piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
danieldegroot2 (2022-01-19 23:26:37+00:00): I'd preferably leave out anything if it's not directly related to the object, like the organization a person's worked in. It usually doesn't sufficiently describe said person.
In that case, you may have a better, shorter description which you can fit in as a description or subject:description tag or whatever you prefer (ATYL; Any Tag You Like)
"remembers x, category y in place/time z".
Alternatively, you could add said wiki page yourself, but there's no need to do so of course.

The primary "wikidata" tag without any prefix-:-es as I understand it is only meant for the object itself, not for its subject, owner or the etymology of the object's name -though you could choose to leave out that last one if it is already described on the object's wiki page-. It's more appropriate to keep them apart.
VictorIE (2022-01-20 01:14:18+00:00): I had edited a few wiki links that day and this memorial came to mind. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3579222549 When I had added the memorial, there was a wiki for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Irish%20Citizen%20Army?uselang=en-GB but not (that I could find) for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Connolly
wambacher (2023-04-01 16:29:01+00:00): sorry, aber die Adresse kann nicht stimmen.
Diese Hütte liegt nicht in Feldafing sondern in Mittenwald und hat keine Straße oder gar Hausnummer.  Auch die PLZ ist falsch.

Sollte das hier die Kontaktadresse des Alpenvereins sein, hat die hier in dieser Form nix zu suchen. Dafür gibt es den Contact-Tag.
impiaaa (2022-01-29 19:38:21+00:00): Hello, and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I see that this changeset makes a number of problematic changes to the Almaden/Cherry intersection. See here for how divided highways should be mapped: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways In particular, multiple separate ways should only be used if there is a physical separation. Marked lanes can instead be mapped with various "lanes" keys: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes Indeed, way 417059700 for example already has lanes information, making way 1022444949 redundant. Additionally, turn restriction relations 7680884, 7680885, and 7680886 are now broken, and some of the new ways cross existing ways without intersecting.
impiaaa (2022-02-04 21:00:01+00:00): To fix this, I've reverted this change, and some of your other changes that did similar things, in changeset 117022116. I'm sorry. If it helps, here's a guide on modeling intersections that might be clearer than tagging reference: https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/ Finally, I do encourage you to join either the Code for San Jose map nights (https://www.meetup.com/code-for-san-jose/) or the OpenStreetMap US Slack (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/), where you can ask questions or ask for feedback. We're always looking for new members!
PaulC (2022-02-06 06:11:06+00:00): Sorry, I didn't mean to create work, or undo the work of others. I also appreciate the kind way you've let me know. Unfortunately, it sounds like OpenStreetMap may take more time to master than I have spare, which is a shame.
impiaaa (2022-02-06 20:45:49+00:00): You don't need to be a master, or have lots of spare time, to help contribute! For example, OSM South Bay has a list of our current projects here: https://github.com/codeforsanjose/OSM-SouthBay/blob/main/README.md#current-projects The MapRoulette projects only take a few minutes per task, and the SDP POI one has detailed instructions linked on the task page.
aweech (2022-01-19 15:43:40+00:00): Hi,
Just so you know, for places like this the address tag should only go on the main building, not outlying buildings like garages and barns.

Thank you for your contributions.

Sincerely,
aweech
elhide (2022-01-19 16:15:49+00:00): Well, the local fire department official stated they would like to see the address on outlying buildings?
Arun Madhavan (2022-01-19 09:45:34+00:00): I see a lot of contribution from yourside; Thank you for the same. You may experiment with JOSM considering your GIS skills.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116321819
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 12:23:53+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402321309/history has maxspeed = 0 that was added in this edit
what maxspeed=0 is supposed to mean? If moving for vehicles (or some of them) is not allowed, then maybe one of access tags should be used and maxspeed=0 is not needed?
jodd (2022-11-30 18:10:24+00:00): Hallo,
eine kurze Frage zu deinen Eintragungen: Ist die Packstation nur eine Packstation oder ist dort auch eine Postfiliale? 
Für reine Packstationen gibt es amenity=parcel_locker - du hast jedoch mit amenity=post_office eine ganze Filiale eingetragen.
Kannst du dir das bitte nochmal anschauen? Wenn du Hilft brauchst, melde dich gerne. Du kannst direkt im weißen Feld unten antworten.
VG jodd
rehmaster (2022-12-02 09:04:03+00:00): Hallo Jodd,
Danke für den Hinweis. Der Unterscheid war mir nicht so bekannt und wurde glaube ich auch nicht auf der iPhone App angezeigt, die ich genutzt habe. Ist jetzt aktualisiert.
Besten Gruß
Markus
jodd (2022-12-02 10:11:46+00:00): Perfekt, danke für die Anpassung!
Dimacn (2022-01-19 04:56:21+00:00): Скажите пожалуйста, что это за дорога идущая рядом и параллельно основной дороге? - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1022448814 Она реально там есть? Если нет, то зачем вы её нарисовали?
DUGA (2023-10-07 20:58:15+00:00): Charge stations are not supposed to an area, you should not ignore the warning.

Reverted.
user_10360149 (2022-01-19 03:13:28+00:00): 本次修改是采用Overpass查询后JOSM替换的方式

使用的查询语句为

[out:xml];{{geocodeArea:西安}}->.searchArea;(nwr["station"="subway"](area.searchArea););out body;>;out skel qt;

是Supaplex先生最讨厌的方式呢
Minh Nguyen (2022-08-17 21:52:42+00:00): Hi, OpenStreetMap isn’t generally the place to record historic details that are no longer present in some manner. As you’ve noted, these houses are now private property (and one of them apparently takes pains to inform visitors of that). It would be inappropriate to draw attention to these houses as if they’re tourist attractions, let alone tag them as neighborhood boundaries as you’ve done. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information for some things to keep in mind as you map private residences.

The Steve Jobs Garage is unquestionably a notable place, but it’s better to stick to the facts: changeset 125002456 downgrades the plot to just a plot and instead tags the garage itself as being listed on the Los Altos historic register. To avoid calling undue attention to the property, I’ve added more details to their neighbors along the street, and I encourage you to add similar detail.

If you’d like to record historical information that’s no longer present on the ground, please consider contributing to OpenHistoricalMap: https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/ It’s just getting off the ground, but there’s a lot of opportunity to geek out about the history of the software industry there.
user_10360149 (2022-01-19 03:13:13+00:00): 本次修改是采用Overpass查询后JOSM替换的方式

使用的查询语句为

[out:xml];{{geocodeArea:咸阳市}}->.searchArea;(nwr["station"="subway"](area.searchArea););out body;>;out skel qt;

是Supaplex先生最讨厌的方式呢
ElliottPlack (2022-01-21 04:54:21+00:00): I'd say you did a bit for than just update that Burlington ;) Looks good there. There was a troublesome mapper active around here that it looks like you may have cleaned up some bogus stuff.
MxxCon (2022-01-21 04:56:34+00:00): 😅 Sometimes I get carried away fixing iD's warning about templates and other simple stuff.
Dimacn (2022-01-19 04:40:05+00:00): Вы некорректно именуете улицы.
Правила написания названий улиц в OSM довольно чёткие: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог  Прошу вас исправить эту и все другие названия улиц.
Frans S (2022-01-19 12:57:39+00:00): Hello. A question about changing the tag of a unclassified highway here,
This piece of road was tagged as unclassified (unpaved) and in according with the wiki and changed by you into 'track' despite it leads to a settlement
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Values_based_on_economic_and_social_dimension_of_the_road
Please reconcider the tagging here.
Are you mapping for tomtom? Will a track be selected as passable road?
This was part of a #hotosm-project-8759 #COVMali
best regards
user_5359 (2022-01-20 17:50:41+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(node%5B%22%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E6%96%B9%E5%9D%97%22%5D%3Bway%5B%22%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E6%96%B9%E5%9D%97%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%22%E7%BB%93%E6%9E%84%E6%96%B9%E5%9D%97%22%5D%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B&C=34.24538;108.92521;18
What is the meaning of the second tag?
DeFra85 (2022-02-09 20:34:05+00:00): Hey, ich habe gesehen, dass du eine MTB Abfahrt im NSG Dörenther Klippen markiert hast. 
In Naturschutzgebieten ist generell das Verlassen der offiziell gekennzeichneten Wege verboten und im NSG Dörenther Klippen sogar jegliches Radfahren VERBOTEN!!!
Glitch-Hunter (2022-02-10 08:50:35+00:00): Ich kann nix kommentieren was nicht mehr existiert.
es macht keinen sinn estwas zu Kommeentieren und dann zu Löschen,
der Weg hört ja nicht auf zu existieren nur weil es Verboten ist.
OSM ist kein Katasta Amt´, man soll das mappen was auch wirklich existiert. ob etwas erlaubt oder Verboten ist spielt keine Rolle, 
Und wenn dann muss das von der Fläche "NSG" Verboten werden, nicht auf dem Pfad. 

was du gemacht hast ist Vandalismuss.
Existiert der Weg wirklich nicht mehr?
tastrax (2022-01-29 22:56:05+00:00): I was just checking phone numbers and there is an issue with the embassy in Perth Australia. You have listed multiple numbers and the first number also has too many digits. In general only a single number is listed in full international format  +61 8 xxxx xxxx. Do you know what the other numbers represent (fax, freecall etc)?
vietnam321 (2022-01-30 04:00:25+00:00): Hi tastrax. Sorry for listing too many numbers and the first number has too many digits. Also sorry that I am not familiar with how to write phone numbers on OSM. So please understand (you have corrected the rright phone number)
tastrax (2022-01-30 04:45:37+00:00): No problems at all. I just check Australian numbers each month. Always something to learn with OSM.
user_5359 (2022-01-20 15:57:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have look on http://www.osm.org/way/1022459823. What is the meaning of the tag BJ ART SILK = SERIGRAFIA?
NM$L (2022-01-27 18:11:22+00:00): Hi jonahsullivan, you deleted the outer boundary of Yongxing Is.. It seemed that the imagery you used is out of date, and the new shape is the boundary you deleted. I will restore this changset. Thank you.

Please check:
http://www.nhjd.net/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=327271&extra=&ordertype=1
and
https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2&lat=16.84039748212367&lng=112.33859895917703&zoom=16&preset=1-NATURAL-COLOR&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=100&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2020-10-01%7C2021-04-30&atmFilter=&showDates=false
aweech (2022-01-19 15:51:05+00:00): Hi,
This is a bus stop, not a store. Please pay attention as you are doing maproulette challenges.
MxxCon (2022-01-19 17:12:55+00:00): Hello.
Which exact part of my edit changed this bus stop into a store?
The only thing I changed in this node was the name of the BUS STOP to match that of the store. 
"Burlington Coat Factory" is not a thing anymore.
aweech (2022-01-19 17:19:01+00:00): Your edit changed the name of the bus stop to an incorrect name, not an incorrect amenity type. The name of the bus stop is still Burlington Coat Factory and likely will be for a very long time.
MxxCon (2022-01-19 17:37:08+00:00): It seems like you don't know how to read changesets or don't understand what they do.
Perhaps these 2 sites will show you better:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/5638710760
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/5638710760
I will accept my apology from you now.
MxxCon (2022-01-19 17:47:08+00:00): Here are 3 more visualizations that show that I did NOT change amenity of this node! This was a bus stop before I edited and it was a bus stop after I edited it! At no point was this EVER a store!
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116323976
https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=116323976
https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#116323976
aweech (2022-01-19 17:59:46+00:00): I found this changeset from OSMCha doing my daily reviews; I am very familiar with the tools to visualize changesets. Perhaps the thing you're confused about is when I said that this is a bus stop, not a store? I had assumed that MapRoulette brought you here due to your changeset comment and that you had unthinkingly accepted its recommended change, as so many people do. Maybe you went outside the bounds of the challenge to make the naming error. I did say further up the chain that the error was in changing the name to "Burlington", not the amenity type. My apologies that my language confused you.
Kovoschiz (2022-01-19 09:59:59+00:00): Nth reminder: `name=` is for the common name in use, not what you think is correct or proper.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Mxdanger (2022-03-06 01:44:14+00:00): When splitting a road into a dual carriageway please check ALL the tags especially :forward and :backward tags, as you left the turn lanes unmodified in the change. The adjacent junction was also incorrectly set up missing one-way segments and messed up turn restrictions.
anilkgba (2022-10-31 12:59:18+00:00): Hi, 

We apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting my edit. Apologies for adding incorrect turn lane tags and turn restrictions, it is an honest mistake from my end. Going forward, I'll ensure to be extra cautious while splitting the segment into dual carriage way. 

Thanks once again for fixing the edit, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
anilkgba
alester (2022-01-19 18:57:31+00:00): I've reverted this changeset to restore the previous tags. This is an area where vehicles can drive in many directions not restricted by lanes, which is exactly what highway=* + area=yes is intended to represent. This isn't just the outline of a highway. See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway?uselang=en#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area.3Dyes_on_a_highway
del_account (2022-03-31 08:09:08+00:00): I`m sorry for this mistake, thank u!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
ChehrehBargi (2023-05-06 14:09:51+00:00): سلام، ضمن تقدیر از زحمات شما
ابتدای خیابان فرهنگ 3 ، به شکل سه راهی نیست و با جدول یا مانع دیگری به سه قسمت جدا نشده. لذا با یک اتصال به خیابان شهیدان باقری زنده دل، وصل می گردد.
Firefishy (2022-02-02 09:38:42+00:00): Awesome first edit. Thank you
jessegreaves (2022-02-02 11:23:16+00:00): Much appreciated. Have a lot more to add, just need to find a gap in the schedule.
dadavid (2025-05-03 20:04:31+00:00): Hi, du hast hier [1] die amenity=fire_station entfernt. ist dort keine aktive Wache mehr? 

VG

[1] https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/265032688
MarshMello___ (2022-01-22 01:03:09+00:00): Ouch, that's a large area...
holgerd (2022-06-09 19:16:22+00:00): Hi, I’m the co-founder of Wheelmap and responsible for this. Firstly, on behalf of the whole Wheelmap project: Our apologies, we strive to be good OSM community members!

We are aware that large changesets are a problem and working on fixing it. Please find our plans and the status here: https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-frontend/issues/329

The reason we did not reply earlier is, that I made one embarrassing mistake: The “wheelmap_visitor” user profile had an outdated e-mail address, so I did not get notifications and I did not notice this. I fixed it now and made sure all changeset comments in the future will be answered by me or our community management team.
Arun Madhavan (2022-01-19 09:40:35+00:00): Hi, it may be a village or town  not city for sure
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116328368
user_5359 (2022-01-19 16:03:51+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ist die Software GmbH ein Geschäft https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop, ein Büro https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:office oder ein Handwerker https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft ?
Max-Kritic (2022-01-21 17:26:17+00:00): Bonjour,

Osmose indique une erreur avec nat_ref. Une solution ?
dirif_cct (2022-01-22 08:30:11+00:00): une mise a jour d'osmose :
les erreurs http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?item=9019&class=9019002&country=france%2a
sont détectées a partir de cette regle :
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Rules/FranceSpecificRules
qui a été mise a jour.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-02-03 03:19:37+00:00): Hi,
I think you missed an "S" from the school name here 
I'd fix it, but iD is throwing a whole heap of school operator related validation issues at me and I'm not sure the best way to resolve them
nickvet419 (2022-02-03 03:32:08+00:00): that should take care of it.  Just needed to upgrade the tags for Killeen ISD with wikidata
WoodWoseWulf (2022-02-03 03:44:04+00:00): Great work, thank you!
Ars-UA (2022-01-19 08:39:43+00:00): Из трёх частей потому, что по средней части невозможно проехать ни на машине, ни на велосипеде.
Maxim232 (2022-01-19 09:05:00+00:00): Спасибо, понятно, у нас программа из-за этого участка ошибку выдает. Будем думать как у нас это исправить.
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-01 04:51:49+00:00): Hello AdhikariAmulya. Your edit looks awesome, but I delete the building due not exist on the imagery (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30237/task/142648840). Thank you.
user_5359 (2022-01-19 16:01:51+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wenn Dein Änderungskommentar richtig ist fehlt noch ein maxspeed:hgv=30 (:hgv steht für LKW über 3,5t)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-19 13:19:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122579361 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some changes that appear to be mostly vandalism in Iraq.
Sanniu (2022-01-20 07:21:56+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009639941 - is it under construction? In this case it should be tagged as highway=construction and construction=residential.
eggie (2022-01-19 08:54:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Bestaat Ampelmann Operations B.V.  op adresnode 209 dan nog wel?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
daan166 (2022-01-19 12:20:00+00:00): Beste Eggie,
Ampelmann zit niet langer op deze lokatie. Ik zal deze dan verwijderen.
Groeten,
Daan
eggie (2022-01-19 12:22:45+00:00): Oke Daan.. maar dan graag met behoud van de BAG data.
De info van het nieuwe bedrijf dan combineren met de BAG adresnode.
Gr eggie
cyton (2022-01-19 10:01:31+00:00): Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116330615
Shoorick (2022-01-19 23:35:29+00:00): Hello,

Your deletions make map worse. They deteriorate pedestrian navigation. I've tested it with OsmAnd in Vilnius and I found that routes are weird because of missing footways. I tried to use OsmAnd for navigation in Russian cities (Moscow, Chelyabinsk and smaller cities and towns) where pedestrian ways wasn't deleted and quality of navigation in Russia is better than in Lithuania.
Tomas Straupis (2022-01-20 06:10:28+00:00): In Lithuania we have agreed NOT to map sidewalks as separate ways if they are not separated by a physical barrier. The reason is that such vectors increase a chance of errors of routing graph (which is what attracted me to that location - errors). You have to tag sidewalks with corresponding tags on main ways.
Shoorick (2022-01-20 09:25:08+00:00): “Physical barrier” is fuzzy term. Which barrier do you mean? Granite kerb, grass, fence? I checked Smolensko gatvė few days ago near house 19, street contains (from west to east):
* house,
* concrete pedestrian way,
* grass with trees,
* kerb,
* asphalt road,
* kerb,
* concrete plates,
* red asphalt bicycle lane,
* concrete pedestrian way,
* house.

But map contains only one highway between houses.
Tomas Straupis (2022-01-20 09:59:39+00:00): If there is a continuous grass with trees between sidewalk and road - that does count as a physical barrier. But very few people ten to add such information as it of minimal usefulness, only works if ALL sidewalks are tagged in such a way and most importantly it introduces a lot of errors. Power mappers tend to not add such things therefore for the sake of homogenity such information is pointless. Pedestrian routing can only be solved by improving routing software, not by adding spaghetti to map data.
maraf24 (2022-01-19 09:21:16+00:00): Znowu to samo? Droga jest w budowie - ale jezdnie nie są.
Budowa jest od dawna zaznaczona.
Przestań tagować pod render.
szalona_entropia (2022-01-19 09:53:56+00:00): Tak, znowu to samo. Na jakim etapie uznasz, że "jezdnie są w budowie"?
szalona_entropia (2022-01-19 09:57:06+00:00): Przestań tagować pod swoje niczym nieuzasadnione w zasadach mapowania OSM widzimisię.
maraf24 (2022-01-19 11:53:01+00:00): Jezdnie będą w budowie gdy będzie można rozpocząć ich budowę. Czyli gdy będzie coś pod nimi - most lub nasyp.
maraf24 (2022-01-19 11:56:30+00:00): Budowę monitoruję regularnie i nanoszę potrzebne zmiany.
Nie ma potrzeby poprawiania po mnie, a szczególnie nie należy usuwać z osm danych, które zebrałem w terenie.
Ostatnio zauważyłem, że masz problemy z wieloma zasadami osm - jak kategorie dróg i ich numeracja.