piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skyper (2022-03-31 12:58:13+00:00): Hey EthoZ
Können wir bitte über die OSM-Daten und bestimmte Objekte sprechen und nicht über die Darstellungen (sprich was daraus gemacht wird).

Den Namen der Haltestelle habe ich verbessert.
Laut Fahrplan und GTFS gibt es bei der Linie 1 am Morgen zwei Fahrten von "Im Häflä", eine davon zur Schule (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/gtfs/DE/single-trip.php?feed=DE-BW-SBG&release_date=&trip_id=2.T0.7-317-j22-1.2.H). Daher hat die Linie auch vier Varianten, siehe route_master (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13984751), jeweils mit genauen Abfahrtszeiten plus Quellenangaben. Ist das etwa falsch?

Zur Lohgerbe (Zugangsbestimmungen):
Was Du schreibst klingt für mich wie:
vehicle=private
vehicle:conditional=delivery @ (06:00-20:00)
bicycle=yes
bus=yes
taxi=yes
Das sollte dann möglichst auf allen Straßenstücken des Bereichs eingetragen werden. Mir ging es ja um den Teil nach der Zufahrt und `vehicle=no`, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162941411 und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331250443. Im Moment wird weder in noch aus der Lohgerbe geroutet, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=47.55372%2C7.94616%3B47.55356%2C7.94722,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=47.55360%2C7.94718%3B47.55321%2C7.94621 oder
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=47.55372%2C7.94616%3B47.55321%2C7.94621.
Für Motorfahrzeuge sieht es noch bescheidener aus.

Grüße skyper
Ethoz (2022-03-31 14:57:41+00:00): Hallo Skyper,
auch laut diesem Plan gibt es morgens tatsächlich einen Bus zur Weihermattenschule:

https://www.wtv-online.de/wtv-wAssets/docs/fahrplaene/7317_H_Normal.pdf

Auf welchem Weg der Bus fährt, weiß ich nicht.

Lohgerbe:
Auf dem von Dir genannten Teil nach der Zufahrt dürfen freileich Motorfahrzeuge fahren. 
Was das Routing dort anbelangt, bin ich überfragt. Vielleicht funktioniert es ja erst mit zeitlichem Verzug zur Kartenbearbeitung.

Zu "vehicle=private" gebe ich zu bedenken, dass weder die Straßen noch die Fahrzeuge privat sind sondern die Zielgrundstücke.

Gruß EthoZ
skyper (2022-03-31 16:46:54+00:00): Ja, ich habe die GTFS-Daten mit den Fahrplänen des WTV abgeglichen, bevor ich die Änderungen eingetragen habe. Sollte bis auf Feinheiten des Fahrwege jetzt stimmen. Danke.

Lohgerbe:
OK, wenn "private" zu strikt ist, können wir uns vielleicht auf "destination" einigen. Ich mag "permit" nicht, da es mMn nicht aussagekräftig ist. Insbesondere wie und an wen die Erlaubnis erteilt wird bleibt offen.
Das Routing ist auf jeden Fall durch "vehicle=no" an den beiden Straßenteilen nördlich des Einkaufszentrum gestört. Da und weiter östlich, inklusive Gerwerbegasse, sollten die gleichen Access-Tags wie an der Einfahrt von NW eingetragen werden.

Ich kann anbieten, das nachher mit "destination", "vehicle:conditional" und dem Rattenschwanz für Bus, Taxi und Fahrrad einzutragen.

Und natürlich hast Du Recht, dass die Routing-Seiten oft einige Zeit brauchen, bis sie die Veränderungen berücksichtigen.
Da bleibt uns wohl nichts anderes übrig als zu warten.

Ciao skyper
Ethoz (2022-04-02 16:23:20+00:00): Hallo Skyper,

"destination" ist o.k.
Bitte die vorgeschlagenen Acces-Änderungen vornehmen.

Zwischenzeitlich geht dort das Routing.

Gruß Ethoz
skyper (2022-04-05 15:50:18+00:00): Hey
Hatte ich schon so weit gemacht. Sollte jetzt soweit alles korrekt sein.
Grüße skyper
Ethoz (2022-04-05 16:09:35+00:00): Super und vielen Dank
EthoZ
Kovoschiz (2022-04-03 10:59:04+00:00): Is this a summit???
nevw (2022-03-23 22:04:54+00:00): Hi
I noticed that you are not using the correct format for phone numbers.
See the Australian guidelines… https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Phone_Numbers
Hans Thompson (2022-03-23 22:59:25+00:00): nice add on the national guard landuse.
PhysicsArmature (2022-03-23 23:14:24+00:00): @Hans Thompson: Thank You, I figured I should mark the area as distinct to aid in navigation and boundary recognition. 

To put it more directly, I am informing people, don't speed down the road next to the National Guard and try to give it some space.
rowcherryrow (2022-03-24 16:40:44+00:00): Correction: Comment should have been "Added a missing service road and updated a roads classification near Abdullah Mubarak Al-Sabah #adt", source used was Esri World Imagery; Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2022-02-28
ivanbranco (2022-10-05 16:24:01+00:00): Ciao mau59,

ho notato solo ora questo edit.

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/942711957

l'area pedonale era corretta prima, ora è collegata alla highway. Adesso è mappato che metà carreggiata è pedonale, quando ovviamente non lo è. Come mai questo edit?
mau59 (2022-10-06 13:16:31+00:00): Ciao ivanbranco.

Certo che era corretta la versione precedente (#1)! Non mi capacito della cosa anche perché non ha senso: dovevo essere molto stanco o che so io. Ti ringrazio, mi scuso e ripristino la versione corretta, approfittando dell'occasione per ridurre l'area dei parcheggi laterali al di sotto dei passaggi pedonali che costeggiano l'area pedonale a nord.
habi (2022-03-25 11:11:05+00:00): Ciao Sangrio

Hallo und Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap, schön machst du hier mit!

Du hast hier in der Gegend die Sportplätze, die Bocciabahn und die Feuerstelle mit Namen eingetragen, was so keinen Sinn macht.
Es ist viel besser, wenn der korrekte `sport`-Tag verwendet wird, dann finden alle sog. Datenkonsumenten die Dinge darüber.
Ich habe mir dir Freiheit herausgenommen, das im Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118904191 zu korrigieren.

Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
cserpell (2022-03-24 17:12:02+00:00): Estimado/a,

Gracias por agregar casas a OpenStreetMap. Por favor asegúrate de hacerlo correctamente, por ejemplo cuadrando los edificios, ya que las formas agregadas no corresponden. Para eso puedes apretar la letra Q en el editor luego de dibujar una casa.

Saludos,
eggie (2022-03-24 06:51:23+00:00): Bonjour Bertrand

Svp.... Veuillez laisser l'adresse intacte la prochaine fois. Je l'ai corrigé.

Greetz,
eggie
BERTRAND-14 (2022-03-24 13:29:13+00:00): C'est noté. Je ne suis pas (encore) expert ;-)))
Merci d'excuser cette erreur (de débutant).
Bien cordialement.
Berrtand.
eggie (2022-03-24 13:38:23+00:00): Pas de problème...  😀
Salut
Eggie
HSL_HRT (2022-03-25 10:47:57+00:00): Sinänsähän tämä aiempi tagitys highway=busway on ihan validi ja voimassaoleva tagi ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=busway?uselang=fi, eli ei siinä mitään vikaa oikeastaan ole. Se on saanut OSM-yhteisöltäkin hyväksyntänsä ... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:highway%3Dbusway
HSL_HRT (2022-03-25 10:49:18+00:00): Ainoa ongelma sen kanssa oikeastaan on se että tämä OSM:n peruskartta ei ole ottanut sitä vielä visualisointinsa piiriin koska näitä kohteita ilmeisesti vielä on sen verran vähän, mutta onko se nyt riittävä syy olla käyttämättä ko. tagia?
HSL_HRT (2022-03-25 10:50:39+00:00): Meillä HSL:ssä on itse asiassa paraikaa menossa prosessi jotta näin tägätyt tiet tulisivat näkyviin meidän karttatyylissä ja nyt ilmeisesti seudulta katosi ainoat demokappaleet tästä tagityksestä. :-?
rowcherryrow (2022-03-24 16:42:02+00:00): Correction: Comment should have been "Updated the classification of a couple of roads northeast of Abdullah Mubarak Al-Sabah #adt", source used was Esri World Imagery
5m4u9 (2022-03-24 22:56:19+00:00): Hola, que bueno que quieras usar el mapa, pero para esos datos es mejor que utilices https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/

Te permite dibujar sobre el mapa y poner o importar puntos y otra información, es más versátil.

Quitaré las areas que añadiste.
eggie (2022-03-24 06:44:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 



Feedback.. 
Soms zijn is dat straatmeubilair een gevolg van bulkimport uit een databestand. Imprort is aan regels gebonden. Het is geen garantie dat alles goed ligt of werkelijk aanwezig is. 
Lijkt me oke.. wellicht heb je hier nog iets aan.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_basket
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ptarac (2022-03-27 17:01:21+00:00): Miałem podpięty WMS z PRNG i nic mi nie pokazywał w tym miejscu. Z jakiego źródła dla PRNG korzystasz?
Bartek93ZGL (2022-03-31 07:56:13+00:00): WMS z PRNG ostatnio nie działa prawidłowo. Korzystam z podglądu warstwy PRNG na Geoportalu lub goleniow.e-mapa.net .
ptarac (2022-04-07 16:16:57+00:00): OK. Dzięki. Jak zmieniałem obrys jeziora to najwidoczniej nie działała.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118840904
ZLima12 (2022-03-23 23:29:00+00:00): Why did you delete the landuse for "Indian Trace Shopping Center"?
txemt (2022-03-23 23:35:30+00:00): Read previous comment on other changeset.
ZLima12 (2022-03-23 23:26:38+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/118841412
ZLima12 (2022-03-23 23:26:51+00:00): Oops, meant to ask why you were deleting so much landuse.
ZLima12 (2022-03-23 23:10:53+00:00): See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97404922
ZLima12 (2022-03-23 23:25:05+00:00): Why are you deleting so much landuse?
txemt (2022-03-23 23:28:20+00:00): I'm deleting those that are connected to the road segments. This user went through the area and connected landuse areas to roads, which has caused navigation issues. Yes, she connected a grass to an interstate and a bridge, which caused people to be told to "turn right" from an interstate onto an overpass. I have been in contact with this user via OSM mail about this. I'm only removing landuse features connected to road segments. It's easier to delete them and redraw them, than spend hours meticulously separating them from the road segments.
ZLima12 (2022-03-23 23:34:00+00:00): Although I dislike it, I don't think landuse being connected to roads should cause navigational issues. Are you sure the issue wasn't that she accidentally connected the two crossing roads as she drew the landuse?
ZLima12 (2022-03-23 23:35:07+00:00): May I ask which navigation program was being used, and which overpass the issues were happening at?
txemt (2022-03-23 23:38:08+00:00): Yes, she connected the two roads when she connected the landuse segment to that intersection. She may have done it unknowingly, but, she's connected a ton of landuse features to roads. She's making it harder to edit some of these roads.
txemt (2022-03-23 23:39:03+00:00): I've already fixed the interstate issue. I did that the day I found out about it.
txemt (2022-03-23 23:44:19+00:00): Most of these are grass and neighborhoods. They're easy to add back in. Same with the shopping center, although that whole SC wasn't correct. There are multiple SCs in that area.

I'm not going to go back in and add the grass.
ZLima12 (2022-03-24 00:02:58+00:00): Okay, I looked more closely over the things being deleted. I'm okay with many of the grass landuses being deleted and remapped. Each of them are not very significant, and many of them are very poorly mapped.

However, the shopping centers, schools, and residential areas I would say to fix by hand. These are more significant features that have history more worth preserving. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history .

Also, please use your changeset comments to communicate to other mappers why and what you're cleaning up.
ZLima12 (2022-03-24 00:04:56+00:00): For example, this way was not connected to any road, and looks fine to me, but it was deleted anyway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023058680
txemt (2022-03-24 00:05:38+00:00): I'm getting back to the hoods, SCs, and more important things. Give me a few days.
ZLima12 (2022-03-24 00:06:00+00:00): This one looked perfect, but it's gone now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017967759
JJIglesias (2022-03-24 03:50:22+00:00): Por convencion en Bolivia, ponemos el Termino Calle, Avenida, Pasaje, Pasillo segun corresponda al Nombre propio de la Calle. Alrededor de donde colocaste este nombre y la vivienda, hay una buena cantidad de calles SIN NOMBRE, seria IMPORTANTE que pusieras esos nombres en el mapa, segun la señalizacion disponible de cada calle.
Gracias
mariotomo (2022-03-24 17:52:21+00:00): hola. te comento pues tengo la impresión que no hiciste lo que querías. aquí mencionas borrar una relación, sin embargo sólo borraste el "admin_level" de una relación. además: antes de que le quitaras el "admin_level", las dos relaciones "Canto del Llano/canto del llano" se referían a dos entidades administrativas diferentes, una de nivel 8 (corregimiento) y la otra 10 ("barrio").
b-jazz (2022-04-04 02:54:07+00:00): Hello k,

What's up with the little stub of an area at the western edge of Hole 2 with the angle cut across the fairway? The whole area should be a single way and shouldn't be in two pieces and I'm trying to understand why it was created this way so I can help prevent it from happening in the future. Thanks.
Marek-M (2022-03-24 10:21:44+00:00): Dzięki za poprawkę literówek w opisach zmian :) Pozdrawiam!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118843248
JJIglesias (2022-03-24 03:40:51+00:00): Como se te indico en el Mensaje de Bienvenida: NO SE COLOCA el Nombre de la familia o personas que habitan un lugar. Es INFORMACION PRIVADA y NO VA EN EL MAPA. 
Slds
Retired Account (2022-03-24 10:36:28+00:00): This change violates the "Name is the name only" rule. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
renjieteo (2022-03-24 10:46:05+00:00): Hi, I am aware that the community prefers to retain the station building outline, hence it cannot be tagged as under construction since the building line will disappear. However, this resolves the issue of Not in Service or U/C stations appearing in the map and confusing users, which was according to numerous feedback under notes that has been closed.

The only alternative would be to alter the station name to display the status if the station building outline is to be retained...

Unless perhaps you can propose other alternatives such as tagging the entire station as construction (station outline and name will be hidden) or any other tags that will disable the station name, or provide alternative names for the map renderer without adding (U/C) or (Not in Service) to the name property
Retired Account (2022-03-24 10:36:26+00:00): This change violates the "Name is the name only" rule. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
renjieteo (2022-03-24 10:46:47+00:00): Hi, I am aware that the community prefers to retain the station building outline, hence it cannot be tagged as under construction since the building line will disappear. However, this resolves the issue of Not in Service or U/C stations appearing in the map and confusing users, which was according to numerous feedback under notes that has been closed.

The only alternative would be to alter the station name to display the status if the station building outline is to be retained...

Unless perhaps you can propose other alternatives such as tagging the entire station as construction (station outline and name will be hidden) or any other tags that will disable the station name, or provide alternative names for the map renderer without adding (U/C) or (Not in Service) to the name property
Retired Account (2022-03-24 10:36:24+00:00): This change violates the "Name is the name only" rule. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
renjieteo (2022-03-24 10:46:40+00:00): Hi, I am aware that the community prefers to retain the station building outline, hence it cannot be tagged as under construction since the building line will disappear. However, this resolves the issue of Not in Service or U/C stations appearing in the map and confusing users, which was according to numerous feedback under notes that has been closed.

The only alternative would be to alter the station name to display the status if the station building outline is to be retained...

Unless perhaps you can propose other alternatives such as tagging the entire station as construction (station outline and name will be hidden) or any other tags that will disable the station name, or provide alternative names for the map renderer without adding (U/C) or (Not in Service) to the name property
Retired Account (2022-03-24 10:34:43+00:00): This change violates the "Name is the name only" rule. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
renjieteo (2022-03-24 10:46:51+00:00): Hi, I am aware that the community prefers to retain the station building outline, hence it cannot be tagged as under construction since the building line will disappear. However, this resolves the issue of Not in Service or U/C stations appearing in the map and confusing users, which was according to numerous feedback under notes that has been closed.

The only alternative would be to alter the station name to display the status if the station building outline is to be retained...

Unless perhaps you can propose other alternatives such as tagging the entire station as construction (station outline and name will be hidden) or any other tags that will disable the station name, or provide alternative names for the map renderer without adding (U/C) or (Not in Service) to the name property
b-jazz (2022-03-26 16:21:10+00:00): Nice bounding box, dummy.
Gisolic (2022-03-24 09:04:21+00:00): Hello ڕاستی;
I noticed you added highway "tertiary" that is not exist in any satellite image, Could you provide us with the source you edited?
Examples for ways you added:-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043302426/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043302427/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043302428/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043302429/history
Regards
Gisolic
ڕاستی (2022-10-18 23:41:16+00:00): (First of all, my English is not very good.)
Sorry for responding lately.
Yes, it is under construction. It is a project of a Motorway around the Hawler city and a tertiary road each side of motorway.

Regards
ڕاستی (2022-10-18 23:45:28+00:00): https://gov.krd/momt-en/activities/news-and-press-releases/2021/january/statement-on-the-150-meter-road-project/
Gisolic (2022-10-19 07:35:57+00:00): Hello ڕاستی;
Thank you for the resource you provided.
Regards
Gisolic
user_5359 (2022-03-24 06:16:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
nevw (2022-03-24 05:40:47+00:00): Hi
if this is the local members office or similar, the name is misspelt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9345244597

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_of_Victoria
nevw (2022-03-26 12:35:36+00:00): No response, assumed typo and corrected.
HubMiner (2022-03-24 03:53:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/199332
mavl (2022-05-20 15:52:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-24 04:21:04+00:00): Please respect One Feature One Object https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4380973779
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Warin61 (2022-03-24 22:09:15+00:00): Hi,

Problem with the tree area.. 
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.18677&lat=-31.27949&zoom=13

Thanks for mapping these tree areas!
Kovoschiz (2022-03-24 04:58:01+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-24 04:57:13+00:00): N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 04:45:40+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution! Try not to touch boundaries like the one here if you're not working on it. I know it can be annoying sometimes, but please try to work around it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118846266
lavanhya (2022-10-28 11:47:18+00:00): Hi,

I apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset. Apologies for incorrectly connecting the road segment to administrative boundary. I'll ensure to not repeat such errors going ahead.

Thanks once again I really appreciate the feedback provided, looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
lavanhya
Dodko (2022-04-17 17:40:51+00:00): Do značky addr:street sa píše len názov ulice a Župčany nemajú ulice.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/934796392/history
wireguy (2022-03-24 13:21:38+00:00): michael, your 10 edits in the Washington Ave/Centennial Ave area have no comment and duplicate existing features or add things with no tags.   Please clean them up/revert.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118846602
AkuAnakTimur (2022-03-27 13:53:11+00:00): Been there seen that though... 

Jalan Kolam Air, driving northbounds https://kartaview.org/details/2705562/82/track-info

Jalan Kolam Air, driving southbounds
https://kartaview.org/details/2705562/400/track-info

(NB we don't actually take in copyrighted stuff unless permission is granted. I know, I know OpenStreetMap's coverage in Malaysia is abysmal, that's coming from an almost a decade old mapper, but OpenStreetMap is stricter in terms of copyright, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welcome_to_Wikipedia_users#We_are_much_stricter_about_copyright)
user_5359 (2022-03-27 07:10:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043331981. What is the meaning of the tag fix_osm_road = 20220324_poc? Did you know the key fixme?
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 11:39:34+00:00): Защо си изчертал пътя като две линии? Там няма мантинели между лентите.
dpolovinkin (2024-04-11 04:00:24+00:00): yeah I see you made those incorrect names in probably all your changesets... bad...
ivanatora (2022-03-24 07:27:25+00:00): Защо премахваш уточняващите кадастриални тагове от сградите? Те указват източника на информацията.