piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2022-09-07 06:17:25+00:00): Hallo Chris,
Du hast in Mietingen-Walpertshofen das Neubaugebiet eingezeichnet, dabei aber den falschen Namen verwendet. Das ist das Neubaugebiet Fuchshalde, wie Du hier nachsehen kannst:
https://www.mietingen.de/de/rathaus-buergerservice/buergerservice/wer-hilft-mir-bei/bebauungsplaene

Ich habe den Namen berichtigt und die Fläche des Baugebietes und die Straßenverläufe anhand des Lageplanes der Gemeinde überarbeitet.

Noch ein Hinweis:
In Mietingen stammen die Bing-Luftbilder aus 2019, die Maxer Premium-Luftbilder sind neuer. Vergleichs mal.

Grüße
PT-53 (2022-09-07 06:43:08+00:00): PS:
Das Neubaugebiet "Hinter den Gärten" liegt hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092538219/history
happy5214 (2022-09-06 18:46:52+00:00): Obviously, I meant "untag", not "delete". The signals were moved to before the intersection in my previous changeset.
limes11 (2022-09-06 21:05:09+00:00): Zurückgesetzt.

Existierende Wege bitte nicht entfernen, Privatgrund spielt dabei keine Rolle. 

Einschränkungen von Betretungsrecht mit access=private kennzeichnen.

Amazon-Fahrer tragen diese Stummel ein, damit sie Häuser besser erreichen.
Polarbear-repair (2022-09-07 08:17:54+00:00): Ich habe den Nutzer noch einmal detailliert informiert. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6335
Wulf4096 (2022-09-07 09:02:01+00:00): Go-on, hast du inzwischen vor Ort Maßnahmen ergriffen, um das Betreten deines Grundstücks zu verbieten/verhindern?
limes11 (2022-09-06 21:06:37+00:00): reverted due to broken geometry
eggie (2022-09-06 19:21:52+00:00): Hi shigi..
I think it's okay..
I removed only segregated =no..  That has no use .  Nothing to share on this footway..

Cheerio 
eggie
NorthCrab (2022-09-07 08:41:29+00:00): W jedną stronę jest jeszcze brak ścieżki (C13A) :D Ale wszyscy i tak jado. Piszę jako ciekawostka, odpowiada mi aktualne omapowanie ;-).
Brian Ronald (2022-09-06 19:10:31+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/cotOrzh
silversurfer83 (2022-09-07 09:16:13+00:00): Hi there,

I'd like to ask you to please comment in english or german when mapping in Germany so local mappers better understand what you're doing without need of translation service. Thank you  :)
shigi (2022-09-11 17:21:36+00:00): Hi eggie, I think you inadvertently messed up the geometry of the Noorddijk footway at the height of the sports facilities.
eggie (2022-09-11 17:25:32+00:00): I will have a look
Thanks
eggie (2022-09-11 17:31:54+00:00): fixed..  Thanks
kepivar (2022-09-08 16:54:00+00:00): Please be so kind to the other mappers and use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_changeset_comments .
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-07 05:47:02+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
kepivar (2022-09-06 19:40:44+00:00): Hi dmich,
you've deleted many features: Have they all been demolished?
dmich9 (2022-09-06 19:44:24+00:00): Nope! I'm currently doing a changeset that adds them all back but in greater detail and accuracy. All of the deleted features will be back within the day.
Allison P (2022-09-06 20:09:12+00:00): You should not do this. There is no reason it can't all be done at once. Removing good data for any length of time is never good.
dmich9 (2022-09-06 20:36:32+00:00): I've run into data loading issues (mainly the satellite imagery) when doing larger changesets like this in which everything is deleted and readded in one. Usually I have to delete everything in one changeset and add it in the next. In the future I will break them up and just go part by part.
Frans S (2022-11-01 16:11:06+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please take notice which imagery has to be used. You mapped from Bing instead of Maxar
Best regards
englu (2022-09-07 14:35:33+00:00): W Gorzupi skrzyżowanie w rzeczywistości wygląda tak: https://mapa-turystyczna.pl/uploads/photo/89682.jpg, więc poprzednia wersja była wg mnie bardziej poprawna. Skąd ta zmiana, że drogi łączą się w jednym punkcie?
szalona_entropia (2022-09-07 15:07:43+00:00): Dla przejrzystości. Np. żeby nawigacja nie kazała najpierw skręcić w lewo a potem w prawo, tylko żeby kazała jechać prosto
englu (2022-09-07 15:24:47+00:00): Zgodnie z zaleceniami nie powinno się mapować pod rendering ani routing (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer), ale jak tam chcesz. Wg mnie ta zmiana powinna zostać wycofana.
cytryn (2022-09-07 16:41:21+00:00): Tak na dobrą sprawę te "widełki" w ogóle powinny zostać uproszczone do jednej linii. Na tak krótkich odcinkach typu wysepki na przejściach zwyczajowo nie dzieli się drogi na dwie jezdnie:  https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=850847#p850847
szalona_entropia (2022-09-07 17:00:01+00:00): Prawda, też myślałem o całkowitym skasowaniu tego rozdzielenia.
To jest dobra praktyka mapowania skrzyżowań, a że przy okazji pomaga routingowi to nie ma w tym nic złego: https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/
englu (2022-09-08 07:01:38+00:00): OK, to uprościłem skrzyżowanie do jednej drogi. Dzięki za uwagi.
f_husni (2024-04-23 02:55:27+00:00): Hello i have seen your edits on way/1092457305 and way/172752269 or front Jalan Benda Timur  and you had added motor_vehicle=no access and in reality both of these highways can access by any vehicle or motorcar.  this is proof that all highways actually can access by any vehicle https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3839526246169375&lat=-6.332770861729301&lng=106.7100070763222&z=17.588090556425136&x=0.4999828444063554&y=0.5411048703931403&zoom=0
Baconcrisp (2024-04-29 18:39:54+00:00): Hey f_husni,

This account is now inactive so you're welcome to update/fix anything of theirs you find while editing!

Baconcrisp
silversurfer83 (2024-11-16 17:11:59+00:00): Hi there :)

I just now saw, that you added quite some tower=power to the map and gave them names. I strongly suspect, that you meant to put these values in the "ref=" key, am I right?

cheers
silversurfer83
Ibot123 (2025-10-05 21:39:07+00:00): I changed it after  a year ;-)
silversurfer83 (2025-10-05 21:55:35+00:00): thank you :)
Mohamed alhaj1997 (2022-09-07 14:59:37+00:00): قرية دار الحاج
eggie (2022-09-06 20:36:59+00:00): Beste Bugra..
Hier is geen photoshop bekend onder deze naam.
Graag reactie..
Mvg
Eggie
habi (2022-09-12 09:05:22+00:00): Du hast hier bei mehreren Wegen `foot=no` hinzugefügt, d.h. die Wege sind für Fussgänger:innen gesperrt.
Ist das in der Realität so?
habi (2022-09-12 09:08:19+00:00): Gerade https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991911863/ sieht mir nach https://www.strava.com/heatmap#16.33/7.42003/47.02792/hot/run als relativ stark begangen aus, auch wenn die Heatmap für Velos dort etwas stärker leuchtet.
yasslay (2022-09-06 20:09:45+00:00): Hello!

Please include better changeset comments describing the changes you have made to OpenStreetMap as it is good mapping practice.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards,
yasslay
jnighan (2023-06-18 20:18:16+00:00): Hi, what is the railway that you have mapped here?
Muhmaker (2022-09-07 09:15:27+00:00): Moin. Die Adressen sind jetzt doppelt erfasst. Bitte korrigieren. Wenn du die Extra-Adress-Knoten behalten willst eventuell an die Innenhof-Seite verschieben. Dort sind auch die Eingänge. Den Fussweg zwischen Nummer 16 und 18 könntest du auch noch vom Nebelswall trennen wenn du dort aktiv wirst. Dort ist eine Mauer und es geht mehr als 2 Meter nach unten.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125874432
DeFra85 (2022-09-07 11:11:28+00:00): Okay. Auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/ wurden die Hausnummern nicht mehr angezeigt. Dann entferne ich die "Gebäudeteile", weil die ja nicht wirklich den Ist-Zustand beschreiben: Ist ja EIN Gebäude. 
Um den Weg kümmere ich mich dann auch.
VLD190 (2022-09-21 18:04:36+00:00): Hello user @P-E_LRX,
It has come to my attention that your most recent Changeset# 125874810 has broken the relation# 3638339. The provided comment writes that you deleted the “old moremi game reserve boundaries, [because] the new are already here!” I searched online but I am having difficulty finding an updated boundary map that is less than five years old. Could you please provide supporting evidence to show the new boundary lines of the Moremi Game Reserve? 

I also found relation# 13979637 which shows a closed loop for the Moremi reserve boundary lines.If you can please provide supporting evidence by the end of the day Friday, otherwise I will have to revert your relation and refer to relation 13979637 for the up-to-date boundary lines.

Best regards,
David
trigpoint (2024-03-08 14:00:32+00:00): Hi
Legal prohibitions of foot/horse/bikes are very rare in the UK.

I cannot recall any such restriction on this part of the A5 and cannot see the necessary signs of mapillary imagery.

You say Self Observered, what precisely did you observe to make this judgement?

Cheers Phil
ArjanJager (2024-03-10 19:12:49+00:00): Hey Phil,

Thanks for the comment. I am not aware of these legal laws, as I am Dutch. I changed it as I deemed it to dangerous, and I wanted to cover all the streets in this county on Wandrer.earth - walking this street seems not wise.
ArjanJager (2024-03-10 19:14:50+00:00): And for this part of th A5 there is actually a path for cyclist etc on the right (direction NW).
trigpoint (2024-03-10 19:41:56+00:00): Thank you.
To the east there is a path cyclists and pedestrians, but any router worth its salt will choose this over the road, but to the west there is no alternative. A pedestrian will choose the verge obviously.

In OSM we map legal access restrictions, not what we think are dangerous.

These restrictions should be removed.

Cheers Phil
ArjanJager (2024-03-10 19:55:45+00:00): Thanks.
You are right we should map legal access. Surprising to me though that legally you can walk on the highway.
I'll remove the restrictions.
trigpoint (2024-03-10 20:18:52+00:00): Thank you.

All roads and paths are highways :) 

And the A5 is a very a very ancient one. Removing highway rights is generally no done. We have a saying "Once a highway always a highway" which was coined in 1921. Roads with restricted access are mostly new builds which have never had foot/bicycle/horse access rights.

Cheers Phil
ArjanJager (2024-03-10 20:40:15+00:00): Well, thanks I learned something new. Just makes it extra challenging for us Wandrer.earth to get 100% on all roads in counties. At least I know now if I go get at it again, I won't be arrested.
trigpoint (2024-03-10 21:17:08+00:00): The only public roads you are not allowed to walk on are motorways and where specifically signed.

https://assets.digital.cabinet-office.gov.uk/media/55b8bd6fe5274a151e000015/Information-sign-start-motorway.jpg
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8f/UK_traffic_sign_625.1.svg/80px-UK_traffic_sign_625.1.svg.png

I assume you are talking about the roads in Warwickshire in this case? Although imho the rights of way make a far nicer walk :)

Cheers Phil
jeslop (2022-09-06 21:05:56+00:00): Hola David. En esta área no cabe la etiqueta place=.... Si miras la wiki /https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:place?uselang=es), se usa para "Debe existir una etiqueta de lugar para cada asentamiento humano significativo (ciudad, pueblo, suburbio, etc.) y también para lugares deshabitados destacados que sean conocidos por un nombre. " Esto ya se cumple en el núcleo de Genicera. Pero esta área que dibujas no es ni un lugar declarado administrativamente, ni un asentamiento poblado urbano o rural, ni entra tampoco en la categoría de otros luagres (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:place?uselang=es#Otros_lugares). 

Aquí cabe un landuse=  , si eres de la zona y sabes que ocupa este territorio. Aquí tienes las distintas posibilidades: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Uso_del_suelo

Saludos.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
David Ll L (2022-09-07 13:55:09+00:00): Buenas de nuevo. Estuve echando un vistazo a las referencias landuse y no vi nada que encajara con este tipo de división. En ese caso me gustaría consultarte cual elegiría usted ya que se trata de una división de tipo administrativo, la de la junta vecinal, en la que se mantiene el control sobre las tierras y el ganado además de tener competencia en todo el tema de obras, evidentemente entendiendo que por envima de esta institución están el ayuntamiento y la diputación. Entonces no sabría que denominación darle aquí en OpenSreetMap, pero se que dentro del municipio se dividen todas las localidades en este mismo tipo de entidades pero únicamente conozco las divisiones de Genicera pues las tomé, ya no solo por conocimiento de mi padre, sino además de un plano militar que se hizo en los años 60 y que se actualizó no hará muchos años con los respectivos límites. Entonces ahí surgen mis dudas, ¿cómo podría denominarse?

Gracias
jeslop (2022-09-07 14:45:08+00:00): Vale, ya he entendido lo que quieres representar. 

Se trata de un límite territorial: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:boundary. 

Como el territorio de la junta vecinal tiene reconocimiento administrativo (por parte del ayuntamiento) lo puedes etiquetar  como boundary=administrative y admin_level=9,que es el que le correspondería: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#admin_level.

De todas formas, respecto a ese mapa militar que citas, recuerda que en OSM no se puede utilizar material para el que no se tenga permiso de reproducción: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright. Si la información es de una fuente directa, en este caso tu padre, sí se podría utilizar.

Un saludo.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
David Ll L (2022-09-07 16:24:53+00:00): Pues paso a editarlo. Sobre el mapa militar se hizo en su día sobre los linderos del camino, que ya de por sí eran conocidos por los vecinos. Es por ello por lo que mi padre me pudo ayudar con ello, porque íbamos contrastando lo que decia con este mapa y efectivamente se correspondía. Igualmente los ya del resto de localidades de este municipio de Cármenes (e imagino que de la práctica totalidad de pueblos de León) pero de eso ya no tengo información y la tendría que obtener de otras personas y, quizas, de otros mapas.
user_5359 (2022-09-07 08:44:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1092467208. What is the meaning of the tag paV = 1? There is also a unknown key PAV.
ftcat (2022-09-07 07:09:35+00:00): Hi Charles96,

Please don't mass import data like this. There are a number of problems when this is done.

1. There is no check to see if the  feature may have already been mapped

2. The names have mixed capitalization and there are numerous spelling errors. 'shop' is not a name it is a description of the building type. 'kantemba' on its own is not a name but also 'kantembas' are, by their nature, temporary so may no longer exist.

3. building=Commercial Building is not a recognized building tag, building=commercial is but many of these would be better tagged building=retail, all tags lowercase.

Over all these imports degrade the quality of the data in OpenStreetMap. The idea is to improve the quality and hence the reliability of the data mapped so that people have confidence in the maps accuracy and use the data, if the data is poor people will not use the maps in a meaningful way as they don't trust it. The idea is not to add as much data as you can but to make sure the data already there and the data that is added is as accurate as possible.

I am going to revert these changes.

Thanks
charles chilufya (2022-09-07 11:56:47+00:00): hi thank you for feedback those were uploaded yesterday, i uploaded based on data model i had but i have a good and reserved data model. and everything i am from updating has been cleared and checked. the first yes and i am running overpass so that i can reverse them.
charles chilufya (2022-10-23 22:27:12+00:00): Hi @ftcat, i was in field to verify some POI you deleted last time and i found that all POI we added were deleted. i have come back again, i want to know exactly why that data was deleted while it was authentic and accurate. ?
rab (2022-10-24 16:14:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

https://up.picr.de/44583555ut.jpg

the building nodes qualify clearly for a bad undiscussed import
(should have been shop=* instead?)

And the highlighted points and unclassified roads show poor mapping and validation 
https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/10422/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111798684
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 15:17:06+00:00): Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero "3 - 4 -5" è errato. Ciao, Andrea PS Ma il ref è corretto?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-10 21:30:15+00:00): essas áreas que voce marcou como parque, não parecem corretas, ta mais pra uma area verde, em tags seria landuse=grass
somix (2022-09-07 19:12:40+00:00): Hi, about the tag service=parking_aisle. The wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle#Disambiguation) says "Not every roadway within a parking lot is a parking aisle. Examples are...

Road connects a parking lot or parking garage to a through street and serves as the entrance or exit of the lot or garage – use highway=service without service=* instead.
"and since it is the only road to enter/exit the parking lot, the service=parking_aisle tag is not needed here.
somix (2022-09-07 19:14:37+00:00): Also, it's probably better to map the parking lot with one line covering the entire parking lot and individual parking spaces with amenity=parking_space.
somix (2022-09-07 19:19:49+00:00): The sign is "looking" in the direction of way, so it should be direction=forward, not backward.
HellMap (2022-09-07 19:29:13+00:00): Hi! I'm not sure which service road (sections) you think are tagged incorrectly. As per wiki, the only sections I tagged as service=parking_aisle are the ones that are directly adjacent to parking spaces. The sections entering/exiting and turns without adjacent parking are not tagged as aisles.
HellMap (2022-09-07 19:31:29+00:00): I moved the yield sign. The problem was that is was on the intersection of multiple ways. (I added it before I added the areas). So the direction was messed up depending on the way you considered. It should be good now I think. It's still `direction=backward` though because it's "looking" in the opposite direction of the entrance/exit service way.
HellMap (2022-09-07 19:51:50+00:00): I changed individual `amenity=parking` to `amenity=parking_space` with `capacity=#`.

I guess that's a bit better, I think.

I am not sure what one would do if I couldn't count the capacity from aerial, because otherwise the default assumes 1 space. I have seen a bunch of examples where individual "boxes" are mapped as `amenity=parking` but there is no parking space separation.
eggie (2022-09-07 05:54:25+00:00): Hier heb je dus gewoon de oude situatie ingetekend en mijn werk weer verwijderd.. terwijl ik dat deze week juist had aangepast. 
Ik kan niet zien hier welke achtergrond je gebruikt, maar ik vermoed PDOK luchtfoto 7,5 cm actueel. Nu... deze is gedateerd.
Volgens mij zijn die beelden uit 2019.

Je moet Quick ortho gebruiken 
2022 25 cm 

Dat hele restaurant bij de parkeerplaats is er helemaal niet meer. De golfbaan is uitgebreid met vlakken water. Die heb je verwijderd. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125878233

Ga eens op zoek naar die nieuwe lagen. Op het forum loopt een draadje hoe dat te doen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644&p=3

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-07 06:17:06+00:00): Die bunkers die je hebt ingetekend op de golfbaan is ook allemaal de oude situatie. Net als de loop van het water. Dat isop veel plaatsen verlegd wegen de bouw van het nieuwe clubhuis/restaurant. 
De wegen en paden zijn ook allemaal aangepakt. 
Zelfs Quick Ortho 8 cm is nog gedateerd.
Ortho 25 cm klopt wel.
Je zult wel die links moeten zetten in JOSM. Dan heb je een hele riedel aan foto's.
Teek.. kijk ook altijd naar de datum van de laatste edit. 
Ik pas even grofweg wat aan. Dan kun jij als je de nieuwste layers hebt gevonden het verfijnen.
Laat WMTS Ortho actueel links liggen in de lijst. Die zijn juiste verouderd. je moet het net maar weten.
De 25 cm 2022 moet je hebben.
Groet
eggie
Kijk eens hier op sat dataprotaal. Die van juni 2022 is wellicht iets duidelijker.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=07-09-2021&loc=53.14839%2C4.857008%2C17z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-07-30&acqid=20220730_110802_SV1-04&sensor=SuperView-1
eggie (2022-09-07 06:39:16+00:00): Vergelijk steeds je foto's onderling met bv 't Hanenhuis en het wegenstelsel. 
De Roggeslootweg is ook verlegd. 
k Heb het oude restaurant verwijderd en de de adresnode met gegevens overgezet.
Het water ook weer aangepast.. Genoeg hier nog te doen, maar dan wel met een recente foto. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-09-07 06:42:20+00:00): Het waterbekken ten no van het zonnepark is ook een goede graadmeter. Dat is onlangs aangelegd. 
Zie je landuse dan heb je een oude foto... al staat er 100x actueel.
emvee (2023-03-16 07:20:59+00:00): Deze set heeft ook wat bijzonder landuse opgeleverd, https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/53.11908/4.83102

Ik geloof niet dat dat de https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth is...
eggie (2023-03-16 08:09:32+00:00): 'Leuk' grapje...    Had het ook al eens opgemerkt.
Eerst was het grassland naast grassland in mp. Nu leeg. 
Effect van maaien? 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125703514
account TEEK is niet meer actief en heeft een blokkade van de DWG. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127748806

Up to you.. 
eggie
eggie (2023-03-16 08:12:53+00:00): In Esri kun je het nog zien..  In latere recentere PDOK niet meer.
Het is niet verzonnen. 
Wat er nu te zien is geen idee.
emvee (2023-04-10 07:11:13+00:00): Obligue heeft een mooi overzicht, van de acht jaar dat er een foto is, is er alleen in 2021 iets van te zien. 

Het is reclame en de "inners" zijn nog steed gras dus heb ik het maar verwijderd: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134713747
eggie (2023-04-10 07:21:52+00:00): Met groeiende grassprietjes weet je het nooit. In ieder geval ground_truth nu 😀
Mapper is overigens weer actief onder een ander account.
Groet..
eggie
Jordi MF (2022-09-06 23:44:32+00:00): A pesar de que el área editada parece que sea grande, solamente he editado la entrada al pueblo de les Coves de Vinromà para crear una rotonda que cortaba la relación de la Vía Augusta. Además, en JOSM, he bajado toda la relación de la Vía Augusta para añadir un tramo que faltaba en esta relación a la salida del pueblo (les Coves de Vinromà).
Jordi MF (2022-09-06 23:46:22+00:00): Se me olvidaba comentar que también he añadido el nombre de dos barrancos (el Río Vilanova y el Barranc del Mas Vell).
Warin61 (2022-09-08 00:40:24+00:00): That would imply bicycle=dismount.