piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
southglos (2017-09-12 11:13:13+00:00): That appears to be picking up the nearest postcode it can find, which is that house on Charles Close.  You get the same when clicking on the farm buildings just to the north.

The actual data is correct (or rather, it's not incorrect) - the houses on Otter Way do not have any postcodes set.

Easiest way to fix, I imagine, is to add postcodes to any properties you know them for.  Just add an "addr:postcode" tag with the correct value.
Steve Mapping (2017-09-12 13:29:27+00:00): I’ve added a few post codes to houses in Otter Way, Fox Close & Badger Road. They show the correct post code now, but the others still show the incorrected address. Will look back tomorrow & see if they updated & change. 
Otherwise it looks like the tool you are using are picking the nearest post code. Which could mean you need to set the post code at least for the first building you add in a new area.
southglos (2017-09-12 17:22:29+00:00): I think you misunderstand - the postcodes aren't coming from me or any tool I'm using.
Where they're coming from is a tool *you're* using - namely OpenStreetMap Nominatim - when you click on "Show address".  It's guessing the postcode (incorrectly) from the nearest building with a postcode it can find.  If you use "Query features" rather than "Show address", you'll see the actual data for the building.
The incorrect postcodes you're seeing through "Show address" are purely best guesses generated for you when you use the Nominatim tool.
Steve Mapping (2017-09-18 14:21:07+00:00): I’ve added a few post codes to houses in Otter Way, Fox Close & Badger Road a week ago. They show the correct post code now, but the others still show the incorrected address. 
The farm buildings north of the area have changed to the new nearest post code, but the houses you added that I did not charge the post code on  still show the wrong post code.
I agree the incorrect postcodes I am seeing through "Show address" are purely best guesses generated, but the houses you entered are stuck at the post code from the guess on the day you entered them, so its something to do with how you enter them as the farm buildings have changed to the new nearest address.
I am not going to pursue this anymore, but to me it looks like, if you are block adding buildings with the tool you use it would seem to suggest that the first one entered in any area should at least have the address & post code set as something is being set at a low level in the background that can’t be seen.
southglos (2017-09-18 14:46:46+00:00): Hmm, no; there's nothing set at a lower level than can be queried from the database or examined in the planet dump, and besides, incomplete data is the norm (building get traced from imagery, addresses get added from surveys, postcodes come along later from other sources of info); it's rare to be able to add everything at once.
A little bit of research on Nominatim reveals this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/FAQ#How_was_the_address_calculated.3F
which is worth reading, in particular the section on (lack of) postcode support.
To reiterate - this is not a problem with how the houses are mapped or tagged, it's just one less-than-perfect tool you're using to look at the data.
The best thing to do is to carry on mapping, carry on adding postcodes to houses wherever we know them, and not to worry about what comes out of Nominatim.
Happy mapping.
PT-53 (2017-09-10 15:45:43+00:00): Hallo johnemerald,
ist der von Dir gelöschte Weg dort wirklich weg ? Auf den Luftbilderrn im Geoportal BW (Stand 2016 ?) ist er noch gut zu sehen!
Die Form des Spielplatzes stimmt ebenfals nicht mit dem Luftbild überein. Da sind große Differenzen!
Grüße
johnemerald (2017-09-11 18:33:34+00:00): Hallo PT-53, 
der Weg ist weg...zumindest ist da kein sinnvoll befahrbarer Weg. Ungefähr in seinem Verlauf steht eine Affenschaukel. Falls du natürlich etwas Wiese als Weg zählst, ist da ein Weg. Am Ende des Spielplatz gibt es theoretisch eine Art Trampelpfad, der aber im Wald endet/ verwachsen ist. An der Straße  versperren ein paar Parkplätze sowieso die eingetragene Zufahrt.

Den Spielplatz hab ich nur skizziert, damit er wenigstens drin ist; du kannst ihn gerne genauer skizzieren.
johnemerald (2017-09-11 18:34:14+00:00): PS: Ich wohne vor Ort, kann bei Bedarf also alles genau nachschauen, wenns nötig ist
PT-53 (2017-09-12 09:38:17+00:00): Hallo johnemerald,
ich habe das Spielplatz-Gelände anhand des Mapbox-Satelittenbildes überarbeitet.
Grüße
eggie (2017-09-10 19:17:24+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd. Graag concreet commentaar met wat je hebt toegevoegd.
eggie (2017-09-10 19:22:50+00:00): Building=yes niet toevoegen aan adresnodes. Die heb ik verwijderd. Succes met mappen voor het HOT osm project in Nepal.
Constable (2017-09-10 15:37:41+00:00): Ciao, cos'è questa relazione "SENTIERONE"? in meno di 2 ore la hai modificata 15 volte e sembra che tu abbia anche corrotto una relazione in prossimità della località Moscoretto, quindi adesso tutta la zona che era correttamente mappata come campi risulta essere tutt'altro https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3102541
Per favore smetti di modificare la mappa con i ritmi attuali.
Cosa vuoi aggiungere?
Alecs01 (2017-09-15 16:34:19+00:00): Ora dovrebbe essere a posto l'area uso del suolo danneggiata, compresa la continuità del "Sentierone" http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=7562141&_noCache=on non sono certo il massimo questi mega-multipoligoni chiusi dalle strade ...
Constable (2017-09-15 16:56:44+00:00): Perfetto, grazie Alecs
Jackomino84 (2017-09-16 16:01:43+00:00): grazie. scusate ancora.
user_5359 (2017-09-10 15:57:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Hjart (2017-09-10 16:30:05+00:00): Hmm, jeg har tidligere idag overvejet at tage inititiativ til at få fjernet alle disse uuid:building :-)
literan (2017-09-10 16:44:58+00:00): Здравствуйте! корректный тег для подъездов - entrance=staircase
Scondo (2017-09-10 18:12:02+00:00): А, точно... никогда раньше просто не придавал внимания тегированию подъездов.

Спасибо!
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-11 15:45:08+00:00): Hello sc113. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429656569 it should be `disused:building=detached`, right? The key `disused:building=house` doesn't really make sense. #newkey
sc113 (2017-09-11 19:05:58+00:00): Thanks, bad copy-paste fixed :)
GerdP (2017-09-11 09:36:49+00:00): Hi!
Fixed typo highway=driveway again, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51933548
BCNorwich (2017-09-10 17:13:33+00:00): Hi, a sidewalk is a footway beside a vehicular highway so I've removed the sidewalk tag.
BCNorwich (2017-09-10 17:15:28+00:00): Hi, removed the sidewalk tag, sidewalk is beside vehicular highway.
eggie (2017-09-21 07:51:56+00:00): Nu edits in Nederland. Ik stuur je een welkomstbericht per PB
eggie (2017-09-10 19:48:38+00:00): Dit lijkt me niet helemaal op z'n plaats. Ik haal het gebouw weg. Wat was je bedoeling?
PB met welkom gestuurd.
eggie (2017-09-10 19:50:51+00:00): Gebouw verwijderd
eggie (2017-09-10 19:50:19+00:00): Wat is je bedoeling hier?
eggie (2017-09-10 19:52:22+00:00): Je plaatst hier gebouwen op gebouwen. Dat komt de kaart niet ten goede, http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51910082
eggie (2017-09-10 19:52:38+00:00): reverted
chihchun (2018-01-07 04:30:32+00:00): 您好，里程碑的正確標示方法為 highway=milestone. 

* Zh-hant:Tag:highway=milestone - OpenStreetMap Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Tag:highway%3Dmilestone
chihchun (2018-01-07 04:44:16+00:00): 已經協助修正。

correct milestone from tourism = information https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55227372
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-11 15:36:41+00:00): Hallo WolfiDE. Was willst du mit `access:customer&&disabled=yes` bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523326158 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523326151 aussagen bzw. erreichen? Das auf diesem Parkplatz Kunden und Behinderte parken dürfen? Dann wäre es wohl eher ein `access=customers;disabled`, oder? #newkey
WolfiDE (2017-09-12 01:24:37+00:00): Hi,
das sind Kundenparklätze, die Behinderten vorbehalten sind.
Ich habe mich dabei an folgendem Proposal orientiert:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/parking
Dort heißt es:
"If you need to tag "a person who is a customer AND a parent" (at the same time), put both keys in one line separated by "&&". Example: access:customer&&parent=*."
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-12 04:06:49+00:00): Punkt für dich ... man lernt halt nie aus. Ich hätte da wahrscheinlich ein "komplexeres" Konstrukt genommen: Der Parkplatz (amenity=parking) selbst ist ja für customers (access=custommers) und in diesem Parkplatz hätte ich dann wohl die zwei "Stellflächen" a la amenity=parking_space mit parking_space=disabled hinzugefügt, siehe das Beispiel hier: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space#Beispielhafte_Darstellung_der_End-Karte
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-11 15:13:42+00:00): Hallo Galbinus. Bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523328768 sollte es vermutlich eher ein `lanes:backward` anstatt `landes:backward` sein, oder? #newkey #typo
Galbinus (2017-09-12 13:33:46+00:00): Klar. Habe es korrigiert. Danke. Gerne beim nächsten mal einfach selber korrigieren.
BCNorwich (2017-09-10 17:38:33+00:00): My apologies for not welcoming you to OpenStreetMap. Welcome to OSM!
I wanted to explain that this section of Mapletree Lane which is part of St Peter's Way is included in relation (#140,533) specifically for the way. Therefore your addition of the footway is unnecessary and is also a duplication of the highway, two highways on the same ground sharing the same node points).
I've just made sure the section is properly entered in the relation then removed the duplication. 
No harm done, little mistakes are all part of learning. You've made a very good contribution to OSM with the several new cycleways you added. 
Regards Bernard
murble (2018-04-08 21:40:53+00:00): Why do you think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523329368 is a farm yard rather than residential?? what source did you use for this edit?
Glucosamine (2018-04-23 13:23:07+00:00): If you have more up to date survey data then please do make the change.
A67-A67 (2017-10-16 15:15:12+00:00): Bedankt voor de toevoegingen. Ik heb twee opmerkingen:
- Ten eerste is de naam Voddijkpad ook aan een schakel in het wandelknooppuntennet meegegeven. Deze schakels zijn in principe naamloos. Het pad zelf krijgt de naam Voddijkpad.
- Ten tweede is het pad op access=no gezet. Dit betekent dat je er nooit mag komen. Het pad is toch alleen verboden toegang tussen 15 maart en 15 juli? Dat werd al aangegeven met access:conditional=no@(Mar 15 - Jul 15).
Ik heb daarom de access=no verwijderd.
corfede (2017-09-11 21:39:29+00:00): Almiverde S.r.l. 3,0 - 2 recensioni??? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425574652) E' esattamente quanto riportato su Google Maps, dove 3,0 è il punteggio relativo alle 2 recensioni...
corfede (2017-09-16 10:15:07+00:00): Siccome continui a dire che non copi più da Google Maps, dopo le tragiche esperienze passate che hanno comportato diversi revert, purtroppo questo changeset conferma i miei sospetti, più volte espressi. Anche il toponimo "via Torchiarolo" assegnato a tre diverse strade in campagna, come su GMaps, fa venire più di qualche dubbio.
sommerluk (2017-09-11 14:12:34+00:00): 👍
Cascafico (2017-09-11 09:56:11+00:00): This changeset has been made by a known vandal, usally active in Trs. 

Please check his/her edits.
eggie (2017-09-10 19:45:46+00:00): Het is weer een beetje een discussie op het forum(zie link welkomstmail) , maar naar consensus graag alle info op de BAG-adresnode bijplaatsen.
ThibaultDu (2017-09-24 10:44:26+00:00): Hej,

Skulle du kunna lägga lite mer information i dina kommentarer och vilken data du använder för att rita? (Både i dena changset och i de två senaste för Vallastaden). 
Jag justerade ett antal vägar för två veckor sedan efter GPS spår som jag skapade, och några av dina ändringar avviker från de GPS spåren som jag skapade då, och därför är jag nyfiken på vilken data du har använt. 

Mvh
riiga (2017-09-25 17:31:45+00:00): Vilka vägar har jag felaktigt ändrat? Isf vill jag givetvis rätta till dem.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-11 15:29:33+00:00): Hallo Aufräumer. Sollte es bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98013920 nicht eher `addr:housename` anstatt `addr:housname` heißen oder vielleicht sogar eher nur `name`? #newkey #typo
eggie (2017-09-10 19:43:24+00:00): Probeer steeds het commentaar in te vullen.
bv Kapperszaak toegevoegd
Chris Fleming (2017-09-12 10:57:50+00:00): Hi Bruce - Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see you requested a review and I've had a quick look over them and they look good.

Thanks for Editing and let me know if you have any questions.
Jrachi (2025-03-14 07:58:12+00:00): Ciao.
Hai inserito un percorso escursionistico (route=hiking che è in una rete ippica (network=lhn)
Quale è sbagliato?

Ivo
geow (2025-03-14 21:54:44+00:00): Grazie, ottima osservazione :-)
È successo 7 anni fa e purtroppo non ricordo perché ho aggiunto network=lhn. Probabilmente è stata una svista, sentitevi liberi di cancellarla o di cambiarla in lwn o rwn.
Ciao,
geow
Alecs01 (2017-09-15 17:24:49+00:00): E' un po' complessa la mappatura da queste parti, ma evita comunque per favore di sovrapporre una strada ad un'altra, grazie
Jackomino84 (2017-09-16 16:01:11+00:00): Ok
literan (2017-09-11 13:10:05+00:00): осталось на entrance=staircase поправить )
ToniE (2017-09-11 09:34:42+00:00): Hallo Lukas,

ich habe hier und bei anderen Edits bemerkt, dass Du einige Tags gesetzt hast, die hier (bei residential) überflüssig sind, da sie bei highway=residential automatisch mit diesen Werten angenommen werden:

bridge=no, tunnel=no, access=yes, bicycle=yes (widerspricht cycleway=no), oneway=no, motor_vehicle=yes, ...

Auf der anderen Seite hast Du bei Bushaltestellen das wichtige (!) public_transport=platform entfernt. Das ist bei der Analyses im Rahmen der täglichen Qualitätssicherung bei ÖPNV aufgefallen.

Bitte informiere Dich im Wiki über die Tags, ihre Bedeutung und die Zusammenhänge. Wenn Unklarheit besteht, eher "nichts verändern" anstatt zu "löschen".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Main_Page

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features

Viele Grüße
Toni
lukaswelte (2017-09-11 10:18:10+00:00): Hallo Toni,

Dem war ich mir nicht bewusst. Insbesondere wusste ich nicht das das "highway=bus_stop" nicht mehr empfohlen ist sondern inzwischen "public_transport=platform" markiert werden soll. Ich sehe zu mich beim nächsten mal noch gründlicher zu informieren. 

Vielen Dank für die Infos und das checken.

Beste Grüße,
Lukas
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-11 15:00:28+00:00): Hallo lyctkel, bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5095292426 sollte es wohl ein `source` anstatt `soutrce`sein, oder?
Aufräumer (2017-09-11 05:45:50+00:00): Hallo
diese Änderung hat ein ungültiges Multipolygon hinterlassen. Ich habe versucht es wieder in Ordnung zu bringen (siehe Änderungssatz: 51927264)
Gruss
SomeoneElse (2017-09-12 11:28:15+00:00): Hello,
You may want to double-check the border here since I had to revert a couple of wikimapia-derived edits.
Best Regards,
Andy (Data Working Group)
Władysław Komorek (2017-09-12 11:35:29+00:00): So far I don't see any problems.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-12 11:43:35+00:00): Neither did I (though there's a hole in the Indian boundary that I mentioned at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=663343#p663343 ), but I thought I'd better let you know just in case.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-11 15:44:39+00:00): Hi,
Is the definitely a deli (as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=deli?uselang=en-GB ) rather than the usual sandwich / other fresh food place?  It's a while since I've walked past the door (it's a long way uphill from most of Matlock) but my recollection was more Sandwich-y?
Best Regards,
Andy
kjon (2017-09-11 20:09:02+00:00): Hi Andy, feel free to change if you think fast food suits better.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-12 12:04:50+00:00): I'll have a look the next time that I'm there.
Hjart (2017-09-19 21:56:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/535621838  ligner en fejl
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2017-09-19 22:18:27+00:00): jo, tak
highflyer74 (2017-09-11 06:24:04+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Vielen Dank für die von Dir hinzugefügten Adressen! Wenn Du Häuser einzeichnest, achte darauf, daß diese möglichst genau dem Grundriss entsprechen und sich die Linien nicht überschneiden. Ansonsten sieht es schon recht gut aus :-)

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
jblome (2017-09-11 15:44:38+00:00): Moin,
danke für die Tipps, ich probiers gleich mal aus.
Grüße zurück :-)
user_5359 (2017-09-10 18:17:03+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Soll "building:levels=0“ bedeuten, dass der Verein im Erdgeschoß beheimatet ist? Dann bitte level=0 verwenden, so hat das Gebäude eine Bauhöhe von 0 Geschoßen.
Uwe Ziegenhagen (2017-09-10 18:28:30+00:00): Habe es angepasst, danke für den Hinweis.
user_5359 (2017-09-11 14:29:25+00:00): Hallo, nicht ganz richtig gemeint war nicht building:level sondern level.

Leider gibt es derzeit noch kein genaues Tag für Einrichtungen für gemeinsames Arbeiten (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:community_centre:for )
sander79 (2018-01-30 07:13:56+00:00): Hoi,

je hebt verschillende bollards toegevoegd zonder dat deze aan een node hangen. Deze hebben dan geen nut.

Als je een rij met bollards wil maken dan kan dat met een way. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
samjakbal (2018-01-31 13:07:47+00:00): Hallo,
Ik heb inderdaad op sommige plaatsen bollards toegevoegd zonder deze aan een node te hangen. Ik trachtte dit te reflecteren aan de realiteit zonder dat het een functionele waarde had. Indien het niet nodig is, kan ik de betreffende bollards weer verwijderen.
Dankjewel voor de alertheid.
eggie (2017-09-10 19:26:09+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-10 19:29:34+00:00): name:nl is niet nodig in Nederland en kan er af.
mueschel (2017-09-11 11:23:57+00:00): Hi,
you are using some new tags to describe fire hydrants. There is already an established scheme for tagging used thousands of times, including these tags:
fire_hydrant:coupling_type
fire_hydrant:couplings
fire_hydrant:pillar
fire_hydrant:type
fire_hydrant:wrench

See here for more:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fire_hydrant#similar

Jan
simone_girardelli (2017-09-11 16:25:15+00:00): Use automatic translation.

Hello mueschel,
tags you quoted are those of today in this page [0] there are changes with new tags, they replace some tags for hydrants or similar.
The page should be in the approval phase and a short (there is certainty) become predefined tags for the mapping of hydrants.
[0] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant_Extensions
mueschel (2017-09-11 18:31:52+00:00): There is no voting on this proposal yet. Please wait until it has been accepted before changing the tagging of existing nodes on a larger scale.
simone_girardelli (2017-09-11 19:51:22+00:00): You speak italian? :)

Grant me a month, Meanwhile I am Italian mailing list, if from them I recommend to stay with old tags, up to the final vote, give to replace the tags.

Maybe someone intervenes in the comments of the changeset, let me also this, at the bottom it is to understand what tags are suitable to reality.

Thanks and apologize for my insistence to stay with new tags.
mueschel (2017-09-11 20:10:40+00:00): I'm fine with a new tagging scheme, but we have to keep in mind that this might break existing tools, that don't understand these tags yet.
miox (2017-09-13 07:08:15+00:00): Hi. I agree with mueschel. Before changing the tagging scheme it had better to update the tools that use this data like osmhydrant and openfiremap.
simone_girardelli (2017-09-13 17:13:50+00:00): Ciao, ho rimesso i vecchi tag, per favore controllate se è a osto, ho lasciato wrench=pentagonal, erchè mi pare un dettaglio aggiuntivo che non influisce.

Ciao e grazie per le vostre eventuali.
miox (2017-09-15 13:53:44+00:00): Per me Ok
user_5359 (2017-09-12 18:56:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thank for helping! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. A driveway to a building isn’t a highway=residential, and mostly no compound with the building.
Ingrid1965 (2017-09-12 19:08:09+00:00): I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you are meaning, I marked the buildings as "house", and I marked the driveway as "street".
freebeer (2017-09-12 23:05:40+00:00): Hallo 5359,
I think what you want to say is better written as: don't draw the whole property, but rather try to trace the building outline.
(Ich verstehe auch nicht richtig, `mostly no compound')
Ingrid, I can understand your desire to add so much as quickly as possible, and I also see how difficult it is to trace around such complex outlines, that I personally would leave for a more experienced mapper, with better tools.
It is a shame you were not assigned to a better neighbourhood!
I have tried to trace the outline of one of these houses, compensating for the shadows, palm trees, and the distortion that with experience I have seen from the Bing orthorectification.  I think it took over a minute and still I know I could have done better by my standards, and you probably added the entire neighbourhood in this time.
I appreciate your wishes to contribute to improving the map and adding all buildings in such a short time for such a disaster!  Thanks!
user_5359 (2017-09-14 15:05:55+00:00): Hello,

I am not a native speaker, sorry if my English is not always understandable.

My last sentence should mean that there is no connection from street to house (only if an entrance is drawn in)

I only took a detailed look at the area because a road was drawn across houses and other streets.

Did you see the difference between highway=residential, highway=driveway, highway=footway (hint different width and color)?