piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-09 05:27:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
Syl (2022-04-08 22:15:20+00:00): Bonjour, après quelques recherches ça a l'air d'être le nom donné au quartier : https://www.lanouvellerepublique.fr/la-chatre/le-p-tit-mur-reste-un-quartier-charge-d-histoire
Du coup village n'est effectivement pas adapté, à voir quel type de lieu conviendrait mieux.
peyot (2022-04-09 13:47:36+00:00): Après quelques recherches, cela ne semble pas être très utilisé ni très important. Il faudrait donc utiliser la clé "place:quarter" ou "place:neighbourhood"

Sur la page wikipedia de la commune, il est dit "Les hameaux et lieux-dits de la commune sont : les Grandes Bordes, Vavre et les Echambons".

Sur le site de la commune, j'ai trouvé un article parlant d'une division en 8 quartiers (https://www.lachatre.fr/2019/04/09/grand-retour-des-reunions-de-quartiers/)
peyot (2022-04-16 14:47:20+00:00): C'est remis. Cordialement
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Syl (2022-05-24 08:30:51+00:00): Bonjour, la cabine téléphonique fonctionne toujours ?
Koreller (2022-05-24 16:01:52+00:00): Oui, des usagers l'utilisent encore
Syl (2022-05-25 06:15:34+00:00): Ok merci, c'est une cabine toujours gérée par Orange ?
Koreller (2022-05-30 15:44:00+00:00): À priori non, je n'ai rien trouvé de ce genre l'indiquant à l'intérieur (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Int%C3%A9rieur_cabine_t%C3%A9l%C3%A9phonique_Vertou,_France.jpg)
Syl (2022-06-07 12:12:14+00:00): Merci pour les précisions et pour la photo, je viens de les ajouter dans OSM.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Leo Slager (2022-04-08 23:01:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-09 05:26:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/49438643/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
b-holdet (2022-04-09 05:15:33+00:00): Hej Jørn,

Kan du ikke fortælle mig, hvorfor du bliver ved med at slette adresseoplysningerne på POI?

Gerne med en henvisning til Wiki eller noget andet.

Du kan også svare på Talk, hvor jeg har stillet samme spørgsmål.

Med venlig hilsen
Flemming
Jørn-osm (2022-04-09 09:59:13+00:00): Alle danske adresser i OSM bliver automatisk opdateret.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/autoAWS

En adresse i Danmark er et punkt. Altså ikke flere punkter eller et areal.
b-holdet (2022-04-09 18:35:36+00:00): Som jeg kan se det, så er det opdateringer af følgende noder:

"Address data from OSM is compared with address data from DAR using SQL. The two database tables are joined on the osak:identifier=* key."

Da POI ikke har "osak:identifier=*" sat på, så vil denne adresse ikke være en del af opdateringen. Derfor vil AWS-opdateringen fortsætte og POI vil være uændret. Og der vil derfor være ét punkt for den officielle adresse for stedet og ét punkt for POI med adresse på butikken.

Det er derfor jeg ikke mener at det er nødvendigt at slette adresser på POI, da de ikke indgår i AWS-opdateringen.
osmviborg (2022-04-09 20:20:58+00:00): Præcis derfor bør der kun være én node med adressen, den som autoAWS sætter, og vedligeholder. Flere noder med samme adresse er noget 'snavs', fordi kun den ene bliver vedligeholdt.
b-holdet (2022-04-09 20:31:59+00:00): På den måde kan ingen POI indeholde adressedata?
Det giver jo ingen mening i forhold til OSM's opbygning. AWS vedligeholder stadig dens egne data. Hvilke data POI indeholder skal høre til POI og der er adressen bl.a. med.
Hvordan vil I kunne trække information om en placering af en POI, hvis adressen ikke findes? Det er som at få serveret et stykke rugbrød uden pålæg.
b-holdet (2022-04-09 20:37:25+00:00): Ser man på wikien, så er det kun bygninger man ikke vil have adresser på i DK:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
b-holdet (2022-04-09 20:40:05+00:00): Og i wikien omkring shop:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

Der er adresse faktisk en af mulighederne. Så der er ikke rigtig noget argument for at slette adresserne på POI
osmviborg (2022-04-10 04:52:58+00:00): Hvis jeg i OsmAnd søger på 'Bruuns Antikvariat' for jeg at vide at butikken ligger på 'Herluf Trolles Gade 48, Aarhus'. Programmet associerer selv butik og adressepunkt.
b-holdet (2022-04-10 05:26:07+00:00): Hvis jeg i OSM søger på 'Bruuns Antikvariat', så får jeg 

"Boghandel Bruuns Antikvariat, Herluf Trolles Gade, Trøjborg, Aarhus Ø, Aarhus, Aarhus Kommune, 8000, Danmark"

Gadenavnet kom med her.

Så langt så godt. Nu skal jeg så blot finde ud af hvor på gaden jeg finder punktet. Havde det været Frederikssundsvej ved Kbh, så ville det tage lidt tid finde.

Et eller andet siger mig, at man skal have den rette søgemaskine, for at få kombineret POI og adressepunkt.

Kan jeg få dig til at søge på et andet antikvariat i nærheden nemlig 'Clemens Antikvariat' i OSMand? Dette punkt er der ikke rørt ved i 9 år.
Får du "Tordenskjoldsgade 59", så tilføjer OSMand selv info.

Hvis det er tilfældet, så skal du altså have adgang til Planet-filen, for at lave udtrækket af POI, da du skal kende det nærmeste adressepunkt for den søgte POI.
osmviborg (2022-04-10 07:22:16+00:00): Husk nu på at www.openstreetmap.org, og de søgemaskiner der er en del af websiden, _ikke_ er et slutbruger produkt. Websiden er et værktøj til dig og mig som bidragydere. 'OsmAnd' er et slutbrugerprodukt, OSM er en database.
b-holdet (2022-04-10 16:48:12+00:00): Ja og netop derfor bør POI indeholde adresseoplysninger på databaseniveau.
POI er jo et objekt på linje med alle andre objekter i databasen og egenskaben Adresse er en af dem, der kan gives til den.
Det kan ikke være slutbrugeren, der efter at have fundet sit POI, skal skifte til en anden applikation for at finde flere oplysninger.
Jo flere enkeltoplysninger, der kan findes i et POI, jo enklere er det for applikationerne at finde eks. adressen.
Eks. http://openpoimap.org/ som viser POI udfra OSM-data. Kigger på i eks. Tyskland, så findes adressen også på POI-objektet. Tilsvarende er alle adresseoplysninger rydder i Danmark.
Så der er en tydelig afvigelse med POI-data i DK i forhold til resten af verden.
Jeg er stadig ikke overbevist, at metoden med at man i DK fjerne adresseoplysninger på POI giver nogen mening i forhold til OSM i det hele taget, eller om det er noget vi i DK er blevet "opdraget" til af en eller flere progressive mappere.
osmviborg (2022-04-11 05:34:26+00:00): De fleste brugere af OSM data er slutbrugere, slutbrugere bruger sjældent http://www.openstreetmap.org .
Danmark har verdens bedste system til adresse- opdatering. Begynder vi at tilføje adresser til andet end de adressepunkter som autoAWS sætter, og vedligeholder, degraderer vi kvaliteten på vores adressedata.
b-holdet (2022-04-12 05:02:52+00:00): Jeg ved du følger med på Talk og her kan du se at selv Lufthavnen ligger et forkert sted.
Almindelige brugere er derfor afhængig af datakvaliteten og uden adresseoplysninger i POI, så mangler disse data i applikationerne.
Det er stadig OSM der leverer data til brugerne.
osmviborg (2022-04-12 08:55:17+00:00): Jeg har, ligesom du, redegjort for de synspunkter omkring emnet som i min optik giver mening.
andershl (2022-04-17 16:41:53+00:00): Jørn: Du skal ikke egenhændigt sætte egne regler og slette andres korrekte oplysninger, som er indsat i overensstemmelse med almindelig praksis.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
jleedev (2022-04-12 02:02:38+00:00): It seems unlikely that you can drive a car from Lawn Street to Mackey Street, so I've changed this back.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-14 07:35:15+00:00): Why were the roads deleted?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
canfe (2022-04-09 10:47:57+00:00): Non penso sia un abbeveratoio per animali.
Forse intendevi roba così?
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1hwu
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119486590
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
archpdx (2022-04-09 06:54:25+00:00): Hi,
I think landuse=greenfield (https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:landuse%3Dgreenfield) makes more sense here as there isn't a fire station or water tower here yet. You can also use the lifecycle prefix 'proposed' (see https://wiki.osm.org/Lifecycle_prefix, for example 'proposed:amenity=fire_station'). The building tag on the fire station should also be removed as seems to be the outline of the landuse and not the building.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
luin132 (2022-04-08 22:13:36+00:00): Meant to say Source: INEGI:MGN:06-2018
Leo Slager (2022-04-09 09:51:43+00:00): name van de routerelation gewijzigd in N860.
Even nieuwsgierig zijn:
Ga je de bushaltes nog toevoegen ?