piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LuizF23 (2021-04-13 12:31:43+00:00): Em relação as vias fui ajeitar o circulo da via e arrastar as rotas que estavam um pouco desalinhadas e esqueci de adicionar novamente estarei ajeitando agora, entretanto aos prédios eu adicionei conforme no MAPA, você mora por lá pra me dizer se ainda existe ou não por que no mapa SATÉLITE estão lá.
treestryder (2022-12-15 01:55:38+00:00): Found this a year later, but this was correctly tagged as highway=path

A cycleway is only for bicycles (and implies a more freeway like experience).
Have a look at the following pages:
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Common_Tagging_Schemes
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

Also see the Michigan Wikipage for information about our monthly meetings.
eggie (2021-04-12 21:17:13+00:00): Beste RHJM
Wanneer een school verdwijnt haal in het vervolg alleen de schoolinfo van de node, maar laat de adresnode intact.
Het adres moet toch vindbaar blijven?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-12 21:18:12+00:00): Het adres heb ik weer hersteld. 
gr eggie
lectrician1 (2021-04-13 00:03:55+00:00): Please do not make huge changesets across a large area.
eggie (2021-04-12 21:09:56+00:00): Netjes ingetekend, maar..... 
Dit kan beter via import.
Zie forumdraadje Verzoek BAG import
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Wanneer je veel ervaring hebt kun je ook zelf importeren vanuit de BAG
gr eggie
5m4u9 (2021-04-13 03:28:56+00:00): hmm... I think area should be deleted instead of the node, because the residential area does not cover all the houses. Combuyo like other villages does not have a defined area, it is an ambiguous and overlaps with  neighboring villages.
afk2019 (2021-04-13 11:09:49+00:00): I get your point. I would like to keep the area though, because it is the center of the village and changes in the area would help track urbanisation of semi-rural/peripheral communities.

Is it possible to relate the area, without attributes, to the node, which keeps the attributes. Then I would revert this change, clear the attributes of the area and make a realtion (how) from the area to the node, which provides the attributes such as name, population etc.
afk2019 (2021-04-13 11:11:06+00:00): Sorry, the first sentence of my second paragraph was meant to be a question:
"Is it possible to relate the area, without attributes, to the node, which keeps the attributes?"
eggie (2021-04-12 21:06:45+00:00): Dag RHJM.. Eigenlijk tekenen we geen woningen meer in.
We importeren periodiek. Je kunt dar versnellen door een verzoek te doen op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
Ook geen adresinfo op de gebouwomtrek zetten.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Inlog identiek aan OSM account
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-12 21:29:49+00:00): Even als voorbeeld aangevraagd https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=826123#p826123
Rainero (2021-04-13 09:08:30+00:00): Hallo 0tten24,
Polarbear-repair hat dich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102750151 darüber informiert, dass er die lokale OSM-Community um Überprüfung gebeten hat, was ein Park ist.

Hast du dir die dort verlinkte Seite über Mapping für Pokemon Go mal durchgelesen?
Es ist willkommen, wenn du durch das Spiel motiviert bist Dinge, die fehlen, in OSM zu ergänzen.
Wenn du aber existierende Daten nur so manipulierst, dass du in Pokemon Go bessere Möglichkeiten hast, ist das im OSM-Projekt unerwünscht.
Eine Kleingartenanlage ist in OSM 
landuse=allotments.
Ein zusätzliches leisure=park ist falsch. 
Das sieht so aus, als ob deine Änderung rein unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Manipulation für Pokemon Go erfolgt.
Das muß wieder entfernt werden.

Gruß,
Rainer
Allison P (2021-04-12 22:24:11+00:00): I think 1107 may be the address for the fire hose hookup which is attached to the building.
LarkH (2021-04-12 21:07:17+00:00): I did not mean to change this on the entire OpenStreetMap........
UPK (2021-04-25 11:56:50+00:00): kein post_box:type "lamp" sondern "pillar", da es sich um eine Briefkasten-Säule handelt.
Stadtbahnfan1985 (2021-04-25 20:24:05+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, mein Fehler.
ottwiz (2021-04-12 21:14:01+00:00): I created bunch of nodes aka untagged way, which will make a forest, but i don't have time to finish it since i have to go to bed. it's 23:12 here and yeah xd just i wanted to upload the changeset before random mappers come and map some driveways, so that my mapping is getting f'd up aka conflicts with other changes.
I also marked on the untagged way that do not remove. Thanks for your understanding.
syntex (2021-04-15 00:59:59+00:00): Wygląda to nieźle
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2021-04-15 07:15:35+00:00): Dziękuję. Jeszcze chcę dodać pozostałe ciągi piesze.
trial (2021-05-08 21:03:04+00:00): Hi, sorry for the language. Can you confirm that the changeset below is vandalism? Even if I don't read Cyrillic, my understanding is that the bookshop and the stop had and probably should have the same name. Thanks in advance.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103055407
rthik007 (2021-04-15 06:27:19+00:00): Hi YENCHANGLU,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road .Kindly check with way 28104335.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28104335
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102828709
xmd5a (2021-04-13 07:10:57+00:00): Доброе утро. В OSM нельзя вносить данные из источников, которые не давали разрешения на это. К ним относится и ПКК, кроме некоторых слоёв. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%9F%D1%83%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D0%B0
В OSM достаточно строго следят за лицензионной чистотой данных. Вот здесь написано что можно, а что нельзя: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57586
(разрешение на использование некоторых слоёв ПКК появилось совсем недавно).
WANTES (2021-04-13 07:49:18+00:00): Понял, можете удалить  тогда правки. Внесу их по правилам.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-04-13 13:02:38+00:00): Please connect sidewalks to streets using crossing and don't connect landuse to sidewalks. Correct tags for sidewalks in Quebec are: 
highway=footway
footway=sidewalk
bicycle=no 
or 
bicycle=dismount for small segments that connect cycling paths together.
andrewwiseman (2021-04-12 22:08:55+00:00): Hi, thank you for mapping on this project! It looks like your organization is doing a large mapping event, which is great, but some mappers on your team are making a number of mistakes and mapping on projects that are not great for beginner mappers. Can you or your organizers either respond to this message or please email partnerships@hotosm.org which is the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, they can help your event organizers with trainings and best practices to make sure your volunteers are creating good map data.

For example, mappers using #gomicron21 and related comments are adding duplicate roads where roads already exist, connecting buildings to roads or overlapping roads, not squaring the corners of buildings by clicking the q key on your keyboard, not connecting roads to other roads that should be connected, and mapping roads with the incorrect classification — most roads that are missing will be residential, unclassified or track, but some mappers are adding them as “motorway” which is only correct for large, divided, controlled access freeways. I recommend you look at https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ to learn how to map, as well as mapping on beginner projects that are buildings-only, those are best for new mappers.

Also please remind mappers to look at the left side of the screen when saving their edits, if there are any red or yellow messages, those are errors that the mappers should fix before they upload the data.

Thank you.
andrewwiseman (2021-04-12 22:06:21+00:00): Hi, thank you for mapping on this project! It looks like your organization is doing a large mapping event, which is great, but some mappers on your team are making a number of mistakes and mapping on projects that are not great for beginner mappers. Can you or your organizers either respond to this message or please email partnerships@hotosm.org which is the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, they can help your event organizers with trainings and best practices to make sure your volunteers are creating good map data.

For example, mappers using #gomicron21 and related comments are adding duplicate roads where roads already exist, connecting buildings to roads or overlapping roads, not squaring the corners of buildings by clicking the q key on your keyboard, not connecting roads to other roads that should be connected, and mapping roads with the incorrect classification — most roads that are missing will be residential, unclassified or track, but some mappers are adding them as “motorway” which is only correct for large, divided, controlled access freeways. I recommend you look at https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ to learn how to map, as well as mapping on beginner projects that are buildings-only, those are best for new mappers.

Also please remind mappers to look at the left side of the screen when saving their edits, if there are any red or yellow messages, those are errors that the mappers should fix before they upload the data.

Thank you.
andrewwiseman (2021-04-12 22:06:17+00:00): Hi, thank you for mapping on this project! It looks like your organization is doing a large mapping event, which is great, but some mappers on your team are making a number of mistakes and mapping on projects that are not great for beginner mappers. Can you or your organizers either respond to this message or please email partnerships@hotosm.org which is the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, they can help your event organizers with trainings and best practices to make sure your volunteers are creating good map data.

For example, mappers using #gomicron21 and related comments are adding duplicate roads where roads already exist, connecting buildings to roads or overlapping roads, not squaring the corners of buildings by clicking the q key on your keyboard, not connecting roads to other roads that should be connected, and mapping roads with the incorrect classification — most roads that are missing will be residential, unclassified or track, but some mappers are adding them as “motorway” which is only correct for large, divided, controlled access freeways. I recommend you look at https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ to learn how to map, as well as mapping on beginner projects that are buildings-only, those are best for new mappers.

Also please remind mappers to look at the left side of the screen when saving their edits, if there are any red or yellow messages, those are errors that the mappers should fix before they upload the data.

Thank you.
andrewwiseman (2021-04-12 22:06:47+00:00): Hi, thank you for mapping on this project! It looks like your organization is doing a large mapping event, which is great, but some mappers on your team are making a number of mistakes and mapping on projects that are not great for beginner mappers. Can you or your organizers either respond to this message or please email partnerships@hotosm.org which is the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, they can help your event organizers with trainings and best practices to make sure your volunteers are creating good map data.

For example, mappers using #gomicron21 and related comments are adding duplicate roads where roads already exist, connecting buildings to roads or overlapping roads, not squaring the corners of buildings by clicking the q key on your keyboard, not connecting roads to other roads that should be connected, and mapping roads with the incorrect classification — most roads that are missing will be residential, unclassified or track, but some mappers are adding them as “motorway” which is only correct for large, divided, controlled access freeways. I recommend you look at https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ to learn how to map, as well as mapping on beginner projects that are buildings-only, those are best for new mappers.

Also please remind mappers to look at the left side of the screen when saving their edits, if there are any red or yellow messages, those are errors that the mappers should fix before they upload the data.

Thank you.
Dodko (2021-08-02 12:48:14+00:00): Táto budova je zbúraná?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66345169/history

Ani jej nezrušili adresu, ale pridali orientačné číslo.
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/adresne-body/0/19348664?pos=48.546403,20.401774,19
Filip009 (2021-08-02 13:24:54+00:00): Áno,  je zbúraná.
andrewwiseman (2021-04-12 22:13:20+00:00): Hi, thank you for mapping on this project! It looks like your organization is doing a large mapping event, which is great, but some mappers on your team are making a number of mistakes and mapping on projects that are not great for beginner mappers. Can you or your organizers either respond to this message or please email partnerships@hotosm.org which is the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, they can help your event organizers with trainings and best practices to make sure your volunteers are creating good map data.

For example, mappers using #gomicron21 and related comments are adding duplicate roads where roads already exist, connecting buildings to roads or overlapping roads, not squaring the corners of buildings by clicking the q key on your keyboard, not connecting roads to other roads that should be connected, and mapping roads with the incorrect classification — most roads that are missing will be residential, unclassified or track, but some mappers are adding them as “motorway” which is only correct for large, divided, controlled access freeways. I recommend you look at https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ to learn how to map, as well as mapping on beginner projects that are buildings-only, those are best for new mappers.

Also please remind mappers to look at the left side of the screen when saving their edits, if there are any red or yellow messages, those are errors that the mappers should fix before they upload the data.

Thank you.
tastrax (2021-05-07 07:57:33+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
map per (2021-04-18 09:03:06+00:00): Hallo Strubbl,

ich finde, dass man an Ausfahrten keine Fußgänger- /Radfahrerübergänge einzeichnen sollte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8618936628).

Viele Grüße
map per
Strubbl (2021-04-18 09:17:04+00:00): Hallo map per, 

das ist okay, dass du das so findest. Wie begründest du das? Der iD macht mich darauf aufmerksam, dass das ein Datenproblem sei und man dort einen Übergang einzeichnen soll. Deswegen habe ich die direkt eingetragen.

Viele Grüße
map per (2021-04-18 09:44:39+00:00): "Der iD macht mich darauf aufmerksam, dass das ein Datenproblem sei und man dort einen Übergang einzeichnen soll." Das hört sich komisch an. Hat sich ID vielleich nur darüber beschwert, das die Wege sich kreuzen, ohne in einem Punkt verbunden zu sein?
Strubbl (2021-04-18 10:47:25+00:00): Oh, das könnte sein. Ich habe nur gesehen, dass iD dort automatisch crossings hinmacht und dachte das sei so gewollt. Ich beobachte das nochmal genauer in welchen Fällen der die hinzufügt.
Strubbl (2021-04-18 11:53:04+00:00): Ja, wenn man mit iD das Datenproblem automatisch behebt setzt iD ein hw=crossing auf den kreuzenden Node. Das ist wohl fälschlich so.

Ich habe mal eine Overpass Query gebaut.

Und ich würde dann mal über alle diese Nodes gehen und dort, wo es nicht mehr sinnvoll ist, das hw=crossing rausnehmen. Also bei fast allen Treffern.

Danke auf jeden Fall für das hinweisen. Das habe ich falsch interpretiert von iD.

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/16iY
Strubbl (2021-04-18 12:00:39+00:00): Desweiteren habe ich mich mal einem Bugreport für iD versucht: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8463
Strubbl (2021-04-18 12:19:02+00:00): Der erste CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103134848 beginnt schon mal damit, das rückgängig zu machen.
Strubbl (2021-04-18 12:36:48+00:00): Weil ich gerne etwas mehr Klarheit haben würde, wann hw=crossing zu setzen ist, habe ich zu allem auch noch den Forumsthread https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=826765 eröffnet
map per (2021-04-18 12:41:38+00:00): Gute Idee, das ist ja im Wiki nicht so klar beschrieben.
LySioS (2021-04-12 23:47:27+00:00): Les grands esprits se rencontrent. Je venais justement de tomber sur cette carte et comptais m'en servir pour les quartiers !
https://www.ville-cabestany.fr/application/files/2915/0347/4012/15_plan_ville_proprete.jpg
hoancat (2021-04-13 10:42:59+00:00): Bien vu mais pour le tracé je me suis basé sur les panneaux de quartier car cette carte n'inclut pas l'Impasse del Sarrat dans La Colline, ce que je trouvais étrange.
J'avais aussi trouvé cette carte https://www.ville-cabestany.fr/fr/cadre-de-vie/collecte-dechets/presentation-de-lurbanisme-2-2
J'ai des doutes sur la ZA Ambroise Croizat et la rue Madeleine Brès qui diffèrent selon les versions et Les Portes de la Mer visibles nulle part.
Il faut attendre une nouvelle version de la part de la mairie pour être sûr.
LySioS (2021-04-13 20:35:19+00:00): Comme toi, je pense que les portes de la mer vont avec Mas Ferrer. Par contre, sur nos 2 cartes, Madeleine Brès fait bien partie de médipôle. Je ne l'ai vu dans mas anglade que sur les cartes affichées dans la rue.
Question pratique :

* tu as laissé les points quartiers, est-ce normal ?
* pourquoi tu as fait des segments indépendants dans des relations ? Ce n'aurait pas été plus simple de faire un polygone pour chaque quartier ?
hoancat (2021-04-13 22:30:51+00:00): J'ai modifié les quartiers Mas Anglade et Médipole : j'ai mis les commerces et la rue Madeleine Brès dans le quartier Médipole.
Le wiki Tag:place=quarter indique pour ceux qui souhaitent cartographier les quartiers en polygones : « Many mappers also add a node tagged place=quarter at the center of the area to assist routing applications. »
Les segments indépendants dans des relations, c'est parce que JOSM m'indiquait les polygones comme chemins superposés. J'ai résolu ce problème avec le greffon reltoolbox et ça donné ce résultat.
user_5359 (2021-04-13 04:00:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between description and name. You didn't need a tag name=playground if you has the tag leisure=playground (for example)

By the way a single tree isn't a forest / wood.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 12:00:39+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-04-13 12:17:20+00:00): Luiz voce adicionou ao mapa coisas que nem existem na realidade como isso aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929933085
LuizF23 (2021-04-13 12:40:58+00:00): Não entendi... Adicionei coisas que estao no MAPA e algumas casas que sei que existem pois já fui nos locais, onde não fui adicionei conforme no MAPA SATELITE.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-04-13 12:45:38+00:00): luiz, me desculpe se confundi, eu estava falando só dessa construção aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=929933085#map=21/-10.16804/-67.71722
LuizF23 (2021-04-13 12:48:44+00:00): Tudo joia relaxe, acredito que essa construção seja daquelas suspensas pra observar o lago (é o que parece no mapa) mas não tenho certeza.
ovruni (2021-04-12 22:57:27+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiado las vías a highway=living_street en vías con un ancho angosto. Sin embargo esta etiqueta esta destinada para calles residenciales que tienen un limite de velocidad reducido. [0]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
ovruni (2021-04-12 22:49:37+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM, he notado que en algunos de sus conjuntos de cambios se han borrado vías para volver a crear otras similares, esto hace que se pierda el historial de las mismas. por otra parte, su texto en el conjunto de cambios no refleja lo que se ha realizado en el mismo, por favor revisar sobre los buenos conjuntos de cambios [1].
Saludos
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
DaveF (2021-05-10 15:37:24+00:00): 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193979228/history
Hi 
There is no need to add any highway tags to railway platforms as their raison d'etre is to be walked on.
Kovoschiz (2021-04-13 05:19:36+00:00): This looks like a broken u-turn restriction.
Pakuhi_Ahi (2021-04-13 22:18:30+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz, thank you for fixing this with the appropriate relation. Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 23:51:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103555949, 103556399 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
PlaneMad (2021-09-03 18:55:53+00:00): Many thanks for the amazing updates in the Himalayan region. 

Theres 2.6k places with name=Unknown . https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1aS8

Unknown is not a valid name value and should likely be removed. Let me know if this is ok and am happy to delete them.
Peter Van Geit (2021-09-03 19:39:49+00:00): The "unknown" hamlets/villages/dwellings are verified either in field while hiking or satellite map. I gave them name=Unknown so that they would be visible on the map. Any other suggestion to keep them visible?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 23:51:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103555949, 103556399 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
bekimMK (2021-04-14 00:39:44+00:00): Dies ist der richtige Pfad. Bitte aktualisieren Sie ihn, sobald er mit Navigation angeboten wird.
Horza (2021-04-14 22:02:15+00:00): Hi,

Please use Q to square buildings add. Please try to match the outline you are adding to the shape of the building at ground level whilst avoiding mapping shadows or artefacts due to image angle.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling

Goes into depth if you want to read more about how to map buildings accurately.

Thanks,
Horza
Becky Candy (2021-04-30 11:31:17+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102832750
Palolo (2021-04-13 02:53:33+00:00): Thank you for helping on the project in Tanzania.
Please read the instructions and look over the training materials to learn how to map buildings properly.
Thanks