piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
berndw (2019-06-15 16:33:08+00:00): Hallo

Könntest Du bitte die Quelle dieser Einträge benennen?
MrWebber (2019-06-15 17:35:52+00:00): https://www.bvwp-projekte.de/strasse/B266n-G22-RP/B266n-G22-RP.html
berndw (2019-06-16 08:37:23+00:00): Danke für den Link
EneaSuper (2019-06-15 09:04:36+00:00): Ciao mattchia, secondo Taginfo il tag "stands" è utilizzato maggiormente rispetto a "bleachers", ma non so se sia più o meno corretto a livello linguistico:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=stands

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=bleachers
smootheFiets (2020-01-15 01:05:16+00:00): Bonjour Marcel64121,

Selon Osmose, l'attribut "duration" dans plusieres lignes de bus que tu as éditées n'est pas bon. Je suis tombé sur celui-là :

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#item=9014&zoom=17&lat=43.30709&lon=-0.335561&level=2&tags=&fixable=

... mais il y en a d'autres. Selon

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:duration?uselang=en

duration=31:00 signifie une durée de 31 heures. Je suppose que ça devrait être 31 minutes, plutôt ? Donc duration=00:31 ?

Qu'est-ce que t'en penses ?

Salut du Nord lointain,
MMMigo
Marcel64121 (2020-01-15 14:10:44+00:00): Oui effectivement, merci de me l'avoir signalé, je vais corriger tout ça
smootheFiets (2020-01-16 21:13:16+00:00): Merci de l'avoir signalé ! J'ai vu que tu as réparé quelques lignes de bus à Pau. Je me suis amusé à réparer les autres lignes, aussi. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79665597

Je suis en train d'apprendre l'utilisation d'Overpass, ça m'a valu un beau petit projet éducatif :)

En faisant cela, je suis tombé sur un autre souci : dans la signe 16 (rélations 9682010 et 9682011), il n'y a pas de "duration" mais "interval" de 28:00. Je suppose que ça devrait être duration=00:28 ? Et interval, alors ? 

Cordialement, MMMigo
smootheFiets (2020-01-16 21:15:02+00:00): PS : j'espère de n'avoir rien cassé ! Je ne suis vraiment pas expert des "relations" dans OSM...
mueschel (2019-06-19 08:01:25+00:00): Hi,
you created a huge parking lot here that overlaps with buildings, railroads and a bus terminal. I also can't find it in aerial images. Could you check that?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697158312

Jan
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-06-14 17:32:39+00:00): Olá Leonardo, pode explicar o motivo de ter eliminado elementos?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-06-14 17:33:36+00:00): edição anulada. os elementos não se apagam sem justifição
mueschel (2019-06-19 08:03:10+00:00): Hi,
these payment tags are not used in any other place:
payment:ep_id_brizzi=yes
payment:ep_id_flazz=yes
payment:ep_id_mandiri_emoney=yes
payment:ep_id_tapcash=yes

All of them exist already, but without the 'ep_', e.g. payment:id_tapcash. Could you fix that?

Thanks
Jan
abakus_uploader (2019-06-14 22:31:00+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
messpert (2019-09-16 11:28:31+00:00): Why have you changed Fore Down to heath? It is clearly a common, and is grassland. Did you not see the source tag indicating survey and local knowledge?
messpert (2019-09-16 11:34:03+00:00): I now see that you have marked nearly all of the Caradon area as "heath" as well. Have you been there? There are a few patches that might be called heath, but not the while area.
Russ (2019-09-16 14:15:09+00:00): Hi,

This was a while ago but I was not systematically retagging any existing landuse as heath in these changesets.

I was adding new landuse areas and in some cases I was rationalising the landuse boundaries based on aerial photography. Unfortunately this doesn't come across especially well in the changeset.

In the case of Fore Down specifically, it was tagged as leisure=common which is now a deprecated tag and no longer rendered by the default OSM style. We discussed this on talk-gb and we're now using designation=common for areas which are legally commons - more info here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:designation%3Dcommon

I believe I tagged it as heath because there was a nearby moorland area of similar appearance tagged as heath.

Sorry if this caused any issues, but these areas should be relatively easy to subdivide into smaller landuse areas if necessary. I will not be mapping around this area any more.
messpert (2019-09-19 14:30:48+00:00): Another quibble. You left the source tag as "local_knowledge; mapbox". But that was for the original mapping, not for your changes(s). So we now have wrong data apparently from "local_knowledge" which you don't seem to have.
messpert (2019-09-19 14:35:03+00:00): About the nearby areas marked as "heath". Many of those mistakes had been corrected. They too were from armchair mappers with no local knowledge or survey. If we have to give a natural tag on such a coarse scale, the best is "unimproved grassland". I can't find that tag for now, but I will change at least some of the mistakes to at least grassland when I have time.
messpert (2019-09-19 15:03:37+00:00): I have just come across Inn Down!
If you had looked at the history, you would have seen that I had corrected the original "heath" rubbish, yet you come along and reinstate it!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391660464
messpert (2019-09-19 15:17:10+00:00): You have also changed Twelve Men's Moor back to the ridiculous heath. I would have suspected vandalism if you had not replied.
messpert (2019-09-19 15:23:39+00:00): I see from one of your comments that you  are tagging for the renderer :-

'East Moor's delineation had disappeared from the map. Seems it was changed to "Natural" from "Heath", so wasn't rendering as a moorland. Changed back.'

That is horrific. Removing ground truth and replacing with an invention. This is not what OSM is about. We want a reliable honest map: not a series of inventions to make the rendering pretty.

If you don't like the rendering, fix that, not the facts on the ground.
CaroleMoreau (2019-06-14 14:44:44+00:00): Not finished!
I didn't map the roads...
PT-53 (2019-06-15 04:54:49+00:00): Hallo claudia10,
Du hast an diesem Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/421597380/history mit nur 2 Knoten einen Knoten gelöscht. Jetzt ist ein Way mit nur einem Knoten übrig, was so nicht korrekt ist.
OSM-Inspector:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=10.00603&lat=48.37511&zoom=18&opacity=0.76

CS-Kommentar fehlt ebenfalls.
PT-53 (2019-06-18 05:09:06+00:00): Hallo claudia10, 
kümmerst Du Dich noch darum?
PT-53 (2019-06-23 05:41:10+00:00): Hallo claudia10, 
Du hast den Ein-Knoten-Weg ja zwischenzeitlich gelöscht. Gut.
Eine Antwort wäre aber auch nschön gewesen.
Grüße
abrensch (2019-06-20 18:07:17+00:00): Hallo baum10,

die L504 hat da teilweise ihr highway-tag verloren, so dass sie jetzt ein Loch hat.

Schaust Du mal?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
Gppes (2019-06-22 12:35:46+00:00): Hallo, ich habe mal das Tag wieder ran gemacht, auf die Gefahr, dass das falsch ist, ich war ja nicht dort.
user_5359 (2019-06-16 16:35:36+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the both keys "asistida" and "cantidad aproximada de gatos"?
Yailen Carpio (2019-06-17 14:01:39+00:00): El término "asistida" se refiere a si esa colonia de gatos es atendida por alguna persona o un grupo de personas. Generalmente las colonias son asistidas por los vecinos del lugar, quienes les dan comida. Y "cantidad aproximada de gatos" se refiere a cuántos gastos (más o menos) hay en esa colonia, ya que a veces es muy complejo determinar la cantidad exacta
mueschel (2019-06-29 14:22:30+00:00): I don't think this is the kind of information that should be added to a geographical database like OSM. As this seems to be a community project with several people involved, could you please point us to the documentation provided by the leader of this mapping effort?
PT-53 (2019-06-16 13:43:21+00:00): Hallo dirtbikermp3,
Du hast diesen Kreisel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164827405/history als im Bau eingezeichnet.
wie weit ist denn der Baufortschritt und wo gibt es Infos dazu?

Fragende Grüße
dirtbikermp3 (2019-06-16 14:34:49+00:00): Hallo,
aktuell ist es eine Schotterwüste und man kommt nur mit dem MTB daran vorbei.
Fotos habe ich aber keine gemacht.
Für den Verkehr soll die vollständige Sperrung voraussichtlich wieder im August/September freigegeben werden.

Infos auch in der Presse:
https://www.kurier.de/inhalt.neuer-kreisverkehr-leuschnitzstrasse-in-bindlach-wird-gesperrt.1b7fcf85-1698-4090-85b7-b46f54d0554f.html?viaSSL=true

VG Joachim
PT-53 (2019-06-16 14:47:21+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Behälst Du die Baustelle im Auge?
Fragende Grüße
Hjart (2019-06-14 18:24:34+00:00): Looks like you just duplicated the existing line.
Thonixx (2019-06-19 08:28:04+00:00): Hey Hjart, as I am not a long time editor of OSM maps I might have mistaken how the ferry lines work. I tried to navigate a few days ago and it didn't route me via the existing ferry link. Then I have looked at the ferry line and saw that this takes you from Kristiansand to Hirtshals and not the other way around. So I am open for suggestions how this really should work to have one ferry line serving both directions between two ferry ports.

How should I proceed?
Hjart (2019-06-19 13:26:32+00:00): The existing line should normally work both ways, just like most roads do. OSM ferry routes appears fairly tricky though. It's not easy to figure out what will work with the various routers. I'll play around with it a bit in the coming days to try and figure out what can be done.
Thonixx (2019-06-20 11:28:11+00:00): Thanks.. Also I just saw that I might have done a mistake with a ferry line being in the wrong location? I am not sure though.
Hjart (2019-06-20 11:48:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=58.1504%2C7.9685%3B57.5861%2C9.9909 does appear to work quite well both ways. Which navigation tool did you use?
Thonixx (2019-06-20 22:13:44+00:00): I have used Magic Earth which has an Android and iOS app. This usually works quite well with navigation.

How can I revert this changeset? (Have used my GPS though for having an exact/realistic ferry as much as possible)
Hjart (2019-06-21 10:28:46+00:00): I reverted it already.
I've played around with Magic Earth a bit my self and I'm basically not sure why it would accept one ferry and not the other.
Would help if I could see what was in their database.
RicoElectrico (2019-06-15 10:17:29+00:00): Hi, I corrected your edit.:

http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=6547947682

It makes sense to write addresses in Polish, if you're in Poland ;-)
DieErdbeertante (2019-06-15 10:34:19+00:00): Yes thank you. This is my first time doing this :)
mavl (2019-10-25 17:05:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76218999 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3227].
southglos (2019-06-15 09:34:49+00:00): Hi

Several questions about this changeset - you've deleted a school and replaced it with woodland, and have deleted playgrounds and suchlike, all of which still appear to exist on the latest imagery.  Can you explain, please?

Also, changeset comments are supposed to describe what you've done to the map.  Most of yours seem to be "dvr used", which I don't understand, and I'm really not sure what "dvr harddrive fault" is all about?

Are these genuine changes, mistakes while editing, or should I revert?
user_5359 (2019-06-15 15:06:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the garage.
eggie (2019-06-14 16:14:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-06-14 16:19:18+00:00): Beste mapper,

Nu staat er nog steeds shop=gift. Dat zal vast niet kloppen.
Je kunt nog toevoegen
website= https://www.spalhuus.nl/
en de juiste tag die de aard van het spalhuus duidt.
Zoek onder wiki even onder health_care

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-14 16:20:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare
Leo Slager (2019-06-15 10:41:34+00:00): En de naam stemt niet overeen met het vermelde op de website.
Leo Slager (2019-06-15 16:11:15+00:00): Nmm zit daar geen café.
Wel een kapsalon en 3 therapeuten.
Graag een reactie.
Leo Slager (2019-06-15 16:16:21+00:00): Of zijn die 4 al weer vertrokken ?
Leo Slager (2019-06-15 21:51:23+00:00): shop=gift verwijderd
amenity=pub toegevoegd
literan (2019-06-14 16:05:08+00:00): извините, вы некорректно поправили. Поставили на часть дома теги всего дома. Теперь у нас два контура с одинаковыми тегами здания и одним и тем же адресом. Придется откатить. Для новичков мультиполигоны сложно
messpert (2019-09-16 11:39:30+00:00): Craddock Moor?? The whole area? And yet more "heath" ?

Craddock Moor is just a section in the SW. 

Again, there are some portions that might be described as "heath", but decidedly not the whole area.
Russ (2019-09-16 14:18:53+00:00): Please see my comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71255822 regarding natural=heath.

I don't believe the name Craddock Moor was tagged here at all prior to my changes. 

I tagged the area based on OS OpenData Street View, which does not provide an exact area but does label this broad area as Craddock Moor. Feel free to split this area if you believe it's too broad.
Vlad (2019-08-31 10:43:21+00:00): les isolignes ne décrivent pas des falaises. Merci de supprimer les fausses falaises de ce changeset.
D'une manière générale les modèle numériques de terrain ne doivent pas être importés dans OpenStreetMap. Merci bien

Isolinien beschreiben keine Klippen. Bitte entfernen Sie die gefälschten Klippen dieses Changeets.
Im Allgemeinen sollten digitale Feldmodelle nicht in OpenStreetMap importiert werden. Vielen Dank.
Carto'Cité (2019-06-21 17:00:56+00:00): Bonjour Evane,
J'ai repassé ce way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263695056 en cycleway. Si tu pense que je me tromte n'hésite pas à me dire :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
viloan (2019-06-14 16:30:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-06-16 16:47:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: We use lowercase (britisch English) keys. And the combination landuse and building is very (!) unusually.
mueschel (2019-06-19 08:31:40+00:00): Hi,
you added some "Kopje" tags to buildings. These are not used anywhere else. What do they mean?

Jan
Baloo Uriza (2019-07-29 14:52:25+00:00): +1-580-772-8808 is the format used for phone numbers in OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71260534
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-15 08:26:12+00:00): Hi JS0102, welcome to OSM.

and again, may I know the reason behind deleting several mapped service ways and amenity areas? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71260806

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
blackboxlogic (2019-06-23 03:45:55+00:00): I'm new. What is the purpose of node 358234549?
WinterB (2019-07-26 17:33:37+00:00): It was put back to keep node history while reducing it's purpose to an address node.I did not remove the GNIS tags since I was mostly just restoring the history of known post offices that were deleted due to the Historic labeling. 
The address is correct so at the very least it would continue it's life as an address node. The building at that address still exists so having the details in the node that it's recognized as a historic building is also useful information.
In this instance the post office has moved but the road is also referred to in resources by it being an old post office road as well.
mueschel (2019-06-15 10:05:53+00:00): Hallo,
du verwendest hier Tags wie 
railway:signal:speed_limit:distant
Vor 'distant' kommt üblicherweise kein Doppelpunkt sondern ein Unterstrich,
railway:signal:speed_limit_distant

Ich habe das gerade korrigiert in 24 Keys.
Geogast (2019-07-25 22:12:46+00:00): Olá, danctc! Neste e em outros changesets você desenhou muitos quilômetros de faixas exclusivas de ônibus como vias separadas. Faixas só se desenham como vias separadas se tiverem uma *separação física* das demais faixas. Não é o caso da Av. Senador Teotônio Vilela ou da Av. Atlântica. têm três faixas, uma para ônibus (psv) e duas para carros. Hoje andei por ai. A única separação é uma linha branca. E olha só que a existência da faixa exclusiva ja estava inserida, a saber nos tags das Avenidas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/252552334; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191731087. Agora até tem redundância nos dados. Grato, Daniel
stevea (2019-06-18 20:49:49+00:00): Thank you (yet again) for your contributions, Mr. Snow!
AndrewSnow (2020-01-20 05:57:17+00:00): I neglected to properly respond with a thank you Steve for all your contributions.  I would love to clean up the mountain edges of SC more but am challenged by the imagery as we all are.  I continue to edit around where I am in town and hope you will continue to also.
AS
stevea (2020-01-20 08:26:33+00:00): Thanks for your kind reply; better late than...yeah.

There are a lot of "edges" on Earth, around here are indeed some challenging ones.  I'm glad so many of us keep busy working on them, where-ever they may be.  Steve
Mazaud Thomas (2019-06-14 18:55:01+00:00): Lien coupé dans la description: https://www.aggloroanne.fr/fileadmin/Aggloroanne.fr/6_Documents/Actualites/2017/Bords_de_Loire/Panneaux-Bords-de-Loire-4.jpg
Glassman (2019-06-14 23:28:36+00:00): Tip: try not to connect unrelated features like the commons area and the street. It makes it difficult to modify features later on. Unfortunately our editors like to snap to nearby features.

I also added landuse=grass to your two areas so they will render. unfortunately leisure=commons doesn't render.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71264174
smaprs (2019-06-14 21:57:50+00:00): Why did you delete this river:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384245084/history

Exactly the same deleted few days ago, here:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70442555  
Have you read those comments?    
  
Are you using sock puppet account?  
  
So?
smaprs (2019-06-14 23:45:45+00:00): Please read and answer comment about your editions.  
This is good practice in OSM.   
  
Also:   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map   
  
Also the comment at:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70528771
smaprs (2019-06-15 00:02:33+00:00): Another point:  
MAXAR is a prived company that provide satellite image.   

Digital Globe, which was accquired by MAXAR, provided license for OSM:   
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DigitalGlobe#Legal_permissions  
  
But:  
there's no DG anymore.  
MAXAR is the new owner.   
  
Does OSM have such explicit accordance of MAXAR to use images for mapping under OSM's conditions? If not, you can't use MAXAR's data nor images.
smaprs (2019-06-15 00:10:20+00:00): Ok for MAXAR, it's being provided by default in JOSM by now.
interdite (2019-06-15 23:43:27+00:00): @smaprs Better think twice before writing. Then you don't have to correct yourself.
smaprs (2019-06-16 00:19:28+00:00): Who did wrong, to correct?  
Where is this the other stretch of that long river that was mapped?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384245084   
Much better think twice before simply deleting and not replacing what was there before. Right?  
  
Will you add that previous extension? Preserving its history of editions, as ugood practice? It's not hard to do.
roleohibachi (2019-06-14 20:36:37+00:00): I think I did the bike lane wrong. It should be on the south side of the road, eastbound only.
ke9tv (2019-06-15 17:05:17+00:00): The forward direction of Navarre Avenue is westbound, and you placed a bicycle lane on the left (south) side. That appears to match your intention.

I don't know the situation on the ground, but in the aerials I have, it looks as if there are bike lanes on both sides starting just east of the viaduct?

You didn't break the SR 2 relation. (It's broken elsewhere, and I'll let the locals deal with it where it's broken.)
literan (2019-06-15 11:56:30+00:00): One of removed buildings exists: https://yandex.ru/maps/213/moscow/?l=map%2Cstv%2Csta&ll=37.535014%2C55.736812&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=328.767803%2C4.375000&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=37.561495%2C55.751717&panorama%5Bspan%5D=119.012723%2C80.000000&spn=0.005043%2C0.000780&z=13 Please be careful with such edits
Phyks (2019-06-17 12:23:34+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM,

Il manque le tag principal pour décrire la nature exact de cet objet sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6548326121.

En l'occurrence, j'ai l'impression qu'il s'agit d'un magasin d'informatique et donc shop=computer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcomputer ou office=it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office seraient probablement adaptés.

N'hésitez pas à répondre ici ou par messagerie privée si vous avez des questions sur mes remarques ou la façon de corriger.

Bonne journée,
Phyks (2019-06-17 12:24:12+00:00): Bonjour,

Même remarque que pour mon autre message, il manque un attribut principal. Sûrement une valeur de office ici, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office.

Bonne journée,
Phyks (2019-06-17 12:26:44+00:00): Bonjour,

Même remarque, il manque l'attribut principal sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6548341525 (sûrement office=quelque chose).

Le site web de cette entreprise pourrait être ajoutée avec la clé "website" (d'ailleurs, une fois un attribut principal renseigné correctement, le formulaire devrait s'adapter pour faciliter l'ajout d'informations de contact etc).

Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/548379899, quelle est la délimitation du site économique des lacs ? Tel qu'ajouté actuellement, cela correspond au seul bâtiment sélectionné, mais il est possible que les bâtiments voisins soient également dans ce site.

Bonne journée,