piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-10-05 13:53:46+00:00): Diverse adresnodes teruggeplaatst
user_14232282 (2021-10-05 14:44:03+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Die adresnodes verwijderen was zeker niet de bedoeling, had niet eens door dat ik die verwijderd had... Zal inderdaad wel door slepen in edit modus komen. Dank voor het herstel van die adresnodes.
eggie (2021-10-05 14:55:20+00:00): No problem ... Kijk eens naar de betere editor JOSM. Daar schuif je met de rechter muisknop en selecteer je met links en kan dit niet gebeuren. 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-05 13:43:34+00:00): De pedestrian Mirasstraat zit niet vast aan de Neptunusstraat.
Achterommetjes /brandgangen kun je het beste op access=private zetten, anders gaan ze ongewenst meerouteren in routers. 
Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112122435
gr eggie
Heinz_V (2021-11-13 15:30:26+00:00): generic=farmland does not exist. You are worldwide the only mapper who is mapping like this. Please change the tag.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-10-06 07:43:02+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. L'etichetta highway=secondary non indica una strada secondaria  ma una strada di importanza regionale. Per favore, riclassifica correttamente quanto inserito, seguendo questa guida: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway Ciao, Andrea
skyper (2021-10-07 00:21:33+00:00): Hello Walid
Not all suggestions of iD might be correct or useful. Please, only change tags if you are sure what you do. Otherwise, just ignore warnings about objects you did not even touch.
There is no problem with `FIXME` as key and you do not need to change it to `fixme`. If though, please, be consistent and change it for all relations of the route relation and not just a few. As there are more problems with iD you might want to try a different Editor-Software like JOSM from the beginning.
Regards skyper
Andrea Musuruane (2021-10-06 07:45:05+00:00): Ciao. Anche in questo caso la classificazione non è corretta. highway=footway si usa per percorsi pedonali prevalentemente in ambito urbano. Inoltre, dalle immagini satellitari utilizzate non si vede questo percorso. Come è stato disegnato? Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2021-10-06 07:55:19+00:00): Ciao. Anche in questo caso la classificazione non è corretta. In genere per i sentieri si usa highway=path mentre per le strade ad uso agricolo o forestale (dove spesso ci sono due tracce parallele generate dalle ruote dei veicoli) si usa highway=track. Ciao, Andrea
Frans S (2021-10-05 14:17:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Most buildings are rectangular. Please square each building with the Q key , A rectangular building can be mapped with 4 nodes. (6 on an L shaped building

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112123642
tastrax (2022-03-28 06:02:54+00:00): There are currently of few folks cleaning up golf course tagging, predominately this is removing 'name' tagging on holes, greens and tees which is not required. You are likely to find that recent past edits that you have made will all get updated. It would be good if you could refrain from adding names to these objects into the future. Cheers
MarcoR (2022-01-08 14:26:46+00:00): Ho controllato questo gruppo di modifiche e non contiene errori (stando alle foto aeree).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112123702
Lee Carré (2021-10-05 18:33:12+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
laflovver (2021-10-06 06:24:05+00:00): yes, my mistake, there were just a lot of small and insignificant spam in names...next time will separate changes
SomeoneElse (2021-10-07 12:24:23+00:00): Hello,
Can you give an example of the "spam" that you removed?
Best Regards,
Andy
laflovver (2021-10-07 15:14:13+00:00): Hello, here some links for examples:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863486818/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973380481/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834535442/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/817480463/history

If you want more examples, they in ways history on this changesets. Or you can text me in direct messages and i will show you more examples. once again I apologize for upload such a big geographical size changeset.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-07 15:27:45+00:00): Thanks.  Looks like they're not spam as such but "names which are clearly not the name"
Incidentally, with regard to "q" as a name, at least one mapper has replied to me in the past because "the editor they were using gave a warning if no name was used".  It might help in some of these cases to have a chat with the people who added these names to OSM about https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only (or whatever the link is in their language).
Best Regards,
Andy
laflovver (2021-10-07 15:58:42+00:00): yeah, sure,  I will write him in DM if I see an active mapper who has such mistakes
Markus366 (2021-10-09 20:35:51+00:00): Hi.

I'm not happy with such an global anti-spam edit. To much possibilities that entries does not fit to your search pattern an are miss interpreted as spam. example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112589480/history#map=17/51.39660/10.32472 you delete the wright name of that river.

I repair that single way but if they were more example, the hole edit should be undo.

And please, don't edit the hole world at ones. Use smaller areas in order to make it easier to fix problematic edits,


Thanks,
Markus
laflovver (2021-10-10 09:34:01+00:00): Hello Markus.
Yes, we already talk about this with Andy. i will not upload such a big geographical size changeset in the future.
4004 (2021-10-10 23:16:33+00:00): I think you also missed the point that some of these are, while not proper names, not spam either - a few I've opened could've easily been moved to description/note etc.
laflovver (2021-10-11 04:35:45+00:00): Hello 4004. 
I revised the changeset again, all useful information I moved it to the description
Lee Carré (2021-10-11 12:12:15+00:00): “could've easily been moved to description/note etc.”

In that case, it sounds like the original changes were http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer rather than being concerned with data accuracy.

But, then
source = Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta); Mapbox Satellite
which, last I checked, don't show names of ways. So, this changeset is effectively source=null (since imagery_used should specify the referenced imagery).
laflovver (2021-10-11 14:15:55+00:00): Hello Lee Carré.
My bad is that I upload such a big size changeset.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names - Name is the name only. So ill try to fix the spam "q" "s / n" "I" from name tag.

The description what i move is:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972434504/history
In this case I'll think after @ 4004 comment that I can move it into description.

Maxar imagery and Mapbox Satellite help me with this edit
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/989908342/history

Again, thanks to your comments, I realized that I cannot upload such big edits cause it's hard to validate changesets and contradicts osm wiki recommendations.
http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

If you need more information about this changeset you can write to me in DM and i will help you with that.
laflovver (2021-10-12 12:40:40+00:00): Hello Lee Carré.
I have taken note of your comments. I will try not to make such gross and rookie mistakes in the future.
Lee Carré (2021-10-15 09:53:39+00:00): 🙂👍
kubahahaha (2021-10-05 23:19:35+00:00): highway=living_street to ulica w strefie zamieszkania (znak D-40). Czy na pewno dobrze oznaczyłeś te ulice?
eggie (2021-10-06 08:27:08+00:00): Dag Dannox.. Lijkt mij oke.
Voor gemeentegroen is tegenwoordige een nieuw tag... 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dshrubbery
Bij voorkeur geen vlakken aan de gebouwen vastplakken. 

MVG
eggie
Dannox (2022-04-12 10:32:53+00:00): Oke bedankt. Ik heb de vlakken zojuist losgekoppeld. Kan je nog even controleren of het goed is gegaan?
eggie (2022-04-12 10:38:07+00:00): Het lijkt me oke zo...  De nodes liggen nog wel op elkaar, maar dat is geen bezwaar. 
Groet
eggie
A67-A67 (2021-10-05 16:40:44+00:00): Het was getagd als highway=trunk, motorroad=no. De tag motorroad=no geeft aan dat het inderdaad geen autoweg was. 

De combinatie betekent "Onderbreking in auto(snel)weg". Dat lijkt me correct, aangezien het om de onderbreking in autosnelwegstatus gaat tussen de A59 en A50 zuid (en vice versa).

Zie ook:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:motorroad=no
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging#Auto.28snel.29wegen
A67-A67 (2021-10-11 12:09:09+00:00): Ik heb de oorspronkelijke tagging hersteld.
Frans S (2021-10-05 14:21:10+00:00): You wanted a review here ? 1 building, as far I can see a bit oversized or included 2 buildings
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112124520
AndresDuhour (2023-04-06 11:32:48+00:00): Buen día! quería consultarle por la información para agregar la numeración de las calles. Estoy revisando que los nombres estén unificados con la etiqueta addr:street pero hay diferencias en la numeración que querría revisar. Saludos! Andrés
Allison P (2021-12-07 02:42:45+00:00): Please check name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9148554332. Also check names of businesses. It is likely that a name such as "General store" is just a description and the business is not really called that.
eggie (2021-10-05 14:25:57+00:00): Hi.. You removed all the highwaytags from the road and replaced it by barrier=yes?
Why is that?
You created a block with the highwaytags. Is the road closed temporarely?

Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112125192
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-10-05 14:37:58+00:00): Reverted by changeset  #112126301

Please don't replace the highway by barrier=yes.

There are roadworks at the moment and the Korte ’s-Gravesandestraat will transformed into a cyclestreet.

https://www.amsterdam.nl/projecten/werkzaamheden/overige/sarphatistraat-gravesandeplein-omleiding/

Greetz,
eggie
Joel Amos (2021-11-14 22:01:18+00:00): Remember to be extra careful when splicing ways that are members of routes, as the order of the route members can get jumbled. The iD editor doesn't provide tools for this; JOSM is the way to go in these cases.
Ser9ei (2021-10-05 15:03:36+00:00): Согласно принятому формату корпус ставится через пробел: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112125529
Map-Peter (2022-02-08 16:56:15+00:00): Hallo Xre90,
 
ich habe dort kein "amenity=fast_food" ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food ) gesehen - weder vorm Getränkeland, noch im Getränkeland.
 
Unter der angegebenen Webseite finde ich nur "Lange Straße 9, 17094 Burg Stargard".
 
Ist "Edita" sonst Mo-Fr 11:00-14:00 mit einen "Foodtruck" hier auf dem Parkplatz? Oder wolltest du vielleicht etwas ganz Anderes in diesem Änderungssatz darstellen?
 
Gruß Peter
Xre90 (2022-02-08 19:13:06+00:00): Hallo Peter,

es kann sein, dass dieser Imbiss ein Food-Truck ist. Ich war im Oktober vor Ort und habe dort gegessen.
Die Betreiber meinten auf Nachfrage zu mir, dass sie Montag bis Freitag fix hier sind.
Map-Peter (2022-02-09 21:34:52+00:00): Hallo Xre90,
 
So ein fahrender Imbisswagen hat keine Adresse -> habe ich gerade geändert zu "ref:" + habe "fixme" + "description" + "check_date" geschrieben -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9148646292/history
 
Gruß Peter
A Hall (2021-10-07 14:53:37+00:00): Was this built as a church? It looks strictly residential, so does not meet the requirement as set: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dchurch

Also, unless it is a public place of worship, it should not receive an amenity tag suggesting that. Religious tags should not be used to describe the religion of inhabitants of residential buildings.
Vcarthur (2021-10-07 19:52:11+00:00): I have proof that the homeowner is an ordained certified minister of the Church of the FSM. He has asked to use his home as a place of worship. How should I attach his credentials?
FrankOverman (2021-10-22 20:48:11+00:00): Mag ik vragen of deze aanpassingen gedaan zijn vanuit een survey ter plekke? Ik heb dit gebied een paar maanden geleden aangepakt na een uitgebreide survey ter plekke: changeset 107006532;
ik ben er vandaag weer eens gaan kijken en wil net een wandelpad invoeren en valt me nu op in OSM dat eea niet klopt tov situatie die ik vandaag zag; dus ik loop nu tegen deze changeset aan die erna is aangebracht. Bv deze track heb ik niet gezien ter plekke: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/989971661; ik hoor het graag, voordat ik ga editen.
FrankOverman (2021-10-23 07:51:56+00:00): Wat geschiedenis in deze note:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2729493
eggie (2021-10-23 08:33:31+00:00): PDOK actueel 2019 is verouderd..
Er zijn recentere luchtfoto's.
ortho HR 2021 bv

Daar is inderdaad de track niet meer te zien. .. of het was een tijdelijk iets dat met de aanleg van het gebied te maken had.

https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=23-10-2020&loc=51.51410%2C5.067379%2C17z&marker=loc&acqdate=2021-09-08&acqid=20210908_110640_SV1-04&sensor=SuperView-1&overlay=mos-0


MVG
eggie
GEOIG (2021-10-05 14:33:14+00:00): No Bing!! ESRI imagery.
VigilantPenguin (2022-01-13 07:00:51+00:00): Hi there, what's your source for the speed limit being 10 MPH on Elleray Lane Northeast? I don't see any signage in Mapillary photos so I was assuming it would be the default citywide 20 MPH residential. I'm currently updating speed limits throughout Seattle, so was just wondering.
austinsnow (2022-01-13 16:52:58+00:00): Oh, that's an awesome thing to do. Thanks!

I've surveyed the lane in person, but I don't recall there being a 10 mph sign there either. I'm guessing I erroneously put in a typo when I meant to change it from 25 to 20 mph? I'm on board with switching it to 20 mph.
VigilantPenguin (2022-01-13 18:34:34+00:00): Great, I'll include that in an upcoming changeset for residential speed limits in NE Seattle, thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-10-05 17:10:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
gmar5 (2021-10-06 10:33:08+00:00): Hi. Welcome and thank you for your mapping contributions.
Some of the names tagged here for sport pitches, etc., seem too generic. Unless those are the actual proper names used locally in Wolfson, they are best avoided since the information is already contained in their identifying tags. 
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
eggie (2021-10-05 17:07:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback... Pernis staat al op de kaart als Placenode met zelfs extra info.
Ik haal je vermelding weer weg.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Wilmer Osario (2021-10-05 17:25:03+00:00): Some roads cannot be a ramps (*_link) because there are buildings adhering to it
VigotheCarpathian (2021-10-12 20:23:03+00:00): Hello Wilmer Osario. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will refrain from altering classifications on these ways.
ivanbranco (2021-10-17 13:55:32+00:00): Hi Chris, you added many check:date=* tags instead of using the proper check_date=*, can you fix it?

see: https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22check%3Adate%22%3D*+global&R
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
skorasaurus (2021-10-05 17:19:30+00:00): thanks for adding all of the details and updates to the cemetery! :)
JaniceG (2021-10-19 21:14:58+00:00): Sure - love this cemetery!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
vojtechzaboril (2021-10-05 15:50:19+00:00): Edit: source is "North Rhine-Westphalia aerial photograph" instead of "Metropole Ruhr: Luftbilder (10 cm)"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SK53 (2023-06-14 14:46:40+00:00): Please dont use railway=platform & public_transport=platform. These cause these elements to show up as live passenger platforms which is not helpful. Always stick a lifecycle prefix on these elements.
kreuzschnabel (2021-10-15 08:59:33+00:00): Hi Thingummy, in your edit you made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528465173 an entire bridge. I am pretty sure that’s not what youve had in mind.
Thingummy (2021-10-16 11:59:21+00:00): Thanks for that. Fixed. Fat figures guess.