piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:43:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:41:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:43:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:43:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:43:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:43:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
RicoElectrico (2018-09-30 22:33:13+00:00): Sorry, but you're in Poland ;)

So what you entered as name should really go into name:de.
GerdP (2017-10-17 05:44:20+00:00): Hi!
What means highway="path possible, but extremely dangerous" ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205949005
I assume you wanted to add this as a note?
Pfad-Finder (2017-10-17 07:40:08+00:00): There used to be a path/footway over the bridge (about 50cm wide, not official), but now large parts of the handrail are stolen and the risk to drop 20 meters to the ground is real. There is already one recently erected cross under the bridge. I dont wan't to encourage anybody to use this bridge for crossing the river. Look here: https://www.panoramio.com/photo/33464149
GerdP (2017-10-17 07:44:44+00:00): OK, that is understood. Question is what tag can be used to express this. Since there is no highway on the southern part of the bridge I wonder why you don't simple remove the highway tag.
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:42:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
Baloo Uriza (2017-10-16 20:06:53+00:00): Kinda looks like the park outline you added doesn't line up with the landuse.  What's with that description?  Kind of looks like ad copy.
Baloo Uriza (2017-10-16 21:55:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52996686 where the changeset comment is: Park geometry definitely is nonsensical, description also odd, moved lakeshore node
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:43:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:41:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
Stereo (2018-01-09 21:31:26+00:00): Hello, vill Gléck fir 2018! Kann et sin, dat déng Orthophotoen decaléiert sin?
R0bst3r (2017-10-17 20:04:33+00:00): Hallo mserve,
du hast hier wohl aus versehen auch das Gebäude Tag building=office gelöscht, ich habe das wieder hergestellt. Hast du den neuen Ort der Firma bereits eingetragen?
Viele Grüße
UT93 (2024-09-13 17:44:15+00:00): Grüsse
Wie genau begründet sich der Tiefere Sinn dieser drei (Wald)Schneisen, welche du in diesem Änderungssatz mitten in einem Wohngebiet erstellt hast?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533026020
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533026019
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533026017
silvan h (2024-09-14 22:34:22+00:00): This was seven years ago. I can't remember. I might have used the wrong dividers by accident.
geoaria (2019-05-10 11:19:28+00:00): سلام
رسم ها را به صورت جزیره و غیر متصل به راههای اصلی  ترسیم نکنید حتما اتصالا را برقرار کنید مورد شمال نطنز "برز" اصلاح شد
geoaria (2019-05-10 11:25:11+00:00): آیا رودخانه ترسیم شده از برز تا  هنجان وجود دارد و در صورت وجود چرا مطابق با مسیر رودخانه روی تصاویر ماهواره ایی ترسیم نشده است
OF0 (2017-10-17 05:32:04+00:00): Hallo Opendasi,

da ist doch kein Park. Was wolltest Du einzeichnen. Vielleicht können wir gemeinsam geignetere Tags finden.
DD1GJ (2017-10-17 05:59:12+00:00): Ich habe alle "Park-Edits" zurückgesetzt, da es erhebliche Kollateralschäden an den Häusern gab. Weitere Informationen zu OSM findest Du unter 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
OF0 (2017-10-17 16:01:12+00:00): Hallo DD1GJ,

hast Du 'ne Ahnung wie man eine Abfrage erstellt, die zum Beispiel alle Parks im Umkreis von 30 km markiert. Oder alle Parks in einem Landkreis?
R0bst3r (2017-10-17 19:56:55+00:00): Hallo Bernd Leon Z,
der Changeset hier ist sehr merkwürdig. 
Wenn der Betreiber eines Geschäftes wechselt, bleibt das Gebäude normalerweise bestehen. Ist das bei diesem ehemaligen Topkauf nicht so?
Im Osten hast du eine Ampel um mehrere hundert Meter verschoben. Das kann so nicht sein ...?!? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52994740
Bitte beachte, dass die Daten nach dem Speichern direkt online sind. Ich revertiere diese Änderungen für dich.
Viele Grüße
R0bst3r (2017-10-17 20:00:09+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53022846
msevilla00 (2017-11-01 11:16:54+00:00): Estimado Juan, desde la comunidad de editores de OSM hemos detectado un gran número de inclusiones de datos desde tu cuenta y observamos que muchas de ellas o no están bien etiquetadas o sospechamos pueden ser importaciones no documentadas.
Aquí tienes el hilo sobre tus ediciones en la lista de correos de Talk-es: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-es/2017-October/015509.html
Te agradeceríamos que te pusieras en contacto con nosotros pues si no procederemos a revertir tus ediciones al sospechar que no se ciñen a los protocolos de OpenStreetMap.
Gracias
eggie (2017-10-17 06:12:53+00:00): Tip: Een vogelkijkhut wordt getagd als leisure=bird_hide.
Verander je het zelf?
lakedistrict (2017-10-16 21:27:01+00:00): Hi lakeuk,

Thanks for your edit. However it is best to update the tags on the node rather than deleting it because the shop unit and address still physically exists. For this one you could have removed the name tag and changed shop=clothes to disused:shop=yes. Please keep this in mind for future edits, otherwise address data and history is lost.

Any questions just ask. 

lakedistrict :-)
lakedistrict (2017-10-16 21:30:58+00:00): I've managed to undelete both the Room and Native nodes and I've updated them to show that they're currently disused, along with fixmes to update in the future. :)
4004 (2017-10-16 22:07:47+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
если номера домов верны, то отлично, все отмечено правильно - поразительно, учитывая что это ваша 1 правка. тут некоторые и с 500 косячят
Такси 157 (2017-10-17 04:58:15+00:00): Я всю ольшанку практически нарисовал))) GrodnoMan мой аккаунт раньше был. Лень восстанавливать - сделай другой, т.к. хотел быстро устранить неточность.
4004 (2017-10-17 21:08:14+00:00): а, ну в таком случае добро пожаловать снова, и спасибо, что не бросаете это дело!
Polarbear (2017-10-18 21:08:24+00:00): Ein Sport-Vereinsheim kannst du wie folgt taggen:
amenity=community_centre
community_centre=club_home
community_centre:for=athlete
Schau hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre
R0bst3r (2017-10-17 19:47:09+00:00): Hallo pharma1696,
willkommen bei OSM.
Du hast die Apotheke hier umgezogen, stimmt den die Hausnummer dann noch?
Viele Grüße
pharma1696 (2017-10-18 22:05:30+00:00): Hallo und danke.
Die Adresse wurde vorher schon korrigiert - jetzt stimmt alles.
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:42:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:42:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:41:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:43:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:42:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
philippec (2019-03-30 15:08:40+00:00): Hangen die binnen of buiten ?  Dat is wel belangrijk.
philippec (2019-08-31 19:04:26+00:00): Er zijn grote verbouwingen bezig.  Er is niets te zien.  Ik heb https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5171969161
gewist.  Zie ook mapillary.
jaap de vries (2017-10-17 05:45:17+00:00): Beste Leo, Wat heb je precies aangepast aan de actuele situatie?
Graag zo goed mogelijk omschrijven zodat andere gebruikers van OSM het weten. Zie ook de OSM regels.
Leo Slager (2017-10-17 06:27:35+00:00): Beste Jaap, ik zie wat je bedoelt. Uit de opmerking die op de kaart was geplaatst blijkt dat het om de bushalte gaat, maar voor de volledigheid had ik dat hier ook nog een keer moeten beschrijven: bushalte verwijderd, lijn 860 rijdt hier niet meer.
jaap de vries (2017-10-17 06:41:45+00:00): 1) oke, heb je de busrelatie ook verwijderd?
3mnd is deze nog aangepast http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6841375#map=16/52.0269/5.5522&layers=N 
2) als je daarover vragen hebt kan je die het beste stellen aan de laatste mapper die dit heeft aangepast.
Leo Slager (2017-10-17 12:22:20+00:00): De busrelatie was 3 maanden geleden al gewijzigd. Alleen het fysiek opheffen van de bushalte moest nog gerealiseerd worden.
gormo (2017-10-17 15:43:12+00:00): I'm commenting this changeset as an example. In your import wiki page at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing#4._Data_Preparation you state that your changeset tags will include "import=yes". This changeset does not include this tag, also some others by you that I checked do not. Could you have a look at that? Thanks, gormo
VLD003 (2017-10-25 22:58:59+00:00): Hi gormo,
Thank you for your feedback. You are correct. Based on initial feedback for this import we decided to tag each way created by our team instead of adding it to the changeset tags, mainly because of community requests.  Having each way tagged also makes the process more transparent so the community can quickly give us detailed feedback if needed. 
So you can find #nsroadimport #thailand for the changeset comment and source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source) = digitalglobe & import = yes on all our elements.
Best,
Alexandra
treestryder (2017-11-20 06:04:52+00:00): I have undone all of these changes, as they were mostly incorrect. Can I ask, what you were trying to achieve? Maybe, we could work together in the future.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-11 14:32:18+00:00): Are you sure that there is lighthouse at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1863593260/history ?

see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1202785
4004 (2017-11-11 17:04:36+00:00): Czesc Mateusz,
There is (although it is a very small one, but the tag doesn't differentiate).
See: https://yandex.ru/maps/10274/grodno/?ll=23.826265%2C53.674758&z=19&l=sat%2Cskl%2Cstv%2Csta&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=23.826028%2C53.674738&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=240.152558%2C-4.281181&panorama%5Bspan%5D=81.756049%2C30.751903
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-11 18:04:58+00:00): I am not entirely sure whatever such small navigation light should be tagged as man_made=lighthouse.

It was a very good idea to add height tag, it explains situation well.
4004 (2017-11-11 20:07:07+00:00): well, it hasn't got the "light" part of the lighthouse seamark schema tagged, so probably won't be taken into account by seafarers, plus it's got the tourism tag on it. I can't really justify tagging it as a street lamp (which surround it), or as a beacon,
I should check out its night operation when I'm back in Hrodna
Matteo Calosi (2017-10-20 14:20:22+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro che il sentiero 751 sia dismesso? Credo sia semplicemente per intero un sentiero CAI veneto  e non SAT (il database loro conferma) quindi lo riaggiungerei
R0bst3r (2017-10-17 19:41:32+00:00): Hallo wilmersdorfer313,
dies könnte daran liegen, dass sie von einer man_made=bridge mit layer=1 verdeckt werden. Dies ist aber so gewollt bei osm.org.
Viele Grüße
wilmersdorfer313 (2017-11-04 18:20:33+00:00): Vielen Dank, R0bst3r! Soll ich jetzt die Diskussion abbestellen?
dieterdreist (2017-11-01 10:03:25+00:00): Hello Sciam Lab,

I have seen you "fixed" offsets in this changeset. May I ask how you determined the correct position? 
After your fixes there were intersections of buildings and pedestrian areas. Fixing an offset is usually quite complex, because you not only have to correct the position of one object but also the relative position of other nearby objects, and also the shape. For example lines that are straight in reality should remain straight in OSM, and angles should remain, etc.
Generally it is rarely worth the work that results from shifting things, if the offset is as small as in this changeset (1.2 meters), also because following mappers will not have the means to work with accuracy of 1 meter or submeter.
SciamLab (2017-11-08 14:51:59+00:00): Hello dieterdreist,
we've acquired the detailed data from a cadaster map. Also used few different GPS traces recorded recently. One of the building in the the changes is one of our property.
dieterdreist (2017-11-09 10:17:06+00:00): Thank you for your reply. Please be aware that we do not (only) care for absolute positional accuracy, but even more for topological / relative accuracy. Often moving one object requires to move also other objects to maintain properties like relative position and relation between things (axis, flight of facades, angles between things, etc.) 
As a legal sidenote: cadastre maps don't allow for positioning of objects (no georeferencing), and they are not (AFAIK, usually) a suitable source for edits, because they are usually copyrighted (unless we are talking about out-of-copyright maps) (being the proprietor of real estate doesn't make you automatically the proprietor of intellectual property contained in the cadastre maps).
DenisCarriere (2017-10-17 07:42:54+00:00): @DannyMcD

Please hold off on deleting of duplicate nodes, I know you can't help yourself.

These edits are for a class at Carleton University.

Please post any issues you have here:
https://github.com/TraceyLauriault/COMS2200A/issues

We can do a clean up afterwards (~1-2 weeks).
DannyMcD (2017-10-17 16:11:26+00:00): OK, I'll wait until things settle down.
DenisCarriere (2017-10-17 16:15:56+00:00): Thanks, I fully support what you're doing, just need one more week before we start removing duplicates and error prone features.
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:43:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
CloCkWeRX (2017-10-17 01:01:27+00:00): With this one, we can maybe add two points (Yangoora, the Restaurant; and Anderson Hill, the Winery) - what do you think?
BCNorwich (2017-10-17 05:30:40+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Can you give more details of the guest house, address, website, property located in.
Features added to the OSM database must be verifiable on the ground and there's not enough info to determine this features position, (in a front garden). So it ought to be corrected or removed. 
Regards Bernard
trigpoint (2017-10-17 09:32:40+00:00): Size of building suggests that this is a very unlikely place for a guest house.

Probably yet more maps.me personal marker rubbish
BCNorwich (2017-10-17 10:04:42+00:00): Hi trigpoint, I agree,and a response would be unusual but I usually wait a few days so a response could be made before going back and removing fiction. Also the house numbers in the building don't look right. 
Regards Bernard
Lora Karch (2017-10-23 19:13:34+00:00): The buildings in this change set are looking great as well!
burtlang (2017-10-23 21:15:29+00:00): When making particular changes to roads, such as adding the real name/alt_name why not continue your edits to make the entire road consistent?
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-28 23:08:06+00:00): HI I see that way 230135072 and adjoining have been downgraded from primary to tertiary, apparently following the opening of a bypass. If this is correct, please remove the A6136 ref. If this is still the A6136, please return to primary. The adjoining trunk link way also looks suspect as trunk links are supposed to end at a junction of some sort, not part way along a road. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
4004 (2017-10-17 21:35:49+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
если у мечети нет определенного имени собственного (как у христианских храмов, по именам святых и тп) то название Мечеть не нужно - оно уже подразумевается тегом, который вы поставили
Lora Karch (2017-10-23 19:12:19+00:00): Great job in fixing the roads from before!
literan (2017-10-17 09:41:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Скажите, а почему вы убираете слова из названия объекта торговли? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27285692 Обычно убирается родовое обозначение, однозначно определяемое тегами. Я не вижу, чтобы на этом полигоне были добавлены теги, описывающие именно "торгово-развлекательный центр". Не говоря уж о том, что в прочих тегах группы name вы ТРЦ или его перевод оставили.
R0bst3r (2017-10-17 19:35:02+00:00): Hallo KellerF,
willkommen bei OSM und Danke für deine Ergänzungen.
Die Hausnummer 6 habe ich neu positioniert, da diese die Straße geschnitten hat. Bedenke, dass die Hintergrundbilder Luftbilder sind, Dachform und Grundposition also verschieden sein können. Dazu kommt, dass Luftbilder einen Versatz haben können, d.h. die Bilder leicht verschoben gegenüber den Daten sind. Hier kann man auf der rechten Seite mit dem Ebenen Icon das Luftbild wechseln und das beste heraussuchen. Einfach ausprobieren.
Viele Grüße
Jason Harrison (2017-10-28 03:17:38+00:00): Hi, I noticed your changeset comment is "Adding new construction road".  You may consider using the highway=construction tag if the road is not currently usable.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction#Highways

In a nutshell, you currently have this highway tagged as highway=residential.  

Using the construction tag, you'd tag as: highway=construction AND construction=residential.
AkuAnakTimur (2017-10-17 08:25:50+00:00): Hello. What do you actually meant by "actual trail marked by Garmin"?
AdminOfPenangtrails (2017-10-30 08:58:37+00:00): sorry for late reply. the trail that we edited is based on data marked by me using garmin device.
AkuAnakTimur (2017-11-19 10:41:03+00:00): No problem. At least it clears things up.

One more thing, for your edits, do you use Bing imagery only, or other imageries (e.g. DigitalGlobe / Esri / Mapbox satellite) as well?
MosKartograf (2017-10-24 15:30:25+00:00): Здравствуйте! 3-й бауманский мост в Царицыно? Поясните, пожалуйста.
Alexander-II (2017-10-24 16:42:29+00:00): Добрый вечер. Спасибо, что заметили! Это опечатка, исправил. Там "3-й гротесковый мост" конечно же.
AnnaLALA (2017-10-17 02:50:04+00:00): Updated road lines and added in buildings
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-06-22 09:23:46+00:00): Olá erickdeoliveiraleal, posso perguntar uma coisa? desta forma aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260840138, esta forma tem o mesmo nome de seus pais direito e esquerdo ?? eu só vejo a tag ref lá, então quero deixar claro perguntando ao mapeador local. Muito obrigado
Alan Monasterios (2017-10-17 04:09:42+00:00): Sincor-SP - Sindicato dos Corretores de Seguro no Estado de São Paulo, Rua Dona Primitiva Vianco, 940 - 2° andar - Conj.03 - Centro, Osasco - SP, 06016-008
Владимир К (2017-10-17 06:26:18+00:00): почему вы не используете соответствующие категории?
compdude (2017-11-21 06:52:57+00:00): How come this road is a trunk? Seems like a full freeway to me.
Canyonsrcool (2017-11-21 13:55:22+00:00): I classify it as trunk because of how important it is relative to the network in Utah and what its main function is.  It is only 2 lanes in each direction, has a 55 mph speed limit because it runs through wetlands (that was one of the compromises between the state and the environmental groups who were suing to make the parkway not happen), carries less traffic than I-15, and is not an interstate. So with classifications being a measure of importance and function and motorway having specific defined characteristics (high speed being one of them) I feel comfortable with Legacy Parkway being a trunk classification.
compdude (2017-11-21 21:16:38+00:00): A road can be classed as motorway regardless of importance. And just because the speed limit is only 55 doesn't mean it shouldn't be tagged as a motorway. Many freeways have a 55 mph speed limit. NYC and Chicago even have interstates with a 45 mph speed limit.
Osm1980 (2017-12-08 18:09:50+00:00): salam moayene fani khodro ba in tag  moshakhas mishe
aj_34 (2019-04-26 12:29:30+00:00): Hi Ardiansyah Adnan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 517182319 as 'Residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Unclassified'
As of now correcting the data.Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.
nagy_balint (2017-11-15 17:02:40+00:00): Jó, hogy felkerült az új körforgalom, de közben sajnos sikerült eltüntetni Eger belterületének jelölését és egy ipari parkot. Ezeket visszaállítottam.
A körforgalmak helyes címkézéséről:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
user_6110846 (2018-01-04 12:25:52+00:00): названия в откат
vrmap (2017-12-05 10:28:04+00:00): Sei sicuro che via del Minatore e parte di via Carlo Montanari siano diventate footway? Io non ci sono stato di recente ma mi sembra strano.
Constable (2017-12-10 17:08:43+00:00): Hi there tytoalba, why did you change the highway tag value of this road section?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109428719/history
It still does look to me like a road, not a footway.
Thanks
Constable (2017-12-10 17:13:48+00:00): Other than that, you're supposed to use proper changeset comments. Using a simple "updates" as a comment to your edits does mean pretty much nothing. Something like "added roads", "replaced tertiary road with a footpath",... would perfectly work.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments.3F
Thanks!