piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
oormilavinod (2017-08-08 07:17:58+00:00): hey Rossendale Gary thanks for getting back. i use this link https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/50878288? which flags the chagesets that have been caught by the detectors. here the impossible angle detector caught you edits.
oormilavinod (2017-08-08 04:43:51+00:00): hey Biggerboat!!  welcome to OSM. appreciate you interest in mapping.  I observed that you have pulled a road accidentally causing bad angled roads. I have corrected the errors happy mapping !!
user_5359 (2017-08-26 19:07:37+00:00): Wilkkommen bei OSM! Ein Punkt mit Namen EDV-Dienstleistungsleistungen, die als shop=garten_centre klassifiziert ist? Wäre da nicht ein office=it besser geeignet.

Wenn Du Hilfe bei der Ändeurng benötigst: Du bist willkommen.
highflyer74 (2017-08-06 15:04:35+00:00): Hallo und herzlich willkommen bei OSM!

Wenn Du ein Objekt bearbeitest, schau Dir immer genau alle vorhandenen Tags (Attribute) an. Hier hängen z.B. noch Fahrrad bezogene Dinge dran. Vielleicht kannst Du es selbst anpassen? Wenn nicht, bin ich gern behilflich.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
alphensebezorger (2017-08-10 21:45:44+00:00): Hello Grauer,

Are you aware of the guidelines for automated edits described in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct? I suspect these guidelines might be applicable to this changeset.
It seems unlikely to me that you examined the 1322 'ways' individually, which is -as far as I understand it- required to avoid the rules in this "Code of conduct".
I'm interested in hearing your opinion on this issue.
Grauer (2017-08-11 05:02:49+00:00): Hello alphensebezorger,

Please belief me, I wont destroy the information. I would make the data better. In Osmose roundabout and oneway is selected as mistake.
Thank you for the link automated_etdits. Unfortunately I didn´t know it.
Any idea for me how to reverse the changeset?
I made a mistake, I will correct it.
Grauer (2017-08-11 05:58:02+00:00): Hello again,

The reason I started these changes is the Information in the wiki. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
In the German translation roundabout implies the oneway. In the English Version, the defiation is not so strong like in German.

Best regards
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-05 22:18:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 51764077, 51763240 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mass removal of 'oneway=yes' on roundabouts performed by user Grauer after seeing this flagged on Osmose; after complaints from the Dutch community the user asked DWG to help with revert.
saikabhi (2017-08-10 06:07:42+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Can you review this river: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513273060. Looks like unfinished. 

Thanks
Abhishek
Stereo (2017-08-06 12:14:23+00:00): This is great, thank you!
Maarten Deen (2017-08-06 20:12:20+00:00): Thanks!
highflyer74 (2017-08-07 06:37:03+00:00): Hallo Porfino!

Ich schon wieder ;-)

Achte beim Eintragen von Öffnungszeiten bitte auf die richtige englische Schreibweise (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours).

Viele Grüße!
Bandanas (2017-08-06 15:08:56+00:00): поправочка: лесничество не пуща-водицкое, а межигорское
ivanbranco (2021-06-27 19:26:08+00:00): Ciao cxc,

puoi spiegare meglio cosa intendi con "fixme=NON sono errori.... cmq sono da sistemare"?

Esempio:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5017821002/history
cxc (2021-06-28 09:07:26+00:00): Ciao 
Sono civici da verificare o meglio erano 
Vedo di ripulire un po’ 
Grazie
MrYadro (2017-08-06 17:34:03+00:00): Привет, а чем ты руководствовался при смене level? Так обозначаются Федеральные округа судя по https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative&uselang=en-US
SomeoneElse (2017-08-14 18:28:33+00:00): By what logic do you make https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7449020 a farmyard?  It just looks like a field with some pigs in it to me.
VlIvYur (2017-08-14 23:36:51+00:00): I'd confuse land and yard
JamesKingdom (2017-08-06 11:34:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50882426 where the changeset comment is: Adding features that do not exsist
JamesKingdom (2017-08-06 11:35:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50882441 where the changeset comment is: Adding features that do not exsist
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-08-08 15:48:37+00:00): A miasto? A ulica? Adres to nie tylko numerek domu...
Mapminik (2017-09-01 22:29:29+00:00): Do edycji użyłem StreetComplete, nie wiedząc, że program pyta się także o numery domów bez nazwy. W nowszej wersji chyba pyta też o ulicę, ale musiałbym to jeszcze sprawdzić.
JamesKingdom (2017-08-06 11:33:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50882399 where the changeset comment is: Adding features that do not exsist
JamesKingdom (2017-08-06 11:34:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50882416 where the changeset comment is: Adding features that do not exsist
saikabhi (2017-08-07 05:39:53+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you recheck the park you have added in this changeset?

Thanks
Abhishek
R0bst3r (2017-08-13 19:21:29+00:00): Doubled tagged, removed. See other comments.
eggie (2017-08-06 12:51:25+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-08-06 12:54:32+00:00): Graag de info aan de adresnode toevoegen. name:nl= wordt alleen in Nederland in de prov Friesland toegepast. name= ...de officiële naam.
eggie (2017-08-06 12:57:29+00:00): info op adresnode gezet.
MKnight (2017-08-06 19:09:38+00:00): Moin,
Du hast hier diverse Dinge vereinfacht, die in der Art nicht vereinfacht gehören.
Das betrifft die Kirche, wo Du Anbauten/Gebäudeteil zu einem einzigen Gebäude vereint hast.
Auf dem Sat-Bild sieht man, dass die Version, wie sie vorher war, der Wahrheit am nächsten kommt.
Das selbe gilt für die Tischlerei Braune, wo es recht deutlich ist.
Der dritte Fall ist in der Nähe der Tischlerei, welche man auf dem Sat-Bild schlecht erkennen aber erahnen kann, dass hier die vorige Version näher an der Realität ist.

Kannst Du da etwas sagen dazu?
barberoux (2017-08-07 19:15:11+00:00): Die Kirche wurde von mir erst vor einiger Zeit an der richtigen Stelle erstellt. Sie bestand aus Linien plus Flächen, was von mir nicht so beabsichtigt war (Sah bei OsmAnd auch sehr komisch aus). Dies habe ich korrigiert, dabei habe ich mich daran orientiert, wie andere Kirche eingetragen wurden, die ebenfalls nur aus einem Gebäudeumriss bestehen und deren Gebäudeteile nicht separat eingetragen sind. Bei den erkennbaren Dächern, handelt es sich einfach um unterschiedlich hohe Gebäudeteile, nicht aber um separate Anbauten.
Bei der Tischlerei Braune bestand das selbe Problem mit den Linien. Es handelt sich hierbei zwar um verschiedene Bauabschnitten, diese werden jedoch ale eine gemeinsame Werkstatt genutzt.
Kleine Frage noch am Rande, wie kann ich die ältere Version der Kartendaten mir anschauen? Ist dies mit iD möglich?
MKnight (2017-08-07 20:00:31+00:00): Die älteren Versionen kannst Du dir rudimentär mit achavi anschauen:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50883776
Übersichtlicher ist ein lokales Revert mit JOSM (mit reverterplugin), in iD geht das nicht.

Inhaltlich äussere ich mich morgen nochmal, muss grad los.
MKnight (2017-08-08 19:00:04+00:00): Moin, die Änderungen an der Tischlerei habe ich eben zurückgesetzt, da die vorige Version detailgetreuer ist.

Ich habe es mir noch einmal angeschaut und denke, dass es an der Kirche auch zurückgesetzt werden sollte, da Detailinformationen verloren gegangen sind.

Gebäudeteile werden bspw.von der f4-Map gerendert, diese fehlen hier. Ein Beispiel, wie so etwas aussehen kann: 
http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=50.9812628&lon=11.3293008&zoom=20&camera.theta=54.686&camera.phi=-28.934
Das würde mit 1-teiligen Umrissen nicht funktionieren.
barberoux (2017-08-08 19:23:21+00:00): Hallo, entferne dann bitte die Doppellinie, die man in diesem Fall bei Openstreetmap sieht und die Apsis müsste in dem Fall dann auch noch korrekt eingetragen werden, da der Kreis in das Kirchenschiff ragt.
MKnight (2017-08-08 20:04:33+00:00): Moin, damit ich Dich richtig verstehe:
- die Apsis ist egtl. ein Halbkreis, korrekt?
- was meinst Du mit Doppellinie?
barberoux (2017-08-08 20:22:55+00:00): - Das mit der Apsis ist korrekt
- Bei der Darstellung der Gebäude in der Karte werden die Gebäude als Fläche gezeichnet und zusätzlich werden Linien eingezeichnet. Zurzeit sehe ich das schon wieder bei der Darstellung der Nr. 4 neben der Tischlerei.
MKnight (2017-08-08 20:38:49+00:00): Ah sehe das Problem, da hab ich Mist gebaut. Die Kirche hab ich gerade hochgeladen, die Nummer 4 korrigiere ich.
barberoux (2017-08-09 19:58:08+00:00): Hallo, die Kirche wird aus irgendeinem Grund nicht korrekt dargestellt. Sowohl die Farbgebung stimmt nicht, als auch das Kreuz fehlen. Kann man da noch etwas machen?
MKnight (2017-08-09 21:06:33+00:00): Ja die eigentliche Eigenschaft (place of worship fehlte)
Sollte nun gehen.
Constable (2017-08-11 16:15:07+00:00): Ciao, guarda che tutti i tratti di strada come questo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251366151 devono essere etichettati come oneway=yes, senò chi usa le varie app per la navigazione rischia di vedersi consigliato di entrare in rotonda contromano.
Per favore correggi quelli che hai aggiunto/modificato.
Grazie
ciao
Constable (2017-08-19 13:01:59+00:00): la mia osservazione è ancora valida; perché non rispondi mai ai commenti delle tue modifiche?
procuste (2017-08-26 15:52:36+00:00): Mi scusi tanto ma non avevo visto i messaggi. Sistemerò le rotonde al più presto.
A presto
Marián Kyral (2017-08-06 19:35:41+00:00): Ahoj,
aby se u čerpací stanice zobrazila i budova, je potřeba přidat tag building=yes. Tu druhou benzinku jsem upravil a trochu doplnil.

Mapování zdar,
Marián
Darth Sidious (2017-08-06 20:30:41+00:00): Ahoj, rozumím, díky.
eggie (2017-08-06 13:40:48+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-08-06 13:43:08+00:00): Probeer altijd een verbindingsnode te maken met een kruisende weg. Die ontbreekt hier.
eggie (2017-08-06 13:45:34+00:00): De verbindingsnode met het fietspad heb ik even toegevoegd.
MarNel1 (2017-08-06 14:50:43+00:00): Dank!
CaptainCrunx (2017-08-06 13:18:29+00:00): #r191
opendcc (2017-08-06 20:00:43+00:00): Hallo.

dieser Springbrunnen, wo soll der genau sein?

Servus
saintam1 (2017-08-07 21:06:18+00:00): Привет,

На уебсайта на Asia Hot Spot, както и на страницата им във фейсбук пише, че
ресторантът скоро бе открит на ул. Ангел Кънчев 35. Вие обаче сте добавили
ресторанта на бул. Гоце Делчев. Да не би да има грешка? Аз лично проверих тази
отсечка на бул. Гоце Делчев миналия месец и там нямаше подобен ресторант.
Сигурен ли сте, че ресторантът е на Гоце Делчев, а не на Ангел Кънчев?

Благодаря
oormilavinod (2017-08-07 07:19:48+00:00): hey stevea!! welcome to OSM. I observed that you have pulled a road causing bad angled roads. please make sure you be little more careful while making edits. I have corrected the errors happy mapping !!
stevea (2017-08-07 15:36:13+00:00): hey, oormilavinod.  I appreciate your welcome, though I've been an OSMer for most of the project (>8 years), I was named Mapper of the Month earlier this year, and presented talks at SOTM-US conferences in 2014 and 2016.

What road, exactly did I "pull?"  I am usually quite careful when I edit, but it is possible I made a mistake with a pulled road.  If you identify it (with a link, not a name), I will fix it, as I am local to this area.

Thanks for calling this to my attention (though I'm still not sure what road is wrong), Steve
iandees (2017-08-07 16:36:39+00:00): Steve, if you look at the changeset via OSMCha (likely the tool that oormilavinod was looking at), you'll see that there's an "impossible angle" tag on the changeset: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/50885732. I suspect they thought you created it, when in fact you just modified the way that has the problem. This is a problem with one of OSMCha's problem detectors and they probably didn't catch that.
stevea (2017-08-07 17:31:08+00:00): Ian, please check your "missives Inbox."
oormilavinod (2017-08-08 03:49:11+00:00): hey stevea thanks for getting back iandees is right,  i went by the  OSMcha that flags the impossible angle. now i understand that the tags were the only ones that was modified by you . I shall look into the history more carefully now. thanks for bringing this to my attention. nice to know about you contribution to OSM. happy mapping
stevea (2017-08-08 18:25:47+00:00): Thanks for everybody's good communication here.  They do put erasers on the ends of pencils, as we all make little errors now and then!  (Don't sweat the small stuff; it's all small stuff).  Happy mapping to you as well, stevea
user_5359 (2017-09-22 15:28:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.

If you need help: You are welcome
Nearo (2017-08-10 13:10:15+00:00): Dear Grauer,

Noticed you recently deleted many 'oneway'-tags from roundabout. While this might be OK for normal highways, I'm not so sure about cycleways. 
For example, you deleted the oneway-tag from the following road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197537357
In the Netherlands, many roundabout+cycleways are oneway streets, but there are many exceptions. Therefore, I think it's useful to include the oneway-tag on roundabouts. Furthermore, I'm not sure whether 'roundabout' implies 'oneway' for cycleways.
What do you think? 

Kind regards,
Nearo
Grauer (2017-08-10 14:08:00+00:00): Hello Nearo,

I found the Information in the wiki. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout 
In the German translation roundabout  implies the oneway. In the English Version, the defiation is not so strong like in German.

In the case I am realy wrong, any idea to fix my fault?

Best regards

Thomas
opendcc (2017-08-06 15:06:43+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap und viel Spaß. 

Bitte bei Gebäude und deren Veränderung darauf achten, dass das Ergebnis rechtwinklig ist (sofern es der Bau ist). Und es gibt auch verschieden genau positionierte Luftbilder - am genausten sind die Bayern DOP80 - und bitte dann auch diese verwenden und nicht mit einem ungenaueren Bild  die Sache 'verbessern'.

Viele Grüße
Lejun (2026-03-15 18:09:10+00:00): Salut, à quoi correspond la note=C+O ?
Bandanas (2017-08-06 15:41:48+00:00): поправочка: лесничество не пуща-водицкое, а межигорское
literan (2017-08-07 13:30:10+00:00): Здравствуйте! обратил внимание, что на части домов вы забыли проставить тег addr:street http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=50887191
literan (2017-08-07 13:12:08+00:00): как это - дорога проходит по зданию?
Валентин Кабанов (2017-08-07 14:39:50+00:00): я не дорисовал интернет пропал. там под зданием арка. Если есть возможность до делайте пожалуйста
Валентин Кабанов (2017-08-07 14:42:30+00:00): Здание отель, не действующее. Ремонт, готовность 90%
literan (2017-08-07 15:47:12+00:00): сделал!
maraf24 (2018-01-07 19:48:17+00:00): Noż...znowu kasowanie istniejących ścieżek. I prawidłowej nawierzchni.
maraf24 (2018-01-07 19:44:01+00:00): Wycofane - usunięcie istniejące drogi.
rarad74 (2017-10-15 19:34:34+00:00): Hello.
Why you delete streets from Suceava city and put some explanation in ( probably) russian language only?
rarad74 (2017-10-15 19:49:05+00:00): Sorry. My mistake. Someone else deleted the streets. I didnt saw from the first time...
hadw (2017-08-07 00:27:36+00:00): The name:en doesn't make sense. I'm also concerned that gesperrt isn't  really part of the name, but is actually meta data.  The fact that it isn't capitalised adds weight to that concern.

There is also no need for name:de if it is the same as name.

If you add name:en, it should be because that name actually appears on a sign at the site (or the place is very famous and the English name is widely known), and is different from name.  Please do not mechanically translate the German name if you don't know the English one.
freebeer (2017-08-08 10:20:52+00:00): I'd guess name:en should be
Hoedinger Tobel (closed)
(sorry for lack of diaeresis on my kezboard layout) or
... (no entry)
MAPS.ME .  'Nuff said.  The user added an attraction (ha ha) which probably should have been a change to the path access -- without knowledge of the area, I cannot say more.  A bollard?  A swing gate?  Private path?  Temporary storm damage?
created_by MAPS.ME ios 7.4.0
Furrfu.
--  Freibier
hadw (2017-08-08 10:26:57+00:00): "(closed)" would be meta data and should not form any part of the name.

(I too think maps.me is harming the map.  Normally maps.me users don't respond to changeset comments, but this user has also posted to a forum. I think I will add a map note as well.)
Highfidelity (2017-08-08 11:05:33+00:00): Hello Freibier and hadw
I am using osm regularly via maps me and wanted to contribute not knowing the conventions. Sorry when I did something wrong. Appreciate your support how to deal with such information inthronisiert future. Fact is that the city has set up a plate that states in German language that the entry to the Hödinger Tobel is not allowed. As this is important information I was looking for a way to add this to the map first at the place wherevthe plate is located and second with relation to the attraction itself. 
Appreciate your guidance
hadw (2017-08-08 11:19:01+00:00): Is this a restriction on entry at this particular point, or is it a restriction on the whole length?  In the latter case, you should add an access=no tag to the main feature.

In the former case, you should add the appropriate barrier=* tag to the point on the way that people are not allowed to pass, and tag that with access=no.  If there is a physical barrier, this is worth mapping, in this way, even if the there is no  access to the whole length.

Without knowing exactly what the situation is, it is difficult to be more precise than that.

What you should never do is to use the name=* tag to describe something.  It should only ever contain the official name.  In many cases that may mean there is no name at all.

You can add note:access=* to the feature explaining more about the notice, and you should also mention the notice in the changeset comments, or in the source tag on the changeset itself.

Although I've not used maps.me, I have seen a lot of cases where it has produced bad mapping.  I think it may work for people who are experienced mappers, but it does seem to have resulted in a lot of need for repair, and a lot of map notes that are not useful.
hadw (2017-08-08 11:27:32+00:00): I notice that most of the Hoedinger Tobel is already mapped as access=no.  It is only the westernmost bit that isn't.  There is also a change from track to path, where the access changes, which I suspect is not real.  As it is on administrative boundary, I think different sources have been used for the two parts.
Highfidelity (2017-08-08 13:57:19+00:00): o.k.
will check how I can Change that.
The plate states that People should not enter the "tobel = valley". No reason is given, but I regarded this as valid for the whole pass. Whill check how I can Change that.
freebeer (2017-08-08 16:12:59+00:00): Hallo all,
The actual attraction within the woods is already mapped since 2012 and appears on OSM from zoomlevel 18.
Node 1825598023 (typed by hand)
The path/track has the same name; three months ago user Micha2307 added the note, roughly translated as ``as of 2017; path closed since 2015'' (so it is not just short-term storm damage as I expected from local experience).
The imagery (Mapbox seems best, == DigitalGlobe Std) shows a track (auto-tire-width, two spurs) to the point where it disappears below the trees and Micha2307 changed the access to no on the path.
Was ist (genau) auf dem Schild geschrieben?
To hadw, I believe this ``attraction'' should really be a sign, an Infotafel, if you will.  I also do not know how accurate the position of the signpost is, whether at the start of the track, or where the access as mapped changes -- and what additional physical barrier may be present if any, but I can believe a change where mapped from track to path into the woods.
User geo-ranger also noted the path was closed in 2016.
User Hifi has just used iD to change this node, so I hope it would be simple to change to tourism=information if it is agreed to be most correct.
That is how I see it from afar...
opendcc (2017-08-06 17:14:37+00:00): Hallo,

das OSM wiki steht als Hilfe für das richtige Taggen bereit. Z.B. fürs Rathaus: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dtownhall (ist aber hier schon erledigt)

Servus
oormilavinod (2017-08-07 07:09:46+00:00): hey ddsaimon!! welcome to OSM. I observed that you have pulled a road causing bad angled roads. please make sure you be little more careful while making edits. I have corrected the errors happy mapping !!
Mike Baggaley (2017-08-07 13:06:58+00:00): Hi, is way 342863745 really named Bus Link? If this is not a proper name, please remove it. If it is, I suggest adding a note to say it really is the name.

Cheers,
Mike
SomeoneElse (2017-08-07 13:28:59+00:00): Yes, it really is called that.
sdoerr (2017-08-07 13:04:07+00:00): I wonder if it would be better to transfer your tags to the already-mapped building?

Also, I think there is a preference in the UK for 'St' rather than 'Saint', but I guess that's a matter of personal preference.
mavl (2017-08-07 17:14:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Проезд удалён напрасно. Если там блоки, то нужно добавлять блоки, а не удалять проезд.  
Этот пакет правок отменён.
borovac (2023-12-27 08:26:00+00:00): Cao,
moze li jedna molbica, da li mozes da proveris adrese u Dimitrija Tucovica ima dosta adresa koje si dodao, a da se ne poklapaju sa podacima iz RGZ-a... Ja sam ostavio tvoje i dodao nodove iz RGZ-a i stavio tag note=Needs survey kako bi mogli da proverimo sporne adrese.
Hvala unapred Borovac
Smajser (2023-12-27 17:28:50+00:00): Nije problem.
Te brojeve sam lično skupljao i u principu nisu imali nikakvu logiku.
Tada su poštari nosili pisma po imenu, a ne po adresi.
Baciću pogled za vikend pa ti javljam.
Ako slučajno zaboravim - slobodno me podseti.
borovac (2023-12-27 17:56:23+00:00): Dogovoreno, izvucicu ti i ostale posto ima za sad 80kom koji se ne poklapaju sa RGZ-ovim podacima.
Ali kad zavrsim import svi adrenih podataka u podunavlju.
Smajser (2023-12-27 19:25:24+00:00): Verovatno će biti problema i u Alaskoj, Bačkoj, Banatskoj .....

Vidi koje ulice trebaju pa ću obići
Smajser (2023-12-31 09:14:59+00:00): Prođoh juče kroz Dimitrija Tucovića i brojevi na kućama su isti kao što su bili.
Pogledao sam na GeoSrbiji i tamo je sve po redu upisano. Ta dva stanja definitvno nisu ista.
E sad ....
borovac (2023-12-31 10:35:44+00:00): OK, hvala…
Nista kada se importuju sve adrese u podunavlju napravicu tabelu sa onim sto je uneseno i sa RGZ podacima pa se dogovaramo dalje da se to prekontrolise.
Postoji mogucnos da su iz RGZ-a dodeli nove brojeve i da ljudi jednostavno nisu zameni brojeve, ali takodje postoji mogucnost da i RGZ ima pogresne podatke.
Smajser (2023-12-31 11:14:07+00:00): No frx. Javi šta treba.

Srećna nova i sve najbolje
borovac (2023-12-31 13:21:07+00:00): Hvala, srecni praznici… 😄
maraf24 (2018-09-28 22:07:56+00:00): Skasowany istniejący prawoskręt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31770093
saikabhi (2017-08-07 05:06:12+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you recheck the park you have drawn? 

Thanks
Abhishek
Alexander-II (2017-08-07 08:34:05+00:00): Даже, если вы отдыхаете на грядках с телефоном в руках, ловя покемонов, то это еще не повод создавать несуществующие объекты. Правку откатываю.
kukułka (2017-08-07 06:31:51+00:00): To jest C16 + dopuszczenie do ruchu rowerów na chodniku a nie C13/16