piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
teodorab_telenav (2018-01-08 15:07:44+00:00): Hello Alister,

The source for the changeset is Bing Aerial Imagery.
About the Turnstyle Crescent, you were right. I corrected the mistake.
About the confusion for the road geometry, I updated based on satellite imagery ( I saw the configuration of the roads on the ground)
In wiki is a note :"Since most construction sites are not accessible to the public, it might be tough to get detailed GPS tracks of roads which have not yet been built. In that case, it's usually sufficient to roughly trace the route, and increase the detail level once the road is open."
On this sources I was confident that the roads that are under construction will be placed like this. In the situation that the roads will be located on other emplacements, that can be changed when the roads will be open as wiki suggests.
Here are the wiki pages that I used to take a decision about how it  should  be used  the construction/proposed tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
alester (2018-01-09 02:06:51+00:00): As I said, I visited the location in person, and have confirmed that the majority of these roads are not under construction yet. Further, I've yet to see any evidence that the proposed layout has been drastically changed as per the changes you had made. What you can see in the Bing imagery is simply some equipment shaping the ground in the area. The location of a piece of equipment does not mean that's where the road will be. Further, you still had mapped Turnstyle Crescent extending farther than is currently open. These are all examples of why you can't map a situation like this remotely from aerial imagery. You should leave mapping like this to the local mappers, who can visit in person and map the reality. As a result of the numerous incorrect changes you made, I've reverted your changes and then updated the small portions that have actually changed. Please do not make any more changes in that area, because you simply don't have access to enough information to adequately map the changing area. In the future, please do not guess about the situation in an area. If you don't know for sure, it's better to not make any changes.
teodorab_telenav (2018-01-10 14:00:37+00:00): Hello Alister,

Thank you for getting involved in making a good map.If you know from local knowledge I assume that your new updates in the area are correct.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

Best regards,
Teodora
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-06 11:04:22+00:00): Hi Eark39, welcome to OSM.  Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55128149
alester (2018-01-07 02:09:25+00:00): Why have you deleted the detailed mapping of these turning loops and replaced them with more basic (and incorrect) turning circles? Not only is the mapping now less detailed than previously and now incorrect, you failed to reconnect a trail to the road it joins. Also, Capella Drive is not under construction. Construction on that project halted many years ago.
teodorab_telenav (2018-01-08 15:05:34+00:00): Hello Alister,

I deleted the geometry for the turning loops and I replaced it with the tag: turning loop, as Wiki indicates: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=turning_loop 
After receiving your message, I verified  the area and I corrected the unconnected footway. 
About Cappela Drive, after checking satellite imagery (Bing Aerial Imagery, Digital Globe Standard Imagery and Esri Imagery) I observed  that the road seems to be under construction actions. Also I modified the tag for Cappela Drive (from construction to proposed).

Best regards,
Teodora
alester (2018-01-08 16:38:39+00:00): I wasn't aware that highway=turning_loop was a tag that was in active use. In that case, I have no problem with the use of that tag if a loop hasn't been mapped yet. However, you still deleted more detailed mapping with a oneway way and replaced it with a more basic single node. The way you've mapped it provides far less information than previously. Deleting more detailing mapping goes against the general mapping policies of OSM and is simply a confusing decision. Not only does the wiki article not say that you should replace detailed mapping with a node, it even mentions the scenario under which these loops were previously mapped:
"If you trace the entire loop, special tags are not needed (use oneway=yes if such restriction is posted)."
Please revert these edits to restore the detailed mapping that I had performed, and you should also revert any similar changes you may have made in other places.
alester (2018-01-08 16:40:03+00:00): Please also communicate this to your fellow Telenav employees. I've seen others making the same damaging mistake and had to revert those changes.
teodorab_telenav (2018-01-11 14:52:37+00:00): Hello Alister,

I added the geometry for the turning loop.
Sorry for the inconvenience.

Best regards,
Teodora
DD1GJ (2018-01-03 13:26:49+00:00): Hallo sixdata, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Leider ist der Bayernatlas als Datenquelle für OSM ausdrücklich nicht erlaubt. Zulässig seitens der Landesvermessung sind nur https://www.ldbv.bayern.de/produkte/weitere/opendata.html

Obige Daten können auch nur verwendet werden, weil es eine gesonderte Regelung bezüglich der Namensnennung der Quelle gibt. Das Grundproblem ist die Vererbungsproblematik der Namensnennung, die bei auf OSM basierenden Produkten nicht mehr gewährleistet ist. Achte bitte auch bei anderen Quellen auf deren Nutzungsbedingungen.

Wirklich frei ist nur das, was Du z.B. im öffentlichen Raum auf Straßenschildern gesehen hast.
kasmar00 (2018-01-24 20:47:54+00:00): Nazwa ulicy faktycznie została zmieniona poprzez zarządzenie zastępcze jednak miasto nie do końca akceptuje tą decyzje. Stan faktyczny (według znaków na ulicy oraz Systemu Informacji Przestrzennej) jest więc taki że ulica nosi nazwę 23 Lutego. Mapy OSM mają w zamyśle prezentować stan faktyczny (dający możliwość orientacji w terenie) a nie "abstrakcyjny" stan prawny. Ulica powinna więc nosić na mapie nazwę 23 Lutego do czasu wymiany znaków na ulicy oraz zmiany w SIP.
W celu utrzymania wysokiej jakości danych oraz ich przydatności/uzyteczności zasadne byłoby wycofanie tego zestawu zmian.
polar7 (2018-01-25 06:38:36+00:00): Ulica jest oficjalnie zmieniona i taki jest stan faktyczny i prawny.
W Systemie Informacji Przestrzennej nie istnieje już ulica 23 lutego, jest tylko por. J. Lewandowskiej.
To kiedy będą poprawione znaki na ulicy nie powinno determinować poprawności danych na mapie. To mapa ma być aktualna, a nie powinna kierować się znakami na ulicy. Przecież zdarzają się przypadki, że ulice mają stare  i nowe nazwy na ulicy, bo komuś zapomniało się zdemontować tablicę.
"...W celu utrzymania wysokiej jakości danych oraz ich przydatności/uzyteczności.." zasadne jest właśnie prezentowanie najnowszych danych.
polar7 (2018-01-25 06:40:07+00:00): http://195.216.117.150/sip/nmap/mapa/1/default
maraf24 (2018-01-25 17:40:16+00:00): "To kiedy będą poprawione znaki na ulicy nie powinno determinować poprawności danych na mapie."
Wprost przeciwnie. W takiej sytuacji w OSM tag name powinien mieć nazwę z terenu, a ta z aktów prawnych powinna być w official_name, do czasu zmiany tabliczek.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_practice#Mapuj.2C_co_jest_na_ziemi
Olga | Yanosik (2018-01-26 09:11:14+00:00): Proponuję, do czasu fizycznej zmiany tabliczek, nową nazwę dodać w tagu official_name, a starą zostawić w name + odpowiedni komentarz w note. Inaczej dojdzie do sytuacji jak w Warszawie, że średnio co kilka godzin ktoś przywraca Aleja Armii Ludowej z ul. Lecha Kaczyńskiego. Proponuję też dodać tag check_date, z prawdopodobną datą zmiany w terenie, żeby w odpowiednim czasie sprawdzić.
alester (2018-01-07 02:10:53+00:00): The roads you've marked as under construction are not being built yet. Early site preparation is still ongoing and currently the work is focusing on the Galloping Goose cycle trail.
teodorab_telenav (2018-01-08 15:06:18+00:00): Hello Alister,

I saw in Open Street Cam and Bing Aerial Imagery that in the area the construction site is in progress.
Because the tags were "proposed", and  the roads are under construction, I updated the tag to "construction". Also I changed back to proposed the segments of road that intersect with the main roads (because it doesn’t start the construction on that segments according to OSC)
On wiki pages is mentioned that we can add construction tag: "to describe the type of the feature which is currently under construction”. For the tag proposed: "This key can be used for any feature that  is still in planning phase but construction hasn't yet started. For features under construction use construction=* instead."
Here are the wiki pages that I used to be sure how to use construction/proposed tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed

Best regards,
Teodora
Martin Borsje (2018-01-03 17:05:22+00:00): goede edit; ik heb alleen een node van de sloot aan het grass vastgmaakt; dat was je vergeten. Overigens kun je een sloot ook als lijnelement intekenen als die, zeg, niet meer dan een meter breed is.
dapoldi (2018-01-03 17:43:20+00:00): Lijnelement is duidelijk een goed idee inderdaad, zal ik gebruik van maken voor de resterende sloten in de omgeving zodra ik daaraan toe kom, bedankt Martin.
catdreamer (2018-01-07 02:47:36+00:00): 提醒一下，大橫屏山步道與南稜線水長流線三叉口，放大檢視並未做好路線連結，有斷口
Digne (2018-01-03 19:25:28+00:00): I merged the shop with the existing address node.
reddox (2018-07-02 08:44:58+00:00): @advik2000 shouldn't the city's name be Hyderabad?
adivik2000 (2018-07-02 08:47:00+00:00): @reddox It is. Could you be a bit more precise?
reddox (2018-07-02 08:56:50+00:00): It was "Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation" till a few minutes ago. I just renamed it. Relation 7868535
adivik2000 (2018-07-02 09:04:52+00:00): Oh. That’s the municipal boundary and is correct. Renaming the relation to Hyderabad would exclude other suburbs that are in Hyderabad but isn’t part of the municipal corporation. The Hyderabad you’re referring to is the Hyderabad district - which should technically be the boundary of the city but that is not really considered as the city is growing rapidly and everyone wants the city label.
lleung (2018-01-17 05:45:32+00:00): 玉带濠我实地考察过，是人行街道，车辆无法进入的。生活性街道是汽车可以进入的居民区道路。这个属性更改并不妥当。
lleung (2018-01-20 05:24:58+00:00): reverted
opendcc (2024-11-15 10:15:33+00:00): Overlap-Kuddelmuddel?
Digne (2018-01-03 19:26:35+00:00): I merged the shop with the existing address node
Sanniu (2019-04-30 07:03:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550647234 is missing a tag, can you, please tag it (footpath, probably)
user_5359 (2018-01-03 17:20:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. And don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:17:46+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
Digne (2018-01-03 15:18:53+00:00): Hallo ErnstdeB,

Ik zag dat je om feedback gevraagd had.

De tags zien er allemaal goed uit. Ik vraag me alleen af of de naam klopt. Heet het echt alleen "Pizzeria"?
ErnstdeB (2018-01-04 15:31:59+00:00): Dag Digne, je hebt helemaal gelijk. Die is blijven staan vanuit een eerdere wijzigingenset, waarin nog wat meer foutjes stonden ;-) .
Gecorrigeerd en zal m zo doorvoeren.
Groetjes, Ernst.
Digne (2018-01-04 15:32:47+00:00): Prima!
woodpeck_repair (2018-08-14 13:51:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61658928 where the changeset comment is: remove 'Dipiazza' edits that either list google among the sources, or are often reported as wrong/vandalism by other users
gendy54 (2018-01-06 23:48:25+00:00): Attention pour les groupes scolaires. Il y a bien une école et un collège donc 2 ref:UAI. L'ancien nom était je pense plus correct. Regarde sur le wiki comment cartographier les groupes scolaires pour montrer la réalité de 2 niveaux de formation.
gendy54 (2018-01-06 23:48:47+00:00): http://www.education.gouv.fr/pid24302/annuaire-resultat-recherche.html?lycee_name=&localisation=1&ville_name=Aixe+sur+vienne
deuzeffe (2018-01-13 17:17:41+00:00): C'est corrigé/amélioré
woodpeck_repair (2018-08-14 13:51:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61658928 where the changeset comment is: remove 'Dipiazza' edits that either list google among the sources, or are often reported as wrong/vandalism by other users
abakus_uploader (2018-01-03 23:31:04+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897 - tam również proszę zadawać ewentualne pytania.
Pozdrawiamy!
Cascafico (2018-01-15 10:00:36+00:00): nomi inventati assegnati più volte; l'utente cambia nome per rendere la history realistica.
multiple fake names assigned to way 449265941; user has changed name to simulate multiuser edit history
woodpeck_repair (2018-08-14 13:51:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61658928 where the changeset comment is: remove 'Dipiazza' edits that either list google among the sources, or are often reported as wrong/vandalism by other users
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-01-03 14:08:32+00:00): Não use nomes para colocar instrução de direção assim, os nomes devem ser os oficiais.
FABIO SOUSA (2018-01-04 11:47:14+00:00): Eu entendo, porém essa região só existe extrada de piçarra que não tem nome oficial. minha intençao foi fazer quem tiver usando o maps saíba pra onde está indo. exemplo. "Estrada de acesso até a onça" ou " Acesso Murici ao povoado onça". mas, vou corrigir esse comentario " seguindo a mão"
dmlu (2018-01-03 14:13:07+00:00): Added review_requested tag as the boundary from "Pedraires" crosses higher level boundaries. Need to validate using the other import dataset.
M!dgardAutomated (2018-01-03 13:55:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54004612, 54098613, 54098660, 54099573, 54099628, 54116627, 54116644, 54116692, 54118708, 54146130.
GinaroZ (2018-01-03 14:52:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74485120 is not a building
smeòrach (2018-01-03 16:37:57+00:00): Thanks, have fixed that.
eggie (2018-01-03 17:04:18+00:00): construction=cycleway moet er nog af. het zuidelijk deel.. is dat geen fietspad?
Graag reactie
dirk26 (2018-01-03 17:11:49+00:00): De brug is technisch af en wordt informeel al gebruikt, maar er staat nog een bord "gesloten", waarschijnlijk vooral omdat de zuidelijke aansluiting aan Keimate nog niet gereed is. Deze situatie is vermoedelijk tijdelijk, zodra het af is zal ik de "construction" tag verwijderen en het zuidelijke deel op highway=cycleway zetten.
eggie (2018-01-03 17:28:40+00:00): Oke... duidelijk. Bedankt voor je reactie.
DD1GJ (2018-01-04 08:42:24+00:00): Revert, da fiktive Parks, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54969018
RicoElectrico (2018-01-03 19:02:44+00:00): Skąd taka zmiana? Zauważ, że track to droga polna bardziej w znaczeniu prowadząca do, a nie po prostu przez pole. Tracki są z tego powodu omijane przez wiele nawigacji. Czy gmina wybudowała ten kawałek tylko po to, żeby rolnicy mieli dojazd?
Dinamik (2018-01-08 00:35:50+00:00): Здравствуйте! Территория детских садов не соответствует уровню доступа access=yes. Ваши действия приводят к нарушению маршрутизации, т. к. приводят к закрытым воротам, через которые посторонних не пускают. Пожалуйста, не ставьте access=yes (что подразумевается по умолчанию) на ворота, территории и дороги с ограниченным доступом. Ваше тегирование доступа не корректно. access=yes соответствуют полностью открытому для всех доступу, что, очевидно, не соответствует тегируемым территориям детских садов, т. к. на них установлен пропускной режим, доступ ограничен.

P. S. Ранее я уже обращался к Вам: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54892305 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54892323 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54892402 , http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54892414
bdustan (2018-01-04 00:08:46+00:00): Hi,
The Megawatt Drive added in this changeset does not exist. It used to exist as South Service Road. This road was demolished in 2017 to make way for the 401-418 interchange.
teodorab_telenav (2018-01-04 10:47:07+00:00): Hi Bdustan,
  I added the road Megawatt Drive because on  Bing Aerial Imagery appear to be a road in use. I did a research and i didn't find a source to confirm that the Megawatt Drive is demolished, closed or realigned. (see http://www.clarington.net/en/live-here/resources/Roads-and-Sidewalks/Highway-407-Road-Closures-List.pdf). 
  If you know for sure that the road is demolished confirmed me and I will change. Or if you know from local knowledge feel free to update the OSM Data.
Best regards,
Teodora
bdustan (2018-01-04 21:40:51+00:00): Hi Teodora,
I just (re-) deleted it.
viloan (2018-01-03 14:35:14+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-01-03 17:14:47+00:00): Je kunt bij de begraafplaatsen religion=christian toevoegen. Dan rendert het op de mapnik als kruisjes. 
De node die in het midden ligt kan helemaal weg.Je kunt gewoon cemetery gebruiken ipv grave_yard.
Verander je het zelf?
eggie (2018-01-03 17:26:31+00:00): amenity 	grave_yard 	Node Area 	Begraafplaats

Een kleine begraafplaats, vaak in de buurt van een kerk. Maak bij grotere begraafplaatsen liever gebruik van landuse=cemetery. 
Zou  toch grave_yard kunnen zijn.
dapoldi (2018-01-03 17:39:02+00:00): Beide kerkelijke begraafplaatsen voorzien van een religion tag, omdat ze beide kerkgebonden zijn zal ik ze op grave_yard laten staan. Wederom bedankt Eggie.
eggie (2018-01-03 20:40:49+00:00): Bij de Protestantse begraafplaats heb ik de naam op het vlak gezet en de node verwijderd. Anders geeft dat een foutmelding.
dapoldi (2018-01-03 21:19:10+00:00): *bloos*, bedankt!
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2019-01-27 00:03:03+00:00): Jeg har genåbnet broen på Kaj Lykkes Vej.
En anden gang må du godt sætte opening_date og check_date. Det gør det nemmere at få den slags genåbnet til tiden.
viloan (2018-01-03 15:08:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_6110846 (2018-01-20 20:02:12+00:00): Good evening ! the edit is deleted.The name "ruins" is not written. There are special schemes for this. In the future, discuss non-in-Poland changes to the local communities.

Dobry wieczór! edycja została usunięta.Nazwa "ruiny" nie jest napisana. Istnieją specjalne schematy. W przyszłości porozmawiaj o zmianach spoza Polski z lokalnymi społecznościami.
Pepilepioux (2018-01-07 10:01:51+00:00): Donc là il y a une boulangerie.
Bien.
Ce qui serait encore mieux ce serait de dessiner le bâtiment, et, cerise sur le gâteau, le parking tout autour avec sa voir d'accès.

Si ça vous intéresse, ça se fait très simplement avec JOSM (téléchargeable sur https://josm.openstreetmap.de/). Une bonne doc sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:JOSM.

Bonne journée

JP
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:17:48+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
Thalassin (2018-01-14 21:07:26+00:00): Hi Barny13, auch hier stellt sich mir die Frage, warum die NQV (Straße der Nationen bis AS EF-Roter Berg) jetzt plötzlich primary ist. Die Straße ist weder designierte Bundesstraße, noch ist sie Teil des Erfurter Rings. Bitte erläutere kurz, warum die das "primary"-Tag hier für gerechtfertigt hälst.
MfG Thalassin
Barny13 (2018-01-16 20:03:03+00:00): Hallo Thalassin,
sorry das mit der Straße der Nationen muss ich natürlich wieder zurück nehmen/ korrigieren, ansonsten beziehe die Daten hier von ...
https://www.thueringen.de/mam/th9/tlbv/strassenkarte_thuringen_2017.pdf
Thalassin (2018-01-18 18:31:09+00:00): Hallo Barny13,
du scheinst noch nicht sehr lange am OSM-Projekt mitzuarbeiten. Das ist nicht schlimm, aber deswegen ist es umso wichtiger, vor solchen großen Veränderungen kurz Rücksprache mit erfahreneren Mappern zu halten. 
Das Problem mit den von dir umgetaggten Straßen ist folgendes: OSM orientiert sich strikt an den vor Ort zu findenden Gegebenheiten. Die Übersetzung "Bundesstraße" für "highway:primary" ist beispielsweise nur ein grober Richtwert, weil nicht nur Bundesstraßen primary sein können. Ähnlich bei den Kreisstraßen: die K35 (ex B4) bis zur Fußgängerampel an der Ottostraße ist eine reine Schnellstraße (trunk), obwohl sie nur als Kreisstraße ausgeschildert ist. Bitte bedenke, dass die amtilichen Straßenklassen vor allem die Finanzierungsverantwortung klären (Bund-Land-Kommune). Deine amtliche Quelle ist damit nur von sekundärer Bedeutung für OSM.
Die Straße der Nationen/Am Roten Berg ist ein weiterer solcher Fall: Sicherlich nur Kreisstraße, aber von der lokalen Bedeutung her bisher zurecht als tertiary eingestuft. 
Ich möchte dich eindringlich bitten, deine Änderungen an der K35 rückgängig zu machen und auch die oben genannte Straße der Nationen bis zur AS "Erfurt-Roter Berg" wieder auf tertiary aufzustufen. Wenn du dir bei irgendwelchen Einstufungen unsicher bist, steht dir das Forum unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14 jederzeit offen. 
Viele Grüße,
Thalassin
Milancer (2018-01-06 11:57:07+00:00): Ahoj, zarovnání Stravou se trochu nepovedlo, utrhali se pravděpodobně chybně navázané cesty.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388182621 
Před automatickým zarovnáním je třeba načíst (zobrazit) celou rovnanou cestu, pak se neutrhají ani neposunou odbočky.