piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AshlyAsh (2016-12-26 22:47:11+00:00): Er det bedre at lave mange små rettelser end nogle få store rettelser?
Hjart (2016-12-26 22:49:46+00:00): Det afhænger af omstændighederne. Jeg har tendens til at lave meget omfattende rettesæt.
Hjart (2016-12-26 22:53:11+00:00): I JOSM kan man gemme uden at lukke et rettesæt. Det benytter jeg mig af når jeg retter i et område hvor der er større risiko for konflikter med andre.
AshlyAsh (2016-12-26 22:57:02+00:00): Okay, jeg tror, jeg vil holde mig til nogle mindre områder af gangen og holde mere øje med historiken.
Hjart (2016-12-26 22:59:58+00:00): Ok :-)

Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag indtil videre (jeg har indtryk af at du har pænt styr på tingene selvom du laver lidt begynderfejl her og der).
Håber vi må få et godt samarbejde fremover.
AshlyAsh (2016-12-26 23:02:08+00:00): Tak og i lige måde. :)
AsgerFrank (2016-12-27 01:12:25+00:00): De mange ændringer af path til footway kunne fortjene en begrundelse i comment to changeset, hvis der er én. Ændringer af det bestående skal jo gerne være fordi det er en forbedring.
Eksempelvis er det ikke umiddelbart til at forstå, at den relativt brede bugtende forbindelsessti nord-syd ved Vindinggård er mere en fodsti end de omgivende  cykelstier.
Jeg kan nu desværre ikke rigtig gøre rede for, hvad der skulle være forskellen på en cykelsti med foot tilladt (det er det jo per definition altid) versus en footway med cykel tilladt. Ikke andet end den bekendte mapnik-rendringsforskel med (user-friendly?) blåstipling af cykelstier, samt noget så vagt som en fornemmet tradition for at tagge asfalterede stier, der må cykles på, som cycleways.
AshlyAsh (2016-12-27 04:42:05+00:00): Okay jeg husker at henvise til offficel side
AsgerFrank (2016-12-27 09:38:33+00:00): Nåh, nej det er nu ikke sådan at man i almindelighed behøver at henvise til wiki'en, hvis det er den du tænker på, det er vist kun af og til. 
Mere at skrive en smule når det kan gøre nytte for at forstå ændringer.
AsgerFrank (2016-12-27 10:01:31+00:00): Wiki'en skriver helt fint om changesets, selvom man polemisk kan hævde det er noget idealistisk, sammenlignet med hvordan praksis ses  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset 
"comment=* – describing why a mapper made that group of changes, or what was changed ..."
"source=* – specify the source for the edits that have been made in this changeset."
DK7080BE (2016-12-27 14:09:36+00:00): Jeg vil mene at det er forkert at bruge highway=footway for skiltede fællesstier, hvor der må færdes fodgængere, cyklister og elcyklister, i hvert fald stierne indenfor Vindinggård Ringvej, da stierne har bicycle=designated. Jeg vil mene at highway=path eller måske highway=cycleway er det rigtige, som vist her:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_Universal_Tag
AsgerFrank (2016-12-27 14:47:04+00:00): Et link til "fællessti", som vi kender det i Danmark
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning
DK7080BE (2016-12-27 20:39:04+00:00): Dit link er ikke til "fællessti" men til cykelsti.
Fx. bruges highway=cycleway ofte ved dobbeltrettede cykelstier, såsom den dobbeltrettede cykelsti ved Andkærvej.

Ved fællesstier bruges hyppigst "highway=path", som vist her:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_Universal_Tag

Uden ekstra tags betyder:
highway=path : ikke-motoriseret færdsel
highway=footway : kun færdsel til fods.
highway=cycleway : cykelsti hvor færdsel til fods også er tilladt hvis der ikke er fortov.

I dette link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
står der:
highway=path is a generic path, either multi-use or unspecified usage, open to all non-motorized vehicles. The path may have any type of surface.

For urban paths which a designated for pedestrians only, better use highway=footway.
Hjart (2016-12-27 21:16:41+00:00): Her vil jeg gerne henvise til en diskussion jeg fornylig deltog i: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274061. Sagen er ikke helt så enkel som man kunne ønske sig ;-)
maraf24 (2020-02-08 17:04:40+00:00): To chyba o tej edycji jest mowa w tej uwadze:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2067054
zors1843 (2016-12-27 05:29:17+00:00): Please do not use openstreetmap to enter false data.  Thank you.
daganzdaanda (2017-07-20 22:55:13+00:00): Hi sofasurfer, du hast die Augsburger Straße hier teilweise zur Einbahnstraße gemacht. Schau mal hier hin: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1035558
sofasurfer68 (2017-07-25 19:03:53+00:00): Hi daganzdaanda, erst mal danke fürs Ausbessern. So ganz erklären kann ich’s mir nicht, was da schief gelaufen ist, da es schon sieben Monate her ist und ich eigentlich nur Bürgersteige hinzugefügt habe. Aber gut das bei OpenStreetMap das viel Augenprinzip herrscht und man gelegentlich Fehler Dritte ausbessert bzw. wie in diesem Fall Dritte meine Fehler ausbessern :-(.
muralito (2016-12-27 00:32:27+00:00): Hola. El viewpoint conviene descibir lo que se puede ver de ahi...
pneff (2016-12-26 22:50:58+00:00): source mislabeled, this was based on local survey.
MadelNL (2016-12-29 15:21:10+00:00): Het zijn geen vijvers, maar hooguit regenwater buffers. Het zijn zeker geen vijvers en grasland dekte de lading eigenlijk wel redelijk. Als je het veranderen wil, maar er dan een regenwaterbuffer van aub. (Ik ben ter plaatse bekend met de situatie). ;)
trigpoint (2016-12-27 18:13:30+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. This edit has gone a little wrong, the Drayton Court Hotel is already mapped, I have removed your duplication.
user_4547543 (2016-12-26 23:24:40+00:00): Should say: Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento cartográfico 2016 por KG.
Commodoortje (2016-12-27 10:17:53+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-12-27 10:18:34+00:00): Inmiddels wat kleine aanpassingen verricht.
chalet is namelijk niet de juiste aanduiding 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:tourism%3Dchalet
SomeoneElse (2017-01-01 21:06:08+00:00): Hello,
You've changed the landuse on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291482742/history from "police" to "grass".  When I was last here it was a Police dog-training facility; is it no longer used for that?  If so, then "landuse=grass" doesn't really make sense as it's not really the "landuse" here.
Best Regards,
Andy
GOwin (2016-12-26 23:45:32+00:00): why is the changeset comment a "fix me"?
geodreieck4711 (2016-12-28 14:32:07+00:00): Bitte keine überschneidenden Linien erzeugen. innenliegende Flächen werden nicht mit der Außenline verbunden.
klassischer Fall für Multipolygon...
geodreieck4711 (2016-12-28 14:33:10+00:00): es war die linie 461980491
santamariense (2016-12-27 03:56:16+00:00): Oi erick,
Eu reativei as notas do usuário portalaventura em Itaara/RS. Na verdade ele criou estas notas para que se verifique a campo, ou que alguém que conheça responda. Até pq se prestar a atenção, ele demonstra dúvidas em suas palavras.
De qualquer maneira, acho que não precisa desfazer a sua edição no local, até porque é preferível que um usuário do OSM tenha que fazer um percurso maior, que chegar em uma rua que não se conecta à outra rua desejada.
Bons mapeamento.
portalaventura (2016-12-27 13:10:50+00:00): A ideia das notas era deixar registrada a dúvida para ver se alguém resolve antes de eu ir lá verificar. Mas são dúvidas que só podem ser resolvidas em campo. Concordo, dos males o menor, mesmo pq tenho quase certeza que não existem nenhuma conexão entre aquelas ruas. O que me incomodou é fazer alterações nos dados, fechar a nota sem comentar, com um changeset com o comentário vago "resolvendo notas" e source=bing. Só que bing não é fonte para aquelas alterações. Resolver notas é importante mas não me parece que podem ser resolvidas do atacado colocando source=bing pra tudo.
user_5359 (2016-12-27 06:18:24+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Können die Notizen https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/829548 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/829545 geschlossen werden?

Bitte auch mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Reiten#St.C3.A4lle_und_Reitanlagen lesen, dies beschreibt die Situation aus meiner Sicht besser als ein Ferienhaus.
Howpper (2016-12-27 00:38:44+00:00): I also added a traffic light.
Upendrakarukonda (2016-12-27 13:15:22+00:00): Hi AT4TWalker,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contribution is appreciable. It's better not to use proprietary sources for mapping in OpenStreetMap. 

Regards,


Upendra.
Carnildo (2016-12-29 06:05:06+00:00): Besides, in my experience, Google often gets park boundaries spectacularly wrong.
LACDH (2016-12-27 03:04:44+00:00): Major revamp of North Shore Hospital area.
dhoni007 (2019-04-02 13:57:03+00:00): Hi Harrymahar,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way 658623376, way 459764037, way 458840138, way 458840141, way 459764035, way 459764032, way 658366325, way 459764030 and way 459764027 classified as 'Tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Unclassified'. 
Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance.
Alecs01 (2017-01-02 16:45:29+00:00): Hola Bray, bienvenido en OpenStreetMap, estos no son refugios de montaña, no pongas notas personales como "casa de mi abuela" o "casa de mi tia" en el mapa, son visibles para todos, gracias.
ff5722 (2016-12-27 09:52:56+00:00): 你好，你知道如果这个信息对不对？
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/774932
Supaplex (2016-12-27 06:07:39+00:00): 公車站重覆了
Supaplex (2016-12-31 14:48:23+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-12-27 06:43:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Владимир К (2017-01-23 12:18:38+00:00): Перестаньте использовать редактор в качестве личных заметок. Зачем вы добавили это? Дом Фурманова 47 уже отмечен на карте.
Hjart (2016-12-27 08:43:42+00:00): I have reverted this. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Denmark.
Fa7C0N (2016-12-27 09:26:52+00:00): Sorry, This is my bad. I will be careful in the future.

Thank you for letting me know this.
Hjart (2016-12-27 18:16:29+00:00): I think Denmark & Norway (neighbouring countries) are the only exeptions to the general rule in this respect, so I guess you are excused for not being aware :-)
user_5359 (2016-12-27 06:19:39+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
neaoadway (2016-12-27 06:24:41+00:00): This data is updated by us
Athalis (2016-12-27 12:19:18+00:00): Hi, it looks like you used Bing imagery and therefore mistakenly used for the buildings shape a tree. All data in this area is based on newer imagery from the HOT project http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/1240

I squared the building in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44704787 but thanks for noticing and fixing the intersection
hsc666 (2016-12-27 16:03:54+00:00): Deine letzten beiden Changesets sehen unplausibel aus. Zum einen scheint mir eine Reithalle über 3 Etagen zu futuristisch - falls mit der Angabe eine gewisse Höhe angegeben werden sollte, kann dies mit dem Key "height" erledigt werden. Zum anderen: die Hausnummer 13 ist bereits am benachbarten Gebäude eingetragen.
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
tyr_asd (2017-02-08 15:55:30+00:00): Hi! Es genügt, wenn der Bahnhof einmal in OSM gemappt ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/668985092 :-) – Habe die doppelten Informationen wieder entfernt.

PS: Außerdem ist "Vierschach" im OSM-Sinn ein Haltepunkt (railway=halt) und kein Bahnhof (railway=station), siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway%3Dstation

Gruß, Martin
samely (2017-02-16 17:13:22+00:00): Hi!
Thanks for contributing to OSM, I was working around this area and found many ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270520384 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270520800 without tags, could you please check and clean them if those don't have any sense to still exist on the map?
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
whalerich (2016-12-28 07:14:48+00:00): классная правка! спасибо (-:
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
literan (2016-12-27 13:18:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462031977 здесь в каждую сторону по 4 полосы движения?
Serguei Dukachev (2016-12-28 05:58:17+00:00): Пока по две. Точнее, в сторону Москвы - 2-3, в зависимости от участка.
jleedev (2017-01-16 16:05:21+00:00): Can you please explain what you're doing in changeset comments? It's not obvious to me why, for example, the Edgeworth-Coraopolis border should be moved to the south to lie on the Dashields Lock and Dam. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary says to avoid connecting boundaries to physical features unless the boundary is legally defined to be the physical feature.
eggie (2023-10-26 15:00:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
poornibadrinath (2017-01-17 05:49:48+00:00): Hi احمدان,
 I came across your edits and noticed that you have added a number of attraction tags and added personal names to them. Please note that the attraction tags are only meant for tourism related tags and not to be used for any other pois. Please revert this changeset or delete the unwanted attraction tags. For more info on tagging on osm, refer to this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags

Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
Supaplex (2016-12-31 14:47:21+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
whb (2017-02-04 07:34:55+00:00): Eine Versicherung ist kein Anwalt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2978677421/history
whb (2017-02-04 07:42:07+00:00): Seltsamer Name für ein Gestrüpp: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375974112/history
user_5359 (2016-12-27 09:02:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
anu_bala (2019-04-05 04:05:15+00:00): "Hi Harrymahar,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across 
way 458857134 classified as 'Tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery we are unable to verify the road existence. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance."
user_5359 (2016-12-27 08:56:03+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-27 15:18:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-27 15:16:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-27 10:00:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387339486 ? Is this the same business?
Jarek 🚲 (2019-05-30 18:40:19+00:00): Hello,

Unfortunately here as well there are several mis-capitalizations and errors:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35351634, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36518312, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36518326, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35349342 start with lowercase - please resolve https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1796443 when updated
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462094737 "south"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69706599 "south"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462065486 "Lane East Clinton Harbord" - doesn't match Geobase, missing direction
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8099899 "Lane East Clinton Harbord" - doesn't match Geobase, missing direction
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22788167 "college"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462050986 is this really named "Lane West Oakwood West Oakwood" - Geobase indicates another name
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462050985 is this really named "Lane West Oakwood East Oakwood" - Geobase indicates another name
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32118974 "south" miscapitalized
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462046152 name missing a direction
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462046151 name misspelled "East"
(please resolve https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1770793 after these last two are updated)

Plus a few others that have been corrected already
lorandr_telenav (2019-05-31 08:45:42+00:00): Hello. Thank you for telling me. I corrected the mistakes. I’ll be more careful! Thanks a lot!
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
user_5359 (2016-12-27 09:58:03+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
Hjart (2016-12-27 09:44:44+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.

Jeg har forbundet de stier du har tegnet i parken ved skolen til de tilstødende veje. Se fig. 5 i https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3.1
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
Hjart (2016-12-27 10:15:26+00:00): Jeg har ændret denne lidt idet jeg har indtryk af at den ikke helt fortjener betegnelsen "monument"  (ihvertfald ikke i OSM forstand: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument)
DD1GJ (2016-12-27 11:53:38+00:00): Was verstehst Du unter "Zulässig"? Auf dem Luftbild ist nur das Schotterbett zu erkennen, die Sichtweite der zweigleisigen Strecke ist durch Kurven eingeschränkt und in wenigen hundert Metern Entfernung sind zwei Unterführungen. Wenn Du keine vernünftige Erklärung hast, werde ich Deine Eintragungen sicherheitshalber heute Abend zurücksetzen.
Pulsmuster (2016-12-27 12:14:09+00:00): Sorry, Anfängerfehler im Browser - in Höhe des Seerenteiches ist die Querung natürlich unzulässig. (Der Eintrag bezog sich auf die hinzugefügte Querung im bisher nicht vorhandenen Tunnel in Höhe der Rast unterhalb des Seerenteiches in Ri. Dresden.) Vielen Dank für den korrekten Hinweis. Der Rest stimmt aber :)
DD1GJ (2016-12-27 19:59:50+00:00): Hallo, alles klar. Vor lauter aceess-Tags hatte ich die Tunnel-Kennzeichnung übersehen, zumal noch ein "layer=-1" fehlt. Somit entsteht ein Fehler, da sich Weg und Schienen auf gleicher Ebene kreuzen. "access=no" und dann wieder Freigaben für Fußgänger und Radfahrer sind überflüssig und verwirrend. Bei einem Pfad einfach weglassen, die Router behandeln einen Pfad automatisch so. Weitere Informationen und Erklärungen findest Du z.B. unter http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a und  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viel Spaß mit OSM.
Osm1980 (2017-02-28 17:25:26+00:00): tage moayene fanni mishe 
amenity=vehicle_inspection
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].