piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToniE (2016-05-04 14:45:28+00:00): Hi R0bst3r,

Danke für's Korrigieren. Das JOSMs validator "turn:lanes" generell nicht kennt scheinen mir die zusätzlichen "tuurn:lanes" Meldungen vor dem Hochladen durch die Finger gerutscht zu sein.

Gruß,
Toni
MKnight (2016-05-04 18:48:40+00:00): der josm-validator kennt turn:lanes und validiert sie auch. 
um falschschreibungen im tag selbst zu finden musst Du "andere Meldungen" aktivieren.
ToniE (2016-05-05 10:00:44+00:00): Danke für den Tip(p), werde später mal die Settings checken.
GerdP (2017-09-25 12:14:57+00:00): Hi!
You used highway=passing_place on a way here. The area looks more like a highway=rest_area to me. The value passing_place should only be used on nodes. Do you think that this place was created to allow two vehicle to pass each other?
JPERR (2017-09-26 08:12:23+00:00): Hi GerdP,

I can't be 100% sure about the fact this area was meant as a passing place, however the road there is quite narrow, uphill, and there are no other spaces right before or after to stop and let a vehicle pass. 
But I guess it would be OK to mark it as a highway=rest_area as well. 

Best regards,
JL
GerdP (2017-09-26 09:13:24+00:00): My understanding is that you can stop there to access this viewpoint:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4230873933
A rest_area is probably larger. Please review my changes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52378510
JPERR (2017-09-29 21:19:20+00:00): I am fine with your changes. Thanks for the input
Hjart (2016-05-04 20:56:12+00:00): Hej
Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dit bidrag. Jeg har ændret denne her til "cycleway" og angivet at den er asfalteret. Jeg har også markeret barrieren ud mod Slettebjergvej og ført stien helt ud og forbundet den med Slettebjergvej
literan (2016-05-04 14:09:35+00:00): construction=yes означает, что мост полностью закрыт для проезда, это действительно так?
Zmianowy (2016-05-08 08:46:32+00:00): Dzięki temu, że były wyrysowane, przejeżdżając Legnicką, zwróciłem uwagę, że faktycznie, budynki już stoją.
Jeżeli nie mogę poprawić, to nie usuwam, bo lepsze pi razy oko niż wcale.
maraf24 (2016-05-08 09:28:23+00:00): To są budynki w budowie, pojawia się więc tu niedługo i to dokładnie wyrysowane, łącznie z adresami i uliczkami.
Zmianowy (2016-05-08 10:09:47+00:00): Zostały wyrysowane budynki już istniejące (widziałem). Nie ma znaczenia, czy są oddane do użytku (pustostany rysujemy również). Dla mnie ważne jest, żeby zachować w historii pierwszego autora obiektu, czyli poprawić kształty, a nie usuwać całość, żeby potem na to miejsce wprowadzać swoje obiekty. Takie działania nie będą dobrze widziane.
maraf24 (2016-05-08 10:54:15+00:00): OSM to nie jest mapa i jedną z podstawowych zasad jest zgodność z rzeczywistością. Te budynki nie zgadzały się z tym, co jest w terenie.
Autor po prostu odwalił maksymalną fuszerkę.
Nie licz na zachowanie pierwszego autora w OSM - nie jest to praktycznie możliwe, system nie został zaprojektowany pod tym kątem.
Zmianowy (2016-05-08 11:09:33+00:00): Zachowanie pierwszego autora jest jak najbardziej możliwe, przynajmniej w dużej części. Wielu już zachowałem w historii, poświęcając więcej czasu na edycję. Ocena "wyrysowane na oko" jest subiektywna i być może przekonasz się o tym, jak ktoś usunie wyrysowany przez Ciebie obiekt, opisując "usunięcie budynków wyrysowanych na oko". Wystarczy różnica paru metrów.
maraf24 (2016-05-08 11:35:59+00:00): Nie było różnicy paru metrów, przy takich różnicach zostawiam uwagę lub dodaję FIXME=obrys. Jakbyś stale monitorował Wrocław to byś wiedziała, że tak właśnie robię. Usuwam coś bardzo rzadko i te budynki to jest chyba pierwszy przypadek we Wrocławiu. Jako że i tak regularnie dodaję budowy, budyki i adresy to i tak zapewne ja będę aktualizował ten teren. Na podstawie rzetelnych źródeł, a nie na oko.
Jeśli masz gdzieś pod ręką projekt tych budynków lub coś podobnego to mi podrzuć, odrysuję.
Hjart (2016-05-04 19:28:31+00:00): Jeg har ændret fra tertiary til track og justeret til det korrekte forløb udfra hvad jeg kan se på Geodatastyrelsens fotos + Strava data
user_717463 (2016-05-14 21:24:14+00:00): Что это?
Supaplex (2016-05-04 16:35:31+00:00): 這是派出所嗎？
luiswoo (2016-05-04 13:49:54+00:00): DmitryKRR, используйте полдожку mapbox, bing в этом месте устарел. Здание на знание рисовать не нужно тоже.
zarl (2016-08-24 06:30:11+00:00): Hier siehst du sehr schön, warum eine History von bereits eingetragenen Informationen möglichst nicht gelöscht werden sollte: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172556726/history

Bitte sag mir mal, wie du auf die Hausnummer "19 links" kommst. Die History des Gebäudes zeigt, dass du das eingetragen hast. 

Wie, das stammt nicht von dir?

Über Umwege habe ich jetzt herausgefunden, dass https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1834480140/history von dir gelöscht wurde.
30303020 (2017-11-03 20:19:00+00:00): Hey,

kann es sein, dass in der Lindenstr. etwas verrutscht ist? Siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355069113#map=19/52.50564/13.39546
SomeoneElse (2016-05-08 09:56:48+00:00): As I said on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38959528 the day before you added this, the changeset description you've used doesn't explain what you did or why, and the changeset is huge.

Please do use localised changesets, and explain in the description what you changed and why.
Luis36995 (2016-05-10 18:51:59+00:00): I was fixing impossible angles in some streets, you can see the task description in the changeset comment link (http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/admin/kinksminorhighways). And as I answer in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38959528, I'll be careful with this kind of editions. Thanks for your feedback again.
GerdP (2017-08-25 13:49:42+00:00): Hi!
Please review. Is this a mini_roundabout or a junction=roundabout ? See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ajunction%3Droundabout
Papibaquígrafo (2016-05-04 15:29:17+00:00): Obrigado por mapear a escola.

Só um pequeno comentário: a convenção que temos usado é incluir os dados adicinais (nome da escola, endereço, etc) no terreno da escola, e não no prédio, como você fez (isto não está errado, mas não é a forma mais usual – até porque muitas escolas tem mais de um prédio).
Vainer Germann (2016-05-04 23:40:19+00:00): Obrigado pela orientação.
Eu vinha fazendo assim por desconhecer essa convenção, mas a partir de agora incluirei nos terenos ao invés dos prédios.
user_5359 (2016-05-04 17:53:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please tag a building with the key building not with area.
SomeoneElse (2016-05-08 10:04:35+00:00): Hi,
It'd be really helpful if you could give a more descriptive reason for the change other than "Error: self_intersection_ways".  What actually was the way that had a problem (a road? a building? something else?).  What actually was the problem (i.e. explain why an outline of a building that intersects itself or a road that reuses nodes a problem)?

Also, this is a huge changeset - it be much easy for local mappers to see what affects them if it was more geographically localised.  The Welsh end, http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3492463/history , does indeed look like a change that needed making but seems to be nothing to do with self intersections.
Martin2009 (2016-05-08 22:55:55+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the feedback.
The message "self_intersection_ways" from the "OSM Inspector" are in most cases, knots or zigzag in a OSM-way.
Sometime I fix, JOSM-Warnings by the way (like relation/3492463).

In future I will look to make smaller changesets, with better comments.
BeKri (2016-05-05 18:14:17+00:00): Sorry, aber bei dem Blödsinn, den Du seit dem 17. April hier abgeladen hast,
geht Deine Glaubwürdigkeit gegen NULL !
Ohne Nachweisfoto würde ich Dir das nicht abnehmen ...
Was soll das "|Straße|" im Tag name ?
Eine Strasse wird mit highway= service definiert.
Da es ein Ami-Name zu sein scheint, wird da wohl road oder ähnliches stehen, bitte ändere das !
Danke.
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-08 11:56:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40566565 where the changeset comment is: Alle Edits von MonsterStreamer revertiert, da unglaubwürdig und mit gefälschten Beweisbildern untermauert, siehe http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54493&amp;action=new
lyctkel (2021-11-17 21:13:07+00:00): Hi Math1985,
Is Sterrenbos (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4165971311) possibly a double of Sterrenbos (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6315631) and a bit out of place?
Regards,
lyctkel
Math1985 (2021-11-17 22:21:13+00:00): Ja, die hoort daar niet, ik heb hem aangepast!
Achoin (2016-05-05 10:33:20+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы внесли исправления в карту openstreetmap с помощью приложения MAPS.ME.
Уточните пожалуйста, созданный вами объект является всё же банком или банкоматом?
Спасибо за участие.
richlv (2016-05-04 18:12:14+00:00): what is the attraction, created in this changeset ?
ediyes (2016-06-24 16:34:52+00:00): Hola, 

En este cambio tienes muchas calles superpuestas como esta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314268409/history, qué es lo que hiciste?
Achoin (2016-05-05 11:00:33+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы внесли исправления в карту openstreetmap с помощью приложения MAPS.ME.
Уточнение: 1. Магнит на улице Маклакова в Мурманске уже отмечен на карте. Ждите обновления карт.
Госпиталь погранвойск в Петрозаводске - Вы указали номер дома на POI госпиталя, в этом нет необходимости, так как отметка стоит на здании, которое уже имеет адрес. Следовательно при поиске данного объекта вы итак сможете увидеть его адрес.
3. Второй пункт так же касается магазина Магнит - нет необходимости указывать адресную информацю на объекте, находящимся внутри здания, имеющего уже указанный адрес.
Все замечания я исправил. 
Исправления должны появиться при следующем обновлении карты MAPS.ME.
Спасибо за участие.
kayle (2016-05-05 05:43:49+00:00): Ahoj,
jedna otázka. V obci sú už názvy ulíc?
user_5359 (2016-05-11 19:27:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a. Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking , too!
user_5359 (2016-05-15 19:30:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
user_717463 (2016-05-07 07:46:45+00:00): Кафе называется "Парфюм"?
user_5359 (2016-05-15 19:29:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Chetan_Gowda (2016-05-06 10:15:46+00:00): Hi @SanjeevKumarT welcome to OpenStreetMap. I appreciate your mapping and contribution to OSM.  I see many roads/living_streets traced with "access=private"  tags. I don't think they are all privately accessed. Please try to map by referring to India OSM Wiki:  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway. Also feel free to comment on this changeset. I can help with that. :)
SanjeevKumarT (2016-05-06 16:05:30+00:00): Hi Chetan,

Thanks for your feedback about my work. I will correct those mistakes as soon as possible. I have a doubt regarding residential highways and living streets, will you please help me to find out the difference between these two types of roads?
SanjeevKumarT (2016-05-06 19:47:45+00:00): Hi Chetan,

Hope so i have corrected those mistakes. Kindly please review my edits and let me know if there is any errors, so that i can fix them.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-06 12:01:56+00:00): Hello again,
I'm afraid you've missed the "big picture" here again.  The immediate edit prior to yours to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/110068049/history was a newbie one that caused a fair few other problems (including removing lots of names from the South Carolina relation).
It's always worth checking how data that shows up on a QA site got to be how it is and not just taking it at face value.
"Fixing" problems like this that hide problems from QA sites is not helpful; it actually makes it more difficult to fix the real underlying problems in the data.
Best Regards,
Andy
karitotp (2016-08-08 19:21:25+00:00): Hey again Andy!
You are completely right. We should take care about the quality of the data. However, both roads I've edited - Mullinax Circle and the private one - don't have deleted tags by the newbie mapper, but added tags. So I just moved the point that was causing the impossible angle. And thanks for fixing this area.
IIVQ (2016-05-04 20:38:47+00:00): Volgens mij is de "lage" A9 Diemen->Holendrecht nog niet in gebruik; pas donderdag 5 mei om 6:00 gaat deze open.
Владимир К (2016-05-10 06:52:08+00:00): НЕТ! нетльзя ставить в название направление! у tracktype есть совершенно определенные ключи, а не отсебятина на русском через подчеркивания
Alan (2016-05-04 20:50:06+00:00): 🌈
andrewwiseman (2016-05-04 20:50:45+00:00): haha, truly
Seandebasti (2017-12-09 16:50:55+00:00): hey whats africover?
Self-Perfection (2016-05-08 14:51:31+00:00): Добрый день! Вижу это одна из ваших первых правок, так что добро пожаловать в OSM.

Обратите внимание, что пересекающиеся дороги в месте пересечения должны либо иметь общую точку-перекрёсток, что будет обозначать их физическое пересечение в реальном мире, либо одна из них должна быть обозначена как мост/туннель. Просто пересекающие дороги это одна из типичных ошибок начинающих, вообще стоит посмотреть https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Ошибки
JuanVerde (2016-05-04 20:37:58+00:00): Should read "Nicaragua Edits KG Ground Survey 2016"
JuanVerde (2016-05-04 20:37:18+00:00): Should read "Nicaragua Edits KG Ground Survey 2016"
Glassman (2016-05-04 22:23:00+00:00): I don't recall ever seeing a viewpoint at the mall. The mall is already tagged. I'd suggest we delete this tag.
user_5359 (2016-05-15 19:24:49+00:00): done
JuanVerde (2016-05-04 20:36:41+00:00): **Should read "Nicaragua Edits KG Ground Survey 2016"
Владимир К (2016-05-10 06:12:33+00:00): Категории в названиях. повсюду. Всё сношу.
rickmastfan67 (2016-05-04 22:29:18+00:00): Is it possible that you could try to keep these types of changesets limited to one state or even smaller areas? It makes it sometimes impossible for local mappers to double check if your changes are correct since the OSM RSS feeds give any changeset that has a bounding box that enters a smaller area that a user may be watching, even if there aren't any changes done inside said small area. Would make it easier for me to double check my local area when changes are truly done here in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA area. Thanks again! :)
Luis36995 (2016-08-09 13:35:02+00:00): Hi rickmastfan67, yes we are aware of this problem and are looking to fix it. You can track progress here: https://github.com/JOSM/tofix-plugin/issues . Please let me know if you are noticing this again.
Thanks
rickmastfan67 (2016-05-04 22:29:09+00:00): Is it possible that you could try to keep these types of changesets limited to one state or even smaller areas? It makes it sometimes impossible for local mappers to double check if your changes are correct since the OSM RSS feeds give any changeset that has a bounding box that enters a smaller area that a user may be watching, even if there aren't any changes done inside said small area. Would make it easier for me to double check my local area when changes are truly done here in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA area. Thanks again! :)
ridixcr (2016-05-20 16:47:51+00:00): Hey there!

I think it is a mistake that I committed layers,from now onwards not commit.

Thanks for your feed back!
ridixcr (2016-05-20 17:02:06+00:00): Hi rickmastfan67,
I'm not sure how this happened since I'm working with To-Fix Plugin, maybe I could have confused the layers while downloading data manually. I will be careful about my future editions. Thanks for your feedback
rickmastfan67 (2016-05-04 22:31:15+00:00): Is it possible that you could try to keep these types of changesets limited to one continent or even smaller areas? It makes it sometimes impossible for local mappers to double check if your changes are correct since the OSM RSS feeds give any changeset that has a bounding box that enters a smaller area that a user may be watching, even if there aren't any changes done inside said small area. Would make it easier for me to double check my local area when changes are truly done here in the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA area. Thanks again! :)
DannyAiquipa (2016-05-05 12:38:58+00:00): Hey there , I do not know happened exactly , but I will be more careful, Thanks for your comment
Владимир К (2016-05-07 10:42:06+00:00): не нужно в название магазина писать как он работает. продукты это тоже не название магазина. Нужно имя собственное. возможно его вовсе нет. а режим работы круглосуточно обозначается openning_hours=24/7
Владимир К (2016-05-07 10:40:15+00:00): не нужно писать что это конечная остановка
Владимир К (2016-07-06 14:38:24+00:00): убрал это "название"
Владимир К (2017-02-21 07:21:37+00:00): А оно действительно есть, это название?
Alexander-II (2017-02-24 12:28:13+00:00): Думаю, что нет. Никогда таких названий в Москве не встречал. Сделаю откат. Если не прав - поправьте меня.
Alexander-II (2017-02-24 12:31:49+00:00): По ухоженности территории (по снимкам bing) территория больше похожа на leisure=park
Hjart (2016-05-05 07:28:12+00:00): Hej
Jeg har lavet det her lidt om
Peer Sommerlund (2016-05-17 18:16:03+00:00): Hvis jeg kikker på http://www.yournavigation.org/ kan jeg se blokeringen mellem engvej 39 og 41, men den tillader alligevel en bil at passere den. Kan man gøre det på en anden måde?
Hjart (2016-05-17 18:30:01+00:00): OSRM respekterer tydeligvist blokeringen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=55.8925%2C12.5260%3B55.8933%2C12.5337, så måske den der side bare ikke har opdateret deres database (dvs opdateret deres kopi af vores data) siden ændringen?
Hjart (2016-05-17 18:34:02+00:00): Ha, der står endda nederst til venstre på siden: "Routing data from planet file: 2014-09-02." 

Så du skal ikke forvente det bliver bedre der uanset hvad vi gør med vores data.
cserpell (2016-07-29 19:58:18+00:00): Estimado/a, muchas gracias por tu aporte. El nombre de la calle efectivamente es Baden Powell, así que lo corregí en todos lados. Con respecto al punto que agregaste de La Polar, lo eliminé pues está duplicado con la tienda la polar que está al otro lado de la calle. La tienda La Polar está al frente del mall.

Muchas gracias,
Un mapero de Quilpué
Warin61 (2016-07-29 01:51:48+00:00): Hi, 
looks like you have made some changes to the boundaries of the Western Sydney Parklands. There is a conflict in the outer ways sharing the same space. I have moved the southern part of Way: 402801662 and the northern western Way: 402801663. You have added gates to Way: 402801663 ... umm gates usually go with a fence.. and the fence may not follow the leagal park boundaries?  

Looks to my eye that there is a legal easement between these ways(I assume from the LPI base map view). This may not be evident on the ground.

Please look at the area with the LPI base Map view enabled so you can compare what you see on  the ground with what the legal aspects are? 

If what you want to add is a fence line .. then add a new way .. the fence line and legal boundary may not be the same.
5m4u9 (2016-05-05 06:48:14+00:00): oh my dog! thanks :).
manoharuss (2016-07-11 10:01:07+00:00): Hi Arjie'Cindy,
You tagged `tourism=viewpoint` to so many nodes. Even to few streets. These edits are not constructive to OSM if they are not actually viewpoints. You want me to revert this?
Manohar
GerdP (2017-08-23 07:21:14+00:00): Hi!
You changed highway=path to highway="Horse to Horse".
If I got that right you want to map that the ways are no longer usable. I think
abandoned:highway=path should be used for that.
ORMTB TomP (2017-08-26 01:30:26+00:00): Horse to Horse is a mountain bike trail that for the most part does not follow any old roads. It connects the trails near Horse Butte to Horse Ridge roughly paralleling China Hat road. As far as I know it is not an approved trail by the BLM. That area is a wilderness study area. Hopefully you did not erase the trail I created with a pretty good gps. I had no hand in creating the trail.
GerdP (2017-08-26 05:04:19+00:00): I did not delete anything here, but you did something similar by changing them and your comment seems to say that this was intended. So I am not sure now how what you intended to do.
muralito (2016-05-06 02:21:23+00:00): Podes ver las convenciones a usar en http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Argentina
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-05-05 06:50:26+00:00): Автосервис это название остановки или аналог СТО?
rashaurl (2016-05-19 20:00:10+00:00): исправил. это автосервис. Остановка там по-другому называется
luiswoo (2016-05-05 08:43:24+00:00): main1188, желательно, что бы улицы соединялись между собой: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Additional_rules_to_highway_classification
А в JOSM можно наложить слой кадастра https://yadi.sk/i/pF7xLcYwrVj6E не натягивая улицы на глаз.
q_un_go (2016-05-05 09:36:08+00:00): Doch, da ist in etwa die Parkplatzeinfahrt. Kann sein, dass der Parkplatz etwas zu groß ist und die Einfahrt etwas weiter westlich liegt. 
Siehe hier: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SciKw5JfcxwV9qE8e4VwCQ/photo
Alecs01 (2016-05-06 17:24:18+00:00): Ciao, ho ripristinato la situazione precedente, l'Auchan di Cinisello ha chiuso qualche mese fa (in teoria per riaprire in un futuro imprecisato), shop=mall implica che sia attivo, in questi casi per non cancellare del tutto l'oggetto (gli spazi comunque ci sono ancora), l'approccio è di aggiungerci il suffisso disused:, quindi disused:shop=mall
GiorgioL (2016-05-07 14:49:30+00:00): Ciao, perfettamente d'accordo ho esattamente fatto come te anche per altri mall dismessi ("il Dadone" a Como e "Le acciaierie" a Cortenuova) ma per questo avevo tolto l'informazione "disused" proprio perché sapevo che più che dismesso è "sospeso" in attesa di ampliamento e ristrutturazione. Però effettivamente vista l'incertezza sono d'accordo sul rimettere l'informazione "disused". Sono meno d'accordo nell'aggiungere "ex" al toponimo, lascerei il nome originale
Mauro1985 (2016-07-29 16:43:38+00:00): Ciao. A parte che non capisco l'inserire un sacco di attività con il changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39113638 e poi rimuoverle con questo ...

Comunque non è qui il problema. Il problema serio è l'uso (abuso) delle MAIUSCOLE. 

Se cerchi sul wiki, sulla mailing list, ecc ... troverai un sacco di discussioni sull'iniziale di nomi tipo "via" o "piazza" ma di certo sei il primo a scrivere TUTTO IN MAIUSCOLO. Cerca di sistemare. 

Grazie e Buon mapping. 
Se serve una mano chiedi pure.
GiorgioL (2016-08-15 08:23:44+00:00): Ciao, grazie mille del messaggio, per quanto riguarda l'aggiunta e la rimozione è stato un mio errore (sciocco) che ho fatto in Josm (ho cancellato per sbaglio tutte le attività che avevo appena inserito). Per quanto riguarda l'inserimento dell'indirizzo in maiuscolo niente da dire è stata una sciocchezza, vedrò di correggere. grazie ancora.
Сергій Дубик (2016-05-05 20:12:17+00:00): Звів дублікати. В Maps.me додані об’єкти з’являться при наступному оновленні програми чи карт — додані раніше POI на Аквастраді вже є  OSM (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.55156/25.63781&layers=N), не потрібно їх наново додавати.
Владимир К (2016-05-11 06:21:17+00:00): давайте пройдемся по вашим объектам. что такое мельница? просто старинная мельница? тогда точно не historic=castle. Болото точно удаляю, оно уже там обозначено верно. После таких объектов возникает вопрос что вы имели ввиду под родник птицы? это правда родник и так называется? зачем в название водопада добавили название реки? возвращаю старое название.
Anil Basnet (2020-04-21 06:16:33+00:00): very first changeset of mine.
Niru KC (2024-05-29 08:43:26+00:00): Nice to know.