piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:19:18+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_870861 (2016-08-04 21:30:48+00:00): 2 man_made embankment exactly duplicated (tags and geom) from the same changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35154510
user_870861 (2016-08-04 21:32:23+00:00): 2 swimming pool exactly duplicated (tags and geom) from the same changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39897259
user_870861 (2016-08-04 21:33:02+00:00): 2 stream exactly duplicated (tags and geom) from the same changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39897259
user_870861 (2016-08-04 21:34:00+00:00): 2 tracksl exactly duplicated (tags and geom) from the same changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40849516
user_870861 (2016-08-04 21:34:27+00:00): 2 tracksl exactly duplicated (tags and geom) from the same changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40849516
user_870861 (2016-08-04 21:35:05+00:00): 2 tracksl exactly duplicated (tags and geom) from the same changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40849516
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:19:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
chnav (2016-08-07 07:51:50+00:00): Вы грохнули границу Шымкента и нескольких районов. Главное правило ОСМ - НИЧЕГО НЕ УДАЛЯЙТЕ если не знаете для чего это используется и тем более нарисовано не вами. Это жесть сколько теперь прийдется разбираться.
chnav (2016-08-07 08:00:31+00:00): Полюбуйтесь на дырку в границе https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5551117
chnav (2016-08-07 12:35:53+00:00): Проверил все ваши правки, всё исправил, восстановил что удалено по ошибке. Пожалуйста впредь будьте аккуратнее.
user_870861 (2016-08-07 19:00:43+00:00): bonjour,
il y a plus de 100 ways duplqués dans certains de vos changesets. Majoritairement 41012893, 41229636, 40736588 et 41215506 (cours d'eau, chemin et batiments)
jinalfoflia (2016-08-04 06:40:34+00:00): The changes I have made is not in accordance to my changeset comment. I have separated the connected roads based on the imagery. ( https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/13270#ticket)
chnav (2016-08-07 12:21:38+00:00): Этот проезд https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435414593/history виден на спутнике. Восстановил.
Vintagejhan (2016-08-05 02:59:14+00:00): 那公園好了嗎? 太久沒過去再麻煩幫忙更新一下啦~
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:18:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
dbf_ (2016-08-04 09:09:20+00:00): Пожалуйста, не используйте исключительно буквы верхнего регистра в названиях объектов.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:18:36+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
DD1GJ (2016-08-04 09:00:04+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM und danke für die ausführlichen Informationen. Leider legst du doppelte Objekte an, denn Tankstelle und Restaurant waren bereits vorhanden. Ich habe es korrigiert
DD1GJ (2016-08-04 09:07:24+00:00): Achte bitte auch auf die korrekte Syntax der Öffnungszeiten: Mo-Fr 06:00-21:00; Sa,Su 08:00-21:00

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
Algebre gama (2016-08-04 10:13:51+00:00): use "arcgis osm editor" instead , this is the most suitable for this type of edition.
Hjart (2016-08-04 09:40:45+00:00): "Jylland" er et ret stort område. Jeg vil sætte pris på en mere specifik angivelse. I dette tilfælde f.eks. "Fovslet skov"
Lytter1 (2016-08-04 18:10:05+00:00): Jeg er klar over det, men er det ikke muligt at kunne ændre det, når man har lavet fejlen?
Hjart (2016-08-04 18:26:33+00:00): Nej, det er desværre ikke muligt at rette det når du først har lukket et ændringssæt. Det gør heller ikke noget med nogen "smuttere", men at have det som en generel regel vil være fint.
ff5722 (2016-12-12 09:26:11+00:00): "Наша Хата"

Is this the name of a real business or is it literally your house?
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:18:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Alecs01 (2016-08-04 19:22:19+00:00): Ciao Gianmarco e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! un tribunale in un campeggio sembra abbastanza strano http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcourthouse cosa intendevi mappare?
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:18:17+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Tom Layo (2018-10-17 05:17:01+00:00): Way 435608656 should be split and added to east-west way. Also, the number of nodes should only be two for a straight road.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-24 11:13:12+00:00): Hi, Super-Map. I changed the classification of the roads (way 435610282, way 435610415, way 435610276) to be unclassified highway. Please tell me if I'm wrong
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-25 07:48:30+00:00): Hi, Super-Map. I changed the classification of the roads (way 435610407, way 435609543,  way 435609632,  way 435610302) to be residential highway. Please tell me if I'm wrong
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:18:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
surveyor54 (2016-09-02 08:25:16+00:00): Man sollte hier unterscheiden ob es sich um einen Campingplatz handelt, oder um einen reinen Wohnmobilstellplatz. Denn auf einem  Campingplatz können Wohnmobile, Wohnwagen und Zelte stehen und sollte dann nur als camp_site getaggt werden. Entweder caravan_site oder camp_site sollte wieder gelöscht werden. Beides zu mappen ergibt keinen Sinn.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site

Gruß
surveyor54
corfede (2016-08-04 15:28:15+00:00): Gli edifici sono stati importati dalla Carta Tecnica Regionale di Puglia. Purtroppo spostarli in base a quanto visibile nelle foto Bing messe a disposizione con l'editor in-browser iD, non significa migliorarle ma peggiorarle. Usando l'editor JOSM e le ortofoto del Portale Cartografico Nazionale Italiano del 2006 e del 2012, si può verificare che le sagome sono già corrette. Procedo ad annullare le modifiche e resto comunque a disposizione per altre informazioni.
mapper999 (2016-08-10 17:53:23+00:00): Hi,
falls das Gebiet wirklich ein Industriegebiet ist, würde ich den Wert landuse=* ändern und nicht einfach ein landuse_1=* hinzufügen. Ich denke aber eher, dass es sich hier um ein Gewerbegebiet (landuse=commercial) handelt, falls es wirklich kein Einzelhandelsgebiet ist. Die Rendererunterstützung sollte übrigens nicht ausschlaggebend für das Ändern von Tags sein.
Ich habe den landuse_1 key gelöscht, bitte gegebenenfalls den landuse=* key ändern.
Hjart (2016-08-04 10:14:27+00:00): Hej og velkommen til vores projekt.
Jeg har lukket hullet du har lavet her og i stedet anbragt en "cykelsluse", så routere stadig kan lede fodgængere og cyklister igennem.
IduRSoB (2016-08-04 11:21:23+00:00): Hej ok super! bare den lukker for biler :-)
Supaplex (2016-08-10 10:51:20+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-08-21 13:31:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice for a good address information we need the addr:street and addr:housenumber Tag. For better description of your business, please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft .
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:17:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
zstadler (2016-09-04 19:08:25+00:00): Hello mapeditor999,

I believe the removal of the construction tags was premature. 
According to the wiki

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#start_date_and_opening_date

the construction tag needs to be used until the opening of the railway to the public.

As you wrote, this has not happened yet.
Please let me know if you prefer to undo the edits yourself.Otherwise, I'll do that next week.

Thanks,
Zeev
anonymous_gushdan_mapper (2016-09-04 20:02:35+00:00): I don't see where on this wiki page it says that the track is still considered "under construction" if it is not open for passengers. Israel has a bunch of railway branches which are not open for passengers, yet not mapped differently than ones which are open for passengers.

The tracks are already present and working, and the construction contractor already handed them in to Israel Railways, who is already doing test runs with complete train arrays on the tracks.

Since trains *are* running on these tracks (even though they don't have passengers on them), I think that having the construction tags on the rails would not reflect their status in the real world, and the map should always try to map the real world as accurately as possible.

You can see I've left the "construction" tags on the station buildings themselves and haven't added station nodes, since these are not open to the public just yet.

If you disagree, feel free to revert my changes.

Thanks.
anonymous_gushdan_mapper (2016-09-04 20:09:43+00:00): Also note that for hikers and such using the map, having the rails *not* marked as "under construction" is probably better: when a railway is under construction you don't expect trains to run on it, so you might feel like you can just cross it wherever you want. However, this track already has trains running on it regularly for test runs, so people hiking around should see them on the map and be aware they are active and therefor dangerous to cross.

Thanks,
E.
zstadler (2016-09-04 21:35:17+00:00): I think you have made several good points. Reading the wiki again, it is not so clear as I though.
Most important, IMO, is that you say trains are running on the tracks, which I was not aware of.
Thanks,
Zeev
richlv (2016-08-04 11:08:20+00:00): that's very unlikely to be a bakery...
is it even a real campsite ?
Supaplex (2016-08-04 11:00:49+00:00): There are several duplicated items. If you use Maps.Me when you travel to foreign country, please make sure to label in the favorite list, otherwise the app will upload what you add to the OpenStreetMap database.
Supaplex (2016-08-04 11:02:37+00:00): If the store or restaurant name is not in your language, just add the multilingual name by the OpenStreetMap web editor.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:17:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-08-21 08:49:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-04 14:18:18+00:00): Thanks!
kartler175 (2016-08-27 21:05:03+00:00): Bitte nicht einfach Fahrbahnen löschen, ohne sich um den Kontext zu kümmern und die Umgebung anzupassen!
http://map.project-osrm.org/?z=16&center=48.545535%2C10.727334&loc=48.547222%2C10.723616&loc=48.549839%2C10.720210&hl=de&alt=0
mavl (2016-08-04 16:35:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap.  
  
Номера телефонов нужно указывать в международном формате.  
  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone]
SomeoneElse (2016-08-04 12:54:23+00:00): Hello,
Please don't use the live server for test data.  If you want to test the API, you can use http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Best Regards,
Andy
Alecs01 (2016-08-04 19:38:33+00:00): Hi and welcome, this relation is quite strange for OSM standards, "site" should be a group of different objects, see: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site why not just adding the wikidata=* tag here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3449492050?
wildmaps (2016-08-04 11:59:18+00:00): Straße fehlt immer noch bitte richtigstellen!
tyr_asd (2016-08-04 12:04:07+00:00): Hi Miky, es dauert in der Regel ein paar Minuten bis Stunden, bis neu eingetragene Daten auf der Karte sichtbar sind. Bitte um etwas Gedult, Danke!
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:17:37+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
ika-chan! UK-USA (2016-08-08 07:41:07+00:00): Okay, this changeset was just pure vandalism and I had to revert it in the public interest and alert the DWG about this: I mean, this changeset just deleted everything and added nothing new (the same goes for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41252240, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41251897 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41251787). I mean, what do you have against us?
ika-chan! UK-USA (2016-08-08 08:53:40+00:00): As a courtesy I would take back the word "vandalism" and apologise for using the wrong term, but Hyderabad is a big city so a deletion like this could easily cause a scare.
yurasi (2016-08-09 20:04:51+00:00): Hola. ¿Podrías revisar este conjunto de cambios? Esa carretera existe?
DD1GJ (2016-08-04 14:03:05+00:00): Hello Krukrus, why do you need relations for wikitata? if you need links between OSM and wikidada, add wikidata-tags to existing OSM-objects. Yor realtions will probably be deleted soon.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikidata
Krukrus (2016-08-04 14:54:51+00:00): The only reference from Wikidata to OSM is towards a OSM relation. See https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18201640
The Property:P402 explicitly refers to a OSM relation. I found a couple of those references pointing to OSM *nodes*, that were not part of any relation, hence could not be referenced at all from Wikidata. Embedding the nodes in a containing relation made them available for referencing.
DD1GJ (2016-08-05 04:58:32+00:00): https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:OpenStreetMap#Linking_from_Wikidata_to_OSM

Wikidata does not recommend adding a property for OSM IDs, because they are not stable, and based on suggestions from the OSM community

Also the OSM community is not amused about redundant relations only to support things outside OSM. We support Wikipedia and Wikidata-tags which should be sufficient.
Supaplex (2016-08-04 14:42:15+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
muralito (2016-08-05 02:16:41+00:00): Hola. Esto es convenience. supermarket es para superficies mas grandes.
Alecs01 (2016-08-05 16:26:36+00:00): Ciao Santo e benvenuto, è già presente la libreria: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3629228571, ho cancellato il doppione
Tomas Straupis (2016-08-04 20:25:54+00:00): Reverting crap.me rubbish.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:17:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
alphensebezorger (2016-08-11 05:16:52+00:00): Ik heb het adrespunt terug op de kaart gezet, zoals oorspronkelijk uit BAG geïmporteerd. Het adres zal nog wel bestaan. Nu is alleen de tag alpine_hut verwijderd, en kan het adres weer gevonden worden op OSM.
user_5359 (2016-08-21 08:44:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think you live in the middle of a street. And I miss your addr:housenumber and addr:street information
TheSwavu (2016-08-04 20:55:41+00:00): If you are mapping in NSW please use the NSW LPI Imagery and not the Bing Imagery

Thanks.
perox (2016-08-05 15:14:26+00:00): Thank you for making me aware of the NSW LPI imagery.
maraf24 (2016-08-04 21:19:52+00:00): Co to za tajne kody w nazwach?
I to nie są atrakcje turystyczne przeznaczone dla typowych turystów.
klemar (2016-08-05 06:36:56+00:00): To sa nazwy i nr lowisk wedkarskich. Atrakcje to może nie są ale nic innego nie pasowało. Pozdrawiam :)
maraf24 (2016-08-05 10:21:26+00:00): Akurat "nic innego nie pasowało" w ogóle się w OSM nie sprawdza i ma nawet swoją nazwę - "tagowanie pod render".
Łowiska należy oznaczać jako łowiska, ale z tego co widzę, nikt tego dotychczas nie robił. Trzeba więc samemu wymyślić oznakowanie, zgodnie z regułami OSM.
klemar (2016-08-05 12:44:46+00:00): Jesteś administratorem? to dodaj w kategoriach łowiska. Nie jesteś to powiedz do kogo napisać petycje. Bo kategori łowiska nie ma.
maraf24 (2016-08-05 14:04:33+00:00): Nie ma w OSM czegoś takiego jak kategorie.
A liczba elementów, które można opisać jest nieograniczona.
Jeśli program, którego używasz ma jakieś ograniczenia, np. kategorie i to w ograniczonej postaci, napisz do jego producenta.
Atrakcje, które dodałeś, zmieniłem na leisure=fishing, czyli miejsce do łowienia.
literan (2016-08-05 13:34:41+00:00): не надо описания точек ставить в тег name. Только название. Хожу и за вами исправляю
bus68 (2016-08-07 06:55:52+00:00): Здравствуйте, Literan!
Спасибо, не знал!
Руководствовался тем, что по одному лишь названию новый клиент не поймет о чем идет речь, а лишних два три слова сразу подсказывают, чем занимается компания. Например, количество тегов не достаточно, чтобы указать строительную компанию и ее специализацию. Да и автоцентра не нашел, есть лишь автосервис, а это разные вещи.
Итак на картах множество информации, в которой пользователю порой сложно что-то найти. А в description не каждый человек полезет. 
Просьба не удалять краткие дополнения через дефис или объяснить как найти подходящие теги.
С уважением, Сергей
literan (2016-08-07 20:20:55+00:00): Подходящий тег - description=..... Тада пишите, что хотите, не длиннее 256 символов. А уточняющих тегов масса - ищите через http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ или придумывайте свои (но подходите к делу взвешенно)
maraf24 (2016-08-04 21:23:15+00:00): Aplikacja, której używasz, nie nadaje się do umieszczania specjalistycznych informacji w OSM.
Do tego trzeba najpierw znaleźć lub wymyślić odpowiednie tagi.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Main_Page
maraf24 (2016-08-04 21:17:31+00:00): Numery słupów umieszczamy w polu ref, a nie w nazwie.
bxl-forever (2016-08-19 11:45:26+00:00): Hi TeamVollgas,

Good job for this!  I am currently doing the same thing for other bus routes and it’s great to see other people contributing.  I suppose you derive the stop_positions from information published by STIB/MIVB on the Brussels Open Data portal: the X/Y coordinates they provide is supposed to match the front position of the vehicle.

Just two pieces of advice:

1. Don’t bother too much about giving the stop positions a name, this is not mandatory and in the longer term we will pack the stop positions, the platforms and all kinds of equipment within a relation.  Also, having duplicated names on several nodes is annoying once a name must be changed.

2. Please use more detailed titles for your contributions: "stop_position nodes added and named" is not enough.  I suggest mentioning the route, the area or the stops you have been working on.  This will help you in the future, and will also prevent other users to believe that you are spamming the website.

Have a nice day and keep on the good work.
Baloo Uriza (2016-08-05 19:02:37+00:00): This is a pretty strong edge case.  I used to run service calls to this location and was usually given the address 1 Technology Ctr for the location.
John Gregorovic (2016-08-05 20:38:49+00:00): Working in the building, and receiving mail there, I'm confident the address is One Technology Center building at 175 E. 2nd Street.
Baloo Uriza (2016-08-05 20:57:47+00:00): OK, I think we're in a situation where we're both technically correct, since it's not uncommon for buildings to have a postal address different from street address.  I'm in no way saying you're wrong (particularly since that would be where I would expect 175 2nd St to be, and 1 Technology Ctr actually took asking for directions to figure out).  But now we're running into OSM's philosophy of "map what's posted" (1 Technology Center) versus what the postal service knows (though, I'd imagine both addresses would be valid to the postal service).  A similar situation exists with Williams Center and Williams Tower addresses down the block...

More confusing would be that an address on 2nd Street #400, 400 Williams Tower II, or 2 Williams Tower #400 would be interpreted as equal street addresses...do we even have tagging for this local idiom?
mavl (2019-04-24 16:19:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.