piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2019-03-23 08:07:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the tags of the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489145962. I assume, that you wanna an address information for the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678620874#map=17/38.83415/-77.55878 ? Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
viloan (2019-03-22 11:25:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
philippec (2023-01-18 18:35:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7046532993#map=20/50.84511/4.35793
Brussel Ravenstein, Die AED staat waarschijnlijk verkeerd.
Leo Slager (2019-03-22 20:44:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-03-22 20:48:07+00:00): Dag geminitijn,
Gebouwen worden in NL rechtstreeks geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster.
Samen met een adresnode.
Als er nadere bijzonderheden zijn dan kunnen die wporden toegevoegd aan de adresnode. Op het gebouw alleen die zaken taggen die bij het gebouw horen.
ik maak wat correcties.
Leo Slager (2019-03-22 20:36:14+00:00): Dit is helaas onvolledig.
de juiste combinatie is zoals je de eerste ook gedaan hebt:
Dat kun je ook opzoeken in de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial
Leo Slager (2019-03-22 20:43:27+00:00): De website kan apart vermeld worden:
website=
ik maak wat correcties
Leo Slager (2019-03-22 20:11:49+00:00): Hier is de parking dwars door een gebouw heen getekend. Was dat ook de bedoeling ?
Corrigeer je dat zelf ?
Leo Slager (2019-03-25 18:21:37+00:00): Correcties aangebracht iom pdok 25cm, BAG terugmelding gedaan.
Er wordt niets gecorrigeerd in de BAG.
Lostmonkey (2019-04-13 18:04:49+00:00): Luftfoto er forældet! Dette flydende badebro-modul er efter dets færdiggørelsen blevet roteret og forankret længere henne af molen (som jeg oprindeligt havde tegnet). Har rettet tilbage.
Hjart (2019-04-13 20:03:27+00:00): Bemærk at dette changeset er lavet i en russisksproget browser. Hvis du angiver en kilde (source=*), https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date eller linker til et billede https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons / Mapillary vil os der følger aktiviten i DK lettere kunne fange ting som dette.
sovereign_ch (2019-03-22 12:09:00+00:00): Falscher Änderungskommentar, korrekt wäre: zwei Weichen gekennzeichnet.
Wulf4096 (2020-06-15 08:10:20+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du denn hier die Gleisquerung https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255239345/history rausgenommen?
ma-rt-in (2020-06-16 14:34:21+00:00): Hallo,
ich Querung habe ich ein paar Meter weiter nach oben geschoben, da die untere eher ein railway=crossing ist und kein level_crossing.
vg
Wulf4096 (2020-06-16 15:05:34+00:00): Ok, ich hab das dann mal als railway=crossing wiederhergestellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86728311
!i! (2019-03-22 19:31:30+00:00): Hi, woher hast du denn die Information?
Grob ist das zwar im 1953er Luftbild nachzuvollziehen, aber das dürfen wir ja nicht wirklich nutzen :( https://www.geoport-hro.de
archie (2019-04-06 09:30:02+00:00): Det finns extra addr:-tags för adressuppgifter. name-tagggen är inte till för adressen! Läs hjälpsidorna först.
user_5359 (2019-03-28 14:08:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! This closed area isn't a priamry highway, it is a building! And don't overpaint existing objects. I have delete your way.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-04 21:51:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68900424 where the changeset comment is: Following discussions with the French community (and no reply to complaints), reverting some dubious edits in FRance. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2650 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-04 21:53:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68900506 where the changeset comment is: Following discussions with the French community (and no reply to complaints), reverting some dubious edits in FRance. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2650 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-04 21:53:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68900506 where the changeset comment is: Following discussions with the French community (and no reply to complaints), reverting some dubious edits in FRance. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2650 et al
user_5359 (2019-03-23 08:36:57+00:00): Hello! You use in same case the key highway= instead highway (please notice the additional equal sign). You can found the way with this query http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Hg1 . If you need help: You are welcome.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-04 21:53:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68900506 where the changeset comment is: Following discussions with the French community (and no reply to complaints), reverting some dubious edits in FRance. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2650 et al
Jorisbo (2019-03-22 14:56:59+00:00): Hi Anakil, i saw you updated as well highway = services in Ranst. I did add it yesterday or so through ID and wanted to modify the other side of the road as well, but that was already done by you :-). The ID editor automatically adds area = yes. I actually don't care but i'm just curious. Is it a coincidence that yo came along? Should area = yes not be added in your opinion? Kind regards Joris
Anakil (2019-03-22 15:09:36+00:00): Yes i did check all the highway=services in Belgium to look for bad tagging (some people used the highway=services for service road..., probably using the preset). And as the JOSM validator warn for "area=yes is not necessary" on this tag (and the osm wiki doesn't mention any need of area=yes for this tag either -> it is logical as it can only be a node or an area), i removed all of the "area=yes" on these objects in Belgium at the same time.

I suppose that ID editor didn't updated the presets (but it is not wrong, just unnecessary). 

Happy mapping, ;-)
Anakil 
Member of OpenStreetMap Belgium
Jorisbo (2019-03-22 15:28:00+00:00): thx for the update ! kind regards Joris
Jorisbo (2019-03-22 15:52:19+00:00): Hi Anakil, question of complete other dimension... Is there a easy way so see which questions are posted , like the way i do right now, adressing you?  I can only find them by opening the explicit changeset. You answered right away on my post, so you must have had some pop-up. Can I see somewhere which mappers maybe posted messages for me or can i see what i posted but maybe never got a reaction on? Kind Regards Joris
Anakil (2019-03-22 16:01:06+00:00): I just got an email notification. ;-) but else if you have other question/want to chat with the community feel free to join the chat riot or irc (the link is on the belgian contact page : https://openstreetmap.be/en/contact.html ).
Hjart (2019-03-22 13:26:28+00:00): Hi, could you please avoid messing with https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2689634 ?
wojtas82 (2019-03-22 15:01:14+00:00): What do you mean messing up? I'm cleaning up Eurovelo 10 and 13 from official sources. Everything is in correct order now in Poland. Please be more precise.
Hjart (2019-03-22 15:47:56+00:00): You removed all members of the superroute. I restored them.
wojtas82 (2019-03-22 16:02:53+00:00): I never deleted them. Weird.
Hjart (2019-03-22 17:56:58+00:00): Why is there now 4 "part Poland" relations?
Hjart (2019-03-22 18:11:10+00:00): Check out https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2689634/history 
Version #93 (a result of this changeset) has no members.
wojtas82 (2019-03-22 19:07:02+00:00): Ok, I will be more careful. Relations are hard to edit. 
I've split the main EV10 route onto voivodships as it is made in Germany. So here we have 3 parts (EV10 goes through 3 voivodships in Poland)
There are also proposed and developed  parts which are also added to the superroute EV10.
wojtas82 (2019-03-22 19:11:54+00:00): Oh, and also, there is thing in Poland. We have 2 types of signposts. R10 and EuroVelo 10. Some old parts are marked R10 (The long main parts) and the new developed parts are marked EV10 (for example here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9422510#map=15/54.4501/18.5660).
I will do some more minor changes soon. I'm also thinking what to do with EV13 which will have exactly the same route in Poland as EV10. I would like to combine it in one relation rather than have 2 separate relations which can cause many errors for new users.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-04 21:53:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68900506 where the changeset comment is: Following discussions with the French community (and no reply to complaints), reverting some dubious edits in FRance. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2650 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-04 21:51:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68900424 where the changeset comment is: Following discussions with the French community (and no reply to complaints), reverting some dubious edits in FRance. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2650 et al
marc__marc (2021-03-31 18:47:09+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6354480732
c'est le nom d'un batiment si oui lequel ? ou le nom du quartier ? en tout cas à l'endroit du point il ne me semble pas manquer de batiment
Cordialement,
Marc
shaikh solaiman (2019-04-04 14:36:55+00:00): Hi, Thanks for mapping. I am reviewing your task but there are a lot of missing buildings appears before me. However I am adding those buildings. So, try to add all missing buildings of your task for the better change. Thanks a lot and keep mapping.
Rizki IRM-ED (2023-01-26 08:40:59+00:00): Hi TuanIfan. Hope you well. Trusting you as well, as local mapper in Vietnam. Thank you for contributing in OSM. 
I do armchair mapping trying to fix and figure out railway layer tag issue in Maproulette.
Based on history I need your help https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/678649658 
I found the route about railway carry on coal “Tuyến đường sắt chở than Dương Huy - Cẩm Thạch”

I wonder, is this narrow railway or just some conveyor to carry out the coal. 
The other hand, this railway have an issue with layer tag. Is it should be add layer = 2, perhaps? Because there is some crossing with other conveyor in this area.
After i come across this area, i didn't found any street level imagery in Mappilary or Kartaview to help me. So. is there is there any additional information. Please let know.

Would you mind to come across reach this location? Its helpful for me
21.0006782, 107.2176884 
21.0066552, 107.2385842

Thank you
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-04 21:53:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68900506 where the changeset comment is: Following discussions with the French community (and no reply to complaints), reverting some dubious edits in FRance. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2650 et al
freebeer (2020-02-14 20:33:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81025145 where the changeset comment is: alpine huts are not found in cuba and personal info should not be published to osm
Leo Slager (2019-03-22 22:53:10+00:00): Geldt dat ook voor de tegengestelde richting ?
Ik neem aan van wel, dus heb ik dat toegevoegd.
viloan (2019-03-22 14:21:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DD1GJ (2019-03-22 20:31:37+00:00): Hallo sebarrios, es besteht kein Vertrauen in die Korrektheit der unzähligen von Dir angelegten Parks. Daher wurden alle Deine Eintragungen von einem anderen Mapper und mir inzwischen entfernt.

https://pokemon-go-forum.de/threads/pokemon-go-spieler-zerstoeren-open-streetmaps.3160/
viloan (2019-03-22 14:27:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
KM1980 (2019-03-22 15:24:22+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur der Cyclelanes. Nutze/Ändere nur selten in OSM; bin nicht mit den Feinheiten vertraut.
Trotzdem habe ich in einer weiteren Änderung die Bezeichnung B57 für die beiden Straßen(abschnitte) rausgenommen. Quelle: Survey; Dort ist einfach keine Bundesstraße
Grüße, Ulrich
aixbrick (2019-03-22 15:54:55+00:00): Wenn du dich vor Ort überzeugt hast, dann ist das in Ordnung. Nur Daten von anderen (urheberrechtsgeschützten) Werken zu übernehmen ist nicht erlaubt. Außer es gibt eine explizite Erlaubnis.
4004 (2019-04-14 23:10:53+00:00): здравствуйте,
а откуда данные? особенно про кладбище интересно узнать
Антон-1983 (2019-04-25 13:50:39+00:00): На многих картах кладбище нанесено. Например здесь:
https://orda.of.by/.map/?53.652174,23.906248&m=bing/16,ev/13
Месторасположение уточнено и проверено.
4004 (2019-04-25 16:14:50+00:00): а, ну так и предполагал. а вы сами там были? а то я у кого не спрошу, не знают про кладбище, может не осталось там ничего?
Антон-1983 (2019-04-25 17:19:28+00:00): Нет - я не был. Что-то там ещё осталось. Кладбище стоит на балансе сельсовета
4004 (2019-04-25 19:34:51+00:00): то есть, вы отметили кладбище полагаясь на генштаб/документы сельсовета? генштаб не подходит по лицензии, там неясные условия использования
Антон-1983 (2019-04-25 20:04:00+00:00): У меня много источников. В том числе ноги и глаза. Так что не парьтесь. Всё верно.
4004 (2019-04-25 20:49:59+00:00): это радует, спасибо за разьяснение
frosm (2019-03-27 00:56:44+00:00): par ailleurs ici, tu as supprimé toutes les infos comme quoi il a avait un bâtiment pour les transformer en "pour les touristes, il y a un chalet"
c'est bien d'avoir ajouté l'info touristique mais pour osm c'était quand même aussi un bâtiment
mueschel (2019-03-24 12:24:34+00:00): Hi,
you added the new tag "incl" to many roads. Could you explain what it means?

Please note that only tags should be used, that are defined and documented in the OSM wiki.

Cheers
Jan
Mormegil (2019-06-27 12:36:37+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71671330
Bobropiton (2023-04-04 08:36:22+00:00): Приветствую. Подскажите, пожалуйста, цель расстановки по node станциям метрополитена неописанного в вики тэга transport=subway?
sirorezka (2023-04-05 13:26:07+00:00): Ну, вы нашли изменение ) Это было 4 года назад. Я уже не помню. Может быть тогда на похожих объектах я находил такие теги, поэтому решил сюда добавить.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
scai (2019-03-28 11:54:00+00:00): Hi RailAir,

bitte kein area:highway=* durch highway=* ersetzen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387868933). area:highway dient alleine dem Rendering, nie dem Routing. highway hingegen wird für das Routing verwendet. Deine Änderung führt einerseits dazu, dass auf diesen Wegen (dem äußeren Rand der Straßen) nun zusätzlich geroutet wird, andererseits führt es dazu dass das Rendering der Karten entsprechend merkwürdig aussieht. Ich korrigiere das mal für dich.

Grüße
Alex
JJIglesias (2019-03-22 17:19:21+00:00): Que es esto que creaste?
frosm (2019-05-31 20:23:15+00:00): Hello,
it is a great pleasure to see such complete information for the hotel in osm.
however there were 3 small mistakes.
the tag note=* is used to describe information between contributors. commercial bla-bla is not information for a contributor but for the end user. I moved it to description=*
the brand was informed as Hilton when it would seem that your exact brand is "Hilton Hotels & Resorts"
the url filled in contained the id of your navigation, I cleaned it
I let you correct the others:)
do not hesitate to add the location of the building entrance when you know it as I just did for this one, it facilitates pedestrian routing, quite useful on a site as large as the defense
Regards.
gendy54 (2019-03-22 17:05:24+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour ta contribution.
Il manque les tags les plus essentiels pour que ta contribution soit efficace. Soit amenity=hospital, soit amenity=social_facility et les sous tags pour la précision.
En l'état healthcare=SSR est inexploitable car elle ne fait pas parti des tags décidés par la communauté. Pour retrouver comment tager chaque objet, il faut rechercher sur le wiki, par exemple ici: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:%C3%89l%C3%A9ments_cartographiques

Pour les structures de santé:
http://finess.sante.gouv.fr/fininter/jsp/actionDetailEtablissement.do?noFiness=470010364
Bien que situé dans les limites de St Léon, il est domicilié à Caubeyres.

A ta disposition si besoin.
BCNorwich (2019-03-22 17:48:53+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Are you sure the park is located here? Using the Esri World Imagery in the iD editor that you added the park with, you will see the park is drawn over a house.

Could you please check and amend, if you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-04-01 07:56:15+00:00): No response so I've removed the park. I think it is further north but am not sure.
Gppes (2019-03-30 16:46:44+00:00): Hallo, jemand hat vor kurzem die Flugzeuge und das Gebaeude geloescht, weil diese auf existierende auf existierende Elemente "gestapelt" wurden, ohne diese mit anzupassen. Hast Du das noetige Wissen wie es dort jetzt aussieht, um diese Fehler auszubessern? Lg, Gppes
gendy54 (2019-03-22 16:40:04+00:00): Bonjour Gilbert,

Merci pour tes contributions.
Tu n'as pas besoin de rajouter addr:city et code postal. La maison étant déjà intégrée à des limites communales. Tu peux par contre ajouter le nom de la rue et éventuellement les numéros .
DavidKewley (2019-03-23 18:47:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I've reverted this because it changed object tags to clearly incorrect values.

Please respect the OSM community's work by only improving the map data, not degrading it. Thanks!
BeKri (2019-04-18 14:47:47+00:00): Servus Basstoelpel,
in der Gerhart-Hauptmann-Straße 45-51 ist jetzt aber irgendwie der Wurm drin ...
Suffix a und b sind jetzt immer doppelt drin, ...
Und ohne Suffix in der Mitte ... hmmm .
Weißt Du eine sinnvolle Lösung ?
Gruss derBeKri
Basstoelpel (2019-05-27 11:41:20+00:00): Hinfahren und vor Ort überprüfen...

Im Ernst: ich vermute, die Hausnummern sind und waren auch vorher schon falsch, es ist nur bisher nicht aufgefallen, weil kein QS-Tool Adressen mit aS-Relationen ausgewertet hat.
gscholz (2019-03-27 05:32:38+00:00): Hi,
this changeset has created an error in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-74.08121&lat=2.72283&zoom=10&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Guido
Raffaele_P (2019-03-27 08:08:48+00:00): Hi,
I fixed all the duplicate nodes I found in the whole area, as well as all the intersection issues I was allowed to open. Other intersection issues give me an error message (HTTP 500) when I try to open the iD Editor.
gscholz (2019-03-28 05:44:21+00:00): Hi Raffaele,
thanks a lot! May be you would like to inspect the aerea you are editting on a regular base with quality improvement tools, there are several:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance

This would help to improve the map.
Guido
gscholz (2019-03-27 05:34:11+00:00): Hi,
this changeset has created an error in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-74.08121&lat=2.72283&zoom=10&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Guido
Balaabirami (2019-03-27 07:09:31+00:00): Hi,
I am new to OSM mapping. Exactly what do you want me to do with the changeset? 

Bala.
gscholz (2019-03-28 05:56:20+00:00): Hi Bala,
please make yourself familiar with the OSM-Inspector, which is a quality improvement tools. There are others as well:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance

Just briefly, every colored mark you see highlighted on the map is a osm error. You can just clkick on one of them and in the upper right section of this window will appear a list how to edit the defective osm item. Further click on the icon of your prefered osm editor in this selection and it will open right away the selected item. Then you can fix the error. 

In your case you have created ways which intersect with themselves, which is not allowed. Map renderers can not display such ways on the map.

Guido
Truchin (2019-04-02 20:28:17+00:00): Idem sur la station Madeleine, je pense qu'il faut adapter les tags des quais des différentes lignes.
Pas besoin de préciser la ville, l'arrondissement & cie puisque cela se déduit de la position géographique de l'élément.
Et les stations me semblent étonnamment larges : 20 mètres pour une des lignes. N'est ce pas trop ?
Bonne continuation

Thomas
BrackoNe (2019-06-08 11:04:15+00:00): Hi Tatchy,

Your edit is wrong @44.761295, 20.4823588

Please fix it because your edits shows it is only possible only to make right turn from West to East, instead of right AND streight on. Very wrong. This is Secondary road which connects two parts of the city and you are forcing here to make right turn to the parking.

https://prnt.sc/nz7753

Thanks,
Nemanja
Microsoft