piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Allison P (2021-02-12 18:12:46+00:00): Some of the service roads added have an access of value of "customers`" (notice the backtick `). This is not recognized by most data consumers.  Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
naaitha (2021-02-15 10:51:15+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under changeset #99302199. Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
naaitha.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-30 09:36:41+00:00): You forgot to add a turning restriction.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-30 09:38:47+00:00): The issue here is the tip of the lane add taper from the right extend to the lane drop taper to the left
Kovoschiz (2020-12-30 09:39:22+00:00): So I'm not convinced the right needs to be connected to the left.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-17 21:03:35+00:00): Do not create fake "islands" by having an area fold back upon itself.  Use multipolygon relations.

Areas where this has been done have been cleaned up accordingly.
Texas Special (2021-02-22 13:52:58+00:00): It was https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2245957/history
SaikatM (2021-03-02 12:03:27+00:00): Thank you, yes that is the one.
user_5359 (2020-12-30 17:55:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/node/8272949963: Why did add this shop, if he is closed?
Frans S (2020-12-31 13:13:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please be more accurate with mapping and square the buildings (rectangular) you map
See this document how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
STV87 (2020-12-30 10:44:33+00:00): Hej,
Jeg undre mig over at du tilføjer klubhuset for Syrens Bådelaug igen, efter jeg slettede det i går.. Huset samt bådebroer blev fjernet for flere måneder siden!!
Ligeledes undre det mig, at du ændre kysten tilbage efter jeg havde editeret så den retmæssigt viser de nye forhold efter den nylige kystfremrykning.

Jeg kan se du har brugt QuickOrto 2020, som kilde? - Til din orientering blev disse billeder taget i februar-marts 2020, og er altså over 6 mdr gamle.
Såfremt du ikke indhenter ajourført as-build data hos dem der står for arbejdet. Vil jeg anbefale at du genovervejer dit seneste ændringssæt.

Godt nytår,
DBH.
osmviborg (2020-12-30 11:17:06+00:00): Marker venligst bygninger der er fjernet; men stadig synlige på ortofoto, som 'removed:building yes'. QuickOrto 2020 er fra april.
BCNorwich (2020-12-30 10:42:20+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Features added to OSM must be verifiable, please see :-https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability   
I am wondering how this POI can be verified by a passerby? Can the address/position be ascertained on the ground by folk? The website doesn't give an address. Is the tag addr:housename=c/o Curtis Brown, Haymarket House, 28-29 Haymarket actually the address? If so it should be tagged correctly as an address. Is this a house, flat, shop, office or is the business online only?

Surely it can't all be magic!
Regards Bernard.
impiaaa (2020-12-30 20:26:11+00:00): Just because a crossing is illegal doesn't mean it shouldn't be in OSM. access=no is enough. Removing it entirely means that the map is now inaccurate, and someone is going to add it back anyway.
probell (2020-12-30 20:51:39+00:00): Yes, but, there IS no crossing. There are two trails that end on either side of a railroad track. The track is raised on a bed of rock 1 to 2 meters above the trail on either side.

People climb up and over the railroad tracks, but that is not a crossing. It is an artifact of poor city planning that two trails end on either side of the track that, if there was a crossing, would make a convenient continuous trail. But there is no crossing.
impiaaa (2020-12-30 21:43:11+00:00): But you deleted a service road, which does exist.
probell (2020-12-30 22:29:54+00:00): That is a gravel area used every few years for parking vehicles and temporary storage of railroad ties and other parts for railroad track maintenance projects. It is debatable whether that is a service road or a storage yard. I'm not sure that we need to make that determination.

Since it is not a public space, and there is a real potential for serious public harm by mapping it is a service road, I ask that you please do not add back a service road feature.
impiaaa (2020-12-31 00:31:22+00:00): I don't plan on adding it back, but it's clearly visible in imagery (including the access ramp from the main road), so someone will add it back eventually, and that person might not add "access=no", making it even more dangerous than if you hadn't deleted it.
Minh Nguyen (2020-12-31 00:57:32+00:00): “there is a real potential for serious public harm by mapping it is a service road”

Tagging it access=no should mitigate the potential harm caused by mapping it as a service road. It will prevent any router from using the road, and every renderer indicates access=no to err on the side of caution.

“It is debatable whether that is a service road or a storage yard.”

Perhaps consider tagging it as a highway=track instead of a highway=service (but still add access=no)? That would make it even clearer that it isn’t meant for normal use.

If nothing else, impiaaa is right that sooner or later someone will come and add it back in using aerial imagery without local context, potentially causing exactly the dangerous situation you’re trying to avoid. Whenever this is a possibility, there should be something there, even if it’s only tagged not:highway=service. (But then you’d be saying it isn’t a service road, and the question becomes whether that’s accurate.)
probell (2020-12-31 01:39:00+00:00): How about this idea. Since it is quite wide to be considered a road, and its main use is for storing railroad ties, not pedestrian or vehicle passage, what if we map it as an area there rather than a highway and set access=private? With that, renderers will not draw something there that looks like a path.

See, for the same reason that you expect that somebody might add back a service road segment based on aerial imagery, I am concerned that if we leave a service road there, regardless of its access tag, somebody will connect it across the railroad track based on satellite imagery. If the gravel yard is mapped as an area, future mappers looking at aerial imagery would be less likely to add in a highway.

What do you think?
impiaaa (2020-12-31 02:58:41+00:00): I would think that "noexit=yes" at the end of the road and the path would be enough to discourage editors from connecting it
user_5359 (2021-01-10 18:20:01+00:00): Hello! A lake with facebook and misspelled value for wikidata und wikipedia? Really?
Kovoschiz (2020-12-30 09:58:40+00:00): To me it's preferred to use `crossing=traffic_signals` consistently.
sola29 (2020-12-31 14:11:00+00:00): Erst jetzt in der Karte sehe ich, dass die Bushaltestelle ja schon einen Namen hat. In Street Compleet wurde mir die Aufgabe angezeigt, dass die Bushaltestelle noch keinen Namen hat. Merkwürdig.
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-31 07:50:21+00:00): Hallo GravitySquad,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM. Cool, dass du mitmachst!

Bei einer deiner Änderungen ist mir aufgefallen, dass du (bei diesem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889460933) die Oberfläche ergänzt hast: surface=dirt/gravel

Bei surface ist es eigentlich besser* sich auf einen Wert zu beschränken. Falls das aber nicht möglich ist, dann sollte man ";" verwenden. Also "dirt;gravel". (Vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator). Wäre schön, wenn du das noch korrigieren könntest.

Viele Grüße

* IMO ist es besser, da es für die data consumer einfacher ist, Werte ohne ";" zu verarbeiten. Z. B. wie soll ein Weg mit "dirt;gravel" auf einer Karte dargestellt werden?
ff5722 (2021-01-13 21:41:53+00:00): 请不忘还要开通高速入口
user_7130456 (2021-01-14 00:21:50+00:00): @ff5572 ，成宜开通的时候好像只开了四个收费站，我记得我把四个都改成开通了的。
ff5722 (2021-01-14 09:39:15+00:00): 对不起，你是对的
aharvey (2020-12-30 08:00:41+00:00): That's fine if that's how it's defined in OSM. Technically there is a small section at the north without a cliff, and there is a gap on the east where a road goes up, so mostly surrounded by cliff but not completely.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96647702
Frans S (2020-12-31 15:33:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About your mappings, Your mappings are not accurate enough and not squared.

On attached document you find more info about correct mapping and how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
aharvey (2020-12-30 08:02:04+00:00): Looks good on the tramway, just a few nodes in the city look dragged when maybe shouldn't have been?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96648418
GriffinRails (2020-12-30 08:04:48+00:00): Correct, I was just looking around and forgot that I hadn't saved it. I only noticed one that was REALLY misshapen.
radiotrefoil (2020-12-30 09:54:50+00:00): Thanks, definitely an improvement. I'll do any further refining on a smaller scale in future.
Warin61 (2020-12-30 22:23:33+00:00): No. Do large scale if you want.. but try not to reduce the detail. 
The Great Western Highway could be represented with 2 nodes, one at the start and another at the finish and a simple straight line between the two nodes. It would be there in its simplest form while the least amount of noise. But it would be useless for navigation ... OSM should contain the detail, but not the noise ... and that is the fuzziness of the real world. 

Good luck.
Arun Madhavan (2020-12-30 10:06:05+00:00): Hi Divin, the school is already mapped. You need not add the point
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96648644
Dacc1 (2020-12-30 07:49:24+00:00): I used Bing aerial imagery instead of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)
FajrAl (2026-06-27 15:40:22+00:00): Selamat, suntingan Anda satu ini membuat banyak pengendara kesasar. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5135430
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
UNGSC-cronoser (2024-01-30 14:32:01+00:00): Hello; I have found 3 villages very near in the coordinates (-1.2272613, 29.7368419), the 3 villages are in a 30 meters radius.
- Rubona https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8273212833/history#map=19/-1.22707/29.73699&layers=N
- Kisagara  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8273212834/history#map=19/-1.22726/29.73684&layers=N
- Mulehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8273212835/history#map=19/-1.22741/29.73660&layers=N
Could you verify the ubication of them?
Best regards
sewesew (2020-12-30 08:29:29+00:00): (...) Chodzi mi głównie o zamianę unclassified/residental/primary.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-30 11:38:42+00:00): Gratulacje, właśnie miałem go zaznaczyć jako otwarty :)

Dzięki za aktualizację!
osmviborg (2020-12-30 09:05:07+00:00): "A roundabout should only be tagged with name=* if the junction itself is named independently and differently from the roads crossing it". Gælder det ikke i Svendborg?
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-30 11:42:41+00:00): Hi Kaede Akamatsu, welcome to OSM.

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

Your changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=96651518#16/42.7202/-83.4202

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-31 07:52:11+00:00): Hallo irlspam,

bei einer deiner Änderungen ist mir aufgefallen, dass du (bei diesem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/890050304) die Oberfläche ergänzt hast: surface=dirt/sand

Bei surface ist es eigentlich besser* sich auf einen Wert zu beschränken. Falls das aber nicht möglich ist, dann sollte man ";" verwenden. Also "dirt;sand". (Vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator). Wäre schön, wenn du das noch korrigieren könntest.

Viele Grüße

* IMO ist es besser, da es für die data consumer einfacher ist, Werte ohne ";" zu verarbeiten. Z. B. wie soll ein Weg mit "dirt/sand" auf einer Karte dargestellt werden?
irlspam (2020-12-31 11:03:10+00:00): Hi,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe es auf `sand` geändert. Das sollte dort auch passen weil es die gleiche Oberfläche hat, wie die anliegenden Wege.

mfg
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-31 15:55:14+00:00): Vielen Dank :-)
mueschel (2020-12-30 17:37:17+00:00): Hi,
you're using many tags here that are not used by anybody else.
Please use only tags that are described in the OSM Wiki or are available in the presets of your editor.
This is necessary to make sure that every other user can understand the data.

Jan
marc__marc (2021-02-05 11:06:36+00:00): Hello,
And also take take about validator warning, for ex josm warn that amenity=hotel is not used anymore and fix it with tourism=hotel
Regards,
Marc
Amegaz (2021-01-01 22:01:55+00:00): Hi,
Was ist mit way 890050857? Der steht so in der Landschaft. Ist mit nichts verbunden. Kann das sein?
Viele Grüße 
Amegaz
dvdhoven (2020-12-30 09:53:43+00:00): With ID you cannot work on routes.
All routes must be sorted in the durection of the route.
If you cut a road with ID most of the time the sort order of routes running on that way are disrupted.
Further on, if you add roads to a route ID always put them on the end of the route and that is mostly not the place where you want that they shall be.
Only with JOSM you can work with routes.
With JOSM you can play with routes, put road on any place just you like.
In ID you cannnot give roads the roles forward/backward what is necessary for bicycle routes running on one-way roads,
I noiw have repaired two rcn routes and Grafschafter Fietsentour 16 and 17
Yesterday I also repaired an rcn route and Graftschafter Fietsentour 13

Regards,
Dick van den Hoven
H-GT (2021-01-16 14:19:22+00:00): Thank you for the critical annotations and hints.
When I modified bicycle routes, I always checked them with OSM Relation Analyzer. When that program found no fault, I thought the route was correct.
This seems not to be so. Even when I fetch  a route as GPX file and visualise it with ShowGPX it looks very strange.
I am sorry to have spoiled some routes.
When ID is not apt to work on routes, developers should make it fir for that purpose or remove that feature from ID.
As I dislike JOSM, I shall no longer work on routes.
Thank you for repairing some routes.
H-GT
dvdhoven (2021-01-17 12:42:25+00:00): I have checked all the routes of Grafschafter Fietsentour and repaired those with errors.

Regards,
Dick van den Hoven
user_5359 (2020-12-30 17:52:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
eggie (2020-12-30 11:00:13+00:00): Dag Justice,
Let op.. dit onderdeel niet gebruiken bij oneway=yes

Issue Add whether there are cycleways
https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/2310

MVG,
eggie
Arun Madhavan (2020-12-30 09:51:16+00:00): Thanks for contributing. The shape may be improved.  You can try using the Q key to orthogonalise the buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96654701
Frans S (2020-12-31 12:24:23+00:00): omment from Frans S less than a minute ago

Hello. We welcome you as an new mapper.
Please read attached document how to improve your mapping quality.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing

Your mappings are sometimes inaccurate and not squared.
Best regards and keep mapping
Stalker61 (2021-09-11 05:29:10+00:00): Ломать пальцы надо за такое.
itineris (2021-01-08 20:04:33+00:00): Szia!

Ez a fix nem annyira sikerült, mert most a kontúr önmetsző. A kis tanya része a lakott területnek?

Üdv:
Ákos
ovruni (2020-12-30 19:30:35+00:00): Hello, thank you for contributing to OSM. I have noticed that in your changesets you have added street and names in Piura, however these names in addition to having an English prefix are different from those in the INEI database. Can you indicate the source of this data you have used? If you have any questions about the mapping in Peru, you can do so through the telegram channel https://t.me/osmpe or the mailing list of the OSM community in Peru https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
joost schouppe (2021-04-05 16:09:20+00:00): De website van deze markt bestaat nog altijd. Mag ik gokken dat de markt tijdelijk gesloten is wegens covid? Dan kan je misschien beter opening_hours:covid19 gebruiken om dat aan te geven
mjans (2021-04-05 17:04:06+00:00): Definitief gesloten :

https://www.vrt.be/vrtnws/nl/2020/12/29/einde-zwarte-markt-in-tessenderlo/

https://www.hbvl.be/cnt/dmf20201229_96144900
Jakka (2021-04-05 18:26:12+00:00): Verwijderd. Servers moeten nog verwerken (CTRL+F5) helt soms
mueschel (2020-12-30 13:17:56+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of "place_village"? This key is not used in any other place.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-30 10:23:52+00:00): Dlaczego skasowałeś https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8270661123/history zamiast https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8268561185 ?

Kasuj to co wadliwie dodałeś a nie to co było poprawne.
Kosu77 (2021-01-03 14:56:25+00:00): Przecież te węzły były identycznie otagowane więc co to za różnica który wykasuję?
cytat:
"Kasuj to co wadliwie dodałeś a nie to co było poprawne."
Czyli Twój też był wadliwy bo były identyczne? :-)
Wykasowałem ten który mi się pierwszy złapał myszką i nie ma znaczenia czyj on był.
Pozdrawiam
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-05 12:05:25+00:00): > Przecież te węzły były identycznie otagowane więc co to za różnica który wykasuję? 

Łatwiej sprawdzić co się dzieje. Porównaj sytuacje

1) Kosu77 importuje 100 00 adresów, kasuje 50 000 z tego co zimportował - źle zrobiony import, irytujące ale wiadomo co się dzieje

2) Kosu77 importuje 100 000 adresów, kasuje 49 000 adresów które zaimportował oraz 1 000 innych adresów. Teraz dochodzi problem że mogły zostać skasowane adresy które nie zostały dodane i trzeba teraz sprawdzić czy w wyniku tych edycji nie doszło do zniszczeń. Ponadto, utrudnia to wycofanie importu.
eggie (2020-12-30 10:39:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Adressen en Gebouwen voegen we niet zelf toe in OSM. Dat gebeurt periodiek door import. Je kunt dat versnellen door een verzoek te doen op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.

MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-12-30 10:45:27+00:00): Even als voorbeeld hoe zoiets gaat een verzoek op het OSM forum gedaan
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=813258#p813258
MVG,
eggie
osm_wwbr (2020-12-30 10:50:38+00:00): Bedankt.
AndyB_66 (2020-12-30 21:18:10+00:00): Cześć,

Jeżeli chcesz mapować S19, to masz do dyspozycji skalibrowane mapy do celów projektowych z koncepcji programowych dla odcinków Lublin-Kraśnik (https://mapwarper.net/layers/1328) i Kraśnik-Łążek (https://mapwarper.net/layers/1337). W pierwszej części mam jeszcze do precyzyjniejszej rekalibracji odcinek od Lublina do węzła Niedrzwica (pewnie jutro-pojutrze skończę). Na odcinku na południe od Kraśnika są pewne zmiany w PB, w stosunku do KP (oprócz rezerwy na trzeci pas na zewnątrz, a nie wewnątrz, podobnie, jak dla odcinka Lublin-Kraśnik), np. inny przebieg starej DK19 od Pikul do Łążka, na węźle Modliborzyce pojawiły się ronda, zamiast WS-17 w km 16+372 jest WD-17 w km 15+638. Dodałem mapy węzła Łążek i okolic WS-27 ze stron nadzoru.

Pozdrowienia - Andrzej
user_2066394 (2020-12-30 16:21:31+00:00): Format Öffnungszeiten:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
ottwiz (2020-12-30 10:56:06+00:00): Note that i had to shift Maxar for a bit(like 4 meters to match the GPS tracks a bit there) for mapping US 250, but otherwise i used unshifted imagery.
frosm (2021-01-05 23:52:24+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
vous avez ajouté un objet avec un nom mais sans attribut renseignant ce que c'est (le bureau d'une entreprise ?)
par ailleurs, n'hésitez pas à placer correctement l'objet, j'espère que vous ne travaillez pas sur le trottoir :)
j'ai fais une première amélioration, à vous de voir et compléter.
Bonne continuation
*Martin* (2021-04-13 13:54:48+00:00): Prosím opravte diakritiku v "Dolné plucne".
user_2066394 (2020-12-30 16:22:11+00:00): Da würde vermutlich eine Fläche mehr Sinn machen.
Alecs01 (2020-12-30 11:03:13+00:00): Ciao Simone, come ti è già stato scritto, per convenzione in OSM "Via" si scrive con l'iniziale maiuscola, vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade
tux67 (2020-12-30 13:35:22+00:00): Hi,
die Vollständigkeit der Adressen in der Umgebung (MG,HS, etc.) halte ich üblichweise mit diesem Tool: https://regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/auswertung_anzeigen?job_ids=1872&ausgabefarbig=true&linktyp=osmkartevoll&unterdrueckfertigestrassen=nein&unterdrueckspalten=nein&land=Bundesrepublik+Deutschland&stadt=M%C3%B6nchengladbach
Mit dem Schwenk von Einzeladressen auf Addressinterpolation wird das an solchen Stellen leider um einiges schwerer. Vor deinem Change waren hier noch 100% Abdeckung, jetzt fehlen 4 Nummern (die 20 ist neu).
Es wäre gut, wenn du Interpolationen die über 2 Hausnummern hinausgehen (darunter ist eine Interpolation ohnehin obsolet) in der hier vorher verwendeten Notation lassen/dokumentieren könntest. Sonst wird der nächste Durchlauf (wenn Dietmar neue Adressdaten geladen hat) unnötig erschwert.
Gruß und guten Rutsch 
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96661168
jimmyhendrix (2020-12-30 13:46:32+00:00): Hi,
ich schreibe dir gleich eine Nachricht.
Shaun das Schaf (2020-12-30 11:55:10+00:00): Hallo Jerome,

was heißt "kann nicht befahren werden"? 

Ist es physisch nicht möglich? Ist es nur für Fahrräder verboten aber für Fußgänger nicht?

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
JeromeMolnar (2020-12-30 16:08:03+00:00): Hallo Shaun

Sorry hatte mich zu sehr auf das Radfahren bezogen. Die wege die ich makiert habe sind nicht mehr vorhanden, da der Tagebau weiter in diese Richtung gezogen ist. 

Soll heißen ist Physisch nicht möglich 

Grüße Jérôme
Shaun das Schaf (2020-12-30 19:40:02+00:00): Hallo Jérôme,

gar nicht mehr vorhandene Wege können entweder gelöscht werden, oder, sofern sie noch auf manchen Luftbildern sichtbar sind, das "highway=track" durch "razed:highway=track" ersetzt werden. Bei vorhandenen, aber gesperrten Wegen kannst du statt "bicycle=no" auch "access=no" setzen, sofern der Zugang nicht nur für Fahrräder, sondern für alle verboten ist.

Du kannst auch gerne mal versuchen, die Fläche des Tagebaus auf die tatsächlich verwendete Fläche zu vergrößern.

Wenn du Fragen hast oder Hilfe benötigst, nur zu. Aber du scheinst lokales Wissen zu haben, welches nicht direkt von den Luftbildern ersichtlich ist, deshalb solltest du diese Änderungen vornehmen.

Versuch dich gerne mal dran. Solange das "Bearbeitungen prüfen"-Häkchen gesetzt ist, werden die Änderungen nochmal von anderen Nutzern überprüft und wenn Fehler passieren, ist das nicht weiter schlimm.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf