piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cadsauxk (2017-01-18 23:35:36+00:00): Olá ItaloBruno eu reacertei a sua edição. Da maneira como estava não daria certo. O que  você tentou fazer é bastante complexo para um usuário sem experiência. Entre em contato se você quiser alguma orientação ou dicas de edição.
abraço
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:36:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:36:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:28:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:03:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:38:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:24:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
peter_james (2017-01-10 17:59:04+00:00): I had put the changeset comment as "Preston: Fishergate and Friargate shops" but JOSM uploaded the comment that was there before.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
dgitto (2017-01-10 18:12:13+00:00): Ciao, Benvenuto in OSM. Cosa intendevi con footprint? "footprint" non può certamente essere un "name"
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:33:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:26:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
KKS (2017-01-12 19:28:14+00:00): Вітаю, я можливо вже питав, але я забув відповідь :)

От ви мапите заказники по Поліссю, у вас є якась мапа чи просто перелік що от є такий заказник з такою назвою і з такою то флорою. А вже кордони ви самі ставите на око... так? Якщо є карта - то я б хотів її побачити. Не те що шось не так, просто хотів би мати таку і в себе. Дякую.
freakmonk (2017-01-12 19:34:25+00:00): Добрый вечер.
Карты есть в сканах всех заказников области.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4i6YSx98wg7ci13Yk9GY2llLTQ/view
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4i6YSx98wg7aHdmMnpfSDY3ZDA/view
KKS (2017-01-12 20:06:36+00:00): Величезне ДЯКУЮ!
freakmonk (2017-01-12 20:49:17+00:00): Не за что) еще есть карты лесхозов с нумерацией квадратов. Тут правда что б скачать надо зарегестрироваться и загрузить любой документ, но у себя не нашел. http://www.scribd.com/doc/73332499/Zhytomyr-Dovidnyk
freakmonk (2017-01-12 20:56:41+00:00): Вот еще брошюра без карт но с подробным описанием некоторой части заказников. http://libo.lib.zt.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/439
KKS (2017-01-15 23:53:22+00:00): Дякую величезне і за квартали лісові (вдалось скачати як pdf) і за довідник по природо-заповідному фонду. Цікаво було прочитати про сам заказник.
BtPht (2017-01-10 18:29:18+00:00): Wrong commit message (not my first)

Actually changed a lot of things, opening hours of various places according to their website. Changed two companies information. Added missing walking paths and small details around.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:16:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:19:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
dgitto (2017-01-10 19:13:27+00:00): Per favore mi spieghi cosa vuoi fare? hai cancellato anche alcune cose stavolta
please can you explain me your intention?
pjx1120 (2017-01-11 00:16:08+00:00): I am trying to add some footprint so I  can use the data to build better model.
dgitto (2017-01-11 01:26:05+00:00): do you mean "better model" in OSM? sorry is not the right way. Does not exists any object called "footprint". Are you in Milazzo at present?
pjx1120 (2017-01-11 08:41:42+00:00): Hi, firstly I am sorry for making troubles. Basically, I am trying to use OSM DATA to create city master plan of milazzo. However, there are no data about footprint. I has jsut left milazzo. BY anychance do you know anywhere I can download or ask milazzo masterplan (DWG) ?

Also I will stop editng the data sorry for trouble.
Thank you
Walter Schlögl (2017-01-18 22:04:32+00:00): Laut basemap.at ist der Name Hauptstraße, das kann aber auch falsch sein, siehe hier: http://www.strassen-in-oesterreich.at/35580308-badener-strasse-in-felixdorf.html

Bitte klären, wie diese Straße wirklich heißt.
Megiga (2017-01-19 07:51:28+00:00): Prinzipiell heisst die Strasse von Ortsgrenze zu Ortsgrenze Hauptstrasse. Die Strasse hat NIE Badnerstrasse geheissen sondern max. Gutensteiner Bundesstrasse.
Des weiteren stimmt auch der Zusatz B21a NICHT mehr.
Seit der Eröffnung der Umfahrung Sollenau -Theresienfeld (neue B17) ist die Strasse wieder in das Eingentum der Gemeinde Felixdorf übergegangen und ist somit kein Bundesstrasse mehr!
mapper999 (2017-01-13 20:58:46+00:00): Could you have a look at http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=94&error=81426259&zoom=17&lat=49.29215&lon=8.66712&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C350%2C380%2C411%2C412&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1 please? You left some untagged ways and not properly connected junctions.
sladen (2017-01-13 21:33:04+00:00): …Marked a large number of false positive.  The untagged ways are template lines (circles and parallel lines use for constructions of arcs and outlines); and where, once created it makes sense to keep these in the map to all re-rectifying.
tyr_asd (2017-01-17 13:59:05+00:00): sorry, I don't get it. Why would it make sense to keep your "templates" in the DB? Couldn't you just store them in a local .osm file on your PC, if you need them again at some point in the future?
sladen (2017-01-17 14:07:10+00:00): @tyr_asd: why would I necessary be the person doing the next edit?  The intent behind OSM is to enable access and equal ability-to-contribute by all.

Storing some work offline, but other work online creates an imbalance between contributors.  A similiar situation can occur when GPS traces were used, but are not available: therefore OSM has a mechanism for uploading GPS traces, which can then be accessed by all, equally.
tyr_asd (2017-01-17 14:31:25+00:00): Hmm. Yes, but if I were the next editor, I wouldn't know how to use your data. In fact, it would possibly even hinder any further editing: for example, I wouldn't know if I can remove these lines that don't correspond to any actual feature on the ground or not.

While I partially understand the motivation behind keeping the two circles (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464954584)*, for me it is totally unclear what the remaining lines are good for. For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465011450 or http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464954580 – can you explain why we need those? If yes: at least, please add a note tag explaining how they are intended to be used by your fellow mappers.

My point is that if only you know how to use it, that data is indistinguishable from garbage for everyone else. You can't compare that to OSM's GPS traces, where the functionality and intended usage is well documented. Thanks for understanding. :)

* but even those could be redrawn very quickly by the next mapper in case they want to adjust the tracks while keeping the perfect round shape.
mapper999 (2017-01-22 19:04:37+00:00): I generally don't have a problem with template lines, but please give them at least a note tag so that other mappers know how to use them and they don't show up in QA tools. Sometimes it also helps to use noexit=yes, when ways are not connected.
sladen (2017-01-22 20:16:22+00:00): @tyr_asd, 456011450 has been tagged with an additional 'note='; and 464954580 has been deleted.  Thank you for highlighting these.  Imagery, photographs, GPS traces, surveys, measurements, and derived template lines all form a basis for cartography.  Ever little helps, and any individual cartographer can only work from the selection they have before them.  With OSM the aim is to share, to allow equal contribution by all.

@mapper999: Yes, definitely!
tyr_asd (2017-01-22 20:37:32+00:00): Thanks @sladen!
syntex (2021-09-13 22:38:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465012109 To jest staw, nie drzewa
dan980 (2017-01-11 18:39:28+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto/a su Openstretmap! Ho notato che hai aggiunto un punto di interesse etichettato come tourism=artwork, che però va usato per una singola opera d'arte (es. una statua o un murales). Mi sembra di capire che si tratta dello studio di un artigiano che realizza ceramiche, l'etichetta più appropriata in questo caso è craft=pottery
FraMauro (2017-01-17 12:33:11+00:00): Mi associo al benvenuto!
Integrerò il punto con le informazioni visibili sul sito http://www.giampaolomameli.it/
Visto che ci sono farò anche la modifica suggerita da dan980.
In caso di problemi puoi fare ulteriori modifiche e/o contattarmi
Bonix-Mapper (2017-01-12 06:58:36+00:00): Olá Edney,

Gostaria de sugerir que a sua descrição tivesse mais detalhes do que foi adicionado, modificado ou apagado.

Do contrário, a única forma de revisar a edição é com o editor ID ou JOSM, o que torna o processo mais lento.

Bem-vindo ao OSM.
alphensebezorger (2017-01-13 22:31:29+00:00): Hallo Jaap, het lijkt me dat het adres nog wel bestaat. In de geschiedenis is te zien dat dit punt oorspronkelijk als adres vanuit BAG is geïmporteerd. Later zijn de extra tags over huiswerkbegeleding toegevoegd. Die hadden gewist moeten worden, maar het punt zelf had moeten blijven bestaan. Zie http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2769017569/history.
Kun je zelf versie 4 van node 2769017569 op de kaart zetten met dezelfde gegevens als versie 1?
Grtz.
Commodoortje (2017-01-13 23:53:46+00:00): Jaap, ik begrijp het denk ik niet helemaal goed. Je hebt in deze changeset 2 poi's verwijderd die een nieuwe mapper heeft aangebracht. Waarom verwijder je ze?
Is hier een reden voor?
Persoonlijk lijkt me dat deze changeset gerevert zou moeten worden en daarna hulp bieden aan de nieuwe mapper om de juiste tagging te plaatsen.
Heb je overlegd met de nieuwe mapper?
Is het op haar verzoek gebeurd?

Veel vragen maar nu lijkt het een beetje op sensuur.
Commodoortje (2017-01-13 23:55:29+00:00): censuur is natuurlijk met een c.
jaap de vries (2017-01-14 00:01:47+00:00): Het betref deze opmerking Opgeloste opmerking #845308
Beschrijving

The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground. (OSM data version: 2016-12-14T16:41:03Z) #mapsme
6 dagen geleden aangemaakt door Alice van der Linden 
3 dagen geleden opgelost door jaap de vries
In deze opmerking staan reacties van anonieme gebruikers die moeten worden gecontroleerd.

Reactie van jaap de vries 4 dagen geleden
wat wil je aan ons vertellen met deze engelse tekst van maps.me?
Reactie van anoniem 4 dagen geleden.
Kan de huiswerkbegeleiding gedelete worden op deze lokatie?
Reactie van Alice van der Linden 3 dagen geleden
Ook is er geen school! 
Bij voorbaat dank!
3 dagen geleden opgelost door jaap de vries
Heb het voor je weggehaald, maar wat ik ZEER vreemd vond is dat je deze poi zelf hebt bijgewerkt.
Updated a school
3 dagen geleden bewerkt door Alice van der Linden
Versie #2 · Wijzigingenset #44983163 
Locatie: 52,0074102, 5,8768914 
Labels
addr:city	Arnhem 
addr:housenumber	33 
addr:postcode	6816 PR 
addr:street	Menthenbergseweg 
amenity	school 
name	Huiswerkbegeleiding 
name:en	Homework assistance 
source	BAG 
source:date	2014-03-24
Nieuwe mapper heeft zelf iets aangemaakt maar later toch bedacht dat het niet klopt en via deze opmerking willen aangeven dat het niet op de kaart moet. Dat is natuurijk wel aan de vreemde kant
jaap de vries (2017-01-14 00:03:45+00:00): Als jij anders denkt dat die anders moet dan kan je dit zelf beter reverten of eerder reageren op opmerkingen rode pijltjes op de kaart.
Commodoortje (2017-01-14 00:16:19+00:00): toevallig dat het onder ogen kwam. Ik bedoel zeker niet dat ik het beter zou weten dan jij als je dat bedoeld.
Wel vind ik dat beginnende mappers gehoord moeten worden. Als ik de opmerking zo lees bestaat de huiswerkbebegeleiding wel degelijk.
We wachten even wat Alice er van zegt.
Ik heb een aanvulling op de opmerking achtergelaten.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/845308
jaap de vries (2017-01-14 00:21:15+00:00): Ik lees/ begrijp dit:
anoniem reageert (alice) dat er geen huiswerkbegeleiding is en gevraag wordt of dit gedelete mag worden. Daarna login Alice dat poi school ook weg mag.
Ook via google en gemeente Arnhem gegevens over huiswerkbegeleiding al dan niet prive als professional komt Menthenbergseweg 33 niet naar boven. 
Maar misschien is het wijs dat jij even een pb stuurt naar Alice, dat heb ik ook gedaan en kreeg bovenstaande informatie terug.
Succes er mee, Jaap
Commodoortje (2017-01-14 01:21:29+00:00): jammer....
Ik denk dat ze teleurgesteld is omdat ze school moest kiezen, en dat dekt de lading niet. Huiswerkbegeleiding is inderdaad iets anders.
Afgezien van bovenstaande waarom delete je dan de gehele node. Zoals alphensebezorger al vroeg het huis heeft nog steeds een adresnode nodig.
Daarnaast heb je ook een 2e poi gedelete in je changeset.
De url was opgenomen in deze node en bestaat gewoon.
http://www.smartphoneles.eu
.
Heb je antwoord op je pb gekregen?
Nogmaals, het gaat er niet om of ik het beter weet, mij gaat het erom dat iemand de moeite doet om aanvullingen op OSM te zetten niet geholpen wordt door een wat ervaren mapper zoals jij (of ik)
We weten allebei dat MAPS.ME niet de ideale editor is, maar het is aan ons om deze informatie te verbeteren en terug te koppelen aan de aanbrenger, zodat deze een keus kan maken om zich verder te verdiepen in OSM.
Commodoortje (2017-01-14 01:25:43+00:00): Hetzelfde geld voor de (museum)node die je hebt verwijderd.
Nu heeft het pand geen adresnode meer.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288638966
Commodoortje (2017-01-14 01:26:56+00:00): Zie hiervoor:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45061435
keithonearth (2017-01-11 02:08:33+00:00): Species? What does this edit summary mean?
Karthoo (2017-01-11 10:06:53+00:00): He edited the species tag at trees and hedges
gileri (2017-01-11 18:44:28+00:00): I agree it's sort of short for a changeset this large
Chrysopras (2017-01-31 09:50:19+00:00): And this kind of mass-change of many objects should probably be considered as a mechanical edit. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct and the discussion at another changeset of the same kind: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45649120
Commodoortje (2017-01-11 08:55:56+00:00): adresnode nr 37 is nog aanwezig.
Commodoortje (2017-01-14 18:16:52+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-11 08:57:28+00:00): adresnode 44 is niet meegekomen denk ik.
Alexander-II (2017-01-10 21:50:59+00:00): У вас в макдональдсе указано internet_access:fee=yes. Они убрали бесплатный интернет? :)
literan (2017-01-11 11:28:37+00:00): нет там никакого макдональдса, он через дорогу. откатываю
literan (2017-01-11 11:29:33+00:00): хотя, похоже, все верно, открыли новый.
Hjart (2017-01-10 21:45:17+00:00): Vær opmærksom på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Adresser
Commodoortje (2017-01-11 08:42:29+00:00): Martin, wil je de Josm validator nog een keer over dit gebied halen. Er staan veel fouten in veroorzaakt door het importeren.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/j63wjsqe3p4vfo8/2017-01-11_09-42-06.png?raw=1
Commodoortje (2017-01-11 08:41:38+00:00): Martin, wil je de Josm validator nog een keer over dit gebied halen. Er staan veel fouten in veroorzaakt door het importeren.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ugcvs2znc449f3x/2017-01-11_09-41-19.png?raw=1
letihu (2017-03-29 13:37:00+00:00): Alles doppelt?
Martin Borsje (2017-03-29 14:20:27+00:00): I will check tnght
Martin Borsje (2017-03-29 17:40:07+00:00): Volgens mij alles netjes gemaakt; niet alle bestaande gebouwen staan in de BAG
Grillo (2017-01-13 11:13:34+00:00): Hej, här ligger det en villatomt enligt vad vi kan se på flygbilder. Du har kanske placerat Jonsparken på fel plats. Dessutom ansluter inte gångstigarna till övriga vägnätet. Jag tog bort delen av parken som ingår i villatomten men lät det andra vara kvar. Skrik gärna till om jag missförstått.
Commodoortje (2017-01-11 08:40:49+00:00): Martin, wil je de Josm validator nog een keer over dit gebied halen. Er staan veel fouten in veroorzaakt door het importeren.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/rtsza07wx12qlbl/2017-01-11_09-40-16.png?raw=1
Commodoortje (2017-01-11 08:39:14+00:00): Martin, wil je de Josm validator nog een keer over dit gebied halen. Er staan veel fouten in veroorzaakt door het importeren.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/3absix4cornb64l/2017-01-11_09-35-16.png?raw=1
Hjart (2017-01-10 22:04:02+00:00): Jeg havde ellers lige rullet din ændring tilbage
chillly (2017-01-10 21:59:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM,
You seem to have been doodling with the school outline. In your next edit you have added a park that looks like the school field to me. Maybe you didn't realise that you were saving to the public site. Maybe you thought you could entice Pokémon to the imaginary you will be disappointed :-).

If you need help either cleaning this up or with real mapping (we'd love to have you add real stuff to the map) just ask.
Marko123456 (2017-01-10 22:11:03+00:00): Hi, Not at all i live in the local area and the Park is nothing to do with the Highfield hall school. It's a public park and where i mark the outline was where the park and school seperate.
chillly (2017-01-10 22:13:01+00:00): OK, but the way you have drawn the school outline needs some attention. The line doubles back on itself. Do you need any help?