Adamant1 (2019-04-24 22:56:02+00:00): "I haven't any clue what you know or don't know. If giving you links to a wiki answers your question as I do my best to remain polite in the face of your continuing verbal abuse"

This is the exact kind of none nonsensical arguing for the sake of it stuff you do. What's verbal abuse about saying you tagged something wrong or asking you to follow the same rules you tell everyone else they should. THEIR YOUR RULES DUDE. 

And how the freak are exact quotes from the wiki, THAT YOU WROTE, my opinion? Then you say I should provide a source for to back up my opinion (that's actually your writing), when it came from the link that you yourself sent me. that again is YOUR OWN FRAKIN WRITING AND it's your source.  I don't need to provide a link to the exact thing you link to.  Then you accuse me of having split personalities. That's exactly what someone with a split personality would do. "That's not my writing. I wrote that. Read this link. You should backup what you say with link I just gave you." It's makes zero sense man. You don't even apply your own rule that you wrote to yourself, then you it's not a rule, then it is because you wrote it. Jesus Christ. 

" If you think it needs re-writing or disagree with it, OK, "do the right OSM thing about that." 

Where did I say this had anything to do with the rule man? It's about this particular usage of it BECAUSE THEY AREN'T CLOSE TOGETHER. Which I said. For Christ sake. I'm not going to go through some protracted process to have a rule changed that I don't even care just so one edit can be fixed that doesn't fix it. ITS NOTHING ABOUT THE RULE. ITS THIS PARTICULAR CASE. I NEVER SAID OTHERWISE. 

"n this project, mapping includes reading (and sometimes contributing to) wiki, talking with other mappers (in civil tones, with humility and a polite demeanor) and reaching agreement."

Do it yourself then man. Have one conversation with me where actually have humility instead of talking about great you are every chance you can. Have one conversation where you don't talk down to me about how I should behave or what your imagined rules of OSM that I should follow are. Which you do in every paragraph. Have one conversation where  you don't go off about how I'm arrogant or have multiple personality disorder or any of the other useless, personal, insulting, things you keep saying at the same time you go off about your "civility." You can't go one sentence without throwing in some useless crap like that. Not even conversation, even one paragraph. I DARE YOU. I DON'T THINK YOU HAVE IT IN YOU. I've got more then plenty of civil paragraphs to you. You have zero to me. Until your actually willing to do what you keep telling me to do, you can piss off with it. I've already told you I'm not playing this hypocritical game where I'm the only 100% civil person while everyone treats me like crap. I'm sick and tired of it.

 "Reaching agreement" is something you repeatedly have proven to me and others you have difficulty achieving."

I reach agreement with people all the time on plenty of things. All you do is tell people to read a wiki page, that local mappers and consensus is important, and then drop them when it doesn't suit you. And you keep going off about things that aren't even issues and know one did. None of it has zero to with "reaching agreement" on anything. We shouldn't have to "reach agreement" on miss tagging anyway. ITS YOUR OWN FREAKEN RULE. There's nothing to reach agreement on. Like I said, There's ZERO in OSM about how people need to consult other people before changing tags or editing things anyway. Let alone do they have to read through a long winded Wiki page or "lobby" a project to do it. ZERO, NOTHING, NADA. Repeating it over and over like it's gospel doesn't make it true. 

Also, this is your edit. It's your account and your responsible for what you do with it. Not some train mapping group your a member of. If you make mistakes, its on you. Not them. Otherwise, the edits should be done under a group account with a link to project or at least a mention of it in the changsets and the on the accounts profile. As it would qualify as group mass editing at that point and I'm pretty sure that's the rule for things like that. I'm pretty sure everyone else in the group would take responsibility for their own mistakes to and not coup out by putting it on the rest of the group like you are.