piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck (2025-08-04 12:30:08+00:00): Ok, ich habe den Namen jetzt mal entfernt siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169952926 - Telefonbuch und Creditreform sind für uns keine gültigen Quellen, aber wenn er vor Ort ein Schild stehen haben sollte, dürften wir das natürlich eintragen...
user_5359 (2018-02-24 05:08:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert our change set because the information, that alle buildings inside this property have the same address isn't correct. I see on the map, that four different street names exists.
maraf24 (2018-02-25 13:13:36+00:00): Sarnowicze Wielkie to nazwa oboczna i powinna zostać w danych jeziora.
maraf24 (2018-02-26 21:33:23+00:00): Nie wiem gdzie miała być odpowiedź na temat tego jeziora, ale jej nie dostałem. Najlepiej pisać tu - pod zestawem zmian.
Krzywoj67 (2018-02-28 16:17:10+00:00): Jesteś pewny? Nazwa Sarnowiec Wielki oraz dla sąsiedniego jeziora Sarnowiec Mały są w PRNG prezentowanym na Geoportalu. Tak samo jest w publikowanych przez Komisję Standaryzacji Nazw Geograficznych hydronimach.
A Wielkie Sarnowicze, podobnie jak w przypadku tego sąsiedniego jeziora Małe Sarnowicze, występują tylko na dawnych mapach rastrowych. Jest to więc moim zdaniem nie nazwa oboczna, a dawna i już nie aktualna.
maraf24 (2018-02-28 18:29:10+00:00): Wiele nazw w PRNG jest dawnych i nieaktualnych:) Szczególnie jeśli mają status nazwy niezestandaryzowanej.
Jednakże nie szkodzi umieścić nazwy obocznej w alt_name, skoro jest w PRNG.
Zauważ też, że tę nazwę ktoś tu jednak umieścił. Nie jest więc aż taka stara. 
Ja zawsze radzę, by nazwy zastane w OSM, jeśli się nie ma 100% pewności że są błędne, należy zachować w którymś z tagów. Sam umieszczam je w loc_name.
maraf24 (2018-02-28 18:33:58+00:00): Mała uwaga jeszcze:)
W PRNG nazwa jeziora to "Sarnowiec Wielki", bez "jeziora" w nazwie. 
Nie wiem od czego to zależy, bo są też takie z "jezioro" w nazwie. Może jest jakiś powód.
Krzywoj67 (2018-03-03 08:16:27+00:00): Poprawione
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-11-04 15:09:42+00:00): Czy trasa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104730477/history jest nadal aktualna? Jeśli tak - gdzie można znaleźć dokumenty potwierdzające to?
RubikCubical (2018-02-24 02:54:56+00:00): Sorry, I tagged it as water because I couldn't find the fountain feature on the tags. Feel free to revert anything that isn't right. I don't like the personal attack here though, I'm not even from this area and you're making people hate me.
user_5359 (2018-02-24 05:14:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area.
nevw (2018-02-24 09:06:11+00:00): You appear to duplicated the southern part of Blencowes Firetrail. Instead of using a gps trace to aid adding a way manually to the map you seem to have turned the gps trace into a way directly and added too many unnecessary points. It is better (imho) to use gps traces with realigned satellite imagery as an aid and to add the roads and tracks, etc manually so you can see what is already mapped. Doing it this way allows you to add short sections of the tracks (from satellite imagery) that intersect the one you have mapped helping navigation more.
Also, in the north, Wild Cattle Creek Road does not join Thunderbolts Way with a common node. 
Hope this helps, keep on mapping.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:18:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
mweper (2018-02-24 11:57:20+00:00): Hello, berms. I've been looking at your alignment editions for the Great Rosario and it looks like you're using DG Premium, Bing and Strava traces to align. Since DG premium images are very blurry and along with Bing's images are also old in this area, I recommend using DG Standard (these are more up-to-date and better aligned) or Esri Imagery, along with GPX traces of OSM (that I uploaded myself) and photos of Mapillary.

Whatever questions you have, you can ask me. Greetings.-@mweper
berms (2018-02-27 18:44:30+00:00): Hi mweper. Thank you for the helpful feedback! The reason I was using DG Premium is because the DG Premium Vintage grid data is actually showing as more recent imagery. I would agree with you that Bing imagery is too outdated in this area to use. Going forward, I’ll consider both DG imagery tile sets. Also, thank you for also suggesting the GPS traces that you provided! I’ll take a look.

Regards,
berms
GOwin (2018-02-24 04:23:42+00:00): Hi @Skyboi. Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please don't add the branch information in the name field. For example, name=Jollibee is enough, and not name=Jollibee North Triangle.

If you want to record that information use the branch tag: branch=North Triangle

When you have a few minutes to spare, try the browser-based editor called iD, to edit the map of your community. You may find it quicker and easier if you need to update a lot of information on the map.

There's this concise tips page for Philippine contributors: https://telegra.ph/Awesome-OSM-Tips--Tricks-01-28

Also, find out the latest happenings, or interact with local contributors through these community channels: https://telegra.ph/OpenStreetMap-LoCo-channels-in-the-Philippines-02-15

Welcome and best regards, in behalf of the OSM contributors' community
GOwin
maraf24 (2018-02-26 17:03:44+00:00): Zmiany w całości wycofane z powodu tworzenia fikcji na potrzeby gry.
SuppaGoddo (2018-02-27 00:14:44+00:00): Czyli w centrum miasta jest las, a nie park? Plac musztry nie jest starym placem musztry od byłej jednostki wojskowej, która istnieje od okresu Caratu (nie wiem czy nie jeszcze wcześniej)? Przy Dominikańskiej nie ma parku? Jeżeli kolega sugeruje się google street view, to ma bardzo nieaktualne zdjęcia. Proszę wybrać się w podróż w dane miejsce lub podać e-maila to wyśle zdjęcia jak to wygląda (np. te budki i stacja benzynowa widoczne w googlach są rozwalone na rzecz parku). Zdjęcia będę mógł wysłać jak wyzdrowieje.
Nie wiem czy mogę dokonać dalszych modyfikacji, bo ktoś z Wrocławia zna lepiej moje miasto. Np. budynek Ochotniczej Straży Pożarnej też jest zabytkowy, tak samo jak kino w nim się znajdujące. Jest wiele innych rzeczy... np. brak ruin koszar wojskowych (dopiero teraz po wielu latach zostały wyremontować i wydzierżawione).
maraf24 (2018-02-27 08:24:09+00:00): Następny razem proszę napisać odpowiedź w sposób merytoryczny.
Dla jasności: nigdzie nie napisałem, że wszystkie zmiany były błędne. Wycofałem całość, bo z pewnością część była fałszywa, a ja nie zamierzam tracić czasu na oddzielania dobrych zmian od złych.
SuppaGoddo (2018-02-27 08:59:24+00:00): Może od Pana uzyskam odpowiedź merytoryczną? W odpowiedzi podałem przykłady z życia plus zaoferowałem wysłanie fotek. Nie dostałem ZWROTNEJ MERYTORYCZNEJ odpowiedzi. Jedynie hasło "część była fałszywa, nie zamierzam tracić czasu". Też straciłem czas na oznaczanie tych miejsc. Proszę się wytłumaczyć z tych wycofanych zmian. Jeżeli Panu się nie chce, to nie będę walczył z wiatrakiem, który wie lepiej co jest w moim mieście za pomocą google map... Przyznaje się, że dwa miejsca były fikcyjne czyli ok 10%.

Tak samo pytanie, czemu parki w mieście nie mogą być parkami? Park przy osiedlu który, jest parkiem, jest nim na mapie OpenStreetMap, a inne tego typu Parki, są zagospodarowanym teren miejskim? 

Proszę jeszcze raz o e-maila, bo serio chce wysłać zdjęcia gdy wyzdrowieje - twardy merytoryczny argument, a nie internetowe przepychanki słowne, zwłaszcza że korzysta Pan z google map street view który ma zdjęcia sprzed 5 lat.
itineris (2018-02-24 18:56:01+00:00): Jól szórakozol?
dcapillae_old (2018-02-24 01:01:50+00:00): Hola, Largeroliker.

Para mapear una guardería, usa mejor «amenity=kindergarten». Consulta el wiki para conocer más detalles: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten

En OSM no ponemos nombre a cosas que no lo tienen o de las que desconocemos el nombre. No debemos nombrarlas como «name=Guardería / Escuela infantil», por ejemplo. Consulta esta página de buenas prácticas si quieres conocer más detalles: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a/Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas#Etiqueta_name

Si necesitas ayuda para mapear características, consulta el wiki. También existe una guía para principiantes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_del_principiante

Gracias de nuevo y feliz mapeo.

Daniel
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:24:53+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:16:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631435 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletion from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:25:05+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:14:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631412 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletion and offensive racist insults from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:25:14+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:13:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631395 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, offensive racist insults from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
freebeer (2018-03-01 16:33:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56794177 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletion
freebeer (2018-03-01 16:32:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56794152 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions + insults, revert will be unsuccessful
freebeer (2018-03-01 16:31:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56794093 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions + insults
freebeer (2018-03-01 16:30:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56794052 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions + insults
freebeer (2018-03-01 16:28:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56794007 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions + insults
freebeer (2018-03-01 16:27:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56793970 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions + insults
freebeer (2018-03-01 16:25:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56793939 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions
freebeer (2018-03-01 16:24:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56793894 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions + insults
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:25:52+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:09:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631283 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, changeset nothing but extensive deletions from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
freebeer (2018-03-01 16:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56793855 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:25:38+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:13:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631333 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, changeset extensive deletions and renaming to offensive racist insults from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
woodpeck (2018-03-01 09:10:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56782000 where the changeset comment is: remove vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 10:01:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56632206 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions and random scribbling from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:57:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56632115 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, racist vandalism from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:18:34+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:41:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631843 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions and random scribbling from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:52:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56632063 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, racist vandalism from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:22:01+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:37:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631821 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, changeset nothing but extensive deletions from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:22:15+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631790 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions and random scribbling from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:22:27+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:33:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631773 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, changeset nothing but extensive deletions from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:22:35+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:32:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631762 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, racist vandalism from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:22:44+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:31:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631744 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, racist vandalism from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:23:42+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:30:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631730 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, racist vandalism from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:23:53+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:29:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631712 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, racist vandalism from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:24:00+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 10:11:11+00:00): This will need manual attention, if the DWG is not already on the case.  There is a swastika (incomplete) left, but the user made several changes to the building, and my Potlatch 1 cannot seem to find the latest v29.
The other changesets I started on disappeared (hate it when 'fox doesn't click the way I want), but I trust all the unreverted changesets are in good hands now, so I can Get A Life now that winter has arrived and I'm freezing.
Thanks, as always, for the heads-up.
freebeer (2018-03-01 21:20:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56801276 where the changeset comment is: revert remaining vandalism if possible, revert is incomplete but should fix something I overlooked
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:24:08+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:20:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631520 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, random scribbling from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-24 08:24:23+00:00): Can someone please revert this? Thanks.

#vandalism
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:18:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56631488 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, crude buddhist Hakenkreuz from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:48:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56632006 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, deletions and random scribbling from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
freebeer (2018-02-24 09:50:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56632036 where the changeset comment is: revert Vanderlismus, racist vandalism from troll/Holocaust-denialist user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/JIDF
nevw (2018-02-24 09:19:40+00:00): Using Id you double click on the node to join it to both ways.
user_5359 (2018-02-24 05:02:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I didn't just revert your changeset because of technical errors. A route is not drawn as a new element, but is a collection of existing path (segments) and points in an OSM object of type relation. An example is a busline as a relation. But for a one-time event, we do not accept this information. However, this information can still be displayed on an OSM map, in which this track is shown as additional information on the map.
user_5359 (2018-02-24 04:48:50+00:00): Hello (again)! After the aerial photograph, the two buildings touch each other. A multipolygon relation with inner and outer may be the better solution. 
In addition, the larger building has several addresses, so the address at the relation is not correct.
AngocA (2026-03-11 17:27:08+00:00): Hola mapero.

Veo que los cuerpos de agua de este Changeset tenían la etiqueta Colour, por qué?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563745224/history
Voy a quitar esa etiqueta.

Andres G.
highflyer74 (2018-02-24 07:40:54+00:00): Moin!

Ich glaube, wir hatten schon mal drüber gesprochen... Bitte lasse in Bremen die Adressen am Gebäude. Darüber herrscht hier Konsens, denn das Gebäude hat die Adresse inne. Wenn Du den POIs auch eine Adresse verpassen möchtest, kannst Du das gern machen, aber lasse die Gebäude, wie sie sind. Es wäre nett, wenn Du in diesem Gebiet Deine diesbezüglichen Änderungen rückgängig machen könntest. Danke!
smarties (2018-02-24 15:25:03+00:00): Hi,
wie gut das es dich gibt. Da brauch ich mir keine Sorgen zu machen das ich mal was falsch mache, denn Deiner Aufmerksamkeit entgeht nichts. Ich habe auf allen building wie Du es wolltest wieder die Adressen ergänzt. Gruß smarties
highflyer74 (2018-02-26 08:13:06+00:00): Gracias! :-)
GOwin (2018-02-24 04:19:29+00:00): Hi there. I'd like to inquire about these book shops you've been adding, because they appear to be convenience stores?

Also, please don't use the name field other than for recording the name of the object. The housenumber, and street name values should go to their appropriate field.
btwhite92 (2018-03-06 16:10:56+00:00): Hi NorCalRoads, 
I noticed that you have bumped up many small population centers in the northern Sierras up to 'place=town' rather than 'place=hamlet', etc. Please note that the values for the 'place' tag do not necessarily correspond with what you or I would call a "town". 

Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place, 'place=town' is for "An important urban centre, between a village and a city in size". This tag is more applicable for somewhere like Grass Valley, which has a decent population and a full set of public services but isn't quite a 'city' with a dense urban core. It is not applicable for something like Sweetland, which is no more than a couple houses and a small market.
NorCalRoads (2018-03-06 17:30:03+00:00): Dear theangrytomato,
I live in Alleghany, near Grass Valley, and I can tell you that here, Grass Valley is referred to as a city, and places like Alleghany are referred to as towns comparatively. Also Sweetland may look like just a couple houses, but there are a bunch of nearby neighborhoods that identify as being in Sweetland, giving it an actual population of ~500. In rural areas, those are what we call towns.
btwhite92 (2018-03-06 20:55:21+00:00): Likewise, I personally would refer to Grass Valley as a city and Sweetland as a town as well if I were discussing them with others. However, the title you and I (and others, and even the governments themselves) would give to these places does not necessarily correspond to the correct 'place=' tag, since the names of the values for the 'place=' are mostly arbitrary. These values could just as well have been 'place=2a' (etc), but 'place=village' is a bit easier to remember. We don't really use the word "village" or especially "hamlet" to describe places in the U.S., but that is beside the point because the names of the tags are arbitrary. 

The tags used for 'place=' have long standing consensus and clear enough definitions to determine that a place like Forest cannot possibly be tagged as 'place=town', since this tag has emerged by being defined as "an important urban centre that is larger than a place=village, smaller than a place=city, and not a place=suburb". Forest, as well as many of the other places that we might describe as "towns", do not have a "good range of shops and facilities which are used by people from nearby villages" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dtown).

I would agree that the blanket tagging of any smaller community in the U.S. as 'place=hamlet' is incorrect, but this is mostly an artifact of these markers being from a GNIS import that doesn't use a tagging scheme with one-to-one conversion with OSM. These smaller communities absolutely need reviewing, and I am very happy to see this happening, but I would encourage you to tag these places by finding the most nearly correct description in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place, then tag with the corresponding value - not just for the 'place=' tag, but for all tags. 

If we don't keep tag usage relatively uniform, despite personal opinions, then they become meaningless to the database. I don't personally care much for the 'highway=trunk' == "expressway" definition. But, since this is more or less convention for the tag across most of the country and the world, it is the way I try to use the tag as well.
NorCalRoads (2018-03-06 21:44:39+00:00): Very well, I'll change them back to denominations below towns (although places like Alleghany I will keep as towns) but places like Forest and Sweetland can be referred to as villages or hamlets.