piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2017-09-05 18:27:57+00:00): 您好，欢迎来到OpenStreetMap！
你已经改变了这里的一些国际边界，似乎造成了一些问题。 你能解释一下你想改变什么吗？
我们在OpenStreetMap中映射边框的方式在http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf中有描述。
最好的祝福，
Andy Townsend，代表OSM的数据工作组
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:20:42+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse secondary.
muralito (2017-09-05 19:07:15+00:00): Para ser clasificada como place=city tiene que tener mas de 100.000 habitantes...
AgusQui (2017-09-06 13:30:52+00:00): Según Wikipedia en 2010 tenía 87000 habitantes, tal vez ya tenga 100000, pero no se si se refiere a la ciudad o al municipio, con lo que es probable que no llegue a 100000 sólo en la ciudad.
literan (2017-09-06 12:17:38+00:00): Not bad :-)! Только зачем пекарню утащили на территорию РАНХиГС? http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=51757296 Я поправлю.
CkEsc (2017-10-27 23:23:11+00:00): 4й корпус из 8 этажей. А рядом с ним дома вообще нет.
KarmaCleaner (2017-09-07 17:52:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51819952 where the changeset comment is: cleaning vandalism
KarmaCleaner (2017-09-07 17:51:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51819935 where the changeset comment is: cleaning vandalism
ToniE (2017-09-05 17:49:42+00:00): Hello Hvalana,

Thanks for contributing to OSM, but ...
you should have taken a few seconds to see what is already on the map. Have a look 50 meters to the right and there it is already.

I'll delete you node, because it is a double entry.

Best regads
Toni
KarmaCleaner (2017-09-07 17:51:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51819900 where the changeset comment is: cleaning vandalism
RicoElectrico (2018-09-30 23:29:14+00:00): Hi, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5082102618

It should be a medical supply shop, not a pharmacy, right? Or is it both?
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:22:40+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:22:00+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
TZorn (2017-09-06 20:34:59+00:00): Hallo Stuessy,
könntest du bitte mit entsprechenden access-Tags noch angeben, ob der Weg für Fußgänger/Radfahrer/Reiter noch passierbar ist. Ein barrier=* unterstellt nämlich erst mal eine totale Sperrung des Weges. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=log
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
Stuessy79 (2017-09-07 07:57:12+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Tatsächlich würde ich den Weg fast schon als komplett gesperrt sehen, aber weil ich mich die Tage da mit dem MTB doch irgendwie durchgekämpft habe, habe ich den Weg und die Hindernisse jetzt mal als "dismount" gekennzeichnet.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:21:52+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:17:46+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:17:25+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:17:00+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:16:39+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:16:23+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
gileri (2017-09-10 18:48:48+00:00): Bonjour,
Sur le gîte :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66330662

Il faudrait en plus d'indiquer que la connexion internet est gratuite, indiquer aussi quel est le type de connexion disponible :

- internet_access=wired pour le filaire
- internet_access=wlan pour le wifi

Plus d'informations ici :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:internet_access
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:15:29+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
trigpoint (2017-10-02 17:51:15+00:00): I have removed the wikidata tags from the statue of Charles Darwin and the bust of Mary Webb.
I had linked to wikipedia sections on commemerations, not to articles about the person. The wikdata refers to the person, which is not correct in this case.
Cheers Phil
nyuriks (2017-10-02 18:16:52+00:00): Thanks!  I think it would be better to use "subject:wikidata" for both of them.  As for the wikipedia link - its a link to part of the page - which means the wiki page is not "about the feature" - so perhaps we should use something like "related:wikipedia" ?
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:15:15+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse unclassified.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:14:38+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse unclassified.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:13:53+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:13:28+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:13:16+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
ElliottPlack (2017-09-21 14:56:29+00:00): changeset under discussion on OSM US Slack: https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C1YP8DZ0A/p1502233346926171
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:12:19+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse unclassified.
dgitto (2017-09-05 21:44:10+00:00): Secondary  effettivamente lo reputerei eccessivo.
dgitto (2017-09-05 21:46:41+00:00): Non è vero comunque l'automatismo provinciale=secondary. Come largamente assodato nella comunità e sul wiki
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:11:53+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:11:00+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse unclassified poiché collega piccoli borghi.
dgitto (2017-09-05 21:40:48+00:00): Concordo il principio. Facciamo tertiary? Unclassified mi pare esagerato e non corretto.
Ramying (2017-09-06 06:15:42+00:00): Di sicuro non secondary.
Pensavo a unclassified perché l'unico villaggio che serve questa strada è Gimello, che non è comune a sé stante ma parte di Rometta.
Daalbadal (2021-04-16 01:46:15+00:00): Re-detail area
SteveOSM (2017-09-05 20:54:23+00:00): Apologies, left the old text in the description.  The Place de l'Eglise has been renovated, as has the parking adjacent.  The Bing Sat view is out of date.
SteveOSM (2017-09-05 20:53:53+00:00): Apologies, left the old text in the description.  The Place de l'Eglise has been renovated, as has the parking adjacent.  The Bing Sat view is out of date.
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:35:08+00:00): Olá, linhares12.
Nesta sua edição você criou 4 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
rza31 (2017-12-06 15:03:23+00:00): Hallo  rufus150949,
normale Wohngebäude bekommen keinen Namen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199100629 

Gruß rza31
GerdP (2018-10-13 08:46:35+00:00): Hi! I found two ways tagged genus=Musa (no other tags). Both described highways.
I assume you wanted to add that tag to something else?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566812639
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518930846
eggie (2017-10-29 15:38:27+00:00): Gebouwen horen zelf geen adresgegevens te krijgen. Hier heb ik ze verwijderd. Ze staan al op de BAG adresnummers van het kadaster.
Graag reactie
eggie (2017-10-29 15:41:55+00:00): Moet de straat hiervoor niet ook Tobias de Coeneplein zijn? Het is nu de Prins Mauritsstraat.
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:21:32+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse unclassified perché collega borghi, neanche comuni.
nyuriks (2017-09-06 06:28:35+00:00): hi, thanks for contributing, but the wikipedia link is broken. Please find a wikipedia article and link to it. Thanks!
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:20:57+00:00): Non vi è un nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa delle strade italiane e il value per highway in OSM. Questa strada era meglio che rimanesse tertiary poiché collega piccoli comuni, non centri d'importanza regionale.
Irma IRM-ED (2021-06-04 05:38:31+00:00): Hi helenst, 
Thanks for your digitizing, 
Your building digitizing is good, but your building is overlapping with a building.
Please check https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/521640445
I will delete it.
Thanks again :)
eggie (2020-05-13 09:22:00+00:00): Buiten Nederland begonnen met mappen.. dus nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
maxolasersquad (2017-09-06 13:00:31+00:00): You changed Saturday Road from being a road to being a fence? Was the entire road turned into a fence? If so we should remove the name "Saturday Road" from the way.
Alex Brickler (2017-09-06 16:34:43+00:00): The road was closed by fencing placed at the bend were it turned to the west to connect with Eisenhower. It no longer connects to Eisenhowr
maxolasersquad (2017-09-06 16:56:06+00:00): The road needs to be added back in and just the section that is gone should be removed. As it stands now, where there used to be a road name Saturday Road, there is a fence named Saturday Road. If you need some help feel free to PM me.
R0bst3r (2017-09-06 07:38:06+00:00): Hallo palla,
willkommen bei OSM.
Einen Node zu setzen mit einer note kann man machen, das bekommt aber niemand mit, wenn kein Tag fixme mit dran ist. Besser ist es auf der Karte einen Hinweis zu hinterlassen. Das geht mit der Funktion auf der rechten Seite (ähnlich einer Sprechblase).
Viele Grüße
MikeN (2017-09-06 01:33:15+00:00): Hi, for an address to be visible to search in OpenStreetMap, the number ( 231 ) should be typed over the light gray 123 below Address, and the street ( Tunnel Road ) should be selected from the dropdown.  The full text in 'name' is not required.   For the rare cases where it's used, it would be in a tag called addr:full , and would have to be typed out because it is so rare.
eggie (2017-09-08 14:15:44+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-08 14:19:18+00:00): Probeer niet te beginnen met access no. 
Dat kan er beter af. Er zijn veel meer uitzonderingen dan je denkt die hier doorheen mogen. 
Hier de defaultsettings voor de wegen in Nederland. 
restricties access

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
Ramying (2017-09-05 19:38:52+00:00): Si vedano i commenti dei suoi dataset che ha ignorato.
dgitto (2017-09-05 21:53:00+00:00): Le strade provinciali non sono secondary. È stato detto e ridetto ovunque che non c'è nesso tra la classificazione amministrativa italiana e il tipo di strada in OSM
KarmaCleaner (2017-09-07 17:49:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51819887 where the changeset comment is: cleaning vandalism
naoliv (2017-09-06 17:32:01+00:00): Was it necessary to remove the wikipedia tag?
Some consumers use it.
nyuriks (2017-09-06 19:10:23+00:00): Hi @naoliv, I renamed it to subject:wikipedia because the wikipedia article is not about this specific OSM object, but instead describes a concept - e.g. an article about McDonalds,  should not be used on a specific McDonalds, but instead be set as the subject per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia .  Same applies to a statue - it shouldn't link to WP about the person who is portrayed in the statue.  Keeping wikipedia & wikidata tags in sync is a good indicator of this approach.
naoliv (2017-09-10 19:51:52+00:00): Makes sense.
Thanks!
kartonage (2017-09-06 03:37:30+00:00): Hallo Furbrain,

Ich hatte gesehen, dass du bei deinen letzten zwei Änderungen versucht hast ein bisschen was herumzuschieben damit es besser auf der Karte dargestellt wird. Viele Sachen werden allerdings nicht in Mapnik, die Hauptkarte, dargestellt, sind aber trotzdem in den Daten vorhanden.

Beim Fressnapf hier würde ich übrigens ein shop=pet vorschlagen(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dpet), attraction=animal ist eher was für den Zoo. Als shop erscheint es dann sogar in der Karte.
Die Logopädie von deinem vorherigem Änderungssatz könnte mit healthcare=speech_therapist (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:healthcare) beschrieben werden. Hat sich noch nicht so durchgesetzt (und wird manchmal als Doktor getaggt), wird aber auch (noch) nicht auf der Karte dargestellt.

Ich hoffe, das hilft ein wenig. Bei Fragen gerne fragen und happy mapping!
Furbrain (2017-09-06 07:18:03+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Informationen! Das erklärt genau meine Irritation und meine Experimente, die du nachvollziehen konntest. Gibt es irgendwo ein Dokument, was auf solche "Darstellungsregeln" auflistet?
kartonage (2017-09-06 09:56:14+00:00): Unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Standard_tile_layer/Key gibt es eine Auflistung der derzeit angezeigten Symbole (und anderes) und deren Tags. Das dürfte soweit ich das sehe auch recht aktuell sein. Da kann natürlich auch noch was dazukommen, wie zb hoffentlich irgendwann healthcare=.
MikeN (2017-09-06 01:42:10+00:00): The residential neighborhood outline looks great!   The only other change is that the name should be in a tag called 'name'.  So, select the neighborhood outline, then in the "Add Field", select name , then enter the name.  After that, the 'Description' entry can be removed.
KarmaCleaner (2017-09-07 17:49:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51819857 where the changeset comment is: cleaning vandalism
bluetable (2018-01-15 07:51:44+00:00): Hi manpro,

As per the wiki documentation, this is a service area. Rest areas offer no services and are generally no more than a parking place with toilets. On the other hand, service areas usually have some kind of restaurant, shop, petrol station and other varied amenities.

Raststätte Wetterau offer this kind of services and therefore, IMHO, should be tagged as a service area. Please let me know if you think otherwise. You can find more information on the documentation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservices

Cheers,

freayd
KarmaCleaner (2017-09-07 17:47:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51819832 where the changeset comment is: cleaning vandalism
KarmaCleaner (2017-09-07 17:47:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51819822 where the changeset comment is: cleaning vandalism
josmougn (2017-09-25 21:34:31+00:00): les larges voies goudronnées utilisées par les voitures de service correspondent mieux à highway=service
Ambush (2017-09-07 10:52:27+00:00): Привет. Проверяете, как работает галочка "проверьте мою правку"? :)
Eugen der Ossel (2017-09-08 18:57:06+00:00): Why do you delete the swimming point?
4004 (2017-09-07 13:31:51+00:00): если обьект не открыт его либо не наносят, либо ставят теги (start_date/ proposed)
Pavelfantik (2018-05-11 20:35:33+00:00): start_date изучил
R0bst3r (2017-09-06 07:33:40+00:00): Hallo jrumpf,
willkommen bei OSM.
Sieht gut aus, besser wäre es noch, wenn die Häuser rechteckig wären. Das geht indem du einen Rechtsklick machst und die entsprechende Funktion auswählst oder mit dem Tastaturkürzel 'S'.
Viele Grüße
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-09-13 16:10:08+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please avoid adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Bad edits were reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-05 22:18:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 49980607, 49991449, 50145269, 50678488, 50680271, 50680487, 50696329, 50845907, 50854493, 50860209, 50865774, 50869959, 50874952, 50880553, 50886234, 50924075, 50947329, 50959079, 50959081, 50980137, 50988086, 51474371, 51474437, 51474608, 51474849, 51476775, 51476969, 51477020, 51477266, 51477315, 51478449, 51478567, 51478614, 51484256, 51484308, 51484438, 51484476, 51484527, 51484605, 51484651, 51484691, 51484744, 51484801, 51484849, 51484926, 51489800, 51497452, 51515423, 51516548, 51516922, 51518035, 51519085, 51519196, 51519663, 51526642, 51526837, 51526920, 51527084, 51550114, 51551601, 51553239, 51561951, 51562091, 51620959, 51621016, 51685958, 51686393.
Hjart (2017-09-05 21:43:31+00:00): Nørre Alle, Mellemtoftevej & Gamle Landevej giver helt afgjort indtryk af at være lokale hovedfærdselsårer der med fordel kan klassificeres som tertiære
Hjart (2017-09-05 21:46:15+00:00): "residential" er mere til "stille villavej"s-agtige veje.
Verdy_p (2017-09-06 05:07:32+00:00): tu as viré un chemin de la coulée verte selon ta "connaissance" mais il est bien là (et parfaitement tracé, pas en cours de destruction) sur les dernières images de mai 2017...
Verdy_p (2017-09-06 05:17:04+00:00): Bref je conteste totalement tes suppresssions, ta source=knowledge est très contestable et fait référence à l'ancienne route qui n'était pas là (elle passait plus à l'ouest) où tu as supprimé le nouveau chemin tracé qui reliait la rue Jean Marin en passant au nord du parking vers l'avenue des Monts d'Arrée. La route semble bien neuve, en parfait état, et pas du tout en cours de destruction ou en mauvais état
Thomas Petillon (2017-09-06 07:40:55+00:00): Bonjour Philippe,

Je confirme pourtant que la route a bien été déconstruite ces derniers mois !
 (Elle était temporaire, pour le temps des travaux de construction des bâtiments de la rue Jean Marin.) Un fossé pour l'évacuation des eaux est en cours d'aménagement et est presque terminé.

Quelques photos de la situation :
https://imgur.com/a/59t2r ;)
Verdy_p (2017-09-06 12:25:35+00:00): Difficile de trouver les dates cohérentes alors dans les imageries qu'on nous donne. visiblement nos fournisseurs s'arrangent pour que les photos qu'ils nous proposent correspondent aux données qu'ils ont dans leurs cartes, ou utilisent ça comme des "Easter Eggs".
Cependant mettre "source=knwledge" n'est pas la solution, il faut dans ce cas faire un relevé avec une autre source plus vérifiable. L'image imgur est plus raisonnable comme source, mais au moins elle montre la trace encore de cette route "temporaire" (et l'effacer complètement ne peut pas aider, il vudrait mieux utiliser un préfixe "destroyed:" et un end_date=* pour dater l'évènement du constat. Sur le site de Rennes2030 (dont les données sont de 2016), cette route y est bien, et il n'y a rien indiquant que c'était temporaire ou que des travaux étaient prévus à terme pour la détruire. On n'a qu'une date estimée montrant qu'elle ne serait plus là à terme en... 2030 (mais rien de précisé sur cette date, la carte montrant encore seulement un projet et aucun travaux "en cours").
Les PDF relatifs à l'aménagement de la zone ne donnent aucun calendrier et ne parlent jamais d'une route temporaire pour les travaux. Le cadastre non plus n'est d'aucun secours.
Thomas Petillon (2017-09-06 17:26:07+00:00): Mon dernier passage sur place datait de trois heures auparavant. Un « source=survey » aurait peut-être été plus exact. Mais pour un lieu du quotidien, la distinction est floue.

La datation de l'imagerie aérienne n'est pas toujours très fiable, c'est un fait. En l'occurrence, ça fait un certain temps que cette route a été défaite, puisque j'ai supprimé le way il y a plus d'un an : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40309603 Bing comme BD Ortho IGN sont plus anciennes que ça. Le réaménagement du parc se fait progressivement depuis.
Verdy_p (2017-09-06 21:31:30+00:00): En l'occurance c'est bing qui a passé ses indications de date ici de 2016 (où la route n'était pas visible) à 2017 (où elle l'est devenue et parfaitement, comme une route neuve avec juste un peu de traces de poussières qui me semblait normal vu le chantier autour).
De toute façon j'ai marqué à nouveau cette route comme détruite (au lieu de la supprimer), afin de conserver cette indication
Alexander-II (2017-09-05 22:10:29+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в ОСМ. К сожалению вашу правку придется откатить, потому что лицензия 2гис не позволяет использовать их данные в проекте ОСМ. Подробнее можете прочитать в их лицензионном соглашении и на странице вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%90%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B0#.D0.9D.D0.B5.D1.81.D0.B2.D0.BE.D0.B1.D0.BE.D0.B4.D0.BD.D1.8B.D0.B5_.D0.B4.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.BD.D1.8B.D0.B5
wambacher (2017-09-05 22:58:07+00:00): Hi, please stop this activities asap. the area of doklam is still disputet. there is no OFFICIAL agreement between all three states yet.

data working group (DWG) is informed and your changes will be reverted until the agreement is ok
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-09-13 16:46:30+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please avoid adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Bad edits were reverted.
zstadler (2017-09-26 16:21:18+00:00): Hi,
.
In this edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521668840 but it has no tags and it is not a member of any relation. Can you identify what it is?
.
Thanks!
zstadler (2017-10-02 17:15:13+00:00): Thanks for the correction!