piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
poornibadrinath (2017-04-21 10:16:42+00:00): Hi Vedat63,
  I came across your changeset and noticed you have deleted a town. May I know the reason why this was deleted? Before you delete any feature on map, please make sure you have valid reason of why it needs to be removed. If an adequate reason is not provided, I will go ahead and revert the changes you have made. Thanks.
Best,
Poornima
Vedat63 (2017-04-23 02:28:35+00:00): Hello Poornibadrinath,sorry, I am a new user here, and I had no idea that I had removed that city, it happened by mistake I think. Thanks for your message.

Vedat
mavl (2018-12-25 20:10:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Rostranimin (2017-05-09 20:39:04+00:00): Hi Whiteyhmfc - taking a look at your recent edits here I'm not convinced that the mapping of the footways in this changeset are reasonable. As with other edits - do reply here or send me a message if you'd like some help as a new mapper with getting to grips with Openstreetmap. If we can talk about what you were aiming for here there are plenty of people who will be happy to help. The main thing to remember is that footways should be mapped where they properly exist on the ground and are separate from the normal uk 'pavement'.
Rostranimin (2017-05-14 23:13:51+00:00): Hi Whiteyhmfc - having looked again at these edits I've had a go at tidying up. In general you'll see that in Edinburgh (and many other places) the convention is to map pavements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks ) using the 'sidewalk' tagging scheme rather than as separate footways... unless they are completely separate from the road they are beside. I hope you're happy with how I've dealt with this - do get in touch if not. You clearly have local knowledge that Openstreetmap would benefit from.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:16:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:45:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:05:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:02:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:58:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2018-05-20 14:08:07+00:00): Hello, the highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488380053 has a website and a phone number. You mention in the change set comment a tool maplint. Is it possible that it deletes and redraws paths instead of correcting the keys?
mueschel (2017-04-24 10:47:58+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it has a strange tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4806907046
80-84= 41-55

Cheers, Jan
Alecs01 (2017-04-22 17:30:58+00:00): Hi, the hotel was already on the map http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42398405 I deleted your entry
mavl (2017-10-06 19:15:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
pnorman (2017-04-21 10:00:23+00:00): It seems odd that you've surveyed roads in Europe and east Asia and added the data in the same changeset. Is this correct?
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2017-04-21 14:37:23+00:00): TL;DR yes, unintended but correct data wise

I had played around with the StreetComplete app while being on vacation in Japan and waiting for a ferry to arrive.

After having "solved" everything I could in the neighborhood of the hotel we'd been in I then proceeded to solve some of the quests around my parents place in Germany to kill some more time.

I told the app to sync data in between, but that apparently didn't really close the changeset, so having all actions for Yukoshima and Enger merged ....
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2017-04-23 09:10:35+00:00): Now reported "Allow explicit changeset commit" as a feature request for StreetComplete:

https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/136
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
mavl (2017-10-06 19:15:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
nevw (2017-04-21 05:59:57+00:00): corr..source: LPI NSW imagery
mavl (2017-10-06 19:15:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
nevw (2017-04-21 06:00:22+00:00): corr..source: LPI NSW imagery
highflyer74 (2017-04-22 11:14:17+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall ist ein klein wenig schiefgegangen... Wir haben jetzt eine U-Bahn in der Datenbank, die es vermutlich nicht gibt. Generell ist das Hinzufügen von ÖPNV Linien (was in Form von Relationen geschieht) nichts für OSM Neulinge. Ich natürlich davon aus, dass Du versehentlich falsch gemappt hast und werde in den nächsten Tag mal versuchen, den Knoten zu entwirren. Sei so nett, in der Zeit keine weiteren Änderungen an den Objekten vorzunehmen, da dies die Problemlösung erschwert.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AWikiStart) ans Herz legen.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB,

Oliver
highflyer74 (2017-05-30 14:30:11+00:00): Hallo! 

Leider hast Du Dich auch nach einem Monat nicht gemeldet. In der Zwischenzeit hat ein anderer Mapper die U-Bahn wieder entfernt. 

Ich möchte Dich darauf hinweisen, daß OSM ein kollaboratives Projekt ist, das nur durch Kommunikation zwischen den Teilnehmern funktioniert. Deshalb wird erwartet, daß man auf Nachrichten, die einen erreichen auch antwortet...
Tomas Straupis (2017-04-21 07:13:19+00:00): Please do not change local names without knowledge on how they are used.
Jay May (2017-04-21 09:45:37+00:00): Hi. I live in Vilnius, I went already 3 times to Varnikai and I know people in this institution: http://www.vstt.lt/VI/index.php. The official name is Varnikų pažintinis takas and not Varnikų gamtos takas. Moreover, please have a look by yourself:
http://www.15min.lt/pasaulis-kiseneje/naujiena/per-lietuva/varniku-pazintinis-takas-salia-traku-pasivaiksciojimas-virs-pelkes-642-442802
Tomas Straupis (2017-04-21 10:04:37+00:00): OK. Changed name to „Varnikų pažintinis takas“ on all objects (ways, pois and relation).
SomeoneElse (2017-04-21 13:31:34+00:00): Oops - you've added this one-node building in the middle of the Atlantic at latitude 0, longitude 0.  I guess that this means that OsmAnd didn't have a valid location when you added it?
Best Regards,
Andy
tonyf1 (2017-04-21 07:39:40+00:00): Hi, you may well be right but Google Maps is not an allowable source because of copyright. Can you provide alternate evidence like a photo of a street sign?
mapovis (2017-04-21 08:03:15+00:00): Hi Tonyf1, 

Here is a link to a master plan for a development which is being built on this road. It shows the correct names for the surrounding roads and confirms that the data in OpenStreetMaps was incorrect. 

LINK: https://we.tl/hjjtk3HTAd
Supaplex (2017-04-23 14:33:15+00:00): 重覆標示了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5177809
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
ndm (2017-04-21 22:57:07+00:00): Strange - when this was first added it had this name - then the original mapper removed it -- has a street name been added back now? Seems odd as there's already another Southampton Mews very close.
Toub (2017-04-24 08:42:51+00:00): Oh, my bad!

I have been there again this morning, and in fact this is not a street, but just a private residential parking.

As I didn't see the inexistent street, I confused with the next street.

Thanks for revealing my mistake!

Now, should we just remove the street as in bing?
https://www.bing.com/maps/?FORM=Z9LH3
ndm (2017-04-24 23:15:58+00:00): I guess you could mark it as service. It might even be the name you added -- but it would depend on the addresses of the buildings near it.

I just commented as I could see what happened previously.
Hjart (2017-04-21 07:27:11+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dit bidrag.
Et lille stykke af den ende af vejen der munder ud i Rundholtsvej kom dog til at ligge oven i et andet stykke vej og et andet stykke blev ikke knappet korrekt sammen. Dette har jeg rettet.
Seriøs kartograf (2017-04-21 07:33:19+00:00): Tak for det Hjart. Jeg må vist hellere skifte til JSOM for, at holde 100% styr på overshots/undershots, dangeling nodes ect.
Hjart (2017-04-21 07:49:11+00:00): Den slags kan man sagtens lave i JOSM også, selvom validatoren dog vil gøre opmærksom på det :-)
mavl (2018-12-25 21:11:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:17:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:12:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:40:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:02:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:47:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Владимир К (2018-03-23 13:15:42+00:00): Что вы хотели обозначить?
Something B (2018-09-01 18:02:54+00:00): Может быть, стоит удалить эти точки?
mueschel (2017-04-24 10:42:49+00:00): Hi,
you added some strange tags to objects, e.g. 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488399710
"Market = Sub Post Office" and several more. What is the meaning of this?

Please have a look to the wiki to find out how common features like shops have to be tagged to be shown on the map.

Cheers, Jan
marc__marc (2019-04-21 22:39:22+00:00): Hello,
is it wanted or a typo to have removed the final S from amenity=toilets such as with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480231536 ?
Regards,
Marc
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-19 10:27:25+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3405444 ?
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
mavl (2017-10-06 19:15:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
gileri (2017-04-25 19:33:40+00:00): Bonjour xrt,

L'espèce des arbres est une information importante, chapeau de l'avoir relevée et mappée !

Il y a des tags plus adaptés pour stocker les information d'espèces que le tag name, étant donné que ces arbres n'ont pas de nom particuliers.

Un peu plus d'information est disponible ici :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:natural%3Dtree

ou sur la page en anglais :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree

Je ne saurais pas quoi conseiller comme combinaison exacte de tags pour les différentes espèces, si c'est pareil pour toi je te recommande de mettre l'espèce dans un tag note=* ou fixme=* afin que des contributeurs plus experts dendrologie puisse mettre les informations exactes
gileri (2017-04-25 19:44:40+00:00): Les valeurs les plus utilisées des tags présentés dans les pages wiki peuvent être trouvée par cet outil : 

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.fr/
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:20:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:33:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-09-09 15:23:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
mavl (2018-12-25 19:26:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
gileri (2017-04-25 19:28:41+00:00): Bonjour xrt,

Pas besoin d'ajouter "bio" au nom, l'information est présente via le tag "organic=yes".
xrt (2017-04-29 07:23:31+00:00): bio enlevé. Ce que je voulais c'est que cela apparaisse...
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:35:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:40:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:47:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:28:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:28:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:10:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:33:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
letihu (2017-07-19 19:51:50+00:00): Dieses Gebiet
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488417193/history
sollte geschlossen sein. Kannst Du das bitte in Ordnung bringen?
GerdP (2017-09-28 08:37:43+00:00): Moin!
Bitte prüfen:
Bing und DigitalGlobe zeigen aktuell dieses Gebäude 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488417204
und viele weitere etwa 50m nord-westlich versetzt.
Fuschi (2017-09-28 12:03:58+00:00): ah, endlich mal Luftbilder, auf denen auch was zu erkennen ist :D
Danke für den Hinweis!
GerdP (2017-09-28 12:10:44+00:00): Irgendwo muss es da auch eine Straße geben, auf der auch Fahrzeuge dort hinkommen. Im Moment gibt es nur hw=path
Fuschi (2017-09-28 12:21:05+00:00): naja als Straße würde ich das nicht bezeichnen :D 
ist auch keinerweise befestigt oder dergleichen
GerdP (2017-09-28 12:58:11+00:00): Also kommt man dort gar nicht mit einem Auto hin?
mavl (2017-10-06 19:14:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52687260 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47970300].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:04:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:32:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:08:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:04:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:39:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:00:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:21:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:18:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:27:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].