piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vinber (2021-11-04 11:13:56+00:00): Bonjour,
il y a cela https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration
Avec ce passage **Instead we only put commonly used names in other languages into the database.**

il y a aussi cela je pense
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Noms_multilingues#France

**Français fr (ne doit pas être utilisé sur le territoire de la République française)**

même si sur ce point, je pense qu'il y a quelques exceptions pour des communes basques (pour ce que j'en connais) qui ont décidé un double affichage des noms de rue avec le name en basque et donc le name:fr pour la seconde langue affichée.

En résumé, je dirai que les name:XX ne sont pas là pour faire de la traduction mais pour mettre les noms utilisés dans les langues correspondantes. Ce qui au passage me fait aussi me questionner sur pas mal de name:oc=* qui me semblent être seulement des traductions et pas des noms réellement utilisés.

Merci pour cet échange :)
Vincent
BotaFlo64 (2021-11-04 17:49:01+00:00): Ok, j'arrête de traduire, désolé.
bonne continuation
Florent
Vinber (2021-11-09 22:25:53+00:00): pas à être désolé, vaiment, cla m'a permis de creuser pour ma part et de mieux comprendre ces questions justements. Cela réinterroge d'ailleurs sur quelques contributeurs qui ont la traduction occitane un peu systématique et je crois que cela me permet de mettre des mots sur ce qui me dérange, à savoir je pense que c'est souvent de la traduction et non pas de l'usage !
Merci de tes contributions
Jean-Noël Pédeutour (2021-11-11 20:29:15+00:00): Bonjour,
La traduction en occitan correspond tout de même dans certains villages à un affichage bilingue des noms de rue, comme on peut le voir plus fréquemment au pays basque. De plus, les locuteurs riverains emploient ces noms-là quand ils parlent de leur rue - et aussi très souvent de leur maison - en occitan.
Cordialement,
Jean-Noël
ForestFurnace (2023-07-06 17:44:54+00:00): Is this still a path? I have tried to find it on several walks in 2022 and 2023, winter and spring, and there is no break in the bushes. Google Streetview in 2019 also shows a continuous hedgerow.
GinaroZ (2021-10-15 20:39:54+00:00): Was updating this area and noticed this road was set as removed - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718464024 - however on the latest Maxar imagery there seems to be some sort of road/path there and this map shows it as a cycle path: https://www.transport.gov.scot/media/48142/a9-dualling-luncarty-to-pass-of-birnam-new-cycle-and-pedestrian-paths.pdf
Do you the exact situation?
tms13 (2021-10-19 16:17:49+00:00): It was marked proposed:highway=no, so I removed on that basis.  Feel free to resurrect it if that was wrong!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
StefanHRT (2021-09-29 16:56:04+00:00): Hallo,
Bitte verlass Dich nicht einzig auf die Bing-Karte, die hat öfter mal einen Versatz drin. Im Bildmaterial vom iD gibt es auch die offziellen Berlin/Geoportalbilder (DOP) von 2020 und 2021 sowie auch die ESRI Weltbilder (Klarheit), hier bitte immer auch diese Karten vorrangig nehmen ;) VG
litLizard_ (2021-09-29 17:21:01+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Bin neu bei OpenStreetMap!
StefanHRT (2021-09-29 17:35:08+00:00): Deswegen gebe ich Dir ja den Tip ;) VIel Spass beim mappen und wenn Du Dir unsicher bist, hilft die Wiki gut.
litLizard_ (2021-09-29 17:38:24+00:00): Danke!

LG!
Jrachi (2021-10-05 09:26:50+00:00): Ciao.
Ho notato uno strano gruppetto di sentieri con un tratto rettilineo anomalo.
Credo che tu abbia spostato un tratto di sentiero (Percorso: 121851620)
Un errore che può capitare quando si lavora molto!
Ho fatto lo spostamento a mano. Controlla se sono riuscito a correggere correttamente.
Ciao, Ivo
solitone (2021-10-05 13:17:40+00:00): Non me ne ero proprio accorto, grazie! Adesso quel sentiero sembra posizionato perfettamente. Ciao!
skorasaurus (2021-12-05 16:37:09+00:00): thank you for adding all of the detail here; looks great!
kepivar (2022-08-21 07:40:56+00:00): It was wrong to add landuse=forest to a _park boundary_
catlover1995 (2021-09-29 16:58:37+00:00): So you are removing the posiki data. I love it! i always hated it because it would take so much storage space and it looked so bad. so cool that you have a script to remove them! cant wait for all of finland to be removed of that bad data.
posiki (2021-09-30 17:28:34+00:00): You are welcome! Sorry about all hassle. I just remove those forest plots which I have imported and nobody has been edited. Finland will still have very bad forest plots after this reverting.
catlover1995 (2021-09-30 18:02:09+00:00): I'm sorry for being so harsh on you! I just noticed you were the creator of them. What I meant was that they were cool when they came but it became kind of annoying when it clipped over user created farmlands or other land uses and added sometimes these areas without forest in the middle and of course more storage space was taken. And yes I also noticed that all the corine data will still stay with us so I guess it's not all good yet. So I guess it looked good on paper but not really so good in practise.
Enock4seth (2021-10-13 14:02:04+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The name of the Bakery is probably not just "Bakery" but >Something< Bakery. If you don't know the name, kindly leave it blank. The tag `shop=bakery` - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbakery is enough 

LearnOSM - https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/ is a good starting resource
Ars-UA (2021-09-29 17:40:32+00:00): По Зелинского адреса дублируются. В Мариуполе несколько таких улиц.
impiaaa (2021-09-29 18:48:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your contributions. Please consider using more descriptive changeset comments, so that other mappers can know what you changed at a glance. It doesn't have to be detailed, something like "Add access restrictions to paths," but  just "updates" doesn't really say what changed or why. See here for more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Akiba220 (2021-09-29 20:06:27+00:00): Okay no problem. I will do so going forward.
VictorIE (2024-04-03 10:38:55+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372124632/history

This is tagged with addr:housenumber=39 and nohousenumber=yes
PubUpdater (2024-04-06 06:05:05+00:00): Hi, I see b-unicycling removed the house number. The reason I added it is because the address associated with the Eircode had a house number.
Nordpfeil (2021-09-30 11:47:15+00:00): You tagged "graden=360". If this should indicate the direction in which the camera is looking (360=strictly to North), I recomend to use "camera:direction=360". 
If you want to say that the camera is looking in all directions, than I recomend to use "Camera-direction=0-360"
Thomas_Schills (2021-09-30 16:22:08+00:00): Thanks. I didn't find the tutorial to fill the information. 
Indeed, it is 0-360
martien-176 (2021-09-29 17:54:46+00:00): Note to self: commented this changeset in https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/11553/tasks/?search=456
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111877504
eggie (2021-09-30 06:20:41+00:00): Dag Wetterhorn..
Nieuwbouw niet zelf intekeken svp, maar laten importeren als dat nog niet periodiek is gedaan.
Dat Verzoek doe je in het draadje Verzoek BAG import via het forum van OSM.
Doe je dat zelf?
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=842410#p842410
Inlog identiek aan osm account,
MVG
eggie
Wetterhorn (2021-09-30 06:30:18+00:00): Ah, dat wist ik nog niet, dankjewel!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 15:54:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2905817735/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this edit
shop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - though maybe new one is needed)
benoitdd (2021-09-30 15:13:44+00:00): the city name should stay on the node (if the traffic sign has an other name please change it, but do not remove existing data if they are not wrong) : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_sign%3Dcity_limit
abakus_uploader (2021-09-29 22:31:00+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ivanbranco (2021-11-14 13:51:53+00:00): Hi danieldegroot2,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/858932177/h
what's the meaning of phone:vandalism=* ?
danieldegroot2 (2021-11-14 15:47:28+00:00): Hey Ivan,

The following are ATYL tags
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ATYL
equipment:advisory - for suggested equipment.
equipment:mandatory - for required equipment.
phone:service - for reporting damage to the pumptrack.
phone:vandalism - for reporting vandalism (i.e. noise). It is a police number which is explicitly stated to prevent people from calling the service or police emergency number (112), as they can't intervene.
It could alternatively be left out.

The pumptrack does not have a phone number for general information, as far as I could find, as such contact:phone=no

All information can be found on the website and a sign next to the entrance of the pumptrack.

Regards,

Daniel
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-10-07 13:10:21+00:00): bom dia victor, provavelmente esses pontos onde voce inseriu "batalha ..." tem de ser removidos, pois eventos não devem ser mapeados no mapa.
VictorAlves97 (2021-10-07 13:36:47+00:00): Bom dia, faço parte do grupo de pesquisa da Universidade de Brasília liderado pelo professor Dr. Jorge Henrique Cabral Fernandes do departamento de Ciência da Computação em conjunto com os departamentos de Jornalismo e Biblioteconomia. Nosso projeto busca documentar sobre o cenário do Rap no Distrito Federal. Todas essas batalhas que inseri não são eventos particulares nem nada do tipo, se tratam de locais onde grupos de artistas se reúnem para promover cultura e entretenimento por meio de batalhas de Rap. Não acho que deveria remover os locais inseridos por mim.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-10-07 13:56:59+00:00): as pistas de skate tudo bem, são lugares, mas batalhas, nao
Wetterhorn (2021-09-29 20:26:20+00:00): Ooops, I broke 'Vijver 7' in this edit :-(

Who can help and fix?
eggie (2021-09-30 06:12:39+00:00): Fixed....
Oorzaak .. self intersecting ways vlakbij de brug.  Zie... 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111885128

MVG,
eggie
Wetterhorn (2021-09-30 06:28:52+00:00): Thanks!
charl3s (2021-09-29 20:20:20+00:00): source: https://www.orlenpaczka.pl/pokaz-punkty/
Mordechai23 (2021-09-30 11:43:16+00:00): na pewno nie powinno być "automaty paczkowe" w nazwie, bo to wynika z tagów. A to Orlen Paczka to też nie byłbym tak przekonany, paczkomatom inpostowym wcale nie dajemy nazwy
maraf24 (2021-09-30 15:44:14+00:00): 
Ten import był gdzieś przedyskutowany?
Źródło na licencji zgodnej? Na dole podanego źródło jest "© ORLEN S.A. Wszelkie prawa zastrzeżone."
charl3s (2021-09-30 18:59:56+00:00): wycofałem
maraf24 (2021-09-30 20:57:56+00:00): Myślałem ze sprawdzisz każdy punkt i naniesiesz poprawki :) Gdyby nikt więcej się nie czepiał, to by przeszło.
maraf24 (2021-09-30 21:00:36+00:00): I na przyszłość: lepiej podzielić jest taki zestaw na mniejsze geograficznie.
adiatmad (2021-10-04 09:22:54+00:00): Hello Billadelphia. I bet you are doing great.
Are you trying to map the field rice?
If yes, the tag building=yes may not fit with your interest on this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111886528
mariotomo (2021-12-25 21:56:05+00:00): hi. welcome to OSM. in case you make a new attempt at mapping, please ask for assistance, and read the wiki about the tags you're going to use. "name" isn't a "description", and "building=yes" is enough to make clear that the polygon is a building. hope to welcome you back some day.
boldtrn (2022-09-21 12:25:47+00:00): Ich bin etwas spät dran mit der Antwort, aber die conditional access Werte können so nicht so richtig ausgelesen werden. Das Problem ist, dass die Monate als 3 Buchstaben angegeben werden sollten und nicht als Zahl. Du findest z.B. im Wiki dieses Beispiel:

motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (2018 May 22-2018 Oct 7)

Hier siehst du 3 Buchstaben anstatt zahlen. Die 3 Buchstaben sollten den Englischen Monaten folgen. Mai = May, Oktober = Oct (von October). Vielleicht magst du das noch anpassen?
MxxCon (2021-09-29 23:41:45+00:00): Hello.
Could you please explain what are you editing here?
km2bp (2021-09-29 20:52:38+00:00): http://openpoimap.org/?map=various&zoom=17&lat=51.94103&lon=15.50427&layers=B00FFFFFFFFFFFFFTFFFFFF
Joe Dassin (2021-10-03 10:13:08+00:00): What about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664637889 ? Linking river _ways_ to Wikidata is nearly always bogus as noted at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111952416
Ser9ei (2021-09-30 11:08:45+00:00): noname для троп не требуется; bicycle=yes и
foot=yes - значения по умолчанию и не требуют простановки тегов. Следует проставлять только запреты доступа. Что не запрещено - разрешено.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111887299
MxxCon (2021-09-29 23:24:00+00:00): Hello.
Is it appropriate to map such a feature on OSM?
You could probably map some plaque if there are any on that building? But otherwise perhaps it's more suitable for wikidata or https://openhistoricalmap.org?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111887794
muralito (2023-02-16 19:24:27+00:00): Hola. Por favor cuando muevas elementos en Uruguay, no tomes como base el Bing o Maxar o cosas de esas que tiene una desviación importante, de varios metros, y en general estan mal ortorectificadas. Las fotos que libero el gobierno como IDE.uy 2019 son mas precisas.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-07 12:50:27+00:00): Zastanawiam się czy są podstawy do tej zmiany.

Władze Krakowa miały plany zrobienia szybkiego tramwaju, ale na razie sprawa jest głównie marketingowa.

Patrzyłem na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dlight_rail i wygląda na to że kryteria nie są spełnione.

Np. zobacz 

> Strong criteria for light rail against tram:
>    Trams are driving on sight, while light rail has signals.
>    Light rails are driving faster than trams because of own right of way and more complex signaling and protection.

a w Krakowie nawet w tunelu na północ od Ronda Mogilskiego tramwaj się wlecze bo nie zamontowali planowanej sygnalizacji umożliwiającej szybką jazdę z pełną prędkością

> Tory tramwajowe prowadzą przez pierwszy w Polsce tunel tramwajowy, w którym maszyny mają rozwijać maksymalną bezpieczną prędkość 60 km/h (obecnie obowiązuje ograniczenie do 30 i 40 km/h).

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krakowski_Szybki_Tramwaj
krzechix (2021-10-21 16:13:26+00:00): Odcinki które zaznaczyłem są oficjalnie Szybkim Tramwajem. Patrzyłem na link i znaczna część punktów pasuje do oznaczenia tego jako Light Rail. Na tych odcinkach pojazdy poruszają się po wydzielonych torach, na skrzyżowaniach jednopoziomowych mają priorytet od strony sygnalizacji. Fakt, w tunelu prędkość 60 nie jest rozwijana, ale jest tam inny argument w postaci własnej sygnalizacji (blokady liniowej)
friedrice428 (2021-11-04 17:33:10+00:00): Nie sądzę, że KST można przedstawić jako light_rail, wszyscy nazywają to tramwajem, poza tym składy nie osiągają wyższych prędkości. Faktem jest, że ma wydzielone torowisko, ale brakuje bardziej zaawansowanej sygnalizacji poza tunelem. Pod light_rail bardziej podchodzi już londyński tramwaj, który oprócz centrum Croydon jeździ po całkowicie odosobnionym torowisku.
user_8466505 (2021-09-30 01:29:19+00:00): Hello shortstayhawaii,
Welcome to OSM! Thanks for helping out with surveying Honolulu, it helps out a lot! If you would like to chat with the community on Discord, here's the link: https://discord.gg/openstreetmap
Kevo (2021-10-11 14:33:23+00:00): Dude, you need to be careful with your edits - you changed an address range to a secondary road.  You also mapped Chinguacousy Rd as separated, when it's not and broke the addresses ranges on two roads when you did that.  This isn't a playground, you need to be careful.  Please start off simple with your map edits and learn as you go, as your edits are constantly and consistently wrong/bad.  Please check out the LearnOSM guides: https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/

Also, for new roads (proposed/under construction) it's good practise to put the source so people know the accuracy (ex: GPS, Bing imagery, etc.)
SomeoneElse (2021-09-30 23:11:36+00:00): Hello Andrew,
Your changeset comment here is just "updated".  It'd be better if you could use comments that explain in more detail what you're actually edited.
Best Regards,
Andy
Glassman (2021-09-30 20:00:20+00:00): #TIP: square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111889604
petricore (2021-09-30 21:46:17+00:00): got it, thanks!
marczoutendijk (2021-09-30 09:12:24+00:00): Hi,
Using the tag: bicycle=not specified could better be replaced by not using that tag at all!
You have received quite a number of comments from the community which you have not replied to, could you start doing that?
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11210886
You seem to have a different opinion on the way bicycles are allowed on various highway types, please discuss this with the members of the Australian community, either here:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=24
or here:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
tonyf1 (2021-10-15 22:33:49+00:00): Reverted in part by 112561576, significant editing since HighRouleur's taggings so resolved conflicts by accepting current values.
maro21 (2021-09-30 20:03:27+00:00): Cześć, podane przez ciebie źródło jest tylko projektem, a nie obowiązującym prawem i nie może być użyte jako źródło. A propozycji było już dużo, też przeglądam czasem wrocławski BIP i ktoś chciał przywrócić plac 1 Maja w miejsce placu Jana Pawła II i oczywiście taka propozycja nie przeszła. Czytaj proszę w całości przytoczone linki. Źródłami nazw ulic mogą uchwalone uchwały lub tabliczki przy ulicy, a z podkładów Geoportal Nazwy Ulic lub SIP Wrocław. I najczęściej nazwa ulicy jest we wszystkich czterech tych miejscach, w tym przypadku nie ma jej w żadnym z nich.
Glassman (2021-09-30 20:01:32+00:00): #TIP: When changing from landuse=construction, just change the tag to the new landuse. In this case it would be residential.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111889708
maro21 (2021-09-30 20:03:36+00:00): Cześć, podane przez ciebie źródło jest tylko projektem, a nie obowiązującym prawem i nie może być użyte jako źródło. A propozycji było już dużo, też przeglądam czasem wrocławski BIP i ktoś chciał przywrócić plac 1 Maja w miejsce placu Jana Pawła II i oczywiście taka propozycja nie przeszła. Czytaj proszę w całości przytoczone linki. Źródłami nazw ulic mogą uchwalone uchwały lub tabliczki przy ulicy, a z podkładów Geoportal Nazwy Ulic lub SIP Wrocław. I najczęściej nazwa ulicy jest we wszystkich czterech tych miejscach, w tym przypadku nie ma jej w żadnym z nich.
Mordechai23 (2021-09-30 20:26:41+00:00): Tak, podałem projekty w źródłach. Tak, czytałem wyniki głosowania dla tej sesji i wszystkie interesujące nas uchwały przeszły jednogłośnie 16 września z efektywnością 14 dni ;) czyli jest już pierwsze z wymienionych przez ciebie źródeł. A na podkładach wms pojawi się jak  ktoś go odświerzy
MatthewSeale (2021-10-01 00:58:39+00:00): Hi, ref way 506056033 you have tagged a 66kV power line as highway=footway.  The 66kV line is part of a relation to the 66kV distribution route from Fishermans Bend Terminal Station to Albert Park substation, and has tags for cables, circuits, voltage and wires. and power poles marked as nodes.   The 66kV line and power poles are visible on Bing aerial imagery.  If you check OMS history of this power line this shows it was originally mapped based on AEMO and Citipower (distributor) information.  See also the large number of warnings this change has created.
adamh (2021-10-01 06:10:10+00:00): There are 30 modified ways in this changeset, mostly path->footway tag changes.
What does this have to do with the changeset comment of "updates to cycling permission to align with Victoria Road Regulations" ?
marczoutendijk (2021-10-01 09:22:46+00:00): I have issued a zero-hour block for this user.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5358
  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
HighRouleur (2021-10-01 09:51:18+00:00): Hi 
The change to the powerline was accidental, apologies for the inconvenience.
marczoutendijk (2021-10-01 10:00:28+00:00): Please see also the other comments to your changesets:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11210886

as well as the discussion on talk-au:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-September/014989.html
  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
HighRouleur (2021-10-01 10:18:59+00:00): Hi Marc,

I hadn’t realised that notification had been going to my junk mail hence why wasn’t aware of comments on the change sets. 

In response to the discussion on talk-au raised by Tonyf1, I note that in the State of Victoria, Australia it is illegal to ride a bike on a footpath unless it’s specifically signed. where as tonyf1 has said that there was no sign to indicate bikes weren’t permitted. This is not the case, as permission to ride a bike on path in Victoria is only permitted by exception. 

I am simply correcting an error in the data. 
I have changed commentary on changesets to indicate “ updates to cycling permissions to align with Victoria Road Regulations”
aharvey (2021-10-01 11:32:35+00:00): hi HighRouleur, on the talk-au thread about this, there is discussion going on so I invite you to join in. One point of discussion was some people can legally ride on the footpath (children) and marking bicycle=no as a default legal restriction makes it impossible to capture places where no body can cycle including children. There are more intricacies here, so given this is an active point of discussion and disagreements on how it should be tagged, it would be great if you could join these discussions so we can agree on how the tagging should be done for Melbourne footpaths before doing mass-tagging.
MatthewSeale (2021-10-01 11:52:47+00:00): Thank you HighRouleur. The 66kV power line tagging has been reverted.
HighRouleur (2021-10-01 12:27:57+00:00): Thanks aharvey

I’m new to OSM, so still getting my head around how all the forum chat works. I can see and read all the discussions that are occurring but haven’t yet figured out how to post. Any help?
tonyf1 (2021-10-01 12:28:23+00:00): Hi HighRouleur. Most if not all of your foot/cycle changes are not in "road related areas" (See rules 11-13 of the Road Rules) and not covered by the Victorian no riding on footpaths rule. It is possible that I am wrong, I am not a lawyer, but there is sufficient doubt about this to ask you to stop and engage seriously with the mapping community. Please stop retagging and resolve your outstanding disputes.