piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:11:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
andi9876 (2022-10-22 01:42:36+00:00): Hello, please stop add artworks and remove this, remember its visible for everybody. Private favorites you can add in an app. Thank you!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
andi9876 (2022-10-22 01:42:23+00:00): Hello, please stop add artworks and remove this, remember its visible for everybody. Private favorites you can add in an app. Thank you!
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 13:59:11+00:00): your mapping is good
please keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127701549
andi9876 (2022-10-22 01:41:44+00:00): Hello, please stop add artworks and remove this, remember its visible for everybody. Private favorites you can add in an app. Thank you!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
PT-53 (2022-10-18 12:52:36+00:00): Hallo fx99,
ich verstehe Deinen CS-Kommentar "Add residential buildings" nicht. 
Welche Gebäude hast Du ergänzt?
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-10-18 13:21:06+00:00): Hallo fx99, 
Du gibst als Quelle für Deinen Eintrag des Neubaugebietes "Maps4BW (LGL-BW, www.lgl-bw.de); Bing; Maxar Premium Imagery" an. Ich kann da aber nirgends ein Neubaugebiet sehen. Auch stimmt die Fläche Deines Neubaugebietes nicht mit dem Bebbauungsplan überein.

Wenn Du Neubaugebiete einzeichnest richte Dich doch nach den amtlichen Bebauungsplänen.

Grüße
fx99 (2022-10-18 18:12:20+00:00): zu Kommentar 1:
das ist der Standard der Challenge.
fx99 (2022-10-18 18:14:46+00:00): zu Kommentar 2:
Nachdem auf den Luftbildern keine Gebäude zu erkennen sind, aber Straßen eingezeichnet sind und das Gebiet als residential in OSM war, kann es doch nur ein Neubaugebiet sein.
Wenn Du Zugang zu den Bebauungsplänen hast, bitte anpassen.
Glassman (2022-10-21 21:59:39+00:00): #TIP: Square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127703331
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-19 19:24:41+00:00): Hey Lav_SN,

Check this object again, please.
You seem to have made the right decision in editing this object.
However, you have not removed the node, but you have moved it or used the square operation without checking the outcome. As such, you have created a redundant node in the building geometry.

Your edits:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127703513

Regards,

Daniel
Lav_SN (2022-10-20 13:54:06+00:00): Hi danieldegroot2, 
We would have lost the history of previous mappers by removing the node. To avoid that loss, I had opted to realign it. But your point makes sense to me and as a result, I have removed the node in question. Thank you for your feedback!

Regards
Lav_SN
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-20 16:17:59+00:00): "Keep the history" usually refers to the object as a whole.
- If you change something to an object, it can be retrieved easily as can be seen above.
- If you were to remove the whole building and create a new one, the old object's history would not be displayed in the new object's history.
- In that case, I can only retrieve the old object's history by looking at your changeset. I'd have to be aware of your changeset in the first place.
Lav_SN (2022-10-21 05:34:13+00:00): Duly noted. Thanks, danieldegroot2

Regards,
Lav_SN
eggie (2022-10-18 07:04:25+00:00): Dag Edd.. Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke.
oneway=no heb ik verwijderd.
Dat hoef je niet toe te voegen aan reguliere wegen.
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-16 11:22:14+00:00): note: you added some image tags linking to image from StreetComplete notes (for example in this changeset)

Sadly this images are not permanent and are scheduled to be deleted shortly after note is closed, and were never intended for long-term archiving.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#Are_the_pictures_taken_with_StreetComplete_permanent%3F for details.

You can use http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nOD to find remaining links in image tag, including what you added to OSM objects.

If you want to do something with them some may be still retrievable.

All such links are scheduled for removal (broken ones were already removed)
user4816003805 (2022-11-16 19:56:08+00:00): Hi Mateusz,

Thanks for letting me know!

I've removed the image tags I added in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129008761
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129008788

I'm actually relieved to find out that StreetComplete images aren't permanent.  I felt guilty adding pictures to notes since they might be wasting disk space.

I'll be sure to save future images and either host them myself or through Wikimedia Commons or Mapillary.

Thanks again!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-19 19:23:12+00:00): Hey Mo_Nem,

Check this object again, please.
You seem to have made the right decision in editing this object.
However, you have not removed the node, but you have moved it or used the square operation without checking the outcome. As such, you have created a redundant node in the building geometry.

Your edits:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127704551

Regards,

Daniel
Mo_Nem (2022-10-20 13:54:58+00:00): Hello danieldegroot2, 
I tried to avoid losing previous mapper history by adjusting the existing node instead of removing it. I agree with your point though. I have removed the redundant node, and I appreciate your input.

Regards
Mo_Nem
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-20 16:18:58+00:00): "Keep the history" usually refers to the object as a whole.
- If you change something to an object, it can be retrieved easily as can be seen above.
- If you were to remove the whole building and create a new one, the old object's history would not be displayed in the new object's history.
- In that case, I can only retrieve the old object's history by looking at your changeset. I'd have to be aware of your changeset in the first place.
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 13:54:15+00:00): The mapping is quite good, please keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127704610
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 13:54:16+00:00): The mapping is quite good, please keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127704610
map per (2022-10-20 19:55:51+00:00): Sivventus war schon eingezeichnet, duplikat gelöscht
heilbron (2025-08-17 12:41:42+00:00): Ok, danke!
TBKMrt (2022-10-24 16:26:24+00:00): @SFenninger1: Ist da was schief gegenagen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9121582589
Der Hacken schaut irgendwie nicht normal aus.
Larmax (2022-12-26 16:18:23+00:00): Hi, why did you remove that building:part?
Friendly_Ghost (2022-10-18 09:47:41+00:00): I reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127716227 because the Ukrainian OSM community urges us not to edit the map of Ukraine during the war there (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war).
marbledrop (2023-03-02 12:43:23+00:00): Actually most of the deleted driveways exist right now.
This changeset should be reverted!
marbledrop (2023-03-02 12:46:39+00:00): The street has been deleted but still exists.
I reverted the change.
Kovoschiz (2022-10-18 08:05:08+00:00): 1. You are not allowed to decide  directly from Wikipedia. This is copyright infringement
2. It has been marked with `{{Unreferenced}}`
3. They haven't clearly distinguish whether this is an actually used English name, or only Cantonese phonetics.
Kovoschiz (2022-10-18 08:07:50+00:00): 4. Someone even suggested it should be "Luk Ngau Peak". This shows there is no commonly used variation.
RaphaelPasloin (2022-12-25 02:56:38+00:00): Hello,

You added a stream in the existing river and going in the opposite direction can you check please and correct this. Thanks.
Adhil@123 (2022-10-18 10:57:55+00:00): if possible,try to connect it with near by stream
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127707562
Adhil@123 (2022-10-18 10:55:03+00:00): make it as single one by pressing shift key and select both then press c
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127707712
Adhil@123 (2022-10-18 10:52:20+00:00): please make a connected network of stream
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127707724
Adhil@123 (2022-10-18 10:49:06+00:00): please add a tunnel or bridge
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127708111
trial (2024-02-01 12:26:45+00:00): Bonjour, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1104881786 : ce coin ne semble pas corrrespondre aux photos aériennes (ni à l'usage : ce ne semble plus être un parking mais une aire de gens du voyage ou un camping). Je me trompe ?
Julien Thébaud (2024-02-01 14:27:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Ce secteur a effectivement été modifié ces dernières années. A l'ouest des talus, l'ancien parking a été replanté avec des arbres (qui sont encore petits). 
A l'est, coté route, ça reste un parking pour le parc expo, ouvert en cas de grosses manifestations. Mais la zone est aussi utilisée pour l'accueil des gens du voyage en été.
trial (2024-02-01 20:48:15+00:00): Merci pour ces précisions, donc il faudrait indiquer que c'est un terrain pour gens du voyage seasonal=summer ou quelque chose du genre. Aec l'ortho j'ai plus l'impression qu'ils sont rasé les talus (ou ce sont de simples tas de glaise).
trial (2024-02-01 21:11:43+00:00): Sinon un vrai talus c'est plutôt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:hedge%3Dhedge_bank
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-19 19:17:21+00:00): Hey KRIYA_Z,

Check this object again, please. Validate your edits with other imagery layers.
This building should be rectangular.

- The sharp angle you removed was caused by a node which was added by a different user than the one who created the building.
- On Esri Clarity, the roof has shadow falling on it from a nearby tree, however the ridges in the corners of the hipped roof are clearly visible. If you used a different imagery layers, you'd have seen that
- On Esri and Bing, the whole roof is visible and it is clearly rectangular. Maxar Premium is too blurry to see what shape it has.
- Also, you have not removed the node, but you have moved it or used the square operation without checking the outcome. As such, you have created a redundant node in the building geometry.

Your edits:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127709461

Regards,

Daniel
KRIYA_Z (2022-10-20 13:52:37+00:00): Hi danieldegroot2, 
Thank you for the input. Adjusted the building as per your suggestion.

Regards
KRIYA_Z
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-20 16:21:13+00:00): Your fellow TomTom editors indicated they did not remove the nodes they touched, in order to keep other contributor's history. Therefore I'll repeat my reply to them here.

"Keep the history" usually refers to the object as a whole.
- If you change something to an object, it can be retrieved easily as can be seen above.
- If you were to remove the whole building and create a new one, the old object's history would not be displayed in the new object's history.
- In that case, I can only retrieve the old object's history by looking at your changeset. I'd have to be aware of your changeset in the first place.
adiatmad (2022-10-20 05:20:28+00:00): Good day, Mas Brahar Habibi! Your edits look great on this changeset. But I notice some of the buildings are unsquared, for example (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1104884035). Allow me to suggest you press Q to square buildings. Happy mapping!
braharhabibi (2022-10-21 18:48:10+00:00): so many thanks for any input. It gives me a lesson.
Adhil@123 (2022-10-18 10:40:41+00:00): please add a bridge or tunnel if stream passing through road
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127709686
Friendly_Ghost (2022-10-18 09:40:57+00:00): I reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127715939 because the Ukrainian OSM community urges us not to edit the map of Ukraine during the war there (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war).
eggie (2022-10-18 08:24:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

De verwijderde naam was kennelijk de projectnaam...  Wanneer het hier is opgeleverd kan die landuse=construction gewoon weg.
Het gebouw zelf  wordt dan building=apartments ipv building=construction
De regel construction=apartments kan verwijderd worden. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Frank Openstreetmap (2022-10-18 19:09:06+00:00): Nee, het is niet de projectnaam. Het een naam die korte tijd gebruikt is om de resterende appartementen te verkopen. Maar goed, ik zal na de laatste opleveringen de landuse/building aanpassen.
eggie (2022-10-18 19:21:43+00:00): Top!
pihentagy (2022-10-18 08:07:34+00:00): FIXME valaki tudná korrigálni az épület méretét?
SomeoneElse (2022-10-18 18:53:31+00:00): Actually, all of the stretch of road around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452474053 is legally walkable (pretty much all trunk roads in the UK are), not just the bit where the LDP uses it.  From memory, all or most of that section has a fairly wide verge too, so it's not even unpleasant to do so.  I'm guessing you've added these tags to prevent comedy routing such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=53.9929%2C-0.9100%3B53.9911%2C-0.9160#map=13/53.9972/-0.9122 :) ?
spiregrain (2022-10-19 07:46:21+00:00): I do hate comedy routing like that.  This changeset (now I look at it, covering too large a geographic area) was prompted by the osmose QA tool, which reports on ways that are part of hiking or cycling route relations.   If a way doesn't have matching foot or bicycle tags; that's reported a an error.  w452474053 is such a way.   I'll see what I can see on the aerial images re:verges and walkability, and update later).
habi (2022-10-24 13:11:34+00:00): You've messed something up here, with adding the ``no_parking` is a value for key `parking:condition:both=no_parking` tags to the Viao Giovanni Coccaccio :)

I'm here because of http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
aa30mom (2022-10-24 13:43:12+00:00): Sorry I have put the comment in the key field. I have corrected it.
You are doing a nice work with your check of new keys!!
habi (2022-10-24 15:10:52+00:00): 🤓 ;)
Adhil@123 (2022-10-18 10:34:54+00:00): please connect the stream with nearby river...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127711126
troglobiont (2022-10-18 10:47:54+00:00): Hallo karlrt,
ich habe die Routen-Tages von den einzelnen Wegsegmenten entfernt und die Wegsegmente in eine neue Fußweg-Relation gepackt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14707598

Du kannst die weiteren Abschnitte des Energielehrpfades dann zu dieser Relation hinzufügen.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
silversurfer83 (2022-10-18 15:27:50+00:00): Moin Roland,
Wenn ich die (englische) Wikiseite zu hw=path richtig lese ist es eigentlich unnötig das zu ändern, oder? Im Sinne von: Es ist nicht falsch einen asphaltierten Fußweg (ggf. sogar mit blauem Lolli) als path zu taggen.
(klar, es ist genau so korrekt einen designated footway als hw=footway zu taggen).
Grüße
silversurfer83
rolandmwagner (2022-10-18 16:24:51+00:00): Nun, ein Pfad ist etwas anderes als ein asphaltierter Fußweg oder gar Radweg.
Im Wald kann man freie, nicht als Kunstbauten definierte Wege als Pfad finden. 
Befestigte, also gepflasterte oder geterrte Bürgersteige werden in der Regel in OSM als footway getaggt, da es nichts genaueres gibt und es wohl gut genug ist.
Beste Grüße 
Roland
streckenkundler (2024-01-23 18:16:22+00:00): ...ob ein Weg asphaltiert ist oder nicht ist kein Unterscheidungskriterium für hw=path oder hw=footway
Allgemein hat sich durchgesetzt, bei Vorhandensein von Zeichen 240 oder Zeichen 241 highway=path zu verwenden. vgl. Wiki an div. Stellen, vgl. Tagging-Vorlagen, vgl. Verkehrszeichentool: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=240
highflyer74 (2022-10-18 10:38:29+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Handelt es sich hier um einen "Verkehrsberuhigten Bereich" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street)?

Wenn das der Fall ist, müsste noch maxspeed=* entfernt werden (wir taggen in diesem Fall keine maxspeed=*, siehe Wiki). Falls noch 30 erlaubt ist, wäre es ein highway=residential.

Viele Grüße aus HB!
marczoutendijk (2022-10-18 08:41:53+00:00): Made a mistake: Landuse -> Highways
Pankowradler (2022-10-20 11:22:57+00:00): Falsche Adresse, korrekt ist: Malchower Straße 28
Pawel Kleczek (2022-10-18 09:10:54+00:00): @Friendly_Ghost: Ok, thanks for that link - I didn't see it before!
Friendly_Ghost (2022-10-18 09:33:16+00:00): Thank you for your cooperation. The Ukrainian OSM community will be happy if you stop mapping in their country until the war is over.
eggie (2022-10-18 09:48:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Tip  In OSM taggen we instellingen/bedrijven op de adresnode. Dus niet nogmaals een adres toevoegen aan de gebouwomtrek.. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-18 09:53:20+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode.
Adres en info van gebouwomtrek  verwijderd
Met de adresnode zou je nog kunnen schuiven.
Gr eggie
Piskvor (2022-10-18 09:05:48+00:00): No trolley_wire exists in Čuprova, as of 2022-10-18: trolleybus routed "up" through Zenklova, wire extended from Palmovka to U Kříže. "Down" route from Kundratka on battery. Perhaps the wires might be added later (proposed:* ?), but unable to verify that. So, just updating to OTG state.

Remains to do: resurvey Palmovka loop and Na Žertvách, map parking stands at Palmovka.
Piskvor (2022-10-20 12:55:42+00:00): Completed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127837825
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
osmviborg (2022-10-18 10:10:03+00:00): Finjustering? https://imgur.com/a/w7Pej8N
osmviborg (2022-10-18 10:40:44+00:00): Hvordan kan et hul i jorden være en 'embankment'?
eggie (2022-10-18 10:06:18+00:00): Dag Nicoline..

Begrijpelijk, maar staat er een bord met max gewicht..?

Aan twee zijden stonden ooit paaltjes, maar die heeft iemand kennelijk weggehaald.
Zou het doorgeven aan de Gemeente.


MVG
eggie
MxxCon (2022-10-19 04:18:29+00:00): Hello.
Please do use meaningful changeset comments - “xxx” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127715273
rarad74 (2022-10-18 10:24:06+00:00): Salut. te rog sa nu mai creezei apartamente ca si nume de blocuri sau numere de adrese. Apartamentele sunt din categoria POI-uri - turism si induci in eroare utilizatrorii hartii. Daca doresti sa ajuti si sa adaugi numerele corecte ale blocurilor , foloseste editorul dedicatl al openstreetmap - ID . maps.me nu suporta adaugarea de numere de adrese sau blocuri.  O zi buna.
fndoder (2022-10-18 19:01:23+00:00): Там уже можно проехать (пройти), получается, со стороны ул. Тулпар на Вознесенский тракт? Или пока забор стройки перекрывает путь?
Григорий Захаров (2022-10-19 06:37:42+00:00): Забор стройки перекрывает путь
NieWnen (2022-10-19 09:16:16+00:00): Dlaczego zostało usunięte zwężenie do 1 linii, skoro tam nie ma 2 jezdni?
szalona_entropia (2022-10-19 09:54:34+00:00): Dla przejrzystości i prostoty:

'If a road contains any of the non-appropriate elements for some short distance, but is still separated by a physical obstructions along other parts of the road in the vast majority of its length, then the road can continue to exist as a dual carriageway for the moment. These exceptions are typically easy to recognize, and may be kept in-thought of ease of recognition, routing, presence, and functionality of the road, in lieu of more detail."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway
Adhil@123 (2022-10-18 10:30:56+00:00): please connect stream (make a contact ) with the river
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127716508
Tomasz Herud (2022-10-19 09:16:09+00:00): Na pewno to są stojaki U o pojemności 5? Pojemność U zwykle jest parzysta :)
Taya_S (2022-10-21 03:40:55+00:00): Both left and right sides of this path have their access restricted according to the map. Are you sure about the access situation here?
pjvds (2022-10-21 14:55:38+00:00): Thanks for the valuable feedback. I've corrected it. Entry parts of the path where marked with access=no, I changed it to private for the entire path.
Adhil@123 (2022-10-18 10:26:57+00:00): please make it as single stream...by selecting both by pressing shiftkey
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127717035
Adhil@123 (2022-10-18 10:27:03+00:00): please make it as single stream...by selecting both by pressing shiftkey
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127717035
Tomasz Herud (2022-10-19 09:13:09+00:00): Nie wiem czy jest sens, robić tak dokładne granice stref 30. Ja bym przyjmował, że jednak obejmuje całą ulicę.
ortho_is_hot (2022-11-03 00:31:41+00:00): Hi, Campbell Parade going past the park is concrete in this section, not asphalt?
exadeci (2022-11-03 00:52:21+00:00): Hey, there's a mix depending on the lane, from the traffic light near the park the left lanes (towards the north) are asphalt then it becomes concrete at the corner before the bus stop then again asphalt next to the golf course.
The right lanes are half asphalt from the traffic lights to that corner, concrete for 5m then asphalt again, after the bus stops it's concrete and restarts as asphalt at the same spot as the left lanes.
I just used the Street Complete app which didn't give me much precision on that
mapboy63 (2022-11-22 16:06:49+00:00): Why have you made these changes to Colwyn Road? It isn't one way between Seal Road and Valley Road as you have mapped. There's a no entry sign to vehicles near the the junction with Valley Road, which I mapped using a very short section of one way road (way 1091941908) quite recently. Making this much larger section of the road one way is incorrect.