piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
KVLA-HRO-Mei (2020-02-26 09:48:10+00:00): Ich bekam gerade den Hinweis vom Straßenbauamt, dass dieser Abschnitt wirklich B 96 n heißt. Du hattest das ja expl. geändert, gab es dafür einen bestimmten Grund?
user_10241830 (2020-01-30 18:49:40+00:00): Hallo,

war die Löschung der Otterberger Straße in Gundersweiler Absicht?
Gaessje (2020-01-31 11:44:38+00:00): Nein, danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe es korrigiert.
czubi (2019-11-30 13:46:32+00:00): Hallo,
ich versuche mal einiges zu kommentieren.
Eisdiele->ok
Reiterhof-> nicht alle Gebäude sind Reistställe, die Gebäudemrisse kannst du auch ein wenig exakter zeichnen. Und jedes Gebäude einzeln
Kindergarten->blende dir bitte als Hintergrundbild den ESRI Layer ein. Der Umriss ist komplett verschoben. Besser ist die FLäche als amenity=kindergarten zu taggen und das Gebäude als building=kindergarten
Friseur->ok
Baumschule->irgendein Haupttag sollte dahin, entweder ein shop=* oder ein office=company o.ä.
Grundschule-> siehe kindergarten
viloan (2019-11-29 18:21:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jason LaPierre (2019-11-29 18:21:00+00:00): 480 Lanelle Place, Newport News, VA 23608
eggie (2019-11-29 18:47:15+00:00): Dag Jordan.. Probeer te voorkomen dat je de paden aan de landuse vastplakt. Wanneer je de linker alt toets gebruikt schijnt iD niet te plakken.
Hier je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=77740715

MVG,
Eggie
jordan_osm (2019-11-29 19:34:39+00:00): Dag eggie,
Bedankt voor je comment. Ik heb het pad weer losgemaakt van land use
eggie (2019-11-29 19:59:48+00:00): Top! :)
user_5359 (2019-11-29 21:14:38+00:00): Hallo! Relationen mit nur einem Mitglied sind nicht notwendig!
ma-rt-in (2019-11-30 15:26:51+00:00): Ich vermute ich wollte mal anfangen die 394 als neue Bus-Relation anzulegen. Werde die Relation mal andersweitig benutzen.
!bm (2019-11-29 21:09:13+00:00): Hallo Kili2610, zunächst willkommen zu OSM! Die Änderungen scheinen widersprüchlich/unsinnig und entsprechen auch nicht den aktuellst verfügbaren mapillary-Bildern (von 2019-09/10). Daher zurückgesetzt in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77740891
Bitte (ggf nocheinmal) Blick ins Wiki werfen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany -- sollte es dennoch Unklarheiten geben, bitte nachfragen! 
--besteGrüße!bm
!bm (2019-11-29 21:11:05+00:00): ^ Korrektur: zurückgesetzt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77743729
opendcc (2019-11-29 23:01:38+00:00): Hallo,

wenn man ein abgerissenes Gebäude mit mit dem lifecycle präfix kennzeichnet, dann ist es für andere Mapper sichtbar, dass es weg ist. Sonst malt Dir das einer wieder vom Luftbild wieder rein ...
5m4u9 (2019-12-05 21:38:30+00:00): es mejor utilizar clinica en lugar de hospital
shuui (2020-01-24 00:00:03+00:00): Hi, I'm curious why the name of this train station was changed? Milwaukee has 2 train stations. One at the airport and one downtown at the Intermodal Station. The website lists the name as "Milwaukee, Wisconsin - Intermodal Station."
clay_c (2020-01-27 17:04:02+00:00): It shows up on Amtrak's schedules as simply "Milwaukee", although the complex is of course called "Milwaukee Intermodal Station". I chose to leave the name of the building as such, which I typically do in cases like this.

I'm assuming you're local to Milwaukee, so I'll defer to your judgment on whether the longer name is necessary for disambiguation. I think it mostly boils down to this question: if a visitor asks "how do I get to the Milwaukee train station," would a local typically assume they meant Intermodal, or would they ask which one they meant?
shuui (2020-01-27 17:47:36+00:00): I think if someone asked about how to get to the Milwaukee train station, the intermodal would be assumed one unless you live on the south side of the county. Either way, I think your explanation makes good sense and I'll just leave it as is. Thanks for taking the time to explain!
woodpeck (2019-11-29 19:13:58+00:00): This was a mistake, sorry, I am reverting it again.
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-29 19:14:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77741829 where the changeset comment is: repair a revert accident
mueschel (2019-11-30 09:28:28+00:00): Hi,
the details you added to these schools use yet another completely new scheme for numbers of teachers and students at schools.
I strongly recommend to look at other projects first and reuse their tags!
Unfortunately, nobody cared about documenting them, but you can find them on https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org

Just some examples other groups used:

staff_count:teachers
education:staff_female
capacity:teachers   (used 10000 times)
education:teachers (used 1000 times)
education:teachers_female (used 1000 times)

Please use one of these, this makes using the data so much easier.


And you use the key school:ownership. This should be  operator:type.


Cheers
Jan
sejohnson (2019-12-06 16:14:07+00:00): Hi Jan,
Thanks for your comments. I'm facilitating a group in collecting data and we're determining whether some of this data even belongs on OSM. So we'll correct this soon. Thanks again.
sorcrosc (2019-11-29 23:23:35+00:00): Maybe there was a problem here. Now all name=* have value en:something

Lorenzo
A67-A67 (2019-11-29 23:57:46+00:00): It seems that the wikipedia-tags of at least some continents also have been changed  from English (largest articles) to Esperanto. However these were not reverted in this changeset.
woodpeck (2019-11-30 08:41:37+00:00): Gah... my mistake, I'm fixing it.
TravGW (2019-12-02 14:23:43+00:00): You some how changed the wikipeadia tag for the Caspian Sea to Antarctia. I fix.
woodpeck (2019-12-02 18:30:06+00:00): Thank you.
gendy54 (2019-12-07 22:07:33+00:00): Pas de pb pour la modif. Merci
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77742587
eggie (2019-11-29 20:55:53+00:00): Oke ... zo moet het
Gr eggie
MapMakerGal (2019-11-29 20:55:15+00:00): Non elimines os nomes da rúas das rotondas xa que se perde información moi valiosa, exemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/302922959/history
Hai un proxecto chamado #1rúa1nome (#1calle1nombre), e o seu obxectivo é acadar o 0% de vías sen nome, se eliminas estes imos cara atrás...
O resto do teu changeset é impecábel coma sempre, segue así! Estamos aquí pra aprender tamén :)
!bm (2019-11-29 20:35:06+00:00): Evt nur name="Kind" ohne Zusatz "Hörgeräte" - benötigt re-survey
!bm (2019-12-01 20:44:40+00:00): Name passt so, Position präzisiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77788966
Omegatherion (2019-11-30 10:56:02+00:00): warum sollte das access-tag ungültig sein? und warum löscht du das einfach anstatt es durch ein korrektes zu ersetzen?
PT-53 (2019-11-30 11:52:32+00:00): Hallo Omegatherion,
statt access=bicycle;psv;foot wären bicycle=yes, psv=yes und foot=yes die korrekten Access-Merkmale:
Auszug aus Key:access:
Zur Angabe eines Verkehrsmittels wird der Schlüssel access=* durch Gruppenschlüssel (z.B. vehicle=* für alle Fahrzeuge) oder Einzelschlüssel (z.B. bicycle=* für Fahrräder) ersetzt.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
Außerdem gelten bei einer tertiary gem. den Default-Access-Restriction diese Nutzungsbrechtigungen als impliziert und brauchen und sollen daher gar nicht expliziet angegeben werden. Das gleiche gilt für motor_vehicle=yes das Du ja selbst im Sept. 2018 gelöscht hast.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany
Grüße
abrensch (2019-11-30 12:29:59+00:00): Hatte ich an https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76870509 (den Du nicht beantwortet hast) ausführlich geschrieben
Omegatherion (2019-12-08 10:44:20+00:00): Entschuldigung, die Nachfrage in dem CS habe ich übersehen. Antwort dort.
BCNorwich (2019-12-01 08:09:05+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Google Maps cannot legally be used as a source for adding data to the OpenStreetMap database. Therefore, (to avoid any confusion),  it is best not to mention the name at all.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-11-30 07:43:35+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The area you changed is made up of individual private gardens. So I've reverted your changes from publicly accessible park back to private garden. Of course if you can show the area has been formally changed to a public park then I apologise and will accept your finding.

Regards Bernard.
literan (2019-12-01 21:36:41+00:00): не надо ОРАТЬ. Капс убран.
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-03-02 00:18:48+00:00): Отличная работа! Небольшое замечание: мелиорационные канавы следует отмечать как waterway=ditch (не stream), и желательно отрисовывать связанный граф: если канава имеет крытый участок (труба под дорогой), то отмечается это участок как tunnel=culvert + layer=-1. При отрисовке разорванный участков JOSM выдает сообщение об ошибке (наличие изолированного waterway)
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-03-02 00:23:09+00:00): P.s. направление waterway тоже имеет значение -- желательно направлять их по течению
mavl (2019-11-30 11:20:31+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы продолжаете делать ошибки. Прочитайте, пожалуйста:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-18 00:03:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7020739683/history

Have you meant something like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dwaste_disposal ?
Sammyhawkrad (2021-01-18 00:46:13+00:00): No I didn't mean that. If you check the area, you can see that different waste tags have been used with each meeting the tagging convention. amenity=waste_dump_site here is used for unauthorised and indiscriminate waste disposal points.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-18 00:54:51+00:00): Maybe landuse=landfill + informal=yes would fit in such case? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dlandfill "Unofficial dumping grounds"
Sammyhawkrad (2021-01-18 01:12:27+00:00): It isn't a landfill site so it cannot be tagged as such.  amenity=waste_disposal, amenity=waste_basket, amenity=recycling have all been used here but in this instance none of them fits. This is a local tag to meet a local need.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-18 08:11:36+00:00): Do you have site of such location? WOuld https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HOUSEHOLD_TRASH_HAS_BEEN_DUMPED_IN_FRONT_OF_THE_NEW_YORK_CITY_INCINERATOR_PLANT_AT_GRAVESEND_BAY_-_NARA_-_547868_-_restored.jpg be a good illustration?

I agree that landuse=landfill + informal=yes is also not ideal.

But naming of amenity=waste_dump_site is also problematic as tag name is not making clear that it is used for illegal locations.

I created https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_dump_site to document this tag.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-18 08:12:13+00:00): Argh, it was supposed to be:

Do you have photo of such location? Would https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HOUSEHOLD_TRASH_HAS_BEEN_DUMPED_IN_FRONT_OF_THE_NEW_YORK_CITY_INCINERATOR_PLANT_AT_GRAVESEND_BAY_-_NARA_-_547868_-_restored.jpg be a good illustration?
Sammyhawkrad (2021-01-18 15:53:16+00:00): This is an example of it
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Illegal_Waste_Dump_Site_in_Alogboshie,_Accra.jpg
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-18 22:04:22+00:00): Thanks! I added it to OSM Wiki page documenting this tag.

And I can say that landuse=landfill + informal=yes  was definitely used for such cases.

(though https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like definitely applies here)
BlueG (2019-12-01 10:37:54+00:00): Hallo TZorn!
Ich habe auch schon einige Buslinien nach dem Fahrplanwechsel angepasst und um den Überblick zu halten eine Tabelle im Wiki angelegt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Leverkusen#Busse 
Es wäre super, wenn du die von dir "abgearbeiten" Linien auch dort vermerkst.
Viele Grüße, BlueG.
eggie (2019-11-30 07:26:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Bednks voo je bijdrage. Probeer in het vervolg op de juiste adresnode bij te taggen.
Verder niet name:nl= gebruiken.. alleen name=

MVG,
Eggie
Linus Wolf (2020-01-31 23:07:16+00:00): Pourquoi as-tu supprimé mon (ou mes) tags « geonames:id » ?
Why did you delete my tag (or tags) “geonames:id”?
eggie (2019-11-30 07:28:36+00:00): Svp bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Niet zelf adressen aanmaken op woningen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-30 07:35:52+00:00): Bibliotheek de Meierij bestaat per 25 juni 2017 niet meer. Het bibliotheekwerk in Schijndel, Sint-Oedenrode, Boxtel, Vught en Sint-Michielsgestel is overgenomen door de Noord Oost Brabantse Bibliotheken (NOBB) en Bibliotheek 's-Hertogenbosch e.o. 
Svp niet op de gebouwen zelf taggen, maar op de juiste adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-30 07:39:30+00:00): Info bieb verwijderd. Deze is al aanweig elders. Duplkaatadres verwijderd van woning.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
aharvey (2019-11-30 02:12:49+00:00): Just bear in mind that the name alone doesn't determine the classification. You could have something named river which is still tagged as a stream in OSM due to it being smaller with less flow than you'd expect from a river.
Warin61 (2019-12-03 09:30:29+00:00): Reverted. 
This is the very beginning of this river ... The Murry River starts as a spring out of the ground.. 

They only get to be OSM 'rivers' when they have much more width. The usual OSM difference is a 'river' cannot be jumped over, a stream can.
Kautilya3 (2019-11-30 17:53:42+00:00): I changed this to "headwater" rather than the main Tinkar Khola as per this map:
http://ai.stanford.edu/~latombe/mountain/photo/nepal-2016/nepal-2016.htm
But it is not yet updated correctly. Experts, please help!
maxolasersquad (2019-12-05 19:19:48+00:00): Please provide more meaningful comments in your changesets. For example, "Added Saint George Plantation Clubhouse."

Thanks for contributing.
goedegazelle (2019-11-30 12:33:31+00:00): Dit is een natuurgebied, landuse=forest lijkt me verkeerd.
padvinder (2019-12-02 12:28:52+00:00): waarom?
goedegazelle (2019-12-03 11:20:15+00:00): Natuurgebied, natural?
padvinder (2019-12-04 15:04:35+00:00): ja dat is een oude discussie. kijk forum er nog eens op na. Het is een definitiekwestie. In het verleden probeerde ik in nederlang ook onderscheid te maken tussen 'wood' en 'forest'. maar in ons dichtbevolkte land blijkt de conventie onder mappers dat alle bos 'forest' is, want op de een of andere manier door de mens gecontroleerd of gepland. 'Wood' is bestemd voor maagdelijk  'oerbos' en dat hebben we niet.
Glassman (2019-11-30 03:27:01+00:00): Tip: rather than delete similar features, just fix the tags and geometry on the existing features - which will keep the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77746738
blackhawkdriver (2019-11-30 03:34:01+00:00): Ok. I'm new to this. Just trying to do my part, but it seems to work regardless of how I went about fixing it. If I don't click 'require someone to review my edits', does someone still review it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77746738
blackhawkdriver (2019-11-30 03:35:43+00:00): I'm actually in Texas, but plan to move to Vancouver in the near future. Was just checking out the area before moving there. Nobody seems to care about the maps in Texas...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77746738
Glassman (2019-11-30 06:24:56+00:00): Actually very few people check most new edits. I watch new edits in Washington State and all edits in my area, just north of Seattle. I like welcoming new mappers and hope to they are encourage to get more involved with OSM. OSMCha is a tool a number of organizations and companies use to watch critical issues like vandalism, game playing, non typical edits, etc. 

Washington State does have a one of the largest OSM communities in the country. Not only volunteers, but paid mappers as well. TriMet, the Portland transit agency, is also an active OSM editor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77746738
maraf24 (2019-12-07 17:53:43+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=771165#p771165
user_535043 (2020-03-25 18:05:37+00:00): Hi:
I have noticed that road A41 of Gila, AZ, which is an important way to Mt.Ord, was deleted in one of your edits. I've just recovered it. Would you please let me know if you have some reason to delete it? Thanks!
phidauex (2020-03-25 18:56:53+00:00): Hi Daungg, I'm not the original editor, but A41 is a TIGER road classification, not the name. The US has a lot of these old imported roads, and many aren't at all accurate so they get regularly deleted or changed, and we tend to trust local mapper's judgement in this regard.

In this case, that way is definitely not a residential road - track at best - and it may not even be passable anymore. Be cautious when restoring TIGER imported roads - they may have been removed for a good reason.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/77746831
user_535043 (2020-03-26 01:21:57+00:00): Hi phidauex, you are right they are not residential, and the road name should be FR 27 according to local map. As a local I know it is passable, and it's an important hiking-biking-4WD trail to Mt. Ord. I have modified those highway tags. Thank you!
phidauex (2020-03-26 01:35:01+00:00): Thanks, I wasn’t sure if you were local since most of your change sets were elsewhere in the world. If you can confirm the road types and tag them correctly, that is ideal. Thanks!
maraf24 (2019-12-25 12:54:54+00:00): To nie jest opis. To jest historia.
Przywróciłem właściwy opis.
Proszę, zaprzestań tych wandlizmów.
maraf24 (2019-12-25 13:10:30+00:00): To teza. Teraz ją udowodnij.
nevw (2019-11-30 02:58:54+00:00): Hi
you appear to have duplicated the business edit for the cidery. Can you retain the one that is located over the cidery building and delete the other.
Mapping the access road, buildings, parking areas would be helpful too.
nevw (2019-12-19 06:59:27+00:00): no response, deleted duplicate.
maraf24 (2019-12-25 12:50:31+00:00): Nie jest to prawda i po raz ostatni proszę o zaprzestanie kasowania po uważaniu nazw z POI.
user_5359 (2019-11-30 06:13:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.. Don’t use landuse=grass
Arun Madhavan (2019-11-30 02:41:36+00:00): IT is a MDR can some one tag it properly ?
Dynamikum (2019-11-30 07:50:46+00:00): Guten Morgen,

dein Beitrag wurde verändert. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77751038

1. Du suchst Personal und betreibst Werbung für "Deine" Firma, OSM ist als öffentliche Plattform keine Plattform dafür.

2. Erst löschst du einen korrekten Knoten und legst einen neuen an. Falls nötig verändert man einen bestehenden Knoten und löscht nicht.

Gruß
DannyMcD (2019-12-17 17:08:13+00:00): Thanks for doing this. The disconnected primary roads were weird.
Frans S (2019-12-18 15:40:45+00:00): Hello Andrea, Thanks for mapping here.
A request. please pay more attention on accurate mapping and squaring of the buildings you map with the Q key in iD editor. Also do not let nodes of nearby buildings connect to each other
Please check the issue triangle on the right hand menu and solve the issues.
best regards and keep mapping
mueschel (2019-12-01 10:16:37+00:00): Hi,
the tag for an escalator is 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:conveying

Cheers
Jan
4004 (2019-12-04 15:28:20+00:00): indeed, thanks
Minh Nguyen (2020-01-06 08:16:12+00:00): What’s the reason for moving Amtrak to the front of the list? Is there a convention that the national service should be listed first? Previously, Caltrain had been listed first at the two stations it shares with Amtrak. Signs at these stations and roads leading to them always place Caltrain first, with Amtrak sometimes coming last:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Santa_Clara_Transit_Center_Brokaw_Road_pillar.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:San_José_Diridon_0943_03.JPG
https://openstreetcam.org/details/1256063/559
clay_c (2020-01-07 00:00:11+00:00): I primarily wanted things to be uniform across stations shared by Amtrak and a local operator. I observed that most cases across the country listed Amtrak first, while Caltrain and FrontRunner had it the other way around.

Suburban trains nearly always show up more often than Amtrak regardless of location, so I could see the case for putting Amtrak last. Though at the time, I considered this to be mostly inconsequential, since order doesn't matter in the network tag.

-Clay
aharvey (2019-11-30 08:07:16+00:00): What's the intent here? The wood is on the ground level so shouldn't have a layer tag. Things like bridges need the layer tag to know what's above each other.
Warin61 (2019-12-02 06:21:15+00:00): Hi,
For the historic 'post office". Have you made a new entry for the new post office? 
If not .. then I'd move this node 2231717596 to the new location. 
If you have made a new entry then change this node! No longer operated by Oz post etc, so delete these tags. Possible tags historic=building description=old post office??
freeExec (2020-06-05 14:36:29+00:00): Вы удаляете корректные теги public_transport=station с жд вокзалов, это вандализм
user_5359 (2019-11-30 18:52:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description as standard keys, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
InfosReseaux (2019-12-26 14:23:28+00:00): Hi

I found a line_attachment=transposing on #348077201
This is not currently a reviewed value.

line_management=transpose is currently under RFC on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Lines_management

Are you sure it's a transposition and not a branch?

Best regards
François
theophrastos (2019-12-26 20:04:02+00:00): Hi,

as the original edit happened some time ago, I am not sure. I will check the situation, might take a few days

Regards
Klaus
InfosReseaux (2019-12-27 23:05:53+00:00): Sounds good Klaus, we're not in a hurry.

Thank you if you have time to check that
All the best
François
theophrastos (2020-01-01 16:21:59+00:00): Hi,
you were right, its not a transposition, its a split, corrected
Regards
Klaus