piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Carto'Cité (2019-11-07 16:49:54+00:00): Bonjour.

Merci pour l'ajout des pistes cyclables sur l'Avenue John Fitzgerald Kennedy, mais en fait celles-ci sont déjà matérialisées sur le way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655416810 par le tag cycleway=lane. Cet ajout crée donc un doublon.

À y regarder de prêt (photos Mapillary) il semble qu'il y a bien une bordure sur le tronçon en question : j'y ai remplacé le tag cycleway=lane par cycleway=track, qui me semble bien adapté ici. J'ai bien ajouté la discontinuité au niveau du passage piéton : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/742987154 

Bonne continuation !
Antoine de Carto’Cité ,projet #CartoVeloIDF
naomap (2019-11-07 14:02:42+00:00): Bonjour George.

Je suis étonné de la suppression de tags tels maxspeed, lit, cycleway, sidewalk, motor_vehicle=private sur un élément comme https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4411085, surtout quand la source est armchair mapping ;)
Ce serait pas un peu de zèle Osmose/JOSM ?

Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
GeorgeKaplan (2019-11-09 16:46:53+00:00): Bonjour Antoine,

Il n'y a pas de zèle Osmose/JOSM, qu'est-ce qui t'étonne ici ?

J'ai découpé l'avenue Sisley pour laisser libres les accès du domaine public jusqu'aux grilles de chaque côté de cette voie privée. On voit bien sur l'imagerie les 5 m de passage sur le trottoir.
J'ai donc adapté cette portion de voie avec les bons tags.
Carto'Cité (2019-11-12 07:55:07+00:00): Ok mais du coup l'autre section (https://www.osm.org/way/740844795) se retrouve avec la vitesse par défaut de residential, soit 50 km/h. 
Antoine.
GeorgeKaplan (2019-11-12 20:31:35+00:00): Je ne sais pas si une voie privée fait partie d'une zone 30, il faudrait demander à la mairie.

D'ailleurs, je suis allé voir sur place ce WE, il n'y a rien qui indique que c'est une aire piétonne. En revanche, il y a un B0 sur la grille, Je devrais donc changer le type de voie pour un footway ou un pedestrian avec bicycle=no. Mais ça me parait être (encore) une erreur de l'aménageur.
Carto'Cité (2019-11-13 09:15:36+00:00): Ok merci George.
Si la voie est empruntée par des cyclistes malgré le B0, je propose de mettre un bicycle=permissive plutôt que bicycle=no...
Antoine.
eggie (2019-11-01 07:27:13+00:00): Dag Ramon, 
review
Zelf vind ik het een heel gepuzzel. Je "moet" eens hier kijken voor de uitleg.. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:turn#Voorsorteerstroken_per_rijvak
MVG,
Eggie
Chris Fleming (2019-11-04 12:39:15+00:00): Thanks for adding yourselves. If you can,m the it would also be useful to add your address, as well as opening hour. 

Let me know if you have any questions, and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
NKA (2019-11-04 06:46:15+00:00): Skulle ikke Strandsagvegen bygges om? (Flyfotoet er gammelt)

https://www.ostlendingen.no/ringsaker-blad/ringsaker-blad/vil-flytte-fra-husene-sine-pa-grunn-av-ny-e6-avkjoring/s/2-2.2757-1.8358796
han6man (2019-11-04 17:35:37+00:00): Vi bør ikke tegne veier som ikke finnes selv om de kanskje vil finnes i fremtiden. Jeg kjørte der med GPS og har mappet noenlunde korrekt iht. tracklogg i dag.
NKA (2019-11-04 17:45:03+00:00): Vi tegner veier som er under bygging med construction-taggen. Spørsmålet var om veien er bygget ennå eller ikke, men det har du tydeligvis sjekket. Det er mye arbeid å legge inn slike planlagte veier, så uheldig om de bare blir slettet.
trigpoint (2019-11-01 15:01:15+00:00): Spam removed, I doubt your business is in the middle of the road. It needs to be verifiable and location does not match address on website.
Supaplex (2020-01-02 17:50:07+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2019-11-01 06:27:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please note that we only note real things and not game items like Pokemon Parks. Please be sure to do so.
mueschel (2019-11-03 12:22:06+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of your "route_segment" tags? They are not used in any other place and seem to overlap with existing roads.

Thanks!
ralley (2019-10-31 23:57:52+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  Rather than highway=streetlamp I believe the lighting towers are more properly tagged as man_made=tower (or man_made=mast) and tower:type=lighting.  Also please don't tag descriptions like "light tower" as the name.
ralley (2019-11-02 10:04:40+00:00): Fixed
user_5359 (2019-11-01 06:15:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the address of a house isn't the name of the house. Please have a look on the newest version of your node.
Leo Slager (2019-11-01 00:49:24+00:00): volkomen overbodige turnrestrictie.
Leo Slager (2019-11-01 00:51:13+00:00): Daar moet je dan een fietspad van maken.
Leo Slager (2019-11-01 00:41:24+00:00): Dat is volkomen overbodig.
Er zal nooit een route tegen het eenrichtingsverkeer tot stand komen.
De restrictie is dus volkomen overbodig.
Stel voor dat je die weer verwijderd.
Leo Slager (2019-11-01 00:47:03+00:00): Zo behoort dat niet getagd te worden.
verkeersbord G11, dan toevoegen mofa=designated
moped=no

verkeersbord G12a, dan toevoegen
mofa=designated
moped=designated

verkeersbord G13, dan toevoegen
mofa=no
moped=no

Je kunt dat ook opzoeken in de wiki
Leo Slager (2019-11-01 00:43:24+00:00): Als het fietspad correct is getagd hoef je dat helemaal niet aan te geven.
Leo Slager (2019-11-01 00:52:23+00:00): Dat is nu een correcte restriction
viloan (2019-11-01 00:27:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jakka (2019-11-01 08:04:33+00:00): Vermoed dat je een tweede path/footway naast de reeds ingetekende hebt toegevoegd ? Graag een antwoordje. Zie dez die er al stond: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462795372#map=17/51.07983/3.43870&layers=N
sammaertens (2019-11-01 10:40:55+00:00): Er zijn effectief 2 paden, 1 Finse piste voor lopers binnen het domein en een tweede pad dat eigenlijk buiten het domein ligt en ook connectie maakt met de Lindestraat.
Jakka (2019-11-01 10:43:45+00:00): Thx voor snel antwoord, zijn deze gescheiden door een afspanning of zo ? kan men van de een naar de andere lopen/gaan ? Nu is er negens een connectie...
sammaertens (2019-11-01 10:58:33+00:00): Het grootste deel is inderdaad gescheiden door een afspanning, je kan wel hier en daar makkelijk van het ene naar het andere pad gaan, maar daar weet ik de precieze locatie niet van.
Jakka (2019-11-01 11:01:28+00:00): OK voor de update.
user_5359 (2019-11-01 05:59:17+00:00): Hello! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Don't use landuse.
mappas (2019-11-01 01:43:19+00:00): Resolving:
https://www.osm.org/note/1970152
https://www.osm.org/note/1970148
https://www.osm.org/note/1970150
user_5359 (2019-11-01 05:57:53+00:00): Hello! For a better description of your objects please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours. Please notice also: We use the 24h notation for time informations.
Tyrese Wormely (2019-11-01 12:37:17+00:00): Sorry! I'm always used to the 12 hr. notation. Didn't know that.
rivermont (2020-05-27 04:14:11+00:00): If these are reviewed, why is a driveway tagged as tertiary? (w740869665)
jmapb (2019-11-04 18:59:24+00:00): Hi rbest, welcome to OSM!

There were a couple of problems with this changeset, so I've reverted the changes with changeset 76609305. 

Specifically, all of the cycle paths you mapped are already on the map. Note that not every cycle path has to be mapped as a highway=cycleway. Very often they're indicated with other tags (such as bicycle=designated) added to another kind of highway=* way.

Also, you connected one cycleway directly to the underground tracks of the F train -- careful about connecting ways on different levels.

Please let me know if you have any question, happy to help!

jmapb
TheBestIdea (2019-11-05 01:55:03+00:00): Thanks for catching jmapd!

And rbest, if you check out the cycle layer of the OSM homepage, you can see at lot of these lanes that are mapped as an attribute of other ways. Unprotected bike lanes (cycleway=lane) are shown as solid blue lines on the edge of streets and protected bike lanes (cycleway=track) are shown as dashed blue lines: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/40.68567/-73.98657&layers=C
SomeoneElse (2019-11-01 22:47:48+00:00): Hello,

Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.

Just checking that the construction on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/740586179 is complete and it is a motorway?  We at the DWG had a complaint about the user who changed it to a motorway (before your edits), so I'm just checking with other users that the current mapping is OK.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
user_5359 (2019-11-01 05:39:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't use the key for description.
Kylie S (2019-12-10 17:56:47+00:00): Well this isn't something I'm expecting other people to see (I'm surprised you found it), and the wiki page on changesets implies they are suppose to be a description.
PerplexingPenguins (2019-12-11 01:48:08+00:00): I assume by "the key" you're referring to name?
user_5359 (2019-12-11 03:30:58+00:00): Oops, actually the affected key "name" is missing there. I apologize for this incomplete message
Kylie S (2019-12-11 23:06:40+00:00): I never said anything about a key. When I added this path OSM asked me for a changeset, so I added a description of the path. I don't know why it added my description along the path itself, or what key you are referring to, named or otherwise.
user_5359 (2019-12-12 04:40:13+00:00): After a month it is of course too late to investigate a possible cause now. But we use the word description twice. Once we are supposed to describe what we have changed and to second have the key description. The expected content is often written in the key name. Therefore, when verifying changes, we pay attention to it and also write a note there.

However, in your case there seems to have been a confusion between entering the change record description and entering it in the Name field. Unfortunately it might be too late to track this error, but I will pay attention to the next errors of this kind, whether same causes descriptions exist.

I hope you still have fun with OSM and can improve the map of your environment. If you have further questions or help, please feel free to contact me: You are welcome!
pyram (2019-11-04 19:46:19+00:00): Hello hezam091,

Please upload only real existing buildings.
Sorry, but I reverted (deleted) your obviously game data (or very bad giant building).

Best regards
pyram
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-01-14 09:43:54+00:00): تم عكس هذه التغييرات لوجود حذف لقرى صحيحة:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116140484
Spiekerooger (2024-06-11 21:24:59+00:00): Hello Supaplex, with this changeset you've added a lot of multilingual names to the Orlando city relation but quite a few of those had the value of "Florida" (and only Florida) in those languages but not "Orlando". This was probably a mistake in your large changeset. I hope that my deletions of those wrong name:xx tags (Florida instead of Orlando or Orlando, Florida) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152561390 are ok with you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-24 08:14:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245883124/history has shop = power_equipment that was added in this edit
shop=power_equipment ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is shop=power_equipment used intentionally instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=power_tools ? If yes, what is the difference?
AdamTheWebMan (2026-06-13 15:46:01+00:00): I will change the tag to a newer more descriptive one shop=garden_machinery.
Supaplex (2020-01-02 17:50:41+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mjans (2019-11-10 13:34:24+00:00): Vandaag nog gepasseerd en enkel de eerste 10-20 meter van de Houthoek (komende van de Nieuwe Baan) is éénrichtingsverkeer. Er staan wel verbodsborden in de andere richting (bv. aan het kruispunt met de Hospestraat) maar daar hangt een bordje onder "op 400m"
dentonny (2019-11-11 07:19:36+00:00): Excuseer, dat bordje eronder moet ik gemist hebben
ndm (2019-11-01 22:47:32+00:00): I've moved the access restriction onto the highway -- please do that in future if your mapping around Bristol, UK -- it makes it more obvious for local mappers.

Note: Amazon mappers typically use private rather than destination.
Frans S (2019-11-01 13:56:17+00:00): Hello Rhea. Thanks for mapping here
I notice a few objects which you mapped as buildings. Obvious when there is no shadow to see, it is mostly no building
Best regards
mueschel (2019-11-02 14:48:16+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the tag "уурхая явах цагууд"? Are these the times buses leave?

Jan
Glassman (2019-11-01 23:58:22+00:00): I think we are going to have to name you a honorary US Mapper. Thanks for all of your contributions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76478013
pangoSE (2019-11-06 13:40:15+00:00): Hej. Känner du till att man kan se gatufoton från Mapillary direkt i iD? Aktivera det under kartdata.
På detta foto ser du att det också är en gångväg. Dessutom är vägbanorna åtskild vilket saknas på vår karta.
Jag kommer fixa båda nu.
pangoSE (2019-11-06 14:02:13+00:00): se https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76705009 (titta i achavi för att se precist vad jag ändrad https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=76705009)
pangoSE (2019-11-06 13:26:30+00:00): Hej, det ser bra ut.
Kul att du är med och förbättrar i stan. :)
Frans S (2019-11-07 16:37:07+00:00): Hello Unen
Thank you for mapping on this project
A few remarks
Please use the Maxar Std Imagery as the primary source. More recent and actual than the BING imagery and prescribed in the instructions

Did you noticed the "issue triangle" on the right hand menu in iDeditor?  When a yellow or red dot pops up means that there are some issues. Mostly not squared buildings or connected nodes to other features. Please correct your own work before uploading it. 
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor. A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
See this picture (example) https://drive.google.com/open?id=1gjraDKIuYKQ9c7asnOlA4ioeZDty195U
Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/
Best regards and success with future mappings
user_5359 (2019-11-01 11:28:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please connect the parking aisles with the existing highways.
user_5359 (2019-11-01 11:34:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The line marking the size of a park area of a car are not parking aisle. for a better description of your objects please read https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
HubMiner (2019-11-07 04:08:31+00:00): Hola!  Please check opening_hours format with the link below, "700" is not a valid value.

https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?
parsd51 (2019-11-01 13:15:19+00:00): ﻿Hej

På Mapillary fra august i år er motorkørsel forbudt nordpå, med udtagelse af bus i rute og noget utydeligt med måske et tidsrum. Har du nyere lokalkendskab?

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.393021677421586&lng=10.38675209273947&z=19.699465150221886&focus=photo&tab=feed&dateFrom=2018-01-01&pKey=Ns96-GOuX-CIYu_BtJflCw&x=0.5694654216730335&y=0.4997006504673267&zoom=0.323525696841523
Jesper Blinoff (2019-11-03 18:19:33+00:00): Hej parsd51, min oprindelige rettelse beror på en fejlinformering. Jeg har rettet Klaregade så den igen fremstår ensrettet, som tidligere.
parsd51 (2019-11-03 21:10:09+00:00): Ok, tak for tilbagemeldingen.
rekasruj (2019-11-01 07:30:17+00:00): Hi,
I have added this road using "Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery ".
Regards,
Rekasruj
user_5359 (2019-11-01 11:38:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
PT-53 (2019-11-01 09:40:43+00:00): Hallo bergfrei,
ist dieser neue Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/740899876/history
wirklich nur an den Geh- und Radweg angeschlossen?
Grüße
bergfrei (2019-11-02 12:42:23+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
 ob dieser neue Weg auch an der Straße angeschlossen ist oder nicht, habe ich leider nicht notiert. 
Gruß
 bergfrei
PT-53 (2019-11-02 12:57:22+00:00): Also, ich sehe auf dem Maxar Premium-Luftbild diesen  Feldweg (noch) nicht, aber genau an dieser Stelle eine Verbindung zwischen Kreisstraße und Geh- und Radweg.
Grüße
ralley (2019-11-01 09:26:01+00:00): Why have you tagged a path visible on aerial imagery as a tunnel and dragged a turning circle from it's proper position?
ralley (2019-11-02 10:00:38+00:00): Reverted
marc__marc (2019-11-26 12:50:55+00:00): Hello Jakka,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6936583936
what's this ?
a reception desk ? a cabin inside a tourism=camp_site ? a reception desk inside a cabin ?
wouldn't it be better to split things into 2-3 objects? an area for tourism=camp_site (camp_site allows to define the quality of the camping) and an amenity=reception_desk object? building=cabin on the building it-selft.
moreover the controversial key camp_site defines if it is the main activity, secondary or place without activity
Regards,
Marc
Jakka (2019-11-26 13:25:07+00:00): There was only a node. So far I remember did only added the building. And added the website plus some error alerts in the landuse shape. Splitting in several units should be better No idea how large camping site is/the shape
marc__marc (2019-11-26 13:46:22+00:00): So this location is a reception desk of a tourism=camp_site ?

if the extent of the tourism=camp_site is not known, it is better to keep it as a node (but not the same node for tourism=camp_site and amenity=reception_desk)
Jakka (2019-11-26 13:52:20+00:00): done
user_5359 (2019-11-01 11:39:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Group 2B (2019-11-01 08:49:11+00:00): #HKU_DH2019 #HKU_DH2019_2B
budgawl (2020-03-04 05:46:08+00:00): паб?
DemoLogin (2019-12-04 14:20:19+00:00): Почему у вас общее название "Минимаркет", а на русском "Семишагофф"?
Steube (2020-10-01 11:32:44+00:00): Prima, dass Du vorhandene Wege einträgst. Leider fehlt jeweils die Eintragung der Benutzbarkeit. Entweder Du trägst die access-Werte mit ein (hier privat) oder versiehst die Wege/ Straßen mit barrier-tags, da hier Tore sind, die nicht von Jedermann genutzt werden können. Hier wird sonst von Routern fleißig durchgeroutet, da es sich scheinbar um eine Abkürzung (über ein Privatgrundstück) handelt.
lv_mapper (2020-10-01 13:04:58+00:00): Das ist natürlich vollkommen richtig. Das habe ich einfach übersehen. Ist nun korrigiert.
user_5359 (2019-11-01 11:41:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
aseerel4c26 (2019-11-01 16:37:20+00:00): Was soll die Änderung darstellen? Du hast den ganzen Wald verschoben ... und das mit einem Editor aufm Handy. Warum? Hast du GPS-Traces abgeglichen? 

Du hast den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263212152/history nun schon fünf mal editiert heute. Wieso so oft? Geht das nicht auf ein Mal?
aseerel4c26 (2019-12-06 20:19:32+00:00): Danke für deine zwischenzeitliche Mail. Ich habe es geschafft, mich der Sache endlich anzunehmen. In https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6308244959/history (beispielhaft - bei anderen Knoten auch) sieht man mehrere Bearbeitungen eines Knotens vom 29. Okt. bis 1. Nov. - alle diese Bearbeitungen haben jeweils die Geometrie des ganzen Waldstücks verschoben. Wohl immer versehentlich bei Bearbeitungen die nicht das ganze Waldstück betreffen sollten.
Ich habe versucht es exakt zu reverten, unmöglich mit vertretbarem Zeitaufwand. Grund dafür sind die zig kleinen Folgebearbeitungen, die du an denselben Objekten gemacht hast. Ich könnte wahrscheinlich in dem Zeitraum alle deine Bearbeitungen revertieren, aber das ist wohl auch nicht sinnvoll.
Ich habe daher in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76484059 alle Knoten des Wegs 263212152 um 1,8 Meter auf exakt die alte Position zurückverschoben (anhand des oben verlinkten Beispielknotens). Geprüft habe ich das Ergebnis anhand circa 8 mehr oder weniger zufällig ausgewählten Knoten des Weg 263212152: alle waren nun wieder am alten Ort.

Bei den Stellen, wo du anscheinend absichtlich bearbeitet hast (cs76350001 bei n6927405685, cs76352992  bei n6927581917, cs76482964 bei w740914900, cs76484059 bei n6936762297) habe ich manuell angeschaut und für akzeptabel befunden - könnte ja sein, dass durch die Rückverschiebung da nun was nicht passt.

Zeitaufwand: circa eine Stunde. Daher nochmal die dringende Bitte Bearbeitungen, die örtlich und grob thematisch zusammenhängend sind auch in einem Rutsch abzuspeichern (ein Änderungssatz).