piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
btwhite92 (2021-09-14 15:29:35+00:00): I'm not asking you to tag for the renderer. Yes, 'protect_class=21' will not render on its own, though I would argue this is a protected and managed landscape (class 5) rather than just a community recreation area (21). The relation is still tagged with 'leisure=nature_reserve', which should render.  So, for the third time, the reason it is not rendering is because this changeset broke the relation. 

The correct way to expand the boundary would be to split the boundary around the outdated "Donner Summit Canyon" way, add the outer to the relation, remove the previously commonly shared portion of the boundary, and remove the outdated Donner Summit Canyon way/relation entirely. Instead, this changeset leaves the outdated way in place and adds a bunch of random natural/landuse=forest areas to the relation in a way that breaks the relation. This can be seen by simply clicking the link for the relation below and noting that the ways highlighted do not correspond to the boundary. That is what I'm asking you to fix, since those changes were made in this changest.
kolasau (2021-09-15 13:33:39+00:00): You're right! Thank you for helping us to understand the problem. Boundary is fixed, please let us know if we made mistakes, we will be happy to improve the data!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110293022
gscholz (2021-09-04 06:43:09+00:00): Hi PlayzinhoAgro,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.88929&lat=-5.29881&zoom=8&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As you may know these ways cannot be used by routing software.

Can you please fix this and may be think about how to avoid this error as this seems to be a typical part of your workflow?
Kind Regards
Guido
Someöne (2021-08-26 15:09:41+00:00): All data from local Survey
Allroads (2021-08-26 22:25:06+00:00): Als het er niet is, correct, ik zie het ook op de beelden van april 2021 verderop staat nog een paaltje. OSM routering alleen foot kan er langs voor fietser brommer zelfs motor, horse,  moeten dan access tags gezet worden op yes

Ook als er een doodlopend bord staat. 
Uitgezonderd fietssymbool. Dit is alleen informatief. Is geen gebod verbod.
https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.983816878&lng=6.291883885&z=19
Commodoortje (2021-08-29 10:08:25+00:00): Er is een parkeerplaats verlegd in zijn positie, dit is een welkome aanvulling op OpenStreetMap. Buiten jouw wijziging laat ik met dit filmpje nog een verbetering zien en hoe je dit kunt doen.
https://youtu.be/4gIcV38_wF8
HJGroenVRFR (2021-08-29 14:35:34+00:00): Duidelijk filmpje zit best veel werk/stappen in om goed neer te zetten.
NieWnen (2021-08-27 06:17:27+00:00): Bardzo dużo zostało zmienione w tej edycji, ale zmiana z path na footway w przypadku ciągów pieszo-rowerowych jest niepoprawna. Tak samo nie powinno rozdzielać ich na 2 linie, jeśli nie ma fizycznej separacji między nimi np. trawnika.
Dodatkowo zostały usunięte węzły świateł na skrzyżowaniu. Niestety jest tutaj sporo rzeczy do wycofania/poprawy.

Zachęcam do zapoznania się z wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery 
i innych stron wiki, a w przypadku wątpliwości zapraszam na forum osm, fb, discorda lub pytaj śmiało nawet i tutaj :).
kokoimatsuchi (2021-08-27 06:36:01+00:00): Nie jestem do końca pewien, o które światła chodzi, ale ścieżka będzie skorygowana
Mordechai23 (2021-08-27 09:33:22+00:00): Cześć, pozwoliłem sobie przefiltrować pozostałości tych błędnych footway'i

Też zapraszam na forum/discorda ;)
WoodWoseWulf (2021-08-26 20:50:57+00:00): Welcome back to OSM.

I note that you have returned to add fictional features in a similar manner to that which you did 4 years ago. These edits are characteristic of Pokemon GO related vandalism (fictional parks and footpaths over areas where they don't exist).

You'll likely find detection methods for these kinds of edits have improved during your absence.

Your fictional edits will be removed.
MxxCon (2021-08-27 03:44:13+00:00): Hello.
Why do you think that museum is more correct?
Looking at the website and reading the official description, it seems like 'gallery' is a more appropriate tag here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110294461
TheFactFinder (2021-08-27 07:30:45+00:00): I will be adding a museum and gallery tag. I believe it actually fits both. It is a non profit art museum, so it could really fall under both museum and gallery
MxxCon (2021-08-27 12:55:09+00:00): The logic why I originally changed this from museum to gallery is because for one, they don't call themselves a museum. I haven't found any mention of "museum" on their website. And the other reason is that they offer space for arts to work. I'm not sure if "museum" would for such a definition as opposed to "gallery", where it's common for artists to work in.
TheFactFinder (2021-08-27 14:02:51+00:00): https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizpJLmrtHyAhUCQkEAHbTsAtYQFnoECAUQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FList_of_museums_in_New_York_City&usg=AOvVaw2MxnURXT9sa-8V9TSPYMF9

I take my data from here, and it is classed as a museum there, so I put it as a museum here. However both views are acceptable, which is why I added a tag for a gallery as well as a museum
spacer1971 (2022-02-04 12:05:27+00:00): In diesem Abschnitt (vor der ehem. Post) ist die Straße "Am Festplatz" keine Einbahnstraße. Man kann von "Am Schellbusch" über "Am Festplatz" auf den Festplatz fahren. Ich bin Anwohner.
Frans S (2021-08-29 10:08:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
You mapped a number of circular buildings in the lower part.
These are rectangular buldings. (imagery is not that clear. See the Bing inmagery for more details)
I correct them
Best regards
thefabi (2024-02-28 10:52:16+00:00): Hallo dklosi

Warum hast du einen Google Link als Quelle angegeben? Ist dies deine Hauptquelle? 

Google ist für OpenStreetMap keine erlaubte Quelle. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

Ich habe den source Tag entfernt und den wechsel der erlauben Höchstgeschwindigkeit an die Position des Verkehrsschildes angepasst.
mvexel (2021-08-27 13:01:02+00:00): Hi, it would be helpful if you could upload your edits more frequently, thus creating smaller changesets which are easier to inspect for other mappers  to look at the edits you made. Thanks!
mvexel (2021-08-27 13:04:09+00:00): Also, something more descriptive  than "fix issues" would be highly appreciated. Thanks!
Allroads (2021-08-26 22:07:59+00:00): Nog even wat meer aangepast op basis van BGT omtrekgericht. Geknipt waar de de building passage echt begint en stop onder een luifel is het covered=yes

http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/NLOSMOK/OSMOKNL.html#map=21.20/52.9904/6.2920/0
building=roof layer=1 kan  worden ingetekend. Ik vraag me wel af wat de openingstijden van dit stuk is voor jullie wellicht belangrijk. Er is dan eigenlijk sprake van een entrance.
rivermont (2021-10-06 14:37:56+00:00): What is the source for these roads? They do not appear on latest imagery (which Bing is not) or in TIGER.

They are also certainly not secondary roads, and I don't think there is a boardwalk road here.
Yjack (2021-10-06 16:29:15+00:00): This area belongs to the "Coves Mountain River Club Association" and used to be a private golf course.  The developer has now turned it into about 25 lots and in the process is putting in a gate, a new bridge, and new roads. Right now the roads are gravel but will soon be paved to county standards. They will be private roads, maintained by the association with limited access.
maraf24 (2021-08-28 17:29:22+00:00): Kolejne błędne zmiany path na footway.
Frans S (2021-08-27 10:38:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping 
Please be more accurate in your mappings
Thanks for mapping here
Not all buildings have been correct mapped. 
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2sBest regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2021-08-27 10:41:50+00:00): Hi. Another issue
Not all traces you have mapped are buildings. Please check if an object has a shadow next to it and a path (traces) to it
Best regards
Carto'Cité (2021-11-29 17:11:44+00:00): Bonjour Romy G
Je me suis permis de connecter la piste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/976718568 au niveau de ce nœud https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1278210749. Si tu penses qu'il fallait laisser la piste déconnectée de la route, n'hésite pas à me dire.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
iWowik (2021-08-27 12:02:04+00:00): День добрый!
Вы вносите адресную информацию с ошибками.
1) в name надо писать только название объекта. Номер дома таковым не является.
2) Принят определенны порядок написания слов в названиях улиц.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Пример ваших ошибок.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/976720038
Omegatherion (2021-08-29 12:57:48+00:00): Warum meinst du, dass an dem Weg neben der Veloroute Radfahren verboten ist? Mir sieht das eher nach Access=private aus.
Omegatherion (2021-08-29 12:55:55+00:00): Warum meinst du, dass die Straße für Fahrradfahrer und Fußgänger verboten ist?
AyrtonM (2021-09-03 16:52:03+00:00): Weil es eine Hauptstraße für Autos ist. Fußgänger bzw. Fahrräder müssen den Bürgersteig benutzen.
Omegatherion (2021-09-04 10:11:26+00:00): Eine Hauptstraße schließt erstmal kein Fuß- oder Radverkehr aus. Dies kann nur durch zusätzliche Beschilderung erfolgen.
Das Radwegnutzungsgebot ist kein Nutzungsverbot der Fahrbahn und wird durch bicycle=use_sidepath abgebildet:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath
plennert (2021-09-20 16:12:13+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
wieso hast du builing=yes gesetzt? Das Gebäude ist doch noch nicht fertig.
Gruss
Ralph
mavl (2021-08-26 16:20:39+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 108617928, 108618004, 108625839, 108625873, 108625978, 108626012, 108671131, 108718392, 108790175, 109091490, 109874692, 110087228, 110087246, 110087270, 110087367, 110098544, 110149015, 110214612, 110214958, 110215593, 110215940, 110217329, 110217375, 110217637, 110217718, 110217756, 110218075, 110218740, 110278821, 110284940, 110284986, 110285113, 110285205, 110285265, 110285534, 110286399, 110286441, 110286593, 110286748, 110286872, 110287032.
Osmosefixer2021 (2021-08-26 16:36:26+00:00): Added addresses to post offices in Arkansas.
Kovoschiz (2021-08-27 04:53:44+00:00): Removing `highway=residential` causes damage to map data.
eggie (2021-08-26 20:07:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Lijkt me oke.. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Kovoschiz (2021-08-27 04:56:05+00:00): 1. Please don't distort the building shape. 
2. `Details=` is not used. If you don't know what to use, you can dump it in `description=` first.
Kovoschiz (2021-08-27 04:56:46+00:00): + 2. Neither is `Place Names=`
eggie (2021-08-26 20:11:00+00:00): Mark.. Feedback.. Lijkt me oke.
MVG
eggie
gscholz (2021-09-04 06:21:26+00:00): Hi Gabriel,
your recent changeset have added several errors to the OSM database regarding oberlapping ways and not connected ways:



http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-53.32576&lat=-23.50070&zoom=13&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Guido
bxl-forever (2021-08-26 23:01:55+00:00): Sorry, I had to revert your change.

Organic Maps is a nice and user-friendly app but it has a problem: the map you see in the app is not refreshed in real time and lags behind.
Lloyd Coffee Eatery was already on the map before your change.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1242137440
mueschel (2021-09-04 09:50:03+00:00): Hi,
what does "centre_no" mean? This tag isn't used in any other place.
bkw777geo (2021-08-26 18:35:34+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)
PT-53 (2021-08-27 06:25:51+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,
Du gibst als CS-Kommentar "kleine Änderungen/Verbesserungen" an.

Du hast im Baugebiet Hauderboschen die Fläche
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453089583/history
ersatzlos gelöscht. Warum ?

Diese Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/976736028/history
hast Du neu eingezeichnet und mit der falschen Merkmal-Kombination
highway=residential  +
construction=highway
versehen.
Auch fehlt die Quellen-Angabe für diese Straße.

Wann wurde diese Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174144187/history
neu gebaut ?

Bei diesen beiden Straßenabschnitten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108059175/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245755771/history
hast Du jeweils das Merkmal
start_date=2013
gelöscht. Warum ? War das falsch ?

Das sind
a) keine Kleinigkeiten und
b) keine Verbesserungen.
Ich habe Deine Änderungen daher vollständig zurückgesetzt und bitte um eine Stellungnahme.
Grüße
techtimo (2021-08-30 10:38:17+00:00): Gracias :)
TuAmigoElEditor (2021-08-26 17:34:30+00:00): No encontré un plano oficial, pero me guie de un video del MTC:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcLL1UmFCcw
erickdeoliveiraleal (2025-05-19 10:53:15+00:00): algumas ruas criadas neste changeset nao existem ne? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/976743796#map=18/-8.485984/-36.224646
https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu/?zoom=17&lat=-8.48588&lng=-36.22397&themeId=DEFAULT-THEME&visualizationUrl=U2FsdGVkX1%2BhaU0s6d4nU%2BWVIMsM21KLzAp%2FsXdOLhoc4T95q2AlpTN6caT74yu%2Bi1QdsckID4s2HErApTMwuViZWA6oHwFxKcMURplxMhAYBuLI%2BxqJwd6o%2F5TDOkVz&datasetId=S2_L2A_CDAS&fromTime=2024-11-19T00%3A00%3A00.000Z&toTime=2025-05-19T23%3A59%3A59.999Z&layerId=1_TRUE_COLOR&demSource3D=%22MAPZEN%22&cloudCoverage=30&dateMode=MOSAIC%20
danctc (2025-05-19 14:43:58+00:00): Provavelmente devem ter desistido de fazer o loteamento no local, pois pela camada mapbox na época aparece que chegaram a fazer marcações no local
fabiotofy (2021-08-31 15:02:28+00:00): Ciao, sicuro che il nome sloveno per Fusine in Valromana sia Bela Peč ? Un saluto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110301523
gzorz (2021-08-31 15:24:07+00:00): Ciao. Si, il nome vecchio. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusine_in_Valromana
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110301523
Mundilfari (2021-08-26 20:57:23+00:00): Hello - please note that there's a difference between highway=turning_circle and highway=turning_loop. While a node tagged with highway=turning_loop can be replaced by a circular highway=* without changing the meaning, the same is not true for highway=turning_circle. If there isn't something (non-traversable) in the middle of the thing then please don't draw it as a circular way but tag the endpoint accordingly instead.

Documentation can be found here: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle
and here: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_loop

Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110302043
Futur3r (2021-08-26 18:15:27+00:00): Salut,

les adresses sont sur des nœuds, nickel.
Par contre pas besoin de les mettre sur les polygones en plus.

Seulement sur les nœuds.

Merci pour ta contribution
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110302113
os-emmer (2023-10-15 14:00:38+00:00): Hallo Nisyz,
du hast hier eine Straße mit name=* und noname=yes eingetragen. Was von beidem ist richtig? Hat der Weg einen Namen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/714361633
berndw (2023-10-21 08:43:29+00:00): @os-emmer:
noname=yes ist älter als dieses Changeset, ich nehme es raus
VA00 (2021-09-01 06:44:01+00:00): Naprawdę zaczęli już ją budować?
zuicz (2021-09-01 11:42:10+00:00): Tu pytaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110280817
VA00 (2021-09-04 05:03:24+00:00): https://jaw.pl/2021/09/estakada-w-byczynie-prace-rozpoczete/
felipeeugenio (2021-08-27 13:31:26+00:00): ALonso, hemos discutido esto antes, por favor no pegar cosas a los caminos. estás diciendo que el parque y el bosque llegan a la mitad de la calle. Voy a tener que corregirlo.
Además el parque Lantaño, no obstante el nombre, no calza con la descripción de la wiki para el tag park. Quizas reserva natural sea mejor.

saludos y por favor consulta si tienes dudas, no hagas ediciones sin averiguar. saludos
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110302894
Vatyx (2021-09-13 09:16:02+00:00): J'ai ajouté le tag area=no sur les circuits fermés du pumptrack, pour qu'ils s'extraient comme des lines et nom des surfaces.
CartoCharles (2021-09-13 09:26:28+00:00): Bien vu, merci :)
Charles
Frans S (2021-08-28 08:30:56+00:00): Hello. 
A remark on this mapping
This are 3 building. 
Please map  them as single buildings
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110303624
seattlefyi (2021-08-27 22:48:34+00:00): Looks great, thanks for the edit!
DUGA (2022-09-24 19:49:48+00:00): Your edit in this area has offset issue.

Please avoid using ESRI Clarity as it is dated.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/976762032#map=18/41.85561/-75.74530
ottwiz (2021-08-27 15:47:23+00:00): Hey! if you noticed i tried to align all the roads in the Oak Hill - Fayetteville - Beckley area. i'm still doing this project by the way. :)

https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/258/ (i just created a tasking manager for it so i can track the progress)
ottwiz (2021-08-27 15:49:11+00:00): And it's a very good that you survey the area around Beckley. I give you kudos for this
abakus_uploader (2021-08-26 22:33:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ravipalev (2022-01-12 10:18:40+00:00): Classification incorrect at this place (21.4607417, 81.6870019)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110304987
ottwiz (2021-08-26 21:55:14+00:00): XD jó nagyra sikeredett a changeset mert Elekbe is beleszerkesztettél
ottwiz (2021-08-26 21:57:24+00:00): és a geotagged képek tőlem származnak, csak még nem lettek feldolgozva, jitsin  keresztül koordinálva oldottuk meg ezt /más térképészek számára írom/
user_11435438 (2021-10-07 08:46:27+00:00): 好傢伙老共諜了
user_3022894 (2021-09-01 15:55:14+00:00): Hallo wuppertal-freund,

nur eine kleine Sache, ich glaube, bei der Wohngebiet-Area Lüntenbeck ist hier im Tagging etwas schief gegangen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27850306/history

Das sieht mir aus, als wären dort von dir (wohl aus Versehen?) Tags für einen Weg angebracht worden...

Wenn du das korrigieren könntest, wär's das echt super.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
wuppertal-freund (2021-09-01 20:58:55+00:00): Hallo Lukas,
danke für den Hinweis. Irgendwie kam mir das Gebiet auch schon komisch vor, aber dass das an meiner versehentlichen Bearbeitung lag, hatte ich nicht bemerkt.
Viele Grüße,
Olaf
user_3022894 (2021-09-03 16:47:38+00:00): Hallo Olaf,
alles klar, vielen Dank für die Korrektur!

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Lee Carré (2021-09-03 19:43:52+00:00): Re node #9038918986 (the crossing (outside the school) which is also a traffic (‘calming’) table): see changeset #110667321 .

In future, you want to set traffic_calming=table for such things (or possibly traffic_calming=hump, depending on its shape).

See http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming .
Lee Carré (2021-09-03 19:46:52+00:00): You might also consider kerb=flush if that's also the case for a given table.
jonrellim (2021-08-26 21:40:25+00:00): Hoi! Volgens mij is hier nog wel een éenrichting, maar enkel van toepassing op gemotoriseerde voertuigen (die vermoedelijk toch bijna niet navigeren over deze "wegen"), maar het zit er dus wel. Het is namelijk wel nuttige informatie voor vergunninghouders die er wel mogen rijden. Ik ben er deze week nog geweest, tenzij het daarna veranderd is?
Wetterhorn (2021-08-27 07:53:19+00:00): Oeps, je hebt helemaal gelijk, ik verbeter het direct! (gekke is trouwens dat vanaf de Markstraat er geen uitzonder is voor fietsters...)
jonrellim (2021-08-27 16:36:42+00:00): Nee die bordjes worden nog wel eens weg gejat, haha.
mapper377 (2021-08-26 23:08:01+00:00): In the changeset comment the correct abbreviation for "Ohio" is OH, not HO.
DUGA (2021-10-23 20:57:25+00:00): That's not an utility pole.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9038964734#map=19/41.09534/-75.03119
julcnx (2021-08-27 03:06:13+00:00): Marco, I already sent you a message. Please use Maxar instead of Bing. Some buildings you have added do not exist anymore. Please review your past edits, it is the responsibility of the mapper to respond to changeset discussions and correct them when necessary. If I do not hear further from you, I may have to flag you and revert your changesets.

มาร์โค ฉันส่งข้อความถึงคุณแล้ว โปรดใช้ Maxar แทน Bing อาคารบางหลังที่คุณเพิ่มไม่มีอยู่อีกต่อไป โปรดตรวจสอบการแก้ไขที่ผ่านมาของคุณ เป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้ทำแผนที่ในการตอบกลับการอภิปรายเกี่ยวกับชุดการแก้ไขและแก้ไขเมื่อจำเป็น หากฉันไม่ได้ยินจากคุณเพิ่มเติม เราอาจต้องตั้งค่าสถานะคุณและเปลี่ยนชุดการเปลี่ยนแปลงของคุณ
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110307524
mueschel (2021-09-04 08:35:12+00:00): Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of keys. It's "name:sr-Latn", not "name:sr-lat". I just corrected a couple of them.
ravipalev (2022-01-12 09:38:08+00:00): It seems like this is extra road added here by you (21.8541874, 81.9262853)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110307631
Heinz_V (2022-01-12 15:53:08+00:00): I made corrections; thanks for the comment
DaveF (2021-08-29 15:35:54+00:00): Hi
What sport is played on this size/shape?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975381086#map=18/51.46524/0.02215
RedAuburn (2021-08-29 19:12:14+00:00): It's a general sport pitch, it's used for running, javelin, football, cricket etc. Generally PE sports, nothing specific though.
DaveF (2021-08-29 21:27:14+00:00): leisure=pitch is for specific sports areas ie within white lines, which is why I created the cricket oval Other pitches can be added & overlapped, if necessary. 
Note, your edit left behind loads of empty nodes.
RedAuburn (2021-08-29 21:47:48+00:00): Ah, I didn't know that! I've removed the empty nodes and the pitch :)
many thanks.
BCNorwich (2021-08-27 07:05:19+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just to let you know there's no need for data to be duplicated on a building and a POI. I've made minor amendments.

Regards Bernard.