piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-11-26 12:38:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not allways in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapped as 1 building.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects.
E: Buildings not squared.
G: Included the shadow of the mapped building in the mapping



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114239694
SomeoneElse (2021-11-25 22:17:09+00:00): There are some bits where I can't remember the actial route, but I'm pretty sure that it goes over Fan-y-Big rather than taking the (very damp!) straight line.
Eifelkobold! (2021-11-26 21:49:27+00:00): Guten Abend wobi9000,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass du NRW-weit sehr viele Handymasten eingetragen hast. Auf dem von dir als einzige Quelle angegebenen NRW-Luftbild kann zumindest ich nicht alle Standorte ohne weiteres erkennen. Insbesondere auf Dächern montierte Anlagen heben sich oft nur sehr schlecht ab. Auch dieser hier ist meiner Meinung nach nur mit Vorwissen erkennbar. Aus welcher Quelle beziehst du deine Informationen über die Standorte und Eigenschaften?

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
olehz (2021-11-26 15:39:22+00:00): Ну просили ж не совати дороги! Особливо там де є купа треків!!!
olehz (2021-11-26 15:46:13+00:00): https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/rygSZvzUPQ0XQPHShK3fs2Vm9o4m81UhKfERn6gGWDjzUD1LIOb42ITNdjf8wNYT9RCKHIQH81jI_Z-RXbgrelggPigina3XNGzxk0kgFNySAi52QiW7WWXrUSxEy8eRUAyKQe2A
olehz (2021-11-26 15:52:06+00:00): на який біс наносити "тяп-ляп" ті житлові зоні ігноруючи GPS треки? воно майже ніде не використовується на відміну від доріг. Я зовсім не в захваті, що ти паплюжиш мою роботу. Там у Стебнику повна срака з якістю даних, помилок море, повчився би там для початку, а ти вже і в Борислав заліз.
Shyshka (2021-11-27 18:56:21+00:00): І що з тих GPS треків, коли на супутнику вони і дороги зовсім по-іншому виглядають? То ж нереально редагувати інші об'єкти. І не "тяп-ляп". Тяп-ляп виглядає Борислав зараз, я стараюсь хоч житлові зони нанести, бо вони ж всюди є, тільки чомусь не в Бориславі
Shyshka (2021-11-27 19:42:27+00:00): В Бориславі тупо немає нічого. Окрім криво намальованих доріг і будинків, і то далеко не всіх. Але ви це вважаєте нормальним
olehz (2021-11-28 00:37:16+00:00): Ти читав правила? Навігатори і машини з автопілотом їздять по GPS, а не по супутникових знімках. Знімки завжди мають спотворення в залежності від кута під яким знято, від гористості місцевості і так далі. Знімки оновляються час від часу, то що кожен раз будеш під новий знімок совати?

І так, Борислав дуже слабо промальований і затреканий. Хто тобі боронить записати більше треків по Бориславу і нанести будинки не криво (більшість з них нанесена ще в 2012)? З моєї точки зору, дуже приблизне обмальовування сірих зон навколо будинків не несе ніякої корисної інформації, ти ж ні кадастр, ні паркани не враховуєш. я автоматично можу таку халтуру зробити просто побудовую буферу навколо будинків.

І до речі, зовсім неправда, що зони забудови є всюди. Статичтично більше пробілів. Власне тому я і кажу, що ламати дороги заради "аби гарно виглядало на сірому фоні" - це якось неправильно.
MrSledge (2021-11-26 22:20:42+00:00): Field corrected is "Wikipedia", not "Wikidata".
Frans S (2021-11-26 12:41:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not allways in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not always accurate drawn. Some are oversized.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.
G: Included the shadow of a building in the mapping

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114240643
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 23:33:24+00:00): ¿Se pueden cargar coches eléctricos aquí?
MrSledge (2021-11-26 22:21:45+00:00): *"Wikipedia" field, not "Wikidata".
Frans S (2021-11-26 12:43:32+00:00): Hello
See my previous comments.
Please include the extetnions on a building also in your mappings
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114240856
user_5359 (2021-11-26 14:37:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2437089628/history! What is the meaning of the key anagrafe_delle_biblioteche_italiane ?
user_10901495 (2021-11-26 15:51:54+00:00): It is the library card on the website Anagrafe delle Biblioteche Italiane.
https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anagrafe_delle_biblioteche_italiane
Just like the facebook, wikipedia etc. keys.
I figured that makes sense to follow the same reasoning for every other website.
user_5359 (2021-11-26 16:51:13+00:00): Thanks for the interpretation. 

Please notice that the value of this new key anagrafe_delle_biblioteche_italiane  has a value https://anagrafe.iccu.sbn.it/isil/IT-MI1008 which also mention in the value ref:isil=IT-MI1008. This is a duplicate information, because it can be calculated.
if this is not an argument for you, then please document the key in the OSM Wiki.
user_10901495 (2021-11-26 17:07:57+00:00): 
Yeah I will document it, I just hadn't already looked into how to do it, but I was planning to do so ^^
Frans S (2021-11-26 12:02:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not fully in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects
E: Buildings not squared.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114240945
ovruni (2021-11-26 06:04:02+00:00): Hola andy_mt, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en sus conjuntos de cambios ha ingresado textos como "un mapa de perú" o "mapa editado", sin embargo esto no brinda suficiente información sobre los cambios realizados, como se encuentra indicado en la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
user_2066394 (2021-11-26 10:57:11+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/701698134
Baustelle rausgenommen ... da hätte man die Neubauten gleich mitnehmen können.
CaptainCrunch (2021-11-26 16:27:31+00:00): Stimmt. Ich war im "landuse-Modus" und hab es vergessen. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114270122
user_2066394 (2021-11-26 19:11:39+00:00): einwandfrei
woodpeck (2021-11-25 23:32:30+00:00): Hallo GelikaS, ich habe den Namen Deines Hotels auf "Parkhotel Ruhpolding" geändert, denn der Zusatz in Klammern, der die Angebote des Hotels beschreibt, gehört nicht auf die Karte. Ebenso ist es unnötig, dem Gebäude UND dem Hotel-POI einen Namen zu geben - es reicht, das beim POI zu tun.
kevinchen1 (2021-11-26 05:06:04+00:00): Hi GelikaS,

welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for improving the tennis facility. Based on the aerial imagery, it seems like this is a building which contains a tennis court. In that case, building=yes, leisure=sports_hall is the proper way to tag them. I have updated the map. Please let me know if you have any concerns.

Thanks
Kevin
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114241432
kevinchen1 (2021-11-26 05:07:55+00:00): Please see this page for some examples https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch?uselang=en#Indoor_tennis_court
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114241432
mariotomo (2021-11-27 12:24:17+00:00): https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-frontend/issues/329
https://github.com/sozialhelden/wheelmap-frontend/issues/327
user_5359 (2021-11-26 14:48:00+00:00): Hello! Short hint: Please use man_made=gantry instead man_man=gantry .
trapicki (2021-11-26 18:52:43+00:00): Was a type, thanks for fixing it.
olo81 (2021-11-28 20:11:38+00:00): Nie jest dobrze, te zbiorniki nie nazywają się "Łowisko Siewierz" 
łowisko należy oznaczyć jako osobny obszar, zweryfikować które z tych zbiorników należą do łowiska i objąć tym obszarem konkretne zbiorniki
opendcc (2022-02-02 08:23:45+00:00): Zwei Bushaltestellen nahe zusammen: 9284600639 und 9284600638. Scheint ein Fehler zu sein.
aweech (2021-11-26 15:50:44+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have undone this edit because I strongly suspect that none of these features are real, and, even if they were, OSM has a policy against excessive backyard mapping. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information for more information.
Frans S (2021-11-26 12:00:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
You are doing a great job, but please pay attention on these points:
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114242224
CorruptComputer (2022-03-13 03:41:13+00:00): The golf cart path you added in this changeset (way/1006314948) was a duplicate of way/9373063. In fact you even disconnected this road from its original connection, breaking routing even further. Please do not do this in the future.

I have undone this vandalism in changeset/118417668.
Frans S (2021-11-26 11:58:32+00:00): See my previous comment on your mappings. 
Please pay more attention on squaring of the mapped buildings
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114242579
Geaquinto (2022-01-04 18:07:37+00:00): Bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap, qualquer dúvida, participe do nosso grupo no Telegram (https://t.me/osmrj).

Gostaria de agradecer por suas contribuições na região da Lapa, onde inclusive sou morador. Complementei esse conjunto de alterações retirando informações supérfluas. Não é necessário indicar a Escola de Música com 3 elementos (num ponto, na área e no prédio). Apenas uma área é necessária. Isso funciona para qualquer outro ponto de interesse.

Um abraço.
Frans S (2021-11-26 11:56:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapped as 1 building.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114242691
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:40:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
ovruni (2021-11-26 04:25:33+00:00): Hola nurdiana_ui, en este conjunto de cambios se ha dividido la avenida en varios segmentos pequeños, lo mismo que las veredas. Todos estos pedazos terminan con las mismas características. Anteriormente le he escrito sobre est tipo de ediciones sin respuesta de su parte [0]. Por lo que procedo a revertir sus conjuntos de cambios. De la misma forma le vuelvo a invitar a participar en el canal de telegram de la comunidad http://t.me/osmpe 
Saludos
[0] http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12240775
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:40:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
user_5359 (2022-02-27 15:49:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006330600? Did you mean natural=tree_row?
ravali_78 (2021-11-29 09:50:32+00:00): HI WangJ024,
I have fixed the alignment of building polygon overlapping with highways.Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114353696.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114244013
Frans S (2021-11-26 13:13:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
A remark.
Please  tag a highway just with unclassified, residential etc. No further addings except when you have local knowledge.
The same with buildings. Just building=yes is sufficient.
Best regards
gscholz (2021-11-27 09:59:07+00:00): Hi 1Akshay bajare,
this changeset has added errors to the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-91.67255&lat=15.20631&zoom=16&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114246264

The added buildings also have an extremeley low quality as the do not have a rectangular shape, are by far to large and stick together where the buildings are clearly separated.

Can you please fix this and also improve your editing style?
Kind Regards
Guido
gscholz (2021-12-01 05:18:03+00:00): Hi 1Akshay bajare, 
those errors still exist. Can you please respond here?
Guido
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-11-26 05:33:50+00:00): 而且实际上它会造成渲染错误。之前OSMChina的瓦片里面这就是空白，因为不在CJK字符里面很难处理——当然这不是删掉的理由，但是我们都处理困难，对于普及用途来说难度确实很大
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-11-26 05:35:00+00:00): 最好的办法还是找一找国家有没有一些少数民族语言信息化方案和指导译名指导建议之类。这样在规范名称和正确显示字形上才有希望做好。
abakus_uploader (2021-11-26 23:31:48+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Richard (2023-08-22 17:12:32+00:00): Hi,

In this changeset you've changed the site of former bridges like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844194538 to "bridge=yes".

bridge=yes is a tag for things that are a bridge. This is not a bridge. If you try to walk over it or a drive a train over it you will drown.

Could you please not use bridge=yes for things where bridge not equals yes. Thank you very much.
eggie (2021-11-26 08:17:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...  motor_vehicle=no hoeft niet op fietspaden. Het is default. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
TomPar (2023-12-18 21:33:06+00:00): Hello.  I'm mapping more in Death Valley lately.  I'm curious about your switch from track to highway=unclassified on the Saline Valley Road.  Are there any OSM Death Valley working group conventions or something like that?

On the NPS AGOL Roads dataset, Saline Valley Road, and roads around it  like Hunter Mountain Road, have a NPS road class (RDCLASS) of 4WD.  I propose that RDCLASS=4WD maps to highway=track in OSM and the NPS RDCLASS=local maps to highway=unclassified (like Racetrack Valley Road) for consistency.  Thoughts on any of this? Thanks!

(BTW, I'm active on the OSM Slack if you're inclined to collab there.)
BryanOSullivan (2023-12-22 21:07:40+00:00): Hi Tom, I don't think highway=track is a good fit for significant roads like Saline Valley Road, as this one is wide and usually in good repair. highway=track tends to be a better fit for narrower less maintained roads.
AkuAnakTimur (2021-11-26 08:24:10+00:00): Please DO read this prior changeset discussion

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111210625
Vanern (2021-11-29 22:05:13+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur. Thank you for pointing out the earlier changeset discussion on this subject. I will avoid these types of unnecessary splits around painted markings in the future. Thanks again.
Jrdn1788 (2021-11-26 06:54:13+00:00): The final sentance of my modification description got cut off.. It should be: "It is constructed mainly for access by foot, but you can also decend it with your bike unmounted."
eggie (2021-11-26 08:25:35+00:00): Oke..  
Een trap geef je aan met highway=steps
Wanneer er een gootje langsloopt kun je dat ook aangeven met 
ramp:bicycle=yes
en bicycle=dismount  (dus even dat =yes veranderen) 

... access = no is bijna altijd fout. Hier verboden toegang?
motor_vehicle=no hoeft niet

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114249210

sac_scale=hiking hoort hier denk ik niet. 
Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-26 08:33:52+00:00): De zuidelijke trap iets  aangepast als voorbeeld
mapse
eggie
Frans S (2021-11-26 11:54:47+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of this building and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You includes to much nodes here. A rectangular buildings can be mapped with 4 nodes. A building with an extention with 6 nodes.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114249427
syntex (2021-12-15 16:32:23+00:00): Coraz dziwniejsze te nazwy
amadvance (2021-11-28 16:54:47+00:00): Ciao Morsi,

Vedo che stai modificando alcuni edifici in Val Brembilla. 

Io li avevo sistemati tutti usando la "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta". Che mappa usi tu ? La PCN ?

Per me è meglio la Esri, in quanto è molto meglio definita. La forma e dimensione degli edifici è sicuramente più corretta rispetto alla PCN.

Le prossime ortofoto Agea del 2022 dovrebbero avere una licenza libera e dovrebbe essere più semplice rivedere gli edifici se si mantiene la Esri.

Ciao,
Andrea
morsi (2021-11-29 07:34:38+00:00): Ciao Andrea
in realtà per gli edifici uso la Lombardia - CTR DBT, in scala di grigi, che mi sembra essere molto precisa e i contorni degli edifici sono netti. Oltre tutto vi sono anche indicati nu sacco di toponimi che spesso mancano sulla mappa.
Fammi sapere se trovi delle criticità.

Ciao 
Simone
borovac (2021-11-26 07:43:01+00:00): Adding missing roads in Uruguay using MapWithAI detections #MSFTOpenMaps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114251109
DthMaps (2021-11-27 02:33:45+00:00): Ziet er goed uit. Het betreft slechts een lift die je van de begane grond naar de 1e verdieping (parkeerdek van de ambulance's) brengt. Geen parkeergarage o.i.d. dus ;-)
conifermapper (2021-11-27 09:58:38+00:00): You seem to have broken the relation for the grass multipolygon named Awbridge House Farm ,also why did you change the multipolygon to a site?There is nothing wrong with naming multipolygons as opposed to individual meadow areas.
conifermapper (2021-11-27 10:00:13+00:00): The OSM wiki says that type=site is not very well supported - 'multipolygons are more intuitive and enjoy widespread software support'
BCNorwich (2021-11-28 08:34:11+00:00): Merely corrections to a few of the polygons that were highlighted, mostly self-intersecting ways.
osmviborg (2021-11-26 09:27:18+00:00): Vejstykket var tagget 'access=private'. Så hvad var problemet?
eggie (2021-11-26 08:44:26+00:00): Hoi.. Ja dat zuidelijke pad heb ik aangepast.
Wanneer je echt het gootje kunt nemen dan niet discouraged gebruiken, maar dismount.
Dat routeert al iets minder van harte.
De trap is eigenlijk korter. Je zou dus op twee plaatsen de trap kunnen splitsen. en de toevoerstukken veranderen in path.
of ramp:bicycle=dismount werkt.. even geen idee.
Op fietskaarten (OFM)  zie je bij bicycle=dismount een symbool van een afstappende fietser.
eggie (2021-11-26 08:45:28+00:00): .. aanvulling.. Ook access=yes als regel verwijderen. Dat overruled andere beperkingen soms. Beter niet gebruiken.
ralley (2021-11-26 20:01:10+00:00): Welcome to SOM and thanks for your edits.  Please use changeset comments to describe your changes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments  Also please use full names rather than abbreviations like "St" for Saint: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114252940
cjhond (2021-11-28 19:17:12+00:00): Thanks and apologies for process errors as a total beginner and still learning. Did not know about changeset and comments.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114252940
Frans S (2021-11-26 11:44:09+00:00): Hello.  In addition to my previous message,
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114253148