piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 14:32:17+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM. When naming try to capitalize proper names.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92071348
StephaneP (2021-06-30 06:27:03+00:00): Bonjour Kalepom,

Pourquoi avoir ajouté des relation boundary=administrative + admin_level=11 sur des Zones d'activités ? De la même façon, des nodes tels que https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7983035062 avec le role admin_centre n'ont pas vraiment de sens.
Tu t'es appuyé sur quelque chose en particulier pour faire ces choix ?

A+

Stf
StephaneP (2021-06-30 06:31:33+00:00): De la même façon, du suburb pour des quartiers minuscules tels que https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7961223792, c'est assez exagéré. Je ne sais même pas si ça mérite du https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood

On avait discuté de tout ça il y a longtemps sur la liste nantaise. Il faudrait peut-être qu'on se repenche sur le sujet et apporter des modifications.

A+
Kalepom (2021-06-30 13:18:52+00:00): Salut Stéphane, 
J'ai repris les découpages et les noms des IRIS de l'INSEE. Sur le wiki ça semblait être pratiqué comme ça dans d'autres villes en France.
StephaneP (2021-08-22 17:01:58+00:00): Hello Lucas,
Désolé pour la réponse tardive.
Si les frontières ne me posent pas de problème, en revanche les nodes place=suburb ne sont pas justifiés. J'en ai déjà supprimé une partie : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110070654
Je pense qu'il y a encore du nettoyage à faire, mais ça mérite une discussion plus globale.

Stf
Kalepom (2021-08-22 17:17:27+00:00): Ok. Il me semblait qu'une surface admin_level devait toujours avec un admin_center. Mais si n'est pas/plus le cas, tant mieux.
StephaneP (2021-08-22 17:24:28+00:00): Bah un admin_centre pour une zone industrielle, c'est un peu bizarre :-) Et oui, c'est optionnel : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members

Et franchement, de l'admin_level pour du découpage IRIS, je trouve ça moyen. Ca reste un simple découpage utilisé à des fins de statistiques : https://www.insee.fr/fr/metadonnees/definition/c1523
osmviborg (2020-10-07 05:44:15+00:00): Hej. Undlad venligst at tilføje adresse oplysninger på polygoner (bygninger/områder).
aceman444 (2020-10-06 22:59:43+00:00): Why such sharp angle? You touched that node 2 times already, while no touching was needed. What's your point?
jurajik82 (2020-10-09 21:02:15+00:00): The point is OsmAnd didn't tell user to turn right if route goes right. OsmAnd was quiet here completely for both through and slight_right direction. With this change it speaks. I've read also source code of OsmAnd and the condition to be quiet is there if angle of turn is less than 45 degrees or segment is shorten than 5 meters. I'm not happy with this change too as it doesn't correspond to reality and for OsmAnd it should be enough to have turn:lanes to navigate correctly regardless of angles and points of following segments. However I'm not so confdent to fix OsmAnd as all its features are requested by someone. What's your sugesstion here?
aceman444 (2020-10-25 23:59:40+00:00): Well, in reality it is no right turn, you juct go straight. It is forbidden in OSM to change data to achieve some result in a particular application. If you think it should speak a command, this needs to be fixed in OsmAnd source. There are many places in OSM that have this junction geometry and you can't fix them all, and shouldn't. I do you OsmAnd routing extensively too, and yes it does not speak turns sometimes so you have to stare at the screen often. But you must not make OSM data wrong just to make OsmAnd happy.
jurajik82 (2020-10-27 00:22:00+00:00): OK.
Glassman (2020-10-07 19:29:57+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92072887
bxl-forever (2020-10-07 20:10:49+00:00): Hello,
We had to revert your change.
Contrary to cities, translations for places or streets do not go to the main "name" tag.  We only use alt_name for informal translations.
Next time, if you are unsure, please create a note or ask the local community first, especially when dealing with large objects on your first contributions.
Thanks and happy mapping. :-)
Glassman (2020-10-07 19:29:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92072968
Richū (2020-10-07 09:30:11+00:00): Dear Olyon,
why have you deleted the switchgears?
Olyon (2020-10-07 16:31:34+00:00): Hello,
It was tagged with power=plant and it is not power plant. And for me it is just part of a substation, I don't understand what it is the switchgear in a substation.
Glassman (2020-10-07 20:05:41+00:00): Tip: it looks like you accidentally deleted the highway type on 87th ave. It has been fixed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92073613
Glassman (2020-10-07 20:06:02+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92073714
Glassman (2020-10-07 20:07:41+00:00): It looks like you have a parking lot inside of another parking lot. It might be best to remove the large one and then add in the smaller one. Can you fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92073745
seattlefyi (2020-10-07 04:27:24+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Thanks for the edit, it's really considerate of you to add this. It does not appear that the tagging for this has been standardized yet. I added some tags which from experience fits more with OSM tagging styles. Thanks again!
Glassman (2020-10-07 19:42:17+00:00): Looking at the aerial imagery I don't see any indication of any housing. Can you verify?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92073847
Glassman (2020-10-07 20:08:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92073859
RiverBearings (2021-09-29 21:12:59+00:00): Hello utami_setyorini. I was looking at this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533768511) and noticed that there is a default oneway=yes tag and a conditional time tag with yes as well. Are the times outside the range specified in the conditional tag a oneway=no or is there a reversed direction oneway during that period of time? All available ground imagery in kartaview makes it seem that it is always a oneway in the set direction. Any help understanding the directions and times here would be greatly appreciated.
GrabID_Utami Gendis (2021-09-30 10:11:41+00:00): Hello RiverBearings. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. I am verifying it and I will get back with an update as soon as possible. Once again thank you very much
GrabID_Utami Gendis (2021-09-30 23:50:50+00:00): I have remove the oneway=yes tag since the road have a posted sign for conditional oneway, apologize for the confusedness
I add this conditional oneway on 2020 based on ground verification, and there is karta view image at -6.979341, 108.486620 to verify as well, but apparently it was blurry, if you have another source to verify it which is more updated, kindly please let me know and will fix it if the tag was incorrect, thank you and really appreciate for your concern
RiverBearings (2021-10-01 21:45:59+00:00): Utami_setyorini. Thanks for verifying and updating the tagging. The conditional oneway looks good to me! Have a great day.
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-07 01:28:23+00:00): Hi there!
This must be relatively new? Because I can't see it on any of the latest imagery.
Is this place no longer called Gwydir Park?
flynnymeboy (2020-10-07 01:45:20+00:00): Hey! It is a fairly new addition, there doesn’t seem to be any physical signage, but it seems as if there’s almost a subdivision of park if that makes sense? The new park shows up on google maps so i thought I may as well add it here. :)
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-07 01:52:34+00:00): Makes sense!
Sounds like you've scouted this one out in person. To help clue you in, when submitting a changeset you can (and should) include "Sources". This would only be the one source of "surveyed".

Have to be careful to only use sources we're allowed to. Anything in iD (the editor you used) is safe (e.g. the imagery, the NSW LPI Base Map, Mapillary, or OpenStreetCam). Can't use things like Google, for example.
Not that I'm saying you did, just letting you know because you're new. :)
So welcome!
flynnymeboy (2020-10-07 02:13:08+00:00): Thanks so much! I’ll make sure to include sources next time thanks for letting me know :)
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-07 02:21:04+00:00): Correction: source would be "survey". iD suggests the correct one. If using aerial imagery, can also name which one you used. e.g. "aerial imagery" and "NSW LPI Imagery"
Leo Slager (2020-10-07 23:39:53+00:00): Je zult toch wat nauwkeuriger te werk moeten gaan.
Nu maak je alleen maar meer schade.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=6.43298&lat=51.87869&zoom=17&opacity=0.77
AnonymousAlligator (2020-10-07 02:42:52+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed one small issue with your edit--the parking garage is tagged as a "Garage", but "Multilevel Parking Garage" is more suitable. Other than that, everything looks good!

Just to let you know, we have a Slack channel at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/. It's a great place to ask questions or chat with other mappers, both new and experienced. Thanks for your contributions!
nevw (2020-10-09 06:12:35+00:00): Hi Grahame80
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.04926&lat=-27.25962&zoom=16
If you want to group all these things together in a relation the role should be outer.
Josm is best for doing relations.
GrahR (2020-10-09 21:04:02+00:00): Hi nevw
Thanks for the correction. I'm startinf tpo get my head arund layers!
Regards Grahame80
Kovoschiz (2020-10-07 09:42:09+00:00): 1. Are you sure? The turn from Sai Yeung Choi St S to Argyle St is almost 90 degrees. It may be considered a right turn across the junction, which the solid white line doesn't ban. There's no obvious conflict at the junction. I would assume this is to control lane change along Argyle St, where left turning vehicles must get in lane before the junction.
2. This won't be the best solution, with the absence of any physical separation. The turning restriction would be established `from` Sai Yeung Choi St S `via` Argle St `to` Nathan Rd. `turn:lanes=` and `change:lanes=` would used. More complicated, yes.
Kovoschiz (2020-10-08 14:19:52+00:00): 1. Ok I made it work
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2020-10-07 10:01:09+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OpenStreetMap ☺
I suggest that you checkout this page on how to write good changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments “:)” is not really informative about what have been done.
Also, consider splitting such changesets, but sending in separate changesets the changes made in Russia and in North America. Otherwise, everyone in Europe is being notified by your changes for no reasons. Thanks in advance!
danieldegroot2 (2020-10-09 11:04:06+00:00): And don't forget to square your building corners!
You can do so with the Q button on your keyboard. See the bottom left of the iD editor for all the shortcuts.
aharvey (2020-10-08 04:28:35+00:00): looks good. There is a clear "Private Road" sign showing for Sea Street so all good. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.83224722222223&lng=151.150425&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=kX6AM3TbnIBbucyHzmHizA&x=0.4532493606392&y=0.5196650251542435&zoom=0.8103975535168195
Mel P C (2020-10-08 05:29:10+00:00): Thanks.  I thought I should get a review, as these were my first ever edits!
mueschel (2020-10-12 08:34:25+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the key "maxspeed:relative = yes"? This seems a bit strange.

Thanks!
Minh Nguyen (2020-10-14 07:00:54+00:00): It’s quite strange, but true: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Minh%20Nguyen/diary/394347
Minh Nguyen (2020-10-14 07:02:02+00:00): The “yes” is because the street-level imagery was just clear enough to tell that it was a relative “Weight Limits Reduced” sign, but not clear enough to see the actual percentage that the weight limit was reduced by.
mueschel (2020-10-14 07:11:57+00:00): The relative maxweight is strange but fine. I asked about maxspeed:relative
Minh Nguyen (2020-10-14 07:16:49+00:00): Oh! That was a typo – thanks for catching it. Fixed in changeset 92454686.
Glassman (2020-10-07 19:46:35+00:00): the point seems redundant.  The area is mapped as a park. Is that correct? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92076740
Bert Araali (2021-03-04 04:37:52+00:00): Hello,
Many of the buildings you created have the tag road=yes on the way outline.  This is not good practice.. Can you delete the road=yes from the buildings please.
Bert Araali (2021-03-04 04:41:32+00:00): Sorry, just noticed it was done in a previous edit, sorry for the inconvenience.
user_5359 (2021-03-04 04:46:59+00:00): Did you ask Batuly abdallah for the reason?
Bert Araali (2021-03-04 05:09:34+00:00): Yes, just did and left a comment on the HOT OSM project page #9511. The number is quite large and doesn't seemed to be noticed, or not done in HOTOSM validation. We have seen numerous others in Tanzania, contributing to a large spike (from 700 to over 2200) the past half year in incorrect use of the road=* tag.
user_5359 (2021-03-04 05:23:26+00:00): In fact, it seems to be a local problem in Tanzania
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/14yd
Bert Araali (2021-03-04 05:29:13+00:00): Not only, we where afraid it was some import or organised editing but seems to be more widespread.  We found a major culprit with road_name in Taiwan but that is already getting resolved by reverts.
On road=* see this for global problem since 08-2020: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/14ye
user_5359 (2021-03-04 15:06:31+00:00): see also https://taginfo.osm.org/keys/road#chronology
and https://taginfo.osm.org/keys/road#map

Sometimes used as a description of the nearby street (I observe something similar with the street key).
Bert Araali (2021-03-04 16:55:31+00:00): Not sure I understand what you mean. That taginfo is for road=*.
When I look at street=* in https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/street#chronology I don't see something similar, actually I see a significant clean-up at the beginning of 2021.
seattlefyi (2020-10-09 02:27:02+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the edits. Mapping houses is helpful! One tip (which you may have figured out since this edit): once you draw and tag the building, please square the corners by either right-clicking on the outline and selecting the squaring tool (to make the corners 90 degrees if applicable) -- otherwise you can press the 'q' hotkey to do the same. Thanks again, hope to see more!
Glassman (2020-10-07 19:48:52+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92080231
mavl (2020-10-07 15:29:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Статус дороги и её состояние - разные вещи (часто связанные, но не всегда). Не нужно выражать одно через другое.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:surface  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:smoothness
eggie (2020-10-07 06:38:16+00:00): Dag Jan-Peter,
bicycle-yes en foot=yes hoef je niet toe te voegen aan fietspaden.
Het is default...
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92081122
MVG,
Eggie
seattlefyi (2020-10-07 17:59:27+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! This change looks good, thanks -- the only suggestion I'd make here is to "square" the building outline after drawing it using the iD squaring tool (select the outline, and right-click/select the squaring button (or instead use the 'q' hotkey.)) Once again, thanks, and hope to see more edits!
majkaz (2020-10-07 07:51:39+00:00): Ahoj, vítám u editování. Ale ta změna je blbě, amenity=picknick_table znamená stůl s lavicemi, lavička se tam už samostatně nepřidává.
owar (2020-10-07 07:59:38+00:00): OK, díky za upozornění. Teprve se do toho dostávám, tak se omlouvám :)
Miguel Pedr (2020-10-07 13:56:23+00:00): Hola
Las direcciones asignadas para la vía de servicio solo permiten que la persona ingrese al área de estacionamiento y la persona no puede salir, lo cual es un bucle sin fin dentro del área de estacionamiento.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92082630
PortPhillipBay (2020-10-07 20:00:16+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thank you for fixing this and letting me know!
PT-53 (2020-10-07 07:31:28+00:00): Hallo googie0815,
das Merkmal "Straßennummer" an dieser Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25628809/history
war wohl ein Versehen.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-10-11 06:39:04+00:00): Erledigt duch mueschel
Du hast ja leider nicht reagiert.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 14:08:07+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
grelus (2020-10-10 09:52:15+00:00): czy w tym miejscu istnieje droga rowerowa?
Jeżeli jest to planowany przebieg drogi rowerowej, należy użyć tagu: highway=proposed. W innym razie będzie to myliło użytkowników i wszystkie nawigacje.
osmviborg (2020-10-07 07:09:45+00:00): Hej. Jeg tror der er noget du har misforstået. Altananlæggene dækker over de tre anlæg: Fabers Anlæg, Gethers Anlæg og Vester Altan-anlægget. https://www.randers.dk/oplev/det-groenne-rum/altananlaeggene/
naveenpf (2020-10-09 07:43:40+00:00): Hello howtech, 
This is more apt for Kozhikode corportation 
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q28173697

Thanks,
naveenpf
howtech (2020-10-09 11:39:30+00:00): Agreed, thanks
Pol
naveenpf (2020-10-10 06:46:38+00:00): thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92087195
ToniE (2020-10-07 07:24:50+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM.

aternativ zu description schlage ich vor

- name=Woelcom EDV / IT

- office=it

zu setzten, dann wird's auch bei einer Suche gefunden und auf der Karte gezeigt.

Zusätzlich würde ich den Adresspunkt verdoppeln, so das die Hausnummer auch noch separat erscheint.

VG
Toni
Woelcom (2020-10-07 07:54:59+00:00): Danke für die Info.
eczajk1 (2020-12-05 18:23:34+00:00): This road does not exist anymore
naaitha (2020-12-07 04:48:44+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit and providing update about the area. I've made the necessary changes under changeset(#95391858). Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
naaitha
GerdP (2021-01-26 19:27:52+00:00): Hi!
You changed a few building=yes inside a farmyard to landuse=farmyard here. That makes no sense. What was really intended?
freeExec (2020-10-09 12:38:53+00:00): Разве гостиница занимает целиком всё здание?
NanMadol (2020-10-12 15:37:21+00:00): Hi freeExec, thank you for reaching out about this change. I took another look at Yandex Panorama and the whole building is not the hotel, I can see a few other businesses here. I’ve reverted this change to avoid any confusion here.
grouper (2020-11-03 03:31:41+00:00): Hello, thanks for contributing roads for this new subdivision in Florida. These roads should be classified as residential vs service, since the roads were built to serve houses which will soon be built here.
uthkarsh1 (2020-11-03 09:24:06+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing and modifying the edit. Will ensure to keep in mind to follow the instructions you've provided. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
uthkarsh1.
canfe (2020-10-19 06:58:35+00:00): Se la via è davvero Cristoforo, allora è bene aggiungerlo al cognome
Ragazzopazzo (2020-10-19 06:59:48+00:00): Libero di modificare
canfe (2020-10-20 05:53:41+00:00): Li ho aggiornati.
Ne mancano ancora un po' essendo zona nuova.
Se sei sicuro della toponomanstica potresti aggiungerli.
Ti segnalo questo sito che li mette in evidenza:

https://qa.poole.ch/
Ragazzopazzo (2020-10-21 09:07:28+00:00): mi piacciono questi siti di mappe. 
Io registro i miei traccaito con Europe 3d
canfe (2020-10-22 04:58:05+00:00): L'app di riferimento per OSM è OSMAND.
Ci fai moltissimo.
user_5359 (2020-10-12 03:30:28+00:00): Hello! Please use building instead of buildibg.
Hb- (2020-10-07 09:05:20+00:00): Please do not upload test data or training data to the OSM production database.
user_11435438 (2020-10-08 15:42:34+00:00): Hi, the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548046850 you changed, the node has been moved from the origin position about 1000km.
season3 (2020-10-08 22:05:55+00:00): Hey Jyunhou, thank you for letting me know! I've fixed the issue.
~nagisa (2020-12-24 16:36:28+00:00): Aurimai,

Vieną iš pievų (7002534) šiuo pakeitimu nustatei į natural=heath, tačiau dauguma augmenijos šiose pievose yra paprasčiausia „žolė“, ne augalai su sumedėjusiomis dalimis, ko pasak https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dheath reikėtų kad būtų taikytina `natural=heath` gairė. Šioje pievoje nebūna ir vaisius vedančių augalų (iš pvz. Erikinių šeimos).

Vietose po elektros laidais nebent auga paparčių ir panašios augmenijos, bet tuo atveju reikėtų turbūt išskirti konkrečias teritorijas?

Neatkeičiau atgal į `natural=meadow`, klausiu nes `source` šio pakeitimo mini research. Gal žinai kažką ko nežinau aš? :)
Aurimas Fišeras (2020-12-25 14:40:52+00:00): Ne, nieko specialaus šiuo atveju nežinau.
Dabar pažiūrėjęs, net negaliu atsakyti, kodėl taip pažymėjau, nes ir ortofoto, ir paskutinio apsilankymo metu čia buvo pieva.

Paprastai žymiu landuse=meadow, kai pieva yra nuolatos šienaujama (kas ne visuomet būna akivaizdu iš ortofoto), natural=heath, kai nešienaujama, pvz., po elektros laidais, aplink griovius, visokiuose užkampiuose ir pan. O jei didžiąją dalį ploto užima krūmai, tada jau natural=scrub.

Perskėliau multipoligoną ir pagrindinę dalį atkeičiau į landuse=meadow.
~nagisa (2020-12-25 14:49:24+00:00): Aš kaip tik keletą nuotraukų padariau šiandien eidamas pro šalį: https://imgur.com/a/yrxlvk9

Pagrindinis pievos plotas yra šienaujamas bet ne kiekvienais metais. Pvz. kiek pamenu valstybė nušienavo ją ir 2018-ų, ir 2019-ų vasarą, bet ne 2020-ų.
~nagisa (2020-12-25 14:51:00+00:00): Vėliau tiksliau sudalinsiu ir sužymėsiu kas kur.

Ačiū.
eggie (2020-10-07 08:47:12+00:00): Dag Jorg.. Je tagging klopt niet.
name=.. rendert en dat is de niet correcte naam.
name:nl bijtaggen is niet gebruikelijk en rendert niet.
Wat is je probleem hier om het steeds maar weer aan te passen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-07 08:56:56+00:00): Je aanpassing https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92093899
  ??
American Spareribs	wordt American sparibs
eggie (2020-10-07 11:34:37+00:00): reverted by changeset #92109076
eggie (2020-10-07 08:54:13+00:00): Dag japoppe.. 
Lijkt me helemaal correct zo.
MVG,
eggie
chnuessli (2020-10-14 15:43:34+00:00): Beide Fussballfelder gehören zum FC Tuggen.
Gruess :)