piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
InfosReseaux (2023-01-09 09:34:23+00:00): Hi and thank you for the feedback.

The static grid model is long term data and is often outdated.
Raie-tortue was cleaned up during 2022 and the information is on ground : https://www.google.com/maps/@48.7888654,2.2508341,3a,75y,168.51h,91.66t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sFZ0hzfWlLOvahQrGqfo7Qw!2e0!5s20220801T000000!7i16384!8i8192 (I don't use streetview to map in OSM obviously, local people surveyed themselves, this link is just to show the difference in August 2022)

Even official data is outdated from that perspective
https://odre.opendatasoft.com/explore/dataset/enceintes-de-poste-rte/map/?disjunctive.etat&location=17,48.7887,2.25051&basemap=jawg.light
Oriol Raventós (2023-01-09 10:30:35+00:00): I see. You are right. Thank you for providing such a strong evidence. Should I cancel my changes? Or do you want to do it yourself?

Thanks again for your help.
Oriol Raventós (2023-01-10 14:54:24+00:00): I justed rolled back that changes. Thanks again.
InfosReseaux (2023-01-10 15:58:04+00:00): Sounds good

Thank you too :)
eggie (2022-12-02 06:54:36+00:00): Dag Rotterdammer..
Tip..
Bicycle=no hoort niet op wandelpaden.
Dat is default.

Mvg
Eggie
user_1957122 (2022-12-02 08:50:31+00:00): Dank voor de tip!
canfe (2022-12-04 16:49:17+00:00): abbreviazioni
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129619210
canfe (2022-12-04 16:50:22+00:00): Ma questa non sarà via dell'abbazia?
E poi a parte la piazza?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129619256
ivanbranco (2022-12-01 21:56:13+00:00): Ciao Alessandro, 

questo edit non può essere corretto, come può la stessa foto rappresentare tre differenti bagni?
ivanbranco (2022-12-01 22:00:26+00:00): Tra l'altro questa stessa foto era già stata associata 4 ore fa da un altro utente ad un bagno del secondo piano: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905770042
prettyapathetic (2022-12-01 20:43:26+00:00): Edit: Should be Carlisle not Brownlee
osmviborg (2022-12-02 06:59:38+00:00): Det er kommunen der bestemmer placeringen af punkterne. Al vedligehold af adresser sker automatisk via brugeren 'AutoAWS'. Det er helt almindeligt at punkterne er lidt fejlplaceret indtil byggeriet er færdigt. Læs mere her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/autoAWS
gscholz (2022-12-04 09:43:01+00:00): Hi Fidelis,
this changeset has destroyed several boundary relations like "Monção", "Cajari" etc:



https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-44.84216&lat=-3.44460&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129619632

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Fidelis Assis (2022-12-04 12:57:29+00:00): Hi Guido,

Thanks for the warning. Fixed (closed) now.
gscholz (2022-12-05 07:23:14+00:00): Hi Fidelis, ,
thanks for your quick response. There are still a lot of broken relations like "America/Manaus Timezone":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-59.16818&lat=-9.49935&zoom=8&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Are you able to use OSM inspector to verify your activities do not leave any errors?
Guido
Hufkratzer (2022-12-02 11:24:44+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118745175 ist ein Reitplatz (so wie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391158989, s.a. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz) und keine Reitanlage (leisure horse_riding).
Den Preset kann man in JOSM (nur etwas mühsam) finden, indem man z.B. nach "pferd" sucht und dann "Pferdesport" wählt (wird hoffentlich irgendwann einfacher).
mcliquid (2022-12-04 08:28:45+00:00): Danke, habe es behoben. JOSM findet in der Vorlagensuche mit dem keyword "Reit..." nur Reitanlage und nicht Reitplatz. Werde in Zukunft darauf achten es manuell zu pflegen. Viele Grüße
Hufkratzer (2022-12-04 10:51:31+00:00): JOSM kann leider (noch) keine Aliase/Suchworte, siehe https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/14404
canfe (2022-12-04 16:52:46+00:00): abbreviazioni
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129619728
Papryk_00 (2022-12-03 00:06:02+00:00): Drobna uwaga, miejsca parkingowe zaznaczamy jako pełny segment z podaną ich ilością; a nie każde z osobna.
Pozdrawiam:)
NorthCrab (2022-12-03 19:02:47+00:00): ^Nie zgodzę się.

Dokumentacja: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking%20space. 

Przykład użycia przy pałacu kultury: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.23149/21.00913
kakiremora (2022-12-01 21:26:46+00:00): w tym brzydkie wyrzucenia residentiali poza teren ulicy bydgoskiej
HellMap (2022-12-02 11:59:44+00:00): Hello again,

You deleted these foot paths and service road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678073522/history#map=19/57.31535/25.36589
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58077061/history#map=18/57.30986/25.36374
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427976003/history#map=18/57.31350/25.36930
But they are all visible on the aerial. Can you please explain why you removed them?

You also changed some cycleways into sidewalks along https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118753245/history or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/976240018/history or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/589580610/history#map=17/57.31638/25.33212 . Are these really no longer cycleways? I have also previously asked you about changing cycleways to sidewalks and you did not reply.

Thanks
jaap de vries (2022-12-12 15:26:22+00:00): Je had de aed aan het gebouw geplakt dat was niet zichtbaar als poi op de kaart. Ik heb het weer zichtbaar gemaakt door deze iets voor het gebouw te zetten.
jxpsert (2022-12-12 15:34:15+00:00): Hij zit daar aan de muur, dus leek mij logisch om ‘m dan op de muur te zetten. AED’s worden door OSM toch sowieso niet gerenderd? Op bijvoorbeeld OpenAEDMap was ‘ie gewoon te zien.
jaap de vries (2022-12-13 07:22:30+00:00): Normaliter zijn die m.i. wel zichtbaar, net als bv een dokter. Rendering kan even duren.
jxpsert (2022-12-13 07:30:25+00:00): Er wordt tot op heden nog over gediscussieerd, maar ze worden momenteel niet gerenderd. Daarbij mappen we voor data, niet om de kaart mooi te maken, toch?

https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1603
jaap de vries (2022-12-15 07:34:54+00:00): Ik had al zitten kijken op het oude forum want op het nieuwe kon ik niks vinden, github ken ik niet is dat ook van osm?
jxpsert (2022-12-15 07:37:12+00:00): GitHub is een platform waar open broncode gedeeld wordt. De OSM renderer deelt hier haar code.
Dodko (2022-12-04 09:13:04+00:00): od budovy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118754645
až po budovu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1118754649
ste skopírovali budovu aj s adresou
opravte značky
addr:conscriptionnumber
addr:streetnumber
ref:minvskaddress
alebo ich vymažte, ref:minvskaddress je jedinečné pre každú adresu
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sk:Key:ref:minvskaddress?uselang=sk
Patr1k_P (2022-12-08 16:02:24+00:00): stale ste to neopravili, 5 budov ma supisne 867 a adresy su neuplne...ved si pozrite napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857239625/history ake tagy ma mat adresa
aceman444 (2025-11-22 10:18:05+00:00): Dakujem
eggie (2022-12-01 22:13:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  
Wanneer woningen zijn opgeleverd kun je ook de specificatie construction=house verwijderen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-12-02 06:51:01+00:00): Construction verwijderd
adiatmad (2022-12-05 03:43:48+00:00): Good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=Building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1013067900). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
lastcommodore (2022-12-01 22:17:20+00:00): Forgot to mention- some of the buildings from the imports didn't exist according to aerial, and were removed.
Adam Franco (2024-07-03 13:22:41+00:00): Hello, I was alerted by the land manager that a number of these trails are posted as private and not open to public use.

I've changed the one trail they specifically mentioned to access=private, but I am not familiar with this area and others may need access=private added as well.
CurlingMan13 (2022-12-01 22:24:22+00:00): All segments removed were checked with aerial imagery and confirmed that there are no sleepers, rails or signals remaining to meet the definition of "abandoned".  They do not exist (anymore?) and have been largely been overbuilt and replaced by buildings, roadways, parking lots and farmland where there are no remnants from the railway.
Leo Slager (2022-12-01 22:36:46+00:00): fixed broken routerelation De Lijn 170
skorasaurus (2024-08-13 18:37:55+00:00): thanks for your work on this.
archpdx (2022-12-02 01:44:00+00:00): Thanks for these changes!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129623045
Carlos Brys (2022-12-08 15:02:48+00:00): Se corrigió el nombre del supermercado
No se usan los nombres en mayúsculas
akadouri (2022-12-02 05:01:50+00:00): Hey, I believe these are not uncontrolled crosswalks due to the presence of traffic signals, they could be tagged as crossing=traffic_signal

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dtraffic_signals

Hopefully iD will be updated soon to reflect this as "Marked Crossing" now defaults to adding "crossing=uncontrolled" 

https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/issues/658#issuecomment-1333944173
Udarian (2022-12-02 05:23:39+00:00): the issue is that from what I can tell there are no stop lights for the pedestrian crossings them selves just for the car traffic, and though there are buttons for pedestrians to get an opening to walk there does not seem to be any lights for the pedestrian crossings them selves. I double checked this with mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=25.596507&lng=-80.413477&z=17&pKey=2931478883735324). So I thought that leaving it as plain uncontrolled would be wisest until such time as better information is provided since the street side imagery is rather blurry.
felipeeugenio (2022-12-02 22:41:14+00:00): Estimado
por favor no remover los tags de noexit=yes. Son muy útiles para la detección de errores de calles desconectadas.
saludos
Warin61 (2022-12-02 23:20:21+00:00): Hi,
The parking relation 14959084 is not correct. 
There is no need to use a relation here ... nor in the past changeset 120726433 parking relation 14119374. As an example I have deleted relation 14119374 and made those parking areas as simple closed ways. Please consider doing something similar with relation 14959084.
Warin61 (2022-12-05 23:24:25+00:00): No interest in fixing it? I'll delete it then?
melb_guy (2022-12-05 23:52:15+00:00): I've fixed it. It's all simpler separate areas now with no relations.
Warin61 (2022-12-06 08:07:48+00:00): Very good. Thanks.
mrpulley (2025-01-25 21:58:54+00:00): Looks like you added a maxspeed to a boundary of a nature reserve (rather than a road). Was fixed by Peter W34 at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129819044
NieWnen (2022-12-02 10:06:44+00:00): Źródło: https://www.michalowice.pl/dzieje-sie/aktualnosci/oswiatowe/pierwszy-dzien-w-nowym-przedszkolu,p899085066
NorthCrab (2022-12-02 22:39:04+00:00): Moim źródłem byłą ta notatka https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3463593 (zapomniałem dodać informacji na CS) ale tak też może być :)
crosstato (2022-12-02 00:50:29+00:00): Changeset comment Correction: split way and removed one way tag from other half of way
Mashin (2022-12-02 13:51:02+00:00): Thanks! I have adjusted the area name as it is clear that it belongs to Guilford Land Conservation Trust from operator field.
GLCTStewardship (2022-12-02 14:59:55+00:00): Thank you for the review and your additions.  We're using this as a 'test case' before we upload/correct all GLCT owned properties on the OSM and want to get it right before proceeding.  So on future additions, I'll add the tags you've included.  Is there a list of recommended tags (or a sample area) we could use as a model?   Also, is there any way to upload a gpx file and declare that as an area?  We couldn't find a way to save the uploaded gpx and resorted to using that as a template to then draw the property boundary.  Using the actual gpx  file would be far easier and more accurate.
Mashin (2022-12-04 20:03:18+00:00): Hello,
.gpx file are used for storing records from GPS tracking devices and we don't use them for direct uploads to database.
But you can use shapefile (.shp) or .geojson formats to load your data to JOSM and use that for upload. However using JOSM is for more experienced users as one can accidentally cause errors.
DressyPear4 (2022-12-02 15:43:08+00:00): Olá, não existe estrada no local.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129625273
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-02 03:08:17+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=59.178511%2C-158.660369%2C16.28
5m4u9 (2022-12-03 00:15:47+00:00): Hola, el cambio que haces en la av. illampu me hace pensar si la murillo es secundaria, siendo la illampu de doble circulación....

la clasificación la obtuve de la alcaldia pero es de hace años. Me parece que hay muchas secundarias y terciarias lado a lado y medio no tiene sentido en este sector.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
emersonveenstra (2022-12-02 12:52:53+00:00): Hi,

If the bank no longer exists, could you please delete the point with the bank info? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2022-12-02 12:53:29+00:00): oops, soory, i meant delete the bank information from the building
Elzema (2022-12-02 14:14:43+00:00): I don’t see any bank information when I am in edit mode.
emersonveenstra (2022-12-02 16:09:43+00:00): If you click on the building, you'll see the bank name and details
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
wireguy (2022-12-04 15:33:39+00:00): vaibhavnz, deleting Thompson broke Highland Park and Detroit boundaries. corrected.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-02 04:09:32+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=33.752623%2C-95.547314%2C16.01
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 11:17:00+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=kebab;+
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10232273320/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=kebab
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-12-02 04:21:57+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=38.346155%2C-82.180021%2C18.15
emersonveenstra (2022-12-02 12:51:43+00:00): Hi,

Just a quick tip, it's useful to add both opening_date and check_date to constructions so other people know when to go back and reopen it. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date for details
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129627895
RKCook (2022-12-02 22:06:49+00:00): Added, thanks.
orthocircular (2022-12-02 05:26:22+00:00): Hi thanks for your contributions! Some of the house shapes seem a little lopsided, please consider using the Square Corners function in your editor to help draw regularly shaped buildings. You might also like to use RapiD Editor (MapWithAI) which uses AI to quickly detect and map buildings.

Thanks again!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129628820
Kovoschiz (2022-12-02 09:12:09+00:00): 1. Please don't remove other names. Move them to `alt_name=` etc. 
2. `name=` is for the most common name in use by the public only.
Kovoschiz (2022-12-02 09:12:42+00:00): 3. Descriptive changeset comments please
Kovoschiz (2022-12-02 09:13:21+00:00): 4. Use OpenHistoricalMap to record the full history
goldfndr (2022-12-02 06:15:37+00:00): The value might be appropriate for an operator tag or some other tag I've overlooked. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46719320 has most of the ref tag introductions.
Kovoschiz (2022-12-02 09:14:49+00:00): Please don't attach unrelated features to other unrelated features especially roads. This doesn't represent reality, and makes editing difficult.
emersonveenstra (2022-12-02 12:30:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/727390195 please fix your mistake, thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129630374
emersonveenstra (2022-12-02 12:34:36+00:00): also, the editor warned you about that mistake before you saved the changeset, you really need to pay attention to those warnings so you don't break the map
emersonveenstra (2022-12-03 11:44:10+00:00): Not responding again, I'm contacting the DWG
emersonveenstra (2022-12-03 14:19:15+00:00): I'm going to fix the mistake because it's serious, but this is the third time this month you've broken the map with your changes, so you really need to slow down, double check your work, look at all the iD warnings, and ideally check every edit with something like OSMCha so that you are certain you aren't making the map worse.
marczoutendijk (2022-12-03 14:26:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6579
GMoney0805 (2022-12-03 21:52:05+00:00): If this comment I make here is taken negatively, my sincere apologies. It appears that few, if any, of you saw my reply when you originally reached out to me. This is the last time I will mention this. I am not here on alert 24/7, seeing the comments were made three hours apart, if I'm expected to be on top of my messages like it appears, like check them hourly, that's not possible for me. Sorry I haven't met your expectations.
emersonveenstra (2022-12-04 10:34:32+00:00): In the whole day between when i contacted you and i contacted the DWG, you made several changesets, so you were definitely active on here and able to read your emails. I wouldnt have contacted the DWG, nor would they block you, if you hadnt been actively mapping after my comment, because you're right, no one is expected to be on all the time.
Diógenes de Sinope (2022-12-03 20:51:04+00:00): 👍🏽
OldManCelli (2022-12-16 15:06:31+00:00): Hi Necessarycoot72, I just renamed the way that goes over the bridge back to Vermont Route 102 since the bridge area exists with the same name. As I understand it, the way that goes over the bridge should have the name of the road and the bridge area should have the name of the bridge. If you disagree then let me know and I will change it back (or you can revert it, but I'd like to know in case this is a rule that I'm not reading right)
Necessarycoot72 (2022-12-18 14:54:07+00:00): Yes, you are correct. After looking into it, a bridge way should have Bridge:name and the name tag. In this case, having the bridge area should inherit the Bridge:name tag and rename it to just name.
Dimitar155 (2022-12-02 06:53:27+00:00): Hello Anton,

This is not the name of the street, it's the name of the residential complex which is already on the map (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/288317770).
Anton Valodzin (2022-12-02 07:47:58+00:00): Hi, thank you for feedback!
tbicr (2022-12-14 22:39:56+00:00): Вітаю, заўважыў Ва стваралі даволі шмат аптэкаў з назвамі КТПП, КТП, ТП. Гэта сапраўды аптэкі ці гэта транфарматарныя падстанцыі? Калі гэта аптэкі можаце падказаць які можна разгарнуць атрэвіятуры?
Kovoschiz (2022-12-02 09:20:20+00:00): Please don't mix up different levels.
Kovoschiz (2022-12-02 09:44:31+00:00): OSM is about existing concepts in the most common use by the public. Use OpenHistoricalMap to reflect origins and evolutions.
Kiana_Kaslana (2026-07-23 08:20:13+00:00): 红绿灯路口不是像你这样画的。。。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
NorthCrab (2022-12-02 22:05:16+00:00): Witaj, kiedy widzisz zduplikowaną informację, np. parking oznaczony jako obszar i jako punkt - należy je połączyć i obszar jest zazwyczaj uznawany za bardziej dokładny. Co prawda, ta uwaga powinna być kierowana do osoby która ten parking oznaczała pierwotnie ale dobrze jest czasami poprawić po kimś przy okazji :P Ja już poprawię.
waldhans (2023-02-24 17:55:27+00:00): Was wäre, wenn du vor einer gravierenden Änderung selbst prüfst, ob der Laden noch existiert? Woher weißt du denn, das shop=charity  falsch ist, ohne den Laden zu kennen? 

Nachdem shop=charity ein akzeptiertes tag für „Eine Welt Laden“ ist, setzte ich das wieder zurück. shop=yes ist kein korrektes tagging!
pathmapper (2023-03-06 09:37:34+00:00): Moin waldhans, in NRW habe ich auf die Schnelle keinen "Eine Welt Laden" gefunden, der mit shop=charity getaggt ist. Statt dessen findet man z.B. shop=convenience, ggf. in Verbindung mit fair_trade="only" oder "yes". Wärest Du damit einverstanden? Das fände ich an dieser Stelle passender und auch im Einklang mit dem OSM-Wiki. shop=charity ist laut Wiki nicht gewinnorientiert und bietet Gebrauchtwaren an - beides trifft auf einen "Eine Welt Laden" in der Regel nicht zu. Viele Grüße!
user_10149683 (2022-12-02 07:40:36+00:00): Please note this is my first time doing UPRN's, if there's a issue, dm me.