piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
IpswichMapper (2020-10-26 17:00:32+00:00): Hello, 
thanks for your work.

It seems like you focus on bus routes a lot. I highly recommend you add stops to all bus routes, and this makes it useable in routing applications. Currently, I think only OSMand creates bus routes using openstreetmap data, but in the future many other apps might use it.

I also recommend you add duration, opening_hours, interval & interval:conditional. (Info about these tags can be found on the wiki).

To add interval/duration info & stops, I recommend you use this website:

bustimes.org

It has timetables, so you see the interval, opening hours etc. It also shows the route on a map, which you can follow along as you map the routes in JOSM.

I also have a table of public transport routes in Ipswich, and if they have all the necessary tags:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ipswich#Bus_Routes
IpswichMapper (2020-10-27 16:15:22+00:00): Here are some tips I can give you from your mapping of bus route 59:

Firstly, when you are going to add bus stops to the route, make sure the bus stop has the tag "public_transport=platform" when it has been added to the route. This needs to be done to properly consider the bus route "version 2". Also, if you add "public_transport=platform" to the bus stop as well as as "public_transport:version=2" to the relation, when you add that bus stop to the relation, the "platform" role will automatically be given to that stop. 

Make sure to add duration, interval, interval:conditional and opening_hours to the routes as well.

"opening_hours" marks the time the first bus leaves the first stop to the time the last bus leaves the last stops.

(That being said, opening_hours is probably a disputed tag when it comes to public_transport).
kogutowicz-mano (2023-03-12 14:38:16+00:00): A https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12986/ miért lett building=construction? Az egy elhagyott rom.
vasony (2023-03-12 15:36:03+00:00): 2 év után ki emlékszik?
Most találtam az egy akkiro felmérés képet: "27 lakásos épület kialakítása, meglévő polgári védelmi létesítmény bontása" mi ez ha nem construcion. Igaz a határidő 2010 volt, lassú munkához idő kell.
Persze nem biztos, hogy ez a kép ehhez tartozott.
Jrachi (2020-12-15 08:56:38+00:00): Fixme non si usa così!
Usa piuttosto il tag note:it
Esempio:
note:it="Controllare se il sentiero ha un nome"
[Risposta: i sentieri hanno a volte un soprannome, ma raramente hanno un nome vero e proprio.]
pablitoz (2020-12-15 11:17:30+00:00): grazie
Carto'Cité (2020-11-13 11:27:55+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces contributions.
Ces toilettes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8040698385) semblent placées au milieu de la rue, qui n'est pas une rue piéton. Où se trouvent-elles précisément ?
Antoine de Carto'Cité, projet #CartoTransilien
_Mathieu_ (2021-12-24 17:27:09+00:00): Toutes les contributions de cet utilisateur semblent être des "erreurs", j'ai fait une annulation globale.
gabro00 (2020-10-24 07:17:25+00:00): Újraaszfaltozták? :D
Norbert Somlai (2020-10-24 07:25:48+00:00): Igen. Mást is, de arra még nem jártam. Viszont lassan a Szeged-Mórahalom szakasz egy részét is be lehet jelölni rossz minőségűnek. :(

https://www.facebook.com/mkszeged/posts/3555526331176326
gabro00 (2020-11-21 09:12:36+00:00): Úgy látszik nekiláttak
https://szeged.hu/hirek/38536/ket-hosszu-kulvarosi-kerekparut-is-ujjaszuletik
Norbert Somlai (2020-11-21 09:17:40+00:00): Örülök, végre nem kell Röszke felé kerülnöm, ha nem akarom, hogy kilazuljanak a fogaim. :)
gabro00 (2020-11-21 09:51:36+00:00): Új is épül, igaz kicsit másfelé
http://www.morahalom.hu/elkezdodott_a_morahalom_es_kissor_kozotti_kerekparut_epitese

Úgy látom amit felvettél az csak egy része, van még tovább is vagy 2km:
https://magyarepitok.hu/utepites/2020/09/rekordido-alatt-epult-kerekparut-az-asotthalmi-magyar-szerb-szakaszon
Norbert Somlai (2020-11-21 09:58:34+00:00): Igen, oda is írtam a changesetbe, hogy a másik felén nem jártam, track nélkül meg nem akartam megrajzolni.
flother (2020-10-24 13:32:21+00:00): Hi Myriam,

Thanks for your changes to OpenStreetMap. I've tidied them up a little bit and marked the roads as access=destination — that way your guests can still get to your farm. If you think that's wrong then please do leave a comment and we can try to correct it.
eggie (2021-04-05 06:25:11+00:00): reverted by changeset #102305012
Frans S (2020-10-26 12:29:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92969159
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:49:14+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92969483
mueschel (2020-10-24 10:17:49+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tags on these traffic_signs?
Keys like "traffic_sign:maxweightrating" are not used in other places. You can use the common 'maxweightrating' key here as there is no need for a namespace.

Compare to the very common 'maxspeed' on traffic_sign nodes, we don't use a namespace there either.

Cheers
Jan
mueschel (2020-10-24 16:32:18+00:00): Alright then.
Could you add a short note into the changeset comments? This would it make easier to distinguish mistakes from deliberate tagging choices.

And yes, it would be nice to have this as proposal / discussion on the mailing list.
pio2_122 (2020-10-23 20:34:19+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie są dokonywane zmiany kategorii dróg? Nie jest to przypadkiem nadużywanie tertiary? (dla przypomnienia: „Bardzo często są to drogi powiatowe i utwardzone. Łączą miasta będących siedzibami powiatów z siedzibami gmin i siedzib gmin między sobą. W miastach są to główne drogi międzyosiedlowe, często też używane przez komunikację miejską. Zazwyczaj posiadają klasę G, Z, a wyjątkowo L (lokalne)." za: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce).

Kolejna sprawa to: droga przelotowa przez Młodzieszyn nie bez powodu miała highway=residential -> ruch (w kier. Iłowa i Kamiona miał być kierowany od razu na DK 50, a nie przejeżdżać przez miejscowość i dopiero wjeżdżać na krajówkę - nie bez powodu wybudowano nowe ominięcie tej miejscowości)
eggie (2021-04-04 14:39:40+00:00): reverted by changeset  #102274502
What is your intention with attractions all over the place?
gr eggie
berndw (2020-10-24 16:49:55+00:00): Hallo ALu68

Ich habe da eine Frage zu Deinen letzten Changesets
Warum änderst Du vor dam nach embankment?

Hier ist das wirklich ein Damm, der das Wasser der Flutungsfläche des Baches zurückhalten soll und der Weg läuft nur sekundär darüber. Also ist dam hier korrekt.

Das Gleiche gilt beim vorherigen Changeset, ich kenne beide Bereiche aus eigener Anschauung. Bei eigenen anderen Changesets tendiere ich auch zu dieser Meinung

Es wäre nett, wenn Du solche Änderungen nur nach Begehung und nicht per, schlechtem. Luftbild machen würdest.

Bernd
ALu68 (2020-10-25 08:32:56+00:00): Hallo Bernd,

das Problem sind die deutschen Worte und die englischen Tags.
  der Damm --> embarkment
  der Staudamm --> dam
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embankment_dam
  
Die Bauwerke der Hochwasserschutzanlagen sind keine Staudämme, auch wenn diese das Wasser im Extremfall aufstauen.
Es wäre eher noch ein Wehr, bei dem das Wasser sowohl unerirdisch als auch über der Krone abläuft.

Gruß. Andre
berndw (2020-10-25 09:31:18+00:00): Hallo Andre
vielen Dank für Deine Antwort

Meiner Meinung nach hat sich das bisherige Schema dam/weir und embankment bewährt und sollte beibehalten werden.

Solche/Deine Änderungen aufgrund von Wikibeiträgen und/oder Übersetzungen sind mir suspekt (meine Meinung) und sollten vor Durchführung diskutiert werden, zumindest bei solch großflächigen Massnahmen.

Ich bin aber in soweit flexibel, das ich hier kein Fass aufmache und deine Änderungen nicht korrigiere.

Ich werde die weitere Diskussion, die wahrscheinlich stattfindet, beobachten:

Bernd
Hb- (2021-08-23 08:27:00+00:00): Beim https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92970321 ein ähnliches Problem. Dort wurde vom Dammkörper der https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madbachtalsperre das Tag waterway=dam entfernt und durch dyke auf der Krone ersetzt.  

Deiche befinden sich auf dem flachen Land zum Schutz desselben. Dämme sollen Gewässer aufstauen. Insofern können Hochwasserschutzanlagen durchaus Dämme sein.  Wobei man_made=embankment in OSM einen Straßendamm ohne wasserbaulichen Hauptzweck meint.
Hb- (2021-08-23 15:17:39+00:00): Revertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110099195
eggie (2020-10-23 21:15:29+00:00): Dag Bart,
bicycle en foot=yes is al default op een track. Dat hoef je niet toe te voegen.
tracktype=grade4  hoort bij een onverhard weg. Dus surface=sand.
Wanneer het gravel zou zijn dan is het tracktype=grade2 en wordt als half verhard gezien.

Echte gravel is bijna niet te rijden voor fietsers. Is het geen surface=fine_gravel?
Dat is meer van dat korrelspul.
De tags spreken elkaar dus tegen.
Kijk je nog even?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92970341

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-24 10:12:04+00:00): PB contact
user_5359 (2020-10-24 14:52:52+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag Windows=Windows?
Cascafico (2020-10-27 08:57:51+00:00): Anche la WAY: 519166477 (segnata intermediate) non è più visibile?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92972074
maicolgalante (2020-10-27 16:49:30+00:00): se intendi il sentiero che partiva dalla lapide di Mattia Marin, sì ... ormai non praticato da anni, il sentiero non esiste più
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92972074
Frans S (2020-10-26 09:47:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please use the Maxar Premium Imagery as requisted in the project description.
Bing is much older and whows buildings on locations which are now changed into water areas.
There is no need to map farmland as well.
See this chapter how to choose a background 
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-10-26 10:11:34+00:00): HI . Back again
Please do use the tag Building=yes instaed of building=hut.  (standard tag for these projects)
Also no need to map fences as well.  Just buildings and roads.
I also noticed that you map irrigular fenced areas as a building.
When an object has a shadow on the outside as well on the inside it is no building.  
Best regards
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:47:51+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92972234
blackboxlogic (2020-10-24 13:33:21+00:00): Hi Emmabunks,
I've reviewed and removed all the elements you've added to the map because they seem like personal entries, not verifiable facts about the world. I'll also remove any future elements you add that are in the same style. The program you're using (maps.me) lets you add personal markers without publishing them to the world. That would be a better way to keep personal notes or make a geographic diary. I hope this doesn't ruin your day. Please reply if you have questions.
See: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92988338
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92972656
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:46:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92972742
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:45:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92972837
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:46:19+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92972837
Arturo Francisco Barbero (2026-04-27 12:48:02+00:00): Hola,

¿Cuál es la fuente del nombre alternativo del restaurante La Alcaldesa, "The Mayoress"?

No lo encuentro por ningún lado.

Un saludo,
Arturo
user_1566574 (2020-10-25 10:16:59+00:00): demolished;building=yes, pas demolished=building haha 😂

Tqt, je m'occupe de restaurer le précédent bâtiment (avec son historique) et de corriger ça. 😉
tanonin (2020-10-30 20:27:39+00:00): Ha mince j'en ai fait plusieurs comme ça depuis 😅 tu peux checker avec osmose?
user_1566574 (2020-10-30 20:33:11+00:00): Une requête Overpass sur une période de 3 semaines dans le Doubs ne me donne qu'1 résultat : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71908464/

Moindre mal ! Je te laisse corriger celui-ci ? 😉
tanonin (2020-10-30 21:11:21+00:00): ouep
joost schouppe (2020-11-05 17:22:17+00:00): Hi Nicofo,
Really happy to see your edits in the area! I added a lot of detail recently, but I don't visit very often so I wouldn't find these little paths you've been adding.
I see you also have been adding the French version of the name back to the main name tag. When I was working in the area, I have removed most of these. I don't have strong feelings about this, but the current community consensus is that in facility municipalities the name should be in the main language only. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Language_facilities . If you disagree with that, please join the Belgian mailing list so we can discuss this again. BTW, you can still have a nice map with just the French names if you need that, for example with the Belgian-FR tiles (https://tile.openstreetmap.be/#map=16/50.73969/4.35164) or the French tiles.
Nicofo (2020-11-11 13:15:33+00:00): Hi Joost,
I don't think these paths are new, they were just missing... Happy to contribute
Note that inversely, I'm not sure all the paths between Hof ten Berg and railway really exist (they are across a field ?) I'll try to check next time I'll visit. In the mantime, I have added a 'fix-me' tag for these paths.
Concerning the language, I just followed OSM hint. As both languages are equally indicated on the street boards (Nl - Fr), seems fair to keep it.
Mvg
eggie (2020-10-24 08:36:32+00:00): PB gestuurd..
De drie trappen heb ik goedgelegd volgens de BGT omtrekgericht. 
Die liggen nu 100% goed. 
Dat geeft dan dierct conflcten met paden die er niet kunnen lopen. Dus het middengedeelte en de aansluitingen met de trappen goedgelegd volgens de BGT.
Het pad waar alle bankjes zijn toegevoegd staat niet in de BGT.  
Ook de parallel verbinding richting de bebouwing is er denk ik niet. 
Het wandelpad in het verlengde van de trap en parallel loopt aan de IJdoornlaan ligt nu 100% goed volgens de BGT na correctie.
Het meest westelijke stukje van de tuin staat ook niet in de BGT, maar dat kan natuurlijk ook later zijn aangelegd. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2020-10-24 13:49:57+00:00): typo.. vier trappen liggen nu correct volgens bgt omtrekgericht
Frans S (2020-11-16 14:32:32+00:00): Hello
Please map more accurate. 
See my general PM
Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-06 17:19:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8041097036/history has nature = tree that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Was it supposed to be natural=tree? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree (though maybe it is not a tree anymore?)
gscscnd (2020-10-24 07:16:51+00:00): Nie ma tam żadnego znaku w stylu „teren prywatny”? W czerwcu coś na pewno było.
ZeroJeden (2020-10-24 21:05:25+00:00): heja.
tak, jest tam znak, ale trochęnie rozumiem dlaczego. W danych katastralnych droga publiczna ulica Zbożowa (teren jednoznacznie miejski) i droga między stawami jest na jednej działce. Trudno wyjaśnić w tym kontekście na jakiej podstawie postawiono tam tabliczkę. Zapewne najwłaściwsze byłoby chyba ustawienie dostępu "destination", bo na tabliczce jest też informacja że droga prowadzi do miejsc noclegowych.
pozdrawiam.
Frans S (2020-11-16 14:13:49+00:00): Hello
Thanks fro mapping here
Please map more accurate and squared.
See my separate PM
Best regards
luisforte (2020-10-23 23:02:45+00:00): Hi, Why did you delete the relation type (type=waterway)  to the Tagus River?
luisforte (2020-10-23 23:21:13+00:00): All relations use a tag type, to define the type of relation. Without it relations are meaningless.
Reverted.
hindair (2021-04-03 17:46:58+00:00): In diesem Änderungssatz hast du 2x den Wegweiser von „Chrästel“ an andere Orte kopiert ohne die Attribute anzupassen. Ausserdem waren an den entsprechenden Orten bereits die richtigen Wegweiser vorhanden. Ich dachte, ich informiere dich darüber, bevor ich das wieder lösche.
Gubser Bruno (2021-04-03 23:52:37+00:00): An der Weinbergstrasse/Glärnischweg sind auf Map der Wegweiser Buchs 456m und Chrästel 494 m eingetragen.
Der Wegweiser Chrästel sollte gelöscht werden. An diesem Ort hat es nur 1 Wegweiser. Beim Chrästel ist der Wegweiser richtig eingetragen.
Ich bin für den unterhalt der Wanderwege in Buchs ZH zuständig.
hindair (2021-04-04 18:39:40+00:00): Gut zu wissen, danke 👍 Habe doppelte Wegweiser gelöscht. Schöne Grüsse
hindair (2021-04-04 19:09:09+00:00): Dafür habe ich gestern entdeckt, dass es zu jedem Wegweiser eine Webseite gibt.  zum Beispiel https://maps.zh.ch/system/docs/ww/Wegweiser/67425702.pdf
Ist ja schon ganz toll was wir alles anschauen dürfen 😃
neuhausr (2021-04-12 15:38:28+00:00): Hi, curious how you know the name of this island? I haven't seen it on other maps of the river and when I search online the references are to an island in Panama (or this data). Thanks!
Danil (2020-11-02 03:22:30+00:00): Please be carefull to delete important node such as County placemark
b-jazz (2020-10-31 01:40:02+00:00): Hello Long_496,

I needed to revert this change because it moved a couple of nodes that were part of roads and that moved made the roads be out of whack. Let me know if you need help replacing your changes.
flor!an (2021-09-29 17:21:48+00:00): Ist das wirklich eine Quelle? Oder eher ein Teich?
Wulf4096 (2021-10-05 10:58:24+00:00): Vielleicht eher ein Springbrunnen, siehe im CS verlinkte Quelle.
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:45:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92975224
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:14:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92975249
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:16:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92975249
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:45:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92975311
GinaroZ (2020-11-03 11:46:39+00:00): You seem to have changed farmland and parking into buildings and water in this area - any particular reason for this?
TheMoneyTour (2020-12-15 20:31:16+00:00): For a project Sir.  They need to be reverted.