piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
frosm (2018-10-18 22:51:35+00:00): cher RB94
quand va-tu prendre en compte les nombreuses remarques qui -t-on déjà été fait et qui ont déjà conduit à de nombreux blocages de tes différents comptes ?
prendre tu plaisir à passer énormément de temps à faire ce qui serra ensuite purement, simplement annulé parce que les gens en ont assez que tu n'en fasses qu'à ta tête alors que c'est un projet COLLABORATIF et que cela implique donc de suivre certains conventions.
la première, mainte fois demandée est de mettre un descriptif compréhensible de tes modifications.
non "j'ai changé certains choses" n'est PAS un descriptif ! on sait bien qu'une modification consiste à modifier certains choses !
je t'invite à lire https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
DEUX : osm n'est pas une annexe de la ratp. il faut donc cesser de copier-coller le moindre détail et espace de la ratp vers osm.
par exemple : Vanves-Lycée Michelet n'a aucun sens.
Vanves-Lycée n'est pas un mot composé. c'est la ville suivit de "Lycée Michelet" c'est pour cela qu'il y avait un espace entre les 2.

je t'invite à t'abstenir de changer le moindre nom pendant un bon bout de temps, il y a plus qu'assez d'autre remarque à tenir compte et à tenir compte des nombreuses autres remarques déjà émises sur tes autres comptes.

j'attends un message de confirmation de ta part que ce message a été lu, compris, et pris en compte !
viloan (2018-10-17 15:23:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Freso (2018-10-17 15:36:56+00:00): I tried setting the change note to: "Add/edit POIs on Järnvägsgatan, Landskrona. #survey", but I guess OsmAnd decided to not use that…
andrewwiseman (2018-10-17 19:56:04+00:00): Thanks for mapping! When mapping buildings you should only add to the "name" field if you know what the building is called, and there is a proper name -- such as North School or McDonalds. In this case these are just buildings so probably they don't have names. Here is more about the Name tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
El'Victor (2018-10-19 11:35:45+00:00): Thanks @andrewwiseman. Am grateful. I have taken the correction.
andrewwiseman (2018-10-22 22:02:27+00:00): Thanks! it looks like they all still have name=building though, you should take that off
andrewwiseman (2018-10-23 00:21:19+00:00): see these buildings for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63615126#map=19/6.20551/7.07129
El'Victor (2018-10-23 09:10:35+00:00): OK. Thank you. I will do that.
jodd (2020-05-24 17:46:54+00:00): Hallo EvanE,
du hast mit diesem Changeset die Bus-Halteposition https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1458837974 von "Hauptbahnhof" in "Hauptbahnhof Frankfurt" umbenannt. Steht das wirklich so am Haltestellenschild? Alle anderen Halteposition in dem Bereich heißen nämlich nur "Hauptbahnhof".
Viele Grüße, jodd
EvanE (2020-07-17 22:13:55+00:00): Das ist ziemlich sicher eine Haltetelle für Fernbusse. Während im lokalen Kontext Namen wie Hautbahnhof oder ZOB meist ausreichend sind, ist das bei Fernbuslinien ohne Ortsnamen nichtssagend und damit ätzend.

Edbert
mavl (2018-11-23 18:43:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64828864, 64826780 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
carciofo (2019-01-09 16:52:05+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! Regarding the name changes of buildings on the MIA grounds, is the numbering specific to MIA or where is this numbering coming from? There is no source tag on the changesets, so I had to ask. Also, please note that by convention, no abbreviations (e.g. Bldg) are used in OSM for names (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29). Thanks in advance and looking back to your response. Happy mapping
mangokm40 (2019-01-10 12:35:27+00:00): There was a couple of point objects with building #s on the map.  The building #s were incorrect.  Thus, I went about putting all the #s of the large buildings.  I will go through it all again and get rid of the word 'bldg'.  I will include the source that is Miami-Dade Aviation Department.  Besides correcting errors, I thought it might be useful to someone going to one of the many buildings that don't have a street address.
dktue (2018-10-17 16:06:56+00:00): Ích habe lit=unknown entfernt, da dies implizit klar ist wenn das Tag fehlt. Ist es aber mit einem (beliebigen) Wert gesetzt, so werden Auswertungen erschwert, die prüfen, bei welchen Haltestellen noch getaggt werden muss.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/301954042

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63616248
Juan Carlos G F (2018-10-17 21:49:46+00:00): Deja de realizar pintadas y dedícate a otra cosa más que a crearte cuentas nuevas.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-21 13:29:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63727384 where the changeset comment is: Reverting the changes of a sock-puppet account in Spain
Juan Carlos G F (2018-10-17 22:01:47+00:00): No se llama I.E.S  Javier Orbecano.

Ahora se llama I.E.S María Telo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-21 13:29:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63727384 where the changeset comment is: Reverting the changes of a sock-puppet account in Spain
blauer_elefant (2018-10-25 17:01:11+00:00): Hallo,
der Grillplatz ist doch bestimmt keine wildernes_hut gemäß https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dwilderness_hut . Würde evtl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dbbq besser passen, ggf. verbunden mit covered=yes?
Viele Grüße.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-10-21 13:29:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63727384 where the changeset comment is: Reverting the changes of a sock-puppet account in Spain
neuhausr (2018-10-25 15:40:35+00:00): Hi, curious why you changed the elevators to "fitness station"? If you want to indicate the location of stairs, there is a way to do that, but unless they are specifically there for fitness purposes, I don't think they should use the fitness tag. And by removing the elevator tag, you have made the map less informative.
Manfredos (2026-04-15 10:00:47+00:00): Firma ist umgezogen, nicht mehr an diesem Standort ansässig. Eintrag soll gelöscht werden.
Glassman (2018-10-17 18:34:41+00:00): It looks like you change the ' in McDonald's to a " as McDonald"s. Can you correct that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63617711
kapazao (2018-10-17 17:42:50+00:00): Hola, he visto que has eliminado un punto de interés llamado el Peñón del Jorobado y lo has vuelto a crear de nuevo. Por favor no hagas esto, ya que es innecesario y se pierde toda la información histórica sobre este punto.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63617920
itrivi (2018-10-17 18:00:26+00:00): Pido perdón. El punto estaba tan desplazado que no lo había visto, creía que faltaba. Y cuando me di cuenta, en vez de borrar el mío y desplazar el existente, lo hice al revés. :-(
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63617920
itrivi (2018-10-17 18:01:12+00:00): ¿Se puede revertir esto? No soy muy experto en OSM....
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63617920
kapazao (2018-10-17 18:40:34+00:00): No sé si se puede revertir solo el punto o tiene que ser el conjunto entero, la verdad que no lo he hecho aún. Sería lo suyo poder revertir solo el punto.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63617920
SomeoneElse (2019-02-03 20:08:36+00:00): Hello,
You shouldn't have to add bicycle=yes to a trunk road in the UK (though it's not wrong, obviously).  If a router doesn't want to route a bike down a UK trunk road arguably its a bug with that router.
Best Regards,
Andy
Pete Owens (2019-02-04 11:30:26+00:00): But the previous tagging - bicycle=no - was wrong and needed correcting.
SomeoneElse (2019-02-04 13:39:25+00:00): Ah - hadn't spotted that.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151278504/history has been wrong since 2012.  See also https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/FNA .
Nmxosm (2018-10-21 09:36:48+00:00): Auch hier ist die Telefonnummer falsch eingetragen.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2018-10-26 16:48:58+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.
mavl (2018-11-23 18:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64828864, 64826780 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source].
HRamos23 (2018-10-17 17:05:31+00:00): Hopefully complete for buildings; please check
literan (2018-10-18 15:45:14+00:00): Здравствуйте! некорректный формат адреса. Правильно будет addr:housenumber=20 с2. Я исправил. Тут можно почитать: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
alo8 (2018-11-05 18:34:48+00:00): Kleine Verständnisfrage: Der Zuweg Pfälzer Höhenweg zur Ruine Randeck ist nicht mehr ausgeschildert?
trailschneck (2018-11-06 05:12:28+00:00): Also ich hab zumindest keinen mehr gesehen. Das wär mir bestimmt aufgefallen da ich den ganzen Höhenweg abgelaufen bin.
Nmxosm (2018-10-21 09:36:00+00:00): Auch hier ist die Telefonnummer im falschen Format eingetragen worden.

VlG Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2018-10-26 16:48:39+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.
ika-chan! (2019-04-27 21:27:56+00:00): I am not happy with how you assign some of the side roads to a motorway when it is really not, such as the slip roads on the Athinon.
Te-Ika (2019-04-29 13:54:11+00:00): Hi ika-chan,
Could you send me a link to the roads in particular? It has been awhile since I worked here and I would like to just refresh myself on which roads you mean. I am constantly trying to improve and would like to have your feedback.
ika-chan! (2019-04-29 14:11:48+00:00): Hello there,

For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437409814 is not a motorway link because the tertiary side road merges into a motorway slip road in the process of joining a secondary road. It should realistically be secondary.

At https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561182489, the link roads that cross Tatoi should be a secondary link, because they are not part of a motorway. You also must be sure not to merge ways without checking that there is no turn restriction or traffic flow directive, which exist to reinforce the norms of Greek driving law.  

Unfortunately, there is a user who thinks it is okay to map motorway junctions so crudely (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/37.80333/22.73178), despite the fact that the remainder of the slip roads are motorway_link since there is "no escape".

I am very sorry for sounding harsh, this concern could have not come at a worse time when there is a serious community dispute over road names and numbers — it is so tempting to suggest organised editors to sit out while the crisis continues. My position is that "Odos" and "Leoforos" go to "name:prefix"=*, and that National Road (EO) numbers go to ref=* because they are in the law. I think that is a reasonable compromise.
Te-Ika (2019-04-29 14:59:33+00:00): Okay for the 1st example you mentioned I definitely agree with you that it should be a secondary road because you are right that the merging of the tertiary changes the function of the road after it. I will make that change now. For the opposite side of the road would you also carry the primary straight through rather then having it change to a primary link? This is the link in question https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604643265

For your second example I understand what you mean by it being a secondary link. I think I made it a motorway link all the way across because I feel as though that is the same road just entering or exiting a junction. If you feel strongly that it should be a secondary_link I have no problem changing that back. Though I am a tad confused about your mention of being careful to merge due to turn restrictions. Did I miss a turn restriction at this junction? I usually try and watch out for those and make sure to add them whenever I can if I missed it I would like to go back and add that. 

I would also agree with your assessment of the 3rd junction. 

Finally, there are no harsh feeling here. I can relate to your frustration, these types of disagreements can be quite disrupting to a community! I took a look at the forums and I would think that your solution could be a great compromise! I hope that things work out soon. Let me know if there is anything else I can fix or help with!
ika-chan! (2019-04-29 15:16:44+00:00): That and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217799896 should be primary because that is the route for the EO83 traffic to access the roundabout. The opposite side stays as secondary because it has to cross another major junction before the traffic can join the EO83.

As for the second junction, and any grade separated junction, I was thinking more of https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.70614/-0.38238 - I could not classify the crossing roads as motorway_link because it made no sense when it is sandwiched between two unrestricted roads. so there is a case for using secondary_link in this grade separated junction. I am also sure that there was a traffic flow relation at some point: in any case they exist because some routers … some routers sometimes recommend illegal turns without them.
Te-Ika (2019-04-29 15:47:53+00:00): Okay I made the changes for the first part.

For the second one I would suppose my only input would be that when you turn you would 'enter' that road that is going to bring you to the motorway and that until you make that final turn onto the secondary you are still on that road that brought you from the motorway and because we would classify the one part to be a motorway_link that would carry through until its termination/generation. 

Though I can understand your argument for it being secondary because it no longer has those restrictions that apply to motorway_links. Would you like me to make them Secondary links?
ika-chan! (2019-04-29 16:13:30+00:00): Yes, the links on the middle of a lower-class road, on the grade-separated interchange, do not have motorway restrictions.
Te-Ika (2019-04-29 16:17:15+00:00): Sounds good! I have made the changes. Let me know if there is anything else I can help you with!
Nmxosm (2018-10-18 06:22:33+00:00): Hallo Riccarcharias,

in deinem Änderungssatz fügst du eine Telefonnummer hinzu. Bitte beachte, dass laut Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone) Telefonnummern in dem dort genannten Format angegeben werden sollten. Bitte korrigiere dies.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2018-10-21 09:34:37+00:00): Danke, dass du das korrigiert hast.
geoaria (2018-10-28 15:35:09+00:00): سلام 
لطفا در ادیت های خود دقت بیشتری مبذول کنید
خطای شما توسط osmi/ ردیابی و اصلاح گردید
Nmxosm (2018-10-21 09:40:35+00:00): Bitte formatiere Telefonnummern entsprechend dem Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone)

VlG Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2018-10-26 16:50:42+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.
AngocA (2021-09-15 02:45:01+00:00): Estos edificios nunca existieron. Se borran porque son inválidos.
rainerU (2018-10-17 17:59:44+00:00): Bonjour schiffsratte,

Bienvenu dans la communauté OpenStreetMap et merci pour tes premières contributions. Je me permets quelques remarques. Tu as ajouté motor_vehicle=designated à la rue S.Bonay. "designated" indique qu'une voie est obligatoire pour un type de vehicule. Je suppose que l'acces à cette voie est réservé aux riverains, dans quel cas motor_vehicle=destination serait correct. 

Les images satellite laissent croire que cette voie est en sens unique. Si c'est le cas, peux tu renverser le sens de la voie et ajouter oneway=yes.

Bonne continuation
rainerU
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63619212
schiffsratte (2018-10-17 18:18:22+00:00): Bonjour, 
en effet c'est réservé aux riverains. je viens de le corriger. Par contre pour l'instant elle est bien ouvert le deux sens 
Bonne soirée
Jens
mavl (2018-11-10 11:56:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64347706, 64349160 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
johnny_1982 (2019-01-09 22:18:56+00:00): Esta carretera (y más al norte y al sur) es ahora un largo puente. ¿Por qué? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/466970687
literan (2018-10-18 15:39:26+00:00): добрый день. Не надо везде писать "Детская площадка", поле name - только для имен собственных. Вычистил все.
silversurfer83 (2022-01-06 21:16:43+00:00): Hi. Ich sehe, dass die Änderung schon 3 Jahre alt ist, aber mich wundert, dass der Grenzverlauf quer durch den Sportplatz Immighausen geht. Wie sicher bist du dir mit dem Verlauf?
Grüße :)
TourenbikerFKB (2022-01-06 22:33:05+00:00): Ich bin zufällig auf den Kommentar gestoßen. Der Sportplatz ist laut Geodaten Hessen ein einheitliches Grundstück. Deshalb kann eine Flurgrenze eigentlich nicht den Platz durchqueren. Was auch immer "PD-Karten von BYU" bedeutet - die aktuellen Geodaten von Hessen dürften korrekt sein. Die dürfen wir übrigens demnächst ganz legal nutzen. Gruß Rainer (aus Frankenberg)
TourenbikerFKB (2022-01-06 23:01:10+00:00): Inzwischen weiß ich, was PD BYU ist :-)

@cgu66: kannst du mal die Karte verlinken? Auf dieser hier

https://www.landkartenarchiv.de/messtischblatt.php?q=4719_Korbach_ca_1950_McM89444

verläuft jedenfalls die Grenze am südl. Rand des Grundstückes, das heute der Sportplatz ist

http://susudata.de/messtisch/openstreetmap.html

wird die Fläche, die heute der Sportplatz ist, nicht von der Grenze durchschnitten.
Szymson (2018-10-17 19:04:41+00:00): Ma to jak najbardziej sens, zwłaszcza że na wiadukcie na ul. Chopina i na ul. Kopernika jest ograniczenie tonażu do 20 t oraz zakaz wjazdu z towarami niebezpiecznymi, a na obwodnicy Pruszcza nie ma żadnych ograniczeń z tego co zauważyłem podczas wizyt w terenie.
mavl (2018-11-23 18:43:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64828864, 64826780 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source].
flohoff (2018-10-18 16:33:14+00:00): Moin Holger,
hier auf dem Varusweg ist wieder die living_street + maxspeed überwachung angesprungen ;)

Was isn das nu?

Flo
HolgerJeromin (2018-10-19 05:39:56+00:00): Wie auf mapillary klar erkennbar: living_street
Danke trotzdem für die Info, behoben in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63667453
mavl (2018-11-23 18:43:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64828864, 64826780 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible source].
Glassman (2018-10-17 23:26:03+00:00): It looks like you added a building within a building. The better way would be to just add a point (node) at the entrance of the business. Can you fix it?
Cory Kill (2018-10-17 18:37:27+00:00): Opps, first change I made!  This was the city boundary and not a road so it should not have been changed.
czubi (2018-10-18 15:18:02+00:00): Jetzt gibts die Fleischerei doppelt :(
JulesGabrielVerne (2018-10-18 10:55:54+00:00): szybki jesteś :)
Nmxosm (2018-10-21 09:40:20+00:00): Bitte formatiere Telefonnummern entsprechend dem Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone)

VlG Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2018-10-26 16:51:36+00:00): Wurde dieser Änderungssatz bei der Korrektur absichtlich vergessen?
Nmxosm (2018-10-28 09:04:24+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.
GerdP (2018-10-18 07:51:47+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=crossing. Was this tag suggested by Go Map ?
If I got that right the sat images show a bridge and steps or ramps connecting this bridge with the primary roads. The bridge itself is not connected to the sidewalks next to primary roads, so it should be tagged 
highway=footway + bridge=yes + layer=1
Next, draw the to ways which connect it to the road network.
Maybe add sidewalk=left or sidewalk=right to the primary roads where this is feasable.
Ashiqur Choudhury (2018-10-19 06:32:52+00:00): Thank you for your comment. Yes there is indeed an overbridge there, with steps connecting the bridge to the sidewalks of the primary road. 

I would like to add 'sidewalk' to these primary roads, and then connect the bridge with the road, so that it is properly represented. Could you please help me with 'adding a sidewalk to a primary road'?
GerdP (2018-10-19 06:43:46+00:00): First see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
There are two ways to map a sidewalk:
1) add the tag sidewalk to the existing road. Maybe split the road if only a part of it has a sidewalk. 
2) add a new way with highway=footway, footway=sidewalk and make sure that it is connected to the road network. 
Option 2) is typically more complex and often leads to routing errors for pedestrians.
I have no idea how to do that with Go Map! or iD. Do you know the editor JOSM?
Ashiqur Choudhury (2018-10-19 06:45:37+00:00): Haven't used JOSM, but I've added the sidewalk tag on the road using iD editor. If u have time in hand, could you please see my edit one more time? That would be really helpful.
GerdP (2018-10-19 06:50:27+00:00): I don't see a change. Did you save already?
Ashiqur Choudhury (2018-10-19 07:02:40+00:00): I did, in fact. I believe it might take a few minutes to go live.
Ashiqur Choudhury (2018-10-19 07:03:13+00:00): Changeset #63668716
GerdP (2018-10-19 07:11:29+00:00): The sidewalk tags look OK, but I can't say if the whole stretch of the road has a sidewalk.
The bridge still was not OK. Please check my changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63668975
Ashiqur Choudhury (2018-10-19 09:08:55+00:00): Understood. will be aware of it in future. Thanks a lot. I shall change the other overbridges accordingly.
eggie (2018-10-17 21:36:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-10-17 21:49:13+00:00): Dag Raymond..
Lees svp even de eerste zin over de definitie van een dierentuin. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dzoo
Of is dit met avifauna te vergelijken? 
Wellicht wel gewoon building=aviary
Pas je het zelf aan en haal je de dierentuinverwijzing weg, want die hoort bij tourism=zoo?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-18 07:16:18+00:00): aangepast.. dierentuintag verwijderd
mavl (2018-12-24 23:31:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].