piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
allseasonhiker (2022-04-10 20:13:28+00:00): Thanks for getting back. We all make mistakes and what you did was only a minor issue, so there's no reason to worry if this happens again. (if it's a mistake)

For future reference, you can tag your changeset with 'source=survey' if you looked at the area in person or 'source=local knowledge' if you did not visit the location, but you are aware that the road was finished.  You would also tag it with 'source=aerial imagery'.

I can revert my deletion of your road extension if you want so that it's back to where you had it. Let me know. Thanks.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-04 14:19:44+00:00): `=grave_yard` is for when it is in a temple, as you may see in with the `=religion`. General grave uses `landuse=cemetery`.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 13:59:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9634622257/history has cuisine = chinese;面 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Was it supposed to be cuisine = chinese
?

If extra character at the end is intentional - would it be possible to express that cuisine as an English value so it would be understood more easily? See some already documented values in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-04-05 02:47:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
You drew this park over about 11 new houses. This is obviously inaccurate.
If you choose to re-add it, you may want to refine its placement first.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
ivanatora (2022-04-04 07:24:19+00:00): Моля, слагай по-описателно заглавие на changesets.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
verttte (2022-04-05 22:59:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Хочу обратить ваше внимание, что ваши правки некорректы по ряду пунктов. Используется неправильный тип дорог. В вашем случае должна быть "служебная дорога". Для территории тип "Коммерческая" здесь не подходит - для школы есть свой тип территории (он указан у вас), для общежития используется "жилая территория". Само здание школы у вас отмечено территорией. Для этого есть отдельный тип здания. Если территория подготавливается к стройке есть тип "Снос/Расчистка". Помимо всего перечисленного не надо отмечать на карте того, чего нет в реальности. Если есть необходимость отметить планирующиеся объекты, то воспользуйтесь методами описанными в вики - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:proposed, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Lifecycle_prefix
Возможно что-то из отмеченного таким образом не отобразится на карте, но в ОСМ есть правило не мапить под рендер. То есть важно наполнение проекта, а не визуальное отображение.
Пользуйтесь справкой. Практически для каждого объекта есть описание. Его можно вызвать нажав "i" рядом с ним.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
Tetryk (2022-04-04 10:47:06+00:00): Ta relacja nie była zbędna. Czy wykazana była w jakimś walidatorze? Moim celem było wyrenderowanie alejek w f4map na terenie rekreacyjnym i właśnie w ten sposób to zadzaiałało (tak, wiem że nie mapuje się pod render ale uznałem, że relacja nie będzie przeszkadzać i generować błędów). To była pierwsza taka próba. Sam bym ją usunął jeśli nie byłaby przydatna.
B_KSL (2022-04-08 04:53:09+00:00): Raczej była. JOSM, Osmand zawsze takie coś wskażą jako błąd. Relacja z definicji powinna się składać z więcej niż 1 elementu. Jeśli jest tylko jeden to można go równie dobrze otagować w ten sam sposób jako zwykły wielokąt = relacja nie jest potrzebna = jest zbędna.
B_KSL (2022-04-08 05:12:06+00:00): ...osmose miało być zamiast osmand :)
Tetryk (2022-04-08 05:57:37+00:00): Ok, zmieniłem relację na wieloelementową
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-15 09:13:36+00:00): These buildings aren't very well aligned.  They appear to be pretty poorly drawn, and I assume it is because the AI service was use.  They aren't very accurate and create headaches due to the overall poor quality.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
Supaplex (2022-04-05 07:57:00+00:00): OpenStreetMap是國際的計劃，是能夠收錄多國語言的，請別輕易移除別的語言
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119283192
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
archpdx (2022-04-04 06:06:19+00:00): Hi,
It looks like you're having trouble with adding a new path: I think you accidentally dragged a node from an existing path instead of drawing a new line. I highly recommend you go through the walkthrough again as it shows you how to add new features: to do this press 'h' while in the editor and click on the 'Start the walkthrough' button. You can skip to the 'Lines' part of the walkthrough by clicking on it on the bottom of the page.

I would also remove the name 'Foot path' from the path as we don't use names to describe features in OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
StefanHRT (2022-04-04 03:34:07+00:00): Hi, Nur zur Info, macht in dem Fall keinen Unterschied. Das Thema oneway/oneway:bicycle war einst auch mal Thema in der Verkehrswendegruppe Berlin/Brandenburg und es gab diverse Tests mit Routern, das oneway hatte das Fußgängerrouting nicht beeinflusst ;) Finde aber auch das es so wie Du es gemacht hast besser aussieht. VG
questmarker (2022-04-04 11:06:23+00:00): Ja, mir kommt es halt merkwürdig vor so einen Richtungspfeil auf der Karte zu sehen. Das ein Fußweg wirklich nur oneway ist, gibt es doch extrem selten und trifft sicherlich nicht auf einen Bürgersteig zu.
StefanHRT (2022-04-04 11:15:58+00:00): Kann dich verstehen, mir geht es genauso mit den Richtungspfeilen ;) Fußweg als oneway kenne ich eigentlich gar nicht, glaube auf dem THF wurde mal ein Versuch gemacht aufgrund eines Drehkreuzes was nur eine Richtung zulässt, weis nur nicht ob der Versuch geklappt hat.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
Dimitar155 (2022-04-04 11:00:50+00:00): Информацията за детската градина следва да бъде на областта с amenity=kindergarten.
user_5359 (2022-04-09 14:46:52+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2725538793. I assume the tag "Mo 11:00-19:00;Tu 11:00-19:00;We 11:00-19:00;Th 11:00-19:00;Fr 11:00-19:00;Sa 10:00-17:00" = " 141" is copy & paste error. Can you correct this?
RedChevy (2022-04-15 14:17:36+00:00): Done it! Thanks for pointing it out.
Marek-M (2022-04-04 05:22:11+00:00): It seems to me that the edition of the following object in Poland was not intended by you. The data you added point to Kaliningrad.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/8162457417
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119284654
mtmail (2022-04-29 18:26:29+00:00): I've recreated the hostel in Russia now https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1538126783 and deleted it here (I simply don't know how to move a node across 1000s of kilometers).
gscholz (2022-04-06 04:09:55+00:00): Hi DianaRamirez015,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.51795&lat=-25.29484&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119284678

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-04-08 04:18:10+00:00): Hi DianaRamirez015,
these errors still exits. Can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2022-04-14 04:52:00+00:00): Hi DianaRamirez015, ,
du to your missing response I have reverted the changesets 119284678 and 119284665.
Guido
mavl (2022-05-20 15:57:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Violaine_Do (2022-12-07 20:45:56+00:00): could you please be more transparent on your changeset comments? it ease the understanding of what you did for other contributors
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119284810
user_5239402 (2022-04-04 05:19:43+00:00): 과거 양재 나들목 ~ 한남대교 구간은 경부고속도로의 일부 구간이었으나, 2002년에 이 구간의 관리권이 한국도로공사에서 서울특별시로 이양되면서 고속도로 구간에서 해제되어 일반 자동차 전용도로가 되었다. 때문에 이 구간은 고속국도법의 적용을 받지 않게 되었으며, 현재는 양재 나들목이 고속국도 제1호선 경부고속도로의 종점이다.
marczoutendijk (2022-04-04 08:13:38+00:00): Please reaad the comment in an earlier note about the correct use of the tags. A forest cannot have name=cofee if you want to show others that there are coffee trees!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119229656
Lastking228 (2022-04-04 20:56:26+00:00): salut emmanuel
kartonage (2022-04-04 05:56:59+00:00): The actual changeset comment should have been: "DZ: misplaced POIs removed".
ivanatora (2022-04-04 07:21:42+00:00): Please, do not commit changesets spanning whole continents.
ivanbranco (2022-04-04 11:16:43+00:00): Hi iWowik, 

I noticed this changeset because of  a "place=p" typo and I was about to restore the previous value: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/999847793/history

But then I also saw this place is mapped twice (as node [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1436595798/history] and as a way), the way was place=village and the node is place=hamlet. Since you edited there maybe you have local knowledge to say which one is right between village or hamlet?

Ivan
iWowik (2022-04-05 07:56:15+00:00): Thank you for the bug report,
place node and place boundary should have the same place value, so it is hamlet (settlement more than 300 inhabitants)
vaibhavnz (2023-03-03 23:28:32+00:00): Curious about this. Are there any good sources on this, or how it is accessed?
❤️‍🔥 (2023-03-04 07:22:32+00:00): hey, i'm guessing you mean https://osm.org/way/1047784277 - i'll DM you some photos when i get a chance. it's a pretty weird place, this is the only info i could find online: https://urbexcentral.com/2014/09/22/undercity-house-beneath-the-hotel
mavl (2022-05-20 15:57:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Stalker61 (2022-04-06 11:43:42+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Может уже хватит повсеместно гнать халтуру?
Эти актуальные данные для кого опубликованы?
https://docs.cntd.ru/document/819065625
https://admtyumen.ru/ogv_ru/finance/transport/dorogi/more.htm?id=11165300@cmsArticle
Под валидатор от wowik-а вносим данные? Молодец!
Телега в DWG отправлена. Правка вандального характера и будет откачена.
С наилучшими пожеланиями. :)
NetWormKido (2022-04-06 11:56:17+00:00): Здравствуйте уважаемый Stalker61, если вы нашли ошибку во внесённых мной данных, то можете её исправить. Также можете актуализировать валидатор, чтобы он соответствовал текущим документам.
Искренне ваш, NetWormKido
Stalker61 (2022-04-06 12:00:27+00:00): У меня с головой проблем нет. Посему развлекайтесь с валидаторами самостоятельно.
eggie (2022-04-04 08:07:58+00:00): Dag Peter  Ik zie een elementtaire fout. Je hebt aan een MP die een toponym is landuse forest toegevoegd!
Een toponym is een naamdrager.  Daar hoort geen landuse op. 
Je zult strak alleen nog maar bomen zien in het hele gebied... en alles door elkaar.
Waarom landuse forest toegevoegd. Er is hier toch al landuse gemapt?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-04 08:08:49+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119288029
eggie (2022-04-04 08:10:25+00:00): Hier is je fout... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/956151781#map=12/52.5408/4.6318
Kijk wat er gebeurt met de rendering in het hele duingebied. Paar keer ctrl f5 toetsen.
eggie (2022-04-04 08:30:34+00:00): De landuse = forest heb ik nu maar zelf van de  toponym verwijderd. De juiste endering zal wel weer terugkomen na verloop van tijd.
MVG
eggie
mavl (2022-05-20 15:57:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
eggie (2022-04-04 07:59:18+00:00): Dag kastdeur.. Je vraagt feedback.. 

Het is even de vraag of dat stukje naar het fietspad een highway=track is?  Of is het een highway=path? Denk ook dat motor_vehicle=no eraf kan. 
De beperkingen zullen pas na het hek gelden. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-04-04 09:40:28+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast met een stukje pad
danctc (2022-04-10 20:20:50+00:00): Hello.
The Boa Esperança station of the VLT was inaugurated on February 1 of that year (2022).

On the railroad operator's own website, CBTU, is described: https://www.cbtu.gov.br/index.php/pt/?option=com_content&view=article&Itemid=1102&id=9328. 

Therefore, the changes you have made recently are incorrect, please correct.
azakh-world (2022-04-11 09:14:50+00:00): Hi.
The tags on the station were misleading, so I changed them into some value. Thank you for the correction. I also removed 'disused' tags from some rails. Could you check if it's all right now? https://osmcha.org/changesets/119568362/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:35:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:35:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:33:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:35:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
user_5359 (2022-05-20 17:48:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556926594. What is the meaning of the tag rite = latin_rite?
habi (2023-06-21 16:32:55+00:00): Hey bednride

I guess this is not *named* as 'via ferrata', but should be *mapped* as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dvia_ferrata, no?

Greetings,
habi
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-26 13:43:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7577488361/history has width = 0 that was added in this edit
how something exist and have width=0?
Skyzzato (2025-11-26 16:28:24+00:00): No, It has width 0,25 meter.
eggie (2022-04-04 08:22:30+00:00): Dag Klaas.. Even een tip. Beschrijf svp concreet wat je hebt gedaan. Verbetering zegt niemand iets.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-04 08:26:11+00:00): Ook hier tag je dubble.  Dan krijg je dus twee P's  Alleen op het vlak graag.
eggie (2022-04-04 08:58:44+00:00): Parkingnode verwijderd
wielandb (2022-04-28 14:20:01+00:00): Heyho, 
ich hatte die Fläche von amenity=kindergarten zu landuse=education umgetaggt, wegen des Multiple-Schools-on-one-Ground-Proposals. Weil die Kindergärten sind ja schon eingetragen als nodes. 
Ist es okay wenn ich es wieder zurückändere?
Rhoon (2022-04-28 16:56:08+00:00): ja mache :)
eggie (2022-04-04 08:24:47+00:00): warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway 	1
warnings:disconnected_way:highway

Je pad zit nergens aan vast en zal niet routeren. Verbind zo'n pad met de andere wegen
gr eggie
eggie (2022-04-04 09:03:34+00:00): Pad vastgemaakt aan beide zijden..
eggie (2022-04-04 08:23:40+00:00): Beste Klaas Niet op een node amenity=parking en op het vlak. De tags van de node kunnen beter eraf.
Het is anders dubbel.
eggie
eggie (2022-04-04 08:59:15+00:00): Parkingnode verwijderd
Futur3r (2022-08-23 01:40:08+00:00): Bonjour,

pourquoi tu as supprimé le piste cyclable https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967640946 ?

La piste existe -> https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/futur3r?lat=45.944128745016&lng=6.0690505945827&z=17&pKey=300029071718390

Elle vient même d'être étendue.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119291210
Futur3r (2022-08-23 01:44:56+00:00): FYI, l'imagerie n'est pas à jour.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119291210
monsieur a (2022-08-29 06:47:45+00:00): C'est une erreur de ma part. Merci pour la correction. Je vais êtres plus attentif sur mes sources la prochaine fois.
<0174 (2022-07-27 18:07:47+00:00): Ahoj,
změnil jsem zpátky název Hořice (rozc.) -> Hořice (rozcestí), pro verzi se zkratkou je tam official_name.
Viz
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it)
tkk (2022-07-28 06:23:43+00:00): Ahoj, je smutné, jak jeden uživatel (Sten) způsobí, že reálná kvalita dat se výrazně zhorší, ohání se dodržováním pravidel (určených pro něco úplně jiného) a většina mu ještě nadšeně tleská. Viz https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-cz/2018-June/019261.html