piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
UT93 (2020-04-06 11:43:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=kindergarten?uselang=de#Wie_kartieren.3F
frodrigo (2020-04-11 20:07:33+00:00): Hello, You should not create a relation of all relations of admin_level 6. Thus relation should be removed
Cuba municipalities (10964349, v1)
Cuba islands (10964212, v1)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories
Øukasz (2020-04-16 10:11:45+00:00): Just wondering, aren't these relations a touch too complex?
osmviborg (2020-04-06 12:18:04+00:00): Al håndtering af adresser (punkterne) sker automatisk, undlad at flytte, slette eller på anden måde ændre på adresserne. Se mere her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/autoAWS
woodpeck (2021-04-17 13:30:20+00:00): Hallo KartenKurator, woher stammen diese detaillierten Informationen inkl. Telefonnummer und VAT-ID? Sind die von außen sichtbar? Gibt es das Geschäft noch? Der Betreiber hat um Löschung gebeten, aber wenn der ein großes Schild draußen stehen hat mit diesen Infos drauf, dann bringt das ja nichts, dann trägt es der nächste gleich wieder ein.
Gonéo (2021-12-28 17:45:04+00:00): En faisant du ménage sur les arceaux à vélo, je constate qu'il y a une série d'arceaux importés par dessus des arceaux existants. Je supprime les doublons au fur et à mesure mais il aurait été mieux de vérifier avant d'importer.
Vinber (2020-04-06 13:35:08+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber (2020-04-06 13:37:35+00:00): peut-être pouvez vous délimiter l'ensemble ? et nous mettrons les bons attributs dessus !

Là vous avez mis le nom sur le auvent à l'entrée :)
On met aussi le parking et les batiments ?
J'aime bien ce CSC, je ne l'avais pas finalisé donc c'est l'occasion :)
ZldYe (2020-04-06 18:10:59+00:00): Dankuwel!
Vinber (2020-04-06 13:37:52+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber (2020-04-06 13:43:02+00:00): Pourriez vous me dire si les horaires correspondent aux horaires habituels ou "spécial confinement" ? Et si la boulangerie est ouverte ?
AurélienQ (2024-08-30 12:39:29+00:00): Bonjour,
Je rappelle que la langue française est d'usage en France et pas le basque. Le nom de l'attribut 'name' doit donc être en français. Merci de corriger.
Arrutic (2024-09-04 07:00:58+00:00): Bonjour,
l'article 169 de la loi 3ds https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/article_jo/JORFARTI000045197622
indique que c'est le conseil municipal qui réalise la dénomination des voies et lieu-dit.
Les adresses ont été publiées par la commune  sur le site national adresse.data.gouv.fr : https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/base-adresse-nationale/64477#11.79/43.17903/-1.3545
Les noms de lieu dit sont des éléments de patrimoine et pourquoi les traduire ?
Si vous faites référence à la loi Toubon, son objectif était plutôt de contrer l'anglais. "Les dispositions de la présente loi ne font pas obstacle à l'usage des langues régionales" (article21)
AurélienQ (2024-09-04 11:49:48+00:00): En effet je parlais bien des noms de rues, car vu que la traduction en français était indiquée, j'ai pensé - à tort - qu'un contributeur régionaliste a changé le nom français officiel pour le nom régional. Cela arrive malheureusement souvent sur OSM.

Toutefois je reconnais mon erreur, je m'excuse. Je n'avais pas connaissance d'adresses et de rues en France dans une autre langue que le français, par conséquent je n'ai pas vérifié la BAN. 

Par ailleurs ces lois sont intéressantes, j'en avais entendu parler mais je ne les avais pas lues. Merci donc de les avoir communiquées, rares sont les contributeurs qui sourcent leur argumentation (moi y compris).

Bonne journée,
Aurélien
EdLoach (2020-04-10 07:29:18+00:00): Hi Cliveb, I'm afraid I don't know the iD editor well enough to say how easy this is to do, but we usually put house names in the addr:housename field rather than name - if you compare the current rendering to see the name stands out more than usual, and perhaps look at Bloomsbury House to the north of Meadow View in iD to see how the two look different. Best wishes, Ed
Dino Michelini (2020-11-25 14:35:51+00:00): Ciao, nel costruire il reticolo idrografico non hai tenuto conto delle possibili intersezioni con le strade (ponti, guadi, ecc.); keepright evidenzia centinaia di errori del tipo "objects overlap" (https://keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=14&lat=48.20808&lon=16.37221). Puoi controllare e porre rimedio? Grazie
sorcrosc (2021-01-01 17:18:51+00:00): Praticamente con questo e altri changeset nello stesso periodo hai eliminato tutti i corsi d'acqua della Toscana e caricato i dati della regione?
Dino Michelini (2021-01-01 19:31:23+00:00): Considerato che non risponde, non  commenta mai i suo changeset e non si capisce cosa e come sta mappando credo sarebbe opportuno bloccare l'utenza. Sorcrosc che ne pensi?
sorcrosc (2021-01-02 21:47:57+00:00): Questo import non organizzato e chiaramente problematico era già stato notato:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2020-April/069463.html
Purtroppo nonostante le buone intenzioni è mancata l'abilità di rimediare agli errori e questa è un punto fondamentale nella pianificazione di un import.
A tal proposito inserisco comunque il link alle guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Credo che questo sia stato recepito ma mi piacerebbe vedere un segno di collaborazione. In passato già chiesto a Pab09 di commentare ma non ho avuto responso. Penso sia doveroso che lui inizi a prestare attenzione agli altri utenti spiegando le modifiche e inserendo sempre la fonte quando carica le modifiche: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source

Ciao
Lorenzo
ACarlotti (2020-04-06 18:22:36+00:00): There are a couple of issues with this changeset. Firstly, you've removed connections between the path and the road at the roundabout. This means that routers will no longer be able to use the paths for routing, as it looks like it isn't possible to rejoin the road (or a pavement adjoining the road) at that point).
Secondly, I cycled past here a couple of weeks ago, and at the time there was no accessible footpath on the west side of Robinson Way because it was part of a construction site. Has that now changed? If not, then I don't think a currently non-existent path should be mapped through the construction site.
aharvey (2020-05-04 02:29:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84587904 as suspected fabricated and/or spam.
aharvey (2020-05-04 02:29:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84587904 as suspected fabricated and/or spam.
tastrax (2020-05-04 01:12:42+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM - Cheers
aharvey (2020-05-04 02:33:07+00:00): I've reverted this changeset since the other changesets by this user appear to be fabricated and/or spam and so don't think we should be trusting this change. Indeed the OpenStreetCam imagery here does not confirm any Telstra office, telephone exchange or mobile tower and so likely this was also fabricated.
wireguy (2020-04-06 13:44:40+00:00): Thanks for the quick fixes!   
sport badminton?   I think it's probably tennis.
Keep you eye on the ball :-)
literan (2020-04-06 19:09:15+00:00): bad edit: https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CKuxZBP1 - тут 20 этажей. Откат
eggie (2020-04-06 14:22:46+00:00): Dag Chris.. De vraag is of dit wel allemaal klopt gezien de luchtfoto?
Is je bron ook een survey ter plaatse? 
Een track is geschikt voor voertuigen met vier wielen.
Verder loopt hier water en landuse door elkaar, maar dat is het "werk" van andere mappers. 
De vraag is dus of je dit hebt aangepast met lokale kennis? 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-06 14:31:21+00:00): Op de laatste sat foto zijn inderdaad weer een aantal gaten dichtgemaakt. Ik zal de landuse wat aanpassen. Ook is er een soort brug naar de Waalbandijk. De loop van het pad zal toch nog iets anders zijn. Puzzel hier ... :)
eggie (2020-04-06 15:35:40+00:00): Even een beginnetjes gemaakt van de reconstructie mbv satellietdataportaal. Rendering duurt even.. het project ter plaatse denk ik ook wel.
aharvey (2020-05-04 02:29:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84587904 as suspected fabricated and/or spam.
literan (2020-04-06 19:07:15+00:00): why private? there is free access to this small segment: https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CKuxa2ke
Sushant852 (2020-04-06 14:04:38+00:00): 1)Population Source 
https://www.census2011.co.in/data/subdistrict/4041-lakhani-bhandara-maharashtra.html
2) Villages Boundaries Source 
http://mrsac.maharashtra.gov.in/geoportal/
aharvey (2020-05-04 02:29:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84587904 as suspected fabricated and/or spam.
aharvey (2020-05-04 02:29:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84587904 as suspected fabricated and/or spam.
opendcc (2020-04-06 17:44:38+00:00): Hallo,

verläuft das unterirdisch oder sichtbar?
Frans S (2020-04-08 12:11:28+00:00): Hello Olha. Thanks for mapping here
a request. Please review the wiki about tagging highways. You tagged highways residential were unclassified or track was more appropriate and Unclassified ( small pieces in a hamlet) were residential was a better choice.
Bestregards
literan (2020-04-06 19:04:17+00:00): зачем-то вы тут поверх Лермонтовского сквера еще один нарисовали. Убрал дубль
Arun Madhavan (2020-04-06 15:08:42+00:00): I think they are wetland not Pond. Pls check. Difference is Pond often contain water. Wetand is an area which gets covered with water when there is heavy rain and then becomes land
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83150825
osm915 (2020-04-09 10:25:45+00:00): Hi Nepomuk0
wow, was du da für Details kennst (ich gehe mal davon aus das du ne zulässige Quelle verwendest).

Die Waldstückchen haben ja interessante Namen! Aber beinhaltet der Name wirklich auch noch eine Nummer (Flurnummer?).
Was würdest du davon halten, die Zahlen anderweitig abzuspeichern? Evtl. eignet sich der ref-Tag.

Freundliche Grüße!
P.S. Ich wäre dir dankbar wenn du etwas ausführlichere Änderungskommentare verwenden und ggf die Quellen angeben würdest.
Nepomuk0 (2020-04-09 13:13:40+00:00): Hi osm915, die Namen der Abteilungen ergeben sich aus den Beschilderungen vor Ort, sie wurden von mir persönlich erkundet (deshalb auch die Lücken). Eine andere Quelle habe ich derzeit nicht (nehme aber gerne Vorschläge entgegen).
Man kann sicherlich darüber diskutieren, wie und ob man die Abteilungen angibt. Ich habe hier aber das in dem Gebiet vorhandene „System“ nur fortgesetzt. Das schöne Waldgebiet ist recht groß und war bislang eher grob erfasst. Die Abteilungsnamen können in dem recht gleichförmig geschnitten Gebiet (viele ähnlich aussehende Schneisen) der Orientierung dienen. Deshalb hielt ich es für sinnvoll das weiterzuführen. Ein  ref. tag, wäre auf den üblichen Kartendarstellungen für Wanderer / Biker wohl nicht zu erkennen. Oder gibt es da eine Möglichkeit?

Ich habe Nummer und Namen angegeben, da diese nicht deckungsgleich sind (Die benannten Gebiete umfassen immer mehrere nummerierte Abteilungen). 

Bei der Kommentierung war es in dem Fall tatsächlich nur eine Namenskorrekur, da ich die Nummern zuerst vorne angestellt hatte und dann den Namen, später dann andersherum, um es einheitlich zu halten. Ich versuche aber mehr drauf zu achten.
osm915 (2020-04-09 18:41:08+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Antwort!
Ich finde solche Details auch interessant. Namen von Waldabschnitten liest man beim Wandern ja öfters mal, aber meistens kann ich die genaue Ausdehnung nicht so gut einschätzen (bzw. ich treibe nicht den Aufwand nach den "Grenzen" zu suchen ;-)

Aus meiner Sicht würde die Nummer nicht zum Namen gehören, aber wenn das vor Ort so steht wäre es auch i.O.
Kartendarstellungen sind idR übersichtlicher (und subjektiv schöner) wenn die POI-Namen nicht zu lang werden (oder im Namen gar eine Beschreibung verwendet wird).

Noch "schöner" wäre es wenn gleiche Namen nicht mehrfach nebeneinander auftauchen. Aber ohne leichten Informationsverlust (durch zusammenfassen benachbarter gleichnamiger Flächen/Gebiete und Angabe mehrerer semikolongetrennter Werte in der ref) geht das wahrsch. nur mit Multipolygonen - und ob die Sache das Wert ist, ist eher fraglich.

Laut https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=forest#combinations gibts die Kombination aus lu=forest und ref=* gar nicht so selten (aktuell 95256 mal) und mit overpass-Turbo findet man sogar bei dir in der Nähe einen Treffer (https://osm.org/way/61730881). Ganz so abwegig scheint das also nicht zu sein.

Was wie dargestellt wird, hängt halt von der Karte bzw. dem verw. Programm ab:
Ich bin meistens mit OsmAnd unterwegs, und das liefert bei vielen POIs auch die Informationen aus dem ref-Tag (auch bei Wäldern).
Bei zwei beliebten Online-Wanderkarten werden wohl noch nicht mal die Namen angezeigt (Ausschnitt zeigt den oben genannten way 61730881)
https://opentopomap.org/#map=16/50.01385/8.82918
https://www.wanderreitkarte.de/index.php?lon=8.8308&lat=50.0137&zoom=17

Danke für den Wandertipp - ich bin meistens im Spessart oder Odenwald unterwegs, aber wenn's da so schön ist, werde ich das mal in meine Liste der Wanderziele aufnehmen. 
Frohe Ostern und bleib gesund!
BCNorwich (2020-04-06 17:35:54+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Sorry to say you've placed the POI a long way from Shelton Street.  I don't know exactly where 71/75 is so can't move it myself. 
Could you please correctly position the POI?
Thanks Bernard.
CjMalone (2020-06-01 10:02:20+00:00): Hey, just to let you know you deleted some useful address data in this changeset.

n2833635810 could have just been tagged as disused instead of deleted. Keeping addresses in OSM helps with routing.
robbieonsea (2020-06-01 19:14:01+00:00): Fairly sure the addresses are available in the building outlines, so there's no loss of information.
CjMalone (2020-06-02 11:42:27+00:00): Node 2833635810 didn't have its address data on the building.
ilBepo (2020-04-28 08:00:21+00:00): hai aggiunto la ferrovia togliendo tutte le ciclabili!!!
Alecs01 (2020-04-28 14:25:49+00:00): Ma questa ferrovia/tramvia è veramente già in costruzione o è solo in progetto?
ilBepo (2020-04-28 15:03:03+00:00): Per ora è più un progetto, le ciclabili tolte sono ancora aperte, sono stati tolti interi tratti di collegamento con altre strade/ciclabili, sembra l'abbia messo cosi per divertimento, io toglierei tutte le modifiche apportate, una volta che inizieranno i lavori allora si cambierà, ma solo in quel momento
amadvance (2020-04-29 21:08:02+00:00): Bepo, ci pensi tu a ripristinare la ciclabile ? 
Grazie
amadvance (2020-04-29 22:17:52+00:00): Mamma mia che casino...
ilBepo (2020-04-30 06:26:55+00:00): Ci pensa Alecs01, chissà quali altre castronate ha fatto nel frattempo...
Alecs01 (2020-04-30 07:35:17+00:00): Fatto ora, c'erano diversi conflitti dal momento che sono passati vari giorni e altri hanno modificato la zona. Mi sembra non ci sia nulla di strano, date comunque un'occhiata se potete.
ceca2403 (2020-04-30 16:55:55+00:00): La tranvia non è un progetto. I soldi sono stati stanziati nel novembre 2019 dalla Ministra delle Infrastrutture de Micheli. Il cantiere era già iniziato a Pontesecco. Può controllare lei stesso post Covid. Le allego 2 articoli che testimoniano la veridicità dei fatti:

https://myvalley.it/2019/11/tramvia-sbloccata-la-linea-t2-bergamo-villa-dalme/

https://bergamo.corriere.it/notizie/cronaca/19_novembre_09/tram-linea-villa-d-alme-2025-125-milioni-annunciati-ministro-tutti-numeri-dell-opera-665c38dc-02d0-11ea-99f9-9c588e5b4be4.shtml

A presto!
Ceca2403
Alecs01 (2020-04-30 17:13:35+00:00): In una cosa hai ragione, non è un progetto. La gara per il progetto deve ancora essere fatta, questo dice l’articolo del Corriere. Altro che lavori in corso!
ilBepo (2020-04-30 17:47:01+00:00): Se leggi gli articoli da te stesso citati vedi che i lavori terminano nel 2025, quindi, stando ottimisti, le tue modifiche torneranno utili in quell’anno. Tagliare l’erba non vuol dire cantiere iniziato, cancellare ciclabili ora perché fra 5 anni passa un tram è totalmente inutile.
SomeoneElse (2020-05-01 22:15:02+00:00): (for the avoidance of doubt)
What should be in OSM now is what is on the ground now.  If right now something is a cycleway over an abandoned railway, then "highway=cycleway; railway=abandoned" is correct.  At the time when the cycleway is closed and people start relaying railway tracks, then "railway=construction" would be correct, but not before.
If anyone's got any more questions please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy, from OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-05-01 22:15:29+00:00): (per evitare dubbi)
Ciò che dovrebbe essere in OSM ora è ciò che è sul campo ora. Se in questo momento qualcosa è una pista ciclabile su una ferrovia abbandonata, allora "autostrada = pista ciclabile; ferrovia = abbandonata" è corretta. Nel momento in cui la pista ciclabile è chiusa e la gente inizia a trasmettere binari ferroviari, allora "ferrovia = costruzione" sarebbe corretta, ma non prima.
Se qualcuno ha altre domande, non esitare a chiedere.
I migliori saluti,
Andy, dal gruppo di lavoro sui dati di OSM.
Arun Madhavan (2020-04-06 14:50:21+00:00): Thank you for the contribution. The area around a school is marked as School Ground. I am making change
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83152218
Arun Madhavan (2020-04-06 14:47:43+00:00): I dont think there is a pond
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83152609
user_5359 (2020-04-06 15:16:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description as standard keys, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
MagnusA (2020-04-13 08:09:58+00:00): Thanks for making improvements to OSM!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83153000
zstadler (2020-07-04 16:18:34+00:00): Dear TWHB,

In this edit you have deleted two important relations: 1948518 and 1948505.

See "Separation Wall" at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Palestine_Related

Can you clarify if this was done by mistake or what is the justification for their deletion.

Best Regards,
Zeev
TWHB (2020-07-12 18:01:09+00:00): Dear zstadler,
I didn't know the intentions of the three separate relations. I thought they were just multiple relations describing one thing. So yes, this was done by mistake. 
Greetz,
TWHB
mapman44 (2020-04-06 15:41:00+00:00): Thanks for your edits. Just a caution...be careful when using Bing satellite imagery. It is useful primarily because it is newer that some others, but there is more distortion and very often objects drawn to it do not line up with the other satellite imagery providers. When using Bing (or any satellite imagery) be sure to adjust the image offset to line up with the existing streets before drawing new objects or making changes. Here's the Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83154256
A Common Porpoise (2020-04-06 16:12:16+00:00): I was thinking about this when making these updates. It seemed like some parts of Williams hwy matched, and others didn't, and many connector roads were extremely off or obviously just wrong (many roads were clearly far into fields, going the wrong direction, etc.). It could be localized distortion due to hills or imagery tile misplacement, or the roads are just off. It is a bit hard to tell. But this is a really good issue to bring up and I will consider it when moving objects around. I'm not sure of the best way to confirm road placement without additional GPS tracks, is it easy to see other aerial imagery to double check?
A Common Porpoise (2020-04-06 16:22:19+00:00): Update to above: I see it very easy to change background imagery in a desktop environment rather than on an iPad or iPhone. I will double check these.
mapman44 (2020-04-06 16:34:06+00:00): Good comments and observations! When I was a new editor I spent a lot of time moving things that really didn't need to be moved, and I figured that out once I learned to consult other imagery. Keep up the good work!
lmagreault (2020-04-09 19:22:59+00:00): à tagguer à part comme amenity=vending_machine ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83154601
Nzara (2020-04-13 07:16:10+00:00): Hi 
you have added a surface tag on way 757081278. I doubt your source 'survey'. This way has been razed last year. May your reconsider your change. 
Greetings.
imagoiq (2020-04-13 07:45:09+00:00): Yes, you're right. Actually I thought that I've cancelled the change in app (I use StreetComplete), but apparently not.
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 18:30:46+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?  Надеюсь в преть Ваши правки будут менее глобальными. Согласовывайте импорт, перетегирование и удаление тегов с местным сообществом. В противном случае будет откачено
Спасибо за понимание.
SomeoneElse (2020-06-22 12:54:49+00:00): Hello Cxioktsly0USVBswU8, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The comment above is asking you to not make world-spanning changesets.  You've just done that again in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86970496 - please don't do that.  Try mapping your local area first.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-06-22 12:55:17+00:00): 您好Cxioktsly0USVBswU8，歡迎使用OpenStreetMap。
上面的評論要求您不要進行世界範圍的變更集。 您剛剛在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86970496中再次完成了此操作-請不要這樣做。 請先嘗試映射您的本地區域。
最好的祝福，
安迪
SomeoneElse (2020-06-22 12:57:34+00:00): One more thing - can you explain the change that you made to http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=3815077900 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86970496 ?  They don't seem to make any sense.  Please do reply - if we don't hear back we may have to revert your changes back.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-06-22 12:57:57+00:00): 還有一件事-您能否說明對https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86970496中的http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=3815077900所做的更改？ 他們似乎沒有任何意義。 請回复-如果我們沒有收到回复，我們可能必須將您的更改退回。
最好的祝福，
Andy Townsend，代表OSM的數據工作組。