piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tux67 (2018-10-10 07:11:46+00:00): surface=compacted? das sieht für mich aber deutlich nach Asphalt aus. Compacted ist:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=compacted
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63357588
tux67 (2018-10-11 19:44:59+00:00): Ich hab' deine Note gesehen .. wenn du weisst, welcher Untergund das ist, dann solltest du Ihn eintragen. Wenn es sicher ist das es compacted ist - auch gut. Mit dem Link wollte ich nur verdeutichen was "compacted" ist. Wenn's allerdings nicht klar ist, dann am besten erstmal nichts eintragen.
Carnildo (2018-10-09 21:37:42+00:00): This is officially a *right of way*, which is not the same thing as a street.  It's got a line of boulders across it near the Rosamond, and the stretch past the boulders is heavily decayed, with grass growing in the cracks, and decades of dirt and pine needles covering sections of it.

Unbuilt or abandoned right-of-ways are common in the city's larger parks: Manito, Palisades, High Bridge, and Finch Arboretum all have them.  Riverfront Park has the opposite situation: Washington, Stevens, and Post are all built on park property, not public right-of-ways.

It's pretty clear that this *was* the south end of Woodland before I-90 was built, but it was abandoned as part of the freeway construction, probably in the early 1960s.  If it's still on the city's map, it's because nobody's bothered to fill out the paperwork for removing it.
eggie (2018-10-09 20:30:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-10-09 20:32:53+00:00): Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. 
Je verwijdert de details en vervangt deze door een transparant. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse. Je edits zullen worden teruggezet. 
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665
eggie (2018-10-09 20:36:33+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #63359713
eggie (2018-10-09 20:43:02+00:00): De bomen staan er nu ook als voorbeeld. Het gaat juist om de landuse.. Dat kun je dus ook intekenen.
MVG,
eggie
gileri (2018-10-09 20:31:28+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour simplifier les données, les chemins ayant les même tags et ne faisant pas partie de relations particulières sont généralement fusionnés. Exemple :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632293308
et
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632293306
mbethke (2018-10-18 02:05:28+00:00): Hola,
realmente tienes dos restaurantes allí?
geoaria (2018-10-28 15:57:36+00:00): سلام
کاربر عزیز چه نیازی هست که شما جاده فولاد مبارکه را به جاده primary ارتقا دهید.
در ثانی چرا با تغییر درجه راه لینک ها را تغییر نداده اید.

صحیح ادیت کنید . باعث خرابکاری در نقشه نگردید.
eggie (2018-10-09 20:28:50+00:00): Ik heb de landuse residential losgemaakt van je edits. Beter niet iets plakken aan een residential
eggie (2018-10-09 20:35:05+00:00): Je hebt hier de speelplaats gewoon in het water gemapt. Klopt het dan wel?
eggie (2018-10-09 20:38:07+00:00): aangepast
Nmxosm (2018-11-29 07:25:41+00:00): Hallo undsoweiter,

ist es Absicht, dass du in diesem Änderungssatz https://osm.org/way/632300601 so veränderst, dass das Gebäude nicht mehr rechtwinklig ist?

VlG Nmxosm
undsoweiter (2018-11-29 20:05:15+00:00): Meiner Erninnerung nach war der Geräteschuppen noch nicht gemappt worden. Vorher gab's da nur das alte Hauptgebäude weiter nördlich.
eggie (2018-10-09 20:34:07+00:00): Dit valt niet onder de definitie van park in OSM. je edits worden verwijderd.
eggie (2018-10-09 20:36:57+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #63359699
seattlefyi (2018-10-10 17:13:39+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Noticed your changes, thanks for the edits! I did notice you put in the street names with abbreviations; could you change these to spell everything out (Dr -> Drive, Ave->Avenue, SE -> Southeast) please? Easy to not know when new, but that's how the project has decided to map things. Thanks again!
seattlefyi (2018-10-15 18:06:42+00:00): Perfect, nice edits and thanks!
Wulfmorn (2018-10-09 20:56:35+00:00): Hej Maria. Använd aldrig Bings bildlager när du ritar av saker i Norge. Använd endast bildlagret "Norway Orthophoto". Det är det enda som håller hög kvalitet. (Det står "imagery_used: Bing aerial imagery" i din ändring). Fortsätt gärna ditt arbete, fast med Norway Orthophoto.
A67-A67 (2018-10-09 20:55:57+00:00): Bedankt voor je toevoegingen. Deze toevoeging is wel erg overbodig. In principe geven we alleen aan of een straat wél een fietsstrook heeft. Geen fietsstroken is default, daar heb je geen tag als cycleway:both=no voor nodig.
Glassman (2018-10-10 22:08:18+00:00): Don't forget to square the building. Just select the outline and type a "s" to square.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63359899
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-09 21:12:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63360555 where the changeset comment is: Removing fantasy mapping
utack (2018-10-13 10:04:08+00:00): Hallo mosi2297,  
hi Mosi2297,  
  
was genau sollte hier an der Karte geändert werden? Derzeit habe ich alle Änderungen rückgängig gemacht da leider ein Punkt verrutscht ist und die Straßengeometrie dann falsch war.  
What exactly was supposed to be changed here? For now i reverted all changes because a node was moved and the road geometry was wrong.  
  
VG  
best  
utack
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-09 21:12:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63360555 where the changeset comment is: Removing fantasy mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-09 20:48:40+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 56341370, 56341725, 56341772, 56341832, 56341837, 56341988, 56341999, 56342015, 56342036, 56342046, 56342068, 56342084, 56342549, 56342572, 56343311, 56343321, 56343354, 56343380, 56343396, 56343450, 56343461, 56343488, 56343503, 56350100, 56368511.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-09 21:12:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63360555 where the changeset comment is: Removing fantasy mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-09 21:12:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63360555 where the changeset comment is: Removing fantasy mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-09 21:12:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63360555 where the changeset comment is: Removing fantasy mapping
Glassman (2018-10-10 22:08:57+00:00): We use full spellings of street names to avoid problems software has with un-abbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63360192
highflyer74 (2018-10-16 12:04:19+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Wenn Du Gebäude hinzufügst, achte möglichst darauf, keine Multipolygon Relationen daraus zu machen, sofern es nicht notwendig ist. Da Du noch recht neu bei OSM bist, vermute ich, dass Du diese unabsichtlich erstellst. Ich habe jetzt drei davon wieder repariert.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Glassman (2018-10-10 22:14:34+00:00): Some tips. In OSM we use the full spelling of street names, for example 38th Drive Southeast instead of an abbreviation. The reason - software has a hard time un-abbreviating. 

When you want to fix a past edit, either yours or someone elses, just modify the existing feature. That way a history is kept. 

And finally, please leave descriptive changeset comments. The numbering doesn't help explain what you did. If you want to know how many edits just go to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mohanad3. 

I'll send you more info in a message. Good luck
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63360340
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-09 21:12:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63360555 where the changeset comment is: Removing fantasy mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-09 21:12:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63360555 where the changeset comment is: Removing fantasy mapping
user_3022894 (2019-04-08 15:46:33+00:00): Hallo Liegeratte,
das von dir getaggte motor_vehicle=no auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41727107 muss ich leider bemängeln. Es ist ein Fußweg mit dem Zusatzschild "ladnwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei" und "Radfahrer frei". Daher sind bicycle=yes und vehicle=agricultural schon richtig. Wenn da jetzt zusätzlich aber ein motor_vehicle=no dran steht, dann können Kraftfahrzeuge gar nicht durch, auch nicht, wenn es sich um landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr handelt, verstehst du?
Viele Grüße, Lukas
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-09 21:12:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63360555 where the changeset comment is: Removing fantasy mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-09 21:12:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 63353418, 63353618, 63353673, 63353810, 63353881, 63353915, 63353936, 63354240, 63354265, 63354316, 63354417, 63360002, 63360044, 63360071, 63360093, 63360136, 63360154, 63360177, 63360365, 63360379, 63360393, 63360401, 63360406, 63360427, 63360434, 63360457, 63360462, 63360474, 63360484.
aharvey (2018-10-10 02:36:13+00:00): Does "Body Mind Life Redfern" take up the whole building, if it's only part of the building, it's probably best to add it separately as a node.
Zverik (2018-10-11 15:10:25+00:00): Hi, why did you remove (again) toll booth on the Tobin bridge?
wambag (2021-03-06 11:51:44+00:00): The toll booths on the bridge were demolished in 2014, and any remaining ones in the entire state in 2016. All-electronic tolling, only gantries over the highways, no booths, no cash
abrensch (2018-10-16 21:16:20+00:00): This edit is bullshit.

You reactivated a razed:highway at a construction site and did not even connect it.
samguer (2018-10-16 22:31:04+00:00): abrensch, my apologies, I must not have been zoomed in enough to notice that segment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98309825) was in fact connected to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250807036). I thought it was connected to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250807031#map=19/49.00563/8.41037). I did not notice I was creating a hanging segment, it looked like it was attached to the rest of the network at Kriegsstraße. I corrected the segment in changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63593044#map=18/49.00558/8.40691. Sorry for any trouble this segment caused you, I meant no harm, i overlooked a small detail, i'll be more careful.
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2018-10-17 10:27:29+00:00): even though it's connected now, it's still bullshit, because it does not exist in reality ...
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2018-10-17 10:32:16+00:00): It's a construction area ...:
https://www.ka-news.de/verkehr/webcams-karlsruhe/Webcam-Kriegsstrasse-westlich-Mendelssohnplatz;art168,1967357
https://www.ka-news.de/verkehr/webcams-karlsruhe/Webcam-Kriegsstrasse-oestlich-Mendelssohnplatz;art168,1967358
samguer (2018-10-17 15:36:53+00:00): Sorry, I saw the Mapillary street level imagery and thought that would be reliable evidence to make this edit on. It said 2017, i thought it would be recent enough, I was wrong. Thank you for the link about the construction, sorry for the trouble.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=ZgwiAYkD3J59n9xSHJOPxQ&focus=photo&lat=49.0057953284537&lng=8.409497403738328&z=17
Nakaner (2018-10-21 09:44:22+00:00): @samguer

Please look at the tag list of every OSM object before you start modifying it. The iD editor you use is not suitable for your task because it hides the list of tags in the bottom left of the window.

The way in question had razed:highway=* without highway=* which is a sign for any mapper that this way only exists to couchmappers to "correct" it to match the so-called "Bing reality".

Please keep in mind that I have reverted all changesets of your company in Europe in the past due to quality issues. That revert was supported by users on the German OSM forum.
samguer (2018-10-22 17:59:33+00:00): @Nakaner

I agree entirely, I was not trying to argue against what has been said here. I was only trying to explain I made my edit in good faith that it was supported with evidence I saw. I was wrong, and created trouble for people. I should have been more thorough when making the edit.

We try to be careful as possible editing in Europe.
Hjart (2018-10-09 21:57:34+00:00): Når man kører på dem (hvilket jeg jævnligt gør), virker de ellers ligeså meget som "rigtige gader", som de andre.
LessThan3Nodes (2018-10-10 16:17:09+00:00): “Rigtig” might not have been the right Danish word to use here, it’s a tough language! What I meant to say is that, per the OSM wiki, these are at grade turning lanes connecting the through ways of highways to each other, and so they are links. More info is here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link . I also removed the names because links are often unnamed and I did not see explicit naming of these sections on Mapillary. Hvilken ord er bedre for at siger de forskel mellem “highway=*” og “highway=*_link”?
user_5359 (2021-04-12 15:04:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on way
What is the meaning of the tag name=22.99311898125 -102.292800375 ? see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632319952/history
naoliv (2018-10-10 12:05:15+00:00): GFDO, novamente você está inserindo objetos no mapa que não existem.
Não é através disso que você vai conseguir vantagem no Pokemon.
atcomapper (2018-10-10 05:17:10+00:00): I have removed these speed limits since they were wrong. Please try to avoid using StreetComplete to add speed limits in Denmark unless you really know what you are doing.
aw_stl (2018-10-10 07:42:32+00:00): Ok, thanks and sorry. Maybe it was the faulty country detection in StreetComplete 8.0. I have updated to 8.1 yesterday evening but will nevertheless disable the speedlimit quest while in denmark.
Sorry agein!
Ro Sun (2018-11-01 11:01:06+00:00): Hi aspath, 
Few months ago, I had changed boundary of Nepal based on data provided by Survey Department of Nepal. But now, I found you had changed the boundary. What is the source you are based on to change this boundary again?
aspath (2018-11-01 21:38:45+00:00): Hi Ro Sun,
This is a disputed area between India and Nepal. It is de facto under Indian control. You can see the boundary of India in the Survey of India maps or any map of Pithoragarh district of Uttarakhand state, India. The boundary shown as per Survey Department of Nepal would indicate the extent of claim of Nepal in this area. The area around Lipu Lekh pass is de facto under India.
jn0 (2018-10-09 22:22:05+00:00): Интересно, коррекция координат войдёт сюда? Или нет?
jn0 (2018-10-09 22:23:01+00:00): Должно бы ть здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=21/55.79250/37.45679
literan (2018-10-10 11:02:52+00:00): Такой тег давно есть: amenity =waste_disposal - и он даже рендерится. Вам уже исправили эту точку (а я удалил пустое отношение, которое вы создали)
skyper (2020-01-24 14:05:21+00:00): Hey dddos

Habe diesen Änderungssatz revertiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80037587

Du hast da viel Information entfernt und die Situation mit nicht verbundenen, kreuzenden Linien noch verschlechtert.

Bist Du Dir sicher, dass and der ganzen Kreuzung keine U-turns erlaubt sind ?

Grüße skyper
dddos (2020-01-25 01:05:52+00:00): Hallo Skyper,
das war Absicht mit den nicht verbundenen Kreuzungspunkten, da nur damit die  Abbiege-Spuren konsequent abzubilden waren. Schade, dass Du's verworfen hast.

Bei dieser Kreuzung (wie bei vielen anderen) sind durch Spurführung und Ampelschaltung u-turns kritisch. Dennoch angegebene u-turn-Tags führen insbesondere bei Interpretation durch die Navis zu falschen, verwirrenden Darstellungen. Abbiege-Infos sollten (mit wenigen Ausnahmen) auf die vor Ort markierten Anweisungen bezogen werden (hier: auf die verbindlichen Pfeile auf den Spuren der Fahrbahn, die aber keinen u-turn ausweisen) und nicht auf vielleicht  technisch machbare Manöver.  Ich halte u-turn-Tagging hier für ein no-go. Wer hier dennoch wenden will, wird das in Eigenverantwortung wohl tun. 
Bist Du anderer Meinung, habe ich anders lautende Regeln zum Mappen übersehen?
Gruß
ddos
skyper (2020-01-25 12:19:22+00:00): Hi dddos
Wäre eigentlich deine Aufgabe gewesen, nach den Änderungen ohne vorherige Absprache.

Wieso nur ohne gemeinsame Punkte möglich ? Das ist dann ein Fehler.

Du kannst nicht was durch bewusste Fehler für bestimmte Software reparieren. Da sollte die Software angepasst werden.

Die turn-restrictions ergeben sich durch blaue Verkehrszeichen und durchgezogene Linien auf der Fahrbahn, jedoch nicht durch die Pfeile am Boden. Meine Frage zielte ja auch bewusst  auf die Ab-/Auffahrten.

Ciao skyper
skyper (2020-01-26 14:47:53+00:00): Hey dddos,
Hab mal noch ein paar turn:lanes ergänzt. Leider scheint an der Modellierung der Kreuzung nicht viel zu ändern, somit sind die turn-restrictions notwendig.

Bei den U-Turn habe ich noch zu den blauen Schildern das U-turn- bzw links-abbieger-Verbotsschild vergessen zu erwähnen. Ich will hier die rechtliche Lage mappen und nicht was möglich ist.
Grüße skyper
muralito (2019-07-31 14:06:01+00:00): Hola.

En una parte de la Av. Perón etiquetaste que tiene cuatro sendas en cada sentido.
Por la foto aerea no parece haber ancho suficiente para eso. ¿Estas seguro de que son 4 por sentido, y no 2 por cada uno?
viloan (2018-10-09 22:29:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
joost schouppe (2019-01-28 18:44:33+00:00): I don't think you meant to downgrade https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62073425/history from trunk to residential
moon_walker (2019-01-28 19:59:53+00:00): Sorry, I accidentally downgraded this. Thank you for finding and fixing!
carciofo (2019-04-29 09:41:26+00:00): Hi, what was the reason ford downgrading the members of relation 5511549 to tertiary?
JadeHeart (2019-05-01 17:36:57+00:00): Hi, moon_walker is no longer on the team so I’ll pick up the communication on this changeset. Relation/5511549 was downgraded from tertiary to unclassified and seems to fit the Colombia classification guidelines for unclassified: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Guide_for_mapping_in_Colombia#Street_classifications. This minor route is unpaved and connects a number of small hamlets.

There were additional relations connected to this that were downgraded to ensure the route was consistently classified (r5505831, r5505829).
carciofo (2019-05-19 09:40:45+00:00): But this is part of a National Highway though, and connects San Vicente del Caguan with Neiva. The fact that it's unpaved has little influence, as a large portion of rural roads in Colombia are unpaved. Connectivity plays a more defining role on road priority, so this is definitely not unclassified. Tertiary was the correct classification. Kindly revert.
JadeHeart (2019-05-20 20:48:25+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out, I will edit the classification to be tertiary between San Vicente de Caguán and Neiva.
aharvey (2018-10-10 02:15:09+00:00): Hi,

Just a few tips, if a feature already exists in OSM why do you need to add a duplicate? Is this for a school assignment? I've deleted the duplicate parks.

Also see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace that's the right tag for an outline of a series of terrace houses drawn as a whole.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things the name tag is for the name only, not a description.

Did you survey https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632329668 as apartments, there is another node saying it's a boxing sports center...

For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632329683 it's probably better to just map the cafe as a node, the that building part was already mapped as two levels, which it looks like it from the image, but you say it's 1 level, so right now we have conflicting information there... Could you shed some light please?

For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632329681 the railway landuse is already mapped, it's probably best we use that for the railway=station, but best to read up on the wiki about mapping stations first.

I've fixed these things. It's okay, just some handy tips for next time!
Warin61 (2020-01-27 04:14:39+00:00): More fixing. 
Drawing 'on top' .. ok .. but delete the things 'underneath' when finished!
Glassman (2018-10-10 22:23:10+00:00): I think you just want access=private. the tag bicycle=private isn't a valid tag. Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle. Same applies to motor_vehicle. foot=no means that no one can walk on the street. Even residents. You might want foot=designated. 

Is there a gate at the entrance? You can add a node at the entrance and show the gate. 

I'll send you a message with more info on OSM. Good luck.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63362536
Nmxosm (2018-10-10 09:52:57+00:00): Hallo Hackthemap,

in diesem Changeset hast du bei einigen Gebäuden roof:orientation=across angegeben, ohne roof:shape gesetzt zu haben. Da sich roof:orientation aber auf roof:shape bezieht (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings), ist es so unüblich kartiert.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
hackthemap (2018-10-12 01:25:42+00:00): Hey Nmxosm :)
Ja, ich konnte sehen, in welcher Richtung das Dach verläuft, jedoch nicht genau welche der Formen aus dem S3DB tagging scheme es ist und habe so schon einmal die sicheren Daten eingetragen, damit ein nachträgliches eintragen der Form (z.B. per StreetComplete) dann zu einem richtigen Ergebnis führt.