piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
kapazao (2022-03-24 10:02:19+00:00): Hi, why did you add a proposed railway to a relation of a railway that is currently active?
Furthermore the proposed railway seems to be ref L3, not L1.
Could you fix it?
Regards
Emanuele Lorenzo Corti (2022-03-24 20:38:44+00:00): Hello,
I wouldn’t have added it to that relation, but I was told to do so after the proposed railway was uploaded. About L3, this is because Granada Metro will be subdivided into three lines after the railway’s construction: the third will occupy this new section.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-01-21 16:19:51+00:00): Hallo! Kleiner Hinweis. Das Rechte, ob Pferde den Weg nutzen dürfen wird mit dem Schlüssel horse gekennzeichnet (ist bereits korrigiert)
Feldberg-Ranger (2022-02-01 10:24:55+00:00): Herzlichen Dank!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-01-20 10:57:33+00:00): Hoi,

Maar waarom dan motor_vehicle=yes op die bollards?
Wellicht moped en mofa = yes erbij als uitzonderingen. 

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116375730

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-20 11:02:54+00:00): Ik heb motor_vehicle = yes verwijderd op de paaltjes.
Het gaat anders routeren voor auto's.. 
moped en mofa yes toegevoegd.
Wellicht kan motorcycle=yes er nog bij als dat is toegestaan?
MVG
eggie
Teutlepel (2022-01-20 12:24:15+00:00): Ja, motor_vehicle was bedoeld als mofa
eggie (2022-01-20 12:27:04+00:00): Oke.. maar dan is het nu correct denk ik..
Gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-29 04:40:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116730433

您好，我在这个changeset中对宿迁的所有natural=heath进行了修改，将其更改为了natural=scrub
因为经过考证，heath特指欧石楠为主要物种的荒原生态系统，对应heathland，而中国缺少这种环境，故做出了这一修改。若判断有误还烦请您手动修正。

此外，欢迎加入OSMChina进行更详细的讨论，t.me/osmchina ，这个是中国社区的交流群
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-01-20 10:53:28+00:00): Dag GJR,

Het beste kun je pdok actueel gebruiken ipv BING. 
Die laatste is verouderd en ligt vaak verschoven tov de werkelijkheid.
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2022-02-10 17:40:45+00:00): Ciao Dario, non usate OSM per fare prove, e se le fatele correggetele quanto prima per favore. Queste modifiche fanno parte di un progetto/corso? Ho visto altri nuovi utenti effettuare modifiche nella stessa zona nello stesso giorno.

Qua hai aggiunto un campo da calcio taggandolo erroneamente come un campeggio.
Dario Mellone (2022-02-12 22:02:13+00:00): Ciao. Questa modifiche fanno parte di un progetto scolastico, ma abbiamo avuto difficoltà nell'esortazione dei dati con open street map. Proverò a cancellare i dati e utenza
ivanbranco (2022-02-12 22:20:01+00:00): Grazie per la risposta Dario. 

Se siete interessati a continuare il progetto ma avete delle difficoltà un'idea potrebbe essere quella di unirvi al gruppo Telegram dove potete chiedere consiglio ad utenti piu' "navigati" che saranno felici di darvi una mano :) (oppure c'è la mailing list, la wiki ecc.)
Dario Mellone (2022-02-12 22:25:28+00:00): Grazie, ma abbiamo terminato l'utilizzo di open street map. Ho cancellato le modifiche apportate. Sto cercando di cancellare l'utenza senza riuscirci.
Jordi MF (2022-01-26 09:56:29+00:00): Havia pensat en mapejar este carrer com a peatonal perquè és de nova construcció i no hi ha calçada. En tres dies no vaig vore cap cotxe circulant per eixe tram. És veritat que no hi ha cap senyal que indique que siga peatonal o "living_street". Però  la pràctica es comporta com si ho fora. He ist que al principi tu el vas mapejar com un carrer per a vianants (pedestrian). El deixem com a highway=residential o ho canviem?
paunofu (2022-01-26 11:01:41+00:00): Jo la primera volta que el vaig vore també vaig pensar que era de vianants, però com després al passar no vaig vore cap senyal ho vaig canviar. Vaig enviar un correu a l'ajuntament i estic esperant que em contesten, perquè també ocorre el mateix amb el "carrer" que transcorre paral·lel al passeig de Jaume I. Quan em contesten et dic i canviem si fora necesari.
paunofu (2022-01-26 11:46:37+00:00): He optat per cridar a la policia local, primer comence amb el del costat de l'hotel.

És propietat de l'hotel però és per a vianants, bicicletes, patinets, ... . Per tant highway=pedestrian amb motor_vehicle=permit / bicycle=yes / horse=yes.


El que passa pel costat del passeig de Jaume I l'únic vehicle a motor que pot passar és d'emergències.

Això ja és una anècdota, el policia m'ha reconegut que a Beniarbeig falten moltes senyals jajaja
Jordi MF (2022-01-26 15:02:28+00:00): Genial! De totes maneres, si el carrer és propietat de l'hotel, jo afegiria motor_vehicle=private. Justament em vaig allotjar a eixe hotel i en cap moment em van oferir apropar-m'hi amb el cotxe, per això no crec que siga per a 'customers' ni que donen cap permís per a circular-hi ('permit').
M'encanta vore que amb una trucada es poden resoldre aquests dubtes!
paunofu (2022-01-26 16:27:32+00:00): Jo havia dit “permit” pensat en els vehicles per a abastir l’hotel com camions de begudes, bugaderia,… .
Jordi MF (2022-01-26 16:35:13+00:00): Ah, doncs està l'etiqueta 'delivery': https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddelivery
user_5359 (2022-01-21 14:25:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/206030600. Which language code ist mentioned by name:b?
katpatuka (2022-01-21 14:38:44+00:00): Thanks - well spotted! ;)

I'd added name:xx tags from wikidata and lost the 'n' of name:bn somehow ;)
user_5359 (2022-01-21 06:32:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
user_5359 (2022-01-21 14:23:28+00:00): Hello! Please notice we use lowercase character for the OSM keys!
user_5359 (2022-01-21 15:39:07+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo builing instead of building. If have corrected this mistake.
ivanatora (2022-02-01 08:17:35+00:00): Здрасти
Тази релация с маршрут "Бани - Момини Гърди" https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13456920/ сигурна ли е? 
Струва ми се че обхваща малко случайни пътеки - образуват примки и фльонги. Има и някои маркирани с access=no
Didakius (2022-02-01 09:21:02+00:00): Да, това са трите маркирани пътеки бяло-синьо-бяло към върха, само на едно място където са два успоредни пътя, съм маркирал тук (OSM) по-приятния път, че по официалната маркировка са едни голями камъняци и трошляци дето по-трудно се ходи, а и е по-стръмния вариянт на етапа
ivanatora (2022-02-01 11:09:56+00:00): Мерси. А тази маркировка изглежда ли да е нова, пътеката разчистена ли е? Преди години буквално се качвахме до горе с помощта на едно мачете... :)
Didakius (2022-02-01 11:17:56+00:00): Да, това лято са подновили маркировката, и са сложили табелки тук там, пътеките са леснопроходими, само стръмната диретисима дето води право нагоре от баните, е по-трудно проходима
skyper (2022-01-25 11:37:48+00:00): Hallo Nastia
`shop=car_repair` steht im Widerspruch zu "Gebrauchtwagen" (used car) und auch zum Namen "Autohaus". Kannst Du Dir das bitte nochmal anschauen?

Auch vermisse ich ein #Hashtag im CS.

Danke und Grüße
skyper
NastiaP1 (2022-01-26 09:05:35+00:00): Hallo Skyper!

Entschuldigung, Deutsch ist nicht meine Muttersprache, diese Übersetzung wurde automatisch erstellt.

Danke für Ihre Rückmeldung. Ich habe die Quellen überprüft und das Tag in shop=car geändert
Beste Grüße, Nastia

Hello, Skyper!

Thank you for your feedback. I checked the sources and changed tag to shop=car

Best regards, Nastia
jodd (2022-01-21 19:31:54+00:00): Hallo RedEye2063,
warum hast du denn den Kreisverkehr am Knoten Schwalbacher Straße / Ludwig-Erhard-Straße / Bismarckstraße in zwei Wege aufgeteilt?
Dabei ist passiert, dass die ÖPNV-Relationen der Buslinie 58 nicht mehr korrekt sind. Kannst du das reparieren?
VG jodd
RedEye2063 (2022-01-24 10:50:40+00:00): Hallo jodd,
danke für den Hinweis. Das war ein Versehen. Ich wollte nur einen überflüssigen "area=no"-Tag entfernen. Habe den Kreisel wieder verbunden und die Relationen gecheckt. Jetzt müsse es wieder passen.
jodd (2022-01-25 22:21:19+00:00): Hallo RedEye2063,
vielen Dank für die Korrektur!
VG jodd
Sandal man (2022-01-31 23:13:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1022829106
olvidaste las etiquetas
ozgurakyazi (2023-10-16 14:52:39+00:00): Hello, can I ask you why you changed the road type from living street to parking aisle? Wouldnt "Alley" make more sense as they are real streets but just very small?
SekeRob (2022-08-26 17:43:32+00:00): Hi Filippo,

I've removed your duplicate way mapped on top of existing ways and created a hiking route relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14507140

The remapping resolved a total of 49 mapping problems v.v. navigator issues as you can see here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125417270#map=13/41.3472/13.6385
Please let me know if this has a tappa number and if the to-from is correct or should be the other way around.

ciao


Ciao,

Ho rimosso il tuo percorso CSFN duplicato mappato su percorsi esistenti e creato una relazione escursionistica: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14507140

Per favore fatemi sapere se questo ha un numero di tappa e se il to-from è corretto o dovrebbe essere il contrario.

La rimappatura ha risolto un totale di 49 problemi di mappatura v.v. problemi con il navigatore come puoi vedere qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125417270#map=13/41.3472/13.6385

Ciao
4004 (2022-01-24 01:16:34+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
центр культуры обозначу еще как клуб, а то так просто здание с названием.
на точки (не здания) адреса можно не ставить, если адрес обозначен на здании, в контуре которого стоит точка
Lacerisa (2022-01-24 10:13:43+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо за пояснения, буду иметь в виду насчет адреса.
Tilia_J (2022-01-25 17:39:16+00:00): Goedenavond, de ingetekende oprit kruist het voetpad zonder ermee verbonden te zijn.

Service=emergency_access suggereert een toegang voor hulpdiensten NAAR de brandweerkazerne. Als brandweerauto's uitrukken kan dat gewoon via service=driveway.

Zie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Demergency_access ("A driveway to a fire station or emergency ward should be tagged highway=service + service=driveway."

Tot slot access=no. Beter "private" gebruiken, dan kunnen de postbodes en schoonmakers tenminste het terrein op.
Tilia_J (2022-02-17 17:19:45+00:00): Goedenavond Bart,

Inmiddels was de niet met het voetpad verbonden oprit als foutmelding in Osmose verschenen, en heb ik deze fout hersteld en tevens service=emergency_access in "driveway" gewijzigd.
ivanbranco (2022-02-10 17:43:38+00:00): Ciao Marz0ne. 

Ci sono un po' di problemi in questo changeset. Innanzitutto è buona pratica mettere un commento al changeset significativo, "." non da nessuna informazione agli altri mapper. Inoltre hai aggiunto una stazione dei vigili del fuoco quando ne esistevano già altre 6.

Queste modifiche fanno parte di un corso/progetto particolare? Ho visto che siete in parecchi ad aver modificato gli stessi posti negli stessi giorni.
Joseph R P (2022-03-30 21:31:08+00:00): Hello. I have reverted this changeset because you used old imagery to make it, which resulted in you deleting a new road and re-adding ones that no longer existed. For future reference, when you some across odd road alignments, I highly recommend checking other imagery available in the editor before making your edits to see if the imagery you are using is outdated.
Vika_Nosovich (2022-03-31 07:39:53+00:00): Hello, Joseph R P!
Thank you for your comment! I see I made a mistake. Thanks for your correction. I will pay attention to this in the future.
Best regards, Vika.
woodpeck (2022-01-23 12:57:27+00:00): In this changeset you removed the old "Toyota Bammer" location at house number 41 and added the address to a different location. Since other POIs in the old building retain the house number 41, it is not plausible that the new location also has the house number 41 (which you have added). Please double-check. Also, your edit has lost the opening hours that were attached to the old location. Please restore them.
MaryiaKuklis1111 (2022-01-23 16:09:25+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your feedback!!! I canceled my edits. Indeed there is some confusion with the address. I'll check it with the representative and make changes later.
eggie (2022-01-20 11:20:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Oefenen kan uiteraard wel, maar dan niet direct uploaden.
Wat heb je nu eigenlijk toegevoegd. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116380234
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-01-20 11:29:52+00:00): Feedback 
Je hebt place=plot toegevoegd.

Dat kan natuurlijk wek, maar het is wat ongebruikelijk. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dplot#Examples_in_Openstreetmap

Wat wil je er mee bereiken? Het heeft verder geen naam. Het is kennelijk het kavel dat bij de wonig hoort. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-20 11:30:49+00:00): typo.. wonig>woning.. Ik heb het vlak even losgemaakt van het wegdeel.
szalona_entropia (2022-01-20 11:30:47+00:00): ... miasta od strony zachodniej/północno-zachodniej, stanowiąca połączenie z sąsiednim miastem Gniewkowem, sąsiednią siedzibą powiatu Inowrocławiem oraz stolica województwa Bydgoszczą
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
gscholz (2022-01-21 05:31:53+00:00): Hi nyabuony,
this changeset is reverted as it created a lot of errors regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=27.97494&lat=7.69691&zoom=16&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Kind regards
Guido
Geim (2022-01-20 14:01:35+00:00): Why not update the POI that's already there?
MaryiaKuklis1111 (2022-01-20 15:27:44+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your feedback. You are absolutely right! I didn't notice the existing POI. Thanks for your attention! I fixed the mistake.
Regards, Maria
Geim (2022-01-20 15:31:13+00:00): Hi Maria, 
Great, thanks for the quick response.

Geim
SekeRob (2022-01-20 11:12:20+00:00): That did it, grassland in full view again \o/
wolfbert (2026-04-28 08:18:00+00:00): Der Veiglberg ist doppelt vorhanden, war das Absicht?
Luzandro (2026-06-18 18:07:26+00:00): durch das Übertragen aus alten Kartenblättern stehen solche Flurnamen in der basemap oft mehrfach an unterschiedlichen Positionen (beim südlichen muss man weiter hineinscrollen, bis er sichtbar wird)
VitKlim (2022-02-01 06:36:16+00:00): Please check and correct website in your edit on https://www.autohaus-woegerbauer.at/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116380964
Dimacn (2022-01-20 14:06:50+00:00): Прежде чем делать изменения в карте, изучите документацию по OSM, в частности по дорогам - статусы, теги и прочие. Иначе так и будет отвратительно.
BCNorwich (2022-01-20 15:17:36+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Nice to see someone new adding footpaths. Just a few pointers hope you don't mind. Please try not to join highways on to other features, it's not good practice and makes future editing more difficult. You've joined paths to landuse outlines and to power lines. No problem though I've corrected those few anomalies and added PRoW tags. Please have a look at my edits and maybe this will help in your future edits.

Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.
bxl-forever (2022-01-20 12:07:52+00:00): Hello,

I sent you another note about adding shops as single nodes instead of drawing buildings inside existing buildings, like here.  This will help you make better edits in the future.

I fixed this one.
mapuit (2022-01-21 18:54:16+00:00): Hi OD2022,
vielen Dank für das Eintragen der geplanten PV-Flächen. Allerdings werden in OSM i.d.R. (es gibt Ausnahmen) nur Objekte "on the ground", die vor Ort auffindbar eingezeichnet. Deswegen werden geplante Objekte nicht eingezeichnet. Objekte in Bau können als landuse=construction integriert werden. Desweiteren ist auch die Nutzung von name=Solar geplant nicht korrekt, da dies ja kein Name, sondern eine Beschreibung ist (wäre z.B. description:de).
Ich bitte dich deswegen, diese Änderungen wieder rückgängig zu machen.
Beste Grüße
mapvid
mapuit (2022-01-27 18:15:37+00:00): Hi OD2022,
habe die geplanten Solaranlagen jetzt mit proposed:plant ergänzt und den name-tag entfernt. Du kannst es dann später mit construction bzw. bei Fertigstellung einfach jeweils umtaggen und die gezeichneten Elemente bleiben trotzdem erhalten.
Grüße
mapvid
bxl-forever (2022-01-20 12:03:42+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this but I had to undo some of your changes.

If 100% of the building is devoted to being a fast-food, then you add the tags to the building itself.

It looks like the fast-food is only one part of the building, with a private door because some people like upstairs.  In that case, simply add a node ("Point") somewhere inside the building and put the tags on that node to say there is a fast-food here and do not change anything to the house.  You do not need to type the address because it is automatically calculated from the building around it.

Have a nice day.
woodpeck (2022-01-23 12:59:34+00:00): The name you have specified for this Auto dealership is implausible. The website URL you have specified does not lead to anything related to this dealership. Please fix these errors.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-01-25 07:14:05+00:00): Good afternoon. Thank you for your review. I have made all the changes according to your feedback.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116381914
rskedgell (2022-01-22 06:26:28+00:00): Do the trees exist?
Marting77 (2022-01-24 11:03:18+00:00): Thank you rskedgell for reverting this change. I had added some existing trees in Leitrim Park, plus newly (2020/21) planted ones close to Uxbridge Road. The many named fruit trees had been put in by someone else, but are an accurate record of the ancient fruit orchard which is now being cared for by a local residents group
rskedgell (2022-01-24 11:20:46+00:00): I'm discussing the idea with @syonist of adding more standard tags to the named trees (species, species:en, species:wikidata, etc.) in the hope that it makes it more useful for future data consumers.
rskedgell (2022-01-25 15:44:31+00:00): I've now added tags for species etc., although they should be checked by someone with more horticultural knowledge than me.
rskedgell (2022-01-22 06:27:20+00:00): Do the trees exist?
BorekSigar (2022-01-22 09:11:04+00:00): Yes, however they are in a nature reserve/managed forest. So there would be trees either way, no need to mark out every single one.
rskedgell (2022-01-22 13:39:14+00:00): That's not really the point. Another mapper has taken the time to map those trees, and in your other mass deletion, to identify the species (although not with species=* etc.). Whether you or I think that mapping them as individual nodes is necessary is neither here nor there.
BorekSigar (2022-01-22 18:38:32+00:00): Species of trees can be put in the forest/park fields or tags, instead of mapping every single of the 500 hundred trees that are there.
rskedgell (2022-01-23 14:48:26+00:00): Yes, you can use tags like species=*, leaf_type=*, leaf_cycle=* on a natural=wood or landuse=forest=* object. You can't meaningfully use them on leisure=park.

The trees which you deleted in this changeset do not fall within the mapped natural=wood polygons and are clearly visible as individual trees in Bing aerial imagery. Several of them also correspond to trees in the tree data supplied by LB Hounslow to the Greater London Authority in 2018 (as open data).

I am struggling to find any legitimate justification for the deletion. Perhaps you can point me to the relevant article in the wiki?
rskedgell (2022-01-23 15:05:07+00:00): The fact you have *added* individual trees in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116383073 rather contradicts whatever point you may have had. I am reverting your deletions.

Are/were you Mapper50, by any chance?
marczoutendijk (2022-01-20 15:15:41+00:00): Puoi scrivere commenti di changeset migliori che siano più facili - e migliori - da capire? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments. 
Leggi anche i commenti degli altri utenti!

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group