piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Robert46798 (2018-10-29 12:18:02+00:00): Hallo Onken,

herzlich wilkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Danke für deine Aktualisierungen.

Ich muss sagen, ich bin etwas irritiert. Kann es sein, dass du vergessen hast den Änderungssatzkommentar zu ändern? Denn mit Kameras kann ich hier nichts finden. Nur ein paar leicht verschobene Punkte, zu denen man nicht viel sagen kann.

Ansonsten noch ein grundsätzlicher Hinweis: Dort wo du den Änderungssatzkommentar eingetragen hast gibt es die Option auf weitere Felder. Es ist immer gern gesehen dort eine Quelle einzutragen. Wenn du die Informationen selbst vor Ort aufgenommen hast ist hier "survey" ein Standardwert. Es ist für andere Mapper durchaus interessant zu wissen, ob die Daten beispielsweise vor Ort erhoben wurden oder vielleicht nur aus dem Internet stammen. Insbesondere bei späteren Bearbeitungen.

In diesem Fall wäre eine Quelle durchaus auch interessant. Wenn ein neuer Mapper in kurzer Zeit 50 Überwachungskameras einträgt ist das auffällig. Das Problem könnte in so einem Fall sein, dass urherberrechtlich geschütztes Material verwendet wurde, das für OSM nicht verwendet werden darf. Das sieht mir in diesem Fall nicht so aus. Trotzdem würde ich mich um eine Rückmeldung diesbezzüglich freuen.

Viel spaß beim Weitermappen!

Grüße,
Robert
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-28 23:50:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63962252 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam.
gabro00 (2018-10-26 11:17:19+00:00): Az Ág utca egyik pontját elhúztad véletlen, javítottam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63896742
siparon (2018-10-26 15:29:22+00:00): Köszi javítást, egy blokkolóelemet kerestem a környéken.
arvdk (2018-10-26 11:02:17+00:00): Is dat het enige wat je hebt gedaan? http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63896159 
Volgens die link heb je ook de Dolomietstraat over een stuk stoep laten lopen..
Ik was toevallig ook daar aan het werk dus ik heb de Dolomietstraat terug gezet.
Tomas Straupis (2018-10-26 11:22:05+00:00): Metras vienuo nuo kito esančius smulkius kelius (šaligatvius, dviračių kelius) nevedame kaip atskirus vektorius. Jie neduoda reikiamos informacijos, tik bereikalingai apkrauna žemėlapį, gaunasi makalynė, kurioje neina atskirti, kas ten per keliai yra.
Taigi atskirais vektoriais vedame tik tuos kelius, kurie yra FIZIŠKAI atskirti vienas nuo kito: gal barjeru, gal bent metro pločio žolės juosta ar pan.
Tomas Straupis (2018-10-26 11:23:41+00:00): Dviračių ir pėsčiųjų (bendras) takas yra žymimas highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated. Atstačiau neteisingus pakeitimus.
Truchin (2018-10-26 12:30:59+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est quoi cette cabane d'observation des oiseaux sur le bord du canal ?
Pour les installations temporaires, il faut plutôt utiliser umap https://umap.openstreetmap.fr
Truchin (2018-10-26 12:31:51+00:00): Sauf avis contraire de ta part, je vais supprimer ta première modification car il me semble que tu t'es trompée d'outil.
GerdP (2018-10-27 06:43:05+00:00): Hi! Please don't invent new _link types for highways like residential_link on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638203913
and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638203917
You added only one turn restriction. Maybe one is missing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10581158?
Pikse (2018-10-27 07:19:31+00:00): Indeed, only tertiary class and higher has _link equivalent. I didn't remember this correctly. I did cut these segements off respectively from ways 55531234 and 8050643 so that they wouldn't have the same name. I don't know if there should be a turn restriction.

Maybe secondary_link would do between ways of "secondary" type. At the momemnt, to be sure I'll change them back to "residential" after ways that I cut these segments off from.
GerdP (2018-10-27 07:23:50+00:00): Yes, these roads are residential.
norcross (2018-11-11 17:38:30+00:00): 今日は,

why have you removed the man_made=works from these plants?
kartler175 (2018-11-05 13:48:22+00:00): Please do not duplicate objects, use existing ones for turn restrictions. Use JOSM valdator as useful tool.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-122.74889&lat=49.14475&zoom=17&opacity=1.00&overlays=duplicate_ways
inah_telenav (2018-11-05 14:18:05+00:00): Sorry, didn't see that mistake.
eggie (2018-10-26 13:13:49+00:00): name= is de officiele naam en zal renderen. name:nl gebruiken we niet in Nederland.. behalve in de provincie Friesland. 
Zit hier nu een belwinkel of een hakkenbar? 


MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

MVG,
Eggie
Mike Baggaley (2018-11-01 13:57:25+00:00): Hi, this seems to be more like a description rather than a name. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
Justin Jolly Samuel (2018-11-05 10:04:25+00:00): Thanks. i will change it to just "Westmoreland Court Road"
Mike Baggaley (2018-11-05 16:04:24+00:00): Please also review the access conditions, as the combination doesn't make sense. Cheers,
Mike
FreedSky (2018-12-07 06:19:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5714951/history 干嘛删了
eggie (2018-10-26 13:09:40+00:00): Please don't change the addressnumbers. It's imported from the Dutch Kadaster.
The number is 11B.
mavl (2018-11-16 12:26:51+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника вы добавляете адреса.
maraf24 (2018-11-04 11:37:56+00:00): Wandlizm, wciaż widać dziurę na mapie.
maraf24 (2018-11-04 11:36:19+00:00): Wandalizm-skasowanie lasu.
Florimondable (2018-11-13 21:53:30+00:00): Bonjour,
Je pense que c'est une erreur de retirer «cycleway:right=share_busway» étant donnée que l'infra structure (une voie bus avec marquage sol vélo) existe toujours.
Pour ce qui est de l'accès c'est une autre histoire.
_Mathieu_ (2018-11-14 07:15:33+00:00): Bonjour,
Le marquage au sol existe, mais les 3 panneaux "sens interdit" côté Ledru-Rollin n'indiquent que "sauf bus" et pas "sauf vélo", donc pour moi cette signalisation l'emporte sur ce qui reste au sol.
Florimondable (2018-11-15 19:37:19+00:00): Il y a bien un problème, il faudrait pouvoir décrire l'infrastructure et le droit d'accès.
Là c'est mélangé,
SomeoneElse (2018-10-26 23:51:57+00:00): Hello,
What licence was the planet.com imagery used here made available under?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2018-10-26 23:53:22+00:00): 你好，
这里使用的planet.com图像有哪些许可证？
最好的祝福，
安迪
sejohnson (2018-11-09 17:51:41+00:00): You seem to have drawn a box around the general outline of the school. Please trace the outline of the building exterior.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63898136
kartonage (2018-10-26 17:02:16+00:00): Hallo Nelov, danke für die Eintragung.

Die Sprache der Öffnungszeiten ist richtig aber das Format ist etwas anders. Hier wäre passender: "Mo-Tu 09:00-12:00,15:00-18:00; We 09:00-12:00; Th 09:00-12:00,15:00-18:00; Fr 09:00-13:00" 
//
Zwei Buchstaben für den Tag reichen also. Das & wird mit einem einfachen Komma gemacht, Verschiedene Tage trennt man aber am besten mit ; und die Uhrzeiten etwas digitaler. Dann kann das auch jeder gut auswerten. Eine komplette Übersicht gibt es hier (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours) und ein nettes Tool zum Testen hier (http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/).

Bei Fragen gern Fragen. :)
Schöne Grüße
kartonage (2018-10-26 17:04:56+00:00): Sorry, für den zweiten Einschub aber mir fällt gerade auf, dass man es sogar noch kürzen kann: Mo-Tu,Th 09:00-12:00,15:00-18:00; We 09:00-12:00; Fr 09:00-13:00
mueschel (2018-10-27 13:08:37+00:00): Hi,
you added 75 hydrants with spelling mistakes in the keys:

fire_hydrant:parking_lotosition
fire_hydrant:typarking_lote

Could you have a look and fix these?
Thanks, Jan
Supaplex (2020-02-05 09:33:13+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Happy Mapping!
mavl (2019-07-21 11:38:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
narceliodesa (2018-10-26 16:52:06+00:00): Acredito que essas vias que foram mapeadas como highway=pedestrian deveriam ser highway=footway.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63899440
Revolta Gardy (2018-10-26 19:29:20+00:00): Certo. fiz algumas mudanças.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:38:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:38:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2019-07-21 11:38:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:38:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
chnav (2018-10-30 06:31:48+00:00): Дубликат заправки удалён, она уже была нарисована. Учтите что обновление карт MAPS.ME происходит примерно раз в месяц.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:38:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:38:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:38:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2018-10-26 13:15:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:38:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
عبد القادر الجزائري (2018-10-26 13:59:31+00:00): Again you removed the original names used on signs and by the government and replaced by self-invented fantasy names. The name "Tala n Mezyav" you entered gives 0 results in Google.
Tamazight2001 (2018-10-26 19:05:23+00:00): They are not invented names. That´s how the inhabitants call that place. I am from there so I know what I am talking about. Google's results are irrelevant for determining what a place name is called. So is colonialist denomination. The only reliable and correct source is the inhabitants of that place.
woodpeck (2018-11-04 10:48:08+00:00): Tamazight2001, can you supply a photo with a road sign that shows the name you claim to be used locally, or is it just a verbal tradition?
mavl (2018-12-24 23:37:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Marcussacapuces91 (2021-12-26 17:37:58+00:00): Pourquoi répéter housenumber et name. Autant utiliser ref, puisqu'il ne s'agit pas ici d'une adresse postale mais juste du numéro de bungalow
eggie (2018-10-26 13:19:45+00:00): Svp niet zelf de gebouwen intekenen of van vorm veranderen in OSM.. hoe goed bedoeld ook. Alles is ingemeten en geimporteerd vanuit het Kadaster.
Je kunt wel een verzoek doen op het forum van OSM om gebouwen te laten importeren. 
Dat doe je in het draadje "Verzoek BAG import". 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-26 13:26:04+00:00): Wanneer de vorm van een gebouw niet klopt en  het onverhoopt verkeerd ingemeten is kun je dit doorgegeven aan het Kadaster middels hun site. Het heeft geen zin om iets aan te passen. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=rondo%20sliedrecht&resultOffset=0&objectId=0610100000012375&geometry.x=110547.23980359&geometry.y=426965.98018743&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=
eggie (2018-10-26 13:28:19+00:00): De vorm klopte precies.. Ik zal de changeset terugdraaien. Voor de nieuwbouw staat een verzoek op het forum.
eggie (2018-10-26 13:30:45+00:00): reverted by changeset  #63900723

een luchtfoto is per definitie onbetrouwbaar omdat de opnamehoek niet loodrecht is.
eggie (2018-10-26 13:34:36+00:00): Verzoek BAG import 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=722403#p722403
eggie (2018-10-26 13:38:30+00:00): Overigens wel netjes ingetekend :)
Leo Slager (2018-10-26 17:47:45+00:00): De tags zijn in overeenstemming met de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dwildlife_crossing
Dus de validatie-tool van JOSM bevat een foutje.
Pieter - Amsterdam (2018-10-26 17:50:48+00:00): Bedankt voor de geruststelling.
kartonage (2018-10-26 16:32:59+00:00): Hi taylor_bud, cubes_tx, Robert86us, Robert R or however you want to call yourself. I am getting a bit tired of this. (If it's not you  I apologize, but this is the exact behaviour by the mentioned accounts) (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6533292)
//
By your previous changeset it is pretty obvious that you try to tag for the renderer. I will politely refer you to the following wiki page for that issue: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
The object you are trying to add is already there. It is already there... Any program, website or user can get that data. Universities are by no means only displayed as areas, especially when multiple POIs share the same space. 
//
Now, you have created multiple accounts without ever trying to get in touch. I have given you enough oportunities and arguments, yet you insist on disregarding that. We could try getting a solution to this but you don't even acknowledge that something might be wrong or the way you are adding the area is suboptimal. You are ignoring data that is present and has been improved. You don't really seem to be interested in the quality of OSM and it's data. I'm pretty sure if you would actually engage in improving the data at present we could find something that would work or make it more accurate. From my perspective though, you are not interested and the way you are trying to force it is inaccurate.

Feel free to comment.

Best regards
mavl (2018-12-24 23:55:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
kartonage (2018-10-26 17:32:02+00:00): Hallo sccbm_koordinator,

ist diese Information über die Ereignisse/Geschichte vielleicht in irgendeiner Form (zB Gedenktafel am Gebäude) vor Ort vorhanden? Ohne ist es sonst etwas schwierig, solche Informationen wirklich passend unterzubringen. 

Schöne Grüße
mgpx (2018-10-26 18:45:19+00:00): The local OSM community has discussed this issue and does not approve the removal of this relation until a better quality landuse mapping is in place.
The community thinks that the old relation contains valuable parts, and it's removal is not a data quality improvement since your new mappings cover only a few percentage of this area. The community believes that a not-fully-accurate mapping is better than an empty map.

We encourage you to continue the landuse mapping, and you are free to remove the old polygons on those places (and only on those) what you properly covered with new mappings.

You are invited to join to the related discussions and share your view with the local community at the following ML:
openstreetmap-hungary@googlegroups.com
kartonage (2018-10-26 16:48:26+00:00): Hallo JasperAl,

die Art wie du die Bürgersteige angelegt hast, ist problematisch. Zum einen sind sie nicht mit dem Straßennetz verbunden und damit nicht zum Routen geeignet, zum anderen sollte man sich bei dieser Art genausten über Vorteile und Nachteile informieren. (zB https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig). Es gibt eine ganze Reihe an Diskussionen über dieses Thema. Dabei geht es vor allem darum, welchen Vorteil sowas bringt und ob es die Nachteile überwiegt. In Berlin wird es größtenteils nicht gemacht und nur an die Straßen getaggt (mehr dazu im Wiki). Gerade wenn nur ein Weg ohne weitere Beschreibungen erstellt wird finde ich den zusätzlichen Informationsgehalt eigentlich sehr gering im Vergleich zu den Problemen die dadurch entstehen. Während das bei Radwegen sehr erhebliche Schwierigkeiten hervobringen kann, ist vor allem eine überdachte Herangehensweise bei Gehwegen erforderlich. Deswegen vielleicht nochmal drüber nachdenken und sich das etwas anschauen. Verbunden werden muss es aber auf jeden Fall, weswegen ich überhaupt schreibe. Gerade für den Einstieg ist das vielleicht nicht immer ganz bewusst. :)

Bei Fragen gern fragen
Ansonsten happy mapping
JasperAl (2018-10-26 18:12:42+00:00): Hallo kartonage,

danke für den Hinweis. 
Bürgersteige sind nicht wirklich nötig. Da stimme ich dir zu. Ich war bisher nur der Ansicht, dass OSM eine sehr genaue Karte sei und Bürgersteige eigentlich dazu gehören sollten.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:37:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:46:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:39:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:00:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-27 05:37:32+00:00): Hi lynn nakiganda, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting many buildings which you mapped just a few days ago? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63901246
phidauex (2018-10-26 18:28:02+00:00): Hi David - Don't forget to correct the addr:street field to match the street naming in OSM - the church should be "Bolling Drive" rather than "E Bolling Dr". I missed this a few times on my DRCOG import cells, too!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63901423
mavl (2018-12-24 23:32:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-27 05:37:43+00:00): Hi lynn nakiganda, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting many buildings which you mapped just a few days ago? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63901643
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-27 05:38:05+00:00): Hi lynn nakiganda, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting many buildings which you mapped just a few days ago? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63901915
mavl (2018-12-24 17:13:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
ravalim (2018-10-30 16:50:58+00:00): Hello angys,

While working on Penang, i have come across a Dead end segment which is marked as Unclassified (Medium Priority), generally a segment leading to dead end should be with Low Priority(Residential).

Changeset No : 63902163 
Way ID : 637838161

Please let me know is there any update with the OSM Policies.

Thanks for you time and Help.

Regards,
Ravalim.
angys (2018-10-30 17:01:04+00:00): Fix, now tag as alley, feel free to report to me about any problems around Penang

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64018292
ravalim (2018-11-01 01:39:01+00:00): Hello angys,

Thanks for confirming my understanding .

Thanks,
ravali
gabro00 (2018-10-27 13:41:30+00:00): And what about the deleted multipolygons? Because it's an approved form of land use in the region. The point of the community is, that something is better than nothing, as discussed in the Hungarian mailing-list.  
You can draw anything on top of the land use relation, no problem with that. But deleting hundreds of square km of usable information (it is) is no-brainer vandalism.
Are you planning to redraw the affected area? (FYI, the #3061523 relation was restored 3(!) days ago, because of vandalism.)  If yes, please ignore the warning.
mgpx (2018-11-07 20:19:31+00:00): The local OSM community is highly disappointed that you are destroying valid map elements without comitting landuse improvements in the same area.
The community thinks that the old relation contains valuable parts and it's removal is not a data quality improvement. A not-fully-accurate mapping is better than an empty map, and the community is improving the old CLC polygons gradually, instead of destroying them completely.

Generally, it is not OK to delete valid data unless substituted with better quality data within the same CS.

The community is also disappointed that you are not responding to CS comments.

Your further actions for destroying valid data will be considered as vandalism and will be reported to the OSM Data Working Group (again).
Dr Udo Brömme (2019-03-07 19:33:21+00:00): mgpx's sentence "A not-fully-accurate mapping is better than an empty map" exposes him. Overlaying hundreds of square km with farmland landuse just to stain the map yellow is ... not very intelligent.