piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
simon_geovelo (2019-07-19 06:54:56+00:00): Salut José,

C'est clairement une erreur de ma part. Normalement je met le designated uniquement si il ya des pictos ou un panneau piste cyclable/voie verte. 
J'ai corrigé les données.

Simon
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Enock4seth (2019-06-29 10:19:44+00:00): Hi Chris, Can you please tell the purpose og this facility? Thanks
chrisgyan (2019-06-29 19:30:18+00:00): Its a parking slot for visitors
mavl (2018-12-25 00:16:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Vietnam Surf Camp (2019-12-24 05:48:43+00:00): Please remove false information about our camp. 
These people stating that never stayed with us.
Vietnam Surf Camp (2019-12-24 05:49:52+00:00): Witout understanding camping is located in front of one of the best wind-and kitesurf spots in the world.
Please remove it asap
Константин Гам (2018-11-29 16:03:32+00:00): Откат правок без причины наказывается баном, что это на фейк аккаунт хроноса, а?
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Mawgan (2018-11-29 15:41:24+00:00): #hotosm-project-5355 #missingmaps #myanmar #ayeyarwady #cisco
DaveF (2019-01-03 00:15:22+00:00): Hi 
You appear to have duplicated & offset a whole section of the Peak District Nation Park:.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/650691621#map=11/53.3465/-1.9353

Could you explain what you were attempting so I can hopefully fix it?

Your edits may need to be reverted to rectify the problem.
GBee (2019-01-03 09:58:23+00:00): I've no idea how that duplicated/offset section was created, I'm going to blame the editor. I was working on fixing a large missing section of the western park boundary between Hayfield and Chapel-en-le-Frith. Also an incorrectly tagged section at the southern boundary. At present the Park doesn't render at all in those renders which show them (osmand is one example) because of various broken parts - this wasn't always the case. I hadn't finished the fixes. The section you highlighted can (650691621) can be entirely deleted but to revert the whole commit would wipe out a lot of work on the correct path.

This is the section I was fixing - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162867451#map=12/53.2709/-1.8864
DaveF (2019-01-03 11:53:58+00:00): Hi
I think you've misunderstood how the National Park was constructed using tags within a relation:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/EVE
Placing the tags on ways is erroneous (They don't render on the standard map) & has always been incomplete:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/EVF

You extended an existing way as indicated by this node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6103593096
It had the PDNP relation on it. However the adjacent roads & ways already had that relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169013312

It looks like another user also added some incorrect tags.
GBee (2019-01-03 14:20:50+00:00): Well I didn't misunderstand, but I did miss the presence of the relation on those roads. I'm aware that the relation is the correct way to define an area such as these and that the tags are pretty much useless, however they were pre-existing on the existing sections of the boundary and more for the sake of continuity I retained them. 

As for missing the relations, I'm just not used to the new web editor, I more used to the potlatch editor where relation information was front and centre. I guess that whole set of changes can be reverted then. However there is stick a break somewhere as you can see, the park isn't be rendered. I've fixed it a couple of times in the distant past and I've grown tired of finding it broken yet again.
DaveF (2019-01-05 13:17:39+00:00): I've removed all NP tags from the ways & transferred them to the relation. On ways left  without any tags I've added a clarifying note to hopefully dissuade mappers from adding tags to them.
The relation is rendering on the main map (line & label around the borders). The darker green fill & main label shown when zoomed out it displaying, but will hopefully when the tiles get render in the next couple weeks.

I find http://ra.osmsurround.org/ very useful to check the validity of relations.

If OSMand still isn't rendering it might be worth contacting them to see if they can update their code.
woodpeck (2018-12-06 12:31:38+00:00): The runway you have drawn in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/650701197 is not visible in the Bing imagery which you claim as a source. Is the source specification wrong, or the runway?
R0bst3r (2018-12-05 08:30:52+00:00): Hallo thbrandt,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Wenn du auf das Gebäude noch einen Rectsklick machst, kannst du das Gebäude rechtwinklig machen.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65015567
thbrandt (2018-12-06 09:01:50+00:00): Hallo, vielen Dank für das Feedback. 
In zwei Punkten verhält sich das von mir angelegte Gebäude nicht wie die umliegenden Gebäude:
a) wenn ich in die Karte hineinzoome verschwindet der Grundriss des Gebäudes in der höchsten Zoomstufe. 
b) die Hausnummer erscheint nicht im Grundriss 
Bitte gib mir dazu noch den Tip. Will ja keinen 'Pfusch' in die Karte einbauen...
Viele Grüße Thomas
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65015567
R0bst3r (2018-12-07 06:52:07+00:00): Moin,
a) liegt daran, dass bei Änderung es eine Weile braucht, bis alle Zoomlevel neu gerendert wurden. Einfach etwas abwarten. Sollte inzwischen passen.
b) Liegt wohl am Friseur-Icon, das als "wichtiger" eingestuft ist. Ansonsten würden sich Icon und Hausnummer überlagern. Ist aber nicht weiter schlimm! Alles ist da und wie es sein soll.
Gruß
neo-plan (2018-12-01 14:40:28+00:00): У вас именно магазины средств реабилитации? Если просто аптеки, то у них другой тег должен быть!
neo-plan (2018-12-01 14:41:37+00:00): И в данном месте, значок вне здания находится. Это правильно? Какой-то киоск на улице или нужно всё-таки на здание его подвинуть?
VA00 (2019-10-11 13:05:49+00:00): NA ul. Chodniki nie położyli asfaltu?
muralito (2018-11-29 20:18:45+00:00): Hola Laberne, esa calle ya estaba mapeada como que tenia bicisenda en las mismas avenidas.
mueschel (2018-12-13 11:44:07+00:00): Hi,
what is a "post_pickup"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6103696537

Thanks, Jan
highflyer74 (2018-11-30 08:33:44+00:00): Moin hermann51!

Bitte nicht schon wieder... Es wurde schon unendliche Male darauf hingewiesen, dass straßenbegleitende Rad- bzw. Fusswege nicht noch einmal den Namen der Straße bekommen. Sei bitte so nett, Dich auch weiterhin daran zu halten und entferne den Namen wieder an den betreffenden Wegen. Danke!
Nakaner (2018-11-30 13:25:18+00:00): Hallo hermann51,

die DWG musste schon einmal eine 0-Stunden-Sperre verhängen, damit du die anderen Mitwirkenden ernst nimmst. Zum Nachlesen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1431

OSM ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt. Es wird nicht funktionieren, wenn du dich konsequent entgegen der Bitten und Aufforderungen anderer Mapper sträubst und sie ignorierst. Das widerspricht dem Gemeinschaftsgedanken und ist unerwünscht.

Viele Grüße

Michael
highflyer74 (2018-12-04 12:36:53+00:00): @hermann51: Es sind jetzt vier Tage vergangen, in denen Du auch weitergemappt hast. Auf meinen CS Kommentar, über den Du eine Email bekommen haben müsstest, hast Du leider nicht reagiert, so wie Du auch sonst nach wie vor nicht auf CS Kommentare reagierst. Auch der Name wurde vom Radweg nicht entfernt.

Ich würde mich über etwas Gemeinschaftssinn freuen, denn ohne den funktioniert ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt nicht.
PT-53 (2018-12-05 11:24:48+00:00): Hallo hermann 51,
unvollständige Daten und Fehler von anderen Mappern geben keine Rechtfertigung eigene Regeln einzuführen.
Grüße
highflyer74 (2018-12-05 14:34:19+00:00): Hallo hermann51 und vielen Dank für die Reaktion Deinerseits.

Ich überprüfe nicht speziell Deine Änderungen, sondern auch die aller anderen Mit-Mapper, so wie es einige andere auch machen (Stichwort "Qualitätssicherung"). Wenn jemand nach gewisser Zeit nicht reagiert, frage ich nach. Und zwar stets freundlich und um Problemlösung bemüht. Es geht hier nicht darum, Leute zu nerven oder herum zu kritisieren, sondern darum, die OSM Daten langfristig qualitativ auf einem guten Niveau zu halten.

Jeder macht Fehler und die CS Kommentare dienen dazu, einfach und sachbezogen nachzufragen, wenn Dinge unklar sind. Dies ist ein völlig normaler Vorgang. Auch mich haben schon Mapper angeschrieben und bezüglich meiner Änderungen etwas gefragt. 
Was eben bei der Allgemeinheit nicht gut ankommt ist, wenn man trotz mehrfacher gegenteiliger Hinweise auf seiner Meinung beharrt und nicht einen einzigen Hinweis beantwortet. Dann gehen die anderen Mapper entweder von einem technischen Problem aus, oder vermuten eine Person, die als "Einzelkämpfer" unterwegs ist und kein Interesse daran hat, sich mit den Meinungen anderer auseinander zu setzen. Letzteres ist nicht hilfreich. Auch sollte man realisieren, daß die verwendeten Tags und Meinungen der OSM Gemeinschaft sich im Laufe der Zeit verändern und Dinge wie z.B. postal_code=* an Wegen in Deutschland nicht mehr nötig sind. Einfach immer so weitermachen, weil man es immer schon so gemacht hat, hilft niemandem weiter.

Ansonsten sind Deine Beiträge selbstverständlich willkommen.

Eine schöne Weihnachtszeit wünsche ich auch!
gileri (2018-11-30 19:08:36+00:00): Bonjour, j'avais passé pas mal de temps en allant sur place et en me basant sur les plans publics bien détaillés pour modéliser ce carrefour, pourquoi avoir enlevé tout ces détails ?
gileri (2018-12-02 15:56:40+00:00): Modifications annulées : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65098623
Mike Baggaley (2018-12-07 18:24:44+00:00): HI, way 25382675 you have downgraded from secondary to tertiary in this change. However, it has a ref of B6236 on it. If the ref is incorrect, can you please remove it? If the ref is correct, please revert the highway to secondary, so it complies with the UK tagging guidelines.

Thanks,
Mike
alexey_zakharenkov (2018-11-30 00:06:19+00:00): Аптека - это amenity=pharmacy.
shop=medical_supply - это магазин  медицинского оборудования.
gurglypipe (2018-11-29 18:10:05+00:00): Should this have designation=bridleway, if it’s signed as such?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65016794
Mark Edmonds (2018-11-30 16:23:01+00:00): I think it was highway=bridleway before, and I have made sure it is now highway=path and designation=public_bridleway and that the access types are correct. Which I think is equivalent? I did this so the difficulty fields (for hiking, mtb & horseriding) are now easily editable. I haven't set them yet though as I need to remind myself by going along it again!
gurglypipe (2018-11-30 16:28:16+00:00): Yup, I think that’s all OK. Seems to fit in with the tagging guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UK_access_provisions#Public_bridleways
mueschel (2018-11-30 11:25:55+00:00): This import created a large number of tags that shouldn't be in OSM: "telenav:action=new"
mueschel (2018-12-09 12:39:24+00:00): I cleaned up these tags. Please be more careful.
santamariense (2018-11-30 14:41:23+00:00): O que seria CPC? Caixa postal comunitária?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65017106
rene78 (2018-12-01 19:33:44+00:00): Hab's versucht einzutragen. Hoffe das stimmt so.
freeExec (2018-11-30 07:13:14+00:00): Если вы продолжите удалять здания - это приведёт к вашей блокировке
R0bst3r (2018-12-05 07:58:59+00:00): Hallo kbareiss,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen großteils gut aus.
* Wie du selbst schon herausgefunden hast, sollte in Parkplatz nich 'P' heißen. In den name Tag kommen nur Eigennname, wie z.B. "Parkplatz auf dem Rohrwang" wenn sie denn wirklich so heißen.
* Die Zollgasse war nun doppelt vorhanden und entgegen deiner Beschreibung durchgehend befahrbar.
* Das Gesagsstudio sollte noch um ein Haupttag ergänzt werden, damit es auf der Karte angezeigt und gefunden wird. Habe leider nur eine Musikschule gefunden. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dmusic_school
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65017685
dval (2019-01-17 18:15:24+00:00): Улица Солидарности (вверху, слева) не имела (я поправил) пересечения (общего узла) с другой улицей Солидарности. Пользуйтесь редактором JOSM, он заметит ошибку и сообщит о ней.
literan (2018-11-29 19:58:02+00:00): Удалил "Пролив", кривые названия внес в табачный магазин - откат
JeroenHoek (2018-11-29 19:59:13+00:00): Klopt niet helemaal ben ik bang. De construction-tag slaat alleen op de landuse (residential hier). In de construction-tag zet je wat de waarde van de met een construction-value gemakeerde tag wordt (hier landuse).

Het stukje waar de winkel komt kan eventueel landuse=retail zijn als die gebouwd wordt (Noordoosten van dit blok dacht ik).
E de Wit (2018-11-29 21:41:40+00:00): Ik wilde de landuse=* niet splitsen ivm. de  name=Kadekwartier voor het hele gebied.

Ik ga het gebied even splitsen met de voorgestelde tags waar ik de landuse=construction en de overkoepelende benaming / notitie / website) laat staan.

't wordt nu aangepast, maar even kijken of dit is wat je bedoelde.
JeroenHoek (2018-11-30 12:04:19+00:00): Ja, dat is inderdaad een probleem waar niet echt een mooie oplossing voor is.

Eigenlijk zouden we voor de naamgeving van zo'n blok als deze (en Hoog Vossepark hierboven) place=city_block moeten gebruiken, om zo een scheiding te maken tussen landuse (hier residential en retail) en naamgeving van een gebied. Voor wijken/buurten, etc. werkt de place-tag al.

Alleen wordt place=city_block niet gerenderd door de standaardlaag, wat de namen doet 'verdwijnen' daaruit.

Misschien is het een pragmatische oplossing om alleen het landuse=residential gedeelte de naam te geven, en niet de landuse=retail ernaast. Dat werkt alleen niet als die landuse-blokken nog fijner ingetekend worden (geen vereiste natuurlijk, maar wel mogelijk).

De mooiste langetermijnoplossing is om place=city_block met een name-tag ook gerenderd te krijgen in de standaardlaag, maar dat is een moeizaam traject (niet onmogelijk trouwens, maar wel lastig).
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
chnav (2018-11-29 19:51:00+00:00): Здравствуйте, пожалуйста не пишите в поле name всякие глупости. Тут серьёзный проект, отнеситесь с уважением. Спасибо.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
awesm (2019-01-23 06:42:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66557476 where the changeset comment is: revert pointless/careless edits based on imagery around Lyttelton, New Zealand
SANDHYARANI (2019-01-23 09:05:55+00:00): I apologies for the mistake happened during copy pasting my comments (a list that i internally maintaining), i will be more vigilant for this kind of mistakes in future however the intent of the edit is correct. 

Modified road geometry according to aerial imagery,Please review and revert back if i need to re insist the edit on the map.


Thanks for your help and advice.
Sandhyarani
maro21 (2018-12-01 09:48:38+00:00): dzięki :)
mavl (2018-12-24 23:42:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-12-28 12:39:43+00:00): Você transformou a via GO-338 em rural, ela não é rural, por favor, cuidado com essas edições.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
maro21 (2018-12-01 09:48:47+00:00): dzięki :)
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
awesm (2019-01-23 06:41:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66557476 where the changeset comment is: revert pointless/careless edits based on imagery around Lyttelton, New Zealand
SANDHYARANI (2019-01-23 08:56:43+00:00): I apologies for the mistake happened during copy pasting my comments (a list that i internally maintaining), i will be more vigilant for this kind of mistakes in future however the intent of the edit is correct. 

Modified road geometry according to aerial imagery,Unglued a polygon and a road segment which were joined incorrectly.,Please review and revert back if i need to re insist the edit on the map.


Thanks for your help and advice.
Sandhyarani
awesm (2019-01-23 09:13:20+00:00): These comments are automatic from the revert tool. Can you be more specific about which geometries and glued polygons you are talking about here? I will take a look.

If you are specific and detailed in your original changeset comments then I am less likely to revert changes.

I appreciate the changes to align geometry  but it is my intention to align everything as I update the map in this area over the next few months.

Thanks!
apm-wa (2019-03-08 13:03:07+00:00): Claudius, what does "choil" on the road refer to?
Claudius Henrichs (2019-06-11 08:23:30+00:00): I have no idea. It was a name already tagged on the road and since I was only working to fix geometry errors and I couldn't tell or disprove that's a correct name I simply left it untouched.
sergeybe (2018-11-29 18:13:32+00:00): Не позорьте свою страну. Не занимайтесь вандализмом.
gurglypipe (2018-11-29 22:45:45+00:00): A suggestion: it’s hard for others to piece together the overall picture of your edits (for review) if it’s split into a lot of tiny edits. Would you mind combining all your related edits into single changesets? For example, one changeset to fix up all the bridleways/tracks/MTB routes around Grizedale. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65019765
Mark Edmonds (2018-11-30 16:29:31+00:00): Thanks for the advice :) I'm new to editing so wasn't sure of the best methodology. The tutorial of the iD editor just said to save often, so I did! In future I'll try to combine edits for an area into a single changeset.
gurglypipe (2018-11-30 16:31:19+00:00): No worries, thanks for your edits and responsiveness! I would interpret that tutorial as meaning you shouldn’t keep the editor open for days, working on unrelated changes all over the map. :-)
freebeer (2018-11-30 17:05:09+00:00): Nitpicker alert:

No worries about keeping the editor open for days; after a length of time (20 hours?  24 hours?  don't ask how i know this) the changeset will be automagically closed, just as it will be closed after an hour of inactivity.

Saving with my potlatch 2 editor is a bit different, as i can work for hours to create a boatload of local changes in a limited area, then after sleeping, awake in order to upload the changes and continue working, only to find out the editor stroke browser crashed or was killed and my hours of work were all for nowt (don't ask how many times that happened to me to finally have given up on that idea of getting Top OSM Contrib Rankness).

Instead i used to edit taking the tutorial advice of saving regularly, with the twist that my editor does not automagically close the changeset for each `s'ave, rather, i need to manually `c'lose the changeset before i turn my interest elsewhere, but until then it's all one monster changeset.  unless i forget to watch the clock and the witching 3600 seconds passes and i start a new changeset, and can no longer skew the average potlatch edit size stats in the eternal editor wars.

i don't know if it is possible to change your iD default if you like so you can do a large edit in a small area of osm whitespace, regularly saving to avoid data loss, but keeping all the context into one changeset for that area.

anyway, enough off-topic.  i might have to analyse the problematic lyft changesets using iD that somehow break things, to see if they can do the same, grouping the changes for one road segment into one change so i don't get lost following the chain.

:wq
^X^C
Mark Edmonds (2018-11-30 18:40:03+00:00): Thanks, I'll have to check out Potlatch 2 and the other editors as well. Didn't realise there were so many too!
rskedgell (2018-11-30 01:00:42+00:00): Strangely, LB Bromley seem unaware of the name change (see https://www.bromley.gov.uk/directory_record/1213375/bromley_hill_cemetery ). What is the source of your information?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65019858
rskedgell (2018-11-30 01:06:36+00:00): Have Queens Gardens *really* been turned into a car park? Has anyone told LB Bromley that one of their parks is missing? (see https://www.bromley.gov.uk/directory_record/1212752/queens_gardens )
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65020180
rskedgell (2018-11-30 20:55:39+00:00): Reverted.
rskedgell (2018-11-30 21:06:55+00:00): Reverted vandalism, changeset #65058076
rskedgell (2018-11-30 01:08:21+00:00): Changed from a car park to industrial land use and changed its name in less than an hours? Really?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65020251
rskedgell (2018-11-30 20:55:09+00:00): Reverted.
rskedgell (2018-11-30 01:21:06+00:00): This seems rather a large site for a primary school, even one which exists in the real world.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65020313
rskedgell (2018-11-30 20:41:57+00:00): Vandalism reverted, changeset #65057262
Hjart (2018-11-29 19:53:31+00:00): Hej
Jeg har tilladt mig yderligere at kategorisere "tagge" punktet som "læge" + tilføje deres hjemmeside
literan (2018-11-29 19:58:36+00:00): в номере должен быть пробел