piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-10-15 12:14:17+00:00): Dag Nölke,

Van de PDOK en Verbeter de Kaart van het Kadaster word ik niets wijzer.
Het straatnaambord op de hoek geeft aan Hoogstraat. Precies in het gedeelte dat je hebt veranderd in Markt.
Wellicht nog even kijken naar je edits?
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=204434.44&geometry.y=371558.37&zoomlevel=14.98

MVG
eggie
Nölke75 (2021-10-18 06:26:54+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

er staat nu een straatnaambord met Martkt zie wijziging  #112636654.
Maar ik ga nog even navraag bij de gemeente doen over de onduidelijkheid van dit stukje.

MVG
Nölke
eggie (2021-10-18 07:06:30+00:00): Top!..
Mapse verder
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:19:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
DominikGM (2022-01-29 10:56:38+00:00): Hi Phil,

you've set the delivery-times to many pedestrian-streets here to "Mo-Fr". But there are signs which indicate "werktags" which means "Mo-Sa" in Germany (see e.g. https://www.adac.de/verkehr/recht/verkehrsvorschriften-deutschland/samstag-werktag/).

I've seen it on this road-sign (on the entry to Parmaplatz): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=760532901288947&focus=photo
But that's from 2016. Did this change to explicitly "Mo-Fr" since then?


Cheers,

Dominik
philipgriggs (2022-02-01 13:30:39+00:00): I used the same 2016 mapillary image in your link. Is the best practice to tag it like `motor_vehicle:conditional=delivery @ (Mo-Sa 18:30-11:00; PH off)`?
DominikGM (2022-02-02 18:40:38+00:00): Ok. As far as I can see, yes.

But here it's conditionally allowed for all kind of non-pedestrians/vehicles, e.g. also cargobikes. Is then `access:conditional` the correct one?

BTW: You have an idea how to tag  the "Zufahrt Gäste Dom-Hotel frei"? That's a tough one, I would say.
DominikGM (2022-02-02 20:02:22+00:00): Perhaps `vehicle:conditional` is better then: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/vehicle:conditional#values
AntMadeira (2021-10-15 14:24:48+00:00): Olá, Blubberbernd.

Vi que adicionaste um polígono de palce=village a Santiago da Guarda. Estes polígonos não são verificáveis e duplicam informação que já existe neste ponto [1]. São dados que não devem ser adicionados por não terem qualquer utilidade.

Se não tiveres nenhuma objeção, irei reverter este changeset.

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.

[1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4087936843
pitfire (2021-10-15 11:37:59+00:00): Hallo snowmover,
bitte Kontaktdaten nicht doppelt eintragen. Siehe auch: 
"DE:Key:phone u. DE:Key:contact"
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:19:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
Filip009 (2021-10-15 13:04:18+00:00): Hello, for future mapping I reccommend using plugin "building tools" with which this work will be done so easy and all the buildings would be rectangularized or orthogonalized. If you do not know how to use him here is manual https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools. If you do not want to install him, use at least "Q" fo rectangularizing and "O" for orthogonalizing.
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
RH Terre Haute Mapper (2021-10-14 15:23:08+00:00): Additional credit: IndianaMap and Bing (I forgot to include these and iD didn't fill that in automatically)
aceman444 (2022-07-31 11:27:56+00:00): Vsetky zmeny vratene do povodneho stavu, nakolko boli nespravne.
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
Wilmer Osario (2021-10-19 09:47:28+00:00): Please do not remove the name of the ramps, called "distribuidores", because those are the official and colloquial names that are given to these types of roads in Venezuela. Their names are very important in road navigation in this country.
VigotheCarpathian (2021-10-19 17:14:38+00:00): See changeset: 112667609 for details.
aceman444 (2022-07-31 11:38:29+00:00): Opravene.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-30 10:03:06+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3619907 if you remember this place or are still mapping nearby?
wombatmaper (2023-03-30 11:57:05+00:00): Sadly no, I was only visiting once on that day.
aceman444 (2022-07-31 11:27:46+00:00): Vsetky zmeny vratene do povodneho stavu, nakolko boli nespravne.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
aceman444 (2025-04-29 23:02:17+00:00): Opravene, kedze tu nespravne odstranujete obrys budovy, ktora existuje aj nad zemou.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
save2desk (2021-10-16 15:45:43+00:00): Но тоннель существует и используется. Почему он должен быть удалён?
Glassman (2021-10-20 16:17:58+00:00): #TIP: Instead of deleting an object then redrawing it, just revise the existing shape. That saves the history of an object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112510680
Glassman (2021-10-20 16:19:50+00:00): #TIP: When editing in distant geographical areas, save and upload your changeset before moving to the next location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112510680
Lee Carré (2021-10-14 17:16:15+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
trigpoint (2021-10-14 19:24:04+00:00): It is a smallish area, just happens to cross 180 degrees within a single country
Lee Carré (2021-10-15 08:55:32+00:00): Sigh. Fine. Smaller BOUNDING BOXES, please.
pitfire (2021-10-15 12:26:56+00:00): Hallo snowmover,
Eingänge bekommen keine Adresse und kein level. Mit zusätzlichen Eigenschaften können die Rollstuhltauglichkeit, Nutzungserlaubnis, Überwachung, Öffnungszeiten und weiteres dargestellt werden. 
Bitte die Kontaktakdaten nicht doppelt eintragen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-08 00:26:03+00:00): klasyfikacja w OSM nie odpowiada ściśle klasyfikacji urzędniczej.

Skąd taka informacja że każda droga wojewódzka to highway=secondary?
Glassman (2021-10-20 16:21:46+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q". Otherwise your edits looks great. Can you square this building so it looks more like the roof line?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112513098
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 18:26:39+00:00): Не надо добавлять точки просто с тегом name=* Если не знаете, как добавить тот или иной объект, спросите в ТГ-канале: @ruosm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112513266
Glassman (2021-10-20 16:23:40+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112513342
Glassman (2021-10-20 16:24:48+00:00): We usually tag all of the land around the area as a park. This looks like a playground. Can you fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112513342
rab (2021-10-16 21:15:07+00:00): #10091 is not finished!  Still waiting aiting for promised third pass validation.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112066850#map=16/-14.8764/27.9131
rab (2021-10-16 21:52:48+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=14.12549&lat=49.88331&zoom=6

https://www.openstreetmap.org/history#map=18/-15.14492/27.81489
rab (2021-10-16 21:58:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-15.12774/27.79412

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-15.24685/27.88378
ftcat (2021-10-17 12:41:15+00:00): Hi rab,

You don't want them to pass through again, the imagery has been updated and they would have to start all over again. new buildings and others no longer exist same with tracks paths and roads. Something I keep saying the situation on the ground is very fluid.
ftcat (2021-10-17 13:05:58+00:00): Also images are composites so you have really strange effects where parts of fields are green and parts are dry, roads are offset where the imagery has been merged and buildings come and go as you zoom in and out. The pivot shown here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-15.0054/28.1789) did not appear in earlier Maxar imagery but does now and vanishes altogether as you zoom out
ftcat (2021-10-17 13:32:18+00:00): It is very difficult for people living in the Western World to understand that when your house is made from mud and grass it will only last for a couple of years before it has been destroyed by the elements and the termites. You build a new one and it is going to be in a different place. Even quite substantial structures may not last as the termites will destroy the rafters and roof beams if they are not treated
russdeffner (2021-10-17 16:23:19+00:00): Hi rab and ftcat, I don't know much about this project - I just saw it was very close to 100% validated (1st/normal pass). Typically if a project will get a 3rd pass it is by only a few more experienced validators, so if we make them aware of the imagery, they should still be able to improve things like road classification consistency, etc. However, I am not involved in managing this project; you can find the project number in the original changeset comment and then either leave a message there, or find the author and message them direct.

Happy Mapping!
rab (2021-10-17 17:51:58+00:00): ftcat, you are probably right.

It seems that the new maxar images are not available in ID by now. This would also cause additional problems.
phd0 (2021-10-15 17:06:10+00:00): bonjour attention a ne pas changer la ligne HTA en même temps que le poteau.
je corrige pour vous.
火箭苦力怕i (2021-10-31 07:12:14+00:00): 您不会拿JOSM画公交线🐴
luisforte (2021-10-14 20:48:28+00:00): Viva,
As estações ferroviárias já se encontram definidas em osm!
Ao criares novas estações (como Alcântara-Mar ou Braço de Prata) estás a criar uma segunda estação numa só estação. O melhor será editares a estação  já existente(que além de um nó, poderá ser um área ou uma relação) e assim corrigir/adicionar a informação que pretendes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations
Luis
Gureumeee (2021-10-14 18:02:39+00:00): Reversed oneway for Rua Dom Pedro II. Source: Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2021-06-26
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112514688
DaveF (2021-10-15 14:45:19+00:00): Hi
landuse=grass in not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct.

I've flagged it as an error:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748#issuecomment-940155347
bretigny-osm (2021-10-14 18:12:29+00:00): Source : relevé terrain
Carto'Cité (2021-12-22 12:14:28+00:00): Bonjour bretigny-osm,
J'ai remarqué tes contributions concernant les aménagements cyclables et j'ai bien noté qu'il s'agissait de relevé de terrain. J'ai quelques interrogations sur les descriptions qui correspondraient à des erreurs assez habituelles. Par exemple cette voie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/785975728 était décrite en path ce qui semblait juste (le contributeur qui l'a ajoutée est un contributeur expérimenté sur les aménagements cyclables). Elle ne devrait être décrite en piste que si un panneau B22a est installé. Or au regard de la situation les piétons peuvent bien l’emprunter ce qui justifie l'usage de highway=path. Par contre il semblerait qu'il y a bien deux espaces distincts entre piétons et cycliste ce qui impliquerait d'ajouter bicycle=designated et segregated=yes ce qui permet de l'interpréter comme une piste même en l'absence de panneau.
J'ai profité de cette modification prolonger cette voie en me basant sur la heatmap de Strava.
N'hésite pas si tu as la moindre question ou remarque :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
blackboxlogic (2021-10-27 02:55:47+00:00): Please use Title Case for names of things. I've changed this to "Pine Tree Lane"
blackboxlogic (2021-10-27 02:53:37+00:00): addr:housenumber really should have addr:street with it. It's not much use on its own.
Kport Addressing Officer (2021-10-27 12:31:27+00:00): I thought I had the address already entered.   It is Hunters Way and originally the street was shorter, so I extended the street and added the number.  I must have missed confirming that I had the street name in.   Sorry
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
Pt873 (2021-10-14 18:48:48+00:00): Olá. Essa rua existe mesmo? Me parece que nesse local há um terreno, e não uma via.
sasQuach (2021-10-15 18:57:59+00:00): Olá Pt873,

Sim, confirmei esta estrada usando Strava e imagens de 03/10/2021.

Feliz mapeamento!
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:19:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
eggie (2021-10-15 11:58:08+00:00): Hi Fabrizio,

Ik changed highway=unclassifie unto highway service and added a barrier=gate.
Greetz,
eggie
PT-53 (2021-10-15 07:10:42+00:00): HJallo maramutze2018,
Du hast in diesem, Änsderungssatz u.a. diese beiden Knoten
_ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5501737617/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5501737618/history
um mehrere Meter verschoben.
Ich halte das für eine Verschlechterung und möchte Dir diesen Tipp geben:

Luftbilder haben immer einen kleineren oder größeren Versatz. Bevor man Straßen nach Luftbildern ausrichtet sollte man immer diesen Versatz vorher korrigieren.

In Baden-Württemberg steht uns in OSM die amtliche Karte Maps4BW zur Verfügung. In dieser sind die Gebäude lagegenau und mit dem EG-Grundriß eingezeichnet.
Maps4BW kann in den Editoren JOSM und ID jeweils als Hintergrund eingeblendet werden  und wir dürfen davon legal abzeichnen.
Mit lagegenau eingezeichneten Gebäuden kann man dann auch den Luftbildversatz berichtigen.
Wiki - Maps4BW:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW
Wiki - Luftbilder ausrichten:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Luftbilder_vor_dem_Abzeichnen_ausrichten

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Am besten mit den Bing-Luftbildern. Die sind dort am neuesten (aus 2019)

Du hast keine Quelle für Deine Änderungen angegeben. Warst Du vor Ort?

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2021-10-31 08:42:23+00:00): Hallo maramutze2018, 
es wäre schön, wenn Du noch reagieren würdest.
Grüße
maramutze2018 (2021-10-31 16:16:19+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
danke für die Hinweise. Ich war vor Ort und habe mir einige Wege in und um Rottenacker angesehen. Anschließend habe ich die Karte, dort, wo sie mir nicht richtig erschien, ergänzt oder korrigiert. Dazu nehme ich in der Regel immer die Luftbilder. Auch wenn ich weiß, dass es einen Versatz gibt, erscheint mir das Luftbild immer noch als die beste Möglichkeit, um eine halbwegs korrekte Karte zu bekommen. Dass Maps4BW eingeblendet werden kann, habe ich bislang nicht registiert. Danke für den Hinweis. Da gibt es dann wenigstens eine Kontrollmöglichkeit.
Wenn die Verschiebung der Punkte aus Deiner Sicht eine Verschlechterung darstellt, ändere sie wieder. Mir persönlich ist eine ganz korrekte Linienführung nicht so wichtig (bei Karten ja eh ein heikles Thema). Ich achte eher auf die Vollständigkeit der Daten, ergänze Wege oder Pfade und nehme auch nicht mehr existierende Wege heraus.
Grüße
maramutze2018
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:19:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
351293 (2021-10-14 19:45:01+00:00): Siehe Diskussion im anderen Changeset.
Es wäre allerdings noch gut, wenn Du deine Änderungen präzisier benennst, z.B. "Name Bahnübergang ergänzt" statt "lokale Änderungen". Letzteres ist nichtssagend und so muss immer nachgefragt werden, was Deine Intention war
LG
Hegau Bodensee (2021-10-14 19:50:00+00:00): Hi!

alles klar.

LG
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
Ars-UA (2021-10-20 15:12:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не добавляйте, пожалуйста, на общую карту несуществующие объекты (бары). Если увидели неточность, добавьте заметку и кто-нибудь из опытных пользователей исправит.
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
Pipeton (2021-10-14 19:16:06+00:00): A quien vea este conjunto de cambios: sé que está mal. Estoy buscando una solución y en cuanto pueda lo solucionaré.
rene78 (2021-10-17 19:42:28+00:00): Das Hotel hat aber noch nicht geöffnet. Deswegen ist das Tag tourism=hotel etwas verfrüht, würde ich sagen.
jeka p (2021-10-24 18:08:53+00:00): korregiert
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 17:54:03+00:00): У bing старые снимки. Как результат - геометрия далека от действительности. Лучше использовать более свежие Maxar и Esri. Перед редактированием настраивать смещение. Пользоваться клавишей Q для выравнивания углов.

Присоединяйтесь к сообществу в ТГ: @ruosm, где можете задать любые вопросы по редактированию.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112516797
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
SHARCRASH (2021-10-14 19:02:21+00:00): + new elements
ivanbranco (2022-01-21 21:11:20+00:00): Hi santon,

you added some checkpoint:type tags without a checkpoint tag. Is it checkpoint=hiking?
santon (2022-01-22 09:37:30+00:00): Hi ivanbranco,
right, I add this. I'm not that familiar with checkpoints and copied from a northwestern location. But I cannot find the 'origin' by overpass turbo to fix it there as well :-(
mueschel (2021-10-16 08:57:22+00:00): Hi,
please check these edits - there are 11 objects with only foreign tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992812146
maro21 (2021-10-19 16:23:26+00:00): Skąd ta nazwa?
Spider_ (2021-10-19 19:59:41+00:00): Z MPZP
SherbetS (2021-12-10 16:19:32+00:00): Thank you.
Glassman (2021-10-20 16:25:55+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112517858
Syl (2021-10-15 10:01:35+00:00): Bonjour, je viens d'annuler ce groupe de modifications, il remettait l'arrêt à son ancienne place (voir historique du nœud).
Syl (2023-09-02 12:00:17+00:00): Bonjour, je viens d'annuler cette modification.
Elle écrasait l'amélioration de la position que j'avais faite.
Merci de faire en sorte que cela n'arrive pas à nouveau au prochain import.
Syl (2021-10-15 10:09:37+00:00): Bonjour, je viens d'annuler ce groupe de modifications, il inversait de façon incorrecte le côté de la route de l'arrêt.
Cela a l'air d'être un problème de votre source vu que c'est la troisième fois que je corrige.
Syl (2021-10-15 10:09:26+00:00): Bonjour, je viens d'annuler ce groupe de modifications, il inversait de façon incorrecte le côté de la route de l'arrêt.
Cela a l'air d'être un problème de votre source vu que c'est la troisième fois que je corrige.
Syl (2021-10-15 10:23:50+00:00): Bonjour, je viens d'annuler ce groupe de modifications. Il déplaçait l'arrêt à son ancienne position.
Syl (2021-10-15 10:24:40+00:00): Bonjour, je viens d'annuler ce groupe de modifications. Il déplaçait l'arrêt à son ancienne position.
Syl (2021-10-15 10:20:35+00:00): Bonjour, je viens d'annuler ce groupe de modifications. Il déplaçait un arrêt de bus dans la station de métro.