piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Carto'Cité (2022-12-09 13:57:31+00:00): Salut Nzau,
Sur ces routes :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249976274
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903726527
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903726528
Certains contributeurs décrivent des bandes cyclables alors qu'il s'agit à ma connaissance de bande multiservices qui se décrivent en shoulder:*=yes. C'est une question de signalétique et de largeur et longueur des traits. Et oui en pratique ça sert de bande cyclable. Sur taginfo on trouve des cycleway:*=shoulder mais ce n'est pas documenté (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/cycleway%3Aleft=shoulder). J'ai corrigé dans ce sens mais n’hésite pas à me dire si tu as des remarques.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Nzau (2022-12-09 19:54:01+00:00): Salut Charles,
Je vois effectivement les routes dont tu parles et je ne savais pas vraiment comment les décrire.
Merci pour tes rectifications ! 
Bonnes soirée.
Carto'Cité (2022-12-11 20:26:10+00:00): Saut Nzau,
J'ai corrigé pas mal de trucs mais sinon tu as fait un paquet de très bonnes contributions et je n'ai pas fini de tout passer en revue. 
Merci encore pour toutes tes contributions.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
canfe (2024-07-21 15:47:49+00:00): La strada Regione Giairasse non ha il nome "Regione xyz". Sul cartello c'è scritto che QUELLA è la Regione xyz ma la strada non ha quel nome, anzi non ha nome e andrebbe messo noname=yes.
qui una query per trovare un po' di errori simili.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Oz9
Thomas8122 (2022-10-22 10:46:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3402972
Thomas8122 (2022-10-22 10:46:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3371357
eggie (2022-10-22 10:50:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
nikospag (2022-10-22 13:01:06+00:00): Please stop vandalizing the map.
nikospag (2022-10-22 13:02:28+00:00): @DWG We have a new vandalizer
marczoutendijk (2022-10-22 13:49:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6471
SHARCRASH (2022-10-22 11:11:47+00:00): Hi! 
All the N81 is considered to be part of the E411 https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Route_europ%C3%A9enne_411 What is the source of your verification? Most importantly for the bicycle access.
bk1_168 (2022-10-22 11:21:14+00:00): I have cycled it myself. It is not forbidden for bicycle. It is a normal road, mostly 4 lanes, but roundabouts etc.
It is very important to not have "bicycle forbidden" in OSM when it is actually allowed, because many bicycle routing tools rely on accurate data from OSM. So I corrected it.
SHARCRASH (2022-10-22 12:07:15+00:00): I just found some ways which allow cyclists to enter the N81, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106032634 so yeah indeed it is allowed to bicycles. I just want OSM data correct/accurate and myself i'm a cyclist. 

As far as i can remember, this highway network has a specific history. It think it really used to be a motorway (autoroute in French) before the roundabouts were built. It's still awkward though to find inaccurate data in OSM for such a long time! 

Thanks!
bk1_168 (2022-10-22 12:22:23+00:00): In Belgium there is a rather large network of national roads (N xxx) and they are usually allowed for bicycles, with very few exceptions, even if they have 4 lanes and exits instead of intersections/roundabouts. Historically these were in some relations the only road and they expaneded them to 4 lanes and the like, but never made them an "Autobahn" or motorway.  Example: N4.  Later they built a motorway parallel (A4), so there are 2 different roads parallel, each having 4 lanes.
38446 (2022-12-02 16:46:57+00:00): Hey, thank you for contributing local knowledge and especially the fact that there is a public bath in the pond in Öjeparken. However, the amenity=public_bath tag should not be used instead of the natural=water tag, but in addition to it. (In this case, with the small area, a node would be enough). I am going to change it.
eggie (2022-10-22 10:55:24+00:00): Hi It's also possible to tag a path with
smootheness=impassable
But in case there is no path at all??
... map what's on the ground. 

Greetz,
eggie
JoachimBo (2022-10-23 08:29:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for your remark! In this case we did a rather thorough search of the path, and could not find it. The impassable tag, I will certainly use in future. Greetz, Boris
Strubbl (2022-10-22 17:23:01+00:00): Hi Simon, es ist hier schon ein Wimmer eingezeichnet, allerdings an leicht anderer Position: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1377027047
Sollte einer von beiden entfernt werden?
Strubbl (2022-10-22 17:25:03+00:00): Ich sehe gerade ein Foto von dem: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1103662036807838&focus=photo&lat=48.184299258759&lng=11.578422476977&z=17

Sind die beiden Wimmer unabhängig voneinander?
Schdoi (2022-10-22 17:31:23+00:00): Ich denke, einer reicht. Komischerweise hat's den bestehenden in meiner Maps.me-App nicht angezeigt.
Strubbl (2022-10-22 17:37:07+00:00): Ok, danke. Ich habe einen entfernt und den bestehenden etwas mittiger geschoben mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127932294

Vielleicht wurde der nicht angezeigt, weil der Schreibwarenladen zu dicht da dran war.
Anon-4 (2022-10-22 10:47:11+00:00): Aún queda por hacer algunas modificaciones que se incorporarán en la segunda parte de este conjunto de cambios.
eggie (2022-10-22 11:42:49+00:00): Hoi.. Je vraagt feedback.. Ziet er netjes uit.
Groet
eggie
pepijn7 (2022-10-22 11:51:02+00:00): Oke dankje, ik wist niet zeker of ik het voetpad helemaal door naar de grote weg moest trekken.
eggie (2022-10-22 11:57:12+00:00): Yes dat is schipperen. Het zal ook moeten routeren.

In dit stuk Hoogstraat heb ik sidewalk=both opgenomen.
Op de standaard kaart zie je dat overigens niet.
Parallel trottoirs worden meestal opgenomen in de hoofdrijbaan als tag... sidewalk=right/ left /both of zelfs no

Sommige mappers mappen ook trottoirs, maar als je dat niet goed doet raakt de routering in de war. Je krijgt omwegen. 

Het is zo oke.
abakus_uploader (2022-10-22 22:31:56+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SHARCRASH (2022-10-22 11:39:27+00:00): + stores/shops detailed/corrected
eggie (2022-10-22 11:48:20+00:00): Ziet er goed uit.. Alleen de naam 1-3RI rendert dubbel.
Je zou evt. één losse laag leisure=park over het geheel kunnen trekken Dat kan gewoon over de Hoogstraat met de bushaltes heen.  Dan heb je gewoon één naamsduiding. 
groet
eggie
SomeoneElse (2022-10-22 12:43:28+00:00): Hello,
Is there a list anywhere of what values you're changing things from and what values you're changing things to?
Obviously in this particular example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357329257/history isn't going to affect any downstream consumers, but I suspect that in many cases changes might.
Unfortunately I haven't yet added "key value" granularity to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/historic#projects for https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/projects/someoneelse_style , so I can't suggest an "easy list" of what I do now, except to point at https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua , but if there's a way to see what is changed to what, I'd definitely look at it.
To be clear, I think that tidying up values such as this one is definitely beneficial - literally no-one is going to understand "historic=202 S.Fulton St." (the previous value).
Best Regards,
Andy
b-unicycling (2022-10-22 13:21:21+00:00): I'm going through the pages of https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/historic#values, sorted by value, mostly translating what's in the value and decide what historic key applies or - starting on the last page - changing the dates in the historic value to start_value. There were fixmes on most of them, but they don't seem to lead to any changes.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-22 14:43:46+00:00): A problem is that https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/historic#values is updated in real time and doesn't show previous values, so I don't know what you've changed things _from_.  I therefore can't go through my code and see what I need to change.
b-unicycling (2022-10-22 14:55:02+00:00): It's only updated once a day, I think.
Isn't there a way in JOSM to show the history of a feature?
SomeoneElse (2022-10-22 15:01:32+00:00): At https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/b-unicycling/history there are > 33,000 edits.  I hope that you weren't suggesting that I go through each of those, find edits where a tag you changed or removed was "historic", and analyse what you values you removed or what you changed things from an to?  That sounds like a lot of work.
It'd be much easier if you described what you were doing, rather than just used changeset comments like "retagged historic site", as here.
b-unicycling (2022-10-22 16:58:41+00:00): I removed very few historic tags. Very few. I mostly changed historic=PROPER_NAME_IN_CHINESE to something more fitting like historic=house or historic=temple and put whatever was the value for historic into either name= or description=.
Anil Basnet (2022-10-26 05:15:48+00:00): Wrong mapping overlapping buildings.
SHARCRASH (2022-10-22 11:19:44+00:00): + new elements
adiatmad (2022-10-26 05:57:08+00:00): Hello! Your edit looks great. But you have some crossing issues, for example (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106025107), (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106025108) and (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106025106). 

Also, you may want to go through this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments). Happy mapping, Devraj Devkota!
mueschel (2022-10-23 09:02:33+00:00): Hi,
the key 'moped_p' has been replaced by the international term 'speed_pedelec'. I just changed a couple of your tags to the new one.

Cheers,
Jan
Eebie (2022-10-23 18:49:38+00:00): Hi,
I created those tags with the Roadsign plugin in JOSM. It seems that 4 Belgian roadsigns still have the old tags. I sent a request to user Bk to correct this.
Regards,
Erik
ianlopez1115 (2022-10-22 13:09:29+00:00): offset used is -8.36; -4.63
gscholz (2022-10-23 06:40:34+00:00): Hi EXC4L3,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-3.76828&lat=37.19929&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127918251

This kidn of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kid Regards
Guido
EXC4L3 (2022-10-23 15:20:12+00:00): Hi!
I'm a new and I dont know how to fixed... :c
gscholz (2022-10-23 06:41:23+00:00): Hi alex_lofi,
this changeset has created or at least left behind errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-3.76828&lat=37.19929&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127918266

This kidn of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kid Regards
Guido
alex_lofi (2022-10-23 07:49:52+00:00): Hi, thanks for the heads up; it should be fixed by now (changeset 127945623).
Best regards.
PT-53 (2023-02-24 07:31:26+00:00): Hallo Chris,
dieser Weg
-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106028493/history
hat ein Merkmal
no=access
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
ChrisFromRV (2023-02-24 08:04:07+00:00): Hi. Ja, kann ich machen. Muss in ca. 2 Wochen eh mal wieder nach Wangen. MFG
PT-53 (2023-02-24 08:07:14+00:00): no=access
ist doch kein gültiges Merkmal.
Wenn, dann müßte es wohl eher
access=no
heißen. Aber ein Fußweg, den niemand benutzen darf, macht ja wohl auch keinen Sinn.
PT-53 (2023-02-24 08:10:05+00:00): Ein Fußweg, den niemand benutzen darf?`:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052450451/history
ChrisFromRV (2023-02-24 08:30:43+00:00): Der Fußweg ist zwar fertiggestellt, führt aber zu einem Fußweg der noch nicht für die Öffentlichkeit freigegeben  ist. Daher ist er gesperrt.
PT-53 (2023-03-17 06:05:42+00:00): Ich wiederhole nochmal:
no=access
ist doch kein gültiges Merkmal.
Wenn, dann müßte es wohl eher
access=no
heißen
Carto'Cité (2022-12-08 17:45:00+00:00): La bande cyclable sur cette portion était du mauvais côté : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106028623
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Nzau (2022-12-08 20:34:22+00:00): J'avoue que je doute parfois encore entre ma droit et ma gauche désolé 😂
eggie (2022-10-22 12:02:04+00:00): Een lastige....  Er ligt daar niemand toch?  Ik dacht dat het een Calvarieberg was daar.
Het is wel ook een herinneringsplaats aan de gestorvenen. 
Had al zitten zoeken bij calvarie..
Meestal maakt ik een zoekslag in google ....."de tag".....  wiki osm 

Wellicht bij place_of_worship?
eggie (2022-10-22 12:12:21+00:00): Of... 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_cross

Er staat natuurlijk ook een kruis.
Die namen staan aan weerszijde.

Je kunt zoiets ook op het forum vragen.
Probeer het gewoon. We hebben net een vernieuwd forum.
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Inlog identiek aan OSM account.
pepijn7 (2022-10-22 12:18:38+00:00): Oke, ik zal straks even een kijkje nemen op het forum, dankjewel.
eggie (2022-10-22 12:23:11+00:00): Je kunt het zo mooi maken als je wilt. Er moet ook ergens een leisure=picnic_table staan. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table
Dino Michelini (2023-01-29 13:16:31+00:00): Hi, your changes in this changeset affected route #12293343. Now stage 6 is no longer ordered and is interrupted. I made the correction; please be more careful when you map. OK?
nounours77 (2023-01-29 16:14:41+00:00): Hi Dino, Sorry for creating a mess, and thank you for cleaning up!
Nounours
MxxCon (2022-10-22 16:23:52+00:00): Hello.
What are you trying to tag here with non-standard url= tag to youtube videos?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127919180
moje_konto (2022-10-22 19:58:32+00:00): How is it new office?

You just removed it in this edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127881563 - stating it's "just online service".

Then re-added exactly same office with less informations - removed tags: description, start_date, wheelchair, email, level and in addr:street - replaced full street name by short.

Also moved the node from building 53a - to building 53. So most likely it's now on wrong building.
abakus_uploader (2022-10-22 22:31:55+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Konkon153 (2022-10-22 12:29:59+00:00): [ und damit alle 582 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Dümmer vollständig angepasst ]
maraf24 (2022-10-25 06:42:12+00:00): Park Edyty Stein ma określony zasięg i nie obejmuje kościoła.
Przywrócisz poprzedni obszar?
Mordechai23 (2022-10-27 14:12:42+00:00): dopiero teraz przeczytałem, chyba już to zrobiłeś?
nikospag (2022-10-22 15:38:46+00:00): @DWG I am confident that is user is the same with blocked "users" gaspertv02 and G626
abakus_uploader (2022-10-22 22:31:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2022-10-22 15:03:29+00:00): Ik heb even wat aangepast ter Leering ende Vermaeck.
layer=-1 verwijderd. Het zit niet onder de grond.
tunnel=yes aangepast naar building_passage en de eindnodes verbonden met de gebouwomtrek. 


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127926135
Groet
eggie
pepijn7 (2022-10-22 15:38:00+00:00): Ah Eggie, dank u. Ik was al aan het zoeken of er een betere tag voor was. Genoteerd voor de toekomst!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-26 11:26:26+00:00): Dzięki za zmapowanie, przydało się na mapie podczas wycieczki z siostrą na Kudłoń.

Przy okazji: wszystkiego najlepszego na święta i nowy rok, miłego mapowania!
pesec (2022-10-24 06:02:17+00:00): Приветствую.
Прежде чем ломать, ознакомься с актуальными спутниковыми данными, а лучше съезди сам посмотри расположение на местности. Я так и сделал, прежде чем вносить.
Stalker61 (2022-10-24 08:50:08+00:00): Опа! А здрасьте где? Раз уж в таком тоне поехали, то для начала свои кривые ручки поправьте и сами научитесь с подложками работать. Одни косяки за вами выгребаю постоянно.
pesec (2022-10-24 09:13:49+00:00): Вообще-то с вами поздоровались.
Подложки общедоступны и однозначно понимаемы.
Без предметного указания смысла в споре о кривизне не вижу.
В данном пакете правок вами использованы не актуальные данные, о чем и указал.

p.s.: При объеме вносимых мной данных вам грех жаловаться, что приходится что-то поправлять. Чем я также достаточно много занимаюсь. В чистом поле ошибок не бывает.
vasony-qa (2022-11-17 14:09:33+00:00): Hi! In this changeset you have created (copy-pasted) several buildings in Békéscsaba, Hungary. These buildings' geometry are not matching to the referenced Maxar Imagery.
What is your reason for that?
fedoroff net (2022-11-18 13:57:42+00:00): Hi, friend. You can cancel the package if something does not suit you. Do you think a map without buildings is better?
efemm (2022-11-19 18:18:26+00:00): Buildings are useful, but why don't you create them with more exact geometry? Maxer imagery has more detail. You use the same geomerty on all the buildings, it is a mistake. Why do you create all the buildings with 17 points? 4 is enough, and could be extended easily, but buildings with 17 points are easier to delete and create again. The Entrance point is also a false information for the buildings you created.
fedoroff net (2022-11-19 20:35:34+00:00): This is more for experimental testing, you can delete erroneous edits.
DaveF (2022-10-23 11:26:36+00:00): Why have you split a public footpath leaving an undesignated section:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/841354437

What OSMI rule flagged it as a problem?
ratrun (2022-10-23 13:22:05+00:00): Thanks for detecting my fault. OSMI complained about unconnected ways. I improved the modification in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127957244, please check now.
Dodko (2022-10-23 08:26:34+00:00): Adresa v contact:facebook je nesprávna.
Rumburak7 (2022-10-28 14:51:20+00:00): Uz opravené, diky
Frans S (2022-10-30 10:27:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
A few points. Do not map clustered buildings as 1 building. Please square each rectangular buildings with the Q key.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127922761
martinst (2022-10-22 17:17:39+00:00): Bei direction=* werden (wie sonst auch immer) englische Ausdrücke verwendet.
whb (2023-11-27 13:58:29+00:00): Hello,

the lake looks more like a cloud shadow to me on the Bing aerial photos. Only forest can be seen on "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta".

Kind regards
whb
Unbeatable101 (2023-11-27 14:01:46+00:00): 💀 Yeah you are right
keithonearth (2022-10-26 16:09:09+00:00): Thank you for noticing and fixing this so quickly! Unfortunately this user is still active, their last edit was a few hours ago.
paulbrunner (2022-11-25 11:30:52+00:00): Hi fedoroff net, 
thanks for mapping. 

These buildings look like the same building copypasted multiple times. That's unfortunately not an accurate representation of what we see in the aerial imagery. It's also more work to correct the map now compared to starting from an empty map.

Since you are using JOSM, do you know the Building Tool plugin? I find it very useful to add many buildings, also with more complex shapes. You can find some info on how to use it here: https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-more-plugins/

Let me know if you need any help, I'm always happy to share what I have found out so far.

All the best,
Paul
fedoroff net (2022-11-25 11:44:41+00:00): Hello 

These are experimental buildings, I just forgot to delete them. Much better than a city without buildings, isn't it?

All the best
paulbrunner (2022-11-27 16:09:53+00:00): Absolutely, it can give more detailed info than having only the landuse.
fedoroff net (2022-11-27 18:33:27+00:00): These are experimental tasks, I'm making variants for 3D.  I'll fix it soon.
fititnt (2023-03-06 18:56:11+00:00): Olá googlenaut!

Percebo que algumas de suas contribuições, por exemplo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106084586, colide com prédio anterior https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543804146. Como seu "source =aerial imagery" é genérico, não tenho como confirmar o que fazer (mas assumo que a sua seja mais nova).

Poderia por favor dar uma olhada? Algumas outras de mapatonas eu até estou revendo (comparo com imagens fontes para ver qual seria mais recente) mas prefiro não mexer na sua.

Obrigado!
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-22 15:21:31+00:00): Jei jau „collapsed“ tai viskas gerai :-)
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 14:46:07+00:00): your mapping is good 
please keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127923979
MxxCon (2022-10-22 16:26:24+00:00): Hello.
I think the previous outline was more accurate, at least at the rear of the building since it more closely followed the building's footprint rather than roof line, which tend to be smaller than the footprint.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127923998
Michael Alvarez (2022-10-22 23:28:37+00:00): The rear was hard for me to tell but the link you provided showed it was different than I had it initially. So, I tried to replicate it but I’m unsure which works fine since it has a bunch of balconies and grassy area around it’s base.