piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chillly (2015-11-05 18:13:53+00:00): Similarly to your last edit, the name tag is not the best way to tag this. To add a memorial use historic=memorial. To make it more descriptive add memorial=war. You can add these tags in the online editor using the All tags section at the bottom of the lefthand pane.
chillly (2015-11-05 18:14:05+00:00): More here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial
trigpoint (2015-11-05 18:50:52+00:00): There is a wayside cross mapped, is that the war memorial http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/425429634
GerdP (2015-11-12 19:37:56+00:00): please review:
what is meant with natural=trs?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378491664
Maybe tree_row?
Roman Guy (2015-11-12 19:59:21+00:00): Correct, it's "tree row"...
Ins't true ?
Roman Guy (2015-11-12 20:01:17+00:00): I've see,.. and corrected my mistake.
GerdP (2015-11-12 20:02:42+00:00): ok, thanks
maraf24 (2015-11-05 20:24:51+00:00): To gdzie ten adres, którego źródło podałeś  ;)
Robin007 (2015-11-06 13:53:40+00:00): Jak klikniemy na "całą budowę".
W polu source:addr jest to, o czym pisałem :)
Tak jest OK. Wg. Wiki tak :)
maraf24 (2015-11-06 14:25:57+00:00): Chodzi o tę budowę? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378489940
Tutaj nie ma podanego adresu, więc nie powinno być source:addr. Może być samo source.
Robin007 (2015-11-06 15:06:31+00:00): Tak, dokładnie o to chodzi.
Poprawiłem, czy teraz jest OK?
maraf24 (2015-11-06 15:31:07+00:00): Tak.
mapper999 (2015-11-06 01:02:03+00:00): healthcare:speciality:de wäre wohl besser. Und hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2908995105) hast du wohl versehentlich den healthcare:speciality tag gelöscht.
morray (2015-11-06 18:53:30+00:00): Servus, stimmt der eine Tag ist irgendwie hops gegangen. sorry. Zum description vs. speciality. Ich finde description logischer, aber du hast natürlich recht, dass speciality:de noch häufiger genutzt wird. Feel free to retag ;)
mapper999 (2015-11-07 01:33:33+00:00): Ich verstehe das so, dass das healthcare:speciality:de die deutsche Bezeichnung von healthcare:speciality enthält. Eine Dokumentation dazu habe ich aber noch nicht gefunden.
morray (2015-11-07 07:09:30+00:00): Ich verstehe das ebenso. Und laut taginfo haben auch nur 3 User das description Tag benutzt. Und einer davon wäre ich. Daher schlage ich vor umtaggen und das andere dokumentieren. Wird ohnehin 100 mal häufiger benutzt
rickmastfan67 (2015-11-06 08:39:57+00:00): Just so you know, the turn restrictions weren't necessary.  All that needed to be done was add 'access=no' tags to the old bridge.  That would have easily done the job. ;)
gassc (2015-11-06 14:43:25+00:00): Thanks for the pointer!
vibrog (2016-05-10 08:19:23+00:00): Her har du brutt en relasjon for turvei E6
andrewpmk (2015-11-05 18:44:27+00:00): http://www.407eastphase1.ca/wp-content/gallery/segment-b-1/pic3-structure_b1_corrected.jpg is a copyrighted source, so unfortunately you cannot use this in OSM. This edit has been reverted.
Sebastien April (2015-11-06 01:24:06+00:00): So why you didn't just removed the reference? Anyway, those came from official public plans. Reverting everything is going way overboard.
andrewpmk (2015-11-06 01:31:33+00:00): You can't copy from that website without specifically being given permission.

The outline of Highway 407 East and Highway 412 is based on Landsat images I believe. It is very rough but it is all we have until the highway opens. It is supposed to open at the end of the year.
tyr_asd (2017-09-04 08:26:12+00:00): Wieso hast du hier denn den "name" des Brennerpass einsprachig gemacht?
luschi (2017-09-04 16:05:39+00:00): Ups...
Hab den Name wieder korrigiert
EugenyN (2015-11-08 09:32:33+00:00): статус в name не пишем
Strannik-W (2015-11-08 22:03:26+00:00): Что именно требуется написать? На что  исправить?
EugenyN (2015-11-09 07:14:57+00:00): вообще убрать name. тут подробнее http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
Strannik-W (2015-11-09 21:57:40+00:00): Подправил теги, убрал название.
EugenyN (2015-11-10 09:32:37+00:00): ок. отлично.
EugenyN (2015-11-08 09:31:57+00:00): статус объекта ("колонка", "магазин", "лес") в name не пишем. только название если есть.
Strannik-W (2015-11-08 22:01:24+00:00): Ну так это название объекта. Как его по другому можно назвать, чтобы людям было понятно? А по иконке трудно определить что именно там находится. Как именно исправить?
EugenyN (2015-11-09 07:10:52+00:00): убрать name вообще. такие правила именования: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
EugenyN (2015-11-09 07:11:36+00:00): кстати у нас есть Воронежский раздел на форуме. заходите, там помогут. ответят на вопросы, если будут: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=8324&p=25
Strannik-W (2015-11-09 21:52:37+00:00): Исправил. Правила прочитал. За ссылку на форум спасибо.
smaprs (2015-11-06 00:23:04+00:00): Diferenciar letras, como falado anteriormente: "Maiúsculas" / "minúsculas".
dolphinling (2015-11-06 19:53:21+00:00): I don't understand this change. That looks like a residential_link to me. You're doing this all over the world? Did you discuss anywhere first?
dolphinling (2015-11-06 20:52:38+00:00): I investigated a bit more. Some of the cleanups you're doing are great, but others (like this one) are not. You really should be discussing these kinds of changes in advance, to avoid removing the work that other people have done. I've posted to the mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-November/074913.html to follow up in a place with a wider variety of opinions.
GerdP (2015-11-08 17:16:18+00:00): sorry for the late reaction, I was offline for a while. Before I started changing the ways with the highway=residential_link I searched for any hint when it should be used and only 
found a discussion in a german forum which came to the conclusion that minor roads don't have link roads. I am not sure if my translation is 100% correct, but also OSM Inspector and the renderer of http://www.openstreetmap.org don't seem to "like" this tag.
I just read the posts in the list and found no comment which says that my change is wrong, but of course I can revert it if you want me to do that.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-08 17:35:05+00:00): Relevant issue for OSM carto is https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1280 .  I'd suggest that an on-the-ground mapper would need to choose what to use instead though.
smaprs (2015-11-06 00:22:09+00:00): Já existe ao lado. E nomeada corretamente. Não duplicar.
maraf24 (2015-11-05 23:36:02+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3819444234
ten węzeł z adresem jest zbędny, bo budynek już ma nadany adres:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/181146885
Dodatkowo twój adres jest niepełny-brakuje miejscowości.
Miłosz (2015-11-09 18:20:00+00:00): to jak zmienić hurtowo kod pocztowy dla m. Wędrzyn bo kod powienie być 69-211 a nie 69-200, to osiedle wojskowe ma swoją pocztę.
maraf24 (2015-11-09 18:30:09+00:00): Nie da się tego zrobić w edytorze, którego używasz.
Miłosz (2015-11-09 18:35:58+00:00): to proszę o zmianę. dla potwierdzenia link jednej z instytucji wojskowej w wędrzynie :) http://zw.wp.mil.pl/pl/95.html na dole jest wydzial ŻW i adres.
maraf24 (2015-11-09 19:00:03+00:00): Poczta Polska na http://kody.poczta-polska.pl/index.php twierdzi, że powinno być 69-200
maraf24 (2015-11-09 19:10:07+00:00): Tak samo gmina: http://sulecin.e-mapa.net?x=240639&y=516020&zoom=12&group=2,3,5&service=3,4,5,20,21,6,10,11,23,24,25,26,27,28,30,31,32,33&alllayers=4,5,20,21,6,7,9,10,23,24,25,26,27,29,30,31,32,33,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,47,48,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58&layer=3,28001
Miłosz (2015-11-09 19:13:02+00:00): ale nikt z mieszkancow ani instytucji nie podaje takiego kodu 69-200, wiec np kurier  zawsze od zamawiajacego dostaje adres 69-211. zreszta wiecej instytucji korzysta z tego adresu:
http://www.spwedrzyn.szkolnastrona.pl/
http://45wog.wp.mil.pl/pl/7.html
potwierdzenie z bip
https://www.bip.gov.pl/subjects/35418,45+Wojskowy+Oddzia%C5%82+Gospodarczy.html
izba przyjec
http://szukaj.sluzbazdrowia.pl/Ambulatorium-z-izba-chorych/Wedrzyn/Ul-wedrzyn/j26313.html
nawet koło łowieckie
http://www.wklszop.pl/index.php/kontakt
maraf24 (2015-11-09 22:06:37+00:00): Oba kody działają, bo są obsługiwane przez ten sam urząd pocztowy. Ten 69-211 to jest kod tego urzędu w Wędrzynie-tj. ta instytucja posiada oddzielny kod tylko dla siebie.  Zapewne miało to być pomocne przy sortowaniu poczty.
Możliwe, że nie ma to tutaj praktycznego znaczenia ze względu na wielkość miejscowości i dlatego nikomu się nie chciało skorygować błędu.
smaprs (2015-11-06 00:01:36+00:00): Não é neste local. Já existe em http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243336324. E não deve duplicar a informação que já há ali.
smaprs (2015-11-06 00:17:07+00:00): Diferenciar palavras que inciam com "Maiúscula". // O local não é este.
frosm (2019-08-22 14:44:46+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378506128
si vous avez raté l'information lors de votre inscription, il est absolument interdit de copier la quasi totalité des cartes dont google maps à cause de problème de licence et copyright
Nakaner (2015-11-05 23:48:32+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz wurde revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35115018

OSM ist kein Spielplatz. Bitte trage keinen Quatsch ein.
smaprs (2015-11-06 00:23:59+00:00): "Baurú Country" ?
smaprs (2015-11-06 00:21:00+00:00): Por que você está duplicando os elementos que já existem no mapa? E com nome errado? E colocando por cima do que já existe? (Ver "Praça Garibaldi" )
smaprs (2015-11-06 00:07:26+00:00): Neste local já não existe uma" Escola Estadual Professor Olintho de Oliveira" (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230014410)? Sua informação está correta? Verifique.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-21 20:53:09+00:00): Please, before making changes like this do try and understand why they have been made.  If you looked at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22777541/history you would have been seen that that key was not an error, and had been applied deliberately (and I'd already changed it back following a previous armchair change).

The reason is straightforward - both ways concerned have been surveyed by me, and are best considered as unclassified roads due to their role in the local road network (Lyth Hill Road is in addition designated as a "Quiet Lane").  Some armchair mappers have a tendency to change unclassified to roads to tertiary (and vice versa) to make the map "look nice" - entirely unrelated to the role those roads play in the local network.  Having a "source:highway=unclassified" tag set to "survey" makes it clear that when surveyed, it was unclassified.  Changing that tag to "source:highway" does not make that clear - after the armchair change it looks like the road has been surveyed as tertiary.

If you see tags like this that you don't understand I'd always suggest that you contact the original mapper.  In this case I'd have been more than happy to explain exactly why they are there.
smaprs (2015-11-06 00:10:22+00:00): Porque você está duplicando os elementos que já existem no mapa? E com nome errado?  
-  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378533406/history
-http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213574152/history
PlaneMad (2015-11-06 11:08:12+00:00): Habib, thank you for contributing to OSM. Can you explain why you changed the name of Riyadh to persian Gulf in Arabic? 

I'm reverting your change, please don't add wrong information to the map.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-08 02:02:13+00:00): It looks like you misunderstood what's happened here.  The story's on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34676257 , so I've changed it to building=telephone_box in line with that.  No idea what's in this one though.
jlcod (2015-11-05 20:50:05+00:00): Hallo und Willkommen bei OSM!
Bei deinen Änderungen ist etwas schief gelaufen, du hast ganz Mingolsheim in ein Haus verwandelt. Habe es gerade behoben, aber beim nächsten Mal etwas besser aufpassen :)
Außerdem noch ein paar Hinweise:
Im Normalfall gibt es bei Gebäuden (Außer an Eingängen oder Durchfahrten, etc.) keinen gemeinsamen Punkt mit Wegen. 
Im Editor iD gibt es eine Funktion zum Rechteckigmachen von Linien, ist sehr hilfreich bei Gebäuden.
Wünsche weiterhin Viel Spaß und Erfolg!
anderfo (2016-09-27 08:25:37+00:00): Hei, 
ser du satte bicycle=no på en sti opp til Kniben/Kaldvellkniben. 
Er det virkelig forbudt å sykle der, eller har du misforstått taggen?
Access-tagger som bicycle, horse og foot blir dessverre ofte misforstått og brukt som "anbefaling" for disse framkomstmidlene, men taggene skal kun brukes for å fortelle om det er lov eller forbudt å gå/sykle/ri/osv.
Hvis du ønsker å fortelle om det er egnet med sykkel her, må du istedet bruke class:bicycle eller class:bicycle:mtb (men da bør du først lese deg opp på hvordan de brukes). 
Forøvrig gå det an å ta en titt her: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Mountain_biking

Anders
naoliv (2015-11-06 01:02:08+00:00): jsouza, você está duplicando informações que já existem no mapa. Existe alguma dúvida ou dificuldade com as edições?
Por favor, responda esta mensagem ou a outra que foi enviada diretamente pra você.
GerdP (2015-11-06 07:21:53+00:00): please review:
some ways have the invalid tag
highway=primary;residential
now.
GerdP (2015-11-10 20:02:32+00:00): por favor contactar
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-co
para ayudar
user_5359 (2015-11-06 18:35:50+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Danke für die Ergänzung des OSM-Datenbestandes. Ich glaube aber kaum, dass die Firme wirklich "Seminar- und Meetingraum zur Miete" heißt, zumal die angegebene Webseite einen ganz anderen Hintergrund hat. Könntest Du das bitte nachbessern?

MfG     Georg V. (OSM=user_5359)
kabewe (2015-11-07 15:57:56+00:00): Hallo Georg, die Firma heisst Kulturklüngel und das ist unser Büro. Das Büro ist aber nicht öffentlich. Was ich aber öffentlich markieren will,  ist ein barrierefreier Meetingraum, den wir an Externe vermieten. Ich dachte, dass könne interessant sein, wenn man danach sucht da barrierefreie Meetingräume sonst oft nur in teueren Hotels zu bekommen sind. 

Vielen Dank und ein schönes Wochenende, Kerstin
Stereo (2015-11-06 15:45:16+00:00): I think you accidentally deleted a part of Grand-Rue while moving the stray node. I've fixed it for you. Happy mapping!
sspan (2015-11-06 19:59:35+00:00): Thanks, haven't edited anything in a long time.
5m4u9 (2015-11-11 04:59:35+00:00): Por favor, no editar consecutivamente el mismo nodo tantas veces probando la mjor categoría. Leer la documentación o preguntar en la lista. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

Ahora esta corregido a lo que ustedes son, una oficina de telecomunicaciones (office=telecommunication) o simplemente una empresa (office=company)... no aplica otras que cambiaron.
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-11-11 13:50:02+00:00): Hi, "nat_ref" is not supposed to completely replace "ref", if that is the default (national) ref on the maps.
JayCBR (2015-11-14 12:02:14+00:00): ref can be used for road with consistent numbering, like most motorways..
if a road doesnt have any signs showing its number, but does have an official number then we tag it with nat_ref
JayCBR (2015-11-14 12:03:47+00:00): also there are roads like Chalastra - Evzonoi where the official number is ΕΟ1α, but EO1 is used..
so nat_ref=EO1α, ref=EO1
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-11-17 11:24:48+00:00): Hi, I should clarify that if the actual ref is different, then that is fine: however, if the "nat_ref" is the only value, then "ref" should also be that since "nat_ref" is not supposed to completely replace "ref". :-)
tyr_asd (2015-12-06 13:12:40+00:00): There are a couple of ways that appear to have been uploaded by mistake (for example 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378574330), right?

See http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/478677
Nakaner (2015-11-07 12:01:58+00:00): Warum kürzst du "Zimmern (b Grünsfeld)" ab und schreibst es nicht "Zimmern (bei Grünsfeld)"? Wir schreiben bei OSM Namen doch aus, oder?

Bist du dir sicher, dass in Geroldshausen alle Weichen entfernt worden sind? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/250055463/history Es ist zwar eine paar Wochen her (14. August 2015), dass ich dort durchgefahren bin, aber ich kann mir das derzeit noch nicht vorstellen. Hast du dich vielleicht geirrt? (Es passt nämlich auch nicht zu den restlichen dort vorhandenen OSM-Daten.
bigbug21 (2015-11-07 12:10:13+00:00): Hallo Nakaner,
"Zimmern (b Grünsfeld)" müsste die offizielle Betriebsstellenbezeichnung sein. Bei Geroldshausen hatte ich gestern die möglichen verbliebenen Weichen nicht gesehen. Lässt sich über das nun recht umfassend veröffentlichte Betriebsstellenverzeichnis herausbekommen, ob das noch Bahnhof oder schon Haltepunkt ist?
Viele Grüße
Peter
Nakaner (2015-11-07 12:21:35+00:00): Wenn die Weichen weg sein "sollen", gibt es drei Möglichkeiten:

1. Der Bahnhof wurde zu einer Überleitstelle zurückgebaut. Dann wäre noch eine gewisse Anzahl an Signalen vorhanden.
2. Man hat vielleicht nur die nicht durchgehenden Hauptgleise und die Nebengleise abgebaut/abgetrennt und es bleibt ein Bahnhof ähnlich Walheim (Württ) oder Neckarzimmern übrig? Dann blieben die Signale und der Fdl (überwacht zwei Vollabschluss-Bü) dort.
3. Es ist wirklich nur noch ein Hp.

Hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3359375425 wissentlich gesehen oder einfach nur die Tags ergänzt?
bigbug21 (2015-11-07 12:27:44+00:00): Zu 3.: Das Signal entspricht meinen Aufzeichnungen, die aber natürlich auch fehlerhaft sein können.
Nakaner (2015-11-07 12:32:43+00:00): Kommst du auf absehbare Zeit dort wieder vorbei, um noch einmal durch das Fenster des RE nach draußen zu sehen? Oder legen wir lieber eine OSM-Note an (ggf. DSO befragen)?
bigbug21 (2015-11-07 12:39:10+00:00): Keine Ahnung, ob ich demnächst mal wieder da durchkomme. Ein FIXME würde es IMHO auch tun.
Nakaner (2015-11-07 22:44:58+00:00): Ich habe mal einen Note angelegt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/464519

Fixmes sind für mich so wie erweiterte Quellenangaben, ich verwende sie für Kleinigkeiten (ähnlich wie du), aber nicht für einen ganzen Bahnhof.
alphensebezorger (2016-03-14 21:01:27+00:00): Hallo fredrik66, ik ontdekte net op openstreetmap een straat met als straatnaam "Stuyvesanthof 29" in Leiden. Die 29 hoort vast niet bij de straatnaam lijkt me. Als ik me niet vergis heb jij dit aangepast. Ook heb je de straat iets verlegd, en op de Kooilaan een huisnummer veranderd, zodat er nu twee nummers 25 in de straat bestaan. Kan ik dit allemaal ongedaan maken, of is de kaart zo verbeterd volgens jou?
maraf24 (2015-11-07 10:41:47+00:00): This is not correct.
naoliv (2015-11-06 01:30:58+00:00): Muito bom!
bpb202 (2015-11-06 01:06:52+00:00): Incorrect Edit Description Above.
Edits reflect point additions (restaurant, bar, coffee shop, convenience store, florist)
Владимир К (2015-11-10 08:34:05+00:00): Крайне неаккуратная правка. Зачем надо было здание включать в границы районов и в маршруты общественного транспорта?
LWK (2016-02-02 23:37:11+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-07 13:19:25+00:00): Hello, what does "Fix places (nadoloni)" in the changeset comment mean?
sctrojan79 (2015-11-29 01:23:13+00:00): Looks like relation #5408981 got some extra "to" ways added when Bellevue Way NE was split up in this changeset.
bryceco (2015-11-29 04:08:07+00:00): Thanks! Also remnants of a previously fixed bug. Did you find this using KeepRight or something else?
sctrojan79 (2015-11-29 21:09:55+00:00): I found it via KeepRight.  It was flagged by the "restrictions" (purple/black) check.
Gabriela Carro (2015-11-06 03:16:26+00:00): Escuela 122, "Juan Bautista Alberdi.
Ciudad de Trelew, provincia de Chubut.
Alex3271 (2015-11-06 11:46:16+00:00): Dear zool,

Thank you very much for reverting!

Unfortunately, the revert does not include all fictional edits of Γιάννης 4, but only his last edit of each way.

Here is an example of one of his fictional motorways which is still there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377825899/history

Here is another example (Proti is surely not a city with over 100,000 inhabitants!):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/299014674/history
In this case, changes have been made more than five days ago and he even commented them! (He wrote: "Proti is a city, and not a village.", which is surely not true!)

Please, revert all changes of this user. Thank you!

Best regards,
Alex3271
Alex3271 (2015-11-06 11:50:01+00:00): Here's another unreverted change (six days ago!):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377758898/history
Alex3271 (2015-11-06 11:53:59+00:00): Please note that this is not the first time this user makes such edits.

Furthermore, he has three accounts and has been warned more than once:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%CE%93%CE%B9%CE%AC%CE%BD%CE%BD%CE%B7%CF%82%204

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%CE%93%CE%B9%CE%AC%CE%BD%CE%BD%CE%B7%CF%82%201

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/giannhs626
zool (2015-11-07 10:21:29+00:00): dear Alex3271, thank you for bringing all this to the attention of the DWG. We are considering a mass revert of the changes under discussion but I want to take a little time to assess their impact properly first, which will involve spending a bit of time with achavi - https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/ 

I hope and aim to be able to wrap this up by the end of the weekend. Please bear in mind that, as with everyone in OSM, the DWG are volunteers too :)
aitolos (2015-11-09 17:15:44+00:00): Dear zool, we are all volunteers, but we don't have the tools that the DWG has. :-)

I reverted about 200 changesetsof this user in the past, one by one (JOSM)
My first message to DWG goes back to April or may about the 3 accounts that Alex says.
But I have no more free time to follow him.
zool (2015-11-09 17:51:50+00:00): dear aitolos, Alex3271,

As of yesterday afternoon, when I saw Γιάννης 4 had started editing again, I did a mass revert of changes from that account and also Γιάννης 1; I didn't touch the third account that you mentioned as it has been inactive for a 5 months and, as you suggest, the hard work of unpicking has already been done by hand :/

I applied the longest block I can with my privileges and am consulting on how to extend the block, and I'll keep a close eye on the three accounts for a while longer.

The tools I used to do the mass revert are all available on github for anyone to use, though the interfaces are raw, so caveat editor. https://github.com/woodpeck/osm-revert-scripts

I hope this is enough for now?

x Jo aka zool
aitolos (2015-11-09 20:05:29+00:00): Thanks for the link :-)
I thought that was "private" tools.

Yannis
SomeoneElse (2015-11-06 12:17:03+00:00): Thanks for this!
bhousel (2015-11-06 15:35:31+00:00): This is how I do my penance for iD walkthrough bugs. :-)
GOwin (2015-11-06 06:28:46+00:00): Ruth, please refrain from using Google StreetView . Google-derived data, except for limited instances (i.e. crisis mapping) are not considered acceptable sources for OpenStreetMap because of data licensing incompatibilities.

For your reference: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/710/can-i-use-google-streetview-to-help-create-maps
mapper999 (2015-11-07 01:55:21+00:00): Hast du die Daten der FFW mit den bereits vorhandenen OSM-Daten abgeglichen oder sind jetzt möglicherweise Hydranten doppelt in der Datenbank? Ich hatte nämlich bereits den ein oder anderen Hydranten in Neulußheim eingetragen.
Supaplex (2015-11-06 10:28:59+00:00): 這是開放的平臺，不大適合私人住家等非公眾性資訊
jlcod (2015-11-07 01:24:10+00:00): Hallo, habe versucht die Tags zu korrigieren, da das Gebäude nicht mehr zu sehen war. Ich hoffe mit meinem Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35141076 ist erreicht was gewünscht war?
mcdlee (2015-11-06 08:17:15+00:00): Good job!
Berobispo (2015-11-07 16:41:51+00:00): in english: deleted way, was marked as footpath/trail. No such thing, was an unmarked way. In some places, crouching under bushes necessary to advance, impossible at night or with children.
keithonearth (2015-11-06 09:10:49+00:00): I don't know if anyone reads the notes here, but my edit summary was wrong, as I forgot to update it after my previous summary. 

This time I was, in fact, adding farmland and wooded areas.
PlaneMad (2015-11-06 13:56:47+00:00): Wow, Leh looks amazing! Thanks for all the mapping! :D