piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-12-12 20:40:33+00:00): monument vervangen door memorial
KoertdeVries (2020-12-13 14:44:59+00:00): OK
eggie (2020-12-12 20:33:16+00:00): adresnode hersteld. Een adres wordt niet met name op een gebouw gezet.
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Beperk je in het begin in je edits.
Lees je goed in hoe te mappen.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-12 20:29:00+00:00): Beste Koert..
is dit de naam van het gebouw?
wellicht beter description= gebruiken
De functie is niet de naam.
kijk je nog even?
eggie
eggie (2020-12-12 20:12:10+00:00): Er zijn zo van die regels in OSM
We taggen uitsluitend op de adresnodes en niet op de gebouwen.
ik zal wat aanpassen
KoertdeVries (2020-12-13 14:43:16+00:00): OK, dank voor feedback
maro21 (2020-12-12 21:30:10+00:00): Skąd jest adres Bożego Ciała 2? Na stronie, którą podałeś jest nr 1 i ten numer należy do sąsiedniego budynku: https://geoportal.wroclaw.pl/poi/pt/8319/ul.Bo%C5%BCego%20Cia%C5%82a/1
aixbrick (2020-12-13 09:57:48+00:00): Hallo,
du hast gesehen, dass die Haltestellenumbenennungen für Straeten Hamacher und Winands lt. https://avv.de/de/aktuelles/neuigkeiten/fahrplanwechsel-am-13-dezember-224713 nur für "Richtung Waldenrath" gelten?
Gruß
Trockennasenaffe (2020-12-13 10:38:13+00:00): Gelesen schon, aber offenbar nicht verstanden, was damit gemeint ist.  Heist das dann wirklich, dass man da dann zwei verschiedene Haltestellen im Abstand von 20 Metern hat? Das konnte ich mir irgendwie nicht vorstellen.
aixbrick (2020-12-13 10:59:11+00:00): Ich verstehe es so, dass die Hst in Richtung Waldenrath "Abzw. Waldenrath" heißt, die Gegenrichtung aber weiterhin "Straeten Hamacher". Ich bin allerdings auch verwirrt, denn den Sinn erkenne ich nicht...
Im Fahrplanbuch steht "Straeten Hamacher/Abzw. Waldenrath": https://avv.de/files/avv/files/fahrplaene/linienfahrplaene/472_avv.pdf.
aixbrick (2020-12-19 10:46:46+00:00): Ich habe mich nun etwas intensiver damit beschäftigt und Fahrpläne und Open Data vom AVV geprüft. Nur die beiden Hst auf der Birgdener Straße und der Turmstraße wurden umbenannt. Die jeweils anderen beiden (bei "Straeten Winands" fehlte eine in OSM) haben ihren Namen behalten. Außerdem wurde offenbar irgendwann die Hst "Straeten Küppers" in "Straeten Grundschule" umbenannt. Ich habe das alles angepasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96103521.
aixbrick (2020-12-19 10:50:36+00:00): Nachtrag: AVV Open Data ist m.M.n. auch fehlerhaft.
Trockennasenaffe (2020-12-19 10:50:48+00:00): Vielen Dank
aceman444 (2020-12-14 16:39:31+00:00): Zdravim, naco je dobre dat na budovu addr:city a addr:street bez housenumber? Hlavne ked v dome uz su body s kompletnymi adresami. Ale uz som to niekde videl, zrejme nejaky vymysel editoru iD. Prosim nerobte to, su to neplatne adresy. A cisla ako 3-7 tiez nedavaju velky zmysel, hlavne, ked uz existuju spravne rozpisane jednotlive adresy.
Frans S (2020-12-13 10:10:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping 
Please map each building individual in a row.
How to deal with mapping quite a number of identical buildings
First map 1 building very precise and squared. Then, with the building still selected, copy it and past it on the new location.
When you have repeated that and a row of buildings, you can also select a number of buildings and past them as a group.

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95735063
eggie (2020-12-12 20:10:33+00:00): Beste Koert.. Lokale mappers willen weten wat je hebt aangepast.
Je hebt adres Stoombootkade 10 verwijderd. Bestaat dat adres niet meer. wanneer een restaurant verdwijnt blijft het adres intact.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=95735097
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-12 20:17:42+00:00): adresnode hersteld..
user_5359 (2020-12-13 04:46:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
eggie (2020-12-12 20:19:35+00:00): Beste Koert.. je mapt maar door zonder om te kijken.
access=no betekent verboden toegang voor iedereen. Het lijkt me verstandig dat je eens kijkt naar je voorgaande edits
bicycle=yes is default op wegen. dat hoef je niet aan te geven
eggie (2020-12-12 20:20:25+00:00): Je ziet ook dat de weg niet meer goed te zien is. dat lomt door access=no  Hier mag niemand komen. Wandelaars dus ook niet meer.
eggie
eggie (2020-12-12 20:45:34+00:00): access=no verwijderd  Het zal anders niet goed routeren en dat zal toch vast wel je bedoeling zijn.

een highway=track met een breedte van 1 m zal hoogstwaarschijnlijk een highway=path zijn. Kijk je nog even naar je edits?
MVG
eggie
KoertdeVries (2020-12-13 14:45:59+00:00): OK
Dakon (2020-12-14 20:34:49+00:00): Wann sollen die Bahnhofstraße und der Klosteramthof den asphaltiert worden sein?
Hansekogge48 (2020-12-15 16:04:07+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
eggie (2020-12-12 20:54:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. De regel construction= path zal ook nog wegmoeten.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Dakon (2020-12-14 20:37:25+00:00): Die Dächer sind in meinen Augen alles mögliche, aber nicht flach. Woher hast du Info?
Hansekogge48 (2020-12-15 16:02:58+00:00): Danke für die Info.
FoeNyx (2020-12-21 22:54:23+00:00): Il y a déjà une indication de falaise 10m à l'Est, ça ne fait pas doublon ?
Papa-Yankee-Bzh (2020-12-22 09:17:25+00:00): Exact, je ne l'avais pas vue J'ai supprimé mon rajout.
Merci pour la vérification ! :-)
eggie (2020-12-12 20:56:29+00:00): Oke... maar dan nog wel even de regel construction=footway  weghalen.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-12-12 21:41:31+00:00): Oke... denk dat de tegel met note=  ook nu weg  kan.. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-12-13 07:49:58+00:00): tegel?  > typo > regel
survey_date kun je ook aanpassen.
Probelnijs (2020-12-13 07:57:30+00:00): Bedankt weer! (Zie wijziging #95746032 , note weggehaald en survey date upgedate)
eggie (2020-12-13 08:02:19+00:00): Top!
multimodaal (2020-12-23 21:44:45+00:00): Hoi Probelnijs,
Dank voor je bijdragen!
Toevallig: wij waren hier net een dag na elkaar.
3 kleine tips nog:

1. Gebruik footway alleen voor echte voetpaden in zoals bedoeld in de verkeersregelgeving. Het pad over de Wisenniabrug was heel bewust een path ipv een footway gemaakt, er staat namelijk geen verkeersbord G7 en het is ook geen trottoir. Je mag hier dus -anders dan een aantal andere Singelparkbruggen- dus ook overheen fietsen. Pas ten westen van de Houtmarkt staat een bord "Voetpad" en is het een footway. Ik heb de weg dan ook weer teruggezet van footway->path

2. Als je -zoals in het geval hierboven- een waarde ziet die je vreemd vind, kijk dan via de geschiedenis van het object wie de mapper is die dat heeft geplaatst en vraag het even na, daar kunnen beide partijen wat van opsteken (-:
3. Investeer wat tijd in een overstap naar JOSM, daar ga je plezier van hebben

Happy mapping!
flohoff (2020-12-13 09:18:17+00:00): Moin,
nur gerade zufällig gesehen - Hier bei den neuen Adressen hast du immer nur Straße und Hausnummer hinzugefügt - Keine Postleitzahl oder Ort. ist das mit Absicht?

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95736892
Ropino (2020-12-13 11:43:11+00:00): Moin,
es ist noch nicht so lange her, da kam die Frage genau anders herum:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86002869
Für mich wäre eine klare Logik: mit oder ohne city/postcode lieber, als das schwammige: "Weitere Adresstags sind optional, da sie aus den Grenzrelationen ermittelt werden können."
Ich bin relativ viel in NRW+Sachsen unterwegs: In beiden Bundesländern gibt es mMn keine klare Linie ob mit oder ohne, sondern ist ein Flickenteppich. 
Ich wünsche einen schönen 3. Advent
Robert
flohoff (2020-12-13 11:48:41+00:00): Moin,
die Diskussion kenne ich und die ist IMHO Falsch - Zumindest partiell. Es gibt z.b. 33428 Marienfeld. Das liegt im Admin Level 8 von Harsewinkel. Du kannst da addr:city nicht ergänzen aus den polygonen weil das falsch wäre. Und das ist an vielen anderen admin 8 ebenso.

In meinem Validator werfe ich die Adressen ohne Postcode/City auch als Fehler raus.

Ich validiere unter anderem postcode/city über die admin und postcode boundaries. Ist eine schöne Redundanz um Fehler zu finden.

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=addresses-nrw&layer=addresserror#51.94558,8.86742,16z

Flo
Ropino (2020-12-13 15:11:00+00:00): Moin,
ich kann die Adressdaten zukünftig -soweit mir möglich- mit city/postcode versehen. 
Über lokale Besonderheiten bin ich auch schon gestolpert.
Deinen Validator habe ich mir mal mit in die Lesezeichen gelegt.
Schönen Abend noch
Robert
Frans S (2020-12-13 10:14:27+00:00): Hello Thanks for mapping
Only buildings and roads needs to be mapped.
Please keep yourself to the instructions
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95737492
Frans S (2020-12-13 10:16:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
You mapped a building on a wrong way
Please read the guide or the video how to map a building
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95738020
Carto'Cité (2022-01-27 18:46:28+00:00): Bonjour Luc,
Tu as passé cette voie verte en piste cyclable mais il s'agit bien d'une voie verte :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499022703
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499022702
Il faut donc laisser highway=path :)
N'hésite pas si tu as des questions ou des remarques.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
gurglypipe (2020-12-14 21:21:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for your recent edits. What’s your reasoning for changing this from highway=track to highway=bridleway? On the ground, this is a track. Its legal designation as a bridleway is already tagged separately as designation=public_bridleway. To my eye, the map now contains less information about the type of highway on the ground. Were you making this change to highlight the bridleway in the rendered map tiles? Ta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95738482
user_2066394 (2020-12-12 22:26:16+00:00): Der Zaun ( barrier=fence ) ist aber immer noch da? War der Spielplatz falsch eingetragen?
axelschulz (2020-12-13 13:18:00+00:00): Den habe ich noch nie gesehen. Die Minigolfanlage wurde vor ca. 10 Tagen abgebaut, der Zaun ist seit ca 2 Tagen weg. Fällt mir auf, weil ich fast täglich daran vrobei laufe :-)
user_2066394 (2020-12-13 13:26:01+00:00): Einwandfrei, dann kommt das nach sechs Jahren mal auf den neuesten Stand :-)
user_2066394 (2020-12-13 00:06:23+00:00): width=*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:width
dónal (2020-12-13 18:42:33+00:00): Feedback: only add points at the corners of the building. make sure you trace only the outline of the roof (not any shadows) - can be hard to tell the difference some times. square off your buildings too.

I'll will edit and show you the difference...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95738787
dónal (2020-12-13 18:47:14+00:00): Building has been edited. You can see the change here: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/884220518
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95738787
Leo Slager (2020-12-13 00:10:35+00:00): Dag Arichikato,
helaas is de schade die is toegebracht aan de routerelaties van de buslijnen zeer omvangrijk.
Dat wordt veroorzaakt door de editor iD waar je mee werkt. Die editor kan niet goed omgaan met wijzigingen van relaties.
Alle elementen die je toevoegt komen namelijk niet op de goede plaats te staan in de relatie.
Als je serieus met routerelaties aan de gang wilt, dan adviseer ik dringend om over te stappen naar de editor JOSM.
Daarmee kun je de routerelaties correct bewerken zodat alle elementen van de route in de juiste volgorde staan.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
Ik zal de schade repareren. Kijk daarna nog eens nauwkeurig hoe zo een routerelatie er uit hoort te zien.
Arichikato (2020-12-13 15:00:33+00:00): Bedankt voor de feedback en het herstellen van de routerelaties, ik zag dat enkele busstations niet terugkwamen of niet waren gemapt. Ben niet van plan om hevig alle routerelaties te mappen :)
Frans S (2020-12-13 10:08:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please map more accurate, don't cross other features and square the rectangular buildings you map.

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95739112
user_5359 (2020-12-13 04:37:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I am sorry but your business isn't part of the road ID21 (always corrected). But did you know the key tourism (for the motel, caravan_site/camp_site) and the tag amenity=fuel?
Feel free to add more details to your commercial areas.
havenhotsprings (2020-12-19 02:25:00+00:00): Thank you for letting me know and for the extra tips.
martianfreeloader (2023-12-29 22:57:55+00:00): Hi,

This part of the railway seems to be completely gone with no visible traces anymore. Can it be removed from the map?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/884223244
alessandrocarmeli (2023-12-30 12:25:47+00:00): absolutely no: it is better if you can use tags like disused:railway
martianfreeloader (2023-12-30 12:35:56+00:00): What do you mean by "better"?

There is a consensus that we map things only if they can be verified on the ground. If there aren't any visible remains, it should not be on OSM: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_historic_events_and_historic_features

See also "Such features will still have some physical form reflective of their former use visible in the landscape." in the documentation of the abandoned:* prefix: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:abandoned:*#Description
James Derrick (2021-03-11 18:46:09+00:00): Hi  jimstn,
Are you aware that you've upgraded the access to South Nelson Road to highway=tertiary please?
This modest access to the industrial units is still highway=service:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234777747/history

It looks like you may have had an editing issue splitting the way to create relations for the Town Council 'Tubeway Map', and created a new stub way as highway=tertiary:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/884223293

Can I suggest retagging this stub as highway=service?
Thanks and Happy Mapping.

James
jimstn (2021-03-18 20:38:13+00:00): Well spotted, now fixed. Thanks!
Cascafico (2020-12-13 20:14:56+00:00): qual'è il problema il "vandalismo" che avrei commesso?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95739426
ndm (2020-12-14 20:05:59+00:00): This looks more like a (mechanical) edit to remove stiles from bridleways? Has this been agreed on talk-gb?
Richard (2020-12-14 20:10:18+00:00): No, it isn't a mechanical edit at all. If you can do mechanical edits with Potlatch 2 then I'd be impressed to find out how ;)

Bridleways don't have stiles - bridleways are RoWs that are open to horses and bikes, which can't cope with stiles. If there's a stile on a bridleway then I've tried to move it to the side (which you do see sometimes, where there's a gate and a stile adjacent) or onto the adjacent way where it was clearly meant for a joining footpath but had been mistakenly placed on the junction node. If there's one I missed reinstating then let me know!
ndm (2020-12-14 20:25:14+00:00): FYI: a mechanical edit can be done by hand - just a set of unsurveyed armchair edits - supposedly fixing the same item.

I believe that there are things called horse stiles - unless you survey them you won't know what the issue was. And without a note on OSM then local mappers won't know that you've just modified stuff without surveying.
Richard (2020-12-14 20:38:08+00:00): Right, so if it was a horse stile it would be barrier=horse_stile, not barrier=stile.

I'm at a loss to understand your point, I'm afraid. At the very worst interpretation then this is correcting something evidently wrong (a stile on a bridleway) to something less wrong. That's how OSM works, it iterates towards completeness. If you want to take the next step towards making it even better than that's great!
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-14 20:57:03+00:00): "Bridleways don't have stiles - bridleways are RoWs that are open to horses and bikes, which can't cope with stiles."

Stiles should not be present there, but for example illegal stiles may be present there.
ndm (2020-12-14 21:20:17+00:00): None of the new "guessed items" have any sort of fixme on them.
eteb3 (2020-12-14 21:22:15+00:00): Or, someone may have tagged a horse_stile as a stile, especially if they're a new mapper; and/or they may be a horse-rider who assumes that 'stile' on a bridleway will always mean a horse-stile, not the other sort. That would mean the error correction is [ barrier=stile > =horse_stile }, rather than moving or deleting.

Have you looked through the history of the stiles to see whether they were added before, after, or with the bridleway designation? That may help explain why they were there.

Do the changesets give a source? I would be very, very wary of making this sort of bulk edit in any case, but if the stiles were added with "survey" as the source, I would absolutely go and revert.
Richard (2020-12-14 21:24:47+00:00): @ndm: wait, what? There are several fixmes in this changeset.

I mean, honestly, go ahead and revert this if it'll make your day. It'll make OSM on balance significantly worse, but you do you.
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-13 15:47:59+00:00): Hi José Luis Winteracter, welcome to OSM.

It's a good practice to edit only local areas and not all over the world like this edit.
This update will be seen by many people all over the world!

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-13 16:12:06+00:00): Why did you change the landuse tag to a fixme key of the following way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184368575
José Luis Winteracter (2020-12-13 16:47:54+00:00): As you can see there are farmyards, water and even parts of the town of Manteca inside this "farmland". So I've tagged it for myself improving it.
DaveF (2020-12-15 19:47:47+00:00): Hi
In OSM we don't tag 'for ourselves', we follow certain rules.
You should have left the existing tag & added a separate fixme.
DaveF (2020-12-15 20:24:08+00:00): Hi again
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12010801
This is incorrect relation tagging. Please look up on the wiki.
dónal (2020-12-13 12:49:34+00:00): Please ensure you provide good changeset comments so other mappers can understand the intent of your change. "k" is not a good comment. :(
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95739588
dónal (2020-12-13 13:05:21+00:00): This change also seems to have resulted in the island no longer being mapped. It is likely your change will be reverted.

See https://osmcha.org/changesets/95739588/ or https://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=95739588 to see the visual change.
Hedaja (2020-12-13 16:01:03+00:00): I fixed the mistake. I kept your newly drawn precise coastline but added it to existing island.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95739588
BeJotEl (2020-12-20 11:55:01+00:00): Warum wurden hier Haltestellen zu Zufahrten, Gebäuden und Swimmingpools geändert?
gurglypipe (2020-12-13 11:12:26+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits.

I’ve reverted this changeset because it looks like you accidentally dragged a node of the fence so it crossed the railway line and joined Park Road Gardens. There didn’t seem to be any other changes in this changeset.

Can you please use more informative changeset comments in future, as it lets people know the intent behind your edits, and quickly find ones which are relevant to their interests. ‘details’ is not very informative! See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Ta!
ivanbranco (2020-12-15 21:26:22+00:00): Ciao Simone,

benvenuto su OSM. Vedo che stai modificando il nome di molte vie da "Via" in "via". Ti suggerisco di dare una lettura alla wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions in questo caso particolare il punto interessato è "Il nome dell'area di circolazione si scrive con l'iniziale maiuscola per i termini “Via”, “Piazza”, ecc."
ivanbranco (2020-12-20 16:55:29+00:00): Ciao Simone, aggiunto altri appunti. Noto un po' di confusione con il "condominio Rondinera". A parte il nome in minuscolo, hai applicato il nome "condominio Rondinera" a cinque diversi elementi (2 relazioni e 3 building part). Inoltre ci sono etichette ripetute, tra cui lo stesso address  inserito cinque volte, che dovrebbe però essere univoco e inserito come punto in prossimità dell'ingresso. Il condominio è presente sia come relazione di tipo type=building che type=multipolygon. Del multipolygon non vedo il senso in quanto non ci sono inner e l'outline risultante è un duplicato dell'altra relazione. Vedo anche un po' di confusione con i tag access, tra cui tag per i cavalli che trovo strani per un garage. Per fare un esempio a caso la way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/884227328 è segnata come cycleway ma è collegata al resto della rete tramite una scala con acces bycicle=no. Anche se sono scale valuta un bycicle=dismount. Ti consiglierei di sistemare quanto già mappato prima di procedere con nuove modifiche, se hai domande sono a disposizione per quanto novizio anche io.
trigpoint (2020-12-25 18:18:08+00:00): Hi, please could you add meaningful changeset comment that describe what you are aiming to achieve. Details tells me nothing.

Cheers Phil
Frans S (2020-12-13 10:19:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
Please select the correct imagery,
You used BING instead of the project imagery
See this document how to change that
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95740331
BCNorwich (2020-12-16 19:15:38+00:00): Hi, You've duplicated a lot of features here, buildings and walls. Could you please have a look and remove the duplicates? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
miraculixOSM (2020-12-17 21:56:17+00:00): Errors fixed. Thank you for your hint. 

Best regards and a Merry Christmas

Harald
eggie (2020-12-13 07:45:16+00:00): Dag afmdebruijn,
Hier heb ik landuse=construction toegevoegd anders gaat een andere mapper weer de voorgaande landuse intekenen. 

MVG,
eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-01-18 11:00:43+00:00): Hello,
According to http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=820873589 , in this changeset you removed the place tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/820873589 .  This is vandalism, and will not be tolerated in OSM.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
(see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4628 , a separate long-term block)
zuicz (2020-12-13 21:15:56+00:00): Perony nie wyświetlają się na mapie, prawdopodobnie przez tag covered=yes. Czy perony są w całości pod zadaszeniem?
matix849 (2020-12-14 12:26:23+00:00): Perony są zadaszone tylko częściowo. Właśnie zachodziłem w głowę dlaczego się nie wyświetlają na mapie. 
Dzięki za komentarz, zaraz to zmienię.