piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2020-08-18 12:09:47+00:00): Hallo,

könntest du bitte nicht nach jedem einzelnen, bearbeiteten Objekt auf "Speichern" klicken, sondern das erst nach ein paar inhaltlich (Quellen oder Art der Änderungen) zusammenhängenden Änderungen machen? Jedes Mal, wenn du auf "Speichern" klickst, wird ein neuer Änderungssatz angelegt. Änderungssätze sind dazu da, inhaltlich zusammen gehörende Änderungen zusammenzufassen (z.B. Erhebungen aus einer Mappingrunde vor Ort, systematische Änderungen gleicher Art). Die Sichtung von Änderungen durch deine Mit-Mapper erfolgt in allen Qualitätssicherungswerkzeugen (z.B. https://osmcha.org/) anhand der Änderungssätze.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Frans S (2020-09-08 11:54:23+00:00): 
Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mapping should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Wulf4096 (2020-11-18 16:36:02+00:00): Hallo.
Ich hab die Änderung rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94380170

Der Weg existiert. Siehe Mapillary sobald die Bilder freigeschaltet sind.
Zx_osm (2020-11-18 17:13:31+00:00): Nun - ich orientiere mich an der Realität.
Wenn man direkt dort steht siieht man: es gibt keinen Weg am Bach entlang (nicht einmal einen Trampelpfad) und die Verbindung zu den mittlerweile gebauten Gebäuden ist durch geschlossene Zäune versperrt.
Wer diese Pfade für eine Navigation verwendet, landet in einem durch Renaturierung umgebauten Bereich ohne Pfade.
Wulf4096 (2020-11-18 17:44:58+00:00): Und ich war heute vor Ort und bin mit dem Rad auf dem Weg gefahren.
Hier noch paar Bilder:
https://osm.wulf.eu.org/IMG_20201118_161638.jpg
https://osm.wulf.eu.org/IMG_20201118_161651.jpg
https://osm.wulf.eu.org/IMG_20201118_161734.jpg
https://osm.wulf.eu.org/IMG_20201118_161757.jpg
https://osm.wulf.eu.org/IMG_20201118_161813.jpg

Offenbar wurde der Weg kürzlich mal wieder freigemäht. Im Sommer war der tatsächlich arg zugewachsen (aber trotzdem passierbar).
Wulf4096 (2020-11-22 08:15:07+00:00): Mapillary ist nun online:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SK7QW43Q9f9O23qDSjmZqH
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:46:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89316308
kannix (2021-12-14 12:45:07+00:00): any reason deleting relation 10909023, 
European Inland Navigation Network ?
cefaysal (2020-08-13 03:47:47+00:00): What is this?
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-22 18:30:47+00:00): Hi Kevin, I noticed you've added name=Cascade and similar to a lot of waterfall nodes in Connecticut. I admire your dedication to tagging waterfalls, but the name tag should really be reserved for the actual name and not labels or descriptions, please see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
In this specific case I see you initially named it "Wesley Falls" but then replaced it with "Cascade" -- is the official name Wesley Falls or did you construct it from the name of the road/trail?
Anyway, I found two alternative ways of tagging waterfalls on taginfo. Unfortunately they aren't very popular, but they would allow you to continue tagging waterfalls without using the name tag, and perhaps it's something we could discuss with others and document on the OSM wiki. One option is to replace waterway=waterfall with waterway=cascade. The other option is to continue using waterway=waterfall and use the additional tag waterfall=cascade, which makes more sense to me given cascade is a type of waterfall, and there seem to be many other types as well. Either option would allow you to continue tagging and search for cascades in Connecticut using Overpass. Let me know what you think, but I think the Cascade names should be removed sometime soon. Thanks, -Andrew
letihu (2021-02-15 19:30:55+00:00): tags fehlen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836493630/history
letihu (2021-02-15 19:35:47+00:00): hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836493629/history
auch
user_5359 (2020-08-13 04:36:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The key "building:levels" counts the level of a building above the ground. It is therefore a number. Please check the given value.
user_5359 (2020-08-13 04:30:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag building:levels=0 means that the building has no height above ground level. If you want to indicate that your shop is located on the ground floor, the tag level=0 is the correct tag. (see https://www.osm.org/way/836497248)
trigpoint (2020-08-13 15:28:42+00:00): Hi
Just wondering what the source of all these VAT numbers is?

Cheers Phil
Djminisite (2020-08-13 16:41:22+00:00): They've come from me visiting all the venues in question and asking for a VAT receipt :) a survey... while eating food!
trigpoint (2020-08-13 16:49:53+00:00): Thank you, I had never considered mapping such a thing and spotted a very large changeset area.

Cheers Phil
Djminisite (2020-08-13 18:22:27+00:00): No problem. Need them for work anyway so just collated them all and uploaded them, got another set to do when I get a chance. They’re also helpful for addresses and phone numbers usually
PT-53 (2020-11-02 07:48:21+00:00): Hallo _torsten_,
diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836502280/history
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Grüße
_torsten_ (2020-11-02 07:58:52+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Das war ne Hilfslinie. Hab sie jetzt gelöscht.
habi (2020-08-20 07:06:46+00:00): Hey
You've added bunch of crooked buildings in this changeset.
It would be great if you use the 'Q' key deliberately, as specified in the instructions of this HOTOSM task: "After drawing the outline and tagging as a building, use the 'Q' key in the iD web editor to "square" the corners."
Thanks!
mariotomo (2020-10-29 15:25:35+00:00): hola Maritza.  estoy revisando la infraestructura de transporte público, habrás visto los mensajes en el grupo.  bueno, revisando encuentro una estación de ferrocarril en Angulito, cerca de Mariato!  qué es lo que querías representar? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836506246
mariotomo (2020-10-29 15:31:56+00:00): ah, no, sorry, un momento, no necesariamente "de ferrocarril", pero igual cuantas veces he viajado de Santiago a Malena, nunca he notado ninguna estación, terminal, parada especial.
Константин Гам (2020-08-13 15:25:47+00:00): "Отрабатывая заметки" вы сломали супермаркет. Не надо так, пожалуйста
Ser9ei (2020-08-13 16:22:26+00:00): Можно больше конкретики? Какой супермаркет?
Ser9ei (2020-08-13 16:28:58+00:00): Если речь про Магнит, то на оф. сайте Магнита он числится не как супермаркет, а как "Магнит у дома". Поэтому тип был изменён. Больше супермаркетов не вижу.
aceman444 (2020-11-17 13:05:22+00:00): Hi, what Air/Drone photography are you using? On some objects you put source=Bing, but those roads aren't on the outdated Bing photos yet, so that is suspicious. Also, you are regularly missing to add common node where a road and a footway intersect. Those nodes are needed for proper pedestrian routing (sometimes they have to use the road if there is no sidewalk or it is not mapped yet).
Frans S (2020-08-13 08:07:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A request. Please map more precise and square reach rectangular building with the Q key Over half of your mappings are not that accurate mapped.
Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub

Best regards
BCNorwich (2020-08-13 06:17:48+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reverted this changeset because you inadvertently doubled up the road Broadstone Drive and dragged the track at north out of position. 
I assume you have knowledge that Broadstone Drive is now in use so I've made your tagging amendments to it.
Regards Bernard.
limes11 (2020-08-12 20:31:46+00:00): Hallo, 

in der letzten Änderung wurde highway=tack statt track verwendet, deshalb tauchte sie nicht auf. Normalerweise werden solche Sachen bei automatischen Suchen aufgespürt, hier aber leider nicht. 

In jedem Fall gut, dass du es gefunden hast!

Gruss, Limes
user_581304 (2020-08-12 20:36:12+00:00): Hallo Limes,
jetzt ist an der Stelle ein orangenes Rechteck und keine Verbindung mehr. Wird das zu einem späteren Zeitpunkt eingearbeitet? Noch eine Frage. Ist es möglich, Fotos als Beweis von einer Stelle hochzuladen?
Viele Grüße, Oliver
limes11 (2020-08-12 21:15:13+00:00): Das orangene Rechteck markiert nur dein Changeset, wenn du diese Diskussion hier schliesst, sollte das verschwinden. Das ist nicht in der Karte. 
Die Verbindung kommt schon noch, Änderungen werden nicht live in der Karte angezeigt, das kann zwischen ein paar Minuten und einigen Tagen dauern, je nach Zoomstufe.
Fotos als Beweis fuer Aenderungen in einem changeset sind unüblich. In Notes werden oft Links zu Fotos verwendet, die dann anderswo gespeichert sind. Es ist aber immer gut, ein Foto zu machen, falls jemand (aus welchen Gründen auch immer) Zweifel an der Änderung hat. Das kommt aber selten vor. In dem speziellen Fall ist klar, dass der letzte Bearbeiter vor 3 Monaten einen Rechtschreibfehler eingebaut hatte, die Brücke war zuvor jahrelang ordentlich eingetragen. Hier braucht man kein Foto. 

Gruss, Limes
FransWillem (2020-08-15 09:17:16+00:00): Hello. Please do not map from Bing Imagery
See the instructions. 
This is a former refugee camp what is demolisched after 2017
Bing is from 2013 -2016 so it shows still the buildings.
MAXAR is more recent and shows no buildings anymore
I remove your mappings here
Sorry, it is as it is.
parsd51 (2020-08-13 13:14:39+00:00): Hej STV87

Her kommer mit input til tagning.

For mig består et "teater" af: Scene, bænke/stole til publikum, teknik og hvad der ellers hører til et "teater".
Så jeg vil tagge området med "teater" og de enkelte dele med det de er.
Navne er kun til egentlige navne, f.eks. "teater"s navn.

Her findes forskellige varianter af "teater":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=music%20venue?uselang=da

Lige for at sikre en ting: Vi tagger de korrekte data, hvordan det vises eller ikke vises er op til den enkelte rederer (apps, web-sider etc.)

Hilsen
parsd51
parsd51 (2020-08-13 13:33:59+00:00): renderer ikke rederer :-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 14:51:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2689085481/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this edit
Would it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )
Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house )

Something else?
sorcrosc (2020-08-12 22:00:44+00:00): Ciao. Il lago era già mappato. Per favore elimina quello che hai aggiunto ed eventualmente correggi le etichette su quello preesistente.

Lorenzo
user_5359 (2020-08-13 04:20:59+00:00): Hello! Please don't mark the whole property (https://www.osm.org/way/836583821) as building. Only mark the building as building.
seattlefyi (2020-08-13 00:31:43+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Thanks for the edit -- I add a lot of benches too. It looks like you added a rectangle you tagged as a park, but the area is already Forest Ridge Park, so it's not needed. I'd suggest you delete the tiny park area you created; since you mentioned a bench, create a single node tagged as a bench, then place that at the bench's position on the map. Let me know if you have questions! Thanks again.
Hans Thompson (2020-08-13 15:39:31+00:00): This business has already been added.
Hans Thompson (2020-08-13 15:40:21+00:00): It is the Alaska Rock Gym directly north of this point.
habi (2020-08-25 07:41:56+00:00): Please don't add descriptive names to the things you are tracing. 'building=yes' is sufficient, 'name=building' is superfluous.
Happy mapping!
habi (2020-08-25 07:42:53+00:00): Please don't add descriptive names to the things you are tracing. 'building=yes' is sufficient, 'name=building' is superfluous.
Happy mapping!
habi (2020-08-24 11:22:57+00:00): Please don't add 'name=building' to the buildings you're drawing.
Adding 'building=yes' is good enough!
skquinn (2020-08-12 23:00:44+00:00): Oops, imagery used was Mapbox Satellite
SomeoneElse (2020-08-13 00:22:51+00:00): Hello,
My understanding is that the "EH" ISO code that you've added here applies to he former state of Western Sahara, not the territory held by the Polisario Front, which is what you've added it to. I believe that I remember reading somewhere that both SADR and Morocco applied to use EH and both were denied (but I can't currently find a source for that).
Best Regards,
Andy
wille (2020-08-13 10:10:52+00:00): Thanks Andy,

I moved the codes to the label of "Western Sahara" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89349158
SomeoneElse (2020-08-13 11:56:31+00:00): Thanks - the territory of the "Official full territory as recognized by United Nations" is also in OSM at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2559126 (and already has the tag).
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-27 19:31:43+00:00): I just added the code for the second time (and reverted myself).

I opened https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:ISO_3166-2#Is_EH_code_referring_to_currently_existing_entity%3F_Or_only_to_defunct_country%3F in hope of tracking down some sources
SomeoneElse (2021-09-27 19:45:44+00:00): Hmm - maybe I was misremembering what I'd seen at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.eh (note - that's for the ccTLD .eh, _not_ the ISO3166-1:alpha2 code EH).
We'll see what people say at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:ISO_3166-2#Is_EH_code_referring_to_currently_existing_entity%3F_Or_only_to_defunct_country%3F .  I'm guessing that the answer will be effectively the same.  See also https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-8-2017-007241_EN.html for another source that takes it as read that "EH" applies to the whole of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2559126 , not just https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5441968 .
user_5359 (2020-08-13 04:16:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node.
swiftlighting (2020-08-13 00:37:12+00:00): Not exactly. According to Google, the City of Merritt stretches into Highway 97C towards Lower Nicola, but when I googled the provincial Letters Patent that area belongs to the Electoral Area "N". Seen on page 2 here https://tnrd.civicweb.net/document/86367. I am trying to close this border and make it accurate as possible. On Open Street Maps this border is called Area M (Beautiful Nicola Valley - North)
user_8334278 (2020-08-13 00:00:10+00:00): this is what i saw when i went there if you do not like it YOU go there.
user_8334278 (2020-08-12 23:59:22+00:00): this is what i saw when i went there if you do not like it YOU go there.
Adam Franco (2020-08-31 22:53:45+00:00): Hi Necessarycoot, I noticed that in a few places such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7808378551 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7808378549#map=20/44.10506/-72.73082 you've added a ford crossing where there is no evidence of a ford (driving through the stream https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dyes ) in the satellite imagery. In this region *most* stream crossings are culverts (metal or concrete tunnels) or bridges and fords are usually only seen on farm/forestry tracks. If you can't determine whether there is a ford, culvert, or a bridge due to tree cover or poor imagery, its better to leave the warning unresolved than add possibly-wrong details.

Thanks, Adam
yadathot (2020-08-13 00:24:25+00:00): Added Services roads as per Private Maxar imagery.
stevea (2020-08-14 04:17:39+00:00): relation/6575987 is not all wooded and is far, far too large (and inaccurate) to represent such a natural landcover.  I have deleted it.

If you wish to map such things, start smaller, be more accurate and don't stop the boundary of a natural at a park or forest boundary:  nature doesn't do that, though sloppy (and wrong) mappers might.
Fluffy89502 (2020-08-14 20:23:46+00:00): Yeah I agree that landcover does not follow borders like that but it takes a lot of time to follow natural boundaries, and as such this is a work in progess. I do not know how to edit along natural lines all at once. You can clearly see that in the north-east park of the wood I have spent time following natural lines while I am yet to get to it in the north-west portion of the same.
stevea (2020-08-14 20:43:08+00:00): A certain amount of "work in progress" is to be expected for such major undertakings.  Doug (user:doug_sfba) and I do this around the southeasterly end of the Santa Cruz Mountains, but we do it "one grove at a time" (if not grove, orchard, or greenhouse_horticulture, farmland...) because in these regards, THE SMALLER and MORE ACCURATE, THE BETTER!

It is actually quite helpful to add a FIXME tag saying "Work in progress; I've only done this up to the edge of the Air Force Base" (for example) so that others know what you are up to.

Go ahead and take your time, even as you realize that to do this right (all over Kern and San Bernardino Counties) is going to take maybe four, six, eight years — Doug and I are in it for the "decade long haul."  Realize that landuse and landcover are two different semantics (e.g. landuse=military and natural=heath or natural=scrub, which results in an unfortunately nauseating pink-and-olive mixed together - ick!)  Just do it in small increments, don't "clobber" over other landuses or landcover as you do (i.e. exclude housing subdivisions, rivers, exceptional landscapes like mountain slopes...) and follow the rules of good polygon construction, please!  One of the most important things to do is use JOSM if editing multipolygons (it is the ONLY way to do it, imo) and always click the "sort relation" button (in the relation editor) before you close the relation and ALWAYS clean up any Validator plug-in Errors (and Warnings, too) regarding any multipolygons.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
user_5359 (2020-08-13 04:13:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!

And we have a key addr:housenumber...
Josef K (2020-08-28 20:16:56+00:00): Reverti este changeset. "access=no", mesmo com "motor_vehicle=yes", é uma tag muito restritiva que raramente se deve usar, menos ainda em vias estruturantes como IC 2.

A alternativa nestes casos é usar a tag "motorroad=yes".

A menos que se esteja muito seguro do que se está a fazer, alterações profundas deste tipo é boa ideia consultar a comunidade (grupo telegram ou mailing list) antes.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:13:54+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
rab (2020-08-13 16:57:25+00:00): Hello, could you please tell me why you choose this project? And why did you draw these ugly polygons over existing passable data?
user_5359 (2020-08-15 04:59:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What ist the meaning of the key niu0812?
Khiva12 (2020-10-15 04:53:32+00:00): Hi Piedrraa, I noticed you created several park features in the Colinas del Aeropuerto neighborhood, but I’m not seeing any evidence of these existing. Would you be able to share where you found resources for these parks?
trigpoint (2020-08-13 14:18:00+00:00): Hi Mario
This edit is incorrect. The object here is the AONB, not The Forest of Bowland which this wikidata/wikipedia tags you added refer to.
As far as I am aware the AONB does not have a wikidata item but please do not add incorrect information just because it is a similar name.

This edit should be reverted.

Cheers Phil
mario947 (2020-08-26 14:32:46+00:00): Hi Phil, 

Thanks for reviewing this.
According to Wikidata "Forest of Bowland AONB" and "Forest of Bowland" are the same thing: 
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1406920

Please let me know if I got it wrong so I'll revert this back.

Thanks,
Mario
FransWillem (2020-08-19 11:19:37+00:00): Subject: Hidden already mapped buildings in iDeditor

Hello. Thank you for mapping out this project.
Due to a problem in iDeditor, many buildings/roads are currently drawn double or triple.
Cause is an error in IDeditor which causes the already drawn buildings to remain invisible.
Note the bottom line in iDeditor. There's a blue field in there that says ... If you have hidden objects, you need to zoom in further. It may happen that the field does not disappear.  Then find another task to work on.

See this picture
![hidden features] (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yoGFziHyq49yKKqKbu81mefyBQZ6TqPH/view?usp=sharing)
Glassman (2020-08-14 23:29:32+00:00): Tip: If the objects don't align with the image - check to make sure the imagery is properly aligned. On the right hand side of the imagery there is a tool to adjust the imagery offset as well as look for better imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89330119
BenBaldwin19 (2020-08-14 23:33:11+00:00): Hey Glassman! Thanks for the tip. Was there a specific way you were concerned with?
Glassman (2020-08-14 23:36:04+00:00): I didn't see any specific problem. When I see a new mapper move objects, I suspect that the imagery may not be aligned properly. If you look through the various sources, none of them exactly match the other. Plus the imagery is gets updated. What could have been perfect before is now off slightly.
ZeLonewolf (2020-08-21 02:13:29+00:00): Hi - this changeset removed large parts of the boundaries of Falls Church and several surrounding towns, so I reverted the change.

I recommend jumping on Slack (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Slack_workspaces) for help with editing boundaries.  In general, you should be using JOSM and not the web-based editor for more complex edits.
Frans S (2020-08-13 13:18:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please pay attention on the issue triangle on the right side menu

Subject: Hidden already mapped buildings in iDeditor

Due to a problem in iDeditor, many buildings/roads are currently drawn double or triple.
Cause is an error in IDeditor which causes the already drawn buildings to remain invisible.
Note the bottom line in iDeditor. There's a blue field in there that says ."hidden objects".. If you have hidden objects, you need to zoom in further. It may happen that the field does not disappear.  Then find another task to work on.

See this picture
![hidden features] (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yoGFziHyq49yKKqKbu81mefyBQZ6TqPH/view?usp=sharing)