piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
george1201 (2022-10-21 22:38:10+00:00): Was ist denn die Linie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105379211 für eine Kante? Eine Klippe quer durch den Oberwald nach Rüppurr? Ich bin heute die Straße Am Rüppurrer Schloss gelaufen, von einer Kante habe ich gar nichts bemerkt. Wie hoch soll die sein?
george1201 (2022-10-21 22:42:24+00:00): Die verlinkten Artikel habe ich interessiert überflogen. An welcher Stelle der Linie kann ich denn die "plötzliche Höhenunterschiede von 1 bis 3 Metern" sehen?
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2022-10-22 10:26:26+00:00): Mach's wie ich ;-) als ich über einen der Links in Facebook gestolpert bin (die Tiefengeothermiegegner nehmen die Störung als Anlass, Gefahren zu sehen ...): Den Erlenweg entlang radeln und Gelände links und rechts vergleichen und feststellen, dass es (vom Norden her) links stets höher als rechts ist. Meist ist auch der Weg mehr oder weniger höher als rechts, das dürfte menschlicher Wegebau sein. Von "Am Rüppurrer Schloss" aus sieht man in der Tat nix, weil Sicht durch Gebüsch behindert und die Straße vom Mensch höher gelegt ist, wie auch der Resedenweg. Wenn man von dem bzw. Krokusweg die Kleingartenwege reinschaut, sieht man deutlich eine Stufe in den beiden Wegen. Nach den Kleingärten ist "Pause" durch menschliche Umformungen, ab Kirche geht es an der Alb weiter, wo wieder das Gelände "rechts" höher als "links" ist bis es vom Ettlinger Schuttkegel der Alb verschüttet ist, wie es in der Literatur steht. Menschliche Einflüsse mal unberücksichtigt, wie das Aufschütten der Friedhofserweiterung westlich der Alb. Kann sicher im Laufe der Zeit noch verfeinert werden, ist noch keine exakte Vermessung, weil man vom Rad aus nur entlang radelnd nicht alle Details sieht und nicht überall rankommt (insb. an der Alb, da Kante meist auf Privatgrund im Gebüsch), aber als erste Schätzung ...
Mir war der Effekt neu und ich war überrascht, wie gut man das im Gelände wahrnehmen kann nach Jahrtausenden noch, wenn man drauf achtet ... 
Wo aber die "bis zu" 3 m sein sollen, ist mir auch nicht ganz klar nach erster Besichtigung, daher nur geschätzten einen Meter drangehängt.
george1201 (2022-10-25 20:17:24+00:00): Ich bin jetzt den Erlenweg bis zu den Kleingärten abgelaufen.  Klar habe ich diese Böschung schon früher gesehen, aber nichts dabei gedacht. Jetzt sehe ich alles in einem anderen Licht. Die Fortsetzung am Westrand von Rüppurr an der Alb passt genau dazu (muss ich mir demnächst noch genauer anschauen). Alles bildet eine eindrucksvolle Line. 

Wirklich ein toller Beitrag zu OSM! Sehr gut die Links, bei denen man alles nachlesen kann. Vielen Dank, ich bin jetzt schlauer geworden.

PS: "Ettlinger Schuttkegel"? Kenne ich auch nicht. Fehlt da vielleicht noch ein Eintrag in OSM? :-)
PSS: 1 Meter Höhe ist gut. Sonst kommen womöglich im Winter noch Schlittenfahrer hierher, um diese "Klippe" runterzufahen :-)
MxxCon (2022-10-20 03:05:37+00:00): Hello.
What kind of "map detail improvement" did you do that covers the whole world?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127812322
yasslay (2022-10-20 08:43:18+00:00): I think that they just forgot to split the edits up into more local-sized areas, and Eflific please keep this in mind for the next time you edit as it is good mapping practice to keep your edits as small as possible.

Kind regards,
yasslay
silversurfer83 (2022-10-20 08:58:10+00:00): Hi,
thanks for improving the database.

When editing, please keep these things in mind:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
And please add the source of your changes, for example: "i did a survey"

cheers
Glassman (2022-10-21 22:45:05+00:00): #TIP: We don't use descriptive names in OSM. For example instead of name=Pasture, just tag it as  landuse=meadow + meadow=pasture. Can you review this edit and remove the descriptive names?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127812718
tastrax (2022-11-24 04:36:26+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Frans S (2022-11-14 16:02:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About mapping of fences.
There is no need to add a tag area=yes
Just barrier=hedge is sufficient.
Best regards
LockOnGuy (2022-10-20 06:58:38+00:00): Hello ڕاستی, in this changeset you deleted NODE: 8566603018 and made it as WAY: 778655038 , but you only added the Kurdish name from the node to the way and ignored the name:ar and name:en. I've asked you many times before that when you change the name, do not remove the Arabic and other names entirely. Now no people can search for this park in Arabic and it will not show.
Glassman (2022-10-21 22:46:23+00:00): #TIP: We spell out street names in OSM. The reason is that routers have a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127813094
Glassman (2022-10-21 22:48:00+00:00): #TIP: The building outline should match the imagery and not the whole parcel. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127813115
SekeRob (2022-10-21 05:39:56+00:00): Hi,

I've done that before and then the original mapper who left these tagless ways removed the tags again.. Think pedestrian tag on pedestrian area is the better tagging as it render it makes them invisible.

ciao

cheers.
SekeRob (2022-10-26 05:48:24+00:00): Hi,

Case you read this, Bea has been reversing the path tags again so the island car and island all have started to reappear again in my OSMI list for the stuff I fixed. Even the paths I added few days ago from paths to entrances have changed to tagless lines again. Clearly rules seem not to apply here, laughing stock if you ask me.

ciao from Italy who was foolish enough to correct a typo in wheelchair in level0 editor not aware of the stat here, which is when the issues started to appear in my Inspector list, of certain dung type. I leave them now and be patient to see if the DWG finally steps in. To me this is reportable.
SekeRob (2022-10-26 16:09:26+00:00): Gone ahead and reported the issue of valid tag removals and leaving the white lines only to the Data Work Group "mapping for rendering", to include incorrect tag usages such as footways as areas. Unacceptable to me.

cheers
CurlingMan13 (2023-07-06 00:32:02+00:00): They are all tagless again.  It's an absolute mess.
SekeRob (2023-07-06 08:19:31+00:00): virtual= yes is to be used with proper way tagging BUT, recently discovered an actual documented way of mapping 'virtual' routes across areas which all but 1 I know can not plan routes across omnidirectional areas. The tag is highway=footway+footway=link

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Tag:footway%3Dlink

Nearly 12,000 uses so far.

I've been replacing the virtual=yes tags whenever I encounter one I set myself for both footways and cycleways i.e. cycleway=link when there's no formal laid out way across areas causing navigator to report 'cannnot compute route" all plan routes along streets confusing the heck out of users.

Combinable with sidewalks and steps as well. Then you can use your  navigator to get from A to B at Disneyland (if they not already have their own get-around app.)

Think here a little mechanics in JOSM to fix the lot i.e. 1) search virtual=yes, then a search remove of those with a highway=* key

Gone on long enough.
SomeoneElse (2023-07-07 18:46:33+00:00): For info, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7272 .
Gazer75 (2023-08-12 17:19:55+00:00): Please don't duplicate charging stations. The node is for a group of chargers, not individual dispensers. I've removed the duplicates leaving one as it should be.
Noen (2023-08-12 18:52:42+00:00): This changeset does as the changeset comment suggest, and only touch the «mapillary» tag. Gazer75's message should be directed to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116591570
Gazer75 (2023-08-12 19:01:19+00:00): Of course, my bad... I find it hard to figure out who made the actual error.
LASHx3 (2022-10-20 01:17:44+00:00): I meant Moonbeam Rd lol
sansell (2023-02-06 05:04:26+00:00): This does not appear to be a currently existing railway. Where can information on its history be found? It should not appear on the map if it is not present.
Glassman (2022-10-21 22:39:38+00:00): #TIP: Square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127814763
Glassman (2022-10-22 23:08:24+00:00): Some of the building outlines seem to be over empty land. Can you confirm that a structure exists?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127814848
Diacritic (2022-10-26 04:44:43+00:00): Hi Volga,

The way you have modelled this intersection is unfortunately incorrect.

Turn lanes that are not physically separated should not be represented by a different way. Instead, the turn: and change: keys can be used to indicate where a turn lane exists. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway

We use a "box" as an abstract representation of the intersection for easier routing. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Junctions#Dual_carriageway_intersections

I've reverted this change, but I'm happy to answer any further questions you might have.

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127815151
jtracey (2022-10-21 17:24:04+00:00): Just to be clear: private houses are very much encouraged, it's just that it takes a lot of time and work to add all those buildings. If you don't want to draw extra attention to these buildings that's of course fine though. I and some other editors have been slowly working our way out from Downtown Kitchener, but if you'd like I can jump here and start adding things along Main and Concession? (Or you are of course welcome to start adding them yourself! :))
BMaloney (2022-10-23 00:25:21+00:00): I do appreciate the clarification for a new user - I have some free time and too much interest in detail so I will certainly give it a try...
Friendly_Ghost (2022-10-20 13:39:29+00:00): I reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127839991 because the Ukrainian OSM community urges us not to edit the map of Ukraine during the war there (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war).
Glassman (2022-10-22 23:32:38+00:00): These features seem make believe. Only features that can be verified should be added to OSM. Please let me know if these are real objects.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127815369
Glassman (2022-10-22 23:32:52+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127815369
Glassman (2022-10-25 20:59:40+00:00): I didn't hear back from you so I reverted your edit. Please let me know if you think this is wrong.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127815369
ovruni (2022-10-20 04:48:05+00:00): Hola Yhina, en este conjunto de cambios se han desplazado un monton de objetos, se han eliminado objetos existentes sin motivo aparente y se han copiado y pegado varios edificios, por otra parte el texto "un mapa mas especifico "tampoco brinda detalles sobre los cambios realizados, por lo que he revertido el conjunto de cambios. Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe 
Saludos
Glassman (2022-10-22 23:37:42+00:00): You removed the underground cable across lake washington. Was that in error?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127817118
compdude (2022-12-05 04:35:37+00:00): Not sure if a road that closes in winter should necessarily be a trunk road. Was this agreed upon by other users in Colorado?

I don't see it listed here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Colorado/Highway_Classification#Trunk_Roads
Allison P (2022-10-20 04:52:14+00:00): You have not responded to my previous changeset comments, which can result in being temporarily blocked from editing. Please use better changeset comments.
Adhil@123 (2022-10-21 11:24:04+00:00): please dont intersect land use area with road or stream ...pls make it independent one
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127817552
Adhil@123 (2022-10-21 11:28:00+00:00): pls remove interscetions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127817585
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Adhil@123 (2022-10-21 11:29:30+00:00): please remove intersection with stream and make stream independent one
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127817645
nyampire (2022-10-21 03:38:23+00:00): こんにちは。OSMの積極的な編集、ありがとうございます。
ただ、残念ながら、sourceとして提示いただいている情報「大口町認定路線網図」はOSMでの利用許諾を得られていない情報のようです。

こちら、大口町から利用に関する特別許可などを得ていたりしますか？
もし得られていない場合、いったん編集をストップしていただき、いくつかこちらでチェックなどする時間をいただけるでしょうか。

もし大口町からの許諾が得られない場合、たいへん残念ながら、編集を巻き戻しさせていただく可能性もありますこと、ご了承ください。
また、お返事をいただけない場合も、同様に巻き戻しの処理を行いたいと思っています。

お手数ですみません、自由な地図の維持のため、ご協力のほど何卒よろしくお願いいたします。
nyampire (2022-10-23 23:02:21+00:00): こちら、別途メッセージをいただきまして、対応中です。
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 14:12:36+00:00): your mapping is good
 please keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127818529
Glassman (2022-10-22 23:46:12+00:00): It looks like you added a second landuse polygon inside of an existing landuse polygon.  Since a new Amazon facility is being built there I removed your landuse polygon.

#TIP: Other background imagery may be more current than Bing. For example Esri World Imagery shows the construction of the Amazon warehouse.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127818812
ppnplus (2023-07-28 02:37:22+00:00): การแก้ไขของท่านได้ถูกย้อนกลับแล้ว เนื่องจากพบว่าอาจเป็นการแก้ไขสแปม หากต้องการแค่หาเส้นทางไปสถานที่ที่ต้องการไป กรุณาใช้ปุ่มหาเส้นทาง (ข้างปุ่ม "ไป") และสามารถศึกษาวิธีการใช้งานได้จากทั้งบทฝึกสอนในตัวแก้ไข และ OpenStreetMap Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Th:Main_Page) ครับ

หากมีคำถามหรือข้อสงสัยเพิ่มเติม สามารถสอบถามได้ตลอดนะครับ

- อาสาสมัครดูแลแผนที่

Your edit has been reverted because it may be a spam edit. If you'd like to only find directions, please use the Directions button (next to the "Go" button). For details on how to use and edit, you can use the editor's tutorial and OpenStreetMap Wiki.

If you have any questions regarding how to use OpenStreetMap, feel free to ask me.

- Volunteer mapper
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:14:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
silversurfer83 (2022-10-20 08:54:59+00:00): Hello and thank you for your contribution.

PLEASE don't change things over severeal continents in one upload.

cheers
mk2k22 (2022-10-22 09:29:45+00:00): Also, please don't create duplicates without checking if a POI already existed there before!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-22 09:11:10+00:00): Witam!

I zachęcam do opisywania zmian edycji - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Sam Wilson (2022-10-31 08:13:18+00:00): Hi Alistair,

It looks like lots of these ruined barracks are not actually extant on the ground, and so should not be mapped. Some of them are I think, such as the three to the east of the Homestead, but the others have zero trace on the ground and so are not verifiable.

Thanks,
Sam.
rab (2022-10-21 20:02:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075087653

hi,
there is no road visible in the imagery
SmokeCreekDesert (2022-10-22 17:59:48+00:00): Hello rab, I have adjusted the road here to better match Maxar Premium Imagery. Thank you!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:47:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 14:11:29+00:00): The mapping is good
please keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127820298
impiaaa (2022-10-20 15:09:58+00:00): Using "highway=living_street" anywhere in the US is questionable. Using it in an area completely closed off to public motor traffic is certainly wrong. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=living_street A single building should have one way with a building=* tag along the outside. If different parts of the building are different heights, those should be tagged as building:part=*, not extra buildings themselves. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
Piskvor (2022-10-20 11:49:24+00:00): No need to specify "road that's open for public is also open for bikes", this is the normal situation, and only needs to be mapped where it's different from the normal. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Sam Wilson (2023-03-08 11:59:22+00:00): Hi,

The path you've got running from Digby Drive south and between the lakes is not there, there's nothing on the ground but thick trees and no sign of a track (at least at the northern end, along the cliff-top).

Is this another 1940s track that is now completely grown over?

I'm going to delete it, if you don't mind.

Thanks,
Sam.
Sam Wilson (2023-03-08 12:00:10+00:00): To clarify, this is what it looks like: https://westnordost.de/p/135725.jpg
UKChris (2022-10-23 10:41:12+00:00): Hi AleksaJav,

Regarding Way (1105429840) Bridgwater Road, did you delete the old way and create a new one?

I only ask as the new one is marked as 40mph, but I thought I had updated the road to 30mph some time ago.

As the old road seems to have been deleted, I am unable to check this, are you able to check this via your JOSM history?
aleksaJov (2022-10-24 08:03:31+00:00): Hi  UKChris,

The road segment was splitted and new ways and id-s was set at Compass Avenue intersection location. The origin way id which is splitted is 700361320.
https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/700361320 

Regards,
Aleksandar
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-18 03:36:04+00:00): Reviewed
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127822021
Shandhivya (2024-02-14 08:34:29+00:00): Sorry, it was a mistake,  I was in the learning process then.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-02-14 12:54:58+00:00): I appreciate your effort in improving OSM, Shandhivya, and fully understand that it was an innocent, unintended mistake. Please continue to improve OSM as your interest guides you.
Glassman (2022-10-23 00:02:04+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127822108
uknown-gryphus (2022-12-10 04:14:07+00:00): Hi, thank you for your edits. There are no "guided busways" on ORR, the bus lanes would be best marked as busway:left=lane. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:busway
Pooja Koul (2022-12-26 04:00:22+00:00): Hi,
Can u please mention the node here as i am not sure whether this is marked by me or not.....Thanks
uknown-gryphus (2022-12-26 04:05:08+00:00): Hi, sorry I should've mentioned it in the initial comment: I'm referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105437334
Pooja Koul (2022-12-26 04:33:40+00:00): Hi,
I have changed the feature type. Just check it once.
uknown-gryphus (2022-12-26 04:38:53+00:00): Hi, I think since its just a bus lane on the left, it should just be busway:left=lane on the main highway=trunk for ORR. However I think BMRCL has dismantled the bus lane to construct the blue line, so it probably should be removed until the bus lanes are rebuilt.
Pooja Koul (2022-12-26 04:53:32+00:00): I think it makes sense have deleted the feature for now
jpcqvb (2022-11-28 18:04:42+00:00): Bonjour,

La nouvelle caserne des pompiers n'est pas encore en service. Cependant elle apparait comme telle sur la carte, ce qui peut induire en erreur.

Pour un bâtiment lié à la sécurité c'est gênant.

J'ai donc noté "future:" l'amenity. Elle devrait ouvrir en mai ou juin et à ce moment il suffira de supprimer le préfixe "future:" (source : les pompiers qui distribuent leur calendrier)
A-d-r-i (2022-11-28 18:20:04+00:00): Bonjour,

En effet merci pour l'attention ! 😊

Je n'avais pas pensé à "future:amenity", mais à ajouter  "construction=fire_station" (en association avec amenity=construction) ce qui n'existe pas (encore). Vous avez résolu le problème !
Glassman (2022-10-23 00:08:21+00:00): #TIP: opening hours are entered as Mo-Fr 08:00-17:00. Can you fix your opening hours you entered on this and the other business you added? Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127822505
Glassman (2022-10-23 00:03:58+00:00): It looks like the address node was dragged. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127822643
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-22 13:32:21+00:00): Hi, just a test edit?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
user_5359 (2022-10-20 14:17:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't use your private keys! We have a well defined set of keys for your information.
osmviborg (2022-10-20 08:22:24+00:00): Skal være en brugeroplysning, så er det 'description' du skal bruge.
map per (2022-10-24 19:07:31+00:00): Concerning review_requested:

everything looks good, thanks for your edit
Discostu36 (2022-12-08 08:13:47+00:00): Relation 14713852 ist ein invalides Multipolygon. Ich bin nicht ganz sicher, was du versucht hast, da zu machen. Zwei Straßennamen ergibt ja irgendwie auch keinen Sinn.