piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2015-09-25 15:24:07+00:00): В Веспуччи есть сервер смещений!?? Что ж, надо будет к нему присмотреться. Вы уж не обижайтесь на вопросы, просто я вижу, что вы новичок, судя по кол-ву правок, а новички часто, не разобравшись, сдвигают целые районы, не зная о смещениях.
ezgis504 (2015-09-25 16:55:33+00:00): *** meant to say is "now considered part of Mardi Gras Pass"  ***
user_599436 (2015-09-25 11:56:27+00:00): Hi, Frederick. I'm a local mapper along with DTHG. It's great to see your improvements to the map.

Is this feature a soccer field? If so, the tag leisure=pitch is used to describe the playing surface (soccer field, tennis court, etc) while leisure=park is used to describe the encompassing facility, if any.

Here's the wiki page describing pitch:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
and park https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park?uselang=en-US

and a local example:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157457551

As you can see, the park boundary is tagged with leisure=park and the sports fields with leisure=pitch.

Feel free to ask DTHG or I a question if you would like, but most everything can be found in the OSM wiki.

Happy mapping,

zeromap
FrederickRelyea (2015-09-25 12:57:39+00:00): Hi Zeromap, thanks for the pointers!  I noticed my edit was looking different than other parks, and you saved me the time into drilling into the reason.  I have updated the map, things should be better now!  Thanks much!

Frederick
user_599436 (2015-09-25 13:20:12+00:00): Looks good! The map gets refreshed pretty quickly so it's easy to see the results of your edits and change them if necessary.
luschi (2015-09-28 16:14:55+00:00): Bitte Parkplätze nicht mit Adressen erfassen. Egal zu welchem Haus sie gehören.
Nur Gebäude haben Adressen.
Geändert in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34307496
Rub21 (2015-09-24 21:32:01+00:00): Test, podría responder este mensaje ni bien lo reciba.
Gracias.
karitotp (2015-09-24 21:45:46+00:00): Recibido :)
mapper999 (2015-09-25 17:38:15+00:00): Bist du dir sicher, dass dieses Zs 3 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2308741240) Kennziffer 10 anzeigen kann? Nach meinen Beobachtungen sind die Weichen in Graben-Neudorf alle entweder auf 80, 60, 50 oder 40 ausgelegt.
Markus K (2015-09-26 10:31:44+00:00): Hallo,
das ist ein Fehler von mir, ich werde das nächste Woche korrigieren, ich habe in diesem Bereich noch mehr Änderungen die ich mappen will.
Gruß Markus
PiNoHo (2015-09-24 21:13:32+00:00): Natuur en vogelbroedgebied
Rub21 (2015-09-24 21:31:39+00:00): Test, podría responder este mensaje ni bien lo reciba.
Gracias.
RichRico (2015-09-24 21:49:48+00:00): ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Rub21 (2015-09-24 21:30:50+00:00): Test, podría responder este mensaje ni bien lo reciba.
Gracias.
Luis36995 (2015-09-24 21:34:19+00:00): Hola
Rub21 (2015-09-24 21:32:50+00:00): Test, podría responder este mensaje ni bien lo reciba.
Gracias.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
Rub21 (2015-09-24 21:30:26+00:00): Test, podría responder este mensaje ni bien lo reciba.
Gracias.
DannyAiquipa (2015-09-24 21:34:58+00:00): ya :)
Rub21 (2015-09-24 21:33:12+00:00): Test, podría responder este mensaje ni bien lo reciba.
Gracias.
ediyes (2015-09-24 21:45:52+00:00): hola, gracias por el comentario
Rub21 (2015-09-24 21:32:25+00:00): Test, podría responder este mensaje ni bien lo reciba.
Gracias.
calfarome (2015-09-24 21:52:20+00:00): Hola  Rub21, en que lo puedo ayudar.
PhilJSmith67 (2015-09-24 22:02:23+00:00): Added entrance ramp from westbound Stuenkel Road to northbound I-57.  Modified entrance ramp from eastbound Stuenkel Road to northbound I-57 to be accessible only from eastbound direction (not a "T" intersection).
muralito (2015-10-06 12:02:13+00:00): Hola Juan, el cambio que hiciste vuelto atras porque la autovia no es "motorway" segun la convencion que tenemos.
El motorway es para autopistas que efectivamente lo son por sus caracteristicas, no porque el responsable politico de turno asi la quiera llamar.
Saludos,
M.
skorasaurus (2015-09-26 21:57:26+00:00): 
Hi, thanks for editing but OpenStreetMap data is what matches currently on the ground. 

I had deleted the ways within several months ago when construction started since they've been removed and not accessible to the public. I'll be undoing your changes (called 'reverting your changeset' in a few minutes.
Øukasz (2017-08-04 21:53:27+00:00): wow that's a lot of edits for the first changset
Nearby0051 (2021-12-16 13:24:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2972826
Vielleicht von Interesse
(6 Jahre später)
rickmastfan67 (2015-09-25 08:49:00+00:00): Seriously, how many times do i have to mention to you that a single interchange on a section of highway doesn't mean that it's a motorway?  I mentioned this in Changeset 33674410 (where you didn't respond) when you did that along US-220 Alternate near State College a 2nd time after I fixed that area because you broke routing.  Now you've done it here along PA-51 ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34237498#map=15/40.6170/-80.2412 ).  Don't you realize you're breaking routing by doing this, especially for Bicycles??  When you falsely upgrade a highway to 'motorway', bicycle routing is broken because it's automatically assumed as 'bicycle=no' on that type of highway.  If you look at the cycle map layer, you can clearly see that here on PA-51 (as well as on US-220 Alternate from that other changeset), both of them are major Bike PA routes.
rickmastfan67 (2015-09-25 09:17:30+00:00): Also, please stop adding the PennDOT quadrant routes into the ref tags ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11733339 ).  The US community agreed that they shouldn't be in the ref tag and should be added to 'ref:penndot=SR ****' instead. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pennsylvania/State_Route_Relations#Four_digit_routes  They are not signed like the 'keystone' routes which are numbered between 3-999, and thus, don't deserve to be in the ref tag, as that's for 'signed routes'.  I did invite you SEVERAL times via PM back in January '15 (all the way till March '15) to join talk-us when we were talking about the quadrant routes so that you could explain why you thought they should be added in the ref tag since I knew you were adding the quadrant routes in the ref tags before then.  However, you didn't, even after you said you would (several times).
rickmastfan67 (2015-09-25 09:30:49+00:00): Also, what's up with the downgrading of some of the highways in this changeset (like Arlington Ave from primary to secondary between PA-837 and the Liberty Bridge)? That is a major highway connection there for traffic, and justifies the primary tag between those two roads.

Also, what's up with the traffic lights you added here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34237498#map=19/40.51800/-80.13079 There have never been lights there (as long as I've been alive).  That's all stop sign controlled.  I would understand a mistake here if there were shadows from what looked to be lights overtop of the highway, but there isn't such shadows in Bing.
rickmastfan67 (2015-09-25 09:34:55+00:00): Anyways, in closing, I would recommend a surgical revert here.  Leaving the good stuff, like a few alignment fixes you did and layer fixes, but undoing the motorway upgrades and other stuff I mentioned above.  Please get back to me on this.  I'm more that willing to do the revert process, but I would love a response back first just to know we're on the same page before doing it.
rickmastfan67 (2015-10-01 01:37:10+00:00): Well, I waited over 6 days for a response back from Matt1993, got nothing here.  Had to act on the surgical revert before too many conflicts arose making it hard to do.  Meanwhile he's still been editing in OSM during the time between the comments left here, so he's had time to leave a comment here...... Surgical revert has been done in Changeset 34358905. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34358905
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:23:09+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372292527
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:05:01+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60801573
5m4u9 (2015-09-26 06:24:43+00:00): Hola, gracias por añadir info en OSM.

Recuerda que debes seleccionar una categoría al añadir un elemento (punto, vía, área)... esta categoría da sentido o la describe. en este caso una tienda :).

Si tienes dudas pregunta...
Supaplex (2015-09-25 12:14:56+00:00): 這些應該是空地吧？不應該標建築
而是highway=pedestrian area=yes
pshsieh (2015-09-25 14:18:18+00:00): 嗯 是空地，因為想測試一下在地圖上能不能顯示出來，如果是區域好像就不會顯示。
想請問一下有沒有辦法讓空地在地圖上顯示出來呢>< 
謝謝
Supaplex (2015-09-29 09:53:53+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34321128
可以參照上面我的標法
不過有些看起來是停車場
宜用停車場去標示
maraf24 (2015-09-25 08:29:15+00:00): Kłamstwo. rowers2 dostał odpowiedź, a droga nadal była zamknięta dla samochodów.
Dodatkowo błędnie ją teraz oznaczył, bo teraz nie jest przejezdna dla np. skuterów.
maraf24 (2015-09-25 17:17:21+00:00): Ty to masz pecha.
Niestety, ale zrobiłem zdjęcie, więc wycofuję ten twój bollard na drodze i przywracam mój twoje "poprawki".
Oto zdjęcie: http://postimg.org/image/ci9x5w8il/
maraf24 (2015-09-25 17:19:05+00:00): W razie kontynuowanie przez ciebie tematu Spiskiej rozpocznę temat na forum w wątku "Skasowano moją pracę".
esaulenka (2015-11-11 13:42:19+00:00): можно поинтересоваться, что такое "ТП ЛЦ-5-333 ф-5" и аналогичные странные значения?
NonnEmilia (2016-03-09 13:54:40+00:00): Attenzione che questo non è l'edificio vero e proprio, ma il cosiddetto "cassone" (importato assieme agli altri dai dati della regione Emilia Romagna).
Infatti ora viene segnato come cattedrale anche il palazzo vescovile e gli altri palazzi di Sottobroletto.
BushmanK (2016-01-20 03:52:33+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184671744 "Коробка"? Действительно? Как и все остальное на территории этого стадиона.
Владимир К (2016-01-20 13:32:24+00:00): Да-да, знаю. Давно это было. как дойдут руки, что-то перенесу в loc_name, что-то удалю
Chris Fleming (2015-10-08 10:23:57+00:00): A general  welcome to OpenStreetMap! This is a really great first Edit.I Just looking at the layout of the roads I don't suppose that this footpath also continues and connects onto Lothian Drive and/or Mayburn Road? Let me know if you have any question about OpenStreetMap.

Cheers
Chris
aceman444 (2015-09-25 18:48:45+00:00): Ten jeden presunuty bod asi nebude dobre, pozrite https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=34241142
aceman444 (2015-09-25 18:42:12+00:00): Dobry den, toto s tou Filozofickou fakultou nebude dobre. Preco ste odtrhli amenity=univerzity od jej nazvu? Neviem naco je dobre v tomto pripade amenity o pol metra sirsiu ako budovu, ale ked sa Vam to paci tak OK, ale nemozeme ju mat bez udajov. To je potom k nicomu. Tak ked to chcete mat ako dva objekty presunte vsetky nazvy aj adresy na Vas novy objekt. Dakujem.
aceman444 (2015-09-25 18:48:13+00:00): Aha, uz ste polovicu aj presunuli, ale este stale polovica zostala na budove a okrem toho su tam duplicity (na relacii a na obvode budovy), to ste mohli radsej upratat to. Samozrejme relaciu 3281275 ste nezaktualizovali :( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bratislava#Experimenty_2
aceman444 (2015-10-15 19:56:40+00:00): Opravil som. Okrem toho ste odstranili supisne cislo z budovy Pravnickej fakulty a neviem kam ste ho premiestnili (mozno nikam). Tak nabuduce davajte pozor. A patrilo by sa aj reagovat. Dakujem.
Blavak (2015-12-23 16:53:06+00:00): Ak som to bol ja, tak pardon, kludne opravte, co je zle.
pesec (2015-09-25 09:22:21+00:00): Меня тут в нарушении авторских обвинили.
Фотографию с вывеской названия улицы куда кому предъявить?
RSergei (2015-09-28 18:29:34+00:00): И кто это посмел обвинить?
А так фото можно на форум OSM в ветку Тюменская область
ilya-test (2015-11-12 08:57:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Объясните, пожалуйста, почему вы всё это удалили? Другие картографы этого региона просят откатить ваши правки.
Артурчик Огурчик (2016-01-22 19:51:17+00:00): Мусорная детализация, в одном дворе по 10 тропинок рисовать, это же нонсенс, глупо.
Zverik (2016-01-22 19:54:04+00:00): В OpenStreetMap, в отличие от других проектов, нет понятия «мусорная детализация». Каждый настолько подробно рисует карту, насколько ему нравится. Чтобы удалять работу других, особенно детальную, на которую ушло много времени, нужен хороший повод: несовместимость лицензий или несоответствие реальности. А детализация — хоть люки и отдельные деревья, только в плюс.

Кроме того, по пешеходным тропинкам у нас есть маршрутизация, и удалением вы её ломаете.
gnlpfth (2015-12-08 16:08:25+00:00): Hallo,
die Neupositionierung der Bushaltestelle ist falsch. Woher hast du diese Information?
Ich werde das bald wieder korrigieren.
luschi (2015-10-12 16:16:37+00:00): Straßen(highway=service) von und zu Parkflächen sowie auf Rastplätzen werden nicht mit service=parking_aisle getagt. Steht so auch im ersten Absatz der Wiki. Bitte berichtige das bei deinen anderen Änderungen.
Danke
lg
tyr_asd (2015-09-25 14:13:11+00:00): Hallo! Danke für die vielen hinzugefügten Punkte! Allerdings war bei einigen dieser POIs bereits eine Fläche dafür eingzeichnet, sodass die Information nach deinen Änderungen doppelt vorhanden ist. Zum Beispiel hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3758750086 / https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29033360

Die meisten dieser Doppelungen habe ich bereits wieder entfernt. Versuche also bitte zuerst zu überprüfen, ob bereits ein Objekt in OSM vorhanden ist, bevor du ein neues anlegst, bzw. wenn du weitere Informationen (z.B. Namen) hinzufügen willst, diese an das bereits existierende Objekt zu hängen.

Ansonsten: Gute Arbeit! Und viel Spaß weiterhin auf OpenStreetMap!

Gruß, Martin
SHARCRASH (2015-10-04 09:48:01+00:00): Hello,
Since you added this [empty line(???)](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372322112), you also falsified this [administrative boundary in way 50231865](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50231865) and this [administrative boundaries in way 295195567](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295195567). Since you are new to OSM i suggest you to read carefully and understand how all elements from OSM work in the diverse help pages & OSMwiki. Please correct the elements as they are supposed to be officially and delete that obsolete empty line if it has no purpose. If you are unsure, let me know and i will correct myself. But please learn all the necessary steps to use OSM. It is frustrating to see that the hard work of other contributors is being broken.
SHARCRASH (2015-10-04 16:27:14+00:00): Update for my previous message: fixed the issue myself, saw the problem and it didn't seem to be a big issue to fix.
literan (2015-09-26 10:57:35+00:00): и зачем это наслоение домов друг на друга? откатываю правку.
Пётр Фарбер (2015-09-28 04:40:35+00:00): Сорри, пока что ещё не очень разобрался как тут и что. Был такой вид карты, что показалось, что дом не указан :)
GerdP (2015-10-12 09:23:20+00:00): please review, 
way 372338082 looks as it is going to nowhere and is is going back and force
GerdP (2015-11-10 09:49:00+00:00): please review:
I've changed highway=residential_link
to 
highway=service
service=parking_aisle
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35210733
See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
BRodriguess (2015-09-25 15:00:01+00:00): Campo multiusos da Escola Dr. José Neves Júnior.
SK53 (2021-11-21 13:08:30+00:00): It's not really a ridge. From recollection it's actually a glacial roche moutonee : my mother used to climb up it as a child & I've been up it in the distant past too. No idea if it is accessible anymore.
andrewpmk (2015-09-25 15:55:10+00:00): Please use 7-Eleven not 7-11. I have corrected this.
jotpe (2015-10-12 19:28:41+00:00): Jemand ist nicht deiner Meinung, außer dem Flughafenzubringer eine Schnellstraße zu machen. Sehe ich übrigens auch so.
Siehe note: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/449037
Kaziu Kisiel (2015-10-30 16:01:08+00:00): Zmień tag z "highway=primary" (droga pierwszorzędna) na "highway=tertiary" (droga trzeciorzędna). Ta droga nie ma ciągłości.
muralito (2015-09-27 14:00:53+00:00): Hola, ¿El estatus legal de esas calles es que no esta permitido el acceso?¿El cambio de restriccion lo consultaste?
Pregunto porque en mi opinion seria "access=private" sin lugar a duda. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

Lo del ruteo es un caso particular, y si los datos en OSM estan bien, el ruteo tiene que resolverse de otra manera, no reetiquetando.
Souchong (2015-09-27 16:18:34+00:00): Yo entiendo que access=private se usa para que los programas de ruteo eviten completamente las vías que tienen esa etiqueta, como está descripto en http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate, mientras que access=destination es una etiqueta un poco menos restrictiva que se usa en el caso de tráfico local, no general, como sería en el caso de barrios cerrados. Un programa de ruteo debería permitir el ruteo en esos casos, por el interior de un barrio, aunque no debería permitirlo en el caso de un barrio cerrado que tuviera dos entradas y al calcular el camino más corto entre dos puntos exteriores al barrio, lo haga por calles dentro del barrio, entrando por un lado y saliendo por el otro. Eso se evita con access=destination, ya que rutearía por dentro del barrio solamente cuando se viaja a un punto interior.
muralito (2015-09-27 21:52:31+00:00): Està algo confusa la documentacion, pero es claro que en el private solo podes usarla si te feja el dueño, y el destination solo aplica a vehiculos, o sea que como lo marcaste al barrio privado podrias entrar caminando. (Creete que si.te van a dejar pasar caminando :-)
Justamente cuando va a un lugar cuyo punto de acceso es por una via con "access=private" es en esos que si se puede usar.

Al menos asi lo entiendo yo, y no he encontrado referencias concretas que apoyen claramente tu forma de entenderlo.

A mi ententer, el "avoid" de calle private es como un "avoid" de las "unpaved", que si lo unico que hay para llegar es unpaved lo usa igual.
Souchong (2015-09-27 23:09:55+00:00): Es confuso, sí. Me parece que por ahora lo voy a revertir a private hasta que tenga mejor información sobre el uso de destination (ojo que no se aplica solamente a vehículos, dice que es más frecuente esa aplicación pero no niega que se pueda aplicar a peatones). La descripción para access=destination tampoco dice que esa etiqueta sea de uso exclusivo en caminos públicos. Voy a hacer una pregunta en http://help.openstreetmap.org a ver qué opinan ahí.
Nunca hice la prueba de rutear por un barrio privado, pero no creo que sea un caso similar al de vías de comunicación sin pavimentar. Yo creo que sería un ruteo normal por las calles públicas, hasta la entrada al barrio, y luego una línea recta (ruteo directo) hasta el punto que nos interese ya que está prohibido rutear por caminos "private", mientras que los caminos no pavimentados sí son ruteables.
zarl (2016-04-19 08:40:21+00:00): Hallo jekyl,

die Löschung eines POI, nur weil es ein dazugehöriges Geschäft nicht mehr gibt, wird bei OSM nicht gern gesehen. Grund: man löscht damit auch die Historie der Läden dort. Besser ist es, wenn der Key "disused:" vorangestellt wird, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:

Ich werde diesen Changeset rückgängig machen, du hast da (sehr gut!) in dem Fall praktischerweise nur die eine Änderung vorgenommen.

Grüsse,
Zarl
zarl (2016-04-19 08:50:52+00:00): Den Node habe ich jetzt wiederhergestellt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38688673
Hjart (2015-09-25 18:23:36+00:00): Denne her cykelsti er asfalteret og lavet i år ?
Hjart (2015-09-25 18:24:36+00:00): Hvis det er tilfældet kan det være en god ide at tagge den surface=asphalt og start_date=*
ThomasA (2015-09-25 18:54:03+00:00): Ja, den er åbnet for nylig. Jeg opdaterer lige.
GerdP (2015-09-28 18:48:25+00:00): highway=crossing should be used for nodes,
not for ways, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
GerdP (2015-11-04 19:20:02+00:00): please review:
the tag highway=escalator is rarely used,
please use highway=footway
and the conveying=* tag, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:conveying
for details.
Snusmumriken (2015-11-04 19:44:23+00:00): It's much better to tag an escalator as an escalator
GerdP (2015-11-04 20:50:53+00:00): well, I don't know why it was "decided" that it should be tagged like that, 
But it was proposed, discussed, and is approved.
I just try to clean up the database so that data consumers  don't have to analyse a few hundreds different highway tags. I started a few weeks ago and since then more than 250 tags turned out to be typos, errors or out-aged. I consider highway=escalator as out-aged.
maraf24 (2015-11-07 09:52:51+00:00): Actually it should be highway=steps with conveying=* :)
_torsten_ (2017-05-16 05:45:56+00:00): Hallo Markus, 
sind die ganzen Wege auf dem Militärgeländer frei zugänglich? M.M.n. fehlen hier Zugangsbeschränkungen die access=no oder access=privat. 
Herzliche Grüße,
Torsten.
Markus366 (2017-05-16 11:12:18+00:00): Nein, alles innerhalb des Geländes ist access_privat . Danke für den Hinweis. Sobald ich dazu komme, ändere ich das.
Markus
mavl (2015-09-26 10:59:40+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
  
При переносе тега amenity=school cо здания на территорию нужно также переносить тег name. Иначе школа остаётся без названия.
Jojo4u (2015-11-22 16:17:35+00:00): Hallo Rini1, 

in Waldshut gibt es keinen Spurbus (bus_guideway) und auch die access Tags sind unnötig kompliziert. Ist der Weg auch tatsächlich baulich getrennt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372360701

LG Joachim
literan (2015-09-26 11:11:57+00:00): Вот такие художества https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325412084#map=17/55.63493/37.73407 расцениваю как вандализм. При повторе от меня будет направлен запрос о вашей блокировке. Откатываю полностью ваши правки
Nakaner (2015-10-16 13:51:25+00:00): Ich habe highway=construction durch vehicle:conditional=* ersetzt. Die kurze Sperrdauer rechtfertigt keinen so tief greifenden Eingriff in die Daten. Nicht jeder aktualisiert alle zwei Wochen seine Daten.

Wenn du schon meinst, auf construction umtaggen zu müssen, dann pass bitte auch Fahrstreifentagging und Tempolimit an.

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2014/10/ein-paar-worte-zum-baustellenmapping/
m902 (2015-09-25 21:21:26+00:00): Hi, I see that you have changed Yei Road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192167058#map=16/4.8449/31.5778) from oneway=yes to oneway=no. This is one of a pair of ways marking a divided highway. The other way (which you have also renamed as Yei Road) remains oneway=yes. Is there a reason for your change? Thank you
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-29 19:42:53+00:00): usuário deletou coisas que voce criou aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372374868
naoliv (2015-09-25 22:32:06+00:00): Só a metade da direita que tem o nome de Rua Fogo Apagou mesmo?
Você saberia o nome das outras ruas?
E não precisa colocar o endereço (addr:street) das ruas, já que o próprio nome delas já define o endereço.
KKS (2016-04-17 05:51:48+00:00): Привіт. А чого з'їзд з Патона на правий для велосипедів dismount? нормальний з'їздо-тротуарчик
XAN_ua (2016-04-17 11:08:54+00:00): Привіт, ця доріжка, НЯР, підпадає під опис з ПДР - "Тротуар — елемент дороги, призначений для руху пішоходів, який прилягає до проїзної частини або відокремлений від неї газоном". http://pdd.ua/ua/1/#%D0%A2%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B0%D1%80

В той же час, "Велосипедисту забороняється:
    в) рухатися по тротуарах і пішохідних доріжках (крім дітей до 7 років на дитячих велосипедах під наглядом дорослих);" http://pdd.ua/ua/6/#6

Тег Bicycle означаэ перш за все юридичний статус доступу, тому вважаю його використання тут доречним.