piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-05-21 09:43:10+00:00): Dag GB,

Probeer toch concreet aan te geven wat je aan het doen bent. Dus bv oneway=yes verwijderd.
Maak ook het gebied van je edits niet te groot. Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat levert vaak schade op. 
MVG,
Eggie
b-jazz (2019-05-21 16:29:30+00:00): I was expecting to see something basketball related being mapped, not golf. ;-)
Phyks (2019-05-21 12:05:23+00:00): Tu es sûr pour la suppression du compressed air sur la station ?

Prix carburants en ligne dit qu'il y en a bien https://www.prix-carburants.gouv.fr/recherche/ et il me semble que François avait vérifié sur place récemment.
overflorian (2019-05-21 12:15:06+00:00): Je l'ai mappé séparément : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6487346553
All good ?
Phyks (2019-05-21 12:16:28+00:00): Oups, je l'avais raté dans OSMCha. Désolé !
Phyks (2019-05-21 12:11:58+00:00): Bonjour,

Il peut être utile d'ajouter la smoothness ou tracktype sur les chemins (qui sont a priori de mauvaise qualité) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness.

Pour la rue ajoutée qui est interrompue par la voie ferrée, il est probablement utile d'ajouter l'information qu'elle ne débouche pas dans un champs "note" dessus. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noexit peut être utile à rajouter aussi.

Bonne journée,
-- 
Phyks
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-22 13:32:37+00:00): Please make it clear in your comment what you were updating, and from what source.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70467759
Dimacn (2019-05-21 12:07:10+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте на карту фейковые объекты, которых не существует. Ваших парков отдыха и линий деревьев (с дикой геометрией) не существует. Ваши правки будут отменены.
Piagno (2019-05-21 08:12:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1640218 https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1655771
stephankn (2020-09-07 18:54:50+00:00): way 691379856 is not a 39/1 meter height building.
Also: they key to tag house-numbers is "addr:housenumber". Please use the right tags and not abuse the name tag. Please revisit this area and fix your tagging. While you are at it, please also make the building footprints rectangular ('q' key)
Alecs01 (2019-05-27 18:14:52+00:00): Ciao, in OSM village è un centro abitato più importante di hamlet, per Vedano Olona direi che ha più senso village come era prima https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/62517316/history (vedi anche i paesi vicini) mentre hamlet è un gruppo di case più piccolo come questo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4250570932 altrimenti sembra che Fondo Campagna sia più importante di Vedano Olona
Leo Slager (2021-01-22 00:22:50+00:00): Iemand heeft ontdekt dat je een weg over een weg hebt ingetekend.
Kun je 1 van de 2 verwijderen ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2507019#map=17/51.36371/5.16534
Rom1 (2019-05-21 13:10:22+00:00): Hi, mistake in opening_hours tag with two "Sa" ?
mavl (2019-11-08 18:30:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Frans S (2019-06-04 14:50:41+00:00): Hello Mich74. Thanks for mapping here. A remark. When you map highways (paths) to a hamlet, coming from different directions, please connect them to each other.
Best regards
Mich74 (2019-06-04 16:05:53+00:00): Ok sortfor the mistake. Michele
mavl (2019-11-08 18:30:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-22 13:29:28+00:00): Please could you be clearer on what imagery you use. This looks like it could potentially be a service road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70469990
jguthula (2019-05-23 14:21:06+00:00): Hi LivingWithDragons,

Thanks for looking into this edit. The workflow which our editors follow, includes verification of all satellite imagery sources that are existing in iD. That is the reason the imagery_used has two different imagery sources. In this particular case the imagery is not good enough to come to a conclusion. The missing road is identified but if it is leading to a single entity or multiple houses is not clear. So we valued the local community member edits in the surrounding areas and added it as a residential road. If you think it is wrong please do change the road classification. 

We are actively looking forward to work along with the community and learn more from them. If you have any further concerns please do reach out to us.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
stephankn (2021-06-30 06:53:54+00:00): Please confirm that all that M17, M18, M19, ... as well as H... are actual house numbers in this area. In northern Thailand, we only have numbers, no letters.
Zabir91 (2019-05-21 09:41:28+00:00): (Please do not add english name in the name=* field, always use name=* for Bengali name and name:en=* for English name.)

A whole standard entry would include:

name=<Bangla>
name:bn=<Bangla>
name:en=<English>

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
cquest (2019-08-24 13:37:32+00:00): C'est plutôt un chemin agricole, donc highway=track... modification faite !
aharvey (2020-07-22 01:05:26+00:00): Hi could you explain the reasoning for changing the maxweight tag? The one you've changed it to I couldn't find any documentation for and I think the standard https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight tag is correct here. From my understanding this is a general weight restriction hence Key:maxweight.
aharvey (2020-07-25 10:30:12+00:00): I did some more reading and found this tag came from the proposal at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/gross_weight, where the maxgcweightrating:goods tag is documented as "the prohibition applies only if the permissible maximum mass of the vehicle or combination of vehicles exceeds that figure." with further comments that "Does not apply to buses or other vehicle types except goods vehicles.". however according to https://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/roads/safety-rules/road-rules/heavy-vehicles/index.html these light traffic roads signs mean "If weight restriction sign is displayed for a road, you must not use that road if the total weight of your vehicle, including its load, is the same as or heavier than the weight shown on the sign." so it never say it only applies to goods vehicles, and it means the total weight of the vehicle including load which is what maxweight means. So I'm not sure this new tag is needed or that simply using maxweight here is incorrect.
aharvey (2020-07-30 05:59:04+00:00): I've reverted these changes due to reasoning discussed here.
Sosha1996 (2019-05-21 13:15:20+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف زیادی از داده‌های نقشه کرده‌اید.
داده‌هایی که حذف کردید شامل معابر، خطوط برق، ساختمان‌ها و رود‌ها میشود.
به دلیل حذف عمده‌ی داده‌های نقشه، نام شما در لیست سیاه OSM Iran قرار گرفته.
اگر تا ۲۴ساعت آینده(۶ صبح ۱خرداد ۹۸) جوابی به پیام‌های روی چنسجتتان ندهید، ابتدا تمام تغییرات شما در چنجست‌های: 70402806, 70402244, 70402023, 70401975, 70401935, 70401890, 70401867, 70401808, 70401797, 70401629, 70401290, 70401215, 70401142, 70401068, 70400917, 70400906, 70384712, 70384498, 70384136, 70379941, 70379784, 70379695, 70379507, 70379141, 70378976, 70378839, 70378778, 70378598, 70378565, 70378485, 70178989, 70178506, 70178347, 70177480, 70470921
برگردانده خواهد شد و سپس حساب شما به عنوان خرابکار گزارش خواهد.

سوشا
از OSM Iran
----------------------------
You removed a lot of data from the map.
The data you removed include buildings, streams, crossing, and power lines
Due to the deletion of large data from the map, your name is on the blacklist of OSM Iran
If you do not answer me within 24 hours, Your changes will be reverted and your account will be reported as a saboteur.

Sosha
from OSM Iran.

(by online translator)
kiaraSh-Q (2019-05-21 14:22:52+00:00): Hello! it seems you've deleted a bunch of useful data without any reason during these changesets!!!
70402806, 70402244, 70402023, 70401975, 70401935, 70401890, 70401867, 70401808, 70401797, 70401629, 70401290, 70401215, 70401142, 70401068, 70400917, 70400906, 70384712, 70384498, 70384136, 70379941, 70379784, 70379695, 70379507, 70379141, 70378976, 70378839, 70378778, 70378598, 70378565, 70378485, 70178989, 70178506, 70178347, 70177480
please don't do this again.

سلام دوست گرامی، لطفاً از حذف کردن دیتایی که افراد زیادی زحمت تهیه شو کشیدن خودداری کنید، این دیتا آسون به دست نیومده و افراد زیادی مدتها وقت و انرژی صرف کردن و کلی هزینه کردن تا این دیتا رو ایجاد کنن.
SomeoneElse (2019-05-21 13:25:38+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please do use meaingful changeset comments, not just "perwez" every time.
Changeset comments are important because they help other mappers to understand what you are doing.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-05-21 13:26:01+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap!
S'il vous plaît, utilisez des commentaires décevants, et pas seulement "à chaque fois".
Les commentaires de changeset sont importants car ils aident les autres mappeurs à comprendre ce que vous faites.
Meilleures salutations,
Andy
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-22 13:28:14+00:00): This also included changes near Barnsley. Please remember to save small amounts so it is easy for people to monitor changes in their area.
Thanks for helping OpenStreetMap.

-Gregory.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-21 09:49:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 70463044.
Hjart (2019-05-21 10:09:46+00:00): Her er tale om en helt ny sti langs Ørnesædevej?
M Larsen (2019-05-21 16:39:31+00:00): Her er tale om et kommunalt vedligeholdt stykke "ikke stenbelagt" fortov, som af en eller anden grund aldrig er blevet kortlagt.
Hjart (2019-05-21 18:06:35+00:00): "En eller anden grund" er at i OSM er hele det danske vejnet kortlagt af frivillige/hobbyfolk (meget store dele før vi fik adgang til de offentlige data) og at der simpelthen er langt færre aktive på Sjælland end i Jylland & på Fyn.
Desuden foretrækker vi normalt at angive på selve "bilvejen" at der er fortove, fremfor at tegne dem separat
osmviborg (2019-05-21 19:47:44+00:00): På denne side https://kort.solrod.dk kan man  bla. vælge at se "Fortove langs veje". Der er ingen fortove langs Ørnesædevej.
M Larsen (2019-05-22 07:20:07+00:00): Ja tak for det store arbejde. 
Langs Ørnesædevej er der brede græsrabatter på begge sider, hvor "fortovene" bliver kommunalt vedligeholdt og altså hverken decideret fortov eller sti. Kan måske betegnes som et rekreativt færdeselsområde. 
Ørnesædevej munder i øvrigt i den nordlige ende ud i endnu et offentligt område, som forbinder stien langs boldbanen, samt endnu en sti som ikke er kortlagt.
Hvordan skal det beskrives?
osmviborg (2019-05-22 09:33:47+00:00): Personligt ville jeg ikke kortlægge en trampesti langs en villavej. Men hvis du gerne vil, så brug highway=path
surface=grass ikke footway
Hjart (2019-05-22 09:59:33+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig at angive det grønne område som park. Det ligner ganske vist ikke en egentlig park, men umiddelbart kan jeg ikke komme på noget bedre. Måske det bare er eng/skov ?
trigpoint (2019-05-26 12:18:55+00:00): Maybe do more than the absolute minimum and extend the residential area?

Cheers Phil
pddondet (2019-07-02 11:20:03+00:00): Hi Phil,

Thanks for looking into my edit and making the changes.Please let me know if you have any further suggestions.

Regards,
pddondet
trigpoint (2019-06-28 12:29:55+00:00): Hi, there is no need to add station to the name of a station. We know what it is.
I have restored the correct name.
Frans S (2019-06-29 11:51:58+00:00): Hi, Thanks for mapping here. A request.
When mapping/adjusting a highway and that highway crosses a stream or river, please tag a crossing on that point
best regards
BonanzaPeak (2019-07-03 11:53:50+00:00): Thanks, Frans S. I have added the required tags.
oiooio (2019-08-21 11:22:11+00:00): Hallo Reiner Laasch,

sind das wirklich alles Äcker, die du in diesem CS hinzugefügt hast? Beispielsweise sieht mir "Blofeld 7 'An der Flutbach'" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687921217)  eher wie eine Wiese/Weide (landuse=meadow) aus. Selbiges gilt für eine Vielzahl anderer durch dich eingetragener Äcker um Blofeld.

Viele Grüße und frohes Mappen!
oiooio
Miselajus (2019-08-28 07:38:30+00:00): Hallo. Abschreibungen von den Flurkarten sind in OSM nicht zulässig. Bitte die entsprechenden Eintragungen wieder löschen. Gruß M.
oiooio (2019-09-20 18:44:41+00:00): Da bislang keine Antwort kam, habe ich alle Flurnamen entfernt und die Flure so angepasst, dass diese jetzt einfach nur die richtigen Landuses wiederspiegeln. Manche mussten auch komplett gelöscht werden.
Kartenziegel (2019-05-21 10:53:33+00:00): Please don't do this. The quality is abysmal and with little human effort you could reach a much better result.
Kartenziegel (2019-05-21 13:35:19+00:00): La route https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691410352 n'est clairement pas une voie rapide ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk ).
viloan (2019-05-21 11:11:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mbethke (2019-05-22 18:00:36+00:00): Hi, thanks for your additions! I just noticed a lot of your POIs have your name as "operator" - that tag is meant for the person or company in charge of running it though. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator
cheers,
Matthias
Ibrahim Saed (2019-06-03 12:36:17+00:00): please restore this edtis you made !!
ArchesPark (2019-06-03 17:02:30+00:00): I can restore the edits, what specifically do you have an issue with in this changeset? Do you have any mapping suggestions for working in this area?
eggie (2019-05-21 11:41:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
jvermaat (2019-05-21 14:34:19+00:00): Bedankt hiervoor.
eggie (2019-05-21 11:45:23+00:00): Het is inderdaad de Piet Kramerzoom.
Je kunt zo iets ook checken als je naar de Bag adresnodes kijk op de woningen.
Gr eggie
jvermaat (2019-05-21 14:33:17+00:00): De kadastralekaart is/was een beetje verwarrend. Vandaar weer teruggedraaid.
SK53 (2019-11-05 19:49:09+00:00): This plant is not yet under construction. See Sentinel-2 imagery from 2 days ago: https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2&lat=39.45130544035617&lng=-6.557507514953613&zoom=15&preset=1-NATURAL-COLOR&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=100&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2019-05-01%7C2019-11-03&atmFilter=&showDates=false.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:57:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:57:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:57:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Tomas Straupis (2019-05-21 15:56:02+00:00): Have you checked the data you're uploading?
For example this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691418426 is an archaeological site, not cemetery and it is clearly offset (according to imagery).
Shouldn't all imports be agreed with local community?
soshial (2019-05-21 17:23:28+00:00): All cemeteries were createed by hand. I am sorry if some were uploaded with an offset, but most of the data (that I was checking befoore upload) doesn't have an offset. This is senkapiu teritorija, as I understood, so I decided to inclide it. Please, do edit it as you see fit. Āčiū!
Tomas Straupis (2019-05-21 17:45:59+00:00): Imports must be consulted with local community beforehand. I would have to review and analyse all edits now, check if data is correct according to Lithuanian sources, change name:lt to name, check type, geometry etc. I could have imported the same data from Lithuanian (more correct) sources in one go if it would have been my priority, but it isn't...
Tomas Straupis (2019-05-21 17:56:01+00:00): And it is dated VIII-XII age, so clearly non catholic, but local/Lithuanian religion.
soshial (2019-05-21 17:56:39+00:00): If you don't mind explaining to me (for the sake of my future edits):
1) what is the difference between name and name:lang?
2) where do I contact local community? do i present my *.osc changeset file first?
soshial (2019-05-21 18:04:24+00:00): If you have some time to improve my edits at some point, you may see all my edits in Lietuva here: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Je7
Tomas Straupis (2019-05-21 18:10:09+00:00): 1. Name is a name in local language (in Lithuania - lithuanian, in Latvia - latvian). name:xx - foreign name.
2. Depends on a country. In Lithuania it is a mailing list (talk-lt). There was some tool created to identify local communities/discussion channels globally, but I do not edit a lot abroad so do not remember the name. But you could probably find it in OSM wiki or with a help of google.
And yes, it would have been better to find somebody local and provide a data source so that we could verify the data and check the tags you're using against local conventions. And then I could have done import myself later after doing the necessary checks (or simply importing local data, because we do have it and it is much more detailed and precise...)

I have already updated https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691418426 and will go through the rest of changes in Lithuania, but in future please contact local community (for example me in Lithuania) before doing imports as non-consulted imports are violation of OSM rules and are usually reverted right away.
Tomas Straupis (2019-05-21 18:16:02+00:00): I continued checking and it gets worse: jewish genocide sites are tagged as christian cemeteries, objects are created where the same data already existed before etc.
So sorry, but I will remove most of your data in Lithuania.
soshial (2019-05-22 07:24:38+00:00): Thank you for clearing this out for me. I am sorry for bad data. Is it possible to remove those changeset from my edit history?
Tomas Straupis (2019-05-22 09:06:42+00:00): No, there is no way to remove changesets from your history. Unless admins would do that with direct changes in database which would need some exceptional reasons.
4004 (2019-05-25 17:30:00+00:00): i am reverting all of the imports because this is a mess. please go through https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and ask the local/worldwide community if you have questions BEFORE the actual import.
I can also tell you straightaway that your data has loads of duplicates
4004 (2019-05-25 18:45:45+00:00): oh, actually it's already done, good
ma-rt-in (2019-05-21 21:16:56+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe da ein paar Anmerkungen für dich:
Way 399413259 / 399413269: Du hast die Richtung geändert, was aber auf Grund der Richtung des Way´s ein Widerspruch ist. 
Ich habe die Änderungen entsprechend angepasst.
vg
ebelingt (HHA) (2019-05-22 05:37:21+00:00): Hallo,
die beiden Fahrtreppen sind abwärts und laut "https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:conveying" werden diese dann mit dem tag "conveying=backward" eingetragen. Bitte korrigieren.
ma-rt-in (2019-05-22 08:38:10+00:00): Hallo,
das mag zwar stimmen, jedoch hat jeder Way in OSM eine spezifische Richtung, wo nach sich die anderen Tags halten müssen.
Weitere Infos hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Elemente#Linie
vg
Dimacn (2019-05-21 12:17:22+00:00): Спасибо за уточнение карты. Однако пожалуйста ознакомьтесь с правилами наименования улиц в OSM - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Константин Гам (2019-08-07 17:06:25+00:00): Уточните пожалуйста откуда вы взяли данные для данного пакета правок?
4004 (2019-05-22 22:02:14+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
там серьезно 24 этажа и название на английском?
petrulin_alex (2019-05-23 08:14:23+00:00): Добрый день! Да этажность дома от 15 до 24 этажей. Название можно и на русском ЖК Браславский. Может вы знаете как добавить адрес дома, что бы он отображался на карте (визуально стояла цифра номера, как в других домах)?
4004 (2019-05-24 22:30:56+00:00): имеется в виду тестовый рендер на осм.орг? он видимо дома с такой формой не может с номером показывать.
вообще мы под определенный стиль карты не рисуем, но я добавил точку с адресом, может сработает.
7 кстати видно на гуманитарном стиле - можете попробовать
viloan (2019-05-21 12:19:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
CurlingMan13 (2023-05-13 04:42:26+00:00): FYI - individual sections of parking shouldn't be mapped as seperate parking lots since it is all one lot.
Humus015 (2023-05-17 04:24:09+00:00): Hi, not understand.  If they are at 90 degrees for example on the app are displayed with logo in the wrong way.  I saw in a shopping mall many declared separate. Thanks
szalona_entropia (2019-05-21 13:54:23+00:00): Edycja nieprawidłowa, węzeł został otwarty tylko częściowo.
乌克兰移民 (2019-05-21 12:43:54+00:00): https://drive.google.com/open?id=15BG9ocoOIkxlX5nON8fGrJ-DOKrEUd6P
PT-53 (2019-12-06 09:29:03+00:00): Hallo HansDerRadler,
Straßen im Bau werden mit der Merkmal-Kombination highway=construction + construction=residential markiert.
Du hast u.a. an dieser Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549125206/history
das Merkmal highway=construction in highway=residential abgeändert.
Wenn die Straßen - wie Du schreibst - fertiggestellt sind, sollte auch noch das Merkmal construction=residential gelöscht werden.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-15 10:49:28+00:00): Hallo HansDerRadler,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
HansDerRadler (2019-12-15 12:08:35+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, PT-53! Habe es korrigiert und auch gleich noch ein paar neue Fußwege ergänzt, die inzwischen gebaut wurden.