piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
simone_girardelli (2017-08-30 18:19:50+00:00): Io son Trentino, ma con l'inglese non vado benone, altrimenti perchè userei il tranlate engine?

Scusa il ritardo.

Ricapitolando la mappa Kompass, ha un suo copyright che non consente la copia, e soprattutto il riuso del dato.

Su OSM il problema della fonte non va sottovalutato, perchè oltre ad essere attendibile, dev'essere libera ed aperta all'uso commerciale.

Per quanto riguarda wikipedia, hai ragione, ma c'è un ma, se guardo lo storico della cronologia, qualcuno, in forma anonima, ha corretto 6 giorni fà la quota:

https://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cima_Sette_Selle&diff=90705705&oldid=86305692

Senza citare la fonte, cosa di cui wikipedia è particolarmente attenta, sei stato tu?

Detto questo, ne abbiamo parlato in mailing list italiana, per cui la quota è sicuramente quella corretta da te, il problema è la fonte.

Se dici di avere una traccia GPS, con le quote in quel punto, se ti va, caricala in forma pubblica e cerca di mantenere il tag "ele" nel file *.gpx (ti consiglio viking che esportando mantiene questo tag), così riporti nella nota, il source=gps, ovviamente devi mettere il valore risultante dal file GPX.

Purtroppo il problema è la fonte non il valore, su cui posso concordare, facendo ricerca, ciò riportano varie fonti proprietarie (ovvero fonti coperte da copyright restrittivo, che non permette la copia nemmeno per uso commerciale).


Ciao.

PS: se vuoi vedere la discussione pubblica è qui (aperta da me):

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-August/059656.html

Per intervenire devi essere registrato, non serve la user e password OSM, ma la tua email ed eventualmente crearti una password, qui la lista:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Se vuoi c'è anche al lista trentina, però scrivono pochi:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it-trentino

Occhio perchè a volte arrivano molte email, vedi tu se mettere una email che usi di solito, oppure crearti una mail fittizia.
Nick Manini (2017-08-30 22:21:27+00:00): Ciao Simone!

1- No, non ho registrato la traccia GPS, l'ha fatto mio figlio, ma questa settimana e` via, non ho accesso al suo cellulare.  E comunque la precisione del GPS dei cellulari sull'elevazione e` sui 20 m, abbastanza per distinguere tra la quota sbagliata e quella giusta, ma non abbastanza per misurare una montagna, e dare un dato preciso al metro.

2- Questa cosa del copyright e` assurda.  Sarebbe come dire che chi ha inserito Milano in OSM avrebbe fatto qualcosa di male a copiare il nome da una qualsiasi mappa copyrightata. Kompass e gli altri editori di mappe e atlanti hanno il copyright sulla MAPPA, non sul MONDO, che ha nomi, altezze, tipi di terreno, strade ecc. che sono informazioni liberamente disponibili. In particolare sicuramente le posizioni e quote delle montagne Kompass e` andata a copiarle dalla base delle mappe dell'IGM 1:25000, mica e` andata a misurarle una per una.

3- Si`, io ho aggiustato il dato in wikidata (nel testo era gia` corretto prima), ma non certo in forma anonima, se guardi la talk della pagina https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cima_Sette_Selle ho segnalato la correzione giustificandola e firmandomi.

4- sono in anche troppe mailing list, non esageriamo.  Il mio interesse per OSM e` molto pratico: lo trovo uno strumento simpatico (specialmente in app) e se posso contribuire qualcosa lo faccio quando posso se ho un attimo.

Ciao,
Nick
simone_girardelli (2017-08-31 18:45:37+00:00): 1- 20 Mt, non sono 130 Mt come prima, e comunque sono disponibili in forma open data una vlta caricata e registrata la traccia, tag ele permettendo.

2- A Milano ed in regione Lombardia in generale, esistono i portali OpenData, ovvero portali che rendono disponibili le informazioni in forma pubblica che ne consentono anche il riuso:

https://www.dati.lombardia.it/

Per il comune di Milano:

http://dati.comune.milano.it/

In OSM hanno usato questi ed altri dati perchè la licenza OSM, questo permette:

3- alcune fonti per delcidarti, sono da prendere con le pinze, perchè l'Italia è l'Italia, ma sono solo un indirizzo per capire e farti un'idea:

1) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Potenziali_fonti_di_dati

2) https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dati_aperti

3) (lascio a te scegliere i video) http://aliprandi.blogspot.it/2015/02/tutto-su-open-data.html

4) https://www.slideshare.net/napo/opendata-suggerimenti-per-dati-di-qualit

5) Simone Aliprandi in generale e ti lascio guardare un pò di tutto, così ti fai un'idea:
http://aliprandi.blogspot.it/

6- Il fatto che ti sei firmato su Wikidata, ti rende onore, ma tu non sei una fonte, in questo caso la ffonte è Kompass, e kmpass ed altre fnti che non rilasciano pubblicamente i dati in forma libera, dichiarandolo, non sono fonti, scusa il gioco di parole.

7- Per le mailing list, pazienza, comunque hai sicuramente visto le risposte al mio quesito, per cui un'idea sicuramente te la sei fatta, e chi mi ha risposto, ti assicuro è persona "navigata" dal punto di vista giuridico.
Nakaner (2017-08-20 19:52:24+00:00): Hallo hermann51,

vor etwa 20 Tagen haben mehrere Mapper dich darauf hingewiesen, dass du an parallel zu Straßen verlaufenden Fuß- und Radwegen keine Namen ergänzen sollst, weil die Community das für unnötig hält. Bitte respektiere die Meinung der Community und passe dein Mappingverhalten dahingehend an!

Zur Erinnerung: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50613422
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1431

Anscheinend war die 0-Stunden-Sperre, die wir dir verhängt haben, kein ausreichender Schuss vor den Bug. OSM ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt und Alleingänge wie deiner sind mit den Prinzipien des Projekts nicht vereinbar und können befristete Benutzerkontensperrung zur Folge haben!

Bitte stelle sicher, dass in deinen Benutzereinstellungen eine gültige E-Mail-Adresse eingetragen ist und du diese E-Mails regelmäßig liest.

Viele Grüße

Michael
gitouche (2019-01-21 10:37:55+00:00): Bonjour,

Je suis tombé sur ces objets sans tags : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517054114
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517054115

Qu'as tu essayé de dessiner? l'étendue d'un bassin d'eau?
FloSka (2019-01-21 12:09:28+00:00): Bonjour,

oui c'est exact mais je n'avais pas réussi
gitouche (2019-01-21 16:38:47+00:00): Ok, je l'ai déclaré en bassin en utilisation la relation multipolygon.
Jarek 🚲 (2017-08-20 17:13:34+00:00): Link: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51156091

I tried looking at where the appliance repeair actually should have been, but as far as I can tell, 9200 Dufferin is up by 407, internet finds an "Thornhill Appliance Repair" not "Vaughan Appliance Repair" at 9200 Dufferin, and the postal code L4K 0C8 is further north still at Rutherford. So unfortunately no usable information to be rescued from the changeset, so just reverted.
Commodoortje (2017-08-20 18:45:54+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Андрей Николаев (2017-08-20 17:07:25+00:00): Вопрос к знатокам. Изменил границы д. Белоусово и теперь часть дороги с тегом highway=tertiary, проходит по деревне. У этого участка есть название: ул. Широкая. Так вот вопрос. Нужно ли менять статус куска дороги, проходящего по территории деревни на highway=residential?
literan (2017-10-14 10:52:38+00:00): Нет, конечно же не надо. Статус транзитной дороги должен сохраняться в населенном пункте (если нет объездной дороги)
ChrissW-R1 (2017-10-19 14:36:23+00:00): Please have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1179293
Jarek 🚲 (2017-08-20 17:50:04+00:00): clickable: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50114659, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1055703
Commodoortje (2017-08-20 18:57:30+00:00): MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
Commodoortje (2017-08-20 18:59:31+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik het iets aangepast.
Het is overbodig op met MAPS.ME een tag name:nl toe te voegen, dit doet in Nederland niets.
(Behalve in Friesland, waar vaak Friese namen de officiële naam zijn.)
Hier kun je zien wat ik heb aangepast.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51284116
Commodoortje (2017-08-20 18:51:42+00:00): Ik heb de node samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode. Ook heb ik de overbodige tags verwijdert.
Het is overbodig op met MAPS.ME een tag name:nl toe te voegen, dit doet in Nederland niets. Ook de vreemde talen met dezelfde NL spelling heeft geen effect.
(Behalve in Friesland, waar vaak Friese namen de officiële naam zijn.)
Hier kun je zien wat ik gewijzigd heb.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51283898
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-08-21 00:17:59+00:00): South Parade is a private gated road, are you sure it has a speed limit?
muralito (2017-08-21 22:34:03+00:00): Hola. ¿Que fue lo que quisiste mapear en el parador?
user_6110846 (2018-01-23 20:21:46+00:00): Начните пользоватся при риовке полиигонов Джосм или рисуйте в Украин ечстото другоен не полигоны Вы в кучу набросали полигоны Один  полигон наехал на другой Попросите своих друзей в русском сообществе научить Вас пользоватся компонентом мультиполигоньі в проге Джосм
kreuzschnabel (2017-08-23 05:51:35+00:00): Kein Mensch würde Wohnhäuser direkt in einen Sumpf setzen. Sicher hast du etwas Sinnvolles mit deinem Edit gemeint, aber das sicher nicht. Kannst du es etwas genauer erklären? Am besten als nächsten Kommentar hier im Changeset. Dann finden wir sicher eine Lösung.
kreuzschnabel (2017-08-23 05:56:17+00:00): Ich hab das mal auf residential zurückgeändert, aber deine description stehen lassen. Hinter „wetland“ gehört auch keine deutsche Beschreibung, sondern einer der etablierten Werte, die im Wiki stehen (Sumpf, Marsch, Moor, was auch immer das ist).
Chrysopras (2017-08-24 09:47:04+00:00): Und wenn es da laut description eine Quelle und einen kleinen Bach gibt, dann braucht man das nicht in der description zu verstecken, sondern kann Quelle und Bach einfach einzeichnen – wäre schön!
kreuzschnabel (2017-08-24 10:52:30+00:00): Ich hab den Freiraum in der Ortsmitte mal nach Luftbild mit Naturflächen gefüllt (der scrub ist evtl. eher wood, zumindest teilweise). @Hoidoiho: Bitte verwende für Schlüssel wie surface=* (beim Bolzplatz) die etablierten Werte, die im Wiki stehen, sonst sind deine Eingaben kaum auswertbar und fast wertlos. Wäre schade. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
izsolt (2017-09-15 10:54:13+00:00): Helló

Szeretném megkérdezni, hogy ezt a jelzést miért törölted?
mapillaryn van róla egy csomó fénykép.. 
Megtennéd hogy revertálod?
köszönöm
Domcsi (2017-09-15 11:32:10+00:00): Visszaraktam:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52066066
kapazao (2021-05-28 11:46:09+00:00): Hi, where did you get the street name Calle Amador A. Serrano Moyano, el "Titi"?
NanyBooooom (2022-10-08 10:58:57+00:00): Hi! Sorry I didn't answered before...

I got it in-situ, there's a plaque in the westmost end of the street (nearest to "Calle Feria").

I've checked and it is also visible online, in the "big G" maps.
NanyBooooom (2022-10-08 11:03:29+00:00): And I've updated the name, since it's a "Pasaje", not a "Calle" anymore
kapazao (2022-10-10 08:41:44+00:00): Thank you
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-08-21 00:15:13+00:00): Bicis y Más are closing down and no longer serve food
Hjart (2017-08-20 19:34:11+00:00): Er det virkelig nødvendigt med de her kunstige restriktioner? Skulle forbindelserne egentlig ikke bare være 90 grader +/- 5 på Vejlevej?
Robert Whittaker (2017-08-21 13:14:16+00:00): Did you make a mistake here, as you seem to have set addr:postcode=3 on the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162890123/
TVB-Kitzbüheler Alpen (2024-01-12 06:39:11+00:00): Hallo geow,
Du hast im Jahr 2017 beim Schwentlinghof Gatter ein access private gesetzt. Dieser Durchgang wird öffentlich stark genutzt, wie bist du damals darauf gekommen. Grüße ein erstaunter Touristiker
geow (2024-01-12 21:52:35+00:00): Servus Kollege, welchen node meinst du genau, vielleicht den?https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5046807574/history
geow (2024-01-18 21:39:56+00:00): @TVB-Kitzbüheler Alpen aka Arbeiter_Fußball, laut deiner PM von heute geht's dir um diesen Knoten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3051148151/history
Da ich die Bedeutung von access=private verstehe, war das im August 2017 wahrscheinlich schon richtig, aber die Wegführung/Zugangsbeschränkung wurde in der Zwischenzeit offenbar geändert.
SomeoneElse (2017-08-24 15:18:31+00:00): Hi,
I suspect that people here might have been trying to say "this is a barber's and not a hairdresser's".  If you look at the subtags for hairdresser you'll see that it's often tagged that way: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/hairdresser .  Mechanical edits to OSM do need to be discussed as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct so that information is not lost (as it has been here) and so that data consumers are aware of the change and can handle it accordingly.
Are you going to retrospectively discuss it, and add back information that has been lost, or do we need to revert these changes?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
goedegazelle (2017-08-27 08:03:19+00:00): Hi,
I think that it is best to revert this edit. Hope I can fix this myself.
Regards.
goedegazelle (2017-08-27 08:07:38+00:00): "or do we need to revert these changes?"

Please do so, I can 't find out how I can do that from here. My apologies for the inconvenience.
Regards, 
observer
SomeoneElse (2017-08-27 08:37:08+00:00): No problem - done.
Commodoortje (2017-08-21 06:21:00+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/Commodoortje

Klik op de link "meld u aan om mee te praten" om een reactie te geven in deze changeset.
Commodoortje (2017-08-21 06:21:57+00:00): Revert due to ignorance.
Bedoel je hier dat heel Scheveningen een attractie is?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 08:54:49+00:00): Hello!

I know that it is an ancient edit, but maybe you are still mapping in this area...

What you meant by https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5046856419/history ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)
saintam1 (2023-03-22 09:20:09+00:00): Hello Mateusz!

It's an office where you can sign up for internet service. TVNet is an ISP.

Other shops like this in Sofia are  tagged shop=telecommunication -- that's probably what this should use actually. Happy to make the change.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 12:23:35+00:00): Yes, I think it would be better. Still not fully clear are they selling services or equipment but seems better
saintam1 (2023-03-22 12:34:49+00:00): Cool, that's done
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-24 14:10:49+00:00): Thanks for changing!
Mike Baggaley (2017-08-22 13:17:36+00:00): HI, I see you have added access=no to footway 223062606, which also has foot=permissive. If you intended this to mean that there should be no pedestrian access, then you need to remove foot=permissive which overrides access=no. If you intended this to mean that there is no other access than foot, then access=no is not required because a footway only allows pedestrian access unless other modes transport are tagged positively (=yes, permissive etc). A footway with different values for access and foot causes confusion as to what the mapper meant, so can you please remove either the access or foot tag.

Thanks,
Mike
markbeverley (2017-10-03 15:48:46+00:00): Hi Mike, thanks for the info. I have updated the relevant paths - feel free to check. They are National Trust footpaths so permissive and foot only.
literan (2017-08-21 11:26:16+00:00): у вас получилось, что вся территория покрыта лесом. Однако на снимке отчетливо видно, что это не так (и на крыше детского сада тоже деревьев нет). Здесь нужно рисовать аккуратнее, тщательнее (и, возможно, использовать мультиполигоны)
mydata_biz (2017-08-21 12:02:48+00:00): да, согласен
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:48:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
Alecs01 (2017-08-21 17:43:57+00:00): E' già presente nella mappa, non duplicare informazioni per favore, shop=outdoor come tag non ha nemmeno senso in questo caso
mueschel (2017-08-29 11:24:45+00:00): Hi,
you added several relations with only foreign tags - could you change those to common OSM tags?

Cheers, Jan
ToeBee (2018-03-05 06:03:11+00:00): This edit has been reverted. You deleted a lot of useful information. I suspect you may not have realized that this is a shared database and the changes you made affected everyone, not just your local copy of the map.
dsh4 (2017-08-21 03:43:17+00:00): Hi David,

I see you changed Route 40 north of 471 from primary to trunk.  We're discussing that, and another recent edit of yours, on the forum, here: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59454

You are welcome to join the discussion there.

Cheers,
דוד-צבי (2017-08-21 10:32:09+00:00): The road in this section is part of a plan for a road that will cross the city from the east (west of the Sirkin camp). See the http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=51286946#map=16/32.0798/34.9041
dsh4 (2017-08-21 18:57:28+00:00): Sure, but those plans don't affect the "highway" tag's value.  The "highway" tag's value should reflect the current status of a road; there are other tags for mapping the planned (future) status.
דוד-צבי (2017-08-22 15:19:03+00:00): Right about planning. Mistake.
But regardless, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Israel - "First rule for numbered roads: The category is determined by the color of the sign, not by the number of digits!" (Conventions and Guidelines> Inter-city Roads)
The signpost of Route 40 is red
dsh4 (2017-08-23 01:57:28+00:00): That rule suggests that the portion of Route 40 north of this changeset and south of Sgula Junction should, too, be upgraded to trunk.

Point taken, though.  If I disagree with the criteria I'll start a new thread on the forums.  Cheers!
aceman444 (2020-11-10 12:28:55+00:00): Zdraivm, ak ste chceli pridat restauraciu, tak treba pridat bod s amenity=restaurant. Fiktivne znacky ako building_1,2,3 nemaju ziadny vplyv a nic neznamenaju. Zmysluplna zmena by bola zmena building=yes na building=hotel, kedze budova stavebne zrejme je hotel. Ze aj funguje ako hotel uz bolo vyznacene znackou tourism=hotel.
Ruhrpottkast (2017-08-21 19:39:41+00:00): Ist das Blocksignal 134 wirklich verschwunden?
Was ist denn die Quelle: "-"?
bigbug21 (2017-08-21 21:34:44+00:00): Die Signale in diesem Bereich werden im Zuge der ESTW-Inbetriebnahme in diesen Tagen zurückgebaut, daher die Löschung.
Ruhrpottkast (2017-08-21 22:37:23+00:00): Aber nicht Bksig 134. Sag ich jetzt mal so in den Raum. Ich selbst werde erst in einiger Zeit wieder da sein, aber die Blockstrecke zwischen Hbf und Oberbarmen ist doch vom ESTW-Bau nicht betroffen.
literan (2017-08-21 10:58:55+00:00): please do not vandalise the map
woodpeck_repair (2017-08-20 23:20:40+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 51276382.
woodpeck_repair (2017-08-20 23:25:50+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 51262654, 51276382.
Ruhrpottkast (2017-08-21 19:29:11+00:00): Der Eisenbahnatlas ist übrigens von Schweers+Wall, nicht von der DB.
yuryleb (2017-08-21 05:41:01+00:00): Не стоит воевать с правками. Кроме того, тематические парки - объекты на открытой местности, включающие в себя и здания, но не наоборот
Anton Khorev (2017-08-23 01:09:30+00:00): Не стоит делать правки только потому, что где-то заметка оставлена.

Если не нравится тег tourism=theme_park, придумайте другой.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-09 22:56:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 51890800, 51894086, 51892760, 51889245, 51890034, 51891226, 51893828, 51893158, 51891654, 51893514, 51888634, 51892002, 51892379 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/tracing from Instituto Geográfico Militar. User cartosmapas did not answer my questions but read the user block message. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1468
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:37:13+00:00): Olá, lincsat.
Nesta sua edição você criou uma proibição de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Supaplex (2017-08-21 03:40:03+00:00): 等等，學校裡建築還在啊，那是避難所點位錯了
DarkenSiva (2017-08-21 04:26:05+00:00): 已移除避難所資訊並補上原建築物
AdVerburg (2017-08-23 07:26:54+00:00): Is het mogelijk zo dat bussen hier wel mogen rijden? Nu zijn de buslijnen 45, 47, 48 en 84 daar onderbroken.  Met vriendelijke groeten Ad Verburg.
lucdg (2017-08-23 12:23:56+00:00): Dag Ad,

Bedankt voor je reactie. Nee, bussen kunnen vanuit de Scheldestraat het rond punt niet meer op, enkel fietsers en voetgangers. Dat blijft ook definitief zo. Ik vermoed dat, als ze nog langs de Scheldestraat zullen rijden, ze naar het rond punt van de Brandweerstraat moeten en dan terugkeren naar het nieuwe rond punt zoals iedereen. 
Op de website van De Lijn vond ik in ieder geval al deze informatie (die wel tijdelijk is tot het einde van de werken in de Molenstraat – Kloosterstraat): https://static.delijn.be/Images/Gavere%20omleiding_tcm3-16011.pdf 

Mvg,

Luc
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-09-02 02:04:56+00:00): Hi IanWilliams. can you please check this short way https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/517125245. 
I just wanna make sure that this way is added intentionally cause it detected as stub end in my JOSM validator because it's too short. thanks in advance
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-09 22:56:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 51890800, 51894086, 51892760, 51889245, 51890034, 51891226, 51893828, 51893158, 51891654, 51893514, 51888634, 51892002, 51892379 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/tracing from Instituto Geográfico Militar. User cartosmapas did not answer my questions but read the user block message. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1468
Commodoortje (2017-08-21 06:16:39+00:00): MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
Commodoortje (2017-08-21 06:18:56+00:00): Ik heb de naam aangepast en de node samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
Het is overbodig op met MAPS.ME een tag name:nl toe te voegen, dit doet in Nederland niets.
(Behalve in Friesland, waar vaak Friese namen de officiële naam zijn.)
Hier kun je zien wat ik gewijzigd heb.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51291460