piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
gurglypipe (2018-01-16 14:23:08+00:00): Fixed a bit more in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55494753
Jason Harrison (2018-01-19 00:10:51+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55493280
mavl (2018-12-25 00:25:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Jason Harrison (2018-01-19 00:09:11+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55493298
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:20:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:48:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:38:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:55:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:15:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:48:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:45:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:51:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
YraFyra (2018-01-16 21:21:46+00:00): Hej
Jag är lite fundersam om ändring från pitch till playground i östra Lund samt ändring från playground till park i stadsparken. Vad har du för idé med det?
anlai (2018-01-16 22:20:45+00:00): Just a test. Fixed in #55506828.
YraFyra (2018-01-17 07:54:58+00:00): :-)
Sosha1996 (2019-03-18 05:45:14+00:00): تگ oneway=-1 مورد استفاده اینجا نیست. تگ درست oneway=yes می‌باشد.
mueschel (2018-01-17 10:54:18+00:00): Hi,
it looks like this import went completely wrong.
- power=pole are tagged as power=line
- each segment between two poles is an individual line
- there are many tags which shouldn't appear in the database, like these:
CONFIGURAT 	تکی
FOUNDATION 	خاک وسنگ
HASEARTHSY 	ندارد
HASUPPERBR 	ندارد
INSDATE 	1364
OBJECTID 	1055825
POLEHEIGHT 	12
POLETENSSI 	400
POLETYPE 	بتنی
POLEUSAGET 	متوسط-ضعیف-روشنایی
SUPPORTCOU 	0
- many objects do not have any useful tags.

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
and follow these rules for any import of data.
gurglypipe (2018-01-16 14:27:24+00:00): Thanks for the edits recently, they’ve been good! One minor note about this one: the recommended phone number format is ‘+44 1524 64740’ so that the country code is included unambiguously. Also, it looks like one digit is missing from that number?
Casey_boy (2018-01-16 14:32:26+00:00): Thanks. Will change the format. The number is correct, there are quite a few numbers with only five digits after the area code in this local area (i.e. the 4+5 format). You can verify this for this particular case by visiting their website :)
gurglypipe (2018-01-16 14:35:25+00:00): Oh, I didn’t realise it was even possible to have a 5-digit number after the area code. Having read the Wikipedia page I realise it’s more complex than that. Thanks for the explanation!
Andrea Musuruane (2018-01-20 16:21:46+00:00): Ciao. Il pezzo di "Via P. Crotta" che è stato aggiunto non è classificato correttamente. highway=secondary indica una strada di importanza regionale. E' più probabile che la classificazione corretta sia highway=residential. Ciao, Andrea
SafwatHalaby (2018-06-08 17:41:24+00:00): Hello, this is another edit where you moved a bus stop a large distance. Are you sure this is correct?
.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1803002972
ACS1986 (2018-01-16 17:36:28+00:00): Hi, 
Welcome to OSM. Adding abbreviated names tends to be controversial https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 . In any case, if these are to be included I'd suggest that the short_name tag is more appropriate than alt_name (these aren't alternative names).
Kind regards,
Adam
AeroXuk (2018-01-16 17:55:23+00:00): Hi Adam,
I did enter these as short_name first of all then I saw the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name page.  This said next to short_name '... not a nickname (use alt_name for that) ...'. So I went back and edited to tags to be alt_name.  Not sure which is correct now.
I was trying to add some common nicknames/abbreviations often used within postal addresses. This was to try and aid an open source address processing model that is trained on OSM data.
Thanks, AeroXuk.
SK53 (2018-01-17 13:52:07+00:00): Two things: UK postal addresses do not contain county names anymore, they are entirely based on postal town & post code. So Hayes, Middlesex and Hayes, Kent are no longer used to disambiguate places in postal addresses as defined by Royal Mail. Second, this is adding abbreviations which is not the normal OSM convention (as pointed out above). Most of these entitites will have an appropriate code (such as those of ONS, ISO & the NUTS codes of the EU) which can be used as a look-up external to OSM
SomeoneElse2 (2018-01-25 20:10:55+00:00): What's your source as "Derbs" for a short name for Derbyshire?  I live there and I've never used it...
Constable (2018-02-16 11:27:00+00:00): hi there, watch out, there was already a node named Roberts Park, rigth now it looks like there are two roberts parks here, you should merge the park area that you've been drawing with that node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/354315962
Thanks
Constable (2018-02-17 10:23:47+00:00): issue fixed, thanks Joe
Andrea Musuruane (2018-01-20 16:22:35+00:00): Ciao, per un edificio con una pianta così semplice non si deve usare una relazione multipoligono. Basta fare un semplice poligono. Ciao, Andrea
PT-53 (2018-12-05 14:52:58+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
ich überarbeite gerade Gebäude um die Adolffstraße in Ehingen. Dabei ist mir durch die Anzeige der Adolffstraße in JOSM aufgefallen, daß Du dort straßenbegleitende Radwege eingetragen hast, die ebenfals straßenbegleitende Gehwege aber nicht.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
rainerU (2018-12-06 10:03:55+00:00): Ich habe mich an diese beiden Wiki-Seiten gehalten: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Stra.C3.9Fenbegleitende_Wege

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Nakaner/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren#Baulich_nicht_von_der_Fahrbahn_getrennt

Auf beiden Seiten ist für den vorliegenden Fall kein *:foot oder sidewalk-Attribut vorgesehen. Ich halte das für einen Fehler und habe daher cycleway:*:foot=designated ergänzt. Ich habe das auch in der Altsteußlinger Straße gemacht. Dort kann ich leider die Situation westlich der Brücke über die B311 auf meinen Fotos nicht  genau erkennen.
PT-53 (2018-12-06 11:25:23+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
auf den von Dir verlinkten Wiki-Seiten steht - soweit ich das auf die schnelle richtig gesehen habe - nirgends, daß die Angabe von sidewalk nicht gebraucht wird.
Ich habe mich am Wiki sidewalk (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sidewalk) orientiert. Gem. dem dort aufgeführten Beispiel sollte beides (cycleway + sidewalk) eingetragen werden. So habe ich daß dann auch in BC, Bismarkstraße so umgesetzt.
Ich bin dieses Jahr 2-mal mit dem Rad dort in EHI vorbeigekommen und habe auch Bilder gemacht. Diese muß ich mal sichten, ob sie das fehlende Straßenstück abdecken.
Grüße
PT-53 (2018-12-06 11:26:19+00:00): Link zur Bismarkstraße:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168221848
Mike Baggaley (2018-01-22 11:17:20+00:00): Hi, on way 165209685, 165209689 and 165209690, you have added access=no, however this is overridden by the existing foot=permissive, so has no effect. I suggest removing the foot tags and adding a note to say why they are closed and when they are expected to reopen.

Cheers,
Mike
Ado nai (2018-01-16 15:26:22+00:00): Die Fläche ist zwar Gras bewachsen dennoch handelt es sich dabei um den Heimatpark (vgl. http://www.rahden.de/LEBEN-IN-RAHDEN/Stadt-Rahden/Unsere-Ortschaften/Kleinendorf , Absatz 3 ; http://www.sv-kleinendorf.de/index.php/component/content/category/9-chronik , rechte Seite im Bild). Die Grünfläche wird von Menschenhand gestaltet und nicht landwirtschaftlich genutzt. Desweiteren ist diese der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich. Desweiteren verstehe ich diese Website (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dgrass) so, dass es sich auch bei Grasflächen um Parks handeln kann. 
VIele Grüße
Digne (2018-01-17 18:26:39+00:00): Ik vond het een beetje een vreemde situatie met dat enorme vlak village_green. De JOSM validator geeft aan dat het geen probleem is om hier gras overheen te leggen, dus ik ga daar maar in mee.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:36:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:45:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:56:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:39:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
DD1GJ (2018-01-16 20:40:14+00:00): Revert, Drittaccount von https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1706

Das Umgehen aktiver Sperren mittels neuer Accounts wird nicht geduldet.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:42:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:48:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
user_5359 (2018-01-17 16:10:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add five areas like "https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341521017" with "building=cow_shed"="yes". I assumed you mean "building"="cow_shed", isn't it?
OF0 (2018-01-18 15:02:40+00:00): Ist das wirklich ein modernes Kreuz. Ansonst könnte man historic=wayside_cross verwenden.
viloan (2018-01-16 14:35:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:08:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:39:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-02-01 17:11:53+00:00): Beste mapper De Molen... zou je s.v.p. willen aangeven in je commentaar wat je edits inhouden. Andere mappers weten dan wat je aan het doen bent. Graag reactie.
De Molen (2018-02-01 17:56:05+00:00): Naam en bestemming aangepast van het oude stationsgebouw
eggie (2018-02-01 19:47:17+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor je reactie.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-01-16 15:28:28+00:00): Beste Herman Hiddema,
Zo is echt een adres niet meer te vinden in OSM. Volgens mij werkt dit niet. De adresnode zijn geïmporteerd vanuit het kadaster. Je hebt ze allemaal verwijderd.
Wel kun je alle adresnodes op een hoopje leggen bij de ingang. Dat is geen probleem.
eggie (2018-01-16 15:31:51+00:00): Een adres wordt overigens wel gevonden. Ik overleg even met de BAG importeurs of dit problemen gaat geven bij bv een update vanuit de BAG.
HermanHiddema (2018-01-16 16:06:00+00:00): Ah, dat wist ik niet. Als ik twee adressen op dezelfde plek drop, voegt hij ze automatisch samen met puntkomma's ertussen. Zal dus net zo'n grid moeten bouwen als er nu al is, dan :-/
eggie (2018-01-16 16:14:19+00:00): Wonderlijk... Dat zal de eigenschap van editor iD zijn. Die bevat soort ingebouwde lijm.  Wanneer je potlatch2 gebruikt zullen ze niet plakken. Ik wacht even af wat de BAG-jongens zeggen. Ik kan de changeset dan evt. terugdraaien.

Even wachten...
eggie (2018-01-16 16:24:26+00:00): Draadje https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681166#p681166
Op het forum ben je overigens ook van harte welkom. 
Ik draai de changeset terug. Wanneer je de adressen wil stapelen bij de ingang dat graag potlatch2 (plakt niet) gebruiken of JOSM.
Mocht er nog iets anders uitkomen kan ik altijd mijn eigen changeset nog terugdraaien.
eggie (2018-01-16 16:26:57+00:00): reverted by Wijzigingenset #55498160
arvdk (2018-01-16 16:44:06+00:00): Als je wil aangeven waar de ingang is, kan je dat ook gewoon mappen met 'entrance'. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance) Het uitlijnen op raster gaat heel makkelijk met JOSM. (shift + B). Ik gebruik die functie altijd om juist de adressen netjes uit elkaar te leggen, zodat ze zichtbaar worden op de kaart :) (Alleen binnen het gebouw waar ze bij horen, en als ze duidelijk nog niet op een specifieke plek liggen.)
Wat ik me nog wel afvraag: waarom wilde je de nodes bij de ingang leggen?
mueschel (2018-01-19 13:45:32+00:00): I reverted this changeset: Adding roads on top of each other, not using standard tagging.
highflyer74 (2018-01-17 14:42:17+00:00): Hello!

Could you please check the key addr_parish=* you added here? The addr:* tagging scheme is supposed to have ":" only (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr).

Thank you!
OF0 (2018-01-18 15:00:58+00:00): Hallo Marcus, da stehen keine zwei Wingeneratoren so nahe beieinander.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.65978/9.55122
OF0 (2018-01-18 15:06:51+00:00): Namen haben die Generatoren auch keinen. Name sollte grds. nur für Eigennamen verwendet werden.
OF0 (2018-01-18 18:32:04+00:00): Zur Info, westlich von Bobstadt, zwischen Königheim und Dittwar sowie zwischen Gerichtstetten und Neidelsbach werden zur Zeit Wingeneratoren errichtet
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mueschel (2018-01-17 12:12:22+00:00): Hi,
all these roads already exist in OSM  - now there are two overlapping roads and this causes errors for routing engines.

Please note that OSM is not a place to store personal data! You have to use your own private database for these.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:14:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].