piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Marek-M (2020-05-09 12:43:33+00:00): Cześć, byłem, zobaczyłem, ścieżki są oznaczone znakami poziomymi, co prawda miejscami są mocno powycierane ale są widoczne. Na jakiej podstawie zatem Ty likwidujesz ścieżki, które istnieją, to nie mam pojęcia. Przestań zatem uporczywie wprowadzać błędne dane. Pozdrawiam i powodzenia.
esbi (2020-05-11 22:36:52+00:00): Wiesz jak powinna być oznakowana ścieżka rowerowa?
To są takie znaki pionowe, niebieskie, z rowerem. No ale dyletant tego nie wie.
Marek-M (2020-06-15 14:03:22+00:00): Ok, w pełni poprawne oznakowanie byłoby w tej sytuacji bardzo przydatne. Jednak rozdzielone ścieżki piesza i rowerowa w tym miejscu przez każdego są raczej jednoznacznie traktowane przez użytkowników dróg i nie każdy zwraca uwagę na to, czy znak pionowy był na początku ścieżki czy nie. Chyba w takiej sytuacji brak znaków pionowych nie powinien eliminować tej ścieżki z mapy OSM. Dodatkowo o wybrakowane oznaczenie zapytałem w UM Gdańsk i poniżej przytaczam odpowiedź urzędników: 

'w odpowiedzi na zgłoszenie informujemy, że po przedmiotowych drogach rowerowe są oznakowanie piktogramem P-23 "Rower", co oznacza, że po przedmiotowych wydzielonych drogach rowerowych mogą poruszać się rowerzyści. Jednocześnie informujemy, że nie planuje się ustawienia oznakowania pionowego.'
Mashin (2020-05-03 15:38:31+00:00): There is a better imagery for this purpose. In iD go to background settings (or press B) and select "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta". Just keep in mind that these images are few years outdated.
richter_fn (2020-05-11 08:40:39+00:00): Reverted: https://osm.org/changeset/85010771
richter_fn (2020-05-11 08:58:11+00:00): Related: https://osm.org/changeset/56838599 https://osm.org/changeset/84540600
Olla_Ko (2020-05-08 15:21:03+00:00): Hi! I think that WAY: 799235643 should be closed polygon or part of relation to have landuse=residential tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84539478
Olla_Ko (2020-05-08 15:36:54+00:00): Hi! could you please provide more details what is the reason of removing Feldman's neighbourhood name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84539840
richter_fn (2020-05-11 08:40:08+00:00): Reverted: https://osm.org/changeset/85010771
richter_fn (2020-05-11 08:57:50+00:00): Related: https://osm.org/changeset/56838599 https://osm.org/changeset/84540600
richter_fn (2020-05-11 08:39:46+00:00): Reverted: https://osm.org/changeset/85010771
richter_fn (2020-05-11 08:57:21+00:00): Related: https://osm.org/changeset/56838599 https://osm.org/changeset/84540600
tyndale (2020-06-13 12:28:58+00:00): If possible please https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=84540450
richter_fn (2020-05-07 21:30:22+00:00): Что случилось с тропинками около остановки Сосновый бор? Ещё осенью я там ходил, неужели за время самоизоляции природа настолько очистилась, что они успели зарасти?
Зачем было удалять здоровенные куски экотропы на Пролетарке?
Куда исчезли все тропинки с комплекса и как теперь бедным студентам гулять там по лесу?
save2desk (2020-05-08 05:14:11+00:00): Подтверждаю удаление множества существующих троп.
richter_fn (2020-05-11 08:31:36+00:00): Reverted: https://osm.org/changeset/85010219
SuperSasha (2020-05-11 17:11:37+00:00): Подтверждаю массовое удаление троп и грунтовых дорог в Студгородке. Лыжероллерную трассу актуализатор удалил.
richter_fn (2020-05-11 08:31:19+00:00): Reverted along with 84540600:
https://osm.org/changeset/85010219
Ars-UA (2020-05-03 07:18:12+00:00): В дождливую погоду пересыхающие ручьи снова появляются. Там специально было отмечено "intermittent=yes".
TheLightTwist (2020-05-03 16:15:48+00:00): Я был там в дождливую погоду, у этого ручья исток в этом месте уже давно исчез. На месте его протекания сейчас спокойно можно ездить на авто, даже вымытого углубления не осталось
chachafish (2020-05-04 03:14:20+00:00): Howdy, welcome to openstreetmap and thank you for your additions. FYI, the minimum requirements for addresses are a street number and a street name. Can you go back and correct the address fields you've edited? Thank you very much :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr#If_the_address_applies_to_an_area_.28e.g._often_detached_houses.2C_terraced_house.2C_buildings_including_or_without_associated_open_areas.29
ririri (Nagaoka) (2020-05-03 12:41:56+00:00): 「以西」は「以東」の間違いでした。
Jack the Ripper (2021-02-17 00:09:50+00:00): Dude, you're dum.  D-U-M dum.  You left off the speed limit units!
Jack the Ripper (2021-02-17 00:10:04+00:00): Who are you calling dum, idiot?
Jack the Ripper (2021-02-17 00:10:18+00:00): Oh yeah?  Who are you calling idiot, moron?
Jack the Ripper (2021-02-17 00:10:33+00:00): WHAT???  Who are you calling moron, imbecile?????
iandees (2021-02-17 00:30:43+00:00): 🤔
Jack the Ripper (2021-02-17 01:45:27+00:00): Hi,  Ian. Did you have a question about this changeset?
kapazao (2020-05-03 09:22:51+00:00): Hi, what is the local name of this pub?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84542518
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-05-05 02:03:21+00:00): Viva Ricardo,

O nome do trilho certamente não é este. agradeço que corrijas. Se quiseres adicionar a dificuldade do trilho, podes utilizar a sac scale conforme estipulado em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale
radyricardo (2020-05-05 11:14:04+00:00): É sempre bom aprender, mas como vi noutros trilhos esta "designação" usei a mesma. lógico que faltam ai muitos trilhos terem a sua "dificuldade".
Muito Obrigado pela dica.
Já deu para aprender.
Tenho outros trilhos para adicionar na zona que menos dificuldade, mas decalcar um gpx demora bastante tempo e cuidado.
Entretanto descobri um nome de um trilho que já está marcado aqui no OSM mas tenho de lá ir ver se realmente está acessível é de dificuldade bastante alta.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-05-05 11:16:10+00:00): Sem problemas. Se te quiseres juntar a nós no Telegram podes fazê-lo em OSMPortugal
Comunidade OpenStreetMap em Portugal
https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Ensina-mos a acelarares o processo de vectorizacao do gpx.

Obrigado pelas contribuições
Glassman (2020-05-06 19:12:18+00:00): Tip - add the name of the dog off leash area to the polygon instead of as a point.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84542611
aharvey (2020-05-03 03:21:35+00:00): Since cycleway=doorzone is has not really been discussed or gone through a proposal process, I feel we should still use cycleway=lane so data consumers can still make use of this. cycleway:lane=doorzone has been used in Australia to mark cyclelanes which are in a doorzone but now this conflicts with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:lane so we need a new tag, but to replace cycleway=lane with cycleway=doorzone I think needs to be discussed.
samuelrussell (2020-05-03 13:16:39+00:00): 0.70 m lanes entirely within the hazardous extension of a normally parked car door isn't actually consumeable data via cycleway=lane.  cycleway=no may be a more realistic consumeable data.  Sending someone down Edgecliff Road with the belief they'll have a bit of paint they can 'safely' ride behind is somewhat dubious when it gets as narrow as 0.50 m entirely within door swing.

I'd eagerly like to know what best practice ought to be.  A certain data consumer should probably mark this grade of infra in brown.
aharvey (2020-05-03 13:33:51+00:00): cycleway=lane only needs to have a marked (painted) separation from vehicles, whether that bicycle lane is in a door zone or not is irrelevant to if it's a cycle lane or not per the OSM definition. ie. being in a door zone does not all of a sudden mean it's not a bicycle lane.

The tagging list discussion on how best to tag a door zone is at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-May/052328.html and my preference from that discussion is cycleway:lane:doorzone=yes. I'm working to put this through a formal proposal process so it can be an approved tag, then data consumers can look for this tag. In the meantime this should still be counted as a bicycle lane.
samuelrussell (2020-05-04 08:33:45+00:00): Thank you for your advice; Given the specificity of the hazard with the way type or way subtype I concurr with your c:l:d=yes/no/alt schema.  I will manually undo my actions within the week.  Chur!
samuelrussell (2020-05-04 08:34:30+00:00): I note that most australian doorzones would be :buffered=-1.5
BPTT (2024-12-04 19:36:11+00:00): Hi there. Please use the feature type Golf Cartpath in the future for ways like these, or the tags golf=cartpath and golf_cart=yes. Thanks!
skquinn (2020-07-27 21:04:45+00:00): Please do not tag shop=yes without any additional information. If you have a specific shop=*, amenity=*, office=*, etc tag without a name or other information that's another thing, but shop=yes with no other tags is  not useful. We need at least a name or an address to have hope of completing the data.
user_5359 (2020-05-03 04:16:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved an address node over 100 meters and and you put him in the middle of the street. Please check the correctness. 
if you need help with repairs, you are welcome to contact us!
Mashin (2020-05-03 15:29:15+00:00): Just to bring to attention, there is a scheme from mapping marked hiking tails as relations: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Long_distance_trails
user_10241830 (2020-05-07 07:13:32+00:00): Hallo,

nur als Hinweis (ich hab die Änderungen jetzt nicht inhaltlich geprüft): die Kleinbuchstaben in Hausnummern sollten Kleinbuchstaben bleiben und nicht einfach in Großbuchstaben geändert werden.

Ich werde es einmalig für diese Änderung zurücksetzen, bitte aber darum, in Zukunft darauf zu achten.
FABN62 (2020-05-07 13:39:20+00:00): Hallo,
vielen Dank für die Info. 
Ich hatte es aus Gewohnheit so umgesetzt, da im offiziellen Geschäftsverkehr Zusätze zu Hausnummern immer abgesetzt und großgeschrieben werden. 
Wenn hier allerdings das System kleine Buchstaben direkt an den Nummern vorsieht, sollte das natürlich einheitlich gehalten werden. 
Ich überprüfe meine Änderungen alle nochmals und werde das abändern ;-)
Glassman (2020-05-03 05:44:30+00:00): It looks like you accidently dragged nodes when moving the road that goes past the small pond. I went ahead and fixed it. I also changed it to a track. There is houses or businesses near by.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84544629
danieldegroot2 (2021-09-21 10:33:22+00:00): Hey BeKri,

Keep changeset discussion seperate, please; see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55734638

Regards,

Daniel

-
Removed discussion from fixme in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111488499
Viking Link (2021-05-12 09:09:41+00:00): Why have you deleted your own ways? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=84545485
bagonzars (2020-05-03 10:41:38+00:00): Thanks
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84545794
bagonzars (2020-05-03 10:46:40+00:00): Kindly Try to modify items rather than deleting
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84545925
abrensch (2020-05-14 11:50:14+00:00): Hallo nafl,

dieser Kreisel hier hat durch Deine Änderung sein "highway" tag verloren und ist somit quasi gelöscht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227975249

Schaust Du das mal an?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
nafl (2020-05-14 12:04:20+00:00): ist erledigt :)
ftcat (2020-05-03 06:13:26+00:00): Hi tytoalba••,

I notice you have tagged the woodland with leaf-cycle as evergreen, this is not correct, the correct tag would be deciduous as most trees in Zambia will lose their leaves towards the end of the dry season, a notable exception is the Winter Thorn (Faidherbia albida) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faidherbia.

As most satellite imagery of Zambia is taken during the dry season much of the woodland looks like scrub as the trees have lost or are losing their leaf canopy also owing to the very large bush fires that occur in the dry season the leaf canopy will be burnt off by the fires, this can be seen in some imagery and is the reason for the cut lines around the camp sites in Liuwa, to protect them. The fires are also the reason for the black appearance of many of the grasslands.
Andreas Binder (2020-05-03 06:13:53+00:00): Why did you removed the boat:*-Tags. According https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:boat:type the tagging was correct. Now after your improvement canoe rental is missing and clothes=boat and boat=canoe;kayak without a wikidefinition is used.
Adamant1 (2020-05-03 06:28:44+00:00): Hello. Of course the article for boat:type would say boat:type is the key to use. That's it's purpose. It was created by someone who thinks namespaces should be used everywhere. Even in cases where there is a more accepted tag. Which he intentionally leaves out of articles. Simply put, boat is a more accepted tag for this. See the actual shop=boat article which mentions it and the article for amenity=boat_rental that also lists more used alternatives that would still be better then boat:type. 

Also, there are many discussions on the wiki and other places about how "type" tags are better avoided when they can be. Which is the general consensus of most of the community. 

Ultimately, its listed on the shop=boat article, it says somewhere else in the wiki that boat is the preferred tag for tagging boat type, community consensus is generally against type tags when they can be avoided, and I rather not argue about it. So, there isn't really much else to say about it IMO.
Adamant1 (2020-05-03 06:30:46+00:00): Also, the person who created the boat:type article is a known fraud that has been blocked both on here and the wiki multiple times and intentionally suggests bad tags with better alternatives that are actually accepted by the community. So, there's zero reason to go with boat:type IMO.
Adamant1 (2020-05-03 06:45:19+00:00): Btw, it's pretty well known in OSM and mostly agreed on that the intent of OSM isn't be a place to store "inventory" type information like this anyway. Since it's not really geographical information or even about a geographical feature. So, at least the information is still being provided instead of just getting deleted whatever tag it is.
Andreas Binder (2020-05-03 16:30:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dboat also the boat:*-Tags and boat=* was added by yourself last month. boat=* is an access tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:boat).

Would you be so kind to recreate the canoe rental tag, which was deleted by your changeset?
Adamant1 (2020-05-03 16:52:49+00:00): After a discussion where other people said it was an existing usage. Otherwise, I wouldn't have put it in the article. I dont apreciate being like I'm being dishonest about it either. I got better things to do then deal with paranoid crap. Ultimately I could care less which tag is used. Except I go with what was discussed and is established. Not the tag some huxter pushes on everyone. You can put the rental tag back if you want or I will when I feel like it. I dont care either way. The worlds not going to end if its not immediately dealt with though. Boat:rental or whatever it was isnt supported anywhere anyway as far as I know. That said, I  actually didnt notice I had removed it. So I likely will put it back at some point. I dont like valid tags being deleted any more then the next guy.
Andreas Binder (2020-05-03 17:01:34+00:00): No, boat=* is used as an acess tag => see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/boat Please restore the canoe rental (you can see it in the object history, that your removed the tag).
Adamant1 (2020-05-03 17:07:41+00:00): And its also used for tagging the type of boat dude. Get the hell over it. I'm not making it up. Im not doing crap for you at this point when your accusing me of lying. I have a normal life outside of this that I'm currently attending yo and I'm not going to jump just brcause you say so anyway. So go boss someone else around. I'll fix the tag when I have the time and feel like it or if you cant wait do it yourself. Outside of that, I'm done with the conversation.
Andreas Binder (2020-05-03 17:49:57+00:00): I am not accusing you of lying. I said hat boat=* is used as an access tag (according taginfo 98.92% are "yes" or "no" values) and I said that you deleted the canoe rental for this poi. I hope you fix the canoe rental and rethink the use of boat=* as an replacement for boat:type.
Adamant1 (2020-05-03 17:59:16+00:00): Service is used for multiple things also. Tags work that way sometimes. There was a mass edit of boat POIs a while back by the aformentioned huxter that switched all the tags over to namespaces like boat:type. Which could by why the boat tags are low for this now. Either way, its not like boat:type has any community acceptance anyway and like I said type tags are generally looked doen on. Do, I dont see what the difference is. Im not "replacing" boat:type because it wasnt an accepted tag in the first place and only has any use because of un-discussed mass edit and edit war. Whatever the case, its mostly just personal prefrence. Mine is toward boat, yours isnt, but at least mine is based on something.That's all I feel like saying. I'll fix the rental when Im at a computer next.
Andreas Binder (2020-05-03 18:12:44+00:00): "Im not "replacing" boat:type because it wasnt an accepted tag in the first place and only has any use because of un-discussed mass edit and edit war."

This poi was until yesterday never changed by a mass edit or edit war in the past (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6699213992/history).
Adamant1 (2020-05-04 02:04:00+00:00): I was talking about more generally. In 10 years boat:type has only had like 50 uses, whatever it might be locally, and more then half where do to a single edit in 2017 that switched whatever tag it was before to boat:type. Personally, I could care less about this particular instance, but it is better to go with a more widely accepted tag. Tags change over time. That's life. However long it's been tagged as boat:type isn't really relevant.

Also, it's wrong to characterize this as a mass edit or edit war, because it is neither. I told you accidentally removed the rental:boat tag and that I would fix it when I had the time and I also said I didn't care if you changed the boat tag back to boat:type if that's how you prefer it. So in no way am I edit warring and don't appreciate things this characterized that way. I'm being more then reasonable here. Whereas, your clearly not.
Adamant1 (2020-05-04 02:09:10+00:00): I added back rental in the form of kayak_rental and canoe_rental since they have like 8 times more use then rental:boat and are clearly preferred. If you think it should be different, then feel free to change it. I'm done here though.
Adamant1 (2020-05-04 02:10:36+00:00): Same goes for boat versus boat:type
Andreas Binder (2020-05-04 18:52:41+00:00): Thank you for recreating the canoe rental! I startet https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tag:shop=boat#Please_do_not_use_boat.3D.2A_to_show_what_you_can_buy so we can talk about your recently added boat=* for the shop=boat-Wiki. I hope you participate and perhaps we can find a better tag.
Adamant1 (2020-05-04 19:25:08+00:00): Yep. I noticed. I dont feel the need to have yet another conservation about it. Since as I've told you about a hundred times now it was already discussed somewhere. I'm not really into re-legitating things every five minutes or going through a long protracted multiday discussion that I've already been through before. Especially for a tag with extremely low usage, that I dont really care how is tagged. What ever is said on the wiki will just be a recomendation anyway, and I already said to use whatever tag you feel like. So its even less pointless. That said, of you feel like discussing it, fine. There's nothing wrong with more opinions. Even if they are going to repeat exactly what I already said. If I happen to find the other conversation I'll post a link to it at least, but other then that I'm good with this for now.
Andreas Binder (2020-05-04 19:39:53+00:00): Yes, please send me a link to other conversation about using boat=* for shop=boat. This would be very nice! Talking on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tag:shop=boat#Please_do_not_use_boat.3D.2A_to_show_what_you_can_buy would have the advantage for you that its visible for everyone and not only for me in this changeset und you need not to tell the same story multiple times to different mappers.
azakh-world (2020-05-04 01:41:12+00:00): Hello.
Please, when editing railway stations, could you keep stop_area relations in order like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8000184? You've created platforms and removed stop_positions. In such cases, please add platforms also to stop_area relation to connect them with the "railway=station" object (subway_entrances are also desirable members of the corresponding stop_area).
The subway validator http://osm-subway.maps.me/philippines.html helps to detect such errors.

Best regards,
Alexey
Glassman (2020-05-06 19:09:58+00:00): If you are looking for GIS work, you may want to improve the park boundary, otherwise if a prospective employer were to look at your edit, it may not result in a job offer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84547708
ChehrehBargi (2020-12-03 03:34:26+00:00): با سلام
دوربرگردان برای محلهایی که به وسیله مانع هشداری پلاستیکی یا جدول جدا شده‌اند استفاده می‌شوند. در تقاطع بهشت فاطمه با میدان صنایع دستی نیز دور برگردان وجود ندارد.
با تشکر از تلاشهای شما برای بهسازی نقشه.
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 15:25:17+00:00): Владимир сто первый раз прошу сделай правки свои компактнее, что бы они пол мира не накрывали разом. Можно же хоть чуть участников уважать, что бы можно было посмотреть изменения, твои. а не пол мира за раз.
iWowik (2020-05-21 04:58:05+00:00): К сожалению, это технологически неудобно
Constable (2020-05-03 09:16:30+00:00): Hi Adam, shouldn't we just add amenity=ski_rental to the shop=rental node inead of completely removing shop tag?
Wiki page seems a bit confusing to me though https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dski_rental
Thanks
Adamant1 (2020-05-03 09:22:26+00:00): Hey there. Hhhmm, I don't know. It looks like from their Facebook page that all they do is rental. If that is the case it would be wrong to tag them as a shop IMO, but then down at the bottom of their sign they do use the word "shop." So it's a tough call. 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/category/Outdoor---Sporting-Goods-Company/Gianni-ski-service-1572088166391037/
Constable (2020-05-03 09:38:56+00:00): I'll go check that out the first time I'll be in Livigno.
Agree with you and with the idea that a rental might be actually something different from a shop (so no shop tag needed), as amenity=car_rental, but at the same time we have the shop=rental tag, which confuses me a bit, as it should be used to point out shops focusing solely on rental, which means some kind of rentals do fall under the shop tag.... hmmm