piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2020-08-28 07:07:23+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
Du hast u.a. diesen P-Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573731773/history
mit
highway=service + ..
neu eingezeichnet.
Der Service-Way ist aber nur mit Fußwegen verbunden und damit für PKWs per routing nicht erreichbar.
keep right "fragt" außerdem, ob  der o.g. P-Weg wirklich an diesem Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5509439346
aufhört oder ob vielleicht doch eine Verbindung zu diesem Fußweg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219242389
besteht.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-08-28 07:08:45+00:00): Link zu keep right:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=47.72532&lon=9.22853&zoom=19&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C180%2C191%2C193%2C195%2C196%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C20
PT-53 (2020-08-28 07:11:26+00:00): PS:
Das ist ja ein Fahrradparkplatz.
Da Fahrräder (in OSM) nicht auf Fußwegen fahren dürfen:
Streiche PKWs und setzte Fahrräder ein.
PT-53 (2020-09-06 08:16:00+00:00): Hallo EinEngener, 
Du hast zwischenzeitlich die Wege auf Path abgeändert.
Es wäre schön, wenn Du auch noch die keep right-Hinweise "beinahe Verbindungen" erledigen könntest.
Wiki: Noexit:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:noexit

Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-20 07:47:09+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
die keep right-Hinweise auf Beinaheverbindungen sind leider immer noch da.
Erledigst du das noch?

Fragende Grüße
eggie (2018-03-28 13:24:39+00:00): Willem.. Je kunt deze binnenstraten ook allemaal omtaggen naar highway=residential.... unclassified is nog een erfenis van een donatie door kaartenmaker AND in 2007.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:20:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Warin61 (2018-04-02 00:36:49+00:00): Hi,
You are changing the source of Way: 67803535. Yet you have not changed the tags on the way that say "source"="ABS_2006" and  "attribution"="Based on Australian Bureau of Statistics data". These not are in error ... and should be changed.
Warin61 (2018-04-02 00:42:31+00:00): Err typo ...
'There are now in error ... and should be changed.'
kwametedros (2018-04-02 16:12:31+00:00): Hello, thanks for your comments.  I will change the source info accordingly.
srflp (2018-03-27 22:14:37+00:00): Na tym odcinku jest zakaz jazdy w obu kierunkach, dopuszczający za i wyładunek.
Uważam więc, że highway=pedestrian jest tutaj idealne, ponieważ droga jest przeznaczona głównie dla pieszych.
Supaplex (2019-02-08 16:04:31+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
tuxayo (2021-04-25 20:15:03+00:00): Hi, I'm trying to fix QA issues. Et i'm search if interval=- is valid which was added in this changeset. Do you know what it means?

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#issue_uuid=214b9e3f-b892-764c-7adc-4eba2d68d3c4&zoom=16&lat=43.29712&lon=5.37821
tilsch (2021-04-25 22:50:49+00:00): The idea for this tag was to stress, that this bus route is not in service during the daytime or during the main public transport service hours. In addition the tag interval:evening=x showed, that this bus route is only in service during the late hours.
This change set was created before the interval tag got its wiki page with the current format.
I am using the interval since many years. My proposal was published 2014 on that page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Interval
But it came never to a vote, so another guy posted a proposal for the interval tag in a similar, but slightly different way in 2018:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_transport_schedules/Interval
And in November 2019 this succesful proposal got its own wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:interval
So if you want, you change it to current format. This is unluckily a little bit more complicated, but of course more detailed, because you have to use the opening_hours.
user_5359 (2018-03-28 04:42:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
user_5359 (2018-03-28 04:35:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your objects, please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
johnny_1982 (2018-03-28 22:58:02+00:00): Heißt der Pfad hier (nördlich Riekestraße und Steinhorstwiese) wirklich "Ottenroder Straße" oder ist der Straßenname nicht wirklich viel kürzer (so wie vor deiner Änderung)? So weit im Norden gibt es keine Häuser mehr mit der Adresse "Ottenroder Straße". Die Stadt Braunschweig ist ziemlich konsequent. Die Straßennamen gehen nur so weit wie die Bebauung. Wenn hier nicht ausdrücklich Straßenschilder stehen, ist der Name hier unangebracht. Insbesondere passt es nicht zum amtlichen Stadtplan. Wer die Ottenroder Straße sucht, wird fehlgeleitet.
Ale_Zena_IT (2018-04-03 13:41:49+00:00): Hi, copying from Google is not permitted by Google Term of Service https://www.google.com/intl/en_en/help/terms_maps.html "... Prohibited Conduct. ... use Google Maps/Google Earth to create or augment any other mapping-related dataset (including a mapping or navigation dataset, business listings database, mailing list, or telemarketing list) for use in a service that is a substitute for, or a substantially similar service to, Google Maps/Google Earth; " so we quickly must revert your contribution.
- - - - - - 
Italian version here:
Ciao, non è permesso copiare dati da Google in base ai termini di servizio https://www.google.com/intl/it_it/help/terms_maps.html "... Condotta non consentita.  ... utilizzare Google Maps/Google Earth per creare o integrare altri set di dati correlati alla mappatura (tra cui set di dati per mappatura o navigazione, database di schede di attività commerciali, mailing list o elenchi di telemarketing) da sfruttare per un servizio sostitutivo o sostanzialmente simile a Google Maps/Google Earth;" perciò dobbiamo velocemente eseguire un revert del tuo contributo.
viloan (2018-03-27 22:57:40+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-03-27 22:57:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Aleksandar Matejevic (2019-07-19 08:21:40+00:00): I was looking at High Street, ref:C801. Should the road classification be changed to trunk instead of secondary because it looks like trunk to me and also C754 is set as trunk but it has same class (C)?

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-37.68576268&lng=144.59764168&z=17.536228955699563&focus=photo&pKey=2292vN5DNd79Otbzxup0xQ
GerdP (2018-10-02 08:14:44+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
You mapped some proposed objects here. The normal tagging scheme for a proposed service road is : highway=proposed + proposed=service
For amenities, the prefix proposed is used, e.g. proposed:amenity=parking
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
GerdP (2018-10-13 06:51:04+00:00): I tried to fix some of the problems but I have no idea about the current state. Some ways have a construction=yes tag. Those should be changed to highway=construction + construction=* where * is a place holder for the type of road that is constructed.
pitscheplatsch (2018-03-28 18:21:25+00:00): Hi mrsalmansaeed, welcome to OSM. 

Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57584405
arvdk (2018-03-29 15:56:56+00:00): Hoi Edzo,
Bij deze een aanmoediging om je JOSM Validator te draaien voordat je uploadt. Zie bijvoorbeeld https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5509658982/history (jouw fout) en https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7456378 (niet jouw fout, wel 1 meter naast jou edit). Deze twee puntjes kwam ik toevallig tegen en ik zal ze voor je oplossen.
Groetjes, arvdk
arvdk (2018-03-29 15:59:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5509677502/history - Repareer ik ook voor je.
DannyMcD (2018-03-29 16:16:51+00:00): Hi Undearius,
I'm not sure I like these proposed buildings being tagged as building=proposed - maybe proposed:building = retail would be better?  They show up now (in Mapnik+probably OSMAnd?) as normal buildings. which is confusing, since they aren't actually there.
DannyMcD
Undearius (2018-03-29 16:38:10+00:00): I'll have to agree with you. I was mimicking the tagging for proposed roads and road/buildings under construction . I believe the`proposed:building` style is part of the lifecycle tagging scheme(?). If so, then that's a good recommendation. Also easier to remove the 'proposed:' once they have been constructed.
Alexander-II (2018-03-28 01:17:41+00:00): Правильный комментарий к пакету правки: Монорельс. Добавлены stop_area и stop_area_group.
viloan (2018-03-28 01:21:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GerdP (2018-09-29 08:28:24+00:00): Hi! Please check way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572230198
You connected a highway=steps with
a trunk road (AH2) that has foot=no.
I assume that there is a separate footway next to the trunk road?
SomeoneElse (2018-10-17 17:42:17+00:00): Hi Gerd,
According to https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/blob/master/Grab%20Data%20Team this individual was a "directed mapper" for GRAB / Global Logic but left in July.  I suspect they won't see your message.
Best Regards,
Andy
GerdP (2018-10-17 17:57:58+00:00): Hi Andy,
well, so this will be one of many unanswered cs comments unless  sabiyana is still active for OSM...
eggie (2018-03-28 07:33:10+00:00): Goed initiatief, maar nu komen de adressen 2x voor in de database. Volgens mij kan een adres beter uniek zijn. Je zou het op het forum kunnen vragen. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:22:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:26:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:27:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
viloan (2018-03-28 01:59:50+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
will_p (2018-03-28 11:22:20+00:00): Hi, 
You have changed several streets from oneway=yes to oneway=no in the centre of Long Eaton. Unless things on the ground have changed very recently this appears incorrect. What is the source of your changes please?
ygudeti (2018-04-02 01:24:54+00:00): Hi,
I have changed the direction as the other side of the road was connected to a pedestrian street and thought the only possible way for the vehicles to go in and come is the same street.
Thanks.
will_p (2018-04-02 08:27:36+00:00): Thanks for responding. 

Please don't change access restrictions by guessing. The situation was worse after your change because people could be illegally routed the wrong way down one way streets, whereas before there were some short sections of street that were only routable via a pedestrian street (which is really the case). 

Access inconsistencies of this type can't be solved remotely. Perhaps open a Note and ask local mappers to take a look if it is a concern.

Regards,
Will
ygudeti (2018-04-03 08:15:56+00:00): Sure, thanks.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
user_5359 (2018-03-28 04:29:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the same named way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12772862?
Longshaor (2018-04-09 16:31:00+00:00): Yes, i did.  The one originally road doesn't line up with the existing road network as seen in the 'edit' mode.  I went back and forth with Google Earth (because their imagery resolution is much higher).  It LOOKS like the route originally shown is just a copy of the one shown on Google Earth, so I suspect they came from the same, incorrect, source material.  Also, the road doesn't loop around to reconnect with Roods Creek Road the way it's shown.  I've checked multiple sources and there's nothing but woods in that location.
user_5359 (2018-04-15 08:37:00+00:00): Should we delete the wrong highway then?
Longshaor (2018-05-19 02:03:04+00:00): Yes, the way it was originally shown isn't accurate
user_5359 (2018-06-03 15:20:51+00:00): done!
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:39:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Gppes (2018-03-28 06:27:56+00:00): Hi, could you please clarify your intentions according to this changeset? Greetings from Austria!
cleary (2018-03-28 06:54:39+00:00): The uploaded ways did not upload correctly and multiple orphan nodes are being removed. Will be uploaded again later in smaller groups of ways.
user_5359 (2018-03-28 04:45:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:27:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:22:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:27:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:26:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:24:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
paulbiv (2018-03-28 21:28:09+00:00): It's not a 'feature' and it's not a service road. Whatever gave you that idea? It's a High Street, Roman road etc. Them previous classification of highway=pedestrian is far closer. Are you a an armchair mapper? On the ground wins ALWAYS in OSM.
galithot (2018-03-30 09:29:38+00:00): Hi Paulbiv, I have done the edits based on the aerial imagery available. Apologies if that were not matching with the ground truth. Hence edited. Thanks for reverting my edits.
SomeoneElse (2018-03-30 09:45:43+00:00): Hi galithot,
Can you also explain why you made this change _here_? You are making changes in lots of geographically separated areas which suggests that you haven't actually visited the places in question. Are you part of some project, and if so, what is that?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
galithot (2018-04-11 02:18:33+00:00): I have made the edit using Remote Mapping technique and following the instructions on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags.
SomeoneElse (2018-04-11 06:32:41+00:00): @galithot Please answer the question.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:24:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964