piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
madnikhi (2021-08-20 11:13:26+00:00): Hello SafetyIng, 
Thanks for checking this. I have now changed the geometry as per aerial imagery. Kindly look into the changeset(109981716) with modifications and please let me know if there is any miss from my end. 
Regards,
madnikhi
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
EinKonstanzer (2021-08-19 21:55:39+00:00): Warum hast du einfach die Gebäude gelöscht und nicht einfach die Lifecycle Prefixe benutzt? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Im Kataster sind die Gebäude nämlich noch vorhanden.

Mit Prefixen ist die Sachelage jedoch schnell klar, und die Gebäude tauchen trotzdem nicht mehr in der Karte auf.
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
SekeRob (2021-08-19 09:13:00+00:00): Sorry, no idea why I landed here but when I'm in Italy and edit sets appear in my local change set history I look why someone creates half Europe noticing edits with maproulette, I look.
SekeRob (2021-08-19 09:13:29+00:00): ... again
francians (2021-08-19 09:46:08+00:00): Ciao,

Ma si tratta di un problema di osmand che hai aggiunto il wikidata per un playground?

Francesco
Brazzelli Roberto (2021-08-21 13:34:04+00:00): Ciao, l'ho inserito di proposito. Devo approfindire wikidata, mi sembreva corretto. Se hai informazioni a proposito ben venga.
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
Javier Sanchez (2021-08-23 13:14:59+00:00): Incorrecto. Duplicado https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/95165322
itrivi (2021-08-23 13:53:09+00:00): Perdón, lo leí en una descripción del sendero S-23, y lo que está claro es que el nombre anterior, "Narices del Teide", también era incorrecto. Si te parece bien, habría que eliminar este nodo.
Javier Sanchez (2021-08-23 14:33:53+00:00): Hecho. Gracias por mejorar el mapa.
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
Frans S (2021-08-19 13:23:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
kumartcx (2021-08-20 11:17:27+00:00):  Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs.I really appreciate the feedback shared regarding mapping buildings. I've made the neccessary changes in the changeset #109975842.
Going ahead, I'll ensure to square the buildings while mapping them.
Thanks again, Happy mapping!

Regards,
kumartcx
eggie (2021-08-19 11:05:42+00:00): Dag bomendokter..
Eigenlijk is highway=road niet correct
Dat gebruik je alleen als je nog niet weet wat de wegklassen is.

Gebruik svp leisure=track
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtrack

Waarom access=no hier?
access=no is bijna altijd fout. Het betekent Verboden Toegang.

Groet,
eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 11:23:24+00:00): highway = road omgezet naar leisure=track
access=no verwijderd
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 11:26:45+00:00): De slagbomen even als voorbeeld op nodes getagd die verbonden zijn met de weg.
De andere slagbomen zou je zo ook kunnen aanpassen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 10:30:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
L'imaginaire (2021-08-20 21:19:28+00:00): I have reverted your changeset after discussing it with a few fellow Belgian mappers. Please only map features that are actually existing in the real world.
SGorskiy (2021-08-19 11:12:56+00:00): Привет. Буковки надо в верхнем регистре ставить. Тут подробнее про нумерацию: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#%D0%9D%D1%83%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2

Рекомендую ознакомиться.
eggie (2021-08-20 08:10:45+00:00): Dag bomendokter.. Je vraagt feedback.
Een lift_gate zet je op één node verbonden met de weg. Deze constructie met twee liftgates en een lijn ertussen gaat niet werken.
Bij de ingang Zalné weg heb ik de slagbomen zoals bomen aangepast.
Up to you.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-20 15:25:11+00:00): typo  . bomen?  >  boven
Daniel-Alf Junghänel (2021-08-19 09:50:33+00:00): GPS-Track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Daniel-Alf%20Jungh%C3%A4nel/traces/3789277
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
eggie (2021-08-19 10:49:30+00:00): Tip:  Deze toevoegingen doen echt niets in de routering.
Een lift_gate gewoon verbinden met de weg op één knoop.. Dus niet een lijntje spannen tussen twee slagbomen. 
Het is geen kritiek dat er geen slagbomen horen.
Kijk svp nog eens goed naar de wiki.
Ook al die losse slagbomen bij de ingang is allemaal cosmetisch. Het doet niets. 
gr eggie
mavl (2021-08-20 13:52:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
4004 (2021-08-23 00:26:11+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
в осм мы не пишем описания обьектов в название, а задаем это тегами.
также все поля тегов заполняются на английском, если вы хотите, чтобы эта информация была полезна кому то, кроме вас.
ну и некоторые обьекты, что вы нарисовали, я не вижу на снимках - вы обрисовывали какой то план?
eggie (2021-08-19 09:50:45+00:00): Beste Bomendokter.. Waarom geen lift_gate op een node verbonden met de weg. Dan werkt het in de routering 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dlift_gate

Nu geeft het alleen maar een berg foutmeldingen.
MVG
eggie
LySioS (2021-08-22 21:17:29+00:00): Bonjour Mattéo,
Merci de ne pas pourrir le travail de beaucoup de bénévoles.
Si tu veux contribuer correctement, n'hésite pas à me contacter.
A+
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109921723
eggie (2021-08-19 10:34:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Sanniu (2021-08-24 05:29:41+00:00): Hi

The ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974604330, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974604327,https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974605085 have no tags.
Can you add appropriate tags, please?
Sanniu (2021-11-10 08:32:29+00:00): Hi
Thanks for fixing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974604330, but the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974605085 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974604327 still has no tags...
mavl (2021-08-20 13:42:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109989624 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942156].
Jakka (2021-08-21 08:53:56+00:00): perhaps https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dprinting
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109923579
eggie (2021-08-19 10:38:37+00:00): Dag Max.. Beter access=no verwijderen van een bollard. Dat kan wel eens problemen geven..
motor_vehicle=no is ook default. 
mofa en moped, motorcycle=yes is wel nuttig. Dat is nl niet default.

Op reguliere wegen hoeft niet oneway=no 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 10:41:59+00:00): Wat leesvoer.. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
eggie (2021-08-19 10:57:09+00:00): iets aangepast
mavl (2021-08-20 13:52:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
mavl (2021-08-20 13:42:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109989624 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942156].
rocky2109 (2021-08-19 10:25:32+00:00): Corrected the road-railway intersection from Keepright issue and added surface tag #MSFTOpenMaps
Jakka (2021-12-11 16:47:38+00:00): dit staat vermeld ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109924144
Jakka (2021-12-11 16:48:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2967602
mavl (2021-08-20 13:55:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990244 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942315].
mavl (2021-08-20 13:42:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109989624 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942156].
eggie (2021-08-20 07:31:10+00:00): Dag Wieke.. Je vraagt om feedback.. lijkt me oke zo , maar geldt dit dan niet voor het oostelijke verloop dat ook op oneway=yes staat?

Wanneer je oneway:bicycle=no toevoegt kun je de 'oude' tagging cycleway=opposite verwijderen.
Wanneer het ook voor brommers geldt dan 
oneway:moped=no
oneway:mofa=no

toevoegen..
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-20 07:43:07+00:00): Wieke,
Bovenstaande tagging bij alle wegen in de wijk toegevoegd.. Je eigen bijdrage zou anders weinig zin hebben.

Gr eggie 
MVG
eggie
jmty8 (2021-08-20 07:05:27+00:00): +brought back car_wash tag
jmty8 (2021-08-20 07:05:34+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/2611673312
mavl (2021-08-20 13:55:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990244 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942315].
4004 (2021-08-23 00:27:33+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
ссылка на сайт кажется неполная
GuyToronto (2021-08-19 22:58:28+00:00): Please limit your changesets to a smaller region.
MxxCon (2021-08-20 00:29:03+00:00): @GuyToronto, file your grievances with France's government for having so many territories.
Anim Mouse (2021-08-20 04:46:10+00:00): @MxxCon Well said.
Dren ar Frankig (2021-08-20 10:47:29+00:00): I made an adjustment to the Breton translation of the french republic, France having so many over-seas territories being the reason why the region is so big
GuyToronto (2021-08-20 11:28:34+00:00): It’s not the size of the territory that is the issue. The problem is creating one massive changeset instead of smaller localized ones. Do local changes, submit the changeset, then move onto another territory.
GuyToronto (2021-08-20 11:31:07+00:00): Never mind. I now see that it's one massive relation on a global scale. I apologize.
ma-rt-in (2021-08-25 18:36:21+00:00): Hallo,
hast du mal einen Link, wo diese Verbot zu finden ist.

vg
Jess65 (2021-08-26 08:57:04+00:00): Moin, nachlesen kann man das in der Deichverordnung des jeweiligen Bundeslandes. Generell ist jegliches Benutzen verboten, Fussgänger, Fahrradfahrer  werden meistens toleriert. Ich suche noch mal, für NDS gab es mal einen Flyer. LG
ma-rt-in (2021-08-28 17:08:05+00:00): Moin,
also in besagter Verordnung steht eigentlich nix und in dem Gesetz von Niedersachsen steht zwar das die Benutzung verboten ist, aber soweit es nicht schädlich für den Deich ist es auch erlaubt ist. Daher finde ich ein pauschales Verbot für zu hart.

vg
Frans S (2021-08-19 15:04:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your contribution to this project.
An urgent request.
 Please map more accurate. Your mappings do not comply with the situation . Much oversided and not squared.


A remark.
Rectangular buildings has to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
doug_sfba (2021-11-07 11:53:05+00:00): Hi!
Could you help me understand why the protect_class for Butano State Park should be a 21 rather than a 5? This park (like most CA parks) is essentially a protected nature preserve. Recreation activities are limited to low-impact in certain areas. It conforms well to IUCN catgory V.
Viki_travel_weak (2021-12-10 10:17:27+00:00): Hi!
Seems like this area looks like more reserve than area for people's recreation, and you were right with tagging. I didn’t know exactly on the locality and therefore I used a universal class, you used an additional tag, that’s good.  Should I change class? Your tag has corrected the understanding of this territory. Thanks a lot for fixing it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109925223
Viki_travel_weak (2021-12-10 10:18:15+00:00): Regards, Viki!
doug_sfba (2021-12-13 02:09:38+00:00): Hi Viki,
Yes, personally I think protect_class for Butano and most California state and even most county parks should be 5. They are primarily protected wild lands with limited and controlled recreational access. I don't see them as "Community Life" areas (21). And I live here and hike them a lot. And most CA parks are already tagged this way.
Regards.. doug
Frans S (2021-08-19 12:55:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings

btw. Please do not change the hashtags. You removed the major descriptions
mavl (2021-08-20 13:55:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990244 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942315].
mavl (2021-08-20 13:51:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990071 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942108].
Frans S (2021-08-19 15:20:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Rectangular buildings has to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
eggie (2021-08-19 11:33:19+00:00): Dag Monkey..

Aardig gelukt als starter in OSM , maar als je goed kijkt dan zie je dat de noordelijke aansluiting net iets anders loopt . Ik heb het een beetje aangepast.
Mapse
eggie
Frans S (2021-08-19 13:22:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
BCNorwich (2021-08-22 09:00:14+00:00): Hi, you added bridge tags to all the path sections, about three-quarters of a mile, no problem I've removed those tags.

Regards Bernard.
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
Frans S (2021-08-19 13:24:15+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
mavl (2021-08-20 13:55:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990244 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942315].
Glassman (2021-08-19 17:31:53+00:00): #TIP: Look for construction that changes roads. In this case the new paved residential road no longer connects to the service road to the west. I went ahead and made the change.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109927159
kotavina (2021-10-27 05:47:58+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and making the necessary corrections. 
Apologies, for the incorrect road digitization. Going ahead, I'll ensure to check for the latest aerial imageries before making any edits.
Thanks once again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
kotavina
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
skyper (2021-08-19 13:21:59+00:00): Hi
Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109847811

#REVIEWED_BAD
krjkotam (2021-08-30 11:37:37+00:00): Hello Skyper, 
I have deleted the parking aisle which I have added wrongly. There is already a parking aisle present, which I have missed checking. Thanks for letting me know. Happy to learn from you. Please refer to the changeset (110456378). 
Regards,
krjkotam.
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
eggie (2021-08-19 11:38:04+00:00): Bij checken zag ik dat de hight_restrictor niet verbonden was met de weg..  Aangepast.
MVG
eggie
UltraNerd (2021-08-19 12:08:29+00:00): Dank voor de correctie, ik ben nog aan het leren. Hoe kan ik nu zien wat jij hebt aangepast?
Ik zie de changeset, maar volgens mij heb ik in deze changeset niets met hoogte gedaan. In een oude changeset in de buurt was dat wel zo.
eggie (2021-08-19 12:12:56+00:00): Niet in deze changeset, maar hij stond kennelijk wel op je naam.. Even zoeken. 
Hier  mijn edits..  Aan de hieigt_restrictor heb ik verder niets gedaan.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109928806

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 12:14:11+00:00): typo height_restrictor...  Ik heb 'm alleen vastgemaakt aan de weg.
UltraNerd (2021-08-19 12:24:57+00:00): Ik begrijp dat zo'n height-restrictor en de onderliggende weg aan elkaar gekoppeld horen te zijn om aan te geven bij welke weg zoiets hoort. Let ik voortaan op. Dat zal dan bijvoorbeeld voor een paaltje in de weg ook wel gelden.

Ik heb jouw link van de changeset bekeken, en gewoon de online editor, maar ik zie niet dat de weg en het object nu een relation hebben. Ik zie dat de weg iets verschoven is. 

Begrijp ik het nog niet goed, of zijn deze objecten toch nog niet verbonden zoals jij bedoelde?
eggie (2021-08-19 12:32:15+00:00): `Wanneer je goed kijkt in achavi zie je dat de rode node nog los ligt en de groen zit vast aan de weg. De weg zelf heb ik kennelijk ook verschoven. 
Je ziet dus hier twee situaties..
gr eggie
eggie (2021-08-19 12:33:44+00:00): .. en in deze changeset zie je dat ik het wandelpad heb verschoven
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109928946
rood is oud.. groen is nieuw
UltraNerd (2021-08-19 12:51:08+00:00): Ja duidelijk, ik zie nu wat je bedoelt.

Ik had verwacht een relatie tussen de weg en de restrictor te zien, maar die zie ik niet in de online editor. (Relations=0) Toch verschuift de weg nu ook als ik de restrictor sleep, dus ze zitten aan elkaar. 

Ik heb weer wat bijgeleerd, dankjewel.
eggie (2021-08-19 14:31:03+00:00): Zie ook nog een barrier=fence dwars over het pad.. Volgens mij kun je daar beter een barrier=gate van maken met access=private

Zo'n losse afrastering werkt niet in de routering. 
gr eggie
mavl (2021-08-20 13:58:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 109990371 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109942454].
canfe (2021-08-19 15:13:41+00:00): In riferimento a questo changeset ed anche ai seguenti tredici CS:

109874960
109918913
109921160
109922510 
109923164 
109923438 
109924040 
109924243 
109926044 
109926186 
109926383 
109927489 
109928109 

Faccio presente in merito ai tag:

stars NON ho ancora ricevuto risposta sul come mai viene inserito non disponibile come da mio precedente commento.
phone spesso non sono formattati correttamente
phone_2 è deprecato va unito con phone
Contact facebook spesso non corrisponde ad una pagina del dominio in oggetto
contact instagram spesso non corrisponde ad una pagina del dominio in oggetto
contact:tripadvisor spesso non corrisponde ad una pagina del dominio in oggetto
addr:place praticamente in quasi tutti i CS viene inserito il valore Capoluogo che verosimilmente non è un place
website spesso corrisponde invece ad un URL
operator	Mette Persona fisica non è corretto

Per tutte queste ragioni (ma sicuramente vista la mole me ne sarà sfuggita qualcuna) chiedo di interrompere la mappatura finché non si padroneggia meglio il significato dei tag citati.