piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Владимир К (2017-01-20 12:38:48+00:00): Круглосуточно обозначается 24/7. Как так-то?
mapper999 (2017-01-22 18:55:49+00:00): Was meinst du mit "falsch beschrieben"? Es gibt hier definitv einen Parkplatz, der auch korrekt als "privat" gekennzeichnet war.
mavl (2017-10-14 09:28:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-01-20 08:00:56+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467376980 - sugeruję tagować poprawnie.
geodreieck4711 (2017-01-24 00:40:38+00:00): wieder selbstüberschneidende Linien, Herr Oberförster.....
mavl (2017-10-14 09:28:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-17 20:10:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4620095813/history - have you meant shop=watches here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dwatches
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:55:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-14 09:29:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
热血BUG男 (2019-06-27 08:06:34+00:00): 我是这个村子的人，现在很多地方包括政府地址簿上都写的葛云村，但是我们村里的人祖祖辈辈都叫他葛家营。
mavl (2017-10-14 09:29:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
Alexander-II (2017-01-20 07:23:05+00:00): Такая точка уже есть.
eugene-lisovskiy (2017-01-20 11:28:32+00:00): Да, я её сам уже потер, спасибо.
Qwertii (2017-03-30 06:06:45+00:00): What is the source of this data? Did you go out and see it or pull it from a dataset?
mavl (2017-10-14 09:29:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:48:48+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2018-01-06 22:05:41+00:00): I have revert your changeset.
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:48:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Alexander-II (2017-01-20 07:17:51+00:00): Барбарис там не находится, судя по сайту. И старопрамен оттуда никуда не делся, тоже судя по сайту. Откатываю это изменение.
Felis Pimeja (2017-01-20 10:36:46+00:00): Я мимо него  хожу каждое утро, поэтому накатываю обратно.
Alexander-II (2017-01-20 10:43:04+00:00): Уверены, что на 2 брестской? На официальном сайте у него адрес 2 тверская-ямская / чаянова http://barbariscafe.ru/kontaktyi.html Там есть точка http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4376349001
Панорамы от 6 октября 2016 подтверждают
Felis Pimeja (2017-01-20 11:14:38+00:00): Уверен.
https://goo.gl/photos/dscN8tLNw7a5z5Fo8
Alexander-II (2017-01-20 18:56:33+00:00): Спасибо, что пояснили.
mavl (2017-10-14 09:29:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:21:16+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2017-01-20 18:00:21+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-14 09:28:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:24:34+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467385450
has no tags. What is it?
mavl (2019-01-14 16:37:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-14 09:29:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
mavl (2017-10-14 09:29:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:42:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-14 16:37:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-14 16:38:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:41:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-14 09:28:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
mavl (2017-10-14 09:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
Alexander-II (2017-01-21 06:47:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Скажите, дома, которые на территории стройки, уже построены или только строятся? Так же обратите внимание, что при указании корпуса в адресе точка не нужна - просто "14 к5"
usr1 (2017-01-21 18:39:55+00:00): Здравствуйте, заселение началось примерно месяц назад, почти все корпуса сданы. Спасибо что поправили.
Osm1980 (2017-01-27 15:59:29+00:00): سلام پاساژ پلاسکو چرا حذف کردید؟
Peda_repair (2017-01-31 22:54:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45699753 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user البدري due to unfounded deletions (please discuss before you delete existing data)
Peda_repair (2017-01-31 22:54:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45699753 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user البدري due to unfounded deletions (please discuss before you delete existing data)
Commodoortje (2017-01-20 18:17:30+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Remco W (2017-01-20 18:27:41+00:00): Dankje, ik ging meteen de mist in. de zuiderMRKT is niet zichtbaar op de standaard kaart van OpenStreetMap dus ik dacht; mooie om als eerste actie te doen.

Pas later zag ik dat hij er dus al was maar niet zichtbaar als je niet in Edit mode zit.

Kortom ik heb deze weer weg gegooid en degene die er al stond aangepast aan de werkelijkheid.

Maar goed, ik zie hem nog steeds niet als ik niet in edit mode zit. Klopt dat?
Commodoortje (2017-01-20 19:59:27+00:00): Klopt,
Je moet namelijk oppassen dat je niet gaat mappen voor de renderer.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

In dit voorbeeld is het netjes op te lossen door de bestaande polygon (area=yes
highway=pedestrian) samen te voegen met de markt polygon.
inmiddels heb ik dit voor je gedaan.
Dit soort mutaties hebben een leercurve, die niet in één dag is aan te leren.
Mocht je situaties hebben die je niet kunt oplossen, vraag het dan gerust op het NL talige forum. Hier zul je geholpen worden met oplossingen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Remco W (2017-01-20 20:26:23+00:00): Dank weer voor je uitleg. Uiteindelijk ging ik dus van start met een feature die blijkbaar al niet helemaal goed was. (Vandaar dat ik hem al over het hoofd had gezien en ik enthousiast een eigen feature neerzette).
Ondertussen had ik wel al gevonden dat een markt een area (en geen point) moest zijn. Dat had ik dus al aangepast. (en de beschrijving). Verder was ik nog niet gekomen.

Nogmaals dank en ik ga de wiki en het forum eens doornemen.

Fijn project is dit.
Peda_repair (2017-01-31 22:54:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45699753 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user البدري due to unfounded deletions (please discuss before you delete existing data)
Martin Borsje (2017-01-30 17:07:58+00:00): 'Beste

Je hebt op dit pad äccess=no" gezet dat betekent dat er niemand overheen mag.

Ik neem aan dat het een voetpad betreft.

Dat tag je als highway=footway

Alle 'no' kunnen er dan af.

Ik heb het aangepast.

Groet
mavl (2017-10-14 09:29:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
Peda_repair (2017-01-31 22:54:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45699753 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user البدري due to unfounded deletions (please discuss before you delete existing data)
Peda_repair (2017-01-31 22:55:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45699753 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user البدري due to unfounded deletions (please discuss before you delete existing data)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-03-18 15:17:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148822076 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some anti-Mormon vandalism and other rubbish
christofhapp16 (2017-01-20 09:17:44+00:00): Das war mein Kommentar zur anderen Änderung... Eben diesen Steig gibt es! Ich hab ihn jetzt vorübergehend nach bestem ermessen eingezeichnet, wird mit GPS aktualisiert!
mavl (2017-10-14 09:29:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:34:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
BCNorwich (2017-01-22 08:55:59+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've had a close look at the ways you've recently added to the database.
I removed several bridleways as they were duplication's of existing ways and are not bridleways in their own right. I re-tagged highways where appropriate to include bridle status. I joined up and adjusted several ways.
There are problems still where your paths go over water.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2017-01-22 09:00:25+00:00): Way: 467433785 can you really walk that line and does it join the road at north?
telmocosta (2017-01-22 20:58:02+00:00): Yes you can walk 467433785 and it joins the road at north. although i haven't crossed that path yet. Thanks for your help, I have laid down plenty of path for my walk, I am not experienced in drawing footpaths.
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:33:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Commodoortje (2017-01-20 18:30:24+00:00): Ik heb de openingstijd aangepast conform OSM format.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0e2hmac8wrnzs7c/2017-01-20_19-29-09.png?raw=1
Hier kun je meer lezen over openingstijden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:33:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-14 09:28:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:33:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-20 16:37:48+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ist bereits als Punkt eingetragen: http://www.osm.org/node/242848076. Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Punkte / Wege , die nur einen Namen besitzen sind sinnlos. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a .
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:31:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
gpstracks (2017-01-24 07:37:25+00:00): Buongiorno.
Volevo informarla che in Openstreetmap è fortemente sconsigliato inserire abbreviazioni nei nomi.
La prego gentilmente di correggere tali modifiche.
Grazie
gileri (2017-01-29 22:32:18+00:00): Hello,
Opening hours in OpenStreetMap must follow the format described here :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
This let other applications such as GPS display them nicely and know whether the POI is open at the moment.
Goufre (2017-02-05 11:53:04+00:00): I have changed the opening hours to the required format
gileri (2017-02-15 18:04:27+00:00): Nice, thanks !
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:25:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-14 09:29:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:17:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:17:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:17:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
gileri (2017-01-29 14:25:44+00:00): Hello,

Opening hours in OpenStreetMap must follow the format described here :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

This let other applications such as GPS display them nicely and know whether the POI is open at the moment.
Goufre (2017-02-05 11:38:08+00:00): I have changed the opening hours in the required format
gileri (2017-02-15 18:04:00+00:00): Nice, thanks !
mavl (2017-10-14 09:29:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52918300 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45296034].
Ogmios (2017-01-30 15:08:32+00:00): 👍
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:11:11+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
gileri (2017-01-29 14:20:18+00:00): Hello, you also created a tourism=information in the same building, I assume you would want to merge them ?
Goufre (2017-02-05 11:29:34+00:00): I have merged the tourism-information with the building
gileri (2017-02-15 18:03:49+00:00): Nice, thanks !
Владимир К (2017-05-03 08:02:12+00:00): а там где вы ставите bicycle=yes есть велодорожки/разметка?
Velopapa (2017-05-03 10:19:37+00:00): нет, разметки нет. Я отмечал возможность проезда и соответственно, чтобы при отрисовке велокарты их было видно. Посмотрел в вики, похоже это распространенная ошибка. Рядом много похожих дорог. Как правильно отмечать лесную дорогу? Как отметить узкую лесную тропу, по которой можно проехать на велосипеде и по которой нельзя проехать(много поваленых деревьев)?
Владимир К (2017-05-03 10:55:34+00:00): тропа - highway=path+surface=ground+width=[число в метрах]

какого-то специального способа указать что вот эта тропка предпочтительна для велосипеда вроде и нет(тут же возникает вопрос для какого велосипеда? для какого стиля езды? а то был деятель, в Крыму на даунхильных и КК трассах везде проставил bicycle=yes) Если только не использовать mtb:* теги.
Ну или полулегальный способ - нанести маршруты через отношения. Но строго говоря, они должны быть официальными или хотя бы в каком-то велоклубе/велосообществе описаны, а не просто хорошие дорожки.
 Да, вокруг полно bicycle=yes. И я много снёс их, где точно знал что это обычные тротуары/тропы. Почти все в балашихе лежали еще с 2010-11 года, проставленные одним человеком.

И спасибо, за ваш ответ. Приятно разговаривать с адекватным человеком :)
d1g (2017-05-03 15:30:24+00:00): Надумаете проходимость отмечать - есть тег http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:obstacle
Velopapa (2017-05-04 08:01:58+00:00): а он обычно учитывается при отрисовке велокарт и при авто прокладывании маршрутов?
Владимир К (2017-05-04 11:03:59+00:00): скорее нет, чем да. но тег хороший :)
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:23:27+00:00): 
恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
mavl (2017-10-14 07:57:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52916830 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45325511].
user_5359 (2017-01-20 17:02:06+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
apm-wa (2017-04-11 12:43:46+00:00): Correct address of the Oncology Center is Arcabil sayoly 22, and the address should be selected from the dropdown menu, not typed in, so that applications (such as MAPS.ME) that use these data can route properly.