piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Enock4seth (2022-07-13 23:51:58+00:00): Dear Cute Lady,

Thanks for mapping. Unfortunately using a series of hashtags that do not tell anything relating to what you have mapped here is a very bad practice. Please kindly use meaningful descriptions that describe briefly what you did.
silversurfer83 (2022-07-14 09:12:49+00:00): Hi. Du hast ein Review angefordert :)
Die Informationen sehen aus der Ferne ganz gut erfasst aus. Das Museum hätte auch als Punkt in das Gebäude gesetzt werden können, ist aber am Ende egal. Außerdem wären irgendwelche Kontaktmöglichkeiten für das Museum recht hilfreich.
Bei der Werbeagentur sieht das besser aus. Telefonnummern dürfen grundsätzlich gerne im Internationalen Format (+49  123 3458834) eingetragen werden. Ist aber auch kein Problem.
Also: Gut gemacht, danke, dass mithilfst. Gerne mehr. Und bei Fragen einfach melden.
-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123583133
mariotomo (2022-09-11 17:59:39+00:00): hola. te interesa mapear más árboles? con gusto te apoyo. mientras tanto revisa el conjunto de cambios https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126059656
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-13 22:47:34+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej zmiany? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3185591 czy tez coś innego?
Foxune (2022-07-14 00:12:42+00:00): adres ustalony na podstawie https://sp31.eduportal.bielsko.pl
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-14 09:25:29+00:00): O, to dodałem stronę szkoły do OSM: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123599325 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173988050
JJIglesias (2022-07-13 23:21:54+00:00): Creo q en Operator Type pusiste PUBIC en vez de Public
5m4u9 (2022-07-14 05:41:01+00:00): gracias por reportar, corregido :/.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-29 20:27:26+00:00): This edit appears to be adding

foot=no @ (Mo-Su 18:00-07:00)

1) are you aware that it is an invalid broken tag? foot:conditional should be used

2) are you sure that there are such legal restriction?

Also, where this mass edit was discussed?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-29 20:44:24+00:00): Is "Some neighborhoods in this city are too dangerous to transit normally, therefore we the Venezuelan mappers have decided add access restriction tags on the streets of certain areas to protect the safety of navigation apps users" the reason for such edit?

It seems like a case of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Incorrect_tagging_for_the_renderer though I understand tricky situation.

But, can you link where this edit was discussed? And note that invalidly formed access tag is unlikely to be processed.
Wilmer Osario (2022-07-30 12:32:11+00:00): In Venezuela we have the problem that some areas of the city are too dangerous to travel or walk, and that has already caused serious problems for some mappers who live in this city

I was testing the use of some that restrict access tags in those areas, without being too extreme, testing them in navigation apps like OsmAnd and MagicEarth; but we haven't been able to find a correct way to do it without being so extreme.

We were discussing both the Venezuelan community and the Latam community (https://t.me/OSMLatam), and we have not reached an agreement on what to do about it.

For now, the user (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/albertoq) is the one who is dedicating himself to adding access restriction tags in dangerous areas of the city.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-30 12:43:41+00:00): The problem here is that

foot=no @ (Mo-Su 18:00-07:00)

is invalidly formed

foot:conditional=no @ (Mo-Su 18:00-07:00)

would be the correct form.

Problem here is that time-dependent conditional access tags are nearly unsupported.

So
foot=no @ (Mo-Su 18:00-07:00)
is both invalid and unsupported by navigation apps, while
foot=yes
foot:conditional=no @ (Mo-Su 18:00-07:00)
is just unsupported but at least is a valid tagging (even if misused in this case)
Enock4seth (2022-07-13 23:49:30+00:00): Hi Alifo Ruth,

I don't know where you are getting these ghost buildings from. They seem not to exist. 

Your changeset comment #vacchallenge is also not helpful; it doesn't tell what you have mapped here. 

Could you please clarify what you are trying to do here?
Alifo Ruth (2022-10-14 11:31:41+00:00): Please in addition to the existing changeset comment i should also add the features I  mapped to it?
JhowieNitnek (2022-07-14 19:15:16+00:00): Hi, I was not confused about the smaller base on UrbIS, the reason In made it bigger is because the building is bigger with pillars and stuff. Could you please revert this change?
bxl-forever (2022-07-15 11:41:44+00:00): Hello,

There is an elegant solution to this situation, i.e. joining the two parts within a type=building relation.  This will also improve rendering for 3D modelling, I know some people care about that too.

Normally, you should see the building rendered as much larger now, while we keep the basic shape on the ground.
Warin61 (2025-07-05 01:40:46+00:00): Hi,
Fire trails that are navigatable by vehicles are not OSM paths but tracks as a minimum. The access may be restricted using the access tag, that could be motor_vehicle=private to indicate that management vehicles could use the track while the general public could be excluded.
Warin61 (2025-07-07 09:29:52+00:00): Meryla Flora Reserve nee State Forest - open. 
https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/visit-a-park/parks/meryla-flora-reserve
AkuAnakTimur (2022-07-14 00:47:42+00:00): https://kartaview.org/details/3819381/270/track-info

https://kartaview.org/details/3819381/253/track-info
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-24 13:32:51+00:00): Hello!

Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3955990 ?
AkuAnakTimur (2022-07-14 01:04:11+00:00): Geometry positioning: of course, the midpoint-ish between Kg Kok Bedullah's sign and the adjacent Kg Pgkln Nangka
MikeN (2022-07-14 13:56:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM!   Please use meaningful changeset comments - "stuff" does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Glassman (2022-07-15 21:35:41+00:00): I used to work with these MW sites for AT&T - but not sad to see them go.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123586260
nyampire (2022-07-15 02:34:39+00:00): OSMへようこそ！
編集をレビューしました。問題ありません！
ぜひ、あなたがご存知のことを、また追加してみてください。Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123586262
user_5359 (2022-07-15 09:51:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9886297159. what is the correct street name?
charles chilufya (2022-07-14 20:03:46+00:00): @Fatness,
hi i am just being curious about tagging foundations= buildings/yes instead of building= constructions. make sure also to finish mapping everything before marking as finished completely
charles chilufya (2022-07-14 20:04:25+00:00): @shadrick,
hi i am just being curious about tagging foundations= buildings/yes instead of building= constructions. make sure also to finish mapping everything before marking as finished completely
BCNorwich (2022-07-15 09:39:34+00:00): Hi, You created a lot of duplicated highways by placing one roar on top of an existing road. I think I've corrected all the problems.
Carlos Brys (2022-07-14 11:32:13+00:00): Buenos días
OpenStreetMap es un mapa comunitario donde se registran datos de inererés general.
No está permitido grabar datos personales, por lo cual su contribución ha sido eliminada
mapper03 (2022-07-14 04:08:16+00:00): please help to explain why downgrade Manila-Cavite road into just tertiary road instead of secondary road, whereas it is the primary road in going to Cavite City
mapper03 (2022-07-14 04:22:37+00:00): also please justify your unnecessary downgrades of roads just as TagaSanPedroAko explains in his edits. please do not edit maps without proper justification.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
stevea (2022-07-16 21:10:16+00:00): Thanks; this section is sometimes called "the bypass" and expressway=yes is correct.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-19 14:21:48+00:00): Just checking - should https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1058587135 be primary or secondary?  I've tried to revert the DRPS PHCA changes but it failed here (and on some others) because a later change had already been made.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-07-14 13:49:59+00:00): Bonjour! Il existe un décalage de X/East: 0.6m, Y/North: -1.54m entre les photos aériennes de Bing et les bornes géodésiques officielles du Québec dans la région de Montréal. Est-ce possible de déplacer vos buildings avec cet offset (0.6, -1.54)?

Merci!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-07-14 13:50:48+00:00): Pour les prochains imports, vous pouvez sélectionner cet offset dans JSOM, dans Imagery/New Offset: 0.6;-1.54
Graptemys (2022-07-20 17:43:28+00:00): Okay I fixed it!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-07-20 18:58:26+00:00): Thanks!
Friendly_Ghost (2022-12-30 14:43:51+00:00): Why did you remove the address tags from the businesses?
addr2osm (2022-12-30 16:24:29+00:00): This changeset was a monthly update for the Norwegian address import. The Norwegian community decided for the import to have address tags on separate nodes.

More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Address_import_for_Norway
❤️‍🔥 (2022-07-14 05:50:14+00:00): Hi, it seems like the map you linked to is wrong.... The new signage says this section is SH 3, not 1C (see https://youtu.be/hG9YGKTTp1g?t=1532 for example, which is looking south from https://osm.org/node/3026976866)
HLZ (2022-07-14 09:17:18+00:00): Yeah good point.  Very confusing, if SH 1C finishes at Ohaupo Road it’s a fairly short state highway! Then again I see your point with the signage and based on what NZTA have been saying for 6+ years it looks like this section will be SH3. The latest map they put out must be wrong.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-07-14 11:21:31+00:00): weird... I've changed it back for now since the actual signs say it's SH 3
HLZ (2022-07-14 12:30:38+00:00): Hmmm not sure, just been for a drive on the new road and all of the signs heading northbound on the new Hamilton section say 1C, maybe the gantry sign is out of date and has since been changed?
lcmortensen (2022-07-15 04:52:31+00:00): Have contacted NZTA via Facebook and the confirm it should be 1C and the southbound gantry sign is wrong.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-07-15 05:29:30+00:00): lol... that gantry sign was only installed a few weeks ago 👀 can you or someone else change it back to 1C please? I won't have wifi until next friday
lcmortensen (2022-07-15 07:18:51+00:00): Done = https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123633677
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-08 11:25:25+00:00): Is leaving addr:housename in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3594169502/history intentional? Is it really part of address? If yes, then removing other address parts was wrong

If that is not an address - then it should be retagged, probably to name tag or removed
addr2osm (2022-09-08 14:02:05+00:00): The addr:housename tag "Globusgården" is the (apparently well known) name of the building. It is not part of the address (the official address in public records is here: https://seeiendom.kartverket.no/eiendom/3005/110/606/0/0 under the Adresser section). Addresses in Norway consist of 1) the street name, 2) the house number, 3) the postal code, and 4) the post district/city.

In general, the addr:housename tag is kept in such cases in order to preserve the information provided by another user. In this case the name tag was already used for a different purpose.

Users often put the name of buildings in the addr:housename tag for this reason, or because they think this is how to tag the name of a building.

In this particular case, "Globusgården" is already tagged on the building way, so it may be removed on this node.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-08 14:25:22+00:00): > In this particular case, "Globusgården" is already tagged on the building way, so it may be removed on this node.

I did this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125945975
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-13 10:16:53+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3439987 ?
DeBigC (2022-12-10 17:53:04+00:00): I'm intrigued by the shape of the windfarm. It doesn't relate to any extant fence, hedge or subdivision. I see it also says "proposed", so should we have it on the map until it is there?
VictorIE (2022-12-11 01:33:36+00:00): The shape follows the location for the proposed wind turbines (also marked).

Construction is actually nearing completion.

"proposed" is a documented category. It's for things that have some basis, e.g. planning permission, not just a press release or someone's crayon drawings.
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-07-14 21:19:43+00:00): Lucena is still capital of Quezon Province (admin_level=4), but it's no longer under its jurisdiction (Lucena is highly urbanized city). Please undo.
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-07-14 21:22:22+00:00): Geographically speaking, it's still part of Quezon Province, but the admin_level tag speaks about political territory. Lucena is not under Quezon Province jurisdiction, even if it's still the capital.
DP24PH (2022-07-18 11:24:37+00:00): Unfortunately, I disagree with your changes for Lucena City since it is declared a Highly Urbanized City, and it is considered an independent city (hence disqualified to be part of the provincial jurisdiction). I'll revert this immediately upon notice.


DP24
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-07-14 21:10:51+00:00): The bypass is still relatively new and most traffic is bus or truck, but whether trunk should be moved back to Poblacion route needs to be discussed first.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-07 09:04:35+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3349271 ?
tastrax (2022-07-15 02:43:39+00:00): Thanks for editing those buildings to a better outline. You can also 'square' the corners of buildings using the Q key on your keyboard
CloCkWeRX (2022-07-15 12:10:36+00:00): Be aware as well of the offset. In ID, hit B (Background), and drag the control for offset until the roads and buildings all align.
Chances are; what might look like it has a bad offset right now aligns fairly well.
Tomas Straupis (2022-07-14 15:43:11+00:00): Pagal oficialius topografinius duomenis - yra. Tai viena iš trijų šio tvenkinio dalių. Užtvanka nebūtinai turi būti betoninė ar kaip kitaip ryškiai matoma. Tiesiog vandens lygis vakarinėje dalyje turi būti aukštesnis už rytinėje pusėje esantį, na ir „nukasus“ šitą užtvanką vandens lygis turėtų nukristi. Bet aš ne vietinis, tai atgal nenoriu keisti, nes na gal tikrai ten kažkaip kitaip viskas :-)
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 18:34:16+00:00): Can you be more specific? What errors did you fix?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
eggie (2022-07-14 07:22:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Een wegafsluiting doen we op een andere manier. 

Hoe lang gaat de wegafsluiting duren?

Er ligt hier een betonblok.
Daar zou je ook de accesstags kunnen opzetten.
Het is dus zaak om het betonblok in te tekenen met barrier=block

En dan voor de duidelijkheid 
motor_vehicle=no
bicycle=yes
moped=yes
mofa=yes
foot=yes  
en wellicht motorcycle=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dblock

Een stukje apart mappen met access=no wordt niet meer opgemerkt later en blijft soms maanden onnodig op slot staan.

MVG
eggie


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-14 07:26:16+00:00): Kennelijk is dit deel van de weg gereed, maar je hebt proposed=unclassified nog staan?
Dat betekent dat er plannen zijn om een weg aan te leggen. Die regel 'moet' dan weg.
eggie
eggie (2022-07-14 07:28:26+00:00): De wegen zitten niet aan elkaar op de Boksumerdijk
warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway

Kijk steeds goed of je niet een waarschuwing krijgt bij uploaden.
eggie
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-07-14 21:03:50+00:00): Fewer vehicles taking the bypass talaga?
DP24PH (2022-07-16 08:53:36+00:00): FALSE. All through traffic uses the bypass road to deter downtown (bayan/poblacion) congestion, as previous reversion could contradict the DPWH guidelines on utilizing the bypass/diversion roadways available. Likewise, all trucks are banned from entering the downtown/bayan portions.


DP24
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-14 19:17:19+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
eggie (2022-07-14 07:31:12+00:00): Ook hier nog stukjes proposed  Verbinding Parkeerveld met Redbadwei. Kijk nog eens goed
SzymonH (2022-07-14 07:37:15+00:00): https://skrzynki.poczta-polska.pl/
Potwierdzam, najbliższe są przy okolicznych placówkach pocztowych.
eggie (2022-07-14 07:35:34+00:00): Mapper E de Wit had proposed =service getagd. Je maakt er een residential van, maar er staan geen woningen. 
Wegen op een parkeerterrein zijn highway=service met evt service=parking_aisle
Wanneer het hier gereed is moet proposed weg.
Kijk steeds naar de bedoeling van de voorgaande mapper. Wanneer er staat propose= de keuze.. dan zou het wel eens de juiste tag kunnen zijn.

Verder drie waarschuwingen.
kuisende en losliggende  wegen .
Dus nog even wat werk aan de winkel.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-07-14 07:37:52+00:00): Hoe komt autoverkeer op het parkeerveld als het van alle kanten is afgesloten of is dat voor de medewerkers in de bouw.
eggie (2022-07-14 07:46:06+00:00): Ik heb wat genoemde foutjes verbeterd. Alle begin is moeilijk. Veel plezier met mappen.
Je kunt hier je hart ophalen.
Vraag evt. hulp aan de voorgaande en ervaren lokale mapper E. de Wit https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/E%20de%20Wit
Die zal vast wel willen helpen en weet van de hoed en de rand hier.
Veel plezier met mappen. 
gr eggie
mueschel (2022-07-29 18:21:37+00:00): Hi,
please check this node. It didn't get any valid tag apart from 'name':
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9886560853
Hb- (2024-12-19 23:20:36+00:00): Ich stelle gerade fest, das irgendjemand in Müllershausen alle Häuser größer Nr. 10 gelöscht hat. Dies muss vor dem 1. Dezember 2024 erfolgt sein. Mapillary hat noch die ganzen Gebäude im Hintergrund. Vielleicht findest Du einen Deiner Änderungssätze, mit dem die nun gelöschten Gebäude eingezeichnet worden waren.
whb (2024-12-22 13:16:20+00:00): Guten Tag,

die hier auf der Mapillary-Basemap sichtbaren Gebäude waren nie in OSM:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.78118&lng=9.93552&z=17&mapStyle=Mapillary+light

Mapillary verwendet inzwischen eine eigene Karte (Basemap), welche neben OSM-Daten auch andere Daten enthält:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/overture-maps-first-dataset-release/101702/81

Bei den betreffenden Gebäuden handelt es sich um KI-generierte Gebäudeumrisse von Microsoft (eher mittelmäßige Qualität):
https://github.com/microsoft/GlobalMLBuildingFootprints

Diese sind auch hier im Rapid-Editor in violett zu sehen:
https://rapideditor.org/edit#map=18/51.78118/9.93552&background=Bing&datasets=msBuildings&disable_features=boundaries

Viele Grüße
whb
Hb- (2024-12-23 07:46:27+00:00): Danke.
Tresho (2022-07-15 08:15:42+00:00): Ciao Giovanni,
ti do due piccoli suggerimenti:
il tag name deve contenere un nome effettivo e non un nome generico, una descrizione o delle indicazioni.
Quindi il nome del sentiero che c'era prima è più corretto.
Inoltre per migliorare agli altri mappatori la comprensione delle tue modifiche è bene descriverle brevemente nel campo commenti quando salvi.
Se hai delle domande rispondimi pure qua sotto.

Matteo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123593549
luiswoo (2022-07-14 10:33:34+00:00): адрес пишется полностью: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU:Addresses&uselang=ru
tux67 (2022-07-14 12:09:24+00:00): Hallo M_B_Schuster,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest, die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Welche Schilder stehen denn vor Ort. Wir mappen nur, was explizit ausgeschildert ist. 
living_street bekommt ohne ein Tempolimitschild kein Tempolimit. access=private ist in einem Wohngebiet unwahrscheinlich. 
Ich nehme mal an da steht ein https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=325
Nach deinem Mapping müsste da aber auch noch ein https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=250,1020-12,257-51 stehen?
Nicht vorhandene, sondern nur angenommene Zugangsbeschränkungen werden NICHT gemappt.
Prima, dass du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Bitte gib aber auch immer die Quelle eines Wissens an.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung, an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - IMMER hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
tux67 (2022-07-14 12:19:37+00:00): Zutrittsbeschränkungedn werden duch access rights ausgedrückt.
Definitiv wird das Name Tag nur für wirkliche Namen eingesetzt.
Ich würde dringend raten zu allen neu eingesetzten Tags etwas im Wiki zu lesen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
VLD166 (2022-08-25 19:01:41+00:00): Hello Mapper,
I'm working on a project that aims to remove vandalism and profanity from the map. 
I know mountain bikers like to add fun names for their trails. However, the name of this cycleway seems inappropriate. Is this in fact the common name for this trail?
VLD166 (2022-08-25 19:07:24+00:00): Here's the OSM Wiki page related to the project: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/Facebook#Profanity_Cleanup
nevw (2022-08-26 01:10:49+00:00): There are a few others in this area that need fixing.
user_12592524 (2022-08-26 02:13:30+00:00): Good on you! Great to see that a non offensive name applied to something that has nothing to do with you as a meta data object in a virtual environment is something that has you working on a project that aims to remove vandalism and profanity from. Is this your only hobby? Think about the activities that are going on in the real world at this local, and the name and review of your concern is warranted.
eggie (2022-07-14 08:32:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-14 10:49:20+00:00): PB contact.. 
Advies gegeven om contact met het forum van OSM op te nemen.
eggie
Supaplex030 (2022-07-14 19:03:32+00:00): "crossing:kerb_extension" ist eigentlich nur an den crossing-Punkten sinnvoll anwendbar, weil "left"/"right"/"both" ja richtungsspezifisch ist und hier an so einem Weg nicht interpretierbar ist, oder was meinst du?
Supaplex030 (2022-07-14 19:04:20+00:00): (Abgesehen davon, dass es eine Doppel-Info ist, aber das Problem haben wir bei manchen anderen crossing-Tagging-Konstruktionen auch...)
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-07-24 17:05:05+00:00): 朋友你好，你的这个编辑错误的将北京从地图上移除，我已在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124017559 中将其回退，望您之后在编辑中更仔细谨慎。感谢理解。