piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2016-10-09 06:31:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-16 19:40:35+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
user_5359 (2016-10-09 06:30:02+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 06:28:25+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
kiaraSh-Q (2018-12-16 22:32:25+00:00): سلام 
شما توی این چنج ست برای کل محدوده ی مجتمع فرهنگیان ناحیه 2 از تگ 
building=*
استفاده کردین که این کار اشتباه هست. 
این تگ مربوط به ساختمانهاست و فقط برای ساختمانها باید استفاده بشه.
VA00 (2017-04-07 18:46:14+00:00): Linia kolejowa używana przez drezyny. Tag disused jest błędny.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 06:26:59+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 06:17:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use the language postfix to translation in other language.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 06:09:16+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Grillo (2016-10-07 07:03:31+00:00): Hej, som jag påpekat tidigare får du inte använda dig av Eniro när du mappar på Openstreetmap, varken Eniros karta eller flygbilder. Du får inte använda några källor som inte är fria eller explicit får användas på Openstreetmap.

Om du inte svarar på det här eller slutar använda dig av Eniro finns en risk att dina redigeringar återställs.
fatuus (2016-10-19 17:44:11+00:00): jag har haft eniro som referens till gps, ej som källa till redigeringar. dessa är kända av mig då jag befinner mig i området. tack för påpekandet.
fatuus (2016-10-20 06:51:11+00:00): Dessutom såg jag nu att jag använt Vespucci. Där går inte ens Eniro in. Jag har troligen. Glömt att ändra source.
Frans S (2021-10-11 15:26:42+00:00): Hello. 
Please check an object for shadows. You mapped here a few pieces of bald spots.  No traces of a roofline as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/42702473
yurasi (2016-12-01 15:43:41+00:00): Hola ansuta,
Gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que has eliminado algunos objetos que son visualizados con las imagenes satelitales de Bing. Sería bueno que reviertas ese cambio.
freebeer (2019-05-08 02:12:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70003873 where the changeset comment is: fake maps.me bogus home castles with personal info
freebeer (2019-05-19 17:01:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70415924 where the changeset comment is: fake maps.me bogus home alpine hut with personal info
scruss (2017-04-10 15:06:30+00:00): The service road may only be one way onto Kennedy Road. Please check your sources
alinan_telenav (2017-04-12 08:07:40+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for pointing this out for me. I added a missing service road and kept the oneway tag for the road up until the intersection with the service way. Is this what you meant?
scruss (2017-04-13 11:54:50+00:00): Yes, that looks right, thanks!
Peter Vojtek (2016-10-07 09:31:47+00:00): zdravim,

neviem ci ste si vsimli ze Lupciansky hrad je uz v OSM zaznaceny: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62177836

takze ak nemate nic proti, navrhujem tento vas "bodovy" hrad odstranit.
Michal Ingeli (2016-10-07 10:50:48+00:00): Zdravim, 
mate pravdu. Mapa mi ponukla len neoznaceny castle POI. Kludne moze byt zmazany.
Peter Vojtek (2016-10-07 11:01:48+00:00): hej, je skoda ze maps.me nerendruje ikonku hradu ked je to oznacene ako budova (a nie ako bod)...
mueschel (2016-10-09 10:49:00+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tagging of this relation? The three tags seem rather strange.
9 Dorpen Toertocht= 	Route 9 Dorpentocht
Schaatstocht =Schaats Toertocht
Toertocht =	9 Dorpen Toertocht

Cheers, Jan
marczoutendijk (2017-02-09 15:09:29+00:00): I removed this empty relation. It contained no members.
muralito (2016-10-10 20:14:43+00:00): What's the meaning of the first key (Norra=Västerskär) of way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25826633 ?
Timo8188 (2016-10-11 03:29:36+00:00): It's a typo. Uploaded a fix already.
RifleCamper (2016-10-07 08:06:17+00:00): #hotosm-project-2205 #hurricaneMatthew #haiti #absks
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:44:53+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse (2016-10-11 14:36:18+00:00): Hello,
If you want to add a name for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4435765790 you'll need to use a different editor, not MAPS.ME.
Best Regards,
Andy
utack (2016-10-07 10:00:48+00:00): Schau mal beim Wiki rein
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station

Es gibt ein
"monitoring:traffic=* -- Site used to monitor traffic."
utack (2016-10-07 10:01:41+00:00): Artikel gibt es auch in Deutsch sehe ich grade:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station

MfG
utack (2016-10-07 10:02:14+00:00): tower:type=monitoring - Die Messeinrichtungen befinden sich auf einem Turm oder Mast
AR88 (2016-10-07 10:22:56+00:00): Hallo,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich hab den entsprechenden Tag "tower:type=monitoring" ergänzt. Als Typ hab ich aber Sendemast weiter belassen oder ist es besser daraus einen einfachen Punkt zu machen?
utack (2016-10-07 10:24:12+00:00): Sollte schon passen
Wenn du weißt ob sie dort Verkehrsmenge oder Geräuschpegel etc messen kannst Du das evtl auch noch ergänzen.
AR88 (2016-10-07 10:26:26+00:00): Soweit ich das gesehen habe hängen da nur Kameras um evtl. Staus auf dem angrenzenden Autobahndreieck zu beobachten. Ob da aber noch weitere Einrichtungen am Mast hängen kann ich leider nicht beurteilen.
Владимир К (2016-10-11 08:22:25+00:00): Да что ж тебе мешает повесить barrier=fence на полигон самой школы? территория ведь по забору проходит. зачем рисовать еще один контур??
WKOSM (2016-10-09 12:59:41+00:00): Hallo WM-HHSHolz,
der  Knoten: Sprthalle (4434751989) und
der Knoten: Schönbuchsaal (4434651690) überlagern sich. 

Angabe von addr:*=* tags bitte nur EINMAL pro Gebäude. Mehrfachangaben werden mit dem Fehler "Doppelte Hausnummer" markiert.

Der Knoten: Sprthalle (4434751989) soll das Gebäude beschreiben, aber ein Tag
leisure=sports_centre macht OHNE building=yes keinen Sinn. Zudem ist der Tag name=Sporthalle kein Name sondern beschreibt nur was du mit leisure=sports_centre meinst.
EMPFEHLUNG: Kopiere die Tags leisure und wheelchair in das umgebende Gebäude und lösche diesen Knoten.

Knoten: Schönbuchsaal (4434651690):
EMPFEHLUNG:
Lösche die doppelten addr:*=* Tags und gleiche die wheelchair Tags mit dem Gebäude ab. Da anzunehmen ist, das es in diesem Gebäude nur einmal Sanitäranlagen gibt könnten diese hier auch entfallen.
WM-HHSHolz (2016-10-11 09:28:44+00:00): Hallo WKOSM,

vielen Dank für die Hinweise! Ich habe den Eintrag entsprechend angepasst und die Tags der beiden Nodes nun zu dem Gebäude verlegt. Ich hoffe, so ist es gut? Herzliche Grüße!
WKOSM (2016-10-14 15:32:50+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.
Da habe ich mich wohl missverständlich ausgedrückt. 
Der Knoten: Schönbuchsaal (4434651690) sollte nicht gelöscht werden.
Nur die doppelten addr: Tags in diesem Knoten. 
Da leisure und amenity in einem objekt nicht möglich sind,
habe ich den Knoten wieder eingefügt.
BCNorwich (2016-10-18 07:13:15+00:00): For your attention please. There is still a lot more duplicated ways where you have placed a new footway on top of existing highways. The whole lot should be removed as it is incorrect, (there are not two ways one atop another), and it corrupts routing software.
Morrolan (2016-10-19 19:16:09+00:00): My apologies for my ignorance - as I created this as one single line, I assumed that deleting it would remove all traces, however as you say this doesn't appear to be the case.

Please could you point me to a specific point where this is still in error (or inform me what I am looking for, i.e. how can I tell that there are 2 overlaid paths) and I will rectify this.
BCNorwich (2016-10-19 19:53:15+00:00): HI, I could now only find one long section of duplication near Kinmel Bay, I've deleted it all rather than trying to explain where it is. I think you've removed all the other sections. I noticed the duplication's as I regularly check new mapping for these problems here :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-2.40686&lat=53.09168&zoom=7&overlays=duplicate_ways
You can check for all sorts of problems there by changing the view.

I just noticed, and think you may not be aware that this path is already included in relation: Wales Coast Path (North Wales Coast) (1850847)  (please see here :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1850847#map=9/53.2767/-3.4799 ) 
Regards
Bernard
Morrolan (2016-10-20 10:36:50+00:00): Hi Bernard, many thanks for that.  I will ensure that I read the url's you sent me so that I can avoid causing more issues in the future.

The Wales Coast Path, whilst it does share some coastal distance, is a separate path from the North Wales Path which ventures inland from the coast.  However in future I will ensure that I add relations rather than double-mapping causing navigation issues.
SK53 (2016-10-07 10:33:00+00:00): Nice try, but it's in the wrong place: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320358081#map=19/51.89439/1.48253.

People doing something as geeky as OpenStreetMap can't resist this sort of thing. It's been done before!
SK53 (2020-10-03 16:25:51+00:00): Hi,

We're just having a discussion on talk-gb about no U-turns on roundabout flares. I notice you added quite a few on roundabouts along the dualled section of the A453. I have no recollection of seeing any signage forbidding such turns, which AFAIK are not forbidden in the Highway Code, and no signage is visible on Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=52.89820065391223&lng=-1.1983677208015706&z=17&pKey=yO3BF2Hj89inaFfzY8hkrg). There is a double white line which probably does make such a manoeuvre illegal, but for a different reason.

I'd be interested to know the reason for adding these because quite a few contributors have done similar things. (I know at one stage Mapbox were adding them, but most I've looked at seem to be added by volunteer contributors).

Regards,

Jerry aka SK53
user_5452 (2020-10-06 17:53:05+00:00): I add these because it seems like the right thing to do. I have added several to roundabout flares, and also to nodes where a road changes to dual carriageway.

Topologically, this is a node connected to three ways:
* a oneway=yes entering the node
* a oneway=yes leaving the node
* a oneway=no

The roundabout flare is topologically equivalent to t-junction where a two-way road meets a single one-way road.

Topologically, the roundabout flares look like a one-way road which leaves the roundabout, then rejoins it. Topologically it looks like a shortcut. The turn restriction is the only thing to distinguish this from a single one-way shortcut.

In practice various routers would treat the flares as a shortcut if the flares did not have a turn restriction:

OSRM does (last I checked) happily route off a roundabout, u-turn from exit flare to entry flare, and back on to the roundabout.  OSM will take this route in preference to waiting at any traffic lights on the roundabout.

OSMAND would give a "keep right" instruction (ie turn onto the entry flare) if you take the wrong exit off a roundabout. It sees the u-turn as a shortcut back onto the roundabout for you to take the correct exit.

It is even more stark in the single-to-dual-carriageway transition. If some other turn restriction leaves you going in the wrong direction along a dual carriageway, OSRM will happily plan a u-turn from one carriageway onto the other at the joining node.

Without a turn restriction, how would any router know any different?
RifleCamper (2016-10-07 09:05:09+00:00): added new buildings and replaced and put some existing ones in square format
andygol (2016-10-07 20:02:12+00:00): Не треба копіювати з Вікімапії !!!
Michael712 (2021-09-02 08:02:20+00:00): Hallo jeggert,
deine Änderung liegt zwar schon lange zurück, mir ist jedoch aufgefallen, dass du an einigen nodes dummy=true angegeben hast. Könntest du bitte kurz erklären, was dies bedeutet? Ich habe im wiki und auch sonstwo nichts finden können.
Viele Grüße
Michael
jeggert (2021-09-13 12:27:46+00:00): Hallo Michael,
das war wohl damals ein Fehler, der sich durch den import/transformation der Daten meinerseits eingeschlichen hatte.
Kann also gelöscht werden, Sorry für die Mühe.
Gruß Jörg
Nakaner (2016-10-07 10:25:50+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42706434.
Constable (2016-10-07 10:06:28+00:00): hey sir, thanks for your addition to the map. You have to keep in mind that the object that you added must be located somewhere else because right now it looks like your guest house is located in the middle of Via Benini.
Please move the guest house above the building that contains it.
thanks
StephaneP (2016-11-09 17:51:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Je participe à la surveillance des données des gares du réseau Transilien.
Je vois que vous avez supprimez certaines informations présentes sur le noeud de la gare.
Pourquoi avoir fait cela ?

A bientôt
hbernardi54ea4 (2016-11-10 09:09:03+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est une erreur de notre part. Nous travaillons actuellement sur une application mobile de contribution dans les gares et nous nous étions trompés de base de données... Nous avons changé pour la base de test ensuite. Nous pensions avoir rétabli le point
transilien_cartocite (2016-11-10 10:31:11+00:00): Ok, je vais corriger. Globalement c'est la même chose pour les autres contributions sous ce pseudo ?
Cette appli, c'est map ma gare ?

Au passage, mon premier commentaire était sous un mauvais pseudo, comme quoi.... :-)
transilien_cartocite (2016-11-10 14:15:17+00:00): C'est corrigé : http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43535774
hbernardi54ea4 (2016-11-10 14:55:00+00:00): Oui pour MapMaGare.
Désoler pour la gène occasionnée, on pensait vraiment avoir restaurer les modifications...
sbiribizio (2016-11-18 13:15:26+00:00): Ciao,
in questo changeset hai cancellato una power=substation di Enel tra via Saggese e via Benevento.
E' giusto? La sottostazione elettrica e' inesistente oppure e' stata eliminata per sbaglio?
MaxDragonheart (2016-11-18 13:27:55+00:00): Ciao,
no la sottostazione esiste ed è funzionante(almeno fino al 2020, c'è un progetto per la sua rimozione); erroneamente l'ho eliminata, non me ne sono minimamente accorto e ti ringrazio per la notifica. Puoi reinserirla tu?
sbiribizio (2016-11-18 13:39:39+00:00): Grazie delle info, l'ho rimessa a posto, ma senza edificato. (capannone dove stanno gli organi di misura e controllo, ecc)
user_5359 (2016-10-09 06:00:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Jakka (2016-10-07 15:32:02+00:00): Please move the node of OYYA (gofres) on the place of building instead of higway in openstreetmap thx
Jakka (2016-10-07 15:30:11+00:00): Please move the node of Pasta Presto (Pasta&Pizza Bar) on the place of building instead of higway in openstreetmap thx
chihchun (2016-12-17 15:08:48+00:00): this edit is messed up the building ...
ramyaragupathy (2016-12-17 15:32:23+00:00): Hi @chihchun, just fixed this through https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44472506. Thanks for noticing.

There seems to be lot of room for improving building footprint in this vicinity. However imagery is not helping here. Need local mappers to fix the outlines.
chihchun (2016-12-17 15:42:44+00:00): Thank you, we are having a mapping party here, let us handle it :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
user_5359 (2016-10-09 05:59:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
chnav (2016-10-09 13:18:40+00:00): Пожалуйста ничего не удаляйте пока не приобретете достаточно опыта. Центральная часть здания нарисована корректно с тегом "часть здания" и количеством этажей, отличным от основного здания. Если не знаете что это и для чего нужно - не трогайте, пожалуйста.
Merei_ast (2016-10-09 15:40:47+00:00): Сорри, не буду. не подскажите, здесь можно редактировать карту только для себя?
chnav (2016-10-09 16:22:40+00:00): Нет, здесь общая карта, любое удаление-исправление сразу доступно всем в программе редактирования, а через некоторое время в программах навигации, использующих ОСМ.  

Если нужно просто послать кому-то kbxye. ссылку на место или точку с комментарием, посмотрите openstreetmap.ru, раздел "Персональная карта"
user_5359 (2016-10-09 06:03:27+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-12 19:52:01+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:13:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:11:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
maraf24 (2016-10-08 09:27:11+00:00): Cześć:)
Prawidłowy schemat adresowanie dla tej miejscowości to:
addr:place=Konieczki
addr:postcode=42-140
addr:housenumber=<numer>

Wszystkie 3 tagu są niezbędne. 
Adres pocztowy z tego względu, że jest jeszcze druga wieś w Polsce o takiej nazwie.
Wpisanie nazwy ulicy jest błedem, bo tutaj nie ma nazw ulic (co można sprawdzić na http://www.stat.gov.pl/broker/access/index.jspa).
W edytorze iD ma wadę - nie można łatwo wpisać wartości addr:place, trzeba wchodzić w edycję zaawansowaną,gdzie są widoczne wszystkie tagi.
Jeśli nie wpiszesz nic do addr;place, to za jakiś czas ktoś to poprawi. Sprawdzanie poprawności adresacji odbywa się co godzinę.
user_5359 (2016-10-07 16:34:17+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Der Laden hat mit Sicherheit nicht am Sonntag geöffnet, selbst Samstag dürfte eine reduzierte Öffnungszeit vorliegen.
user_5359 (2016-10-07 16:36:12+00:00): Ich habe die Informationen von Deinen Knoten auf das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91302184
übertragen, weil es sonst eine Dublette ist.
user_5359 (2016-10-07 16:20:55+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Deinen Knoten Lehrerzimmer habe ich aus verschiedenen Gründen gelöscht. In Oberpleis und Umgebung gibt es bessere Ziele, die man in OSM eintragen kann.
user_5359 (2016-10-07 16:37:43+00:00): Nochmals willkommen bei OSM!  Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Punkt, die nur einen Namen besitzen sind sinnlos. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a . 

Vielleicht hilft diese Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Ddriving_school auch direkt weiter
user_5359 (2016-10-09 05:56:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node with the same address? I have move your node to these address!
glglgl (2016-10-07 11:39:10+00:00): "." ist ja kein so arg auschlussreicher Changeset-Kommentar… (nur mal so nebenbei…)
Thomas Windmüller (2016-10-07 13:11:16+00:00): Was soll man denn da hinschreiben? Ich hatte bei allen Shops die entsprechenden Namen korrigiert. Soll ich das dann dort wiederholen?
glglgl (2016-10-07 13:23:55+00:00): Am besten wäre eine Kurzbeschreibung dessen, was man getan hat, z. B. "Shop mit Namen versehen". Das reicht völlig aus, und ist gleichzeitig hilfreich, um zu verstehen, was ein bestimmter Changeset für einen Zweck hat(te).

Desweiteren wäre es hilfreich, mehrere Änderungen auf kleiner Fläche in einen Änderungssatz zu bündeln (also nur einmal Speichern klicken).

Erfahrene OSM-User verwenden übrigens Programme wie JOSM. Da hat man über einiges mehr Kontrolle als bei dem Online-Editor.

Übrigens, willkommen bei OSM :-)
user_5359 (2016-10-07 16:25:27+00:00): Erneut Willkommen bei OSM! Gebäude in Gebäuden existieren auch in der Wirklichkeit nicht (deshalb von mir gelöscht) und für Indoor Mapping fehlt noch einiges  im GaÖ.
user_5359 (2016-10-07 16:40:20+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte achte darauf, dass der Inhalt Deiner Änderung mit Deinen Kommentaren zusammenpassen.
BCNorwich (2016-10-07 14:39:52+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The node you added is untagged and in the middle of a featureless body of water. As such it adds nothing to the OSM database and should be removed.
siberiano (2017-11-20 14:41:48+00:00): Данные не чужие, а собранные нами. Удаление их из карты - вандализм. Если будете удалять - пишу админам запрос на бан.
Athalis (2016-10-08 11:38:31+00:00): Hello Boggedy,

thanks for improving the coastline with better imagery. However I noticed that the boundary multiploygon is not closed anymore: http://analyser.openstreetmap.fr/cgi-bin/index.py?relation=393320

Fixing the issue would be easy, however: I think that the boundary and coastline shouldn't share the same way. Do you agree it is better to move the boundary to a separate way?
user_5359 (2016-10-09 05:47:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I can’t find the street of your address nearby.