piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2022-05-15 20:05:59+00:00): Vraag:
Is er een weg door het pand, waar de verkeersdeelnemers in -en uitrijden?
skquinn (2022-05-15 14:31:49+00:00): Notes 3016623 and 3016629 *
user_5359 (2022-05-16 09:45:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the booth tags
El Porvenir CR - Café Especial y Turismo Experiencial = Alimentación y hospedaje
natural = Turismo Rural
? As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2022-05-16 11:08:47+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1059029470. What is the meaning of the tag zzz = 233-?
AwoowoArne (2022-05-16 13:26:05+00:00): Thanks for reaching out. Indeed that was a wrong tag I produced. I deleted it.
Herrieman (2022-05-15 22:07:25+00:00): Dit noemt men een stepover, geen ladder, aangezien het maar een (of twee) 'tredes' zijn. Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=stile.
Ik heb het aangepast.
felipeeugenio (2022-05-15 16:35:47+00:00): Hola Jaime. Esas calles de servicio que borraste no existen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121015774
user_3022894 (2023-04-13 20:30:55+00:00): Hallo Niederpruem,

der Name Otto-Schell-Weg ist für das Stück, auf dem du hier den Namen entfernt hast, laut der offiziell Webseite der NRW-Geodatenverwaltung (https://www.tim-online.nrw.de/tim-online2/uebersicht.html?) richtig, auch wenn dieser vor Ort ggf. so nicht ausgeschildert ist.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Niederpruem (2023-04-16 15:21:56+00:00): oha, die Straße heißt natürlich Otto-Schell-Weg und ist auch genau so ausgeschildert.
Ich habe es gerade geändert.
Danke für die Info. TIM-online habe ich mir auch abgespeichert.
user_3022894 (2023-04-16 18:11:08+00:00): Super, danke dir!

TIM-Online ist in der Tat oft nützlich, z. B. um Straßennamen zu bestimmen.
Badojo (2022-05-15 15:32:46+00:00): Pozdrav, ceste koje nisu razvrstane kao državne (sa oznakom npr D28) se ne označavaju sa oznakom primary, nego secondary ili tertiary
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-16 15:12:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 121048763, 121051595, 121042542, 121056525, 121045980, 121054295 where the changeset comment is: revert undocumented building import by giorgio92 that created lots of overlapping buildings
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-16 15:12:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 121048763, 121051595, 121042542, 121056525, 121045980, 121054295 where the changeset comment is: revert undocumented building import by giorgio92 that created lots of overlapping buildings
ivanbranco (2022-05-15 16:58:26+00:00): Ciao giorgio92,

questo è chiaramente un import. Ci sono delle linee guide per effettuare import su OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Qual è la fonte di questo import?
ivanbranco (2022-05-15 17:06:40+00:00): Se non è un import è comunque una procedura discutibile. Ovviamente gli edifici non hanno questa forma, inoltre  li hai taggati tutti come residential e alcuni sono sovrapposti a edifici già precedentemente mappati, come qua ad esempio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060272289

Chiaramente non è un edificio residenziale essendo l'edificio di una sottostazione dell'Enel.

Qual è poi il significato di area_ha=190.2197 che è stato aggiunto a tutti i building?
Jrachi (2022-05-15 17:07:50+00:00): Ciao.
Usi un plugin o disegni con i morbo di Parkinson?
Jrachi (2022-05-15 17:09:27+00:00): Quello che hai aggiunto non assomiglia a quello che si vede sulle ESRI.
Passi da racchiudere gruppi di case come unico edificio a case che richiedono pochi nodi ne usi una 20-30 ina
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-16 15:12:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 121048763, 121051595, 121042542, 121056525, 121045980, 121054295 where the changeset comment is: revert undocumented building import by giorgio92 that created lots of overlapping buildings
giorgio92 (2022-05-17 07:10:52+00:00): I used a plugin to digitalize earth maps
user_3022894 (2023-04-18 17:59:13+00:00): Hallo Niederpruem,

erst einmal entschuldige bitte, dass ich es schon wieder bin.

Allerdings ist mir auch hier eine Kleinigkeit aufgefallen.

Bitte keine Adressen mithilfe des addr:-Tags-Schemas zu Parkplätzen hinzufügen. Die addr:-Tags sind vorgesehen für Objekte, die eine tatsächliche, vergebene Adresse haben (an die man also bspw. einen Brief schicken könnte oder die Hausnummer vor Ort vorfinden könnte).

Im hier vorliegenden Fall hat ein anderer User die von dir getaggte Adresse von dem Parkplatz wieder entfernt,
u. a. deswegen wollte ich dich auch darauf aufmerksam machen.

Dies wurde im OSM-Forum (weiß nicht, ob du das schon kennst) an folgender Stelle diskutiert: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/haben-motorradparkplatze-oder-recyclingcontainer-adressen/79445

Alternativ kann man an Parkplätzen das object:-Schema nutzen.

Dabei einfach statt addr:street object:street und statt addr:housenumber object:housenumber usw. nutzen.

Wird bspw. in Düsseldorf sehr ausführlich genutzt
(Beispiel für das object:-Schema in einem Park: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142782581).

Viele Grüße
Lukas
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-16 15:12:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 121048763, 121051595, 121042542, 121056525, 121045980, 121054295 where the changeset comment is: revert undocumented building import by giorgio92 that created lots of overlapping buildings
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-15 15:21:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 120942301, 120942436.
kortgodt (2022-05-18 10:35:00+00:00): gangsti gennem sø?
PT-53 (2022-05-24 07:05:30+00:00): Hallo theoneandonlygiraffe,
Du hast diese TR
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14140974/history
neu angelegt und als Art "only_u_turn" angegeben.
Diese Art ist unbekannt, was zu Routingproblemen führt.
Sollte das eine "no_u_turn" werden?

Wiki:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:restriction
QS-Tool-Turn Restrictions:
- https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/?zoom=19&lat=49.31879&lon=8.547628&layer=Grayscale&overlays=TTT

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
bxl-forever (2022-05-15 17:01:42+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.
For websites, HTTPS is preferred over HTTP when available.
Don’t worry, we fixed it, and added some more tags.
Carto'Cité (2022-12-15 07:36:44+00:00): Bonjour norsud,
Concernant ce chemin, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334305883 ; Caux Seine Agglo nous avaient indiqué ce chemin comme cyclable mais visiblement (Ortho Express 2022, Maxar, etc.) il ne l'est pas. Je le laisse quand même en path car le mettre en footway ne correspond pas bien au terrain (il n'est pas interdit aux vélos) et à la pratique : pas de signalétique ou pas un trottoir=path.
N’hésite pas à me contacter si tu veux échanger sur ces sujets :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
ivanbranco (2022-05-15 17:27:42+00:00): Hi z-z-z88,

the name tag is to be used only for proper names, not for description or to describe other features (you can use note=* or description=*).

If it's a free toilet open to anyone you can use access=yes+fee=no

Good mapping :)
z-z-z88 (2022-05-15 17:37:35+00:00): thank you, fixed that : )
maraf24 (2022-10-22 22:01:44+00:00): Ruch rowerowy na skrzyżowaniu Prusa i Górnickiego nie odbywa się tak, jak zmapowałeś. 
Odbywał się tak, jak było poprzednio zmapowane.
maraf24 (2022-10-22 22:19:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566086704
To usunięte surface było tam celowo - chodziło o fallback dla narzędzi, które nie rozumieją cycleway:surface i footway:surface.
Z tego powodu powinno tam być przynajmniej surface=paved.
Mordechai23 (2022-10-24 12:35:12+00:00): to już chyba lepiej paved niż surface który się zgadza tylko do połowy
maraf24 (2022-10-28 10:43:48+00:00): Jeśli założymy, że każdy uwzględnia tagi *:surface=*, to tamto tagowanie było ok.
Đuro Jiří (2022-05-15 21:47:41+00:00): Aggiunta fontanella*
Carto'Cité (2022-12-15 07:10:23+00:00): Bonjour norsud,
À ce que j'observe, cette piste est bien une piste sur trottoir malgré la présence du panneau C113. Il n'y a pas de trottoir en face donc les piétons l'utilise et il s'agit d'un trottoir sur lequel de la peinture a été ajoutée. Et il semble bien qu'il soit à sens unique pour les cyclistes mais cela a peut-être changé.
Je modifie dans ce sens mais si tu as des informations sur des changements n’hésite pas à me dire et je corrigerai.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
PT-53 (2022-08-03 05:20:39+00:00): Hallo philzi;
Du hast an diesem POI
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5358328912/history
das Merkmal
- disused=yes
gesetzt. Das ist veraltet und wird somit im OSM-Inspector als Fehler gewertet.
Richtig wäre
- shop=fabric
abzuändern auf
- disused:shop=fabric
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
milos21 (2023-07-28 15:30:33+00:00): Ahoj, nejaká zmena, lebo cyklotrasa 5442 bola oficiálne len dole po Starý hrad, lebo som si všimol že je značené pri CHPS a aj to len čiastočne. Inak, ty si mazal moju cyklotrasu bez farebného značenia oficiálne povolenú v návštevnom poriadku NPMF? Hoc išla krkolomným terénom, ale vtedy bola jediná dovolená neznačená cyklotrasa na CHPS.
Filip009 (2023-07-28 15:53:58+00:00): Tá cyklotrasa 5442 je aktuálne úplne odveci. Keď som bol niekedy dávnejšie pešo na Chate pod Suchým bol tam smerovník, že trasa 5442 ide až ku chate. Tak som tvoju trasu vymazal a trasu 5442 som predĺžil. V máji som si všimol z vlaku, že ku Starému hradu ide žltá trasa. Tak som ju v júni prešiel na bicykli a na základe prieskumu som tie trasy upravil. Viď fotky na freemape.
milos21 (2023-07-28 16:09:24+00:00): Hmm, na starších zdola je stále zelené C, ale na tvojej novej už žlté C. A z opačnej strany na križovatke pod Jedľovinou na tvojej foto je len modré C bez zelenej odbočky na CHPS a na križovatke pod Suchým je odbočka zelené C na Varín. V teréne je to teraz fakt ešte horšie ako bolo...
milos21 (2023-07-28 16:10:35+00:00): Ale ak by to bola pravda a konečne oficiálne pretrasovali zelené C na Varín, tak hurá po rokoch a sláva tomu človeku ktorý povolenie dokázal vybaviť :D
Filip009 (2023-07-28 17:40:08+00:00): Ono to nevyzerá tak, že by ho pretrasovali. Aktuálne to vyzerá tak, že tá zelená ide nikde. Má len 2 smerovníky. Značenie dolinou je už zastarané, nie je dobre viditeľné, aj preto som sa rozhodol trasu do doliny nedať do mapy. Taktiež zjazdnosť tej cesty dolinou je na bicykli nulová. Hore treba tlačiť a dole ide o život.
milos21 (2023-07-28 17:56:17+00:00): Takto:
1) po starom zelena končila dole pri Starom hrade, bol tam slepý koniec, presne tak ako tam slepo končí žltá
2) ďalej pokračovala len neznačená ale povolená v návštevnom poriadku (to platí stále). Viem aká je, šiel som len raz, v zime, smerom dolu, na utlačenom snehu sa to dalo, aj bola zábava :)
3) predpokladám že v minulosti pokračovala až hore, preto tie zbytky na stromoch, tiež som ich videl
4) ten smerovník hore myslím bol vždy, aj so šípkou na Varín (ale len tam, nikde inde do Varína zelené C nikdy nebola). Predpokladám, že mali veľké plány ale v povoľovacom procese narazila kosa na kameň a už sa nikto neunúval demontovať namontované hlúposti.
5) myslím si že môj kompromis bolo to najlepšie východisko, hoci som mal výčitky svedomia že som tam na  mape posielal cyklistov to toho hrozného kamenistého stúpania, ale nijak inak sa oficiálne cyklotrasa na CHPS nedala nakresliť
milos21 (2023-07-30 15:32:32+00:00): Skúsil som nájsť kompromis a zmeniť trasovanie nech to má zmysel. Všetko je v changeliste a poznámkach jednotlivých trás
Filip009 (2023-07-30 18:27:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139160792
Tá zelená bola lepšie tak, ako bola.
milos21 (2023-07-31 05:33:41+00:00): Tak v NP sa nemôžu označovať cyklotrasy len tak. Znovu som pozrel návštevný poriadok a jediná legálna cesta na CHPS je cez Hradskú dolinu a kedže inak v teréne to nie je jednoznačne značené, tak nemá zmysel označiť zeleným C len ten jeden kúsok pod chatou bez spojenia s “civilizáciou”.
Filip009 (2023-07-31 06:29:43+00:00): V realite tam hore sú smerovníky aj zelené C-čka. Mapujeme realitu, nie to čo je na papieri.
milos21 (2023-07-31 08:02:57+00:00): Ale v realite to môže byť aj pozostatok neexistujúcej zrušenej trasy (nie tento konkrétny prípad) to len pre upresnenie. Lebo podlma starého značenia sa zdalo že na biku sa treba teleportovať pod CHPS a až potom je dovolené šliapať. Urobím ešte jednu zmenu a spojím oba názory do jedného :)
milos21 (2023-07-31 08:04:29+00:00): Teda pozerám že si to už urobil :)
user_12523467 (2022-05-15 18:35:30+00:00): you have corrected it with this:

https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%B9%D9%86%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%86_%D8%B3%D9%8A%D8%A6
__________
I fix it
user_5359 (2022-05-15 20:09:51+00:00): Thanks!
os-emmer (2024-02-12 12:14:29+00:00): Hello Kovoschiz,
was it on pourpose that you used operator:short_name=* additionally to operator:short=*? In my eyes operator:short_name=* could be removed as it contains the same information.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056840860
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator#Further_details
user_5359 (2022-05-16 10:45:57+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/121018996. What is the meaning of the tag "nameVVV": "Лесі Українки провулок"?
user_6110846 (2022-05-16 12:12:41+00:00): corrected
gscholz (2022-06-02 04:28:26+00:00): Hi kseltar,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.51842&lat=-25.36565&zoom=12&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121019027

Can you please fix this?

My impression is, you do not know how to handle multipolygon relations properly. Please educate yourself:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind Regards
Guido
depewtyl (2022-05-19 17:01:59+00:00): * Restaurant
voschix (2026-01-24 22:43:36+00:00): Vedo che hai cambiato tanti marciapiedi in ciclopedonali. 
Perché?
1723jghgasd847 (2026-01-25 12:53:29+00:00): Tanto tempo fa funzionava così, ad oggi ci sono le "ciclabili" separate, è da sistemare
voschix (2026-01-25 13:26:17+00:00): Non capisco la tua risposta. 
Per le ciclopedonali ci deve essere la segnaletica, e non la trovo.
La maggior parte gli avevi inseriti inizialmente e correttamente come marciapiedi.  Poi hai cambiato tutti in ciclopedonale, ma non c'è traccia di segnaletica.
1723jghgasd847 (2026-01-25 17:24:08+00:00): fratello hai ragione che ti devo dire, che ne so di cosa mi passava per la testa 3 anni fa
voschix (2026-01-25 22:14:52+00:00): OK. Non ti preoccupare. Faccio io nei prossimi giorni.
1723jghgasd847 (2026-01-26 11:53:39+00:00): Grazie e scusa 🙏
Mastrick_Mapper (2022-05-15 16:32:11+00:00): Incorrect changeset comment.
Allow pedestrian access to cycleways.
MxxCon (2022-05-16 03:32:46+00:00): Is this place open again? I'm seeing news articles and other sources that it was shut down
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121019366
user_5359 (2022-05-26 08:36:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/697848859. What is the meaning of the tag highway=drtt?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-05-28 15:53:45+00:00): sorry, it was a mistake, i changed it now
MxxCon (2022-05-16 04:13:03+00:00): This revert/edit doesn't make sense.
You tagged the whole way that goes ALONG a road as "crossing:unmarked". That incorrect. Also just because people are crazy enough to walk along a road doesn't mean that's part of the official road network. Furthermore, the way you connected it at Continental Ave intersection also doesn't make sense from the routing point of view.
And regarding the existing path, informal=yes is the correct way to tag desire paths.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121019687
gscholz (2022-06-02 04:28:13+00:00): Hi kseltar,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.51842&lat=-25.36565&zoom=12&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121019707

Can you please fix this?

My impression is, you do not know how to handle multipolygon relations properly. Please educate yourself:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind Regards
Guido
mavl (2022-06-10 15:51:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122217199 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6055].
SekeRob (2022-05-17 10:35:44+00:00): Hi,

The problem persists, there's farmland mapped inside a greater farmland relation but the Stazione Radioastronomica di Medicina has now changed from inner to outer as it no longer is 360 enclosed by the same farmland relation, so I've changed the latter's meadow outline as temp fix. Fortunately this is just farmland and not forest as that would have given some interesting render results in Carto.

cheers
Lola Fox (2022-05-17 17:14:16+00:00): I'm sorry if I wrong something. My will was to restore the exact farmland mapping, but maybe I something went wrong. If I must to do something, let me know. Last question: why the single buildings I've mapped, are not visible? Thank you.
SekeRob (2022-05-17 17:56:51+00:00): Hi, the immediate problem of the meadow was fixed. Looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3598469#map=12/44.5170/11.8048 it seems there are currently no broken relations with the large farmland, so not fixing what's not broken ;O)

ciao
Mirecnet (2024-10-28 10:34:23+00:00): Nazdar,
zaujal ma plot v Striebornici pri Uhrovci a Uhroveckom hrade. Cela dolina je obohnana plotom, ako Zapadny Berlin :)
Nie je tam ziaden zroj a ani nic. Existuje to, je to daka zvernica, alebo co ?
Patr1k_P (2024-11-01 15:40:47+00:00): nazdar, predpokladam ze myslis tento plot https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1059873965

ja som ho vsak nekreslil, ale len upravoval, pretoze pretinal vela ciest...autora a nejaku diskusiu najdes tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120936729
Mirecnet (2024-11-03 07:05:15+00:00): Siel som okolo a padlo mi to do oka, ze co je to :)
Dik moc za info.
mavl (2022-06-10 15:51:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122217199 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6055].
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-16 19:37:53+00:00): r u sure that the footway nearby the connection SP67/SP17 with the SR445 exist? doesn't seem like
MrLusignana (2025-11-16 20:32:25+00:00): Grazie per avermi contattato. Presumo che ti riferisca al sentiero che parte dal santuario sul lato nord della SP67/SP17 e prosegue verso sud per unirsi alla SR445 di fronte alla proprietà denominata "La Pineta" (n. 84). Ho percorso questo sentiero il 14 maggio 2022. All'epoca era segnalato con segnavia CAI rossi e bianchi e non c'erano ostacoli.
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-17 22:02:20+00:00): Quello che coklegaa sp61/17 alla città Castiglioncello; sei sicuro che esiste? da tante immagini aeree/satellitari non si vede il percorso
MrLusignana (2025-11-18 08:31:43+00:00): È difficile spiegarlo senza inviarti immagini aeree/foto/tracce GPS. Se mi lasci il tuo indirizzo email ti farò avere una risposta esauriente. Il mio indirizzo è andrew@badgergate.com
notmyproblem1 (2025-11-19 11:41:35+00:00): fiokolyisa@duck.com
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-18 12:20:29+00:00): You accidentally added highway tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12907482
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-05-18 12:43:08+00:00): thank you
Stylez995 (2022-06-12 14:23:45+00:00): Heisann kunyasobe! På snuplassen nederst på Dokkveien er ikke del av gågate. Her er det jo mange biler her. Husk at gågate-taggen (highway=pedestrian) impliserer "motor_vehicle=no" (forbudt for motorvogn), så det kan hende at GPS-programvare som bruker slik data kan feilaktig lede vekk fra plassen som er ellers tillatt. Hvis du ikke vet om det foreslår jeg at du besøker stedet selv, eller bruke Mapillary. Jeg har fikset til "unclassified". Har du spørsmål så kan du svare her, eller ta det til forumet. :)
WoodWoseWulf (2022-05-15 22:20:38+00:00): Hi Paulbd!

I have disconnected Meatte Park from the roads that surround it so that it's easier to edit in the future and the boundaries are more accurate.

Let me know if you have any questions!
user_5359 (2022-05-16 09:12:50+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73729897. What is the reason of two address information for this house? Did you know the possibility to mark one address as old?
Spider 001757 (2022-05-16 16:42:16+00:00): Hello. This building has officially two addresses. Approximately 100 m from the building is municipality boundary Turany/Krpeľany. Now 321/6 belongs to village Turany. Before that, however, according to the housenumber, it belonged to the village Krpeľany. The boundary has probably been moved. So the new number in the village Turany is 1182. I can see both addresses (321/6 Krpeľany: https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/13537531?pos=49.126391,19.082090,18); (1182 Turany: https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/stavba/865788/1182/2/3493_6/ADMINISTRAT.BUDOVA?pos=49.126507,19.083051,18)
I don´t know what to do with that, because for example house on Príjazdná cesta 323/7 is in Turany now too. But before that it was also in Krpeľany. The old address from Krpeľany 323/7 is still used.
Have a nice evening!
Commodoortje (2022-05-15 21:18:35+00:00): Goed bezig!
APneunzehn74 (2023-02-16 09:30:52+00:00): Hey aus welchem Grund hast du den Kapuzinerstadl als wheelchair=no eingetragen? Die Zugangstür hat lediglich eine kleine Schwelle, im Gebäude befindet sich ein Aufzug und eine Rollstuhl gerechte Toilette. 
Grüße APneunzehn74
gscholz (2022-05-20 05:06:36+00:00): Hi ajk,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Reserva de la Biósfera Bosques Templados Lluviosos de los Andes Australes":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-71.97465&lat=-39.80454&zoom=10

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121022228

Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-06-04 09:17:45+00:00): Hi ajk, 
this error still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
ivanbranco (2022-05-15 19:29:31+00:00): Ciao Angioi, benvenuto su OSM!

se modifiche cose geograficamente lontane tra loro crei aree del changeset enormi che ingombrano la history locale degli altri user, vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Inoltre ci sono dei problemi in questo changeset: hai creato molti duplicati disegnati in modo approssimativo. Qua per esempio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060313023
hai creato un pond (stagno/laghetto) di 6.175 km² mappato con soli 18 nodi, che si sovrappone al già correttamente mappato Lago Rukwa ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1771115/history ).

Sarebbe meglio sistemare questi elementi prima di procedere oltre. Se hai domande e dubbi chiedi pure, se riesco rispondo.

Buon mapping!
ivanbranco (2022-05-15 19:43:43+00:00): Qua addirittura hai creato il terzo duplicato di un lago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060313026/
era stato disegnato per la prima volta nel 2013, una seconda volta il 13 maggio, una terza da te oggi intorno a mezzogiorno e una quarta volta con questo changeset