piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
blackadder (2020-01-24 09:31:42+00:00): I'm easy on this. The tagging format probably dates back to 2012 when I did the import for Phase 1 and the translation from the government data to OSM tags wasn't as mature as it would be today. Anyway, feel free to adjust though note none of the HS2 route sections are in build currently through the start of construction for Phase 1 is imminent. The relation reference for each phase in case you need them are on the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/High_Speed_2
abdeldjalil (2016-12-07 16:10:48+00:00): http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1541070&page=5#82
pyram (2017-03-21 21:07:26+00:00): Hallo alexm12,

bitte nutze als Quelle nicht "Google Maps" - insbesondere dann nicht, wenn es falsch ist ;-) Diese Art von "Fernerkundung" ist weder erwünscht, noch legal.
highflyer74 (2016-12-08 07:43:00+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

This place ist already mapped, so I will remove the one you added again... Please have a lookout when adding things, if they are already mapped.

Thank you!
Supaplex (2016-12-08 11:26:02+00:00): 有名字嗎？
tbicr (2016-12-08 08:35:00+00:00): Вітаю, відавочна гэта працяг нашай папярэдняй гутаркі: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39969881. Я пачаў тэму на форуме каб ў будучыні пазьбегнуць падобных пытаньняў: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=621448#p621448.
ndm (2016-12-07 21:05:42+00:00): I thought it was mapped fairly well. I note it doesn't align with Bing -- and there's no way for motorbikes to turn into Emma-Chris way now -- which I'm pretty sure that they are allowed to. Did you survey this?
FastProger (2016-12-09 10:42:29+00:00): Вы знаете что здесь поворот разрешен только ночью? Почему вы это не учли? Удаляйте:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458321636
mavl (2016-12-09 11:52:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-09 18:22:45+00:00): As I mentioned back in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42920193 and previously, you've re-added an imaginery name:fr to part of the M1 and M18 here. I drive these roads fairly regularly and can assure you that no such name is signposted. As previously discussed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39515595 please don't add names that don't exist in the real world just to make it appear in JOSM.
Carnildo (2016-12-07 23:05:14+00:00): A mini-roundabout is a type of junction between multiple streets.  For a roundabout-type structure at the end of a street, mark it as a "turning loop".
geodreieck4711 (2017-01-24 00:14:13+00:00): es sollte einfach versucht werden, nicht  landuses, strassen, und andere geometrien einfach über- und aneinander zu kleben.....
kleinere Änderungssätze wären mit ID evtl. auch besser handzuhaben.
arcanma (2017-01-11 18:35:50+00:00): Il percorso 458323117 (vineyard) ha un tratto che interseca se stesso, sarebbe da correggere. Grazie.
b-jazz (2018-12-06 01:28:38+00:00): Is this a four hole course? If so, there is a more accepted way of mapping it so that there isn't a single intersecting line. Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disc_golf for suggestions on how to map it. We'd love to see more courses properly mapped so they show up in searches.
Let me know if you need help.
Landou (2016-12-08 18:39:54+00:00): Bonjour, sauriez vous me dire a quel étage est ce tympan? "sous sol" n'est pas une valeur correcte pour "level", plus dinfo sur le wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:level
lionelDiversions (2016-12-08 19:16:20+00:00): Bonjour, oui je viens de regarder votre lien sur le wiki cela correspond donc au niveau level=-1
dvdhoven (2016-12-07 20:59:45+00:00): Fietspaden langs wegen krijgen de naam van de weg. Dat is een afspraak die binnen de NL Community is gemaakt. Dit ivm met het vinden van adressen.
De OFM kan een aantal adressen niet vinden omdat de wegen niet toegankelijk zijn voor fietsen, door nu de fietspaden de naam van de naastliggende weg, waar ze bijhoren, te geven kunnen adressen wel gevonden worden.
Verder is het voor routering en routebeschrijving van belang dat fietspaden wel namen krijgen.
Ik heb inmiddels een aantal paden terug gewijzigd en wacht nog op een reactie op mijn eerdere opmerkingen.
alod (2016-12-08 08:09:52+00:00): Like :)
StephaneP (2018-08-04 15:33:47+00:00): Ben alors, on me vire le mini giratoire sur le node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1081869350 sans aller vérifier sur place ??
:-)
Carto'Cité (2018-09-02 10:23:24+00:00): Oups... mais qu'est-ce qui m'a pris !?!
gileri (2016-12-15 22:14:24+00:00): Bonjour,

Est-ce que Photomaton est la marque de la cabine ?

Dans ce cas il existe le tag brand=* qui semble plus adapté.
Jerome__ (2016-12-16 11:59:37+00:00): Bonjour,
Non ce n'est pas la marque de la cabine (je n'ai pas connaissance de cette information). Juste une note correspondant au nom usuel de ce type de cabine (car le tag n'est pas répandu sur la région).
gileri (2016-12-18 20:12:41+00:00): Ok, si tu as un doute de la reconnaissance de ce tag, je pense qu'il est préférable d'utiliser quelque chose comme "description=Cabine photo style Photomaton" ; les contributeurs et consommateurs des données verront ainsi cette description.
DenisJu (2016-12-08 11:14:32+00:00): Përshëndetje!
për ndryshimin e bërë "changeset  4526281296" për bashkangjitjen e dy pikave të kategorisë "hairdresser + massage" jeni bazuar në vëzhgimin përpara vendit?!
Flm!

https://postimg.org/image/7if1q1s5f/
DenisJu (2016-12-23 13:34:11+00:00): Për këtë changeset:

- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4526281296
fotot janë shkrepur me 22.11.2016:

- https://i.imgsafe.org/d260335c77.jpg
- https://i.imgsafe.org/d26066e81f.jpg

dhe vendosja si POI's është bërë me 28.11.2016.
Verifikimi në terren ndodhi përsëri nga ana ime!

Nuk kuptoj ndyshimin/qëllimin (delete) dhe bashkimin e dy POI's "hairdresser + massage" nga ana juaj?!?!
Flm!
Leeturtle (2016-12-23 16:32:28+00:00): Shumë e cuditshme pasi nuk e mbaj mend të kem bërë një ndryshim të tillë. Nuk është as zona që zakonisht editoj... Ndoshta është bere gabimisht. Ndjesë për ngatërresën.
ndm (2016-12-07 20:56:06+00:00): Not sure what "foot access" has to do with this change. It just seems to lose information about switching lanes. Bing imagery is out of date -- and I thought it was mapped fairly well. Did you survey this?
Mike Baggaley (2016-12-07 23:08:37+00:00): Apologies if I have misinterpreted this junction. I was adding sidewalk=none to clarify why the road had no foot access. In looking at the junction, I did not think there was any kerb between the two directions of traffic, so considered that the correct mapping was to only have a single highway showing. If there is indeed a physical separation, please feel free to restore the deleted section of highway. If the separation between lanes is only paint, then only a single highway should be shown.

Cheers,
Mike
yaugenka (2017-10-18 22:52:39+00:00): Пожалуйста не удаляйте точки place=locality
Dehty (2017-10-18 23:24:07+00:00): Не совсем понимаю (совсем не понимаю) о чём речь.
yaugenka (2017-10-19 00:15:16+00:00): Ну вы когда деревню в locality переводите, удаляете точку, как например здесь
http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=243012748
Не стоит ее удалять, пригодится еще.
Dehty (2017-10-19 17:08:58+00:00): Сейчас трудно вспомнить КАК я удалял в декабре 2016 г. Я работаю в браузере, возможно оттуда "ушли точки". Однако как сейчас "Местность" - это более правильно, чем населённый пункт, которого уже близко не существует и самое плохое, что в автонавигаторах через них дорога прокладывается. Я всё к тому, что не со зла чего-то там удаляю.
yaugenka (2017-10-19 23:45:05+00:00): Поясните пожалуйста, насчет "и самое плохое, что в автонавигаторах через них дорога прокладывается". Через точку locality прокладывается?
Dehty (2017-10-20 20:12:07+00:00): Я не знаю, что такое "точка locality" , бо повторюсь, я работаю просто в редакторе браузера. Но я хорошо помнбя ка я я плутал заехав в лес, где колдобины глубиной до полуметра для трактора "Беларус" вот здесь - ч"https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=16/54.7737/27.7291. Там нету вёски Селишча, просто заросли кустарника, но в навигаторах - это населённый пункт и через него идёт дорога, а фактически там колея для трактора. Потому ВСЕГДА проехав, я изменяю дорогу и ОТСУТСТВИЕ НАСЕЛЁННОГО ПУНКТА, чтобы навигатору на основе ОСМ не хотелось проводить там маршрут. Если при этом пропадают точки locality, я не считаю себя виноватым ибо я их не вижу в редакторе формы браузера. Выбачайце... .
yaugenka (2017-10-20 21:05:06+00:00): Сетовать на карту тоже неправильно. Мы же вместе ее рисуем в свое свободное время и никто не будет гарантировать актуальность данных. Эта деревня пока еще числится в реестрах, но по данным 2016 года там уже нет населения и ее уже можно переводить в разряд урочищ. Достаточно прописать ей place=locality + abandoned:place:hamlet в точке и в отношении и навигаторы больше не будут считать ее жилым населенным пунктов, но при этом останется возможность построить к ней маршрут, если кто-то захочет посетить урочище.
yaugenka (2017-10-20 21:14:15+00:00): Кстати, я сам в браузере рисую в iD редакторе. Там же есть раздел "Все Теги" в котором и меняются эти значения, если я вас правильно понял.
Dehty (2017-10-20 21:21:57+00:00): Так, абсалютна згодны. Я ўсё спрабую Вам растлумачыць, што рэдагаванне ў браўзеры не злучана з "locality" і не дае гарантыі на іх наяўнасць, або выдаленне. Асабіста я не выдаляў тыя кропкі "locality", пра якія Вы запыталіся. Так атрымалася, і мяркую тут праблема не адзініага удзельніка, а метада працы ў ОСМе. Прабачце, але на тэгі я звяртаю ўвагу толькі пры удакладненні якасці тых зменаў, што дадаю. Для мяне галоўнае ВІЗУАЛЬНЫЯ змены на мапе. Г.зн. я павінен бачыцб той малюнак, што павінен ббыць і ў навігатарах. А тэкставыя характэрыстыкі аб'екта - гэта ўжо другаснае. Прабачце калі я не правы, ці перашкаджаю канонам ОСМ, але працую па факце, толькі там дзе быў непасрэдна і бачыў якасць, межы, назвы і г.д. Пішыце, буду сачыць за парадамі. На сёння - я спаць, дзякую за вашу прынцыповасць. З павагай. Аляксандр :) .
majkaz (2016-12-12 10:09:16+00:00): Hi and thanks for adding to the map. But I have noticed already several times, that you use almost inclusively the tag "police" or "community centre". Can you try to find the correct one and if you cannot find it, could you please leave a simple note instead? 
And please, check that the place isn't already mapped - you are adding duplicates, even to your own mapping.
aseerel4c26 (2016-12-07 22:26:58+00:00): just for reference - this is about https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43414281
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:21:40+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
GinaroZ (2016-12-07 22:52:40+00:00): Hi, don't know if you have seen it but there's a note here in case you managed to survey the health centre: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/574834
arcanma (2017-01-21 18:24:36+00:00): Non capisco perché sono stati inseriti tutti spezzoni di strade agricole, dalle foto aeree non vedo interruzioni. Perché non è stata inserita tutta intera?
TracyQi (2016-12-07 20:19:59+00:00): #msftbing
voland87 (2017-01-03 13:23:22+00:00): Wieso sind da zwei Haltepunkte für Melchow?
AsgerFrank (2016-12-14 12:08:51+00:00): Tags må være glemt på http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458350701
Kom forbi den via OSMI:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.48962&lat=55.41251&zoom=14
SomeoneElse (2016-12-08 13:04:09+00:00): What were the usage statistics on "shop=candle" and "shop=candles" before you changed e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4401825186/history ?
SomeoneElse (2016-12-08 13:10:46+00:00): You might also want to double-check the spelling of the "Yankie" in here too, or check with the original mapper.
LeTopographeFou (2016-12-08 19:39:32+00:00): Hi, since only "candles" is documented on the wiki and was mostly used, I pick this one to consolidate the use of this type of shop. A bit of math: there was 37 shop=candle vs 102 shop=candles. Reguarding "Yankie" I decided to focus this type of mass edit to the bare minimum, i.e. not fixing other tags than the one I'm working on. Otherwise I would likely introduce errors. Consequently I will not check this tag and let it to someone else who will work at a local scale.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-09 17:39:27+00:00): Thanks for that.  I'll have to add "candles" to https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/SomeoneElse-style/blob/master/style.lua .
EIjas (2016-12-08 10:21:46+00:00): Добрый день!

Вы уверены, что стройка съезда с СПАД к Пулково-1 уже началась?
Ильин Роман (2016-12-08 10:24:32+00:00): Ну смотря что значит началось) на стадии проектной документации - это началось? Если не устраивает констракшен, могу вернуть пропосед
EIjas (2016-12-08 10:41:40+00:00): Если на местности следов строительства не видно - однозначно proposed. Проектная документация может годами висеть в воздухе.
streinger (2016-12-08 12:22:02+00:00): please tell me why you did maxheight to all lesnaya street (way 39665876)?, and in russian wiki maxheight still used on nodes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:maxheight;
i have seen in english wiki that maxheight shoud not to be used on nodes.
cdavila (2016-12-09 16:54:15+00:00): Hello
I did it following recommendation for maxheigth on ways from English wiki, which is suppose to be the most up to date. Didn't know about Russian wiki, sorry. Feel free to revert if you find it more convenient.
streinger (2016-12-09 17:56:53+00:00): let it stay, cause in wiki available languages only for russian language this rule has not been updated, maybe later.
And the question was why you did maxheight to all  street (way 39665876), maybe need  do it much closer to the node where height_restrictor
cdavila (2016-12-09 18:12:01+00:00): You are absolutely right about that. I have fixed it.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-20 00:16:57+00:00): Hello, 
You've merged together various "estate_agents", "estate_agency" etc. in here.  I can see the logic in this, except that you've ignored the main tag of "shop" or "office" and made them all "office".  I've certainly used both "shop" and "office" for estate agents, depending on whether the thing was more of a shop or an office.  In the UK, depending on the chain you may get estate agents that look both a bit like a shop and a bit like an office, that look just like an office, and (increasingly) have no back-office functions there at all and are really just shops.  I'd suggest that these last ones should be tagged shop=estate_agent.
Cheers,
Andy
LeTopographeFou (2017-02-06 23:37:00+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse,
Yes I see your point and I've followed a little bit the comments about shop vs office for this kind of business. What do you propose? I'm afraid that I will not be able to make the difference between those two as I'm not from England and can't check by myself.
SomeoneElse (2017-02-07 00:17:47+00:00): > What do you propose?
I'd change the ones that were shop previously (like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351521115/history ) back to shop, and if any of them had other tags that were changed into "office" at the same time, I'd change those back too.
LeTopographeFou (2017-02-10 18:41:43+00:00): Done, all previously tagged shops have been redefined as shop. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45980978
FreedSky (2016-12-10 12:43:49+00:00): Philippines, I have no control of the deleted, please do not say disappear, the Philippines did not control the current.
FvGordon (2016-12-10 15:37:10+00:00): In boundary relations we have the roles 'outer' and sometimes also 'inner' and sometimes more role identifiers like 'label'. I only filled the empty fields with the role 'outer' (and sorted the members of the boundary relation). I didn't use any of the words in the changeset comment you criticised.
Hjart (2016-12-08 08:42:41+00:00): Hvad var det meningen at dette skulle henvise til?
GerdP (2017-08-27 09:02:52+00:00): Hi!
I guess you already know now:
Please don't use highway=uncassified_link / residential_link etc. These don't exist.
See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/highway-residential-link-td5859566.html
yaugenka (2016-12-09 18:40:50+00:00): Bondar Bohdan, здравствуйте!
В Беларуси негласно принято использовать русские, а не белорусские названия в ключах name, и addr:*.
Откатите ваши изменения пожалуйста.
yaugenka (2016-12-09 18:42:12+00:00): Названия на белорусском задаем в ключе name:be.
yaugenka (2016-12-10 18:43:29+00:00): Поправил сам.
Ale_Zena_IT (2016-12-08 08:27:50+00:00): Ciao, nei percorsi da te disegnati mancava il tag (il descrittore che indica cos'è l'oggetto disegnato). Ho inserito highway=path presumendo si tratti di un sentiero
muralito (2017-01-14 12:39:13+00:00): Hola. Tenes documentacion del proceso de importacion de estas interpolaciones?

¿Como se valido?

Lo primero que veo es que hay algunas cosas que parecen inconsistentes como esta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458377891

y que ninguno de los valores "addr:street" corresponde (tiene que ser igual) con el "name" de la calle que debiera
muralito (2017-01-14 12:40:21+00:00): Otro tipo de caso para ver https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4543962384
muralito (2017-01-14 12:42:09+00:00): Y varias lineas estan desplazadas respecto a la calle, ambas lineas de interpolacion del mismo laddo, podria ser problema de precicson la calle y no de la interpolacion pero habria que revisarlos.
muralito (2017-01-14 12:49:31+00:00): Fijate que el OSM Inspector muestra toda la zona con problemas. 

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=-58.37140&lat=-34.70160&zoom=13&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,place_not_found,misformatted_housenumber,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas,addrx_on_nonclosed_way
bielebog (2016-12-16 12:37:58+00:00): Obvious vandalism. Needs to be reverted.
Nakaner (2016-12-16 15:30:34+00:00): Hi bielebog,

I don't think so. If you have a look at the Bing imagery, you will see that these buildings exist on the imagery.

Your response should not be a revert. Instead, you should map the missing buildings inside the round curves of the letters, i.e. convert the graffiti to a proper coating of the wall.

Best regards

Michael
bielebog (2016-12-18 21:19:27+00:00): Hi Nakaner, you're right. Checking Bing imagery, the building used for this graffiti are actual visible buildings. Didn't expect that and agree that a revert would not be a proper response. It's a weird edit anyways.
hamidgf (2016-12-08 18:16:34+00:00): Sevgili sivasteammap5 ekibi, katkılarınızdan dolayı öncelikle teşekkürler ancak kaynağından&doğruluğundan emin olmadığınız düzenlemeler yapmaz iseniz topluluk adına daha faydalı bir çalışma ortaya çıkacaktır bilginize. İyi çalışmalar.
JAAS (2017-12-27 09:07:46+00:00): Actualizando datos en esta área me encontré con que la interpolación ingresada hace aproximadamente un año está aparentemente cruzada, es decir la numeración de los pares se encuentre del lado de los impares y vice-versa.

Físicamente encontré este error sobre la calle Doctor Roberto Paxtot (#543), entre las calles Doctor Alfredo Palacios y Jean Juares y posteriormente confirmé en el área e general y la información definitivamente está invertida.

Actualmente estamos ingresando la numeración (altura) de los edificios de forma esporádica como referencia (basados en inspección visual), pero encontré con que los datos ingresados de la fuente citada no coinciden con la realidad.

No se si le es posible confirmar si fue error de la fuente o una equivocación al momento de ingresar los datos y poder corregirlo de acorde, pues la fuente es "oficial".

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44247490#map=18/-34.67566/-58.40001

Gracias!
hcastellaro (2017-12-27 12:44:54+00:00): Hola JAAS. Sí, fue un primer ejercicio de importación a partir de una fuente oficial: Estadística de la Provincia de Buenos Aires. lamentablemente resultó que en algunos sectores los datos no son correctos.
Felipe Alves (2016-12-11 13:17:19+00:00): Oi, Felinto. As edições que você faz no Maps.ME aparecem no mapa público, portanto vou remover o nome que colocou aqui, ok?
GerdP (2017-09-17 07:54:03+00:00): Hi!
Please check this junction:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4544152911
The roads are not connected.
div006 (2019-04-02 03:58:39+00:00): Hi Gafuri,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way 458404654 classified as 'secondary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,from node 4544155462 to node 6262440665  seems to be 'Residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance.
Carnildo (2016-12-08 05:54:36+00:00): Some of these tags don't seem to be appropriate.  For example, "Hillside" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6071193) and "Walker's Point" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6029898) both have the Wikidata tag "Q6988108", which is "Neighborhoods of Milwaukee".  Individual neighborhoods don't appear to have Wikidata entries, and as such shouldn't have "wikidata=" tags.
nyuriks (2017-01-04 22:35:06+00:00): Carnildo, thanks, totally forgot about this issue - I have easily found all affected items using   relation["wikipedia"~"#"]["wikidata"]["admin_level"];
query.  That said, these are not incorrect Wikidata IDs, they are simply less then accurate, and should be improved. The currently used Wikidata ID represents "all the topics as discussed in the linked Wikipedia articles". This is not very good, and should be improved by creating the more specific Wikidata IDs. I will work on improving them further.
nyuriks (2017-01-05 11:16:31+00:00): Ok, done - all Milwaukee neighborhoods (wikidata=Q6988108) have been fixed - i created wd items for them
Carnildo (2017-01-05 21:11:40+00:00): Thanks -- that seems like the best solution.
reddox (2018-07-24 11:25:10+00:00): nyuriks, shouldn't R-181732 (Belcourt) be a town / village? 'locality' seems inappropriate.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/181732#map=14/48.8470/-99.7310
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:48:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 17:48:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
cdavila (2022-01-03 10:00:52+00:00): Why do you add place=city to the whole admin boundary. Most territory within this boundary is not part of the city, so I think it's mostly wrong tagging it as such. Ulaanbataar city is currently assigned to node 27547986.
toyotagps (2022-01-03 14:30:49+00:00): Tag Place need for make address search. The node does not allow this. I really don't know the boundaries of the city and made the largest possible polygon.. If you known boundary of Ulaanbataar, you can edit the boundary.
cdavila (2022-01-04 17:00:58+00:00): I have replaced old boundary with a new polygon, based en current OSM data and Bing aerial imagery. It still needs improvement, but I think it's more realistic than previous one and will suffice for address search.