piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Paul Berry (2018-11-14 17:29:30+00:00): Hi again,

You seem to be turning C-roads into B-roads around Leeds.

Could I please ask why?

Regards.
_Paul_
Paul Berry (2018-11-14 17:44:28+00:00): If it's helpful, here are the road tagging guidelines for the UK:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#UK_roads
JayCBR (2018-11-14 17:58:28+00:00): i know there is an official classification as any country, but we dont need to be so strict, especially in cities..some roads are more significant than others, dont we need to show this??of course i m not talking about trunk and primary, just some tertiary roads connecting major roads and motorways
JayCBR (2018-11-14 18:00:58+00:00): leeds road network cant just rely in tertiary roads, the loop needs to be secondary, the same with major connections
Paul Berry (2018-11-14 19:43:04+00:00): Like a lot of cities Leeds quite deliberately doesn't have many classified roads within the centre because they want traffic to move around it not through it.

The Loop is an important road but it's not classified so it's "just" a tertiary road. You can infer its importance from the relation: http://osm.org/relation/4148004

I understand where you're coming from but the map has to reflect what actually there, not what you'd like to be there.

Don't worry about what the map looks like. The Standard View is just one interpretation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
JayCBR (2018-11-14 20:16:23+00:00): i know better than tagging for the renderer, i m actually doing the opposite, mapping whats on the ground..i ve been driving all around Leeds for the past 6 months, i can tell where is all the traffic..the whole idea of the loop is to keep cars out of the central commercial area, this makes it the main road of Leeds and needs to be secondary at least..if you make it tertiary, you need to make everything else residential, do you thing thats the best representation or reality??every road i made secondary has a good reason (connects A roads, motorways and the loop)

same thing about milton keynes, the roads in the grid need to be secondary, they serve the same purpose

also navigators cant give you the optimal route if all roads are tertiary, you end up using a minor street with no priority instead of better options
SomeoneElse (2018-11-15 08:53:27+00:00): @JayCBR I agree with Paul above when he says "the map has to reflect what actually there, not what you'd like to be there".  The road classification scheme in the UK isn't random - it's deliberately designed to be easy to apply.  If you think that it should be changed, the place to start lobbying for that is on the talk-gb mailing list.  Please don't just change tertiary roads to secondary because "you wish that they were secondary".
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Daat Working Group
Ernestjw (2018-11-10 20:38:00+00:00): Sorry, I pressed yes too quickly. change was that Wilheminapromenade has street lights
osmviborg (2018-11-10 20:48:30+00:00): Undlad venligst at flytte eller modificere adresse- noderne. Adresserne bliver automatisk opdateret. Hvis du mener noden er fejlplaceret, eller indholdet er forkert, så giv Næstved kommune besked.
Hb- (2023-04-06 09:47:45+00:00): Wurde aus der Abfahrt 10784602 der vordere Teil in den neuen Weg 642940944 abgespalten, um Mängel des Navigationsprogramms auszugleichen?
Andrea Musuruane (2018-11-11 17:33:33+00:00): Ciao. La sintassi usata per opening_hours è errata. Fai riferimento alla wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:opening_hours Ciao, Andrea
Parzelle13 (2018-11-11 17:26:23+00:00): Hallo, bist du sicher das die von dir geänderten Wege vom Typ=path anstatt vom Typ=track sind? Sind sie von 2 spurigen Fahrzeugen befahrbar sind es üblicherweise Tracks. Wenn nicht, ist es unsauber tracktype nicht zu entfernen. Die Tags route =* sind falsch und foot=yes bei path und track unnötig.
Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
Gruß
eggie (2018-11-11 20:41:46+00:00): Dit is een veel te groot gebied voor een paar edits. door schuiven met de kaart ontstaat vaak schade door onbedoelde verschuivingen. Niet meer doen svp.
Stationsplein 48 in R dam zal vast wel bestaan. Daar graag op bijtaggen. Anders krijg je dubbelingen.
MVG,
Eggie
renssies (2018-11-11 21:00:45+00:00): Ik ga hier voortaan op letten!
eggie (2018-11-11 21:19:27+00:00): Prima.. er is hier overigens geen schade.. veel plezier met mappen.. groet.. eggie
SomeoneElse (2018-11-14 21:05:46+00:00): Hello,
You've changed the East Lancashire Road from a primary to a trunk at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627747425/history - are you sure that's correct?  It's a while since I've been there but I didn't think it was a trunk (green signs) rather than primary (white signs).
Best Regards,
Andy
JayCBR (2018-11-14 21:56:53+00:00): every sign i ve seen is green, sabre has it as primary..and common sense, its a major road, i see no reason that section not to be primary

best regards
J
lakedistrict (2018-11-14 23:19:27+00:00): These Mapillary images were taken in July this year and both show green signs: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/VLPqbORH-pV3z7yyD1MBhQ and https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/-TqGlo7Kzu3Pq96d-QNGAg
SomeoneElse (2018-11-14 23:30:23+00:00): Actually - my mistake - that's a different bit of the East Lancs Road to what I was thinking of (you haven't modified the bit I was thinking of at all)
Mike Baggaley (2018-11-18 23:21:52+00:00): HI, in this change, New Bridge Street and part of Greengate have been changed from secondary to tertiary, but they also have ref B6182. If this is no longer the B6182, please remove the ref. If it is still the B6182, please revert the highway to secondary as per the UK tagging guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines.

Thanks,
Mike
Leo Slager (2018-11-11 01:03:38+00:00): Bij het restaurant kan het cuisine=italian dan ook verwijderd worden.
GinaroZ (2019-02-04 00:07:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6051746414 should be tourism=guest_house instead?
SomeoneElse (2019-02-05 16:35:04+00:00): Thanks - I meant tourism not amenity, indeed.
user_1749277 (2018-11-11 14:36:46+00:00): Schaut gut aus.
Einzig der Key surface:mud ist eher für Straßen gedacht als für Land. Ich habe es mal auf natural:scrub ausgebessert.
Geteilt wurde aber korrekt.
goedegazelle (2018-11-11 10:57:22+00:00): Tappunten voor kleinschalig gebruik worden getagd met "amenity=drinking_water" (de huidige tagging is geschikt voor campers etc.).

Ik heb nog even verder gezocht en "join the pipe" is de organisatie die de kranen levert en niet de naam van de kraan.

Evenmin staat "drinkwater" als naam aangegeven.
PT-53 (2018-11-11 09:09:25+00:00): Hallo joe2812,
bist Du der Nachfolger von catweazle67 ?

Fragende Grüße aus dem Südwesten
Basstoelpel (2018-11-12 09:16:59+00:00): Hallo Radler59,

es bleibt mir unverstaendlich, warum Du Adress-tags, die notwendigerweise unvollstaendig sind, an alle moeglichen Objekte pappst, die keine Postadresse haben.

Gruss,

Basstoelpel
mavl (2018-11-13 15:34:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64446777, 64444888 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: copyrighted source, damage].
user_1749277 (2018-11-11 14:27:48+00:00): Wenn du damit meinst, die Wege sind mit Fahrrad/zu Fuß begeh/fahrbar aber nicht mit dem Auto, außer der Besitzer des Weges dann ja kann man so machen!
patenthalse (2018-11-11 15:49:48+00:00): danke für das feedback. ist halt der typische asphaltierte feldweg, wie es hier unzählige gibt.
hatte wo was von einem tag "agricultural" gelesen (der tag wäre optimal).
Luzandro (2018-11-11 18:23:35+00:00): Bei solchen Wegen kannst du tracktype=grade1 (im ID-Editor unter "Typ des Wald-/Feldweges") und surface=asphalt ("Oberfläche") angeben. Gerade für Radfahrer ist diese Information sehr hilfreich, denn bei einem Track ohne weiteren Angaben ist die Spanne ziemlich groß, was und wie fahrbar das sein kann.
Luzandro (2018-11-12 18:28:06+00:00): Auf den zweiten Teil hatte ich gestern ganz vergessen: ja, motor_vehicle=agricultural ist hier wohl korrekter. Anscheinend bietet das der ID-Editor bei den Vorgabewerten nicht an und du musst es händisch eingeben. Über den Info-Button neben "Erlaubter Zugang" und den Link "Im OpenStreetMap-Wiki ansehen" kannst du dir die detaillierte Dokumentation dazu ansehen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Für den Editor JOSM gäbe es ein Plugin "RoadSigns", mit dem man sich Beschränkungen aus den Verkehrszeichen zusammenclicken kann: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/RoadSigns

Bei so kleinen lokalen Änderungen kannst du im Übrigen ruhig auf Deutsch schreiben. Normalerweise werden das so gut wie alle Beteiligten verstehen, während bei diesem Changeset-Kommentar im ersten Moment etwas unklar ist, was du damit ausdrücken wolltest.
Hb- (2019-04-09 11:17:00+00:00): Bitte prüfen: Die Hafenhubbrücke hat den Straßennamen "Wittenberger Straße" erhalten.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-22 20:43:24+00:00): Hello!

Do you still remember intended meaning of lda:criteria tag?

see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22896702/history
feta2 (2019-05-03 20:06:56+00:00): Hello Dinamik! 

I noticed a lot of link classifications were change to non-link classifications, such as here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131523100, and here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131528505, but per OSM policy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link) link classification should be used for ramps like this in order for routing engines to give proper instructions. I am curious why these changes were done. Thanks in advance for your response.
Dinamik (2019-05-04 05:44:19+00:00): Hello, feta!
They use in Russia its own road classification ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification ). Shortly, road status is not determined by physical characteristics, but is determined by road's importance in road network. 
For example, look at line https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33622031 . It is trunk, further line ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133400194 ) is primary. But where does trunk-traffic go? It goes to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27474952 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75717381 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131528505 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131528511 and, finally, connects to motorway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27474959 .
Ways, which were mentioned by you, is not small links between several roads, they provide huge trunk traffic. Trunk traffic can't accidentaly disappear, it should go somewhere.
feta2 (2019-05-07 23:30:06+00:00): Hi Dinamik!

Thanks for responding so quickly! I also agree that the roads classification should be determined by the roads importance. My interpretation of the page you linked is that highway_links at road junctions carry the same importance as their highway designation (e.g. highway=trunk_link is the same importance as highway=trunk), and that the ‘_link’ is used to indicate a physically separated turning lane. Assuming that their importance is the same, would you agree that these slip roads/ramps are best modeled as trunk_links?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27474952
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75717381
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131528505
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131528511
Dinamik (2019-05-20 03:52:44+00:00): Hi! I think, some phrases in current version may delude. _link, usually, is a small link-road between two big roads of appropriate importance. For example, there are two big roads: from point A to point B and from point C to point D. If there is a junction in some area D, a small road, going from one big road to another can exist - this is link. Also, we can often find small roads for u-turn - they are link too. We determine these links by their importance. If we have big road from point E to G via point F and big road from point F to point H, it is not the best idea to mark some part of the second road as link only because it is physically separatated. In other words, you shouldn't look at physical parameters of the road, you should just analyze car traffic on it. Ways, mentioned by you, have big trunk traffic, because they are the first (or the last) parts of trunk road from ring road (trunk) to international border.
PT-53 (2018-11-11 09:35:31+00:00): Hallo Kurt34,
an einem Gate sollten immer auch die entspr. Access-Tags eingetragen werden. Das gleiche gilt für den Weg, der hinter dem Gate liegt.
Gate: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dgate
Access: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2018-12-02 08:30:53+00:00): Hallo Kurt34,
wäre schön wenn Du das noch erledigen würdest.
Fals Du noch Fragen dazu hast, einfach einen neuen Kommentar erstellen.
Grüße
Tim Couwelier (2018-11-14 12:06:56+00:00): Your changeset was incorrect, and has already been overrulled by another local mapper. The square has recently gotten a complete makeover, where there is no longer a road in front of the church, only a local access option to garages at both ends of where the road used to be.

Please be carefull when making edits based on aerial imagery alone, and please do elaborate a bit more in your changeset comment.
gscscnd (2018-11-11 19:01:35+00:00): 1. access=private implies foot=private.
2. There already exists a building with address “Długa 26B” (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495947550). You may want to use the associatedStreet relation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet) to inform that this highway is preferred when navigating to that building.
gabro00 (2018-11-11 11:45:15+00:00): Ez alapján helyesen tagelhető
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source%3Dgeothermal
Valkai_S (2018-11-14 15:48:33+00:00): Szia és köszi szépen! 
Nem biztos, hogy az a világ legnagyobb pontatlansága, ha így és ennek jelöljük. 
A valóságban nincs itt semmiféle gőzturbina, vagy áramgfejlesztő (nem is férne be egy ilyen kis, pár méteres "sufniba") hanem egyszerűen csak a feljövő termálvizet szűrés után beengedik (pumpálják?) egy hőszigetelt vízvezetékbe. Az végigmegy a rendszeren, leadja a hőt az épületek központi hőcserélőjén (mint a távhő szolgáltatás esetén) és végül visszatér a kúthoz, ahol azt visszapréselik a föld alá, hogy újra felforrósodhasson.. 
Nincs itt: nincs semmiféle áram-, vagy gőzfejlesztés csak szivattyú, ami keringeti a vizet a rendszerben, és a szűrő. Talán még a "heatexchanger" lenne a legközelebb a valósághoz :)
gabro00 (2018-11-15 09:32:06+00:00): Igen, pontosan erre gondoltam. Az információk alapján javítottam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64520021
RicoElectrico (2018-11-11 09:59:28+00:00): Dzięki :)

Tak się zastanawiam jak zmapować tę bramę przy kościele. Samochód oprócz karawanu i biskupa ;-) nie przejedzie, ale pieszy jak najbardziej, przynajmniej przez większość doby.
Mister_of_America (2018-11-12 14:23:28+00:00): Siema. Ja myślę, że jest to zmapowane dość dobrze, chyba lepiej się nie da tego zrobić, bo ni to chodnik, ni to wjazd, piesi mogą, pojazdy nie... Patrząc na wiele miast i miasteczek Polski (nie mówiąc już o zagranicy), to i tak Gdynia wygląda nieźle w openstreetmap. Patrząc na tę okolicę, to tam jeszcze parę rzeczy wymaga zmian (np. regulacja cmentarza). Ja próbowałem zrobić ten trójkątny trawnik na placu Blachnickiego, ale niestety nie potrafię. On jest wstawiony, ale brakuje parametru, aby był widoczny na mapie. Może wiesz, jak to zrobić?
RodrigoVi (2021-01-05 09:27:45+00:00): sur node Purpan Casselardit Lardenne St Cyprien (9934233, v6) vous used "exit_to" déprecied, le prefered est "destination"
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-11-11 00:17:48+00:00): Hek kan gewijzigd worden als iemand de juiste tag weet voor het aangeven dat het hek op een 2.5 meter verhoogde muur zit. Grasvelden staan er nu nog maar er worden werkzaamheden verricht aan de straat. Voetpaden verbonden met de Loofdakstraat.
Erikdenhoogendam (2018-11-11 00:18:33+00:00): Ik zal wellicht over een maand weer kijken naar deze locatie of alles nog klopt.
Steenbuck (2018-11-11 00:55:18+00:00): Dear maphunter36,
why are you creating multipolygons even for small forested areas?
Greetings
eggie (2018-11-11 07:24:15+00:00): Wellicht beter description= gebruiken ipv name=
eggie (2018-11-11 14:33:06+00:00): aangepast.. De naam van het plein is immers niet Opstelplaats Vis verkoopwagen. Het zou anders veel te prominent renderen. 
Kijk in de wiki of er evt. nog meer mogelijkheden zijn.
Howpper (2018-11-13 06:39:04+00:00): Why did you mess up the city limits?
eggie (2018-11-11 06:30:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

*( In de regel taggen we bij op de bestaande adresnodes,, niet op de gebouwen zelf.
eggie (2018-11-11 06:38:06+00:00): Adres verwijderd. Alle info staat nu op de adresnode
andrewwiseman (2018-11-21 03:05:28+00:00): Hello, just another note, these are probably better off as residential or unclassified roads. Let me know if I can help explain more. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
andrewwiseman (2018-11-21 03:03:50+00:00): Thanks for mapping! In this case I think some of these roads are classified too high, the secondary roads should probably be tertiary or unclassified. Here are a few examples for that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_tagging_samples/urban

Also the changeset comments should describe what you are mapping, such as "adding a road" -- in this case it says creating an artwork, but I don't see any on this changeset.

Let me know if you have any questions!
andrewwiseman (2018-11-21 03:04:51+00:00): Sorry, and the orange primary roads too. Those are usually for connecting major towns or the biggest urban streets.
nevw (2018-11-11 08:54:37+00:00): I have reverted your edit due to the non existent building structures.
Please only map things that exist in real life as you are editing a publicly used map and not a childrens fantasy map.
Multi Pass (2018-11-11 09:13:08+00:00): Hi,
I noticed a lot of these are duplicates of existing place nodes. E.g.: Currie, Wickham, Upper Stowport, Bungaree, Alonnah, Steppes, Meunna etc.
TheSwavu (2018-11-11 10:53:28+00:00): They shouldn't be. I checked against what was in there already. I'll check again tomorrow. It could be that they are outside the bounding box.
TheSwavu (2018-11-11 11:09:53+00:00): Bugger, figured out what it is. If you do an Overpass query on "Tasmania" it uses the island not the state. eg: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Dzr
TheSwavu (2018-11-11 11:11:54+00:00): Reverted. I'll try again with the whole state later...
Warin61 (2018-11-16 04:49:11+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM... these roads don't seem to exist in bing ... nor in any other imagery I can see. 
? What is your source?
Cameron1981 (2018-11-16 04:53:49+00:00): HI, I live in Springridge estate.  Bing and Google take a very long time to update maps.
TheSwavu (2018-11-19 00:25:39+00:00): Looks like not all of those roads have been finished:

https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2&lat=-37.39530625168285&lng=144.9633550643921&zoom=15&preset=1-NATURAL-COLOR&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=20&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2018-05-01%7C2018-11-19&atmFilter=&showDates=true&showImage

Also there is a missing road over near Lucca Way.
Warin61 (2018-11-21 23:54:12+00:00): Hi,
Way: Berry Saltbush Drive (643019262) lays over the top of preexisting way Way: Berry Saltbush Drive (596949956). 

The preexisting way should be edited .. not simply overlayed. 
I have deleted your new way and transfered the relevant tags over. I suspect there are more duplications here.
Warin61 (2018-12-15 04:17:35+00:00): Poppy Drive the same
Rose Av the same. 

Don't over lay.
LeifRasmussen (2018-11-12 00:34:20+00:00): oneway=no can be useful in rare instances, just so that you know.  StreetComplete finds likely oneway roads without oneway=* and asks "is this road oneway?".  Removing oneway=no could possibly, in those rare instances, make StreetComplete ask the same question again.  Not really an issue, though.
Alecs01 (2018-11-11 13:42:00+00:00): Ciao, qual'è il nome della strada?
marnier (2018-11-12 10:05:48+00:00): Via Guglielmo Marconi, 20070, APpiano Gentile
Alecs01 (2018-11-12 19:29:41+00:00): Chiedevo perchè il nome lo hai tolto tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80716075/history, puoi riaggiungerlo allora
Alecs01 (2018-11-11 13:41:43+00:00): Ciao, quello non è un'unico edificio, il numero civico va mappato come un nodo sull'ingresso, mentre è sbagliato usare tags addr:* sulla strada (Via Marconi), le vie non hanno indirizzo.
marnier (2018-11-12 10:04:55+00:00): La strada non è riportata correttamente in OpenStreetMap. Il paese è APpiano Gentile. L'indirizzo è via Guglielmo Marconi, e gli edifici hanno rispettivamente i numeri 2A, 2B, 2C e 2D, ma c'è un unico ingresso. Attualmente, se cerchi via guglielmo marconi appiano gentile, il risultato non è a appiano gentile, ma ad oltrona san mamette, un comune vicino che ha lo stesso CAP.
Alecs01 (2018-11-12 19:32:59+00:00): Il primo risultato è questa strada, poi però c'è quest'altra https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363607460 che finisce ad Appiano Gentile nell'ultimo tratto prima della rotonda (il confine comunale è la linea violacea tratteggiata). Se è sbagliato il nome, puoi dividerla al confine o dove cambia nome e correggere/togliere il nome.
mavl (2018-11-11 14:04:43+00:00): Здравствуйте. Можно узнать причину перенумерации домов? Например, этот пакет правок меняет номер дома с 87 на 91.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331980422/history
SpaunIvan (2018-11-12 05:03:42+00:00): Здравствуйте, согласно кадастровой карте 87 дом на другом участке.
mavl (2018-11-12 05:13:19+00:00): Спасибо за ответ. Должен вам сказать, что вы не должны копировать информацию с других карт в OpenStreetMap. Как я понимаю этот дом имел тот номер, который был на нём написан (на его адресной таблице). Вы же просто исправили номер по кадастровой карте. Кадастровая карта может иметь ошибки и её данные не нужно копировать.  
  
OpenStreetMap содержит данные под свободной лицензией. В него нельзя копировать данные, защищенные авторским правом без разрешения правообладателей.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:FAQ  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms
mavl (2018-11-12 05:21:55+00:00): Моя ошибка: должен быть написать - (на его адресной табличке).  
  
Вы можете посетить это место и посмотреть, какой номер имеет этот дом в действительности?
SpaunIvan (2018-11-12 08:32:10+00:00): Могу сказать по своему опыту, на моем доме весить табличка номер 13, хотя по документам на участок и дом стоит номер 3, поэтому номер на доме не всегда соответствует номеру в документах.
mavl (2018-11-12 08:44:08+00:00): Я согласен, что такие ошибки бывают. Тем не менее в OpenStreetMap главным источником данных являются наблюдения на местности.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Проверяемость  
  
Поэтому адресные таблички на местности имеют приоритет. Ими пользуются местные жители и, например, почтальоны.  
  
Если вы не посещали это место, а исправили адреса домов только пользуясь кадастровой картой, то вам нужно исправить все адреса, которые вы поменяли на их прежние версии.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Хороший_стиль  
  
Что касается неправильного адреса вашего дома, то нужно обратиться к соответствующую службы (квартальный, обслуживающая компания, муниципалитет) для исправления ошибки. Также не исключено, что ошибка допущена в документах, а не в адресной табличке.
mavl (2018-11-13 08:20:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. Так как вы нарушаете условия участия, то ваш вклад будет удалён из OpenStreetMap. OpenStreetMap не может распространять данные, которые вы добавили, так как нет явного разрешения на их использование в OpenStreetMap.
mavl (2018-11-13 15:34:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64446777, 64444888 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: copyrighted source, damage].