piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JayMontana36 (2021-10-23 11:05:36+00:00): I've thought about comments before in the past, however they add a bit of clutter to the map and aren't deletable or anything once I make/finalize actual changes, they instead simply remain there (and I would end up with having hundreds if not thousands more than likely) indefinitely when compared to POIs or points which can be deleted or merged (I've more recently begun to merge and (re)use as many as I can now that I've figured/found out that that was a thing that I could do instead of deleting, and since I also have the first-hand physical experience of being present there for these particular changesets involving OSMAnd, it just makes a lot more sense for me to accumulate a few very quick (and "dirty") POIs where/when possible containing very little information (for anyone who comes across it) but enough for me to think back and remember what the physical presence experience was like for the changes that I'll make right after in regard/relation to that, especially even more so considering the fact that I am very/extremely limited when it comes to the amount of time that I (really don't) have for making notes or POIs while I am out and on the go and visiting or passing through various places and areas); I figured I would just create some very quick POIs whenever I could while I am out and on the go, and then finally only ever push/upload these whenever I am home and ready to edit so that it will not be "dirty" or "messy" for very long. With this one though, where 80% was removed/deleted, I can understand, the problem is just how do I do this far more efficiently (for myself or within my scenario) without creating irremovable clutter around the map while also not needing to spend so/too much time (more than just 15 seconds at most) to open or switch/swap between apps or to make super precise or detailed changes/notes?
MxxCon (2021-10-23 14:52:01+00:00): OSM notes can be marked as closed.

Another option is to just take photos of what you want to map. That should be even faster than typing, you don't have to rely on memory, it will probably capture even more details and photo will have gps location embedded. Then as you map each photo, delete it. 🙂
aceman444 (2022-04-01 07:22:20+00:00): Adresy nemozu byt v tvare addr:housenumber=1,3,5 a hlavne ked uz prislusne adresy pridane su a este aj presnejsie so supisnym cislom (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965229310)

Preco su tie mury okolo vsetkych budov (a bez vchodov), tam sa este neda byvat? A preco su tie mury ako "area=yes", cize su aj pod budovami? No skor sa mi javi, ze ta cela plocha je 1. poschodie spolocne pre vsetky veze. Je to tak?
DaveF (2021-10-23 23:27:15+00:00): Hi
landuse=grass is not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct.

I've flagged it as an error:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748#issuecomment-940155347
luiswoo (2021-10-22 13:33:30+00:00): Пишется не через капс "площадь Майдан"
В вики об наименованиях
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
ig4map (2021-10-22 18:30:20+00:00): Уважаемый редактор, окончание грунтовой дороги переходит в пешеходную тропинку, которая идет вдоль холма, через камни. Уклон от развилки в гору не является доступным для авто. Я лично записывал gps трек и проходил ее недавно.
Отмените пожалуйста вашу правку для Way: 279023194 или скорректируйте дорогу для соответствия рельности.
Василий НЕО (2021-10-23 00:44:03+00:00): Вы не правы, там есть дорога для авто!!!
ig4map (2021-10-23 10:16:48+00:00): Я про окончание дороги, которое вплотную к холму. Ваша правка может быть правдой, только если вы сможете проехать в гору по извилистой тропинке, где есть участок шириной на пол колеса, проходимый только пешеходом. Это последние 200м через кусты, в гору
ig4map (2021-10-23 10:20:21+00:00): Можете не беспокоиться, я сохранил вашу правку, разделив дорогу на авто и пешеходную часть
Василий НЕО (2021-10-23 16:28:08+00:00): Дело в том что под мостом есть дорога которая ведёт на дачи! Но её кто то исправил на пешеходную тропу !!! Зачем люди лезут если они не пользуются этой картой?
Василий НЕО (2021-10-23 16:30:20+00:00): Я её больше года привожу в порядок !
ig4map (2021-10-24 11:00:24+00:00): Спасибо за ваши труды! Я лично пользуюсь данными, а вы в каких целях используете и в каком ПО?
История правок https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279023194/history#map=15/48.1767/40.7970

Я совершил ошибку, продолжив грунтовую дорогу на гору, не разделив ее на две сообщающихся кривых и изменил тип на пешеходную для нового отрезка. А вы после этого вернули тег и превратили всю дорогу, включая тропинку в проезд. Так что 1:1 !
Василий НЕО (2021-10-24 21:43:55+00:00): Для просчета стоимости в такси.
Василий НЕО (2021-10-24 21:46:05+00:00): Ну и для клиентского приложения как  подкладку !
ig4map (2021-10-26 09:56:11+00:00): Ясно, тогда понятно почему вам важны автодороги. Я для прокладки пешеходных маршрутов в graphhopper использую. Вы что используете для роутинга graphhopper, osmr ?
Василий НЕО (2021-10-28 00:42:43+00:00): Наверное osmr, точно не знаю . Я не программист .
Sheila Job (2021-10-25 06:10:55+00:00): Hi Lidia, well mapped and squared building, but you have some problems here, you drew a square where it should be two and drew a large square while building is small.


Advice: draw following the design of the house not all has the square shape, zoom out when you are mapping to see better.

Thanks for mapping, please keep going
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112836050
wkdgs (2021-11-12 13:27:04+00:00): Hi,

hast du eine Quelle für deine Änderungen?

Auf den Luftbildern sind dort noch Häuser zu sehen. Es erscheint mir etwas unwahrscheinlich, dass die alle abgerissen wurden. Und im Internet konnte ich dazu nichts finden.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112836368
aceman444 (2021-11-01 20:49:49+00:00): Zdravim, ked je to platne od 1.11. netreba to do OSM davat 10 dni vopred.

A zrejme to nie je stanica (amenity=bus_station), ale len zastavka. Bolo by vhodne sa pozriet ako su znacene susedne zastavky a pouzit rovnake znacenie, nie improvizovat. Dakujem
aceman444 (2021-11-01 21:57:56+00:00): Taktiez zvykneme zachovat povodny nazov zastavky v znacke "old_name".
aceman444 (2021-11-01 22:08:28+00:00): A preco ste odstranili cast ulice "Strmý vŕšok"? Ta cesta je jasne viditelna na snimkach Ortofotomozaika SR.
filip777 (2021-11-02 08:53:56+00:00): Zdravím, vďaka za upozornenia, dodám aj staré názvy zastávok a premením tú bus_station na bus_stop. Tá ulica Strmý vŕšok - ak sa jedná o ten výbežok na sever - som zmazal omylom - upravím. S pozdravom
Wetterauer (2021-10-22 14:40:20+00:00): Bist Du da ganz sicher. Ich hätte es gemäß dieser Erklärung https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dprimary_link
genau andersherum geshen. Das Bild oben rechts zeigt eine Bundesstraße mit Ab- und Zulauf einer untergeordneten Straße und das Ganze wird als highway=primary_link bezeichnet.
FraukeLeo (2021-10-22 15:15:08+00:00): Da hast du (leider) recht – da hat ein Einzeluser seine privaten Ansichten ziemlich erfolgreich durchgedrückt. Es wird immer wieder diskutiert, wie mit links umzugehen ist (z.B. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64327 , https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=63732 , https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=715709#p715709 ). "Immer die höhere Klasse nehmen" ist keinesfalls Konsens. Aber du hast recht, das ist absolut nicht konsistent beschrieben. Daher kein Vorwurf an dich, nur mal zum Nachdenken :)
FraukeLeo (2021-10-22 15:17:09+00:00): (Sorry - vergiss den Satz mit "Vorwurf", ich dachte, du wärst derjenige, der da zuletzt dran war, und könntest das so auffassen.)
marczoutendijk (2024-12-30 15:12:46+00:00): Hi,
What is your source/reason to add an IT office at that location?
We have received a complaint about it.

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
martianfreeloader (2024-12-30 19:17:32+00:00): Hi!

That must've been an attempt to resolve 
https://www.osm.org/note/916910 and
https://www.osm.org/note/914681

Sorry for documenting this properly at the time.

I've never surveyed this place myself or verified it in any other way.
martianfreeloader (2024-12-30 19:26:37+00:00): What is the complaint about?
marczoutendijk (2024-12-30 22:32:32+00:00): There is no IT office at that location.
martianfreeloader (2024-12-31 14:43:06+00:00): Removed.
https://www.osm.org/changeset/160835932
canfe (2021-10-23 15:23:06+00:00): Non mi pare corretto fare dei changeset così grandi. Son deprecati.
rende difficile la verifica.
In più da 14 gg. devi ancora chiarire alcune domande su precedenti CS.
Jrachi (2021-10-22 19:27:27+00:00): Ciao.
In che senso "unexistant"
C'è un colle?
Viene chiamato così?
A me mi sembra di rispondere si.
adriespo (2021-10-22 19:43:14+00:00): Il Colle della Forcola c'è già sulla mappa, poco più a sud. E non esiste un colle omonimo in questa posizione. Tra l'altro c'è un doppione anche di un colle vicino, l'ho visto di sfuggita oggi,  ma non avevo tempo e ho dimenticato il toponimo.
Jrachi (2021-10-22 20:00:24+00:00): Ma non lo sai che i topografi (e la gente delle vallate) hanno poca fantasia per i nomi?
La prossima mossa sarà di eliminare tutti i Monte Rosso/Monrus/moruss/Rosso d'Ala ecc. ecc.?
O di cancellare uno dei due Alpe Giasset in vallone Pontat?
O di lasciare solo uno dei Crot sulle decine nelle valli alpine (piemontesi)

Il colle Forcola a sud è più lontano dalla cima Forcola rispetto a quello che hai cancellato. Ma questo era presente sulle IGM, secondo me perché l'originale era una biforcazione stradale, come i tanti colle "Croce xxx" niente croce cristiana solo incroci.
Insomma. Cancellaresenzachiedere all'user che lo ha inserito (uno nato tra quei monti, tra l'altro) è perlomeno brutto.
Tu ti sei basato su cosa per cancellarlo?
Guardando una mappa?
adriespo (2021-10-22 20:14:25+00:00): Senti coso, io prima o poi a te devo farti un discorso dal vivo.

Intanto, provami che esiste davvero il Colle della Forcola lì dov'era.
Jrachi (2021-10-22 20:19:19+00:00): Se mi dici dove sei ti mando qualche abitante del posto che te lo può confermare.
E "coso" lo potresti evitare sul sistema di messaggistica che tutti possono leggere.
Un minimo di educazione!

Facezie a parte.
Tu su quali dati ti sei basato per cancellarlo?
ivanbranco (2021-10-22 18:53:49+00:00): E' un'edicola votiva presumo? Esiste un tag apposito: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine
eggie (2021-10-22 14:18:33+00:00): Dag johjong..
Tip.. wanneer je gaat schuiven met nodes komt alles wat daar aan vastzit mee. Ik heb wat van de landuse hersteld en water en landuse van elkaar gescheiden.

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112837694

MVG
eggie
wkdgs (2021-11-12 13:16:32+00:00): Hi,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass jemand den Eigennamen des Parks entfernt hat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113620283

Da ich nicht aus der Nähe komme kann ich leider nicht verifizieren, ob der Park tatsächlich so heißt. Daher die Frage: Aus welcher Quelle stammt der Name "Eichhornpark"? Und ist das ein offizieller Name?

Falls das tatsächlich so ist kannst du den Namen wieder hinzufügen. Füge dann aber am besten eine Notiz (note-Tag) hinzu, in der du die Quelle beschreibst. Sonst wird der Name bald wieder entfernt.

Gruß
winkeldings
SekeRob (2021-10-22 13:16:15+00:00): Incl. attempt at mapping out some of the many cliffs in the zone.
Sheila Job (2021-10-25 06:07:39+00:00): Hi Lidia, well mapped and squared building, but you have some problems here, you drew a square where it should be two and drew a large square while building is small.
Advice: draw following the design of the house not all has the square shape, zoom out when you are mapping to see better.

Thanks for mapping, please keep going
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112837971
Arnebius (2021-10-30 16:16:23+00:00): Proszę o podanie źródła/danych na podstawie których wyrysowano przedmiotową propozycję przebiegu drogi.
maraf24 (2021-10-30 19:28:20+00:00): Tu nie ma brodu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9193220090
maraf24 (2021-10-30 19:39:46+00:00): Ta trasa to jakaś koncepcja, realizowana powoli etapami. Czyli brak jest podstaw do konkretnego przebiegu.
AndersAndersson (2021-11-03 13:58:19+00:00): If it's not a building it shall not be tagged as a building.
Please do not tag things wrong for your own personal use.
mueschel (2021-10-26 11:29:41+00:00): Hi,
could you check these buildings, one got a strange tag:
  nominatie = sloop
eggie (2021-10-26 11:59:48+00:00): Hi.. nominatie must be note= nominatie sloop. 
Almost demolished..


I will change that..
Thanks
Eggie
eggie (2021-10-26 12:07:47+00:00): done
note=demolishing in progress
ma-rt-in (2021-10-23 08:58:52+00:00): Hallo,
schau nochmal nach der POI, die Telefonnummer ist unvollständig.

vg
miregal (2021-10-23 15:43:17+00:00): Die Internetseite gibt keine Telefonnummer an, vor Ort habe ich gestern vergessen zu fragen. Ich habe Nummernstummel erstmal entfernt.
Makda (2021-10-29 17:41:33+00:00): This appears to be a mistake/vandalism  - will attempt to undo...
Makda (2021-10-29 18:19:08+00:00): restored st peters road
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-22 14:38:00+00:00): This medicines are not recycled. And changing 

trash_accepted:medicines 

to

recycling:medicines

as medicines are extremely unlikely to be recycled
BCNorwich (2021-10-25 13:55:04+00:00): Hello trigpoint (Phil I think),

I just wanted to let you know there's a lot of untagged ways in this changeset.  

Regards Bernard.
trigpoint (2021-10-25 13:58:53+00:00): Hi Bernard, it is still a work in progress.

I am planning to do more and either use and tag of remove them.

Cheers Phil
user_5359 (2021-10-28 12:11:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247846182: What is the meaning of the key gml_id?
trigpoint (2021-10-28 18:42:21+00:00): I missed that one and will remove it, it is from Land Registry opendata.
CjMalone (2021-10-28 20:25:28+00:00): Just a heads up, if you are gonna work with this dataset you need to project it properly. Aligning to it with JOSM bad projection isn't going to help.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995571275
This one specifically is about a meter out.
trigpoint (2021-10-29 13:55:51+00:00): I am aligning to Land Registry Cadestra parcels, which is about the best we have.
CjMalone (2021-10-29 20:34:19+00:00): Yeah, I made that tile server. Run dataset through ogr2ogr to fix the projection locally.

Something like: 
ogr2ogr -s_srs "+proj=tmerc +lat_0=49 +lon_0=-2 +k=0.9996012717 +x_0=400000 +y_0=-100000 +ellps=airy +units=m
+bounds=-9,49,2,61 +no_defs  +nadgrids=/home/cj/.local/share/QGIS/QGIS3/profiles/default/proj/OSTN15_NTv2_OSGBtoETRS.gsb" -t_srs EPSG:4326 "outfilename" "infilename"

If you don't have QGIS installed you can get OSTN15_NTv2_OSGBtoETRS.gsb from https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/business-government/tools-support/os-net/for-developers
MCDA (2021-10-22 20:05:12+00:00): Why did you remove the wooded area?
marczoutendijk (2021-10-23 08:00:54+00:00): MCDA: If there will be no answer from Chris_hynds, I suggest you revert the situation.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
dcapillae (2021-10-22 14:39:15+00:00): Véase: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112841400 (reañadido establecimiento)
SekeRob (2021-10-31 09:32:52+00:00): Hi,

It would be nice if you wrote a bit more than the (shouting) capitals "MODIFICA RELAZIONI" and made it like e.g. 'Modifica relazione trace D1'... then everyone knows what the relation and work was about without having to open the change set.

Question: There's a track named 'Da Serra a Passo Lanciano' but it changes half way to 'Serramonacesca Passo Lanciano'. Could this be made a uniform name,  the former Da Serra a..." seems to be the correct/better designation. This link makes a reference to the track .... a Passo Lanciano https://www.parcomajella.it/d1-da-incrocio-sentiero-spirito-d2-serramonacesca-a-passo-lanciano.htm

cheers
fabiotofy (2021-10-22 21:29:58+00:00): Più che come nome proprio dell'edificio la parte "Postazione di mitragliatrice" andrebbe messa nel campo descrizione
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112841885
Gregory UKR (2021-10-24 21:00:35+00:00): Reverted in 112921615
abakus_uploader (2021-10-22 22:32:42+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
fabiotofy (2021-10-22 21:32:02+00:00): cioè c'è un ponticello per arrivare fino a Bonzicco ? Dall'altra parte del tagliamento ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112842687
Consorzio Pro Loco Arcometa (2021-10-25 12:20:54+00:00): In realtà c'era una volta, ora non è rimasto più nulla. Solo non sapevo esattamente come indicare "guado" non trovando corrispondenze...hai dei suggerimenti? Grazie.
fabiotofy (2021-10-26 06:19:45+00:00): Altri guadi in Regione sono stati mappati come HIGHWAY:TRACK oppure come FORD=YES
WotanF (2021-11-29 20:23:08+00:00): Why have you restored a totally wrong way later deleted by the faithful Nepali mapper PraKH (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113023805) ?
cserpell (2021-10-22 23:20:21+00:00): Hola, eliminé el prefijo "Calle" del nombre de las calles.
MundoMaps (2021-10-26 17:56:02+00:00): ¡Hola, cserpell! Gracias por contactarme y por hacer los ajustes al mapa.
StefanHRT (2021-10-22 15:42:52+00:00): Hi litLizard,
Mhh, Ich hatte die überwiegend nicht nutzungspflichtigen Radwege bisher nie dort reingebracht, da der Zustand doch eher fragwürdig ist und Router gerne über separate cycleways führen. Nicht wundern, werde mir das die Tage mal anschauen, damit das Routing auch vernünftig wird. Es wäre schön, wenn Du in puncto Radwege/Radberechtigung erst einmal nicht weiter machst. VG
litLizard_ (2021-10-22 15:52:17+00:00): Berechtigter Einwand. Tatsächlich wäre es auch echt aufwendig alle Fuß- und Radwege getrennt zu mappen.
StefanHRT (2021-10-22 16:03:06+00:00): Wie gesagt, ich schaue mir das mal in Ruhe an, auch wegen der passenden Übergänge zur Straße (Hier fehlt noch was Quedlinburger/Louis-Lewin). Kann sein das ich die separaten Fuß und Radstreifen "vereine" damit das Routing auch passender ist (bin da die letzten 1 1/2 Jahre gut eingearbeitet). War sonst in Marzahn/Hellersdorf soweit durch mit den Wegen, welche auch eine Radfreigabe haben. Achso, es gibt ab und an mal getrennte Rad-/Gehwege von mir gemappt, aber da ist es auch passend (z.B. Blumberger Damm) *zwinker*
litLizard_ (2021-10-22 16:19:10+00:00): Joa mal gucken :D
StefanHRT (2021-10-22 17:36:50+00:00): Die Louis-Lewin sollte jetzt eigentlich soweit schon ergänzt sein, habe es noch etwas verlängert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112849273
litLizard_ (2021-10-22 17:42:05+00:00): Oh, so kann man das auch mappen. Wird sonst irgendwann zu unübersichtlich :D
StefanHRT (2021-10-22 17:53:52+00:00): Jepp, Die Quedlinburger / Janusz-Korczak folgt die Tage bzw. kannst gerne nach dem Schema schon einmal weiter machen und ich schaue dann anschliessend mal rüber.
martinst (2021-10-22 17:13:47+00:00): Würde building=detached (siehe OSM Wiki) das Gebäude nicht genauer beschreiben?
Drohnen-Messtechnik (2021-10-23 07:00:44+00:00): Stimmt! Ich ändere es. Danke!
fabiotofy (2021-10-22 21:35:28+00:00): Perfetto! Grazie per la modifica, questo è l'uso corretto dei TAG! Continua così, il tuo contributo sarà prezioso
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112843367
Heinz_V (2022-01-09 21:55:15+00:00): You made correction to NH927: 
 each NH is part of a relation; you should update these relations.
VLD207 (2022-01-11 14:13:34+00:00): Hi Heinz_V, I added the relations back as suggested. Thank you.
Mordechai23 (2021-10-22 15:49:52+00:00): cześć, nazywaj proszę swoje zestawy zmian

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

przy 6 latach w osm powinieneś/aś już wiedzieć, że to nie tylko dobry zwyczaj, ale i obowiązek
DressyPear4 (2021-10-22 18:18:46+00:00): Olá, elev não é tag válida, nesse caso seria
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dpeak
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112843804
DressyPear4 (2021-10-22 18:22:14+00:00): Vale ressaltar também que 'ridge' não se deve mapear como área, apenas como linha.
paas-nat (2021-11-04 20:48:15+00:00): Duas observações: a tag elevation foi usada em conjunto com a tag peak. Não entendi esta observação.

Quanto ao segundo comentário, tenho sugestões. A 1º seria reverter para as versões originais, apenas linhas com a tag=ridge, a 2º seria manter as linhas e deixar as áreas com a tag=mountain_range (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dmountain_range).
DressyPear4 (2021-11-04 21:14:36+00:00): Essas linhas
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995601704
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995601700
dentre outras não tem outra tag além de 'elev'
Para saber como ser mapeado observe essa imagem
https://ibb.co/yWhhm4C
1-ponto
2-linha
3-área
4-relação
toda página na wiki você vai encontrar, quando estão com risco vermelho é porque não convém ser usado (não vai renderizar)
paas-nat (2021-11-04 21:54:57+00:00): 1 - entendi o problema com a tag ele, foram linhas residuais que acabei não removendo. vou apagá-las.

2 - agradeço o comentário sobre a imagem. estarei mais atento a elas, irei reverter para a versão original. A tag mountain não me parece adequada
pio2_122 (2021-10-22 19:48:13+00:00): W tym miejscu nie ma żadnej wysepki na przejściu dla pieszych...
eggie (2021-10-22 15:52:56+00:00): Ein herzliches Willkommen,

Schau vielleicht mal hier nach
die 'collection_times'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:collection_times

Die Sprache in OSM ist UK-Englisch.
un in einem anderen Format.

Nicht Donnerstag :)

Gruß,
eggie
eggie (2021-10-22 16:06:26+00:00): Korrigiert.. 

Brievenbus
Van Foreestweg 37
1787BG Julianadorp
Toon route
Openingstijden en lichtingstijden
Ma t/m vrij
17:00
Geaquinto (2021-12-04 04:42:49+00:00): Altamiro, por que você mudou a classificação do acesso e a saída do Túnel Rebouças? É desaconselhável haver ligações a vias motorway a não ser motorway_link, trunk e service. Portanto, deveria continuar sendo motorway_link, por definição.
Altamiro Augusto Muniz (2021-12-05 13:20:05+00:00): Reeditado.
TomPar (2021-10-22 16:43:40+00:00): Please stop going around the world renaming buildings without any firsthand knowledge.  How do you know that this building is not named "Greenhouse"?  Please engage the local mapping community first.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112844607
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-25 08:14:04+00:00): This edit was discussed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112831483 (just leaving link as repeating discussion would not be useful)