piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tcarlisle (2022-09-23 19:14:50+00:00): I think in most cases the official naming is a good idea.  With this trail, though, almost no one knows it as anything other than "Donut Falls Trail." this section from Cardiff Fork Road to the trail that is now called "Donut Falls Connector" is a recent addition and when this new alignment was built out a few years ago the only name associated with it was "Donut Falls Trail." In fact the signage says "Donut Falls"

When viewing other USGS sources the "Jordan Pines" is not in use and the old name for the "Donut Falls Connector" was just part of the "Donut Falls Trail" https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/topoview/viewer/#15/40.6447/-111.6579

Give the historical use of the name "Donut Falls Trail", the fact that signage either uses this name or is absent of the official "Jordan Pines" name, I think it would be confusing to the public to change the name of such a high-use trail to an unfamiliar name.  This is why I switched it back. 

For the record, though, I did not switch back other trails that you updated with official names...despite my favorite name, "Red, White, and Bluebird" being removed.  I'll leave it to you to decide if that one should stay.  lol :)
Oregonian3 (2022-09-23 19:19:56+00:00): Your arguments are persuasive on this one! I'll make a note on the trail with what you're saying and add the official names as the alt_name.
Oregonian3 (2022-09-23 19:28:05+00:00): FYI, my method for marking trails as official is if they are acknowledged on any official map or resource from some entity that manages the trails in the area (e.g. the USFS, a ski resort, or a city), or have been acknowledged and maintained by organizations like Trails Utah. Otherwise I'm marking them as informal.
Frans S (2022-09-24 08:31:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126555686
4004 (2022-09-25 21:10:06+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
поправил точку на подстанцию (вы же ее хотели отметить?).
на снимке видно только стройку и какой то фундамент южнее
Anton Khorev (2022-10-03 22:00:37+00:00): Hello,

You and user b-jazz have been splitting and rejoining the same ways several times. For example, here's a version list with node counts: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1085646864

You asked b-jazz about reasons for splitting and b-jazz answered:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125583342

Later b-jazz asked you about your reasons for undoing the splitting but you didn't reply:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126277120

Why do you think that your version is better? Can you reply to b-jazz's comment?

Best regards  
Anton Khorev  
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2022-09-25 15:10:13+00:00): Hello1 Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/1557737462. What is the meaning of the tag cyclway = asl (on a node)?
Wookey (2022-09-25 23:59:51+00:00): Typo for 'cycleway'. Thanks for spotting. Fixed.
The meaning is that there is an advanced stop box for bikes (in the forward direction): (details near the bottom of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway )
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2023-02-28 20:01:33+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة الأماكن الشخصية للخريطة العامة
sekai128 (2022-09-30 14:20:50+00:00): Hallo Baakie,

De `description` tag mag niet gebruikt worden om te adverteren. Dit wil zeggen dat er alleen feitelijke informatie in mag staan. Ook was je description te lang, dus waren de overige karakters aan het eind weggelaten. Om het korter te maken zou je bijvoorbeeld het "sinds 2007" gedeelte van de beschrijving in een aparte `start_date` tag kunnen zetten.  Voor meer informatie over het correct gebruik van de `description` tag, zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description

Met vriendelijke groet,

Sekai
eggie (2022-09-30 15:52:23+00:00): Hi

Merged info with present addressnode..  removed building=yes and advertising..
Greetz,
eggie
sekai128 (2022-09-30 15:53:29+00:00): Ook heb je een nieuwe node aangemaakt met hetzelfde adres als de node die er al stond. Je kan beter al die informatie die je hebt toegevoegd in de bestaande node zetten die geïmporteerd is van de BAG, zodat er geen dubbele adressen zijn.
sekai128 (2022-09-30 15:55:17+00:00): (Ik zie net dat eggie dit al heeft opgelost, bedankt eggie)
Frans S (2022-09-24 09:49:55+00:00): Please stop mapping not existing objects like fences here. 
As said before. This is a building only project.
I remove these  odd mappings.
Please spend your time on mapping of the buildings here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126557573
Frans S (2022-09-24 09:47:32+00:00): Hello.  Please stop mapping and tagging roads as unclassified in farmland.  This project is a building only project.
One has no traces on the ground. The others should be tagged as track at bes.t
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126557682
Kays (2022-09-24 12:28:56+00:00): This change is wrong:
• On the bridge only the pedestrian part is open. Bicycles cannot pass.
• Ways 21361666 (eastern part), 194832680, 1090340620 are still completely blocked.
Komadinovic Vanja (2023-03-30 07:58:45+00:00): Hi,

Just wanted to double check and make sure it's not error in changeset.

Per you changeset ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/922964608 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827371815 are not connected anymore?

I'm maintaining data about hiking trails that Montain Engineering Association of Serbia has and couple of trails are passing those ways.

Thanks for you time,
Vanja
solesensei (2023-03-30 09:24:49+00:00): Hi, 

We were hiking the trail in September. 
We saw some faded signs proving there was a hiking trail. 
Unfortunately when we went down, it turned out that there was no path. We spent about 40 minutes to climb back 300 meters. We used maps.me to navigate, which uses OSM.

So I decided to make this change, to help other hikers.
solesensei (2023-03-30 09:39:14+00:00): About ways you marked – it can be a mistake.

I just removed the path next to the river right after this part.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857898878
Komadinovic Vanja (2023-03-31 05:05:51+00:00): I understand, I will then just connect two paths around Brakov cardak restaurant. 

Thanks for quick response, happy hiking!

Best,
Vanja
Duja (2025-09-30 16:09:33+00:00): For the record, I hiked here and added this path back in 2020. It's a steep downhill slope that had been blazed by MTBers, but still passable at the time. Apparently, the nature took it back soon after due to lack of use. I have no objections to deleton, to prevent future incidents.
eggie (2022-09-24 06:33:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback. Lijkt me oke zo. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Udarian (2022-09-26 05:07:34+00:00): I have not been to this site but I dont think that there is a building this size here
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126558087
YomanNH (2022-09-25 21:02:01+00:00): Cześć,

z czego wynika zmiana rodzaju dróg z residential na service? To, że jakaś droga jest drogą wewnętrzną nie oznacza, że powinna być tagowana jako highway=service. W przypadku zmienionych dróg zdecydowanie lepiej pasuje highway=residential.
kwiatek_123 (2022-09-23 17:57:01+00:00): Na pewno nie ma tutaj parku o tej nazwie.
Ygramul (2022-09-26 22:00:51+00:00): Du hast hier zwei Gebäude entfernt, die abgerissen worden sind. Oft ist es besser, sowas nicht direkt zu löschen, sondern stattdessen die Gebäudeumrisse mit einem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix zu versehen. Dann verschwindet es auch von der Karte, aber es wird nicht von Luftbildern kurze Zeit später wieder eingetragen und man verliert die Adresse nicht.
Velosoph (2022-09-27 07:38:31+00:00): Bleiben Adressen in Deutschland immer bestehen, wenn Gebäude abgerissen werden und am selben Ort irgendwann neue gebaut werden (die ja z.B. den Raum von zwei abgerissenenen Gebäuden einnehmen können und dann wohl nur eine Hausnummer bekommen)? Ich denke mal, dass es bei Neubauten immer sinnvoller ist, sie von Grund auf neu zu mappen, incl. Adresse, Gebäudetyp usw.

Das mit den Luftbildern ist natürlich ein Argument...
Supaplex030 (2022-09-27 08:27:45+00:00): Streng genommen ist die Adresse dem Grundstück zugeordnet und nicht dem Haus. So kenne ich es zumindest aus Berlin. Also vermutlich bleibt die Adresse bestehen (außer im seltenen Fall von politischen/administrativen Änderungsbeschlüssen).

Ich würde auch die z.B. "razed:building"-Schreibweise empfehlen. Wenn irgendwann neu gebaut wird (oder wenn viele viele Jahre vergangen sind ;), würde ich diese dann löschen und das neue Haus neu zeichnen. Aber da gibt es auch Mapper, die würden die alte Geometrie mit neuen Tags wiederverwenden (wir diskutieren darüber gerade in der deutschen OSM-Telegram-Gruppe :). Das kannst du dann also so machen, wie du es für richtig hälst.
GerdP (2023-08-06 06:31:24+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich habe einige Deiner Änderungen am Rittrumer Mühlbach rückgängig gemacht. Da, wo Du ein Rohr unter einer Straße (tunnel=culvert) siehst, sehe ich klar Brücken über einem Bach, der in voller Breite durchfließt.
https://www.osm.org/way/1195174994
https://www.osm.org/way/1195174977
OK?
Myazyk (2022-10-08 20:03:47+00:00): https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%96%D1%8F:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8_%D0%A3%D0%BA%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%97%D0%BD%D0%B8 - оце канали, а млинівок у нашому регіоні було багато. Вони якби і канали, але на карті їх потрібно позначати як міліоративні канали, бо вони маленькі, вузенькі і у теперішній час часто замулені або пересохлі.
ardash (2022-10-11 20:27:22+00:00): Змінив на дренажний конал міліоративний канал - не знайшов тег.
DaveF (2022-10-05 00:05:10+00:00): Hi
To check, is this a recreation ground? It looks decidedly bumpy. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056626271
matts_maps (2022-10-05 08:00:15+00:00): Technically it still is although it has been unused for a while, hence the bumpiness.
DaveF (2022-10-05 13:18:46+00:00): When was it last used as a cricket pitch?
matts_maps (2022-10-17 05:51:08+00:00): Not for sometime. It is still considered and refered to by the parish council the cricket pitch, even though it is very overgrown and there are plans to bring it back into good consition. Have changed it to reflect that it's abandoned/ unused at the moment.
ualios (2022-09-27 19:45:52+00:00): Ciao e grazie per il contributo. Nessun particolare errore ma solo qualche osservazione.
Nella chiesa hai taggato anche l'indirizzo con il civico 64, ma questo sembra già correttamente mappato lungo la strada dove appare anche il civico 64a. Per evitare ripetizioni o errori (ma forse anche come regola generale per gli edifici) sarebbe più utile sostituire i tags "addr" della chiesa con "contact" e lasciare quelli specifici del civico sul nodo.
Avrai anche notato che la chiesa è già mappata come nodo amenity e tipo di confessione religiosa e dunque abbiamo di fatto una doppia mappatura. Meglio completare la taggatura del nodo con i tuoi dati oppure quella dell'edificio con i tags del nodo. Mappare l'edificio è certamente meglio ma quale, visto che adiacenti tra loro ci sono 8 edifici già taggati building=church? Se, come sembra, si tratta di 8 parti dell'intero edificio ecclesiastico, allora sarebbe meglio, anche se leggermente più complicato, mappare tutto come relazione (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building). E anche a occhio mi sembra che l'area della chiesa sia più vasta dell'edificio che hai taggato. Nel dubbio se sia effettivamente tutta "chiesa" sarebbe preferibile mettere i tags sul nodo e non sull'area.
wireguy (2022-09-24 11:17:30+00:00): Squared the corners on the Giant and stores in shopping center.  Maybe you can verify the Mavis and La fitness, and adjust the footprints of the buildings.   Keep mapping!
wireguy (2022-09-24 11:09:06+00:00): Tim, welcome to osm!  quick tip, pressing 'Q' on selected object squares the corners and makes it look nicer.   Squared this one for you.
Dimitar155 (2022-09-23 19:24:18+00:00): Коментара на тази промяна трябваше да бъде "Унифициране на брандове".
ygcgjp5 (2022-09-24 06:47:45+00:00): Ar tikrai reikia nuimti? Pavadinimas nereiškia kad čia yra fortas, tiesiog taip vadinamas šis rajonas. Reikėtų patikrinti, ar šis pavadinimas yra oficialus.
PaoloLombardi (2022-09-24 09:42:53+00:00): Ciao. 
Sul percorso 1057734066 in basso è un tornante stretto oppure è un bivio senza uscita e tornando indietro l'hai disegnato come "doppia traccia"?
Il percorso 1097361673 finisce così nel nulla oppure si collega nel tornante della strada di servizio della cava oppure è una nuova strada della cava in espansione in quella direzione?
PS. Non so se fai qualche importazione di tracce su OSM ma su questo Path ci sono troppi nodi. Ne bastano meno per dare una buona precisione del percorso.
eggie (2022-09-24 06:35:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
wireguy (2022-09-23 20:16:07+00:00): HI cdp!  Welcome to OSM.  Great to see you get involved with the map.  When outlining a building, try to do the building and not the surrounding sidewalk and grass areas.   Pressing the 'Q' key will square the corners on the selected object.    Also try to not attach things together, like the football field and parking lot are attached.  The hockey rink by the middle school would be a great add with your local knowledge (ice? roller?).   Enjoy.   If you have any q's just ask, or join the discord/slack.   Keep mapping!
Branko Kokanovic (2022-09-30 14:29:00+00:00): ovo je isto kao i https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1658166? Ovo je dosta velika izmena, mozda bi trebalo da pokrenemo diskusiju da li zelimo da otvaramo ovu pandurinu kutiju zvani statisticki podaci. Jel mozes da zapocnes temu na forumu, tj. discoursu sada ili na mailing listi?
Srdjan023 (2022-10-07 18:30:56+00:00): Nije isto kao [1]. [1] je administrativna jedninica a "Srbija - jug" je statistička jedinica, nisu jako komplikovane sve piše ovde [2] i ovde [3].

[1]https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1658166
[2]https://www.stat.gov.rs/sr-Cyrl/oblasti/registar-prostornih-jedinica-i-gis/administrativno-teritorijalna-podela-i-nstj-nivoi-1-2-3
[3] https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B8_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B8_%D0%A1%D1%80%D0%B1%D0%B8%D1%98%D0%B5
Branko Kokanovic (2022-10-07 18:45:36+00:00): Da, nije isto kao [1]. Ali da li želimo da unosimo statističke granice? Do kog levela, gde je kraj?:) To mi je pitanje. EVo admin leveli nismo nikad uradili MZ (level=10), ne znam da li planiraš da ideš na dublje nivoe statističkih granica?
Srdjan023 (2022-10-08 21:22:43+00:00): Ne vidim problem da se unesu statističke jedinice nema ih puno, zavanične su i koriste se, a i poslužiće kada budemo unosili podatke sa popisa. Što se tiče nivoa nema potebe da se ide dublje od NSTJ 3.
eggie (2022-09-24 06:44:32+00:00): Hi,
Please don't split buildings..
I restored the BAG data.

Greetz,
eggie
abakus_uploader (2022-09-23 22:32:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2022-09-24 06:39:48+00:00): Tip.. Gebruik svp niet de dakranden van gebouwen om deze uit te lijnen. Daar staat niet het gebouw.
Alle gebpuwen zijn import vanuit het Kadster beter niet aanpassen. Bij updates gaat het verkeerd. Bedrijven svp bijtaggen op de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-24 06:43:02+00:00): BAGdata hersteld. 
Bedrijf verplaatst naar adresnode. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-24 07:38:02+00:00): typo.. Alle gebouwen zijn import vanuit het 'Kadaster' en als zodanig precies ingemeten.
somix (2022-09-24 07:54:11+00:00): Was there a reason to delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788581175/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788581176/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788581177/history?
fjavier_gr (2023-04-02 15:04:52+00:00): Hola Andrés,

Veo que has colocado la ref de la Nacional en la etiqueta nombre. ¿Podrías corregirlo? Gracias.

También es importante que las bifurcaciones de las rotondas, y las propias rotondas, no sean trunk_link, son parte de la propia carretera y deben ser trunk con su correspondiente ref.

Un saludo.
fjavier_gr (2023-04-02 15:06:17+00:00): Te dejo enlace al lugar exacto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/38.1501/-3.0181
Andrés31 (2023-04-04 20:09:37+00:00): He corregido los fallos que he visto de los links, pero no he visto ningún tramo que tenga puesta la referencia en el nombre
Andrés31 (2023-04-04 20:10:28+00:00): Lo que sí he visto es un sendero que han llamado "Ruta colesterol" que me imagino que lo habrá mapeado alguno para uso propio que de momento no he eliminado pero supongo que eso habría que quitarlo
fjavier_gr (2023-04-04 20:20:10+00:00): Hola,

En el enlace que te he dejado más arriba tienes la rotonda y sus accesos que aún tienen la etiqueta name=N-322 en lugar de ref.

Un saludo.

Un saludo.
Andrés31 (2023-04-04 20:53:57+00:00): Hola, creo que ya están corregidos. No los vi bien la vez anterior.
Un saludo
Cyclono (2022-09-25 21:49:31+00:00): nice!
literan (2022-09-24 07:57:45+00:00): сломали в этой правке мультиполигон Битцевского леса (самопересечение). Почините сами?
velomeloman (2022-09-24 18:31:55+00:00): Что-то не могу найти. Можете мне в t.me/velomeloman написать и объяснить?
Władysław Komorek (2022-10-01 15:14:25+00:00): Wandalizm. Do usunięcia. 
Brak oparcia na danych źródłowych.
eggie (2022-09-24 07:19:59+00:00): Dag Foofoo.. Hier klopt het niet meer.
Staat er hier wel een bord fietspad?
tracktype=grade2 is niet paved. Het is bv surface=gravel.. 
Wanneer er geen bord fietspad staat niet als fietspad taggen.
Graag reactie, want nu ligt er een fietspad in het niets.  Geen aansluitingen op andere fietspaden. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-24 10:05:59+00:00): De voorgaande tagging heb ik teruggezet.
Het is nu weer half verhard.
Mocht er een bord Fietspad G11, 13 en/of 12a zijn gekomen laat het even weten.
Wanneer je de verharding wilt toevoegen dan graag specifiek. 
surface=.....   bv fine_gravel   .. gravel ? 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-24 06:46:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Het zal niet veel aan de kaart toevoegen als je deze tag gaat toevoegen aan winkels in het algemeen. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-24 06:47:29+00:00): Oke....  Let we; op dat als het bedrijf gekoppeld is aan een adres dat je het adres dan intact laat.
Hier is het goed gegaan.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-24 06:58:54+00:00): De info staat ook al op het gebouw zelf. Het een of het ander.
Kijk je nog even?
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-09-25 08:03:16+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast...  
mvg
eggie
eggie (2022-09-24 06:51:13+00:00): Je hebt het gebouw verwijderd.
Maar waarom?

building=yes is essentieel voor rendering. De functie van een gebouw kan er uiteraard ook op staan.
Ik zal het herstellen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-24 06:56:01+00:00): Gebouw hersteld. Info verplaatst naar adresnode.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
FraukeLeo (2023-12-25 16:42:03+00:00): Hallo PHerison, bitte nicht solche unmöglichen (und wirklichkeitsfernen) Abbiegewinkel 
https://ibb.co/9hLWy5L in Kreuzungen einbauen – danke :)
matt_ellery (2022-09-23 23:48:16+00:00): Hi Matt,

La Piazetta has already been mapped. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/500015826

I've removed the duplicate node and added your tags to the original one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126564961
Carto_Ferret (2022-09-23 22:06:43+00:00): Comment: Added footways off of Alarmpladsen #adt
Emilius123 (2022-11-23 22:54:58+00:00): Haha, geil Alter, dass du einfach YouTube Videos rein hast. Absolute Legende.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-25 21:58:19+00:00): You removed the Arabic name entirely for n6622087786 , please restore it.
ڕاستی (2022-09-26 19:34:18+00:00): برای من دەبێت ناوەکەی بە کوردی بێت لەبەر ئەوەی ناوەکەی کوردییە و دەبێت سەرەکییەکە کوردی بێت. من بەرپرس نیمە لە زیاد کردنی ناوی عارەبی بۆ شوێنەکان بەڕێزت دەتوانیت ناوی عارەبی لەسەر نیشانی name:ar زیاد بکەیت. پاشانایش ناوەکەی بە تەواوی هەڵەیە.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126566317
LockOnGuy (2022-09-26 19:42:10+00:00): Do not remove names entirely! If ’name’ was in Arabic and you want ‘name’ in kurdish then move ‘name’ to ‘name:ar’ but do not remove it entirely!      
You removed thousands of Arabic names from northern Iraq! Even hundreds of ‘name:ar’ tags!      
for example in changeset 63292043 you deleted 82 name:ar and 50 loc_name:ar? why???
ڕاستی (2022-09-29 14:34:43+00:00): برای من قسەکەم ڕوونە و ڕەوانە هەتا ناوە عارەبییەکەش هەڵە بوو.  بەخۆشت باش دەزانی شتی هەڵەش دەبێت بسڕێتەوە.
ڕاستی (2022-09-29 14:35:47+00:00): "You removed thousands of Arabic names from northern Iraq! Even hundreds of ‘name:ar’ tags!"

پێویست ناکات هەموو دەمێ قەوانی کۆن لێدەوە.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-29 14:39:39+00:00): No, they were correct, I do understand all languages including Arabic, and Arabic were 100% correct. You removed them because you did not like them.     
I suggest to keep your problems, political and ethnic views to yourself and not on the map.
ڕاستی (2022-10-05 22:07:36+00:00): "I suggest to keep your problems, political and ethnic views to yourself and not on the map."
تۆمەتان مەبەخشەوە بۆ خۆت باش نییە.
Gustavo22Soares (2022-10-05 00:29:22+00:00): arvore é ponto ;)