piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-10-12 16:04:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
mavl (2017-10-12 16:03:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
Akkedisi (2017-03-08 18:06:41+00:00): (1)The ways you changed are not footways they are highway:paths as described by the OSM wiki. 

The wiki states the following:
a) "For multi-use or unspecified paths and trails used by a variety of non-motorised traffic the tag highway=path may be better suited."
b) "For urban paths which a designated for pedestrians only, use highway=footway."

The paths for which you have changed the pathway tag are not urban paths but wilderness trails. 

Wiki page for Footway:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway

Wiki page for Path:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath



(2) Table Mountain National Park is a Nature Reserve not a Municipal Park. 

Nature Reserve:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park?uselang=en#National_Parks

Municipal Park:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park?uselang=en
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 23:06:21+00:00): This looks like a undiscussed mechanical edit.
What's the source?
manoharuss (2017-02-07 09:34:53+00:00): Hi JeaRRo,

ruins=yes is the right tag not ruin=yes. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264581664

Can you please correct

Best,
Manohar
manoharuss (2017-02-07 09:36:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/264581664
manoharuss (2017-02-07 09:38:48+00:00): Name cannot be description: Castle (old)
JeaRRo (2017-02-07 11:23:07+00:00): ok c'est corrigé
cordialement
jean
manoharuss (2017-02-07 11:32:38+00:00): Thank you :)
mavl (2017-10-12 16:03:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
mueschel (2017-02-06 11:35:47+00:00): Please stop adding ingress and pokemon features. OSM does not contain such ficitional objects.
Fortepc (2017-02-07 22:52:17+00:00): @Mueschel you're suggesting OSM doesn't contain Freedom Park? you're sorely mistaken. Sorry for the confusion but my changeset updated the accuracy of the park on the ground, as well as added relevant information in the tags. 

Thanks for your concern, but try again next time with that high horse crap.
mueschel (2017-02-08 11:42:34+00:00): Is Freedom Park fictional? Can I see it when walking there? So yes, it should be in OSM. Can I see Pokemons when I walk there? No, they are just existing in a software on your mobile phone.

Thanks for not insulting other mappers.
Fortepc (2017-02-08 17:27:04+00:00): I was not mapping "Pokemons" I was tagging the park as also being represented in the Augmented Space, the same as you'd tag the park's website or social pages, or any of the many tags on this part that are a non-physical fact about the park.
Fortepc (2017-02-08 17:30:03+00:00): Look at my edit history, I'm not some token kid trying to vandalize the map. I care about accuracy. I'm seeking to use my local knowledge to map with the greatest accuracy possible. With as much information about the POIs as possible.
Nakaner (2017-02-08 18:29:34+00:00): Hi Fortepc,

adding arg:ingress=portalfarm, arg:pokemongo=pokestopfarm and arg:pokemongo_1=nest does not meet our guidelines about verifiability (also known as the "On The Ground Rule"). Please only add information to OpenStreetMap which everyone can VERIFY ON THE GROUND.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tips-pokemon-go/

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner (2017-02-08 18:30:46+00:00): PS Freedom Park has a very strange tagging with dozens of uppercase keys which also is against our rules but that does not make your edits better. The edit which added those uppercase keys might be treated the same way as you.
Fortepc (2017-02-09 17:19:12+00:00): @Nakaner, Yes. I am very familiar with the OSM's on the ground rule. But rule is for mapping things, not adding information to the tags of things. And I am also following all of the rules present on the Pokemon Go blogpost you referred to. I'm improving accuracy of what is on the ground, as well as adding as much information about those POIs as I know. "On the ground rule" doesn't apply to tags because You can't verify on the ground what a POI's website is, or who the operator of a business is, or what the pickup times are for a public trashcan, etc. 

The things I've mapped are 100% accurate. The Information I've added to those things are relevant to the POI, and definitely keep with the spirit of OSM. Accurate and complete information about the mapped objects.
mavl (2017-10-12 16:04:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
pnorman (2017-10-02 17:59:06+00:00): Hello,
I'm wondering why you split https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472477000 into its own way. I can't see any reason to do so, and any relations on it didn't need it split.
petrar_telenav (2017-10-03 06:12:18+00:00): Hi,
That way was too long for adding that restriction, but you are right, maybe I should have split the way at the first intersection.
I will make this changes now. Thanks for your observation and if there is anything else please feel free to contact me.
pnorman (2017-10-03 06:39:33+00:00): Ways can't be too long for adding a restriction.
petrar_telenav (2017-10-03 06:44:43+00:00): I mean, if they are too long, someone who is editing other things like turn lane for eg, can split the way and break the relation I made
pnorman (2017-10-03 06:53:21+00:00): All editors handle way splits correctly, and if any didn't, it would be an editor bug. I've rejoined the ways at 49th and Granville, could you handle any others?

I also saw that when you split stuff one way ended up in relations twice
petrar_telenav (2017-10-03 07:16:55+00:00): When I split a way I checked to see if it's part of a turn restriction relation and make sure that it's not more than 3 members.
I also found a discussion regarding splitting ways here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Relation:restriction#Splitting_Ways
As far as you can see, it's look like an open discussion.
Thanks for your observation.
Please feel free to make any changes you consider.
pnorman (2017-10-03 07:18:51+00:00): You've misinterpreted that, that is about splitting the way at the intersection which is required, not splits like this.
mavl (2017-10-12 16:04:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
mavl (2017-10-12 16:04:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
mavl (2017-10-12 16:04:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
Graf Westerholt (2017-02-24 06:49:49+00:00): Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/356205828 ist die Webseite nicht aktuell, oder? Der Comment könnte doch auch gelöscht werden, oder? Es wäre auch informativ, wenn du check_date hinzufügen würdest. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date
freebeer (2018-05-04 11:33:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58676510 where the changeset comment is: Clean maps.me private residences spam for GDPR and Notes spring-clean
mavl (2019-01-14 16:41:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-14 16:41:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Владимир К (2017-03-22 10:45:25+00:00): так как он называется? name и name:ru разные. Камешки переименовали?
grand-mix (2017-03-22 12:59:39+00:00): тут сложно сказать однозначно. Камешки камешками, но, снизу вверх идут Камешки, затем, первый городской, затем пляж лазурный, потом второй городской. Камешки идут до второго переезда (за Венерой Милосской)
Владимир К (2017-03-22 13:08:27+00:00): ну так надо разделить полигон на части и сделать все перечисленные пляжи по отдельности, делов-то:)
Владимир К (2017-03-22 13:13:56+00:00): поделил за милосской на два, дальше вам виднее где что заканчивается
Polarbear (2019-09-13 21:04:54+00:00): Du hast hier Wendeverbote eingetragen, dazu kann ich aber vor Ort keine Ausschilderung finden. 
z.B. relation 6951812
Was für eine Quelle hast du hierfür verwendet?
Yabba (2019-09-14 08:02:44+00:00): Die Änderung, auf die Du Dich beziehst, ist laut Eintrag ca. 2 Jahre her. Gemappt sicher entweder wegen durchgezogener Linien oder Flächen, Schildern oder üblicher Straßenverkehrsregeln. Quelle: Ich befahre die Strecke seit mindestens 15 Jahren sehr regelmäßig selbst und habe hier u.a. die fertiggestellten Umgehungsstraßen aufgenommen. Meine Erkenntnis über die Jahre: Brandenburgs Gemeinden schrecken nicht davor zurück häufig Änderungen umzusetzen. Deswegen kann es gut sein, daß die eine oder andere Regelung verändert wurde.
mueschel (2017-02-07 12:25:43+00:00): Hi,
please don't add junction=roundabout to circular streets without knowing the situation on ground. E.g. this one is no roundabout (as described in the german note on it)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25444119

Also, all your tags have a spelling mistake 'jonction' instead of 'junction'
Commodoortje (2017-02-07 23:06:12+00:00): This looks like a undiscussed mechanical edit.
What's the source?
roschitom (2017-03-16 20:41:55+00:00): Hallo,
warum werden Gebäude mit Informationen in den Umrissen gelöscht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208570220/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208570221/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org
/way/208570222/history und mit rudimentären losen Knoten ersetzt z.b.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4666873118
Was ist die Quelle für die Adressen
z.B https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4666873101
Kiekin (2017-03-17 07:35:55+00:00): http://regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/auswertung_auswahldetails?land=Bundesrepublik%20Deutschland&stadt=M%C3%BCgeln
Geoportal Sachsen
Commodoortje (2017-02-06 10:44:17+00:00): Hallo Koen,

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleren middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-02-06 10:49:27+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik een aantal wijzigingen/aanvullingen verricht.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45852333
Hier kunt u zien of u nog meer waardevolle data kunt toevoegen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house
Commodoortje (2017-02-06 10:50:18+00:00): Tip: 
De tag name:nl is in Nederland overbodig. 
Wil je hier rekening mee houden als je met maps.me edits aanbrengt?
mavl (2017-10-12 16:04:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
mavl (2017-10-12 16:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
mavl (2019-01-14 16:41:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mueschel (2017-02-07 11:51:15+00:00): Hi,
there are ~15 ways with a spelling mistake "shouder" instead of "shoulder". Could you have a look?

Cheers, Jan
kre3d (2017-02-07 13:02:57+00:00): Oops. Should be better now. Thanks for pointing it out!
Chetan_Gowda (2017-02-07 05:37:56+00:00): Hi CarniLvr79, Can I know the source of mapping commercial areas in chunks? If you want to map commercial area, you can map in single closed polygon. 

Best,
Chetan
andygol (2017-02-06 10:29:02+00:00): Hey, skywindsound!

You removed a lot of data in this changeset that is visible on the imagery. https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#45851267

What is the purpose of that deletion? Why didn't you improve existing data (features)?
skywindsound (2017-02-06 10:52:18+00:00): I will check road  and redraw.
thank you.
chnav (2017-02-06 19:40:51+00:00): Помощь это очень хорошо, но у нас есть правила. например мы не пишем статусные части "продуктовый магазин" или "пункт замена масло", практически все названия в вашей правке это тег description (описание), а в поле name должно стоять только имя собственное, например "Мерей-9"
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-01 00:05:04+00:00): Redraw due sharp angle.
zors1843 (2017-02-07 15:28:20+00:00): This is not a roundabout, but landuse.
andygol (2017-02-06 11:27:46+00:00): Hey, Pharos_Map!

I've spotted that you were using Custom imagery for these edits. Does this imagery meet requirements of http://osmfoundation.org/Licence ?
BharataHS_laimport (2017-02-06 12:25:07+00:00): Apologies for posting the wrong source. I was trying to add TMS layer in JOSM and accidentally have posted this as a source accidentally. The proper source that I had to use was `LA County GIS, http://egis3.lacounty.gov/dataportal/`.
GinaroZ (2017-02-06 21:12:13+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for editing the map.
Might be worth taking a look at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course for suggested ways to tag the golf course features.
For example: 
bunkers - golf=bunker and natural=sand
greens - landuse=grass, golf=green, name=
If you need any help let me know :)
Alouette955 (2017-02-23 17:14:34+00:00): The two primary_link you create here have been recently remove by me because of recent work on that intersection. They don't exist anymore. Please correct as is was before and avoid recreate it. You probably use olsolete pictures.
arming_telenav (2017-02-24 07:54:24+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I've corrected the links.
GinaroZ (2017-02-06 14:59:31+00:00): Hi, you should probably add the actual name of the bowling club instead of just the generic name.
And also add historic=memorial to the war memorial node
mrpulley (2017-04-02 14:11:05+00:00): I'm just making it clear that these edits are based on information obtained while visiting Europe in person.
mueschel (2017-02-08 11:56:26+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag recycling:Emballages =yes - tags should always be in English. An often used key is 
recycling:plastic_packaging
Does it fit?

Jan
cartolinguaphile (2017-02-14 16:05:55+00:00): This is interesting! I discovered a yearor so ago that a boggy area where we used to collect frogspawn as children (the other side of the disused railway) is known to today's local children as the Fairy Pond.
I think you should add a description giving an idea of how local the name is ("Reservoir known very locally as. . .  " or something.)
Eberth (2017-02-11 10:17:30+00:00): Ich hatte einen früheren Änderungssatz von Dir kommentiert mit der Bitte, Schul- und Universitätsgebäude nicht falsch mit building=public zu taggen. Außerdem hatte ich Dir eine Nachricht mit gleichem Inhalt geschickt.
Bitte informiere Dich auf http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building, wie man Gebäude korrekt attributiert.
Im OSM-Forum gibt es außerdem eine Diskussion über Dein Mapping-Verhalten: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57240
Bitte steige in die Diskussion ein.
Es wäre schade, wenn wir Deine sicher gut gemeinten Änderungssätze alle zurücksetzen müssten.

Thomas
BharataHS_laimport (2017-02-06 12:26:01+00:00): Apologies for posting the wrong source. I was trying to add TMS layer in JOSM and accidentally have posted this as a source accidentally. The proper source that I had to use was `LA County GIS, http://egis3.lacounty.gov/dataportal/`.
BharataHS_laimport (2017-02-06 12:38:42+00:00): Apologies for posting the wrong source. I was trying to add TMS layer in JOSM and accidentally have posted this as a source for the changeset.  The proper source that I had to use was `LA County GIS, http://egis3.lacounty.gov/dataportal/`.
Jarek 🚲 (2018-12-09 03:53:28+00:00): Hello,

what is the source for the road names for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130348904/history ?
inah_telenav (2018-12-10 06:47:40+00:00): Hello
The source I used was Geobase Roads for those names.
Jarek 🚲 (2018-12-11 02:19:52+00:00): Thanks! Can you follow-up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/958633? One of your colleagues is asking about the name of a way which you changed from highway=service to highway=residential.
Stereo_repair (2017-02-06 11:04:55+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44987328, 44989084, 44989472, 44989662, 44989933, 44990051, 44990179, 44990281, 44990366, 44990469, 44990616, 44990684, 45040465, 45040697, 45040731, 45040788, 45041095, 45633283, 45646161, 45649120, 45656403, 45700970, 45701029, 45701107, 45701138, 45701165, 45701228, 45701308, 45701357, 45701408, 45701521, 45701571, 45701790, 45701858, 45701910, 45701959, 45701984, 45702009, 45702038, 45702071, 45702086, 45702116, 45702143, 45702171, 45702200, 45702253, 45702305, 45702397, 45702431, 45703011, 45703178, 45703216, 45703237, 45703308, 45703384, 45703539, 45703586, 45703625, 45703678, 45717513, 45718130, 45718178, 45718518, 45718562, 45719310, 45719424, 45725092, 45725196, 45726116, 45726199, 45726261, 45726372, 45726433, 45726484, 45726543, 45726607, 45726670, 45726755, 45726831, 45726988, 45727112, 45727213, 45727283, 45727384, 45727444, 45727504, 45727576, 45727655, 45728478, 45728636, 45728769, 45728776, 45728883, 45729056.
Commodoortje (2017-02-06 12:00:33+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-02-06 12:03:25+00:00): De aangebrachte footway was reeds aanwezig in OSM (als pedestrian)
Je hebt (per ongeluk) een 2e weg bovenop het bestaande wandelgebied geplaatst.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45852667
Inmiddels heb ik je footway verwijderd.
.
Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve.
﻿OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
Wees wel voorzichtig, alles wat je aanraakt kan gewijzigd zijn zonder dat je ervan bewust was.
mavl (2017-02-06 16:53:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок вы удалили два озера:  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110844760/history  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110844741/history  
  
Затем на их месте вы добавили другие два озера. Пожалуйста, не удаляйте правильные объекты. Редактируйте существующие объекты. Вам нужно было только немного подправить геометрию этих озер и добавить теги (такие как наименование), но не нужно было удалять их.
BharataHS_laimport (2017-02-06 12:39:38+00:00): Apologies for posting the wrong source. I was trying to add TMS layer in JOSM and accidentally have posted this as a source for the changeset.  The proper source that I had to use was `LA County GIS, http://egis3.lacounty.gov/dataportal/`.
GinaroZ (2017-02-06 14:26:59+00:00): Hi, saw you added layer=-1 to the cycle path and railway below the A801. Just to let you know that only one of the layers should be a bridge or tunnel - not both.
I've removed the tunnel from the cycle path and railway.
mavl (2017-10-12 16:04:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
EugenyN (2017-02-06 15:39:41+00:00): что значит это изменение имени у церкви ?
mavl (2017-10-12 16:04:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
RoterEmil (2017-02-06 13:19:27+00:00): "changed position" -> where can I find the node now?
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-06 19:12:16+00:00): Hi Pharos_Map, welcome to OSM. Could you please try not to delete and insert the same data? This destroys the history, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
pesec (2017-02-06 11:42:15+00:00): В рабочие часы шлагбаум открыт.
Ранее из-за шлагбаума навигатор не прокладывал маршрут к зданиям на территории за шлагбаумом.
sbiribizio (2017-02-07 14:41:07+00:00): Hi, 
why did you delete in Casale Monferrato the small landuse=residential and create a big landuse=residential instead?
Your big landuse have inside it some landuse=playground, streets, pitch, etc.
This mapping is not accurate.
Please revert your changes or I'll do it for you.
Thanks
dieterdreist (2017-02-07 17:01:07+00:00): generally, please do not create big landuse areas with a lot of different stuff in it  (especially do not create a single landuse=residential around a village, use place areas for this). Thank you.
Fredie (2017-02-07 19:29:54+00:00): hm.
Is there a common agreement ?
Do you have a link ?
I haven't seen an area tagging for residential anywhere else, yet.
problem encountered on huge landuse ?
Can't see one up today ?
Inform me, please ?
woodpeck (2017-02-07 22:12:20+00:00): Hello Fredie, of course if you map new things then you get to decide how you map them; a large landuse area for a whole village or smaller areas - no problem. But you should not delete the work that others have done and replace it with "your style". Also, your changeset deletes a large number of other objects e.g. tracks - but big edits like this should be explained in the changeset comment. What did you do, why did you delete so much - that explanation belongs in the changeset comment and not "reg. Oltreponte C.Popolo (AL/PIE/IT)" which does not explain your actions sufficiently.
Fredie (2017-02-08 07:07:31+00:00): you are right 
I'll take consequences from this
I'll explain to sbiririzio personally
sbiribizio (2017-02-08 07:45:39+00:00): Personally you explained to me that:
"I've deleted your post without reading"
I explained in detail my complaints, why don't discuss?
I asked gently for proofs of your work.
No aswer from you.
dieterdreist (2017-02-09 11:42:09+00:00): for reference, there is also a thread on talk-it about this: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-February/057032.html