piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
beautifulplaces_2History (2021-10-27 11:21:52+00:00): Sehr geehrter Herr #?, das Österreichische Bundesamt für Eich und Vermessungswesen stellt unter geeigneter Lizenz OpenStreetMap hochwertige Luftbilder zur Verfügung. Warum das Tiroler Tiris Team meint, solche redundant ebenfalls anzubieten entzieht sich unserem Verständnis.

Zu angeblich ausgesparte Wege ist anzumerken dass sich diese gut als Trennelement für Flächenpolygone eignen. Das verkleben von Flächen mit Wegen ist verpönt. Von Ihnen als Schneisen bezeichneten Aussparungen entstehen so technisch bedingt.
woodpeck (2021-10-27 15:22:34+00:00): Offensichtlich eine regelwidrig angelegte Sockenpuppe des (wegen Unbelehrbarkeit, Mikromapping und unbelegter Unterstellungen) dauerhaft gesperrten Benutzers "beautifulplaces". Benutzer gesperrt und alle Änderungen entfernt.
Hungerburg (2021-10-27 19:26:24+00:00): Die Antwort oben hätte unserem geschiedenen Bundeskanzler zu Ehre gereicht.
felipeeugenio (2021-10-26 18:59:42+00:00): Hola. Por favor no usar abreviaciones (psje. Avda, etc...) No tienen mucho sentido en un formato digital.
gracias
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Pt873 (2021-10-25 22:04:22+00:00): Olá. Não é permitido cruzar da Avenida Reis Perdigão para a Rua Cinco de Janeiro. O único sentido permitido é da Avenida São Marçal para a Rua Cinco de Janeiro, como estava anteriormente.
GoatoftheNorth (2021-10-26 15:27:44+00:00): Olá Pt873,

Obrigado pela informação e pela remodelação do entroncamento.

Saúde

 Hi Pt873,

Thank you for the information and for remodeling the junction.

Cheers
Sandal man (2021-10-30 12:21:50+00:00): Decathlon abre el 2-11-2021 Escuché.
paunofu (2021-10-30 23:00:45+00:00): En su página web pone 12 de noviembre de 2021, pero hoy ya he visto actividad por fuera.
eggie (2021-10-25 20:52:03+00:00): Dag Luca,
Lijkt mij de juiste plaats. 
Tip...  Stel als achtergrond luchtfoto PDOK actueel in. BING ligt op veel plaatsen verschoven en is 'outdated'
Het zijn allemaal luchtfoto's genomen uit een vliegtuig. .. geen satellietfoto's. 
Satellietfoto's zijn er overigens ook.
Zie https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=25-10-2020&q=Terborgseweg+18&loc=51.96316%2C6.295338%2C16z&overlay=mos-1
MVG
eggie
MxxCon (2021-10-25 20:01:47+00:00): If you can't select element that you want, there are a couple of ways of doing it. One is to temporary "disconnect" overlapping nodes, move one out of the way, select the other one, do whatever you need to do it and then move them back.
Alternatively, in iD/RapiD if you open Map Data panel (shortcut key F) and scroll down to Map Features section, and there you can (temporary) hide features that are interfering with your edits.
JayMontana36 (2021-10-28 18:49:06+00:00): Got it, thank you
Wipflord (2021-11-28 14:44:55+00:00): Hallo,

ich bin mit der Änderung "emergency=ambulance_station" zu entfernen nicht ganz einverstanden. Fahrzeuge und Material werden hier untergebracht, womit ich keinen Konfilkt mit den Einträgen im Wiki (deutsch/englisch) sehe.
Eine konkrete Notwendigkeit, dass emergency=ambulance_station auf einer Bestimmten Hierachieebene des Rettungsdienstes auf kommunaler, Landes-, Bundes- oder Verbandsebene angewiesen ist, sehe ich dort nicht.

Und ganz unabhänig davon: Durch das Löschen dieses Tags ist die Information, dass hier eine Rettungswache irgendeiner Form vorhanden ist, verloren gegangen.
Solange es also keinen passenderen Tag für eine "Hintergrund-Rettungsdienst"-Rettungswache (ich hatte kurz PN Kontakt mit dem Autor) gibt, plädiere ich dafür, die gelöschten Tags hier und anderswo wieder herzustellen.
Mathias_ADAV (2021-10-26 10:53:54+00:00): Hello,
thank you for updating ! Is it possible to add the tag cycleway = opposite or cycleway:left = opposite_lane tag in addition to the oneway: bicycle = no  In fact, this allows to know what kind of bicycle infrastructure is on the different streets. Thank you ! :)
salvoconducto (2021-10-26 18:47:27+00:00): Wuerden sie bitte gute changeset kommentare verwenden?
user_18023081 (2023-08-14 18:06:10+00:00): Why... just why?
eggie (2021-10-26 05:28:49+00:00): Beste nodiesel.. Ik begrijp werkelijk niet waarom die huisartsenpraktijken allemaal dubbel in OSM zouden moeten komen.
Ik draai deze wijzigingen terug.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust. 
Kijk eens op een regulier computerscherm voor het resultaat. OsmAnd voert niet direct z'n updates door. Dat heeft tijd nodig. 
MVG
eggie
SekeRob (2021-10-27 09:34:23+00:00): Puin moet geruimd worden en waar gewerkt wordt vallen splinters. Sorry, maar het was 'puin' voorheen (gewoon incompleet) en je fietsroute werd daarbij over het hoofd gezien. Drama, maar nu zijn de toegestane fietsrichtingen correct gemapped.

ciao
TomPar (2021-10-26 03:36:31+00:00): Hello.  FYI this parcel is actually owned by the town.  There was a couple of other parcels nearby with the same name/status according to MassGIS OpenSpace.  I combined, retagged, and stripped out the MassGIS tags.

MassGIS OpenSpace has this area as "Pheasant Brook" but I've seen on a town map that has it as "Butterfield Conservation Area.  https://www.lexingtonma.gov/sites/g/files/vyhlif7101/f/uploads/2020_across_brochure_20-08._final-2-fullsizemap.pdf

I kept it as the former.  But LMK know if you know any better.  Cheers.
kartonage (2022-04-27 15:44:21+00:00): Packstationen haben keine Namen. Aber gut, dass du die überall in Berlin (und anderswo) doppelt und dreifach eingetragen/automatisch anpassen lassen hast. Das gleiche gilt für Bank- und andere Automaten. 👎
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:15:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
O Fim (2022-01-28 12:17:39+00:00): Ola qual o motivo para exclusão da tag building , a importação foi feita em cima de dados oficiais da prefeitura de São Paulo, sendo que a mesma faz parte estrutural do edifício principal
Glassman (2021-11-12 01:07:33+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112959560
Rom1 (2021-10-25 21:06:23+00:00): Bonsoir, désolé mais il faudra tout reprendre car j'ai tout annulé pour rétablir les ways effacés... Passez à l'éditeur JOSM pour être plus sûr. Merci.
Aurélien Pierre (2021-10-25 23:11:23+00:00): Les effacements sont des fusions de bouts de route appartenant aux mêmes entités, qui sont ingérables à éditer par morceaux. Je ne recommence pas ce travail, j'y ai passé assez de temps.
Rom1 (2021-10-26 11:31:21+00:00): Encore désolé d'avoir dû tout supprimé mais je ne peux moi non plus passer plusieurs heures en correction. Regarder https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112959845 les fusions sont incorrectes : la Place des Marronniers et le Pont des Pierres.  Merci.
Aurélien Pierre (2021-10-26 13:54:38+00:00): Je ne comprends pas ce qui est incorrect. L'appli autorise la fusion automatique de sections qui ont les mêmes propriétés. Si elles ont les même propriétés, qu'est-ce qui s'oppose à leur factorisation ? Le fait est que ces départementales sont déclarées en sections anarchiques, des morceaux de quelques 100 m intercalés au milieu de sections de plusieurs 10 km, et toute opération de maintenance là dessus est une plaie.
Rom1 (2021-10-26 14:56:12+00:00): C'est là que l'éditeur iD en ligne n'est pas adapté pour manipuler des données aussi vastes. Dans cette visualisation https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112959845 on voit bien les deux lignes en vertes où les différents ways ont été fusionnés en un seul mais c'est incorrect. Par exemple, le way nommé Place des Marronniers à Manoncourt ne va pas jusque Andilly.
Rom1 (2021-10-26 14:57:55+00:00): S'il y a des morceaux intercalés de courte distance c'est bien qu'il y a une raison : par exemple un pont ou une portion intégrée dans une relation définissant un itinéraire (randonnée, bus...).
eggie (2021-10-25 18:12:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Normaal gesporken hoef je geen wegen te verwijderen uit OSM. Wanneer je de juiste accesstags aanbrent bv access=private zal zo'weg niet routeren.
Verwijderen is het andere uiterste. 
Het zal dan een highway=service met access=private kunnen worden. 
'k Denk in dit geval beter zo laten als het nu is. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
lyctkel (2021-10-29 08:49:27+00:00): Hi maarten2200,
I have some additions to Eggie's comment. You deleted parts of Faradayweg, because it is restricted.
In such a case you better  don't remove it, but mark it as restricted using access=private. If there is a gate, map it as well.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=private and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate

An example in the area could be found here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.98953/4.37086&layers=N
You and the rest of the world could see there, this is a private area with a gate and there is no access.
If you take a look at Google, they did the same: https://www.google.com/maps/@51.9849649,4.3687283,17.83z

The problem with removing things on Openstreetmap is, other mappers will see a road connected to the Faradyweg on satellite images and will map it again.
These mappers can't see the comment you made at the changeset. The information is lost and the road will have no restrictions again.

I have redrawn the road with propper restrictions and added a gate.

Have a nice day and regards,

lyctkel
maarten2200 (2021-10-31 15:09:49+00:00): Bedankt voor de hulp en feedback! @Eggie @lyctkel
eggie (2021-10-25 18:18:47+00:00): Top!  Ik heb alleen nog lane veranderd in parking=street_side en parking:orientation =parallel

MVG
eggie
Rico557 (2021-10-25 18:22:10+00:00): Школа им.Тизенгауза находится на площади Тызенгауза)))
4004 (2021-11-22 00:11:43+00:00): это все коллективный запад виноват
CoyKoi (2021-10-25 20:09:04+00:00): Hi Sam, welcome to OSM and thanks for editing the map with your local knowledge. I love Wild Wheat I'm happy to see it on the map now. Just a note that while deleting the businesses you have also inadvertently removed the physical building. It sounds like the building is still standing, so you could have left the building object (with a single tag 
building=yes), and removed the no longer relevant tags (amenity and healthcare). Not a biggie - the building outline just needs to be re-drawn. Thanks also for your descriptive changeset comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112960418
eggie (2021-10-25 18:24:08+00:00): Rocket.. Je zou nog eens kunnen overwegen of je wel al die tuinen rond de eensgezinswoningen 'moet' mappen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden

Er wordt verschillend over gedacht.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66660

Mapse,
eggie
user_10901495 (2021-11-09 14:29:50+00:00): Test per vedere se il markup per la descrizione dei profili funziona nella discussione dei changeset.

[Qui](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113480165)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Nordpfeil (2021-10-26 15:48:22+00:00): Hallo Lukas, Du hast in der Straßer Eller Kamp 
"maxspeed=50"
in
"30=50"
geändert.
Sollte das "maxspeed=30" werden?
cytryn (2021-10-25 20:53:10+00:00): To, co widać na zdjęciu to właściwie w ogóle nie jest droga. Tym bardziej, że parking kończy się krawężnikiem, więc nawet nie jest przewidziane, żeby wjeżdżać na ten odcinek. Chyba nie byłoby źle całkowicie usunąć ten fragment "drogi" i pozostawić tylko highway=footway w miejscu widocznego chodnika z płyt betonowych.
Dawid2849 (2021-10-29 19:30:19+00:00): może highway=path?
MFlamm (2021-11-18 08:07:50+00:00): Hello,
Why did you draw a residential highway above an existing service highway?
mten (2021-11-18 08:33:46+00:00): Hello,
The Chemin de la Redoute was not complete so I tried to extend it around the loop.
MFlamm (2021-11-18 08:48:37+00:00): Well, maybe you considered it was not complete because the loop itself was tagged as a "service=parking_aisle" (which are rendered with a finer line).
In changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113933651, I included a tag "area=yes" so the loop will render "filled". Does that correspond to your initial goal?
Badojo (2021-10-25 19:49:23+00:00): Please don't write names all in uppercase
Dzudza (2021-11-03 17:15:38+00:00): Uppercase neighborhood names are give to the bigger neighborhood/part of the city. Чаршија (Čaršija/Varoš) is the biggest and the oldest part of the city, which also includes several small neighborhood such as Рајчиновац (Rajčinovac) - his northern part around old orthodox graveyard with the same name, Бешлагића брдо (Bešlagića brdo), eastern part of Чајре (Čajre), western part of Шушњари (Šušnjari) and the area around mosque Трњак (Trnjak) known as Доња Махала (Donja Mahala).
Badojo (2021-11-04 10:17:56+00:00): That is not valid classification, for bigger neighbourhoods use tag place=suburb, for smaller use place=neighbourhood
Dzudza (2021-11-04 14:04:46+00:00): Noted.
Thanks for the feedback as well as for an advice.
trial (2021-11-04 20:14:54+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu(e) sur OpenStreetMap. le me semble qu'il manque maintenant un cheminement piéton pour passer d'un côté à l'autre de la rue.
bebop56 (2021-11-04 20:17:10+00:00): Tout à fait ! J'essaie de l'ajouter
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
shanhulittle (2021-10-26 12:51:35+00:00): 画湖心岛的话，先湖加上type=multipolygon变成关系，然后湖心岛设成在关系的inner部分中
Shaun das Schaf (2021-10-26 20:49:46+00:00): Hallo ABC_Schuetze,

statt "access=no" könntest du den Tag "highway=footway" zu "destroyed:highway=footway" ändern.
So würde der Weg/die Brücke vorerst nicht mehr angezeigt oder ausgewertet werden.

Wenn die Brücke irgendwann repariert wird, kann man das "destroyed:" einfach wieder entfernen.

Mehr dazu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-11-01 18:03:03+00:00): aqui voce retirou a propriedade que tornava esta linha uma avenida, por que fez isso? revertido.
Dulahey (2021-11-10 16:32:04+00:00): Why did you change sections of SH-37 in Newcastle & Tuttle from primary to secondary near signal lights only?  Was there a decision finally on being more specific with highway classifications?  (I haven't been paying much attention lately)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112964403
compdude (2021-11-11 03:47:08+00:00): Also why did you edit parts of OK 37 such that they now randomly jump between trunk and secondary?
Dulahey (2021-11-11 15:15:50+00:00): Furthermore, I'm seeing some speed limit changes that are incorrect.
dufekin (2021-11-16 02:22:27+00:00): OK-37 carries two lanes in each direction at a speed at least 50 miles per hour.  I didn't think of Tuttle as a proper terminus for a primary highway because of its relatively low urban population.  I initially thought of upgrading to trunk because of the multiple-lane, high-speed highway.  But the traffic signals suggested downgrading to secondary.  I thought that I successfully downgraded OK-37 to secondary from I-44 to Tuttle, but that change apparently never completed.  

I apologize for my mistake.  Obviously, the short segments of trunk aren't appropriate, especially the one between Mustang Road (OK-4) and Sara Road.
user_5359 (2021-10-26 07:36:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9001964984/history#map=19 . What is the meaning of currency=24z (the tag currency:CZK=yes is correct)?
BCNorwich (2021-10-27 06:30:45+00:00): Hi,
It would be good if you could correct/amend/remove sections of the highway=construction that your new York Road is laid over. As it is the new road in places duplicates the construction line and several times joins the construction line. 

Your new road seems not to connect to an existing in use highway at the SW end.

Regards Bernard.
◪ Jarv (2021-10-26 03:18:48+00:00): Is there really a no right turn restriction here?
voteforpedro (2021-10-26 11:39:06+00:00): That specific change within the changeset was accidental, I was meaning to look at the restrictions, not change them. I'll change it.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
MarBur (2021-11-25 17:33:02+00:00): Nevem sicer zakaj bi bila meja naselja v Mariboru problem. Večja težava je izbris ulic na studencih. Pekrska ulica je bila pred to spremembo povezana: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31752883
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112964859
◪ Jarv (2021-10-26 03:13:59+00:00): I reverted this CS in 112972876 due to it breaking bus route relations.
Please check to see differences between ways before merging them.
If a way has been split, there is usually a reason for it.
voteforpedro (2021-10-26 11:36:04+00:00): Thank you, I'll be sure to consider this going forward.
Carto'Cité (2023-04-05 14:49:53+00:00): Bonjour Jizou,
J'ai corrigé ces bandes qui seraient en fait des doubles sens cyclables en bande :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178780627
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/178780600
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996472231
N’hésite pas à me dire si tu as des questions ou des remarques.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
ivanbranco (2024-03-30 14:43:37+00:00): Hi EinEngener,

seems like you used webiste=* instead of wikimedia_commons=* on some elements by mistake, see: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Jiw
also the value is repeated in image.

I would fix website=* with wikimedia_commons=* using the proper syntax as wiki and delete image=* when duplicated. What do you think about it?
snikers89 (2021-10-30 11:03:24+00:00): Coś za szerokie te poprawki :) Zamieniłeś choćby nową asfaltową lokalną drogę, na leśną. Ten dojazd do Tocznabielu nieasfaltowy, ale to droga udostępniona publicznie, więc też zmiana na leśną według mnie błędny i mylący.
Tales2 (2021-10-30 21:41:22+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że nie zmieniałem dojazdu do Tocznabielu na drogę leśną, dlatego nie wiem, dlaczego tak sądzisz? - zresztą w historii tego nie ma. Nie wiem, o której drodze mówisz, że - zmiana asfaltowej na leśną.
snikers89 (2021-10-31 06:43:11+00:00): Tutaj ta asfaltowa na leśną - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997682773#map=15/52.7360/21.2284

Z pół roku temu robiłem tu nowy asfalt, a wczoraj patrzę że jest z powrotem track :) W historii była tylko Twoja zmiana, ale tak jak jest teraz, czyli tylko wersja #1 bez pełnej historii, więc dokładnie co tam się działo z tą drogą przez te pół roku to nie wiem jak sprawdzić :)

Z Tocznabielem było trochę inaczej, i jestem niemal pewien, że to po Twojej zmianie wskoczyło tam track zamiast czwartorzędnej, bo akurat właśnie przez tą drogę zwróciłem uwagę na te zmiany. Przesuwając akurat w tych okolicach mapę zmieniło mi się na oczach z białej linii na track, tam przy oddalaniu/ przesuwaniu wczytywało raz tak, raz tak, więc to musiała być świeża zmiana, no i twoja była właśnie ta ostatnia. No ale z tego co rozumiem, to zmieniałeś nazwy i dodałeś tą drogę pożarową 84, więc może tam coś za dużo scalone było do tej relacji.
Tales2 (2021-10-31 17:42:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/997682773# 
Cześć, na pewno jej nie zmieniałem z asfaltu na leśną - myślę, że albo to jakieś przekłamania pomiędzy programami, które używamy do edycji. Mogłoby być jeszcze jedno wytłumaczenie, że dodałem nazwę drogi na "Dojazd pożarowy nr..." i jeśli była tam nawierzchnia asfalt to zmieniłem na nieutwardzoną bo przejeżdżając tam drogą do Tocznabieli taka nawierzchnia była. 
Tak jak mówisz, ja również nie widzę historii zmian dla tej drogi, twoja edycja jest jako pierwsza, ale może jest to związane z tym, że wydzieliłeś ją teraz drogi pożarowej i traktuje ja teraz jako nową.
Też nie zmieniałem, żadnej rzędowości drogi, jedyne co zmieniłem to, że droga nie ma nazwy, bo wyskakuje mi, że jest to błąd gdy edytuję - i delikatnie geometrię. Po Twojej zmianie przedwczoraj, widzę zmianę w polu "highway" z "residential" na "unclassified".
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
fabiotofy (2021-10-26 06:33:12+00:00): Ma il Bennett non è sempre stato il 19f ?
PierZen (2023-05-28 02:47:08+00:00): Merci de collaborer à OpenStreetMap. A noter qu'il est important que la carte de base demeure neutre et ce n'est donc pas l'endroit pour exprimer ses opinions personnelles sur divers problèmes.  Je vous demande de modifier le nom péjoratif que vous avez ajouté à ces tunnels.
Himké (2023-05-30 02:57:54+00:00): Désolé, le nom est documenté dans Wikipedia mais pas noté dans mon commentaire.
MtnManMan (2021-10-25 20:49:28+00:00): Correction: Source used was Yandex Panorama
Strubbl (2021-10-26 19:09:27+00:00): Hi ZiCAD, with this changeset you doubled the ways. I removed the doubled ones with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113007232
ZiCAD (2021-10-28 09:23:03+00:00): Hi Strubbl, thank you. I had trouble with uploading from Vespucci, because the way has been edited in the meantime. Now it is fine.
Aurélien Pierre (2021-10-25 23:23:37+00:00): Ce parcours ne doit pas être référencé comme "cycling", il est dangereux pour les non-VTT et les GPS vont diriger les vélos de route dessus tant que l'étiquette cycling sera posé.
Aurélien Pierre (2021-10-26 11:09:26+00:00): Suite à ce changement, la piste n'est plus visible en "cycling" (voir https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13!48.9195!5.7593), ce qui est bien, mais pas non plus en mtb (https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13!48.9195!5.7593)
Aurélien Pierre (2021-10-26 11:11:45+00:00): Bref, merci de rétablir route=mtb
Rom1 (2021-10-26 11:21:43+00:00): Là mea culpa, je me suis trompé de tag. J'ai corrigé.
Axelos (2021-10-25 21:42:31+00:00): Bonsoir,

À propos des routes types voies vertes, il est documenté l’usage de l’attribut highway=path.

highway=cycleway représente une piste cyclable, c’est-à-dire une route exclusivement réservée aux cyclistes, ce qui n’est pas le cas ici.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes

Il faudra aussi corriger ce chemin :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793055175

Rien de bien dramatique, je vous laisse reprendre vos contributions :) Bonne soirée.