piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dome2808 (2017-09-03 22:12:12+00:00): Hi.  
Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Doch da ist jetzt ein Abschleppunternehmen

APS Biechele & Stell

Das Gebäude fehlt auf der Karte ist aber vorhanden mit der Hausnummer 2a


https://www.google.ch/maps/place/Biechele+%26+Stell-u.APS+S%C3%BCdbaden+GmbH+-+ASSISTANCE+PARTNER/@47.642192,7.637824,178m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x4791ba90a80829e3:0x437ca87ee84b7916!8m2!3d47.642333!4d7.638362
dome2808 (2017-09-03 22:13:11+00:00): Grüsse zurück
R0bst3r (2017-09-04 06:44:02+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51708573
Hab die Infos von deren Homepage angefügt. Google ist keine erlaubte Quelle.
gileri (2017-09-03 20:56:47+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM !

Ce noeud ne semble pas indispensable :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077738660

Pour le chemin :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521089156
Il est possible de retirer les tags access=no, foot=yes, qui sont impliqués par le tag highway=footway.

Dernièrement, le tag surface=ground est très vague et n'apporte pas d'informations ici à mon avis. Il faudrait mettre un tag surface=* plus précis ou le retirer.
trigpoint (2017-12-22 21:07:56+00:00): Hi
What is the source of this information?
I am wondering why you have ended this relation at Shrewsbury as it operates at least to Crewe.
Cheers Phil
mapper999 (2017-12-23 15:17:27+00:00): Hi Phil,
I used this line occasionaly, but I was not aware that some of the trains operate further than Shrewsbury. Feel free to add the part between Shrewsbury and Crewe to the relation.
dome2808 (2017-09-03 20:51:25+00:00): Beschreibung falsch eingegeben. GRund der Änderung:  Aufgrund Baustelle ist die Äussere Baselstrasse bis Ende 2019 zur Einbahnstrasse umfunktioniert.  Daher herrscht solange ein Linksabbiegeverbot
gendy54 (2017-09-04 17:06:12+00:00): Merci de ta contribution.
Le tag pour les médecins est amenity=doctor et qui est préférable à clinic dans le cas présent.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Ddoctors
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dclinic
Hjart (2017-09-03 21:30:26+00:00): Det ville være rart hvis du kunne skære ned på antallet af changesets du laver, da det f.eks. ville gøre https://osm.expandable.dk mere overskuelig
Thomas8122 (2017-09-05 17:31:31+00:00): Deine Knielohstr. 11 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5077875893 ist jetzt doppelt -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211511015 . Könnte es sich um eine andere Straße handeln? Gruß Thomas
ulmtuelp (2017-09-05 19:48:49+00:00): Stimmt das ist Quark. Hatte nur die zwei Hausnummern gesehen und der Kniehohlstr. zugeordnet. Sah auch +nach Hausnummer aus und nicht wie eine interne Zuordnung im Krankenhaus. Straße daher wieder gelöscht.
emvee (2023-10-03 18:00:14+00:00): Hoi,

In deze changeset heb je voetpaden met surface=paving_stones:30 toegevoegd en daar is nu een poll over, zie https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/paving-stones-30-en-gebruik/104143/38
hasienda (2024-06-15 15:57:20+00:00): Und es hat bis heute gedauert, ehe jemand die Fehler bemerkt hat. Also, ohne Ironie: Danke für den ersten Wurf, und ab jetzt ist es immerhin korrekt. :-)
ovruni (2019-01-14 01:37:05+00:00): Hola, he visto que agregaste número de casa sin nombre de calle en algunos nodos.
StephaneP (2017-09-04 07:42:50+00:00): C'est très bien, j'ai seulement ajouté le stop, et redessiné la connexion avec l'avenue Baptiste Dubois pour qu'elle soit à peu près à 90°.
 Si tu le souhaites, tu peux ajouter le nom de la rue si tu le connais, et ajouter les bâtiments avec la couche cadastre.
GerdP (2017-09-06 05:45:08+00:00): Hi!
You recently created two ways with highway=er
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521115694
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521661720
I assume you wanted to type re for residential?
frasty (2017-09-06 10:44:16+00:00): Hi, these ways were supposed to be  highway=service. Thank you for pointing me to the error!
Glassman (2017-09-04 05:35:50+00:00): Street names are tag with the full spelling in OSM to avoid confusion. I went ahead and fixed it.
Glassman (2017-09-04 05:46:29+00:00): I changed the gate from being tagged on the length of the street to a node on the street - from what appears to be a gate on imagery. Both for 58th Avenue South and South 322th Place. Please move the node if its in the wrong spot
samuelrussell (2017-09-04 03:37:20+00:00): Except they're not marked cycle lanes

http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/legis/nsw/consol_reg/rr2014104/s153.html

>4) A 
"bicycle lane" is a marked lane, or the part of a marked lane:
>(a) beginning at a bicycle lane sign applying to the lane, or a road marking comprising both a white bicycle symbol and the word lane painted in white

These lack the word "Lane" or the sign
aharvey (2017-09-04 05:22:17+00:00): There is a solid while painted line separating the traffic from the bike lane and a dotted white painted line separating the bike lane from the curb side parallel parking. These bike lanes have a painted white bike inside the lane which designates them as a bicycle lane. The bike lane can't be a shared_lane as it's not wide enough for vehicles.

I think we should go by the OSM wiki as it provides a globally consistent way of tagging rather than using local/jurisdiction specific legal definition. The wiki says "A bicycle lane...is an inherent part of the road itself" Check. "It has no physical separation from the other lanes except the painting on the road." Check. "Notably, there is no curb between the cycle lane and the road" Check.

The painted bicycle icon in the bike lane is enough, it doesn't need the word lane painted there too to be a bike lane.
aharvey (2017-09-04 05:30:04+00:00): If you'd like to be able to distinguish narrow cycle lanes from wide ones please use the cycleway:lane:width tag as described at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway#Supplementary_details
samuelrussell (2017-09-04 05:45:41+00:00): Can you add this to the wiki?  We can use cycleway:lane:bicycle=designated & bicycle:no for legal bicycle lanes, and cycleway:lane:bicycle=yes & bicycle=yes for marked cycle shoulders to represent the legal restrictions that vary between marked shoulders and by the law cycle lanes.
samuelrussell (2017-09-04 05:46:52+00:00): I wish I had the mapping time to go back and measure the widths :)  But I'll keep it in mind and find a "meter" rod somewhere on my body for future mapping.
aharvey (2017-09-04 06:16:06+00:00): Sorry I'm not sure what part you feel should be added to the wiki?

You're saying that this isn't a legal (in NSW) cycle lane because it lacks the word "LANE" painted in white next to the white bicycle symbol painted in the bicycle lane? Maybe you want something like bicycle:lane:legal=yes/no? I don't think it needs to meet the NSW legal definition as a cycle lane to be mapped as a cycle lane in OSM when it matches the OSM wiki guidance of what is a cycle lane.

Sorry I find cycleway:lane:bicycle confusing. The cycle infrastructure in question here is designated for bicycle since it has a bicycle symbol painted in the lane.
samuelrussell (2017-09-04 06:21:33+00:00): bicycle:yes means a legal reason to be able to ride
bicycle:designated means a specific legal designation

All lanes are packed:yes. Bus lanes are pav:designated. It matters because you can't legally climb Williams street to park in cbd in lanes 1-2 but are required to use the Australian road rules bicycle lane.
aharvey (2017-09-04 06:36:00+00:00): Hmm I always read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access as designated meaning it's set aside for that purpose. So a path with has a sign saying pedestrians and bicycles can use it would be foot=designated, bicycle=designated. access=yes I understood as you're allowed to use the way, but there is no signage to explicitly allow it, so a typical footpath would be foot=yes since people on foot a legally allowed to walk on it, but there is no sign setting it aside specifically for pedestrians.

So I think that matches most roads being psv=yes and bus lanes as psv=designated.

In the case of cycle paths/lanes, signs indicating they are for bicycles means bicycle=designated.
Sendavo (2017-09-04 03:40:10+00:00): Adding the name is good, I cannot know if it's correct or not. However this should still be a 'highway:track' or some other form of 'highway: ' as there is clearly some form of road/path
:)

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/281221789
SomeoneElse (2017-09-04 08:18:30+00:00): Hi,
Would it be possible to explain what the change was here?  "clean up special characters" doesn't really say what was changed and why.
Best Regards,
Andy
glglgl (2017-09-04 09:10:24+00:00): Besides, a change covering the whole world is kind of frowned upon. Better create separate changesets for each region.
Bman (2017-09-04 16:55:34+00:00): @SomeOneElse, the changes were to remove whitespace characters like newlines, carriage returns and tab.
Bman (2017-09-04 16:58:17+00:00): @glglgl, good point. Sorry about that.
rasagy (2017-09-11 10:24:19+00:00): Hey ThePenSil, welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding this data on OSM. Had a small question about the access tag you used: access=customers is used when you require a purchase/key/code to use the toilets. Do all these toilets fit this criteria? You can read more about the different access values here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets#How_to_tag
mueschel (2017-09-16 11:41:55+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way? Something went wrong with the ref tag.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521142317
"X622=S285"

Thanks, Jan
CENTRALHUB (2017-10-03 08:41:01+00:00): The secondary road (X622 you mentioned) should be the old S285. 

The new S285 (the primary road) is newly built, but is not fully completed on the map yet. 

Several online map in China tag both of them as S285.

Once we finish the primary road I believe that we can remove the ref tag from the secondary road.
mueschel (2017-10-03 09:52:38+00:00): Thanks for replying,
If I understand right, we can change the tag ""X622=S285" to "old_ref = S285", "ref = X622"?
CENTRALHUB (2017-10-03 16:46:04+00:00): I think we should only do "old_ref=S285", because we cannot confirm that it's X622.
user_4493657 (2017-09-04 17:27:12+00:00): Jesteś pewien, że można tam zjeść i zatankować? Patrz def. rest_area https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area def. services https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservices Mam nadzieję, ze nie sugerujesz się obrazkiem tylko czytasz treść w drugiej def.
user_4493657 (2017-09-04 17:35:01+00:00): Widzisz na obrazku masz Rasthof (highwey=rest_area) nie Raststätte (highewy=serwices). Obrazek jest nie prawidłowy. Polecam czytanie treści.
user_4493657 (2017-09-04 17:59:50+00:00): Poprawiłem. Przepraszam, że tak naskoczyłem, ale chciałem zwrócić uwagę w tym przypadku(kiedy def. jest jasna) na poprawne tagowanie. Pozdrawiam.
user_4493657 (2017-09-04 18:23:22+00:00): Poprawka. Obrazek jest ok. Widać na nim stację benzynową i punkty gdzie można zjeść, wypocząć i co najważniejsze zaparkować.
gendy54 (2017-09-04 16:54:01+00:00): Vergeet niet om de oorsprong van uw wijzigingen in te stellen met de broncode = *
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
gileri (2017-09-04 19:58:21+00:00): Hello and welcome on OSM !

You have requested a review for your changeset, so here it comes.

natural=water and water=pond seems well-suited according to the satellite imagery.

What I'm unsure of is whether the name is present on the ground or documents/plans for each of these ponds. Can you confirm that those are named Étang Chassin 1/2/3 ?

Last note, the first letter of the name should be 'É'
manoharuss (2017-09-04 05:44:58+00:00): Hi kailashdhirwani,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see that you have requested a review. Thanks for your interest in contributing to the open  map of the world. The copyshot POI is great but the building needs some work. It would be great if you can reshape it.

Otherwise, great!

Happy mapping,

Manohar
manoharuss (2017-09-04 05:45:49+00:00): http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/introduction/ is great to get started
manoharuss (2017-09-04 05:41:40+00:00): Hi Rajsamand Local Guide,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see that you requested a review. Your edits look great. One suggestion is to square off the polygons and buildings. For more information, use http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/ for understanding iD editor for OpenStreetMap. LearnOSM is also a great source for getting started on OpenStreetMap.

Happy mapping,

Manohar
PlaneMad (2017-09-04 06:38:23+00:00): These are some amazing contributions! Do look into https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway for how roads in India are classified.
manoharuss (2017-09-04 06:41:27+00:00): Observed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521146165/history looks like school grounds in the satellite imagery. Let me know if it is a new building that is missing from the imagery.

Thanks :)
mueschel (2017-09-16 19:00:36+00:00): Hi,
could you check the phone numbers here? Copy and paste didn't work correctly.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521147281

Jan
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-02 16:25:44+00:00): And `Ramacca=Margherito`, too. What is it for?
Aury88 (2017-10-04 05:45:24+00:00): WOW..I don't know what happened here. I  copy-pasted the tag from a node to a closed way with JOSM and this is the first time this results in a mess (not knowing this could happen I didn't check ) . thank you guys for reporting to my attention all this
Chris Fleming (2017-09-04 13:58:41+00:00): HI Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for the Edits. I see that you requested some feedback, and they look great to me. 

My only question/suggestion is if the Hinterland Shelter should be an amenity=shelter rather than a park? 
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/57.65646/-3.58689) Let me know if you have any questions. 

Cheers
Chris
labyrintista (2017-09-13 14:23:52+00:00): Hi Chris, 
Thanks for your feedback. At the time of making the edit I didn't realise I could just type in the feature field. So have changed it to amenity at your suggestion. 
Cheers
Ariane
Ambush (2017-09-04 18:28:34+00:00): Привет! 
Спасибо за дополнения.
Я проверяю ваш пакет правок и есть пара вопросов: на улице Гоголя отмечена только одна полоса для движения. Вероятно, ошибочно, думаю, две машины там вполне разъедутся (две полосы) и нужно ставить lanes=2
Ещё вопрос: от Советской улицы отходила безымянная улочка, вы её кусок удалили, это законно? :)
И последний: от Железнодорожной улицы к Гоголя вдоль ЖД была обозначена какая-то мелкая улица, вы её заменили на служебную дорогу для спецтехники (highway=track). Если вы просто хотели показать, что эта дорога плохая, разбитая, там нет асфальта -- можно использовать тег highway=unclassified + surface=ground(или dirt или sand итд) + smoothness=horrible (если её можно проехать разве что на 4х4).  Если же это служебная дорога для сельхозтехники, можно оставить track (и тоже уточнить его данными тегами + tracktype).
Вы можете ответить мне или самостоятельно внести исправления.
Всего доброго!
user_5359 (2017-09-04 13:20:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
rasagy (2017-09-11 11:51:44+00:00): Hi Amit,

You seemed to have correctly added Fire Hydrants earlier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51658688
Could you explain what this changeset is for? Don’t think this should be on OSM — you can’t add details with color names to make them show up that way on OSM.

Could you remove this, and instead use a tool like http://geojson.io/ to create custom data and then add it on a custom map?

Thanks!
user_2119612 (2017-09-12 13:23:14+00:00): Hi Rasagy,

Thanks for pointing that out. Could you please guide me as how can I remove this?

Thanks.
Alexander-II (2017-09-04 06:46:49+00:00): https://beta.openaerialmap.org/#/37.5521536549875,55.8655611454367,10/1201323232310/59ab0df046e19904aab0aadd Если кто заинтересован. Смещение 6.71; 7.31. Есть калибровочная геометрия в плагине смещений.
indigomc (2017-09-05 16:59:28+00:00): As per other changeset comments, please don't experiment with the map.Reverting.
eggie (2017-09-08 15:20:20+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
~Jhellico (2017-09-04 14:03:40+00:00): Цим набором (та рядом наступних) зламані відношення меж районів та сільрад. Плануєте виправляти?
eggie (2017-09-08 15:23:46+00:00): Probeer je commentaar aan te passen. Bv voetpad toegevoegd. local knowledge is de source (bron) die je aan je als tag kunt toevoegen.
Mapse verder. Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
BCNorwich (2017-11-02 16:32:48+00:00): Hello, regarding way (private) (521164524, v1). This was tagged with name=(private) IMHO incorrect so I've made it a note. 
If actually the track is private please tag it access=private, the name tag isn't for descriptions of the way.
rasagy (2017-09-11 11:33:54+00:00): Hi Pallavi,

Thanks for adding these shops to OSM. It seems that you added the same set of shops thrice — once with amenity=tea and then twice as shop=tea. Could you open the old changesets in JOSM and remove the incorrectly tagged/duplicate data?

Thanks!
rasagy (2017-09-11 11:37:23+00:00): Also, it seems you’re using using the incorrect order of long,lat values to add these details (hence they aren’t showing up near the IIT Mumbai campus as intended, but instead in the Arctic Sea). OSM doesn’t encourage automated imports of data — could you remove these changesets and add the data with correct coordinates as a new changeset?
GerdP (2017-09-05 07:07:06+00:00): Hi!
Please watch out for the typo
highway=unclassfied (wrong) instead of highway=unclassified (correct).
It seems your JOSM suggests the wrong spelling ;-)
I've corrected them now, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51738749
geoaria (2017-09-04 17:55:52+00:00): ??
geoaria (2017-09-04 17:52:24+00:00): شاهین نیا جان باز هم این لینک map.namaa.ثبت شد.
Thomas8122 (2017-09-04 14:40:51+00:00): hier das gleiche was ich gerade in deinem anderem Changeset kommentiert habe
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-09-13 16:23:00+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please avoid adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Bad edits were reverted.
Piskvor (2017-09-13 12:27:40+00:00): Dobrý den, nesouhlasím s tím, že to je krátkodobá změna - tato část bude omezena ještě řadu měsíců, přinejmenším do Vánoc 2017. To v době zmapování zcela odpovídalo konvenci zmiňované na OSM wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:construction

Vracet zpět to teď už nebudu, abychom se o to netahali tam a zpátky, ale než budete nějakou úpravu příště revertovat, zkuste nejprve autora změny kontaktovat právě takto, v diskusi u předmětného changesetu. Děkuji.
pehavel (2017-09-17 17:12:18+00:00): Dobrý den, děkuji za upozornění. Obecně s Vámi souhlasím. 
Bohužel, v praxi mi přijdou tyto dočasné změny spíše kontraproduktivní: Např. v mé navigaci se změna projeví přibližně po dvou měsících a to jen za situace, že průběžně hledám aktualizace. Také se stává, že někdo dočasnou změnu nevrátí zpět vůbec nebo při tom udělá chyby a navigace pak už vůbec cestu nenaplánuje (nebo velkým obloukem). Proto na tyto dočasné změny koukám s mírným odstupem. 
Děkuji za pochopení.
Piskvor (2017-09-17 17:23:19+00:00): Ok, děkuji za vysvětlení - na svou obhajobu uvádím, že jsem to takhle zmapoval při otevření dálnice, takže šlo o změnu z "tady není nic sjízdného" na "tady je to sjízdné jedním pruhem"; uzavírky ze stavu "normálně sjízdné" na "omezeně sjízdné" nemapuju. Obdobně jsem zmapoval 1+1 na prackovické estakádě na D8: stav "sjízdné 2+2 pruhy" tam nikdy neexistoval, a ač mělo jít o dočasné opatření, mapa tam stále odpovídá realitě. (Vzhledem k tomu, že hradeckou dálnici pamatuju od jejího počátku, kdy byla jen po Sadskou, jsem i k jejím dočasnostem skeptický)
Piskvor (2017-09-17 17:24:13+00:00): Zároveň bych Vás chtěl požádat, abyste opravil relace D11 a E67, které jste v místě své úpravy přerušil.
Thomas8122 (2017-09-04 14:38:56+00:00): Hallo,
jetzt hast du schon zum zweiten mal die Grenze verschoben, die ich nach WebAtlasSN eingezeichnet habe. Sei bitte in Zukunft etwas sorgsamer. Danke Thomas
Markus366 (2017-09-05 18:57:54+00:00): Hallo,
mir ist dieser tag 'pedagogical' neu bzw. in den diversen Nachschlageorten nicht auffindbar. Möchtest du das neu einführen? Falles es so ist, vielleicht macht es Sinn, vor der Nutzung neuer tags deren Einführung auf mailinglisten / Forum mal vorzustellen. Gerade boundary ist immer ein Reizthema (zu viele / zu unnötig/ nicht vor Ort nachprüfbar/ Quellenlage).

Wie sieht die Quellenlage für solche Grenzen aus? Gibt es auch für andere Orte/Bezirke neben Göttingen osm-konforme Quellen?

Gruß Markus
jengelh (2017-09-05 19:19:40+00:00): Es gibt nur das textbasierte Straßenverzeichnis, keine Shapefiles o.ä. Alle Polygone sind selber gezogen. Da eh nicht die Form entscheiden ist, sondern die Zugehörigkeit (Straße∈Poly) ist das auch ausreichend.

Übrigens gibt es bei OSM kein "unnötig" (Relevanzkriterium) - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2009-November/058053.html
Markus366 (2017-09-05 20:30:30+00:00): Hallo,

Ich will nicht sagen, dass Schulbehörde keinesfalls dazu gehören, allerdings sollte dann die Idee neuer boundary tags andiskutiert werden. Ich habe den changeset mal dort vorgestellt.

Schwierig finde ich außerdem, dass es unklar erscheint, ob wir für andere Regionen überhaupt Daten haben um solche Grenzen außerhalb dieses Einzelfalls zu bestimmen.

Markus
jengelh (2017-09-05 21:11:42+00:00): Solche Datensätze muss es sicher auch anderswo geben. Sonst wissen die Einwohner ja gar nicht, wohin sie ihre Kinder schicken sollen.
Einfach mal bei Google Schulbezirke+Stadtname rein. Da findet man stante pede z.B. http://www.halle.de/de/Verwaltung/Bildung/Schulen/Schularten/Grundschulen/
Nakaner (2017-09-05 22:16:59+00:00): Hallo jengelh,

ich bin gegen eine Erfassung von Schulbezirken in OSM und für eine Löschung schon erfasster, weil ich sehr bezweifle, dass diese vor Ort überprüfbar sind. Verwaltungsgrenzen gehören zu den ganz wenigen Ausnahmen bei denen wir das tolerieren und die Tendenz im Forum geht dahin, Schulbezirke nicht zu tolerieren. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59598

Darüber hinaus möchte ich hinweisen, dass eine Straßenliste als Datenbank verstanden werden kann. Wir als OSM-Projekt beanspruchen für mit OSM erstellte Straßenverzeichnisse die entsprechenden Schutzrechte, weshalb wir diese auch bei Dritten respektieren sollten.

Viele Grüße

Michael
jengelh (2017-09-05 22:45:53+00:00): Dann musst du auch gleichermaßen mit den PLZ-Bereichen/Straßenlisten der Deutschen Post vorgehen.
GerdP (2017-09-05 06:40:26+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've corrected a typo highway=residental instead of highway=residential on 16 ways,
please check when JOSMs auto-complete suggest it again;-)
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51737938
freebeer (2018-05-04 11:14:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58676082 where the changeset comment is: Clean maps.me private residences spam for GDPR and Notes spring-clean
highflyer74 (2018-08-27 07:31:51+00:00): Hi there! Just a quick tipp: I came across this CNG station recently and was wondering why it did not show the availability of CNG. Please be aware that =only is no option for fuel. This has to be tagged =yes if it is available (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel), otherwise it cannot be used.

I changed it to =yes.

See you!
Leonmvd (2018-08-27 14:06:51+00:00): Thanks for mentioning this !