piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscscnd (2020-04-16 07:17:14+00:00): Zamiast payment:gotówka powinno być payment:cash. payment:karta też nie może zostać. Zobacz <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment>.
gscscnd (2020-04-16 07:18:12+00:00): W `opening_hours=Mo-Fr 09:00-17:00, Sa 09:00-13:00` powinieneś użyć średnika, a nie przecinka.
AvantaR (2020-04-16 08:20:37+00:00): Dzięki wielkie za wszelkie uwagi, wciąż to dla mnie nowość. Już poprawiam!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:01:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83647501 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3610
mueschel (2020-04-18 08:57:49+00:00): Hi,
is this a place to share food (sorry, I don't speak Polish)?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792437583

There's a proposal for a tag for these:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/food_sharing

Cheers
Jan
km2bp (2020-04-18 18:03:42+00:00): Yes. Already corrected. Thank you.
DUGA (2021-08-18 23:02:59+00:00): The driveways you added here have offset. Please check your sources carefully before applying changes.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792438215
himabudd (2021-08-19 10:04:30+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs.
I've added the driveway using Esri aerial imagery(2020) and Maxar imageries.
Kindly, let me know if there are any further concerns regarding the edit.

Regards,
himabudd
Kovoschiz (2020-04-16 14:38:05+00:00): Please don't confuse place with natural features. The former is usually set as the center of the place. Use Wikidata or etymology tags to describe their relationship.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83632792
Kovoschiz (2020-04-16 14:41:03+00:00): Can you explain your mass changing of `=village`to `=hamlet`?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83632792
Britzz (2020-04-16 17:51:59+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).

Par ailleurs, vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : rien à redire, puisque le bâtiment n'est que la mairie, mieux vaut enregistrer les informations sur celui-ci, absolument :-)

Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83633273
mavl (2020-04-17 07:10:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83686786 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3631].
Kovoschiz (2020-04-16 14:39:05+00:00): Can you explain why it is a `=hamlet` instead of `=village`?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83633780
Britzz (2020-04-16 17:50:16+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).

Par ailleurs, vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : si je comprends bien, vous avez ajusté la limite administrative sur le tracé du cours d'eau actuel ; ce n'est pas forcément le cas. Les limites administratives sont établies à un instant t, si le cours de la rivière change après, la limite ne change pas pour autant.

Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83633954
SomeoneElse (2020-04-16 10:57:16+00:00): Hello - Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.

The way that such disputes are judged in OSM can be found at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  This particularly case is particularly difficult to model in OSM, as (at least in the case of the Spratlys) not only are there multiple claims but different reefs are actually occupied by the militaries of different nations.    OpenStreetMap, as per the linked PDF, gives more weight to the actual "line of control" than some other institutions.

If you think, after reading that PDF, that the Paracels and/or the Spratlys are not correctly represented in OSM then please email OSM's Data Working Group at "data@osmfoundation.org" explaining the problem in detail.  However, please don't just say things like "historically X belongs to country A" as that is way down the list of things that will be considered important.  In cases such as this there are often multiple historical precedents, treaties, UN resolutions and other factors that can be taken into consideration and cherry-picking from these can be used to support a number of different political views.

One more thing - there should be enough information in OpenStreetMap to allow anyone to create a map of any country with its desired borders.  This is important because some countries have laws about how they should be represented on maps, and those desired representations sometimes contradict each other (that's why the representation at openstreetmap.org can't please everyone - each set of map tiles covers the whole workd).  If you'd like help creating a map of Vietnam showing its desired borders please ask, and I'm sure that someone will be able to help you.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 11:58:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83647298 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83634605
Wynndale (2020-04-16 14:00:05+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jason_Brown/diary/392740
eggie (2020-04-16 09:08:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-16 09:11:16+00:00): Maak svp een keuze.. Nu is het dubbel.. 
Wanneer op het terrein wordt getagd niet nog eens de naam op het gebouw of de node.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-16 09:12:52+00:00): Zernike College Montessori Lyceum ?? Contradictio
devogon (2020-04-16 09:22:57+00:00): Volgens de website van de school (en brochures van de school zelf) is het "Montessori Lyceum Groningen." Alleen op het gebouw staat "Zernike".
eggie (2020-04-16 09:27:03+00:00): Oke.... wanneer dat de naam van het gebouw is lijkt me het correct..

Mapse verder..
Eggie
user_5359 (2020-04-16 15:31:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
abakus_uploader (2020-04-16 22:31:02+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
pio2_122 (2020-04-16 10:07:31+00:00): Why did you remove some area:highway areas in Poland?
adamos (2020-04-16 10:36:40+00:00): Hello Piotr,
I believe highways, especially in non-urban areas should be drawn as a linear object, a line, not as an area. The area were duplicate to the line. Dont you think?

Regards Adam
pio2_122 (2020-04-17 10:35:39+00:00): Hi Adam,
area:highway is something different than highway=* with area=yes
area:highway is not currently rendered in the Standard OSM.
"It is used as a form of Micromapping in addition to the routable, linear way tagged as highway=*."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway

So, In my opinion, this tag does not cause any problems with other things at OSM.

Regards, Piotr
TheSwavu (2021-04-18 03:46:33+00:00): Do you happen to know if BZ has merged with Lucky Shot? They seem to only have one Facebook listing (https://www.facebook.com/LuckyShotBZBurgers/about).

I was trying to fix the opening hours on Lucky Shot, but not much point if it's gone.

Kippax is just a bit too far away for me to check in person.
JoeG (2021-04-18 10:37:54+00:00): It's basically the same premises with two brands, so not sure how to map, hence why I left it as two POIs. It's hard to tell whether they are actually one or two businesses, but they do share the same space.
TheSwavu (2021-04-18 10:52:01+00:00): OK, thanks for that. I'll make the opening hours the same.
ALu68 (2020-04-17 12:56:01+00:00): Hallo Omnipart,

laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany ist für highway=service die Benutzung für den PSV (inklusive Busse) per se erlaubt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:psv .

Happy Mapping.
ALu68 (2020-04-17 13:02:42+00:00): Eventuell müsste access=no verwendent werden, wenn nur für Busse erlaubt.

siehe Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57045468
Omnipart (2020-04-21 10:00:20+00:00): Hallo ALu68,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich habe den Vorschlag gleich umgesetzt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:35:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83649296 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3616
Frans S (2020-04-17 16:57:41+00:00): Hello Lavanya
Thanks for mapping here,
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
Warin61 (2020-04-23 08:16:02+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM. 

Muiltipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments. The relation for No 39 I have edited to remove that problem. 

PS you may find Ersi imagery to be more upto date than bing, and Maxar possibly even better.
Warin61 (2020-04-24 07:27:43+00:00): No 47 has the same problem. Looks like ther are a few of them...
Use https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.95697&lat=-26.63113&zoom=18 and pan around to spot them. 
I'll leave them for you to fix, I'd just make them a simple way around the outside and not bother with the extra structure.
py_berrard (2020-04-16 10:16:01+00:00): attention vous aviez déplacé l'intermarché par mégarde
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 11:45:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83646581 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3608
mavl (2020-04-17 07:10:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83686786 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3631].
SomeoneElse (2022-02-08 10:13:26+00:00): Hello (and a belated welcome to OpenStreetMap!),
I just noticed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792485687 has an "office=yes" tag on it, which seems a bit odd - what sort of office is it?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 11:48:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83646775 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3609
Mark R Naird (2020-05-07 21:10:57+00:00): Please don't overwrite actual residential landuses with your admin boundaries: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=83641248
Amr@Gis (2020-05-31 08:43:45+00:00): Thank you for your comment but it was changed from landuse=residential to boundary=administrative by user : https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Baddiboy
BeKri (2020-04-16 10:27:57+00:00): Servus November2019,
zuerst mal Respekt, Du bist in Deiner Gegend ganz schön unterwegs.
Zugleich erlaube ich mir Dich auf 2 Sachen hinzuweisen.
1. Schau doch bitte auf 
https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/map#13/50.9095/10.2118/osm-wrongcity-minimalmissing-wrongstreet-wronghousenumber-outsideplz-falsepositive-dupes-errorbinoverlay

Alles was blau ist, sind Adressen denen was fehlt oder die nie einen Hausnummer haben werden, dann gehört der Rest der Adresse eigentlich auch wieder raus.
Alles was gelb ist hat ein Problem mit der Postleitzahl. Wenn Du oben rechts auf das ? klickst und dann neben einen gelben Punkt geht ein Fenster auf mit Infos über die Gegend und die PLZ, vielleicht hilft das.
2. Du benutzt noch iD, war Dir JOSM zu schwierig ?
JOSM bietet Tools zum einfachen zeichnen von Gebäuden und zum  Hausnummrtagging, die sehr hilfreich sind.
Und kleine Bitte: in iD gibt es die Taste Q, die macht den Umriss eines Hauses rechtwinklig (was für die meisten Häuser) zutreffen dürfte. Ohne Dir zu nah zu treten, aber manche Häuser haben schon einen recht schiefen Grundriss.
Weiter viel Spaß beim taggen wünscht
derBeKri
Britzz (2020-04-16 17:18:19+00:00): Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : les informations ajoutées sont bonnes mais la localisation clairement pas ! Il serait préférable de profiter de la modification pour déplacer le point sur/proche du lieu de vente effectif.

Bonne soirée.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83641537
Vinber (2020-04-17 13:55:53+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier 1 / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Cas particulier 2 / Si vous êtes un commerçant et que vous souhaitez voir apparaître votre commerce dans OpenStreetMap et donc également sur Ça reste ouvert, Qwant Maps, ... 1 lien ressource : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop 

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Britzz (2020-04-16 17:15:38+00:00): Vous aviez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : OK pour indiquer qu'il s'agit d'un marché (plus précis qu'un parking) mais comme il s'agit des deux en même temps, vous auriez pu conserver le parking et ajouter un point avec les informations relatives au marché.

Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83641938
ma-rt-in (2020-04-16 14:36:03+00:00): Hallo,
liegen auf dem alten Friedhof noch Gräber bzw wird der noch als Friedhof genutzt?
vg
AlKe88 (2020-04-16 14:44:20+00:00): Hallo, 
ja dort sind noch Gräber, es finden derzeit nur keine neuen Bestattungen auf diesem Friedhof statt.
VG
ma-rt-in (2020-04-16 14:44:51+00:00): Ok. Danke für die Info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 13:54:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83652980 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3622
Britzz (2020-04-16 17:12:16+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).

Par ailleurs, vous aviez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : c'est fait, c'est bien !
Idéalement l'indication "Maison détruite, n'existe plus ! " (très importante, bravo pour la précision), à enregistrer dans "note" (texte à l'attention des autres contributeurs) plus que "fixme" (il n'y pas de correction à apporter, vous l'avez fait).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:note
Et à lire cette page "comment" serait encore mieux ;-)

Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83642104
user_2066394 (2020-06-01 21:47:06+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours:covid19
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83642482
mavl (2020-04-17 07:10:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83686786 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3631].
Connecticut (2020-05-03 08:21:25+00:00): Bist dir bei diesem Weg sicher?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792497826

Siehe Note:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2179637#map=19/47.96317/13.50877&layers=N
Manuek (2020-05-03 19:37:54+00:00): Ich bin mit dem Rad gefahren und es war eine Traktorspur in der Wiese
Aber nachdem sich schon jemand beschwert hat werde ich den Weg morgen löschen
Ist halt sehr grenzwertig und sollte zu keinen Verwirrungen führen
Warin61 (2020-04-21 03:52:58+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for mapping the parks. 

Where you mapped relation 11003490, as a park inner for way 792498124 (a playground)... Umm no. The play ground is part of the park and not excluded from it. So there is no need for a relation. I have corrected this.
anisart (2020-06-04 11:08:26+00:00): Тропа 792499937 на основании чего рисовалась?
Linkid (2020-04-16 14:01:58+00:00): Hi! Thank you for your contribution :).
I see that you modified 719032392. But names in english and french were removed. Is it a mistake ? Can you put them back or do you want me to do it ?
Thank you again !
aitolos (2020-04-16 15:57:23+00:00): You are right, sorry
reverted as it was, kiosk
There is nothing else there, but a kiosk.
Trường Sa & Hoàng Sa (2020-04-16 11:48:46+00:00): yes. Hoang Sa from Việt Nam
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 13:49:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83652764 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3621
eggie (2020-04-16 11:45:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-16 11:59:13+00:00): Beste Timo... De naam zal niet zijn 	Wildlife Viewpoint
Dat is de functie. Dus beter die naam weghalen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-16 12:05:42+00:00): name "Wildlife viewpoint"  omgezet in description=
Timo12643 (2020-04-18 14:25:34+00:00): Hey eggie, bedankt voor de feedback. Ik heb een (hopelijk) betere verandering voorgesteld, zie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83744756
joost schouppe (2021-04-01 10:34:05+00:00): Hi Stein,
You also edited a node that had the same information: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6501480845/history#map=19/50.71553/6.01034
I've merged them together now.
BTW, you can see this at https://mapcomplete.osm.be/campersite?z=18&lat=50.71621&lon=6.010428#way/792507517
You could use that site to add a separate node and details for the waste water disposal etc.
A few things I noticed:
- "website" is for the official website, but camper-contact is just a website about this place, not "the" website
- you link an image hosted by park4night, I'm not sure they'd be happy about that. Best to take your own image and link that. With my link you can easily do that in the field
- right now, it is impossible to route to the stellplatz; all the access roads are "paths". I suppose one of them should be a service road?
Just minor remarks, thanks for all the work you're doing in Kelmis!
muralito (2020-07-07 16:27:36+00:00): Hola Lucas.

Area de servicio es lo que ya estaba mapeado. Vos la cambiaste a gasolinera, que ya estaban mapeadas dentro del area de servicios, al igual que el parking y el YPF Full. 

La volvi a dejar como antes, como area de servicios.
AndreasTUHU (2020-04-17 08:57:28+00:00): Szia!
Mozgatás közben letörölted az Őrangyal Patika címkéit. Ez volt a szándékod, tényleg bezárt a patika?

Üdv,
András
durban77 (2020-04-17 09:50:10+00:00): Üdv! Szándékos, az bezárt és iroda van a helyén, nem utcafronti bejárattal. Daniel
AndreasTUHU (2020-04-17 10:48:02+00:00): Rendben, köszönöm az infót! András
Baloo Uriza (2020-04-16 17:29:06+00:00): Not bad, but not great, either.  Be detail oriented when it comes to providing geometry.  Also, avoid abbreviations in addresses.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83646446
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 11:45:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 83627022, 83628240, 83640478, 83641636, 83642572.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 11:48:11+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 11:48:49+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 83640920.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 11:58:27+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 83634605.
archie (2020-04-16 12:30:03+00:00): Great, thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:01:58+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 83630343.
marczoutendijk (2023-11-04 20:37:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/654933913
the surface= tag is supposed to contain the type of the surface, not its size (area) in m2!
Please see: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
mapman44 (2020-04-22 05:13:39+00:00): This appears to be an import. Did you follow the import guidelines from the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83647694
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-16 12:06:47+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 83624027.
abakus_uploader (2020-04-16 22:31:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
rab (2020-04-16 14:34:07+00:00): hi,
there is the apple hook again :).
Please check commments on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83575552
Bing arial shows even a kind of gate close to Woodhall Road
ZocaloBlanco (2020-04-20 07:13:54+00:00): Hi rab. I’ve changed this back to a driveway since it does appear to access one property.