piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:04:29+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:04:51+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:04:55+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:05:02+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:05:07+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
mwakram (2020-03-20 06:00:44+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
mwakram
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:05:13+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
mwakram (2020-03-20 06:22:46+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
mwakram
westis (2020-05-14 04:18:56+00:00): En fundering kring foot=designated och bicycle=designated. Varför har dessa taggar satts på den här lilla skogsstigen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102027678

Den ingår förvisso i en vandringsslinga, men är som sagt bara en vanlig skogsstig som inte har preparerats på något särskilt sätt.
archie (2020-05-14 04:31:59+00:00): Känner du till förhållandena på platsen, så ändra till det korrekta.
westis (2020-05-14 04:42:24+00:00): Ok. Då det var en aktiv ändring från yes till designated tänkte jag att det kanske fanns en anledning. Det är ju inte jättetydligt hur stigar ska taggas.

Jag tänker att designated är när en path är tydligt skapad för att gå och/eller cykla på, även om den inte nödvändigtvis är skyltad. Medan det bara blir yes på upptrampade stigar.
archie (2020-05-14 04:43:45+00:00): Du inser förmodligen att foot=yes, bicycle=yes och horse=yes i samband med path är obehövliga. Se: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Default. 
I den andan gjordes rensingarna i cs https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Default
archie (2020-05-14 04:51:32+00:00): Egentligen är väl skyltningen eller den lokala vägförordningen /-stadgan som är avgörande. Se: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_universal_tag

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated

Alltså min tanke var eftersom du hade lagt till foot=yes och bicycle=yes till path och detta är onödigt, så menade du egentligen foot=designated resp bicycle=designated. Det var en välvillig tolkning från min sida, som uppenbarligen var fel. Beklagar.
westis (2020-05-14 05:39:57+00:00): Ja, foot=yes och bicycle=yes är ju implicit för path. Det verkar vara en gammal kvarleva från när denna stigen skapades för nio år sedan...
westis (2020-05-14 08:27:07+00:00): Förresten, för vandringsleder, vare sig det är lokala slingor på några kilometer eller längre, bör de taggas med foot=designated? Då de är skyltade som vandringsleder är de ju uttryckligen avsedda för fotgängare.
archie (2020-05-14 09:05:22+00:00): Hm, är det inte enklare att tagga i detta fall som highway=footway?
westis (2020-05-15 08:58:09+00:00): Nej, highway=footway är en gångväg. Men det här är en stig och måste därmed vara highway=path. highway=footway ska enligt min mening enbart användas för skyltade gångvägar, alltså där det är skyltat enbart för fotgängare (till skillnad från kombinerade gång- och cykelvägar, som blir highway=path + foot=designated + bicycle=designated).

Jag försöker få igång en diskussion kring taggning av stigar & vandringsleder och har både skrivit i FB-gruppen och till mailinglistan, men verkar som att svenska OSM:are är utspridda i lite alla möjliga sammanhang, så en sammanhängande diskussion om riktlinjer är inte så enkelt att få till.
archie (2020-05-15 11:45:23+00:00): Ja, du har ju rätt i huvudsak förutom en sak. Jag kollade åter definitionen i wikin på footway. Lägg märke till "minor pathways which are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians". Det är således själva användandet "used" som är avgörande, inte skyltningen. Om du tänker dig en väg som du ofta ser tvärs över gräsmattan - en genväg - med andra ord. Den är inte skyltad som gångstig. Men du skulle nog ändå tagga den som footway och inte som path. Förmodligen med tillägget informal=yes som indikerar en slags hävdvunnen vägrätt eller ett "olagligt", faktiskt begagnande. Skillnaden i jämförelse med path är att path enl def ligger utanför "urban areas" och är öppen för andra icke-motoriserade färdmedel. Sedan kan man ju vara av delad mening om t ex en motions-/ rekreationsslinga i nära anslutning till "urban" omgivning. path eller footway? Du uppgav i ditt fall att "vägen" endast var tillåten för gångtrafik. Frågan är i detta fall huruvida man kan sätta likhetstecken mellan highway=footway eller highway=path+bicycle=no+horse=no.
westis (2020-05-17 18:46:11+00:00): Den aktuella stigen är lika öppen för MTB. Även en "desire path" är i mitt tycke en stig där även cyklar kan gena. Jag tänker mer att path till stora delar ersatte det som tidigare var footway eller cycleyway och att footway enbart används om det inte alls är tänkt att cyklister ska cykla där.

Är du med i mailinglistan Talk-se? Jag skrev en del om det där och föreslog tydligare riktlinjer för hur vi taggar olika typer av stigar och gång- och cykelvägar, såväl med highway som andra attribut (Surface, width, smoothness, trail_visibility, mtb:scale osv.), inte minst för att ge data till tjänster/appar som kan föreslå löprundor utifrån vad för typ av stigar som man vill springa på.
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:08:12+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
tastrax (2020-03-27 03:34:29+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM - Cheers
eneerhut (2020-03-27 03:43:22+00:00): Thanks for correcting @tastrax. Will be wary of that next time.
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:08:17+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
Commodoortje (2022-04-26 03:45:23+00:00): Zie nu komende edits niet als kritiek, maar als leermomenten.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782914975

Deze bewandelbare doorgang kun je nog beter taggen dmv tunnel=building_passage
https://lgms.nl/p/osm/cached-wiki/?page=Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage
Commodoortje (2022-04-26 03:50:58+00:00): Neem dan deze ook even mee
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/740511152
Deze was waarschijnlijk je voorbeeld, welke door iemand anders is aangemaakt 2 jaar geleden.
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:08:22+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:08:28+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:08:33+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
ralley (2020-03-20 07:14:57+00:00): What is the source for these changes, none of the names seem reasonable
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82418904
ralley (2020-03-20 07:14:33+00:00): Do you have a source for these changes because none of the names seem correct.  Also please use descriptive changeset comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82418972
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:08:41+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
tomhukins (2020-04-11 18:08:59+00:00): What's the reason for this change?  Given that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222071788 is a private track and it's the only way of reaching these two tracks, why does it make sense to remove "access=private" from them both?
madnikhi (2020-04-13 10:10:48+00:00): Thanks for your time for checking our edits. We are unsure of addition of access tags without any evidence, hence deleted it. However, we are continuously working to improve our editing quality in addition of access tags. we are enhancing our editing etiquette from the community feedback. Please find the changeset(83468067) for suggested modifications. Always happy to learn from the community
tomhukins (2020-04-14 09:46:02+00:00): Thank you.  I think it's important to look at the surrounding map whenever you make your edits.  In this case it seems strange to have a non-private track only reachable by a private track, so I'm pleased you have fixed this.  Also, there's no need to create a new way when you could easily extend an existing way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/780408078 could have been a continuation of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222071788 for example.
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:08:48+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:08:54+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:01+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
gohimans (2020-03-20 07:32:28+00:00): "Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
Gohimans"
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:06+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:12+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
jmapb (2020-03-21 15:48:20+00:00): Hi e pt -- can you describe your changes to the Kosciuszko Bridge? And in the future can you use a more descriptive changeset comment?

Thanks, jmapb
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:18+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:24+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-21 01:12:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82450484 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans and Germany.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3578 for more information.
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:29+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
ndm (2020-03-20 08:31:03+00:00): This looks more like a footway -- are you sure this is a service road?
amanura (2020-03-20 10:49:18+00:00): Thanks for your time for checking our edits. It was a mistake from our end. Reverting the changes as per the suggestion. Please find the changeset (82428040) for modifications. Always happy to learn from the community
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:34+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:40+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:44+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:49+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:53+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-21 01:12:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82450484 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits mainly in the Balkans and Germany.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3578 for more information.
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:09:58+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:10:01+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:10:07+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
shreeush (2020-03-23 10:10:11+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
shreeush
sgmamz (2020-03-20 09:39:25+00:00): Hi, 
These edits were made using Facebook missing road detection's #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing

Regards,
Sgmamz
amgusha (2020-04-04 20:30:52+00:00): А вы уверены, что по крайней мере тропа с id 258296177 действительно присутствует на местности? В конце этой осени тропинка с восточной стороны растворялась в лесу, дойдя до области с завалами, с западной же стороны вообще не было никаких её признаков.
ghost_07 (2020-04-04 20:46:25+00:00): Проехал там на велосипеде. Пару раз слезал из-за деревьев и грязи. Свинобайкинг, но проезжабельный
Neuwessi11 (2022-09-14 17:02:33+00:00): Hi tux67!
Osmose gibt für das Gebäude eine Fehlermeldung heraus, weil es eine Straße kreuzt.
Beim Blick ins Tagging frage ich mich allerdings, ob es sich wirklich um ein building=yes handelt, da Du gleichzeitig auch noch parking=surface getaggt hast.
Kann es sein, dass das building-Tag nur aus Versehen reingerutscht ist?
Grüße!
Neuwessi11
tux67 (2022-09-14 17:22:23+00:00): Hi,
Danke für den Hinweis. Ist bestimmt ein Fehler. Wahrscheinlich hab ich die building Funktion missbraucht und vergessen das building Tag zu entfernen.

Gruß
Tux67
tux67 (2022-09-15 05:56:10+00:00): ist gefixed.
Leo Slager (2020-03-21 00:06:15+00:00): Dag Wilco,
barrier=bollard moet dan wel blijven staan.
bollard=removable is dan de toevoeging/verbijzondering van dat paaltje.
Wilco_VR_IJsselland (2020-03-21 13:19:39+00:00): We gaan er even naar kijken / veranderen.
Bedankt voor de info / aanvulling!
Wilco_VR_IJsselland (2020-03-21 13:24:34+00:00): @leo :
Bij deze aangepast.
PanierAvide (2020-03-20 10:53:48+00:00): Bonjour,
Tout d'abord, bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap. Merci pour vos récentes contributions sur le sujet des adresses, enjeu clé pour assurer le bon fonctionnement des services de secours. Une petite remarque concernant les choix des attributs pour renseigner les adresses :
- Si le nom associé à un numéro est celui d'un lieu-dit, il est préférable d'utiliser la clé "addr:hamlet" plutôt que "addr:street"
- L'orthographe du nom de lieu-dit ou rue doit être exactement la même entre le point adresse et le reste des données (que ce soit le tracé de la rue, ou le point représentant le lieu-dit).
Ceci a pour but d'assurer une cohérence globale, et donc une meilleure pertinence de l'ensemble des données d'OpenStreetMap. Si vous avez besoin de plus d'infos, je reste à disposition. À noter que la communauté sur Rennes se réunit régulièrement (hormis en cette période de confinement), nos dates sont listées ici : http://rennes.osmfr.org
Cordialement,
Adrien.
user_2008655 (2020-03-20 09:53:18+00:00): とてもありがとう！
Ilborg (2020-04-23 17:02:05+00:00): Change is invalid. None of these sidewalks are marked as bike paths with traffic sign which means that biking is not allowed. There's no road paintings either.
scratera (2020-03-20 12:40:37+00:00): ...dire che una aiuola della rotonda sia un giardino mi sembra una forzatura
caio paolo
JuaFritz (2020-03-21 09:04:39+00:00): A me sinceramente non sembra una forzatura, perché piante e fiori coltivati a scopo ornamentale corrispondono alla definizione di giardino. Se però la mia interpretazione è sbagliata, non c'è nessun problema. Anzi sarei contento di scoprire, se esistesse, un tag più appropriato.
scratera (2020-03-21 10:01:30+00:00): landuse=grass è stato introdotto per le aree verdi delle strade
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Aiuole-nelle-piazze-e-spartitraffico-td5349585.html#a5349595
ciao paolo
JuaFritz (2020-03-21 11:24:42+00:00): Nonostante non abbia trovato risposte al perché segnare come "erba" anche le piante decorative, se questa è la prassi mi adeguo.
Grazie per la segnalazione.
gohimans (2020-03-20 10:00:21+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing.

Regards,
Gohimans
!bm (2020-03-20 12:07:07+00:00): Hey linerider! Dank deines changeset-Kommentars habe ich mir das kurz angesehen. Unglaublich, was tlw getaggt wird (kann natürlich mausgerutscht sein). Denke auch, dass "doctor" aus genanntem Grund hier falsch ist. Dank Website lernte ich, dass es "Homöosiniatrie" gibt. --besteGrüße!bm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82426216
czubi (2020-03-20 18:46:07+00:00): In den amtlichen Thüringer KArten steht Breitunger Rennsteig, du hast jetzt  Breitunger Rennweg draus gemacht. Ausserdem stand Straßenwidmung da.worauf begründen sich die Aussagen das es jetzt "nur" noch ein Forstweg ist. Welche Verkehrszeichen stehen dort?
Balewupp (2020-03-20 18:49:52+00:00): Es ist halt nur ein Forstweg, gesichert durch Schranke.
Die richtige Anfahrtsstraße (nicht asphaltiert) zum Dreiherrnstein habe ich heute korrigiert.
czubi (2020-03-20 19:04:50+00:00): Bitte erfinde keine Sachen die nicht da sind.
Und access= no bedeutet keine fußgänger, keine Radfahrer, keine Pferde, kei9ne Rettungsfahrzeuge, GARN NICHTS.
Mach bitte das access=no wieder weg und dafür dann halt die Schranke hin, da wo sie ist.
neoLithos (2020-09-12 03:48:15+00:00): Hallo Geopard.

Du hast hier dem Viertel den Namen Lindenberg gegeben. Wo hast du den Namen gefunden? Kannst du mir einen Tipp geben?

Viele Grüße, Frank.
geopard (2020-09-12 09:38:14+00:00): Hallo Frank,
die Lokalitätsbezeichnung habe ich, wenn ich mich recht erinnere, von der Bushaltestelle "Plauen-Lindenberg" übernommen. Wenn die kleine Siedlung kein Mensch vor Ort so nennt, dann raus damit.
Viele Grüße, Jan
neoLithos (2020-09-12 20:00:15+00:00): Hallo Jan.
Ich schaue kommende Woche noch einmal in Ruhe. Vielleicht habe ich nur ein Schild übersehen.
Viele Grüße und schönes Wochenende, Frank.
RicoElectrico (2020-03-20 11:44:17+00:00): Cześć, domyślam się, że te uwagi są Twojego autorstwa? Jako że sam poprawiłeś, możesz je zamknąć :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2125393 https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2125394
RicoElectrico (2020-03-20 11:46:24+00:00): Oraz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2125395 
Tu swoją drogą poprawiłem Twoje oznaczenie, zobacz jak jest teraz.
whb (2023-04-24 10:11:07+00:00): Guten Tag Andi_Dingsda,

die komplette Sperrung der Wege für Kraftfahrzeuge erscheint mir wenig plausibel.
Sind diese Wege wirklich nicht zumindest für landwirtschaftlichen und/oder forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr freigegeben?

Viele Grüße
whb
whb (2024-10-30 09:29:52+00:00): Wurde jetzt verbessert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158518576
hauke-stieler (2020-03-20 12:31:27+00:00): Hi,
ich wollte nur anmerken, dass man bei der Nutzung von "door=*" auch "entrance=*" mit angeben sollte, damit klar ist ob diese Tür ein Eingang ist und wenn ja was für eine Art von Eingang.

Der entsprechende Wiki-Artikel zu "door=*": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:door

Grüße
Hauke
yadathot (2020-03-20 10:56:35+00:00): Edited Highway tag and added Service road, barrier  Modified the geometry of the roads as per latest imagery's as per Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.
Mike Raust (2020-09-18 11:45:50+00:00): Good changes deserve a better changeset comment than "ppppppp"!
user_5359 (2020-03-21 11:25:56+00:00): Hello! Please check the tags of the way https://www.osm.org/way/783016511. What is the meaning of the tag -=multi.
user_1207217 (2020-03-21 13:24:57+00:00): Hi, i have delete the tag=multi. A fault from me.
gdo34 (2020-03-25 10:11:17+00:00): Ce commerce est fermé définitivement
James_OWORNTE (2026-03-28 15:34:28+00:00): Thank you for your contribution! The task was well mapped. I simplified some objects that were mapped with too many nodes, using SHIFT+Y in JOSM. Once again, thank you for your participation!
czubi (2020-03-20 18:29:28+00:00): warum hast du hier das "dreiherrenstein" gelöscht?
DUGA (2021-02-13 03:34:36+00:00): You caused more trouble because an illegal turn was added.
kanleela (2021-02-15 09:10:03+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect addition of road, will ensure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you. Happy mapping!

Regards,
kanleela.
czubi (2020-03-20 18:11:26+00:00): Hallo, du hattes gebeten das sich jemnd deine CS anschaut.
Einige Kleinigkeiten. 
Dreiherrenstein ist falsch geschrieben, am Board.
name ist the name only. name bitte nur und ausschließlich für Eigennamen verwenden. Sachen wie "2 Schutzhütten" ist kein Eigenname sondern eine Beschreibung und gehört da auch nicht dran, wenn du nicht drauf verzichen willst dann unter description.
czubi (2020-03-20 18:15:42+00:00): acess=no ist eigentlich immer falsch.
such dir das richtige Verkehrsmittel (hier vermutlich motor_vehicle)
czubi (2020-03-20 18:17:20+00:00): Sollen das hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2710553341
board und Rettungspunkt in einem sein?. Wenn ja bitte Rettungspunkt berichtigen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Demergency_access_point 
und vom Board trennen
czubi (2020-03-20 18:20:00+00:00): Wenn es 2 Schutzhütten sind mach auch 2 nodes hin. Die Lage der Objekte könnte noch verbessert werden.
GUT: Bleibe als Anfänger bei kleinen Cangesets die kann man gut kontrollieren.