stevea (2019-04-25 23:17:48+00:00): No.  Just as you don't like private missives more widely discussed, I do not discuss private missives where consensus was reached, or however it may have been achieved, that is what documenting consensus on wiki does.  I owe you nothing, especially after my sincere efforts to communicate with you resulted in every single one (I mean EVERY SINGLE ONE) of your replies to me (even as you initiate new ones!) as bad-mouthing, insults, baiting/provoking, abuse or all of the above.  I have extended patience with you and all it gets me is your rancorous spew.  This is the very definition of a troll does.

Your "it's odd you'd forgo it here to add something that's clearly wrong" is not only presumptuous and inflammatory, it is for those reasons at least, abusive.  You likely aren't aware you even do this, but that a serious problem you have.  Not a problem has OSM with you, yet we may remedy that by asking you to either change or leave.  The first question you ask is abusive:  it smacks (heavily) of accusatory tone (nonsensically) when it has no need to do so.  Your second question is the same.  Is possible to not say "you, you, you..." and "your obvious hypocrisy" and "your (you're) just wrong" so much?  These are inflammatory.  In 50 words or less, all of them strung together rise to the level of "verbal abuse," especially when they echo similar tone over 100% of your communications to me.  I've had enough; this is exhausting.  It appears there are no changes in Adamant1 for the better ahead, as I doubt there is any realization (though not on my part) how far he has to go to perform simple, civil, adult, productive dialog towards collaboration.  With virtually everybody else here, I collaborate.  With Adamant1, I feel forced to constantly defend myself against spurious accusations and back-pedaled nonsensical word salad.  No more.

Report me all you want.  I'm fine, you're in the doghouse.  OSM isn't a game, it's a project.  Project yourself into it well (or don't, as is your seemingly only behavior).

In short, shut up and map.  If you engage in civil dialog, something which I have repeatedly entreated you to do (with 100% failure on your part), I will respond in kind.  But it is because you continually put me (and virtually all others in this project with which you attempt to communicate) on the defensive — a sad tactic I usually see in children, yet I have also seen in personality-disordered adults, and one most everybody sees here), I will cease trying to convey to you what are acceptable and unacceptable forms of discourse here, as you either fail to listen to these, fail to implement them or fail to develop your own communication method which isn't inflammatory.  I won't even wish you "good luck" any more, even though I believe you desperately need it.  As well as courage, perseverance and discipline.

"Giving me one more chance" made me laugh out loud, it is so ridiculous.  Your actions (in the map) speak much more loudly than your word salad.  So, map.  Or contribute to wiki.  Or reach consensus with others and map even better.  Or all of the above.  But stop directing your verbal diarrhea at me already, please.  As others notice me not defending myself at Adamant1's spurious, false attacks, he should crawl back into shatever corner from which he wriggled up from.  I choose to engage less, less, and finally, not at all.  Disparagement continuing from him, included.