piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-11 04:08:03+00:00): Hello! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
trigpoint (2022-04-13 12:22:20+00:00): Hi, this changeset has gone badly wrong. Whilst Doodle Alley may be a dead end for vans, it is most certainly not a dead end for all modes using OSM. The fact it was joined in the first place should has set the brain cells going. The solution is clearly visible on mapillary which you have sait you were using https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2934782316802733
Generally objects in OSM are more likely mistagged rather than added in error.

Rather than deleting, you should have thought beyond your usecasespent a few minutes checking available sources and in this case converted to a cycleway.

Cheers Phil
fgupanki (2022-04-15 14:44:59+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for bringing this up. Apologies for the genuine mistake from my side and I will make sure that this will not be repeated going forward. I have modified based on latest aerial imagery. I have added cycle path based on your suggestion as a part of changeset (119754228)
Thanks again. Happy to learn from you. 
Best Regards,
fgupanki.
trigpoint (2022-04-15 14:48:08+00:00): Thank you for fixing
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
johnarupire (2022-04-11 17:46:50+00:00): Hola John, parece que en tus ediciones cambiaste la etiqueta de un centro de salud a escuela. El cambio fue revertido. ¿Conoces el lugar o sabes si ese centro efectivamente es una institución educativa y no un centro de salud?. 
Saludos.
Jhon Casas Camayo (2022-04-12 00:56:13+00:00): Buenas noches, profesor. Puse la etiqueta como escuela porque había un icono de un centro educativo al costado del edificio y no noté el otro icono. Efectivamente, aparte del icono de la escuela aparece también el de un centro de salud.
Tendré mucho más cuidado para los siguientes mapeos, profesor. 
Gracias por la observación y el cambio realizado, profesor.
johnarupire (2022-04-12 15:34:31+00:00): Gracias por la respuesta Jhon, y gracias también a @ovruni que revirtió y aviso sobre el cambio. Saludos.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
nyampire (2022-04-12 08:44:07+00:00): OSMへようこそ、変更セットをレビューしました。

細かい住所タグまで追加されていて素晴らしいです！

いくつか、修正をしました
* 建物のウェイが2重に描かれていたので、1つを削除しました
* 街区の番号が全角数字で入っていたので、半角数字に直しました
* 赤坂 百咲、のひらがな表記を、name:ja-Hiraタグとして分離しました

この調子で、引き続き編集してみてください。
Happy Mapping！
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SekeRob (2022-04-11 07:35:11+00:00): Hi,

You have 3 unresolved warning on this 3 continents touched change set! warnings:y_shaped_connection

As every good mapper does, you clean up the things you left broke.

cheers from Italy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:56:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:56:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:56:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mueschel (2022-04-15 08:22:20+00:00): Hi,
you used the new tag "monumentor" here - what does this mean? It doesn't seem to be an English word.
BubbaJuice (2022-04-15 22:44:34+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119646813. Someone asked the same question. (I'm assuming you're using some validator.)
majkaz (2022-04-11 08:51:46+00:00): That's no residential road. This is either track with dirt surface or if I am to describe it very generously a service road (driveway) to allotments. Describing it as residential road is simply wrong.
Nar_ach (2022-04-12 09:44:52+00:00): Hi majkaz, I changed the classification to service as per your suggestion.
user_125718 (2022-04-15 17:50:16+00:00): Warum mußte das unbedingt auf das unsägliche contact:*-Schema umgestellt werden? Contact, von was denn, operrator, owner,...? Das ist kein Gewinn gegenüber instagram=*, was schon 1143 Verwendungen hat.
user_5359 (2022-04-15 18:17:03+00:00): Es empfiehl sich eine Blick zum Taginfo
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=instagram 
contact:instagram ist eindeutig die häufigere Schreibweise.
user_125718 (2022-04-15 19:44:37+00:00): Außer bei intagram und facebook, liegt immer deutlich der Schlüssel ohne contact: vorne, bei phone ca. 4x, bei website 5x, bei fax 2x, und bei email auch 2x. Da hier mehrheitlich das alte Schema benutzt wird, frage ich mich, warum du hier einfach grundlos alles umgestellt hast, wo das Schema keinen Gewinn bringt, außer mehr Speicher zu kosten?
user_5359 (2022-04-16 07:19:18+00:00): Es gibt da noch eine Regel: Wenn man sich ein Schemata entschieden hat, dann halte Dich an einem Objekt auch daran.
Speicherplatz ist definitiv keine Argumentation, da wir Importe mit Fremdschlüssel akzeptieren, die wesentlich mehr Müll hinterlassen.
user_125718 (2022-04-16 17:00:32+00:00): "Es gibt da noch eine Regel: Wenn man sich ein Schemata entschieden hat, dann halte Dich an einem Objekt auch daran. "

Ja, eben, das Objekt war ohne contact: von mir erfasst worden, aber du mußtest es auf contact: umstellen, ohne das du irgendwelche Daten beizutragen hattest. Wenn du contact: für deine Eintragungen benutzen willst kannst du es ja gerne tun, aber bitte ändere nicht grundlos das Tagging anderer User, nur weil dir das Schema nicht gefällt.
user_5359 (2022-04-12 17:08:19+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir mal den Shop https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3755923613 an. Für eine bessere Beschreibung des Objekte könnte eventuell die Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:healthcare helfen!
user_5359 (2022-04-14 10:22:32+00:00): Welcoome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/6483542126. What is the meaning of the tag 08.00 = 22.00 ?
mavl (2022-04-11 13:52:51+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет ограничения движения. Это ограничение выглядит странно:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14027514  
  
Если в этом месте в конце проезда стоит знак "Движение направо", то он автоматически запрещает разворот. И добавлять на карту нужно именно ограничение "Движение только направо", а не несколько несуществующих в реальности ограничений.

Если знака "Движение направо" нет на местности, то разворот не запрещён.  
  
Вы добавляете много избыточных ограничений. Добавляйте, пожалуйста, только то, что есть в реальности.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:28:20+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9657539574/history
Frans S (2022-04-12 10:02:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Please focus on mapping of buildings. Just mapping a residential area is not enough.
Another point. You upload many times a singel building. Please map a number of buildings and upload them in 1 batch. That is more effective and reduces the number of changesets in the database.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119559537
Frans S (2022-04-12 10:03:45+00:00): Another issue. 
You map often rather square buildings as a round building. The majority here is rectangular. Please map them accordingly
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119559537
user_5359 (2022-04-12 17:13:13+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on http://www.osm.org/way/1050931170 (one of four). Did you mean place instead of palace?
mini-me (2022-04-11 10:31:05+00:00): Забываете пробелы (14 к2 литБ)
majkaz (2022-04-11 08:39:38+00:00): What is this? 
The "service road" has no connection to the reality on the ground. The whole area is private, paved, and IMHO more a yard than anything else (used for temporary storage / parking / whatever).
There are few parking places marked for customers in the south. 
I would strongly hesitate to mark anything as road there, there is no real road or driveway anywhere visible.
Moto_JB (2022-04-12 09:42:39+00:00): Thanks majkaz for the suggestion. Since it is a POI with parking lot markings towards the south side of the warehouse, I created a service highway. However, I have removed the way as per your suggestion.
majkaz (2022-04-13 11:24:01+00:00): The parking is either private or for customers only. This is definitively not a public parking.
Moto_JB (2022-04-18 13:20:33+00:00): Thank you!
eggie (2022-04-11 06:21:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster en als zodanig precies ingemeten. Kijk dus nooit naar de daken, want die zetten je op het verkeerde been. Daar staat het gebouw niet. Het zijn schuingenomen luchtfoto's.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-04-11 06:25:09+00:00): Wanneer iets niet klopt in de BAG kun je dit doorgeven middels een terugmelding aan het Kadaster via deze site...
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Vreelandseweg%2029a&resultOffset=0&objectId=1696200000290230&geometry.x=131667.864&geometry.y=473707.195&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=1696010000078333

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-11 06:29:06+00:00): reverted by changeset #119561339

Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
Mocht 29A zijn verbouwd geef dat dan door aan het Kadaster. Er wordt periodiek opnieuw geïmporteerd. 
Iets veranderen heeft meestal geen zijn. 
Overkappingen staan niet in de BAG.. Dan intekenen als buildig = roof ...  layer=1
Gr eggie

MVG
eggie
Gabriel de Oliveira Aparecido (2022-04-11 06:12:44+00:00): Nota da Prefeitura para alterações. 

Atenção: Alterações no trânsito a partir de 2ª feira (11/04)

Condutores de veículos devem ficar atentos às novas mudanças que serão implementadas no trânsito da região central da cidade a partir da próxima segunda-feira (11/04). As alterações devem-se ao avanço das obras de ampliação e melhorias no sistema de esgotamento sanitário, visando implementar o tratamento do esgoto no município de Ubá.

- O trânsito será interditado na rua Santa Cruz, a partir do entroncamento com a rua Monsenhor Paiva Campos. 

- Veículos leves que estiverem seguindo pela rua Santa Cruz com destino aos bairros Caxangá e Peluso terão a alternativa de seguir pela rua José Dias Paes ou Nicola Campanha (próximo à Praça das Mercês), passando pela região do Campo do Derminas.

- Para acessar a região Central a partir do ponto de interdição da rua Santa Cruz, veículos leves serão direcionados à virar à esquerda na rua Monsenhor Paiva Campos (que terá a mão de direção invertida), até a Avenida Raul Soares (que terá trânsito em mão dupla), passando pela Praça São Januário e rua Treze de Maio, e acessando a rua Martinho Andrade (terá mão de direção invertida) permitindo o acesso à rua Santa Cruz e o acesso à rua Coronel Júlio Soares, que permanecerá com trânsito em mão dupla. 

- O acesso à rua Monsenhor Paiva Campos, entroncamento com a rua Padre Gailhac, estará com o trânsito impedido. 

-  O acesso à rua Cônego Abreu e Silva estará com trânsito impedido. 

- Rua Dr. Ângelo Barleta continua interditada.

- Av. Comendador Jacinto Soares de Souza Lima (Beira-Rio), permanece com alguns pontos de interdição entre as pontes da rua Coronel Bernardino Carneiro e Agenor Barbosa.

Para saber mais, acesse o site da Prefeitura (www.uba.mg.gov.br)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-23 21:24:04+00:00): Não deveria ter sido retirado a tag highway destas ruas como foi feito, readicionei. O que poderia ser feito era adicionar barreiras ou adicionar access=no como foi feito.
habi (2022-04-25 08:48:51+00:00): Hallo und Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Schön macht ihr mit hier.
Ich habe letzthin gesehen, dass 'ihr' eröffnet habt und dachte, dass ich den EYEPARC noch in OSM erfassen muss.
Das habe ich mit dem Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120155249 gemacht.
habi (2022-04-25 08:51:32+00:00): Zum Defibrillator: Es macht Sinn, eine allfällige Telefonnummer im internationalen Format zu erfassen, das habe ich korrigiert, sowie den Defi ins Gebäude rein verlegt.
Die dort angegebenen Öffnungszeiten sind nicht dieselben wie die der Praxis, ist das korrekt so?
habi (2022-04-25 08:51:52+00:00): E Gruess usem nördliche Liebifäud,
Habi
EYEPARC Köniz (2022-04-26 06:36:20+00:00): Lieber Habi
Vielen Dank fürs ergänzen. Wir sind noch ganz neu in dem Tool und um jede Hilfe dankbar!
Das mit denn Öffnungszeiten ist korrekt so. Die Praxis, respektive der Defibrillator, ist länger geöffnet/erreichbar als die "normalen" Öffnungszeiten aufgrund Notfalldiensten etc. haben wir da bewusst ein wenig Spielraum gelassen.
LG, Eyeparc Köniz
Basstoelpel (2022-04-28 20:34:58+00:00): Moin Bergischer,

welche Quelle hast Du für die Adreß-tags für Kirche und Mausoleum verwendet?

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
Bergischer (2022-04-29 06:41:10+00:00): Moin, man fand es in der Liste der Baudenkmale:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Baudenkmale_in_Stadthagen#Stadthagen
datendelphin (2022-04-17 10:55:06+00:00): GWD: du meinst GWR, oder? Das Gebäude und Wohnungsregister
Maptapper (2022-04-11 08:07:24+00:00): I think some or most of the landuse tagged here as farmlands is actually meadow. 

Farmland is for crops not grazing.
Carnildo (2022-04-11 20:57:53+00:00): When you expand a node into a building like you did with Chaps Coffee Co., please make sure you copy all the information across, not just the name.
deven_smith_ (2022-04-12 07:05:24+00:00): Didn't notice the other info, thanks for reminding me
hanchao (2022-04-12 09:43:31+00:00): 你能确定这些都不存在了吗？
hanchao (2022-04-12 09:52:15+00:00): 多方数据验证至少星巴克是存在的。已回退

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119613376#map=18/31.24997/121.49335
nevw (2022-04-11 10:57:39+00:00): Hi
Was deleting Mount Eliza Lookout intentional?
It seems to have been mapped over 12years ago and is a well known lookout in Perth.
Briar93 (2022-04-12 00:08:35+00:00): Hi, 
Yes it was completely intentional as that is not where Mount Eliza Lookout is located. The lookout is actually located in the Botanic Gardens, north of the elevated glass walkway. Only the duplicate lookout near the WA State War Memorial was deleted, not the correct lookout location.
Briar93 (2022-04-12 00:15:10+00:00): If in any doubt, please consult the Botanic Gardens and Parks Authority website - they manage Kings Park and have maps of what is where, like this one: https://www.bgpa.wa.gov.au/images/pdf/kings_park/map_kp_botanic_garden_venues.pdf
nevw (2022-04-12 00:47:55+00:00): Thanks for letting us know the situation with the lookout.
Cascafico (2022-04-11 20:11:44+00:00): Per cortesia, prima di effettuare tutti le sostituzioni, discutine con la comunità.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-05-04 05:21:08+00:00): Most of these points are true and conform to the actual reality, and the local community of Saudi Arabia objects to the deletion process that took place!
Alireza917 (2022-04-11 07:20:27+00:00): در سال ۱۳۷۰که به تدریج توسعه مدارس غیرانتفاعی روبه فزونی می گذاشت فکرایجاد مجتمع آموزشی فرهنگ توسط آقای عبدالعلی فاتح راد مطرح گردید واز آنجایی که عموماً این مدارس در آن زمان در مناطق مرفه تاسیس می گردید ایشان مقید بودند که اگرمدرسه ای تشکیل می شود حتماً در منطقه ای باشد که مردم نیازمندی بیشتری به خدمت فرهنگی دارند لذا برای این کار بسیار ارزشمند مصمّم گردیدند.

برای معرفی آقای فاتح راد مدیر و مؤسس مجتمع آموزشی فرهنگ کافیست عنوان شود که ایشان از سال ۱۳۵۲ تا کنون بصورت فعّال در عرصه تعلیم وتربیت کشور حضور داشته وضمن آنکه در دو رشته علوم تربیتی و علوم اجتماعی دوره تحصیلات دانشگاهی را طی نموده است تجربه خطیری در سال های طولانی مدیریت مدارس راهنمایی نواب و فجر و دبیرستان ارشاد(خوارزمی) در منطقه ۸ و همکاری در ایجاد و اداره دبیرستان شاهد فتح منطقه ۳ ذخیره داشته اند.

با توجه به اهمیت ویژه ای که تاثیر فضای آموزشی و ساختمان مناسب در مسیر تعلیم وتربیت دارد ایشان مقید بودند تا با طراحی و ساخت فضای مناسب نسبت به تاسیس مدرسه اقدام نمایندلذا با خرید ۲۰۰۰متر زمین و ساخت ۴ هزار متر فضای آموزشی مشتمل بر کلاس های درسی هوشمند با مساحتی بالغ بر ۵۰متر مربع و آزمایشگاه های تخصصی ،کارگاه،کلینیک مشاوره،کلوپ تربیت بدنی ،باشگاه ورزشی این مدارس را دایر نمودند.و بدین ترتیب مدارس مجتمع آموزشی فرهنگ در مهرماه سال ۱۳۷۲ افتتاح گردیدو از آن زمان تا کنون با استفاده از دانش روز و دست آوردهای علمی مناسب و هوشمند به ارائه خدمت بپردازد. مدارس فرهنگ که بیست ویکمین سال کار خود را با سابقه ای موفق پشت سر می گذارد با استفاده از مناسب ترین تجهیزات و با همراهی مربیان متخصص و توانمند در زمینه های مختلف آموزشی اخلاقی ،ورزشی ،هنری واعتقادی جهت پرورش هوش های چندگانه ،تقویت خوداتکایی و پرورش عزت نفس دانش آموزان نتایج بسیار ارزشمندی را به دست آورده و اکنون نیز با کوله باری از تجربیات ذیقیمت در مقطع ابتدایی (پیش دبستان و دبستان ) و مقطع دبیرستان (دوره اول )با مدیریت های مستقل مشغول فعالیت می باشد.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-11 10:23:50+00:00): If it needs clearing, or is less obvious, it still exists.
XCountry2 (2022-04-11 10:38:58+00:00): There was literally no sign that a trail ever existed.
We were bushwhacking our way through :(