piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
portalaventura (2021-07-13 23:25:27+00:00): Por favor, verifica suas alterações e tenha mais cuidado ao fazer alinhamentos. Os seus alinhamentos estão excluindo informação do OSM. Isso está próximo da postura de um vandalo.

Por exemplo, você distorceu a geometria da Rua Bento Gonçalves. A Rua Senador Flôrencio agora está muito próxima das edificações. São só dois exemplo, outras ruas alterados por você excluiram informação, relativa a posição relativa das geometrias que representam o que está mapeado. A fonte citada no seu changeset não é compativel com a alterações realizadas.

Por favor, corrija os erros das suas edições.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107690428
LizardHeadPeak (2021-07-14 17:28:26+00:00): Portalaventura. Um membro de nossa equipe obterá os dados alinhados onde você especificou e outras áreas em breve. Obrigado por apontar esses problemas. 

Portalaventura. A member of our team will get the data in alignment where you specified and other areas soon. Thanks for pointing out these issues.
rskedgell (2021-07-09 09:58:59+00:00): Thanks. I've added the heritage tags from NHLE in changeset #107692732
StefanHRT (2021-07-09 10:08:14+00:00): Hello,
if this a footpath, please set bicycle=no at the path ore use directly footpath. thanks
robblner (2021-07-09 12:02:27+00:00): ok, done. Thanks for the hint.
StefanHRT (2021-07-09 13:04:49+00:00): thanks
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
Jose Luis Infante (2021-07-09 14:43:23+00:00): Hola,
si se trata de un camino privado pero transitable, no hay que eliminarlo. Se puede informar que el tipo de acceso es privado.
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107693638
user_3022894 (2021-07-27 20:15:33+00:00): Hallo Schrotleon,

der Spielplatz war, wie es aussieht bereits eingetragen gewesen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45292604

Und was soll das hier bitte sein: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2747407 ?

Genauso hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2584006
wir tragen nur real existierende Objekte ein. Das ist keine Spielweise hier.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
wwwFrank (2021-10-23 09:02:20+00:00): Die "Schule im Klinikum" befindet sich in der Jugend-Psychiatrie, also im Gebäude 45a.
Das Klinikum Lippe gibt die Adresse auf seiner Webseite fälschlicherweise mit 45 an. Ich habe die vor Jahren schon angeschrieben, keine Reaktion. Im Gebäude 45 befindet sich der Blutspendedienst des DRK.
Jose Luis Infante (2021-07-09 14:45:14+00:00): Hola,
si existe el camino es un error borrarlo por el hecho de que el acceso sea privado. Se debe dejar el camino e informar que el acceso es privado.
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107694921
chris-ca (2021-11-14 09:55:53+00:00): Hi Benedict! Nice to see a new mapper at work. You've already added many POIs in Zeze!

However, please be very careful to select the correct classification and tags when adding data to openstreetmap. If your app (maps.me) does not support the correct classification it is often better not add it.

In this and other changesets it seems like you added random houses in the village as "touristic viewpoint".

There are mainly 2 issues with that:
1) The houses are not a touristic viewpoint as specified by openstreetmap:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint

2) Do not map private information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information

Always keep in mind that all data  added to openstreetmap can be seen by anybody.

Please refer to https://help.openstreetmap.org/ for further questions.
PT-53 (2022-05-10 06:07:21+00:00): Hallo FloToHu,
für diesen "Pumptrack"
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962875304/history
wird im OSM-Inspector ein Hinweis "islands_bicycle" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=10.08551&lat=47.65301&zoom=18&opacity=0.34
und bei keep right mit "schwimmende Inseln":
- https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=98&error=130040309
- https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=98&error=130040308

Statt
highway=cycleway
sollte
leisure=track      mit
sport=cycling
verwendet werden.

Siehe:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/781738577
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=track?uselang=de
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:sport%3Dcycling

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße
FloToHu (2022-05-10 09:58:00+00:00): Hab's behoben. Track ist jetzt weg.
PT-53 (2022-05-10 10:24:53+00:00): Hallo FloToHu, 
warum hast D den Way jetzt gelöscht statt auf die richtigen Merkmale umzustellen?
FloToHu (2022-05-10 12:23:26+00:00): Darfst Du gerne selbst machen. Ich habe wegen Dir mit OSM aufgehört, weil Deine ständigen Korrekturen mir das Gefühl geben OSM nicht zu können und ich es scheinbar nie richtig machen kann - außer ich kann es mit 1000 Links belegen wieso ich etwas speziell gemapped habe.
Daher ist für mich löschen der leichteste Weg das zu beheben und da Du eh alles besser kannst, korrigiere es doch einfach selbst, wenn Du wieder etwas von mir finden solltest.
PT-53 (2022-05-10 12:29:22+00:00): Ach FloToHu,
jeder macht mal Fehler. Das ist doch kein Problem. 
Aus Fehlern kann man auch lernen. Deshalb habe ich Dich über Fehler informiert und aufgezeigt, wie man es richtig macht. Du scheinst aber nicht lernwillig oder lernfähig zu sein.
Schade
alix_geovelo (2021-11-04 14:45:27+00:00): Bonjour Mathias_ADAV

Un utilisateur Geovelo nous signale (début septembre) que la rue est en bande cyclable de chaque côté.
(https://www.amenagements-cyclables.fr/fr/contributions/24222)

Peut-être que l'aménagement temporaire à été annulé pour remettre l'aménagement précédent ? (bande cyclable de chaque côté)
Si vous avez des précisions à nous apporter, nous sommes à l'écoute :)

Cyclablement,
Alix de Geovelo
martinst (2022-02-22 17:27:28+00:00): Würde access=private bei der Griesberg-Alm nicht besser passen?
BCNorwich (2021-07-11 07:24:08+00:00): Hi, Please be more careful,  you have tagged some long sections of highways as bridges.
ravali_78 (2021-07-12 06:59:53+00:00): Hi ErrolKim,
I have fixed the classification from footway to residential and fixed the alignment as building polygon overlapping with residential road.Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107814375.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107695772
maro21 (2021-07-19 23:22:02+00:00): Jak zamyka się sklep, restauracja lub inny lokal, to nie usuwamy punktu, tylko dajemy przedrostek "disused:" do głównych tagów lub zmieniamy na shop=vacant. W ten sposób zachowujemy historię obiektu, a czasem też inne tagi, np. wheelchair=* będzie taki sam, gdy otworzy się nowy lokal. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Zachowaj_histori.C4.99
W tym przypadku sam niedługo po usunięciu dodałeś nowy lokal.
iWowik (2021-07-10 07:56:45+00:00): День добрый!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241812256/history
Прудная это что?
Прудная аллея, Прудная набережная или Прудная площадь? А может Прудная линия?

Соблюдайте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о наименовании улиц.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
Jose Luis Infante (2021-07-09 14:47:54+00:00): Hola,
realmente es extraño indicar restricciones de giro en pistas. Además has desconectado las pistas. ¿Qué quieres indicar? Así puedo decirte cuál es la mejor forma de hacerlo.
Un saludo!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107699416
DressyPear4 (2021-07-09 14:52:45+00:00): Olá, não há necessidade de adicionar cada acesso à residência, calçadas não devem ser grudadas nas edificações.
Modere no tamanho das geometrias e na quantidade de praças.
Adicione apenas o que existe!
Vinber-Pro (2021-07-09 15:42:04+00:00): Erreur de syntax sur les horaires, attentions :) Ne pas oublier https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107702204
Vinber-Pro (2021-07-09 15:43:07+00:00): attention erreur de syntax également ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107702689
starsep (2021-07-09 13:35:38+00:00): Dzięki za pierwszą edycję! Poprawiłem tagowanie w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107707462
Diana IRM-ED (2023-01-13 07:45:30+00:00): Hello gunnar1m,
Your edit looks awesome, I'd like to inform you that I found this railway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/962911819) has crossing issues with 2 railway : (1) rail id (106102095) at coordinates (17.4709849, 96.5195204) and (2) rail id(195818021) at coordinates(17.4934038, 96.5259004) and waterway. What i want to ask you, are there really 3 train lines there?

If you have any other suggestion please let me know.
Thank you for your understanding. Happy mapping ^^
gunnar1m (2023-01-13 08:23:33+00:00): There are two Tracks. I change it.
Diana IRM-ED (2023-01-13 09:26:01+00:00): Thank you
Komadinovic Vanja (2021-07-21 07:00:12+00:00): Pozdrav Dujo,

Krenuo sam u validaciju importa pa gledam duplikate, poste bez ref i tako to.

Naišao sam na poštu u Bačkim Vinogradima https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8907245548 , malo niže u mestu postoji druga pošta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875538755 . Deluje da je jedna duplikat?
Duja (2021-07-21 07:10:50+00:00): Jeste, i to ova moja. Sredio sam maločas kroz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108350778 .
ovruni (2021-07-09 17:02:35+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado el valor de concreto a una calle con asfalto, de la misma forma he notado que en varias de sus conjuntos anteriores se han agregado asfalta a veredas que son de concreto. Por favor revise la documentación sobre superficies https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:surface
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
ovruni (2021-07-09 16:59:44+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha ingresado sidewalk=both a varias vías que no contienen veredas a ambos lados, por lo que le he retirado el varlo. Por favor revise la documentación sobre esta etiqueta
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
Luis Raul Osorio Muñoz (2021-07-09 17:06:21+00:00): Buenas, no entiendo la observacion esas vias si tienen acera en ambos lados. Yo vivo por la zona y fui hace un dia a revisar. Sugiero corrobar si se va a observar ese tipo de cosas. Ay cosas que no se puede saber como los caminos de los cerros por ser peligrosos. Pero esas calles si contienen la información descrita
ovruni (2021-07-09 17:12:17+00:00): Desde las imágenes aereas se puede observar que estas vías cerca a la intersección no tienen aceras ambos lados, no hace falta vivir en la zona para notarlos. Aquí algunas de las vías 893138553, 893138554, 893138555
Saludos
dzidek23 (2021-07-12 13:38:27+00:00): I think your amendments to the Boongate street are factually correct. However, I wouldn't like to see walkers choosing Boongate over designated footpaths to either side of this street. Boongate bridge is no place for pedestrians nor cyclists (even if there is no sign preventing them to use it). Would you agree to revert the change?
Mike Baggaley (2021-07-12 13:51:47+00:00): Walkers will decide for themselves whether to walk along the adjacent paths. For those who build maps without sidewalks there will be no available route if foot=no is specified. Any walking router should be able to choose a footpath in preference to a road. I agree that it would be helpful if there was a tag to say "not recommended", however, this is subjective and one person's dangerous route could be one that others are quite happy to use. I am therefore against reverting the change.
kartonage (2021-07-09 18:56:34+00:00): Hej,

these trails have been marked "access=no" which means that access is not permitted. Therefore deletion is not required nor wanted. People will always map things back regardless of permission if they are present. OpenStreetMap includes all things that can be mapped, which include private or inaccessible objects. Instead of information about the non-permissable state of these trails there is now no information at all. People might confuse this as an invitation or map it as accessible all over again.

So please don't delete valid objects if they are actually present on the ground. It's always best to actually improve things than to just delete it. There is not improvement in this changeset.

Best regards
Chris Durand (2021-07-09 19:12:45+00:00): The problem is that these trails are not supposed to be there and should be left to naturalize. Their presence on the map is an invitation to use them and unfortunately people ignore the signage. The Conservation Authority manages this property on behalf of the County and these "extra" trails are not in the management plan so their removal from this dataset is indeed an improvement in the interest of conservation of this natural area.
Chris Durand (2021-07-09 19:32:08+00:00): Further to this, the open street data is being consumed by other cycling "apps" where these trails are being promoted as accessible. This is how we became aware of this because users of the trails indicated where they obtained the information. Unfortunately, information can be a dangerous thing and in this case is causing environmental damage and even financial loss.
kartonage (2021-07-10 10:58:37+00:00): If you have problems with certain apps, report it to them. Access tags are there for a reason.
I can only reiterate what I have already said. If trails exist on the ground they should and will be mapped. Feel free to inform yourself about access tagging and all around best practices in OpenStreetMap.

Having no information at all never helps anyone.
DominikGM (2022-01-05 18:17:46+00:00): Hallo ReDav,

hast du aus Versehen bei diesem Kreisverkehr den Tag "oneway" zu "oneway=no" geändert?
Oder wie kann es sein, dass hier Fahrzeuge in beide Richtungen fahren können?
DominikGM (2022-01-19 17:02:29+00:00): Danke ReDav für deine nette Antwort (Direktnachricht) und dass du es in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116233684 schon geändert hast :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
maraf24 (2021-07-28 09:57:29+00:00): Te zmiany zostały wycofane.
Komadinovic Vanja (2025-02-01 23:10:14+00:00): Hej hej vezano za ovo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3176694507 . Dodat je brand "Sale", neki finski lanac prodavnica, pa samo da potvrdim da je greska.

Pozdrav,
Vanja
Duja (2025-02-12 00:28:38+00:00): Jeste greška, verovatno mi je iD ponudio preset pa ja kliknuo.
pantufla (2023-11-08 07:52:27+00:00): Wilmer, esta vía: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271921930/history

No es asfaltada. Es principalmente de tierra. Lo corrijo a "unpaved"
pantufla (2023-11-08 07:54:08+00:00): Y no sé si debería ser tertiary, es revisable? es poco transitada y muy mala.  Aquí un ejemplo: https://youtu.be/kS3zbAPZlfw?si=zZBMtxGbbWE_Sxj_&t=1035
4004 (2021-07-09 19:47:30+00:00): это нарочь?
Rico557 (2021-07-12 12:59:15+00:00): Тут когда-то были овощной и лотерейный киоски(видны в мапилари). Их надо будет скрыть.
4004 (2021-07-12 13:27:23+00:00): ах эти, как то затупил, не посмотрел снимки за 2018 год
StC (2021-07-10 20:40:04+00:00): Hi,

apparently you have broken relation Halage du Canal de Nantes à Brest with this changeset.

You might want to switch to JOSM for dealing with large relations, because with ID you'll break lots of things.

St.
Vinber-Pro (2021-07-09 14:13:41+00:00): Bonjour,
je vois que tu parles du nom de la localisation, ce n'est pas vraiment le nom du wifi donc ? Je ne suis pas sur de comprendre pour quelle raison tu ajoutes ce "nom" ?
à plus
miguel111 (2021-07-10 14:21:16+00:00): Asi by som "Bývala mliekareň" vymazal, ak sa budova nevyužíva. Ide o súčasný stav, súčasne využitie budovy. Čo tam bolo, tak bolo.
mueschel (2021-07-10 09:07:35+00:00): Hi,
you used some monitoring tags here that are not used in other places.
E.g. monitoring:Nitrous_Oxide isn't used, but there are several "monitoring:air_quality:NO" already:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/monitoring%3Aair_quality#similar

Could you have a look and change these to tags already used somewhere?

Thanks!
TheSwavu (2021-07-10 00:29:52+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM. Roads that appear in OSM do not have to be public. If you find roads on OSM that are not public you can label them as being private by adding an access tag. See this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107730070 for an example. 

Please don't delete other mapper's work just because it doesn't appear in an "official" database.

Thanks.
dieterdreist (2021-07-30 16:41:20+00:00): Hi, I have noticed you downgraded this unclassified road to track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/957977292#map=13/13.5974/4.2020&layers=N
From looking at the map it seems to be the main connection locally, for me this is at least unclassified.
sandroz (2021-07-17 13:19:59+00:00): Доброго дня! Навіщо були поломані правильно нанесені мультиполігони в місті Ізяслав?
selb (2021-07-17 13:41:23+00:00): Добрий день.
З метою спрощення. Як на мене, то позначати окремі квартали (з обходом/виключенням доріг) житловими зонами — маячня. Замість одного умовно квадратного полігону маємо 100 окремих ліній звʼязаних у мультиполігон.
Заміняв закінчені території. Що саме зламав?
selb (2021-07-17 13:47:44+00:00): Полігони наносив по наявних точках ліній.
sandroz (2021-07-17 14:18:41+00:00): Дороги не відносятся до житлових кварталів тому їх відокремлюють окремо.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential
sandroz (2021-07-17 14:22:06+00:00): Мультиполігон і так є спрощення, замість двох ліній з тегами мапится одна.
selb (2021-07-17 14:35:58+00:00): Добре. Зрозумів. Вибачте.
VARVAR8 (2021-07-18 12:04:50+00:00): selb. В нас прийнято видалення обговорювати зі спільнотою. Якщо ти ще не влився, можеш не ображатися потім що стосовно тебе поступили аналогічно (видаливши роботу без попереджень)!!
VARVAR8 (2021-07-18 12:08:55+00:00): "З метою спрощення..?" А не промайнула думка що задовго до вас це хтось створював, потративши на це багато часу?
phodgkin (2021-07-18 14:04:31+00:00): I'm just reverting the removal of orienteering information
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Orienteering
I noticed in Durham area. If unsure of purpose of tags, please don't remove!
Friendly_Ghost (2021-07-18 17:04:00+00:00): My apologies for removing the information and thank you for restoring it. As you can read from my changeset comment, removing information wasn't part of the plan.
Sunset2001 (2021-07-10 09:54:55+00:00): Ciao, per quanto ci siano persone che percorrono questo tratto a piedi, mi pare che questa specifica sezione sia riservata alle solo biciclette (almeno a giudicare dalla segnaletica orizzontale)
Ettore Io (2021-07-11 17:47:32+00:00): Intanto volevo ringraziarti per avere controllato il mio cambiamento, è bello sapere che se qulacuno sbaglia a fare una modofica ci sarà qualcuno che se ne accorge.
Per quanto riguarda il passaggio  a piedi, la cilopedonale Gino Bartali l'ho sempre considerata ciclopedonale in tutto il suo percorso, ma appena ci passo ricontrollerò la segnaletica; di sicuro ci passano tutti, anche perchè chi arriva dal passaggio pedonale di via Agadir se la trova proprio davanti.
Il problema che volevo risolvere è il fatto che pianificando un percorso a piedi su Komoot (usa open street map come mappa) non permettesse il passaggio a piedi dalla sbarra quando invece è possibile farlo; se non sulla ciclabile almeno sul marciapiede opposto.
Il problema dovrebbe comunque essere risolto dal fatto che ho anche tolto il tag "privato" dal tratto di via agadir in prossimità della sbarra.
MxxCon (2021-07-10 04:26:51+00:00): Hello.
This night club doesn't occupy the whole building, only basement. Therefore it's inappropriate to tag it as such.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107709460
patpol4 (2021-07-12 09:09:23+00:00): Czym jest barrier=log+ ?
Mazovian_Guide (2021-07-17 21:43:10+00:00): Droga jest zaklejona taśmą i dodatkowo leży tam drzewo, które uniemożliwia przejazd
Tomas Straupis (2021-07-10 12:57:20+00:00): Merkinės bokšto buvo gera pozicija, nuotrauka šiek tiek iš šono daryta, todėl bokšto viršus nėra ten, kur yra bokšto pagrindas.
manojkmohan (2021-07-12 10:12:18+00:00): തോന്നിയപോലെ വരച്ചിരിക്കുന്ന റോഡ്
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107711275
Viki_travel_weak (2021-07-09 15:42:40+00:00): Other legal sources for editing used in the josm based sources: 'Strava cycling and running heatmap', 'TIGER Roads 2020', 'U.S. Forest Roads Overlay', 'osm imagery based'.
manojkmohan (2021-07-12 10:10:51+00:00): തോന്നിയപോലെ വരച്ചിരിക്കുന്ന റോഡ്
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107711564
ZLima12 (2021-10-25 22:50:39+00:00): It looks like you drew a service road on top of a cycleway (old NSP). This does not make sense.
GinaroZ (2022-10-31 12:58:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3056871
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2694833238/history is this meant to be a Sunday collection?
LonMcGregor (2022-11-01 12:17:34+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128342876