piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Igor Gurzhuenko (2022-07-16 10:38:19+00:00): Если что-то знаете - вносите исправления. Для этого проект и существует. Я там был зимой, когда всё было в снегу.
mariotomo (2022-05-27 19:22:19+00:00): hola. just to make sure … you're mapping the waterway as `river` because of the volumetric flow, not because the state calls it a "río".  many things here are born as "Río" but all rivers all over the world begin as a tiny stream and get the "river" classification only a bit downstream.
AkuAnakTimur (2022-05-27 18:28:05+00:00): Also Federal Route 5 is weird... the traffic island is mostly painted and is a nightmare getting it corrected
AkuAnakTimur (2022-05-27 18:30:31+00:00): In addition, Jalan Klang - Sabak Bernam is imminent https://kartaview.org/details/2231290/8812
JeroenHoek (2022-05-28 07:52:58+00:00): military_service is prima, maar military=base klopt niet. Zie military=airfield: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:military%3Dairfield

related_law=* is ook wat vaag hier, omdat dit object geen boundary=* betreft, en omdat die wet een grens omschrijft die niet overeenkomt met de omtrek van de basis.
JeroenvanderGun (2022-05-30 17:29:18+00:00): Omdat deze vliegbasis zowel een basis als een vliegveld is, leek military=base (basis) en aeroway=aerodrome (vliegveld) mij een logische combinatie, maar wellicht is dat een kwestie van smaak. Het lijkt niet echt duidelijk besproken tijdens de goedkeuring van military=base, in tegenstelling tot military=naval_base.

related_law=* lijkt me nog steeds relevant om te vermelden ook al mappen we de grens iets beperkter. Zou een note=* bij kunnen maar als een toekomstige mapper het gaat vergelijken spreekt het verschil denk ik voor zich.
Hans Thompson (2022-05-27 22:17:09+00:00): nice edit OldDewd
flo2154 (2022-05-29 21:02:19+00:00): Das ist eindeutig `bicycle_rental=docking_station`, nicht `bicycle_rental=dropoff_point`. Siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.073417499972&lng=11.620866299972&z=17&pKey=254361229932969&focus=photo&x=0.45373768826085503&y=0.6842638044152751&zoom=0

War das ein Problem mit StreetComplete, oder einfach ein Vertipper?
Strubbl (2022-05-29 21:05:34+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, das war ein Vertipper. Ich habe das korrigiert
flo2154 (2022-05-30 07:22:27+00:00): Danke fürs Korrigieren. Ich wollte nur Sichergehen, dass bei dem neuen Quest (hab ich programmiert) nichts schiefgelaufen ist :)
cserpell (2022-05-28 23:24:00+00:00): Me llama la atención una ruta que tiene ref=D-55, nombre Ruta D-719 y official_name D-71. ¿Estará bien?
felipeeugenio (2022-05-28 23:56:46+00:00): Me tengo que haber equivocado. Cuanto tenga acceso a computador lo corrijo.
Gracias
felipeeugenio (2022-05-29 16:22:32+00:00): corregido. gracias
user_5359 (2022-05-28 14:01:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9775733900. what is the meaning of the tag Alcaldia = Alcaldia Altagracia?
porfiriopaiz (2022-05-28 18:51:03+00:00): Alcaldia should be Alcaldía, and this is meant to be the building of the local town hall.
user_5359 (2022-05-29 05:10:37+00:00): Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/598421226, https://www.osm.org/node/8034195026.
Please use for the keys explicitly British English. For more details have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
porfiriopaiz (2022-05-29 05:56:06+00:00): I know, just waiting for evermf so it gets fixed.

Otherwise, I will have to fix it myself and keep an eye on the next changes from everfm...
marczoutendijk (2022-06-11 08:06:59+00:00): Can you provide us with better changeset comments?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2022-05-31 07:59:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1064427616. What is the meaning of the tag lkan = bas? Did you mean landuse=basin?
Litawor (2022-05-31 08:36:01+00:00): Hi. Yes, you are right. Just typing mistake. Corrected to landuse=basin.
Thanks for your note.
marczoutendijk (2022-06-11 08:06:53+00:00): Can you provide us with better changeset comments?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2022-06-11 08:06:21+00:00): Can you provide us with better changeset comments?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
gurglypipe (2022-05-27 21:44:25+00:00): Heya. Are you sure about this one? The satellite imagery shows dashed white lines at the end of the service roads, which are legally equivalent to a ‘give way’ signpost.

The main reason for putting give way nodes into OSM is because they allow routing software to know where the priority is at each road junction. This allows for correct “turn left in 100m” style navigation announcements.
AndyCo (2022-05-27 22:22:24+00:00): Thanks. Yes, I expect you’re right then. My misunderstanding about the give way nodes’ purpose.
Would you mind helping me to revert please?
The junction of the byway where it meets B6261 isn’t navigable by car due to a barrier, but you can cycle that way. Not sure if that makes a difference.
A
gurglypipe (2022-05-27 22:27:05+00:00): You can use http://revert.osmz.ru/ to revert any changeset — just input the changeset number and a message listing the changeset number and why it’s being reverted.

Once it’s reverted (the tool normally takes a couple of minutes), it sounds like that byway will need a barrier node adding just south of the give way. You’ll probably want to tag it with:
barrier=bollard
motor_vehicle=no
bicycle=yes
foot=yes

or something like that, depending on whether it’s actually a bollard or some other kind of barrier :)
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-12-02 11:34:47+00:00): Er du sikker på at der lyssignaler ved 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9383885893#map=19/57.72337/10.58998
?

Der er ikke noget på Mapillary fra fra 2018 og jeg kan heller ikke hverken stoplinier eller lyssignaler på SDFE.
osmviborg (2022-12-02 14:31:21+00:00): Du har sikkert ret.
osmviborg (2022-12-02 15:12:00+00:00): Slettet
starsep (2022-06-01 19:54:48+00:00): Na orto ta ścieżka jest widoczna. Dlaczego została usunięta?
sawes05 (2022-06-10 19:46:40+00:00): Byłem tam rowerem i jej nie ma. Zarośnięte pole, stoi płot.
user_5359 (2022-05-28 13:48:25+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on the new version of http://www.osm.org/way/1064424763/history. I correct a copy & paste error.
eggie (2022-05-27 20:09:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Zeker weten, want vorige week stond het er nog?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
BramKragten (2022-05-27 20:51:14+00:00): Zeker weten, is inderdaad snel gegaan :-)

Bedankt voor de tips!
eggie (2022-05-27 20:58:11+00:00): Oke Top.. We blijven actueel.
Gr eggie
SpatialXplora (2022-05-27 19:58:45+00:00): #globalyouthmappers;#youthmappersuniversityofjoschapter2022
Mordechai23 (2022-05-27 20:06:10+00:00): Sekretna 🤫
VA00 (2022-06-11 11:32:17+00:00): Skąd w ogóle bierzesz dane do tych edycji: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962944033 ? Przecież tam nigdy nic nie było.
eggie (2022-05-27 20:45:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip  Geef concreet aan wat je hebt veranderd 
Svp geen adressen toevoegen aan de gebouw omtrek. Er zijn al adresnodes. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-05-27 21:01:21+00:00): Scholen zijn lastig. 
De school staat toch al op de kaart op een adresnode?
Dus niet dubbel taggen. 
Veel is al goed in OSM.
Dus steeds even checken of iets nodig is. 
gr eggie
eggie (2022-05-27 20:57:39+00:00): Alle info heb ik even op een node gezet.  Voeg die even sa,en met de adresnode. Dan is het goed. Niet aan gebouwen zelf toevoegen svp.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-05-27 21:11:34+00:00): Domino`s Oldenzaal (278281049, v2)
verplaatst naar adresnode 3
eggie (2022-05-27 20:52:54+00:00): Svp geen gebouwen veranderen. Elk begin is natuurlijk moeilijk.
Kijk nooit naar de daken bij schuin genomen foto's
Daar staat niet het gebouw.
eggie (2022-05-27 20:54:31+00:00): reverted by changeset #121593515 due changing buildings. Wrong interpetation aerial imagery
eggie (2022-05-27 20:47:03+00:00): Geef svp aan wat je hebt veranderd.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-27 20:47:59+00:00): Svp geen adressen toevoegen in OSM. Er zijn  al adresnodes.
Verder de adresnodes gebruiken om zaken toe te voegen zoals bedrijven of sportclubs
mvg
eggie
meinkrafter404 (2022-05-27 20:48:36+00:00): oke
eggie (2022-05-27 20:51:23+00:00): reverted by changeset #121593439

Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-05-27 20:49:55+00:00): reverted by changeset #121593394
Je edits zijn teruggedraaid hier.

Zie feedback
5m4u9 (2022-05-29 00:13:08+00:00): hola Rosario, genial que añadas negocios pero algunos ya existían, lo ideal es que solo haya un punto (nodo) por negocio.
SomeoneElse (2022-12-26 13:16:11+00:00): What logic did you use to "Convert large pitches into recreation grounds"?  It sounds very much like a mechanical edit that should be reverted, unless you checked each feature and made sure that it really wasn't a pitch, but was something else.
DaveF (2022-12-26 15:49:09+00:00): Once again you make ill informed knee-jerk accusations against me, without checking the data to justify your ignorant claims.

I am making records of all of them for future reference.
SomeoneElse (2022-12-26 15:52:28+00:00): Actually it was checking the data that got me to this changeset :)
Can you explain what you actually did?
DaveF (2022-12-26 16:47:39+00:00): * The changeset was open for over an hour, so clearly not automated.
* The changeset performed more than one operation on multiple objects, very rare for mechanical edits (auto or otherwise)
* The changeset is using the software provided including built in features, to it's fullest extent.
* The changeset is knowingly & intentionally restricted to not cross borders, bodies of water or continents 
* What amended objects have reduced the quality of the OSM database?
SomeoneElse (2022-12-26 23:30:50+00:00): > What amended objects have reduced the quality of the OSM database? 

The immediate one I spotted was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312307713 .  Previously it was "leisure=pitch; sport=rugby_union".  The extent of the rugby pitch was mapped by me from the Bing imagery the day before your changeset here, based on a survey earlier in the month.  Even if you thought the imagery was unclear it's pretty obviously a rugby pitch - it's named after Laurence Dallaglio who's a famous alumnus and went on to much success with in English rugby (even if he allegedly, as the pub story goes, struggled to get in the first team at Ampleforth!)

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1pqG shows that you introduced a unique tag combination in this edit.

I asked "Can you explain what you actually did?".  You replied "The changeset was open for over an hour ... restricted to not cross borders, bodies of water or continents", none of which answered the question, so:

Can you explain what you actually did?
DaveF (2023-01-09 14:21:24+00:00): "The immediate one I spotted"

Great. Why didn't you say that in the first place? I would have concurred & fixed it.
SomeoneElse (2023-01-13 09:05:14+00:00): ... because the problems that I happen to have spotted locally to me are likely not the totality of the problems in these changes.  
Another one was https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121715813/history (I see you've changed that now to recreation_ground - that makes more sense, although most of that shape really is pitch, regardless of the shape (just look at the way that it's mown).
There will surely be others though...
MxxCon (2022-05-28 01:43:33+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "crossing=marked" tag intended to crosswalks with STOP sign. Crosswalks controlled by traffic lights should be tagged with "crossing=traffic_signals". 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121594490
eggie (2022-05-28 05:26:57+00:00): De rotonde heb ik nu definitief uitgelijnd conform Sat dataportaal en BGT omtrekgericht. Die ligt dus nu goed.
MVG
eggie
SpatialXplora (2022-05-27 23:08:10+00:00): #globalyouthmappers;#youthmappersuniversityofjoschapter2022
eggie (2022-05-28 04:54:48+00:00): Dag DEYB
Dit is de huidige situatie op 15 mei j.l.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=28-05-2021&loc=51.10756%2C5.862719%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-05-15&acqid=20220515_105139_SV1-03&sensor=SuperView-1

Is de bocht in de diepstraat  Diepstraat nu al werkelijk verdwenen? .. en kun je daar momenteel niet rijden?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-28 05:15:22+00:00): De nieuwe rotonde heb ik nu weer uitgelijnd mbv de Transsparant BGT omtrekgericht. Zo lopen momenteel de wegen ook.
Liever daar niets aan veranderen. 
Je gebruikt een verouderde luchtfoto. Beter nu niets meer aan de rotonde veranderen.
De routering van het fietspad op de rotonde heb ik hersteld.


MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-28 05:22:09+00:00): Hier wat leesvoer om meer recentere lagen te gebruiken
BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg
user_15629788 (2022-05-28 13:35:01+00:00): Bedankt voor het leesvoer! De weg is helemaal gereed, ik vermoed dat de weg volgende week opent. De T splitsing Diepstraat-Groenserkampweg heeft nog geen aansluiting op de weg richting het zuiden, die wordt volledig afgesloten voor doorgaand verkeer. Er is nu wel een tijdelijke doorsteek voor motorvoertuigen van de Aasterbergerweg naar de cul-de-sac op het Vrijthof
user_15629788 (2022-05-28 13:36:22+00:00): Deze weg/bocht is trouwens al enkele maanden afgesloten voor de bouw van de splitsing t.h.v. Diepstraat 3B/C
eggie (2022-05-28 13:39:55+00:00): Oke...  We blijven actueel!

Dat verhaal over die achtergronden werkt icm met de betere editor JOSM. Dis nog wat leesvoer.. :)
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        
Groet
eggie
habi (2022-05-31 10:27:29+00:00): Ciao swix3k

I'm here because you've requested a review for this changeset.

It would have been good to have actually 'moved' the school to the new place instead of simply deleting all the relevant tags from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37748277
I reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121760605 and moved the school to its new place across the Aare in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121760975

Have a great day,
habi
swix3k (2022-05-31 17:38:25+00:00): Merci beaucoup @habi, this sounds like a perfect solution!  

Best regards, swix3k.
gscscnd (2022-05-28 13:35:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121617630
5m4u9 (2022-05-29 00:37:34+00:00): Hola, gracias por añadir los negocios y el nombre del sendero
ottwiz (2022-05-27 22:08:52+00:00): I also did tagging changes at a parking lot
eggie (2022-05-28 04:40:52+00:00): Dag L E.. Je vraagt feedback.. house heb ik alleen even aangepast naar residential.

MVG
eggie
mueschel (2022-06-04 08:19:08+00:00): Hi,
I don't think we need to use -fonipa in name tags - name:pronunciation is already defined to be the IPA transcription of a name and can be combined with multi-lingual names like name:en:pronunciation.
Minh Nguyen (2022-06-04 19:59:05+00:00): I mostly agree and have been pretty active in promoting that tagging scheme. However, I figured it wouldn’t hurt to humor the mapper(s) who suggested the more standards-compliant en-fonipa code on the wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:pronunciation#Possible_synonyms If history had played out differently and I knew about the fonipa language subtag a few years ago, I would’ve chosen it instead and we wouldn’t even be talking about the :pronunciation subkey that seems to be surprising to various editors. 🤷‍♂️ But I don’t really have plans to do much with this redundant syntax.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:37:03+00:00): No abrevie.
Redoct878 (2022-05-27 22:55:38+00:00): bruh
user4816003805 (2022-06-26 07:13:24+00:00): Hi Redoct878,

A few of the nodes you deleted had address information attached to them (e.g. https://osm.org/node/6701950550/history).
Are these stores now vacant?
Rather than deleting the whole node, it's usually better to tagged it as disused (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:shop).
This way, we don't lose address positions, and also mappers can be later prompted by StreetComplete to add a new shop when one appears (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/Quests#cite_ref-:26_47-0).

Let me know these stores are vacant and I'll resurrect the deleted nodes.
Redoct878 (2022-06-28 05:42:44+00:00): Yeah, the businesses had to vacate a few years ago due to renovations, and have been empty since. Sorry about that.
SpatialXplora (2022-05-27 23:07:40+00:00): #globalyouthmappers;#youthmappersuniversityofjoschapter2022
SpatialXplora (2022-05-27 23:07:24+00:00): #globalyouthmappers;#youthmappersuniversityofjoschapter2022
HoloDuke (2022-06-18 14:09:53+00:00): Hallo Hill112, 

warum sind die Wege nicht mehr mit der B456 verbunden? Das sieht vor Ort ganz anders aus. Welchen Grund hat Deine Änderung?
MxxCon (2022-05-28 02:08:35+00:00): Hello.
Old Zombie Trail? Could you please provide some supporting information on this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121596362
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-29 10:28:07+00:00): Not sure why cartpaths were removed.  Theya re still present on satellite imagery and the golf course still exists.  This change has been reverted since there is no reason on why the feature(s) were deleted.
user_5359 (2022-05-30 18:19:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1022642143 (one of two ways). What is the meaning of the tag
vetted = yes
?
Sonoma Adventures & Sonoma Valley Bike Tours (2022-05-28 00:18:21+00:00): This bridge connects to fryer creek dr.  When building routes It doesn't connect and forces me to go onto Leveroni.  If you need to discuss, please connect with me . 7074814582
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-29 10:25:45+00:00): Why did you remove the holes?
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-29 10:28:52+00:00): Not sure why holes were removed. They are still present on satellite imagery and the golf course still exists. This change has been reverted since there is no reason on why the feature(s) were deleted.
KB-01 (2022-12-05 20:49:49+00:00): Why did you feel the need to add untagged lines separating the individual parking spaces here? They don't add any information to the map.
MxxCon (2022-05-28 02:11:33+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "crossing=marked" tag intended to crosswalks with STOP sign. Crosswalks controlled by traffic lights should be tagged with "crossing=traffic_signals". 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121597350
Feltault (2022-05-28 03:34:37+00:00): Wasn't aware of that distinction, thank you for pointing it out. Is the traffic_signals tag recommended at any crossing that uses traffic lights at all? Meaning marked should only be for places where there are just stop signs or no signs? I used Marked Crossing when adding these after seeing many others in the area tagged this way.
MxxCon (2022-05-28 04:02:19+00:00): Unfortunately many crosswalks are mistagged either based on incorrect understanding of those tags, based on older street configuration or they were tagged before this more detailed procedure was developed. You can read more about this tag at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
If you have any other questions, feel free to ask.
Feltault (2022-05-29 15:27:13+00:00): Thank you! I will look into getting those adjusted.
akadouri (2022-05-31 21:30:27+00:00): Hello, I'm not quite sure a tree line is the best way to map the trees in those back yards. There isn't exactly a straight line of trees there.
jrh31990 (2022-05-31 23:02:52+00:00): oh ok, I see your point there. I`ll take that into account the next time I do a tree line.
user_5359 (2022-05-30 17:55:59+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9776169170 (one of four objects). What is the meaning of the tag 
Title = Rastriya Banijya Bank Limited
?
Anil Basnet (2022-05-31 14:38:07+00:00): CORRECTED TAGGING, replaced 'Title' by 'name'.
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-29 10:30:02+00:00): Not sure why cartpaths were removed. Theya re still present on satellite imagery and the golf course still exists. This change has been reverted since there is no reason on why the feature(s) were deleted.
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-29 10:30:20+00:00): Not sure why cartpaths were removed. Theya re still present on satellite imagery and the golf course still exists. This change has been reverted since there is no reason on why the feature(s) were deleted.
user_8101879 (2022-05-28 13:55:07+00:00): Hi,

be careful with roles : outer is only for ways, for nodes you have the choice between admin_centre and label, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary

I fixed it (relation 14191051).

Best regards
Educated_Kruff (2022-05-28 14:05:51+00:00): Thank you for the information. It must have been mistake. Thank you for fixing it.
NM$L (2022-07-07 11:01:59+00:00): The name of node "天神湾" (#9271435181) seemed wrong. It's obversly not a Tibetan name but a Chinese orignal name. "Tenjin" is the pronunciation of "天神" in Japanese. In Chinese, it's "Tianshen". But "湾", or “Wan” is correct. I'm so interested in the translator you used. xD
NM$L (2022-07-07 11:05:18+00:00): Oh well, in Japanese "湾" is also "wan". You fully use the translator from Jpn. to Eng. lol
NM$L (2022-07-07 11:16:44+00:00): And I think, if there's no sorce showing the English name, you needn't use Internet translator to translate, which may make jokes. Especially for Tibet names, you should know the Tibet orignal name and use the translator.
Stalker61 (2022-06-03 17:51:40+00:00): Вот это именно для вас написано:
https://msk-nnov.rosavtodor.ru/department/ob'ekti-upravleniya/obsluzhivaemye-dorogi
http://95.79.56.121:19999/map
Это уже третий косяк, когда вы сломали федеральную трассу.
Бан схлопочете в любой момент за вандализм и фейковые данные.
Кремлёвский штурман (2022-06-04 11:21:22+00:00):  А Вы схлопочете в любой момент за угрозы бана. Недочёты и ошибками присущи каждому.
Josef73 (2022-06-19 08:05:35+00:00): Hello, can you secifiy the opening_hours ? When open and when close. Thanks
Drakcir (2022-06-20 09:23:38+00:00): Hi joset73,
The opening hours are as follows:

Mon: closed
Tue, Wed, Thu: 11:30 - 20:00
Fri: 11:30 - 02:00
Sat: 12:00 - 02:00
Sun: 12:00 - 22:00
AnonymousAlligator_JeffParishImport (2022-05-28 19:51:04+00:00): Wrong account, sorry. This isn't part of the import.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-06-06 23:04:01+00:00): What happened here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121598963
RedAuburn (2022-06-25 01:04:33+00:00): Once again, thank you for the edits, but please don't edit the landuse like that. Mapping landuse to the pavement border is standard landuse practice.
MacLondon (2022-06-26 23:20:31+00:00): Re standard landuse practice, I'd direct you towards the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use#1._Mapping_the_reality_on_the_ground: 

"For example to map the land use of a school draw the edge of the shape following the boundary of the land that is used by/available to the school; to map a residential area include land that actually belongs to the houses and their gardens/private driveways.

Land that is dedicated to the public highway (both the carriageway and the pavement/verge) is not land that is available for other uses i.e. you can't build a house on it, and so it shouldn't be mapped as such."
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-05-28 15:57:39+00:00): todas mudanças foram revertidas, você deletou várias vias!