piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk (2021-12-15 15:47:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114968909 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of incompatible edits on golf courses.
confusedbuffalo (2021-12-11 18:03:15+00:00): Hi, I was fixing some postcodes and spotted that you'd accidentally set the place tag to "<different>" on a few objects, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86254063/history
There may be more, I haven't checked, and not sure if you want to set it to something else.
Thanks
brianboru (2021-12-12 13:39:55+00:00): Thanks for the heads up and for acting as quality assurance. Finger trouble again!
jodd (2022-02-18 21:23:12+00:00): Hallo Zepperoni,
als du die Bushaltestelle eingetragen hast, hast du dich bestimmt beim operator (RKH) vertan, oder? Betreiber der Frankfurter Bushaltestellen sollte die VGF sein.
VG jodd
Zepperoni (2022-02-19 21:53:15+00:00): Ja stimmt, sehe gerade das bei der Linie 48 mehrmals RKH eingetragen ist. Habe das wahrscheinlich irrtümlich von dort übernommen.
Tusedi26quejesu38 (2021-12-12 21:09:21+00:00): Cajero electrónico (ATM) de Banco AFIRME. Se encuentra localizado, dentro de 7 Eleven.
martinst (2021-12-11 16:34:36+00:00): Hallo Lin21A,
vielen Dank für deine Ergänzungen. 
Bei name= werden in OSM nur Eigennamen eingetragen. "Badeufer am Barmsee" und "Staudamm des Stausees" könnten bei description= stehen.
Gruß Martin
DressyPear4 (2022-01-17 19:57:26+00:00): Olá, quando for apenas caminhão use hgv=no
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Eric S (2021-12-11 13:33:44+00:00): Bonjour,

Je vois que vous avez la nouvelle piste cyclable Chronovélo qui entre sur le campus. Par contre, vous n'avez pas du tout pris en compte les intersections avec les voies existantes. C'est normal?

Cordialement
carllito (2021-12-11 14:40:46+00:00): Alors, non car je débute :-/ et aussi cette piste cyclable vient d'être ouverte et n'est pas encore totalement terminée (surtout au niveau de la signalisation au sol avec les passages piétons etc...)
Eric S (2021-12-11 17:17:12+00:00): Ok. Je vais essayer de faire un relever GPS de précision et compléter tout ça. Les chemins piétons ont aussi été pas mal modifiés. Il y a aussi des travaux (parking?) à la place des anciennes tours du CROUS.
jeslop (2021-12-09 22:46:02+00:00): Ha utilizado un conjunto de cambios demasiado amplio para eludir la posibilidad de supervisión por parte de la comunidad. además lo ha utilizado para realizar cambios vandálicos en las etiquetas y usando un usuario nuevo para evitar el bloque de sus otras cuentas. El cambio ha sido revertido.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-12-10 17:32:49+00:00): Please use this offset in Bing image in the Montreal area: 0.6, -1.54

This is the correct aligment calculated with official geodesic data from Quebec government.

(use the "adjust imagery offset" setting in id editor)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-12-10 01:00:30+00:00): Boa noite, isso foi discutido com a comunidade?
João Paulo Polles (2021-12-10 02:36:48+00:00): Boa noite, não.
Isto foi efetuado principalmente devido ao fato de ter as cadastrado, através do GeoMCRondon_API, e que houveram necessidade de atualização as quais demandavam uma certa correção, foi efetuada a remoção.
Vale constar que as feições já foram repostas através de changesets criados no usuário GeoMCRondon_API.
Caso deseje ter mais informações sobre o projeto que está envolvido o usuário citado, favor verificar meu perfil.

Muito obrigado de qualquer forma.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
mariotomo (2021-12-19 19:29:56+00:00): hola y bienvenido a mapear Panamá.  pusiste un par de 'natural=scrub' en combinación con 'leaf_cycle' y 'leaf_type', que son típicos de 'natural=wood'. es intencional?
you also left gaps between mostly adjoined natural tagging. while the effect on the rendered map looks fine, the vectorial data looks a bit weird. would you like to get in contact with the (very few) mappers of the area? https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61 ; https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
archpdx (2021-12-10 01:53:56+00:00): Hi there!

It looks like you added the building outline as an 'Apartment Complex'. Apartment complexes are a type of landuse so this should really cover the entire property rather than just the building. The building itself should be an 'Apartment Building'.

Also quick tip: you can square the corners of buildings by selecting on it and pressing 'q'. This building looks like it only has square corners so this tool would be particularly useful.

It looks like you also left some buildings and service roads that were there before this apartment building was constructed, so I would remove those. Also remember to remove the gates attached to these service roads.

Additionally, it seems like you're a paid mapper, so I highly encourage you to read the Organised Editing Guidelines before you continue mapping. You can read them here:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Thanks for reading all of this! If you have any questions or need any help please feel free to respond to my comment.
JackieMapping (2021-12-10 18:55:32+00:00): Hi there, thank you so much for the tips especially the q shortcut. I changed it to an apartment building which makes total sense and removed the service roads and gates, etc. I am not a paid mapper so I have submitted those changes for review. I will definitely take a look at that guide though. Thanks again for your help.
archpdx (2021-12-10 19:52:48+00:00): Thanks for responding. I meant paid mapper as in editing the map for commercial purposes, such as for a client, not as in paying for a membership - hopefully this clears things up.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
DENelson83 (2024-03-15 08:02:09+00:00): Why is there a ford on this residential street?  Is it permanently flooded?
ElliottPlack (2021-12-17 17:17:35+00:00): Designer,

In this version you deleted some roadways for no apparent reason other than the comment "virginian" on your changeset. Why did you do this? This change will be reverted as it is damaging to the map.

--
Elliott Plack  
OSM Foundation  
Data Working Group
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114758620
EP_Repair (2021-12-19 03:19:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115114426 where the changeset comment is: Reverting changes to roads for a video game that break the way water works. ref Ticket#2021121310000109
emvee (2021-12-14 21:11:10+00:00): Hoi multichill,

Ik was ik Haarlem bezig en kwam deze changeset tegen.

Twee opmerkingen:
* cycleway=opposite is niet meer van deze tijd, zie https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65612
* moped=yes op highway=residential is een beetje overbodig, zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Netherlands

Groeten,

Martin.
multichill (2021-12-14 23:13:56+00:00): Hoi Martin, dat topic is echt volslagen onvindbaar. Waarom heeft niemand ooit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite dan bijgewerkt als er consensus is? Op https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eae zie ik ook nog steeds veel te veel hits. Waarom is hier dan geen robot overheen gehaald?

Moped / mofa = yes weet ik dat wellicht wat overbodig is. Alleen in de oude stad gedaan omdat het daar heel ondoorzichtig is.
emvee (2021-12-15 08:08:51+00:00): Hoi,

Die consensus lijkt er te zijn binnen het Nederlandse deel van OSM. Internationaal is dat een ander verhaal

Een robot voor dit soort dingen wordt niet als een goed idee gezien, en daar zit naar mijn idee wat in. Ik wil wel eens wat bijwerken maar kijk dan gelijktijdig alle oneway na, ook in Haarlem was er een stuk weg dat niet eenrichtingsverkeer (meer) is terwijl het werk zo getagd was
multichill (2021-12-17 17:49:29+00:00): Even voor de duidelijkheid: Ik vind het helemaal prima dat er voor een tag is gekozen, ik vind het alleen jammer dat we met z'n allen dubbel werk aan het doen zijn. Ik reageer wel op dat topic.

Wat betreft eenrichtingsverkeer: Ik reed vanmorgen nog door de Kleine Houtstraat en ik kan me niet herinneren dat ik een bord ben tegengekomen (Lange Veerstraat ook niet trouwens). Als ik het niet zeker weet blijf ik er liever vanaf.
emvee (2021-12-19 15:31:17+00:00): Geen reacties (nog) op het topic...

Wat betreft verkeersborden is er de Verkeersbordenkaart, zie https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70487. Niet 100% betrouwbaar maar best goed.

Wat betreft robot wijzigingen zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits
mariotomo (2022-01-16 16:20:49+00:00): hi, thank you for adding local information. I generally greet new mappers to OSM Panama, hoping to recruit volunteers to OSM: there are *very* few mappers in Panama. if you are in the area and wish to stay in contact with the community, you will be most welcome.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
fabiotofy (2021-12-09 21:15:59+00:00): Per il rione di San Cilino non sono proprio d'accordo. Il tag originale era posto sulla nota frazione "San Cilino Inferiore" chiamato anche "San Cilino". Il tag lo hai riposizionato su quello che veniva chiamato San Cilino Superiore, frazione sicuramente meno nota e poco usata.... farò qualche altro approfondimento
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114759425
alessandrocarmeli (2021-12-09 21:31:29+00:00): Si: ho voluto spostarlo in posizione più centrale (ricordiamo che San Cilino è posto nel'area tra San Giovanni e Conconello). Io mi sono basato sia dal link del cs souce e sia dalle tabeline dei civici scritte rosse sfondo bianco presenti ancora in loco su via Da Todi
alessandrocarmeli (2021-12-09 21:33:14+00:00): credo che siamo almeno d'accordo che Guardiella non è nei pressi della SR58, ma vicino all'omonima via...
fabiotofy (2021-12-10 07:25:26+00:00): sicuramente per Guardiella hai fatto benissimo!
alessandrocarmeli (2021-12-10 13:51:14+00:00): 👍🏼👍🏼
Natfoot (2021-12-09 21:07:18+00:00): Welcome to Open Street Map nice Railroad Edit.  Glassman may be along soon to give you some pointers.  -Nat
EverettRailfan (2021-12-09 21:08:10+00:00): poggers
VictorIE (2022-03-30 09:42:13+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2745781/history#map=17/53.36488/-6.28821

What's happening with the names here?
G_P_J (2021-12-10 08:32:03+00:00): Cześć, 
mała uwaga odnośnie adresów. Jeśli dodajesz adresy w miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic użyj proszę znacznika "addr:place" zamiast "addr:city". Znacznik "addr:street" nie powiniem być użyty w takim przypadku. Więcej informacji o zasadach opisywania adresów znajdziesz tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:addr

Pozdrawiam i udanego mapowania :)
Piotr
ecoute (2021-12-10 11:30:35+00:00): Ok, dziękuję za uwagę. Będę zwracał na to uwagę. Pozdrawiam.
AntiCompositeNumber (2023-02-19 21:05:49+00:00): There is only one movable segment of the Sarah Mildred Long bridge, the tracks go down the middle of the road segment. The movable span lowers to the rail level when a train has to pass.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-15 15:47:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114968909 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of incompatible edits on golf courses.
AngocA (2021-12-10 22:45:53+00:00): Living street does not exist in Colombia.
AnonJason (2021-12-10 23:30:07+00:00): Hi AngocA, thanks for bringing this to our attention and updating the classification.
Wulfmorn (2021-12-10 00:16:58+00:00): Hei og velkommen til OSM. Ser du endret på en rekke data i Skotterud (https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=114760798)

Så noe tips og råd:
1. Stedspunktet bør ikke knyttes inn i veinettet. Jeg ser du la det i veikrysset ved biblioteket.

2. Det er ikke vits å slette eller flytte på adressenodene. Disse importeres og oppdateres automatisk direkte fra kartverket så sletting og flytting vil bli flyttet tilbake i neste oppdateringsrunde.
Det er greit å ha samme adresse på en bedriftspunkt ved siden av (dobbelt eller ikke etter egen smak)

3. Jeg ser du opprettet et punkt for ungdomsskolen (feilskrevet). Dette er ikke nødvendig da hele området er definert som ungdomsskolen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624239507/).

4. Jeg ser også at du lagde testestasjonen på Magnormoen som "hospital". Dette er ikke korrekt. Her er hvordan: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/COVID-19_-_How_to_Map

Ellers veldig fint om du fyller på med bedrifter og butikker. Jeg har jobbet mye på veinett og bygninger, men har ikke hatt anledning å se på bedriftene.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-15 15:47:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114968909 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of incompatible edits on golf courses.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-11 13:17:42+00:00): Hello,
East of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8901430646/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657422273
Looks like a stream flowing east.
Immediately west of there, it does not appear to exist.
North of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9325603090/history
It does appear to be a path.
Best Regards,
Andy
VARVAR8 (2021-12-11 14:53:28+00:00): Hi. I am not the author of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657422273
I just clarified this path.
Believe me, he exists there. Because I was there personally. If it was possible to post a screenshot here .. I would show.
VARVAR8 (2021-12-11 15:02:52+00:00): I fixed it.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-15 15:47:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114968909 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of incompatible edits on golf courses.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-15 15:47:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114968909 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of incompatible edits on golf courses.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-11 11:49:00+00:00): Hello,
What is your source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962737142 east of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8905566343 ?  That node was originally added by you.
On the available Bing imagery, there's nothing.  On Maxar imagery it looks like there's some temporary logging access, but not all the way to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8955362997/history (also added by you).
Best Regards,
Andy
VARVAR8 (2021-12-11 23:14:33+00:00): Fixed!
mapper999 (2021-12-10 18:54:08+00:00): Hallo und herzlich Willkommen bei OSM,
ist hier das Radfahren auf dem Gehweg wirklich erlaubt, zusätzlich zu den Radfahrstreifen auf der Fahrbahn?
Nakaner (2021-12-10 19:46:43+00:00): Hallo,

ich bin heute Morgen stadteinwärts unter der Eisenbahnüberführung Ettlinger Straße hindurch gefahren und dann nach rechts in die Rüppurrer Straße abgebogen. Ein Freigabe des Gehwegs für Radverkehr ist mir nicht aufgefallen. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass das Ordnungsamt das so angeordnet hat – erst recht nicht, wenn ein neu gebauter Radfahrstreifen existiert. Dazu habe ich zu viele gute Erfahrungen (sic!) mit deren StVO- und Richtlinien-Kenntnis gemacht, dass ich denen derartigen Unsinn nicht einfach so unterstellen kann.

Ich befürchte, dass LonelierWolf entweder das Fahrradrouting verbiegen möchte oder sich nicht gut genug mit den Verkehrsregeln für Radfahrende auskennt. Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114678164

Ich habe das Thema Benutzungspflichten, Geisterradeln usw. auch erst vor knapp zehn Jahren als Mapper kennen gelernt (insbesondere im Zusammenhang mit dem Radwegstreit in der Bremer OSM-Community 2014).

Viele Grüße

Michael
mapper999 (2022-01-02 16:00:26+00:00): @LonelierWolf: Danke fürs Korrigieren! Jetzt passt es wieder in der Ettlinger Straße.
cEvLGWiQ (2021-12-10 14:12:58+00:00): I suspect that the data source does not have the up-to-date date in regards to Hoogstraat. I can confirm that the street name is Hoogstraatje
smootheFiets (2021-12-10 14:26:21+00:00): I don't think I've touched that street, have I?  This changeset is about buildings in the area of Hoogstraat(-je), as far as I can tell.
Anyway, addresses are imported straight from the Dutch cadaster.  If the name doesn't match what's written on street signs (which, I trust, is the case here), we have agreements within the NL community on how to deal with this.  Except, I'm not quite sure about them...
I _suspect_ it's status quo ante: 'name as on file' as name, 'name as on signs' as alt_name. Or the other way round?
Might be a good question to ask at the forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 (the operating language tends to be Dutch; most mappers would be fluent in English, though.  If ever needed, I'll be happy to translate)
E de Wit (2021-12-16 13:16:06+00:00): The BAG adresses show "Hoogstraat".
If the street name is indeed "Hoogstraatje" then the adresses should keep their BAG adressname and the street should have:
name=Hoogstraatje
official_name=Hoogstraat

If you're sure the adressnames are incorrect as well it should be reported back to the BAG and changed after it has been approved.
smootheFiets (2021-12-16 13:34:49+00:00): Confirmed that the BAG (government database of addresses and buildings) shows "Hoogstraat" for the addresses.  For street names, the official repository is NWB (nationaal wegenbestand), which I consult via https://www.rijkswaterstaat.nl/kaarten/wegbeheerders

Here's an interesting one: if I search the link above for "Groningen Hoogstraat", it sends me to Winschoten. This street only pops up after clicking "show more results" as "Hoogstraatje, 9711LN Groningen". However, if I click on that street itself, it pops up as "Hoogstraat - Groningen".  Seems like the NWB is in an inconsistent state. I don't think I've witnessed that before.
Croissanterie du Nord (#4) and bar "Block and Barrels" (#3-5, not on the card, it seems) appear to use Hoogstraatje, which they may have taken from Google Maps.  Kvk.nl lists them under Hoogstraat.

 I'm not sure what to make of that.
E de Wit (2021-12-16 14:27:10+00:00): My experience with NWB data in Friesland so far hasn't been all too positive unfortunately..

When I look at the adjacent shops contact info they all have "Hoogstraatje", this could mean that the BAG is wrong as well.

I think we should take that as a starting point and place a 'terugmelding' in BAG about incorrect adresses and see where that leads us. I've got time to report it this evening.
E de Wit (2021-12-16 17:38:32+00:00): Reported under 'meldingsnummer': BAG00095602
E de Wit (2021-12-17 17:22:14+00:00): Translated reaction:
"The official street name is 'Hoogstraat'. Locally it's also called 'Hoogstraatje'. The street sign is going to be replaced as soon as possible."

Usually it takes a long time to replace street signs so I don't know when. But they intend to keep the name 'Hoogstraat' instead of the local name.
barefootstache (2022-09-19 22:31:37+00:00): Hey, it seems like you dropped the SAC scale from T3 to T2 for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113340334. 
Recently did the hike and wouldn't agree. Can you explain what source you were referencing?
bobeeeze (2021-12-09 22:53:29+00:00): Source: Survey, PNOA
marczoutendijk (2021-12-15 15:47:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114968909 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of incompatible edits on golf courses.
janolezab (2021-12-09 23:08:40+00:00): Better description: "Adding label to boundary relation"
nevw (2021-12-10 03:37:00+00:00): Hi
If the construction of these roads is complete, you can delete the “construction=residential” tag

The usual progression is ...
highway=construction + construction=residential
to
highway=residential + tags for surface like asphalt, speed limit, etc
Mashin (2021-12-11 19:59:58+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for editing, but for the future please don't delete existing objects e.g. forest, water areas,...

Also I recommend looking at wiki to see how to properly draw golf green, fairway, rough  polygons
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
AngocA (2021-12-10 22:45:26+00:00): Living street does not exist in Colombia.
AnonJason (2021-12-10 23:29:58+00:00): Hi AngocA, thanks for bringing this to our attention and updating the classification.
AngocA (2021-12-10 22:47:03+00:00): Living street does not exist in Colombia.
AnonJason (2021-12-10 23:30:21+00:00): Hi AngocA, thanks for bringing this to our attention and updating the classification.
olo81 (2021-12-11 19:04:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114668060
olo81 (2021-12-14 17:50:50+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74470
majkaz (2021-12-10 08:59:10+00:00): Ahoj, vítám u úprav Openstreetmap.
Prosím tě, co přesně se snažíš zmapovat? name=building je rozhodně špatně, a samotný bod s prodejem modelů "mimo zástavbu" na mapě je kapku podezřelý.
AppleME (2023-12-10 09:39:50+00:00): Or how to type 'done' apparently. though I really hope I did know what I did.
SomeoneElse (2023-02-20 23:55:51+00:00): Are you sure that you haven't lost information here?
I don't think that "ruins" really does it justice: https://www.york.ac.uk/lifelonglearning/sciencetrail/dragonstones/
ChillyDL (2023-02-21 00:34:51+00:00): As far as I know these are stones collected from the landfill that used to be there and that were freely arranged in the mid-90s, when the tip was turned into a park. The tagging "ruins" is from the user who added them to the database 11 years ago and who also warned that this is not a historic object.
I am not convinced this actually is art, rather landscape architecture. But I suppose it could be re-tagged as  tourism=artwork and artwork_type=sculpture, if you prefer this.
What do you think?
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-15 14:59:59+00:00): Hi, could you hold off on random changes to classification of dangling bits of highway like this?  Please check your Slack messages.  We would like to collaborate on defining what should be trunk on Virginia.  Dangling trunk segments are inconsistent with the emerging national consensus.
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-15 15:35:56+00:00): Note that in general most of your classification changes seem to be okay after reviewing recent changes.  If we can collaborate, then we'll avoid having to re-do a bunch of work later and everyone will be on the same page as to what the right classifications are.
Joseph R P (2021-12-15 16:29:40+00:00): In Virginia and most surrounding states, bypasses and expressways like this are always tagged as trunk. I could log into Slack but I'll have to try to remember my password since I got locked out a while ago.