piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-03 18:29:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104074571 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
JessAk71 (2021-04-26 19:05:09+00:00): Hello, please be careful when editing existing buildings. You have dropped the height and building tags for this building in this changeset but these are still valid tags. The building needs to be updated to replace these tags.
pabi12 (2021-04-27 04:13:49+00:00): We are notatying per guidance from OSM user https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Zartico.

What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.
FRooter (2021-04-12 07:38:52+00:00): I forgot to set sources in this edit.  I used first-hand/in-person survey knowledge, my GPS traces, and aerial/satellite imagery.
opendcc (2021-08-23 17:50:10+00:00): Hallo,
zu diesem Changeset gibt es eine Note: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2816330
ravali_78 (2021-04-15 04:17:16+00:00): Hi wuchunhung,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with residential highway way 28089951
Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102961436.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102781861
habi (2021-04-12 15:14:39+00:00): Ciao zulutoo

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Since my French is limited I'm writing you in English and hope that's fine for you :)


Since you've requested a review, here's my two cents: 
You've deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4327466590/history in this changeset [1].
Is the bar not existing anymore?

And - more importantly - you've invented a new tag here.
OSM is allowing for free-form tagging, but the tag for an attorney *does* exist, as you can see here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:office%3Dlawyer
In addition, 'stuffing' the data of the point of interest into the 'description' fails to make it machine-readable for consumers of OSM data.
I thus took the liberty to correct your addition and update the POI according to how I interpret them correctly in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102813370

Greetings from Bern,
habi
[1]: On which I funnily corrected the phone number two years ago :)
habi (2021-04-12 15:15:28+00:00): PS: The detailed changes are visualized here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102813370
zulutoo (2021-04-13 07:54:14+00:00): Thanks for your comments and corrections.  Sorry to be such an ignorant enthusiast :-)
Indeed the café at this adresse has changed name and owner.
habi (2021-04-13 08:59:50+00:00): No worries!
We're all here to make a better map for all.
So, at the moment there's only the 'Crêperie-Restaurant Marco Polo' and the 'Melocoton Club' in the vicinity.
Is this correct, or is there an additional bar in-between those?
zulutoo (2021-04-13 13:41:55+00:00): Yes, there is a new bar called "Le Passage" at the pace of the Decobar but I prefer not to interfere with the owner and let him mention it on the map
habi (2021-04-19 12:35:46+00:00): I guess the owner would be happy if his/her bar is shown on OSM.
As long as 'it is on the ground', we map it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability

I've added the bar/cafe here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103198501
Øukasz (2021-05-04 11:12:50+00:00): This appears to be a wrong edit to add a trunk road here. 

Can you let me know if you can fix this, or if you need any help?

Thank you
ravali_78 (2021-04-15 03:26:59+00:00): Hi Ken Chen,
I have fixed the alignment,as building polygon overlapping with residential way 35463627.Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102959508.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102782604
user_2066394 (2021-04-12 10:29:25+00:00): Warum die Straße am Bahnübergang komplett rausgenommen?
JessAk71 (2021-04-26 19:08:25+00:00): Hello, a large number of your changesets in this area, including this one, where you are merging nodes to buildings is resulting in duplicate information because you are also not then deleting the node you merged. If using iD you can use the merge function on the node and building and it will automatically remove the node. Unfortunately a large number of your changsets in this areas has done this and updates are needed to fix all of them.
JessAk71 (2021-05-02 20:29:45+00:00): I have fixed this case for you.
Utsab Khatiwada (2021-05-06 04:49:42+00:00): We are notatying per guidance from OSM user https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Zartico.

What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 11:56:52+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
pra_veen (2021-04-16 03:44:46+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygon
overlapping with service road. 
kindly check with node 8620981645,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103025320
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102783138
ravali_78 (2021-05-05 04:57:26+00:00): Hi chenscott,
I have removed service highway which is connected to waterway. 
Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104157111.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102783427
0000FF berries (2021-04-13 13:01:35+00:00): Γεια σου Νικ, καλώς ήρθες στο ΟpenStreetMap :)

Να 'σαι καλά που εμπλουτίζεις τα δεδομένα στο OpenStreetMap :) Αν ο Αη Λιάς (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8621010317) είναι εκκλησάκι, μπορείς να προσθέσεις την πληροφορία και θα εμφανιστεί και στον χάρτη. Επίσης, μπορείς να χαρτογραφήσεις και το κτήριο αν θες, και να προσθέσεις και άλλες πληροφορίες (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship), όπως κάνουμε οι υπόλοιποι/ες εθελόντρ(ι)ες. Αν έχεις απορίες, μπορείς να ρωτήσεις στο φόρουμ https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=27 ή στείλε μήνυμα.

Καλές χαρτογραφήσεις :)
ravali_78 (2021-05-05 04:50:31+00:00): Hi Jimlim69,
i have fixed classification,removed motorways and residentials in farmfields. Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104156092.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102784289
JessAk71 (2021-04-26 18:59:02+00:00): Hello, it looks like some of your changesets are removing the building tag from the building polygon. Since this is still a building please make sure to keep the building tag. In addition, it looks like you have moved the building outline so its no longer accurate, please do not modify building footprints that already look to be accurate, this polygon is now badly askew and needs to be fixed. In addition I see that when you are merging hotel nodes with buildings you are leaving the node behind, in iD you can merge them which will remove the node when its placed on the building. All your left over nodes should be removed...  unfortunately a high number of your changesets in this area all have these same issues...
pabi12 (2021-04-27 04:14:50+00:00): We are notatying per guidance from OSM user https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Zartico.

What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.
user_242798 (2021-12-07 20:14:49+00:00): Wat ik nog vergeet:

Note: This is not a tag for frontage road, sometimes called a service road. That should be tagged depending on what function the frontage road serves.

Dit is, bijvoorbeeld, een fietspad parallel aan de autoweg. Maar af en toe geeft dit ook toegang tot de woningen. Het fietspad wijzigt dan in highway=residential ('should be tagged depending on what function the frontage road serves') en wordt daarna weer fietspad.

Voorbeeld: Utrechtseweg van Utrecht naar Amersfoort.
JessAk71 (2021-05-05 18:48:56+00:00): Hello, this changeset looks like it has misshaped the adjacent building outlines. I have fixed this for you here but please be more careful in future edits.
Utsab Khatiwada (2021-05-06 04:47:45+00:00): Thank you for fixing it. I'll be more careful from now on.
Xapitoun (2021-04-13 07:10:52+00:00): Bonjour,
pour les baobas, c'est pas mal de les ajouter. Après si tu mets déja name=Baobab, je pense que c'est inutile de mettre species=baobab et genus=baobab, ca duplique l'information inutilement surtout que pour le baobab, genus=Adansonia et spécies=A. digitata
Abn_976 (2021-04-13 08:22:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour la remarque. Je rectifie tout ça.
Cordialement
pra_veen (2021-04-15 10:01:19+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with Tertiary road. 
kindly check with node 8631711104,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102984651
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102785055
Kovoschiz (2021-04-12 10:53:49+00:00): It's not good that conflate Tai Po Central and Tai Po Centre.
kubahahaha (2023-09-21 21:42:16+00:00): Co to jest Sól?
place=locality - niezamieszkałe wygląda dziwnie, bo tuż obok są zabudowania
Dawid2849 (2023-09-21 21:58:14+00:00): Szczerze mówiąc to nie pamiętam, wziąłem to na pewno z PRNG
Dawid2849 (2023-09-21 21:59:45+00:00): Może to odnosi się do kancelarii Leśnictwa Sól? Leśnictwo Sól ma swoją siedzibę w Ciosmach, ale że wieś Sól jest daleko od Ciosmów, to ktoś to dodał do PRNG? Często w PRNG są jakieś leśniczówki czy inne cuda na kiju
Dawid2849 (2023-09-21 22:02:08+00:00): Często nazwy też są źle odmienione. Przykładowo Mijak w Ciosmach, a w PRNG Myjak (nigdy nie spotkałem się z taką nazwą, ani na mapach ani od lokalsów, a mam dobrego kolegę, który tu mieszka i często się  umawialiśmy na rajdy rowerowe właśnie na Mijaku). To samo jest z Pszczelną (Pszczelnem według PRNG). Ja bym to place=locally skasował.
kubahahaha (2023-09-21 22:11:21+00:00): Wywalam w takim razie.
Wiem że w PRNG są głupoty, problem taki że większość boi się tego dotykać.
Często położenie też jest słabe, wiele z tego mogło by być poprawione.
Pzdr
Dawid2849 (2023-09-21 22:11:38+00:00): Na część Ciosmów od skrzyżowania na początku wsi do końca zabudowy w kierunku Mijaka (dwa stawy przy drodze Ciosmy - Bukowa) mówi się Byczek, bez dziwnych wyjątków (w postaci tej Soli).
Dawid2849 (2023-09-21 22:13:34+00:00): Dzięki za przypomnienie mi o tym i za skasowanie tego! Locality tak kiepsko się renderują na carto, że łatwo jest przeoczyć jakąś głupotę...
pra_veen (2021-04-15 09:12:00+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with service road. 
kindly check with node 8631605664,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102981121
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102786359
ravali_78 (2021-04-16 12:18:34+00:00): Hi mctsai,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygons overlapping with residential highways
way 225545478,way 253972231 kindly check with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103059351.
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102787160
pra_veen (2021-04-15 08:40:02+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygon 
overlapping with residential road. 
kindly check with node 8631484138,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102978838
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102787563
gows! (2024-05-31 06:35:44+00:00): Please change to BINUS SCHOOL Serpong
gows! (2024-05-31 06:53:43+00:00): Binus International School - Serpong changed to BINUS SCHOOL Serpong
HamiDesert (2024-06-03 05:45:35+00:00): Hey gows! SozhRiver is no long on the team so I am responding on their behalf. I appreciate you reaching out and confirming the updated name for this school. Have a great day!
Becky Candy (2021-05-10 14:02:19+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102788052
BCNorwich (2021-04-12 16:00:22+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Yes, a mistake here with the house and bridge. I've now mapped the bridge and house. The bridge, house and drain are named so I've added the names to OSM.

The node below is the street lamp you queried on the OSM help forum.

Hope this helps, need more help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Barrie1956 (2021-04-12 16:23:32+00:00): Bernard, Thanks for tidying up the house, but how do I remove "Marked as isolated dwelling. Is actually just a bridge over the drain" from the street lamp? Why is it even there? Something to do with the orange rectangle? I'm still very new to this.
BCNorwich (2021-04-12 17:35:35+00:00): Hi, It is removed, you did remove it.
This page is your changeset, below you can see a list of nodes, node 8621207054, this was the streetlamp that you've now removed, (thanks). The other node 2917742035, which is struck out, means that it is not now in the database, it's deleted. Your browser might be showing an old cached tile, refresh the browser or reload the page.

Regards Bernard.
Puxan (2021-04-12 11:23:47+00:00): Hola, bienvenido a OpenStreetMap.  
Veo que has mapeado en Burundi. Buen trabajo.  
Los senderos o las carreteras no deben superponerse a los edificios, se deben mantener separados.  No olvides escuadrar los edificios
  
Muy bien, sigue mapeando.         
Joaquim.           

Te recomiendo ver los tutoriales de https://learnosm.org  

(Automatic translation)

Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you have mapped in Burundi. Nice job.                   

Paths or roads should not overlap buildings, they should be kept separate. Don't forget to square the buildings
  
Alright, keep mapping.
Joaquim.

I recommend you see the tutorials at https://learnosm.org
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102788540
PT-53 (2021-04-12 10:18:02+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
bei diesen beiden Ladestationen
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8621225749/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8621225749/history
fehlen noch wichtige Angaben.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=charging%20station?uselang=de
Ohne die Angaben Fahrzeugart und Steckertyp weiß niemand, ob er sein Fahrzeug dort laden kann.
Grüße
pra_veen (2021-04-15 08:00:21+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygon 
overlapping with residential road. 
kindly check with way 765567081,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102975753
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102788831
user_5359 (2021-04-12 14:47:30+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set (without any OSM key). Please explain the source of this information and the meaning (!) of the keys.
See https://www.osm.org/way/929621557,
https://www.osm.org/way/929621554,
https://www.osm.org/way/929693680,
https://www.osm.org/way/929614194
Becky Candy (2021-05-10 13:14:58+00:00): Please remember to the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102789349
filbro (2021-04-12 20:04:35+00:00): Lieber Baumläufer, nimm es mir bitte nicht übel, aber ich habe mir erlaubt diesen „Platz“ anzupassen. Ich war gestern vor Ort und habe, mit bestem Wissen und Gewissen, daraus eine normale area=yes mit den von dir bereits gesetzten surface und smoothness tags gemacht. Den Namen habe ich auch erhalten. Aber mit Parkplatz und square hat das einfach nichts zu tun. Des Weiteren habe ich den Forstweg wieder durchgängig gemacht.
Viele Grüße, Filip
habi (2021-04-12 09:20:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
habi (2021-04-12 09:22:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
pra_veen (2021-04-15 07:36:36+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the incorrect alignment of residential road, as per the ground truth.
kindly check with way 894511676,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102974031
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102790042
habi (2021-04-12 09:26:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
eggie (2021-05-18 20:36:23+00:00): Hi Marcelo
removed bicycle= designated from cycleway
Greetz,
eggie
Becky Candy (2021-04-12 10:39:06+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102790630
Becky Candy (2021-04-12 10:10:24+00:00): Great mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102790637
Becky Candy (2021-04-12 09:54:41+00:00): Please remember to square the building by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q , Thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102790655
Becky Candy (2021-04-12 09:48:27+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing the key Q, thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102790657
habi (2021-04-12 09:37:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
pra_veen (2021-04-15 07:22:44+00:00): Hi Mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road. 
kindly check with way 894845180,
with the corrected changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102973034
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102791249
SomeoneElse (2021-06-04 17:32:09+00:00): Hello,
This changeset has copied the tags from the existing hotel https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4747951301 onto the building so that it looks like there are two hotels here.  Why have you done this?  In what way was it wrong before?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-06-04 17:33:10+00:00): (apologies for not spotting it earlier, by the way)
Utsab Khatiwada (2021-06-06 01:29:31+00:00): Hi,
We did this because at that time we were unknown about merging feature and now we are trying to fix all from the top.
Thank you.
habi (2021-04-12 09:45:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
tom_yorados (2021-04-12 10:15:31+00:00): Source: Bayern(80cm); Survey
Change: building outlines / numbers
habi (2021-04-12 09:56:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
habi (2021-04-12 09:57:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
impiaaa (2021-04-12 14:08:31+00:00): This removes the heritage name of the building. Please undo this change.
impiaaa (2021-04-13 14:47:45+00:00): Reverted with changeset  102793838
impiaaa (2021-04-13 14:47:58+00:00): sorry, changeset 102872884
eggie (2021-04-12 19:36:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
ravali_78 (2021-04-16 12:01:04+00:00): Hi BKempny,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with residential road 
way 241299448 kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103058276.
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102794342
pio2_122 (2021-04-12 12:02:13+00:00): Nielegalne przejścia przez tory lepiej oznaczyć jako highway=path i access=no, zamiast foot=no w punkcie przecięcia ścieżki z torem.
BCNorwich (2021-04-14 07:36:41+00:00): Duplicated highway removed, please be careful no to duplicate ways. Thanks.
BCNorwich (2021-04-14 07:37:33+00:00): Oh, and it's really silly to tag it motorway!
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-05-01 20:18:04+00:00): Your identical size and identical orientation buildings copy-pasted with complete disregard for reality are horrible.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-03 10:39:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113325200 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI edits of unknown provenance where the editor has refused contact with the US community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5420 ..
Strubbl (2021-05-15 19:10:23+00:00): Hallo CreCrePL, wie kommst du darauf, dass bicycle=no auf dem Weg neben dem Innsbrucker Ring zu setzen? Vor allem ist der Tag gegensätzlich zu dem, was da bereits gemappt war.
CreCrePL (2021-05-15 20:01:19+00:00): I think, the cyclepath is running directly next to the road as cyclelane=track, maybe with a sign, and that path is a simple walkway - I don't remember anymore - the dashcam video was deleted a long time ago, and I don't drive through there.
Strubbl (2021-05-15 20:08:41+00:00): Sorry, there is no lane on the street for bicycle. The way where you added bicycle=no is a separate way, segregated for foot and bicycle, and it was correctly mapped before your change, e.g. see here: https://kartaview.org/details/3525645/1382/track-info
The sign you see here says that even have to use the way next to the street and you are not allowed to use the street.
Reza Babri (2021-04-13 04:13:18+00:00): سلام آقا کاوه

natural=ridge
برای ثبت خط الرأسها استفاده میشه و باید خطی ثبت بشه و ترجیحاً نباید بصورت نقطه ثبت بشه. مگر اینکه موقتاً نقطه ای ثبت کنید تا بعداً مسیر اصلی آنها بصورت خطی رسم بشه.
<BR>
اگر منظور شما فقط نشون دادن اسم کوه در اون منطقه است (نه خط الرأس و نه قله) ظاهراً تگ استانداردی براش موجود نیست و میشه از 
place=locality
استفاده کرد.
فقط مراقب باش که در این مورد به نقشه های توپوگرافی اعتماد نکنی 
;)
karson_ (2021-04-12 14:16:39+00:00): What gives you the idea a state owned facility can't be commercial? Would you argue a DMV office isn't commercial?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102796748
Begum Rokeya (2021-04-12 16:33:56+00:00): As far as the DMV is only collecting fees, but not striving for profits I wouldn't call it commercial.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commerce

BTW: I've restored the tag to get back a rendering.