piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dentonny (2022-08-07 06:29:19+00:00): Hey Thierry,

Ben je er zeker van dat deze hele weg enkelrichting is? Zou het kunnen dat het niet pas vanaf het laatste huis, nr6 is?

mvg
eggie (2022-07-11 10:14:15+00:00): Beste mrotman
Deze route heb ik opnieuw gesorteerd. Met editor iD kun je geen routerelaties bewerken. Het is een routekiller.

Gebruik svp editor JOSM

MVG
eggie
mrotman59 (2022-07-11 15:12:46+00:00): Hallo eggie,

Bedankt voor alle correcties.
Het is al jaren geleden dat ik de Knau Veilige looproute toegevoegd heb aan OSM.
Afgelopen week is de route voorzien van nieuwe routebordjes en is ook op een aantal punten gewijzigd. 
Wijzigingen ook aangebracht op OSM, maar dat dus niet helemaal goed gedaan.

Nogmaals dank voor de correcties.

Ik zal me eens verdiepen in de theorie en JOSM.

Groet,
Martin Rotman
eggie (2022-07-11 15:47:57+00:00): Op 1 klein stukje na zat de route er helemaal in.
Dus dat was wel gelukt.
Maar inderdaad josm als je nog iets.met routes wilt doen. Voor mij ook weer een leerzame sorteeroefening.
Groet
Eggie
richlv (2024-07-01 21:18:46+00:00): Te šur tur arī stāvvietu joslas utml. nelieli ceļi bij dabūjuši living_street - daļu nedaudz pielaboju atpakaļ uz "service".
Colbertson (2023-01-21 11:25:08+00:00): Individuāli koki jāiezīmē kā punkts ar natural=tree neviss kā landuse=wood
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest
rising-mistake (2022-07-11 10:12:12+00:00): Seems this was on me, when I surveyed last year there was a sign up, must have been for one of those events
legofahrrad (2022-07-14 11:09:10+00:00): Moin! Ist das richtig, dass hier jetzt zwei Friseure direkt nebeneinander gemappt sind?
Außerdem solltest du beachten, dass hier schon ein Node von einem alten Laden war, der ausgezogen ist. Der neue Friseur sollte dann den gleichen Node benutzen, um die Objekthistorie zu behalten.
Viele Grüße!
wiebketru (2022-07-14 11:17:14+00:00): Ja ist richtig, die Salons sind unabhängig voneinander.
Die Node-Sache sollte man natürlich angehen, der alte wurde mir leider in Osmand nicht angezeigt.
MxxCon (2022-07-11 15:45:08+00:00): w1077517352 and 1077517353 have "type=multipolygon". Is that a mistake or am I misunderstanding what's going on here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123446386
mbeyerle (2022-07-11 15:51:27+00:00): interesting, might have been an artifact of previous tagging but great callout. thanks and fixed - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123481547
Vladislav Konoplev (2022-07-13 16:12:15+00:00): Hello. May I know where you got this data from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123447364
Minh Nguyen (2022-07-13 19:20:49+00:00): I traced these geoglyphs from South Africa CD:NGI Aerial imagery, which is the default imagery layer in this area. (I think it’s supposed to be an advertisement for a roadhouse.)
Vladislav Konoplev (2022-07-15 07:35:32+00:00): Thanks for your reply.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123447364
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-24 13:33:04+00:00): Hello!

Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3955989 ?
ptarac (2022-09-04 08:57:51+00:00): W chwili (tj. 2022-07-10) dodawania przez Ciebie nr 1 przy Placu Józefa Piłsudskiego w Goleniowie ten numer był już na mapie! Dodałem go w zestawie #122332802 w dniu 13/06/2022r. 
Ciekawe ile takich sytuacji ma miejsce przy tak rozległym obszarowo zestawie zmian.... Może warto ograniczać się do obszaru jednej gminy na zestaw.
Dlaczego dzieją się takie rzeczy, że dublowane są numery adresowe? Importujecie bez weryfikacji?
maraf24 (2022-09-14 16:29:26+00:00): @Czadzik: Jak to jest z tą weryfikacją? Czyżby niedawno dodawane adresy są duplikowane?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9879752867
maraf24 (2022-09-14 16:38:34+00:00): Kolejne duplikaty. To nie wszystkie, zapewne jest ich jeszcze 2-3 razy tyle:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9879752676
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9879752647
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9879752865
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9879752860
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9879752541
ZeroJeden (2022-07-23 17:32:16+00:00): Co spowodowało oznaczenie dróg na Bródnie (okolice rohatyńskiej i turmonckiej) z dostępnością dla rowerów "designated"? Czy gdzieś przy tych drogach jest jakikolwiek znak upoważniający do takiego oznaczenia, czy to tylko subiektywne odczucia?
ZeroJeden (2022-07-24 12:11:32+00:00): Proszę się już nie fatygować odpowiedzią, natomiast polecam  przemyśleć czy powinien Pan/Pani uczestniczyć w tworzeniu OSM, jeśli wprowadza Pan/Pani swoje pobożne życzenia i ulubione trasy zamiast stanu faktycznego.
pozdrawiam.
W3NET0wns (2022-07-24 15:25:01+00:00): Ja znam odpowiedź na pytanie czy powinienem uczestniczyć w tworzeniu OSM, jednakże polecam zapoznać się szerzej z moimi zmianami a dopiero później dokonywać takiego niestosownego zapytunku
sorcrosc (2022-07-24 01:24:23+00:00): Can you explain military areas like this please? Here are beaches with resorts and people bathing.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14341561

Thanks
AlexZam (2022-07-24 14:27:57+00:00): I have no first person information on this area. But there is Russian maritime notification numbered 1641 for year 2022 saying that there's military practice zone here. Here's that document: https://structure.mil.ru/files/morf/military/files/NM_2215.pdf 
And this notification states maritime notofication of UK numbered 2263/21 as source. I could not find british notification anywhere though.
AlexZam (2022-07-24 20:25:35+00:00): Oh, I've found it! https://msi.admiralty.co.uk/NoticesToMariners/DownloadFile?fileName=22wknm21.pdf&batchId=9872ccea-0c5a-42fd-ba5f-1947b2beb08d&mimeType=application%2Fpdf&frequency=weekly
Page 2.17, item 2263.
It says to draw "limit of firing practice area, pecked line, joining <point list>"
AlexZam (2022-07-24 20:26:15+00:00): Also it says that source is Italian Notice 5.13/21
sorcrosc (2022-07-25 19:55:09+00:00): Thank you very much for the research. I'll take a look later.
Cheers
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-17 00:10:01+00:00): Me parece que este usuario está añadiendo puntos personales al mapa.
legofahrrad (2022-07-11 14:14:05+00:00): Hey ;)
Die Bilder von StreetComplete werden  ein paar Tage nach dem Schließen des Hinweises, zu dem sie gehören, gelöscht. Daher ist es eher unpraktisch, sie mit dem image-Tag an Objekte zu verbinden.
Viele Grüße!
sjakobi (2022-07-11 14:42:49+00:00): Oha. Danke für den Hinweis! :)
sjakobi (2022-07-11 14:43:22+00:00): Hab den Bild-Link gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123478784
mueschel (2022-07-11 16:48:29+00:00): Hi,
please don't readd 'opreator' tags. The spelling is wrong. I already corrected them once to the correct 'operator'.
kwiatek_123 (2022-07-11 18:06:31+00:00): Key:building:levels odnosi się do liczby kondygnacji. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:building:levels?uselang=pl

Jeśli to jest budynek parterowy to ma jedną kondygnację (powyżej gruntu)
Ubezpieczenia Daniel Lipowicz (2022-07-11 18:11:39+00:00): Tzn ja chciałem dodać tylko mój punkt ubezpieczeniowy :)
emergency99 (2022-07-11 08:15:05+00:00): Hallo,

bitte hör auf mit diesen falschen Edits. Die Hst hat keinen Nenszusatz Schwendermarkt. Das ist also im Namen falsch. Der Name Tag ist nicht für Werbung oder Als Touristenwegweisee gedacht. Ich revertiere das noch ein mal, und dann lasst es bitte wie es ist.

Auch dein anderer Edit mit name=Zweckentfremdung scheint mir exakt das zu sein: Zweckentfremdung des name-Tags. Dazu gibt es notes o.ä wenn überhaupt nötig.
Wilmer Osario (2022-07-12 12:57:02+00:00): ¿Por qué marca las calles de los barrios con la etiqueta [access=no]?

Siguen siendo calles de acceso público por lo que ésta etiqueta es indebida. Solo se usaría en caso que hubiese alguna barrera física que impida que un vehículo transite por allí, como por ejemplo, un portón.
Harfeur (2022-07-11 08:11:22+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de vérifier votre changement, et celui-ci a l'air correct.
Merci beaucoup pour votre aide !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123448882
Colin Smale (2022-07-11 07:50:00+00:00): You seem only to have removed the area=* tag. May I ask why?
im-mad (2022-07-11 10:21:49+00:00): The tag was causing an error. I removed it until I find the correct one
Colin Smale (2022-07-11 10:26:48+00:00): What error was it causing? It's a perfectly valid tag, used in many places.
im-mad (2022-07-11 10:53:07+00:00): I meant to change it to area=yes

The error I got 'wrong value: area=*, use area=yes or area=no instead (1)'
Colin Smale (2022-07-11 12:26:50+00:00): That's a different concept. Area=yes makes it explicit that the object is the entire area within the polygon (think of a field), whereas area=no means that the object is only the perimeter (think of hedges). In this case area=yes is implicit because it's a boundary. The numerical value is being used here to hold the area in hectares. I agree this is not how it is documented, however it is not very friendly to delete someone else's data. Have you considered posting a question on the tagging mailing list? There may be a better "home" for the area in hectares.
MxxCon (2022-07-11 15:49:05+00:00): Hello.
Looking at the satellite imagery it seems like this traffic light applies to both, E7th and Ave C. Could you please elaborate why did you remove this tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123449260
mariotomo (2022-08-23 15:38:37+00:00): oops!
:-D
you put a few short sections of the motorway as 'steps'.
noticed thanks to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125246229
I'll fix the remaining ones. :-)
Rick Morales (2022-08-23 17:55:22+00:00): My bad, sorry about that. Thanks for getting it fixed!
Mex (2022-07-17 21:08:32+00:00): Thanks for the fix.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123449760
ChrissW-R1 (2022-07-20 13:58:21+00:00): What is the tag "name:cz" for?
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-07-20 14:07:24+00:00): Where?
ChrissW-R1 (2022-07-21 09:01:08+00:00): In the following features I changed name:cz to name:cs. CS is the right code for Czech language according to ISO 639-1.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czech_language
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names

https://openstreetmap.org/way/24399963/history
https://openstreetmap.org/node/7834855786/history
https://openstreetmap.org/node/355300858/history
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-07-21 09:56:31+00:00): I know. Thanks. But I think the key name:cs is unnecessary, plenty is enough name. Thanks!
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-07-21 10:10:04+00:00): Yeah, Alza. I don't know why iD Editor offeres in revolve issue add name:cz. I will must to report it.
MxxCon (2022-07-11 16:15:25+00:00): Hello.
It seems like you tagged trees as benches here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123449946
kw-ny (2022-07-11 16:19:15+00:00): The benches here are right next to the trees - I was just sitting there this weekend hence I tagged it.  Not sure the benches are showing up in the satellite photo but they are there ... perhaps it's better to tag the trees then and the benches next to them?  These are small trees planted in a concrete basin (large flower pot) - how do we tag them?
MxxCon (2022-07-11 16:24:51+00:00): I think i see it, it's like benches on 4 sides of it?
If so, you should map the tree and you could map the 4 benches with direction tag for each.
MxxCon (2022-07-11 16:29:01+00:00): Hello.
You added a couple of features to what appears to be light rail stops. Are they fully enclosed buildings or just roof with open sides?

Also could you please write a bit more descriptive changeset comments? "added additional detail" for every changeset is really vague to understand what you are trying to map. It doesn't have to be super detailed, but it shouldn't be completely useless. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123450013
kw-ny (2022-07-11 16:32:41+00:00): It's a roof with open sides.  It's a study permanent roof.  I copied the exact same roof from ESSEX ST (next stop) and copied it to MARIN BLVD and JERSEY AVE stop..

It looks like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jersey_Avenue_station_%28Hudson%E2%80%93Bergen_Light_Rail%29#/media/File:Jersey_Avenue_HBLR_Station_west_end.jpg

RE: better comments, will do
MxxCon (2022-07-11 17:09:10+00:00): Perhaps a more accurate tag for them would be building=roof
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=roof
kw-ny (2022-07-11 17:41:39+00:00): You're the expert so you have the final say - but I looked at Essex St, which was already tagged with a shelter and I simply copied what it had to 2 other station. All stations have the same roof and the same design so I assumed Essex St was already set-up correctly.  It's a proper station shelter and it's very permanent and made out of metal.
Udarian (2022-07-11 00:26:39+00:00): typo, I meant  communication
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123450173
qm20_ (2022-07-11 00:11:53+00:00): ...efehlt und sind so klarer einzuzeichnen.
mottiger (2022-11-20 19:22:24+00:00): Höi WAM

Der name-Tag eignet sich meiner Meinung nach nicht dafür, was du genau erreichen willst.
Darf ich fragen welches Ziel das Start/Ende-Taging von Treppen hat? Und wäre eine solche Beschreibung nicht eher besser in description=* aufgehoben?

Liebe Grüsse
WAM_SNZ144_ZCH (2022-11-20 21:27:29+00:00): Guete Abig
Deine Frage ist berechtig, Das Start/Ende Taging hilft den Disponenten auf der Notrufzentrale 144 gezielt den Standort zu ermitteln. Es ist je nach Karteneinstellung teilweise schwierig zu erkennen wo der Start einer Treppe ist sofern man nicht mit Höhenkurven arbeitet oder in diesem Gebiet heimisch ist. (z.b Hühnenberg-Treppe, eine Person stürzt am Ende der Treppe? Für die Ambulanzzufahrt sehr wichtig die richtige Zufahrtsstrasse zu nehmen. Auf der Karte ist jedoch nicht sofort ersichtlich, wo der tiefere Punkt und somit der Start dieser Treppe ist. Gerne kann man das Umschreiben oder entfernen, sofern dies störend wirken sollte. Mir ist jedoch bewusst, dass es für die Allgemeinheit eher irrelevant sein wird und daher kann ich dies auch beschriften über das Private Tool wo alle sensiblen Daten ergänzt werden wenn das der Wunsch der Community sein sollte. Als Randnotiz sehe ich gravierende Erfassungsfehler die wichtiger wären zu korrigieren wie z.B ganze Zuggleise, die am HB-Luzern über ein 5-stöckiges Parkhaus eingezeichnet wurden, etc. Ich gebe Ihnen die Berechtigung alle meinen Start/Ziel Taggings zu entfernen, wenn sie Lust und die Zeit dafür haben. Liebe Grüsse Marcel
mottiger (2022-11-20 21:42:14+00:00): Höi Marcel

Störend finde ich es nur, weil es mir einen Hinweis gibt "Ah, das wird  anscheinend für etwas gebraucht, im Moment wird dafür aber noch ein Tag "missbraucht"". Finde es hochinteressant, dass OSM auch bei der Notrufzentral 144 genutzt wird.
Nicht immer fragen Mapper nach, wenn sie Fehler entdecken. Ich möchte nicht, dass diese doch wichtigen Informationen verloren gehen, falls es mal jemanden packen würde und einfach drüber löscht.

Würde ein umtaggen in description noch den selben Zweck erfüllen?

Den Bahnhof schaue ich mir mal. Das ist eher ein Ungetüm, an welches ich mich noch nicht gewagt habe.

Liebe Grüsse
Auch Marcel
RussNelson (2022-07-11 12:05:57+00:00): Hey, thanks for trying to be a good editor, but I'm going to have to revert these. I've been everywhere in New York State, and if I add something, it should be there.
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-11 23:45:17+00:00): But they don't exist and have no remnants on the latest satellite imagery.  Non-existent items should not be mapped.  They have no traces remaining, no ties, signals or other objects.  All wiki pages, OSM practices and guidance outline that only things that exist or have some form of trace (ties, rails, signals, etc.) that meet the definition of "razed" should be mapped.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_for_the_renderer

If we're going to map what used to be railways, we need to start mapping the former paths of waterways, such as rivers.  What about woods that have since been cut down.  I think we need to start adding natural=wood + wood=razed to all the farmlands and golf courses.  What about all the former alignment of roadways and what clearly used to be roadways?

I've been a lot of places, but there is definitely no railway, abandoned, razed or orther wise, that goes through people's living rooms, across freeways, or through schools.
RussNelson (2022-07-12 01:45:26+00:00): Have you been to Batavia?
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-12 03:03:52+00:00): Not sure how that is relevant, but yes I have, lived down the street for a few years.  Still visit occasionally...

Have you, yourseld, been to Batavia?  What about Chili?  or Scottsville?  Henrietta?
RussNelson (2022-07-12 13:50:47+00:00): Yup, yup, yup, and yup. Specifically to research abandoned railroads. Which you deleted because you didn't see them.
Skunkman56 (2022-07-13 22:52:42+00:00): Check the terrain data from Lidar- the track ballast and cuts may still be evident, allowing one to see the grade on the ground by dedicated survey: https://apps.nationalmap.gov/3depdem/ overgrown with trees may obscure it from leaf-off aerial imagery, but doesn't mean its not there. Might as well delete a bunch of tree-overhung streams and roads if using that logic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
OddlyAngled (2022-07-15 15:16:52+00:00): looks like you just deleted a node, not the way. did you intend to whack the whole thing or just the lower half?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123451505
erutan (2022-07-24 03:15:18+00:00): Good catch - I was wondering why it stayed up and figured there might be a delay. :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123451505
Allison P (2022-07-11 04:28:52+00:00): Perhaps this was done elsewhere too, but looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10060883 I'm wondering why you removed the TIGER prefix on the zip code tags but left the rest of the key and tag. Also, the surface looks different on aerial than what's given in the tag. What's your source?
txemt (2022-07-11 19:49:45+00:00): I was removing the TIGER data, but keeping relevant data on the segment. 

As far as the surface, it flip flops between the concrete and asphalt on almost every other segment. I didn't see a need to fragment the entire length of the road for surface structure and just rolled with CONCRETE instead of ASPHALT. It seems there are more concrete segments than asphalt segments, and that was my main determining factor on choosing concrete.

Yes, the section between AT&T Way and North Carolina Avenue is asphalt, but in looking at the totality of the road, I put it as CONCRETE. If this particular road were to be 10 miles long and change at the midway point, or even ¼ of the way down and not flip flopping between the two, I'd place a different surface type for those.
Allison P (2022-07-11 20:13:58+00:00): You should not do this. The surface tag should reflect exactly the road segments that have that surface. Split the way if necessary.
Trevor_1 (2022-07-11 22:42:15+00:00): What he said is incorrect. I'm looking at NearMap and this entire segment from Truman Street to the bridge at Johnson Creek is asphalt. Most of it is just faded except the newly paved section. Only the bridge is concrete. 

Also, the "lanes" and "maxspeed" values are wrong. Most of this road is actually a 4 lane road with a speed limit of 35. Only the section west of North Collins Street is 2 lanes, with a speed limit of 30 (not 25). Looking at Google Street View, the speed limits on many nearby roads that were also edited are also 30, not 25.
txemt (2022-07-12 01:26:26+00:00): Allison, I tried looking for it in the wiki, but was unable to find that info. I was able to find a generic wiki page in regards to tagging surfaces, but I wasn't able to find a more specific page. If you could direct me to it, that'd be much appreciated.
Allison P (2022-07-12 01:39:30+00:00): It is just common sense. Marking even a single foot of asphalt as concrete is wrong and devalues other information. I highly doubt others would disagree.
txemt (2022-07-12 01:42:29+00:00): I see it from a different angle, which I stated earlier. But when it comes to road surfaces, how much information is being devalued? 

Also, common sense is not so common, it's not teachable, and it means something different to everyone.
Trevor_1 (2022-07-11 04:11:00+00:00): Why are you spending so much of your time entering wrong information? There are hundreds of roads you tagged as concrete and they're actually asphalt, and vice versa. It's clear that you don't know what you're doing.
ikopanjirukmana (2022-08-12 09:34:46+00:00): Hi rtnf,
saya melihat kamu menambahkan sekolah SMAN 19 Kota Bekasi. namun saya melihat pada citra Maxar Premium Imagery dan beberapa citra lainnya tidak terdapat bangunan di lokasi itu, hanya ada hamparan kosong. apa kamu kontributor lokal di tempat tersebut? dari mana kamu tau lokasi ini?
Terima kasih
user_13006008 (2022-08-12 09:58:16+00:00): Iya. Saya kontributor lokal. Adik saya sekarang bersekolah disitu. Peta yang saya tambahkan di OSM dibuat berdasarkan survei lapangan langsung yang saya lakukan sendiri. Saya bisa melampirkan beberapa foto foto & denah resmi sekolah jika diperlukan.
ikopanjirukmana (2022-08-12 10:05:22+00:00): Terima kasih untuk informasinya yang cukup lengkap di lokasi ini.
Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2022-07-12 01:55:54+00:00): 不用因為回報的名字錯了，就把整棟建築刪除，請移除名稱就好了
再來是廠區非建築，請只畫建築範圍就好，不要包整個廠區範圍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123452472
Serzhanya (2022-07-11 06:43:41+00:00): Не стоит менять "highway=primary" на "highway=trunk" из-за того, что трасса перешла в федеральную собственность. Значения ключа "highway" присваиваются по другому принципу. А чтобы указать, что дорога является дорогой федерального значения, надо в отношении маршрута https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3950407 сменить значение ключа "network" c "ru:regional" на "ru:national".
pozdnyroman (2022-07-11 21:59:03+00:00): Сделал по аналогии с двумя трассами ЮС - Холмск и ЮС- Корсаков
Serzhanya (2022-07-15 11:57:30+00:00): Разные уровни. Холмская и Корсаковские трассы соединяют область через порты с транспортной сетью остальной России (и других стран). Тогда как Охинская трасса соединяет районы области с областным центром. Поэтому для А-391 и А-392 подходит highway=trunk, а для А=393 больше подходит highway=primary, переходящий в secondary.
Supaplex (2022-07-12 01:46:49+00:00): 您好

你好像把私人的地點，例如家的位置上傳到 OpenStreetMap 了。OpenStreetMap 是開放授權的地理資訊系統，不允許非公開，私人的內容
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123452710
dadavid (2022-08-03 09:41:08+00:00): Hallo, 

verläuft die Reuss hier wirklich in einem Tunnel (Rohr / Düker, also tunnel=culvert) ? 

VG
David
WAM_SNZ144_ZCH (2022-08-09 10:15:14+00:00): Nein, bei gewissen Brücken waren die Gehwege oder Strassen nicht als Brücke getagt worden und daher entstanden die Fehlermeldungen bei der Reuss. Ich habe jetzt die Tunnels entfernt und dafür die Gehwege etc. auf den Brücken ergänzt. Jetzt hat es geklappt....:-)
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-11 17:45:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Warin61 (2022-08-17 00:37:22+00:00): Bing can have offset errors ... use DCS Imagery and Base Map for better accuracy