piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5589 (2020-10-10 15:40:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bus%3Dyes

"Since 2011, some mappers have used bus=yes with highway=bus_stop, public_transport=platform, or both, to specify that a feature is a bus stop. This is the most common use of bus=yes."

"Note that bus=yes with highway=bus_stop and amenity=bus_station is redundant, as bus=yes is implied by these tags. However, this combination is common."

That looks like some documentation on the wiki to me. It may be a little tautological to use it in those circumstances, but there's no particular harm in it.

Now a tag combination that I have been using recently which is undocumented would be barrier=edging and edging=flush to represent the thin edging stones which often form the edge of a pavement's tarmac on the non-road side or between a pavement's tarmac and a grass verge.

That combination I just referred to I will definitely say is undocumented, but to claim that bus=yes in the circumstances that iD adds it as a tagging correction is "undocumented" is patently untrue.
Glassman (2020-10-11 00:47:37+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. 

When the editor ask the oneway question - you can just ignore it unless you know for sure that the road is oneway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92264269
plantgirl (2020-10-14 23:00:55+00:00): Thank you very much!
eggie (2020-10-10 07:26:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. 
In OSM Nederland worden bedrijven en instelling bijgetagd op de bestaande adresnode. Dus niet op de gebouwpomtrek.
Nieuwe gebouwen worden niet zelf ingetekend, maar periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG. Zelf kun je ook een verzoek doen op het forum voor import. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-10 07:35:34+00:00): Reverted by changeset #92265823
due mapping buildings on top of present buildings.
De Posthoorn was already present at the node.
If you have more questions you are welcome.
Greetz,
eggie
Miguel Pedr (2020-10-13 14:15:57+00:00): Hola,
En este caso, agregar un solo sentido para las carreteras debe ser correcto y apropiado, ya que asignar un retroceso en un solo sentido o incorrectamente puede tener un gran impacto en la ruta. En ocasiones puede llevar a la persona a no entrar en las carreteras donde hay un gran impacto en la ruta. El área está en construcción en algunas partes y no podemos definir la dirección hasta que el área esté completamente desarrollada. Tenga cuidado al agregar carreteras de un solo sentido porque agregar un solo sentido incorrecto puede afectar en gran medida la ruta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92264314
Artibonite (2020-10-14 23:29:06+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thank you for reaching out and I appreciate your concern with one ways. Bing imagery and DigitalGlobe Catalog imagery from 2018-07-28 show painted one way arrows on the roads where I applied one way restrictions. I noticed you made some additional edits here, but some may need further investigation, as www.openstreetmap.org/way/709321141 appears to be bi-directional and www.openstreetmap.org/way/709321132 appears to be disconnected with a barrier wall separating these roads. Please let me know what you think about these suggested edits, and I’m happy to make these changes if you agree. Thanks!
Miguel Pedr (2020-10-15 06:25:40+00:00): Hola Artibonite,
Las imágenes de Bing utilizadas están desactualizadas aquí y también cuando ve que la fecha de captura de destino es 2018 en comparación con las últimas imágenes de Maxar Standard o Maxar Premium, estas imágenes son las más recientes aquí y para www.openstreetmap.org/way/ 709321141 es un sentido y otro www.openstreetmap.org/way/709321132 aquí hay una cerca, si es necesario, puede agregar una puerta en lugar de desconectar la carretera. Si hay algo ahí puedes contactarme, estaré feliz de ayudarte
Artibonite (2020-10-16 21:04:00+00:00): Hi Miguel, Thanks for following up and I have added the missing barrier gate. Regarding www.openstreetmap.org/way/709321141, if you do think this should be a one way, Maxar Premium appears to show road wear from car travel that contradicts the current one way direction modeling. Do you think this one way should be reversed?
Miguel Pedr (2020-10-18 16:54:12+00:00): Hola Artibonite,
Que yo sepa, las direcciones unidireccionales proporcionadas para https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709321141 aquí son correctas. Si hay algo más, estaré encantado de ayudarte.
Glassman (2020-10-11 00:45:04+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92264514
plantgirl (2020-10-14 23:00:32+00:00): Thank you!
Warin61 (2020-11-12 03:04:35+00:00): This does not need to be a multiploygon! KISS

The simpler the objects in OSM the easier they are to understand for us humans and the easier they are to render for the computers.
radiotrefoil (2020-11-12 03:06:28+00:00): Will keep in mind, thanks
Glassman (2020-10-11 00:46:32+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92264659
plantgirl (2020-10-14 23:00:12+00:00): Thank you!
Glassman (2020-10-11 00:46:16+00:00): Tip: instead of deleting and redrawing, just modify the geometry to retain the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92264711
Glassman (2020-10-11 00:46:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92264711
plantgirl (2020-10-14 22:59:46+00:00): Thank you very much!
naveenpf (2020-10-11 04:58:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala


Please revert the deleted tags
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92264871
ramseraph1 (2021-05-26 13:51:59+00:00): This removes the Sadar taluk boundaries in the Varanasi district.. Can you please revert?
canfe (2020-10-14 10:28:27+00:00): Ho migliorato i tag.
Andrebbero completati come da
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_training
Non c'è una rete? Nemmeno una strada o snetiero che porta lì??
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 08:59:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
indigomc (2020-10-22 07:24:51+00:00): Hi 

With regard to your addition in this changeset, and please correct me if I have understood any of this. But there seem to be a number of private names added to the map in this and related changesets, apparently at their houses, despite the inappropriate tag / value leisure=common.  This must not happen - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information . Please reply promptly and if necessary remove this information. Otherwise I will do it very soon. If there is difficulty identifying all relevant such details, I may have to remove other information that has been added in this changeset. Please also notify any other contributors who have been involved in similar additions. 

Example 
node 7994377053, with these tags
access=private
leisure=common
name=Prasad Kalathinkal

Thanks, from user indigomc.
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:00:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 08:59:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:00:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:00:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:00:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
user_6110846 (2020-10-24 10:47:37+00:00): в городе Малин ты зря Лісовий кордон, 58 вулиця заменил на Лісовий кордон 58-а вулиця  

Вот в самом низу https://malynlis.com.ua/golovna.html потдверждение Лісовий кордон, 58
В лесничествах Украины используется специальнаяф  терминология -шифр 

Эта терминология -шифр используется для присваивания адресации в рабочих поселках лесничества 

Для тебя  и других эти названия есть бредом и хочется менять но это как раз делать не нужно  
И будет лучше если ты ВООБЩЕ НЕ БУДЕШ ТРОГАТЬ ТЕКСТ НА УКРАИНСКОМ
user_6110846 (2020-10-24 10:53:03+00:00): тоже самое Лісовий кордон, 47
user_6110846 (2020-10-24 10:58:54+00:00): Всебратське-2-а вулиця откат на Всебратське-2 В Украине в рабочих и военньіх поселках используются бредовьіе названия улиц и их трогать не нужно
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 08:59:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
Something B (2020-10-20 22:32:19+00:00): И где она сейчас?
dcapillae (2020-10-10 17:33:31+00:00): Hola, Jaime.

Gracias por añadir los senderos. La etiqueta «historic=ruins» la usamos solo cuando se trata de ruinas de cierta importancia histórica. Para otro tipo de infraestructuras en ruinas, puedes usar el prefijo de ciclo vital «ruins:» o, si se trata de un edificio, «building=ruins» es perfecto. Tienes más detalles en el wiki.

Sobre el prefijo de ciclo vital: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Prefijo_de_ciclo_vital

Sobre «historic=ruins»: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:historic%3Druins

Recuerda también conectar siempre los extremos del sendero a la vía inmediatametne adyacente a él (si existe). Así conseguimos que los recorridos sean plenamente enrutables y no queden caminos sueltos.

Buen trabajo. Gracias de nuevo por mejorar el mapa.

Cordialmente,

Daniel
user_7130456 (2020-10-20 15:59:35+00:00): 你在学校里面标这些没有标签的点干嘛
aceman444 (2020-10-29 20:20:36+00:00): Zdravim, dajte si pozor na to zarovnanie snimkov ESRI, posunte si ich tak aby sedeli na existujuce objekty a budovy (na ich zakladnu, nie strechu) a az potom kreslite nove objekty. Lebo zial tu v Jasenskej doline ste vsetko zakreslili posunute a este aj to co bolo dobre ste presunuli zle. Dajte na to pozor. A preco odosielate kazdy domcek v samostatnej sade zmien?
aceman444 (2020-10-29 20:24:43+00:00): A uz vobec neposuvajte domy so znackou source=kapor2. Tie su importovane z katastra SR a su casto dobre, s rozmazanycmi snimkami ESRI ich urcite neviete upresnit.
242935640 (2020-10-10 10:45:09+00:00): Hi AWFCloin,

what does "2572" mean? It's very cryptic to me.

Best wishes
stukulele (2020-10-26 10:09:35+00:00): Thanks for adding this old railway footpath,  I was looking to do this myself!
maraf24 (2020-10-10 11:01:46+00:00): Poprawka błędna, tu nie ma brodu.
jfd553 (2020-12-13 14:04:41+00:00): I do not understand why you changed the wooded area (surronding the commercial area) from a multipolygon to a standard way, duplicating all the nodes. The multipolygon was checked with JOSM tools before upload.
Cebderby (2020-10-10 11:53:38+00:00): Please read 
https://www.abct.org.uk/footer/terms/
before making any more edits
naveenpf (2020-10-11 04:59:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92271296
PT-53 (2020-11-01 06:43:06+00:00): Hallo Fischerhausle,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz uan diesen Flächen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/753673578/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824331661/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172851462/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283420865/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283420864/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283420864/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188386506/history
jeweils das Merkmal
landuse=*
gelöscht.
War das ein Versehen oder warum hast Du das Merkmal gelöscht?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
Gefunden mit OSM-Inspector:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=8.05183&lat=48.01537&zoom=15&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags
Fischerhaeusle (2020-11-01 17:13:29+00:00): Hallo PT-53 , 
Vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis
 Da ist mir wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen. Das war definitiv keine Absicht.
 Habe es wieder rückgänig gemacht.

 Grüße
yrtimiD (2020-10-10 13:43:25+00:00): we can map it with bicycle:conditional=yes @ (> Dec-Jan off )
or something similar. it will help if IHM supports it
zstadler (2020-10-11 09:27:27+00:00): IMO, it is unlikely that this section is permanently closed for 2 months. More likely the park attendants close it for a few days at a time, according to the water level.
If this is the case, it should not be mapped:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
eggie (2020-10-10 11:36:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Staat hier einde autoweg? 
Het zou zomaar kunnen natuurlijk. 

MVG,
Eggie
JeroenvanderGun (2020-10-10 12:11:54+00:00): Ja:
* Op de hoofdrijbaan staat sinds kort bord G4 op het 70-bord (vroeger ontbrak G4 domweg).
* De oprit van Schoemakerstraat richting A13 heeft geen bord G3 (wel C16+C9)
eggie (2020-10-10 12:46:38+00:00): Oke... bedankt voor je reactie.

Mvg
Eggie
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-11 10:54:53+00:00): Hoi multimodaal. Ik ben aan het overwegen om landuse=retail bij de Panoramahoeve en het Koetshuis toe te voegen zodat ze beter zichtbaar zijn. Denk je dat die hier van toepassing zijn?
multimodaal (2020-10-11 11:04:02+00:00): Hoi Friendly Ghost,
Na het lezen van https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dretail lijkt me dat eigenlijk ook wel mooi: "landuse=retail [...] The tag also includes restaurants, "

Het zijn ook geen restaurants van besloten clubs ofzo (dat zou de tag retail misschien problematisch maken),
Van de Panoramahoeve heb ik zelf gezien dat deze gewoon openstaat voor publiek adhv menukaart bij ingang terrein etc, Koetshuis heb ik alleen van achterzijde uit het bos gezien, maar uit hun website blijkt ook dat het een gewoon restaurant is. 
https://www.hetkoetshuis.nl/reserveren/

Goed idee volgens mij dus (-:
Cheers en dank voor je bijdrage!
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-11 12:56:11+00:00): Ja, dat is dan helemaal prima. Ik zal er een mooi vlak van maken. Nog een fijne zondagmiddag!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 11:26:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 14928686, 2444466, 28954949, 29025668, 48199821, 5141474, 7234383, 7235063.
VictorIE (2023-03-24 14:46:19+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268783997/

Possible typo - should this read "Retired Fire Station"? Do you know where the new station is?
BCNorwich (2021-04-03 07:48:09+00:00): Hi, for Way: 857506902 probably a better tag to suit the purpose is surface=grass which is rendered, landcover=grass is not rendered.

Regards Bernard.
Paul The Archivist (2021-04-04 09:20:04+00:00): Hi Bernard, 
Thanks for the suggestion though I'm not sure about that, I reckon the surface tag is more something you add as a secondary tag to describe something like a road rather than as the main tag for an object. 

I don't think it matters too much if it renders, it's only a bit of grass outside some flats, most other little bits of grass like this within a property aren't mapped and it would be perhaps better if it wasn't rendered. 

The landcover tag I think is perhaps the best one to use for micromapping insignificant areas of grass within a property rather than two overlapping landuses.

Cheers, 
Paul
Kovoschiz (2020-10-10 15:28:19+00:00): 1. Don't delete points such as especially https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7428749415/history. Move them to the correct position instead. 
2. Don't connect areas to roads. This doesn't reflect reality (they don't extend over roads), and is difficult to edit 
3. The meaning of `=irregular_settlement` is very remotely relevant here. 
4. `highway=living_street` refers to a pedestrian-priority road. These would be `highway=residential` (if "public" and "outside") and `highway=service` (if inside a facility or site)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92274208
Kovoschiz (2020-10-10 15:35:08+00:00): `landuse=residential` should be used, not `building=house` directly
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92274208
Kovoschiz (2020-10-10 16:07:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92280147
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92274208
Edwin Ko (2020-10-11 11:09:11+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz,

I am relatively new to map editing and thank you very much for your precise comments. I will take note of them and make sure avoid making the same mistake. However, I would like to ask if I want to indicate a two-way minor road restricted to residents and their related persons by permission only, which kind of road should I use?

Cheers,
Edwin
Kovoschiz (2020-10-12 10:59:18+00:00): Usually `highway=service` ("service road"), with `service=driveway` ("driveway") sometimes only. The common meaning of driveways isn't widely found in HK. Most roads don't go to individual houses, only each premise, especially to a parking area. 
There's the concept of shared "drvieways" raised in the West. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway#Pipestems It's not readily applicable in HK yet, again especially with individual houses needing a separate road to fit the definition. 
You can ignore all these more in depth discussed , to simply use the most general `highway=service` ("service road") without any further specification.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92274208
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-07 02:58:56+00:00): These are some good imports!  Even doing building parts!  Man, if only you could get the same data and do this type of import around Atlanta to replace a bunch of other sub-par imports!  :D
Mashin (2023-03-08 00:12:32+00:00): Thanks! 
I would really like to get involved with more imports, there are many datasets worth adding to OSM. The sad part is that preparation and execution take so much time that right now it is unfeasible for me. 🙁
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-08 00:16:29+00:00): I know, but at least you do it right and add useful things to the map, and do so correctly, unlike some people. *cough cough* ...Who are still being cleaned up after.
Mashin (2023-03-08 00:28:33+00:00): Yup.. I am still slowly making my way through an ancient waterway import from NHD that was done 13 years ago.
Well important is that OSM keeps improving with every edit...
Leo Slager (2020-10-12 11:05:30+00:00): Dag HiddeWie,
Goed dat je de access restrictions voor delivery aanbrengt.
Maar waarom voeg je mofa/moped/motorcycle toe aan een highway=pedestrian ?
Die is default alleen toegankelijk voor voetgangers en behoeft dus geen extra tags.
Nou kan het ook geen kwaad, dus ik ga het niet verwijderen, maar die tags zijn dus volkomen overbodig.
HiddeWie (2020-10-12 16:46:02+00:00): Beste Leo,

Dank voor de reactie. Strak gezien is de moped/motorcycle/mofa toewijzing niet nodig. Maar er staat in de binnenstad expliciet aangegeven dat brommers/motoren niet zijn toegestaan, onafhankelijk van bezorgtijden. Zie bijvoorbeeld de volgende foto https://images2.persgroep.net/rcs/aBKFUazZfv_1vQP9h36q_W4k4R0/diocontent/175562431/_fitwidth/694/?appId=21791a8992982cd8da851550a453bd7f&quality=0.8&desiredformat=webp. Het leek me een goed idee om dat expliciet op alle highways aan te geven. In het bijzonder omdat veel voetgangersgebieden in de meeste steden in Nederland wel degelijk toegankelijk zijn voor motoren/brommers (mits langzaam wordt gereden).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 13:47:44+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 91326385.
eggie (2020-10-10 14:47:15+00:00): Geert probeer de BAG info ook intact te laten.
source:date	=2014-03-24
gr Eggie
eggie (2020-10-10 15:01:23+00:00): source:date BAG hersteld
eggie (2020-10-10 14:58:12+00:00): Jeroen.. 
Tip: 
Wellicht ook wel interessant om deze draadje te volgen
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=804390#p804390

en

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=803967#p803967

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-10 14:45:49+00:00): Geert.. haal je de adresnode ook nog weg?
gr eggie
eggie (2020-10-10 15:12:12+00:00): Import nieuwbouw aangevraagd
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=804446#p804446
Het adres kan nog wel even blijven staan.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-10-10 18:52:02+00:00): Geïmporteerd inmiddels ..
Wanneer het gereed is kan de regel construction yes verwijderd worden en building=construction aangepast worden naar =yes
Geertjuh (2020-10-12 16:57:28+00:00): 👍
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:30:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 90548736, 90548887, 90548978, 90549288, 90549307, 91160167, 91160209, 91160571, 91162895, 91163047, 91163101, 91163119, 91163366, 91163493, 91163505, 91163525, 91199975, 91200433, 91202457, 91202617, 91203603, 91204454, 91204762, 91204939, 91205118, 91205418, 91205549, 91205703, 91205745, 91205791, 91206233, 91206294, 91206397, 91206540, 91206617, 91206677, 91206744, 91206822, 91206909, 91206950, 91206994, 91207044, 91207096, 91207168, 91207652, 91207710, 91207745, 91207809, 91207865, 91207898, 91207936, 91207987, 91208023, 91208067, 91208181, 91208217, 91208260, 91208289, 91208337, 91208393, 91208431, 91208475, 91209017, 91209080, 91209134, 91209183, 91209234, 91209270, 91209334, 91209379, 91209597, 91209653, 91209703, 91209731, 91209776, 91209843, 91209902, 91210197, 91210313, 91210369, 91210395, 91210429, 91210470, 91210509, 91210542, 91210599, 91210634, 91210676, 91210716, 91210750, 91210791, 91210830, 91210874, 91210914, 91210942, 91210994, 91211036, 91211065, 91211114, 91212497, 91212642, 91212753, 91212861, 91213058, 91213263, 91213384, 91213503, 91213589, 91214647, 91214790, 91215021, 91215298, 91215354, 91257560, 91257631, 91257721, 91258027, 91258237, 91258434, 91259068, 91260055, 91260207, 91260280, 91260417, 91260696, 91262361, 91564668, 91564700, 91564746, 91564780, 91564812, 91564826, 91564852, 91564875, 91564937, 91564955, 91565010, 91565041, 91565071, 91565096, 91669143, 91669423.