piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joost schouppe (2021-06-01 14:07:50+00:00): Jamaar Jakka, je hebt hier een fietspad toegoevgd en op het zuidelijkste stukje Spoorwegstraat en op Nederhem de reeds-op-de-weg gemapte fietspaden niet gewist. Ondertussen staat er een relatie op, dus laten we ze maar houden. Maar ik weet nu niet goed hoe de aansluitingen aan de zuidkant te doen zonder ALLE fietspaden vrijliggend te gaan tekenen...
BCNorwich (2021-01-12 10:41:57+00:00): Hi, You have a duplicated section of path here and three places where the path crosses water with no bridge, one of which your path joins onto the water.
Need help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-01-14 12:56:52+00:00): No response so I've remove the duplicated section of way, added hedges and bridges.
Patchanka (2021-01-14 12:10:12+00:00): Bonjour
merci pour vos ajouts.
Concernant les "noms de points", vous avez ajouté juste un nom mais il faudrait indiquer de quoi il s'agit. Le nom d'un lieu dit, d'un quartier, d'un magasin, etc... 
Renseigner le nom ne suffit pas, il faut qu'est-ce-qui porte ce nom.
Calihourcq, Lacrouzade, Les Neuf Chemins, ce sont des lieux-dits ?
lazone (2021-01-17 18:48:58+00:00): Bonjour, ce sont les noms des intersections, on doit pouvoir les assimiler a des lieux-dits, je vais modifier cela.
Je me permets de vous poser une question, ais je le droit de mettre les numéros des maisons de mon quartier? Merci
Patchanka (2021-01-18 11:36:10+00:00): bonjour
concernant ces noms de carrefour, y-a-t'il par exemple un panneau sur place ?
J'ai vu que vous avez ajouté une description "Lieu-dit". C'est une bonne chose mais malheureusement ce n'est pas la bonne manière de faire. (ce n'est pas grave de se tromper !)
D'une manière générale, dans l'éditeur ID que vous utilisez, il faut choisir dans le panneau de gauche ce qu'on souhaite ajouter, on peut utiliser le champ de recherche (tapez par exemple "lieu" et vous verrez qu'il vous propose plusieurs types de lieux-dits, cliquez alors sur celui qui correspond le mieux)
Voici un lien vers le wiki qui vous donnera quelques bases utiles : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
D'une manière générale, tout le monde a le droit de rajouter des choses sur la carte !
Faites-vous la main en faisant de petites modifs et en cochant éventuellement la case "Je souhaite que quelqu'un vérifie mes modifications".
Et n'hésitez pas à poser des questions comme vous le faites déjà !
Bonne carto
Hedaja (2022-01-03 11:39:21+00:00): Hi
I saw that in this changeset you probably accidentally created a toilet in the middle of nowhere: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8313015082/history

Is that correct and we can delete that node? The parking area nearby already has it's toilet mapped as well.

Best regards
-Christian
Mxdanger (2022-01-03 17:51:10+00:00): Must have accidentally copied it over there or something I have no idea. Yeah it should be safe to remove.
Hedaja (2022-01-03 17:54:35+00:00): Done... Happy Mapping
sovereign_ch (2021-01-11 21:24:47+00:00): Das spielt keine Rolle und ist genau die Aussage von 'tracktype=grade1'. Ganz sicher ist dies aber keine urbane Grundstückszufahrt. Zurückgesetzt.
datendelphin (2021-01-16 10:29:09+00:00): Wieso ist urban relevant?
sovereign_ch (2021-01-19 01:24:31+00:00): 'Urban' ist nicht als Schlüsselwort gedacht, sondern soll bei der Einordnung helfen. 'driveway' wird man in unseren Breitengraden – alleine schon aus Kostengründen – meist als kurzen Schnipsel von einer Erschliessungsstrasse (egal ob öffentlich oder privat) finden. Sehr passend ist die Definition 'Ein- oder Auffahrt' (zum Grundstück) im dt. wiki, die ist IMO präziser als "Zufahrt".

Vom Abstrakten zum Konkreten: die Erschliessung der (Bauern-)Höfe, Maiensässe, Weiler, et al (wie hier) erfolgt über Wirtschaftsstrassen, die tendenziell auch (vor allem?) landwirtschaftlichem Verkehr dienen bzw. für diesen erstellt wurden. Ob jetzt "dort" ein Bauer mit 4x4-Geländefahrzeug oder ein Manager mit Elektroauto wohnt, oder ob das umliegende Land aktiv bewirtschaftet wird, spielt nicht wirklich eine Rolle, da wir keine sozialökonomischen Faktoren mappen. Würde "dort" eine neue Siedlung gebaut und die Strasse eine grundsätzlich neue Funktion erhalten, könnte man dies durchaus anpassen.

Zwischen unzähligen Feldern (und Grundstücken) ist dies aber kein 'driveway' und die Begründung "asphaltiert" ein Fehlschluss im Bezug auf die Strassenkategorie.
datendelphin (2021-01-19 07:12:58+00:00): Das hab ich mir gedacht, dass 'Urban' bei der Einordnung helfen soll. Meine Frage war, wie du darauf kommst. service hat keine Einschränkung auf Urban, ländliche Gegenden dürfen diese Klasse auch nutzen.

driveway ist ja nur eines von mehreren Zusatztags, das muss nicht verwendet werden. Unklar, wieso du da so viel mit driveway argumentierst. Ich würde den service=driveway hier ja auch weg lassen. Mir gehts um den highway tag.

Mir ist immer noch unklar, wieso dies komplett zurückgesetzt werden musste.

Nun nochmals zum ursprünglichen Kommentar, etwas mehr Erklärung für Swisstom welcher vermutlich noch ein relativ neuer mapper ist: Die Oberfläche einer Strasse sollte tatsächlich wenig Einfluss haben darauf, welchen Strassentyp wir mappen. Aber die Oberfläche ist natürlich ein wichtiges Merkmal, und wird mit dem surface= tag erfasst. Also in diesem Fall surface=asphalt
sovereign_ch (2021-01-11 21:26:04+00:00): Keine urbane Grundstückszufahrt. Zurückgesetzt.
gileri (2021-01-12 00:01:52+00:00): Merci pour cet ajout, vivement qu'il fasse meilleur pour qu'on puisse bien profiter de cet itinéraire !
Cristoffs (2021-01-11 21:16:55+00:00): Wycofany.
dgitto (2021-01-12 02:40:26+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 17:38:29+00:00): è un pasticcio: non hai inserito l'intersezione tra i due sentieri sopra Colle Cialdea nè diviso le highway per costruire la route, hai cancellato dalla relazione "513" un tratto del percorso, duplicato il percorso "Tratto di raccordo per Via delle Creste sentiero CAI LH2", creato quindi la route "Tratto di raccordo per Via delle Creste sentiero CAI LH2". Sarebbe da mettere a posto. Grazie
JeSe-MX (2022-08-14 14:06:42+00:00): ¿Por qué se eliminaron los carriles de la vía 35339150?
birdymaps (2022-08-15 17:35:02+00:00): Hello and thank you for reaching out. I am a little confused about your question because I added a lane tag to this way and it is still there. Do you perhaps mean a different way? Thank you again!
!bm (2021-01-12 00:58:47+00:00): Hier wurde ein addr:*-Knoten gekapert – bei näherer Betrachtung scheint es jedoch wieder ein nicht-existierendes, fiktionales Element zu sein, wie schon in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97324764 – s. Anm. dazu dort, gilt ebenso hier. Aus genannten Gründen revertiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97334936
eggie (2021-01-11 22:03:22+00:00): Dag Karel.. 
Je vraagt om feedback.. Lijkt me prima als dat bos zo aansluit.
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2021-01-18 15:12:45+00:00): Hello Sushii. Thanks for mapping here 
Please be more accurate when you map and square the rectangular buildings
Please read this document how to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Please  solve also the issues which are showed by the issue triangle .
Best regards
user_5359 (2021-01-12 05:45:05+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.osm.org/way/636624872: What is the meaning of roof:shape=4?
nickjohnston (2021-01-12 08:55:42+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out. I added it by mistake. I've fixed it now.
Dino Michelini (2021-01-14 13:03:44+00:00): foot=yes non serve in quanto è sottointeso,
ElliottPlack (2021-05-29 06:13:14+00:00): Here we go again with the massive cleanup! Why did you remove buildings that were recently constructed?
Jose Luis Infante (2021-01-12 17:23:32+00:00): Hola,
moltes gràcies per la teva edició. He modificat les dues restriccions per només una (obligat girar a la dreta).
Salutacions!
marineritu (2021-01-12 20:28:41+00:00): Doncs se m'ha oblidat modificar a la mateixa cruïlla que, baixant general Manso es pot girar a l'esquerra cap a Sant Jaume també. Es pot veure a google earth.
Jose Luis Infante (2021-01-14 14:28:22+00:00): No cal que ho facis, ja que si ho hi ha restricció que afecti a aquest gir, es suposa que es pot girar, ja que el sentit del carrer (oneway) ho permet.
Tampoc facis servir fonts com Google Earth, ja que les seves dades són privades. Amb PNOA es pot veure el gir.

Salutacions!
!bm (2021-01-12 00:39:34+00:00): Hallo WhiskyMacK,

du hast hier den node des Luftbrückendenkmal gelöscht und damit dessen Chronik verworfen. Bitte mal mit OSM-Grundlagen befassen und beachten:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Die angegebene Quelle halte ich für nicht ausreichend, um hier ein Mapping als way zu rechtfertigen – was meines Erachtens auch nicht nötig bzw sinnvoll ist, da heritage=* und artwork=* unterschiedliche, räumliche Ausdehnungen zu haben scheinen, wenn man sich Kartendaten des Landesdenkmalamts ansieht – hier dürfte weniger tatsächlich mehr (bzw in der Unbestimmtheit korrekter) sein.

Ich habe daher den node wiederhergestellt und die way verworfen. Die von dir neu hinzugefügten Tags, soweit sinnvoll/belegbar, habe ich übernommen – zumindest für diese Verbesserung vielen Dank!

--besteGrüße!bm
chnuessli (2021-01-12 12:49:43+00:00): :))
GinaroZ (2021-01-11 22:20:05+00:00): What exactly have you fixed here?
woodpeck_repair (2021-03-31 06:45:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 102020319, 102013660, 102017051, 102013098, 102011378, 102025540, 102016336, 102012763, 102015297, 102022908, 102027001, 102011893, 102014416, 102018345, 102009137, 102015795, 102012305, 102030139, 102028531, 102024191, 102013937, 102019227, 102017661, 102014727, 102021580, 102013409, 102014180 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed Kosu77 imports
ivanbranco (2021-01-12 14:27:45+00:00): Hi ArtieArtArt,

you used address:housenumber=*, the correct tag is addr:housenumber=*
bxl-forever (2021-05-13 16:02:38+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for this but it broke 6 route relations… because the you left the railway switch—formerly a stop position node—into them.  Don’t worry, it’s fixed now. ;-)
Pierre Beyssac (2021-05-13 17:00:12+00:00): Hello,
Oops, thanks, really sorry for my mistake. To make sure I understand so it doesn't happen again: I should have checked the node's relation, removed it from its relations, and added the new station node in replacement?
bxl-forever (2021-05-13 18:09:55+00:00): Yes, precisely.
Have a nice day.
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-12 07:38:55+00:00): Hi CRossF, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting driveways which are visible in the utilized satellite imagery? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=97332250#12/30.5089/-92.2077

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
hvalentim (2021-01-12 10:27:26+00:00): A alteração é polémica. O consenso é de que não se alteram os limites administrativos, oficialmente definidos através da CAOP. Para evitar o seu desvirtuamento é igualmente inconveniente conflá-los/uni-los com outros objectos não administrativos. Por outro lado, recordo que para trabalhar a linha de costa existem fontes de melhor qualidade do que as que está a usar, nomeadamente  as “Ortofotos 10 cm - Zonas Costeiras de Portugal Continental - 2014-2015 (DGT)” e o “Modelo Digital do Terreno (Resolução 2 m) - Zonas Costeiras de Portugal Continental - 2014-2015 (DGT)”  (que encontra por definição disponíveis no JOSM e também pode adicionar manualmente ao iD). Pondere reverter a sua edição.
SHARCRASH (2021-01-11 22:47:02+00:00): + tags corrected
eggie (2021-01-11 23:21:13+00:00): Dag K Braat  Dit is echt een chaos geworden.
Alles loopt over elkaar heen. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=97332651

Ik zal even kijken of of er iets te herstellen is zodat de weg loopt als je bedoelt.


MVG,
eggie
eggie (2021-01-11 23:26:09+00:00): Ik draai het eerst even terug, want het was als construction al juist ingetekend door mapper A67 A67
eggie (2021-01-11 23:27:33+00:00): reverted by changeset #97333527

De tagging zal ik overzetten naar de wegen op constructie.
eggie (2021-01-11 23:41:18+00:00): Is dat westelijke fietspad al opengesteld naar de Molenweg? 
Staat er werkelijk een slingerhek voor fietsers op de Molenweg zelf of staat dat wellicht op het fietspad?

De wegdelen die op constructie stonden heb ik opengezet. Dat was eigenlijk het enige dat je hoefde te doen. Dus niet opnieuw alles eroverheen tekenen. 
Je moet maar eens kijken. Let op.. Er loopt ook een fietsroute.. dus niet onderbreken.
MVG
eggie
kbraat (2021-01-12 20:51:11+00:00): De Molenweg loopt vanuit de Vorendseindseweg dood, er staat een groot hek. Vanuit de richting Rucphen staat et een slingerhek daar waar ik deze aangegeven heb en loopt de Molenweg over in fietspad. Ben er vanochtend nog overheen gefietst, staat ook een mooie houten vangrail tussen de rondweg en het fietspad.
eggie (2021-01-12 21:11:41+00:00): Dag kbraat.. Het is al door jezelf aangepast en A67 A67 heeft noexit=yes toegevoegd vlak voor de afrastering.
Het is weer actueel zo.!
Zo met elkaar komen we er wel.

Dat slingerhek was gesneuveld met de revert. Vandaar mijn vraag. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-12 21:13:52+00:00): .. en er loopt zelfs al een wandelroute 57-82 over het nieuwe fietspad.
eggie (2021-01-11 23:45:10+00:00): Wanneer het gravel betreft kun je toevoegen
tracktype=grade2
gr eggie
felipeeugenio (2021-01-11 23:29:40+00:00): Hola
Pero borraste todo. cuál es la idea?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97333117
kunyasobe (2021-01-11 23:32:52+00:00): No, no borré todo. Pero subo el edificio en un segundo.
Robert Whittaker (2021-02-06 19:29:35+00:00): Could you have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894413064 -- which you created in this change-set, and tagged with disused=building and amenity=place_of_worship. Is the building still in use as a church or not?

Also there's an additional amenity=place_of_worship node inside the building footprint https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2296331060 . That should be removed if the church is now represented as a way/area.
woodpeck_repair (2021-03-31 06:45:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 102020319, 102013660, 102017051, 102013098, 102011378, 102025540, 102016336, 102012763, 102015297, 102022908, 102027001, 102011893, 102014416, 102018345, 102009137, 102015795, 102012305, 102030139, 102028531, 102024191, 102013937, 102019227, 102017661, 102014727, 102021580, 102013409, 102014180 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed Kosu77 imports
user_5359 (2021-01-12 05:10:52+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! A street isn't a list of node with place=rpivate way. I connect your points, please check the result.
Please also noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
user_5359 (2021-01-12 04:58:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
jmapb (2021-01-18 19:25:00+00:00): Howdy TBI, what criteria do you use for bicycle=designated? I left this as =yes because I didn't see any bike-specific signage or lane markings.
TheBestIdea (2021-01-18 19:47:33+00:00): I changed it to =designated because it’s on the official NYC bike map (http://nyc.gov/bikemap) and the road is generally closed to vehicular traffic (outside of smorgasbord venders). I agree that generally, I want to see signage, but given the totally of circumstances here, I think the official map is enough. I’m open to arguments the other way but it seemed off to me that, for example, it wasn’t even a dashed line in the Citibike map.
jmapb (2021-01-18 20:55:27+00:00): No arguments here, just looking to standardize. I think the city bike map (not the Citibike map!) is a good enough authority unless it's explicitly contradicted by conditions on the ground. 

I updated the tagging on the =yes sections of Center Drive and Wellhouse Drive to =designated to match.

(I didn't know the Citibike map was using OSM. Neato.)
Patr1k_P (2021-11-20 17:37:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894427481

tieto 3 pristresky nie su verejne, takze do mapy moc nepatria
vmicho (2021-11-21 11:43:27+00:00): zdravim. No pristresky nemusia byt dostupne ani verejne, nic sa tam o tom nepise. Ale pomenil som to trochu : 1 som zmenil na roof, a n 2 co su pre auta som dal access private.
Patr1k_P (2021-11-21 12:22:18+00:00): v kazdom pripade ak su pri rodinnom dome, tak budu najskor sukromne..ine je ked je pristresok niekde v prirode
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 14:35:17+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 12172492 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 19:18:43+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 12172490
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 23:43:55+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 12172491
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 23:44:42+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 12172493
Frans S (2021-01-13 11:34:03+00:00): Hello. A remark
I invalidated quite a number of tasks where you mapped on. 
Repeating issue: Not squared rectangular buildings.
Pleas improve your mappings.
This document might help.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
blackboxlogic (2021-01-16 00:20:31+00:00): HI, thanks for your edits. You named way 894430736 "Owned by Town of Wells" but that doesn't sound like a name. Maybe consider "owner=Town of Wells" instead?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97335188
bxl-forever (2021-01-14 14:04:12+00:00): Hello,
Your changeset creates multiple validation issues.
When a footway crosses a road, it must intersect it (i.e. it should have a node in common).
I see you are using iD, the simple online editor, I guess it lets you do that.
I will try to fix what I can.
Warin61 (2021-01-14 23:55:58+00:00): Boundary relations have 'roles' ... you have not assigned some of these. 
Some boundary relations are 'broken' - not forming a closed area. 

I have fixed the following 2 relations - Bar Beach  and Merewether
blackboxlogic (2021-01-16 00:24:07+00:00): I added an address node. You added a building with the same address in the same place (which is far better). Instead of having two elements with the same address, please feel free to delete the address node as it isn't needed any longer (as long as the address details are on the new building).
Please ask if you have questions. And welcome to OSM - Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97336477
booktiger (2021-06-27 15:03:10+00:00): 您好，请不要把规划中的道路和建筑物画到地图上，以免误导地图使用者！在这里画上不存在的道路并不会让它更快建成！！！
欢迎加入OSM爱好者QQ群：290278518
felipeeugenio (2021-01-12 14:15:24+00:00): Hola
Muchos usuarios se han incorporado ultimamente a agregar solamente cámaras de seguridad. Es por algún proyecto o trabajo municipal?
saludos
DressyPear4 (2021-01-13 15:56:51+00:00): Olá, por que alterar a classificação das vias existentes, e por que deletar essas áreas de lavouras do mapa?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97338825
user_5359 (2021-01-12 04:56:35+00:00): Hello! Please don't add addr:postcode to a street. Inside USA is tiger:zip_left and tiger:zip_right the standard key for this information, outside postal_code.
wireguy (2021-01-12 18:25:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM ecosiagorg!   Thanks for mapping buildings.   Quick tip, press 'Q' key when a building is selected and it will square the corners.   Looks much nicer.  Keep mapping!
ecosiaorg (2021-01-12 20:49:40+00:00): Aha! Sorry about that. Will do that from now on! Thanks!
Carnildo (2021-01-12 09:04:14+00:00): You added a building labeled a "hanger" near Memaloose Airport, but it doesn't show up in any imagery.  Where did you get it from?
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-14 08:18:16+00:00): 	Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
Please correct it...

Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
user_5359 (2021-01-12 15:26:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
justaslm (2021-01-15 05:14:51+00:00): #Naksha2021
tastrax (2021-01-18 22:41:01+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
btwhite92 (2021-12-08 01:33:49+00:00): Hello,
Why did J5 get dropped to service here?
abvincen (2021-12-08 10:33:03+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the error.
Apologies for changing the highway tag of "J5" to service road, it is an honest mistake from my end.
I have made the necessary corrections in the changeset #114696204 and changed "J5" back to secondary road.
Thanks again, I'll ensure to not make such mistakes going forward.

Regards,
abvincen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97342891
user_5359 (2021-01-12 15:25:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
ndm (2021-01-12 22:21:43+00:00): You really ought to look at the existing map data before you start editing and align your imagery with existing data.
ndm (2021-01-12 22:22:01+00:00): I've redrawn the service roads
amanura (2021-01-14 03:08:07+00:00): Thanks for looking into our edits. Apologies for the misalignment. It is good to see the community improvising our edits. Going forward, I will make sure to prioritize the vicinity over the clear imagery. Thanks for your suggestions. Always happy to learn from the community.
Aswin Narayanan (2021-01-15 15:51:55+00:00): Squaring the building would be better.
karson_ (2021-07-04 15:13:29+00:00): You shouldn't tag a road with both highway=residential and construction=residential. This makes it so that it is more difficult to determine whether the road is actually there, or is under construction. If a routing engine sees the construction=* tag, it may assume that the road is under construction, regardless of the highway=* tag.
limmmoh (2021-07-05 09:58:37+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your valuable inputs.
Apologies for tagging the road as 'highway=residential' and 'construction=residential'.
I've made the necessary changes in the changeset #107430412.
Thanks once again, looking forward to learn more from you!

Regards,
limmmoh.
parsd51 (2021-01-13 18:24:17+00:00): Hej mikkolukas

En lille detalje, i det store arbejde, som jeg faldt over da jeg læste om shoulder på wiki’en: Der er kun shoulder no en option, ikke none.
Såvidt jeg har set bruges generelt kun no i OSM.

Hilsen
parsd51