piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_4493657 (2018-01-09 17:15:20+00:00): Widzę po komentarzach, że nie jest z tobą najlepiej http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4457927
Wolfgang B (2016-08-30 07:36:55+00:00): Bitte Landuse-Flächen nicht mit Verkehrswegen o. ä. verbinden!
Florian77711 (2016-08-30 09:19:24+00:00): Auch bei Feldwegen, die direkt daran anschließen?
Werde es demnächst korrigieren.
Wolfgang B (2016-08-31 11:08:23+00:00): Servus!
Es ist allgemeiner Mappingusus, Landuseflächen und Verkehrswege, Bäche, etc. nicht zu verbinden, da dadurch spätere Bearbeitungen erschwert werden. Die Linie des Feldweges stellt eigentlich nur schematisch den Wegmittelpunkt dar. Der Weingarten endet jedoch schon am Grünstreifen am Rand des Weges.
Florian77711 (2016-08-31 15:45:49+00:00): Danke für die Erklärung :)
gileri (2016-08-28 10:51:36+00:00): Bonjour,

Je pense qu'il y a un soucis sur les tags du comissariat du 9ème :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439411834
Olyon (2016-08-28 23:35:44+00:00): j'ai fait les modifications. Je suis allé trop vite et j'ai laissé les tags du fichier source du grand lyon. Merci pour le signalement.
Endres Pelka (2016-08-28 19:47:13+00:00): Dlaczego zamieniasz addr:city na jakiś "addr:place_1"?
Arnebius (2016-08-28 20:07:18+00:00): Zwykła omyłka, właśnie poprawiłem
Goffredo (2016-08-27 21:51:54+00:00): Ci sarebbe da sistemare il tag opening_hours, come descritto dal Wiki: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours.

Inoltre, il tag addr: street andrebbe normalizzato in Via Einaudi, e tale strada deve esistere nei dintorni.
user_2275929 (2016-08-28 11:25:01+00:00): Confermo l'effettova esistenza di Via Einaudi, perpendicolare a Via Enrico Mattei, tuttavia confermo di non averle segnate. Gli orari sono disponibili anche sul sito internet dell'attività, che per chi non ne avesse conoscenza, risulta anche da una banale ricerca su Google. Provvederò a sistemare anche questi tag appena salgo dal pc, ora dal trlefono ho grosse difficoltà nel modificare
Goffredo (2016-08-28 11:59:37+00:00): Fai pure con calma, non era mia intenzione mettere fretta :-) .

Il problema dell' opening_hours è il formato, ho visto che hai usato Lun-Sab ma deve essere usato il formato specificato nella pagina wiki.

Se vuoi il formato lo metto a posto io, ma per i nomi delle vie non so quali sono. Puoi segnare i nomi tramite una nota sulla mappa, se ti va.
user_2275929 (2016-08-29 12:05:57+00:00): inseriti nomi sia di Via Einaudi che di Via Mattei e corretto formato orari
Goffredo (2016-08-27 21:52:47+00:00): Questo sembra un edificio, forse building=industrial sarebbe meglio di landuse=industrial? :-)
user_2275929 (2016-08-28 11:11:20+00:00): Sì, hai ragione. Ti sto scrivendo dal telefono, im questo momento non ho il pc sottomano. Se vuoi modifica tu oppure ci penso io appena salgo dal pc, dal telefono non riesco a modificare
user_2275929 (2016-08-29 12:09:26+00:00): corretto tag da landuse=industrial a building=industrial
Hjart (2016-08-27 22:26:30+00:00): Det her var ikke smart lavet. Derfor har jeg reverteret
Niels Beck (2016-08-28 06:47:12+00:00): Hej igen!
Jeg tænkte nok du ville give lyd fra dig! Hmm.
Jeg kørte faktisk vejen igår på cykel. Det jeg ville markerer, men ikke lykkedes med er:
Pedestrian/bikeing allowed! Jeg er klar over det ikke helt lykkedes!! Samtidig er det lidt følsomt, idet jeg resikerer hele Christiania står ved min gadedør een af dagene! Kommunen har lavet en cykelrute mellem Nyhavn og Amager! Derfor er der "biking allowed" og derfor anvendes stien til cykling. Pedestrian only som du har tilbageført det til er ikke korrekt!!! Ruteplanlæggeren skal kunne anvise denne rute! Det er en cykelrute!!! Jeg forsøger mig igen med en anden løsning, idet jeg er enig i ikke at have fundet den gyldne middelvej endnu!
Vh.
Niels
Hjart (2016-08-28 07:36:10+00:00): Der var jo i forvejen en bicycle=yes på de relevante dele af gågaderne, så det var jo slet ikke nødvendigt at gøre noget ekstra.
Hjart (2016-08-28 08:48:55+00:00): Forsøgte du med ruteplanlæggeren inden du begyndte at lave ændringer?
Så vidt jeg kan se af https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=55.67489%2C12.60242%3B55.67297%2C12.60715 virker det fint nok allerede (bemærk at de brugte data højst sandsynligt er fra før dine ændringer.)
Niels Beck (2016-08-28 15:48:29+00:00): Den ruteplanlægger jeg brugte virkede ikke! Jeg prøver den du anviser!
jeg er iøvrigt ikke helt tilfreds med markeringen gågade! Der er tale om en officiel cykelsti etableret af Københavns Kommune! Rundt i Christiania er der flere eksempler på stumper af cykelstier. Strækningen anvendes som cykelsti. Hvad er begrundelsen for markeringen som gågade? Der er slet ikke tale om gader men om stier! 
Vh.
Niels
Niels Beck (2016-08-28 15:52:19+00:00): Med hensyn til betegnelserne "designated" contra bicycle=yes er "designated" lige et step videre og trinnet før ændring til egentlig cykelsti.
Mvh.
Niels

PS Jeg bruger normalt ruteplanlæggeren
http://openrouteservice.org
giver talrige valgmuligheder.
Hjart (2016-08-28 16:17:44+00:00): Jeg har kun været på Christiania få gange og det er flere år siden sidst nu, så jeg er ikke helt bekendt med forholdene, men så vidt jeg forstår benyttes gaderne primært til gående trafik. Forestil dig at vi har en primærvej, hvor der er cykelbaner på begge sider, men derfor kan vi altså ikke pludselig lave den om til en highway=cycleway. Er det ikke noget tilsvarende der gælder her?
Hjart (2016-08-28 16:21:58+00:00): Vil du diskutere kategoriseringen af gaderne i området skal du formentlig have fat i https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ernst%20Poulsen, som ser ud til at være rigtig godt kendt der.
Hjart (2016-08-28 16:36:36+00:00): Bemærk at Mælkebøtten først blev tagget bicycle=yes for 4 dage siden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41670456. Det kan være grunden til at det endnu ikke virker i openrouteservice.
Niels Beck (2016-08-29 10:33:24+00:00): det sker jeg lægger en cykeltur omkring Christiania. Der er ikke noget fast mønster i hvad der er cykelsti og gågade i praksis. På vores kort er der da også flere forskellige stumper af cykelstier, rundt mellem gågaderne. Folk er flinke til at tage hensyn til hinanden, egentlig gågade er nærmest betinget af hvor mange personer der er tilstede på det givne tidspunkt. På stille perioder kan der cykles over hele Christiania.
Hjart (2016-08-29 10:37:23+00:00): Ok. Har du mulighed for at lave en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapillary sekvens ad bemeldte nye cykelrute, så vi andre kan se hvordan den egentlig ser ud?
Niels Beck (2016-08-29 11:04:57+00:00): Ja da! Rigtig god ide! Jeg kører turen og lægger billedsekvensen ud!
utack (2016-08-27 22:54:50+00:00): Laut mapillary ist hier aber, wie eingetragen war, die HNR 6a
Ist das so sicher richtig?

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=0ZulaRpkRZvHaivTLv0kMg
utack (2016-08-27 22:55:41+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=rsJewite2Y1iDeqJUP6bNw&lat=51.064657&lng=13.746897&z=17
user_5359 (2016-08-28 05:48:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
maraf24 (2016-08-28 18:14:04+00:00): Nazwa Ogród Zoologiczny była tu od dawna. Nikt nie zgłaszał uwag.
Zmianę należy przedyskutować, a nie wykonywać bazując na podstawie zawartości strony oficjalnej. 
I wiesz o tym, bo ja już złosiłem zastrzeżenia do tej zmiany.
☆Finvenkulo (2016-08-28 19:12:13+00:00): W porządku, przepraszam za kłopot, nie będę się kłócił z kimś z dłuższym stażem w edytowaniu OSM.
Alecs01 (2016-08-28 10:37:24+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, please note the hotel was already on the map https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3992510541 I deleted tour entry
mueschel (2016-08-30 15:53:29+00:00): Hi Dave,
found 6 ways with a strange tag, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373340787
Could you have a look and remove it?
Cheers, Jan
DaveF (2016-08-30 18:56:37+00:00): Fixed.
Thanks for letting me know.
Hjart (2016-12-10 21:15:21+00:00): Jeg vil mene at sådan en som f.eks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439421768 ligner en decideret markvej og dermed bedst klassificeres som https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
highflyer74 (2016-08-30 12:46:50+00:00): Hello!

Can you check this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75710126? What does fuel:clamc=yes mean?

Thanks for your help!
user_5359 (2016-08-28 05:55:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the building http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337798930 . Your node is a duplicate entry.
geow (2016-08-29 22:02:45+00:00): Hi bergfex, die mtb:scale=5 und mtb:scale:uphill=5, die du gelöscht hast, waren eine valide Information, sie haben ja gerade dokumentiert, dass man hier bergauf nur Tragen und bergab allenfalls Trial-Fahrer auf ihre Kosten kommen, ggf. wäre bei T5 auch mtb:scale=6 gerechtfertigt, siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:mtb:scale

Ich würde mich daher freuen, wenn du die mtb-tags auf allen 4 Wegen wieder herstellen würdest.
Danke
geow
bergfex1975 (2016-08-30 10:07:14+00:00): Hi Goew, danke für Deinen Beitrag. Ich habe einen Teil meiner Korrektur korrigiert: Bis zum Punkt lat="47.350650" lon="11.064520" ist theoretisch MTB-"Schieben" möglich (=mtb:scale=5 und mtb:scale:uphill=5). Danach bis zum Westgipfel aufgrund des Klettergeländes (UIAA 1+) auch theoretisch nicht mehr möglich.
Nakaner (2016-08-29 07:16:29+00:00): Die Lösung ist, dieses schrottig gemappte Multipolygon entweder zu löschen oder eben keine Straßen als äußeren Ring zu verwenden. Das Flächenrendering ist nämlich exakt die Füllfarbe (und auch der Layer passt) wie ein highway=residential.

Das Entfernen der TMC-Tags war nicht relevant. Das Problem dürfte entweder bei osm2pgsqls Multipolygonverarbeitung oder bei OSM Carto liegen. Beide scheren sich nicht um TMC-Tags. Letzterer hat die nicht mal in seiner Datenbank.

[hier bitte einen Rant über Mapper einfügen, die meinen, dass man die Tags für die MP-Fläche auch auf den Outer-Way taggen kann]
iWowik (2016-09-05 07:24:35+00:00): Раз вам статус Песчанки http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3568958 не ясен, то зачем было портить правильно затегированное?
Похоже, что вы не разобрались чем населенный пункт город Красноярск отличается от муниципального образования городского округа Город Красноярск
SomeoneElse (2016-09-16 14:14:17+00:00): Hello,
What exactly are http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439433883 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439433882 ?  They have no tags on them currently.  Is it supposed to be the outline of a school?
What does "this is a changeset generated by geoMapTool " mean?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2016-09-16 17:02:05+00:00): 你好，
究竟是什么http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439433883和http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439433882？他们没有标签对他们目前。难道应该是一所学校的轮廓？
什么是“这是由geoMapTool产生变更”是什么意思？
诚挚的问候，
安迪
Supaplex (2016-08-29 17:33:30+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Pilot777 (2016-09-05 05:52:00+00:00): вандализм!!!
user_5359 (2016-08-28 05:58:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your way and your changeset.
Clarys (2017-05-30 22:34:06+00:00): Ruta N° 15
Alecs01 (2016-08-28 11:16:43+00:00): Thansk but the amphitheater is already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/57304 I deleted your entry
b-jazz (2022-05-03 16:57:06+00:00): I don't know Pre's Trail details, but the segment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/439441902 doesn't seem to be part of the chipped bark jogging path. So just checking in to see if you know more. thx.
AlaskaDave (2022-05-04 04:02:54+00:00): Funny coincidence: I just noticed some other trail segments tagged with name=Pre's Trail that I'm sure are incorrect. I just haven't had time to fix them. 

My guess is that the name got propagated onto those segments by accident. I'll bicycle over to Alton Baker Park at some point and try to straighten those issues out but I'm fairly certain that the way you referred to above isn't part of Pre's Trail.
Mónica Rocca (2016-08-28 05:31:49+00:00): Zona de derrumbe. Avenida cerrada al tránsito vehicular.
user_5359 (2016-08-28 06:52:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice a residential building isn’t a castle :/
iWowik (2016-09-05 08:05:15+00:00): Прежде, чем пользоваться схемой тегирования вам стоило с ней поближе ознакомится, чтобы по крайней мере использовать ее правильно.

1) Отношение 
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1895222
не может быть членом associatedStreet в роли house
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet#Members

2) Этот тип отношений уже объявляли устаревшим, правда потом оставили, но мнения разделились почти пополам http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:associatedStreet#Deprecation_.22blessing.22 
посему удалять старую схему, тем более с зданий-relations есть вандализм. Исправьте за собой свои ошибки.
d1g (2016-09-05 09:51:04+00:00): С 1 согласен: со школы адрсные теги снять на отдельную точку, а её включить в associatedStreet 

со 2 пока открытый вопрос т.к. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:street пока что хуже поддерживается чем associatedStreet
Supaplex (2016-08-29 17:33:58+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-08-29 17:34:22+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-03-31 18:14:55+00:00): Hi, what's the source for these routes?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6535295
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6562171
The northern one even goes through private property, I wonder if it's still accessible.
juhanjuku (2023-03-31 18:25:48+00:00): Hi, source is my gps. We have used this route several times with bicycles.
To be honest, last time maybe 3 years ago. There was no problems passing private properties.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-04-01 12:03:21+00:00): The problem I have with it is that it looks like your personal route. If everyone starts to add them we'll drown in them. There are more specialized services for this like Komoot.

>There was no problems passing private properties.

The exact place I'm talking about is here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61328529
I'm kinda interested if the owners are ok with it or they just didn't see you / bother with it. It looks like a shortest route between Keila and Saue and is likely to be routed through. Access tags could be set there.

I once hiked abroad on an official route through private property to be greeted by a dog who didn't want to let me through.
juhanjuku (2023-04-01 16:31:29+00:00): I can't understand your point. Why can't I put here nice route for others to follow? We can have different views about OSM purpose and I'm glad we have here something for everyone.
I see, you have several edits in Estonia, so I assume you know about 'every mans right' in Estonia. By law, everyone can pass trough private land if there is no fence on sign from owner
Pikse (2023-04-01 17:23:42+00:00): This doesn't seem right to me either, and it's not only about our personal views. The point is that the data in OSM is supposed to be verifiable, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

GPS data (user knowledge) can be used to verify that the path exists on the ground. Whether this path is part of some route is another matter which needs separate verification. There should be way signs or an information board, or publication independent of particular mapper, based on which other users can collaborate and improve this data.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-04-01 17:29:18+00:00): >Why can't I put here nice route for others to follow?

Because it's an arbitrary personal route. This data is not verifiable and subjective, it's not marked and not publicized as an "official" route. I can make so many IMO nice routes you'll tire of managing relations when editing roads. They'll also create noise on maps like https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/ . There are many nice routers which can help with creating a custom route.

Every mans right doesn't apply to yards which is the case here, that's why I'm curious.

"Luba viibida võõral maatükil, välja arvatud õuemaal, eeldatakse olevat, kui omanik ei ole maatükki piiranud või tähistanud viisil, millest ilmneb tahe piirata võõraste viibimist maatükil, või kui tahe piirata viibimist ei ilmne muudest asjaoludest."
https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/117032023031?leiaKehtiv
juhanjuku (2023-04-01 18:50:07+00:00): If you look at waymarkedtrails in Estonia, you see that I have put there almost all official hiking routes which exist in Estonia (except far south) Where do you see noise? I'm looking on every 'nice routers' you suggest and I can't find any new routes where to go at weekends, so for me those unverified, unofficial routes from other hikers in OSM are very welcomed. 
You sound here like government officials whos only purpose is to follow rules, forgetting that OSM was made by community to serve needs of community. If you need official, all points verified map, you can take Maaameti maps. They are way more detailed and accurate. Or are you building competitor to official maps, why we need this?
dgmapping (2023-04-01 20:08:48+00:00): It's just a matter of principle - OSM is not a suitable place for storing or sharing your personal favorite routes. There are so many better platforms for that.

PS: Maa-ameti maps are not always very accurate, especially when it comes to small paths and trails in the woods. In some cases OSM data can be better.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-04-02 07:51:23+00:00): >Where do you see noise?
I don't. Because most of the trails are official, great work BTW! 

But if everyone starts to add their personal routes this could get complicated. Right now there are only those 2 which just raise a question, but if we started to add them it will change.

I do think we need some rules.
user_5359 (2016-08-28 08:04:22+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Der Name steht im Niederländischen für Kanalinspektionskamera. Ist dort eine Firma, die solches anbietet? Hat die Firma denn auch einen Namen?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-05-04 10:58:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58675712 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some remaining unlikely ATMs in Iraq (most already removed).
Durko_freemap (2016-09-01 18:37:13+00:00): Zdravim Slondo,
poprosim Vas nepouzivajte tag name= , ak dany objekt nema vlastne meno. To ze ide o "bytovy dom" je obsiahnute v tagu building= (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:building). Poprosim Vas povymazavajte ten tag name=bytovy dom. Vdaka Durko
dieterdreist (2016-08-28 15:28:16+00:00): please also set an operator for post offices and mind the capitalization in names (inizio maiuscolo), thank you
Supaplex (2016-08-29 17:35:27+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Yamenos (2017-12-15 07:11:12+00:00): The company name is Al-Takamul Engineering Company
شركة التكامل الهندسية (قشوع)
الطبيعة: مبنى خاص شركة تجارية
Nakaner (2016-08-28 13:37:21+00:00): The revert stopped for an currently unknown reason at 09:04 UTC. I will continue the revert at about 19:00 UTC.
Derick Rethans (2016-08-31 09:39:53+00:00): Hi! It seems you have mapped Barnes Wallis twice? Which one is the right one? This node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4370702737 or this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4370699570 ?
Alecs01 (2016-08-28 10:44:23+00:00): This is not a hotel but a cruise ship, which doesn't belong to OSM, deleted
fra76mm (2016-09-14 12:20:17+00:00): Ciao, cosa significa questo changeset ?
Se è una cosa personale ti chiedo di farne il revert.
Владимир К (2016-08-29 06:51:29+00:00): палатка - не название
trigpoint (2016-08-29 13:46:57+00:00): Hi, Totters Hostel was already mapped, I have therefore removed your duplication.
Also what is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4370785500 a view of, it seems to be surrounded by trees?
singingcarols (2016-08-29 17:11:38+00:00): The Totters Hostel on the map is wrong which is why I placed the new one in the correct position. I couldn't remove the other one. So if you can then please do. The viewpoint is of the quarry, the lake and the city. That area there is actually a break in the trees or the path winds over the trees providing a nice view below.
trigpoint (2016-08-30 12:13:45+00:00): Totters Hostel was already in the the correct place in OSM, unfortunately maps.me replaces some hotels/hostels with incorrect locations Looking at maps.me I can see this is what has happened here and i can understand your confusion.
Allroads (2017-03-05 18:30:11+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dgive_way
Since the yield sign on the approach applies to only one travel direction, that direction can usually be deduced by finding the shorter distance to the priority intersection. However, a few yield signs are on 2-way streets between closely-spaced junctions, making it necessary to identify the travel direction that yields. Where needed, this can be done using direction=forward or direction=backward, relating yield direction to OSM forward/backward of the way that contains the highway=give_way node.
dvdhoven (2017-03-05 19:11:14+00:00): Kun je in normaal Nederlands aangeven wat je probleem is? Ik begrijp hier geen jota van.
dvdhoven (2017-03-05 19:13:01+00:00): En als je vind dat het fout is, dan pas je het gewoon aan. Heel jammer, want ik heb er mijn best op gedaan, maar goed als een ander het beter weet dan is dat maar zo
Allroads (2017-03-05 19:17:54+00:00): Ik was benieuwd, verwijzing naar wiki, ik lees het als, dat er ook forward en backward op moet, want het geldt maar van 1 kant. Misschien discussie op het forum.
VictorIE (2025-09-19 09:08:50+00:00): Hi, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32788511/history

I'm wondering what "Gotetti Ring" refers to here.
Tomas Straupis (2016-08-28 15:00:52+00:00): Crap.me šlamštas atstatytas.
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-08-28 14:05:53+00:00): На углу Жамбыла-Достык находится гимназия 35 или 159?
Alecs01 (2016-08-28 10:58:37+00:00): Lo hai già creato di nuovo? è giusto qui o quest'altro lungo via Raffaello Sanzio? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4369834945 e non usare le maiuscole per favore