piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AjBelnuovo (2020-08-09 16:14:44+00:00): I'll try one more time . I have already asked a question about the change in the nomenclature of petrol in the OSMBrasil community and I did not get an answer at all .
jimmyhendrix (2020-08-05 18:41:21+00:00): Hallo,
das Wegekreuz ist seit einigen Wochen bereits gemappt. Nun ist es zweimal vorhanden. Steht es denn nun nicht mehr am bisher gemappten Standort Lüttelforst Ecke Zufahrtsstraße unter dem Baum?
Viele Grüße
waldhans (2020-08-05 20:36:21+00:00): Mein Fehler; habe das im Vorüberfahren fotografiert und danach die Position bestimmt. Und deine Eingabe nicht gesehen. Habe „mein“ Kreuz gelöscht. Danke schön!
jimmyhendrix (2020-08-06 06:50:08+00:00): Super, vielen Dank!
Frans S (2020-08-07 15:35:02+00:00): Hello. Thank you so much for mapping on this project
A remark. Please map more accurate and follow the outlines of a building
You tend to map oversized and collect buildings as being 1 building
I copy in a PM a few advises how to improve your mapping skills
Best regards and keep mapping
ququruzka (2020-08-05 18:17:13+00:00): umnichka
AlexRiabtsev (2020-08-05 19:07:35+00:00): нінадо тут! пристойне місце, а не якась наливайка ;)
user_5359 (2020-08-07 04:30:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834253430. What is the meaning of the tag Abarrotes Isla Tiburón=es:Punta Chueca?
mdelatorre (2020-08-11 02:01:26+00:00): My mistake mueschel. Fixed!
eggie (2020-08-05 19:01:05+00:00): Dag Raymond..  Is dit werkelijk de naam van het chalet?
MVG,
Eggie
Wishius (2020-08-06 06:43:35+00:00): Це не школа, це реабілітаційний центр 
 "VIA VITA"
orest_m_j (2020-08-06 06:59:36+00:00): Завершую карту шкіл Львівщини. Може ви знаєте де в цьому селі школа Княжівська ЗОШ. Буду вдячний
Wishius (2020-08-06 08:05:37+00:00): Додав нотатку на карту
geri-oc (2020-08-07 13:29:32+00:00): Hello, you received some comments about your changes because of errors. Please answer there or register in the forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=69743
Greetings Gerd
Tómas Ingi (2020-08-05 18:11:35+00:00): Hi,

I believe this short stretch of cycle path is intended as a one-way, seeing as it is a direct continuation of the shared-lane markings on Lynghagi. The other direction is provided via Starhagi, where a similarly short stretch is located. While the one-ways are not shown explicitly by arrows, I would argue that they are implied by the one-ways on aforementioned streets along with the direction that the painted bicycle icon is facing.
flother (2020-08-06 10:03:53+00:00): Hi,

I think you're right that this and the other path you mention are just sort of continuations of Lynghagi and Starhagi. I've reinstated the one-way tag in changeset 89030841.

It does feel fussy to tag them as one-way though — it's not something anyone's really going to pay attention to. But to try and stop anyone getting stuck I've added the bicycle=yes tag to nearby paths to make sure routers can get cyclists onto the cyclepath against the one-way flow.

M.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-27 11:34:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 91579459 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits near Buckingham that were made (according to the changeset comments) using an inappropriate source.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89872984 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-27 11:34:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 91579459 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits near Buckingham that were made (according to the changeset comments) using an inappropriate source.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89872984 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-27 11:34:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 91579459 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits near Buckingham that were made (according to the changeset comments) using an inappropriate source.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89872984 .
bhietsch (2020-08-10 15:11:01+00:00): Thanks for working on this! These were the last couple pieces I needed to complete the trail relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1820324
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-27 11:34:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 91579459 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits near Buckingham that were made (according to the changeset comments) using an inappropriate source.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89872984 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-27 11:34:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 91579459 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits near Buckingham that were made (according to the changeset comments) using an inappropriate source.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89872984 .
user_5359 (2020-08-07 04:57:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on way http://www.osm.org/way/834069098: What is the meaning of tag "area espe"="espe".

Other hint: there are eleven (!) overlapping area with amenity=university. Please work with the other local contributors and not against each other!
crmerriman (2020-08-10 13:24:38+00:00): I need to check this again.  I noticed an old sign post that didn't jump out at me initially. This wasn't the typical street signs we have in town, the sign did have Manitock Hill Rd. on it.  I will have to go there on one of my runs to get a closer look.
Karthoo (2021-07-29 12:37:11+00:00): Hallo rza31, irgendwas ist hier wohl schiefgelaufen: Du hast den Asia Shop in eine amenity=driving_school umgewandelt aber den Namen nicht geändert. Würdest du das nochmal anschauen?
Grüße,
Karthoo
rza31 (2021-07-30 07:55:47+00:00): Hallo Karthoo, danke für deinen Hinweis, erledigt. ;-)
woodpeck (2020-08-08 11:51:09+00:00): Hello wellasus, do you have an explanation for this changeset claiming that you have used the 7 different imagery layers "Maxar-Premium", "Bing Streetside", "Mapillary Images", "Mapillary Map Features", "Mapillary Signs", "OpenStreetCam Images", and "Bing" - and all that to add one driveway and modify two other highways? Did you really cycle through all these imagery sources to make these contributions? It is helpful for other mappers to know which imagery was used for a certain object, but a list like that is more confusing than helpful.
wellasus (2020-08-10 06:23:00+00:00): Thanks for checking it on our edits. I have enabled all the imagery to check its availability in the osm and make necessary changes. All the enabled sources are auto populated while saving the edits. Apologies, I have not modified the sources before saving the edits. thanks for the suggestions. going forward, i will be modifying the sources used accordingly. always happy to learn from the community
user_5359 (2020-08-06 04:58:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834301045. This isn't a building.
mariotomo (2020-11-04 15:06:32+00:00): "ab" es parte del nombre así como está en la portada, o la abreviación/simplificación que le pusiste.  y si es una abreviación, quién lo va a mejorar?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-08-21 14:59:24+00:00): voce colocou letras na população, quando só devia conter numeros no ponto de Cairu, corrigido com a população atual agora https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/415522570
wille (2021-07-08 12:01:41+00:00): Além disso, não se deve usar pontos no valor de population, pois, em inglês, ponto marca o decimal não o milhar.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88996489
user_5359 (2020-08-06 05:05:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use lowercase for key and value: building=yes instead Building=Yes.
Cucazer (2020-08-06 18:21:16+00:00): There is no need to tag simple polygon of a single building as multipoligon with several connected lines
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88996635
fabiotofy (2020-08-13 07:03:38+00:00): Ciao, ho visto l'aggiunta dei civici 116 (a-n) e del civico 120 di Viale Europa con riferimento alla nuova lotizzazione fronte il "Garden Lignano". I medesimi civici però sono già assegnati al palazzo sito nei pressi della rotonda con via Tarvisio.
eggie (2020-08-05 20:00:18+00:00): Dag Erik
In dit geval zou ik access=yes weghalen als algemene tag en alleen de specifieke verboden taggen. 
MVG,
Eggie
FrankOverman (2020-08-05 19:19:26+00:00): Als iemand kan kijken of de tags OK zijn voor dit soort monumenten / memorials.
HellMap (2023-06-04 11:39:11+00:00): Hello!

I see you retagged a lot sidewalks into cycleways in this changeset. I only passed a few here, but the vast majority of them did not have any cycleway signage and definitely no segregation. Some short segments may indeed be cycleways, but not the entire ways.

I know it's been a few years since you edited this, so you probably don't remember the details. But I just wanted to clarify how you tagged them. Because your comment says you drove through here, but you wouldn't have encountered cycleways at least in some locations where you tagged them. Was it approximate or based on signs on one end?

I'm not sure how to fix this short-term other than to revert all cycleways back to sidewalks and then survey one at a time. But there certainly isn't such extensive cycleway infrastructure here.

Thanks
huopa (2023-06-05 13:07:53+00:00): Ok, this might be my mistake by misunderstanding something about the cycling and walking infrastructure in Latvia. I did bike here about one full day and if I remember correctly, asked from some local where I can bike and marked a couple of them down and assumed a few others to be the same as they were "identical" in my view. But you may be right of course that they are not official ones and I was mistaken by some local individual who might have not been aware of how it works (officially). 

We could reverse those changes if there are no easy way to revert cycleways from the changeset. I am coming to town to bike again next summer (this summer will be exception as I don't have a chance to stop by in Riga area). I can come and check them again.

Thanks for checking them and sorry for the mistakes.. this is the way to improve them properly.
HellMap (2023-06-05 13:51:09+00:00): Thanks for clarifying!

I understand now where the tagging comes from, so I can adjust from there with more confidence.

Of course, I cannot guess what the local meant when directing you, but I can briefly explain the local traffic laws and tagging.

An official legal cycleway is any way that has a blue round cycleway sign. There is an overview here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Veloce%C4%BCi_un_veloinfrastrukt%C5%ABra Unless there's a sign, it's not legally a cycleway. Latvia doesn't have a great deal of cycling infrastructure and Jurmala has relatively more than other places. But still the vast majority of roads here do not.

In theory, a cycleway sign designates the section as cycleway until the next intersection. In practice, the signs sometimes don't repeat - which is technically/legally invalid, and one must be careful tagging this, because our infrastructure is such as it is. If there is an "end of cycleway" sign later, then likely the whole segment is intended as cycleway. There are places in Latvia like this where one has to cycle the whole length of a sidewalk to realize it's all meant to be under this cycleway sign. Or indeed only the first segment(s) were meant as such. So I could have crossed these sidewalks and never known it was actually a shared cycleway, because the signs were far away. I have no way to know unless I bike the whole length.

In addition, bicycles in Latvia are allowed on sidewalks (and any footway, really). There is a principle in the traffic law that cyclists should use the cycling infrastructure or the road itself. But there's a very broad exception where they can essentially use the sidewalks. Practically, people bike on sidewalks. And when you ask someone where you can bike - they are likely to mention sidewalks and not roads. Few people are well-versed in the legal distinction, but most people understand that everyone practically cycles "everywhere".

From your comments, I think most of these are not cycleways, but just sidewalks. It's possible there are some segments that are marked as cycleways. There is only limited and dated Mapillary available here to check (for now, but I'm slowly working on covering this location). I am only somewhat familiar with this area, so I was hesitant to simply untag these ways. But I think I will manually untag the sidewalks that I do not believe to be likely to be cycleways.
huopa (2023-06-05 21:31:02+00:00): Thanks for the explanation! It is close to my home country setup (Finland) as basically the signs are the same (EU standards I believe), but I just took the instructions from the local(s) a bit too literally without really thinking about the sign legality.

So the cycling routes are meant to use the car lanes for biking on those sections where the sidewalks are meant for walking only. Good work! I must be more careful about those in the future.
eggie (2020-08-05 19:36:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review.. het was allemaal al goed getagd hier..
service=Bus_lane  is geen valide tag. 
Een value begint niet met een hoofdletter. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-08-05 20:08:06+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bus_lanes
Volgens mij kan die hele regel hier weg
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-06 06:41:18+00:00): Hello Skombi. Thanks for your contribution. I delete highway (Way 834314329) because not exist on the imagery (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30186/task/142911784). Thank you.
mariotomo (2020-11-04 15:06:09+00:00): "Sm Jael" es el nombre así como está en la portada, o la abreviación/simplificación que le pusiste.  y si es una abreviación, quién lo va a mejorar?
literan (2020-08-10 20:43:24+00:00): отписал твои контакты в УВД
DaveF (2020-12-28 18:06:02+00:00): Hi
Instead of vandalism tagging why don't you amend inaccurate features to improve the quality of the OSM database?
messpert (2020-12-28 20:03:14+00:00): I rather thought that was what I had been doing for many years. I see that I have uploaded 871 public gps tracks so far  in addition to my private traces. They have all been used to improve the quality of the OSM database. I take great care to map as accurately as I can almost always from ground survey. It is annoying when armchair mappers ignore source tags and history and override properly surveyed areas. 
Not that my mapping cannot be improved...
jmilot (2021-08-04 17:33:45+00:00): Hi,

Quick question. Why was "chemin hemmings" renamed in this changeset? All local signalisation have an "s" to it.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-08-05 10:11:26+00:00): I verified and officially, there is no "s" at Chemin Hemming. See this sign for instance: https://chaire-mobilite.civil.polymtl.ca/cmm2018tiles/0/0/chemin_hemming
jmilot (2021-08-05 19:29:36+00:00): Which intersection is this? This seems to have the coat of arms of Drummondville on it. I'm talking about the section that runs through St-Lucien.

You can check at 45.8485694,-72.3089052 (Route Des Rivières / Ch. Hemmings) and 45.8399929,-72.2678584 (Rang 4 / Chemin Hemmings).

Both intersection have an "s".
jmilot (2021-08-05 19:31:15+00:00): I'm referencing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43521892 to be precise.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-08-05 20:19:25+00:00): Ok, it seems that outside of Drummondville the Hemming avenue has a "s. like you told me! Thanks. Fixed!
rbradt (2020-08-10 22:11:34+00:00): Data is differentially corrected Trimble data.
tekim (2020-08-11 13:06:49+00:00): Hi rbradt,
It is great that you have access to a professional grade GPS, and made the effort to apply a differential correction.  If you cite this in your change set comments and source, other mappers will be less likely to reposition the feature in question using a less accurate source. I have had this happen to me, which is why I put the comment in both the change set, as well as the note tag on the feature itself.  You can also use the source:geometry tag.  Not all mappers will understand what "differential correction" is, so you might want to put it in layman's terms.  If you just say that your source is "GPX" other mappers will probably assume you are just using a consumer grade GPS/smart phone/fitness watch.

After receiving your comment, I did review the features in question and compared the version prior to, and after my change, and there was very little difference.  
Mike
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:38:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89001163
Russbiggs (2021-02-06 18:22:47+00:00): I'm removing this because this looks like personal info of the resident which is not allowed
user_8334278 (2020-08-05 20:57:24+00:00): i was there this is what i saw.
Nmxosm (2020-08-06 07:16:32+00:00): Hallo osmhawk,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. 

Das area=yes ist an dieser Stelle zwar nicht falsch, aber unnötig (siehe https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Area und https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Duniversity). Dafür müsste man also keine Energie aufwenden.

Zum Überblick sind die folgenden Seiten sicher hilfreich:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Bei Fragen melde dich bitte einfach als Antwort hier, schreib unter https://forum.osm.org/ oder einer der zahlreichen Mailinglisten (z.B. http://lists.osm.org/mailman/listinfo/talk-de) oder erstelle eine Note (https://osm.org/note/new)

Ich hoffe, ich konnte dir erstmal weiterhelfen.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2021-02-21 07:19:56+00:00): Ich habe das mit https://osm.org/changeset/99669360 umgesetzt.
dieterdreist (2020-09-16 09:46:25+00:00): Ciao Ludofru,

ho visto che hai inserito degli highway=crossing con crossing=marked. Penso sarebbe meglio inserire gli incroci con le strisce (solo strisce) come crossing=zebra e quelle con i semafori crossing=traffic_lights. Che ne pensi?

Un saluto,
Martin
dieterdreist (2020-09-16 09:47:36+00:00): Hi Ludofru,
I just noticed you are using an English locale. Question is about crossing=marked. This is a very unspecific tag, I would encourage you to use crossing=zebra and crossing=traffic_lights instead. Thank you.
Martin
dieterdreist (2020-09-16 09:59:16+00:00): sorry for the type, of course I meant crossing=traffic_signals
dieterdreist (2023-03-26 23:19:33+00:00): cancellato anche il way originale del circo massimo del 2007, way 11358744
jollybubbly (2020-08-05 21:21:50+00:00): Source: https://www.parks.ca.gov/pages/561/files/HCcampgroundlPDF092909.pdf (Forgot to add it).
mueschel (2020-08-06 09:48:55+00:00): Hi Eric,
welcome to OSM.
You added several tags here that are not used in any other place. OSM only works, if everybody uses the same, documented tags for features. Please be so kind and read some editing guides or the wiki to find out about common tags.

Jan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
SHARCRASH (2022-06-01 20:30:50+00:00): Hi! You had changed this area i had created from bare_rock to sand... I don't recall any sandy spot. I tried to check back my photo and on several from internet just in case i may have missed one but none show sand. In these following photos we can clearly see it's mainly bare rock
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d7/Porte_de_Pierre%2C_Vosges.jpg
http://ekladata.com/9S135cA7Ju7Km-XBGoqrA1pudC0@750x563.jpg
http://ekladata.com/ztTNgOITw8dEq-ROHQS164X1nUY@750x563.jpg
https://www.visit.alsace/wp-content/uploads/lei/pictures/215003919-pleasure-trails-jardin-des-fees-porte-de-pierre-rocher-de-mutzig-1.jpg
A misstag in such an element is not really much influential but i hope you are better at tagging highways which can dangerously mislead people in mountains and i experienced in this area...
SHARCRASH (2022-06-01 20:31:08+00:00): This area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505117859
maraf24 (2020-08-05 22:17:50+00:00): Spręgliny-uroczysko-dawna wieś wg PRNG
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-07-07 03:37:58+00:00): Hi Hernan, this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834349208#map=15/-27.4096/-55.6996 tagged as residential and share the same way with another object. can u recheck it ?
Hernan (2021-07-07 12:36:00+00:00): That way was marked by a colleague of his with the tag highway = residential, along with many others. I have already written to you to stop making these erroneous edits in areas that you do not know, and without communicating with the local community because we are going to have to report your work to the DWG
Greetings
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-07-08 03:11:24+00:00): Thanks for rechecking this mate. I didn't recognize that one of my friend mappers was the one who added it accidentally. I think I focused on the other issue while checking this so I thought it was you. I apologize for this inconvenience. Thanks mate.
kapazao (2020-08-06 13:35:17+00:00): Hola, no es correcto usar como sendero y vía fluvial una misma línea, deberían separarse y cada una tener los atributos correctos según el tipo de vía. Se podrían poner como vías paralelas, por supuesto no superpuestas.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89004059
arte2002 (2020-08-09 14:40:48+00:00): Hola, en este caso la acequia y el sendero utilizan el mismo recorrido, reamente el sendero utiliza la acequia como recorrido, tampoco he observado ningún error en osmose al respecto.

Saludos
aharvey (2020-08-06 01:39:45+00:00): hi since this is affecting a major feature I'll revert this first, then follow up with discussion about the change is a minute.
aharvey (2020-08-06 01:51:38+00:00): hi I reverted this change because I noticed it combined the city and suburb nodes, which broke both the suburb and city relations for Sydney.

The Sydney place=suburb https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5729534, similar to other suburbs should have a label node per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members and it should be tagged with the same place= tag as the relation. So the place=suburb relation for Sydney can have a label node also with place=suburb.

The Sydney place=city (not the city of sydney lga) relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5750005 also can have it's own place=city label node, and it in this case also has an admin_center node.

The way you combined the place=suburb and place=city nodes broke this. Happy to discuss this further either here, or on talk-au or on the maptimeoceania slack.
aharvey (2020-08-06 01:52:25+00:00): this changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89005958
Damdandüşen (2020-11-21 11:11:36+00:00): Bu yerin adı Azmak Nehri değildir!!! Azmak zaten bir coğrafi oluşumun yerel söylenişidir. Bu oluşumun adı "Kadın Azmağı" lütfen biri bu hatayı düzeltsin.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
tduncan2 (2020-08-06 01:02:28+00:00): I'm new to this open street map editing, I see my comments are truncated, There appear to be problems with the software showing warnings about non-existent overlaps. I would like to know how to get rid of previous edits by others that show far less precision than my own ballpark digitization.
MikeN (2020-08-06 11:25:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM!   The reason for many of the warnings were that the large landuse area (residential) was changed to building=apartments.    Also, buildings do not need a name 'apartment' since the building type has been set to 'apartments'