piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 00:10:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:15:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:32:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:35:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:12:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:00:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:26:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:22:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:38:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:20:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:08:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-15 08:21:44+00:00): Looks like you attached the park to the street's centerline, which definitely wouldn't be accurate.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:32:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-15 08:20:52+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55450634
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-15 08:17:48+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55450652
mavl (2018-12-24 23:32:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:43:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:23:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:21:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
anu_bala (2019-04-17 02:15:46+00:00): Hi Patrick bous,

Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across
"way 546637071"
classified as un-classified. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
As of now making necessary changes, Please revert if it is otherwise.

Thanks in Advance
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-15 08:16:06+00:00): Is this a footway or is it a path?  If it's narrow and primarily built for walking, then, footway is appropriate (and if it's open to bicycles despite that, then bicycle=yes should be added).  Otherwise, highway=path, foot=yes, bicycle=yes might be a better set of tags.
rockylizard (2018-01-25 20:22:15+00:00): Google Earth Imagery shows narrow, apparently primarily built for walking footpath.
user_5359 (2018-01-15 17:03:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: If you use the key leisure, you didn't need to add the key area.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:17:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:31:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:05:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
AkuAnakTimur (2018-01-15 07:01:34+00:00): 2 cents: probably this could belong to SK Teruntum https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553181919

SK St Thomas could be mapped as a single node inside the SK Teruntum's area, while this note can be included in the description=* field of SK St Thomas. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1268684
user_3151354 (2018-01-15 07:18:31+00:00): Done. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55452111#map=18/3.81025/103.32576
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:46:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-15 17:34:37+00:00): Hi shahriar, beginning with this changeset, you created almost 1,900 changesets within 8 hours. But overall it seems that you modified "only" the location of 10 different POIs. Is it correct that you used the iD editor? Could you please describe your intention of your map changes? Thanks.

Some more information about your recent edits: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?uid=1198788#7/23.604/90.291
mavl (2018-12-24 23:30:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:45:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:36:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
RSergei (2018-01-15 08:45:53+00:00): Здравствуйте, я так понимаю Вы представитель данной сети ресторанов. Я рад что Вы добавляете и исправляете информацию о данных ресторанах. Но, прошу Вас соблюдать правила OSM, так нет необходимости ставить адрес на точку, если она уже находится внутри здания, имеющим адрес. Как в данном случае. К тому-же адрес как "8Б", а не "8 Б" как Вы поставили. Прошу Вас исправить, по всем Вашим правкам. Спасибо.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
user_5359 (2018-01-15 17:06:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2019-11-13 04:36:12+00:00): greating to runrunshow.
i've check and come crossing to peninsular malaysia. there's so many living_street taging in area. i think its should be tag as residential. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Malaysian_Roads_Tagging) . do you mind to share whats your source to determine road classification? i've check that you always add road tagging in several area.


thank you. Happy Mapping
Baloo Uriza (2018-05-19 03:00:11+00:00): Just noticed this, that was an inaccurate edit, the road just opened today.

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/OKDOT/bulletins/1f10dd9

It should have remained as construction until it opened.
yaswap (2019-07-10 07:04:50+00:00): Hi Paul Johnson,

Thanks for the review and apologies for the delayed response. Its a mistake from myside removing the tag. Thanks for reverting. 

We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards,
yaswap.
user_5359 (2018-01-15 17:10:39+00:00): Hello! Please check the position of the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/597136399. I assumed, that this address is placed on the other side of the Cottonwood Ave.

I you need help: You are welcome.
village (2018-01-15 07:14:04+00:00): inhaltlich entspricht das Tagging jetzt dem Wiki, aber von der Funktion ist dies eigentlich "eine Post" (wohl das komplette Postdienstleistungssortiment, Papierwaren und Kopierer, evtl. ein paar Zeitschriften(?) als Ergänzung. Soll man das nicht lieber als Post (amenity=post_office) taggen? auch wenn es rechtlich anders ist
*Martin* (2018-01-17 09:31:58+00:00): Ahoj JBelej. Naozaj su tam v lese polia? Na ohrady je lepsie barrier=fence.
JBelej (2018-01-17 12:33:28+00:00): Sú to oplotené ohrady (neviem načo budú lesníkom). Kde nájdem barrier/fence?
*Martin* (2018-01-17 12:36:22+00:00): iD editor nepouzivam, ale viem ze ma moznost pridat lubovolne tagy, takze aj tag s klucom barrier a hodnotou fence. Pre normalnu editaciu mapy odporucam editor JOSM.
rab (2018-01-15 17:47:02+00:00): School really?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:51:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
iandees (2018-01-15 14:49:58+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your contribution. I had to remove your park area because the university is already included on our map and is not a park.
Constable (2018-01-18 11:26:40+00:00): hi there, this one looks like a fake park, why did you add it?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5340309464
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-15 16:54:00+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55452940
Davie Dean (2018-01-15 09:54:05+00:00): Are you stalking me, @ClipArtJoel?
Joel Hansen (2018-01-15 10:06:21+00:00): @David Dean, I'm giving you a head start :P
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-15 16:58:16+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55453172
mtmail (2020-02-10 00:02:50+00:00): Was the URL meant to be in a 'note' tag? I can't seem to find the name of the stream in the news article.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
bluetable (2018-01-15 08:24:12+00:00): As per documentation, a service area "usually consist of, at minimum, a petrol station, parking facilities, a place to eat and some public toilets". Hansens Holz lacking the petrol station, I think it should be tagged as a rest area, IMHO.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=services
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:47:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:29:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
highflyer74 (2018-01-16 14:08:08+00:00): Hello!

Could you please try to get rid of all the Non-OSM data on these buildings?

There are things like 

LAYER=Appartment
OBJECTID=0
OBJECTID_1=61186
Shape_Area=3.44908839229E-8
Shape_Leng=7.64116604918E-4

which do not belong into OSM, also there is "addr_place=*" which is a wrong key, and the correct key "addr:place=*" is used in a wrong way. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr for correct use. 

Thank you!
eggie (2018-01-15 10:12:40+00:00): Leisure park is alleen een functie voor een bepaald gebied en geen landuse.
De landuse grass, forest is belangrijker. Niet elk stukje groen is een park. Wat wil je bereiken met deze edit?
Je hebt al eerder uitleg gekregen hoe wel een park te mappen.
Graag reactie
eggie (2018-01-15 10:25:27+00:00): Wijzigingenset #55457691
eggie (2018-01-15 10:37:22+00:00): Je Leisure park heb ik omgezet in een Leisure=pitch met sport skateboard. Ok losgemaakt van de residential. De overige landuse is ingevuld. Parkedits liggen momenteel onder een vergrootglas wegens de verkeerde massale omtagging van landuse naar Leisure (functie)  door pokemongo mappers.
Rendering duurt hier even.
eggie (2018-01-15 10:14:19+00:00): Het gebied van je edit is zo groot omdat je een way hebt geplakt aan de residential van Deventer. Dit geeft ellende bij verschuivingen. Ik overweeg de edit terug te draaien.
eggie (2018-01-15 10:24:03+00:00): reverted by · Wijzigingenset #55457642
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-15 16:58:34+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55454141
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-15 16:59:20+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55454458
Digne (2018-01-15 12:04:33+00:00): Hallo Borry,

Ik zag dat er om feedback was gevraagd.

Het ziet er goed uit, alleen ik denk dat het handig is om een objecttype toe te wijzen aan het punt. Hierbij kan gedacht worden aan een monument (historic=monument) of kunstwerk (tourism=artrwork). Op die manier wordt het punt ook op de kaart getekend.
eggie (2018-01-15 10:18:00+00:00): Hier heb je de landuse verwijderd. je edit wordt teruggezet.
eggie (2018-01-15 10:22:52+00:00): reverted by Wijzigingenset #55457605
eggie (2018-01-15 10:17:12+00:00): Een losse cover is inderdaad de goede manier om een park te mappen, maar hier zie ik ook weer de landuse grass verdwijnen bij de Cruijffcourt. Wat is je bedoeling?
LingParty (2018-01-17 07:43:52+00:00): Mijn bedoeling was inderdaad om het Venenpark, netjes als dusdanig te identificeren. Sorry, ben een nieuwe gebruiker van OpenStreetMap en zie nu pas de feedback.