piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
AkuAnakTimur (2022-04-22 04:03:20+00:00): Whatevs, Microsoft Bing. Here's the link to my reference https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=6.342034~100.192126&lvl=17&dir=161.49&style=x&v=2&sV=1
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:02:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:01:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
pkoby (2022-05-01 12:59:14+00:00): I don't necessarily disagree with some of your classifications of these roads, but I think this might need to have some discussion and consensus. For instance, I would say St Paul and Calvert are secondary at least for their whole stretch. There are also a few bits that you seem to have missed in reclassifying on Calvert regardless.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-05-01 13:22:15+00:00): Yeah I agree - I got a bit confused at first trying to make sense of the highway classification guidelines but I think I've arrived at something that makes a bit more sense. Sorry to have left a mess here, I think Maryland, Cathedral, Charles, and Saint Paul should all be primary because they can't be decoupled from each other in the way they relate to the network, and Calvert and Guilford should be secondary throughout. Been mostly editing in West Baltimore but got surprised when I saw Howard was "minor unclassified" in Mt. V...

I have some ideas about how to propose this more formally drafted, I'll share that this week before doing anything more with it. feel free to revert anything or change it to something more sensible
pkoby (2022-05-01 13:31:45+00:00): Thanks for the detail. I never touched it because it's a terrifying mess... Also, people can be pretty uppity about classification and I still see myself as a recent transplant.

https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=1758bc7d89c34f3bb46fb3c43e6a8d8c has some classifications, but I disagree with a lot of them too (Howard I think is primary, not Minor Arterial compared to Saint Paul's Principal Arterial).
pkoby (2022-05-01 13:38:13+00:00): For now I'm making Calvert secondary down to Mt Royal, Saint Paul secondary between 25th and Mt Royal (could be primary to make it continuous), and primary for both south of Mt Royal.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-05-01 14:02:47+00:00): Alright, sounds good.

The classifications in that link are what I think a lot of the existing ones on OSM are based on, but the 2021 Highway Classification on the wiki almost seems to be subtly calling it out specifically as what to shift away from... they even use the phrase "highways to nowhere" to suggest that a situation like the isolated chunk of US-40 shouldn't be classified as a motorway just because it was built like one: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance

Before reading that I would have been inclined to have Saint Paul change classifications part way through because it does suddenly start to look like a literal highway closer to downtown, but the new guideline seems to suggest that this doesn't matter because it doesn't change the role in the network - after all people tend to be traversing it as a single corridor, not a street and a highway.

I was thinking a simple reference point for the primary + secondary roads is the designated "city gateways" (https://transportation.baltimorecity.gov/sites/default/files/City%20Gateway%2011x17.pdf) and the historical streetcar network. Baltimore was built as a streetcar town after all, and the transport network still mimics it in a lot of ways almost a century later, down to even bus stop distribution. Hence where Charles is primary, it makes sense for Saint Paul and Maryland to be too, since together they've carried the same bus/streetcar routes. It gets intangible but I think the result of those sources is something most locals would agree makes sense - like before I switched it, Pennsylvania Ave was secondary to Druid Hill and McCulloh but Pennsylvania would be anybody's first answer to what the main corridor that way is.
pkoby (2022-05-01 15:05:28+00:00): Great input. I agree that official or suggested designations don't always reflect real-world facts. I know some states have guidelines that state routes tend to be higher classification, which would make Saint Paul primary for its whole length, whereas Calvert is MD 25 only to North Avenue. I would say this is an accurate reflection of on-the-ground usage, but it's really tough.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-05-01 15:17:04+00:00): Right, and North Avenue I think is a safe cut off point for various changes since it's the boundary between the original core and everything else.

I've realized recently Baltimore is somewhat unique in that none of our roads which are nominally part of a state highway are maintained by the state, and route numbers are mostly unsigned. Part of what prompted me to look at classification was one of the OSM Americana maintainers pointed out most of the roads here tagged with ref=<route no.> should really be tagged with unsigned_ref, as having "US 40 Truck" rendered in larger text than North Ave itself doesn't really track with what's on the ground. I think mdroads has already done the work of identifying where the signage begins and ends
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:01:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Patr1k_P (2022-09-23 11:24:56+00:00): zmena povrchu sa znaci zmenou znaciek, nie kreslenim novej cesty...teraz su dve cesty na sebe
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Allison P (2022-04-22 06:32:32+00:00): You have already been warned twice not to use the description=* tag for advertising or similar copy. I have deleted it.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-22 05:30:06+00:00): 1. `=saddle` is different from `mountain_pass=`. It is low point on a ridge for example, not the highest point of a road. Cha Liu Au doesn't exist as such anymore. 
2. Even if you look at this official online map (which is a dubious practice), there are 2 Pak Kung Au labels. There are can be multiple roads passing a saddle, leading to muluple mountain passes. On HP1C, it marked north from the west  label, ie where I put it; there is no east label
Kovoschiz (2022-04-22 05:33:19+00:00): 2. south of where I put it, and the junction
Kovoschiz (2022-04-22 05:36:22+00:00): 2. I assumed the east label is describing the saddle (put besides for concern of label on printed maps). The west one is describing the actual mountain pass. I doubt the random FP marked on the government map means that label is referring to it.
minghong (2022-04-22 05:52:51+00:00): 1. For Cha Liu Au and Pak Kung Au, these 2 names appeared since 1970-73, and are used since then. They appear in official maps, including the countryside maps used by hiker. So it is better to keep the name and location to be exactly the same.

2. Customs Pass and Customs Hill disappeared since 1970. It is better to be kept as old_name or remove, to avoid confusion. BTW, Customs Pass is now the name of the residential area just next to the old Customs Pass.

See hkmaps.hk for references.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-22 06:09:50+00:00): 1.1 You shouldn't determine something out of reality based on directly copying other official maps. The `mountin_pass=` is already kept there, as it is a high point of the road (for the concept of trail intersection and rendering,  `junction=yes` already reflects it) . No `=saddle` exist there. You put something on hillside. 
1.2 My point is there are two concepts called Pak Kung Au, and there can be  two label positions exclusively or inclusively for it even in official maps. The `mountain_pass=` is the high point of a trail. The `=saddle` is to the east, beyond the end of the branching road.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-22 06:10:20+00:00): 2. I'm not talking about any Custom Pass, whatever it is.
HKHikerhang (2022-04-22 17:42:20+00:00): The deletion actions from minghong was a bit over, just my opinion. If there is no duplicate names nearby, and the names are somehere known by public, it is okay to keep on this map. No need to strictly stick on what it appears on govt's map.
Thierry1030 (2022-11-11 16:49:19+00:00): Hello,
May I ask you what's your source for the name of this service road?
Thanks for your reply.
Der Bierpuncheur (2022-11-12 13:29:51+00:00): That’s a good question. I don’t exactly recall which adjacent mapping system I referenced. I just went an checked three  of the “commercial” map sets and  google gives it this name, but Bing called it Zenneweg along with Apple. I looked at street level imagery again, and there are no signs. Perhaps we should just remove the name for now?
Thierry1030 (2022-11-12 20:30:48+00:00): Thanks for your reply!
On spot there are indeed no streetname signs.
And in the offical government dataset 'GRB' (available via geopunt.be) there's also no streetname visible.
I removed the name and added noname=yes.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:01:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-22 06:11:28+00:00): The `=suburb` (even if you disagree with it as a sub-district) is not the same as the demolished `=saddle`.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-22 06:12:15+00:00): Putting a `saddle` hillside is also meaningless.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-22 06:13:11+00:00): 3. Please don't copy directly from paper  maps. Their label position is affected by artistic choice and printed presentation.
minghong (2022-04-22 06:16:41+00:00): > Putting a `saddle` hillside is also meaningless. 
It is often done like way. This is because there is often a footpath or road that passes the mountain pass. For readability, the label is often put one either side of the pass.

For similarly reasons, the cape labels are often placed on the sea, so that the words won't cover the shoreline.
minghong (2022-04-22 06:19:15+00:00): >3. Please don't copy directly from paper maps.
map.gov.hk is not a paper map.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-22 06:34:35+00:00):  It is partially based on paper maps. It is also a single-layer online map, not an entire map database with many renderer and applications as OSM. You should not copy from any other map directly anyway. 
As I said, HP1C seems to contradict this. I haven't checked iB1000.  Different maps by the same source can be different.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-22 06:35:35+00:00): This positioning is therefore wrong in OSM. OSM is not a printed map. You put thing at where it is at exactly. Don't map for renderer.
unen (2022-05-05 08:38:21+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contribution. Can you please let us know of your sources for you to tag these shelters?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120030240
HKHikerhang (2022-04-22 17:44:43+00:00): The deletion actions was a bit over. In my opinion, if there is no duplicate names nearby, and the names are somehere known by public, it is okay to keep on this map. No need to strictly stick on what it appears on govt's map.
hanchao (2022-04-27 02:21:45+00:00): 不要添加无用的测试数据，已删除
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120236050
Syl (2022-11-10 19:18:51+00:00): Bonjour, où peut-on trouver des infos sur la D500 ? Je ne trouve pas de source pour confirmer son existence.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:01:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
LeonGo (2022-04-25 04:47:52+00:00): 手抖了啊兄嘚，宝能城那两条线检查看看，乱穿插了
hanchao (2022-04-27 02:17:45+00:00): 这个编辑资料太差了。直接回退了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120235972
MxxCon (2022-04-22 06:57:33+00:00): You didn't actually delete description tag😅
I fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120031195
Allison P (2022-04-22 21:26:18+00:00): Huh. Midnight editing will do that to ya...
mavl (2022-05-20 16:01:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
dpolovinkin (2025-05-09 06:43:40+00:00): hi, stumbled upon Trebinje, wonder - what's the reason of adding separate address POI on every building instead of putting it inside building tags? most of buildings there are distinctly separate, so should've been no problem?.. :)
dpolovinkin (2025-05-28 21:36:03+00:00): I see you made changes in OSM since my comment, did you see it? :)
Savo25656 (2025-05-28 21:44:22+00:00): Sorry, I didn't see the message. I want to check those addresses once more, after that I will merge them with the buildings. A lot of time has passed, but it will happen.
dpolovinkin (2025-05-28 21:53:20+00:00): thanks a lot! :)
mavl (2022-05-20 16:01:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
sampeto (2022-05-07 16:13:12+00:00): Hallo amstutpe
Du hast das Gemeindehaus Altdorf an der Bahnhofstrasse 13 erfasst. Das ist nicht korrekt, das Gemeindehaus befindet sich an der Tellsgasse 25, wie auf der von dir verlinkten Webseite ersichtlich ist. Ich habe das korrigiert.
Gruss, Sampeto
Kovoschiz (2022-04-22 14:58:42+00:00): What's wrong with the `natural=peninsula`?
Heinz_V (2022-09-06 19:31:20+00:00): You changed the NH183A. Please explain the reason. It is now against the official notification!
literan (2022-04-23 11:42:05+00:00): приветствую. для подъездов лучше использовать более точный тег entrance=staircase.

тут поправлю
solarisz (2022-05-10 17:44:01+00:00): Ups, das wollte ich vor Monaten zurück ändern, danke DD1JG. Im übrigens heiße ich Stefan und nicht Sockenpuppe. Mfg
mangerlahn (2022-04-29 11:33:01+00:00): Hi, 

vielen Dank für die Ergänzung. Die Radwege sind allerdings bereits an der Straße getaggt. 

Auf Cyclosm siehst du, dass diese nun doppelt vorhanden sind. (https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=18/51.33331/12.37452/cyclosm)
Da der Radweg nicht baulich getrennt ist, wird laut Wiki empfohlen, den Radweg direkt an der Straße zu taggen, statt eigene Pfade zu zeichnen. 
Genauere Infos dazu findest du hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Mein Vorschlag wäre daher, diese Änderungen rückgängig zu machen.

Viele Grüße
Max
ma-rt-in (2022-04-25 17:16:55+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Ich habe eine kleine Anmerkung zu deinen Änderungen: Du hast die Eingänge gesetzt, das ist gut, nur leider hast du die Adresse, welche teilweise bereits auf dem Gebäude lag erneut an die Eingänge gesetzt. Das ist überflüssig. 
Ich bereinige das für dich.

vg martin
Leo Slager (2022-04-22 19:13:25+00:00): Dag FrozenMilkshake,

De wegen zijn zo correct getagd.
De ketting kan ook op de kaart worden gezet:
barrier=chain is dan de correcte tag.
Je kunt dat verder opzoeken in de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
ivanatora (2022-04-23 06:30:01+00:00): Името на обекта е всъщност description.
За изоставени обекти може да се ползва abandoned: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:
Edison Wen (2024-07-18 12:34:23+00:00): 請問餐廳的名字為何？謝謝。
Supaplex (2024-09-25 04:20:19+00:00): 請問丹丹漢堡連鎖店真的開到楊梅了嗎？因為官網並沒收錄這家店
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9684715414/history
Supaplex (2024-09-25 04:25:11+00:00): 我們這邊檢視你的整個 changeset，發現應該是幻想編輯，因此整個回退

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157062987
user_5359 (2022-04-23 18:38:32+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag post:flats=7919713899?
Cheng-Chi Feng (2022-04-22 08:37:27+00:00): 哈囉，您可能還是初學者，這邊建議可以搜尋「餐廳」物件種類來添加相關點位，然後記得不要連接到道路，可以點滑鼠右鍵抽出點位喔！
opendcc (2022-04-25 13:48:14+00:00): Hallo,

interessante Situation: die Schilder vor Ort bezeichnen es 1x als Schmidham und 1x Schmiedham. Auskunft der Bewohner: ja mei, moi so, moi so.
mueschel (2022-04-24 09:34:38+00:00): Hi,
could you check which sockets are available at the two charging stations you added? Both of these keys are not used in other places:
  socket:AC~ 
  socket:CCS
brianboru (2022-04-25 09:47:28+00:00): Those are exactly the labels on each socket at the charging station. I'm not an expert so I couldn't match these to any of the prescribed tags.
mueschel (2022-04-25 10:08:58+00:00): Could you take picture when you pass by the next time?

"CCS" is a standard defining at least 2 different connectors. In the UK it's most likely a type2_combo. 
But I have no clue what an "AC" might be.
brianboru (2022-04-25 16:34:44+00:00): I took a photo when I surveyed it. How do I get that to you?
mavl (2022-05-20 16:01:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
batany (2022-04-26 14:37:25+00:00): Bonjour, 

cette voie n'a pas de nom, elle n'est pas la D149
legofahrrad (2022-04-24 14:13:11+00:00): Moin std90!
Willkommen bei OSM – Vielen Dank für deine Bearbeitungen.
Bitte beachte, dass Firmen, Unternehmen und jede andere Art von POI (Point of Interest) ein Haupt-Attribut braucht. Bei Gebäuden ist das zum Beispiel "building=*". Für Unternehmen passt häufig "office=company", du kannst aber auch nach anderen Typen im Wiki schauen, bzw. einen Suchbegriff im Editor eingeben.
Ich kann dir auch noch weiteren Lesestoff aus dem Wiki empfehlen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
Gruß, legofahrrad
PS: Bei Fragen melde dich gerne!
std90 (2022-04-25 06:43:20+00:00): Moin legofahrrad!

Danke für den Hinweis. Ich werde in Zukunft stärker darauf achten, wie ich die Änderungen einpflege und das Wiki zu Rate ziehen.

Viele Grüße
std90
user_5359 (2022-04-23 06:32:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the key building:min_level needs a number as value instead of yes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053866427/history
pesec (2022-04-22 10:09:21+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Данным пакетом правок вы добавили зданию тэг высоты, при этом указав значение "кулинария". В комментарии вы указали "Ателье".
Это ошибка.
johsin18 (2022-04-23 05:11:34+00:00): Clearly spam, reverted.
CJJ2501 (2022-04-22 08:52:16+00:00): Improvements to roads and sidewalks
GPar (2022-04-26 10:17:05+00:00): some tags are wrong. Example these buildings are not hangars: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279262957#map=17/40.62827/8.29287
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279266312#map=19/40.63239/8.29722
ivanbranco (2022-06-18 12:27:47+00:00): Hi Vid,

wikimedi_commons tag has a syntax to be followed as wiki, for example wikimedia_commons=https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/de/Santuario_di_San_Valentino_01.jpg should be wikimedia_commons=File:antuario_di_San_Valentino_01.jpg

Here the wikimedia values that you added if you want to fix them: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jri

Good mapping :)
canfe (2022-06-08 16:31:21+00:00): dovrebbe essere anche qui un ref e non name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120037716
PT-53 (2022-06-03 05:39:10+00:00): Hallo saltir00,

Straßen im Bau werden mit der Merkmal-Kombination 
highway=construction + 
construction=* (z.B. residential) 
gekennzeichnet. 
Du hast an diesen 3 Straßenabschnitten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496641976/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541772179/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/950091018/history
das Merkmal 
highway=construction 
in highway=primary abgeändert.

Wenn die Straßen fertiggestellt und für den Verkehr freigegen sind, muß auch noch das Merkmal  
construction=primary
gelöscht werden. Ansonsten funktioniert das Routing bei manchen Navis dort nicht.

Betroffene Straßenabschnitte::
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.02985&lat=47.81774&zoom=16&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways

Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-06-04 05:40:34+00:00): Erledigt, Danke
user_5359 (2022-04-23 06:36:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful. The key is building instead of building: and the key is for the building not for the nodes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9685022092/history
Violaine_Do (2022-12-16 22:51:22+00:00): attention aux doublons
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120039096
Austrianton (2022-04-25 01:21:56+00:00): This change-set looks like an accidental mass deletion on a large scale.

What happened here?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-22 13:45:52+00:00): Gracias por editar. Siempre que sea posible, también pondría las superficies de las nuevas carreteras :D
risturiz (2022-04-25 01:01:36+00:00): Supongo que te refieres a "surface"... La mayoria de las veces la imagen satelital no ayuda, aunque la mayoria parece unpaved
fabiotofy (2022-04-22 10:01:07+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro ? La banca dati ufficiale del Comune di Spilimbergo parla di Via Regina Passudetti. Lungo la via le tabelle sono ambigue, si vede solo R. Passudetti
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120039339
Glassman (2022-04-24 23:44:38+00:00): I looks like a driveway to me. The first part is shared but we still tag it as a driveway. Can you review this edit and fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120039390
mavl (2022-05-20 16:01:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-02 22:18:14+00:00): Why?