piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-12-18 18:32:50+00:00): graphHopper en osrm routeren inderdaad niet. .., maar ik weet niet hoe die omgaat met veerroutes? Het zijn natuurlijk pedestrians en footways die in het traject ziiten. 
. maar de "fout" zat niet in de tagging.
bicycle=dismount hoort juist  te routeren. 
Denk aan trappen met gootjes
eggie (2019-12-18 18:38:32+00:00): De veerdiensten bij Dordrecht heb ik allemaal als cycleway getagd. Daar gaan de routers osrm en graphHopper wel goed mee om.... ,maar nogmaals het was goed getagd hier op dat surface=paved na.
highway=path zou ook nog een mogelijkheid zijn.
hatul (2021-04-19 20:36:14+00:00): אתה בטוח שיש פה חניון לילה? השילוט של החניון נמצא מזרחה יותר.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6430359000
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-07 15:00:21+00:00): * splitting highways without reason
* deletes several large riverbanks

some restored/refined.

DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
dekatherm (2019-12-18 18:42:37+00:00): Hallo Piet,

du hast hier mit einer enormen Präzision gearbeitet, völlig unabhängig davon habe ich einige Fragen:
- Warum hast du mehrere Teiche gelöscht?
- Warum soll landuse=residential nicht das ganze Dorf umfassen? So ist es fast überall sonst üblich.

Viele Grüße
Piet183 (2019-12-19 18:53:35+00:00): Hallo dekatherm,

Die Teiche habe ich entfernt, da diese auf privaten Grundstücken liegen und deswegen meiner Meinung nach nicht in die Karte gehören. Im Forum wurde das Thema Private Grundstücke bereits diskutiert: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68191. 
ich mache es, um den Siedlungsbereich genauer zu erfassen, siehe Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

Viele Grüße
GeorgeKaplan (2019-12-19 14:27:06+00:00): Bonjour,

Besoin d'aide pour faire un trou dans une forêt ? Il faut transformer le way pour déplacer ses tags sur une nouvelle relation de type multipolygon et y ajouter ce way en tant que outer et le trou en tant qu'inner. Je peux vous guider ou le faire si vous voulez.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78596715
Владимир К (2020-05-25 12:10:25+00:00): Добрый день!
Что означает ваша линия без тегов?
Supaplex (2019-12-19 10:47:52+00:00): 完工了嗎?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78597133
PT-53 (2019-12-19 08:27:29+00:00): Hallo bigbug21,
Du hast diese Treppe
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756663326/history
neu eingeziechnet. Im OSM-Inspector wird dazu jetzt ein Hinweis "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.18520&lat=48.78467&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
Trennst Du die Treppe noch entspr. auf und ergänzt die Layer-Markmale?
Fragende Grüße
bigbug21 (2019-12-19 21:08:31+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, wird gleich korrigiert!
PT-53 (2020-02-11 08:01:37+00:00): Hallo EinKonstanzer,
für diese Service-Fläche
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/756663703/history
wird in keep right ein Hinweis "schwimmende Inseln, Linie 756663703" angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=116022497
Das gleiche im OSM-Inspector:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.68358&lat=48.10486&zoom=11&opacity=0.34
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-02-23 09:22:24+00:00): Hallo EinKonstanzer, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
Korrekter OSMI-Link:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.68358&lat=48.10486&zoom=11&opacity=0.34
PT-53 (2020-08-02 09:41:13+00:00): Hallo EinKonstanzer,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
EinKonstanzer (2020-08-02 10:35:06+00:00): Nein, hab anderes zu tun
PT-53 (2020-08-02 11:09:09+00:00): Und für Deine anderen Altlasten hast Du dann natürlich auch keine Zeit!?
user_5359 (2019-12-18 19:45:33+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Danke für die ERgänzung der Details. Öffnungszeiten kommen ohne Trennwörter wie "und" aus. Ebenso bestehen Telefonummern auch Ländervorwahl, Ortsvorwahl und Telefonnummer mit Trennzeichen Leerzeichen (+49 3621 12345).
Markus366 (2020-01-03 15:40:45+00:00): Hallo, du hattest zuletzt diese Linie bearbeitet. Es kam dieser Hinweis dazu https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2013783#map=14/51.6468/10.3196&layers=N Ist die Stromtrasse noch da?

Markus
bahnpirat (2020-01-03 22:18:56+00:00): Hochspannungsleitung wurde für den Abzweig nach Herzberg auf historisch geändert. Dort gab es eine Notiz, dass der Abschnitt abgebaut sei.
eggie (2019-12-24 13:25:23+00:00): Ha Nilodo... Je vergeet hoop ik toch niet commentaar toe te voegen aan je edits bij upload?
MVG,
Eggie
czubi (2019-12-19 15:49:57+00:00): Hallo Floba,
schön das du uns bei OSM mithilfst.
Ich möchte dir als Beginner meine Hilfe anbieten, wenn du Fragen hast schreib mir einfach eine Mail.
Deine ersten Änderungen sind gut. 2 Anmerkungten: 1. Leg dir ESRI als Hintergrundbild, dass ist deutlich schärfer als Bing und 2. name=* gilt nur für Eigennamen.
Das Gebäude heist also nicht "Bosch" sondern die Firma. Im einfachsten Fall office=company+name=Bosch.
Carto'Cité (2019-12-24 13:59:18+00:00): Bonjour Pascal.
Pour un parking vélo détruit ce serait plus juste d'utiliser un préfixe, par exemple demolished:amenity=bicycle_parking, plutôt que de changer le nombre de places. Je me suis permis la correction :-)
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
Pascal Rigaux (2019-12-24 14:11:46+00:00): Salut. En fait il reste toujours la peinture qui dit que c'est un parking vélo (cf https://twitter.com/mdb18e/status/1207384166096084992/photo/2 ) donc je n'ai pas mis détruit... mais je n'étais pas sûr du choix... a+
eggie (2019-12-18 22:26:14+00:00): Jasper.. Lijkt me prima. Niet elke kaart laat het zien, maar osm is natuurlijk wel een database. 
Het is aan de diverse kaartenmakers om het te laten renderen.
MVG,
Eggie
ndm (2019-12-20 00:00:11+00:00): It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?
ndm (2019-12-20 00:03:09+00:00): This signpost is already marked https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6985964877
eggie (2019-12-18 22:34:15+00:00): Dag koasn.. beter een terugmelding doen naar het Kadaster, want uit hun administratie zit de ingeslopen fout.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=mienewei%2032&resultOffset=0&objectId=0055200000271949&geometry.x=185913.71&geometry.y=563067.185&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0055010000271950
Doe je dat zelf?

MVG,
eggie
ndm (2019-12-20 00:00:04+00:00): It looks like you're importing Sustrans copyright information into OpenStreetMap -- do you have an appropriate licence to do this? Was this discussed on the imports / talk-gb mailing lists?
Enock4seth (2021-07-28 21:35:43+00:00): I have moved this node to the nearest building that looks more like a church, could you kindly review/confirm/revert. Thank you.
Sammyhawkrad (2021-07-29 15:34:31+00:00): I think you have placed it at the right location. I added it from the position of a note
Hjart (2019-12-18 22:38:06+00:00): Mange af de bygninger du har importeret her, kunne med fordel være set lidt bedre efter først.
trial (2020-07-01 17:52:32+00:00): Bonjour, Kerprat est en continuité urbaine du bourg de Guidel, ce n'est plus un hameau (hamlet) mais un sous-quartier (neighbourhood), non ?
trial (2022-08-21 15:11:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7067526361#map=17/47.79058/-3.48200 drôle de version bretonne ;-)
hackthemap (2020-11-09 21:31:19+00:00): Hi bigbug21,

weißt du ob die ganzen mit opening_date=2019-12-15 ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date ) getaggten railways hier auch exakt an diesem Tag eröffnet/fertiggestellt wurden?
Wenn ja würde ich die zu start_date ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date ) umtaggen, aber wenn das Eröffnungsdatum unbekannt ist, dann entferne ich den obsoleten opening_date Tag einfach.

LG
hackthemap
bigbug21 (2020-11-11 16:46:11+00:00): Achso, ja, klar. Die Bahnanlagen gingen tatsächlich entsprechend in Betrieb.
hackthemap (2020-11-11 21:38:00+00:00): Auch exakt am 2019-12-15?
bigbug21 (2020-11-13 22:24:23+00:00): Ja genau, siehe auch https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahnhof_Frankfurt_(Main)_Gateway_Gardens.
viloan (2019-12-18 20:33:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kartonage (2019-12-19 19:26:34+00:00): Hej, 

bitte den Quatsch unterlassen. Danke.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78580401
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78484692
osmviborg (2019-12-19 08:11:19+00:00): Hvorfor har du ikke gennemgået dette?
skquinn (2020-01-11 07:06:28+00:00): Using the slash to mean "or" in opening_hours is *not* valid syntax, and JOSM's validator considers it messed up enough that it has to be fixed by hand. The correct way to say "or" is using a comma, for example: Sa,Su 12:00-20:00
MapMakerGal (2019-12-18 22:18:47+00:00): Ola, en primeiro lugar moitas grazas polas túas edicións. En segundo lugar pra debuxar edificios o mellor é empregar a capa de Catastro e seguir a súa contorna. E para imaxes a capa Pnoa Spain.

Moitas grazas por mellorar Galicia.
jjmontes (2019-12-19 09:12:04+00:00): Hola! Gracias. Tomo nota. Para imaxes síe stba usando Pnoa, alternando as veces pra intentar ver a pranta dos edificios. Non sabía que había unha capad e Catastro! botareille un ollo xa que pensaba acabar esas cuadras ao redor de Santiago de Vigo, e revisarei os edificios creados usando o Catastro.
MapMakerGal (2019-12-19 10:06:18+00:00): Moitas grazas pola túa comprensión. O único máis que podo dicirche é ás veces non carga a capa Catastro e hai que ter pacencia...
colgza (2020-01-03 15:25:32+00:00): Do you know what happened to the Wikidata tags on the various SEPTA regional rail routes? I had previously used them to create an interactive map of them on Wikipedia (see link below), but I noticed that this map is now broken. Was there something wrong with my use of these tags?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SEPTA_Regional_Rail#/map/0
colgza (2020-01-03 15:34:09+00:00): Ignore the above link. I just commented out the map on that Wikipedia page, so it won't show up.
clay_c (2020-01-03 17:16:13+00:00): I moved the wikidata tags to the parent route_master relations. I assumed this was the proper way to represent things—I didn't realize that {{maplink}} was dependent on it.

Ideally, {{maplink}} itself should be updated to support route_master relations as well. But in the meantime, feel free to restore the wikidata tags to the routes.
eggie (2019-12-18 22:19:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Het lijkt me beter om gino's zuiphuis van de kaart te verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
MarvinMep (2020-05-06 22:03:00+00:00): De onde você tirou esse nome. A Rua Padre Elias Gorayeb é outra. Esta não tem nome.
MarvinMep (2020-05-06 22:12:01+00:00): Isso não é um edifício de apartamentos. É a sede do clube (no qual ele está inserido).
eggie (2019-12-18 22:16:42+00:00): Dag givano.. Polski Smak is hier al getgad. Nog een keer... dat is niet nodig.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-19 09:17:26+00:00): Duplikaat supermarkt verwijderd. Winkelbestand aangepast.
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2019-12-19 05:11:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
osmviborg (2019-12-19 08:04:01+00:00): Du burde gennemgå og sammenlægge rigtig mange af disse polygoner.
floridaeditor (2019-12-20 19:17:37+00:00): Hello, as you probably notice, you changed the Indian River Lagoon to an island, which is incorrect. I have reverted your edit. Please do not do this again. Thank you.
-- floridaeditor
viloan (2019-12-18 22:34:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
smootheFiets (2020-01-17 14:41:50+00:00): Voir ma question sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67601384

Serait-ce une bonne idée de changer le "sentier privé" comme suit ?
noname=yes
name= (donc, éffacer l'attribut)
access=private (or no, permissive, ...)

Je me suis déjà permis de changer les "voiries innomées"
IWBRABANT (2020-01-22 11:55:23+00:00): oui le sentier privé peut avoir les attributs que tu donnes. J'avais indiqué cela pour que ceux qui utilisent les openrunner et autre voient clairement que le sentier gris est privé. A toi de voir ce qui convient.
viloan (2019-12-18 23:06:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
solmaps2 (2019-12-19 00:31:17+00:00): Did you know? You could sharpen the edges of your placed buildings by hitting the default (Q) button after selection??

---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #MappingHuman
user_5359 (2019-12-19 04:53:10+00:00): Hello! Not every object inside a park is a park. For a better description of your objetcs please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:playground and https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground
Yotsen (2024-09-09 15:40:49+00:00): Hey, don't add personal information like this to the map. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
UT93 (2024-08-16 11:53:01+00:00): Grüsse
Ich frage mich, weswegen du in diesem Änderungssatz, den weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31054500 mit dem Attribut "access=no", also zugänglich für niemanden, versehen hast?
SteBernd (2024-08-16 22:21:37+00:00): habs korrigiert, merci
DUGA (2021-09-20 19:05:53+00:00): What is "demolished:building=yesbuilding=yes"???

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331182029/history#map=19/45.52084/-122.92016
jhmeniscus (2021-09-20 20:19:26+00:00): Just bad syntax. I must have thought I was overwriting the old tag but just put it in front of it. Fixed now. Thanks @dDuga.
gscholz (2019-12-21 10:16:49+00:00): Hi Jéssica,
this changeset has created dozens of errors in the osm database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-52.43898&lat=-28.22581&zoom=16&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Guido
gscholz (2020-01-01 12:12:18+00:00): Hi Jéssica, 
esses erros ainda existem. Você pode responder a esta solicitação, assumir sua responsabilidade e corrigi-las?
Guido
azakh-world (2019-12-19 21:30:53+00:00): Hi.
Don't you mix up network and owner corporation for New Jersey light rail system? As I can find in the Internet, the network is called Hudson-Bergen Light Rail (HBLR) and the owner is called "NJ Transit". Aren't they?

Best regards,
Alexey
clay_c (2019-12-19 22:06:44+00:00): Are they truly part of a different network? NJ Transit owns them, NJ Transit operates them, NJ Transit sets fares and sells tickets, and NJ Transit is what's painted on the vehicles. In my opinion, that justifies changing their network tags to match NJ Transit's bus and rail services.

Though I could see the case for either way. What advantage do you see in keeping their network tags as "HBLR" etc.?

-Clay
azakh-world (2019-12-20 22:33:13+00:00): The main advantage of putting network name to "network" tag and operator name to "operator" tag is to reflect the true state of things.

I think the three networks: Newark Light Rail, Hudson-Bergen Light Rail and Philadelphia River LINE - should be considered as separate networks because they are separated in space, NJ Transit separates them on its website, in particular provides distinct detailed map for each of them. But now the networks have lost their names in OSM and became indistinguishable, while "network" and "operator" tags duplicate each other.

BTW, though vehicle painting should not be a strong argument, I've easily found vehicle pictures with on-the-side "Newark Light Rail" and "Hudson-Bergen Light Rail" labels.

-Alexey
clay_c (2019-12-21 04:53:25+00:00): Should the Atlantic City Line be its own network, separate from the rest of the NJ Transit rail lines? Should the 'A' and 'B' divisions of the NYC Subway be separated into networks?

The issue you're having seems like it could be solved with a spatial query. If you're looking for only the HBLR, why not search for NJ Transit light rail in a bounding box? Or search for the route relations that make up the HBLR?

I think we're talking past each other here. I can see the case for keeping them distinct, and though I may disagree, I'm not gonna be mad if you change them back. I just don't see what the consequences are of this change.
azakh-world (2019-12-23 10:35:12+00:00): I could meet my needs with a spacial query, fortunately these networks are not overlapping, what might not be the case. I still see a serious disadvantage of your approach: data coarsening/merging may be simply done at any time, while it's hard or impossible to restore details out of coarsened/averaged data. As I could find, Newark Light Rail or HBLR are real, distinguishable and identifiable network-like features which users may want to query OSM by name, without dealing with accurate geometry, outer sources or (God forbid!) hardcoding OSM ids.

Thank you for your patience and time.
viloan (2019-12-19 03:14:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
compdude (2020-02-05 06:00:09+00:00): Do you have any proof that this road is State Route 217? Given that you've added several other state routes to OSM and have had people question them, I feel like you just made this one up.
Carnildo (2020-03-11 01:06:14+00:00): I've removed the highway designation.
Carnildo (2019-12-20 08:21:52+00:00): When was that designated WA-907?  The state Department of Transportation doesn't seem to know anything about it.
compdude (2020-02-19 06:41:36+00:00): I'm going to remove the ref tags, as you've provided no evidence that WA 907 exists.
AkuAnakTimur (2019-12-19 04:00:30+00:00): Also in this changeset: fixed a poorly mapped highway
solmaps2 (2019-12-19 05:42:57+00:00): 很努力！ 本地知识是最好的！

---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #MappingHuman
tux67 (2019-12-19 08:34:10+00:00): How sure are you that the additional Service Road you added is for public access?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78612823
tux67 (2019-12-20 10:36:13+00:00): any feedback for me?
volojusa (2019-12-20 10:44:42+00:00): Hi tux67,

Thanks for looking into my edit, from the aerial image I couldn’t find any gates to add it as private road nor there is any street view available to make the road private. Please suggest me the proper edit in these type of cases. Is destination a good tag to add in these scenarios?

Thanks in advance,
volojusa.
tux67 (2019-12-27 14:20:59+00:00): I would not be able to determine from an areal view the access rights but my suspicion would be private - knowing German industrial and commercial areas.
AkuAnakTimur (2019-12-19 04:51:35+00:00): *Some highways were tagged up one hierarchy higher than they ought to be

Yeah, there would be consequences especially for ride-sharing for-profit organisations, but let me know if routings started not making any kind of sense.

It should be a lesson for these organisations to actually perform optimisations on their side too.
Andrei Klopau (2020-01-20 08:10:38+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Подскажите пожалуйста, разрыв дороги (Московское шоссе) чем обусловлен? Насколько я знаю, дороги класса primary должны составлять цельный дорожный граф, а тут обрывается на ровном месте
user_10527108 (2020-01-20 08:27:03+00:00): Ошибка же, никакого разрыва не должно быть. поправил вроде
Andrei Klopau (2020-01-20 09:31:40+00:00): Спасибо!
Warin61 (2019-12-20 06:15:23+00:00): The multipolygon relation 10435734 Gardener Reserve has duplicated segments. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.94397&lat=-37.79897&zoom=18

As the park does not share ways with anything else .. it may be better mapped as a single simple way.