piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rmikke (2022-03-03 12:02:44+00:00): Tym niemniej wg https://github.com/openstreetmap-polska/ua_2022/blob/main/Roboczy/apteki/woj_lubelskie-pow_tomaszowski-apteki_JPT_KOD_JE_0618.geojson apteki tu nie ma.
rmikke (2022-03-03 12:07:02+00:00): Dobra, zadzwoniłem do urzędu gminy naprzeciwko i potwierdzają istnienie apteki :)
voltairovicz (2022-03-03 14:19:57+00:00): Hah, niby rządowe dane a jednak też nie do końca można ufać, gdzieś tam na urzędowej linii utknęło i nie wpisali. w każdym razie jak widać, weryfikacja z ludźmi na miejscu najowocniejsza się okazała i sprawę możemy zamknąc ;) Zyczę jak najmniej takich bledow przy imporcie kolejnych aptek :)
eggie (2022-03-02 15:46:05+00:00): Guusje  Tip.. Je hoeft geen bicycle=designated toe te voegen aan een G11 fietspad.
Ik heb de tagging aangepast.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
MVG
eggie
Guusje2 (2022-03-02 15:48:13+00:00): Thanks voor de tip, hou ik rekening mee volgende keer!
eggie (2022-03-02 15:55:03+00:00): Weet je zeker 4.3 ?  Er heeft ooit een bord gestaan of het staat er nog met 4.8
Guusje2 (2022-03-02 15:56:56+00:00): Ik zal er maandag weer eens langsrijden, mijn herinnering zegt 4.3...
eggie (2022-03-02 16:00:22+00:00): Mooi..  Het kan best aangepast zijn..  Er zijn ook wegwerkzaamheden geweest hier.
Voor fietspaden zie

G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2022-03-02 16:03:30+00:00): De Bobbenagelseweg  aan de noordzijde staat namelijk ook op 4.8

Up to you
Guusje2 (2022-03-02 16:04:42+00:00): Dan zit ik waarschijnlijk fout.... Ik pas het aan!
praeteritum (2022-06-30 03:57:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123025422.
praeteritum (2022-06-30 03:54:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123025388.
user_5359 (2022-03-08 08:54:09+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag Zabobrze = Pastylka?
abrensch (2022-03-03 11:10:21+00:00): Hallo PStieler,

die beiden lift_gates am Bahnübergang Kelkheim habe ich wieder entfernt.

Die Bahnschranken sind durch "crossing:barrier" am Kreuzungsknoten vollständig und korrekt gemapped.

ein "lift_gate" ohne weiteres access-tagging ist eine Vollsperrung und macht das Routing kaputt.

Gruss, Arndt
leosw (2022-03-29 12:17:39+00:00): Ne pas référencer cette cabane sur internet : cabane privée, dans une réserve naturelle.
BrieucP (2022-03-29 12:19:36+00:00): il ne s'agit pas d'une cabane privée
leosw (2022-03-29 12:27:08+00:00): Oui pardon, d'une cabane en zone sensible, tolérée mais qui a besoin d'être discrète.
praeteritum (2022-06-29 05:36:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122983336.
happy5214 (2022-03-02 15:15:39+00:00): This takes the place of the diary post.

Basically, given the lack of available data about a collector system in this city, the criterion used was based on street construction, namely that all of the tagged tertiaries except for Hester (which was added for network completeness and due to its bridge over Deep Creek) have painted medians, whereas the rest of the "residential" streets don't.
highflyer74 (2022-07-18 14:51:54+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Beachte bitte, dass wir name=* nur verwenden, wenn etwas einen Namen hat und nicht, um Dinge zu beschreiben. Dass es sich um einen Hubschrauberlandeplatz handelt, ist durch aeroway=helipad bereits klar und datentechnisch auswertbar.

Schau Dir am besten einmal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice an, wo einige wichtige Dinge erklärt werden.

Viele Grüße!
Ong Kai Jin (2022-03-23 12:14:40+00:00): Oh Mah Gah
angys (2022-03-23 13:13:26+00:00): Meaningless comment
praeteritum (2022-06-29 05:35:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122983330.
kpv8 (2022-03-02 15:26:22+00:00): Schronisko znajduje się przy DW812 i jest oznaczone, nie wiem kto ci w tym miejscu dał lokalizację, ale jest błędna.
syntex (2025-07-27 12:05:59+00:00): pewnie jakiś błąd w rejestrze
Dimacn (2022-03-02 16:39:12+00:00): Может вы не будете добавлять дубли? 1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9504169144  2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9549783991
Dimacn (2022-03-02 16:42:09+00:00): Ещё дубли прям в одну точку: 1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8938928933   2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8938929138
Dimacn (2022-03-02 16:44:37+00:00): Ещё дубли: 1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9504169142   2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9549783990
Dimacn (2022-03-02 16:45:53+00:00): Ещё дубли:  1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9504169141   2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9549783989
喵耳引力波 (2022-05-26 05:21:33+00:00): 朋友你好，请不要随意删除边界关系中的标签，OSM数据维护都是其他编辑者的心血，在您不完全了解的时候请不要删除自己不懂的东西！谢谢

我在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121501209 退回了您的编辑，还望下次注意！
mariotomo (2022-03-03 21:04:15+00:00): hola. cuál otros mapas? (I'm living here, and I must tell you, this "PH" is sort of mistery to me here in Panamá.) corrections to names should come from direct observation, not from "other maps". please declare your sources, thank you!
praeteritum (2022-06-29 05:33:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122983245.
Jakka (2022-03-03 06:58:54+00:00): Hier is waarschijnlijk één garage met verkoop meerdere werken.
praeteritum (2022-06-28 04:41:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122935620.
user_5359 (2022-03-12 09:00:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9549828734. Did you mean ref instead fef?
20180911 (2022-03-12 16:37:58+00:00): Thank you for spotting this error. Cold fingers do not always hit the right key when being outside ;-)
praeteritum (2022-06-28 04:38:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122935592.
praeteritum (2022-06-28 04:36:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122935570.
lucumon (2022-03-31 08:10:55+00:00): Bos días Moncho, unha pregunta, de donde sacaches os nomes de "O Camiño Real" e "Camiño das Forcas" no parque das Cancelas?. Ademáis vin que engadiches algun toponimo como "O Monte de Freire", q sinceramente dubido que deba estar como neighbourhood, xa que realmente é o barrio das cancelas e ninguén coñece esa zona polo nome que ti empregaches.
Monchinho (2022-03-31 16:18:38+00:00): Prezado Lucumon.

Eses topónimos obtinos da web do Proxecto Galicia Nomeada da Real Academia Galega e Xunta de Galicia ( https://galicianomeada.xunta.gal/sixtop/visor ). Aí no visor pódense observar. Saúde.
lucumon (2023-05-26 22:45:55+00:00): Boas, teño outro comentario respecto a este conxunto de cambios. Topeime hoxe con que creaches un duplicado do barrio de Vista Alegre, neste caso con ID 9549825313, sendo o orixinal 3438056179. Ademáis fixéchelo como hamlet, que é aldea. Podes botarlle un ollo ao resto de modificacións feitas neste conxunto de cambios para comprobar que non existan outros casos similares?
Monchinho (2023-05-27 16:27:58+00:00): Ola, lucumon. Revisei todo o conxunto e fixen as correccións. Eliminei ese duplicado e cambiei o estado dalgunhas veciñanzas de aldea a veciñanza, máis axeitado na actualidade pola expansión urbanística. Penso que agora está ben. Saúde.
Syl (2023-07-18 09:09:05+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez mis shop=organic sur de nombreux commerces en France alors que ce n'est plus un tag utilisé (voir un de mes précédents messages), merci de les corriger et de les remplacer par les valeurs qu'ils avaient à l'origine.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2023-07-18 10:16:08+00:00): Bonjour, 
merci d votre alerte, 
nous allons les modifier .
Cordialement
alain
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-30 11:29:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9544439318 - to jest siłownia czy brama wjazdowa?

Czy Osm Go! nie potrafi bram zaznaczać ani notek tworzyć czy co tu się stało?
praeteritum (2022-06-28 04:35:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122935515.
praeteritum (2022-06-28 04:34:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122935496.
bxl-forever (2022-03-02 16:29:44+00:00): Hello again,

One more thing: you added barrier=hedge to the full outline of a garden.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035043187
It will look like the hedge is also separating the house and the garden.
I presume you’d rather draw the hedge along 3 borders of the gardens, not 4.

Unless of course there really is a hedge all around it.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-02 22:04:36+00:00): If you wish to tag turn lanes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118024687
user_5359 (2022-03-03 06:23:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9550018454. What is the meaning of opening_hours	= Mo-Su 00:00-00:00? Closed or Open? 
Generel question: Did you check on duplicate nodes?
user_5359 (2022-03-03 06:31:00+00:00): In total there are five points with this questionable information!
Allison P (2022-09-05 17:01:31+00:00): It seems very unlikely there is a residential road running through the shopping center. Does it have a name at all? It may just be a service road.
praeteritum (2022-06-28 04:34:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122935489.
zorglubu (2022-03-03 15:55:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Tu as ajouté une couleur à la ligne 380, puis tu l'as modifiée.
Or la première couleur correspondait bien aux couleurs Ratp comme ici : https://data.ratp.fr/explore/dataset/pictogrammes-des-lignes-de-metro-rer-tramway-bus-et-noctilien/images/?q=380
As-tu utilisé une autre source d'information ? Une photo ?

C'est pour cela qu'il est important de bien indiquer quelle est la source lorsque l'on fait une modification, c'est important pour que les autres contributeurs comprennent pourquoi une modification est faite.

Je te remercie par avance pour ta réponse.
zorglubu (2022-03-24 10:53:51+00:00): Rebonjour B75,
Tu contribues beaucoup à OpenStreetMap, en particulier sur les lignes de bus. Et tes contributions sont vraiment utiles.
Il est dommage que tu ne fasses pas l'effort de communiquer plus avec les autres contributeurs. Surtout que la plupart sont très bienveillants et que les échanges, en plus d'être enrichissants, peuvent même être agréables :-)
Bonne continuation sur OSM !
praeteritum (2022-06-28 04:33:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122935426.
Lachgast (2022-03-24 09:31:48+00:00): Mooi werk! Grappig, nog niet eens zo lang geleden dat je hier in de weer bent geweest.

Ik was net bij het "naastgelegen" kasteel bezig als uitloper van een rondgang langs de Kromme Rijn, maar wát is het een werk. Wel mooi als straks deze streek goed op de kaart staat, voegt echt wat toe!
Friendly_Ghost (2022-03-24 10:06:37+00:00): Hey Luciën! Ja, ik ben het met je eens dat deze omgeving van een facelift op de kaart veel profijt kan hebben. Het is immers een mooi gebied, maar omdat het zo dun bevolkt is zijn hier niet zoveel mappers bezig. Om hier te mappen moet je wel even goed gaan zitten, want er is zoals je zegt een hoop te doen. Ik vind het leuk dat we op deze manier een beetje kunnen samenwerken.
Lachgast (2022-03-24 10:16:09+00:00): Zeker leuk en ook een geruststellende gedachte er niet alleen voor te staan. Ik zag in een oude bewerking van Jeroen Schokker dat nabij de Broekweg op een paadje een route uit is gezet met oranje paaltjes. Ik zou wel willen weten wat er nog meer is uitgezet alhier en of dat ergens te verifiëren valt (buiten het veld).
Friendly_Ghost (2022-03-24 11:44:09+00:00): Goeie vraag. Van routes heb ik zelf geen verstand en ik ben hier ook alleen maar aan het armchair mappen, dus misschien weten mensen op het forum dit.
confusedbuffalo (2022-03-05 10:34:32+00:00): Watch out for collection times, there's a specific format that should be followed.

e..g you put "Mon - Fri 17:45; Sat 11:45"
But it should be "Mo-Fr 17:45; Sa 11:45"

I know it seems trivial but the tag is designed to be machine readable
jdconey (2022-03-05 15:53:56+00:00): My bad, sorry. I think I've been a bit guilty of this on some recent postboxes - going back to fix the others now, thanks for doing this one!
jdconey (2022-03-05 15:57:34+00:00): ah you've beaten me to it, thanks.
confusedbuffalo (2022-03-05 18:50:24+00:00): You're welcome
I was using https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/osm-collection-times.html
to look for collection time issues and fixed all of the low hanging fruit
Glassman (2022-03-03 17:11:02+00:00): It looks like you duplicated some of the roads. I went ahead and removed the duplicates.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118025653
praeteritum (2022-06-28 04:28:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122935312.
Glassman (2022-03-03 17:15:48+00:00): Instead of adding a name to the driveways - a better approach is to add a address node for the house. I went ahead and did that. Routers should be able to use that information to route to the correct house.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118025892
Leo Slager (2022-03-03 12:05:24+00:00): Why are you adding buildings to the map ? All of those building were already on the map.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=5.23174&lat=50.81276&zoom=16&opacity=0.73
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-03-05 18:09:32+00:00): Hmmm... Seems like mapcomplete loaded the OSM buildings too late
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118025995
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:46:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887881.
jeslop (2022-03-02 18:11:18+00:00): Hola Junigis, gracias por unirte a OSM y bienvenido.

En OSM la etiqueta name no se utiliza para los nombres descriptivos, lo puedes ver en la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-07 05:47:43+00:00): لماذا غيرت اسم شعيب ابو ثنايا؟
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:44:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887868.
kuhni74 (2024-10-12 11:46:40+00:00): is "trail" meant to be for bicycles? if yes, there should be bicycle=yes
kuhni74 (2024-10-12 22:28:23+00:00): I was there today and saw no sign or anything else that would justify bicycle=yes
Opadeira (2024-10-13 17:53:10+00:00): It was built for bicycle=yes by bicycle=yes people
Oregonian3 (2022-03-02 17:14:47+00:00): Thanks for improving on my work here. When I mapped the forest I couldn't decide if I wanted to exclude the ski runs or not, since they're certainly not natural features :) But in retrospect, I think it makes sense to like you're doing, since they're what is actually reality now.
tcarlisle (2022-03-02 17:43:52+00:00): It's cool that you're adding natural feature detail. I'm not trying to undo your work, I just figured I would add some detail to some areas.  I thought about adding natural features to the ski resorts a long time ago, but I didn't since it is a lot of work lol.  But since you have started adding natural features to the area it incentivized me to add some detail.
Kepler Sticka-Jones (2022-03-03 16:59:46+00:00): Just jumping in to add that I love the natural feature work that both of you have done so far. I've really only done small patches of natural features in the Cottonwood Heights city boundaries, but might look at continuing that work up canyon with y'all's work as inspiration. :D
Oregonian3 (2022-03-03 17:44:35+00:00): Thanks!
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:42:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887835.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-07 05:48:00+00:00): لماذا حذفت شعيب ابو ثنايا؟
Dodko (2022-03-03 11:45:56+00:00): namiesto 
surface=dlažba
použite
surface=paving_stones
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:surface
Samuel Chávez (2022-03-17 14:46:43+00:00): Hola joserrg12 no has querido responder ninguno de mis comentarios en anteriores changesets y éstas etiquetando lugares que como éste 3a Calle S.E. el que en ningún momento es un callejón, es una calle que no cumple con esas condiciones principalmente por su ancho y uso. Esto además se puede comprobar mediante la imagery satelital. Te adjunto el url del wiki: (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:service%3Dalley) para que veas que estas en un error. Este es el último mensaje antes de reportarte por evitar justificar tus ediciones, te voy a dar un día más de plazo.
joserrg12 (2022-03-17 18:43:31+00:00): Sí, efectivamente esa mal y está para corregirse, gracias.
Samuel Chávez (2022-03-17 19:13:52+00:00): Bueno gracias por la respuesta. Disculpame pero son muchos los usuarios que contacto para avisarles de errores y nunca responden un solo comentario.
joserrg12 (2022-03-17 19:45:41+00:00): Hombre, nada que agradecer, estamos para ayudarnos y lo entiendo, a veces es difícil y hasta molesto. Pero el objetivo es el mismo, tratar de hacerlo bien.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:41:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887719.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-02 19:53:23+00:00): Why are these roads deleted? If they are private or other classification just tag as such
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118027320
txemt (2022-03-02 19:56:22+00:00): Most are non existent roads.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-02 20:20:49+00:00): If they exist as tracks shouldn't they be mapped as such? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118027320
txemt (2022-03-02 20:26:15+00:00): Those roads fit none of the description of use for those roads in the link you provided. These roads are on private ranch lands and serve 0 value to anyone except for the owner of the land.

These roads do not have a connective network to anything outside of the fence line. There's no reason to mark them as track or have them on a map.
MikeN (2022-03-02 20:37:26+00:00): In some parts of the country, these private roads are useful as reference in fighting landscape fires or missing persons searches.
txemt (2022-03-02 20:39:03+00:00): Maybe in California, but not in Texas.
MoiraPrime (2022-03-02 21:51:53+00:00): Uhhh, I'm pretty sure removing valid data from the map is considered vandalism, no matter how "useful" you consider the data.
txemt (2022-03-02 21:54:01+00:00): It's not valid data. It's been there since the TIGER import. Valid data I'm deleting. If there's a valid reason for a road segment, I'm not deleting it. I'll look at it and maybe make a few minor changes, but I've been leaving valid stuff alone.
SherbetS (2022-03-02 22:14:18+00:00): If it exists in the real world, it's valid data. if the classification is wrong, the correct thing to do is update classification and add an access tag if you need to.
txemt (2022-03-02 22:16:07+00:00): A grain of sand exists in the real world. Do we map and tag that as well?
Trevor_1 (2022-03-02 23:52:00+00:00): Some of the Tiger roads should be deleted if they don't match the imagery at all, but if it's a driveway or a track road, then it should be reclassified.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:36:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887649.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:34:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887645.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:33:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887636.
Lee Carré (2022-03-03 16:16:42+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:33:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887604.
Syl (2022-03-03 12:02:58+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez modifié de nombreux éléments ici en plus de la fontaine. Vous avez notamment supprimé un distributeur de billets à la gare et une route sur un parking, c'est ce que vous vouliez faire ? Avant d'envoyer vos modifications un récapitulatif est affiché vous permettant de voir ce que vous avez modifié/supprimé.

Concernant les fontaines la plupart de celles d'Angers sont représentées par une surface (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023027128) et la statue par un point (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023027128), enlever que le point est une statue pour mettre que c'est une fontaine n'est donc pas nécessaire.
Syl (2022-03-03 12:03:56+00:00): Petite erreur dans message, voici le lien vers la statue : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9434744457
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:32:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887592.
tastrax (2022-03-08 03:57:34+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Jorisbo (2022-03-08 06:20:09+00:00): Hi tastrax! Thx for the effort. Grrtz Joris
user_5359 (2022-03-06 15:22:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please explain you comment and your modification!
See https://www.osm.org/node/9550289420, https://www.osm.org/node/9550289421,
https://www.osm.org/node/9550289418
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
SomeoneElse (2022-03-10 11:40:04+00:00): Hello "garmin user",
In this changeset you've added some ways to the "MTB City Road" relation so that it went from https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gFE to https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1gFF .  According to the person who operates that, these ways should not be part of that relation.  They may well exist, but just not part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12576391/history .
If you've got any other questions please ask.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-10 11:40:36+00:00): Здраво "гармин корисник",
У овом скупу измена сте додали неке начине вези „МТБ Цити Роад“ тако да је она прешла са хттпс://оверпасс-турбо.еу/с/1гФЕ на хттпс://оверпасс-турбо.еу/с/1гФФ . Према ономе ко то води, ови начини не би требало да буду део тог односа. Можда постоје, али једноставно нису део хттпс://ввв.опенстреетмап.орг/релатион/12576391/хистори.
Ако имате још питања, питајте.
Срдачан поздрав,
Анди Товнсенд, из ОСМ-ове радне групе за податке.
Dodko (2022-03-03 11:54:54+00:00): Zmazanú budovu som obnovil.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772813860/history

a duplicitný bod odstránil
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9550288900/history
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:31:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887585.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:30:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887523.
praeteritum (2022-06-27 04:28:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122887516.
Trevor_1 (2022-03-04 23:35:07+00:00): If you're going to copy off TxDot's Functional Classification map, maybe you should bump everything down a level. You've done this to multiple towns in the Texas Panhandle.
Trevor_1 (2022-03-04 23:36:19+00:00): FM 2203 was fine the way it was, it didn't need to be changed to primary.
conradoos (2022-03-09 15:00:20+00:00): Cześć,
1) nie stosujemy samego area=yes. Trzeba dodać odpowiednie znaczniki, które będą opisywać to, co tam jest.
2) Co jest na tym terenie? Bo na zdjęciach lotniczych widać, że jest tam zbiornik, w którym nie ma wody. Czy tam w ogóle nie ma wody, czy jednak czasem jest tam woda? Bo jeżeli woda tam czasem jest, to było prawidłowo oznaczone.