piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2016-10-31 08:15:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
maraf24 (2016-11-03 13:31:38+00:00): Numer 91 jest nie w tym budynku, tu jest 93.
Gdzie jest więc ta apteka?
maraf24 (2016-11-03 13:33:42+00:00): Sprawdziłem, aptek jest zarejestrowana pod adresem 91. 
Może trzeba ją przenieść na inny budynek?
A_Ku (2016-11-04 07:34:40+00:00): Dzień dobry, dziękuję za informację. Będę w tej okolicy w weekend i sprawdzę.
mweper (2016-10-31 12:55:48+00:00): Hola willyray.
No entiendo lo que quisiste poner con la adición de un puesto/estación policial en medio del cruce de las 2 autopistas.
--
¿Es un control policial (en ese caso, se etiqueta de otra forma) o en serio es un puesto policial semi/permanente (estación, container, cabina, etc.)?
--
Otra cosa, al nodo lo corrí para el lado de la banquina porque no creo que esté en medio del cantero ese puesto.
--
Cualquier duda, me puedes consultar. Saludos.
SomeoneElse (2016-10-31 10:29:15+00:00): Hello jmania,
In OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435269759/history as originally mapped by you was originally called "Şehit Mustafa Ruso Caddesi".  Is that the name still (as displayed on the street signs)?  If so, it makes sense for it to be still called that in OSM.
If you've got any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group
jmania (2016-10-31 10:37:29+00:00): Yes it's right. A user called spyro00 makes inappropriate and spam edits. Please stop that user if you are admin. That road's name is "Şehit Mustafa Ruso Caddesi"
SomeoneElse (2016-10-31 10:51:22+00:00): I've now reverted all the changes that hadn't already been reverted, and that has restored the old name.  Please correct if it's wrong.
Best Regards,
Andy
jmania (2016-10-31 11:23:27+00:00): Thanks a lot. They are know correct.
user_5359 (2016-10-31 10:21:51+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
literan (2016-10-31 12:14:30+00:00): Не надо спамить. Что еще за "парк" размером с автомобиль, со спамовой ссылкой? Откатываю
user_5359 (2016-10-31 10:21:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
Kris Anselmo (2017-12-03 16:56:26+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci de ne pas supprimer le tag elevation pour le concaténer au nom du sommet.
Pour plus d'informations reportez vous au wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dpeak
user_5359 (2016-10-31 10:15:59+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-16 19:48:18+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
Hjart (2016-10-31 09:38:04+00:00): Hej. Jeg har svaret på din fejlmelding: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/767126. Hvis du havde været logget ind da du skrev den havde du automatisk fået besked.
Hjart (2016-10-31 10:26:53+00:00): Jeg har svaret igen. Log venligst ind på OSM, hvis du skriver igen.
eggie (2018-12-28 08:07:01+00:00): Dag Basj.. nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
jaap de vries (2016-11-09 10:00:03+00:00): ik zie dat je een shelter / schuilhut hebt aangemaakt in een bestaand gebouw. Klopt dit? Of bedoel je dat je zelf hier woont?
user_5359 (2016-11-01 06:24:58+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-01 06:23:58+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-04 13:03:41+00:00): Can you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1257694 ?
kreuzschnabel (2017-07-10 17:15:41+00:00): Relation 6681368 sollte das Linksabbiegen zurück in den Kreisel verbieten, hatte aber die nach Westen führende Bahnallee als to-Member. Dadurch war de facto die Ausfahrt aus dem Kreisel in OSM verboten. Ist hier jetzt gefixt, aber bitte bei TR höllisch aufpassen, sonst wird OSM für Navis irnkwann unbrauchbar :(
Pajopath (2017-07-10 18:34:43+00:00): hi, ähm wie wann wo hab ich denn die Relation rausgelöscht? :-) Habe seit Monaten eigentlich schon nichts mehr editiert? Und was genau meinst du bitte mit "TR"?
kreuzschnabel (2017-07-10 21:26:18+00:00): Wenn das alles für dich böhmische Dörfer sind – nicht schlimm, aber dann leg bitte vorerst keine Abbiegebeschränkungen mehr an :-)

TR = turn restriction = Abbiegebeschränkung/-vorschrift

Du hast vor 8 Monaten die Relation angelegt (nicht gelöscht): http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6681368/history

Gemeint war wahrscheinlich ein Wendeverbot zurück in den Kreisel.

Du hast aber nicht die beiden kurzen Stücke zum Kreisel als Elemente der Beschränkung definiert, sondern das Ausfahrstück aus dem Kreisel und das anschließende Stück nach Westen. Das fassen alle Router so auf, dass sie da nicht durchfahren dürfen. Das hab ich jetzt repariert, indem ich deine Nicht-Relation in eine Nur-Relation umgewandelt habe. 

Bitte nicht als Vorwurf verstehen, sondern als Hinweis.
Pajopath (2017-07-11 05:03:15+00:00): Hi ganz bestimmt sehe ich das nicht als Vorwurf.

Nur nach 8 Monaten vergisst man dann doch einiges und dann so ein kurzer Brocken war dann doch zu wenig um daraus schlau zu werden. ;-)

Gibt es dazu mittlerweile eine gute Doku wie man sowas richtig macht? So ganz werde ich da noch nicht schlau raus warum für das Navi eine nicht links abbiegen Anweisung da falsch war da man doch eigentlich von der behilfsspur nur "rechts" abbiegen kann.
kreuzschnabel (2017-07-11 07:51:55+00:00): Im Wiki ist es eigentlich gut beschrieben :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Der Typ „nicht links“ war schon passend gewählt, nur hättest du in der „to“-Rolle dann den Wegabschnitt setzen müssen, auf den man _nicht_ abbiegen darf (also das Stück Bahnallee zurück in den Kreisel). Du hast aber das nach Westen führende Stück Bahnallee da reingesetzt. 
Dazu etwas Hintergrund: Technisch gibt es nur zwei Arten von Beschränkungen, nämlich „only“ und „no“. Mehr wertet der Router nicht aus. Ihn interessiert nur, ob das Fahren von "from" über "via" nach "to" a) vorgeschrieben („only“) oder b) verboten („no“) ist. Das „right turn“ etc. dahinter ist nur für uns Menschen gedacht, zum leichteren Verständnis. Dem Router ist es vollkommen egal, was hinter dem „no“ bzw. „only“ steht. Er hat nur das „no“ gesehen, den Bypass als „from“ und die Bahnallee als „to“ und schließt daraus, dass er vom Bypass nur zurück in den Kreisel fahren darf und nicht nach Westen.
Ich habe jetzt die Ways so in der Relation gelassen, wie du sie reingetan hast, aber den Typ in eine „only“-Restriction geändert. Das heißt jetzt: Wenn man den Bypass nimmt, kann man von seinem Ende aus nur die Bahnallee nach Westen nehmen, nicht nach Osten in den Kreisel zurück. Ich nehme an, das war gemeint. 
Generell ist iD (der Browser-Editor) leider nicht die beste Software zum Relationen-Anlegen, sie verrät zu wenig darüber, was genau angelegt wurde. JOSM ist auch hier unübertrefflich, Potlatch macht es glaub ich auch besser.
Allroads (2016-10-31 22:30:31+00:00): Why????, you took of natural=water on a polygon, waterway is for a line feature.
But you import polygons.
natural=water water=ditch
This was told several time in the forum!!
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=614227#p614227
TheSwavu (2016-12-10 02:27:37+00:00): Turn out that the original import of the NP boundary left out the southern block. I've done a refresh from the LPI data.
geozeisig (2016-10-31 15:01:58+00:00): Haus Nr. 3 ist jetzt korrekt. Nr 4,5,6 müssen auch noch korrigiert werden.
Bei den Kartenfehler sollten vorzugsweise Hinweise gegeben werden. Fragen gibt es viele. Das bringt uns aber nicht weiter. 
Gruß
user_5359 (2016-11-01 05:55:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Allroads (2016-11-02 15:05:27+00:00): First there was also natural=water on it, skipped it, so now there is only waterway=ditch on it, on a polygon,  a waterway gives a stream line, this can not on a polygon. Earlier part of a import, but this done during after a keepright session.
angys (2019-05-25 13:57:13+00:00): Can you retrace this place https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1790790 based on Esri, thank you.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 05:53:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
scruss (2017-07-27 13:20:59+00:00): Please check your validation tools - former node 4472746301 isn't a level crossing but an elevated pedestrian/bike bridge
hoream_telenav (2017-07-28 07:27:34+00:00): ok, thank you for letting me know
user_5359 (2016-11-01 05:49:25+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-12 19:30:16+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
geri-oc (2016-11-25 09:19:39+00:00): Du hast hier ein Cafe eingetragen. Ist das richtig? Oder war es nur vorübergehend?
geri-oc (2016-11-25 09:32:34+00:00): Korrektur:
Laut Forstbotanischer Garten ist es ein Shop mit Informationsmaterial , Bücher, Geschenke, Eis und Getränke.
Habe es jetzt so geändert.
HolgerBu (2016-11-25 09:40:49+00:00): Ist jetzt richtig hat nur geöffnet wenn der forstbotanische Garten offen hat. Danke
user_5359 (2016-11-01 05:48:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
rab (2017-04-14 17:14:29+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450339275
This river needs to be fixed
user_5359 (2016-11-01 05:40:11+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
to4ka2 (2017-02-27 08:21:39+00:00): А откуда инфа по расположению и виду домов?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4104785889
literan (2017-02-27 10:13:08+00:00): по виду (по левой группе) - спросите у тех, кто их рисовал. Остальное - примерно, по фото с коптера в каком-то ЖЖ
nevw (2016-11-02 00:09:14+00:00): The change you have made using satellite info is incorrect. That part of Hercules Road ends in a short stub as previously mapped and has a lift gate to. Bear in mind that programs like #to-fix are only suggesting an error MAY be present, not that there is an error to correct. Mapbox and Bing are outdated by numerous new developments.
I will restore the correct state by gps and survey shortly.
ridixcr (2016-11-02 15:36:54+00:00): Hi newv, 
Thank you for notifying me about this error and also rectifying it. The imageries are outdated in certain places, agreed. I will make sure to confirm or at least add a note in places of doubt.

Thanks for your feedback.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 06:11:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please help me to verify the streets of your city.
p_kiranmai (2019-07-23 09:04:07+00:00): "Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the

"way 450344373
way 450344372"

classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
AkuAnakTimur (2019-08-09 07:07:50+00:00): As the one who mapped these highways from collecting my own GPS tracks: best if they are left as they were
user_5359 (2016-10-31 17:42:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-31 17:36:28+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-31 17:35:46+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mueschel (2016-11-03 11:43:05+00:00): Hi,
on 50 of your ways I found the tag 'sarface', which is misspelled and should be 'surface'. Could you have a look and correct this mistake?

Cheers, Jan
marianasusgime (2016-10-31 12:41:47+00:00): salta capital
Basstoelpel (2017-02-24 19:41:37+00:00): Hallo cepesko,

Du solltest vielleicht auf einen aktuelleren editor wechseln, der nicht dazu verleitet, an jeder Solaranlage das seit über einem halben Jahrzehnt veraltete power_source=photovoltaic zu ergänzen.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
maraf24 (2016-11-01 10:18:17+00:00): Podaj źródło dla tej zmiany, tj. nr uchwały rady miejskiej. Może być też link.
user_5359 (2016-10-31 17:30:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-31 17:30:15+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-31 17:29:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
naoliv (2016-12-12 19:49:35+00:00): Gabriel, você copiou do Google esses nomes de ruas?
santamariense (2016-12-12 22:52:57+00:00): E o pior é que eu me prestei para procurar pela cidade de "Chácara São Judas Tadeu". 
Esse nome aparece no mapa do Google, que inclusive parece ser um spam por lá. Nada mais do que uma imobiliária anunciando um imóvel, e para isso adicionou por lá este objeto como se fosse um hotel.
Os novos mapeadores ficam bem esclarecidos sobre o copyright de outros mapas quando começam a editar no OSM?
naoliv (2016-12-12 22:56:56+00:00): Então, deveriam ler as coisas.
Inclusive colocamos um aviso na hora de salvar as modificações no iD: https://i.imgur.com/PzNKtpk.png  

Já tem um bom tempo que essa mensagem é exibida. Sinceramente não sei o mais dá para fazer.
santamariense (2016-12-13 13:28:41+00:00): Talvez o acréscimo de algo como "Nem gaste seu tempo copiando que sua edição será apagada" amenize. Não exatamente com essas palavras.
A gente teria que se organizar para saber se há patrulha de edições cobrindo todo o país. Preferencialmente averiguando diariamente para desfazer o quanto antes.
E para acabar de %$!£%, esse ID cada vez que se salva a edição ele cria um novo changeset. Com isso o nosso colega Gabriel tem feito ~66 edições por dia. E agora averiguar as 10 mil edições dele?
Por fim quem sai perdendo é a comunidade OSM, porque contribuidores ignoram o aviso de copyright e gastam toda sua energia construindo um castelo de areia quando seria preferível um barraco, mas de concreto.
Vilela68 (2016-12-14 17:52:09+00:00): Boa tarde a todos.
Gostaria de informar que por algum motivo essa Chácara de São Judas tadeu foi adicionado ao meu ID. Tenho a certeza que não fiz esse Mapeamento, já informei isso ao amigo MárcioThundecell e Santamariense. Tenho o hábito de criar vias e criar pontos que conheço, mas  atrapalhar o trabalho da OSM não é legal e sei disso. Peço desculpas por falta de até não conhecer o sistema e de não ter respondido também aos colaboradores.
Gabriel
naoliv (2016-12-14 17:54:24+00:00): Sem problema.
Estamos vendo uma forma para corrigir essas informações.
muralito (2016-10-31 13:01:16+00:00): Mariana: No conviene poner datos personales com el domicilio, telefono, etc en una base de datos abierta.
muralito (2016-10-31 13:03:28+00:00): Pusiste la direccion como Santo Tomas, y la calle se llama San Pantaleon.

¿Esta mal el nombre de esas dos calles?
kaltuna (2020-09-24 04:45:04+00:00): Hallo, kannst Du Dir bitte mal den Hinweismarker anschauen ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2276765
Der Referenziert auf diesen Änderungssatz
highflyer74 (2016-10-31 15:02:28+00:00): Hallo!

Ich habe einen Änderungssatz von Dir kommentiert. Leider bekam ich keine Antwort und habe daraufhin vor einigen Tagen eine PN mit der Bitte um Rückmeldung geschrieben. Leider bekam ich auch darauf keine Antwort.

In der Zwischenzeit hast Du weitergemappt (was durchaus löblich ist), aber das gleiche fehlerhafte Tagging verwendet, was für andere Mapper Mehrarbeit bedeutet und auch dazu führt, daß die betreffenden Daten für niemanden nutzbar sind.

Ich möchte Dich darauf hinweisen, daß OSM ein kollaboratives Projekt ist, daß nur durch Kommunikation zwischen den Teilnehmern funktioniert. Deshalb wird erwartet, daß man auf Nachrichten, die einen erreichen auch antwortet...
ulrich_ (2020-09-23 21:05:03+00:00): What does "AA guns" here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4472711501) mean?
user_5359 (2016-10-31 17:22:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
GeoBusiness (2016-10-31 17:35:49+00:00): Hi, 
I am working for the business located here. I have permission from the owners to add or update online information about their business and business location. The information I added comes from the owners of the property. Does that clear things up?
user_5359 (2016-11-01 09:34:56+00:00): I can't see any building on the aerial image. There is an driveway to a building with a black roof and a grey residential building.

And please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours .
b108 (2016-11-01 19:02:08+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Вы активно ставите на объектах тег

operator=RU-VGG-1

а это неправильно.

Дело в том, что этим тегом в OSM обозначаются непосредственные владельцы или управляющая организация. Скажем, "оператором" детского сада является вовсе не пожарная часть, а городской отдел образования, а "оператором" заправочной станции - фирма, которой она принадлежит.

Используйте, пожалуйста, тег fire_operator=RU-VGG-1

Тогда никаких проблем не будет.

Кстати, в инструкции по добавлению ранга пожара с сайта karta01.ru (не знаю, связаны вы с этим сайтом или нет) http://karta01.ru/main_content/info/instruction/objects/ также сказано про тег fire_operator.

Я могу массово по всему Волгограду превратить

operator=RU-VGG-1 в fire_operator=RU-VGG-1

От вас требуется только согласие.

Если вы продолжите использовать тег operator не по назначению, то в будущем у вас будут многочисленные конфликты с другими участниками, лучше начать использовать правильные теги уже сейчас.

Спасибо.
Alan Trick (2016-11-14 18:38:33+00:00): I'd just like to point out that you added a whole pile of building & address tags to the nodes, roads, and waterways in this area. Be careful when editing large numbers of elements all at once it with JSOM :)
Caitlin Yu (2016-11-15 09:57:50+00:00): Sir, how do you easily tag the buildings while excluding the nodes of the roads and waterways?
Alan Trick (2016-11-15 20:53:59+00:00): The safest way to do it is to probably just tag the objects as you make them, using the "Building Presets" preset would make this a little easier.

If that's too much work, doing a search (in the Edit menu) for "type:way -*=*" would probably work okay.
coloredstone (2016-11-10 07:16:57+00:00): Tale cesta še ni odprta in sem jo vrnil v highway=construction in construction=highway.
eggie (2019-12-28 20:08:11+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze alsnog  Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Allroads (2016-10-31 23:02:24+00:00): Import: Do you ever use JOSM validation, today uploads, all crossing ways and overlapping ways and more on your own uploaded data.