piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rskedgell (2020-03-22 10:19:07+00:00): Please read the wiki before you change the value of ref=* for an object. For aeroway=runway, this should be:

'the runway designator (for example "02/20" or "09L/27R"). List the smallest designator first (i.e. "04/22", not "22/04"). The two designators of a runway will always differ by 18 (180 degrees) and can have one letter appended (L, C or R). Only use other values in special cases.'

Prefixing the ref with "Runway " appears to be an ill-advised attempt to tag for the renderer. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Drunway
Tommyf5 (2020-03-30 16:29:10+00:00): I believe some of these are real and I am not sure about the others.
TravGW (2020-03-20 23:47:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by 82449568.

The Harbor Bridge Project is not this far along yet. If you wish to add the project you can use the proposed and construction highway tags. Use proposed for roads that will be built and construction for roads currently being built.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dproposed
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
PerplexingPenguins (2020-03-21 02:01:08+00:00): Where is this source available?
Allison P (2020-03-21 02:37:10+00:00): I found it in a 1900 Boise City directory on Ancestry.com
Allison P (2020-03-21 02:37:29+00:00): The text is available in the Library of Congress.
Allison P (2021-03-22 23:55:36+00:00): A bit late at this point, but the plat book can be downloaded on the Ada County Assessor's website. Also, this section didn't originally line up with River Street. The current alignment has only existed since 2004.
aharvey (2020-03-21 04:32:51+00:00): What's the meaning of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10868380, is there every a case where you can uturn into the same road without a roundabout or turning circle?
DUGA (2021-10-24 19:52:06+00:00): I expanded a little bit, to avoid thinking of PlayStation Portable.

Are they present all the time?
Scharf Energy Systems (2021-10-24 20:17:29+00:00): I'm not sure if they are or not.  I just know that I have seen them there a number of times.  It might just be a common checkpoint location, like Rt8 going North into Franklin.
avena701 (2021-01-30 13:59:34+00:00): network:type=network ist für Fahrradknotenpunktnetzwerke. Ich weiß nicht, was du hier gemeint hast? Ich lösche die zwei network-Tags. Viele Grüße
mariotomo (2021-05-20 01:41:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93859310
#adt, again.
TravGW (2020-03-20 23:37:01+00:00): Forgot to readd the editor tag.
Edited by JOSM v15937
pilsa (2020-03-21 12:36:33+00:00): دوست عزیز جابجا کردن خطوط اسمش ویرایش نیست و بیشتر وقت تلف کردن هست . لطف کنید خطوط را جابجا نکنید . اول افست تصویر با خطوط را تنظیم کنید بعدا اگر اطلاعات مهمی وجود داشت دست به تغییر بزنید .شما هیچ اطلاعات مهمی به نقشه متاسفانه اضافه نکردید که هیچ فقط زحمت ما رو بیشتر میکنید .
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82450120
Suny2020 (2020-03-24 19:29:01+00:00): متشکرم بابت توضیحات. من برای هماهنگی بیشتر راه ها با Maxar Premium Imagery آن ها را جا به جا کردم.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-21 00:32:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 82348851, 82349064, 82349112, 82349181, 82351429, 82351479, 82351518, 82351676, 82351728, 82351810, 82351826, 82351883, 82351925, 82351978, 82352055, 82352067, 82352118, 82352128, 82352198, 82352249, 82352306, 82352359, 82352376, 82352420, 82352473, 82352527, 82352580, 82352606, 82352648, 82352659, 82352720, 82352760, 82352768, 82352784, 82352860, 82352942, 82352949, 82353005, 82353075, 82353119, 82353145, 82353165, 82363817, 82363917, 82363974, 82363980, 82364017, 82364029, 82364047, 82364103, 82364141, 82364152, 82364189, 82364205, 82364216, 82364280, 82364335, 82364340, 82364380, 82364428, 82364438, 82364478, 82364484, 82364536, 82364585, 82364625, 82364664, 82364766, 82364823, 82364875, 82364895, 82364929, 82364960, 82364990, 82364998, 82365030, 82365053, 82365071, 82365096, 82365143, 82365263, 82365309, 82365335, 82365339, 82365394, 82365400, 82365425, 82365456, 82365477, 82365552, 82365572, 82365598, 82365629, 82365656, 82365696, 82365717, 82396127, 82396278, 82396533, 82396578, 82398175, 82398517, 82399708, 82399913, 82400136.
user_5359 (2020-03-21 11:23:30+00:00): Hello! Please check the tags of way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/783200253 . What is the meaning of the tag 6=23?
WoodWoseWulf (2020-03-21 05:50:02+00:00): Hi Hayden,
Welcome to OSM!
It looks like you accidentally added natural=coastline to the parking lot in this changeset. 
I have removed that tag, but if you want more information, you can read about natural=coastline here - 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=coastline
ComfortablyNumb (2020-03-21 00:52:18+00:00): Does this look OK?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-21 01:12:57+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 82402549, 82402600, 82402616, 82402877, 82403747, 82403785, 82403805, 82404711, 82404761, 82404786, 82404807, 82404871, 82404950, 82405033, 82405285, 82405329, 82405425, 82406445, 82406522, 82406670, 82407176, 82407327, 82407356, 82407462, 82407563, 82407618, 82407643, 82407722, 82407760, 82407764, 82407808, 82407951, 82407988, 82408119, 82408288, 82408329, 82408368, 82408393, 82420924, 82420963, 82421206, 82421352, 82421479, 82421547, 82421989, 82422087, 82422262, 82422342, 82422384, 82423750, 82423802, 82426629, 82427189, 82427309, 82427509, 82427555, 82427594, 82428038, 82430955, 82431017, 82431597, 82431833, 82431902, 82431968, 82432193, 82432269, 82433537, 82433711, 82433861, 82433961, 82434312, 82434889, 82435289, 82435322, 82435778, 82435881, 82447577, 82447613, 82447701, 82447719, 82447869, 82447885, 82447893, 82447926, 82448789, 82448845, 82448861.
tastrax (2020-03-22 03:34:51+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM - Cheers
ralley (2020-03-21 08:29:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  You have added multiple buildings and a road named "Living House" do you have a source for these changes?  OSM is only supposed to reflect on the gound verifiable reality and uses common names not personal names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82450656
gdt (2020-03-21 01:31:27+00:00): This edit removes a way that represents a trail.  The trail was added long ago based on strava, and no mapper has ever seen it.  The  land is now posted no trespassing, so 1) any use of what might exist is unlawful and 2) more importantly, mappers are prohibited from verifying if there is or isn't a trail.   All in all, based on discussion with other active local mappers and landowner representatives I think this phantom maybe-trail shouldn't be on the map, speaking as the local osm steward of this area.  Please feel free to message me if you are upset by this.
SomeoneElse (2020-03-21 10:09:49+00:00): @gdt If the trail doesn't exist any more (or perhaps never really did) then I think that removing it makes perfect sense.  I've certainly removed Strava "trails" that following a survey turned out to be not paths at all, just short-cuts over walls and fences or worse.  Where the trail is visible on aerial imagery it might make sense to keep it as highway=track or whatever, but with access=private on it to stop anyone else adding it without an access tag in the future, but (with the Strava ones that I removed on the other side of the Atlantic) that wasn't the case.
Best Regards,
Andy
BCNorwich (2020-03-24 17:36:57+00:00): Hi, You added the tag highway=service to Way: Slough Trading Estate industrial railway (554725236). Thus making a duplicate highway. The tag of highway=unclassified  was already on Way: Malton Avenue (26120212).

I've removed your highway=service tag.

Regards Bernard.
user_5173844 (2020-03-24 19:47:33+00:00): Thanks. My mistake.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-03-21 06:08:50+00:00): Hi theroadimon,
Welcome to OSM!
For your reference, we define parks in a specific way here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
A residential house or a private front yard does not qualify as a park. These kinds of additions will be removed.
Please feel free to reach out if you need any assistance.
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-21 10:27:36+00:00): Hi Ajiem, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason and of course the source of deleting the entire hospital? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious-change-viz?c=82451013

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ralley (2020-03-21 08:25:59+00:00): This edit has dragged street nodes and created all sorts of other issues with roads - fake names, sections tagged living street etc.  Reverting.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82451026
NKA (2020-03-21 07:30:38+00:00): Slike reverts skal diskuteres først, ikke bare gjennomføres. Importen la inn mange hundre nye veier. Du har ødelagt mange timers arbeid her.

Kan du gi eksempler på hva som skulle rettferdiggjøre en slik omfattende revert?
cck (2020-03-21 07:36:44+00:00): Hei NKA, jeg akkurat skrev en direktemelding til deg. Som jeg skrev, var det dessverre ikke mye å disktuere i dette tilfelle. Importen er i strid med prosjektplanen.

Følger opp per direktemelding med eksempler, siden changeset comments tilbyr ikke Markdown.
NKA (2020-03-21 07:50:50+00:00): Jeg vil gjerne at denne diskusjonen skal være offentlig. Her er det du skrev:

Hei NKA, takk for at du nylig prøvde å kjøre NVDB-import her i Kvinnherad.

Jeg var dessverre nødt til å reverte importen. Dette fordi denne importen ødela mange verdifulle bidrag fra den lokale community her. Den introduserte mange feil både i topologi, geometri, og metadata.

En viktig del av nettopp denne importen er å ta vare på eksisterende data. Se også:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Road_import_(Norway)#Conflation.2Fconflicts_with_existing_OSM_data:

ALWAYS keep the OSM data UNLESS you know that the OSM data are wrong […]
 
Fordi importen ble ikke gjennomført i tråd med policy i det at så mye forskjellig data ble slettet, var det dessverre ingen andre muligheter enn revert.

Så vidt jeg kan se, er kvaliteten til NVDB i Kvinnherad stort sett ikke bedre enn det vi allerede hadde i OSM fra før her.

Det betyr at eksisterende data i utgangspunktet må ikke slettes eller erstattes med NVDB gjennom importen!

Det finnes derimot en god del lite brukte skogsveier osv. som mangler helt i OSM, særlig på sørsiden av Kvinnheradsfjorden. Disse skulle kunne importeres helt uten problemer.

Dessuten finnes det visstnok noen enkelttilfeller der NVDB er faktisk litt bedre enn OSM. Jeg har mest lokalkunnskap på nordsiden av fjorden (i Ølve og Hatlestrand) og skal sjekke og fikse dette her etter hvert. Men det kommer å ta tid.

Hvis du har lyst til å arbeide med resten av kommunen, så foreslår jeg at du deler jobben opp i flere enkeltområder, i tråd med policy.

Det beste ville antagelig være å begynne helt sør i kommunen (Åkra/Fjelbergøyane). Der er det så vidt jeg vet ingen aktiv OSM-community. Det betyr at det kanskje kan være litt mindre viktig å ta vare på det som allerede er inne i OSM.

Hilsen, cck
NKA (2020-03-21 07:55:26+00:00): Du har ikke gitt ett eneste eksempel, så det er umulig å ta stilling til ditt påståtte grunnlag for å gjøre revert, annet enn at du tydeligvis ikke liker at noen importerer i kommunen din.

Importen jeg gjennomførte la til 2600 nye veier som ikke var der fra før, og den forbedret topologi for ca 1600 veier. Den tok også vare på ca 900 veier/stier som ikke var i NVDB.

Du har ødelagt tre dagers arbeid. Jeg er helt målløs over noen kan gjøre slikt.
cck (2020-03-21 09:27:01+00:00): Jeg har ingenting imot å være offentlig, men som sagt er disse changeset comments dårlig egnet til kompleks kommunikasjon. La oss tar dette til mailinglisten.

https://lists.nuug.no/pipermail/kart/2020-March/thread.html

Jeg innser nå at jeg har handlet i feil rekkefølge. Jeg beklager dette!

Men det endrer ikke det faktum at jeg kunne like godt svare: Det er ikke jeg som har ødelagt ditt arbeid – men heller er vårt arbeid her desverre blitt ødelagt gjennom denne importen.

Allikevel, jeg beklager nå virkelig at jeg revertet uten å ta kontakt først.
Gazer75 (2020-03-21 15:20:07+00:00): Det smarte var om du hadde gitt beskjed om at Kvinnherad skulle takast av lokale folk manuelt. Ved å sette nokon som ansvarleg på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Road_import_(Norway)/Progress så ville det ikkje vore problem.
cck (2020-03-21 19:03:50+00:00): @Gazer75:
Veldig godt poeng. Men tydeligvis var jeg ikke smart nok her :-/

Mens jeg i prinsippet var kjent med prosjektet om vegdata-import, har jeg ikke fulgt framgangen i detalj gjennom årene. Jeg hadde faktisk sett på Progress-tabellen av og til etter den ble diskutert på den internasjonale [imports]–listen, men tanken om å legge inn en slik notat slo meg aldri, dessverre…
freebeer (2020-04-04 05:39:43+00:00): see comment to https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2125898
G1asshouse (2020-05-18 07:07:59+00:00): Wislander, you are always welcome to message me about my edits. I'd be happy to explain my reasoning. I can't speak for Natfoot yet with 14,950 edits he might be responsive.
I have removed my section of the separate cycleway. No need for unnecessary OSM bloat, I'm sure you understand.
Since, the cycleway along Roosevelt Way Northeast resembles the one, you have disabled, along Northeast Ravenna Boulevard, should it be corrected to match the cycleway mapping standard of the surrounding area (University / Seattle / Washington)? Not me, just someone.
wislander (2020-05-19 05:11:16+00:00): Hey G1asshouse,

I think at the time I only noticed Natfoot's name on the separate cycleways and overlooked yours, so I had only commented on changeset 73198958. When I didn't hear anything back for a few days, I went ahead and edited. Sorry for not reaching out to you as well!

One difference with Roosevelt vs Ravenna is that Roosevelt has those bus stop islands between the car lanes and the bike lane. I left the cycleways alone there because I thought that information might be important to someone, but I can also see the logic for making it consistent with Ravenna.
G1asshouse (2020-05-20 00:11:07+00:00): At the moment, none of the transit platforms or traffic calming islands(?) are in the OSM database. I think, converting Roosevelt Way NE will not result in any loss of information.

I agree that knowing that the bus stops are platforms, separated from the sidewalk by a cycleway, is important (such as to the blind). Going forward, what is the locally prefered way to include this information seems like a topic for a local OSM group or the OSM mailing list (Talk-us-pugetsound). That's my two-cents but I leave it up to you (or others).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
wireguy (2020-03-21 16:49:13+00:00): Hi fordelit!   Welcome to OSM!   You marked some highways as 'pedestrian'.  They should be changed to highway=footway, surface=asphalt, bicycle=yes, segregated=no.   You also have extra crossing nodes and unnecessary noexits.   There is also a highway you created calle promanade overlapping the existing road.   It should be removed.   Please make corrections.  If you have any questions, just ask and I'll try and help.
tastrax (2020-03-22 03:33:35+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM - Cheers
nevw (2020-03-21 08:38:09+00:00): I reverted this business addition due to deficient tagging method.
nevw (2020-03-21 08:45:57+00:00): Adding a name and all other info in a description tag is not suitable.
 Please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 
or https://www.onosm.org/# to initially help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags.
trigpoint (2020-03-21 15:01:35+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Please keep you changesets to sensible areas, adding buildings on two different continents should have been split into at least two changesets as it creates a large bounding boxes that other mappers see in their area.

Please also use meaningful changeset comments which actually describe what you are doing. Meaningless hashtags alone are gobbledygook and tell the OSM community nothing.

Cheers Phil
tordans (2020-03-21 05:55:47+00:00): Geoportal Berlin / Berlin Zoom
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-21 10:23:40+00:00): Hi alan_greenspun, welcome to OSM.

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

Your changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious-change-viz?c=82452576

#GolfMapping
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Warin61 (2020-04-15 05:25:03+00:00): Reverted.
yadathot (2020-03-21 06:49:22+00:00): Edited Highway Tag and Modified the geometry of the roads as per latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.
user_5359 (2020-03-21 10:27:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (you are not a church). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
Ryan Delgado (2020-03-21 10:46:18+00:00): I have added my business location. Please reactive it. I'll be happy.
user_5359 (2020-03-21 11:04:15+00:00): Thanks for the feedback! I will gladly help to create the correct entry. What business does your company do, because you are not a church: Is this a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
Ryan Delgado (2020-03-21 11:11:40+00:00): This is my office.
SomeoneElse (2020-03-21 11:13:57+00:00): Hi Arventure NY Inc,
Just wondered - what suggested that you add it as a church?  Was there a set of instructions that you were following somewhere, or was it suggested by what you typed in when you edited the map?
Best Regards,
Andy
Ryan Delgado (2020-03-21 11:26:25+00:00): I don't suggested, I was following a set of instruction to add this map.
If there anything wrong please notify me. I'll edit it.
user_5359 (2020-03-21 11:32:08+00:00): Can Andy and I see this instruction? And please note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and an address, have little sense.
Ryan Delgado (2020-03-21 11:36:53+00:00): I think I have a mistake of my name. I edit it.
Best Regards
Ryan
SomeoneElse (2020-03-22 12:21:47+00:00): Echoing user_5359 above, it would be great to see the set of instructions that you're following.  If you'd like to share it privately you can send it to data@osmfoundation.org rather than posting here.
Best Regards,
Andy
(from OSM's Data Working Group)
user_5359 (2020-03-21 10:25:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
stefanct (2020-08-10 13:52:43+00:00): Bzgl. way 730773773 und 69974047: abandoned=yes ist eine ganze schlechte Idee: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:abandoned=yes

Warst du dort? Auf der Basemap ist der westliche Weg noch drauf und mit dem Track nördlich verbunden. Lt. basemap ist auch ca. am Ende des westlichen Weges ein Gebäude.
gt3400 (2020-08-10 16:42:19+00:00): Ja ich war dort und bin den gesamten Weg abgegangen. Der Weg beginnt dort wo er eingezeichnet ist. Davor ist nichts zu erkennen. Der Weg ist zugewachsen und praktisch nicht mehr zu begehen. Würde ich nur im Notfall verwenden. Was wäre ein besserer Tag?
gt3400 (2020-08-10 16:45:32+00:00): Etwas genauer: Ich bin 730773773 abgegangen (das ist ein alter Forstweg). Von 69974047 habe ich nur von unten den Anfang gesucht, aber der ist auch fast nicht mehr auffindbar und er endet unten in einem alten Forstweg der so zugewachsen ist, dass er nicht  einmal begehbar ist.
stefanct (2020-08-10 16:55:02+00:00): Alles klar, vielen Dank. Alternative siehe Link: highway:abandoned=path/track/was auch immer es war. Dann wird's in den meisten Karten einfach ignoriert und nicht fürs Routing herangezogen. das abandoned=yes wertet kaum eine Software aus, siehe auch osm.org selbst: Rendering sieht gleich aus, routing geht ganz normal drüber.

BTW, wenn dir meine Fragen zur Qualitätsprüfung noch nicht auf die Nerven gehen... ;) das könntest du vl. auch wissen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2302042
gt3400 (2020-08-11 07:50:36+00:00): OK, ich habe das jetzt auf abandoned:highway=path gesetzt.
user_5359 (2020-03-22 09:20:04+00:00): Hello! You add on difference parking slots the key amenity=car_pooling=<..name..> with the same value from the key name. The better way ist to add an additional node.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-10-22 14:53:22+00:00): Hallo Joris,

Ik zie dat je het fietspad langs Jan Van Gentstraat (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592398326) apart hebt uitgetekend, vermoedelijk omdat het daar allemaal is heraangelegd.

Nu vroeg ik me af (in het kader van het uittekenen van het Functioneel Fietsroutenetwerk Antwerpen) hoe fietsers van/naar Vlaamsekaai en Pacificatiestraat gaan
Jorisbo (2020-10-22 15:02:56+00:00): Hallo Peter, op de beelden lijkt het dat er gewoon fietspad is aan beide zijden. Ik zal er morgen wel eens langsfietsen dan weet ik het zeker.
gr Joris
Jorisbo (2020-10-22 15:03:38+00:00): Sorry, ik bedoel Pieter :-)
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-10-22 16:23:53+00:00): Amai, wat een service!
user_5359 (2020-03-21 15:04:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags 
cadc:2019=131124102204
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
CENTRALHUB (2020-03-22 18:16:37+00:00): It's the China Administrative Division Code in 2019. With this code it's possible to join the OSM data with other sources.  Source website: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2019/index.html. 

Wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property:P442
user_5359 (2020-03-22 19:21:00+00:00): Is the license of this source compatible with the OSM license and has the import been arranged? In any case, a corresponding Wiki entry is useful. Why is the year necessary? Does it change for a range between years? Otherwise the default value for the key ref:cadc.
CENTRALHUB (2020-03-22 20:05:24+00:00): No license info is listed but the code is in public use in Wikipedia/Wikidata and elsewhere, since it's the only official data released by the state authority. And it's not imported because no geo-location info is available. All the data is manually input. It's possible that the code will change if an admin unit is changed, e.g., conversion from county to city. If you prefer ref:cadc, I can change the name of the key.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-22 13:50:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82483629 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans and Germany.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3582 for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-22 13:50:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82483629 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans and Germany.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3582 for more information.