piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LidaCity (2017-09-15 08:13:31+00:00): вандал!
Jay May (2017-09-15 08:30:01+00:00): ?
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:21:57+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
axelr (2017-09-21 20:32:13+00:00): Die Haltestelle ist laut Flyer nicht dort. Siehe http://www.wupsi.de/ihre-wupsi/aktuelles/einzelansicht/archive/2017/april/article/umbau-busbahnhof-wiesdorf.html. Würdes du bitte mal deine Quelle offen legen.
RicoElectrico (2017-10-27 18:56:01+00:00): Cześć. Przypominam, że oprócz nazwy ulicy trzeba zmienić ulicę w adresach. Poprawiam to.

Posty na forum: 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=389016#p389016

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=658213#p658213
Marek-M (2017-10-27 19:32:40+00:00): Dzięki za informację. Po zmianie ulicy zastanawiałem się co zrobić z adresami i budynkami przypisanymi do danej ulicy. Teraz będę wiedział jak to zrobić, żeby się nie narobić. Pozdrawiam.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 07:14:35+00:00): Hello cybeer77. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524638354 you have tagged `manmade` instead of `man_made`, right? ;-) #newkey #typo
Chuangcg (2017-09-30 01:17:10+00:00): My English level is poor, the following text is translated with google: Why do you large-scale change Pingdingshan map? Have you ever been to Pingdingshan? Do you know the road? Because of your changes, there have been a lot of mistakes, I had a one of the changes!
我英语水平较差，以下文字是用google翻译的：你为什么大规模的修改平顶山的地图？你来过平顶山吗？知道道路情况吗？因为你的修改，出现了大量的错误，我不得不一项一项的修改！
user_5359 (2017-09-14 14:16:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think the atm exists in the water.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 06:43:22+00:00): Hello minseo. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524642781 you have tagged `constrcution=..`. I think it should be `construction`, right? #newkey #typo
Joe E (2017-12-27 19:50:19+00:00): This does not appear to be a valid edit.  Please revert or correct.
SafwatHalaby (2017-09-16 07:15:51+00:00): Please note the conventions for Israeli roads: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Israel#Inter-city_Roads

(I have not checked if this breaks any conventions. Just thought I'd point this out).
murble (2018-04-08 21:08:19+00:00): Hi there, I just walked over here,
what source did you use for instance for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524643648 ? It doesn't seem to exist on the ground, and is very unlikely to have even 7 months ago.
Glucosamine (2018-04-23 13:25:29+00:00): There is a feature on the aerial, but I may have mistaken a ditch for a wall. If you have more up to date survey data then please do make the change.
eggie (2017-09-14 13:33:19+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-14 13:37:14+00:00): Wanneer een weg een andere kruis dien je altijd een verbindingsnode te maken. In dit geval kunnen fietsers niet vanaf de rotonde de afslag naar de nieuwe weg nemen. Ik pas het even aan.
Maak je zelf de nodeverbinding? Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-09-14 15:39:26+00:00): .. kruis.. zonder  -t-  grrr. De weg kruist het fietspad zonder node. Ik pas het even zelf aan. ... dan klopt de kaart weer. Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
giggls (2017-09-17 08:46:43+00:00): Hallo,

ich halte den backcountry tag an diesem Platz für falsch. Das teil ist ja sogar für Womo freigegeben:
http://www.ostsee-zeitung.de/Region-Rostock/Ribnitz-Damgarten/Campen-und-Baden-am-Eixener-See

Vermutlich wäre camp_site=basic richtig.
locke (2017-09-17 15:53:27+00:00): Hallo,
ja, da hast du Recht. Das tag kannte ich bisher nicht. Habe es geändert.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 07:39:14+00:00): Hello Wüstenrose. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524648912 you have introduced the new key `tune`. What is it for? Should it be a culvert? #newkey
Wüstenrose (2017-09-16 11:27:44+00:00): Hi Harald, 
it was just a mistake... i wouldn't like to introcduce a new key! I'll fix it.
axelr (2017-09-21 11:19:25+00:00): Warst du vor Ort ? Nach Luftbild kann die stop_position Wilmersdorfer Straße nicht stimmen.
joost schouppe (2017-10-02 10:38:12+00:00): Ziet er goed uit! Bedankt.
maxerickson (2018-04-18 21:07:09+00:00): Hi, there's a specific tag for an ambulance station, emergency=ambulance_station.

I've gone ahead and retagged the station you marked as amenity=hospital here.


Max
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-14 15:08:51+00:00): Hello genes tairo. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524652355 i think you can delete `biuilding=yes` ;-) #newkey #typo
Thomas8122 (2017-09-14 16:25:34+00:00): Hallo Avang3r, soll das der Name des Parks sein? Ich denke nicht, oder?!
Gruß Thomas
chillly (2017-09-16 14:15:43+00:00): This looks like a mechanical edit. Where was this discussed?

Undiscussed mechanical edits destroys confidence from other mappers. This should be reverted and discussed fully.
ForstEK (2017-09-16 16:52:31+00:00): Hi!
how you can view here I correct outdated tag "type=gas" to 
"substance=gas" according wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline (here describes that tag 'type' uses only for multipolygons). http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Oil_and_Gas_Infrastructure
Владимир К (2017-09-16 17:25:47+00:00): This was discussed on telegram channel :)
Hjart (2017-09-14 14:07:15+00:00): Bemærk at det fremgår af selve changesettet (se ovenfor her) at du har brugt SDFE luftfoto og at du derfor ikke behøver eplicit angive det på de enkelte objekter.
Hylle (2017-09-14 17:36:23+00:00): Troede bare det var god stil at lægge det på det enkelte objekt også. Bruger faktisk et plugin til JOSM til at tegne bygningerne, og den har haft source som en del af tag skabelonen. Men jeg skal da gerne lade være. :)
Hjart (2017-09-14 19:25:42+00:00): Det var det tidligere, men efter at JOSM & iD begyndte at angive source på changesettet er det i dem blevet overflødigt at angive hvilket luftfoto på de enkelte objekter  (jeg har ikke endnu ikke set det angivet i changesets lavet med Potlatch).
Er der enkelte/særlige objekter i et changeset, som man personligt kender til eller har ændret på basis af f.eks. Mapillary kan det dog stadig være hensigtsmæssigt at angive source på objektet.
Bemærk at jeg har set rigtig mange tilfælde hvor senere redigeringer på basis af nyere/andre kilder ikke har medført at source er blevet korrekt opdateret (på grund af uerfarne/for travle mappere) og at der derfor hænger en masse source tags rundt omkring som i praksis er forældede og bare tager plads op nu.
eggie (2017-09-14 15:54:37+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-14 15:57:42+00:00): Let op dat je geen wegen plakt aan de landuse. Dit geeft problemen bij verschuiving, Ik maak het even los.
eggie (2017-09-14 16:05:08+00:00): Track losgemaakt van landuse. access = private toegevoegd.
Duplicate way verwijderd van weth Boerkampweg.
Alle begin is moeilijk. Zoem voldoende in om te kijken of de weg maar op één punt vast zit aan de andere weg en niet een stukje samen oplopen. Dat routeert niet goed. Succes met mappen in Tanzania.
eggie (2017-09-14 16:07:30+00:00): Dit was je changeset http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52037941
LouisaDWD (2017-09-15 09:05:03+00:00): Dankjewe, ik zal er op letten
Hjart (2017-09-14 14:13:28+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig at simplificere lidt og ændre svingbegrænsninger så de er mere gennemskuelige
Fod (2017-09-14 14:43:33+00:00): Det ser fint ud. Begrænsingen "only_straiht_on" er selvfølgelig den helt rigtige at bruge her!
Hjart (2017-09-14 14:51:43+00:00): Jo flere små stumper vej der er, jo sværere er det at gennemskue systemet, så derfor samlede jeg en række af de stykker du splittede.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 06:53:25+00:00): Hello cricket81. I think the first version of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524662517 was better. Now it really doesn't make sense: building:level without building but surface?! And all the descriptions have a smell of (unwanted) SEO. #newkey
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 06:08:27+00:00): Hello Глеб. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524664891 you have tagged `.=service` along to `highway=service`. I think the first one is  	unnecessary? #newkey
Глеб (2017-09-15 06:19:41+00:00): I'm sorry, my inattention
Polarbear (2017-09-15 22:30:08+00:00): natural=sand für die Sandfläche ist gut. 
Wenn das der Buddelkasten eines Spielplatzes ist, kannst du gern auch 
playground=sandpit
hinzufügen :-)
Danke.
Constable (2017-09-15 06:28:16+00:00): Ciao, grazie per aver aggiunto la palestra, per favore però spostala sopra all'edificio che la ospita; adesso risulta su una strada di accesso.
Grazie per la collaborazione, se noti che a Rosate manca altro, aggiungi pure, se hai dubbi chiedi pure.
Ciao
Ashilex_ (2017-09-15 08:46:51+00:00): Ciao, perdonatemi ma credevo di dover posizionare il nodo sul punto che corrisponde all'entrata della palestra stessa.
E' meglio se utilizzo la fiunzione area?
Constable (2017-09-15 08:57:28+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la risposta immediata. Nessun problema, è un errore correggibile in 2 secondi. No, non usare l'area, sposta solo il nodo del Fit'Art sopra all'edificio qua a fianco.
L'area puoi usarla se aggiungi un'attività che occupa il 100% di un edificio, a quel punto aggiungi l'area con i tag building=* e i tag specifici dell'attività (esempio http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473981614)
Nel tuo caso, se il capannone qua a fianco contiene tante attività ci sono due possibilità: si divide il capannone in N parti e ad ognuna si assegnano anche i tag dell'attività svolta al suo interno, oppure si lascia così l'edificio e ci si mettono sopra vari punti in corrispondenza delle attività svolte all'interno (esempio http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303204965)
ianlopez1115 (2017-09-14 14:18:03+00:00): offset used is -0.60; -4.78
topolusitania (2017-09-14 18:09:36+00:00): Are these roads really living streets ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
Tomas Straupis (2017-09-15 09:45:02+00:00): Nuėmus nuo valstybinių įstaigų pasenusį amenity=public_building reikia uždėti (kur tinka) office=government, nes tiesiog building=public yra paprastas pastatas, niekaip neišsiskiriantis iš kitų building. Ir tada tarkim Šiaulių SoDra „dingsta“ iš lankytinų vietų.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 06:09:58+00:00): Hello RoadWarrier. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5105462048 you have tagged `addr"state=...`. I think it should be `addr:state`, right? #newkey #typo
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-14 15:36:57+00:00): Hello chaemassey. Please review your changeset, because you have used the misspelled key `sidewak` ;-) #newkey #typo
Warin61 (2017-09-19 02:26:42+00:00): node 5105512962 - has tag 'ip=ip66' .. what doe that mean? Is it a reference?
samuelrussell (2017-09-19 02:43:14+00:00): Ingress protection, an international standard, https://www.mpl.ch/info/IPratings.html
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 06:32:21+00:00): See discussion for amphi at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52023526
eggie (2017-09-15 07:47:28+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 07:04:23+00:00): Hello cafecho. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524633845 there's `heigh` instead of `height`, right? ;-)
Juan Manuel Dócile (2019-11-17 01:54:38+00:00): Como estas? De acuerdo a la documentación, no se permite establecer el height como lo estableciste. Podrías corregirlo por favor? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height?uselang=es-AR
5m4u9 (2017-09-15 01:09:12+00:00): sólo señalar que para bolivia acordamos añadir las jardines que no tienen flores como cesped, seguimos el consenso mundial
Caleidoscopic (2017-09-15 20:01:38+00:00): ¿De qué elemento específico hablamos? sólo veo el cuadro completo del changeset, gracias
5m4u9 (2017-09-16 05:33:08+00:00): ayyy lo siento, me olvidé añadir el elemento. son unas tipo jardineras a un lado de la avenida jp ii

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524689678
Caleidoscopic (2017-09-16 13:05:59+00:00): No son jardineras es espacio circulable con asientos y senderos por eso lo puse como Plaza, no dibujé aún las áreas que me describes como césped, o detalles como aceras, pero lo marqué como plaza porque no es un camellón o divisor de vías solamente somo en la avenida, creo que hay fotos mapillary que respaldan.
5m4u9 (2017-09-16 17:50:45+00:00): interesante, nunca ví una tan delgada. es un buen ejemplo.
Caleidoscopic (2017-09-18 16:50:13+00:00): A lo mejor me está fallando el redibujo del área y por eso parece más angosta de lo que es en realidad, veré de corregirlo e incluir el área césped y el mobiiario, muchas gracias.
Caleidoscopic (2017-09-18 16:53:35+00:00): Igual si existe una categoría paseo tal vez es más apropiada, gracias por las observaciones.
Caleidoscopic (2017-09-18 16:54:31+00:00): es como el espacio circulable de la Av, Busch no sé si eso sirve de referencia para encontrar otra categoría más apropiada.
5m4u9 (2017-09-18 17:25:11+00:00): el mapa surgió en londres, ahi se empezó a esbozar categorias como leisure y landuse. leisure más como tiempo de espacimiento, landuse como fisicamente como esta usado el espacio

park y garden estan bien definidos, grass debería ser cesped sin catalogación... lo más básico si una no sabe como catalogar... luego esta recreation_ground, village_green, common... todos bien catacteristicos de pueblos de la isla. en bolivia estos ultimos creo no tenemos, por nuestra concepción de propiedad privada-publica dual y no gris

tenemos muchas veces discusiones sobre si el diseño o la función es quien define algo. para bolivia yo vi que la función define algo (generalmente)
Caleidoscopic (2017-09-18 17:37:00+00:00): Se usa como paseo y es totalmente circulable y disfrutable, las personas usan el sitio como plaza/parque,  entonces queda como plaza! muchas gracias. iré apara mapillar y marcar con detalle asientos y otro mobiliario, muchas gracias por el seguimiento.
Aleks-Berlin (2017-09-18 14:36:39+00:00): Hi transilien-mapmagare, you destroyed 4 shops here. "shop"=<empty> is invalid. Either the shop is removed/closed, or it is there, but not having an empty shop-tag. Please fix this. I changed it to shop=fixme. Thanks, Alex
colgza (2017-09-14 16:12:34+00:00): *building
praeteritum (2023-12-12 11:21:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145033572.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 07:46:28+00:00): Hallo hsimpson. Bei http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144599467 ist dir in der Breite wohl ein `t` flöten gegangen, oder? ;-) #newkey #typo
hsimpson (2017-09-15 07:50:33+00:00): Tatsache! ;)
Danke für die Anmerkung!
Grüße
GerdP (2017-09-15 05:31:08+00:00): Hi!
Please review https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174901199
I assume you meant service here. I did not correct it because there is also a barrier=gate which is unclear. If you know this place please place the barrier node so that it is not a junction of two different highway ways. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate
SHARCRASH (2017-09-15 12:39:12+00:00): Hello! Yep, i ment service. Thanks you! This area is filled with elements having an offset, wrong tags, etc. I wanted to correct as much as possible before leaving for an appointment. ;)
Verdy_p (2017-09-15 13:01:36+00:00): Tu t'es complètement trompé en prenant l'imagerie Bing et non les images hautes résolution qui montrent clairement qu'il y a bien des murs et non des chemins, et même des portes !
Tomas Straupis (2017-09-15 05:27:31+00:00): Jei adresas nėra žinomas, nereikia dėti addr:city. Jei vieną kartą po to atsirado pilnas adresas, nereiškia, kad taip bus ir kitą kartą :-) Standartinė procedūra yra addr:city žymą trinti, o ne pridėti kitas adreso žymas ;-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-03 12:42:39+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2483652
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2483654
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2483655

BTW, thanks for https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/56.54675/3.21707&layers=N - I was unaware that something like that existed.
mikkolukas (2017-09-17 23:28:42+00:00): Vil du venligst lade være med at lave rettelser som du ikke har styr på.

Du har uden at tjekke op på de faktisk forhold "rettet" krydset mellem Løgstørvej og den nye Aars Ringvej fra korrekt til forkert.

Jeg kører forbi der hver eneste dag og vej nøjagtigt hvordan vejene hænger sammen. Satellit-billederne fra foråret 2016 viser ikke længere korrekt.
mikkolukas (2017-09-17 23:33:15+00:00): ... ISÆR når der i taggingen er angivet en check_date
Hjart (2017-09-18 07:43:53+00:00): Jeg er fuldstændig enig i at det er vigtigt at være opmærksom på tilstedeværelsen af tags som disse og desuden når jeg støder på veje mm som ikke stemmer med de luftfotos jeg kigger på tjekker jeg ALTID historikken for at se hvorvidt de er lavet før eller efter de her luftfotos er taget + hvad de er lavet efter. Dette er vigtigt, især for folk der som os er mere end almindeligt aktive.
naoliv (2017-09-15 14:59:27+00:00): Paulo, essa rua https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289073191 "R. Prudente de Morães" no mapa da prefeitura está com "Morães" desse jeito mesmo?
Essa avenida https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289024910 está com "Contôrno" mesmo?
Os nomes estão iguais ao Google.
Onde você encontrou o mapa da prefeitura?
smaprs (2017-09-15 18:51:38+00:00): Paulo, algumas normas do OSM:

"Cada contribuição para o OpenStreetMap deve ser:
...
Legal - significa que você não pode copiar dados que sejam protegidos por direitos autorais.  
...  
Não faça importação de dados de terceiros ao OSM sem primeiramente apresentá-los, discuti-los e ter a concordância da comunidade OSM...
..."  
  
Veja em:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:How_We_Map  
  
Você está trazendo dados da prefeitura.  
Você precisa indicar o link ou cópia do mapa fonte da prefeitura, para garantir os seus dados.  
O que está no OSM precisa ser "verificável".
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 07:45:21+00:00): Hello AndersAndersson. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5105730519 you have tagged `vehicke` instead of `vehicle`, right? #newkey #typo
AndersAndersson (2017-09-15 10:36:53+00:00): Yes, a misstake. I've fixed the problem. Thanks for pointing it out.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 07:03:33+00:00): Hello cafecho. Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63689208 really a building or a building:part. There you tagged `heig` instead of `height`, right? #newkey #typo
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 06:56:05+00:00): Hello Supaplex. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4524319690 you have tagged `diused:amenity`. I think you have turn around the u and s ;-) #newkey #typo
freebeer (2017-09-15 11:47:40+00:00): What, `disued:amenity' #newkeyagain #hashtagsRdumb ?  ;-P~
This cntributin has nt any err0rs
Supaplex (2017-09-15 11:50:38+00:00): fix in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52066588
freebeer (2017-09-15 12:04:22+00:00): `diᴝ∾ed:amenity' works for me too ;-)
(perhaps better to say, switched/swapped in the original comment)
#notanothernewkey #aarghmakeitstop
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 12:11:44+00:00): @freebeer: thx for the hint (switched/swapped), but there are a lot of new keys left (circa 40 per day) :-p
eggie (2018-05-25 17:31:28+00:00): alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
wambacher (2017-09-15 10:53:49+00:00): Hi Didier, i know that you are a experenced mapper, but last day you did a lot of errors in DOM.

you "killed" 18 (eighteen!!) AL4-Boundaries in DOM by changing them without care.

see list: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1021-countries-compare-2017-09-15

all 18 Missings or Area Changes of DOM are result of your work.

detail: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3421245

remember the old rule: before editing a boundary, take care about the other members of other relations.

walter/Germany
didier2020 (2017-09-15 12:10:01+00:00): Hi, thanks for your message.  Work is in progress. All will be ok in a few day.
Saikat Maiti (2017-09-14 20:06:19+00:00): Please read carefully the mapping instruction. Please download the data first before you map and check carefully what is mapped! You did a complete mess over here. Please take care for further.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 07:16:31+00:00): Hallo _torsten_. In http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7575255 sollte es bestimmt ein `mtb:scale` anstelle von `mtb.scale` werden, oder? ;-) #newkey #typo
_torsten_ (2017-09-15 09:54:42+00:00): Hallo Harald, natürlich! :-)
Danke für den Hinweis.
LKS90 (2017-09-16 19:57:24+00:00): The node has been moved somewhere to Bhf. Stadelhofen, that's kind of weird.
datendelphin (2017-09-17 11:48:49+00:00): Also Zollikerstrasse: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1811869948
does look like an error
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 06:39:23+00:00): Hello StenSoft. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25535780 you tagged `brdge:ref=...`. I think you missed an `i`, right? #newkey #typo
NyanSten (2017-09-15 09:13:35+00:00): Hello, you are right. I have fixed it. Thank you.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 06:41:01+00:00): Hello jnsp. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524729801 you have tagged `bulding:part=...`. I think you missed an `i`, right? And is `area=yes` necessary? #newkey #typo
jnsp (2017-09-15 06:44:06+00:00): Thank you, I fixed the typo. I'm not sure if area=yes is necessary as the wiki is not clear on this regarding 3D mapping.
jnsp (2017-09-15 06:51:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings#Building_parts says "[...]usually modeled by drawing an area within the building[...]" in the first sentence. But later on it talks about building:part ways. Do you know if I should use lines or an area?
eggie (2017-09-15 05:30:51+00:00): Graag concreet commentaar wat je edits inhouden. Algemene wijzigingen is te vaag.
eggie (2017-09-15 05:35:10+00:00): Wanneer je building=yes verwijderd zie je het gebouw niet meer als "gebouw". 
Beter is het om building yes te laten staan en een vlak op het hele schoolterrein te zetten met de tag amenity=school. daar zet je dan ook de naam op.
Je kunt amenity school ook evt. aan de adresnode toevoegen.
Verander je het zelf? Graag reactie.
Dit waren je edits: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52047524
daandingemans (2017-09-16 15:14:27+00:00): Bedankt voor het advies, ben nog vrij nieuw hier. Heb het gefixt
eggie (2017-09-16 15:27:55+00:00): Mooi.. schroom niet om zaken te vragen. dat kan ook op het forum. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
mapse!
Beddhist (2018-10-26 15:40:17+00:00): Way 524733021: this is an unpaved driveway and you have drawn it right through a building. (corrected)

All your roads are offset 5-6m.
SteveP2000 (2017-09-14 18:41:42+00:00): @Peterholland146. Nice buildings :)
Thanks for mapping!
Constable (2017-09-15 06:45:26+00:00): Hi there, what do you mean with that "P3"? Other than that, this restaurant has already a name=La Calcheira tag, it looks useless to me adding a name:it tag, given that it is located in Italy and then its name is obviously Italian.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4248120066
Thanks for your help
Cheers
Constable (2017-10-01 14:38:41+00:00): Given that you didn't answer my question, I did remove the "P3" value from the name:it tag
opendcc (2017-09-14 20:17:52+00:00): Interessant. Erster Edit - mit JOSM und dann mal 567 Linien und 2304 Knoten quer über Süddeutschland und Österreich.

Es wäre nett, zum einem die Changesets kleiner und lokaler zu halten und zum anderen eine Quelle anzugeben.

Vielen Dank!
PT-53 (2017-09-15 08:01:15+00:00): Hallo Engener,
bitte erkläre uns mal, was Du hier alles gemacht hast.
Grüße
opendcc (2017-09-15 16:44:45+00:00): Ich habe den Changeset mal versuchsweise separat geladen: es sind ein paar touristische Sachen, u.a. bei Füssen, Chiemsee Arlberg, dann Details aus Engen in BW. Insgesamt scheint es i.O, zu sein.
EinEngener (2017-09-18 16:45:43+00:00): Ich war im allgäu im urlaub und hab viele sachen dort hinzugefügt. In Engen detailgetreuer da ich dort herkomme