piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
iWowik (2021-10-11 09:57:54+00:00): День добрый!
 Соблюдайте, пожалуйста, принятый порядок наимепнования улиц
osmx12 (2021-10-11 15:02:36+00:00): А что с улицами не так? Название + слово улица. На сколько я видел, так везде https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%20%D0%B1%D1%80%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%2010#map=17/53.87031/27.55769
iWowik (2021-10-12 04:05:28+00:00): Но там же улица+слово вас не насторожило?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/53.86805/27.55139
osmx12 (2021-10-12 06:37:20+00:00): ок, спс
Kevo (2021-10-11 14:51:52+00:00): If you're going to mark the new traffic pattern, please also appropriately name the roads, mark the speed limits, add reference numbers, add lane counts, and create the correct topography from your observations.  We've had a lot of bad edits along the 401 recently so we're trying to avoid it from becoming a mess.  Thanks, Kevin
Frans S (2021-10-10 10:00:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
Please map more accurate and square the buildings you map. Do not include the yard or shadow next to a building.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112311753
kapazao (2021-10-11 16:19:01+00:00): Hola, en casos como este en el que 2 vías quedan muy juntas pero no hay conexión entre ellas, es necesario añadir al nodo final noexit=yes.
Ya lo he corregido.
Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112311760
lluvia2 (2021-10-11 18:06:28+00:00): Hola. Perfecto, gracias. Un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112311760
Sandal man (2021-10-10 19:50:37+00:00): Hola, creo que olvidaste etiquetar esta carretera.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991541863
robertogeb (2021-10-11 12:53:40+00:00): Son líneas de referencia para ortogonalizar el conjunto. Las borraré cuando finalice
Sandal man (2021-10-11 14:27:15+00:00): OK :-)
Konkon153 (2021-10-09 18:50:19+00:00): [ und damit alle Adressen in der Gemeinde Langen Brütz vollständig angepasst ]
ovruni (2021-10-09 20:51:59+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se indica "sendas peatonales", sin embargo ha consistido en borrar varias vías que son visibles por las imágenes aéreas sin motivo aparente, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
user_5359 (2021-10-10 16:30:57+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11270862. You changed or add the following tags
Source=tallerc9 [correct spelling is source]
admin_level =1 [modified from 9 to 1 this means a bigger object as a country]
amenity=restaurant [this area could not be a restaurant]
area =yes [not necessary]
boat=yes [this area could not used by a boat]
Please correct your changes, or I will reverted your change set!
eggie (2021-10-09 20:44:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
woodpeck_repair (2023-11-06 23:58:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 143714052, 143714026, 143714035, 143714023 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits eines benutzers nach selbstlöschung
Lee Carré (2021-10-09 21:09:50+00:00): The changeset comment doesn't match the extent of the bounding box.

See:
* http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
* (what makes for) http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
aceman444 (2021-10-11 00:15:02+00:00): Hi, the 'country' and 'target' tags should contain country code in upper case, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:country .

You are constantly adding embassies all over the world, but with malformed tags and no source.
ovruni (2021-10-09 20:55:06+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se indica "vias menores", sin embargo ha consistido en borrar varias vías que son visibles por las imágenes aéreas sin motivo aparente, también se ha modificado una vía de frontera y aéreas de cultivo, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios. Por favor utilice un comentario en su conjunto de cambios que explico el motivo de sus modificaciones, tal como se indica en los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-10-09 20:13:52+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 112287451, 112287566, 112287612, 112287642, 112287684, 112287753, 112287835, 112287889, 112287920, 112287950, 112287997, 112288029, 112288062, 112288110, 112288151, 112288177, 112288203, 112288235, 112288286, 112288322, 112288374, 112288433, 112288496, 112288569, 112288640, 112288719, 112289113, 112289192, 112289261, 112289317, 112289494, 112289563, 112289618, 112289801, 112289872, 112289938, 112290001, 112290234, 112290293, 112290344, 112290539, 112290686, 112290788, 112290873, 112291120, 112291244, 112291340, 112291459, 112291535, 112291666.
orthocircular (2021-10-10 07:45:31+00:00): Hi there! According to this map, the name of the building might actually be "greenhouse" as opposed to simply being a random farm building.

https://linfield.edu/assets/files/admission/mcminnville-campus-map.pdf
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112314144
literan (2021-10-10 18:28:46+00:00): временное в OSM не вносится. 

к тому же вы некорректно замапили велополосу как отдельную велодорожку.
Kerkiq (2021-10-10 19:29:57+00:00): Велополоса сезонная, причем очень продолжительное время. А замапил её так же как на бульварном кольце, там она везде отдельная.
literan (2021-10-10 19:42:31+00:00): значит, и на Бульварном надо переделывать
Kerkiq (2021-10-10 19:44:34+00:00): может лучше переделать правила?
literan (2021-10-10 19:52:47+00:00): чем же лучше? 
Аргументы нужны очень серьезные - весь мир так замаплен, и работы по переделке в случае принятия вашего предложения предстоит очень много (надеюсь, вы ее возглавите) :-)
Kerkiq (2021-10-10 19:59:09+00:00): По Москве я больше встречаю вариант когда велодорога вдоль автодороги мапится отдельно. Не обязательно чтобы во всём мире был один стандарт, фактически во мире мапят по разному
literan (2021-10-10 20:06:57+00:00): да, велодорога мапится отдельно. Велополоса - не мапится отдельно, все верно.

Договоренности в странах, действительно, имеют место быть. После обсуждений на форуме, (часто) голосований и прописываются в вики.
habi (2022-03-01 14:40:38+00:00): Ciao Manuel
Hier hast du sehr viele Gebäude aus geodienste.ch oder geoportal.ch übernommen.
Hast du die Lizenzbedingungen dazu abgeklärt?

Ich frage mich auch, wie sinnvoll es ist, Gebäude in Relationen mit 7 Mitgliedern abzubilden, wie hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13307897

Ich hab' dich das wegen den Lizenzbedingungen schon einmal gefragt, kannst du mir darauf eine Antwort geben?

Gruss aus Bern (und letzte Woche auf der Riederalp in den Ferien).
habi
manuelfux (2022-03-01 19:24:21+00:00): Hoi Habi
Die Abklärung hatte Tobias Heinzmann im 2018 gemäss dem folgenden Post bereits gemacht:
http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/2018-April/009493.html
Liebe Grüsse 
Manuel

PS: Wo finde ich die Nachrichten aus den Diskussionen? In meiner OSM-Inbox sind diese nicht ersichtlich.
habi (2022-03-07 20:48:07+00:00): Die andere Diskussion war hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113746752, das sollte in deinem Mail landen.
habi (2022-03-07 20:53:25+00:00): > Die Abklärung hatte Tobias Heinzmann im 2018 [...] bereits gemacht

Cool, an diese Diskussion kann ich mich nicht erinnern.
Wie bringst du denn die Daten in iD rein?
Die angegebene URL funktioniert bei mir weder in JOSM noch iD...
habi (2022-03-07 20:54:41+00:00): Und die Frage stellt sich noch, wieso du einzelne Gebäude (aus meiner Sicht zu kompliziert) als Relation darstellst, z.B. wie hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13307897
Ist das so in den geoportal.ch-Daten drin?
habi (2022-03-07 20:59:36+00:00): Und 'Sorge' macht mir vor allem, dass `source=geoportal.ch` ist, die in deren Nutzungsbedingungen "Jede andere Verwendung, insbesondere das vollständige oder teilweise Reproduzieren für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke" als bewilli- gungspflichtig erwähnt wird.
Das scheint mir nicht dasselbe zu sein wie bei geodienste.ch...
manuelfux (2022-03-08 12:30:03+00:00): Hoi Habi

Den vollständigen Link den ich verwendet hatte wäre dieser hier (wird leider abgeschnitten):
https://geodienste.ch/db/av?SERVICE=WMS&VERSION=1.3.0&REQUEST=GetMap&BBOX={bbox}&CRS={proj}&WIDTH={width}&HEIGHT={height}&LAYERS=Rohrleitungen,Bodenbedeckung,Einzelobjekte,Gebaeudeadressen,Nomenklatur,Liegenschaften_projektiert,Liegenschaften,Hoheitsgrenzen,Fixpunkte&FORMAT=image/png&DPI=96&MAP_RESOLUTION=96&TRANSPARENT=TRUE

Gemäss Webseite der Geodienste ist der Kanton VS nicht mehr aufgeführt und mann kann auch kein Datenbezug mehr bestellen (https://geodienste.ch/downloads/av?data_format=wms) daher muss man im "richtigen" Kanon sein um den Layer einblenden zu können. Scheinbar hat sich die Lage bezüglich Datenbezug seither verändert.

Bei der Quelle habe ich mich tatsächlich verschrieben. Kann man das nachträglich korrigieren, sodass die korrekte Quelle "imagery_used" angegeben werden kann?

Bei den etwas aufwändigeren Relationen habe ich mich mit dem iD-Editor näher beschäftigt und versucht herauszufinden wie diese Relationen funktionieren. Leider habe ich dazu in der Wiki nur mangelhafte und für mich unverständliche Informationen gefunden. Das war sozusagen learing by doing. Ich hoffe das ist nicht schlimm.

LG Manuel
SekeRob (2021-11-25 18:17:20+00:00): Hi,

what you did is interesting. If you open up your change set in Id Editor and touch one of your "untagged for renderer" greens a wizard pops up, same for fairways adding the landuse=grass tag back in.

Did a complete 18 holes golf course in great detail and never have done any different than adding the landuse=grass tag and that was before ID Editor went nuts on wizards you cant escape and for greens and fairways the type of mowing of course such as grass=finely_mown on greens.. Never a complaint.

ciao.

FYI
DaveF (2021-12-29 12:37:48+00:00): In Id, click 'Ignore this issue'
SekeRob (2021-12-29 12:53:50+00:00): No I dont cause OSM keeps track of ignores in ID. According the neis report you have 26000 Inspector and Osmose issues and more on items you are recorded as having touched That's a lot of ignoring.
DaveF (2021-12-29 14:17:26+00:00): I've no idea what you're talking about.

If you click 'Ignore this issue' in Id you will "escape the wizard"
SekeRob (2021-12-29 14:40:01+00:00): Here's your statistics as kept by the Neis website

https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?DaveF

They log 'ignore this issue', so i wont.
DaveF (2021-12-29 14:56:26+00:00): I'm aware of neis's statistic page, 
The problem is I don't think you understand what that page is telling you.
SekeRob (2021-12-29 14:58:59+00:00): LoL
Frans S (2021-10-10 09:57:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
Be more accurate and square the buildings.
Don't include the yard or shadow next to a building.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112314819
ovruni (2021-10-09 20:57:21+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha redibujado vías que previamente fueron eliminadas por usted, lo cual no permite mantener el historial [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
ovruni (2021-10-09 20:59:54+00:00): Le dejo también el enlace a la documentación existe sobre las etiquetas highway [0], ya que se borraron vías para agregar vías con otras etiquetas.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:highway
abakus_uploader (2021-10-09 22:31:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
PT-53 (2022-01-28 08:04:20+00:00): Hallo Nachtspatz,
Du hast an dieser Sitzbank
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8088468080/history
das Merkmal
abandoned=yes
ergänzt.
Im OSM-Inspector wird hierzu ein Hinweis "nonop_confusion_on_nodes" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.82942&lat=48.45871&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes

Gem. Wiki DE:Lifecycle prefix
sollte statt
abandoned=yes
das Merkmal
abandoned:amenity=bench
verwendet werden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-02-06 10:13:35+00:00): Hallo Nachtspatz, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-02-16 06:20:57+00:00): Hallo Nachtspatz,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-02-27 09:42:10+00:00): Hallo Nachtspatz, 
es wäre schön wenn Du mal reagieren würdest.
Grüße
PT-53 (2022-03-13 12:03:45+00:00): Hallo Nachtspazz,
muß ich zuerst eine Sperre gegen Dich beantragen, bis Du mal reagierst / antwortest ?
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:18:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
David Andron (2021-10-09 21:19:00+00:00): *houses and canal, not sidewalks
Jerry_W2k (2021-10-11 09:17:04+00:00): Potwierdzam, brak przejazdu.
archpdx (2021-10-13 03:22:42+00:00): Hi,
As another mapper mentioned a few years ago, please use the squaring tool when adding buildings. It also looks like you removed some residential areas, which is fine, but these had housenumbers that could have been moved over to the buildings you added.
osmviborg (2021-10-10 06:40:13+00:00): Du har ændret way 24651008 fra cykelsti til service, er det velvalgt?
UffeKousgaard (2021-10-10 07:36:17+00:00): Sidste ændring er et år siden og ikke mig: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24651008/history

Men cykelsti ville nok være mere korrekt, da der er en egentlig "service road" parallelt med.
osmviborg (2021-10-10 09:51:02+00:00): Også min tanke.
juststuss (2021-10-09 21:58:42+00:00): https://www.bad-aibling.de/fileadmin/redakteur_buergerservice/pdf/Bauen_und_Planen/Bestehender_Fl%C3%A4chennutzungsplan__Stand_April_2013.pdf
Wulfmorn (2021-10-11 12:24:46+00:00): dog=yes :D
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
martinst (2021-10-10 05:48:12+00:00): typo: Damwikdgehege
SekeRob (2021-10-10 07:11:18+00:00): How does one do that and why(?) with StreetComplete, an in-situ surveying app meant to update the map 'while there' on the spot. A building in Dublin, Ireland and a building in south central Italy being type tagged within the minute.... Flash Gordon at work?
There's better OSM editing software to do this wide apart updating and create small discreet edit sets that nobody but the local mapper will see, now the whole of the EU mapping community is told. StreetComplete is definitely not designed to do that... it throws all of the same in the same change set during a session simply because it was developed to update while going door to door.

So you know.
Lee Carré (2021-10-10 10:39:32+00:00): Like SekeRob said; smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

StreetComplete is only for making changes input while actually there, on-site.
Since I seriously doubt that you're a playboy with a private jet, then source=survey is very misleading. At best its local knowledge. So, use an editor which allows you to set the value of the source tag (viz Vespucci) and then separate different areas into separate (small) changesets. Else, don't ignore the were-you-really-there? warnings that StreetComplete gives when your location doesn't (closely) match the location of the element you're changing. Use it only as intended: for actual surveying of your local area (or wherever you are at the time).

If you do indeed travel, then upload your quest-answers from one area BEFORE answering quests in a different area (most airports have 802.11 (Wi-Fi) now).

Other mappers thank you in advance for your consideration & cooperation in what is ultimately a community project.
jmc (2021-10-10 12:10:50+00:00): Apologies, I didn't consider that StreetComplete would bulk-upload changes for different geographical regions in a single changeset, and especially with source=survey. I happen to be very familiar with both areas and I was just trying to contribute to the completeness of OSM in those regions.

Truth is, StreetComplete is the most effective tool to highlight missing details that I can help fill in -- none of the web-based editors I know do that. I'm happy to receive suggestions if any do exist.
Lee Carré (2021-10-10 20:42:08+00:00): “StreetComplete is the most effective tool to highlight missing details that I can help fill in — none of the web-based editors I know do that. I'm happy to receive suggestions if any do exist.”

It's one tool, but not the only one. By all means use SC for reference, but edit with something more granular.

Others include:
▪︎OsmBugs (for Android, available via F-Droid) which shows: OSM notes, Osmose, KeepRight, and MapDust
▪︎configuring Vespucci to highlight whatever you regard as problematic
▪︎http://streetcompleteness.haukauntrie.de/ (though at this very moment it seems to be having some technical difficulties)
▪︎http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Completeness lists a bunch of resources

Keep in mind that SC only shows pins for pre-programmed quests. Lots more can be added (for which there aren't (yet(?)) quests) with a more generic editor. As the most obvious example, missing features can't be added with SC (or doing anything beyond tagging).

To enhance the map, the best thing would be to survey your local area. Let others do the same for elsewhere. Editing from afar has risks (viz how do you know it hasn't changed since you were last there?).

An important way would be via the ‘check’ quests (‘does … still exist?’), in order to keep more volatile features up-to-date.

“I didn't consider that StreetComplete would bulk-upload changes for different geographical regions in a single changeset”

You implicitly assumed that it would auto-magically handle it. How would it (reliably) determine where to make the split? Why would it need to when it's intended for on-the-ground surveying (and you're limited by, at most, driving distance within a day, but preferably walking distance)?

If you insist, like I said, configure SC to never auto-upload, and then manually sync after finishing one area before starting in another. That'll separate the changes into different sets.

When using a more granular editor, you'll want to set
source = local knowledge
for areas that you know but aren't actually present at.

A desire to enhance the map is fine (I quite relate), but there are good vs. bad ways of going about it. A project of this magnitude has to be structured, lest it become chaos.

I would strongly recommend, for newbies, using SC in your local area. Then examining the changesets it commits to begin learning the clockwork, in order to proficiently use more capable editors (which do less hand-holding).

Even as a contributor who uses Vespucci almost exclusively now, I still have SC running while out surveying, as one of the sources of info on areas that need refinement.
jmc (2021-10-16 18:32:10+00:00): > You implicitly assumed that it would auto-magically handle it. How would it (reliably) determine where to make the split?

Presumably it'd be as simple as uploading each quest to its own changeset, or applying very simple heuristics (at a minimum, different city → different changeset?).

Anyways, this is drifting off topic quickly.

More to the point, you seem to be recommending not to use StreetComplete at all. If so, then this disclaimer should go into StreetComplete itself (open issue against developers).
limes11 (2021-10-10 08:04:31+00:00): Hi, 

bicycle=no gilt implizit auf hw=footway, braucht nicht extra gesetzt werden.

Schönen Sonntag, Limes
nevw (2021-10-12 02:01:01+00:00): Hi
you have used the mapped wooded areas to define the proposed Coomera City Centre.
The wooded areas currently exist and should remained mapped in osm.

It would be better to leave the wooded boundaries as they were and create a new boundary for the proposed Coomera City Centre or to use re-use the wooded boundaries segments to create a multipolygon of the proposed Coomera City Centre.

It seems to me that the proposed Coomera City Centre is mapped approximately by re-using the wooded boundaries or do the individual wooded areas reflect different stages of the proposed development.
Is there a source that can be used in the OSM to more accurately define the proposed Coomera City Centre.

A point of the proposed Coomera City Centre boundary joins the rail line and needs to be disconnected.

Does the current Bing imagery reasonably define the current state of the wooded areas?
nevw (2021-10-24 03:11:42+00:00): no response, reverted until I hear back from the mapper and/or the Gold Coast City Council regarding this. Will remap as a multipolygon separately from existing wooded areas if more info is forthcoming.