piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_8334278 (2020-07-18 19:31:23+00:00): “However, marking the stop position adds no information whatsoever when it is placed on the road at the point closest to highway=bus_stop or on the tram tracks closest to railway=tram_stop. In that case it can be abandoned.”
user_8334278 (2020-08-02 14:19:12+00:00): The end of the platform is not where the train stops, factors are, # of car's, cars that are open, , how many engines, pushing or pulling, time of day, passenger load, who is driving.
emvee (2020-09-07 07:21:25+00:00): Hi Tom,

In this changeset you added Avenida de las Rosas with "biycle=no" and "cycleway=shared_lane", that does not makes sense, see http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#source=11378&item=3032&class=30329&zoom=17&lat=20.653772&lon=-103.388955&level=2&tags=&fixable=

What is correct "biycle=no" or "cycleway=shared_lane"?

Greetings,

Martin.
EinKonstanzer (2020-07-18 21:28:47+00:00): This is the border between farmland and not really a track. And quite not grade4.
Modest7 (2020-07-18 21:44:32+00:00): Yes, rather 5. Fixed. But you can also edit the map, like any OSM user. You see an error - edit.
MaddMapper (2020-07-14 22:06:59+00:00): Source Correction: Also used Yandex Panorama
b-jazz (2020-07-17 00:17:38+00:00): Hi there. Thanks for making a bunch of contributions to the map. I just wanted to point out a couple small problems so that you can avoid them in your future mapping sessions. First, sidewalks shouldn't have a "name=Sidewalk" tag. Instead, there is a "footway=sidewalk" tag that should be used. Second, ways shouldn't cross over themselves or double back on themselves. So in this change, where you come to a corner, and then double back away from the corner, a new path should be started.
No need to clean up what you've already done, I'll take care of the ones that I find, but if you could keep these in mind in the future, it would be appreciated.
Thanks, and keep up the great mapping.
Tyrese Wormely (2020-07-14 22:15:17+00:00): Apparently I'm stupid, as this is not my 2nd straight storage rental place addition in AL on OSM. Sorry.
Frans S (2020-07-23 08:13:46+00:00): Hello Tom .Thanks for mapping here. Quality mapping!
a question, During my scan for nonsquared buildings your mappings pops up, meaning not good squared. 
The mappings are fine, just not squared.
I wander if you don't use the plugin Building tool. By using this you have always strict rectangular buldings.
Check this page is you don't use it
https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-plugins/
Best regards
stevea (2020-07-14 23:30:08+00:00): Truly, sweet, nice work here at building up the PTv2 efforts!
cartogram (2020-07-14 23:11:19+00:00): #adt
AgusQui (2020-07-26 04:45:23+00:00): Por favor no mapear cosas a menos que se este seguro, o sea que conozca el lugar, es una de las reglas mas importantes de OSM. Casacuberta no pasa por debajo del Cno Buen Ayre.
Tambien es importante al extender o unificar elementos, verificar sus etiquetas y principalmente sus relaciones, había roto las relaciones de los partidos de La Matanza y Merlo.
Azarell (2020-07-26 05:29:05+00:00): Hola, pido perdón por el gran error que he cometido, no me había dado cuenta, y durante ese dia que hacía el mapeo aun aprendía algunas herramientas, tratare de asegurarme los cambios antes de subirlos.
AgusQui (2020-07-26 15:03:41+00:00): Todos nos equivocamos al principio.
Te recomiendo que entres al grupo de Telegram Argentina, ahí vas a poder sacarte las dudas que tengas, ví que estás editando en Bolivia, si sos de allá ellos también tienen un chat:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts#America
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-07-17 12:34:37+00:00): Wow, we are at 88 million changesets by now... This is going fast!
Glassman (2020-07-15 00:15:40+00:00): FYI - the campsite already existed. I merged the two nodes since yours also include a website.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-07-26 10:12:16+00:00): Czy jesteś pewien że dodane boundary=administrative jest poprawne?

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/pl:%C5%9Ar%C3%B3dmie%C5%9Bcie%20(Krak%C3%B3w)?uselang=pl podaje "Do 1990 r. administracyjna dzielnica Krakowa. Jej obszar pokrywa się z granicami obecnych dzielnic: Dzielnicy I Stare Miasto, Dzielnicy II Grzegórzki i Dzielnicy III Prądnik Czerwony." więc nie jest to jednostka administracyjna i jest to pewnie do skasowania
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-08-14 18:07:05+00:00): Czy jesteś pewien że dodane boundary=administrative jest poprawne?
edi18028 (2020-08-16 04:05:08+00:00): W dodaniu boundary=administrative kierowalem sie informacja na tej stronie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
punkt 3.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-08-16 07:55:25+00:00): Masz na myśli https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#Sub-national czy coś innego?
edi18028 (2020-08-17 14:08:07+00:00): Tym tekstem się kierowalem, bo weryfikator bledow domagal sie wpisu boundary=administrative.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-08-17 21:43:37+00:00): Tyle że jeśli nie istnieją to powinny być skasowane, a nie dostawać boundary=administrative
kubahahaha (2020-09-07 14:38:37+00:00): Czy można śmiało kasować? Tego nie ma od 30 lat
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-07 22:27:28+00:00): Ja bym kasował. Mieszkam w Krakowie od zawsze i nigdy o tym nie słyszałem.
kubahahaha (2020-09-08 20:48:47+00:00): Skasowałem
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90605700
edi18028 (2020-09-09 14:10:33+00:00): boundary=administrative jest już do usunięcia.
kubahahaha (2020-09-09 21:37:00+00:00): W którym miejscu? Myślałem że wszędzie wchodzi w skład innych relacji
edi18028 (2020-09-11 03:44:27+00:00): Chodziło o dodanie administrative do granic delegatur (podział adminitracyjny urzedow), ale to już nieaktualne, bo ktos je juz usunal.
jmapb (2020-09-12 20:04:07+00:00): Hi there... you seem to have deleted lots of footways that I created, and as far as I can tell they're still real. Is this is mistake? Is there something I'm not understanding here?
jhmeniscus (2020-07-15 02:59:21+00:00): A better schema for this would be to place nodes at the beginning and end of the steps. split each node so there is a new way segment between the nodes and tag the way "highway=steps", then you can notate surface, # of steps etc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88000491
skorasaurus (2020-07-16 15:41:11+00:00): hi,

welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for editing.

the man_made=works tag that you applied to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/826318059

is not a good description for that area https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man%20made=works 

That area is very likely an office (I am local to the area and have been very close to physically)

Regards,
Will
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88000695
user_8334278 (2020-07-15 00:36:27+00:00): this is my stop in my backyard.
user_5359 (2020-07-15 04:49:58+00:00): Hello! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes. The pharmacy deosn't exists anymore? Please delete also the key ref.
compdude (2020-07-18 19:35:47+00:00): This should not be tagged as motorcycle parking. Only stalls specifically intended for motorcycles should be tagged with this tag.
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-09-16 22:52:55+00:00): Facultatea de Istorie și Filosofie la UTM? FRIȘPA - UTM? Asta în timp ce acestea se află pe teritoriul la USM? Serios?
compdude (2020-07-18 19:34:50+00:00): If a road is closed for construction, the construction=* tag should be construction=primary (or whatever the highway=* tag was--in this case it was tagged as highway=primary, so you should use the construction=primary tag). You tagged it as construction=minor, which has caused this road to disappear from the map. Also construction=minor is not a valid tag--see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction for valid tags to use on highways under construction.

I would appreciate it if you fixed this, thanks!

Also, you tagged the opening date as 2020-07-15. Is this correct?
Your Village Maps (2020-07-20 21:48:19+00:00): I noticed you changed much of CO 40 along I-70 from secondary to tertiary. State routes are typically mapped as secondary, but in this case I think tertiary is fine, as the vast majority of traffic uses I-70. You left the streets running between 40 and 70 in Deer Trail and Agate as secondary; I will change them to tertiary as well.

Did you change any speed limits? I found one long segment of CO 40 north of Deer Trail with maxspeed of 45 mph, but I know it's 55 mph, so I will fix that too.
Oregonian3 (2020-07-20 21:56:49+00:00): Thanks for the feedback! I agree; the vast majority of state routes should be at least secondary, but there is zero reason for any non-local traffic to use this route.

With regards to the Deer Trail and Agate streets that exit I-70, I purposefully left those as secondary since they are the main points of access into those small towns. But it's not a hill I'm willing to die on and I can see the argument for tertiary as well.

I did not change speed limits as I consider them beyond the scope of the work that I've been doing.
Frans S (2020-07-18 10:39:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
wille (2020-08-02 21:08:38+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Reverti sua edição, pois, apesar de ter havido a proposta de ter esse nome e uso para o canteiro central, a lei não estabelece esse uso: http://www.sinj.df.gov.br/sinj/Norma/49713/Lei_1755_28_10_1997.html

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88001386
Mashin (2020-07-15 07:57:35+00:00): I seems here they suggest to add 'cycleway:left:oneway=-1' as well.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dopposite_lane
andrewsuzuki (2020-07-15 13:55:32+00:00): Interesting, what does -1 mean?
Mashin (2020-07-15 17:55:37+00:00): I assume that should indicate opposite direction to the general traffic, but I couldn't find any information.
Frans S (2020-07-18 11:45:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Please take your time to map accurate. You will waste Validators time if they have to correct lots of inaccurate mappings.
Use a mouse to draw.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Mike Raust (2020-07-24 12:05:55+00:00): What was wrong here?
I don't really understand https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88004912
Gianfranco2014 (2020-07-24 12:29:08+00:00): 
Hundreds of errors emerged from data validation with JOSM, and I corrected them.
mariotomo (2020-11-03 17:12:56+00:00): debo comentarte a este también.  te he señalado al DWG por estar produciendo basura, y van a necesitar ver a qué me refiero.
Alvarado2510 (2021-02-14 05:22:38+00:00): Bueno Mario si vez la fecha de edición y la comparas con el tema en el chat del grupo veras que hay meses de diferencias, pero tranquilo, revisare y buscare la basura que señalas en open Street Mapa.
mariotomo (2021-04-02 16:36:51+00:00): así como hace 5 meses, he vuelto a revisar, y no encuentro justificación a esta contribución.  I reverted this in changeset:102206186
mariotomo (2020-11-03 17:14:10+00:00): debo comentarte a este también.  te he señalado al DWG por estar produciendo basura, y van a necesitar ver a qué me refiero.
Alvarado2510 (2021-02-14 05:24:18+00:00): Saludos, bueno veré que basura añadí.
mariotomo (2021-04-02 16:19:20+00:00): buildings here were all same size, mostly also same orientation, not all of them corresponding to a single building, some not visible on Bing nor Maxar. a bit late, but I reverted this contribution (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102205106).
Cascafico (2020-07-15 08:59:14+00:00): Così come l'hai mappato, l'attraversamento è sui binari: sei sicuro che non sia sotto (in tunnel)?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88005864
pza (2020-07-16 01:34:27+00:00): Can we really use maxspeed:type=AU:urban given different states have different values? Or do we assume routers will additionally look up which state a road is in? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_limits_in_Australia#Default_speed_limits_by_state_and_territory
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88007583
ortho_is_hot (2020-07-16 06:45:13+00:00): Interesting, it seems that StreetComplete no longer allows you to put in the maxspeed when the source is a default. So in answer to your question, the maxspeed should be entered first, then the :type as additional information (which I'll go ahead and fix now). Personally I use AU:urban because when I do add such limits I add them along with the maxpseed of 50 (or 100), but if we wanted to start using something like AU-NSW:urban then that should be up to community discussion. But having the router look that information up doesn't seem unreasonable to me, considering that we already have other state-wide properties defined on the border relation (e.g. def:highway=footway;access:bicycle=no)
pfiers (2023-01-07 10:01:33+00:00): Please only edit OpenStreetMap to reflect neutral and on-the-ground verifiable information. The tag operator="Moeder natuur" does not accurately reflect the true operator of this area. This chageset may be politically motivated (see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88008701).
Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130973957
pfiers (2023-01-07 09:58:29+00:00): Please only edit OpenStreetMap to reflect neutral and on-the-ground verifiable information. Commentary or links to political organizations are neither. 
Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130973957
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-07-15 06:16:04+00:00): Hello Ico656,
Welcome to OSM!
Please make minor changes that are limited to smaller areas (maximum one country).
greetings
Roger Wilco
Roger Wilco
pesec (2020-07-16 07:35:32+00:00): Если вы хотите показать ремонт дороги, то меняйте её тип с тегом "constraction" и указывайте теги с датами проверки окончания работ. Иначе ваш блок так и останется на карте, пока кто-нибудь не заметит
Taxist23061982 (2020-07-16 12:23:12+00:00): Благодарю, учту свой просчёт)
Nmxosm (2020-07-15 19:22:21+00:00): Hallo wuppi86,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deine Änderungen. 

Für Wege gibt es in OpenStreetMap einige Standardwerte, die gelten, wenn Nutzungs-/Zutrittsrechte nicht explizit erfasst sind (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany). Daher ist es in diesen Situationen unnötig (aber nicht formal falsch), die entsprechenden Werte explizit zu nennen. 

Zum Überblick sind die folgenden Seiten sicher hilfreich:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Bei Fragen melde dich bitte einfach als Antwort hier, schreib unter https://forum.osm.org/ oder einer der zahlreichen Mailinglisten (z.B. http://lists.osm.org/mailman/listinfo/talk-de) oder erstelle eine Note (https://osm.org/note/new)

Ich hoffe, ich konnte dir erstmal weiterhelfen.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
wuppi86 (2020-07-16 09:07:47+00:00): Hi Nmxosm - 

danke Dir. Das hat geholfen! :-)

liebe Grüße
vasony (2020-07-18 13:52:53+00:00): Tisztelt szerkesztő!

Kérem legközelebb ha az utcanevet javítja, javítsa azt a címadatokon is, hogy egységes legyen. Most ezt megtettem.
A forrást is hasznos lett volna feltüntetni.

Köszönettel, Tamás
soshial (2020-12-18 15:19:18+00:00): Hi, why did you remove wikidata and all boundary tags from these relations? We need it (the data you deleted) to draw districts in Wikivoyage.
user_177389 (2020-12-18 22:44:55+00:00): Hello, the wikidata tags are located on the way elements (the ones for which the relations were also created). But these lines are places. I was wondering why there were also administrative boundary relations that were not administrative boundaries ... (Does place multipolygon fit better? However, closed rings don't need a relation.)
soshial (2020-12-19 04:05:20+00:00): Wikidata demands to link only to relation, because ways and points are not stable enough. But you deleted relations and moved all tags to ways, which is a wrong approach.

Besides this, how to mark administrative boundaries is written in OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative).

Here's an example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11898665#map=14/41.7109/44.7668

There is a relation with boundary=administrative and two parts of relation: 1) a simple enclosed way (with no tags or information) and with role=outer and 2) a label (with the name of this administrative division).

Do you mind, if I restore those relations, move back needed tags, setup linking between OSM and Wikidata? Or you can do it yourself? Thank you for understanding.
user_177389 (2020-12-19 08:09:13+00:00): I take care of it. But I will also clean up the overlaps, i.e. cut the members so that no double lines are on top of each other -> create additional place multipolygons. The geometry remains unchanged.
soshial (2020-12-19 08:59:47+00:00): Great! Thank you very much to you!

Do you have an idea why these borders do no match? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11300446#map=13/41.8017/44.7156

(compare Tbilisi border with Saburtalo district border)
user_177389 (2020-12-19 10:22:52+00:00): I have finished the overlap between the equivalent boundaries (place polygons / district boundaries without admin_level). It's all terrible there. My suggestion: Cut some of the boundary relations so that the existing admin_level=9 border lines and higher can share. Tbilisi should be able to be filled in without overlaps and free spaces.
user_177389 (2020-12-19 11:03:58+00:00): Because of the difference between Tbilisi border and Saburtalo district (which is just an example): The Tbilisi border is 9 years old and the source (Jumpstart International) could have been simplified. Which limit is more precise would have to be decided by someone who is familiar with the area.
soshial (2020-12-26 17:54:43+00:00): Thank you a lot for your edits!
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-07-26 15:29:03+00:00): Hallo Guido,

Hier gaf je een 'natuurgebied' aan bij een huis. Bedoelde je de weide wat meer naar het Oosten?

Is er wat meer info te vinden over dit natuurgebied? Dan teken ik dit ook in als oppervlakte met meer informatie.

Mvg, Pieter
maraf24 (2020-07-22 08:31:30+00:00): Deleted.
eggie (2020-07-15 08:12:25+00:00): Dag Rienk.. In het begin worden edits van starters gevalideerd. Uiteraard ook om te helpen.
In OSM Nederland worden geen adressen op de "buildingshape" gezet.
Er is al een identieke adresnode. Die heb ik losgemaakt van de omtrek. De dubbele vermelding heb ik verwijderd.
Houd wel periodieke BAG updates in de gaten, want grote kans  dat er straks een gebouw op een gebouw staat.
Zaken die niet kloppen kun je het beste doorgeven aan het Kadaster via deze site middels een terugmelding.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=grotewaard%208&resultOffset=0&objectId=0689200000004407&geometry.x=124030.122&geometry.y=434716.295&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0689010000002755

Wanneer de BAG klopt kun je het beste om een import vragen via het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
Inlog identiek aan osm account.
Tip dan wel even de BAG importeur dat je building:parts hebt toegevoegd.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12  
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-15 11:03:54+00:00): PB contact
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-16 08:39:26+00:00): Hove you dicussed this import as required by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

What is the copyright status of imported database?

What is the point of adding GNS:dsg_name =populated place to place=village?
حبيشان (2021-01-16 09:15:35+00:00): "Hove you dicussed this import as required by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines"

No, I do not know about this page before import, I focused only in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GEOnet_Names_Server
 I would like you to but a link in to 'import' page in GNS page in the wiki.

"What is the copyright status of imported database"

It is public See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potential_Datasources

"What is the point of adding GNS:dsg_name =populated place to place=village"
I am flowing GNS import guides as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GEOnet_Names_Server and other resources
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-20 18:35:36+00:00): Thanks for a reply!

"I am flowing GNS import guides as "

I asked on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:GEOnet_Names_Server#What_is_the_point_of_dsg_string.3F and I plan to change this recommendation unless someone has a good reason for that.

"No, I do not know about this page before import"

Can you read and follow instructions there? Especially parts of documenting import and describing what actually happened and asking editing community whatever it is desirable to perform it?
حبيشان (2021-04-18 23:21:40+00:00): I wrote the import page see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GNS_Import_for_Yemen_and_Others
Pt873 (2020-07-15 19:37:03+00:00): Olá. O que aconteceu com a faixa de areia das praias?
Ometepe (2020-07-15 21:16:22+00:00): Hi Pt873, thanks for reaching out. In an effort to create better topology between the beach and coastline I merged the shared boundaries together at the mean high spring water level where the coastline is mapped. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=coastline#Where_is_the_coastline.3F
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beach#How_to_map
Pt873 (2020-07-15 23:06:20+00:00): Entendi. Estranhei pelo fato de a sua marcação ter sido feita no nível do mar durante a maré cheia, o que reduz bastante a faixa de areia nas praias. A variação da maré aqui em São Luís é bem grande, em torno de 6 metros, e geralmente a faixa de areia é mais larga.