piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kartonage (2021-10-08 10:41:20+00:00): Hi,

it is very unlikely that this office is on the university campus.
You also seems to map exactly like another user. Is this an organised mapping activity?
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/samroggers)

Best regards
dcapillae (2021-10-08 11:11:35+00:00): Hi! Great job! I have added the number of levels underground in the building.

If you need to indicate that a part of the building is underground, you can use "building:part=yes" + "building:levels:underground=1", including the underground levels (1, 2, 3, etc.). More details on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels

Thanks for your collaboration.

Regards,

Daniel
Groctel (2021-10-08 13:33:33+00:00): Thank you for the feedback! I'm still fairly new to iD and there's a lot of information to consider. I'll read that wiki page!
mini-me (2021-10-08 17:17:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13300259
Сломано отношение
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990606761
"река" - не нужна
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-09 10:27:02+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and applied correct tagging for World of Smoke & Vape POI in changeset 183867728

https://osm.org/changeset/183867728
Ds5rUy (2021-10-08 13:09:00+00:00): Hi,

access=restricted is a known tagging error, see:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Possible_tagging_mistakes
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Drestricted

Would you please correct that to "access=private"?
eggie (2021-10-08 10:58:17+00:00): Verkeerd commentaar.. UItgelijnd mbv bgt omtrekgericht
Filip009 (2022-09-18 12:11:56+00:00): Dobrý deň, keď má potok layer=2, znamená to, že lieta? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991155523
misko903 (2022-09-18 12:55:54+00:00): Dobrý deň, určite áno, choďte sa pozrieť do terénu ;)
Filip009 (2022-09-18 13:48:50+00:00): Okej, a teraz bez srandy, aký to má význam? :)
UrSuS (2023-03-16 07:24:51+00:00): Don't merge roads when they are part of "route" relation!!!
Frans S (2021-12-04 13:07:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings rather inaccurately drawn
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112259585
salvoconducto (2021-10-10 17:02:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
Frans S (2021-12-04 13:10:57+00:00): Hello.  I reviewed most of your mapping and have to say that your mappings were rather poor and inaccurate. Whenever you want to map again , please improve your mapping skills.

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112260079
Frans S (2021-12-04 12:41:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawnE: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
 These comments are also for your other changesets.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112260483
Frans S (2021-10-15 11:49:56+00:00): Hi.  I commentd on several changesets.
You are doing quite well. Just pay attention on the issues I mentioned.
Also. don't connect buldings to each other with their nodes.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112260549
canfe (2021-10-09 13:42:00+00:00): E' sparito il nome della chiesa e l'altitudine.
giorgio92 (2021-10-27 07:39:46+00:00): aggiunto nome chiesa e specifiche
canfe (2021-10-30 10:44:28+00:00): Corretto telefono con spazi, tolto abbreviazione che non ci vuole mai e migliorato geometria e messo cortile.
PS: le file di alberi non vanno mappate come alberi singoli ma come tree row (vedi nota sul grass)
adamh (2021-10-13 00:28:14+00:00): To be honest I'm not sure why these railway lines are even mapped. There's no source information for the original geometry. The lines and the route of the lines is not evident in the real world, there's a great big shopping centre and carpark there.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=abandoned
says  "A tag to map former railways, where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure."
I'd say none of the mapped abandoned rail lines on the Mornington side of the Nepean highway meet this criteria.
(General comments for all to respond on - not directed at you Ewen)
Ewen Hill (2021-10-13 00:38:14+00:00): Hi Adam,
   Thanks for the note and I agree. Currently I am working through Victorian disused lines and then reducing them to abandoned initially as there are a large number (a lot of which I am guilty of six or so years ago). I was then going to work through some of these, line by line for more accuracy and removing these built over candidates. The key focus with this task was not to render on the map. I am also working through old stations and station_sites and correcting these. It's a WIP that has taken longer than I first imagined.
richlv (2024-05-03 18:09:00+00:00): Sveiki, pamanīju, ka šajā izmaiņu kopā https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268498822/history "source" tagam pievienots "Balticmaps".

Tā kā šīs izmaiņas ir no 2021. gada, iespējams, viss jau atrisināts - bet drošības labad jāpiemin, ka OSM nedrīkst neko kopēt no Balticmaps. Ja kādas tādas izmaiņas vēl palikušas, tās visas vajadzētu atcelt.
mariotomo (2021-11-16 00:20:18+00:00): hola, disculpa si te comento a un mes de distancia, vi que editabas con "StreetComplete" y no me fijé en el contenido del conjunto de cambios.  Le pusiste dirección al edificio de la estación?  "addr:housenumber" sería el número cívico (identificativo de una puerta) y tiene sentido en combinación con los otros elementos "namespace" addr (el prefijo).  quizás era otra cosa que querías hacer?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-10-08 12:31:33+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112166527, 112195243, 112197045, 112200846, 112204683, 112205547, 112205879, 112206259, 112206651, 112207463, 112207969, 112208047, 112208302, 112208699, 112208992, 112209219, 112209487, 112209509, 112209972, 112210083, 112210332, 112210371, 112211000, 112211106, 112211533, 112211651, 112211792, 112211945, 112212150, 112212327, 112212470, 112212564, 112212765, 112213318, 112213674, 112215218, 112215556, 112241026, 112241400, 112241882, 112242131, 112242212, 112242324, 112242344, 112242497, 112242763, 112242816, 112242885, 112243124, 112243299, 112243349, 112243364, 112243481, 112243509, 112243591, 112243710, 112243735, 112243921, 112243922, 112244074, 112244087, 112244212, 112244264, 112244332, 112244445, 112244563, 112244592, 112244849, 112244870, 112244978, 112245083, 112245250, 112245532, 112245690, 112245744, 112245800, 112245946, 112246039, 112246225, 112246362, 112246389, 112246526, 112246653, 112246656, 112246851, 112246915, 112246973, 112247239, 112247386, 112247523, 112247566, 112247692, 112247808, 112247809, 112247984, 112248090, 112248134, 112248251, 112248288, 112248453, 112248509, 112249672, 112249880, 112250148, 112250292, 112250513, 112250799, 112250849, 112251030, 112251180, 112251206, 112251472, 112251497, 112251648, 112251663, 112251860, 112252000, 112252018, 112252194, 112252294, 112252458, 112252672, 112252711, 112252891, 112253002, 112253162, 112253404, 112253416, 112253598, 112253772, 112254027, 112254208, 112254357, 112254503, 112254537, 112254792, 112254828, 112255061, 112255285, 112255367, 112255617, 112255817, 112255967, 112256157, 112256357, 112256436, 112256516, 112256655, 112256658, 112256861, 112256973, 112257050, 112257349, 112257991, 112258181, 112258642, 112258910, 112259169, 112259432, 112259711, 112259991, 112260256, 112260457, 112260636, 112260896, 112261044.
Dimusoika (2021-10-08 12:57:13+00:00): Error mío con la descripción. Etiquetas de rejas de accesso, de caseta de seguridad y además agregué una reja
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-09 10:58:15+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and applied correct tagging for World of Smoke & Vape POI in changeset 183869090

https://osm.org/changeset/183869090
kaykim- (2021-10-11 01:17:04+00:00): qual o motivo?
DressyPear4 (2021-10-11 05:09:00+00:00): Já foi discutido com a comunidade uma vez que não se deve colocar uma cidade toda ou parte dela como área residencial.
Primeiro motivo seria a bagunça de linhas grudadas com vias edificações etc..
Segundo motivo que dentro dela ficam áreas comerciais, áreas industriais, praças ,matas e outras áreas que não são residenciais.
Terceiro motivo, se traçar um condomínio ou loteamento e definir como landuse=residential, ficaria uma área residencial dentro da 'área residencial maior', na qual estaria duplicada.
Considere apenas demarcar o limite de um condomínio ou loteamento, o mesmo com landuse=industrial, separando cada empresa e não um conjunto todo.
kaykim- (2021-10-11 13:35:18+00:00): Existe algum local no qual essas regras estejam escritas? Por que na plataforma existem inúmeras cidades nas quais existem extensas áreas demarcadas como landuse residential, inviabilizando o seu argumento.
DressyPear4 (2021-10-11 15:53:26+00:00): Agora não lembro se foi discutido no fórum ou no grupo do telegram (antigo que foi desativado devido a um número alto de spam).
Realmente há vários lugares, geralmente é feito por mapeadores novos, e outra que é difícil corrigir ou fiscalizar uma área grande igual ao Brasil.
kaykim- (2021-10-11 16:20:45+00:00): mas é proibido adicionar área residencial nas cidades brasileiras? Todas as áreas que fiz eram realmente residenciais. Além disso, o teu primeiro motivo não fez sentido nenhum para mim, e o terceiro motivo também parece não ter nada a ver com as edições que fiz. No caso de haver comércio em landuse residential, esse tipo de uso é feito em cidades da europa tranquilamente, tanto é que me baseei nelas para tornar a minha edição mais coerente com como a comunidade OSM trata essas regiões. Além disso, antes de desfazer as minhas edições acho que nós poderíamos ter discutido isso antes ne? ngm é obrigado a advinhar regras escritas em algum grupo de telegram.
DressyPear4 (2021-10-11 18:27:41+00:00): Peço desculpas se me equivoquei em modificar antes de questionar, geralmente o pessoal raramente responde comentários, também acho que não há nada documentado sobre isso, seria mais uma questão de organização ao invés de erro. 
Se acha que deveria estar como antes pode usar esse site para reverter
http://level0.osmz.ru/
kaykim- (2021-10-12 19:06:53+00:00): Tranquilo. Só me incomodei porque essas edições aqui me tomaram bastante tempo, então pensei que fosse mais produtivo se discutíssemos antes. Eu também gostaria de entender o porque de ser uma "questão de organização", juro que não compreendi direito o seu motivo para desfazer as áreas. Além disso, creio que demarcar essas áreas com o seu uso predominante (residencial), além de promover uma melhor visualização da mancha urbana, adiciona dados que podem ser importantes para quem utiliza o OSM como banco de dados para construir mapas. Eu tentei ser o mais fiel possível ao modo como essas edições são feitas lá fora (já que no Brasil o uso de áreas residenciais para marcar manchas urbanas residenciais é bastante escasso e eu não sei bem o porquê).
kaykim- (2021-10-12 19:10:00+00:00): Além disso, como eu reverteria os apagamentos das áreas residenciais sem acabar com as adições de áreas naturais que você fez? Eu não conheço bem a ferramenta que você me indicou.
KirillB (2021-10-08 13:38:12+00:00): Service road to Übergabebahnhof Beddingen was explictly tagged "yes" for bicycles and pedestrians as it available for them
Dodko (2021-10-09 20:56:50+00:00): Namiesto gymnastiky sa tam viac hodí
leisure=fitness_station
sport=fitness
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station
salvoconducto (2021-10-08 13:40:49+00:00): Please add "source"="N50", it would be helpful to distinguish data as a consumer.
FredrikEdler (2021-10-08 16:06:43+00:00): Yep, Will add "kartverket N50" along "kartverket" as source to help the consumers, still the import guide states "kartverket" is sufficient as source
ref
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway#Import_av_arealdekke
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:52:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143713927, 143713921 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
user_5359 (2021-10-10 15:16:39+00:00): Hello! You add many nodes with the tag "operator:wikipedia=de"="Die Schweizerische Post". Please notice the typo, the correct spelling is "operator:wikipedia"="de:Die Schweizerische Post". Please correct this error.
BBMaper (2021-11-15 07:42:49+00:00): Hello, I'll do it. Thanks for your comment.
Dodko (2021-10-09 21:01:18+00:00): Hodili by sa tam značky
amenity=social_facility
social_facility=nursing_home
social_facility:for=senior

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:social_facility
arh1024 (2021-12-13 07:25:44+00:00): ^ ok, je to tam
ToniE (2021-10-08 14:05:45+00:00): Hi Steven,

bitte keine beschreibenden name="Jägerstand" oder ="Hunting Stand" taggen, wenn dort kein entsprechendes Schild zu sehen ist.

amenity=hunting_stand ist vollkommen ausreichend.

'name is the name only' und keine Beschreibung des Objektes.

VG
Toni
Lee Carré (2021-10-09 12:04:33+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
iWowik (2021-12-06 04:54:32+00:00): Are you monitoring someone else's edits and something is bothering you?
osmviborg (2021-10-08 14:50:29+00:00): "Opdateringer jvf. Vores Elnet". Jeg går ud fra det er Open Data. Har du et link?
aupdk (2021-10-08 15:02:04+00:00): Værsgo: https://ledningsoplysning.energifyn.dk/portal/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=090280233985423a8c7c50ce47823336
osmviborg (2021-10-08 17:29:28+00:00): Retten til fri afbenyttelse, licens, hvor findes den?
eggie (2021-10-08 15:14:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback: Om in de gaten te houden.. Een doodlopende weg kan nooit oneway=yes zijn. Dan zit je erop gevangen.
Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes.
Dan toevoegen 
oneway:bicycle=no  en evt. ook voor moped en mofa. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
baumann3141 (2021-10-10 16:56:32+00:00): Please consider splitting your edits in three (for the current case) according to the geographic region where you are editing for your future edits. It makes it much easier for others to review your edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112267281
eggie (2021-10-08 15:21:24+00:00): Dag Wweefreeman..
name=Stable is een verkeerd gebruik van de nametag.
Ik zal de naam Stable verwijderen.
Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. Beter niets aan veranderen.
Wanneer je gebouwen wilt splitsen dan kun je een extra laag op het gebouw leggen met buildig:part=barn  en daar de building:levels op bijtaggen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-08 15:29:43+00:00): De BAG data heb ik hersteld.. 
Even als voorbeeld.. 
name=Stable verwijderd en de info op building:part=stable en house gezet.

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2021-10-08 15:34:05+00:00): Aanvulling:  De landuse=farmyard kun je ook over de gebouwen leggen. Het is een transparant. 
Het erf omvat immers ook de gebouwen. 
gr eggie
BCNorwich (2021-10-08 16:37:41+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

How does the service road get through your new fence? Is there a gate, or a gap in the fence?

Need any help please just ask here.

Regards Bernard.
Tim Hirst (2021-10-09 13:08:06+00:00): Thanks Bernard! Managed to figure out how to add the gate this morning :-)
SHARCRASH (2021-10-08 14:47:17+00:00): + new elements
AlaskaDave (2022-10-15 07:38:28+00:00): Hi,

I was working in the area of this changeset and saw that you had added a surface tag to a way that's currently tagged as a track.

way id:320167785

The track tag was applied long ago and I don't think it's correct. Many old tracks have been widened and are in continual use so my feeling is that this is an unclassified, unpaved highway. But I haven't been there and you have.

What's your opinion?
julcnx (2022-10-15 12:27:30+00:00): Hi Dave. Thanks for reaching out. If I recall it correctly, it was a 1-lane canal dirt track. I would normally leave it as a track because there seemed to be no residence along and while it can be used as a shortcut, it does not seem to be used as thru-traffic like nearby paved unclassified. 
Situation may have have changed since then.

I agree, there are tons of highway=track tagged long ago that deserve a better tag. I try to upgrade those sections in residential areas and the main roads between villages in more remote areas. For those rural/urban areas I find it more difficult to decide. Like you already do so well, I am also trying to add missing tags like surface, lanes so it’s easier to make a decision later.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112267868
AlaskaDave (2022-10-15 13:57:35+00:00): I don't have a need to change that tagging and it's not worth the drive out there to see it.

Looking at the fairly clear delineation of it in the imagery, it appears to be more than a track. I define a track as a way through that is visible but not a real "road", something you might want to think about before driving the family car on it. 

As in so many other things OSM, there's a lot of subjectivity that enters into our decisions about how to tag and why. LOL

Be well....
AlaskaDave (2022-10-15 13:59:55+00:00): I reckon this can wait. It's no biggie either way.
julcnx (2022-10-16 03:08:09+00:00): Hi Dave. 

As per the latest Thailand wiki minor road revision I worked on with Nat and others last year, highway classification would be tagged based on their purposes/importance, and not solely based on their surface, or smoothness tag (although those extra tags can help decide).

e.g. highway=track is used agricultural/forestry purposes, and it’s perfectly acceptable to have some paved. On the other hand, a link between two villages could be 4wd-only and would still be tagged as unclassified which is reserved for main minor roads (e.g. “quaternary”)

I know this may be different from the way you and others may have tagged in the past, but in the same time we had Grab converting every kind of minor road into residential, including tracks which had no surface tags, so we lost a huge amount of information and maps became unusable. The new revision is not perfect but it helps cleanup Grab’s mess and make the maps more consistent. 

If you have any concerns about the current scheme, please open a new ticket in the community site. 
Cheers, Julien
AlaskaDave (2022-10-17 00:56:57+00:00): Hi Julien,
As I said earlier, I don't have a favored outcome for this particular highway but as for the revised scheme, I can't agree with this:

"e.g. highway=track is used agricultural/forestry purposes, and it’s perfectly acceptable to have some paved"

Huh? Paved?

My solution for that situation is to tag the way as jighway=service with service=agrcultural and surface=*

Also, regarding cleaning up Grab's mess; that's up to Grab. We need to rein them in somehow, but I don't think it's wise to adjust our tagging to accommodate their incompetence. 

Grab is bad, but then so are many "legitimate" OSM mappers — I clean up messy tagging and multipolygons made by OSMers almost every time I open JOSM. Overall, Grab probably add more value than trouble. 

Cheers,

Dave
julcnx (2022-10-17 15:03:40+00:00): tracktype=grade1 is reserved for paved tracks only and is commonly used so it’s perfectly acceptable to have a paved highway=track since we tag roads based on their function, not their surface. 

I believe you may have missed the updates on the wiki, or they may not be good or clear enough, so let’s take the conversation in this topic: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/highways-wiki-revisions-feedback/4216

Cheers, Julien
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112267868
5m4u9 (2021-10-09 02:02:27+00:00): Hi, I will revert this edition because you delete elements that exist (view with maxar/esri imagery)
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:15:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-09 10:58:26+00:00): Cleaned up SEO spam and applied correct tagging for World of Smoke & Vape POI in changeset 183869090

https://osm.org/changeset/183869090
mueschel (2021-10-09 10:07:54+00:00): Something went very wrong here.
This import created  a huge number of areas, some of the overlapping, with only foreign tags. 
Please note that there is a set of rules that need to be followed to import data to OSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

For now, all these changes need to be reverted. If all the prerequisites from the guidelines have been fulfilled, they could be added again, using proper tagging schemes.
nurdafur (2021-12-30 18:22:44+00:00): Hallo Impact

Du hast in diesem Changeset bei der Frauenfelderstrasse das Tag bicycle=no zugefügt. Dies ist nicht korrekt. Dieses Tag wird nur dort benutzt, wo es explizit ein Fahrrad verboten Schild gibt.
In diesem Fall hier ist das Tag bicycle=use_sidepath zu verwenden.
Prüf doch bei deinen anderen Changesets, ob du das dort auch falsch kartografiert hast.
Liebe Grüsse,  einen guten Rutsch ins neue Jahr und weiterhin viel Spass beim Kartografieren. 
Urs
confusedbuffalo (2021-10-09 11:05:34+00:00): Watch out for mistakes in the source data, for this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225733760
there was no space in the postcode, I've fixed it now though
CjMalone (2021-10-09 11:30:39+00:00): Nice one, your right was just trusting the source data in this instance.

Another one that has caught me out when actually parsing postcodes is "AA1 OAA" instead of "AA1 0AA", it's actually a pretty common typeo.
confusedbuffalo (2021-10-10 15:32:18+00:00): I've been using https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-errors.html to look for various errors, and that sort of thing would also show up there
CjMalone (2021-10-10 16:20:46+00:00): I've written a quick script to query the FHRS API and format it into GeoJSON to be loaded into JOSM and worked with. (I've now fixed it to try and fix postcodes, or warn me.)

Do you have any tooling to help you work with NSUL? Or are you just using the tile layer?