piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2016-08-23 17:26:35+00:00): The fact that someone changes something in the wiki does NOT give you carte blanche to apply that change worldwide.  There are a couple of reasons for this; one is that we want to give data consumers some warning of impending changes and the other is that if you do what is essentially a mechanical edit (you've said yourself 'I have to trust the peer that entered this data and if he/she categorized it as a "village"') you'll get edge cases wrong.  If the only thing you're looking at is the previous tag then you _are_ just doing a mechanical edit and should be following http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .  That doesn't mean that the edit won't happen - recently in the UK someone changed bridge_name to bridge:name, but discussed it beforehand and there was no real objection.
staytuned (2016-08-23 20:29:01+00:00): If you think this is a problem, then revert the edit yourself and start a tiresome discussion on the mailing list.  I won't be in the way of that.

I'm well aware of the "Automated edits code of conduct".  But I have a very different view of whether it applies to the edit in question here.  For one thing, I have not 'replaced' prior tags and for another thing, there is NO, I repeat NO, difference in semantic interpretation of "abandoned=village" and "abandoned:place=village".

As is consented upon in the wiki (for a _long_ time, by _many_ - it's not just a spurious edit, as you put it), the latter is a successor of the former.  However, I agree with you in the point, that a single edit in the wiki does not grant "carte blanche" as you put it, to change data.  

You're right, that this changeset will not 'rectify' wrong data - we've already discussed that, this was not a primary goal.  But do you think, that not touching it (at all, regardless of reason), will leave a better chance of it being reviewed?  After all, it has gotten very little attention now, as a by-product of your dissatisfaction with the changeset.
staytuned (2016-08-23 20:46:21+00:00): Also, you only quote the parts that fit your argument, this is selective and not objective.  I've checked a large amount of those places, if not all, to an extent larger than "just looking at the former tag".  The former tag solely served as an information at which data to look at all.

But with abandonded features, aerial data and some web queries are often not enough, this is why I've rightfully written that you need to trust data classification of editors work lying past that of your own.

And if you have not recognized that this is a pattern to repeat in every kind of work, you should reconsider some of the fundamentals you base your arguments on:  There is a lot of trust involved to make OSM happen. Not just on the pure mapping / tagging side.  Of course, this is not to say, that it happens blindly.
aseerel4c26 (2016-08-26 21:56:43+00:00): @staytuned: 

"You will have to ask person, who originally entered and categorized this." and "But this is something YOU are trying to do" -- you should do this instead of adding another likely wrong tag, since, indeed, I think "not touching it (at all, regardless of reason), will leave a better chance of it being reviewed". 

By the way: there still was not given a clear description of what this mass edit exactly did. I would expect at least something like: <Via overpass I downloaded all (worldwide) objects which have the key abandoned=village and I added abandoned:place=village to all of them (keeping the old tag too). I did not check the correctness of the old tag>. This is a basic requirement and quite easy to fulfil. This way others, who view the edited objects, would know that you did not check the applicability of the old tag, but just added another one based on the old one. 

Updating/changing tags via a mass edit may be the right thing to do in some cases. However, please discuss it (and how it is exactly done) with the community. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct are there for a reason.
MMN-o (2016-06-25 16:45:04+00:00): public_transport, not public_platform :P
Dakon (2016-09-19 07:12:02+00:00): Danke, deine Vereinheitlichung hat dazu geführt, dass jetzt die meisten Nebengleise in der OpenRailwayMap nicht mehr gerendert werden, da du die ungültige Kombination von usage und service verwendet hast. Bevor du die Kategorisierung von Gleisanlagen anfasst lies dir doch bitte das entsprechende Taggingschema durch und installier dir die passenden Validator-Regeln in JOSM. Nein, Potlatch und iD sind für sowas keine gute Idee.
jambamkin (2020-01-24 09:50:48+00:00): Hello fmarier, 
Sorry to try to get you to recall such an old changeset. I was converting cemetery nodes to areas and found your addition here of a pet cemetery on the Ness Islands. I'm reasonably familiar with the area and I can't find reference to this cemetery online. Do you recall anything about it, particularly it's size?
fmarier (2020-01-24 23:25:47+00:00): Sadly not. It's been so long that while I do remember visiting Inverness, I don't remember anything about that pet cemetery.
fmarier (2020-01-24 23:30:13+00:00): Nevermind, I do remember now. Here's a photo of it: https://www.flickr.com/photos/stephaniehobson/3783453579/in/album-72157619611224370/

It was a pretty small thing. Probably half a dozen to a dozen graves.
jambamkin (2020-01-25 12:36:43+00:00): Thanks for digging that image up, I'll probably leave it as a node unless I can find some more suitable tag.
Supaplex (2016-06-27 10:51:42+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse (2016-06-27 16:34:22+00:00): Hello,
You seem to have added a number of duplicates here.  http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264714499 seems to be a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227732833 .  Or are there really two things with the same name very close together?
Cheers,
Andy
WKOSM (2016-09-11 08:37:24+00:00): Hallo 1022124,
warum hast du "Punkt eines Weges wie den Weg getaggt"?
OSMOSE sieht da "E 4090 unnötiges Merkmal auf Knoten"
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=17&lat=47.750415&lon=13.00827&item=4090&level=1&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT


Bitte prüfe ob du der Lösungsempfehlung von OSMOSE folgend alle Merkmale auf den Knoten entfernst. Zudem halte ich eine weitere Einschränkung auf "horse,motor_vehicle" bei einem "amenity" oder gleichzeitigem "access=privat" für unnötig.
maraf24 (2016-06-26 10:56:08+00:00): Nie wygląda to na dworzec autobusowy. a i podany adres jest nieco dalej na południu.
Czy to nie miał być przystanek autobusowy?
maraf24 (2016-07-08 13:47:25+00:00): Usunąłem.
brianboru (2016-07-01 12:39:16+00:00): please elaborate on the damage and then on how you arrived at an intention that is deliberate. I haven't edited here since clearing up after the licence redaction bot
user_5359 (2016-06-27 08:37:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't upload you private list of to visit artworks! And don't add duplicates (like Glückseeligkeit Herberge)
joost schouppe (2017-11-05 16:44:14+00:00): Hi Swift11,
I've added tha clarification that on foot you can in fact use this track. The sign only indicates the track is private property, but since it's a "buurtweg", that doesn't mean you can't use it as a pedestrian.
brianboru (2016-07-01 12:36:56+00:00): never edited here- what are you on about?
brianboru (2016-07-01 12:30:44+00:00): never edited here - what are you on about?
brianboru (2016-07-01 12:31:13+00:00): never edited here - what are you on about?
MKnight (2016-06-30 12:10:16+00:00): was muss man sich unter "linked" vorstellen?
postgelb (2016-06-30 15:32:54+00:00): Den Wert für opening hours habe ich gemäß den Angaben auf der Wiki-Seite (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=compressed_air) übernommen, da die Druckluftstation mit den Öffnungszeiten des Fahrradladens verknüpft ist. Auf den Wiki-Seiten zu opening hours wird der Wert "linked" dagegen nicht aufgeführt.

Die Druckluftstation befinden sich auf der Außenwand vom Fahrradladen und wird außerhalb der Öffnungszeiten abgebaut. Daher ist sie als separater Punkt eingezeichnet und nicht als interne Station zum Laden.

Vermutlich ist es besser die Öffnungszeiten der Station explizit anzugeben, da die Verknüpfung mit dem Fahrradladen nicht sofort ersichtlich ist.
MKnight (2016-06-30 17:47:36+00:00): theoretisch kann man sich das wahrscheinlich irgendwie über die Nähe/gemeinsame Nodes/Ways errechnen, aber da opening_hours kein linked enthält plädiere ich auch für eine Doppelung. Machst Du das?
postgelb (2016-06-30 18:10:48+00:00): Erledigt.
adrianojbr (2016-06-25 19:48:24+00:00): #osmtm-co-project-14 #RioOlympicsMapping
user_5359 (2016-06-26 05:17:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.
Essin (2016-09-02 12:28:01+00:00): I think deleting the geometry was premature. The flat rock-paved stripe is still something that can be seen on the ground. There have also been suggestions that the route should be converted to a bike path, but I don't know what is going to happen with that. See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned
Essin (2016-09-10 12:54:51+00:00): Since there was no reply here, I restored the geometry as railway=abandoned. The railway-specific tags might need a http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix but I don't know enough about common practice for such tags to want to change them myself.

Are there still tracks on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31072839 ?
Comp64 (2016-09-10 20:54:21+00:00): OK, if railway=abandoned is the correct way according to the wiki, there's no dispute.
Are there still tracks? No, there used to be a bridge over the road, but that was removed too.
Essin (2016-10-20 09:21:23+00:00): If the bridge was removed, feel free to delete it (I prefer not to do it since I haven't seen that specific bridge myself). Sorry for not replying earlier, I missed the notification.
Olga | Yanosik (2016-07-06 12:47:21+00:00): Pawle, tag end_date też proszę usuwaj jeśli jest już niepotrzebny :)
Adam_Piszczek (2016-06-25 20:56:33+00:00): i co dalej?
VA00 (2016-06-26 07:07:52+00:00): Dalej nie byłem, więc nie wiem
marczoutendijk (2016-06-26 11:00:57+00:00): Welkom op OSM!
Huisnummers dienen op een adresnode te worden geplaatst. Ik heb het voor je aangepast.
Lees ook de wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
marczoutendijk (2016-06-26 11:03:25+00:00): Opmerking:
Maps.me is niet de beste editor voor het aanpassen van dit soort details. 
Kijk ook eens naar JOSM zoals je in de wiki kunt zien.
Rzezimierz (2016-06-26 15:38:01+00:00): Ej gościu, czemu uprawiasz wandalizm mapowy?
Rzezimierz (2016-06-26 15:38:51+00:00): Jak mogę podać dane do strony jak to jest zwykły pałac, każdy może podjechać, obejrzeć, pogadać z mieszkańcami - teraz sprawiłeś że nie różni się niczym od stojącej obok stodoły. Takie jest Twoje zamierzenie?
maraf24 (2016-06-26 16:55:47+00:00): Ja tam widzę, że dodałem prawidłowe tagi dla pałacu, czego tobie się nie chciało zrobić. Dodatkowo dodałem je do obrysu, a nie do węzła.
Nazwę "Pałac" usunąłem, bo nie nazwa, ale opis. tourism atttraction usunałem, bo nie udowodniłeś, że to atrakcja, poza tym to jest atrybut, a nie tag główny. Główny ja dodałem.
name=* i toursim=attraction to jest przykłąd błędnego tagowania, i to zapewne pod render. Mógłbym to określić wandalizmem mapowym, ale nie jestem pewien, czy zrobiłeś to celowo, czy może naśladując inne, podobnie błędnie otagowane punkty.
maraf24 (2016-06-26 17:08:35+00:00): >teraz sprawiłeś że nie różni się niczym od stojącej obok stodoły

Chyba jednak nie. http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/translate/en/index-en.html?zoom=16&lat=51.09736&lon=16.46124
aharvey (2017-04-03 07:58:38+00:00): Hey there, this track is present. I physically surveyed it. If something exists on the ground then it's fair game to be in OSM. Regardless of if it's dangerous or not. You can read up on two of the tags which I'd already included on this track https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale#Values and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility#Values. Even if access was blocked or discouraged by NPWS it wouldn't warrant deleting the path, instead https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access could be set to no or discouraged.

I've reinstated this deletion, but left the removal of the coast walk name from the section from burning palms to garawarra.
maraf24 (2016-06-26 10:43:42+00:00): Prosiłbym o zamieszczanie bardziej treściwych komentarzy zmian niż "bcvb".
Porada: w edytorze, po narysowaniu budynku, naciśnięcie "S" spowoduje utworzenie kątów prostych.
dieterdreist (2016-06-27 08:55:17+00:00): This added a spanish name for the square to the object that represents the statue for Giordano Bruno. I have fixed it.
R0bst3r (2016-06-28 09:38:01+00:00): Hi dima,

can you have a look again at your import. It uses the meaningful tag "xxx"="yes".

Can you improve this or remove it?

Cheers R0bst3r
dima (2016-06-29 04:38:46+00:00): Hi. Thank you for letting me know. I used these in the import, and left them in by mistake. Fixed. How did you notice this, by the way?
R0bst3r (2016-06-29 13:25:18+00:00): http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm is quiet good to discover typos and new keys.
zarl (2016-08-15 15:09:21+00:00): Hi krl_muc, 

Punkte und Flächen sollten keine Fantasienamen zugewiesen bekommen, das dürfte bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427286675 der Fall sein, oder? Für die genauere Beschreibung echter Biotope siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area und ansonsten kommt noch ein Teich in Frage, dann wäre water=pond korrekt, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dwater

Bitte sei doch so gut und lösche den Namen wieder, und versuche anhand der Dokumentation im Wiki die richtige Beschreibung zu ergänzen.

Danke, und viel Spass weiterhin beim mappen!
Zarl
Commodoortje (2016-06-26 05:51:12+00:00): dubbele AH node samengevoegd.

Gecontroleerd,  diverse aanpassingen/verbeteringen verricht. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.

[one feature one element] (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:One_feature,_one_OSM_element)
Commodoortje (2016-06-26 05:52:59+00:00): Subway was al aanwezig.
Dubbele subway node samengevoegd.

Gecontroleerd,  diverse aanpassingen/verbeteringen verricht. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
[one feature one element] (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:One_feature,_one_OSM_element)
mavl (2019-04-03 16:12:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-03 16:12:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SHARCRASH (2016-08-02 10:46:09+00:00): Please, when you import or make an automated edit, make sure you don't scramble the elements already in place! For example, i had shaped this amphitheatre in half-moon: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6206201 but since your edit, it lost its shape.

Also consider if it's worth to import from a source where the data is mostly used for rendering because having many obsolete nodes on straight lines adds "heavy" data in OSM since its map data is not only used for rendering but also for primary data (think, mobile GPS units using vectors for routing).

Thanks for your comprehension!
sperlingskauz (2016-08-09 13:30:10+00:00): @SHARCRASH: All of my changes are handmade. I moved the amphitheatre in a new position based on my gps data and information of the topo card. Sorry about didn't restoring your excellent half-moon shape.
mavl (2019-04-03 16:12:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
tarta (2016-06-26 14:58:03+00:00): bom dia, rmds, uma dica, não é necessário colar as areas proximo das vias, o colégio salesiano está a 1.6m da via, ele poderia ficar melhor representado se ficasse a uns 6m, ajudaria a nos mantermos um padrão na distancia, pois, dá para representar melhor o local, e não apenas renderizar a área completa.
mavl (2019-04-03 16:12:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
brianboru (2016-07-01 12:30:07+00:00): never edited here- what are you on about?
mavl (2019-04-03 16:12:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
brianboru (2016-07-01 12:29:31+00:00): never edited here- what are you on about?
ElliottPlack (2016-06-29 20:03:59+00:00): Please provide a more descriptive changeset comment. If you're going to be updating road attributes, remove the tiger verified tag to show it has been verified.
ElliottPlack (2016-06-29 20:04:28+00:00): Here's a map of your changeset: http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#40291559
mavl (2019-04-03 16:13:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
muralito (2016-06-26 22:20:57+00:00): Hola. 
Si es reparqacion no es "shop=electronics", seria ·craft=electronics_repair"
y electronics_repair=* con la lista de cosas que se reparen. 
Ver http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/craft%3Delectronics_repair
mavl (2019-04-03 16:12:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
brianboru (2016-07-01 12:29:04+00:00): never edited here - what are you on about?
mavl (2019-04-03 16:13:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
brianboru (2016-07-01 12:28:31+00:00): never edited here - what are you on about?
dvdhoven (2016-10-15 15:40:41+00:00): Ik heb de ingetekende contour aan het Kentgensplein vervangen door een import uit de BAG. 
Ben je het daar niet mee eens, dan kun je mijn changeset reverten.
Het is een single changeset puur voor dit gebouw.
Mijn overweging was ook dat de BAG versie gelijk adresnodes mee neemt, die in de door jou getekende contour missen.
Omdat de contour conflicteert met wegen en paden, heb ik hem een layer=-1 mee gegeven.
Mogelijk kun je een en ander bekijken.
De adresnodes kwamen op een kluitje uit de BAG mee, die heb ik uitgesorteerd. Voel je vrij ze her te verdelen. Ik heb geen idee of het winkels of appartementen of wat dan ook zijn.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Math1985 (2016-10-16 21:01:04+00:00): Dank voor je bericht en de import! BAG lijkt me inderdaad een stuk nauwkeuriger dan ik ook zelf in kan tekenen, dus mijn tekening vervangen door BAG-data lijkt me prima. Die weg door het gebouw moet ik inderdaad nog even verifieren.

Het is me trouwens opgevallen dat er in Zoetermeer hier en daar huizen ontbreken die wel in de BAG staan. Dan is er een rijtje huizen waar er ineens in het midden een ontbreekt. Ik weet niet of er iets mis is gegaan bij onze import of dat er eerder een probleem was met de BAG-data, maar wel raar. Weet jij of dat op de een of andere manier te corrigeren is? Heb jij een manier om te checken welke BAG-gebouwen ontbreken op OSM?
user_5359 (2016-06-26 05:25:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Can you tell me more about the added artworks? I see only normal residential buildings.
Geography Canada (2016-07-06 13:12:25+00:00): Well, at least you didn't delete any roads this time.
Warin61 (2016-10-17 20:59:18+00:00): Relation (361693) is not closed..
nevw (2016-10-18 01:23:43+00:00): Thanks Warin61.
I will fix it in next day or so.
nevw (2016-10-18 11:05:17+00:00): Relation now closed.
Warin61 (2016-10-23 04:25:12+00:00): Goodo.
While adding new stuff is what motivates me, 'housekeeping' makes the map work better. I have a few of my own things to 'fix up' too.
user_5359 (2016-06-26 05:22:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A golf course isn't a tourism attraction (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course). Please add some more details.
Fischkopp0815 (2016-06-26 11:07:30+00:00): Nach deinen Ergänzungen gibt des in der Neuen Anlage 2 Spielplätze

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427319911

und

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1447054364

Gibt es da tatsächlich einen Spielplatz und den Bürgerfitnesspark(der dann ja wohl eher leisure=fitness_station ist) oder ist das eine Dublette und es gibt nur den Bürgerfitnesspark oder den Spielplatz?
Mond00 (2016-06-26 12:14:25+00:00): korrigiert
Supaplex (2016-06-26 06:01:40+00:00): 重覆了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3068512043
dieterdreist (2016-06-27 08:39:30+00:00): this edit places the bar in the middle of the street, please try to locate new objects at their precise position.
mavl (2016-06-26 10:17:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление информации в OpenStreetMap.  
  
Ваши данные попали в проект OpenStreetMap. В OpenStreetMap добавляют данные о фактическом состоянии местности. Вы уверены, что на этом объекте именно так и написано "Стелла ХМАО"?  
  
Во-первых, слово "стела" пишется с одной буквой "л".  
  
Во-вторых, на подобных объектах избегают сокращений. Также сокращений избегают в OpenStreetMap [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия], поэтому рекомендуется указывать названия полностью без сокращений.  
  
В-третьих, вы использовали обозначение historic=monument [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:historic=monument?uselang=ru], которое в данном случае является ошибкой, так как оно используется для очень крупных исторических сооружений.  
  
Здесь более уместно обозначение tourism=information + information=stele + name  [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:tourism%3Dinformation].
Supaplex (2016-06-26 06:00:19+00:00): 名稱都怪怪的?應該有中文名稱吧?
Supaplex (2016-06-27 10:49:26+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
chihchun (2016-06-30 15:30:20+00:00): 此筆修改已經回退。http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40395300
nammala (2016-11-15 03:56:01+00:00): The edits seems to be bad by giving improper names and went ahead reverting the changeset.
GOwin (2016-07-13 00:23:10+00:00): Hello there. Could you provide details of the objects you've been mapping as "artwork"?
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-14 21:00:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40750009 where the changeset comment is: revert tourism=artwork additions of Matthew Landicho after no response was given in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40320950
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-14 21:00:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40750009 where the changeset comment is: revert tourism=artwork additions of Matthew Landicho after no response was given in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40320950
Chetan_Gowda (2016-07-13 08:02:25+00:00): Hi @hg87351, Great to know that you are adding LPU to map. While checking the OSM tags and buildings, I came across few errors in your edits all around LPU campus. 

To trace building levels or more building features, you can go through the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings. Also, many inconsistent tags I've noticed, like farmyard, duplicate building nodes. I'll go ahead clean them. Feel free to comment here. 

Best,
Chetan
AndreasTUHU (2017-12-04 09:59:29+00:00): Szia!
Megkérdezhetem, hogy miért jelöltél meg történelmi kastélynak egy lakóházat?
András
AndreasTUHU (2017-12-07 07:43:38+00:00): Töröltem a kastély címkét.
Hjart (2016-06-26 07:07:31+00:00): What's this?
BCNorwich (2016-06-29 06:32:28+00:00): Hi, you don't show how the long footpath (Way: 174818288) crosses the two streams, are they crossed by bridges, fords??
marczoutendijk (2016-06-26 10:49:36+00:00): Welkom op OSM!
Lees de welkomstwiki hier:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Vooral het deel over de BAG-import is voor jou belangrijk: ieder huis in Nederland wordt automatisch geïmporteerd en bestaat altijd uit een pand EN een adres. Op het door jou bewerkte deel is nu te zien dat daar 2 keer huisnummer 4 op staat en je hebt ook nog eens de straatnaam toegevoegd. In principe overbodig, want al de adresgegevens staan al op de adresnode!
Wil je zelf voor de correcties zorgen? (dwz. huisnummer en straat op pandcontour weer verwijderen)