piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-12-07 23:03:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Ik heb amenity=restaurant toegevoegd.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
dieterdreist (2023-01-17 16:17:40+00:00): Hi, this is clearly a mechanical edit, can you explain why you removed the site_type tag? Adding a new tag is one thing (although to do it in a mechanical edit it must follow the guidelines), but removing a tag is a completely different thing. How will this continue? A month has passed an nothing has happened, neither have the rest of the site_type objects been retagged, nor was a discussion initiated how to fix the mess. Until now it is just as always, someone (with probably the best intentions) invents a new tag to replace an existing tag, typically for the sake of "consistency", and the result is not a transition to the new tag but a mess because now there are two tags used to tag the same thing. Can you please revert these edits or start a discussion about a process how to fix the mess? Thank you,
cheers,
Martin
b-unicycling (2023-01-18 00:00:43+00:00): site_type is a deprecated key for archaeological sites: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:site_type
That's all I have to say.
dieterdreist (2023-01-18 07:07:04+00:00): That’s clearly not sufficient to remove thousands of it on a global scale…
jimkats (2022-12-18 17:02:55+00:00): Γιατί επανέφερες την ονομασία "Διακλάδωση Στέρνας" στο δρόμο Άργους-Στέρνας; Πουθενά δεν έχω βρει ονομασία "διακλάδωση τάδε" για τέτοιους δρόμους.
JayCBR (2022-12-20 20:01:50+00:00): για τον ίδιο λόγο που ονομάζουμε παράπλευρες οδούς και συνδετήριες οδούς έτσι (πρακτικότητα και ομοιομορφία), δεν μπορώ όταν βλέπω name=παράδρομος. Ανώνυμες οδοί που καταλήγουν σε έναν προορισμό έχει νόημα να λέγονται έτσι και όχι "προς τάδε" που έχω δει κατα καιρούς (το πιο συχνό παράδειγμα είναι ορεινά χωριά που δεν υπάρχει άλλος δρόμος)
Kai Johnson (2023-01-15 22:31:48+00:00): Hi! I noticed you made some changes to the road through Davies Valley in the Jacumba Wilderness Area. I didn't understand some of the changes, but the situation out there is very unusual (in real life, regardless of what's on the map) so I wanted to check in with you to make sure we're on the same page.

I saw that you put in some turn restrictions. What prompted you to add those?
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-09 13:01:17+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
archpdx (2022-12-08 21:35:36+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please note that we don't use the name tag to describe features in OSM (see https://wiki.osm.org/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). For example, the retail area you mapped here with the name 'Bank' (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1120226545) should have its name removed.

Also, please note that only parks should be mapped as a park (not just any publicly accessible/green space, see https://wiki.osm.org/Tag:leisure=park). Please either remove the two parks you added or use more appropriate tags for these features. If you're unsure what tags to use, consider asking the forum (https://community.osm.org/c/71).

In the future, please use more meaningful changeset comments: "Assignment 2" does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. You can read more about what makes a good changeset comment here (https://wiki.osm.org/Good_changeset_comments)
Wjconrad (2024-01-19 00:00:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9576085648
This node appears to have been moved by mistake, there's no LDS distribution center on Jamestown.
Andrew Matheny (2024-01-19 00:08:09+00:00): Looks like I accidentally dragged in the browser editor - it was originally in the back of the Dallas Texas Temple.

I’ve moved it back. Thanks!
DressyPear4 (2022-12-13 16:12:40+00:00): Olá, a tag building corresponde apenas ao contorno da edificação e não a área toda do lote.
Há um campo específico para adicionar os números (addr:housenumber), não é correto colocar no lugar dos nomes.
Também é correto colocar apenas um ponto em cada lote para representar o endereço.
Você pode ver esse exemplo em Joinville
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-26.28274/-48.80624
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129839973
fititnt (2022-12-30 19:00:53+00:00): Eu acho que ele não apreendeu ainda a ler os comentários em changesets
JAILTON OLIVEIRA CUNHA (2022-12-30 19:27:48+00:00): Os lotes que não estão construídos serão,muito limitado o espaço.Inclusive constroem em qualquer área útil possível
fititnt (2022-12-31 16:20:41+00:00): Jailton, voce não quer entrar no canal da comunidade no telegram para conversarmos lá? O link é https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade .

Uma outra coisa que você está fazendo que é incomum é criar um changeset para CADA funcionalidade que altera em fez de agrupar.
Russ (2023-01-11 13:12:37+00:00): Hi,

Can I ask which data sources you used for this edit? Given that you've been improving the route of older power cables, it's presumably not just Bing. There isn't much public information on these routes which is legally acceptable to add to OSM.
ovruni (2022-12-08 00:57:19+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado varios edificios divididos, sin embargo estas divisiones no parecen visibles desde las imagenes aereas.
Saludos
daperson (2022-12-08 01:35:58+00:00): Primero: Me fijo en todos los satelites disponibles para hacer varios de mis cambios
Segundo: es conocido que en esta zona las casas son bastante cortas, teniendo solo 2 ventanas; una parte de mi familia vive aca y lo sabe, y tambien yo mismo fui a la zona varias veces y recuerdo que asi son varias de esas casas.
daperson (2022-12-08 01:38:45+00:00): *Primero: en zonas de alta reelevancia como el callao reviso varios mapas para encontrar posibles edificios que de otra forma no encontraria, se muy bien de esto porque cuando hay edificios altos, suelen ser los otros edificios cortos lo que suelen ser opacados; esta es de las principales razones por la cual prefiero mapear en pangoa antes que en el callao y por la cual necesitamos de una vez el ign, donde el efecto de las sombras en estructuras altas es inexistente.
ovruni (2022-12-08 01:42:03+00:00): Hola, como he mencionado en reiteradas ocasiones, no podemos usar fuentes de las cuales no tenemos un permiso expreso, actualmente tenemos la imagen de Esri aclarada para esta zona.
Saludos
Robert Whittaker (2023-02-03 15:28:53+00:00): Can I check if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230878776 has really changed from a Tesco Express to a Londis? It's odd, as there's another Londis store just next door at the Petrol station: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10058580419 .

If https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230878776 is now a Londis, then the brand tags could do with being updated.
Russ McD (2023-02-04 02:01:01+00:00): Hi Robert - Yeah my mistake.  I think a casualty of editing on the move in OsmAnd & picking the wrong item to edit.  
I'm in Thailand now busily changing the "Tesco Lotus" shops to "Lotus's" as and when I pass them .... and the phone spellcheck really does  seem to prefer "Londis" over the confusing grammar used in the new Thai branding.
Have corrected the mistake now & thanks for bringing to my attention.
ovruni (2022-12-08 00:59:14+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios de manera similar al conjunto de cambios 129840228 se agregan divisiones de edificios que no parecen ser visibles.
Saludos
archpdx (2022-12-08 21:38:38+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please note that the park feature type should only be used for parks. There should be a separate feature type for grass.
mrpulley (2025-01-06 12:39:27+00:00): Maxspeed likely correct - maxspeed not specifically signposted, but comes off a road with a 100 zone.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-02 15:12:39+00:00): why you deleted this houses? https://osmcha.org/changesets/129841403/
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-02 15:13:34+00:00): ah, you added again, sorry
DUGA (2024-12-26 14:49:23+00:00): Read this before edit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:charge
ovruni (2022-12-08 02:28:56+00:00): Hola, hay varios sidewalks que estan sobre areas que son cruces de vias.
ovruni (2022-12-08 02:30:06+00:00): Quiero decir cruces de peatones, tampoco se han agregado los pasos de peatones de estos cruces con las calles
ovruni (2022-12-08 03:34:27+00:00): Hola, el uso de la etiqueta de nombre se encuentra destinado solo para agregar nombres, no para agregar otro tipo de descripciones. [0]
Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
ovruni (2022-12-08 03:38:53+00:00): Hola, en sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado edificios sobre otros edificios existentes, por lo que he revertido su conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
mueschel (2022-12-24 14:37:09+00:00): Hi,
what does 'poled' mean? trailblazed?
MaxL (2022-12-24 21:30:26+00:00): Same but different.

Both indicate the line of a track but blazing can only be seen when close by, so indicates that you are on the correct path. Poles can be seen from a distance so are used when the path is not visible on the ground.
mueschel (2022-12-25 09:40:04+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. I think this case is included in trailblazed=poles. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Atrailblazed
MaxL (2022-12-26 06:53:37+00:00): Change as per your suggestion
Warin61 (2022-12-09 01:28:44+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM. 
Some problems? name should be for the name only - not a description. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only. Additional the name should be in the local language. 
Deleting way 768112873 has broken 3 relations... 
For these and a few other reasons this changeset has been reverted.
Warin61 (2022-12-09 01:36:30+00:00): Hi
The tag building=* should only be on a building, not on an area that contains buildings.
真中あお (2025-12-25 10:47:49+00:00): 	
您好，这个变更集中对汤家桥社区居委会的编辑有一些小问题：
iD编辑器默认其建筑，但该办公地不是单体建筑，那么需要删除building=yes标签。我已将修正上传。
Warin61 (2022-12-09 01:45:12+00:00): Hi,
I have deleted the Chinese 'names' from this and other past changesets. 
Please continue mapping .. but consider the 'names' and possibly use the description tag.
Warin61 (2022-12-09 02:20:49+00:00): Hi
The tag building=* should only be for the building, not a collection of buildings.
tastrax (2022-12-09 04:18:54+00:00): Hi 8046Bzytotn - it would be much appreciated if your changeset comments were a bit more descriptive about what you actually edited. Cheers
empty_child (2022-12-08 06:59:52+00:00): Еще раз приветствую. Эта часть улицы была закрыта на замену дорожного полотна. Вы ее отметили, как открытую, используя данные со спутника или будучи на месте?
jano1982 (2022-12-26 05:59:04+00:00): Привет , это часть открыто
empty_child (2022-12-26 06:36:49+00:00): На момент ваших изменений на этом фрагменте дороги проводили ремонтные работы, открыли дорогу на этой неделе
jano1982 (2022-12-26 06:50:30+00:00): сделали дорога и открыли , сейчас работа другом месте
ma-rt-in (2022-12-08 15:53:36+00:00): Hallo Markus,

ich vermute mal du hast den verlinkten Plan abgezeichnet. Hast du dafür eine Freigabe vom Urheber?
Auch kann ich beim LBM keine Meldung nachlesen, das die L141 umgelegt worden ist, sprich die alte Trasse zur Gemeindestraße abgestuft worden ist.
Des Weiteren finde ich das pure Löschen von alten Wege nicht hilfreich und sollte daher das lifecycle prefix angewandt werden.

vg
ma-rt-in (2022-12-08 15:55:20+00:00): Nachtrag: Du hast ebenfalls bestehende Routenverläufe zerstört und nicht nachbearbeitet.
Bitte erkläre das!
markus02174 (2022-12-08 16:02:40+00:00): Hallo Martin,
zu deiner Frage, ich habe die Zeichnung der LBM nicht als Vorlage sondern als Hinweis der Korrektheit dieser Änderungen mitgegeben. und weiterhin, ich war vor Ort und konnte es mit anschauen.
ma-rt-in (2022-12-08 16:06:55+00:00): 1. Die Karte ist nicht vom LMB sondern vom IRT.
2. Der LBM hat noch nicht offzielle bekannt gegeben, das hier der Baulastträger gewechselt ist. Daher bitte erfassen die ref´s wieder entsprechend.
markus02174 (2022-12-08 16:18:09+00:00): So, ich habe den ref von L141 neu, auf L47 zurück geändert. Du kannst ja dann die Presse verfolgen, wann diese umgewidmet wird und es dann ändern.
skyper (2023-03-14 14:42:12+00:00): Hallo,
welche Quellen wurden hier verwendet?
Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3589934.
Angeblich sollten die Änderungen schon mehrfach überprüft worden sein, siehe Kommentar 13 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129308457). Warum wurde das nicht bemerkt? Mir wäre das peinlich. Wie seht Ihr das?
Mit der Bitte um eine ausführliche Antwort und Schlussfolgerungen bzw. Veränderungen der Arbeitsweisen in eigenen Worten.

Fragende Grüße, 
eines enttäuschten skyper
deepikja (2023-03-22 19:32:21+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for helping us with your insights on the sources to be updated for every changeset. We have taken your suggestions on the addition of the correct sources into account while making the further edits and updated our internal sop with the steps to be followed while editing sources for any given changeset.
The editor here made the edit based on Esri World aerial imagery.
Regards,
Deepika
skyper (2023-03-23 15:10:15+00:00): Hi,
armchair-editing "directions" without ground proof (traffic sign) only from aerial imagery will fail most of the time. If there is no ground proof available, please, abstain from any changes of directions. As even my small sample size of edits regarding the task "added direction" still shows many bad ones and as the task continued after your first review I kindly ask for another this time meticulous review of all edits made for this task at least since Oct 2022. I would appreciate a timetable. Thanks in advance and regards,
skyper
deepikja (2023-03-23 17:17:36+00:00): Hi Skyper,
We have taken the initiative of conducting a second audit based on the suggestions you have provided across all the changesets. We have updated the timeline in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129308457. 
We have identified errors which were missed by newly onboarded reviewers from December-2022. However, as suggested by you we will consider auditing all the tasks edited from October-2022 till date. 
Please feel free to add suggestions if any. Thank you for your support. 
Regards.
Deepikja
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
ianlopez1115 (2023-07-29 13:08:58+00:00): This changeset deleted various structures that are still standing, reverted in changeset 139171448 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139171448)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129845459
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-11 09:04:26+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for Truman Orthodontics POI in changeset 183960659

https://osm.org/changeset/183960659
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-10 06:24:05+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129919106
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
chris66 (2024-06-01 07:15:50+00:00): Hi, der Verlauf ist mittlerweile im IDOP erkennbar, ein Stück Nähe Industriepark habe ich schon korrigiert.
chris66 (2024-06-01 18:34:06+00:00): Ist nun vom Indupark bis Hochmoor korrigert.
Farras (2023-01-26 18:31:26+00:00): Halo, mas Adnin. Changeset ini saya kembalikan (revert) ke versi sebelumnya karena jalan di Anarta House memang jalan setapak untuk penghuni/pejalan kaki (footway). Terima kasih.
GrabID_AdninWidyaR (2023-01-27 10:28:55+00:00): Halo Farras, salam kenal..
Changeset ini  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129846033. saya ubah dari footway ke residential karena ada keluhan dari driver : rute untuk Driver sampai ke Passanger (Anata House) memutar terlalu jauh sehingga rute sangat tidak sesuai/ lewat desa yang ada di belakang perumahan (jalan tidak terhubung). Maka footway yang jenisnya tidak dapat dilalui kendaraan, saya ubah ke residential agar rute yang akan dilalui dax bisa sesuai/ sampai ke anarta house melalui jalan yang sebenarnya , walaupun nantinya driver akan berjalan kaki dari jalan  Way: 697058160 sampai tepat di rumah passenger. Jadi mohon untuk tidak revert, Terimakasih sebelumnya
Farras (2023-02-15 07:09:16+00:00): Halo, mbak Adnin. Maaf baru membalas. Keluhan drivernya sangat masuk akal. Artinya, kali ini letak masalahnya ada di program pencarian rute (routing) Grab yang perlu disesuaikan. Ini memang problem yang unik.

Di Indonesia, seringkali desa terkurung oleh tembok perumahan sampai-sampai mengecoh program navigasi peta. Google Maps juga mengalami masalah ini. Barangkali solusinya adalah Grab membuat semacam geofence di peta internalnya agar driver yang menerima order dari dalam perumahan/klaster tidak diarahkan lewat jalan desa.

Mengapa demikian? Ada dua prinsip OSM yang berlaku di sini:

1) Data peta harus sesuai dengan yang ada kondisi dunia nyata (on the ground; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground).

2) Hindari mengubah data peta dengan maksud memuaskan program yang memanfaatkan data peta (tagging for the renderer; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer). Kalau data petanya sesuai kondisi dunia nyata, tetapi program navigasinya keliru dalam menerjemahkannya, programnyalah yang mesti diperbaiki, bukan data petanya yang dipas-paskan agar programnya terasa "benar".

Terima kasih.
nevw (2022-12-08 09:40:49+00:00): I find it difficult to see how you managed to map the items in your changesets to a state that is not evidenced by the satellite imagery. You are expected to zoom in very close and align the things you map to what you can see in the clearest or latest imagery.
Langlaeufer (2022-12-08 14:37:34+00:00): Hi, du hast für die Körtingstr. bicycle auf yes gesetzt. Das widerspricht sich mit  bicycle:conditional. Ist Auf der Straße Radfahren den ganzen Tag oder nur Nachts erlaubt?
karkor (2022-12-08 15:10:29+00:00): Moin Langlaeufer, das bicycle:conditional habe ich übersehen, sorry. Gestern war ich mit dem Rad dort und wollte schon absteigen wegen Fußgängerzone. Dann habe ich das Schild für die Fahrradfreigabe gesehen. Ich würde behaupten, dass es dort keine Einschränkung gab, bin mir aber nicht sicher. Ich schaue nochmal nach ...
Beste Grüße, Karsten
karkor (2022-12-08 18:40:22+00:00): So, der Teil mit der Zeitangabe war durch ein Fahrrad verstellt. Da war ich zu schnell. Sorry und danke für den Hinweis.
Langlaeufer (2022-12-08 21:40:32+00:00): :)
LockOnGuy (2022-12-08 07:59:39+00:00): Can you explain what you did here?    
1- Why your company always reuse old nodes and dragging them across the ocean? is this because of your bad import? Are you discussing the import when you add the data your company add to the map?          
2-Please use good changeset comments so people understand what your changeset is.      
Regards.
Mahdi Nameghi (2022-12-08 08:23:47+00:00): Hi 
This changeset reverted due to mistake in edit.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129850208
LockOnGuy (2022-12-08 08:27:34+00:00): @ Mahdi Nameghi that doesn’t explain why some of your editors reusing old nodes that was deleted 16 years ago like this case..
user_11609320 (2022-12-08 07:43:36+00:00): text from AB 8744:
Existing law vests the Department of Transportation with full possession and control of all state highways. Existing law describes the authorized routes in the state highway system and establishes a process for adoption of a highway on an authorized route by the California Transportation Commission. Existing law authorizes the commission to relinquish to local agencies state highway segments that have been deleted from the state highway system by legislative enactment or have been superseded by relocation, and in certain other cases. Existing law designates State Route 83 from Route 71 to Route 10 near the City of Upland.
This bill would authorize the commission to relinquish to the City of Ontario all or a portion of State Route 83 within the city’s jurisdiction and prescribe conditions that apply upon relinquishment.
marczoutendijk (2023-03-18 19:27:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230718064
What are you trying to say with "surface=2"
That is a non recognised value for the surface tag.