piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2019-02-06 16:46:47+00:00): там уже все отрисовано корректно, мультиполигонами. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9292351/history#map=19/55.55924/37.57756 вот мультик для правого здания. А разноэтажные части тоже каждый отрисованы своим мультиполигоном, например вот https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9292347/history#map=19/55.55966/37.57785 Вот инструкция https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/6804/51351719.14/0_a4c49_b0c6d619_orig (только там для обычных полигонов, но разницы никакой). https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=55.5596183&lon=37.5769775&zoom=18 - вот гляньте, на 3D-рендере здания разноэтажные
enotramone (2019-02-07 14:51:54+00:00): Спасибо, теперь понятно!
praeteritum (2023-08-16 04:29:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139942870.
praeteritum (2023-08-15 05:59:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139897679.
zstadler (2020-02-23 12:21:25+00:00): Hello BMM994,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668556706 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668563047
were added in this edit, but they have no tags. Is this a mistake or an incomplete mapping?
viloan (2019-02-05 21:07:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
praeteritum (2023-08-15 05:58:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139897675.
letihu (2019-02-07 21:21:24+00:00): Hier z. B. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6260732072/history#map=18/52.17443/11.62202&layers=N
sind viele Bäume in Gebäude gemappt worden. Da kann doch was nicht stimmen.Sind hier einfach Daten eingespielt worden?
tvbrene (2019-02-07 23:38:34+00:00): Die Bäume stehen tatsächlich dort noch nicht, sind aber in der Planfeststellung als zu pflanzende Bäume aufgeführt. Die Gebäude an den entsprechenden Stellen werden abgerissen. Man könnte natürlich darüber nachdenken, die entsprechenden Bäume als proposed zu mappen.
letihu (2019-02-08 08:57:53+00:00): Ich finde es nicht in Ordnung Dinge in OSM einzutragen, die es noch nicht gibt und aus irgendwelchen Quellen stammt. Hast du die Erlaubnis die Daten zu verwenden?
Ich würde lieber darüber nachdenken den Datensatz rückgängig zu machen.
tvbrene (2019-02-08 10:40:56+00:00): Es ist nicht "irgendwelche Quellen", es ist der rechtskräftige Planfeststellungsbeschluss, daher habe ich mich hiernach gerichtet: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=34494#p34494
Der Bau ist beschlossen und beginnt mit März. Trotzdem habe ich die Änderung erst einmal rückgängig gemacht.
letihu (2019-02-08 14:07:49+00:00): Rückgängig machen, finde ich gut.
Schöner Link zu einer Diskussion.
Ohne sichtbare Bebauung, oder wenigsten angefangen, mappe ich nichts. Schon gar keine Bäume, die noch nicht gepflanzt sind.
qwerty000000 (2020-07-05 09:14:16+00:00): Hi, it looks like you deleted almost all footways in the area? Was there something wrong with them?
eggie (2019-02-05 22:59:44+00:00): Dag FSC  het ziet er allemaal netjes uit, maar gebruik svp niet de BING als achtergrond maar de pdok luchtfoto 25cm.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-05 22:57:20+00:00): leisure park omgetagd naar garden.
Dit voldoet niet aan de definitie van een park. 
Het hele gebied is wel een park.
Leisure =park is een transparant die over een heel gebied ligt met water gras bomen.
Gr eggie
aharvey (2019-07-14 00:53:35+00:00): It looks like david jones was already mapped here at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4661347118, unless there are two within the same building, so I'll delete yours in favour of the pre-existing one. Please reply if that's an issue.
jakecopp (2019-07-14 05:55:09+00:00): Thanks very much for that, there is only one in the building. I must have missed the other one when surveying on foot with OsmAnd.
Omnific (2019-02-06 17:03:06+00:00): Great quality edits.
Minh Nguyen (2019-02-10 12:43:24+00:00): demolished:building=yes should be used in place of building=yes, not in addition to it. Thanks!
GinaroZ (2019-02-05 22:54:06+00:00): Hi, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668557964 a public recycling centre?
Abruzzzo (2019-02-06 00:30:58+00:00): Hi Ginaro,
I think it's this one: https://viridor.co.uk/our-developments/glasgow-rrec/
eggie (2019-02-05 22:52:26+00:00): Svp geen gebouwen veranderen. Alles is ingemeten.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-05 22:45:16+00:00): Beste FSC,

De BING achtergrond ligt behoorlijk verschoven. gebruik svp de pdok 25 cm luchtfoto.
Alle gebouwen zijn ingemeten door het Kadaster en alszodanig geimporteerd. het is dus beter om niet gebouwen te verplaatsen.
Graag ook concreet commentaar bij je edits. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-05 22:50:29+00:00): Gebouwen teruggeplaatst
eggie (2019-02-05 23:10:45+00:00): Wanneer je gebouwen in het algemeen en zeker flatgebouwen gaat positioneren met de omtrek van het dak liggen ze zeker niet meer op de plaats waar ze horen. Het gaat om het maaiveld. Luchtfoto's worden niet loodrecht genomen. .. en dan ligt de BING nog verschoven.
Gr Eggie
Jez Nicholson (2019-06-01 13:05:35+00:00): Thanks...but the Holler is here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6137657556
highflyer74 (2019-02-06 07:40:14+00:00): Moinsen! Danke für Deine Arbeit! Kleiner Tipp: old_amenity=* gibt es als Tag nicht, old_name=* hingegen ja :-) Viele Grüße!
highflyer74 (2019-02-06 07:43:34+00:00): Schon wieder ich: auch old_shop=* gibt es nicht. Wenn Dinge nicht mehr vorhanden sind, nutze am besten das https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix, um die Dinge zu kennzeichnen. Das wäre dann z.B. disused:shop=clothes. Diese Methode hat sich als quasi Standard bewährt. Danke!
datamongers (2019-02-19 12:57:07+00:00): Im not a fan of this change, I think it makes the map less useful. Every map of Yellowstone i've ever seen that shows backcountry campsites uses whats now the ref, not the long name, The short names are also used by when booking a backcountry permit. I dont think i've seen any software that makes use of the ref tag on a campsite.
datamongers (2019-02-19 12:59:51+00:00): i see now that there is 1 piece of software that does use the ref tags on campsites, your website.
giggls (2019-02-19 20:43:30+00:00): Refering to other objects in Openstreetmap ref is usually the correct thing for stuff like this.

I did not invent the names. They are also called "name" in the official document I refered to in the changeset comment.

So what else would you suggest? I do not think that removing the real names from name tag alltogether would be a good idea. Actually I thought about putting the numbers into name tag in addition to what the document calls name, but frankly, that's actually what ref is for.

Sven
giggls (2019-02-19 21:08:59+00:00): Ah, one more thing. Did you read my blogpost? http://blog.gegg.us/2019/01/announcing-open-camping-map/

Tagging of campsites in US National Parks would need a lot of love!
highflyer74 (2019-02-06 08:02:23+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Vielen Dank für Deine Arbeit! Kleiner Tipp: Wenn Du Gebäude einzeichnest, mache sie danach bitte rechtwinklig (wie sie ja auch meist in Wirklichkeit sind). Das kannst Du in jedem Editor per Knopfdruck machen.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Glassman (2019-02-06 16:44:04+00:00): I think you may have inadvertently removed the tag shop=bicycle since the name you added is Oly Bikes. I added it shop tag back.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66947076
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-24 06:27:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/265301805/history - this wikidata entry is about shop, you added it to building without shop tags

Is it intentional?
Edward (2024-01-19 21:48:58+00:00): Thanks for your comment, sorry for not replying sooner. I've added a node to represent the shop and moved the wikidata tag from the building to it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11532176101
geomaniX (2025-05-13 06:07:18+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier die Praxis Dr. Ehling in die Elionore-Stein-Straße geschoben, die Adresse allerdings bei der Armlandstraße belassen.
Ist der Arzt auch umgezogen oder war das Verschieben gar nicht beabsichtigt?

VG geomaniX
viloan (2019-02-05 23:11:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
Glassman (2019-02-06 16:47:31+00:00): Thanks - We need more people fixing up golf courses. Let me know if you need more info on how to edit courses.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66947957
Something B (2019-02-06 10:24:11+00:00): Здравствуйте!
 Название пишется без кавычек.
Something B (2019-02-06 10:32:20+00:00): P.S. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6260896021 - что это? Возможно, следует добавить amenity = camp_site.
Something B (2019-02-06 10:37:02+00:00): P.P.S.  Не amenity = camp_site, а tourism = camp_site (ошибка с моей стороны).
Something B (2019-02-06 10:22:45+00:00): Здравствуйте!
 Тегом highway = services обозначаются сервисные станции. Перевалы обозначаются тегом "mountain_pass = yes".
С уважением,
 Something B.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
JesseFTW (2020-09-15 03:00:04+00:00): I don't think this is correctly tagged; this does not seem to be any type of aerialway.
joost schouppe (2019-02-06 20:55:58+00:00): "Relicto de Bosque" es alguna typologia, no? EN este caso no hay que poner en "name"; vea https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Names&uselang=en#Name_is_the_name_only
SantGon (2022-03-04 18:47:05+00:00): Rua 106 na verdade é Rua 108
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
RicoElectrico (2019-07-31 05:00:07+00:00): Cześć, czy Twoje edycje w tym parku rozwiązują uwagę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1399236 i można ją zamknąć?
Wampcia (2019-07-31 11:55:04+00:00): W/g mnie tak.
RicoElectrico (2019-07-31 11:55:54+00:00): Ok, zamykam tę uwagę :)
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-06 02:04:10+00:00): Hi, I'm not sure if you meant to do it, but you accidentally expanded the pond in Pine Street Park to cover the entire park. I fixed it for you.
Truchin (2019-03-25 08:58:57+00:00): J'ai l'impression que tu as confondu piste et bande. En l’occurrence, la continuité cyclable était bien présente sous forme de bande sur la voie principale. Par contre, elle n'existait plus à l'intersection avec l'avenue Jean Moulin.
J'ai tout rectifié.
Bonne continuation 

Thomas
ThierryOSM (2019-03-25 17:34:31+00:00): Ah ok. Il est vrai que par endroits il ne subsiste que l'idée de la piste cyclable...celle ci c'est transformée en bande !
Aleks-Berlin (2019-02-07 09:10:06+00:00): Hi wambag,
what means tag "\" = "4" ??
Thanks, Alex

PS: I found it via https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/characters_in_keys#problem
wambag (2021-03-06 11:07:46+00:00): Probably was a typo. Since I don't know which object it was on and it does not appear in taginfo any more, I can't fix it
Aleks-Berlin (2021-03-06 11:31:29+00:00): Thats ok.
stay healty
pitscheplatsch (2019-02-07 18:21:31+00:00): Hi René Arcand, welcome to OSM.

Please use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits. Thanks. 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
aceman444 (2019-02-22 23:47:46+00:00): Please do not create changesets across all of Europe that can't be loaded due to large area. Thanks.
B_KSL (2019-02-23 05:19:23+00:00): Will be done
pyram (2019-02-09 13:38:30+00:00): Review:
What do you want to say with "closed". This is just the crossing-node of two roads.
b-jazz (2019-02-12 18:40:04+00:00): Hi there @thefra. A couple of things that new mappers should be aware of: 1) try to make smaller changes that don't span large geographic areas. 2) ways shouldn't zigzag all over the place. they need to reflect "ground truth".

I've deleted several of the ways that you've created as they make no sense.
Horza (2019-12-08 00:30:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/96828123

This node is on a street and says nothing about it other than artwork. Is this a misplaced node?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:36:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-06 05:07:50+00:00): What's with the name of that creek?
Agent Zapdos (2019-02-06 05:10:30+00:00): It's a local nomenclature that's been floating around town for decades.  It's called this because it smells really bad.  I can alter the spelling so that it's phonetically similar.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-06 05:44:21+00:00): Ah, I see. I'm not sure what the best course of action is in this case then. Does it have a formal name?
Agent Zapdos (2019-02-06 05:45:53+00:00): Possibly?  I don't know.
GeoJess (2020-06-16 18:44:26+00:00): Hi, I believe the best solution is to use the loc_name key. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name#Values
seattlefyi (2019-02-07 00:31:32+00:00): Hi, and thanks for the edits! It appears that yes, Railroad Way South is currently closed, but I've read on the wsdot site that it is just planned to be closed for 1-2 weeks after the tunnel opening, then will be reopened as a local-access only road. If so, tagging it as abandoned and deleting turn restrictions for it may not be correct. Have you heard differently? Thanks again.
literan (2019-02-06 10:40:24+00:00): когда же вы наконец перестанете делать это
Алексей Соловьев (2019-02-06 11:49:21+00:00): Не помню когда, но раз есть, значит регился. Тем не менее - "когда же вы наконец перестанете делать это" это вы о чем?
literan (2019-02-06 12:12:04+00:00): Вписывать в тег name описание объекта "Адвокатское бюро г. Москвы «Диаметраль»". По правилам, там только "Диаметраль" должно быть, а полное описание - в другие теги. Впрочем, возможно, это мапс.ми за вас регулярно эту правку заново шлет ))
Алексей Соловьев (2019-02-06 12:31:01+00:00): Аааа, век живи, как грица)) Ок, постараюсь впредь учесть!
Alhamdulillah (2019-11-27 21:34:43+00:00): The Wikidata value is already at the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6099393
Please avoid such duplicates in future!
ParagonPrime (2019-11-28 03:11:41+00:00): feel free to open a suggestion or offer a fix at https://github.com/EdwardBetts/osm-wikidata if you feel that there is a more accurate way the wikidata could be tagged.
magtanggol03 (2019-02-06 08:59:02+00:00): Thanks binkymilk!
magtanggol03 (2019-02-06 08:56:54+00:00): Thanks for the addition!
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Settlinggone (2019-02-06 12:12:53+00:00): Hello, please look closer, those are not private yards.  That is a shared area the local community uses for recreational purposes.  There are many similar places marked already such as here,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=20/43.23650/-79.92369

or here,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=19/43.25007/-79.92979
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-06 23:03:57+00:00): I'd argue that 511321899 isn't a park either - how is it "an area of open space provided for recreational use"? It's a footpath between blocks with a strip of grass on either side.

In this case, you added (varying combinations) 3 parks all in close proximity to one another - are you saying the park you added to what is clearly the front lawn of house #35 Gilcrest Street is a park?
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-02-06 16:33:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок изменил статус дороги  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668414021/history  
  
Дороги класса highway=track - это лесные и полевые дороги. Здесь же не полевая дорога, а дорога возле огородов.  
highway=service больше подходит для такого проезда.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
CmdrThor (2019-02-06 07:00:12+00:00): I see you have review_requested on this changeset, but I'm assuming you're not done with this edit, right?

Just asking since both the O'Fallon & St. Peters relations are now broken and misaligned in some places. Also Old Knaust Rd has been knocked out of alignment.

And, don't trust the county map completely(if that's what you're working off of) as it is wrong in multiple areas. I had already gone through the St. Peters relation and it is(was) 100% accurate according to city records (Which are more up-to-date than the county's records).

Relations can be very tricky to work with (Especially since you're using iD, which I don't believe has full relation support), so let me know if you need any help with modifying them.
localfixerupper (2019-02-06 18:34:48+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for replying.  Yes, I thought someone had better take a look at these since it was my first time trying my hand at editing boundaries.  I get thje theory behind inner and outer relations.  It's just a matter of getting them right and it is very hard with iD because you can't see the whole relation at once.
This whole episode started when I was looking at a couple areas in OSM inspector.  It said that there were a few touching rings and I thought I could fix them.  Then I noticed that the Tiger data lines from 10 years ago had boudaries running all over the place through back yards and across neighborhoods.  I thought, well I can't fix anything until the lines are in the proper position, so I started aligning them to better see what was going on.
And yes, I was using the online county map as a guide.  When I click on parcels there It tells me when they were last updated.  And it was only a few days ago.  And if maps don't agree, then it becomes a matter of who is right and who is wrong.  I would think that the county would be the proper authority, sisne that is where deeds are recorded.  After getting your message, I did find the online St. Peters map and there are slight differences.  In the future, I will compare the two and resolve any differences before making any changes I can't find info on when they update theirs. And when I click for parcel info on the St. Peters map, it links to the county map. What leads you to believe that theirs is more accurate?
I did download JOSM and am trying to learn how that works.  But the way OpenJDK renders it, it is kind of hard to use on my system.  (Fedora 27). It probably needs to be updated, but I like to get things from the repo and I just have to wait for them. 
As for being done, where I am right now, it's kinda like debugging a script.  You think you might be done, but you don't know for sure until you run it.  Then if there's bugs, you try to squash them.  And the only way I see to run my changes is to upload them.  Then wait 24 hours for Geofabrik to come out with their daily .obf, build it with OsmAnd Map Creator and see what I've got.
If you could tell me if there is a tool I could use to check changes before I upload them, that would be a big help.
In the meantime, if you could point out exactly where I made the relation mistakes in my last edit, I would be happy to try to fix them.  Otherwise if you just want to patch them, you certainly have my permission, and it won't hurt my feeling a bit LOL.
As for Old Knaust Road, yes I had to move it out of the way to get to a boundary I had to move and forgot to move it back.  It will be fixed with my next upload.
On balance, I think the changes I made were an improvement in the O'Fallon region.  I tried to stay away from St. Peters because I noticed you had just finished that. But it does touch O'Fallon in some places. I am sorry if I messed something up.  But if I don't try things, I'll never learn. Thanks for the help.
CmdrThor (2019-02-07 07:04:18+00:00): I shot you a private message as the complex formatting and hyperlinks that my reply has aren't really supported in changeset comments.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mueschel (2019-02-07 18:56:33+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag "mimuPcode" you added to all these nodes?  If it is a reference number, the key should be something like "ref:mimu".

Jan
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
divakartu (2019-02-06 07:08:05+00:00): http://divakartu.com/