piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-09-22 07:49:49+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd. Je advocatenkantoor zonder naam heb je midden op het Transferium Vlijmenseweg geplaatst.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Ik zal de bijdrage verwijderen
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 08:50:05+00:00): Also here `oindoor` instead of `indoor` at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5120598345
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-22 10:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52269395, 52270300, 52269682, 52271305, 52270647, 52271642, 52270992, 52268780, 52269993, 52269109 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from PC10, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52260776
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-22 10:23:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52269395, 52270300, 52269682, 52271305, 52270647, 52271642, 52270992, 52268780, 52269993, 52269109 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from PC10, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52260776
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 08:22:05+00:00): Hello arcanma. Arround the Piazza della Repubblica you have tagged `bicicle=yes` instead of `bicycle=yes`, right? #typo
arcanma (2017-09-22 09:09:00+00:00): Hello Harald, you are right, my mistake (and english poor knowledge). I'll fix as soon as possible (this afternoon). Thank you
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 09:20:45+00:00): Hello schadow1. At you have used a new (and so far unkown) key `width:lane`. Could it also be `lane:width`? https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/lane%3Awidth
schadow1 (2017-09-22 10:04:08+00:00): Got it here. But I misspelled too. Should be "width:lanes"  Which is best to use for this matter? 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 10:42:32+00:00): If there's a mention in wiki, then i would use the wiki one ;-) And `width:lanes` has got the most usage at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=width
schadow1 (2017-09-22 11:07:53+00:00): Gotcha :)
dgitto (2017-09-21 22:39:22+00:00): E che c'entra natural=water in una fontana? Non è granché natural
Arlas (2017-09-25 12:02:11+00:00): le ultime sue 500 modifiche sono strane e non risponde ai messaggi
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 08:14:11+00:00): Hello PC10. Within this changeset, you have introduced some new (and so far unkown and undocumented) keys: `aream2` (could be automatically calculated by the way/area itself), `namead`, `proyecto`, `valued`. What are all the keys for? Also i think this look like a little bit of an import, right?
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 08:45:56+00:00): and i forgot `LCC`
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 08:47:59+00:00): and now i found also `leaft_type` instead of `leaf_typo`.
I think you should revert all your changes!
M!dgard (2018-03-23 19:50:07+00:00): tower:type="communication:mobile_phone=yes"

Hier is precies iets misgelopen …
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-03-26 12:07:02+00:00): Idd, copy-paste error. Fixed it.

Hoe de fuck heb je deze vergissing gespot...
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-22 10:23:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52269395, 52270300, 52269682, 52271305, 52270647, 52271642, 52270992, 52268780, 52269993, 52269109 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from PC10, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52260776
dgitto (2017-09-24 20:10:23+00:00): What kind of "details"? You deleted a lot of ways a nodes here. May you please specify what, in the changeset comment?
Arlas (2017-09-25 11:56:04+00:00): sta cancellando tutti i marciapiedi a Catania, un disastro!
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-22 10:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 52269395, 52270300, 52269682, 52271305, 52270647, 52271642, 52270992, 52268780, 52269993, 52269109 where the changeset comment is: Remove undiscussed and faulty imports from PC10, see comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52260776
Athalis (2017-09-21 23:09:50+00:00): road cleanup, not only classification. source also esri
Glassman (2017-09-22 01:22:56+00:00): Can you give a tag that describes the Camano Island Cattle Company? Just a name is kind of lonely. Is it a restaurant, amenity=restaurant? Let me know if you need help figuring out what tag to add.
fgouget (2021-03-06 19:03:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Le champ start_date du Club des Amis de Préfailles ne correspond pas à une date valide.

La valeur 'Juillet et Aout' ne devrait-elle pas se trouver dans le champ opening_hours ? (éventuellement avec précision des jours et heures d'ouverture)

Cordialement,
Glassman (2017-09-22 01:27:17+00:00): Does the car wash have a name?
Hjart (2017-09-22 06:09:53+00:00): Please do not touch our adress nodes. They are imported from the official danish register. I'm not entirely familiar with those removed here, but often adresses are created in advance of new developments.
Hjart (2017-09-22 07:23:57+00:00): A fellow contributor has already reverted the deletion of the adresses in question as well as created a new building etc :-).
Note that the aerial imagery currently seen in iD (when editing in DK) is from spring 2016 and that some development could have happened since then.
drkt (2017-09-22 11:51:49+00:00): I read about the AWSBot, but I was not aware it would place addresses ahead of time. I drove by this area not that long ago and I noticed no construction, and the most recent aerial imagery from 2017 also shows nothing special about the area, so I assumed it to be a mistake. But, I'll note it down not to touch the adresses.
osmviborg (2017-09-22 14:23:31+00:00): @derakderantick have a closer look at the 2017 aerial pictures. They clearly shows the site as a construction area with new buildings.
drkt (2017-09-22 15:04:59+00:00): I'm not sure which maps you are referring to. iD does not have any maps available that shows this area under construction.

I'm not arguing it isn't under construction, I just don't know where you're getting the aerial view from.
osmviborg (2017-09-22 15:52:48+00:00): here you go: https://servicelist.kortforsyningen.dk/show_sample.aspx?maptype=WMS&servicename=orto_foraar_temp&layerselector=true&screenmode=newwin
Carnildo (2017-09-22 19:31:04+00:00): Thanks for the addition to the map.

Right now, you've got the entire facility marked as being a single building.  Is there a particular building, possibly the big one in the middle, that's the actual office?
user_5359 (2017-09-26 17:25:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-22 09:13:43+00:00): Hello azsr. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526611519 you have tagged `toilet:disposal` instead of `toilets:disposal`, right?
azsr (2017-09-23 14:31:30+00:00): @Harold Hartmann

Yeah, sorry. Was typing too fast. I've fixed it with my latest edit.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52305517
naoliv (2017-11-23 11:33:59+00:00): Bruno, bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap.
Você acabou apagando a vila de Buril, que já existia, para depois coloca-la novamente no mapa.
Caso encontre algum problema no mapa, tente corrigir o objeto que já existe, sem apagá-lo de forma desnecessária.
Constable (2017-09-22 05:55:09+00:00): is there any specific reason why you created this node 20-30 meters into the sea?
woodpeck (2017-09-22 08:48:51+00:00): Hello PC10, these data imports are faulty (they introduce bad keys and they have over-noded, pseudo-precise geometries that seem to come from converting a raster map to vectors). Before you import anything more, please consult the import guidelines at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and discuss your plans. The data source and license are also unclear. The imports will be reverted.
mueschel (2017-10-02 18:54:42+00:00): Hi PC10, hi woodpeck,
there are many more nodes and areas imported since, including newly invented tags (aream2, LCC, proyecto, ...). It also seems that most features do not correspond to actual features in the satellite images - e.g. forest multipolygons have the largest trees excluded, borders don't match at all. 
Should these be deleted?
woodpeck (2017-10-04 08:23:23+00:00): Yes they should. We know nothing about the source - it is claimed that there's some community project - but the data suffers from geometry anomalies and bad tagging and the import hasn't been discussed. I am deleting the data now and have asked PC10 to discuss any further plans on the imports list.
Jakson Aquino (2017-09-25 20:30:44+00:00): As ruas internas do Shopping Jóquei deveriam ser classificadas como "service" porque são vias de acesso ao estacionamento. Veja: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:highway%3Dservice
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-10-03 05:47:01+00:00): Please do not remove road splits in Maharlika Highway, especially for you do not survey the road yourself. I already requested for part of this changeset to be reverted. Please be reminded to use detailed comments on following edits. Removing those road splits looks unconstructive, but seeing you as a new user, this must show that you need more experience to map here.
ianlopez1115 (2017-10-15 08:58:53+00:00): Hello,

Please take note that in OpenStreetMap, we follow some editing standards and conventions (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions). One such standard and convention is the mapping of divided highways (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways). Please do not remove edits indicating the location of divided highways, unless there is a clear and conclusive proof that that stretch of road is no longer a divided highway such as a physical survey. If that is the case, indicate it as such by making a comment after editing (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments).

Also, please do not arbitrarily change maximum speed limits unless there is proof showing the actual speed limit for the areas that you went and edited.
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:40:11+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
PT-53 (2017-09-28 09:11:02+00:00): Hallo Ralf,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz u.a. diesen Weg neu eingezeichnet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526627666#map=17/48.29961/9.87570
Dabeu hast Du die entspr. Attibute / tags vergessen. Trägst Du diese noch nach ?
Schau Dir auch nochmal den Wegeverlauf an. Auf dem Mapbox-Luftbild im Editor JOSM sind das etwas anderst aus.
Grüße
RC-Tours (2017-09-28 13:57:53+00:00): Wie gewünscht die vergessenen Attribute noch nachgetragen und den Weg besser eingezeichnet
eggie (2017-09-22 07:57:18+00:00): Je hebt hier de naam van een busroute verwijderd met als commentaar dat je een fietroutebord hebt geplaatst. Wat is precies je bedoeling. Ik stuur je het welkomstbericht zoals iedereen dat krijgt met nuttige tips. Lees je eerst goed in en verander niet zomaar edits van andere mappers. 
Wanneer je vragen hebt kun je gerust reageren.
eggie (2017-09-22 08:04:32+00:00): Ik zie al dat er een opgeloste note op zit.
ff5722 (2017-09-23 09:06:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414600778
你好
谢谢你的贡献！
你为什么把改这个道路从highway=unclassified为highway=road?
unclassified就是不重要的道路
road就是道路未知类型
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#Roads_and_tracks
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-24 08:24:47+00:00): Hello Meiyizhou. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5121187789 you have tagged `road sign=Height restriction` instead of `traffic_sign=maxheight`, right? Please have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign
This is for the traffic sign (node) itself. But you have to tag this to the way as an attribute, too.
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:33:45+00:00): Olá, Rogellys.
Nesta sua edição você criou uma proibição de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Rogellys Alves (2017-12-07 04:43:09+00:00): Gostaria que fosse mais específico em qual alteração eu errei, pois todas as alterações que eu fiz foi de acordo com o que sei, pois frequento o local praticamente todos.
Rogellys Alves (2017-12-07 04:44:33+00:00): E fiz alteração de acordo com sinalização dos locais.
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:50:54+00:00): Foi um proibido retornar neste caminho https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391484143
Você criou um "proibido retornar" dele para ele mesmo, ficando assim no editor que você utiliza https://i.imgur.com/GreVEz1.png
Já se entende que não podemos fazer um retorno na própria rua, sendo desnecessário inserir uma restrição dessa forma.
JeroenHoek (2017-09-22 09:58:58+00:00): Dank je, ik heb 24-64 over het hoofd gezien daar (26-64 en de Rietlandroute kloppen wel als het goed is?).
nevw (2017-09-22 08:01:56+00:00): a very novel way of mapping
R0bst3r (2017-09-26 09:35:53+00:00): Hallo hauser69,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe den Weg mit Steg angepasst und den Steg eingezeichnet. Allgemein sollten nur Eigennamen in das name Tag!
Die private Hütte hatte -1 Etagen, hab das auf eine geändert.
Viele Grüße
frosm (2018-10-18 10:05:42+00:00): Bonjouret bienvenu sur openstreetmap.
une délibération de qui ?
une délibération de quoi ?
d'installer une 40aine de panneau d'information ?
de nomer ces 40 panneaux ainsi ?
pouvez vous poster la photo de l'un d'entre eux ?
Alecs01 (2017-09-23 13:51:19+00:00): Ciao, hai creato diverse linee senza tag sovrapposte alle strade, cosa rappresentano? Via Carlo Porta invece si sovrappone per un tratto a Via Vincenzo Monti.
Davie Dean (2017-09-22 08:51:51+00:00): Hey zatium, This link may help: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings, and it should eventually show up here if you want to check if it was done right: https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=-27.49399&lon=152.91059&zoom=18&rotation=0&tilt=30.
keithonearth (2025-02-11 21:32:55+00:00): What's up with the small grassy area you've mapped as a park? (Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526675645/ )

Did you hear something about the ownership being transferred to the Vancouver Park Board, or are you just basing it on the satellite imagery? If it's the latter, I think it would be better to just map it as grass.
Stereo (2017-09-22 10:32:25+00:00): Looks perfect :)
axelr (2017-09-23 08:59:19+00:00): Der name tag bei routen sollte (wenn kein Eigenname vorliegt) bestehen aus Verkehrsmittel Nummer Doppelpunkt Start=>Ziel. Und das ganze möglichst kurz. Ein Wortvergleich auf Langnamen ist hier entbehrlich.

Im Gegensatz dazu sollte der Haltestellenname Bestandteil in  from, to oder via sein und dort auch überprüft werden.

Im konkreten Fall war das zunächst ein Arbeitstitel zur Unterscheidung der Varianten während der Bearbeitung.
ToniE (2017-09-23 13:05:32+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich dachte bislang (wohl nicht richtig gelesen), dass das 'via' Teil von 'name' sein sollten. Hmm, da müssen wir in München wohl noch nachbessern.

'=>' sollte wohl aber mit Blanks vom Rest getrennt sein, oder?

Gute Hinweise: 

1.) 'from', die Teile der 'via' (Semikolon getrennt) und 'to' sollten als 'name' bei Haltestellen auftauchen. - wobei 'name' bei stop_position und platform optional sind, wenn eine stop_area existiert. Kompliziert zu prüfen?

2.) 'from' und 'to' sollten in 'name' der route auftauchen (regex: name =~ m/ ref: from => to$/ - um es ganz penibel zu schecken

3.) 'ref' sollte in 'name' von route und route_master auftauchen. Derzeit nur eine 'Anmerkung', kein 'Fehler'

4.) mehr als ein '=>' in 'name' einer route sollte nicht erlaubt sein

Gruß
Toni
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:39:33+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-23 16:13:05+00:00): Hello GerdP. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309097494 you have tagged `cylkeway:right:surface` instead of `cycleway:right:surface`, right? #typo
GerdP (2017-09-23 17:51:28+00:00): Argh! Fixed this also. Hope this was the last one.
Noen (2017-09-26 20:02:37+00:00): Jeg kan ikke se at det var noe merkelig med skoginndelinga her? Splittingen følger utløpet på Syverudtjern. Glippa i skogen er på nesten 6 meter, men bekken er riktignok ikke kartlagt.
man_made=cutline fordrer at ryddinga faktisk er menneskelagd, det er den antageligvis ikke her.
anderfo (2017-09-26 21:23:00+00:00): OK, jeg synes det er merkelig å dele skogen pga en bekk, da det stort sett er opplagt at bekken ikke er dekket av skog.
Jeg syklet her i sommer og krysset denne "glippa" i begge ender uten å klare å finne den, altså verken oppe ved Syverudtjern eller der stiene kommer ned til Dyrefaret (det var kun litt åpning rundt stien, som forventet).
På satelittbilder ser jeg en stripe som likner en vanlig bekk - men mener du glippa betydelig bredere enn selve bekken?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-17 13:05:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53011130 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names that appear to have been copied from a Russian library book.  See block 1591 and changeset 52420815 for the attempt to find out licence details (or where the names may be verified).
TianLan (2018-09-29 15:53:27+00:00): Have a look at 台灣楓康超市, the building is actually square. Aerial imageries are often confusing, because of several reasons.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orthophoto
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling
happy mapping - continue mapping
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-23 16:01:39+00:00): Hello Gumeg. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283557194 you have tagged `brend` instead of `brand`, right? #typo
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-24 08:30:23+00:00): Hello Mappernerd. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5121407405 you have tagged `Tamaraind=Crockshop & Ralphs`. Should it be the `name` instead? #newkey
user_4081914 (2017-09-24 16:23:11+00:00): many thanks i will fix that
indigomc (2017-11-16 18:32:58+00:00): This is not a satisfactory explanation for the changes you have made. Please contact me ask in the forums before you make such changes  again.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-23 20:00:26+00:00): Hello Hagar66. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5121426932 you have tagged `netword` instead of `network`, right? #typo
mavl (2017-09-22 17:41:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Видимо, произошла какая-то ошибка. В этом пакете правок изменены административные границы двух сельских поселений таким образом, что они стали совпадать с другими объектами. Например, с лесом:  
  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/526702853  
  
Эта линия не является границей леса (на спутниковом снимке Bing не видно границы леса). Лучше не объединять административные границы с природными объектами, если не известно, что они совпадают (иногда в законе прямо пишут, что граница проходит по середине реки и тогда границы могут совпадать).  
  
Лучше считать их разными объектами, которые не имеют общих точек (например, линии ЛЭП и дороги).
GerdP (2017-09-23 06:09:27+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review the two footbridges
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/157076842
and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467751510
see 
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309
gurglypipe (2017-09-22 10:18:36+00:00): I don’t think addr:interpolation is valid to use on areas — it needs to be used on a line. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Using_interpolation

Are those building on Holden Way actually houses, or are they apartments? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=apartments
John-O (2017-09-24 16:30:40+00:00): That would make sense because an area doesn't have a direction specified in the same way a line does.

They each have a front-door entrance at ground level so they are probably houses. Unlike a row of terraced houses, it isn't clear exactly how the properties are divided within the building. 

I think the best thing would be to remove the `addr:interpolation` tag, but it would be nice to specify that the building contains only odd numbers. I don't really like the idea of drawing a separate way
gurglypipe (2017-09-25 09:43:05+00:00): You could maybe use entrance= on the doorways, and addr:flats=1;3;5 (for example) on the entrance node for those numbers, and addr:flats=7;9 for another entrance node. If the number of front doors doesn’t match the number of addresses for the building, it’s almost certainly a set of flats (or a HMO, but you can tag that like flats).
R0bst3r (2017-09-26 09:27:04+00:00): Hallo vistaoptic,
willkommen bei OSM.
Öffnungszeiten müssen in OSM in einem speziellen Schema engetragen werden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
Überprüfen kann man die Eingabe z.B. hier: http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
Der Eintrag wurde bereits von einem anderen Mapper korrigiert.
Viele Grüße
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-22 10:23:16+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52258419, 52258513, 52258856, 52258952, 52259151, 52259498, 52260121, 52260496, 52260776.
4004 (2017-09-26 11:01:03+00:00): хм, напротив ПВТ добавили переход?
tuxayo (2017-09-22 12:02:57+00:00): Bonjour,

Que veux dire le message de changeset? (Maj → Mise à jour, ça va c'est assez clair)

Ça ne permet à quelqu'un de comprendre ce qui a été fait sans aller voir les données. Donc ça apporte plus de confusion que ça ne documente le changeset.
user_5359 (2017-09-22 15:47:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please the defintion of leisure=track: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtrack

And son't add any private information. 

If you need help: You are welcome!
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-22 10:23:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52258419, 52258513, 52258856, 52258952, 52259151, 52259498, 52260121, 52260496, 52260776.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-22 09:14:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52244838, 52245128, 52245612, 52245674, 52245697, 52245710, 52245771.
Piskvor (2017-09-22 09:29:26+00:00): wrong changeset title, was supposed to be "fix: not embassy"
indigomc (2017-09-28 17:14:00+00:00): Changeset reverted, no additional info
Hjart (2017-09-22 09:40:34+00:00): Are you entirely sure about this? Note that adresses in Denmark are imported from the official danish adress registry and that any errors should be reported to the municipality.
ThomasOEM (2017-09-22 09:50:52+00:00): Maybe I should change it back and simply edit the “house name”. The reason is that this is a resort where the apartments have different numbers, ex 252... the official number (24B) is not shown on the facade.
I will change it back :-)
Hjart (2017-09-22 09:54:52+00:00): Editing the "house name" sounds like an good option.
Welcome to our project btw and thank you for your contributions.
eggie (2017-09-22 11:31:27+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd