piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Grant Humphries (2015-03-23 22:59:24+00:00): Hi Paul,

I've added the streets that run over the Tilikum Crossing back in as separate features from this rail lines as I could not find documentation of a firm convention either way for this and having them separated is critical to what we do at TriMet.  Do you have any issues with this?

Also I can see that the removal of the 'name' and 'ref' tags on the MAX lines is in line with the documentation from the wiki, but my issue with it is that I was relying on those and you haven't added the data in the 'correct' format (as relations), so I can no longer consume that data in any format at this time.

Last, I understand that you're under no obligation to do so, but as a courtesy, would you be willing to confer with me when you're preparing to make major edits to TriMet infrastructure?  I don't mean to infringe contributions (or take the fun out of it), but ensuring those features are accurate is important to the way we use the data and I may be able to provide resources that haven't been distributed to the public.
Baloo Uriza (2015-03-25 11:17:02+00:00): Where the way is one lane wide and the rails are congruent with the way, it shouldn't be a problem to have the tags for both to share a single way.  I'm afraid I'm not familiar with the routes in the TriMet system as they lay at the moment.
woodpeck (2015-03-22 20:49:13+00:00): How did you check that?
mueschel (2015-03-22 21:15:33+00:00): On one way I just put a fixme, one is a roundabout, one is part of a short split lane on a junction and one already contained the oneway key. No guessing involved.
scai (2015-03-22 10:09:10+00:00): Bitte nochmal überprüfen. Der eine Weg (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141956054) hat das tag "name=no", da ist dir sicher ein Fehler unterlaufen :)
Peilscheibe (2015-03-24 16:22:48+00:00): Informationen, die andere zusmmengetragen haben, einfach mal kommentarlos und ohne Begründung aus der Datenbank zu löschen, geht gar nicht. Ich bitte dringend darum das künftig zu unterlassen. Changeset wird revertiert.
emacsen (2015-03-21 19:48:33+00:00): Is this import following the Import Guidelines?

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

I don't recall seeing it discussed on the import list. Can you point me to it?

If not, it needs to stop and be reverted.
emacsen (2015-03-21 19:50:50+00:00): I found it on the list. It'd be good to link to the wiki page on this import in the changesets.
AgusQui (2015-03-29 05:33:02+00:00): ¿Porqué borraste el edificio de la terminal del 203?
kartler175 (2015-05-20 16:23:54+00:00): Bitte überprüfen und berichtigen:

http://keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch60=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=47.54572&lon=7.61226&zoom=15&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C298
t_ja (2015-03-22 18:00:12+00:00): Ahoj,
pár pripomienok k tvojim úpravám:
1) povrch "Lesná_cesta" neexistuje, pozri si povolené hodnoty na wiki.osm.org
2) nakreslená čiara bez akéhokoľvek otagovania ako keby neexistovala, pridaj preto správne tagy (tipujem, že to má byť highway=track)
3) pridaný zákaz odbočenia vľavo je úplne zbytočný, keďže autá nemajú prístup na highway=cycleway, a pre cyklistov ten zákaz asi neplatí :)
4) footway sa používa v obývaných oblastiach, mimo sa používa path, viac nájdeš opäť na wiki.
Prosím poopravuj si to všetko.
Vďaka vopred.
*Martin* (2015-03-22 20:18:20+00:00): Predtym, ako sa novacik pusti do mapovania, by malo byt pre neho povinne pozriet si ako su uz podobne veci zaznacene v mape a precitat si k veciam co ide mapovat na wiki.osm.org. Inac je to ako si prvy krat sadnut za volant a ist jazdit po meste. V pripade otazok pis na forum slovenskej OSM komunity osm_sk@googlegroups.com. Dakujem.
*Martin* (2015-03-22 20:21:05+00:00): A este ta poprosim "pridat spravu" ku kazdej zmene co ulozis. Dakujem.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-30 05:12:56+00:00): Could we discuss sanitary_dump_station:chemical_toilet before it's used too much.  What does it mean?
gmbo (2015-03-30 08:31:20+00:00): This Dumping Station is only for chemical toilet cassettes
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-30 16:46:42+00:00): Could we use sanitary_dump_station:cassette=yes and sanitary_dump_station:gravity=no then.  But mostly get it documented on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsanitary_dump_station talk page.
gmbo (2015-04-03 13:31:02+00:00): I use chemical toilet in accordance with waste=xxx, since the new key so replaced waste disposal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waste
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-03 16:49:10+00:00): The "gravity" style dump also takes chemical toilet waste.  The concern is that "chemical_toilet" may be confused with a toilet for a human, rather than a place to dump contents of a holding tank.
gmbo (2015-04-03 19:30:22+00:00): In my opinion, there should be no confusion, because it is so is a dump station.
The method of disposal is different.
In Germany there is a distinction whether it was collected with or without chemicals.
The cassette are the same.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-03 22:05:48+00:00): I did not know there was a difference in Germany.

In the USA, Mexico, Canada the only difference is the shape and size of the hole.

How are chemical and no-chemical tagged in Germany?

What tag would you recommend for http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsanitary_dump_station ?

--------------------------------------------

In the USA a cassette is not welcome at a toilet for a human user.
gmbo (2015-04-04 05:01:34+00:00): In Germany is it also not welcome at a toilet for human user.
-------------------------------------
But there is a difference in the disposal stations, because it depends on the type of treatment plant if there can be disposed of chemicals.
Therefore, although there are disposal for cassettes but it may be used where no chemistry.
Therefore, I would describe the simple only with gravity, but may be also used in the chemistry with chemical toilet.

Then there's disposal at no toilets must be disposed of. where only the rinse water must be drained.(gray_water)
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-04 05:57:36+00:00): Könnten schreiben sie dass auf Deutsch?
gmbo (2015-04-04 06:20:52+00:00): Es gibt hier in Europa einige Entsorgungsstationen die nicht über eine Möglichkeit zum entsorgen von Chemikalien in den Kassetten geeignet sind, da die nicht an eine dafür vorgesehene Kläranlage angeschlossen sind.
Solche  würde ich nur mit gravity taggen.
Die meisten Entsorgungsstationen sind hier aber auch für Chemie in den Toiletten geeignet. 
Diese tagge ich mit chemical_toilet.
Dann gibt es wiederum Stationen an denen gar keine Toiletten entsorgt werden dürfen sondern nur das Grauwasser vom Waschen und Geschirrspülen.
Für das Grauwasser gibt es in den meisten Fällen eigene Abflüsse.
gmbo (2015-04-04 07:50:09+00:00): ich habe mal ein paar Bilder hochgeladen.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Sanitary_dump_station
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-04 18:05:37+00:00): Danke.

In the UK those are called "Elsan points".

See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dsanitary_dump_station

---
My German is poor, but my son is fluent.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-04 18:11:04+00:00): In the USA "gravity" accepts blackwater with chemicals and grey water both:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YJxcWxveJI

For cassette systems see:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gs613XaqGwA
gmbo (2015-04-04 19:41:47+00:00): The cassette systems are the same as in europe
but we cannot ensure that all gravity damping  stations accept chemical toilet.
How can we distinguish?

die Entsorgungsstation ist auch hier in Europa üblich,
im Normalfall können Cassetten mit chemischen Zusätzen dort entsorgt werden.
Aber an wenigen Orten darf keine Chemie verwendet werden, da entweder keine oder eine zu einfache Kläranlage vorhanden ist.
casette als tag scheidet aus, da sie auch ohne Chemie benutzt werden kann.
moglich wäre gravity als grundsätzlich  chemical toilet=yes zu setzen und zu beschreiben.
Dann müsste aber im umgekehrten Fall immer no chemical toilet getaggt werden.
geri-oc (2019-05-07 08:49:02+00:00): Bitte einmal nach dem notes schauen: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1758732#map=18/51.65878/7.63463&layers=N
eventuell auch im Forum: 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=747934#p747934
Gruß Gerd
Firefishy (2015-03-21 22:43:38+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap South Africa. Very nice addition. Best to not use abbreviations. Use Avenue instead of Ave etc.
Firefishy (2015-03-21 23:05:24+00:00): Fixed them up: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29646301
frosm (2019-08-22 13:05:35+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135019855
qu'est-ce que c'est exactement ? c'est renseigné comme un confiseur qui ne vend que des pâtisseries... donc c'est une pâtisserie ?
t_ja (2015-03-22 17:46:20+00:00): Ahoj,
pridal si síce názov, ale neurčil si, o čo sa jedná. Tipujem, že sa jedná o názov lokality (t.j. place=locality). Prosím doplň chýbajúce informácie.
Vďaka.
*Martin* (2015-03-22 20:20:09+00:00): Prosim tiez pritavaj popis ku kazdej zmene co spravis (v tom nesikovnom editore iD sa to vtipne vola ze "pripojut spravu"). V pripade otazok pis na forum slovenskej OSM komunity osm_sk@googlegroups.com. Dakujem.
t_ja (2015-03-22 17:49:32+00:00): Rovnaká chyba ako pri https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29645013
FTA (2015-03-21 21:56:51+00:00): Actually it's the relation's label node, not admin_center. Apologies for the incorrect changeset label.
SomeoneElse (2015-03-23 11:56:36+00:00): Did you discuss this deletion anywhere with the local OSM community before doing it?  If so, where?
putzich (2015-03-23 20:13:18+00:00): No. didn't
No use for redundancy.
Realy great are highwys who are members of 3 relations
or enormous gaps
or highways of different names in one relation etc.

I don't discuss remove nonsense when adding nonsense wasn't discussed too
SomeoneElse (2015-03-23 22:25:19+00:00): OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project.  It's important that we all work together to create the best map that we can.  If we didn't all work together I'd only have a map of some roads and footpaths where I live, you'd only have a map of what you've personally surveyed where you live, and so on.

It's important to communicate changes for another reason, too - if people are creating data that is in some way "invalid" (and that's still open to discussion here, I think) then it's important that the people who are doing that know that they're doing it so that they can do it differently in the future.  

Yet another reason why it's important to discuss changes such as this is that people do use this data - they create maps (online and offline) from it, they extract datasets from it and they use it in other ways too.  If you're changing the data that's stored they won't know why, when they extract something today they get different results to yesterday.

I've mentioned this changeset on the talk-it list ( https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2015-March/047202.html ) - I'd suggest that you engage with the Italian community either there on that list or here in this changeset discussion.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group.
putzich (2015-03-24 05:56:28+00:00): text blocks are nice. 
reason i changed data is mentioned in the change set comment.
dieterdreist (2015-03-26 10:43:21+00:00): I am for reverting this changeset: 

1. The user has very likely violated the community guidelines for automated / semitautomated changes (not looked individually at every object he deleted). 

2. Deleting this amount of data should generally not be decided unilaterally on an individual basis, even more if it happens far from the home of the user, and when the user is not able to communicate with the local community (user speaks no Italian and has problems with English). This shows some disrespect towards the local mapping community.
dieterdreist (2015-03-26 10:48:01+00:00): Also the user is either actively trying to hide his identity and other pseudonyms within the OSM community or he is a genius and really a new user who has found out just 2 days after signing up, that this particular relation type is useless and how to delete them in a huge area. I tend to believe the former and think that the reason for hiding behind a newly created user is that he is well aware of the controversity of his edit.
putzich (2015-03-26 17:55:08+00:00): I look for every single object i was edited. have fun restoring nonsense

It seems also you not speak english well too. I needed point you to here tre times until you found the discussione.

When you self say the data is useless, so why you restore?
Jojo4u (2015-03-31 11:39:28+00:00): There is another "genius" user doing automated deletions of relations.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/l%C3%B6schomat/history

Diskussion by affected user here: forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=494432
woodpeck (2015-03-22 20:54:17+00:00): Is your Chinese good enough to make sure your reasoning is correct?
mueschel (2015-03-22 21:20:19+00:00): The street in China: simple comparison to the available name:en.
The street in Japan: google translator
All others seemed obvious.
joakimfors (2015-03-22 20:55:18+00:00): Tips: Om byggnader som rivits fortfarande syns på Bing så kan det vara smart att istället för att ta bort objektet i OSM så ändrar man "building=yes" till t.ex. "historic:building=yes" och kanske även sätter till "note=Demolished". Annars kan det hända att någon "fotöljmappare" kommer och ritar in byggnaden igen från Bings flygfoton.
joakimfors (2015-03-22 20:55:58+00:00): … fåtölj (stavar som en kratta idag)
YraFyra (2015-03-22 21:12:00+00:00): Tack för tipset. Jag har sett det på något ställe bortåt Linero.
Ska vi reverta och sätta taggarna eller är det ok som det är?
joakimfors (2015-03-22 22:57:24+00:00): Är OK som det är. Gissar det ska börja byggas där ganska snart så då kommer man att fylla på med annat som avskräcker icke-lokala mappare att rita tillbaka huset. Tänkte mer bara ge tipset då det kan vara bra att ta till i framtiden. :)
tyr_asd (2015-03-22 21:39:58+00:00): Hm. Ich finde das neue Tagging der alten Kaltererstraße nicht so gelungen. Z.B. der Übergang zwischen track und cycleway, obwohl die Charakteristik des Wegs sich gar nicht ändert. Rechtlich ist die Straße wohl eher etwas wie ein highway=service mit vehicle=destination und bicycle=yes. Sie wird aber meiner Erfahrung nach in der Praxis von der Bevölkerung deutlich mehr wie eine Art "Fußgängerzone" genutzt (spielende Kinder, Spaziergänger, usw. auf der Fahrbahn), deshalb mein ursprüngliches Tagging als pedestrian…
luschi (2015-03-22 21:56:26+00:00): Rückgängig gemacht...pedestrian ist in meinen Augen falsch...ich lass das jetzt so
tyr_asd (2015-03-22 21:58:58+00:00): Was würdest du denn vorschlagen? Würde highway=service besser passen?
luschi (2015-03-23 17:13:22+00:00): ich würde die Straße als "cycleway" mappen("track" wie in diesem Änderungssatz würde ich nicht mehr machen). Auch wenn die Straße kein Radweg ist. Zu Überlegen wäre dann noch ob man parallel ein "footway" mappt, da die Straße/Fußweg durch Bäumchen voneinander getrennt ist. "service" aus dem Grund nicht, da mir der "track" in der Mitte nicht als in Verwendung erscheint(ebenso ist die Verbindung Richtung Westen fraglich). Der "track" für die Fläche von Reben kommt genau wie diese Straße von der Kreuzung "Sillnegg-Kalterer Straße". "cycleway" hat des öfteren eine "agricultural" Freigabe und kan gegebenen Falls auch bis zur "track" gemappt wrrden. Hoffe ich hab mich nicht zu kompliziert ausgedrückt... lg
tyr_asd (2015-03-23 20:23:35+00:00): OK, klingt nach einer sinnvollen Lösung. (siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29687538). Habe auch den track hin zum Weingüterweg korrigiert, der tatsächlich keine Verbindung zu machen scheint (siehe Geoportal der Gemeinde Eppan: https://gis-eppan.gvcc.net/mapaccel/?project=geoportal&view=Global&locale=de).
mweper (2015-03-22 12:13:41+00:00): Aqui está algo mejor, pero tiene errores.
Las interpolaciones no se agregan en la relación, solo los nodos y la calle.
Los nodos no llevan "name" sino "addr:street"
woodpeck (2015-03-22 20:52:30+00:00): This is a rather large changeset to be submitted without any comment at all. Care to explain what the changes were you committed here? I saw that you modified some TIGER roads but didn't delete the "tiger:revieved=no" tag. Why?
robinhood2018 (2015-03-22 22:03:56+00:00): Oh, I didn't know about that tag, my bad. I just usually "save" my changes occasionally, I guess I shouldn't let my changesets get this large, much less spanning multiple continents. I from now on will try to change that tag when I fix the alignment issues.
mweper (2015-03-22 12:15:22+00:00): Aqui se pueden fusionar las 2 relaciones del bv en 1 sola. Se trata de agregar una sola relacion asociatedStreet por calle.
vsandre (2015-03-23 08:56:22+00:00): Die Häuser Dr.-Th-Neubauer-Straße wurden noch nicht wieder aufgebaut.
kreuzschnabel (2020-04-01 07:11:13+00:00): Moin, ja, ist schon eine Ewigkeit her, aber soweit ich sehe, hast du hier eine Menge Flächen erfasst. Prinzipiell danke dafür, aber ich habe gestern hier die Wege überarbeitet und war die Hälfte der Zeit damit beschäftigt, vorhandene Verklebungen von Flächengrenzen mit Wegen oder überlappende Flächen aufzuräumen :) aber wahrscheinlich arbeitest du heute auch sorgfältiger als vor fünf Jahren, daher versteh das nur als kleine Bestätigung darin :D
romanshuvalov (2015-03-22 12:53:00+00:00): Ошибка, надо сделать откат!
romanshuvalov (2015-03-22 12:52:43+00:00): Ошибка, надо сделать откат!
GerdP (2015-10-07 03:46:25+00:00): Please review:
This change created an invalid tag 
highway=residential;living_street
for way 227664825
Seandebasti (2015-10-31 11:26:32+00:00): thx for commiting, sry
GerdP (2015-10-31 11:30:59+00:00): it is likely to happen with iD, so take care ;-)
trigpoint (2015-03-22 15:56:48+00:00): Hi
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/534348929 is tagged as a pub, however it has been placed in the centreline of Green End.
It should not be connected to a road in this way as it can.
trigpoint (2015-03-22 15:58:48+00:00): The way to tag a closed pub, assuming it still looks like a pub is to change the tag to disused:amenity=pub. There is no need to move it.
hbrox (2015-03-23 09:44:51+00:00): Think it's the Fox and Goose that I have inadvertantly put in the middle of Green End (didn't realise I had moved it!). Will try to fix, but baffled as to why I can see the node (and the White Bear) in different places on different views.
hbrox (2015-03-23 19:57:54+00:00): Went to look at the Fox and Goose today, and saw that there is no sign saying "Fox and Goose" anymore, so no longer any use as any kind of landmark. The builders were in and told me it is going to be converted to be 2 houses and a couple of shops, so in view of that, I intend to delete it
trigpoint (2015-03-22 15:49:57+00:00): Looking at bing imagery, this footpath looks as through it connects with The Firs.
It looks as though it is not as straight as drawn.
Is it possible to add some gps traces?
hbrox (2015-03-23 09:19:16+00:00): I will try to get a GPS trace of it. I'm baffled, though about why my (possiby inept) change appears in the MapQuest Open view but not the Standard view. Will try to work that out.
tvitali (2015-03-22 11:41:55+00:00): Приветсвую!
вопрос такой - а что ты сультиполигоны не используешь - в этой правке можно было нарисовать все гораздо проще если их использовать. Например тут посмотри - очень показательно https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/52.6835/43.8394
Nakaner (2015-03-22 09:50:33+00:00): siehe auch meinen Kommentar zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28065259
user_599436 (2015-03-22 12:39:42+00:00): Would you please add comments to your changesets? They're a great way of helping other mappers understand what you changed as well yourself if you ever check it in the future. It needn't be lengthy, just a short description. Thanks! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse (2015-03-23 15:51:59+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154685330 really called "A6003/A6014 Roundabout" now?  It's a while since I've driven across it but I don't remember it having a name at all.

Obviously it's at the junction of those roads, but that doesn't mean that it has a name consisting of the reference numbers of those roads and the word "roundabout".
StephaneP (2015-03-31 08:35:28+00:00): Salut !

Place=continent pour la rue de la Tannerie ! Wow ! :-)
J'ai corrigé :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29870465
Swen Wacker (2015-03-22 20:46:09+00:00): Hallo,

hält die Museumsbahn nicht mehr in Scharnebeck? (http://www.heide-express.de/index.php/fahrplan.html?file=tl_files/heide-express_de/Fahrplaene/Haltestellenaushang%202015.pdf)
jendrusk (2015-03-26 08:24:50+00:00): Cześć

Grześ zrewertowałem usunięty pikietaż bo changeset nie miał opisu i nie jestem pewny czy chciałeś go usunąć czy to pomyłka. Jeśli jesteś pewien że powinien być usunięty to daj znać. Opisuj proszę changesety - w ten sposób unikniemy w przyszłości niepotrzebnych rewertów :)

Pozdrawiam
Grzegorz_1970 (2015-03-29 13:56:48+00:00): Cześć,
OK, dzięki za pomoc. Stawiam pierwsze kroki z OpenStreetMap, do tej pory korzystałem z niej raczej jako użytkownik. 
Pozdrawiam
jendrusk (2015-03-29 19:20:57+00:00): :)

Jakbyś potrzebował pomocy z czymś to pisz :)

Pozdrawiam
kreuzschnabel (2018-04-09 21:19:54+00:00): Leider hast du deinen Revert der Klassifizierung vor drei Jahren im Kommentar zwar erwähnt, aber nicht begründet, daher weiß ich nicht, was dich dazu bewogen hat. Das Wiki verlangt für einen hw=trunk 1. Kreuzungsfreiheit, 2. Anbaufreiheit und 3. im Regelfall anhaltefreie Fahrt, und alle drei Kriterien sehe ich hier als gegeben. Bauliche Trennung ist für einen trunk nicht erforderlich. Ich habe daher den kreuzungsfreien Teil (bis zur Einmündung der Karlsruher Straße von Graben-Neudorf) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57952313 wieder hochgestuft. Desgleichen die B 35 östlich/nördlich Graben-Neudorf.
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:11:28+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445888463
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 11:59:32+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50250480
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-23 12:22:55+00:00): Where is discussion with Polish community about it?
putzich (2015-03-23 20:17:01+00:00): there ain't no. 
No data gets lost except relations with 0 members. 
And data was added/fixed although.
SomeoneElse (2015-03-23 22:54:42+00:00): At the very least I'd expect some sort of discussion - someone will surely remember how relations such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2542818/history came to be added 2 years ago (with a node in them), then have the node immediately deleted.  Clearly a relation with no members isn't, as it stands, meaningful data - but is the fix to "just delete it" or to re-add the missing node?

Here's an overview of type=person relations, BTW:

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/8mF

- Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of the OSM Data Working Group.
Mauro1985 (2015-03-24 00:57:10+00:00): A relation with zero members is not a spatial data. It should not belong to osm.
kayle (2015-03-23 05:34:30+00:00): Ahoj, Veľká Homôľka je údajne s mäkčeňom. Aspoň tak hovorí záväzné názvoslovie http://www.skgeodesy.sk/sk/ugkk/geodezia-kartografia/standardizacia-geografickeho-nazvoslovia/
anirud (2015-03-23 06:23:15+00:00): Veru je to tak... 
Ja odtiaľ pochádzam, bol som tam aspoň 20x, teda na neďalekej Malej Homôlke, ktorá mimochodom bola uvedená bez mäkčeňa, ale vidno ju iba na freemap.sk, neviem... A takisto Pod Homôlkou neďaleko bolo uvedené bez mäkčeňa. Čo je na turistickej tabuľke, netuším... Čo s tým?