piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ralley (2019-04-26 05:04:18+00:00): Source was local knowledge (visited 26-Apr-2019)
ejont (2019-04-27 07:56:52+00:00): Hello Anandha Krishna!
Thank you for adding to the map.

Please have a look at the wiki-pages for highway=unclassified and highway=service. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice. Highway=service was correct here. That's why I've reverted this changeset.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-26 13:40:14+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-07-02 16:16:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71796814 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a licence-incompatible import in Italy following a request to the DWG.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2019-May/thread.html#66440 et al.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-26 13:40:08+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-26 13:40:01+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
noelbov (2019-04-26 17:12:54+00:00): Beste JochenRoosen
U hebt onlangs éénrichtingsverkeer in een deel van de Kneippstraat in Genk ingevoerd.
Mag ik gewoon uit interesse vragen welke bron u hiervoor hebt geraadpleegd en of die éénrichting gedurende de ganse dag geldt (of enkel tijdens de schooluren) en of dit eveneens zo is voor fietsers.
Dank U.
Noël
jochenroosen (2019-04-27 11:33:48+00:00): Dag Noël,
ik ben werkzaam voor het stadsbestuur Genk, dienst Mobiliteit. Vandaar dat ik weet van deze ingreep :)
Eenrichtingsverkeer geldt enkel voor auto's en is 24/7 van toepassing. De Wegcode laat niet toe om dit te beperken in tijd.
Jochen
noelbov (2019-04-27 13:52:13+00:00): Hallo, dank voor de feedback.
Ik heb bij de 3 segmenten van de Kneippstraat (vanaf de Reenstraat ) een tag bijgevoegd (oneway:bicycle=no)
Nu is de fietsroute tussen knooppunt 82 en 560 terug ononderbroken zoals je kan zien op: https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/nl/route/3641795
mvg.
Noël
fkMohr (2020-06-15 10:11:49+00:00): Woher stammt der Vorname Konrad?
Ich denke es war Karl.
Gruß Friedo
abakus_uploader (2019-04-26 22:30:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
luiswoo (2019-04-26 07:53:17+00:00): Так сложно посмотреть, как обозначаются служебные проезды https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=residential?uselang=ru
luiswoo (2019-04-26 07:55:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D1%8B#.D0.96.D0.B8.D0.BB.D1.8B.D0.B5_.D0.B7.D0.BE.D0.BD.D1.8B_.D0.B8_.D0.B4.D0.B2.D0.BE.D1.80.D0.BE.D0.B2.D1.8B.D0.B5_.D0.BF.D1.80.D0.BE.D0.B5.D0.B7.D0.B4.D1.8B
eggie (2019-04-26 07:38:52+00:00): Top!
Reza_koulivand (2019-05-15 05:00:51+00:00): سلام،مگر محدود یک روستا رو نباید تک منطقه مسکونی بزنیم؟؟

سلام، چرا شما منطقه روستایی را که در منطقه مسکونی ثبت شده است تغییر می دهید؟
moro76 (2019-04-29 00:15:28+00:00): Добрый день. В данном пакете правок вы совершили  ошибки: 1) присвоили тег addr:city	Благовещенск (при этом здания  находятся в Белогорске); 2) по Bing прорисовыли некоторые уже разрушенные здания. Пожалуйста перепроверьте и исправьте все свои правки, иначе я их удалю.
sebastic (2019-04-27 04:36:27+00:00): Don't create new (old-style) relations for the new wetland members, add the wetlands as inner members to the existing relation: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9512149
Harald Hartmann (2019-04-27 07:52:51+00:00): Also das Gebäude könnte man noch "rechtwinklig" machen - in iD die Linie markieren, Rechtsklick auf die markierte Linie und dann Rechtwinklig.

`ele` ist bei Gebäuden eher unüblich.

Wenn das Gebäude ausschließlich dem Geschäftszweck dient und keine Wohnung hat, dann könnte man sogar `building=commercial` oder `retail` (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dcommercial) taggen

Hier ist die Frage, ob das Gebäude selbst den Namen "Bötze-Eck" trägt, oder nur der Imbiss, dann würde man nämlich den Namen an den fastfood POI taggen, genauso auch die Öffnungszeiten (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours), was in dem Falle wohl "Mo-Fr 07:00-14:00" wäre, und wenn an Feiertagen geschlossen noch ein "; PH off" dahinter.

Der Hermes Paketshop würde man auch nicht als Name sondern als Eigenschaft/Attribut (operator, brand, etc.) taggen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=post%20office und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deutsche_Postdienstleister - und natürlich auch dort die Öffnungszeiten.

Hier bleibt es übrigens dir überlassen, ob du die Adresse, obwohl sie schon am Gebäude hängt, auch noch an den POIs taggst. Rein theoretisch kann man mit spatialen/geometrischen Abfragen das zuordnen, aber nachdem KISS Prinzip und für Anwender der Daten die keine entsprechende Kenntnisse haben, wäre es einfacher, auch wenn es sich dann um "Redundanzen" handelt.
GOwin (2019-05-05 03:01:46+00:00): Hi @Vir-gie! Thank you for OpenStreetMap contributions.

I noticed that the quality of the buildings you've been adding could be further improved, and as suggested in various OpenStreetMap [learning resources] (www.learnosm.org), you should "square" your buildings to improve their orthogonal features.

Here's a short video to help you with this: https://youtu.be/VPJz-AucqF4

If you're keen to know more about OpenStreetMap, the tagging convention page can come in handy: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions

There's also several channels you can check out, and reach out to fellow local mappers: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PH/channels

/GOwin
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-26 13:39:38+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-26 13:39:35+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-13 16:11:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136059221 where the changeset comment is: Reverting MAPS.ME garbage such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10893535607 .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7125
GOwin (2019-05-05 03:01:34+00:00): Hi @Vir-gie! Thank you for OpenStreetMap contributions.

I noticed that the quality of the buildings you've been adding could be further improved, and as suggested in various OpenStreetMap [learning resources] (www.learnosm.org), you should "square" your buildings to improve their orthogonal features.

Here's a short video to help you with this: https://youtu.be/VPJz-AucqF4

If you're keen to know more about OpenStreetMap, the tagging convention page can come in handy: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions

There's also several channels you can check out, and reach out to fellow local mappers: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PH/channels

/GOwin
Harald Hartmann (2019-04-27 07:41:00+00:00): Bzgl "Graben", wie du schon selbst geschrieben hast, hat dieser Weg eigentlich keinen offiziellen Namen sondern nur einen lokal gebräuchlichen, also anstatt `name` besser `loc_name` verwenden (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name)

Als Oberfläche hast du aktuell `gravel` gesetzt, was in iD als "Schotter" übersetzt ist. Leider ist auch hier die Übersetzung teils unglücklich, da wir hier im Sprachgebrauch Schotter eher anders verstehen. Angebracht wäre vermutlich eher `compacted` bzw. schaut es auf dem Luftbild eher nach `grass` aus (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface)

Und da ist da ja noch die Geschichte mit `footway` (Fussweg). Wenn dort keine blauen Lollies (mit Mutter und Kind drauf) stehen, dann ist es wohl eher ein `path` (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath)
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-26 13:39:27+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
juliustens (2019-05-19 23:06:32+00:00): Why did you delete the 'stop_position'?
Godik (2019-05-21 09:56:00+00:00): Ist das denn nötig, wenn schon "public_transport=station" und "railway=halt" gemappt ist?
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-26 13:39:11+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
rab (2020-06-29 12:19:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226754512/history
was there anything wrong with that bridge?
user_5359 (2019-07-24 18:56:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useless information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Jrachi (2019-05-14 11:27:54+00:00): I cambiamenti dei place su base di quali informazioni si basano?
Hai messo town a Balme perchè comune?
Dimacn (2019-04-26 13:43:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста не заполняйте тег name у жилых домов. Адресная информация хранится в соответствующих тегах. В name пишем только официальное название https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
PT-53 (2019-10-06 10:37:56+00:00): Hallo andyg,
ist die Sperrung der Kollbacher Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43964068/history
noch aktuell oder ist die Straße schon wieder frei gegeben?
Fragende Grüße
andyg (2019-10-07 16:14:53+00:00): Ich weiß es aktuell nicht, werde aber die Sperrung herausnehmen, sobald sie aufgehoben ist (komme 1x/Woche vorbei).
andyg (2019-10-07 16:17:59+00:00): Nachtrag: laut Gemeindeveröffentlichung bleibt die Sperrung bis Jahresende noch bestehen.
Quelle: https://www.vierkirchen.de/n/671/87/vollsperrung-der-kollbacher-strasse-in-rettenbach
PT-53 (2019-10-07 16:36:24+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-13 04:01:12+00:00): Way 640962007 name 😂
maraf24 (2019-04-28 22:20:44+00:00): Hej
Twoje edycje uszkadzają place. Znikają tagi highway=pedestrian i area=yes i zastępowane są błędnym area:highway=pedestrian.
kasmar00 (2019-04-28 11:23:47+00:00): Hej, usunąłeś nowe (otwarte w kwietniu 2019) przejście dla pieszych: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/682954895
TomaszWójcik (2019-04-28 11:36:20+00:00): Przepraszam, korzystałem z najnowszego dostępnego ortofoto (Geopoz 2018) i uznałem, że jeśli tam nie ma tego przejścia, to musi być jakiś błąd. W przypadkach dodawania do mapy nowo otwartych obiektów warto dodać tag "note=*" z krótką informacją kiedy dana rzecz pojawiła się w terenie, żeby uniknąć właśnie takich nieporozumień (i analogicznie w przypadku zamkniętych/ usuniętych obiektów)
PS. Nie odpisałeś mi na moją wiadomość na OSM ;)
maraf24 (2019-04-30 13:45:50+00:00): Warto mieć nawyk wciskania CTRL-H w JOSMie i sprawdzania, kiedy obiekt został dodany do OSM oraz zapoznania się z komentarzem do zestawu, który go dodał:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69090730
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-26 13:38:31+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
brabo (2021-09-20 14:39:13+00:00): it might take a fair time before these houses are actually finished. the original building company went bankrupt and the raw built of these houses contain several severe flaws that in the future must be fixed.
Supaplex (2019-08-09 15:33:25+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
BCNorwich (2019-04-26 10:47:21+00:00): Hi, it looks like your use of the level tag is somewhat astray. The level tag is used to show a particular level with regard to other levels, it is not a tag with which to define height or relevant height. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels

If this is a bungalow then the level tags would be building:levels=1,  roof:levels=1.  
Heights would be tagged separately, guidance for heights please see here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings

Regards Bernard
raito (2019-04-26 10:26:01+00:00): Hi, I would like to ask: What are your sources for these street names? Thanks.
Siobkhan (2019-05-20 05:46:55+00:00): Hi, hi, this is information from Google maps
Siobkhan (2019-05-20 06:00:40+00:00): sorry not Google, but satellite photo. I've already forgotten)))
SomeoneElse (2019-05-26 14:47:04+00:00): Er - you got the street names from a "satellite photo"?  That seems unlikely - something like Mapillary imagery or other suitably licensed imagery would work, but anything else (e.g. Google sources that aren't appropriately licensed) would not.
Can you please try and remember which source you used?  If you can't remember, we'll have to remove these names.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Siobkhan (2019-05-31 09:19:43+00:00): To be honest, I do not remember the source. That was a long time ago.
Do what you see fit. I don't care.
Sosha1996 (2019-05-02 18:55:52+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست ننویسید «ماکسیم». در کامنت چنجست باید توضیحاتی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2019-04-26 10:55:48+00:00): Top!
Alleen construction=yes nog even weghalen. 
Dit was je edit.. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69594619
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-26 11:17:24+00:00): Review.. Ziet er goed uit. 
Lastig stukje. Hier lopen ook fiets- en OV routes. Routeren zal het zeker wel. De routerelaties zijn nog intact. 
De BGT omtrekgericht is nog niet bijgewerkt. Tegen de tijd dat dat het geval is kun je nog een keer checken met editor JOSM. daar heb je de mogelijkheid die transparant op de achtergrond te zetten.
Overweeg over te stappen naar editor JOSM..

editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-26 11:18:48+00:00): De landuse=residential heb ik losgemaakt van gebouw en fietspad
Froony (2019-04-26 11:22:53+00:00): Bedankt voor de review en tips!
eggie (2019-04-26 11:03:59+00:00): Hier zie ik dat je een stukje weg hebt aangelegd, maar waar loopt dat heen?
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69594875
Gr eggie
Froony (2019-04-26 11:16:08+00:00): Ik heb geprobeerd de Valetonlaan aan te sluiten aan de Eykmanlaan. Daarvoor heb ik een nieuw segment gecreëerd, om ook de noordelijke rijbaan van de Eykmanlaan te verbinden. Ik begrijp dat dit niet goed is gegaan?
eggie (2019-04-26 11:30:08+00:00): Volgens mij is het nu goed. Ik analyseer met Achavi.. Dan zie je de rest van je andere edits niet.. alleen van de changeset. Alles zit aan elkaar vast.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-26 13:38:24+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
eggie (2019-04-26 11:02:35+00:00): Dit is wel een heel groot gebouw geworden
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69594935
Alle gebouwen zijn import vanuit het Kadaster. 
Mocht er een nieuw gebouw zijn gekomen dan kan dat beter worden geïmporteerd via het forum van OSM middels het draadje Verzoek Bagimport.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Verder heb je het gebouw vastgeplakt aan de landuse =residential.. Daarom is het gebied van je edits zo groot.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-04-26 11:06:51+00:00): Het nieuwe gebouw staat in de BAG  (kadaster)  Het kan dus zo met een verzoek geïmporteerd worden. Na import zou je de adresnodes kunnen herschikken.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=valetonlaan%206&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=&objectId=0344100000147533&geometry.x=137736.62299573&geometry.y=457648.56599851&zoomlevel=7
Gr Eggie
Froony (2019-04-26 11:13:51+00:00): Bedankt Eggie, dat wist ik niet. Het vastplakken aan de bebouwde kom is per abuis gegaan denk ik. Zou jij een verzoek kunnen doen op het forum? Moet ik nog e.e.a. ongedaan maken hier?
eggie (2019-04-26 11:27:37+00:00): Hoi.. een verzoek zal ik zo doen. De BAG importeur houdt rekening met de reeds aanwezige informatie.
Je hoeft niets te doen verder hier. 
De landuse ligt al los.
Froony (2019-04-26 11:34:49+00:00): Bedankt!
eggie (2019-04-26 11:36:03+00:00): Done..
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=746723#p746723
eggie (2019-04-26 21:01:11+00:00): Het is opnieuw geïmporteerd. Mochten er nog adressen ontbreken kun je dat doorgeven op het forum.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=746788#p746788

-----
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69615531
eggie (2019-04-26 10:58:47+00:00): Dag Froony.. De adresnode van de supermarkt ligt ergens buiten het gebouw. 
Wellicht per abuis verschoven.
Dit waren je edits.. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69594963
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-26 11:20:29+00:00): Ja.. nu duidelijk waarom die node nu daar ligt. :)
Froony (2019-04-26 11:21:08+00:00): Dat klopt, het winkelcentrum is verbouwd en uitgebreid. De AH ligt in dat nieuwe deel.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-26 11:06:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69595658 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-26 11:06:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69595658 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-26 11:06:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69595658 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
Navid Hosseinzadeh (2019-05-13 11:46:35+00:00): سلام. تغییراتی که روی مربندی های سیاسی اسلام شهر دارید انجام میدین باعث شده مرز و ریلیشن آن خراب بشه. هدفتون چیه ؟
ArminAzhideh (2019-05-14 06:58:17+00:00): سلام مشکل محدوده شهرک سعیدیه درشهرستان اسلامشهر بود که از روی نقشه اسلامشهر حذف شد ونقشه به حالت قبلی بازگشت
Navid Hosseinzadeh (2019-05-15 17:04:11+00:00): خب هنوزم مرز لول 8 اسلامشهر مشکل داره که توی لینک زیر میتونید ببنید. لطفا اگه با مرزبندی ها و ریلیشن ها آشنایی ندارید ابتدا مطالعه کنید. آموزش توی گروه و کانال تلگرامی ما هستش
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/J2D
مرسی
ArminAzhideh (2019-05-16 05:53:58+00:00): سلام ممنون از راهنمایی وعنایت شما لطفا در صورت آسیب رسیدن به نقشه شما زحمت بکشید درست کنید اشتباهات بنده رو بگذارید بر پایه بی تجربگی وتازه کار بودن بنده 
ممنون
Navid Hosseinzadeh (2019-05-17 02:50:26+00:00): اختیار دارید. ممنون که پاسخ دادین. با دوستان سعی می‌کنیم تو اولین فرصت مشکل مرز اسلام شهر رو درست کنید و اطلاعاتش رو بروز رسانی کنیم. فقط اگه منبع مناسبی از مرزبندی های اسلامشهر دارید به ما بدین.
راستی توی گروه تلگرام ما هستید؟
ArminAzhideh (2019-05-17 06:57:05+00:00): سلام ممنون از لطف شما و دوستانتون 
متاسفانه بنده منبع مناسبی جز گوگل مپ و ویز رو نمیشناسم
در کانال تلگرام اوپن استریت مپ ایران عضو هستم اما گروه خیر
با آرزوی توفیق و موفقیت همیشگی برای شما دوست عزیزم
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-26 13:38:19+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
alesarrett (2019-04-30 08:56:42+00:00): Please revert your edit: the amenity=school way you deleted didn't have the same attributes of the other, it was school Bernardi, while the other is Marconi. This school complex has to be revised and improved, but your edit is not correct.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-03-18 15:17:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148822076 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some anti-Mormon vandalism and other rubbish
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-26 11:06:52+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69595201, 69595204, 69595210, 69595212, 69595215, 69595224, 69595227, 69595242.
Serge Belychev (2019-04-26 11:15:16+00:00): изменение загиба трамвайных путей на перекрёстке пискунова и большой печёрской
viloan (2019-04-26 11:34:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Sosha1996 (2019-05-02 18:55:50+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست ننویسید «ماکسیم». در کامنت چنجست باید توضیحاتی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments