piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-24 21:22:43+00:00): Hi Kevo, I noticed your past edit to airport link roads here. I recently made a note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1702007 suggesting downgrading a whole bunch of the links that don't inescapably lead onto freeways to a lesser road class (some examples in the note). As you wrote here, several of these had and some still have foot=yes on them. Or are all the ways here currently tagged as motorway_link in fact explicitly forbidden to bicycles? If you have any thoughts on this could you comment on the note? Thanks!
Kevo (2019-04-25 02:05:01+00:00): I believe they're tagged as motorway_link because they're linking to and from motorways (409/427) - a lot used to be a single segment to/from the motorway to service roads but I chopped them up for improving routing queues.

The ramp system at TPIA is so complex that it was kept that way because many of them were connecting to or from some sort of motorway.

Correct - motorway_link shouldn't allow bike or foot.  The only way into the airport by bike or foot are the local roads like American Dr or Jetliner Rd.
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-27 15:14:16+00:00): Right but there are parts that can connect two non-motorway links, like https://osm.org/way/31122178 - in fact the entire route from T3 to Silver Dart, or the loop back from T1 to T3 https://osm.org/way/347398399. Are these technically under freeway regulations? Is this even defined in law, or a legal grey area?

Hm, I might need to dig through Mapillary/OSC or survey to double check...
Kevo (2019-04-27 19:06:58+00:00): Where the 409 ends (and it's ramp system to Airport Rd) is essentially where the roads cease to (a) be a 400 Series Highway and (b) are no longer on Provincial Land.  The TPIA side of Airport Rd is all their land I believe.  This is how MNR has it classified: https://imgur.com/Uc9iKdj - whether or not it's right in OSM context is another thing. :P
fuku_fuku (2015-08-26 11:45:32+00:00): 架空の道路や街などの編集について

こんにちは。OSMは多くの方々が実際の地形をもとに書いて、共有している地図です。
架空の道路や街などの編集はしないようお願いします。架空の地形は削除致します。　
削除する作業、元に戻すのも手間がかかりますのでこれ以上、架空の編集は自粛願います。
正直、地方の福島、いわきで編集しているOSMユーザーは少なく、通常のOSM編集であればlovetokyoshigeさん、歓迎いたします。
よろしくお願い致します。
PierZen (2016-01-18 21:17:49+00:00): Longueuil a une population de plus de 100,000 personnes et répond donc au critère place=city. Sur quel critère avez-vous modifié cette classification?
Gizmot (2016-01-18 22:22:25+00:00): Use the place=city tag to identify the largest settlement or settlements within a territory, including national, state and provincial capitals, and other major conurbations.
Smaller charter cities should normally be tagged using place=town to avoid these places being promoted too highly in gazetteer search results. By way of example, the charter city of Alameda in California (population 76,000) is tagged as a town, due to its proximity to the much larger and better known cities of San Francisco (populations 805,000) and Oakland (population 309,000).

Si vous croyez que mon interprétation est erroné, sentez-vous libre de renverser la modification
abdeldjalil (2015-08-23 12:21:51+00:00): Why delete primary road exist ????!!!!!
ratrun (2015-08-23 13:47:38+00:00): If I understood the question right you are asking why I deleted the primary road. 
The answer is because it was duplicated. 
There is one primary left (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313924829).
But the data is still a mess in this area. See the overlapping ways 313959913 and 313924829. These are the continuation of the problem in the east, which I didn't fix yesterday. Here I didn't know which one to delete, because the maxspeed tag has a slightly different values (80/60). The location around the railway crossing looks very strange.
maraf24 (2015-09-03 20:19:07+00:00): Naprawiłem.
GerdP (2015-10-27 04:49:49+00:00): please review:
way 6341890 is only tagged name=Stiens
I guess you forgot landuse=residential,
or is it a boundary?
Andre Engels (2015-10-28 02:55:54+00:00): I don't know, I just accidentily connected a point to this way and/or moved some points where the way already was connected to some highway. You might have more success with ligfietser, who removed "place=city" from this way - although that was an edit from late 2011, so he might have forgotten by now...
GerdP (2015-10-28 06:07:24+00:00): oay, thanks, I''ll try that
Hjart (2015-08-22 18:52:34+00:00): Her bruger man normalt kun en linie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree_row
Sulfo (2015-08-22 20:11:08+00:00): Rettet. Tak!
Sanniu (2017-06-18 08:56:55+00:00): Kfar Ganim or Kfar Ganim A?
Ynhockey (2017-06-23 19:36:30+00:00): I think the neighborhoods are labeled separately in Hebrew: כפר גנים א, ב, ג. Should be reflected in English, I suppose.
Sanniu (2017-06-25 14:09:51+00:00): Ok, fixed
Kakaner (2015-08-25 16:13:25+00:00): Was ist mit railway:signal:height=low gemeint?
Hjart (2015-08-22 20:22:49+00:00): Nu var det noget du selv lige havde lavet, men for at bevare historikken for et  givent objekt, er det normalt at genbruge eksisterende features. I dette tilfælde ville jeg have klippet polygonen op i hver ende og så slettet den ene halvdel.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-27 12:56:00+00:00): Hi,
Something went a bit wrong here - you managed to add something at latitude 0, longitude 0.  I deleted it: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367002196/history
UT93 (2025-01-04 16:40:39+00:00): Bist du dir wirklich sicher, dass das Gebäude, welches du in diesem Änderungssatz erstellt hast, den Namen "Kadetten" trägt?
Männedorf (2025-01-05 09:06:56+00:00): Es handelt sich um die Hütte der Jugendorganiation "Kadetten", das ist etwa so, wie wenn bei einer Pfadihütte "Pfadihütte" steht.

Falls du nicht selber vorbeigehen möchtest, schau hier: https://kadettenmeilen.clubdesk.com/kontakt
Koordinaten: 692,180/237,600
UT93 (2025-01-05 15:24:14+00:00): Ich habe deine Antwort und die darin überbrachte Adresse gesichtet. Daraus resultiert, dass "Kadettenhütte" vielleicht ein wenig passender wäre...
Männedorf (2025-01-05 22:54:02+00:00): Ich weiss nicht mehr, was ich vor 9 Jahren gedacht habe, als ich das so und nicht anders geschrieben habe. Wenn du denkst, "Kadettenhütte" sei präziser, besser oder korrekter, dann pass' es an, das ist kein Problem; ich habe das damals im Vorbeiweg kartographiert.
maraf24 (2015-08-25 23:13:15+00:00): Na budynki w budowie też jest oznaczenie: building=construction
Filip009 (2021-12-27 16:14:39+00:00): disabled:shop znamená, že je neprístupný, v rekonštrukcií, alebo zbúraný?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2892516113
aceman444 (2021-12-27 20:48:20+00:00): Ano pouzivam to, ze vlastnost docasne nefunguje, cize zrejme bol v rekonstrukcii alebo inak nepristupny. Keby bol natrvalo zruseny dam disused:shop. Nazov tam zrejme stale bol, preto 'name' som ponechal. Ale kedze to bolo pred 6 rokmi treba to samozrejme preverit, dakujem.
Filip009 (2021-12-27 21:01:36+00:00): Vďaka za objasnenie :)
SomeoneElse (2015-08-24 15:11:04+00:00): Re http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191923347/history#map=19/54.64111/-2.14026 , when a previous tag "has no meaning" it often helps if you contact the previous mapper to try and understand what they were trying to do.  Did you do so in this case?  It may be, of course, that you've tried to contact them many times in the past but they haven't replied, but just in case...
nikiforov (2017-11-11 18:21:24+00:00): класс! офигенно замаплено). много времени пришлось потратить?
chudo-judo (2017-11-12 06:22:05+00:00): Если не ошибаюсь около месяца. Это первые попытки 3д маппинга и последние)).
nikiforov (2017-11-12 08:43:23+00:00): я пооонял.) но работа интересная.
попробую как-нибудь крепость в белгороде тридэшной сделать тоже
chudo-judo (2017-11-16 05:43:02+00:00): В помощь:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings
http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=46.2003700&lon=30.3494202&zoom=17&camera.phi=-22.767
nikiforov (2017-11-17 14:26:40+00:00): Знаю, читал. Спасибо)
SomeoneElse (2015-08-24 17:43:18+00:00): Here you've changed http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1731752525/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1731752478 from "natural=locality" to "place=locality".  Obviously, "natural=locality" makes no sense, but are you really sure that that was what the original mapper was trying to map?  If you look at the most recent changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14778522 you'll see one item was changed to "natural=fell" and the other two to from "place=locality" to "natural=locality".  In a situation such as this, I'd always suggest asking the previous mapper what they actually meant.  Here it's likely that they meant to change all three to "natural=fell" but changed only the tag and not the value on two of them.  If you can't contact the previous mapper add a note - there will be people who are familiar with the area and can survey stuff, and they will be able to ensure that things are mapped properly, not just assigned to a random key.
jc67 (2015-08-29 10:27:00+00:00): starting to look at the 1st ref. you mentioned...
The very 1st text of place=locality at "http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality" is "the place=locality tag can be used to name unpopulated place...".
So as you mentioned "natural=locality" makes no sense when "place=locality" has even if less precise than "natural=fell". 
i would like also say that as far as I know "place=locality" and "natural=fell" are not incompatible even if in such case "place=locality" becomes unneeded....
so to "weigh" the change - it was from "non sense" to "unprecise" - certainly not enough but better.
jc67 (2015-08-29 10:30:05+00:00): 1 more comment - be sure that I'm going to take into account your point related to the fact of contacting the previous mapper !!
SomeoneElse (2015-08-29 12:26:16+00:00): it's "accuracy" that's important, not precision. it doesn't matter how precise a tag you use, if it doesn't match what's actually there on the ground, it's wrong. We'll see what the previous mapper / anyone who comments on an OSM note has to say...
vibrog (2016-03-01 19:22:28+00:00): Jeg har reversert din sletting av Mortensetra. Vennligst kontakt opprinnelig bidragsytre før du merger/sletter noder igjen.
patchie (2016-03-01 19:28:19+00:00): Beklager, det har jeg ikke gjort med vilje i så fall. Takk for hjelpen.
Max-- (2016-10-28 12:55:01+00:00): Hi Valentin,

is there any particular reason why you mapped the entire riverbank as barrier=hedge? There is definitely parts of the river where that is the case, i.e. meadows or field directly bordering the river, as far as I can see it from Satellite image...

Cheers,
Max
Valentin Joly (2016-10-28 14:07:37+00:00): Hi Max,
I come from this little village in Brittany. :) The river banks are indeed bordered with trees on almost all this section. You may also want to check out more detailed topographic maps and satellite images, e.g. at Géoportail (geoportail.gouv.fr).
However, I am new to OSM, so I may not have used a good representation for the river banks. If so, I am sorry and I would be pleased to correct this.
Regards,
Valentin
Hjart (2015-08-23 06:36:37+00:00): Husk at på helt lige stykker veje skal der kun bruges en node i hver ende. Se venligst punkt 1 i begynderguiden her: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3.1
mueschel (2015-09-08 17:49:35+00:00): Hi felipeedwards,
on three areas you put the tag "lans=grass". I guess that's a spelling mistake - could you correct it? I guess it's supposed to be either landcover or landuse.
Cheers, Jan
maciek-szn (2015-08-23 08:41:01+00:00): W miejscach rozchodzenia się jezdni nie twórz proszę tak kanciastych rozwidleń. Trzymanie się na sztywno, że rysujemy do osi jezdni powoduje wizualną katastrofę, a przecież jezdnie rozchodzą się płynnie i płynna również jest jazda samochodem na rozwidleniu (nie wykonuje się gwałtownych ruchów kierownicą).
d3mol3k (2015-08-23 16:49:00+00:00): OK przyjrzałem się Twoim poprawkom i wiem teraz więcej. Z innej strony - tu ulica RAtajczaka odchodzi na mapie od Witkiewicza łukiem - w rzeczywistości jest tam kąt prosty (no prawie zapewne) ;).
muralito (2015-08-23 03:59:00+00:00): Se agradece respetar la convencion vigente, en la cual las avenidas son highway=secondary.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-24 14:42:09+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3614236 ?
SomeoneElse (2015-08-23 10:27:34+00:00): Just checking - (re http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/417768) is the location for this actually correct? The house number suggests that it might not be?
kugelfiesch (2015-09-15 13:07:02+00:00): Hallo,
du hast eine Brücke und die anschließenden Wege über die A8 bei WEyarn. Als highway=unclassified eingetragen und zusätzlich einen tracktype, was nicht ganz zusammen passt. Nach meiner Ortskenntnis ist es eher ein highway=track, tracktype=grade1. Da auch die Zubringer eher Feldwege sind. Siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack#Abgrenzung_zu_anderen_Stra.C3.9Fentypen_in_Deutschland 
Ist das für dich ok, wenn ich das ändere?
Gruß kugelfiesch
TTH1980 (2015-09-15 16:53:53+00:00): Hallo,
bitte ändere wie Du meinst dass es richtig ist, nur möchte ich folgende Tatsache erkennen können: Ich bin neulich mit dem Rad dort entlang gefahren und habe feststellen müssen dass die Brücke eine asphaltierte Oberfläche hat die an Qualität einer innerörtlichen Strasse gleicht. Die Zubringer sind tatsächlich äußerst schlechte Schotter Forstwege, vor allem auf der südlichen Seite.
Viele Grüße
kugelfiesch (2015-09-15 17:07:00+00:00): Habe jetzt es jetzt zu highway=track, tracktype=grade1, surface=asphalt geändert. Ich hoffe, dass entspricht deiner Vorstellung. Ansonsten könnte man auch noch ein smoothness=good anhängen.
dsiyalov (2015-08-23 06:46:09+00:00): Здание снесено в 2015 году
chnav (2015-08-24 06:48:49+00:00): Сделал отдельный POI для фитнес-клуба
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3711483438/  

Для полноты можете указать этаж level=(число)
eternaltyro (2015-08-23 07:24:22+00:00): This is actually a fix for NH45. Comment wrong.
Gergely Ifi (2015-08-29 08:15:56+00:00): Szia, köszi hogy befejezted, pont ránéztem hogy fel kéne rajzolni a maradékot de már ott volt :)

Az én útjaimat egészítetted ki vagy újat kellett rajzolni? Nekem ez volt az első amit felraktam OSM-re, kiváncsi vagyok használható-e vagy esetleg valamit másképp kellett volna csinálni. (az út típusokban pl. nem vagyok biztos hogy jól volt megadva)

Üdv.

Ifi Gergely
veelaci (2015-08-29 13:30:26+00:00): Szia!
Csak kiegészítettem, amit rajzoltál, a saját felméréseim, fotóim, emlékeim (én csak a kilátó melletti geoládáig mentem fel) és a műholdképek alapján.
Nem volt vele gond :)
Normál esetben a jelzések nevét nem írjuk rá az útra, hanem a jelzés által érintett szakaszokat kapcsolatokba szervezzük. Ezt a piros háromszögnél meg is csináltam.
A piros U viszont nem szabványos jelzés, a térképeken nem jelenne meg. Ebben az esetben - szerintem - elfogadható, hogy a name címkét használjuk. Különösen külső, csak túrázók által járt részeken, ahol az autós/városi navigációk úgysem terveznek (ezeket esetleg zavarhatná).
Persze, ez csak az én véleményem, esetleg majd valaki nálam profibb javítja (kapcsolatba rakja), ha kell.
Üdv,
veelaci
Martin Borsje (2016-05-14 19:49:06+00:00): Hi Jaimemd,

Your comment says 'railway details' while in fact you deleted one track and simplified it by using "tracks=2". Is there any reason why you deleted tracks that other have drawn?
jaimemd (2016-05-14 20:09:23+00:00): Hi Martin,
I did not intend to delete any tracks. If I did so it must have been by mistake. Then please show me an example where a track is now missing! I also do not use tracks=2 anymore but did so in earlier times. By doing this I was trying to add the information of the number of tracks per railway line. For this purpose I late adopted the tag passenger_lines.
Martin Borsje (2016-05-14 20:15:07+00:00): Hi jaimemd,
Then it must have been a mistake...;-)

I read in the wiki: when you do not want or can draw the individual tracks, you can draw one railway line and then add tracks=n
I know the individual tracks had been drawn; but I understand by mistake merged.
The example is in the changeset and its predecessors. But no harm done! I will now split the landuse and add landuse=railway as the both tracks seem to be floating in grass....;-)
Regards
Martin
jaimemd (2016-05-15 15:21:22+00:00): I could not find any missing tracks on osm in this area. Please note that the appearance of tracks=* doesn't necessarily coincides with merging of ways because not everyone has used this tag in the way described in the wiki.
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-09-04 04:56:51+00:00): Hi TuanIfan. I changed  geometry  of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/367073964). I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou
abdeldjalil (2015-08-23 10:56:54+00:00): Sur centrale électrique de Terga veuiller supprimer tag area=yes , merci
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-26 12:14:09+00:00): I think some of these buildings are double mapped; its a bit hard to tell which is the more accurate changeset
Hjart (2015-08-24 10:55:52+00:00): Hej Jeg plejer at anbefale at man holder diverse "landuse" polygoner inklusive p-pladser adskilt fra vejnettet (highway=*), da polygoner "joined" med vejnettet alt for nemt leder til uheldige fejl på vejnettet plus gør det sværere dels at finde og dels at reparere disse. Nu betyder det ikke så meget med de her små parkeringspladser, men syntes lige jeg ville nævne det
Hjart (2015-08-24 10:59:52+00:00): Jeg er godt kendt med det her område og kender også de her butikker godt, men mit fokus (i osm regi) er bare et lidt andet end dit :-)
Hjart (2015-08-24 11:08:43+00:00): Vær også opmærksom på at adskillelsen mellem timer og minutter i opening_hours skal være med kolon ':' og ikke punktum '.'.
Hvis det kan være en hjælp for dig vil jeg lige gøre opmærksom på at JOSM's validator er god til at fange den slags fejl.
arcanma (2015-08-23 17:54:40+00:00): Il fabbricato il cui spigolo è stato inserito nella relazione del castello di Carnaiola sarebbe il casale della descrizione del gruppo di modifiche? In tal caso sarebbe opportuno usare il tag description sul building, non è corretto inserire un nodo del building nella relazione del castello
luschi (2015-09-01 21:17:20+00:00): di nuovo google translate?
spietsnaz (2015-09-02 07:26:36+00:00): No, https://www.sentres.com/it/sci-alpinismo/kaelberberg-monte-dei-vitelli
Come vedi NON invento niente. 
In Alto Adige è in vigore anche l'Italiano, non solo il tedesco. Se poi la provincia autonoma, volutamente, nelle sue carte GIS mette solo l'indicazione in Tedesco, non è un problema mio. Le fonti le cito, non uso Google translator o il Tolomei translator.
luschi (2015-09-02 08:10:49+00:00): si deve quardare se usa solo sentres questo nome o si usa da per tutto.
Anche di qui chiedo se possiamo usare i dati di sentres su OSM? link: https://www.sentres.com/it/impressum
arcanma (2015-08-23 17:55:39+00:00): Dalla foto satellitare la forma non è circolare
luschi (2015-09-01 20:59:00+00:00): da dove hai preso questo nome italiano? google translate?
spietsnaz (2015-09-02 07:30:04+00:00): No: http://www.suedtirolerland.it/it/sport-e-tempo-libero/montagne-ed-escursioni/escursioni-in-valle-isarco-ed-in-alta-valle-isarco/escursione-da-varna-a-scaleres-e-spelonca/
Le fonti le cito. Non uso Google translator,
Ti ricordo che in Alto Adige vige anche l'uso ufficiale della lingua italiana (prego leggere lo Statuto di autonomia),
Vediamo in non offendere perché non metto le indicazioni solo in Tedesco.
luschi (2015-09-02 08:06:06+00:00): Si usa anche la lingua italiana, ma non esiste per tutti sentieri, strade, case, posti un nome italiano.
Una altra domanda. Possiamo usare i dati di suedtirolerland.it su OSM? link: http://policies.peer.biz/it/copyright/
eggie (2018-04-20 12:55:03+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen.. daarom.. Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Jose Riha (2015-08-23 21:40:04+00:00): ahoj, prosim supisne pridaj aj do addr:conscriptionnumber podla wiki.freemap.sk/cislabudov. dakujem. jose
luschi (2015-09-01 20:49:35+00:00): in Südtirol si usa un "-" per separare Tedesco e Italiano. Non usiamo un "/"
Esempio qui:
corretto "St.-Elisabeth-Weg - Vicolo Santa Elisabetta"
sbagliato "St.-Elisabeth-Weg / Vicolo Santa Elisabetta"
E alla fine. Se cambi nome di un pezzo di strada, fallo prego con tutta la strada con questo nome.
spietsnaz (2015-09-02 07:32:27+00:00): Ok, ti dò ragione. Seguirò la consuetudine usata in Alto Adige.
Una curiosità: come faccio allora quanto, in Tedesco, il nome già contiene "-"? Come fa un lettore a distinguere la voce da quella italiana? Grazie.
luschi (2015-09-02 07:57:13+00:00): Un lettore di navigatore(uso OsmAnd) legge sempre tutto quello che è scritto in name=...
Ma possono esistere anche altri che prendono name:it o name:de. Per quello esiste questo tag.
È sempre com'è programmato un lettore o navigatore
aaronsta (2015-09-13 10:42:05+00:00): Changeset partially reverted. Incorrect road classification. Check classification before edit.
luschi (2015-09-01 20:19:21+00:00): Stai attento con i tuoi modificazioni di name:it e name:.. 
Come qui il nome è Vinzentinum e è uguale in tedesco e italiano e così non serve fare un extra name:it Collegio Vinzentino(anche scritto sbagliato). anche il nome delle fermate non si cambia.
spietsnaz (2015-09-02 09:51:31+00:00): Mio miss-type. Era Vicentino.
Nella mappa http://www.alto-adige.com/assets/stadtplan-brixen.pdf che come vedi è redatta prima in tedesco e poi in italiano si legge distintamente "Collegio Vicentino". Visto che il file si chiama "Stadtplan" non credo sia stato redatto da un fan di Tolomei.
luschi (2015-09-02 11:19:03+00:00): perché prendi una mappa di 2009 per trovare un nome italiano di un posto che non ha uno italiano?
Wikipedia e il sito ufficiale Vinzentinum non ha un nome diverso per questa scuola, perché non esiste!
dafadllyn (2021-04-05 19:35:38+00:00): Hallo! Ich habe die von dir eingezeichneten Wege mit den Namen "Schnaps-Allee" und "Bier-Gasse" gelöscht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102354517). Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass es sich dabei um einen Jux handelte.
pacman541 (2015-12-01 10:36:48+00:00): Снимок бинга в этом месте сдвинут, двигайте под мапбокс
aceman444 (2020-02-16 00:42:53+00:00): Zdravim, prosim nepridavajte vymyslene znacky (tu transportation=bus_stop), ked uz existuju zauzivane znacky k prislusnemu typu objektu (tu highway=bus_stop).
yasunari (2015-08-23 14:54:15+00:00): 岩上の案内板はこっちでしたよね。
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3710594786#map=19/35.05998/135.75286
sanak (2015-08-23 17:12:44+00:00): はい、写真[1]の位置から、そのまま使用しておりましたが、別の方向から撮った写真[2]との位置関係を考えると、上記の方が正しいようです。私の方のを、削除するようにします。
[1] https://www.dropbox.com/s/tpirg238qsbmsv9/Ganjyo1.png?dl=0
[2] https://www.dropbox.com/s/bsj3qbxq8ourydy/Ganjyo2.png?dl=0
sanak (2015-08-24 12:03:48+00:00): 遅くなりました。今しがた、削除しました。
yasunari (2015-08-24 14:33:13+00:00): スマートフォンのGPSって所詮その程度の精度で、サーベイの最初にもお話しましたが、写真だけではそれがどこだったかを見失ってしまいます。
地図にメモ、紙と鉛筆、最強です！

これに懲りず、取材されたものは全部マッピングをお願いします！！
sanak (2015-08-25 09:42:44+00:00): はい、今後気をつけるようにいたします！
dvdzero (2015-08-24 23:56:16+00:00): perchè route=bicycle? è un errore?
esistono già le relazioni per la ferrovia verona-bolzano (entrambe le direzioni)
tyr_asd (2015-08-30 07:49:35+00:00): Very likely. I've fixed the obvious mistakes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33677317
David Crochet (2015-08-24 06:49:16+00:00): Je pense que amenity=sanitary_dump_station est mieux :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsanitary_dump_station
yasunari (2015-08-26 12:42:01+00:00): 消火器は fire_hydrant （消火栓）ではなくて、fire_extinguisher です。
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Map_Features#.E6.B6.88.E9.98.B2

JOSM のプリセットには無いので、いつも
JA:Map_Features からコピペしてます。
taki3hira (2015-08-26 14:09:26+00:00): ご指摘ありがとうございます！
プリセットに頼り切っているのはダメですね。
早速修正しました。
yasunari (2015-08-26 14:14:53+00:00): fire_hydrant:position がいらなくなくなるという罠も待ってます（最初からそれも書いとけよ _o_
taki3hira (2015-08-26 14:29:28+00:00): いろんな罠～対応済！
yasunari (2015-08-26 14:33:03+00:00): Good Job!
Hjart (2015-08-23 23:06:21+00:00): Du glemte vist et enkelt 's' her.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-08-24 07:51:59+00:00): ja, tak
trial (2019-10-29 12:55:38+00:00): merci de ne pas confondre hangar agricole et hangar aéronautique (oui iD est trompeur)