piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FinixFighter (2020-10-21 07:11:38+00:00): I don't see a building here, so I think "kiosk" would be better. If you look and OSM wiki for kiosk and newsagent there are esplicative photos too. A newsagent seems a shop inside a building which sell newspapers, while a kiosk is an "independent" stand.
TihiyDon (2020-10-27 08:41:09+00:00): Дружище, ты реально считаешь себя самым умным?
ovruni (2020-10-19 23:47:07+00:00): Hola, en esta edición se ha ingresado el nombre descriptivo de "Terreno sin Edificar", sin embargo la vía ya contiene la etiqueta "landuse=greenfield" que brinda información similar para dicho objeto, además el uso de nombres descriptivos es desaconsejado[0], por tal motivo se ha retirado dicho valor de nombre descriptivo. Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
user_5359 (2020-10-22 15:20:27+00:00): Hello! What is meaning of the tree with the tag
0=(55)
9=9170-8300
?
santamariense (2020-10-22 16:16:18+00:00): It's a cell phone number. I bet it was pasted by mistake or pasted by mistake in the incorrect object.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:30:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
Arun Madhavan (2020-10-20 05:39:02+00:00): playground is already marked. Removing duplicate
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92732555
mdelatorre (2020-10-20 01:39:30+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM. I reviewed your changeset and determined that can be IMPROVED. You have tagged the road as highway=unclassified, this tag is not used for residential streets or agricultural tracks. The road you mapped is a dirt road, known in México as "brechas". This agricultural tracks should be mapped as highway=track, tracktype=*, surface=* and smoothness=*  https://bit.ly/3o3ysKx. Have a good day.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92733198
127logs (2020-10-20 19:38:44+00:00): Thank you for reaching out. I added these as unclassified roads because they are well used and are well established roads. They are not really serving the purpose of residential, so I felt unclassified was the best classification. I did not add them as tracks since tracks typically carry far less traffic and used far less often than these roads. 

Gracias por comunicarte. Los agregué como caminos sin clasificar porque están bien utilizados y son caminos bien establecidos. En realidad, no sirven para el propósito de residenciales, por lo que sentí que sin clasificar era la mejor clasificación. No los agregué como pistas, ya que las pistas suelen tener mucho menos tráfico y se usan con mucha menos frecuencia que estas carreteras.
mdelatorre (2020-10-24 22:56:47+00:00): This road is in the middle of nowhere. How can you determine from the imagery the traffic?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92733198
127logs (2020-10-26 17:00:25+00:00): Thank you for your question. By looking at the area with satellite imagery, these roads are all very clearly defined and lead to various establishments and structures. They are far more defined than the small, track roads present in the area. By comparing the function of these roads and how defined they are, that would indicate they should not be the same classification as the small, poorly defined track roads in the area. That is how I determined unclassified would be a far more appropriate classification. 

Gracias por tu pregunta. Al observar el área con imágenes de satélite, estas carreteras están muy claramente definidas y conducen a varios establecimientos y estructuras. Están mucho más definidas que las pequeñas carreteras de pista presentes en el área. Al comparar la función de estas carreteras y su definición, eso indicaría que no deberían tener la misma clasificación que las carreteras pequeñas y mal definidas de la zona. Así es como determiné que sin clasificar sería una clasificación mucho más apropiada.
mariotomo (2021-03-22 20:21:17+00:00): si sigues interesado a OSM, y quieres seguir mejorando las abreviaciones, seguramente te resultará más fácil apoyarte a esta búsqueda osmose: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=14&lat=8.10273&lon=-80.95989&item=5010%2C5020
ianlopez1115 (2021-04-02 06:49:16+00:00): More appropriate tags were used for most items modified in this changeset since they aren't exactly memorials but artworks commissioned by the local parish.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92733351
GOwin (2021-04-02 09:08:32+00:00): Thank you for elaborating, @ianlopez1115. 👌
Carnildo (2020-10-20 20:45:18+00:00): Please be more careful when you're adding buildings.  In particular, this building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860887050) was already on the map as "recently demolished".
Carnildo (2020-10-20 21:01:59+00:00): Could you please pay more attention to what the AI is telling you to do?  By my count, this changeset mapped: 1) A building that was actually three buildings, 2) A building overlapping a parking lot, 3) A building that was demolished about five years ago, 4) A building that was actually two buildings, and 5) Two buildings that only vaguely resembled the actual structures.
danieldegroot2 (2020-10-21 11:21:03+00:00): Misschien zou het een goed idee zijn om de vlakken op te splitsen. Het fietspad loopt nu over het gras.

Gebruik waar mogelijk de volle naam van de layer (bron) die je gebruikt. Dan begrijpt iedereen over welke layer je het hebt.
A67-A67 (2020-10-21 12:46:16+00:00): Ik zal het gras/bomen opsplitsen rond het fietspad.

Ik heb de laag BGT omtrekgericht gebruikt. De Superview-luchtfoto staat niet standaard in OSM, maar is te vinden via https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl
Allison P (2020-12-17 20:32:58+00:00): Borah Park has already been mapped. Twice, strangely. There were some tags not on the old one though, so I'm transferring them over. Thank you for that information, but in the future make sure you're not duplicating a feature. Thank you!
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-20 03:50:00+00:00): Hi, you deleted ref=2902 and start_date off the traffic signals your adjusted. Was this intentional?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92734869
ortho_is_hot (2020-10-20 09:43:56+00:00): Hi there, given the number of versions of this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23098197/history (35 versions), I've restored it as part of the history, reusing it as a different part of the road (did this in changeset 92757507).

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-20 10:02:08+00:00): I have added ref and start_date back in changeset 92758811
osmowm87 (2020-10-23 07:53:13+00:00): Apologies - the deletion was unintentional
Firemix (2020-10-29 22:08:38+00:00): Hon'able Centralhub,
which type of features were fixed here?
Minh Nguyen (2020-10-29 19:03:40+00:00): Hi, thanks for cleaning up the road geometry in this area. As you do so in Ohio, please refer to the OSIP 1ft and OSIP 6in layers whenever available. The OSIP 1ft layer is not as current as OSIP 6in, but both OSIP layers are more consistently and accurately aligned than other available layers. You can also refer to this table to decide on the right layer for the task at hand: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ohio#Resources . Thanks for your attention to this detail!
sgaraboi (2020-10-30 09:24:33+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for the appreciation. Will surely follow the information provided about Ohio. Looking forward to learn more from you. Happy mapping!

Regards,
sgaraboi.
sailajc (2020-10-20 04:30:21+00:00): Hi,
Please find the appropriate comment for the Changset: 92735962 "Modified the geometry as per latest imagery".

Regards,
Sailajc.
Diana IRM-ED (2021-06-17 02:20:51+00:00): Hi, CorazonDelator. I hope all is well. I found a highway crossing with this waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/345425932), would you mind fixing this issue? or please let me know if there's any update on this area. Thank you and happy mapping!
felipeeugenio (2020-10-20 17:11:44+00:00): Estimado Erick
una cosa es que haya una traza de gps, pero otra cosa muy distinta es que haya un camino. Es un concepto totalmente distinto. Varios de los caminos presentes en tus ediciones no tienen relación con lo que se observa en la foto satelital.
incluso en donde si se aprecia un camino, te pedimos por favor dedicar un poco mas de tiempo y expresar bien las curvas. es como que estuvieras importando las trazas en estado puro.
itineris (2020-11-03 19:06:25+00:00): Szia!

Valamiért törölted a HU:ed_direction címkét az M1->101 áthajtóról, pedig a teherautók útdíjazásához használjuk ezt az információt. Kérlek, legközelebb figyelj oda jobban!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
DUGA (2024-01-06 05:35:15+00:00): Maybe get a dictionary before making changes.
SomeoneElse (2024-01-10 01:12:51+00:00): Hello DUGA,
OpenStreetMap is a joint project that we all work on together.  Sometimes we make mistakes - I do, and I suspect that you probably do too.  A comment like the one you made here on a 3-year-old changeset by a user with only 34 edits to their name because they accidentally misspelt "chapel" makes you look like a bit of a dick.
Perhaps you ought to consider apologising?
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)
DUGA (2024-01-10 18:43:39+00:00): I don’t think so being a dick.

Getting a dictionary is actually a good advice, I don’t see any reason of not mentioning it. I don’t even assume anyone speaking perfect english, that’s why I used “maybe”.
DUGA (2024-01-10 18:45:12+00:00): And also, most of my time I will just ignore any further reply, because I just correct the issue after leaving the comment.

Perhaps it sounds a bit weird, but English is not my first language as well.
naveenpf (2020-10-30 10:55:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM India. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on. https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92738348
dichroism (2020-12-12 10:47:30+00:00): The quality of these house footprints seems to be very low. Where do they come from?
Your Village Maps (2021-10-09 02:52:00+00:00): I can't find any proof of the existence of any new road for CR 88 running north of 292nd Street East. What is your source? Esri imagery does not show this road. Is it under construction or proposed? Dakota County GIS doesn't even show it.
abvincen (2021-10-11 11:03:01+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit.Apologies for the incorrect road digitization. I'll ensure to not repeat such errors going ahead.
Thank you once again for fixing the error, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
abvincen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92743796
Your Village Maps (2021-10-11 20:55:18+00:00): I'm not sure you were the one who added this. Anyway, I have edited the proposed road (scheduled to be constructed in 2023) to show it as proposed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92743796
majkaz (2020-10-20 09:04:53+00:00): Ahoj, vítám u mapování. Ty změny jsou ale blbě, i když je to vlastní barák :) Po to změně jste 2 metry u sousedů a šejdrem k ulici. Navíc máte v mapě adresu dvakrát.

Bing je mírně posunutý, je třeba ho "napasovat" na katastrální mapu. Jako základ pro budovy se bere RUIAN. Ten sice nemusí být přesný, ale u Vás sedí :) 
V Čechách na budovu adresu nedáváme, je na adresním bodu (když se podíváš, je uprostřed bod 668724343, na kterém ty údaje jsou. 
Ty změny vrátím. Příště doporučuji pro všechnu editaci zapnout tu katastrální mapu, je z ní hned vidět, kde to ujíždí.
Magnolist (2020-10-20 10:02:49+00:00): Ahoj, díky za laskavé upozornění a poučení. Budu opatrnější, až se k něčemu dalšímu dostanu.
hocu (2020-10-23 12:11:58+00:00): Hi, welcome to the OpenStreetMap, thanks for your contribution.

Please do not add desxription or comments in the name fields. Because name fields are displayed on maps, thus your cafe would be named "Cheap and tasty. Big portions" on the map. There's a note field in Maps.me app for a note do the editors. Use that field and other people editing the map could find a way to indicate that.

Keep contributing, this map grows with your help. Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92745112
aceman444 (2021-04-03 01:15:48+00:00): Hi, you can't add a non-existent tram route as a valid route=train relation. There must be some 'abandoned' tag in the relations so that data consumers can know to ignore it for current transportation. I will do it.
Arun Madhavan (2020-10-20 12:45:31+00:00): The shape is improved it is not a building so remove building=yes tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92746723
Arun Madhavan (2020-10-20 12:45:43+00:00): its more a temple area
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92746723
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:01:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
eggie (2020-10-20 07:37:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.



review.. Probeer svp bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Nieuwe adressen aanmaken hoeft niet in OSM.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-20 07:40:24+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht. Info samengevoegd met adresnode
Myazyk (2021-07-31 20:49:50+00:00): А нащо ти видалив залізничну зупинку Болехівці?
eggie (2020-10-24 20:32:07+00:00): De info heb ik hier samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
gr eggie
aachso (2020-12-04 00:29:34+00:00): Moin, hier glaubt jemand, dass der Bücherschrank an der falschen Stelle steht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2444680

Auf der Webseite von Haus Hörn wird von einem Bücherschrank gegschrieben, der an der Bushaltestelle Halifaxstraße steht: https://www.haus-hoern.de/2016/04/11/ein-buecher-tausch-schrank-auf-der-hoern/

Hast du dich vertan oder gibt es einfach zwei Bücherschränke bei Haus Hörn?
ArthurMcGill (2020-12-04 08:32:11+00:00): Hallo, da habe ich mich wohl vertan, habe dies nun korrigert lt. Website und den Angaben im BIldtext auf https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aachen,_B%C3%BCchertauschschrank_an_der_Ahornstra%C3%9Fe_--_2016_--_2840.jpg?uselang=de, Danke für die Info, Gruß, Arthur
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 11:08:06+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317613601/history has 3=6 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Marwis00 (2024-02-20 11:19:11+00:00): poprawione
user_2066394 (2020-10-20 08:55:58+00:00): amenity=Lkw-Waage ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-11 17:57:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860959992/history

Should it be resource=aggregate ?
❤️‍🔥 (2024-01-13 07:56:16+00:00): oops, fixed
Denis Chenu dit Shnoulle (2020-10-25 16:35:40+00:00): Bin oui : mais il faut changer toutes les adresses de la rue dans ce cas …
Denis Chenu dit Shnoulle (2020-10-25 16:40:44+00:00): Sur https://guichet-adresse.ign.fr/map/ "Avenue Jean-Baptiste Lebas" 

Et : https://adresse.data.gouv.fr/explore/commune/59512/voie/59512_2800

Je pense donc que le alt-name devrait être Avenue Jean Lebas et le nom garder le Baptiste
kapazao (2020-10-20 12:08:08+00:00): Hola, la población se llama oficialmente Padul, no El Padul, no sé si la laguna tendrá el nombre que has puesto, pero creo que lo ideal sería dejarla como estaba.
En cuanto a lo de la ruta del mamut trataré de investigar y corregir la zona.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92753206
*Martin* (2020-12-06 18:16:19+00:00): Prosim madarske nazvy davaj do znacky name:hu. A co je to prosim za zdroj "obecSilica?
Viktor Voda (2021-02-03 17:59:53+00:00): Zdrojom je obecný úrad v Silici. Neviem kto vymyslel tie slovenské názvy, ale nezodpovedajú skutočnosti. napr szamároska nie je samé rožky, ale miesto odpočinku oslov. 
Viktor Voda, zástupca starostu
*Martin* (2021-02-03 19:25:55+00:00): povodne nazvy tam boli zadane z katastralnej mapy, takze to sa treba pytat asi na katastralnom urade.

Mimochodom v ZBGIS (a jeho WMS/WFS sluzbach) najdete zavazne standardizovane nazvoslovie.
Tomas Straupis (2020-10-20 09:43:39+00:00): pigu.lt is NOT a mall.
Anton Khorev (2020-11-04 18:50:05+00:00): Вам по коптеру не может быть видно, где находятся входные двери, так что вы зря их удаляете, а потом наугад ставите:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6138326924/history
Aulus (2020-11-04 19:00:06+00:00): Прошу прощения. Внешние двери корректирую по панорамам. Дворы как правило, прорисованы настолько примерно что нет возможности точно понять где именно она должна быть. В этом случае после уточнения контура ставлю примерно на то место где была. В целом стараюсь точки не удалять, но иногда приходится.
Anton Khorev (2020-11-04 19:13:06+00:00): А вы бы и не смогли поставить эту дверь на место, потому что на месте вы решили воспроизвести искажения снимка. 

Если весь квартал сдвинут метра на три, можно было бы начать со сдвига всего квартала, тогда не пришлось бы думать, что нарисовано примерно, а что точно. Но пока ни один участник, который уточняет по коптерным снимкам до этого не догадался, и приходится искать нествинутые точки среди сдвинутых точек и т.д. Особенно удивляют точки магазинов, оказавшиеся после уточнений за пределами зданий. Мне кажется, что этого нереально не заметить, но уточняющим участникам не заметить как-то удаётся.
Aulus (2020-11-04 19:33:12+00:00): Как правило квартал нет смысла сдвигать метра на три, т.к часть линий нарисованы вообще не туда, часть можно подвинуть а часть неожиданно правильно. 
Если я где-то пропустил не подвинув ПОИ - достаточно написать в комментариях и я исправлю свою ошибку. 
Но да, проще двигать точки на пол пикселя и называть это посткоптерными правками... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8024525994/history#map=19/59.92439/30.34380
Anton Khorev (2020-11-04 20:22:15+00:00): "Как правило квартал нет смысла сдвигать метра на три" - имеет, но многим лень, поэтому они придумывают причины, почему не имеет.

"т.к часть линий нарисованы вообще не туда" - поправляется после сдвига или их можно не трогать, если непонятно, как на самом деле их надо исправлять, и надо ли вообще.

"а часть неожиданно правильно" - так станет после исправлений, подобных вашим. Если было и до, то после станет ещё больше.

"Если я где-то пропустил не подвинув ПОИ" - не вы один, а все, кто уточняет по снимкам, потому что см. первую цитату.

"достаточно написать в комментариях" - ну ПОИ вам удалось бы подвинуть, но зачем я буду каждому про них писать, если я и сам могу. Мне просто интересно, как вам всем удаётся их не замечать, если они в нескольких метрах от тех точек, которые вы двигаете. Редактировать самому мне всё равно придётся, потому что см. комментарий №3, 

"Но да, проще двигать точки на пол пикселя и называть это посткоптерными правками" -
Эта точка, которая сдвинута на полпикселя, находится примерно на уровне земли. А края крыш на нём не находятся, из-за чего на них искажения ну и крыши шире, чем сами здания. Поэтому я провожу прямую линию по уровню земли, а дальше выстраиваю по ней все точки, которым следует на ней находиться. Некоторые из точек сдвинутся на сантиметр, некоторые - гораздо дальше, почти на метр.
UrSuS (2021-06-22 10:38:37+00:00): Sveiki! Kads ir avots nosaukumam "Mežzīļu ceļš"?
Tibery (2021-06-22 10:59:43+00:00): Kuldīgas novada pašvaldības ceļu reģistrs.
UrSuS (2021-06-22 11:06:30+00:00): Kur to var apskatit?
Tibery (2021-06-22 11:08:24+00:00): Pašvaldībā, pagastā vai LVC.
UrSuS (2021-06-22 12:49:54+00:00): Majag linku lai parabauditu datu license, jo osm driks izmantot tikai atvertos datus
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility
eggie (2020-10-20 10:34:52+00:00): Dag Hans.. Svp geen bedrijfsnamen op de pandomtrek zetten. HEMA is al vermeld op de adresnode.
De naam heb ik verwijderd
MVG.
Eggie
bxl-forever (2020-10-28 23:43:42+00:00): Hello,
Good point to add sidewalks.
You might be interested to know that we have detailed UrbIS imagery for Brussels with proper calibration (never draw on top of AGIV in Brussels, otherwise we’ll have to clean up after you).
freeExec (2020-10-20 11:23:51+00:00): Зачем вы объединяете лес и воду, когда на снимке видно, что между ними есть берег?
Pantanal5 (2020-10-22 13:40:30+00:00): Hi freeExec, I merged the water and wood because I imagery shows that they share a common boundary for the most part. I can see very small strips of shoreline in some areas. If you prefer that these features are not merged I can unglue them. Are there any particular areas that you are concerned about?
habi (2020-10-20 15:01:27+00:00): Please confine your changes to a relatively small geographic area.
Reviewing them (like requested) like this is really hard.
habi (2020-10-20 15:01:55+00:00): Also, "autres" isn't really well describing what you changed in this changeset :)
DO Antoine (2020-11-08 08:55:01+00:00): Sorry about this inconvenient. I will more attention for next time
user_8722718 (2020-10-20 21:45:28+00:00): Ciao kaitu, sei più esperto di me, per cui ti chiedo per chiarirmi le idee: il tag highway=track è per le strade in cui potrebbe passare (cioè in larghezza) un veicolo, oppure per le strade sì di questo genere, ma solo ad uso forestale o agricolo? Perché il wiki non è chiaro.
kaitu (2020-10-21 09:31:38+00:00): Tendenzialmente solo per quelle che i veicoli percorrono per prevalente uso forestale o agricolo. 
La mulattiera per San Maurizio non mi sembra rientri in questo caso, forse un tempo quando non esisteva la strada. Oggi è composta da tratti vietati ai veicoli con accesso fisicamente impedito da barriere, che ho classificato come pedonali; altri tratti sono, almeno fisicamente, accessibili ai veicoli diretti ad edifici prospicenti, li ho classificati come service.
ndm (2020-10-20 10:24:07+00:00): Just wrong will be reverted
back_spin (2020-10-20 10:33:16+00:00): oneway obstructs ride from Bradley Stoke Way in Woodlands Lane. see bing satellite
ndm (2020-10-20 10:50:42+00:00): Can you please clarify what problem you are seeing. Post a link to a route on OsmAnd website that doesn’t work. I will check tonight. But at the moment it’s on the revert list.
ndm (2020-10-20 10:51:29+00:00): OsmAnd == Osm, using e.g. graph hopper router, etc.
back_spin (2020-10-20 11:19:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=51.54291%2C-2.56197%3B51.54409%2C-2.56338#map=17/51.54344/-2.56404

but our customers and bing satellite confirms that a right turn is possible
ndm (2020-10-20 18:01:39+00:00): You're right -- was a lot easier to see the issue with the routing link.