piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Arvīds Gills (2022-08-21 15:24:42+00:00): Hey! The data is from the Ministry of Environmental protection and Regional development of the Republic of Latvia so I'd like to think the data is quite accurate. While adding the points I did sanity check all the points using Orthophoto, every point was put there by hand, no automation. I feel like the data gived made sense for most locations, but, if course, it's possible that there are errors or misleading datapoints. If there is doubt about real life not matching points in this changeset, I think it should be encouraged to modify or delete point locations to improve OSM.
HellMap (2022-08-21 15:40:30+00:00): I'll check it next time I'm there. Although I have a feeling it is not. There is nothing there on Mapillary photos and I would have likely noticed it. But it could be nearby or hidden, or dismantled, or newly-installed.

Also, coincidentally, I added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9962096749/history just before you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9962237086/history . I assumed it was a well pump because it has a literal handle for pumping. But your data seems to be for water mains taps. So I guess it's actually a fake handle that simply opens the tap...

In any case, you can see the accuracy here is some 20+ meters wrong. Obviously, much better than nothing, but there are likely more errors. Latvian municipality data is really spotty for such details in my experience.
HellMap (2022-09-02 19:18:15+00:00): Hi again. Just to let you know I deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9962237084 at 57.0116037, 24.1461039 in Mežaparks. After surveying, there is nothing here except some paths and forest. If there is a tap somewhere else in Mežaparks, it's not here. So this coordinate must be approximate or wrong. Were there other coordinates for Mežaparks in the data?
HellMap (2022-09-10 17:21:29+00:00): Hey again! I added a fixme tag to most of the taps in [1]. I looked through a lot of them, compared to aerial and Mapillary and existing taps. My conclusion is that the municipality data is in some cases very approximate. The general area for them seems to be mostly accurate (like, none are in the middle of nowhere), but the exact locations (especially for older ones) are only accurate to an address or street, which in some cases (like Mežaparks above) means it's completely wrong. Hopefully, these can be surveyed and verified over time.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126023696
user_2066394 (2022-08-19 15:47:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/998113132
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778765143
überschneiden sich aktuell.
ALu68 (2022-08-20 05:57:16+00:00): Danke. Sehr aufmerksam.
silversurfer83 (2022-08-18 20:41:14+00:00): Hi Basti
Wenn Geschäfte schließen, umgebaut werden,... sich andere Dinge ändern muss nicht direkt gelöscht werden. Es gibt für diese Fälle eine schöne Sammlung an Hilfsmitteln, die sogenannten Lifecycle Prefixes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Dann sieht man, dass dort etwas leersteht. Ggf lässt sich mit dem alten Namen noch navigieren, weil jmd mit alter Ortskenntnis danach sucht (wäre dann was:name=NAME). Besonders wenn die Schilder noch an der Fassade hängen.
Wäre cool, wenn du dies in Zukunft bei zutreffendem Fall nutzen würdest.
Danke

-silversurfer83
gpsbasti (2022-08-19 07:06:50+00:00): danke für den Hinweis, hab's korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125091521
Ropino (2022-08-21 11:43:44+00:00): Hi,
was meinst du mit:
"highway=continue" ?
sieht für mich wie "service" oder "track" aus...
VG
Drahtochse (2022-08-21 16:20:57+00:00): Hi Ropino,
Das war wohl ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler. Habe es auf Track geändert, das scheint mir am passendsten.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125190222

Gruß Drahtochse
Ropino (2022-08-21 16:48:04+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung und Änderung.
marczoutendijk (2022-08-18 18:34:32+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124560102, 124560189, 124560368, 124560473, 124560819, 124560940, 124561085, 124561330, 124561878.
Leo Slager (2022-08-19 17:04:28+00:00): Hi Martin,
In deze changeset zitten zoveel self-intersecting ways dat ik niet weet hoe ik dat moet gaan herstellen.
Ik zou willen adviseren dat je deze changeset gaat reverten.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.69316&lat=50.86854&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
Martin Borsje (2022-08-19 17:06:07+00:00): Ik zal eens kijken wat hier fout gegaan is....ik dacht dat alleen "non-names" verwijderd had nav forum discussie....
Martin Borsje (2022-08-19 17:13:05+00:00): Heb gerevert, met wat conflicts....zal e.e.a. nagaan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
kubahahaha (2022-09-26 21:32:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8631547909

To jest w końcu inpost czy allegro?
Sandal man (2024-01-01 11:23:17+00:00): Hola, ¿sabes si este camino ya está en uso?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078452007
Saludos Jan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-04 19:09:36+00:00): porque você havia apagado estas tres vias? tive que reverter isto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725633801, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725463704, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725575431
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-04 19:09:46+00:00): ¿Por qué borraste estas tres formas? tuvo que revertir esto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725633801, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725463704, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725575431
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-22 00:41:35+00:00): Edición revertida, aunque no está permitido, las calles siguen existiendo en la zona "prohibida", por lo que deben estar en el mapa ;) Desde el momento en que son demolidas, si lo están, entonces puedes borrarlas.
AndersAndersson (2022-08-18 21:09:07+00:00): Hej! Tack för denna import!
Jag såg att enhet saknades för effekten (generator:output:electricity).
Går det att få in?
Tomas Marklund (2022-08-18 21:33:21+00:00): Hej!

Äsch, attans också :-(
Jo, det går såklart, ska klura på hur jag ordnar det på enklaste sätt. Och framför allt, inte ladda upp några fler enhetslösa kraftverk. Tack för påminnelsen, jag återkommer!
AndersAndersson (2022-08-18 21:35:17+00:00): Jag ser dock fram emot fortsättningen med fler verk. Så lycka till!
Tomas Marklund (2022-08-18 21:47:16+00:00): Det gick ganska enkelt. Fixat med changeset 125081919

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125081919
AndersAndersson (2022-08-19 05:05:12+00:00): Snyggt!
◪ Jarv (2022-08-19 22:20:44+00:00): I'm not sure that there is a no right turn restriction here. Coming from western road there is a no left turn, but as Queens square is on its own phase, there would be no reason to ban a right turn
Jez Nicholson (2022-08-21 10:57:32+00:00): Good spot Thomas. I've removed the no-right-turn as this will mess up taxi routing from the rank in Queen Square. Perhaps the mapper meant to add a Queen's Rd->North Road no right turn?
Evan_Cho (2022-09-01 21:36:30+00:00): Hello, I am sorry for the delay in the response, thanks for checking in on this edit, when looking at the roads I got Queen Square and Queen Road mixed up which caused this mistake. From what I see there is no restriction there. The restriction that I saw was a no right turn from Queen Road to North Street. Here is the mapillary image that I saw the no right turn from Queen Road to North Street. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.82400565&lng=-0.14338753&z=17&trafficSign%5B%5D=all&focus=photo&pKey=315077983348796&x=0.49100639937649376&y=0.4415148740159775&zoom=0 . As far as I can see this is the correct no right turn that was meant to be added, but it already exists on the correct segments. I apologize for this poor edit and will make sure in the future I will be more careful. Thanks again for looking into this.
◪ Jarv (2022-09-02 21:42:49+00:00): No worries, easy mistake to make.
Strubbl (2022-08-19 12:58:41+00:00): Danke, klasse gemacht. Sehr cool, wie viele neue Adressen hinzugekommen sind. 👍
◪ Jarv (2022-08-19 22:18:51+00:00): I don't believe that this restriction is correct.

There is no signage on approach or on the signs saying no right turn or a mandatory left turn.

There is a no right turns sign on the exit of the junction facing North, which is really badly placed as it actually refers to no right turn onto Kings Road, although cycles are able to.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
mueschel (2022-08-19 08:15:55+00:00): Hi,
I found these keys on many objects:
name:zh-hans
name:zh-hant

The correct spelling is
name:zh-Hans
name:zh-Hant
(scripts always start with a capital letter). Could you check and correct this?
HolloWorld (2022-08-19 11:04:12+00:00): hi, this is a manual editing using josm searching system. I will change it to zh-Hant/Hant asap. thanks.
mueschel (2022-08-19 14:40:13+00:00): I used 'script' as in 'writing system' or 'alphabet'. Not with the meaning of an automated edit in OSM.

Sorry for the confusion about that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Script_(Unicode)
user_12500175 (2022-08-19 21:27:27+00:00): Hallo, 
du hast bei einigen Geschäften die anscheinend nicht mehr existieren die Nodes gelöscht. Besser wäre es wenn du die Nodes nicht löscht sondern ein "disused:" davorsetzt. So sieht dann jeder dass das Geschäft geschlossen wurde und trägt es eventuell nicht mehr neu ein.

Gruß
Danfost
olo81 (2022-08-26 16:06:31+00:00): Skąd taka nazwa?
Alexander Bisset (2022-08-18 20:39:44+00:00): Geo referenced drone photo from 5th August 2022 can be supplied by email to verify layout and correct angles and thickness of quays to ensure my edit is changed to be accurately reflecting reality.
DUGA (2025-02-12 04:41:13+00:00): You probably need to disable smart punctuation.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199308579/history#map=19/44.376922/-72.122034
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-08 21:27:01+00:00): Chyba przez przypadek dodałeś peron na trawie 😋. Uwaga powstała na ten temat.
Adam Klocusky (2022-09-09 21:11:47+00:00): Tak, już poprawiłem :)
ivanbranco (2022-11-11 10:26:53+00:00): Ciao meinmap, 

sei sicuro di questa posizione? Un utente l'aveva già mappata piu' ad est un anno fa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8859692766

o ce ne sono due?
meinmap (2022-11-11 10:48:04+00:00): Ciao Ivan, grazie per la segnalazione, in effetti sono andato a verificare le coordinate che avevo salvato e l'avevo inserita nel punto sbagliato, tra l'altro non accorgendomi che era già stata inserita più accuratamente da un altro utente.

Ho appena provveduto ad eliminarla, grazie.
ivanbranco (2022-11-11 11:00:05+00:00): Grazie a te, buon mapping!
megaloman-it (2025-03-06 22:24:47+00:00): Ciao @Robot8A, mi permetto di chiederti se sei sicuro che questo ristorante (Antico Ristoro di Cambi) effettivamente offra cucina halal: non ho trovato riferimenti sul loro sito ma ammetto di non essere esperto in materia.
Grazie dell'attenzione, ciao!
Robot8A (2025-03-24 20:13:53+00:00): Ciao, ricordo che siamo andati al ristorante con un gruppo che includeva alcuni musulmani, e credo che abbiamo chiesto. Ma forse le informazioni non sono più aggiornate, e sono passati più di due anni, quindi potrei non ricordare bene.
megaloman-it (2025-03-25 21:46:09+00:00): Ciao, nel weekend ero a Firenze e ho potuto chiedere di persona all'oste, che ha confermato che servono carne halal.
Grazie per la tua risposta!
MapTheWalk (2022-08-20 09:32:33+00:00): Hello Bella, I have identified a few issues with this changeset:
1. All the ways added have a certain offset, resulting in a misalignment with respect to the existing mapped roads.
2. The ways have been added in places where existing ways were already mapped, resulting in redundancy.
3. The ways are not linked to any other ways on the map. This will create problems for routing engines including CityMapper's.
4. Both changesets #125081673 and #125080903 overlap, resulting in duplicate imported ways.

Suggest reverting this and any changesets with similar issues. 
Instead, please modify the geometry of the existing ways in accordance to LTA dataset, and add the applicable tags, making sure that alignment connectivity are correct.

Lastly, kindly indicate your affiliated organization and project for others' reference.

Cheers!
bella_citymapper (2022-08-21 16:04:32+00:00): Hi MapTheWalk!

I'm sorry I'm aware of those errors and did already revert the changes via http://revert.osmz.ru/ and JOSM. Does it take time for the changes to be reflected? Would appreciate any guidance in checking if the reverts actually happened!
bella_citymapper (2022-08-21 16:08:10+00:00): Hi again,

I know why it the change wasn't reflected; the file is too big (http://revert.osmz.ru/7016) I'll update you again once I've reverted it successfully.
bella_citymapper (2022-08-21 16:13:19+00:00): Hi MapTheWalk,

I've (hopefully) reverted the changeset fully via JOSM here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125189945).
bella_citymapper (2022-08-21 16:18:05+00:00): I've also reverted another related changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125190059#map=12/1.3652/103.8424)
MapTheWalk (2022-08-22 14:55:55+00:00): Looks like you managed to fix it. Thanks for taking prompt action. Looking forward to see this project take off.
bella_citymapper (2022-08-22 15:37:26+00:00): Thanks for alerting me to it! I was doing some tests and thought I reverted the changes 😅--I'll be sure to follow your recommendations as I slowly add in the data.
somix (2022-08-19 06:03:36+00:00): Hello, why do you delete grass (e.g. 56.94832, 24.01773) and change highway=living_street to living_street=yes (56.96073, 24.01048)?
Beton Krai (2022-08-19 09:56:59+00:00): Hello, grass areas in between entrances at 56.95915,24.00793 (with IDs 1016901576 1016901577 1016901578 1016901575 1016901574 1016901573 1016901572) were deleted. Three grass patches at 56.96371,24.02126 (with IDs 1009097300 1009097996 1009097995) were deleted. Two grass multipolygons were deleted at 56.95788,24.01074 (with IDs 13541386 13541387). Also grass at 56.94832, 24.01773 apartment courtyard was mapped in a lot more detail than the one to the left of it. 
Can you please explain the reason for these deletions of detail?
arcth (2022-08-19 22:39:03+00:00): A lawn or any grass patch inside landuse=residential or landuse=retail isn't landuse=grass. Generally landuse should not overlap [1].

There was an attempt to introduce the landcover tagging scheme [2] to map the actual surface, but it does not appear widely used.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landcover
arcth (2022-08-19 22:42:25+00:00): These highways in Imanta are service ways for apartment blocks rather than actual living streets.

Highways are mapped according to their function, not legal status [1]. While the sign 533 [2] imposes certain traffic rules, it does not change what these ways are used for. There is living_zone=yes tag [3] to map highways affected by the sign 533.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Usage

[2] https://likumi.lv/ta/id/274865-celu-satiksmes-noteikumi

[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:living_street
Beton Krai (2022-08-20 11:04:55+00:00): From the wiki you linked - "landuse=grass does not always describe a land use, it often describes a landcover." [1]

Doing a quick overpass turbo query shows that the landcover= tag has been used for a total of 7 times in whole of Latvia.
Not to mention that in the rest of the world, landuse=grass is 145 times more popular than the landcover alternative.

It just seems disrespectful and random to delete widely accepted landuse=grass areas, and not even replace them with anything else.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use#Challenges_mapping_land_use
somix (2022-08-21 06:57:20+00:00): highway=living_street is used for any street marked with sign 533. And living_street=yes is a failed proposal used only in 4 countries according to local agreements.
HellMap (2022-08-21 14:38:45+00:00): By the way, tagging roads in a living zone (533) as highway=living_street is described in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines as local consensus
arcth (2022-08-22 01:57:58+00:00): Mapping lawns as landuse makes a pretty picture with the default rendering style but somewhat poor quality map data. It may appear quite hard to distinguish between landuse=grass that is actual landuse, landuse=grass on top of other landuse that is just a lawn and landuse=grass that intersects other landuse by error.
arcth (2022-08-22 02:33:02+00:00): It still doesn't look right according to the 'function rather than legal status' principle. Using highway=living_street on every way affected by the sign 533 would reduce the detail e.g. no service=driveway or service=parking_aisle.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Muhmaker (2022-08-19 11:12:50+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM. Ich bin auf deine Änderungen hier aufmerksam geworden und habe einen Hinweis für dich. Wenn Gebäude abgerissen werden, ist besser sie mit einem sogenannten Lifecycle-Prefix zu versehen anstatt sie ganz zu löschen. Dadurch kann ausgedrückt werden, dass dort ein Gebäude stand aber nun abgerissen ist. Hier wird das etwas ausführlicher erklärt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix  Wenn dann ein ortsfremder Mapper in einem (veralteten) Luftbild ein vermeintlich fehlendes Gebäude entdeckt und neu eintragen will, zeigt diese Prefix an dass dort kein Gebäude mehr ist. Hier kannst du es jetzt so lassen, da in den nächsten Wochen vorraussichtlich neue Luftbilder erscheinen, in denen die Baustelle auch sichtbar ist. Außerdem ist die Baustelle ja auch markiert.
ivanbranco (2022-08-23 20:58:10+00:00): Ciao nick, 

il ref:msal che hai aggiunto a questa farmacia è già utilizzato in quest'altra: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4470290890

L'open data del Ministero della Salute indica infatti "BALDICHIERI D'ASTI" come comune.
mweper (2022-08-19 23:40:27+00:00): Hola y gracias por colaborar en OSM.
Por favor, explica que es lo que quisiste añadir aquí ya que según imágenes a nivel de calle y satelitales, no pareciera que haya una ducha pública en esa ubicación.
-
Véase https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity=shower
Arnaud Champollion (2022-10-30 19:26:39+00:00): Bonjour,
La dernière fois que je suis passé le chemin 93302560, qui existait jadis, n'était plus utilisable car privatisé.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93302560
Je suis étonné de le voir figurer à nouveau, l'avez-vous emprunté sans problème récemment ?