piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-03-08 13:09:52+00:00): 'k heb nu tunnel=building_passage gemaakt, een boom en een sukje landuse=grass. Probeer er wat van te maken. De basisschool is nu een university ... alleen de node moet nog naar de juiste plaats. Kom je er niet uit.. gewoon vragen.
mavl (2019-01-18 16:43:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-03-09 00:55:36+00:00): Czy już prosiłem o prawidłowe tagowanie adresów? https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
DannyAiquipa (2017-03-10 23:07:11+00:00): Hey there! great work ! Please can you review and fix overlapping highways , please !
Best 
Danny
maraf24 (2017-03-09 07:42:00+00:00): Usunięty.
slowtux (2017-03-13 04:43:48+00:00): Guten Morgen,
bei 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1221306094#map=19/51.02672/7.56782
sollte doch nur der Name der Straße drin stehen.
mfg
slowtux
pitscheplatsch (2017-03-11 21:36:16+00:00): Hi felixjiang, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 
See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46673790
eggie (2017-03-08 08:57:23+00:00): Goed bezig!
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2017-03-08 13:12:58+00:00): Lees nog even wat ik getipt heb over de Muzentuin.
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-08 09:23:56+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 46670151, 46670152, 46670155, 46671211, 46671214, 46671215, 46671227, 46671228, 46671229, 46671406, 46671408, 46671410, 46671484, 46671486, 46671487, 46671507, 46671509, 46671510, 46671598, 46671600, 46671604, 46671610, 46671613, 46671614, 46671629, 46671630, 46671632, 46671662, 46671665, 46671667, 46671672, 46671673, 46671674, 46671687, 46671688, 46671689, 46671699, 46671704, 46671707, 46671764, 46671816, 46671823, 46671828, 46671831, 46671843, 46671848, 46671855, 46671897, 46671915, 46671917, 46671918, 46671939, 46671940, 46671941, 46671965, 46671968, 46671971, 46672169, 46672196, 46672262.
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-03-09 00:50:46+00:00): Czy mógłbym prosić o rysowanie wyłącznie obrysów, bez przenoszenia adresów na te obrysy? Szkoda Twojej i mojej pracy. Dziękuję.
literan (2017-03-08 11:37:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не надо ставить тег здания (building=garages) на всю территорию парковки, включая дороги. Только на контур самих гаражей. Здесь я это откатил.
Aleks-Berlin (2017-03-09 07:17:05+00:00): Hi bermiego, please follow the rules from OSM wiki (wikipedia=lang:Name), see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
Thanks, Alex
bermiego (2017-03-09 10:54:10+00:00): Thanks Alex.
I had not read before those rules; The next time I'll make it correctly
SvenQ (2017-03-08 10:23:40+00:00): Da sich die Situation vor Ort in den nächsten Monaten sowieso grundsätzlich ändern wird, habe ich aus Gründen der Übersichtlichkeit die alten Fahrspuren komplett entfernt, so dass jetzt nur noch die temporäre Fahrbahn übrig ist. 
Wenn es wesentliche Änderungen gibt, dann werde ich das natürlich Stück für Stück aktualiseren.
ForstEK (2017-08-25 13:09:10+00:00): Привет!
Отмечай, пожалуйста, ШРП тегами pipeline=substation и substance=gas (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:pipeline%3Dsubstation). Ещё название ШРП пишется в тег ref=*, name для другого, чтобы не портить адресный поиск.
eggie (2017-03-08 11:11:06+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-08 11:17:25+00:00): info fitness op adresnode gezet.. anders dubbele adressen
eggie (2017-03-08 11:56:37+00:00): McDonald 's staat er nu wel 2x op. Is dat de bedoeling.
Raphaelbunck (2017-03-08 16:55:46+00:00): Sorry, op maps.me stond alleen de mcdrive, dus ik dacht dat het fout was. Ik zal voortaan wijzigingen via hier doen.
eggie (2017-03-08 18:24:10+00:00): prima
althio (2017-03-09 09:59:09+00:00): Hi Nakaner,

Please engage more in discussion with the mapper before you revert.

Specifically on changeset 46666195, the data from learnosm test data (fictional additions around (0,0)) must be removed indeed, so thank you for watching carefully.

The other part of changeset 46666195 is a brand new mapper, first edit, most likely very local knowledge. These edits *are* worth enough to be kept.
Nakaner (2017-03-09 10:53:10+00:00): It was just moving of some nodes below 3 metres, that's why I decided that it is not worth enough to be kept.

Please fix LearnOSM to prevent such vandalism in future!
althio (2017-03-09 11:41:25+00:00): It was not just moving and geometry, you missed that a few tags were added and they were also reverted.

It is understandable that the added tags can be missed during your review. JOSM history or achavi can help there. Nonetheless it would have been more correct to take the time to assess, discuss, welcome the new user and cherry-pick the worthwhile edits.

It would have been really nice to follow the guidelines for a "Normal revert": "If the extent of the vandalism is local and impact for the overall community is limited then make polite direct human contact via OSM Messaging or changeset discussions assuming good intentions and wait for 24-48 hours for a response."

I would kindly recommend that you engage with the user, explain to a newbie what was wrong in the user edit, explain to a newbie what you did with the revert.
Maybe you can consider putting back the correct tags and some kind words to the user for contributing for the first time and getting to grips with OSM and JOSM.

I am going to keep this changeset discussion on topic, that is to say to discuss this changeset and your revert only. On the other hand, you already know where to go to discuss, report or contribute to LearnOSM: https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm/issues/335
althio (2017-03-20 17:04:46+00:00): Hi Nakaner,

Have you contacted the mapper to explain what was good and what was wrong in this first edit?

Do you plan to cherry-pick the good changes that were reverted? I mean the alignment&geometry (adding nodes and moving nodes by more than 3 metres) and the new tags.
althio (2017-03-23 22:48:30+00:00): No discussion before the revert, no meaningful discussion after. I disagree it was vandalism, only well-meaning contribution with a beginner mistake.

I went ahead and returned to the data for the part that looked like well-intended improvement. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47109582
user_3216889 (2017-03-08 13:43:05+00:00): Huisnummers staan altijd op aparte nodes, niet op het pand zelf.
Het hoofdpand (aan de weg) is hier al voorzien van huisnummer 8. Schuren, stallen etc. hebben meestal geen apart huisnummer, in dit geval ook niet.
Gelieve dit ongedaan te maken.
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
Alexander-II (2017-09-10 14:16:32+00:00): Здравствуйте. Добавляя https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4723905989 как amenity=community_centre что вы имели в виду? Магазин/торговый центр "Детский мир"?
Geofreund1 (2017-05-09 15:38:42+00:00): Die von Dir eingezeichneten Gebäude sind so in Bing nicht zu sehen. Sind die in Bing sichtbaren Gebäude evtl. abgerissen worden?
Was ist mit der HN 14 passiert?
Sonnenhunger (2017-05-09 15:45:27+00:00): Hi, die Bing-Karten sind veraltet, ebenso Google, TomTom und Co. Ich selber wohne um die Ecke und habe erst gestern drei relativ neue Häuser eingetragen (Roggenweg 7+7a, 9 und 11). HN 14 wurde ebenso wie die alte HN 16 vermutlich im Herbst 2015 zugunsten des Neubaus HN 16 abgerissen.
Geofreund1 (2017-05-09 16:38:45+00:00): Danke für die Info!
Ein HN Eintrag "7+7a" ist allerdings nicht ganz korrekt; besser zwei Tags mit 7 und 7a als Knoten innerhalb des Hausumrings eintragen oder - falls du das bevorzugst - "7, 7a" am Hausumring.
Sonnenhunger (2017-05-10 07:34:15+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, habe ihn berücksichtigt.
marc__marc (2020-01-15 00:08:55+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4723906746
is "luxury campsite" the name of it ? or only a descriptive quality of it ?
letihu (2017-07-10 10:57:21+00:00): Hier sind jetzt 3 Linien übereinander gemappt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479256759/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479256759/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94976701/history#map=18/51.32211/12.40337
maraf24 (2017-03-08 21:39:19+00:00): Reverted.
anieto (2017-04-04 20:33:57+00:00): Reverted in #47455501. It has wrong editions and the user has made vandalism before
Polarbear (2018-01-11 12:40:10+00:00): Hi, when you delete a feature, it is a good idea to say why.

Has the club been closed permanently?
maraf24 (2017-03-08 21:39:30+00:00): Reverted.
DannyAiquipa (2017-03-10 21:42:10+00:00): Hey Olivia, great work here! Can you fix  the overlapping highways please , i found a lot. Thanks!
maraf24 (2017-03-08 16:12:50+00:00): Uzasadnij te zmiany.
maraf24 (2017-03-08 21:37:22+00:00): Reverted.
user_3216889 (2017-03-08 14:04:20+00:00): recycling_type=centre gebruiken voor grotere afvalbrengstations

Bij een (of een paar) containers:
recycling_type=container
en een of meerdere:
recycling:glass_bottles=yes
recycling:paper=yes
etc

Zie ook:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
RafalR (2017-03-13 10:16:33+00:00): Dlaczego do adresów dodajesz addr:city jeśli jest już addr:place i to w dodatku z błędem np tak jak tu -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3470520063
olehz (2017-03-21 23:24:12+00:00): Чим можете підтвердити правку, що цей будинок відноситься до Орлика, а не до Володимира Великого?
Hoff1980 (2017-03-08 15:32:19+00:00): I think, there are errors in your changeset. Are you sure that a bus stop is on a taxiway at Geneva Airport (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4724025690#map=17/46.23312/6.10960)?? The same is valid for the other nodes created. Please source this edit, otherwise it will be reverted shortly!!
Thanks
datendelphin (2017-03-08 19:06:20+00:00): Looks like you wanted to make notes for you. But you edited the map for everyone. Please do not upload your notes to the map, it will just get deleted
RoterEmil (2017-03-13 18:20:43+00:00): your other changeset seem to be quite similar: please don't add private comments (or whatever that is) to OSM, thank you!
highflyer74 (2017-03-09 07:39:24+00:00): Moin Jony!

Danke für das Eintragen der Daten! Denke bitte daran, neu eingezeichnete Gebäude im Anschluss rechtwinklig zu machen. Der Editor iD hat dafür eine Funktion, mit der Du dies auf Knopfdruck erledigen kannst. In diesem Fall habe ich es schon erledigt.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich gern!
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
jpennycook (2017-03-08 18:29:53+00:00): Hello Andy.
I see you removed the traffic signals in this edit.  I mapped them separately because he Wiki page for Traffic Signals has "strongly recommended" for separately listing traffic signals from the associated crossing.  It gives an an example under "Pedestrian crossing without intersection" - "Pedestrian crossings separately mapped", which seems to match this case (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals).
In addition, my journey planner regards highway=traffic_signals as something that slows down traffic significantly, but regards a crossing differently - another reason I map them separately.

Jon
AndyJ71 (2017-03-08 20:35:08+00:00): Hi Jon, yes it does look like that example is relevant in this case. I had looked at this before and I note the examples have since been updated in October 16. It does represent a change to how crossings in the UK have been generally mapped so far (and there is some discussion on that on the talk page). - Andy.
ACS1986 (2017-03-09 12:32:33+00:00): Hi, 
I noticed this changeset and it made me question whether I had been mapping crossings correctly. I've started a thread on the Talk-GB mailing list to see if there is any consensus among other UK mappers about how they should be tagged: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/
AndyJ71 (2017-03-09 12:58:33+00:00): Hi ACS1986, that was my initial thought too about routers seeing multiple lights. I suspect that different routing engines will interpret this differently. Looking at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRouteService#Used_OSM_Tags_for_Routing it does appear that highway tags are used for routing, and not crossing tags, for vehicles at least. Let's see what the consensus on the mailing list is. Cheers, Andy.
ACS1986 (2017-03-09 13:24:16+00:00): Thanks Andy, that's good to know.
It had also occurred to me since writing my message that crossings at complex junctions are often mapped separately, particularly where cycleways are involved so it would be an existing problem for routers if they did count crossings as separate sets of lights. My only remaining concern now is whether we would really want routing software considering pedestrian crossings in the same way as proper intersections. A main road with frequent pedestrian crossings could appear to be a much slower route than it actually is.
Regards,
Adam
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
lleung (2017-08-30 18:43:07+00:00): 兰亭盛荟东区（建设中）:
landuse=construction
construction=residential
Константин Гам (2018-11-26 09:54:16+00:00): Почему у добавляемых вами магазинов нет name?
yuryleb (2018-11-26 10:29:17+00:00): "Типовое" название "Продукты" вроде как не следует добавлять, разве не вы сами их удаляли когда-то?
Константин Гам (2018-11-26 12:12:23+00:00): Вы что-то путаете. А добавлять названия надо с местности.

Типовое было бы "Продуктовый магазин" - это вид обьекта в названии, а "Продукты" - нет
eggie (2017-03-08 17:11:13+00:00): "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
naoliv (2017-03-08 23:13:39+00:00): natinacio, porque está reclassificando essas vias tudo de novo?
natinacio (2017-03-09 13:23:03+00:00): Por que a Avenida Presidente Kennedy não seria melhor classificada como um  via primaria e tambem a via marignal a via expressa como uma terciaria e a junção delas todas no trevo perto de São vicente como terciaria, não seria melhor tudo primária ??
naoliv (2017-03-18 18:19:48+00:00): Acho que dá para agrupar tudo no trevo da praça da tribuna sim (ao invés de deixar os trechos no local como tertiary).
Mas não me parece que precise ser uma classificação maior que secondary.
Владимир К (2017-03-10 12:54:17+00:00): Статусы дорог здесь надо сделать ниже. service например
poschon (2017-03-18 13:46:00+00:00): Hi LvdT,

I see you changed the street. Now I know how I have to map the hystoric road (GRAZIE!), but now the road is not visible on the map. I will put for the highway=path to make the road visible.

You changed also the name. I saw the name “Via Per Montova” on the plate close to this road. Did I done some mistake with the name?

Poschon
LvdT (2017-03-18 15:15:29+00:00): Yes, as far as I'm aware, it's a segment of the ancient Via Aemilia, where exactly did you see the name plate?
poschon (2017-03-18 20:07:55+00:00): The plate describe the histori of this street. The plate is on the south end of the street.
LvdT (2017-03-19 12:33:38+00:00): Indeed, it's not the Via Aemilia as I had thought, but rather the Mutina-Mantua (which, by the way, is Mantova with an a). I fixed it, thanks for pointing it out.
PT-53 (2017-03-08 15:43:43+00:00): Hallo chrislybaer,
bei einem Radgeschädt sollte zum shop=sports auch noch die Sportart sport=cycling eingetragen werden.
(Siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dsports + http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dcycling)
Machst Du das noch ?
Grüße
chrislybaer (2017-03-08 16:21:01+00:00): Hallo PT
Danke für die Info. Mache ich gleich.
Grüße
eggie (2017-03-08 17:11:50+00:00): "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-08 17:21:05+00:00): De pedestrian zit nergens aan vast. Aan de Oostzijde heb ik 'm vastgemaakt en ook een verbinding gegeven de serviceroad. Loopt het niet door aan de westzijde naar de volgende zijstraat?
pfg21 (2020-09-04 09:36:56+00:00): месье ну зачем же масло маслянное :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479021624
Alexander-II (2017-03-08 17:17:37+00:00): Что-то у вас lift_gate к дорогам не прилепились. А точка https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4724253645 с указанием религии создалась дублем, на церкви там уже указан этот параметр. Неужели османд так косячит? :(
nyampire (2017-03-09 09:57:44+00:00): こんにちは。

複数のユーザより、あなたの編集の多くが誤りを含むものであったり、既存のデータを破壊するものであったりするものだという報告をうけています。
この行為はOSMデータに対する破壊行為とみなされます。
編集されたデータは、世界中の人々によって利用されています。
誤ったデータを投入することは避けてください。

また、Pokemonに関する編集については、こちらのページにガイドラインがあります。
ご一読をいただき、今後の編集についてご一考くださいますようお願いします。
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/01/27/tips-pokemon-go/?lang=ja
pkoby (2017-03-09 02:04:47+00:00): Hey MG,

Just wanted to point out that the name=* field is used for the actual visible name of things. For the hydrant, for instance, if it said "Disconnected" on it, that would be accurate, but since I assume that you're trying to indicate that the hydrant is inoperable, I would suggest adding a "Lifecycle prefix", so perhaps disused:emergency=fire_hydrant would be an option.

As for the ruins, if they're not actually named, perhaps you could put that information in a description=* tag.

Happy mapping!
MGnome (2017-03-09 02:26:55+00:00): This one actually says 'Disconnected' on a large black collar hanging vertically on one side.  But the tip was one I didn't know, so thanks!
Владимир К (2017-03-10 12:53:10+00:00): Пожалуйста, исправьте эти проезды. статус дорог завышен, название микрорайона на дороге не нужно. Ссылки с документацией я вам в личку отправил
PennStationBlues (2017-03-08 16:46:04+00:00): I messed up the title of this change. I tweaked things around the Beechview rail line
Spanholz (2017-03-20 20:22:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

you added a lot of sidewalks here. But they are kind of useless because they are not connected to the streets. 

Here an example why: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=43.02394%2C-77.71901%3B43.02402%2C-77.71891
SomeoneElse (2017-03-08 17:22:58+00:00): Hehe - and congratulations for allowing for the offset!

https://news.virginia.edu/content/researchers-explain-why-greenwich-prime-meridian-moved
FTA (2017-03-21 15:13:26+00:00): Hi woodennature,
I see you have moved many of the German names of streets and places to the "name=" position in Germany. Keep in mind that translations to other languages should be in the respective keyspace, such as they were in name:de. Chinese names usually include both the Pinyin and English versions in the name= tag. You can see the wiki page for more information: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name. If you have any questions, do let me know.
Thanks,
Ethan aka FTA
Mirasolera (2017-06-08 10:29:44+00:00): Hi, i cannot see that there is a way. Or why you put it there?
DerGuteMercator (2017-06-08 22:12:35+00:00): Well, there used to be one - you can see it on old aerial images in Google Earth. But Bing have updated  their aerial images some days ago and from what I can see the way seems to be gone on the new photos, probably demolished I will remove it.
DD1GJ (2017-03-08 19:55:27+00:00): Hallo templer1962, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Das Projekt bildet die reale Welt ab und ist keine Spielwiese, um Elternhäuser zu kennzeichnen oder fiktive Krankenhäuser anzulegen. Daher habe ich alle Deine Änderungen zurückgesetzt. Wie alles funktioniert, kannst Du im Tutorial nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
jeka p (2017-04-02 15:41:20+00:00): Hallo,

ist es eine Schranke? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4724473133/history falls ja - bitte entsprechend markieren:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier

Gruss,
Jeka
GerdP (2017-08-24 06:41:03+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you map a lot of crossings.
Unfortunately you used highway=crossing + footway=crossing instead of highway=footway+footway=crossing
Please review http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing#The_crossing_tag
GerdP (2017-08-31 13:19:58+00:00): I've changed them all, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51615120
getBounds (2017-08-31 21:06:45+00:00): Thanks this was a work project and I haven't had much time to work on it lately. I feel like I got that tag structure from somewhere but not sure where thanks for fixing it. Initially I thought we would do more sidewalk Imports to osm but now not so sure. The import was more difficult than I anticipated.
getBounds (2017-08-31 21:10:32+00:00): Now I remember. I asked on an OS M Forum how to properly tag the crosswalks so they would render in one of the basic openstreetmap Styles. I got a snarky response so I think that turned me off for a while.