piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
BCNorwich (2021-06-23 07:03:32+00:00): This is not a bridge, I've removed the incorrect tags.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:45:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:36:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
rthik007 (2021-06-21 03:36:16+00:00): Hi Jan Rei Gallardo,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with service road way 555015142.
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106687219
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106621090
Glassman (2021-06-20 23:39:07+00:00): #TIP: removing railway=abandoned takes away information on the trail. Can you add it back please.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106621184
geosea (2021-06-21 06:20:45+00:00): Done https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106694022
user_10360149 (2021-12-08 10:34:34+00:00): 朋友你好，你在山东农业大学南校区绘制的足球场，使用了篱笆来作为足球场的标线。这确实可以增强在OSM-Carto默认渲染中的表现力，但这是不规范的做法。
目前OSM社区尚未有对足球场喷涂标线的标签提案，因此我简单的标记为了[paint=soccer]+[soccer:paint=line]，未来改成什么，还需要看后期社区会不会对这种标签统一定义。因此我这个标注很可能不会是最后结果。
我的修正修改集为：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114696426

祝绘图愉快
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-12-08 10:36:01+00:00): 确实，如果我们需要这种美观性的标签的话，可以proposal一套，然后按照这套标签绘制全世界的球场，然后再向Carto申请在z17-z19里面渲染，这是比较好的形式。

（natural=shrubbery就是这种情况，我们在通过足够的标签来推动它的渲染）
bxl-forever (2021-06-20 11:28:44+00:00): Hello,
Never forget to set the construction tag too.
highway=construction + construction=secondary
This will allow StreetComplete and other apps to quickly reset the road once the works are complete.  Otherwise, the information about the road type (primary, secondary, residential…) is lost.
JhowieNitnek (2021-06-20 12:34:21+00:00): Thank you I didn't knew that I updated it
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:53:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:49:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
osmviborg (2021-06-19 08:54:47+00:00): Banen blev civil da Sønderborg Kaserne lukkede (2014).
eggie (2021-06-19 20:26:23+00:00): Hi Fabrizio.. Is this temporarely or is this a final solution?
Greetz,
eggie
fabzzap (2021-06-20 05:54:50+00:00): Final. The Amstelveenlijn has been inaugurated a few months ago, and the fences are uninterrupted between A.J Ernststraat and Van Nijenrodeweg.
eggie (2021-06-20 05:59:42+00:00): Okay.. thanks for response
Greetz
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:54:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SekeRob (2021-06-19 12:52:06+00:00): Hi,

Great, except some cities are very explicit in printing on the street sign Leonardo Da Vinci, where another OSM wiki writes that at conflict, the street sign rules. (The wiki has it with 'da' btw), not making a noose case out of this one though. It's like that street that has a 'Via I Maggio' at the corner ;o)
SekeRob (2021-06-19 13:14:25+00:00): BTW, someone 'verified' came in and changed Via to Viale on an address,  and left the street + 31 more addresses to lurch on that street. Osmose does not take kindly to even a 'D' versus a 'd' in a name, be it addresses or street parts, but you're surely aware.
ciao
SomeoneElse (2021-06-19 09:31:28+00:00): I've changed
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5803817/history
OK

And checked the following:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12474062
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12469931
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12461262
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11622230
OK

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11622228
OK After removing some other stragglers

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11622227
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11622218
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11622215
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11622214
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11282825
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10928787
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10926299
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10926298
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7063585
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7062710
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7058519
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7034764
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6929199
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6928939
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6928005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6166997
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5803912
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5803817
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5595242
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5537914
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5300514
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4085165
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/283732
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/278664
OK

Checking the others:
6166995
5595242
10926299
OK

Finally, checking other relations on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372440830/history
No, check
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955984584

    Relation Dunfanaghy Superintendent Registrars District (11622228) (as outer)
    Relation Dore (5537914) (as outer)
    Relation Magheraclogher ED (12469931) (as outer)
    Relation Annagary ED (6929199) (as outer)
    Relation Dunfanaghy Poor Law Union (11622227) (as outer)
    Relation Tullaghhobigly Parish (10926298) (as outer)
    Relation Gweedore Registrars District (11622230) (as outer)
    Relation Tullaghobegly (6166997) (as outer)
    Relation Annagary ED (12461262) (as outer)
    Relation Dunglow Registrars District (11622218) (as outer)
    Relation Kilmacrenan (5803912) (as outer)
    Relation Glenties Superintendent Registrars District (11622215) (as outer)
    Relation Glenties Poor Law Union (11622214) (as outer)
    Relation Magheraclogher ED (6928005) (as outer)

All these have been checked above.
osmviborg (2021-06-19 09:05:16+00:00): Det havde været bedre at tagge dem privat. Parkeringspladserne findes jo i den virkelige verden.
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 14:56:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108565276, 108568002 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mixture of edits that includes fantasy mapping and border vandalism.  Numerous attempts to engage with the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5233 et al.
philippec (2021-06-19 13:51:00+00:00): De verkeerde Mapillary.
Ik kan trouwens niet zien  dat het een zwembad is.
philippec (2021-06-19 13:55:33+00:00): Korrectie : het is wel te zien dat het een zwembad is.
Thibault Rommel (2021-06-19 15:03:46+00:00): Mijn fout: verkeerde foto genomen. Is aangepast.
philippec (2021-06-19 15:13:37+00:00): Met Imgur foto's is dat een stuk erger.
Negreheb (2021-06-19 10:02:35+00:00): Danke fürs auflösen der Note :)
Irgendwann mach ich bei den depperten Lücken auch weiter ^^
GOwin (2021-08-11 01:56:08+00:00): Hi there! Thank you for your school grounds edits in OpenStreetMap. They've been very helpful, and complements the on-going OSMaPaaralan project: https://hackmd.io/5WA7UUsbS4eEJNIz44nZBw

Your mapping style appears very similar to another contributor, https://osm.org/user/JveTheSvyr .

Do you know each other? Also, do you happen to be working with the local DepEd office, since your edits seems focused mostly on schools?

Cheers
/GOwin
aharvey (2021-07-09 02:57:25+00:00): You're really on the ball with these updates, nice work!
TheSwavu (2021-07-10 00:49:08+00:00): It had been 9 months I figured it was time to check. CAPAD 2020 came out a couple of months ago, that's taking much more work to update.
SekeRob (2021-06-19 10:59:18+00:00): Hi, 

3 crossing types, 2 in what looks like Kyev, Ukraine and 1 in san Jose, California. Be aware that if you do that ALL mappers in the bound box area between those 2 locations get to see those edits in their local history listing. Please split your edits and upload them. It's easy with StreetComplete. 

Thanks in advance for your consideration.
mishchenko (2021-06-22 04:07:40+00:00): Hi, 
I understand the problem but I could not figure out how to split these edits into two different changesets. If that's possible could you please revert this changeset for me?
SekeRob (2021-06-22 04:29:35+00:00): Hi,

Reversing only adds another big box. Though setting SC to auto report, i hit report before every locations change, it sometimes keeps edit sets open for identical types i.e. Crossing flush curb at A and same at B lands in 1 set if within a certain time frame. I just never use it beyond where I am to avoid the issue.
literan (2021-06-29 20:52:43+00:00): на местности нет никаких километровых столбиков, откачу
Jakka (2021-06-19 09:53:02+00:00): zelf verplaats
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106625006
Brian de Ford (2021-06-19 20:19:51+00:00): Oh joy, we're having the Cardigan name edit wars again.

FWIW, I'm happy with Aberteifi / Cardigan or Cardigan / Aberteifi.  However...

You've managed to swap the name:cy and name:en.  And somewhere along the way the English Wikipedia page has been discarded in place of the Welsh version.  It's possible to have both.

Try not to do more damage than you "fix."
trigpoint (2021-06-24 18:40:57+00:00): osm,org supports wikipedia:en=Cardigan and wikipedia:cy=Abertefi which I have used in various places in Wales.
eggie (2021-06-19 20:22:06+00:00): Harm Geef svp aan wat je hebt gedaan. Dat wordt op prijs gesteld door andere lokale mappers
MVG
eggie
HarmHilvers (2021-06-19 20:35:20+00:00): Wat ik heb gedaan is toch te zien in de changeset? Of bedoel je het waarom?
eggie (2021-06-19 20:40:21+00:00): De meeste mappers zien dat niet...
Je ziet alleen wat het nu is.
Dan heb je een analyse tool nodig met de voorgaande situatie en de nieuwe zoals achavi.
eggie (2021-06-19 20:41:49+00:00): Je changeset http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106625292
eggie (2021-06-19 21:12:01+00:00): Hier nog wat leesvoer over hoe je commentaar toevoegt 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Veel plezier met mappen.. 
eggie
tonyf1 (2021-10-19 11:32:57+00:00): See Changeset #112693615
pio2_122 (2021-06-19 11:13:04+00:00): Do starych nazw, zamiast tagu "alt_name", polecam użycie "old_name", ponieważ wskazuje on jednoznacznie, że jest to stara nazwa.
"alt_name" jest bardziej używane dla nazw równolegle funkcjonujących.
Florek89 (2021-06-19 11:47:00+00:00): Ok, zrozumiałem. Dzięki za wyjaśnienie. Właśnie nie byłem pewien, a w okolicy w podobnych przypadkach akurat było "alt_name".

Chociaż akurat co do "Gongoliny", to niektóre znaki drogowe wciąż wskazują na nazwę "Gągolina", ale mniejsza z tym.
tonyf1 (2021-10-19 11:27:12+00:00): See Changeset #112693313
eggie (2021-06-19 19:05:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-06-19 19:12:03+00:00): Scherp gezien.. Van het vervolg heb ik ook de wegrichting omgedraaid en oneway=yes toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
OSM118 (2021-06-20 15:05:28+00:00): Oké, bedankt!
Groeten, OSM118
SafetyIng (2021-06-20 10:10:01+00:00): Seit wann stehen an der Danzstraße "Radverkehr frei"-Schilder? Das sind reine Gehwege.....
hadhuey (2021-06-20 12:19:23+00:00): Da sind Radwege baulich angelegt. Bin da am WE erst gucken gewesen. Auf der Südseite sogar ganz neu in rot. Schilder gibt es keine. Vielleicht ist mein Kommentar da nicht eindeutig.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-06-19 19:23:12+00:00): Ciao Franco. Perdona la petulanza. Le regole di punteggiatura vogliono che l'apostrofo non abbia alcuna spaziatura. Quindi "Chiesa di Sant'Antonio Abate". Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106626269
DaveF (2021-06-20 12:18:38+00:00): Hi
Please don't remove platforms mapped as polygons which are more accurate than linear ways.
Please don't add highway tags to platforms. Their raison d'être is for people to walk on them.
Masyas (2021-06-20 08:52:44+00:00): 斗巷 大红旗路虽直通，但是是两条路的路名
Masyas (2021-06-20 08:55:26+00:00): 学校的编辑可以选择学校区域，而不是学校建筑，后面这个地图上比较难看
tonyf1 (2021-10-19 11:24:06+00:00): See Changeset #112693156
stick2 (2021-06-19 11:44:24+00:00): Not visible on aerial imagery, so I assume this is local knowlege. Possibly worth adding a "source" tag to say that.
Not rectangular... if it should be, iD has a nice fixup on the "q" key (mnemonic: "square").
To check imagery alignment in iD, hit 'b'; enable "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels"; open the Imagery Offset at the bottom, find some blue lines matching identifiable image features, and drag to shift the background image.
And, welcome!
tonyf1 (2021-11-02 10:02:00+00:00): reverted #113275087
SomeoneElse (2021-06-19 14:01:07+00:00): More Bilsdale, footpaths etc. from survey
tonyf1 (2021-10-19 11:19:38+00:00): See  Changeset #112692724
dval (2021-06-23 12:28:18+00:00): Hi, SevUral! Спасибо за внесение дополнений в карту! Но! Вы обозначили весь дом, как Красное и Белое. Правильнее было бы создать точку в пределах дома и на неё повесить это name. Поскольку это здание содержит в себе не только указанный магазин, но и квартиры и другие магазины.
ProperOwl (2021-06-19 11:45:44+00:00): The Path is actually visible on the satellite images. 
The Straight path doesn't exist anymore for a while now since the its completely overgrown.
NorthCrab (2023-01-28 02:49:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3533338

Pojawiła się notatka do twojej zmiany. Pozdrawiam!
Grzegorz_Kujawa (2023-01-28 08:17:05+00:00): Tak, widziałem. Dziękuję.
Naniosłem zmiany.
Pozdrawiam.
dval (2021-06-23 12:35:56+00:00): По поводу супермаркета. Это действительно большой магазин? Может быть лучше подобрать что-то по-проще? Есть ОСМ Вики по этому вопросу https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:shop .
wegavision (2021-08-18 13:58:05+00:00): Es macht keinen Sinn maxspeed einzutragen, wenn es diese schon in den Richtungen eingetragen sind. Entweder, diese sind falsch, oder die maxspeed ist überflüssig.
AndyB_66 (2021-06-19 12:11:46+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y1Px-j00SXU
◪ Jarv (2021-06-19 12:36:13+00:00): The roads between Isacc's Lane and Rocky Lane are better suited as highway=service rather than track since these roads serve properties & homes. Track should be used when its purpose is to access land around it such as crop fields
Fightingfifth (2021-06-19 12:43:28+00:00): Not sure I agree, highway=service generally 'service' another road; slip road, car park aisle, etc. While they're the lowest on the drop down, they aren't really a 'highway', more to connect (or service' something.

'Unmaintained Track' implies its not maintained by local authority - which these are not - but doesn't mean they're not 'proper' tracks.

Maybe 'Unclassified Road'?
◪ Jarv (2021-06-19 17:47:39+00:00): On the wiki, service should be used when it serves properties (and a few other cases like parking & laybys), such in this case these roads serve a few houses and farms as well as fields. Track should only be used when it is only access to fields. Also generally speaking "service" are paved while tracks are usually unpaved, although in some circumstances "track" may be paved.

In general for the UK, roads that are adopted and paved are unclassified and above, and unadopted roads in a rural environment are usually only service or track.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Fightingfifth (2021-06-20 18:50:56+00:00): So it rather comes down to how you and I interpret the wiki; it isn't conclusive. I'm not going to die in a ditch over it - but brown 'tracks' stand out more visually on the finished product; 'service' is very hard (almost impossible) to differentiate from 'unclassified road' - but a thin, solid, brown line is.

Moreover, there are literally miles of these not just all over Sussex - but Nationally, and in Europe. They can't all be wrongly classified.
solenoid jam (2021-06-19 12:28:33+00:00): По заметкам, уточнение трассы кабеля
Colin Smale (2021-06-19 13:06:23+00:00): FYI: Actually not strictly a typo, but an actual name change... Prior to April 2019 the Civil Parish was formally called Mogerhanger. SI 6004/2019 enacted the name change, bringing the legal name of the parish into line with the more usual spelling.
smb1001 (2021-06-19 13:22:22+00:00): Hehe. You've got to love British placenames. I'm reconciling the list of civil parishes in Wikidata with those in OSM and there's an awkward exception to everything it seems.
Colin Smale (2021-06-19 13:51:19+00:00): I actively, but informally, maintain all the admin boundaries in GB where I can... If you have any questions on the subject or you come across anything anomalous, please let me know, I'd be happy to help if I can!
smb1001 (2021-06-19 14:08:38+00:00): Thanks, yes I've spotted your excellent work over the years. The anomalies so far are either name inconsistencies, or the fact that Wikidata is behind on civil parish changes, but 51 more to investigate...
jmsbert (2022-05-01 17:11:56+00:00): Hallo kjon, 
ich habe gerade eher zufällig bemerkt, dass das Baugebiet "Neuenlande" [1] von Dir mit dem Tag "landuse=greenfield" versehen wurde. Zuvor war "landuse=construction" gesetzt. Entsprechend des englischen Wikis zu greenfield (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgreenfield) beschreibt dieses Tag mehr den rechtlichen Status für eine zukünftige Nutzung als Bauland, bei dem Bauarbeiten noch nicht stattgefunden haben. "landuse=construction" hingegen ist das passendere Tag, wenn die Bauarbeiten bereits im Gange sind, siehe (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction). Da hier bereits erste Gebäude stehen und die Straßen angelegt sind, Ich würde daher das Tag würde ich das landuse wieder in "construction" ändern. Bitte kurze Rückmeldung wie Du das siehst, Gruß aus CLP
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936909203
kjon (2022-05-04 20:01:32+00:00): gerne ändern wenn schon gebaut wird. sftn, kjon
jmsbert (2022-05-04 20:26:09+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Mache mich dann an die Anpassung, jmsbert
eggie (2021-06-19 19:20:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Nieuwe gebouwen worden periodiek  geimporteerd vanuit de BAG data. Dus niet zelf intekenen.
Je kunt het versnellen door een verzoek te doen op het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
Adresnodes komen dan mee..
Ook niet naar de daken kijken. Daar staat niet het gebouw.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-06-19 19:25:10+00:00): Even als voorbeeld hoe zoiets gaat aangevraagd
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=832895#p832895

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-20 12:19:21+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik iets gefatsoeneerd om ruimte te maken voor de parkeerstraten. Het zal wel straks vervangen worden .
gr eggie
jaap de vries (2022-01-10 13:49:18+00:00): Dag Thijs,

Ik zie nu dat je on Ootmarsum bij diverse huizen, niet overal in Ootmarsum, opritten hebt toegevoegd. Normaliter wordt dit enkel gedaan bij grote landhuizen  maar niet bij rijtjes huizen. Welke beweegreden had je hierbij?
NLthijs48 (2022-01-10 16:41:32+00:00): Mijn voornaamste reden daarvoor is het duidelijk maken aan welke kant de ingang van het gebouw zit, zonder oprit is dat vaak niet gemakkelijk te zien. Bij het intekenen van vrijliggende stoepen is het ook handig opritten in te tekenen, want dat zijn namelijk de verbindingen tussen de stoep en hoofdweg (anders kan wandelnavigatie bijvoorbeeld de weg niet oversteken). Vandaar dat veel van mijn changesets stoepen+opritten tegelijk intekenen.

Als er geen stoep tussen ligt en de huizen dicht aan de straat is het minder nuttig inderdaad.

Het is natuurlijk nogal detail werk, maar leek mij wel leuk om toe te voegen, maakt namelijk de kaart een stuk completer. Alleen het laatste stuk van deze wijk nog afmaken binnenkort :)
jaap de vries (2022-01-11 07:17:06+00:00): Ben je bekend met deze https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway?uselang=nl . Wij hebben afgesproken enkel opritten bij landhuizen zo weer te geven dus niet bij huizen.
Ingangen zijn leuk bij grote winkelcentra en bij flats.
NLthijs48 (2022-01-11 21:17:14+00:00): Ja die ken ik, maar daar staat niets over "enkel opritten bij landhuizen" toch?

Het forumdraadje dat je gedeeld hebt bij mijn andere changeset laat ook zien dat in meerdere steden stoepen+opritten ingetekent zijn op deze manier namelijk.

Het lijkt erop dat in veel steden/dorpen stoepen nog niet apart zijn ingetekent, maar dat dit wel steeds meer verschijnt als extra detailniveau. Dus wat mij betreft fijn om dat hier ook toe te voegen.
stefanct (2021-10-10 02:28:51+00:00): way 843307790 hat schon so gepasst, wie er war. der klettergarten geht über den fluss... wenn du schon "aufräumst" (und da gibt es in der gegend in der tat einiges), dann bitte mach's nicht noch schlimmer.
opendcc (2021-10-10 06:18:57+00:00): Hallo,

sorry, da waren dermassen viele Overlaps, dass der 'gewollte' Overlap nicht identifizierbar war. Wenn sowas gewollt erfasst wird, sollte man eine Note ranhängen bzw. auch den layer-Tag.

Servus Wolfgang
scdhin (2021-08-31 11:56:10+00:00): Hi, what is the source if this data because on imagery there is nothing to see? thanks
scdhin (2021-08-31 11:57:36+00:00): sorry I got the right imagery now. thanks for adding data to OSM!
Kautilya3 (2021-08-31 22:29:30+00:00): Plenty of sources can be found on the Wikipedia page that I have now linked.
hvalentim (2021-07-04 19:28:14+00:00): Deixaste o tagging do castelo numa única parte da muralha (onde deixou de ser representado). Melhorar aqui será arranjar maneira de unir as partes 3D num único objecto e aplicar a essa união o que actualmente está no POI/nodo único.

https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=39.64115&lon=-8.59182&zoom=19.6&tilt=31&rotation=77