piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2021-02-15 12:24:58+00:00): Hallo Hunt4Target, 
ich habe - wie gewünscht - beim Turm das Merkmal
building=yes
abgeändert in
building:part=yes.
Das war alles.

Außerdem habe ich den Gebäudeumriß der Basilika und des Klosters anhand Maps4BW angepaßt. Maps4BW ist eine amtliche Karte, in der Gebäude lagegenau und mit dem EG-Grundriß eingezeichnet sind und von der wir legal abzeichnen dürfen. Maps4BW kann im Editor ID als Hintergrund eingeblendet werden (Symbol Bildmaterial-Einstellungen am rechten Bildschrimrand oder Tastenkürzel "B")
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW

Beim Hochladen meiner Änderungen hat der JOSM-Datenprüfer mich darauf hingewiesen, daß dieser Gebäudeteil
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222027350/history
u.a. mit den Merkmalen
tourism=museum + museum=history
versehen ist und innerhalb dieses Gebäudeteiles auch noch dieser Knoten (von Dir)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1380341486/history
mit dem Merkmal
tourism=museum
vorhanden ist.
Das wäre dann ein Museum innerhalb eines Museums, was wohl nicht sein wird.
Ist der ganze Gebäudeteil ein Museum oder ist nur ein Teil davon ein Museum, dort wo Du den Knoten eingetragen hast?

Fragende Grüße
Hunt4Target (2021-02-16 11:03:21+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe den Eintrag wieder korrigiert, d.h. der gesamte Nord-Flügel ist wieder ein Gebäude, in dem ein Museum integriert ist.
andi9876 (2021-02-09 01:11:17+00:00): school listed already.
deleted
Taksine (2024-09-04 04:29:33+00:00): 没必要这么改，中国的习惯是加村字，尤其是这个村
katpatuka (2024-09-04 05:28:16+00:00): ok ;)
eggie (2021-02-05 15:57:37+00:00): Beste sebas.. Tag svp bij op de bestaande adresnode. Geen bedrifs en adresinfo op gebouwomtrekken zetten.
MVG
eggie
sebascw (2021-02-06 08:48:26+00:00): Hoi Eggie, wat bedoel je met 'tag'?
Ik heb de naam Prologis, die in het gebouw stond vervangen door de bedrijfsnaam die er nu zit. Het adres heb ik inmiddels uit de gebouw node verwijderd. Bedoel je het zo?
^Sebas
eggie (2021-02-06 08:59:10+00:00): Dag Sebas.. Dat is in ieder geval beter... adressen zijn immers uniek en zijn al aanwezig middels de adresnodes.
Eigenlijk is de afspraak om bedrijven bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode. Beetje lastig als er zoveel adresnodes zijn.
Zou het dus maar even zo laten. De voorgaande mapper heeft hier overal de bedrijfsnaam op de 'buildingshapes' gezet.
De logica om het niet te doen is dat de bedrijfsnaam niet de naam van het gebouw hoeft te zijn. Ook voor de vindbaarheid is het beter om de adresnodes te gebruiken. 
Kerken, paleizen e.d. hebben vaak wel een naam op het gebouw. 
MVG
eggie
alexashh (2021-02-05 14:15:58+00:00): http://codd-nnov.ru/v-nizhnem-novgorode-vremenno-zapreshhen-povorot-na-prospekt-gagarina/
osmviborg (2021-02-05 14:46:20+00:00): Hej. Jeg har rettet din opdatering. D har været lidt udfordret med bla. flere forskellige områder. Husk ikke at tilføje adresse oplysninger på bygninger.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-02-07 01:16:53+00:00): Hi, alignment on all of these building imports are incorrect. Please use DCS NSW Imagery for NSW alignment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98773778
DaveF (2021-02-06 04:28:53+00:00): Hi
All National Railway railway stations are mapped. Please don't duplicate them in train station buildings. Tag the buildings as building=train_station.
Ted Pottage (2021-05-27 22:37:49+00:00): Hi
The removal of point nodes for businesses such as Holmesdale Garage https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/324815549 has consequences for pages that depend on the data, In this case Wheelmap 
https://wheelmap.org/nodes/324815549 - Not step-free to reception desk.
Your replacement https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904159962 will have to be re-tagged by a wheelmapper. How many other examples of accessibility mapping have been vandalised here or in other change sets? I have already discovered two by inspection within 200m
DaveF (2021-05-28 11:51:35+00:00): I've absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Have you replied to the correct changeset?
DaveF (2021-05-28 11:52:49+00:00): Apologies Ted. It's me who incorrectly replied. I'm an idiot.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 19:00:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 19:00:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
Mxdanger (2021-02-05 21:45:15+00:00): Please separate changesets that span multiple countries.
Something B (2021-02-05 21:48:13+00:00): OK.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-05 22:43:10+00:00): Also, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct (this seems to be reviewing each element, but you should be aware about this rules)
Something B (2021-02-05 22:47:38+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny
I go through every item. Typos are evident in this change.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 19:00:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:55:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:55:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
user_5359 (2021-02-08 18:55:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:06:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
user_5359 (2021-02-08 19:01:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:06:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:06:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
Polarbear-repair (2021-02-05 19:02:20+00:00): Dear user, 
thanks for your interest in OpenStreetMap. Please consider the following:
- do not use the changeset comment for messages unrelated to your editing action. This is for describing your edit, only, in this case "adding a facility"
- specify what the object is that you are editing, e.g. is it an office with a callcentre, an outreach facility with direct contact to the clients (social_facility), etc.
- check that the node is in the correct location according to the address, and use the standardised address scheme with addr:* tagging.
user_5359 (2021-02-05 19:34:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Polarbear-repair (2021-02-06 12:39:36+00:00): Sorry @ user_5359 - your response is inappropriate. 
I have now verified the object, location corrected, tagging improved.
Business statements that were inappropriate to OSM were removed.
floscher (2021-02-08 15:30:45+00:00): And the user now deleted the object with appropriate OSM tags and replaced it with a new object that only has a name and description again … https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8404069021
user_5359 (2021-02-08 17:20:05+00:00): I have delete the node (see https://www.osm.org/changeset/98774925). @Polabear-repair> Sorry I must work with iD, Feel free to revert your verified node. I you need help, You are welcome!
Polarbear-repair (2021-02-08 19:37:25+00:00): @user_5359 - no worries. I added half the street's shops now from mapillary to proof the location, and restore the original node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98927511
@DRAD user, please read https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4745 before you continue. It explains again what you are welcome to do, and what not. 
As for location, there is strong evidence that it is where I put it. You can help verifying it by taking geo-referenced pictures and uploading it to open streetview platforms such as Mapillary.
SomeoneElse (2021-02-16 20:57:31+00:00): Hello,
This is you're 6th changeset, and here you're deleting information from OpenStreetMap.  Please don't do that.  We'll need to revert these changes, and once we've done that we'll unblock your account again.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2021-02-16 20:57:46+00:00): Merhaba,
Bu, 6. değişiklik kümesisiniz ve burada OpenStreetMap'ten bilgi siliyorsunuz. Lütfen bunu yapma. Bu değişiklikleri geri almamız gerekecek ve bunu yaptıktan sonra hesabınızın engelini yeniden kaldıracağız.
Saygılarımla,
Andy Townsend, OSM'nin Veri Çalışma Grubu adına.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-16 21:07:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99405481 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some significant information removal (either not understanding what OSM is or vandalism) near Azerbaijan.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98775049
ibanez (2021-02-05 16:51:26+00:00): Hi, willkommen bei Openstreetmap. Bitte besuche mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency=fire%20hydrant?uselang=de und überdenke die Verwendung der Hydrantennummer in name und ref und description. Ich denke ref=35 sollte reichen. Danke und beste Grüße.
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 02:16:46+00:00): Hi Printr. Your edit looks awesome, but I improve water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/904166795) due crossing with highway. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143786876). Thank you.
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 02:22:11+00:00): Hi Printr. Your edit looks awesome, but I improve water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/904166794) due crossing with highway. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143786867). Thank you.
Komadinovic Vanja (2021-02-06 21:52:08+00:00): Pozdrav,

Vezano za https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8381396347 prosao sam danas kroz Dolovo i mislim da se crkva nalazi na drugom mestu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8400755565 .Da li je ok da izbrišem vašu lokaciju crkve?
Janjko (2023-03-15 12:15:30+00:00): Konzulat Bjelorusije u benzinskoj postaji Adria Oila? Malko sumnjivo.
MarbleRock (2023-03-15 13:03:57+00:00): Dodao sam ga prema tražilici predstavništva u rh na mvep.hr
eggie (2021-02-05 15:45:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
ALu68 (2021-02-06 20:37:54+00:00): Hello xscvxc,

Please correect the name tag of these three highways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150294732
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/904173656
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150294737

Regards. Andre
mavl (2021-02-05 15:21:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 98359834, 98660118, 98660157, 98660173, 98660235, 98660263, 98660303, 98660324, 98660340, 98660362, 98660380, 98660393, 98660452, 98660463, 98660485, 98660496, 98660510, 98660526, 98660533, 98660568, 98660594, 98660608, 98660637, 98660650, 98660672, 98660679, 98660692, 98660708, 98660744, 98660760, 98660767, 98660792, 98660804, 98660839, 98660859, 98660872, 98660885, 98660902, 98660924, 98660940, 98660964, 98661008, 98708940, 98709041, 98709112, 98709136, 98709178, 98709225, 98709249, 98709287, 98719089, 98719155, 98719229, 98719277.
eggie (2021-02-05 15:48:16+00:00): yp Weet je het wel zeker, want vlak er naast loopt ook al een pad? 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-05 15:56:08+00:00): Jouw pad bestaat wel, maar ik twijfel of dat eerdere pad er wel loopt?
ypftrkns (2021-02-08 08:37:01+00:00): Dat klopt Eggie, dit betreft 2 padden die parallel aan elkaar lopen. Het linker pad (nieuw) wordt het meest gebruikt.
eggie (2021-02-08 08:59:45+00:00): Oke... duidelijk..
Mapse
Eggie
philippec (2021-02-06 10:37:53+00:00): Gooik aed.
Ik heb het professioneel aangevuld.
eggie (2021-02-05 16:30:55+00:00): Dag Lammie..
Volgens de BGT omtrekgericht is de straatnaam gewoon aan elkaar geschreven. Hoe staat het op het straatnaambord?
eggie (2021-02-05 16:36:48+00:00): Het beste kun je de PDOK actueel op de achtergrond zetten. Die ligt precies goed.
Bing ligt op veel plaatsen verschoven.
eggie (2021-02-05 16:42:55+00:00): Wanneer je zeker bent  van de straatnaam (Wat is je bron?) de 'fout' doorgeven aan https://verbeterdekaart.kadaster.nl/#?geometry.x=189471.17&geometry.y=343975.87&zoomlevel=12.26
Doe je dat zelf?

Gr eggie
Lammie49 (2021-02-05 17:35:34+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Jij hebt inderdaad  weer een dicrepantie gevonden.
Op het kaartje bij de gemeentegids is de straatnaam los van elkaar geschreven. (Karrebosser Veldweg)  En op de kadasterkaart aan elkaar vast!
Op Google Streetview is geen bordje te zien aan het begin van dit weggetje.
Ik bel volgende week met de gemeente voor uitsluitsel.
Daarna geef ik het door aan het kadaster of ik corrigeer Openstreetmap.
Bedankt,  Lambert
eggie (2021-02-05 17:47:35+00:00): Oke top!
eggie (2021-02-05 18:02:05+00:00): en kijk even of je consequent de juiste spelling toepast.
veldweg en Veldweg staat verschillend hier. Hoofdletter en verderop kleine letter.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=98777359
eggie (2021-02-06 09:27:10+00:00): De naam Karrebosser Veldweg in ieder geval eenduidig gemaakt tot aan Pissummerweg.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-02-05 15:59:04+00:00): Top!
Genoeg te doen daar. 
In het park ontbreken ook nog alle paden.
Mapse,
eggie
woodpeck (2024-11-14 13:05:50+00:00): (fehlgeleiteten Kommentar des Benutzers ideewirwa entfernt)
Baloo Uriza (2021-02-28 00:31:34+00:00): This definitely is named.  There's apparently a local rule that requires private roads to be named and the owner happened to give this a very hilarious name.  I personally spotted this street on the ground.
arte2002 (2021-02-06 00:26:48+00:00): Hola, decirte que el promotor y el mantenimiento de la vía verde es de la Diputación de Alicante.
Y por la tanto el nombre es Oficial es Vía verde Agost-Maigmó y la web de información es 
http://www.diputacionalicante.es/publicaciones/guia-de-la-via-verde-agost-maigmo/

Deberías revertir los datos

saludos
jonashoffmann (2021-02-08 09:41:27+00:00): Hola, perdona, tienes razón. He cambiado el nombre otra vez y añadido "operator=Diputación de Alicante".
Estás de acuerdo con dejar el "website="de viasverdes.com? Me parece que hay más información ahi y también tiene el folleto de la diputación de Alicante. Podemos usar el web de la diputación en "website:operator=".
Saludos
arte2002 (2021-02-08 23:39:01+00:00): Sí, perfecto, solo un apunte el inicio de la ruta es la Estación de ferrocarril de Agost (creo que está en desuso). 

Saludos y buen mapeo.
jonashoffmann (2021-02-09 09:00:36+00:00): Vale, voy a corregir esto también. Gracias por los informaciones :)
Buen mapeo
Maxizouzoute (2021-02-11 08:46:48+00:00): Bonjour, l'appellation "réserve forestière" n'est plus en vigueur à Mayotte depuis 2012. Serait-il possible de modifier ? Il faudrait remplacer par "Forêt départementale de Sohoa"
Shaun das Schaf (2021-02-05 21:21:54+00:00): Hallo A Voss, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Ich nehme an, dass es sich bei dieser Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229219690
um einen gemeinsamen Fuß- und Radweg handelt oder?
Das "highway=path" an dieser Linie war in diesem Fall korrekt (anstatt "highway=cycleway").

Das ist leider ein Fehler im Webeditor, der immer noch nicht behoben wurde.
Der taggt nämlich sowohl Radwege, als auch gemeinsame Rad- und Fußwege immer mit "highway=cycleway".
Wie es richtig geht, ist hier beschrieben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Ich habe das mal für dich behoben.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=98791748

Wenn du Fragen hast, kannst du dich gerne melden.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
MapsInQuestion (2021-02-05 16:27:23+00:00): Atsiprašau jei kas blogai... Pradėjau naudotis JOSM, tai tik mokausi :)
bradrh (2021-02-07 00:14:22+00:00): Why did you remove the smoothness tag on way 98779809?
charl3s (2021-02-15 08:24:24+00:00): Ma być tunel pod torami?
AndyB_66 (2021-02-15 08:28:15+00:00): Tak, pisałem Ci o tym, cytując uchwałę KOPI:
"2.2. Przyjąć do wyceny przejście pod linią kolejową nr 30 w km 90+215,19 drogą ekspresową S19 obiektami tunelowymi
(prefabrykowanymi powłokowymi oddzielnymi dla obu jezdni), jednocześnie rezygnując z budowy obiektu 91+039-
WD w ciągu drogi gminnej 103375L."
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-05 17:05:17+00:00): Benu jau yra pažymėta.
dieterdreist (2021-02-10 23:20:52+00:00): Ciao Fede, ti vorrei chiedere di mettere dei commenti più lunghi e significativi per descrivere le modifiche che hai fatto. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

Un saluto,
Martin
Ted Pottage (2021-05-27 22:59:09+00:00): Hi
Don't remove point notes that include the tags wheelchair=yes/limited/no and wheelchair:description=[some access-4-ALL info]
These are used by wheelmap and wheelchair users.
Here you have removed a point note that is used by Wheelmap to show the accessibility of the WC within the Community Centre:  https://wheelmap.org/nodes/5519077450  
You have not transferred this accessibility information to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550012026/ and even if you had the images would no longer be linked and will disappear from Wheelmap.
katpatuka (2021-02-07 17:43:05+00:00): Please be very cautious when editing county and town boundaries: the relation for 阳江市 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3032037 has now gaps and isn't a closed way anymore - I'll try to fix it...
user_10714872 (2021-02-07 17:45:24+00:00): Thank you
abakus_uploader (2021-02-05 23:32:00+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
tux67 (2021-02-05 17:49:17+00:00): Hi,
das sieht auf den NRW Orthofotos aber deutlich nach tree_row aus und nicht nach Hecke?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98781541
Jlaba (2021-02-05 19:44:20+00:00): Ich fand den Abschnitt "Große Hecken sowie Feld- und Straßenbegrenzungen" mit (mittlerweile) viel unter und zwischen den Bäumen passend. Es ist kein Wald und ist auch keine Allee-artigen Baumreihe. Die Übergänge sind fließend. Es sieht danach aus, als ist und wird es eine Gewächs-Barriere, eben die o.g. "Hecke", die ja keine Vorgarten-Hecke sein muss.

Passt das Nebeneinander der Gebiete so? Da waren/sind viele ungetrennte Punkte Wohngebiet+Acker und die Straße lief irgendwie da drüber.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98781541
tux67 (2021-02-06 10:06:13+00:00): Ok, ich nehme mal an das sieht dann rundherum so aus wie her: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=UYKQeFggL5vHYaQdQOJ__A&focus=photo
Ich hätte mir auch noch natural=scrub und eine Tree_row vorstellen können, aber so ist es wahrscheinlich besser.
Das die Trennung von Flächen angeht: natural oder landuse miteinander verklebt ist ja ok. Nur Straßen, Gebäude, etc. sollten mit denen nicht verklebt werden.
Ich löse das dort wo ich etwas bearbeite aber auch nur nach Lust und Laune auf .. sonst wird man gaga und hat eigentlich keinen echten Mehrwert (außer die zukünftige Wartbarkeit).

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98781541
Jlaba (2021-02-06 13:09:36+00:00): Ja, das ist da. Eine markante Baumreihe ist es jedenfalls nicht.
Danke für die Erläuterung.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98781541
Hedaja (2021-02-12 09:04:11+00:00): Hi 
I tried to find something about whether we can use planet lab images or not.
In the wiki I could only find them under contributors listed as image providers for disaster relief. 
Do we have a general permission though?
Nothing listed under: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Aerial_imagery
Mannivu (2021-02-05 17:19:48+00:00): Ciao, scusa, perché ruin? Una parte dell'edificio e ancora esistente
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98781840
Micael Camozzi (2021-02-05 17:32:28+00:00): Ciao, questo articolo https://www.ecodibergamo.it/stories/Cronaca/85610_casa_del_fascio_a_caravaggio_il_demanio_la_mette_in_vendita/ afferma che "...considera le pessime condizioni in cui si trova lo stabile...".
Mannivu (2021-02-05 18:14:29+00:00): Sì, perché è inagibile. Ma è tutt'altro che in rovina, ci abito a pochi metri, lo so bene. In casi dubbi come questo (se non si è della zona) sarebbe meglio lasciare una nota piuttosto che modificare basandosi sull'articolo di un quotidiano.
ChehrehBargi (2023-05-22 15:17:00+00:00): سلام
اتصالی که در انتهای روستای کردکندی ایجاد کرده اید، بسته شده و دیگر وجود ندارد.
Jrachi (2021-02-06 17:48:37+00:00): Scusa.
Devi avere sbagliato qualcosa...
Il nome nelle relazioni "lwn VMe*" è assurdo!
Manuel H (2021-06-11 22:36:04+00:00): Hallo,
du hast den Weg, der vorher "Hessental" hieß, in "Grüner Stieg" umbenannt. Aus welcher Quelle stammt diese Information? Ich konnte dazu nichts finden.