piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2020-07-16 21:29:20+00:00): Hi, you provide no source for your added data of the shops and facilities (not, Bing isn't it). So what is it?
Also, please less advertising in the 'description' tag, it does not belong into OSM.
user_5359 (2020-01-03 05:40:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't add ojects twice (once as node and a second time as area).
chimani (2020-01-03 12:50:56+00:00): Thanks for the reminder! The node was already there but the national park status is new so I wasn't sure if I should delete the node and transfer it to the area.
mueschel (2020-01-03 10:57:50+00:00): Hi,
could you check all these roof:* tags here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760172632

I guess you wanted to add some 3rd tags instead, e.g. 3rd:height1?
phidauex (2020-01-14 20:02:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for bringing so many addresses in, but I think the import dataset needs cleanup before being imported - does this import have a discussion page already?

In particular, many street names are coming in malformed - for instance, in Ouray, points like this address (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7103252271) are coming in with the street name of "2Nd", rather than "2nd Street" as it should be. Can you take a look and try to fix these using the original dataset, rather than fixing one at a time?
rsavoye (2020-01-15 04:33:56+00:00): Thanks for paying attention! Sorry that slid in. I didn't see anything using OSMinspector and other validation tools, but they missed this. I just uploaded the fixed street names. I'll look for related issues. The Ouray fire department needs addresses so navigation works. I'm about to make another pass through the address data as it usually has to be tweaked to match the road so this will improve over the next few days. I just got to Ouray last night so I can do other validation.
phidauex (2020-01-15 17:00:51+00:00): Thanks for taking a look at it, definitely want to get these addresses right. My favorite tool for address validation is Geofabrick's address validator - this is the long permalink to the Ouray area: 

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-107.67073&lat=38.02237&zoom=16&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber_lenient,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads

The nice thing is that it shows you when the address doesn't match a street, and when it DOES match a street, it draws a line from the building to the street it is matched to, which is helpful in verifying that you have connected it to the correct street.
rsavoye (2020-01-17 02:46:36+00:00): I use that too, but it requires the data to be uploaded first. :-) There's often obscure spelling differences between the streets and the address. I use what the street sign says. But yes, unless it's accurate, navigation doesn't work.
Mike Baggaley (2020-03-30 20:19:33+00:00): Hi, the  Augustine Camino route is marked as travelling along way 4420685, a private track named The Mint. I think it should go further along Church Hill before turning into St Nicholas Church. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
AlwynWellington (2020-03-31 01:44:28+00:00): Mike, thanks for your enquiry.

I became aware of this route in mid 2019 and purchased the guidebook.

And I had it on my list to walk when in this part of the UK in mid 2020.  I use an Android app on my tablet for all my walks, no matter where in the world, and so need them mapped before setting out.

In December 2019 I downloaded the GPX file and my mapping of the route followed that source.

I have gone back to that material and find, in this locality I have faithfully followed the GPX trace: that is along "The Mint".

All I can suggest if you have more recent or local knowledge that you make changes as you see fit.

All I ask is that you ensure the end result is contiguous so that, when displayed in the OSM referred tool WayMarkedTrails, the elevation profile is displayed.

Take care at this time.

Alan
AlwynWellington (2020-04-09 03:06:53+00:00): Mike, I've used some spare time that has become available to clear my desk.
And I found my hard copy of the Augustine Camino Walking Guide.
The guide says it uses maps from the OS 1:25000 series.  And, like maps of the same area at the same scale, details are different.
The pages are not numbered: the relevant page in that guide is about three or four after the centre,
The path traced on that map does not relate to the GPX file, at the level of detail shown.
Iv'e also looked at FootPathMaps.com.  This uses OS maps and shows public paths at certain levels of detail.  That was unhelpful also.
I write as I note you have not yet made the changes you mentioned to me.
Please be assured, OSM being the work of many contributors, I do feel any sense of "ownership" of the work I have done.

I did walk the NDW route in August 2016.  Looking at it afresh I would now most probably, having crossed over the A2 continue ahead and, depending on the time of day, enjoy some refreshments in an appropriate establishment before making the final strike towards the Cathedral.

As Her Majesty wrote to me and my compatriots earlier this week, kia kaha, kia maia, kia manawanui (be strong, confident and patient).

Alan
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:04:40+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
streckenkundler (2020-01-03 14:10:16+00:00): Revert due to license violation. official data of Brandenburg may not be used.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79158812.
dx125 (2020-01-03 07:56:32+00:00): Du hast hier die Straßenführung umgebaut, wobei Du Dich vermutlich auch an den verfügbaren Luftbildern orientiert hast.
Die früher unfallträchtige Kreuzung wurde im Zuge des Ausbaus der B188 und der fast vollständigen Ausstattung mit Leitplanken in diesem Bereich auf 2 Einzelkreuzungen aufgeteilt, das konntest Du wahrscheinlich nicht wissen. Der neue Zustand war ja bereits gemappt, wobei ich auch eigene (allerdings nicht hoch geladene) GPS-Spuren verwendet hatte. Man müsste Deinen Änderungssatz jetzt eigentlich reverten. Machst Du das bitte oder soll ich es tun? 
Das hier https://geoportal.brandenburg.de/geodaten/suche-nach-geodaten/
dürfen wir als Quelle zwar nicht benutzen, aber du kannst es Dir hier trotzdem mal anschauen ;-)
Abendstund (2020-01-03 13:58:23+00:00): Hey, danke für den Hinweis. Mea culpa, das war dumm von mir. Sorry!
Ich komme erst später wieder an JOSM. Wenn du magst, darfst du gern den Revert machen!
dx125 (2020-01-03 15:51:23+00:00): ist erledigt
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:04:30+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:04:26+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
streckenkundler (2020-01-03 14:10:34+00:00): Revert due to license violation. official data of Brandenburg may not be used.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79158812.
markbegbie (2021-11-30 08:29:18+00:00): Hi there,
I removed the natural=water and water=reservoir tags you had added to the concrete storage tank, in line with the guidelines here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:water%3Dreservoir#Types_of_Reservoirs
aceman444 (2020-11-22 12:09:43+00:00): Hi, advertising does not belong into OSM, that 'description' is quite overboard.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:04:21+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
streckenkundler (2020-01-03 14:11:38+00:00): Revert due to license violation. official data of Brandenburg may not be used.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79158730
mueschel (2020-01-03 10:52:01+00:00): Moin,
was ist denn 'wrin_sign = yes'?

Gruß
Jan
KartoGrapHiti (2020-01-05 15:11:56+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Das ist ein Schreibfehler. Ich habe es korrigiert in wrong_sign=yes. So lassen sich Schilder erfassen, die nicht (mehr) der StVO entsprechen und getauscht werden müssen. Zeichen 626 ist seit 10 Jahren in Kombination mit 222 nicht mehr zulässig. https://fragdenstaat.de/anfrage/erlasse-zur-umsetzung-der-stvo/433288/anhang/2010_06_21Nichtigkeitder46.VerordnungzurnderungstraenverkehrsrechtlicherVorschriften_geschwaerzt.pdf Die Halteverbotsschilder stehen an Stellen, wo schon per Markierung ein Halteverbot gilt. Doppelbeschilderung ist unnötig/nicht zulässig. Der Hinweis ist hilfreich, weil damit klar wird, dass das Schild recht bald geändert wird und man so in einigen Monaten die Tags ändern kann, so wie hier: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6178365398/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5871688524/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6188638988/history
streckenkundler (2020-01-02 23:17:15+00:00): Hei,

für die Brandenburgischen amtlichen Daten wie Alkis oder so gibt es KEINE Datenfreigabe für OSM die derzeitige Lizenz ist inkompaktibel zu OSM. Bitte verwende NICHT diese Daten. 
Die bereits erfassten Daten müssen aus OSM raus!

Sorry, Da gibt es auch keinen Disskussionsspielraum und kein wenn und aber. Ich werde mich morgen darum kümmern.

streckenkundler
streckenkundler (2020-01-03 14:11:57+00:00): Revert due to license violation. official data of Brandenburg may not be used.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79158730
user_5359 (2020-01-03 05:22:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you know the area https://www.osm.org/way/711329774 ? your entry is a duplicate entry.
user_5359 (2020-01-03 05:00:24+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kurze Frage zum Gebäude https://www.osm.org/way/392723618/history. Wurde das Gebäude abgerissen oder ist nur der Getränkeladen geschlossen? In letzteren Fall sollte nicht der Schlüssel building nicht nach landuse geändert werden.
SirStone (2020-01-07 18:24:49+00:00): Der Getränke-Laden ist geschlossen worden. 
Werde den Fehler beheben.
aceman444 (2022-01-15 19:15:19+00:00): Hi, why does building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760408411 have 0 levels and why does it coved the parking place?
StephaneP (2020-01-03 09:12:26+00:00): Salut,

Il existe vraiment ce bâtiment ? Il n'est visible nul part sur les imageries aériennes ni sur le cadastre.
Sinon, "hangar sncf", ce n'est pas son nom, juste une description.

Stf
eggie (2020-01-03 07:19:02+00:00): Beste Wim.. Probeer in je commentaar bij ipload je edits te beschrijven. Dus bv "accesstag honden aangepast".

Is het wel en wandelpad? highway=footway..  Een wandelpad heeft geen tracktype. Dat hoort bij een highway=track
Een track is geschikt voor voertuigen met 4 wielen. tractor..bv.
Een track met surface=grass kan geen tracktype=grade2 hebben. Dat is dan meestal gravel. (half verhard)
Dat zal 3, 4 of 5 wellicht zijn? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
streckenkundler (2020-01-02 23:28:27+00:00): Bitte unterlasse die nutzung von ALKIS BB. Das ist ein Lizenzverstoß. Das CS wird morgen revertet. 
streckenkundler
streckenkundler (2020-01-03 14:12:21+00:00): Revert due to license violation. official data of Brandenburg may not be used.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79158730
gurglypipe (2020-01-05 11:07:18+00:00): Hi, these changes have upset the OSL Musical Chairs tool, which now thinks that Red Pike Close and High Style Close don’t exist on OSM (but do exist in the OSL list). Is there anything which can be done about this to rectify the false positive in the tool? Thanks.
Mike Baggaley (2020-01-06 00:01:27+00:00): Hi, I'm not familiar with that tool. I suggest the best bet it to get the tool modified so it understands the lifecycle prefixes. A quick look at the tool suggests that it has not been updated for several years (and hence predates lifecycle prefixes) and that the code also does not examine old_name or old_ref:

						if event == _event_start and value[0] == "nd":
							member_buffer.append ( ( value[1]["ref"] , way_id ) )
						elif event == _event_start and value[0] == "tag":
							if value[1]["k"] == "name":
								way_name = value[1]["v"]
							elif value[1]["k"] == "ref":
								way_ref = value[1]["v"]
							elif value[1]["k"] == "name:en":
								way_name_en = value[1]["v"]
							elif value[1]["k"] == "name:cy":
								way_name_cy = value[1]["v"]
							elif value[1]["k"] == "name:gd":
								way_name_gd = value[1]["v"]
							elif value[1]["k"] == "alt_name":
								way_alt_name = value[1]["v"]
							elif value[1]["k"] == "not:name":
								way_not_name = value[1]["v"]
							elif value[1]["k"] == "note":
								way_note = value[1]["v"]
							elif value[1]["k"] == "notes":
								way_notes = value[1]["v"]
							elif value[1]["k"] == "highway":
								is_highway = True
						elif event == _event_end and value == "way":
							break

Regards,
Mike
gurglypipe (2020-01-16 00:57:47+00:00): That makes sense. Looking into it more closely, it seems the OSL dataset was withdrawn in 2015, so the OSLMC tool is never going to be useful again until it’s updated to use the replacement OS Open Names dataset, and that’s too much of a change for me to tackle. :(

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OS_Locator#Discontinued
Polarbear (2020-06-23 15:05:44+00:00): Hallo johndoe,
wieso legst du etliche Busrouten über die für jeglichen Motorverkehr gesperrte und zum Abriss anstehende östliche Allende-Brücke (w 10275151) ?
streckenkundler (2020-01-02 23:37:52+00:00): Bitte unterlasse die nutzung von ALKIS BB. Das ist ein Lizenzverstoß. Das CS wird morgen revertet.
streckenkundler
streckenkundler (2020-01-03 14:12:43+00:00): Revert due to license violation. official data of Brandenburg may not be used.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79158730
jaffadog (2020-01-02 23:57:35+00:00): yo gusto el agua!
pangoSE (2020-01-15 08:20:49+00:00): Hi! Could you please add the source URL for the mentioned map to the route?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79134463
AlwynWellington (2020-01-15 23:12:07+00:00): http://www.stolavsleden.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Hike_Map_juni2019.pdf

This seems to be a Swedish production.

There were a number of alternatives which I resolved, in the interests of one contiguous route for - in particular - hiking.WayMarkedTrails.com, using this recent version.

I understand St Olavsleden, starting in eastern Sweden is different from St Olav's Way starting in Oslo, although they both finish in Trondheim.

Kia kaha
AlwynWellington (2020-01-15 23:19:59+00:00): 
PS: 
I included website www.stolavsleden.com when making these various adjustments last month.

Kia ora
pangoSE (2020-01-16 07:57:05+00:00): Could you please add this source in a source= tag?.
Also it seems to start in central sundsvall which our route does not. Could you fix that?
AlwynWellington (2020-01-16 21:46:26+00:00): I think you have an impression I have revised the whole of St Olavsleden to the Norwegian border.

My focus was simply those parts that were preventing apps, such as hiking.WayMarkedTrails.org, from fulfilling their brief.  So my use of the most recent resource is limited.  As such I do not think it appropriate to include as part of the route header.  Doing so may give a wrong impression.  You, of course, are quite welcome to make that addition, or not, as you choose.

In carrying out my self appointed task I did not compare the route as now shown in OSM from one end to the other with the (official?) source I used to resolve presenting issues.

Accordingly I don't feel competent to make further adjustments, such as deciding where the route (officially) starts.

Having said that, as a visitor (even to other sites in my own country) I find it incredibly helpful for any route to start near a major arrival point.  

In this case I would welcome a start at a train station where services from Stockholm arrive.

Kia ora
AlwynWellington (2020-01-16 22:00:25+00:00): PS:
Looks as though someone else has complied on OSM with your suggestion to me.

And I note (as I write) the latest map form the StOlavsleden.com site still shows a start in Sundsvall.

I note I should be able to walk from Sundsvall Station to Selanager.  This is under 10 km and so under 2 hours, depending on conditions.

Kia kaha
pangoSE (2020-01-17 08:30:08+00:00): Hi :)
Thanks for the thorough response. Would you care to elaborate this "My focus was simply those parts that were preventing apps, such as hiking.WayMarkedTrails.org, from fulfilling their brief. "
What part of the website did not work with this route?
AlwynWellington (2020-01-17 22:08:59+00:00): Nga mihi

WayMarkedTrails (WMT) does two things.

1) Show the route:
Each element, part of a road, path etc is displayed.  WMT does not have much of a concern here: it just shows each element.  When we look at them the route appears fully connected, so long as every element in the route has been added to the route relation.  In this case "relation 9482456 St. Olav's Path - swedish part"

2) show the elevation profile
When using WMT select the relation above (it has an identifier of a red cross on a white ground) then select "Elevation Profile".  When I looked at this a few moments ago it showed an uninterrupted (but bumpy) line from Selanger to the border.
Someone else more recently has created another route relation.  This is relation 10524322 St. Olav's Path and has the identifier SO.  Select that then select elevation profile.  After a few moments you will see quite a disordered jumble and the annotation "Route is potentially unordered or incomplete. Elevation information might be inaccurate."

I chose to work with what seemed the "official" site and with "relation 9482456 St. Olav's Path - swedish part" to get rid of discontinuities to give the profile result you  see.  

Hope that helps

Kia kaha
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:04:17+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:04:12+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:04:08+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
EliotB (2021-05-29 03:20:40+00:00): This changset seems to have deleted the Orbiter route relation?
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:04:03+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:03:59+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:03:55+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
luiswoo (2020-01-03 01:15:42+00:00): Приложение к "Постановление об утверждении документации по планировке территории (проект планировки территории и проект межевания территории) в районе Ростовского моря."
Fadlilaa IRM-RV (2021-01-15 04:43:13+00:00): I made some improvement of your work based on Maxar Premium Imagery. Thank you
pa_vani (2022-04-18 12:50:30+00:00): Hi Fadlilaa IRM-ED, 

Hope you are doing well! Thank you for editing the data.
Supaplex (2020-01-03 09:38:42+00:00): 有異用字的狀況，是「上舘里」
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79136423
map per (2021-04-26 07:37:56+00:00): Hallo RoHyman,

was ist eigentlich mit dem Namen "Mühlbach-old" gemeint? Heißt der Bach noch Mühlbach (das wäre dann name=Mühlbach) oder hieß der Bach nur früher Mühlbach (das wäre dann old_name=Mühlbach)?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
map per (2021-04-26 07:38:19+00:00): Ach ja und es geht um diesen Bach: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760427209
RoHyman (2021-04-26 10:08:32+00:00): Ich bin mir nicht sicher ob old_name=Mühlbach hier richtig ist.
Hier fliesst nur noch Wasser aus der Isar bei Hochwasser hinein,
da die Isar vor einigen Jahren ihr Flussbett verlegt hat. 
Vorher floss hier voll der Mühlbach bis Koordinaten 47.999135:11.476988 
ist aber inzwischen durch den verlegten Isarlauf unterbrochen.
Der eigentliche Mühlbach fliesst jetzt vorher bei Koordinaten 47.992384:11.475398 direkt in die Isar.
Viele Grüße RoHyman
map per (2021-04-26 10:37:05+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Antwort.
Was hältst du davon den aktuellen Namen zu löschen und statdessen in description zu vermerken das der Bach früher mal Teil des Mühlbachs war?
RoHyman (2021-04-27 01:29:44+00:00): Hört sich gut an.
Grüße RoHyman
map per (2021-04-27 06:26:24+00:00): Ok, habs umgesetzt
user_5359 (2020-01-05 09:41:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! What is the meaning of handicap:forward? Exists also a handicap:backward (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Forward_%26_backward,_left_%26_right) ?
holmes10 (2020-01-05 14:01:15+00:00): The course has multiple sets of tees and the handicap for the “forward” tees, which are the shortest yardage (also known as the ladies tees) have a different handicap rating than the other tee boxes.  This is denoted per the directions here... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
user_5359 (2020-01-05 15:57:18+00:00): I always like to learn something new and actually there is a variation of the tees under the explanation of golf=hole, but they are marked with colors (or gender) not with forward.
holmes10 (2020-01-05 19:40:49+00:00): Every course names their tees differently (and tend to have different numbers of tee boxes), so there’s no good way to standardize these with colors or numbers. For this course, the tees are named as follows (from longest to shortest)...Championship, Medal, Member, Club, and Forward.  The first 4 have the same handicap values, but the Forward tees have different handicap values.
ralley (2020-01-03 03:13:14+00:00): Why remove the no-exit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79137782
davidwim (2020-01-03 07:58:47+00:00): Because it’s a Private Driveway and not a Road??
ralley (2020-01-03 08:06:03+00:00): That does not change the fact there is no exit
BCNorwich (2020-01-05 15:05:19+00:00): Hi, The name on the building in large letters for all to see is The Kensington Hotel. So this is the on the ground information OSM should take as the hotel name.
You may however have a case for adding an alternative as an official name. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name  

Thus I have returned the name to the original one.

Regards Bernard.
ralley (2020-01-03 04:19:18+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  Rather than drawing footpaths as seperate ways usual practice in NZ is to add sidewalk tags to the existing road.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79139769
luiswoo (2020-01-03 05:33:45+00:00): тут действительно есть остановка?
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-06-17 09:24:24+00:00): Sorry for introducing null edits.
Alan Bragg (2020-01-18 22:26:05+00:00): Nice mapping. Just curious, what does "hum" mean?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79140999
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-15 16:47:47+00:00): Please keep an eye out for lane and placement tags, as this will affect where the line itself needs to be placed.  You moved all the lanes on this ramp out of alignment to the right.
karragha (2020-03-16 05:52:23+00:00): Hi Baloo,

Thanks for correcting the issue. I shall consider this as a learning and will be watchful of my future edits.
Looking forward to learning from the community

Regards,
karragha.
mueschel (2020-01-04 10:18:19+00:00): Please make sure you don't upload your internal QA markers('dupe') to the OSM database!
sis651 (2020-01-04 11:49:09+00:00): I couldn't understand what you mean. I was trying to figure out how that AI thing works on JOSM.
mueschel (2020-01-04 12:00:37+00:00): This node had a  dupe=...  tag before I removed it:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7103841477/history