piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fgouget (2022-07-07 21:37:42+00:00): Le dernier nœud, 315780108, est marqué shop=vacant. C'est peut-être de là que venait le problème de copier/coller. Du coup peut-être faudrait-il mettre disused:shop=yes sur ce nœud ?
Britzz (2022-07-08 14:13:25+00:00): je ne comprends pas, vous avez vous-même indiqué via une note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3215067) : Centre Medico-Dentair. Je fais une recherche sur le web et trouve https://nobelsanteplus.fr/nos-centres/centre-dentaire-paris-14-alesia/
Sur cette base j'ai modifié le POI de "magasin de chaussures" en "centre médical", suite à votre note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1579650020/history).
Pourquoi faudrait-il le passer en vacant ou disused ?
fgouget (2022-07-11 02:11:44+00:00): Ma dernière remarque ne concerne pas le centre dentaire mais le nœud 315780108.
Britzz (2022-07-11 12:37:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/315780108, ok, je comprends.
Pour ma part, ce sont des synonymes ; en lisant  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant je constate que, dans les deux cas, ils seront remontés dans la quête StreetComplete ad-hoc.
Vous pouvez tout à fait changer la clé/valeur si vous le souhaitez.
Enock4seth (2022-07-16 08:16:56+00:00): Thanks for mapping. It would be nice and useful to yourself and other mappers to use a good changeset comment rather than leaving it blank. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy Mapping!
ElliottPlack (2022-07-06 21:40:12+00:00): Hello again, just a friendly reminder to remove the "tiger:reviewed=no" tag when you've finished editing the roadway geometry. That lets other mappers know that this has been checked. You can remove all of the tiger: tags if you'd like. I'd also like to invite you to the OSM US slack #local-maryland channel where the Maryland community on OSM is centered. We'd love to have you as a participant on the eastern shore! Join here https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-17 00:08:31+00:00): repeated?
MikeN (2022-07-08 01:28:55+00:00): Thanks for the update - the lifecycle tag should include the former key also: abandoned:aeroway for this example.  I have updated the abandoned features here.
CAI Stabia (2022-07-07 13:31:49+00:00): Why do you deleted the stadium name "Romeo Menti"?
stadiaarcadia (2022-07-07 16:59:52+00:00): It’s not removed (?)
ivanbranco (2022-07-07 17:26:25+00:00): They meant here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/405361018

I guess that stadiaarcadia deleted the name from the pitch because it was a duplicate of the stadium as a whole: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150199670
stadiaarcadia (2022-07-08 14:35:15+00:00): Yes that's true. The stadium name is still there, at the stadium and not at the football pitch.
SekeRob (2022-09-05 17:07:17+00:00): Ciao

Perché mappare un percorso su strade esistenti? Il modo corretto per mappare i percorsi escursionistici/passeggiati è creare una relazione contrassegnando tutta la sezione di strada con la relazione che fa parte del percorso. È possibile aggiungere solo sezioni che non sono state mappate in precedenza.

In questo momento il tuo set di modifiche ha generato molte centinaia di avvisi di nodi non connessi, ne hai corretti circa 165 nella versione 2, ma ancora molte centinaia di aree rimanenti.

Comunque. Esiste un riferimento ufficiale per queste percorsi poiché il mappatore nella versione 3 ha modificato il numero della percorso da 1 a 11.

Se mi fornisci un link ai percorsi documentati (2 anelle) sarei felice di farlo come si deve.

Ciao dall'Abruzzo

(in inglese per gli stranieri)

Hello

Why map a route on existing roads? The correct way to map hiking / walking routes is to create a relationship then marking the entire stretch of road with the relationship that is part of the route. You can only add sections that have not been mapped previously.

Right now your change set has generated many hundreds of unconnected node warnings, you have corrected about 165 in version 2, but there are still many hundreds of unconnected nodes left.

Anyway. There is an official reference for these routes as the mapper in version 3 changed the route number from 1 to 11.

If you give me a link to the documented routes (2 rings) I would be happy to do it properly.

Hello from the Abruzzi
SekeRob (2022-09-05 17:10:36+00:00): Spiacenti, mappatore sbagliato, l'intenzione era di inviare questo alla persona della versione 1 e 2
SekeRob (2022-10-25 09:28:04+00:00): The 2 route with same name Anello delle Bregonze n.11 (1075675888, v3+V5 will soon be removed as having been mapped on top of other existing ways with hundreds of unconnected nodes overlying other ways. Need to have a walking/hiking route relation created.

Sorry

Il 2° percorso omonimo Anello delle Bregonze n.11 (1075675888, v3+V5 sarà presto rimosso in quanto mappato su altri percorsi esistenti con centinaia di nodi non collegati sovrapposti ad altri percorsi. Necessita di una relazione percorso pedonale/escursionistico creato.

Mi dispiace.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 11:29:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12141001662/history - is it some business POI? That deals with medicine?

Place where customers walk in?

Their internal office where no patients go in?

Something else?


https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9871232377 - is it a shop?
lololailo (2022-07-07 12:35:35+00:00): Hola, no entiendo lo que has hecho. ¿Porque cambias ese tag? Antes era correcto. Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123295264
VLD189 (2022-07-07 18:30:09+00:00): Hey, 
I have change the name tag back to english. Sorry for the inconvenience. 
Take care!
eggie (2022-07-07 07:01:27+00:00): 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
dmpcc (2022-07-07 07:27:12+00:00): Bedankt Eggie!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:22:20+00:00): Agrega un nombre a la ubicación.
Ygramul (2022-07-08 08:18:32+00:00): You've by now repeatedly added the tag "oeprator:type=public" (note the typo in "operator") to some objects, despite "operator:type=public" already being set. Perhaps you should check for typos before pasting the same tag again :-)
emersonveenstra (2022-07-07 09:55:58+00:00): Hi,

Was this done from an on-site survey? Last time I went through that stretch of road, the signs all said "M-40", not "Lincoln Road"
Falsernet (2022-07-07 14:26:19+00:00): Is this a specific type of road sign used to denote a road name? M-40 is a route number (described by the ref tag) and it's not accepted practice to duplicate it with the name tag
emersonveenstra (2022-07-07 15:11:24+00:00): It's standard road signs on stop signs and traffic signal poles (https://goo.gl/maps/doLJEYRXNknnRA4t6).
eggie (2022-07-07 07:06:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Wat is de bedoeling van deze bijdrage?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123295949

Waarom hier een berg plaatsen op de kaart van OSM met een hoogte van bijna 2000m?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-07 07:16:02+00:00): Wellicht kun je beter gebruiken.. amenity=community_centre 
of amenity=social_centre als het een club betreft.

Graag de berg en hoogte verwijderen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-07 08:01:37+00:00): Arie,
Oneigenlijke tagging heb ik aangepast naar club..
Begmassief verwijderd. 
Gr eggie
gscholz (2022-07-08 05:26:21+00:00): Hi  Nadia Moral,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.58158&lat=-25.35062&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123296007

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Cartographer10 (2022-10-23 08:29:04+00:00): Hey,

Volgens Osmose heb je in deze changset ( en enkele andere) tagloze wegen gemapt. Wat stellen die voor? als het goed is geeft JOSM een uploadwaarschuwing als er geen tag aan een weg zit.

Je hebt overigens ook veel wegen met overlappende dingen: https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/Teek?level=3
Lars_TheViking (2023-10-30 17:29:49+00:00): Hello JJIglesias,

I see that you have been active in adding many of the ref tags on highways in Bolivia. In most cases, it also appears that you have been changing the classification of these highways to trunk when a ref tag is applied to them. Would you mind sharing what prompted these classification changes, as well as what resources you are using when making the edits? And is an official OSM policy in Bolivia to classify roads based solely on the ref tag?

While roads do not need to be paved or in the best condition to be classified as a trunk, I do believe that solely basing the importance of a highway from its ref can lead to inconsistent classification.  For example, F37 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103104681 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310566588) is a narrow, unpaved road that leads through a few small villages and only serves as a connection to two other national refs on either side, which may not fit the definition of a trunk highway according to the Bolivia Road Classification wiki page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Bolivia/Clasificaci%C3%B3n_de_carreteras). This compares to F1 connecting El Alto/La Paz to Oruro (from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120511149 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380457971) and continuing on to many other large cities, which is a multi-lane, paved dual carriageway. These highways share the same classification despite having very different levels of importance within the greater Bolivia highway network. This difference necessitates different classifications even though they both carry a national highway ref.

I would be happy to hear your thoughts on this and how you feel about some of these highways with national refs but lesser importance being changed to a lower classification.  Happy mapping!
MxxCon (2022-07-07 02:15:13+00:00): Rather than deleting and re-drawing, it's generally best to modify/update existing feature. This way you are preserving history of that object if there's ever need to reference back to it. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123296644
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-17 14:39:42+00:00): Note, something went wrong with surface at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076460339/history
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-17 14:40:20+00:00): And https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902458006/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547707508/history
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-17 14:40:58+00:00): Seems like it should be surface=asphalt - I edited it this way
Ökkel (2022-09-17 21:46:38+00:00): Yes, AutoComplete fail
nevw (2022-07-07 08:48:22+00:00): Hi
roads and tracks on private property are able to be mapped. They should also have access tags added if known, such as access=private.
Please only delete roads on private property if the property is yours or the ways were mapped by you.
It is preferred not to delete other mappers work unless it no longer depicts what is on the ground.
PrivatePropertyOnly (2022-07-07 10:59:54+00:00): Hi, the tracks were deleted from the properties owned by us and our neighbours (following a neighbourhood discussion). There is no public access to these properties or this Section of National Park. They were deleted to deter trespassing which has and will continue to result in reports to law enforcement.  The Author who mapped these tracks was notified that they were deleted.
nevw (2022-07-07 11:23:47+00:00): Thanks for the reply and  your reasons seems fine.
MxxCon (2022-07-07 03:04:48+00:00): Hello.
Please note that OSM is a mapping service used by millions of people and it is not allowed to make fake or joke edits in it. As such this edit have been reverted.
However, you are more than welcome to make legitimate edits around your neighborhood.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123297937
Allison P (2022-08-31 22:44:22+00:00): The roads you added are residential, not service. Please fix them.
dtbhavan (2022-09-01 15:16:23+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset. Apologies for the incorrect road classification and tagging residential roads as service roads.

Going forward, I'll ensure to tag such roads as residential roads. We have made the necessary corrections in the changeset #125661014

Thanks once again for the feedback provided, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
dtbhavan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:12:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Carnildo (2022-07-07 20:33:51+00:00): This is the third copy of the Music Plus Learning Center you've added to the map.  Is there a reason for this redundancy?
dagwood70 (2022-07-07 20:45:38+00:00): My mistake. I made addition thru/on 2 different iPhone apps not realizing it. I must have mistakenly done it twice on 1 of them. Appologies.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:31:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:23:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:22:09+00:00): Por favor, no ponga nombres genéricos, ponga un nombre propio.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-10 10:03:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9871496198/history - what you meant by shop=13 here?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-10 10:03:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9871536930/history - what you meant by shop=24 here?
T－T (2023-04-10 10:14:28+00:00): that's a Traditional Chinese medicine Clinic
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-10 11:04:23+00:00): So shop=24 tag may be removed, right?

Are they also selling some Traditional Chinese products there?
T－T (2023-04-10 11:47:45+00:00): thats the shop number
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-17 09:26:37+00:00): Would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref fit fr that case?
kingkingHK (2026-06-10 13:18:56+00:00): @T－T May you provide more information about this POI? I cannot find anything about it on the internet; searching "為群跌打" only returns results about a clinic in Yat Tung with the same name.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:08:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:17:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Surveyor2503 (2022-07-10 04:31:39+00:00): Hi Angyork, fantastic work drawing these houses and addressing them!

I'd recommend tagging the areas as houses rather than just buildings
Angyork (2022-07-11 09:51:56+00:00): Thank you, it is part of my well being to mono task on something. I will change them over the houses gradually. Is there an easy way to look at a large amount of houses to see what tag they are without having to select them all?
Surveyor2503 (2022-07-13 11:25:59+00:00): I'm not sure sorry, but if you do select a bunch of the building polygons, then you can just change the tag for everything selected to building=house
nevw (2022-07-14 11:56:27+00:00): Hi, I have begun retagging these to building=house for those that seem suitable on satellite imagery.
https://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=14&lat=-38.02062&lon=145.3239&layers=BTT&user=nevw&age=1
nevw (2022-07-16 03:41:54+00:00): I have done a great many but this appears to be a failing of the processing of Microsoft building footprints and will need a tasking manger approach by others to resolve.
Angyork (2022-07-16 03:44:36+00:00): I have done all this by hand, it is not auto generated. I can and will convert to houses, please give me some time
Angyork (2022-07-16 03:47:02+00:00): Many thanks for those who have assisted on converting building to house. :)
nevw (2022-07-16 04:17:16+00:00): Sorry, I should have been more specific in my comment. 
I expect all of your edits are now fixed in Victoria as from a quick look I think the remainder are in industrial, commercial and things like schools and businesses. So I would just continue from where you left off.
But the problem is still prevalent wherever others have mapped.
Angyork (2022-07-16 04:22:14+00:00): Ok, thanks for the clarification. I thought is was just for the changesets for this particular location. I will keep an eye out for other changes others have made as I go through. Many thanks for the clarification again.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Warin61 (2022-07-07 23:51:58+00:00): Hi,


Your leaving a few errors behind ... 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.21312&lat=-32.66997&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Would you mind fixing these? And do look at the warning messages you get before uploading.
AndrewS (2022-07-08 02:53:22+00:00): Fixed. Thanks.

iD reported these as 'nodes close to each other. do you want to merge' when I went to upload and I assumed no because they were different ways. I will look deeper in future.
Supaplex (2022-07-07 12:30:46+00:00): 應該舊隧道內要 bicycle=dismount 吧
4145838336
台灣紫斑蝶 (2022-07-08 11:57:55+00:00): 2022/7/16改騎乘
台灣紫斑蝶 (2022-07-08 12:06:51+00:00): 因雙北單車道行人與單車共行，且這條單車道用鐵支拼湊路棧而成，且隧道內有蝙蝠生態保護採最低照明，路面漆黑，改以[步道]標示可通行[行人]與[單車]
Beau Jonckers (2025-10-06 21:43:30+00:00): Hallo Wikilux, kann ich das Gebiet area=residential von St. Niklausen komplett neu zeichnen ?
Wikilux (2025-10-07 04:46:38+00:00): Hier scheint alles nachgeführt zu sein, ausgenommen die Neubauten im Bereich Schildstrasse 3
Beau Jonckers (2025-10-07 07:40:42+00:00): Ich meine das Gebiet von area=residential. Dieses verläuft im Moment über Wiesen, Bauernhöfe, Strassen und verschiedene andere Flächen. An den Gebäuden möchte ich nichts ändern.
rjgambrel (2022-07-26 16:34:06+00:00): Please refer to note by SpeedMcCool at NW end of your changeset. Please do not revert Missie's reclassification to trunk w/o dialoging with SpeedMcCool or me in Slack #local-minnesota channel. This is part of the minn highway classification project which I know you are aware of. Thanks!
Joseph R P (2022-07-31 00:38:11+00:00): Hello, I had not realized that there was a note and that this section of road is now at motorway-grade. I just updated this section by dividing the carriageways to prevent others from making my mistake.
Filip009 (2022-09-12 07:56:30+00:00): Chcelo by to nejakú poznámku, že prečo je tá cesta tak odveci https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076488771
synalik (2022-09-12 08:56:20+00:00): stalo sa :)
Filip009 (2022-09-12 09:45:21+00:00): Čiže chápem správne, že to nie je kvôli nejakej rekonštrukcii?
Filip009 (2022-09-12 09:47:34+00:00): Okej, už vidím :)
SeverinGeo (2022-07-27 20:43:58+00:00): Hello,
landuse=residential areas do not fit for admin boundaries
LuxuryCoop (2022-07-07 11:00:19+00:00): 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사합니다!
현재 합의된 대로라면 자연마을에는 place=hamlet, 법정리에는 place=village를 쓰게 되어 있습니다.
기여해 주신 '항리'와 '대풍리'는 법정리가 아닌 하나의 자연부락을 나타내는 지명이기 때문에 place=hamlet 태그를 쓰는 것이 맞습니다.

앞으로도 많은 기여 부탁드립니다!
Patchanka (2022-07-07 14:42:54+00:00): bonjour
pourquoi avoir supprimé le name:fr ? Il reste correct malgré le fait qu'il soit aussi présent dans le name. 
Par ailleurs, vous avez mis name:eus à la place du name:eu pour le nom en basque.
bonne journée
nevw (2022-07-07 08:18:14+00:00): I added office=company to this edit, assuming your business is located here.