piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
flohoff (2015-08-10 14:35:14+00:00): Hi,
wenn du den POI schon bewegst dann kopier doch auch die Adressinformationen da drauf - Dann ist es vollständig (bis auf sowas wie öffnungszeiten)

Flo
PS: Und ein changeset kommentar wäre schön so das schnell zu sehen ist warum etwas geändert wurde oder was.
flohoff (2015-08-10 14:36:21+00:00): Hi,
hier hast du den Floristen angefasst. Die öffnugnszeiten sind so aber nicht maschinenlesbar. Das ist ja freitext.

Flo
4rch (2015-08-11 08:02:57+00:00): Hello johnparis, please do not edit administrative boundaries with iD editor. iD has no built in validator so you get no warnings when you damage multipolygons.

Yesterday you've damaged some administrative boundaries in Morocco (I've already repaired some of them): https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/280-countries-compare-2015-08-10

Today you've also damaged some administrative boundaries: https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/281-countries-compare-2015-08-11

Regards, 4rch
4rch (2015-08-11 08:19:17+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
4rch (2015-08-11 09:10:01+00:00): sorry, I've forgot to mention the JOSM editor which checks validity: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/
rickmastfan67 (2015-08-10 15:04:27+00:00): Just so you know, the 'access=yes' and 'motor_vehicle=yes' tags are both 'unnecessary' tags here.  All highways by default are 'access=yes' and 'motor_vehicle=yes' and don't need to have those tags.  So, in the future with iD, just completely ignore those options unless the highway really needs a 'access=private' or something similar.  Same goes with the 'motor_vehicle=*' tag.
eggie (2020-04-13 17:59:03+00:00): Buiten Nederland begonnen met mappen daarom nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
dj4n90 (2020-04-13 18:16:02+00:00): hihi, ja .. al 15 jaar kind aan huis daar .. miste in Komoot stukjes weg,
5m4u9 (2015-08-11 06:30:29+00:00): Gracias por corregir el nombre, pero añadir "Barrio" no es necesario porque está redundante.

No olvidar nunca que se añade datos al mapa para usar y no sólo para que se vea bien. :)
gorogoro (2015-08-11 12:29:59+00:00): La idea era compatibilizar con el de la zona Sud y a su vez que se note la diferencia. Pero tienes razón es redundante.
Sobre ese aspecto... Calle y Avenida también resulta redundante me parece... y ponerlo en cada Calle y Avenida, creo, sobrecarga la base de datos, hay algo que se puede hacer?
5m4u9 (2015-08-11 13:23:53+00:00): Calle y Avenida no es redundante porque highway= no representa a una calle, avenida, pasaje. Todavía no se ha llegado a un acuerdo como clasificar esto y si es necesario clasificar bajo este tipo.

De todas formas si llegaremos a acordar cómo diferenciar será un toque cambiar esto. ¿alguna sugerencia para esto?
ljc_jlyb (2023-01-14 13:48:49+00:00): Is this even real?
andrzej_aa (2015-08-11 06:45:23+00:00): Za dużo. Zalew do naprawy: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4487214
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-08-10 14:09:52+00:00): Proszę nie przyklejać obszarów do dróg.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-22 22:47:30+00:00): Hi,
This is quite a large changeset.  It would be really helpful to other mappers if you could localise changes a bit more - that way changes like this won't appear in everyone's "history" list, but only in those mappers local to a change.
muralito (2015-08-11 03:11:54+00:00): Hola.
¿Porque borraste este tramo de camino?
¿No se puede caminar de Ferreira Aldunate a Garibaldi?
walfredo (2015-08-11 16:31:26+00:00): Gracias por tu interes .... es cierto caminar se puede pero no se puedecircular en vehiculos.
no corresponde a este foro pero en mi opinión si este tramo estuviera abierto al transito vehicular facilitaria mucho la circulación en la zona y el acceso a este barrio.
saludos.
muralito (2015-08-11 19:18:11+00:00): Bien. Cuando dibujes no pienses solo en autos. El mapa también se puede usar para caminar, bicicletear, etc.
walfredo (2015-08-12 17:00:22+00:00): gracias por la sugerencia, la tendré en cuenta.
muralito (2015-08-11 03:13:28+00:00): Esta calle de servicio que borraste , ¿no existe mas?
¿Que te motivo a borrarla?
Harald Hartmann (2015-08-12 05:56:21+00:00): Hallo gustav1. Hast du von diesem Rastplatz ein Foto gemacht und könntest mir evtl. sagen, ob dort eine SG-Nummer angebracht war?
Laut meiner Karte (http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/ubersicht-schleusegrund_13863#14/50.5741/10.8732) müsste das so sein und dort auch noch bestimmt ein paar Wegweiser rumstehen.
Wenn nicht muss ich selbst mal demnächst vom Dreiherrenstein runterfahren.
gecho111 (2015-08-18 16:18:57+00:00): Is "Canadian Pacific Regina Terminal" the best description for this feature?  The CP rail yard has been moved to the GTH west of the city.  This triangular section is specifically for interline transfers between CN & CP.

For such a minor feature it gets rather large representation at many zoom levels.
Tom Hogan (2015-08-22 19:00:32+00:00): I moved it closer to the former site of the Regina passenger depot and renamed it.  Thanks for the input
muralito (2015-08-11 03:28:34+00:00): Hola. Si flechas este tramo de Rivadavia ¿Por donde entran los autos?
hispeed33 (2015-08-12 14:24:31+00:00): La calle Rivadavia entre Cufre y Paullier el el felchado es así. En el cambio fleché el tramo del otro lado de Garibaldi sin querer que es doble mano. Ya lo corrijo.
Saludos
muralito (2015-08-12 18:03:12+00:00): Si, me referia justamente ese tramo que ya corregiste. Gracias.
hlam-2008 (2015-08-10 17:58:33+00:00): прошу, в следующий раз снесенные здания (которые видно на бинге) не удалять,  а переделать в линию и повесить заметку "снесено", дабы не рисовать их повторно
vint (2015-08-11 10:22:21+00:00): ok, буду знать
cquest (2015-08-16 18:50:39+00:00): Attention, de nombreux objets déplacés par erreur aux abords de la Gare d'Austerlitz... J'ai remis de l'ordre sur ce que j'ai vu d'incohérent.
Géovélo (2015-08-21 11:23:38+00:00): Bonjour Cquest. Sur la Gare d'Austerlitz vous avez en effet retiré certains tronçons qui permettaient de rejoindre le RER avec son vélo à la main...Il faudrait que l'on puisse se coordonner car j'ai ptet fait des erreurs...mais le fond était plutôt bon...

Ben de Géovélo
cquest (2015-08-21 12:35:27+00:00): Sauf erreur de ma part, mes corrections n'ont fait que remettre à leur place des noeuds visiblement déplacés par erreur et qui provoquaient un gros bazar au abords nord-est de la gare.
Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33375436
MKnight (2017-03-18 19:16:12+00:00): Finde die Löschung wenig optimal.
MKnight (2017-04-19 12:54:29+00:00): revertiert in #47938116
neuhausr (2016-04-04 21:49:59+00:00): why is the same poi entered multiple times? see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
trigpoint (2015-08-16 11:59:44+00:00): Hi
Something appears to have gone wrong with this series of changes.
The national park relation is broken and some of the B3188 (North of Monksliver) is now missing.
What were you trying to achieve? Maybe we can help you.

Cheers
Phil
roburite (2015-08-17 21:05:08+00:00): Well I was just trying to create the full, continuous, boundary of the NP from west to east. The stuff I can see on this page doesn't mean anything to me. Why are some entries crossed out? for instance!
trigpoint (2015-08-17 22:46:50+00:00): It is not usual to create a single way for a large boundary such as Exmoor National Park, but rather to create a relation that combines ways that form the boundary such as roads, streams and the coast.
The crossed out items are things that were deleted by the changeset.
A section of the B3188 is missing where it formed part of the boundary.
I think it would be best if these changes are reverted as they are otherwise difficult to fix.
Is there any particular reason you needed a single boundary, that the relation did not do?
Phil
roburite (2015-08-17 23:18:23+00:00): Well I couldn't find a way of showing the extent of the NP so I thought it needed a single boundary. I hadn't got round to doing the coast. If woodland (for example) can be shown as a block why not a national Park?
SomeoneElse (2015-08-18 02:10:56+00:00): It should "show as a block" on OpenStreetMap-carto at some zoom levels (see the parks at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=7/53.998/-2.098 for example), and at higher zoom levels to z9 there's a green background tinge.  After that you get a name on the border, like http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/54.2322/-1.2253 .  That's not working now because the relation is not complete: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/86909#map=10/51.1574/-3.6076
trigpoint (2015-08-18 07:53:04+00:00): National Parks are larger than woods, they share boundaries with other objects. 
Boundaries are mapped relations as this makes them easier to handle, can you imagine the problem if England was mapped as a.single.way?
roburite (2015-08-18 08:02:13+00:00): SomeoneElse said that NP should display at some zoom levels but it wasn't doing that. I thought I was doing the right thing to make it show up in that way.
So is it possible to turn this back ? My understanding now is that I would identify existing ways and add NP data/feature to them.
trigpoint (2015-08-18 08:07:41+00:00): It is possible , I will put it back at lunchtime and then we can see what the original problem was.

Phil
SomeoneElse (2015-08-18 08:28:49+00:00): @trigpoint thanks.  

@roburite One of the reasons why a "single way" isn't often used for large features such as a national park boundary is that OSM ways are limited to 2000 nodes, and it's easy to exceed that with even a small level of detail.  There are "relationship checker" tools that can identify small gaps that might not be immediately humanly visible - we can use one of those to see what the problem is, and alternative renderings that can show if it's just a problem with one map style.  If "something has gone a bit wrong" it's often easiest to undo the changes as a whole and then try and work forward from there rather than trying to fix things piecemeal - it's simply a quicker way to get to the destination.
trigpoint (2015-08-18 16:47:24+00:00): I have reverted the series of changes and the National Park boundary relation appears to be complete.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/86909

The changes were made in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33419712
SomeoneElse (2015-08-18 17:08:12+00:00): Thanks.  It's rendering (as a green line) at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/51.1181/-3.8639 .  Does it need an area=yes as well or any other tags?  Compare http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/86909#map=16/51.1104/-3.8569 with http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2176657#map=15/53.0966/-1.9545 (the Peak District, which displays at all zooms as expected).
SomeoneElse (2015-08-18 17:11:25+00:00): For info the name shows up at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/51.1585/-3.8956 .  It's the green fill at z9 I'm wondering about.  Need to wait for http://b.tile.openstreetmap.org/9/250/171.png/status to render before experimenting, though.
trigpoint (2015-08-18 17:17:36+00:00): Area=yes added in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33420684
roburite (2015-08-18 19:51:59+00:00): Ok. I think I'll just leave it alone now.
kayle (2015-08-14 06:57:37+00:00): Ahoj, pozerám ze sa ti tu podarilo spraviť cestu už cez existujúcu cestu. Pridal (upravil) si teriary_link od "Malý mačací zámok" do Majcichova, kde už existovala cesta. Ak už cesta existuje, nekresli ďalšiu, ale uprav existujúcu (okrem toho sa mi moc nezdá tag tertiary_link na tej ceste. residential a unclassified sa mi tam viac hodí)

Prosím tiež dávaj pozor čo s čím spájaš. Podarilo sa ti cestu spojiť z domov a tento spoločný bod si potiahol preč. 

A na záver tiež pozor na to, aby veci čo majú byť spojené aj boli spojené. (bod cesty v obci Majcichov si síce dotiahol do blízkosti inej cesty ale neboli spojene. Aj keď to na webe vyzerá OK, routovanie nebude na takýchto cestách funkčné.) 

Pozri sa, prosím, na tieto tvoje upravy a oprav ich. Ak by si s tím mal nejaký problém, kľudne sa pýtaj.
AndHav (2015-12-04 11:50:54+00:00): Ahoj, potrebovala by som pomoct s trasou na tomto linku https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=26038214#map=15/48.2683/17.7130

Cesta 62 je v jednom usekuoznacena ako jednosmerna, je to miesto, kde sa prekryva zjazd z dialnice s cestou 62. Pri vytvorani trasy pre vozidlo potom nie jemozne vozidlo navigovat priamo do serede cez kruhovy objazd,ale len cez Hornu Stredu
Vopred vdaka
a,
kayle (2015-12-04 12:20:36+00:00): Som mierne zmateny kde presne to je. V odkaze sa spomina bod http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26038214 co je place=village (Velka Maca) 
A na ceste 62 v okoli Serede pri vyjazde 14 z R1 nevidim ziadnu jednosmerku.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=48.2784%2C17.7125%3B48.2864%2C17.7375#map=14/48.2736/17.7251
Najlepsie by bolo hodit na mapu poznamku na to miesto kde je problem. (v pravo v ponuke kliknut na "bublinku" umiestnit znaku namiesto a napisat popis chyby)
Palolo (2022-06-07 16:21:21+00:00): Thank you for your contributions.
datendelphin (2015-08-15 06:32:59+00:00): vehicle=no includes bicycles=no, you didn't need to add this tag
zarl (2016-05-12 10:30:01+00:00): Hi Anoniman,

hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/503560 wird gefragt, was es mit dem Namen "Heckenstaller-Trog" auf sich hat, eine nicht ganz unberechtigte Frage. Ist das ein offizieller Name, steht der irgendwo auf einem Strassenschild? Oder ist das "Kunst" (und kann weg)?
*Martin* (2015-08-11 08:35:28+00:00): super!
naoliv (2015-08-28 19:54:47+00:00): Antonio, qual o nome da linha que você adicionou?
Possui vários nomes nos mesmos trechos, o que não está certo.
É algo proposto/planejado ainda? Já existe construção?
naoliv (2015-08-28 19:56:46+00:00): As plataformas de VLT que você mapeou já existem?
pitscheplatsch (2015-08-10 19:10:25+00:00): Namensänderung wegen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/411185
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-21 16:42:25+00:00): Test Test
Nakaner (2016-10-17 21:48:13+00:00): Hi LogicalViolinist,

could you please point me to the posting on Imports and Talk-ca mailing list according to the Import Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Import/Guidelines&oldid=1186549 – that's the guideline in the version valid at that time)?

Where is this import documented?

CC-BY 4.0 is not compatible to our licensing scheme by default. Gatineau.ca/donneesouvertes Could you please point me to the written agreement of city of Gatineau that the naming them as a source at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/Contributors is sufficient?

Best regards

Michael
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-17 21:58:03+00:00): Hello Michael, you can find this information by yourself I have officially quit contributing to OSM this agreement dates back to 2013. Have a nice day.
Nakaner (2016-10-17 22:02:42+00:00): Thany you for your quick response. It will be the reasone for me to revert this changesets in the following days. The revert will either be announced on Talk-ca list beforehand or performed by DWG themselves.
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-17 22:05:53+00:00): Oh it is a legal addition of data, i'm just not going to put forward the effort to dig up documentation for you
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-17 22:25:19+00:00): F.y.i: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gatineau/Import
Nakaner (2016-10-18 09:27:44+00:00): Thank you for the link to the wiki page. But where is

1. the entry in the Imports Catalogue (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Import/Catalogue&oldid=1359164),

2. the discussion on Talk-ca mailing list (I have searched the archive from January to August 2015 and not found any discussion) and

3. the discussion on the international Imports mailing list?

In addition, the email by city of Gatineau does not say that listing them on the Contributors page meets the attribution requirement of CC-BY 4.0 license. (I used Google Translator because I do not understand French.) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-18 09:51:34+00:00): Are you daft? I just told you this dates back from 2013. Also using google translate for a legal acceptance, should not be a practice to maintain
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-18 09:55:13+00:00): Also I was not aware of the import catalog at the time. I will add it later today.
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-18 10:41:34+00:00): I cannot post the request sent to them as it was through a contact form and is in french, which you wouldnt understand anyways. I had asked them if adding them to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/Contributors
Was sufficient. I also added them to the source because it's the right thing to do.
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-18 11:46:38+00:00): I also ran the text in google translate and it gives nothing remotely intelligible:

We attribute to use and import our addresses in the OpenStreetMap project only if you give us the award as a data source.

Regards,

Gatineau's Communications Department

-------------
Really? "give us the award as a data source." and you are going to use that as a basis for legal obligations?
Nakaner (2016-10-18 12:23:27+00:00): Hi LogicalViolinist,

why should the data be distributed under a license which only requires an attribution of OSM, not of the City of Gatineau if nobody can tell us if the city is ok with the lacking attribution at every usage of their data (because our data users only attribute OSM, not the city additionally)?

I had a look on the subjects of the archives of Talk-ca and Imports mailing list of whole 2013 and did not find a posting about an import in Gatineau. Did I oversee it?

I will ask for comments about all these issues on Imports or Legal-Talk mailing list in the next days.

Best regards

Michael
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-18 12:26:09+00:00): As I've said: I had asked them if adding them to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/Contributors
Was sufficient. I also added them to the source because it's the right thing to do.

Their response was that it was sufficient attribution. End of story
Nakaner (2016-10-18 12:35:01+00:00): "give us the award as a data source." is not clear enough from my point of view and therefore I will ask other people how to handle this import.
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-18 12:36:54+00:00): This is why I told you not to use google translate. The permission is given if we give them attribution on the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/Contributors page
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-18 13:06:29+00:00): Micheal please see Données ouvertes de la Ville de Montréal which has the same license as Gatineau and is approved with the same exception(give explicit permission). 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Import/Catalogue&oldid=1359164
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-18 17:27:20+00:00): Michael please see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gatineau/Import#Follow_up_permission
Which clears up any doubt you had.
This puts us on par with Montreal's open data catalog where they needed permission due to CC-BY-4.0
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-18 17:28:52+00:00): I have also added Gatineau to the import catalog here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue

Thank you for your understanding. Good day.
utack (2016-04-07 13:29:34+00:00): Da hast du aber Spaß gehabt mit den ganzen Piers. Wie lange hat das gedauert?
jacobbraeutigam (2016-04-07 18:37:43+00:00): Ne ganze Weile. Und da geht ja noch was... :-)
RicoElectrico (2015-08-14 00:06:13+00:00): Ważna rzecz. Nie dodajemy tagu building na węzłach! Sam adres i tyle. Albo budynek z tagami adresu.
eBin (2016-01-19 09:15:04+00:00): Jakie było źródło zmiany adresu tych budynków?
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=237724309
http://ebin.josm.pl/uploads/Zrzut%20ekranu%20z%202016-01-19%2010-14-18.png
GerdP (2015-10-19 08:11:19+00:00): please review:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339268729
The tag highway=collasped
is obviously a typo, but even
highway=collapsed is rarely used.
Consider highway=construction or 
highway=dismantled or highway=abandoned
DUGA (2021-10-28 02:16:02+00:00): The stop sign should be set at the stop line.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3690360803#map=19/38.99642/-76.89996
GerdP (2015-10-16 09:00:31+00:00): please review :
way 365002632
has invalid tags:
highway=residential;unclassified
tiger:county=Utah, UT;Wasatch, UT
rkcpi (2018-02-22 08:18:30+00:00): Woher stammt denn die Info, dass im Grötzinger Tunnel selbst keine Mautpflicht besteht?
Nakaner (2018-02-22 09:00:57+00:00): Hallo rkcpi,

weil von Westen kommend vor dem Portal das Verkehrszeichen 390.2 (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_390.2_-_Ende_der_Mautpflicht_nach_dem_Bundesfernstra%C3%9Fenmautgesetz,_StVO_2015.svg) hängt. Ich weiß nicht, ob das auf Mapillary schon sichtbar ist, aber ich fahre die Strecke regelmäßig. Auswendig weiß ich nicht, ob es schon am Knoten B 10/B 3 hängt oder näher am Portal.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner (2018-02-22 09:04:14+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?mapStyle=mapbox_streets&pKey=NnX7I0NOH3tgNxysYTg4gw&lat=49.00519405473369&lng=8.49480854714011&z=17&focus=photo

In der Gegenrichtung hängt es exakt gegenüber.
martiensch (2016-01-11 18:28:56+00:00): Hoi Sven,

Ik wou even informeren dat de gebouwen die jij op Rottumeroog ingetekend had niet meer bestonden, dus heb ik ze verwijderd.

Groeten,

Martien
Kakaner (2015-08-10 23:03:25+00:00): Doch, IC hält auch in Bad Hersfeld, z.B. IC 2256
Kakaner (2015-08-10 23:00:05+00:00): Ui, da nennt einer eine von mir angelegte Relation "Schrott".

Nakaner, wie wäre es bei einem kleinen Aufenthalt in einer geschlossenen Psychiatrie? Nicht, dass du dir noch etwas antust?
Kakaner (2015-08-10 22:50:28+00:00): Oh, mit reverter_plugin, wie komfortabel. :)

Wie wäre es damit, alle anderen Nettos in Dresden einheitlich umzubenennen?
Kakaner (2015-08-10 22:51:01+00:00): Ach ne, das wäre ja Arbeit, das kann man ja gar nicht mit dem reverter_plugin machen. Da müsste man ja selbst sein Hirn einschalten und nicht einfach die Arbeit anderer rückgängig machen.
Alecs01 (2015-08-16 12:47:45+00:00): Por favor no creen falsas "pistas" inexistentes en el mapa, para trazar rutas hay que utilizar relaciones: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route
andrzej_aa (2015-08-11 06:07:42+00:00): Ta relacja jest do wywalenia: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4797146
andrzej_aa (2015-08-11 06:51:52+00:00): Jakbyś mógł też pociąć tę relację: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3505351 Tory i drogi w naturalny sposób wskazują, gdzie można to zrobić. Chyba że to jakaś puszcza, wtedy dodaj nazwę ;)
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-08 10:13:43+00:00): Can you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1261592 ?
edvac (2015-08-11 00:26:20+00:00): And Zari ward also corrected (I forgot)
naoliv (2015-09-05 04:02:07+00:00): Adilson, de novo você alterou a classificação da cidade.
Por favor, não faça isso. A classificação é dada pela população do local.
"village" não significa que o local é uma vila, mas que possui uma população menor de 10 mil habitantes.
Use essa tabela para evitar erros futuros: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Key:place#Valores
SomeoneElse (2015-08-11 19:15:23+00:00): Hello, as I mentioned on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33199691 , neither of these sources are likely to be licence-compatible (unless you've obtained explicit permission).  If you haven't, and both sources are licence-incompatible, then these changes will have to be undone.  Can you please confirm what steps you've taken to ensure that the licence of the data that you are continuing to add is suitable for adding to OpenStreetMap?
CYM1988 (2015-08-11 21:11:05+00:00): Hi, I have looked more into the licence issues on the source, Haroldstreet takes its data from the Database of British and Irish Hills and and credit for that data would be to them. As for the DoBIH, the downloads section of the website by the licence information states that the preffered attribution for use of their data is a mention that it is them the data orginated and a link to the website of which I am adding to the changeset comments. I have just this afternoon emailed them also for further clarification and will contact the wider OSM community for advice on future edits from outside sources