piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
alester (2022-05-05 21:29:39+00:00): These roads are not contained in the StatsCan dataset. While some of these private driveways do appear to exist, they certainly aren't named "Public Lane". Interestingly, Google Maps does have a road incorrectly marked a bit to the north off of Nimmo Road as "Public Lane", so I suspect Google was used as a partial source for this.
jeslop (2022-05-03 14:28:19+00:00): Saludos de nuevo Toño Rivas. 

Aunque sigues sin comunicarte con el resto de usuarios, en este conjunto de cambios has utilizado imágenes (Bing) que están desfasadas. Las más actuales son las del PNOA (Plan Nacional de Ortofotografía Aérea), ahí podrás ver que el camino está asfaltado. Cuida también un poco el trazado de las vías, las geometrías las tienes desviadas en algunos casos.

Saludos y recuerda que OSM es una comunidad, no una tarea personal.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
alester (2022-05-05 21:25:48+00:00): This road does not have a name, neither in the StatsCan dataset nor on-the-ground.
Frans S (2022-05-03 14:41:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120468395
alester (2022-05-05 21:25:27+00:00): This road does not have a name, neither in the StatsCan dataset nor on-the-ground.
TheNet1996 (2022-07-27 21:14:08+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du denn hier foot=no getaggt? Vor Ort gibt es keine Verbotsschilder?!
Vg
Mike
koastoas (2022-07-28 09:45:23+00:00): Hallo Mike,
vor Ort gibts kein Verbotsschild. 
Ich werde es entfernen. Hab den Tag falsch verstanden.
MarcoR (2022-05-04 21:14:41+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o!
Se vuoi inserire le stelle di un hotel puoi usare la chiave stars; nel nome di solito si inserisce solo lo stretto necessario (senza abbreviazioni); consulta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:stars per maggiori informazioni.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
eggie (2022-05-02 18:00:33+00:00): Dag Hidde. Bij die parkeergelegenheden langs de weg zou je beter het als vlak kunnen intekenen. Dat is meer gebruikelijk. 
MVG eggie
eggie (2022-05-02 18:03:01+00:00): Op de Koffiedik komen fietspaden uit. Je hebt van een highway=path een wandelpad gemaakt highway=footway  Dus met een G7 bord .
Het zal nu allemaal niet meer voor fietsers routeren Is dat je bedoeling. Welk bord staat hier vooraan? Geen bord dan highway=path
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-02 18:06:11+00:00): Omdat het hier allemaal niet meer voor fietsers routeert heb ik het wandelpad weer omgezet naar highway=path. Mocht er een bord G7 zijn gekomen. Rond blauw met de wandelaar met kind.. laat het even weten. Dan zal ik mijn edits terugdraaien.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-02 18:11:11+00:00): Idem  De verbinding tussen de Asserstraat en Dingspil heb je omgezet naar wandelpad. Staat er een bord G7.. zoniet of dan highway=path 
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
HiddeV22 (2022-05-02 19:16:36+00:00): Aha, ik zal in het vervolg gewoon parkeervlakken gebruiken. Dit leek mij eerst ook beter, maar ik zag in de wijken waar ik parkeerplekken heb toegevoegd dat het op dezelfde manier was gedaan, dus daarom heb ik dat overgenomen en aangevuld.
Wat betreft de wandelpaden zal ik hier ook beter op letten de volgende keer. Ik was ervan uitgegaan dat een "path" alleen maar een onverharde weg kon zijn, en ik wist ook niet dat het pas een wandelpad is zodra er een G7 bord staat. 
Dan heb ik nog een andere vraag, als er nou een stoep tegen de weg aanzit (bijvoorbeeld bij de straat De Fledders in Vries, kijk maar op streetview ofzo) is het dan ook nodig om dit aan te geven als sidewalk of is dit overbodig?
eggie (2022-05-02 19:32:44+00:00): Dat laatste is geen consensus.
Wanneer je een aparte stoep intekent zal het niet goed routeren. Probeer de straat maar eens over te steken.
De meeste mappers taggen sidewalk=right of left .. ligt aan de richting van de weg.. in de tagging van de hoofdrojbaan.
Wanneer je een apart trottoir intekent zorg dan wel voor voldoende verbinding met andere wegen.
Er zijn dus twee stromingen..
Ik ben van de sidewalk = left of right of both of no..  😀
Het kan op beide manieren
eggie (2022-05-02 19:39:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
HiddeV22 (2022-05-02 19:50:47+00:00): Top, ik zal ernaar kijken.
itineris (2023-04-21 11:53:05+00:00): Szia!

Az épületekre a "Rákóczi Ferenc utca" címet csak az utca (vonal) alapján raktad fel, vagy valami más forrásod is volt? A vasútnál egy fa táblán a rövid "Rákóczi u." szerepel, a címjegyzékben pedig "Rákóczi út". Ez utóbbira javítanék mindenkit.

Üdv:
Ákos
bordaben (2023-04-21 18:18:21+00:00): Szia!

A meglevő utca alapján raktam fel a házszámokat, külön nem néztem utána, hogy melyik alak a helyes.

Üdv,
Bence
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:44:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
alester (2022-05-05 21:23:45+00:00): This road does not have a name, neither in the StatsCan dataset nor on-the-ground.
impiaaa (2022-05-03 14:24:07+00:00): The street name is incorrect. addr:street must match the name of a street nearby, and not include the number (which goes in addr:housenumber). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses Additionally, you need to use the changeset comment to describe what you changed; "update" is not enough. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
alester (2022-05-05 21:22:51+00:00): The StatsCan dataset does not contain a road by this name here, but Google Maps does, so I suspect that's where this data came from.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:44:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:45:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
Friendly_Ghost (2022-05-21 21:19:07+00:00): Please tag facebook links as contact:facebook=* rather than website=* (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:facebook for documentation)
yrtimiD (2022-05-10 19:38:47+00:00): Hello, please try to keep changeset areas relatively small. Preferably of one city size, and for sure not more than one country. It's totally ok to do several small commits (saves) instead of one world-wide like this one.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
eggie (2022-05-04 06:56:46+00:00): Dag mrk  Het lijkt me oke als je er inderdaad niet met tweewielers mag komen.
De tagging is van MTB-er Multimodaal die veel bezig is met access tagging. Hij heeft het aangepast naar de tagging van mapper Padvinder met conditionaltags. Je kunt het beste even overleggen met Multimodaal. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/multimodaal
Stuur hem gewoon een berichtje met de link naar deze changeset.
Dan weet je het zeker.

MVG
eggie
multimodaal (2022-05-09 22:17:39+00:00): Hoi mrk1, bedankt voor je PM. Dat fietsen is toegestaan heb ik gebaseerd op dit toegangsbord in het veld: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=817754575846489 Daarop staat geen fietsverbod , en het is goed denkbaar dat je daar kan fietsen zonder iets te beschadigen (wat niet geldt voor motoren of auto's). Dat fiestverbod kan er dus beter af (los van de vraag of jij en ik het een goed idee vinden om daar te fietsen, access gaat primair over de vraag of iets wel of niet verboden is). 
Achteraf had ik de link naar die foto beter kunnen toevoegen met de key : image:access_sign= , dan is weten andere mensen ook waarop het is gebaseerd. Haal jij het fietsverbod er weer af?
Thx & groeten!
multimodaal (2022-05-09 22:18:55+00:00): PS klompenpaden bevatten een grote verscheidenheid aan paden, die website benoemt de meest voorkomende variant, maar de bordjes / hekken / mededeling van de eigenaar in het veld zijn onder BW 5:22 uiteindelijk maatgevend
mrk1 (2022-05-10 07:10:05+00:00): Ik heb hem aangepast.
aceman444 (2022-05-06 22:00:43+00:00): Vyborne
rui228 (2025-06-15 18:17:33+00:00): A EM 511 no distrito de Viseu começa na EN 229 (Antas) e termina na EM 601 (proximidades de Prova).
O troço em referência, corresponde à ER 326
MxxCon (2022-05-03 04:20:03+00:00): Hello.
Sidewalks on this street are already mapped as separate paths, as such this tag should be "separate" rather than "both".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120471605
MxxCon (2022-05-03 04:29:51+00:00): Hello.
Satellite imagery shows there's a shared bike lane. Is that no longer the case?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120471627
user_5359 (2022-05-03 20:05:23+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir nochmal die Kirche an. Ich glaube kaum, dass Du den Gebäudewert in Fremdsprachen übersetzen wolltest. Oder was willst Du mit den Schlüssel building:ar uns sagen?
Bergischer (2022-05-04 07:26:54+00:00): Jo danke für den Hinweis, habe ich korrigiert.
eggie (2022-05-02 18:15:15+00:00): Hi HR  You may load the presets for cycleways into JOSM
Than you have the right tags for a G12a cycleway.
highway=cycleway
moped=designated
mofa=designated
traffic_sign=NL:G12a

https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-05-02 18:17:39+00:00): This one.. icon	​NL - Fiets 	Dick van den Hoven, Allroads, AdVerburg 	Preset for Netherlands bicycle use related tags, supplemented with mofa, moped tags. 	1.3.9
habitual_revers (2022-05-03 21:13:09+00:00): Thanks for the hint Eggie. Am incorporating the tags in my new changes.

I'll make a change set to update my older edits.
eggie (2022-05-04 06:15:15+00:00): Oke.. after setup you will find the presets in the menu Voorkeuzen (presets) under ' NL.fiets  '.
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-02 18:45:12+00:00): Laba diena. Labai gaila, bet teko atšaukti šį pakeitimą. Microsofto Bingo ortofoto yra labai prastos kokybės, jų negalima naudoti nepasireguliavus pagal realią situaciją ant žemės. Lietuvoje naudojame kokybiškus ORT10LT, kurie yra teisingai pririšti.
marczoutendijk (2022-05-03 18:54:28+00:00): Your only changeset comment seems to be: "edycja ogolna".
Can you improve on that to help your fellow OSM mappers?
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
=====
Wydaje się, że jedynym Twoim komentarzem do changeset jest: "edycja ogolna".
Czy możesz to poprawić, aby pomóc kolegom mapującym OSM?
Proszę przeczytać:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Zverik (2022-05-04 13:33:57+00:00): Hi, did you intend to add the price list to the Rail Baltica railway?
JuanjoMC (2022-05-03 08:43:20+00:00): Hi,

I see that you are adding foot=yes to several foot ways and sidewalks across Brussels.
You don't need to do that, foot ways are implicitly accessible to pedestrians.

Cheers
MxxCon (2022-05-03 04:49:32+00:00): Hello.
Servepro is company that cleans up after floods and fires? If so, why is it tagged as tinsmith?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120474413
Lejun (2022-05-04 12:19:23+00:00): Salut et bienvenue, les modifications sont propres. Je me suis juste permis deux corrections :

– building=garageS. Le S permet d’indiquer la présence d’un lot de garages plutôt qu’un garage individuel (ce qui semble être le cas au vue des dimensions mais je peux faire erreur) ;
– name > addr:housename. Chipotage de ma part, j’aime pas la clé name qui est sur-utilisée et permet pas forcément de comprendre les infos, Addr:housename est plus spécifique.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120541797
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:54+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:25:20+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:51+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:25:10+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
treestryder (2024-06-13 14:31:03+00:00): I was just there and captured some Mapillary imagery along Lakeshore Drive. That was definitely a multi-use path (cycleway means bicycle=designated).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Pedestrian_ways
emersonveenstra (2024-06-13 17:48:48+00:00): Yeah, that was probably me using the iD preset before i knew about the wiki
treestryder (2024-06-14 22:14:54+00:00): It is easy to do and I did the same. Seems everyone has to do it for some number of miles before they realize the error.

I only mentioned it on this old edit as I thought you might be able to help new comers avoid the same mistake.
emersonveenstra (2024-06-16 12:11:23+00:00): Yeah, thankfully it's mostly a semantic difference, I do sometimes point it out to newer mappers though
treestryder (2024-06-16 14:35:32+00:00): It prevents routing for walking and wheelchair use. And some of these paths allow horses or ATVs.

Yesterday I rode, with a 360 camera, another 16 miles (32 total) of The Great-Lake-To-Lake trail, starting at Wixom to Pontiac. The section was also signed to give walkers the right-of-way and the "abandoned railway" has long since been replaced or lost to time.

I don't get to do these rides often, so it will be slow going waiting for me to correct them. 😏
treestryder (2024-06-16 15:55:49+00:00): It would help if _someone_ wasn't going behind us undoing all this work. 😒
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139847915
emersonveenstra (2024-06-16 18:10:13+00:00): > It prevents routing for walking and wheelchair use. And some of these paths allow horses or ATVs.

Sure, but that's best solved by adding access tags (and descriptive tags) anyways, just changing it to path wouldn't make it routable for wheelchairs or ATVs.

> It would help if _someone_ wasn't going behind us undoing all this work. 😒

Lol, yeah, very much aware of him
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:50+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:25:03+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:48+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:24:56+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:46+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:24:49+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:45+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:24:40+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:43+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:24:34+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:42+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:24:26+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:40+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:24:19+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:39+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:24:10+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:37+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:24:03+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:35+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:23:57+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
highflyer74 (2022-11-24 17:52:29+00:00): Moin!

Kurzer Hinweis: Windkraftanlagen haben in OSM keinen Namen. Alle Daten können über die entsprechenden Attribute (Tags) abgebildet werden. Bitte schau dir den dazugehörigen Wikiartikel an:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:generator:source%3Dwind

Danke!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:33+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:23:49+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:31+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:23:43+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:29+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:23:36+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:27+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:23:27+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 15:43:25+00:00): you continue making edits without specifying actual source, this is not OK

you should provide source when you make edit, not only on request

what specific source was used to make this edit?

and please start specifying source when you make edits
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:23:16+00:00): https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
danieldegroot2 (2022-05-02 20:16:28+00:00): Contact mappers -at least publicly- if they make mistakes where possible (at least if they're still active), please..
I've left a comment here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92667430

Also, I would not recommend starting editing in OSM by validating others edits.
Everyone makes mistakes.
Start by editing yourself, learn about OSM and mapping, connect with the community and have fun! :-)

Regards,

Daniel
Sylv1_Durif (2022-05-02 21:36:04+00:00): I did it because by analyzing the values, I found it weird, and when I saw your message, from 1 year ago, I did it because it did nothing... But on normal case, that's what I'm trying to do!