piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-01-12 17:05:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:14:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
samely (2017-01-11 22:27:32+00:00): Hi again! The same case here, can you confirm the existance of these roads? 
Thank you,
Eliane
user_5359 (2017-01-15 17:11:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:38:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
freeExec (2017-01-10 06:53:50+00:00): Что это, 50к объектов, без комментария, предлагаю откатить.
literan (2017-01-10 08:54:35+00:00): дам ссылку на форум, а то там уже и откатывать собираются (не известив, естественно): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=625955#p625955
iWowik (2017-01-10 09:14:53+00:00): сет закрылся, коммент уже не поставить было.
исправление ошибок адресации
iWowik (2017-01-10 09:25:00+00:00): собственно там откат.
Внутригородские районы из suburb вернуты в admin_level=9
А садоводства из place=subdistrict (прелестно, да?) в plаce=allotements (тут может вернее было бы neighbourhood, так как они в НП)
iWowik (2017-01-13 14:23:58+00:00): Это про Краснодар.
d1g (2017-01-30 04:45:38+00:00): Конкретно с этой правкой проблем явных не вижу, 100 объектов посмотрел случайных. 

Другие попутные правки лучше не подмешивать когда такой размах, но это уже придирка.

Лично я за удаления как-бы лишних addr:suburb тегов: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88379311/history

Не специалисту тяжело 24К объектов обновлять через iD. Контр-аргументы никогда этому никто не приводил. 

Конкретно это обсуждать по 10 раз смысла не вижу.
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:38:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
keithonearth (2017-01-11 02:05:39+00:00): Why are these two nodes tagged as tailors, but have the names of tattoo studios?
Alecs01 (2017-02-18 15:12:46+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro del nome di questo sentiero? e di quest'altro https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464675801
cyclist789 (2026-07-13 20:26:07+00:00): You've plotted some waterways here and there in northern Zealand (Sjælland), both in Stokkebjerg Skov and elsewhere.
Did you survey (source=survey) these places, or only plot them based on aerial imagery?
Would you mind if I made significant changes to these waterways?
Thue Janus Kristensen (2026-07-13 22:50:02+00:00): Some I have visited personally, some are from maps. Just go ahead and make any changes you feel are correct.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
literan (2017-01-09 13:06:35+00:00): а разве там появился отдельный проезд, отгороженный бордюрами или делиниаторами https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464678819#map=19/55.71133/37.62177 ??? Мы только в этом случае отдельные направления своими линиями обозначаем.
misht (2017-01-09 16:38:07+00:00): не,  делиниаторов нет, только разметка появилась (островок) и полосы отдельные. Показалось так логичнее, а то я там на немного "заблудился") когда ехал. Но если не по правилам, откатите.
literan (2017-01-09 20:16:25+00:00): на самом деле, по собственному опыту знаю, что если так прописывать каждое направление, с навигатором еще проще заблудиться. Ведь он обычно озвучивает ("поверните налево....") именно поворот на дорогу, проезжую часть, а так будет говорить "поверните налево" перед началом каждого такого линка...
misht (2017-01-10 06:07:44+00:00): А разве навигатор в таком случае не говорит "держитесь правее, затем держитесь левее"?
Но, вполне возможно. С другой стороны, так можно прописать движение по полосам и сразу увидеть куда перестроиться, а иначе островок разделяет разметку.
Я в принципе то не настаиваю на изменениях
literan (2017-01-10 16:17:43+00:00): в том то и дело, что обычно он так говорит, когда надо сворачивать на другую дорогу, а не когда надо свернуть на какую-то полосу. Какую полосу принять, скажем, в ОСМАНДе отображается соответствующими стрелочками - нужная горит зеленым, а ненужные - красным (или желтым?)
misht (2017-01-10 17:54:06+00:00): Так на мой взгляд в данном случае стрелочки не задать правильно, т.к. на месте ты будешь видеть 4 полосы левее, потом островок, а потом отдельно 2 полосы прямо. А если это показать одним веем, и задать на нём 6 полос, то это будет отличатся от реальности, т.к. там есть физическое разделение.
literan (2017-01-10 18:27:05+00:00): в общем, посмотрел на панорамах https://atlas.mos.ru/?lang=ru&z=9&ll=37.62147543874414%2C55.71128774572496&pa=266.3&pp=37.62147858%2C55.71128949 - оказывается, там есть физический разделитель. Тему можно считать закрытой )
misht (2017-01-10 18:39:12+00:00): О! спасибо за ссылку, не знал о нём. Но если быть честным то столбы я не помню чтоб стояли)))
user_5359 (2017-01-15 17:23:43+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
FraukeLeo (2021-05-02 12:45:46+00:00): Hallo tbuschi77! Danke fürs Einzeichnen, aber das sind wirklich keine highway=track, sondern nur schmale Fußpfade, also highway=path. Von tracktype=grade3 sehe ich da auch nichts. Ich habs geändert. Nicht dass noch eine radwandernde Familie mit Kinderanhänger versucht da lang zu fahren, das wäre nämlich keine gute Idee :)
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
literan (2017-01-10 23:03:10+00:00): здравствуйте! вы используете неверный тег для проездов под домами (арок). Надо tunnel=building_passage
sheldonelectric (2026-03-08 23:30:04+00:00): privet, what is the source for the russian names?
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2019-01-14 16:36:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
yaugenka (2017-01-10 00:03:35+00:00): Добрый день! Почему удалили точку урочища?
Alexey_ND (2017-01-10 06:42:00+00:00): Прежде всего не урочище а деревня. Я был там и видел лишь заборы, колючую проволоку, камеры и запрещающие знаки. Деревни нет больше.
yaugenka (2017-01-10 19:39:13+00:00): Потому и помечено было как урочище, а не деревня. Восстановите пожалуйста точку.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
chillly (2017-01-09 11:25:51+00:00): You have added what looks like advertising to a  road junction. OSM is not Google maps, we don't host adverts. If your business is nearby (it won't be in the middle of a junction) you can add it as, say, an office. 

If you just wanted to add an advert you need to go elsewhere.

I intend to remove this as it is clearly wrong, but if you want to add our business more appropriately I will help if you ask.
BCNorwich (2017-01-10 07:58:58+00:00): Hello, the tagging to this node can be removed as the information is mapped more fully at 173 Colney Hatch Lane to the north. This here is a duplication of part of the company information. 
ref :- http://www.ukbusinessforums.co.uk/reviews/rubbish-please-professional-rubbish-removal-in-london.324118/
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Hjart (2017-01-09 11:00:57+00:00): Vær opmærksom på at Bing er nogle år ældre end "Geodatastyrelsen"s fotos. Jeg har derfor måttet slette nogle ting du tilsyneladende har tegnet efter Bing for nogle dage siden.
Thue Janus Kristensen (2017-01-09 11:07:58+00:00): Det var jeg udemærket klar over. Bing er meget praktisk til at få en second opinion, fordi tingene ser anderledes ud om sommeren, men selvfølgelig har Geodatastyrelsen ret når de er uenige. Så det må være en svipser.
Thue Janus Kristensen (2017-01-09 11:08:22+00:00): Tak for rettelsen.
Hjart (2017-01-09 11:14:36+00:00): Det var bare nogle småting egentlig og bare lige for at høre at du har styr på tingene :-)
tbicr (2017-01-09 16:35:53+00:00): Вітаю, заўважыў Вашыя праўкі, яны падыходзяць пад паняцьце вандалізму, прапанаваў на форуме адкаціць усе Вашыя зьмены: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=625878#p625878
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
Fischkopp0815 (2017-01-09 13:12:38+00:00): Hallo Jan,

Ich habe mich mal am Symbol versucht
"yellow:white::T:yellow" stellt ein gelbes T auf weißem Hintergrund dar. Kommt das so hin?
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/help/rendering/osmc erklärt wie Sarah's Wanderkarte das interpretiert
smaprs (2017-01-10 02:27:21+00:00): Olá, bem-vindo. Apenas uma correção, já existe o local mapeado, não se deve duplicar informação.
miawgogo (2017-01-09 12:23:13+00:00): I think that we should keep it as construction until late evening of the the 16th as the council are going to quietly open it
miawgogo (2017-01-09 12:25:48+00:00): 15th not the 16th
DaveF (2017-01-09 17:30:32+00:00): Excellent. To check, did you mean to leave the roundabout North exit as construction & I presume both one ways of the Southern Link are operational?
Rick Wiles (2017-01-10 08:34:39+00:00): I know I had opened the north side of the roundabout, must have undone the change as I went back and forward a few times. There are a few lanes on the south side, I have only opened one as I am not sure which are which and know its not 100% correct.
user_5359 (2017-01-20 18:52:07+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2018-01-07 05:25:57+00:00): I have revert this changeset.
Supaplex (2017-01-09 10:19:30+00:00): 刪除無異義編號的鞋 店
PB5687 (2017-01-15 15:44:14+00:00): De Dodewaardsestraat is inderdaad al een lange tijd open, maar de zogenaamde 'weg onderlangs' nog niet. De werkzaamheden zijn begonnen, maar in de winter wordt er niet gewerkt. De verwachting is dat er pas in juni geasfalteerd kan worden. Zie bijv. http://www.projectradarwaalwaard.nl/BerichtenDocumenten/downloads_getfilem.aspx?id=625122
jaap de vries (2017-01-16 06:50:28+00:00): Aha, maar het ging over de toegangsweg van de dijk naar het nieuwe Beijer terrein. Die was al lang af en heb ik zelfs nog ingemeten met totalstation voor de bag.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-20 18:53:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:33:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:25:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:36:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:25:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:33:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
marczoutendijk (2017-01-09 15:14:12+00:00): Mooi gedaan die stuw, maar hij ligt feitelijk aan de andere zijde van de brug!
(Bovendien nu ook voor een deel onder de brug :) )
alphensebezorger (2017-01-09 17:15:07+00:00): Bovendien wordt waterway=weir volgens de wiki alleen op niet-gesloten wegen toegepast (waarbij de richting van de 'weg' afhangt van de hoge/lage kant). En building=yes riekt volgens mij naar taggen voor de renderer.
Kortom: haal de versie van 6 dagen geleden maar weer terug, en keer de richting van die 'weg' om.
Kogacarlo (2017-01-09 18:41:36+00:00): De stuw zit aan de bovenstroomse kant van de brug. Hier staat een mooie foto: http://nos.nl/artikel/2151912-morgen-weer-beperkte-scheepvaart-op-maas-waalkanaal.html
Kogacarlo (2017-01-09 18:51:51+00:00): Die building kun je zien als de fundering van beton. Bij de sluiswachterhuizen zijn ook maar steeds de funderingen weergegeven. De eigenlijke sluiswachterhuizen zijn veel groter, die steken uit aan alle kanten.
Kogacarlo (2017-01-09 18:55:55+00:00): Eigen foto Sambeek: http://i.imgur.com/IphD22W.jpg
Kogacarlo (2017-01-09 19:16:37+00:00): Vooruit ik heb de weir aangepast om een soort van edit-war te voorkomen. Twee andere sluizen zal ik ook nog doen.
marczoutendijk (2017-01-09 19:20:17+00:00): Ik was echt in de veronderstelling dat de stuw aan de andere zijde van de brug zat!
Wat betreft building heb ik er niet zoveel moeite mee. In Spanje bv. worden heel veel stuwdammen als building aangemerkt, hoewel ze dat in principe niet zijn.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:28:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-20 18:53:51+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-01-12 17:19:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:01:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Commodoortje (2017-01-14 18:44:38+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-15 19:59:35+00:00): Hi Whitii, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-15 19:59:30+00:00): Hi Whitii, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
mavl (2017-01-12 17:19:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Vincent E (2017-01-09 10:50:45+00:00): Sorry. Comment is wrong. This change should read "changed usuability setting to trekking bike ridable.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:05:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mueschel (2017-01-11 11:49:21+00:00): Hi,
looks like you wanted to tag some opening_hours (note the spelling!) here, but the tag looks strange:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365953558

Cheers, Jan
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2017-01-11 18:40:08+00:00): There was an access tag saying "only wednesdays" in Danish. I thought opening_hours would be more appropriate. I fixed the typo now.
mueschel (2017-01-11 18:45:05+00:00): Alright. The shortest opening_hours value I ever saw ;-)
mavl (2017-01-12 17:24:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Alexander-II (2017-01-09 16:08:20+00:00): Как интересно. Не подскажите, что там строят? Дом?
mavl (2017-01-12 17:02:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].