piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-16 13:50:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5446923417/You added shop=restaurant there.

Have you intended to map a restaurant?

Or place selling equipment for restaurants?

Or something else?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-16 13:50:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5446923417/

You added shop=restaurant there.

Have you intended to map a restaurant?

Or place selling equipment for restaurants?

Or something else?
hoserab (2018-03-04 21:35:02+00:00): If you had ever set foot (no pun intended) on Stephen Avenue you'd know the changes you made here are completely incorrect. Changing it to residential is about as far off the mark as you could have possibly been. I have reverted your erroneous edits and changed the motor vehicle access to conditional; please don't edit this road any further, it is obvious you're not familiar with it whatsoever.
user_5359 (2018-03-02 08:38:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
tux67 (2018-03-02 12:05:50+00:00): Hallo fireurkel,

willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.

Ist dieses  ein offizielles Gebäude, daß es eine Webseite der Gemeinde hat? Wenn ja, welches? Rathaus?


Es wäre schön, wenn du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
Stephan (tux67)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56808803
fireurkel (2018-03-02 12:13:17+00:00): Das ist das Rathaus der Gemeinde Titz.
www.gemeinde-titz.de
Gruß
Stephan
tux67 (2018-03-02 16:35:52+00:00): Danke, Stephan ;-)

Dann hab ich das jetzt mal mit einem amenity=townhall versehen und bald sollte es dann als solches in der Karte auftauchen.

Gruß
Stephan
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56825304
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
MKnight (2020-10-10 09:43:19+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240669141
oneway=yes durch oneway=no ersetzt.

Wozu? Die Strasse darf nur in eine Richtung befahren werden, da hilft auch fehlendes Einbahnstrassenschild nix.

oneway=no bedeutet nach meinem Verständnis, dass die Strasse explizit in beide Richtungen befahren werden darf, dem ist aber nicht so.
ilmlaender (2020-10-12 17:26:45+00:00): Na hallo, ich war schon lange am Nachdenken über diese spartanische Verkehrsführung dort, anfangs ohne Kartierungsabsicht. Mir war nur klar: es ist kein eigentlicher Kreisverkehr, auch wenn man rechts im Kreis fahren muß um diese Insel. Und der "Stich" nach Osten, der hat im Grunde einen Mittelstreifen zwischen zwei Fahrstreifen, und dadurch ist die Fahrtrichtung vorgegeben. Und somit fehlt dann auch kein Schild Einbahnstraße; wo nötig, regeln blauweiße Richtungspfeile die Einfahrtsrichtungen. Ergo, defacto gibt es hier keinerlei Einbahnstraße; unser allgemeines Rechtsfahrgebot regelt, in welche Richtung hier gefahren wird. Wie muß dieser Fall also kartiert werden?
MKnight (2020-10-12 18:39:40+00:00): Naja, es gibt 2 Möglichkeiten:
- oneway=yes dran, obwohl es nicht ganz richtig ist, 
oneway=no weg, weil es ganz falsch ist. 5e grade sein lassen.

- Man kann das auch richtig machen und alles mit Abbiegebeschränkungen bewerfen. oneway=no muss trotzdem weg, weil ganz falsch.
ilmlaender (2020-10-16 05:04:10+00:00): Wir haben uns dazu ausgetauscht. Nun mach es bitte einfach richtig an diesem "Knoten"! – Meiner Ansicht nach müßte die Straßenbehörde an der Einmündung dieses fraglichen Straßenabschnittes in den "Ring" ein Zeichen 267 "Verbot der Einfahrt" aufstellen. Ich werde dies bei Gelegenheit an geeigneter Stelle der Stadtverwaltung vorbringen.
mueschel (2018-03-04 16:50:29+00:00): Hi,
please don't upload test data to the main OSM database. There is a dedicated development server available, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_the_dev_server
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:01:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:02:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
tonyf1 (2018-03-03 03:23:03+00:00): Hi. Carwash is a description, not a name, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
tonyf1 (2018-03-06 03:45:20+00:00): deleted name, Carwash is a description, not a name, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:03:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
user_5359 (2018-03-02 08:36:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
kempelen (2018-03-02 12:26:19+00:00): Szia! Kértél ellenőrzést a szerkesztéshez. Nem teljesen jó. Arrébb tologattál dolgokat, szerintem nem szándékosan: a zöldséges a Csongor utca közepére 55 métert ugrott, a kínai büfét a hátsóudvarhoz, és a Karaffán elhelyeztél egy funkció nélküli pontot. 

Csak a 360-at szeretted volna módosítani? Akkor a többit visszacsinálom és visszaugranak a helyükre.
Iamlaszlo (2018-03-02 12:30:52+00:00): Szia, Itt lakom, így a módosításokat tudatosan végeztem el. A funkció nélküli pontot nem tudom, hogy helyeztem el. A Sandy Sun már 2 vagy 3 éve megszűnt, sajnos nem tudtam törölni. A Karfa borszaküzlet is megszünt, a nála feltöltött kép pedig nem hozzá tartozik. A Karafa helyén kb 1 éve egy utazási iroda van már. Ez a linkje: http://luxusnaszut.hu/kapcsolat.html
kempelen (2018-03-02 13:17:53+00:00): Értem, köszi a frissítéseket. De a zöldséges kiment az útra és a házszám interpolációs vonal részévé vált, ez csak nem tudatos? Meg az is fura, hogy a kínai étterem majdnem a hátsó udvarban van. Szerintem ezeket véletlenül húztad arrébb. (Emlékszem, hogy hol van az a bolt, az épület íves részéről nyílik. Én rajzoltam be 5 éve. :) Persze változhat.)

A bezárt boltot szépségszalont érdremes disused:shop=beauty-ra átjelölni és a nevét törölni, így a bolt-hely megmarad és később újra nyitható ha lesz ott valami. 

A másik boltot is persze akkor át kell szerkeszteni utazási irodává, megtenném, de először azt kellene eldönteni, hogy vissza kell-e repíteni a zöldségest meg a kínait a ház íves részére, mert ha megint változik akkor nem tudom "revertelni".
Iamlaszlo (2018-03-02 13:27:59+00:00): A zöldségest valószínűleg én nem húztam rossz helyre. Ezen a képen bejelöltem a zöldségest, hogy hol van pontosan és a kínai éttermet is: http://prntscr.com/iluu27 
Remélem így már sikerült jól elmagyaráznom  :) 
Akkor a szerkesztést  nyugodtan vond vissza. Ha ez megvan, akkor a borboltot módosítom utazási irodára. 
Nagyon szépen köszönöm a segítséged. :)
kempelen (2018-03-02 13:56:56+00:00): A history szerinti változásokat itt piros és zöld korongok jelzik:
http://www.osmtippek.hu/Images/tmp/zoldseges.png
http://www.osmtippek.hu/Images/tmp/kinai.png
Zöld az elem új helye, a piros karika az eredeti (szerkesztésed előtti). A térképen még nem frissült a nézeten, lehet, hogy ezért nem volt világos, mire gondolok. 

Ezt a két változást és a jelöletlen pontot visszavontam, és beraktam az ÚJ zöldségest, de ha a kanyarban már nincs zöldséges, akkor meg kéne nézni mi van a helyén. A bolt pontját jobb nem átrakni az új zöldségesre, hanem a bolt helyén hagyni és az új ott nyitott boltra átjelölni. (Habár ha az a UGYANAZ a bolt költözik el akkor az átrakás is jó  megoldás! Ha ez történt, akkor bocs, hogy visszacsináltam, de mindegy, most már az új zöldséges is megvan!). (Viszont megvan a régi is, amit esetleg módosítani kell ha más nyílt ott.)
Iamlaszlo (2018-03-02 14:01:54+00:00): Itt az volt a story, hogy a Teveszed ABC kiköltözött a teve utca elejére, ott régen Erste bank volt. Azt kibővítették - sokkal nagyobb lett. A zöldséges egy része beleolvadt az ABC-be, a másik részét meg egybenyitották a korábbi Teveszed ABC helyével. Ez lett a kínai étterem. A képek segítettek, így már én is jobban értem a szerkesztést. Köszönöm!
seattlefyi (2018-03-02 17:18:27+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating the map! Just a couple of notes 1) If a business changes, please just change those tags, instead of deleting the entire node (that way, we don't lose the address info). 2) Do you happen to know the name of the new bar? Thanks again! If you have questions, please feel free to ask.
atcomapper (2018-03-02 08:59:44+00:00): Do not add maxspeed=15 to a living street, where the max permitted speed is actually 50, but the advisory maxspeed is 15. Instead, use maxspeed:advisory=15
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Orschel-OSM (2018-03-11 18:54:39+00:00): Don't change a construction site to a building-layer, since the outside dimensions doesn't match and the whole area is not equal to the dimension of the building! changed it back to construction area, as long as there is no data (lenght, ...) of the building available!
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:04:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:05:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
SammysHP (2018-03-10 12:39:51+00:00): Hallo Jotam,
 
bist du dir sicher, dass es sich hierbei um einen Blitzer handelt und nicht um eine Mautsäule (in Blau), die hier auch irgendwo stehen müsste?
 
Viele Grüße
SammysHP
SammysHP (2018-03-10 13:04:08+00:00): Siehe auch http://www.blitzer.de/187039423
Jotam (2018-03-12 12:12:37+00:00): Mmh, also ich bin dort vorbei gefahren und das Ding sah sehr nach einem Blitzer aus. Allerdings weiß ich auch nicht genau, wie Maut-SÄULEN aussehen müssten. (Ich kenne nur die Mautsystem, die über den Autobahnen montiert sind.) Wie kann man das denn heraus finden? Ich fahre demnächst wieder dort lang...
SammysHP (2018-03-12 18:09:06+00:00): Blitzer: http://www.kn-online.de/var/storage/images/kn/lokales/kiel/stress-an-der-blitzersaeule/20459132-1-ger-DE/Stress-an-der-Blitzersaeule_pdaArticleWide.jpg
 
Mautsäule: https://www.volksstimme.de/storyimage/MA/20180202/ARTIKEL/180209796/AR/0/AR-180209796.jpg
 
Am Freitag werde ich auch vorbei kommen und nachschauen.
SammysHP (2018-03-17 10:33:09+00:00): Ist eindeutig eine Mautsäule. Könntest du den Eintrag bitte korrigieren?
SammysHP (2018-03-18 17:47:45+00:00): So, habe den Blitzer in eine Mautsäule umgemappt.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:06:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
ent8r (2018-03-02 16:24:50+00:00): Wofür hast du denn "width=-1" hinzugefügt? Das macht irgendwie keinen Sinn... Hab es mal wieder entfernt...
ent8r (2018-03-02 16:25:48+00:00): Außerdem sollte es eher "highway=track" anstelle von "highway=path" sein. (Hab ich auch schon behoben...)
Gerhard1199 (2018-03-17 16:23:26+00:00): Danke
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
archie (2018-03-02 09:45:25+00:00): Lägg märke till att addr:*-tags inte får vara på "unclosed ways", dvs på vägar. Addr:*-tags på vägar ger felmeddelanden i kvalitesgranskningsverktyg som Osmose etc. Se även här: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
tahasin (2018-11-29 01:41:31+00:00): Hi adiatmad,

While working on this area, i came across the road geometry fixed by you which seems to be incorrect.

Configuration here should be round about continuing with a split road.

Please look into these edits and confirm.

Thanks,
tahasin.
Adiatma IRM-RV (2018-11-29 04:18:08+00:00): Hi tahasin,

Thank you for contact me about my edit. Please correct my edit as long as you can verify it. Also please specify your edit activity at changeset because I can not spot which edit you mean. Do not hesitate to contact another editor to keep in touch. Happy mapping!

Best regards.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:07:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
ent8r (2018-03-02 16:22:23+00:00): Ist das eher eine Straße oder trotzdem nur ein Weg?
Gerhard1199 (2018-03-23 13:19:09+00:00): Das ist nur ein Feldweg mit dem uralten Ortsüblichen Namen "Steinstraße"
ent8r (2018-03-23 13:23:16+00:00): Gut. Dann scheint alles richtig zu sein.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:08:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:08:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:08:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:08:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:08:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:08:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:08:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Digne (2018-03-02 17:03:10+00:00): Hello Meifesto,

I took a look at this changeset, as feedback was requested. I see no problem with the removal.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:00:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:18:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:18:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:18:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:18:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:18:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Mike Baggaley (2018-03-05 17:13:04+00:00): HI welcome to OpenStreetMap. Hope you don't mind me commenting, but the name field should only contain a proper noun, and should not contain any descriptive information. If a feature has no name by which it is known, p[lease leave the name field blank.

I have removed the names "Shared access" and "Forestry Commission access road".

Regards,
Mike
Globalforester (2018-03-05 18:58:01+00:00): Hi Mike - I guess this is my first foray into OSM and I did not spot clear guidance on the use of that field. Based on your guidance, technically I should have used "Donview access" instead of "Shared access" although the latter is the legal entity on the deeds. 
Cheers
Nick
corfede (2018-03-09 13:24:07+00:00): Modificare i fabbricati importati dalla CTR Puglia adattandoli alle deformate e disallineate foto satellitari non è corretto e comporta il doppio lavoro di dover riaggiustare la situazione.
Jakka (2018-03-02 13:15:14+00:00): Standard bicycle are not allowed on highway=footway. If highway=path then all non motorised vehicles are allowed then ....
nhawk (2018-03-02 13:16:56+00:00): Thanks for clarifying! The editor said "not specified" for bicycle but "no" for motorised vehicles, that's why I made it explicit.
Jakka (2018-03-02 13:26:04+00:00): That not a problem. With the extra tag its confirmed.I use this schema to find my way..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Eimai/Belgian_Roads#Paths
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:24:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:20:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
nevw (2018-03-04 11:04:40+00:00): Hi Bknomad
Could you elaborate a little about this attraction.