piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
CJY (2020-09-22 15:25:49+00:00): Thanks Bernard. Whilst away I was using a touchscreen tablet to make some minor corrections following a walk and must have inadvertantly dragged the outline.
eggie (2020-09-20 20:48:06+00:00): Zodra je ziet da je opeens een groot gebied ziet in je changeset klopt er iets niet. je hebt het fietspad verbonden met de landuse=residential. Hier kun je dat zien
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91187556
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-09-20 20:55:45+00:00): pad losgemaakt van landuse en goedgelegd.. Fietspad gelijk maar uit de sloot gehaald en ook in positie gelegd volgens BGT
G_Bartels (2020-09-20 21:03:36+00:00): Bedankt. Dacht dat ik de voetweg aan de Thorbeckerstraat en de fietspad bij de Troelstraweg vast gemaakt had. Verder niets aangepast.
eggie (2020-09-20 21:19:47+00:00): Dat plakken gaat onbedoeld.. gebruik de linker alttoets bij intekenen. Dat voorkomt plakken.
Bij josm gebruik je de ctrl toets.
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 09:00:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.
user_2066394 (2020-09-21 09:42:53+00:00): covid19 details?
eggie (2020-09-20 20:37:23+00:00): Het pad heb ik goedgelegd..  Wanener je zou overschakelen naar editor JOSM kun je een transparant van de BGT omtrekgericht op de achtergrond zetten. In Nederland is alles ingemeten.
G_Bartels (2020-09-20 20:40:51+00:00): Bedankt :-)
Cartographer10 (2020-09-20 20:57:10+00:00): Indien je weet wat er in de container mag, dan kun je dat ook toevoegen. Kijk maar eens op onderstaande wiki voor voorbeelden. Opmerking: een glasbak is vaak recyling:glass_bottle=yes en niet recyling:glass=yes (glass is glas in zijn algemeenheid, dus ook platen glas waar er vaak alleen maar fless in passen)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling
G_Bartels (2020-09-20 21:05:56+00:00): Ga ik toevoegen. Een groenbak, meerdere grofvuil en meerdere papier zijn er.
jaap de vries (2020-09-21 07:25:49+00:00): Dit zijn containers alleen voor de studenten woningen, het is net een kleine milieustraat hier zoals bij het Nudepark. Goed alles benoemen hier.
mueschel (2020-09-23 16:57:10+00:00): Hi,
please check the fuel tags on this POI - most of them are not documented in the Wiki. Could you have a look and change them to common ones?
fuel:Benzin 
fuel:بنزین 
fuel:بنزین_سوپر 
fuel:بنزین_معمولی
LudovicG (2025-08-01 17:02:26+00:00): Ah bah, je tourne en rond :)
Je voulais ajouter https://manoirplessis.fr sur le manoir du Plessis. Votre avis : j'ajoute un node pour l'aspect commerciale ou je mets sur le bâtiment directement ?
camelCaseNick (2020-09-21 00:59:28+00:00): You could have just deleted the node, but yeah. Thanks.
camelCaseNick (2020-09-21 01:10:27+00:00): (I mean't "Thanks." as in "Thanks, for catching.", the prior message could have suggested an ironic meaning.)
tux67 (2020-09-21 05:54:57+00:00): Hi endradon,
kannst du beim Hochladen der Daten bitte auch immer eine Quellenangabe machen. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#.C3.9Cberpr.C3.BCfbarkeit
Danke & Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91188148
gileri (2020-09-21 11:06:04+00:00): Hello,

What source did you use for this change ?

I went a few weeks back and remember faintly that it was permanently closed, and that is confirmed by Google Maps [1] and Midas' website [2]. Has it reopened ?

[1] https://www.google.fr/maps/place/Midas/@45.7280252,4.8855319,17z/data=!4m8!1m2!2m1!1smidas+pinel!3m4!1s0x47f4c1f52e68b37f:0x26ed1c76084cf0f6!8m2!3d45.7254014!4d4.8866858?hl=en

[2] https://www.midas.fr/stores/search?latitude=45.7315386&longitude=4.869616499999999&place=69008%20Lyon,%20France
literan (2020-09-21 21:05:36+00:00): типы улиц (улица, проезд, проспект и т.п.) по соглашению пишутся с маленькой буквы
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-11-24 08:09:52+00:00): What is the source of your edits? Of all that Midas repair shops?
jleedev (2020-11-11 15:15:40+00:00): I'm very curious if there's a source for these names.
aceman444 (2020-10-26 00:53:31+00:00): I don't see why you had to delete my crossing at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235117388, when you then just added it again :(
jurajik82 (2020-10-26 22:02:24+00:00): I always try to not delete anything that is not necessary. But sometimes it's not possible. I don't remember what exactly was a problem here. I just wanted to have crossings to correspond more to reality than simplified sketch in OSM.
aceman444 (2020-10-29 10:37:25+00:00): I do not see any improvement in tagging or geometry between mine (deleted) and your new way: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=91188860
Ok, let's assume it was a random occurrence.
jurajik82 (2020-10-29 23:15:54+00:00): Sorry. I merged pedestrian crossings paths together and separated crossing of pedestrians from cyclists so that I could direct cycleway crossing besides pedestrian crossing (from Trencianska to Dulovo nam.) as it is in reality and then cycleway on the right of road. But as cycleway lane is tagged on road with all information (except maybe width) and also there is tag cycleway=crossing on that pedestrian crossing node it seems now unnecessary. However in wiki Tag:cycleway=crossing they say it should not be used on nodes. And wiki Tag:footway=crossing shows completely different approach for combined foot and cycle crossing. In this particular case maybe it should stay as it is and crossing of bicycles with cars should be deduced by osmand somehow from cycleway connecting node from which cycle lane is emerging on the right.
Sorry again.
PT-53 (2020-09-21 05:59:50+00:00): HalloLArn,
Danke für die Ergänzung der Hausnummern. Könntest Du auch noch die Straße (im Feld addr:street) eintragen? Sonst können die Hausnummern nicht für das Routing verwendet werden.
Grüße
ToniE (2020-09-21 08:43:14+00:00): Servus cl0u,

willkommen bei OSM.

Nur zur Info:

'light_rail' gibt es bei der Infrastruktur von Bahnen, spriche wenn es um die Gleise geht.

bei type=route_master/route gibt es route_master/route=light_rail jedoch nicht. 
Hierdurch werden nur die Verkehrsverbindungen bemaped.

Es gab diesbezüglich schon viele strittige Diskussionen in Forum (forum.openstreetmap.org). Der Konsens ist allerdings: route=train nicht nach route=light_rail zu ändern.

bzgl. Qualitätssicherung bei SPNV/ÖPNV siehe auch hier:
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de

Viele Grüße,
Toni
zuicz (2020-12-12 20:49:32+00:00): Czemu są dwie drogi jednocześnie w budowie?
Perimex (2020-12-13 10:58:53+00:00): Pytanie, która wersja jest w realizacji?
zuicz (2020-12-13 17:37:17+00:00): Według autora drugiej nitki ta jego jest właściwa
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95513434
Simon270 (2020-09-20 21:50:25+00:00): I see I've messed this up and and changed the track into a fence, which wasn't my intention - apparently I can't create a fence node. I'm looking to see how to revert the change, if someone else gets there first please do so, thanks and sorry!
Cebderby (2020-09-20 22:25:22+00:00): Hi Simon270,
There's a nice tool:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91189397
(keep the link and just change the number on the end to see other changesets) where you can see what all the tag values were before and after, so you can put things back as you need to.  You can have a gate as a point on a way, but sounds like a fence is right so you can draw a line across the track (including a node shared with the track) and tag that as fence.  You can also usefully divide the track and mark the inaccessible part as access=private if you know how much of it is likely blocked off (or just mark a short length of the track as access=private the other side of the fence) then no-one should get routed along it.
Cebderby (Clive)
BTH (2021-12-01 09:31:14+00:00): Cavité sensible soumise à conditions d'accès.
*Martin* (2020-10-18 06:48:42+00:00): Ahoj. Podarilo sa ti spravit z takmer celej obce Hrabusice okrasnu zahradu. Nemyslim, ze si to chcel. Okrasne zahradky vsade - pod domami, na ulici, na poliach.

Ak presne vies, ktore kusky travnika ci zahradok su pestovane "na relaxacne ucely", tak tieto tak oznacit mozes. Ale tam kde ludia pestuju mrkvu, ci zemiaky, tak tie policka budu skor landuse=farmland. A urcite na tom nepostavili svoje domy alebo na tom chovaju svoje sliepky. Prosim oprav to (zmaz tie plochy). Vdala.
Dobinger (2020-10-21 18:17:53+00:00): Hi 
according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden

Description
A garden can have aesthetic, functional, and recreational uses:
* Cooperation with nature
* Observation of nature
* Relaxation
* Growing useful produce

IMHO there are a lot of gardens, some have only flowers/trees etc. quite a lot produce crops like fruits/vegetables..

but if you disagree it is up to you to change the tagging
aceman444 (2020-10-29 14:52:58+00:00): There is no problem with the tagging (albeit you should have added garden:type=residential), but that you made it a single village-wide area, thus also under buildings. That is wrong. So please mark individual plots, or at least the areas in the yards in the back of the houses. But there is no garden where the streets run.
nitram1234 (2020-09-28 10:56:50+00:00): Hi thanks for mapping! For the next time, could you please try to only edit stuff in one area at a time? This helps others trying to review edits in a certain area. Thanks a bunch in advance. Cheers!
stlmapper74 (2020-10-17 22:11:10+00:00): Not opposed to this, if indeed the school did name these routes. Do you have any type of documentation to confirm this? If so, please link.
abakus_uploader (2020-09-21 22:30:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Brush Studio (2020-10-11 04:12:54+00:00): This is not showing correctly on my facebook but shows correct here please help
SomeoneElse (2020-10-11 10:49:17+00:00): You'll need to contact Facebook about that, unfortunately - Facebook don't use OpenStreetMap for their "places" data, just the background maps.
Saxonyking (2020-12-02 15:38:01+00:00): Hallo, warum wurden die ganzen Hausnummern-Nodes  entfernt und an die Häuser geheftet?
syntex (2023-08-31 11:24:48+00:00): Nie ma tu przystanku
jimkats (2022-07-04 17:02:20+00:00): Σε αυτό το παλιό changeset χάλασες έναν δρόμο που πήγαινε ευθεία για χάρη των ¨καμπυλώσεων". Πρέπει να κόψεις αυτό το στυλ της "ωραιοποίησης" που δεν συνάδει πολλές φορές με την πραγματικότητα και καταστρέφει το routing κάποιες φορές.
tudacs (2020-09-21 08:42:17+00:00): Danke für die Info an der Note und den Änderungssatz. Generell ist die Frage des Getrennt oder Zusammen-mappens ja ziemlich kontrovers diskutiert und es gibt bei beiden Varianten Vorzüge und Nachteile. Dem letztes Jahr vorangegangenen #detailmappingHD (siehe Forum und Wiki) waren bei der Erstellung der Fußwege Eigenschaften wie Oberfläche, etc. wichtig. In den Bereichen, in denen sich ohne Informationsverlust diese extra Wege auflösen ließen hatte ich das schon weitgehend bereinigt.

Könnten Sie bitte im Hinblick auf das Erhalten von Daten über Ihren Changeset drüberschauen und ggf. Attribute der Gehwege an die Straße übertragen? Ich war, wo nötig, dem Schema sidewalk:<seite>:<eigenschaft> gefolgt. Ein Beispiel stellt die Lutherstraße, südlicher Teil, dar (Linie 845689914).
debfreak (2020-09-21 11:23:49+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich werde schauen was sich aus den Daten noch sinnvoll übertragen lässt. 

Ja die kontroverse Diskussion ist mir auch bekannt. Als Mapper zähle ich mich da eher zur Fraktion "keep it simple" ;) aber dafür möglichst aktuell und vollständig. 

So wie es hier gemacht wurde finde ich nicht wirklich gut. Halb angefangen und dann aufgehört. In diesem Zustand bringt es keinem wirklich einen Mehrwert außer unnötigem Wartungsaufwand wie man jetzt wieder sieht ;)
bikingaround244 (2022-01-21 17:45:01+00:00): hello,

I noticed you marked the ways on the dam as bicycles not allowed (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833915147/history). I bike over it twice a day and so do a lot of other people. I dislike biking over it but the only other option would biking over North Washington St bridge and that is just asking to die. Untill the North Washington st Bridge is finished (https://www.mass.gov/north-washington-street-bridge-replacement) I think we should allow bikes to cross the damn thing. There is a sign at the start of the damn that says dismount to bicycles other then that bicycles are allowed over this bridge.
Arma IRM-ED (2021-07-07 06:20:58+00:00): Halo, AlejandroAlba
Gracias por su contribución a OSM

Encontré que su objeto (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/849610526) tiene cruces no válidos. Dado que necesita conocimiento local, ¿le importaría arreglarlo? ¿O tienes alguna sugerencia sobre qué debo hacer? Gracias
SomeoneElse (2020-09-21 00:21:21+00:00): Hello again, archie
As mentioned previously, please use meaningful changeset comments. Having lots and lots of changes with a description of "(no comment)" doesnt really help other mappers understand what changes you're making. 
This was mentioned previously at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85167598 (by me) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88680694 (by a different mapper).
Best Regards,
Andy
vsahith (2020-09-20 23:59:30+00:00): split the road into dual carriageway as per Private Maxar imagery.
dgitto (2020-09-24 15:13:23+00:00): va benissimo, ma considera che non era un "buco". il fatto che l'area da ortofoto non sia visibile non c'entra nulla col database OSM.
Non si mappa per il risultato grafico, è una regola
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Non_mappare_per_il_rendering
MerlinPendragon (2020-09-21 15:15:47+00:00): Just a small note on adding addresses to building entrances: Typically you would only add an address if each door leads to a different address. If there are multiple doors to enter a building with the same address (like with Smith-Steeb and Park-Stradley Halls), the address should be applied to the building itself, not the entrances.
Figgy_c (2020-09-21 23:55:48+00:00): Thanks for the clarification, wasn't sure and went with overkill.
MerlinPendragon (2020-09-21 23:59:17+00:00): When in doubt, the OSM wiki is always a good place to check:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance#Entrances_and_addresses
Heidi_B (2021-06-04 21:36:31+00:00): Do you have any sources that verify this name? I was unable to find any. It is not on the Clayton Campus map either. https://www.monash.edu/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/844234/Clayton-Gardens-Location-Map.pdf. I appreciate it's based on local knowledge, but given that it appears to be inaccurate/vandalistic and does not come up in any searches, you should consider using a different name tag such as loc_name since it seems to be a colloquial name as opposed to a primary name. Thank you!
Heidi_B (2021-06-04 21:43:20+00:00): Including link to name tag on OSM Wiki for context;
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
mapper999 (2021-02-20 14:17:54+00:00): Hi, please use highway=speed_camera only for real speed cameras and not for maxheight enforcement sensors like this one.
L___I (2021-03-10 07:54:07+00:00): Hi, just noticed your message. Thanks of info'. Seems was a oversight. Thanks also for the reverting of the entire deleting of the node. Added now some more details (at least first level tagging and so on), see https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/2271439065
mariotomo (2020-09-21 12:08:26+00:00): hola. en el grupo Telegram sobre OSM-Panamá tenemos otros maperos interesados a las ciclovías. 
https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
mariotomo (2020-11-06 16:27:32+00:00): también te pueden ayudar en evitar errores como los que hiciste aquí: calles cruzando sin punto en común.
Kai Johnson (2023-03-05 17:36:25+00:00): Should the protected areas in this changeset have admin_level=4?
ZeLonewolf (2023-03-05 17:42:09+00:00): At the time there were active discussions on how to tag State Parks, and this was something I came up with at the time to express the concept. If I were tagging it today, I'd probably change it to leisure=nature_reserve or boundary=protected_area + protected_area=recreation, perhaps with a protect_class=5 to preserve osm-carto compatibility. There's some extensive discussions in the #protected_area channel in Slack. Feel free to improve the tagging if you like.
Kai Johnson (2023-03-05 17:48:22+00:00): I was doing a query on admin_level=4 features in the US to collect some information about state boundaries and these relations ended up in the data set. At the very least, I might drop that tag from the relations.
axelr (2020-09-23 00:01:39+00:00): Bist du sicher, dass die Busse nicht mehr hierher fahren ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24889796
wermak (2020-09-23 05:14:53+00:00): Habe es wieder korrigiert, danke.
Carnildo (2020-09-21 10:20:17+00:00): You appear to have deleted a couple of fairly significant Forest Service roads here (NFD 550 and NFD 570).  Is there a reason for that?
deven_smith_ (2020-09-21 21:09:05+00:00): Ah shoot, no. I was going to replace them redrawn with current day imagery and then I got distracted. I'll get to fixing that now
ralley (2020-10-08 18:18:47+00:00): This is a cycleway, both according to Auckland Transport (see https://data-aucklandcouncil.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/4ebe4795243146ad930ff51bc07a6ea1) and local knowledge - I as do many others personally ride it.  The fact it is gravel does not make it only a footway and any router should be capable of recognising the surface tag.
callum_AT (2020-10-08 21:13:48+00:00): Good point, I hadn't considered that properly. Have corrected this - thanks for raising!
CupIvan (2020-09-24 04:35:07+00:00): привет! постарайся правильно выбирать тип дороги highway, иначе ломается дорожный граф, residental используется для жилых улиц
nitram1234 (2020-09-28 10:56:33+00:00): Hi thanks for mapping! For the next time, could you please try to only edit stuff in one area at a time? This helps others trying to review edits in a certain area. Thanks a bunch in advance. Cheers!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:29:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:59:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
mavl (2020-09-21 16:58:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: the personal data.
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-21 18:55:21+00:00): Hi M Waeil, welcome to OSM.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

Furthermore, could you revert your map edits?

More information about your changeset:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=91202187

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ianlopez1115 (2020-09-28 14:34:29+00:00): Edits in this changeset have been fixed/modified, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91648691 for details
maxerickson (2020-10-22 00:07:33+00:00): Just a heads up, this edit broke the boundary relation for Battle Creek.
mshahaba (2020-10-23 09:56:39+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect edit. Will ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
mshahaba.
osmviborg (2020-09-21 07:31:27+00:00): Hej. Jeg har ændret din tagging af den kommende kanal. Din metode fik det til at se ud som om kanalen allerede er etableret.
njrasser (2020-09-21 11:41:42+00:00): Hej Viborg, Jeg takker :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:29:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
Tomas Straupis (2020-09-22 06:07:15+00:00): Jei pastatas neturi numerio, reiškia jis neturi adreso. Reiškia nereikia ir addr:city/addr:street žymų.
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-21 18:56:28+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91216196
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-21 18:57:05+00:00): Hi AlexVamp, welcome to OSM.

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-21 06:56:08+00:00): Hi, highway=service is necessary on parking aisles as highway=* specifies that they are a road, without it it's just a line that is not routable.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-21 09:13:04+00:00): I've added highway=service back in 91215878
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:30:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
BER319 (2020-10-05 06:21:38+00:00): Hallo akania,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ein paar Anmerkungen zu deinen Arbeiten.
Das Einzeichnen von separaten Fußwegen ist in OSM sehr umstritten., eigentlich werden diese als Attribut an die Fahrbahn gelegt.
Bitte schaue dir dazu das Forum an. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
Wenn du diese aber separat maps, müssen auch wirklich alle möglichen Verbindungen zur Fahrbahn mit eingetragen werden. Sonst funktioniert das Routing nicht. Hier ein Beispiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=52.26721%2C14.06532%3B52.26632%2C14.06626#map=18/52.26736/14.06744 
Für Brandenburg gibt es aktuelle Luftbilder, diese sollten auch im ID hinterlegt sein.
Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98026776 schneidet dein Fußweg mehrfach die Gebäude, das ist sehr unsauber eingetragen. 
Ansonsten bei Fragen ist das Wiki immer die 1. Anlaufstelle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite?uselang=de
Viel Grüße
BER319
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-21 18:57:32+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91216196
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-21 18:57:58+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91216196
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:30:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-10 14:29:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92277028 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon Go-vandalism (deleting stuff, removing tags) in Brazil.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3982, 3981, 3980.
skfd (2020-09-21 23:03:16+00:00): Привет! Ты тут превратил лесь в farmland. Я вернул назад бо по спутнику лес на месте )
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91205363
blackboxlogic (2020-10-02 18:46:26+00:00): regarding "aerodrome:type=public"
Loring isn't a public airport (last I checked). It is more of a retired military base.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91205557