piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
❤️‍🔥 (2021-06-12 04:56:04+00:00): I think 'Christian Church' is more specific than 'Church Building', but I agree it's a bit confusing here. 

As long as you use a red-coloured option for buildings it's fine. Another way to find out is to scroll to the bottom of the side bar and look at the 'Tags' section. If it has building=yes, then you know it's a type of building
Electrician02041735970 (2021-06-12 12:00:13+00:00): Thanks, will try to edit the tag next time be by the PC
user_8655426 (2021-06-22 09:06:23+00:00): こんにちは。
Google Maps からの情報転載はやめてください。
最近、県西部に短期間で広範囲にわたり大量のPOIを追加されていますが、名称が不自然なもの、おかしなものが非常に多いです。

・名称に全角英数字、全角かっこ、㈱、(特養)、支店名などが含まれるPOIは、Google Maps のものと一致しています。実際に現地調査をされたのかもしれませんが、Google での名称をコピーし、OSMの name にペーストしているのは明白です。

・地蔵尊、薬師堂など、固有の名称がつけられていないものは、Google Maps の名称と一致しています。

・浜松いわた信用金庫(現地表示)を浜松磐田信用金庫としていますが、これも Google と一致しています。

・IDエディタではチェーン店の名称を入力すると、brand などの関連するタグが自動的に追加されます。しかし、支店名ごとコピーしたものを入力しているため、タグが追加されていません。

・その他、POIの名称に関しては、入力ミスなど多数の問題あり。

・名称以外でも、現地調査をしたとは思えない不適切なタグ付けが多数あり。

少し前には掛川市内に大量の飲食店を追加されましたが、それらは「食べログ」あるいは「アットエス」の情報を利用した疑いがあります。

不正に取得してOSMに入力したデータは、すべて削除するようお願いいたします。

利用可能なデータソース
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764

データの情報源「絶対に著作権があるリソースを使わないでください。」
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Beginners_Guide_1.1
user_8655426 (2021-06-24 11:47:15+00:00): 「発生した問題に対処してください。そうしないと、OpenStreetMapの編集がブロックされる可能性があります。」

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3704

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Kohki%20Hiraga/blocks
anebophil (2021-06-10 18:02:06+00:00): Thanks for the error correction
anebophil (2021-06-10 18:02:30+00:00): Thanks for the error correction
syntex (2021-06-10 14:20:05+00:00): Atak na mój region : o
Sinus Pi (2021-06-10 17:19:55+00:00): Ano atak, a co? :P  Ścieżki przy stawie były trochę nierówno, a przy blokach wydeptane dróżki na trawnikach były footwayami a nie pathami, gdy zwykle wydeptaki to raczej ścieżki.
Ale generalnie to ilość płotów i bramek bardzo zacna. :)
syntex (2021-06-10 17:40:19+00:00): Żartuję oczywiście. Zapraszam tutaj na częstsze edycje : )
PT-53 (2021-06-26 06:13:05+00:00): Hallo FloToHu,
diese beiden Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8820936183/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8781330172/history
liegen direkt übereinander und haben die gleichen Merkmale.
keep right:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=128964814

Kann man die nicht verschmelzen?
Grüße
FloToHu (2021-06-28 11:13:21+00:00): Verschmelzen/Löschen. Ja. Hat mir Osmose in Vespucci letztlich angemerkt, aber wollte es mobil am Handy nicht löschen. Hatte da mal Ebenen kopiert und da waren die Türen in den Knoten dann doppelt. Den hab ich woh vergessen zu löschen.
Inzwischen verhindere ich das über Filter beim Kopieren.
user_5239402 (2021-06-11 07:24:40+00:00): 안녕하세요. 인도 혹은 보도에 이름을 기입하지 마세요. 도로에 (~~자전거길)이란 이름을 추가하지 마세요. 이름은 공식적인것을 적어야 합니다. name 태그에 괄호 등으로 이름이 아닌 것에 대한 설명을 넣지 않습니다. name 태그에는 해당 지물의 소유권자가 공식적으로 발표한 이름을 넣고, 만약 공식적인 이름을 찾을 수 없으면 해당 지물의 이름을 표기한 표지판에 적인 이름을 넣습니다. 그것도 없으면 지역 사람들이 부르는 이름을 넣습니다. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names)

그리고 자전거 도로의 이름은 되도록이면 위에 있는 수칙대로 적으세요.
ZeLonewolf (2021-06-12 01:17:37+00:00): Hello, pravinmyerapale. It appears that this is an alternate account of pravinyerapale and that you're mapping/importing bus routes as part of an organized editing activity. OSM's Data Working Group (DWG) reached out to your other account two weeks ago (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/pravinyerapale/blocks) and requested that your document your activities in accordance with OSM's organized editing guides.

To be clear, I expect that the US community is fine with bus routes being added, provided that the data is (1) accurate and (2) comes from a source that is compliant with OSM's license limitations.

We ask again for you to communicate with our community and tell us where this data comes from and document your process so quality assurance can be done.

If you continue to be unresponsive, we will have no choice but to request that the DWG revert all of your changes, in bulk, since we would not be able to ascertain whether this data is compliant and therefore would have no choice but to ask for it to be removed.

Again, we are perfectly happy to have you contribute bus route information, but please communicate and work with the community so we can all be on the same page and make sure that this data is okay to use!

If you would prefer, you can contact the US community on Slack (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) or on the talk-us mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us)

Thanks!
Brian
eggie (2021-06-10 16:57:24+00:00): Dag M Keizer..
Wanneer de wegen opengesteld zijn dan ook de specificatie weghalen construction=residential.
Het is immers geen construction meer.
Geen oneway=no op reguliere gaan taggen svp.
Waar zou dat hier nuttig voor kunnen zijn?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106155701

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-10 17:01:12+00:00): De Anna Maria van Cappellenpark  eindigt op een stukje wandelpad?
Kunnen fietsers daar niet komen van het Couwenhoekpad? 

Is het fietspad hier verplaatst?
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-06-10 17:02:06+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk maar komen auto's dan op de Anna Maria van Cappellenpark
Er is nergens een verbinding met andere wegen?
eggie (2021-06-10 17:06:53+00:00): Ik heb even geholpen en het geheel routeerbaar gemaakt. Je moet maar eens kijken straks.
gr eggie
❤️‍🔥 (2021-06-10 22:03:55+00:00): You have added oneway=yes to https://osm.org/way/951815810. On Maxar Premium Imagery, you can see the road markings that show that this is a two way road. Why did you change it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106155990
❤️‍🔥 (2021-06-10 23:32:34+00:00): same with all the other service roads here. and why did you delete the drop-off road?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106155990
Electrician02041735970 (2021-06-11 11:30:49+00:00): The road behind campus is a one-way road.

Drop-off road is in front of entrance. It is on a map
❤️‍🔥 (2021-06-11 22:16:29+00:00): this section of the road: https://osm.org/way/951815810 is not oneway. And I think the other entrance is also not oneway but I can't remember
Electrician02041735970 (2021-06-12 01:21:03+00:00): Thank you for your attention, fixed the issues
mavl (2021-06-11 15:07:41+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это пакет правок добавляет новые дороги поверх существующих. Например, Омский проезд был добавлен поверх существующей лесной дороги. Это ошибка топологии. Нужно было разрезать лесную дорогу на части и указать для этих частей новые свойства (теги): названия, другой статус дороги и тому подобное.
Arnaud Champollion (2021-06-10 16:51:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Suggestion : la bâtiment "WC" ne devrait pas s'appeler "WC" (donc enlever "WC" du champ "nom". Mais plutôt être qualifié de WC (chercher la catégorie "toilettes"). Il sera alors rendu par le pictogramme dédié et sera listé lors d'une recherche de ce type d'objets.
Si tu as des questions ou si tu as besoin d'accompagnement pour compléter l'école n'hésite pas on peut prendre un moment ensemble pour le faire.
Arnaud
flohoff (2021-06-10 12:56:11+00:00): Moin

was ist das denn für ein weg? Und warum access=no? Damit darf doch da niemand durch? Und path erlaubt normalerweise Fahrrad und Fußgänger - nix anderes. Also ich halte hier access=no für kaputt. Wie ist das denn beschildert?

Ach ja - Und width=0? Existiert der gar nicht?

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106156424
eggie (2021-06-10 16:27:37+00:00): 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... Niet correct..
Het was hier al goed getgad als seamark:name=Blauwe Hand, 

Wat is je bedoeling
Op het wegdeel kun je wel 
bridge:name=.......   als extra name=Veneweg.
en/of de brug verder intekeken als man_made=bride layer=1 en daar de naam opzetten.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community 

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106156512
eggie (2021-06-10 16:30:26+00:00): Hier een voorbeeld hoe een combinatie te maken met man_made=bridge
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.81056/4.65167
mapse
eggie
eggie (2021-06-10 20:56:22+00:00): name=  kun je overigens laten staan. Ik zie dat op meer plaatsen.

MVG
eggie
A_loud_Umlaut (2021-06-11 12:21:19+00:00): De brug heet de Blauwe Handbrug, die naam wil ik graag toevoegen, op welke plek kan ik dat het beste doen?
eggie (2021-06-11 12:27:38+00:00): Wanneer je het toevoegt als bridge:name=Blauwe Handbrug komt de naam in de data maar zie je niets renderen
De straat heet immers Veneweg.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name

Je kunt ook nog extra  een man_made=bridge intekenen met layer=1  en dan zet je daar de naam op.. Zie voorbeeld van de Zwijndrechtsebrug. 
Dat rendert wel op de kaart als naam. 
De brug moet verbonden zijn met de eindnodes van de weg. Dat niet de wegdelen splitsen, want er lopen -tig routerelaties en die gaan stuk als je daar met een simpele editor als iD in gaat knippen. 
Probeer de brug maar in te tekenen zonder aan de wegdelen te knippen.
.. en dan zet je daar de naam op.
eggie
eggie (2021-06-11 12:32:10+00:00): Hier vlakbij een voorbeeld van een brug als vlak https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.66330/6.10088
Joey Samson (2021-06-10 12:43:30+00:00): Bataan districts please
kartler175 (2021-06-18 05:53:11+00:00): Wenn löschen, dann bitte auch die gesamte Relation:, nicht nur Teile davon.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.12451&lat=54.30733&zoom=15&opacity=0.95
Siehe auch oben den Fehlerhinweis zum Änderungsstz.

Geleiches für https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106158550#map=12/54.4063/13.0387
locke (2021-06-18 18:57:53+00:00): Danke für die Info, hab ich entfernt.
kartonage (2021-06-10 14:49:45+00:00): Hej,

please don't delete data randomly.

See https://osmcha.org/changesets/106159292/

Эй,

пожалуйста, не удаляйте данные случайным образом.

См. Https://osmcha.org/changesets/106159292/
user_5359 (2021-06-12 05:25:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/18h9. I assume copy&paste error
opendcc (2021-06-10 14:12:27+00:00): Das dürfte passen. Vorher war es ja grade2 (also gut fahrbar), grade4 ist schon recht holter-di-polter und man kann auch mal in der Mitte aufsetzen.
abbeDe (2021-06-10 14:36:03+00:00): Danke!
hqs-plus (2022-02-23 17:21:25+00:00): Hallo, kann es sein, dass du das Windrad https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3187709829 aus Versehen verschoben hast bei der Bearbeitung? Im Luftbild sieht es eher so aus als wäre es an der alten Stelle weiter östlich.
Arminus (2021-06-15 14:53:32+00:00): Hallo. Ich habe dieses NSG auf Wunsch das DAVs NRW gemappt, welcher mir ein offizielles Protokoll unter Beteiligung der Naturschutzbehörde Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis und expliziter Ausweisung des NSGs "Felsen am Harkortsee" zur Verfügung gestellt hat. Link zum Protokoll (mit Karte) per OSM Nachricht.

Daher bitte ich diese Löschung wieder rückgängig zu machen.
Arminus (2021-06-16 09:54:32+00:00): Siehe auch https://sessionnet.krz.de/en-kreis/bi/getfile.asp?id=12923&type=do - außerdem gibt es vor Ort zwei entsprechende Schilder.
Arminus (2021-06-16 14:17:09+00:00): Nach allseitiger Rücksprache, revert dieses Changsets in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106473916
eggie (2021-06-10 16:47:24+00:00): Dag Roel

Dan dus nu 
highway=construction
construction=residential (niet proposed)

Pas je het zelf aan?

MVG
eggie
ROELart (2021-06-10 17:00:47+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Ik heb geprobeerd om het juist aan te geven, maar ben nog niet zo thuis in de juiste naamgeving. Op mijn mobiel kan ik de naamgeving niet aanpassen.
eggie (2021-06-10 17:46:16+00:00): Het heeft geen haast.. Dan doe je dat gewoon later.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-06-10 16:53:14+00:00): Oke.. maar hier spreken de tags elkaar tegen.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106160992

HenkL (lokale mapper) geeft aan fietspad
Jij maakt er residential van met een verkeersbord verplicht fietspad.
Ik zal het verwijderen.
Welke straatnaam?
Gr eggie
ROELart (2021-06-10 16:58:42+00:00): Straatnaam: Pijlkruid.
Ik kijk vanuit mijn huis uit op deze situatie. Dit wegdeel is geen fietspad, maar straks de ontsluiting van het Pijlkruid.
eggie (2021-06-10 17:45:33+00:00): Oke.. Dan kun je het zelf aanpassen
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2021-06-10 16:50:18+00:00): Steeds toevoegen
de specificatie.. Dat een aanwijzing voor een volgende mapper
dus
construction=residential

Zijn het nog plannen da
proposed=residential
gr eggie
ROELart (2021-06-10 17:01:48+00:00): Op mijn telefoon kan ik de specificatie niet aanpassen.
eggie (2021-06-10 17:47:01+00:00): Ook van later zorg...
eggie (2021-06-10 19:25:40+00:00): aangepast
eggie (2021-06-10 16:48:31+00:00): Dan dus de regel verwijderen
construction=residential
Dat was de specificatie..

Pas je het aan?
Gr Eggie
ROELart (2021-06-10 17:02:27+00:00): Op mijn telefoon kan ik de specificatie niet aanpassen.
eggie (2021-06-10 17:48:06+00:00): Oke.. hier heb ik het aangepast..
gr eggie
gbragaalves (2021-06-15 23:05:51+00:00): Hello.

Regarding your edition, I would like to warn you that breaking ways may break bus routes as well. Please check if you are breaking routes and avoid leaving any route broken, please.

Thank you.
CostelloMellow (2021-06-16 15:48:32+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. We do work to ensure that we do not break any existing relations. Could you point out the specific way or relation so I can make sure I address it correctly? Thank you.
dgitto (2021-06-11 05:57:40+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2021-06-11 06:01:27+00:00): c'è un errore di battitura sul sentiero
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/953041608
Comunque il tag NAME si deve usare solo se un oggetto ha un *nome proprio*.
"sentiero da depuratore a strada comunale montalbano-braidi" non mi sembra davvero il nome proprio (leggibile su qualche cartello in loco o rintracciabile su qualche ordinanza etc). vedi il wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Pippo Currenti (2021-06-11 06:22:48+00:00): Ok, grazie, scusa per la mia inesperienza. C'è un tratto che non è tracciato sulla mappa e che vorrei classificare.
dgitto (2021-06-11 10:28:53+00:00): non ti devi scusare, l'importante è iniziare a mappare! poi si impara tutto pian piano
Glassman (2021-06-11 18:46:42+00:00): #TIP: driveways are considered private so adding access-private is somewhat redundant.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106162853
voschix (2024-01-10 22:45:46+00:00): Canaletta Pisani needs corrections. I started to correct the geometry, but stopped, when I noticed it has layer=-1 over the entre length. Also the available satellite imagery is not good enough to complete the corrections. Maybe you have a better data source,
jmty8 (2024-01-11 07:19:36+00:00): Hi voschix, even if it's an old edit - I can see in osmcha, that this part of Canaletta Pisani that seems like I've created is just a part of this way https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/245199522 that I split. Layer=-1 was originally by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SldrHartman. But I can see that at some points it was marked as layer=-1 to not make bridges for roads that it crossed. 
Hope it helps. 
Best regards, Jane
Glassman (2021-06-11 18:47:43+00:00): In this case, I would agree adding access=private is appropriate because of the gate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106163281
Glassman (2021-06-11 18:51:16+00:00): #TIP: service roads don't need to be connected to the parking lot. I know the editor likes to connect features. I try to keep them separate if they are different types of objects.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106163502
frodrigo (2021-06-28 13:04:32+00:00): Bonjour. Pourquoi passer les zones submersibles au tour de l'ïle d'Aix en sable plutôt que de les garder en natural=wetland + wetland=tidalflat ? C'est de la vase et pas du sable.
djo_man (2021-06-28 13:57:57+00:00): Bonjour. Toute la zone autour de l'ile etait en tidalflat sans discernement de roche, de sable, de vase. Le modèle Tidalflat imposé par 1 personne bien placé au board international qui fait du lobyying pour ce modèle (il doit pas etre ni marin ni utilisateur de l'estran) ne tient pas compte de complexité des fonds marins. Car le tidalflat en anglais est une zone plate qui ne cherche pas à différentier les fonds (sable, vase ou mix), ce n'est pas adapté pour les rochers les plages, les estran de plage, le zone de vase des estuaires (qui sont clairement natural=mud+tidal=yes). 
la zone su est de l'ile est effectivement plus de la vase. natural=mud+tidal=yes serait tres bien et à l'avantage d'etre rendu sur la carte. 
pour info, il y a une petite levé de bouclier sur la liste FR en ce qui concerne la personne du board international qui malgré tout continue de favoriser ce modèle incomplet et imprécis (à l'anglaise ) et de plus cette personne est aussi celle qui fait le rendu de la mer. il refuse de rendre les tidal=yes volontairement mais ce n'est plus tenable car l'estran est complexe et merite d'exister sur OSM. 

nota: j'ai fait la modif pour la zone sud est. les 2 autres zone nord ouest et ouest sont plus du sable non ? (en fait je ne m'en rappelle plus, c'etait il y à 20 ans...)
G1asshouse (2021-06-19 08:21:51+00:00): I disagree with the change from service to unclassified road. Mainly, but not exclusively because of the usage of unclassified, as described in the wiki to be: "highway=unclassified is used for minor public roads". This is not a public road. It is a way managed by the University and not by the City. Additionally, these ways are part of a network of ways which primarily service the parking areas of the University's sports facilities. Service to the light rail station is secondary. Maybe I'm incorrect. What do you think?
austinsnow (2021-07-22 14:56:21+00:00): That is a fair critique, given their main use is for servicing the stadiums/parking/light rail. I'm fine with it changed back to service road. I need to remind myself that not all service roads are tiny backways, but can look like this.

Though I would say that the light rail is absolutely a primary use of the roads now. The sports facilities are used intermittently, whereas the light rail station is in constant use.
G1asshouse (2021-07-26 00:38:54+00:00): You might be correct about the roadway being used primarily for the  light rail station, I can only speak from my personal experiance.
What I have noticed, the overwhelming majority of light rail riders access the station from either foot traffic (from the U-District/Montlake) or from the transit depot, across the street.
I believe the use of the sports complex will increase dramatically once UW is fully open and has a full student body on campus.
That's just my opinion though.
austinsnow (2021-07-26 02:11:14+00:00): Yeah, that's an opinion, for sure. Even when the stadium is more in use, it is used very sporadically, whereas the light rail station is used constantly. And of course "percentage of light rail riders that use the road" has nothing to do "percentage of road users that use the light rail".
G1asshouse (2021-07-26 08:51:52+00:00): "Yeah, that's an opinion, for sure."
Don't be an asshole.

highway=unclassified clearly states it is for public road ways. UW (like all public schools) is semi-public land. The roads, including this one, are not technically public. The University is well within it's rights to bar all non-university traffic.
Unclassified is intended for roads that are below tertiary yet above residential and survice roads. They often linking road ways such as city centers. In a urban setting they are sometimes used for linking roads in industrial or commercial areas. This road is very much an end of destination road.

"And of course...has nothing to do.."
I agree with your words. I disagree with your passive aggressive intent. I'm dumbfounded by your incredibly incorrect interpenetration of what I was saying. I assumed you could deduce on your own, that my observation has been, more road traffic is for the sports complex then the light rail station. (not just the stadium, during game day...what do you think all those other facilities are for?  gyms / pools / tracks / courts / rowing house / and many others.)

Thank you for changing it back to a service road. Please, leave the disrespect, arrogance, and dismissive attitude out of this project.
austinsnow (2021-07-26 13:34:08+00:00): We agree on the details here. We shouldn't get bogged down any further. I will attempt in my other thread to be more respectful.
dieterdreist (2021-08-02 14:52:11+00:00): Zu einer dieser Änderungen wird gerade hier diskutiert: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73446
ALu68 (2021-06-11 06:38:22+00:00): Hallo TheNewCivilian,

Du hast eine Linie der Bergheimer Straße geteilt. Bekommst du im ID keine Warnung, dass die Reihenfolge von Routen-Relationen nicht korrekt sind?

Es ist hier gelb markiert: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-AVV-Analysis.diff.html#A2.2.5
Jedoch nur heute - ich habe es gefixt.

Gruß. Andre
TheNewCivilian (2021-06-11 09:03:10+00:00): Hallo Andre,
danke für die Überprüfung und Korrektur! Tatsächlich wurde mir in ID kein Fehler angezeigt. Werde in Zukunft die Reihenfolge der Relationen vor Upload genauer prüfen. Werde mich wohl schneller in JSOM einlernen müssen, die Abfolgevisualisierung in ID von Relationen ist wirklich stark mangelhaft.
ALu68 (2021-06-11 18:04:18+00:00): Alles klar.
hoancat (2021-06-10 17:57:27+00:00): Bien vu, le catalan m'a absorbé au point d'en oublier le français.
LySioS (2021-06-10 18:17:01+00:00): J'avais déjà voulu renseigner les noms de la rue il y a qq temps. J'ai vite abandonné entre les peixoneres sans i ou avec i, l'article las sur les panneaux mais les sur le cadastre... sans parler du mix fr/ca 😅 je me suis dit qu'il y avait sûrement des subtilités catalanes et que tu t'en occuperais bien mieux que moi 👍
D'ailleurs, beau boulot pour la traduction des noms de rues. 👏
hoancat (2021-06-10 21:52:17+00:00): C'est vrai que ce n'est pas évident, chaque source a sa propre écriture.

Je pense savoir pourquoi il y a des écritures différentes avec les et las et ei et e.
Le « ei» doit avoir été mis là pour représenter l'accent (comme pour peix) mais c'est une erreur puisque l'écriture « peixoneres » représente déjà cet accent.
Le « les » catalan est souvent retranscrit comme « las » dans les toponymes des Pyrénées-Orientales, par exemple « Las Illas » s'écrit « Les Illes » en catalan. Je dirais que c'est dû au fait que le « e » de « les » en roussillonnais ressemble au « a » français.

Merci, il me reste encore six noms de rue à mettre, je vérifie juste que je ne les ai pas traduits n'importe comment 😅.
mariotomo (2021-06-10 15:40:34+00:00): hi.  this as a follow-up from changeset 82308775.  I would have kept the old "coastline" as tidal flat.  but who knows if the sand bank is still there.
mariotomo (2021-06-10 15:42:05+00:00): (looking at the growing sand bank on the other side, maybe this one really disappeared/moved.)
Anton Khorev (2021-07-05 13:11:40+00:00): Hello  
Why did you change the status of this road from `highway=tertiary` to `highway=primary`?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541828013
Dawid2849 (2021-06-10 18:03:58+00:00): Dzięki :)
eggie (2021-06-10 16:45:07+00:00): Oke Max...  dan nog wel even deze regels verwijderen
oneway:mofa	=no	
oneway:moped=no	

Dat is de uitzondering op oneway voor tweewielers.
Doe je dat zelf?

MVG
eggie
MaxxxxxJ (2021-06-10 17:59:27+00:00): OK, gedaan. Ik heb ook oneway:bicycle verwijderd.
eggie (2021-06-10 18:50:19+00:00): Top! Eigenlijk hoeft oneway=no ook niet.. maar hier wel handig anders tagt iemand anders weet oneway=yes.
Gr eggie
WoodWoseWulf (2021-06-16 00:40:31+00:00): Hi,
You appear to have created an area here that is marked as both water and forest... I'm not too sure if either is correct?
WoodWoseWulf (2021-06-16 00:40:51+00:00): Link for reference:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12833859/history