piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2021-10-26 14:49:59+00:00): if you are in a group, you start a discussion within the group, trying to get other people involved. 
without a group, you just start using the new tag as if you had reached an agreement with your own head.
you would also ask for review to your edits, and you might engage in discussion on a forum, help site, or mailing list.
if we were in a discussion/chat, I might put on the table "unesco:endangered:<date-of-start>-<date-of-end>"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#Date_namespace_suffix_as_.22keyname:DATESPEC.3D...22
maraf24 (2021-09-20 12:12:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979867789
Tego budynku nie brakuje, bo został wyburzony.
charl3s (2021-09-20 14:59:31+00:00): Mylisz się. Ten budynek jest stosunkowo nowy
charl3s (2021-09-20 15:05:12+00:00): W sumie dziwne
Na orto 2020 faktycznie wygląda na wyburzony, a ja pamiętam jak ten budynek był nowy. Czyżby cos poszło nie tak i go wyburzyli? Naprawdę dziwne.
charl3s (2021-09-20 15:07:49+00:00): Nawet na googlowskie zdjęcia w 2017 się załapał i widać, że nówka https://www.google.pl/maps/@51.9264454,22.3774561,3a,51.9y,335.38h,87.5t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sPP1fkwQEwGdIKgZyjnaIKw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
maraf24 (2021-09-20 17:08:13+00:00): Rozebrali, bo to była samowola budowlana.
ZLima12 (2022-03-17 20:43:06+00:00): Hi,

Please refer to the wiki when using new tags. For this one (barrier=cable_barrier), here's the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=cable_barrier

This page says to draw a way _along the barrier location_. You put the tag on NY-17 instead, which is not correct.

I'm going to remove the tag from the road, and if there is indeed a barrier here, please draw a NEW line where it is, and put this tag on it.

Thanks,
John
osmviborg (2021-09-06 06:59:18+00:00): 'todo' tagget er deprecated
ZeLonewolf (2021-09-06 18:24:22+00:00): Hello,

This appears to be an attempt to circumvent the blocks listed below with new user accounts and new referral domains.  This type of behavior will not be tolerated by the US mapping community, and we will swiftly revert and report future attempts to bypass community standards of behavior.  Please stop spamming referral links.  It is a waste of everyone's time including yours.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5316
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5317
ZeLonewolf (2021-09-06 18:48:50+00:00): Whoops, put that on my own changeset :-D
alectrocute (2021-09-07 13:59:14+00:00): I love the no-nonsense warning from yourself, to yourself.. hah!
MapSpot (2021-09-28 03:29:49+00:00): The only one strong enough to stop ZeLonewolf is ZeLonewolf.
pitscheplatsch (2021-09-09 19:58:20+00:00): Hallo HKHLBG,

wenn ich fragen darf, weswegen wurde hier an einige Ways ein cycleway:both=no angehängt? 

Danke & Gruß
Pascal
cuzi (2025-07-10 08:58:32+00:00): Weißt du ob der Hinweis von anonym korrekt ist, da du die Wege hinzugefügt hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4611742
ovruni (2021-09-06 05:50:54+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjuntos de cambios se ha utilizado la etiqueta de nombre para colocar direcciones, la etiqueta de nombre esta destinada solamente para los objetos que tienen un nombre en particular.  [0] En este caso puede utilizar addr:full.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre
Lee Carré (2021-09-05 22:08:30+00:00): Some feedback, since you're relatively new.

source= ? Particularly for purposes of verification.

For entrances, they're assumed to be 2-way by default, so no need to add (entrance|exit)=yes . The exception is when some are (entrance|exit)-only (some larger establishments have oneway door systems).

For exit-only (e.g. node #9064598814 which has entrance=no & exit=yes) then simply entrance=exit . The typical use of exit=* is exit=emergency . See the wiki.

The entrance=* tag should denote the purpose / significance of the doorway. E.g. entrance=main (vs. entrance=service).

For access=permit , according to the wiki this is for when a permit is fairly easy to obtain. When permits are difficult to obtain, then the recommendation is to set access=private . Though, that may match what you intended; just pointing it out.

air_conditioning is a key I'll keep in mind for future 🙂.

As for the way (#179245903):
▪︎opening_hours:covid19=same — same as what? There's no opening_hours=*
▪︎operator=Government of Jersey's Modernisation and Digital Department — to avoid having a thousand values for the same entity (think of data-parsers), simply Government of Jersey . It would be good to also set operator:type=government in such cases. Context of which section of the States can be derived from context (such as where website=* points to, plus the value you set for description=*). Else, make description more specific: description:operator=Government of Jersey's [… whatever …].
▪︎website=https://www.gov.je — firstly the string should have a trailing slash (to be a properly formed URL). Since this seems like a major office for this section of the States then a more specific URL pointing to the website section for said department. Preferably a short one which will continue working in the future.
▪︎addr:city=St Helier — should match (in this case) the short_name of the containing administrative boundary, which would be addr:city=St. Helier . It's an abbreviation, after all. Else use the expanded version: Saint Helier . Arguably the name=* of the admin boundary should match the short_name since that's commonly used, despite being an abbreviation (which are discouraged).

I think that was all. Thanks for your contribution.
Geofreund1 (2021-10-14 08:52:27+00:00): Attention : google street view peut ne pas être une source autorisée !
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-09-05 21:36:18+00:00): الاسم الرسمي والمعتمد هو آل نشوان أرجوا منكم عدم تغييره وعدم وضعه مع لغات أخرى، كما أرجوا منكم عدم إضافة مدات للاسم بين الأحرف لأنها تتسبب في خلل في التطبيقات المرتبطة بالخريطة وتعطل البحث لمن يرغب بالبحث عن المكان
abrensch (2021-10-01 08:32:49+00:00): Hallo ZB_BN,

diese rücke hier soll dann wohl auch nicht oneway sein? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130638827
Glassman (2021-09-05 22:44:18+00:00): Looks like an awesome trail. Should the original section also be named Acid War Zone Trail if so can you make the change?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110764581
SekeRob (2021-09-06 06:37:58+00:00): Great going Marcel, 4 nodes, 1 just 2000 miles separated from the others and everyone in-between being notified in their local history view. Pretty please, keep your edits localized, then save and move onto the next. Nobody needs to know but those mappers near these places.

TIA
Marcel-NL (2021-09-06 09:27:48+00:00): Hey Rob. Sorry about this. It's the first time I have used the Osmand app to edit the map and I didn't know it would combine the separate changes into one changeset.
SekeRob (2021-09-06 10:32:33+00:00): Yup, many of these 'smart' editors do this to include the Osmose level 0 editor, Streetconplete and more. Was on a town cycle run few days ago, all items of same type got smapped together and when home the history showed the edit set was held open and allowed to comments on when closed... that's not for an hour i read with same tool/device. Add something within that time and the hour resets, i believe. An edit set has a stretch up to 24 hours as long as something keeps getting added within the hour. 

Thanks for responding.
eggie (2021-09-09 09:33:07+00:00): Dag Rob..
Je zou het hek barrier=gate ook kunnen intekenen en daar ook de accesstags op kunnen zetten.
Het openbaar gedeelte tuissen fietspad en Slingerweg heb ik afgesplitst en ontdaan van access=no 
Die brug in het fietspad (andere mapper) heb ik ook maar verwijderd. 
MVG
eggie
user_2066394 (2021-09-05 22:18:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dveterinary
Gazer75 (2021-10-30 05:44:57+00:00): Why did you add fictional lines inside the power station at Three Gorges Dam?
Gazer75 (2021-09-12 18:28:10+00:00): Why did you add fictitious power lines at the dam? Please don't do that.
mariotomo (2021-09-06 14:50:04+00:00): hola y bienvenido a OSM. mencionas nombres que no se encuentran en la base de datos. tienes conocimiento local que puedas compartir? cuál es la "casa 20"? y "Los Cipreses II"? también hay un "Los Cipreses I"? son urbanizaciones, cierto? mientras "Villa Zaita" es el barrio que los incluye, me confirmas?
los números de casas se añaden como "addr:housenumber", y las urbanizaciones hay varias maneras de hacerlo y podemos mirar cuál sirve mejor en el área.
DressyPear4 (2021-09-05 23:23:47+00:00): Parece estar tudo ok. Continue com o bom trabalho.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110766093
Lee Carré (2021-09-05 22:25:51+00:00): Holy crap; you've had a busy & productive evening 😀. 👍

Pity that I'm now a bit too far to easily survey these.
DressyPear4 (2021-09-05 23:19:28+00:00): Olá, como a população é baixa, acho que esses locais ficam melhor definidos como hamlet
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:place
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110766500
woodpeck (2023-07-03 10:24:04+00:00): Hallo, der FOSSGIS hat von einem Wanderer einen Screenshot geschickt bekommen, auf dem die OSM-Ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979888722 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979892634 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980054482 markiert sind. Dazu schreibt er: "Hallo OSM-Team, wir haben mit Komoot im Gebiet Hintersee eine Runde aufs Königsberger Horn navigiert. Der mit Leuchtstift eingezeichnete Weg existiert nicht, wir mussten daher einen grösseren Bogen machen." -- Du hast diese Wege vor zwei Jahren eingetragen. Ist es möglich, dass sie inzwischen geschlossen oder zugewachsen sind?
DoKimbDeSun (2023-07-04 19:41:37+00:00): Servus. Ich kanns derweil nur durchs aktuelle Basemap-Bild beurteilen, der erste Weg könnte durchaus zugewchsen sein, bei den beiden im Bereich der Karschhütte handelt es sich um eine Schotterstraße bzw einen Weg durch freies Gelände - käme mir komisch vor, dass die nicht passierbar wären, außer sie sin für Wanderer gesperrt. Der dritte Weg ist außerdem auf der ÖK verzeichnet. Mehr kann ich derweil auch nicht sagen...
ChehrehBargi (2022-10-24 16:14:54+00:00): تقسیم بندی شهر به مناطق 4 گانه اردبیل، بسیار خوب است و از شما سپاس گذاریم. البته در جایی که خط دیگری هست نیازی نیست خط جدید رسم کنید. می‌توانید با استفاده از مولتی پولیگن برای یک خط (مرز حکومتی) چند نقش تعیین کنید.
Mahdi Nameghi (2021-09-06 03:27:20+00:00): سلام
هدف از ایجاد ریلیشن شماره 13039595 چیه؟
آیا اصلا چنین مسیری امکان پذیر هست که براش محدودیت ایجاد کردین؟
wonderb0lt (2021-09-06 10:52:54+00:00): Hey,

maybe that name would fit better on a separate node inside the building, or the building itself (if it covers the whole building), instead of the address node?
user_15661662 (2022-07-28 03:57:11+00:00): Why change the highway type?
Jeffrey Friedl (2022-07-28 11:47:59+00:00): Hi Yueying.  
Which street are you referring to?  I edited this a year ago, so I don't recall the exact changes I made.
jeslop (2021-09-06 07:29:18+00:00): Hola Morimaru. Gracias por incorporarte a OSM y por tus primeras colaboraciones. ¿Podría sindicar cuál es la fuente para los nombres que le estás poniendo a estas pistas?  Si sólo son conocidas con estos nombres por los aficionados a MTB la etiqueta mtb:name sería suficiente y no como nombre general. Un saludo.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Warin61 (2021-09-06 07:10:48+00:00): Similar problem here with relation 13168250. 

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=132.28272&lat=-14.46585&zoom=17
Hernan (2021-09-06 17:05:28+00:00): Cambio revertido porque no corresponde separar la calzada
ovruni (2021-09-06 04:59:50+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado descripciones de dirección dentro de la etiqueta de nombre, la cual debe ingresarse solamente si un objeto posee un nombre en particular [0]. Asimismo existen diferentes etiquetas para cada diferentes características de dirección [1]. También en la wiki de OSM [2] puede encontrar diferentes etiquetas para diferentes característica en el mapa.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe

Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org
nevw (2021-09-06 11:53:40+00:00): There is an improbability with all your edits and they have been reverted.
DUGA (2021-09-13 15:43:07+00:00): Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/158395844#map=19/39.69508/-79.15114
ElliottPlack (2021-09-13 23:32:32+00:00): Looks like I missed the existing node because it was outside of a buffer. I’ll move the one you cited to the center and fix
ElliottPlack (2021-09-14 21:26:40+00:00): fixed
ivanbranco (2021-09-15 19:30:17+00:00): Hi Basil,

what's the meaning of the syllubus=STATE tag?
NicoSa (2023-08-29 09:01:44+00:00): Hi Stefan, dort ist, zumindest aus Richtung Süden, das Befahren mit dem Rad erlaubt (Fußgänger haben natürlich Vorrang).
Lade das Bild von gestern gerade hoch.

Gruß
Nico
StefanHRT (2023-08-29 10:19:28+00:00): Hi Nico, schau mal bitte wie alt der Änderungssatz ist ;) Du kennst ja selber wie sich in der Zeit was verändern kann. Ohne jetzt zu wissen welchen Weg Du genau meinst, tippe ich mal auf die Spandauer Havelpromenade, da gibt es eine Note auf Höhe Pohleseestraße wegen der fraglichen Beschilderung
ovruni (2021-09-06 05:46:56+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha utilizado la etiqueta de nombre para colocar una dirección, la etiqueta de nombre esta destinadao solamente para los objetos que tienen un nombre en particular.  [0] En este caso puede utilizar addr:full. Por otra parte, el uso de abreviaturas (como mz, lt) se encuentran desaconsejados. [1]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_.28no_hacer_esto.29
Markus366 (2021-09-06 09:12:16+00:00): Hallo!

Warum ist die Zufahrtsstraße zur Bundesstraße auch als B247 getaggt ?

Gruß Markus
user_13528767 (2021-09-07 05:06:02+00:00): Hallo Markus,

die Zeißstraße wurde der B247 zugeordnet. 
Im Zuge der Errichtung der OU wurden einige Straßen in Leinefelde umgestuft.

Zu erkennen in der Netzknotenkarte des TLBV Region Nord.

vNK 4628069G
nNK 4628018B

Gruß 

Euer Ampelmännchen
archpdx (2021-09-06 05:40:08+00:00): Whoops, accidentally checked request review
osmviborg (2021-09-06 06:16:44+00:00): Prøv 'SDFE Terrain Shadow Map' når en vandløb er væk i træer. Jeg har rettet til.
Amir Rozlan (2021-09-06 05:55:56+00:00): #creador02
kartonage (2021-09-06 08:52:34+00:00): Hej,

please don't delete valid elements. Feel free to contribute in a meaningful way.
I have restored the elements deleted by you in changeset 110787715.

Best regards

Привет,

пожалуйста, не удаляйте действительные элементы. Не стесняйтесь вносить значимый вклад.
Я восстановил элементы, удаленные вами в ревизии 110787715.

С наилучшими пожеланиями
rah_em (2021-09-07 09:56:40+00:00): Hi Hien Pham1990, 
Trust you are doing well,
I have removed overlapping primary highways. Kindly refer these ways w979955518, w979955519, w979955520, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110847766
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110777355
vasony (2021-09-07 19:31:58+00:00): Az utcanevet sikerült tisztázni? 
Mert még vettél fel fixme-t az utcára hogy meg kell nézni. Így most eltér a cím és az utcanév
sd_ciastko (2021-09-12 19:32:04+00:00): Tök jogos. El is felejtettem, hogy ez függőben maradt korábban. Köszi, hogy szóltál. Megnéztem még egyszer és csak Boróka köz elnevezés van kitáblázva (az is csak az egyik oldalon). Javítottam.
eggie (2021-09-06 20:30:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-06 20:38:14+00:00): Feedback.. Eigenlijk kun je niet van een luchtfoto op aan.  Die zijn schuin genomen. Kijk nooit naar de daken.
Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit de Kadasterdata en de gebouwen zijn precies ingemeten.
Kennelijk is hier nog niet ingemeten.
Ik zal het gebouw uitlijnen mbv de BGT omtrekgericht. 
Je zou een terugmelding kunnen doen naar de BAG met het vezoek om eindelijk eens in te meten of hun administrateie op orde te brengen
Doe je dat zelf?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=heffezand%205&resultOffset=0&objectId=1651100000017489&geometry.x=232656.17200257&geometry.y=600808.51899978&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=1651010000024030

MVG
eggie

MVG
eggoe
eggie (2021-09-06 20:43:38+00:00): Dag Peter . Ik heb wat uitgelijnd mbv de BGT omtrekgericht. Ook de naastliggende panden. Het Kadaster geeft aan Niet ingemeten.
Dat zal haast niet.. Je kunt een terugmelding doen naar de BAG.

MVG
eggie
SimonPoole (2021-09-22 20:31:21+00:00): Abend :-)

Ich versteh die Änderung von https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6857115 in landuse=residential nicht ganz, Teile davon sind sogar ganz sicher rechtlich nicht Wohngebiet und werden es wohl auch nie sein.

Gruss

Simon
captain_slow (2021-09-22 21:20:39+00:00): Oh, da muss ich zugeben, dass mir das nicht aufgefallen ist. Da hat mich wohl das zerstückelte Multipolygon etwas reingelegt. Ich muss mir noch mal anschauen, welchen Teil davon ich tatsächlich in ein Wohngebiet ändern wollte.
Danke für das Bemerken des Fehlers und mich darauf aufmerksam machen.
captain_slow (2021-09-22 21:34:33+00:00): Ich habe das Multipolygon jetzt wieder zurückgeändert [1] und den einen kleinen Teil, den ich als Wohngebiet wollte, zu einem eigenen Multipolygon gemacht [2].
[1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111563216
[2]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13252782
SimonPoole (2021-09-22 21:36:21+00:00): IMHO macht das MP gesamthaft so oder so nicht sehr viel Sinn, kann man auch aufteilen.
ThomasA (2021-09-20 19:48:01+00:00): Hej @osmviborg, hvor har du omridset af vandområdet mellem Fibigerstræde og Fredrik Bajers Vej fra? Jeg mener ikke, det svarer helt til det faktiske omrids af bassinet. Jeg har selv været ude at gå omridset omkring med GPS, men det lader til, at du har rettet det bagefter.
ThomasA (2021-09-20 19:51:18+00:00): https://bygst.dk/nyheder/2020/juli/aalborg-universitet-klimasikres-mod-kraftige-skybrud/
osmviborg (2021-09-20 20:18:22+00:00): Ud fra dette: https://listservices.kortforsyningen.dk/#/map/WMS/orto_foraar_temp
osmviborg (2021-09-06 07:14:29+00:00): Sådan var den jo også tagget:
'access=private'
Er der ikke mere adgang til handicap parkeringen syd for Dodekalitten?
John Heyn (2021-09-06 07:48:42+00:00): Jo der er stadig handicap parkering, syd for, men vi har desværre stadig rigtig meget trafik der kører til dodekalitten via Glentehøjvej, og hvis der søgesd rute vejledning via Google Map, så vises der til Dodekalitten via Glentehøjvej, og de skal køre til Kragenæs, hvordan kan denne rutevejledning ændres
b-holdet (2021-09-06 09:01:04+00:00): Du kan angive et dataproblem på Glentehøjvej i Google Maps. Jeg har skrevet at der er et problem, da vejen er privat og kun til handicapkørsel.
Du kan gøre det samme, så Google vil "opdage" problemet. Google benytter algoritmer til at spore problemer på kortet og har så vidt jeg ved ikke rigtige personer til at rette det.
John Heyn (2021-09-06 09:03:54+00:00): Tak..
det prøver jeg også.
osmviborg (2021-09-06 19:09:22+00:00): Google Maps problem er sandsynligvis at der på deres kort ikke findes andre veje  til attraktionen. Stien fra nord findes ikke på Google Maps, hvilket er underligt. Et kig på Strava viser masser af 'trafik' fra denne retning.
Minh Nguyen (2021-09-15 10:07:22+00:00): Hi, thanks for taking the time to detail these driveways and shared driveways, especially those gates. In case you aren’t aware, the access=private tag is specifically about restrictions on who may enter or pass through a property. There’s a different tag, ownership=private, for indicating that a property is privately owned: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ownership . There isn’t a built-in field for ownership=private, but you can add it in the Tags section.
pedronav (2021-09-18 08:30:39+00:00): Hi Minh. I'm using access=private so those roads can't be used by routing, especially when there is a gate. Should I be using access=destination instead?

Routing was my intent and not to declare ownership, should I have used that instead? Thanks!
Minh Nguyen (2021-09-18 16:19:01+00:00): You’re absolutely correct in using access=private on driveways that have gates or no trespassing signs. I was just unsure about your intent because some of the driveways didn’t appear to have gates mapped; I didn’t know if you had intended to tag all driveways as access=private on the basis of their ownership.

Routers already more or less assume access=destination on driveways by default, by penalizing them heavily and not allowing them to be used as cut-throughs, so it’s OK to leave the access key blank in cases where there’s nothing explicitly preventing access.
pedronav (2021-09-18 17:08:50+00:00): Google Maps is now showing those roads grayed out because they are private.

That's another reason why I was setting the access to private, so mapbox would show then also in a lighter color to indicate they are not public roads (would it be better to change their type to driveways instead of service roads).

I'm running all around San Jose and Santa Clara, as part of a run all the streets goal, and I update the map with my observations as I go through an area, but it's difficult to maintain consistency on access, road type etc.
Minh Nguyen (2021-09-18 17:26:43+00:00): Some of these may be good candidates for tagging as Driveway (service=driveway) or Alley (service=alley), though a plain Service Road (highway=service) would be appropriate for shared driveways, at least until a more specific tag for them arises.

The access=* key is intended for a legal access restriction, such as one that would be established by posting a No Trespassing sign. The shared driveways aren’t public roads in the sense that they aren’t publicly owned, but if for example a delivery vehicle can go there, then it isn’t really the same as having a No Trespassing sign.

The Mapbox Streets source assigns its “street_limited” class to roads with access=private among other things. But it also has a “service” class, corresponding to the highway=service tag, that’s intended for public and private driveways in general: https://docs.mapbox.com/vector-tiles/reference/mapbox-streets-v8/#--road---class-text If the particular map you’re using makes the “service” class look too much like a through street, that could be a bug on the application’s part rather than a data issue.

In any case, kudos for the attention you’re paying to the quality of the road network as you work towards your goal. In case you’re interested, the local volunteer mapping community meets online every other week to chat and learn about OSM: https://www.meetup.com/Code-for-San-Jose/ You can also connect with other mappers who run all the streets on OSMUS Slack: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
ququruzka (2021-09-06 09:21:32+00:00): вітаю, мапере !
нагадуємо, що на територрії України діють назви вулиць, провулків, проспектів, бульварів та ін. виключно українською мовою.

будь ласка, верніть всі зміни назад (залишити українські назви вулиць).
дякуємо.