piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-06-14 20:47:45+00:00): Soms zie je bij grote bedrijven de naam ook wel op het vlak van het terrein staan .. bv op man_made=works name=... Dan heb je niet overal die namen staan.
Eggie
MarkJor (2020-06-14 20:47:49+00:00): Al doende leert men. Ik zal het aanpassen
geri-oc (2020-06-16 09:05:31+00:00): Statt area=yes an der Treppe einzutragen sollte area:highway=steps mit dem Treppenweg eingetragen werden:
"area:highway=steps	area	steps midline: highway=steps, for direction rendering tagged with incline=up and incline=down." und mehr
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area
pio2_122 (2020-06-14 20:16:03+00:00): Przesuwanie adresów w pole nie ma nic wspólnego z dodawaniem drogi polnej...
Wycofane.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86634373
tekim (2020-06-17 21:16:49+00:00): Hello again,
Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6166430, where does the name "Glade Road" come from?  I have been around this area for over ten years and have never heard of that private track called this.  There is a "Glade Road" some miles east of here however (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6165231). I am also not familiar with the name "Main Way", nor FS 405. Track in question is not even in Larimer County E911 roads data, so presumably they don't have a name for it. According to Larimer County parcel data, it is almost entirely on private land (except for about 100 yards on its western end), and there is also a gate and sign on its eastern end that it is private, so I would think access=private.
rsavoye (2020-06-17 21:26:07+00:00): I updated my copy of the USDA "Road Core", and that has both the name and the ref:usfs. I'm not in Larimer County, so you probably know better till I can get up that. There's many USFS roads that cross private property, so that's not an issue. But I can't tell the access unless I was there. "Main Way" was what it was named, so I made it an alt_name.
tekim (2020-06-17 22:54:11+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply.  Where can I get this "USDA Road Core" dataset?  Is it here: https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?dsetCategory=transportation? - or is that something else?

It will probably come as no surprise to you that the further one gets away from the local level, the worse the government data gets.  For example, I looked at 140 named bodies of water in the Big Thompson Watershed from the USGS National Hydragraphy Dataset (NHD) and found 13 errors.

I wish we had a contact at the local level for the Forest Service whom we could raise questions like this.  Perhaps I will make some calls.

I am not familiar with access=service (but then again, there are a lot of things I am not familiar with).  I assume that you, as a fire fighter, can access just about anywhere in your area of service in the event of an emergency, even if "private" (perhaps the only exception might be a military installation, which would have its own fire department).
rsavoye (2020-06-17 23:11:59+00:00): Tell me about it, I have multiple other public domain datasets, and sometimes none of then agree. I wrote software that compares all the datasets and makes an educated guess.
The USGS topo map also calls it Glade Road. so it got two votes. That's the right link, data updated a few weeks ago, and getting better. I only added the name, can't vouch for the other tags. "Main Way" didn't sound quite right to be honest. and it was a name_1 anyway. it's marked access=service as it's only for service or emergency vehicles. In an emergency. we go anywhere we want if it's necessary.

I do know the GIS person for Arapaho Roosevelt National Forest, not sure if she'd know anything more than what's in the dataset.
tekim (2020-06-18 00:03:39+00:00): It is great that you wrote some software to do that compare.  I have been thinking about doing something like that to compare OSM trails with COTREX trails (once I get permission to use COTREX in OSM).  COTREX has some errors, but the comparison will be a good place start for further research.

I must be missing something (which is very possible).  I downloaded the USDA road data from the link and I am not seeing the track in question in that data (I just downloaded S_USA.Road_MNUM.shp - perhaps I need to get all four datasets).  The old USGS topos (scanned image of the paper maps) show the track, but no name for it.
tekim (2020-06-18 00:06:48+00:00): Ok, I think I found the right USDA dataset now.  I am downloading it and will examine later.
rsavoye (2020-06-18 00:12:33+00:00): Road_Core, not MVUM. MVUM is for 4wd_only roads, Road Core is for normal cars. You can grab my converted version here:
https://www.senecass.com/projects/Mapping/SourceData/RoadCore_FS.osm.bz2. It's huge, there's poly files up one level so you can extract just what you want.
pio2_122 (2020-06-14 20:32:19+00:00): Bezpodstawna zmiana. Wycofane.
Następne takie zmiany będą traktowane jako wandalizm.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86634641
RicoElectrico (2020-07-09 00:04:16+00:00): @pio2_122, dlaczego od razu wandalizm? Bardziej nieogarnięcie, choć tak, granic bez celu nie ma co ruszać.

Tu został dodany jeden węzeł (tam "na dole") do granicy, który do tego jest współliniowy z sąsiadami, więc nic nie zmienia....

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=86634641
pio2_122 (2020-07-09 10:44:16+00:00): Wiem, dlatego napisałem "będą traktowane", a nie "traktuję". Ma to związek z poprzednią zmianą zmianą tego usera, gdzie przesunął on adres w pole z opisem "istniejąca droga polna" https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86634373
Praktycznie od razu napisałem komentarz do zmiany, a mimo tego następna zmiana (ta) również była błędna i nie miała nic wspólnego z opisem. Stąd następne takie zmiany będę uznawał jako wandalizm (uważam, że wszystkie przesłanki do tego zostaną wtedy spełnione.)
timmito (2021-02-02 08:02:54+00:00): Hallo, was soll "not exist" für ein Name sein? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306591632
skquinn (2020-09-29 16:57:59+00:00): Names should be capitalized; this was not a misspelling. (It has since been fixed.)
tyndale (2020-06-17 20:38:26+00:00): Hi Alex,
is it really both grass and wood as landuse?
--tyndale
alexkemp (2020-06-18 09:53:05+00:00): Hi *tyndale*
No. It is `landuse=grass` + `natural=wood` as joint tags (sorry, bit pedantic, but accurate).

I cannot recall the precise imagery for this specific junction. Speaking across the whole range of M6 junctions that I mapped that day, they varied from (a couple of sections) that had lots of bush to (almost all) completely forested (the parts closest to the road were tree-free, and these showed the grass; if not maintained in this way then vehicles could have been damaged by tree-limbs).

Away from the immediate motorway were some roundabouts that were grass-only, but it was clear that a policy decision had been taken to allow natural tree-growth around the motorway (and very luxuriant & healthy it looked, too).

If you live locally & know the area to have a different current landuse then please change my mapping. I am unable to visit myself due to Covid-19 lockdown, and of course the imagery that is available to use is often extremely old.
Warin61 (2022-02-10 00:15:42+00:00): Hi,
Pedantic mode engaged... 

Usually the dominate land cover is mapped, so if mostly trees then natural=wood, if mostly grass then landcover=grass (and the ridiculous landuse=grass so it renders).

If both grass and trees must be mapped then we get micro mapping .. So I have made an example change - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13780764
Cascafico (2020-06-15 12:15:56+00:00): Sei sicuro del caravan site? Poco tempo fa ci si parcheggiava anche la auto
ciropom (2020-06-17 15:36:01+00:00): Sicurissimo ci ho parcheggiato col camper (e pernottato) 2 giorni fa
BCNorwich (2020-06-15 06:42:07+00:00): Hi, the address city tag should be addr:city=Oxford not addr:city=Headington, Oxford.
Regards Bernard.
rising-mistake (2020-06-15 08:39:07+00:00): Thanks, I'll change that shortly
BCNorwich (2020-06-15 08:43:09+00:00): Cheers! I've amended a lot but I doubt I've got them all.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2020-06-15 04:46:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse (2020-06-15 12:55:43+00:00): This looks very much like a mechanical edit.  Was it discussed anywhere first?
literan (2020-06-15 16:55:14+00:00): please do not add addr:country tag to objects in Russia. We here in Russia use short address system: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#.D0.A1.D0.BE.D0.BA.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.89.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.BD.D0.B0.D1.8F_.D1.81.D1.85.D0.B5.D0.BC.D0.B0.2C_.D0.B8.D1.81.D0.BF.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.B7.D1.83.D0.B5.D0.BC.D0.B0.D1.8F_.D0.B2_.D0.A0.D0.BE.D1.81.D1.81.D0.B8.D0.B8_.D0.B4.D0.B5-.D1.84.D0.B0.D0.BA.D1.82.D0.BE
sovereign_ch (2020-06-14 23:10:45+00:00): Tramgleise im Strassenplanung sind keine Bahnübergänge. Und hör bitte, auf bei iDs dümmlichem "autocomplete" auf OK zu drücken, der Mist ist inakzeptabel und funktioniert nicht. Wir wenden viel Zeit auf um präzise zu mappen und das kann iD schlicht nicht. Cheers
Paul Matuszyk (2020-06-14 23:15:57+00:00): Ok - this is valid. Sorry for this.
sovereign_ch (2020-06-14 23:05:25+00:00): Wenn es keinen Fussweg hat, dann erfindet man auch keinen. Es motzen schon genug Trolle wegen separat gemappter Trottoirs, dann muss man die nicht noch füttern.
Paul Matuszyk (2020-06-14 23:14:02+00:00): hmm, I am very sorry but it was rude. The path actually exists - it is in front of the build I am in now ;-)
Please be more polite and respectful next time.
Paul Matuszyk (2020-06-14 23:24:14+00:00): please check first couple of seconds of this video: steps and path is there:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlboUQhZ5PM&list=PL2cUlHoGVDZnlL0JKkR62DR-muxRX5q-G&index=24
sovereign_ch (2020-06-14 23:45:52+00:00): I'm a no-nonsense person, and this was rather polite for how I react towards users deciding not to RTFM. So keep it real and please do RTFM: if there is no kerb or physically separate sidewalk on a highway, that's perfectly fine. Don't invent one. If you deem necessary to draw a path around the parking spots, you're welcome. But don't disrespect approved rules, because the separate footway you keep drawing is total BS.
eggie (2020-06-15 04:50:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Tip: Een speeltuintje heeft meestal geen officiële naam. Die kan beter weg. Verder maak je een keuze.. of op het vlak .. of op een node leisure=playground. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-15 06:04:36+00:00): Top!   'k Zie trouwens dat je BING als achtergrond gebruikt.Die ligt behoorlijk verschoven en is verouderd. Beter om PDOK actueel in te stellen. Dat kan in de editmodus ergens rechts in het  scherm.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-15 04:53:39+00:00): Ook hier geen naam svp.. 
In operator zit een spelfout.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-06-15 04:54:27+00:00): Kijk even naar je spelfout gemeentschap
en svp de naam verwijderen
eggie (2020-06-15 04:55:20+00:00): Oke... maar dan nu de node weg.. Niet dubbel mappen.
eggie (2020-06-15 04:58:01+00:00): Ziet er netjes uit. Parkeerplaatsen langs de weg svp niet als amenity=parking taggen. Het zijn geen parkeerterreinen.
Kijk in de wiki bij parking:lane=
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-15 04:58:34+00:00): Oke
eggie (2020-06-15 04:59:57+00:00): Geef concreet aan wat je doet. Naam groenperk eraf halen svp.
Jies voor landuse of voor natural=scrub. Dus kiezen.
Luzandro (2023-04-29 11:35:49+00:00): Hallo,

"UG. [Zubringer Weißenbach]" ist kein Name, ich habe diesen daher wieder entfernt - siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/unbenannte-gerinne/98249/
eggie (2020-06-15 05:01:13+00:00): name-brandgang Julianastraat Oranjestraat verwijderen svp
motor_vehicle=yes?
highkick (2020-06-15 05:25:20+00:00): Had ik al verwijdert en ja autos mogen hier door heen. Het is namelijk niet alleen een brandgang. Het is ook voor als er weg werkzaamheden zijn in de ene helft van de ene straat. dan kan er via de passage men toch de huizen aan de passage met de auto bereiken. Ik weet een beetje veel gedoe maar ja het is zo.
eggie (2020-06-15 06:29:01+00:00): Oke..., maar wanneer dat tijdelijk is zou ik motor_vehicle=yes even weghalen. Het gaat anders routeren voor regulier verkeer. 
Up to  you.
eggie (2020-06-15 05:02:12+00:00): name=oorlogsmonument verwijderen svp. 
Dat zit al in je tagging.
Spanholz (2020-08-04 11:41:20+00:00): Hi,

just saw this single unclassified road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17055976

Why did you change the classification from service to unclassified? And why did you change the access to private?
rsavoye (2020-08-04 13:57:35+00:00): The additional tags added and any changes are based on public domain USDA map data. Access=private does seem potentially wrong, I'll double check. I don't think service is appropriate, note the current long discussion on the tagging list.
SomeoneElse (2021-09-04 10:41:19+00:00): Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.
Can you explain what the source of your change is here?  
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-09-04 10:41:30+00:00): 안녕하십니까,
여기 OSM 데이터 워킹 그룹의 Andy가 있습니다.
여기에 변경의 원인이 무엇인지 설명할 수 있습니까?
친애하는,
앤디
user_6771650 (2020-06-23 16:55:40+00:00): Hello SikeMo,

How have you been able to get the strava heatmap working? Recently the link I was using made it unusable.
user_6771650 (2020-06-23 16:59:05+00:00): It disappears once I zoom in, have you found a way to fix that?
SikeMo (2020-06-23 17:26:35+00:00): https://heatmap-external-{switch:a,b,c}.strava.com/tiles-auth/all/bluered/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png?px=256

Paste this into the map layer and open the heat map on a separate tab. And, no, it isn't available at close zoom levels, which makes it very hard to use.
eggie (2020-06-15 05:02:59+00:00): Oke.. de naam is eraf.. correct.
eggie (2020-06-15 05:03:50+00:00): Netjes zo
JonasCz (2020-07-02 19:29:18+00:00): Salut;

Je vois que t'a changé le nom du village vers "Loubès", au lieu de "Loubès-Bernac". Sur le panneau a coté de la route a l'entreé du village, c'est bien nommé comme Loubès-Bernac. Est-ce que c'etait une erreur, ou t'avais eu une raison pour le faire?

Jonas;
JonasCz (2020-07-02 19:29:56+00:00): (Celui-ci: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/471226418)
Olyon (2020-07-03 09:43:58+00:00): Sur le panneau, le choix a été fait d'indiquer le nom de la commune mais il y a sur la commune 1 village qui s'appelle Loubès et un autre Bernac. Sur le site de la commune https://loubes-bernac.fr/fr/presentation-de-loubes-bernac/ on parle bien du bourg de Loubès et je pense que les habitants font aussi la distinction.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-06-15 04:08:16+00:00): Hiya Viper3321!

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your recent changes.

We define parks in a particular way here, which doesn't include land used for private homes. You can read more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park

The OSM wiki is a great resource if you're unsure how to tag something. If you need any help, please reach out!
eggie (2020-06-15 05:05:17+00:00): Tip  Zet die market_place op een node..
one feature one element..
Flurps (2020-06-15 09:34:34+00:00): Word has it that I can't even spell the name right infront of me either.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 17:39:06+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
eggie (2020-06-15 05:08:47+00:00): Het adres zou ik even van het vlak verwijderen. Er is al een adresnode.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=86638818

Loop je edits nog even na.. Veel tips waren al overbodig, want je hebt ze later gecorrigeerd.
... en geef concreet aan wat je doet.. "vollediger maken" is te vaag. 
Veel plezier met mappen.
MVG,
Eggie
ke9tv (2022-03-13 20:15:30+00:00): This changeset (and the others committed in the area) have a systemic problem with addresses.  Address prefixes and suffixes are stripped from the street names, so that a building that should have the address "332 South Washington Street" shows up with the address "332 Washington".

This abbreviation is not tolerable:  "1234 State Highway 5" shows up as just "1234 5" which is a nonsensical address; "Third Avenue" and "Third Street" are not distinguished. Communities often repeat housenumbers between streets differing only in the direction prefix (301 East Main Street and 301 West Main Street are distinct addresses).

Obviously, with the great data volume, this will need to be repaired with a mechanical edit.  Since I have access to the NYS street and address mapping that you apparently used, I can do the point pairing and override any street names that are unchanged from your import, but I'd appreciate it if you could help me with identifying the scope of the work - how many of these huge changesets are there, and how much of the state do they cover? Does the problem affect all ways imported by `NYBuildings`? Does it extend beyond `NYBuildings` to other import work you may have done?
NYbuildings (2022-03-13 23:45:53+00:00): I'm really sorry for that! Can you give me the exact location? I check several address tags in this changeset north of Little Falls, NY and they seem to be ok.
ke9tv (2022-03-14 00:51:13+00:00): Sure, here are a bunch.  There are so many that it seems to be a systemic issue.

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?q=LyoKVGhpcyBoYcSGYmVlbiBnxI1lcmF0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIG92xJJwxIlzLXR1cmJvIHdpemFyZC7EgsSdxJ9yaWdpbmFsIHNlxLBjaMSsxIk6CsOiwoDCnCJhZGRyOnN0csSMdCJ-xZZNYcS6fFByb3NwZWN0fE1vbnRnb23Eknl8UmFuZHxGaXLFkXxTxaLFp8WzxIPFtsWzRm_EqMScxbRpZsaEU2l4xoRDxIhybGVzfE5ld3TFp3xDxadjb8SxfFdpbHPGmEfFnsShfELEsMS3bsSQcnxKb2huxp_GkcWkxaZyZ8WxfE90xL_FqiQixYjCnQoqLwpbxoJ0OmrGo25dW3RpxazHiToyNV07Ci8vxI_ElMSdciDFk3N1bMa9CigKIMeqxYR5W8WLxY3Fj8WRxZNlxZXFl17FmcWbxZ3Fn8WhxaPFpcWnxanFq8Wtxa_FscaAxbbFuMW6xpzFsnzFvsaexoHGg2jGhcaHyJDGicaLyJDGjcSwxpDGksaUxpbGmMaabsacxp7GoMaixqTGpmXGqMaqxLrGrcavxrHGs1fGtce-xrjGusa8xr5vx4BdKHt7YsSqeH19KceZx6rJgArHmseccMardMehxpHHpMemx4nEmG9keceZPseZyY5za2XEvXF0Ow&c=Aq9HDMUm_O&R
ke9tv (2022-03-14 01:03:44+00:00): Here's a shorter query that also shows the problem. It'll give a false positive on one-word street names like 'Broadway', but those are rare.

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?q=LyoKVGhpcyBoYcSGYmVlbiBnxI1lcmF0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIG92xJJwxIlzLXR1cmJvIHdpemFyZC7EgsSdxJ9yaWdpbmFsIHNlxLBjaMSsxIk6CsOiwoDCnCJhZGRyOnN0csSMdCJ-xZZNYcS6fFByb3NwZWN0fE1vbnRnb23Eknl8UmFuZHxGaXLFkXxTxaLFp8WzxIPFtsWzRm_EqMScxbRpZsaEU2l4xoRDxIhybGVzfE5ld3TFp3xDxadjb8SxfFdpbHPGmEfFnsShfELEsMS3bsSQcnxKb2huxp_GkcWkxaZyZ8WxfE90xL_FqiQixYjCnQoqLwpbxoJ0OmrGo25dW3RpxazHiToyNV07Ci8vxI_ElMSdciDFk3N1bMa9CigKIMeqxYR5W8WLxY3Fj8WRxZNlxZUhxZcgIl0oe3tixKp4fX0px5nHqsiDCseax5xwxqt0x6HGkcekx6bHicSYb2R5x5k-x5nIkXNrZcS9cXQ7&c=Aq-p8Igp4Q&R
ke9tv (2022-03-14 01:05:45+00:00): Plenty of examples in Little Falls, too!

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?q=LyoKVGhpcyBoYcSGYmVlbiBnxI1lcmF0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIG92xJJwxIlzLXR1cmJvIHdpemFyZC7EgsSdxJ9yaWdpbmFsIHNlxLBjaMSsxIk6CsOiwoDCnCJhZGRyOnN0csSMdCJ-xZZNYcS6fFByb3NwZWN0fE1vbnRnb23Eknl8UmFuZHxGaXLFkXxTxaLFp8WzxIPFtsWzRm_EqMScxbRpZsaEU2l4xoRDxIhybGVzfE5ld3TFp3xDxadjb8SxfFdpbHPGmEfFnsShfELEsMS3bsSQcnxKb2huxp_GkcWkxaZyZ8WxfE90xL_FqiQixYjCnQoqLwpbxoJ0OmrGo25dW3RpxazHiToyNV07Ci8vxI_ElMSdciDFk3N1bMa9CigKIMeqxYR5W8WLxY3Fj8WRxZNlxZUhxZcgIl0oe3tixKp4fX0px5nHqsiDCseax5xwxqt0x6HGkcekx6bHicSYb2R5x5k-x5nIkXNrZcS9cXQ7&c=ArCCAh6VEQ&R
ke9tv (2022-03-16 19:22:03+00:00): By the way, I'm not asking you to fix this - just to tell me (a) where you imported the building footprints from, and (b) where you got the address information that you attached to them.  I've not been able to find the data sources unambiguously based on the changeset comments.  I'm pretty confident that I can design a mechanical edit to undo most of the damage, but it would help to know the root cause (and also to know that you're not continuing to install corrupted addresses.  I've found them as recently as  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88825072 - which is over a year old but I see that you haven't done all that much since then.
ke9tv_NYbuildings_repair (2022-03-29 03:15:34+00:00): I've got a repair plan quite far along: https://github.com/kennykb/NYbuildings_repair .  It would help me if you could identify any user ID's other than `miluethi`, `AlexCleary` and `NYbuildings` that you might have used for this activity, so that I can audit their changes as well. You also still have not answered my questions about what data sources you used. Could you please get back to me?
miluethi (2022-03-29 12:58:07+00:00): Hi ke9tv! I apologize for my delayed response, I overlook your previous messages. I think this corrupted address problem is a serious one and thank you for helping and correcting them!

The data source for the address points is from gis.ny.gov and governed by Creative Commons 0 (CC0) (http://gis.ny.gov/gisdata/inventories/details.cfm?DSID=921). I merged them with building footprints with QGis from the same source (sample https://gis.ny.gov/gisdata/inventories/details.cfm?DSID=1343).

I used different ID's and I shared my compiled address point/footprint files with others OSM users. Besides the one you mentioned, I used BobKelly, RobertReynolds, Nia-gara and RickMaldonado. The most time intensive task was to check the footprints on the map with existing building structures and update buildings with address data in (especially) downtown area.

Please feel free to reach out for further questions and if I can help you with the correction, I happy to do so!
ke9tv (2022-03-29 16:54:16+00:00): The data source for building footprints that you cite covers only Lewis County (and does not have parallels for other counties in the state).  Were you perhaps importing from https://cugir.library.cornell.edu/catalog.html?f%5Bdct_isPartOf_sm%5D%5B%5D=Microsoft+Building+Footprints&per_page=100&sort=score+desc%2C+dc_title_sort+asc or http://fidss.ciesin.columbia.edu/building_data_adaptation ?
miluethi (2022-03-29 17:15:53+00:00): It has been a while, but I think, I used CUGIR for the footprints (99% sure). I did not use the Columbia website.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-24 15:28:45+00:00): > Besides the one you mentioned, I used BobKelly, RobertReynolds, Nia-gara and RickMaldonado

Whilst it's OK to use multiple accounts (I use 4 for different things), it's only fair on other OSM contributors to edit the profile of each and make it clear that they're just a "sock puppet" of another user, so that people don't communicate with them thinking they are an unconnected user.