piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-07-20 17:26:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:43:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
GOwin (2018-08-14 05:51:41+00:00): Hola @jenjerejen I found one of your edits! 

Your description includes information about the floor where the space is found, and therefore you could've added that as a tag
`addr:floor=2` (British-style counting, ground floor is level 0) , or alternativeley, `level=2`

That information is very useful for indoor mapping, although many mobile apps don't support visualization of that. The floor level should still appear as a regular tag though.
mavl (2018-07-20 15:39:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:25:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:40:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Supaplex (2019-02-07 15:38:01+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2018-07-20 13:46:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
robert (2018-07-23 22:01:59+00:00): Did you mean to delete Fishermans Walk in this edit?
Adamsimon333 (2018-07-24 06:56:21+00:00): Hi Robert,

I'm not sure what I meant to add or delete.

I was trying to build a cycle map of shoreham but found the software very frustrating and hard to understand how to work it.

Probably didn't mean to delete anything.
eggie (2018-06-18 14:54:10+00:00): Een veel ouder account, maar nu pas bewerrkingen.. daarom.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
..review volgt..
eggie (2018-06-18 15:04:25+00:00): Vaak is het zo dat er een uitzondering is voor tweewielers..
-dan extra toevoegen
oneway:bicycle=no
en evt. i.v.t. 
oneway:moped=no
Graag reactie
eggie (2018-06-18 16:03:03+00:00): Hoi.. Niet zelf adressen aanmaken in OSM, maar gebruik maken van de al aanwezige BAG adresnodes van het Kadaster. Ik heb de info overgezet naar de adresnode.
Naast religion hoort er ook nog denomination= .... ? (dus de "richting") bij de moskee, kerk of sjoel.
pindab0ter (2018-06-18 18:22:29+00:00): Ik had gebruik gemaakt van de al aanwezige marker voor de locatie. Wat had ik moeten doen?
eggie (2018-06-18 18:32:32+00:00): Je had een aparte node gemaakt, maar je had de info op de reeds aanwezige node kunnen bijtaggen.
Wat ik heb gedaan is de info gekopieerd naar de adresnode. dat doe ik met toets R in potlatch2. In JOSM doe je dat met toets M. (merge)  iD is al een kleine ramp op zich. Overweeg om over te stappen naar JOSM. Die heeft een foutenanalyse en zal je waarschuwen bij upload.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Wanneer je nog veagen hebt stel ze gerust..
Groet
Eggie
eggie (2018-06-18 18:33:01+00:00): Dus 2 nodes op elkaar is niet de bedoeling.
eggie (2018-06-18 18:34:25+00:00):  Dit was mijn edit.. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59950006
eggie (2018-06-18 18:37:21+00:00): Volgens mij kun je in idee op het tabblad "alle tags" klikken en dan op de +  .. dan kun je zelf  regels toevoegen.
eggie (2018-06-18 15:06:52+00:00): .. of incline=down erbij moet heb ik m'n vraagtekens, maar je trap staat erop.
eggie (2018-06-18 15:14:58+00:00): Dag EnteteX, Geef het even door aan het kadaster, want bij de eerstvolgende update zit de schuur weer in OSM. Gewoon op het potloodje klikken.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=steggerdaweg%2087&resultOffset=0&objectId=0098100000030511&geometry.x=202301.64040052&geometry.y=542046.2005982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0098100000030511
MVG,
eggie
Baloo Uriza (2018-06-22 00:08:30+00:00): Doesn't look bad, but lanes shouldn't be used on laneless streets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59948539
SProvost (2018-06-26 14:04:20+00:00): Thanks for your feedback Paul.  It's actually the first time I create new features in OSM, I normally only edit existing ones. So all constructive feedback is welcome.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59948539
Baloo Uriza (2018-06-30 14:57:14+00:00): At least in the US and Canada, there's an understanding that the only time lanes=* should be tagged on a street with no painted lanes is where the lines are missing due to lack of maintenance.  These streets, lanes=2 isn't appropriate because there's no lanes nor evidence that lanes were ever painted.
bhousel (2018-06-30 16:14:02+00:00): It's totally ok to add lanes tags to laneless streets.
Baloo Uriza (2018-06-30 18:06:31+00:00): That really seems a lot like just making stuff up at that point, bhousel.
MikeN (2018-07-01 10:37:30+00:00): I also don't know of a convention in the US and Canada where it is incorrect to add lanes to stripeless roads.
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-01 11:49:29+00:00): How is it not geofiction to do so?
MikeN (2018-07-01 18:27:52+00:00): It explicitly models the road as 2 traffic flows where normal size vehicles pass each other, as well as differentiating from 1 lane roads where one vehicle would need to back up to an opening to pass.
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-01 18:42:55+00:00): Except on streets like this, that's not really reliably possible when someone's parked on one or both sides of the street unless you're on something singletrack.  You make a strong argument for tagging width=* after measuring it, though.
jgon6 (2018-06-18 16:06:00+00:00): The houses added are very close to being square, but the corners are slightly off. When mapping buildings it's best to square them. This can be done by selecting the outline, right-clicking, and selecting the square icon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59948548
jgon6 (2018-06-18 16:07:57+00:00): Another thing is for houses they should be tagged as building=house if possible.
Osm1980 (2018-07-13 12:30:39+00:00): salam
dar mahdoodeye shahri maknkaee ba name kooye...va shahrake... ba tage neighborhood
moshakhas mishe.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood
R0bst3r (2018-06-19 07:05:08+00:00): Hallo Mapper,
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Shop=farm kann an einen Punkt wie auch einen Umriss gesetzt werden.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59948844
mueschel (2018-06-19 18:02:01+00:00): Hi,
it looks like this import of data went wrong. Most of the objects have only strange tags like the ones below.

Also: if this is imported data, the source has to be clearly stated - "Bing" is most likely not correct.

    colour=18
    entity=2DPolyline
    layer=Bangunan
    linetype=Continuous
    linewt=25
Adamant1 (2018-06-20 00:47:07+00:00): Hi there. Wouldn't if an abbreviation is used or not depend on what is on the street sign?
user_5359 (2018-06-20 03:23:14+00:00): Hello! Please don’t use abbreviation for highway names. For details read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
Adamant1 (2018-06-20 04:19:29+00:00): Personally I don't. I was just pointing out there might be cases where they should be used since its what the street sign says. For instance the wiki says "If the name is incorrect when spelled in full, however, do not falsely expand it." and "you should always enter the full name as it appears on the street name signs." So it doesn't seem like a hard and fast rule. Although I can see where shortened words would cause problems with mapping software, if we expand names simply to serve the software instead of because its what the actual name is, its sort of akin to mapping for the render. At least in my opinion. Plus it could potentially cause problems for locals who are searching for a street name based on it being abbreviated and not expanded. Since that is what the sign says. Although I can see both perspectives. I will have to do more research on it.
freebeer (2018-06-20 06:36:02+00:00): Hallo Ad Aman T-1,
What may be printed on a physical sign will reflect a policy that transforms an official name into a shortened or abbreviated version for cost savings or brevity or modern spiffiness or whatever.
That is, these streets do not have the official and spoken name of Str or St., but if you find an official planning source where abbreviations are not used, or where common abbreviations are expanded in an appendix, assuming governments in this area work to the standards of thoroughness I expect rather than assuming the obvious, you will find the name in full.
If as you saw elsewhere, a sign-printer shop dispenses with Street or abbreviates it and you want to cater to that as well, there is a short_name or comparable tag that will allow just that.
By the way, I would prioritise the do-not-abbreviate rule over the on-the-ground rule when ordering guidelines for parsing, but that may be just me.
.
Is it just me also, or is Barn Dance Strada here a road island, with a poorly sited address node?  Logically it would seem it should connect with a not-yet-drawn continuation of Bonanza Doctor bridge to the southwest...
Adamant1 (2018-06-21 01:45:59+00:00): Hello Freebears,
Points taken. I would image what ever benefit there is, if there really are any, to keeping abbreviated names in cases where the local government has them in some cryptic document in a basement, probably isn't worth the time and effort it would take. I wasn't aware of the short_name though. I might use that in conjunction with the alt_name, local_name, historical_name, and because_I_feel_like_it_name tags in the future. 
My original grip was more with the use of an absolute by the original commentator  than anything else. When I first signed up many moons ago there was an discussion in the forum about if people's names could used in Afghanistan in absence of addresses so their houses could be found. Even though it violates the privacy rule. I don't think it was ever resolved, but it occasionally reminds me that there are always local variations which should be accounted for. Except for parks. They should be universally defined, but that's it. 
Also, wow, how did I miss that one? I'll have to give it a once over.
eggie (2018-06-18 18:33:59+00:00): Dit was mijn edit.. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59950006
mavl (2018-07-20 15:38:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:41:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:45:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:26:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:39:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:57:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:42:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:47:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:43:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:39:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:53:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:43:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:39:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:45:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:49:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:40:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:48:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:51:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:45:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:39:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:47:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:52:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:51:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:21:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 14:00:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:53:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:39:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:51:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:51:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:41:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:53:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:40:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:39:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:57:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:39:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:57:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].