piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jordi MF (2022-02-02 22:58:37+00:00): Hola de nuevo IWABRANT,

No soy partidario de utilizar nombres históricos de un croquis del año 1956. Actualmente, el camino recibo el simple nombre de Camí de la Serra". Si quieres mantener el nombre histórico, existe la etiqueta "old_name=*". ¿Qué opinas? Por favor, responde a alguno de los comentarios que te he hecho en tus changesets.
Saludos,
Jordi
IWBRABANT (2022-02-06 12:04:43+00:00): OK
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:18:05+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116936329
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:19:58+00:00): #TIP: A more descriptive changeset would be nice. School project doesn't really say what you are doing. You could use "school project - add wetlands"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116936402
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:23:59+00:00): #TIP: The church could have been added as a multipolygon by adding a polygon in the middle. Then select both, right click and hit the + sign.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116936461
eggie (2022-02-02 21:45:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-08 10:47:54+00:00): please fix the building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116936585
eggie (2022-02-02 21:49:24+00:00): Dag Mentam.. Wanneer je amenity=drinking_water toevoegt krijg je een symbool op de kaart.
Ik heb het zojuist toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-02 21:52:07+00:00): Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water

Voeg je het zelf toe?

MVG
eggie
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:24:33+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116936773
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:25:27+00:00): #TIP: OSM spells out street names. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you fix Benoy St?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116936930
JeroenvanderGun (2022-12-19 14:26:43+00:00): Beste Pieter,

Er is hier geen rijbaanscheiding, dus het is niet wenselijk om hier twee losse ways naast elkaar te tekenen. Het rijstrookwilsselverbod (de doorgetrokken streep) is aangegeven met de sleutel change:lanes=no|no.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:change
Jordi MF (2022-02-02 22:41:14+00:00): Hola IWBRABANT,
He modificado esta senda para etiquetarla como "path" porque una senda de montaña no es un footway. Una footway se utiliza en aquellos caminos que se han creado expresamente para ser usados únicamente por personas. Suelen estar indicadas con señales o mediante legislación (como las aceras de las ciudades): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway.

Saludos,
Jordi
IWBRABANT (2022-02-06 12:27:54+00:00): 
Cambios realizados
IWBRABANT (2022-02-06 15:13:35+00:00): D'accord. J'ai modifié en ce sens différents sentiers en "path"
Jordi MF (2022-02-07 15:06:31+00:00): Parfait!
tomhukins (2022-02-16 18:17:38+00:00): Thank you for adding the camp site's name.  I couldn't see the name signed anywhere when I mapped the site.
GrabSG_LydiaN (2022-02-11 09:42:28+00:00): Hello Laveure,
I just noticed that you changed the access to this particular road: the Road straight through Marina View is under construction and is a T-junction. From Union Street, same road is not accessible to all modes of transport except foot or bicycle. This have been verified locally by driving down to check the actual place. We are going ahead and changing it back to the previous convention. If you have any questions, please let us know.
Thank you,
Lydia
ma-rt-in (2022-02-08 18:07:06+00:00): Hallo,

wie bereits in den anderen Änderungssätzen kommentiert und hier nochmal, glaube ich nicht das du vor Ort warst und anhand eines Luftbildes kann man kein maxspeed taggen.

vg
Raa39 (2022-02-08 18:25:24+00:00): Я на грузовике езжу по Германии и помечаю себе неточности на карте.
ma-rt-in (2022-02-08 19:28:47+00:00): Ah alles klar. 
Aber das ist totzdem etwas seltsam, das auf diesem langen Abschnitt eine Höchsgeschwindigkeit für alle von 60 kmh gilt.
aber du warst ja scheinbar vor ort.
Raa39 (2022-02-08 21:58:18+00:00): Ремонт дороги
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-16 06:39:40+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009152427/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
Jordi MF (2022-02-02 23:13:41+00:00): No es necesario mapear dos veces el mismo punto. Lo Tòlec es una pequeña montaña. Lo podemos mapear como si fuese un pico (natural=peak) o como una pequeña montaña (natural=hill). Pero no deberíamos añadir los dos nodos a la vez. Elige el que consideres: "peak" o "hill".
Saludos,
Jordi
IWBRABANT (2022-02-06 12:06:05+00:00): Corrección hecha
IWBRABANT (2022-02-06 12:06:44+00:00): Corrección hecha
tomhukins (2022-03-12 17:22:05+00:00): Hi, thank you for your helpful work improving the map.  I notice you used "closed:shop" to tag the closed shop.  However, this tag is rarely used: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/closed:shop - I've amended it to the more common "disused:shop" described at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/disused:shop
Jordi MF (2022-02-02 22:56:19+00:00): Por favor,
Sigue los criterios de OpenStreetMap. En este municipio, la toponimia debe escribirse en catalán en la etiqueta "name". Si quieres añadir la traducción al castellano, utiliza la etiqueta "name:es".
Saludos,
IWBRABANT (2022-02-06 12:08:42+00:00): Hago mi mejor. No hablo catalán, valenciano ni castellano.
Jordi MF (2022-02-06 12:27:39+00:00): De acuerdo, lo entiendo. Para evitar que se acumulen errores ortográficos en OpenStreetMap i mantener la coherencia del idioma, puedes escribirme siempre que quieras para que lo revise. Estaré encantado de ayudarte.
Saludos,
Jordi
IWBRABANT (2022-02-06 15:09:57+00:00): Gracias
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:31:39+00:00): #TIP: The Slover Park Flight school should match the building outline. Instead of tagging it as an area, use building=yes. Can you fix this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116938432
Rom1 (2022-02-03 11:47:36+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé cette modification car il n'y a pas lieu de séparer l'Allée des Pommiers de l'autre voie. Merci.
ju54 (2022-02-03 11:58:26+00:00): Bonjour Rom1. Merci pour la correction.
Je cherchais un moyen d'indiquer qu'on ne peut pas rejoindre la route depuis l'Allée des Pommiers. Au bout de l'allée se trouve un portail qui interdit tout accès. J'ai ajouter les attributs à ce portail, mais OSMR continue à faire passer les itinéraires à travers ce portail.
Pouvez-vous m'aider ? Merci
Rom1 (2022-02-03 13:10:35+00:00): Peut-être qu'OSRM n'est pas encore à jour des données ?
joost schouppe (2024-11-12 15:18:05+00:00): Is there public services here? If not, we should delete the amenity tag and add office=government + police=offices
Thierry1030 (2024-11-12 15:25:02+00:00): Service trafic/Verkeersdienst + brigade cycliste/fietsbrigade
Thierry1030 (2024-11-12 15:25:17+00:00): what do you mean by "public services"?
joost schouppe (2024-11-12 16:33:22+00:00): I mean regular citizens walk in there to get stuff done from the police, or "is it a front office or a back office?"
Thierry1030 (2024-11-12 17:19:51+00:00): back office
joost schouppe (2024-11-13 09:10:06+00:00): OK thanks, fixed
surveyor54 (2022-02-02 22:51:01+00:00): CS-Ergänzung:
Gebäude nach ALKIS präzisiert.
ElliottPlack (2022-02-03 13:24:52+00:00): This edit broke the Chesapeake Bay
EP_Repair (2022-02-03 13:55:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116964666 where the changeset comment is: reverting golf course spline mapping that broke the Chesapeake Bay, deleted existing course data, and creates overlapping geometry
surveyor54 (2022-02-02 22:50:49+00:00): CS-Ergänzung:
Gebäude nach ALKIS präzisiert.
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:28:34+00:00): Is there really a pool behind the house? It doesn't show up on the latest imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116939007
OldManCelli (2022-02-14 18:47:58+00:00): Hi Ceichel, thanks for adding the speed limits. Unfortunately this changeset changed a boundary from a boundary to a highway. I think you added the speed limit to the wrong feature. I think we need to revert this change and add the speed limits to the existing roads.
BCNorwich (2022-02-05 08:27:28+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please be careful to check your editing for mistakes before uploading. This will be a lot easier if you limit the number of feature edits in each changeset. Ten is good.

There are 45 features edited in this changeset, 3 contained mistakes. It's easier to find these 3 editing mistakes in a smaller changeset.

The 3 mistakes were nodes on 3 features dragged out of alignment. I've restored the nodes to their original positions.

Regards Bernard.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:34:18+00:00): #TIP: Leave the building=yes tag to help describe the feature. Can you add it back?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116939941
user_3022894 (2022-08-15 20:06:51+00:00): Hi,
du, sorry erst mal, dass ich hier so reinplatze.
Ich wollte dich nur kurz auf eine Kleinigkeit aufmerksam machen, die mir aufgefallen ist.

Und zwar geht es um unsere Vorgehensweise in OSM beim Gebäudemapping. Wir müssen ein wenig aufpassen, dass hier nicht verschiedene Mapper aus Versehen bzw. unbeabsichtigt quasi "gegeneinander" arbeiten.

Und zwar ist mir aufgefallen, dass du ja fleißig nach dem Liegenschaftskataster ALKIS mappst. 

Grundsätzlich ist das auch sehr gut so. Allerdings, ich weiß nicht ob du darüber Bescheid weißt, es gibt so eine App für Vor-Ort-Surveys, die heißt StreetComplete.
Und diese App hat die Eigenschaft, User vor Ort nach Gebäudetypen, also einem genaueren Wert anstatt des einfachen „yes“ für „building“, fragt.

Es gibt da nun einige User, die, wenn sie für diese klassischen Anbauten von Gebäuden das gefragt werden, den Anbau einfach in den Umriss des gesamtgebäudes integrieren.

Mir ist jetzt aufgefallen, dass das in Wuppertal öfters passiert ist, u. a. vom User joel1972.
Und da ist halt der springende Punkt, dass wir her aufpassen müssen, dass nicht einer gegen den anderen arbeitet. Und zwar ist es so, dass das gebäudemapping dann nicht mehr dem Liegenschaftskataster entspricht.

Beispiel: Uellendahler Straße 132 inkl. Anbauten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14442061

Im ALKIS sind es drei gebäude, in OSM hat joel1972 darauf jetzt eins gemacht um die Anbauten in das Gesamtgebäude zu integrieren. Ich weiß nicht, finde beides irgendwie legitim.

Es geht mir allerdings darum, dass wir uns hier in Wuppertal jetzt echt dringend absprechen müssen, wie wir das machen mit den Gebäudeanbauten. Ansonsten gibt es hier ein Durcheinander, weil der eine nach ALKIS mappt und der andere mit StreetComplete und dann wird es hin- und hergeändert.

Schönes Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233268018/history
Ein von dir nach ALKIS angepasstes Gebäude, von joel1972 gelöscht und in die Hausnummer 10 hineinintegriert.

Ich möchte jetzt natürlich niemandem die Schuld in die Schuhe schieben oder so etwas.

Allerdings denke ich, dass ein Dialog hier wichtig wäre. Ich habe joel1972 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124683124 auf die Problematik aufmerksam gemacht und ihm zumindest building:part an die Hand gegeben, eventuell könnte man es darüber lösen.

Wie gesagt, es ist halt so, dass u. U. mit ALKIS Gemapptes sonst wieder umgeändert wird, weil man nicht alle Gebäudegrenzen usw. von außen sieht oder sich nicht einig ist, was jetzt „ein gebäude“ ist und was nicht.

Eventuell magst du dich mit dem (hauptsächlich) betroffenen User, bei dem mir das echt aufgefallen ist, per Nachricht oder so mal kurzschließen?

Dankende Grüße
Lukas
Leo Slager (2022-02-04 23:28:40+00:00): Dag Teek,
je hebt hier zoveel verwijderd van de kaart dat er een groot wit vlak is achter gebleven.
Dat zal niet de bedoeling zijn geweest.
Hier kun je de ravage zien:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116940114
Ik overweeg de complete changeset te reverten.
Graag een reactie.

Overigens is het gebruik van  Bing als achtergrond een verkeerde keuze. De foto licht soms zwaar verschoven t.o.v. de werkelijkheid en is dus feitelijk onbruikbaar om iets in te tekenen. Iedere meer ervaren mapper in NL gebruikt daarvoor de pdok 7.5cm luchtfoto. Die is ontschrankt zodat de foto overeenkomt met de werkelijkheid.
Teek (2022-02-06 22:44:32+00:00): Hi leo, bedankt ik zal afmaken waar ik mee bezig ben. Revert t maar niet dan kan alles nog een keer.
ArmchairHouseInterpolater (2022-02-03 12:02:34+00:00): How did you spot a postbox inside tesco with streetlevel or aerial photography?
AntV (2022-02-03 23:47:32+00:00): I took a photo of the box in store (and could see part of the car park outside in the image) and then used the Street level imagery to work out whereabouts the box was along the front of the store in relation to the car parking aisles. I then used the aerial photography to work out how deep into the store the box was. I reckon I've got it about right as my phone GPS is unreliable indoors
ivanbranco (2022-02-04 17:31:39+00:00): What's happening here? You restored a node as a charging station in Deutschland, then you moved it to Austria as a tree, what's the reason apart from being "funny"?
Emilius123 (2022-02-04 23:37:12+00:00): Nothing, I just felt like it.
Awoobis (2023-09-04 18:31:28+00:00): That's hilarious
Emilius123 (2023-09-05 06:05:13+00:00): I know, thanks. Wish I also had a funny changeset number, but that was too much waiting for me.
diamondarmorsteve (2024-09-06 02:08:09+00:00): Nice
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
Adam_Piszczek (2023-02-23 11:00:10+00:00): Nazwy się nie podaje bo nawet jej tam nie ma a oznaczasz wyznanie roman_catholic a nie catholic bo to by było bardziej do polskokatolickiego kościoła,potem są błędy na mapie z kościołami.
pan_borsuk (2023-02-24 11:46:09+00:00): o widzisz. dziękuję za doprecyzowanie. choć na przyszłość było by lepiej wskazać konkretny punkt/linię czego dotyczy problem :-)
zstadler (2022-02-07 13:23:34+00:00): שלום יובל,


ברוך הבא לקהילת הממפים של
OSM
ותודה על העידכונים שהכנסת!

בעריכה זו וגם לפניה הענקת למספר דרכים את השם:
שביל ישראל - מקטע 26

המיפוי עושה הבחנה בין שם של הדרך, ממש כמו שם של רחוב, לבין המסלולים שעוברים בה.

בחלקים רבים של שביל ישראל הוא חופף לשביל גולני ולפעמים גם לשבילים אחרים. במידה רבה של הגזמה, זה דומה להפרדה בין שם של רחוב למספריהם של קווי האוטובוס שעוברים בו

המיפוי של מסלולים נעשה על ידי הוספתם ליחסים. כך ממופה שביל ישראל המלא, שבילי הליכה, שבילי אופניים ואפילו מספר מסלולי תחבורה 
 ציבורית

על מנת שלא לאבד את המיפוי שבצעת לקטע 26, יצרתי ממנו יחס של שביל איזורי ואת פרטיו תוכל לראות בדף
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13770304

תודה רבה על המאמץ!
זאב
zstadler (2022-05-26 11:15:50+00:00): תוקן
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:38:30+00:00): Did you mean to name the waterfall "Umtanum Falls Park" - shouldn't it just be Umtanum Falls? If there is a park you could add a polygon for the park area. Can you review this edit? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116942104
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:43:14+00:00): #TIP: Driveways are tagged as highway=service + service=driveway. Can you change road you added?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116942141
stragu (2022-02-04 02:41:44+00:00): Thanks! I separated the traffic lights to the actual stopping points so it wouldn't be double-counted by routing software when coming from Beaudesert road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116986624
Fizzie-DWG (2022-02-04 02:44:41+00:00): Yep, I also much prefer having the lights on the stop line, rather than out in the middle of the intersection.
EP_Repair (2022-02-03 16:30:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116971105 where the changeset comment is: reverted mass-deletion of paths and features around Seoul. Please do not delete everything on the map without discussing the edit with the community first.
lasagna (2022-02-04 04:07:38+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your first two changesets (this one and 116928135) have some good additions, but unfortunately caused some problems by moving several road segments, and some parts of the boundaries of Oceanside and Vista, far away from where they should be.

I had to revert those two changesets, and then I tried to re-insert the buildings that you added correctly.

In your future editing, please check that you have not accidentally moved features that you did not plan to edit.

Also, please add descriptive comments to your changes ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments ).

Thanks
CoyKoi (2022-02-15 21:07:29+00:00): Hey ralley just FYI this changeset added some buildings which no longer exist. Unfortunately the building import dataset is built from fairly old imagery (~2017) predating the busway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116942919
ralley (2022-02-15 21:35:29+00:00): Arghh sorry about that, I've been checking against the Maxar imagery and somehow missed that these were in the construction area.  I will clean up
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116942919
ralley (2022-02-15 21:43:37+00:00): Cleaned up with  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117452512
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116942919
py_berrard (2022-02-09 16:40:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9470361558 n'existe pas ou plus
Nordpfeil (2022-02-04 12:04:45+00:00): Ché guilemmal, 
podés echar un vistazo a la Ruta Nacional 40 dónde pusiste la etiqueta "El Borbollón;Jocolí;Lavalle;San Juan;La Rioja = Las Heras"
guillemmal (2022-02-04 12:09:05+00:00): Perdón, ese igual se me fue al tipear. Ya está corregido, necesitas que mire algo más?
Gajoed (2022-02-03 04:20:54+00:00): Mohon perbaikan dari teman teman jika ada yang salah
adiatmad (2022-02-04 06:12:08+00:00): Menurut saya sudah bagus Pak. Lengkap informasinya.
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:21:04+00:00): #TIP: you removed the tag building=yes. It should remain along with your sports centre tag. Can you add it back?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116944072
Glassman (2022-02-03 18:41:10+00:00): #TIP: tag parking as amenity=parking then draw in the service road that goes to or through the parking lot. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116944144
szydzio (2022-02-03 07:49:05+00:00): Dzięki! Chyba musiał być jakiś problem przy uploadzie zestawu 116869499, bo mimo, że uzupełniłem tylko tag name, JOSM przesunął delikatnie wszystkie węzły z way-a 226313851...
b-jazz (2022-02-04 04:13:27+00:00): Can you take another look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305780252 ? Something bad happened with your latest change. Thx.
muzirian (2022-02-03 10:54:58+00:00): nice work :)
JJIglesias (2022-02-03 22:30:35+00:00): Esta muy bien que agregues un area de Campamento, pero a menos q esa area sea una zona de Camping PRIVADA, No le corresponde el Nombre de "Soy Travel", si es una zona privada entonces falta el Nombre del Operador, Telefono de Contacto y otros datos de Camping, como facilidades, baños. etc.

Una forma muy efectiva de contribuir al mapa es usando las aplicaciones STREETCOMPLETE y MAPILLARY (que son fotos q se usan para mejorar el mapa, tipo Streetview) Te recomiendo usarlas.
Gracias
ovruni (2022-02-03 06:41:39+00:00): Hola soycarlospozo, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se cambió el nombre de la "Avenida Chulucanas" a "Avenida Raúl Mata La Cruz", sin embargo dado que hay entidades que conocen a la avenida con el otro nombre es que he recuperando el nombre anterior como alt_name. Para cualquier duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, tenemos un canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe y una lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
Lee Carré (2022-02-04 10:08:12+00:00): 👍🙂
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-03 05:44:10+00:00): jodie1974 is sockpuppet of soukkad2003, munger2002 etc.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-03 05:49:08+00:00): jodie1974 is sockpuppet of soukkad2003, munger2002 etc.
BCNorwich (2022-02-04 09:13:42+00:00): Hi, You dragged 50 nodes out of place on Way: Nottingham (38387623). I've returned them as best I can.

Regards Bernard.
VlIvYur (2022-02-11 08:56:18+00:00): Hello
Have no idea how this happened.Thanks a lot.Hope no more broken changes there
Glassman (2022-02-04 16:56:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: Save and upload your edit before moving to a distant location.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116946631
murble (2022-03-28 13:57:36+00:00): Did you actually survey this?, You appear to have removed the oneway:bicycle=no on park row.
Mr7766335 (2022-03-28 14:50:30+00:00): Hi, there is no specific cycle lane on this road, for definite.
murble (2022-03-28 15:02:36+00:00): There is a specific bike entrance turning from Castle Street, but oneway:bicycle=no is not related to the existence or not of cycle lanes.
Maria Bombardil (2022-04-03 10:40:01+00:00): landuse:governmental 是OSMChina Telegram群实验的要素标识，已在tracestrack上实现渲染，请勿再次更改要素为商务用地。
svocea (2022-02-03 06:50:42+00:00): local Lami Town Council recognizes this stretch of road as Marine Drive for rate payers
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-07 15:48:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5282141 - rozumiem że on dalej nie działa jako kościół?
Lee Carré (2022-02-04 10:40:01+00:00): [Following on from discussion in http://www.osm.org/changeset/116431437 ]

Ah, I didn't even think of the possibility of marking it as abandoned. Good idea 👍.

Though, from reading the wiki & querying TagInfo, abandoned=highway (especially combined with highway=*) is uncommon (~200 instances) compared to abandoned:highway=* (~50,000 instances).

Though, I'm unfamiliar, having not tagged anything as abandoned, before.

I presume there's a good reason for favouring abandoned=highway(?)
DianaDemchuk (2022-02-04 12:00:05+00:00): Yes, I changed to a newer tag. The old case also looks valid, but it is already considered obsolete. Here is the article   https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned      

Therefore, I am attaching a new chenset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=116948247#map=20/49.19306/-2.09672

Thanks for your attention. Together we will make the map better!
voltairovicz (2022-02-03 11:55:20+00:00): Diamentowy to może być twój ban w osmie