piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Akkurator (2021-09-20 21:57:32+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,
du hast access=private gesetzt.
Das kommt mir seltsam vor, weil es die einzige Zufahrt zu mindestens 8 Gebäuden ist.
Wie ist da die Beschilderung?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dprivate schreibt:

"Für gewöhnlich werden damit private Auf- und Zufahrten sowie Wege, die lediglich zu einem privaten Wohngebäude führen markiert.

Eine Beschilderung "Privatweg" ist hier nicht gleichzusetzen. Diese zeigt lediglich eine geänderte Straßenunterhaltungspflicht an, jedoch kein allgemeines Betretungsverbot. Ein "Betreten verboten" bzw. eine "Befahren verboten" wäre hier entsprechend als access=private umzusetzen. Ein "Durchfahrt verboten" entspricht jedoch eher einem access=destination."

Fragende Grüße,
Akkurator
ChrisFromRV (2021-09-20 22:28:41+00:00): Ich bin mir nicht mehr sicher, es war auf jeden Fall das runde Schild, mit rotem Rand und weißer Mitte. Die Straße ist halt nur für Anwohner, der Allgemeinverkehr darf hier nicht durchfahren.
Akkurator (2021-09-21 15:48:27+00:00): Habe heute morgen einen Blick drauf geworfen: in der Tat, es ist Schild 250 mit Zusatz "Anwohner frei".
Also das hier:
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=250,1020-30
Korrigierst du bitte entsprechend?
Akkurator (2021-09-22 21:34:25+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur, schon fast richtig.
access=private gehört auch noch weg. Hab's korrigiert.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111563210
Akkurator (2021-09-20 22:01:42+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,

du selbst hattest erst vor genau 1 Jahr den Namen von Eywiesen in Kuppelnau geändert, jetzt wieder zurück. Bleibt's nun dabei?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91113635

Verwunderte Grüße,
Akkurator
ChrisFromRV (2021-09-20 22:26:39+00:00): Sorry, aber ich mache die Straßenschilder nun mal nicht.
Akkurator (2021-09-21 08:40:17+00:00): Das Namenschild "Eywiesenstraße" am großen Lampenmast auf der Verkehrsinsel ist schon "immer" dort, bspw. auf mapillary-Foto von 2016 zu sehen.
Insofern darf man sich schon fragen, was dich vor 1 Jahr veranlasst hat, das in Kuppelnaustraße umzubenennen.
Hatte vielleicht ein Maischerzkeks die Schilder vertauscht? Google nennt das Straßenstück ja auch falsch Kuppelnaustraße. Honi soit qui mal y pense.
zstadler (2023-01-17 16:53:23+00:00): Helloo Sokuya,

Thank you for your continued contribution to OSM.

There is no need to create a relation for buildings. In fact, in most cases it is impossible to create a valid "multipolygon" relation for a building.

Please see 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
for description of mapping the different building parts, and 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings
for a more detailed description of 3D descriptions for buildings.

Best regards,
Zeev
gabro00 (2021-09-24 10:19:29+00:00): Szia!
Ezzel a módosítással Orci nevű település nagy részét kitörölted. Legközelebb körültekintően szerkessz!
A 111639591-as számú módosításcsomagban visszaállítottam az eredeti változatot.
user_11435438 (2021-08-26 02:43:05+00:00): Hi, you deleted the existing places (node/6049214249) again. Please pay attention to your edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110239988
CENTRALHUB (2021-08-26 07:15:56+00:00): This user's changes have deleted lots of "center" town places in Xinjiang.
NFZANMNIM (2021-08-26 17:05:27+00:00): yes, I have been in talks with Jyunhou about this for a few days. Jyunhou has been taking the time in partially reverting the changes in order to restor the deleted nodes. I was/am inexperienced in OpenStreetMap when it comes to subdivisions and cities/towns/villages in China and I was simplifying things based on how I've seen them done on OpenStreetMap in other countries.
CENTRALHUB (2021-08-26 17:26:08+00:00): If you are not familiar with the administrative hierarchy, you could find useful information in Wikipedia. The current mapping in Xinjiang is not perfect but most place features are correct. It's not easy to recover the nodes you have deleted.
Frans S (2021-08-27 09:14:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Map buildings individually. Do not collect buildings in 1 mapping., Square the rectangular buildings you map

Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110240877
eggie (2021-08-25 16:45:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. 

Je hebt een lege lijn ingetekend en de wegen op slot gezet voor iedereen met access=private

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Hungerburg (2021-08-29 21:51:24+00:00): So, how do people get to Roßkogelhütte? You made it unreachable…
mvoehringer (2021-08-30 19:49:23+00:00): Thank you for your feedback, but I don‘t see the problem. I just add an new path, why is the Rosskogelhütte unreachable now?
Hungerburg (2021-08-30 22:14:05+00:00): You are welcome. Ich seh, du taggst gern "access=no". Das macht hier aber keinen Sinn. Jetzt gibt es einen Weg dort, der geht sogar durch die Hütte, aber niemand darf den betreten? Ich kann mich nicht erinnern, dort je ein Schild der Art gesehen zu haben, bei einem Gasthaus wäre das schon sehr verwunderlich.
eggie (2021-08-25 16:48:17+00:00): Elk begin is moeilijk. Je hebt hier een weg op een weg geplakt.
Er is toch al een weg?
Daar kun je op bijtaggen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-25 16:55:15+00:00): Ale dubbele opgeplakte wegen verwijderd.
Het westelijke stuk Heikant heb ik ontdaan van access=private

Welke borden staan hier zodat publiek weet dat ze hier niet mogen lopen? art.461 wvs ?

MVG
eggie
bcdsj (2021-08-25 17:08:49+00:00): Hallo bedankt voor de hulp. Het is voor mij een wat ingewikkelde (eerste) wijziging:  -Het stuk heikant vanaf de viersprong Bospad/Duinrand is openbare weg. Die loopt dan rechtdoor als voetpad (waar ik de naam heb toegevoegd). -Rechtsaf (heikant 2,4,6,8) is privé. Hier staan borden: Eigen weg en doodlopende weg (ook voor fietsers en voetgangers).
Het laatste stuk (vanaf het lichtgroene veldje tot aan het bospad is terrein van de kampeervereniging. Hier is al minstens 30 jaar geen pad of weg. Het pad stopt na het lichtgroene veldje.
eggie (2021-08-25 17:16:10+00:00): Mooi...  
Dan klopt het dat ik dat stukje naar het wandelpad heb ontdaan van access=private. Ik heb dat stuk weg gesplitst nu. 
Lastig is het voor iedereen die begint. Het lijkt zo simpel, maar dat is het dus niet. 

Overigens is een bord Eigen Weg niet genoeg om een weg op access=private te zetten.
Dat kan alleen als het aangegeven is met een bord Verboden toegang art 462 wvs.
Juridisch ligt het ingewikkeld.
Een Eigen Weg geven we aan met access=permissive.
De eigenaar van het terrein kan je ten alle tijde de toegang ontzeggen.
Dus even overwegen .. wek deel is... 
access=private  (Verboden toegang staat aangegeven) of
access=permissive
(Eigen weg) 

Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2021-08-25 17:17:43+00:00): Wanneer het pad stopt na het groene veldje maak je daar een splits op een node. Rechts klikken en dan gaat er een menu open. Zal wel een schaartje zijn. Daarna verwijder je het wegdeel dat niet bestaat.
bcdsj (2021-08-25 17:38:03+00:00): ik geloof dat het nu allemaal aardig gelukt is.
eggie (2021-08-25 16:49:41+00:00): bcdsj.. Dit lijkt me oke.. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-25 16:50:46+00:00): Je kunt dan bij je commentaar zetten bij upload. Naam toegevoegd.

Mapse
eggie
Алексей Кирдяшов (2021-08-25 16:06:37+00:00): ...
Diacritic (2021-09-06 01:22:21+00:00): Hey Aayudhi!

I think you might have extended the toll tag a little too far on the West Gate Freeway.

The tollway starts on the east side of  Kings Way, (as Citylink), and then starts again northbound on at the Bolte Bridge turnoff. It's possible to turn left on Kings Way and continue to the WGB without paying a fee.

There is a real nest of different lanes on the freeway with off/on ramps, so I'm happy to help out fixing some parts if you'd like?
aayudhi-choudhary (2021-09-06 17:04:55+00:00): Yes please do that, I am sorry that I have messed it, I thought it was a part of CityLink.
maraf24 (2021-08-26 19:55:03+00:00): Droga na pole.
user_8120638 (2021-08-27 07:47:18+00:00): Tak ale droga z swoją numeracją kategorii publicznej
maraf24 (2021-08-28 18:32:02+00:00): Nieistotne.
user_8120638 (2021-08-29 07:39:46+00:00): Bardzo istotne bo jest w obrocie prawnym
maraf24 (2021-08-26 19:52:55+00:00): Droga nie istnieje.
maraf24 (2021-08-26 19:51:00+00:00): na pole
user_8120638 (2021-08-27 07:49:02+00:00): Tam już kolejny dom wyrasta zatem o co chodzi ?
maraf24 (2021-08-26 19:47:31+00:00): Tutaj nie ma drogi. Tutaj jest płot między działkami.
ted3sco (2021-08-25 18:09:31+00:00): Salut, am mai expus problema. Doar pentru ca are indicativ DJ, nu inseamna automat secondary. Ia in calcul si daca e ok pentru tranzit, suprafata si calitatea drumului. Mare parte din el, in zona asta, e un drum de pamant de foarte proasta calitate. Prin comparatie DC81 care e tertiary, cu pietris plus asfalt in Rovine, e mult mai bun pentru traficul local, si tranzit chiar daca nu e asfaltat complet.
Ajunge sa aiba indicativ de DN si-l facem primary ? Un GPS care tine cont de aceste taguri, ne-ar baga pe aceste drumuri de pamant. Asemenea portiunea dintre Simnicu de Sus si Urechesti, e un drum agricol de pamant cu indicativ de DJ641.
Claudiu10 (2021-08-25 18:19:27+00:00): Salut! Nu îl facem noi drum secundar el a fost clasificat astfel de Consiliul Județean sau Guvernul României. Așa apare și pe hărți oficiale ale României și ale județului Dolj. Drumul respectiv este drum județean.  Sa zicem calitatea este îndoielnică marcam asta prin smoothness, viteza recomandata și suprafață (mai poți pune care este limita de tonaj și limita de înălțime unde cunosti). În principal astea sunt folosite la rutare.
ted3sco (2021-08-25 18:53:57+00:00): Pe OSM noi (toti editorii) il facem asa, la fel cum am facut si marile bulevarde din orase secondary fiindca sunt recomandate traficului in interiorul orasului chiar daca au sau nu indicativ de DC, DJ,DN. Asa cum drumurile de rocadă au rang primary desi n-au indicativ de DN fiindca sunt recomandate circulatiei de tranzit. Nu este legat rangul unui drum din OSM de indicativul sau oficial dat printr-o HG/ HCJ. S-au clasificat ca DJ niste drumuri locale dintr-o comuna catre o manastire, doar pentru interesul de a se asfalta de catre CJ. Asta-l face automat secondary, desi nu leaga drumuri importante intre ele si e doar un drum catre o poarta  ? Ma duc la extrem... o carare lata de 1 metru pe deal/munte primeste indicativ de DJ, il facem automat secondary ?
Cred ca ar fi bune si parerile altor editori.
ted3sco (2021-08-25 18:14:08+00:00): Salut, am mai dat un comentariu pentru DJ641 din Craiova. 
Rangul drumului indiferent de indicativ trebuie sa tina cont de calitatea si suprafata drumului. Un GPS care tine cont de maxspeed si rang(secondary) te va ruta pe aici desi nici cu tractorul nu e confortabil.
rarad74 (2021-08-25 20:47:57+00:00): Nu mai ruidica te rog rangul drumurilor judetene neasfaltate!!!
Exact cum a spus si ted3sco, trebuie sa tina cont si de calitatea  si suprafata drumului. In tara avem prost clasificate din oficiu o gramada de drumuri judetene care sunt de fapt niste amarate de drumuri agricole de pamant. Nu ai vrea sa mergi cu masina personala pe acolo pentru ca pur si simplu nu poti.
Claudiu10 (2021-08-25 20:50:36+00:00): Nu contează ca nu sunt asfaltate. Exista alte atribute prin care sarati asta de exemplu suprafața. Surface
Claudiu10 (2021-08-25 20:51:14+00:00): Smothness e altul
Claudiu10 (2021-08-25 20:51:52+00:00): Pe toate hărțile ele apar secundare.
rarad74 (2021-08-26 04:17:43+00:00): Nu ne intereseaza ca pe alte harti ( PROASTE ) sunt secundare. DAca nu esti orb, poti vedea si pe imagini ca de abia se observa drumul prin camp - in asa hal de prost este. Daca Ministerul transporturilor le-a clasificat prost, nu inseamna ca o sa te duci cu masina sa iti lasi suspensiile pe acolo. Conteaza inclusiv reprezentarea grafica, nu doar tag-ul de surface.  Iar osm se bazeaza foarte mult si pe grafica. Este una dintre cele mai reprezentative harti -prin culoare.
wb_import (2021-08-25 18:26:58+00:00): Thanks for contributing! I've upgraded your entry to be as complete as I can make it, check out the changes here and welcome to OpenStreetMap! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110247201

If you're so inclined, you can further improve the map by creating an Area for your building, an Area for the parking lot with appropriate tags, and making sure that nearby roads are tagged right so customers can use the navigation function to drive to you easily.
mueschel (2021-09-02 11:14:42+00:00): Hi,
what do these tags mean? They are not used in any other place.

  minwidthcycle = 0
Maskulinum (2021-09-04 06:16:27+00:00): Hier müsstest du bei dem Ersteller von maxwidthcycle und widthcycle nachfragen. Ich hatte versucht das Tag zu vereinheitlichen und den Schreibfehler mit übernommen.
Eventuell sollte man es noch in mincyclewidth umändern?
=======
Here you would have to ask the creator of maxwidthcycle and widthcycle. I tried to standardize the tag and took over the spelling mistake.
Maybe you should change it to mincyclewidth?
mueschel (2021-09-04 07:32:29+00:00): There was a 'widthcycle=0' tag added 6 years ago by a user active for only a month. I don't think it helps to copy this tag to another spelling and keep it. It's neither defined anywhere nor does it make sense in any way.

Defined keys are cycleway:width or maxwidth:bicycle, but both should not be added without checking the situation on the ground.
eggie (2021-08-25 17:47:47+00:00): Lijkt me oke.
pitscheplatsch (2021-08-28 05:11:46+00:00): Hallo Vagor, willkommen bei OSM.

Und sollte der Test wieder rückgängig gemacht werden? Nun liegt der POI ja außerhalb eines Buildings?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Vagor (2021-08-28 16:23:05+00:00): Ziel war, das lila Symbol nicht durch ein editierbares gleichlautendes zu verdecken. Ist mir aber nicht gelungen. Sollte also alles rückgängig gemacht werden.
pitscheplatsch (2021-08-29 06:11:12+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110386218
eggie (2021-08-25 17:49:04+00:00): Wanneer het eerste stuk Eigen Weg is en het laatste stuk echt Verboden toegang (aangegeven) klopt het.
gr eggie
bcdsj (2021-08-25 18:01:06+00:00): Ja top, Met name dat stuk pad wat helemaal niet bestaat vond ik vervelend. Maar ik verwacht dat ik vanaf nu (we wandelen veel) op foutjes ga letten en herstellen :-)
eggie (2021-08-25 17:47:03+00:00): Lijkt me prima zo..
Het bos heb ik even laten aansluiten zodat niet een andere mapper geneigd is een pad weer in te tekenen.
Paar keer ctrl-f5 dan zie je het effect.
gr eggie
adrianojbr (2021-09-24 13:58:21+00:00): Olá, ProjetoMapeia! Por que você colocou o nome da rodovia nas saídas da BR-101?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110245438
user_2008655 (2021-11-26 11:14:02+00:00): source?
OddlyAngled (2021-09-01 15:57:13+00:00): Pinchot Pass already exists, take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6227696613
keebguy (2021-08-25 23:13:35+00:00): I used DNIT and IBGE as sources for this edit.
ibanez (2021-08-25 20:26:27+00:00): Gibt es einen Grund warum du das surface, ref und cycleway-Attribut an Weg 342396801 gelöscht hast?
64kap (2021-08-26 05:30:41+00:00): Nein, es gibt keinen Grund. Ich habe die Daten eingetragen. Danke für den Hinweis.
itineris (2022-01-19 12:46:33+00:00): Szia!

Elég sok mindent rajzoltál itt, ami tök jó. De kérlek, ne *így*!
A körforgalmak helyes címkézése "junction=roundabout", a be- és kihajtók egyirányúak, ahogy a csomópontok kanyarodó ágai is. Amiket pedig csak akkor rajzolunk be külön vonallal (a sima T elágazás helyett), ha fizikailag is el vannak választva, pl. járdaszigettel.

A körforgalmasítás során széttúrtad a busz járatok kapcsolatait is.

Voltak még egy létező út tetejére berajzolt második útszakaszok.

Ezeket mind javítottam, de jó lenne, ha máskor nem ezzel menne el egy napom.

További tipp, ha új dolgokat rajzolsz be: Előtte korrigáld a műholdkép elcsúszását! Be tudod kapcsolni a GPS nyomvonalakat, amik alapján elég jól be lehet lőni, hol megy az út. És akkor az épületek sem lesznek 5-10-20 méterre berajzolva a valós helyüktől. (Amit pedig ugye a földszinti kontúrjukhoz igazítunk, még ha egy panelnek a tetejét is könnyű körberajzolni.)

Üdv:
Ákos
bxl-forever (2021-08-26 16:39:20+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for editing the map and helping out with outdated info.

You seem to be using "Organic Maps".  Perhaps you should have a look at your settings.  It looks like you are adding French translations ("name:fr" in OSM language) while keeping the names unchanged ("name" in OSM).

I guess you wanted to change the name altogether.  Maybe you should have a look, otherwise there will be no visible changes on the map.

In the mean time, I fixed data for The Scott and Sequoia.
Dino Michelini (2021-08-28 09:44:00+00:00): Ciao, le modifiche di questo changeset hanno interessato anche la tappa 1 della TranSardinia (relazione 12859808) interrompendo la sequenza ordinata dei membri (vedi https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=12859808) a causa delle unioni fatte senza  attenzione di alcune strade. Per favore correggi interrompendo le unioni e la sequenza dei membri. Grazie
Basik71 (2021-08-30 07:21:03+00:00): Errore corretto, grazie per la segnalazione
eggie (2021-08-25 18:48:58+00:00): Feedback..  Lastig te zien met die bomen. Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster.
Soms verandert iemand wel eens wat.
Ik zal het weer uitlijnen met de Kadsterdata (BAG)
Je kunt de BAG en de BGT als transparant op de achtergrond zetten.
Mocht het nu nog niet kloppen dan kun je een terugmelding doen naar het Kadaster.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=heikant%206%20zeegse&resultOffset=0&objectId=1730200000013790&geometry.x=240181&geometry.y=565297&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=1730010000008494

Maar ik denk dat het nu klopt.. Overkappingen staan niet in het Kadaster.
eggie
ottwiz (2021-08-25 18:31:59+00:00): here local knowledge is not myself, but a friend of mine, who used to work in Morgantown.
gscholz (2021-09-04 06:21:35+00:00): Hi Gabriel,
your recent changeset have added several errors to the OSM database regarding oberlapping ways and not connected ways:



http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-53.32576&lat=-23.50070&zoom=13&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Guido
SekeRob (2021-08-25 22:20:22+00:00): Oh dear and now another fix is needed of the fixer who combined the leisure tag with amenity... Cant do that. Ill 'fix' that tomorrow.
monotar (2021-08-28 23:12:42+00:00): Hausnummer mit Komma trennen wird nicht richtig verarbeitet. Entweder du teilst das Gebäude in 2 Teile oder du setzt 2 einzelne Adress-Nodes in das Gebäude.
BollerwagenPicard (2021-08-29 12:25:02+00:00): Es war der Vorschlag von Streetcomplete
Tomas Straupis (2021-08-26 09:51:05+00:00): Hello. Please do not automatically "fix" tags as per iD suggestions, iD is suggesting a lot of incorrect and/or pointless stuff. Reverted your damage to riverbank tags.
KB-01 (2021-08-26 11:05:17+00:00): I apologize, that was careless of me. Thank you for fixing what I broke.
ivanbranco (2021-08-26 17:52:38+00:00): Hi Hafmedyaz,


Français=école primaire Mekhloufi Mekhlouf
english=school of Mekhloufi Mekhlouf

is not the proper way to add translated names, you have to use the name:xx=* 
ex. name:en=School of Mekhloufi Mekhlouf

Can you fix it?
pio2_122 (2021-08-25 22:02:58+00:00): Ślady GPS bywają niedokładne - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dok%C5%82adno%C5%9B%C4%87_danych_GPS_Podstawy
Tak też jest w tym przypadku.

Rysowane drogi proszę korygować dodatkowo wg zdjęć lotniczych (warstwa Geoportal 2: Ortofotomapa).
Pawel F (2021-08-26 08:28:03+00:00): dziękuje za uwagę, ponieważ obszar dotyczy puszczy, dlatego w tym przypadku gdy jest wąska ścieżka pieszo-rowerowa na zdjęciach lotniczych nie jest ona wyraźnie widoczna. Staram się rysować ślady bazując na sygnałach GPS i dodatkowo analizuje global heat map programu Strava, który rejestruje przebiegi i gromadzi je na wspólnej mapie.
pio2_122 (2021-08-26 12:25:47+00:00): Faktycznie, w tym przypadku tylko początek i koniec tej ścieżki jest w miarę dobrze widoczny na zdjęciach lotniczych. Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, sporo jest w tej okolicy ścieżek, które na zdjęciach prawie w całości są zasłonięte.

Dobrze wiedzieć, że dodatkowo analizujesz ślady z programu Strava :)
ma-rt-in (2022-04-10 20:33:17+00:00): Hallo,

ist die Straße immer noch gesperrt?

vg
adrianojbr (2021-10-09 13:56:46+00:00): Olá, ProjetoMapeia. Por que você desfez as alterações que eu fiz no entroncamento da BR-470 em Ascurra? Eu passei 2 vezes no local para colher os dados GPS e assim poder traçar as linhas do novo entroncamento. Por favor, tenha mais cuidado ao mapear em locais que você não conhece. Abraço.
user_2066394 (2021-09-01 20:00:15+00:00): https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=98&error=130808237
felipeeugenio (2021-08-25 20:42:42+00:00): Estimado. De qué se trata esta edición? uso clasificaciones que no tienen absolutamente nada que ver con la realidad de la zona. Por favor unirse al chat de la comunidad si quiere cambiar las clasificaciones. Se tendrá que reparar todo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110250885
aceman444 (2025-10-19 08:10:26+00:00): Zdravim, na tej dlhej cykloceste do Priemyselneho parku boli v roku 2021 (ked ste to menili) povoleni aj chodci? Podla Ortofoto to dnes tak nevyzera.
Frans S (2021-10-03 11:00:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Be sure the traces you map are buildings. You often map just bushes, trees or empty places as bulldings.
Square each building you map

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110251819
Frans S (2021-10-03 11:04:42+00:00): see attached webpage where I adjusted a number of mappings
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112028962
JenTreg (2021-08-25 21:20:46+00:00): Hi Max, I'm not sure this is the correct change. From my understanding the cycle track tag (leisure = track) is for things like a velodrome etc, where it's a separate track. This articles states 'For instance: a path that in a forest with a mountainbiking route on it, is still a highway=path.' Websites like Wandrer etc I believe use the highway tag to look for places that people could ride so removing this tag may affect things like that too. I'm not an expert on this though, but just what it sounds like to me from reading this article :) Cheers,
Jennifer 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtrack
Sykic (2021-08-25 22:30:04+00:00): Yes this is incorrect, I've reverted these changes. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking for the tagging approach for mountain bike tracks on OSM.
englu (2022-01-25 12:09:07+00:00): Wiadomo czy remont drogi 976472701 już się skończył?