piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2015-04-23 22:14:53+00:00): I OK. Skoro autor uwagi się nie odezwał to się tego zrobić lepiej nie da:)
deleted_account (2015-04-23 22:18:54+00:00): Oczywiście :) Info o parkingu jest. Na mikromapping pryzjdyie tutaj czas gdy objawi się lokalny mapper ;)
maraf24 (2015-04-23 22:11:17+00:00): http://ra.rejestrymedyczne.csioz.gov.pl/_layouts/15/ra/glowna.aspx?unikalneId=1029101%3B1&frame=frameApteka
Niestety, nie mają tam godzin otwarcia.
RicoElectrico (2015-04-24 15:57:03+00:00): Dlaczego ścieżki mają nazwę "Ścieżka"?
Później nawigacja będzie pokazywała to w spisie ulic ;-P
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-12 07:55:55+00:00): A czym się wyróżnia ta obwodnica w porównaniu do innych ekspresówek w PL? Może powinniśmy wszystkie takie dwupasmówki w Polsce otagować jako motorway? ;-)
deleted_account (2015-06-12 14:25:04+00:00): Jestem za, robiłem już do tego przymiarki, wszelka pomoc mile widziana :) Niestety z automatu tego nie zrobimy, bo niektóre Ski nie są motorwayami, trzeba więc przejrzeć drogą przez Mapilary albo GSa. Za to gdy już ukończymy, zyskamy cenną informację gdzie są zwykłe, jednojezdniowe Ski, a gdzie "autostradowe". Na początek zrobię połączenie Gdańsk - Warszawa.
aharvey (2015-07-20 09:42:32+00:00): Hey did you mean to remove the highway=tertiary or the lcn=yes? Because your comment indicates the latter but you actually did the former.
inas (2015-07-20 09:51:09+00:00): Oops.  Yes.  Looks like you've fixed it up?
aharvey (2015-07-20 10:01:24+00:00): Nope, I haven't fixed it. I did pass a footway through the street, so I did make an edit after you, but didn't touch the tags. Are you right to correct?
inas (2015-07-20 11:29:28+00:00): yep.  done.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-09 11:44:48+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3474297493 is in the middle of the sea - how was this place "automatically created"?
Mobile Service (2015-04-24 01:41:04+00:00): Yes
Mateusz Konieczny (2016-11-03 14:20:14+00:00): Asfalt na drodze dla rowerów (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30444031) to teraz robią, a nie rok temu. Wtedy asflat był tylko bezpośrednio przy rondzie.
Mateusz Konieczny (2016-11-03 14:20:28+00:00): link miał być do https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247977710#map=19/50.06762/19.95527
woodpeck (2015-04-24 08:32:04+00:00): Hello StephenDavis, as you probably know all data imports to OSM are subject to our import guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) which include, among other things, that a public discussion is required before the import. I cannot immediately see the discussion of your LINZ import. Please explain.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-24 09:57:45+00:00): The source tag ideally should point to the discussion.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-24 09:59:53+00:00): And tags like LINZ:dataset=mainland are not tags useful to OSM mappers or consumers.  Discussion about tags like that would be the result of creating an import plan in advance, and showing it around.
StephenDavis (2015-04-27 22:19:42+00:00): Hi, woodpeck and Bryce: this is part of the very long-running LINZ import, which you can see on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/LINZ, tracked on linz2osm.openstreetmap.org.nz. See also the discussion on the nzopengis mailing list https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/nzopengis which is the NZ equivalent of OSM country-specific talk lists.
StephenDavis (2015-04-27 22:23:32+00:00): Bryce:

These tags are there to allow us to automatically update these features when the source data changes, or we change the tagging formula. The format was discussed when we began the LINZ import.

These tags are not intended to be maintained in OSM. Once other mappers start to touch the data, it's fine if the tags go missing: if other people want to update the data by hand that's much better than an semi-automatic update (they are still verified by hand) done through LINZ2OSM.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-28 03:56:34+00:00): Could that be collapsed down to a single key?

LINZ:ref=mainland-exotic_poly-123128379

The current one does not have a primary key or object reference to the LINZ dataset.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-28 03:56:52+00:00): Make that "ref:LINZ"
StephenDavis (2015-04-28 04:02:58+00:00): > Could that be collapsed down to a single key?

In principle, sure.

It was kept as separate tags to make it easier to query. If you feel strongly about changing the existing scheme, though, I suggest you start a discussion on nzopengis, rather than commenting on a changeset.
StephenDavis (2015-04-28 04:04:12+00:00): Bear in mind that we did a lot of discussion during the original proposal about how to tag. Robin Paulson was heavily involved in that.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-28 04:07:06+00:00): My comments are independent of  Robin Paulson's. I'm a database person, and have done OSM imports (including controversial ones).  I'm not an enemy of imports, but an advocate for good ones.
StephenDavis (2015-04-28 04:48:29+00:00): Fair enough. There's a lot of background to this, is what I'm saying. This is not a new import, in fact it's been in progress for several years. If you've got things to say about the LINZ import in general, it'd be best to take them to nzopengis and/or the imports list.
myfanwy (2015-05-19 02:40:14+00:00): This is not part of the LINZ import, it is completely separate and significantly different. LINZ is a central government department which handles land packets, this appears to be (correct me if I'm wrong), building outlines, from Auckland Council.
StephenDavis (2015-05-20 02:40:56+00:00): Hi Robin, as we discussed on nzopengis, these data sets from AC and WCC are available under the same terms, and provide a more comprehensive set of the same data. If you want to discuss it further, please do so on osm-import or nzopengis, rather than a random changeset.

On another note, I'm between jobs at the moment, and don't have a huge amount of time for OSM at present. I'm not continuing with any LINZ2OSM merges for the time being, I'll let you know when I start again if you want.

I also think it might be a good idea for a meetup sometime: other than Glen, I haven't seen much of the NZ OSM community in ages. It might also be about time to discuss LINZ2OSM and where it's going.
R0bst3r (2015-12-08 09:04:20+00:00): Just asking, what is the tag 175=57 used for? See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/da8.
Supaplex (2015-04-24 06:52:00+00:00): 不知道戰備道能不能加tag表示能起降飛機?
GerdP (2015-11-13 18:40:25+00:00): please review:
I've changed "20 kph" to "20 kmh" and 
40ton to "40 t"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35290719
keithonearth (2017-07-22 18:10:26+00:00): I see that this edit also added a `maxspeed=30` tag to at least one alley. This surprises me, because the default maxspeed in BC for alleys is 20km/h. What is the source 30km/h speed?
MelioraCogito (2017-08-01 23:19:36+00:00): I don't recall adding any speed tags to any of the edits (considering these were made over two years ago).
Feel free to correct them.
Hjart (2015-04-30 08:57:59+00:00): Hvad tegner du efter, Geodatastyrelsens eller Bings fotos?
Krymmel (2015-04-30 17:11:50+00:00): Det tænkte jeg ikke over men et kig i editoren har vist mig at jeg brugte Bings.

Er det fordi Geodatastyrelsens luftfoto er bedre/mere korrekte?
Krymmel (2015-04-30 17:14:59+00:00): Jeg kan se de ikke oplignet helt ens.
Hjart (2015-04-30 18:07:16+00:00): Geodatastyrelsens fotos er generelt mere akkurate end Bings og at dømme efter gps- og Strava-spor er det også tilfældet her. 

Jeg har iøvrigt rykket lidt ved nogen af de bygninger du har tegnet, så de passer med Geodatastyrelsens fotos :)
Krymmel (2015-04-30 18:34:53+00:00): Fint, så må jeg gennemgå resten af mine indtegninger og få dem rettet op.
Tak for tippet.
PT-53 (2016-12-21 09:36:06+00:00): Hallo  pretzel12,
Du hast am "Kreuzberg" den tag natural=peak gelöscht. keep right zeigt jetzt diese Fehlermeldung an:
http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=94&error=81133951

Wenn es kein "Berg" ist, was ist es dann ?
Ergänzst Du den Node noch entsprechend ?

Grüße aus dem Landkreis Biberach
pretzel12 (2016-12-29 15:56:13+00:00): Habe den tag wieder hinzugefügt, und den "Gipfel" mit der Kreuz und der Sitzbank zusammengeführt.

Hatte den tag gelöscht, da es kein "richtiger Berg" ist, aber in lokalen Printmedien habe ich doch derartige Bezeichnungen gefunden, deshalb jetzt wieder ein Gipfel.

Vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
Bob (2015-04-25 17:17:29+00:00): Die B 54 wurde vor ca. 1,5 Jahren zur L 173 und L 729 abgestuft (VÖ im Amtsblatt der BezReg Arnsberg). Gab es etwa wieder eine Heraufstufung zur Bundesstraße bzw. hat gegen die Abstufung der neue Baulastträger erfolgreich den Rechtsweg beschritten?
Hjart (2015-04-25 06:34:56+00:00): Jeg har reverteret denne ændring eftersom kirken var på kortet i forvejen
choess (2015-11-09 21:52:10+00:00): I see you have changed many "service=spur" to "service=yard". In my opinion, this tag should only be applied to tracks in railroad yards, where many tracks are parallel, and not to single tracks leading to individual industries. I am changing the tag back as I make fixes  to individual spurs.
flierfy (2026-03-15 17:22:23+00:00): I applied the current tagging scheme. And this scheme wants tracks, which are controlled by dwarf signals, to be tagged service= yard. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:usage
choess (2026-03-22 16:41:02+00:00): I think there has been a misunderstanding. The distinction in usage=* that you are pointing to is between service=yard (controlled by low-speed signals) and service=siding (controlled by high-speed signals). This does not change the fact that tracks leading to a single industry should be service=spur. See the first link in my original comment.
will_p (2015-04-24 11:34:17+00:00): I have concerns about your recent edits in West Bridgford (Loughbough Road/Radcliffe Road junction):

1. You have left behind several broken turn restrictions. These all need fixing.

2. You have removed the intersecting nodes from overlapping highways. Highways should never  overlap (without a joining node) unless they are on different levels.

Basically, you have re-modelled the junction in a non-standard way. Turn restrictions are the way routing on complex junctions is handled. Other mappers have spent time accurately adding turn restrictions and you appear to have ignored them.

I will give you time to fix these issues, but I do so myself in a day or two if necessary.

See:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Nakaner (2015-04-26 17:56:16+00:00): Nach § 50 Abs. 4 BOStrab darf an Bahnsteigen ohne Halt nur mit maximal 40 km/h vorbeigefahren werden (auch wenn das nicht durch Langsamfahrsignale gekennzeichnet ist). http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/strabbo_1987/__50.html Kannst du das bitte beim Mappen berücksichtigen? Danke.
dachefte (2015-04-27 07:22:29+00:00): Das ist berücksichtigt. Die 40 km/h gelten eben ausdrücklich nur, wenn zwei Voraussetzungen vorliegen: 1. für die "Vorbeifahrt" und 2. "ohne Halt". Sobald gehalten wird (also der Normalfall), darf vorher und nachher auch an den Bahnsteigen schneller ein-/ausgefahren werden.
Die Regelung dient m.W. dazu, möglicherweise wartende Fahrgäste vor einer mit 80+ km/h vollkommen unerwartet, unplanmäßig und unangekündigt vorbeifliegenden Betriebsfahrt zu schützen.
Sollte ich da falsch liegen, korrigiere mich bitte.
naoliv (2015-06-28 00:08:54+00:00): João, mais cuidado com as suas edições.
Você deformou o  traçado de alguns locais.
joaocorityac (2015-06-28 01:44:08+00:00): Oi. Eu moro na cidade e sei exatamente as alterações que solicitei. Já tenho instruções da secretaria de cultura e turismo para editar alguns locais, pois confundem buscas e localização de ruas e locais nos mapas.
O mesmo procedimento estou fazendo no google maps.
Em breve teremos informações mais detalhadas para poder inserir no mapa.
Obrigado
naoliv (2015-06-28 01:51:06+00:00): Mas nessa sua edição você apagou um trecho de uma rotatória e deformou alguns caminhos. É sobre isso que eu estava falando.
É interessante que você adiciona notas em suas edições, para que os outros mapeadores entendam. Isso se torna mais importante se você atualizar alguma informação que difere do Bing (por exemplo, uma rua que está diferente do que é visto nas imagens do Bing).
Abraço!
GerdP (2015-11-23 10:17:54+00:00): Hi there!
I found the tag surface=70 on this residential road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48915890
The way starts paved and ends as narrow footway (according to Bing),
so I also don't think that maxspeed=70 is
plausible here. What was meant?
tomasy (2015-11-23 17:46:46+00:00): I do not remember it was seven months ago. But if you look at https://nvdb2012.trafikverket.se/SeTransportnatverket# they say the maxspeed is 70.
GerdP (2015-11-23 18:16:05+00:00): Thanks for the feedback.
When you say that maxspeed=70 is plausible please change it to that.
tyr_asd (2015-04-26 09:37:12+00:00): Ciao labricot! Ho revocato questa tua "prova": In OpenStreetMap noi mettiamo solo dati verificabili. ;-)
trigpoint (2017-03-05 19:40:11+00:00): Hi, I got some odd instructions from maps.me  for this roundabout today. Now I am home and able to check I see that for some strange reason you removed the roundabout tags and replaced it with oneway. Why?
Dyserth (2017-03-07 01:51:43+00:00): If I remember correctly at some point iD was not showing roundabouts as oneway unless they were tagged as such. I did change a few tags to reflect this as clearly roundabouts are not two-way flows but clearly this flaw in the editor has now been rectified. However because that edit was done 2 years ago I cannot be sure. Hope this reason is not too strange for you.
andrewsh (2015-04-24 13:40:01+00:00): Teh Wow.
trolleway (2015-04-24 13:55:41+00:00): Солсбері
woodpeck (2015-04-24 14:35:00+00:00): What is the source of these names? For example, Russian names of "Swadlincote" or "Great Dunmow"? Is there any evidence of these places actually having a name in Russian, or are these just transliterations?
dudka (2015-04-24 14:38:08+00:00): This should be interesting discussion :D
See the previous one.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2014-August/thread.html#16294
Komяpa (2015-04-24 14:46:35+00:00): Hello,

to find russian names for places, I googled for English place names plus "достопримечательности", "погода" or some other russian word. It shows a lot of pages where the name is used, and some of them have russian version.

see for example 
https://www.google.by/search?q=Swadlincote+%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BF%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8&safe=off&es_sm=93&biw=1920&bih=908&ei=blU6VbH5O8uqswGpp4CIBQ&start=10&sa=N

https://www.google.by/search?q=Great+Dunmow+%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0&oq=Great+Dunmow+%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B0&aqs=chrome.0.69i59.1721j0j7&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=93&ie=UTF-8

If I had doubts and had to choose between different options, I googled for both and compared usage.

Is that enough evidence?
woodpeck (2015-04-24 14:59:16+00:00): Frankly, no - is *any* of these web sites more than a database of transliterated place names? I saw hotel listings, tour operators, and weather pages, all obviously using a generic catalogue of transliterated place names. These sites would generate a place page for any remote village that has a hotel or a weather station. Just because you can write a name in the cyrillic alphabet doesn't mean the place *has* that name. Actual humans have to know the place by that name for that to be the case.
tyr_asd (2015-04-26 09:36:00+00:00): Ciao! Perché stai disegnando strade sopra quelle già esistenti? (per esempio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340272622 sopra https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23446895). Se vuoi correggere nomi etc, puoi semplicemente modificare le vie già esistenti. :)
FraukeLeo (2020-11-30 18:08:28+00:00): Hallo, ich hab https://openstreetmap.org/relation/4828129 (von der K 242 auf die B 247) entfernt. Man darf da links abbiegen, siehe https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/07EK0FHWuspmRmsuhkGO3A
lks1[konto usunięte] (2015-04-24 15:44:34+00:00): Hej, w OSM obowiązuje zasada "One feature, one OSM element": http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:One_feature,_one_OSM_element Czyli jeśli mamy węzeł otagowany jako stacja paliw (amenity=fuel) to nie powinno się dodawać takich tagów do obszaru i odwrotnie.  Wiem, że chcesz dobrze, ale w tej chwili mamy w bazie danych 2 stacje w tym miejscu, chociaż w rzeczywistości jest jedna.
Zibi-importy (2015-05-23 00:20:03+00:00): Dlaczego sklejasz obszary z drogami? 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19518
plguedes (2015-11-23 22:07:10+00:00): Certeza que é proibido bicicleta no túnel? Não há nenhuma sinalização indicando isso na Real da Torre antes de entrar nele.
will_p (2015-04-24 13:45:09+00:00): I see you are continuing to make junction simplification edits. These changes go against the consensus of the community

Please see my concerns here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30449895

Additionally, I see you are now creating multiple ways when there is no physical separation in the road - we do not map individual road lanes in this way.

OSM does not just exist for your router, it is used for a wide variety of purposes including printed maps - your changes seem to ignore this fact.

I encourage you to discuss your changes before making further edits.
maraf24 (2015-04-24 15:15:50+00:00): Numer domu to za mało. Potrzebna jest miejscowość, dobrze dodać kod pocztowy.
ACarlotti (2019-09-25 22:27:43+00:00): There are a number of areas east of Hardwick that you have tagged as barrier=hedge and landuse=farmland. There are a couple of issues with this. Firstly, the use of a 'landuse' tag suggests that this way should be treated as an area, with the result that users of the data might incorrectly assume the whole field is a hedge (see e.g. the default renderer on openstreetmap.org at zoom levels 16 and above). Secondly, by tagging this on multiple adjoining fields (setting aside the area issue), you are effectively mapping the same hedge multiple times.
I'm wondering if you might be able to resolve these tagging issues - my suggestion would be to remove barrier=hedge from the fields and tag the hedges on separate non-overlapping (and probably shorter) ways.
I realise this issue partly predates your changeset (where the fields were tagged as fences instead of hedges). However, as the last person to have mapped these fields, and since I've never visited them myself, you are probably better placed than me to work out how to tag sections of the hedge appropriately (including knowing whether there should be any gaps in the hedges).
Andy_W (2019-09-27 19:09:04+00:00): I see the problem but am not convinced that I am the source ... not something I would knowingly do.  As a start I have removed all the barrier tags added to landuse tags in this area.  A check on the history of one of these problem areas suggests that user smb101 is the source : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337415057/history#map=16/52.2147/0.0271
ACarlotti (2019-09-28 05:46:33+00:00): I agree that you aren't the original source; however, all the ones I'd noticed where ones where you'd changed the tag barrier=fence to barrier=hedge, without noticing the issue.
Loris Mich (2015-04-24 14:51:45+00:00): Segnalo noleggio di sci e biciclette
neiljp (2015-04-24 15:31:00+00:00): Thanks for your edit! In future it would be useful to add a description of your changes in the top-left box, before saving, so that others (and yourself in future) have an idea of the change you have made (and perhaps why).

Thanks!
Swen Wacker (2015-04-24 16:58:48+00:00): Hallo wendenmicha,

toll, dass Du Dich bei openstreetmap engagiert. Für Briefkästen gibt es bestimmte Regeln, wie man sie "mappen" sollte, damit sie später auf Kartenauch als solche zu finden sind: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpost_box. Vielleicht magst Du mit Deiner Ortskenntnis den Briefkasten noch weiter verbessern. 
Frag ruhig, wenn was unklar ist.

Danke

Swen
no more nyampire (2015-04-24 20:12:00+00:00): You must know what you are doing.
Sie müssen wissen, was Sie tun.
Vous devez savoir ce que vous faites.
Dovete sapere che cosa si sta facendo.
Usted debe saber lo que está haciendo.
Você deve saber o que está fazendo.
Вы должны знать, что вы делаете.
あなたは何をしているかを知っている必要があります。
당신은 당신이 무엇을하고 있는지 알고 있어야합니다.
你必须知道你在做什么。
nyampire (2015-04-25 04:05:34+00:00): I'm exactory aware of my work.
This deletion is a part of KSJ2 administrative boundary import.
Described in following page.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Japan_KSJ2_Import/Administrative_district_2014

If there are existing administrative relation, I'm using those relations. So I guess the effects to query operations are minimal.

If your comment means "Do not work import related work with normal account. Or do not attach import related comment", I'll shift those works from the dedicated account completely.

Any feedback are welcome.
no more nyampire (2015-05-02 23:02:59+00:00): You are not aware of the fact that you have destroyed many tags, geometries and connections, the results of manual edits. Or you ignore and hide it intentionally. In either case, you are incompetent for editing in such scale.
Sie sind nicht der Tatsache bewusst, dass Sie viele Tags, Geometrien und Verbindungen, die Ergebnisse der manuellen Bearbeitung zerstört. Oder Sie ignorieren und verstecken sie absichtlich. In jedem Fall sind Sie unfähig zur Bearbeitung in einem solchen Maßstab.
Vous n'êtes pas au courant du fait que vous avez détruit de nombreux tags, des géométries et des connexions, les résultats des vérifications manuelles. Ou vous ignorez et cacher intentionnellement. Dans les deux cas, vous êtes incompétent pour modification dans telle échelle.
Non siete a conoscenza del fatto che hai distrutto molti tag, geometrie e le connessioni, i risultati delle modifiche manuali. O si ignora e nascondere intenzionalmente. In entrambi i casi, si è incompetente per la modifica in tale scala.
Usted no es consciente del hecho de que ha destruido muchas etiquetas, geometrías y conexiones, los resultados de ediciones manuales. O usted no hace caso y ocultar intencionalmente. En cualquier caso, usted es incompetente para la edición de tal escala.
Você não está ciente do fato de que você destruiu muitas tags, geometrias e conexões, os resultados das edições manuais. Ou você ignorar e escondê-lo intencionalmente. Em ambos os casos, você é incompetente para editar em tal escala.
Вы не в курсе о том, что вы уничтожили много тегов, геометрии и соединений, результаты ручного редактирования. Или вы игнорируете и скрыть это намеренно. В любом случае, вы некомпетентны для редактирования в таком масштабе.
あなたは多くのタグ、形状および接続、手動で編集した結果を破壊しているという事実を認識していません。それとも無視して、意図的にそれを隠します。いずれの場合も、あなたはこのような規模での編集のために無能です。
당신은 당신이 많은 태그, 형상 및 연결, 수동 편집의 결과를 파괴 사실을 인식하지 못합니다. 아니면 무시하고 의도적으로 숨 깁니다. 각각의 경우에, 당신은 규모에 편집 무능이다.
你不知道你已经摧毁了许多标签，几何形状和连接，手动编辑的结果的事实。或者你忽视和故意隐瞒。在这两种情况下，你无能用于编辑在这样的规模。
nyampire (2015-05-11 16:10:10+00:00): OK. We should improve procedure for edit, if there are any problems.
Please indicate the problems more detailed?
I need more clues, suggestions with examples.
(i.e. handling of coastline/ways on sea, deleting useful XXXX tags.)

We can not hide every edits on OSM.

I guess, at least, some tags (esp. note:ja, note:en, source_ref on NODE) are useless and can delete.
They were commented in talk-ja as well.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-24 16:36:25+00:00): First attempt at migrating dump station tagging without loosing information or making up information.
rene78 (2025-08-19 08:11:35+00:00): Is there really a ferry here?
naoliv (2015-04-24 17:26:21+00:00): LucFreitas, legal que você está ajudando.
Além de colocar nome de rua e outras informações, também é muito útil os prédios da área que você está trabalhando.
ViriatoLusitano (2015-05-14 02:33:21+00:00): A estrada está mesmo bloqueada neste segmento?
tomhukins (2015-10-02 16:51:13+00:00): I don't think there's a cafe here, just the pavement.  Did you intend to add "wheelchair: yes" to the existing Costa Coffee at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2048134010 instead?
tomhukins (2015-10-22 09:41:46+00:00): I have deleted the non-existent cafe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34795649