piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-06-29 22:59:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
santamariense (2019-06-30 00:36:52+00:00): Olá. Estive revisando sua edição. Parece estar tudo OK. Qualquer dúvida que tiver não hexite em perguntar.
Participe do grupo OSM RS no Telegram: https://t.me/osmrs | Também temos o grupo SM https://t.me/osm_sm
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71745378
santamariense (2019-06-30 00:44:31+00:00): "Parque" devem ser apenas os espaços público reconhecidos pelo município como sendo um parque. Definitivamente isso não é um parque https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700593277. É puro e simples pátio de casa.
Quanto ao muro https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6579186887 , vou passar por ali para ver se há obra de arte nele mesmo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71745428
santamariense (2019-06-30 00:49:06+00:00): Você excluiu uma árvore. Tem certeza que aquela árvore em específica não existe mais lá?
E não fica inventando coisa onde não tem. Você marcou isso como gramado https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700593737. Nem precisaria conhecer o local para saber que o que tem ali é simplesmente RUA. Bastaria olhar as imagens de satélite.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71745480
BCNorwich (2019-06-30 06:17:04+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Features added to the OSM database must be verifiable, please see this link :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

I can find no evidence of a company at this address.

If the company cannot be verified at this address by other folk then a false impression of physicality is given. Thus the POI should be removed. 

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-07-05 19:13:46+00:00): No response so POI removed.
BCNorwich (2019-06-30 07:03:04+00:00): I give up!
viloan (2019-06-29 23:28:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
dekatherm (2019-11-07 21:21:11+00:00): Hi Adamant,

I am much in favor of your general cleanup work, but why have deleted the "park:type" here? It was the only way to detect the park type without doing string matching.

Best regards
Adamant1 (2019-11-08 02:37:07+00:00): Hi dekatherm. Thanks for the encouragement on my cleanup efforts. It's much appreciated. 

Unfortunately, I'm not sure why I deleted the park type tag in this particular instance. Generally though park:type isn't a good way to describe parks IMHO. As things like "state park" are more about ownership then an actual description of the object and most of them where originally added through old imports. There's a park:type page on the wiki talking about it's depreciation (which in full disclosure I was involved in). If you think it's better to retain it in this case though, I am perfectly fine with that. As nothing fits every situation. 

Adamant1
Adamant1 (2019-07-02 09:10:06+00:00): Nope. I'm not doing this crap with you. I said leave me and my edits the hell alone. So do it. I didn't say I would never re-tag a park again. I said I was done discussing it with you because of your threats, attitude, and inability to not go off or consider feedback. Again, you go off about how I contact you when you say not to. Then you contact me. I'm done with this and your endless harassment. Especially after you threatened to sue me for slander while you keep saying worse things then I did. Stop telling me what to do and don't contact me again like I asked you repeatedly not to. Period.
Adamant1 (2019-07-02 10:17:15+00:00): (For further reference also see changeset 71432976. Where SteveA already contacted me about this after I already asked him not to talk to me anymore and where I already addressed this subject in detail.)
Adamant1 (2019-07-02 21:25:06+00:00): This kind of long, unproductive message full of personal attacks and comments like "Perhaps sticking to fence lines and "adding stuff" is more Adam's kind of mapping" are the epitome of going off and are the exact opposite of civil. I gave a detailed and civil response about this already in changeset 71432976. Which you had every opportunity to respond to in a substantive, constructive manor. It's not on me that you decided not to and went with this kinds of un-constructive personal messages instead. Your allowed to disagree with me that things should be tagged a certain way or not, but your continued negative attitude toward me and my edits crosses the line into the verbal abuse and harassment. You have plenty of opportunity to go about this civilly and you haven't. 

So, as I said before, I'm done with you and I'm done with anything having to do with the subject AS IT RELATES TO YOU. Respect that and drop it already. Don't message me about it again. I've already reported you twice for your arguing and attitude and if you contact me again in the same manor you have been, especially as it relates to this subject, I'll continue reporting you until it actually has an effect.
stevea (2019-07-02 22:42:43+00:00): The suggestion to stick to mapping Adam already knows is intended to give him a positive path towards productive mapping, should he choose to take it.  It is precisely crafted to BE civil.  It was/is not meant as an attack, though it may qualify as damning him with faint praise.

Whether Adam and I "disagree" about how something should or shouldn't be tagged is a red herring, a trick magicians and deceivers use to misdirect attention.  The real issue here is that Adam spectacularly failed in any ability to discuss in a civil matter the matter of park:type (a wiki he started):  opportunity HE squandered.  He fouled that discussion miserably with virtually constant abusive invective, then when he uninvited himself from further discussion (which he appears to be unable to do constructively), he targeted my recent improvements to Public Lands tagging to "remove park:type tags ANYWAY, be DAMNED the fact there is an active Discussion going on." This, in the wiki Adam himself started, then fouled.  Then he trails my map edits and tosses me a middle finger that he'll edit the map any old way he wants?  That's so clearly disrespectful of our map I don't need to say anything further about it.  Yet that's what happened here.

I am not arguing.  I am pointing to Adam's behavior and calling it what it is.  I don't like this (at all) and ask for relief from the DWG and other higher-ups in OSM from Adam's near-constant abuse, slander, invective, untruths, exaggerations, mischaracterizations and most important of all, pollution of data in our map with not only bad data, but very bad acts on how to reach civil agreement about how GOOD edits in our map SHOULD happen.

I have offered and continue to offer a gentlemanly approach, I believe others see that and see Adam's behavior for what it is.  Let the chips fall where they may, and soon please, as I'm certain the entire community is completely fed up with Adam's burn-it-all-to-the-ground approach to virtually everything he says and does.  That isn't hyperbole, go look up Adam's activities for yourself.  It makes me grateful we are an Open project, as I have nothing to hide.
mapman44 (2019-07-03 00:24:53+00:00): https://jtbogden.blogspot.com/2011/01/you-cannot-win-argument-dale-carnegie.html
freebeer (2019-07-03 13:54:46+00:00): how is it that i have had reasonably civilised conversations with both parties, yet here things fall apart in a way i do not like to read in me drunken state (if you're gonna flame, be creative, you wunch of bankers.  no that's not creative)

i'd quote iandees but personally i'd give up.  and that's after five beers on a summer day (not quite 30 yet) which i will probably regret after a couple hours of sobering up.

never map drunk.  or browse changeset comments.  never do anything drunk.    never drink.  water excepted.

p.s.:  bench is cast iron supports now.
Adamant1 (2019-07-03 14:11:32+00:00): No clue. Maybe being drunk would help. I map buzzed sometimes, but it mostly leads to me staring at the map in some random place without blinking for long periods while mumbling "wow" repeatedly. So, I don't think it would help the conversation any. Except maybe to cause it to not occur in the first place. Which would be totally great in my book. 

Anyway, talking about benches have you seen those park benches with metal spikes where you have to pay to sit down? At least your not sleeping on one of those. 

What's the opposite of namaste for when your leaving? Whatever it is, I'll go with that.

Adamant1
woodpeck (2019-07-03 22:16:11+00:00): For reference, both users being asked to play nice in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2989 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2990
Adamant1 (2019-07-04 04:30:36+00:00): Woodpeck, I appreciate yours and the DWG's involvement in this finally. While I'm 100% responsible for my own behavior and have zero urge to "play the victim", I would appreciate it if you could clarify a few things for me so similar things don't happen in the future. So I was wondering if I can private message you about this. Without my questions being taken as a bad faith move or as an insult to you and other DWG members. 

Thanks
stevea (2019-07-04 04:59:57+00:00): I'd say to ask it in the open and it would be better.
stevea (2019-07-04 08:41:00+00:00): Adamant1 just contacted me via private message after being told many many many times that this is unwelcome, yet he persists in doing so.  He appears to be trying to "do something" by this (and keeping it private) after above he immediately asked to do this (keep it private) with woodpeck.  I find this disingenuous at best and downright deceitful at worst.

As I have said many times, and as Open is our first name:  this sort of dispute does not end well by being spoken about in hushed tones behind everybody's back.  It only benefits by being spoken about in the open.

Let's keep any discussion with full candor in the open, please.  What woodpeck wrote was unambiguous, as clear as crystal to me; it seems anybody would able to understand.
stevea (2019-07-04 09:37:35+00:00): "anybody would BE able to understand."
Adamant1 (2019-07-04 13:07:52+00:00): I contacted you privately to say I wasn't going to respond to your comment here because I didn't want to get us both in trouble for discussing things publicly when we were told not to. He was pretty crystal clear about us not contacting each other. Which you did, again, after being told not to. I was trying to save your skin by saying privately to leave it until he responded. I don't want either of us to get banned. That's it. The message was ultimately to your benefit. Not mine. I'm not sure why your doing things contradictory to that or why your insulted by me trying to keep us from getting in trouble by private messaging you after you contacted me first. So it wouldn't be yet another useless public argument like this is already starting to turn into. I guess your heads just not at the same place as mine though and that's fine, but there was no bad intent behind any of my actions. Anyone can private message anyone for whatever reason anyway. Although, I said in the message I rather have these conversations out in open. Which you seem to have ignored. 

As I explained in the private message, I would be 100% open to asking my questions here if Woodpeck is OK with it. I asked if I could private message him because it was what come up off the top of my head and also because I didn't want to run over the arbitrary allotted comment length we keep getting called out on. That was it. I was also clear that I would say the exact same thing here I said in the private message. It had zero to do with being disingenuous or deceitful. There's no way to be deceitful if I'm repeating exactly the same thing in both places. Obviously. 

Ultimately I have zero preference for where I ask the questions or even if I get to ask them at all. It wasn't that important anyway and it's definitely not worth all this. Honestly at this point, I rather just skip it and go on to doing other, better things in OpenStreetMap. I"m sure everyone else would prefer it also. So that's probably what I'll do. For the benefit of everyone. I don't think you even read the private message. If you had of, you would have noticed that me asking the questions would have been to your benefit. I guess that's down the drain now though due to how your acting here and that it made me decide it's just not worth it. Sadly, it never was. 

Anyway, I won't be responding to you here or anywhere else again. Let alone contacting you in private or public at all. Id appreciate it if you honored the wishes of everyone involved, including both of us, and do the same. Since your the one that initiated contact again when you were told not to. There was zero reason to comment about my message to Woodpeck. There was probably zero reason for me to make this comment also, but whatever. Such is life and the draw back of staying up way late. 

Thank you and goodbye to everyone. Off to sleep. Hopefully to map another day (fingers crossed). 

Adamant1
stevea (2019-07-04 23:32:44+00:00): I did not contact the individual known as Adamant1 as he said I did above; that is yet another of his untruths.  I did state in this public place that he private-messaged me after being warned — an hour before by an administrator who blocked him as well as by me (at least a dozen times) — to (yet again) NOT CONTACT ME.  I, stevea, consider such continuing behavior by the individual known as Adamant1 as criminal electronic harassment under California Penal Code §653.2 and §646.9.  "No" means "no."  Civil remedies are available to me as well.  This is not "playing victim," it is black-letter law.  My experience of harassment is real, the damages to my reputation and OSM are real.  If anyone wishes to now characterize me as "whistleblowing," that's fine with me.

The perpetrator keeps saying "I won't be responding..." yet he keeps responding.  Make of that what you will, OSM community.  There was not "zero reason" for me to comment, we were just told to avoid contact, yet Adam back-channeled both of us (keeping his words in the dark from each other and the community).  It should be obvious to all what his "partitioning" does here; nothing more need be said about it.

I have no idea why things aren't clear to Adam.  Things are crystal-clear to me:  my four-word reply to woodpeck said "Sounds about right, thanks."

Less talk; more mapping.  Map.  Map well.
stevea (2019-07-04 23:51:01+00:00): OSM community:  I once again apologize to you for this spectacle and the difficulty I faced in dealing with it.  I will strive to continue to do my best in facing these (hopefully rare) frictions as they occur should they rear their ugly head in the future.  And may it never happen to you or your OSM fellow volunteer contributors.  If it does, I only ask that you do your best to identify bad behavior as you see it and point it out to the greater community with aplomb and civility.
BCNorwich (2019-06-30 07:04:38+00:00): Capital letters for names please!
BCNorwich (2019-06-30 07:07:15+00:00): Capital letters for names please!

Could you amend your mistakes before addin more feature to the map please. 

Also inform your coordinator of these problems. If you are not taught properly you'll continue to make mistakes.
korolenok (2019-07-05 11:17:47+00:00): Are these really parks? Probably just landuse=grass/natural=wood
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71745900
MattSTL (2019-07-09 18:58:33+00:00): These interstitial areas within intersections (known locally as "islands") are managed as parkland.  The grass is regularly seeded, weeded, and mowed.  Trees are trimmed.  Often, flowers and bushes are planted.  In most cases, they are publicly owned, and maintained by the same municipal staff that maintains larger parks.  Such lands are indistinguishable, either legally or practically, from municipal parks, even if they have no specific names.  In the remaining cases, they are owned in common by all residents of the surrounding subdivision (generally through a trust), and maintained in the same manner by private contractors or volunteers.  So, the park tag accurately describes this urban landuse.  Tagging these as parkland also avoids confusion from the dispute over whether natural=wood should describe undeveloped woodland.

Incidentally, the same dynamics govern the wide municipal land strips separating single-lane roadways heading in opposite directions ("median strips" locally), and large swaths of intensively-maintained private lands, whether they are held open to the public (as in Concordia Seminary) or not (as in the Carrswold subdivision).
5m4u9 (2019-07-01 23:19:18+00:00): hola, es recomendable que los nombres no sean todo en MAYUSCULA, en la mayoría de los casos, deben estar escritos con las iniciales y el resto en minuscila... por ejemplo: San Jacinto, San José, La Tapera, Café Show y así....
viloan (2019-06-30 00:17:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
jmapb (2019-07-11 16:26:28+00:00): Hi JessAk71, just wondering where you're getting the data for all these building details?
JessAk71 (2019-07-11 18:15:39+00:00): Hi jmapb, its a combination of different sources mainly looking at 3d aerials from google to count levels by hand or to determine what the 3d shapes look like. otherwise from looking for websites of the developer, news articles, or wikipedia these details can be found.
jmapb (2019-07-14 18:41:41+00:00): Gotcha. I've done a few of these 3D buildings based on data and zoning diagrams from the NYC dept of buildings -- but it's kinda labor intensive. You did so many at once I thought you might have a secret.
JessAk71 (2019-07-16 00:18:29+00:00): ha i wish, no its always a long process agreed. this one took more than a hour but the majority are simple boxes (no complex shapes) and really most of them are just plain old building:levels tags with no 3d info. The birds eye view and 3d aerial photos and counting the levels is really the most expedient absent any detailed diagrams... ill leave the job of doing complex geometries to someone else :)
Takogin (2019-07-05 13:37:28+00:00): Hi, the right way to tag this roads is service. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
Can you correct your changes please?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71746604
nevw (2019-06-30 23:40:35+00:00): I have removed the industrial area you placed over a residential housing area and a roadway for the second time.
This is a public map and you need to add things to the map that exist in real life.
If you want to map fantasy items use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenGeofiction instead.
TravGW (2019-06-30 12:56:29+00:00): Do not make fictitious edits to the map. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's time and will not be tolerated.
TravGW (2019-06-30 12:56:31+00:00): Do not make fictitious edits to the map. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's time and will not be tolerated.
geow (2019-06-30 20:27:03+00:00): Hi Micha2307, danke für deine Ergänzungen in Aschau i.Chiemgau. 

Eine Kleinigkeit, die mir aufgefallen ist: Du hast bei diesem barrier=stile access=no ergänzt und access=foot/bicycle von yes auf no geändert, siehe 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1478178355/history

Damit sperrst du den Zugang komplett ab, zumindest werden Router-Apps und andere Datennutzer das so interpretieren. 

Da die Zugangsbeschränkung (falls überhaupt rechtsverbindlich) zeitlich beschränkt vom 01.11-15.04 gilt, könntest du das besser mit einer zeitlich bedingten Beschränkung abbilden, also z.B. foot:conditional=no @ (Nov 1-Apr 15)

Details siehe
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions

opening_hours=* ist hier übrigens nicht passend und kann dann gelöscht werden.

Danke für deine Beiträge zur OSM-Datenbank!

geow
TravGW (2019-06-30 12:56:33+00:00): Do not make fictitious edits to the map. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's time and will not be tolerated.
Paul_012 (2020-03-27 10:08:31+00:00): A place=city object always represents the municipality. The province is represented by the boundary relation. I've removed the redundant objects.
Leo Slager (2019-06-30 08:06:47+00:00): https://www.google.nl/maps/@51.9781422,4.1285496,3a,15y,187.76h,81.23t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1su4XK409wRJye4l4yr_RQgA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Je wijziging van de naam in Robobank  kan worden beschouwd als vernieling van de kaart. Als je zo doorgaat kan je account geblokkeerd worden.