piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
czubi (2020-11-22 15:03:23+00:00): zurückgeändert und ergänzt
Balewupp (2020-11-22 15:07:19+00:00): So ist‘s für mich ok.
czubi (2020-11-22 15:21:52+00:00): prima
Korgi1 (2020-12-02 00:01:44+00:00): is the name "Dick Ford Road" correct?
Alan Bragg (2020-12-05 16:19:37+00:00): Yes. It's in the state enhanced 911 emergency database. That's where you'd go to rescue someone. Driveways are often named after their owners in Maine
Korgi1 (2020-12-06 03:38:37+00:00): Alright no problem. It just showed up as "suspicious" due to profanity in the name.
czubi (2020-11-22 14:39:36+00:00): Was ist das? ein Kleindenkmal?
operator gelöscht
Balewupp (2020-11-22 14:46:56+00:00): Ja, so ein Abdruck im Granitfels, ich kann gerne ein Bild schicken.
Meine Antwort-e-Mails werden von OSM leider nicht empfangen.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-11-20 11:30:29+00:00): Ciao. Se un sentiero non esiste più e non è ipotizzabile un ripristino, deve essere rimosso. Se invece è ipotizzabile un suo ripristino, allora bisogna cambiare il tag da highway=path a destroyed:highway=path, evitando di inserire le varie restrizioni di accesso. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94457192
SilvyTo (2020-11-20 16:32:07+00:00): La realtà è che la zona dove si dovrebbe sviluppare il sentiero è diventata proprietà dell'acquedotto comunale, che ha posto un cancello, chiuso a chiave, all'estremità ovest. Ho inserito un cancello che delimita la proprietà privata dell'Acquedotto di Chiaverano.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94457192
Andrea Musuruane (2020-11-20 16:43:50+00:00): Ma da est si può arrivare? O ci sono anche lì delle restrizioni? E da dove? Comunque il questo caso il tagging corretto è semplicemente di indicare il percorso tra questi due estremi con un tag access=private (togliendo quindi foot=no, horse=no e bicycle=no). Ciao, Andrea
SilvyTo (2020-11-20 17:07:27+00:00): Da est c'è un guado, come correttamente segnalato. Il sentiero, però è praticamente impraticabile, tra rovi e sottobosco non curato, oltre a un terreno franoso. E' in un conoide di frana. Ho modificato come da te suggerito. Grazie mille!
highflyer74 (2020-12-04 17:26:01+00:00): Hier wurde eine Fussgängerzone gelöscht. Gibt es dafür einen Grund?
highflyer74 (2020-12-04 17:33:39+00:00): CS reverted due to unexplained deletions.
DressyPear4 (2020-11-20 21:00:36+00:00): O que significa essa edição? Não há nenhuma via ai
Andrea Musuruane (2020-11-20 11:24:33+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Non è necessario aggiungere foot=yes ad una strada ad uso agricolo o forestale (highway=track). E' già l'impostazione predefinita. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94457599
SilvyTo (2020-11-20 16:20:08+00:00): OK, avevo inserito foot=yes perché il programma di navigazione Komoot (che si basa su OpenStreetMap) non me lo includeva nel percorso. Ora funziona, ma non so cosa sia stato cambiato! Grazie per un feedback, se possibile, così imparo...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94457599
Andrea Musuruane (2020-11-20 16:27:40+00:00): Ciao. Una delle regole di OpenStreetMap va sotto il nome di "Don't tag for the renderer". Significa che non si inseriscono i dati per ottenere un determinato comportamento (ad esempio una specifica visualizzazione). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer 
Non ho mai usato komoot, ma se non fa percorrere a piedi le highway=track, direi che il problema è nel software e non nei dati di OSM. Ciao, Andrea
!bm (2021-01-19 21:38:32+00:00): Hallo TheBlackMan,

du hast hier an Straßen-ways nicht nur fleißig wikipedia, wikidata und wikicommons getaggt, sondern auch noch image=* an sämtliche Teilstücke – das finde ich dann doch zuviel des Guten. 

Abgesehen davon, dass der Nutzen eines Bildes zur Beschreibung einer Straße im Normalfall eher überschaubar ist, ist es in den allermeisten Fällen schlichtweg eine unbrauchbare oder falsche Zuordnung von (Des-)Information.

Beispielsweise hast du für die Straße des 17. Juni ein Bild deren Abschnitts zwischen Siegessäule und Brandenburger gewählt – aber auch alle ways westlich der Siegessäule damit getaggt. 

--besteGrüße!bm
PantherStrix (2021-01-20 06:17:42+00:00): Hallo !bm,
ich gebe dir recht und habe die image-tags mit Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97811271 wieder entfernt.

Gruß TheBlackMan
cMartin (2021-02-20 00:10:55+00:00): Hallo czubi,

warum hast du die Relation aufgelöst? Dadurch sind zwei Universitäten in Ilmenau entstanden. Gleichzeitig sind die Namen der jeweiligen Campus entfallen...

Würde den Change wieder rückgängig machen.
czubi (2021-02-20 12:01:30+00:00): Mach mal bitte rückgängig ich schau nachher mal was die Beweggründe waren. Oder obs ein Irrtum war. Danke
czubi (2021-02-20 12:11:20+00:00): Der fehler ist entstanden weil es ein MP mit nur outern ist. Sowas gibts normalerweise nicht bzw. es ist unnötig. Der Relationstyp ist hier falsch. Es müsste site sein, nicht multipolygon. Trotzdem mein Fehler. Muss ich besser hinschauen.
abakus_uploader (2020-11-19 23:32:24+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-07-01 10:51:51+00:00): Hi, where did you get Rulli-Jänese name? In any case, caps shouldn't be used.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561821312
mueschel (2020-11-21 12:55:15+00:00): Hi,
you added many payment tags here, but none of them is used in any other places. Please check the wiki for the correct keys:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment

Thanks!
gileri (2020-11-21 13:11:16+00:00): Hi,

I did not really add those values, I split the adress node and the shop. You can see the original object history there :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2810797671/history

However you're right that the user "Moulin Roty Lyon" shouldn't have used those tags, so I fixed them amongst other :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94543964

Éric
joost schouppe (2020-11-20 08:15:32+00:00): Hoi Frans,
Ik heb wat aanpassingen gedaan:
* was:disused=* --- ik denk dat dit het resultaat was van wederzijds misverstand tussen jou en Marc_marc
* ik heb twee tags op was:[originele tag] gezet. Op die manier "plakt" het nog aan het object, maar is duidelijk dat het niet meer van toepassing is. De criteria lijken mij niet meer van toepassing, en worden dus was:OnroerendErfgoed:criteria=BE . Ik heb de redenering van OnroerendErfgoed doorgetrokken en zeg "dit was ooit historisch waardevol, maar nu niet meer" met was:historic=yes. Dit zou je evengoed kunnen deleten
* De ref, operator en website van heritage heb ik gewoon laten staan, omdat dit pand wel nog altijd in het inventaris zit
Dit is allemaal voor discussie vatbaar, maar mij lijkt dit wel correct.
joost schouppe (2020-11-20 08:38:43+00:00): Ik heb een aantal dingen op was:[oorspronkelijke tag] gezet, omdat deze niet meer van toepassing zijn. Een aantal andere (bijvoorbeeld de website van onroerenderfgoed kent dit object nog) bestaan wel nog, dus die heb ik zo gelaten.
joost schouppe (2020-11-20 08:39:09+00:00): Ha, die tweede comment was overbodig, ik dacht dat de eerste verloren was gegaan :)
darkonus (2020-11-21 12:23:14+00:00): Прошу скасувати набір змін. Куток це загальна назва, так як "вулиця" чи "площа" і тому має бути з маленької літери. Зі словника: ...частина якої-небудь території, місцевості, країни і т. ін. В світі божому нема кутка без горя Не тільки тут, а і по той бік моря (Леонід Глібов, Вибр., 1951, 77); Звенигородщина — співучий куток України, в ньому Кирилівка не останнє в цьому село (Степан Васильченко, II, 1959, 359); Стоячи на березі Тихого океану і дивлячись на захід, я згадував Україну, і вона постала перед моїми очима у своєму справжньому розмірі, десь там далеко на заході в лівому кутку, і це помножило мою гордість громадянина великої Радянської країни (Олександр Довженко, I, 1958, 26);
//  Певна частина (кінець) села. [Василь:] Чого на наш куток по воду прийшла? (Марко Кропивницький, II, 1958, 117); Ні, не можу далі за лихими сусідами вдержатись на кутку. Хоч зараз спродуйся, пакуйся та й на кубанські степи (Володимир Самійленко, II, 1958, 354); Тиша. Лиш на кутку і дзвязк і стук. Проїде вулицею хтось (Павло Тичина, I, 1957, 83);
eggie (2020-11-19 20:35:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
axelr (2020-11-20 08:06:59+00:00): Der name-Tag sah vorher besser aus.
Was hälst du von Bus 367: Herne => Hiltrop
Gruß, Axel
man-sl200 (2020-11-22 10:57:39+00:00): Hallo, die Frage ist hier nicht, was besser aussieht. Vielmehr ist hier die Frage, warum jemand entgegen aller anderen Linien der HCR das von mir schon seit Jahren vorhandene Schema nach seinem Dünken geändert hat. Die Frage ist auch, warum irgendwelche Leute permanent ÖPNV-Tags (und nur diese bearbeite ich - und auch für meinen Heimatbetrieb) im Besserwissertum zerstören (unter anderem bus-stops) und eigene unnütze Kreationen schaffen. Ich hätte noch viel mehr, aber dafür bist Du der falsche Empfänger. Gruß Dirk
eggie (2020-11-19 21:09:57+00:00): Even gekeken.. Eigenlijk is het hier fundamenteel allemaal niet goed. :)
Dat zijn edits van de voorgaande mapper ; de spoorwegspecialist.
Zo hoort het water niet op de landuse te liggen en die scrub ook niet.
Met een simpele editor als iD is dit nauwelijks te doen.
Je zou eens moeten kijken naar edit josm.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       
Zal even kijken of het simpel is op te lossen.
gr eggie
eggie (2020-11-19 21:15:20+00:00): Het water heb ik uitgesneden.
De scrub ligt in een multypolygoon
jwieman (2020-11-24 18:59:55+00:00): Dag Eggie.... om nog even te reageren: bedankt! ik vond het fijn om te zien dat wat ik er raar uit vond niet, ook zo gevonden werd door jou! Inmiddels maar overgestapt naar josm. Groet!
mariotomo (2020-11-24 21:04:16+00:00): nadie te está apoyando en el aprendizaje? mapeaste como edificio un campo de futbal. si necesitas ayuda por favor entra en el grupo Telegram https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
mariotomo (2020-11-21 01:27:17+00:00): hola.  cuidado con ediciones como esta, un edificio gigante triangular de nombre "saracatunga" se clasifica de vandalismo.
user_8466505 (2020-11-20 22:04:32+00:00): Hello Rail50,

I noticed you made your first contribution to OpenStreetMap. Congratulations! As of now, you can consider yourself part of the US OSM community. Your edit is live within a couple of minutes. You may have to refresh your browser to see your edit.

If you have any questions at all, we can help out. If you think you might have broken something, you’re in doubt how to map something particular, or you just want to know more about OpenStreetMap, contact us!

Here are some useful things to get you started:

* I highly recommend using the OSM [wiki-pages](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/). If you don’t find how to map something within the editor of your choice, the quickest solution is look at [Map Features](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features) on the wiki. For more complicated questions you can search in or post on the [Help-site](http://help.openstreetmap.org) or ask [the forum](http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=20). Probably the best place to ask on on OpenStreetMap US Chapter's [Slack](https://slack.openstreetmap.us/). Slack is a collaboration tool for OSM mappers, organizers, and developers. Slack even has our own #local-washington-State channel.

* [learnOSM](http://learnosm.org) is a good place to learn more about OSM. Instructions are available for using the iD browser editor and the more advanced JOSM editor.
* Want to see who’s mapping near you, or want to see how much you’ve been doing yourself, check out the maps at [resultmaps.neis-one.org](http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/).
* If you are a business owner and want to learn how to add OpenStreetMap to your website, check out the site [Switch2OSM](https://switch2osm.org/)

So what should you map next? I highly recommend adding features around you. Restaurants, business, streets, sidewalks, benches, basically features that you know best. You are the expert. If you find a business already mapped, make sure there is an address. There is something satisfying about filling in the map around you. Or correcting a road when the local government makes changes to it. Do you have any special interests, like biking, hiking, or even trains? Did you know we have the best bike, hiking and train world wide networks of any site. But like everything else, they can always use improvements.

Happy Mapping!
TheAdventurer64
mariotomo (2020-11-24 21:09:20+00:00): hola, necesitas ayuda para mejorar tu estilo de mapeo?  un campo de futbal que un compañero mapeó como edificio, le añadiste nombre, pero no mejoraste el error.  nadie te está dando indicaciones?  no perteneces a un grupo?  si quieres, tenemos uno en Telegram: https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
King_Of_The_Road_BG (2021-08-07 16:56:53+00:00): Dear @saintam1, may you help me understand why you are changing here (and in several other places) the speed limit from 50 to 30 km/h?
saintam1 (2021-08-07 19:56:46+00:00): Hello, it's what the traffic signs on the street say.
King_Of_The_Road_BG (2021-08-09 14:41:33+00:00): Dear @saintam1 no chance for that on this boulevard and on any other street in Sofia - please revise your way of mapping, at least here in Sofia. You can have a speed limit of 30 km/h only on speed bumps - and it is valid only for the bump, not for the whole street. Please check again and stop mapping in such a wrong way.
saintam1 (2021-08-09 15:06:18+00:00): I see. Thanks for clarifying.
King_Of_The_Road_BG (2021-08-12 11:30:38+00:00): Are you able to revert all changes of this kind from your side, at least here in Sofia? Or at least to give me a list, so that I can fix these misleading settings!?
saintam1 (2021-08-12 13:33:44+00:00): Happy to help, sure. We could start with this, a map of all the roads that have maxspeed=30: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1afE

I imagine some of these are legitimate. The ones in Lyulin are probably all from me, I can remove those. Some random clicking suggests most of the other results are from the Kaart team who did a lot of mapping ~2 years ago. They're not local, probably they were as confused as me.
saintam1 (2021-08-12 20:56:42+00:00): I made lists of all ways that currently have maxspeed=30, and where the maxspeed tag was set to 30 either by me, or one of the Kaart team. To undo that, I propose to:

1: remove the maxspeed tag on these: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1agn

2: reset the maxspeed to 50 on these: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1agp

3: reset the maxspeed to 40 on these: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1agr

I excluded from these lists ways of *_link type, my thinking is that the speed sign there is probably indicative of the speed on the entire way, e.g. the "30" sign visible on the off ramp here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=502283867564811 applies to all this:https://osm.org/way/15241998

Let me know what you think, and if you agree I'll make the changes.
King_Of_The_Road_BG (2021-08-18 10:46:06+00:00): I believe your approach is correct, with only one slight recommendation -  I would suggest that for all three groups you "reset these to having no maxspeed tag" - then the urban speed limit would be taken into consideration.

Either way, your input on these changes would be highly appreciated!
King_Of_The_Road_BG (2021-08-18 10:48:42+00:00): Maybe it would be beneficial to add this combination of road signs (with or without the pedestrian crossing sign): https://www.google.com/maps/@42.7182581,23.2463608,3a,75y,258.41h,81.74t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1scspGzlgWJyB1LWejUYYqMw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
to the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed
so we may avoid such confusion in the future!
saintam1 (2021-08-20 06:26:01+00:00): I think you're right, it makes sense to just remove the maxspeed and let it fall back to the default. I'll do that.
saintam1 (2021-08-20 06:31:47+00:00): Actually, reading the wiki, I think setting maxspeed=BG:urban would probably be best
saintam1 (2021-08-20 08:10:21+00:00): I've made the change: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109971837 

I also agree about updating the wiki, it would definitely help!
Jez Nicholson (2020-11-21 12:51:43+00:00): thanks...but, it was my fault that a relation got created because I was trying to do building-parts in iD and failed. I've since re-edited this to make it a house again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94461347
Jez Nicholson (2020-11-21 12:52:29+00:00): thanks...but, it was my fault that a relation got created because I was trying to do building-parts in iD and failed. I've since re-edited this to make it a house again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94461347
mariotomo (2020-11-20 02:38:19+00:00): hola.  gracias por mejorar el mapa de Santiago.  sólo: cuidado con los comentarios pues mencionas "San Miguelito" ??
Glassman (2020-11-19 23:54:41+00:00): Tip: We usually add a name tag to the bus stop. The name is found on the timetable at the stop.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94461481
mariotomo (2021-04-06 15:54:23+00:00): Hola LMily, son contribuciones relevantes estas que pusiste, no sigue tu interés en contribuir a OpenStreetMap?
mariotomo (2020-11-23 18:40:49+00:00): hola. disculpa, pero demasiado aproximadas estas contribuciones. ponte en contacto con los maperos activos en Santiago para coordinar esfuerzos. gracias por tu interés en OSM, y ojalá sigas mejorando tus prácticas.
mariotomo (2020-11-26 23:30:52+00:00): hola Andrés.  si mapeas por interés personal, y quieres mejorar, pues estás haciendo errores bien raros … tenemos un grupo:
https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
serás bienvenido, y ojalá sigas mapeando y mejorando.
DaveF (2020-11-20 00:03:42+00:00): Hi
Only one of these appears to be a public footpath. Just because you walked across a field, it doesn't make it a footpath.
Robach (2020-11-20 18:13:41+00:00): Why have the IDs been removed?
Strubbl (2020-11-20 08:10:00+00:00): Hallo NNemec, super, dass du die Hausnummer korrigiert hast. Magst du vielleicht noch bei deinen Nachbarhäusern gucken, ob die auch falsche Hausnummern haben? Die im Moment 89, 77 etc. scheinen nicht mehr so richtig ins Schema zu passen.
Gruß, Sven
gscholz (2020-11-24 05:40:42+00:00): Hi Alexandre
can you please check if "highway=pedestrian" is actually the right tag for those historc lines?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian

This changeset has created an error regarding self intersecing lines as well:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-75.13126&lat=-14.66583&zoom=12&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix tis?
Guido
seattlefyi (2020-11-19 23:40:45+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for editing, this project has been going on for a while! I went ahead and added some detail, changing the landuse into building=apartments. Thanks again!
ehaubert (2020-11-19 22:08:58+00:00): #MbxThx2020 #osmgeoweek
mariotomo (2020-11-23 17:50:38+00:00): Hola Jaqueline.  les pusieron una tarea demasiado complicada, mapeando como principiantes en zonas urbanas, y además los pusieron en zona donde ya hay un par de editores comprometidos con un resultado de buena calidad.  te invito, como al resto del capítulo YMUP, a entrar en el grupo Telegram que tanto Karen como Maritza ya conocen.
maruku67 (2021-01-05 10:01:53+00:00): Attention pas mal d'erreurs dans vos modifications : 40960188 chemin doublé
874905105 : chemin qui n'existe pas (les chemins du cadastre ne sont pas forcément existants).
Kamran_nef (2020-11-19 23:10:55+00:00): please undo the changes
Kamran_nef (2020-11-20 18:03:07+00:00): to anyone reviewing this pls revert the changeset
syntex (2020-11-20 21:15:44+00:00): Reverted with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94524241
Glassman (2020-11-20 03:18:58+00:00): I'd recommend moving the highway=stop to the line in the pavement and then add a new highway=crossing since the stop is usually just before the crossing. This is at the intersection of East Columbia Street and 16th Avenue
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94464294
markkerrigan (2020-11-20 20:40:28+00:00): OK I fixed it here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94523049
Glassman (2020-11-20 21:14:43+00:00): Perfect - thanks
felipeeugenio (2021-11-12 22:16:23+00:00): Dibujado de caminos inexistentes
Darkhex (2020-11-27 11:24:52+00:00): What is happening here?
This is all wrong, none of this should have been changed.
Why were the roads removed and roads and a waterway that don't exist added? This needs to be reverted.
Darkhex (2020-11-27 11:42:03+00:00): Aqueduct road is especially messed up, are you using very old outdated map data? Please revert this.
Warin61 (2020-11-22 10:43:41+00:00): Hi,
Relations 11911717 and 11911812 are broken.  See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.85632&lat=-35.50630&zoom=8&opacity=0.72 Good luck. 

Side note The imagery used cannot be the DCS NSW Imagery as that does not show boundaries...
user_5359 (2020-11-20 06:21:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question about your entry: You have entered a named object with a hashtag. Is this really the name of the object or "only" a label for your action?
eggie (2020-11-20 07:43:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
opendcc (2020-11-20 05:13:58+00:00): Hallo,

einer der Grundsätze von OSM: tagging what's on ground. Und wenn es den Club nicht gibt, dann gibt es ihn halt nicht. Auch nicht auf dem flachen Grund des Chiemsees. Du könntest ein lifecycle präfix verwenden.

Servus Wolfgang
Nakaner (2020-11-20 09:27:15+00:00): Hallo osmmichl,

ich habe den Node gelöscht. Der hat mitten im See nichts zu suchen.

OSM ist kein Branchenbuch oder Vereinsverzeichnis für Einrichtungen ohne dauerhafte, orstfeste Präsenz. Es ist genauso wenig eine Seite, wo man persönliche Marker auf der Karte platzieren kann. Wir sind ein seriöses Projekt zur Erfassung von Daten für eine Geodatenbank. Bitte verwende daher stattdessen https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=47.8724&mlon=12.4344#map=16/47.8724/12.4344, wenn du einen Marker brauchst, der nicht in der Datenbank eingetragen ist.

Viele Grüße

Michael
gscscnd (2020-11-21 09:11:14+00:00): Dzięki!
B_KSL (2020-11-21 18:59:04+00:00): To po koledze Jejko02 zostało, nie po Tobie ale przyjmuję podziękowania :)
gscscnd (2020-11-21 19:45:48+00:00): Wiem, ja nie daję rady analizować wszystkich jego (albo: jego edytora) zmian, więc dziękuję, że w tym pomagasz.
B_KSL (2020-11-21 20:08:05+00:00): No tak, dużo tego i regularnie.
Dzisiaj się wreszcie odezwał. Zobaczymy, może się coś poprawi.
gscscnd (2020-11-21 20:17:24+00:00): Tu się nie odezwał, może nie czyta poczty: <https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11626847>.