piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Stalfur (2017-08-11 10:41:17+00:00): Thanks for these edits Cafen!
It appears the junction has been opened today - are you able to update this?
Łukasz Dudek (2017-06-24 23:36:08+00:00): Sorry, incorrect changeset message. Should be 
"Changed English name - removed (state) suffix, to align it with names in other languages
karitotp (2017-06-26 16:59:51+00:00): hi, you added arabic name to the previous names like this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4230919498), you should add these name in a new tag like name:* according the idiom. Could you please take a look again on these place? Thank you
سامبا (2017-06-27 03:16:49+00:00): In the case of Eritrea I will also add futurely English and Italian nameplates. Thanks for your info.
SomeoneElse (2017-06-25 01:47:04+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Can you explain a little bit what you mean by "Correcting international waters for Ceuta and Melilla"?  As you're no doubt aware it's a sensitive issue, and all sides of the discussion will want to understand what's happened here, including changes to names, geometry, notes on some of the items etc.
A little bit of explanation now might help to prevent problems further on.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
arm87 (2017-06-25 08:14:10+00:00): Hello Andy, thanks for the welcoming!

I meant to say "territorial waters" (12nm). The lines for the maritime boundaries of Ceuta and Melilla were there already, but overwritten in a way that they seem internal Moroccan waters and mentioning a conflict that really doesn't exist. This is not a sensitive issue, like it is further south with Western Sahara/Morocco or with Gibraltar (I am not touching anything there): these boundaries are internationally recognized as per UNCLOS. This site: http://www.gibnet.com/fish/waters.htm shows the Gibraltar point of view on it, which seems quite neutral and clearly shows Ceuta's waters (same applies for Melilla). Previous lines on OSM were from EUROSION dataset as per comments/notes, but I have no means to open this data (https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/maritime-boundaries#tab-gis-data).
Best regards
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-06-26 02:48:37+00:00): Hi khuc tinh ca, I would like to inform you if you might be wanna check the newest imagery (premium beta maxar) around this way so you can make small update to your edits around there. thank you
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319285497
keithonearth (2017-06-25 00:51:15+00:00): Pretending that sidewalks that allow use by cyclists are bike ways does not help cyclists, it just obfuscates the reality of the infrastructure. Also footways are visible on most (all?) renderings, but if they didn't that'd be no reason to use inaccurate tags, as we do not want to tag things for how they will be rendered. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
KKS (2017-10-27 17:36:06+00:00): Шо там Трускавецьку ще не добудували?
Тут гаражі відрізані від світу http://pavlo-dudka.github.io/osm-pg-tests/test.html?map?highway.islands.service#zoom=15&lat=49.8014&lon=23.99143
VARVAR8 (2017-10-28 18:53:49+00:00): Зараз не знаю. Був там десь місяць тому. Там болото і ями по коліна... Десь маю фото.
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-25 15:11:23+00:00): What does a "ref" mean for a traffic signal?
dsh4 (2017-06-25 22:45:31+00:00): On the pole of the stoplight, there is a sign that shows a number and (in most cities) also the names of the cross streets.  The ref is that number.
Hrs_365 (2017-08-16 05:11:59+00:00): Добрый день!
У меня к вам просьба - будьте внимательны в правках маршрутов. Вы нарушаете порядок сегментов.
bhousel (2017-06-25 02:24:00+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
user_5359 (2017-06-25 04:38:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert you changeset because Google map isn’t an alowed source!
user_5359 (2017-06-25 04:35:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You paint an additional line crossing a railway without any tags. What did you mean by that?

If you need help: You are welcome!
treestryder (2017-06-30 21:55:42+00:00): I know that area well and that line does not make sense. I'll remove it for now.

hfly hh, if you would like help with this, let me know.

Removal changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49954816
rarad74 (2017-06-25 07:39:01+00:00): Hello. Probably the name is with diacritics Șincai??
indigomc (2017-12-25 08:37:17+00:00): There are 6 'stop areas' here next to each other. It renders badly. Should it not be one bus station?
Vonter (2017-12-25 10:16:30+00:00): I had made 6 separate nodes as there are 6 separate bench+shelter locations for this station. If there is any way to preserve the 6 platforms without having rendering problems, that would work.
I have removed the highway=bus_stop tags now, so that may fix it.
indigomc (2017-12-25 17:38:55+00:00): Thanks. I think it was the names that I noticed, multiple instances of the same name next to each other. And I appear to have made my comment on the changeset without making the location clear, sorry if you had trouble working out what I was referring to.
kaltuna (2018-04-17 10:00:15+00:00): Hallo, es gibt eine Nachfrage. Vielleicht kannst Du etwas dazu beitragen ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1358791
gileri (2017-06-25 16:29:45+00:00): Bonjour,

Le access=destination n'est pas nécessaire puisque dans tout les cas les usagers finiraient sur une voie bus/vélo uniquement s'ils continuent.
gileri (2017-06-25 16:35:52+00:00): J'ai retiré le tag.
xrt (2017-06-26 14:57:48+00:00): Boujour, je ne connais pas access=destination donc sauf erreur je ne le modifie pas. j'utilise iD en français et il modifie en anglais... Ce que je voulais c'est que 80m d'absence de bandes cyclables se voit sur Géovélo  https://www.geovelo.fr/reports/map-errors?bbox=4.860483258962632,45.77388691506151,4.8622964322566995,45.77479893172557   Il faut attendre au moins une semaine je pense
BCNorwich (2017-07-01 07:46:05+00:00): Hello There and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've amended your house and garden additions to better tie in with the way that these items are usually mapped/tagged. 
Regards Bernard
TRUDGILL (2017-07-01 11:13:19+00:00): Thank you Bernard.
Hjart (2017-06-25 07:55:14+00:00): Dette var en dublet af en allerede eksisterende POI: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/496958671 (som muligvis ikke er med Maps.me endnu). Derfor har jeg slettet den.
BCNorwich (2017-07-01 07:54:06+00:00): Removed duplicated way.
Владимир К (2017-06-26 07:30:53+00:00): А зачем вы удалили свою же точку https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4616592717 ? она не лишняя
pbUJb (2017-06-26 07:57:17+00:00): Восстановлю.
phey (2017-09-09 12:57:15+00:00): Valencia Ladies Salon LLC......tel# 0097165690333; mob# 00971503636379;  00971508703162
5m4u9 (2018-07-14 01:27:34+00:00): already exists 'salar de uyuni' https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1769713
Richard (2017-08-12 12:40:28+00:00): Hi - great to see the work you've been doing. Please don't remove tiger:reviewed from a road unless you've also verified the road surface - a 'reviewed' residential road would usually be assumed paved unless otherwise tagged. Thanks!
eggie (2017-06-25 12:34:44+00:00): Dag Gebsss, Het is een ramp voor de volgende editor om zaken te verbeteren wanneer je landuse gaat plakken aan wegen. Dan krijg je bij verschuivingen vanzelf fouten. Ook als en weg een andere weg kruist zul je een verbindingsnode moeten maken. Ik maak de landuse even los van de wegen. De verbindingsnode ontbreekt op het stukje Nieuwe Steeg met dat voetpad.
eggie (2017-06-25 12:36:12+00:00): In het begin volgen wij de edits van startende mappers. ...ook om te helpen.
Graag reactie zodat wij zien dat zaken die wij aandragen overkomen.
eggie (2017-06-25 12:54:42+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49808271

De node heb ik al aangebracht. Vlakken voor voetgangers worden meestal met pedestrian getagd. 
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
eggie (2017-06-25 19:34:35+00:00): De landuse grass aan de Meerenburg heb ik ook losgekoppeld van de wegen. 
Graag reactie...
Gebsss (2017-06-29 06:33:35+00:00): Bedankt voor je opmerkingen eggie. Het niet koppelen van landuse aan wegen snap ik. Ik zal er in het vervolg rekening mee houden. Ik neem aan dat je wel landuses aan elkaar mag koppelen. Kan ik ergens meer informatie vinden over wat wel en niet aan elkaar mag worden gekoppeld ?
eggie (2017-06-29 07:23:07+00:00): Veel info vind je op het forum. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Voorstellen kun je jezelf evt. onder het draadje welkom.
De landuse is import van uit het kadaster. Wanneer iets is veranderd kun je het aanpassen. Tussen bospercelen ligt vaak ruimte soms zijn het paden... soms niet meer. Ik ben geen voorstander van het plakken van de 3dshapes. De historie van de kavels gaat zo verloren.
Zelfgetekende landuse kun je aan elkaar plakken. forest, grass...en natural=water e.d.
Wat altijd helemaal los ligt zijn  landuse=residential, Industrial, leisure=park  Dat zijn allemaal losse overkoepelingen.
Vanuit de import in 2007 van AND  .. de basis van het wegennet liggen de wegen nog altijd niet op de landuse. 
Het grass ligt aan weerszijde. Nieuwe wegen worden soms over de landuse heengelegd. Dat mag. 
Bij twijfel gewoon vragen.
eggie (2017-06-29 07:26:29+00:00): Tip: uiterste voorzichtigheid bij edits langs de Waal. Dat zijn allemaal multipolygonen. Wanneer je die onderbreekt staat de rivier leeg. 
ook water tekenen is een verhaal apart en niet direct voor starters. 
Mapse.. en gewoon vragen stellen.. ook op het forum.
eggie (2017-06-29 07:31:24+00:00): Langs dat stukje Waaldijk ten zuidwesten van Herwijnen ontbreekt bv de landuse=residential. Die zou je de Waaldijk volgend helemaal los overheen kunnen aanbrengen.
kreuzschnabel (2018-06-16 19:32:31+00:00): Hallo, bitte lies mal unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=alpine%20hut?uselang=de nach, was wir in OSM unter einer Berghütte verstehen. Ist das wirklich weit und breit die einzige Unterkunft für Wander in ansonsten lebensfeindlicher Umgebung?
TourenbikerFKB (2018-06-16 20:43:28+00:00): das dürfte eher das übliche "Sportlerheim" sein, in dem sich die Fußballer vor dem Spiel umziehen und evt. das ein oder andere Getränk zu sich nehmen. Mit etwas Glück gibt es an einem Spieltag auch mal 'ne Bratwurst :-)
Supaplex (2017-06-26 14:55:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4642434689
duplicated
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:43:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
user_5359 (2017-06-25 15:29:15+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM. Dein Eintrag ist eine Dublette zu dem Eintrag https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/265758129
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:43:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2017-08-29 00:51:39+00:00): Jeg har vendt retningen på http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503172077
Dalkvist (2017-06-27 10:28:46+00:00): Hi nice to see more people helping to make the map better. 
The name tag is only used for the name of things, there is no need to duplicate other tags there. 
There are several sub tags to shelters[1] we use to give more information feel free to add some if you like.

[1]https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type
Alexander Yanev (2017-06-27 20:54:52+00:00): Hi, tank's for link! This is "no name" shelters. :-)
letihu (2017-07-11 11:29:16+00:00): Warum bleiben denn an den Gebäudeecken leere nodes zurück?
Z. B. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4935148565/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4935148568/history#map=19/51.48571/7.55671
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4935148562/history
und noch 100 weitere Punkte
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:43:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
Hjart (2017-06-25 10:12:20+00:00): Bemærk at Maps.me i tilfælde som dette ikke er specielt effektiv.
eggie (2017-06-25 12:14:51+00:00): Lijkt me prima zo. Die restaurantjes aan de noordzijde van de Saroleastraat zouden ook nog op hun adresnode kunnen staan.
Ropino (2018-12-27 18:31:09+00:00): Hi,
Kannst du bitte erklären, was das für Objekte sind die nur einen 'Namen' haben wie z.B. '12/245', '12/244' oder '12/243'?
Einer davon hat auch noch addr:city=mühleserberg.
sdos77 (2018-12-27 18:45:06+00:00): Hallo, 
das sind Flurstückbezeichnungen. 
addr:city ist aber falsch, das Feld muss in Potlatch anders bezeichnet gewesen sein.
Grüße
aldobelus (2017-11-11 15:31:16+00:00): Hola Emilio. Soy Armando, de Sí Se Puede Laredo, de Comunicación. Me interesa mucho el software libre y me ha llamado la atención que hayas hecho cambios. ¿Vives en Laredo? ¿Sueles añadir cosas en OSM? Me gustaría encontrar a alguien que tenga interés por estas cosas...
Hjart (2017-06-25 10:16:09+00:00): Bemærk at du her har lavet hul i en ruterelation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2757633. Ved du hvordan Pilgrimsruten ser ud nu?
Hjart (2017-06-25 10:17:35+00:00): Bemærk også den fixme der er på det stykke sti du klippede: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190597458/history
hyggemap (2017-06-25 14:26:05+00:00): I was at the location when I made the edits, and there is no crossing where the path was showing. There is no tunnel or bridge. I fixed the geometry to be correct. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49815277 I corrected relation and removed fixme. Thanks.
AsgerFrank (2017-06-25 15:58:21+00:00): When possible, detailing bicycle track/lane/.. is preferable, rather than bicycle=yes only. 
I've grabbed the opportunity and have added tracks and lanes, utilizing Mapillary along Næsbyvej.
hyggemap (2017-06-25 16:24:33+00:00): Thank you for the advice, AsgarFrank! I will be more detailed in my future edits.
Hjart (2017-06-25 19:57:11+00:00): Judging from your username I assumed you would speak danish. Am I mistaken?
hyggemap (2017-06-26 08:16:29+00:00): I prefer to type in English.
tbm (2017-06-25 21:04:56+00:00): This looks like an incorrect edit. Can you please double check?
tbm (2017-06-30 10:00:26+00:00): Removed.
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:43:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:43:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
eggie (2017-06-25 13:26:46+00:00): In Nederland is het door alle details en mogelijkheden best lastig mappen. Zo hebben we afgesproken om gebouwen te importeren. Wanneer voor en schuur een bouwvergunning is afgegeven kunnen we het importeren uit de BAG (overheid) Je doet dan op het forum een verzoek onder het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
De BAG-geraars importeren het in n0-time. Wanneer geen bouwvergunning is afgegeven dan zul je het zelf moeten intekenene.
Check hier of het in de BAG bestaat.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=160000&geometry.y=455000&zoomlevel=3
eggie (2017-06-25 13:27:55+00:00): Een voordeel is dat alle gegevens bouwjaar, functie, e.d. in de data komen.
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:43:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:43:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
kubahahaha (2021-11-03 11:03:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4935259224
Co to za sklep? Zwykłę Doido (convinience) czy komputerowy?
tbm (2017-06-25 21:05:00+00:00): This looks like an incorrect edit. Can you please double check?
tbm (2017-06-30 10:00:33+00:00): Removed.
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
RicoElectrico (2017-06-25 19:50:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4935282522

Proszę o uważne sprawdzanie typu, urząd miasta to nie jest muzeum.
eggie (2017-06-25 12:06:08+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
eggie (2017-06-25 12:26:45+00:00): Het is in dit geval een beetje verwarrend dat op de adresnode ook een hele riedel staat met name=......
Ik denk dat de naam beter op de adresnode kan blijven staan, maar dan niet die hele riedel die er nu staat. Dat kan beter bij de note toegevoegd worden. 
Volgens de adresnode is Kamerlingh Onnes Gebouw de old_name.
Dus iets om uit te zoeken.
Succes...
Commodoortje (2017-06-25 14:41:03+00:00): Eggie, ik ben het hier mee eens.
George geeft aan in de omscrhijving: "Spellingsfout verbeterd." 
Ik vraag me af welke spellingsfout er aanwezig was.
De info was reeds aanwezig in OSM.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478597994
Hier zag ik de spelfout die je bedoelde.
Ik heb de aangevulde tags overgezet naar deze contour tevens wat aanpassingen verricht.
user_5359 (2017-06-25 15:27:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your entry is a duplicate to an existing object: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148484478
Warin61 (2019-03-05 04:03:21+00:00): OSM guide is one feature one entry in OSM.. 
So I have taken Node: Mount Piddington (400898104) and removed from it

the roof - now a new way
the picnic site .. a new node
peak - new now with ele from LPI topo
aharvey (2019-03-05 06:44:02+00:00): Normally I would agree, but in this case they are all the one feature on the ground.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/136319147@N08/35558842005

The survey mark is at the peak which is part of the picnic table and roof... all one feature on the ground so all one object in OSM.

This is noted in my note "This point is both the peak of the mountain, the physical survey point on a roof over picnic tables, hence all tags are valid in combination at this point."
Warin61 (2019-03-05 23:39:26+00:00): The roof is better mapped as a rectangle, it is the truth as the roof is not a single point, and it will then render. 

The picnic site is an area, if that table is in use I would simply use the lookout area. So I have no problem separating it from that single node.

Then the contentious issue - the trig point and the peak.  I would take the peak as being the highest point of the ground - not the trees nor the building nor the trig point. The area is relatively flat, the area around the building appears to have been graded - therefore lowered. So I would think the present real peak is not there but a short distance away. 

Next .. any map maker will tell you they distort the map in order to be able to present information. In OSM we accept boundary simplifications with some degree of error.

So:
the trig point remains as a single node
the roof as an area coaxial with the roof
the picnic site as a node off to the side (would be better as an area but too indistinct for me.) 
the peak as a node a little way south  

Given all the above I think my changes are acceptable as they are more likely to present the information to the end user rather than have it hidden by one of the features. 

If there are two things that are co-located .. then two nodes - one for each would meet the guide? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
One feature = one OSM element. Not one OSM element (in this case a single node) representing some 4 features.
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
Sanniu (2017-07-03 06:51:09+00:00): Please name object according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Israel#Conventions_and_Guidelines - separate Hebrew and English names
eggie (2017-06-27 09:26:13+00:00): Simon, Wat is de reden dat je de edits van een andere mapper hier hebt verwijderd?
eggie (2017-06-27 09:27:45+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49813798
SimonA (2017-07-09 18:58:46+00:00): De tuin is op 14 juni door de gemeente verwijderd.

https://www.facebook.com/janine.wegman/posts/1672598002770102
eggie (2017-07-09 19:23:27+00:00): Oke...dat is duidelijk. Probeer in je commentaar duidelijk te maken waarom. Ook kun je bij ingrijpende edits de voorgaande mapper informeren. 
Die account vind je onder de historie.
Bedankt voor je reactie...
Supaplex (2017-06-25 17:07:27+00:00): 店家應該是在室內吧？那就應該把店家放到建築範圍裡。
catdreamer (2017-06-25 23:52:39+00:00): 已修正,感謝
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
M!dgard (2017-07-31 17:44:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50727561, 50728501, 50726350 where the changeset comment is: revert bad GRB import
PT-53 (2018-04-28 05:49:52+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
in keep right wird für diesen way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503210284 dieser Hinweis angezeigt: https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=94&error=85545568.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße
Peter
ianlopez1115 (2017-06-25 14:02:51+00:00): offset used is 5.10; -1.78
Supaplex (2017-07-09 18:14:38+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Tiamate (2017-06-25 15:24:38+00:00): vom Notizersteller eingetragen
user_3216889 (2017-06-25 17:53:00+00:00): Ter welkom PB gestuurd.
user_3216889 (2017-06-25 18:23:53+00:00): In Nederland importeren we gegevens voor gebouwen en adressen uit de officiële Basisregistraties Adressen en Gebouwen (BAG). Daarin staat naast nr. 92 ook een huisnr. 90 op dit pand, met als gebruiksdoel 'overige gebruiksfunctie' en een oppervlakte van 8 m2.
Zie: https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/#?geometry.x=94204.857984612&geometry.y=465055.14300918&zoomlevel=6&objectId=0546100000051243&detailsObjectId=0546010000061019
Trojmans (2017-06-26 05:55:40+00:00): Oké