piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tux67 (2016-06-03 15:12:45+00:00): Die Unterbrechnung des Sechseichenweges ust jetz gefixt. Was mich hier irritiert ist, daß wir jetzt 2 Wege haben, die aus Osten auf die Kreuzung zu laufen: Der Reitweg und der Sechseichenweg. Ist das vor Ort so?
Huhu der Zweite (2016-06-03 15:20:47+00:00): Es ist auf jeden Fall ein mit dem Rad befahrbarer Weg (ca. 5m breit) und ein Reitweg geht dann ab. Der Reitweg ist nur schwer als solcher auszumachen, aber meiner Meinung nach ist das jetzt so richtig an der Stelle.
Der Reitweg geht vereinzelt eigentlich bis zum Parkplatz Sechseichenweg. aber auch der ist sehr schwer zu erkennen.
Wichtig war mir nur der Radweg, damit die Routen korrekt geplant werden können.
vng_me (2017-12-25 08:52:31+00:00): А почему здесь тег tourism=theme_park?
Аналогично и про эту ноду: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4223734098
Alexey_ND (2017-12-28 11:43:25+00:00): ??? 
Это было более года назад.
Предлагаю просто править неточности.
43 и 52-й я подправил.
EIjas (2016-06-11 12:32:49+00:00): Добрый день!

Поясните, пожалуйста, запрет левого поворота с Лиговского на Обводный. Он разрешен.
Также Вы создали дубликат ребра по Обводному каналу.
Dinamik (2016-06-11 13:44:46+00:00): Здравствуйте! Я посмотрел: через неделю после меня перекрёсток правил другой участник - вероятно, он и склеил рёбра. Поворот с набережной Обводного канала я не запрёщал, я запрещал разворот при движении по Лиговскому проспекту.
user_242798 (2016-09-24 08:56:29+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley
An alley or alleyway is a narrow service road usually located between properties to provide access things such as back gardens, rear entrances, fire exits, and storage areas. Alleys are normally found in urban areas, and often run between the rear sides of buildings such as houses, and commercial premises. 
Bedrijventerrein Bombaak > [service=alley] is incorrect > [service=driveway]
gileri (2016-06-06 18:20:52+00:00): Bonjour,

Je pense qu'il serait intéressant de citer en temps que source quelle note a permis quelle modification.

Pour éviter de faire un changeset par note, il est possible d'ajouter source=https://openstreetmap.org/note/XXX aux entités modifiées à l'aide de notes.
literan (2016-06-03 14:09:10+00:00): как же вы так плохорисуете, что у вас стоянка на школу залезла, а посередине забор проходит :-( Откачу ка я вашу правку, т.к. это ни в какие ворота не годится, в проекте приветствуется аккуратность, а не тяп-ляп
marczoutendijk (2016-06-04 15:59:39+00:00): Er zit een klein foutje in je toevoeging: "description=Openbare basischool" moet je vervangen door amenity=school, dan wordt het ook zichtbaar als school. Lees ook mijn welkomstmail!
chnav (2016-06-04 06:30:48+00:00): У нас серьёзный проект, пожалуйста не хулиганьте. Все туалеты удалил.
GerdP (2017-08-29 05:43:41+00:00): Hi!
I've found the typo highway=footway
on several ways in this changeset.
Did you mean path or footway?
See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/rjC
R0bst3r (2017-08-29 07:26:31+00:00): Das angesprochene Tag ist "highway=footpath". Gewünscht war wohl highway=footway?
wuff57 (2017-08-29 09:52:00+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out. Was a typo. I've just changed all 6 occurences to highway=footway
przemas75 (2016-08-27 10:31:43+00:00): Co to znaczy 'access=no'? Co to za droga?
Hjart (2016-06-03 14:16:17+00:00): Du er velkommen til at tage sagen op på vores postliste.
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-05 15:15:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40501812 where the changeset comment is: Revert suspected copying from copyrighted data source after no reply received in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39688528
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-28 07:45:47+00:00): what kinds of remains remain from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4223860456/history ?

Or is this specific trig point fully gone without any traces whatsoever?

(Felixturm is a separate object, right?)
DGerveno (2016-08-10 08:35:28+00:00): name:ar es el sufijo para árabe, no aragonés. En ese caso sería name:an, que ya existe como etiqueta
ansuta (2016-08-10 18:28:01+00:00): Gracias por la aclaración. Lo corregiré tan pronto como pueda. Saludos
DGerveno (2016-08-10 18:31:54+00:00): No hace falta. Estoy terminando una revisión de todos los términos de Huesca y sus cabeceras, incluyendo el nombre en lengua propia de cada uno, por lo que éste ha quedado corregido. Un saludo.
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-05 15:15:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40501812 where the changeset comment is: Revert suspected copying from copyrighted data source after no reply received in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39688528
scai (2016-06-03 16:26:41+00:00): Warum wurde denn der Vermessungspunkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2774644929 gelöscht, noch dazu ohne jeglichen Kommentar?
lutz (2016-06-03 16:32:03+00:00): Er wurde nicht gelöscht, sondern mit dem Denkmal vereinigt:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/565539934#map=19/50.92088/13.74981&layers=D

Es ist ein Objekt, was zweimal gemappt wurde...

Grüße von Lutz
scai (2016-06-03 17:00:04+00:00): Alles klar, danke für die schnelle Aufklärung. Die Verwendung sinnvoller Changeset-Kommentare hätte es einfacher gemacht das zu erkennen :)
Warin61 (2017-05-20 00:10:58+00:00): name= should be in the local language ONLY 
Other languages can be added using name:ru=* where ru is a 2 letter language code for the language in use.
Sarvihepo (2016-08-09 17:08:12+00:00): Thanks for your edits but the proper placing for the city is addr:city key. Also, please avoid names ending in whitespace as they don't pass validation.
Supaplex (2016-06-03 17:01:57+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Happy Mapping!
pyram (2016-06-05 21:31:11+00:00): Ich habe die Änderung wieder rückgängig gemacht. (MP erforderlich)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/584604#map=18/47.88021/10.62144
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-05 15:15:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40501812 where the changeset comment is: Revert suspected copying from copyrighted data source after no reply received in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39688528
mavl (2019-03-23 16:27:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:27:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:27:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
idahj (2016-08-30 16:41:35+00:00): Hi,
I see you deleted an existing footpath in the Kelvingrove Park, the path passing by the playground. I see you used old town plans as image source. As this path was not in the original plans from 1894, it does not have the footpath you deleted on it, I guess that is why. It is a good idea to use updated imagery sources. Also, in a city such as Glasgow, new things are made all the time, so sometimes even Bing is not up to date. Imagery is therefore not always a good source for deletions, and it might be an idea to check the site itself. I will re-map the path.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:27:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:27:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:27:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:27:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Rhys Howell (2016-06-07 15:50:31+00:00): The name in EN is wrong lol. It's Koblenz, not Coblenz.
utack (2016-06-07 15:52:35+00:00): According to Wiki:
Koblenz (German: Koblenz German pronunciation: [ˈkoːblɛnt͡s] ( listen)), also spelled Coblenz (English and pre-1926 German spelling) or Coblence

I will fix it and use it as alt_name:en, thanks for the hint
Rhys Howell (2016-06-07 15:56:49+00:00): Yup, the French spelt it with a C. Complex history here. It's even on some old signs but the Germans are very much in favour of the K as it's more German and the English is the same name (on this occasion). I know us Brits like to give everything else a different name :) Cheers for fast response.
utack (2016-06-07 15:57:50+00:00): Thanks for checking what I did here, more eyes are always better
SimonPoole (2016-08-07 09:02:10+00:00): Thurgovia is -not- the English name of the Canton Thurgau, please correct. You in general you shouldn't confuse names invented for marketing purposes, typically derived from pseudo-Latin names as the real thing.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Gumeg (2016-11-29 08:53:46+00:00): Добрый день!
Я знаю, что БМРТ занимается производством запчастей, а не продажей машины, поэтому для этого подходит тег shop=car_parts на точке, а не shop=car, как у вас. У низ в этом месте есть розничный магазин? Из MAPS.ME очень удобно тогда можно проставить время работы.
maraf24 (2016-06-03 19:51:21+00:00): Reverted.
maraf24 (2017-04-26 20:19:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16128049
Tu jest dwukierunkowy pas rowerowy? Aktualne otagowanie pozwala na ruch tylko w jedną stronę.
T-Keks (2016-06-03 17:06:24+00:00): Ich verstehe das nicht. Warum wird immer der Titel meiner vorherigen Änderung angezeigt... :-(
MKnight (2016-06-03 19:27:45+00:00): wahrscheinlich, weil Du vergisst, den Titel zu ändern.
poornibadrinath (2016-06-06 07:59:53+00:00): Hi @yurasi, 
  The satellite imagery clearly shows the track being present there. Is there any particular reason of why have you deleted it. 
http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#39783461

Best,
Poornima Badrinath
poornibadrinath (2016-06-08 10:13:34+00:00): Hi @yurasi
  The road which has been deleted looks like it has been traced recently. There are all chances that the road exists and the satellite imagery has not been updated to the recent years. Hence it would be better if you would revert the changes you did. 

Best, 
 Poornima Badrinath
ozhiker2 (2018-04-16 15:57:09+00:00): Hi InputMan,
You may like to comment on the note at this location (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1362020)
Regards,
Evan
maraf24 (2016-06-03 19:53:26+00:00): Reverted.
Warin61 (2016-08-22 04:42:35+00:00): Way 422672861 tagged as 'building=yes' should be only on the building footprint - not the property boundaries. 
Node 4224101948 has many tags the same as the above way ... so it is an unwanted repetition.
schleuss (2016-07-02 17:42:06+00:00): Thanks for adding this! I flew here a few times when I was a child. Cool to see it recently added to the map!
GerdP (2017-08-28 10:44:17+00:00): Hi!
Nach meinem Verständnis sollte der Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48560053
mit highway=path + ford=stepping_stones 
erfaßt werden.
SomeoneElse (2016-06-11 17:09:53+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Edits that you make update the one shared map that everyone sees. That's why it's important that only valid edits are made to the map. If you want to experiment with a test API, you can do so over at http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org (an exact copy of the main site apart from the map display).
Johnny Mapperseed (2016-06-14 06:23:47+00:00): Is the road connecting to this a major highway? (Equivalent to the nearby Southeast Expressway)

It seems like this is a new development, so do you perhaps have a GPS Trace you could upload to confirm the position of the road?

Thank you for your contribution!
meganmorrison (2016-06-14 17:22:33+00:00): Hi Johnny - what's the best way to upload?
meganmorrison (2016-06-14 17:24:17+00:00): Here is a link to the file of the map image: https://www.dropbox.com/s/0p9at06owbgjibd/Saddle%20Creek%20Address%20notice.pdf?dl=0
Johnny Mapperseed (2016-06-14 17:42:15+00:00): Thank you for your help! 

If you want to upload a trace you can do it here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/traces
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
AkuAnakTimur (2016-06-04 06:21:52+00:00): Wonky changeset - this post office should be in Alor Setar, not Ipoh.

I will rectify this later.
skquinn (2019-12-20 20:51:47+00:00): Please note that the turn:lanes (and turn:lanes:*) tags by themselves do not convey lane count information and need to be supplemented by lanes (and lanes:*). You may want to look at the turnlanes-tagging plugin to help automate the task of adding turn lanes; it has presets for some of the most common situations.
naoliv (2016-06-07 20:47:35+00:00): Dancandido, não crie "proibido retornar" quando a rua de origem e de destino for a mesma (ou seja, criar uma restrição de retorno na própria rua). Isso é desnecessário e errado de se fazer.
highflyer74 (2016-06-07 11:23:38+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52203514 and try to change tags according to wiki. If you have questions, let me know, or check the OSM forums.

All the best,

highflyer74
dieterdreist (2016-06-24 16:35:12+00:00): is the name really "Casalle" and not "Casale"? Is this really a hotel and not a B&B / Agriturismo? The hotel is really called "Entrance to Agr. La Casella"? Please do not abbreviate.
dieterdreist (2016-06-24 16:47:08+00:00): I have now removed the "entrance" that was tagged as hotel but really is just a crossroads and refined the other tagging, including refining the hotel to agriturismo tags
user_5359 (2016-06-04 05:36:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Beaurob (2016-06-04 05:41:55+00:00): Ok gotcha. Thanks for the tip. Do I need to correct it?
user_5359 (2016-06-04 05:59:45+00:00): I have done some works. Please wait some minutes, the map will be updated in some minutes.
AgusQui (2016-08-14 18:25:23+00:00): Esta Esso ya no existe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2123271466
AgusQui (2016-08-14 18:59:39+00:00): Esta era PDV, pero ahora es Rhasa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2547544232
ignaciolep (2016-08-14 23:19:23+00:00): Gracias Agus!
MichaOSM (2016-06-03 19:45:17+00:00): Bitte nicht einfach Eigenschaften löschen, sondern im Zweifelsfall durch passende ersetzen!
MichaOSM (2016-06-03 19:46:04+00:00): Bitte nicht einfach Eigenschaften löschen, sondern im Zweifelsfall durch passende ersetzen!
Nakaner (2016-06-03 20:47:13+00:00): Das ist aber keine Einschienenbahn und daher Mapping für den Renderer und damit böse.
MichaOSM (2016-06-04 08:10:07+00:00): Und wie nun? Ich habe das Railway ja gar nicht gesetzt, aber so ist die Bahn ganz weg, Highway path, oder highway service gibts wohl auch woanders dafür?
Nakaner (2016-06-04 08:21:46+00:00): OSM Carto, das ist der Kartenstil, mit dem die "Standardkarte" gerendert wird, stellt Sommerrodelbahnen nicht dar. Dennoch ist das kein Grund, irgendein anderes Tag zu taggen, nur damit sie gerendert wird. Das ist Tagging für den Renderer und bei OSM unerwünscht. Ich bitte dich das zu beachten.

Wenn du möchtest, dass OSM Carto diese Bahn rendert, dann melde das bitte als Feature-Request im Github-Projekt von OSM Carto. Dazu benötigst du ein Github-Benutzerkonto. Es kann jedoch Monate dauern, bis man sich deines Wunsches annimmt. https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues
Mathi (2021-11-17 23:06:27+00:00): Hallo!
Wo hast du die Info für den Wanderweg Obercarsdorf-Oberfrauendorf her? Ich war heute da und habe nichts dergleichen gesehen.
kuesa (2021-11-18 20:06:22+00:00): Hallo, 
wahrscheinlich war das Wegstück in Oberfrauendorf eine Fehlinterpretation der damaligen Satelitenaufnahme. Ich habe das entsprechende Stück korrigiert.
chnav (2016-06-04 06:36:17+00:00): У нас серьёзный проект, пожалуйста не хулиганьте. детские площадки удалил.
d1g (2016-06-05 19:21:57+00:00): Road or footway is clearly visible, but we are not sure if this is a motorized road or just a footpath.

It takes time to check all barriers around such roads.

As you can see this part is quite remote from the city, we don't have human resources to check this area for now.
piligab (2016-09-28 14:17:39+00:00): Hi dg1.
I was working on connecting island roads and I think you are right since we need local mappers to confirm the right tags for those roads. Thanks for adding 'fixme' tags so you help us to improve the map.
user_5359 (2016-06-04 05:40:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Andrea Musuruane (2016-06-05 08:22:10+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Ho notato che hai inserito un edificio. Però questo non coincide con le foto satellitari (è decisamente più grande) e ha dei nodi in comune con la strada (questo non va bene). Riesci a dettagliare meglio quanto hai fatto?

Ciao,

Andrea
NicEd (2016-06-12 17:57:24+00:00): Hello, KC225.

Thanks for your first contributions. Please review the rules for mapping, tagging at the Beginners' guide, by clicking on the following link: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide


Best,

NicEd.
Hjart (2016-06-06 18:57:34+00:00): Ups. Det ser ud som du her har slettet et pænt stykke af Ordrupvej (fra Bøgebjergvej og næsten ud til Linderupvej).
Thue Janus Kristensen (2016-06-06 18:59:53+00:00): Erm, ups.
Thue Janus Kristensen (2016-06-06 19:01:32+00:00): Det husker jeg ikke bevidst at have gjort :). Jeg prøver lige om jeg kan tyde OSM's changelog og se hvad der er sket, og hvad der er af revert-funktionalitet.
Hjart (2016-06-06 19:07:30+00:00): Det er lettest at se ved at bruge http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=39787850.
Hjart (2016-06-06 19:10:48+00:00): Du har simpelthen slettet den node hvor hastighedsgrænsen skiftede og så er de nærmeste ender af de to liniestykker smuttet.
Thue Janus Kristensen (2016-06-06 19:10:55+00:00): Ah, tak :).
Thue Janus Kristensen (2016-06-06 19:12:07+00:00): Har du står på at genoprette den node med hastighedsgrænsen? På forhånd tak.
Hjart (2016-06-06 19:13:23+00:00): Det er ok (og langt det nemmeste) bare at lave en ny.
Hjart (2016-06-06 19:18:25+00:00): På den anden side kunne vi også prøve det script der hedder "Restore Version" her: https://github.com/Zverik/simple-revert
Thue Janus Kristensen (2016-06-06 19:21:38+00:00): Jeg har manuelt genoprettet fartgrænsen. Men det er da værd at huske at det script eksisterer. På Wikipedia virker vandalisme ikke fordi det er mere arbejde at vandalisere end at genoprette. Så det er meget overraskende at det tilsyneladende er så uintuitivt at genoprette på OSM.
Hjart (2016-06-06 19:36:34+00:00): Decideret vandalisme er overraskende sjældent i OSM (Jeg kan ikke huske tilfælde i DK fra de seneste 4-5 år). Jeg reverterer jævnligt, men det er langt overvejende begynderfejl). Der er et reverter plugin til JOSM, som jeg sædvanligvis bruger.
Hjart (2016-06-10 08:20:37+00:00): Et eksempel på "vandalisme", som jeg lige har reverteret: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39923266. Bemærk at den slags ikke er almindeligt forekommende. Min revert er http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39923881.
Thue Janus Kristensen (2016-06-10 22:27:49+00:00): Har den danske afdeling af OSM for resten en IRC-kanal?
Hjart (2016-06-11 05:54:51+00:00): "Den danske afdeling af OSM" er ikke andet end en løs gruppering af folk der primært redigerer i DK og fortrinsvist taler dansk :-). Der er en (desværre stærkt forældet) side: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:WikiProject_Denmark, hvor man kan læse om vores postliste og IRC-kanal.
d1g (2016-06-04 00:23:37+00:00): Всё правильно про maxspeed, не совсем подходит он. Некоторые участники используют maxspeed:practical для реальной скорости.

Описание
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:maxspeed:practical
Vas111 (2024-08-14 21:01:43+00:00): Видимо починили дорогу, поставил RU:urban
schoschi (2022-06-21 21:20:44+00:00): Hallo Kurt, es ist schon einige Jahre her, aber erinnerst Du Dich vielleicht noch, aus welcher Motivation Du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422709289 mit area=yes aber ohne weitere Tags eingefügt hast? 🙂 Ich komme nicht darauf, was der Umriss darstellt 🤷‍♂️ Das Gebäude ist kleiner als die Area, der für Besucher zugängliche Teil größer, Burgmauern können es nicht sein weil es die im Nordosten nicht gibt, der Garten als auch highway=* müssten in der Mitte ein Loch haben, etc. Wenn Du auch nicht drauf kommst, sollen wir die area löschen? Viele Grüße, Georg
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-04-08 13:26:57+00:00): Skąd pomysł że na wschodzie Krakowa jest północna obwodnica Krakowa? Czy ktoś używa tej nazwy?

Czy proposed:ref=S52 jest dalej aktualny w 2018?
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
muralito (2016-06-04 21:44:17+00:00): Fabian, OSM no es el lugar para poner datos personales, porque es una base que cualquiera puede ver.
Podes poner direcciones y numeros de puerta, pero no quien vive ahi.
Piskvor (2016-06-06 13:44:55+00:00): There's something actually named "Byt" at that point? If not, I suggest deleting: OSM is not a collection of points "This is where User X lives".
sukic (2016-06-06 20:33:12+00:00): I agree.
dieterdreist (2016-06-24 12:47:40+00:00): the Imperial Forums (in the meantime deleted by another user) had been a duplicate for something already present in much greater detail. The other 2 features are precious contributions, thank you!
smaprs (2016-06-04 02:38:29+00:00): Cómo logró poner el punto http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4224517795 en medio del Atlantico? És más dificil que poner en tierra.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-22 19:46:43+00:00): For info, I've deleted the register office in the middle of the Atlantic.
Para información, he suprimido la oficina de registro en el medio del Atlántico.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
pyram (2016-08-11 22:04:21+00:00): Weil gerade jemand darauf hingewiesen hat:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/667709#map=18/48.86885/8.22912&layers=N

Vorschlag:
highway=proposed
proposed=path
note= geplanter Rad-/Fußweg
maction (2016-09-06 20:06:49+00:00): Okay & Danke!
Ist nun geändert auf:
planned:highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-23 16:28:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
jptolosa (2016-06-05 08:18:00+00:00): You have deleted natural=coastline from shoreline of Isla Látimer and part of Isla Madre de Dios. Now Isla Látimer has disappeared from mapnik rendering and Isla Madre de Dios has been "cutted". I think I said natural=coastline tag only can be used in segments, not in nodes neither relations. The wiki info is clear. Please more careful the next time. And source=PGS should not be shifted from the coastline segment to multipolygon relation.
Regards.
BTH (2016-06-05 09:12:53+00:00): I am sorry, I diid'nt realize I made those deletions. I suppose it was by creating the Bluff Peninsula. I don't know how it could also affect Isla Latimer. How long will it take before those lands appear again ?
Thanks again for checking and fixing my mistakes.