piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Pedja (2021-07-12 16:06:47+00:00): Kada upisuješ verske objekte nije dovoljno upisati samo religion=christian. 

Treba upisati i denomination. Na primer za srpske pravoslavne objekte se upisuje denomination=serbian_orthodox.
DressyPear4 (2021-07-12 18:36:35+00:00): Olá, evite grudar essas áreas de praças nas vias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107850806
Tomas09 (2025-11-24 21:57:51+00:00): What for was this very large residential area?
wohnung058 (2025-11-25 11:28:25+00:00): The residential area shows the outer lines of buildings and other objects that were considered part of the City as visible on the satellite Image at the time. Basically it shows the city limits. You can compare it with the City of Maxixe. Here you see buildings with a none defined usage of land. If you want to change areas of landuse you either ad inner Multipolygons for the area or you have to split it into thousands of pieces.
Tomas09 (2025-11-25 14:27:22+00:00): then why was it reaching far into the sea?
cserpell (2021-07-12 17:19:16+00:00): Hola! No entiendo este cambio que hiciste, ya que marcaste los nodos de la acera con puertas, afectando no solo a la calle Cristina Klenner, sino también a quienes se mueven por las aceras. Creo que esto no es correcto, ya que solo debería afectar a quienes entran por dicha calle y no a quienes van por la acera.
MundoMaps (2021-07-14 16:09:20+00:00): ¡Hola cserpell! Gracias por contactarme. Mencionas un buen punto. Ya marqué los nodos en la calle Cristina Klenner para no afectar la red peatonal. ¡Gracias!
cserpell (2021-07-15 01:06:56+00:00): Gracias a ti, la idea es que entre todos mejoremos el mapa!
mvexel (2022-10-04 14:45:14+00:00): Nice!
parukhin (2021-09-25 17:56:03+00:00): Коллега, здравствуйте.
Не стоит дублировать на зданиях теги POI которые в них находятся, как например здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204544704/history
И проставляя на здании тег amenity/shop/man_made убирать тег building, они после этого зданиями не перестают быть.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100165666/history
У ТП 1004 - её номер, а не напряжение, напряжение в voltage https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5079667786/history
gbragaalves (2021-07-12 22:42:20+00:00): Hello,

I was doing some editing in this area and I realized you changed the name of the Avenida Glaucio Gil. I would like to know your source for this new value.

Thank you.
birdymaps (2021-07-13 14:46:33+00:00): Hello gbragaalves, thank you for your comment. I made the decision to expand this highway name from “Avenida Glaucio Gil” to “Avenida Glaucio Cabral Gil” based off of the history at these two ways, which would suggest that “Avenida Glaucio Cabral Gil” would be the most complete form of the name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/783083237#map=19/-23.02270/-43.45807 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261542792. If you have knowledge that this is not correct, please feel free to change back the names. Thank you again for your message!
gbragaalves (2021-07-13 17:14:57+00:00): Thank you for your reply. I guess the former value was incorrect so I just updated the name in order to make it as it's determined by law. 

Best wishes.
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-24 23:52:05+00:00): Hello and thank you for your efforts
At Lashkar Crossroads
The junction must be connected to a line, so it was connected to one of the nodes.
pán Petrík (2023-11-26 19:39:59+00:00): cau, Gabriel. Na tej vyhliadke som bol v oktobri 2023 a cesticka k nej bola zaorana a ziadny vyhlad z toho miesta nebol, je to len trochu vyvysene miesto na poli. Vymazal by som tu vyhliadku, je tam zbytocne, len som ti najprv chcel napisat dovod.
pán Petrík (2023-11-26 19:44:01+00:00): myslim tu vyhliadku cca 600 m od vlakovej stanice Orechova Poton.
Gabriel Cséfalvay (2023-11-27 12:51:37+00:00): Jasne, v tom prípade to vymaž, aby to bolo aktuálne.
ralley (2021-07-13 06:32:52+00:00): You've put a Cafe name on the moving walkway  object, instead you should create a new node tagged amenity=cafe and name=Pier Cafe
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107853530
user_3022894 (2021-07-12 19:35:53+00:00): Hi Helge,
alles klar, danke für die Info! :-)

Wäre das okay, wenn du dann von dem bearbeiteten Abschnitt noch die Tags maxspeed=30 und maxspeed:type=DE:zone30 entfernst? Die beiden würden dann nämlich entfallen (und müssten halt auch weg), da in einem VB ja Schrittgeschwindigkeit gilt.

Viele Grüße,
Lukas
user_18305684 (2023-06-28 22:49:03+00:00): Hi,

for the nodes 8914467599 and  8914457766 (and 10201875355 in another changeset), what is the meaning of "natural=pot" ?

Best regards
fatuus (2023-06-29 05:00:50+00:00): Hi
I forgot to change this, maybe it should be:
geological=giants_kettle
user_18305684 (2023-07-01 21:21:45+00:00): In fact, geologically speaking, there are several things possible, all in osm database so you (or someone else) need to know what it is to put the good value : 
kettle = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kettle_(landform)
giants_kettle = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant%27s_kettle
panhole = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panhole
user_18305684 (2023-07-01 21:40:29+00:00): I forgot, it also could be natural=sinkhole with different values for sinkhole, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sinkhole
1993matias (2025-01-01 16:48:52+00:00): Hello, 
Quick question: With this changeset you added some service platforms in the yard area of Odense station. Service platforms are not mapped anywhere else in Denmark, so I am wondering whether it is necessary to keep them in Odense or not. Do you have any opinion? 
I am myself leaning towards deleting them since they have nothing to do with public facing areas and the usage of public transport - the tag implies they do. 
-Matias
micha_k (2025-01-01 18:12:45+00:00): Hi Matias,
the public_transport tags were later added by another user (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/156454274) - these are wrong. I agree with you, that these should be removed. I'd keep the railway=platform tags? I don't know, what other tags could be used for these distinctive objects.
Micha
1993matias (2025-01-01 20:32:44+00:00): Hi Micha, 
Thanks for your input. I will remove the public_transport tag and otherwise leave them untouched. 
As for better tags for that object I don't know either. 
-Matias
ivanbranco (2021-07-13 15:29:20+00:00): Ciao Davide, i nomi di alcune delle way che hai modificato erano giusti prima come da convenzione della community italiana: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198099941/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677857786/history

Vedi Wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade
Tom Brennan (2023-02-26 22:02:24+00:00): Just wanted to check if any of the new ways created in this changeset have been ground-truthed. From my knowledge of the general area, none of these would have actual tracks on the ground, and so should probably be removed unless there's ground evidence to the contrary.
kempelen (2021-07-12 18:49:28+00:00): Szia! name=Horgászbolt-on mi nem jó? Ha ez van rá kiírva óriási betűkkel, akkor ez a neve, nem?
kogutowicz-mano (2021-07-12 19:24:41+00:00): Ez nem olyan egyértelmű.
Ez az üzlet fajtája, a kategóriája. Nem egyedi azonosítója. Ez egy névtelen horgászbolt. Minden tizennegyedik üzlet névtelen, csak annyi van ráírva, hogy fodrász, húsbolt, könyvesbolt, cipőbolt, újságos, kozmetika.
Ámde név az, ami megkülönbözteti egymástól a fodrászokat, henteseket, stb.
És erre van kifejezett szabáĺy, hogy az ilyet nem vesszúk fel a name=* mezőbe.

Itt kicsi a hely. Ha akarod, folytassuk holnap személyes üzenetekben.
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 21:58:47+00:00): Ciao ross-map,

c'è un problema col place value di questo nodo, puoi dargli un'occhiata?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8895612453
hatul (2024-07-18 15:28:18+00:00): בבקשה לא להעתיק מוויקיפדיה. הרישיון שלה ושל osm לא תואמים.
Dawid2849 (2021-07-12 21:39:21+00:00): Proszę, nie rysuj takich bzdur, OSM to nie jest zabawka, z tego projektu korzystają między innymi służby ratunkowe... Jeżeli chcesz rysować jakieś fikcyjne drogi to polecam OpenGeofiction.
AndyB_66 (2021-07-13 06:03:07+00:00): To już kolejne wybryki tego wandala (poprzednio działał jako user "rifoxedek" i "ogr00") - dostał blokady, ale widzę, że hydra znów podnosi głowę. I tym razem został zgłoszony do adminów, więc jego żywot, mam nadzieję, długi nie będzie.
dcapillae (2021-07-12 19:58:58+00:00): Buenas tardes,  Claucambra. Gracias por mejorar el mapa.

Por favor, no añada etiquetas de dirección duplicadas. Las direcciones (nombres de calles, números de portal y códigos postales) se encuentran en los nodos de entrada de los edificios o en las verjas de entrada de las propiedades. No es necesario añadirlas en los contornos de los edificios si ya se encuentran en el mapa. Por favor, asegúrese de no añadirlas por duplicado.

El resto de cambios están muy bien, Buen trabajo.

Gracias por su colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel
Niiepce (2022-01-04 18:52:37+00:00): Diese Bearbeitung war leider teilweise falsch. Ich habe sie verbessert.
Niiepce (2021-07-13 14:38:48+00:00): Danke für die Änderungen. Zwei davon waren leider falsch. Ich habe sie korrigiert.
dhimmel (2021-08-20 13:50:41+00:00): I added alt_name=Harris Trial to Plumber Hill Road in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109989815. If I remember from my recent visit there, there wasn't any signage for "Plumber Hill Road", just signs for "Harris Trail", so perhaps "Harris Trail" should be the primary name for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963743937?

I had read that the first part of the track road here was Plumber Hill Road, but I didn't know where this historical road ended! Thanks for figuring that out.
dhimmel (2021-08-20 13:52:27+00:00): Also large parts of Old Tote Road are singletrack at this point, so though decision whether to consider it a track or path.
A Hall (2021-08-20 14:07:32+00:00): I'll revert to whatever you think is best. If it's only signed as Harris Trail, I'd put that as the primary and move Plumber Hill to alt_name. Pretty sure I got this info from UVLT documentation. They have to do surveys any time they make acquisitions, so I trusted them.

If it's only single track, I think it's safe to turn to a path. OSM should match on the ground, right?
dhimmel (2021-08-20 14:36:45+00:00): Cool thanks for getting back to me. I made the changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109992036#map=16/43.7436/-72.1481

If useful, there are some photos of this area on my related Strava activity https://www.strava.com/activities/5492139286
A Hall (2021-08-20 15:03:56+00:00): I hope you tagged that rock appropriately https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Drock
dhimmel (2021-08-20 15:21:31+00:00): Haha. I think I did, but sadly it doesn't show up on the default rendering. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8847049892

I assumed it wasn't attached to the bedrock, so I labeled it natural=stone. But honestly I have no idea! The Hanover Trails Challenge did call it a "glacial erratic".
A Hall (2021-08-20 15:24:40+00:00): Awesome. You are doing good work. Keep it up!
Niiepce (2022-01-04 16:12:17+00:00): Diese Bearbeitung war leider falsch. Ich habe sie verbessert.
arukuni (2021-07-15 06:55:41+00:00): `leisure=water_park` raczej oznacza aquapark.
Do wodnego placu zabaw bardziej pasuje 
leisure=playground
playground=splash_pad
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Urbeach-high-park-splashpad.jpg)
Nazwę ulicy też proponuję usunąć - to nie jest oficjalny adres, więc może być mylące
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107858701
François Guerraz (2021-09-19 08:12:11+00:00): Bonjour,

Sur quelles bases avez-vous décidé de supprimer ces liaisons maritimes?

Hello,

On what basis did you decide to delete these ferry routes?
eteb3 (2022-07-16 07:15:00+00:00): Hi Russ

Re the footpath re-tagged UCR, just checking it's correct to say that there is no bicycle access? Usually there's a right of way for all vehicles, even if practically it's impassable for motors. (But usually a mountainbike or 4x4 could cope.)

It seems you may have been there on the ground, if it was your GPS track that you referenced in your sources. Do you remember any signs prohibiting all but walkers? 

Thanks,
Russ McD (2022-07-16 07:43:26+00:00): Agreed with the rationale, that bicycles and walkers shud be ok on UCRs.  I'm travelling now  but will take a look when back on PC. 
It's possible the tag was already on there, as it's not a tag I wud normally add myself.  Cheers.
Russ McD (2022-07-17 17:52:41+00:00): I remember this lane (assuming its the one in the changeset you are referring to) - heading W>E after the ford, it does turn into a rough climb.  
The no bicycle tag was put in by a previous mapper, and I would argue is wrong.  I also note that as I changed the highway tag to track, it would mean a 4x4 vehicle could drive it.  I note that another mapper has changed to path, so I have to assume its now no longer physically accessible by 4x4 - I will check next time I'm down that way and revert to track if the 4x4 gang still use it.
eteb3 (2022-07-17 21:24:08+00:00): Thanks. The prompt for this discussion was me looking at notes and wondering which I can close. 

This one
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2562233
would suggest the way you refer to was once suggesting a route for drivers (Amazon, I guess, or MapBox generally). 

I wonder if all the edits have actually dealt with that 'problem' (if problem it is: I rather think the routing software needs to be cleverer than just assume any UCR is a good route - this comes up again and again)
lenochod (2024-10-08 07:31:06+00:00): Ahoj Adame.

Prosím tě, proč jsi přidával adresu na budovu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76434370 když už existuje jako bod https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1434677501 ??

S díky za info
Lukáš
Viki_travel_weak (2021-07-13 04:18:24+00:00): Other legal sources for editing used in the josm based sources: 'Strava cycling and running heatmap', 'TIGER Roads 2020', 'U.S. Forest Roads Overlay', 'osm imagery based'.
Tatfahren (2025-07-17 15:49:59+00:00): Hallo Pfefferdose,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963761703 wurde bei einem Firmenneubau verschoben, da ich aber das lokale pipelinenetz nicht kenne, und im Luftbild 3 Stationen erkennbar sind, wollte ich fragen ob du dort vielleicht die Position aktualisieren kannst. Das Luftbild ist mir dazu ohne Ortskenntnis zu unscharf.
Famlam (2021-07-12 20:26:55+00:00): Source is onjuist! (Vorige changeset)

Correct is: PDOK Luchtfoto - 2021_quick_orthoHR; BGT omtrekgericht
eggie (2021-07-12 21:27:57+00:00): Dag cj
warnings:disconnected_way:highway

Dat achterstraatje Stuiverstr heb ik even verbonden met de rest.
Denk lastig te zien.
maxspeed 30 aangepast naar de wettelijke 15km/u 
MVG
eggie
openstreetmap-se02 (2021-07-12 21:39:30+00:00): Hoi eggie,
Ik vond het al raar ja, ik dacht dat het verbonden was. maxspeed inderdaad gemist.
Bedankt!
osmviborg (2021-07-13 06:59:03+00:00): Ét område og to bygninger. Kunne det ikke have været i ét rettesæt?
LarsBG (2021-07-13 17:38:09+00:00): Jo da. Hvor mange ændringer og hvor stor område skal jeg op på inden jeg uploader? 

Har det en betydning for dig?

Det er bare svært når en anden mapper siger jeg har lavet 1 felj i et stort rettesæt :-( Så var det nemmere for mig at finde en etv. fejl placeret node.
LarsBG (2021-07-13 17:39:18+00:00): I et mindre rettesæt.
osmviborg (2021-07-13 18:23:20+00:00): Alting med måde. God sommer.
OddlyAngled (2021-07-13 16:10:04+00:00): Duck Pass was already on the map https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/762008590
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107861987
Strubbl (2022-03-29 21:58:20+00:00): Hi, can you please explain to me how can i make use of this calibration point?
Lokalfuerst (2022-07-25 11:07:39+00:00): Hi Strubbl, 
as per my understanding a calibration point is a node with defined settings towards its position like latitude and longitude. If that point is something like a well recognized object, like the roof of a building or a monument, it can be used to recognize offset of images and to adjust them. When i was mapping the area there was considerable offset between different backgrounds so that such a point would be useful. Normally one would physically have to go there and recognize the exact GPS position. However such point is not (yet) available. That is the reason for me putting it there with the request for someone to move it precisely.
Hope this brings some light to your question.
Sorry for being late in reply.
Best regards
Lokalfuerst
Strubbl (2022-08-01 19:30:23+00:00): Hi, does it make sense to add some more tags to this node, e.g. like the ones mentioned in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point ?
julianofhernandez (2021-08-06 02:03:22+00:00): The dog park needs to be extended east to fill up to the bike path.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
InfosReseaux (2021-08-04 13:17:06+00:00): Bonjour,

Dans ces quelques modifications, deux noeuds portent substation=converter, habituellement réservé à des installations très particulières permettant l'échange d'électricité entre pays à courant continu.

substation=minor_distribution me semble plus adapté à la commune de Thory.
Nous avons régulièrement ces confusions. Est-ce que iD le propose de manière trop prononcée ?
Si la doc peut être améliorée je le ferai rapidement.

Merci par avance du retour
Le_Cartographe (2021-08-04 14:26:51+00:00): Bonjour,

Oui je viens de remarquer les deux nœuds (postes de transformation) et je suis d'accord sur le changement.
J'avais dû mettre cet attribut croyant que c'était celui qui conviendrait le mieux (Transformation ressemblant à "converter")

Je vais modifier cette erreur dans ma prochaîne modification, merci pour la remarque !

~Le_Cartographe

P.S. : Pour ce qui est de la confusion, je pense que cela doit être liée à la petite documentation présente lorsqu'on passe le curseur sur l'élément dans les attributs de l'objet, qui peut ne pas être claire pour certains (dont moi :) ), ou qu'un lien est plus prononcé entre transformation et conversion qu'entre transformation et distribution. A voir...
Chivos (2021-07-13 14:05:50+00:00): Bonjour Cartograffe,
Merci pour tes contributions.
D'après le wiki, le ta amenity=community_centre est celui applicable pour une maison des associations. Building=public semble plus dans le cas des tribunaux ou mairie.
ivanbranco (2024-05-04 08:50:44+00:00): Hallo srmac,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8914825627/history

this tree has an incorrect value, do you know the real one?

thanks and good mapping :)
AndyB_66 (2021-07-13 08:19:18+00:00): To już kolejne wybryki tego wandala (poprzednio działał jako user "rifoxedek" i "ogr00") - dostał blokady, ale widzę, że hydra znów podnosi głowę. I tym razem został zgłoszony do adminów, więc jego żywot, mam nadzieję, długi nie będzie.
ivanbranco (2021-08-17 20:26:43+00:00): Hi Arlo,

what do you mean with lizard=yes?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963775765
Arlo James Barnes (2021-08-18 12:47:17+00:00): There's art of a lizard painted (or otherwise marked, I only have aerials to go off) on the pavement there. I didn't know what tagging to use so I just went with area=yes at first, but iD complained so I added the other tag. Alternately, it's a defacto access tag indicating that lizards might be found there from time to time. Feel free to change it.
ivanbranco (2021-08-18 16:20:51+00:00): I changed it in a generic tourism=artwork. Anyway I suggest you to take a look on the wiki to find the proper tags to use.
tekim (2021-07-12 23:30:26+00:00): Hello again,  I realize that this was an existing error, but the name tag should only be used for the actual name of a feature, not for additional information, such as "dismount."

Also, you still need to cite your source(s), as whether bicyclists have to dismount or not cannot be determined by looking at Bing Imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107864253
Li-H (2021-09-08 22:40:07+00:00): Добрый день. Для чего Вы удалили мою правку? Там проезда для автомобиля нет. В этом месте лестница и тропа, как я указал. Только уровни доступа мне нужно было бы скорректировать. В остальном было всё верно.
Может быть стоит вернуть мою правку назад?
Good day. Why did you delete my edit? There is no way for a car. At this point there is a staircase and a path, as I indicated. Only the access levels would need to be adjusted. The rest was all right.
Maybe you should revert my revision back?
MaddMapper (2021-09-10 22:01:13+00:00): Hello Li-H,
Thanks for reaching out to me with these concerns!
I noticed when working in this area that the edits from (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107864321) created overlapping ways with the unclassified road in this location (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429057009). I removed the steps based on Maxar Standard Imagery, which from my first look I thought the road continued south to the houses around (50.99925535,34.850970950000004) but it seems you may have some more local knowledge or some other resource to prove the steps and path exist here. I discovered this overlap from a validation warning and with no evidence of the steps and path I removed them. Would you recommend that I revert my edit and also make changes to (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429057009) so that the highway connection does not go all the way through?
Thanks,
MaddMapper
Li-H (2021-09-11 19:50:10+00:00): Hello, MaddMapper.
Thank you for your attentiveness and responsiveness :)
(I hope I translated these words correctly :))
Yes, I have precisely the knowledge of the area, obtained with my own eyes, and I know that there is a break in the car path, and there is a staircase and part of a walking trail.
I think it's best to undo this edit and leave the terrain as I displayed earlier.
P.S. Quite often I come across the fact that the real terrain differs from satellite images.
Thanks, regards, Li-H.
-----
Здравствуйте, MaddMapper.
Спасибо Вам за внимательность и отзывчивость :)
Да, у меня есть именно знание местности, полученное воочию, и знаю, что там разрывается автомобильный путь, и присутствует лестница и часть пешеходной тропы.
Я думаю, что лучше отменить эту правку и оставить местность так, как я отобразил ранее.
П.С. Достаточно часто сталкиваюсь с тем, что реальная местность отличается от изображений спутника.
Спасибо, с уважением, Li-H.
Li-H (2021-09-11 20:05:14+00:00): My access was really not very correct, I will correct it later.
I saw that I made a general access restriction superfluous.
"Access=no" i will clean.
Probably because of this, validator showed an error.
-----
Доступ у меня действительно проставлен был не очень верно, позже я его откорректирую.
Я увидел, что лишним сделал общее ограничение доступа.
"Access=no" я уберу.
Наверное из-за этого валидатор и показывал ошибку.
MaddMapper (2021-09-14 01:00:45+00:00): Hi Li-H,

I see you made the edit. Thank you very much!

-MaddMapper
eggie (2021-07-13 05:52:40+00:00): Hoi
De kronkel in het nieuwe stukje heb ik mbv de BGT omtrekgericht toegevoegd. De aansluiting bij het kruispunt loopt nog iets anders nu, maar dan zal eerst de relatie moeten worden aangepast voordat je dat kunt aanpassen. 
De routerelatie is hier nog wel stuk. Een eindje verder ook. Dat heb ik net gerepareerd.  Eigenlijk kun je geen routerelaties bewerken met editor iD
Zal eens kijken of het simpel is aan te passen. Vreemd dat de snelfietsroute een G11 fietspad is. Daar mogen dan geen speedbikes overheen. 
Zie hier de tagging voor fietspaden.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

MVG
eggie