piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
luiswoo (2016-12-04 09:23:28+00:00): точку нужно было делать как офис (уже сделано)
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:41:47+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
jaap de vries (2016-12-13 08:27:31+00:00): Zou je de postcode even op de juiste wijze willen veranderen?
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 20:22:06+00:00): Die shop stond al op de kaart. Ik heb je bijdrage weer verwijderd. 
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:42:18+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-22 20:17:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44597273 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some objects based on google.cn sourced data in China
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:41:55+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:42:10+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
MrMoehritz (2021-05-25 10:46:33+00:00): How did you create an empty changeset :-) ?
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:42:29+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
manoharuss (2017-02-20 06:26:10+00:00): Hi jrome003,

Observed that you have contributed a good deal for the relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4614049. This relation is not closed and therefore incomplete. You might have knowledge of this place. May I request for an update to the relation.

Thanks!

Best,

Manohar
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:42:37+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:42:50+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:43:06+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:42:59+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
PT-53 (2017-01-31 09:19:26+00:00): Hallo bergfrei,
Du hast diesen Weg von track auf service geändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39120771#map=18/48.23475/9.70747  Da dieses Wegstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219446528#map=19/48.23432/9.70615 aber immer noch als track eingetragen ist, wird im OSM-Inspector, View Routing jetzt eine Fehlermeldung angezeigt: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.70424&lat=48.23744&zoom=16&opacity=0.34
Du hast den service-way mit drive-through für Durchfahrtstraßen von Schnellrestaurants deklariert. Das war wohl ein Versehen ?
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße
frosm (2020-11-18 13:59:58+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4537574861
vous avez créé 2 batiments només Bazin
mais à l'endroit en question, 4 ans + tard, l'imagerie sat ne montre pas de nouveau batiment. qu'est-ce que c'est ?
etienne_lc53 (2020-11-18 16:50:12+00:00): Bonjour, si je me souviens bien, je n'avais pas trouvé de catégorie correspondant à l'entreprise (je crois d'agroalimentaire) ne connaissant pas beaucoup osm à l'époque, je ne sais pas si l'entreprise existe encore, je n'habite plus la commune. Désolé si j'ai fait une erreur sur la carte.
frosm (2020-11-18 16:52:36+00:00): pas de soucis, n'hésitez pas à ajouter une description quand vous n'êtes pas certain, cela aide beaucoup le suivant à comprendre :)
si vous le souhaittez, je vous laisse corriger, sinon je m'en chargerai.
merci pour votre retour et bonne continuation
frosm (2020-11-19 10:39:57+00:00): j'ai fais la modification.
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:43:26+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
letihu (2017-02-03 10:17:52+00:00): Hallo,
building entrance ist veraltet.
Verwende doch in Zukunft bitte
entrance yes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4537582415/history#map=19/53.60853/10.07322&layers=N
Ich wünsche dir noch viel Spaß bei OSM, und lass dich bitte von meinem Hinweis nicht entmutigen
jaap de vries (2016-12-13 08:25:24+00:00): Wil je de originele website hier vermelden, dus niet een website voor je i phone 7 .
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:43:16+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-07-30 00:13:41+00:00): What is the meaning of r=yes?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 11:36:06+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456199532/history has r=yes key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:20:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435265 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44155958 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:19:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435260 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44156030 because there was a problem with licence of data use
romanh (2016-12-11 19:39:58+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur, habe es im Vespucci eingetragen und vergessen den Tag zu korrigieren.
Gruss Roman
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:18:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435250 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44156249 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:18:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435243 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44156316 because there was a problem with licence of data use
iran map 28 (2017-05-27 18:43:18+00:00): بلوار 32 متری مطهری هست
stephankn (2017-03-19 12:49:09+00:00): please only put Thai script names in name:th. Use a proper editor if your software can't handle this.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:17:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435236 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44156438 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435234 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44156446 because there was a problem with licence of data use
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:43:42+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:43:51+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
Osm1980 (2016-12-06 14:20:06+00:00): تگ نیم رو اشتباه وارد کردید!
Commodoortje (2016-12-05 19:01:46+00:00): John,

highway=rest_area is geen (gewone) parkeerplaats. Ik heb inmiddels deze situatie aangepast adv de door jou geplaatste note.
.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:17:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435199 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44156788 because there was a problem with licence of data use
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:43:59+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
joneppie (2016-12-04 12:43:46+00:00): Falsche Bezeichnung: Parkplätze eingefügt
Luuuddooo (2016-12-04 17:55:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne comprends pas votre modification. Pourquoi avez vous remplacé l'adresse 80 par l'adresse 82 ? Vous avez gardé le tag source=cadastre mais d'après le cadastre c'est bien l'adresse 80 ici. L'adresse 82 existait déjà, avec votre modification elle est en double et il n'y a plus l'adresse 80 dans OSM. Si on regarde l'emplacement de la note n°768188 le restaurant serait bien à côté du vrai n°82 ce qui me parait plus cohérent.

Ludo.
homer__simpsons (2016-12-04 18:40:17+00:00): Effectivement, j'ai appliqué les tags au mouvais nœud, merci de m'avoir prévenu. Bonne continuation.
BCNorwich (2016-12-10 12:50:22+00:00): Removed some self intersecting area outlines for you.
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:43:33+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:15:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435170 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44157491 because there was a problem with licence of data use
EugenyN (2016-12-05 13:54:57+00:00): спасибо за исправление. нужно ещё переименовать остановку с другой стороны и точки остановки: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1731407367 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1731407366 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1129441489
EugenyN (2016-12-22 10:19:44+00:00): исправил
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:12:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435166 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44157579 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:12:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435146 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44158017 because there was a problem with licence of data use
Alecs01 (2016-12-06 20:17:04+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! intendevi dire la linea z218 (almeno così si chiamava in OSM) dal San Gerardo a Sesto FS? qualche tratto è rimasto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821190 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821191 non è molto pratico fare modifiche di questo tipo con Potlatch, se scarichi invece JOSM, dopo averci preso la mano, è molto più pratico per lavorare con oggetti complessi come questi (es. una linea di autobus soppressa la cancelli in un colpo solo, senza doverla togliere da ogni tratto di strada che percorre uno per volta). ps a Lissone comunque ci sono due tratti di via Cappuccina sovrapposti, poi correggo. Ciao!
mondotpl (2016-12-17 14:43:12+00:00): Ciao, ho tolto sia la z218 che la z266. Con Josm non sono ancora riuscito a capire come funziona...appena ho tempo di metterci testa proverò! Ciao
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-04 17:32:36+00:00): Hi ZakariaMKL, why did you delete the roundabout and residential in this changeset? Based on the used Bing aerial imagery or a local field survey? I think the Bing images are outdated ...

MapPosition: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44158158#map=18/32.98974/-7.62231
Achavi: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44158158
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:10:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435133 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44158203 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:09:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435132 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44158351 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:09:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435103 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44158531 because there was a problem with licence of data use
GerdP (2017-08-25 05:32:58+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed that you changed some highways to "unclassified link"
Please don't do that. See also this discussion in the tagging list:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Undiscussed-edits-removing-lesser-used-highway-tags-td5859298.html#a5859559
mapmaker1559 (2017-08-25 14:57:42+00:00): Hi GerdP!  As you may see, this changeset was from 9 months ago, and another user has already told me that "unclassifed links" aren't valid, so I've stopped using that tag.  :)
trigpoint (2016-12-04 17:41:40+00:00): Hi, these artworks look a bit odd. Please can you explain?
mapping man (2016-12-04 18:59:30+00:00): There are 7 (i could only find 6) artworks located along the cycle path as you enter Winslow.  

Some more info here
http://www.rogerperkins.com/sel_work1/winslow.htm
trigpoint (2016-12-04 19:32:49+00:00): Thank you, looks interesting.
Hope you find number 7.
Cheers Phil
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:07:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435099 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44158628 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:07:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435084 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44158807 because there was a problem with licence of data use
KKS (2016-12-08 23:00:53+00:00): от для чого фігнею займатись.... я не розумію.
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-16 01:47:17+00:00): tobto?
KKS (2017-10-16 22:08:52+00:00): Оперативно, я навіть вже забув про що там мова була.. Мабуть про оцю фігню http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=44158965   https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457673705
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-16 22:58:44+00:00): ok )
velmyshanovnyi (2017-10-16 22:59:01+00:00): thnks
Hjart (2016-12-04 15:49:18+00:00): Vær venligst forsigtig når du bruger Maps.me til at rette i OSM, da det let går galt. Der lå 2 spisesteder oveni hinanden her og du fik fat i den forkerte og det er desværre. ikke så let at opdage i Maps.me. Jeg har dog rettet det tilbage og fordelt de 2 steder så de fremover er lettere at ramme.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:06:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435071 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44159048 because there was a problem with licence of data use
dan980 (2016-12-11 17:34:47+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su Openstreetmap! Ho visto che hai aggiunto l'ecomuseo, per renderlo visibile dovresti aggiungere l'etichetta più importante (amenity=museum). 
Dall'altra parte della strada hai inserito un punto di interesse con l'etichetta corretta amenity=museum, ma con un nome strano (edificio). Potresti gentilmente correggere? 

Ciao, e di nuovo benvenuto, buona mappatura
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:04:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435066 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44159294 because there was a problem with licence of data use
opendcc (2016-12-04 16:27:43+00:00): Hello,

please:
1. add a street, city and postal code to address entries.
2. do not span your edit across a very large area - here St. Gallen to Berlin.
3. add a upload comment.

Thank you
Granjow (2016-12-04 16:51:19+00:00): Hi opendcc,

thanks for observing the edits. Out of curiousity, how do you do it, manually, or are you running a probram which watches them?

1. Will do that. I am adding house numbers in OsmAnd+, but cannot add the rest there because it would be around 40 times slower.
2. This was by accident. I did not know about the remaining edits in Berlin, they were somewhere in the Osmand cache.
3. I added one in Osmand. Not sure why it does not show up here. Looks like a bug there.

Simon
opendcc (2016-12-04 17:30:02+00:00): Hello,

I'm checking edits in 'my' area manually.
Granjow (2016-12-04 18:04:22+00:00): Wow, nice.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:04:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435060 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44159342 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:03:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435045 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44159404 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 22:37:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44434619 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44159520 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 22:35:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44434599 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44159824 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 22:34:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44434598 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44159903 because there was a problem with licence of data use
trigpoint (2016-12-06 18:55:16+00:00): Is this really a public car park? Have you surveyed it. Looking at imagery it looks like it is private parking space for the surounding houses.
TestSkizze (2016-12-11 22:21:58+00:00): Hi Klaus, hab' diesen deinen CS bereits vor einigen Tagen mit'nem Schmunzeln bemerkt ;) und kann's mir nun doch nicht ganz verkneifen, dich abschließend auf meine beiden (erfolglosen) Versuche - und deine Antwort - in der Diskussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43796554 anzustupsen... ;)  
Ach ja, da der Steig (Path) nun nicht mehr "doppelt" ist, ist er jetzt auch NICHT mehr breiter gezeichnet...  Na ja, dies war vllt. auch ein gutes Beispiel, wie mit "knappem" Text und v.a. "viel" subjektiver Sichtweise "aneinander vorbei" argumentiert wird - da hatte < maxbe > komplett Recht: "Ihr habt kein grundsätzliches Problem miteinander, nur unterschiedliche Meinungen Im Detail." 
(Quelle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43900936 )
user_870861 (2016-12-04 17:56:26+00:00): hi KathleenMack,
be carrefool, you're adding tags buildings on roads ... like this one
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153342802/history
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 22:34:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44434593 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44160585 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 22:33:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44434591 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44160649 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 22:33:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44434572 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44160725 because there was a problem with licence of data use
Osm1980 (2016-12-05 12:21:01+00:00): اسم دریاچه به انگلیسی درسته؟
Mekru (2016-12-05 17:04:22+00:00): @Osm1980 نه، فکر کنم یکی دست کاریش کرده. درستش کردم.
paulatthehug (2016-12-04 17:47:01+00:00): Apologies, wrong source. Actual source was county council online definitive map at http://my.cambridgeshire.gov.uk/myCambridgeshire.aspx?MapSource=CCC/AllMaps&Layers=row,row-tab=maps
ACS1986 (2017-01-10 20:05:22+00:00): Hi Paul, because they are copyrighted sources we can't reuse information from the council's definitive maps unless they have explicitly allowed us to do so by releasing the information under a suitable license. What we can do is map the route that exists on the ground and the level of public rights (footpath bridleway etc.) shown on signposts/waymarks on the ground.
All the best,
Adam
paulatthehug (2017-01-10 23:07:22+00:00): OK, as a 4x4 green laner I always regarded signs on the ground as unreliable and for RoW determination only relied on the definitive map (which county council officers were always been happy to let me copy bits from onto my paper maps so perhaps they didn't know the rules either ;-)).

However in this case I have cycled this path on multiple occasions and it is clearly signed with a green "public bridleway" sign at each junction which is what tipped me off in the first place to check back to the definitive map. So we can treat that as the source and ignore the definitive map.

Anyway thanks for pointing this little potential "gotcha" out. I'll know how to proceed in future.
ACS1986 (2017-01-11 09:46:49+00:00): Hi Paul, 
That's great, problem solved. As a walker and off road cyclist I also share your frustration with poor RoW signposting. 
Just one important point because it does apply to all kinds of copyrighted sources: One of the main reason for the existence of OSM is that anybody is allowed to freely reuse all the information we put on it (subject to a few small conditions http://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright ).  The problem with using definitive map information on OSM isn't that the council would object to you or I copying a section of map for personal use, it is that they might well object to us publishing their data on OSM where that data can be freely used by anybody forever. So far only a small proportion of UK councils have been persuaded to release their information for reuse under a suitable license.
Hope that explanation helps. All the best and happy mapping :)
Adam
paulatthehug (2017-01-11 09:52:20+00:00): Thanks Adam. As I'm starting to do more edits now I'm slowly discovering these delights and every little bit of advice from other, more experienced, users helps.
paulatthehug (2017-01-11 10:33:03+00:00): Is there a list somewhere (on the wiki perhaps?) of this small proportion of UK councils?
ACS1986 (2017-01-11 16:22:13+00:00): Hi Paul,
I'm not sure I can be of much help. It's not something I've looked into recently. The last column of this table includes notes where users have requested release of the RoW information: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_local_councils#List_of_UK_Councils
I don't know how complete/up to date it is. In particular some councils might have recently taken advantage of the new Open Government Licence to release their RoW information. I think Rob Whittaker (Rjw62 on the wiki) http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Robert%20Whittaker might be the most knowledgeable person to contact for more information.
Kind regards,
Adam
DoDoMR (2016-12-05 13:07:33+00:00): Habe den Änderungssatz wieder reverted.
Auch wenn es sich um einen Privatweg handelt, kann dieser in OSM eingetragen werden.
Dass es sich um einen Privatweg handelt, wurde durch access=private entsprechend genüge getan.
Näheres unter: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 22:32:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44434562 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44160949 because there was a problem with licence of data use
maraf24 (2016-12-04 19:37:29+00:00): Ciekawe jest, że prawie nikt tego landuse nie dodaje, za to wszyscy stosują amenity.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-12-05 15:27:29+00:00): Oj tam, nie jest tak źle - http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/landuse=school#map ;-)
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-04 17:42:26+00:00): Hi gendel99, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting several buildings with housenumbers? Your survey is hopefuly not based on the used Bing aerial imagery ...

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44161332
gendel99 (2016-12-04 23:18:10+00:00): Hi! Because this buildings is absent in reality.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-05 17:29:43+00:00): Thank you very much for your answer. Happy mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-23 12:47:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127955987 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits from a while ago - ATMs in the middle of a forest, etc.
Ewen Hill (2016-12-09 22:00:21+00:00): Arietigue, doing a great job on Bathurst Island!
praeteritum (2024-01-16 12:11:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146321329.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 22:31:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44434492 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44162273 because there was a problem with licence of data use