piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
alphensebezorger (2021-08-07 11:57:00+00:00): Is bicycle:forward=use_sidepath ook een mogelijke tagging voor deze situatie? Ik vind dat zelf beter te begrijpen dan "eenrichtingsverkeer voor fietsers", maar misschien denkt niet iedereen er zo over...
BikePC (2021-08-07 13:23:11+00:00): Die constructie ken ik niet. Voor mij is oneway met yes / no duidelijker, daarbij lettend op de tekenrichting van de weg. Het voorstel van multimodaal heb ik uitgevoerd. Zie changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109310449
multimodaal (2021-08-07 16:05:42+00:00): Hoi, ik deel hier de voorkeur van BikePC. 

Op zich klinkt  bicycle:forward=use_sidepath mij ook niet onjuist in de oren, maar het is een stuk gebruikelijk dan oneway:bicycle=yes (volgens taginfo wordt die twee meer dan 100x zo vaak gebruikt).  

oneway:bicycle=yes is volgens mij ook correct en de kans dat datagebruikers dat correct verwerken lijkt me veel groter dan bij de weinig gebruikte samentrekking van forward en use_sidepath  (helaas wordt zelfs de gewone bicycle=use_sidepath lang niet door alle datagebruikers goed ondersteund, ook niet door een betaald app als Komoot, zag dat ook mis gaan bij routers van navigatiefabrikant Bryton). Groet!
multimodaal (2021-08-07 16:06:48+00:00): edit.. "maar het is een stuk ongebruikelijker dan oneway:bicycle=yes (volgens taginfo wordt die tweede meer dan 100x zo vaak gebruikt). "
ScottNelson (2021-09-16 08:03:29+00:00): I hiked this trail last weekend and thought that sac_scale = mountain_hiking would be a better assessment of the trail difficulty.
user_5359 (2021-06-23 03:43:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
colgza (2021-06-23 00:24:43+00:00): Reverted 90383701 because their reasoning for converting this from a trunk is not true.
mariotomo (2021-10-04 00:42:24+00:00): hola. cambiaste un stop=minor en stop=nw,se. me gustaría entender el razonamiento, pues es el revés de una edición mia. es obvio que no quiero volver a cambiar algo que volverás a cambiar, quiero que nos entendamos.
mariotomo (2021-10-30 20:40:21+00:00): lo he editado en forma más explicita, así como estoy añadiendo los demás puntos de stop documentados con mapillary.
user_5359 (2021-06-23 03:40:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the address node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8792089219 over 100 meters, please check the position.
Mammi71 (2022-01-11 21:32:31+00:00): Hallo wermak, was ist denn der Anlass, ganz Fahrenkamp a) als recratio_ground und b) als access=private umzutaggen? Hat da ein Investor das ganze Dorf (Stadteil von Barth) gekauft?
pitscheplatsch (2021-06-24 06:16:26+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106875325
DressyPear4 (2021-06-25 20:03:14+00:00): Fiz uns ajustes
Alexey Vazhnov (2021-06-25 19:15:46+00:00): Здравствуйте!
А откуда такая информация, что это Олотау а не Улуташ?
Glassman (2021-06-24 02:22:06+00:00): #TIP: It looks like you accidentally dragged a node. I went ahead and fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106804387
Glassman (2021-06-24 02:27:03+00:00): #TIP: When removing a building or business, keep the address as a node. It's likely future buildings will use the same address.

According to King County, 3411 W Government Way is at the original location. Can you move it back?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106804485
Glassman (2021-06-24 02:29:28+00:00): #TIP: While landuse can be a node, it's usually an area. To fix, just draw an area around the new apartments and transfer the node info to it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106804722
riysingh (2021-06-23 02:44:43+00:00): Hi,
I have made the edits in this changeset : 106804823 based on #MapWithAI.

Regards,
riysingh.
Glassman (2021-06-24 02:31:37+00:00): These appear to be building and should have a building= tag. Instead of building=yes, you could make it building=apartments. Landuse should cover the entire area of the apartments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106805039
Glassman (2021-06-24 02:34:52+00:00): I'm not sure what happened to cause the street to be broken into two, but I reverted the edit. 

#TIP: Use a descriptive changeset comment for the edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106805053
Glassman (2021-06-24 02:35:20+00:00): Again - can you add the building tag back?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106805321
Frame&Focus (2021-10-29 23:09:35+00:00): Although it seems to be fixed in the current changeset, the name and tourism tags were dropped for some reason.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106805563
mbethke (2021-06-23 08:57:54+00:00): I'd rather you stopped adding nonsense than having to delete all of it, but I can keep doing that as well.
5m4u9 (2021-06-25 04:16:58+00:00): gracias por el aporte
streinger (2021-06-27 10:59:57+00:00): возможно, что не вся эта улица Ростошинская называется, у зданий справа, около Нежинского шоссе адрес Раздольная улица.
Otenkiya (2021-06-23 07:55:43+00:00): 報告
ウェイ：国道158号 (151004255、第10版)を分断して国道158号 (957387845、第1版)と国道158号 (957387844、第1版)を作成した結果、リレーション: 国道158号 (31352)に分断が発生。修正済み。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:47:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 12:59:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371860041/history has S=maxar key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Punteado (2021-06-23 07:34:06+00:00): você pode me dizer que merda você fez aqui
KiselaVoda (2021-06-23 22:41:37+00:00): Obrigado pelo feedback, veja minha resposta em https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106813261.

Thanks for the feedback, please see my response on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106813261.
user_5359 (2021-06-25 06:14:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
aceman444 (2023-06-19 12:17:50+00:00): Zdravim, Helios uz davno nefunguje. Odkial teda pochadza nazov ihriska? Ako zdroje uvadzate len snimky Bing, kde nazvy samozrejme nie su. Takze aky je oficialny nazov ihriska?
literan (2021-06-29 17:50:02+00:00): добрый день. Не надо вешать адреску на каждую из частей здания. Адрес ставится на все здание (и он там есть)
pitscheplatsch (2021-06-24 06:17:11+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
bahoom (2021-06-24 06:25:48+00:00): Sorry, committed by accident! Will revert this one and use the sandbox server in the future.
pitscheplatsch (2021-06-24 06:30:20+00:00): Thanks for your answer and for reverting for edit.

#HappyMapping
is-zUser (2023-04-25 13:29:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8094713

Sieht zwar nett aus, aber die überwiegende Nutzung ist Wohngebiet und nicht das Gras. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
Das fehlt für diesen Ort komplett. Die Oberfläche des Bodens kann dann mit anderen Tags (z.B. natural=...) angegeben werden.
GinaroZ (2021-07-21 16:06:23+00:00): Hi, just to make you aware that if you're adding paths you really should make the path connect to another road/path - this one for example is connected to nothing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/957403422
Also, although the Bing imagery is newer and better, it is slightly out of alignment. If you are editing please enable the "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" overlay and align Bing with the blue lines (for me it was about 3.50,-1.50). Thanks! :)
Jakka (2021-06-23 15:29:36+00:00): vous avez enlever "school" "name=École Sainte Marie" elle n'existe plus ? http://ecolesaintemariemorialme.be/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106813159
Punteado (2021-06-23 09:39:51+00:00): Seu idiota, por que diabos você fez isso way 129895204 ,node 1432317301
KiselaVoda (2021-06-23 22:39:57+00:00): Olá Césinha. Eu estava tentando obter o alinhamento mais preciso criando um deslocamento com os traços do Strava GPS. Não tinha percebido que você estava trabalhando na área, mas não deixe de verificar na próxima vez, obrigado por entrar em contato!

Hello Césinha. I was attempting to get the most precise alignment by creating an offset with Strava GPS traces. I hadn’t realized you were working in the area but will be sure to check next time, thanks for reaching out!
Punteado (2021-06-23 09:44:01+00:00): Você é um grande idiota, fodeu todo o trabalho que fiz
KiselaVoda (2021-06-23 22:43:15+00:00): Obrigado pelo feedback, veja minha resposta em https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106813261.

Thanks for the feedback, please see my response on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106813261
AndresDuhour (2022-07-01 21:01:40+00:00): Buenas tardes!
¿Conocés cuál es el nombre abreviado en E. Nelbone?
¡Saludos!
Andrés
Herrieman (2021-06-23 07:57:18+00:00): Excuus, ik had nog gecontroleerd op relaties, maar deze blijkbaar over het hoofd gezien!
eggie (2021-06-23 07:10:17+00:00): Dag de grauw
Je vraagt om feedback.
Straten met een bord woonerf zijn inderdaad living_street. De wettelijke maxspeed hoort dan 15 te zijn ipv 30. (Dijkoever)
Kijk je nog even.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-23 07:26:41+00:00): .. idem Loshaven.. Staat er echt een bord woonerf?  Dan maxspeed=50
eggie (2021-06-23 13:27:33+00:00): Typo.. dan maxspeed 15
WoodWoseWulf (2021-06-27 23:46:40+00:00): Hi!

Is the college currently here, or is it just planned? Might be good to add a lifecycle prefix if it's not there yet.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

for now, I've changed this from a school to a college as it's not a k-12 equivalent institution.
tlconrd (2021-06-28 12:05:02+00:00): they started to pull permits for the campus. There is a notice of filing sign(required for all construction in fontana) in front of the property. I have no clue how to add the construction prefix. if you can add the planned prefix that would be great.
tlconrd (2021-06-28 12:18:04+00:00): I added the planned prefix. not sure if i did it correctly
StefanHRT (2021-06-23 08:09:21+00:00): Hallo streckenkundler, evtl. kann ich Dir einen Tip wegen ID geben (Ich weis, eine bessere Lösung seitens des ID muss her). Wenn ein Weg einen Knotenpunkt auf der z.B. NSG-Grenze hat und dort geteilt wird, hat man die Relation gleich mit getrennt. Im ID ist es eine einfache Lösung, den Weg außerhalb der Relation oder anderer Nodes zu trennen und dann zu den "getrennten Mode" schieben, dadurch entstehen meiner Erfahrung nach kaum noch Probleme. VG
ralley (2021-06-23 19:18:18+00:00): NZ uses metric speed limits
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106817592
willisturm (2021-06-25 07:04:46+00:00): Hi Ralley,
thank you for the hint. Now it's fixed
Warin61 (2021-06-24 01:57:17+00:00): The relation is tagged as a 'river' yet a member way is tagged as a 'stream'.

So what is it? A river or a stream? It cannot be both.
ShakyIsles (2021-06-24 07:16:47+00:00): From the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:waterway

"Hint: If the waterway starts as a stream and becomes larger, then use the tag of the largest waterway (e.g. river). This is purely informational, the stream members still need their own waterway=* tag."
ShakyIsles (2021-06-24 07:17:54+00:00): The section that is narrow I tagged as a stream.

The overall Maramataha River relation is tagged as a river
Warin61 (2021-06-25 03:54:40+00:00): Thanks. I find that 'river relation' a bit strange! 
A stream is OSM defined as something you can jump/step over IIRC. I suppose <2m.
dvdhoven (2021-06-23 10:30:14+00:00): Aub als principe aanhouden geen wegen doorverbinden.
Als je een weg door verbindt kan een routerelatie niet meer afslaan.
En in OSM lopen heel veel  routerelaties.
In dit geval was de Elisabeth van Loonstraat doorverbonden over de Laan van Moerkerken, waardoor rcn route 15-50 en 21-22 niet meer konden afslaan naar de Molenweg
Ik heb de weg weer doorgeknipt en de routes hersteld.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
FERINA365 (2021-06-23 11:44:35+00:00): Bedankt voor het herstellen Dick. Ik maak die fout wel vaker... Ik zal er voortaan rekening mee houden en controleren of er geen routes over de segmenten lopen. Excuus! :)
JuanjoMC (2021-06-23 08:28:43+00:00): Hi,

just out of curiosity, what was the routing issue here?
wardmuylaert (2021-06-24 11:56:27+00:00): Trying to route from the south sidewalk of Romeinsesteenweg to Oude Lindestraat made it go a detour to find a connection that crosses the road. My solution seemed nicer than adding more unmarked crossings, but I'm a bit biased against seemingly pointless sidewalk mapping when a tag on the street seems fine.
mavl (2021-06-24 14:56:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет водоразборную колонку с названием "Колонка".  "Колонка" это не название, а тип объекта.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8859158503/history  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-06-23 07:25:00+00:00): https://maproulette.org/challenge/17412/task/97110180
Gropitza (2021-06-23 08:50:36+00:00): https://kartaview.org/details/3642293/42/track-info
Gropitza (2021-06-23 08:50:50+00:00): https://kartaview.org/details/3642293/42/track-info
eggie (2021-06-23 07:52:57+00:00): Dag Martijn.. Heb je ook rekening gehouden met de busroutes?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-23 07:55:50+00:00): Lijn 107  gaat nu tegen het verkeer in de Naarderstraat op.
Overigens is het splitsen van de weg goeg gegaan.
Martijn-VR-Gooi en Vechtstreek (2021-06-23 07:56:23+00:00): Goedemorgen Eggie,
Uhm, nee. Moet je die ook toevoegen dan?
eggie (2021-06-23 08:00:33+00:00): Nog iets om op te letten.. Je nieuwe afslag had geen verbinding met het fietspad. Maak altijd een verbindingsnode
Kijk je nog even naar Bus 107?
Laat weten als je hulp nodig hebt.
Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106819546
MVG
eggie
Martijn-VR-Gooi en Vechtstreek (2021-06-23 08:09:51+00:00): ha Eggie,
Ik ga het meenemen.
als ik vragen heb, kom ik erop terug.

m.vr.gr.
martijn.
eggie (2021-06-23 08:11:16+00:00): Nou...  wanneer je nog een afslag maakt en je maakt het traject waar de bus op rijdt tegengesteld oneway=yes dan komt de route van de buslijn in de problemen.
Hier zie je de oude situatie met bus 107 https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.22741/5.17753&layers=O
Dus dan  de Naarderstraat opknippen en de relatie van dat kleine stukje Naarderstraat verwijderen (Alleen bus 107..hetzelfde bij het stuk naarderstraat dat je oneway hebt gemaakt en op het nieuwe stukje de relatie weer invoegen op de juiste plaats.
Dus als de de weg van het station hebt geselecteerd na het geselecteerde stuk.
Wanneer het abacadabra lijkt waar ik het over hebt wil ik het ook wel doen.
eggie
Martijn-VR-Gooi en Vechtstreek (2021-06-23 08:15:40+00:00): Voor nu is het even abacadabra, dus als je in de gelegenheid bent, graag, dan kijk ik later wel in de aanpassing hoe het moet.
ik zit nu in een overleg (even tussen door reageren)
alvast bedankt.
m.vr.gr.
eggie (2021-06-23 08:38:27+00:00): Done...  
Gewoon simpel aangepakt .. de wegen omgeruild. Nu volgt de bus weer over het juiste traject. 
De gebroken mp landuse=retail heb ik ook hersteld. Die zat helaas vastgeplakt aan al die wegen en dan gaat dat bij bewerken mis. 
Tip.. Kijk goed van te voren of er routerelaties lopen (wandel, fiets, OV)
Gr eggie
Martijn-VR-Gooi en Vechtstreek (2021-06-23 08:40:18+00:00): top. bedankt voor het aanpassen 
m.vr.gr.
martijn.
tastrax (2021-06-30 10:38:56+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
eggie (2021-06-23 08:14:34+00:00): Welkom bij OSM
Kijk even hier hoe een bedrijf toe te voegen. Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM
Eigen bedrijf toevoegen 

https://www.onosm.org/ 

en 

 

https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/11/46.87897/8.23975 

 

En video 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6edDUi1o9RA 

MVG
eggie
Gropitza (2021-06-23 08:49:53+00:00): https://kartaview.org/details/2342890/1452/track-info
eggie (2021-06-23 08:19:10+00:00): Dag Getiem.. Ben nu toch aan het kijken.
name=Grafheuvel is niet correct.. Behalve als de naam Grafheuvel is.
Meestal is dat niet zo.. Het is een... grafheuvel.
Dus ook niet even als voorbeeld name=hunebed (wel dus name=Papeloze Kerk)
en 
name=bankje name=huis name=bos

Kijk even hier hoe een grafheuvel te mappen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:site_type%3Dtumulus

Succes,
eggie
woodpeck (2021-06-26 20:15:43+00:00): Dear Neena2309, if you are working for Grab then please mention that in your user profile. Thank you!
Neena2309 (2021-06-30 06:47:56+00:00): Thanks Woodpeck..! Mentioned the same on my profile.
user_5359 (2021-06-23 18:28:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use the key ref instead of "ref id".
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
tastrax (2021-06-30 10:40:39+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
maraf24 (2021-06-23 18:59:38+00:00): Takie kasowanie wymaga uzasadnienia.
JPinAR (2021-06-29 16:21:20+00:00): Umm why where my very large and extensive changes around the new Walmart HO campus reverted and deleted. You appear to be a person specializing in GIS work but you undid some very significant and timely changes because of road closures having to do with the New HO Campus and reverted new roads and routes that are part of a major detour. I have local knowledge and GPS data that I used for these edits and in trying to help support my community realized that the changes and work I have done are gone over what should be some minor edit corrections.
JPinAR (2021-06-29 16:30:10+00:00): P.S. I'll be happy to fix whatever you saw as an issue but I need this change set reverted ASAP.
JPinAR (2021-06-29 17:34:57+00:00): Sorry for being so spammy with this but I have reverted the changes as I see you used Bing and ESRI data for reference please note I have street level view of the new construction with GPS data under Map Data > Mapillary. You should be able to independently verify the accuracy of my data and the out dated nature of the satellite imagery through comparison of these two.
ZhenyaBarashko (2021-06-29 17:38:54+00:00): Thanks for your report. The reason why we mapped the territory is the discrepancy between roads and satellite images. The driver wrote to us that there is a road (highway=residential; name=Southeast Martin Luther King Jr Parkway) that goes through the building (Walmart). We totally improved the territory; we'd like to ask you to return some of the edits where you agree. Should you have any questions please contact me. Thanks, Zhenya.
JPinAR (2021-06-30 12:31:04+00:00): So the area in question from 72-Central (N) to 102-14th (S) and from Moberly (E) to J St (W) has almost entirely been bought up by Walmart for the construction of a new Home Office campus spanning the entire are nearly every building in this area has been demolished and the building process has begun as has the relocation of roads. There is no longer a DC 6008 which I believe is the building you received a complaint about there is a road and a new building in their place. I am actually a contributing member for the new Home Office’s goal for getting 10% of associates biking to work instead of driving so I have full access to the to-be layout of the future campus so you will see not only that I’ve added and changed the existing roads but I have a number of proposed roads and buildings sketched out where they will be added in the future.

As for the accuracy of my mapping based on the above even the most recent of satellite imagery is useless. I have been mapping recently by biking along the open sections of road with a GPS 360 camera which I’ve loaded to Mapillary (see Mapillary under Map Data > Imagery data). I’ve used this GPS line which is the sidewalk between the roads and the building to get reasonably accurate estimate of the placement of roads and buildings. If a road or building is misplaced they would have to overlap my GPS route and from the in person capture you should be able to clearly see I’m never in a building or on the road but in between them. My only guess as to what may have been seen would be an offset between the street and building details being updated at different times where the road MLK was updated but the old building update was lagging behind or different zoom levels where at different stages of update when viewed in some way. I’m not familiar with the MapBox updating process but with an IT background I could see this as more likely an artifact that a real issue. If you feel the reverted changes are in error please use my Mapillary data as a basis for review and not the Satellite data. Or if you must use satellite data maybe reference the City of Bentonville commissioned 2020 imagery which likewise supports my edits and the numberous proposed edits that line up with the current edit state.
https://gis.bentonvillear.com/Html5/Index.html?viewer=master
tux67 (2021-06-23 10:05:11+00:00): Kleiner Hinweis: landuses und Wege miteinander zu "verkleben" ist zum großen Teil verpönt, weil das die Wartbarkeit massiv einschränkt (auch wenn ID als Editor dieses Verhalten unterstützt).

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106823679
Schlepes (2021-06-23 10:22:56+00:00): Gut zu wissen :D 

Dann werde ich das hier noch ändern
tux67 (2021-06-23 10:46:37+00:00): Prima, danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106823679