piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
habi (2022-09-15 13:00:42+00:00): Hallo Krönli

Ich bin wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3360282 hier, und wollte einfach mal schauen, was du so mappst.
Dabei fiel mir auf, dass du keine Kommentare zu deinen Änderungssätzen machst.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments für ein paar Hinweise dazu.

Bitte mach doch das in Zukunft, das geht - beim Hochladen - auch tiptop mit Go Map!!

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-16 12:17:37+00:00): Kompletnie nie da się przejść? Jest ogrodzone lub stoją i nie pozwalają? Bo ostatnio jak tam byłem to normalnie dało się przejść przez budowę.
eggie (2022-09-15 12:44:52+00:00): Dag Thiskal.. Lijkt me oke zo.. De oude route heb ik op slot gezet voor fietsers met bicycle= use_sidepath.
Zou de straatnaam van de oversteek Slagendijk zijn of wellicht Den Ekel?

MVG
eggie
Taya_S (2022-09-16 05:55:45+00:00): Denk dat het eerder een deel van Slagendijk is dan Denk Ekel. Zal ik even aanpassen.
eggie (2022-09-16 06:05:12+00:00): Up to you.. bij twijfel kun je de naam ook weglaten.
Groet
Eggie
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
Igor Bubelov (2022-09-15 15:05:07+00:00): The tag payment:bitcoin is deprecated, the correct tag to use is currency:XBT

Here are more details on that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cryptocurrency
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 03:46:49+00:00): Hi Earthkk. Your edit looks awesome, but could you check water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1094704674) due crossing with highways? If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143788778). Thank you.
MxxCon (2022-09-21 07:12:46+00:00): This is SEO spam, you damaged correct building tags and added invalid OSM tags.
This edit was reverted in full.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126211042
TheSwavu (2022-09-21 07:10:30+00:00): Hi,

Your roundabout mapping is not quite correct. Have a read of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout to find out how to map them.

Happy Mapping.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:21:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:22:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
mavl (2022-09-24 04:59:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126568781 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
danieldegroot2 (2022-09-15 15:23:55+00:00): - Was this shop located in the same or a different space as 3 Store?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8259348489/history

- Does 3 Store still exist?

- What level was this shop (and 3 Store) located on?

- Is this space currently vacant?

Adjust as necessary.
b-unicycling (2022-09-15 16:45:23+00:00): It is not vacant as such, they have given up the shop, but haven't vacated. Three was always next door, it was just in the wrong location on the map, because of the lack of house numbering etc.
Niiepce (2022-09-18 16:24:31+00:00): Mehrere Fragen stellen sich mich bei diesem Änderungssatz hier:
Ist das hier ein Eigenname?
siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126331664
Wieso verwendest du denotation=garden? Findest du nicht das man mit den bereits dokumentierten Werten (also denotation=urban) die Situation ausreichend gut beschreiben kann?
Wieso gibst du "kleine Korrektur" als Änderungssatzkommentar an? Findest du nicht, dass soetwas wie "weitere Eigenschaften zu Bäumen hinzugefügt" deutlich besser passen würde, weil mit einer Korrektur hat das ja ehere nichts zu tun?
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-19 15:22:10+00:00): Ciao. Ma dove sarebbe la corsia di emergenza qui? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3559948180776647
ivanbranco (2022-09-18 20:13:52+00:00): Ciao Sara,

benvenuta su OSM! Grazie per la modifica!

C'è un problema però, hai creato un nuovo sentiero sulle strade già esistenti. Dovevi aggiungere i tratti già esistenti alla relazione. Le relazioni non sono semplicissime forse per gli utenti alle prime armi.

In ogni caso iD (l'editor che hai usato) ha provato ad avvisarti con 6 avvisi di way sovrapposte, la prossima volta cerca di capire perché ti segnala quegli avvisi. Se hai bisogno di aiuto ti segnalo che c'è un canale Telegram italiano dedicato a OSM.

Buon mapping!
Sara Lasagni (2022-09-19 07:03:40+00:00): Ciao Ivan, grazie per il commento. Esiste un modo per cancellare la relazione che dovrei aver creato? Pensavo fosse una cosa più semplice e intuitiva
ivanbranco (2022-09-19 15:13:55+00:00): Possiamo cancellarla, ma se è un sentiero esistente (è segnalato sul luogo? ci sono segnavia o altre fonti sulla sua esistenza?) sarebbe meglio sistemarlo piuttosto che cancellarlo.
Sara Lasagni (2022-09-20 14:55:15+00:00): Sì il sentiero esiste fisicamente, ma esisteva anche su OSM, infatti io pensavo di aver preso i tratti di quel sentiero e di averli incollati su una relazione esportabile. Invece da quello che ho capito è come se avessi disegnato un nuovo sentiero (cosa che non volevo fare).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:28:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
ruugie (2022-09-24 14:56:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

You are always giving the same comment "introdução ou actualização de elementos", which is true, but says nothing.
SekeRob (2022-09-15 13:03:23+00:00): Funny, you remove the full stop on name of one part of the cycleway but you leave it on the section before ;O)
damianeue (2022-09-15 17:08:27+00:00): I swear, I checked it but I didn't notice
SekeRob (2022-09-15 17:14:21+00:00): Only goes to show that WYSINWYG.
Niiepce (2022-09-18 16:05:06+00:00): Hallo,
du verwendest hier den Tag restriction=only_right_turn auf Punkten. Dieser Tag ist jedoch für restriction-Relationen gedacht und diese sind tatsächlich an diesen Stellen schon eingetragen. Wenn du nicht weißt, was eine restriction-Relation ist, ist das nicht schlimm. Du solltest nur diesen Tag dann auch nicht verwenden. Wenn du wissen möchtest, was eine restriction-Relation ist kannst du das hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction
Außerdem wollte ich fragen, ob du den Hydrantendeckel (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4974112917/history) mit Absicht entfernt hast oder ob das ein Ausversehen war? Wenn das mit Absicht war, dann schreibe das bitte auch in deinen Änderungssatzkommentar. Grundsätzlich fände ich Änderungssatzkommentare mit mehr als ein, zwei Wörtern wirklich hilfreich, damit man besser versteht, was du gemacht hast.
user_6110846 (2022-09-15 10:01:51+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KAYq90lnd4T7AKZ8ry2JW5BSqIwD2BW6/view
mavl (2022-09-16 14:06:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок заменил для Голышманово тег  
  
addr:district=Голышмановский городской округ  
  
на  
  
addr:district=Голышмановский район

"Голышмановский район", конечно же, существует. Это административно-территориальная единица в Тюменской области. Но в OSM используется муниципальное деление территории. Раньше было муниципальное образование "Голышмановский муниципальный район", но в 2018 году (примерно) оно было преобразовано в "Голышмановский городской округ". Поэтому тег "addr:district=Голышмановский городской округ" правильный. Если он неправильный, то тогда нужно везде менять муниципальное деление на административно-территориальное.  
  
Я взял на себя смелость вернуть прежнее значение этого тега.
MxxCon (2022-09-16 06:19:21+00:00): Hello.
If I'm not mistaken, maxheight tag should be only on the relevant sections where it applies, ie just around the overpass, not a segment going large distance back.
Or is that no longer the standard?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126214186
kirsing (2022-09-16 15:07:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your notice. Yes, you're right. This standard exists.
mcliquid (2022-09-16 10:59:31+00:00): Hi, ist es mittlerweile korrigiert von dir oder nach wie vor Handlungsbedarf?
Ferlan Fliesen und Natursteine GmbH (2022-09-16 14:17:16+00:00): Hallo, nein es wurde zwischenzeitlich korrigiert, vielen Dank.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Niiepce (2022-09-18 16:18:00+00:00): Bitte mache dir die Mühe und suche den richtigen Tag für die Absperrschranken (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dbarrier_board) raus. Die willkürliche Wahl von values macht die Daten nicht mehr brauchbar für jede Art der maschinellen Auswertung (Generierung von Karten, Routenplanung, Statistik,...). Das ist aber wofür die Daten der OSM da sind.
Außerdem lösche bitte nicht einfach Objekte anderer und ersetzte sie durch deine (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik%E2%86%99). Besonders, wenn du dabei wichtige Tags nicht mitübernimmst, ist das Löschen schlecht.
eggie (2022-09-15 11:08:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... maar waarom mag je niet vanuit zuide naar links afbuigen? Welk bord staat hier? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-15 11:25:27+00:00): Dag  Kliriam.. Iets zo oplossen met een afslagbeperking gaat niet werken. Er staan ook geen borden.
Ook geldt zoiets dan ook voor fietsers terwijl je wellicht een auto in gedachten hebt.
De afslagbeperkingen heb ik verwijderd en gewoon een paaltje neergezet. De accesstags zijn default en een auto zal niet routeren. 
Gemotoriseerde tweewielers het ik met ......=yes toegevoegd. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-09-15 11:11:40+00:00): Dit kan prima zo.. Je kunt zelfs verder schuiven .... of het iets uithaalt is een tweede. De afstand tot de westelijke straat is nog altijd korter.
Groet
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
ivanbranco (2022-10-01 10:29:30+00:00): Hi Louis 64,

there a problem with this cliff: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091557461/

the wiki tags link the the town page, not the cliff page. The wiki tags should describe the element.

Also both the wiki tags are using wrong syntax.

wikipedia=Plougastel-Daoulas should be wikipedia=fr:Plougastel-Daoulas 
and 
wikidata=https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plougastel-Daoulas should be wikidata=Q383277

Could you check it out please?
Louis-64 (2023-05-17 21:15:14+00:00): ok, je ne vois ton message que maintenant; le problème est résolu.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:12:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
user_6110846 (2022-09-15 10:02:04+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KAYq90lnd4T7AKZ8ry2JW5BSqIwD2BW6/view
Msiipola (2022-10-02 16:06:34+00:00): Jag har återställt tidigare vägar, då den här uppladdningen flyttade vägar till helt fel positioner.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:37:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Msiipola (2022-09-21 07:10:40+00:00): Hej! Här har fel uppstått. Hjortronvägen, korsande service-väg och Odonvägen är alla flyttade till felaktig position.
I uppladdningskommetar står att Bing har använts. Det är ok, men då måste bakgrundsbilden positionskorrigeras. Vilket inte vekar har gjorts, eller något annat fel har uppstått.
Jag låter felen vara kvar, så att du själv kan rätta till det.
Msiipola (2022-10-02 16:08:58+00:00): Du har inte svart på mitt tidigare meddelanden. Vilket inte är ok.
Jag har därför återställt/raderat den här uppladdningen av dig.
abakus_uploader (2022-09-15 22:32:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
highflyer74 (2022-09-15 19:12:57+00:00): Moin!

So ganz richtig ist das noch nicht... Aber ich hab's entsprechend angepasst.

Viele Grüße!
ivanbranco (2022-09-18 20:08:53+00:00): Ciao Matthew, benvenuto su OSM! Grazie per la modifica :D

Solo un appunto, su OSM in Italia per convenzione mettiamo i civici senza separatori e con l'esponente minuscolo, quindi in questo caso 19a invece di 19/A.

Buon mapping!
MatthewHorse (2022-09-18 20:13:38+00:00): Ciao Ivan, grazie mille! si sono nuovo e ti ringrazio molto per il suggerimento. Puoi rimodificarlo tu per me ? :-) grazie
ivanbranco (2022-09-19 09:37:47+00:00): Fatto! 

Se sei interessato sappi che c'è anche un gruppo Telegram italiano dove poter chiedere consigli ecc.: https://telegram.me/OpenStreetMapItalia
MarbleRock (2022-09-16 11:01:32+00:00): Pa to nije bio jedan vrt nego više vrtova! Ako smatraš da je krivo zašto ne možeš podijeliti poligon na više njih nego odmah brišeš?
Janjko (2022-09-17 19:07:03+00:00): Imaš pravo, nakon brisanja bi trebalo mapirati na bolji način.

Već sam te pokušao kontaktirati mnogo puta, ali mi nikada nisi odgovarao. Jako si aktivan maper, pa bi bilo sjajno kada bi nam se pridružio na Telegram kanalu @osmhr

https://web.telegram.org/k/#@osmhr

Ako ne, onda bih te molio da se kreneš javljati na poruke koje si šaljemo preko OSM-a, jer ćemo tako biti puno efikasniji u mapiranju.

Hvala, i oprosti na brisanju!

Janko
eggie (2022-09-15 12:12:46+00:00): Beste Caseman   Dat is de functie.. dus niet name= gebruiken.. 
Good practice    

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice 

Gebruik geen tag name om een kenmerk te beschrijven !

De tag name is bestemd voor de naam van een kenmerk. Het dient niet gebruikt te worden als beschrijving of classificatie van een kenmerk. Daar zijn andere tags voor bestemd. Bijvoorbeeld; het is fout om een tag te gebruiken met name=track voor een track door het bos. In plaats daarvan moet die een tag hebben: highway=track. Als de track een naam heeft, bijvoorbeeld "Lohrpad", dan krijgt het een extra tag name, name=Lorhpad. Heeft het kenmerk geen naam, dan ook geen tag name'.

Een geschikte tag vinden kan vaak door gebruik te maken van de voorkeuren in de bewerkingssoftware, bij JOSM toets F3. Vindt je geen geschikte tag kijk dan op Kaarteigenschappen Kaarteigenschappen, of vraag het de gemeenschap. Als er geen passende oplossing wordt gevonden, plaats den een; "note= * " of een "description= * ". 

Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-09-15 11:34:57+00:00): Het is even een weetje..., maar dit soort accesstags zijn default op een highway=track Je hoeft dan niet foot=yes toe te voegen.

MVG
eggie
ovruni (2022-09-16 07:39:45+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han cambiado fronteras que involucran a varios distritos, las cuales contienen geometrías en base a las fuentes del gobierno, como son los ministerios MINAM, MINEN, MTC, etc. Estos puede verse por ejemplo en el visor del MTC https://portal.mtc.gob.pe/emergencia_vial/emergenciavial.html 
Por otra parte, los cambios de fronteras deben de ser discutidas previamente con la comunidad, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios. Para cualquier consulta sobre el mapeo en Perú existe el telegram https://t.me/osmpe y la lista de correos https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
gscholz (2022-09-17 06:04:09+00:00): HI,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=12.19742&lat=10.62842&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126216984

I have reverted it to fix those issues. I am wondering about how this could happen as you are using JOSM. May be you like to educate yourself about its internal validator:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

Kind regards
Guido
Tangy_Joy (2022-09-19 14:32:42+00:00): Hi gscholz, thanks for reaching out. This residential polygon got selected and aligned accidentally while I was orthogonizing the building polygon, and the change went by unnoticed because I was working on a lower zoom level. I missed the validation error pointing out the self-intersecting lines. Glad that you reverted the changeset to avoid further problems. I will be cautious when uploading changesets in the future.
gscholz (2022-09-20 05:38:40+00:00): Hi Tangy_Joy,
thanks for your response.
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Frans S (2022-09-15 15:00:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126217070
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert