piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-10-02 08:41:56+00:00): Hi mjgk. unfortunately the structure of data exchange in open streetmap is not such that we can see all correspondence between mappers/validators. Thanks for this post.
If you look at the data exchange in the Task manager you will see javbw's comment: quote:
While is it obvious how to map the main roads, there are minor roads along canals/rivers and the ......" 4 weeks ago. This does not negate the kind of qualification given to a road.
Martien's post is a bit short as far as I am concerned. 
Kind regards
Frans
Adam_Piszczek (2022-10-30 23:02:29+00:00): Czemu nie Wyzwolenia,Jesienna,Jałowcowa,Długa i do Pańskiej w sam raz. W Luszowicach ok.
VA00 (2022-10-31 04:35:05+00:00): Bo to już Jaworzno..
Adam_Piszczek (2022-10-31 14:47:49+00:00): No tak,ok ale dla mnie lepsza ta opcja.
VA00 (2022-11-01 08:15:18+00:00): Wczoraj objechałem to co już jest na nowo oznakowane, czyli na północ od A4: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2260841
pza (2022-10-13 11:11:45+00:00): I'm also reverting this, as it also appears to be based off old satellite data, and is effectively rolling back other changes which have recently been made based on surveys. Please don't do changes in this area based off satellite data as it's well out of date and being actively maintained by mappers surveying on the ground.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-10-18 07:39:44+00:00): Hi, sorry most of this edit was based on a survey around the Lilyfield lightrail depot. I saw two large structures from the A4, which I assumed were the temporary roofs visible in bing aerial imagery. that was my mistake, i'll be more careful in the future...
pza (2022-10-18 07:46:34+00:00): The bit around the lightrail wasn't a problem, but I didn't have time to careful split out the bits to revert.  I needed to revert it quickly due to the big incorrect change near Victoria Rd.  That's the area which is very misleading on any imagery. The three big "tunnelling sheds" are now demolished.  What you saw was probably the new operations centre which is currently being built between the light rail depot and the tunnel entrance.
abakus_uploader (2022-09-29 22:31:23+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Nearby0051 (2022-09-30 14:45:45+00:00): Hi,
Du hast den Tag "healthcare=psychotherapist" entfernt
Dadurch, dass der ausschlaggebende Tag fehlt wird dieses Objekt nur noch als Adresse angezeigt, jedoch nicht mehr als Praxis.
Sofern der ehemalige Name nicht mehr stimmt da die Bezeichnung rechtlich nicht zulässig ist, solltest du dir bestenfalls einen passenderen Tag hier aussuchen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:healthcare
Wenn du mir kurz Rückmeldung gibst welcher Wert am besten passt, dann trage ich das auch gern um

Zudem ist
"healthcare:speciality 	tiefenpsychologisch_fundierte_methoden;hypnosetherapie;stressbewältigung;burn_out;ängste;depressionen"
vermutlich nicht ganz richtig, da generell immer englische Werte festgelegt werden.
Eine Liste mit geläufigen Werten findet man hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:healthcare:speciality

Bestenfalls selbst korrigieren, sonst mache ich das gern nach kurzer Rückmeldung
Beste Grüße
Linnow (2022-10-01 14:13:06+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Hinweise. Die Korrekturen habe ich gemacht.
Mit herzlichen Grüßen
osmviborg (2022-09-29 11:27:25+00:00): Stien var jo netop markeret som privat, så hvorfor slette den?
MxxCon (2022-09-30 02:52:53+00:00): Hello.
Please note that as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland traffic_calming=island is intended only for traffic calming feature, not pedestrian refuge area.
What you are looking for is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126773307
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:51:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126773736
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
user_1566574 (2022-10-16 12:16:15+00:00): Salut !
Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4231604660/, je comprends l'usage de contact:, à l'exception des cas pour email phone et website où la proposition d'abandon des clés "x=x" en faveur de "contact:x=x " a été rejetée, donc… Pourquoi ce changement ?

Merci !
AmiFritz (2022-10-17 11:07:14+00:00): Salut, J'ai regardé sur le wiki et je n'ai rien vu dans le sens du rejet. C'est dommage car on pourrait regrouper toutes les infos concernant un poi sous contact:*. Une carte de visite en quelque sorte. Je n'ai rien lu au niveau du wiki. Que faire ?
user_1566574 (2022-10-17 14:40:41+00:00): Salut !
C'est ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Discussions/tagging/contact:phone_or_phone

C'est vrai, ça a du bon & du moins bon, je suis d'accord avec toi, mais je te laisse lire les arguments des votants.

En ce qui me concerne je vais m'aligner sur le résultat du choix de la communauté, c'est à dire restaurer les clés phone website & email, pour les autres je n'ai rien à dire c'est top !
Dis-moi ce que tu en penses ? On annule ?
AmiFritz (2022-10-17 18:13:17+00:00): Salut,
En relisant bien la discussion, et si j'ai bien compris, c'est la proposition de déprécier contact:phone qui a été rejetée. Donc on ne touche à rien et on continue allègrement ...
À ton avis ?
user_1566574 (2022-10-17 18:39:55+00:00): En effet, là-dessus j'avoue que m'a mémoire m'a jouée des tours et que dès que j'ai retrouvé la page je l'ai collé sans trop la relire...
phone=* est la clé historique, aussi la plus prise en charge par les applications, là où comme tu disais contact:phone est plus cohérent.

Du coup, j'ai rien à dire, c'est un peu "comme les contributeurs veulent", je touche à rien. Maintenant ça me pose une colle, soit préférer contact:phone, soit phone...

Du coup, c'était mon erreur, désolé, et merci pour cet échange et tes contributions !
AmiFritz (2022-10-17 19:00:16+00:00): Je pars du principe qu'un n° de téléphone est lié à un POI (ex : commerce) donc un contact:* et non à une adresse. Je considère qu'une adresse (addr:*) est unique, mais qu'une adresse peut avoir plusieurs contacts( contact:*). Pour info, 
j'utilise exclusivement la relation associatedStreet pour les adresses d'une même rue et j'ajoute contact:* pour les POI (commerces, etc)
user_1566574 (2022-10-17 20:34:00+00:00): Bon principes !
> Je considère qu'une adresse (addr:*) est unique, mais qu'une adresse peut avoir plusieurs contacts( contact:*).
Càd, plusieurs POI avec chacun des contact:, c'est ça ?

Pour le reste je suis pleinement d'accord avec ces principes ! Auparavant j'utilisais la clé addr: aussi sur les POI (car éditeurs comme Wiki nous y poussaient), mais depuis plusieurs mois j'ai arrêté, et là il faudrait que je me mette à contact:.

Pour associatedStreet, très bien ! Je l'utilise très peu car ça divise les contributeurs, même si je suis largement pour. Je préfère me concentrer sur d'autres thématiques que sur quelque chose qui peut être (dé)fait en mass edit.

Merci de ces explications en tout cas, limpides et carrées !
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-17 16:20:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10060590808 - is there a second waterfall here, or is it place where you look at waterfall mapped a bit to West?
Adam Mościcki (2024-01-23 13:27:13+00:00): there is one waterfall. this is a place-viewpoint
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-23 14:12:48+00:00): retagged it as a viewpoint then, thanks for a reply!
pza (2022-10-11 07:30:24+00:00): I'm reverting this as I guess the source is old satellite imagery. There were major road changes here a few weeks ago. See 125920421, 125337580. This whole area is regularly changing so you shouldn't rely on any satellite imagery.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Brummelwuff (2022-09-30 16:04:08+00:00): Hallo das Hotel Conti ist schon im Gebäude erfasst
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
MFlamm (2022-10-10 15:30:06+00:00): Unfortunately, your edit degraded the map of the Sentier du Cossy. A new pedestrian highway has been built along the train track and was opened in june 2021 (maybe a look at the start_date tag that you deleted should have brought you to be a bit more cautious?).
When you edit in places you don't know personally, please check object histories in the future ;-) 
Sources: Look at the newer Maxar imagery and here:
https://www.nyon.ch/actualites/entierement-reamenage-le-sentier-du-cossy-rouvre-aux-pietons-mais-aussi-aux-cyclistes-9509
habi (2022-10-26 19:50:38+00:00): Sorry for the late reply, the email slipped through some cracks...

I didn't want to degrade the map, only to 'help with routing'.
Thanks for reviewing my changes and making them better with your local knowledge!
habi (2022-09-30 21:04:29+00:00): Ciao Hans HB9FIX

Hallo und Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, schön machst du hier mit!

Bei deinem ersten Änderunngssatz hast du die Daten vom Atelier Regenbogen mit deiner Funk-Lizenznummer (?) und deiner privaten Telefonnummer überschrieben.
Wenn das Atelier Regenbogen noch existiert, dann ist das leider völlig falsch, auch weil wir in OpenStreetMap versuchen, keine persönlichen Daten einzutragen, nur Daten/Telefonnummern von Geschäften...
Wolltest du evtl. deine Antennenanlage eintragen?
Dann wäre das anhand dieser Vorlage etwas besser gelöst: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dantenna
(Suche mal dort nach 'Amateurfunk').
Wenn das Atelier Regenbogen noch existiert (qonach es aussieht, wenn ich https://regenbogen-belp.ch anschaue), würde ich gerne deine Änderung rückgängig machen, und dann kannst du versuchen, deine Antennenanlage nochmals einzutragen, wenn du willst.

E Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Langlaeufer (2022-09-29 14:22:31+00:00): Hi Step,
wenn du Fußwege separat einzeichnest, dann bitte auch alle Querungsmöglichkeiten an den Kreuzungen einzeichnen und das sidewalk auf der Straße aktualisieren. 
Grüße Frank
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126775217
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Langlaeufer (2022-09-29 14:19:16+00:00): Beim Feldweg ist das Grundproblem access=agricultural. Das ist höchst wahrscheinlich falsch, weil damit auch Fußgänger ausgesperrt sind. Vermutlich wäre vehicle oder motor_vehicle=aggricultural richtig. bei letzterem bräuchte es dann auch kein bicycle=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126775328
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 08:38:19+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126799287

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Max-Kritic (2022-09-29 12:34:15+00:00): j'ai pas fini les corrections. J'ai le plan de l'aménagement.