piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 19:09:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69672250 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 17:38:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69670073 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 19:09:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69672250 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-11 12:18:18+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4849889#map=15/53.00729/-1.51240 ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 19:09:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69672250 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 17:38:43+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69669198, 69669203, 69669204, 69669207, 69669245, 69669255, 69669988, 69670002, 69670005, 69670012, 69670016, 69670030, 69670045, 69670048, 69670052, 69670063, 69670068.
aseerel4c26 (2019-04-28 20:34:19+00:00): Revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69674507 .

Kommunizieren gilt auch für dich bzw. diesen Account. Bitte beachte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .

Schon ein Zufall, dass der Edit teilweise die gleichen Objekte bearbeitete wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69669987 . Viele Grüße nach Alberta!
aseerel4c26 (2019-04-29 20:20:58+00:00): Siehe für die folgende Diskussion den Revert-CS: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69674507
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-06 19:25:54+00:00): Kein Zufall. DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
rskedgell (2024-05-08 09:24:53+00:00): I can't find this order online, but it seems odd that a 20mph speed limit order should introduce both an absolute 7.5t weight limit and an HGV ban. Do you have a link to the original traffic order?
santamariense (2019-04-29 03:47:11+00:00): Maneire nas tuas exclusões. Nitidamente você está excluindo objetos indevidamente. Sugiro fortemente que enquanto vai pegando a prática, procure apenas criar novos objetos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69670799
viloan (2019-04-28 18:12:48+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Sosha1996 (2019-05-02 17:05:28+00:00): نقاطی رو که حذف کردید، شامل چه چیزاییهه؟
Skippern (2019-05-19 18:16:39+00:00): natural=wood deve ser mapeado Como um area, nao como um nó
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69671276
ofc (2019-04-28 18:40:15+00:00): Een paar nodes van het fietspad zaten om mij onbekende reden vast aan de landuse. Die heb ik met unglue ontkoppeld waarna ik ze kon verplaatsen.
Skippern (2019-05-19 18:15:27+00:00): tem duvida sobre esse caminho, talvez relação e jeito mais certo p mapear isso?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69671539
user_8466505 (2020-09-05 19:21:24+00:00): Hey there! Are you planning on finishing the golf course?

Thanks,
TheAdventurer64
eggie (2019-04-30 07:34:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-04-30 07:39:41+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Je paden eindigen geplakt aan de landuse en niet aan een andere weg. het zal daardoor niet routeren.
Ook zitten er paden geplakt aan de grens met naamaanduiding kamperzand
Dit waren je edits.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69671743
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2019-05-01 07:03:34+00:00): Hallo! Können wir den Schlüssel "existiert überhaupt?"="2" in "fixme"="existiert überhaupt?" ändern? Das erleichtert erheblich die Auswertung.
Makake77 (2019-05-01 07:40:29+00:00): Ja, bitte um Entschuldigung. Das ist wohl eher ein "copy paste" Fehler aus meinen Kommentaren für Punkte/Wege in Basecamp, der sich hier eingeschlichten hat. Außerdem müssten die Relationen der Radrouten in diesem Bereich mal gecheckt werden. Durch den Bau des Deichkronen-Radwegs (den ich zumindest vom Verlauf her nun eingepflegt hatte) hat sich einiges geändert, was die Zugänge und den Verlauf des Netzes angeht. Schönen ersten Mai wünsche ich
Makake77 (2019-05-01 07:42:57+00:00): um welchen Weg handelt es sich da? es kann sein, dass der ursprüngliche Schlüssel den tag "class:bicycle:mtb" hatte, da ich manchen trails diesen per copy/paste aus der openstreetmap tag liste hinzugefügt hatte. Vielleicht hilft das auch bei der Auswertung
user_5359 (2019-05-01 08:19:00+00:00): Hallo Makake77, kennst das Overpass Turbo Webseite: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/IvI ?
viloan (2019-04-28 19:01:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-04-30 08:44:15+00:00): Hier heb ik wat hersteld, want de gebouwen waren nu losse multipolygonen. Je had dus de delen van het gebouw gesplitst. 
Dat rendert wel, maar is niet correct. Luchtfoto's vertekenen. 
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 19:09:56+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69669198, 69669203, 69669204, 69669207, 69669245, 69669255, 69669988, 69670002, 69670005, 69670012, 69670016, 69670030, 69670045, 69670048, 69670052, 69670063, 69670068, 69670076, 69670461, 69670494, 69670517, 69670530.
Vinber (2019-05-01 15:57:53+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour cette contribution. Comment avez vous tracé ce bâtiment ?
Bonne journée
viloan (2019-04-28 19:09:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
lostmike (2019-04-29 09:28:43+00:00): Can you tell us what the original research was?  I've never heard it called West Williamson.
lostmike (2019-04-29 09:54:32+00:00): It also seems redundant when cy:name and en:name are the same as name.
likeaword (2019-04-29 10:26:00+00:00): Sorry. That was a typo. Thanks for spotting. I have corrected.

I sort of agree about the redundancy. The logic (such as it is) is:

The name tag typically contains the name used locally. This can be the name used in Welsh or English and it is not possible to tell the difference. Adding name:en and name:cy makes this unambiguous. Though in the short term it is the name:cy that we are interested in for openstreetmap.cymru we anticipate a demand for a bilingual map.

In the medium term I think it might be more satisfactory to handle these issues in Wikidata rather than OSM. That would allow for even greater layers of complexity (like where the official source for the name in Welsh differs to the name used locally eg Hay on Wye where the Welsh Language Commissioner says the name should be Y Gelli Gandryll but it is generally called just Y Gelli locally.

There are a lot of settlements in Wales where there is no name:cy tag. Most of these appear to have the Welsh name in the name tag. But not all. For caution we are currently not using these names on openstreetmap.cymru. I’ve been trying to work through the place names that lack name:cy and where the value in the name tag appears to be in English. If we can add name:cy tags to each of those we could start to render the values in the name tag with more confidence (though we’d still like to confirm the correct name to use in Welsh and English.

I’m still finding my way through these issues so I’m very happy for guidance or discussion...
lostmike (2019-04-29 11:10:31+00:00): Glad to help

South Pembs is especially complicated as the original names would be English or derived from Norse or Flemish.  I don't like the idea of making up Welsh names for places that have never had them.
likeaword (2019-04-29 11:26:22+00:00): Ah yes. The Landsker. I agree about not inventing names. At least as far as OSM data goes. The Welsh Language Commissioner also seems to agree.
SK53 (2019-04-29 13:45:05+00:00): In general I think we should use the most widely used local name, i.e., Y Gelli and perhaps use official_name:cy or alt_name:cy for formal names which don't have widespread usage. (At least we can avoid what the French OSMers have done in Breton-speaking areas and insist on the official French name for communes & hamlets which are signed locally in Breton).
jaap de vries (2019-04-29 08:10:40+00:00): Ik zag hier een opmerking van je staan.
Deze had je aangepast en heb ik weer hersteld.
Normaliter geven we gebouwen geen adressen mee, dat doen we met een losse tag (wit bolletje op de kaart).
Ik stuur je de regels  mee hoe we op osm te werk gaan. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM 
Vragen kan je stellen op het forum
gscholz (2019-06-23 07:07:08+00:00): Hi NikAlminoJokke,
this changeset has created several errors in the osm database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-68.37600&lat=0.68502&zoom=8

Can you please fix this?
Guido
SomeoneElse (2019-05-04 10:17:45+00:00): Hello,
Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402227987/history actually exist, and does it exist already?  Many of the pubs and bars that were added in the changeset that added this one were actually duplicates.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-05-04 10:23:02+00:00): Another one is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6402227988/history .
vasony (2019-05-04 15:34:22+00:00): it this this changeset i did not add any pubs or bars, only corrected the city/zip/street base on post's database.
probably you can ask the original author
SomeoneElse (2019-05-04 15:43:37+00:00): I've already asked them and they didn't reply.  If you're sure these actually exist (and aren't duplicates) I'll leave them; otherwise I'll delete them.
vasony (2019-05-04 18:44:11+00:00): I don't know anything about those, feel free to delete them if they are really duplicates or merge them if there are new information in these such as addresses.
user_5359 (2020-01-01 09:41:45+00:00): Hello! Short question to the way https://www.osm.org/way/686477681 : What is the meaning of value=0?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 19:37:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69673091 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 20:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69673824 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 19:37:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69673091 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 20:08:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69673824 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 19:37:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69673091 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 20:08:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69673824 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 19:37:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69673091 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
dieterdreist (2019-05-16 09:38:32+00:00): Mi sembra qualcosa sia andato male con questo changeset, ci sono stato molte più cancellazioni che creazioni, per esempio sono stati cancellati questa foresta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386948865, il fiume arno: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23584997 e questo track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239862624
Anche nel caso ci sia un oggetto con mancanti tag (landuse=orchard) come https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386948859 sarebbe stato meglio aggiungere il tag che cancellare la geometria.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69672877
ravanator (2019-05-16 16:20:45+00:00): Sto effettuando lentamente le modifiche, con questa procedura:
1. elimino le aree estese e non rispondenti alla reale copertura esistente, perchè ignorano molte aree coltivate ed insediamenti
2. disegno con attenzione la rete idrografica, basandomi sui dati regionali e le immagini sat e ortofoto
3. disegno le case sparse e curo i toponimi, usando anche i catasti storici
4. verifico le strade e aggiungo sentieri, anche usando i dati catastali (attuali e stroci)
5. per ultima cosa ricreo le aree boschive e i coltivi, con maggior dettaglio, usando le foto sat.
Opero molto lentamente, con lugnhe pause, ma miro ad una mappa più precisa.
Quello che sto facendo anche per la zona poco più a Nord: Sieci, Monteloro, Molino del Piano, ecc.
Ti ringrazio comunque per l'attenzione e per le correzioni che vorrai aggiungere. Tieni però presente che foreste e boschi sono l'ultima cosa da aggiungere, a mio parere, e che certamente sistemerò. Ci vuole pazienza, d'altronde siamo volontari.
Ciao
dieterdreist (2019-05-20 10:13:22+00:00): Ciao e grazie della risposta. Va benissimo di lavorare al tempo tuo, non c'è fretta. La cancellazione del fiume Arno mi sembra comunque sbagliato. Ho ripristinato l'Arno e ti chiederei di stare molto attento con le cancellazioni. Invece il track cancellato qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239862624 non l'ho ancora ripristinato, ma mi sembra strano anch questa di cancellazione. Ti ricordi perché l'hai rimosso?
Ciao,
Martin
ravanator (2019-05-20 17:36:03+00:00): Non riesco a vedere di cosa si tratta (in effetti non ne sono capace). E' stato forse un errore, che ti pregherei di correggere. Ho cominciato a mappare in OSM da solo, senza alcun aiuto, e quindi la mia formazione è molto lacunosa. Ho invece una certa esperienza nella cartografia: ho edito alcune mappe escursionistiche.
Il problema nasce dal fatto che nelle aree di cui mi occupo, e che conosco molto bene, in OSM sono state disegnate molte aree in modo approssimativo, ed è molto difficile inserire i tracciati corretti senza prima ripulire un po'. In questo caso, nel tentativo di eliminare delle aree boschive inesatte e molto estese, devo aver rimosso anche elementi diversi.
In ogni caso è effettivamente molto faticoso intervenire su zone già "lavorate".
Spero che apprezzerai comunque lo sforzo che sto facendo per dare alla mappa una migliore omogeinità nella rappresentazione del reale uso del suolo, a partire dall'idrografia che aiuta a visualizzare l'andamento dell'orografia.
Uso un grande schermo e una tavoletta grafica, e cerco la migliore precisione.
Molti sentieri li percorro personalmente col mio gps62map.
Ti ringrazio della pazienza ma, sai, sono anche un po' vecchio!
Ciao
Mario
dieterdreist (2019-05-26 10:13:28+00:00): grazie di nuovo per la risposta. Gli oggetti cancellati non si vedono sul sito di OSM, perché non hanno più coordinate associate nella versione attuale, ma ci sono dei servizi esterni che visualizzano i changeset. Per esempio qui puoi vedere questo changeset di cui stiamo parlando:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69672877

Conosco il problema delle aree approssimative (che questa valutazione dipende ovviamente dalla scala in quale uno le guarda, ma sono d'accordo che la scala dei dati grezzi di OSM ultimamente è la scala da vicino/dettagliata), e anche le difficoltà di lavorare in zone dove già ci sono dati preesistenti. Comunque, quest'ultimo è l'idea di OSM, di lavorare insieme ad un dataset comune. Perciò si dovrebbe sempre tentare di preservare il più possibile e di modificare piùttosto che di eliminare e rifare. Questo perché ci sono tantissimi fatti e dettagli già codificati negli dati, e rifacendo (come la storia ci ha dimostrato infinite volte) si tende a dimenticare o non vedere questi dettagli e informazioni.

Per le foreste, se ti posso dare un consiglio, il modo più sostenibile a lungo termine è quello di fare "pezzi piccoli", e di usare qualsiasi occasione (come per esempio una strada) per spezzare una foresta in due. Anche per i landuse (utilizzo del suolo), più piccoli che ci sono, meglio è (per future modifiche, e per evitare future modifiche errate, e per semplificare la struttura in generale= più comprensibile).

Per ricreare qualcosa cancellato, in JOSM c'è una funzione, dove bisogna inserire l'id dell'oggetto (in "File"-> "undelete Object"), il formato dell'ID è "n" per nodo, "w" per way e "r" per relazione, seguito dall'id, per esempio "w123" per il way 123.
Ciao,
Martin
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 20:08:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69673824 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 20:08:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69673824 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 20:08:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69673824 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
eggie (2019-04-30 08:05:10+00:00): info verplaatst naar adresnode
eggie (2019-04-30 08:10:55+00:00): man_made =pier hoort in het water. Is dat hier?
eggie (2019-04-30 08:15:51+00:00): Oke. er is water.. Dat zou je kunnen intekenen als waterway=stream op een lijn.
eggie (2019-04-30 09:26:26+00:00): Aaahh Dit is een lastig stukje. dat bos aanpassennen .. het bosloze stuk is denk ik een retentie -bekken. Ik heb wat aangepast aan de landuse.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-30 09:26:47+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:basin
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 19:37:11+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69672762, 69672871, 69672874, 69672875, 69672880, 69672883, 69672888, 69672893, 69672898, 69672901, 69672906, 69672913.
Jeff_9891 (2019-04-28 20:05:04+00:00): Suppression par erreur, je tente d'annuler le changeset
eggie (2019-04-30 08:07:21+00:00): Oke..De naam van de school kun je nog toevoegen.
eggie (2019-04-30 08:02:36+00:00): Ook hier geldt.. lees je goed in. 
shop hairdresser hoort op de adresnode niet op het gebouw zelf.
Gebouwen worden verder geimporteerd en niet zelf ingetekend. Dat kan via een verzoek op het forum. Zie welkomstmail
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-28 20:08:16+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69672762, 69672871, 69672874, 69672875, 69672880, 69672883, 69672888, 69672893, 69672898, 69672901, 69672906, 69672913, 69673235, 69673254, 69673293, 69673295, 69673300, 69673307, 69673309, 69673313, 69673316, 69673319, 69673320.
Frans S (2019-04-29 09:27:03+00:00): Hello Cameron Yell 
hanks for mapping on this project. I review tasks before validating them and have a remark
Please square all ! your rectangular buildings. (you missed 26 out of 104) and, when you see a dark spot alongside a building, it is mostly the shadow of a building. Please do not include that in your mapping.
Best regards and keep mapping
viloan (2019-04-28 20:17:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-04-30 07:58:36+00:00): Is het Proatplein een officiele naam. square wordt gebruikt voor bv het Rode Plein in moskou, maar niet een kruispunt in Darp. :)
Het transformaterhuisje is van z'n plek door dat je hebt geplakt en geschoven. Ik zal het losmaken en herstellen.
Frans S (2019-04-29 10:34:21+00:00): Hello.  Back again with another issue.
When you map buildings which are build rather close to each other, pleas leave a small gap between them (and square it) and do not let the nodes join. We have to disconnect them each to be able to square that building, as well as removing the leftover nodes which first connected the buildings
Best regards
user_3022894 (2019-04-28 20:27:33+00:00): ach so, die Luftbild-Source fehlte noch: Waren die neuen DigitalGlobe Premium Luftbilder.