piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2021-10-27 09:01:09+00:00): Hi,

it is great that you have a look at data quality in OSM. However, your edits do not support the project.

By just trying to get your quality assurance (QA) analysis green, you edit features which were corrupted by low quality edits or vandalism. In such cases, a "repair" as suggested by a QA tool might fix the problem on the surface, but the garbage in the database is just covered by a thin blanket. This does not help OSM. Instead, it harms it. Mistakes and scrap in OSM get hidden under a layer of pseudo-valid data and are difficult to discover. Reverting vandalism and low quality edits gets difficult because your "contributions" cause conflicts during the revert. Volunteers spent ("waste" is the more precise term) more time on reverts and you harm the project in the long run.

The German OSM community expects anyone who gets paid for editing OSM and who edits as a substantial part of their daily job to deliver high-quality (not just average) contributions. This means, that you have to work as diligent, accurate and careful as experienced mappers do. This does not only mean that the Good Practice documented on the wiki page is your job description. It also means that you have to investigate any data issues you encounter. Only, if there are no signs of vandalism, low quality (newbie) edits, undiscussed, undocumented or low quality imports, undiscussed, undocumented or low quality mechanical or organised edits, a repair is appropriate. In any other case, a further investigation is required. If you cannot do that, you have to (a) inform the local community about your findings (not DWG, they exist for cases where moderator rights are necessary) and (b) should not edit the area.

Please inform your supervisors about this message.

Best regards

Michael
DianaDemchuk (2021-10-27 10:03:28+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your feedback, we passed the information to our supervisors.
Best regards
user_5359 (2022-02-20 07:38:05+00:00): Hello! What is your interpretation of the key altitude? Did you mean the key ele (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele)?

Bonjour ! Quelle est la signification du key altitude ? Voulez-vous dire la clé ele (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/R
FR:Key:ele) ?
dieterdreist (2024-11-20 09:04:49+00:00): Hi, I also noticed the altitude tags. What is the unit, is it meters? Are these things levitating above the ground or did you intend to map the elevation of the ground where they stand on? 
If these are thought to be meters, e.g. 818.9404396, the indicated precision is between micrometers and nanometers, very small stuff that is, I would encourage you to reflect about measurement accuracy as well as the reference height (e.g. if there is a grain of sand below your measuring device it will already change the number, unevenness of the ground etc.), and eventually round these numbers.
Sto-Sto (2022-01-18 17:52:10+00:00): no nie, przecież to nie są ULICE piesze, te wszystkie bramy i dojścia do nich
user_11609320 (2021-10-26 08:34:39+00:00): source is from https://www.estransit.com/routes-schedule/395-routes/lone-pine-express/
BCNorwich (2021-10-26 13:23:51+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I take it your edit was inadvertent so I've restored the position of the solar panels, they can be clearly be seen on imagery. 

Need any help please just ask here.
Regards Bernard.
eggie (2021-10-26 09:16:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
simo_explorer (2024-02-01 09:27:57+00:00): buongiorno, in merito a questa area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996573588

penso sia da aliminare perchè si tratta di una zona erbosa (in pendenza) di un terreno di ulivi, il tag landuse=brownfield è a mio avviso errato.
Grazie
BCNorwich (2021-10-29 08:40:29+00:00): You are still making lots of duplicate highways.
joost schouppe (2021-10-26 08:59:41+00:00): Looks good to me! Note that your promotional text is not actually in the database - which is a good thing, because we expect something a bit more neutral in OpenStreetMap. You could add a "description" using the editor, but do keep it neutral in that case.
pio2_122 (2021-10-26 10:55:32+00:00): Do oznaczenia numerów dróg powiatowych (które nie są oznakowane w terenie) należy używać tagu  unsigned_ref, a nie ref. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Oznakowanie_dr.C3.B3g
JLZIMMERMANN (2021-10-27 20:42:33+00:00): bonjour Joseph,
Si tu rajoute Natural scrub à la multi-relation et le plan d'eau et la prairie vont être concernés.
cehceh (2021-10-28 16:40:22+00:00): Hallo tacosloveur,
thank you for updating Via Ferrata Roche Veyrand!
The new depart of second piece I added now to the existent ferrata relation (This is important because of rendering on other sites like xctrails.org). 
For the closed piece with Passerelle du Pas de la Frousse I added the "access=no" tag. 
Greetings, Matthias
eggie (2021-10-26 09:19:17+00:00): Dag Marcel.. Goed om de kaart actueel te maken.
Gebouwen tekenen we echter niet zelf in, maar worden periodiek geïmporteerd. Dit kun je versnellen middels een verzoek op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Inlog identiek aan OSM account
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-26 09:36:27+00:00): De school staat nog op Bouwvergunning verleend. Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen naar het Kadaster met het verzoek hun administratie bij te werken.
Importeren kan nog niet. Ik heb het even zo aangepast mbv de Kadasterdata.
De school staat nu op adresnode 39 conform de website.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-26 09:42:27+00:00): Hier kun je een terugmelding doen
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=molenstraat%2039%20sw&resultOffset=0&objectId=1507202000510759&geometry.x=204941.789&geometry.y=389448.24&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=1507013000003598
gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-26 09:44:40+00:00): Tip: sport=beachvolleyball zal wel kloppen, maar niet nogmaal name=Beachvolley toevoegen... of de club moet zo heten?
eggie (2021-10-26 09:49:37+00:00): Nog een tip.. Geen adressen en clubinfo toevoegen aan gebouwen. 
Gebruik alleen de adresnode. 
eggie
SekeRob (2021-10-26 11:20:56+00:00): Hi,

Changed the actual name as per your comment from S.Maria to Santa Maria. OSM likes not using abbreviations.ù

cheers

PS Pure coincidence I saw this... I'm mapping all the area landcover on the Majella momentarily.
eggie (2021-10-26 09:21:00+00:00): Let op... Als je zomaar gaat schuiven met de nodes (knopen)  dan komt alles mee met soms ongewenste effecten.
Zie hier je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112983648

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-26 09:50:25+00:00): Landuse hersteld.. alle begin is moeilijk.
Marcel Hovens (2021-10-26 12:59:53+00:00): Super, bedankt voor de tips en het geduld bij een beginner ;-)
eggie (2021-10-26 13:05:43+00:00): Laat je niet weerhouden door kritiek. Iedereen was ooit beginner.
Mapse
Eggie
silversurfer83 (2023-05-28 15:43:50+00:00): Hi
und was ist das?
Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112984024
der TJ (2023-09-12 08:39:50+00:00): Eigentlich sollte das Layer -1 sein und damit unsichtbar.
und der Knoten heisst so wie das was er ist: eine XBS Antenne von dem Standort.
silversurfer83 (2023-09-12 15:35:02+00:00): Auch interessant.
Ich finde jedoch auf die schnelle online keine Erklärungen, was eine XBS Antenne sein soll.
Grundsätzlich hat das Wiki jedoch auch etwas zum Thema Antennen zu sagen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dantenna
Vielleicht kannst du den node entsprechend anpassen, damit er etwas aussagekräftiger wird.
Ob jetzt die ganze ref in das Feld "name=" gehört, weiß ich noch nicht. Dafür müsste ich mehr über die Antenne wissen.
Tilia_J (2022-02-02 18:57:42+00:00): Zijn "Trapveld Groenling / Balverszaal" en "Volleybal Groenling / Balverszaal" beschrijvingen of staan er werkelijk naambordjes met bovenstaande teksten bij?

Indien beschrijvingen dan graag "description" gebruiken ipv "name"
Tilia_J (2022-02-02 18:59:22+00:00): Dit gaat ook op voor de overige zaken die ik in Ermelo zie, met name speelterreinen.
ualios (2021-10-28 08:40:10+00:00): Ciao, vedo che hai moltiplicato la relazione 278661 (percorso escursionistico tratturo Lucera - Castel di Sangro) aggiungendo quelle identiche relative a percorsi a cavallo (13371479) e mtb (13371480), informazioni già contenute nella relazione originaria. E' una procedura discussa e condivisa? A me pare una soluzione inutilmente ridondante che aumenta oltretutto il lavoro di mappatura in caso di modifiche del tracciato. A questo proposito segnalo che il percorso https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972537804 non è utilizzabile in quanto l'attraversamento stradale è assolutamente vietato.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
surveyor54 (2021-10-26 14:33:10+00:00): Hi Mond00,
ist crossing=unmarked hier richtig?
Ist doch ein Zebrastereifen.
Gruß
surveyor54
Mond00 (2021-10-26 15:52:05+00:00): Korrigiert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2021-10-26 10:45:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
skarabej (2021-11-05 15:45:53+00:00): Changing Place de Jaude to pedestrian will make the parking area non-routable because ways 934373322 and 27625939 will become disconnected.
Could you find a way to connect those two ways?
ChillyDL (2021-10-30 20:20:01+00:00): Hallo Ritschiratschi, du gibst an, das Großsteingrab "Sieben Brüder" auf Bing identifiziert zu haben. Wie hast du denn das hingekriegt? Ich seh da nur Bäume. Andere geben den Standort auch an einer leicht anderen Stelle an:
https://tw.strahlen.org/praehistorie/mvp/tribberatz.html
Ritschiratschi (2021-10-31 08:54:39+00:00): Hallo ChillyDLesby, bei einer Wanderung bin ich an dem Großsteingrab vorbei gekommen. Dort habe ich es mit der App "Go Map!! 3.1.0" mit dem GPS Signal meines Handy eingetragen. Zudem habe ich mich an den Wegen orientiert.(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Go_Map!!) (in der App ist Bing Maps als Hintergrund eingestellt)
ChillyDL (2021-10-31 09:23:44+00:00): Ah, ich verstehe, danke. Schau mal, bei genauerem Hingucken habe ich das Grab sogar tatsächlich auf Bing gefunden, an der Stelle, die bei tw.strahlen.org angegeben ist. Der Waldweg nach Osten war gegenüber Bing und Esri zu weit nördlich eingezeichnet. Jetzt müsste es stimmen, oder?
Gino-52 (2021-10-30 11:36:58+00:00): Hallo Wipflord, schön, dass Du Dich bei OSM so rege beteiligst.
M.M. nach sollte bei jeder Straße, Service oder Path neben der Oberfläche auch angegeben werden, ob Licht ja oder nein. Ich versuche das überall nach zutragen. Speziell bei den Einfahrten, die von Amazon gemappt werden. Vielleicht kannst Du das ja bei Deinem Tagging in Zukunft gleich mit erfassen oder vielleicht auch nachtragen.
Weiterhin viel Freude bei der Arbeit mit OSM.
Gruß Norbert
Ach, bei dem Änderungssatz, den ich völlig zufällig ausgewählt habe, ist foot=yes überflüssig weil es bei highway=path ein Defaultwert ist.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
mcliquid (2022-04-08 15:00:47+00:00): Hallo filzstift, ich habe getreu deinem Profil die turn-restriction auf der Winterbergstrasse korrigiert. Diese war auf "Nur links abbiegen" gestellt, obwohl dort eine durchgezogene Linie auf der Straße ist. Viele Grüße
Siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13371623/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
DeKaN (2021-10-26 13:19:33+00:00): Было более точное значение для тега `building`, зачем ухудшать?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Sheila Job (2021-10-29 07:31:55+00:00): well mapped, but has some problems such as a drawing made on two buildings, small drawings in relation to buildings. please see in the  link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&#map=20/48.16361/18.58223 

The rest was well mapped, thank you please continue
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112987390
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
ivanbranco (2021-12-01 09:41:47+00:00): Hi Ramon,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2461677269/history

I don't understand why to use the :2020 tagging when the values are the same as the tag without :2020
Ramon Noguer Feixas (2021-12-01 10:23:09+00:00): The bank and the ATM are closed since 2020. I wanted to keep the history... 
How should I tag?
Thx.
ivanbranco (2021-12-01 10:27:53+00:00): If it was me, I would have used a disused prefix.

So:
disused:amenity=atm
name=Banco Santander (only if the name is still visible)

I see that the bank was fixed already with disused:shop=yes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2461677268/history)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
ivanbranco (2021-10-27 15:20:42+00:00): Hi Sawner,

what's the meaning of Film=Il Cadone?
Also please add useful changeset comments, here some tips: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
mueschel (2021-10-26 10:57:58+00:00): Hi,
this import created ways with foreign tags like these:
error:circular
source:datetime

Could you check and fix this?
LVM_import (2021-10-26 11:29:17+00:00): Sorry, forgot to remove this again. Will do.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
itineris (2021-10-26 11:57:17+00:00): Szia!

Tök jó, hogy keresztbe szerkesztettünk. Én mondjuk a hibás "name" címkézést is módosítottam (volna) "ref"-re, beraktam volna a sávok számába 2-t, és javítottam volna még egyéb csúnyaságokat.

Az iD editor meg kivágta az órányi munkám.

Üdv:
Ákos
Bálint (2021-10-26 20:56:51+00:00): Szia!

A rendszer nem jelzi, hogy más is dolgozik éppen az adott területen. Inkább kétszer szerkesszünk, mint egyszer se. :) Direkt mentegettem pár percenként, tudom milyen kellemetlen, ha egy órányi munka megy kárba.

Üdv,
Bálint
nk63 (2021-10-28 19:37:46+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz ist falsch. Bitte gelöschte Halle wiederherstellen und die abgerissenen Garagen löschen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
nagy_balint (2021-10-26 11:52:45+00:00): Szia!

warnings:impossible_oneway:highway	6

Lemaradtak a oneway=yes tagok.

Üdv:
nagy_balint
itineris (2021-10-26 20:40:56+00:00): Szia!

Pár darabot sikerült fordítva rajzolnod (vagy úgy hagynod). Kérlek, legközelebb jobban figyelj oda!

Üdv:
Ákos
Emilius123 (2021-10-28 01:12:02+00:00): Sehr geehrter Herrn Friendly_Ghost,

Digga was das? Fühlst dich auf einmal mit Massenedit in der Bundesrepublik? Vallah, gönn dir.
SafetyIng (2021-11-01 11:19:01+00:00): Hey Friendly_Ghost
I agree with Emilius in context, but not in language.
You did a major machine edit here. Was there an agreement on this somewhere? 
Please note in future: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Automated_edits
Emilius123 (2021-11-01 15:53:36+00:00): Just a note, @SafetyIng,

As far as the author has commented on this in the OSM World Discord server, this is a manual edit.
SafetyIng (2021-11-01 16:23:36+00:00): @Emilius123 - sorry, no. See at the wiki: 
"Search and replace function in JOSM can be used to select and change tags that meet certain characteristics on large areas. These are considered to be automated edits where individual changes are not reviewed on an individual basis."

Throug the size of the edit, it is (semi) automated. 
Also is the Discord not a official stream of OSM and there were no discussion on any central OSM-official Way (forum, mailinglist) or a local other channel.... See at the code of conduct.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-11-02 10:32:27+00:00): Hi guys. I took my time to look at all playgrounds with unusual tags to not miss any corner cases or other things that would require a closer look. 

Look for example at the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770898831/history and the discussion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81341526

Only playgrounds that were tagged with just leisure=playground + name=Spielplatz and other simple tags like access and surface were changed automatically.
EinKonstanzer (2021-11-07 10:49:53+00:00): This is no justification!
Guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:18:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
Diacritic (2021-10-26 11:35:23+00:00): Hey,

Just in regards to 112989176, there isn’t any physical separation between the turn lane and the main carriageway. Would you be able to adjust the turn off up to where the turn splits off?
Diacritic (2021-10-26 11:41:56+00:00): I also just noticed that a lot of the drive thrus and service lanes near the Monahans Rd intersection are layer=-1, which would imply that they are underground. The building/roofs above them should instead be layer=1 and the roads at ground level
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
t_ja (2021-10-27 19:18:19+00:00): Ahoj,
pokiaľ je to možné, treba upravovať existujúce budovy. Mazať starú budovy a vytvoriť na jej mieste novú jedine vtedy, pokiaľ by úprava bola zložitá, čo ale nie je prípad v tomto tvojom changesete. Tvojím postupom si zmazal asi 10 adries z OSM (napríklad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321373814/history), čím si zahodil prácu niekoho iného a zhoršil stav v OSM.

Prosím buď viac opatrný a ak nevieš, čo ktorý tag znamená, vyhľadaj si ho na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/.

T.
Patr1k_P (2021-10-28 08:28:19+00:00): Navyše, pokiaľ by aj bola úprava zložitá, tak sa dá ľahko preniesť história zo starej na novú.. Čiže nemusí sa priamo upravovať existujúca, môže sa vytvoriť nová a len prenesies históriu zo starej cez plugin "UtilsPlugin2" .... Oznacis novú a starú budovu a dáš Ctrl+Shift+G.... Pri kreslení budov by si mal aj uvádzať zdroj.. Si všimni aj tie co si mazal, tiež bol uvedený zdroj..
Patr1k_P (2021-10-28 08:36:51+00:00): nemusí sa priamo upravovať existujúca, ani mazať, vždy sa dá preniesť história..
t_ja (2021-10-28 08:42:52+00:00): Tiež používam UtilsPlugin2 v JOSM, ale tento changeset bol vytvorený editorom iD, preto som sa nenamáhal spísať to :)
Patr1k_P (2021-10-28 08:46:09+00:00): Aha, sorry to som si nevšimol, cez mobil mam trochu obmedzené možnosti:)
user_2066394 (2021-10-29 21:02:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dfuneral_directors
bayosm (2021-10-26 18:21:33+00:00): В тег name пишем только названия (официальные имена собственные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Не должно быть таких описательных названий как "лавочки". Пожалуйста удалите такие названия.