piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:03:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93029623
Frans S (2020-10-26 12:32:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93029663
NKA (2020-10-25 21:52:52+00:00): Slike relasjoner brukes vel bare for svingerestriksjoner med tre medlemmer. Bedre å slette relasjonen og bare tagge veien med motor_vehicle=no + bus=yes.

Jeg ville ha tagget veien unclassified fordi den er offentlig.

bus:lanes er overflødig fordi veien bare har ett kjørefelt.
NKA (2020-10-25 22:05:30+00:00): Og motor_vehicle:conditional	= designated @ (bus) er feil syntaks.
Frans S (2020-10-26 12:32:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93029902
TomPar (2020-10-28 05:55:17+00:00): I wonder why OSM is still showing some of these segments in blue that don't allow bicycles.
JeffMaps (2020-10-28 12:10:21+00:00): My openstreemap.org version shows an orange (red?) dashed line. Are you looking at RWGPS or some other site?
TomPar (2020-10-28 15:57:32+00:00): (Newbie here..)

Hello.  On OSM but with the Cycle Map layer turned on.  I dug a little and saw that updates to that view are not instantaneous but can take a couple/few weeks to make their way over.  It looks as you described for me too on the "Standard" layer.  Thanks.
Carnildo (2020-10-27 04:47:09+00:00): Is there a reason you deleted a bunch of sidewalks and the Kalispell Police Department?
Carnildo (2020-11-15 18:10:21+00:00): I've reverted the deletion.
DeBigC (2022-05-29 17:41:34+00:00): Maybe you know what does this, "the way contains a segment twice"
VictorIE (2022-05-29 17:50:26+00:00): Node 1531246495 seems to be used twice in the church.

Node 2394165098 seems to be used twice in the pedestrian area.
eggie (2020-10-26 08:19:49+00:00): Dag Dth,
Geen regel leisure=playground erbij?.. Dat is de hoofdtag .
De rest zijn specificaties. 
mvg,
eggie
Владимир К (2024-05-26 09:36:13+00:00): Добрый день. А в каком рендере ве это правильно показывается? вот тут например никаких окон нет https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=57.7500399&lon=40.8738305&zoom=21&camera.theta=65.34&camera.phi=-0.573

а тег building=window по идее означает здание в форме окна
BCNorwich (2020-11-03 09:11:25+00:00): Hi, your steps and paths at Waitrose don't seem to make logical sense, there are differing levels tagged and I presume differing layers but their all joined together.

Regards Bernard
VinasCZ (2020-11-15 23:28:50+00:00): Hi Bernard, thanks for taking the time to look at the paths :) The paths are connected together using the stairways on the two sides of the complex (next to no. 1 and no. 11, for example). There are 4 levels in total, and paths/entrances on each level are at the same positions. The paths/levels are ultimately joined up to the entrance to 365 Byres Road. To be honest I wasn't fully sure how to map this complex arrangment, so if you'd happen to know of a better/easier way to capture this building layout I'd be more than happy for corrections and changes :) FYI JOSM editor might be the best to look at the structure/leveling of the building, as it allows you to nicely filter out the different levels of the building.
Ossian Lore (2021-01-20 04:52:18+00:00): Hi, your mapping is really beautifully drawn but can you please not add pavements as separate paths to the road unless they are physically separated by grade. Pavement/sidewalk details should be added to the corresponding road using the appropriate tags
VinasCZ (2021-01-20 22:35:50+00:00): Heya Ossian, I can see that the conversation of separate vs. tagged ways has heated up a bit on the wiki too, with the two ways of mapping having their pros/cons shown (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Sidewalks). Anyways, the reason for why I have mapped the sidewalks is to avoid cluttering the main roads with connections to the townhouses that are quite numerous in West End (for example see Athole Gardens). A lot of these entrances have staircases leading up to them, which is a detail that is not well capturable without a separate way and connecting them straight to the road misrepresents the position of these staircases - and I think it's fairly important to capture these from accessibility point of view. Another reason is to capture the interesting crossing situations around busier Glaswegian roads, e.g. Byres/GWR. There are a few button-operated crossings with other streets not really lending themselves to be good points to cross. As an interesting example see the junction between GWR and Belmont Street and GWR leading up to the Kelvin Bridge. Crossing from Otago Street to north is virtually impossible due to how the traffic looks like - and there is an explicitly marked button-operated crossing next to Kelvin Bridge aside from the junction crossing between Bank Street and GWR. All in all I just could not find a better way to capture these, particularly when thinking about accessibility - how would a sight-impaired person navigate around the aforementioned GWR area if the sidewalks/crossings were not marked in this detail? Obviously it would be completely redundant for blocks of buildings with no distinct entrance paths and non-complex junctions, but I think in these cases the "separate sidewalks" mapping has a slight edge, although I recognise it does have its drawbacks in terms of potential clutter. I'd be happy to chat about this in more detail (even better, with more Glasgow mappers that you might know of) ... it would be nice to figure out local mapping guidelines, since every city and country has a slightly different style to its maps and Glasgow does not seem to have detailed guidances in this regard :)
VinasCZ (2021-01-20 22:41:06+00:00): Also, an interesting case to consider: junction of Queen Margaret's drive, Kelbourne Street, and Oban Drive. You can see I have mapped the railings placed alongside the western sides of the junction which were, quite certainly, placed there to prevent people from crossing Queen Margaret Drive. Not sure this situation can be represented without aid of separate sidewalks.
VinasCZ (2021-01-20 22:44:30+00:00): Another thing that I personally really like is the ability of the separate ways to better capture the geometry of sidewalks both within ond outwith junctions. Quite nice examples are the Kelvin Drive / Botanic Crescent section and the Kelvinside Avenue block.
VinasCZ (2021-02-20 16:37:04+00:00): Thanks for the detailed response and suggested approaches, I appreciate that introducing another mapping style into a city that does not use separate mapping of sidewalks is a bit more confusing than perhaps desirable - and particularly when UK does not really have a concept of jaywalking. As for the geometries of junctions, I have found out about the ability to specify crossing using the tag alone (i.e. crossing=no and separate nodes for where the crossing should instead take place), and the way you have suggested - i.e. piece of path between crossing points where needed - is a very good way to map the geometry; I have actualy recently used this approach when mapping a roundabout in another city. 

A small note, with the railing at the junction with QM drive and Kelvinside Av, that was supposed to be a kerb :) I have managed to mis-tag the barrier (I map kerbs to help with aerial/historical map alignment), so good spot there!
eggie (2020-10-28 13:04:39+00:00): 
Dag duimdog,,
Je vraagt om een review. 
Lijkt me allemaal oke zo
MVG
eggie
maraf24 (2021-02-26 11:50:57+00:00): Dlaczego "Wielkanocna"?
Snort (2021-03-01 15:52:43+00:00): Taka jest nazwa tej chatki. Polecam wpisać ją w google, informacje o niej są powszechne.
maraf24 (2021-03-01 17:31:14+00:00): Tak, już to wiem:) Podobnie jak nazwy innych chatek.
Przy okazji - byłeś tam? Na forum jest wątek tych chatek i KPNu.
Snort (2021-03-01 18:06:28+00:00): Tak, wszystkie miejsca, jakie zmapowałem, były przeze mnie odwiedzone osobiście. Widziałem też wątek na forum. Powiem tak - odkąd znam te miejsca to zawsze chciałem, żeby ktoś zwrócił uwagę na ich zaniedbanie i żeby ewentualnie znalazły się one pod opieką ludzi odpowiedzialnych i z pasją i przykro mi, że dochodzi do jakiś wandalizmów. Nie miałem złych intencji, po prostu zaznaczyłem na mapie to, co istnieje w rzeczywistości.
maraf24 (2021-03-01 18:28:47+00:00): Tak naprawdę to nie wiadomo, czy ich zmapowanie w OSM miało na wandalizmy jakiś wpływ. Trzeba by się wandali spytać, skąd wiedzieli o chatkach.
Frans S (2020-10-26 12:32:15+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93032158
Lokai (2020-10-26 05:04:24+00:00): Hallo Max,

willkommen bei OSM.

Bitte benutze die Funktion Gebäude rechtwinklig machen. Ebenso building=construction wenns passt.
Die Luftbilder von bing besser meiden, weil diese oft Lageungenau sind.

vG
mariotomo (2022-06-28 14:56:30+00:00): I've seen other mappers hint at **not** editing (complex) relations with iD, but reserve JOSM for that.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122938923
Trevor_1 (2022-06-29 01:24:49+00:00): Ok, sorry for the mistakes. I do now use JOSM for complex relations.
mariotomo (2021-11-28 21:28:36+00:00): hi. you changed here the position of nodes that define province borders, nodes that fall in the sea. what is the source you used? you only state the imagery used.  so how could you correct the position of these nodes?
Trevor_1 (2021-11-29 01:25:50+00:00): I was trying to make the boundary more smooth. I admit I shouldn't have done it without a source, but this was a year ago, so please don't get mad at me for it. I haven't been making any more edits in Panama, and I won't unless you need me to correct something. Feel free to revert or change any of my edits that you don't like.
Trevor_1 (2021-11-29 01:44:01+00:00): Here's a website where you can revert changes. However it doesn't always work, but sometimes does. http://revert.osmz.ru/
Trevor_1 (2022-11-16 23:04:07+00:00): I finally fixed this boundary according to the coordinates from https://www.asamblea.gob.pa/APPS/LEGISPAN/PDF_NORMAS/2010/2013/2013_607_0752.pdf
mueschel (2020-10-28 14:16:29+00:00): I don't think maxspeed and capacity tags are the right way to add old, outdated inscriptions to the database.

By the way, the sign doesn't limit the number of horses galloping across the bridge! It's just forbidden to lead/drive them over the bridge.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-10-28 15:27:55+00:00): old, outdated inscriptions - do you think that this sign lost its legal meaning?
Minh Nguyen (2020-10-28 18:00:26+00:00): Certainly, there was a bit of whimsy to the city posting this sign when opening the bridge in 1983, but it is serious enough to be mapped in OSM based on what we currently know. I’ll humor you with my best understanding of the situation, though I’m by no means a lawyer, and OSM’s general disclaimer particularly applies in ambiguous cases like this. [1]

First of all, it’s pretty unlikely that someone would be cited or taken to court for merely driving too many beasts of burden across it or allowing them to run rampant. However, local authorities do take people to court for damaging bridges with their vehicles or loads, especially if it involves a historic bridge structure or an egregious violation. In such a case, this sign might be considered as prima facie evidence in favor of a restriction, though there would be mitigating factors.

Strongsville ordinance 434.05 authorizes the city to enforce a speed limit on this bridge, and it doesn’t limit that authority to motorized vehicles. [2] Other ordinances cover wonton disregard for the safety of property when operating a vehicle. The Cuyahoga County board of county commissioners or Cleveland Metroparks may have also issued a relevant ordinance or order.

A defendant might be able to argue that the sign doesn’t conform to the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (OMUTCD), as authorized by the Ohio Revised Code section 4511.11. [3] That alone doesn’t automatically make the sign unenforceable: after all, there are plenty of nonstandard traffic signs all over the state, especially at parks and airports. But a defendant might claim that the sign’s contents and construction are so unusual that the sign appears to be decorative. I’m not familiar enough with case law to know how much weight that argument would carry.

This sign isn’t entirely hypothetical. It’s effectively a speed limit for users of the nearby Bridle Trail and All-Purpose Trail. It also isn’t unique: an identical sign posted on a covered bridge in Illinois [4], and a street in Neschers, France, also has a walking-speed limit for horses. [5]

As for the distinction between driving a horse and allowing it to gallop unfettered, OSM doesn’t seem to have an established way to tag restrictions or exceptions related to who accompanies a person or vehicle. I’ve encountered plenty of conventional signs that can’t be fully tagged for this reason. [6]

Given the ambiguity of the situation, I was inclined to map the sign and its ostensible effect based on the on-the-ground rule and rely on end users to determine the level of risk they’d want to incur by violating the signposted restriction.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disclaimer
[2] https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/strongsville/latest/strongsville_oh/0-0-0-32199
[3] http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/4511.11
[4] http://geographicallyyours.blogspot.com/2019/07/princeton-illinois-usa.html
[5] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137321605
[6] https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ONdQuzIu5wDqamt8s-esuw
pio2_122 (2020-10-26 08:12:25+00:00): Hej,
wydaje mi się, że te numery nie powinny być w nazwie, a w tagu local_ref -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:local_ref
Mariusz_Wxxx (2020-10-26 14:03:50+00:00): Nie, nie ma jednolitego standardu. Można je  umieszczać w nazwie, bo numer stanowiska rzeczywiście wchodzi w skład nazwy przystanku. Spójrz np. na przystanki w Warszawie.
pio2_122 (2020-10-26 15:02:31+00:00): Faktycznie, też o tym pomyślałem.
Czyli w terenie występują nazwy razem z numerem? - Jeśli tak, to nie ma problemu :)
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:02:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93033126
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:01:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93033193
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:02:13+00:00): The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93033193
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:00:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93033280
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:58:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93033376
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:58:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93033383
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-12 06:25:11+00:00): Note node duplicates: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8045618254 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7915146098

Can you fix it in your imports?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-12 06:27:58+00:00): BTW, where this import was discussed?

It is a good idea to link Wiki documentation page in changeset tags (doable in JOSM)
ZeLonewolf (2021-08-12 13:30:33+00:00): Thanks for noting these issues (and comments on other changesets), I'll be starting to work through these areas and address problems noted.
freeExec (2020-10-27 08:23:19+00:00): Объединение кусков ЛЭП в одну потом негативно сказывается на работе с данными. Вырезаешь регион, а у тебя усы во все стороны из него торчат.
stargunru (2020-10-27 21:00:19+00:00): Ну и пусть торчат, зато сразу видно куда и откуда идёт
Firemix (2020-10-26 02:24:29+00:00): Hi Brian,

is there any information on this import at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Rhode_Island ?

Kind regards,
Firemix
ZeLonewolf (2020-10-26 02:52:29+00:00): I have added this information.
naveenpf (2020-10-30 15:13:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93034332
vysakh r k (2020-10-31 08:46:08+00:00): all ready a member sir
aweech (2020-10-26 17:28:12+00:00): Hi,
You undid a bunch of the fixes I made from the last time you made edits here, so now I'll point them out to you: 
* The tag golf=lateral_water_hazard does not belong on the entire Ashuelot River. You could partition the river area so that the part within the golf course has that tag, but it does not belong on the entire length from Surry Mountain Lake to Keene.
* You deleted the correctly mapped pond with an island near the parking lot on East Surry Road and replaced it with a solid natural=water area again.
* You changed the outline of the Ashuelot River to make it wider than even during high water season
* You deleted a carefully drawn wetland and replaced it with a water hazard. In OSM a wetland refers to a wet area often covered in mosses and other water-loving vegetation. Only open water gets the natural=water tag.

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwater and related pages for more information on mapping water features.
literan (2020-10-26 15:31:52+00:00): покемономусор откачен. Не стоило тратить время