaN (2022-03-29 08:57:36+00:00): Добрый день, пожалуйста не используйте спутниковые снимки от Bing (у них смещение). Есть более свежие снимки от Maxar, которые не надо выравнивать (кроме тех, где асфальт чёрный, а не серый)
ViktKlos (2022-03-29 09:21:40+00:00): Здравствуйте! Замечание принял, буду использовать Maxar. Спасибо за обратную связь! Правки которые сделал подправлю под Maxar.
ViktKlos (2022-03-29 09:28:20+00:00): DeKaN, подскажите пожалуйста, включаю слой Maxar Premium Imagery но фон постоянно чёрный. Пробовал разные масштабы, результат тот же - чёрный фон. Работаю через браузер Microsoft Edge. Может, что делаю не так? Есть ли рекомендации?
DeKaN (2022-03-29 09:34:01+00:00): Возможно стоит попробовать другой браузер - у меня в Firefox без проблем показывает на масштабе 18 (или можно освоить JOSM)
philippec (2022-03-29 20:31:06+00:00): Mechelen Geerdegemstraat.
geen doorgaand verkeer meer
Dat is jammer.
CAI Stabia (2022-03-30 07:11:51+00:00): Ciao votiva non è un tag osm, correggi o elimina
giuseppemari (2022-03-30 08:00:19+00:00): Si lo so ma non posso correggere ora
Prossima settimana correggo con il giusto tag
giuseppemari (2022-04-03 18:20:48+00:00): l ho corretto
Tatti Barletta (2022-03-30 10:34:52+00:00): Mmh credo ci sia qualcosa di sbagliato, cosa intendevi fare?
Giovanni Buzzega (2022-03-30 10:46:02+00:00): L'applicazione StreetComplete mi chiedeva che tipo di colonnina era presente in quell'incrocio, e mi proponeva diversi tipi di paletto. Siccome ci sono dissuasori tipo "panettone" ho selezionato (in "altre risposte") "Non un paletto, ma un altro tipo di barriera". Forse avrei dovuto scegliere "fisso (non removibile)"?
ivanbranco (2022-03-31 20:43:53+00:00): Ciao Giovanni,

le immagini di StreetComplete avevano ingannato anche me. In realtà anche i "panettoni" sono "bollard". Quindi valgono le stesse regole :)
marczoutendijk (2022-04-02 11:35:06+00:00): Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
literan (2022-04-04 07:20:26+00:00): и какой толк в этом maxspeed=signals?

там подавляющую часть года ограничение 110. Вы взяли, и лишили навигаторы информации по скоростному режиму на одной из основных трасс страны.
literan (2022-04-04 07:21:11+00:00): любые массовые правки, тем более такие существенные, требуют согласования с сообществом. Дайте, пожалуйста, ссылку, где вы обсуждали эти замены?
literan (2022-04-04 07:25:05+00:00): тег, который вы использовали, не описан нигде в вики. Мало того, здесь https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:variable он описан как ошибочный.

Вы сами вернете корректные теги? или мне запросить у DWG полный откат всех ваших правок с данным описанием правки?
ZinaidaZ (2022-04-04 08:51:45+00:00): Добрый день! Я не считаю эти изменения ошибочными, так как в реальности установлены электронные табло, на которых скоростное ограничение может изменяться в зависимости от внешних условий и состояния дороги. Я использовала тег maxspeed=signals, как раз подходящий под описание из русскоязычной википедии. При этом я оставляла проставленное значение maxspeed:practical, которое было указано ранее. Готова исправить все maxspeed=signals, если в вики однозначно будет указано, что электронные табло ограничений скорости не учитываются.
ZinaidaZ (2022-04-04 08:56:27+00:00): Действительно, в приведенной Вами статье указано, что maxspeed:variable заменяет тег maxspeed=signals. Я согласна поменять signals на variable, думаю, это всех устроит.
В таком случае необходимо также исправить русскоязычную статью в вики, возьмете на себя?
literan (2022-04-04 16:54:19+00:00): о какой русскоязычной статье идет речь (которую вы предлагаете исправить)?

я так-то пользуюсь исключительно английской вики, т.к. в русской полно устаревшего хлама
ZinaidaZ (2022-04-04 17:45:30+00:00): Я говорю об этой статье https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:maxspeed
Просматриваю русскоязычную вики, чтобы найти информацию/соглашения специфичные для России
sipka (2023-01-15 18:02:33+00:00): Dobrý deň,
názov "Predný Holý vrch" bol prevzatý zo zoznamu "štandardizovaných geografických názvov" GKÚ. A keďže zákon NR SR č. 215/1995 Z. z. o geodézii a kartografii v znení neskorších predpisov stanovuje všeobecnú záväznosť štandardizovaných geografických názvov pre vydavateľov kartografických diel,... viac tu https://www.geoportal.sk/sk/zbgis/zbgis/geograficke-nazvoslovie/
, musí byť tento názov napísaný v správnom znení.
Bolo by vhodné aby ste to opravili naspäť. Ďakujem.
S pozdravom Sipka.
ggorzki (2023-01-16 14:29:25+00:00): Valid note. I set "Predný Holý vrch" as name and "Krajný Holý vrch" as the alternative name
Mannivu (2022-06-07 14:35:44+00:00): Scusa, i nomi delle cascine da dove arrivano? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167345899 questa non è una cascina, ma un condominio (per fare un esempio di tag errato)
user_5359 (2022-03-29 18:26:39+00:00): Welchem to OSM! What is the meaning of the key id for you?
Lesia23 (2022-03-30 08:51:30+00:00): Hello OSM! We can delete the key id, it is superfluous information. We apply these edits to the new pistes.
user_5359 (2022-03-30 09:18:01+00:00): If this is a internal reference, you can also use the key ref or ref:operator.
FATMAP_Mapping (2022-03-30 09:19:44+00:00): We will change it. Thank you!
user_5359 (2022-03-30 09:23:21+00:00): Please have also a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Piste_Maps
danieldegroot2 (2022-03-29 12:23:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9620446050
only a platform which is possibly used for fishing is visible. I've found something which is possibly a tower at
10.1628518, 124.1605926
(white object casting a shadow)

Regards,

Daniel
GOwin (2022-03-29 23:18:56+00:00): Thank you! It indeed looks like a match.

I was relying on a secondary description that said lighthouse was "on a sea platform" of some kind, but this seems to be an accurate match.
danieldegroot2 (2022-03-30 00:32:26+00:00): For one on a sea platform, there is a possible match at
10.1546217, 124.1940983
(at the center of an island at the end of a large pier); is however on Bohol side. no lighthouse listed (unless its elsewhere on the MR map..); otherwise, this could be
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9620485882/history
GOwin (2022-03-30 01:12:16+00:00): Thanks! I checked those coordinates, but they look doubtful, and doesn't appear to be a sea platform, though it looks like a small jetty.

The latter is a different lighthouse altogether.

Hey, if you're keen on mapping lighthouses, too, extra 👀 and  more  👐 are welcome: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/9928  😃
fukejs (2022-08-29 08:47:21+00:00): Hello. You changed the name of this place https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8754913188/history from 凤河营村 to 3 before 5 months. I guess it was unintentional mistake. Could you correct it?
SekeRob (2022-03-29 23:25:01+00:00): Colle Morino o Colle Marino come i primo parte?
procuste (2022-04-02 08:31:05+00:00): Dovrebbe essere Colle Morino, come scritto sui cartelli stradali. Ho controllato, anche altre mappe lo riportano così (tranne il sito di tuttocittà, che riporta entrambe le versioni).
SekeRob (2022-04-02 10:27:59+00:00): OK, da angolo con N27 segna 'N5 SC Colle Morino. Addizione source:name tag=corner sign. Anche crea una road relation per i 3 parti.

grazie
kaartjesman (2022-03-29 10:19:49+00:00): hey,
you asked for a review of this change. I have to point out that this is a rather massive change with loads of stuff happening. If there is anything specific that you were unsure about, please say so.

In general, it would be Ok to make a changeset only for all the partking, another for the store-tags updates etc.

Nothing stood out to me, other than it being a lot of details which is naturally awesome to have added in OSM. So great job adding so much useful details!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119060164
Kovoschiz (2022-03-29 12:36:31+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-29 12:36:59+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-29 10:14:12+00:00): Hello undrprssur,

Why have you changed the footpaths' tags from highway=footway to footway=footway?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-31 19:00:53+00:00): This is a duplicate and at the very least shouldn't have the building tag.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-29 12:37:22+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
user_12500175 (2022-03-29 12:11:24+00:00): Hallo, klasse dass du bei OSM mitmachst. Nur ein kleiner Hinweis, du hast dem Gebäude den Namen "Ernsting's Family" gegeben das stimmt so nicht denn das Gebäude selber hat keinen Eigennamen. Die Firma "Ernsting's Family" ist auch schon als Node im Gebäude platziert
Kovoschiz (2022-03-29 12:33:55+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-29 12:35:25+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
hauke-stieler (2022-03-29 14:17:56+00:00): Hi,

du hast hier die Radwege eingetragen, die aber auf der westlichen/linken Seite der Holstenstraße bereits als separate Wege vorhanden sind. Dadurch ist dein tagging (cycleway:right=track) hier leider falsch, da es zwei Radwege suggeriert. Ich hab hier allgemein mal das tagging gerade gezogen und die entsprechenden Stellen der Holstenstraße mit cycleway:right=separate getaggt.

Grüße
Hauke
Wolfgang Holtz (2022-03-29 14:23:16+00:00): Ich habe nach Abfrage von SC, dort markiert. Warum fragt der wenn schon eingetragen ist?
Innerhalb der Markierung sind die Radwege neben der Straße auf dem Gehweg, im südlich  gehen sie dann auf die Straße.
hauke-stieler (2022-03-29 14:41:03+00:00): > Warum fragt der wenn schon eingetragen ist? 

Leider weiß SC nicht, dass das als separater Weg eingetragen ist, da man das algorithmisch auch nicht zuverlässig ermitteln kann. Die Idee von SC ist ja auch gerade, dass man vor Ort mal nachschaut.

In diesem Fall wäre wahrscheinlich die Antwort "auf Karte separat abgebildet" die richtige gewesen. So genau kenne ich mich mit SC aber auch nicht aus, dass ich wüsste welche Antwort zu welchen tagging führt.
Wolfgang Holtz (2022-03-29 14:51:57+00:00): SC bietet kleine "Symbolische Zeichnungen" zur Auswahl an, nur wenn nichts davon zutrifft, tippt man auf "Nicht beantwortbar..." und wird dann nach einem Kommentar gefragt. Wenn man dann kommentiert, entsteht hier der Fehlerhinweis.
eggie (2022-03-29 10:52:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed, maar in OSM Nederland zijn op de gebouwen al adresnodes aanwezig. De adressen op de gebouwomtrek kunnen dus weer weg.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
J Lohuis (2022-03-29 11:07:59+00:00): Beste Eggie, 

Bedankt voor je snelle reactie. Op die gebouwen staat nog "Borgstadweg" wat momenteel "Erve Breuker" heet. Dit is een klein straatje dat tussen gebouw 3 en 4 in loopt. Geen idee hoe ik die kan toevoegen. Achter gebouw 3 wordt er nu ook nog een nieuw huis gebouwd, "Erve Breuker 5" deze staat al wel op BAG. Hoe kan die hier bij komen? Alvast bedankt.
eggie (2022-03-29 11:18:41+00:00): Dag J Loohuis.. Dat voorgaande adres heb ik al verwijderd en het nieuwe straattje ingetekend. Op de plek van nr 5 heb ik een vlak landuse construction ingetekend.
Gebouwen worden periodiek geupdated.
Haal je zelf nog even de adressen van de gebouwomtrekken af?

Je kunt ook een versneld verzoek indienen via het forum tot Bag import van nr 5. In het draadje verzoek bagimport.
Succes
Eggie
eggie (2022-03-29 11:19:45+00:00): Paar keer ctrl f5 voor het effect.. je cache leegmaken...
eggie (2022-03-29 11:26:02+00:00): Woonhuis nr 5 heb ik even toegevoegdmet adresnode  als building=construction
Dan hoef je geen verzoek in te dienen of je geduld op de proef te stellen. :)
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-29 12:20:38+00:00): Duplikaat adressen verwijderd
Kovoschiz (2022-03-29 12:37:53+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-29 12:51:20+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875635210
bxl-forever (2022-04-24 16:10:21+00:00): Hello,
Thanks but if you play with the oneway tag, please always ask yourself about whether "oneway:bicycle=no" should be added too.
Not setting it breaks cycle navigation.
Thanks in advance.
ilias_ (2025-11-30 17:40:54+00:00): I surveyed the places myself now, but please don't copy paste from Google Maps.
Warin61 (2022-03-29 23:00:06+00:00): Hi,
The aged care multipolygon relation has errors - the outer ways cannot share segments ...
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=142.18850&lat=-34.31535&zoom=18

Where a 'covered walk way' joins a building the join should have no 'barrier' ... these joining 'barriers' are creating the error.
Warin61 (2022-03-29 23:01:59+00:00): Probably better to draw a single outer way around the outside. Then draw the holes in the building with roles 'inner'.
FlexibleFront (2022-03-30 01:20:04+00:00): Thanks for raising this with me, I'll be discussing this with some of the other mappers, will be fixed soon
FlexibleFront (2022-03-30 01:44:23+00:00): I have made changes to the area to hopefully fix the issues. Please tell me what you think
Warin61 (2022-03-30 08:52:35+00:00): That works. 
Declaring the 'village' as an area is good. 

I cannot really comment on the buildings.. the passage ways between them .. I don't know, nor am I confident of the correct tagging for different ways it is done.
scintlark (2022-03-29 12:04:34+00:00): I accidentally used a wrong comment in GoMap. Should be "Change Pizza Hut to Burger King @ Heathfield".
julcnx (2022-03-30 02:41:42+00:00): Thanks for the fix. It would have been best though to rename the conflicting highway=service to highway=services, as it is normally used for gas stations in Thailand. https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=PTT%20thailand
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119063261
Andy_Tol (2022-04-27 13:14:07+00:00): Hello. I just made a relation of the service polygon and the building on it so that the road does not overlap the building.
On many maps, the tag highway takes precedence and the building was not visible under the road polygon.
The objects themselves and their tags were created before me.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119063261
Aerond (2022-03-29 11:42:13+00:00): I'm not sure this is right, Trafikverket Road Network and Lantmäteriet Topographic Map shows no connection here.
sbelemey (2022-03-29 15:59:11+00:00): hi!
thanks for your feedback. I have fixed this connection. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119076780#map=16/57.3314/15.8666

best regards, sbelemey
ilias_ (2025-11-30 17:41:17+00:00): I surveyed the places myself now, but please don't copy paste from Google Maps.
jospyck (2022-03-29 20:29:38+00:00): Hallo @toerisme Anzegem, heel erg bedankt voor je actieve bijdrage. 
Vriendelijke groeten,
Jos Pyck (Toerisme Vlaanderen)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119064572
hauke-stieler (2022-10-31 14:13:22+00:00): Hi,

nur kurz der Hinweis:
Für Fahrradstraßen reicht "bicycle=designated" nicht aus, zusätzlich muss vor allem noch "bicycle_road=yes" und ein geeigneter "vehicle=*" tag gesetzt werden. Siehe dazu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle_road. Hab hier die Straße nochmal angepasst

Grüße
Hauke
CartoKees (2024-11-15 13:56:56+00:00): Beste OttoR,
Het lijkt erop dat de parkeerplaats opnieuw is ingericht, Pampusweg 24 en 25 zijn gesloopt en er zijn twee nieuwe gebouwen geplaatst. Om de twee nieuwe gebouwen erin te zetten zou ik een deel van de parkplaats aanpassen. Maar dan klopt het geheel niet meer. Je hebt met veel detail alles getekend. Meer detail dan ik op de luchtfoto kan zien. 
Zal ik de gebouwen erin zetten en een deel van parkplaats aanpassen, maar dat zal dan met minder detail zijn als nu. Of wil je met hetzelfde detailniveau de aanpassingen doen?

Met vriendelijke groet,

CartoKees
OttoR (2024-11-17 08:30:57+00:00): Hallo CartoKees,
Ik zie op de PDOK Luchtfoto nog geen nieuwe gebwouwen. Die heb ik gebruikt om het in detail in te tekenen. Welke beeld gebruik jij?

En tsja, als het detail niet meer klopt met de werkelijkheid, zal het verwijderd moeten worden. 

Doe je de gebouwen erinzetten via een BAG import?

Met vriendelijke groet,

Otto
OttoR (2024-11-17 08:33:38+00:00): Dankjewel voor het checken trouwens!
CartoKees (2024-11-17 14:05:00+00:00): Hallo OttoR,
De BAG import was de aanleiding dat ik daar keek inderdaad. Er is een luchtfoto van 2024 beschikbaar via  PDOK. Die noemen ze Quick Ortho. Daarop zag ik dat het veranderd was.

CartoKees
OttoR (2024-11-17 14:52:28+00:00): Ah ja; de quick ortho :-) die laad niet standaard in JOSM bij mij :-)

Ik zal het een beetje opruimen; dan kan je de gebouwen importeren
OttoR (2024-11-17 16:18:49+00:00): Als het goed is kun je nu met een gerust hart de BAG update doen :-)
CartoKees (2024-11-17 19:18:45+00:00): Ja, top.
eggie (2022-03-29 12:26:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedback ... De typering komt van het Kadaster. Wanneer ke als lokale mapper denkt dat industrial beter is kan dat natuurlijk. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mavl (2022-05-20 15:49:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:34:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
wireguy (2022-03-29 22:26:29+00:00): Hiausirg,  
these relations are now broken.  Can you investigate correcting them?

relation 84623
relation 4061312
relation 4061311
relation 4060278
relation 4059438
relation 4058584
relation 85147
zluuzki (2022-03-30 16:22:18+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. I fixed them, the last one was already broken - i will delete it later.

Note that many of the deleted relations here were already broken.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:49:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.