piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2025-10-24 11:09:21+00:00): Bij Medevoort 18 en 20 is het fout gegaan.
Kun je daar nog even naar kijken ?
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.60752&lat=51.46737&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.74&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way
eggie (2023-03-08 11:04:50+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen...  Bij deze alsnog..
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MCDA (2015-03-11 15:54:19+00:00): The Island of Enniskillen is mostly commercial properties, with very little residential.  I therefore disagree with this large area of residential landuse, when it clearly is not the case.  Also the landuse area is extending into the water in places.
naoliv (2015-07-09 23:54:50+00:00): Cruzeirense, de onde você obteve o nome das rodovias?
O que você utilizou para inserir os nomes?
GerdP (2015-11-03 07:25:27+00:00): please review: would you mind to change
the rarely used highway=old_bus_stop
to disused:highway=bus_stop ?
You have used it for two nodes, one is this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1695389430
Iago Egea (2021-08-20 15:40:08+00:00): hola que tal
Leonard Ehrenfried (2020-06-29 08:14:24+00:00): Hallo schönbuch,

laut der Website von Nette Toilette (http://www.die-nette-toilette.de/wer-macht-bereits-mit.html) nimmt der Waldseilgarten an diesem Programm teil.

Aus diesem Grund würde ich den Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2406796591 mit anderen Access Tags versehen.

Solltest Du andere Informationen haben, dann sag bitte bescheid.
woodpeck (2016-03-22 23:44:26+00:00): This looks like an undiscussed import. I can't find anything about this on the Wiki; many objects have strange, unusual tags ("gm_type"), and it is unclear if "Hargeisa District map" is a legal source! There are a couple other similar changesets nearby. I fear that it will be necessary to remove them.
look4book (2018-08-05 19:42:52+00:00): Wie sieht denn ein Enforcement für ein maxweight aus? Steht da eine Waage mit Kamera? :-) Vielleicht genügt hier ein "maxweight=x" am highway?
projecter63 (2018-08-06 11:44:35+00:00): Das ist eine stationäre Schüttgutwaage für Lkw's - gut zu erkennen auf den aktuellen Bing-Luftbildern. Sie wird vermutlich primär dem Zweck dienen, das Gewicht der Ladung für die Lieferscheine zu ermitteln, sekundär aber auch, um eine Überladung des Fahrzeuges bzw. ein Überschreiten der zul. Achslasten zu vermeiden. Damit entspricht sie dem OSMwiki für enforcement - Stichwort: LKW-Waage.
Die roles 'from' & 'to' sind hier unpassend, da die Waage von beiden Richtungen aus angefahren werden kann. Und: nein, eine Kamera gibt es hier nicht. Ist aber lt. OSMwiki auch nicht zwingend erforderlich. 
Sollte also passen ...
Grüße
projecter63
aceman444 (2015-05-17 19:15:18+00:00): Hi, what does oneway=bicycle mean on the bicycle paths that you edited in this changeset? The joining cycleways have oneway=yes.
MichaelK (2015-05-27 00:32:31+00:00): IIRC I didn't change the tagging of the bicycle paths, they have just been influenced by other changes (eg crossing ways). => please have a closer look to changeset. BTW: the chaneset was a year ago => very hard to remember such old changes!
BTW: oneway = yes is a clear tagging which says that it's a oneway. And: that's IMHO normal to a bicycle path if it's related to a road which is also oneway. If you drive it in the opposite direction you will AFAIK get a ticket by the police.
aceman444 (2015-05-31 14:15:02+00:00): The point of my question is that there is no "oneway=yes" in the tags. There is a "oneway=bicycle" tag which I do not understand. So either it should be changed to "oneway=yes" for all traffic, or "oneway:bicycle=yes" so that only bikes must go one way.
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-13 19:18:06+00:00): What's the rationale for marking these roads as tertiary?  It seems counterintuitive to have a road that is limited to bus traffic marked as tertiary.
Grant Humphries (2015-09-14 21:38:24+00:00): I suppose I went with tertiary because these streets represent somewhat important connections between different areas of the city.  I wouldn't be opposed to them being changed to unclassified if you think that's more appropriate
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-14 23:30:27+00:00): If you search for "busway" on the main OSM site, it looks like most of the results are highway=service.
Grant Humphries (2015-09-14 23:35:43+00:00): I don't necessarily have a problem with that, but if you look at the description of 'service' on the 'highway' key page on the wiki it doesn't really seem like a match to the conditions of these roads:

"For access roads to, or within an industrial estate, camp site, business park, car park etc."

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-16 16:29:21+00:00): We might as well leave it as-is.  It doesn't really fit exactly with any of the highway classes.  After poking around I did find some other bus-only roads in North America that are marked highway=tertiary.
mtmail (2015-07-22 01:02:39+00:00): The tag 'aeroway=Tinshack's notes' and the 'history' tags looks like a copy&paste error on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2888377577
Tinshack (2015-07-22 09:40:01+00:00): Nah - that was my way of keeping track of what I did on a very large changeset.  I meant to delete it before upload.
CloCkWeRX (2016-10-15 10:45:29+00:00): Strava user report - "Geen doorgaande weg (ook voor fietsers)" for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6869718 - but I'm not really sure if that means access private or something else. Do you happen to know?
Sander H (2016-10-15 14:54:06+00:00): No idea, I only cleaned up an old tag on this road that originated from the AND import in 2006 while performing the BAG import cleanup steps in this area. Maybe it's better to add a note so that local mappers can check.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-11-08 08:01:08+00:00): w widłach Wisły i Sanu, a nie Sanoku :-)
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-11-08 08:02:03+00:00): O tę tablicę chodzi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1809495542
stefanct (2020-12-27 15:20:21+00:00): Hi, wie kommst du darauf, dass genau dieses Haus (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7352054) Wanzenöd heißt? Du hast das vor 6 Jahren mal angelegt in diesem Changeset (damals noch auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285208954). Wanzenöd ist meines Wissens nach die Bezeichnung für die Siedlung, siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2509860486
eggie (2019-09-14 19:11:32+00:00): Buiten Nederland begonnen met mappen en daarom nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog  Welkom bij OpenStreetMap Nederland. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
HubMiner (2017-10-03 13:11:39+00:00): Hi, I wanted to link this route 37 to something official, but didn't see anything online except this https://www.adventurecycling.org/default/assets/File/USBRS/USBR37IllinoisMap.pdf
Do you have any other references?
stevea (2017-10-03 18:28:50+00:00): Yes, I used the Illinois Department of Transportation's application to AASHTO.  It is a nine page document with maps and route descriptors (turns and lengths).  I can send it to you if as an attachment if you give me an email address.  -SteveA
HubMiner (2017-10-05 02:34:31+00:00): Hi, I was hoping for something online. Perhaps a Wikipedia page will get created one.  Thanks for getting back!
stevea (2017-10-05 03:07:33+00:00): Try here:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/idtfhretq0urelu/AADNm6RwNePgBHKkKZphkYMja?dl=0

and click the USBR 37 IL link.

Cheers, SteveA.
HubMiner (2017-10-05 13:07:18+00:00): I double you want me to link OSM to your private Dropbox... :)  Any change you want to create a wiki page for the route, based on docs you have?
stevea (2017-10-05 17:44:06+00:00): By "double" I think you mean "doubt" and by "change" do you mean "chance?"

I might suggest you download the doc which I generously point you to and do whatever you need to do with it.

I believe my part of helping you is complete.
stevea (2017-10-05 20:12:08+00:00): BTW, there is a wiki page for the whole USBRS (system), where each route is listed.  There are no links to the "originating documentation" for (AASHTO) approved routes, but there are links for the ballots for the routes that are proposed at any given time.

See https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/WikiProject_U.S._Bicycle_Route_System
HubMiner (2017-10-12 01:43:20+00:00): Hi, thanks again for proving the info.  I reviewed the documents and the wiki osm page.  Unfortunately I don't feel I have enough historical and high general info to put together a wikipedia page myself.  Perhaps something will become available at a later time.  Thanks for your help.
stevea (2017-10-12 01:49:10+00:00): You are welcome.  Although I don't quite understand what it is that you are either missing or that you require to further complete whatever it is that you are trying to do.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-03 17:34:31+00:00): I'm guessing http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285292116 is a barrier=fence?
dudone (2016-07-04 18:32:06+00:00): Yes.  Corrected.

Regard

Dudley
d1g (2015-03-29 07:17:38+00:00): Какой к чёрту "Астраханская улица, дом 88к2"???

Ты хоть чем-то это объяснить это можешь? Таблички дома? Лицензия? Текст постановления?
d1g (2015-03-29 07:19:33+00:00): Выписка из БТИ? Паспорт?
giggls (2017-12-17 16:56:37+00:00): Hello,

does this bridge exist or not?
AlexC (2017-12-17 16:57:34+00:00): Bridge exists now.
giggls (2017-12-17 17:02:27+00:00): Can you please fix the tagging then? I just stumbled upon this because routing did not use the bridge.
AlexC (2017-12-17 17:25:47+00:00): Already done so, thanks for finding it.
utack (2019-11-24 22:40:00+00:00): Hi,  
could you have a look at this?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2007347  
It seems like you know the area.  
Thank you!
locke (2019-11-26 08:48:30+00:00): Hi,
I have been there some years ago but not recently, as I am from Germany. So I cannot help you in that issue.
But even looking at street view I am not sure about the routing of the cycle track.
Regards
locke (2019-11-26 12:17:52+00:00): Just had a closer look at some mapillary pictures. To me the cycle track coming from south connects to the parking area following the s-shaped path. From there a small link path exists to the newly built cycleway next to the highway and further along Hemo Road. It doesn't seem to follow the way along the parking area of Te Puia.
CloCkWeRX (2016-11-05 10:56:48+00:00): Do you happen to know the surface of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243064597 ? From a strava user note: there is a route but it is not a official road more like a farm track and unsuitable for road bikes
bigalxyz123 (2016-11-05 11:13:08+00:00): Hi - I had a look on Google Street View at both ends of the route. It's a narrow farm road but has a good surface. I've added it as a service road, but with the original footpath way still there in the same place. I'm never quite sure - with public footpaths that are also roads - what the best way to represent them in OSM is. Do you know anything about this?

Thanks.
CloCkWeRX (2016-11-07 08:03:21+00:00): Track can be a good compromise in that case.
utack (2016-04-07 21:55:16+00:00): Could you have a look at
www.openstreetmap.org/node/2890308032
please.
On the bing images it seems a tiny bit off.
Cheers
Endres Pelka (2014-11-10 11:47:43+00:00): Vandalism, I'm reverting.
hackthemap (2020-09-13 14:38:50+00:00): Hey kaltuna :)
I know this is an old edit, but if you are not aware, the tagging for a Packstation according to the wiki should be (at least nowadays):
amenity=vending_machine
vending=parcel_pickup;parcel_mail_in
operator=DHL
ref=packstation_number
no name=*
packstation_type=cabinet (type could conflict with type in a relation and is not as clear)
surveillance=outdoor or indoor (all packstation have a camera)

I already changed the tagging with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90821707

Best,
hackthemap
kaltuna (2020-09-14 03:46:35+00:00): Thanks vor the iÍnfo. In 2014 the scheme for a Packstation was not yet defined as clear.
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-08-31 11:28:35+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53821342 - is it real proposal? If not - it should be deleted.

If it exists - proposed=yes should be gone.

If it seriously proposed - please use rather highway=proposed, proposed=footway
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-08-31 11:28:47+00:00): see also http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/425635
alphensebezorger (2016-02-14 16:28:51+00:00): Hier is een "way" zonder tags gemaakt rondom het Natuurvriendenhuis. Daar moet vast nog een tag aan vast, maar welke?
rza31 (2016-05-02 09:09:21+00:00): Hallo MichaH,

die Leerungszeiten der von dir eingetragenen Briefkästen haben nicht den korrekten Syntax. siehe: http://www.netzwolf.info/osm/time_domain/map_collection?zoom=13&lat=50.0963&lon=8.69248&layers=B0T

Gruß rza31
MichaH (2016-05-02 16:39:29+00:00): Nun dann mach einen Bugreport bei Vespucci auf, denn das ist das Format das Vespucci vorgeschlagen hat. Ich habe nur die Zeiten angepasst.
ivanbranco (2024-03-21 00:08:32+00:00): Hi ribbon, I know it's a 10 years old edit, but I see you are still active so maybe you know how to answer this fixme? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2891439550
naoliv (2015-07-09 23:55:04+00:00): Cruzeirense, de onde você obteve o nome das rodovias?
O que você utilizou para inserir os nomes?
naoliv (2016-06-29 14:29:00+00:00): Cruzeirense, que programa você utilizou nessa edição?
naoliv (2015-07-09 23:55:37+00:00): Cruzeirense, de onde você obteve o nome das rodovias?
O que você utilizou para inserir os nomes?
philippec (2022-03-04 22:19:08+00:00): Beerzelberg.
Zou het niet beter zijn de peak op het hoogste punt te zetten ?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2792876721025240
pnorman (2015-07-21 01:04:35+00:00): You've indicated Google is the source for this as well as another changeset. Unfortunately, Copyright and Google's terms don't let us take their data or use their products.

Paul Norman
For the Data Working Group
DeBigC (2020-10-12 20:53:02+00:00): The buildings here are all numbered 93, and neither represent size, shape or number of what I see in the satellite imagery. Maybe a quick review, assuming the area may have changed would be worth it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-09 18:57:22+00:00): "name"="St.miejskie" wygląda mi na pomyłkę - to chyba do opisu powinno trafić.
Geofreund1 (2020-07-27 14:40:55+00:00): Hallo Nakaner,
du hast seinerzeit hier einen Bahnübergang entfernt. Leider hängt der serviceway auf dem Bahngelände jetzt in der Luft. Ist der gar nicht mehr zugänglich oder wie ist er jetzt an das übrige Straßennetz angebunden?
Nakaner (2020-07-27 15:25:09+00:00): Hallo,

der Bahnübergang ist durch den Abbau des Bahnübergangs nicht mehr zugänglich. Mir war das Schaffen einer Routinginsel damals bewusst. Das scheint aber im Rahmen des Um- und Teilrückbaus des Güterbahnhofs Roßlau Absicht zu sein, da es keine Anlagen mit Anschlussbedarf an das Straßennetz dort mehr geben wird und  das Stellwerk direkt an der Straßenüberführung Streetzer Weg im Rahmen des Umbaus entfällt (Ersatz durch elektronisches Stellwerk an anderer Stelle, wahrscheinlich fernbedient aus Leipzig) und das alte Stellwerk, soweit ich mich erinnere, einen Zugang von der Brücke aus haben könnte.

Ich schlage daher vor, das Straßenstück als disused:highway=* zu erfassen. Es wird vermutlich nach und nach zuwachsen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Geofreund1 (2020-07-27 21:04:08+00:00): Ich hab' es mal provisorisch als disused vermerkt. Werd' es mir demnächst mal vor Ort anschauen.
Danke
Geofreund1
Nakaner (2020-07-27 21:36:19+00:00): Hallo,

du kannst noch einen Blick auf https://baustellen-doku.info/ werfen. Die Seite hat hübsche Bildergalerien v.a. von Bahnbaustellen aus Mitteldeutschland und wir dürfen ihre Fotos sogar für OSM als Quelle nutzen.

https://baustellen-doku.info/dessau-rosslau_bahnknoten/umbau-bahnhof-rosslau/20200510/

Bild 28 zeigt die Ostseite des ehemaligen Bahnübergangs. Dieser war direkt neben der Hilfsbrücke des Streetzer Wegs und hatte deshalb eine Höhenbegrenzung von 4 Meter. Bild 32 zeigt den Blick von der Brücke auf Höhe des ehemaligen Stellwerks Richtung Waldstraße 1 (so nenne ich mal behelfsweise das Gebäude, das er "Beamtenwohnhaus" nennt). Seine Bildunterschrift ist eindeutig. Der Bahnübergang wird bald endgültig überflüssig, wenn alle Züge durch den Güterbahnhof fahren und die zwei Gleise auf der Ostseite der Vergangenheit angehören.

Wenn ich darüber nachdenke, dass die Bauarbeiten begannen, als ich diesen Änderungssatz angelegt habe, …

Viele Grüße

Michael
ClémentVialle (2015-10-16 13:03:57+00:00): Ola Wille! tudo bem? Estou trabalhando nestas questões de limites "barrier" para questôes urbanisticas...
Acredito que neste caso seria barrier=fence ou estou enganado? abs!
aharvey (2018-11-15 13:15:03+00:00): Hey, in this change you added Mirang Road Fire Trail from the highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285602681, an armchair mapper since changed this to Eckersley Road, can you confirm if Mirang Road Fire Trail does infact start from the highway or not?
miroslavuzice87 (2018-11-15 14:29:07+00:00): Greetings aharvey. The Eckersley Road was already connected to the left side of Princes Highway, I just connected it to the right side, because on the satellite image it is visible that both sides of the road are connected and it can be turned to the other side, as seen on the Mapillary.
Zhent (2018-11-16 08:51:40+00:00): It was a while ago, I can't recall. NSW LPI Basemap says Eckersley so will go with that till I visit there again.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-07 09:57:40+00:00): Just checking - is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285616183 really named "Tunbridge Wells Circular Link Route"?  It's already part of http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3788347 ("Tunbridge Wells Circular Walk (Speldhurst Link)").  If it doesn't have its own, separate name there's no need to create one for OpenStreetMap.
naoliv (2014-11-29 13:42:17+00:00): Otávio, você adicionou um monte de variação do nome da Rua Doutor Antônio Bento. Isso não é necessário (e nem correto). Deve-se utilizar apenas o nome completo da rua, sem abreviações.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-27 15:12:19+00:00): Proszę poprawnie tagować adresy: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
A piszę ponieważ w miejscowości Świdnik trochę kombinowałeś: http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=2893758880
Pozdrawiam
chris66 (2019-05-11 08:03:39+00:00): Nautic Jet meiner Meinung nach an falscher Position gemappt.
vogelfreier (2019-05-12 18:30:52+00:00): Nach ÜBER 5 Jahren kommst Du da mit an. Nach Esri-Luftbilder kann durchaus die Position stimmen.
Da dieser Park für mich völlig unerrreichbar ist ohne Auto, bin ich da außen vor, ob die Daten stimmen, bzw. aktual sind.
luschi (2015-08-21 20:40:52+00:00): embankment=yes setzt man nicht auf Wiesen. Wenn überhaupt kommt es auf Straßen und Wege.
Bitte ändere das, da du am ehesten weißt wo überall du diesen tag verwendet hast.
lg
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-14 09:29:28+00:00): Wypadałoby kalibrować podkład binga przed rysowaniem czegokolwiek.
Warin61 (2017-02-07 02:44:40+00:00): I am adding a few tracks in the Bargo State Forest. Way 285828624 - part of the Hume & Hovel ... looks to be a little off the LPI Base map location? So my question is .. what is your source for the entry .. and should I replace it with the LIP data?
jeka p (2016-11-19 16:43:01+00:00): Привіт!
я позначив медичний центр:
amenity=clinic
і додав інформацію
daniconil (2019-02-21 10:48:54+00:00): Este punto está desactualizado, la dirección de Autonomía Sur Cooperativa Andaluza es c/ Otto Engelhardt, 3, bajo, 41004 Sevilla.
aceman444 (2015-01-12 20:29:43+00:00): Hi, this change seems to be incorrect. Guernesey seems to be the French name for the island, while Guernsey is the Brittish one. The Island belong to Brittain so probably the Brittish version should be in "name" tag. You can put Guernesey in name:fr. However, you only changed part of the coastline to this name so that looks incomplete or useless. See relation 1711291 . Please fix it, thanks.
gormur (2016-07-27 14:56:01+00:00): Kraftverk og rørgate ble duplisert med dette changeset-et.
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-02-03 02:26:10+00:00): Hi Eihwaz,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/285940009) and I also made some changes around this changeset. Thank you.
SomeoneElse (2018-01-06 18:01:54+00:00): Hello,
Just wondered about the "embankment=yes" tag on the River Clyst http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285944892 .  Is it "on an embankment" or does it "have embankments either side of it"?  I'm currently trying to render the "embankment" tag for waterways.  For highways and railways it's obvious (it means "on an embankment") but here's it's not so clear.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_1232595 (2014-11-15 20:30:52+00:00): Einige refs an secondary wurden mit runden Klammern eingetragen, Beispiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255759325 -> ref = "(B 32)".
War das so beabsichtigt? Spricht etwas dagegen, diese Klammern wieder zu entfernen?
Warin61 (2017-06-13 23:44:25+00:00): Hi,
Node: 2896942815 "man_made"="windmill" does not appear in bing imagery. Is this still here? I have retagged it as windpump to match current OSM tagging. But .. has it been removed?
pnorman (2017-10-12 21:15:37+00:00): Hello,

this changeset seems to have added non-English names as name:en, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2897172697

Also, I can't see any information about the license of the data on wikiloc.com, just a (C) 老瓦 All rights reserved. Where's the license found?
katpatuka (2017-10-18 04:43:42+00:00): I can only point you to https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2010-May/050017.html .

If that is not enough redact my edits having "wikiloc" tagged changeset comments of the last 7 years.
silversurfer83 (2024-08-13 12:36:51+00:00): Moin :)
sehe grad, dass du dem Gesamtgebäude der Kirche hier die Höhe Null gegeben hast. War das Absicht? Muss das so, wenn die Gebäudeteile eigene Höhenangaben haben? Und warum ist der Turm zweigeteil?

(sorry, viele Fragen. Versuche nur das Gebäude zu verstehen)

Grüße
silversurfer83
naoliv (2017-07-14 12:51:56+00:00): Provavelmente não vai responder também, mas o que você utilizou para obter os nomes de rua daqui, por favor?
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-05-11 11:45:55+00:00): Hi! I notice you've changed some of the railways so that they are tagged `historic=Chesapeake and Ohio Railway`, but that's not the correct usage of the `historic` tag, right? What are you trying to map here? Is the old name "Chesapeake and Ohio Railway" or something?
GerdP (2015-12-10 12:25:59+00:00): Hi there!
Please, can you explain why you need a highway=water ? If I got that right, you added this way to calm down OSM inspector? That looks not like a good idea to me.
GerdP (2015-12-10 12:26:50+00:00): Sorry, forgot the link to the way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286236733
GerdP (2016-02-05 10:32:57+00:00): If there is no real road named Vågavågen,
I guess the addr:street=Vågavågen is simply wrong. Maybe it is better to use addr:place=Vågavågen or remove it ?
gormur (2016-02-05 16:09:07+00:00): Yeah.
There is no road named Vågavågen, perhaps a path at best, but certainly no named street.
Vågavågen is the name of the bay next to the adresses.
But the adresses are correct. They come from the official (very accurate) norwegian adress register (legal source, imported).
What is wrong here is the highway=water tag that obviously was a hack. If anything, that tag is the one that should be removed. After all, it is just to mute some inspectors that can perfectly well be ignored.
Regarding addr:place: I can see the idea, but I personally don't like it. It just makes it harder to keep the adresses updated and harder for data consumers to use them.

If you want to remove the highway=water, I won't be offended :)
GerdP (2016-02-05 17:05:29+00:00): OK, did that, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37024141
eggie (2017-09-13 15:53:31+00:00): Opnieuw-welkom gestuurd per PB