piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
frodrigo (2017-01-21 20:27:52+00:00): Hello. You name bus stop in Spanish with "Bus Turístico". I see two problemes, it's not the bus stop name, and the bus stop was already named with the name tag. E.g in http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2164385140/history check name and name:es. Can I remove all your name:es=Bus Turístico ?
mueschel (2016-11-10 20:53:33+00:00): Hallo,
was ist die Bedeutung von dem Tag "bicycle_ride =yes" am Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148862023 ? Das gibt es bisher nicht bei OSM.
Gruß, Jan
rskedgell (2017-01-09 23:19:48+00:00): The node representing "Vue Stratford City at Westfield" is in the wrong place (on the low-level DLR platform at Canning Town station), rather than within the bounds of Westfield Stratford City ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130911408 ).
maraf24 (2016-11-08 22:40:54+00:00): A jakie jest źródło tych danych? Bo to co było, to są dane z gminy. I przy kolejnej aktualizacji tego terenu stare adresy zostaną przywrócone.
Jeśli dane gminy są błędne, musisz to opisać na trzcinsko-zdroj.e-mapa.net w Zgłoś Problem.
bodzionipx (2016-11-09 11:19:57+00:00): Tak mają błędne dane i bardzo bardzo przestarzałe. Widocznie nikt nigdy nie edytował tej mapy. Ale Gmina wie o prawidłowych nazwach miejscowości bo nawet adres mam że to cieplikowo i do tego znaki wszystko mamy oznaczone poprawnie. Mapy papierowe też są prawidłowe. Tylko te w sieci zawierają błąd od zawsze. Podejrzewam że jakiś Józek po pijaku kiedyś źle oznaczył i tak zostało.
maraf24 (2016-11-09 12:34:27+00:00): trzcinsko-zdroj.e-mapa.net jest oficjalnym zbiorem danych i urząd ma obowiązek go prowadzić rzetelnie.
Ma on też nie więcej niż kilka lat, a przy wprowadzaniu do niego danych są one - teoretycznie - weryfikowane. 
W innych miejscach w Polsce dane w tym systemi są bardzo dobrej jakości, błędy są pojedyncze. Zgłaszanie błędy są poprawione w ciągu kilku dni (sprawdziłem).
Jeśli jesteś pewien adresów, zmień wartość source:addr na np. survey (lub jakiś inny).
maraf24 (2016-11-08 22:22:13+00:00): Brak nazwy miejscowości i kodu pocztowego.
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-30 13:24:06+00:00): Why did you flip name:ar and name:en?
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-01 16:47:54+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49170691
fims7 (2022-09-05 06:05:27+00:00): Добрый день, Павел.
Судя по документам поданным в гати (по их ордеру сейчас здесь идет ремонт) часть этой УДС все-таки является улицей Котлякова.
Ордер 
http://xc.gati-online.ru/allinfo.php?key=438165
Проект работ
http://xc.gati-online.ru/DATA/DEPOSITORIES/16/1553006S009.pdf
Pavel239 (2022-09-05 10:43:13+00:00): Первичный и основной документ - это РГИС.
А ГАТИ просто могли карту не обновить или ещё по какой другой причине ошибиться, это несущественно.
Pavel239 (2022-09-05 10:44:31+00:00): В РГИСе нет такой улицы и сейчас. Если интересно докопаться до истины - откройте Реестр и попробуйте найти её там. Это даст окончательный ответ.
fims7 (2022-09-05 11:42:12+00:00): В Постановлении Правительства Санкт-Петербурга от 17.03.2011 N 300  числиться под пунктом 607 ул. Котлякова
https://www.gov.spb.ru/static/writable/ckeditor/uploads/2022/04/01/54/%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%8C_%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B6%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_1_%D0%9F%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B0_%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%BA%D1%82-%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B0_%D0%BE%D1%82_17.03.2011.pdf
Pavel239 (2022-09-05 17:23:41+00:00): Смотрите актуальный Реестр от 03.08.2022 - https://www.assembly.spb.ru/ndoc/doc/0/8424731.
Там никакого Котлякова нет.
AR88 (2016-11-08 15:00:47+00:00): falscher Kommentar zum Änderungssatz, ich habe nur Gebäude aus Bing maps eingezeichnet
Andrea Musuruane (2018-03-19 13:18:08+00:00): Ciao, highway=living_street non è usato in Italia: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street Ciao, Andrea
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-11-09 08:11:46+00:00): Hi,
do you have the names for the bar and the fast food place you have added to the map?
Are you sure about the locations? The bar appears to be in the old Aviva car park and the fast food place appears to be in the Kitchen Accessory shop (used to be Budgens)
joost schouppe (2016-11-29 18:37:54+00:00): Hi Felix,
What is the use of this relation? It only has one member and no tags...
joost schouppe (2016-12-09 20:31:45+00:00): I went and removed the relation.
RoterEmil (2017-01-12 18:16:02+00:00): Hallo sandrow75,
aus Versehen hast Du die falsche Straße umbenannt (siehe auch genannte PLZ in der offiziellen Pressemitteilung: https://www.berlin.de/ba-pankow/aktuelles/pressemitteilungen/2016/pressemitteilung.529873.php). Hier ist die tatsächlich umbenannte Marie-Grünberg-Straße zu finden: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190425288
Deine Umbenennung habe ich bereits wieder rückgängig gemacht ;)

Schöne Grüße!
sandrow75 (2017-01-17 18:21:10+00:00): Danke .
highflyer74 (2016-11-09 09:02:12+00:00): Hallo Micha und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

Daß es sich bei dem Schulgebäude um ein solches handelt, wird bereits klar, da das gesamte Schulgelände bereits als Schule erfasst ist. Das Gebäude selbst ist als Multipolygon Relation erfasst (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon). Wenn Du an Relationen (bzw. Elementen, die zu einer Relation gehören) herumschraubst, ist immer Vorsicht geboten, damit die Relation nicht beschädigt wird. Häufig kommt das bei ÖPNV Linien vor.

Worauf ich aber eigentlich hinaus will: name=* wird ausschliesslich für Eigennamen verwendet. Die Funktion (nämlich daß es ein Schulgebäude ist) übernehmen andere Tags. In diesem Fall building=school (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dschool). Dann wäre es allerdings sinnvoll, alle zur Schule gehörenden Gebäude als building=school zu taggen).

Dies nur als Tipp. Auch Dinge wie name=Parkplatz oder name=Briefkasten sind falsch. Wenn etwas keinen offiziellen Namen hat, lässt man name=* weg.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM ans Herz legen.

Ein tolles Tutorial, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

http://einklich.net/temp/osm-tutorial.pdf

Bei Fragen: immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB,

Oliver
literan (2016-11-09 11:14:09+00:00): если там действительно recycling (т.е. раздельный сбор мусора) то лучше сразу указать, какого именно
StephaneP (2016-11-09 13:21:19+00:00): Hello !

Je crois que les modifs que tu as faites sur la mine désaffectée sont incorrectes, car le tag abandonned était déjà présent, et disused s'utilise en préfixe, comme disused:landuse=quarry
SomeoneElse (2016-11-08 18:37:26+00:00): Hello,
You've created an untagged node here http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4489068330/history .  Presumably that was by accident?  What were you trying to do - if you explain what it was perhaps someone can help?
Best Regards,
Andy
Noen (2021-11-29 17:30:55+00:00): Hi! You connected the OSM element for the city of Hamar with the Wikidata element for the municipality of Hamar in the this changeset, and as a result Mapbox now labels the city as "Hamar Municipality". Please use more care when adding Wikidata tags in the future.
user_5359 (2016-11-08 18:33:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your objects please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland !
user_5359 (2016-11-08 18:30:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your object please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood !
user_5359 (2016-11-08 18:27:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.

If you need help: You  are welcome!
naoliv (2016-11-08 21:16:39+00:00): Sobreira, de onde você está pegando os nomes das ruas?
naoliv (2016-11-08 21:17:15+00:00): É do Google?
user_5359 (2016-11-08 19:34:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information (like Home) from residential or owner to a residential building!
user_599436 (2016-11-08 22:27:52+00:00): Please review the discussion on this changeset, the situation is the same. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43187605

This is the object that corresponds with the wikidata tag:https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3169206

Mass-adding tags without fixing the underlying data makes more bad data.
ridixcr (2016-11-09 13:49:02+00:00): Thank you for highlighting this. I have removed the tag from this node and will follow the discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43187605 on how we should fix this.
*Martin* (2019-05-10 21:02:08+00:00): Hi Steve. Please add correct tagging as these are not tourist viewpoints. Thanks.
user_5359 (2016-11-09 19:31:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: A street didn’t has an address (only the building on the side of the streets)
user_5359 (2016-11-09 19:32:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.
user_5359 (2016-11-09 19:24:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice "Playground Walkway“ isn’t a name of the way, tht is a description. For the courts please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
gpstracks (2016-11-09 07:02:56+00:00): Buongiorno.
Volevo avvertirla che in questo changeset è stato cancellato un vasto poligono landuse=residential.
Se non è intenzionale la modifica va ripristinata.

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43497030

Grazie
Almtesh (2016-11-08 20:16:33+00:00): De plus, la vente de « Weed », à ma connaissance, n'est pas autorisé à cet endroit.
user_5359 (2016-11-09 19:20:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Alan Trick (2016-11-25 18:01:56+00:00): Hi Frannya, welcome to openstreetmap. I think you're change to East Gibson Street in front of the high school might not be right. The map here is a lot more than just a visual map and by changing to a "primary road" (a medium sized highway) it will confuse navigation apps like car GPS units.

To read more on this see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
user_5359 (2016-11-09 19:12:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The value "Small part of the mall" isn't a name, it is a description of the building.
Gumeg (2016-11-18 13:19:28+00:00): Вы же живете/бываете в этом городке? Брали с улиц номера зданий?
Luzandro (2019-10-04 05:08:58+00:00): Hallo Nicole,

du hast hier bei zahlreichen Gebäuden name="Garage" gesetzt. Bitte verwende nicht den Namen für solche generischen Beschreibungen, sondern setze die entsprechenden Eigenschaften, wie in diesem Fall building=garage. Im ID-Editor im Webbrowser brauchst du dazu nur nach dem Objekttyp "Garage" suchen und "Einzelgarage" auswählen.

siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
und
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dgarage

Danke
Andreas
user_5359 (2016-11-09 15:33:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
user_5359 (2016-11-09 15:27:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I move back the street crossing Corrin Ave NW and Whitesell Str NW. Picture exists.
utack (2016-11-09 16:30:58+00:00): Macht es hier vielleicht mehr Sinn mtb:scale und mtb:scale:uphill anzubringen als oneway?
Dass der Weg bergauf in der Praxis nicht zu fahren ist kann ja sein (mtb:scale:uphill=6 dann), aber dass hier offiziell ein oneway Verbot ist kann ich mir nicht vorstellen.
utack (2016-11-09 16:32:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
utack (2016-11-09 16:33:04+00:00): Verzeihung, 5 statt 6 uphill
"Way is too steep and/or difficult to ride uphill. We need this level for signalling to other mtbikers that on this part they have to push and carry the bike. "
Carnildo (2016-11-08 23:51:58+00:00): Is the name of this actually "Residential Development"?  The "name" field for objects should only be used for actual names, not descriptions.
KrzysztZ (2020-10-21 19:17:30+00:00): ulica Zbożowa tagowana jako "residential":
openstreetmap.org/way/349579624
na odcinku od ul. Prof. Aleksandra Gelli do Ignacego Paderewskiego wygląda tak:
https://imgur.com/XCip91R
https://imgur.com/zYTs2TN
https://imgur.com/8b8HVfY
ulice Zielona, Żytnia też są ledwo przejezdne lub wcale ich nie widać w terenie. Na SIP gminy Majdan Królewski są zaznaczone, jednak dopóki nie powstanie tam zabudowa to raczej nie będą używane ani lepsze. Mam je zmienić je na highway=track  zgodnie z zebranymi lokalnie informacjami?
Yunkers (2020-10-22 14:28:41+00:00): Zasadniczo kategorie dróg dobieramy wg ich zastosowania, a nie jakości. Jeśli służą jako dojazd do budynków. Ciężko mi sobie wyobrazić, żeby droga w tym stanie służyła jako dojazd do czegokolwiek, więc można w tych "złych" miejscach dać track. Dobrze jest dodać do tracków tag tracktype. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:tracktype
user_5359 (2016-11-09 15:20:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Carnildo (2016-11-08 23:56:56+00:00): Buildings should not be placed inside other buildings -- it makes it hard for map renderers to draw things correctly.  The preferred way to map a building containing multiple businesses is to draw the outline as a generic building, then add a "point" feature for each business.
archie (2020-02-14 16:35:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452152325/history. Var vänlig läs om name-taggning i hjälpen som jag skickat till dig tidigare. Titta på det här. Du taggade med "Bilverkstad" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452152325/history). Detta är en generiskt namn som inte skall åsättas. Ange namnet på bilverkstaden istället. Du som har lokalkännedom vet väl under vilket namn verksamheten drivs. Jag har ändrat taggningen till car_repair. V v kolla och finjustera. Tack.
user_5359 (2016-11-09 14:32:05+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte nicht alte Objekte löschen und neu zeichnen, sondern einfach neue Tag hinzufügen (ggf. nur über Expertensicht möglich)
carloost (2016-11-09 15:42:38+00:00): Hallo,
das ist mit iD nicht möglich. Gibts für diese Vorgehensweise einen besonderen Grund?
user_5359 (2016-11-09 20:09:59+00:00): Hallo, auch wenn iD nicht mein Standardeditor ist: Direkt beim ersten Versuch ist mir das gelungen. Da an diesen Kommunikationsweg keine Anhänge möglich sind, bräuchte ich eine E-Mail-Adresse um den Nachweis zu führen. Für die E-Mail-Adresse am besten auf meinen Usernamen klicken und mir eine bilaterale Nachricht schicken.
carloost (2016-11-09 20:50:42+00:00): Hallo,
hab das nicht gleich gecheckt, das funktioniert jetzt auch mit iD. Danke für ihre Hilfe!
Carnildo (2016-11-09 00:11:19+00:00): The "name" field should only be used for names, not descriptions.  Most parking lots don't have names.
Carnildo (2016-11-09 00:15:08+00:00): Is this a fire station?  Fire stations have their own building type, so they can be indicated as such with an appropriate icon or other marking.
user_5359 (2016-11-09 14:59:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

In this case I add already the tag amenity=parking.
SHARCRASH (2016-11-09 12:07:12+00:00): Woodpeck your edits are flawed! You are breaking the elements i created! They didn't need any edit! I'm astonished that someone who has such a position like yours within OSMF makes SUCH MISTAKES! This is not right, you made a circular track whereas it's an area of woods: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431452509
This has been changed in service area whereas i had set it as grass, it's not a wide service area! Proof: https://ssl.panoramio.com/photo/57774478
You broke this, not anymore rendered: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6312533#map=16/49.6038/5.9320
What else have you boken and isn't anymore faithful to reality...??? By OSM rules and definition you are vandalizing OSM data! Also you didn't reply to my message which is really showing a lack of interest for contributors who devote their time!
SHARCRASH (2016-11-09 12:09:26+00:00): The element which i was talking about and must be grass instead of a service area is this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452158351
SHARCRASH (2016-11-09 12:11:30+00:00): This place was filled with an area element: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.60999/5.90915
SHARCRASH (2016-11-09 12:21:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.60357/5.90829
SomeoneElse (2016-11-09 12:41:16+00:00): @SHARCRASH You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431452509/history as a circular highway=track 4 months ago.  Are you saying that that is incorrect?
SHARCRASH (2016-11-09 12:51:19+00:00): No, i haven't plotted that as a circular track, that's user woodpeck altering and degrading data! I had plotted that element as a MP wood. Something is flawed in the recording process of the history, some edits within MPs are not being recorded.

Also user stereo is making degradations:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43501833

What's all this non sense???
woodpeck (2016-11-09 13:57:03+00:00): Yes, it appears that the "reconstruct polygon" function has a bug when it comes to copying tags. I'll investigate and fix this before I continue, but I definitely intend to "degrade" many more multipolygons created by SHARCRASH - essentially all those where several otherwise unrelated objects have been plunged into a multipolygon just because they're all wood or so.
SHARCRASH (2016-11-09 14:14:24+00:00): Unrelated??? Of course they are JUST woods! Would you care to explain me what makes them so special and so individual one from the other??? And if they are not for some very local reason, the MP can still easily be edited by someone who needs to make that specification. You, what you are doing here is just converting the MP i created in simple polygons just for the sake of... being polygons! So in my humble opinion waste time and satisfy one only person who doesn't like working out with MPs whereas it's an elements integrally part of OSM's data. And if you deem that i am not using the element as it should... well i don't think that i am the only one doing so in OSM! There are countless people doing far worse (inaccurate tagging, inaccurate positioning, abusively overlayering elements...).
SomeoneElse (2016-11-09 14:25:13+00:00): @SHARCRASH, heres an example where it makes sense to have two polygons linked together: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4807529 .  Here the two pieces of natural=wood together form "Breck's Plantation" - they are logically one thing.  However it doesn't make sense to join things into one multipolygon just because they have the same tag.  For example; where I'm sat at the moment there's a car park to my left and one a little way over to my right - they are both car parks but aren't in the same multipolygon because they are different car parks.
SHARCRASH (2016-11-09 14:39:38+00:00): I know that Andy. But why should i be forbidden to use MPs to ease my contributions within iD while i respect in general real features and what's been ruled out in Wiki! This editor doesn't have the complex plugin tools that JOSM has! Using only polygons would slow tremendously the workflow since i would have to connect to each node, displace node by node or even disconnect and then reconnect node by node to create accurately or edit with better precision different. This used to drive me crazy and waste huge time in my early ages as OSM contributor. But since i work with MPs i'm the only one who has been contributing so much in such a short time. Just look all the southern region of Luxembourg for proof! I also cared to explain these reasons in my profile.
muralito (2016-11-09 02:57:16+00:00): Si no hay barrera, no hay que mapearla.
Ojota (2016-11-09 04:42:41+00:00): En la otra entrada "free-flow" (la de Av. Sarmiento), está mapeada...
muralito (2016-11-09 13:49:20+00:00): Ya deje a esa otra sin barrera que es como tiene que ser, y agregue la relación  enforcement=toll a esta que le había faltado.
SHARCRASH (2016-11-09 12:50:31+00:00): Guillaume, do you know really what you are doing? You are breaking elements! That's vandalism within OSM data!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/384165265
And here you are putting layers over layers and fences over fences, is that what you call MP simplification??? That's awkward editing! https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.52468/6.15673 It doesn't look like that you considered the implications and consequences of your actions if everybody would do the same as you, whereas in terms of third party services or server resources.

What else... ??? Can you just stop degrading what has been already plotted and let things as they are...
SHARCRASH (2016-11-09 12:58:24+00:00): By the way, by viewing your flawed edits... I think that can you stop looking over my shoulder and patronizing me... I haven't said anything for months, trying to be conciliating. But since you are being hypocrite and quiete disrespectful, enough is enough.
muralito (2016-11-09 02:54:40+00:00): Las cosas llevan nombre si lo tienen. Si no, no. 
Lo del acceso por telepeaje va en descripcion y/o se describe con etiquetas.
Ojota (2016-11-09 04:43:40+00:00): O.k., pero la otra entrada "free-flow" está marcada así. Y el nombre es el que figura en el extracto de pasadas del Telepeaje
SK53 (2016-12-07 11:15:46+00:00): Please dont add amenity=post_box to the boxes used by postmen to store mailbags whilst on their rounds. Post Box must be a place where one can post letters.
alexkemp (2016-12-07 11:25:35+00:00): Whilst happy to be told what I've done wrong, if you do not add the positive bit (how to do it correctly) your actions + words are a waste of space.
SK53 (2016-12-07 13:04:34+00:00): Adding erroneous info the tag amenity=post_box is indeed wrong. Positive action is "dont do it again" & "delete the erroneous tag" & then we wont get a) someone posting notes about it; and b) someone wont use it to post a letter. It's not my job to find suitable tags for things I dont map.
alexkemp (2016-12-07 14:07:36+00:00): So you reckon that I should just keep throwing darts at the [table of amenities](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity?uselang=en-GB) until I finally hit one that is acceptable to you? If you cannot define which is the acceptable tag then I will not accept your definition that the one used is unacceptable.

You state:
> Post Box must be a place where one can post letters.

Not in the Wiki definition, it is not. *amenity=post_box* currently states:
> A box for the reception of mail. Alternative mail-carriers can be tagged via operator=*

Either we all refer to an independent, unbiased definition or OSM is lost.

This is a piece of street-furniture owned by the Royal Mail that receives post; exactly equivalent already to the *Wiki* definition. *“There are more pillar boxes in this universe than you comprehend, Mr Bond”*.

You state that adding what you wrongly call *“an erroneous tag”* caused *“a) someone posting notes about it”*. You are not a very good intelligence agent, Mr Bond. In my [original tags](http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4114255916/history) I put *note=NOT for public post; undefined purpose*. ~3 months ago the chap from York explained what they were for. Now, *that* is helpful. Having corroborated that info I then changed all the notes on existing nodes.

You further insinuate that my adding what you wrongly call *“an erroneous tag”* will cause *“b) someone (to) use it to post a letter”*. Only if they have the key to open it, Mr Bond.

These boxes fit exactly into the description in the Wiki. I'm sorry that you do not like my actions. I'm changing nothing.
user_5359 (2016-11-09 14:52:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you mean https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Devents_venue ?