piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Super-Map (2017-06-22 13:25:20+00:00): hI Zibi-importy,

I work on OSMCha for to improve OSM. I saw your "Changeset". You have deleted intentionally all node with an address for to put all tag on each buildings. It's useless, all tag was, apparently, good... By advance thanks for your understanding (by this gesture, we haven't traces of the original history).
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-06-22 22:08:41+00:00): Sorry, but I disagree.with you. And this way of making imports is accepted by Polish OSM community.
RicoElectrico (2017-06-23 08:00:18+00:00): I think this integration of addrress nodes with building outlines is OK.
Владимир К (2018-03-14 11:40:04+00:00): Hi Zibi-importy!

I see, you use addr:place incorrectly. You should use addr:city for any type of locality: hamlet, village, town and so on.

Addr:place tag was invented exactly for addresses without addr:street.

Please, watch
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:place

This should be corrected everywhere.
Владимир К (2018-03-14 11:42:33+00:00): sorry, my fault. i saw addr:street only in one place. I'l fix it.
Владимир К (2018-03-14 11:49:38+00:00): or wont fix :) http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/x03
there https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%C5%81ukasz%20%7C%20Yanosik
added add:street and changed housenumbers. So we need to revert this changes or remove addr:place tag and correct add:street to addr:street.  I dont know whicht is more correct,
gscholz (2018-04-12 05:07:38+00:00): Hola,
this changeset has created osm errors regarding self intersecting ways and others:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-63.26045&lat=-32.38272&zoom=16&opacity=0.70

Can you please fix this? May be you can also review your mapping style for areas like "landuse"? You seem to create a lot of sytematical errors.

Saludos
Guido
gscholz (2018-04-12 05:11:20+00:00): Hola,
you can get an error overview for your mapping area here:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-63.25738&lat=-32.56372&zoom=9&opacity=0.70

Saludos
Guido
freebeer (2018-12-17 20:56:17+00:00): hallo nochmal

here you have deleted a connection road that is present in TIGER 2018, and plainly visible with detached accompanying pedestrian pavement, even if it appears there may be an access barrier for motorised vehicles.  this had recently been added to the map.

can i ask your motivation in deleting this when it is clearly seen to be present, and apears to give access to an unmapped track?  unless the imagery is two years outdated...

tanks
SABiltongHunter (2018-12-17 21:00:29+00:00): Freebeer, Were these comments meant for another editor, these don't make sense for this edit? Thanks
freebeer (2018-12-18 00:06:19+00:00): checks changeset number...
pops it into
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=49732750

no, this is the right changeset - the aerial imagery i used was Mapbox, which you can select under
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=49732750#map=18/41.36462/-81.44330
as it is probably the sharpest of all imageries.

i probably did not express meself well above, though.

that was as far as i went reviewing your changes, as i was satisfied you were not systematically damaging things ;-)
j03lar50n (2017-06-22 02:19:41+00:00): wow, looking better in DT SLO!
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-22 21:14:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 49756926, 49755317 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 49732988 to 49733684 by user Negjana. This was an undiscussed mechanical edit. Please read the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. It explains what to do to reduce the risk that your mechanical edits get reverted.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-22 21:14:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 49756926, 49755317 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 49732988 to 49733684 by user Negjana. This was an undiscussed mechanical edit. Please read the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. It explains what to do to reduce the risk that your mechanical edits get reverted.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-22 21:14:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 49756926, 49755317 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 49732988 to 49733684 by user Negjana. This was an undiscussed mechanical edit. Please read the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. It explains what to do to reduce the risk that your mechanical edits get reverted.
Supaplex (2017-06-22 12:22:47+00:00): 你為什麼要刪除樹木呢？
Supaplex (2017-07-09 18:01:20+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2017-06-22 03:26:00+00:00): 不是建築攸
zluuzki (2022-01-30 13:23:25+00:00): 4 Jahre zu spät aber ... Revert rein aus Prinzip? Ernsthaft?
gormo (2017-06-22 13:59:14+00:00): Did you discuss this large-scale mechanical edit with some OSM (sub-)community? Could you please link to the relevant discussion where there was consensus on your worldwide changes?
Nakaner (2017-06-22 19:29:50+00:00): revert started
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-22 21:14:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 49756926, 49755317 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 49732988 to 49733684 by user Negjana. This was an undiscussed mechanical edit. Please read the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. It explains what to do to reduce the risk that your mechanical edits get reverted.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-22 21:14:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 49756926, 49755317 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 49732988 to 49733684 by user Negjana. This was an undiscussed mechanical edit. Please read the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. It explains what to do to reduce the risk that your mechanical edits get reverted.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-22 21:14:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 49756926, 49755317 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets 49732988 to 49733684 by user Negjana. This was an undiscussed mechanical edit. Please read the Automated Edits Code of Conduct. It explains what to do to reduce the risk that your mechanical edits get reverted.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-06-22 07:01:02+00:00): This edit covers a large area, and this looks like an automated edit. Please refrain from doing large-scale edits like this without discussion. This needs to be reverted.
Nakaner (2017-06-22 19:29:37+00:00): revert started
Negjana (2017-08-28 18:06:06+00:00): tell me why we need highspeed=no?
alee_m (2019-03-04 05:44:44+00:00): "Hi Yunita sari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, came across 
way 502512465
way 502512437
way 502512460  classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery this seems to be 'residential'

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
gileri (2017-06-25 16:13:24+00:00): Bonjour,

Les conteneurs de verre en ville n'acceptent que les flacons/bocaux/bouteilles alimentaires en verre; le tag recycling:glass ne s'applique donc pas
wambacher (2017-06-23 11:34:39+00:00): please DO NEVER EVER remove type=boundary from boundary relations. This tag is very important to osm.
Supaplex (2017-07-09 18:01:56+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Super-Map (2017-06-22 15:31:43+00:00): Hi Riyadi Wibowo,

I saw your work on this Changeset, you have deleted voluntary few buildings for, apparently, bad drawing.  In this case, delete in a specific Changeset with a special comment. Before that, leave a message for the "owner" of this "mistake"...
By advance thanks for your understanding.

Have a nice day.
iandees (2017-07-23 00:38:57+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50491390
iandees (2017-07-23 00:38:49+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50491390
alzyee (2018-01-28 23:45:19+00:00): It looks like the Riesbecks (502540383, v1) building you added is the outline of the parking lot. Has the building been enlarged to that size?
Dalkvist (2017-06-27 09:32:15+00:00): Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre. 

Om du har några funderingar så får du gärna skicka ett meddelande till mig.
mueschel (2017-06-23 12:14:05+00:00): Hi,
the 198 objects you added here contain some rather strange tags:
CODE=WALL
COLOUR_NU=16
GROUP=BuildingL
LENGTH=22.406
NUMBER=1025
TYPE=Line
Where these added by mistake or is there some useful information contained?

Cheers, Jan
Alan (2017-06-22 17:00:59+00:00): That may be true, but that doesn't necessarily make it a park. If it's a park, what is its name? What government entity administers it? If it's a true park, it should be possible to answer these questions. If you can't answer them, then it's not a park, and something like landuse=grass is more appropriate. From what I can tell online, it's not officially part of the nearby Fish Creek Provincial Park.

I notice that some of the adjacent grassy parcels nearby are tagged with leisure=common. Perhaps that is a better compromise tag for areas that are not official parks, but are used like parks? (They should also probably have the landuse=grass tag in addition). 

Because I don't have local knowledge here, I won't revert this change back to landuse=grass, but I encourage you and other local mappers to do some research into the correct tags for these areas.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:55:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
user_5359 (2018-01-26 08:13:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. If you change from bing to Esri or DigitalGlobal aerial images, you can see the first highways and buildings.
manoharuss (2017-06-22 07:16:53+00:00): Hi HairbyLanceLanza,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But please do not personalize the map with personal information. This map is for everybody. Please use http://learnosm.org/en/ to get started about mapping practices and tagging schema. 

Thank you,

Manohar
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-06-22 06:48:19+00:00): [Summitville, Putatan, Muntinlupa] add new Alfamart branch
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-06-22 06:50:52+00:00): [Makati/barangays] spell out "Sto." in "Sto. Rosario-Kanluran" (to be consistent with its administrative boundary, spelled Santo Rosario-Kanluran, and its adjacent barangay, Santo Rosario-Silangan)
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-06-22 06:55:17+00:00): [Nueva, San Pedro, Laguna] add two new 7-Eleven branches
RichRico (2017-06-23 18:52:13+00:00): Hi Morgane Bauge
Thanks for contributing with OSM
I found a changeset where you changed a tag in a highway that according with satellite imageries isn't a railway.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5109118/history
Maybe you have a another explanation for this change.
Regards
sabas88 (2017-06-22 10:55:45+00:00): E si trova sempre qualcosa che manca :-)
Commodoortje (2017-06-22 13:54:23+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-06-22 13:54:54+00:00): Wat bedoel je met de aangebrachte refs?
bijvoorbeeld: ref=VWc
Roland Cuijpers (2017-06-23 07:02:49+00:00): Hallo, VWc betekent in de infrastuctuur Verbindingsweg C.
Ik hoop hierop op uw vraag beantwoord te hebben.
MvG
user_5359 (2017-06-22 15:03:47+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Behinderten gerechte Toiletten auf dem Parkplatz?? Kann ich davon mal ein Foto haben?
Chieftl (2017-06-22 09:43:50+00:00): Добрий день
Дякуюємо, що додали садовий центр на карту.
Але треба уточнити: "урочище водоканал" - це справжня офіційна адреса?
GerdP (2017-09-05 14:04:42+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you have added quite a lot
of ways with highway=services
Many of them are not service areas, so I assume you meant highway=service instead.
See http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/
and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservices
eggie (2017-06-24 07:19:26+00:00): Info merged with BAG addressnode.
eggie (2017-06-24 07:19:44+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
user_5359 (2017-06-22 19:35:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because I see only residential buildings on the aerial images.
Thomas8122 (2017-06-22 15:56:11+00:00): Wusste nicht das Kathmandu in Bischofswerda liegt
oormilavinod (2017-06-23 05:52:51+00:00): 
hey крокус !! welcome to OSM. I observed that you have pulled a road causing  bad angled roads. please make sure you be  little more careful while making edits. reverted this changeset happy mapping !!
Thomas8122 (2017-06-22 15:57:23+00:00): Definitiv nicht Kathmandu!
Peer van Daalen (2017-06-22 16:19:33+00:00): OK! Best regards | Peer
gileri (2017-06-25 16:09:08+00:00): Bonjour,

Passant là tous les jours, je confirme qu'il y a un poteau...
gileri (2017-06-25 16:10:59+00:00): Corrigé dans le changeset 49817430
xrt (2017-06-25 16:53:43+00:00): Vous avez  bien fait. En y repensant, car j'y passe souvent moi aussi, je me suis demandé si ce n'était pas la borne dans le tunnel. Mais vous avez été plus rapide. Autre chose, si vous passez souvent ici, sur la carte apparait au Nord du quai de Serbie au fond de la place de stationnement voitures, au 3, un arrêt de bus qui ne semble pas exister. A ma place l'enlèveriez-vous? http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=49741795#map=24/45.77205/4.84146
gileri (2017-06-29 21:59:29+00:00): En effet cet arrêt de bus n'existe pas, j'ai vérifié :
https://framapic.org/JQZmDywIcR4H/vs9cZwAgXFIA.jpg

Du coup je l'ai retiré et j'en ai profité pour ajouter des détails
Chetan_Gowda (2017-06-23 05:47:19+00:00): Hi darkMegaLord, Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You can start learn to edit using https://learnosm.org. To add which type of crops grow in farm fields you can check these wiki's:
1.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland
2.https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crop 
Regards,
Chetan
oormilavinod (2017-06-23 05:15:27+00:00): hey Dylanacessna welcome to OSM, i have observerd that you have tsgged a military base as a residential. please make sure you go through the osm wiki before you make edits to important places. i have reverting this change set.  happy mapping .
Commodoortje (2017-06-23 03:08:15+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-06-23 03:13:41+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik je toevoeging gewijzigd.
Er vanuitgaande dat er een bord "fietspad" staat
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49760549
Het is gebruikelijk in dit soort situaties dat er een paaltje staat zodat auto's geen doorgang hebben. (barrier=bollard) 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:barrier
mueschel (2017-06-28 11:44:34+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it has many strange tags:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4930534149

Cheers, Jan
Super-Map (2017-06-22 12:30:04+00:00): Bonjour plecocq,

Je travail pour OSMCha pour améliorer OSM (la qualité). J'ai remarqué que vous avez ajouté des tags dans ce Changeset. J'aimerai attiré votre attention sur le faite que lorsque vous indiquez que c'est une barrier "level=0" n'existe pas, ce n'est pas correct. Il faut indiquer la hauteur (approximative) de cette dernière, si celle-ci est comprise entre 50cm et 1m alors les tags seront les suivants: "barrier=wall; "height=1". Si la hauteur est comprise entre 1 et 2m, vous indiquez à nouveau la hauteur: "height=2". Merci pour votre compréhension et de votre aide. Bonne continuation.
oormilavinod (2017-06-23 05:36:50+00:00): 
hey ibsalam!! welcome to OSM. I observed that you have pulled a road causing  bad angled roads. please make sure you be  little more careful while making edits. happy mapping !!
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
nammala (2017-06-23 05:43:16+00:00): Hi,

The swimming pool should be tagged as `leisure=swimming_pool` instead of natural=water tag.
Happy Mapping

Regards,
nammala
demon_box (2017-06-22 20:31:39+00:00): ciao Ferruccio, vedi commento al tuo precedente changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49748615
grazie.
eggie (2017-06-23 21:02:27+00:00): Een park heeft een naam. name=,,,,,,
Een park leg je helemaal los over alles heen zonder te plakken als een soort deken.

Een park geef je aan met leisure=park

Leisure betekent de functie en landuse is wat je ziet. dat zijn twee verschillende zaken.
Ik zal deze changeset terugdraaien. Je kunt je vragen ook kwijt op het forum van osm. Dan krijg je hulp. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Het commentaar op een eigen changeset ziet iemand alleen bij toeval.
eggie (2017-06-23 21:05:34+00:00): reverted due to ignorance.
eggie (2017-06-23 21:08:26+00:00): Dit is een voorbeeld van een park. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80584/4.66761
Leisure=park ligt er helemaal los overheen. Ook over het water. Het is een soort transparant. 
Stel je voor op het forum. Daar word je zeker verder geholpen. Je edits liggen gezien het verleden nog wel onder een vergrootglas.
eggie (2017-06-23 21:10:05+00:00): Verder zou ik dit bos gewoon zo laten of het moet echt een parknaam hebben.
SK53 (2017-06-25 13:30:11+00:00): Hi, Just noticed your edits (nice adding the stuff up behind Woodhouse Park). You dont need to add foot=yes to a bridleway, particularly one with a designation tag: it's implicit in OSM that a highway=bridleway allows pedestrians, just as a highway=cycleway does in the UK (but not everywhere). Cycling on bridleways is always a bit more complex so adding the access permission makes sense (as it does on footpaths which allow cycling but which are not true cycleways). HTH
SomeoneElse (2017-06-26 15:15:04+00:00): FWIW, personally I'd always add foot=yes to "public bridleways" like this one so that someone (or more likely some router) unfamiliar with designation tags can figure out access rules.
Cheers,
Andy
mueschel (2017-06-24 20:25:20+00:00): Hi,
you used the key "ScientificName" on some nodes - in OSM we have the tag "species" (as well as "genus") for that. If you want to tag the English name of the species, you can use "species:en".

Jan
SK53 (2017-06-29 22:21:06+00:00): Also the key taxon (effectively synonymous with species a lot of the time, but most useful when cultivars come into play as with many stree trees)
FatPhil (2017-06-22 14:00:38+00:00): Hostel already existed in that building.
SomeoneElse (2017-06-22 13:30:35+00:00): Unfortunately, and surprising as it meay seem, wikipedia isn't actually a valid source for OSM!
Joxit (2017-06-22 14:16:05+00:00): Okay, is the world factbook good enough for OSM?
SomeoneElse (2017-06-22 14:27:17+00:00): No idea - what licence is it made available under?
Joxit (2017-06-22 14:33:18+00:00): It's in the public domain. Here is the statement : 
The Factbook is in the public domain. Accordingly, it may be copied freely without permission of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/docs/contributor_copyright.html
SomeoneElse (2017-06-22 15:32:34+00:00): That'd be OK licence-wise, sure.  I'm not entirely convinced about the need for "square kilometer" values (since they're derivable from the boundaries) but, meh.
hihiro (2017-06-22 13:16:13+00:00): 一般道(2車線未満)が主要地方道路の接続路より上側に表示される。普通であれば一般道路が下側に表示されれば良いのだが。
他の箇所も同じような表示になっている箇所もあるので、これで仕方ないのか。
Sanniu (2017-07-14 17:50:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502668846 is not connected to anything else, thus excludes it from pedestrian routing, can you connect to surrounding streets, where appropriate?
Ynhockey (2017-07-14 18:25:42+00:00): Hi, I admit I don't use OSM for navigation, so things like that could occur in my changesets. I have added a number of new paths for this central square (it's accessible from all directions).
Sanniu (2017-07-14 18:27:13+00:00): Thanks:)
Zverik (2017-06-22 19:37:57+00:00): Hi, you've broken some coastlines with this edit. I have fixed it, but please use an editor that check for such errors, like JOSM.
crazycaterpillar (2017-06-23 06:07:25+00:00): hi, thanks, I thought I had checked the ways I modified.
Cascafico (2017-06-23 08:32:58+00:00): Hai sovrapposto la ciclabile alla strada. La ciclabile è una corsia separata solo da striscia oppure è separata (cordolo, marciapiede...?
Sanniu (2017-06-25 14:15:25+00:00): Hi. You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502683882 that overlaps existing street with another name. Which one is right?
Alecs01 (2017-06-24 16:33:45+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, la regola fondamentale è che si mappa ciò che esiste nella realtà, ho corretto i terreni agricoli tra Meda e Seregno che avevi cambiato in leisure=park http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark tieni presente anche di non attaccare l'uso del suolo alla strada che lo delimita, la strada è rappresentata da una linea che passa al suo centro. Ciao e buona continuazione!
Tia2591 (2017-06-26 09:26:42+00:00): Ciao Alecs01 e grazie per il benvenuto! Quei terreni sono si agricoli, ma fanno parte anche del Parco della Brianza Centrale, nello specifico quella zona è nota come Parco agricolo Meredo http://www.provincia.mb.it/Temi/turismo/itemById.do?id=1806
Come sarebbe meglio segnalare la zona? 
Grazie per i consigli!
Alecs01 (2017-06-27 20:22:18+00:00): Ciao, direi qualcosa del genere https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3407909 o https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4008615 che credo siano simili, vedi anche qui http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=protected%20area
user_5359 (2017-06-22 15:07:01+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! So wie Du es eingetragen hast, ist jetzt dort ein Restaurant ohne Namen. Das widerspricht aber etwas Deinen Changesetkommentar. Wenn dort kein Restaurant existiert, dann schrieb bitte ein disused:amenity=restaurant und ein disused:name=Check in rein.
oormilavinod (2017-06-23 05:28:34+00:00): 
hey Bishnu Bhattarai !! welcome to OSM. I observed that you have pulled a road causing  bad angled roads. please make sure you be  little more careful while making edits. happy mapping !!
opendcc (2021-01-18 10:07:52+00:00): Hallo,

im Neubaugebiet Bauwiesenring liegen Hydranten 'im Gebäude', könntet Ihr das überprüfen und ev. richtigstellen? Danke
chillly (2017-06-22 14:22:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Thanks for the edit.

I have a couple of comments. It would be usual to use building=house when you know it's a house. Postcodes have a space in them: HU17 7EN. Postcodes are especially useful for routing and satnavs, so getting the format right helps.

If you have any questions please feel free to ask.
chillly (2017-06-22 15:09:52+00:00): Looking at this again, Is Church Road in Beverley or Molescroft? If it is Molescroft then the addr:city should be Molescroft. The term 'city' is a bit confusing. It gets used for any place, so the houses in a village would get addr:city set to the village name.