piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
archpdx (2021-08-03 23:19:02+00:00): Hi,
Thanks again for improving the map in Sherwood and Tualatin! It's nice to see new mappers in this region.

In the future, make sure to remove building tags from areas similar to Funtime RV, BrightView Landscape, and Diamond Auto Sales. Presets on the editor you're using add this automatically as it's assuming you're mapping the building itself and not the land around it. You can do this by scrolling down to 'Tags' which is under all the 'Fields'. 

You could also do what I did in (osm.org/changeset/109116475), which is adding the details to the building itself by changing the feature of them and creating landuse areas.
eggie (2021-08-03 14:37:13+00:00): Goed om zaken actueel te maken.. 
Tip: Graag bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnodes.
In OSM dus niet zelf adressen aanmalen. 
gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-03 14:40:39+00:00): Info heb ik even samengevoegd. 
Straatnaam aangepast conform OSM format.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-03 14:41:50+00:00): Rijstebrij in het begin. 
De tagging is 
amenity=fast_food
fast_food=cafetaria

cafe is meer Starbucks
eggie
AndriesWijma (2021-08-03 21:49:35+00:00): De wijzigingen in de omschrijving zijn per abuis toegevoegd aan een eerdere wijzigingenset met deze omschrijving: "Praktijk voor beeldende therapie De Werkplaats te Kollum toegevoegd plus aangelegde toegangsweg met parkeerruimte".
clairedelune (2022-01-17 11:35:28+00:00): Hello, this changeset duplicated some Embassies data that were already existing in OSM database with some differences in location. Would it be possible to confirm if these positions have been crosschecked on the ground in 2021 to improve the already existing data, or could you please clarify the source? Thank you.
UNmapper_mamati (2022-01-17 14:41:15+00:00): Thank you for the comment. The Embassies have been added some month ago by considering a list of coordinates sent by an UN Mission. Tomorrow I will check again the 9 POIs sent by you.
clairedelune (2022-01-17 20:10:15+00:00): Thanks for the reactivity. FYI in total, I counted 47 embassies that you edited in Kinshasa through 11 changesets: 109149996 (1), 109147884 (1), 109097819 (5), 109096226 (9), 109094456 (3), 109085141 (2), 109084238 (11), 109080345 (1), 109080184 (6), 109078260 (4) and 109075938 (4).
I am planning to groundcheck the accuracy of a few points this week.
eggie (2021-08-03 14:34:07+00:00): Best lastig in het begin hoe te mappen.
De speeltuin is hier al als vlak aangegegeven Je kunt dan extra info toevoegen aan het vla. De node kan gewoon weg. Dat is dubbel.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-03 14:35:48+00:00): Typo vla>vlak
Andrea Musuruane (2021-08-03 16:05:33+00:00): Ciao. La modifica fatta non è corretta. Non c'è alcun edificio che occupa tutta quella superficie. Sul nome ho qualche dubbio. Wikipedia use Castello Rubino: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castello_Rubino Quantomeno andrebbero usati entrambi: uno in name e l'altro in old_name oppure uno in name e l'altro in alt_name. Inoltre, i numeri civici, in Italia, sono associati agli ingressi. Bisogna quindi posizionare un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso ove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2021-08-03 15:56:20+00:00): Ciao. Questa edicola votiva non è più presente? https://goo.gl/maps/sQQUPj5foDhrCMUY6 Ciao, Andrea
tastrax (2021-08-11 06:49:31+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
eggie (2021-08-03 14:26:22+00:00): Tip.. Je kunt wellicht PDOK actueel als achtergrond gebruiken in GoMap?
BING is verouderd en ligt verschoven.

MVG
eggie
literan (2021-08-03 16:10:44+00:00): Добрый день. Это не название, а тип объекта. Нужно подойти и посмотреть, что написано на табличке.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-08-03 15:59:30+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. La classificazione della strada è errata. Per approfondire la classificazione su OSM puoi leggere: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway#Highway_.28strade_e_vie.29 Inoltre, non usare le immagini aeree di Bing perché non sono ben allineate nelle nostre zone. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Per cambiare sfondo con iD, prova a guardare questo screenshot: https://imgur.com/1wjkVbr Oppure, se vuoi usare le Bing, le devi riallinearle manualmente usando la funzione "Offset delle immagini" in iD: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#iD Ciao, Andrea
timmito (2021-08-03 16:03:43+00:00): Hallo SRmarketing, bitte gemischte Groß- und Kleinschreibung mit Großschreibung für den ersten Buchstaben eines Wortes verwenden. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
jcr83 (2021-08-09 12:32:32+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez ajouté des attributs VTT sur un chemin piéton, il y a là une contradiction. Si le chemin est pratiquable à vélo, il faudrait le modifier (highway=path au lieu de highway=footway).
Eebie (2021-08-03 20:19:22+00:00): Het stuk Fietssnelweg 791 tussen Oude Blaarstraat en Tongeren-Station hoort volgens de vermelde bron https://fietssnelwegen.be/f791 niet bij die Fietssnelweg en er is ook geen vermelding dat dit gepland is. Nu lijkt dit op een fietskaart als Waymarked Trails een reeds bestaand fietspad.
DD1GJ (2021-08-03 14:11:11+00:00): This was a separate entrance and exit to an underground garage, which is very common in Germany. Please stop making blanket corrections to such supposed errors without local knowledge! I will revert this change tonight. #fail
KVI0n (2021-08-05 11:18:52+00:00): Hi
I don't see parking and its entrances on pictures, so that's why I connected roads this way. Correct me, if I wrong. Thanks!
KVI0n (2021-08-05 11:44:45+00:00): Hi!
I don't see parking and its entrances on pictures, so that's why I connected roads this way. Correct me, if I wrong. Thanks!
KVI0n (2021-09-20 08:56:28+00:00): Hi! 
I canceled my edit. Can I enter the tags amenity parking and underground if this is the entrance/exit to the underground parking? Can you tell me which source you used?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=109097487#map=20/50.36613/8.62547
fukejs (2021-09-07 11:16:18+00:00): Hello. Why did you deleted the node for mountain range Cordillera de la Costa https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5653713128/history ? Was it on wrong place? It is no problem to have mountain range as node if cannot make exact polygon. I'd like to put it back.
Wilmer Osario (2021-09-07 21:34:48+00:00): The problem is that the "Cordillera de la Costa" is 370 kilometers long, from the north of Higuerote ( https://osm.org/go/YlWqOEJ--?m= ), to city of Nirgua ( https://osm.org/go/YP4fqF1-?m= ). Also includes a section south of Cumaná ( https://osm.org/go/Ylw36i?m= ).

https://i.imgur.com/vwaQLiw.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/vdxLZgk.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/jYCwreD.jpg

Officially it is divided into three main sections: "Occidental" (west), "Central" (central) and "Oriental" (east).

I suggest dividing it into three sections called "Cordillera de la Costa Central" ".....Occidental" and "....Oriental", drawing a line, and adding the same Wikidata tag on all of them.
fukejs (2021-09-09 06:51:37+00:00): > adding the same Wikidata tag on all of them

Wikidata should only be inserted for an entity that exactly matches. I don't think it is good idea put the same wikidata id to 3 parts of mountain range. There would have to be partial records on the wikidata for each of the three parts.

The best solution would be to have multipolygon for the whole mountain_range and other polygons (ways or relations) for the parts with different wikidata. But if we are not able to make the polygon precise engouh (we don't know boundaries od geomorphological units) it is better to have a node in the data than not to have an entity at all. I am convinced that this is so - people from whole world can find the approximate location of it at least.
Wilmer Osario (2021-09-09 14:55:09+00:00): All right 👍
eggie (2021-08-03 14:22:57+00:00): Dag BE...  In het begin kijken we maar een beetje mee. Uiteraard om te helpen. 
De beide gebieden zijn al voorzien.
De nodes haal ik even weg.  van de tag highway=services
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservices
Tip..

Beperk het gebied van je edits svp. Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus kan schade veroorzaken door onbedoelde verschuivingen.
Nog een tip.. gebouwen zijn allemaal import vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)  Voor nieuwe gebouwen kun je een verzoek indienen op het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. Staan schuurtjes er bv niet in dan kun je uiteraard zelf iets intekeken.. Zet dan niet de BAG gegevens van andere gebouwen erop.

MVG
eggie
DD1GJ (2021-08-03 14:16:11+00:00): You deleted an emergency access for the fire department across the parking lot. Please stop making blanket corrections to such supposed errors without local knowledge! I will revert this change tonight. #fail
KVI0n (2021-08-05 11:08:19+00:00): Hi!
There were no tags with access or something that shows that it's an emergency road. Correct please, if i was wrong. Thanks!
Glassman (2021-08-04 18:31:44+00:00): #TIP: Using an area (polygon) would better show the size of the apartment complex. Can you update or do you need help?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109098508
timmito (2021-08-03 16:00:42+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Ist da ein Spielplatz vorhanden oder nicht? Bei OSM gilt das Prinzip Map what's on the ground. Wenn ein Spielplatz vorhanden ist, dann sollte dieser auch eingetragen sein. Mit dem Attribut access=private war bereits gekennzeichnet, dass es sich um Privatgelände handelt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806173421/history
Tanja Oberwallner (2021-08-05 12:40:13+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Hinweis. Direkt am Gebäude gibt es ein Freigelände mit Spielgeräten, da es sich um ein Familienzentrum mit Kita handelt. Wenn das per Definition ein Spielplatz (privat) ist, das wäre er direkt an das Gebäude zu zeichnen.
ivanbranco (2021-08-14 08:49:24+00:00): Hi Megha, 

there's a problem with this landuses.

You tagget them as:

1. landuse=residential=residential=irregular residences
2. name=KUnjiparambu

while it should be

1. landuse=residential	
2. residential=irregular_settlement
3. name=Kunjiparambu

can you fix it? Here you can find an Overpass query to make it easier: 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22landuse%3Dresidential%22%3D*+global&R
SGorskiy (2021-08-04 04:43:33+00:00): Привет. Название городов и областей не надо ставить на здания.
Они автоматически наследуются от покрываемых их границ города и области. 
Эта лишняя информация.
Спасибо за понимание!
Jacpp (2021-08-03 15:09:56+00:00): In KW 30 2021 dort gewesen.
Permanente Ruhezone für Wildtiere
wkdgs (2021-08-04 10:50:15+00:00): Hallo ,

ich schreibe dir, weil du angegeben hast, dass jemand deine Änderung überprüfen soll.

Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass der Weg physisch noch existiert. Dann sollte er nicht gelöscht werden. Zum Einen soll die Karte beschreiben, was an dieser Stelle existiert und der Weg ist ja immer noch da. Zum Anderen kann es gut sein, dass der Weg irgendwann wieder freigegeben wird und dann neu gezeichnet werden müsste.

Für Durchgangsverbote gibt es die access-Tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Hier wäre dann wahrscheinlich ein access=no oder access=forestry sinnvoll.

Vorstellbar wäre auch der disused-Präfix: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:

LG
winkeldings
Jacpp (2021-08-04 11:27:38+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank für die Antwort.
Da es meine erste Änderung ist, habe ich es für sinnvoll geachtet, dass sie geprüft wird.

Wie du richtig vermutest, ist der Weg physisch vorhanden aber darf nicht genutzt werden.

Ich denke am sinnvollsten ist es an der Stelle der beiden Schilder ein access=no Tag einzufügen.

Ich werde versuchen die beiden Tags einzufügen.

Gruß
Jacpp
Jacpp (2021-08-04 11:36:12+00:00): siehe Änderungssatz 109142441
Felis Pimeja (2021-11-22 18:47:55+00:00): Привет.
откуда информация о Зареченском сельском поселении? - Не вижу его упоминаний в  [ Законе Томской области от 10 сентября 2004 года № 204-ОЗ О наделении статусом муниципального района, сельского поселения и установлении границ муниципальных образований на территории Первомайского района](https://docs.cntd.ru/document/951809846)
ma-rt-in (2021-10-31 16:36:54+00:00): Hallo,

ist die Rettungswache nicht hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5719860843 ?
eggie (2021-08-03 15:35:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-08-03 15:39:07+00:00): Tip: Eén prullenbak zat vastgeplakt aan het fietspad. Ik heb het nu aan de linkerkant gezet, maar wellciht hoort deze recht. Je zou dus nog even kunnen kijken.
MVG
eggie
Zaffo80 (2021-08-04 17:23:17+00:00): Tutto bene a quel che vedo
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109101285
mueschel (2021-08-08 14:02:54+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong here. You added many roads on top of already existing ones. Please have a look and clean this up.
ratrun (2021-08-11 14:55:18+00:00): The same is true for changeset 109101492. I think both changesets should be reverted. I tried it using the JSOM reverter plugin, but there are already a couple of conflicts.
mueschel (2021-08-11 15:37:30+00:00): Yes, this was essentially one upload, but it got split because it exceeded 10000 objects.
A full revert seems difficult and also not necessary I think. There are plenty additions that are ok. 
I'll remove the major part of overlapping roads, and then we have to  manually check the remaining errors like unconnected ways.
mueschel (2021-08-11 16:15:18+00:00): I think the most problematic things are fixed now, but still some work with the validator to fix unconnected / overlapping ways is necessary.
lyctkel (2022-05-30 16:29:53+00:00): Hi intgr,
the tags recycling:deposit_bottles and recycling:deposit_cans at way 700727545 are not often used. 
Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:vending%3Dbottle_return was meant.
Regards,
lyctkel
wkdgs (2021-08-04 11:06:13+00:00): Existiert der Weg noch? Dann sollte er nicht gelöscht werden. 

Für Wege, die ein Durchgangs- oder Durchfahrverbot gibt, gibt es die access-Tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
wkdgs (2021-08-04 13:26:09+00:00): Mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass du geschrieben hast, dass der Weg weggeschwemmt wurde. Dann kannst du meinen Kommentar ignorieren und der demolished-Tag wäre passend:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:demolished:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109102225
Zaffo80 (2021-08-04 17:25:25+00:00): Se il nome è corretto, il resto è ok
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109102310
Silvia81 (2021-08-04 17:42:19+00:00): Perché non riesco a vedere il
Monumento ai Caduti che ho caricato? Grazie mille
user_5359 (2021-08-03 16:07:29+00:00): I miss the change set number: 109093499
CjMalone (2021-08-06 21:07:57+00:00): Thanks for this. Just some FYI below, see #109284505.

I'd also remove the brand tags.

atm=yes is unlikely, if an outside ATM did survive it should be on an node with amenity=atm but I think banks usually remove them when the branch closes.

contact:website also becomes irrelevant so can be removed.

name can be a controversial one.
Some people think it should perfectly match the fascia, so a name can stay when something closes but the sign stays.
Some people think it should go to old_name since the establishment no longer operates there.
Some people just remove it as historical data doesn't really belong within OSM.

I don't have a strong opinion, I'm moving it to old_name in this case. Banks usually remove there signage when they close, and historical data can sometimes be useful.

Thanks for the help.
sirdabalot (2021-08-07 10:14:46+00:00): And you've already done the work for me, cheers! I'll bear this in mind in future :)

I can confirm the ATM is gone, and they've also removed the signage.

Thanks again!
BCNorwich (2021-08-03 16:08:14+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You somehow uploaded 13 nodes onto the exact same position, some tagged as traffic lights, some untagged. I've removed them all for you as I would think the uploads were inadvertent.

Please be careful not to upload fiction or tests to OSM as OSM is a live worldwide database from which maps are constantly being compiled.

Please refrain from uploading again till you know what you're doing. If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-08-03 16:10:59+00:00): Please stop uploading until you know what you're doing, you're likely to corrupt the database.

Regards Bernard.
Sahilg1610 (2021-08-03 16:25:17+00:00): Hi Bernard, sorry about this. I was exploring the API and yeah used the prod URL. Will not repeat this again.
BCNorwich (2021-08-03 17:28:34+00:00): Hi, No harm done, glad to help if you need it.

Regards Bernard.
francians (2021-08-04 04:35:57+00:00): Ciao,

Grazie per i contributi, ho revisionato alcuni changeset e suggerisco di non usare multipoligoni tranne che per case con cortile interno. Se possibile usa dei commenti dei changeset un po' più utili, come: sistemato geometrie.

Grazie mille
Francesco
tuxayo (2021-08-03 16:08:01+00:00): autre source: survey
GinaroZ (2021-09-27 18:37:11+00:00): I've changed these to asphalt as I'm assuming they were not meant to be tagged as unpaved! :)
FrenchyF (2021-09-28 09:24:38+00:00): Yes, thanks!
Mashin (2021-08-03 18:32:22+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for contributing! 
Just a small thing, we don't put hiking trail blaze color as a name tag for the path. All that information is in relations. e.g. this is the purple trail https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11785086

Also, which of the paths were marked as private?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109104311
Irwin Schwab (2021-08-11 03:39:40+00:00): Thanks for explaining a Relation. Now I know.
Irwin Schwab (2021-08-11 03:50:20+00:00): The Track becomes private as it crosses the boundaries of the state forest (to the west) and open space (to the east), when it enters the property of "12 Deerfield Lane". The owner of the property has posted No Trespassing signs on the track/old dirt road, just before the boundary. They are clearly visible as one travels north on the Track.
Mashin (2021-08-11 04:06:45+00:00): Got it! Good work!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-28 21:57:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855934621/history has shop = home_goods that was added in this edit
shop=home_goods ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=houseware ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?
BCNorwich (2021-08-09 11:44:58+00:00): Hi, I unjoined the golf area from the railway line.
mariotomo (2021-08-03 21:29:55+00:00): jeśli masz czas i chęć, możesz dodać więcej. szczególnie ważne są te wzdłuż rzek. ;-)
mariotomo (2021-08-03 21:44:34+00:00): proszę używaj maxara, zapomnij o bingu.
Владимир К (2022-06-06 12:06:56+00:00): Добрый день!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970151437

traffic_calming=rumble_strip должен быть на точках, принадлежащих дороге, или на линии самой дороги. но не отдельной линией поверх дороги.
SafetyIng (2021-08-07 07:54:40+00:00): Hey, für Rettungswachen gibt es den Key: emergency=ambulance_station
Allgemein sollte in name=* keine beschreibenden Namen hinein....
francians (2021-08-03 17:50:36+00:00): Ciao,

Grazie per il contributo, se si tratta di un pilone o edicola votiva, consiglio di usare:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=wayside_shrine

Francesco
yelisey90 (2025-07-23 19:08:09+00:00): rv for way(id:51067848), already reverted for way(id:51067846)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/169362469
Binnette (2022-07-20 05:26:11+00:00): Salut VoilàVoilà, les amenity=parking_space sont à utiliser pour 1 place de parking unique. J'ai donc remplacé une série de parking_space que tu avais créé par des amenity=parking
VoilàVoilà (2022-07-22 12:24:38+00:00): Salut Binnette. En effet, je pensais que le champ "capacity" servait à indiquer le nombre de places. Par-contre, il faudrait que je dessine chaque place séparément parce qu'avec un amenity=parking, ça alourdi visuellement la carte "utilisateur' (l'ajout des icones "P" de partout n'est peut-être pas très recommandé). A mon sens, dans la vraie vie ce type d'icone "P" est plutôt associé à un ensemble de places de parking (ce genre de traitement me parait approprié : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164408278).
En tout cas, avec tes modifs, on est correct dans l'utilisation des balises. Merci pour l'info.
DressyPear4 (2021-10-09 16:56:39+00:00): Olá, procure revisar os dados antes de fazer uma importação, aqui por exemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970156576/history
não existe mata.
Essa aqui 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970156357
ficou sobrepondo essa 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/743761854/history
sem contar que há vários nós soltos sem informação como esse
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7007155967/history
paas-nat (2021-10-11 16:51:03+00:00): Olá Dressy. Agradeço a atenção. 

Estou tentando reverter as importações realizadas para poder tratar melhor os dados, mas estou com dificuldades na hora de baixar o plugin "reverter" no JOSM. Ele informa uma mensagem de erro e não instala. Agradeceria se você pudesse me informar um outro método de reverter edições.
DressyPear4 (2021-10-11 18:21:32+00:00): Talvez é algo que poderia ser ajustado aos poucos, mas se quiser reverter tem esse site
http://level0.osmz.ru/
paas-nat (2021-10-11 20:52:12+00:00): Vou ver como o site funciona e tentar reverter as importações. Continuo com os dados salvos no computador e assim que possível faço uma revisão nos dados para pensar numa re-importação.
PT-53 (2021-08-04 06:44:48+00:00): Hallo NUP,
diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970157622/history
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Grüße
NUP (2021-08-04 07:09:18+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
das hatte ich übersehen und habe ich nun entfernt. Danke für den Hinweis.
Gruß NUP
eggie (2021-08-04 06:00:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
marc__marc (2026-01-13 22:26:34+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151646966/history/4
you changed a forest into farmland.
can you review it ? if it's a farmland, it's not genus Quercus anymore ?
Regards,
Marc
Sandal man (2026-01-14 07:35:20+00:00): Can't remember I did the edit, but you are right, I make a mistake.
marc__marc (2026-01-15 11:03:44+00:00): thanks for the feedback
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-07 15:48:13+00:00): Just fyi, there seem to be three comm masts here, see also Bing:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8977833575
katpatuka (2021-08-07 17:51:45+00:00): On Bing I'm spotting 2 from their shadows, so I've added one more.
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-07 19:53:01+00:00): Ok. Checked and I think the third is natural I'm misjudging after all. I've completed the track and aligned them to maxar.
yzemaze (2021-08-03 18:54:21+00:00): bridge=movable bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60578864
Lokalfuerst (2021-10-02 13:48:39+00:00): was meinst du genau bitte?
yzemaze (2021-10-02 22:02:39+00:00): erledigt, s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60578864/history 
Version #13