piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 15:10:43+00:00): Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 4G è errato. Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 13:47:04+00:00): grazie, ho risolto. Ciao, Martin
Hedaja (2022-10-06 23:20:28+00:00): Hi
while entering the new roadways, you deleted a couple old ones. This broke a few turn restrictions. Please check which restrictions are still relevant and fix them.

Thank you
ashybko_lyft (2022-10-07 09:56:47+00:00): Hi Hedaja
My name is Anna, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. You are right, while making edits, I didn't notice that I broke several relations. Thank you for pointing this out! I have removed some invalid turn restrictions, edited the relations that are still relevant and added new ones in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127137108. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience the broken relations have caused.

Regards,
Anna
Hedaja (2022-10-08 23:48:24+00:00): Hi Anna
thanks for coming back and fixing it. Looks good.

Happy mapping
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-27 14:25:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126688579
J-MUC (2022-10-18 20:31:14+00:00): Hello again,

hier nur kurz der Hinweis, dass es weiter südlich im Gebäude schon einen Knoten für die DPS Business Solutions gab, d.h. es jetzt einen doppelten Eintrag gibt.

Viele Grüße

J-MUC
J-MUC (2022-10-18 20:33:03+00:00): Hello again,

hier nur der Hinweis, dass der Knoten für das Büro im Innenhof platziert wurde, nicht innerhalb des Gebäudeumrisses.

Viele Grüße 

J-MUC
martinst (2022-10-08 16:36:38+00:00): Soweit ich weiß werden zählende Bezeichner immer als ref=* erfasst, name=* ist nur für Eigennamen.
Don't map for the renderer!
Ein anderer Nutzer editiert gerade wieder zurück:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127210186
streckenkundler (2023-09-03 19:49:12+00:00): @DWG: Achtung: Edit-War: Siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/benutzung-vom-tag-name-eigenname/103400
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Pol Dellaiera (2022-09-27 20:39:12+00:00): Bonjour,

Je constate plusieurs changements sur Nivelles sans la moindre explication.

Pensez-vous pouvoir ajouter une petite note explicative sur vos futurs changements?

Merci

Happy mapping!
L'imaginaire (2022-09-29 11:46:58+00:00): Pour plus d'explications et de conseils:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-10 11:20:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098233475/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
osmviborg (2022-09-27 10:26:00+00:00): Det her er noget roderi.
kortgodt (2022-09-27 10:37:01+00:00): Det er eng med vådområder og buskads, så du har jo engentligt ret.
osmviborg (2022-09-27 10:55:59+00:00): Prøv at holde de enkelte områder adskilt fra hinanden, der er meget overlap.
antonr (2022-09-27 19:56:09+00:00): Nysgerrig på hvorfor du synes områder skal holdes adskilt, osmviborg? Hvis der faktisk er både vådområde og buskads på stedet, så er det vel perfekt at de to ting overlapper i osm?
osmviborg (2022-09-27 20:17:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:wetland%3Dswamp
antonr (2022-09-27 21:00:06+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2023-06-06 14:58:00+00:00): Why you deleted landuse/landcover mapping?
You were using JOSM, it's so easy filter out the LULC without these deletions. Simply go to Windows -> Filter , and you can hide all the landuse and natural
Mar Mar (2023-06-06 21:34:02+00:00): Hi Ale Zena, I didn't want to hide it - I wanted to improve it. The area which you have restored is approx 200 km2 and clearly contains huge amounts of smaller elements: scrub, farmland, water etc. With this size, anybody who intends to provide more detail to landuse/landcover potentially will only increase the mess. Theoretically it can be done of course but real life tells us that people will either just pile up different landcovers on top of each other (which is against best practice) or try to integrate them in the existing multipolygon resulting in incomplete relations that in the end nobody is able nor willing to disentangle. Such big polygons only make sense if they really represent one big landcover, e.g. huge extensions of pure rainforest or sand deserts. In our case, classifying such extensions with one single tag that clearly contains hundreds if not thousand elements that can be differentiated seems as bad practice to me. My impression is that this obeys to the wish to see something painted with some"more or less" accurate tag so it doesn't look empty anymore. But this will only keep others away from making the map much better.
Ale_Zena_IT (2023-06-12 06:49:37+00:00): The former LULC coverage was done 3 years ago, and the area was really 90% scrub and wood.
If you write "My impression is that this obeys .." means you haven't checked which mappers did it (this is a best practice), otherwise you'd realized why someone is trying "to paint" some area. I started to recover the area doing some update based on Maxar images (this is my CS comment "Recovered a deleted relation, split by several parts; updated farmland (more farmland has still to add)#UNGSC #UniteMaps #MINUSCA ").

Have a good day
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2023-06-12 06:57:41+00:00): Sorry, I commented CS with my private account
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2022-11-23 15:18:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129286500 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping, the trash data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6558].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
perusluku (2022-09-27 11:28:27+00:00): Is there a reason you are deleting these nodes (ruins of Krepost Sveaborg land fortifications)?
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
AntMadeira (2022-09-27 19:09:15+00:00): Olá, csilvapq.
Vi que alteraste o nome da aldeia de Ferrarias para Ferrarias de S. João.
Não estarás a confundir com a Ferraria de São João, que fica uns bons quilómetros mais a leste?

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
csilvapq (2022-09-27 20:23:01+00:00): Tens razão. Fiz confusão entre Ferrarias e Ferrarias de S. João, que são duas localidades distintas, embora ambas pertencentes ao mesmo concelho Penela. Como posso anular a alteração?
csilvapq (2022-09-27 21:04:00+00:00): Já corrigi o engano. Obrigado pelo reparo.
Um abraço
AntMadeira (2022-09-27 23:53:32+00:00): São coisas que acontecem. ;)

Obrigado pela correção.

Abraço.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
wireguy (2022-10-04 22:58:24+00:00): Smikhnouski,  can you check your proprietary imagery?   the quarry relation is unclosed/broken.  But your imagery may show a building complex (residential?) instead of a quarry.  Maybe it should be removed/updated instead of left broken?
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2022-10-05 15:40:25+00:00): Hi wireguy!

Stepan (smikhnouski_lyft) is currently on vacation. My name is Yuliya and I am Stepan's teammate.
We are mappers on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for reaching out to us. Most likely the quarry’s boundaries were broken by accident while remodeling of highways. We apologize for that. 
These are Lyft’s proprietary aerial imagery dated 26 May 2022. They don't show any other  building complexes and in fact don't differ significantly from Bing Maps Aerial.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/150Lr-MbjqWONsGwOiTPNX_LeXAeuZrp9/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xApmEqF1xoIMlw_GwBNYJZVfDNK81o8G/view?usp=sharing

It looks like this area requires a huge remake of all landuse boundaries. Currently the Lyft OSM team focuses mainly on edits related to traffic roads. So I have only fixed the broken boundaries in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127054095.

I am sorry for any inconvenience the broken relation may have caused. 
Thank you for your contribution!

Best regards,
Yuliya
eggie (2022-09-27 11:27:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
De naam van het gebouw kan op de gebouwomtrek. 
Feedback  Wanneer De Basis hier 'kerkt' was het juiste getagd.
Waarom dat deze info verwijderen?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-27 11:36:35+00:00): De Basis heb ik weer even teruggezet. De diensten worden toch nog steeds gehouden vanuit dit gebouw? 
De naam stond al op de gebouwomtrek. Die hoeft niet op de adresnode. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-27 11:52:41+00:00): De URL Gebouw055 wordt als onveilig gekenmerkt door de virusscanner. Infectie Blacklist.
URL verwijderd.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
rhtb0 (2022-10-24 06:38:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
안녕하십니까
의미 있는 변경 집합 댓글(".")을 사용하십시오. 다른 사용자가 당신이 하는 일을 이해하는 데 도움이 되지 않습니다.
Frans S (2022-10-03 09:11:20+00:00): Hello. See my previous comment on your mappings. 
You mapped and tagged a waterway (drain) as waterfall.   Is your knowledge of the language insufficient ?
You also misspelled Highway wrong. Haghway instead of Highway. 
When you use the "fast draw"plug in,  it is easier to map and tag highways. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/FastDraw
Please keep that in mind.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126693338
JJIglesias (2022-09-27 14:15:24+00:00): Saludos. Las imagenes satelites que dispones son bastante buenas, NO se justifica que tires rayas sin seguir la forma (geometria) de las vias que estas poniendo que son de Bastante poble calidad. El mapa necesita un cierto nivel de precision no solamente dibujar rayas de un lado a otro.
Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-09-27 14:15:59+00:00): Saludos. Las imagenes satelites que dispones son bastante buenas, NO se justifica que tires rayas sin seguir la forma (geometria) de las vias que estas poniendo que son de Bastante pobre calidad. El mapa necesita un cierto nivel de precision no solamente dibujar rayas de un lado a otro.
Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-09-27 15:15:14+00:00): Saludos. Cuando coloques un camino agricola highway=track, debes colocar TAMBIEN las etiquetas: track_type= y surface= . Caso contrario creas una alerta de error en el Mapa.
Gracias
eggie (2022-09-27 12:00:24+00:00): Dag Rient..  Svp geen oneway=no gaan toevoegen aan reguliere wegen..
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-27 12:04:51+00:00): oneway=no verwijderd
Branko Kokanovic (2022-09-27 18:12:13+00:00): Zdravo, odakle ti svi ovi podaci o imenima ulica? Mozes li da ukazes na izvor? Hvala unapred
Branko Kokanovic (2022-09-28 05:44:17+00:00): Mada vidim da su ovo zapravo sve sporedne ulice, kao da samo dodajes ime sa glavne ulice na njih, tako mi deluje:)
luschi (2022-10-24 16:49:55+00:00): Hallo Christ¡,    
ich habe die Burgruine aufgrund der Urheberrechtsverletzung der von dir als source angegebenen Webseite entfern.

OSM gestattet es nicht Daten von Lizenzierten Karten, Google oder geschützten Webseiten zu kopieren.

Bitte achte bei weiteren Änderungen in OSM darauf.     

lg     
luschi
kubahahaha (2022-09-27 17:37:04+00:00): Zmieniłem z biura firmy na sklep meblowy
JJIglesias (2022-09-27 14:16:18+00:00): Saludos. Las imagenes satelites que dispones son bastante buenas, NO se justifica que tires rayas sin seguir la forma (geometria) de las vias que estas poniendo que son de Bastante pobre calidad. El mapa necesita un cierto nivel de precision no solamente dibujar rayas de un lado a otro.
Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-09-27 14:16:40+00:00): Saludos. Las imagenes satelites que dispones son bastante buenas, NO se justifica que tires rayas sin seguir la forma (geometria) de las vias que estas poniendo que son de Bastante pobre calidad. El mapa necesita un cierto nivel de precision no solamente dibujar rayas de un lado a otro.
Gracias
JJ
pitscheplatsch (2024-07-13 05:27:31+00:00): Partly reverted by https://osm.org/changeset/153817736
BCNorwich (2022-09-28 17:25:07+00:00): Hi, A lot of your newly added highways have been placed on top of existing highways. Thus disrupting routing. I think I've removed all the problem sections.

If a way needs amending (which I don't think is actually the case here) then the amendment should be to the existing way. Thus the ways history is properly maintained.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2022-09-27 12:25:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Dit is een veel te groot editgebied. Schuiven met de kaart geeft vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen van objecten.. Houd je edit gebied klein. Dan is je bijdrage ook te controleren. 
Ik zal straks even nauwkeuriger kijken en feedback geven. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-27 12:27:44+00:00): Je hebt een adresnode verplaatst naar een ander deel van de Soest.. Bewust of onbewust?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126695358

Sparrenlaan 22 Soest..
eggie (2022-09-27 12:29:17+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk.
Gebruik name= voor een straatnaam of pad en niet name:nl=
Plak de wegen niet vast aan de landuse.
WimWedde (2022-09-27 12:35:28+00:00): dank voor de feedback, het verplaatsen van een adresnode was onbewust, sorry. Hoe ongedaan te maken?
eggie (2022-09-27 12:39:19+00:00): Dat zal lastig zijn met edtor iD Ik zal het wel even doen. No problem.. Even zoeken in de Lange Duinen. 

De opnebare weg in het hoge noorden heb ik weer opne gezet. Die stond op slot met access=private. Zoom goed in en kijk goed welke wegen je bewerkt.
Veel plezier met mappen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-09-27 12:42:55+00:00): Adresnode hersteld
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-30 06:46:20+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
VictorIE (2023-06-16 17:05:41+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10043572571

Where there are loads of bollards, you can map them as a line. :)
eggie (2022-09-27 12:36:59+00:00): Ik heb access private verwijderd van de Driepoldersweg. Dit lijkt me niet geloofwaardig. 
De routering was nu onderbroken. 
Hier lopen ook fiets- en wandelroutes.
Het zal zeker ook geen eigen weg zijn.
Waarschijnlijk heb  je de tags op een verkeerd wegdeel gezet. Let svp op wat je doet want de kaart is kwetsbaar.
Ook svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-27 12:50:49+00:00): Dag Taka.. Beter niet schuiven met de kaart. Je verplaatst dan ongemerkt objecten (nodes)  met alles wat er aan vast zit.
Houd het gebied van een bewerking veel kleiner. Bv een straat en doet meer uploads desnoods.
Heb je bewust of onbewust kunstwerk de Panter verplaatst?

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126696541

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-27 12:59:07+00:00): Beeld de Panter staat ook nog een keer in de hoofdstraat 22 ? .. en op de parkeerplaats /
Kan een van de twee weg?
Taká (2022-09-27 14:02:21+00:00): Dag eggie,

Wat heb ik precies verschoven in dit geval? Ik ben nauwkeurig te werkgegaan om alleen nodes te verplaatsen, en dan om precies te zijn alleen nodes die in iD wit worden aangegeven (en dus niet verbonden zijn aan andere objecten) De enige twee niet-witte nodes die ik verplaatst heb waren de "oversteken" van de fietspaden over de straat, maar ook aan die nodes is alléén deze straat en de fietspaden verbonden. 

Wat betreft de Panter(s); het gaat hier om twee beelden die, ondanks de afstand tussen beiden, bij elkaar horen; zeg maar één installatie, maar twee beelden. Als er een betere manier is om dit naar OSM te vertalen hoor ik het graag.

-Taka
eggie (2022-09-27 14:51:34+00:00): Dag Taka...  Editor iD heeft de vervelende eigenschap dat je selecteert met de linker muis, maar ook schuift met diezelfde muisknop.
In editor josm schuif je met de rechtermuisknop. Vandaar dat ik uit voorzorg die tip geef. Als er twee panters zijn heb je uiteraard niets per abuis verschoven.
Je hebt één beeld verschoven naar een andere plaats Zie achavi..., maar kennelijk bewust. 
Van de Kapalaan R straat nr 14 naar de parkeerplaats rechts. Klopt dat?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126696541

Hier zo'n voorbeeld waar iemand een adesnode heeft verplaatst door dat zelfde geschuif. We zien het doorlopend.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126695358

Er is zelfs iemand geweest die een hoek van een kerk over de halve wereld heeft getrokken. De kaart van Nederland had een week een  bruinzweem.

Vandaar de opmerking.

Veel plezier met mappen verder. 
eggie
Taká (2022-09-27 15:08:04+00:00): Aha! Mijn grote vrees was dat het de fietspaden betrof, zeker aangezien jij vervolgens deze leek te hebben teruggezet... maar ik zie nu ook dat deze changesets iets anders betroffen.
Nee inderdaad, die verschuiving was helemaal bewust. Ik ging er van uit dat die node de "tweede panter" moest voorstellen, dus heb ik die naar de juiste plaats geleid. Op die locatie is verder niets te vinden. 

En wat betreft iD en JOSM, ik ben onverwachts vrij innig met beiden bekend, aangezien ik deze in een ander project al wat langer gebruik.  't Liefste zou ik ook JOSM op OSM gebruiken, maar helaas is het niet zo simpel om dat programma voor twee doeleinden tegelijk in te stellen... zodoende. 

Fijne dag verder!
eggie (2022-09-27 16:00:41+00:00): Nou.. Ik heb de kruising bij de Polanenhof aangepast.
oneway=yes verwijderd bij het eerste stuk.. anders zit je hier gevangen. 
De fietspaden klopten wel. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-09-28 06:57:25+00:00): Verder 'werkten' de fietsoversteken niet voor fietsers omdat de stukjes tussen Nassaulaan en zijstraten op oneway=yes stonden. Die staan nu allemaal op oneway=no
Dat zijn van die kleine dingen die mappers vaak niet in de gaten hebben. 
De oneway hoort voorbij de kruising van het fietspad te beginnen. 
Dit even ter Leering ende Vermaeck. 
Gr eggie
SomeoneElse (2022-11-21 09:18:25+00:00): Hello immavasa,

Unfortunately, your edit here has broken a cycle route here.

Before:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nGa

After:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nGb

and also the designation tagging was lost from the road:
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=20&lat=51.2476049&lon=-0.136456

(on that map public bridleways appear in bloue, and cycle routes with purple dots).

Please do re-add the way to any missing routes and also reinstate the designation tagging.  If you'd like any help doing this please let us know.

Best Regards,
Andy