piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
assenizator (2018-10-26 02:25:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator (2018-10-26 02:26:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator (2018-10-26 02:26:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
viloan (2018-10-25 23:00:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
streckenkundler (2018-10-26 05:33:53+00:00): Hei... bist du dir sicher? Es kann auch eine Mauterfassungssäule sein... 
Fragt Sven nach
mbirth (2018-10-26 07:47:28+00:00): Also ein Blitzer ist es in jedem Fall. Mautsäulen sind blau/grün. Der da ist schwarz. Ich weiß halt nicht genau, ob die Kamera in Gegenfahrrichtung für Motorradfahrer ist (damit das Kennzeichen mit drauf ist), oder wirklich nun auch in Gegenrichtung blitzt. Und ausprobieren wollte ich das nicht.
streckenkundler (2018-10-26 12:43:29+00:00): Ah... Danke... ich hatte das Ding auch bei Mapilliary gesehen, da war die Ausleuchtung auf dem Bild aber suboptimal... Daher die Nachfrage...
Dann betrachte ich das als geklärt.

Viele Grüße, Sven
voltairovicz (2018-10-26 15:54:25+00:00): Zgadzam się i popieram
clay_c (2018-10-26 21:48:41+00:00): Good tagging, good outline!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63884322
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-26 13:07:46+00:00): It is nice that you mapped cementery at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638033628 - but repeating landuse tag in name:pl tag ("name:pl=cmentarz") is something that should not be done
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-10-26 13:08:17+00:00): Discussion in pl forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=722361#p722361
mapper999 (2018-10-26 19:41:52+00:00): Was ist der Sinn und Zweck von access=no an der Kaiserstraße?
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2018-10-26 19:55:31+00:00): Passt doch ...
Niemand darf rein
- außer Fahrräder (bic.=desig. sogar)
- und Fußgänger (die adressiert das Schild nicht)
--- und hier noch wegen Zusatzzeichen (außer am Anfang) noch Kraftfahrzeuge.
... aber keine Reiter, Kutschen, Ochsengespanne und keine Ahnung, was es sonst noch so gibt, daher vorsichtshalber access=no und die Dürfenden positiv formuliert.
mapper999 (2018-10-26 20:40:39+00:00): Also in der StVO ist zu Zeichen 244 nur von Fahrzeugverkehr (vehicle=no) die Rede, ansonsten wären ja Fußgänger auch nicht erlaubt.
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2018-10-26 21:09:32+00:00): Ja, so ist es ja getaggt:
access=no
bicycle=designated wg. 244.1
foot=yes wg. kein Fahrzeugverkehr
motor_vehicle=yes wg. Zusatzzeichen außer am Anfang
Rest nicht, insbes. Kuschen, Reiter, Schafherden etc. nicht, s.a. § 28 (2). Auf Köddel rutscht man als Radler aus, wenigstens die sollte es also in Fahrradstr. nicht geben, sonst macht das alles ja keinen Sinn!!!!1 ;-)
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2018-10-26 21:10:52+00:00): Handwagenführer, wenn auf dem Gehweg kein Platz ist nach § 25, auch nicht!
Etc.
mapper999 (2018-10-26 21:50:44+00:00): Ok, nach §28 sind Tiere (außer Hunde) wohl tatsächlich nicht in Fahrradstraßen erlaubt, also horse=no. Erlaubt sind aber auf dem Gehweg z.B. auch inline_skates, Roller (ohne Motor), Schlitten etc. (§24), also ist access=no falsch.
Schienennagelhammerträger (2018-11-04 11:43:56+00:00): Hab's mal interessehalber im Forum zur Diskussion gestellt:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=723710#p723710
skorasaurus (2018-10-27 19:42:41+00:00): nice job on the edits, thanks
Президент Ирака (2018-11-13 14:12:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM,
even though you correctly deleted duplicate, it contained additional information. I copied it to existing poi.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-17 12:07:06+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3445519 ?
mariotomo (2020-12-15 19:54:07+00:00): hola Victoriano Lorenzo.  espero todavía estés mapeando, interesado a estas comunidades.  las nuevas fotos aéreas cuentan muchos cambios.  quizás te interese revisarlo.  sólo: cuidado con amenity=school: eso se refiere a todo el área ocupada por la escuela, no al edificio de la escuela.
keithonearth (2018-10-26 00:17:27+00:00): links to the notes:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/475277
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/475257
chachafish (2018-10-28 14:44:29+00:00): Howdy :) Thank you for your additions to the map. Quite a number of houses here are tagged with an "N" prefix. Actually, in Denver anything 1st Street and north would not have an "N" or "North" prefix, so it should be deleted. Also, there are quite a few prefixes labeled, "E" here. Each of these should be spelled out as, "East". Could you make the necessary changes? Cheers! :)
nevw (2018-10-26 10:17:55+00:00): I reverted the edit as a trunk road is not probable here.
mueschel (2018-10-27 13:10:30+00:00): Hi,
you added 20 ways with the tag "turn lanes" instead of "turn" or "turn:lanes".
Could you have a look and fix these?
Thanks, Jan
chachafish (2018-10-28 14:38:52+00:00): Howdy :) Thank you for your additions to the map. Quite a number of houses here are tagged as being on "Oneida St", "Olive St", and "Pontiac St". The "St" should be spelled out as, "Street". Could you make the necessary changes here? If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Cheers! :)
chachafish (2018-12-25 12:47:36+00:00): Hello, just a reminder, there are still quite a few errors here. "Street" should not be abbreviated as "St." Could you correct your errors here? Thanks :)
freebeer (2018-12-05 14:41:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65206943 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me alpine hut in the tropics
nevw (2018-10-26 10:24:18+00:00): Your edits have been deleted as they seem to be nonsense and vandalism.
This is a public map.
Supaplex (2019-02-06 17:13:10+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
chachafish (2018-10-29 13:41:04+00:00): Howdy :) Thanks for your additions to the map. I'm following up on some OSM Inspector-tagged errors. If you go here, you can see each red dot is tagged as an error: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-105.52666&lat=39.73585&zoom=17&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber_lenient,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way
chachafish (2018-10-29 13:43:29+00:00): Most of the houses here are tagged as being on Highway 103. I assume this is the same road as Chicago Creek Road. Is the confusion that the Chicago Creek Road tag should be changed to Highway 103? Or, should the houses be changed to being on Chicago Creek Road? Cheers! :)
tekim_drcog (2018-10-29 15:27:45+00:00): I don't understand what the problem is.
chachafish (2018-10-29 15:47:39+00:00): Hi :) The issue is that the houses imported here are not attached to the map. They're like islands that are isolated from the rest of the world. They need to be attached to the map; attached to the road in front of them. The road in front of them is named Chicago Creek Road, but they are listed as being on another road; Highway 103. For example, if I create a house that sits on Mulberry Lane, but I give the house an address of 105 Broadway Street, then the house is addressed incorrectly. Either the street name is incorrect or the house address is incorrect. For the map to function correctly, the house address and the street name have to match up. In this case, the house addresses that were created don't match up to the road in front of them. Do you see what I'm getting at? Cheers :)
tekim_drcog (2018-10-29 16:05:14+00:00): Highway 103 and Chicago Creek Road are the same, at least on the section in front of these houses.  OpenStreetMap shows this and I can attest from personal observation that this is in fact the case.
tekim_drcog (2018-10-29 16:08:22+00:00): The way in front of these houses is part of this OSM relation:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1516589#map=13/39.6998/-105.5455

which is tagged , 
ref=103
network=US:CO
(i.e. Colorado State Highway 103, aka Highway 103)
nevw (2018-10-26 10:31:21+00:00): Your edit has been reverted based on previous map tagging and your recent non-sensible edits.
This is a public map.
nevw (2018-10-26 10:49:09+00:00): reverted this as no tags on added way and no evidence of existence on satellite imagery.
This is a public map.
clay_c (2018-10-26 21:47:40+00:00): The tagging looks good. Make sure the name is capitalized properly. This building doesn't look like it's a perfect rectangle according to the satellite imagery - could you add some more detail?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63886767
mavl (2018-12-25 00:17:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:38:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Leno$M (2018-10-26 17:26:39+00:00): El comment para este Changeset fue repetido por error técnico

Debería decir: "Mapeado de Semaforos y otros detalles basados en traza GPS"
mavl (2018-12-25 00:12:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:50:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
assenizator (2018-10-26 13:14:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
mavl (2018-12-25 00:29:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
assenizator (2018-10-26 13:17:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator (2018-10-26 13:18:13+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Frans S (2019-01-09 14:58:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am reviewing mappings to check if they comply with the instructions and free of errors. 
A few remarks. 
Please tag buildings as building=yes. not as building=house.
There are quite a number of L shaped buildings. please map them more precise. (you tend to map them bigger than they are
Best regards and please keep mapping
mavl (2018-12-25 00:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2019-07-21 11:31:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:31:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-10-26 06:17:37+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 63864825, 63864904, 63864969, 63865107, 63865348, 63865829, 63866742, 63869044, 63869212, 63871569, 63871715, 63871831.
flohoff (2018-10-27 14:14:22+00:00): Hi Ratz,
kannst du mir erklären warum der Landuse https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638126104

nicht am Zaun aufhört sondern die Bankette der Straße mit beinhaltet. Ich halte das für Falsch. ein Meadow ist am Zaun zuende - da kann auch kein Vieh mehr rauslaufen.

Flo

Flo
eggie (2018-10-26 06:36:36+00:00): Je verandert het weer op precies de "verkeerde" manier.
flohoff (2018-10-27 14:12:30+00:00): Hallo Ratz,
auch hier hast du wieder eine Willkürliches verspriungen den landuse=residential Richtung Straße eingezeichnet. Im Luftbild ist deutlich zu sehen das es eine Bankette vor dem Haus gibt die offensichjtlich nicht zum landuse=residential gehört sondern zur Straße.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63812863

Flo
Allroads (2018-10-26 22:44:21+00:00): Je hebt de Eikenlaan, maar vooral Sportlaan ( 63879614) wat betreft ligging verandert. Nu ligt de weg, haast in de berm.
Alle wegen zijn daar uitgelijnd voor zover mogelijk op basis van Gemeentelijk ingemeten data, BGT omtrekgericht. Die je als laag in Josm er onder kan leggen. 
Ook forest ligt nu op de weg.
Jammer.
Waarom moest je deze weg verplaatsen?
Voidmapper (2018-11-05 16:21:33+00:00): Beste Allroads,

>> Waarom moest je deze weg verplaatsen?
Net zoals alle wijzigingen die ik doe: Ik heb de weg verplaatst omdat de versie zoals die op het moment van bewerken op de kaart stond niet overeenkwam met (mijn waarneming) in de werkelijkheid. Ik ben verder niet bekend met gemeentelijk ingemeten data. De hoofdreden voor het verplaatsen was dat de rotonde aan het eind van de Sportlaan niet klopte. Bij het aanpassen van de rotonde bleek de Sportlaan zelf ook niet te kloppen met de GPS-meting aldaar. Na controle met de luchtfoto's (ook daar lag de Sportlaan scheef) en de al aanwezige landuse (de laan zoals aangetroffen lag JUIST op de forest, een verdere indicatie van een scheve mapping) zou dat toch voldoende aanleiding moeten zijn om een weg te verplaatsen.

>> Ook forest ligt nu op de weg. 
Dat was reeds het geval, en is nu juist flink verminderd. Overigens is dit niet perse fout, als er een weg door een bos loopt hoeft natuurlijk niet per se de landuse opgeknipt te worden. Sterker nog, het lijkt in het hele gebied fout te gaan…: https://postimg.cc/N9D71ZK6

Ik ben best bereid de Sportlaan terug te zetten naar de originele staat, maar daarvoor doe ik wel graag nog een survey om te checken wat er dan precies niet klopt. Mogelijk klopt de wijzigingenset niet 100%, maar klopt nu al veel beter ten opzichte van de situatie vooraf. Even mijn wijzigingenset door de JOSM-reverter halen toont de situatie voor de wijziging: https://postimg.cc/v48yhV25 dit klopt in ieder geval NIET. (Dit: https://postimg.cc/PvMcv6j9 is als het er uit hoort te zien en nu ziet).

Groeten,
Voidmapper
Allroads (2018-11-05 19:54:53+00:00): Wat betreft forest, heb je gelijk, dat was al het geval, en moet in die omgeving in zijn geheel aangepast worden. Zag jouw naam staan ter hoogte van de scouting op de polygon, bij nader inzien, het je de andere kant van de polygon aangepast. scouting zijde.

https://postimg.cc/v48yhV25
Deze ligt wel goed!! Ik ben daar een paar maanden geleden nog geweest. Speciaal voor Openstreetmap, wegens fietsbebording. De weg daar is geen rotonde, de ligging is daar ook niet rond.
Of het moet zijn dat het daarna verandert is, wat ik niet geloof, heb geen gemeentelijk indicatie van tijdelijke afsluiting.  

Sportlaan ligt zeker nu niet goed. Lag goed.
Deze heb ik uitgelijnd met gebruik van BGT en AHN3 (daar zie je zelfs de hoogte verschillen van stoepranden nog terug, of in de bossen onder de bomen de paden, https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=649579#p649579) Die weer overeenkomen met de luchtfoto van de overheid.

Wat betreft gps meting, mijn metingen wijken ook altijd af, kan soms wel 10-25 meter zijn. Een track is dan ook een indicatie.

Wegen terug draaien ;-)
succes,

Allroads.
Allroads (2018-11-05 20:14:51+00:00): forest heb je gelijk. dat lag al zo,......wat niet goed is!

Sportlaan, had ik goed gelegd.
https://postimg.cc/v48yhV25 deze situatie is wel correct, ben er een maand geleden nog geweest, de situatie daar is niet rond. (rotonde is geen rotonde)

Wegen terug draaien ;-)
Succes.
Allroads.

Zie ook mail.
fkv (2020-10-29 05:31:23+00:00): Zumindest bei Way 137724419 hast du dich vertan, da muss ich die Tags wieder rauslöschen. Pass in Zukunft auf, dass du die richtigen Flächen erwischst.
thetornado76 (2020-10-29 16:06:00+00:00): Ok danke für die Korrektur
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Enock4seth (2024-03-14 07:47:45+00:00): This is old but I have seen multiple of these kinds of mapping from Apple team that have spitted roads that are not physically separated across Ghana (some of which of I have local knowledge about, I have removed), likely in other parts of the world. 

Can someone please clarify the reason for this?
LemonEarlMapper (2024-03-15 18:51:57+00:00): Hello, I saw that you commented on my colleague jula_june’s changeset. They are no longer active so I will be handling this on their behalf. It looks like this highway section was split into a dual carriageway due to the painted barrier which can be seen in Esri World Imagery (Clarity). The painted barrier can be seen in Mapillary as well (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=7.073766616944383&lng=-1.7142700216667208&z=15.669190280404258&pKey=796666707648313&focus=photo). I do think that this highway stretch would be better modeled as a bidirectional highway. The OSM Wiki page for dual carriageways (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway) makes it clear that separation by paint is not a valid reason to create a dual carriageway. If you agree with that change, I can go ahead and make the edit. Looking forward to hearing from you!
Enock4seth (2024-03-15 21:08:09+00:00): Thanks for your comment, I will start to revert/delete them. Kindly advice your mappers to avoid these types of contributions.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:11:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
jcarlson (2025-02-25 14:07:01+00:00): i know this was a minute ago, but it looks like this name change was a mistake
mavl (2018-12-25 00:33:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:42:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
abakus_uploader (2018-10-26 22:30:46+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2019-07-21 11:31:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:31:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
nevw (2018-10-26 08:55:49+00:00): Hi
you need to add your business listing details to the office or building you operate from instead of adding to the Brisbane City Hall or other mapped item unrelated directly to your business.
I suggest you draw the outline of the building where your business operates from - if it is a house or unit add the address details to that and include the tag office=company, contact details, etc.  
Help is here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
nevw (2018-10-26 09:01:50+00:00): I have reverted your edit, so feel free to begin again by mapping your business details to a real physical site you operate from.
b-jazz (2018-11-03 21:45:34+00:00): If this is an ongoing process, you might want to consider adding a self-intersection check to the ways that are being drawn. I've noticed a couple of examples where the line crossed back over itself, which triggers various validation checks. If you load your change files into JOSM, one of the validation checks that is run before upload is a check for that error.
b-jazz (2018-11-03 21:46:22+00:00): BTW, the way in question is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638134323
b-jazz (2018-11-03 21:50:11+00:00): Another: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638755828
Cascafico (2021-04-30 14:05:10+00:00): Ciao. E' ancora chiuso questo ponte?