piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2018-02-17 06:34:08+00:00): Loren - The address tags for Cascade Wagon Road Campground aren't standard tags. It looks like Yellow Pine is correct. Could you redo the campground addr tags? Thanks
Glassman (2018-02-17 17:19:32+00:00): Sorry I must not have been very clear. I went ahead and fixed the address tags.  You can see the changes on https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56445520?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Glassman%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Glassman%22%7D%5D%7D
driveassistant (2018-11-26 21:51:32+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe,

du hast hier eine Abbiegebeschränkung erstellt (Bebenhäuser Straße, Relation 7974109). Da sind allerdings noch zwei Leichen drinn. Ich vermute die sind noch vom Way splitten an dieser Stelle.

Könntest du da noch einmal bei schauen?

Grüße
driveassistant
Peilscheibe (2018-11-26 22:20:40+00:00): Ist repariert, danke fürs finden.
Grüße, P.
driveassistant (2018-11-26 22:23:43+00:00): Super, danke. Jetzt hast du allerdings zwei "from" Member gesetzt :D
Peilscheibe (2018-11-26 22:42:08+00:00): Das ist ja auch so. Die Einfahrt in den to-way ist aus beiden am via-node ankommenden Richtungen untersagt (ohne dass dahinter eine Einbahnstraße ist). Genau für diesen Zweck gibt es die no_entry-restriction.
Grüße, P.
driveassistant (2018-11-26 22:44:42+00:00): Ach ja richtig, Entschuldigung. Hatte ganz vergessen, dass es ja auch mehrere from und to Ways geben kann bei no-entry. Mein Fehler :D

Danke fürs Ändern.
Gruß driveassistant
Peilscheibe (2018-11-26 22:47:48+00:00): Happy mapping :-)
driveassistant (2018-11-26 22:48:34+00:00): Gleichfalls :)
dikkeknodel (2018-07-15 19:45:36+00:00): Hi Voonosm,
I noticed you recently put the Fronalppass on the map with this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5417259116
Armchairmapping is very valuable, but cannot capture the same details as in the field. I supposed you figured the saddle/pass was near the guidepost with the same name. 
I was at Fronalppass today and noticed that your mapping is only off by about 60 m, good job :-). However, saddle and mountain pass are not necessarily at the same position, and here they are not. The pass is 61 m eastward along the path. The saddle is 56 m south east by east (in a 123 degree angle).
I would suggest to add a fixme="find exact position" to such an item when mapping from the armchair, so a mapper in the field sees there is still some improvement possible (OSMand for Android can show items with a fixme tag). 
I will update the positions today or tomorrow.
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-07-19 13:43:06+00:00): Done:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60748548
PT-53 (2019-11-09 14:56:29+00:00): Hallo bs-osm,
Du hast diesen Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561873154/history
mit disused=yes markiert.
Die korrekte Bezeochnung für einen aufgegebenen Weg wäre disused:highway=path
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-11-17 08:47:42+00:00): Hallo bs-osm, 
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-11-24 11:32:16+00:00): Hallo bs-osm,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-08 11:14:49+00:00): Hallo bs-osm,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
bs-osm (2019-12-10 20:33:38+00:00): ist geändert
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-17 17:51:44+00:00): Hi Janinsche80, welcome to OSM.

Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56425192
Janinsche80 (2018-02-17 19:45:05+00:00): Ok. Thank you for the information.
eggie (2018-02-16 21:13:33+00:00): Prima... niks mis mee.
eggie (2018-02-16 21:14:50+00:00): Wel moet je eigenlijk altijd aangeven source=kadaster pdok 2016 of survey. local knowledge kan ook, want je bent de plaatselijke mapper.
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-17 17:51:15+00:00): Hi Janinsche80, welcome to OSM.

Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56425927
DaveF (2018-02-17 00:39:55+00:00): Very disappointed you deleted my amendments to Cargo 1.
If you look at the images on the business's websites you'll notice the Cider Shop & WokyKo are *clearly* 2 units wide (out of a total of 11).

Using Bing imagery (the most up to date) you'll see it can't be that close to the centre line of Gaol Ferry Steps. You've plonked the building on top of some trees! (Notice those roundish blobs & the ones on the opposite side of the street!)
Please revert ASAP..
ndm (2018-02-17 09:51:28+00:00): Well, I was a bit disappointed too -- as I counted all the units very carefully on the ground.

Anyway, I'm going past today -- so will have a look at how many units each shop really has -- I'll stick a couple of photos on flickr / mapilliary so we can all see.

Have used latest Bing imagery for positioning -- should be in the correct position.
ndm (2018-02-17 09:53:19+00:00): Anyway rest of the realignment was a distinct improvement -- glad you deleted all the construction lines :-)
ndm (2018-02-17 19:14:59+00:00): Ok, you're right there are 11 front units, see https://www.flickr.com/photos/155435107@N06/39424835715/in/dateposted-public/

Looking a bit closer I think that the front of yours is probably correct, but units are too large and back extends too far (back of mine is correct). Also first and last units are only half depth.

Will revert and tweak as required later -- have a few other surveys to get mapped first.
stephankn (2018-03-17 09:52:18+00:00): why was way 504117425 not connected to the main road at the eastern end near the bridge?
user_5359 (2018-02-17 06:50:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question: Are you "only" user or developer of the tool "PlaceMakerOSMEditor"?
daniel tal (2018-02-19 15:19:45+00:00): Greetings. I am not programmer but in partnership with Dale, who created the tool. We are going to release it for free soon. It is for use with SketchUp (works with the older free versions). Are you interested in trying it?
Constable (2018-02-17 09:13:49+00:00): hi there, welcome to osm, please keep in mind that you're not editing your private map, you'r editing data which was added by other mappers, who did put some efforts and time into it.
I'm looking at your edits and this one looks not really appropriate https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=56426467
You did delete a temple with some proper tags just like religion, denomination and so on, and replaced it with a building=yes + name=*. If you thought the building shape was wrong you only had to update it's shape, not delete it and add it back with half of the info it had before.
The same works for some footways you deleted and added back. Problem is, the one you added are not connected to the rest of the road network, if I look at the map I cant understand hot to get on those footways now.
Constable (2018-02-17 09:26:06+00:00): Also, sections like this one don't have to be mapped this way, it's called indoor mapping, search it on the osm wiki please
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561884363
Raekasaer (2018-02-17 11:54:37+00:00): I didn't delete a temple and replace it with anything. There were 2 buildings where there should've been a single building. If you don't like my edit's I apologize, but I do live in this area, and based off of what I see both on the map, and walking around is how i've edited things. I took the footpaths away because in my head i didn't think of them as footpaths, but when I found the defenition of a footpath I realized my mistake and am in the process of replacing, as well as adding the rest of the footpaths including the section you think is indoors. It's actually not indoors, the David O. McKay building is mostly  outdoors, and they are more footpaths just through the bldg. 
As for making sure things are connected and whatnot, I'm not finished with it just yet. Still more to be added including sidewalks, so wait until I've completed it before you critisize.
Constable (2018-02-17 12:48:55+00:00): Hi there, thanks a lot for replying to my message. Well, we had some pokemon go related troubles here in the past months and I thought you were just another mapper editing stuff with no good reason, sorry for that if I was wrong, I'm not here to argue with other mappers, I'm here to cooperate with them.
Let's get back to business then: if you look here https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=56426467 you'll see some red, green, yellow and blue lines. Have a look at the temple area. According to it you deleted this temple https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287194916/history (look at the tags used to map it) and updated this other one with a more appropriate building tag value and a new name https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419247286 . Do you see the difference in tags used? the deleted one provided much more info than the second one (amenity, denomination, religion, operator) and I reckon it as a loss of data. Not a big deal, we've all messed up something on the map, we can easily restore that data if you can confirm those tags were appropriate.
If the McKay footpaths are not covered/indoor, well, well done, you chose the right tag.
I see you signed up a week ago, feel free to ask in case you reckon you need some help/tips.
Thanks for your efforts improving the map.
Cheers
Constable (2018-02-19 13:33:51+00:00): Hi there, we might need your local knowledge here. Do you mind having a look at this note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1222979 ?
I suspect that road has never existed.
Thanks
Raekasaer (2018-02-21 10:48:21+00:00): Hey Constable. So some info about me, Yes I did actually start on here because of Pokemon Go. The map on Pokemon Go one day popped up with our university flooded in water, and so I got on to see if I could fix it, but it already had. It just hasn't been updated on the game yet lol. But I did notice some things I needed to edit, and so I did, and I've enjoyed it. I do want the map to be as accurate as possible, so despite playing pokemon go I won't try to change things just for the benefit of the game. It'll be fun to work on this a little bit.

Also for your road, it does exist. I commented on the link as well. If you want to Private message me, I'm willing to get in contact with you so that I can send you photos of things on the ground as well so you can see how things are currently vs the out of date satellite images. Just let me know
Constable (2018-02-21 11:09:15+00:00): hi again, thanks for your help. If you're planning to improve this area by yourself I'm super fine with that and I'd be glad to let you and the local community do the whole work. I'm saying so because I'm just a mapper from Europe who found himself here because of some pokemon related vandalism.
Feel free to get in touch in case you feel like my help might be useful.
Thanks
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-17 17:50:53+00:00): Hi Janinsche80, welcome to OSM.

Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56426509
viloan (2018-02-16 21:42:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kempelen (2019-12-14 18:50:50+00:00): Szia!
Ez az "Épülő aluljáró" vajon már felépült és levehető a név?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561883333#map=19/47.97148/19.76932
kempelen (2019-12-14 18:51:24+00:00): Még egy van:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557368823
Alexander-II (2018-02-24 13:44:06+00:00): Hello.
What is the reason for massive retagging cooling towers from man_made=tower + tower:type=cooling to man_made=cooling_tower? Was there a discussion about it?
Alexander-II (2018-02-25 03:47:05+00:00): Написал мысли по этой правке в русскоязычной ветке форума https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=686829#p686829
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-17 17:50:08+00:00): Hi Janinsche80, welcome to OSM. 

Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=56426940
Jez Nicholson (2018-10-26 06:41:49+00:00): Hi,  Wind farms in the UK are being modelled as relations rather than polygons https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Renewable_energy_in_the_United_Kingdom  I've just turned Meikle Carewe into one. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63889631

Thanks for mapping it.

Regards,
              Jez
GinaroZ (2018-10-30 14:50:37+00:00): I think I did this copying another one which I saw mapped as a way. A shame that the site relation name is not rendered though. :(
Jez Nicholson (2018-10-30 16:42:00+00:00): take a look at https://openinframap.org/#15/57.01748/-2.27285 for work on rendering :)
viloan (2018-02-16 22:10:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
uvi (2018-03-14 16:12:12+00:00): hallo Handelt es sich hierbei um einen richigen Milchautomaten oder nur um eine Verkaufsstelle?
Kommen Waren aus dem Regal, ist m.E. zusätzlich shop=farm mit der description, welche Sachen es dort gibt, korrekt. Sobald ein Automat steht, sollte der doch so auch erscheinen und recherchierbar sein. Einige vertreten auch die Meinung, dass der Punkt mit shop=dairy ergänzt werden sollte. Ich denke, es empfiehlt sich folgendes Beispiel ganz gut: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264211545 .
Bist du ortskundig, kannst du dies ändern?
Gruß Uwe
mueschel (2018-02-18 12:48:09+00:00): Hi,
I found 23 POIs with rather strange tags, like this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5417428673

There are several keys that don't look like they should appear in OSM:
    City=High Level
    Province=Alberta
    Site_Name=High Level
    site_type=Scheduled Outreach

Could you check that?
Jan
Rps333 (2018-02-18 15:06:40+00:00): thanks. I will fix them
Arma IRM-ED (2020-11-30 01:51:52+00:00): Hi, Martin Sauter. I have added some bridges and adjusted this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/561896294) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
frenchie2017 (2018-02-18 02:06:06+00:00): Impressive work.  Way to go.
Hjart (2018-02-16 22:55:31+00:00): I have reverted this change because the imagery you used is old and misaligned.
Constable (2018-02-17 08:50:30+00:00): ciao, grazie per le modifiche in zona, ho visto che hai aggiunto alcune linee elettriche per tutta la valtellina.
Occhio però che questo tratto sono quasi certo sia una strada sterrata, non un sentiero.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561898310
gigi2037 (2018-02-18 20:55:25+00:00): Come detto guardando  le altre strade ho dedotto che fossero dello stesso tipo in mezzo a nulla dire  che una strada e stretta . Ciao
Constable (2018-02-18 21:25:24+00:00): ciao, aspetta, non capisco. Adesso quella strada è mappata come sentiero (path), quelle a fianco sono strade sterrate (track), tu non la hai mappata come quelle a fianco, i tag sono diversi.
abakus_uploader (2018-02-17 23:31:02+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-02-16 23:10:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 43555380, 43555853, 43557015, 43691323, 43691352, 43691923, 43692391, 43817135, 43817559, 43847066, 43875161.
woodpeck_repair (2018-02-16 23:41:44+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54685374, 55874749, 55874814, 55874836, 55874872, 55874958, 55874994, 55875011, 55875027, 55875086.
Alecs01 (2018-02-17 09:12:58+00:00): Same here, why delete object already existing to re-draw them? and you messed up the multipolygon which now covers both buildings
Constable (2018-02-17 09:38:06+00:00): here you did align nothing, you did replace some residential road sections with some more unclassified roads. It's not correct, those sections are clearly residential, 99% of the traffic passing through them is made up of residents
Constable (2018-02-17 09:38:34+00:00): *non resident
gostain (2018-12-20 11:52:41+00:00): Thank You So Much For the Help. https://router4.me/10-0-0-1/
rivermont (2019-07-30 00:01:56+00:00): Hi Friedrich,
I noticed a couple buildings tagged with `addr2:` and `addr3:`.
I'm not sure if these addresses should go on separate features or just enumerated within the regular `addr:` tag, but as far as I know no consumer will recognize these as addresses.
It seems to be the buildings contained in relation 1060497 (https://osm.org/relation/1060497) but I might have missed some.
Thanks,
Will
fkv (2019-07-30 03:22:58+00:00): This is the apartment complex where I live. The whole complex has the address Davidg. 76-80, while each of the individual buildings has up to 3 additional so-called Identadressen (identical addresses). The only way to map this correctly is by using the addrN schema which is already in wide use (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr2:housenumber) and documented in at least 3 proposals (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/AddrN, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/addr2, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/addrN). When consumers don't recognize these as addresses, it's due to badly missing software features. Nag them, write feature requests.
rivermont (2019-07-30 15:22:04+00:00): Great, thanks! I hadn't come across these before and they looked strange. The proposal looks quite useful, actually.
Alecs01 (2018-02-17 09:11:07+00:00): 2 problemi qua: non c'è motivo di cancellare e ridisegnare sempre tutto, e nemmeno di creare una relazione multipoligono, la fontana fa parte del parco, non vedo perchè escluderla.
user_5359 (2018-02-17 06:28:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-02-17 02:46:45+00:00): Essa via você deletou e na verdade existe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561915571/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
user_5359 (2018-02-17 06:42:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your change set comment isn't correct. The name was already in the last version ScanDisk! Please notice: DON'T mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-12 10:16:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 90789465 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism / fantasy mapping in Bangladesh.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1712 .  They have not edited for a while but problems with what they left was reported on IRC recently.
Constable (2018-02-17 18:24:41+00:00): hi there, thanks for contributing!
Watch out, those sidewalks are not connected to the rest of the road network, you should always connect them to the roads they cross, and you should also connect them to the roads where road crossing (zebra, traffic signal,...) are in place. Otherwise routing services won't recognize those trails/sidewalks.
You also mapped twice the curch, if you look at the map you'll see two crosses on the curch, that's because you added the amenity=place_of_worship tag twice, once on the building, once on the area. I'd remove the area, there's no need to have a religious are like that, I mean the parking is not used to pray, so the amenity=place of w. is not suitable for that area. Please also square that church building, select it and press "s" on your keyboard.
Thanks, feel free to get in touch by replying here if you need some help.
Cheers
carlotta4th (2018-02-21 05:16:53+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I'd heard varying reports on what should be done with sidewalks and I was never able to clarify what OSM's official stance on that was--do you happen to have a link? I'd love to verify this. =)

As for the church thing, that was from merging an existing point with an existing area, I actually didn't create either of them I was just trying to declutter the map with unnecessary double tags and didn't realize that even after the merge there was STILL a duplicate. XD The churches in this area were all marked up weird, but I'll give them a quick look over again and see if there's any further tidying I can do.

Thanks!
Constable (2018-02-21 08:16:06+00:00): hi there, thanks for your reply.
Looks to me like you did remove that duplicate "place of worship" tag and you also squared the church building, thanks, well done.
Have a look at the sidewalks wiki page if you want to find out more about them https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks

Here instead you can understand what I was referring to when I was talking about connecting sidewalks with the rest of the road network
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways
The sidewalks here near the church are still not connected to the roads they cross.
Thanks for your help!
Cheers