piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
konrad_ickinger (2020-04-17 05:20:40+00:00): Tolle Leistung, so viele Adressen. Darf ich fragen, was die Quelle ist? Danke!
BeKri (2020-04-17 15:26:47+00:00): Jaaaaaa der Konrad Ickinger,
servus Du oide Fischhaut,
schon lang nix mehr von Dir gehört !

Ich weiß zwar nicht warum ich überhaupt auf die Frage eines
Sockenpuppen-Kasperl antworten soll 
aber lass es mich so formulieren:

Die einen gehen halt raus und tun was und
die anderen haben seit 2018-11-02 einen Account mit 
0 ! (in Worten NULL) Bearbeitungen
dafür sondern sie ein paar dumme Kommmentare ab.

Kapiert ?
Bitte !
woodpeck (2020-04-17 18:39:53+00:00): Hallo Bekri, eine passendere Antwort wäre gewesen: "Ich habe diese Adressen selbst erfasst. Darf ich fragen, wieso meine Beiträge die Aufmerksamkeit von jemandem erregen, der seit 2018-11-02 keine Änderungen vorgenommen hat?" -- Gleiche Message, ohne zu beleidigen ("Kasperl", "dumme Kommentare"). Die Frage nach der Datenquelle ist in OSM eigentlich immer berechtigt. Du hast ja nicht "source=survey" hingeschrieben, um die Antwort vorwegzunehmen.
BeKri (2020-04-17 18:57:29+00:00): Servus Frederik,
das hängt mit dem "Besserwessi" und anderen unschönen Bemerkungen über andere Accounts zusammen.
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9036847&commented
Ein "source=survey" hab ich noch ne hinzugefügt, weil ich das selbstrredend voraussetze, ich erfinde ja nix-.
Lg derBeKri
konrad_ickinger (2020-04-18 12:15:17+00:00): Die Antwort für Frederik: die Aufmerksamkeit wurde errecht, weil hier einfach sehr viele Adressen (auch von unbebauten Grundstücken) erfaßt wurden, was dann doch Zweifel an der Datenquelle 'survey' weckt. Und warum 0 edits: wenn ich mir hier den Umgangston der Antwort auf eine freundliche Frage ansehe, dann nehme ich lieber Abstand.
BeKri (2020-04-19 17:08:12+00:00): Schön, das man sich von einer Sockenpuppe die Arbeit in Frage stellen lassen darf, einem Feigling, der sich hinter einem Account versteckt um auszuteilen.
Ich halt das/ Dich für nicht freundlich.
woodpeck (2020-11-29 00:48:13+00:00): Also um da jedes Missverständnis auszuschliessen: Du, BeKri, hast jede einzelne dieser Hausnummern selbst in Augenschein genommen und garantiert nicht aus irgendeiner Quelle abgezeichnet, das ist Deine Aussage, ja? Und es ist definitiv nicht möglich, dass Du eine Hausnummer eingetragen hast, wo in Wahrheit nur eine Wiese ist, ja?
archie (2020-04-15 22:02:05+00:00): Would you kindly make those buildings rectangular, thank you!
mot_tom (2020-04-27 17:14:32+00:00): Hi DysguDdraig, welcome to OpenStreetMap! There are a few errors in this changeset that I'll point out just so you don't make them again! Firstly, Rhodfa Abernedd should be highway=proposed rather than highway=primary as it isn't built yet, I've edited that for you in this changeset [https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84211871]. Secondly, adding place names to residential areas when place names are already mapped is discouraged, as explained with other things in this wiki article [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice]. For example,Taibach was already mapped at [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/123573649] so adding the name to the surrounding residential area is unnecessary. Thirdly, I'd recommend reading this wiki article on multilingual names [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names]. I'm not from this area so I don't know if certain features (roads, rivers, railways, places etc.) are better mapped with their English or Welsh names, therefore I won't revert any of these edits. But this is definitely something to consider both for these edits and in future. 
All the best! mot_tom
naomap (2020-05-28 08:42:09+00:00): Bonjour.
J'ai restauré l'emprise de la gare de Sainte-Geneviève-des-Bois, que tu avais supprimée – je suppose une erreur de manip. J'ai déplacé le tag public_transport=station du bâtiment sur cette emprise, que j'ai ajouté à la relation stop_area.
Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité projet #CartoTransilien
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 14:22:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83654096 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3625
Osmegnos (2020-04-16 09:10:17+00:00): Hallo Syntrox,

willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast Autohaus König verschoben, welches meiner Meinung nach an der richtigen
Stelle gewesen ist. Bitte lese Dir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden
durch. Dann verstehst Du, dass man erst einen offset einstellen muss, anstatt  Objekte an Hand
eines nicht ausgerichteten Luftbildes zu verschieben.

Du hast, das Einkaufszentrum gelöscht, und neu, an Hand eines nicht ausgerichtetenen
Luftbildes neu eingezeichnet. Abgesehen davon, dass das Gebäude jetzt meiner Meinung nach
an der falschen Stelle ist, löscht man keine Objekte, sondern korrigiert sie. Es sieht nun so aus, als wenn das Einkaufszentrum neu eingetragen ist. Die Hiestorie des Objektes ist verloren gegangen. 

Ich schlage vor, Deine Änderungen per revert rükgängig zu machen. Dann kannst Du,
Deine Änderungen, neu eintragen. Dann bitte an den Offset denken.

Viel Spass.
Fanny IRM-ED (2021-06-24 06:43:01+00:00): Hi, UsuárioPar
I hope you have a great day, I just want to ask, this unclassified road crossing with reservoir (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/792345032) I wonder there is a bridge between water and highway or not? Or do you have any suggestions on what should I do? Thank you

Happy mapping :)

Olá, UsuárioPar
Espero que você tenha um ótimo dia, só quero perguntar, esse cruzamento rodoviário não classificado com corpo d'água (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/792345032) Será que há uma ponte entre as águas e rodovia ou não? Ou você tem alguma sugestão sobre o que devo fazer? Obrigada

Feliz mapeamento :) (translate by google)
user_5359 (2020-04-18 07:23:00+00:00): Hello! Wa´hat is the meaning of the key debug_NATURE (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/SZi)?
dmlu (2020-04-18 10:46:04+00:00): Hi, those keys slipped through my JOSM workflow/late night sessions. I added a validator rule to JOSM now, thank you again for bringing this to my attention :)
gscscnd (2020-04-16 07:13:08+00:00): Te dane adresowe są już otagowane na budynku <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277426944>, więc nie ma potrzeby dodawania ich na nowym węźle. Poprawione w <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83629795>.
sskalyan (2020-04-24 11:09:46+00:00): Hi,

We can add new relations to existing road segments, please do not create duplicate error segments in OSM. I'm reverting these edits, since it is causing overlapping segments.

Regards,
Kalyan
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83615798
Michaela McGee (2020-04-24 14:33:13+00:00): Hi Kalyan, 

Thank you for your help! I will go in to review those edits now.
Michaela McGee (2020-04-24 14:40:29+00:00): @sskaylan Thanks again for the help. There's a slight overlap of West Friendly Avenue at the West Friendly Ave/Pembroke Rd cross. 

I had tried earlier to remove the section of the route that overextends Pembroke Rd. Are you able to help point me in the right direction?
tuxayo (2020-04-15 23:13:32+00:00): errata: source BDOrtho IGN
note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2113483
azakh-world (2020-08-20 12:25:15+00:00): Hi.
You've marked some railway segments around way 792352902 as unused, though they are part of route relation "VLT de Maceió: Jaraguá ⇒ Lourenço de Albuquerque (6636197)" which is now torn. Have you consistent view of the situation on the ground?

Best regards,
Alexey
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:48:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83649963 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3617
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-06 22:46:09+00:00): Olá,

as restrições de conversão:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11002175

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11002177

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11002179

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11002181

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:48:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83649963 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3617
artem95vlasovets (2020-04-21 11:43:33+00:00): Hello. You added large building (way 792365670). I think, you wanted to add landuse=residential. I changed it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83617399
user_5359 (2020-04-16 06:03:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:46:18+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:17:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83648319 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3613
hsc666 (2020-04-17 20:53:56+00:00): Why do you change this public car park accessible to everyone to "private"?
CS reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83725767
ravsjith (2020-04-18 08:29:01+00:00): hi  hsc666,

thanks for your time in checking into our edits. i have made this access "private" as it is restricted by the lift gate from all  entry/exit. Do let me know in case it requires any more modifications. always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
Ravsjith
hsc666 (2020-04-18 09:19:58+00:00): Please check the wiki! access=private tag is used to indicate that it's not to be used by the general public. Lift gates are not a suitable characteristics for this. In this case, the lift gates merely force the payment of a usage fee. Nothing else. Please be careful!
Kovoschiz (2020-05-05 13:02:40+00:00): Please don't delete the lines and replace them with areas. Also, don't mix up `area:highway=` and `area=yes`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83620071
xenofondas (2020-04-16 04:15:07+00:00): Όταν κάνουμε κάποια αλλαγή στο χάρτη, να βλέπουμε μετά από 2-3-μέρες πώς έχει καταγραφεί, και αν μας ικανοποιεί η τροποποίηση τότε μόνο να την οριστικοποιούμε.
Γενικότερα το χαρακτηριστικό Highway : Pedestrian σε κλειστή επιφάνεια πρέπει να χρησιμοποιείται πολύ πολύ σπάνια, Κρύβει πολλά προϋπάρχοντα χαρακτηριστικά, επισκιάζει-κάθεται πάνω στα υπόλοιπα και μπορεί να κρύψει ακόμα και κτίρια!!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 14:15:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83653866 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3624
user_7130456 (2020-04-18 11:42:23+00:00): 哥，下次注意别把单独的道路加进中国国家公路网了
user_7130456 (2020-04-18 11:45:20+00:00): 还有，名称别放中英双语，英语烦请放到英文名称
AkuAnakTimur (2020-04-16 04:26:29+00:00): ("Jalan" is omitted)
Kovoschiz (2020-04-16 14:29:34+00:00): Please check the objects. This is HKSAR as a state not a city.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83622144
Kovoschiz (2020-04-16 14:31:07+00:00): Tin Hau is a well in use place name to refer to Causeway Bay East, and is meaningful comparateively. 
Should Braemar Hill not be a `=quarter` at least?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83622144
Kovoschiz (2020-04-16 14:31:49+00:00): Please don't delete the city node. You obviously don't understand what's their difference.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83622144
Kovoschiz (2020-04-16 14:44:08+00:00): Should Wu Kai Sha not be a `=village`? I don't see why you deleted Tin Sam as well.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83622144
Kovoschiz (2020-04-16 14:33:52+00:00): Please don't remove useful information by not re-implementing them in a correct scheme.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83622424
bernardo60 (2022-11-02 12:02:12+00:00): On which basis did you change the w549718519 to residential road? I had added it as a path, less than one metre wide, based on survey. This cannot be used by four-wheel vehicles!
IjRiver (2022-11-03 11:22:55+00:00): Hello bernardo60, VashonVashoff is no longer with the Apple Data Team so I will be handling this on their behalf. VashonVashoff split this highway at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5348417753 in order to change the section south of there to residential (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792398731) on April 15th of 2020. This change was made as the road provides access to many buildings and appears to be drivable by cars in aerial imagery.

Before that, the entire way of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549718519 was set to track from your path classification by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/armasari in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55567938 back in January of 2018. I see that you have already changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549718519 back to path. Thanks for the message and good luck.
Kovoschiz (2020-04-16 14:35:41+00:00): In this context, it is a `=suburb` under Tsuen Wan `=town`.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83622832
AkuAnakTimur (2020-04-16 05:03:58+00:00): Chinese name was given the priority because the gateway has only the Chinese name plastered all over in bigger typeface. See https://openstreetcam.org/details/2101922/432/track-info. The temple name in Malay is however, is on a signpost.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:06:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83647740 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3611
Otenkiya (2020-04-17 10:24:46+00:00): 貴方の編集により国道リレーションが壊れています。当方で修正しますが、今後は注意いただきますようお願いします。
Otenkiya (2020-04-17 10:32:20+00:00): そもそも道路外から自由に右折進入できる区間は、対向分離すべきではないと考えますが。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:28:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83648857 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3615
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:28:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83648857 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3615
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:28:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83648857 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3615
user_5359 (2020-04-18 06:51:30+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7409658691. What is the meaning of the tag "Macao Imperial Milk Tea"="milk tea"?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:11:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83647999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3612
user_5359 (2020-04-16 05:47:55+00:00): wrong change set commet: correct building inside building
tastrax (2020-05-04 01:10:49+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM - Cheers
user_5359 (2020-04-18 07:09:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on node http://www.osm.org/node/7409724285? what ist the meaning of the tag "Townhall" = "Barangay 97 Hall"?
mapanatinto (2020-04-27 02:12:17+00:00): Hi, Good day!

The node i contributed for Townhall of Barangay 97, Tacloban City, it is the barangay hall of Barangay 97, Cabalawan, Tacloban City.

Thanks for the comment. God bless.
geri-oc (2020-04-19 14:59:17+00:00): Konntest du das nicht beim "reparieren"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2160790
mit eintragen und in die "kaputte Relation" aufnehmen?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:28:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83648857 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3615
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:28:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83648857 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3615
PupInGear (2020-05-14 19:48:41+00:00): This edit has ben reverted.

Please note. There is a major construction project on I-75 in Michigan starting at the northern edge of Detroit and continuing north for approx. 13 miles. As such, much of the map imagery is out of date. There are also two other major freeway projects happening in Detroit proper, (1) on I-75 south/west of the Ambassador Bridge (intl. crossing) to build a second international bridge in the city and (2) to reconstruct much of I-94 going through the city. 

Please be aware of these when editing in/around metro Detroit as they tend to increase the number of edits by non-local users that could damage the integrity of the map in the short term.

Thanks,
StudentinGear
gohimans (2020-05-15 06:59:39+00:00): Hi StudentinGear,

Thanks for sharing the info about the current constructions going on in this area. We shall watch out for the recent edits before we make an edit to avoid re-work and reversion of changesets.

Regards,
gohimans.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:28:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83648857 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3615
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 11:45:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83646581 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3608
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:22:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83648583 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3614
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:22:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83648583 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3614
Trần Hải Quân (2020-04-16 07:22:15+00:00): Hoàng Sa, Việt Nam
SomeoneElse (2020-04-16 14:39:22+00:00): @Trần Hải Quân
The way that such disputes are judged in OSM can be found at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf . This particularly case is particularly difficult to model in OSM, as (at least in the case of the Spratlys) not only are there multiple claims but different reefs are actually occupied by the militaries of different nations. OpenStreetMap, as per the linked PDF, gives more weight to the actual “line of control” than some other institutions.

If you think, after reading that PDF, that the Paracels and/or the Spratlys are not correctly represented in OSM then please email OSM’s Data Working Group at “data@osmfoundation.org” explaining the problem in detail. However, please don’t just say things like “historically X belongs to country A” as that is way down the list of things that will be considered important. In cases such as this there are often multiple historical precedents, treaties, UN resolutions and other factors that can be taken into consideration and cherry-picking from these can be used to support a number of different political views.

One more thing - there should be enough information in OpenStreetMap to allow anyone to create a map of any country with its desired borders. This is important because some countries have laws about how they should be represented on maps, and those desired representations sometimes contradict each other (that’s why the representation at openstreetmap.org can’t please everyone - each set of map tiles covers the whole workd). If you’d like help creating a map of Vietnam showing its desired borders please ask, and I’m sure that someone will be able to help you.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:59:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83650467 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3617
Klumbumbus (2020-04-16 09:59:40+00:00): Hallo,
an der Treppe ist noch access=no getaggt. Hast du das vergessen zu entfernen?
VG
TS-R (2020-04-16 19:08:04+00:00): Hallo Klumbumbus,

danke für den Hinweis. Der Access Tag an der Treppe ist mir tatsächlich durchgerutscht. Habe ich soeben korrigiert.

VG TS-R
Klumbumbus (2020-04-16 19:18:39+00:00): 👍
VG
abakus_uploader (2020-04-16 22:31:04+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Britzz (2020-04-16 17:56:56+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).

Par ailleurs, vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : il est préférable de créer un nouveau point pour le magasin plutôt que l'ajouter à l'adresse existante.

Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83629531