piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mdelatorre (2020-10-14 05:14:32+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD. Oneway=no tag is depreciated.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92445240
medrano93 (2020-10-15 00:11:17+00:00): Thank you for reaching out. I did not add the oneway=no tag, I cut the road to add the name. I did not remove the oneway=no tag added by a past user because it is not necessarily wrong, just redundant. According to the wiki, "oneway=no is used to confirm that (a part of) a street is NOT a oneway street. (Use only in order to avoid mapping errors in areas where e.g. oneway streets are common, or to override defaults.)" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#oneway_.3D_no). Thank you again for reaching out.   "


Gracias por comunicarte. No agregué la etiqueta oneway = no, corté la carretera para agregar el nombre. No eliminé la etiqueta oneway = no agregada por un usuario anterior porque no es necesariamente incorrecta, solo redundante. Según la wiki, "oneway = no se usa para confirmar que (una parte de) una calle NO es una calle de un solo sentido. (Úselo solo para evitar errores de mapeo en áreas donde, por ejemplo, las calles de un solo sentido son comunes, o para anular los valores predeterminados. ) "(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway#oneway_.3D_no). Gracias nuevamente por contactarnos. "
mdelatorre (2020-10-19 14:15:57+00:00): Thank you for your answer Medrano93. The key oneway=no is discouraged. I understand that you haven't added it, but to improve the road will be great to remove it.  This combination is seldom used only in order to avoid mapping errors in areas where e.g. oneway streets are common, or to override defaults.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92445240
angys (2021-07-31 01:34:49+00:00): Hello, sila jangan mencipta POI yang mengandungi nama orang
mueschel (2020-10-17 12:21:38+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please make sure that you only use tags that are described in the Wiki or the tags that are available as presets in your editor.
If you use your own tags like 'spot', other users and apps are not able to understand it.

Thanks!
Supaplex (2020-10-15 02:02:43+00:00): 你好：
名稱應該填寫站牌名稱，而非路線名或營運商
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92445725
naveenpf (2020-10-14 09:18:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala


Please see tagging guidelines for School mapping https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Schools
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92446384
wille (2020-10-19 21:18:20+00:00): Oi William

Por que você deletou essas vias? Eu posso vê-las pela imagem de satélite.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92446399
William Turner (2020-10-20 06:46:31+00:00): Não há necessidade de criar caminhos desnecessários, o que é ter acesso direto da rodovia, aparecerá de forma diferente nas imagens do carto, então apaguei os caminhos que não são necessários de acordo com meu conhecimento, eu apaguei apenas os caminhos desnecessários, fiz edições muito valiosas para os mapas , então leve isso de maneira considerável
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92446399
naveenpf (2020-10-14 09:16:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala


Please see tagging guidelines for Kindergarten mapping
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Schools#How%20to%20map%20kindergarten
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92447851
skquinn (2020-10-14 07:17:10+00:00): This is vandalism (replacing the correct street name with rubbish data) and has been reverted.
Heinz_V (2024-02-29 08:07:31+00:00): You mapped name=unknown; This is mapping for the renderer and should be deleted. Please explain your mapping.
OdysseusAI (2024-02-29 08:16:43+00:00): This location was derived from survey of India maps, locations with names were given names others were given unknown.
naveenpf (2020-10-14 09:19:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala


Please see tagging guidelines for School mapping https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Schools
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92450085
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:08:28+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
naveenpf (2020-10-14 09:21:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92450754
bhietsch (2020-10-24 00:58:46+00:00): Hi, is there a reason that you deleted the North Country Trail relation (#880851) in this changeset? Previously, there was a parent relation that bound all of the individual relations for each state that the NCT passes through. I think it might be best to revert this changeset, let me know what you think.
Larken (2020-10-29 03:45:28+00:00): Corrected
BeKri (2020-10-14 06:59:00+00:00): Servus blumerl,
Du warst dort .... und hast was gesehen ?
Die nicht vorhandene weil erst geplante U-Bahn Station ?
Auch wenn ich dieses Projekt wohl nicht mehr erleben werde finde ich falsch die von Dir entfernten Attribute zu löschen und frage mich: warum getan ??!
Gruss derBeKri
blumerl (2020-10-14 07:11:37+00:00): Projekte, die in ein paar Jahren realisiert werden, kann man doch zum aktuellen Zeitpunkt eintragen. LG
BeKri (2020-10-15 00:01:31+00:00): Jo, kann man (wer ist DANN MAN) ...
aber wann ist (für Dich) aktuell ?
Wenn sie vermessen ?
Wenn die mim Pickel den Asphalt aufhauen ? 
Wenn sie bohren ?

UNd warum nimmst Du eine JETZT
(mehr oder wenig) aktuelle Planung
wieder zurück ?

Fakt ist , das nach JETZIGER Planung da mal die U-Bahn durchgehen soll.

Ich habe für Deine Änderung wenig bis keine Verständniss und bitte Dich
diese  zurück zu nehmen. Danke !
jahani9692 (2020-10-14 06:15:15+00:00): لطفا نام ها را اصلاح کنید
sailajc (2020-10-16 05:22:00+00:00): Hi,
Please find the appropriate comment for the changset:92452700 "Added a driveway".

Regards,
Sailajc.
naveenpf (2020-10-14 09:20:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala

Please see tagging guidelines for Kindergarten mapping https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Schools#How%20to%20map%20kindergarten
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92452780
Frans S (2020-10-15 08:57:57+00:00): Hello Vitu, This tasks has been sloppy mapped as well I corrected the part on the right side and will remove your other mappings because it takes more time to correct thes rather than they are to be mapped from scratch.
Best regards
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-14 08:20:29+00:00): Hoi Jaap. Dat hek haalt bij lange na de 1 meter niet. Meer dan peuters houdt dat hek niet tegen. Zie street view voor referentie.
jaap de vries (2020-10-14 08:24:50+00:00): Gebruik van Google Street view is niet toegestaan volgens de OSM regels. Hier staat een enkelstaafmat hek zal er 80cm van maken, zo beter?
jaap de vries (2020-10-14 08:29:26+00:00): Helaas voor je kan de hoogte  alleen in meters worden aangegeven dacht ik al, dus 1 mt blijft staan anders routeert het weer niet.,
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-14 08:32:48+00:00): Ik had gehoopt dat er mapilary foto's zouden zijn, maar blijkbaar niet. Dat hek is nog geen halve meter hoog. Wat bedoel je met "kan alleen in meters"?
jaap de vries (2020-10-14 08:57:17+00:00): De hoogte kan enkel worden aangegeven in strekkende meters.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-14 09:07:07+00:00): Volgens https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features/Units kan height=0.4 m of zelfs 40 cm ook prima ingevuld worden. Ik weet niet waar jij vandaan hebt dat alleen hele meters geaccepteerd worden.
naveenpf (2020-10-14 09:21:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala

Please see tagging guidelines for Kindergarten mapping https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Schools#How%20to%20map%20kindergarten
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92454408
Piz Pachific (2020-10-15 17:53:15+00:00): Hallo ToastHawaii

Weshalb hast du den Wikidata tag durch wikimedia_commons ersetzt? Besser wäre es gewesen, wenn du das Foto dem wikidata Eintrag hinzugefügt hättest. So geht nämlich die komplette Verknüpfung zu sämtlichen Wikidata/Wikipedia Informationen verloren. Ausser natürlich dem Bild. Aber üblicher ist es mittlerweile den zentralen Wikidata Eintrag zu verlinken, anstelle von Wikimedia Commons oder Wikipedia.

Lg
ToastHawaii (2020-10-15 20:06:02+00:00): Hallo asdf2
Hmm... ich weiss nicht was da passiert ist. Ich wollte nur den Bild Tag ergänzen...
Ich habe den wikidata Eintrag mit dem Bild ergänzt und wieder mit dem Node verlinkt.
Herzlicher Gruss ToastHawaii
Piz Pachific (2020-10-15 22:38:59+00:00): Perfekt. Besten Dank dir!
Frans S (2020-10-15 08:03:46+00:00): Hello Vitul. Thanks for mapping here 
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them. 

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
eggie (2020-10-14 07:47:10+00:00): Dag
eggie (2020-10-14 07:49:56+00:00): 2de poging
Dag Marc,

Goed dat je zaken toevoegt. 
Het pad dat onder het gebouw doorloopt  behoeft de alleen de tag covered yes. wanneer het een gangetje betreft dan tunnel=building_passage
layer=-1 hoeft niet. het is het maaiveld.
bicycle=no hoeft ook niet.
De knopen kun je aan weerszijde van het gebouw vastmaken. 
MVG,
eggie
je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92455043
eggie (2020-10-14 07:54:21+00:00): Het is dan een keuze..
of 
covered=yes
of
tunnel=building_passage

en dan alleen het gedeelte dat overdekt is.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-14 14:39:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 100992297, 100989735 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid edits, mainly in Iran, following a complaint from the community there. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4814 .
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-14 08:22:29+00:00): Hoi Jaap. Hoezo heb je die weg verwijderd? Ik weet 100% zeker dat die bestaat.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-14 14:39:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 100992297, 100989735 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid edits, mainly in Iran, following a complaint from the community there. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4814 .
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-14 08:23:25+00:00): Hier ook: waarom is die weg weg?
jaap de vries (2020-10-14 08:26:40+00:00): Hier zijn onjuiste weg types. Een oprit wordt als foutief gezien. Opritten worden gebruikt bij grote terreinen, landhuizen of andere gebouwen maar niet bij huizen in stedelijke gebieden.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-14 08:34:04+00:00): Dit is toch een best langgerekt wegdek. Is het de bedoeling dat we dat compleet negeren?
jaap de vries (2020-10-14 08:53:42+00:00): Weet je eigenlijk wel waar gaat deze naar toe gaat? Zitten de mensen die hier wonen wel te wachten op een oprit op de kaart, die notabene prive en niet openbaar en heeft eenC01 bord. Het lijkt me zeer onverstandig om dit mee te nemen
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-14 09:00:03+00:00): Ik heb deze pagina gelezen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information en er staat duidelijk "Mapping private buildings, private roads (including driveways), private parking is considered as completely acceptable. Add access=private as appropriate to roads, parkings etc." dus dat is wat ik gedaan heb. Deze weg kan hier dus prima blijven staan.
jaap de vries (2020-10-14 09:07:59+00:00): Dan zou je als eerste aan de bewoners moeten vragen of zij het eens zijn dat hun inrit met C01 bord op de kaart komt. In de gemeente Ede wegbeheerkaart is deze niet opgenomen. Succes met vragen en daarna toevoegen met de juiste tags en aangeven dat er een bord staat.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-14 09:18:39+00:00): Ik zie niet in waarom ik dat zou moeten vragen. Volgens die logica zou je dat moeten doen voor alles waar access=private van toepassing is. Ik kan me ook niet indenken hoe je dit wilt documenteren. Ik karteer gewoon wat vanaf de openbare weg en vanuit de lucht zichtbaar is en tag het netjes met access=private. Zoals die wiki pagina ook zegt, dat is compleet acceptabel.
jaap de vries (2020-10-14 09:23:36+00:00): Ik ga niet in discussie met je over het hoe en waarom, ik weet gewoon dat veel mensen het niet op prijs stellen dat mensen van osm of andere kaarten zomaar hun straatje / weg / pad / boerenpad op de kaart zetten. Er zijn daar al genoeg woorden aan vuil gemaakt. Maar ga vooral je gang, vergeet dan niet de juiste en volledigheid van alle tags. Je zal me wel vaker tegen gaan komen in gemeente Ede of in provincie Gelderland.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-14 09:33:13+00:00): In dat geval ga ik vooral mijn gang. Voel je vrij om mij te corrigeren op tags, daar leer ik immers ook van, maar geef het vooral even aan wanneer je van plan bent om iets wat ik heb toegevoegd te verwijderen. Die communicatie wordt gewaardeerd. 

Ik hoop dat je dit net zo min persoonlijk opvat als ik. Ik kijk ernaar uit om in de omgeving met je samen te blijven werken aan osm.
pantufla (2024-10-09 20:26:51+00:00): Should we leave duplicate names of these towns and residential areas? Where do we set the area of such "towns"/"villages"?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-14 14:39:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 100992297, 100989735 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid edits, mainly in Iran, following a complaint from the community there. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4814 .
GinaroZ (2020-10-14 16:03:13+00:00): This looks like a mini-roundabout to me, going by this photo from last year: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/y7eLYZ2giHIlgJcKZFFuZw - unless things have changed and the middle is no longer traversable? 

Here's the definition on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=mini%20roundabout
alex9494 (2020-10-15 12:41:27+00:00): Apologies. Got confused with a different location. Thanks for spotting the error. Have reinstated.
GinaroZ (2020-10-15 21:58:25+00:00): No worries, thanks for fixing it :)
Sto-Sto (2020-10-14 14:33:58+00:00): to nie był brak, tylko świadome działanie;  natomiast w twoim zestawie zmian brak podania właściwej ilości pasów ruchu
mueschel (2020-10-17 12:24:45+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn "sidewalk:both:max_width" und was ist der Unterschied zu "sidewalk:both:width"? Das erste Tag gibt es nirgends sonst.
Kolumdium (2020-11-02 17:14:08+00:00): Nach einiger Recherche habe ich festgestellt das es maxwidth:physical hätte sein müssen.
Es folgt dabei dem Sub-Tag-Shema wobei die maximal Breite eines Vehikels, das passieren kann, für beide Fußwege angegeben wird.
Der maxwidth:physical Tag is nicht weit verbreitet.
Wir suchen gerade im Forum nach einem Schema für ein Projekt. Es kann gerne an der Diskussion teilgenommen werden.
Der Eintrag heißt "Spezifische Breiteninformationen für Fuß- und Radwege".
BCNorwich (2020-10-15 07:00:28+00:00): Hi, You've somehow dragged the two grass areas and churchyard out of alignment. I didn't fix it so you could see what's happened. Could you look to correct it please? Any problem let me know on the comments here and I'll fix it. 

Regards Bernard.
SharpSharp (2020-10-15 08:36:18+00:00): Yes. I unintentionally moved the churchyard which dragged a whole bunch of land use features. Spotted it this morning and fixed. Thanks for commenting, I don't like making mistakes so appreciate when people take the effort to alert me to them so I can correct. Cheers Chris.
BCNorwich (2020-10-15 08:51:57+00:00): Hi Chris, Much appreciate you taking the comment in such a friendly way, some folk get a bit upset no matter how polite you try to be.

All looks good now, Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-14 14:39:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 100992297, 100989735 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid edits, mainly in Iran, following a complaint from the community there. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4814 .
limes11 (2020-10-14 09:36:48+00:00): Willkommen zu osm!

disused ist eine gute Idee, aber das gehört an den Schlüssel, nicht an den Wert, also disused:amenity=restaurant, nicht amenity=disused:restaurant.

Ich habe das mal korrigiert und die ganzen nicht mehr benötigten Werte entfernt. 

Gruss, Limes
MrMoehritz (2020-11-01 19:31:30+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!
jeslop (2020-10-14 20:37:47+00:00): Hola. No sé que problema tienes con la etiqueta pitch. Según la wiki es: La etiqueta leisure=pitch se usa para una pista o cancha de juego, un área pensada para practicar un deporte en particular, normalmente diseñada con las marcas apropiadas. Los ejemplos incluyen: pista de tenis, cancha de baloncesto, campo de fútbol, parque para juegos de bolas, pista de equitación, etc. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dpitch), lo que se aplica a este caso. Lo vuelvo a cambiar, te agradecería que si no te parece correcto lo argumentases adecuadamente. Gracias por colaborar con el poryecto.
TheXalleiro (2020-10-14 20:45:45+00:00): Si lo añades te lo agradezco, la quité sin darme cuenta. Hacía años que no editaba nada. Disculpa.
jeslop (2020-10-14 21:02:00+00:00): Ya lo añadí, no hace falta que te disculpes, perdona si ha sonado a bronca :), no era mi intención. De nuevo gracias por colaborar y anímate a seguir.
Un saludo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-14 14:39:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 100992297, 100989735 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid edits, mainly in Iran, following a complaint from the community there. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4814 .
woodpeck (2020-10-14 18:47:21+00:00): Dear Liza2711, please use good changeset comments to describe your edits. "efdgfb" is not a good changeset comment, nor are any of the others you have hitherto used. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments has an explanation of why and how. Thank you - Frederik Ramm of the OSMF DWG (Ticket#2020101310000169)
eggie (2020-10-14 09:51:11+00:00): Je hoeft het niet te verwijderen. Ik zal het even als voorbeeld toevoegen ter 'leering ende vermaeck'
Je kunt straks evt kijken. 
Je verwijdering draai ik terug.. dan is het weer jou pad en dan pas ik wat aan. 
Straks maar eens kijken hoe het rendert.
gr eggie
eggie (2020-10-14 09:52:56+00:00): typo jou..> jouw pad
eggie (2020-10-14 10:06:10+00:00): 
Done. Je pad is weer terug...  Buiten het gebouw is gewoon footway.. 
aan de zuidkant is een stuk covered=yes
(onder een deel van het gebouw) 
Aan de noordzijde is het een tunnel=building_passage (door het gebouw heen) en tot de Rijksweg is weer gewoon footway.
Dus vier delen. De overdekte delen zitten aan het gebouw vast.

Paard en fiets=no hoeft niet hier. 

gr eggie
Polarbear-repair (2020-10-16 18:37:48+00:00): Lieber bdcinside,
du löschst hier aeroway-Wege, die du drei Tage vorher selbst angelegt hast. Alles ohne Quellangabe. Ene Erläuterung ist wünschenswert. 

Viele Grüsse
Polarbear
mbethke (2020-10-21 05:33:22+00:00): Hi!
somehow road=highway seem to be a company idiom with you guys, I think I've seen that from Madushani Ganga, too ;)
highway=road would work, although "road" should only be used if the kind of road can't be determined. Here it's most likely highway=residential.

Cheers,
Matthias
LQconcern (2020-10-27 22:35:22+00:00): You’ve marked 2 private driveways as service roads. One doesn’t even go through.
100 block of Terrace Trail West....it is a dead end access road. Both driveways are marked as passable to public. You can’t get through the one service road that connects access to terrace trail west. The new owners dug out part of their driveway to make a planting area and some versalock type terracing. The other is marked private and they mean PRIVATE. Remove both. Look at google maps.
amzmkuma (2020-10-28 10:03:59+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing the edit and providing the latest information about the area. I've made changes as per your suggestion in the changeset(#93171001). Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
amzmkuma.
LQconcern (2020-10-28 15:13:28+00:00): You didn’t take the driveways out. So you are missing the point. They are NOT public roads. The driveway that connects Terrace Trail West and Access Rd is NOT passable. The owners had the property surveyed and took out all the asphalt and put in hardscape terracing and a raised berm with 3 redbud trees so that there could be no passage. It is strictly a driveway. The house owners maintain the driveway NOT Lake Quivira. Take out both lines because they are PRIVATE  driveways and not open for public use. To have lines there makes it look like they are passable and they are not. The Access Rd is so tricky that the garbage truck has to back in from true entry 10 houses to the north and back all the way down the Access Rd because there is no place to turn around or go get out.
I will walk down and take pictures if you’d like.
LQconcern (2020-10-28 15:20:16+00:00): On one map it is fixed and on other maps it is still marked. I will check back in a couple of days to see if the street map part has been changed. 
Sorry. I know it’s a hassle
LQconcern (2020-12-22 22:40:59+00:00): Thank you very much for making the corrections. When I first commented I was not expecting an answer or a change. You WOWed me. That does not happen very often. Much appreciated.
clay_c (2020-12-23 21:39:49+00:00): Hi LQconcern and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

OSM is a map that anyone can edit. Next time you have an issue with the way someone else has mapped your local area, I'd suggest trying to fix it yourself first (it's easy, no hassle). And your criticisms may be right, but it wouldn't hurt to be more constructive and positive in your critique—we're all trying to improve the map here.

As a side note, Google Maps has copyright license restrictions that make it unsuitable to use as a source for mapping things on OpenStreetMap. I know you haven't started mapping yet, but I thought I'd mention that in case you were interested in doing more improvements to your local area.

Best,

Clay
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-14 23:13:09+00:00): Hallo Jaap. Hier hebben we het over gehad. Zou je aub niet mijn werk ongedaan willen maken?