piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GOwin (2018-08-13 09:16:36+00:00): Hello @jaylawrence23. Kindly include a concise, useful comment in your changeset that describes your edits, instead of just leaving "#pupsjcwts". 

Also, do be precise when tracing features, and remember to square building corners.

http://imgur.com/tboxPijl.png
When tracing roof-tops such as this, do not follow the angle of the roof because the satellite is also taken at an angle, which wouldn't represent the building outline accurately.  Simply trace the straight edges from each corner, without the wavy lines, and offset the building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61595746
GOwin (2018-08-13 09:16:44+00:00): Hello @jaylawrence23. Kindly include a concise, useful comment in your changeset that describes your edits, instead of just leaving "#pupsjcwts". 

Also, do be precise when tracing features, and remember to square building corners.

http://imgur.com/tboxPijl.png
When tracing roof-tops such as this, do not follow the angle of the roof because the satellite is also taken at an angle, which wouldn't represent the building outline accurately.  Simply trace the straight edges from each corner, without the wavy lines, and offset the building.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61595746
GOwin (2018-08-13 09:18:05+00:00): Hello @jaylawrence23. Kindly include a concise, useful comment in your changeset that describes your edits, instead of just leaving "#pupsjcwts". 

Also, do be precise when tracing features, and remember to square building corners.

http://imgur.com/tboxPijl.png
When tracing roof-tops such as this, do not follow the angle of the roof because the satellite is also taken at an angle, which wouldn't represent the building outline accurately.  Simply trace the straight edges from each corner, without the wavy lines, and offset the building.

Please fix these, and your other earlier edits.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61595898
misbach syarief (2018-08-12 18:00:22+00:00): Penempatan Desa Dayah Syarif Salah,
GOwin (2018-08-13 09:19:52+00:00): Kindly fix these, and improve the precision of your building traces.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61595996
GOwin (2018-08-13 09:26:33+00:00): Hello @jaylawrence23. Kindly include a concise, useful comment in your changeset that describes your edits, instead of just leaving "#pupsjcwts". 

Also, do be precise when tracing features, and remember to square building corners.

http://imgur.com/tboxPijl.png
When tracing roof-tops such as this, do not follow the angle of the roof because the satellite is also taken at an angle, which wouldn't represent the building outline accurately.  Simply trace the straight edges from each corner, without the wavy lines, and offset the building.

Please fix these, and your other earlier edits.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61596147
GOwin (2018-08-13 09:31:04+00:00): Hello @jaylawrence23. Kindly include a concise, useful comment in your changeset that describes your edits, instead of just leaving "#pupsjcwts". 

Also, do be precise when tracing features, and remember to square building corners.

http://imgur.com/tboxPijl.png
When tracing roof-tops such as this, do not follow the angle of the roof because the satellite is also taken at an angle, which wouldn't represent the building outline accurately.  Simply trace the straight edges from each corner, without the wavy lines, and offset the building.

Please fix these, and your other earlier edits.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61596178
Almtesh (2018-08-13 06:39:01+00:00): Bonjour, quelle rapport avec les musée en Nouvelle-Aquitaine ?
jfnif (2018-08-13 18:47:28+00:00): A priori aucun... sauf que, à l'occasion de l'ajout des musées en question à partir de la base SIRTAQUI, j'ai très ponctuellement rectifié des profils de voirie. Et les commentaires se sont appliqués partout :(
marc__marc (2024-08-27 15:26:57+00:00): Hello,
can you fix all duplicate/overlapping building ?
https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/issues/open?source=5533&item=0&class=2
Regards,
Marc
Schiller256 (2019-02-20 14:07:02+00:00): Wieso wird denn die relation associatedStreet hier entfernt? Diese enthielt weder Fehler noch sonst irgendetwas war mir ihr falsch?

6825898, v6
gabro00 (2018-08-16 11:41:52+00:00): Az Aradi vértanúk terén láttam, hogy csak az egyik villamosmegálló peron van tömegközlekedési kapcsolatban és kapott public_transport=platform tagelést, a párja nem. A Széchenyi téren pl. mindkettő highway=platform. Bug vagy feature?
csehpacilla (2018-08-20 12:52:29+00:00): Bug. Javítom. JOSM-ben rákerestem a highway=platform kifejezésre, és az eredményt javítottam public_transport=platform-ra. Ennek ellenére most úgy látom, még mindig van 44 vonal "highway" taggel.
csehpacilla (2018-08-20 14:59:08+00:00): Most látom, hogy több olyan megálló is van még, ahol a peron nincs tömegközlekedési kapcsolatba szervezve. Na ezzel nem foglalkoztam.
andrewwiseman (2018-08-15 17:31:24+00:00): Thanks for all your mapping! Don't forget to square the corners of your buildings with the s key on your keyboard, that way they are the correct shape and have 90-degree corners. Thank you!
L'imaginaire (2018-08-13 06:30:01+00:00): sorry, bron zijn niet de AIV luchtfoto's, maar de PDOK luchtfoto's
gabro00 (2018-08-12 22:58:34+00:00): Kb 1 hónapja neveztem át utcákat, ez kavart be?
csehpacilla (2018-08-13 06:02:29+00:00): Á, dehogy :) A járatok nevében volt pontosvessző, és ezt a JOSM többszörös értékadásnak vette. Ezt javítottam vesszőre.
Владимир К (2018-08-13 08:40:43+00:00): Добрый день!
Пожалуйста, оставляйте содержательные комментарии.
0815jh007 (2018-08-12 19:28:33+00:00): beser wäre gewesen: website -> contact:facebook, sorry!
highflyer74 (2018-08-14 12:04:17+00:00): Hallo Heinz06!

Vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Mit der Größe des Gebäudes ist etwas schief gelaufen. Es war viel zu gross. Ich habe es jetzt der realen Größe angepasst, zwei weitere hinzugefügt und den Betrieb (office=forestry) vom Gebäude getrennt als Node (Punkt) im Gebäude untergebracht.

Schau Dir am besten mal folgende Links an, damit Du ein Grundverständnis von der Funktionsweise von OSM bekommst.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Heinz06 (2018-08-14 12:18:54+00:00): Danke für deine Hilfe.
Aber es handelt sich um einen Forstwirt / forstwirtschaftlichen Betrieb (was OSM leider nicht anbietet), nicht um ein Forstamt / eine Forstverwaltung.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office=forestry
Eigentlich wollte ich das Gelände als Betriebs-/Firmengelände kennzeichnen (wenn forstw. Betrieb schon fehlt), aber auch das scheint es bei OSM nicht zu geben.
highflyer74 (2018-08-14 12:34:05+00:00): Hallo und danke für Deine Rückmeldung. Dann können wir das unspezifische office=company nehmen und ein description=* hinzufügen. Ist erledigt :-)
highflyer74 (2018-08-14 12:36:42+00:00): Noch eine Frage: ist das denn ausschliesslich ein kommerzielles Gelände? Oder wohnt man dort auch?
Heinz06 (2018-08-14 13:21:30+00:00): In dem südlichsten der drei eingezeichneten Gebäuden wohnt Derjenige, der nördliche Teil der Grundstücks ist kommerziell - ist aber alles die selbe Hausnummer.
Leo Slager (2018-08-12 23:17:17+00:00): Dat ziet er prima uit.
YraFyra (2018-08-12 21:02:01+00:00): Hej
Ringsbergsvägen är kanske det officiella namnet. Hultavägen används av folk i Breven. Hur ska vi synliggöra det?
Erik Hagelberg (2018-08-13 03:37:10+00:00): Hej! Precis, det är det officiella namnet. Jag misstänkte att det kanske var ett lokalt namn, alternativt ett misstag. Men nu har jag taggat om vägen med alt_name + loc_name = Hultavägen.
YraFyra (2018-08-13 06:10:58+00:00): Toppen!
Mac_01 (2018-08-13 17:59:27+00:00): Hallo MSiebenhaar,

kurze Frage an dich, stehen in Weingarts Straßenschilder an den Straßen mit dem namen "Weingarts" ? 

Für dich zur Info, wenn keine Straßenschilder vorhanden sind, dann bekommen die Straßen in OSM auch keine Namen und anstatt addr:street wird der Ortsname unter addr:place eingetragen. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr

Auszug:
addr:place: "Hier wird der Dorfname eingetragen, wenn es in einem Dorf keine Straßennamen gibt bzw. diese nicht für die Postadresse verwendet werden (also Max Mustermann, Dorfname 14, 12345 Gemeindename)"

P.S. Ich habe Weingarts im Januar 2018 komplett sauber gemacht. Schade wenn dann alles nicht Wiki konform wieder rückgängig gemacht wird.

Viele Grüße und noch viel Spaß bei OSM.

Mac
MSiebenhaar (2018-08-13 20:28:52+00:00): Hallo Mac,

danke für die Hinweise. Mit der Adresse hast du Recht. addr:place kannte ich noch nicht. Ich fand die Verwendung des Ortsnamens als Straßenname aber 'natürlich' weil es ja so auch in der Postanschrift ist. Deshalb hab ich mich auch nicht weiter umgeschaut.
Ich hab die addr:street Tags jetzt umbenannt in addr:place.

Ich hab auch die Straßennamen wieder entfernt. Die hatte ich hauptsächlich eingefügt weil JOSM hier Warnungen gegeben hat. Dafür hab ich jetzt das noname Tag angefügt. Das passt glaub ich besser und es gibt keine Warnungen.

Die Änderungen sind im Datensatz 61637974.

Gruß
MSiebenhaar
Mac_01 (2018-08-13 21:16:10+00:00): Hallo MSiebenhaar,

vielen Dank für die Antwort und die Änderungen.

Viele Grüße

Mac
abakus_uploader (2018-08-12 22:30:55+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
kasmar00 (2018-08-15 19:45:47+00:00): Poprawiłem adres kawiarni (dodałem nazwę ulicy).
Hjart (2018-08-12 20:32:13+00:00): I've moved tags from the outer polygon to the relation.
Supaplex (2019-02-07 06:13:38+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Hjart (2018-08-12 20:18:37+00:00): Er der mulighed for at du kan undgå contact: prefix når du redigerer i DK?
archie (2018-08-13 01:44:47+00:00): Hvorfor kan du ikke lige contact-schemat? Det skaber ju orden. Jeg ska försöge at tänke på det neste gang. Jeg lover!
Hjart (2018-08-13 06:43:06+00:00): Jeg må indrømme at jeg har ganske svært ved at se hvordan contact præfixet reelt ".skaber orden". Der er mange af os der ikke køber den ide og praksis betyder det bare at jeg ved søgninger i data skal søge på både "website" & "contact:website", hvilket helt klart er mere besværligt end bare at søge på "website". Desuden kræver "contact:website" altid at blive sat i gåseøjne for at fungere, mens website ikke gør.
freeExec (2018-08-13 17:30:18+00:00): А чего осм-линия от столба до трансформатора никак не обозначена, провода, кабель, или на одном столбе они?
Pasha Rockof (2018-08-14 18:30:07+00:00): Да. косяк. ...исправил. Спасибо.
BCNorwich (2018-08-13 07:51:58+00:00): Hi, adjacent houses with party walls are best if joined together. Some of the one you've mapped have the party walls with gaps between them of even overlapping. 
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2018-08-22 07:14:21+00:00): OK I've corrected a lot of them for you. But you really ought go back and correct all the errors, the buildings should then be squared up.
Regards Bernard.
◪ Jarv (2018-08-22 11:46:14+00:00): @BCNorwich I normally do, just sometimes when there is the occasional one or two adjacent houses it adds to the amount of effort.
How does one square builds up with each other? Im using the iD editor and it makes it a pain to line buildings up with each other.
BCNorwich (2018-08-22 16:18:02+00:00): Hi, yes it is a bit more effort but I think well worth it to do things right. It's a relatively easy job in JOSM to terrace buildings and square them up. JOSM is superior in many ways and I would encourage folk to give it a try.

In iD editor, the buildings first have to be joined together. Select/highlight one building, drag a corner node onto the corner node of the adjacent building, release it, it should stick/join the two corner nodes together, (test by again dragging the joined node, it should drag the corners of both buildings. Repeat for all corners to be joined. (when a building is highlighted any joined nodes are grey, unjoined nodes are white).
Then each building is squared up.

Regards Bernard
Владимир К (2018-08-13 08:33:00+00:00): У вас адрес неверный. Или вы точку не туда поставили. Академика рубаненко находится в новом городе.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:56:19+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/616390031/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
5R-MFT (2024-02-05 18:22:00+00:00): Updated to handball
user_242798 (2019-02-07 10:59:46+00:00): Please review my Changeset: 66989489.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66989489
In my view: a gap (one segment only)  in bicycle=no/use_sidepath on Oudelandseweg is very unlikely.
Yes, you may argue Woerden is sloppy on traffic_signs (G11, G12a, C15). But there is always one traffic_sign on one side of the highway.
[traffic_sign=NL:C15] on Oudelandseweg is to be found near Fort Oranje, which does imply [bicycle=no] to be correct.
Also [traffic_signs=NL:BW03-xx] implies moped=no and if moped=no then bicycle=yes (not: 'no') is very unlikely. More likely: [bicycle=use_sidepath]. Which is confirmed by at least some (!) G11/G12a.
If it's your opinion some traffic_signs are missing (I agree, f.i. Oudelandseweg-Fort Oranje), than I suggest the create a ticket for Woerden to resolve. But I don't agree on formalizing a 70% correct situation to a 90% incorrect situation.
But also: please acknowledge the fact Woerden will be reluctant to buy and put 'rather needless' traffic_signs 'on the ground'. There is a serious cost to the traffic_signs. I did not count them all, but my guess: at least 10 (!) traffic_signs are missing (two at each highway junction).
Source: Mapillary (my images d.d. 2018-10-10). Which is more recent then your Changeset, suggesting NL:C15 is still 'on the ground'. But I will verify (survey) again.
But even after my disagreement: situation has improved on OSM after yours and mine Changesets. Most specific [traffic_signs=NL:BW03-xx] locations have been corrected. (These locations are also very sloppy 'on the ground': I had to look for several minutes to find the 'bromfietsdoorsteek' in direction south-north).
user_242798 (2019-02-07 11:26:17+00:00): Image:
https://i.postimg.cc/rm2MLPN0/bicycle-no-missing-2019-02-07.png
Leo Slager (2018-08-12 22:01:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2018-08-12 22:02:41+00:00): Je hebt de adresnode met nummer 10 van de kaart verwijderd. Dat is niet de bedoeling. Ik zet de gegevens even terug.
대왕판다 (2018-08-19 11:59:06+00:00): This is Macedonia, not Moldavia!
RicoElectrico (2018-09-23 00:13:26+00:00): Witaj,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5827897594

To chyba miało być highway=street_lamp, prawda?
Wulfmorn (2018-11-17 00:33:28+00:00): Bump^.

highway=stree_ -> highway=street_lamp?
LorenzoStucchi (2018-08-19 14:22:59+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto su OpenStreetMap.
Ti consiglio prima di salvare controlla di aver reso quadrati gli edifici, usando il comando "ortogonalizza" disponibile nel menu a comparsa schiacciando con il tasto destro del mouse. Ciao, buonagiornata
maraf24 (2018-08-13 08:53:18+00:00): A jak jest podstawa tych zmian, biorąc pod uwagę, że nie dodałeś nawierzchni na żadnej z tych dróg, co sugeruje, że ich nie znasz?
Leo Slager (2018-08-12 22:10:29+00:00): Je hebt een prive aantekening op de kaart gezet. Realiseer je dat dat wereldwijd zichtbaar is. Je kunt geen willekeurige lijnen op de kaart zetten. Bovendien zijn meerdere routerelaties beschadigd geraakt.
Deze wijziging wordt teruggedraaid.
Leo Slager (2018-08-12 22:16:50+00:00): Het bewerken van route relaties is werk voor specialisten.
Ik draai deze wijziging terug
Leo Slager (2018-08-12 21:50:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
pitscheplatsch (2018-08-13 15:58:45+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting many buildings, which have been mapped just a few days or weeks ago? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=61600699
MStefy (2018-08-13 16:01:13+00:00): Hi, they were poorly mapped so
pitscheplatsch (2018-08-13 16:09:41+00:00): And now they are missing?
MStefy (2018-08-13 18:11:03+00:00): No, I’ve corrected them.
literan (2018-08-13 19:37:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы вот здесь зря удалили теги зданий с построек https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345628415#map=19/55.78240/37.46637 (и теги школы на каждом из объектов напрасно продублировали). В OSM правило - один объект на местности - один объект в базе. А школа уже отмечена. Поэтому вашу правку придется откатить, она вся некорректная
Leo Slager (2018-08-12 22:31:51+00:00): Het is niet kwaad bedoeld maar source=BAG en de source:date mag je niet zo maar van de kaart verwijderen.
Als je serieus gaat mappen, probeer je dan in te lezen in de materie voor dat je in het wilde weg wijzigingen op de kaart gaat aanbrengen.
19Betty50 (2018-08-13 20:58:04+00:00): sorry
literan (2018-08-13 19:38:37+00:00): и здесь зачем-то туалет продублировали
literan (2018-08-13 19:39:25+00:00): если не знаете - ничего не пишите, не надо писать все подряд в тег name (он только для имен собственных, не для описаний и типов объектов)
literan (2018-08-13 20:01:25+00:00): а это что за фейк? там нет переходов
robert (2018-08-12 22:34:58+00:00): Great start - cut-throughs are really useful things to add to the map. Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
andy_wand (2018-08-12 22:02:25+00:00): Verfügt in Cölledaer Anzeiger 08/2018
Leo Slager (2018-08-13 10:01:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2018-08-13 10:05:58+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk: Je hebt nu ook alle adres gegevens van het pand verwijderd.
Ik ga even kijken of ik dat terug kan zetten.
Leo Slager (2018-08-12 23:06:28+00:00): Prima toevoeging. Persoonlijk zou ik volstaan met 1 keer de website op te nemen.
Matthijs Kooijman (2018-08-13 21:22:27+00:00): Ik wilde even expliciet maken dat de opening hours niet standaard waren en je dus op de website moet kijken daarvoor. Zou er een betere manier zijn om dat aan te geven? Ik las ergens iets van `opening_hours = unknown || Kijk op de website` oid, maar dan is `opening_hours:url`  waarschijnlijk beter parse-baar?
Leo Slager (2018-08-14 08:30:04+00:00): Iemand die iets meer wil weten gat sowieso naar de web-site. Een dubbele vermelding is nmm dan overbodig.
Ik zou daar ook nog rondvaarten kunnen toevoegen en dan voor de derde keer de website opnemen. En in de database theorie neem je iets maar 1 keer op in de database. Maar van mij mag je het rustig laten staan. Het is tenslotte niet echt fout. :-)
j numminen (2018-08-13 05:54:22+00:00): Hi,
did you really mean to upload this? The node looks like a personal note. It has no tags to describe what it is supposed to be. The tag "gpxicon=Flag, Blue" is not documented in the wiki.  Writing a short description of your changes for each changeset would also help clarify the purpose of this change.
Thanks!

J. Numminen
drlvk (2018-08-13 19:02:38+00:00): Sorry, mistake. Will delete.
Lars
hoserab (2018-08-13 16:38:45+00:00): Hi Svetlana, I just wanted to let you know I have deleted the node you added (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61632345) because there was already one there (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5607957700). Cheers
El-lizi Guesthouse (2018-08-13 17:41:56+00:00): გამარჯობა,
ცვლილება რუკაზე  googl ით შესწორდა?? ვერ გავაკეთე ისე,რომ ყველა რუკაზე ერთნაირად და სწორად აჩვენოს,თან აქ სპუტნიკით არ ჩანს,პირდაპირ სახლზე რომ დავსვა მარკერი.
რა ინფორმაცია მოგაწოდოტ ზუსტად რომ აისახოს ობიექტი
მადლობა
El-lizi Guesthouse (2018-08-13 17:51:24+00:00): აქ სწორად არის meps.Me ზე როდის აისახება,და ის მეორე ობიექტი როგორ გავაუქმო,რომელსაც ბუკინგიდან აქვს ინფორმაცია??ვიზუალურად ბუკინგზე სწორად არი გადმოტანილი არასწორად აჩვენებს
როგორ შევასწორო??
A-U-X (2018-08-14 22:03:25+00:00): გამარჯობა, 
ბუკინგიდან მიღებულ ინფორმაციას maps.me ში ვერ გააუქმებთ და ვერც შეცვლით, ავტომატურად გადმოაქვს.
openstreetmap ზე შეცვლილი ინფორმაცია   maps.me ში აისახება 1 ოქტომბრის განახლებით.
El-lizi Guesthouse (2018-08-15 18:47:55+00:00): მადლობა
დახმარებისთვის,ინფორმაციისთვის და დროული რეაგირებისთვის.
El-lizi Guesthouse (2018-08-15 19:06:15+00:00): 41.772660, 41.765394   აი ეს კორდინატი მივაწოდეთ booking-სდღეს Google Map-ის მიხედვით.თქვენც ზუსტად ამკორდინატით რომ შემისწოროდ.1 ოქტომბრის განახლებაში ,რომ დავამთხვიოთ booking,google და maps,me - ს მონაცემები
მადლობა
A-U-X (2018-08-15 21:04:06+00:00): ჩასწორებულია მითითებული კოორდინატების მიხედვით.
ველოდებით ოქტომბრის განახლებას ))
Palolo (2018-09-12 15:59:37+00:00): @[Iralyd jaimes] Thank you for your contributions.  Please only trace a path or road one time.
frosm (2018-08-12 23:18:56+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap
pouvez vous prendre la peine de décrire la raison de la modif ?
le lieux dit est erroné ? mal placé ? ou vandalisme ?
Howpper (2018-08-12 23:23:03+00:00): SH 41*
SimonPoole (2018-08-13 10:29:41+00:00): Hallo bjc

Bei diesem und anderen changesets gibts du "geodienste.ch" als Quelle an. Wenn es auch Datensätze auf geodienste.ch gibt die wir tatsächlich nutzen können (z..B. Kanton Wallis), ist es nicht generell so. Kannst du bitte generell bessere Angaben zum verwendeten Datensatz machen, und bei Unklarheiten dich and die talk-ch Liste wenden.

Ansonsten gibt es für den Kanton Bern durchaus Datensätze die wir nutzen dürfen, die beziehen wir aber direkt vom Kanton, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canton_of_Bern_Address_Import und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Datasources#Compliant_sources_from_Cantons

Danke
user_5359 (2018-08-13 04:07:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes. I have modified your entry.
Please don't forget to add the address information (from the change set comment) to the building.