piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DressyPear4 (2021-09-21 03:13:52+00:00): Olá, essa área https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235481228
já estava definida como park, por que criar uma nova https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985369680
por cima da existente?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111470608
DressyPear4 (2021-09-21 03:16:09+00:00): Isso não seria um estacionamento ao invés de park?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111470716
andrey®️ (2021-09-21 14:48:33+00:00): Esta é a Praça Cidade do Porto. É pequena e discreta, faz parte do conjunto de uma das portarias de acesso ao parque das mangabeiras.
ovruni (2021-09-21 01:23:55+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios nuevamente se han agregando usos de suelo colindantes, con un texto "CARLOS". Por favor revise el comentario en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111470534
SekeRob (2021-09-21 13:13:02+00:00): Hi,

The suggestion by someone who knows the OSM workings in depth is, that Flixbus might want to change to just navigating by GPS and only map the bus stops and order them.... why else have a navigation program, ideally one that's connected to the traffic information channel, my OSM based Nav is ,? These overlong route relations are very taxing on system and editor. How sequences change when only splitting ways to be able to get the turn lane info in over the correct sections is a riddle to me. Don't tell me if you split ways, the 'new' part goes to  the end of the route. If I knew how/why I would handle it, but now I only check if a way part had a route relation and still has afterwards. If it's broke then the error reports flag this, but route order they don't and loading a 2500+ member route is a disaster in iD which is the only editor I will use. Most often trying results in a 'error... took too long'

cheers
WoodWoseWulf (2021-09-22 00:27:43+00:00): Hi Sam,

You've named this mapped tennis court "Basketball Courts" - which one is it? Or is it both?

Also, the name tag should generally be reserved from place/feature names rather than descriptions, leisure=pitch and sport=* is the correct place to nominate the sport here.
kalupner (2021-09-21 08:25:16+00:00): Welche Verbesserung sind hier entstanden ?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111470844
Ich sehe z. B. das sich jetzt Landflächen
überschneiden!
Bitte korrigieren
TheSwavu (2021-09-21 08:30:30+00:00): You edits look all OK.

Thank you for your contribution.
jcarlson (2021-09-24 02:11:18+00:00): Nice additions! Just watch out, it looks like one of the sidewalks snapped to a boundary feature. Unless you're actually meaning to edit boundaries, it's usually best to go into iD's settings and uncheck the box so that those features don't display. Other than that, it all looks great!
WoodWoseWulf (2021-09-22 00:15:53+00:00): Hi jch011,

These shapes appear to be somewhat random, and the names don't really make sense.

What source are you using for these features?
DressyPear4 (2021-09-21 03:27:03+00:00): Olá, a tag place refere-se apenas para local (geografia) e não edificações.
Dados pessoais não devem ser adicionados no mapa, considerando que esses tornam-se públicos.
Adicione um comentário nas edições para que outros entendam o que você está editando,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Farei as correções novamente, da próxima irei pedir bloqueio de usuário.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111471616
DressyPear4 (2021-09-21 03:33:51+00:00): Talvez esse mapa sirva pra você
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/
nevw (2021-09-21 04:07:23+00:00): Hi
You have added a tunnel to the entire length of the way. You need to instead split the way at each end of the tunnel and add the tag to just the tunnel part.
Michael_Clarke (2021-09-21 06:16:10+00:00): Thanks, I was using the iD editor and don't see an option to split. I'll return it to how it was and have a look at some of the other available editors.
nevw (2021-09-21 06:26:32+00:00): Hi
Am not familiar with the iD editor but I think you need to add a node at each end of the tunnel then select the node and a scissors icon will be pop up and using that splits the line.
houston_mapper1 (2021-09-23 02:08:46+00:00): thank you for taking the time to finally fix this lake.
mapman44 (2021-09-23 02:25:17+00:00): You are welcome!
habi (2021-09-22 19:57:59+00:00): Ciao Pan
I came by your changesets due to https://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries&country=Switzerland :)
Would you mind putting 'real' changeset comments into what you do?
The last few days you're only mentioning "Orsières adresses",  but only touching forests.
Greetings from Bern,
habi
ScottWalkerAU (2021-09-21 04:53:57+00:00): Hi - you marked the water crossing as a ford when from aerial imagery it looks like a bridge. Is this correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111473745
jaimex2 (2021-09-21 05:16:13+00:00): A bridge would be more correct, thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111473745
aceman444 (2022-07-10 08:40:37+00:00): Zdravim, office=coworking asi nebude spravne znacenie pre organizacne jednotky firmy (Hagard).
ovruni (2021-09-21 05:30:05+00:00): He revertido este conjunto de cambios, por favor revise los comentarios anteriores sobre los centros de salud. http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12178847
Mathias_ADAV (2023-04-19 14:42:00+00:00): Bonjour,
la rue Charles Saint Venant est aménagée avec des bandes cyclables : cycleway = lane et non des pistes cyclables cycleway = track. Je viens de faire la modifications. Merci de vous référer au wiki concernant les aménagements cyclables : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

Bon mapping !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
user_3716049 (2021-09-25 20:15:15+00:00): Hi jimmyhendrix,
wie auf dem Foto unten zu sehen haben die Radstellen auch Werkzeug (service:bicycle:tools = yes)
https://www.meine-woche.de/staedte/moenchengladbach/meine-heimat/erste-radservicestation-in-moenchengladbach-nimmt-betrieb-auf_aid-62815533

MfG Kelso
jimmyhendrix (2021-09-26 08:35:32+00:00): Hallo Kelso,
besten Dank für den Hinweis. Habe das Tag ergänzt.
Viele Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Strubbl (2021-09-21 17:45:52+00:00): Hallo streetworker, bist du sicher, dass das Hotel "3c" heißt? Dies ist doch die Hausnummer und nicht der Name?
SekeRob (2021-09-21 06:36:29+00:00): Construction site behind Via Misticone, unknown when started, when thought to be complete.
Strubbl (2021-09-21 17:45:51+00:00): Hi streetworker, wieso hast du diesen Fußgängerüberweg als Fußgängerüberweg, der markiert ist gemappt? Ich kann keinerlei Markierungen feststellen. z.B. hier:
https://kartaview.org/details/3838673/20918/track-info
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
tux67 (2021-09-21 13:48:47+00:00): Hallo TomThom69
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Ist die Wegführung hier geändert und der ursprünglich geradeaus verlaufende Feldweg geht jetzt an dem Neubaugelände vorbei? Die alte Straße ganz weg?

Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111477784
tux67 (2021-09-21 13:52:22+00:00): P.S.: Da die von dir gemappten Informationen nicht so ganz einfach aus dem automatisch von iD als Quelle referenzierten Luftbild zu erkennen sind, du solltest du beim Upload bitte immer deine sonstigen Quellen mit angeben ..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Wenn du das vor Ort gesehen hast reicht "local knowledge" oder "survey".
Ansonsten:
Bei OSM sollten die genutzen Quellen offen, lizenzkompatibel und für alle anderen Mapper nachvollziehbar sein.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#.C3.9Cberpr.C3.BCfbarkeit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111477784
TomThom69 (2021-09-22 05:22:26+00:00): - Frage: "Ist die Wegführung hier geändert und der ursprünglich geradeaus verlaufende Feldweg geht jetzt an dem Neubaugelände vorbei? Die alte Straße ganz weg?"
Aw: Ja, der alte Weg ist zurück und ein neuer Weg um das Gelände gebaut worden. Quelle: Straßenbaulastträger
tux67 (2021-09-22 06:37:57+00:00): ok, dann hab' ich jetzt noch die an dieser Stelle genutzten umschließenden landuse=highway nachgezogen. 
Zur Info, was die Quelle angeht:
Bei OSM sollten die genutzen Quellen offen, lizenzkompatibel und für  andere Mapper nachvollziehbar sein.
Die Daten sollten auf Basis einer OSM kompatiblen Lizenz zur Verfügung gestellt werden.
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms#Rights_Granted

Gruß
tux67
MxxCon (2021-09-21 23:32:56+00:00): Hey, NYMM, go read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator:type what that tag means! This is not a public. This is a private doc office.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111477830
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:47:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
RaccoonFederation (2022-05-01 12:52:33+00:00): Hi PP, 
There's a node (9105152268) with the name (Discesa a mare con scale alla fine) which I don't understand. 
I've deleted the way because the path is permanently blocked and overgrown but not sure what to do with the node, it if has any meaning
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Akkurator (2023-01-26 00:46:14+00:00): Hallo GittaS,
sind diese beiden Neubauten inzwischen fertiggestellt?
Grüße,
Akkurator
Tomas Straupis (2021-09-21 10:14:01+00:00): Visgi bažnyčia gal nėra restoranas :-)
marczoutendijk (2021-12-09 20:26:01+00:00): Hi,
What do you mean by this nonsense:
"highway=servicehighway=track name=Etgenweg surface=grass tracktype=grade3"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128746268
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/985437550
regards,
marc
_klaas_ (2021-12-10 06:41:52+00:00): Thanks for the hint. Seems to be a copy/paste failure.
Tomas Straupis (2021-09-21 10:15:33+00:00): Nereikia naikinti viso pastato žymų. Restoranas - mažiukas elementas - galima pridėti esamo pastato viduje tašką ir jau tam taškui duoti restorano žymas.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
EräsHenkilö (2021-09-21 19:44:20+00:00): highway=track on tarkoitettu teille, ei kuntopoluille; aiempi tagaus oli oikeampi.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:Tag:highway=track?uselang=fi
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-09-21 18:59:52+00:00): Dag Frieteboer 

Tip
The tag leisure=swimming_pool should only be used for the water area of the swimming pool. A facility containing one or more swimming pools (mainly focused on swimming as a sport) should be tagged leisure=sports_centre + sport=swimming. 

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-21 19:01:33+00:00): Ik heb het (conform bovenstaande) even aangepast.
MVG
eggie
Frieteboer (2021-09-22 13:55:57+00:00): OK bedankt, ik heb alleen de naam veranderd, dus dat heeft degene voor mij fout gedaan, lijkt me...
eggie (2021-09-22 14:04:08+00:00): Hoi..Het zal niet eens fout zijn geweest.. maar de wiki wordt doorlopend aangepast door voortschrijdend inzicht.
Het rendert nu als zwembadinstelling.
Mapse
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
literan (2021-09-21 18:40:51+00:00): поле name - для имен собственных, у стрелок их не бывает. Для номеров - тег ref. Исправлю
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
user_12625593 (2021-09-21 11:37:49+00:00): Reverted by changeset 111491763
user_12625593 (2021-09-21 11:38:48+00:00): Beste, het toevoegen van een niet bestaand café wordt beschouwd als vandalisme. Ik heb de wijzigingen daarom teruggedraaid.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.