piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
user_5359 (2017-01-06 16:04:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use highway=footway!
RyFitt (2017-01-06 16:47:45+00:00): I'm not really sure how to do this exactly so if you would like to modify and make it correct let me know what I need to do!
user_5359 (2017-01-06 16:53:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! (I am sorry, I forgot this at the first comment.) Please follow the link named "Pedistrian Path" and you see my modification. More detail for the social tags see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway.

If you need help: You are welcome!
user_5359 (2017-01-06 16:35:23+00:00): Please notice the difference between highway=footway and highway=pedistrian (more details see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org)
QuiLe (2025-10-20 22:03:32+00:00): Hello I believe this has been corrected now.
user_5359 (2025-10-21 05:23:35+00:00): Welcome back to OSM!
mueschel (2017-01-10 11:32:10+00:00): Hallo,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464103122
Der Key 'Backhaus" macht so wenig Sinn, 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbakehouse
Lothar Schiborr_1 (2017-01-10 12:20:35+00:00): Danke,
erledigt
Supaplex (2017-01-06 16:37:38+00:00): 你好：

一般用highway=proposed, proposed=motorway來標示高速公路預定線。如果直接畫成已經有了會造成導航誤判。
eggie (2017-09-26 15:34:13+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. Dus alsnog per PB gestuurd
Jojo4u (2017-04-02 22:10:55+00:00): Hallo Seetroll, kurze Frage: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464121823 ist noch oneway=yes, vermutlich ein Versehen? Ich habe es gemäß dem traffic_sign=DE:240;1000-33 als oneway=no gekennzeichnet.

LG Joachim
saintam1 (2017-01-07 21:28:56+00:00): Здравейте,

Официалните наименования на кв. Слатина и Редута са "ж.к. Христо Смирненски" и "кв. Подуяне" (дори и в общината са ме поправяли). Неофициалните наименования (Слатина и Редута) са вече на картата:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305862711

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2178244011

Нямам нищо против да възстановя аз информацията.
edvac (2017-03-19 17:53:39+00:00): In this changeset you have used data from the Institut National de la Statistique du Niger (http://www.stat-niger.org/statistique/).
Have you discused this data import with the local community (OSM-NE) and the overall OSM community, and follow the Import Guidelines?
Otherwise, this changeset should be reverted.
sabas88 (2017-01-06 19:10:24+00:00): Poi ci spieghi chi è archer e quali sono le robe belle :-)
EneaSuper (2017-01-10 10:48:28+00:00): Dopotutto sembra stare facendo delle ottime modifiche a Pegli e a Pra'...
edvac (2017-03-19 17:53:33+00:00): In this changeset you have used data from the Institut National de la Statistique du Niger (http://www.stat-niger.org/statistique/).
Have you discused this data import with the local community (OSM-NE) and the overall OSM community, and follow the Import Guidelines?
Otherwise, this changeset should be reverted.
rskedgell (2023-01-12 16:46:24+00:00): The fence had been removed by late 2019, however there is still a kerb and Seething Lane should not be connected to the cycle track or carriageway of Byward Street, just the sidewalk.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4049675791760653
edvac (2017-03-19 17:53:13+00:00): In this changeset you have used data from the Institut National de la Statistique du Niger (http://www.stat-niger.org/statistique/).
Have you discused this data import with the local community (OSM-NE) and the overall OSM community, and follow the Import Guidelines?
Otherwise, this changeset should be reverted.
BCNorwich (2017-01-07 08:34:29+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
OSM is a live worldwide database, we add features ti that are verifiable on the ground for other folk to make good maps. Your addition was obviously a test or an inadvertent addition so I've removed it. Regards
stev (2017-01-06 16:52:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

You need to be careful what you are editing - you have edited things in Wilmslow, Bucks, UK as well as Tanzania, which I guess might not be what you intended to do. This will have to be reverted back, so please try to be a bit more careful, and if you don't understand something, ask on the mailing list, or other support channels available at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
km2bp (2017-01-07 08:23:32+00:00): Witaj !  Dodając sklepy i punkty usługowe  spróbuj dodać trochę więcej informacji  do każdego punktu takich jak nr. telefonu  , stronę www,  nie wspominając o danych adresowych jest to potem bardzo przydatne  podczas korzystania z mapy mobilnej dając możliwość telefonowania bezpośrednio z mapy  ltd.
km2bp (2017-01-07 08:24:22+00:00): Większość danych jest dostępna w internecie
mavl (2017-01-12 17:26:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:35:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
BeKri (2017-01-08 02:05:36+00:00): Servus,
gibt es einen Grund, warum Du die Hausnummern
Mathildenstraße 3c und 5 und
Pettenkoferstraße 6 entfernt hast ?
Sind die abgerissen worden ?
Tungmar (2017-01-08 17:31:53+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe sie wieder eingefügt.
Gruss
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-07 08:58:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-01-07 01:32:25+00:00): Forgot to remove Reverter from the created_by tag. I'll remove that on my next set of edits.
Commodoortje (2017-01-06 19:14:22+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-06 19:16:21+00:00): Je hebt nr 51 toegevoegd aan 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287448239
Weet je dit zeker?
Doorgaans worden de BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) verzoeken sneller opgepakt via he OSM forum.
Volgens de BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) is het nr 50

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?searchQuery=50%20Proostwetering%20Utrecht&objectId=0344010000104700&geometry.x=131330.896&geometry.y=458293.707&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0344010000104700
Mike Baggaley (2017-01-23 17:56:31+00:00): Hi is this road really named "School Access Road"? This seems more like a description.

Cheers,
Mike
Atlas Taxis (2017-01-30 16:14:51+00:00): Hi Mike.
You are correct It has no real name. I have removed the name.
Cheers
Jim
GerdP (2017-08-31 08:56:48+00:00): Hi!
Please review highway=turning_loop on
way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464160701
The tag is only used for nodes:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=turning_loop
This looks like a trunk_link.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:31:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
GerdP (2017-08-23 07:45:58+00:00): Hi!
Please check typo highway="Phyliss Lane" on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464167197
user_5359 (2017-01-07 08:45:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! And the other side https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307966691 doesn’t change the name?

If you need help: You are welcome!
AsgerFrank (2017-01-06 20:09:18+00:00): Adressepunkterne ("husnumrene") skal man stort set altid lade være, så jeg har flyttet din oplysning fra det over på et hurtigt omrids af huset i stedet. Og så selvfølgelig tilføjet club=scout :-)
Du kan evt. selv forbedre med fx at tilføje  website og/el facebook til husomridset, eller lave indkørsel osv.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-01-27 04:20:17+00:00): Hej, super że znalzłaś/znalazłeś nowe stojaki rowerowe.

Czy umożliwiają one przypięcie roweru za ramę czy to wyrwikółki umożliwające tylko przypięcie za koło?

W pierwszym przypadku lepiej jako typ podać "stands" a w druging "wall_loops" (umożliwia to rozróżnienie dobrych i kiepskich parkingów rowerowych - sam wygląd, jeśli ma znaczenie powinien być raczej inaczej zaznaczony).

Dzięki jeszcze raz za zaznaczenie - ciekawe czy to nowe obiekty czy je przegapiłem podczas mapowania stojaków na Politechnice.
user_5359 (2017-01-07 08:41:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

see shop=mall oder shop=supermarket (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop)
robbieonsea (2017-01-07 11:32:17+00:00): The Wikidata ID for at least the Amsterdam Shipwreck was valid, so why did you remove it?
pintoch (2017-01-07 11:38:44+00:00): If I'm not wrong the wikidata ID was that of its replica in Amsterdam, not the actual shipwreck… But I can't find the Wikidata ID I removed :-/. Anyway Q26674641 seems to be the right one, so let's add it.

For the Argos shop, it had wikidata ID https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q189901 , which is clearly wrong.
pintoch (2017-01-07 11:46:31+00:00): The id I removed on the shipwreck was https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q478353 , which indeed refers to the replica in Amsterdam, not the actual shipwreck!

So my edit was correct :-) But thank you for checking!
pintoch (2017-01-07 12:05:18+00:00): Or it could be that the Wikidata ID was fixed before by someone else, but the wikidata-osm tool data was not updated so it still displayed the conflict…
pintoch (2017-01-07 12:10:31+00:00): ok yeah, that's what happened: http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=3192282124
sorry about that!
Bexhill-OSM (2017-01-15 01:33:18+00:00): Yep that was me, I fixed it not long ago, then saw this changeset and got very confused.  Thanks for reverting.
BCNorwich (2017-01-07 08:18:55+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to point out that the area (please see here :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464178639#map=17/51.45434/-0.15097), you added has no descriptive tags and thus adds nothing to the database. Map compilers don't know what it is so it's ignored. Could you describe the area's usage with tags please? Regards
BCNorwich (2017-01-08 07:10:17+00:00): If you are saying in your changeset comment that this area is fenced then it should be tagged such. However please be more precise with the fence line and include any gaps, gates and the status of ways through the fence. Thanks.
Commodoortje (2017-01-07 07:59:32+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-07 07:59:52+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik paar stukjes aangepast.
muralito (2017-01-08 04:32:45+00:00): Pablo, a cada elemento de la realidad le corresponde un solo elementos en OSM. Si el Ministerio (office=government) lo mapeas en el edificio, no le podes agregar la misma etiqueta al nodo con la direccion. El nodo con la direccion puede tener el numero de puerta exacto. Lo mismos datos de direccion se los podes poner al edificio, porque una direccion si se puede duplicar. Si no te quedo claro como avisà y te muestro..
mipijaentuculo (2017-01-08 19:24:45+00:00): Gracias por tu ayuda. Estoy aprendiendo y es mi primer contribución. Hay algo que no estoy entendiendo bien. ¿El problema es que usé dos elementos distintos (un área y un punto) para marcar el edificio del Ministerio? Debería usar uno solo?
muralito (2017-01-09 17:51:43+00:00): Podes mapear el area como edificio, y el punto como direccion, pero solo a uno de ellos le debieras poner el office=government.

Aca tenes los criterios https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element (no esta traducido)

Como el nodo ya lo habias borrado, le agregue el office=government + government=ministry al edificio.

En el caso de edificios grandes, conviene marcarle las entradas al edificio con entrance=main o entrance=yes porque es a esos puntos donde debieran guiarte los navegadores.
bigbug21 (2017-01-19 20:39:35+00:00): Hallo echoray, ich möchte einfach mal dir kurz DANKE für die vielen Ergänzungen von Blockkennzeichen und Stop Markern entlang der VDE 8.1 bedanken. Nachdem im Raum Coburg (z. B. am Tunnel Feuerfelsen) offenbar gerade Lichtsignale errichtet werden, sehe ich zu, selbst im Februar nach Coburg zu fahren und selbst einige Beiträge zu leisten. Falls du eher nach Coburg kommst: umso besser!
karitotp (2017-01-10 15:32:01+00:00): Hi Sparks, thanks for contributing to OSM. While I was working in this area, I found that you added a natural=water in a way, but I think that tag is for a multipolygon which already exists in the same place.
Sparks (2017-01-10 21:22:52+00:00): Yeah, I may have doubled up on that tag by accident.  I've been trying to fix the Patuxent River ever since something changed and OSMAND doesn't render the waterway any longer at higher zoom levels.  I don't see the problem with the Potomac River which is similarly tagged.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:26:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:26:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:25:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
SomeoneElse (2017-12-12 18:49:07+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464186215 perhaps a hedge?
Cheers,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-19 01:24:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46204825 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits to skiing areas (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5088068, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1202 for more information)
Eebie (2017-03-06 23:05:45+00:00): That trunk link was deleted because it was removed after the work were finished. The imagery isn't up to date.
user_5359 (2017-01-07 18:27:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your "test entry".
user_5359 (2017-01-07 08:29:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the definition of highway type  (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway)
SomeoneElse (2017-01-07 00:08:05+00:00): Hello Mattjon and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Here you've changed Felix Close from being a residential road to a footpath: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/428762672/history .  If it really is a residential road (which the underlying OS OpenData from which it was added suggests) please don't change it to be a footpath.  OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it exists, not as we might want it to exist.
There are, however, lots of things that need mapping in the "new build" areas of Peterborough like here - I'm sure that there are plenty of paths between roads that haven't been added yet, and also around the small areas of parkland and lakes that there are.
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this, just trying to help - any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
BCNorwich (2017-01-07 10:32:22+00:00): Hi, yes welcome, another observation is that this way has ended up duplicated. When the status of the way is resolved the duplicated way should be removed.
Regards Bernard
user_5359 (2017-01-07 08:17:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t forget to add the crossing node between the highways.
TheSwavu (2017-01-13 05:21:39+00:00): Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464199650

really have quotation marks in it's name?
gormur (2017-01-13 09:26:25+00:00): No. But it isn't an official name either. Added a note.
AsgerFrank (2017-01-06 22:43:11+00:00): I transportsammenhæng findes vist ikke et line-tag. Rutenummer kan angives med ref=21 (Netværk i iD).
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref
Bjørn Nielsen (2017-01-06 22:52:34+00:00): Du har naturligvis ret, det var en "brain fart" fra min side.
Jrachi (2020-05-23 13:30:08+00:00): Dovresti creare delle relazioni per le linee di trasporto.
Osmose segnala:
The network should be on the transport lines and not on the stops
Tu hai messo tutto sui nodi che dovrebbero contenere solo la posizione di stop.
Ciao
Virgile1994 (2020-05-23 13:38:13+00:00): Il problema e che e una rete di trasporti a domandi. Non ci sono linee. Bisogna prenotare il tramorto tra due fermate, e ogni giorno gli autobus hanno un itinerario differente che dipende dei trasporti del giorno.
Jrachi (2020-05-23 13:57:59+00:00): Allora è un bel casino!
Mapparla meglio, intendo.
Alexander Puzynia (2017-01-06 22:07:35+00:00): I mean Taxi services
Rodrigo Rega (2017-01-08 02:01:29+00:00): Hola.

En este conjunto de cambios se han generado errores con las relaciones de restricciones de giro ya que se han eliminado nodos presentes en las mismas. También han quedado vías que se cruzan sin nodo común.

Ambos errores generan problemas de enrutado.

¿Prefieres arreglar estos problemas o revertimos el conjunto de cambios?
JavierSp (2017-01-08 13:56:51+00:00): Buenas : )
He revertido los cambios para ver que me había cargado y empezar de cero. Sobre las vías que se cruzan en entradas y salidas, si están conectadas a una rotonda deben ir sin nodo debido a que dan error de enrutamiento por eso he vuelto a crear un par de vías alternativas. Puedes comprobarlo bajándote el archivo de errores de alternativas libres, dentro estará el archivo flares_Esp.txt junto otros.
Rodrigo Rega (2017-01-08 17:03:45+00:00): Buenas de nuevo,
Por si no nos estamos refiriendo a las mismas vías, te dejo una captura donde se ven a las que me refiero [1]. Los errores de enrutamiento que comentas se solventan usando relaciones de restricción de giro. Tal y como puedes leer aquí [4], dos vías que están conectadas físicamente al mismo nivel no se deben cruzar sin un nodo común como ocurre en [3].
Antes de tus ediciones estaba como se ve en esta captura [2], el cruce de vías verde tiene restricción de giro y no tendrá problemas de enrutamiento. El cruce rojo sí tendría problemas de enrutamiento ya que no tiene restricción. Para arreglarlo habría que añadir una relación de restricción, pero nunca eliminar el nodo que une a ambas vías.

En esta última edición tuya sigue existiendo el problema. Si quieres revierto y añado la restricción de giro que falta.

Un saludo!

[1] http://i.imgur.com/bSZDZ4q.png
[2] http://i.imgur.com/64fpot8.png
[3] http://i.imgur.com/vVG8wdf.png
[4] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways#Crossing_ways
JavierSp (2017-01-08 19:17:14+00:00): Perfecto. Vamos a ver si se arregla así. Revierte los cambios y haz los cambios que creas oportunos. Si vuelve a salir el error te lo comento a ver que puede ser.

Un saludo
Rodrigo Rega (2017-01-08 20:49:58+00:00): Revertido y añadidas un par de restricciones de giro. Sí, si te sigue apareciendo como error, coméntame y miramos qué se puede hacer.
Un placer trabajar contigo :) Un saludo
suschtenname (2017-02-15 17:53:32+00:00): This cable car is used to transport goods to the construction site for a new gondola lift between Trockener Steg and Matterhorn glacier paradise. Therefore I reverted your changeset.
MMN-o (2017-01-07 12:54:14+00:00): Halloj! När jag kikar på satellit/flygbild så tolkar jag det som att stugan du märkte ut är någon slags grillstuga som ligger _intill_ en boulebana (den mörkare grå ytan). Stämmer det?

Jag kan lägga till boulebanan i sig och så, men är nyfiken på om _stugan_ faktiskt heter "Boulebanan" (angivet med någon skylt eller så) eller om det bara är något du ställde in för att det ska visas på kartan?
ml73 (2017-01-07 13:31:34+00:00): Hej! Det är helt riktigt att vindskyddet/grillplatsen ligger bredvid en boulebana. Är osäker om den är märkt med skylt. Kan kolla senare i vecka då jag är hemmavid.
MMN-o (2017-01-07 14:26:53+00:00): Jag mekade omkring lite (och justerade bakgrundskartan när jag gjorde det, eftersom flygbilderna oftast är några meter off) och har nu ritat ut boulebanan!

Satte värde för "loc_name" (lokalt namn) till "Boulebanan". Känn dig fri att sätta det som ett vanligt "name"-värde om det faktiskt är det den heter - och inte bara i lokal terminologi :)
user_2842609 (2017-01-06 23:39:51+00:00): Merci :) C'est important d'indiquer les limitations de vitesse :)
Happy mapping !
user_5359 (2017-01-07 07:53:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.
Jojo4u (2017-01-22 16:17:34+00:00): Hallo schnicklaas, bitte verwende Änderungssatzkommentare beim Speichern der Änderungen. So können andere Mapper deine Änderungen besser einschätzen.

LG Joachim
k1wi (2017-01-07 11:32:14+00:00): El parking estaba mejor mapeado como estaba antes. Con los cambios que has hecho han aparecido unas calles encima de la plaza que no existen.
yopaseopor (2017-01-07 11:35:46+00:00): Siento discernir, es problema del renderizador. Esas "calles" están marcadas como subterráneas (layer-1 , underground=yes) y solucionan problemas básicos de ruteamiento (que considero son más importantes que el "aspecto" de OSMCarto, además de ser el inicio de mapeado interior de esos aparcamientos.
k1wi (2017-01-07 11:48:02+00:00): layer=-1 no indica que algo esté bajo tierra y underground ni siquiera tiene una pagina en la wiki

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:underground
yopaseopor (2017-01-07 12:02:13+00:00): Tienes razón, por eso he cambiado el underground=yes por location=underground (que sí la tiene) y le he añadido el indoor=yes. El layer -1 lo mantengo porque realmente quiero que esas vías no salgan a ras de calle, sino por debajo de , que es dónde están. Si el render te muestra vías subterráneas como las del metro (lo puedes comprobar en Barcelona o Madrid) ya no es cosa mía. El ruteamiento sigue siendo ahora correcto, aunque OSMCarto quede un poco más "feo". Yo procuro no mapear para el render.