piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
santamariense (2016-11-25 21:55:04+00:00): Olá Rodrigo. Bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap.
Tua edição não vai ajudar muito quem está procurando a "Ótica do Povo", porque ela não foi mapeada corretamente.
Para corrigir faça o seguinte:
1 - Entre no modo de edição (https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&node=4520999039#map=19/-19.91970/-43.94151);
2 - Reposicione/Arraste o marcador para o local certo, pois atualmente está no meio da rua, alinhando pela base dos prédios e não pelo topo;
3 - Do lado esquerdo da tela, clique em ponto e procure por "ótica";
4 - Preencha cada campo no seu lugar certo: Nome, rua, número, cep, ....
5 - Para adicionar mais detalhes, role até "Todas as etiquetas", e clique no +. Exemplo: description="Filial 146"; Se tiver o número do telefone, adicione contact:phone = +55 55 5555-5555.
Tudo no OSM, além da posição correta, baseia-se em tags. Quanto mais detalhes se adiciona a um objeto melhor. Veja como exemplo esta ótica: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3657222075

Qualquer dúvida, pergunte...
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-03-01 13:11:22+00:00): Olá Diego, estas vias que foram importadas realmente existem? Senão existirem tem que ter as tags highway=construction ou highway=proposed.
Diego Teixeira (2017-03-01 20:23:12+00:00): Boa tarde Erick.
Existem sim. Nossa empresa está fazendo o plano de mobilidade da cidade e estamos atualizando de acordo com o material recebido da prefeitura. O mesmo está acontecendo em Prata, Monte Carmelo, Ituiutaba e Santa Vitória. Em todas, a Imagem de satélite do OSM está muito desatualizada. Quanto à essas qualificações, nos confundimos muito, e como o tempo está curto, apenas fizemos a base para usá-las nos mapas.
maraf24 (2016-11-25 21:04:15+00:00): W takich sytuacji dodajemy jeszcze tag informujący o pochodzeniu ograniecznia, tj.
source:maxspeed=PL:zone30
Edytor webowy nie ma niestety tego w szablonie.
Supaplex (2016-11-26 04:46:05+00:00): Is there a name for the shop?
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:54:01+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
maraf24 (2016-11-25 21:06:12+00:00): Wyspeka już tu była prawidłowo oznakowana przy użyciu tagu traffic_calming=island.
poornibadrinath (2016-12-02 06:03:26+00:00): Hi Attilla,
 I came across your edits and noticed you have marked address points as attractions. Please note this is the wrong way of tagging addresses. There is a specific address tags. Attraction tags are majorly used for tourism related poi's like a famous place, or a museum, or a view point etc. I am partially reverting this changeset and deleting the unwanted attraction tags. Please do go through tagging wiki for OSM. 
Best,
Poornima Badrinath
wille (2016-12-13 11:58:57+00:00): Olá, FHSA

Você mapeou nessa edição várias fazendas com a tag de acampamento. Todas elas realmente oferecem camping?
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-26 16:11:37+00:00): Hallo riederwald, willkommen beim OpenStreetMap Projekt. Könntest du uns bitte sagen, warum du die Pestalozzischule gelöscht hast? Vgl. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43949251
SimonPoole (2016-11-26 17:14:24+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43967687
muralito (2017-03-29 13:12:46+00:00): Hola. Eu quero saber como o processo para verificar a integridade, para aplicá-la em outro casos.¿Esta documentado?
trigpoint (2016-11-26 15:46:18+00:00): Do we have permission to copy from the parks department information board?
LE6Ram (2016-11-28 12:07:21+00:00): Hi.  These paths are being put in as part of a project funded by the City Council.  I probably didn't make clear on my reasons that I walked all paths using a GPS unit and paper and pencil survey maps provided by the council and then checked against notice board.  I did tell the on site ranger what I was up to.  
Regards
trigpoint (2016-11-28 20:27:42+00:00): Thank you, walking them with a GPS is the best survey you can have. There is no need to justify what you have seen, unlike wikipedia we prefer original work.
gallseife (2016-11-28 17:16:55+00:00): Die Parkplätze direkt am Kreisel gibt es also noch?
L1ngling (2016-11-28 18:53:41+00:00): ja hab vor 2 Tagen dort geparkt
gallseife (2016-11-28 19:23:57+00:00): Eine bessere Quelle gibt es nicht :)
Sanniu (2017-05-24 09:56:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455763936 - it's look like right turn to bypass a traffic light but does not have a one-way property, is it missed there?
Also the same on another turn at the same junction.
maraf24 (2016-11-25 21:09:54+00:00): Nie ma nigdzie w danych tych 60km/h.
Autominus (2016-11-27 21:50:15+00:00): Jeżdżę tamtędy i jest znak 60 km/h, a zaraz przed samym mostem jest dodatkowo znak 40 km/h. Te znaki są jak się jedzie z Wrocławia w stronę Kątów Wrocławskich.
maraf24 (2016-11-27 22:02:22+00:00): Chodziło mi o to, ze w OSM nie widzę tych 60km. Nadal jest 90. Może zmiany się nie zapisały?
mariotomo (2021-06-07 15:52:12+00:00): hola. todavía existe "el valle de la luna"?  quieren ayudarme a mapearlo correctamente?
canfe (2020-05-01 16:12:34+00:00): Io ho sempre sentito dire "Pian degli uccelli" con particolare riferimento alla zona umida più verso Santa Cristina poco distante da lì.
Jrachi (2020-05-01 16:16:26+00:00): Carte comunali danno quello come nome ufficiale da circa un secolo.
La zona umida (che spero di avere mappato correttamente è la zona umida più vasta delle valli di Lanzo, ed ha un drenaggio artificiale che poteva essere chiuso per avere una riserva di acqua nelle stagioni secche.
canfe (2020-05-02 11:37:39+00:00): In effetti guardando sulle IGM è proprio come di ci tu.
Sei sempre una bella fonte di informazioni!
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
Carlos Brys (2016-11-26 12:03:30+00:00): Gastón
¿Estás seguro que en ese lugar hay un bar?
En la foto satelital no aparece ningún edificio
maraf24 (2016-11-25 21:01:29+00:00): Na pewno 30? W danych ulicy widnieje informacja o strefie 40, ale może to błąd.
Na pewno którąś z tych danych należałoby skorygować.
Autominus (2016-11-27 22:02:53+00:00): Wjeżdżając w ulicę Słoneczną mamy znak strefy 30 km/h.
Wjeżdżając w ulicę Połabian mamy znak strefy 30 km/h.
Ulica Słowińców nie ma oznakowania dotyczące prędkości, ale zgodnie z przepisami ruchu drogowego znajduje się w strefie 30 km/h.
maraf24 (2016-11-27 22:29:12+00:00): To trzeba by poprawić source:maxspeed.
Zrobię to przy okazji.
naoliv (2016-11-26 01:17:51+00:00): Junior, você está inserindo bastante informação quebrada e duplicada no mapa, talvez pela forma como você está fazendo isso (com o QGIS).
Você não quer entrar em contato com a comunidade antes, utilizando algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact para ver uma forma melhor de você mapear?
Da forma que você está fazendo está gerando muitos erros.
Utilizar o QGIS não é ideal para isso.
Junior_Prado (2016-11-28 14:32:46+00:00): Olá,

Estava tentando reverter o erro que cometi dias antes, por isso a ocorrências de vias deletadas, duplicadas e quebradas.
Nas próximas edições deixarei um breve comentário sobre as alterações.

Não estava subindo aos poucos as alterações, por isso acredito que seja isso as mudanças drásticas. Nas próximas, subirei as poucos. 

Obrigado,

Agostinho
utack (2016-11-25 21:53:45+00:00): Das war definitiv Unsinn, danke für's Prüfen
sofasurfer68 (2016-11-27 15:01:27+00:00): Danke fürs positive Feedback.
maraf24 (2016-11-25 20:58:22+00:00): Nie musisz zapisywać zmian po dodaniu każdego progu. Możesz dodać wszystkie progi i wtedy zapisać.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
Geography Canada (2016-11-28 23:44:07+00:00): Why?
DenisCarriere (2016-11-29 00:26:19+00:00): Why do you open so many notes?

If you would of looked what was changed, this wikidata code was incorrect and pointed to somewhere in Iran.
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/321593853
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5810180
Geography Canada (2016-11-29 15:28:10+00:00): 1. There are people who make much more notes than me, such as the person with the most OSM edits ever created by any person worldwide (with over 270,000 changesets and over 18,000 notes): http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/andrewpmk/notes?page=1.

2. Sorry! I did not realize this was in Guinea :D! Sorry again. Thanks for your reply.
corfede (2016-12-01 17:38:14+00:00): I tag addr* servono per inserire indirizzi, non vanno usati sulle strade highway=*.
maraf24 (2016-12-14 01:05:35+00:00): Z tym że:
1. numery dróg umieszczamy w tagu ref. I tylko tam.
2. Odkąd-dokąd prowadzi droga to nie jest nazwa i nie umieszczamy tego w name. 

Nie wprowadzaj takich "nazw", bo prędzej czy później ktoś je usunie.
corfede (2016-12-01 17:28:24+00:00): I tag addr:* servono per indicare un indirizzo ma non devono essere usati sui tratti di strada highway=*. In questa zona (in particolare in alcune aree) le foto Bing sono deformate, quindi non è corretto correggere quanto già mappato. Al limite conviene fare riferimento alle ortofoto PCN o altro.
Geo Marco (2016-12-01 17:50:10+00:00): Salve, grazie per avermelo detto. Sono alle mie prime modifiche... Lo terrò presente.. grazie del consiglio.
corfede (2016-12-01 17:56:36+00:00): Figurati di nulla, se hai bisogno di informazioni sono a disposizione.
Alecs01 (2016-11-26 13:09:00+00:00): Hola Rubén, las plazas y la fuente ya estaban en el mapa, por favor no dupliques objetos, gracias.
frosm (2019-05-31 14:47:23+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455816544
la présence de toilette dans ce qui semble être un couloir me parait étrange
j'imagine que c'est plutôt le prolongement du building=roof situé à l'est
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455816551
la géométrie de cette pièce aussi
je n'arrive pas à deviner quel pourrait être sa géométrie exacte,particulièrement vu la présence d'une porte depuis la Salle de sieste vers l'est, donne-t-elle dans le passage qui serrait non droit ?
alphensebezorger (2016-11-27 20:36:47+00:00): Hallo Jimiiee,
bedankt voor het toevoegen van de POI in deze cahngeset. Kun je de naam van de sleutelmaker controleren? Volgens mij moet dat Aarnoudse zijn, met een d erin dus.
Groet, Alphensebezorger.
P.S. Meestal wordt in Nederland de tag van een winkel o.i.d. aan de al aanwezige adres-node toegevoegd, dan is het adres gelijk gekoppeld aan de winkel. Ik weet niet of je dat met OsmAnd ook lukt.
gitidi (2016-11-27 16:20:04+00:00): Please delete item Chapel.
Keep 'Kapelletje' ( Dutch for little chapel )
Thanks.
muesli13 (2016-11-25 22:33:41+00:00): Sorry, Titel falsch. 
Sollte sein: "Straßenführung nach U-Bahn Bau angepasst"
muesli13 (2016-11-25 22:33:21+00:00): Sorry, Titel falsch. 
Sollte sein: "Straßenführung nach U-Bahn Bau angepasst"
muralito (2016-11-26 17:24:51+00:00): POR FAVOR NO UNIR CALLES QUE TIENEN RELACIONES DE LIMITES O RUTAS DE BUS!!!

EJEMPLO DE COMO QUEDAN MAL!!!
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5639466#map=16/-34.9080/-56.1782
JAAS (2016-11-28 12:53:26+00:00): Gracias por el aviso, aunque temo es posible que haya cometido el mismo error nuevamente el fin de semana, pues aun no había leído el mensaje.  Yo ya he dado aviso acerca de esta situación para evitar que continuemos haciéndola.

En cuánto a las ediciones que estamos haciendo, quisiera solicitarte que me envíes copia, adicional a la persona responsable, de lo que encuentres con algún problema de todo lo realizado bajo KG 2016.  Yo me encargaré de coordinar la comunicación hacia el resto del equipo, haciéndome así responsable de centralizar y agilizar el proceso de la ediciones de nuestra parte en Uruguay.  Todo esto con el fin de unificar los criterios a seguir qué, como todos sabemos, muchas veces puede ser subjetivo.

Espero con esto logremos mejorar los mapas a beneficio de todos.

Atentamente,
Jorge
muralito (2016-11-29 11:32:04+00:00): Te hago llegar las sugerencias por PM.
maraf24 (2016-11-26 15:59:07+00:00): Tu dobrze jest dodać source:addr=uwaga, bo inaczej przy aktualizacji adresów nikt się nie zorientuje, że była jakaś poprawka.
joost schouppe (2016-11-29 18:16:36+00:00): Dag Matthias,
Ik heb een paar kleine aanpassingen gedaan. Je had een vlakje getekend op de Groenlaan, maar niet aangegeven wat voor type het was. Ik heb de situatie een beetje anders ingetekend, check eens of je het zo OK vindt.
Daarnaast heb je op een aantal voetwegen access=no en motor_vehicle=private gezet. Doorgaans wordt "no" als streng niet toegestaan gelezen, dus vreemd dat iedereen dan uitzonderingen krijgt. Lijkt mij logischer dat de algemene toegang op private staat, net als de motor_vehicle toegang. Alleen, als auto's op het pad komen, dan wordt dit doorgaans beschouwd als een toegangsweg.
Tomas Straupis (2016-11-26 06:56:42+00:00): It was already marked as motor_vehicle=no and in its essence it is not a path/footway. So change reverted.
trigpoint (2016-11-26 15:49:24+00:00): Are there really shops in the middle of the pitches at Stamford Bridge and White Hart Lane?
trigpoint (2016-11-27 17:24:40+00:00): Rubbish has been deleted
DavidKewley (2016-11-26 02:01:34+00:00): Hi Pedro, this changeset deleted some ways that were part of two relations (one landuse=forest and one landuse=meadow). Was that intentional? If so, why, and do you realize that those relations are now incomplete or broken? Thanks, David
pedrodelmonte (2016-11-26 17:55:19+00:00): Unintentional. Please feel free to correct them as needed. I am a new user.
DavidKewley (2016-11-26 01:57:09+00:00): Hi Pedro, this changeset deleted some landuse=forest and natural=wood areas. Was that intentional? If so, I'm curious why you deleted them. Thanks, David
pedrodelmonte (2016-11-26 17:54:51+00:00): Unintentional. Please feel free to correct them as needed. I am a new user.
0000FF berries (2016-11-26 01:19:33+00:00): It was note #792835, not #92835
hobbesvsboyle (2018-02-21 18:41:01+00:00): I noticed that you added the runways for "Dudley Airport." Do you have local knowledge that these actually still exist? I couldn't find any FAA info for the airport, and on the aerial imagery, at least one of the landing strips looked to be in pretty rough shape.
DavidKewley (2016-11-26 06:08:33+00:00): Hi Pedro, In this changeset you deleted a way that was a member of a landuse=forest relation, thereby breaking the relation. Was that intentional? Please respond to this and the other two changeset comments. Thanks! David
pedrodelmonte (2016-11-26 17:19:48+00:00): I was working on something else and didn't notice the change. Thank you for pointing it out. I think I have fixed this one, but feel free to check it for me. I am learning OSM and am surely making unintentional mistakes. Thanks.
pedrodelmonte (2016-11-26 17:55:41+00:00): Unintentional. Please feel free to correct them as needed. I am a new user.
GerdP (2017-10-20 09:45:46+00:00): Hi!
Please review:
Some roads in this area are mapped as highway="service road" instead of service and they are not connected to the other ways. They also have names like "dead end" or "Service Road" which seem to be fantasy names.
I also wonder if ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127450076
should be mapped as path. The width seems to be ~4m. My understanding is that they are service roads to access the power towers/poles and that they are also used for hiking/cycling.
GerdP (2017-11-04 08:02:23+00:00): I've changed the ways with highway="service road", see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53497447
mueschel (2016-12-02 18:50:33+00:00): Hi,
you used the tags name_alt and name_alt:fr
Usually the key "alt_name" is used. Maybe you want to change this?

Jan
Kevo (2016-12-02 18:54:48+00:00): Oops, thanks for catching that.  I'll fix that when I have some free time this weekend. :)
Kevo (2016-12-04 04:47:51+00:00): Fixed those tags on the 401.
Supaplex (2016-11-26 04:47:04+00:00): railway=subway_entrance
ref=D
lleung (2016-12-18 05:07:08+00:00): thanks, done.
Alecs01 (2016-11-26 13:00:42+00:00): L'hai già mappata qualche giorno fa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4494827289 per favore non creare duplicati, se la posizione non è precisa si può spostare, puoi farlo collegandoti da openstreetmap.org, per ora ho cancellato il doppione.
Marry-poppin (2016-11-26 07:31:45+00:00): steal ?
jptolosa (2016-11-26 07:34:36+00:00): ?
pitscheplatsch (2016-11-26 16:06:52+00:00): Hi Vincent Zhao, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways and pois in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43958005
SomeoneElse (2016-12-14 00:35:03+00:00): @pitscheplatsch Does this (and possibly 43958066) still need reverting?  Someone mentioned on IRC a few days ago that it might - There are a lot of deletes here and I'm guessing that the other one is a redraw.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-14 20:21:39+00:00): @SomeoneElse Yes, I think so. I didn't revert anything.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-14 20:21:57+00:00): @SomeoneElse Thx!
SomeoneElse (2016-12-17 13:11:31+00:00): @pitscheplatsch Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44469749 .  Some of the data here still looks a bit iffy, but at least it's there.
uvi (2017-02-22 15:46:05+00:00): Hier steht woh ein Milchautomat neben dem Eierautomat; https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1799267036
Handelt es sich hierbei um einen richigen Milchautomaten oder nur um eine Verkaufsstelle?
Kommen Waren aus dem Regal, ist m.E. zusätzlich shop=farm mit der description, welche Sachen es dort gibt, korrekt. Sobald ein Automat steht, sollte der doch so auch erscheinen und recherchierbar sein. Einige vertreten auch die Meinung, dass der Punkt mit shop=dairy ergänzt werden sollte. Ich denke, es empfiehlt sich folgendes Beispiel ganz gut: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264211545 . 
Bist du ortskundig, kannst du das noch ändern?
Gruß Uwe
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:53:32+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Commodoortje (2016-11-26 23:46:10+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-11-26 23:46:37+00:00): kleine aanpassing verricht zodat het ook zichtbaar wordt.
Rainero (2016-11-27 22:51:29+00:00): Hallo Kulin Ban,
I have removed the bus lines 146, 194 from the key operator, which had been added by your edit.
Probably that is a bug in maps.me and not your fault. The bus lines are mapped with relations that contain the busstops and that is correct for the busstop "Truderinger Straße".

Regards,
Rainer
BáthoryPéter (2016-11-28 10:31:34+00:00): Kérlek hagyd abba a vandálkodást, nem akkora nagy poén egy iskolát szeméttelepre átnevezni, mint azt hiszed.
bergaufsee (2017-01-14 15:23:24+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier und in weiteren CS u.a. sehr viele Straßenlaternen gelöscht. Sind diese tatsächlich nicht (mehr) vorhanden?
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-03 22:15:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44147307 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of motorcycle parking locations from Bundesverband der Motorradfahrer. See discussion of changeset 44071123 for details.
az09 (2016-11-27 07:18:09+00:00): дубль получился
MikeN (2016-11-26 11:33:24+00:00): Hi, has this import been reviewed by the process in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

Thanks,
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-04-21 07:33:01+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1752173 ?
richlv (2016-11-26 17:37:23+00:00): there doesn't seem to be a building here - is this supposed to be the parking entrance ? in any case, the name is wrong.

also, any url for "pizza daugava" ?
richlv (2017-02-05 17:25:45+00:00): these objects do not seem to exist and have been removed.
if they do exist, please provide photo evidence (use the mapillary.com application) and url for the pizza place website
user_870861 (2016-11-30 10:01:19+00:00): hi, 
there is some mistake with this your changeset :
duplicated tags and geometry 
- inside changeset 43886022 
- between this changesets : 43962925 vs 43960307 ; 43965236 vs 43960307 ; 43965236 vs 43962925
issues can be see at
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?item=0&country=usa_north_carolina
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
nammala (2016-12-19 04:20:18+00:00): Hi Jesse Baker,

May I know the reason behind adding names like 500,550 etc to the bus_stop. 

Regards,
nammala
literan (2016-11-26 12:40:12+00:00): некорректная правка
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-03 22:16:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44147307 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of motorcycle parking locations from Bundesverband der Motorradfahrer. See discussion of changeset 44071123 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-03 22:15:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44147307 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of motorcycle parking locations from Bundesverband der Motorradfahrer. See discussion of changeset 44071123 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-03 22:16:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44147307 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of motorcycle parking locations from Bundesverband der Motorradfahrer. See discussion of changeset 44071123 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-03 22:16:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44147307 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of motorcycle parking locations from Bundesverband der Motorradfahrer. See discussion of changeset 44071123 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-03 22:16:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44147307 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of motorcycle parking locations from Bundesverband der Motorradfahrer. See discussion of changeset 44071123 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-03 22:16:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44147307 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of motorcycle parking locations from Bundesverband der Motorradfahrer. See discussion of changeset 44071123 for details.