piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Miguel Angel Jiménez García (2021-07-15 03:42:52+00:00): La via existe, las imagenes satelitales son antiguas, mapeo de sofá, verificar con imagenes satelitales más actuales, si se nota usé gpx, archivo con el que no cuento en la actualidad, trataré de reconstruir a partir de nodos, por favor no hacer mapeo de sofá.
eggie (2021-01-04 21:25:49+00:00): Dag AnenJan,
barrier=https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dcycle_barrier is als tag denk ik een vergissing?

Maak een node op het pad en tag dan 
barrier=cycle_barrier

Dit is inderdaad de wiki. Die zegt tag op een node verbonden met de weg
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dcycle_barrier

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2021-01-05 07:34:18+00:00): Leeg lijnelement met website verwijderd.
Dat is helemaal niets in osm. 
barrier=cycle_barrier toegevoegd op node.
Je moet maar eens kijken of dit de bedoeling is. 
mvg
eggie
luisforte (2021-01-04 21:16:26+00:00): Viva, criaste 5 igrejas na igreja de Lamaçães. Não fará mais sentido teres um único edificio com building=church e amenity=place_of_worship?
Luís
apires (2021-01-05 09:40:12+00:00): Olá, a edição ficou incompleta. O objetivo era criar multipart para poder atribuir outros tags nomeadamente building:levels mas faltou o outline. Fica para mais tarde; para já fica como sugeres. APires
ToniE (2021-01-04 22:43:45+00:00): Hallo Alica-map.

willkommen bei OSM.

Bei OSM gilt die allgemeine Regel: 'name is the name only".

D.h. 'name' wird nur dann gesetzt, wenn der Name tatsächlich so vor Ort zu finden ist, nicht weil 'name' beschreiben soll was dort zu sehen ist.

D.h. und weil ich in der Nähe wohne:

Das ist zwar ein Kreisverkehr (zumindest die Straße drumherum) aber die Grünfläche heißt nicht so, die hat keinen Namen.

VG
Toni
Pieter Vander Vennet (2023-11-09 14:22:29+00:00): Hey,

Is het 'scheldepeleton' (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8291604191/history)  nog actief? 

Sowieso weet ik niet ofdat een "afspraakpunt" valt onder het credo van OSM die enkel "verifieerbare zaken" verzamelt...

Mvg,
Pieter
CVNDMM (2023-11-28 16:44:58+00:00): Ja, zeker! Rijden nog elke dag...
Fraxi (2026-01-12 14:40:21+00:00): Здравей!
Имаш ли спомен откъде си взел данните за номерата на адресите в този набор от промени? На живо ли си ги виждал? Защото например за сграда https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172109773 е посочен №7, а според кадастъра е №1. Както и номерата на следващите сгради от тази, западната страна на улицата нарастват в североизточна посока от №3 нагоре.
blankmash (2026-01-12 15:49:14+00:00): Здравей, бил съм в района, но вече не знам. Повечето трябва да са от на живо с допълнения от гугъл мапс, кадфастъра и тн. Напълно е възможно да има нещо сгрешено.
Allison P (2021-01-04 23:27:47+00:00): Thanks for adding the apartment's address! However, it looks like you removed the building tag from the apartment building. I went ahead and fixed it for you.
dgitto (2021-01-20 10:17:02+00:00): Ciao, credo che l'uso di soli amenity=parking_space come qui
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892089364
non costituiscano un parcheggio in OSM. Il wiki dice che is an addition, not a replacement, to mapping a whole parking lot with amenity=parking.
fayor (2021-01-20 14:02:38+00:00): Mi sono posto anche io il dubbio e l'ho risolto mappando i singoli stalli come parking_space e l'intera area di parcheggio come parking. Ma non sempre più stalli, anche se raggruppati, fanno parte di un'area di parcheggio: ad esempio gli stalli posti lateralmente a una strada o anche quelli dell'esempio di Marina di Ragusa, sono solo stalli vicini, mentre quelli all'interno di un centro commerciale, o in aree di parcheggio propriamente dette (che di solito hanno anche un nome) fanno parte di un "amenity=parking" (da mappare con un'area, se ha limiti definiti, o con un nodo se non li ha).
dgitto (2021-01-20 16:25:11+00:00): Ok
Tantri Maya (2022-12-01 04:51:09+00:00): Hi, AthenaRossi

You did great job. Due to spiky building issue on 
https://maproulette.org/challenge/30237/task/142648461
also based on Maxar and Bing Aerial Imagery, I found that this object is not exist on imagey.
So I have to delete it.
Thanks for your understanding.
Happy Mapping!
{"_𝓑𝓻𝓪𝓿𝓮 𝓱𝓮𝓻𝓸_"} (2021-01-06 03:08:59+00:00): سلام. شما با چه مبنایی و دانشی قنات ها رو رسم میکنید؟
drzakery (2021-01-06 15:43:52+00:00): سلام. وقتی چند بار وارد قنات شوید و آنرا ببینید و چند صد ساعت تصاویر ماهواره ای آنها را رویت کنید و عاشقشان بشوید  آنوقت تشخیص قنوات کار سختی نیست.
Nakaner (2021-01-05 08:22:55+00:00): Hallo,

aufgrund des inhaltsleeren Kommentars ("Leichte Änderung") war es mir leider nicht möglich, den Sinn und Zweck dieser Änderung zu erkennen. Da du außerdem Teile des äußeren Rings eines großen Landnutzungs-Multipolygons gelöscht hast (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2187438), sodass dieses eine Lücke hatte und damit ungültig war, habe ich zur Reparatur entschieden, den gesamten Änderungssatz rückgängig zu machen. Dies half mir außerdem dabei, zweifelhafte Änderungen eines anderen Benutzers rückgängig zu machen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96833892).

Wenn du mir darlegst, welchen Sinn diese Änderung haben sollte, kann ich sie gerne in Teilen wieder herstellen.

Bitte ignoriere die Warnungen von iD beim Hochladen nicht einfach. Manche sind in der Tat Fehlalarme, es gibt dabei aber auch eine Reihe an ernstzunehmenden Warnungen, insbesondere die bzgl. Geometriefehlern. Bitte nimm dir die Zeit und beschäftige dich damit, wie Multipolygone funktionieren, damit derartige Kollateralschäden in Zukunft nicht mehr auftreten und von Dritten korrigiert werden müssen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon (es ggf. eine anspruchsvolle Lektüre, die Kenntnisse sind für fortgeschrittene Bearbeitungen aber unverzichtbar).

Ich möchte dich außerdem bitten, bei Überarbeitungen künftig nicht einfach die alten Objekte zu löschen und neu zu einzeichnen, sondern die alten Objekte zu ändern. Alle Objekte haben eine Versionsgeschichte, diese geht beim Löschen und Neueinzeichnen verloren. Du stehst dann als Ersterfasser da, der Hinweis auf diejenigen, die vor dir ihre Zeit investiert haben, geht verloren. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik

Viele Grüße

Michael
Mashin (2021-01-05 19:21:28+00:00): Hi PackmanCt,
thanks for contributing to OSM. I just noticed that you also moved Hale Junior High School to an area of highway intersection with no apparent buildings. Was this an error or is there a new development in the area?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/359264018/
owiecc (2021-01-04 22:14:36+00:00): After you draw a house you can square it by pressing "Q" in the editor.
aceman444 (2021-02-12 08:55:33+00:00): Zdravim, bod reprezentujuci stanicu Zelezna studienka uz v mape bol, takze nebolo potrebne pridavat duplicitne railway=station a public_transport=station aj na budovu stanice (ako vidite, vykresluje sa teraz stanica 2x).  Za pridanie budovy stanice dakujem.
Illio (2021-02-12 11:28:14+00:00): A ako to má byť správne?
aceman444 (2021-02-14 17:31:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation
Illio (2021-02-14 18:58:29+00:00): Ale veď ja som to označil podľa toho a vy ste to teraz zmenili.
aceman444 (2021-02-14 19:03:15+00:00): Na budove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892094184/history nema byt railway ani public_transport, kedze tie uz boli na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3350963364 .

Novsia schema je tu (aj s public_transport):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:A-simple-station.svg
BáthoryPéter (2026-03-29 20:35:23+00:00): Szia Gyula! A https://osm.org/way/892094193 nem inkább a gyalogos aluljárórendszer része?
dieterdreist (2021-01-04 22:39:29+00:00): Why did you remove the names from the sidewalks?
damianeue (2021-01-04 22:40:53+00:00): Because the sidewalks themselves don't have a specific name
dieterdreist (2021-01-04 23:00:44+00:00): thank you for the discussion on the Italian telegram channel.
SekeRob (2021-01-05 10:03:16+00:00): Bus stops have names (that of the street they are on, in pescara including the civic number the are at), it's a specific question in the Streetcomplete app and used as an identifier in a route relation. Please put it back.
damianeue (2021-01-05 10:13:06+00:00): Essendo quella fermata nello specifico un capolinea il nome della fermata è quello della destinazione dell'autobus (non mi sembra che le fermate al Terminal degli autobus di Pescara abbiano come nome Corso Vittorio Emanuele II), io il nome l'avevo messo ma è stato modificato, rimetterò quello che avevo aggiunto io.
dieterdreist (2021-01-05 10:34:30+00:00): non sono del posto, ma per le fermate (compresi i capolinea) dovrebbe essere semplice trovare il nome: c’è scritto sul palo/cartello. Invece qualora ci fossero varianti nel orario stampato/in rete, quel nome va in “ref_name”
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/ref_name
SekeRob (2021-01-06 11:06:49+00:00): On removing sidewalk names, removing other peoples contribution carefully reconsider: Quote from Wiki "A drawback of this approach is that acquiring a name of the associated street in automated way is challenging. Some mappers therefore add name or street:name tags copying the name of the street to separately mapped sidewalks. In addition there is a more complex proposal of Relation:associatedStreet that allows assigning names to sidewalks. There is no consensus on whether this is a good idea or a bad idea, and regional customs differ."
Hiking and cycling programs often rely on that information, so kindly, leave those street names on sidewalks and cycle tracks alone. And Yes, we do map information that 3rd parties can use too, that is what openstreetmap does, and not only those in italy. Ref: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
aceman444 (2022-10-09 22:15:42+00:00): Hi, why maxspeed=90 in a roundabout?
aceman444 (2022-10-09 22:20:27+00:00): The roads leading into it have maxspeed=40 except the one you changed to 90. It is true that that one branch after the city limit has no maxspeed sign.
istefanos (2022-10-13 20:27:06+00:00): Which roundabout? I thought the rule is if there is a maxspeed sign, it is valid until the next crossing. I thought, a roundabout would be interpreted as a crossing, if there is no sign, there would be the maxspeed of urban/rural/motorway.

I hope I adjusted it correctly.
bison166 (2021-01-06 16:18:11+00:00): Gerhard....wo ist das Gebäude Oelschläger geblieben ?
Gerhard42 (2021-01-07 11:16:06+00:00): Ich habe das Property Hotel zugefügt, anscheinend ist dabei das Property Building rausgefallen, habe ich wieder ergänzt.
Gerhard42 (2021-01-07 11:17:13+00:00): Es war bislang nur ein POI als Restaurant, jetzt ist das Gebäude zusätzlich als Hotel getaggt
BCNorwich (2021-01-05 10:01:19+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wondered about this bollard, seems strange to have a bollard in the middle os a residential road.

Regards Bernard.
DRose313131 (2021-01-05 11:09:29+00:00): Hi Bernard- this one’s right. It’s not a through road, it’s really only there as access for the houses along it, and it is blocked off near one end. Thanks for checking though- I am new to this and did mess up another change!
MxxCon (2021-01-05 02:08:50+00:00): Hello. Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks "It is recommended to represent the sidewalk as a separate way, if the sidewalk is not just attached with a curb but separated by a road verge or other barriers, to prevent routers from assuming free crossing". In other words, this sidewalk is attached to a road by a curb and runs parallel to it along the whole length, as such it shouldn't be mapped as a separate path, but rather tagged as a property of the road.
Nakaner (2021-01-05 12:53:51+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96936631
Nakaner (2021-01-05 12:52:01+00:00): Hallo,

bist du dir bei den beiden folgenden Wegen wirklich sicher?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3498323/history war mit tracktype=grade2 erfasst. surface=ground ist dafür untypisch.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160918915/history war mit tracktype=grade3 + surface=compacted erfasst. Du hast es auf surface auf "dirt" geändert.

Könntest du dir die Beschreibungen auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype ansehen und mit deinen Ortskenntnissen vergleichen, ob die tracktype-Angabe bei den Wegen ggf. auch geändert werden muss?

Bitte beachte, dass durch sich zersetzendes Laub gute Schotterwege im Herbst und Winter schlammig wirken können, obwohl der Dreck nur auf der Schotter-Kies-Schicht liegt. Das merkt man u.a. daran, dass zwar das Fahrrad nach der Wegenutzung wie die Sau aussieht, man aber nicht im Dreck einsinkt (hängt aber auch von den Bodenart ab ;-)).

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96936631
Nakaner (2021-01-05 12:53:44+00:00): upps, falscher Änderungssatz, obiger Kommentar gehört eigentlich zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96936588
Huhlffred (2021-01-30 19:29:12+00:00): Hallo,

entschuldige zuerst die späte Rückmeldung, habe es leider erst jetzt gesehen.
Rückblickend muss ich sagen, bin ich mir nicht mehr hundertprozentig sicher...
Ich mache bald einfach noch einen Spaziergang und schaue mir das nochmal an und melde mich dann erneut.
Aber stimmt schon... es war ein sehr schlammiger Tag als ich das eingetragen habe ... daran könnte es natürlich liegen.

Viele Grüße
Daniel
mor (2021-01-05 19:39:04+00:00): Amor de Dios no es un nombre alternativo, es la congregación de monjas que gestiona el colegio
dcapillae (2021-01-05 19:43:26+00:00): ¡Genial! Gracias, Mor. Lo corrijo ahora mismo. Se podría poner como congregación gestora del colegio (etiqueta «operator») si supiésemos el nombre exacto de la congregación. Si no, se puede incluir esa información en la etiqueta «description» hasta que tengamos más datos. Haré esto último, pero, si tienes más datos, por favor, siéntete libre de añadirlos.

Muchas gracias por la información. Seguimos en contacto.

Atentamente,

Daniel
Frans S (2021-01-05 15:15:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings. Please check this task(184) again as many buildings are not outlined according to their boundary. Please take a look and improve the building outlines. Most of the buildings here are rectangular, so you can make use of the Q-key to make their corners 90° angles. 

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96937993
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:05:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
Frans S (2021-01-05 15:11:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings. Please check this task(247) again as much buildings are not outlined according to their boundary. Please take a look and improve the building outlines. Most of the buildings here are rectangular, so you can make use of the Q-key to make their corners 90° angles. 

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96938173
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:05:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
!bm (2021-01-05 12:16:54+00:00): Hallo Gnurpsnewoel,

du hast hier von subject:wikipedia=* zu wikipedia=* verändert – das ist falsch (und zudem inkonsistent: *:wikidata=* unverändert). Bitte mal OSM-Wiki konsultieren: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Secondary_Wikipedia_links – die Statue ist nicht die Person, sondern bezieht sich auf diese!

revertiert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96978683

--besteGrüße!bm
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:05:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:05:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
akadouri (2021-02-03 05:09:28+00:00): Hello, would you be able to add crosswalks as separate ways in the future? It helps with adding curb detail later on. Working on the other side of the park now - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902880816
jmapb (2021-02-03 17:49:21+00:00): Hello fellow mapper!

I assume you're talking about the practice of drawing an entire intersection's crosswalks as a single way, like you might see in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707021297 version 3 (https://i.imgur.com/MfGECMt.jpg).

This is a very common way of mapping crosswalks worldwide, and it's the way I've generally done them when possible. It has the advantages of 1) being very fast to do well in JOSM without distorting the roads, and 2) using only a single way, which keeps the database a little trimmer.

My general ethic is to use the simplest mapping techniques possible to produce a correctly routable map. But there's always a balance between mapping simply and mapping precisely, and the standards shift over time with new mapping and routing technology, clearer imagery, and evolving use cases.

I understand that there's a lot of interest in micro-mapping sidewalks and crosswalks in order to tag information like surface, width, smoothness, sloped curbs, and tactile pavement which are of vital interest for blind pedestrians, wheelchair users, etc. The most comprehensive plan for encoding this information is the "Open Sidewalks Schema" (https://github.com/OpenSidewalks/OpenSidewalks-Schema). This has never been formally proposed and adopted into the OSM tagging standards, but that's not always how OSM works! Plenty of people are already mapping using these methods, or subsets and variations. Mappers will add them if they seem useful, and hopefully they will be.

Sorry if you find it annoying to split single-way crosswalks into multiple parts in order to add this detailed info into OSM. I can't promise I'll mend my ways (pun intended) but the good news is you won't find very many of these that I mapped, because I've generally only mapped sidewalks and crosswalks when they're necessary for correct pedestrian routing. (A good example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=40.65318%2C-73.96760%3B40.65071%2C-73.96845#map=17/40.65195/-73.96773&layers=N would give an incorrect route without the sidewalks and crosswalks.) In other cases I've mapped sidewalks as tags on the road themselves, which works well for 90% or so of NYC's street grid -- until you want to start adding detailed info to assist with accessible routing.

Some mappers like to add separate sidewalk ways to prepare for full accessibility routing, and some just on general principle. Obviously there's nothing wrong with this if it's done well! (The biggest danger in mapping sidewalks is that it can break pedestrian routing if done incorrectly, eg, leaving a dangling sidewalk end.)

I could talk about this stuff all day, so feel free to discuss this further if you'd like. I'm very happy to see more active mappers in NYC and look forward to the day when we can meet up in person.

J
akadouri (2021-02-04 00:16:46+00:00): Yeah, I was referring to that method of using a single way. I am familiar with the OpenSidewalks schema and the Taskar center that produced it (I previously lived/mapped in Seattle where they're based). Their schema is hanging the "proposed" status since 2016 and it may have deviated from this wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/sidewalk_schema. 

I don't mind if you keep mapping them that way, it's no problem to update just takes more clicks. I don't see them as incompatible but rather one having more detail than the other. It would be great to produce similar accessibility maps (https://www.accessmap.io/) though that require a lot of micromapping across the city. I'm not as familiar with sidewalk examples across the world (or even country). 

I agree with your views on simplest mapping and preserving routability. It would be great to focus on just those areas which are needed for correct pedestrian routing like your example, but unfortunately I'm not too familiar with the area yet and don't find them unless I'm already mapping sidewalks. I've been working on a quicker process using some of the open data provided by the city.

I appreciate the response as well as all your mapping efforts. Feels like every other feature I query last had your edits on it! Hope we can all meet up again soon, until then feel free to reach out if you see my edits are incorrect or would like someone to check on something in Brooklyn.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:05:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
Frans S (2021-01-05 15:07:18+00:00): Please wait with uploading to  OSM till you have more buildings mapped. At last every 10 -15 buildings will be fine.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96938860
Anton Khorev (2021-01-06 21:55:24+00:00): Hello.

Recently you along with other users were editing this road:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885527284

In a few days you made over two thousand edits, however each of these edits didn't change the road much:  
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/885527284

Can you explain the purpose of these edits?

Best regards  
Anton Khorev  
Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:05:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:06:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:06:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:06:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:05:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858