piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-07-04 14:57:14+00:00): Oke... Je zou van het vlak een parkeerplaats  kunnen maken en dan kan die node eraf.
RicoElectrico (2018-04-07 17:52:53+00:00): Cześć, czy te nazwy "Błażejów Boczna" są oznaczone tabliczkami w terenie?
topolusitania (2017-06-30 15:47:59+00:00): Olá
Uma pergunta/ dúvida:
Devem ser desenhados os rastos que os pivots de rega circular deixam no terreno ? Afinal não são caminhos de circulação "normais" .
ViriatoLusitano (2017-06-30 16:00:57+00:00): Penso que não, experimentei com a ideia de que o rasto criado dá para ser atravessado em contraste com a área cultivada mas em princípio vou retirar estes caminhos.
Slartir (2017-08-15 16:44:42+00:00): Der offizielle Altmühlradweg zwischen Zimmern und Solnhofen läuft auf der anderen Flußseite! Die Wegoberflächen wechseln in diesem Abschnitt auf der rechten Altmühlseiten zwischen Pflaster, Schotter und Asphalt.. D.h. zuvor wäre es richtiger gewesen.
Kalaallit Nunaat (2017-07-02 17:25:01+00:00): Bonjour, votre changeset a créé un grand nombre de voies dupliquées sur Carpentras. Utilisez le validateur avant d'envoyer vos contributions. Il y a au minimum 95 chemins dupliqués et 358 noeuds de route dupliqués.
Un retour arrière sur votre changeset s'impose.
GillouC (2017-07-03 07:22:44+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est ma première contribution sous OSM et j'ai encore un peu de mal à en saisir toute la complexité. Pouvez-vous m'indiquer comment faire un "retour en arrière du changeset" svp ?
Cordialement,
JLZIMMERMANN (2017-07-04 22:55:23+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suis en train de faire une requête sur ce groupe de modification. Tu travaille pour la COVE ?
Jean-Louis
GillouC (2017-07-05 12:10:42+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui c'est Gilles de la CoVe. Je me lance sur les lignes de bus avec JOSM. Je pensais avoir tout bien saisi mais apparemment l'import a entraîné des doublons. Il faut que je me documente un peu mieux...
RoterEmil (2017-10-19 22:56:07+00:00): Hallo '@55', leider hast Du nicht auf die Fragen in der note (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1048056) geantwortet. Auch sind Deine beiden Einträge nicht nachvollziehbar. Deshalb sind sie nun gelöscht. OSM ist ein gemeinschaftliches Projekt, das immer auch Kommunikation bedeutet. Falls die beiden Einträge also doch so stimm(t)en, dann antworte z.B. auf diesen Kommentar. Schönen Gruß
user_5359 (2017-07-01 06:59:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t use area=yes for a building, use building=yes
RicoElectrico (2017-06-30 16:13:08+00:00): Cześć, prostokątne budynki wypadałoby prostować, jest od tego opcja w menu pod obiektem - albo prościej klawiszem S.

Możesz też powiedzieć co jest z budynkami 107-113, 103-97 i 81-87? One też chyba wymagają poprawy położenia.
krzysztofb88 (2017-06-30 21:02:13+00:00): Cześć, poprawiłem kształt budynków oraz przesunąłem kolejne. Jak będę miał więcej czasu to postaram się dokończyć resztę widocznego osiedla.
eggie (2017-06-30 15:43:10+00:00): What is your intention whit this edit?
Reverted due to ignorance.
Polarbear-repair (2017-07-25 09:40:54+00:00): Do not map insignificant perishable objects, that violates 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features

The node has been weeded.
literan (2017-07-01 11:47:06+00:00): Пожалуйста, не надо спамить. Откатываю.
Александр Абрамов (abramov_wedding) (2017-07-01 11:53:06+00:00): Где спам? Тут мой офис.
literan (2017-07-01 11:59:53+00:00): во всех трех местах одновременно? К тому же вы поставили тег фотомагазина/фотостудии
MKnight (2017-07-01 11:31:51+00:00): Moin, hier ist bei den Öffnungszeiten irgendwas schiefgelaufen, kannst Du das nochmal prüfen und ggf. korrigieren?
Laatsch (2017-07-01 17:31:02+00:00): Hallo, mach ich. Wir sind aber grade mit dem Zelt unterwegs und mein Internet ist sauschlecht. Sobald ich vernünftig nachsehen kann, schau ich noch mal rein.

Es war offen Montag bis Sonnabend durchgehend und Sonntag mit Mittagspause.

Danke für den Hinweis,
Stephan

PS: zumindest weiß ich, dass meine Änderung von Osmand wirklich angekommen ist :-)
MKnight (2017-07-01 19:54:04+00:00): ähnlich verwürfelte Zeiten hab ich schon des Öfteren gesehen, und wenn ich mich recht entsinne jedes Mal von Osmand.

da ich Osmand nur für Routing nutze, kann ich leider nicht eingrenzen, wo solche Fehler genau entstehen.
RicoElectrico (2017-07-03 23:22:31+00:00): Autor uwagi twierdzi, że to nie jest wysypisko: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1051947#map=18/50.03239/20.06216
user_4493657 (2017-07-04 00:19:51+00:00): http://recykling.miki.krakow.pl Wygląda na sortownię odpadów.
gileri (2017-06-30 21:00:12+00:00): Bonjour,

Comme indiqué dans mes changesets précédents, ce n'est pas nécessaire d'avoir addr:postcode et addr:city pour la plupart des villes françaises. Les limites administratives sont présentes dans OSM, et sont utilisées par la plupart des logiciels.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2017-07-03 07:03:28+00:00): Bonjour,

Désolé pour le désagrément, nous allons rectifier ce problème.
MCDA (2017-06-30 15:55:15+00:00): Shouldn't this be on the node where you leave the roundabout and join the M5?  Currently it's on the node where you leave the M5 and join the roundabout.
MCDA (2017-06-30 16:00:30+00:00): Please see - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction
literan (2017-07-01 12:20:48+00:00): не совсем понял задумку - зачем area:highway на линейном объекте? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504247104
GinaroZ (2017-06-30 23:52:12+00:00): Why did you remove junction=roundabout from this roundabout? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56133698
Hjart (2017-06-30 16:08:45+00:00): In DK it's legal to walk on a cycleway unless there is a footway right next to it, so adding foot=yes here isn't really needed
hyggemap (2017-06-30 16:59:37+00:00): I did not know OSM tags followed the DK law, thank you for telling me!
Hjart (2017-06-30 17:03:52+00:00): Well, most routers I've tried allows pedestrians on cycleways. For other types of roads see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1124103
AsgerFrank (2017-07-01 19:29:22+00:00): Also, it follows from  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Denmark
hyggemap (2017-07-01 20:07:13+00:00): Thank you both for the links!
Rom1 (2017-06-30 20:13:41+00:00): Hi, sorry but you're wrong. All bicycle paths are already mapped in Nancy. Look at the tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14965010/
xtianetkti (2017-11-22 10:11:13+00:00): L'amphithéâtre Valade est toujours là.
Pouvez-vous le remettre ?
Merci.
GerdP (2017-08-24 13:10:17+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
You have mapped some highway=unpaved
here. The surface of the road should be mapped with surface=unpaved while
highway should specify the importance of the road.
eggie (2017-06-30 17:31:30+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12  

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link "meld u aan om mee te praten" om een reactie te geven in deze changeset.

MVG, 
Eggie
karitotp (2017-06-30 18:59:45+00:00): Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap, you added name:de and name:hr (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/651963087), but according the translation them does not match with the name tag. Could you please confirm if these name are correct? Thank you 
Karito
RicoElectrico (2017-07-04 00:45:27+00:00): To chyba jest błąd - adres wylądował z budynku na przystanku: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3445247535
nammala (2017-07-06 07:28:40+00:00): Hi mjb91409,

Could you please confirm the name of the roads you have been adding which seems pretty strange. It would you great if you can confirm the changes.

Best Regards,
nammala
mbaumfalk (2017-07-06 12:55:06+00:00): I primarily used the TIGER Roads Overlay in JOSM as the source for the road names, but I also know from visiting the area numerous times that the roads use the alphabet on the east-west roads and numbers mostly divisible by 100 on the north-south roads. Is there any particular way you would like me to confirm the names of the roads?
nammala (2017-07-06 13:14:09+00:00): Thanks for getting back. I don't have any particular local knowledge regarding the names. I just found the names are random due to the alphabets and numbers. It would be great if you can ask local community help in reviewing the names of the roads
oormilavinod (2017-07-03 06:56:43+00:00): hey Сержик welcome to osm. i noticed that you have removed the tag details of some features. could you pleas e add the source you used thnks. happy mapping
BIG JAM (2017-06-30 17:52:57+00:00): 메모 수정 : 쌍암공원 수정
nyuriks (2017-09-05 00:51:19+00:00): Hi, it seems like the data for http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4943267293 is a duplicate and incomplete. Similar one is  http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4724280996
I'm deleting it.
5m4u9 (2017-06-30 23:45:25+00:00): gracias por contribuir, y más desde OSMAND!

:D te olvidaste de añadir la categoría de hospital (segundo campo), ya lo corregí

cualquier duda ahí estamos para solucionar !
Commodoortje (2017-07-01 09:39:15+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-07-01 09:39:57+00:00): Ik heb inmiddels de naam op de relatie geplaatst.
mavl (2017-07-02 15:20:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту OpenStreetMap [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
В этом пакете правок вы добавили супермаркет «Абсолют». Этот супермаркет располагается в жилом доме и вряд ли является супермаркетом в том смысле, который используется в OpenStreetMap. В OpenStreetMap супермаркетом считаются большие магазины (в Тюмени это «Лента», «Окей» и некоторые другие):  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop=supermarket?uselang=ru  

Если какой-либо маленький магазин просто называет себя супермаркетом, то в OpenStreetMap он не считается супермаркетом. Он считается обычным магазином (shop=convenience). В OpenStreetMap имеет значение фактическое положение дел. Названия не влияет на способ обозначения магазинов и других объектов.  
  
Чтобы ответить на это сообщение, вам нужно перейти по ссылке на сайт OpenStreetMap. Затем войти под своей учётной записью и написать комментарий на сайте в пустое поле в разделе "Обсуждение".  
  
Если у вас возникли какие-либо вопросы, то вы можете задать их на форуме [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21].  
На форуме есть тема о Тюменской области [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=7083].
mavl (2017-07-02 15:26:43+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту OpenStreetMap [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
В этом пакете правок была добавлена детская площадка. В этом месте уже обозначена спортивная площадка. Вероятно, детская площадка добавлена по ошибке. На спутниковом снимке в этом месте не видно детских площадок. Только школьная спортивная площадка. Ваши изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-03-28 12:16:25+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1726785 ?
Andreas Binder (2017-06-30 19:41:59+00:00): Diese Änderung ist unnötig. Der Weg war bereits mittels "bicycle=designated" für Radfahrer freigeben. Was war der Grund für die Änderung?
Glassman (2017-07-01 01:41:31+00:00): I removed the meadow - only features that can be verified on the ground should be added.
yeskela (2017-10-02 09:09:59+00:00): На развязке у Новочеркасска работы начались.
oormilavinod (2017-07-03 06:01:31+00:00): Proudy112  hey Slimane Ben Miled , welcome to OSM. i just observed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
TourenbikerFKB (2017-07-03 07:33:21+00:00): vorsichtshalber eine Ergänzung:: das ist kein Park, sondern ein privater Garten, der als Gebäude gemappt wurde und einen node mit "leisure=garden" enthält.  @Proudy112: Auf jeden Fall ist "building" falsch und muß deshalb gelöscht werden. Ob man private Gärten mappen sollte? Aus meiner Sicht gibt es wichtigeres zu tun :-)
Commodoortje (2017-07-01 07:21:30+00:00): Hallo kabot,
Je zou kunnen overwegen om het postagentschap als losse node te plaatsen. Op de positie in het pand.
Als voorbeeld:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3488541158
ma-rt-in (2017-07-01 07:40:52+00:00): Morgen,

warum hast du den Hydrant 2899609908 verschoben?
HaPe (2017-07-01 18:48:06+00:00): Sorry, war keine Absicht. Bitte schieb ihn wieder zurück.
ma-rt-in (2017-07-03 18:48:10+00:00): ist gemacht
HaPe (2017-07-03 20:34:16+00:00): Vielen Dank. Bitte noch mal um Entschuldigung.
ma-rt-in (2017-07-03 20:36:36+00:00): kein problem , passiert halt mal
kyjay (2019-08-26 23:11:49+00:00): I've been editing the Junaluska area some recently, and I can't really find much confirming the existence of this meadow- at least, the name that you put on it. Do you have a source for it, or is it just a local name that might not be documented anywhere?
naoliv (2017-11-23 16:19:43+00:00): Olá, iedomachado. Obrigado pelas suas colaborações.
Você acabou alterando a classificação de Catuji nesta sua edição.
A classificação das cidades é dada pela sua população.
Uma cidade classificada como "village" não significa que seja uma vila de fato, mas apenas que possui uma população menor do que 10 mil habitantes.
Dê uma olhada em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:place#Brasil para mapear corretamente os locais em suas futuras edições.
oormilavinod (2017-07-03 05:56:11+00:00): @lunicotoro welcome to OSM i notice that you have been adding parks over buildings. please make sure you add value to the map. happy mapping
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-21 12:04:37+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء عدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only.
oormilavinod (2017-07-03 05:48:56+00:00): @lunicotoro welcome to OSM i notice that you have been adding parks over buildings. please make sure you add value to the map. happy mapping
Constable (2017-07-02 11:16:52+00:00): Hi there, what does this things mean?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504304845 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4367395372
This whole area is not a park, the park is already mapped where Piazza da Vinci is located.
Thanks
Alecs01 (2017-07-02 19:20:01+00:00): Clearly not a park, it mostly covers the university, reverted
johsin18 (2017-07-27 16:12:48+00:00): @lunicotoro You have added a building on top of all the other existing buildings. And the FHNW does not occupy the whole area, just a small part of it.  What was your motivation for this change?
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-01 05:56:16+00:00): You update "name" to "מרכז מסחרי כפר ורדים" but you forgot to update "name:he". 

I know this is annoying, I plan to automate these updates in the future.
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-01 05:58:05+00:00): You have a parking node inside a polygon tagged with "area". If the entire area is a parking, you should simply put all the tags on the polygon and remove the center node.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504306717
DD1GJ (2017-07-02 08:38:13+00:00): Teil-Revert der Bäume, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49954631
user_5359 (2017-07-01 17:43:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! building=school doesn’t means there exists a school (use amenity=school, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool)
user_5359 (2017-07-01 17:44:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add the address from the changeset comment to the building.
DD1GJ (2017-07-02 07:20:18+00:00): Hallo ickeberlin, gerade in Großstadten sind solche Bäume ein wichtiger Bestandteil des Stadtbildes und es gibt dafür das Zusatz-Tag denotation=urban. Ich habe daher Deine Löschungen zurückgesetzt.
karitotp (2017-07-03 19:34:24+00:00): Hi John Petito, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing. Could you please specify if the value of the power tag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4249843675) is tower or pole? Thank you
Karito
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-07-02 05:53:01+00:00): Mistake here: "NGCP Visayas Grid" should be "NGCP Luzon Grid"
*Martin* (2018-06-01 07:35:26+00:00): Ahoj Mirec,

K ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504319939 - staci dat jedno access=no, netreba na kazdy sposob zvlast. A ked je cesta vo vystavbe, tak ma byt highway=counstruction, construction=residential a nedavat do name "vo vystavbe". Prosim oprav.
Mirecnet (2018-06-02 02:39:33+00:00): Dik za upozornenie. Bola to len poznamka ku komplexnejsej stavbe servisnych  a zachranarskych ciest, ktore sa buduju uz 8 rokov ! Ked som tam pred rokom  bol a meral to, tak tam este behali bagre a v tazkom bahnistom terene prerazali  servisnu cestu pre dialnicu a tunel dialnice D1. Potom celu dialnicu a vystavbu ciest zastavili pre EIA a zabudlo sa na to...
DD1GJ (2017-07-11 19:33:39+00:00): Hallo L1808, gehörst Du auch zu der Geomatikerklasse? Falls ja: Kontrolliert der Lehrer überhaupt, was gemacht wird? In OSM sind korrekte Tags sehr wichtig, damit alles weltweit einheitlich maschinell ausgewertet werden kann. Eigennamen wie Scheune, Garage, Spielplatz, Kleingarten, Streuobstwiese, ... sind völlig fehl am Platz. Räum da bitte noch auf.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
GerdP (2017-08-31 07:20:19+00:00): Hi!
Please review unusual highway=* on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504326309
I assume you meant something like highway=service + access=no + psv=yes
to map a way that can only be used by public transport ?
andersoal (2017-09-01 03:18:30+00:00): Hey GerdP[http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/GerdP], my mistake. I review and made a change like you said
nammala (2017-07-03 05:28:41+00:00): Hi mchambe,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world , data added and present on the map should be ground truth. Noticed that you have been adding footways for the tracks . Refer wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway for better classification of highways and also observed that there are ways which are not properly traced and edited. Please make sure to edit those and make better edits on Map.
Let us know if you need anything regarding mapping.

regards,
nammala
user_5359 (2017-07-01 16:23:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Unfortunately there exists no bridge in the OSM data.But you mean the road does not cross the river Manson Mill Creek? If so, the road must be divided. 

If you need help: You are welcome!!
beemerphile (2017-07-01 17:57:59+00:00): There was a bridge which was destroyed over 30 years ago.  The center of the missing bridge is one of the corners of my property.  East Jones Chapel Road has been abandoned by the county government at the 861 address by virtue of over 20 years of disuse.  It is not possible to travel from East Jones Chapel to Phillips Road, though all mapping programs route through there.  The map should show an open gap between the two roads..
beemerphile (2017-07-01 17:58:25+00:00): I do not know how to make the map edits.
freebeer (2017-07-02 09:18:31+00:00): Hi there, lover of BMW...

I have just saved the first of several edits to clean up this area based on aerial orthophotography, even though I know some to be years or decades out of date.

This area is not mapped to the standards we can find elsewhere, because most data I looked at was imported rough data from many years back with guaranteed inaccuracies.  I can see from Bing imagery that the Chapel road turns into an unpaved/unmaintained path or trail at the point I added a service drive and some private barns/houses/whatnot.  

Similarly Phillips Road south of this newly-added bridge-that-doesn't-exist.
However, there is a service drive mapped off Phillips Road, hidden by trees if it does exist...

Anyway, with only aerial images to guide me and obscured by treecover, I cannot accurately assess the road surface or access restrictions.  It would not surprise me if it is physically possible to drive with auto partway towards the not-bridge from both sides, even if it is not officially marked as private or closed, and likely possible to walk all the way to the Creek.  

Therefore I won't delete myself the path or trail, and will instead rely on a local mapper to add the correct access for cycles, wanderers, and autos, or to adjust the length should it be impassably overgrown before reaching the ex-bridge.

Which newly-added bridge in OpenStreetMap should be deleted, if no evidence of it remains (foundations or whatnot).  Which I won't do from halfway around the world out of respect for the honourable 5359.

I thank you most heartily for your contribution to OSM, and hope in return you have spurred me to add some more detail to your area and likely property that also benefits OSM.

The problem with routing should disappear when the bridge is adjusted to reflect reality or the trails I changed given appropriate access tags to allow the random walker to hunt crawdaddies in the crik (wait, I don't even know what part of the world I'm editing here...) but to keep through-traffic at bay.  That is, when the routing data is derived from OSM, which it may not be...

If you do not know how to edit the map in such detail, feel free to make comments here to point out where the mapped details do not match the on-the-ground reality and need corrections, and I'm sure a more advanced mapper than myself, still a mere beginner unsure of how to tag all the additions I may add, can correctly fix things for you.

But now, it's time to see how much more motivation I can muster up to add more missing detail around your neck of the woods (which outlines itself needs work).

Thanks again for your input, and hope to see you continue to contribute to OSM!

Cheers...
freebeer (2017-07-02 09:22:06+00:00): Look here "freebeer" (IF that is your real name), if you can't keep comments short, at least spend that wasted time doodling and scrawling over our beloved map so we don't have to read your pathetic drivel.
Signed, a fan (NOT)
beemerphile (2017-07-02 11:08:36+00:00): Commenting only on your edit and not your editorial, the rock abutments of the missing bridge still exist.  The road is private property (mine) beginning at the left turn where E Jones Chapel ends, though it continues 150 feet past my entrance where there is a barricade.  The former road past the barricade is again private property (no trespassing).
user_5359 (2017-07-02 13:12:01+00:00): Can I help one of you?
beemerphile (2017-07-02 16:38:21+00:00): Hi.  My objective was to have the connection between East Jones Chapel Rd. and Phillips Rd. shown as permanently impassable because of a bridge out.  GPS programs route through here and cause significant confusion.
bhousel (2017-07-02 17:57:14+00:00): Thanks @beemerphile, I marked the bridge as `highway=destroyed` and `destroyed:highway=track`.  This along with the `access=no` tag should prevent OSM-based routers from sending cars down the road.  (They should not route traffic along `highway=track` anyway).
beemerphile (2017-07-02 18:00:05+00:00): many thanks!