piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OSM-Bot (2017-02-15 13:24:20+00:00): Hier sind zwei Fehler enthalten, wird korrigiert.
ansonsten hätte Google schnell geholfen:
https://www.google.de/search?q=u-Bahnhof+ICC&rlz=1C1FGUR_deDE702DE702&espv=2&biw=1920&bih=974&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj5gr2GmZLSAhWLvRQKHVR3CdsQ_AUICCgD#imgrc=-kTmfoyn_eNsfM:
Normalerweise kannst Du mit dem Auto in den Gleiströgen rumfahren und bei Regen geschützt durch den Bahnhof gehen.
brettmalott (2017-01-25 20:53:57+00:00): Actualizaciones en Paraguay Reconomiento cartográfico 2016 por KG.
brettmalott (2017-02-01 17:17:00+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
chillly (2017-01-23 19:58:45+00:00): welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail. We only add names to objects that are verifiable names. Is the name really  'Path across Foulshields Bing'? Most paths have no names, they are just paths.
user_5359 (2017-01-23 21:10:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If you paint a building, please close the ways (also, if a line from an other building exists). And add the tag building= yes.

If you need help: You are welcome!
literan (2018-10-31 05:52:56+00:00): и зачем вы везде в теге name продублировали тип объекта (парковка, каток и т.п.)? По правилам туда пишется только имя собственное. Вычистил все.
Hjart (2017-01-23 21:49:47+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig lige at fikse stedet så det rent faktisk er tagget ifølge standard tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dkindergarten
brettmalott (2017-01-25 20:53:30+00:00): Actualizaciones en Paraguay Reconomiento cartográfico 2016 por KG.
brettmalott (2017-02-01 17:15:29+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
SK53 (2017-01-24 14:02:24+00:00): Hi Mike,

These may have been inappropriate for the name tag, but the first one I looked at had useful mappable information in the tag (light vehicles only) which you have removed.

I'd prefer if you actually moved name=>description than deleted the tag.
brettmalott (2017-01-25 20:52:12+00:00): Actualizaciones en Paraguay Reconomiento cartográfico 2016 por KG.
brettmalott (2017-02-01 17:15:05+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
brettmalott (2017-02-01 17:16:20+00:00): Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento terrestre por #Kaart 2016.
Commodoortje (2017-01-24 23:59:24+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468097115
leisure=pitch heb ik inmiddels aangevuld met sport=handball
Hier kun je meer lezen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch
AndreasTUHU (2017-01-25 11:05:46+00:00): Ez így nem lesz jó. 2 épület van egymásra rajzolva plusz egy fél körvonal.
qsa (2017-01-25 11:27:25+00:00): Kedves András!
Tény, hogy kétszer rajzoltam. Ugyanis az első rajznál az épület vége megakadt az utcai szaggatott vonalnál amelyiken valamennyi épület átlapolt. Nos a pontosság kedvéért a házat az utcában lévő házig előrehúztam. Nos így tényleg pontos, de az előző rajz vonala ettől valahogy becsúszott a másik mögé.
Az osztrák nagykövet rezidenciája (egykori Semsey kastély) rendkivül szép és díszes kovácsoltvas kerítését, kapuját is berajzoltam a két képület közé a 25/a házzal szemközt. Sajnos nem jelent meg.
Amúgy 55 éve lakom a Csaba utcában, ugrásnyira ettől a helytől, és még átépítés előtt láttam a lepusztult kastélyt is ahol most az osztrák nagykövet lakik. (Azóta persze csak az mehet be akinek a portaszolgálat kinyitja a kaput.)
Erről a szűkebb pátriámról ld. itt:
http://www.okotaj.hu/szamok/02/korny5.html
üdvözlettel: Lontai Sándor
corfede (2017-02-01 16:48:17+00:00): Ciao Valerio, come già spiegato in privato, con questo e altri changeset hai ricopiato fedelmente tutti i POI presenti su Google Maps, violando le regole di Google, le regole di OSM e inquinando la mappa con informazioni spesso inesatte. Inoltre spesso sono stati inseriti POI già mappati con aree, creando inutili sovrapposizioni. Per questo motivo ritengo sia opportuno eseguirne il revert.
mcheck (2017-02-01 20:35:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45726777 where the changeset comment is:
yurasi (2017-01-24 14:39:48+00:00): Hi Crazydoge,
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you've deleted and added some objects, but this objects added not coincide with Bing satellite imagery.  It would be great if you can let the community know the reason behind removing these features from the map and also share the source which can be referred to. Also a parking can't be inside of a building.
Crazydoge (2017-01-24 14:55:17+00:00): I have removed the parking. The Bing maps are a few years out of date. Buildings and parking that are shown in the satellite images were torn down and replaced with a new apartment building. This building can be seen in Google and HERE maps. 

There is a courtyard in the middle of the building, but I don't know how to add that.
yurasi (2017-01-25 14:13:05+00:00): 
Hi.
I see that you was upload this changeset with the information of BIng imagery
The changeset that you was upload has as "Imagery=Bing aerial imagery", but you was guided with Google and Here maps. In Openstreetmap can't use imagery private, only should add objects with free imagery or  knowledge local. I recommend change the data source in your changeset. Please note my recomendation, that way you going to avoid notifications to future. 
Greetings.
Crazydoge (2017-01-25 22:29:11+00:00): Do you mean that I can confirm this building exists if I have local knowledge of the area?
yurasi (2017-01-26 14:23:24+00:00): Any person can add objects if they have local knowledge. But the OSM community check if these objects really exist for avoid vandalism in the map.
Владимир К (2017-05-17 06:47:44+00:00): Подобные данные по сути вандализм. Вы дублируете здания еще одним зданием-точкой внутри. Это неприемлемо. Или переносите свои теги на контуры домов и удаляйте точки, либо удаляйте теги здания с точек. Если вы это не исправите, то ваши точки просто откатят
Felipe Alves (2017-01-24 16:05:07+00:00): Victor, isso seria um bar? Não tem o nome dele, ou mais informações?
Bob (2017-04-11 19:52:02+00:00): Moin!
Eine no_entry restriction (hier: Deine Änderung an der Relation 6848355) kann mehrere from-Mitglieder haben, so steht es im Wiki. Das gelöschte Mitglied habe ich daher wiederhergestellt. Das aufgestellte Zeichen 267 betrifft beide Richtungen.
mueschel (2017-04-11 20:02:08+00:00): Auf den meisten Wiki-Seiten steht "exakt 1", auch auf der Deutschen. Nur die tschechische und englische Seite erlauben mehrere für no_entry.

Ich würde die Relation vielleicht lieber verdoppeln, je eine für jeden from-Weg. Wer weiß, welcher Router damit Probleme hat.
Peilscheibe (2017-04-12 10:42:00+00:00): @mueschel: Die no_entry und no_exit-restrictions wurden ja genau zu dem Zweck so definiert, das man eben nicht mehrere Relationen braucht, wo eine genügt. Wenn ein Router nicht mit mehreren from- bzw. to-ways klarkommt, darf er gerne dazulernen.
Bob (2017-04-12 15:54:14+00:00): Moin zusammen!
Die deutsche Wiki-Seite ist dazu leider wohl veraltet. Sie kennt die no_entry und no_exit restriction (noch) nicht. Die kamen erst 2011 hinzu und die Übersetzung hat noch keiner angepackt.
corfede (2017-02-01 16:48:10+00:00): Ciao Valerio, come già spiegato in privato, con questo e altri changeset hai ricopiato fedelmente tutti i POI presenti su Google Maps, violando le regole di Google, le regole di OSM e inquinando la mappa con informazioni spesso inesatte. Inoltre spesso sono stati inseriti POI già mappati con aree, creando inutili sovrapposizioni. Per questo motivo ritengo sia opportuno eseguirne il revert.
mcheck (2017-02-01 20:31:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45726702 where the changeset comment is:
dvdhoven (2017-01-24 07:10:44+00:00): Ik heb je rotonde aanpassing weer aangepast. Het stuk fietspad tussen Pannekoekendijk en Burgemeester Roelenweg is nl 2 richting, niet 1 richting. Logisch want je wilt de dikke stroom fietsers daar niet de hele rotonde rond laten rijden.
En door jouw aanpassingen was ook het fietsknooppuntennetwerk in de fout gegaan.
En geen junction=roundabout op fietspaden aub. junction=roundabout geeft namelijk automatisch eenrichting en aangezien er op rotondes nog al eens gedeeltelijk of geheel tweerichting is, geeft junction=roundabout problemen. En van oneway=no trekt junction=roundabout zich niks aan.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
SemYakimov (2017-01-23 21:59:10+00:00): Лыжный маршрут Морозки - Калистово
corfede (2017-02-01 16:48:02+00:00): Ciao Valerio, come già spiegato in privato, con questo e altri changeset hai ricopiato fedelmente tutti i POI presenti su Google Maps, violando le regole di Google, le regole di OSM e inquinando la mappa con informazioni spesso inesatte. Inoltre spesso sono stati inseriti POI già mappati con aree, creando inutili sovrapposizioni. Per questo motivo ritengo sia opportuno eseguirne il revert.
mcheck (2017-02-01 20:29:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45726655 where the changeset comment is:
corfede (2017-02-01 16:47:55+00:00): Ciao Valerio, come già spiegato in privato, con questo e altri changeset hai ricopiato fedelmente tutti i POI presenti su Google Maps, violando le regole di Google, le regole di OSM e inquinando la mappa con informazioni spesso inesatte. Inoltre spesso sono stati inseriti POI già mappati con aree, creando inutili sovrapposizioni. Per questo motivo ritengo sia opportuno eseguirne il revert.
mcheck (2017-02-01 20:27:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45726648 where the changeset comment is:
SomeoneElse (2017-01-23 22:28:08+00:00): "shop changes" in the changeset comment turned out to be "no shop changes needed because all of the ones that I looked at matched".
corfede (2017-02-01 16:47:41+00:00): Ciao Valerio, come già spiegato in privato, con questo e altri changeset hai ricopiato fedelmente tutti i POI presenti su Google Maps, violando le regole di Google, le regole di OSM e inquinando la mappa con informazioni spesso inesatte. Inoltre spesso sono stati inseriti POI già mappati con aree, creando inutili sovrapposizioni. Per questo motivo ritengo sia opportuno eseguirne il revert.
mcheck (2017-02-01 20:26:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45726636 where the changeset comment is:
corfede (2017-02-01 16:47:34+00:00): Ciao Valerio, come già spiegato in privato, con questo e altri changeset hai ricopiato fedelmente tutti i POI presenti su Google Maps, violando le regole di Google, le regole di OSM e inquinando la mappa con informazioni spesso inesatte. Inoltre spesso sono stati inseriti POI già mappati con aree, creando inutili sovrapposizioni. Per questo motivo ritengo sia opportuno eseguirne il revert.
mcheck (2017-02-01 20:26:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45726597 where the changeset comment is:
corfede (2017-02-01 16:47:29+00:00): Ciao Valerio, come già spiegato in privato, con questo e altri changeset hai ricopiato fedelmente tutti i POI presenti su Google Maps, violando le regole di Google, le regole di OSM e inquinando la mappa con informazioni spesso inesatte. Inoltre spesso sono stati inseriti POI già mappati con aree, creando inutili sovrapposizioni. Per questo motivo ritengo sia opportuno eseguirne il revert.
mcheck (2017-02-01 20:18:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45726386 where the changeset comment is:
Ogmios (2017-01-26 09:51:53+00:00):  👍
Commodoortje (2017-01-23 23:26:46+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
DD1GJ (2017-01-24 08:19:33+00:00): Hallo Natriumchlorid, willkommen bei OSM. Stadtpläne sind meistens urheberrechtlich geschützt und dürfen ohne ausdrückliche Genehmigung nicht für OSM genutzt werden. Welche Informationen stammen vom Stadtplan? Die müssten wieder gelöscht werden.
Nakaner (2017-01-24 12:19:16+00:00): Hallo NaCl,

ich kann die Aussage von DD1GJ nur bestätigen. Deine Beiträge sind nicht nur illegal, sondern auch noch maximal falsch. (Klartext: Müll) Ich bin in den beiden Orten seit Jahrzehnten ortskundig. Der offizielle Stadtplan ist leider nur in Ablage P gut aufgehoben, wenn man ihn nicht als Lehrbeispiel für Eastereggs o.ä. im Geographie-Unterricht oder juristischen Vorlesungen einsetzen möchte.

Ich werde diesen Änderungssatz zurücksetzen und mir den Rest deiner Beiträge ansehen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner-repair (2017-01-24 16:07:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45440284 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets which copied data from &quot;Stadtplan Brackenheim&quot;, map2.hirsch-woelfl.de and &quot;Stadtplan Heilbronn&quot;. The data contains lots of errors and maybe even some easter eggs.
Polarbear (2017-01-23 23:30:03+00:00): Typo in CS comment, this is Neukölln of course.
aharvey (2017-07-15 06:40:02+00:00): Could you please explain what this is? If you want to tag a backyard swimming pool, use leisure=swimming_pool, access=private.
Commodoortje (2017-01-24 09:08:12+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleren middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuilding tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-24 09:12:30+00:00): Je hebt de speelplaats aangeduid dat er internet toegang is. Is dit een vergissing of is het werkelijk zo?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7uhvkn1mqd2qmat/2017-01-24_10-10-37.png?raw=1
just_Addict (2017-01-24 10:24:58+00:00): Dit is geen vergissing. Er is inderdaad een open WiFi hotspot aanwezig. Tevens is het niet alleen een speelplaats. Die zit in de hoek van het veld. De rest is tegenwoordig meer ingericht als recreatieveld met o.a. een omheind voetbal/basketbal veld met speciale bodembedekking.
just_Addict (2017-01-24 10:28:43+00:00): Ten aanzien van je voorkeur voor te gebruiken editors. Helaas kan ik hier op mijn mobieltje geen gebruik van maken daar het scherm hier te klein voor is. 

Aangezien MAPS.ME mij de mogelijkheid biedt kan ik niet anders concluderen dat zij hiervoor toestemming hebben gekregen. Mocht je het hier niet mee eens zijn dan adviseer ik je kontakt op te nemen met de makers van MAPS.ME om deze funktie te laten verwijderen.
just_Addict (2017-01-24 10:32:20+00:00): Buiten dat wordt MAPS.ME zelfs vermeld als een van de mogelijke editors op mobiele apparaten met iOS 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Apple_iOS
Commodoortje (2017-01-24 17:56:39+00:00): Ik geef aan dat het geen optimale editor is en vaak nazorg nodig heeft.
Natuurlijk is OSM blij met nieuwe mappers, hopelijk verdiep je je in de mogelijkheden van OSM en andere editors.
Veel map plezier.
Commodoortje (2017-01-26 23:43:39+00:00): Ik wil je overigens niet weerhouden om POI's toe te voegen aan OSM.
Misschien vind je het ook interessant om (later) een andere editor te bekijken en te gebruiken. JOSM, Potlatch of ID
﻿OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
nammala (2017-01-24 04:49:23+00:00): Hi Squiddo,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The OSM is a crowd sourced project and every data we add should be ground truth and informative. So the footways you added seems inappropriate I am going ahead and deleting the footways.

Regards,
nammala
JeSe-MX (2017-05-13 18:10:52+00:00): El establecimiento ¿Esta en medio de la calle?
Filip Franek (2017-05-13 18:50:16+00:00): Si, yo use mi GPS por el direccion. No se si es exacto, pero es solamente una abuela que vende gorditas. Quizas esta abrierta en la noche. Puedes verla en puerto de la calle
JeSe-MX (2017-05-13 22:41:41+00:00): Muy bien, solamente habrá que agregar los horarios, pues podrá generar confusión al momento de buscar algún lugar de comida.

También siento que habrá que corregir el nombre, pero ya se hará In Situ.
TheSwavu (2017-01-24 10:52:12+00:00): Hi,

You shouldn't be copying from Google maps as we don't have permission to do that.

You can use the LPI base map which in iD is found under the background control.


Thanks.
explorewiki (2017-01-24 21:25:56+00:00): Thanks, I didn't realise. Will use LPI base map in the future.
dgitto (2017-01-24 06:43:37+00:00): you removed the name tag from the hotel. If you mean that the hotel is only located into the building then we have to move on the building also all the other tags (tourism=hotel and contacts)
tonyf1 (2017-12-09 23:19:01+00:00): Removed reservoir tag from backyard swimming pool, tag as leisure=swimming_pool Changeset #54498662
geodreieck4711 (2017-01-24 08:08:41+00:00): Ich verstehe nicht, warum hier Landuses übereinander geschlichtet werden, oder aneinandergrenzende überschnitten gezeichnet werden,
das sind schlichtweg Geometriefehler.
Inwieweit ist "Stadtplan Heilbronn" eine zulässige Quelle?????
DD1GJ (2017-01-24 08:33:26+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45415902

Wenn neben unzulässigen Quellen auch noch Geometriefehler hinzukommen, dann sollte alles zurückgesetzt werden. Einzelprüfung ist zu aufwändig.
Nakaner-repair (2017-01-24 16:07:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45440284 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets which copied data from &quot;Stadtplan Brackenheim&quot;, map2.hirsch-woelfl.de and &quot;Stadtplan Heilbronn&quot;. The data contains lots of errors and maybe even some easter eggs.
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:31:04+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
poornibadrinath (2017-01-25 06:30:27+00:00): Hi Walvox,
 I came across you edits and noticed you have deleted areas/forests and dragged nodes away from the original feature leading to distortions of the surrounding area polygons as well. Please be careful while editing and always validate to check if any feature is overlapping before uploading and also refrain from deleting features added by fellow mappers without a solid reason. 

Best,
Poornima Badrinath
praeteritum (2024-01-15 01:37:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146264504.
manoharuss (2017-01-24 06:05:20+00:00): Hi thatmoodieguy,

Welcome to OSM. Your interest in contributing to OSM is appreciated. But I have reverted your changeset because you have mapped overlapping footways, given natural=water tag to a building etc. Please make sure when you map, that you connect these footways to existing footways, see appropriate tags in the wiki(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features). When in doubt search for the feature tag in the wiki and you have a lot of help with pictures and examples. Thank you. Happy mapping.

Best,

Manohar
praeteritum (2024-01-15 01:19:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146264390.
praeteritum (2024-01-14 05:49:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146234206.
praeteritum (2024-01-14 05:28:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146233984.
oba510 (2017-01-26 12:24:43+00:00): Hi, I have reverted your two recent changesets.  Lowell is not a university. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool for more info. You also turned a house into a pier, and dragged a crosswalk several blocks over to another street (along with the road it was connected to).  I have re-added the new World Languages building you added.
praeteritum (2024-01-13 06:34:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146203899.
naoliv (2017-01-24 03:36:53+00:00): Monster bbox due to this stupid thing https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5507153
praeteritum (2024-01-13 06:19:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146203828.
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:31:09+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-24 18:01:40+00:00): Hi Kang Najib, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting so many well mappeg objects in this changeset? See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45419813
praeteritum (2024-01-12 13:43:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146181693.
carciofo (2017-03-13 14:16:28+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM! Thanks for your additions to Delray Beach. Please make sure to connect sidewalks to the road network at crossings so that they can be used for routing :) Happy mapping!
algot (2024-02-26 16:35:14+00:00): Hello

I noticed that you created a multi-polygon with grass tag in one neighborhood (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6905066).
What was the point of that? 

I just wondered why this area looks different than all other areas.
Undearius (2024-02-26 17:42:40+00:00): >What was the point of that?
This area is covered in grass. I hindsight, the appropriate tag would be surface=grass but this was from a time when I was new to OSM.

>why this area looks different than all other areas
I didn't want to commit to adding this level of detail to the entire city. I was using it like a personal testing ground for different tags and methods.
algot (2024-02-26 18:02:54+00:00): According to the wiki, this tag should be used for
"A tag for a smaller areas of mown and managed grass for example in the middle of a roundabout, verges beside a road or in the middle of a dual carriageway."

We should avoid using it for an entire neighborhood.
Would it be acceptable to remove the tag in order to achieve more uniform tagging in the area?
Undearius (2024-03-01 17:57:44+00:00): It's up to you, I have no strong feelings either way.
praeteritum (2024-01-12 13:36:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146181456.
nevw (2017-01-24 07:19:27+00:00): It is a public map. Please don't put people's names on the map.
Adhitya Dido (2017-01-24 07:20:48+00:00): I am sorry I just used this for learning purpose only. I will delete the information soon. Thank you :)
nevw (2017-01-24 07:24:51+00:00): That's ok. I have already deleted it.Tks
manoharuss (2017-01-24 07:09:38+00:00): Hi lferreyra,

Appreciate your mapping activity and contributions to OSM. But you did leave 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468219697 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468219698 untagged. It would be great if you can tag them and update. Your edits looks great otherwise.

Best,

Manohar
Warin61 (2017-05-02 02:51:28+00:00): Imagery can be used to add surfaces, structures.
Parks may not be easily detected from imagery unless you have additional information

The LPI Base Map has additional information .. particular regarding legal boundaries, parks etc.
j-wills (2017-02-14 06:40:59+00:00): Время работы?