piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
whb (2016-07-19 10:32:07+00:00): Vermutlich fehlt bei Wildbahn-Schnise ein "e"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70309773
Supaplex (2016-07-17 03:45:53+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-07-17 05:26:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: You forgot to add any information to your node.
CJTmmr (2016-08-15 09:44:11+00:00): If you add links to an intersection, please also set the "lanes" and "turn:lanes"-tags accordingly,  And remember: BING is often outdated! You cannot always set turn:lanes from BING-images.Please do a survey first. Thanks CJT
GerdP (2017-09-01 05:54:20+00:00): Hi!
Please review unusal highway=bus_lane on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431384284
I suggest to remove it and add lanes:bus=1
to the major road.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
GerdP (2017-09-01 05:56:21+00:00): Since there are so many relations you may also just change it to highway=service + access=no + psv=yes if that is apropriate.
muralito (2016-07-19 02:46:59+00:00): ¿Este sigue sion tener salon, no?
user_5359 (2016-07-17 05:23:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your business see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop, please.
Jojo4u (2016-08-18 22:14:29+00:00): Sehr schön dass die NT-Radwg Umleitung getaggt ist.
Ich habe noch ein paar Details (Bilder von hier https://sharadspaceblog.wordpress.com/2016/08/03/fuer-die-einen-ist-es-strassenmalerei-fuer-die-anderen-ein-radfahrstreifen/) getaggt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41545321
Jojo4u (2016-08-18 22:18:08+00:00): Außerdem sind mir folgende Details aufgefallen: 
1. Zeichen 240 daneben obwohl Führung mit Radstreifen auf Straße = Konflikt Benutzungspflicht. Gibt es die 240er Schilder noch? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118961532#map=18/48.76366/9.26488&layers=CN

2. Führung NT-Radweg entgegen Einbahnstraße, wahrscheinlich auf Gehweg. Sollte durch sidewalk:bicycle=yes und am besten auch noch oneway_bicycle=no angezeigt werden https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431444785

3. Straße lcn=yes (auch Relation) obwohl Weg mit Zeichen 240 (onway=no) danaben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237155758
Jojo4u (2016-08-18 22:20:46+00:00): Die neuen Radstreifen sind wohl nur Schutzstreifen, die macht man durch cycleway:both:traffic_sign=DE:340 kenntlich (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren)
Constable (2016-07-17 09:58:28+00:00): why the hell did you add the japanese translation to the main name? This bridge is in Italy and then it's name must be Italian, end of the story.
Japanese translation has already been added using "name:ja" tag.
As mapsme user you have to understand that you're editing a stand alone map that was being updated only by it's community before mapsme was released and then a lot of users with no map knowledge started messing things up.
I'll remove "嘆息橋" from the name as it makes no sense.
muralito (2016-07-18 01:53:15+00:00): Hola VairoDante.
alpine_hut es para refugio de montaña.
Un apart es tourism=apartment
Ver http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dapartment
VairoDante (2016-07-18 19:49:38+00:00): Como hago para editar el lugar.?
muralito (2016-07-18 20:51:38+00:00): Con el MAPS.ME no se porque no lo uso.
pero vas al sitio www.openstreetmap.org pones tu usuario y te habilita un boton "editar" bien arriba a la izquierda.
Ahi tambien podes agregarle los datos de contacto.
Arunasank (2016-07-17 04:37:50+00:00): Oh no, old changeset comment is stuck to this one. Adding some basic POIs in Lalgudi.
carciofo (2016-10-07 12:31:58+00:00): Hi Joshua, thanks for your contributions! Just wanted to let you know that your changes popped up on data quality tools mostly because the pedestrian crosswalks you added do not intersect the highways they cross. This is a problem because the intersection node also needs to be tagged as a crossing for drivers, and because routing engines for walking directions need these intersections. Lastly, please note that when you use the disconnect feature at an intersection in iD, all ways connected at the node will be disconnected. To disconnect select both the node and the way you want to disconnect, and then apply the disconnect action. Should you have any questions, don't hesitate to get in touch. Cheers!
maraf24 (2016-07-17 08:44:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4306954792
Not a hotel.
Arunasank (2016-07-17 06:00:05+00:00): Melukote ^ wrong changeset comment.
joost schouppe (2017-01-05 07:57:23+00:00): Hi Guillermo,
Thanks for adding these places!
Are they both really called Furgoperfecto? That seems odd.
It's also always practical to add more info to the caravan sites, like if you have to pay an access fee, or which services are available.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 10:29:50+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431488571/history has access:foot = yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using foot access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/foot/&***/access%3Afoot/
muralito (2017-03-14 17:53:25+00:00): La velocidad maxima para la aproximacion a la rotonda probablemente no sea 120, no es logico.
literan (2016-07-17 12:57:08+00:00): Ни одной правильной правки, один мусор. Откатываю.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-06-17 08:36:12+00:00): Hi, this pub looks misplaced. Was it ever here somewhere?
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-21 05:30:07+00:00): With http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431490830 I dropped it to landuse=commercial only, so that the individual buildings inside of it wouldn't overlap.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-17 11:21:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 40066399.
letihu (2016-08-06 18:58:05+00:00): Bänke werden 
amenity:bench
gemappt ;-)
Marmo4D (2016-08-06 19:48:41+00:00): Ups ... danke für die Korrektur. Das war wohl ein Moment geistiger Umnachtung.
Durko_freemap (2016-07-18 07:47:18+00:00): Zdravim Lukas,
1.) poprosim Vas nepouzivajte vseobcne nazvy (napr. MŠ, Hasiči, ...)
2.) toto (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4307003595) by zrejme malo byt (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dtownhall) a nie (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre) a tag name vymazte
3.) tu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4307024389 & https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4307002796) by bolo vhodne doplnit tag operator= (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:operator), aby bolo jasne ktorej banke patria
Vdaka za opravy a doplnenia. Durko
kayle (2016-07-18 08:23:29+00:00): A tiež nemocnica https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4307003593 nebude skôr zdravotné stredisko?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dclinic
dieterdreist (2016-07-18 11:59:39+00:00): Is this really a villa_rustica site? From the italian wikipedia article, first sentence, it doesn't seem so: "La villa del Casale è un edificio abitativo tardo antico, popolarmente definito villa nonostante non abbia i caratteri della villa romana extraurbana ..."
Aury88 (2016-07-18 12:29:04+00:00): effettivamente ha più le caratteristiche di un palazzo urbano imperiale, non propriamente di una villa, anche se lo scopo era identico e le differenze sembrerebbero dovute ad un particolare livello di benessere del proprietario (insomma la villa di un ricco che ha voluto strafare). esiste per questo genere di edifici un tag appropriato?
ps: eviterei di aggiungere anche il tag fixme per questo genere di commenti, i commenti ai  changeset sono fatti proprio  per questo. il tag fixme vuol dire secondo me che si è certi della necessità del cambiamento quindi perchè chiedere anche nel changeset?
dieterdreist (2016-07-18 13:25:27+00:00): ho messo il fixme, perché non potevo guardare lo storico (al inizio, problema del server, nemmeno in JOSM funzionava ctrl+h), e se tu non avessi risposto avremmo comunque avuto una nota per il prossimo che ci va (non ci sono andato e non sapevo per certo se il mio commento era pertinente).

Per me i fixme sono utili per non perdere di vista i dubbi. Essendo direttamente legati all'oggetto sono molto probabilmente guardati da chi tocca questo oggetto la prossima volta, mentre i changeset comments non hanno questo stretto legame al singolo oggetto.

Per il tag: non esiste, ma lo puoi inventare. Se non lo fai te, mancera anche al prossimo ;-)
Suggerisco la lista tagging.
Aury88 (2016-07-18 17:59:34+00:00): ok, tutto chiaro. Grazie!
Supaplex (2016-07-17 09:49:58+00:00): 單一的墓用historic=tomb
zarl (2016-07-17 18:56:49+00:00): Immer die blöden Vertipper... gemeint ist der Haderner Weg, also die Verbindungsstrasse von Neuried nach Großhadern.
Jojo4u (2016-07-18 22:40:33+00:00): Hallo m3karte, ich hab deinen Müllcontainer wieder entfernt weil private Container nicht gemappt werden sollen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=waste%20disposal
m3karte (2016-07-24 05:42:39+00:00): Sorry
maraf24 (2016-07-29 13:27:17+00:00): 1. oznaczyłem teren zabudowy jako budynek, tj. dałeś building=house zamiast landuse=residential
2. usunąłeś prawidłowe adresy i wpisałeś je ponownie, ale błędnie i z pominięciem informacji o źródle pochodzenia.

To nie pierwszy taki przypadek z adresami, nie ma potrzeby ich ruszać, bo są z importu i są prawidłowe oraz kompletne.
laznik (2016-07-17 12:32:34+00:00): Dobry den. Okrem tagu highway=track by bolo fajn specifikovat aj aky typ to je, napriklad grade3. Viac info o typoch je tu:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype

vdaka.
zstadler (2023-10-21 12:47:57+00:00): Hello Valdrin,

Over 7 years ago, in this changeset, you have added a "natural=valley" tag to the edge of the Valbona Valley National Park.

According to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dvalley
a "natural=valley" way should be drawn along the valley bottom, not its edge.

Perhaps https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241408888 is more appropriate for 
a "natural=valley" tag.

Would you agree that the "natural=valley" tag be removed from
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354315205
Hjart (2016-07-17 12:16:20+00:00): Hej
jeg har sat nogen relevante tags på de pladser du har lavet i dag. Tak for dine bidrag.
yongjhih (2016-07-19 03:33:20+00:00): 文青路的部份這幾天已經改道，我已再修正
assanges (2016-07-21 13:34:09+00:00): 了解、最近沒走青山路、謝謝修正
assanges (2016-07-21 13:40:53+00:00): 補充：青山路二段自105年7月16日起改道
For more info about temporary traffic arrangement on Wenqing Rd and Qingshan Rd, see (Chinese only): http://www.tyhp.gov.tw/newtyhp/cht/index.php?code=list&flag=detail&ids=131&article_id=99410
maraf24 (2016-07-29 13:29:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431506915
To nie jest budynek, adres jest nieprawidłowy.
Fadlilaa IRM-RV (2020-08-25 00:45:26+00:00): I did smoothing on your work based on Maxar Premium Imagery in this changeset and around it. Thankyou...
j-wills (2016-09-30 17:25:09+00:00): Названия магазинов? Время работы ? Контакты?
keithonearth (2017-04-14 20:55:27+00:00): "thang" is a suffices that indicates a plataux or plane in Tibetan and Ladakhi, this is an odd name for such a minor crag. Also tagging it as a peak does not seem very accurate, as it is a small hill within a valley.
freebeer (2019-11-08 07:06:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76789584 where the changeset comment is: personal private info maps.me bogus viewpoint
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2019-10-15 06:26:33+00:00): Hi. You added `irish=yes` as a tag to the irish pub https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431512698#map=19/51.45379/-2.59323 ( Seamus O'Donnell's ). I've changed that to `theme=irish`
PlaneMad (2016-07-17 12:26:18+00:00): This is amazing, nice work!
MKnight (2016-08-01 19:05:56+00:00): Öffnungszeiten sind unvollständig, kannst Du das korrigieren?
*Martin* (2016-09-13 18:16:34+00:00): Hello

Probably after your update the blue hiking route is forked. Please see http://www.freemap.sk/#p=49.16979|20.26859|15|T. What should be the proper state?
tbedrich (2016-09-14 13:08:55+00:00): Hello, thanks for your notice. I have already fixed it.
d3d9 (2016-07-17 12:40:26+00:00): Als Wert für network sollte man VRR statt den ausgeschriebenen Namen verwenden.

Bitte korrigiere das bei den Halten wo du bis jetzt die Edits gemacht hast.

Mehr dazu hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/VRR_Tagging#Route
Jojo4u (2016-07-17 13:11:49+00:00): Hätte ich mir denken können dass du schneller bist als ich ;)
maxbritov (2016-07-22 20:42:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40960013 where the changeset comment is:
chnav (2016-07-18 08:46:40+00:00): удалено
user_5359 (2016-11-12 16:08:07+00:00): Hello! Short question to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4307293565 : shop=gift oder shop=candles ?
PSR-2 (2016-11-12 21:07:37+00:00): J'ai changé pour "décoration intérieure", en accord avec leur site et avec ce qu'ils vendent effectivement.
I have change for "interior decoration" according to their website and what they sell.
Supaplex (2016-07-17 14:16:02+00:00): Don't just add another language name in the name field, add the corresponding English name in the English name field
mapper999 (2016-07-25 20:37:34+00:00): Please do not add this nonsense data. It's a game and not real!
Hjart (2016-07-17 14:26:42+00:00): Der er specielle tags for sådan nogen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Darchaeological_site
trigpoint (2016-07-17 15:16:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. I am assuming that there isn't a postbox here but a bollard. Please could you confirm?

Thanks Phil
kayle (2016-07-19 12:17:21+00:00): Zdravím,
do názvu prosím nepísať všeobecné názvy ako "cintorín", "materská škola" ale vlastné ako napr, "Nový horný cintorín" alebo "Materská škola Janka Hraška". Samozrejme ak taký názov existuje. Ak nie, tak nechať prázdne.
Tiež je zhoda napísať "Kostol Krista Krala (kat.)" ale len "Krista Kráľa" a označiť typ budovy ako building=church.
Ďalej (kat.) ako katolícky sa značí ako samostatná značka "religion"
Viď http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:building%3Dchurch a http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:religion
Dávanie POI ako bod a zároveň na budovu tiež nie je odporúčané (viď pošta)
A na koniec, prosím dodržiavať zápis ako je v skutočnosti = písať aj dĺžne a mäkčene a písať v lokálnom jazyku. Ak treba dajú sa použiť aj iné jazyky, viac http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names
.
V prípade otázok k mapovaniu radi pomôžeme/poradíme  na https://groups.google.com/group/osm_sk/
Constable (2016-07-22 08:19:54+00:00): Are you sure this name is correct? "Scuola elementaria" menas nothing in Italian. "Scuola Elementare" should be the right name instead.
Ales Horak (2016-07-17 14:27:58+00:00): Wrong comment, sorry. A correct one is "adding more details about the viewpoint."
Graf Westerholt (2017-01-07 10:23:54+00:00): Beim Lidl an der Hausackerstraße fehlt das PH bei den Öffnungszeiten.
surveyor54 (2017-01-20 16:01:20+00:00): Ich konnte gestern dort kein Schild mit "Bismarckturm Schotten" entdecken, lediglich ein Schild "Bismarckturm"
kräckel (2017-01-21 19:27:46+00:00): Es gibt viele Bismarktürme, siehe
http://www.bismarcktuerme.de/ebene4/hessen/schotten.html
oder
http://www.historic.place/themes/Bismarckturm/index.html?detail=3
Grüße Kräckel
SomeoneElse (2016-07-22 08:58:03+00:00): Hi,
This is a large changeset (by area) and "fix Duplicated geometry and tags" doesn't explain what you actually changed or where.  It'd be really helpful to other mappers if you could restrict the size of the changesets that you're making, and explain what you are actually changing - describe it in terms of physical features (perhaps "two overlapping buildings had been added to OSM, I removed the one that didn't match the imagery" rather than "fix Duplicated geometry and tags").
Best Regards,
Andy
user_870861 (2016-07-22 12:21:36+00:00): using osmose and josm, i miss to upload between to issues..
for the explanation : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/botdidier2020
SomeoneElse (2016-07-22 17:08:06+00:00): In each changeset can you please explain what geographical features you actually changed, why, and based on what source. 
Thanks,
Andy
user_870861 (2016-07-23 05:22:24+00:00): i don't unterstand.why and source.
you can help me by an example? 

french:
effacement des way/nodes dupliqués 
(meme description géométrique et tags).
why : ?
source ?

cordialement
didier
user_870861 (2016-07-23 06:01:43+00:00): something like that :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40964862
SomeoneElse (2016-07-24 10:07:33+00:00): Re http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164815873/history en http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40964862 que diriez-vous:
"Suppression de 2 lignes électriques à Marlborough, Massachusetts qui étaient des répliques exactes des autres ajoutées par le même mappeur en même temps, par exemple, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164815873/history que exactement dupliqués https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161617009/history."

Dans les cas où le mappeur est toujours actif (comme ici) Je voudrais aussi commenter le changeset qui a introduit les doublons (ici http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/11689443 ).


Re http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164815873/history in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40964862 how about:
"Removed 2 power lines in Marlborough, Mass that were exact duplicates of others added by the same user at the same time.  For example,  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164815873/history that exactly duplicated https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161617009/history ."
In cases where the mapper is still active (as here) I'd also comment on the changeset that introduced the duplicates (here http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/11689443 ).
richlv (2016-07-17 18:11:13+00:00): is there really a nightclub here ? got any references ?
Владимир К (2017-04-04 13:16:13+00:00): а зачем в названия дублировать высоту вершин?
chihchun (2018-05-23 15:49:11+00:00): 披著狼皮的羊貌似蜂類的食蚜蠅
是真的有這個告示看牌嗎？
Supaplex (2018-05-24 04:40:47+00:00): 陽明山國家公園解說牌
chihchun (2018-05-24 04:53:20+00:00): 這個 name tag 命名太長，影響地圖顯示。是否可以移動到 description?
chihchun (2018-05-24 04:54:06+00:00): 另外還有
* 二子坪與大屯自然公園一帶  - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4307478852
* 明山的植物北降現象 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4307478853
* 眺望百拉卡山與葉公坑山 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4307478835
* 敬告 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4307478834
Viajero Perdido (2016-09-01 20:40:15+00:00): So with this changeset you deleted a hand-edited Blaeberry Road (by me, and which still exists beyond the washout), and also deleted hand-edited streams and glaciers (by Sundance, attributed to Mapbox, for example 379470433), to replace them with inaccurate CanVec versions?!?

I've earlier flagged the missing road portions with OSM Notes.  It's still there, and knowing where to aim would help a hiker; I personally took the wrong quad trail when I didn't know where to aim to find the road.

Please, can you stop doing this?
huaraz (2016-09-02 03:00:13+00:00): Deletion of the Blaeberry Road was totally unintentional. I will investigate how that happened and hopefully I can restore or fix the deletion. I don't delete roads when I import CanVec, so I'm surprised to see the change set deleted section of the road that were originally created 6 years ago. The deletion/replacement of the stream and glaciers was intentional, I made a judgment call to use the CanVec data. I understand you disagree, I don't remember this specific features, but I checked the satellite images and history to determine what to do. I do remember leaving the Wapta alone.
huaraz (2016-11-12 04:44:01+00:00): Restored the Blaeberry Road section deleted by Changeset: 40800657.
Hjart (2016-07-17 16:24:26+00:00): Der er en Gorm's node få meter mod vest, så jeg tror lige jeg ruller denne ændring tilbage
Commodoortje (2016-07-17 20:22:20+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  changeset gerevert. Adresnode was al aanwezig. Gelieve niet toevoegen omdat het kan, dit schaadt de OSM kaart in ernstige vorm. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-17 19:15:27+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 40195731.
Supaplex (2016-07-18 09:11:37+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
surveyor54 (2016-07-22 16:33:18+00:00): Hallo,
ich würde diese Ver- u. Entsorgungsstation nicht als Toilette taggen, sondern:

amenity=sanitary_dump_station
fee=no
sanitary_dump_station:chemical_toilet=yes
sanitary_dump_station:gray_water=yes
water_point=yes
description= Ver- u. Entsorgungsstation für Wohnwagen u. Wohnmobile
streckenkundler (2016-07-22 16:49:42+00:00): Hei,

ich bin mir nicht sicher, was hier 100%ig korrekt ist... Ich muß mal bei Gelegenheit vorbeifahren... Ich hatte mit zunächst an das vorgefundene gehalten, aber stimmt, eine Toilette mit zusätzlicher Entsorgungsmöglichkeit ist das nicht, sondern eine reine Entsorgung...

anscheinend hinkt Wiki und JOSM-Vorlagen etwas hinterher.

Hab das Tagging angepasst...
Danke,

Sven
surveyor54 (2016-07-22 16:54:11+00:00): Diesen Link wollte ich eigentlich noch dran hängen:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dsanitary_dump_station
streckenkundler (2016-07-22 18:46:21+00:00): Ah... jetzt kommt es mir wieder ein... das ist doch recht frisch...

Nun... ich werde mal beim Campingplatz bei Gelegenheit vorbeiradeln... heute oder morgen wird es nicht... 

Sven
ToniE (2016-07-18 09:14:56+00:00): Hallo gekapes,

das war schon mit maxweight:conditional = no @ (destination) gemapped und hätte dann als hgv=destination (statt =private) gemapped werden sollen.

Gruß
Toni
jeka p (2016-07-18 18:13:08+00:00): Hallo Toni,

von der Seite Hans-Riedl-Str steht das Verkehrszeichen "LKW verboten" (https://www.wko.at/Content.Node/Service/Verkehr-und-Betriebsstandort/Verkehr-allgemein/Verkehrsrecht/LKW_Fahrverbote_in_Oesterreich_Ueberblick.html) mit "Anrainer frei". Maxweight 2.8 steht von der Seite nicht. 
Wie ich sehe, wurde die wiki Seite (Punkt access=private) inzwischen geändert (see ältere Version).
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Key:access&oldid=1198239

===> das bedeutet, dass "Anlieger/Anrainer frei" wieder vehicle=private ist.

ein Durcheinander in der wiki.

Maxweight 2.8 sollte jemand prüfen.

Gruss,
Jeka
ToniE (2016-07-18 19:12:48+00:00): Danke Jeka,
das mache ich bei Gelegenheit dann mal.
Gruß
Toni
ToniE (2016-07-20 05:22:05+00:00): Hallo Jeka,

habe ich gestern Abend gepüft:
"LKW Anlieger frei", sonst nichts (außer "30 km/h".

hgv=destination; maxweight=7.5; maxweight:conditional=no @ (destination)

gemäß http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Win32netsky

und

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland

Gruß
Toni
jeka p (2016-07-20 16:00:53+00:00): Hallo Toni,

danke.
maxweight 7.5t habe dort ich nicht bemerkt...

Gruss,
Jeka
ToniE (2016-07-20 16:13:59+00:00): Hallo Jeka,

ist dort auch nicht vorhanden.
Ich hab's grad nach 3.5t geändert, da

traffic_sign=DE:265 3.5t impliziert, laut

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland
Gruß,
Toni
SomeoneElse (2016-07-24 10:41:59+00:00): Hi, 
The LBS is already mapped (as two amenity=university buildings http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9799522 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8076186 ).  I've removed this node.
If there's a problem with it not appearing on some map or app, I'd raise that with whoever maintains that.
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this; just trying to help.  Any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Cheers,
Andy