piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sanddune94 (2021-03-06 11:44:42+00:00): Dear Mapper thanks for mapping. Make sure you make building on 90 degree (where they are like that) Q key will help you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100510078
Thibault Rommel (2021-08-21 09:55:33+00:00): Beste
highway=living_street straat op woonerven aangeduidt door de borden F12a/F12b.
Deze kunnen als gevolg geen maxspeed=30 hebben.
Is het Pieter van Maldereplein hier een woonerf?
Thibault Rommel (2021-08-21 09:55:49+00:00): slaat op*
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-08-21 10:13:50+00:00): Jazeker: zie deze recente mapillary-foto: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=51.160866666667&lng=4.4232805555556&z=17&pKey=529810941348075&dateFrom=2020-08-01
Thibault Rommel (2021-08-21 11:06:05+00:00): Ideaal, dan pas ik de snelheid aan
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-08-21 11:10:48+00:00): Ah, right, die maxspeed was ik vergeten. Thx for fixing!
sanddune94 (2021-03-06 11:33:39+00:00): Dear Mapper thanks for mapping, make sure you draw building on 90 degree where they are like that, Q key can help you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100510353
sanddune94 (2021-03-06 11:21:20+00:00): Dear Mapper, thanks for mapping, make sure that you map 90 degree angle in the building (of course when it is 90 degree) Option Q on your keyboard should help
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100510499
sanddune94 (2021-03-06 11:19:04+00:00): Dear mapper, thanks for mapping. Make sure that your buildings are with 90 degree angle (of course, only where they actually are). Using key Q it will help you mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100510543
LorenzoStucchi (2021-03-07 09:48:51+00:00): Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings. Also it is important to chose the correct background image
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100510614
literan (2021-03-08 20:34:36+00:00): не надо дубли создавать
Константин Гам (2021-03-11 12:58:39+00:00): Вы к чему привязывали снимки? 
Нарушена геометрия дорог, пожалуйста исправьте
Ser9ei (2021-03-11 13:58:55+00:00): исправлено
sanddune94 (2021-03-06 10:49:22+00:00): Shape of the buildings should be improved
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100510891
sanddune94 (2021-03-06 10:50:30+00:00): Dear Mapper, try not to intersect roads and buildings, or building with building, the nodes should be divided, it will help if you zoom in while mapping, thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100510891
LorenzoStucchi (2021-03-07 09:58:54+00:00): Hi, thanks for your mapping. It is correct but reminds to square the buildings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100511153
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-06-28 00:25:43+00:00): Olá Marina Perin,
neste objeto natural = água (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/913956863) Encontrei problema de cruzamento.

você se importaria de consertá-lo? deixe-me saber se houver dados de atualização.

obrigada
===============================

Hello Marina Perin,
on this natural=water object (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/913956863) I found a crossing issue.

would you mind to fix it? let me know if any an update data.

Thank you
Enock4seth (2022-10-04 21:55:08+00:00): hi,
can you clarify the usefulness of these spaghetti roads you mapped here?
sanddune94 (2021-03-06 10:48:21+00:00): Dear mapper, thanks for mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100511474
Ze0zohk1 (2021-03-09 18:27:20+00:00): Hallo Jokus13,

ich hab gerade deine Änderung gesehen. Meinst du es ist sinnvoll hier shelter_type und shelter zu vergeben? Auf mich wirkt es so, als würde eine leisure=wildlife_hide zwar (ggf.) Schutz vor Wind und Wetter bieten, aber ein Feature mit amenity=shelter habe ich ja eine andere Erwartung... Deshalb: Wäre shelter=yes vielleicht eine bessere Alternative? Was denkst du?

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
Jokus13 (2021-03-09 19:29:25+00:00): Hey Ze0zohk1,
danke für die gute Rückfrage. Ich habe mir den Artikel zum leisure=wildlife_hide noch einmal genauer angeguckt und würde dir wohl recht geben. In meinen Augen als "Unterstand-Kartierer" ist das zwar ein Wetterschutz mit dem Zusatz der Wildbeobachtung (so wie es kartiert ist), aber da die Wildbeobachtung in dieser Region wohl der Hauptzweck ist, passt deine Variante etwas besser. Das building=hut würde ich aber eher lassen, oder?

Beste Grüße
Jokus13
Ze0zohk1 (2021-03-09 19:35:37+00:00): Hallo Jokus13,

ohne vor Ort gewesen zu sein, denn ich, dass building=hut schon passen könnte. Ich kartiere übrigens auch viele shelter (deswegen war es mir aufgefallen).

Danke für deine Mühe!

Viele Grüße
Jokus13 (2021-03-09 19:48:06+00:00): Alles klar, habe es geändert!

PS: Wenn dir beim Kartieren auf OSM Fotos von Schutzhütten/Unterständen fehlen, kannst du auch gerne bei  https://www.outdoor-karte.de vorbei gucken. Da sammeln wir Bilder und Infos über Hütten (aktuell nur amenity=shelter). 
Mit diesen Erkenntnissen aktualisiere ich häufig die teils recht veraltete Daten der Schutzhütten auf OSM. 

Beste Grüße
b-unicycling (2022-08-30 18:40:01+00:00): A tag with an upper case is quite unusual, what's more is that stile=gate does not make a lot of sense. Could you check against the wiki to see whether you could find a better fitting tag for it, please? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dstile
Anisa IRM-ED (2021-06-28 03:27:09+00:00): Olá, FrancyskoMarkes
Espero que você tenha um ótimo dia.
este cruzamento de estrada de faixa com reservatório (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/301972796). é uma estrada sujeita a inundações ou vau?
? Ou você tem alguma sugestão sobre o que devo fazer? Obrigada

traduzido pelo Google
FrancyskoMarkes (2021-06-29 18:33:46+00:00): In this case, the road passes over the reservoir wall.
in this model of reservoir construction, water generally does not pass over the road.
When the reservoir level reaches the maximum level, somewhere in the reservoir wall there is a place where the water will drain.

See this example of this type of construction, where the road passes the reservoir wall.

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/A%C3%A7ude_Banabui%C3%BA#/media/Ficheiro:Banabui%C3%BA_A%C3%A7ude.jpg
GinaroZ (2021-03-25 16:46:54+00:00): I've fixed the buildings you added - just be aware that the Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment here so needs to be offset before being used for editing :)
MoiraPrime (2021-03-06 05:16:41+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM. If you intended to just add a name to this building, you did it right.

If you want to learn more about mapping OSM we'd love to have you on the OpenStreetMap.us Slack! You can join it here: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/

There are a few Mississippi mappers in #local-mississippi and #local-us-southeast
jmapb (2021-05-20 14:21:29+00:00): Hi there... I'm trying to figure out what happened to the Long Path relation ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6198495 ) here in Sam's Point. It looks like you combined various parts of Loop Road into a single way. Can you explain what's going on here?
jmapb (2021-05-20 14:30:29+00:00): Looks like you did something similar to the Smiley Carriageway in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100512344 -- combined two segments into one, thereby adding extra bit of the carriageway into the Long Path relation.

If you see a road or path divided, don't necessarily assume that the two segments should be joined. Very often it's been split for a reason -- in these cases, because a portion of the road is part of a route relation (the Long Path.)

Don't worry, I'll fix these. Let me know if you have any questions, happy to help.

J
Walter Mayeku (2025-07-26 21:27:29+00:00): Hello Johanemilsson, 

Kindly confirm what feature was being mapped here. In the meantime I have tagged it as a barrier:fence
johanemilsson (2025-07-26 21:45:52+00:00): Hi! As far as I recall, it started with the airstrip, followed by the settlement, and then the surrounding land use.
Walter Mayeku (2025-07-26 21:47:46+00:00): Thank you for the quick feedback. Happy mapping!
johanemilsson (2025-07-26 21:53:17+00:00): Ah, you were referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/913967607. I’d guess it was a deforested area when I edited it four years ago — looks like it has overgrown since then.
Walter Mayeku (2025-07-26 21:59:12+00:00): That is the exact feature I was looking at, initially it didn't have any tag... would you recommend deletion of the feature? Though we still have the existing building
eggie (2021-03-05 20:20:18+00:00): Lijkt me prima zo... 
Gr eggie
wolfgang8741 (2021-03-09 00:26:43+00:00): Great job overall, but the trampoline park tag doesn't seem to be the right application for a single trampoline in a backyard. I'm not sure there is an existing tag for a single trampoline in a backyard like there is for a swimming pool.
mweper (2021-03-06 13:18:09+00:00): Matixme. Como te lo he comunicado varias veces, por favor, utiliza la etiqueta "layer" correctamente. La misma es exclusivamente para puentes, tuneles o techos. Si lo que quieres añadir es la cantidad de pisos del edificio, se utiliza "building:levels" y para indicar el nivel de piso en donde se encuentra un departamento u otro elemento, es con "level".
eggie (2021-03-05 20:26:12+00:00): Dag Macumba.. In OSM taggen we bij op de adresnodes. 
Het restaurant was al als zodadig gemapt op de adresnode. De voorgaande mapper was ikzelf.
Dus svp de restaurant= en adresinfo verwijderen van de gebouwomtrek.

MVG
eggie

MVG
eggie
Arlo James Barnes (2021-03-21 05:48:59+00:00): Hi! Have you considered joining the Openstreetmap U.S. Slack? (https://slack.openstreetmap.us)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-12 03:41:21+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169877705/history has maxspeed:source = CZ:urban that was added in this edit
is maxspeed:source intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source:maxspeed

maxspeed:type is also sometimes used as a key for such data, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type
hauke-stieler (2021-03-05 22:56:05+00:00): Hi,

du hast hier eine sehr große Fläche als Gebäude eingetragen, das war sicher nicht beabsichtigt oder? ;)

Entsprechende Gebäude existieren nämlich schon. Schau am besten nochmal drauf und korrigiere das ggf.

Grüße
Hauke
OsmMeister (2021-03-05 22:59:10+00:00): Moin Hauke, da hast du recht :{
Das war ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler, ich habe die Fläche der Baustelle in eine Fläche als Wohnheim geändert, ohne die passenden Proportionen des Gebäudes anzupassen.. :(
sanddune94 (2021-03-06 10:48:05+00:00): Dear Mapper, thanks for mapping, try not to merge nodes of features (i.e. two buildings, road, building, etc)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100513813
literan (2021-03-08 20:30:28+00:00): будьте аккуратнее, пожалуйста. Случайно навесили теги здания на точки, на подъезды, на внешние и внутренние контуры мультиполигонов. Подчистил.
eggie (2021-03-05 21:12:54+00:00): Oke.. bijna goed.. Het nummer staat er nog op.
Dat kan ook verwijderd worden, want er is een adresnode
Je edits
 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100514407

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-03-05 21:13:22+00:00): en dus de rest van het adres verwijderen.. 
Dan is het weer correct
eggie (2021-03-05 22:04:00+00:00): Het adres het ik weer verwijderd..
De BAG gegevens even zo toegevoegd
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Rooseveltlaan%20503&resultOffset=0&objectId=0344200000189495&geometry.x=134493.281&geometry.y=453828.27&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0344010000186394

Gr Eggie
PantherStrix (2021-03-07 10:54:04+00:00): Besten Dank! Das hatte ich auch schon lange mal vor, mich aber immer irgendwie davor gedrückt, weil der "Spaßfaktor" eher gering ist ;-)
Gruß
streckenkundler (2021-03-07 12:14:04+00:00): Ja gerne doch... Durch diese Verkleberei und Verbastelung von Straßen an Relationen waren hier an den Straßen auch was defekt...

Grüße zurück,

Sven
sanddune94 (2021-03-06 10:47:24+00:00): Dear mapper, thanks for mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100515106
timetrap (2021-03-16 05:24:18+00:00): Why you added 2 lanes at way 317100584#7?
timetrap (2021-03-16 06:16:49+00:00): And here?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317100591
emvee (2021-03-16 07:56:53+00:00): When I edited 317100591 I only added segregated=yes and changed the geometry

For 317100584 you are correct, I made an error adding lanes:forward=2.

I see you corrected things, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101094463, thanks!
timetrap (2021-03-16 08:39:26+00:00): Okay. I thought so :)

Then I will delete the lane tags.
treestryder (2021-04-15 03:07:31+00:00): Thank you for doing this. We were just talking about this problem at last month's meetup.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#OpenStreetMap_Michigan_Meetup
VLD087 (2021-04-15 16:59:07+00:00): Always happy to help, especially with this issue.
sanddune94 (2021-03-06 10:47:02+00:00): Dear Mapper, thanks for mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100515501
eggie (2021-03-06 18:50:54+00:00): Dag Arie,

Lastig te zien... 

Mbv https://satellietdataportaal.nl/
superview jan 2021 heb ik wat uitgelijnd en maxspeed 50 verwijderd van het fietspad.
Het parallelpad heb ik helemaal verwijderd.
Verder verbindingen met de zijstraten gemaakt. 
In JOSM kun je ook satalelliet dataportaal als achterhgrond zetten.
zie voor laatste link satellietdataportaal 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62966&p=4 

 

https://satellietdataportaal.nl/wms/Mosaics/service?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities 

Je eigen edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100515515
MVG
eggie
Arie den Boon (2021-03-07 20:14:21+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Dank voor de correcties en aanvullingen. Met de nieuwe satellietdata is het idd beter te zien. Voorlopig is het weer klaar, nu wachten op de komende veranderingen aan de Wenckebachweg.
Note_Fixer (2021-03-05 21:37:24+00:00): Covenant Life, line
sanddune94 (2021-03-06 10:46:20+00:00): Dear mapper, when mapping buildings, two buildings shouldn't overlap, in fact, non of the features should share nodes (only in specific cases);
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100515909
ElliottPlack (2021-09-05 18:18:48+00:00): Hello there and thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. In OSM, place classifications are not based on the name, but rather their relative importance and population. See the wiki article on place=city

> Use the place=city tag to identify the largest settlement or settlements within a territory, including national, state and provincial capitals, and other major conurbations.

In Maryland we typically use the town for places between 10 and 50k population.

> As of mid 2019, 63% of place=city have a population=* tag, of which the median value is 130,000, and 95% of place=city have a population=* value over 20,000

Mt Rainer was therefore classified village.
BCNorwich (2021-03-06 08:26:58+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I don't think Vespucci gives reasons or alternative tags when it says something is deprecated. So the problem here is inadvertent.

If a particular tag is deprecated that is not reasonable cause to delete it. It can be left to assist other mappers or amended if there is a better tag. The tag direction=up does impart knowledge to other users so for that reason ought not to be deleted. 

In this case, the tag key direction was also used for purposes other than steps. It was deprecated to tag key incline. So for steps, the tag direction=up should have been amended to incline=up. 

Deleting the tag removed information from the database. Leaving or amending the tag would not have lost information.

Thus I've added incline=up to the two sets of steps. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=steps . 

Regards Bernard
joeldn (2021-03-06 12:55:11+00:00): Thanks Bernard, I'm appreciative of the assistance and docs are very good:  "Add a way way along the length of the steps with the tag highway=steps on it.

If known, use the tag incline=up — when the direction of the way points upwards — or the tag incline=down, respectively.

In the past, the tag direction=up/down was used instead of the tag incline=up/down, but this was depreciated since the key direction=* is used for several other purposes"
IIVQ (2021-03-23 13:27:17+00:00): Hoi Skywave, 

Kan je nog eens naar de Turn Restrictions kijken? Lijkt hier iets niet lekker te gaan, ik moet komende vanuit Emmeloord linksaf de ventweg op en dan na de brug over de Gracht weer terug de Primary Peter Stuyvesantweg op...
aweech (2021-03-06 02:40:55+00:00): Hi,
I'm confused about this edit. US 6 has two lanes in each direction, is divided, 65 mph, and has controlled access. Seems like a slam-dunk case for a highway=motorway?
btwhite92 (2021-03-06 10:21:15+00:00): Hello,
Trunk roads may also be all of those things. In order for it to be a motorway, the road needs to be accessed by on/off ramp only with grade separated interchanges, which is not the case here. There should be a bare minimum of two sequential interchanges before considering promotion to 'motorway' as well, since trunk roads *may* have grade-separated interchanges, but motorways *must* use grade-separated interchanges. IE, a single interchange on its own is still not enough to be tagged 'motorway'. Generally, if a divided highway is switching back and forth between grade-separated and at-grade intersections, it's most likely trunk along its entire length. There was a discussion a couple weeks back on the talk-us mailing list, indicating fairly strong consensus for tagging this way, that I would encourage you to read for more information.
aweech (2021-03-06 15:57:24+00:00): That sounds perfectly reasonable. Thank you for the explanation!
Enock4seth (2022-10-04 21:55:32+00:00): hi,
can you clarify the use of these spaghetti roads?
marc__marc (2021-03-10 22:55:58+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1591918
il y a un tag wikipedia au lieu de website :)
Cordialement,
Marc
Super-Map (2021-03-11 17:04:27+00:00): '-)), it's good for me... Enjoy yourself...
jgon6 (2021-03-05 23:23:48+00:00): Russ,

Looking at newer imagery it looks like the golf course is gone now, and there are a bunch of houses there now. I did find this article that talks about it. also I am local and kinda remember hearing about this closing a few years back. I might try and drive up that way and check it out in person this weekend, if you don't have any confirmation that it's still open
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100517591
AgusQui (2021-03-27 17:05:36+00:00): El cambio de nombre de la av Rojo nunca se efectivizó
user_5359 (2021-03-06 04:21:36+00:00): Hello! Please use the key "source" instead of "source:" .
ivanbranco (2021-03-08 16:49:39+00:00): Hola Laura,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914021237
altura=3.50 is not a valid tag, you meant height=3.50 ?
Can you fix it?
Supaplex (2021-03-08 04:05:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8263054453
已經有了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100518928
Kachkaev (2021-09-04 14:40:23+00:00): 👋 vxpjt! I was hiking through Reigate recently and was routed via a path that did not seem to exist. I ended up deleting it – see https://osmcha.org/changesets/110719039/

If you live nearby, could you please validate my edit? Other pathways near Reigate Memorial Garden and Church Walk might need a check as well just in case if there was some replanning recently.

Cheers! Reigate is a beautiful place!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
tars4815 (2021-03-06 16:05:44+00:00): Hi, thanks for your valuable and important contribution to the project. Please always remember to square buildings with regular shapes: you could it by selecting their boundaries and then pressing Q on your keyboard, otherwise by right-clicking on the boundary and then selecting the square command. Also, be sure to map the footprint and not the roof. In conclusiong, avoid tagging buildings with tags different from building=yes: in remote mapathon we cannot understand with good accuracy weather a buildings is a terrace or an apartment. Thanks again for your contribution and time and keep working! :)
- Federica x PoliMappers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100519546
compdude (2021-05-13 01:51:27+00:00): A freeway has to have at least two consecutive interchanges in order to be considered a motorway. Please change these back; thanks!!
Viajero Perdido (2021-08-16 16:16:44+00:00): Hi Hendrikklaas.

Why do you consistently NOT load existing data for an area before adding stuff?  Here, you've duplicated your own effort, and added landuses, overlapping almost-identical ones that you added earlier.

(If you see a polygon breakage, that's unrelated - unless you map under different names - and should already be fixed.)
Viajero Perdido (2021-08-16 16:17:56+00:00): Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914029246
AntMadeira (2021-03-06 20:33:59+00:00): Olá, luigidelrey.
Reparei que fizeste algumas alterações no mapa nas Colmeias, mas gostaria de te dar algumas dicas.
Mapeaste as casas como "habitação isolada". O correto era mapeares como "casa", já que a habitação isolada está reservada para locais com toponímia (nome). Podes encontrar mais informação clicando no "i" ao lado do elemento, na coluna da esquerda do editor online.

Também vi que adicionaste uma área para o posto de combustível. Uma vez que ele já se encontrava mapeado, não é necessário estar a duplicar o seu mapeamento. Os elementos só devem ser mapeados uma vez, seja com um ponto ou com uma área. É sempre preferível mapear com área sempre que tal é possível determinar. No entanto, tu mapeaste a cobertura do posto e não o posto completo. Se quiseres mapear apenas a cobertura, também há uma etiqueta própria para isso.

Qualquer dúvida, não hesites em contactar-me.
Também tens o canal Telegram, onde a comunidade portuguesa de OSM se reúne para debater estes e outros assuntos relacionados com o OSM em Portugal.

Bons mapeamentos!

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
mapper377 (2021-03-06 04:09:56+00:00): The changeset comment should have said "... at Loud Dam in Oscoda Township, Iosco County, MI."
ElliottPlack (2021-03-22 14:39:13+00:00): DUGA, if you're cleaning up issues by another user, or really anything, try to be specific in your changeset comments. It helps resolve conflicts!