piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2017-06-03 12:12:30+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/Commodoortje

Klik op de link "meld u aan om mee te praten" om een reactie te geven in deze changeset.
Commodoortje (2017-06-03 12:12:36+00:00): Welkomst PB verzonden.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-16 04:21:17+00:00): [Bulacan, Laguna, and Batangas] modify names of various POI's
anderfo (2017-01-09 20:57:34+00:00): Hi,
did you add bicycle=no because it actually is *forbidden* to cycle here?
Or did you add it because this trail isn't very suitable for cycling?

In the latter case, you should use class:bicycle and/or class:bicycle:mtb to indicate the usefulness; the bicycle tag is just an access tag...

cheers,
  Anders
Jovers (2017-01-09 23:25:39+00:00): Hi
Its not forbitten butt its high up in the mountan and its only a walking path with few marks, som you probably ned to carry your bike. The problem is if you select auto rout om a bike gps its sending you over the mountains. Its dangerous if you try. 
But its up to you if you change it back
Regards jørn
Ser ut som om du er norsk så har du prøvd deg på ruta? Det var flere av løypene over fjellet som var merket sykkel mulig så når gps`n min ville ha meg over fjellet så tenkte jeg det var greit og stenge den, hvis folk bare setter den på auto så ser det ikke så langt ut til lysebotn :-)
anderfo (2017-01-10 08:23:55+00:00): Jeg har ikke prøvd meg på ruta, men jeg har syklet mye i fjellet andre steder og bruker kartet mtbmap.no ganske mye. Der oppdager jeg av og til at noen har lagt inn bicycle=no på stier som er hyppig brukt av terrengsyklister og hvor det er fullt lovlig å sykle. I de aller fleste tilfellene viser det seg at den som satte bicycle=no trodde taggen skulle brukes om "hvor egnet stien er med sykkel" men det er feil.

Hvis sykkel-GPS-en din sender deg på sykkel over fjellet er det en dårlig rutingalgoritme den har valgt, eventuelt feil innstillinger (skiller den mellom sti og vei? spør den hva slags sykkel du bruker?). Riktig metode her er å tagge med class:bicycle (som sier noe om hvor egnet stien er med "vanlig sykkel"), og så kan en terrengsyklist eventuelt bruke class:bicycle:mtb (som sier noe om hvor egnet stien er for terrengsykling) og mtb:scale (sier noe om hvor vanskelig det er å sykle der), osv.
Taggen du har brukt, bicycle, handler kun og "legal access". Dvs. bicycle=no betyr at det er ulovlig å sykle. Den skal derfor kun brukes i enkelte naturreservater, i et område på Fløyen, langs endel motorveier og gjennom noen kirkegårder...
Ellers blir OSM fullt av feilinformasjon.
Jovers (2017-01-10 09:42:05+00:00): ok, kjekt med ett lite kurs :-), skal prøve og rette på det. setter ja og kun for eksperter. Det er en vanlig garmin som bruker open street map jeg brukte
anderfo (2017-01-10 10:20:06+00:00): Supert. Mer info her:
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Mountain_biking
user_5359 (2016-11-14 18:21:09+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Für eine bessere Beschreibung bitte die Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant lesen.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:34:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:34:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
Commodoortje (2016-11-15 00:09:40+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-11-15 00:16:34+00:00): Je hebt 2 lijnen aangebracht zonder tags.
Ik heb het voor je verbeterd.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4gez3qg2ti1abar/2016-11-15_01-08-53.png?raw=1
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:34:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
mavl (2016-11-18 15:38:20+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:34:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:34:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
mavl (2016-11-18 15:40:37+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
user_5359 (2016-11-20 17:26:16+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of curve_geometry=yes? I can't find any definition. And I can't see any necessary to add this information to the node of a highway!
Guy Zohar (2016-11-22 12:02:25+00:00): Hi, 
I work for a company named Via, a ride-sharing transportation company. 
We use OSM as one of our map data sources in order to navigate in areas where we operate. One of the tags we use internally is "curve_geometry" which allows us to identify nodes that have geometrical importance. The reason this is needed on our end is because we filter nodes that have no navigation tags and, for simplicity and performance issues. We edit the OSM internally on a regular basis, and return changes to the global OSM. 
Is there a problem with these tags? Do they interfere with your work in  any way? I'd be happy to work together to improve ways in the area and use the OSM in the best possible way.

Thanks
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
mstriewe (2016-11-16 21:27:31+00:00): Hallo, in diesem Changeset ist irgendetwas seltsames mit dem Wald (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92479422) passiert. Der hat in der Mitte so einen Zacken bekommen. Sind da vielleicht ein paar Punkte verrutscht? Ist der Verlauf von http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148255798 so korrekt?
Lutz57 (2016-11-17 14:42:54+00:00): Im Wald liegen die Gebäude mit den Hausnummern 28 und 30, die Zufahrt ist ein Weg zwischen Nr. 32 und 32a.
Also alles korrekt.
Sirix (2016-11-17 18:33:57+00:00): Ich habe mal den Wald und das Wohngebiet zurück geschoben,
hast du wohl versehentlich mitgezogen...
Ist das Stück Straße, bis HN 30 ,wirklich highway=residential ? 
gruß Sirix
mavl (2016-11-18 15:43:40+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
tuxayo (2017-03-11 21:33:22+00:00): Bonjour, il faut corriger le nom de la rue (addr:street) à laquelle il manque les majuscules, le ô et le '
tuxayo (2017-03-11 21:35:02+00:00): Le noeud est aussi au milieu de la route.

Note correspondante: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/923556#map=19/43.28587/5.52390
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2017-03-13 08:15:33+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci beaucoup pour votre message, nous allons corriger cela.
tuxayo (2017-05-09 21:02:22+00:00): Merci pour la réponse et la correction! :)

(Et d'arriver à intégrer des contributions OSM dans votre modèle économique, c'est génial!)
mavl (2016-11-18 18:12:11+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
maraf24 (2016-11-16 21:56:42+00:00): You know, we don't use shop category for fuel but amenity. And amen=fuel really looks like typo for amenity=fuel.
loconvey (2016-11-17 06:58:39+00:00): Hello - my fault! Changed to amenity=fuel. Thanks for being alert!
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
mavl (2016-11-18 15:59:19+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
maraf24 (2016-11-16 21:59:33+00:00): There was nothing wrong with source:dam.
loconvey (2016-11-17 06:54:23+00:00): Hello maraf24 - your're right, formally source:dam is correct. But well - its a dam. If you had tagged the heigth of the dam plus source:height=survey, then it would mean you had measured by yourself.
I didnt want to take any details, but that was  the only source:dam on the planet.
maraf24 (2016-11-17 08:15:19+00:00): source:dam simply means its geometry was taken from Bing photos. 
source:geometry is usually used for this.
"source" tag alone is not good choice as it would become ambiguous if more tags were added (website,address etc).
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:34:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
mavl (2016-11-18 16:02:05+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
maraf24 (2016-11-16 21:46:55+00:00): I don't see any reason for cleaning.
loconvey (2016-11-17 07:04:08+00:00): Hello maraf24, both tags held the name. I kept the full name on its appropriate tag. If it ever had to be abbreviated on a display, then that is the job of the rendering system. A tag named full= would not be found. 
Have a nice day!
maraf24 (2016-11-17 08:03:45+00:00): Actually it was typo and the tag should be full_name. 
The name tag is defined as a common name, so it is not always the same as full/official name of a company.
That why it was tagged this way here.
But full=xxx is still valid tag and it should not gone. At least not before contacting original author by a changeset comment.
loconvey (2016-11-17 10:20:42+00:00): Dear maraf24,
Please feel free to compare the numbers from taginfo:
full - 0 (was: 1)
full_name - 4525
name:full - 7297
name - 53 566 227
happy mapping!
maraf24 (2016-11-17 10:30:28+00:00): Are you trying to tell me, that I can't invent the "full" tag and use it in OSM?
loconvey (2016-11-17 11:42:05+00:00): Sorry, misunderstanding. Feel free to invent ist! But the proposed meaning "the full and official name of this item" is mostly tagged as  name:full.
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
StephaneP (2016-11-14 17:27:34+00:00): 'tention ! Pour que ce soit un trunk, il faut qu'il y ait le panneau C107 (route pour automobile).
CartoCharles (2016-11-14 18:48:57+00:00): Le statut de cette route est assez ambiguë ; elle a toutes les caractéristiques d'une voie express qui doit être taguée trunk. Il manque ce panneau effectivement mais je pense que reste justifie d'utiliser trunk.
StephaneP (2016-11-14 19:38:54+00:00): Dans ce cas, ajoute tout de même motorroad=no
Johnny Mapperseed (2016-11-29 23:48:07+00:00): Is the post office really your house?
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:33:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
woodpeck_repair (2016-11-19 06:32:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43780386 where the changeset comment is: Revert mass addition of wikidata tags because of lack of prior discussion and unclear legal situation, see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=618618
user_5359 (2016-11-14 18:51:39+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! Please read the page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=isolated%20dwelling . I don’t believe, that your building is as place=isolated_dwelling.
mavl (2016-11-18 16:08:41+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
user_5359 (2016-11-14 18:53:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! I understand you addition of max speed , but I didn’t see any bridge on this part of the street.
nive (2016-11-14 17:26:24+00:00): Bonjour, pour information, uMap est là pour vous permettre de créer des cartes avec des points d'intérêts temporaires ou spécifiques comme votre RDV.

http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/
GinaroZ (2016-11-14 22:46:42+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM - thanks for your edit. Going by the aerial imagery, I've added the allotments as an area :)
glglgl (2016-11-15 08:46:00+00:00): … und Glan erweitert. Changesets sind diffizil, wenn man nicht vernünftig aufpasst…
user_242798 (2016-11-19 18:15:13+00:00): Waardenburg, Steenweg.
Hier is de weg gedeeltelijk opgesplitst in twee (oneway=yes) rijbanen.
Ook hier: het gedeelte met maar één rijbaan is een Duplicate way (fout).
In dit geval zijn óók de busroutes 'beschadigd' omdat er - in twee richtingen - busroutes overheen lopen.
Deze kunnen niet de eenrichtingsverkeers-rijbaan in beide richtingen volgen.
Dus de busroute (m.n. Bus 47 Geldermalsen Station - Gorinchem Station vv. is tweerichtingsverkeer) is stuk.

Zichtbaar op OSM Inspector, nog niet op Keep right, want deze is laatst bijgewerkt 2016-11-13 (eens per week, ongeveer)

Zie: OSM Inspector, http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/, View: Routing
mavl (2016-11-18 16:11:04+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
Commodoortje (2016-11-14 22:54:26+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-11-14 22:55:41+00:00): Zo mooi was de mutatie niet die je verricht hebt. Je hebt namelijk een node opgepakt en 134,2 meter verplaatst.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ay10kyf8zcqgqpr/2016-11-14_23-48-41.png?raw=1
Inmiddels heb ik je actie hersteld