piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bubix (2016-02-03 07:23:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36954114
de vries (2017-02-05 10:48:21+00:00): Hoi alkmaarder, Ik heb een paar vraagjes bij de rotonde die je hier getekend hebt. 
Het lijkt mij dat (een deel van) het fietspad aan de oostzijde tweerichtingsverkeer is. Op luchtfoto's meen ik een stippellijn midden op het fiets pad te zien en op mapillary zie ik een tweerichtingsverkeer bordje staan: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.617786414722225&lng=4.760002093333333&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=24H0_qzXPbLMbPLHw1QXRQ
Verder heb je verhogingen ingetekend. De stoepranden (barrier=kerb) die je hiervoor gebruikt zijn richtingsgevoelig; je dient de lage kant rechts te houden. hierdoor zijn sommige verhogingen verlagingen geworden, zoals deze: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395510242
Zou je hier nog eens naar willen kijken?
Mooi werk verder die rotonde.
mvg
solenoid jam (2024-11-17 18:34:41+00:00): Hello. I found many “Social Facility” objects added by you to the map.
I would like to know if there is any additional information that could help to verify these objects? Perhaps the page on the Internet of this project?
How much is these data today?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3983679621
jc86035 (2016-02-02 12:06:00+00:00): Are you just bad at English reading comprehension or did I waste half an hour trying to explain to you how expressways have a special classification?
jc86035 (2016-02-02 13:14:41+00:00): Don't change the highway type of roads any more, please. That was settled 5 years ago. Do something more productive with your time. You are obviously capable of editing.
naoliv (2016-02-03 01:55:53+00:00): Muito bom usando relação pra não duplicar os caminhos!
Marcos Medeiros (2016-02-03 02:24:05+00:00): Tem vários casos em que cometi esse erro (alguns já corrigidos) mas aprendi com um vídeo do usuário santamariense e deste então tenho feito desta forma.
Johnny Carlsen (2016-05-14 17:58:37+00:00): Ton Pao have a population of more than 10.000 which classifies it as a town. It is also listed on Wikipedia as a town: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cities_in_Thailand
I am not quite sure what the relationship between Bo Sang and Ton Pao is, so there is a chance that your edit was correct, but with no changeset comment it is difficult to tell why you changed it and whether or not it was a good reason.
Gnasher328 (2016-05-14 20:05:55+00:00): Hi Johnny
When I looked at the map, 'Bosang' was hidden by 'Ton Pao' at some levels.
I did look at the relative size and importance but as 'Bosang' is the better known and importantly signposted one did a 'tweak'. Right, wrong, open to suggestions, but it takes me back to early (and current) days of GPS navigation where the GPS names seemed to bear no relation to local signposts or bigger writing on a map.
I did a similar change where 'Chiang Mai' was not visible but 'Chiang Phuek' was in huge bold lettering.
naoliv (2016-02-04 01:55:40+00:00): opessoa, não adicione proibições de retorno quando a origem e destino for a própria via. Isso é errado.
Já é entendido que não se pode retornar na mesma rua.
opessoa (2016-02-04 10:07:57+00:00): Quem entende? Se existe a possibilidade de alteração, é por que não é entendido... Vários algoritmos de roteamento utilizam o retorno do OSM, o que acaba deixando a rota errada.
opessoa (2016-02-04 10:09:17+00:00): Todo o vértice de ligação possui a possibilidade de retorno, o que acarreta em diversos erros de roteamento.
naoliv (2016-02-04 10:32:50+00:00): Não, isso não acarreta em erro de roteamento.
Se você está vendo algum roteador criando rota errada e fazendo retorno para a mesma via em uma conexão, então isso é erro do roteador.
Se for por sua lógica então deveria haver uma restrição de retorno em cada trecho de rua no OSM.
opessoa (2016-02-04 10:43:59+00:00): Isso mesmo, o padrão deveria ser desmarcado, e não marcado. Eu entendo que daria trabalho, mas vários, e eu trabalho com isso... Vários roteadores tem esse problema, pois não há a restrição de retorno.
naoliv (2016-02-04 10:52:30+00:00): Mas ao inserir uma restrição desnecessária no OSM você está tentando resolver um problema que não cabe ao OSM (e sim ao aplicativo de roteamento).
Ao invés de "mapear para o renderizador" (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer) você estará "mapeando para o roteador", que é incorreto da mesma forma.
opessoa (2016-02-04 11:02:25+00:00): Tudo bem, mas qual a serventia do retorno para o OSM e para o renderizador? Eu entendo o que você está defendendo, eu só não entendo o por que de não poder alterar, se realmente naquele local, não há possibilidade de retornar... Independentemente, se for para roteador ou não... Há lugares, aonde há a possibilidade de retorno, com ilhas definidas por tinta, no asfalto... como seriam resolvidos esses casos?
naoliv (2016-02-04 11:13:00+00:00): Quando há ilha http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland ou qualquer outro tipo de obstáculo, bifurcação, etc, então representa-se o objeto e a restrição/permissão, se existir.
É o mesmo caso de mini-rotatórias http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout onde entende-se que há possibilidade e permissão de retorno.
A proibição de retorno geralmente é utilizada em bifurcações de vias ou envolvendo duas vias distintas. Por exemplo, perto da área que você editou existe esse trecho: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-26.89722/-49.23676
Nesse caso sim cabe uma restrição de retorno.
indigomc (2016-08-17 07:07:36+00:00): The place = city tagging was removed from Vellore city node in this edit.
NetWormKido (2016-02-02 16:55:45+00:00): Откуда такое смещение?
Дмитрий123231 (2016-07-07 09:13:26+00:00): исправил
Alecs01 (2016-03-07 20:17:49+00:00): Hi, same as http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36955372 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36955372  you edited this border: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211532185 to follow the golf course. Are you sure it is correct? Which are your surces? Thanks. Alecs
ColinMarquardt (2016-02-18 17:45:29+00:00): Cool, danke!
dieterdreist (2016-02-02 11:43:48+00:00): please do not add duplicates, the station is already mapped in great detail
maraf24 (2016-05-07 21:12:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33532152
Ta droga nie jest jednokierunkowa, z jednej strony jest tylko zakaz wjazdu, zresztą niedotyczący rowerów.
Alecs01 (2016-03-07 20:13:13+00:00): Hi, starting from this changeset, you heavily edited this border: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211532185 which was a straight line before you touched it. Which is the source of your edits? Thanks. Alecs
00crashtest (2016-03-08 02:51:44+00:00): zillow.com addresses
00crashtest (2016-03-08 02:57:29+00:00): and for properties that are not listed in Zillow, I used Google Maps to check whether the address is in San Francisco or Daly City
Alecs01 (2016-03-08 08:37:18+00:00): Please stop, we're not allowed to copy from neither Zillow or Google Maps, you should know that. Also, the actual addresses in the US doesn't necessarily match city or county boundaries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZIP_code#ZIP_codes_and_previous_zoning_lines, definitely you can't guess "by hand" where the actual border is.
Alecs01 (2016-03-08 08:40:32+00:00): A local user pointed me to this: https://data.sfgov.org/Geographic-Locations-and-Boundaries/Bay-Area-General-Zipped-Shapefile-Format-/ye46-7n65 If you open the shapefile, you see a straight line separating San Francisco and Daly City
pnorman_mechanical (2016-03-08 11:28:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37684419 where the changeset comment is: Remove changes from google
ika-chan! (2017-02-03 14:42:36+00:00): Hi, The A1 south of Liosion/Dimokratias Avenue near Agioi Anargyroi has a name: Kifisou Avenue. Please be more careful with the names.
Andrea Musuruane (2016-02-03 11:14:53+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM.

shop=alimentari è una combinazione errata.

Probabilmente un valore corretto è convenience:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:shop%3Dconvenience

Per il tagging della farmacia, dovresti compilare anche dispensing (=yes se è una farmacia, =no se è una parafarmacia):
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=pharmacy

Per tutti questi POI inoltre, dovresti specificare il nome.
Andrea Musuruane (2016-02-03 11:20:59+00:00): Mi sembra strano che il nome della strada sia "Casina Campei". 

Per segnare la cascina, fare un punto con tag place=farm + name=Casina Campei

L'indirizzo nel building è errato. Deve essere messo sul punto di accesso (porta, cancello, ingresso). Inoltre name=zubiena è errato.

I nomi in OSM si scrivono in questo modo:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:name
Andrea Musuruane (2016-02-03 11:21:44+00:00): Come detto in un'altra discussione, il tag shop=alimentari è errato. Inoltre bisognerebbe mettere il nome ai POI.
Nakaner-repair (2016-03-02 20:52:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 37574672 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of Jever61 which used data of the official cadastre of State of Lower Saxony. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37430497
mueschel (2016-02-04 19:55:59+00:00): Hi escada, 
I just fixed the spelling of "segregated" on two ways here and noticed way 395544389 has maxspeed = 50 and source:maxspeed=zone70. Could you check that?
Cheers & Happy Mapping,
Jan
escada (2016-02-05 04:22:24+00:00): Thanks for fixing the segregated. 
I removed the source:maxspeed. Was a letfover of the initial zone70 tagging.
Alecs01 (2016-03-07 20:14:57+00:00): Same as http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36955372 you edited this border http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211541668 a few times. Which is the source of your edits?
ma-rt-in (2018-03-14 18:41:09+00:00): Hallo,
was soll das EG2 bei manchen POI´s bedeuten?
Thomas22549 (2018-03-14 21:50:52+00:00): Eigentlich ist level=0 das Erdgeschoß. Die Europapassage hat aber zwei davon.
Der Eingang am Ballindamm liegt auf Straßenniveau, der Eingang Kleine Rosenstr./Mönckeberstr. auch - allerdings höher. In der Passage gibt es also zwei Ebenen, die "EG1" und "EG2" heißen (siehe auch https://www.europa-passage.de/das-center/centerplan/lageplan/ ). Das hatte ich - mangels anderer Ideen - erstmal so eingetragen.
Wäre level=0 mit level:ref="EG2" oder level:name="EG2" richtiger?
ma-rt-in (2018-03-20 18:32:19+00:00): naja das ist wirklich schwierig. Jedoch ist die derzeitige Methode und dein neuer Vorschlag m.M.n. als nicht zielführend. ein Kompromiss wäre deine Abkürzung in die Descripticon aufzunehmen. Natürlich ausgeschrieben.
RicoElectrico (2016-02-03 09:30:52+00:00): Dlaczego village_green? To jest coś co u nas raczej nie funkcjonuje, a często spotykane w Anglii (patrz wiki). W ogóle nie wiem czy jest sens zaznaczać w  parku każdy teren zadrzewiony.
mavl (2016-02-02 18:47:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Почему со здания ТЭЦ-2 удалён тег power=station?
disappointed (2016-02-03 05:16:50+00:00): Восстановил, не заметил, что при смене типа здания тег слетел.
mavl (2016-02-03 05:24:00+00:00): Спасибо.
彭小五 (2016-09-04 15:50:20+00:00): 想請問位於林口長庚北方的文化公園夜市 (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395556361)現在還有在特定星期存在於停車場嗎？或已經全部移至左側公園園區北邊？
Supaplex (2016-09-05 05:59:50+00:00): 我只是偶爾到這邊armchair mapping的人，看到note解掉的mapper，還得問當地人才行
Ильин Роман (2016-02-03 13:47:37+00:00): Что происходит то вообще? что значит ИСПОРТИЛИ??? что я испортил? Ваше белое пятно имеет большую ценность, видимо
Müszi (2016-02-03 17:21:18+00:00): Hi!

Are you sure that these roads are of type "highway=unclassified"? I would be very surprised to see a road of this type through the forest (ways 395485191 and 395560554).

You tagged way 395485191 with a name ("LuncaSprie-LacuSarat") that shows what places it connects. Please tag name and/or ref only if it is official (appears on a sign somewhere near the road).
Müszi (2016-02-03 17:02:03+00:00): Hi!

Are you sure that all these tracks are of type "grade1"? For example, ways 201124698 and 395566246 look more like a "grade5" on the satellite map.

If you draw roads based on the satellite map, it's OK - but if you don't know the track type, better don't tag the track type.
chillly (2016-02-02 14:13:40+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM.

If you want to add steps you can use the tag highway=steps, rather than highway=footway. This will then render differently on the Standard map. If the steps really are called 'Steep steps' then your name is fine (this would usually be on a sign naming the steps rather than a sign warning that the steps are steep). If you resorted to the name to describe the steps then it would be better to remove it and use the steps tag.

HTH
Mojgan Jadidi (2016-02-02 18:14:28+00:00): Hi,
assuming that we receive community agreement, how we can revert your revert procedure?

These are all high precised data, we studied for so many months.
Please let me know how to resolve the problem rather than reverting?
pnorman_mechanical (2016-02-03 02:40:14+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 36939163, 36940905, 36942733, 36943764, 36944498, 36946223.
pnorman (2016-02-03 02:54:09+00:00): Other people have deleted some of your original problem import, so reverting this isn't a route you want to go. Instead, you should do a new import in compliance with the import guidelines.
Mojgan Jadidi (2016-02-04 15:25:13+00:00): Ok, I got it, I don't have any issues for doing import again, I started an extensive discussion in both talk-ca and imports@ groups. We prepared our wiki page as import guideline...any other action required?
GerdP (2016-02-03 05:32:41+00:00): Hi there!
I see that you combine area:highway=*
with highway=* and area=yes, e.g. here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394332149
I see  two problems here:
1) highway=bicycle_road is only used here
2) the combination seems to be redundant, and area:highway=* is far more often used 
What additinal information do you want to 
map with this change?
SomeoneElse (2016-02-02 20:20:28+00:00): Er - do you really think that there is still an active "phones4u" shop in the Strand?  It seems unlikely - see http://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/dec/23/phones4u-hundreds-stores-are-empty-a-year-after-collapse .

Although as the above article points out a fair few of them were on long leases and are still branded, it'll need a proper on-the-ground survey to find out which.  If you haven't done that I'd suggest leaving a note that than editing problematical data.
GinaroZ (2016-02-02 20:39:41+00:00): These edits were to bring all of the mobile phone shops into line using shop=mobile_phone. In this case phones4u was using cell_phone, many other were using phone(s), electronics, telecomms, etc.

As you say without a survey is required (although street view shows it's now an EE shop). But at least now all shops have the correct tag, making it easier to find the shops via overpass turbo. :)

There are other shops that need to be checked - like Orange/T-Mobile -> EE, which I was going to bring up on talk-gb.
SomeoneElse (2016-02-02 20:53:41+00:00): Well we can't use Google Streetview; obviously :)

The danger with updating data without checking it for validity is that it'll look more recently updated than it actually is.  I would be very surprised if anyone would object to a mechanical edit of cell_phone to mobile_phone, but it's just common courtesy to let people know that you're going to do it, so that they can change any processes that consume OSM data.  You also need to sanity check all the data that you're changing, so that any obviously invalid data can be found.  There's a wider discussion of this sort of issue at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What's_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F .
Andrea Musuruane (2016-02-03 11:37:21+00:00): Ma non si chiama "Ristorante della Serra"? Ha cambiato nome?
naoliv (2016-02-02 15:15:15+00:00): Não apague os nós dos bairros...
freeExec (2016-02-03 08:15:41+00:00): Опять рисуем по яндексу, а прикрываемся Мапбоксом?
Anto110 (2016-02-03 10:39:53+00:00): Мы к сожалению уже знаем как вы делаете правки по MapBox.
Недавний пример, когда вы искривили подъездные дороги к высоткам на Пушкаревском кольце, не зная в реальности, как там на самом деле идут дороги.
freeExec (2016-02-03 11:54:08+00:00): Мы ..., ну ок.
Как раз я и не скрываю, что нарисовал по Мапбоксу. Ты рисуешь то, что там не видно. А значит используешь другой источник и не указываешь его. Например тот же яндекс, который нельзя брать, а следовательно всё по нему обрисованное должно быть удалено.
Anto110 (2016-02-03 16:21:48+00:00): Я там каждый день пробежки совершаю, для того что бы внести правки по памяти и яндекс не нужен.
naoliv (2016-02-02 15:15:12+00:00): Não apague os nós dos bairros...
m902 (2016-02-02 17:37:39+00:00): I see you have added Dr John Garang International School as "building=kindergarten". I think this should be "amenity=kindergarten" since it encloses a number of buildings. Could you look at it again please?
Anne Leschallier de Lisle (2016-02-03 17:18:40+00:00): Yes that was voluntary. Thanks, but maybe you can add this as an amenity too?
m902 (2016-02-03 20:43:56+00:00): Changed building=kindergarten to amenity=kindergarten. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten
eggie (2023-05-17 07:02:36+00:00): Dag M&M  Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zi ik.. Bij deze alsnog..
Wellicht heb je wat aan de tips.

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Kalagea (2016-04-27 20:00:29+00:00): Actualización y corrección: la vía ya no existe y llevaba al Río Magdalena.
Kalagea (2016-04-27 20:01:22+00:00): Actualización y corrección: la vía ya no existe y llevaba al Río Magdalena.
maraf24 (2016-02-05 17:01:21+00:00): Odtworzone adresy.
bigbug21 (2016-09-09 08:06:07+00:00): Danke für die Ergänzungen! Im Laufe des Nachmittags gehen für den neuen Bahnhof Breitengüßbach und den weiteren Streckenverlauf bis zum Tunnel Eierberge eine Reihe weiterer Ergänzungen online.
maraf24 (2016-02-05 17:00:00+00:00): Odtworzyłem skasowaną postać adresów.
R0bst3r (2016-02-02 16:40:17+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM, sieht schon sehr gut aus. Ein kleiner Tipp noch: Wenn man ein Gebäude ausgewählt hat und die Taste "S" drückt, werden die Gebäude rechtwinklig.

Viel Erfolg!
5m4u9 (2016-02-02 16:16:55+00:00): no es necesario mencionar que es sin nombre en el nombre... dejar en blanco.
GerdP (2016-02-03 05:13:42+00:00): Hi there!
I see that you sometimes use highway=yes instead of highway=road. I think highway=yes should no longer be used. Do you have a good reason for that?
Tamas54_hu (2016-02-03 06:27:31+00:00): Hi!
I think I made this mistake.
I think I have copyed this tracks by the process: copy of roads from turistautak.hu.
The upload process of OSM did not see this mistakes.
How can I see this routes with mistakes?
GerdP (2016-02-03 06:33:52+00:00): You can use the new "download from overpass api" in JOSM. The query would be type:way and highway=yes . 
You can also use this link:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/e9y
Tamas54_hu (2016-02-03 06:50:43+00:00): Thanks You for help!
I need to learn a lot! :)
Sorry, I don't find this  "download from overpass api" in JOSM 9329! Where is this? In wich menu?
Also, if I click on the http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/e9y link, I don't see any result!
GerdP (2016-02-03 06:59:20+00:00): Oh, sorry, I think in JOSM you have to enable the expert mode to use that api.
You probably should not do that as a beginner.
Reg. the link: You should see a button like "Execute" or "Ausführen" in the upper left corner, press it and then use the buttons to zoom on the data.
 In case that doesn't work here are the links to the two ways:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395601572
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395051348
Tamas54_hu (2016-02-03 07:11:49+00:00): Thanks, I have repaired the mistakes of this links:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395601572 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395051348
Are there also mistakes in the column Ways (8) and Nodes (55) ?
GerdP (2016-02-03 07:20:29+00:00): I don't know, because I am not a local and Bing doesn't show any details in this area. Just keep on mapping and see what happens with your data. Happy mapping!
Tamas54_hu (2016-02-03 07:23:19+00:00): Thank You for help again 

By
Martin Borsje (2016-02-02 19:15:05+00:00): Beste,

Je hebt de windmolen biet goed getagd.

KIjk op http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:man_made%3Dwindmill

Daar staat het goed. Lukt het niet: laat het dan even weten.

Groet
jinalfoflia (2016-02-08 07:30:21+00:00): @Danaja You should not be using Google as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Also there is some excellent documentation about OSM here - http://learnosm.org/
Nakaner (2016-02-09 22:45:11+00:00): Es ist im Bahnbereich in OSM üblich, dass wir die Unternehmensform mit taggen, also operator="DB Station&Service AG" statt operator="DB Station&Service". Machst du das bitte wieder rückgängig oder soll ich es tun?
hans-mueller (2016-02-11 14:07:13+00:00): Das widerspricht der allgemeinen operator OSM-Konvention, siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:operator. Ich würde vorschlagen, wir passen den Bahnbereich entsprechend der OSM-Konvention an, sodass es durchgehend "DB Station&Service" ist. Ich sehe hier keine ausreichende Begründung, warum das im Bahnbereich anders sein sollte. Bei network tagge ich im Bahnbereich ja auch nicht "Hamburger Verkehrsverbund GmbH". Das macht auch kein Mensch. Mein Vorschlag: Wir dokumentieren im Wiki, dass operator immer mit "DB Station&Service" zu taggen ist und ändern alle "DB Station&Service AG" möglichst per Skript oder ähnlich automatisch auf "DB Station&Service" um. Einverstanden?
tunnelbauer (2016-02-02 17:41:25+00:00): Why did you delete this boundary way?
laznik (2016-02-02 17:55:48+00:00): two reasons - 

I created it today from a rectified image, but after I was contacted by another mapper who told me that the polygon is not accurate I deleted it - for these reasons:

1. I was not able to rectify the source image I used to create the polygon to match the map,

2. I found in the niederosterreich region a polygonn that matched a part of the polygon that I created. Therefore I assume there could be polygons also for the remaining alps regions and I did not want to create a duplicate.
DaveF (2016-02-03 16:06:24+00:00): What was the mistake?
Why have you deleted the religion tag?
freeExec (2016-02-03 09:45:05+00:00): Что-то границы идут по полям, что невозможно.
Mikhail Kalenkov (2016-02-03 20:40:41+00:00): а какое именно место? Я генпланы обводил

http://mapwarper.net/maps/12371#Preview_Map_tab
http://mapwarper.net/maps/12375#Preview_Map_tab
freeExec (2016-02-04 09:20:00+00:00): Генпланы не настолько точны, чтобы их обводить не глядя на местность.
В текстовых вариантах обычно идёт что-то типа по "северной стороне лесополосы"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/53.8302/49.2984
http://openstreetmap.org/#map=14/53.776/49.4344
Тут же видно, что граница должна идти по руслу реки http://openstreetmap.org/#map=15/53.8601/49.4312
Mikhail Kalenkov (2016-02-04 10:55:29+00:00): Там лесополосы. Помедитировал над картой росреестра и описанием границ кадастровых округов.

Провел границу вдоль лесополос. А про границу по руслу реки сказано было явно в описании. Провел по реке.
PT-53 (2021-02-14 08:26:13+00:00): Hallo  q_un_go,
Du hast diese Fläche
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395459591#map=18/48.36396/7.87975
eingezeichnet und mit natural=grassland
versehen, dieses Merkmal aber in diesem CS wieder gelöscht.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Harry Cutts (2016-10-02 21:51:51+00:00): Just to let you know, I removed your outlines of buildings just east of the Kannon Do Zen Meditation Center on Rock Street, as they've been demolished since the Bing imagery was taken. This was described by the FIXMEs on Reflection Way and the new house numbers; please check them before drawing over them in future :-).
ediyes (2016-10-05 12:54:47+00:00): Hi there!

Thanks so much for updating the data.

Edith.