piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2022-11-27 12:09:59+00:00): Hallo wermark,
Du hast diese Brücke
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131395015/history
im Sept. 2021 wegen Abriß gesperrt.
Hast Du aktuelle Ortskenntnisse und kannst sagen ob der Neubau schon fertiggestellt ist?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
- Gefunden mit brouter-suspects
- Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-12-04 09:56:58+00:00): Hallo wermark,
ich würde mich noch über eine Antwort freuen.
Grüße
felipeeugenio (2021-09-05 11:34:37+00:00): Hola.
Si tu conoces esos potreros y me dices que son footway, ok, pero en la experiencia en potreros; puede pasr un tractor
Si ese es el caso el valor es highway=track (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dtrack) por favor revisa el link. además, footway es como otro concepto (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway)

siempre con access=private si son predios privados.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110733717
gordo anorexico (2021-09-05 14:14:59+00:00): Si conozco esos lugares, y no pueden pasar tractores
felipeeugenio (2021-09-05 14:37:49+00:00): ok. estudiar por favor el uso del tag path (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dpath)
puede que sea más apropiado.
saludos
gordo anorexico (2021-09-05 14:49:36+00:00): Dale.
4004 (2022-05-22 22:37:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9063273258/ это не столб? https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=967726283936023&focus=photo
redrace (2022-01-05 11:14:09+00:00): HUHU
Ich habe den Blitzer mal an der richtigen Position eingetragen. Der steht mitten im Ort!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115792465#map=17/48.10488/8.20691&layers=N

Magst Du den hier löschen?!
Gruß Meik
berjk (2022-01-05 22:59:21+00:00): ich stehe gerade auf dem Schlauch. Ich habe einen Blitzer an einer falschen Position eingetragen?
Falls ja, kannst auch du den Blitzer an der falschen Position selbstverständlich selbst löschen.
Ich finde gerade nicht den Blitzer, den du meinst.
redrace (2022-01-06 07:33:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9063306689#map=18/48.10831/8.20706
Den hier. Ich kümmere mich drum!
jleedev (2021-09-05 12:10:58+00:00): Hello, if necessary please also update the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5632798 to follow this segment.
vulasala (2021-09-06 05:12:30+00:00): Hi Snekkern66,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 979724675, way 979724676
way 979724677 from residential to unclassified in order to fix classification gaps.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110734828
AkuAnakTimur (2021-09-07 14:34:41+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Straight to this: I've seen some highways around Aman Central was changed from "unclassified" highways to "residential" highways.  

Examples:
1. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/326097225

2. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/392815931

and probably one or two others.

May I know the reason why these changes were made?
KL Teh (2021-09-09 07:32:20+00:00): I've just read the documentation about "unclassified" highways and these roads probably should have been "unclassified" highways.

Quote:
1. "Use residential rather than unclassified on the road section if there are traffic restrictions (such as slower speed limits) or traffic calming features near small settlements. " from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential

I changed it because I've seen similar roads in downtown Georgetown, Ipoh and KL are residential road.

Examples: 
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23136460

2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41570128

3. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77194120

4. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771722920

Btw thanks for commenting
AkuAnakTimur (2021-09-15 14:23:28+00:00): I see. No problem, I'll change these back again sooner or later.
KL Teh (2021-09-16 10:11:11+00:00): Ok thanks
pesec (2021-09-06 05:06:06+00:00): Добрый день.
Данной правкой вы сместили фасад здание ближе к дороге, хотя на спутниковых снимках отчетливо видно, что фасад проходит в одну линию с соседним домом. Так же вы нарушили проезд под зданием.
На основании каких данных были сделаны ваши изменения?
mavl (2021-09-06 08:28:08+00:00): Здравствуйте, smikmays.  
Изменения, сделанные этим пакетом правок, отменены.
smikmays (2021-09-06 08:49:53+00:00): отмену правок поддерживаю. Но надо будет изменить конфигурацию дома 1.
CoyKoi (2021-09-06 01:45:27+00:00): Hi there, I've just reviewed some of your recent speed limit changes. It appears in some cases you are reverting speed limits on roads which have had their speed limits changed recently.
Note that Google Street View may be out of date (and should not be used as a reference for OSM). 
For example for Taupaki Rd, you can refer to AT's speed limit dataset, or Mapillary imagery:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-36.788505&lng=174.57614129997&z=17&pKey=4164112810375545&focus=photo&x=0.5206159084750398&y=0.6207757985440073&zoom=0


AT Open Data:
https://data-atgis.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/d43c489e7027489b88bcdedffc3be6c6_3/explore?location=-36.794481%2C174.580213%2C15.42
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110735129
sjhas (2021-09-07 20:37:49+00:00): Hi there, I had noticed in some cases I seemed to be changing things back to previous values. My input was feedback from a colleague who'd been picked up as speeding in our fleet tracking software, which uses OSM. He indicated this area was 70, which I corroborated with Google Street View,  which in this case is more up to date than Mappillary. I'd not seen the AT Speed Limit database, but this unsurprisingly is also out of date.

https://www.google.co.nz/maps/@-36.7881432,174.5764548,3a,75y,164.58h,90t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sbYqXye4BFszaN6yeDYkBcg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

Waka kotahi is apparently working on a national speed limit register, so hopefully they can do better!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110735129
CoyKoi (2021-09-08 03:32:59+00:00): Thanks for following up sjhas, appreciate the background, it's interesting to hear how OSM tags are being used and how the feedback becomes an improvement of the data.

In this case the Streetview image (Jan 2020) is in fact older than the Mapillary image (Nov 7 2020). The 60km/h speed limit was introduced in June 2020.

Another useful reference is this AT map of recent speed limit changes around Auckland: https://atgis.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=a13aa8469db642f283ef3ad241b71882

I did review your other changesets, and looks like they're all in line with the recent changes - thanks for keeping the map up to date :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110735129
sjhas (2021-09-08 21:19:14+00:00): Hi again, good spotting and great persistence. I'd put too much faith in the staff feedback and I'd missed the further advanced development of the childcare centre out of the field of view in the Mappilary images and thought google had its dates wrong, it does look like it's 60km/h!

Does the change get reverted, or updated back to 60?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110735129
CoyKoi (2021-09-09 00:36:12+00:00): No worries! Reverting is an option but it's much more complicated and only really required when there's been changes to geometry and/or deleted features. In this case just updating the tag value is totally fine - cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110735129
sjhas (2021-09-14 02:42:13+00:00): Reverted this now, thanks for spotting.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110735129
gscholz (2021-12-24 06:30:41+00:00): Hi  FS Patagonia,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Villa Obrera":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-68.09876&lat=-38.81995&zoom=13&opacity=0.57

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110735805

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
FS Patagonia (2021-12-24 16:03:06+00:00): Relaciones reparadas. Saludos!
Kautilya3 (2021-09-15 15:11:06+00:00): Why is the way 961491449 named 	基古纳鲁公路? Is there source for it?
NM$L (2021-09-19 17:06:08+00:00): 这些名字来自于一些微博的军事博主，并且也依照附近地名来命名；但是由于内容发布时间较早，具体的那条微博我现在找不到了，请谅解。
Eiim (2021-09-05 15:14:02+00:00): Oh hey, it's PiGuy! Welcome back to Oxford! (At least in terms of editing, no idea where you are physically)
Warin61 (2021-09-10 07:44:04+00:00): Hi
Part reversion to restore bus route 686. This was correct before this changset - public transport version 2. 

I see no route 695 in this changeset..
radiotrefoil (2021-09-10 07:47:53+00:00): Thanks for checking, I think I just won't add bus route relations on iD because it breaks things. Route 695 is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13165700
Warin61 (2021-09-10 07:53:34+00:00): I never bothered with iD, went straight to JOSM. 
I did a thing on entering public transport routes - see - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Warin61/diary/45106
Warin61 (2021-09-10 08:13:24+00:00): Oh.. I'm using OSMInspector to check these routes - 2 bus routes that I added .. and some train routes that I corrected. So that is how I noticed.
radiotrefoil (2021-09-10 08:16:36+00:00): Thanks, I'll keep that in mind for the next time I attempt to add route relations, will use JOSM
DUGA (2021-09-12 18:09:37+00:00): May I ask for the reason drawing the road area here?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979743815#map=19/40.02540/-76.53229
flohoff (2021-09-06 08:34:23+00:00): Moin,
ich bin gerade hier drüber gestolpert weil das weitreichende routingänderungen nach sich gezogen hat.

Das "construction=*" reicht nur das routing kaputt zu machen aber nicht das rendering in der Karte - Daher war das schwer zu finden.

Was ist denn hier? Ist das gesperrt? Wird da gebaut? Wie lange? 

Flo
flohoff (2021-09-06 08:35:18+00:00): Das ist so eine der routen - Rot ist alt - Grün ist neu.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=303780,324653#52.02364,8.52367,14z
DeFra85 (2021-09-06 08:39:34+00:00): Alle Infos dazu sollten eigentlich in Notiz und Quelle der bearbeiteten Straße sein.
DeFra85 (2021-09-06 08:43:03+00:00): Die Dornberger Straße wird neu asphaltiert. Wenn dieses Teilstück fertig ist, wechselt die Baustelle zwischen Tierpark und Ortseingang Hoberge.
Eine Sanierung der Straße Johannistal ist, soweit ich weiß, nicht geplant.
flohoff (2021-09-06 08:44:20+00:00): Das ist der changeset kommentar !??!

" L778: Sperrung der Dornberger Straße zwischen Hoberge-Uerentrup und Johannistal in Bielefeld "

Thats it - Wie lange ? Beidseitig ? 

Ich bin bei solchen dingern immer sehr vorsichtig und ich halte das tagging auch für unvollständig.

Wenn dann sollte das "highway" noch in ein "highway=construction" geändert werden damit in der KArte auch klar wird das das hier unpassierbar ist. Im moment ist es nur im router quasi unpassierbar.

Flo
DeFra85 (2021-09-06 08:59:06+00:00): highway=construction erledigt.

folgender Link war/ist auch IN den Eigenschaften der Straße selbst enthalten: https://www.strassen.nrw.de/de/presse/meldungen/meldung/l778-sperrung-der-dornberger-strasse-zwischen-hoberge-uerentrup-und-johannistal-in-bielefeld.html
cyton (2022-08-04 01:05:25+00:00): moin, 152300560 kann nicht bicycle=use_sidepath haben, da in osm kein sewparater radweg gemappt ist. und auf mapillary sehe ich gar keinen, insofern ist das auch falsch
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110737155
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 11:07:07+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9063595290/history has barrier=g that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
what this tag means? Is it maybe supposed to be barrier=gate? Or is maybe some other barrier?
MichaelCollinson (2024-02-04 04:33:23+00:00): Thanks for for checking Mateusz. Yes, a typo and corrected now. /Mike
Gonéo (2021-10-21 09:44:09+00:00): La description du groupe de modifications n'est pas explicite. Cette description est sensée expliquer aux autres contributeurs ce qui a été fait.

Par exemple pourquoi avoir changé l'accès motor_vehicule=no et supprimé la note associée ? À ce jour le pont est toujours fermé aux véhicules motorisés. Un autre contributeur l'a d'ailleurs corrigé ce jour.
Gonéo (2021-10-21 09:48:26+00:00): OK effectivement il a été rouvert puis de nouveau fermé. :-)

Mais il aurait été plus explicite de faire un changeset avec comme titre "réouverture à la circulation du pont de Couzon "par exemple.
Skwaloo (2021-10-21 12:44:13+00:00): Ok, merci
olo81 (2022-05-02 00:56:55+00:00): nazwa opisowa, brak tagowania związanego z działalnością hotelową itd.
C2oc4 (2022-06-08 07:05:00+00:00): a teraz?
MxxCon (2021-11-07 20:16:46+00:00): Hello.
Please write more detailed explanation of what you changed than just "меняю".

Please see this article for more details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments if that's easier for you to understand. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110738560
TZorn (2021-09-06 14:19:57+00:00): Hallo Who5678. Deine Änderungen hier stellen die Situation auch nicht korrekt dar. Du hast den Weg östlich komplett gelöscht, am Weg 175807732 steht aber sidewalk=no. Ich denke, ich hätte den separaten Weg gelassen und einfach zum Fußweg umgewidmet.
user_14056994 (2021-09-06 22:51:38+00:00): Stimmt, ist geändert auf beidseitigen Fußweg. Ein eigener Fußweg passt bei einer Wohnstraße nicht wirklich.
Noen (2021-09-08 21:55:57+00:00): Her hadde det gått an flytte bittelitt på rundkjøringen uten å ødelegge 6 bussrute-relasjoner.
philippec (2021-09-05 10:28:03+00:00): Geel  donorcentrum aed, verkeerde mapillary.
dentonny (2021-09-06 19:25:47+00:00): oops, foutje bij de copy/paste blijkbaar.

merci
Mordechai23 (2021-09-12 16:15:00+00:00): Nie prawda - masz napisane na

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Drogi_samochodowe

wytłuszczonym tekstem, że "Klasyfikacja dróg w OSM nie jest kopią klasyfikacji urzędowej".

A DW377 ma przebieg nie łączący żadnych większych miejscowości, jedynie 4 wioski z miastem Nowe - czyli typowe tertiary i unclassified
maraf24 (2021-09-12 18:08:32+00:00): Ludzie widzą to, co chcą widzieć.
Trzeba by w ogóle usunąć słowo "wojewódzka" z wiki, by nie mieli takich skojarzeń.
philippec (2021-09-05 10:08:43+00:00): Aalst parking Keizershallen aed, ondanks de 180 graden mapillary is de situatie mij niet duidelijk.  
Tegen welk gebouw leunt het aan ?
geerhoeb (2021-09-05 10:20:30+00:00): Als je van het keizersplein komt heb je links en rechts een voetpad naar de parking  en kijk je er recht op. Het staat dicht tegen het linker voetwegje.
trial (2022-01-17 21:04:10+00:00): pour info : https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/9062292246
Gonéo (2021-09-06 09:39:56+00:00): Merci pour la contribution. 

Attention, il existait déjà un restaurant à MobHotel : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5599095622. Le site web n'en mentionne qu'un. Je suppose que le restaurant a changé de nom. Il ne devrait donc pas y avoir 2 points restaurant dans ce bâtiment. 

Quelques remarques pour améliorer:

- un nom ne devrait avoir que sa 1ère lettre en majuscules, et ne pas contenir d'autres informations (retirer le @mobhotel). Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names
- un restaurant bio se précise avec organic=only. Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:organic
Gonéo (2021-09-06 12:25:43+00:00): Je vois que tu as mis à jour le resto qui existait déjà. (J'ai ajouté l'info sur le bio). On peut supprimer celui-ci donc ?
user_13982757 (2021-09-06 12:31:49+00:00): Oui, j'ai déjà fait la demande de suppression du lieu que j'avais créé, mais via l'appli Organic Maps, j'imagine qu'il y a un délai.

Dans tous les cas pour les modifications/créations un peu plus complexes, je passerai maintenant par le site openstreetmap, pour que tout soit propre (et complet).

Et je vais surtout me familiariser avec les subtilités de la création/modification en général!
Gonéo (2021-09-06 13:44:03+00:00): Je ne sais pas comment fonctionnent les ajouts/modifications/suppressions via Organic Maps. Je n'ai jamais testé.

Pour les subtilités, le wiki est ton ami. Il faut retenir qu'il est souvent plus complet en anglais qu'en français. Il y a aussi le forum https://forum.openstreetmap.fr
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-28 17:25:30+00:00): Hi, just a note that for most of the tunnel entrances at the Yale residential colleges, you can use tunnel=building_passage, and also they generally shouldn't have layer=-1 because they're on the same layer as the ground:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
Tomasz Herud (2021-10-28 18:54:51+00:00): Hej, dlaczego dodałeś tutaj ścieżkę rowerową po południowej stronie jezdni? Ona przecież jest tutaj po stronie północnej.
C2oc4 (2021-11-07 07:21:42+00:00): Cześć, jeśli tak to przepraszam za błąd bo co do dokładnej lokalizacji ścieżki to nie pamiętam bo raz jest ona opisana jako chodnik z dopuszczonym ruchem rowerowym raz nie ma żadnego znaku.
Tomasz Herud (2021-11-07 07:53:26+00:00): Jeżeli do teraz nie postawili żadnego znaku, to raczej go już nie postawią i to będzie po prostu chodnik.
sjakobi (2022-07-01 17:31:24+00:00): I think you accidentally used an unconvential surface tag here: surface=2.

Could you take a look at fixing this? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3246213.
olo81 (2026-05-31 15:14:31+00:00): kolejne nazwy opisowe parkingów do poprawy
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
C2oc4 (2026-06-14 06:22:46+00:00): oki
user_177389 (2021-09-05 09:00:20+00:00): Wikipedia:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verwaltungsgemeinschaft_Gramme-Aue

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verwaltungsgemeinschaft_An_der_Marke

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verwaltungsgemeinschaft_Gramme-Vippach
Lee Carré (2021-09-05 22:11:41+00:00): 👍🙂
ravali_78 (2021-09-06 10:28:35+00:00): Hi Aaron Sum,
Trust your doing well.I have fixed invalid turn restrictions,crossing ways and highway classifications.Kindly check with way 633802797,way 630093161,node 9066303047,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110793219.  
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110741419
TZorn (2021-09-06 14:50:22+00:00): Hi. zone:maxspeed zeigt an, dass die Straße einer Tempo-Zone angehört. Die eigentliche Höchstgeschwindigkeit sollte trotzdem noch mit maxspeed=30 getaggt werden.
Florimondable (2021-10-21 11:59:50+00:00): Bonjour Géovélo,

Je vois qu’une piste à été ajouté à OSM sur la rue d’Amsterdam.
Autant que je le sache, et je suis très au courant des nouvelles infras vélo à Paris ;), ce n’est pas une piste mais une "bande cyclable" (ancienne voie de circulation).
Géovélo (2021-10-28 07:56:55+00:00): Bonjour Florimondable, en fait je ne suis pas retourné rue d'Amsterdam depuis quelques mois mais à l'époque c'etait un truc bizarre genre coronapiste en "contre-sens". On peut mettre opposite-lane non? Au plaisir de vous lire. Bien cordialement Benoit
Florimondable (2021-10-28 10:20:14+00:00): Oui c’est une infra temporaire, avec un sens en circulation générale et l’autre sens en bande cyclable. On peut revenir aux tags précédent oui.
JJJWegdam (2022-01-06 12:19:18+00:00): Are you aware of the difference between railway=railway_crossing and railway=switch | railway:switch=double_slip? It seems like you taggen all slip switches as railway=railway_crossing
Denis_Helfer (2022-01-06 17:43:10+00:00): Yes I am. I work at SNCF Réseau.
When the switch is detailed, this node  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2487004001 is correct avec the 2 switchs https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2485936747 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2485936749.
Sometimes, I map like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1097987078.
But I may have mistakes. Could you point me one of theses ?
JJJWegdam (2022-01-06 18:07:39+00:00): Ah, cool. I work at ProRail (NL).\\

An example might be [this crossing](openstreetmap.org/node/2090471084). It looks like it has point machines near the common crossing and therefore looks like a slip switch.\\

The mapping with 2 switches is (sadly) not the correct way of tagging slip switches. There should only be one node with railway=switch and either railway:switch=double_slip or railway:switch=single_slip at the location where you would place a railway crossing. The ref of both switches can still be tagged by using ref=<name>;<name> An example can be found [here](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4463841955). I personally don't mind if you leave it like you currently did it, but others might.
Tom Delmas (2022-01-03 10:14:31+00:00): Bonjour,
Cette rue semi-piétonne est à double sens pour les cyclistes. 
Merci de mettre des descriptions plus explicites que "." pour les changements.
DP24PH (2021-09-25 06:38:20+00:00): Reminder from PH mapper: Kindly reduce the changeset boundary to your local area to avoid encroaching the entire Republic of the Philippines whereas several mappers are monitoring the map changes into their respective areas of responsibility.


DP24
kubahahaha (2021-10-08 07:46:30+00:00): Tutaj coś poszło nie tak
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979769958
charl3s (2021-10-08 08:32:39+00:00): Dzięki, sprawdzę później
charl3s (2021-10-10 07:31:15+00:00): Co poszło nie tak? Że drzewa są na budnku? Były wcześniej dodane, ktoś wybudował dom, ja dodałem dom. Mnie zbytnio nie kręcą drzewa, ławki itd w OSM.
kubahahaha (2021-10-10 07:59:14+00:00): Tak, że drzewa są na budynku - trasie rzeczy też przy importach trzeba ręcznie poprawiać
kubahahaha (2021-10-06 01:26:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979770100
Tego budynku nie ma, prawda?
kubahahaha (2021-10-06 01:28:30+00:00): albo tu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979770079
kubahahaha (2021-10-08 07:46:50+00:00): Kolejne. Przejrzysz, czy lepiej cały import wycofać?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979769983
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979770058
charl3s (2021-10-10 07:35:54+00:00): Poprawiłem, w jednym trochę podjazd źle narysowałem i wchodził na budynek
Andrea Musuruane (2021-09-06 09:21:22+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, non modificare queste feature. Le etichette erano corrette. La comunità italiana inserisce le panchine giganti in questo modo. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110742199
Kovoschiz (2021-09-06 06:36:10+00:00): Thanks, but please don't delete these in the future. It contains an address, and the shop space is still there.
TXBG (2021-09-05 10:25:29+00:00): Zamolio bih te da ne menjaš nazive ulica. Pogledaj na https://a3.geosrbija.rs
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110742333
s8evq (2021-09-09 10:43:51+00:00): Ik zou deze changeset graag terugdraaien. Het is inderdaad "uitgezonder plaatselijk verkeer", maar dit staat onder een bord C5. Dus vandaar dat ik "motor_vehicle=destination" toegevoegd, maar bijvoorbeeld motorfietsen mogen nog door bij een C5 (dus motorcycle=yes etc...). Daarenboven staat het bordje pas in de bocht, ongeveer aan Traiteur Stefaan.
fvusser (2021-09-09 11:17:27+00:00): Super, het was een beetje te ruw genoteerd
olo81 (2022-10-02 22:04:52+00:00): do poprawy, nazwa opisowa,
access=no zamienić na private
Fra00 (2021-09-07 11:16:17+00:00): Ciao. Il tratto SS710-SS87 tra contrada Cacciapesci e Baranello era taggato come trunk anche prima. Dici che nemmeno quello merita di restarlo?
ualios (2021-09-07 16:21:25+00:00): In quel tratto di strada, appena 10 km, ci sono ben 5 accessi (3 in tangenziale e due sulla SS87) al servizio di privati e privi delle corsie necessarie. Francamente troppi per taggare trunk!