piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-01-17 12:20:40+00:00): Not Lund, but down from Littlebeck
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-01-17 12:43:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 97636109 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mech edit.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4691 .  Revert is to status quo ante; of the ones I've checked ti-lo is right half the time and Adamant1 about half, but an undiscussed mech. edit is not the way to resolve.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
TheNet1996 (2021-01-17 17:17:51+00:00): Hi,
auch hier sind alle building:levels-Werte falsch.
Viele Grüße
Mike
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:29:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-01-17 13:00:24+00:00): For completeness, for the benefit of anyone seeing this comment without context, the changeset comment here "vandalism repaired, watch the guy who did this" is somewhat dishonest, or at the very least does not tell the whole story.
Some of what happened is described on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48860050 .  More generally both ti-lo and Adamant1 have tried to push "their" vision of how certain things should be tagged through mechanical edits.  I've checked a sample of the data, and it appears that neither is correct in every case.  Neither set of changes is strictly speaking "vandalism" either since both believe that their changes (and only their changes) are valid.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:26:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-01-17 12:43:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 97633078, 97633111, 97633163, 97633249, 97633301, 97633349, 97633449, 97633543, 97633573, 97633611, 97633639, 97633665, 97633732, 97633765, 97633821, 97633867, 97633914, 97634024, 97634100, 97634151, 97634185, 97634565, 97634596, 97634840, 97634919, 97634945, 97634974, 97635040, 97635137, 97635181, 97635235, 97635265, 97635283, 97635308, 97635524, 97635640, 97635678, 97635722, 97635799, 97635836.
eggie (2021-01-17 14:03:51+00:00): Dag wipr.. 

Je vraagt om een review. Je hebt hier een strook bos weggehaald, maar geeft aan een prima karrespoor.
Dat zou je kunnen intekenen met highway=track
tracktype=grade  3 of 4  
Zie wiki
tracktype
Er ontbreken hier wel meer karresporen zie ik. De Dodedreef?

MVG
eggie
wipr (2021-01-17 14:43:41+00:00): Klopt, dat probeerde ik ook maar toen kwam ik erachter dat de stippellijntjes in het hele gebied missen dus toen heb ik het maar zo gelaten.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
blackboxlogic (2021-01-17 13:12:48+00:00): Your note="Grounds owned by Pine Island Camp..." might be more appropriate as owner="Pine Island Camp" since structured data is easier for data consumers.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97636197
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:38:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:29:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:26:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Dino Michelini (2021-01-17 16:06:36+00:00): Ciao Roberto, le modifiche apportate alla relazione non sono coerenti. A) il percorso era circolare (roundtrip=yes) ora è aperto; B) ieri nel primo pomeriggio facendo un nuovo rilievo ho seguito i segnavia che salvo rarissimi casi ricalcava il precedente percorso con inizio-fine in via fontana vecchia; ora inizia dalla fontana vecchia finisce in via Sottocantine e ci sono tratti sparsi e non consecutivi tra la piazza, via dei bastioni e nuovamente via fontana vecchia) vedi il profilo altimetrico https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11353673) e in questo nuovo percorso nel tratto tra via del lavatoio e piazza Claudia non sono visibili segnavia. C) se ora il percorso non è circolare va cancellato il roundtrip=yes e aggiornati i relativi dati; d) a mio parere cosi come modificato non mi sembra abbia molto senso: non arriva in piazza Claudia e non si congiunge con il 176G.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
iWowik (2021-01-26 19:58:23+00:00): Вечер добрый!

Вы поставили название двум участкам.
При этом дома по ней имеют имеют адрес не по улице Корчагина, а по улице 3-я Анганорская улица.
Например https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8259038825

Похоже, что где-то закралась ошибка.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
DD1GJ (2021-01-17 14:37:48+00:00): revert, der ursprüngliche Zustand war besser. Bitte nicht unnötig löschen und mit Informationsverlust neu zeichnen.
akkusm (2021-01-17 19:18:26+00:00): ı mapped.
maraf24 (2021-03-20 13:37:20+00:00): Węzły nie mają nazw na tablicach.
TheNet1996 (2021-01-17 17:16:53+00:00): Hallo nagelpinter,
Willkommen bei OSM und Danke, dass du die Karten mit verbessern möchtest.

Mir sind jedoch deine Eintragungen etwas schleierhaft. Z.B. besteht das Haus Uhlandstr. 36 aus 2 Stockwerken und einem weiteren Dachgeschoss - du hast aber building:levels=1 angegeben was völlig falsch ist. Das gleiche gilt für die Nachbarhäuser.

Du kannst das hier nachlesen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:levels?uselang=de

Viele Grüße
Mike
ALu68 (2021-01-17 18:11:29+00:00): Es gibt auch schicke Bilder auf  Mapillary: 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.3586443&lng=10.869722599972222&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=syzJ0Lbo5HFJCxRWIQV8pw

Gruß. Andre
DD1GJ (2021-01-17 14:31:26+00:00): Hallo davgro,

willkommen bei OSM. Es ist nicht so optimal, standig Geäude zu löschen, die perfekt nach amtlichen Unterlagen eingezeichnet waren. Hier handelte es sich um unterschiedliche Gebäudeteile mit teilweise unterschiedlichen Höhen und auch Innenhöfen.

Da ist es zielführender, nur einen Punkt zu setzen oder nur das Hauptgebäude (Verwaltung) mit dem Namen und vor allem mit dem tag der Branche (hier Spedition) zu kennzeichnen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dlogistics

An einer anderen Stelle bringt es wenig "AUTOHAUS SIEMON (Siemon GmbH)" hinzuschreiben. Übertriebene Großschreibweise ist verpönt und der Eintrag wird von anderen Anwendungen Bei der Suche nach Autohäusern oder Werkstätten nicht gefunden. Ideal wären zwei getrennte Punkte mit shop=car und shop=car_repair an den entsprechenden Stellen. Der Name sollte so kurz wie möglich ohne Rechtsform sein. Das xyz GmbH & Co. KG kann dann bei operator angegeben werden.

Weitere Informationen findest Du z.B. unter 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
zuicz (2021-01-17 14:00:26+00:00): Przystopuj troszkę z tymi edycjami proszę
Według wiki Park duża otwarta przestrzeń, przewidziana głównie do użytku wypoczynkowo-rekreacyjnego, zwykle zaprojektowana w stanie pół naturalnym z trawiastymi obszarami, drzewami i krzewami, ścieżkami, ławkami. Może zawierać utwardzone place, pomniki, place zabaw, boiska, a nawet budynki (toalety,restauracje itp.). Parki są często, ale nie zawsze komunalne, zazwyczaj otwarte dla publiczności, ale mogą być ogrodzone i czasowo zamknięte, np. w porze nocnej.
Parkami nie są:
tereny przeznaczone głównie do uprawiania sportów lub aktywnego wypoczynku (patrz landuse=recreation_ground)
place zabaw
trawniki (patrz landuse=grass)
kwietniki (patrz landuse=flowebed)
zieleń izolacyjna wzdłuż ciągów komunikacyjnych
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-18 08:01:18+00:00): Hi AKASH ASHOK, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind reverting your map edits? Which "contributer list" do you mean? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
TrickyFoxy (2022-12-26 17:17:51+00:00): 👋 На каких снимках вы нашли эту подстанцию? openstreetmap.org/way/896175626
cyton (2021-02-03 20:13:22+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier die steinbrücke in/auf die turnhalle der schule getan, ich würd gern wissen warum. allerdings fällt mir auch kein passenderer ort ein, da das halt ein schulprojekt ist und kein laden wo man rein gehen kann. 
die telefonnummer und anschrift ist identisch mit der der schule selber, was auch sinn macht.
grauy (2021-02-03 20:21:19+00:00): Hallo, warum ich den Punkt gerade dort hingesetzt habe, kann ich mir gerade auch nicht mehr erklären. Vermutlich wäre es besser gewesen, zusätzlich einen Hinweis für Verbesserungsvorschläge dort zu platzieren.
mike140 (2021-01-26 08:03:36+00:00): с каких пор в Черкасской области горы? то что вы отмечаете как горные выршины, больше похоже на холмы для которых есть тег natural=hill. и вообще, стоит ли отмечать высоты, которые не имеют собственного имени? также существуют отдельные ресурсы отображающие высоты (горизонтали) на местности - попробуйте воспользоваться ими и не загружать OSM-карту ошибочными данными
Ivan Gurov (2021-01-26 09:20:15+00:00): Горы есть разных высот, то что они не высокие не говорит о том что их нет. Тег hill насколько я знаю не имеет отображения в осм рендеринге потому толку от него почти нет. По данным осмвики нет четкой разницы между этими ключами и это больше субьективная оценка чем конкретные критерии.
VARVAR8 (2021-01-26 12:41:54+00:00): там варто позабирати теги peak залишивши лиш ele. Схоже автор не читає вікі...
mike140 (2021-01-26 13:38:19+00:00): Если вы про сайт osm.org, то нам много чего не отображается, поскольку этот сайт носит ознакомительную функцию, либо как фон для отображения каких-либо объектов на других сайтах. Программы-навигаторы, которые люди используют на практике, берут из OSM-базы нужные для отображения объекты. Например,  программа OsmAnd прекрасно отображает холмы (hill). Так что не нужно мапить под рендер: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8F_%D0%BF%D1%96%D0%B4_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%80
Ivan Gurov (2021-01-26 15:15:05+00:00): Схоже ты не читал вики, я написал уже выше что в вики инфа о том что разница между этими ключами не определена и рассуждения на этот счет субьективщина.
A hill may be a natural=peak
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dhill
Вот определение ключа natural=peak The top (summit) of a hill or mountain. Что по нашем значит обозначение вершин гор и холмов.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dpeak
mike140 (2021-01-26 16:53:53+00:00): Назовите источник данных о высотах и каково практическое применение подобных данных в этой местности?
Ivan Gurov (2021-01-26 17:53:55+00:00): Это высотные данные SRTM1 с шагом в одну угловую секунду. Взяты с файлов для локуса от пользователя erelen за что ему спасибо.
https://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?s=&showtopic=210573&view=findpost&p=66704970
https://forum.velomania.ru/showthread.php?t=125221&page=224&p=6827847&viewfull=1#post6827847
Также некоторые расположения высот заданы лично мной при обходе местности.
Практическое применение элементарно для туризма, походов, ориентирования как минимум. ну а информация и статистика по рельефу это уже для заинтересованных.
Anton Khorev (2021-01-28 21:27:38+00:00): Здесь "горы(высоты)" называются в качестве примера того, что было удалено:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97639007

Могут найтись участники, которые снова не увидят гор и снова их удалят.

Увидеть, какие natural=peak существовали на момент окончания ваших правок в апреле 2020 можно таким запросом:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12U9

Так можно найти ещё и высоты, добавленные участником Вальдимар, позже удалённые участником Nikolaїch как "некорректные объекты", например: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6339636013
VARVAR8 (2021-01-17 14:17:13+00:00): Хлопче. Ти що усіх за ідіотів вважаєш? Порізав історію правок? Серйозно?
VARVAR8 (2021-01-17 14:18:37+00:00): Можеш не старатися. DWG - відновить. Автору - бан!!
Ivan Gurov (2021-01-17 14:21:53+00:00): Всех нет, только нескольких которые поудаляли тысячами данные которые я корпел два года и делал практически с ноля ходя по местности, теперь приходится торчать день чтоб восстановить с архива данные. Но ты то этого не знаешь
Anton Khorev (2021-01-17 14:28:25+00:00): Кто что поудалял и где что надо (было) восстановить?
Ivan Gurov (2021-01-17 14:39:49+00:00): Все я сейчас не скажу но из того что заметил это почти все поля(огороды) и горы(высоты) а также некоторые леса. Жаль скрин скинуть нельзя, показал бы пакеты правок подряд все с удалением
IlBano (2021-01-24 11:01:04+00:00): Ipotizzo che ti sia già molto chiaro che rimuovere o deturpare il lavoro degli altri mappatori non è tollerabile.
Se la motivazione poi è quella che hai esposto ancora meno. Puoi ripristinare per cortesia le footway che hai cancellato ? Ci vorrebbe il reverter di JOSM. Sai usarlo ?

Grazie
alessandrocarmeli (2021-01-24 11:45:48+00:00): ciao, sono elementi inutili che intralciano soltanto, si so usare josm
IlBano (2021-01-24 15:01:23+00:00): Ciao. Puoi avere le opinioni che ritieni, ma non cancelli il lavoro degli altri, perchè il metodo è discuterne prima con chi ha mappato secondo te in modo scorretto. Qui hai rimosso delle footway che sono elementi verificabili e riscontrabili sul territorio, oltre ad altri oggetti. Per me questo è un changeset da revertare.
alessandrocarmeli (2021-01-24 21:38:30+00:00): invece sencondo me va bene cosi. i miei changeset vengono spesso ripristinati senza che nessuna mi avverte
ivanbranco (2021-01-24 23:23:12+00:00): Ciao Alessandro, i dati riguardanti footway e kerb sono molto utili e importanti in quanto vengono utilizzati anche da persone con disabilità o a mobilità ridotta. Il tuo non mi sembra il comportamento giusto per un progetto collaborativo.
tastrax (2021-01-24 06:58:33+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
CRCulver (2021-01-26 19:13:39+00:00): What is your source for the name "Parc Amos Francu" for this playground in Andrei Mureseanu?