piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nlehuby (2018-02-01 19:47:21+00:00): Le tracé ne correspond pas exactement à la ligne 1 du réseau Aérial : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4230848
C'est peut-être bien cette ligne qui a évolué dépuis. Ou une autre ligne qui n'existe plus. Ou une autre ligne que seuls les locaux connaissent (navette, bus scolaire, etc).
Wulfmorn (2017-09-30 20:19:52+00:00): Howcome you copied Mauritius to the North sea?
Hjart (2017-09-30 20:23:56+00:00): Hi
You just made a copy of Mauritius over Denmark. I'm reverting immediately
mueschel (2019-06-04 14:00:10+00:00): Hi,
I found this way using a "destination:street" and a "destination:street:1" tag. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54692008

This splitting of a tag into two is not really common - do you know if there is a meaning behind this? Or is it possible to combine both tags into one?

Thanks
Jan
horisyu (2019-06-04 14:18:19+00:00): Hello.
It is the tag which was attached by mistake.
I will fix it soon.
Thank you for pointing it out.
mueschel (2019-06-04 14:25:25+00:00): Perfect, thanks for taking care!
Here's a Overpass query to find all the ways with this tag:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JFw
horisyu (2019-06-04 14:56:13+00:00): way 38789767, 553194725, 553194724, and 529047333 were similarly revised.
Thank you.
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-02 07:02:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52555138 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed changeset(s)
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-02 07:13:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52555366 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed changeset(s)
mavl (2017-10-02 14:54:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, по какой причине вы добавляете к существующим адресам домов название улицы "Менделеево микрорайон улица".
MaksimTo (2017-10-02 15:05:12+00:00): Здравствуйте, номер дома в поиске не находит без этого. Как-то вроде догадался как надо, и опять забыл.) Не подскажете?
mavl (2017-10-02 15:17:48+00:00): В каком поиске не находит?
MaksimTo (2017-10-02 15:21:00+00:00): В 2 гисе так решили проблему. Поэтому делаю также, как альтернатива, раз по другому не могу, place если только прописывать каждому дому, но это не вариант, проще пару улиц сделать в микрорайоне как в 2гисе и присваивать к дому из выпадающего меню типа улицу.
Например, Тобольск Менделеево 22 набираю и он не указывает на этот дом, если проезд не назвать также, "Менделеево"
MaksimTo (2017-10-02 15:21:58+00:00): Поиск адреса в осм
mavl (2017-10-02 15:36:11+00:00): OpenStreetMap - общая база данных. Нельзя что-то обозначать в ней под какой-либо навигатор, программу, сайт или 2ГИС. Прочитайте документацию про адресацию:  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses  
  
Очень многое, из того, что вы добавили в последнее время добавили, придётся удалить. Я понимаю, что не все навигаторы/программы поддерживают адресацию по микрорайонам. Тобольску в этом плане не повезло. Но ваше решение проблемы неправильное. Разработчики навигаторов могут поддерживать адресацию по микрорайонам, потому что данные для этого уже есть. Менять данные специально для них не нужно.
MaksimTo (2017-10-02 15:48:19+00:00): В общем от вас толку мало как я понял. Нет чтобы проблему помочь решить умничаете )))(
mavl (2017-10-02 15:57:31+00:00): Если вы знаете как решить проблему, то пишите на форум OSM:  
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21
eggie (2017-09-30 20:47:56+00:00): Please comment your edit
GeoMaus (2017-10-01 07:03:04+00:00): Hi eggie 
I am rather new to OSM. 
Please help me to understand what i should add as a comment after i added the name if the restaurant. 
Are you looking for something like "added name of the place"?

Thanks
eggie (2017-10-01 08:57:31+00:00): Hi GeoMaus.. Yes... "added name restaurant" that's the right comment ...
I'm not familiar with Go Map.. but I'm sure there is a possibility for comment. 
This was your edit http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52519981
RicoElectrico (2017-09-30 21:00:55+00:00): Cześć, dwie uwagi mam:

- Wydaje mi się, że zamiast highway=track (droga polna) lepszy byłby highway=service (droga wewnętrzna) na ten podjazd, z oznaczeniem nawierzchni.

- Druga, skąd numer domu na tej drodze dojazdowej?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529053264
maureis (2017-09-30 21:12:16+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za uwagi, wprowadziłem zmiany. Numer domu faktycznie chyba bez sensu, usunąłem.
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-02 07:02:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52555138 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed changeset(s)
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-02 07:13:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52555366 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed changeset(s)
EugenyN (2017-10-01 18:09:46+00:00): это название магазина ? в name нужно писать название магазина
eggie (2017-09-30 21:03:32+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-30 21:12:02+00:00): info samengevoegd met adres node .. religion en denomination  toegevoegd.
BeKri (2017-11-13 15:42:59+00:00): Cool,
natural= beach mit surface = asphalt ...
Was soll der Blödsinn ?
Kiekin (2017-11-13 15:24:43+00:00): Was soll das sein? Ist das noch aktuell? Woher hast du diese Informationen?
BeKri (2017-11-13 15:55:31+00:00): Habs rausgeschmissen
Константин Гам (2018-11-05 08:46:09+00:00): Интересно зачем вы добавили vehicle=no который блокирует движение с Лиговского на Гончарную...
Dinamik (2018-11-06 14:56:35+00:00): Здравствуйте! С учётом того, что ту линию, на которую я добавлял vehicle=no, уже успели после меня 5 раз отредактировать, я не уверен, что на момент добавления тег vehicle=no блокировал поворот с Лиговского проспекта на Гончарную улицу. Насколько я понимаю, блокировались движение с Лиговского проспекта к Невскому проспекту и уход на разворот по площади Восстания. Вы проверяли правки https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53045663 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54397166 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59684994 ?
surveyor54 (2017-10-02 17:06:35+00:00): Hallo rd911ra, 
es wäre schön, wenn du die Tipps, die dir R0bst3r hier gegeben hat, auch umsetzten würdest. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52245236#map=16/53.6840/8.5620

Wir haben alle einmal angefangen und mussten erst unsere Erfahrungen machen.

Wenn man etwas einträgt, sollte man sich bemühen das richtig zu machen und sich mit der Materie beschäftigen.
Irgend jemand muss das im Nachhinein wieder richten, das ist doch nicht Sinn der Sache.

Hier ein schönes Tutorial vom Kollegen Kreuzschnabel:

http://einklich.net/osm/osm-tutorial.pdf

oder auch hier:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

oder das Forum mit netten Kollegen, die helfen gerne:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Gruß
surveyor54
user_5359 (2017-10-01 07:40:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t paint a building in a building. I have move your information to a node (also level=1 from changeset comment)
DaveF (2017-10-01 20:23:36+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM
Do you know how vehicles get to the camp site?
ndm (2017-10-01 21:54:45+00:00): Be careful are you sure that there's a licence to use data from KnowYourPlace in OSM.

Even diigitizing and ortho-correcting old maps is likely to generate a new copyrighted product.
AndyReid56 (2017-10-01 22:34:03+00:00): Hi,
The road access comes under the railway and there is a gate at the north end of the campsite, roughly a hundred meters north of the bend.  The land North of the campsite is under separate ownership, and currently used as a landfill site.  There is a planning dispute between the owner of the campsite and the owner of the landfill, details of which are posted on the gate to the landfill, which is alleged to be unlicensed.  There is definitely no path linking Station Lane to Boiling Wells.  As to KnowYourPlace, I was only consulting copies of C19 maps, which I assume are public-domain by now?  But I know copyright is a minefield.  

I'm confused how the comment from this ended up stuck on unrelated edits.  Does the editor default to applying the last comment by default?  I think I see how it happened now, but I can't work out how to reopen the changeset to fix it.  

Sorry to be a klutz, I probably should have taken it slower on my first attempt.

Andy
ndm (2017-10-01 23:20:41+00:00): No worries, you've probably saved people taking a spurious shortcut now.
DaveF (2017-10-04 12:53:34+00:00): Hi
For the extent it's accessible by vehicles (up to the farm?) the path would better tagged be tagged as highway=service.
If it's a designated PROW (with signs?) then this tag is appropriate for it's full length. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation.
I've added the farm, the only bit I can do from aerial imagery
ndm (2017-10-01 21:54:57+00:00): Does the edit really match the comment?
user_5359 (2017-10-01 07:45:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
ndm (2017-10-01 21:55:01+00:00): Does the edit really match the comment?
felipeeugenio (2018-02-28 12:39:32+00:00): Estimado
el tag building es para las estructuras, no para el recinto completo. Para eso es mejor usar el tag landuse. 
saludos
ndm (2017-10-01 21:55:04+00:00): Does the edit really match the comment?
AndyReid56 (2017-10-01 22:02:13+00:00): Not sure what happened here.  I made that comment for an earlier edit, and it has turned up on every edit I made.
ndm (2017-10-01 22:28:23+00:00): No worries; I marked them all so I could see it might not match in the future.


At least it wasn't empty or one character long -- which can be really hard to select if I'm using firefox on a phone.
ndm (2017-10-01 21:55:08+00:00): Does the edit really match the comment?
ndm (2017-10-01 21:55:12+00:00): Does the edit really match the comment?
Marc Veneroso (2017-10-01 00:01:47+00:00): Updated business name and contact info
mosstreet (2017-10-01 17:37:45+00:00): точно именно в этой точке? там вообще то развилка дорог
user_5359 (2017-10-01 06:30:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t use the key name for description!
user_5359 (2017-10-01 06:31:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add the address only to the main building.
CapAhab (2017-10-03 20:53:37+00:00): Thanks for catching this!
felipeeugenio (2018-06-09 22:25:14+00:00): town? está bien?
jptolosa (2018-06-10 00:41:10+00:00): Lo dejé como village ahora
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 08:04:27+00:00): Hello Paul Johnson. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52525012
you have tagged the misspelled
`bicycle:laens:forward=designated` and
`bicycle:lanes:forward=designated`, right?
Baloo Uriza (2017-10-06 14:21:57+00:00): Well, not intentionally.  Whoops!
Marych_ (2017-10-01 06:22:51+00:00): Добрый день
если местный, можете точки подъездов (номер и список квартир) сделать как на 5 куйлюке?
igor19831 (2017-10-01 12:17:05+00:00): Доброго дня, пытался, так понимаю, не получилось. Подучу в свободное время раздел "Помощь", дополню.
5m4u9 (2017-10-02 02:54:12+00:00): este departamento es de tipo comercial? o solo referencia a posible venta del inmueble?
anmarenja (2017-10-10 23:40:15+00:00): From what I can see, all the buildings are marked correctly on the bing layer, but are a bit off in the Digital-globe Standard Imagery layer, I noticed, because I had the same issue with mine, and I couldnt really get the two to match. But good work Holly.
eserte (2017-10-11 22:16:27+00:00): Die Staatsoper ist zwar wieder offen, aber die Straße Bebelplatz (in Verlängerung der Straße Hinter der Katholischen Kirche) kann noch immer nicht befahren werden (access=no?).
geozeisig (2017-10-12 07:00:31+00:00): Ja ich habe es inzwischen auch gesehen die Straße ist noch im Bau. Aber danke für den Hinweis
Warin61 (2017-10-04 21:24:42+00:00): The relation 7618908... has an inner touch the outer at node 5140696134.  

This should not be done. Suggest that the node be removed from the outer way.
TheSwavu (2017-10-05 00:08:08+00:00): Inner way only touches outer way a one point. This is a valid multipolygon, no need to edit.
Fulvio Senore (2024-06-03 07:13:48+00:00): Ciao, pochi giorni fa sono passato dall’Alpe della Portia e ho notato che su OSM c’è questo sentiero che hai aggiunto tu. Il tracciato sembra strano così ho controllato il punto di inizio e non ho visto nessun sentiero. Inoltre il tracciato sale direttamente per un pendio ripido e poi dovrebbe subito scendere dall’altra parte mentre mi aspetterei che il percorso aggirasse questo rilevo.
Anni fa sono salito all’Adois e non mi ricordo che ci fossero grandi sentieri.
Sei sicuro che questo sentiero esista veramente?
adriespo (2024-06-03 07:21:27+00:00): E tu sei sicuro di sapere di cosa stai parlando?

Quella è la Via Normale per l'accesso all'Adois.

Sei mai salito sull'Adois?
adriespo (2024-06-03 07:22:33+00:00): "Si percorre il sentiero lungo il vallone del Gravio abbastanza pianeggiante fino a quota 1500 dove il vallone si allarga proseguire in direzione nord est lasciando sulla dx l’alpe della Portia 1926.
Ora si segue il sentiero dietro l’alpeggio che conduce al Colle della Portia. Quando questo attraversa un vasto pianoro erboso con due collinette sulla sinistra, si piega a sinistra e si rintraccia un sentierino poco marcato che sale sulla cresta erbosa che scende dall’Adois, in corrispondenza del primo di tre grossi ometti visibili da sotto.
Ora si deve percorrere l’ampia dorsale erbosa priva di sentiero. Quando si arriva al terzo ed ultimo ometto si può scegliere se proseguire in cresta (via via più affilata ma non difficile), oppure rintracciare un vago sentiero che si tiene sul versante sud tagliando a mezza costa i ripidi prati (nessun problema senza neve o ghiaccio).
Si giunge così ad una piccola depressione, oltre la quale il sentiero diventa finalmente ben visibile. Non resta che seguirlo fino in cima, percorrendo il pendio esposto a nord della cima dell’Adois, senza alcuna difficoltà fino in vetta (cartello)."

https://www.gulliver.it/itinerari/adois-punta-dell-da-grange/
Fulvio Senore (2024-06-03 16:06:57+00:00): Però, complimenti per il tono della risposta!
Non credi che sarebbe meglio rimanere su tono civili ed educati, visto che abbiamo tutti lo stesso obbiettivo? Poi avresti potuto leggere tutto il mio messaggio così non mi avresti chiesto se sono salito sull’Adois, visto che ti avevo scritto di esserci stato.

La relazione che hai riportato conferma i miei dubbi: dice di seguire dall’Alpe della Portia il sentiero per il Colle della Portia ed abbandonarlo più avanti. E’ giusto che sia così per aggirare il cocuzzolo che c’è appena dietro l’Alpe. Il tuo tracciato si stacca subito dall’Alpe per salire e ridiscendere per dritto quel cocuzzolo. Se non lo hai già fatto puoi attivare un layer con le curve di livello e l’ombreggiatura dei rilievi come Tracestrack Topo per verificare che il tracciato non va tanto bene, perlomeno per la parte iniziale.
Poi il fatto che quella sia la via normale per l’Adois non vuole mica dire che c’è un sentiero. Infatti anche la relazione che citi dice che in molte parti del percorso non c’è sentiero.
Per evitare problemi agli utenti non credi che sarebbe bene aggiungere il tag “trail_visibility=no”?

Il sentiero di cui stiamo parlando è stato ottenuto da una traccia GPS di una escursione o è stato creato a tavolino in un momento successivo?
adriespo (2024-06-03 16:25:06+00:00): Questo è il mio ultimo messaggio al riguardo.

1) hai scritto "Sei sicuro che questo sentiero esista veramente?", cosa pensi che inserisco sentieri che non esistono? Ti ho fatto la stessa domanda inopportuna che hai fatto tu, ti ha dato fastidio? Bene, si chiama reciprocità. Sii gentile e le persone saranno gentili con te.

2) scrivi "ho controllato il punto di inizio e non ho visto nessun sentiero." Non hai visto una traccia battuta? Non hai visto bolli? Sinceramente non so che dirti, la Via Normale è quella e quando ci sono andato io la traccia era evidente, se veramente il sentiero si è perso scrivi tranquillmanente che oggi trail_visibility=no senza chiedere a uno che l'ha disegnato anni e anni fa in condizioni che non esistono più, nel bene e nel male.


3) ho disegnato il tracciato a memoria e ovviamente può essere perfettibile: se pensi che ci sia un errore nella parte dell'itinerario che citi, e tu hai una migliore conoscenza, vai e modifica! Io ricordo sinceramente di essere passato sul colletto tra la puntina dell'alpeggio e il Piano dei Martiri e così ho disegnato, ma di nuovo, sono passati anni e potrei essermi sbagliato, allora.

In generale sarebbe stato bello se tu avessi commentato "Ho migliorato il tratto del sentiero che hai creato anni e anni fa", ma in generale proprio non c'è bisogno di commentare con qualcosa del tipo "sei sicuro che sta roba che hai messo esista".

Le mappe sono qualcosa in divenire, e il nostro compito è quello di tenerle sempre aggiornate, non di chiedere a utenti "Sei sicuro che quesa roba esista veramente?" 

Buona fortuna.
dsh4 (2017-10-05 12:11:39+00:00): Hi Mr Massri,

Is "according to Oslo Accords" really the name of this feature?  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things .

I guess we should just rename the tags from name:foo to description:foo.  What do you think?

dsh4
Mr Massri (2017-10-05 20:21:03+00:00): Hi,
Maybe it is sounds not good, but that it's name. In the oslo agreement map, this place named only "Nature Reserve", but for making connection to it's origin, I named it "Nature Reserve according to Oslo Accords"
dsh4 (2017-10-05 22:23:46+00:00): That's precisely my point: the "name" tags are _not_ how one should describe which international agreement established some area as a nature reserve.  Such information belongs in other tags; not in the 'name' tag.

I think one of the following two changes is needed:

- Change name:foo to description:foo

or

- Remove name:foo and add a "source=Oslo Accords" tag.

Makes sense?

Thanks!
Mr Massri (2017-10-06 08:37:59+00:00): Ok, changing "name" to "description".
dsh4 (2017-10-06 14:11:24+00:00): Looks good to me.  Cheers!
user_5359 (2017-10-01 13:43:55+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Hast Di das Gelände https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73913261 gesehen? Ich habe Deinen Eintrag mit diesem Gelände zusammengeführt.
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-02 07:02:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52555138 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed changeset(s)
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-02 07:12:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52555366 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed changeset(s)
zstadler (2017-10-02 06:21:10+00:00): Thanks for the correction!
Cascafico (2017-10-01 11:02:35+00:00): Ciao, é una bella giornata: esci e divertiti, che tanto domani annulliamo il tuo lavoro.
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-02 07:02:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52555138 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed changeset(s)
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-02 07:13:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52555366 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed changeset(s)
majid1359 (2017-10-01 08:20:15+00:00): مکان مسجد محمدی اشتباه بود از روی نقشه پاک شد
borishag (2017-10-10 12:22:04+00:00): Hallo Lodde,

Waarom heb je de node van onze Kruidvat vestiging verwijderd van deze locatie:
Heistraat 20-26 Wilrijk?

B. Hageman
Editor for AS Watson Health & Beauty Benelux formula stores:
Kruidvat; NL BE, FR
Trekpleister
Pour Vous
Prijsmepper
ICI PARIS XL; NL, BE, LU, DE
woodpeck (2017-10-01 19:07:39+00:00): nyuriks, you have in the past made edits claimed to be "as per discussion on talk list" when the discussion on the talk list certainly not meant you had an all clear for the edit. Now you claim to make edits "per community discussion in telegram chat", which third parties cannot even check - for all i know, it was you and two sock puppets in that chat at 4am when nobody else was listening. If you want to use a chat discussion as the reason for making an edit, please put the relevant parts of that somewhere, so that others can see if the matter was indeed widely discussed in the community.
nyuriks (2017-10-01 19:27:32+00:00): fair point (and no, I come from Wikipedia background and really don't like sockpuppets).   Take a look at the #osm-ru IRC channel - the channel topic says:  "https://telegram.me/ruosm >> жизнь переехала в телеграм" (there are ~250 people there).   Also, IRC channel gets a copy of every message from Telegram. 
My message was posted on 9/12 - Всем привет. Я в последнее время занимался интеграцией с Викиданными, пытаясь их чуток причесать. К примеру, часто используется тэг wikidata/wikipedia вместо более точного operator:wikipedia, или subject:.., brand:.., и т.д.  Теперь когда у нас есть возможность проанализировать OSM вместе с Wikidata в одной query, предлагаю такие ляпы исправить.  Например, очень много ATM указывают на банк с помощью wikidata - надо-бы их заменить на brand:wikidata (у АТМ может быть оператор, но не банк?).  МакДональдс яркий пример - оператор там не подходит, так как он разный в разных странах. или даже местная компания, а вот марка универсальна везде, и позволяет легко их всех находить... Мысли?
edited 
Для самих wikidata/wikipedia  -- использовать их только если сама вики статья имеет те-же координаты.  Другими словами - только при соответствии 1:1.  Статья про OSM объект, и объект ссылается на статью
aharvey (2018-01-22 07:03:11+00:00): whats https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529140614 for? The Royal Botanic Garden is mapped out at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3744999 it seems to overlap it.
Leon K (2018-01-22 08:00:52+00:00): To be honest, not sure.  I cleaned up the edge of an existing area, no idea how I ended up replacing it, especially since it was 4 months ago.
Warin61 (2018-05-17 22:46:33+00:00): ??? Deleted ... leisure=park ... inside the botanic gardens... make no sense.
Leon K (2018-05-17 23:19:21+00:00): I wish i'd never touched this one.  As far as as I remember there were multiple areas overlapping.  I remember smoothing the edge,
Warin61 (2018-05-18 00:37:16+00:00): Hopefully (wishful thinking?) I have managed to catch most of my mistakes before someone else noticed ... 
Fingers crossed that this deletion is ok. I think it is .. I did some work on these gardens - separating up the domain etc ... and adding paths, art work .. that was some time ago. 
Presently trying to add addresses to the CBD from LPI Base Map.  Made some errors on corner blocks and some gross errors too.. as I say these I have picked up.
ndmystko (2017-10-02 10:25:20+00:00): Hej Olga,
W gazecie piszą, że piesi i rowerzyści mogą się tam poruszać. Wiesz coś o tym? Jeśli tak to powinno być motor_vehicle=no.
Pozdrawiam
Olga | Yanosik (2017-10-02 11:09:40+00:00): Oczywiście, za dużo zakazów dodałam. 
Już poprawione, dzięki!
tux67 (2018-06-25 14:08:58+00:00): Hi sawkins,

bin gerade über den Namen "Einsatzgebiet LE Oberbruch" gestolpert .. soll das ein Eintrag aus dem Bereich Feuerwehr sein. Wenn ja, dann scheint mir OSM mit einem landuse=residential mit diesem Namen zu versehen nicht der richtige Ansatz. Könntest du das mal erläutern?

Gruß
Stephan (tux67)
eggie (2017-10-01 11:22:29+00:00): Mogen fietsers wel tegen het verkeer in ??.. dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=yes
eggie (2017-10-02 16:20:53+00:00): Wanneer er geen ander verkeer mag komen dan wordt er meestal getagd access=no
psv=yes
maar edits met bus heb ik ook al eens gezien.
Er staan ook al tags op van een voorgaande mapper waar ik twijfels over heb.
Wanneer fietsers er mogen komen wel taggen bicycle=yes
Mogen fietsers niet tegen de richting in .. niet benoemen
Mogen fietsers wel tegen de richting in dan oneway:bicycle=no
Kijk je nog even...
Ik zet de edit even op het forum voor tips...
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=666261#p666261
Allroads (2017-10-02 18:31:14+00:00): een route (busroute) maakt een weg nog geen oneway.

Bepalend is welke borden er staan aan beide kanten, pas als we dat weten kunnen we de tags bespreken.

De combinatie van key value geeft nu aanleiding tot vragen. permissive is zo'n value.

Welke borden staan er?

Bij C1 is de basis, zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden#C:_Geslotenverklaring