piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gileri (2020-09-26 13:20:29+00:00): Top merci !
gileri (2020-09-26 13:24:09+00:00): Il y a la possibilité (et c'est recommandé) d'indiquer sur quelles sources on s'est basé pour faire les modifications.

Au moment de la sauvegarde, juste en dessous du commentaire, il suffit d'ajouter "Source" et de remplir le champ.

Ici, si c'était en étant "sur le terrain" il y a la valeur "survey" qui est utilisable.

Plus d'infos ici :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:source#Sources_ordinaires_couramment_utilis.C3.A9es_pour_l.27.C3.A9dition_manuelle
DP24PH (2020-09-27 09:06:35+00:00): DP24 #Mapping101 ALERT: It seems that SB 419 got into unwanted alteration affecting most bus, PUV routing (including P2P Bus DA, DM; City Bus 27D, 28). Likewise, JOSM is hereby recommended for troubleshooting processes.
Max-Kritic (2020-09-28 07:24:09+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ThfOHUcUYCIGOUFGgACfQ4
Max-Kritic (2020-09-28 07:25:17+00:00): Les plies roues ne sont pas des parkings vélo.
kapazao (2020-09-26 11:34:09+00:00): Hello, please read building imports page in spanish community wiki in OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spanish_Cadastre/Buildings_Import/Import_guide) before continue your building imports. You are doing incorrect edits because you don't use PNOA imagery and your geometry is bad positioned. If you continue doing this without giving an answer or fixing your last edits, your changes can be removed or you can be reported.
I hope you can understand that this is a lot of work to check by other users.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91545407
Fra00 (2020-09-26 10:17:01+00:00): Hi. You moved the underpass to a wrong position: a new underpass was built not far away and is now to be tagged as a residential street. You can see the new position in Esri or in Google Maps.
SekeRob (2020-09-26 10:30:38+00:00): OK See it now.and reverted.
And kindly put in your comments what you change instead of the meaningless "sistemazione...". As per the wiki that's the purpose of the field.
Fra00 (2020-09-26 11:13:40+00:00): Okay, but please, be more careful when editing. Do not just discard other users' edits, but instead try to understand them, especially if you have to use use sat images and not direct experience: better sat images are almost always less up-to-date, so cross checking is recommended.
SekeRob (2020-09-26 11:40:05+00:00): BTW, what's wrong with almost everywhere the asphalt and lane counts are missing. You changed the driveway, to residential, but did not fill in these 2 tags. I try to cover all tags while editing something.
The traffic signs on max height might be wrong too now as one cannot see if the culvert was deepened. If 'everyone uses it' that must have changed.
Fra00 (2020-09-26 12:10:12+00:00): I only add information I'm sure about. I do not know what the new max height is, so I can't do anything about it. I could add surface and other elements, of course, but if I don't it doesn't mean everything else I do is wrong and must be reverted.
mavl (2020-10-19 14:46:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет объекты, которые существуют на местности. Объекты можно удалять из OpenStreetMap, если они больше не существуют.  
Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете пакете правок, отменены.  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
Herr Kramer (2021-09-13 13:45:19+00:00): Schönen guten Tag Natura,

habe soeben deinen Hinweis gesehen. Warum soll der Abriss/Neubau der Würdebachbrücke nicht als "construction" getaggt werden? Der Neubau zieht sich nun schon länger als neun Monate. Geplante Fertigstellung ist bis Ende 2021 angesetzt und danach (2022) die Sanierung der Albert-Heise-Straße.

LG
Natura (2021-09-13 14:42:02+00:00): Weil dann u.A. gedruckte Karten fehlerhaft sind- für immer!
Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction
Herr Kramer (2021-09-14 12:16:21+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Ich habe mich diesbezüglich an das Forum gewandt, da ich dieses Thema für diskussionswürdig halte und eine Klärung für notwendig halte.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73544

LG
Luzandro (2023-04-27 18:10:40+00:00): Hallo,

"Unbenanntes Gerinne" ist kein Name, ich habe diesen daher entfernt.

siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/unbenannte-gerinne/98249
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91546161
mavl (2020-10-19 14:45:48+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет объект, который существует на местности. Объекты можно удалять из OpenStreetMap, если они больше не существуют.  
Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете пакете правок, отменены.  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
osmviborg (2020-09-26 11:01:11+00:00): Hej. Venligst aldrig rette eller slette adressepunkterne. Adresseoplysninger på bygninger bruges ikke DK. Jeg har tilpasset dine rettelser.
Dafnie (2020-09-26 13:03:24+00:00): Super, så har jeg lært noget.. :-)

Tak for hjælpen.
aharvey (2020-09-27 05:56:08+00:00): I've unglued the power line which you glued to the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91570584
aharvey (2020-09-27 05:58:32+00:00): also highway=service + service=driveway is the tag to use for these driveways I've fixed that up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91570614 see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway
abrensch (2020-10-09 10:51:04+00:00): Hallo DHuthmann,

mir ist hier nicht mehr klar, wie der Süd-Nord Verkehr lokal umgeleitet wird. Muss der wirklich ganz aussen rum?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
DHuthmann (2020-10-12 20:34:57+00:00): Hallo Arndt,
für die nächsten Wochen führt die Umleitung von Süd nach Nord über Redlin, Osteroda und dann Neunaundorf. Von dort wurde ein ländlicher Weg zur Umleitung ausgebaut. Das gilt allerdings nur für PKW. Die LKW werden bereits ab Langennaundorf über Uebigau, Falkenberg, Großrössen nach Herzberg umgeleitet. Der Verkehr vom Norden nach Süden wird weiterhin durch die Baustelle geleitet.

Gruss, Dirk
puchaczowsky (2021-01-07 22:30:00+00:00): Po co te nazwy "budynek"? Przecież to wiadome
Cristoffs (2021-01-08 17:38:25+00:00): Do wywalenia taka nazwa.
eggie (2020-09-26 11:46:59+00:00): Top!
marc__marc (2025-09-19 20:34:40+00:00): Hello,
maxweight 	3.5
maxweight:conditional 	no @ (weight>3.5)
what's the meaning ?
Regards,
Marc
marc__marc (2025-09-19 20:47:24+00:00): it look like maxweight:conditional no @ destination
muchichka_s (2020-09-26 13:43:14+00:00): Reverted
eggie (2020-09-26 11:54:15+00:00): Dag Daan. Toiletten 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets

Dus amenity=toilets
access=customers 
 en kijk voor windsurfing naar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dwindsurfing
MVG,
eggie
SHARCRASH (2020-09-28 19:57:22+00:00): Hello! Please be careful with the edits you do https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7823516806/history
Thanks for the comprehension! :)
alester (2020-09-26 14:19:42+00:00): Did you do a site visit and confirmed that the name has changed? Like I said in my comment on the note, the signage said "Cowichan Lake Sports Arena" a couple of months before the note was added, and was skeptical that the reported name change had occurred. If you confirmed that it has, then so be it.
user_5359 (2020-09-26 13:48:33+00:00): hello! Please check the way https://www.osm.org/way/851786919/history . I change your key "(new tag)" to name.
CartoKees (2020-11-06 21:26:49+00:00): Hallo Commodoortje,

Bij de rotonde staat het straatnaambordje Beatrixpark. Voor zover ik weet heet deze weg ook zo. Er is in juni ook een vergunning afgegeven voor Beatrixpark 9 (zie ook BAG viewer) aan deze weg. Wat is jou bron/reden om dit Tuberweg te noemen?

CartoKees
Commodoortje (2020-12-06 07:21:34+00:00): Ik denk dat je gelijk hebt CartoKees op de paal van de rotonde staat het straatnaambordje Beatrixpark, vandaar dat ik het heb aangepast, maar.....
De BAG viewer geeft wel degelijk Tuberweg aan. Ook de BGT laat Tuberweg verschijnen.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?searchQuery=7101BE&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=0294010000420343&objectId=0294200000420342&geometry.x=245123.1134375&geometry.y=444438.0196875&zoomlevel=5
.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0314m0csq7qf32v/2020-12-06_08-12-59.jpg?raw=1
.
Ik heb inmiddels wel de serviceweg naar Tuberweg 2 toegevoegd.
Commodoortje (2020-12-06 07:23:42+00:00): Wel even interessant, is de vergunning voor nummer 9 al afgegeven? Dit is Obelink, naar mijn weten is er bezwaar gemaakt door partijen
CartoKees (2020-12-06 12:18:18+00:00): Klopt inderdaad. De vergunning is al wel verleend (https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/#?geometry.x=245143.6534375&geometry.y=444429.8796875&zoomlevel=6&objectId=0294100000437272&detailsObjectId=0294010000437274) maar hoe het met het bezwaar staat weet ik niet.
CartoKees (2020-12-06 12:23:56+00:00): Voordat de weg van het ziekenhuis naar de N319 was dat stuk weg een oprit of weg naar nummer 2. Ik vermoed dat in de BGT het label voor de straatnaam (nog) niet is aangepast. In het Nationaal wegenbestand is denk de koppeling gemaakt met nummer 2 die aan de weg ligt. 
Ik heb nog gezocht naar een straatnaambesluit maar niet gevonden. Wel gevonden: " verbindingsweg Beatrixpark, welke de N319 (Groenloseweg) en de Rondweg West met elkaar verbind." (planviewer.nl/imro/files/NL.IMRO.0294.BP1803BTPARKACHTER-OW01/t_NL.IMRO.0294.BP1803BTPARKACHTER-OW01.html).
highflyer74 (2020-12-02 19:55:55+00:00): Moin! 

Ist schon etwas her, aber ich bin gerade über diese Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2449648 gestolpert. Hast Du die zufällig erstellt? Mir fiel auf, dass Du in dieser Änderung versucht hast, den Blitzer zu mappen. Allerdings funktioniert das so nicht. Alle Dinge in OSM müssen nach festgelegten Schemata (Tags) erfasst werden. Sonst können sie von Software nicht ausgewertet werden. In diesem Fall wurden diese Tags einem Node des Radwegs hinzugefügt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1988949412), was zum einen sachlich falsch ist, aber auch tagging-technisch nicht richtig. Ich würde gern den Blitzer korrekt erfassen und brauche dafür detaillierte Angaben (siehe verlinkte Note). Kannst Du mir vielleicht weiterhelfen?
muchichka_s (2020-09-26 13:03:34+00:00): Malfunction, reverted
Ltrlg (2020-09-26 11:46:28+00:00): Erreur de source : Esri pour les formes, BDOrtho IGN n’a servi que pour le calage, puisque les deux sont légèrement décalées.
totera (2020-09-27 22:38:32+00:00): Il tag place=hamlet era già presente nei nodi, che riportano anche il nome
Dan_Fi (2020-10-06 09:26:33+00:00): Hallo Miko,
durch die Änderung hast Du leider die Straßenführung der Brühlstrasse komplett verschoben.
Ich werde den Verlauf auf den ursprünglichen Zustand zurücksetzen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91549097
Cucazer (2020-09-26 12:31:49+00:00): Uhm, this is rendering not as I've planned. Maybe splitting the forest is the better option...
tux67 (2020-09-26 15:04:39+00:00): Aus welcher Dokumentation stammt denn "bridge_name"? Sowohl die englische als auch die deutsche Doku zeigen "name" für den Eigennamen der Brücke.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Bridge_Name hat den Status "abandoned".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91550120
eggie (2020-09-26 14:16:53+00:00): Dag sconijn.. Denk dat lanes=1 er wel af kan.
Gr eggie
RajSarkar (2020-09-26 13:17:17+00:00): wowowoowow
eggie (2020-09-26 14:26:51+00:00): Dag Robert.. Je hebt nu zonder changeset-commentaar alle adresinfo van het kadaster verwijderd van de adresnode.
Alles is import vanuit het Kadaster.
Waarom?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-26 14:29:56+00:00): reverted by Wijzigingenset #91553593
Edeschnur (2020-11-08 14:47:46+00:00): Hallo Arnaldur,

mit Ihrer Änderung ist glaube versehendlich ein Hydrand verschoben wurden.

jetzt: Standort: 51,5549454, 10,3898854 (außerhalb mitten im Feld)
vorher: Standort: 51,5501288, 10,3796072 (Zwinger Winkel in der nähe von HsNr. 69
Arnaldur (2020-11-09 10:00:48+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Das war ein Versehen und wurde korrigiert.
PlaneMad (2020-09-27 02:28:59+00:00): Looks like you might have missed adding the school tag to the object so its not showing up.
gographer (2020-12-13 11:59:28+00:00): Thanks @PlaneMad. I'm still learning and exploring the different tools. Also, as I was marking the boundary - I thought it unwise to add building type tag. But now I have added. Let me know if I should keep it.
dgitto (2020-09-26 17:32:19+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2020-09-26 17:33:42+00:00): I cognomi vanno con iniziale maiuscola.
dgitto (2020-09-26 17:41:02+00:00): ciao, il tag office=trasporti_pubblici non esiste in OSM. Si tratta di una agenzia di viaggi o è qualcosa di diverso?
Taichi853 (2020-09-27 07:17:31+00:00): è l'agenzia che si occupa del trasporto pubblico, non so se si può definire agenzia di viaggi
Diógenes de Sinope (2020-09-29 22:25:52+00:00): HI Sanal Piscinas, a better tag for the type of node you established in this changeset would be 'shop=swimming_pool' -https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dswimming_pool - for a store that sells swimming pool products
dgitto (2020-09-26 17:44:44+00:00): come vedrai in qualunque città, il tag name per le fermate riporta solo il nome della fermata (senza preporre "fermata")
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
mmd (2021-11-03 10:50:50+00:00): Curious about the HTML code in the description tag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238048085 - was it really intended this way?
TheSwavu (2021-11-03 19:42:53+00:00): I think this is some import junk from much earlier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/17847440
AlbyDangles (2021-11-05 11:45:57+00:00): I am sorry but these rivers and streams aren't my work just some of the roads and maybe bridges.
SekeRob (2020-09-26 14:09:33+00:00): Just explain to me what's wrong with the phone numbers I enter 'non standard key', no spaces. no separation signs, no international prefix. If you don't I'll likely make the mistake again and again and keep irritating you. At any rate it looks now exactly as I put it in.
user_5359 (2020-09-26 14:12:51+00:00): Hi, telephone is not define key, the standard key is phone (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:phone). Please use also the international number format.
SekeRob (2020-09-26 14:40:18+00:00): Lol, yet it's offered in the dropdown. I'll think about it next time, maybe legacy.

Wish the top drop down list when you start a creation had more than speed, city limit and stop, no entry is another highly frequently missing sign and there are more.
sconijn (2020-09-26 14:00:24+00:00): De lijn is een beetje rommelig, die zal ik in een volgende changeset vereenvoudigen.
eggie (2020-09-26 14:24:12+00:00): Review.. Volgens mij aardig gelukt. 
Nu je JOSM gebruikt kijk ook eens naar 
gebruik van de BGT omtrekgericht als transparant op de achtergrond.
BGT implementeren 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM. 
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg

Gr eggie
dgitto (2020-09-26 17:48:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Il tag NAME su un oggetto va usato solo se questo ha un nome proprio, senza usare descrizioni e simili.
"piscina privata hotel sabbie d'oro" non è un nome proprio. Di solito le piscine non hanno un nome!
dgitto (2020-09-26 17:51:18+00:00): inoltre l'hotel era già mappato a quanto pare. ovviamente il tag tourism=hotel deve apparire una sola volta, altrimenti risulteranno 3 hotel con questo nome a cefalù
osmviborg (2020-09-26 14:50:40+00:00): If you want to draw buildings in DK, in ID 'Press B' and select 'SDFE Skærmkort'. This will show you the right footprint of the building.
cehceh (2020-09-26 16:29:37+00:00): Hi osmviborg,
thank you for the hint! 
But why this? Missing buildings are not shown in SDFE Skærmkort. So I use SDFE aerial imagery. Is there any reason to avoid this?
Greetings, Matthias
Hjart (2020-09-26 17:14:51+00:00): When you only have aerial imagery, especially with with tall buildings it can be really hard to get the footprint right. So if the building is in SDFE Skærmkort, it can be really helpfull.
Personally I find it way more fun to use aerial imagery only (most buildings in OSM doesn't necessarily have to be super accurate), but now and then realize I have to use SDFE Skærmkort to get building footprints right.
osmviborg (2020-09-26 17:28:18+00:00): If buildings are not shown on 'SDFE Skærmkort'  then use aerial imagery.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-09 09:38:10+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you've added a "runway" and an "aerodrome".  There are a number of problems - firstly, neither exist any more.  I was in Tockwith a few weeks ago, and I'm sure I would have noticed had a series of WW2 bombers flown overhead. 
 The former location of both is clear on the imagery, and the former runway isn't even where you added it.  Secondly, "Marston Moor (ex RAF Tockwith)" is not a name, it is a description.  Thirdly, the site that you are copying data from appears not to be licence-compatible with OSM.  We (the DWG) will need to go through where you have used sources such as this and remove what you have added.  We can't just copy things from random websites into OSM where those random websites actually use Google themselves.  Fourthly, please always use meaningful changeset comments.  Don't just add things with no comment at all, as you did here.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-11 11:21:19+00:00): Replying to the points above individually: With regard to " I know for a fact that the operator of ukairfieldguide will carefully compare as many sources of information as available; and if he does rely heavily on G, he will carefully analyse the historical information that it offers. "
Unfortunately if a website is dependent on data from Google such as positional information then you shouldn't use that website in order to add data to OSM, as some of Google's IP will be present in the data on that website.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-11 11:39:01+00:00): Even though the evidence prevented for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7944948084 on http://www.ukairfieldguide.net/airfields/Marston-Moor is literally 2 screenshots from Google Earth, more relevant here is arguably the point which I tried to make in my first paragraph, but which appears to have flown over your head (sorry).
Do you genuinely believe that if there was an ex-RAF airfield in the UK still in use for general aviation that it would not already be in OSM as an airfield?  I grew up around here, and the many former RAF bases were a major feature of the landscape.  50 years on they're still there, usually redeveloped as something else but usually, as here, the former location is clearly visible.  On aerial imagery such as Bing's (which is OK to use within OSM) you can clearly see the former runways and taxiways underneath the kart tracks and circuit - not where you have added the "runway" in a field to the north.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-11 11:42:55+00:00): OpenStreetMap is a collaborative map.  The quality of the end result depends on everyone adding things that really exist and not engaging in "fantasy mapping" (such as interpreting linear features as runways when they are not).  People adding things that do not exist devalues the work of all of the people who take care to only add things to OSM that actually do.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-11 11:48:56+00:00): On the changeset comment question, a good changeset comment here would have been "Adding aerodrome based on XYZ website and adding runway based on the interpretation of a linear feature as a runway", if that explains what you actually did.
With regard to names, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only is clear - there should be no need for further discussion.  "People somewhere else are also doing it wrong" is not a good argument.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-11 11:56:15+00:00): With regard to ' I quite regret your phrase "We will need to go through..." no, there is no _need_ for you to do whatever, there only may be a wish or an impulse or an intention', ensuring that OSM isn't tainted by licence-infringing material is referred to at the very top of https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group under "what we do".  It's not in any way optional - if we leave information in OSM that is known to come from an incompatible source then the continuing project is at risk.
Best Regards,
Andy (both a local mapper and DWG member)
Jan Olieslagers (2020-10-11 12:01:00+00:00): Again, please do feel free to update as appropriate. I do accept local knowledge as a prine source of information, I promise I will not contest your updates.
But, yes, I do have found quite a few ex-WW RAF bases that were reported as "closed" or "disused" by all and sundry, only to find that limited aviation still happens there, sometimes using a former taxiway for a runway.
I remain convinced that there is no "one rule fits all", each situation requires individual scrutiny. Please be convinced that I do, field after field. Of course I am not claiming I cannot make a mistake; which may well be the case here.
Arma IRM-ED (2021-07-07 09:13:15+00:00): halo, AlejandroAlba
Confía en que has hecho tu mejor esfuerzo

Descubrí que sus objetos (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/851822587, https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/851822586) están cruzando carreteras. Ya que necesita conocimiento local, ¿le importaría arreglarlo? ¿O tienes alguna sugerencia para solucionarlo? Gracias
Rainero (2020-09-27 21:05:44+00:00): Hallo Peter Niederberghaus,

willkommen bei OSM mit der ersten Änderung!
Da das Luftbild ist an der Stelle nicht so deutlich ist: zweispurig heißt, daß es ein Weg ist, der mit (forstlichen) Kfz befahren werden kann, richtig?. Dafür wäre dann highway=track richtig, highway=path ist für Wege, die zu Fuß oder mit dem Fahrrad nutzbar sind. In der Vorlage im iD Editor gibt es dafür direkt unter "Pfad" "Feld-/Waldweg". Die Steigung brauch man nur angeben, wenn ungleich 0.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
mueschel (2020-09-29 13:47:24+00:00): Hi,
could you check this church? You changed the 'name' to 'dei'.
smb1001 (2020-09-29 13:53:41+00:00): Good spot, thanks. The hazards of editing lots of churches repetitively!
Fasse (2020-09-30 05:49:36+00:00): Hallo sr0808 und herzlich Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. 

Ein kleiner Hinweis noch zu deiner Änderung. Du hast die Homepage unter dem Tag description angegeben. Ich habe das geändert auf das Tag website . Das ist genau dafür gedacht.

Viele Grüße
Fasse
eggie (2020-09-26 15:10:36+00:00): Beste BrugN.

Dit zal toch niet de officiële naam zijn van dit gebouw en het zal toch ook geen Engelse naam hebben?
wellicht description= Voormalig Theehuis gebruiken ipv name=
MVG,
Eggie
dgitto (2020-09-26 17:53:47+00:00): attenzione, anche il supermercato era duplicato
eggie (2020-09-26 15:28:01+00:00): Dag JPB  
Om te voorkomen dat je brandpoorten ongewenst gaan mee routeren voor fietsers kun je die stukken ook de tag access=private geven.
Nu worden fietsers in de routeplanner er gewoon doorheen gestuurd. 
Trottoirs met een groenstrook tussen tijbaan en voetpad zou je denk ik beter als highway=footway kunnen taggen. Want ook hier routeert het anders voor tweewielers.
Denk dat die parallelpaden duidelijk voor voetgangers zijn bedoeld.
Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
Jan-Peter (2020-09-28 06:01:39+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Dank voor je opmerkingen. Je hebt volkomen gelijk en heb het eea zoveel mogelijk aangepast. Bij ons in de wijk zijn de meeste 'stoepen' inderdaad door een groenstrook gescheiden van de rijbanen. 
Brandgangen zal ik als private markeren zodat je ze wel ziet maar niet worden opgenomen in routeringen. . 
Groeten,
Jan-Peter
eggie (2020-09-26 15:19:08+00:00): Dag BrugN..
Je vraagt om een review.. Lijkt me oke.
Normaal gesproken hoort er een gebouwtje bij. Je kunt dat laten importeren via het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import, want het staat in de BAG. 
het adres komt dan ook mee. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Inlog identiek aan OSM account. Doe je het zelf?
MVG,
Eggie