piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-23 18:12:48+00:00): Use the ref tag instead of name for hole numbers
praeteritum (2023-04-01 21:17:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134395526.
wkdgs (2022-03-24 09:18:39+00:00): Hi,

statt "destroyed=yes" ist ein veralteter Tag. Besser ist es einen der Lebenszyklus-Präfixe zu verwenden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Also einfach vor jeden Tag, der nicht mehr zutrifft den "destroyed"-Präfix schreiben.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118755023
GrafvonTrips (2022-03-24 22:49:25+00:00): Hi, 
danke dir für die Info, habs angepasst.

Gruß
praeteritum (2023-04-01 21:13:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134395448.
EneaSuper (2022-03-22 09:42:31+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che i punti cardinali che hai adoperato come denominazioni delle gallerie a volte sono maiuscoli e a volte no.

Temo sia un tuo refuso, ergo ho preferito segnalartelo 🙂
Andrew Cabassa (2022-03-25 07:39:17+00:00): Grazie si ho corretto
praeteritum (2023-04-01 21:06:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 134395283.
user_2066394 (2022-03-21 23:44:03+00:00): Da ist website:menu=* aber durchgerutsch?
user_2066394 (2022-03-21 23:44:41+00:00): +t
wielandb (2022-03-22 18:48:49+00:00): Tatsache... :/ Habe es nachgetragen...
vojtechzaboril (2022-03-30 15:30:28+00:00): Dobrý den,
nejsem si jist, jestli je značení podzemního bunkru jako budovy správné (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13875652).
Díky
Lukáš Jelínek (2022-03-30 18:27:29+00:00): Dobrý den, podle dokumentace je právě bunkr jedním z typů budovy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dbunker). A budova může být i podzemní.
vojtechzaboril (2022-03-30 18:34:32+00:00): Měl jsem za to, že jako budova se označují pouze alespoň částečně nadzemní stavby. Třeba ta přístupová chodba/tunel budovou určitě není, ale částí bunkru je. Myslím že by to takto být označeno nemělo.
Lukáš Jelínek (2022-03-30 18:59:37+00:00): O té nadzemnosti v dokumentaci nic není - naopak je tam jako budova zmíněn cellar, tedy sklep. Pokud bych věděl o lepším označení bunkru, už bych ho býval použil (ještě připadá v úvahu použít jen pouhé "military=bunker" bez budovy - o ničem dalším už nevím). Na budově rozhodně nelpím. S tím tunelem je to asi pravda - měl by být označen jinak.
vojtechzaboril (2022-03-30 19:17:36+00:00): Právě kdyby to byl jen samostatný bunker a ne i tunel, tak by asi budova nevadila. Tady bych to vyřešil odstraněním tagu budovy. Alternativní a složitější řešení by bylo to rozdělit tak, aby tunel nebyl značen jako budova, ale ostatní části ano.
Karthoo (2022-03-22 17:13:17+00:00): Hi,
kann es sein, dass du mit diesem Changeset gar nichts geändert hast?
Gruß
wielandb (2022-03-22 18:41:44+00:00): Ja, das kann allerdings sein. :( Da ist irgendwas schiefgelaufen. 
Habe es nachgetragen.
user_5359 (2022-03-23 17:53:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9596015309. What is the meaning of the tags
ADD_LOC = B
STR_NAME = Big Lake
STR_TYPE = Drive
Dmytro O (2022-04-01 17:15:54+00:00): The location of the node 9330848530 is not accurate. Fixed
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-20 09:00:45+00:00): W tej edycji użyty został tag dispensing=no - na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2360485573

Pamiętasz może co miało być przekazane przez to tagowanie?
Tomas Straupis (2022-03-22 06:00:15+00:00): Atšaukiau vandens žymų sugadinimus. landuse=basin ir landuse=reservoir yra teisingas žymėjimas. iD yra prastas redaktorius, kuris daro nesąmoningus siūlymus keisti gerai pažymėtus objektus. Nereikia klausyti JOKIŲ iD redaktoriaus siūlymų keisti „pasenusias“ žymas.
Jaunius Sinkevicius (2022-03-22 11:01:19+00:00): Ačiū, supratau
gscholz (2022-03-23 05:44:05+00:00): Hi LuceHerrera,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-57.42709&lat=-25.24186&zoom=15

Can you please fix this?

Your changesets also does not have an explaining comment about what you are doing. Can you please read this article to inform yourself?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-03-26 08:42:23+00:00): Hi LuceHerrera,
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
aaronq227 (2022-03-22 18:52:39+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery.
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2022-03-22 09:21:53+00:00): Hello, your changeset show 3 parking in Australia and one in Cyprus.
consider to update more frequently; your changeset spans over 3 Continents: I was monitoring the activity in Somalia and I came across with yours.
Cheers
  Alessandro
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-03-22 11:21:43+00:00): I will need to revert this changeset. This is the way we map the motorways here, with precise lane merging according to exact lane centerlines, for autonomous vehicles and modelling and analysis requirements. You can propose a new changeset for the exit names though if you want. Thanks for your understanding!
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-03-22 13:03:34+00:00): No problem, but the exit name's aren't real ones either; they're merely destination info on signage being forced to appear on main map.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-03-22 13:20:02+00:00): I don't know what is the correct naming for exits in Canada. You can ask the community. I am mostly responsible for standardizing road alignements and road tags in Quebec. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-03-22 13:21:42+00:00): But, yes, there is no real exit names in Quebec, only exit numbers. Only the destinations and nearby towns appear on the signs.
aixbrick (2022-03-22 10:33:23+00:00): Hallo,
was wurde denn hier und in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118755764 geändert? Ich sehe da keine Unterschiede zwischen deiner und der vorherigen Version.
Gruß
wielandb (2022-03-22 18:45:46+00:00): Es wurde nichts geändert, mir ist da ein Fehler unterlaufen. Habe es nachgetragen.
aixbrick (2022-03-23 07:19:41+00:00): Danke :-)
map per (2022-03-24 17:06:03+00:00): Hallo Wuermtalkartograf,

ich finde, dass es keine gute Idee ist Weideflächen mit Wegen (oder auch Bächen) zu verbinden (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042471400), weil die Weide am Rand des Weges zu Ende ist und nicht in der Mitte der Straße.

Außerdem sollten Wald und Wiesenflächen nicht überlappen (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253648301).

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
map per (2023-01-18 20:59:12+00:00): Die Probleme gelöst und die Wiesen, die extrem schlecht eingezeichnet waren (überlappend mit Wäldern, extrem ungenau und mit Straßen verbunden), wieder gelöscht. Neu einzeichnen ist einfacher als das aufzuräumen.
Alex_457 (2022-04-05 14:38:07+00:00): Not sure why you added this since I already added the traffic light further back at the stop line
Alec Coates (2022-04-11 00:20:23+00:00): This was to add the secondary (middle) stop light of the set - which stops cyclists from passing through the right orifice (where there may be oncoming vehicles), making them pass though the cycle lane instead.
user_5359 (2022-03-23 19:06:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9596321877. What is the meaning of the tag Rua = Santolina
adrianojbr (2022-03-25 12:23:14+00:00): It was a mistake. I fixed to crossing.
Frans S (2022-04-03 10:39:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
You map round buildings often rather oversized. Please zoom in far enough to map more accurate. It cost a lot of time to correct them (1 by 1)



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118758655
kevinp2 (2022-04-13 03:36:47+00:00): Hi, this changeset says "Added Port A schools" but it is a large edit to several streets including removing tags from some of them.  

For example, you removed the tag of cycleway=none from Beach Street (way 833760990).

Are you possibly using software that is removing tags and deleting information without your knowledge?
kevinp2 (2022-04-13 03:39:47+00:00): This changeset also deleted a marked pedestrian crossing that exists.  Way 1026246841.
kevinp2 (2022-04-13 04:07:46+00:00): Also wrongly deleted: a parking aisle, way 1015280411
kevinp2 (2022-04-13 04:09:43+00:00): Also wrongly deleted without any discussion: relation 13593435, which joins together the various parts of St. Joseph's Catholic Church compound.  This took an hour of on-foot survey to create!
kevinp2 (2022-04-13 04:20:23+00:00): Wrongly removed the tag cycleway=none from Trout Street
kevinp2 (2022-04-13 04:33:04+00:00): Wrongly removed the tag cycleway=none from Cotter Avenue.  These have been explicitly surveyed to make it easier to plan bike routes.  Please don't delete anything that you don't understand or haven't verified.
kevinp2 (2022-04-13 04:38:30+00:00): The tag cycleway=none has been wrongly removed in this commit from several city streets  that have nothing to do with "Port A" schools.  The purpose of adding this tag was to clearly identify which roads did NOT have a bike path, and which roads might or might not.  You have eliminated all this work.
TravGW (2022-04-13 15:16:20+00:00): The tag deletions probably should have been in their own changeset.

Cycleway=no is usually the default and normally doesn't need to be added. I'll ask the OSM US Slack group about when to use cycleway=no.

The pedestrian crossing was not attached to any other ways making it a routing island. As such it was deleted. I'll add it back in along with the sidewalks.

The Catholic church relation was done incorrectly. They way in which it was done, made it seem as though everything but the buildings were part of the church grounds. The relation is not needed was deleted. The tags from the relation were moved onto way 1015277541.
kevinp2 (2022-04-13 16:26:35+00:00): Thanks, I appreciate your response.

In general, I would request you to not delete other users' contributions without verifying that the feature in question does not actually exist.  Even if they are incomplete, they still represent reality and can be completed by the original user, or others who come along later.  I have myself expanded and extended other users' basic creations. 

Thanks!
archpdx (2022-03-22 07:55:41+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! This change looks good to me.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-25 04:04:35+00:00): Why are you adding random roads?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118758984
BladeofDarken (2022-03-25 19:57:19+00:00): Hello! We are students from the school working on a project for the school. Please revert the changes, we spent multiple hours mapping the paths inside the school onto the map.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-25 20:47:27+00:00): Unfortunately all the deleted items were tagged as roads and are not valid data. I suggest students read through these wiki pages before continuing. Thanks
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping
BladeofDarken (2022-03-25 21:10:21+00:00): Can you revert the change, and then we can change the roads to paths?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-25 23:12:41+00:00): Several issues with that proposal:
A lot of the roads aren't even paths (cutting across pitch etc.). 
Other users have started adding the correct paths.
Incorrect data shouldn't be added for any length of time.
If this was an acceptable solution I would've done it myself instead of deleting.
BladeofDarken (2022-03-26 01:52:11+00:00): I go to the school, and I can confirm that there is a footpath across the pitch, along with any other footpaths that we added. Could you please revert it? Because of the changes, our app on the google play store, with many users, completely crashed because there are no more paths for the app to use. Thanks
BladeofDarken (2022-03-26 01:52:55+00:00): We are willing to change the roads to footpaths if you revert it to how it was before
ZeLonewolf (2022-03-26 03:05:30+00:00): In OpenStreetMap we add correct data, and we do not map for specific apps or data consumers.  If an app you are developing is crashing, that's a problem with your app, not with OpenStreetMap.
BladeofDarken (2022-03-26 03:38:11+00:00): I understand, we are willing to switch the roads to footpaths, which is what actually exists within the school. Is that a possibility?
ZeLonewolf (2022-03-26 03:41:28+00:00): Either footway or pedestrian areas would be a good fit here.
BladeofDarken (2022-03-26 03:44:00+00:00): Sounds good, thanks a lot! Once all the paths are back, we will make the necessary changes!
compdude (2022-07-17 06:17:18+00:00): Why did you change parts of WA 112 to primary while leaving other parts (including several bridges) as secondary? Was this intentional or a mistake?
AlphaPy (2022-07-17 16:06:01+00:00): *facepalm* I'm still new to the nuts and bolts of the editing system. I'm sorry. Feel free to fix, or I'll take a closer look and see if I can remedy this week.
compdude (2022-07-18 04:01:50+00:00): No problem, thanks for the reply. I'll go ahead and fix this.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-03-22 20:29:09+00:00): Hi Casey,
Are you sure you've got this in the right place? Looks like a fairly new residential building and I can't find any reference to a Hut Road park in this area.
CmdrThor (2022-03-23 09:57:58+00:00): Hey there,  
Houses typically do not have names and their address definitely should not go in the name tag. The addr:* tags are all that is needed. See the houses on the other side of Saint Peters Howell for reference.

Thanks.
rab (2022-03-22 21:34:08+00:00): No buildings, no supermarked, but parking cars. Where is your local knowledge? Your mapping looks more like vandalism to me!
Letwin (2022-03-23 09:16:18+00:00): Hi, please exercise patience I'm just a learner and besides mistakes are common. Air your views politely so that you don't discourage us beginners. Thank you.
rab (2022-03-23 18:14:38+00:00): Hi Letwin,
thanks for your reply. Lets try it in a different way. First thing you have to do as a remote mapper is to determine the most recent imagery. In ID click on the background settings and look for new buildings, finished construction work or similar in the available layers. 
At the moment maxar seems to be the best choice.
Compare the existing mapping with the background. If necessary adjust the imagery offset. Happy mapping! Do as little guessing as possible. Check the wiki if you are unsure about the correct tagging. Before uploading, try to fix reported problems.
Apply your local knowledge (Names, social facilities, hospitals businesses ...).


What has to be fixed with your recent uploads?

1. as commented, non exiting buildings

2. buildings not rectangular

3. wrong tagged roads drawn over existing ones

4. natural wood on a node

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=14.12549&lat=49.88331&zoom=6

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=14&lat=-18.22968&lon=28.94442
(not updated yet)

please let me know if you need some help
vichada (2022-03-23 19:56:39+00:00): Sorry wrong changset comment. Should be:
#hotosm-project-10160 #liga-zambia
Minh Nguyen (2022-03-30 06:28:32+00:00): It looks like iD uploaded this empty changeset as you were experiencing something similar to https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/7199 .

I took the .osc file you recovered from iD and reuploaded it as changeset 119098882 using JOSM. Please review my changes. The .osc file appeared to be partial or corrupted; I had to fill in some ways that were missing. Maybe it was just that you had to recover the data from a POST request body in your browser’s network inspector instead of the usual osmChange download link.

I’m also unsure if I resolved the conflict in relation 1476971 correctly.
Minh Nguyen (2022-03-30 06:31:50+00:00): Specifically, ways 1046405516 and 1046405515 were missing from the .osc file. Way 1033401133 was also missing, so the nodes you added to the south of the railroad crossing would’ve gotten orphaned.
Minh Nguyen (2022-03-30 06:34:41+00:00): I also had to fix a lot of other orphaned nodes where you had clearly wanted to add a node somewhere along a way, but the .osc file omitted the way.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:52:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Honey Fombuena (2022-03-22 07:34:38+00:00): Hello! Please minimize osm deletion, add or modify the tags to the existing objects instead of deleting. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118760610
ivanbranco (2022-03-22 16:41:27+00:00): Hi kaliphe,

I think you added the name as place value here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042519909/history

could you check it out please?
ivanbranco (2022-04-12 18:52:24+00:00): Since I got no reply I'm going to change it with a landuse residential, feel free to edit it again with a proper place=* value if you want, good mapping :)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-25 03:53:13+00:00): The highway tag shouldn't be removed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118761065
canfe (2022-04-01 13:50:20+00:00): ma la linea che congiunge
9596514150, v1
9596514149, v1
a cosa serve?
mircozorzo (2022-04-17 07:18:07+00:00): Ciao, grazie della segnalazione. Non serve a niente, è un refuso, mi serviva per capire la distanza ma non avrei dovuto caricarla. Ho sistemato.
Honey Fombuena (2022-03-22 07:20:10+00:00): Hi! Please remove the name tag for private households. Thank you :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118761859
5m4u9 (2022-03-24 00:19:45+00:00): Hola JJ, esos cambios de sentido de la portales y otras son nuevas disposiciones después de inaugurar? me base en lo que vi que pase por ahí y en lo que vi en las publicaciones. Habían giros en U medio peligrosos o zig zags con alta velocidad en la portales, ciclovia y melchor urquidi

En general me parece bien que esté intercalado los sentidos y no todo doble vía como estaba antes. Obvio que cuesta acostumbrarse a nuevos cambios. También me parece bien que todo el tráfico se vaya a las avenidas y no a las callecitas, de cierta forma se pacifica las calles residenciales.
Honey Fombuena (2022-03-22 07:19:59+00:00): Hi! Please remove the name tag for private households. Thank you :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118762007
Honey Fombuena (2022-03-22 07:18:27+00:00): Hello! Please be reminded that the name info on private household buildings is not advisable. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118762296
Dimitar155 (2022-03-22 13:54:18+00:00): Промяната е върната в 118779972. Сградата и пътя са видими на сателитни изображения от февруари 2022-ра.
mavl (2022-03-24 10:22:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118856314 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118733296].
Dimitar155 (2022-03-22 13:07:44+00:00): Защо пак си изтрил пътеките?
Dimitar155 (2022-03-22 22:14:26+00:00): Промяната е върната в 118796390
mavl (2022-03-22 06:23:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 118720940, 118721604, 118722646, 118723176, 118723278, 118723668, 118723717, 118723857, 118724141, 118724273, 118724391, 118724649, 118724781.
user4816003805 (2022-03-22 06:38:30+00:00): The Walgreens on Mission Street
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/418513656/history) had an address attached to it.
Is there just a vacant shop there?
Rather than deleting the entire node and losing the address information, you might consider using a disused:shop (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:shop) tag so it can show up as a "Is this shop still vacant?" quest on StreetComplete.
mavl (2022-03-24 10:22:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118856314 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118733296].
Dimitar155 (2022-03-22 13:09:07+00:00): Защо пак си изтрил този път?
Dimitar155 (2022-03-22 22:13:50+00:00): Промяната е върната в 118796363
eggie (2022-03-22 07:17:29+00:00): Dag Sven.. Dat zal vast kloppen, maar.... 

https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.139928308&lng=4.728659391&z=19

Zou de maxweight=3.5  een 'foutje' zijn? Dat bord staat niet in het databestand (zie link boven) 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118763458

MVG
eggie
Sven Pothuizen (2022-03-22 07:21:28+00:00): Tsja, Die zag ik ook al qua gewicht maar die durfde ik niet weg te halen ;-) kon niet uitsluiten dat er wel of geen beperking op zit. Al mag ie er wat mij betreft af wij moeten in de navigatie anders een uitzondering maken. Post Aarlanderveen kan er wel "gewoon" overheen met het voertuig.
eggie (2022-03-22 07:29:21+00:00): 'k Heb het even neergelegd bij de voorgaande mapper.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90682030#map=19/52.14003/4.72803

Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-22 18:21:10+00:00): maxweight verwijderd
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90682030#map=19/52.14003/4.72803
Honey Fombuena (2022-03-22 07:06:09+00:00): Hello! Please confirm, are the buildings shown on the imagery not existing on the ground? Thank you, looking forward for your reply.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118763744
mini-me (2022-03-22 14:21:41+00:00): Это не официальный маршрут. Тем более, он не может проходить по тротуарам.
MosKartograf (2022-04-18 09:06:59+00:00): Как тогда отмечаем, коллега?
mini-me (2022-04-18 09:57:53+00:00): Да никак не отмечаем. Для этого больше подходят сервисы типа alltrails.com
MosKartograf (2022-04-20 03:42:13+00:00): Понятно.
mavl (2022-03-24 10:22:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118856314 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118733296].
mcliquid (2022-04-01 12:00:56+00:00): Hi Steirerpollux, du hast (vermutlich unabsichtlich) die Floridsdorfer Hauptstraße an einer Stelle um etwa 20 Meter nach Osten verschoben.
Es betrifft diesen Punkt hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7158691408

Könntest du dir das nochmal anschauen? Vielen Dank!
Steirerpollux (2022-04-02 05:18:45+00:00): Hallo,

Ich habe versucht den punkt zurueckzuschieben, aber es verschiebt sich anscheinend die gruenflaeche mit. Klar war es unabsichtlich. Ich wollte micht mehr als die nachricht ueber den hausabriss hinterlassen.

LG
mcliquid (2022-04-02 06:09:38+00:00): Hi, danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich hab dir die Grünfläche von der Straße abgetrennt und angepasst. Schau gerne nochmal drauf, wenn du noch etwas daran optimieren möchtest. Viele Grüße
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119224311)
skquinn (2022-03-22 08:57:23+00:00): Hi,

While we welcome businesses adding themselves to OpenStreetMap, please note that we do not welcome advertising copy, particularly in the description=* tag (this is specifically noted in the wiki <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description>)and changeset comments (which are noindex and nofollow and thus will not be indexed by search engines, so there is no point).