piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cytryn (2021-12-20 15:00:00+00:00): Hej,
Dlaczego przerobiłeś skwer na trawnik? Oba elementy były tu obrysowane niezależnie od siebie, a obszar trawy nie pokrywa się z obszarem skweru. Teraz są dwa nakładające się na siebie landuse=grass... To samo dotyczy https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115109473
kasztelan111 (2021-12-20 17:37:36+00:00): rzeczywiście nie zwróciłem uwagi, że te elementy się nakładają
Larmax (2021-12-19 18:07:35+00:00): Hi, please leave a comment on your changeset that describes the changes you made: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Uğur Öztürk (2021-12-18 21:33:19+00:00): How to abort this ?
eggie (2021-12-18 22:52:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback...  een bestaand pad verwijderen ligt wat gevoelig in OSM.  Ook als het over privegrond loopt. 

Je kunt zo'n pad de extra tag access=private meegeven. Het zal dan minder prominent renderen op de kaart en zeker nier routeren in OSM.
Die tag heb je op de hekken ook correct toegevoegd.
Is hier wel of geen pad?



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
B_mon (2021-12-19 09:29:39+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Het pad dat ik verwijderd heb bestaat fysiek ook niet, er is ook geen spoor en lopen enkel af en toe schapen en koeien. Ik heb er deze zomer en najaar gelopen en enkel de lijn op OSM hielp met navigeren. Ik heb bovenin de hekken bovenin hebben geen pad. De hekken in de ijdoorn polder en bij het kinselmeer hebben wel een pad maar hier staat een bord verboden toegang. Ik hoop dat dit helpt.
eggie (2021-12-19 09:46:47+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk..
Je hebt het dan correct aangepast.
Mapse..
Eggie
Wulfmorn (2022-06-27 09:48:31+00:00): These were probably meant to be "note", not "noname": https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/noname=Haltestelle%20aufgehoben%20wegen%20Inbetriebnahme%20der%20Stra%C3%9Fenbahn%20in%20der%20Kriegsstra%C3%9Fe
Nakaner (2022-06-27 13:02:36+00:00): Hi,

thank you for your comment. I improved the tagging.

Best regards

Michael
eggie (2022-01-11 11:08:10+00:00): Hoi.. De wegrichting liep hier verkeerd. Ik heb de wegrichting gedraaid. 
Groet
eggie
emvee (2022-01-11 17:55:53+00:00): Ik snap niet helemaal wat er fout was

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115110278
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116019250

Stond er een stuk oneway in de verkeerde richting?

Van het weekend nog naar Osmose issues gekeken voor objecten waar ik de laatste editor was maar daar ben ik de Telgerweg niet tegen gekomen.

Maar.. bedankt voor het oplossen!
eggie (2022-01-11 18:05:07+00:00): Yepp..., maar ik ben hier een relatief nieuwe mapper aan het helpen. De busroutes liepen hier nu over de verkeerde weghelft. Soms is het lastig te zien wie wat heeft gedaan. 
Zou zomaar bewuste mapper zijn geweest. 
Kwam het bij toeval tegen en dan ga je steeds verder kijken. Kom dan steeds meer tegen.
Routeren deed het over de hele Telgerweg niet meer.
Een oversteek  bij die verdubbeling van de weg ontbrak bv..  
De communicatie loopt wat moeizaam op de changesets.
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9632584

Groet
eggie
DaveF (2022-08-20 13:48:33+00:00): Hi

Please refrain from adding service=siding to railway tracks which are clearly for passengers trains which stop at platforms allowing passengers to disembark 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44200515

https://www.nationalrail.co.uk/stations-and-destinations/stations-made-easy/perth-station-plan
A-d-r-i (2021-12-19 17:02:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Attention avec les modifications de "grande échelle" en se basant uniquement sur la BDOrtho. Les images aériennes peuvent ne pas être à jour (en Corse du Sud, la dernière version date de 2019). Ce qui amène à des problèmes comme cet exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984706082/history
Il s'agit d'un bâtiment existant que j'ai cartographié sur le terrain, mais qui n'apparaît pas encore sur les photos aériennes.

Dans tous les cas il vaut mieux privilégier la cartographie de terrain que celle uniquement basée sur les photographies aériennes.

Dernier point à noter : une description de changeset plus détaillée que l'actuelle car vos modifications sont plus larges que des simples ajouts de lieux-dits/nommage de route.

Merci !
Kioska Journo (2021-12-19 17:40:25+00:00): ah zut, effectivement j'ai pris la mauvaise habitude de ne pas toujours vérifier l'historique. C'est vrai que mon changeset était trop gros, je m'étais mis en tête hier de faire une passe sur tout porto-vecchio, mais j'aurais dû me limiter à un quartier à la fois. Maintenant je suis bon pour corriger ce que j'ai cassé :/
A-d-r-i (2021-12-19 17:45:05+00:00): Merci pour votre réponse !

J'ai corrigé pour le bâtiment cité et je corrigerai si je vois d'autres erreurs "flagrantes", ne vous embêtez pas à tout revérifier.
Kioska Journo (2021-12-21 15:47:09+00:00): Pour votre information, j'ai essayé pour la 1ère fois le visualisateur de Pascal Neis, et c'est vraiment pas mal pour vérifier ce qui a été supprimé: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=115111000#16/41.6559/9.3000
A-d-r-i (2021-12-21 18:10:18+00:00): Oui c'est exactement comme cela que j'ai vu vos modifications 😊
nmombo12 (2021-12-20 19:08:04+00:00): Hello Dave, was the residential area (way 972107003) demolished? It appears to exist in all aerial imagery I can access.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115111583
MxxCon (2021-12-20 02:09:41+00:00): Hello.
Small suggestion regarding this edit. :) If you select multiple nodes and press S, it'll aligned them all to a line. It could be done with all these benches so that they look nice and straight rather than dropped by a drunk bomber😉
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115111661
a_d_s (2021-12-20 10:04:03+00:00): I could do that, if the benches were indeed in a straight line. They are not ;-)
Left and right they forn a wobbling line along the path.
MxxCon (2021-12-20 13:13:07+00:00): Ah, alright 👍I thought maybe you dropped them without realizing there's easy way to make them straight line.
eggie (2021-12-19 06:56:22+00:00): Dag Mro...Is ING niet de operator van de ATM?  Je hebt dat nu veranderd in ING servicepunt
Is er hier meer dan een ATM?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-19 07:00:38+00:00): Dag Mro.. Alle begin is moeilijk. Probeer gras en bos gescheiden te houden. Kijk even hoe ik dat heb gedaan.
MVG
eggie
wille (2022-01-06 13:08:57+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Em postos de combustível, use building=roof para a área das bombas. Talvez o editor liste essa opção como "Teto".

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115112086
wille (2022-01-06 13:09:47+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Fiz algumas correções em sua edição: use building=roof para marcar o teto dos postos de combustível. Você pode simplesmente apagar edifícios demolidos.
Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115112086
Jrachi (2024-11-05 08:13:23+00:00): Ciao.
In questo changeset hai inserito  su un path i tag:
foot=yes
bicycle=yes
che sono completamente inutili e fuorvianti
Ma soprattutto hai inserito:
oneway=yes
Che ha un significato piuttosto strano per un sentiero!
Forse intendevi indicare che si tratta di una pista ciclabile?
Ivo
capataz (2024-11-05 09:26:53+00:00): ciao, quale path ? Da qui non lo capisco.
Jrachi (2024-11-05 10:41:26+00:00): Sto facendo zapping sulle relazioni in tutta Italia, e non ritrovo al volo quale era.
Potresti trovarli facilmente con una query Overpass tipo:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1TFF

Ivo
wireguy (2021-12-19 12:49:27+00:00): hi Isopycnic,  two points. 
- your changeset comment is not very descriptive of the work you fixed.   see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

- the fix breaks the boundary relations of South Weldon and Weldon

Can you try and correct?
Isopycnic (2021-12-20 01:00:52+00:00): Thanks for the changelog comment tips. I’ll start to work on better descriptions. 

As for the boundary relations, I think I’m a little limited on id on my iPad on fixing this issue then waiting for hours for it to show on Osm inspector on http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ to see whether it is incorrect. I’m hoping to find a good tool like josm but for an iPad device.
eggie (2021-12-19 06:52:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
segubi (2023-05-18 17:36:06+00:00): ... stolpere gerade über die embankment-Tags. embankment wird nur für künstlich aufgeschüttete Dämme benutzt. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:embankment
Ich habe die ganzen embankment=yes erst einmal noch dringelassen, damit keine Informationen verschwinden, es sollte aber geändert werden. Das korrekte Tagging scheint nach wiki mit natural=cliff, ggf. auch mal natural=earth_bank zu sein (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dcliff) , mildere Abhänge werden wohl nicht unbedingt getaggt. Bin heute bei Dissen auf dem Petersbrink gewesen. Dass man den Grat irgendwie markieren möchte, kann ich nachvollziehen... Grüße, Sebastian
segubi (2023-05-18 17:45:33+00:00): Nachtrag: Das korrekte Tag für den Rücken ist natural=ridge, was dummerweise nicht bei "siehe auch" auf den Wikiseiten erwähnt wird. Das ändere ich allerdings gleich mal...
An einigen Stellen ist es sogar bereits vorhanden, das "embankment=yes" also redundant. Da kann es auch jetzt schon raus...
DeFra85 (2023-05-18 18:39:20+00:00): Ah okay. Bei ID wird das als Dammlage bei Wegen geführt
segubi (2023-05-19 18:09:28+00:00): ... kein so tolles Wort. Ein Damm ist natürlich schon etwas anderes als ein Bergrücken.
Das normale Tagging ist etwas umständlicher, da der Bergrücken nicht auf den gleichen "Way" getaggt werden sollte wie der way=highway. Die geologische Formation gehört auf ein anderes OSM-Objekt als die Straße.
Glassman (2021-12-19 19:00:29+00:00): #TIP: If you see a feature offset, it could just be the imagery you are using. The offset can be adjusted using the background icon in the editor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115112998
Glassman (2021-12-19 19:01:57+00:00): #TIP: highway=unclassified is basically a residential street in rural areas.  Because OSM was started in the UK, we use their highway classification system.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115112998
jodd (2022-01-28 18:22:15+00:00): Hallo JeLuF,
danke für die Anpassungen. Ich bin mir aber ziemlich sicher, dass der im Changeset-Kommentar verlinkte Plan keine für OSM zulässige Quelle ist. Warst du vor Ort oder hast du die Änderungen nur anhand des Plans eingetragen? Leider hast du nämlich nicht explizit eine Quelle angegeben.
VG jodd
JeLuF (2022-01-29 14:05:32+00:00): Hallo jodd,

Ja, ich wohne um die Ecke und kenne die Situation vor Ort. Der Plan war nur die Gedankenstütze.

Grüße,

JeLuF
jodd (2022-01-29 14:26:58+00:00): Okay. Danke für die Info. Ich war auch schon am umgebauten Bahnübergang und werde bei Gelegenheit mal noch weiter aktualisieren.
VG jodd
abakus_uploader (2021-12-19 23:31:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
JesseFTW (2021-12-19 17:18:22+00:00): Thank you for this, I've been meaning to get to it!
andrewsuzuki (2022-05-07 03:32:35+00:00): Hi, the wiki on tunnel=building_passage says not to add the layer tag for typical cases, as you did for way 115113505 (you added layer=-1). Just a heads up, I will revert.
iccaldwell (2021-12-19 14:13:16+00:00): Why is 35 The Lane an attraction?
user_5359 (2021-12-19 07:56:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
N0BTC (2021-12-19 12:10:51+00:00): I do not actually know the number. I just know that the house exists
user_5359 (2021-12-19 07:55:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node.
wireguy (2021-12-19 12:15:54+00:00): hi zestyeel, i think you also removed a way from the  boundary relation for Harrisville.  I added it back, can you check it over
ZestyEel (2021-12-19 14:49:14+00:00): Thank you!
user_5359 (2021-12-19 07:53:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! An address isn't a street name.If you want to mark a address please look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:addr.
DanteD2323 (2021-12-19 04:12:36+00:00): Fixed lake designation and phantom fairway.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-19 15:06:54+00:00): Your changeset comment is "Added businesses" but all objects are v2 here?
Please use changeset comments that actually describe the change made.
JriSv250 (2021-12-22 20:58:12+00:00): The elements were already there, but there were no specific tags when I surveyed the businesses.
user_5359 (2021-12-19 07:50:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of the address node https://www.osm.org/node/3807639606. You move this node more than 100 meters from the original position.
user_5359 (2021-12-19 07:48:31+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! What is the reason for "ocal traffic only, can't route through". Did you know the key access (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access)?
mcfly777 (2021-12-21 05:31:00+00:00): For cars coming from Hillsdale going to Edgewater, you’re not allowed to cut through Altair. There’s a sign on Hillsdale saying local traffic only
goldfndr (2021-12-28 03:49:17+00:00): A minor request: when you do the name changes, could you please put the former name in an "old_name" value? It potentially helps people searching for a shop they used to use that maybe hadn't changed much.

Thanks for resolving these, I (obviously) never seem to get around to them.
literan (2021-12-19 16:09:25+00:00): "круглый" дом уже есть на карте, не надо дублировать объекты.

тег tourism=attraction - для признанных туристических достопримечательностей, как Эйфелева башня (грубо гоовря, куда туристов автобусами возят фотографироваться). Здесь этот тег вообще ни к чему
hvalentim (2021-12-19 09:54:06+00:00): Excelente e muito necessário trabalho de atualização. Apenas uma nota: os autocarros provindos da Costa pelo IC20, com destino a Lisboa (e.g. 161, 158) , nunca entram na A2/acesso à ponte diretamente. Ao invés passam por baixo dela e vão à rotunda Centro-Sul apanhar a faixa dedicada para TP (saída às 10H - 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13412564)
hvalentim (2021-12-19 10:00:32+00:00): PS: A faixa para TP já existia nas "Orthophotos of the coastal areas of mainland Portugal - 10cm - 2014-2015 (DGT)"
hvalentim (2021-12-19 10:04:27+00:00): PS2: Queria escrever autocarro nº "153" e não "158".
attili1 (2021-12-22 07:47:08+00:00): Hello pedroky,

Trust you are doing well! 
While mapping in the Perean Kangin Village we observed that a few of the mapped residential roads were deleted. Would you mind sharing the source for deleting the roads in this changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115115897/?

Thank you, looking forward to hearing from you.

Happy Mapping
Manoj
tonyf1 (2022-02-08 20:36:34+00:00): Hi. Can you please give your reasoning for tagging Seaford Foreshore Walking Track (41938008) bicycle=yes, its relevant to later changeset discussion.
MichaelCollinson (2022-02-08 23:52:19+00:00): Hi, I am aware that some paths in the area have been mistakenly marked bicycle=no. I am now in the area and carefully verifying by ground survey. In this instance, the path is obviously not "associated with a road" (i.e. not a VIC sidewalk), is habitually used by and fit for cyclists as a secondary use and has no explicit prohibition (despite other signage).
muralito (2025-04-05 01:00:36+00:00): Hi. In this changeset you seems to add tag "not:brand:wikidata" while keeping "brand:wikidata" with the same value. According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:not:brand:wikidata both values should not be equal.

Please verify. Thanks.
jake_penguins (2025-04-05 06:59:41+00:00): No idea how that happened, but no, that tag shouldn't be there.
SekeRob (2021-12-19 17:53:40+00:00): Hi,

I've repaired your 'aggiornamenti' as you left the big orchard "layer:	ring_not_closed obj_type:	r
obj_id:	13567015"

see https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&relation=13567015

When closing an edit set, view it for any warnings. There's one on this one: warnings:mismatched_geometry:unclosed_multipolygon_part meaning the orchard did not have a complete ring. Normally ID Editor gives the warning before saving but not always which is why reviewing the edit set after saving is important.

cheers and happy mapping.
ChehrehBargi (2023-03-10 11:00:30+00:00): سلام ضمن خسته نباشید
شما نام این بزرگراه را خلاصه سازی کرده اید در حالی که در ویکی osm داریم: تگ name برای نام کامل موجود در تابلو هست و تگ short name برای نام خلاصه شده یا نام کوتاه. هر دو را اصلاح میکنم.
gadget (2021-12-25 14:14:07+00:00): It still isn't rendering. What change did you apply to the relation before you closed the the issue? I do see several issues on the US side of the lake that I am not sure how to fix. namely that the relation is encompassing spaces that include bays and rivers which are  separately named features and not part of the lake. the view I still see the problem with is:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo,_New_York#/map/0
DENelson83 (2021-12-25 21:22:04+00:00): What I did was simply reorder the relation members in order, forming closed loops.  There must be something else wrong with Lakes Huron and Ontario.  Maybe if we compare them to the other Great Lakes, we will find the problem.
syntex (2021-12-19 10:49:45+00:00): Nie dodałeś old_name i old_ref
BCNorwich (2021-12-20 09:18:24+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Unfortunately this is not drawn as a roundabout, and your edit has dragged the existing highways out of alignment which corrupts proper routing. Thus I've reverted the changeset.

If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
opendcc (2021-12-21 07:20:29+00:00): Hallo,

die Zufahrten oben waren bisher als primary_link getagged, Du hast das auf primary geändert. Da es eher nur einspurige Auffahrten sind, würde ich das alte Tagging besser finden.
normalisdesned (2021-12-31 07:07:03+00:00): Hallo opendcc,
Änder die eine Zufahrt aus Richtung Inzell ab die du meinst wenn es für dich sinnvoll ist.
Supaplex (2021-12-19 14:10:44+00:00): Why do you remove some turn restrictions? Are you not restricted anymore?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115117570
Valarr (2021-12-19 15:36:08+00:00): 是單行道, 加了oneway=yes就不需要restriction
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52248939
EMREOYUN (2021-12-21 21:19:10+00:00): OpenStreetMap'e hoş geldiniz. Düzenlediğiniz yol bir park yolu olarak durmamakla beraber parking_aside etiketi eski haline döndürülmüştür. Lütfen yolların hangi fonksiyonlarda kullanıldığını bilmiyorsanız değiştirmeyin. Eğer yol gerçekten park yolu ise yeniden düzenleyip park_aside grubunu yeniden atayabilirsiniz. Tekrardan hoş geldiniz :)
turepalsson (2021-12-22 06:29:10+00:00): Jag tror du lyckades göra https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1458880 till medlem av sig själv där. :)
StefanHRT (2021-12-19 09:25:22+00:00): Hallo,
gemäß https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren war path als Wegart schon richtig ;)

VG
eggie (2021-12-19 10:19:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
vasony (2021-12-19 12:21:29+00:00): Úgy tűnik van egy kerékpárút is a főút mellett, ha még megvan az offset
Falsernet (2021-12-22 02:22:40+00:00): Replacing cycleways with cycleway=track is just vandalism. It doesn't make the map any better or more accurate
TomJeffs (2021-12-22 14:34:05+00:00): I don't agree.  The "cycleways" along Marsland Road are just very old and outdated shared footways.  They are an integral part of the highway - they aren't physically separate highways in their own right.  Thus, it's inaccurate to draw them as such.
Falsernet (2021-12-23 20:14:34+00:00): You're not the first person to say that but there is such a thing as pavement mapping. In no way is it inaccurate if the pavement is actually there to map it and tag whether it's shared use or not. "Integral" is debatable, it's not unreasonable to argue that a kerb splits them up, in a much different way to a cycle lane. I've had some success getting changesets that do the same thing reverted by DWG. It can also lead to cycleway=track on roads with a pavement mapped alongside, because what would otherwise be mapped separately is just a tag that one might forget to check for, which ends up being legitimately inaccurate. Pavement mapping is a growing practice and you can now find entire towns (such as Newton-le-Willows) covered almost entirely by it.
AndySchulte (2022-09-05 08:34:58+00:00): Hallo didimosi,

bist du die mit addr:city=Südheide sicher?
Lt. https://www.postdirekt.de/plzserver/
gibt es Südheide als Stadt oder Ort nicht.
Müsste es demzufolge nicht
addr:postcode=29320
addr:city=Hermannsburg
addr:suburb=Beckedorf
heißen?

Grüße
Andy
didimosi (2022-09-05 11:47:19+00:00): Hallo Andy,
die Situation ist hier kompliziert, denn die Gemeinde Hermannsburg gibt es seit dem 1.21.2015 nicht mehr, sie ist gemeinsam mit Unterlüß in der neuen Gemeinde Südheide aufgegangen: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%BCdheide_(Gemeinde)
Es geht auch bei den Anschriften der Einwohner, die diese selbst angeben  (ich habe nur mal ein paar Firmen in/um Beckedorf angeschaut), lustig durcheinander: mal nennen sie als Postanschrift Hermannsburg, mal Südheide. Auf jeden Fall hat die Post diese Änderung bis heute nicht nachvollzogen (das hattest du auf dem PLZ-Server ja schon festgestellt.
Wenn man hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:*
mal nachschaut, steht da ganz eindeutig:

"Name der Stadt beziehungsweise der Ortschaft allgemein (Dorf usw.), wie er in postalischen Adressen angegeben wird. In Deutschland der Name der politischen Gemeinde, auch wenn die Adresse in einem Stadtteil mit anderem Namen liegt. "

Danach kann nur Südheide als addr:city richtig sein und man müsste alle Adressen im Bereich der ehemaligen Gemeinden Hermannsburg und Unterlüß mit
addr:city = Südheide
und
addr:suburb= Hermansburg
addr:suburb=Unterlüß
addr:suburb=Beckededorf
und so weiter getaggt werden.
Oder hast du andere Informationen?

Grüße DidiMosi
AndySchulte (2022-09-09 13:10:07+00:00): Hallo DidiMosi,

nein, leider habe ich momentan keine anderen Info´s. Habe aber die Gemeinde angeschrieben, mit der Bitte un Auskunft, wie es aus deren Sicht korrekt sein soll. Nun heißt es abwarten. 

Gruß 
Andy
driesverlinden (2023-10-31 12:08:24+00:00): Is de promenade ondertussen afgewerkt?
tomdevinck (2023-11-02 13:52:45+00:00): nog steeds geen toegang, lange termijn project https://www.agentschapmdk.be/nl/projecten/stormvloedkering-nieuwpoort