piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
HolgerJeromin (2016-08-04 12:12:03+00:00): Der deutsche Name ist meiner Recherche nach Mansergh-Kaserne. Siehe http://www.bundeswehr-journal.de/2013/farewell-britische-streitkrafte-ziehen-frueher-ab/ http://carl.media/termine/td/britische-streitkraefte-laden-zum-englischsprachigen-theater-in-guetersloh-ein/

Der englische Name und real genutzte Name ist Barracks. Also ist das nach meinem Empfinden so genau richtig getaggt.
Dass die real genutzte Sprache des Namens nicht der Umgebung entspricht liegt nun mal daran, dass hier Ausländer am Werk waren.
flohoff (2016-08-04 12:34:10+00:00): Diese Namensgebung halte ich aber für die Erfindung eines übereifrigen Redakteurs der Bundeswehrwebseiten. Ich habe den vor deinem umtagging noch nie gehört. Das Bundesamt für Liegenschaftsangelegenheiten spricht auch von Masergh Barracks - Nach dem Abzug sind die ja dann Eigentümer.

https://britenabzug.bundesimmobilien.de/301553/gutersloh

Deine Nutzung des name:* tags ist halt gerade sehr unüblich und wird deshalb von Osmose auch angewarnt. In "name" kommt immer der lokale name in der Landessprache. In den entsprechenden name:<isokürzel> kommen dann übersetzungen in andere als die lokale Sprache. So steht da jetzt der Englische Name in name - name:de dürfte es in Deutschland gar nicht geben.

Flo
Supaplex (2016-05-27 16:04:24+00:00): 您好

可以在左側搜尋欄位輸入「停車場」，就可以找到對應的項目。

我已經修改了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39607613
eastender (2016-05-28 18:24:14+00:00): I think that the road added by this changeset is wrong. There used to be a road for traffic here, but it was removed several months ago. The satellite imagery hasn't caught up with this development yet. Currently there is a pedestrian square being constructed in the area between Aldgate High Street and Duke's Place. I suggest that the road added by this changeset is deleted.
samely (2016-05-30 15:31:35+00:00): Hey! there,
I traced this road because there was a feedback saying that this road was missing, and based on satellite imagery I decided to trace it. Now that your feedback is kind contradictory to the other one, I decided to delete it and leave a note instead (openstreetmap.org/note/577832). Thanks for your feedback.
Supaplex (2016-05-27 16:03:13+00:00): 增加沖之鳥島中文名稱，name:zh=沖之鳥島
Add Chinese name of Okinotorishima: 沖之鳥島, name:zh=沖之鳥島
Supaplex (2016-05-27 16:39:08+00:00): 已經有火車站的節點噢
然後同名的公車站怎麼被刪了？
mivxxx (2016-05-27 19:00:00+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо за Ваш вклад в OpenStreetMap. При обрисовке объектов по спутниковым снимкам следует учитывать смещение картинки (см. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2). Данный пруд был нарисован с учетом смещения, а новая его позция (которая видимо в Вашем редакторе полностью совпадает с контурами на снимке) сместилась относительно фактического расположения.
user_5359 (2016-05-28 09:51:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from the owner or the residential to a residential building, please!
user_5359 (2016-05-28 10:22:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you forgot to add amenity=restaurant (see changeset comment)?
user_5359 (2016-05-28 10:22:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please double check your information on the node. You add the address and a name in one tag.
user_5359 (2016-05-28 10:26:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!

And any an address is only notice on the main building.
user_5359 (2016-05-28 10:20:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If This is a restaurant (see changeset comment) please add amenity=restaurant.  if this a private house please delete the name (no information about residential or owner of a residential building)
user_5359 (2016-05-28 10:31:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
user_5359 (2016-05-28 07:46:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from the owner or the residential to a residential building, please!
user_5359 (2016-05-28 06:18:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from the owner or the residential to a residential building, please!
user_5359 (2016-05-28 07:48:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the value of opening_hours.
user_5359 (2016-05-28 06:12:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from the owner or the residential to a residential building, please!
malenki (2016-05-28 11:09:27+00:00): Hi alo8,
are you sure that this and the other ways in its neighbourhood are motorways?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143017648
In case they aren't it would be nice if you fixed them.
Best Regards
malenki
alo8 (2016-05-28 20:03:52+00:00): @malenki: Thanks for pointing out that mistake of mine. It is fixed now. No new strange "motorways" in that area any more. (Even that close to AMG not...)  
Regards, alo8
Jacob's-Staff (2016-07-08 21:27:48+00:00): Hej alo8, was ist den mit der Relation#2129654 gemeint, hier ist nur die Abkürzung "JKT 05" bzw. das Netzwerk "JKT" angeben. Kannst du kurz eine Beschreibung geben, da nichts dazu im OSM-Wiki zu finden war. Auch wer ist denn der Betreiber? Vor Ort finde ich nur welche vom Alpverein, der Naturschutzverwaltung-BW oder Aktive 55plus Remseck. ### If preferred - we could also discuss in English.
alo8 (2016-07-09 14:17:51+00:00): Hi Jacob's-Staff, das würde mich auch interessieren. Die Erstellung und letzte Streckenänderung ist von 2012 (icebird333). Sie hat auch kein osmc:symbol tag. Deshalb meiner Meinung nach fraglich ob dies überhaupt eine sinnvolle (=markierte) Route ist.
Es gibt insgesamt 35 Relationen namens "JKT ..." in dieser Gegend. Manche davon haben operator=kai (was auch immer das bedeutet).
Jacob's-Staff (2016-07-25 00:04:46+00:00): Okay, ich habe dich zuerst einmal angeschrieben, da du dich viel mit Routen beschäftigst. Was sagt denn icebird333 dazu? Wenn mehrere dieser JKT-Routen auch an dir bekannten Stellen nicht existieren, kann man ja eine Löschung erwägen, da diese auch keine online oder sonstig aufzufindenden Beschreibungen/Nachweise haben.
Field Enterprise (2016-05-27 21:23:51+00:00): Actually, this was an edit to the Pelandale/99 interchange, Modesto, CA
user_5359 (2016-05-28 06:17:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please double check the opening hours (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours). Currently this shop is closed(!) every day from 08am-11am, all other hours are opened.
user_5359 (2016-05-28 06:04:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add private information tt a building. And your changeset comment describes a total other work.
user_5359 (2016-05-28 06:09:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from the owner or the residential to a residential building, please!
Владимир К (2016-05-29 12:51:53+00:00): отсоедините детскую площадку полянка от промышленной улицы
Владимир К (2016-05-29 12:55:58+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421322044 вот это отсоедините от дороги. И парковку. и почему детская площадка через здание проходит? Будьте аккуратнее.
Владимир К (2016-05-29 12:50:44+00:00): отсоедините школу от народной улицы.
Tubes (2018-11-27 03:23:26+00:00): Is this a substation?
mueschel (2016-05-28 13:36:19+00:00): Hi aruell,
there are buildings with a lot of tags that do not belong to the OSM database, e.g. http://osm.org/way/421336335
Could you please check that? 
Btw, please add comments to your changeset and indicate the source of your edits, especially for large changes like this one.

Jan
keithonearth (2016-05-27 18:41:28+00:00): Porpoise Bay Park was divided up into 4 blocks, with the road dividing it east/west, and an additional north south divide that did not seem to be for any reason, or correspond with any physical feature. Nor is it shown on other maps. As such I have joined the north sections with the south sections. Now the road divides the park into two sections, as with many other parks with a road through them.

As some of the same lines were used for park boundary and Sechelt City boundary this edit effected that as well, but no changes were made to the boundary demarcation.
TZorn (2016-06-02 13:00:23+00:00): Siehe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop=pet?uselang=de
So kann man die Läden noch genauer beschreiben.
Nakaner (2016-05-29 18:01:26+00:00): Hallo korpi,

bitte bei künftigen Änderungen einen Punkt als Dezimaltrenner statt dem Komma verwenden. Das gilt nicht nur für railway:position=*, sondern auch für alle anderen Längen-/Gewichts-/…-Angaben in OSM.

Kannst du das selbst mit geringem Aufwand korrigieren, oder soll ich es mit Overpass+Level0 tun?

Viele Grüße

Michael
BCNorwich (2016-05-28 06:01:20+00:00): Hi, I've added the POI to the building to avoid duplication of info. Plus added a few details and corrected the building shape.
kuhni74 (2024-01-13 17:59:40+00:00): Ist das Kloster St. Josef (way 190053066) wirklich "ehem."? http://kloster-breitenfurt.at/
emergency99 (2024-01-13 19:04:04+00:00): Bilde mir ein diese Note damals aus einer Node am Gebäude übernommen zu haben, da aber das Kloster offenbar eben nicht ehem. ist, hab ich diese Note nun entfernt.
kuhni74 (2024-01-14 21:52:47+00:00): danke!
GinaroZ (2016-05-27 23:59:55+00:00): I doubt this garden is actually named "Accommodations edinburgh" in Polish...
BCNorwich (2016-05-28 06:22:33+00:00): Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It looks like you inadvertently made addition to the live OSM map/database. This added nothing but unfortunately did dragged two other highways out of alignment. I have reverted these changes so the map/database is now back as it was.
May I remind that the map is live and open to everyone to make additions. But one has to be very careful not to make mistakes. If I can help in any way please ask. Regards
RicoElectrico (2016-07-06 21:50:45+00:00): Jest pytanie o fragment przed rondem:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/618542
JaMar (2016-07-07 17:58:05+00:00): Droga jest jeszcze nieprzejezdna, trwa ustawianie oznakowania. W ciągu kilku dni powinna zostać otwarta.
cronoser (2016-05-30 21:54:09+00:00): Hola, 
Veo que has editado por Burgos. Si cuando subes un cambio a OSM indicas alguna descripción sobre los cambios ayudas al resto de la comunidad a saber que hemos tocado cada cual.
Un saludo
Patr1k_P (2020-10-01 15:39:02+00:00): ahoj, v tejto sade sa nemoze doplnit "name obradna sien"...? bo hentak to mapa nevykresli ten nazov,je to ako keby tam nic nebolo...aj tam vznikla poznamka,lebo uzivatel nevie ze to tam vlastne je:)
Patr1k_P (2020-10-01 15:39:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302711442
aceman444 (2020-10-08 18:36:32+00:00): Ak je to na budove napisane, tak mozno aj. Ale len preto, ze neviem aka je na to spravna znacka. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:government%3Dregister_office to nebude, to je skor matrika. Nebude to nieco z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre +amenity=community_centre ?
Patr1k_P (2020-10-10 16:59:14+00:00): ano community_centre by mi tam pasovalo,lenze co dat do community_centre=*

...z uvedenych moznosti mi tam nic nepasuje....alebo staci len jeden tag?
aceman444 (2020-10-16 13:21:57+00:00): Ano staci amenity=community_centre, tie community_centre=* su nepovinne upresnujuce hodnoty. Tiez by som taku obradnu sien poznal aj v inej obci, dalo by sa dohodnut na fore ako to znacit.
freebeer (2018-12-05 14:03:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65205445 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me castle
smaprs (2016-05-28 00:20:51+00:00): Sorry, it was meant to be uploaded by the dedicated account, but it's JOSM's fault, it didn't asked for username in the open session.
user_5359 (2016-05-28 05:31:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your entry because a single apartment isn't a attraction.
BCNorwich (2016-05-28 05:49:04+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
It looks like you've placed Domino's on a car park. Features on OSM must be verifiable on the ground. Could you be more precise in positioning this POI, you could also include other details like address, website and phone. Regards
j-wills (2016-05-29 08:43:02+00:00): community_centre не подходит к сцене.
к тому же в name надо писать имена собственные
lromanov (2016-05-30 16:25:34+00:00): Я счёл этот тег самым близким по смыслу. Какой в таком случае тег нужно использовать?
j-wills (2016-06-02 04:26:29+00:00): leisure=bandstand ???
j-wills (2016-06-02 04:28:57+00:00): p.s. и уберите "сцена", если это не имя собственное
Carnildo (2016-05-28 01:53:16+00:00): I'm not sure what you were trying to do, but I seriously doubt that the city limits of Speed, KS are a pipeline.  I've reverted the change.
Commodoortje (2016-05-28 06:32:56+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik de poi samengevoegd met de adresnode, tevens heb ik de facebookpagina toegevoegd.
mweper (2016-05-28 13:22:00+00:00): Hola monivivi. Gracias por colaborar en el mapa.
--
Por favor, utiliza las etiquetas de categoría para identificar cada PDI y que se puedan visualizar correctamente en el mapa.
Recuerda no añadir el nombre de la categoría en la etiqueta name, la misma sirve para agregar el nombre del PDI y no la categoría.
--
En este caso sería: shop=kiosk
mweper (2016-05-28 13:23:20+00:00): Hola monivivi. Gracias por colaborar en el mapa.
--
Por favor, utiliza las etiquetas de categoría para identificar cada PDI y que se puedan visualizar correctamente en el mapa.
Recuerda no añadir el nombre de la categoría en la etiqueta name, la misma sirve para agregar el nombre del PDI y no la categoría.
--
En este caso sería: 
* amenity=school
* name=Familia de Dios
user_5359 (2016-05-28 06:01:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the name of the fast food. Can it be Burger King ?

Please don't use abbreviations.
Carnildo (2016-05-28 18:05:02+00:00): Unfortunately, Maps.Me is out of date.  I did some basic mapping of the shopping mall there two months ago, including that Burger King; Maps.Me hasn't picked up the changes yet.

If you've got an address, opening hours, or similar information, feel free to add them and I'll integrate it with the existing data.
literan (2016-05-30 12:13:10+00:00): Прошу вас не писать в поле "Название" слова "Автозапчасти", "Автомагазин" и т.п. - только само НАЗВАНИЕ, имя собственное (Exist, АГА)
Erelen (2016-06-10 23:50:27+00:00): Да и заведомо некорректных "website=велик.ру" лучше избегать.
nyampire (2016-05-28 21:18:05+00:00): こんにちは。
再度の通達です。
OpenStreetMapは事実情報を記載する場所です。
編集されたデータは、世界中の人々によって利用されています。
あなたが編集された情報は、事実として存在しない地物です。
誤ったデータを投入することは避けてください。
freebeer (2018-10-11 21:00:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63434212 where the changeset comment is: two implausibly-sited businesses giving 24/7 opening hours that do not correspond to physical buildings
wormitok (2016-06-04 12:39:35+00:00): Hallo,
wieso hast du die Hausnummer von dem Gebäude gelöscht und als Punkt erfasst?
Das ist vollkommen unnötig und die verbleibenden Adressdaten auf dem Gebäude sind ohne die Hausnummer fehlerhaft.
Die Hausnummer dient nicht dazu um den Eingang zu erfassen!
lg
geoaria (2019-04-28 14:35:18+00:00): سلام جناب کسلر
متوجه چرایی ترسیم برخی کوچه ها به صورت تونل توسط شما نشدم. با توجه به نبود هر گونه سقف یا تونل در این محل آنها را تصحیح کردم.
kesler (2019-04-28 14:52:45+00:00): سلام

ممنون از کامنت شما، این بسته تغییر مال سه سال قبل بوده و الان چیزی یادم نیست اما احتمالی که میدم اینه که چون موارد تکراری پشت سر هم که تگهای یکسان دارند رو کلید Shift+R میزنم، تگ یکی از اونها به بقیه هم ورده. کاشکی یکی از اونها رو قبل از تصحیح بهم نشون میدادین.
درهر صورت ممنون که اونها رو تصحیح کردین و شما و هرکس دیگه در ویرایش کارهای من اگه اشکال داشته آزاده

با تشکر
geoaria (2019-04-28 15:02:44+00:00): درود بر شما 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/export#map=19/32.58669/51.57625

اگر نیاز به هرگونه بازگشت به حالت قبل بود عنوان کنید تا برگردانم
kesler (2019-04-28 16:10:45+00:00): سلامی دوباره

اوکی متوجه شدم. دقیقا همون مورد بود که گفتم چون همگی کنار هم بودن. اشتباه فاحشی بود. با عرض معذرت.

متشکرم
yurasi (2016-11-15 16:08:01+00:00): Hi gerkeng.
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you deleted some roads and I was wondering why do you deleted them since based on  Bing imagery those ones exist.
gerkeng (2016-11-15 23:50:40+00:00): yes,this area redevelopment,pls refer google satellite for updated information
yurasi (2016-11-17 14:30:57+00:00): Thanks for your answer, but for your information it is not allowed to use proprietary imagery sources in OpenStreetMap.
emergency99 (2016-05-28 17:35:16+00:00): Ich denke nicht, dass der Fotoautomat so heißt. Bitte den name Tag nur verwenden, wenn es echt einen Namen hat. Hier bitte keinen Name Tag!
sbiribizio (2016-05-30 06:23:55+00:00): Per cortesia correggi il tuo changeset:
il landuse=residential si usa solo per le zone coperte da case, non per tutto il comune.
Alcune informazioni (link wikipedia e website) possono essere messe sul nodo del comune, altre (ele e description) possono essere omesse
Supaplex (2016-05-28 11:12:30+00:00): 您好：

由於Google Earth和百度地圖皆受版權保護，直接描繪恐違反他們的使用者條款。OpenStreetMap靠wikipedia方式群眾繪製共編的線上地圖，因用版權允許的地圖來描，像是Bing或是MapBox。你這樣用版權不允許的地圖描繪會危害到OpenStreetMap。
請好好考慮清楚
Commodoortje (2016-05-28 10:03:20+00:00): Michelle, goed van je dat je gepoogd hebt om met Maps.me een school op OSM te zetten.
Deze heb ik inmiddels verwijdert, omdat de school al aanwezig was. En dubbel op de kaart is niet de bedoeling.
one feature one element.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334724601
highflyer74 (2016-05-30 10:47:03+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

For example Orkney Lodge=Parking is not a valid OSM tag.

If you need some help, don't hesitate to let me know :-)

All the best,

highflyer74
MLF22 (2016-06-08 20:37:09+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai créé le rond-point qui se trouve à l'intersection de la D6 et de la D79 mais le serveur m'indique un conflit avec votre groupe de modifications. N'étant pas très au point avec JOSM, pouvez-vous m'aider?
Merci d'avance
Pays de Guingamp (2016-06-09 13:55:38+00:00): Avez vous plus d'informations sur l'erreur?
MLF22 (2016-06-09 16:23:27+00:00): Voici le message qui s'affiche lorsque je veux envoyer mon fichier :
"L'envoi a échoué car le serveur possède une version plus récente. Le conflit a pour origine le chemin avec l'identifiant 25394313. Le serveur possède la version 13, votre version est 12."
J'ai tenté vainement une résolution du conflit mais dans ce cas la partie de la D6 avant le rond-point que je veux créer est supprimée. Cette nouvelle portion de D6 est différente de l'ancienne avant travaux.
Merci d'avance pour votre aide.
highflyer74 (2016-05-30 10:34:27+00:00): Hello!

Can you please check the keys inn=*, kpp=* and ogrn=*? Are these necessary? If they are some kind of internal reference of the shop? If yes, please consider using ref=*.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to write!
Assargadon (2016-06-11 04:47:30+00:00): Hi!

Inn, ogrn and kpp is codes, given to any firm when registering it within government register of firms.

Due to historic and buerocratical reasons there are combination of three codes, not single one, as you may expect. Specifically, OGRN is the code in unite governmental register, as stated above, and INN is tax registration. KPP is tax registration, also - usable if firm have several branches in different districts.

Those codes may be quite useful sometimes. They actually was useful for me personally several times (though I never get them from the map), that's why I'm trying to put them for places like shops. And, by law, they are presented on shop's signs, so I beleive there is something rational in putting them to map.
highflyer74 (2016-06-11 08:30:37+00:00): Hello and thank you for the feedback! That's interesting to know, as I did not see these keys before. Have a nice day!
chihchun (2016-05-28 16:46:53+00:00): 請問這條道路的用途是什麼？空照圖看不道路線，而且此道路沒有連結到其他建築或其他道路
tayalmalai (2016-05-29 14:25:54+00:00): 這條路用途是用在行走或是開車騎車到墳墓
chihchun (2016-05-29 14:45:30+00:00): 謝謝，如果附近有大片的公墓或墓區也可以標注上去。
Commodoortje (2016-05-28 10:08:07+00:00): test     
[one feature one element](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:One_feature,_one_OSM_element)
Commodoortje (2016-05-28 10:08:55+00:00): [url=http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:One_feature,_one_OSM_element]test[/url]
hauke-stieler (2019-08-12 19:07:12+00:00): Hi, where does the data exactly come from? At least the Valafell near the Hekla looks strange. I find a different elevation (764m) and location (64.11527N 19.5026W) on the internet.
synidd (2019-08-13 17:38:54+00:00): It came from here: https://en.ja.is/kort/?type=map&x=475065&y=399618&z=7
mikkolukas (2019-05-11 21:11:16+00:00): Ifølge det danske communitys retningslinjer, er det kun primærruter der bør være highway=primary ... og at så længe Adgangsvejen/H.E. Bluhmesvej ikke er gjort til en primærrute (altså et vejnummerskilt med gul baggrund), så bør den forblive tertiary.
mikkolukas (2019-05-11 21:11:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Map_Features#Veje_.28Roads.29
Jørn-osm (2019-05-12 11:40:35+00:00): Se også

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70129917

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70125680
Владимир К (2017-01-19 13:38:32+00:00): что такое А?
Supaplex (2016-05-28 14:34:15+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
joost schouppe (2016-07-17 19:17:33+00:00): Is weg 146222642 werkelijk een tol-weg?
Supaplex (2016-05-28 14:34:25+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
R0bst3r (2016-05-31 13:49:21+00:00): Hat hier jmd ne Waffe versteckt? riffle=yes, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4087752200
Schusch (2016-06-04 11:26:09+00:00): hm, da wirfst du einfach mal ein Wörterbuch deiner Wahl (z.B.  leo.org oder linguee.de) oder schaust tatsächlich in einem dieser alten Verzeichnisse names Wörterbuch nach - die Waffe hat tatsächlich ein f weniger. Und zur Lösung des Missverständnisses schaust du dann hier nach:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Riffle
Und weil ich das einfach mal so gemacht habe, habe ich es unter anderem auch hier verkündet:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:waterway
Gruß, Schusch
Schusch (2016-06-04 11:26:34+00:00): (interessant, diese Kommentarfunktion kannte ich noch gar nicht)
R0bst3r (2016-06-04 11:49:03+00:00): Interessant, das Wort kannte ich noch nicht. Häm wir beide was gelernt.
Bin übrigens über osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm darauf gestoßen. Da findet man jeden erdenklichen Tippfehler. Gruß
Peilscheibe (2016-11-04 13:50:22+00:00): Hallo forfex,
in diesem Changeset hast Du alle bisher erfassten Radroutenwegweiser aus der Relation "Mettertal-Tour" entfernt, warum?
forfex (2016-11-05 10:59:17+00:00): Da muss was schief gelaufen sein, habe es hoffentlich richtig wieder hergestellt.
davidearl (2016-07-06 15:39:48+00:00): These are part of the University of Cambridge, not the hospital. By removing these tags, you wreck the University of Cambridge's online map, so we propose to put them back in. If you don't like this, perhaps we can have a discussion about it, but in the meantime, we need our map back!
trigpoint (2016-07-06 16:53:19+00:00): That sounds like you are tagging for the renderer.