piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2017-06-10 12:02:55+00:00): MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
hihiro (2017-06-14 09:23:50+00:00): GPSと既存の道路等を加味して、「Japan GSI ortho imagery」のトレースで道路を追加、それに関連する道路の修正をしています。
user_5359 (2017-06-10 15:54:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!

see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7284999
Commodoortje (2017-06-10 11:07:22+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-06-10 11:09:10+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik geprobeerd wat hulp te verlenen.
Hier kun je mijn aanpassingen zien.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49417886
gileri (2017-06-11 16:29:46+00:00): Bonjour,

Étonnant comme éditeur pour des arrêts de bus :p

Sinon, il faut penser au tag  source, et pour ce nœud il y a déjà le tag route_ref qui est présent.
nlehuby (2017-06-11 18:24:52+00:00): Bonjour Éric,

Le tag route_ref ne suffit pas, le tag note est surtout là pour signaler les relations `type = route` dans lesquelles cet arrêt de bus devrait se trouver (c'est pourquoi il ne reprend pas les lignes C2 et 70, qui s'arrête aussi à cet arrêt).

Noté pour le tag source (ici c'est survey).

L'éditeur utilisé est https://github.com/nlehuby/OSM_js_editor ;)

nlehuby
gileri (2017-06-11 20:13:47+00:00): Okay je viens de comprendre, en fait tu te sers du tag note comme to-do liste pour l'ajout aux type=route.

Je suis partagé sur l'utilisation de note pour ça (plus pour des commentaires permanents), alors que fixme est pour signaler un manque ou une erreur... À voir
nlehuby (2017-06-12 12:43:01+00:00): Oui, je suis d'accord pour dire que ce n'est pas très satisfaisant, mais comme la plupart des outils de contributions permettent difficilement d'ajouter proprement les arrêts aux relations pour le moment, c'est un bon compromis.

Au début, j'utilisais le tag "fixme:relation" pour marquer ce genre de choses, mais je me suis rendue compte que pas mal de contributeurs renseignaient déjà l'info dans des tags "note" ou "note;fr" ou "fixme" ou "FIXME" ou "route_ref" ou "line" ou "lines", "bus", "routes", "towards", etc
Bref, j'ai regardé quel était le tag le plus utilisé vers chez moi et je suis parti sur celui-ci plutôt que d'en créer encore un.
osmviborg (2017-06-10 11:43:29+00:00): Når du tagger som her, ser man ikke bynavnet på default kortet.  Det samme med Lystrup. Hvor smart er det?
Hjart (2017-06-10 15:35:56+00:00): Det er et problem med renderingen på standard visningen, ikke med vores data. Se f.eks. cykelkortet.
osmviborg (2017-06-10 16:43:22+00:00): Skærbæk ser du kun på et enkelt zoom trin, på cykelkortet. Et eller andet er ikke godt.
Hjart (2017-06-10 17:14:12+00:00): Jeg har kommenteret på https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/103. Håber der omsider sker noget.
Hjart (2017-06-10 17:20:24+00:00): Hvis man ser på https://danbolig.dk/bolig/toender/6780/villa/18925910001-189 (zoom henover Skærbæk) vil man kunne se at det sagtens kan lade sig gøre at rendere bynavnet fornuftigt selv om det er på en polygon
osmviborg (2017-06-10 18:20:41+00:00): Tiden løser alle problemer; måske.
Hjart (2017-06-10 18:23:01+00:00): Det kan man jo håbe på :-) Jeg er desværre ikke i besiddelse af de nødvendige evner til lige at løse dette problem.
hihiro (2017-06-14 09:23:32+00:00): GPSと既存の道路等を加味して、「Japan GSI ortho imagery」のトレースで道路を追加、それに関連する道路の修正をしています。
Sanniu (2017-06-14 05:19:02+00:00): Can you add also name:he tags for new roads?
Flayer (2017-06-14 08:16:44+00:00): Done
Sanniu (2017-06-14 10:28:23+00:00): Thanks!
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-14 10:56:16+00:00): Note that SwiftFast_bot adds name:he automatically. So it's not necessary anymore.
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-14 10:57:04+00:00): ...and I guess it's faster to work with one name tag.
oormilavinod (2017-06-12 04:40:01+00:00): Hey Arber9876 Welcome to OSM. nice see you contribution to the map. but i observed that the park is not properly traced according  to the imagery. please clarify with the imageries. Happy mapping!!
Arber9876 (2017-06-12 10:42:25+00:00): Hi . Now i read the comment. Skenderbej square has a new project and is rebuild changing the roads and park areas. The imageru is very old . Will send u photos taken in place to see the changes.
Arber9876 (2017-06-12 10:57:41+00:00): the link of photo take in place
https://www.google.com/maps/@41.326224,19.816635,3a,75y/data=!3m8!1e2!3m6!1s-CDUZpslovqg%2FWItej0yRAoI%2FAAAAAAAAAEs%2Fzm3YjJiTgF8q5iapoPeXreDSxQyZpZkNACLIB!2e4!3e12!6s%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2F-CDUZpslovqg%2FWItej0yRAoI%2FAAAAAAAAAEs%2Fzm3YjJiTgF8q5iapoPeXreDSxQyZpZkNACLIB%2Fw203-h114-k-no%2F!7i5312!8i2988
oormilavinod (2017-06-12 11:25:25+00:00): hey Arber9876 . great to know. thanks for replying . have a great time mapping :)
ma-rt-in (2017-06-11 06:03:12+00:00): laut description ein Bolzplatz, warum ist dann sport=soccer;basketball?
trigpoint (2017-06-12 15:19:05+00:00): Hi, this edit appears to have quite a bit of serious mistagging that could inconvienience other map users.
Travis Perkins is a builders merchant, not an outdoor shop.
Western Power Distribution is not an electronics shop, probably tag it as office=company, its not somewhere the public will normally visit.
It is unlikely that the Garden Centre is called Garden Centre, if it doesn't have a name leave it blank and it should be shop=garden_centre.
Please add phone numbers in full.
Thanks Phil
Russ McD (2017-06-12 16:04:17+00:00): Noted.. I was using that piece of shit Maps.me that offers only a limited range of tags.  Nothing for builders merchant, and OK the Garden centre does have the word Ramsey in from of it ... I'll add it.  I get round to amending these edits once back home on the PC, which I will do today. As a community, its time we outlawed edits from this App ! Rgds, Russ.
trigpoint (2017-06-12 16:43:19+00:00): Thanks Russ
hihiro (2017-06-14 09:23:11+00:00): GPSと既存の道路等を加味して、「Japan GSI ortho imagery」のトレースで道路を追加、それに関連する道路の修正をしています。
FredrikLindseth (2017-06-10 12:59:07+00:00): You should add office=yes (or something more descriptive) or perhaps shop= or tourism=attraction if the place is in attraction.
As it is now it is an address with a name and a website 😊
tuxicated (2017-06-10 13:31:18+00:00): Takk for tilbakemeldingen!  Foreløpig blir det kontor, endrer etter hvert.
ma-rt-in (2017-06-11 06:02:19+00:00): Hallo,

wie sind den die Öffnungszeiten für Feiertage?
user_3216889 (2017-06-10 16:26:09+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
user_3216889 (2017-06-10 16:32:09+00:00): Ik heb de zaak samengevoegd met al bestaand adrespunt voor nr. 7 (dat is gebruikelijk bij winkels) en bij telefoonnummer +31 voorgevoegd.
PeggyP (2017-06-10 19:09:19+00:00): Ok, bedankt!
Sébastien Este (2017-08-04 10:43:28+00:00): The bivouac Tailles is not a free camping site. This is a Bivouac site only authorized for hikers and cyclists. No Parking allowed. Can you modify the attribut? Thank you.
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 18:11:33+00:00): Revert changeset due to vandalism.
Zie forumtopic 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58795
user_5359 (2017-06-10 15:48:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your line.

If you need help: You are welcome!
Aleks-Berlin (2018-07-25 09:31:25+00:00): Hi mapper999, why do you create problem-keys ( k = "@Sammelmütze" ) ?

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/characters_in_keys#problem

Alex
Cascafico (2017-06-12 07:05:55+00:00): Hello,

your contibution is interesting, but the railway doesn't not exist anymore, even in abandoned status.
I'd leave train station, which building does exist.

I suggest you to download  railway you digitized, create a umap (umap.openstreetmap.fr) and delete it from OSM.
leveskockaa (2017-06-12 12:11:16+00:00): Hi,
I know that it's nowhere to be seen, but a couple years ago I travelled from Cividale to Caporetto, and I did not know there was a railway here. However, I spotted the cutting and the place of the old tracks from inside a car, which indicates that it's really not hard to see where the railway was.I also saw a couple of railway-looking buildings, and when I could do a Google search, my theory of an abandoned railway was confirmed. The OSM wiki says: "The course of a former railway which has been abandoned and the track and infrastucture removed. The course may be still recognized through embankments, cuttings, bridges, tunnel and rolling or straight ways." I think the course is way off, and I'd like to make it more accurate, but sadly I can't really do anything else than digitizing this old map. I think it belongs here because it isuseful information that can be found on the ground.
Cascafico (2017-06-12 12:38:22+00:00): Again: the polylline you digitized is interesting, but as a general OSM rule we've to be consistant to what we see on territory.

I took a look to some parts of way 499496031...   
- In Vernasso it is 100mt off (here is the real abandoned railway bridge 46.1224818, 13.4755004)
- in Cividale it cuts 10-15 houses  
-  in san pietro al Natisone idem   
- it cuts a 1400BC church

even Lidar scans thah we use to trace paths, doesn't show any embankment in Vernasso-Cividale area.

So if you want to keep the feature, please keep just segments you have surveyed.
leveskockaa (2017-06-12 19:05:59+00:00): I'm not sure what you mean by a 1400BC church, but I deleted the parts which were not based on any observation from the ground or from satellite imagery
Cascafico (2017-06-12 19:38:29+00:00): 1400AC sorry :-)

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36686129
user_3216889 (2017-06-10 16:26:52+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Hjart (2017-06-10 16:13:46+00:00): I'm sorry, that I'll have to revert this change, as it doesn't reflect current imagery. Please use our national imagery (geodatastyrelsen/SDFE), not Bing etc
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-23 08:23:13+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3571040 ?
Hjart (2017-06-10 16:02:39+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Øster Hæsinge Kirke var dog i forvejen markeret (se https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263546770) og derfor har jeg slettet din version.
Bemærk iøvrigt at det er bedst ikke at røre vores importerede addressenoder
mnitrmnitr (2023-05-08 13:19:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3477375
user_3022894 (2023-05-08 17:13:58+00:00): Hi,

thank you, I fixed it.
5m4u9 (2017-06-13 05:25:07+00:00): por favor, estos puntos como "peligrosos", se los entiende que son importantes visibilizarlo, pero aquí no es el mejor lugar.

peligro, podría suponer como proclive a deslizamiento, riada, inundación, etc. y no lo que quieres enfatizar.

sugiero utilizar la herramienta uMap (), para crear mapas con el fondo de OSM pero personalziados... con colores, imagenes, formas y textos en extenso.

cualquier duda de cómo usar uMap, hacerlo por aquí, o venir al hacklab cochabamba para aprender algún sábado.
5m4u9 (2017-06-13 05:25:03+00:00): por favor, estos puntos como "peligrosos", se los entiende que son importantes visibilizarlo, pero aquí no es el mejor lugar.

peligro, podría suponer como proclive a deslizamiento, riada, inundación, etc. y no lo que quieres enfatizar.

sugiero utilizar la herramienta uMap (), para crear mapas con el fondo de OSM pero personalziados... con colores, imagenes, formas y textos en extenso.

cualquier duda de cómo usar uMap, hacerlo por aquí, o venir al hacklab cochabamba para aprender algún sábado.
deierstoiner (2017-07-20 21:24:26+00:00): Hast du die im Bau befindlichen Gebäude an der Leipziger Chaussee gelöscht? Wenn ja, warum? Sie waren eindeutig als im Bau getaggt.
user_390227 (2017-07-21 05:43:15+00:00): Hallo deierstoiner,

ich habe mich aus folgenden Gründen entschlossen Deine Eintragungen in OSM zu löschen.

-Mit dem Bau des Gebäudes wurde noch nicht begonnen. Somit ist der Umring des Gebäudes nicht zu ersehen.
-Das Attribut building=proposed ist im JOSM und in der OSM Wiki nicht vorhanden.
-Das Attribut proposed =fence ist im JOSM und in der OSM Wiki nicht vorhanden.
-Durch das Attribut building=proposed war in der Kartenansicht ein Gebäude dargestellt, welches es nun mal nicht gibt.

Meiner Ansicht nach sollte in der OSM der Ist-Zustand dargestellt werden. Das Attribut proposed sollte nur für geplante oder im Bau befindliche Verkehrswege genutzt werden.

Da Openstreetmap aber ein Wiki ist, steht es Dir frei Deine Eintragungen wieder ins System einzupflegen.

Grüße

richtreiser
andygol (2017-06-10 20:04:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wheelmap

Срдіваюсь це вам допоможе впоратись з вашою метою.
5m4u9 (2017-06-13 05:23:33+00:00): revertido, porque se mueven elementos buenos y para peligro/violencia no hay forma de catalogarlos por ahora, se sugiere usar umap
luiswoo (2017-06-10 18:41:37+00:00): Почитайте, что есть тег name в вики и для чего он http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name?uselang=ru и что есть парк http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:leisure?uselang=ru Облагороженная растительность на дорожном разделителем сомнительна в качестве места досуга
Carnildo (2017-06-12 08:30:05+00:00): The "name" field should only be used for actual names, not descriptions.  For example, it's obvious that a walkway is a walkway because it's tagged as "highway=footway".
Alecs01 (2017-06-10 19:54:32+00:00): Hi, this was already on the map https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24037476 please don't duplicate existing objects, thanks
mueschel (2017-06-19 10:48:52+00:00): Hi,
I saw you added the tag "width:parking:lane:both" on several ways. This tag is not used in any other place up to now. In other places, the tag is "parking:lane:both:width". Could you change this to the common tag?

Cheers, Jan
btwhite92 (2017-06-21 04:13:55+00:00): Whoops, sorry about that. Should have it fixed tonight!
Bradley
Hjart (2017-06-10 19:15:44+00:00): Jeg spottede lige et par interessante stavefejl
cadsauxk (2017-06-11 14:14:56+00:00): Olá Colega, continuamos no aguardo URGENTE do seu contato conosco.
Por favor não se isole, converse conosco. Somos todos voluntários desejando a mesma coisa: mapas de qualidade.
Prosseguindo desta maneira você está apenas dando trabalho desnecessário para todos nós.
obrigado pela atenção
freebeer (2020-01-11 07:40:06+00:00): ciao,

please check what you have used for naming of the area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499539138 that is shown prominently on the map.

is there really signage using this name?  it reads to me as a generic description that can be inferred from its mapped location, and not something that should be in the name= field.

merci vielmal
Gumeg (2017-07-05 14:53:07+00:00): Бристоль находится внутри здания? или вы всё ж указали время работы самого Магнита?
Captain_Spork (2018-01-05 22:20:40+00:00): Hello Creator13,

I have restored the landuse of the park you mapped in this changeset.

See changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55199272

To map a park you should create a new polygon leisure=park and place it over the landuse as a blanket rather than amend the landuse and retag it to leisure=park.

Hope this makes sense :). If you have any questions please do not hesitate to ask.

Best regards,
Mark
cadsauxk (2017-06-11 14:14:42+00:00): Olá Colega, continuamos no aguardo URGENTE do seu contato conosco.
Por favor não se isole, converse conosco. Somos todos voluntários desejando a mesma coisa: mapas de qualidade.
Prosseguindo desta maneira você está apenas dando trabalho desnecessário para todos nós.
obrigado pela atenção
cadsauxk (2017-06-11 14:05:50+00:00): Olá Colega, continuamos no aguardo URGENTE do seu contato conosco. 

Por favor não se isole, converse conosco. Somos todos voluntários desejando a mesma coisa: mapas de qualidade. 

Prosseguindo desta maneira você está apenas dando trabalho desnecessário para todos nós.

obrigado pela atenção
DaveF (2017-06-10 22:12:09+00:00): Have you thought about mapping the actual fishing sites instead of the irrelevant 'access' notes?
maranman (2017-06-10 22:50:36+00:00): Not at all irrelevant if you are a member of the club who holds the right to fish that area!
You are so obviously not an angler and therefore have no experience of the innacurate car park locations issued by angling club volunteers. They try hard but often fail.
DaveF (2017-06-11 09:56:31+00:00): And you are obviously an inexperienced OSM mapper. It is not just for anglers information. Please read up on how to map accurately: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/6/how-do-i-get-started-with-openstreetmap
luiseih (2017-06-10 23:36:01+00:00): Please note these are TWO bus stops. One on each side of the road, and not precisely facing each other but slightly offset (see nodes for reference).
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-06-12 08:08:46+00:00): Super, takie pomyłki są dość irytujące :)
Nakaner (2018-10-10 08:59:52+00:00): Hallo Walter,

in dem gemeindefreien Gebiet gibt es derzeit überlappende AL8-Polygone, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2075151 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1022872

Es ist sowohl ein großes gemeindefreies Gebiet gemappt, das den gesamten Forst umfasst, als auch mehrere kleinere gemeindefreie Gebiete, die zusammen das große gemeindefreie Gebiet bilden.

Da du als letzter admin_level=8 an einem der beteiligten Polygon ergänzt hast, interessiert mich, warum du das getan hast.

Viele Grüße

Michael
wambacher (2018-10-10 11:38:25+00:00): Hi Michael, das ist über ein Jahr her.
Ich meine - auch wegen des CS-Kommentares - dass ich nur die AL8 gesetzt aber die Überlappung nicht bemerkt habe.

watt nu?

Gruss
walter
wambacher (2018-10-10 11:43:42+00:00): Ich glaube, dass die große Rel https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2075151 falsch ist, da die noch nicht einmal einen amtlichen Gemeindeschlüssel hat.
Werde das heute Abend zurücksetzen und dabei auf eventuelle Lücken achten.

Gruss
walter
wambacher (2018-10-11 10:36:59+00:00): Da dort nach der Änderung keine Lücke entstanden ist, hab ich das Teil jetzt endgültig gelöscht. Stiftet nur Verwirrung.
opendcc (2017-06-11 05:51:36+00:00): Hallo,

was ist das für ein Mast? Mobilfunk, Richtfunk, TV, Amatuerfunk? Höhe?
ke9tv (2018-05-03 23:17:12+00:00): I only just recently noticed this changeset - I'm only active on OSM somewhat sporadically,

I think the route relations got damaged by this change.  The Erie Canalway trail (Albany-Buffalo) appears to have been conflated with the Genesee Valley Greenway. I can assure you that the Mohawk-Hudson Bike Path in Albany and Schenectady Counties is nowhere near the Genesee Valley!

Since I don't know Rochester well, I'm not in a good position to fix it. Could I trouble you to have another look and figure out where the relations or names went astray?

I'll be happy to help fix if you have trouble with the data model - but I simply don't know what the situation in your part of the world should be.
utack (2017-07-01 14:13:43+00:00): Moin, 
Weißt Du ob die Brücke derzeit komplett unpassierbar ist, auch für Rad/Fuß?  
Und wie lange diese Baustelle wohl andauert?  
Vielen Dank
DHuthmann (2017-07-03 19:20:20+00:00): Hallo,
laut Bürgermeister wird nach einer Möglichkeit geucht dass Fußgänger über einen Steg geführt werden. Ich konnte mich bis jetzt aber noch nicht vor Ort überzeugen, ob das geklappt hat. Über die geplante Zeitdauer kann ich nichts sagen. Aufgrund meiner Erfahrungen, kann es aber passieren, dass die aktuelle Bausaison nicht ausreicht. Also etwa 5 Monate
Gruß,
Dirk
oormilavinod (2017-06-12 04:25:58+00:00): hey Slimane Ben Miled , welcome to OSM. i just observed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
nammala (2017-06-12 05:54:50+00:00): Hi Ahmed,

May I know the reason behind deleting the amenity theatre.

regards,
nammala
Hjart (2017-06-11 04:51:41+00:00): Please note that cycleway=* should not be used like this
MalteBerlin (2017-06-11 11:28:44+00:00): cycleway=sidepath sounds strange, but it should be alright, according to the wiki: 

"The value sidepath is used to indicate if a cycleway (or footway) is attendant to a street."

Please do not change - it helps bicycle routing engines to prefer paths slightly that are not near a main road.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dsidepath
Commodoortje (2017-06-11 08:58:45+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-06-11 09:01:03+00:00): Je hebt adresnode 30a gewijzigd naar 30, deze was reeds aanwezig in OSM.
Nu is nr 30 twee maal aanwezig en 30a is er niet meer.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2818718309
Daarom heb ik uw wijziging teruggedraaid.
Commodoortje (2017-06-11 09:01:19+00:00): MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
Maarten Boogert (2017-06-11 09:11:46+00:00): Ik huur Aan de Platz 30 !  (feitelijk nr. 30 en nr. 30a) 
Waar jullie 30a positioneren is 30 ! 
Ben tenslotte de locale kenner. 
N.B boven onze ingang stond al met koeienletters " Aan de Platz 30 " 

30 a bestaat niet meer 
Dus mijn correctie is wel in orde.
Bovendien valt me op dat Maps Me t.o.v. bijv. Google Maps steeds de juiste meest recente  aanpassingen geeft.
Commodoortje (2017-06-11 09:35:47+00:00): Maps.me maakt gebruik van de OSM database. Je zou ook eens de telefoon app osmand eens kunnen proberen.
Lokale kennis is inderdaad de meest betrouwbare bron. De huisnummers en panden zijn uit BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) geïmporteerd. Vandaar dat ik de opmerking maakte.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?searchQuery=aan%20de%20platz%2030a&resultOffset=0&objectId=0881200000613073&geometry.x=196488.20328125&geometry.y=331222.40515625&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0881010000613074
Ik ga de adresnode dan verplaatsen naar de door jou verkozen positie en haal 30a weg. 
Overigens is het geen verwijt. Omdat nieuwe mappers nog weleens beginnersfoutjes maken en MAPS.ME een zeer incomplete editor is, controleren we de nieuwe edits om "vervuiling"  te voorkomen en de nieuwe mappers wegwijs te maken met OpenStreetMap.
Commodoortje (2017-06-11 09:41:43+00:00): Ik zag dat je 30 al naar 30a had gewijzigd.
Inmiddels 2x nr 30 verwijdert.
fishcharlie (2019-07-16 22:14:27+00:00): Please keep updates productive and meaningful. Adding the tag "Courtyard Mariott Downtown=toilets" doesn't add any value to this node.
oormilavinod (2017-06-12 04:20:03+00:00): hey susana11 welcome to OSM !! nice to see you are adding to the map. i see that you have added a park with a node feature. but according to the OSM conventions we trace the park boundary. happy mapping!!
Klumbumbus (2019-02-14 21:59:21+00:00): Hallo,
lanes=0 auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165264459 Tippfehler?
VG
JochenB (2019-02-15 05:42:30+00:00): ja. Laut Josm-Fehlerprüfung ist das ja auch ein Fehler. Ich behme inmer die 1, wenn nicht durch Fahrbahnmarkierungen mehrere Fahrspuren erkenntlich sind.

Wobei in Diskussionen auch die Meinung vertreten wurde, das man bei einem Weg ohne Fahrspurmarkierung lanes=0 eintragen soll und nicht lanes=1.
Klumbumbus (2019-02-15 18:42:10+00:00): Hab lanes=0 an dieser Linie entfernt.
JochenB (2019-02-15 22:13:25+00:00): Danke, ich bin noch nicht dazu gekommen!
Grüße,
Jochen
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-06-12 14:28:43+00:00): Bom dia, bem vindo ao OpenStreetMAp. Percebi um erro nas suas edições: nessa área do residencial rio doce voce criou algumas vias mas umas ficaram desconectadas das outras, por exemplo este ponto https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4908264927/history