piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
streckenkundler (2022-09-21 06:56:25+00:00): Das ist der Beschluß zur Aufstellung, nichts weiter, da ist noch längst nichts entschieden!
Sowas nicht eintragen! das sind alles ungelegte Eier! Spruchreif wird das erst, wenn angefangen wird, zu bauen!

OSM ist keine Malkarte...
Fabian1429 (2022-09-21 07:09:28+00:00): Achso okay. Ich dachte das wäre die fertige Planung.
MxxCon (2022-09-21 06:37:59+00:00): Looking at that github repo, it seems like for now it's still only a proposed way of mapping, not exactly the defacto spec, so perhaps just be aware of it, but don't necessarily retag every single intersection that way?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126374881
Szewah (2022-09-21 11:46:35+00:00): Whilst the documentation has yet to be formalized, large parts of Seattle, that I can see, is mapped this way because there is a concerted effort to build a pedestrian routing system that is equitable for all.  Thus the need for distinction. I am not a part of this group there. However, it is also not "ground truth" to have the pedestrian crossing go all the way up onto the sidewalk, just so that it connects to the sidewalk. 
I'm happy to do as you suggest for now. I won't reedit the tags. Ongoing I'll keep editing these antenna as sidewalks.
Szewah (2022-09-21 11:54:30+00:00): Here are some more links for your reference about the drive to create better routing for pedestrians. 

https://2018.stateofthemap.us/program/inclusive-pedestrian-mapping-opensidewalks-accessmap-and-accessibility.html

https://tcat.cs.washington.edu/opensidewalks-2/
Szewah (2022-09-21 12:08:54+00:00): Also thanks for the bing map layer suggestion.
MxxCon (2022-09-21 15:47:47+00:00): NYC also has some effort to map sidewalks. We have quite a few people on osmus slack doing it. You are welcome to join to discuss these things and coordinate. Also there're map tasking manager projects such as https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/152 and https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/224 and I think more but can't kind it right now.
streckenkundler (2022-09-20 16:38:55+00:00): Quelle?
Fabian1429 (2022-09-20 16:41:14+00:00): Ups, vergessen.

https://www.neuhausen-spree.de/news/1/766562/nachrichten/aufstellung-eines-bebauungsplanes-%E2%80%9Esolarpark-kathlow-ii%E2%80%9C.html
streckenkundler (2022-09-21 06:57:20+00:00): Auch hier: Das ist der Beschluß zur Aufstellung, nichts weiter, da ist noch längst nichts entschieden!
Sowas nicht eintragen! das sind alles ungelegte Eier! Spruchreif wird das erst, wenn angefangen wird, zu bauen!

OSM ist keine Malkarte...
Fabian1429 (2022-09-21 07:09:47+00:00): Achso okay. Ich dachte das wäre die fertige Planung.
somix (2022-09-19 14:02:35+00:00): Hi! Shouldn't the tags be: highway=construction construction=service?
HellMap (2022-09-19 14:16:55+00:00): Heya!

As far as I remember, this used to be how less-than-complete road works  were tagged (i.e. the main `highway=x` keeps the tag).

But I see Wiki now says
"A deprecated option is to set the tag construction=yes." There are 4.9K uses of taginfo, so I am not sure when this was decided/changed. It does however suggest that `construction=minor` should be used for this particular purpose, so I'll change to that. There are 20.7K uses of that.

I didn't use `highway=construction` because the only major change currently is that they removed the top asphalt layer, leaving behind ground/sand/rocks, but there isn't any major work being done (at least, when I was here a couple times). I'm not sure if it's better to "close" the way with `highway=construction`. I have no idea if they intend to lay new asphalt or whatever else.

See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3357664.
rohieb (2022-09-19 13:59:29+00:00): siehe auch https://www.winterrodeln.org/wiki/Runstboden "Die eingezeichnete "Rodelhütte" ist nur für Mitglieder des Absamer Rodelvereins zugänglich."
gscholz (2022-10-01 08:58:54+00:00): This changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Linha 21 de abril" and "Sede Municipal":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-51.27162&lat=-28.87668&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126376153

I have fixed this now:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126851838#map=14/-28.8657/-51.2283&layers=C

Please watch out what you are doing.
Guido
AWaltrick (2022-10-01 11:37:59+00:00): Hi gscholz, at the boundary there was the message "Fix me", so I adjusted the boundary according to your real geographical boundary. If I caused any problems, please forgive me.
Hugs.
clay_c (2022-09-19 14:09:16+00:00): Oops, changeset comment should say "realign and add missing tags to streetcar lines"
mcliquid (2022-09-21 09:23:32+00:00): access=private reicht hier aus, da dies für alle Verkehrsmittel gilt. Die untergeordeneten Tags sind dann obsolete.
Ropino (2022-09-23 07:19:20+00:00): Hi,
bitte nutze für highway einen 'üblichen' Wert.
Siehe Wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
Hier dürfte es 'footway' sein, wenn "traffic_sign=DE239" stimmt.
Wenn "Fahrrad frei", dann ergänzt mit:
bicycle=yes
traffic_sign=DE:239,1022-10 
---
Oder 'path', wenn "traffic_sign=DE240 oder DE241"
---
Einen "cycleway" dürfte es dort mMn nicht geben.
VG
lukasprobst (2022-09-29 10:12:43+00:00): korrigiert, vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-11-27 10:42:04+00:00): Hoi.. Dit is ook een lastige. Het water heb ik losgemaakt van dat fietspad en in een multipolygoon gelegd als 'inners'. 
Je ziet anders alles door elkaar. 
Maak ook nooit vlakken water of landuse vast aan wegen. 

Paar keer ctrl f5 voor het effect
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126376714

MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
HellMap (2022-09-19 14:19:31+00:00): In response to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126375580.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
SCHLUMPFs (2022-09-19 14:34:23+00:00): edit: extended waterways and added bridges
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-26 08:59:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10036677135/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
Wurzel3 (2025-04-26 09:39:23+00:00): it is not a shop in the common sense, because then i would just have added it as a shop. 
it is a vehicle registration service, that is a category that is no really documented in OSM, that is why i added the fixme tag.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 08:50:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:government%3Dtransportation ?
Wurzel3 (2025-04-28 09:48:20+00:00): It could be tagged as this, but it is a private service provider and not a government service.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 11:33:08+00:00): vehicle registration service as service provider?

are they handling government registration for you? or is it about something else?

"not a government service" then not government tags for it
Wurzel3 (2025-04-28 12:38:48+00:00): "are they handling government registration for you?"
Yes exactly this
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-10 07:18:02+00:00): Is it their internal corporate office or place where you walk in from street to arrange this service?
Wurzel3 (2025-05-13 15:13:10+00:00): i don't know anymore, it has been over two years since i have been there.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 06:21:23+00:00): opened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4757844 then
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
alesarrett (2022-09-20 10:31:04+00:00): Ciao Edoardo, grazie per il tuo contributo! Ti segnalo solamente che quando disegni un edificio, puoi "raddrizzarlo", nel senso di fare in modo che gli angoli siano di 90° (cosa non sempre valida, ma generalmente sì) selezionando il perimetro dell'edificio e cliccando il tasto Q, oppure usando il tasto destro e cliccando sull'icona apposita.
Buon lavoro!
felipeeugenio (2022-09-20 19:05:02+00:00): Hola. El tag building es para el edificio, no para el recinto completo. saludos
Residentcl (2022-10-12 19:31:23+00:00): Hola, Espero que ahora este mejor y bien.
impiaaa (2022-09-19 16:10:47+00:00): Hello, and thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap! Some feedback: First, the changeset comment should describe what you changed or added, not just why—see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more info. Second, it's considered good practice to keep the covered area of your changeset small, and you can do that by saving your changes in one location before moving on to another. Finally, tennis courts should be tagged with "leisure=pitch"+"sport=tennis", not as a building or road. See the tag documentation here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch
flohoff (2022-09-20 15:07:15+00:00): Moin,
ist die Baustelle da aufgelöst oder ist das nur obwohl da noch Baustelle ist befahrbar? Und da stehen immer noch Ampeln?!?

Flo
jotzt (2022-09-20 15:45:19+00:00): Hallo Flo,
die Baustelle ist weg. Es wurde eine Bedarfsampel installiert, die Fußgänger und Radfahrer, die die Straße queren oder die Unterführung benutzen wollen. Rad- und Fußweg muss noch eingetragen werden.

Gruß
Jost
flohoff (2022-09-21 10:18:27+00:00): 
Also die Bedarfsampel sperrt den Autoverkehr DURCH den Tunnel oder die lässt das Queren der Enigerloher Straße vor und hinter der Unterführung zu. 

Macht einen unterschied bei den traffic signal tags.

Denn ein highway=traffic_signal sagt das hier Hauptsächlich der Autoverkehr reguliert wird und das wird im Routing/Navigation als "Penalty" einkalkuliert.

Wenn du da ein highway=crossing + crossing=traffic_signals draus macht dann ist das Hautpsächlich für die Fußgänger die auf anforderung beschützt werden und das hat im routing kein Penalty.

Flo
jotzt (2022-09-21 13:08:29+00:00): Letzteres, das Tagging ist also noch anzupassen.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 14:51:53+00:00): Ciao. Il sentiero 25A è senza cai_scale. Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 13:30:35+00:00): è vero, ma in questo caso l'informazione non era disponibile. Conosci tu il cai_scale giusto? Sarebbe utile metterlo. Saluti, Martin
highflyer74 (2022-09-21 12:22:59+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Hier und im Folgeänderungssatz wurde jeweils eine lange bestehende Radrouten Relation gelöscht. Nur um sicher zu gehen, dass das seine Richtigkeit hat: wurden diese ersatzlos gestrichen?

Hintergrund meiner Frage ist, dass wir bei OSM meist Dinge nicht löschen, sondern eher anpassen.

Sei so nett, dich einmal hier im Änderungssatz zu melden, damit wir gemeinsam die Lage verbessern können.

Wichtiger Hinweis auch:

Da du / ihr mutmaßlich "Kommunalverbund Niedersachsen/Bremen e.V." seid:

Sei so nett, euer Profil entsprechend zu kennzeichnen und mit Ansprechpartnern und Bearbeitern zu versehen, welche auf diesen Account Zugriff haben / mit ihm arbeiten.

Da wir bei OSM großen Wert auf Transparenz legen und ggf. bei Unstimmigkeiten einen Ansprechpartner brauchen, wäre das wichtig. Weitere Infos kann man hier nachlesen:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing

Viele Grüße!
Kommunalverbund (2022-09-22 13:31:56+00:00): Guten Tag, 
vielen Dank für die Hinweise. Der Grüne Ring Region Bremen wurde vollständig neukonzipiert, was die Löschung der bestehenden Radrouten Relation nötig machte. Das neue Radroutennetz soll nach und nach in OSM übertragen werden. 
In der Zwischenzeit können weitere Informationen auf der Webseite des Grünen Rings gefunden werden: 
www.gruener-ring-region-bremen.de. 
Viele Grüße, 
Kommunalverbund Niedersachen/Bremen e.V.
silversurfer83 (2022-09-27 09:41:48+00:00): Hallo und Herzlich willkommen bei OSM :)
Ich sehe, Du bist fleißig dabei Dinge zu aktualisieren. Das ist gut. Eine Bitte hätte ich: Deine Änderungskommentare sind nicht sehr aussagekräftig. Schau dir bitte mal folgende Seiten im Wiki an und vielleicht bist du ja bereit, da in Zukunft eine Kleinigkeit zu ändern :) Danke
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide

Weiter frohes Mappen
-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126380284
Tumtrah1 (2022-09-27 19:51:12+00:00): Hallo,
danke für dein Feedback.
In Zukunft werde ich es beachten
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126380284
ivanbranco (2022-09-19 19:21:06+00:00): Hi Patrick,

you dragged a node in this changeset. iD even tried to warning you something was wrong ("warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway"). Didn't you notice?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:52:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
lefuturiste (2022-09-19 15:38:56+00:00): changetset comment was: landuse and track roads work
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-09-19 18:04:46+00:00): Hi smarties,
bist Du Dir sicher, dass die Menge so weit im Nordwesten beginnt und dass die Menge über so weite Strecken durch Röhren unterm Acker verläuft?
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.