piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dinamik (2018-08-28 12:18:32+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:51:15+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:17:41+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
assenizator0 (2018-08-18 15:06:19+00:00): You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
Dinamik (2018-08-28 12:18:24+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:51:09+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:17:11+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
A67-A67 (2018-08-19 17:09:35+00:00): De gebouwen stonden goed in Openstreetmap. Ze zijn geïmporteerd uit de BAG (Basisadministratie Gebouwen en Adressen). Je hebt de gebouwen nu uitgelijnd met de daken i.p.v. de begane grond. Doordat luchtfoto's nooit exact van boven zijn genomen, zijn de daken een klein beetje verschoven ten opzichte van de locatie van het gebouw.
A67-A67 (2018-08-19 17:11:12+00:00): Ik heb het hersteld: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61799087
Arucard (2018-12-06 08:14:05+00:00): Bedankt voor het herstellen, ik wist inderdaad niet dat dit al uit een officiele bron kwam.
R0bst3r (2018-10-12 11:13:44+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
tux67 hat im Forum eine OT-Query zur Prüfung von maxspeed:type Werten veröffentlicht: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/CHi
Dabei sind mir im Süden von BW bei Riedlingen ein paar Changesets mit einem Tippfehler von dir aufgefallen. 
Magst du dir die anschauen? 
Danke und Gruß!
PT-53 (2018-10-12 12:09:21+00:00): Erledigt.
Danke für den Hinweis.
Grüße
kapazao (2018-08-18 11:25:47+00:00): why did you say that those areas are made for Pokémon? I don't see a relation and your edits are not related with the comment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61765211
highflyer74 (2018-08-19 13:39:05+00:00): Moin!

Wenn die Lage jetzt durch Dich korrigiert wurde, sei so nett, auch das fixme=* zu entfernen, damit der nächste Mapper nicht denkt, dass die Lage noch immer nicht richtig ist. Danke!
SirKingIke (2018-08-19 16:39:51+00:00): Moin!
Hab ich übersehen, ist entfernt.
Echo78 (2018-08-18 22:28:39+00:00): Добрый вечер. Ну вот, хоть кто-то начал порядок в Ялте наводить ;). Поеду сюда в сентябре (править при этом не смогу, могу только заметки создавать, точки и делать наброски в навигаторе - GPX). 

А туалет снова работает? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2312980582
Something B (2018-08-18 22:36:30+00:00): Доброй ночи (или утра)! Если бы мне было известно, что туалет работает - было бы без abandoned. А так не знаю.
Echo78 (2018-08-18 23:01:08+00:00): Год назад - не работал. Сейчас показалось, что abandoned стёрли. Пора спать...
Something B (2018-08-19 10:54:40+00:00): P. S. Если будет свободное время, можете посмотреть мои заметки.
dval (2019-09-10 17:22:56+00:00): Здравствуйте, Легион196! Здесь Вы нарисовали улицы с именами и highway=service/track. Оба варианта мало подходящи: валидатор http://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-SVE считает это ошибкой. Лучше residential.
assenizator0 (2018-08-18 15:06:27+00:00): You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
Dinamik (2018-08-28 12:18:18+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:51:02+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:15:06+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
assenizator0 (2018-08-18 15:06:35+00:00): You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
Dinamik (2018-08-28 12:18:13+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:50:54+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:13:28+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
assenizator0 (2018-08-18 15:06:44+00:00): You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
Dinamik (2018-08-28 12:18:06+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:50:48+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:11:38+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
assenizator0 (2018-08-18 15:06:54+00:00): You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
Dinamik (2018-08-28 12:17:58+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:50:39+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:09:01+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
assenizator0 (2018-08-18 15:07:03+00:00): You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
Dinamik (2018-08-28 12:17:51+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:50:23+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:08:36+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:50:11+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:08:18+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Ka6a (2018-08-20 13:50:12+00:00): И не должно ничего строиться!!! Всегда все ездят кругом по асфальту! Тут утонуть можно!
Leo Slager (2018-08-18 20:57:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
assenizator0 (2018-08-18 15:07:21+00:00): You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
Dinamik (2018-08-28 12:17:43+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:50:03+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:07:36+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
assenizator0 (2018-08-18 15:07:30+00:00): You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
Dinamik (2018-08-28 12:17:37+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:49:55+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:07:07+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
abakus_uploader (2018-08-18 22:30:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Anazaar (2018-11-09 12:17:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453084549/history

Na jakiej podstawie zmieniono ten fragment na drogę?
Anazaar (2018-11-09 18:35:57+00:00): Ich denke, dass es eine merkwürdige Veränderung gegeben hat? Gibt es einen aktuellen Status? Auf welcher Grundlage hat sich dieser Teil auf der Straße verändert?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453084549/history#map=16/52.1042/15.4748
Ze0zohk1 (2018-08-18 10:30:07+00:00): Bezüglich der Hindenburghütte: Die Hütte selber ist abgeschlossen, aber es existiert noch ein Unterstand. Nun habe ich mich gefragt, wie man diese Konstellation am besten taggt: bekommt das Gebäude oder das Shelter den name-Tag? Kann man den surface-Tag so verwenden?
dktue (2018-08-18 11:04:00+00:00): Ich denke man könnte hier die Geometrie mappen und den Unterstand dann separat mit Tags versehen.
assenizator0 (2018-08-18 15:07:46+00:00): You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
Dinamik (2018-08-28 12:17:31+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:49:38+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 21:06:32+00:00): see comments here: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/61766931
assenizator0 (2018-08-18 15:08:03+00:00): You pervert the names of water bodies. You begining the war of edits.

If you do not stop I'll have to contact DWG. The report about your wrecking activities has already been sent.
woodpeck (2018-08-19 15:28:20+00:00): Dear Dinamik, could you please explain why you have added the word "озеро" to the names of these lakes. It does not seem to be a part of the the proper name?

Also, please use real changeset comments (an appropriate changeset comment here would have been "change the names of Вуокса and Судаковское"). The comment "Leningradskaya Oblast" is useless because it does not describe your intentions and doesn't help anyone reviewing your edits. (Of course you may write your changeset comments in Russian if you edit in Russia.)
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-20 22:01:02+00:00): at first "Don't tag for the renderer"(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer)

secondly. let us not to misinform them - there was never any agreement on compulsory writing of a generic name with a proper name in the russian community. incorrect information was entered on the indicated pages by the user cannabis from the words of the user AMDmi3 about how he does it. no discussions at this point was not. attempts to legalize the data entry to be beautifully displayed on the map, through discussions ended with nothing. moreover, the majority of active participants both in the forum and in the telegram chat are against this practice.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-20 22:05:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-20 22:14:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C&diff=next&oldid=796220
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU%3A%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C&type=revision&diff=796218&oldid=793601
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=RU%3ATag%3Anatural%3Dwater&type=revision&diff=796228&oldid=777632
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=264929#p264929
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 00:31:29+00:00): "озеро Вуокса" and "Судаковское озеро" NOT CORRECTED form of name. corrected form is "Вуокса" and "Судаковское" ONLY.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 00:35:07+00:00): используя родовые имена вместе с именем собственным, ты во-первых вводишь в заблуждение о том, как водный объект называется на самом деле. и во вторых, делаешь невозможной обработку данных по этомк признаку сторонними сервисами.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 00:36:10+00:00): using generic names along with the proper name, you first mislead about how the water object is actually called. and secondly, you make it impossible to process data on this basis by third-party services.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 00:40:47+00:00): In addition, if you incorrectly place local or alternative names in the main tag for names, you are also misleading about the actual name of the object and information is lost as to what type these names are. moreover - this or that object, may not have names other than local or alternative and this should also be indicated.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 00:45:30+00:00): on this basis the database is assenized. and you return the data back to the dirty state, incorrectly naming it "stable version". =/
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 00:49:59+00:00): я много лет занимаюсь наименованиями водных объектов. работаю с огромным числом источников. и в отличие от подобных тебе не вношу данные по желанию левой пятки, а привожу их в порядок.

i have been engaged in the names of water bodies for many years. i work with a huge number of sources. and unlike the like you do not contribute data at the request of the left heel, and put them in order.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 00:53:02+00:00): во всех базах, а до этого списках топонимов - отдельно указывается наименование и отдельно его тип. а уже в процессе обработки этих данных формируется подпись для того или иного объекта.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 00:53:50+00:00): in all databases, and before that lists of place names - the name and its type are separately indicated. and already in the process of processing these data, a signature is formed for this or that object.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 00:55:36+00:00): OSM is primarily a data set, but certainly not a map.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 00:58:06+00:00): и тебе с твоими взглядами надо отправляться, либо в викимапию, либо в НЯК.

and you need to go with your views, either to the wikimapia or to the YMP.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 00:59:12+00:00): dixi
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 04:01:37+00:00): описался. не родовое наименование, а родовое слово, конечно же.

i  errated. not a generic name, but a generic word, of course.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 15:10:12+00:00): lake Судаковcкое is named "Судаковcкое", but not "Судаковcкое озеро". ONLY.

legitimate source: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/8456895 #2995
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 15:28:57+00:00): when discussing this issue in a telegram chat, many of the most active participants of the OSM speak out against inclusion with the name of their own generic word, if it is not part of the proper name.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 15:33:57+00:00): allegedly "hydrographic tradition" follows from the instructions for the designation of elements of hydrography on maps. no more. but at the same time, a GENERIC WORD IS NOT A PART OF THE PROPER NAME INDICATED BEFORE NAME and in the form of a reduction.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 15:34:13+00:00): but the OSM is not a map.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 15:37:11+00:00): with you it is impossible, that either to discuss, because if something white you will persistently prove that it is black. simply because you can not see otherwise.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 15:39:44+00:00): and I repeat (and emphasize this):
using generic names along with the proper name, you first mislead about how the water object is actually called. and secondly, you make it impossible to process data on this basis by third-party services.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 15:40:56+00:00): heck. again i'm errated.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 16:23:48+00:00): woodpeck, do you have something to say?
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 18:12:52+00:00): woodpeck, neither here, nor in other edits of this user, "озеро" is not part of the name.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-21 18:28:31+00:00): here is an example from my practice of collecting local toponyms of water bodies (hydronyms). for example this lake: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42606880, to my question "what is this lake called" all the answers were "Щучье"("Shchuch'ye"), not "Щучье озеро" and not "озеро Щучье".
Dinamik (2018-08-22 06:35:31+00:00): This is an official list of objects - it follows some specific rules due to sorting necessity. Are you really want to say, that, for example, "Белое 4" is normal name?). Perhaps, the issue is in used terminology? When you say "generic word" it looks like some separate word, but if you say "status part", it will look more "closer". Russian toponyms consist of main part, status part, numerical order and explaining word. Construction of full name depends on unique tradition of each toponym - so it can be done only in manual mode and full name consist of all parts, which are included to name. Many people found agreements with me during work in joint projects: local and global, temporarily and permanent - why do you think, that you are the single, who can't do it? You shouldn't think so badly about you. In any case, I have a fab fabulous idea: you can ask any of your many friends in social networks, whom you are  several times made reference to, to conduct the discussion. You emphasized that giving name "Судаковское озеро" to Судаковское озеро is misleading, but it is inclear, why. Could you, please, explain tasks of your third-based service and principles of work? I suppose, that the solutions can be found (for example, supressing of "unwanted" word in post-processing, using tags sorting_name, gvr:code and others). Answers for your questions about lake correlate with the questions. For example, if you ask people "What is this prospekt called?" (asking about Nevskiy prospekt - big street in St. Petersburg), they will answer you "Nevskiy" to shorten the answer, because you previously showed you knowledge about prospekt. If you ask "What is this passage called?", they will answer you "Nevskiy prospekt". So we should appreciate answers for question "What is it?" or "What is this waterbody called?" P. S. Артём Крюковский, let me repeat: tradition/agreement about names of waterbodies was reached and marked not yesterday, not month ago and even not year ago. Many years peoples used it - discussion is necessary for changing tradition. If you have so many supporters, it shouldn't be a problem. But you continue to claim agreement as unlawful and continue bellicose actions for changing names and deletion information about agreement reached.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-23 12:35:45+00:00): woodpeck?
Dinamik (2018-08-29 13:06:38+00:00): Артём Крюковский, are planning to give answers or you are just planning to write comments to me in automatic mode? I've asked you to cancel your automatic edits of hundreds of waterbodies and start discussion essentially. My insignificant manual reverts to stable versions of objects are a drop in the bucket. It is normal situation in joint projects, when objects are reverted to stable versions during discussions. And I ask you once more: please, describe the problems with you OSM-origin base. I think, it can be solved not but cutting OSM-base, but by normal post-processing during import.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 19:35:52+00:00): this not "stable". this bullshiting of toponims. you edits for render, not for dataset. you must gone from OSM.
Dinamik (2018-08-30 06:00:34+00:00): As I remember, I've already told, that "stable" in joint projects doesn't mean "ideal" or "the best": it means "version before active controversy". If this "bullshited" version existed long time, it will be not a big deal if it is around few weeks more in such state during discussion. If we say, that multiply edits of hundreds of objects during a few days with name changing and without preliminary discussion is normal, we will make base unstable. Banishment of opponent from project is not a solution, the solution is desire of finding consensus. Please, describe your problems with importing from OSM for finding appropriate algorithms/tags.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:49:27+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 19:37:49+00:00): Adding of normal/common/natural name is not a tagging for render. Tag name is designated, curios to relate, for name. P. S. You wrote several hundreds comments "Edits for render" during a few hours. Shouldn't one detailed answer from human be better than several hundreds automatically written identical short phrases?
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-31 19:51:04+00:00): you corrupt the proper name. especially for render of osm.org
Dinamik (2018-08-31 23:18:48+00:00): I think, that there are more reasons to say, that you try to move database to some specific state, which corresponds to your special exporting software, because you use non-standard variant of tagging. Let's try to find appropriate algorithm, which allows to export data without neccessity to modifying it. Please, describe your software and technical problems.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-31 23:46:13+00:00): I do not export. I improve tagging and correct errors in the data. In addition, I am adding new data to the fact that OSM is a data set that is used by many different people for various purposes and that the data must be entered so as to help them with this with minimal effort on their part without resorting to refined methods or refusing to use data , because it is impossible to do so. and this is not to mention the fact that the data entered must be as accurate as possible.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 01:30:16+00:00): damn.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 01:32:37+00:00): и это не говоря уже о том, что вносимые данные должны быть максимально насколько это возможно точными.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 01:42:32+00:00): addition for woodpeck and other/

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62103990
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62121918
Dinamik (2018-09-01 20:24:19+00:00): You wrote, that the data must be entered so as to help them with this with minimal effort on their part without resorting to refined methods or refusing to use data, but you separate common name to different tags and propose to glue information from different tags to get normal human-readable name.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 21:20:51+00:00): Yes. Because it will be correct and reflect the reality. Since then the name of the object will not be distorted.

Besides. At least so everyone will see how the river is really called, and those who want to sign it on their map in accordance with Russian standards and traditions will be able to do it. Those who want to use the natural position of words, can also do this with this method, if they want.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 21:24:22+00:00): I do not call to delete always the generic word. You are those cases when it even coincides with the type of object, but is part of the proper name - it must be in the tag name=*. But if this is not part of the proper name, it should not be there.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 21:25:41+00:00): damn. i'm errated.
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-01 21:26:20+00:00): You are those cases -> In those cases
Dinamik (2018-09-07 20:05:25+00:00): I propose to specify, when we can say, that generic word is part of proper name. What can you say about asseveration, that generic word is part of proper name, when name has form of adjective or form of noun in genitive case, and is not part of proper name, when name has form of noun in nominative case?
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-09 09:57:16+00:00): incorrect assertion
Dinamik (2018-09-14 19:57:16+00:00): Could you, please, clarify your objection? Is the reason in fact, that you don't see grammatical difference between name in form of adjective and name in form of noun (you don't feel it by your linguistic intuition)? Or in fact, that you trust only registers with short form of names?
Артём Крюковский (2018-09-17 12:08:44+00:00): you confuse the toponyms with their use. even in the form of a noun, a the toponym can contain a generic word, i.e. consist of a pair of separate nouns. in fact, in the toponymic card only the name in full form is displayed - i.e. If the generic word is not an integral part of the name, the full form of the toponym will not contain it. in the same way in toponymic dictionaries.