piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2019-10-24 07:51:15+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it got some strange tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/747495459
sistat 	0
sistaw 	0
topmar 	1

Jan
pyrog (2019-10-25 07:44:17+00:00): Hi,
These tags came from the import (S-57 data) and must be deleted.
I will do this later.
Thanks Jan for your message.
Yves
pyrog (2019-10-25 15:48:40+00:00): done
PLima785 (2019-10-22 12:30:34+00:00): Boa tarde,
Reparei na sua edição, tive a corrigir algumas etiquetas para melhorar o que introduziu. Pode acrescentar mais detalhes no ponto como a morada da empresa.
Qualquer dúvida, pode mandar MP para este nome de utilizador ou para o canal de telegram do OSM Portugal https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Obrigado
Frans S (2019-10-21 17:11:32+00:00): Hi Grie_mar
You know about the empty places which still need to be mapped ?
See  my comment on the Slack channel (validation of HOTOSM how to deal with that.)
martien-176 (2019-10-21 19:43:21+00:00): Hi Frans, i do not completely understand. Are you referring to https://hotosm.slack.com/archives/C4GLC45PY/p1571385023019600?thread_ts=1571352097.019400&cid=C4GLC45PY
Frans S (2019-10-22 07:21:49+00:00): See this document
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1RAoZqtxw-C3EbbcD1gszKOl99B2FtI4w
Because the missing tasks have to be mapped as well is this document made where a mapper who want to map on that part can  check what have to be done. 
We have to be carefully because you run the risk that a few mappers are mapping the same spot and get a conflict by creating duplicated mappings.
martien-176 (2019-10-22 08:58:10+00:00): Ok got it thanks
BCNorwich (2019-10-21 12:12:31+00:00): Hi, I've consolidated the info from the POI onto the building, thus avoiding duplication of data.
adamgillett (2019-10-21 12:16:12+00:00): Thanks BCNorwich. Would be good to have clarity on the best way to mark/unmark the old location, and how to get the red point text onto the new hospital location.
BCNorwich (2019-10-21 12:53:35+00:00): Hi Adam, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The new hospital site is OK as it's now tagged. It just takes a little while for it to be re-rendered. Sometimes it could be up to a few days (but not usually that long).

Is the old hospital building still present or has it been demolished? This determines how to now tag it.

Regards Bernard.
adamgillett (2019-10-21 12:57:49+00:00): Aha, understood - didn't realise it was a delayed render.

The old building is still present and will be used as additional wards for inpatients until some point early next year but is not the primary building any more and should probably not appear as a duplicate for this reason. Not sure of the ultimate fate of the building but the structure is currently still present. See my source for general details: https://www.uclh.nhs.uk/OurServices/OurHospitals/RNENTD/Pages/Home.aspx

and

https://www.uclh.nhs.uk/OurServices/OurHospitals/RNTNE/Pages/Home.aspx
BCNorwich (2019-10-21 13:55:23+00:00): Hi Adam,

In that case I would remove the outline which is Way: MOVED - Royal National Nose, Throat and Ear Hospital (402058132)

Leaving Way: 28226427 as the only building outline because that is part of the university site relation. 
Reinstate the building tag as it's still a building but also add the tag disused=yes. The name could also be reinstated and tagged disused:name=???  Lastly add note=ENT facility has moved to a new site. Thus folk will know whats happened and not remap the moved facility.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
ma-rt-in (2019-10-22 09:05:25+00:00): Hallo,
dürfte ich mal bitte erfahren, woher der Sinn kommt an so gut wie allen Bushaltestellen(platform) ein bus=yes und ähnliche key´s zu kleben?
vg
discontinuity (2019-10-22 09:19:35+00:00): Es war eine Empfehlung von iD - dass diese benötigt sind um die Tags auf die aktuelle Standard zu bringen. Stimmt es nicht? Ich bin neu hier in OSM, und dachte dass iD mir gute Empfehlungen geben wird ;)
ma-rt-in (2019-10-22 09:22:22+00:00): Die Empfehlungen von iD entsprechend nicht immer dem Standard von OpenStreetMap. Deine Änderungen sind käse und ich werde diese somit zurücksetzen. 
Unter folgendem Link kannst du dir anschauen, weshalb die Änderungen unnötig waren: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=625726

vg Martin

P.S.: Wenn du weiterhin in Hamburg mappst, würde ich dir empfehlen die Telegram Gruppe von OSM Hamburg zu besuchen: https://t.me/osm_de_hh
discontinuity (2019-10-22 09:30:56+00:00): Shit, die sind aber nicht alle Bushaltestellen, und ich bin mir viel mehr sicher dass was ich mit die S-bahn und U-bahn gemacht habe war richtig (public_transport=station, subway=yes oder light_rail=yes, und wikidata z.B.). Soll ich die einfach wieder machen? Oder mindestens kannst du die überwiegend S-bahn und U-bahn edits lassen, und ich losche die bus=yes manuell heute Abend?
ma-rt-in (2019-10-22 09:32:58+00:00): Ich habe deine Änderung bereits komplett zurück gesetzt. Auch waren zum Teil die setzung von public_transport=station fehlerhaft, auch das setzen von subway=yes und light_rail=yes waren nicht richtig. Des Weiteren sind bereits viele wikidata und wikipedia eintränge in den stop_area´s erfasst.
PLima785 (2019-10-21 14:36:57+00:00): Boas, podes confirmar sff se as ruas e acessos em volta estão correctos?
Existe uma ciclovia tbm
Chris Fleming (2019-10-24 12:48:04+00:00): HI thanks for making these Edits. I see that you requested a review of thew edits. In general the edits looks fine; my only comment is that it shouldn't be necessary to  have to add access to footpaths, routers should assume that these are good, but no harm in confirming, Let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris
ffinnm (2019-11-11 14:05:19+00:00): Thanks Chris, 
I think I clicked 'review' by accident there! The routing plugin that I am using through QGIS currently only includes bridleways where foot=yes, but I have asked them to change this to include foot=designated,   so I don't have t make these edits any more.
Cheers,
Frank
user_5359 (2019-10-21 12:37:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you use layer=-1? This order only the objects for the sequence of painting. Did you mean level (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level)?
Hank Parra (2019-10-21 12:45:32+00:00): Thanks for the welcome! It popped up as an issue as I was joining the faces since the buildings are joined physically. I obliged with OSM’s suggestion to get rid of the trivial error message. Should I not have done this for a reason I’m not aware of?
TaraV (2020-04-05 12:02:38+00:00): Hi, 
By combining a roundabout into a full circle (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432565972  ) you have affected destination_sign relations on it that are now incorrect. In the future please look out for all relations (destination_sign; turn_restrictions…) when combining/splitting ways. 
Also, I am not sure that roundabouts in general should be merged. Some roundabouts have valuable lane information on ways that can be different depending on the change of lanes in one roundabout. 

Best, 
Tara
Supt_of_Printing (2020-04-05 12:39:27+00:00): Hi Tara, thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have only recently been learning about such things as destinations, etc., but still a bit of a novice with these finer points. I like to get ways smooth and accurate, removing the chunky style of so many. I will be more careful in future.
Cheers,
Supt.
TaraV (2020-04-05 12:44:16+00:00): No problem, I assumed so. If you have any questions concerning destination sign relation or anything else feel free to contact me. I'll be happy to help.
Best,
Tara
Hjart (2019-10-21 13:44:23+00:00): Er kilden her kompatibel med OSM med hensyn til licens? Linket kræver at man logger ind på en hjemmeside, som jeg ikke umiddelbart kender.
Kristian Tange (2019-10-21 15:41:08+00:00): Det er den nok ikke, jeg var lidt for hurtig, kan ikke umiddelbart finde et sted hvor der står at man må bruge/reproducere deres data. Min fejl..
Suo5eaFi (2019-10-26 10:57:23+00:00): Laut Wiki ist highway=cycleway nur für Wege gedacht, auf denen keine anderen Verkehrsteilnehmer erlaubt sind. Auf den Wegen sind aber, soweit ich weiß, auch Fußgänger erlaubt.
Von daher würde hier highway=path besser passen.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
krilog (2019-10-26 13:07:39+00:00): Das ist seltsam. Ich hatte das Objekt "Rad- und Fußweg" ausgewählt. Warum wird dann "cycleway" eingetragen, wo das doch anscheinend falsch ist?
highflyer74 (2019-10-26 15:35:01+00:00): Hallo krilog!

Das liegt vermutlich an dem von Dir verwendeten Editor "iD", der leider in einigen Dingen weit davon entfernt ist, optimal zu sein.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße!
krilog (2019-10-26 19:54:44+00:00): Ok. Danke. Dann schau ich in mir mal an.
archie (2019-10-21 11:50:35+00:00): Går hela denna stig under jorden?
jh8333 (2019-10-21 12:09:12+00:00): Nej, den hade felaktigt blivit satt som tunnel av mig av någon anledning... Jag har justerat detta.
archie (2019-10-21 14:50:20+00:00): Tack!
eggie (2019-10-21 12:28:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
PT-53 (2019-10-24 15:02:24+00:00): Hallo Arne,
Du hast mit diesem neuen Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6902559201/history
die Straße und Eisenbahnlinie miteinander verbunden. Das ist falsch. Die Straße verläuft dort doch auf einer Brücke über den Gleisen.
Löscht Du den falschen Verbindungsknoten wieder?
Fragende Grüße
Arne Schwarck (2019-10-24 17:36:56+00:00): Knoten nicht absichtlich gemacht. Knoten gelöscht
Dein Änderungssatz #: 76168073
trigpoint (2019-10-21 12:03:09+00:00): Hi, what is the source you are using to tag these legal restrictions?

There are only two such legal restrictions visible on bing streetside?

Maybe there should be only two relations?

Cheers Phil
Velox (2019-10-21 12:53:13+00:00): Hi! 
You absolutely correct! 
Funny thing is that I checked both north and west sides, and assumed that whole intersection is closed for U-turns. 
I'll fix this. 
Thank you!
KarmaCleaner (2019-10-21 19:29:55+00:00): "source survey" means that you've found any indication "SS14"?
Provide sources, since wikipedia definitely states: "Da Sistiana la strada è stata declassificata a SR 14 (strada regionale 14), diventa lungomare fino a Trieste (in tale tratto la strada viene chiamata strada Costiera). Dopo la città la strada si inerpica sul Carso collegando il centro con Basovizza ed infine con Pesek e la Slovenia. "
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75993252
eggie (2019-10-21 12:26:45+00:00): reverted by changeset #75994976
Beste Bert
Zou je willen stoppen met adresgegevens aan het gebouw toe te voegen. 
Je brijdrage is teruggedraaid.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-21 12:47:13+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. 
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2019-10-22 13:23:13+00:00): Dag Mark,
Je hebt hier de correctie tag gebruikt, maar die heb je nu toegevoegd aan het daar getekende footway. Zou die tag niet beter thuishoren op de naastgelegen highway ? De voertuigen rijden immers niet over het voetpad.
Mark Sloothaak (2019-10-22 14:14:15+00:00): Sorry Leo, maar ik begrijp je niet.
Leo Slager (2019-10-22 14:51:53+00:00): contact via PB
jmapb (2019-11-02 02:49:06+00:00): Hi sainiyam! I've reverted this changeset. It appears the roads you drew were from outdated imagery (Bing.) 

The most up-to-date aerial imagery in NYC at the moment is Mapbox Satellite followed closely by ESRI World and NY State Orthos, which have the same imagery at the moent (ESRI's is better resolution but NY State has better alignment.)

J
sainiyam (2019-11-04 08:22:37+00:00): Hi,
Apologies for the incorrect edit, I missed to edit according to the recent imagery.I will ensure not to repeat the mistake again.Looking forward to learning from you.
Regards,
sainiyam.
ZZ29 (2019-10-23 19:10:56+00:00): Hi Pyrog,
What does explain the removal of tags like "height", "source" or ref on the "Phare de Saint-Mathieu" (way #33092586) ?
Regards,
ZZ29
pyrog (2019-10-23 19:30:26+00:00): height is kept on the tower itself (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/737281110)

source value was obsolete. The source used is on the changeset.

ref ? Do you mean seamark:light:reference ?

According Malcolm, seamark:light:reference is deprecated.

I get and clean the value and store it in ref:admiralty
I also use other references:
ref:nga
ref:uscg in USA
ref:aladin, ref:shom in France…

BR,
ZZ29 (2019-10-23 19:41:14+00:00): Ok, I understand better what you did.
The tower and the lighthouse are one single building, I think there should be a relation as you've created a building in another building.
For the ref, I was talking about ref:FR:ANFR (the only one ref modified in this changeset) which is not recognize by osmose on the new building. http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=8391%2C8392&zoom=11&lat=48.3726&lon=-4.6686&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=
That's an osmose issue
pyrog (2019-10-23 19:53:13+00:00): > That's an osmose issue
+1

> he tower and the lighthouse are one single building,
>I think there should be a relation as you've created a building in another building. 

I tried to do that, with all the tags on the relation, except ref:FR:ANFR and seamark:* on the tower.
But I wasn't satisfied.

If you have a good solution, you're welcome

BR
ZZ29 (2019-10-23 19:58:10+00:00): I'm just talking about a building multipolygon-relation with "inner" & "outer" roles, and you keep the building tag on the inner. ;-)
ma-rt-in (2019-10-22 10:01:12+00:00): Hallo,
ein explizites setzten von bicylce=no an highway=footway (Way 178989743) ist niicht nötig, da highway=footway dies bereits impliziert.
vg
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-23 07:08:08+00:00): Dzięki za poprawkę! Właśnie zauważyłem ten problem ale widzę że juz jest naprawiony.
eggie (2019-10-21 13:12:51+00:00): De tag animal_keeping=..... is eigenlijk een specificatie van landuse=animal_keeping
, maar het zal niet de bedoeling zijn om landuse=forest te gaan omtaggen lijkt mij.
Kijk nog eens in de wiki  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Danimal_keeping

MVG,
Eggie
s©tt (2019-10-21 13:22:21+00:00): niet helemaal duidelijk wat je bedoelt. het is een gebied in het park met gras omringt door bos, waar een boer zijn koeien mag uitlaten. de koeien lopen dus ook door het bos, en eten van het gras.
s©tt (2019-10-21 13:27:20+00:00): het is dus primair stadsparkbos, waar ook koeien rondlopen/eten. mag er twee landuse tags zijn (forest + animal_keeping)? of kan ik het hele gebied omringen met een landuse animal_keeping?
eggie (2019-10-21 13:31:03+00:00): Twee landusetags resulteert in een key landuse_1=  en dat klopt dan weer niet met de afspraken binnen OSM. Zou het zo laten. Soms is het schipperen. :)
landuse=animal_keeping zal niet renderen als landuse grass en zeker niet als bos.
landuse=meadow kennen we wel voor weiland ipv landuse =grass 
Wellicht een keer een vraag voor het forum van OSM.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2019-10-21 13:35:32+00:00): Omringen. wellicht een idee... Eigenlijk taggen we geen landuse op landuse... geen idee wat de validator van editor JOSM daar van vindt? 
Hoogstwaarschijnlijk heeft landuse=animal_keeping geen rendering en zou het moeten kunnen.
Zal eens een stukje uittesten in een bos waar ook paarden grazen.
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-21 13:42:45+00:00): editor josm heeft er geen problemen mee.
Dus een exgtra landuse tag.  De tag is overigens cow    en/of horse  Dus niet in het meervoud.
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-21 12:56:26+00:00): Wim.. op het moment dat je tourism = attraction verwijderd doet het in OSM niets.
attraction=...  is de specificatie van tourism=attraction

Dit waren je edits  http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=75995640
MVG,
Eggie
Wimpey (2019-10-21 13:04:54+00:00): Ah, ik heb ze in de click-and-point interface simpelweg veranderd van "toeristische attractie" naar "standaard pretparkattractie" of "achtbaan", zonder handmatig aan de specificacties te zitten. Wil je dat ik iets terug herstel? Dan doe ik dat met alle plezier. Groet, Wim
eggie (2019-10-21 13:20:26+00:00): Up to you.. Het is jouw project..
In de overpass api (zie boven) kun je zien wat je hebt gedaan door te klikken op een bepaalde way of node. 
Gr eggie
gileri (2019-10-25 21:13:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Est-ce que les anciens bâtiments sont toujours là ? Actuellement ils sont les uns sur les autres sur la carte.
eggie (2019-10-21 13:26:26+00:00): review. Zie feedback op latere changeset.
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-10-22 04:26:41+00:00): Улицу желательно указывать.
schoka (2019-10-21 16:42:29+00:00): Die Supermärkte kannst du als shop=supermarket und
building=construction 
u. z.B. name=REWE (ohne Neubau)
taggen.
Nach der Eröffnung, ersetzt du dann construction mit yes oder commercial.

Im Editor ID kannst du das Gebäude markieren und "q" drücken, dann wird das gezeichnete Gebäude schön rechtwinklig angeordnet - probiers mal. (Man sieht auch schon dir Grundrisse auf dem Satelitenbild)
TourenbikerFKB (2019-10-21 17:01:11+00:00): Verbesserungsvorschlag: für Supermärkte gibt es building=retail
blodern (2019-10-22 10:06:50+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.

Was ich leider nicht sehe, das sind die Grundrissen.. Auch wenn ich zwischen den verschiedenen Karten umschalte, sehe ich keine. 
Wie machst du das?
PT-53 (2019-10-22 11:49:19+00:00): Hallo schoka,
im Editor ID stehen verschiedene Luftbilder zur Verfügung.
Klick mal auf Hintergrundeinstellungen in der Werkzeugleiste am rechten Bildrand oder drücke die Taste B. 
Teste dann mal alle Luftbilder durch.
Das solltest Du am besten bei jeder Bearbeitung machen.
Grüße
TourenbikerFKB (2019-10-22 15:09:42+00:00): im vorliegenden Fall hat wohl Bing das aktuellste Bild. Man erkennt zumindest die Grundplatte des Gebäudes.
PT-53 (2019-10-22 15:39:04+00:00): Ja, das kann sich aber ständig ändern. Deshalb meine Empfehlung, immer alle Luftbilder zu sichten.
eggie (2019-10-21 13:25:32+00:00): review..

Dag Thomas  Zo is het juist en staat de specificatie residential er ook bij. 
De wijziging betekent dat er al aan de weg wordt gewerkt.
MVG,
Eggie
riysingh (2019-10-21 13:36:30+00:00): Hi,
I have made the edits in this changeset : 75998726 based on Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.

Regards,
riysingh.
eggie (2019-10-21 13:53:39+00:00): Kijk nog even animal_keeping=cow

Dus enkelvoud  niet cows.. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Danimal_keeping
dus bv ...= cow;sheep;horse
s©tt (2019-10-21 14:41:00+00:00): Grappig, dat had ik ook gedacht, maar "cows" en "horses" verschijnt in de dropdownlijst, dus daarom heb ik voor meervoud gekozen. Hoe dan ook - inmiddels heb ik die in enkelvoud aangepast.
cleary (2019-11-12 04:46:57+00:00): I recently surveyed along both Punchbowl Road and Nelia Bunda Road and did not see a road where you have way 737298921.

I think it is probably a fence with land cleared of vegetation on either side so that it might appear similar to a road in satellite imagery.
Aleksandar1994 (2019-11-12 15:05:52+00:00): Hello Cleary,
Thank you once again for pointing this out, I have removed way 737298921.
Best regards
rainerU (2019-10-21 16:55:43+00:00): Hallo ChrisK80,

du hast das Gebäude 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/616741133

verschoben. Du hast dich dabei auf die ESRI-Luftbilder gestützt. Diese sind aber nicht besonders aktuell. Auf den Luftbildern von Maxar, die neueren Datums sind, und auch auf den Karten von Maps4BW sieht man, dass an dieser Stelle ein neues Gebäude gebaut wurde. Es gibt dort ein schon länger bestehendes Gebäude, so wie du es jetzt positioniert hast,  und ein neues Gebäude wie der User Jo89195 es eingetragen hatte. Beachte auch, dass die Maxar-Luftbilder zwar aktueller,  aber sehr unpräzise ausgerichtet sind.

Grüße
Rainer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75999468
rainerU (2019-11-16 17:08:00+00:00): Da leider keine Rückmeldung, habe ich das gelöschte Gebäude wiederhergestellt.
viloan (2019-10-21 13:53:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-10-21 13:53:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-10-21 13:56:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!