piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
G1asshouse (2022-01-14 18:01:02+00:00): I take you at your word that this was not employment related for any 3rd party. In that regard, I’d like to apologize to you. I do not wish to impugn your character or that of the company you work for. Not as a defense but simply as an explanation. I clearly inferred incorrectly a potential motivation which was from your statement, “on a data consumer for this scheme”. I better understand what you were saying. Again, my apologizes.

I wish you hadn’t named the company you work for and I employ you to not name your employer. They were both referenced to better frame my concerns. I did not name either because I have no reason to believe your actions are anything other than your own.
Mundilfari (2022-02-24 05:09:36+00:00): Hello,
what's the source for the Bucky's convenience store on IL59 and 75th (node 117099900) rebranding to MobilMart? The signage on the store says Bucky's (and it's been like that for at least several years).
tastrax (2022-01-03 01:38:52+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
kurisubrooks (2022-01-03 01:51:28+00:00): Hey, thanks for fixing that. I wasn't aware, but I now know for the future :)
Thanks mate
tastrax (2022-01-03 02:35:08+00:00): No problems, I just noticed you were a relatively new mapper so it’s good to get as many tips as possible when starting out. Also spotted you on discord. Cheers
kurisubrooks (2022-01-03 02:43:35+00:00): Yeah! I really appreciate it. The folks in the #oceania channel on Discord have been a tremendous help :)
mueschel (2021-12-29 11:51:38+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - there are many ways with French tags like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284301220

Could you check this and correct the keys?

Thanks!
Amr@Gis (2021-12-29 16:15:14+00:00): Hallo muschel,
Thank you for your comment, I did see these tags too and those came from this user "https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/janiourjemna" and I did not understand these French tags, so I just restored the old tags he deleted like highway.
Amr@Gis
B.R
mueschel (2021-12-29 16:25:23+00:00): Oh sorry, I have to admit I didn't look into the history...
There seem to be more people involved, e.g.
kawtharfkih, formation1, matmati1978

Could you leave them a comment? That might help more than me writing in English...
Amr@Gis (2021-12-30 07:52:32+00:00): Hello muschel,
Never mind about that, Sure I will lift some comments to those users
Regards
Amr@Gis
artem95vlasovets (2021-12-31 07:53:17+00:00): Hi lockdownguy! Is 840-39 a road number? If yes, then there is already a tag for road numbers. It is the ref tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115507834
user_11418917 (2021-12-31 14:58:16+00:00): Hello, artem95vlasovets.  
Its not just a road number, it’s the actual street name.   
Iraq have different address style from the world, for example the world would have something like “123 main st. , Dallas, Texas, 75222. United States”
While in Iraq our addresses is like: 
“Iraq, Baghdad, District 300, Alley 15, house 26” residential roads don’t have text names. 
The Iraqi community used to add just the Alley number/name in the name tag of the street then it became a total mess! Because tens of districts in the same city have the exact alley number for example “12” so the Iraqi community agreed to put the name tag as “District-Alley” so each road have it’s unique name that’s easily identifiable and searchable. This method is used in all cities that the community adding road names, like Erbil, Baghdad, etc.  
best regards.
artem95vlasovets (2021-12-31 17:13:37+00:00): Thanks for the explanation, lockdownguy
bxl-forever (2022-01-25 19:19:22+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding a building.

Do not forget to fill associatedStreet relations when they exist.  We use them a lot in Brussels, to group all the houses from the same street (no need to type the same postcode or municipality name on every house, for instance).

Also, you might be interested to name your changesets in a more useful way for everyone, instead of "observations from field and urbis" all the time.

Happy mapping.
archie (2021-12-29 10:11:38+00:00): Hej, vad innebär de där "smal fixes"?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-02-16 21:56:48+00:00): Why did you add a service=driveway to Pilvetee? It's a small street which gives access to other smaller roads. The driveway value is for smaller roads, which are usually not streets and usually connecting to one building. I'm not even sure highway=service should be used.

If you meant to tag a street with a living street sign, then highway=living_street should have been used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
highflyer74 (2021-12-29 13:36:17+00:00): Moin und danke für das Hinzufügen des Kindergartens!

Falls Du noch mehr Kindergärten hinzufügst, nimm dazu am besten das Tag amenity=kindergarten statt amenity=childcare. Mehr dazu hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=childcare?uselang=de

Viele Grüße!
Buraddo (2021-12-29 10:28:02+00:00): Salut, mai este valabilă nota legată de trecerea prin pârâu? Văd că ai marcat drumul drept asfaltat
Florin Tuica (2021-12-29 10:49:06+00:00): Este in continuare valabila nota. In rest este asfalt impecabil.
skyper (2023-02-01 15:33:38+00:00): Hallo wegavision,
warum hast Du den `lanes:forward` und `lanes:backward` bei folgenden Linien gelöscht? Das war doch nicht falsch und ich finde diese Tags sinnvoll, wenn andere :lanes-Tags vorhanden sind.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/911295023
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/911295025
Fragende Grüße,
skyper
wegavision (2023-02-01 15:46:10+00:00): Das ist ein Jahr her, ich kann mich nicht mehr erinnern. Wenn es da nur einen lane gibt, dann sind das lanes, sondern unnötig.
skyper (2023-02-09 16:18:23+00:00): Auch dieser CS hat die richtig eingetragenen `sidewalk:right=separate` und mit falschen und jetzt doppelten `sidewalk=right` überschrieben, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28413895
Bitte geht, auch wenn das ein Jahr her ist, Deine Änderungen nochmal durch und korrigiere das. Danke.
jmilot (2022-03-03 21:01:00+00:00): Hi,

When adding sidewalks, can you also make sure to add every crossings (marked and unmarked) please? Otherwise this break pedestrian router as they have no way to cross roads. 

Thanks in advance.
user_5359 (2022-01-02 07:20:49+00:00): Hello! Please explain the meaning of the key flour_fortified.
Frans S (2021-12-29 10:52:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115511889
Famlam (2022-01-19 12:16:09+00:00): Ik snap je logica, maar eigenlijk is het niet de bedoeling de name tag te gebruiken voor de beschrijving (en tagging voor de renderer is ook niet toegestaan; immers, deze kaart is maar één van de vele gebruikers van openstreetmap data).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_Practice

Meestal kun je de tag "description" het beste gebruiken in dat geval (het verschil tussen note=* en description=* is dat de laatste bedoeld is voor de eindgebruikers en de eerste puur voor OSM-onderhouddoelen). 

Dit heeft soms als consequentie dat het niet onmiddellijk zichtbaar is op de kaart wat er gewonnen wordt, omdat het per "kaartleverancier" verschilt wat - en tot in welke details - zij dingen zichtbaar maken. Om maar een extreem voorbeeld te noemen: de buswegen in Nijmegen zijn niet zichtbaar omdat deze kaartleverancier dat nog niet ondersteunt. Echter, voldoende andere (navigatie- en rendering)software ondersteunt dit wel.
Famlam (2022-01-19 12:18:38+00:00): (Puur ter informatie overigens, wat mij betreft kun je het nu laten staan; dit is zeker niet de enige situatie in Nederland waar naam gebruikt wordt voor een beschrijving, zie bijvoorbeeld https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218533092 )
Walter-NL (2022-01-19 20:09:48+00:00): Dank voor je commentaar Famlam; het was expliciet niet de bedoeling "to tag for the renderer", maar "industrial site" is een aanduiding die het fysieke landschap volstrekt onbevredigend beschrijft; vandaar ook mijn uitgebreider toelichting. Uiteindelijk is het wel de bedoeling dat een kaart (gedrukt of scherm) voldoende informatief is zonder dat de gebruiker daarvoor de achterliggende data-sets moet raadplegen. Jouw voorbeeld van de busbanen staat model voor de beperkingen.  Ik ben blij met je hint voor het gebruik van description en ga dat bij een volgende gelegenheid  zo doen. Wel in de hoop dat het de aard van het landgebruik op de kaart zichtbaar maakt. Anders zou er een specifieker symbool beschikbaar moeten komen voor dit soort terreinen (?)
Famlam (2022-01-19 20:49:48+00:00): Helaas is er (nog) geen specifiekere tag dan "landuse=quarry" + "resource=*" voor dit type locaties.
De standaardrenderer (Carto) is helaas extreem conservatief in het toevoegen van nieuwe items, is de ervaring...
Walter-NL (2022-01-19 22:35:24+00:00): Ach, als we een beetje uitzoomen is wordt dit soort vraagstukken  ondergeschikt aan de werkelijk belangrijke rol die OSM op allerlei gebieden vervult. Wat het al te gemakkelijk toevoegen van nieuwe symbolen betreft: de aanwas van zielloze emoji's op de Unicode-lijst laten zien waar dat kan eindigen........
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 15:54:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9375954671/history has shop = spare_parts that was added in this edit
shop=spare_parts ? What kind of spare parts? Of car parts? specialized machinery? sailing boats? train models? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for possible values - though maybe new one is needed)
Frans S (2021-12-29 11:20:59+00:00): Hello. thanks for mapping here.
See my comment on another changeset.
On the achavi page, click on the link you can see what I had to change on your mappings. See the legend for more info
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115513593
Please check also if a shadow is visible next to a building. It proofs it is above ground level. You mapped also a piece of land as a building.
Best regards and keep mapping
Urbis13 (2023-05-06 21:06:58+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che nella modifica il limite di velocità lungo viale Fulvio Testi è stato cambiato da 70 a 30 km/h. Non ho modo di verificare personalmente ma visto il tipo di strada mi pare altamente improbabile ? Per inciso le foto stradali presenti disponibili per OSM riportano il limite di 70
dieterdreist (2022-01-14 09:27:52+00:00): Hi, in this changeset you have removed a lot of tags from the vatican city, namely ISO3166-1:alpha2, contry_code_fips, and all official name tags (15), and introduced a very long bilingual value in the name tag, all with the comment "fixed tags vatican city". You also changed the place label from town to city, with no discussion anywhere, this is a major breaking change for the area and a "city" classification seems questionable for the vatican (it is for the first time in 13 years and 82 object versions that this value is set for place). Can you please explain your motivation and reasoning for this edit?

Thank you,
Martin
dieterdreist (2022-01-14 09:37:52+00:00): forgot it, please also explain the deletion of the ordine di Sant'Agostino: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8709827024/history
dieterdreist (2022-01-14 09:41:45+00:00): After looking deeper into this edit I can see that removing country information from the place=city/town makes sense. I am unsure about the bilingual name, but would think this should be discussed with the Italian community. The classification change from town to city has so much impact that I reverted it for the moment. Of course, everything is possible, but I would expect a discussion before making a breaking move like this.
user_10901495 (2022-01-14 11:32:12+00:00): I changed name to including the latin and italian name because this nation has these languages as official languages, as it is customary in nations or territories with more than one official language.
I deleted the city_block because it didn't make sense, as there is already this relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11989610 that describes the same thing; the tags from the node can be added to the relation.
My reasoning in changing Vatican City to city is this:
1. to follow the wiki page description of city (Use the place=city tag to identify the largest settlement or settlements within a territory)
2. It is a CITY-state (this is a rather weak argument, I admit)
3. It has city in the name
If these points are not valid I suggest tagging it as a village instead of a town, because it hasn't the number of inhabitants of a town.
The options in my opinion are these: tagging it as city because it's a national capital after all, or tagging it as a village because it has a low number of residents.
dieterdreist (2022-01-14 13:55:09+00:00): agostini:
the issue I see with the Agostini is that you did not delete place=city_block, you deleted the whole object with all translations and the wikidata link and wp link (which both are about the Augustine Order and not about this facility, agreed, but could have been retagged to wikidata:operator or something alike). I am not sure the relation is about the same thing, because one way tagged place=city_block, the other is just a landuse with a name. From looking at this, eventually amenity=monastery with community tags would be a better representation. Anyway, both objects are far from perfect, there are even religion and denomination tags missing. Removing the node in favor of the area is fine, but the tags should be transferred.

vatican city
Thinking about it, maybe neither town, nor city are fitting, because the vatican is actually just a part of Rome (not of Comune di Roma or Roma Capitale, but of Rome as a settlement), it is not a town on its own. On the other hand, the situation is so exceptional (a country as part of a city) that developing specific tagging is maybe not suitable either. I'm quite sure the number of inhabitants is not the most important property to look at, if you wanted to classify the Vatican. Generally we also look at functional features, is there an airport, a train station, a university, banks and offices, monuments, museums, theatres, cinemas, industry, supermarkets, shops, ...
The vatican has some of them (even world class), while others are completely missing. Functionally, it is completely dependent on Rome.
user_10901495 (2022-01-14 15:05:09+00:00): It can be tagged as a neighbourhood (?)
dieterdreist (2022-01-14 15:29:13+00:00): if we decide to remove any of city/town/village it could get place=suburb IMHO, while it is very small by inhabitants, it is very important on a global scale, and I guess it is also important regarding for example economical indicators like the GDP (compared to other suburbs). It used to be a place=country tag on this node, which is undoubtfully correct as well, maybe it is an option?
user_10901495 (2022-01-14 21:36:08+00:00): I would opt for suburb.
dieterdreist (2022-01-15 15:36:07+00:00): I am tending towards place=country, or is there already another node with the tag?
dieterdreist (2022-01-15 15:38:40+00:00): regarding the double naming, it is an exceptional case here as well, because Latin is the official language but it is a dead language, no mother tongues here. I’m unsure and would discuss it on the tagging mailing list.
user_10901495 (2022-01-15 16:59:16+00:00): But this is not an argument since previously the name was latin only. I added italian because also italian is official language there.
dieterdreist (2022-01-16 00:12:51+00:00): Have a look: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/424311883
before your edit, the name of this node was Italian only, since 2016-08. Before this, it was Latin since 2013, before it was Italian.
user_10901495 (2022-01-16 11:26:08+00:00): I was talking about the relation. If there was a language on the node and another on the relation is worse. I fixed these inconsistencies, you say that the node had a history of changing back and forth between latin and italian, if we have both there is no longer reason to change the name.
dieterdreist (2022-01-17 08:31:03+00:00): I did not say "changing back and forth", it only changed a few times in 13 years. Of ~90 edits, the node name was changed 3-4 times as was the relation name. Looking at the relation 36989, it started with an English name in 2008, which became Italian in 2009 and latin in 2010, then again Italian from 2016 to 2018. Admittedly, I care less for the "name" tag of the relation, because rendering is done from the node. There is no automatism to put 2 names in "name" just because both names are official, indeed the official name should go in "official_name". Double naming in "name" is a last resort if it is required to respect a language minority or for equally important languages to have both. Putting a very long name in the "name" tag is counter productive because it will either lead to no name at all being displayed, or other important names being omitted because of the occupied space.
Jojo4u (2022-02-05 17:53:59+00:00): Hi, coincidentally I noticed that Vatican City ist the only country in the world which has place=country not as a node but on the border relation. I'd like to have it on a node in order to have a consistent use worldwide. Country nodes are a bit of legacy tagging, but they are still here (advanced rendereres use boundaries for country rendering).

The place=country could be the only place node, but there is also the convention to have a place node for the capital. Vatican City is one of the edge cases. (compre to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:capital). A place=country node with capital=yes does make much sense, a country can't be it's own capital. As you already converged on suburb there should bw two nodes: place=country and place=suburb+capital=2.
Jojo4u (2022-02-05 18:08:57+00:00): Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117055531
Place=country https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9481710122
Place=suburb https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/424311883
Removed place=country from border relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/36989.
BCNorwich (2021-12-29 18:25:55+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the tags of both sections of Rookery Chase and the crossfield bridleway. This is to meet OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.
trial (2021-12-30 11:45:42+00:00): Bonjour, sans doute une erreur dans la dénomination de l'opérateur ;-).
Bien vu le recollage des références !
somix (2021-12-29 11:39:05+00:00): здравствуйте, если нет улицы, то оставляйте поле пустым. в название города не нужно писать деревня, город и т.п.
cquest (2021-12-29 11:40:37+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai corrigé les contributions faites sur ce bâtiment car elles ne respectaient pas les tags à utiliser pour ces profession paramédicales.
Ce ne sont pas des hôpitaux, et les noms des professionnels n'ont pas à figurer dans la base qui n'est pas un annuaire publicitaire.

Les corrections sont ici: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115514592

Merci de respecter les tags prévus par le wiki et de ne pas "tagguer pour le rendu".
maraf24 (2022-01-03 19:27:03+00:00): To nie jest obwodnica.
user_5359 (2021-12-29 14:03:43+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ich habe Dein Gebäude (das in einem Gebäude platziert war) als Knoten dargestellt.
FraukeLeo (2022-01-01 16:50:05+00:00): Hallo Smotti, du hast die zwei Enden der Mögglinger Umgehungsstraße auf die letzten paar Meter von highway=trunk auf highway=trunk_link geändert. Welchen Sinn hat das? Hier geht einfach ein primary in einen trunk über und umgekehrt.
aceman444 (2024-06-24 22:39:11+00:00): Zase bez zdroja a bez zmysluplneho popisu sad zmien

Aky je zdroj na penzion https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9376040407 ? 
A co znamena guest_house=pension? Nevidim taku hodnotu zdokumentovanu na
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aguest_house .
julcnx (2021-12-30 03:03:04+00:00): Thank your for your contribution!

As a new mapper, please kindly refer to the Thailand wiki page for detailed guidelines and recommendations (e.g. imagery and road classifications)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand

How to choose a good changeset name:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

If you have any questions, feel free to contact the Thailand forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=46
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115515988
gbragaalves (2021-12-29 12:31:47+00:00): Tag Wikipédia usada refere-se ao local incorreto (bairro em São Paulo, SP). Favor revisar edição.
magrej (2021-12-29 14:21:43+00:00): Hi gbragaalves,

Thank you for pointing this out, the tags are removed and added to the correct position.

Best,
magrej
eggie (2021-12-29 13:22:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback..  Beste lastig in het begin.
Het gras oost van nr 71 zit nu geplakt aan je pad.
Het pas heb je op slot gezet met access=no
Dat betekent Verboden Toegang. Staat er zo'n bord? Het zal daardoor ook nauwelijks te zien zijn op de kaart, want het pad doet er niet toe.
Editor iD vraagt of je van alles invult, maar dat hoeft niet.
Je hebt het getagd als fietspad.. Staat er een bord fietspad. Zoniet dan highway=path gebruiken.
Op een path is het soms wel handig om foot en bicycle=yes te taggen voor de duidelijkheid. Op een fietspad is dat niet nodig.
...access=yes moet weg.. 



Je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115516701


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-29 13:24:25+00:00): Verder loopt je fietspad??  deels door de Slinge.
eggie (2021-12-29 13:29:32+00:00): Zo te zien is het een highway=track met tracktype=grade3 en zeker geen fietspad.. Dus kijk nog even hoe je het tagt.
eggie (2021-12-29 13:56:39+00:00): 

Zelf denk ik highway=track
tracktype=grade4

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:Map_Features:tracktype

en ik denk niet dat hier langs het hek een 'verhard' fietspad loopt
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.942764349482&lng=6.6267462764249&z=17&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=221002016104021&focus=photo&x=0.5097692531138862&y=0.4430602927829445&zoom=0

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-29 15:38:10+00:00): Het 'fietspad' heb ik aangepast aan bovenstaande tagging. 
Mocht er echt een bord fietspad zijn gekomen .. laat dat dan even weten.
MVG
eggie
fayor (2021-12-29 15:21:51+00:00): Ciao, il numero c'era già, posto sulla strada di accesso https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9025706829
Non è necessario aggiungere la città
G_P_J (2022-01-05 20:33:00+00:00): Cześć, 
wielka prośba - nie zmieniaj nazw ulic w adresach edytowanych kościołów/plebanii. Konwencja OSM zakłada rozwijanie nazw ulic do imienia i nazwiska. Nazwy w adresach powinny być zgodne z nazwami ulic.
Pozdrawiam,
Piotr