piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SLMapper (2023-06-17 19:43:55+00:00): Hi, the allegedly "abandoned highways" around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357202609
are actually visible in 2017 aerial imagery
maraf24 (2015-06-29 22:44:25+00:00): Tylko operator się wyświetla dla bankomatów i tag ten powinien na nich pozostać bo jest prawidłowy.
"SA" i "sp.z.o.o." można usunąć. Przy okazji można też użyć prawidłowej nazwy banku - BZ WBK.
szydzio (2015-06-30 06:39:52+00:00): skorygowane według uwag
maraf24 (2015-06-29 22:37:47+00:00): A dlaczego access=no?
szydzio (2015-06-30 06:36:57+00:00): zarówno od zewnątrz jak i od środka holu kasowego nie ma obecnie dostepu do tego korytarza. Również na oficjalnym schemacie ten obszar zaznaczony jest jako odzielna sala/pomieszczenie bez możliwości przejścia.Zastanawiałem się w ogóle nad usunięciem tego korytarza,ale uznałem to za zbyt daleko idącą zmianę.Dlatego access=no,jeśli uważasz to za niewłaściwe zmień na access=private.Ale na pewno musi pozostać jakaś adnotacja, że ów korytarz jest obecnie zamkniety.
maraf24 (2015-07-03 21:12:06+00:00): Przyznaję, że jak tam byłem to tego nie zauważyłem.
Skoro jest niedostępny to jego usunięcie jest całkiem dobrym pomysłem. Warto by wtedy footway doprowadzić do czynnego wejścia zachodniego,
szydzio (2015-07-06 14:18:53+00:00): Zamknięty korytarz usunąłem zupełnie, dodatkowy footway do wyjścia zachodniego poprowadziłem
pnorman (2015-07-21 00:46:40+00:00): Hi, 
you've used Google as a source. Copyright and Google's terms don't let us take their data or use their products. (osm.org/copyright) Did you use Google as a source for any other changes?
Paul Norman 
For the Data Working Group
kammer (2015-07-21 08:39:19+00:00): Thank you for drawing this to my attention.

My source here is Google Street View, not Google Maps. As I understand it (at least in UK copyright law) I cannot take material belonging to Google and reuse it without their permission, but it's not a breach of copyright to view a publicly available image and draw my own conclusions from it. In this case I *may* have referred to a Google Street View image to remind myself of information that's available to anyone who walks down the street. To be honest I can't recall what it was that I looked at specifically, but whatever it was probably saved me the trouble of walking half a mile down the road to look for the information myself. I'm certain that anything I gleaned was in no way the intellectual property of Google.

Apologies if my interpretation of the situation is incorrect. If it is I could either remove the changes entirely or reconfirm them on foot and remove the reference to Google.

All the best,

Simon Marshall
pnorman (2015-09-19 03:36:14+00:00): Google Street View is covered by the Google Maps terms, and for this as well as other reasons they can't be used. I've gone ahead and "redacted" the data, which stops it from being viewable.
alexkmbk (2015-06-29 15:15:02+00:00): Родник в пос. Новая-Бухтарма
letihu (2017-12-20 10:30:37+00:00): Dieser Wegweiser
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3481702569/history
ist doppelt. Gleiches Level und gleiche Position.
Hier ist das Duplikat
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3625441293/history
SemYakimov (2015-07-17 16:07:17+00:00): Добрый день! Мне кажется, использование метки natural=peak для отметки высоты -  не самая лучшая идея.
malenki (2015-07-04 11:17:54+00:00): Könntet ihr zwei (Omegatherion, Miple) euch mal einigen, ob es hier einen Straßennamen gibt oder nicht? Sehr gern mit Quellenangaben!
Edit-Wars sind ein Unding.

Beispiel:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24845080/history

Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32170105
maraf24 (2015-07-02 21:24:46+00:00): "tyn"?
ViriatoLusitano (2015-06-30 11:40:01+00:00): Olá gudboy, obrigado pela contribuição! É sempre bom ter mais um utilizador a ajudar.

Reparei que editas-te em Ruivães, és por acaso da zona? Eu habito em Vila Nova de Famalicão e o Mazezito em Pedome.

Caso tenhas alguma dúvida manda uma mensagem!
GerdP (2015-11-17 20:00:31+00:00): Hi, please help me to understand:
What does oneway=both mean?
Is it just a typo?
way 171791378,way 357227776
sep (2015-11-17 20:15:00+00:00): fixed; something wrong happen...
Thanks.
GerdP (2015-11-17 20:18:23+00:00): okay, thanks for the feedback
d1g (2015-06-29 17:52:18+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=511397#p511397
maraf24 (2015-07-02 21:25:09+00:00): tynq?
maraf24 (2015-07-02 21:25:49+00:00): ono?
maraf24 (2015-07-08 17:19:53+00:00): Przy usuwaniu danych komentarz jest niezbędny.
gecho111 (2015-07-01 15:52:12+00:00): Highway 11 north of Pasqua doesn't meet the criteria of a motorway.  Motorways are controlled access highways, where as highway 11 has numerous level crossings.
Himké (2015-07-02 04:51:57+00:00): @gecho111: That seems to apply from only north of SK-734
gecho111 (2015-07-02 14:14:01+00:00): Level access near the seed plant.  I could see the west bypass project removing that in a few yeas.
JeSe-MX (2015-07-06 01:32:48+00:00): ¿Qué es "Cuauchichinola"?
¿poblado?, ¿ciudad?
eggie (2018-07-13 10:29:17+00:00): Na drie jaar weer aan het mappen, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
maraf24 (2015-07-02 21:26:33+00:00): branoc to jakiś rebus?
mhenson (2015-06-30 13:30:42+00:00): good catch, thank you!
Harald Hartmann (2015-06-30 08:46:11+00:00): Wow, ich bin begeistert ... sicher das ändern/hinzufügen nicht noch mehr spass macht als löschen? ;-)
5m4u9 (2015-07-04 23:44:18+00:00): acá tu error es el tipo de comida... únicamente usar cuisine=regional
ad47 (2015-06-30 19:40:00+00:00): Снимок уже устарел - недавно там был, моста не видел, дорожки проходят по-другому и их стало больше.
BushmanK (2015-06-30 22:58:07+00:00): Снимок вроде полуторалетней давности всего... Блин.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-22 09:06:36+00:00): Hello,
This change appears to have removed a number of names for South Carolina in languages other than English.  Was that deliberate?  Just checking...
Best Regards,
Andy
Nugjii (2015-06-30 00:51:14+00:00): https://www.google.mn/maps/@47.9008091,106.9033933,276m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en
flohoff (2015-06-30 07:20:40+00:00): Hi,
ich habe hier den changeset gesehen in dem du teile der Firmeninfos vom Hauptgebäude auf den Landuse übertragen hast. Ich halte das für falsch. Das ist ein LANDUSE - also das diese fläche Industriell genutzt wird. Normalerweise sind da keine weiteren infos drauf. Auch das diese Industriefläche 1913 entstanden ist - Die ist ja nicht in dieser ausdehnung 1913 entstanden also stimmt das ja so faktisch auch nicht.

Flo
flohoff (2015-06-30 07:23:11+00:00): Ach ja - Und dann habe ich noch addr:city tags auf amenity areas gefunden. Das halte ich auch für quatsch. Entweder vollständige adresse oder nichts. Aber nicht so halbgare Adressinformationen die im zweifelsfalle nur wieder in allen möglichen validatoren hochkommen weil die Adresse unvollständig ist. und ein addr.city=Harsewinkel auf einem amenity=parking ist aehm - unnötig?

Das ist ein POI und nur die Position ist für die Navigation entscheidend.

Flo
alexkmbk (2015-06-30 02:57:27+00:00): Родники у села Ленинка
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-30 14:59:34+00:00): To jest "Diabla Góra" - bez dopisku "gajówka"
http://kruklanki.e-mapa.net?x=698653&y=699767&zoom=14&group=2,3,24,5&service=3,4,5,21,22,25,27,10,11,28,29,30,31,32,33,35,36,37,38,49&alllayers=4,5,21,22,25,27,7,9,10,28,29,30,31,32,34,35,36,37,38,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,52,53,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63&layer=3,33001
Noah Whiteis (2015-06-30 06:51:48+00:00): This is not county road 101, it is technically trunk highway 801B, and a signed extension of MN 101. Originally before the 169/18/101 interchange and 169 shakopee bypass MN 101 was extended to 18/13 and the interchange was offically signed as MN 101. Later when the shakopee bypass/bloomington ferry bridge was built highway 101 east of shakopee was returned as CSAH 101 (county state aid highway) but the interchange road was kept in state ownership as trunk route 801B/101-205 or MN-101
user_6110846 (2018-03-13 11:15:31+00:00): Улица Днепровская использовать 2 покрытия нельзя
Антон-1983 (2018-03-18 17:56:22+00:00): Я исправил.
Но:
1 Нашли бы того, кто такой тег назначил!!! А не ко мне обращались.
2 Сами бы исправили!!! А не ко мне обращались.
joost schouppe (2015-07-01 18:43:17+00:00): Hoi Peter, wat voor een autowinkel is het precies? Hoe beter de tag, hoe gemakkelijker vindbaar de winkel.
gileri (2015-07-02 05:41:37+00:00): Bonjour, pourquoi fusionnez-vous les arrêts de bus entre-eux ?

À ma connaissance il y a bien 2 arrêts séparés à chaque arrêts que vous fusionnez, qui peuvent avoir des différences en plus comme la présence d'un abri ou un banc.
gileri (2015-08-19 17:25:14+00:00): N'ayant pas eu de réponse j'ai corrigé dans le changeset 33445270
luiswoo (2015-06-30 13:30:13+00:00): addr:steet -- только для наименования улицы: "улица Мясникова"
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU:Key:addr&uselang=ru
office=telecommunication - офис телеко-ной компании
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:office
luiswoo (2015-06-30 13:38:29+00:00): тем более, что в ID прекрасно находятся шаблон офисы через контекстный поиск, нужно только добавить тип - telecommunication в данном случае.
Zverik (2015-06-30 09:28:25+00:00): Откатил по просьбе Freem: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=513059#p513059
maning (2015-06-30 09:09:35+00:00): Hi, I think Sumulong Highway should remain as trunk and not tertiary since this the main road connecting many eastern towns of Rizal to Metro Manila via Marcos Highway.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-30 13:51:20+00:00): Hello - has http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108703520/history really become so narrow that you can't get a 4-wheel vehicle up it?  It used to be a farm access.  It's designated as a public bridleway, but didn't use to be a "highway=bridleway" - it was wider than that.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-30 13:52:41+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108703521/history is another one that was also a track.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-13 12:44:36+00:00): Also, you've changed http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114913956/history from footway to bridleway but left the designation at "public_footpath".  Whilst this combination isn't that uncommon, in the light of the other changes in here I do wonder if it is also in error.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-13 12:40:41+00:00): I definitely remember http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342047927/history as being wide enough for four-wheeled traffic.  Are you sure that that is now no longer the case?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-17 08:33:00+00:00): Zaznaczanie budynków jako punkt nie ma większego sensu - powinien być wyrysowany obrys geometryczny.
Druga sprawa - to czy do jest jednorodzinny nie definiujemy w nazwie, a w wartości tagu building. Na przykład dom jednorodzinny to building=house a wielorodzinny (tzw. blok) to building=apartments
Pozdrawiam
VictorIE (2018-12-04 23:15:40+00:00): Hi, Some untagged nodes here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3626823713 - they approximate the boundary line. Can they be deleted?
VictorIE (2018-12-04 23:16:40+00:00): Similar cluster here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3626823708#map=17/52.56603/-9.35515
SK53 (2018-12-04 23:24:04+00:00): Cant see any reason to keep them; or even how they got created in the first place.
VictorIE (2018-12-05 11:12:47+00:00): "or even how they got created in the first place" - I know that feeling. :)

I think they're all deleted now.
SK53 (2017-02-05 12:43:25+00:00): Adding munro=no, marilyn=no etc. to anything mapped as a peak is rather pointless & just clutters up the database, and is very confusing to people not familiar with any particular class of hills. If you must also add prominence which is more generally useful (for instance for excluding the spot heights which some people insist in adding from OOC OSGB maps).
duncaninnes (2017-02-10 11:27:37+00:00): I suppose this depends on your perspective.  I had started improving the data on all the Munros, then moved on to Marilyns. Then decided to expand to mark all Corbetts and Grahams etc.  At the start of this work it became clear that putting in munro=no was a good way of a) marking a peak out as not a munro and b) marking a peak out as one that I had inspected/edited etc.
Apologies if this isn't consistent with other tagging work in the database.  It wasn't meant to confuse, but rather the opposite.  Although I can see why other users might be confused by the tags.
I got a fair bit through this tagging, but ended up losing out to family time.
SK53 (2017-02-10 12:29:10+00:00): For workflow or temporary tagging I would recommend using something like your username as a prefix thus username:munro=no. Such a scheme can also be used for something intended to be more permanent, but for which a unified tagging scheme is not present. Using a common prefix makes it much easier to find all the tags and manage them separately (e.g., removing them after the task has been completed). They also provide a hint to other users that they are not expected to be used for general consumption.
stephan75 (2015-07-02 15:37:35+00:00): Hallo Sieda,
gibt es einen genaueren Grund, warum du hier in Hohnstorf die Tankstelle ein zweites Mal eingetragen hast?

Und bei deiner neuen Tankstelle und der Wasschstraße dort hast du addr: Daten hinzugefügt, aber OHNE addr:housenumber ... dabei ist die korrekte Hausnummer bereits an der ursprünglichen Tankstelle enthalten, oder nicht?

Gruß, Stephan
stephan75 (2015-07-05 18:16:16+00:00): Sieda, magst du dazu nochmal was sagen?

Falls nicht, muss ich leider über eine Revertierung deiner Elemente nachdenken.
Stephan
SK53 (2015-09-13 09:23:24+00:00): You added a major power line across the middle of Stockport in this edit. I saw no evidence of it on the ground. Is it underground? What are the sources you used to identify this?
SomeoneElse (2015-11-15 14:21:31+00:00): @SK53 I've added a note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/468953 , but it might be worth just removing this.  I don't remember it.
tyr_asd (2015-07-01 06:06:10+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OSM.

In this changeset, you apparently converted the whole forest into a car park. I guess that wasn't your intention, was it? I have fixed the issue it in the meantime.

--

Hallo! Willkommen bei OSM! In diesem Änderungssatz hast du anscheinend aus Versehen ein großes Waldgebiet in einen Autoparkplatz umgewandelt. Ich habe den Fehler inzwischen behoben.
HerrWeisse (2015-07-03 10:26:15+00:00): Hi.
I did it in purpose. I live nearby and this is a car park indeed. It appear as a large space half tarmac and gravel.
tyr_asd (2015-07-03 11:23:42+00:00): Hm. I think not. What I wanted to tell is that you had converted the whole forest (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/155451) into a car park the size of many km². That's simply impossible. :-D

I do not doubt that there is a missing car park somewhere, but if you would like to add it, you have to draw a new area for it using the appropriate area-drawing-tool in the OSM editor.
HerrWeisse (2015-07-03 21:58:00+00:00): Gosh, I saw the mistake right now and yes, you are right! I thought you was talking about a small area into it. Congratulations for your accuracy, where could you see this kind of updates?
tyr_asd (2015-07-04 18:01:27+00:00): I saw it more or less by chance as large parts of the map went yellow all of a sudden. But there is a nice tool called "whodidit" that lets one monitor a specific area quite easily: http://zverik.osm.rambler.ru/whodidit/
HerrWeisse (2015-07-05 09:31:43+00:00): Good to know. Thank you.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-28 19:13:48+00:00): Hi, can you think of any reason why http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357471821 shouldn't be man_made=reservoir_covered?
Yorvik Prestigitator (2015-12-28 21:07:10+00:00): No, I think your word order is probably the correct one.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-28 21:08:15+00:00): Thanks for fixing (never understood why it was that order to be honest).
andygol (2016-05-04 17:41:07+00:00): Доброго дня, Сергію!

Додавати вид дерев у name - погана ідея. Для цього більше підходить `genus=` (або `species=` більш точний підвид) - більш докладно у вікі - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Tag:natural%3Dtree
Сергій Дубик (2016-05-04 21:44:12+00:00): Привіт Андрію!
Так і додавав (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3502076700). Знаю, що краще лише власні назви. Просто дерева красиві і привертають увагу пішоходів — додавав як виключення, принаймні на якийсь час, щоб привернути увагу.
Hjart (2015-07-20 06:12:55+00:00): Husk at den skal "klikkes" på vejen
MarkusHD (2016-11-19 14:56:20+00:00): What was the source for these changes? Particularly for the translations of names to a German version.
beweta (2016-11-19 18:33:36+00:00): * http://gov.genealogy.net
* Wikipedia
MarkusHD (2016-11-20 16:44:39+00:00): The first POI I noticed was La Porte de Pierre:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3157450830
Added name:de="Türgestell" in this changeset.

In https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porte_de_pierre this German word is mentioned to be used in Alsace, so I don't think using it in name:de is the correct thing to do. It sounds very strange and confusing anyway and I haven't seen it on any sign on my trekking tour.
beweta (2016-11-20 17:46:26+00:00): "Türgestell" seems to be an Alsatian name (name:gsw).
MarkusHD (2016-11-20 19:04:34+00:00): Thanks for fixing/improving! But you used name:als instead!?
beweta (2016-11-20 19:27:39+00:00): name:als seems to be more common in Alsace and is specific for Alsatian.

The abbreviation gsw is also used for Alemannic and Swiss German.
See: http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/documentation.asp?id=gsw
MarkusHD (2016-11-20 19:36:37+00:00): According to Wikipedia "als" is the code for another language dialect:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tosk_Albanian

Besides taking data from Wikipedia has some license issues AFAIK.
Kevin Drieschner (2015-06-30 13:48:39+00:00): Sportgelände um einen Kunstrasenplatz erweitert
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-11 13:49:40+00:00): see http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1202750
maraf24 (2015-06-30 22:16:13+00:00): Zamknięcie dla ruchu pojazdów (znak B-1) to będzie vehicle=no a nie access=no.
Tutaj korzystać z drogi mogą mieszkańcy, dlatego najlepiej pasuje vehicle=destination. Można też dodać bus=yes, gdyż komunikacja miejska kursuje.
Olga | Yanosik (2015-07-01 06:56:13+00:00): Dziękuję za sugestie i szczegóły zamknięcia tego odcinka drogi - uwzględniłam.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-02 09:10:40+00:00): (email test)
Сергій Дубик (2015-07-01 22:53:06+00:00): Я змінив тег лінії на proposed:highway=cycleway (оскільки ще не збудована велодоріжка). Її видно тут https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/uk-ua/map/map_30509#13/49.5450/25.5619 або так https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357491067. Додав ще такі пропозиції по Топільче й Шевченка.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-30 22:33:16+00:00): Do adresów dobrze jest także dodać miejscowość.
Pozdrawiam
JeSe-MX (2015-07-06 01:38:28+00:00): Se ha duplicado el nodo con numero 23.
Será mejor agregar éstos valores al noto ya existente con anterioridad.

¿Qué es "Sistemas3"?
maraf24 (2015-07-02 21:31:26+00:00): "Dom jednorodzinny" to nie jest nazwa, ale opis. Na opis jest osobne pole.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-05 13:02:47+00:00): Co to za koślawe gówno wyrysowane na innym budynku?
maraf24 (2015-07-02 21:42:40+00:00): Sugerowałbym wypełnianie pola komentarza, pozwala on uniknąć nieporozumień co do intencji autora edycji.
Derick Rethans (2015-06-30 15:41:23+00:00): Thanks for adding these names!

You've only added the name tag though on two of them. Perhaps you should add place=neighbourhood (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood), or alternatively draw the area and put the name on there.

You also seem to have changed Silvertown to Royal Wharf - but perhaps that's what it should be?

Again, thanks for getting involved, and let me know if you have any questions.
maraf24 (2015-07-02 21:39:50+00:00): Edytor, po naciśnięciu S, prostuje kąty w budynkach. A z prostymi kątami są bliższe rzeczywistości.
froppi7 (2018-09-20 14:23:44+00:00): <EN> <09/2018> the source from Geovelo (ON3V 2015) now shows the V92 in 2018 only on the "La Flow Velo" Track.
Therefore is suggest the take this relation and all the other old V92 relations out of the V92 network (supper relation) in OSM.

Note: the source ON3V maybe not always correct. I found there an continuation form Thivies (end of La Flow Velo) to Cognac sur l'Isle, without any information available in the internet  (google etc.)
maraf24 (2015-07-02 21:27:58+00:00): Bardzo krzywe ramki.
AkuAnakTimur (2015-06-30 16:49:23+00:00): Yala, actually. Bad geography knowledge. Uh-oh.
Skippern (2015-07-04 20:02:26+00:00): Bom dia menelli84

Eu ver que voce tentei editar algum informação mas infelizmente não fiz certo. Ja corrige,mas vou explicar para voce entender, e espero que voce continuando contribuir.
O heliponto ja existi, 4 metros fora do posição, mas com nome em Inglês, o certa serie corrigir o nome e move o heliponto ate posição certo. O prefeitura ja existi com mesmos dados, e não precisava ser inserido de novo
O forum e identificado pelo tag amenity=courthouse
O ministerio publico e identificado pelo office=government

Boa mapeamento e bem vindo ao nosso comunidade
Peter Dobratz (2015-07-21 04:30:06+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.  You may not realize, but your edits have been made to the main database.  It looks like these points don't correspond to objects in the real world.  Should I undo these changes?
oregonbetti (2015-07-21 04:41:10+00:00): Yes please. Those traces somehow made it into there on mistake. Sorry about that (a bit new to this whole system and still trying to figure things out).
Peter Dobratz (2015-07-21 05:38:08+00:00): No problem, I've reverted this changeset in chageset 32768270 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32768270
Let me know if you have any questions about editing the map around Portland.
zors1843 (2015-07-01 05:13:02+00:00): Why do you use a multipolygon relation ?
ignatus1 (2015-07-01 05:25:36+00:00): i don't know i'm a novice i just would to create a relation, but i've no really good reason for create a polygon. In facts i think i don't really understand the use of polygon. Is it just for building or area, zone??
SomeoneElse (2019-02-05 16:50:19+00:00): Hello,
Currently the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/176705194 is tagged as a bed and breakfast.  I'm guessing that this should be on one of the houses instead?
Best Regards,
Andy
Bernd_BDP (2019-02-05 18:39:56+00:00): Thanks for this hint. Obviously you are right. I removed the wrong tags, the B&B Doonshean View is already tagged. :-)
Maybe i pushed a wrong button when editing 3 years ago.
SomeoneElse (2019-02-05 19:03:41+00:00): No problem - thanks for fixing!
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-30 22:34:14+00:00): Do adresów dobrze jest także dodać miejscowości i ulicę.
Pozdrawiam
SomeoneElse (2015-06-30 20:54:53+00:00): The other bit of this changeset was nudging the nodes near the Coach and Horses roundabout to better match traces and imagery.
edvac (2015-08-01 01:40:27+00:00): Hola:

El usuario Carlos Tapia se ha quejado en la lista talk-es@openstreetmap.org de que en esta edición eliminaste los edificios que había editado él y en el que había invertido mucho tiempo. Son los de esta manzana: http://osm.org/go/b_NoBuOi4--?layers=H&m=
Hacer una eliminación de este tipo es mala praxis, y deberías evitarla en el futuro. Lo es por las siguientes razones:
1) Borrar objetos debe evitarse siempre en la medida de los posible,
pues perdemos su historial. Esto aplica a todo: nodos, vias y relaciones. Siempre que se pueda, debe modificarse lo que ya hay.
2) Una edición de este calibre deberías haberla consultado con Carlos Tapia antes de llevarla a cabo.
3) Además, esta edición empeoró el mapa en lo que a los edificios se refiere, incumpliendo una máxima de OSM que es la de que nunca haremos ninguna edición que empeore el mapa, sinó que lo mejore.
Supongo que Carlos Tapia se pondrá en contacto contigo en breve. La solución más probable será revertir este conjunto de cambios para recuperar los edificios tal como estaban previamente.
Un saludo cordial.