piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
julcnx (2021-09-09 09:12:43+00:00): Hi vulasala. Main links between settlements should be marked as unclassified. Residential roads are only meant to be found within residential areas. Please kindly change this classification and refer to the official guidelines below. If you or your manager has any concerns please contact the community in the forum as described below in the wiki. Thank you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110946678
vulasala (2022-04-18 11:08:13+00:00): Hi cmoffroad,

Hope you are doing great. Thanks for reviewing the data. We have reverted the changes as per your suggestion. We will make sure to follow the update for the rest of the scenarios.

Thank you!"
NetWormKido (2021-09-09 05:42:35+00:00): Михаил, я откатил вашу правку, вы удалили лишнего и поломалось несколько отношений. Я исправил, посмотрите, всё ли нормально.
Mikhail Kruglov (2021-09-10 04:24:55+00:00): Проехался по трассе, сейчас пока ещё остались левые повороты с Новосибирска на Томск и с Томска на Кемерово, но видимо их закроют со дня на день, ибо ради исключения пересечений встречных полос с левыми поворотами и построена эта развязка.
NetWormKido (2021-09-10 04:35:30+00:00): Спасибо за уточнение. Я тогда убрал лишние повороты.
ovruni (2021-09-09 04:57:07+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se menciona "Modificaciones geométricas", sin embargo se han modificado varia vías en las cuales se han retirado prefijos de Jirón, Pasaje, por los que he restaurado las calles con nombres.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
Jo Cassel (2022-02-02 13:16:23+00:00): Hallo, dachte dass ich an diesem NSG auch schonmal dran war, ist aber in der Versionsgeschichte nicht (mehr) zu finden

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/976616276/history

warum war denn hier überhaupt eine Änderung nötig?
pd8JUHyoPJ (2022-02-03 06:33:57+00:00): Hallo,
wenn ich mich recht erinnere: bei der Überarbeitung der Wege entprechend des Lufbildes hab' ich die NSG-Grenze an ein paar Stellen entsprechend angepasst.
VG Rolf
Jo Cassel (2022-02-03 11:06:53+00:00): Anpassungen der Schutzgebiets-Grenzen sollten eigentlich nur mit neuen amtlichen Daten (shape-Dateien) erfolgen, ansonsten sollte man die bei allen Bearbeitungen im Umfeld einfach in Ruhe lassen.
Was ich jetzt sehe, Du hast das ursprüngliche, 5 Jahre alte Schutzgebiet, den way 430617663, vor 5 Monaten gelöscht

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/430617663/history

und mit der neuen OSM-id 976616276 neu angelegt?
Sriosm (2021-09-09 05:25:54+00:00): Used Mapillary images also as source
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110948665
adiatmad (2024-03-20 09:01:14+00:00): Hello Md Emon Rahman, I'm curious about the meaning of the 'building=' tag along with 'layer='. I checked the Wiki page, but I couldn't find any suggested combinations for both tags. Any insights? Thanks!

(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building)
(https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1IQS)
GOwin (2021-09-10 01:21:03+00:00): It's probably better to use a direct URL to an image of your hotel for the "image" tag. 

That way, third-party apps who consume OSM data will display a nice photo of your hotel instead.
eggie (2021-09-09 08:11:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Alle begin is moeilijk. Er was al een adresnode. Die heb je verplaatst naar een akker.
Toen heb je het adres toegevoegd aan de gebouwomtrek, maar dat is helaas niet correct.
VBerder heb je in de volgende changeset de BAG info verwijderd die nodig is bij periodieke updates.
source=BAG
Je edits 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110954124

MVG, 


Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-09 08:13:40+00:00): source=BAG en adres weer hersteld.
Mapse
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-09-09 07:19:23+00:00): Beste CdBe

In osm Nederland is het de gewoonte om bedrijven uitsluitend op de adresnodes bij te taggen.
Dat geeft een symbool en bij de juiste tagging is ook de naam zichtbaar.
Alleen wanneer het echt de gebouwnaam is gebruiken we de gebouwomtrek.
Kijk je nog even?
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2021-09-09 07:43:18+00:00): Best lastig al die regeltjes en afspraken in het begin..
Mapse
Eggie
eggie (2021-09-09 08:03:52+00:00): De bedrijfs- en adresgegevens heb ik weer verwijderd van de 'buildingshape'.  De OSM format van de openingstijden heb ik aangepast. th ipv thu  en ; ipv ,
Je zou in het vervolg deze tool kunnen gebruiken.
Het resultaat plak je dan in de value. 
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/?oh=Mo-Th%2008:00-17:00;%20Fr%2008:00-15:00

Geef het even de tijd om te renderen.. Dan zul je zien dat het zichtbaar wordt.
MVG
eggie

ps Hier nog wat leesvoer hoe bedrijven te tagen..
Eigen bedrijf toevoegen 

https://www.onosm.org/ 

en 

 

https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/11/46.87897/8.23975 

 

En video 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6edDUi1o9RA
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:04:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
skquinn (2022-01-24 02:44:04+00:00): Are your proprietary sources more recent than the latest Bing imagery, which appears to show three lanes here, not four?
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2022-01-24 09:26:20+00:00): Hi, Skquinn

My name is Yuliya and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for your question.
To make edits we use proprietary features created by Lyft, specifically the street-level imagery from Lyft’s drivers taken during rides at various locations. This data is updated frequently and we try to make edits based on the most recent data. 

Lanes count was fixed according to the street-level imagery taken 2021-09-08 from the point with coordinates 29°36′2″N, 95°37′42″W.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ye3SFK6m9xmMtgUhGSTufmDOKROfP4ql/view?usp=sharing
As for now, there is street-level imagery from 2022-01-08.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/15u7EROvWwAV3UCD9yeUiuFGCUkfRN-OE/view?usp=sharing

So the Lyft imagery looks more recent than the latest Bing imagery and the segment has 4 lanes according to the most up-to-date evidence available to us.

Thank you for your contribution,
Yuliya
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-09-09 08:07:56+00:00): Oke Sander, maar auto's en motoren zijn al per default = no en hoef je niet toe te voegen.
Alleen de uitzonderingen kun je dan toevoegen zoals moped en mofa en evt. horse. 
Je had dus alleen de regel motorfiets kunnen verwijderen.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-09-16 15:22:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Most buildings are rectangular. Please square them with the Q key
Don't overlap buildings
Map buildings individual. don't cluster buildings


FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110958037
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Glassman (2021-09-11 15:41:50+00:00): #TIP: Add a bridge to the section of the footway that crosses over the water. Tag the section as bridge=yes + layer=1. The bridge can be seen in the Maxar Premium imager. (Background icon on the right hand side of the editor) 

Can you add the bridge in? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110958409
JulieOT (2021-09-09 08:38:37+00:00): parfait pour toutes ces modifications merci :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-11-28 11:17:55+00:00): Har du checket om Kayerødsgade faktisk er ensrettet. Eller om der bare er indkørsel forbudt fra den vestlige side?

På SDFE kan man se biler, der vender den anden vej.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
ToniE (2021-09-09 08:18:52+00:00): Hydrant, ... entlang Sommerstraße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
pitscheplatsch (2021-09-10 14:43:40+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111009511
SomeoneElse (2021-09-12 13:40:41+00:00): Hello maimai1130w and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please don't add test data here - if you'd like to do that please use the test server - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing for more details.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2021-09-12 13:41:13+00:00): 您好 maimai1130w，欢迎来到 OpenStreetMap！

请不要在此处添加测试数据 - 如果您想这样做，请使用测试服务器 - 有关更多详细信息，请参阅 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing。

此致，

Andy Townsend，代表 OSM 的数据工作组。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-22 15:55:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111550434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5343 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-09-09 08:50:00+00:00): 您好，想问一下您是如何监视到这个变化的，我们于今天也发现了这个问题，但还没来得及写Ticket的邮件给DWG，也仅仅在小范围内进行过讨论
无论如何，非常感谢您的快速响应👍
user_2008655 (2021-11-01 06:27:40+00:00): 我也很好奇如何加入DWG
eggie (2021-09-10 11:12:27+00:00): Oke, maar moet er dan ook niet access=destination op?
Of kan de routing app van HVC omgaan met rising?

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
archpdx (2021-09-10 02:01:18+00:00): Thanks for cleaning this up! It makes more sense for these to be fast food nodes than restaurant buildings and it definitely renders better too. I'll use this and as an example for future cart pods I might come across.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Nielkrokodil (2021-09-12 20:18:03+00:00): Hi Tavi Alexandre,

It is not the building name, but the company name you added here. Please also provide at least a company-tag to avoid confusion. 

As far as I know, the company area (Plasser & Theurer) is more than just the building, it is also the rails and some other buildings. So it would be best to remove the name from the building and create a new Plasser & Theurer area object. 

If you dont have enough local knowledge, let me know. I could help.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
kawino85 (2021-11-17 22:42:17+00:00): This looks very destructive to me: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110963204
Filip009 (2022-01-10 21:46:02+00:00): Dobrý deň, skúste prosím do budúcnosti pri úpravách landuse používať multipolygóny. Pri ďalších úpravách sa s nimi pracuje oveľa lepšie ako s veľa čiarami cez seba. Pokiaľ neviete ako na to, rád Vám s tým poradím.
PizzaCutter (2022-01-11 08:41:50+00:00): Ktoré objekty konkrétne myslíte?
Filip009 (2022-01-11 09:24:28+00:00): Táto čiara [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100248047] je v celej dĺžke na nejakej inej. Pre toto je najlepšie použiť multipolygón a nastaviť jednotlivým čiaram role. Keď si to stiahnete v JOSM, tak po celej dĺžke vidno, ako sú body väčšie.
Napríklad keď si stiahnete túto oblasť [https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13441350], tak tam je všade len jedna čiara.
Napríklad tu [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981178288] je chyba , pretože tam kde sa seba dotýkajú tam by nemali byť členmi relácie quarry, čiže by ich bolo treba rozdeliť a spraviť z nich multipolygóny. A jednotlivým čiaram priradiť role.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.