piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sasha-3003 (2019-07-18 17:12:48+00:00): Не помню. Если я, то отмечаю наверняка. Это было очень давно.
А что дорожников карты говорят?
sasha-3003 (2019-07-18 17:17:57+00:00): Какой конкретно участок? Если в черте города, то там быть не может. В городе только улицы.
4004 (2019-07-20 18:56:07+00:00): вот и мне так показалось. этот участок https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1950157 и дальше до трассы. карты дорожников у меня нет
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
ILikeTownsAndCities (2021-04-22 07:16:28+00:00): Dzień dobry, 
Dziś jechałem do Borowego we województwie lubuskim. Na drodze, osiedla mają na ścianach adresy.
Wszystkie mają Osiedle Czyżówek.
kuhni74 (2026-01-02 15:53:00+00:00): Ist ja schon ein Weilchen her, aber ist Dir noch erinnerlich, woher der Wegverlauf für die Wanderwegrelation Nr.14 stammt? Hier gibt es einige Unklarheiten. Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4633484
kuhni74 (2026-01-02 15:53:27+00:00): bzw. Weg Nr.7
ReinerMeyer (2026-01-02 16:23:49+00:00): Tut mir leid, daß ich nicht weiterhelfen kann. Wanderweg 14 hatte ich nicht angelegt. Daher weiß ich auch nicht, woher die Infos dazu stammen.
Auch den Wanderweg 7 hatte ich nicht angelegt. Auch Veränderungen an den beiden Relationen hatte ich nicht vorgenommen.
kuhni74 (2026-01-02 16:33:07+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung, die Versionsgeschichte ist ein bisschen undurchsichtig. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/BugBuggi dürfte auch beteiligt gewesen sein, aber er war schon länger nicht mehr eingeloggt.
simonschaufi (2024-06-01 22:11:00+00:00): Hi, you put 120 km/h max speed on the A71 but I see 80 signs all over the place. what is your source?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
Morten Lange (2016-01-18 17:54:56+00:00): This way belongs to Bankastræti I think : Bankastræti, (114790874, v2)  ?
ian727 (2024-01-03 15:12:30+00:00): Warum denn service und nicht residential?
atpl_pilot (2024-01-05 12:04:01+00:00): Lieber Kollege, ein gesundes neues Jahr 2024.
Mein Edit ist Jahre her. Du musst mir konkret sagen, welche Straßen du meinst. In Neuruppin hat sich sehr viel geändert in den letzten Jahren.
von mir aus ändere, was Du gern ändern möchtest und sich heute anders darstellt.
Liebe Grüße,
Stefan.
GerdP (2015-11-20 20:07:41+00:00): Hi there!
I found the tag surface=1 on 
this track:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195412587
Do you remember what you wanted to map with that?
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-06-08 22:38:09+00:00): What is this feature here?  It looks like no main road and no water nearby.
legofahrrad (2022-02-18 21:24:04+00:00): Moin! Ich hoffe du liest diese Nachricht.
Hier hast du schon vor langer, langer Zeit etwas geändert. Es sieht danach aus, als hättest du Zugang auf das Gelände der Bremer Stahlwerke gehabt.
Wenn dies so ist (auch immer noch), wäre es super nett, wenn du dir mal die Hinweise auf dem Gelände anschauen könntest, da diese eine Überprüfung vor Ort benötigen.

Zum Beispiel diese Hinweise:
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/62546
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/281315

Viele Grüße!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
b0ssi (2024-03-24 07:32:19+00:00): Hi seth_ze,

there is a note inquiring about the purpose of this marina node that you set and I thought I'd point you toward it to see if you might be able to shed some light on it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4105348

Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
GerdP (2015-10-27 09:28:23+00:00): please review: The way 67478389 
often seems to be very far from any road
according to Bing. 
Should this be an existing way or something that is planned / in construction?
marc__marc (2021-02-25 12:10:07+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195531836
j'ai fusionné les 2 objets qui parlait de la mine mais j'ai un doute à propos du nom :
wikipedia parle d'une mine de Bellezane : 1975-1992, est-ce cella là ? si oui Belzanes ou Bellezane ?
par ailleurs il y a 2 surfaces qui se touchent dans osm. c'était une mine ou 2 ? 
si c'est qu'une seule, les 2 surfaces pourraient être fusionnées.
Pour finir, je me demande ce que représente la zone verte en plein milieu de la voie d'accès que vous avez renseignée.
Cordialement,
Marc
andershl (2019-04-08 11:26:11+00:00): I received an official set of coordinates and elevations for peaks in North East Greenland. Then I noted that for the southernmost part some were already there. Thus this question: What was your data source? In particular for the coordinates. I do not want to spoil anything...
Wololo (2019-04-08 11:57:48+00:00): I've used this list in wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mountains_in_Greenland, but it was some time ago and I don't know if I had the awareness about it being a valid open source or not, some of the data in it seems to be derived from Mapcarta, some other from other sites. I'm sorry for the trouble, but if there was any incorrect usage of data please feel free to revert this edit
andershl (2019-04-08 12:15:17+00:00): Thanks s lot. I shall combine as necessary. As to 'valid open source': Yes I was asked the same question and had to explain...
andershl (2019-04-08 12:21:30+00:00): PS: Thanks for the link to Wikipedia, this can tremendously improve my import set up front. 
Also: Wikipedia is open source, so I would as you have no hesitation in using data from there.
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-06-14 02:03:23+00:00): Hi fbello, i have modified your restriction edits https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/2631013. switched the role to meet the navigable route. in case you wanna validate it, please drop me a message. thank you
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
lololailo (2021-10-02 11:38:13+00:00): Hola, el recorrido del GR 252 ha variado en su paso por Gebas, Alhama de Murcia. Si te parece bien lo edito.
Un saludo
utack (2016-04-08 20:22:37+00:00): Cheers, are these house numbers?
Gumeg (2017-04-26 10:08:14+00:00): ВЫ добавляли много улиц highway=living_street, в частности в Алейск. Данный ключ у объектов применяется, если только у дороги есть знаки 5.21 и 5.22 "Жилая зона". Не могли бы удостовериться в этом? Судя по всему далеко не все улиц соотвествуют этому критерию..
vanomel (2017-04-26 10:15:05+00:00): Привет. Когда я начинал участие в проекте всм единственное требование для этого отеля было то что улица используется жителями для проезда к своему дому. Если есть желание то может исправить на то что вам кажется правильнее
Gumeg (2017-04-26 10:26:07+00:00): Хорошо! Решил в этом городе немного привести улицы в соответствии с текущей практикой и соглашениями. Поставлю этим улицам тег living_street=yes
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:34:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2061925232/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
Tomas_J (2026-03-03 14:23:48+00:00): Zdar, tento pahylik je naozaj cesta III/1667?
Tomas_J (2026-03-03 14:24:08+00:00): ...sorry, este url - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195779116
SomeoneElse (2021-08-13 11:58:40+00:00): Hello Rui Tavares,

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. You added a "source=Google Maps" tag with the hamlet here. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here.
Is it somewhere that you are familiar with?

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2021-08-13 11:58:57+00:00): Olá Rui Tavares,

Espero que não se importe que eu pergunte sobre algo adicionado ao OpenStreetMap 8 anos atrás. Você adicionou uma tag "source = Google Maps" ao hamlet aqui. Na verdade, não podemos usar isso como uma fonte no OSM porque a licença do Google não permite que seja usado aqui.
É algum lugar que você conheça?

Cumprimentos
Andy Townsend, em nome do Grupo de Trabalho de Dados da OSM
luisforte (2021-08-15 22:30:08+00:00): Hi Andy, 
I'm afraid the user Rui Tavares won't reply, in fact he hasn't edited for more than 8 years.
However, I realized that in Portugal there are 22 other references that include "google maps" or "google earth" in the source tag. 
I'll try to validate and correct all, including this one if Rui Tavares doesn't reply in the meantime.
In a couple of weeks I'll tell you the result, Luis
pantufla (2022-01-16 12:31:27+00:00): Hello, how are you sure of the name for this river? name:en	Yuruani
waterway	river
It might be a mistake. Should I delete the name until known?
werner2101 (2022-01-30 08:20:15+00:00): Yes, it might be a mistake, usually I just extended existing rivers back then. Unfortunatelly I don't see, where the name did come from.
I'd add a Note instead of deleting the name or add a FIXME=Check Name.
frosm (2018-10-31 00:58:25+00:00): Bonjour,
vous souvenez-vous pourquoi vous avez spécifier qu'un des bassins dans le
centre nautique est interdit d'accès ?
et plus amusant, interdit aux chevaux et aux véhicules ? les autres sont permis aux chevaux et aux voitures ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1820461288
Jean-Pierre DAVID (2018-10-31 01:19:59+00:00): Bonjour, l'accès a été interdit car le centre nautique avait été victime d'un incendie volontaire.
Pour l'interdiction aux chevaux et aux voitures, j'imagine que c'est par pure discrimination.. ou alors que mon logiciel de cartographie de l'époque me posais cette question lors de l'entrée d'un nouveau POI
frosm (2018-10-31 01:22:22+00:00): ce n'était qu'un bassin qui était interdit ? il l'est toujours ?
Jean-Pierre DAVID (2018-10-31 01:40:18+00:00): Non, tout le complexe était fermé ( https://www.lyoncapitale.fr/actualite/centre-nautique-de-venissieux-incendie-volontaire/ ). Je n'habite plus en France, donc je n'ai pas suivi l'évolution de ce site, mais on dirait qu'il a réouvert : https://www.resa-centre-nautique.fr
mueschel (2019-12-30 16:49:48+00:00): Hi,
I found various 'STAG_*' tags on this park - Are they still meaningful? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2634482

Jan
blackadder (2019-12-30 22:16:13+00:00): They could be changed to something more appropriate. They stem back to a time 12 or more years ago when I was looking to create a new version of the tagging schema which I didnt take further. Some of these tags may have some relevance but certainly they could be reviewed and updated or deleted as required
mueschel (2024-12-28 17:30:24+00:00): Hi,
a long time ago, you added the tag "blue_badge_holders=yes". Isn't that tagged disabled=yes nowadays?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/20841793/history
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-05-26 15:19:13+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=594297#p594297
Andreas Binder (2017-10-24 19:39:24+00:00): In diesem Changeset wurde für die Zugbrücke http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138347308 ein maxheight gesetzt. Gilt maxheight wirklich für die Brücke (und damit für den Zug) und nicht für darunter durchführende Straße?
Hike39 (2017-10-25 14:49:13+00:00): Ich habe maxheight von der Brücke weggenommen. Danke für den Hinweis
Andreas Binder (2017-10-24 19:40:33+00:00): In diesem Changeset wurde für die Zugbrücke http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38322878  ein maxheight gesetzt. Gilt maxheight wirklich für die Brücke (und damit für den Zug) und nicht für darunter durchführende Straße?
Hike39 (2017-10-25 14:47:38+00:00): Habe ich korrigiert. maxheight sollte natürlich nur für die Straße gelten.
Hike39 (2017-10-25 14:47:57+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis
Marc_ch (2022-10-18 19:40:43+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196001196
vous souvenez-vous si c'était bien le batiment de la discothèque Macumba ?
Salutations,
Marc
Sébastien Pi (2025-08-15 17:07:18+00:00): Bonjour Philippe,

Je viens de remarquer que certains name sont incorrects. Il n’y a aucun intérêt à mettre « Maison », « Maisons »,« Immeuble »  ou « Immeubles ».

Pouvez-vous les retirer ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:38:03+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54753999/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
eggie (2023-02-09 12:50:28+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik daarom opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
arvdk (2017-08-11 21:15:41+00:00): See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:internet_access%3Dwlan for correct tagging of wifi point
urk (2026-02-28 16:47:29+00:00): Hi Carsten, ich war vor Tagen in der Sandstr./Altenbruch. Dort hattest du vor 13 Jahren einen Fußweg (id 196195697) separat angelegt, den ich diese Woche so nicht vorgefunden habe. Die Straße schließt re/li vor den Grundstücken mit je einem flachen Rinnsteingebilde ab: ohne Bordsteinkante,regelmäßig von Gullies unterbrochen, unregelmäßig 40-60 cm Breite, oft rechts schmaler als links. Dass hat für mich nicht die Charakteristik von "Bürgersteigen", Auch Kfz parken dort uneingeschränkt. Ich würde das gern wegnehmen und sidewalk=no taggen. 
Siehst du das anders? 
Grüße - Uwe
Carsten Güse (2026-02-28 18:08:18+00:00): Hi Uwe,
anhand meiner GPX-Tracks in Altendorf konnte ich erkennen, dass ich da nicht direkt vor Ort war im Sandweg. Ich habe den Fußweg also nur aus Luftbildern gemappt. Wenn du vor Ort warst kannst du das wesentlich besser abschätzen. Du kannst den separaten Fußweg also gerne löschen.
Viele Grüße
Carsten
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:50:02+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196217406,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196217411,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196217413
have no tags. What are they?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
AntEntro (2018-11-26 09:59:03+00:00): 请问您的数据来源是什么？
MBedilion (2019-01-04 21:55:32+00:00): Hello T99,
I've been adding some turn restricitons around Sacramento and noticed an error was thrown durring validation per a node that you edited back in 2012 (NodeID:2066030655)  (38.7518103, -121.3525463). It looks like u_turn restrictions should belong to the intersection right next to it. Can I go ahead and take care of this for you?
T99 (2019-01-04 22:10:52+00:00): Please go ahead, thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
Endres Pelka (2015-08-19 21:56:24+00:00): I can see you used ref=* for platform numbers, for example in this stop_area: https://www.osm.org/relation/2639054
Actually, there is a tag local_ref=* for platform numbers within one stop_area. It's even rendered by the "Transport Map" layer on OSM main website! Example: https://www.osm.org/#map=18/49.44543/7.76887&layers=T
And ordinary ref=* seems better for more global bus stop identifiers (within one operator, or one region). Please consider retagging.
aTarom (2023-03-08 10:23:30+00:00): Hola Javier,
sé que el changeset es de hace 10 largos años, me puedes decir si el tag
"new"="yes"
es seguro retirarlo de los siguientes elementos? si tiene alguna utilidad ningún problema

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108368/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108378/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108389/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108394/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108399/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108409/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108414/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108420/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108421/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108425/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108430/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108434/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2067108438/history

Saludos y gracias por tu continuo trabajo
SK53 (2018-06-15 16:38:40+00:00): A2 through Carnlough up to where Largy Road rejoins to the N is marked as having a height limit of 3.8m. This seems a little unlikely as I cant see any bridges on the road at all. It also doesnt appear in the NIDirect list of low bridges (although a non-bridge height restriction may exist independently). Any recollection of why you added this? (And sorry for probing mapping from long ago, again).

Jerry

PS By way of explanation I was looking for somewhere with outside data to compare to OSM to provide a handle on completion of low bridge mapping & the NI Direct data was first I came across.
SK53 (2018-06-15 16:42:15+00:00): Not to worry found it! https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/inejYJR3B3RE8TO1KzK0DQ
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
Geofreund1 (2020-07-06 20:37:05+00:00): Es ist zwar eine Weile her, aber vielleicht kannst du dich noch erinnern?
Die Adresse Am Winkel 14, Dessau hast du doppelt eingetragen. Ist das so korrekt?
Bitte mal prüfen.
Gruß
Geofreund1
Nakaner (2020-07-06 21:00:53+00:00): Hallo,

erinnern kann ich mich nicht mehr und seit über 6 Jahren wohne ich dort auch nicht mehr. Ich habe aber (recht zügig) in meinem Archiv das damalige Feldbuch gefunden. Du kannst die betreffende Seite unter https://michreichert.de/share/public/2020-nov-dez-dessau-am-winkel.pdf einsehen. Die Skizze zeigt die Straße "Am Winkel" südlich "Am Achteck". Ddie restliche Umgebung haben ich mit Walking Papers gemappt, aber das war nicht mehr auf dem Blatt.

Schau es dir an und mache dann damit, was du für richtig hältst.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Geofreund1 (2020-07-07 12:03:19+00:00): Die eine HN 14 ist ziemlich deutlich zu erkennen, die andere - direkt daneben - kann ich nur raten. Vermutlich sollte das HN 14a sein, aber vermuten heißt nicht wissen. Also lass' ich es auf sich beruhen.
Trotzdem Danke für deine Mühe.
Gruß
Geofreund1
hadw (2019-05-07 12:50:47+00:00): I'm assuming this was submitted by Pater Page who owns the database rights on those parts of Coventry Maps which aren't OS Open Data, and therefore the licensing is sound, even though the man Coventry Maps page gives a licence that is incompatible with OSM (no commercial use).

However I noticed the tag suspected:designation=public_footpath, on a path at the back of some houses that only seems to service those houses. Such paths are normally access=private, and either owned by the property developer, or to the halfway line, by the bordering properties.

Typically there is an easement for each bordering house allowing it to be used only to access the grounds of that house.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
Matija Nalis (2023-04-01 00:04:19+00:00):  Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site ? Do you have any pointers to documentation of it?
nicolas17 (2023-04-01 00:47:50+00:00): 10 years ago on an unknown HOT task... I have no idea :P

I would need to search for the corresponding HOT tasking manager task to see if it was documented there, or search multiple computers for 10-year-old IRC chat logs in the hope I rambled about it there while mapping...
Matija Nalis (2023-04-01 01:07:25+00:00): Yeah, I guessed it might be a long shot, thanks anyway :) 

Wiki related to HOT I've found do not mention it; but I guess it might've been probably related to  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Haiti/IDPCamps there is no confirmation yet.
SK53 (2023-04-01 12:03:04+00:00): Almost certainly related to this HOT activation; https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/2012-December/002483.html.

Unfortunately task descriptions from earlier instances of the HOT Tasking Manager do not seem to have been archived. Pierzen is the person to ask about this.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:36:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2069542939/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-06 00:32:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 80611229, 80608729 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changesets with Google-sourced edits mainly in Java.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14302164 for details
dieterdreist (2017-04-30 13:30:17+00:00): another changeset where parks have been changed to garden where it doesn't apply, see also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-April/032245.html
aharvey (2015-08-06 08:15:13+00:00): Hi Mike,

What does the 50m mean at Eagles Nest Lookout? It's too low for altitude...