piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Andreas Binder (2016-12-19 18:32:19+00:00): Ja, in dieser Gegend könnte sich ein Mapper noch austoben. Nicht nur, dass kaum landuses erfasst wurden (Ich persönlich finde zumindest landuse=residential;forest wichtig) auch sind kaum Adressen erfasst, obwohl wir in AT so was tolles wie basemap.at als Datenquelle verwenden dürfen. Deine Landuses sehen plausibel aus. Mach ruhig so weiter... Grüße Andreas
geow (2016-12-19 20:29:02+00:00): Hi Felix, einfach in iD beim Editieren die "alt"-Taste drücken, das verhindert das unbeabsichtigte "snapping" auf die nächste Linie. Weitere Tastenküzel, siehe 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:ID/Shortcuts

Oder was noch besser wäre, probiere mal JOSM aus :-)

Gruß
Klaus
pnorman (2016-12-19 19:56:37+00:00): Hi,

Welcome back to OpenStreetMap after a long break!

When saving your changes, it would be good to used a changeset comment that concisely and adequately describes what you did. You can read more about changeset comments at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

And, welcome back

Paul
jbohmdk (2016-12-21 17:43:53+00:00): Why did you delete a bunch of tags from this node that I just edited.  And with a meaningless changeset comment ("tagging error fixed", "local knowledge", "bing", with no explanation of why you think my tags are an error, what Bing air/sat photos could say about tagging errors or how someone from Sachsen could have "local knowledge" of a node in Denmark).
DevonF (2016-12-20 05:54:31+00:00): Hi, how did you go about mapping these footprints?
Sarvihepo (2016-12-20 19:03:22+00:00): Hi there, since you asked about this edit on the irc channel but I did not have a chance to answer before you left, here's what I would say:

I think by and large the things you have done are correct. I expect that someone might have tagged the climbing, guesthouse and restaurant separately. For example, in the current setting it might be a bit ambiguous, whether the capacity=40 refers to the restaurant, or climbing wall, or the guesthouse. I do understand that you probably meant it to refer to the restaurant, where the capacity tag is most often used.

Thanks a ton for your edit and keep up the good work.
mavl (2016-12-20 04:39:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены. К номеру дома не нужно дописывать номер квартиры.
santamariense (2016-12-19 20:48:33+00:00): No lugar de "leisure_1", eu criaria um ponto dentro da área para marcar como leisure=playground. Se toda a área for um playground, nem a marcaria como park.
Osm1980 (2019-01-09 17:26:37+00:00): salam chera tag misr ro be unclassified taghir dadid?
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 21:23:47+00:00): Das Gemeindeamt hat schon einen Präfix name:prefix:at=Gemeindeamt, du hast hier quasi "Gemeindeamt Gemeindeamt Tobadil" draus gemacht.
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 21:28:48+00:00): AT: revert CS 44523817 44523885 44523984, for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects without specifying a source; moving place nodes for the renderer; moving objects without reason;
in CS 48515095
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 21:27:41+00:00): AT: revert CS 44523817 44523885 44523984, for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects without specifying a source; moving place nodes for the renderer; moving objects without reason;
in CS 48515095
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 21:27:34+00:00): AT: revert CS 44523817 44523885 44523984, for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects without specifying a source; moving place nodes for the renderer; moving objects without reason;
in CS 48515095
SomeoneElse (2017-06-19 14:36:30+00:00): I suspect that the former railway at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32678501/history has grown an extra tree_row tag by mistake?
dudone (2017-06-20 20:21:48+00:00): Thanks for spotting this.  I've removed the tag.
Dudley
user_5359 (2016-12-20 10:00:52+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Punkt, die nur einen Namen besitzen sind sinnlos. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a .
marc__marc (2021-04-02 19:15:35+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4562385955
vous souvenez-vous oü il se trouve exactement ? il n'y a rien à cet endroit sur l'imagerie satellite.
Cordialement,
Marc
maraf24 (2017-11-01 15:30:29+00:00): To, że droga jest gruntowa, to nie oznacza, że jest to highway=track.
RicoElectrico (2017-11-01 18:26:20+00:00): Ktoś już nas szkaluje w uwagach. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/877768

To co, mam zrobić częściowy revercik?
maraf24 (2017-11-01 18:56:29+00:00): Chciałem to ręcznie poprawić:)
RicoElectrico (2017-11-01 19:01:57+00:00): No w sumie też tak patrzę, że mi wywaliło 20 konfliktów przy próbie revertu, chciałem więc zrobić w JOSM-ie changeset:44527286 highway=track, ale mogę Ci przekazać tę przyjemność :D
user_4493657 (2017-11-01 19:49:48+00:00): Jeśli revert jeszcze nie poszedł.. może ja tutaj trochę drogi pozmieniam?
maraf24 (2017-11-01 20:40:45+00:00): Nie mam nic przeciwko:)
user_4493657 (2017-11-01 22:35:19+00:00): Poprawiłem lekko https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53436864#map=12/54.3484/18.1590
PT-53 (2016-12-20 12:27:56+00:00): Hallo jstjst,
willkommen bei OSM.

Deine Öffnungszeiten-Einträge bedürfen einer Überarbeitung / Korrektur. die Beschreibung hierzu findest Du hier:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
Machst Du das noch ?

Grüße aus dem Landkreis BC
jstjst (2016-12-20 13:08:34+00:00): Hallo,
ich verstehe nicht ganz was nicht passt?
Gruß Jonas
PT-53 (2016-12-20 19:06:56+00:00): Hallo Jonas,
siehe Abschnitt Werte:
"Für die Wochentage und Monate werden englische Werte verwendet."
Also für Mittwoch "We" verwenden, statt "Mi".
Grüße
geow (2016-12-20 22:00:12+00:00): Ein gutes Tool um syntax-konforme Öffnungszeiten zu erzeugen ist
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
letihu (2017-02-13 19:34:37+00:00): Dieser tag
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4207308002/history
erscheint mir nicht ganz richtig.
Hausnummer 0?
Position?
rza31 (2017-02-13 21:27:34+00:00): Hallo letihu,
die Adresse wurde mit wheelmap in Vers. 1 eingetragen. Für mich wäre addr:city ohne Straße ausreichend.

VG
letihu (2017-02-13 22:08:09+00:00): Stimmt der Standort überhaupt?
Wheelmap macht da reichlich Fehler. Ich sehe da nichts auf der Karte. Was soll das sein?
rza31 (2017-02-14 08:08:12+00:00): Bin leider nichts ortskundig.
letihu (2017-02-14 08:23:36+00:00): Aber der node ist doch von dir. Du solltest nicht mappen, was du nicht kennst.
letihu (2017-02-14 09:31:16+00:00): Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/294913980/history
ist wohl schon alles fertig und an der richtigen Stelle.
rza31 (2017-02-14 19:30:15+00:00): Bitte die History richtig anschauen. Weder habe ich den Node erstellt noch Tags ergänzt oder gelöscht.
letihu (2017-02-14 20:01:34+00:00): Ok, dann fummel man weiter mit der defekten Wheelmap rum. Du willst nicht wirklich vernünftig mitwirken, das hab ich jetzt verstanden. Schade
rza31 (2017-02-14 20:22:46+00:00): Meine Änderung hängt sehr wahrscheinlich mit der "Reparieren Funktion" von JOSM zusammen. unnötige Leerzeichen oder anderes. Keine ungerechtfertigten Anschuldigungen bitte.


Falls du ein Fehler bei wheelmap entdeckt hast kannst du gerne ein issue aufmachen bzw. dich ans Forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=55673&p=2 wenden
RoterEmil (2017-02-10 11:45:31+00:00): Hi, was hat es mit "Annagarten" hier auf sich. Die angegebene Webseite bezieht sich auch auf was ganz anderes. sport=diving?
Könnteste das bitte präzisieren?
merci!
TheSwavu (2016-12-20 00:38:55+00:00): Err... by definition unincorporated areas don't need a admin_level=6 boundary.
cleary (2016-12-20 09:30:31+00:00): Hello Swavu. The Pastoral Unincorporated Area of South Australia is a designated area with boundaries published in the South Australian government Local Government Areas dataset. It is administered differently (it has a "designated authority" rather than a council. But then the metropolitan local government area where I live currently has an administrator rather than a council). If it were not included in the SA Govt dataset, I would not have added it. When driving on the edge of outback South Australia, I have noted that the boundaries are signposted just like other local government boundaries. On the map, the data rarely adds stand-alone boundaries and the main difference to the map will be that existing boundaries will have an additional label added. Since it is in the Govt local government area dataset, I think it has a place equivalent to other local government areas, even though it happens to have the word "unincorporated" in its name.
Regards
Michael Cleary
TheSwavu (2016-12-20 10:27:50+00:00): That may all be true, but this area is not administrated under the Local Government Act so therefore it's not a council and not admin_level 6.
tastrax (2016-12-20 22:46:08+00:00): Given the admin levels are "proposed" in the wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative) what level do you suggest TheSwavu? From my understanding of Australia level 6 is the most appropriate.
TheSwavu (2016-12-21 00:41:00+00:00): No level as it not a thing that you need to map. The unincorporated areas of South Australia are the bits inside the admin_level 4 boundary but not inside an admin_level 6 boundary.
manoharuss (2016-12-20 04:17:18+00:00): Hi ajnunley,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that this trail you tried to map here does not have any feature tags and there are other unconnected nodes here as well. Would be great if you can fix it and trace the trail again.

Best,

Manohar
ajnunley (2016-12-20 15:14:28+00:00): Thanks Manohar! I've been submitting updates using ArcMap's OSM Tool, and this segment just keeps having issues during the submit process. Not sure why. I'll hand edit it :)
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 01:40:10+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43936375, 44034695, 44035471, 44035671, 44048708, 44058015, 44073523, 44074102, 44084611, 44103491, 44170250, 44170578, 44171805, 44172049, 44173267, 44184590, 44196753, 44197303, 44197304, 44197376, 44203209, 44203359, 44203387.
nammala (2016-12-20 06:16:07+00:00): Hi Manuel Primicias,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind adding numbers to the name tag for `tourism=attraction` tags.

regards,
nammala
santamariense (2016-12-20 02:29:49+00:00): Oi Rossano,

A marcação da área do Centro histórico (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460561947/history) como "Área Residencial" estava correta e é muito importante. Considere refazer e deixar no mapa.

Esta notificação você só recebe no e-mail. Então confirme comentando que você leu esta mensagem, e que portanto, verifica os emails que recebe.

Bons mapeamentos.
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:44:19+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-12-20 10:52:41+00:00): 建築還在嗎？
xu3louisyi (2016-12-20 14:42:38+00:00): 建築還在，目前變更為一般私人住宅。
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:46:03+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2017-01-05 07:34:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
oldone1942 (2017-01-05 13:12:29+00:00): I collected it myself. I live in Millgate next to Keenland. BTW Millgate, (both sides of Wickham Way), is also miss named, but ran out of time to make the change. I see a few more needed changes and will work on them.
I'm a former Police Officer and crused all these neiborhoods.
mavl (2017-01-08 15:39:40+00:00): Hello, Adhanom.
The license OpenStreetMap does not allow to use copyrighted data. Did you really use the data of Google Maps?  
  
More information:  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Adhanom (2017-01-10 03:10:45+00:00): Yes, I did this without knowing. I am now using direct source material or my own knowledge. 

Thanks for letting me know
mavl (2017-01-11 16:20:58+00:00): Thank you for the answer. I'm so sorry, but I have to delete the data of this changeset. This changeset contains only one node. I deleted 3 tags:  
addr:country  
addr:postcode  
addr:province
andresgarcia_am (2016-12-20 03:23:46+00:00): Correção: inclusão de praças e de nomes de praças.
andresgarcia_am (2016-12-20 03:21:45+00:00): Correção: inclusão de nome de praça.
maning (2016-12-20 08:45:14+00:00): Hi Ervin, yun ba talga ang mga pangalan ng mga sandbar?
schadow1 (2016-12-20 10:48:52+00:00): Kapitan Andong of Poblacion 4 in Balabac offered to name some unnamed sandbars to the owners of the first tour operator that helped develop the tourism industry in their locality and has been used since last year. Recently he also offered one to us for mapping their islets and replacing some of the names of the islands they say are unknown to the locals. Will be writing about this once I get to have the time.
maps_not_naps (2025-08-21 22:23:38+00:00): Hello schadow1,

I noticed you added this ferry route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460668263) that travels between two small islands, but does not have any ferry terminals. The OSM wiki page for ferries states that "Ferries are a form of public transport that operate to connect road networks and to provide passenger service much like bus service” and “ferry route(s) should start and end at a ferry terminal” (osm.wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry). Based on your knowledge of the area, do you think attraction=boat_ride would be a more appropriate tag than route=ferry (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:attraction%3Dboat_ride)? If so, would you be willing to update the tagging here?

Thank you, and looking forward to hearing from you!
jaap de vries (2016-12-20 15:57:27+00:00): Als je een Parkeerplaats bijwerkt naar een P+R, wil je dan bij de naam dan ook P+R neerzetten? nu staat er enkel +R
74523978 (2016-12-20 21:27:53+00:00): Er staat toch een hele grote P, daaronder +R, samen is dat P+R. Ik vind dat prima zo.
74523978 (2016-12-20 21:56:53+00:00): Ik zie dat het overal zo wordt gedaan; P, nog 'n P en +R, haha :-) ik zal het meenemen in de volgende changeset.
jaap de vries (2016-12-20 22:00:51+00:00): Die betreffen normale parkeerplaatsen,  je hebt zelf dit toegevoegd wat niet klopt.
Weg: +R (29046218)
Diversen corrigeren/bijwerken.

ongeveer 17 uur geleden bewerkt door MrKooken
Versie #6 · Wijzigingenset #44531937
Labels

amenity	parking
name	+R 

Name_P+R is het juiste, als je het even aanpast. Je hebt het immers zelf aangemaakt.
74523978 (2016-12-20 22:22:21+00:00): "niet klopt", kwestie van opvatting... Overbodige argumenten, ik schreef dacht ik al dat ik het zal meenemen in de volgende changeset.
Carnildo (2016-12-20 07:18:27+00:00): Whatever you did to the Waikiki Road bridge over the Little Spokane, it broke the Fairwood boundary relation.  I've fixed it, but please be more careful in the future.
geri-oc (2016-12-23 14:45:34+00:00): gelöscht - da Fehler  Fläche ist kein Building
mueschel (2016-12-26 14:14:48+00:00): Hi,
there are two poles with misspelled tags, 'bname' and 'bane'. 
I think that these and all the name tags should be changed to ref=* - the numbers are not names, but reference numbers.

Cheers, Jan
mavl (2017-10-19 15:58:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53070156 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44533651].
mavl (2017-10-19 15:57:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53070156 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44533651].
mavl (2016-12-20 14:10:48+00:00): Здравствуйте. Очень жаль, что первым делом в качестве теста вы решили навредить проекту OpenStreetMap, исправив правильный адрес дома "Олимпийская улица, 6/1" на неправильный адрес "Плоцкого, 5". Ваши изменения отменены.
mavl (2018-11-01 17:02:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
whb (2016-12-20 22:29:23+00:00): Wurde der Weg wirklich gesperrt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160222379
Immerhin laufen dort mehrere Wanderwege und eine MTB-Route drüber.
wegavision (2016-12-21 06:59:18+00:00): Richtig, war ein Fehler. Dort steht ein 290er also Verbot für alle Fahrzeuge. Wenn da wirklich ein ausgwiesener Radweg durchgeht, kann man das auch nochauf yes setzten, aber das habe ich nicht geshen.
mavl (2017-10-19 15:57:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53070156 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44533651].
mavl (2019-01-13 17:19:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
JandaM (2016-12-20 08:57:53+00:00): Dobry den,

  proc neni udelane cele mesto? Ale jen cast? Melo by se pretrasovat vse jestli se nepletu. Dukuji
mavl (2019-01-13 17:19:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
zaizone (2016-12-20 09:31:45+00:00): Belle réactivité ! La communauté OSM est toujours au top !
trigpoint (2016-12-20 11:18:35+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSN.
Please remember that OSM is a live database and should not be used for test data that does not exist in the real world.
mavl (2017-10-19 15:57:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53070156 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44533651].
FTA (2016-12-23 19:14:46+00:00): Hi there, are you familiar with these objects? I would be wary of editing things strictly by name around the country because, as an example, you added a pharmacy tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111865291/ but its name is not the same as Walgreens. I don't know if it's a typo or a similarly named business, but I would hesitate to make that change unless you were familiar with the area (in which case you should probably update the name if it is a typo).
Happy Mapping and Holidays,
Ethan aka FTA
Omnific (2016-12-23 23:50:51+00:00): Thanks. According to Walgreens' website, that is one of their locations. I've edited it to reflect the fact that it was just misspelled.
mavl (2017-10-19 15:57:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53070156 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44533651].
trigpoint (2016-12-20 20:02:05+00:00): Hi, something went a little wrong with this changset. Whilst you created a building in Japan, you also dragged a crossing node in London. I have fixed the node drag and hopefully did not affect the building.
Geography Canada (2016-12-23 15:42:20+00:00): Meneharia isn't a locality - a locality is a non-populated place.
BeKri (2016-12-21 07:37:32+00:00): Hallo "zhao",
(anderer Name ist mir leider nicht bekannt, auf der Mentz-Seite, auf die Du verweist bist Du leider nicht aufgeführt)
Darf ich fragen, was das mit dem
amenity=parking soll ?
Du bist  sehr intensiv damit beschäftigt an allem möglichen/ unmöglichen Stellen vereinzelte "Park-Nodes" zu setzen.
Was bringt das und 
für was soll das sein ?
Mit der Bitte um Aufklärung und Grüßen
BeKri
dudka (2016-12-20 09:47:05+00:00): будь ласка не розділяйте дороги на окремі полоси, не змінюйте статуси доріг на більш високий, не додавайте круговий рух на перехрестях де його немає

будь ласка додавайте більш детальні коментарі до своїх змін і якщо це можливо то українською мовою
iorant (2016-12-20 10:04:24+00:00): Привіт. Виникло певне обговорення щодо ваших недавніх правок. Наприклад, в осм окремі полоси руху не позначаються окремим лініями, але вказуються у властивостях загальної, основної, лінії. Те ж саме із парковками на узбіччях і тротуарах. На жаль, об'єкти, які ви додаєте, не відповідають дійсності і будуть видалені. Зверніться в укр-гілку форума, там детально пояснять про схеми позначень https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=40
andygol (2016-12-20 10:26:49+00:00): Шановний, viaviridis!

Після обговорення та аналізу ваших правок в Мукачевао ваші набори змін за останні дні було скасовано (44535872 44533375 44529401 44524315 44524247 44524161 44524107 44524092 44523400 44523191 44522962 44522698 44522510 44522043 44512598 44512445 44509215 44498319 44498149 44498020 44497716 44496975 44496545 44496403 44495654 44493812 44493700 44493447 44493189 44493063 44492693 44490246 44490068 44489430 44487683 44487426 44486627 44485689 44485549 44483625 44483521 44483367 44483281 44483205 44482856 44482771 44482734 44482676 44482334 44482211 44482081 44482011 44481997)

Див. - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44537619
mavl (2017-10-19 15:57:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53070156 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44533651].
mavl (2017-10-19 15:58:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53070156 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44533651].
mavl (2017-10-19 15:58:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53070156 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44533651].
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-02-18 02:21:52+00:00): I reverted deletions of two POI's (Petron and Scuola Maria) in this changeset (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46182942), as those places exist on the ground. I did not notice the deletions earlier, until I edited parts of the areas of your Project NOAH-ISAIAH edits. Can you please clarify the reasons for your deletions?
mavl (2017-10-19 15:58:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53070156 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44533651].
Commodoortje (2016-12-25 08:09:34+00:00): Hoi Jaap,
Recentelijk heb je het pand van de Pedaleur aangepast, tot mijn verbazing zag ik dat het een multipolygon is geworden. De muren zijn in een relatie ondergebracht. 
Ik zie op de luchtfoto dat het pand inderdaad groter is dan in de BAG vermeld. 
De relatie was er als iets eerder.
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/6186176
Toch ga ik het pand aanpassen naar een normaal opgezet gebouw met de "nieuwe" contouren.
Commodoortje (2016-12-25 08:11:27+00:00): https://www.dropbox.com/s/oubgs0hriu9rvoh/2016-12-25_09-10-17.png?raw=1
Gerd Meyer (2016-12-20 10:51:34+00:00): Ich habe ausversehen die Mensa der Fritz Reuterschule, die ich erst angelegt habe gelöscht. Kann das bitte jemand rückgängig machen.
Mit bestem Dank im Vorraus
Gerd Meyer