piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BeKri (2017-01-02 01:01:36+00:00): Servus,
Danke für Diene POI aber ein paar Anmerkungen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2288027737
Die Telefonnummer war schon richtig so, ich weiß nicht, warum Du sie in 089/225628 geändert hast.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone
Diese "weltweite" Schreibweise ist zwar auch nicht mein Ding, aber wenn es so war sollte es so bleiben.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4137360390
Straßen werden in München mit "ß" geschrieben, die vorherige Schreibweise hat also gestimmt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/340077209
Wie kommst Du darauf, daß
cuisine= italian	jetzt groß/"Italian" geschrieben wird ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/617149114
opening_hours= Mo-Th, Su 10:00-01:00, 10:00-03:00
was jetzt, 10-1 oder 10-3 ??? 
Auch hier ist mir NICHT klar, warum der vorherige Eintrag nicht stimmen soll.
Bitte noch mal überdenken
Gruss derBeKri
Tungmar (2017-01-03 11:40:09+00:00): Hallo
Danke für die Hinweise! Ich habe dies korrigiert (was noch nicht korrigiert war).
Ich hatte die Änderungen mit Osmand gemacht und eigentlich nur Werte ergänzt die dort fehlten. Offenbar wurde mir aber leider nicht alle angezeigt und ich habe die bestehenden überschrieben. Ich konnte noch nicht nachvollziehen wie das passiert ist, die Karte war zumindest die aktuellste.
Gruss und ein gutes neues Jahr
BeKri (2017-01-03 16:29:21+00:00): Servus samden,
Danke für Deine Reaktion,
Osmand ist eigentlich ganz ok,
vielleicht hat's sich "verschluckt" ;-)
Gruss und acuh gutes Neues
trial (2017-05-02 20:52:49+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez ajouté/mis-à-jour les "Statue Equestre" du Square Marc Sangnier. Ça me semble être une description et non leur nom (que je n'ai pas trouvé et je ne suis sur place pour vérifier). De plus les majuscules sont accentuées, ce serait donc Équestre.
De manière similaire le plan de ville n'a pas de nom (name à supprimer), ce que vous voulez dire c'est map_size=city et map_type=street (comme vous l'avez fait).
josmougn (2017-05-06 21:08:52+00:00): Je ne suis pas non plus sur place. J'ai mis ce nom descriptif en attendant que quelqu'un puisse mettre le vrai nom. Concernant le plan de ville, il est souvent écrit sur ces panneaux "plan de ville", ou bien l enom de la ville, ce qui en fait un nom.
letihu (2017-01-06 21:56:09+00:00): Der tag building:entrance ist veraltet und sollte nicht mehr verwendet werden.
Richtig ist entrance:yes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4584603750/history#map=19/52.91816/9.24692&layers=N
Hjart (2017-01-02 00:25:31+00:00): Was is upgraded recently?
nammala (2017-01-03 07:25:30+00:00): Hi velmyshanovnyi,

The edit you have made seems inappropriate. Please make sure not to do this bad stuff in the map. OpenStreetMap is the real map of the world with lot of quality data being added. Let us know if you need anything. I am going ahead and reverting the changeset.

Regards,
nammala
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-16 01:47:55+00:00): +1
joost schouppe (2017-01-02 17:35:09+00:00): Dag BMW,
Deze wegen waren gemapped als veldweg, wat impliceert dat ze niet bepaald bedoeld zijn om met de wagen te nemen. Doorgaans gaat een route-app die niet gebruiken. Als wagens niet toegelaten zijn, dan voegen we tags toe die aangeven dat motorvoertuigen niet toegestaan is. Enkel omdat de weg in de praktijk moeilijk toegangkelijk is met de wagen, is echter nog geen reden om er een paadje van te maken.

Daarnaast heeft de editor je een minder goede suggestie gedaan: je hebt de wegen aangeduid als een stoep, een voetpad bij een weg dus.

Daarnaast heb je [hier](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318139867#map=19/50.99246/4.56627) een poortje gewist en een pad rechtgetrokken dat er op de luchtfoto uitziet alsof het wel degelijk in een bocht ging.
escada (2017-01-02 19:58:18+00:00): Hallo BMW346i,

Bedankt dat je een probeert de paden in deze regio betere tags te geven.

Er zijn nu wel wat vreemde zaken, waar je misschien eens kan naar kijken en verder verbeteren.

bv. Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37997053 heeft een hele rare combinatie van tags.
highway=footway, wil sowieso zeggen dat andere vervoersmiddelen niet toegestaan zijn. Je kan dan wel nog anderen toevoegen via bv. bicycle=yes. Maar access=no of motor_vehicle=no is volledig overbodig.

En zoals Joost al aangaf, footway=sidewalk zet je enkel bij een stoep naast een rijweg. Bij voorkeur mappen we een stoep ook niet afzonderlijk. Er zijn dan allerlei problemen met het routeren als je dat wel doet.

Een echt verschil is er niet tussen highway=path;foot=yes en highway=footway.
Zelf geef ik er de voorkeur aan om highway=footway enkel te gebruiken als er een rond blauw  bord met een witte persoon bij staat.

Ik vind https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Eimai/Belgian_Roads#Paths een goede manier van werken.

Mocht je nog vragen of opmerkingen hebben, aarzel dan niet om ons te contacteren.

Nog veel plezier met het mappen.
joost schouppe (2017-01-02 17:42:29+00:00): And I hope this path actually exists :)

If this is the case, thanks! But please connect both ends to the road: our data isn't just for spawning, it's for navigating too. Unconnected paths are rather useless to help someone plan a route from A to B.
Thomas Freethy (2017-01-02 19:46:17+00:00): Yup! It exists, in fact this is only a small fraction of the bike path. I would like complete the path in the summer. For now I am just getting familiar with OpenStreetMap. Thanks for the feedback, I have connected both ends of the path to the road :)
joost schouppe (2017-01-02 21:32:13+00:00): Okay! Good luck with the Pokemon and happy mapping :)
mavl (2017-01-12 17:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
kartler175 (2017-05-20 13:04:34+00:00): Offensichttlich besteht hier keine bauliche Trennung der Fahrspuren, weshalb dann die Auftrehnnung in eigenständige highways?
Und wenn schon Auftrennung, dann bitte korrekt und vollständig mit Anpassung der lanes-Tags!
t2425b (2017-05-20 16:02:59+00:00): Die Aufspaltung stammt nicht von mir. Das ist offenbar schon seit fast zehn Jahren so.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:14:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:36:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:19:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-02 06:39:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the differenet highways together
grouper (2017-01-04 21:10:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I'm curious - why would hunting stands be located on road centerlines?
nammala (2017-01-31 06:24:18+00:00): Hi Steven Santiago,

Based on the above comment made by grouper, the hunting_stands doesn't seems appropriate in the centre of the road. I am going ahead and deleting all of these.

Regards,
nammala
mavl (2017-01-12 17:16:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Supaplex (2017-01-02 05:12:45+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-01-12 17:39:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Supaplex (2017-01-06 16:58:05+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:33:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
FTA (2017-01-06 04:37:03+00:00): Hi there,
In this changeset, I noticed you added a 'banner_url' tag to this object that seems to redirect to a travel agency. Did you add this intentionally? What does this tag represent?

Thanks!
Ethan aka FTA
mavl (2017-01-12 17:26:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:28:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:26:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:35:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:03:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:31:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:05:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:39:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:25:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-02 06:45:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/737476802 ? Are there two restaurants in the same building?
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Markus366 (2017-05-29 16:04:44+00:00): Hallo,
dieser und weitere Abschnitte einer geplanten/ im Bau befindlichen Straßen wurden zuletzt mehrfach von verschiedenen Nutzern unterschiedlich getaggt. Häufig wurden die Schlüssel highway:construction , trunk: und construction: hin und her geändert. Vielleicht können die betroffenen Mapper eine einheitliche Lösung finden, um unnötige Arbeit zu vermeiden.

Danke,
Markus
GerdP (2017-08-30 09:20:49+00:00): Vielleicht hilft ja https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
um seltsame tags wie highway=never_built 
zu vermeiden.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:14:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:05:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Hjart (2017-01-02 11:30:30+00:00): Landeveje som disse der er pænt over 5 m brede tagges efter min opfattelse bedst som tertiary: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtertiary. Vi har tidligere tagget næsten alt der ikke faldt ind under secondary og op som unclassified, men jeg er nu begyndt i større stil at rette dette. Unclassified betegner efter min nuværende opfattelse hovedsageligt landeveje med en bredde på under 4 m.
mikkolukas (2017-01-03 05:36:52+00:00): Søttrupvej er væsentligt mindre end Hobrovej/Vester hornumvej der ligger umiddelbart vest herfor.

Sidstnævnte er markeret som tertiary, men er en langt større vej end førstnævnte.
mikkolukas (2017-01-03 05:38:03+00:00): Søttrupvej er knapt 4 meter bred
mikkolukas (2017-01-03 05:40:51+00:00): Jeg opponerer ikke mod argumentet, men mangler en mere fast definition
Hjart (2017-01-03 08:43:15+00:00): Jeg måler (ved i JOSM at trække en linie på tværs af vejen og se længden på den nederst på vinduet) Søttrupvej til at være ca 5.5 m bred (det lange stykke syd for Gatten). Vester Hornumvej ser ud til at være ca 6.0 m bred (men med tydelig midterstribe)
Hjart (2017-01-03 11:12:28+00:00): Det er som med så meget andet i OSM svært at give en helt entydig definition og indtil https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29698979 (og tilhørende privat diskussion) taggede jeg selv stort set alle landeveje unclassified. Nu er min tommelfingerregel (for landeveje i Danmark) at de der er for smalle til at 2 modkørende biler kan passere hinanden uden begge at måtte trække ud i grøften er unclassified. Stort set alt derover (indtil vi kommer op i secondary etc) tertiary.
mikkolukas (2017-01-10 13:56:39+00:00): Mmh, den tommelfingerregel er enkel og til at forholde sig til. Lad os få Søttrupvej op på tertiary igen :)
Hjart (2017-01-10 16:14:59+00:00): :-D
mavl (2017-01-12 17:17:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:28:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:30:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:03:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:14:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-05 13:03:05+00:00): Hello, Abertrockon. Please, explain, what did you want to add? What objects?
mavl (2017-01-12 17:24:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:02:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:17:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:26:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:36:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].