piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
santamariense (2018-11-12 23:51:08+00:00): Olá. Que legal, a maioria das pessoas que usam o Maps.me não costumam responder a e-mails e talvez nem sequer olhem. Tudo bem, se existem faz todo sentido estar no mapa, porém, não com informações do teu ponto de vista ("clientes") mas sim informações genéricas públicas (como o endereço do cliente, e o nome da empresa dele). Eu não sei exatamente o que você quis representar, mas o que representou de fato foi ter adicionado 41 lojas que tem nome "Clientes" e que vendem bebidas nesta área. E também uma loja que aluga carros e que se chama "Teste". 
.
Essa foi suas modificações nesta changeset: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64266444/
.
Se puder explicar o que está tentando fazer, talvez possamos ajudar. Bem vindo ao OSM, a base de mapas utilizada pelo Maps.Me.
osmviborg (2018-11-07 16:52:41+00:00): Du skulle have slettet den 'highway=turning_circle' som var for enden af Vegavej. Jeg har rettet din opdatering.
Navid Hosseinzadeh (2018-12-08 16:55:03+00:00): سلام لطفا تو انتخاب و تغییر درجه مسیر ها دقت کنید !! راستی اگه تو گروه تلگرام ما نیستید خوشحال میشیم شما رو هم داشته باشیم بینمون. بهم مسیج بدین لینک رو بفرستم براتون.
kubahahaha (2021-09-14 13:29:07+00:00): Cześć, skąd brałeś te budynki. 3a na pewno istnieje? Nie widać go na zdjęciach
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2850611
eggie (2018-11-11 17:23:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
PT-53 (2018-11-22 08:31:53+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
in keep right (wurde mal wieder aktualisiert) werden an der B 311 zw. Oberdischingen und Donaurieden diese Hinweise angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=48.30957&lon=9.85937&zoom=18&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C231%2C232
Du hast da am neuen Kreisel und an der Sdavon abgehenden neuen Straße Layer=1 und an der Brücke Layer=2 ergänzt. Ebenerdige Objekte - wie die meisten Straßen - entsprechen standartmäßig dem Layer 0, der aber nicht angegeben werden braucht. Brücken, die über eine Straße mit Layer=0 führen, erhalten dann Layer=1.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:layer
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße
OF-1 (2018-11-22 12:28:51+00:00): Hallo Peter,
habe die Layerangaben entfernt. Die Fehlermeldungen in JOSM "Überkreuzende Straßen" muss ich eben ignorieren, da mir im Moment nicht bekannt ist welche Straßen/Wege wie weiter geführt werden. Der Verlauf der neuen Straße ist nur grob eingezeichnet. Bei "Construction" sollte diese Fehlermeldung unterdrückt werden.
Grüße
Ottmar
PT-53 (2018-11-22 13:14:39+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
die Fehlermeldungen in JOSM beziehen sich nicht auf den Kreisel und die B 311, die ja mit gemeinsamen Knoten verbunden sind und jetzt auch den gleichen Layer-Wert (0) haben. Auslöser sind 2 Feldwege, die derzeit in OSM noch eingetragen, aber nicht mit der neuen Straßen (zur B 30) verbunden sind und auch keine unterschiedlichen Layer aufweisen. Die Feldwege werden sicher so nicht bestehen bleiben. Da müssen wir halt mal abwarten.
Grüße
Peter
eric_ (2018-11-07 22:32:22+00:00): Hi jambamkin, thanks for your contribution. It isn't an industrial building. It was a retail building before (Harley-Davidson retailer). Could you please consider making this change. Thanks. Eric
jambamkin (2018-11-08 16:50:18+00:00): Thanks for the correction eric_, change now made
sarxos (2018-11-07 17:25:23+00:00): Powinno być "remove duplicated tags" a nie "add duplicated tags".
Nakaner (2018-11-10 14:34:59+00:00): Hall wyo,

was ist die Quelle dieses Änderungssatzes?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64268270
wyo (2018-11-10 16:42:33+00:00): Zum einen ich selber, ich fahre da mindestens einmal die Woche mit dem Motorboot vorbei. Ich habe sicher noch irgendwo ein Foto, muss es aber erst suchen. Zum anderen die "DigitalGlobe Standard imagery". Es gibt zwischen Brücke und Insel insgesamt 7 Bojen, eine davon ist jedoch im Schilf der Insel versteckt. Da diese kaum sichtbar ist habe ich sie nicht gemapt.
atcomapper (2018-11-07 18:23:59+00:00): Her er nu duplikerede adresser da en anden bruger desværre valgte at flytte adressedata over til bygningerne.
Die immer lacht (2018-11-21 16:06:33+00:00): Why have you deleted http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444342963 ?
حبيشان (2018-11-25 14:11:37+00:00): Sorry for late responsive,
I replaced it with node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6044589649
I think using node for harbour is more effective for most map renderers
mavl (2019-02-23 16:35:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
eggie (2018-11-07 18:59:34+00:00): Nu routeert het wel voor auto's maar niet voor fietsers. Is het wellicht een woonerf?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-11-07 19:09:42+00:00): Goede gezien, maar het is geen voetgangersgebied.
Ik zet het om naar een highway=service.. dat komt meer in de richting en kan alles er komen.
Groet,
Eggie
eggie (2018-11-07 19:18:52+00:00): Heb het veranderd in highway=residential. Denk dat je alle straten hier kun veranderen in highway=residential behalve dan waar paaltjes staan en dus pedestrian zijn.
Je hoeft dan niet aan te geven dat er auto's mogen komen. 
Succes
viloan (2018-11-07 18:08:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
rab (2018-11-09 14:04:32+00:00): Hi,
do you map after secret imagery sources?

In Josm zoom in until the scale reads ~ 5m
Draw a 3m line underneath the scale. While the line is still highlighted hit "cntl" + "o". Now you have a circle 3m in diamter. Move this circle over the roads. Only when this circle fits over the complete waylenght, the road can be tagged as "track" or better. In doubt, always tag the next lower classification, or don't map the road/path at all.
eggie (2018-11-07 18:55:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
pitscheplatsch (2018-11-07 18:54:55+00:00): Hi WTPFS, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped highways and areas? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64270605
smaprs (2018-11-07 19:23:23+00:00): Ola, por favor contacte la comunidad Argentina acerca de este proyecto em:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina#Contacto
smaprs (2018-11-07 19:30:43+00:00): És necesario que en otros mapeos en futuro NO se permita que alumnos agreguen objectos duplicados.
smaprs (2018-11-07 19:23:30+00:00): Ola, por favor contacte la comunidad Argentina acerca de este proyecto em:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina#Contacto
smaprs (2018-11-07 19:30:36+00:00): És necesario que en otros mapeos en futuro NO se permita que alumnos agreguen objectos duplicados.
smaprs (2018-11-07 19:23:36+00:00): Ola, por favor contacte la comunidad Argentina acerca de este proyecto em:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina#Contacto
smaprs (2018-11-07 19:30:25+00:00): És necesario que en otros mapeos en futuro NO se permita que alumnos agreguen objectos duplicados.
viloan (2018-11-07 19:11:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Anakil (2018-11-09 12:47:21+00:00): Hi Wajt,
Thanks for contributing ! I saw a small mistake here. The correct tagging for houses is "building=house" ("huis") (not "place=isolated_dwelling").

Happy mapping,
Anakil
user_6110846 (2018-11-09 09:06:20+00:00): це не вірна схема вона морально застаріла є нова схема 
треба type=multypoligon
natural=water
water= та обираєш тип river якшо це назва розгалуження річки
DUGA (2023-01-01 04:41:12+00:00): You park on the road or something?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6044754462/history#map=19/41.37948/-76.28337

BTW this changeset does look like you were importing from an unverified PGC sources, did you really process the data carefully?
ElliottPlack (2023-01-05 03:23:48+00:00): Hi there Mykol404. I didn't see an entry for these parking lots in the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue

Could you provide us with any documentation on this import, e.g., discussions with other mappers, a source dataset, a wiki page, etc.?
--  
Elliott Plack  
OSM Foundation  
Data Working Group
GerdP (2018-11-08 10:55:49+00:00): Hi!
Please try to fix the errors reported by JOSM before you upload the data, There are several ways with duplicated segments and duplicated nodes as well as duplicated objects, e,g. way 641972450 and way 641972482 both describe the same stairs, which probably should be mapped as highway=steps not stairs=yes
Baloo Uriza (2018-11-07 22:43:17+00:00): name should only be the name, not a historical summary.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64271834
Kirdro (2018-11-09 19:08:07+00:00): Gotcha! Thanks for the correction. Locally it's known as the old elementary lot, but it's not officially named.
mavl (2018-11-08 03:15:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 62136164, 62136567, 62137275, 62579951, 62615861, 62616822, 62629431, 62631748, 62671447, 62671821, 62700541, 62701139, 62702141, 62704727, 62738969, 62770581, 62816871, 62828836, 62828964, 62829598, 62829753, 62832575, 62840988, 62843582, 62847953, 62849812, 62849851, 62852717, 62889523, 62890301, 62918690, 62921815, 62922863, 62954104, 62981289, 62983450, 63035368, 63039917, 63042616, 63065178, 63114115, 63132589, 63133263, 63167938, 63170550, 63260297, 63261759, 63346708, 63349492, 63381405, 63383485, 63386759, 63720539, 63723393, 63726576, 63728867, 63768165, 63805458, 63842287, 63877565, 63926986, 63928691, 63935843, 63943204, 63943353, 63943983, 63946407, 63946663, 63946793, 63948860, 63949413, 63952367, 63985674, 64020955, 64043532.
geoaria (2019-02-02 17:35:08+00:00): اتصال بین بزرگراه و آزاداراه روبروی روستا یآب شیرین چون به صورت یک جاده خاکی هست و بین زمین های کشاورزی هست را نمی توان به صورت motorway_link در نظر گرفت . یک جاده خاکی فرعی است . فرض کنید یک مسافر برای خروج از یکی از این دو مسیر توسط نرم افزار به این جاده خاکی هدایت شود
ebraplmap (2019-02-06 17:50:46+00:00): این واقعیت که در زمان ساخت آزادراه خلیج فارس روستای آب شیرین وجود داشته و ساخت زیرگذر و رمپ دسترسی به آن احتمالاً با هدف دسترسی اهالی روستا به آزادراه و توسط سازنده بزرگراه بوجود آمده، دلیلی بود که من برای قراردادن آن درجه بندی استناد کردم، سؤالی که پیش میآید، تابلوهای دسترسی در محل انشعاب وجود دارد؟ سؤال بعدی، آیا حذف تگ یکطرفه از دو میدان داخل روستا تصادفی بوده یا دلیل خاصی داشته؟
geoaria (2019-02-07 04:55:47+00:00): وجود صرف زیرگذر بدین معنا نیست که این محل عبور استاندارد و اصلی در یک آزادراه و یا بزرگراه باشد. به هیچ عنوان یک معبر خاکی در یک آزادراه یا بزرگراه تابلوگزاری نمیشود
ebraplmap (2019-02-07 19:07:53+00:00): بسیار خوب، خیلی ممنون
abrensch (2019-02-17 10:39:23+00:00): Hallo j1scad,

hast Du einen Update zur Sperrung der Saale-Brücke an der Talsperre?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
j1scad (2019-04-11 22:08:04+00:00): Sperrmauer wieder freigegeben

Schöne Grüße
rivermont (2018-11-07 21:19:11+00:00): 30 minutes
eggie (2018-11-07 23:26:14+00:00): review.. helemaal correct zo!
eggie (2018-11-07 23:27:08+00:00): Klopt.. groet, eggie
Mapeiro (2018-11-08 11:45:01+00:00): Please revert your changes. That satellite imagery is outdated. There's no parking lot there anymore. It's now a big construction site.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-11-07 21:03:26+00:00): StGutem, não deve fazer o que fez aqui: passar uma via sobre a outra: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641986931/history
perlywerly (2018-11-07 20:55:32+00:00): Added lane connectivity to complex intersection based on aerial imagery.
GerdP (2018-11-08 06:38:58+00:00): Hi!
I fixed a typo here, please check if I got it right:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64282446
Turleder'n (2018-11-08 06:52:48+00:00): Thanks :-)  Looks fine to me.
GerdP (2019-03-05 08:08:23+00:00): Hi!
Please review building inside building:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641988224
I guess the inner parts are on top of the larger way? If you want to do 3d mapping please check if buildin:part matches:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings
rivermont (2018-11-07 21:19:16+00:00): 21 minutes
Pink Duck (2019-01-06 14:23:08+00:00): There was no need to add an additional node point of interest as nearly all your tags were already on the building closed way. It is up to the various renderers in terms of how they display the data. It is considered a bad thing to map specifically for a particular renderer. It is more useful to tag an area than a point on the ground in terms of dealership retail building.
viloan (2018-11-07 21:15:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
RicoElectrico (2018-11-07 21:41:00+00:00): Dzięki :)

Kiedy ostatnio tam byłem, to jedynie widniało "otwarcie wkrótce". Gdy to nastąpiło, już zapomniałem go dodać.
Polciu (2018-11-08 23:28:39+00:00): Nie ma za co dziękować.
Jak mam czas to zawsze coś naniosę, uaktualnię.
Sławek
mariotomo (2020-02-15 17:07:52+00:00): hola.  estas divisiones administrativas de nivel 10 (barrios) que has añadido en la base de datos tienen el problema de no integrarse con las divisiones administrativas de nivel mayor (8 corregimiento; 6 distrito), en el sentido que no reutilizas los objetos ya presentes en el mapa.  tampoco me está claro si realmente existe la unidad administrativa 'barrio-10', o si es algo informal.

estas dos 'way' son practicamente coincidentes, pero no completamente.

Way: 609801157
  Part of: 
    Relation: Distrito Atalaya (8450549)
    Relation: Distrito Santiago (8465843)

Way: 641998062
  Part of: 
    Relation: san antonio (8900517)

Relation: san antonio (8900517)
  Data Set: 70ec2790
  Edited at: 2018-11-07T21:43:05Z
  Edited by: eliecer caceres (8590104)
  Version: 1
  In changeset: 64274956

si quieres revisar, comentar, gracias.  a mi estos barrios me parecen más ruido que información, y —sobre todo si no hay fronteras bien definidas— creo que más útil tener nodos con place=neighbourhood que estas fronteras que no hay maneras de validar.
derredu (2018-11-09 09:55:05+00:00): Hallo ocrho, du hast an diesem Gebäude:
https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/283018836
ein "bicycle = yes" getagt. Kannst du mir erklären warum?
VG derredu
ocrho (2018-11-11 15:52:47+00:00): Hallo derredu,

ich habe "wheelchair" auf yes gestellt und einen Wikipedia-Link hergestellt. bicycle habe ich nicht editiert soweit ich mich erinnern kann und zumindest ist es auch nicht im verlinkten https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/283018836 

Wenn ich das richtig überblicke (ich arbeite überwiegend mit dem iOS-App, dann hat Aleks-Berlin das hinzugefügt). 

Ich habe bicycle jetzt herausgenommen - damit ich für die kommende Woche den Kopf frei habe.

Viele Grüße, 
ocrho
derredu (2018-11-11 20:00:18+00:00): Danke schön!
DressyPear4 (2018-11-08 14:45:11+00:00): Caro Klenner, linhas são divididas pois a mesma pode fazer parte duas ou mais relações, evitando sobreposições das mesmas. Ao unir - las você acaba quebrando essas relações. Prova disso pode verificar no renderizador que você acabou "secando" o rio Xingu.
eggie (2018-11-07 23:12:59+00:00): Nee  :)

Water op land mag absoluut niet al lijkt het al snel goed op deze standaardkaart. Ik zal even kijken. In het begin loop je al snel tegen grenzen aan omdat je gewoon niet genoeg van de hoed en de rand weet. Water ligt op de meeste kaarten altijd boven. Waarschijnlijk is het een duiker?  En kun je dat taggen als lijn element waterway=canal , tunnel=culvert layer=-1
Een culvert zie je ook wel eens als vlak, maar dat is niet volgens de afspraak.
eggie (2018-11-07 23:22:42+00:00): Ik zou het weghalen en dan op een lijnelement..
waterway=canal
tunnel=culvert
layer=-1

Canal rendert redelijk breed en dan ook nog als tunnel. 

Dat covered=yes heeft geen effect bij een vlak en water ligt altijd boven. Lees ook maar eens de discussie op het forum over aquaducten.
eggie (2018-11-07 23:24:26+00:00): Wanneer je er met een boot onderdoor kunt kun je de maten nog aangeven en boat=yes
Russ McD (2022-12-19 11:15:07+00:00): webrian - Would you check that after adding the Nam Gniap reservoir outline, you have included within it, some pre-existing roads (assuming I have got the edit history correct).
Surely these should now be deleted ?
Rgds, Russ
mike140 (2019-05-04 16:18:45+00:00): Тут -https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/626001868 - не стоило морочиться с мультиполигоном - он был с ошибкой - я восстановил как было
literan (2018-11-08 19:25:57+00:00): не надо выдумывать скверы. покемоны не придут.
Sirrusu (2018-11-08 19:37:30+00:00): понимаю вашу паранойю) но сквер дейстивтельно есть и был всегда, с девяностых точно: посмотрите на спутнике или в том же просмотре улиц. даже на гуглкартах он выделен как зелёная зона.
literan (2018-11-08 20:18:02+00:00): а теперь пойдите в вики, и почитайте, чем leisure=park отличается от "зеленой зоны"
Sirrusu (2018-11-08 20:45:43+00:00): Почитала вики по проекту. Всё ещё не понимаю, где долблюсь в глаза, вроде всё соответствует определениям. Подскажите, пожалуйста.
literan (2018-11-09 08:36:56+00:00): leisure=park: A park is an area of open space provided for recreational use. Т.е. это не зеленые насаждения (в Новом Уренгое я видел парк, в котором ничего не растет в силу естественных причин), а территория, предназначенная для использования в рекреационных целях. Если вы дадите мне пруф (ну, скажем, данные на сайте правительства Москвы или округа, что это действительно парк, у него есть администрация, на него отдельно выделяют средства в бюджете, там поименовано название, которое вы внесли) - я буду готов признать вашу правоту. А просто озелененные территории, даже с дорожками и лавками, равно как и дворы - в понятиях OSM парками не являются.
Sirrusu (2018-11-09 18:30:53+00:00): Окей, доходчиво. Если основной критерий — это выделение парка как отдельной административной единицы, вы правы. В таком случае, постараюсь чекать инфу тщательнее и изменю ещё пару подобных объёктов в районе, во избежание путаницы. Спасибо!)
literan (2018-11-10 12:24:27+00:00): Нет, основной критерий - это provided for recreational use. Выделение как административной единицы - это один из возможных пруфов, которые я предложил вам представить. Кстати, увидел, вы удалили полигон сквера напротив платформы Бескудниково - я там сам не был, но мне говорили, что этой осенью там действительно сделали небольшой парк. У вас другая информация?
viloan (2018-11-07 22:36:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
conradt (2018-11-07 22:41:34+00:00): Mapped all buildings in cell
perlywerly (2018-11-07 22:52:01+00:00): Added missing service road.
abrensch (2018-11-11 13:22:48+00:00): Hallo Gulliei,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Ich habe eine Deiner Aenderungen rueckgaengig gemacht, da hast Du "access=ja" an die Bundesstrasse geschrieben. Damit wäre sie gsperrt, denn "ja" ist kein gültiger Wert. access-Werte werden generell nur in Ausnahmefällen gebraucht, gewöhlich reichen die gültigen Default-Werte

Gruss, Arndt
hadry (2018-11-08 06:40:42+00:00): Hi Warin,

Thank you for cleaning this up.

I just see one issue with a segment of the moved bits of track: the Collie detour is part of the main route (https://www.mundabiddi.org.au).
So I feel it should also be part of the main Munda Biddi relation, even if it is effectively a double back.

Cheers,

hadry
Warin61 (2018-11-08 08:31:39+00:00): Hi,
It is a little housekeeping. 

The Collie connection is a 'spur' - out and back. By placing it separate to the rest of the main track it does make it easier to maintain as a continuous ordered group of ways. 

I'm not too fussed about it other than the maintenance issue.
Warin61 (2018-11-08 08:34:02+00:00): PS It does present nicely on https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=5810814