piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-07-10 02:52:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Carnildo (2018-07-10 06:27:53+00:00): If you want to map an island in a pond (or a courtyard in a building, or any other object with a hole in the middle), you want to create what OSM calls a "multipolygon":

1) Trace the outer and inner edges.
2) Select one of the edges, then shift-click to select the other one as well.
3) Right-click and select "Merge".

The editor is (usually) smart enough to realize that if you're merging two concentric objects, you want to cut the inner one out of the outer one.

I've done it for you here; you can look at it in the editor to see how it's done.
headap (2019-07-06 03:13:20+00:00): Is this permanently blocked? from where are you able to access the road?
Carnildo (2018-07-10 06:49:27+00:00): If you're having trouble telling what shape a building is, please switch background imagery (the third or fourth button from the top on the right-hand side, the one that looks sort of like three stacked sheets of paper).  What you've drawn here looks almost nothing like how the building appears in Esri Clarity, or Mapbox Satellite, or really anything except Bing Imagery.
viloan (2018-07-10 03:27:50+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Minh Nguyen (2019-03-11 20:25:06+00:00): Changeset 68037062 replaces these nodes with barrier=block nodes. As far as I know, noexit=yes is only used by QA tools, not by routers.
yaswap (2019-07-10 08:05:39+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit and apologies for the delayed response. We will follow your suggestions going forward. 

(yaswap on behalf of rawatg as he is not an active user)
Kuritsyn Roman (2018-07-18 15:51:15+00:00): Приветствую, в чём заключается "не проехать"? В каком состоянии дорога и на каком участке точно? Что за тег "barrier=нет_дороги" - некорректен по всем параметрам.
Можно описать абсолютно любой статус дороги и состояние полотна используя теги.
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-11 01:16:32+00:00): Be sure to check for source:maxspeed=* and remove/update as necessary if you change maxspeed=*.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60558471
phidauex (2018-07-10 04:30:06+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Be careful when removing tags - you removed "boundary=administrative" from the Mexico border, so I put it back. You can add new tags, but when in doubt, don't delete existing ones. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60558490
SpaceOrphan (2018-07-10 15:18:00+00:00): Oops! Sorry new to this website and was trying to add a biome out here.
If it isn’t any trouble for you, would you mind helping me out and tag this place for me. I would really appreciate it, thanks!
SpaceOrphan (2018-07-10 15:19:43+00:00): I am near the ocean, and trying to play Pokémon go and no water Pokémon are spawning.
phidauex (2018-07-11 02:45:03+00:00): Hi, no worries! Mapping in OSM is pretty easy, but there are some tricks. I corrected the accidental deletion of the "boundary" tag from the coastline, and made sure that some of the local bodies of water have "natural=coastline" for the water, "natural=beach" for the nearby beach, and "natural=water, water=pond/lagoon/tidalflat" for the other nearby bodies of water. Don't be scared off mapping - there looks to be a lot in Puerto Penasco that can be mapped, and adding parks, scrub, fountains and ponds can all provide useful info for PoGo. Note that Niantic doesn't download the OSM data except every few months, so it make take a little while for your improvements to kick in, but at least you are benefiting the community with better maps while doing it. Here are some more tips for getting started mapping: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
daram2 (2018-11-28 18:13:47+00:00): Hi muchsin saputra,

While working near Kota Kendaru,ID i have came across some of your edits where all the roads are marked as Unclassified.

As that of Satellite Imagery i can clearly confirm that these road will be Track roads.

way 606562064
way 606562067
way 606562062
way 606562066
way 606562065

It would be great help if you share me any link where i can differentiate roads based on policies you referred.

Thanks, 
daram2.
BrettM6000 (2018-07-13 13:33:21+00:00): Hi Warin61, Jack William Park was already mapped but you put a closed line named Jack Williams Park over top of it. I think your change can be removed. As well, Wiradjuri Park was already mapped. It is to the east beside the river. Although the LPI Base Map shows Wiradjuri Park where you have put it I believe this is an error. To confirm this you can look at the "Wiradjuri Park Master Plan" that you can find on the internet.
Warin61 (2018-07-13 22:46:24+00:00): Thanks Brett. 
Not zoomed in enough to see the Jack William Park so though it was not there. 
I have left behind the way for the LPI Wiradjuri Park as a warning for others .. the new tags will not render but should give a message to anyone who down loads that area.
BrettM6000 (2018-07-14 18:06:49+00:00): OK, yes that is fine, no worries. Thanks for the update.
Chetan_Gowda (2018-07-10 05:07:44+00:00): Removed large building feature  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/606513941 in this changeset.
DUGA (2021-10-29 19:35:26+00:00): I'm unable to verify your added road based on Strava data.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/606569375/history#map=16/40.0265/-79.3182

Please elaborate if possible. Is it a trail?
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-11 01:18:41+00:00): Adding sidewalks as separate footways is preferable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60559571
DACameron (2018-07-11 01:55:14+00:00): I thought so at first too, but then got disillusioned by some separate ways that I added and didn't like how they would have affected pedestrian routing.  I did more research and became convinced by the arguments that tagging the roadway is better.  There doesn't seem to be any consensus on this topic.  Even the wiki sometimes has conflicting info about what's better on the same page.  So why do you think separate is better?
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-12 04:28:05+00:00): Blind navigation, for one.  Tagging the way as sidewalk might work for situations like a cycleway where the sidewalk is part of the same pavement and not separated by a curb or grass or what have you.  Tagging the sidewalk separately is better when there's an obstacle like a curb in the way between the sidewalk and the street.

This also helps find you the ideal places to cross the street and the ideal side to walk on as well.

For the vehicular portion of the street, depending on local ordinances regarding jaywalking, it may be wise to add foot=no where sidewalks are mapped as separate ways to discourage pedestrian navigation down the street instead of a sidewalk.
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-12 04:30:02+00:00): Basically, more detail is better than less detail, more information is better than simplified information.  I might speed through and just tag sidewalk=whatever on the main way as a rough cut, if I fancy doing some detail mapping on something, I might then search for sidewalk=* !highway=footway to get a start for the todo list plugin, and then detail map the sidewalks.
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-12 04:31:17+00:00): Also potentially a safety boon for AR games like Pokemon, since I understand there's some in-game elements that spawn based on the presence of sidewalks, having a separate way for the sidewalks will tend to have these spawn farther from the right-of-way centerline and closer to the actual pedestrian centerlines.
Estefania Lomas (2018-07-10 05:39:40+00:00): prueba mapeo
user_5359 (2018-07-11 04:33:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
dooley (2018-07-11 10:20:01+00:00): Please stop changing addr:street of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161536649/history 
and adding non-existing POIs to OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5750789522
On next try i'll notify OSM Workinggroup about vandalism.
pbnoxious (2018-07-10 20:58:06+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für deinen Eintrag!
Nachdem du "review_requested" angegeben hast hier ein Hinweis: der "name"-tag dient dazu um tatsächliche Namen von Dingen und nicht nur "Kategorien" einzutragen (siehe auch 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name ). Der von dir gesetzte Name "Trampelpfad" auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1174746724 ist vermutlich eher zur Einordnung der Qualität des Weges, als zur Bennenung gedacht.
highflyer74 (2018-07-11 08:13:56+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Ein paar Tipps möchte ich hier loswerden: Wege müssen immer mit anderen Wegen verbunden sein, da sonst keine Navigation auf ihnen möglich ist. Im Süden steht ein Node (Punkt) mit dem Namen "Trampelpfad". Wenn dies der offizielle Name des Pfades wäre, müsste er an den Weg selbst getaggt werden und nicht auf einen Punkt des Weges. Da der Weg ja aber vermutlich so nicht heisst, sondern "Trampelpfad" eine Eigenschaft des Weges ist, wird dieses im Tag highway=* verarbeitet. Im konkreten Fall ist dies highway=path (nicht =footway, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway).
Sei so nett, Landflächen nicht mit Wegen zu verbinden. Das ist zwar nicht verboten, viele halten es allerdings für kontraproduktiv, da die Wartung der Daten erschwert wird und viele übereinander liegende Linien gerade bei Anfängern die Gefahr vergrößern, Dinge wie z.B. Relationen aus Versehen zu beschädigen. Da kann es vorkommen, dass zwei oder drei Grenzen, zwei Landflächen und ein Feldweg nur als eine Linie dargestellt werden. Wenn der Bearbeiter dann nicht darauf achtet (weil er es vielleicht nicht weiß), gehen gern mal Grenzrelationen zu Bruch und das verursacht wieder Mehrarbeit.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
zstadler (2018-10-07 06:35:21+00:00): ,OSM-שלום זוהר וברוך הבא ל
.
בעריכה זו הוספת קטע קצר יחסית של שביל אופניים שמסומן בסימון כחול.
.
אני לא רואה את השביל הזה במפת סימון שבילים או באתר מסלולי האופניים של קק"ל
.
?למי שייך הסימון הכחול
.
בברכה,
זאב
Владимир К (2018-07-10 07:03:13+00:00): Добрый день!
спасибо за ваш вклад.
То что вы нарисовали сразу попадает в базу. 
вот этим вы что хотели обозначить https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/606583502? газон?
Saddam16kw (2018-07-10 11:29:09+00:00): там установлены несколько скамеек. скорее всего попадает под место отдыха.
Владимир К (2018-07-10 12:18:12+00:00):  у нас проблемы с эти тегом, resreation_ground. не поянтно что он вообще обозначает. лучше убрать его и нарисовать отдельные скамейки, газоны, дорожки, т.п.
William Allen (2018-07-13 10:44:35+00:00): 2 Huntsmans way
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-11 01:21:11+00:00): OK start to building mapping; a tighter attention to detail is appreciated on geometry.  This may be substantially easier to achieve in JOSM than id.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60560680
Darkskynet (2018-07-11 01:35:50+00:00): Okay, thanks. I will get JOSM and use that for my building edits for now on.
zstadler (2018-10-07 06:34:13+00:00): ,OSM-שלום זוהר וברוך הבא ל
.
בעריכה זו הוספת קטע קצר יחסית של שביל אופניים שמסומן בסימון כחול.
.
אני לא רואה את השביל הזה במפת סימון שבילים או באתר מסלולי האופניים של קק"ל
.
?למי שייך הסימון הכחול
.
בברכה,
זאב
mavl (2018-07-23 07:55:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
Zsolt Medgyesi (2018-08-21 09:05:39+00:00): Hello,

a barrier=yes vonalakra nézve nem igazán azt jelenti, mint amire szerintem itt te gondoltál, hanem olyasmit, hogy az egy fal,kerítés vagy hasonló más akadály. 
Ha azt akarod jelölni, hogy az adott útszakaszra nem lehet behajtani, akkor hagyd meg a highway="út típusa" tag-et és egyesével jelölöd, hogy mivel nem lehet bemenni (motor_vehicle=no, bicycle=no,foot=no,...). 
Ha pontszerű akadály van (pl:csak az utca egyik vége van lezárva valamivel), akkor a vonal azon pontjára rakj egy barrier="akadály típusa" tag-et és azon jelöld, hogy mivel és hogyan nem szabad behajtani. 
Ha magát az utat építik, akkor highway=construction + construction="az út típusa" is egy bevett jelölés. 
A lényeg, hogy ha ez a vonal továbbra is egy utca, akkor maradjon rajta valamilyen formában egy highway tag.
Ha már véglegesen elbontották / nem használják / egyéb viszonylag drasztikus dolog történt, akkor a lifecycle tag-elést javasolnám .(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix)
(pl: abandoned:highway="út típusa")
Ez azért jó, mert megmarad a szerkesztőben és nem áll elő az, hogy valaki véletlenül újra berajzolja egy régi műholdkép alapján.

Ha bármi kérdés lenne, szívesen segítünk! 
(és is vagy bárki más a levlistán https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/openstreetmap-hungary)

Üdv 
Zsolt
camenzind (2018-08-21 09:48:28+00:00): Hello, javítottam legjobb tudásom szerint, Módosításcsomag: 61849412

Üdv
Zsolt Medgyesi (2018-08-21 10:54:12+00:00): Abszolút csodálatos :)
Még majd a kapcsolatokra kellene valamikor ránézni (úthálózat-kapcsolatok,busz-útvonalak, kanyarodási szabályok,...), de szerintem azzal lehet várni, amíg elkészül az új felüljáró.
Köszi
Zsolt
mavl (2018-07-23 07:54:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60967019 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2096].
user_5359 (2018-07-15 06:01:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Are really new keys (estado agrietado, materiales, tiempo) necessary to describe the condition of the buildings. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:condition, https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=estado+agrietado (different spellings), https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:material
eggie (2018-07-10 07:15:23+00:00): Bij de Boksumerdyk loopt landuse=grass en natural=water nog door elkaar. Die transparant "Industrial" zou ik helemaal los houden van alles.
eggie (2018-07-10 07:15:52+00:00): Je edit  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60562337&zoom=21&lat=53.18224&lon=5.7586&layers=B0TTTFT
E de Wit (2018-07-10 17:41:42+00:00): De overlap heb ik zo te zien met een eerdere wijziging aangepast.
"Industrial" is nu volledig losgekoppeld.
eggie (2018-07-10 18:22:01+00:00): Oke...   Was gewoon bij toeval dat ik het zag. Ben niet 
speciaal aan het kijken :)
Mapse..
Bezoek oo het forum om op de hoogte te blijven van de ontwikkelingen. Jezelf voorstellen kan in het draadje welkom.
Je projecten in  "Het wie-wat-waar overzichtstopic"
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
E de Wit (2018-07-10 19:04:21+00:00): Maakt niet uit, dingen als "Industrial" loskoppelen is wel handig om rekening mee te houden :)
Ik zal van de week even kijken wie er allemaal actief is in deze regio. (En waar evt. extra handen nodig zijn)
eggie (2018-07-10 20:35:41+00:00): Zie hier: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/oooc?zoom=14&lat=53.18639&lon=5.75816&layers=B0
dikkeknodel (2018-07-11 12:18:39+00:00): Hi Santiago,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Switzerland. I noticed you gave spanish names (name:es) to viewpoints without a local name. Additionally, it seems these spanish names are actually descriptions of what is visible.If the later is true, please move to description:es tag.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-07-19 13:56:15+00:00): Have been removed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60873637
abakus_uploader (2018-07-10 22:35:20+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
RicoElectrico (2018-07-10 11:50:19+00:00): Dzięki za poprawę. Teraz jest ok!
L'imaginaire (2018-07-13 19:57:00+00:00): Is this also a oneway street for bicycles? If not, please add a "oneway:bicycle=no" tag. That way, routing for bicycles can take this into account.

Keep on mapping!
Jarek 🚲 (2018-07-16 19:07:46+00:00): Hi, 

Thank you for adding the Hunsing clinic.

Your edit also broke the map a bit (see in screenshots: https://imgur.com/a/YOroSuL ). I have now un-done the broken parts in changeset 60773787.

Cheers,
Jarek
Matthew Darwin (2018-10-25 15:50:08+00:00): The opening hours for "Quanfu Zhou Chinese Medicine & Acupuncture Clinic" are a bit strange.  Could you clarify?  Currently it says: Mon-Fri: 9:30AM to 6:00PM, Sat: 9:30AM-5PM, Sun-Thurs: Closed.   Mon-Fri and Sun-Thu overlap.
manings (2018-07-11 12:21:59+00:00): @peter, thanks for the revertion.  I clearly made a mistake here.  

>  elaborate on the rationale for making this section of Southeast Division Street a dual-carriageway

I interpreted the no passing zone as indicated in the road marking as a proxy for dual-carriageway since it implies "crossing the line is prohibited".  I am probably wrong.

I did tried as much as I can to retain the relations, but I obviously did not do a good job using iD.  I'll be careful next time.
d_berger (2018-07-10 09:18:39+00:00): Hi, Frage bezüglich deiner Änderung: bist du sicher, dass Halle J abgebildet ist? Die müsste im zweiten oder dritten UG liegen, zudem IIRC um 90° gekippt östlich von E-H?
axelschw (2018-07-10 09:44:51+00:00): Ja. Sie ist in der Tat im zweiten UG.
Tomas Straupis (2018-07-10 08:47:07+00:00): iD redaktoriuje nubraižius pastatą (arba tiesiog pažymėjus pastatą) galima spausti „s“, tada pastato kampai bus padaryti stačiais.
venuscomputer (2018-07-10 07:58:32+00:00): منزل ذبیح اله رحیمی پدر ونوس
Константин Гам (2018-08-20 08:22:56+00:00): Зачем вы удалили отмеченные POI в реально существующем здании? Вы хоть смотрите, что делаете или диванный маппинг форева?
Константин Гам (2018-08-20 08:33:35+00:00): https://photos.app.goo.gl/HQaeVKYoog2Sut869
fserges (2018-08-21 07:15:56+00:00): В Петербурге очень много новостроек, все их вживую нереально посещать каждый месяц и в целом они сообществом ОСМ слабо поддерживаются. Поэтому ряд правок делается путём сверки с фотографиями на сайтах новостроек/дольщиков/стройфирм. Иногда бывают и ошибки. Но при том количестве новостроя 1% ошибок не должен быть большой проблемой.

Если что-то исправлено некорректно - конечнго откатывайте/восстанавливайте.
GRUBERND (2018-07-10 15:28:44+00:00): hi.. nice work. just one note: keeping the history of objects is considered the highest form of editing - instead of delete & new drawing you can try to reshape the existing object. this even works when creating a building from a single node. most of the time it is even faster.
changeset with deletes trigger warnings in quality control tools.
cheers, grubernd
GOwin (2018-12-17 02:20:39+00:00): Kindly don't duplicate features that are already on the map by adding a second POI node of the same, just so it would render as as icons.
Nakaner (2018-07-10 11:51:41+00:00): Hi Petymag,

please stop this mechanical edit.

When and where did you discuss it?

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2018-07-10 11:53:03+00:00): Just for reference: This series of changesets is most likely subject to the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
woodpeck_repair (2018-07-10 16:46:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60583682, 60582355 where the changeset comment is: revert mechanical edit of power=sub_station after complaints from the community. this claimed to be a maproulette edit but nobody can edit 12,000 objects with the required diligence in such a short time
gormo (2018-07-10 14:09:49+00:00): Hallo Aronimus und herzlich wilkommen bei Openstreetmap!

Der Spätkauf, den du eingetragen hast, ist schon als Kiosk eingetragen, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2533442347 . Die Position ist direkt an der Hauswand. Kannst Du deinen neuen Spätkauf wieder löschen? Was am bestehenden Knoten noch fehlt sind Öffnungszeiten. Versuch die mal rauszufinden und an den Kiosk-Knoten einzutragen.

Viele Grüße und weiter viel Spaß bei OSM!
Aronimus (2018-07-11 07:45:34+00:00): Danke!! Ich sollte jetzt den Punkt raus genommen haben, bin mir aber unsicher ...
Öffnungszeiten trage ich im laufe der kommenden Woche nach!
LG