piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
seichter (2022-07-15 20:48:55+00:00): The name:en-Tag is not a real name but only the address.
All info is in the address:*-tags.
I have only added addr:suburb=Norzin.
name-tags should not be misused to have the address appear on the standard map.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
Msiipola (2022-07-23 10:46:13+00:00): Hej!
Varför är namnet på cykelvägen raderad: GC-54 Kö?

Uppgiften kommer från NVDB, och jag antar det är Köpings kommun som har infört det.
Msiipola (2022-07-23 10:48:57+00:00): Dvs. cykelväg norrut från Köping mot Kolsva
riiga (2022-07-23 10:58:43+00:00): Det finns mycket skit i NVDB. Jag har varit på plats och kan garantera att det inte finns några skyltar som visar att det skulle vara namnet på GC-vägen. Därför har jag tagit bort det. Troligen borde alla namn i samma stil tas bort.
Msiipola (2022-07-23 11:11:11+00:00): Är du säker på att Köpings kommun inte har en namn-db för internt bruk på alla cykelvägar?

Samma typ av namn finns på alla cykelvägar i Västerås kommun.

I båda dessa kommuner borde man kolla med kommunkontoret om  cykelvägnamnen är aktuella/officiella och används för något ändamål.

Jag har inget emot att ta bort felaktig data, men vi kan väl inte radera alla cykelvägnamn i Köpings och Västerås kommun för att vi inte hittar någon skyltning på dessa. Eller?
riiga (2022-07-23 13:04:00+00:00): Vad de har internt spelar ingen roll för OSM. Här gäller "map what's on the ground", verkligheten trumfar NVDB. Även om någon mot förmodan i OSM skulle ha nytta av kommunens interna numrering av GC-vägar så är namn fel fält, det borde snarare ligga i "ref:NVDB" eller något liknande.

Jag förordrar dock att det raderas helt, men det är inget jag aktivt kommer att göra.
Msiipola (2022-07-23 13:22:28+00:00): Ok, jag kan nog hålla med dig.

Jag har skickat en fråga till Köpings kommun om detta. Får se om det svarar. Om svaret indikerar att namnen bara är interna, så borde man rensa dessa. Frågan är om man törs göra en mass-editering av alla? Dvs. välja alla GC-vägar med namn "GC*" och radera namnen? Kanske lite farligt?
riiga (2022-07-23 13:29:58+00:00): Inte särskilt farligt om man använder JOSM och vet vad man sysslar med. Vi kan ju avvakta svar från kommunen iaf.
willkmis (2022-07-17 07:04:44+00:00): Hi, what is your source for this addition?
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-18 17:15:00+00:00): I frequent the location. I live in Los Angeles. Also their website verifies this information.
willkmis (2022-07-19 18:04:12+00:00): Ok great, thanks for replying. One nice thing you can do is indicate your source  in the changeset. You can do this by adding the "Sources" field underneath the change comment. If you've personally been there, you can say "survey", and also add "website" if you verified the info on the business's website. This isn't mandatory, but it can be helpful for other mappers looking at your changes.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
sejohnson (2022-07-28 12:21:48+00:00): On this and other tasks, you have mapped farm fields as buildings. Please re-tag these as farmland. Thank you.
Frans S (2022-08-19 15:00:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
You tagged pieces of farmland as buildings. 
I reverted these mappings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123641562
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
willkmis (2022-07-17 07:02:40+00:00): Hi, what is your source for this house name? If this is the name of the owner of the house, it is not appropriate information for OSM.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-17 09:27:42+00:00): This is a local tourist destination. Featured in multiple publications and videos. What do you need me to provide. Thanks
SomeoneElse (2022-07-17 10:59:54+00:00): Some proof, such as a photo of the actual house name, would be good.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-18 16:41:43+00:00): Thank you so much for the advice. I changed it to tourist attraction since I've learned that's a kind of designation. Will the photo be from me or from a publication and what field do i use to put that in?
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-18 16:49:05+00:00): Also, what designation do movie homes get? Like the Encino man home in 7500 Sedgwick Ct. West Hills? would this be considered proof? https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=billie+eilish+house+highland+park&docid=607989755426730089&mid=559A5FDFF49CB65EC798559A5FDFF49CB65EC798&view=detail&FORM=VIRE
SomeoneElse (2022-07-18 17:30:09+00:00): Re "Also, what designation do movie homes get?" generally speaking, they don't.

If a house appeared in a movie once but there's nothing on the ground to indicate that, then it shouldn't be mapped in OSM.

Likewise "tourism=attraction" is only valid if the place genuinely is a tourist attraction - i.e. people visit it AND are invited in.  If that's not the case here (and I suspect that it isn't) then it shouldn't get the "tourism=attraction" tag in OSM.  Similarly it shouldn't get the name "Eilish House" unless that really is the name of the property (and again, I suspect that this is not the case here).

The video you have linked to seems to be almost entirely content-free.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-18 17:47:18+00:00): what do you mean content free.. thanks still learning the ropes.

Like direct address. Gotcha so the Hollywood sign for example would not be tagged a tourist attraction?
SomeoneElse (2022-07-23 16:36:47+00:00): By "content free" I just meant that it didn't confirm the name used here, and that it was 11 minutes of my life that I won't get back. :)
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-23 17:53:36+00:00): oh. wow. ok. thanks for the info, but could use less sarcasm. still learning the ropes. attitude is not appreciated.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:30:38+00:00): There are many other tourist attraction homes tagged on this map. Please advise how I can stay consistent with this kind of tag to match all the others.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:28:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
Frans S (2022-08-04 08:59:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123643141
Frans S (2022-08-04 08:59:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123643141
Colbertson (2022-07-15 09:28:22+00:00): dunalka*
Frans S (2022-07-16 09:26:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).H: Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123643971
Alfie66 (2023-07-15 12:47:06+00:00): Extremely overrated. Seeings of large pelagics are actually extremely rare and critters not more abundant than at other dive sites in the Surin and Similan Islands.
ig4map (2023-07-15 14:24:04+00:00): @Alfie66 almost any impressions related to beauty is subjective. But my overall description for landscape, fishes and so on for Richelieu Rock still the same.  If you prefer large pelagics creatures I can advise you https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9516447813 dive site.
Alfie66 (2023-07-16 07:41:28+00:00): @ig4map of course, it’s subjective. At least backed by my experience of 40+ years of diving in 21 countries. The official webpage https://www.thainationalparks.com/mu-ko-surin-national-park states seeings of whale sharks and manta rays ‘rare’. THX for the hint about the Maldives – I had 267 dives under the belt there… If you spotted a Sunfish there, you were extremely lucky. Axel Horn (running the dive center at Gan) told me that it took him 14,000+ dives to spot his first one. ;-)
ig4map (2023-07-16 09:20:24+00:00): @Alfie66 Cool, man! Could you please map dive spots from your experience/GPS traces on OpenStreetMap it will be useful for many divers as not so many dive spots marked on it. I performed world wide OSM analysis last summer and data coverage only good in Egypt
Alfie66 (2023-07-16 10:10:07+00:00): @ig4map oh dear! No GPS data, I could only guesstimate them. No promises…
Dodko (2022-07-17 11:13:15+00:00): Bod treba umiestniť nad budovu a budova má svoju adresu vtedy sa nevypĺňa duplicitne aj do bodu.

Telefónne číslo sa vypĺňa v medzinárodnom tvare +421

Môžete používať aktuálnejšie mapy Offline Organic Maps Hike&Bike tie sú aktualizované každý mesiac.
Frans S (2022-07-16 09:54:49+00:00): Hello.
I reviewed this changeset as well. 
Please square all rectangular buildings when you have selected. 51 out of 81 buildings you mapped are not squared.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123645071
maraf24 (2022-07-21 09:23:55+00:00): Mapowanie wg nieaktualnego orto.
philippec (2022-07-15 11:13:17+00:00): Duffel Zijpstraat AED
Komt er nog een mapillary ?
emersonveenstra (2022-07-15 10:44:45+00:00): Hi,

Did you mean to remove `service=parking_aisle` from all of those roads? They look like parking aisles to me
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123645566
DougPeterson (2022-07-18 20:30:17+00:00): Yes, as a generality. A service road that provides access to a parking lot or provides access for thru traffic is not a parking aisle. It is possible that a portion of what was changed could have been a parking aisle if broken off.
DougPeterson (2022-07-18 20:32:58+00:00): Maybe a better way of saying is that I think people err on the side of calling something a parking aisle just because there is parking next to it. I err on the side of calling it just service road when I can take it to get someplace else.
Allison P (2022-07-20 22:45:44+00:00): That is not a common standard. I would advise restoring the tag.
DougPeterson (2022-07-27 01:18:42+00:00): Certainly how you interpret these could be different. From the wiki:
It is generally not used for through traffic. 

Not every roadway within a parking lot is a parking aisle. Examples are...
    Road connects a parking lot or parking garage to a through street and serves as the entrance or exit of the lot or garage – use highway=service without service=* instead.
    Forms the "trunk" or perimeter of the parking lot, connecting multiple parking aisles – use highway=service without service=* instead. There may be parking spaces on either side, but the roadway's primary purpose is to get drivers to another part of the parking lot.
    Roadway does not have any parking bays itself.
    Primarily provides space for picking up and dropping off passengers – use highway=service service=driveway instead.
AndyB_66 (2022-07-15 10:33:54+00:00): Nie psuj edycji innych, bazując na swoim widzimisię.
eggie (2022-07-15 11:10:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-15 11:13:37+00:00): Edwin  Nieuwe import van woningen kun je hier versneld aanvragen op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Inlog identiek aan OSM account met eerst wat wachttijd wegens accountcheck.
Gr eggie
Frans S (2022-07-16 09:57:25+00:00): Hello again.
I reviewed this tas as well.
Apart from the squaring of buildings , Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123645843
maraf24 (2022-07-21 09:22:05+00:00): Budynki stoją.
Frans S (2022-08-01 09:25:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Be sure that an object is a building. Here you mapped a vague object, without shadows,  and far oversized. Please improve your mapping skills



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123646098
maraf24 (2022-07-21 09:19:10+00:00): Mapowanie z niekatualnego orto.
porfiriopaiz (2022-07-17 05:45:58+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contributions.

But, could you please be a bit more expressive with the information you provide on the messages that you add on your changeset and provide a more detailed and meaningful description of what you are doing with the edits you are making?

Regards,
Porfirio
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-22 17:31:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9889555101/history has building:name = 은마아파트 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Is building:name for building name? In such case it would be much better to put it into name tag. If this object merges builing and POI inside such as museum or shop, then having separate objects for point of interest and building would be better idea, museum may have own area or node (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element ).

If it is an inscription then it should use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inscription

If that is not a building name - what you wanted express by this tagging?
Kovoschiz (2022-07-15 12:14:28+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels in `name=`. That's for proper names only. Use `description:en=`.
AndyB_66 (2022-07-15 11:15:48+00:00): PRZESTAŃ PSUĆ MAPĘ !!!!!
eggie (2022-07-15 12:47:10+00:00): Dag Edwin.. Geen wegen gaan vastmaken aan vlakken svp.
Ik heb het infiltratiegebied losgemaakt.
Gebouwen worden niet zelf integetekend in OSM We importeren periodiek. Ik heb je al een link gestuurd hoe dat te doen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-15 12:49:13+00:00): Het adres heb ik weer verwijderd van de gebouw omtrek. 
Als voorbeeld zal ik een import aanvragen.
eggie (2022-07-15 12:52:50+00:00): Importverzoek loopt https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=867247#p867247
eggie (2022-07-15 13:39:45+00:00): Nieuwe woningen zijn geïmporteerd voor zover ze al in de BAG staan. Nog niet gebouwde woning als planned: building aangepast door BAGimporteur.
Even in de gaten houden wanneer die in de BAG verschijnt.
Gr eggie
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-06-29 23:09:09+00:00): These should not be connected so no turn restrictions would be needed
aTarom (2022-07-15 15:33:52+00:00): Hola Jesus David MF,
te va bien si elimino estas etiquetas
Cebaderos=cerdos:
Tags=-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078799541/history
O se quería indicar algo de la vía y se ha quedado a medias?
Saludos y gracias por editar.
@JDMF (2022-07-16 11:48:32+00:00): Ya lo he eliminado. Gracias
os-emmer (2023-12-15 00:28:57+00:00): Hi GrootLetabaRiver,
I think you made a typo here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066007725
It schould probably be ford=yes, right?
LemonEarlMapper (2023-12-18 15:20:36+00:00): Hello os-emmer, GrootLebataRiver is no longer on the team so I will be handling this on their behalf. GrootLetabaRiver was the last editor to work on these ways but did not add the ford tag to this way. I do agree that this is a typo and can be fixed, if you are available please feel free to make this update.  It looks like the editor JLOSM (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JLOSM) was the editor to add this tag on this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121833901#map=12/6.5084/-75.7468). Have a nice day and happy mapping!
os-emmer (2023-12-18 15:30:49+00:00): Thanks for your answer. It seems like someone already fixed it.
eggie (2022-07-15 17:15:54+00:00): Beste Simon  Deze changeset loopt van Berlijn tot A'dam...   Beperk je svp tot een gebied zo groot als een straat.
MVG
eggie
Vinber-Pro (2022-07-21 16:39:31+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez demandé un retour, je me permets donc :)
- Coté positionnement : ne pas oublier qu'un commerce est rarement dehors mais bien dans un batiment, donc de préférence, positionner le point d'intérêt dans le batiment
- ville et code postal ne sont pas utiles
- pour le téléphone on préférera le format +33 6 70 07 69 69
- les commentaires sont toujours les mêmes (ajout de l'information) ce qui ne permet pas de savoir ce que vous avez fait,

Et pour conclure, merci pour ces ajouts ...

Vincent
PaoloLombardi (2022-07-16 20:48:45+00:00): Grazie mille mi hai tolto una cosa da fare.
Eviterei solo di "nominare" il percorso con riferimento ad un'azione ("avvicinamento") perché è cosa scontata che serve a raggiungere la falesia. Saluti
giobonello (2022-07-18 08:29:16+00:00): Ciao Paolo, ho modificato il nome togliendo "avvicinamento". Vedi tu se può andare bene. Ciao, buona giornata
PaoloLombardi (2022-07-18 12:06:27+00:00): Buondì.
Il tag "name" serve solo a specificare "nomi propri" e non azioni e/o direzioni.
Altrimenti per logica se indichi una direzione da "A" verso "B" devi poi indicare anche il verso contrario. 
Quindi come già detto, trattandosi poi qui di una sola località come destinazione, è il "path" stesso ad avere una sua direzione senza dover specificare nulla nel tag "name". Ma che ho aggiunto nel tag "Note" anche se non è necessario farlo.
Un saluto.
giobonello (2022-07-18 15:34:57+00:00): Chiaro, perfetto. Grazie per la spiegazione. Ciao, buona serata
4004 (2022-07-18 01:28:26+00:00): технически я бы поспорил, можно ли отнести обычные баки к recycling..
Rico557 (2022-07-21 11:05:25+00:00): мы же уже это обсуждали, что весь мусор везётся на мусороперерабатывающий завод.