piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2022-09-27 22:59:03+00:00): me entero ahora que tu descripción  "corregí dirección de negocios en David." no describe el cambio que operaste, pues cambiaste la extensión de todos los edificios en la manzana, y que esta operación la estás conduciendo en todo el área. creo que te convendría dejarte asesorar en la operación.
mariotomo (2022-09-28 14:11:29+00:00): alguna esperancia que consideres mis comentarios?
any hope you consider my comments?
Alvarado2510 (2023-04-23 22:59:13+00:00): el gimnacio es el nombre, lo conozco asi por mas de 4 decadas, es de uso escolar y actividades privadas, no tiene equipo para fitness, solo es cancha con gradas bajo techo.
jidanni (2022-10-03 18:13:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/937896043 is a separate footpath, to the side of the main footpath? Are  you sure?
JeffMaps (2022-10-03 18:53:41+00:00): I didn't draw the paths, I just altered the definition from footpath->path since they're not restricted to foot traffic (eg. bicycles are allowed). In any case, I believe the path is accurate if you check the satellite photos you'll see this is a bridge structures with paths down the sides (like sidewalks) and a space between them for vehicles.
jidanni (2022-10-04 00:05:12+00:00): I'm worried about the pedestrian bridge to Goat Island. It's the one on the west. Not the automobile bridge on the east. Anyway there's just one pedestrian lane, and no separations.
MxxCon (2022-09-22 04:24:33+00:00): Hello.
Just because something is blue doesn't make it a swimming pool. This is most definitely not a swimming pool. It's just a blue blanket or blue chairs. You wouldn't have a swimming pool the size of an umbrella..
As such this feature is going to be deleted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126483182
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-17 20:21:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063909283/history - wait, so is this antique shop operating or not? disused=yes is quite confusing here
abakus_uploader (2022-09-22 22:31:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2022-09-22 10:55:03+00:00): See my comment on another changeset.  I reviewed most of your mappings, and they all show the same issues. Please improve your mapping skills.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126483420
MxxCon (2022-09-22 04:46:47+00:00): Hello.
This is clearly not a swimming pool but a boat or a car cover or maybe a greenhouse.
Not everything blue is a swimming pool.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126483490
PPete2 (2026-06-01 07:25:16+00:00): Are you sure statue "Pumuckl" of artist "Mihajlo Kolodko" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10043773740 is still there?
felipeeugenio (2022-09-22 11:47:18+00:00): Hola.
Está bien que sea atracción turística, pero sigue siendo un mercado. hay un tag de marketplace (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmarketplace)

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126483652
Juampayo Escorpio (2022-09-22 16:39:03+00:00): Ya no es un mercado, los locales comerciales ya no funcionan como tal y fueron remodelados. Incluso, a uno de ellos, se le instaló la escultura de una virgen y es lugar de adoración.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126483652
felipeeugenio (2022-09-22 16:45:32+00:00): ah. ok
gracias
Frans S (2022-09-22 10:52:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 

* Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly. see hints 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126483695
CloCkWeRX (2022-12-04 03:01:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311692475 seems malformed/not matching to imagery. Is there still a roundabout?
Belltravelled (2022-12-04 03:21:05+00:00): The road network is not complete within the Midtown development (a rectangular shape being developed). The roundabout at Ivanhoe and Herring Rd is now traffic lights
CloCkWeRX (2022-12-04 03:50:19+00:00): Alright, I've tweaked the former roundabout not to have tags; and reconnected the bus route.
Since you've got a bit of local knowledge, might be worth double checking my edits.
Falsernet (2022-09-22 03:24:42+00:00): There are signs to the north. You're may be tilted and may think I'm stupid but that doesn't mean you're right
Falsernet (2022-09-22 03:25:42+00:00): If you want I can go and photograph tomorrow. Clearly you don't value anything I say
Pete Owens (2022-09-22 08:08:21+00:00): Indeed.

It is the END of the cycleway from the south (crossing the road) - which means it is the start of the cycleway heading in the opposite direction. ie SOUTH across the road.
Falsernet (2022-09-22 16:38:27+00:00): The boundary is where the fence is.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-24 13:20:35+00:00): @Falsernet Aren't we waiting for your photograph from 9 months ago as part of the previous argument about this 9 months ago on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116891119 ?

Please don't continue the edit war here on https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/1083622803 or anywhere in OSM.  It is a waste of everyone's time.  If you do, you'll be blocked from editing for a short period of time.
- Andy, from the DWG.
akadouri (2022-09-28 18:54:15+00:00): I think this building may have more than one name, both https://magnolia-dumbo.com/ and https://frontandyork.com/ refer to it.
JessAk71 (2022-09-29 17:56:28+00:00): thanks for the information, yes it looks like thats the case. I just updated it to reflect the two entities. thanks!
Frans S (2022-09-22 10:49:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126484467
MapPiper (2022-09-22 01:29:13+00:00): Changed citation source to: Esri World Imagery(Clarity); Strava
zstadler (2023-01-17 12:42:53+00:00): Hello geogidon,

In this edit the editor warned about "mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7342799 is no longer a valid relation.
zstadler (2023-01-19 05:21:34+00:00): I have restored the multi-polygon
geogidon (2023-01-19 13:00:14+00:00): Thank you, Zstadler! Maybe you can also undo the warning? I was still learning how this works, many months ago.
zstadler (2023-01-19 15:06:22+00:00): That's what I did
> I have restored the multi-polygon

You are welcome to join the OSM Israel telegram channel where you can get advice and support from fellow mappers:
https://t.me/OSM_Israel
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-28 13:06:02+00:00): why you deleted this road? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859255377
martien-176 (2022-09-23 18:11:20+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. I am reviewing mappings in this project as a validator.

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location and squareness. 

But pay attention to the tagging. In several cases you mapped building=residential or building=house, but that should be building=yes. As remote mappers we can not know the function of the building (unless you are a local mapper).

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126484731
pantufla (2023-02-19 03:01:29+00:00): Hola Wilmer, por alguna razón aparecieron un montón de puntos sin etiquetas en esta edición. Mira:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10043856884
Wilmer Osario (2023-02-21 00:46:57+00:00): Hola, efectivamente se habían duplicado los nodos del polígono de [landuse=residential]. Ya eliminé los nodos duplicados desde JOSM (cerca de 4.000)
Frans S (2022-09-22 08:16:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:

* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 
* Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126484816
felipeeugenio (2024-10-10 22:06:14+00:00): Hola. Tienes acceso a esa ordenanza municipal para la comuna de PAC? porque lo que nos estamos enterando es que el cambio fue en Lo Espejo, no en PAC.

Saludos
felipeeugenio (2025-06-22 20:54:58+00:00): reversado.
BubbaJuice (2022-09-22 02:46:36+00:00): Hello leaf-li,

This is not how you map parking lots. All the parking lots were already mapped here. I added streetside parking just a minute ago.  For future reference, use `amenity=parking` for parking. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking. It would be good for you to check out the rest of the wiki as well.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-22 06:15:50+00:00): name=The Crystal Keeper
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3032483812

maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Desoteric or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dnew_age would fit here?
m86 (2023-12-31 20:11:33+00:00): shop=esoteric seems reasonable enough - will re-tag this node
pyram (2022-09-23 21:04:21+00:00): Review:

That's OK.

Best regards
pyram
pyram (2022-09-23 21:00:38+00:00): Review (this and nearby changesets)

Review (this and nearby changesets)

Hi Hemanta Dhakal,

great to see an local Mapper!
There was some beginner-errors (see the "warnings" at this changeset).
I fixed that.

1. You added a new street, where a track was already mapped
(http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=126452203 - south part with yellow and green ways)

2. You added a junction at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3477203965/history
But "junction" is only needed at the highest street classes motorway and trunk ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway ). Normally they have a number or a name.

3. There was a mistake at this building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096512273 . You ca see it nearby the red line: http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=126485122

4. You removed this place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3494909939/history . Now this hamlet has no name. Is that really right?

What you could now do:
There are some intersections of streets/waterways without bridges. Please add ford=yes to this nodes (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3492923230 )

Any questions? Ask!

Best regards
pyram
Frans S (2022-09-22 10:42:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126485205
ottwiz (2023-03-10 15:54:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096866059/history#map=19/40.86431/-78.26507
Hey Shelby! I retagged this basketball court, for each features like this there are actually built in features in iD, and in JOSM, respectively.
ottwiz (2023-03-10 15:55:20+00:00): (I'm doing a complete overhaul on PA forest landcover, so I came across this)
kaltuna (2023-03-07 08:50:03+00:00): Hallo, es gibt eine Frage zu diesem Changieret. Schau mal bitte hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3585549
FraukeLeo (2023-03-14 06:51:51+00:00): erledigt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133651882
IknowJoseph (2022-09-22 15:43:01+00:00): hi, I've reverted your change as you made the street one-way towards a dead end. How would anyone drive out?
What sources did you use for the change? The previous edit to this road, removing the one-way tag was done to reflect the Oxford LTN physical changes.
daksnaid (2022-09-23 06:04:02+00:00): Hi, 
Thank you for your reviewing my changeset. This is an honest mistake from my end, where I missed out on checking the bollard at the other end and added directions based on the lane markings and sign board. Thanks for highlighting this issue, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors again. Thank you again, always happy to learn from community. 
Regards,
daksnaid
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-22 03:49:53+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 126418461, 126418471, 126418481, 126418492, 126423794.
czubi (2022-11-20 15:05:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3398127#map=16/50.8391/11.6055&layers=N
Nawfal85 (2022-09-22 11:45:32+00:00): Your edit is good because this place seems to be permanent and not temporary... But it is very important that this place and its name must be real and not fake.
ChehrehBargi (2022-09-22 18:25:08+00:00): Thank you. Don't worry, the edits I make are based on what I've seen first hand.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Syl (2022-09-22 07:04:47+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez a nouveau interverti le sens des arrêts Thorigné-Fouillard/Fouillard pour les lignes 50 et 150ex. Je l'avais déjà corrigé plusieurs fois et je vous l'avais signalé. C'est visiblement une erreur dans les données ouvertes (mais je ne suis pas sûr ici, vous ne précisez pas la source de vos modifications). Lors d'un de vos derniers imports je vous avez signalé les régressions que j'avais remarqué, pouvez-vous les noter pour ne pas les réimporter à chaque fois ?
Merci pour tous ces imports bien utiles mais si c'est pour écraser à chaque fois les améliorations faites après visite sur le terrain c'est assez décourageant.
mga_geo (2022-09-22 09:43:14+00:00): Bonjour Syl,
J'avais remonté à la STAR l'inversion des arrêts mais je n'ai eu aucune réponse. Pour certains arrêts, des corrections ont été faites mais je ne sais pas si c'est lié à mes signalements.
Je vais refaire un signalement.
Syl (2022-09-29 07:44:08+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de corriger à nouveau toutes les relations qui passent à l'arrêt Thorigné-Fouillard/Fouillard.
Même si la STAR ne corrige pas, serait-il possible de noter le problème pour ne plus le réimporter la prochaine fois ?
Merci.
mga_geo (2022-09-29 10:16:39+00:00): Bonjour Syl,
Si le problème était au niveau d'un arrêt, je pourrai assez simplement ne pas le mettre à jour (ajout d'un tag note:mga_geo).
J'utilise aussi cette méthode au niveau des routes, et ainsi je ne mets pas à jour globalement la route.
Le gros défaut est qu'il est nécessaire de faire toutes les modifs manuellement.
Marc
Syl (2022-09-29 14:03:48+00:00): Le problème est sur les lignes qui passent à l'arrêt Thorigné-Fouillard/Fouillard (dans les deux sens) et uniquement ceux là.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:52:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
skquinn (2022-09-22 06:03:07+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

The other four buildings are correct but the Memorial Scout House is definitely not an apartment building.
keimo (2022-09-26 08:19:08+00:00): Tässäkin muutoskokoelmassa on lisätty railway=station tageja useampaan kuin yhteen saman aseman objektiin. Tulen poistamaan tämän muutoskokoelman piakkoin, jos tämä ei muuten korjaannu.
keimo (2022-09-26 08:16:35+00:00): Hei, railway=station ja public_transport=station tageja olisi syytä olla vain yksi per asema, ks. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=station ("There should be only one railway=station element for each station"). Tulen poistamaan tämän muutoskokoelman piakkoin, jos et korjaa sitä itse.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:57:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:35:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:37:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Frans S (2022-09-22 08:26:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards. I reviewed all your changeset on this project. Please collect mappings and upload them in 1 changeset rather than uploading each single mapping
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126489078
Frans S (2022-09-22 07:58:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. 
I reviewed several changesets.
You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126489220