piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
Frans S (2022-04-04 10:04:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
When you validate a task, please remove the fixme notes when the questions are solved. (here 'still buildings to be mapped '
Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
hanchao (2022-04-03 02:17:03+00:00): 为什么要删除道路名？
hanchao (2022-04-03 02:25:22+00:00): 已回退
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119251649
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-03 05:40:07+00:00): Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6308532559
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
Mashin (2022-04-03 14:25:40+00:00): Hi,
I looked at that location with the most recent imagery, but the railways are not there any more. You are probably using outdated data. I suggest using CTECO:2019 imagery or Maxar Premium.
zluuzki (2022-04-18 17:20:33+00:00): railway=abandoned (or Abandoned Railway preset) means "The track is gone, but there are still traces" E.g. Gravel, ties, embarkments, tree lines etc.
It does not mean "The track is out of service and overgrown." That would be railway=disused.
Mashin (2022-04-19 21:46:11+00:00): For embarkments, we have `embarkment=yes` or `man_made=embarkment`, for tree lines we have `natural=tree_row`, for gravel we have `surface=gravel`, etc.
conductorchris (2022-04-20 00:25:07+00:00): I meant to tag a siding as abandoned, not disused.  That was an accident.

I was at the site in person.  Evidence of the former track is there (rails under pavement, old ties in bushes, the gradient, doors on buildings, etc), but the long section is - as noted by you all - abandoned.

I do in fact have access to outdated data (railroad surveys from throughout the twentieth century).  It helps me understand what it is I'm seeing in the present.

Thanks for your help getting it right.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
DP24PH (2022-04-12 09:38:37+00:00): Unfortunately, those bypass roadways nowadays are considered trunk road due to main routing of all through traffic (incl. trucks, buses) disallowing them from going thru downtown/poblacion/bayan. Kindly revert immediately to prevent further issues.


DP24
Herman Lee (2022-04-13 02:59:31+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119645247
Herman Lee (2022-04-13 02:59:26+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119645247
Herman Lee (2022-04-13 02:59:21+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119645247
Herman Lee (2022-04-13 02:59:17+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119645247
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
Herman Lee (2022-04-13 02:59:12+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119645247
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
ivanatora (2022-04-03 14:05:32+00:00): name тагът не се ползва така. Той трябва да описва какво е името на обекта, а не какво представлява. 
Че е пицария може да се види от комбинацията amenity=restaurant + cuisine=pizza. Но как точно се казва пицарията?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:07:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:10:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
archpdx (2022-04-03 07:12:01+00:00): Hi,
It looks like you added a variety of golf features (sand traps, fairways, etc) as golf holes. The preset 'Golf Hole' should not be used for these as they have their own presets. These might not be showing up for you if you're using the 'line' option when adding features in the editor instead of 'area'.

Since you already mapped these, you can add 'area=yes' under 'Tags' when selecting a line you added in order to view the correct preset when changing the feature type. Please also remove the names from these as we don't use names to describe features:
https://wiki.osm.org/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Also, please do not overlap fairways with greens. You can read more about this here:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=golf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-04-03 06:56:57+00:00): Dag Probelnijs. Je vraagt feedback.

Beter is het om access=private te taggen.
Naast dat je access=no (algemeen)  hebt toegevoegd staat alle seasonal tagging nog steeds op de paden.
foot:conditional	permissive @ (Jun 16-Mar 14)

Klopt dat dan nog wel? 
Selecteer in de achavie link een pad en kijk nog even naar de tagging. Wat kan er weg? 

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119253034

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:09:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-04-03 07:02:44+00:00): Hoi.. 
Lijkt me oke als honden er niet mogen komen.
barrier=yes is heel algemeen. Je zou kunnen aangeven wat dit voor een type barrier is op de brug.
barrier=gate? 


MVG
eggie
Probelnijs (2022-04-08 04:37:13+00:00): Dank voor je reactie! Het is niet toegestaan het gebied over de brug in te wandelen, die barrier=yes heb ik niet zelf toegevoegd, maar stond er al in dacht ik. Er is soort hef/draai-constructie om het middelste deel van de brug omhoog te zetten.
eggie (2022-04-08 09:10:16+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk..
Gr eggie
Anisa IRM-ED (2022-12-01 07:51:20+00:00): Hi, Otaru, hope you're doing well.  I found some highways overlapping between the service road and the unclassified road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/169308705), would you mind fixing this issue (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30155/task/142668008) ? or please let me know if there's any update on this area. Thank you and happy mapping!
ivanbranco (2022-04-03 09:39:25+00:00): Hi,

as I asked you once already (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117588924), is there a reason why you delete building to redraw them instead of just adding the tags to the already existing buildings? Also the deleted one looked more precise, the buildings you're adding are unsquared, in iD you can make them squared by pressing "Q" in the keyboard.

Traduzione automatica:

Привет,

как я уже спрашивал вас однажды (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117588924), есть ли причина, по которой вы удаляете здания, чтобы перерисовать их, вместо того, чтобы просто добавить метки к уже существующим зданиям? Кроме того, удаленное здание выглядит более точным, здания, которые вы добавляете, не квадратные, в iD вы можете сделать их квадратными, нажав "Q" на клавиатуре.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:11:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
ivanatora (2022-04-03 13:57:37+00:00): За каптажи може да ползваш man_made=reservoir_covered https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dreservoir_covered
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-04 23:08:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119319346 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible.  Meaningful communication with the mapper failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5881 and previous blocks.
ivanatora (2022-04-03 13:56:19+00:00): За трафопости може да ползваш power=transformer или power=substation (но в комбинация със substation=* според вида трафопост).
abakus_uploader (2022-04-03 22:31:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
gscscnd (2022-04-03 09:52:48+00:00): Rysując chodniki popraw tagi sidewalk na drogach.
ivanbranco (2022-07-03 20:29:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1047583271/history

Ciao Andrew, 
hai taggato come highway=service alcuni pezzi di un corso d'acqua, riesci a dargli una controllata?

Buon mapping :)
Andrew Cabassa (2022-07-06 07:18:59+00:00): grazie non me ne ero accorto
eggie (2022-04-03 08:47:22+00:00): Dag NHVELDH  Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt me oke zo.  De landuse heb ik even aan laten sluiten in dit stukje dan .. net als bij de andere paden. 
Groet
eggie