piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2022-11-23 15:19:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129286500 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping, the trash data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6558].
VictorIE (2023-01-19 06:25:50+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48782624

This is still tagged with some Gala tags. Is this correct?
TXPeig (2023-01-27 20:08:54+00:00): Was passing the area today. It has now become an asian/indian food store.
treestryder (2023-01-16 00:33:49+00:00): Letting you know, after seeing your use of the "whitewater" key. Whereas, I once recommended its use, now "canoe" is the generic key for all human powered boats in OpenStreetMap. Have a look at the Michigan Wiki for an overview of how to map paddling infrastructure.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Common_Tagging_Schemes

These can be seen at
https://openstreetbrowser.org/#map=18/42.74232/-84.54760&categories=paddling_routes,paddling_hazards,paddling_amenities

Also, many Michigan mappers have been meeting together each month. Meeting information can be found in the Community section. Hope to see you around.
eggie (2022-07-09 19:27:14+00:00): Dag Arjan.. Svp geen paden gaan vastmaken aan de landuse. De kaart wordt volledig onwerkbaar voor anderen.
MVG
eggie
ArjanJager (2022-07-13 15:08:41+00:00): Ok, bedankt. Hoe kan ik het wel doen?
eggie (2022-07-13 15:14:43+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Editor iD plakt alles aan elkaar wat in de buurt komt. Wanneer je de linker alttoets gebruikt tijdens intekenen zal het niet plakken 
Een trucje...
Mapse
Eggie
ArjanJager (2022-07-25 18:31:07+00:00): Ok, goede truc om te weten.
Arminus (2022-07-10 10:29:42+00:00): Führt hier ein Weg hin den man ggf. noch mappen könnte? Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3259744
zEEs (2022-07-10 11:05:25+00:00): Ja, kommt noch.
AndersAndersson (2022-07-11 10:56:41+00:00): Är detta en väg för främst ridning?
Annars är nog highway=path ett bättre val.
eggie (2022-07-09 19:23:05+00:00): Hier klopt iets niet.. De paa en de brug zitten dubbel. 
Het pad heb ik uit de knoop gehaald.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123410960

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-09 19:31:34+00:00): De paa  ??> typo.. Het pad
ArjanJager (2022-07-13 15:07:10+00:00): Bedankt!
VictorIE (2022-08-15 22:10:08+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9877074150

For these, you can add these tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign
zyxzyx (2022-07-10 06:08:22+00:00): この編集は下記のway の形状に折れ曲がりとズレを加えたように見えます。

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28846681

誤差ズレ・歪みを持つ Bing 航空写真だけを信じて御編集したためでしょうか？
（これまでのところ、繰り返し同様な編集が止まず、返信もありません）
user_8655426 (2022-07-10 08:21:00+00:00): こんにちは。
以下のページに、航空画像使用時の注意点や画像あわせ方法が書かれています。参考にしてみてください。

JA:画像の利用
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:画像の利用

idエディタでの背景画像の変更
https://learnosm.org/ja/beginner/id-editor/

それから、変更セットのコメントですが、編集の内容や意図が他のユーザーに伝わるよう、もう少し詳しく書いてください。よろしくお願いします。

JA:変更セットの良いコメント
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:変更セットの良いコメント
user_5359 (2022-07-12 13:54:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1059375952. What ist the meaning of the tag e=e?
trial (2022-07-10 22:18:31+00:00): Bonjour,
- d'où vient ce nom ? Non visible sur le Cadastre, etc... Une confusion avec Pen ar Prat qui est au nord ?
- urban n'est pas adapté, ou alors des gratte-ciel ont poussé depuis la photo aérienne^^.
.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:residential=urban?uselang=fr
trial (2022-07-10 22:19:28+00:00): rural serait plus adapté https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:residential%3Drural
malffe (2022-07-11 08:38:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Le nom "Pen ar C'hoat" est le nom original de ce lieu dit , il a été francisé avec peu de sérieux en "chef de bois".
Ce lieu dit contient une cinquantaine de maison et n'est plus une zone rurale.
Cordialement
Paul
trial (2022-07-11 11:02:39+00:00): Bonjour, selon la carte, cette zone comporte 3 parties Pen ar Prat, Corn Parcou/Korn Parkoù et donc Pen ar C’hoat. Oui la traduction sent le fumage de moquette.  Je ne sais s’il y a lieu de mettre un ou 3 lieux-dits. Je sais juste qu’actuellement c’est incohérent. Je maintiens par ailleurs que rural est bon et que urban est faux. Ce sont des termes britanniques et ici on a de l’habitat de type lotissement en zone rurale, urban c’est du bâti haut style barre HLM.

Après côté Chef du Bois/Pen ar C’hoat la règle dans OSM c’est de mettre le nom dans la langue officielle et donc 
name 	Chef du Bois
name:br 	Penn ar C’hoad
comme dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1849717546 (oui il y a une tendance à écrire de manière homogène les Penn ar C’hoad). Mais vu l’horreur du « Chef du Bois » je ne m’amuserais pas à le changer, je dis juste la règle. La solution propre étant que la mairie mette des panneaux correspondant au nom original.
trial (2022-07-13 07:59:04+00:00): Bonjour, quelques points :
- la bonne géométrie est en général celle de la couche cadastre (on peut d'ailleurs l'importer avec JOSM par exemple), quiite à la décaler comme ici pour coller à la vue aérienne :
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/795923669
- addr:city et addr:postcode sont en général du bruit (c'est donné par la localisation, ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/166257)
- Q permet de mettre des angles droits
- les numéros ne sont pas associés au bâti mais placés à l'entrée du terrain
khdhzhpmaxwccappzg (2022-07-09 19:51:02+00:00): Is sidewalk=no implied? I won't make changes like this again if it is.
Amir1367 (2022-07-09 19:57:47+00:00): سلامتی شما آرزوی ماست
Allroads (2023-02-12 21:26:40+00:00): De verkeerslichten op bij de brug, worden het meeste gebruikt, continue, om de wegversmalling te regelen, ten tweede de brug, wat alleen zomers plezierjachtjes zijn.
Hier moet je veelal altijd stoppen, dus een kostenfactor voor de routing op de rijbaan. Kosten factor voor bridge kan anders zijn. Dat zou je nu als =bridge kunnen afleiden. Op de rijbaan.
emvee (2023-02-12 21:56:34+00:00): Bedankt, prima feed-back.

Ja, voor het auto-verkeer is traffic_signals=bridge niet de hoofdfunctie maar voor het fietspad wel.

Ik heb traffic_signals=bridge van de auto-verkeerslichten gehaald: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132464345
Allroads (2023-02-13 21:38:48+00:00): Vroeger was daar helemaal geen fietspad, de brug was niet gemaakt voor een fietspad, terwijl men wel de volle lengte van de sluis wilde gebruiken, maten scheepvaart, geen bredere brug, heeft men besloten de rijbaan naar 1 baan te construeren en het fietspad doorgaande een eigen baan te geven. En men had dan gelijk niet dat er twee vrachtwagens naast elkaar over de brug reden. Belastbaarheid. Zo ontstaan zaken die net even anders is.
Larmax (2022-07-11 19:46:26+00:00): Hei, miksi menet jatkuvasti sotkemaan rakennuksia? Relaatiot ovat jatkuvasti sinun  jäljiltä hajalla. + Tuossa kohtaa on selkeästi rakennusta, miksi poistit sen?
Nakaner (2025-09-10 10:37:56+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171728627

Der Fahrscheinautomat im Freiburger Hauptbahnhof hatte spätestens im Jahr 2021 bwegt-Branding bekommen. Stattdessen hast du mit diesem mechanischen Edit das falsche brand="Deutsche Bahn" ergänzt. Daher gehe ich davon aus, dass dieser Änderungssatz ein mechanischer Edit ist, der keinen Mehrwert zum Projekt beiträgt. Dieselben trivialen Modifikationen können Datenkonsumenten selbstständig auf heruntergeladene OSM-Datne anwenden.

Ich habe ihn daher, soweit die Objekte zwischenzeitlich nicht anderweitig bearbeitet worden sind, rückgängig gemacht.

Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4557487847/history

Zwecks ausführlicher Begründung sei auf osm.org/user_blocks/18387 verwiesen.
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-29 16:56:57+00:00): Hi jmarchon,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
jmarchon (2022-07-30 05:59:02+00:00): Hi,
No, I am manually tracing these land use areas from swisstopo SWISSIMAGE imagery.
Have a nice day!
jmarchon
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-30 06:31:00+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
Wow, you manually traced those landuse areas and created 20,000 nodes within 26 seconds.
jmarchon (2022-07-30 06:51:17+00:00): It took me a whole day, but because it was more than 10,000 edits (the limit of one changeset), JOSM split it up.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
user_12500175 (2022-07-12 18:46:11+00:00): Hallo,
zu der maxhigh= 2.5 gibt es ein Zusatzschild "ab Wendehammer"

Gruß
Danfost
Lejun (2022-07-19 14:44:34+00:00): Salut et merci de la contribution, je vois que tu as indiqué deux garages Hyundai (et un Audi), c’est volontaire ?
marc__marc (2022-10-08 09:38:08+00:00): Bonjour, quel est votre source ?
car la population de Digne, la ville, ne saurait etre la même que la population de sa commune qui comprend des hameaux.
Cordialement,
Marc
DUGA (2022-07-09 21:30:44+00:00): Tag upgrades + Realign
EP_Repair (2022-07-25 14:15:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124054794 where the changeset comment is: reverting changes to cities in Maryland where the population does not justify a city.
EP_Repair (2022-07-25 14:27:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124055300 where the changeset comment is: reverting changes to cities where the population does not justify a city. City should be at least 50,000k people
EP_Repair (2022-07-25 14:44:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124055929 where the changeset comment is: reverting changes to cities where the population does not justify a city. City should be at least 50,000 people
Harfeur (2022-07-10 09:29:49+00:00): Bonjour, merci de réaliser des changements séparés lorsque ceux-ci sont sur deux zones très espacés afin de faciliter la vérification.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123414306
Wulfmorn (2022-07-10 00:29:38+00:00): Så ut som du hadde litt trøbbel med skogen her, så jeg lagde et ordentlig hull for bebygget område i Grue Finnskog. Vær forsiktig med å endre på elementer som er medlemmer i "skogen". Det er lett at hele skogen går i stykker. =)
ottwiz (2022-07-09 21:36:16+00:00): I also used Bing for tracing just I forgot to include it.
philippec (2022-07-28 19:12:41+00:00): Plantencentrum Van der Auwera, Reetsesteenweg 107 (zijkant hangar -> parking)
Ik verbeter het.
ggrab (2022-08-10 22:42:15+00:00): A few things went wrong in this changeset:
- The Klettersteig is not part of Wanderweg 534.
- The guidepost at the branch-off from Wanderweg 534 lost the important tags "information=guidepost" and "tourism=information".
- The guidepost must not be part of a way, but a separate object, located correctly with respect to the ways. This location is now lost.
- Only a part of the new way is the Klettersteig, so there have to be two different ways. The Klettersteig itself shall be tagged with "highway=via_ferrata".
- The way for the Klettersteig seems like a very rough approximation, there are only a few nodes. In such a case, please add something like "fixme=check position".

I just fixed these problems, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124751283

Please be careful with future edits - thanks!
Msiipola (2022-07-10 07:22:16+00:00): Hej! Jag ser att du är ny med OSM och vill informera dig om "path". Det betyder egentligen ingenting. Path kan översättas med "spår". Om det är en gång- och cykelväg behöver det anges med taggar på "spåret". Se vidare wiki-osm:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
literan (2023-08-02 18:20:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3812978
Cucazer (2022-07-25 11:58:30+00:00): From Mapillary it looks more like access=destination (for motor vehicles) with a condition. Are you sure about total use prohibition for all?
HellMap (2022-07-25 12:13:48+00:00): You're right, I shouldn't have put access=no there. It's destination with a restriction (assuming it says delivery vehicles). There's a no entry (brick) on the East side, but no entry (circle) on West side. I didn't have Mapillary uploaded/processed yet so I got it wrong. I changed it.

I had also left a note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3238697
iWowik (2022-07-10 19:14:36+00:00): Меня терзают смутные сомнения, а не Конеўка? 
Откуда источник названий гор/холмов?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5738091239/history
tbicr (2022-07-10 21:53:52+00:00): Так тут памылка, мусіць быць Конеўка. Выкарыстоўваецца name як крыніца, для не тапонімаў звычайны пераклад, для тапонімаў калі ёсьць адзін адпаведнік пішыцца ён, калі ёсьць варыянты націску шукаецца тапонім з заданым name:* ад якога хутчэй йдзе дадзеная назва ці які даў назву, ці побач шукаюцца тапонімы з заданым name:* якія маюць падобнае словаўтварэньне.
OvenTraveller (2022-07-10 13:44:50+00:00): basketball court at remembrance park is not permanently a basketball court; deleted basketball court
b-jazz (2022-07-11 15:22:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077274315 and several other forest areas that are drawn here are oddly shaped, don't match satellite imagery and overlap with other forest areas. Was there some accidental movement of nodes? Could you take another look and make sure it represents what is on the ground? Thanks.
ovruni (2022-07-10 01:02:38+00:00): Hola, el uso de nombres es solamente para algún nombre en particular, no para una descripción como "zona inundable" [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:08:20+00:00): entiendo
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-07-21 16:21:52+00:00): Jeg tror, at du skulle bruge cycleway:right og cycleway:left på fx Vendersgade
ovruni (2022-07-10 01:07:41+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios al igual que los anteriores, sobre los cuales le he escrito anteriormente, hay múltiples cruces de vías y vías superpuestas, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:07:43+00:00): entiendo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
IknowJoseph (2022-11-18 11:03:23+00:00): Hi, I've noticed this changeset because I was looking to tidy Abingdon a little. Did you create overlapping residential areas on top of the existing residential? The new areas don't seem to have any unique tags (name, etc), so I'm not sure what this adds? For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077284302
IknowJoseph (2022-11-18 11:19:15+00:00): Just for completeness, here's the existing residential area that is now overlain by others: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12580038
ovruni (2022-07-10 01:11:41+00:00): Hola, el uso de textos como "DETALLES" no brinda suficiente información a la comunidad sobre los cambios realizados, por favor revise la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:07:00+00:00): entiendo
redd (2022-07-10 13:59:44+00:00): Danke dir! Zu einem der fehlenden Gebäude hatte ich einen Hinweis erstellt, welchen ich somit schliessen konnte: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3221514#map=19/50.01109/10.58542
MxxCon (2022-07-10 02:37:09+00:00): Hello uplander.
As you've been instructed in the past, it is inappropriate to tag the whole building as a business if that business occupies only a part of it.
As such this and your consecutive edits will be reverted.
If you continue to ignore OSM rules your account will be referred to DWG.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123417473
MxxCon (2022-07-10 03:13:55+00:00): Hello.
There are 2 issues with this edit.
First is that "name=*" tag should not be used as a description. This aspect is documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Second issue is that "amenity=food_sharing" is not an accepted OSM tag yet. According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/food_sharing this tag is still in a proposal state. As such you shouldn't use it since its syntax might change..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123417729
juliencherry (2022-07-10 04:18:49+00:00): Hi MxxCon!

I don’t believe I made any changes to the name tag (I just left it as is).

As for `amenity=food_sharing`, I replaced `food_share` with `food_sharing` because no other nodes use the former. Also, It seems okay to use a tag that is currently proposed per
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like.
MxxCon (2022-07-10 05:06:38+00:00): You are correct. You didn't change the name. I apologize for confusing that.

Yes, any tags you like, however in this case if you are trying to make this feature match others, that means you are coming up with a tagging scheme..and that kind of stuff needs the community consensus like the linked proposal.
juliencherry (2022-07-10 14:07:33+00:00): There’s more agreement for `food_sharing` than for the `food_share`, so I don’t undersand what the problem is. Do you have a suggestion for how this should have been edited differently?
eggie (2022-07-10 07:15:25+00:00): Dag earlyistimeless

Je vraagt feedback.. 
Aparte situatie.. 
Fout is het niet.. hoewel erg schematisch getekend.
Voor de routering heeft het weinig zin, want de tuinpaden staan op access=private.
Meestal worden paden in tuinen niet ingetekend. Ook stelt niet iedereen het op prijs. Het geeft nog wel eens problemen. 
Zelf ben ik behouden in het intekenen van looproutes in privétuinen. 
Brandgangen worden vaak op access=private gezet .. ook om ongewenst routeren te voorkomen. 
De brandgangen horen meestal kadastraal bij de woning. Vreemde snoeshanen hebben er niets te maken. 
Niemand wil graag op een fietstocht via brandgangen worden gestuurd. 
Wanneer het een doorgaande route is kan het natuurlijk wel.  Aan deze zijde zitten natuurlijk ook de voordeuren. In de BGT komt de steeg niet voor en heeft dus ook geen naam. 
Kortom lastig hier.. 
Up to you!
eggie
eggie (2022-07-10 07:23:20+00:00): By the way... Ik heb hier de 'Parkeerterreinen' van een voorgaande mapper (het zijn geen parkeerterreinen)  omgezet naar parkeervakken. Dat levert minder prominente P's op. Even als voorbeeldmogelijkheid.
Vergelijk maar eens waar dat nog niet is aangepast.
earlyistimeless (2022-07-10 23:10:43+00:00): Bedankt voor de feedback! Het is inderdaad een erg vreemde situatie. Vandaar dat ik het ook nodig vond om te tekenen. Toen ik er voor de eerste keer moest bezorgen was het ook een erg vreemde ervaring, om de schuttingdeur van iemand te moeten openen om bij de voordeur te komen. Ik heb had twijfel het toe te voegen gezien het zo niche is en het voor de bewoners mogelijk ongewenst is, maar het is de situatie zoals het is.
JJIglesias (2022-07-10 03:35:09+00:00): Gracias por añadir la Plaza del Benemerito. Como ya existe un AREA para definir esa zona te sugerimo no crear un NODO, sino ponerle el Nombre Directamente al Area si no esta asi identificada, asi evitamos Duplicaciones innecesarias.

Un detalle adicional es que si es una PLAZA, usualmente se agrega tambien la Etiqueta Place=square.

Saludos

JJ
danieldegroot2 (2022-07-10 21:08:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9878239217
Name is the name only, so don't add the name "guidepost" on a guidepost, please (unless that is its actual -signed- name)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
danieldegroot2 (2022-07-10 21:15:24+00:00): I have sent you a private welcome message with useful information :)

I unfortunately can't give feedback on all your contributions. At a glance the Fremantle ones look ok.
tastrax (2022-07-20 01:45:07+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
MaiaWilliams (2022-07-20 01:52:44+00:00): Oh cool - I'll remember to add the full international number now. Thanks for fixing that!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:20:41+00:00): No use el mapa para marcas personales, solo información de relevancia pública.
wildcatz$ (2022-07-10 23:50:45+00:00): i am not an uplander and as a mapper, we always try to hhelp eachother to correct any eorror that is or was made on OSM. thank you for the help.
Allison P (2022-07-10 07:36:23+00:00): Please make sure to format phone numbers properly, i.e., +country code area code hyphen exchange hyphen number. +1 310-358-0584, not 3103580584. I changed club=yes to club=freemasonry.
JJIglesias (2022-07-10 03:53:43+00:00): Gracias por agregar los arboles, si te interesa ese topico, en este enlace del Wiki podras encontrar mas informacion: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dtree

Seria tambien genial poder agregar fotos a traves de la Aplicacion Mapillary desde tu celular.

Saludos

JJ
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
Eris-club (2022-07-11 11:29:33+00:00): Bing の画像はオルソ補正されていませんので歪みがあります。そのままトレースするべきではありません。
ovruni (2022-07-10 08:00:47+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado edificios que cruzan otros edificios, lo cual genera problemas de edificios superpuestos, además de agregar layer ficticios entre edificios [0]
Saludos
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1077354641/history
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:06:01+00:00): comprendo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
Ropino (2022-08-22 06:36:09+00:00): Hello,
"highway=2" together with buildings -> looks like a mistake, please check/correct.
thx in advance
ZeLonewolf (2022-07-12 14:09:52+00:00): Thanks for taking this on!
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-23 16:01:31+00:00): It seems someone is adding these non-existent railways back to OSM.

Some of it appears to be done by user:zluuzki
danieldegroot2 (2022-07-10 21:09:18+00:00): Hey and welcome,

I have sent you a private welcome message with useful information :)

Feedback;

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6687593708
You can seperate values (ie. artists' names) with a semi-colon (";").

(Sidenote: If the artists or the artwork have a wikidata or wikipedia page, you can add a tag ie. artist:wikidata)

Bicycle parkings:
You don't need to add indoor=no (or most tags *=no) to everything, this is redundant information, unless there exists a risk for others to think it is indoor (when it's mapped really close to a wall). covered=yes or covered=no and indoor=yes if true suffices here. With AEDs, they are usually mapped on a wall, so there adding indoor=no is useful.

Guidepost:
Looks ok

See the wiki for information on tags
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/

Regards,

Daniel