piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2021-11-22 08:19:43+00:00): PS:
An diesen Sgtraßenabschnitten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31525193/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25964054/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28559855/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28559856/history
ist noch eine Sperre mit
access=no
eingetragen. Das müßte dann ja auch überholt sein.

Und diese Straße
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234275254/history
wird wohl nur eine Baustellenstraße gewesen sein und jetzt nicht mehr existieren.
Ich hoffe ich habe jetzt nichts mehr übersehen. 
Sorry und Grüße
eggie (2021-11-19 10:11:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Scherp gezien.. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
wielandb (2021-11-21 00:31:45+00:00): Es wäre cool, wenn bei solchen Korrekturen die Chronik erhalten werden würde. (Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik ) z.B. bei Hnr. 14

Da dies nicht getan wurde, sind hier leider einige Daten über die Häuser gelöscht wurden, die ich erst einen Tag vorher gesammelt hatte. :(
Rhoon (2021-11-23 06:09:50+00:00): Einverstanden. Sorry :/
fayor (2021-11-19 16:25:32+00:00): Sei pregato di non intervenire con modifiche di tale portata con prese di posizione nette (specialmente in materie che non hanno una connotazione precisa), senza prima tentare una discussione con i mappatori locali, ed eventualmente porre la questione in mailing list o alti canali.
Maptapper (2021-11-19 12:11:19+00:00): I think this is wrong, motor vehicles share the road with trams. There are even on street parkign spaces at some points

http://www.rochdale.gov.uk/parking-roads-and-transport/Pages/drake-street-parking.aspx
SK53 (2021-11-19 12:47:06+00:00): There are plenty of Geograph photos showing the stretch from South Parade to Water Street is bus only, also http://rochdaleonline.co.uk/news-features/2/news-headlines/104568/drivers-caught-on-camera-in-tram-only-zones. Not sure I got this far when I surveyed in 2017
Maptapper (2021-11-19 12:59:10+00:00): Yes, apologies for my doubts. Looks like you are spot on!
SK53 (2021-11-19 13:24:54+00:00): Just checked my images & there is definitely a no right turn sign at the lights on South Parade. There is other detail which I can't see, but am assuming it's "Except Buses". Have removed the access=no on the via point.
fayor (2021-11-19 16:25:34+00:00): Sei pregato di non intervenire con modifiche di tale portata con prese di posizione nette (specialmente in materie che non hanno una connotazione precisa), senza prima tentare una discussione con i mappatori locali, ed eventualmente porre la questione in mailing list o alti canali.
fedc (2021-11-19 16:44:29+00:00): E tu sei pregato di non usare questi toni.
Non si capisce perché queste materie non dovrebbero avere una connotazione precisa.
eggie (2021-11-19 10:40:19+00:00): Tip  name=Indoor pool  zou je hier kunnen gebruiken als het de naam van het zwembad is.  Maar is dat zo?

Hier nog wat leesvoer..
Good practice    

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice 

En dan m.n.  over het gebruiken van de name tag.
Dat zit in de categorie name=bankje name=Fietspad

In het begin worden edits gevolgd .. uiteraard om te helpen. 

eggie
Rens Oliemans (2021-12-28 15:44:18+00:00): Dag eggie,
Oops lang druk gehad met studie+kerst. Je hebt gelijk, het zwembad heeft geen naam dus ik heb de tag name weggehaald, zoals beschreven in de wiki-pagina. Dank!

Groet Rens
eggie (2021-12-28 15:56:40+00:00): Top! 😀
habi (2021-11-19 10:24:19+00:00): Das 'Sense' im Changeset-Kommentar ist unnötig :)
Leo Slager (2021-11-22 15:55:46+00:00): Dag Martijn,

entrance=yes is niet fout maar wellicht is entrance=main een betere tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance
Martijn-VR-Gooi en Vechtstreek (2021-11-22 17:54:24+00:00): Ha Leo,
Bedankt voor de feedback.
doen we dat de volgende keer.

m.vr.gr.
Martijn.
Squizie3 (2021-11-19 10:46:00+00:00): correctie: ik bedoelde van trunk naar primary
Squizie3 (2021-11-19 11:11:25+00:00): ik heb ondertussen toch de rest ineens afgewerkt
bxl-forever (2021-11-20 09:34:55+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for editing the map.
I think there were a few problems with the way you handled bus stops and stop position nodes here.  Perhaps it would be adviseable to avoid touching those objects in the future, because they are part of a complicated tagging scheme with several interconnections.
Have a nice day.

Fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114020270
zvenzzon (2021-11-19 10:54:55+00:00): Is there a better tag to describe traffic lights that forces oneway in a specific direction intermittently depending on incomming traffic? traffic_signals=bus_priority is just an approximation...
freeExec (2021-11-22 08:39:19+00:00): На дороге установлен знак "максимальная скорость 20"? Если нет, то и никаких ограничений скорости в данных быть не должно
KVI0n (2021-11-19 11:14:56+00:00): mistake: #mbx_linters_belgium
eggie (2021-11-19 11:43:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2021-11-20 15:41:05+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the new key RFA? (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1dfz)
Wilmer Osario (2021-11-20 20:21:10+00:00): It's a tag-key that I invented to be able to filter this roads in JOSM while working in this area of the city. When I finish detailing the streets in this area, I will remove it. 😅
eggie (2021-11-19 11:51:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. access=no icm met foot=yes en bicycle=yes is echt niet correct.
Dit fietspad is dus verboden toegang?

Een highway cycleway zal echt niet routeren voor auto's.
Wel is het van belang om de fietspaden goed te klasseren. 
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 
Ik zal access=no en je toegevoegde accesstags verwijderen.
De breedte aangeven is natuurlijk prima. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-19 12:01:28+00:00): Tagging aangepast..

Weet jij welke bebording bij deze nieuwe fietspaden horen?  Dan zou je het kunnen aanpassen met bovenstaande info.
Van fietspad Kapelweg heb ik verder een G12a fietspad gemaakt als voorbeeld. 

Mapse,
eggie
Владимир К (2021-12-24 15:39:10+00:00): не надо писать номер дома в название
Владимир К (2021-12-24 15:37:49+00:00): добрый день. заказник отмечается не так, откатываю
freeExec (2021-11-22 08:37:59+00:00): Не нужно вместо официального названия дорог писать их описательные свойства, оно не для этого.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-19 13:19:02+00:00): I've hidden the odd comments that were here (they'd been left by an OSM account on a number of changesets by different people worldwide).
- Andy
(from OSM's Data Working Group)
sreejam (2021-11-22 08:20:07+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for the support.
I really appreciate it.

Regards,
sreejam
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
AlexRiabtsev (2021-11-21 18:49:30+00:00): а  навіщо  ліхтарі видалено?
Sergioni145 (2021-11-22 08:59:34+00:00): По умолчанию, все улицы/переулки города освещены. Данные же "одинокие фонари" размещены хаотично, вносят визуальный "мусор" на карту не добавляя ей информативности.
AlexRiabtsev (2021-11-22 09:04:30+00:00): Сильно ошибаетесь по поводу освщенности по умолчанию. Кроме того, фонари нанесены не «хаотично», а в соответствии с данными кмда. Просьба откатить удаление, иначе это будет расценено, как вандализм с соответствующей жалобой.
Anton Melnichuk (2021-11-22 09:41:16+00:00): приходите в телеграм Чатик ОСМ Украина обсудим, https://t.me/osmUA
Sergioni145 (2021-11-22 10:15:18+00:00): Александр, никогда не откатывал полностью пакет правок, подскажите как это сделать правильно, или исправьте самостоятельно, если уверены, что это будет полезным. Спасибо.
AlexRiabtsev (2021-11-22 11:02:25+00:00): все правки в этих наборах будут отменены. если делали что-то  полезное, то поставьте JOSM и плагин reverter, чтобы откатывать изменения.
tiptracks (2021-11-19 13:33:32+00:00): Hoi Andre, ik zie dat je veel parkeerterreinen toevoegt in Kloosterveen. Top! 
Eén tip: als je voor straatparkeerhavens de tag parking=street_side toevoegt (waar van toepassing natuurlijk) is de rendering subtieler, en wordt het onderscheid met parkeerterreinen duidelijker.

Zie bijv https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9264391628
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Warin61 (2021-11-21 03:52:37+00:00): Hi,
You would have had a warning message about 'self crossing ways'. These should be fixed before uploading. 
Please see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.90375&lat=-41.06388&zoom=12

There are some 5 errors there now, there maybe more as the QA tool sifts through the data to d=find more. 

I have checked 2 of them and in both cases you are the author of the errors. Please fix them.
bdhurkett (2021-11-21 04:48:19+00:00): Thanks for noticing. I fixed lots of validation errors before uploading this and the following changeset, not sure how those slipped through. On a new download JOSM only detects the same five currently showing on Geofabrik, and those are fixed now.

There are still issues in other categories but I want to visit some places in person first for confirmation, or focus on other tasks first. But hopefully the error count will start decreasing again!
Warin61 (2021-11-21 08:09:34+00:00): Thanks. 
I keep an eye on the area errors and the public transport route errors.Started so I can pick up my own errors - usually relations, but I now try to keep the general Australian errors down. Where it is a new mapper I usually fix it myself - we all need time to learn. Where it is a more experienced mapper I tend to let them know of the error, particularly where it is repetitive.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
literan (2021-11-19 14:59:26+00:00): перестаньте, пожалуйста, рисовать произвольные линии без тегов.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-11-19 12:59:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Lijkt me helemaal oke zo. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
❤️‍🔥 (2022-02-28 02:54:08+00:00): Hi, this is not fictional mapping. Please see Maxar Premium Imagery
sheldonelectric (2022-01-20 20:35:20+00:00): This is a fake name.
I see your previous edits are fake viewpoints.
You're being reported for vandalism.
SHARCRASH (2021-11-22 16:26:56+00:00): Hi! Please be careful with your contributions, you displaced this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5522385397
SomeoneElse (2021-11-19 20:53:21+00:00): Hello,
You've deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298306425/history here - do you know where the England Coast Path goes to get past the former Steetley site?
Best Regards,
Andy
Joe E (2021-11-22 09:41:01+00:00): I deleted a clearly wrong way; it went through, at least, two fences.  I don't know where the ECP goes, I'm not sure it has been signposted yet.   I suspect it goes behind the houses now where there is a path. It will need a survey.
J
SomeoneElse (2021-11-22 11:10:19+00:00): Great - thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
LuxuryCoop (2021-12-04 00:08:29+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
fabiotofy (2021-11-20 04:53:19+00:00): Ciao, la posizione del civico 546 non sembra essere collocato alle giuste coordinate. Guarda quelle di riferimento di EAGLE: http://irdat.regione.fvg.it/WebGIS/prints/repc43340fbeb839233/repc43340fbeb839233.pdf
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113990843
fabiotofy (2021-11-20 04:56:02+00:00): Ciao, quello che hai mappato come civico 27 di Campo Sacro EAGLE lo mette 37. In effetti, con la aggiunta del tuo 27, adesso abbiamo un doppione. Vedi mappa: http://irdat.regione.fvg.it/WebGIS/prints/rep22b4ff820f933c06/rep22b4ff820f933c06.pdf
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113990843
damjang (2021-11-20 20:03:46+00:00): Per il 27->37 hai ragione, ho già corretto. Per il 546 direi di lasciarlo la perché il building (capannone) indicato da EAGLE con il civico è un building secondaria e l'altro dove effettivamente la ditta ha gli uffici ecc. Comunque io i civici li ho solo copiati dal building ad un punto, lasciandoli come erano prima (importazione dai civici fvg di qualche anno fa). Comunque grazie delle segnalazioni. Sai se esiste  un modo in automatico o semi per verificare i civici con osm con quelli EAGLE?
fabiotofy (2021-11-20 20:17:38+00:00): Per la verifica dei civici io o navigo direttamente con EAGLE attivando lo sfondo vettoriale "civici ascoot/non ascoot" e come sfondo raster OSM. Facendo così saltano subito all'occhio le inesattezze. Oppure per un metodo più automatico scarico i civici da eagle in SHP, gli importo sul JOSM ed eseguo una conflaction con lo strumento "FUSIONE". Lì il programma ti evidenzia con un bel elenco colorato se ci sono civici con medesima posizione ma con tag differenti oppure ti segnala se ci sono civici con tag uguali ma con differente posizione. Lavora molto bene fino a 5.000  records... poi va in crisi. Bisogna fare a porzioni di territorio
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113990843
seewäldler (2021-11-19 14:19:47+00:00): Hallo Carlo444!
und willkommen bei OSM. Schön, dass du mithelfen möchtest die Karte zu verbessern, nur sind dir leider bei deinem ersten Beitrag ein paar Fehler unterlaufen, darum habe ich mit meinem changeset 113992115 deine Änderungen wieder zurückgesetzt. 

Dein changeset-Kommentar ist aufgrund seiner Länge abgeschnitten worden, ich stelle mal ein paar Vermutungen an, was du machen wolltest.... Auf der Karte ist die Flugplatzstraße im Bereich zwischen Flugplatzkreisel und etwa Klosterwirt mit Pfeilen auf der Kartendarstellung versehen. Haben dich die irritiert? Nur hier, in dem Stück das durch den Grünstreifen getrennt ist sind die einzelnen Fahrspuren als oneway markiert, das restliche grosse Stück bis zum Flugplatzkreisel ist nicht als Einbahnstraße ausgezeichnet. Das würde bei OSM dann beim highway mit dem Zusatz oneway=yes gekennzeichnet werden. 

Bei der Charlottenstraße ist mir gar nicht klar, was du ändern wolltest, hier war nichts als Einbahnstrasse ausgezeichnet. Was wolltest du mit der zweiten parallelen Fahrspur ausdrücken? Hat das mit dem Spurmapping zwischen Ailinger Straße und ZF-Forum zu tun?

Hier in den Kommentaren kannst du längere Ausführungen schreiben, dann können wir schauen was du vorhattest und dann passend die Karte verbessern.
eggie (2021-11-19 14:09:37+00:00): Tip...
Daan.. Het gebied van je edits is zo groot geworden omdat je een pad verbonden hebt met de landuse=residential van Assen. Probeer plakken te voorkomen.
Je kunt de linker alttoets gebruiken bij intekenen.. dan plakt het niet. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=113991233
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-19 14:15:12+00:00): Het pad heb ik op diverse plaatsen losgemaakt van de landuse=residential en forest.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-19 14:22:27+00:00): Bij de Bosrand loopt ook een grens.. Dat is geen pad.. Dus daar geen paden aan vastmaken. Goed inzoomen. 

Ik heb het pad losgemaakt van de grens Centrum Assen west.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
canfe (2021-11-21 07:17:41+00:00): Il casotto del guardiapesca è... a parallelogramma, mentre altri edifici lì vicino non lo sono.
Chiederei di verificarli. E' capitato un caso simile con un altro mappatore che usava un datum sbagliato. E' meglio controllare subito prima di mappare "storto". Son a disposizione per aiuto e chiarimenti.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
431c57 (2021-12-28 07:31:28+00:00): Hausnummer 40 ist falsch. Es Ist 38.

Historische Anmerkung: 38 war ursprünhlich (vor 40 Jahren) mal für das Grundstück östlich der 36 vorgesehen. Bei Bebauung des damaligen Neubaugebiets wurde allerdings klar, dass das mit der Zufahrtsstraße nicht passen würde. Seitdem ist das „Endhaus“ die 38
Ropino (2021-12-28 11:44:56+00:00): Hallo,
danke für die Info und fürs Korrigieren.
DD1GJ (2021-11-20 12:41:53+00:00): Hallo erase21,

ich habe alle Löschungen rückgängig gemacht, da sie teilweise nicht der Realität entsprachen bzw. sogar Schäden an anderen Objekten verursachten. Wir spielen bei OSM mit "offenen Karten".  D.h. solche frisch angelegten Accounts, welche unter dem Deckmantel eines Pseudonyms nur löschen, werden unter Vandalismus eingestuft und im Wiederholungsfall gesperrt.

Sollten sich illegale Trampelpfade in einem Naturschutzgebiet befinden, dann verwenden wir den Lebenszyklus, um sie mit abandoned:highway unsichtbar zu machen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Wenn es sich um allgemein zugänglichen Wald nach dem LWaldG handelt und die Pfade weniger als 2 Meter breit sind, dann kann das Radverbot mit bicycle= no angegeben werden.

Bei Bearbeitungen durch eine Bohörde, Firma oder sonstige Organisation werden eine Kennzeichnung des verwendeten Accounts und die Angabe einer offiziellen Kontaktmöglichkeit erwartet, Beispiel:https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/UNB_DN_LG

Allgemeine Hinweise zu OSM stehen unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Sandal man (2021-11-20 20:04:24+00:00): Hallo, je bent hier de tags vergeten en welke rivier oversteek het is.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004373217
Gr Jan
Sandal man (2021-11-25 12:00:38+00:00): Ik heb het zelf maar aangepast omdat er geen reactie komt.
opendcc (2021-12-27 08:12:54+00:00): bei construction geht gar nix, auch kein Radler. Ich denke motor_vehicle=no wäre besser.
geow (2021-12-27 09:30:07+00:00): Danke Wolfgang, war mir nicht bewusst, dass brouter und komoot die Ausnahme für foot/bicycle nicht beachten. Immerhin schafft das https://cycle.travel/map

Guten Rutsch
Klaus
pluton_od (2021-11-21 17:18:01+00:00): Привет, skarbaleksandr.
В ваших добавленных точках есть некорректные значения тега `shop`. Они должны быть `pawnbroker` вместо `shop = pawnbroker`. Не могли бы вы исправить их, пожалуйста?
Спасибо.
wireguy (2021-11-23 19:27:43+00:00): this change has broken the relation "town of harrison"  relation 3307289

please correct
charl3s (2021-11-19 20:10:58+00:00): Przestań mi tu mapę wandalizować
maraf24 (2021-11-19 22:02:29+00:00): Dlaczego akurat środkową ścieżkę na pedestrian? Tę jedną akurat nieutwardzoną? :)
maraf24 (2021-11-19 22:04:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358969112
W tym miejscu nie ma drogi rowerowej. To jest już C13-C16.
Poprawiłem (2025-08-02 14:27:14+00:00): co do fixme, to brak jest oznaczeń "Park Staromiejski" lub "Park Mikołaja Kopernika" w terenie, oprócz zagadkowego drogowskazu ze zdjęcia w 'source:image'
pavvv (2025-08-02 15:26:58+00:00): Nie wiem po co komentujesz akurat pod tą zmianą, która nic dotyczącego nazwy parku nie ruszała. Źródło nazwy "Park Staromiejski" masz w wersji https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128812093/history/17 a możesz historię zmian zobaczyć pod https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128812093/history
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:39:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
OutX (2021-11-19 15:00:49+00:00): eigentlich wollte ich noch Bilder dazu hochladen, hat aber leider nicht geklappt.
user_2066394 (2021-11-22 11:23:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004386261
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306913444
Beide Gebäude haben jetzt Hausnummer 23
user_2066394 (2021-11-22 11:26:13+00:00): Die 25 vermutllich auch Oberdorfer Straße?
user_12500175 (2021-11-22 13:30:31+00:00): da wollte ich nochmal nachfragen ob Karl-Steinhauser oder Oberdorfer Straße