piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2016-12-12 23:03:28+00:00): highway=rest_area is niet de juiste tagging voor een parkeerplaats voor in dit geval vliegtuigspotters. Deze heb ik inmiddels verwijderd.
Ik heb inmiddels de serviceweg naar de spottersbult aangebracht met parkeerplaats. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area
muralito (2016-12-14 13:37:15+00:00): No. No son cuatro amenity=school ni estan ubicadas como las mapeaste.

Mira como quedo ahora, con los cambios https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44397114 y https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44397034

Los tres elementos con su respectivo limite, edificios y entrada. Eso es lo que hay que hacer. Mapear datos reales que puedan tener para multiples aplicaciones.
literan (2016-12-13 11:51:55+00:00): Пока получилось только наполовину) Посмотрите, я исправил. Вкратце: адреса на входах не нужны; name - для имен собственных (у подъездов вряд ли есть), номер -> в тег ref
MonkasteR (2016-12-13 12:00:31+00:00): Отлично! А то инфы мало по этой теме. А подъезды нам иногда нужны. Спасибо за помощь.
muralito (2016-12-14 00:16:00+00:00): Mario, ¿es solo consultorio odontologico, no?

¿Abris sabados y domingos de 10 a 19?
Mario Bortagaray Odontologo Salto (2016-12-14 12:56:48+00:00): No. Sábados y domingos no. Gracias
muralito (2016-12-14 13:44:23+00:00): OK. Fue lo que pusiste...

Decime en criollo que días y  horario abre así lo agrego.
Mario Bortagaray Odontologo Salto (2016-12-14 14:41:27+00:00): lunes a viernes de 10 a 12 y 15 a 19
muralito (2016-12-15 13:54:00+00:00): Listo.
Endres Pelka (2017-01-27 20:11:27+00:00): Kino czy biblioteka?
santamariense (2016-12-12 18:00:55+00:00): Olá e Bem vindo ao OSM. Este objeto (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2722021458) não deveria ter sido excluído. Só o fato dele ter o número da casa perante a rua já era uma informação importantíssima.
Roger C Soares (2016-12-13 19:12:00+00:00): Changeset revertido.
AsgerFrank (2016-12-12 20:04:35+00:00): Der må kunne angives en source, en kilde for hvad sydfynske pilgrimrute er, og hvor linjeføringen stammer fra.
Der tilsyneladende ingen i relation, ændringssæt, elementer eller andet sted at se.
ChehrehBargi (2020-03-14 13:50:59+00:00): Hi
Alley grading in Iran is not used with the service = alley tag and is very rarely used. The highway = residential tag is used to do this.
Good luck
Thanks
mueschel (2016-12-17 13:49:32+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way? The tag "  restiction:hgv = parking:lane:right" looks strange.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459217769

Jan
4123e4e1df3 (2016-12-17 13:56:38+00:00): Hi. I doubt about this tag but don't understand what is will be the best. Maybe you have experience?
mueschel (2016-12-17 14:00:28+00:00): Can you explain what you want to tag? I can't guess from the tag.
4123e4e1df3 (2016-12-17 15:36:52+00:00): On this road part right side parking prohibited for truck and heavy velocity
mueschel (2016-12-17 16:53:09+00:00): That's... complicated. I will see if I can find something.
Pontiac_CZ (2017-05-13 16:23:13+00:00): Ahoj, pozor na editace - tady jsi z potoku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46604884 asi nechtěně udělal cestu.
Pontiac_CZ (2017-05-13 16:29:17+00:00): Na druhou stranu - jsem pro to tak ponechat :), protože jsem po té cestě ( v dolní části) šel a potoku jsem si nevšiml.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-12 20:21:14+00:00): why so many delete nodes/ways? Are you correcting something?
JesseFTW (2022-07-10 17:47:59+00:00): Note that you accidentally moved a power pole wildly out of position; I've fixed it now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1744491741
Hjart (2016-12-12 19:56:17+00:00): Det står bottens profilside hvad man kan gøre.
mths (2016-12-12 20:14:19+00:00): Ahh ja, det gør der jo også :D Skulle dog lige læse det igennem et par gange for at sikre mig at jeg havde forstået det rigtigt. For "fixme key allows contributors to mark objects and places that need further attention.", hvilket jo er det modsatte her kan jeg forstå? Ved at vi har fixet noget, og stadig påstår at det skal fixes. Underligt, oh well.. Må sætte tagsne næste gang jeg lige kommer forbi området eller retter på nogle adresse positioner.
Hjart (2016-12-12 21:28:48+00:00): Nøglen ois:fixme skulle så vidt jeg husker mere være et forsøg på at tiltrække ois's opmærksomhed til et objekt, så den forhåbentlig bliver rettet der, så den kan ikke helt sammenlignes med en regulær fixme. 
Jeg har dog ikke nogen helst ide om hvorvidt ois:fixme virker efter hensigten på anden måde end at hindre AWSBot i at røre ved et givet objekt.
AsgerFrank (2016-12-12 22:26:16+00:00): Jeg har desværre ikke tjek på præcis hvad  man må/kan/skal med adressenoder, men har dog regnet med at der er grunde så det ikke går an at flytte på så mange af dem som man vil, uanset de af adressemyndigheden ikke er positioneret optimalt. Undtagen undtagelsestilfælde, der kunne være hvis man selv har sørget for det er blevet rettet hos dem, eller ser det sker (det er nogenlunde sådan jeg har brugt det hidtil).
RoterEmil (2017-10-17 21:01:13+00:00): Hi 'anbr', warum hast Du in diesem CS und ggf. auch in weiteren von Einbahnstraßen, in denen Radfahrer in beide Richtungen fahren dürfen, das cycleway=opposite entfernt (und das oneway:bicycle=no erhalten)? Nötig ist laut wiki beides. Mir war das nach dem Schauen in die history des Maulbronner Ufers aufgefallen, als ich diese note einarbeiten wollte: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1173282. Es sind in diesem CS aber auch weitere Straßen von Dir umgetaggt worden.

Danke für Deine Antwort und schöne Grüße
adjuva (2016-12-20 09:49:19+00:00): Hallo CarstenG!

Vor diesem Edit hatten alle RE/RB/S in NRW das network-Tag 'NRW Regionalverkehr'.

Wenn Du Dein eigenes network-Tag haben möchtest, dann füg es bitte mit Semikolon hinten an und erhalte die vorhandenen Werte!
literan (2016-12-13 11:28:04+00:00): Есть мнение, что вы некорректно используете тег website, т.к. он - для официальных сайтов объектов. Открыто обсуждение на форуме: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=622003#p622003
literan (2016-12-13 11:29:26+00:00): это не name, это description (описание)
j-wills (2016-12-16 20:17:03+00:00): так и называется ?
в name заносится имя собственное, а не описание
yzemaze (2016-12-17 19:11:22+00:00): Please have a look at the cycleway next to Viario de Ronda. It crosses the street and a footway without connections. Additionally vehicle=no seems illogical and foot=no is not necessary (cycleway => foot=no by default).
yzemaze (2016-12-17 19:12:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174949805
bpowell1 (2016-12-12 21:35:00+00:00): Paraguay not Uruguay
j03lar50n (2016-12-13 15:39:46+00:00): Nice! Thanks, bro
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-21 17:45:02+00:00): Hej, jakie jest źródło przebiegu lini https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218115873/history ?
Eimai (2016-12-12 23:05:29+00:00): Hey, oppassen wat je doet, want je hebt een hoop paden veranderd in autosnelwegen... Je wil niet dat er plots een hoop auto's door die bossen gaan racen :-)
bpowell1 (2016-12-12 21:34:41+00:00): Paraguay not Uruguay
mueschel (2016-12-17 13:48:32+00:00): Hallo,
das Tagging scheint hier nicht ganz zu stimmen.

Gruß, Jan
Nordpfeil (2016-12-25 21:51:49+00:00): Hallo Jan,
da ist tatsächlich was durcheinandergeraten. Werde das gleich ändern. Besten Dank
Nordpfeil
anu_bala (2019-04-03 05:35:18+00:00): """Hi RichRico,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across 

""""way 458630291
way 459240367"""" classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,these seems to be residential'. Please look into this and share your thoughts on this.

Thanks in advance."""
bpowell1 (2016-12-12 21:34:21+00:00): Paraguay not Uruguay
luschi (2016-12-13 18:41:27+00:00): why have you deleted the bridge what I added here?      https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459208064     
I can see this perfect on the Bing image and all other what we can use for OSM.     
Also the way from north to south for me looks like the old part of the SP205, and so I added old_ref=SP205.      
Ant at last, the enter in a roundabout should not connected with the same node as a exit.
Also you have edited(very little) the track what I have added in the north of the roundabout.     
Why you changed all these after I made this?     
And if you revert a changeset from a other user, you have to write a better changeset comment.     
     
Please give me some answer here!
fayor (2016-12-14 13:36:24+00:00): Quel ponte non è più percorribile, faceva parte del percorso della SP205 ma attualmente è all'interno di una proprietà privata.
Il resto della SP205, anche se chiusa al traffico, ha mantenuto ancora il ref (quindi non è old_ref), a meno che non esistano provvedimenti di declassificazione o cessione che mi siano sfuggiti.
luschi (2016-12-14 17:40:32+00:00): If this is private, you can use access=private and if this was the SP205 there is nothing wrong if I add old_ref to the track and the private part in the south.
The bridge should be mapped with access=private, old_ref=SP205 and on the north end of the bridge noexit=yes, because this bridge existing for real.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-08 12:22:55+00:00): Chwila, to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26575646/history jest asfaltowe, żwirowe czy ubitym żwirem?

Bo 

surface=gravel
tracktype=grade1

jest wewnętrznie sprzeczne.
elgon (2022-08-10 14:52:58+00:00): Jeśli dałem surface=gravel, to nie jest to asfalt. Pewnie powinno być tracktype=grade2
BCNorwich (2016-12-14 07:26:43+00:00): Hi, are you sure Fairways joins to Granville Road here now, there was a fence and verge separating them?
Nuggg (2016-12-14 08:31:06+00:00): Not sure what you mean by the fence and verge "separating" them, but then I did not see it before. Certainly it is now an open and working junction.
BCNorwich (2016-12-13 06:49:23+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thanks for the recent additions to the OSM database. I have however removed POIs :- Westminister Abbey, Trafalgar Square, and both National Gallery. The reason being that the information in the POIs is already mapped/contained on the feature (area or building). The Starbucks POI is also removed as a POI already existed.
py_berrard (2016-12-12 22:26:48+00:00): Mis le 113 à la position constatée sur le terrain et supprimé le 113 importé de GrandNancy.
Pour info, le 103 est correct dans les données GN.
gileri (2016-12-29 14:33:32+00:00): Hello,

Looks like you imported data from Wikidata, which is fine in my book (I haven't checked exactly whether the CC0 license is compatible with ODbL though).

However, some tags shouldn't have been imported as-is, such as commonscat and image.

Also, alt_names should be separated using semicolons instead of commas.
Hjart (2016-12-13 10:39:25+00:00): Det er mig der har sat navnene på områderne, så jeg vil gerne høre din begrundelse for at fjerne dem derfra
Thue Janus Kristensen (2016-12-13 10:43:37+00:00): Jeg ved nu at det er mig som har sat navn på i hvert fald nogle (alle?) af områderne.

Ideen er at OSM default renderer ser ud til at tegne bynavne mere regulært når de er på dedikerede Hamlet/Town noder - tit er de ikke synlige på mange zoom-niveauer når de er på områder. Og i den rigtige størrelse, med Town-noder større end Hamlet-noder.

Men jeg ved faktisk ikke hvad der er bedst practice.
Hjart (2016-12-13 11:14:04+00:00): Hvis du ser på historikken (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90131337/history) for denne her f. eks. vil du kunne se at jeg for ikke mere end en måned siden satte navn og andet info (bl.a. wikipedia link) på området. Alt dette ekstra info har du nu koblet fra områdenavnet, hvilket jeg ærlig talt er noget ked af. 
Jeg mindes tydeligt selv at have anbragt navn på ikke alle, men adskillige af de øvrige områder. Formålet har  været bl.a. at kunne zoome direkte til området, når jeg søger på bynavnet. Når bynavnet blot er på en node kan maskineriet ikke vide hvor stor byen/området er og zoomer derfor ofte enten for tæt på eller for alt langt ud.
Problemet med at by/områdenavn ikke altid renderes "regulært" bør efter min mening rettes ved at modificere renderen, ikke ved partout at fjerne navn mm fra ellers korrekt taggede bypolygoner.
Hvor en navngiven bebyggelse eller lignende er vanskeligt definerbar er det mest passende at bruge en node, men i dette tilfælde bl.a. hvor der netop er tale om en veldefineret bebyggelse, vil jeg mene at det er mest korrekt at have navn mm på området/polygonen.
Hjart (2016-12-13 11:14:40+00:00): Jeg må sige jeg er mest stemt for at revertere dine ændringer i denne forbindelse.
Thue Janus Kristensen (2016-12-13 11:46:55+00:00): Det er fint med mig at du reverterer. Jeg har ikke så stærke følelser omkring det.
Hjart (2016-12-13 09:42:53+00:00): Det er mig der har sat navn på områderne, så jeg vil gerne lige høre din begrundelse for at placere navnene på noder i stedet.
Thue Janus Kristensen (2016-12-13 10:43:25+00:00): Jeg ved nu at det er mig som har sat navn på i hvert fald nogle (alle?) af områderne.

Ideen er at OSM default renderer ser ud til at tegne bynavne mere regulært når de er på dedikerede Hamlet/Town noder - tit er de ikke synlige på mange zoom-niveauer når de er på områder. Og i den rigtige størrelse, med Town-noder større end Hamlet-noder.

Men jeg ved faktisk ikke hvad der er bedst practice.
Carlos Brys (2016-12-13 22:08:17+00:00): Modifique los nombres de los negocios, quitando la descripción y corregí los números de teléfono
Peter Dobratz (2016-12-17 19:20:42+00:00): Thanks for updating some local hospitals.

I'm trying to standardize formatting of phone numbers to +1-xxx-xxx-xxxx format (same as what you entered, except using dash "-" instead of space " " for the separator).

For the website URL, it's better to stick to the simplest form, such as:
http://www.kaiserpermanente.org/
The drawback is that it doesn't link to the specific facility, but it's much less likely to break over time when they update their website.
manings (2017-04-10 06:59:45+00:00): This seems to be directional markers and not postoffcies, reveretd here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47612056
wAndrychowiepl (2018-03-22 11:09:33+00:00): oprócz forum tutaj też się przypominam z prośbą o usunięcie starej adresacji w całej gminie Wieprz :)
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-09-28 19:45:02+00:00): Fully reverted in osm.org/changeset/172582321 because we don't record any airplane document can't been seen in satellite imagery.
dgitto (2016-12-13 05:47:41+00:00): L'ufficio postale è duplicato. E non mi sembra che occupi l'intero edificio. Per questo è reso come nodo.
(stessa cosa varrebbe per il bar)
dgitto (2016-12-13 06:00:03+00:00): Ciao. La SP 21 esiste già e va da Romissa a San Biagio. Dove hai visto che il tratto da Rina a Savoca è una provinciale?
woodpeck (2016-12-13 06:46:58+00:00): Please write your changeset comment in the "comment" field (not "comments") so that it can properly be processed and displayed.
Wetitpig0 (2016-12-13 08:45:57+00:00): How to reopen a changeset?
woodpeck (2016-12-13 09:43:18+00:00): You can't reopen it. I meant just for the future, apparently you're not using one of the standard editors, so whatever software you use, make sure you use the "comment" field not "comments".

Regarding the boundary zone. You have mapped a very large area that is up to 10km wide and has whole villages in it where people live as a military area. There might be some restrictions on entering, or some special rules like "carry passport with you at all time", but to qualify as a military area it must be *used* by the military, not by farmers. I won't change it back now because I have no first-hand knowledge of the area but I suggest that you discuss the issue with the local mappers on the Belarus forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=35 - many are also hanging out on the https://telegram.me/bygis chat.
FairwayEstates (2016-12-13 15:31:06+00:00): These 12 buildings that were added are named Fairway Estates Apartments
AsgerFrank (2016-12-13 06:20:14+00:00): Men efter luftfotoet er dokken der tilsyneladende stadig, måske det er en  museums-dok.
Fremfor ligefrem deleted kan man overveje et af lifecycle taggene http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused
fx 
disused:waterway=dock og disused:dock=drydock
(eller abandoned; er lidt i tvivl)
b-holdet (2016-12-13 06:23:19+00:00): Jeg har sat tags som deleted:xxx så de er stadig på stedet.

Men det er som du selv er inde på, et museum, der ligger nede i tørdokken. Et spændende sted om søfart.
AsgerFrank (2016-12-13 06:45:32+00:00): Ok, godt! Og også derfor jeg foreslår disused eller abandoned som bedre end deleted-præfixet. Ingen af dem bliver vistnok renderet heller.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:49:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44151319, 44105238, 44127540, 44117498, 44095323, 44090371, 44115857, 44142301, 44115747, 44095990, 44076764, 44151536, 44103719, 44076948, 44086754, 44142057, 44077143, 44088709, 44090031, 44117920, 44147496, 44148457, 44116945, 44089731, 44117231, 44160662, 44151194, 44103294, 44162807, 44049218, 44146868, 44120379, 44086463, 44105435, 44118548, 44075180, 44095678, 44139231, 44127700, 44119854, 44076363, 44139511, 44149374, 44120597, 44117738, 44085388, 44049801, 44076535, 44160883, 44118030, 44149188, 44159984, 44147074, 44119479, 44147291, 44118907, 44127096, 44149593, 44139786, 44150655.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:14:33+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
literan (2016-12-13 11:18:47+00:00): банкомат в парке, на улице? не верю
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:14:39+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:14:45+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:14:51+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
PlaneMad (2016-12-13 08:06:29+00:00): Nice work!
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
Carnildo (2016-12-13 07:30:47+00:00): Um, what?

Last time I drove past, that sure looked like a statue of Abraham Lincoln.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
Upendrakarukonda (2016-12-21 07:51:52+00:00): Hello  yaakoub bouss,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are appreciated. But these many springs in one place seem unreasonable. May I know the source behind your mapping? If these are indeed mistagged or mismapped, it would be great if you can  fix your edits.

Regards,

Upendra
user_2842609 (2016-12-26 15:19:47+00:00): Salam Yaakoub,
Wechno hada fi Setif ? Des bouches pour l'extinction d'incendie ? Merci de préciser s'il vous plait. Nous pourrons vous aider à mieux tagguer votre contribution.
Salutations amicales.
mavl (2017-10-21 06:01:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53119165 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44274326].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:14:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
highflyer74 (2016-12-13 19:17:18+00:00): Moin!

Sei bitte so nett, aussagekräftige Changeset Kommentare zu verwenden. "Anpassung" bzw. "Bauliche Veränderungen" sind leider gerade bei Changesets, die einen größeren Bereich bzw. viele Objekte umfassen, nicht ausreichend, um einen Überblick zu behalten. Schau' Dir dazu gern https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments an. Danke!
letihu (2017-01-30 08:03:24+00:00): Wenn hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459308556/history
ein Fahrradweg eingetragen wird, vergiss die Wegverbindungen und die Brücken nicht.
Eigentlich ist der Fahrradweg auch schon  hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29117603/history
getaggt.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:16:02+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:16:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
abDoug (2016-12-17 05:31:44+00:00): added WRONG missing name
abDoug (2016-12-17 15:08:42+00:00): and another with wrong name - roads with wrong names are worse than roads with no name!
petrar_telenav (2016-12-19 07:06:09+00:00): I have added the names from local data (Canvec) and Geobase Roads layer. If you have other local knowledge, please be kind add them correctly.
Supaplex (2016-12-16 03:58:00+00:00): 如果那個警察局屬於駐警隊性質，那不應該標amenity=police
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
literan (2016-12-13 11:36:49+00:00): не вандальте