piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
DeFra85 (2022-10-03 13:12:32+00:00): Ich hoffe meine Ergänzungen (Foto vom Logo, Farbe, Länge, Aufstieg, Abstieg, etc.) haben nichts zerschossen. Ansonsten lösch meine Änderung!!!

Die verschiedenen Logos der Wege sind ja auch auf den Wegweisern, nur halt ohne Name. Wollen wir dafür eine Routennummer/ref= vergeben?
Ich würde folgendes für die Wege in Steinhagen vorschlagen

Bergweltenweg = BWB
(Für den Kirchdornberger Bergmannsweg gibt es ja das "Schlägel & Eisen" Symbol)
Leberblümchenweg = LBW
Schierenweg = SW
Quellweg = QW
Patthorster Hexenpatt = PHP

Ich werde auch bei Herrn Rudek im Steinhagener Rathaus nachfragen wegen den Alten Wanderwegen A1-7 bzw. sogar bis 16 (Obersteinhagen, Patthorst). Wobei hier im Teuto einige doppelt vorkommen wegen der Überschneidung zu Bielefeld.
Aber im Zuge des Projekts ZukunftsFitWandern wurde die eigentlich alle Umbenannt (siehe A3 -> Leberblümchenweg) oder zusammengefasst/gekürzt (Steinhagen A1 -> Schierenweg; Kirchdornberg  A1&2 -> Bergmannsweg) und auch vieles platt gemacht, weil's einfach zu viel war. Ich habe bei meinen Wanderungen hier auch keine alten Wegemarkierungen wahrgenommen. Auf den Wegweisern war auch nur <2>, <4> und <10> .

Was denkst du?
Muhmaker (2022-10-03 16:53:11+00:00): Also die Wege in der Relation sind noch sortiert. Ich habe aber ein paar Anmerkungen. Mit dem Verlinken des Logo wäre ich vielleicht etwas vorsichtiger wegen potentiellen Urheberrechts-Problemen. Kenne mich aber im Detail nicht aus was erlaubt ist und was nicht. Die Werte für Aufstieg und Abstieg sollten natürlich idealerweise selber gemessen sein und nicht aus anderen Quellen übernommen werden. Und der Eintrag für source ist exakt der gleiche wie für website. Source halte ich auch eher für überflüssig. Die Idee mit den ref-Werten finde ich sehr gut. Die komischen Abkürzungen, die auf waymarked hiking auftauchen sind hässlich. Als ich die Wege abgewandert bin habe ich leider nicht auf die A-Markierungen geachtet. Mir war nicht klar dass es dort so ein dichtes Netz gibt/gab. Den Patthorster Hexenpatt und den Quellweg bin ich bisher noch nicht gelaufen. Wenn es soweit ist, schaue ich auch mal nach den alten Markierugen. Ich werde das aber nicht systematisch für alle A-Wege machen können. Die alten Markierungen waren meistens mit weißer Farbe auf Baumstämme aufgemalt und werden natürlich im Laufe der Zeit immer schlechter sichtbar oder wurden gar abgeholzt.
Muhmaker (2022-10-04 06:42:44+00:00): Mir ist noch eine Alternative zu den verlinkten Bildern eingefallen. Du könntest selber ein Foto der Routen-Logos machen und bei https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page hochladen. Dort kannst du dann als Ersteller des Bildes die Rechte für alle freigeben und von OSM aus darauf verlinken. Bei den Stolpersteinen in Bielefeld haben ich und andere das so gemacht. Das geht dann direkt mit image=File:"DeinDateiname"
Muhmaker (2022-10-06 09:02:42+00:00): Habe den Hexenpatt aufgezeichnet und eingetragen. Dort keine Markierungen mehr von A11 und A12 gesehen. Bin aber nur auf dem Hexenpatt unterwegs gewesen.
DeFra85 (2022-10-06 13:09:12+00:00): @Hexenpatt: super
Den Quellweg bin ich auf meinen Wegweiser-Touren quasi auch abgefahren, nur in zwei Etappen und habe ihn auch schon eingetragen.

Als source habe ich jetzt survey genommen, da wir sie ja abgehen.

Im Teuto wurden die alten Strecken ja entweder nur umbenannt oder zusammengefasst, da wurden die alten Markierungen mit den neuen überklebt.
In der Patthorst wurde auch so einiges weggeschlagen

Gute Idee mit den Logos.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Larmax (2022-10-02 08:26:54+00:00): Moi, name-tägissä kuuluu olla nimi vain yhdellä kielellä
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Anton Khorev (2022-10-03 14:25:19+00:00): Are those nodes building entrances?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10068124560  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10068124559  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10068124558

If yes, there's an easier way for you to enter them without setting incorrect tags.

What you did here is you added them using Every Door and after that you updated them with Vespucci. And you still kept the incorrect building tags.

What you could do instead is to enter them correctly right away with just Vespucci. Here's how you can do it:

1. Press the green "+" button.
2. Select "Add node" (NOT "Add tagged node", that one won't fully work).
3. Tap the place in the building contour where the entrance is. After that you'll have a new node created, selected and inserted in the contour.
4. Press the address button - the one with boxed "42" icon. This opens the properties dialog. Properties `addr:street` and `entrance` will be set.
5. If `addr:street` was guessed correctly by Vespucci you only have to enter the house number (`addr:housenumber`) and save the result.
PasqualeD (2022-10-03 14:29:49+00:00): Sure, sure!! If you want you can edit yourself! Thanks for reporting, I will be more careful.
Anton Khorev (2022-10-06 01:39:43+00:00): How about you edit them and change them to entrances yourself? Because if you do, you'll know how to enter them correctly instead of telling others to fix them.

Open this place with Vespucci. If you see a "house" icon where the entrance should be, you entered it wrong. Remove the `building` tag and add `entrance=yes`, then you'll see a "door" icon.

Those your edits still add "houses":  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126985634  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126985666  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126985671
ivanbranco (2022-10-06 15:38:13+00:00): After four hours since the last comment, a new changeset with a building node was uploaded: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10079188006 (he even uploaded a NEW changeset AFTER it duplicating tags such as building:levels on the node instead of deleting the building tag)

If I didn't clean-up half of the building tags two weeks ago, now there would be more building nodes in the city of Matera (387,4 km²) than in the Lombardy region (23.844 km²).

This user has been warned about this problem:
1. changeset/125725641 (with an english explanation to properly use EveryDoor)
2. changeset/126223614 (with an english and italian translation explanation to properly use EveryDoor)
3. changeset/126837986 (again with english-italian procedure and asking him if he had any problems following the procedure and suggesting him other editors)
4. here again

He doesn't reply or replies "yeah yeah thanks" without EVER fixing his mistakes. When he was blocked he even created a new account (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/OsmPd2022/) after some hours to avoid the block. The mapping is low quality, in the area of this changeset ONLY there are:
1. a building node with the addr:street as the addr:unit
2. a footway mapped twice with overlapped ways
3. a dragged way (w1073787773)
4. a way without tags (w1073787774)
5. a parking with descriptive name and upcase values (n9981772474)
6. a building that doesn't exist (w243129118)
and many more, all this in ONLY a 80 meters radius (!).

I would expect a better quality from a mapper with almost 5000 edits, expecially when other users let him know about his mistakes. Replying "thanks" and going on with more errors isn't a collaborative behaviour for OSM in my humble opinion.
PasqualeD (2022-10-06 15:53:04+00:00): Si si ok! Scusate vado di corsa a presto
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mozilz (2022-10-06 15:19:06+00:00): Hi! 
The previous Aganan flyover geometry was correct, the flyover is meant to split in to two one way roads that will run parallel on both sides of the existing Aganan bridge.
relaemanila (2022-10-09 13:38:05+00:00): Sorry about that. I will fix it now.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:45:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-10-09 18:57:09+00:00): reverted by changeset #127263492 due deleting BAG addres
eggie (2022-10-09 18:59:43+00:00): Please don't delete the addressnodes
Greetz,
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Polarbear (2022-10-29 20:21:56+00:00): Bitte sei so nett und gib eine sinnvolle Quelle für deine Geometrien an. 
 
Das Objekt is z.B. gut zu sehen auf:
Berlin/Geoportal DOP20RGBI (2021)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
osmviborg (2022-10-02 09:08:28+00:00): Er der ikke mere en port til baggården, en port med en vej igennem?
Søren Kristensen (2022-10-02 13:24:39+00:00): Der er adgang for gående til baghuset, men det er ikke en offentlig vej længere. Vejen der er på OpenStreetMap er del af en gammel vej der blev brugt til at bringe kul ind til baghusene på Falstersgade før der kom centralvarme, vejen har ikke eksisteret i en menneskealder
osmviborg (2022-10-02 13:40:52+00:00): Så en gangsti. Det samme gør sig gældende for nr. 33A & 33C, en port med en gangsti, til baghusene.