piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tars4815 (2021-04-02 15:41:30+00:00): Hello Marianna, thanks for your valuable contribution to the project: your mapping is overall good and well detailed! Next time, please avoid moving nodes of highways. I know that in this area many streets are positioned in a wrong way if compared with Bing imagery but, due to the fact that road data have been imported in OSM by local users, it is better to leave streets in that way. For this reason the project was only dedicated to the mapping of point features.
Thanks again and keep working :)
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101809296
tars4815 (2021-04-02 15:43:02+00:00): Well done! Thanks for your contribution to this project in Bogotà! :)
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101809308
ChiaraPonti (2021-04-01 21:31:47+00:00): The position should be more precise, thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101809321
tars4815 (2021-04-07 14:29:12+00:00): Thanks Gabriela for your time and well-detailed mapping in this area! Next time, please avoid editing highways. I know that some of them are not correctly aligned with the imagery background of the task but it would be better not to modify them because they were added through import by local users, for this reason we did not included them on the project. Thanks again and happy mapping :)
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101809635
ChiaraPonti (2021-04-01 21:51:30+00:00): Tag the type of shop/amenity only if you are sure. Don't map features on the street when they are inside buildings! Thanks
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101809709
Łukasz Stilon (2021-03-29 21:42:47+00:00): Dom istnieje od 2020r. Bez numeru.
Adam_Piszczek (2021-03-30 08:38:03+00:00): Ok dodałem ponownie.
tars4815 (2021-04-02 16:19:23+00:00): Thanks for your valuable contribution!
Please, avoid editing highways in this area. The project requested to map only point features because the road network in this area was previously imported by local OSMers. So, even if some roads may not correspond to the Bing imagery, leave them as already mapped. Thanks again and keep working :)
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101810389
tars4815 (2021-04-03 22:18:43+00:00): Thanks for your valuable contribution. Please, avoid mapping or editing features not included on the goals of the project and stay focused on point features. Thanks again and keep working!
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101810620
tars4815 (2021-04-02 16:44:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution! Please next time be careful about the streetside on which the shop is located. You could evaluate it by looking at the single picture in which it is depicted and comparing it to the entire sequence and context. Thanks again and keep working :)
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101810747
Allison P (2021-03-26 18:25:58+00:00): Seven ones in a changeset, wow!
ChiaraPonti (2021-04-02 17:33:37+00:00): The dog in the sign could be misleading, but if you take a closer look you will notice that they sell sugar, coffee, salt, lentils, etc.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101811309
Alex Willmer (2021-04-19 23:59:59+00:00): This moved most the Burchfield Generation Planet tags from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/843940770 (est of Reading to Basingstoke rail line) to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/843940771 (west of the line, 200m south. This is probably mostly correct. However I was the one that took the WikiMedia photo, and I definitely took it at the former, not the latter. I'll get a photo of the latter next time I take a walk in that area.
Russ (2021-04-20 08:46:10+00:00): Hi Alex,

Oh, I missed the photo! This location is definitely "Burghfield Generation Plant" - it matches the image (google maps screenshot) on SSE's website:

https://www.ssethermal.com/flexible-generation/operational/burghfield/

From the sign in your photo it looks like the location to the northeast is Burghfield Landfill Site. That one is likely burning methane from the landfill.

I moved your photo back to the other object but it might be worth getting it renamed on Wikimedia Commons.
tars4815 (2021-04-07 15:15:37+00:00): Thanks Ahmad for your time and contribution! Next time, please be careful about the streetside to map on. You can orientate through the pictures making comparisons within the photo sequence itself and also with the help of OpentTopoMap when uphill/downhill are depicted in the picture.
Happy mapping :)
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101811496
BCNorwich (2021-03-26 20:09:39+00:00): Hello, I've removed the fictional motorway you added to OpenStreetMap. I'm sure you didn't intend to deliberately corrupt the OSM database. Could you therefore please try not to upload unverifiable features. Thanks!

Regards Bernard.
Edelsalami (2022-03-27 21:44:00+00:00): Hi, I'm pretty sure that this supposed military area is just a cattle farm: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/922702019#map=17/39.37622/75.74067 And the socalled radome is just some feed silo.
scdhin (2022-03-28 15:42:26+00:00): Hi, you are right, the dome was not clear. the imagery do not show it anymore. how is a cattle farm tagged?
Edelsalami (2022-03-28 16:08:50+00:00): Seems you already did a good job. Thanks!
BCNorwich (2021-03-26 20:18:25+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Adding objects to OSM with only a name tag is actually meaningless to the OSM database. These objects are not recognised and will not be rendered on a map.

Please take a little time to read and understand how to map, this is easily done via the help button above right.

If you are not able to correct the mistakes in all your changesets I'll try to make corrections later.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-03-26 20:21:27+00:00): The above relates to features with only lane tags as well.
SHARCRASH (2022-02-10 17:41:17+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your contributions but I'd like you to realise that on certain changes you've been misleading people up to where they can access features like these examples i left in purpose to show you:
- this way is not entirely under construction https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/922704686 & this noexit is wrong https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8565584822 Users can still go N up to near the end of the tennis courts.

- another noexit wrong https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8565584821 whereas again users can actually go further to S up to here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7280496719 

Also for FYI, the difference between note=... and description=... is that note is rather directed only to map contributors, whereas description is rather for all users, non mappers included (if the third part map renderer service shows such information). So it would have been better to add your message in description.

I'm wondering if there are other places where you've added such restrictions...

Can you please reply so that i know when you've seen my comment here and then i will correct. Thanks!
Lxfly (2022-02-10 18:28:33+00:00): Ok, thanks for your comment.
you are right, but even you may use it partly, for me the bicycle path is interrupted and closed on the marked points. thanks
SHARCRASH (2022-02-10 20:22:27+00:00): I am cyclist too but there are other type of users that still must access those ways for different features: farmers, users from the tennis court, workers of the construction... I've corrected the end near the sports center. Is there any barrier here or is it just a board informing the closure and deviation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8565584821 ?
kasmar00 (2021-03-26 19:13:30+00:00): Prze przypadek poszły dwa zestawy zmian do jednego. W pierwszej części była aktualizacja obszaru szpitala pulmonologicznego.
eggie (2021-03-26 21:13:05+00:00): Merged info with BAG addressnode.
Gr eggie
czubi (2021-03-27 11:30:20+00:00): Moin Martin, wenn du die Addr. lieber am Gelände hast musst du sie vom Gebäude runternehmen, oder umgekehrt. Sonst ist sie doppelt!
aixbrick (2021-03-26 21:29:20+00:00): Hallo,
diese zusätzlichen cycleway-Tags ergeben bei einem reinen Rad-/Gehweg keinen Sinn. Es sieht nun so aus, als wenn der Rad-/Gehweg nochmal einen Radweg hat.
Gruß
Lodda (2021-03-27 16:57:25+00:00): Habe die Einträge zurückgenommen.
Danke.
aixbrick (2021-03-27 20:42:47+00:00): Danke
tars4815 (2021-04-02 16:10:11+00:00): Thanks for your valuable contribution to our project in Bogotà! Next time, please be careful about the correct streetside depicted in the images. Always check twice comparing the single image with the entire Mapillary sequence.
Thanks again and keep working :)
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101813266
Velikodsky (2021-03-26 23:53:18+00:00): На тротуарах вже було surface=paving_stones. Тег footway:surface не потрібен
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101813314
Sergey82K (2021-03-27 06:37:57+00:00): Там у велодоріжки асфальт і у тротуара плитка. Тому StreetComplete уточнює, що плитка саме у тротуарної частини.
Velikodsky (2021-03-27 17:21:48+00:00): ну добре, тоді тег surface не потрібен?
Sergey82K (2021-03-28 12:55:50+00:00): Мабуть так. Це додаток сам теги ставить, в ньому не видно існуючі теги. Потрібно буде звернутись до розробників додатка.
user_5359 (2021-03-27 04:45:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. 

In the Bing aerial photo, the visible buildings overlap with the property boundaries.

May I ask for the licence of the used source?
Adventurerunner (2021-03-27 19:54:47+00:00): My mother works at the park there and she needed a map of the "lots" non government divided parcels. This was simply the easiest platform to create the data set off of. I couldnt change the color of the land features from something other then the yellow otherwise I would have just marked the land. Between the different image sets it doesnt line up perfectly, not sure if it is a georeferencing issue on the main data end.  

Not entirely sure what you mean by the licence of the used source. It was me and her just looking at the map and comparing it to a 1960 hand drawn map.
Jeff Underwood (2021-04-05 18:39:59+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for contributing to OSM. Unfortunately, I have reverted the change to the Mexicali admin feature. Please do not repurpose existing data for totally different features like that. Instead make a new feature if you wish to add a shop.

Please feel free to reach out if you need assistance. 

-Jeff
superrache (2021-03-29 10:07:39+00:00): thanks for this level of detail
Komadinovic Vanja (2021-03-29 18:17:56+00:00): Hi,

I saw you removed wikidata tag from this peak and added wikipedia article. It seems wikipedia article doesn't exist. Was this mistake?
eggie (2021-03-26 21:05:29+00:00): Viaducten en tunnels.. Het is altijd een keuze.. of een viaduct.. maar dan geen tunnel tekenen.. of alleen een tunnel..maar dan geen kruisend viaduct.

Up to you. ...
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2021-03-26 21:08:26+00:00): .. Maar het is oke nu.. Het was nog de oude rendering die ik zag
gr eggie
BCNorwich (2021-03-28 17:13:49+00:00): Hi I've removed two ways that duplicated the single existing way.
BCNorwich (2021-03-28 17:16:01+00:00): Please be aware that Public Footpath FP183 is not the name. It's the council reference
BCNorwich (2021-03-28 17:19:39+00:00): Way: Tum Hill Circular Walk (922847370) was placed partly on top of a river and part over existing highways.
olo81 (2021-03-26 19:54:33+00:00): ostatnio dodawanie proponowanych dróg warto żeby zawierało źródła
C2oc4 (2021-03-26 21:17:07+00:00): już
olo81 (2021-03-26 21:33:24+00:00): bardziej chodzi o linki do projektów potwierdzające dany przebieg, ale to tak na przyszłość 
coraz więcej jest wandali którzy nanoszą takie drogi i trudno je potwierdzić
C2oc4 (2021-03-27 05:32:42+00:00): dobra będę pamiętać, nie tworzę tutaj rzeczy celem wandalizmu czy zrobienia na złość czasem fakt dam gafę czy coś ale to tylko niechcący lub z złego zinterpretowania czegoś :)
eggie (2021-03-26 21:11:44+00:00): Hi Krekev.
I merged the info with tha BAG addressnode
greetz,
eggie
tars4815 (2021-04-07 14:23:40+00:00): Well done, great mapping! Thanks for contributing to OSM, happy mapping :)
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101814232
tars4815 (2021-04-06 13:54:57+00:00): Well done, great mapping! Thanks for contributing to OSM, happy mapping :)
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101814332
tudacs (2021-03-29 15:20:49+00:00): Hallo 'mobilesdarmstadt',

du hast mit diesem Changeset den ersten Pfad, der die Dörrwiesenschneise schneidet auf 'track' gesetzt. Das ist mEn falsch, da der Pfad nicht für zweispurig Fahrzeuge geeignet ist. Was war der Grund für dieses Umtaggen?
mobilesdarmstadt (2021-03-30 09:28:10+00:00): Hallo tudacs,
ich wollte die Oberflächenart mit tracktype darstellen, deshalb habe ich track gewählt.
Dass track nur bei befahrbaren Wegen angewendet wird, war mir nicht bewusst.
tudacs (2021-03-30 11:37:47+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort! Bei 'path' kann man mit 'surface' und 'smoothness' die Eigenschaften angeben; sogar präziser als mit 'tracktype' (um dessen Werte es zudem immer mal wieder Diskussionen gibt :) ).

Ich habe jetzt zwei Wege wieder zu 'path' zurückgesetzt und 'surface' sowie 'smoothness' kontrolliert/ergänzt/angepasst.

Magst du kurz drüber schauen, ob das für dich so passt?
mobilesdarmstadt (2021-03-30 14:04:14+00:00): Klar, das passt. Beim nächsten Spaziergang vor Ort schau ich's mir mit dem neuen Wissen nochmal an.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-03-26 22:24:15+00:00): ediçao revertida, usuário retirou nome do bairro para escrever um nome genérico: "aeroporto". Por favor, tenha melhores praticas de mapeamento. dessa forma voce apagou dados do mapa.
adlid (2021-03-27 21:04:48+00:00): Hey,

The Bing imagery has a significant offset over london, meaning the default alignment of imagery when you open iD is incorrect. You can check against the Cadastral data layer, or use a rough offset of (4.1, -1.7), which can be set at the bottom of the Background pane on the right.

Note that iD forgets the offset when you reload the page, so needs to be reconfigured every time... :/

Thanks :)
ZenPhil (2021-03-28 12:27:16+00:00): Hi Adlid! Sorry about that, I'm new to mapping here and more used to areas with sparse data. I'll have to revisit this in a few days on my pc and use the method you mention, thanks for the info. Best, zendesk.
adlid (2021-03-28 14:47:44+00:00): No worries, it's awesome you're contributing! If my explanation is a bit vague, I'm happy to provide any more help :)
santamariense (2021-04-03 17:41:44+00:00): Olá lucasfpiaui,
.
Esta rodovia não pode ser motorway porque este tipo de ligação [1] a descaracteriza como tal.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/143658652
.
Adicional a isso, reforço o que disse no comentário desta outra changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96091225
.
[]'s
santamariense
lenny32 (2021-03-29 16:10:52+00:00): Bonjour,
Il me semble que ce n'est pas très visible sur https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SNrOYx35IzRnbtOLxz0JWw  en zoomant à droite au pied du support du trolley on aperçoit et on voit très bien en se rendant sur place qu'il ne devrait pas y avoir un noexit, mais relier au https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757884458, pour que le routage piéton puisse se faire.
Cordialement
bdoin (2021-03-29 17:55:22+00:00): Vous avez raison, je me suis confondu. C'est corrigé.
Ltrlg (2021-03-26 20:59:51+00:00): Oups, pas visible sur l’Ortho HR 2020. Fait à partir d’une visite sur place.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-10 11:21:20+00:00): Hello,
The relations that you have created here are not routes.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12492987 is a "type=site" relation (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site it a way of grouping various elements together, where a geometric relationship wouldn't work).
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12336335/history is a "no left turn" and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12336333/history is "only straight on".
As I said earlier in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99460659 , "As an example of how it should be done, you can look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5699311 (a route relation) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429291355 (a way that is part of that route). ".
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-04-10 12:33:58+00:00): I've added another answer to https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/79382/bicycle-park-mtb-city-road-help?page=1&focusedAnswerId=79594#79594 which should hopefully help.
Adam_Piszczek (2021-06-27 21:13:33+00:00): A gdzie tu jest punkt widokowy? i na co?bo nic tam takiego nie ma.
VA00 (2021-06-28 05:50:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8565844527
Adam_Piszczek (2021-06-28 08:18:01+00:00): Widok na stopień wodny?bo nic innego tam nie widać.
pan_borsuk (2021-06-28 12:08:09+00:00): chłopaki. z racji "ustawienia" Wisły widać wschód słońca w osi rzeki . tym bardziej że jest to w obszarze obniżonego horyzontu bramy krakowskiej więc słońce nie musi wspinać się wysoko nadeń.

w miejscu jest mały drewniany pomostek. polecam z rana. miejsce inne niż reszta brzegu
VA00 (2021-06-28 14:47:39+00:00): To wrysuj pomościk, ja nie wiem gdzie on jest ani nie widać go na zdj. sat. A Słońce wschodzi na wschodzie tylko 2x do roku...
pan_borsuk (2021-06-28 16:29:11+00:00): pomościk jest na prawo od betonowych płyt służących do sprowadzania łódek do wody z przyczep. Wyrysuje dziś.

a co to znaczy że "dwa razy do roku na wschodzie" ?  :-P pomijając chmurzyska to statystycznie winno 365,25 wschodzić :-D
VA00 (2021-06-28 20:03:40+00:00): https://astronomommy.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/sunset-position.png
M!dgard (2021-03-26 21:35:06+00:00): *letter boxes
mueschel (2021-03-27 10:56:05+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "red_turn:left:bicycle" - can bicycles really turn _left_ and not right?
Remove Before Flight (2021-03-27 11:03:32+00:00): Ooops. Corrected
tars4815 (2021-03-31 13:10:00+00:00): Thanks for your valuable contribution to the project! Next time, please be careful about the streetside depicted on the Mapillary photos. You can have an help for this by using OpenTopoMap (contour lines for elevation) as a background when you find pictures showing street going uphill or downhill. Thanks again and keep working :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101819473
Axelos (2021-03-27 07:45:42+00:00): On ne sera jamais d’accord sur le sujet, supprimer des données ce n’est pas de la correction mais du vandalisme !
Rom1 (2021-03-27 10:41:33+00:00): Salut Axel, tu parles de ce bâtiment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116581162 ? J'y ai supprimé les références car elles faisaient doublon avec les bâtiments voisins. Je voulais justement te signaler le problème mais tu m'as devancé.
Axelos (2021-03-30 17:45:22+00:00): Tu as de la chance c’est a priori une erreur de ma part, mais rassure-toi je t’aurais !
muchichka_s (2021-03-27 07:14:48+00:00): Привіт ще раз

Межі села Довге Поле вже нанесені за даними Закарпатської ОДА 2018-го року. Ви зробили дублікат села. Його необхідно видалити
Piotr Strębski (2024-08-20 15:46:35+00:00): Hej, co Ty na to, by poprawić plac manewrowy (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/922754817) według zasad z Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddriver_training)? Serdeczne, piotr
muchichka_s (2021-03-27 07:15:24+00:00): Привіт ще раз

Межі села Великі Геївці вже нанесені за даними Закарпатської ОДА 2018-го року. Ви зробили дублікат села. Його необхідно видалити

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/922755426
sorokendya (2021-03-27 15:58:26+00:00): Дякую за виправлення
VictorIE (2021-03-29 01:26:19+00:00): Hi,

When splitting up terraced houses / pairs of semi-Ds, be careful to delete duplicated buildings. :)
rs_mapping (2021-03-26 22:40:38+00:00): Ok, alles wie beabsichtigt. Die Änderungen an L267 & Buslinien folgen aus einem zusätzlichen Node um den Radweg auf der Bahnstraße richtig abzubilden
!bm (2021-03-26 22:59:47+00:00): Hallo osm_tbp,

die website=* war bereits als contact:website=* [1] erfasst – beide sind für sich genommen zulässig, aber doppelt ist unnötig/unerwünscht, daher habe ich deine Änderungen revertiert.

Bei vielen Tags kann man das leicht übersehen, im iD-Editor stehen die contact:*-Tags weiter unten, während die einfachen contact-Tags oben stehen und dann oft leer sind – also bitte genau hinsehen! Ein Vergleich, von einfachen vs contact:* siehe [2]

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact:website_/_website_/_url

--besteGrüße!bm
osm_lokjo (2021-03-26 23:14:34+00:00): Ah ok entschuldiging, ich würde mich nächste mal doppel checken, danke dir!
osm_lokjo (2021-03-26 23:24:18+00:00): Ui! Aber der neue website ist http://www.yoyofoodworld-berlin.de und nicht was es schon war http://www.yoyofoodworld.com (seht ähnlich aus, aber ist es nicht) Also bitte doch ändern. ;)
!bm (2021-03-26 23:29:38+00:00): Sehr gut, vielen Dank fürs Nachprüfen! (Bei der Menge an Oooos kann man schon mal ins Schlingern geraden.) Erledigt.
DUGA (2021-04-01 00:38:44+00:00): Please always use MD 6-inch first in MD.
jomox (2021-03-26 23:36:25+00:00): Hello, a ship is not a building. This has already been reverted my moderators in the past, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101782936

I've reverted this changeset as well, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101821610

Please don't tag for the renderer (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer).
JriSv250 (2021-12-22 21:22:47+00:00): The ship is no longer here.
MxxCon (2021-03-27 07:00:49+00:00): Hello.
Mapbox satellite imagery shows that this roof appears to be flat. Is gabled the correct tag here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101820863
barklund (2021-03-28 01:36:11+00:00): I was actually unsure. It is pitched in the middle, but only by maybe a meter compared to the edges, so not a large difference. However, I felt that gabled was the right tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101820863
Cristoffs (2021-03-28 19:46:18+00:00): Proszę opisuj swoje zmiany dokładniej. Jeśli zmieniłeś adres to opisz to.
adrigrillo (2021-03-26 23:04:02+00:00): Estoy en el proceso de revisión de las líneas de bus, pero las rutas están obsoletas.
nevw (2021-03-27 02:03:58+00:00): Hi
I have reverted your edit that added a natural wetland to the Canberra City Centre and added a propriety Google/Shutterstock image link.
ZeLonewolf (2021-04-04 02:44:22+00:00): Hey, so this change actually broke the Menomonie / Town of Menomonie boundary polygon.  (See missing piece of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/251653)

Unfortunately, iD doesn't give any warning to mappers when this happens (see bug report https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8286)

Also, just wanted to throw out an invitation to the OpenStreetMap US Slack!  Link is
https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ and there are channels #local-wisconsin and #local-us-midwest .  Hope to see you there!
MidwestMapGeek (2021-04-05 23:05:39+00:00): Thanks for the note- I have no idea how that happened.