piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2020-11-09 12:22:24+00:00): Dag cd90,

Met deze changeset heb je 20 bus routerelaties ernstig beschadigd.
Als je zonder ervaring dergelijke ingewikkelde taken wilt uitvoeren, vraag dan even om hulp van ervaren mappers.
En als er routes lopen kun je het misschien beter overlaten aan de ervaren mappers.
Leo Slager (2020-11-09 12:51:28+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=4.49419&lat=52.15674&zoom=16&opacity=0.78&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes
eggie (2020-11-08 19:10:13+00:00): Niles.. Elk begin is moeilijk... maar diis echt niet correct. Maak een node ergens op de plek waar die boemist zit gewoon zonder adres en tag daar op shop=florist  name=,.....

We taggen niet op de gebouwomtrek zelf in OSM Nederland. . 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-08 21:55:49+00:00): Info verplaatst naar node
*Martin* (2021-01-15 18:46:42+00:00): nie, ten náučný chodník sa naozaj nevolá "Náučný chodník".
kalum88 (2021-01-15 18:58:02+00:00): To mi je jasné, že sa tento náučný chodník nevolá Náučný chodník. Z tabúľ som sa názov nedozvedel, ani som nič nevygooglil. Tie zvyšné tabule bol problém nájsť, lebo ten chodník vôbec nie je dobre označený. Iba som chcel, aby sa na mape zobrazil nejakou farbou a iní návštevníci nemuseli blúdiť a hľadať ako ja.
*Martin* (2021-01-15 19:48:56+00:00): ok, vdaka za info. na farbu staci tag colour a osmc:symbol.

https://www.freemap.sk/?map=15/48.784003/20.822291&layers=X
johsin18 (2021-11-25 20:27:49+00:00): Das Gebäude gibt es schon noch.  Hat nur ein Gründach und ist in den Hang hinein gebaut.
Frans S (2020-11-09 11:01:09+00:00): Hello Ethbut. I've send you a PM about mapping here.
I have to revert your mappings here because it cost more time to correct them, rather than mapping again from scratch. Sorry for the time you spend in this task.
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93753933
ququruzka (2020-11-10 17:10:37+00:00): пиши нормальные комментарии к изменениям.
osmdees (2022-08-21 16:18:49+00:00): Hi, warst du vor 2 Jahren vor Ort an der "Lindentalhütte"? Ein Wegweiser 3,5km und einer 2,5km entfernt weisen auf eine "Lindentälehütte" hin.
osmdees (2022-08-21 16:19:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338885306
user_18305684 (2023-07-20 15:07:40+00:00): Hi,

about the node 8094626343, the tag rock_shelter is a little used tag : https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/natural=rock_shelter

I would like to know if the tag natural=cave_entrance or maybe natural=arch could fit to this node ?Like that it will be more "visible" for mappers and softwares using osm datas.

Best regards
Bąbel (2020-11-12 08:27:25+00:00): Napotkałem wymuszony objazd przez Łubiana, a ty sugerujesz przejazd po jednym pasie. 
Były dwie MIJANKI w dalszej drodze przez las.
Co jest prawdą.
xych (2020-11-12 11:37:52+00:00): Przejeżdżałem ten odcinek w obie strony w niedzielę i wczoraj. Droga jest przejezdna po jednym pasie. Przejazd jest sterowny światłami. Z uwagi na poważny zakres robót, nie można wykluczyć, że wcześniej przez pewien czas nie było przejazdu.
ququruzka (2020-11-10 17:10:32+00:00): пиши нормальные комментарии к изменениям.
Dino Michelini (2021-02-10 17:12:09+00:00): Hi, the changes made on the routes of the Via Franciegna are not correct. The routes you canceled were right. Please correct with a revert. Otherwise I will have to report it to the DWG.
StC (2021-02-10 17:30:10+00:00): Hi, pleased to meet you too!
When I look at this changeset in the history viewer, I only find a change in two tags (which may be disputed, I admit). More generally, I have no memory of deleting any routes on Via Francigena, rather of recreating a superroute that had been deleted a few years earlier. Maybe if you were more precise in your questions instead of resorting to threats about a three month old changeset...
Dino Michelini (2021-02-10 17:55:50+00:00): sono spariti il website, i riferimenti a wikidata e wikipedia per ogni singola nazione, i name:en name:fr name:it e i relativi symbol, i dati su distance, ascent, descent, ele:max e ele:min. Il tag pilgrimage non è corretto. Il name per ogni route nazionale è stato modificato senza tenere uno standard.
StC (2021-02-10 18:03:40+00:00): Sur le pilgrimage, c'est vrai : je suis reparti de ce que j'avais vu sur d'autres itinéraires, j'ai eu tort.
Sur le reste, je n'en vois aucune trace dans le changeset et je n'ai aucun souvenir d'y avoir touché. Il faut chercher ailleurs, je pense.

Ce que je pense, en réalité, c'est que vous m'accusez d'avoir détruit la superroute qui avait disparu depuis plusieurs années, et que j'ai recréée. Désolé si je ne l'ai pas fait aussi bien que vous l'auriez fait !
eggie (2020-11-08 21:32:36+00:00): Top!
AntMadeira (2020-11-09 20:01:36+00:00): Olá, e_barreira.
Espero vir encontrar-te bem.

Tenho reparado que tens editado zonas supermercados, e gostaria de sugerir duas mudanças na tua abordagem:
1. as áreas não devem sobrepôr-se às estradas. No OSM, a linha de uma estrada representa o seu eixo, por isso, não faz sentido sobrepores a área comercial à estrada.
2. a etiqueta para a área comercial não é landuse=commercial, mas sim landuse=retail. A primeira é usada para áreas empresariais. Podes consultar a sua descrição aqui:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial


Qualquer dúvida, estou ao dispor.

Cumprimentos,
António.
eggie (2020-11-08 21:35:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

review..  Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM.. Maak altijd een combinatie ,met bv shop=????? Zie wiki

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-11-08 21:47:30+00:00): Shop-tag en website toegevoegd
Frans S (2020-11-09 09:40:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93755366
dgitto (2020-11-09 06:23:45+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
zhoogle (2021-07-01 19:13:34+00:00): дорога 824266818 была удалена напрасно. Это новая дорога к объекту по обращению с отходами, была отрисована по космоснимку Landsat8. На космоснимке Bing ее не видно, поскольку он сильно устаревший. Можно увидеть частично на космоснимке известного сервиса на букву Я.
zhoogle (2021-07-01 20:51:49+00:00): отрисовал заново https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107279319
IgorKurochkin (2021-07-01 21:07:16+00:00): ок
ququruzka (2020-11-10 17:10:28+00:00): пиши нормальные комментарии к изменениям.
Woazboat (2020-11-12 12:59:27+00:00): Beim Bearbeiten ist da glaub ich eine falsche Node als platform in die route relations reingerutscht

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8094727661 (ist Teil der neu hinzugefügten barrier=wall)

lg
Woazboat (2020-11-12 13:02:51+00:00): Diese (falsche) platform Node ist aber komischerweise in der richtigen Reihenfolge in der Relation eingetragen. Vielleicht war das der Grund warum das Hinzufügen der richtigen platform im späteren Changeset nicht richtig funktioniert hat. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93757957#map=19/47.07943/15.46861
micheleOSM3 (2021-04-07 07:01:23+00:00): E' un sentiero CAI esistente?
XYXabc (2021-04-09 07:59:18+00:00): Il sentiero denominato "Portatrici Carniche" è identificato dai numeri CAI 402a e 402. L'ho percorso l'8.11.2020 dal bivio con la Via Julia Augusta alla Casera Pal Grande di Sopra ed era in buone condizioni, a parte un paio di punti all'inizio, dove alcuni alberi caduti a causa della tempesta Vaia costringono a qualche attenzione supplementare.
micheleOSM3 (2021-04-09 08:10:29+00:00): Il mio commento era riferito al sentiero 400: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2458960
non avendo risposta l'ho cancellato.
XYXabc (2021-04-09 10:44:11+00:00): Ah, OK. Non mi risulta nessun sentiero CAI numero 400 in zona.
Per maggiori info https://www.cai-fvg.it/sentieri-cai-fvg/settore-4-alpi-carniche/ (non aggiornatissimo in verità) oppure contattare il sig. Lauro Spangaro della Sezione CAI di Ravascletto.
Fabrizio Tatti (2022-12-12 11:50:21+00:00): Ciao Andrea, questa non può essere considerata una grotta, ho corretto e indicato come arco.
MrAndrea (2022-12-12 15:02:25+00:00): Ciao Fabrizio, va bene grazie.
Puxan (2020-11-09 12:51:09+00:00): @lucindesky   Buen trabajo. Recuerda que las vías que comunican con los campos se etiquetan como "pista".      
Muy bien, sigue mapeando.    
Joaquim
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93756535
eggie (2020-11-08 23:49:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
aachso (2020-11-08 23:15:46+00:00): Hello pe1aqp, thanks for your edit!

Could you please add oneway=no instead of removing oneway=yes? Otherwise future mappers might think it's a mistake.

Also, could you extend the bi-directional path so it connects to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33424605, allowing bicycle riders from Kandelfeldstraße to turn left onto the cycle track?

According to Mapillary photos from 2019, the sign at the Reutershag bus stop is this one (https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/img/1022-10.png). If that's still the case, please add traffic_sign:backward=DE:1022-10

The end of the bi-directional cycle way is correct, but now the last part is technically a dead-end because the crossing has been placed at the wrong spot in the past (by someone else, not by you). Can you move https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233025742 ~15 meters west and turn it into an unmarked crossing that connects the two cycle tracks?

If that's too complicated or if you need any assistance, please let me know!
joost schouppe (2020-11-09 08:47:00+00:00): Hi Diego,
Paths that are private can be still present in OSM, but we add an access=private tag on them. That way, maps can show them as inaccessible, and routers won't send hikers there.

It is better than deleting them, otherwise they will probably appear again, perhaps without these access=private tags.

I have reverted your edit. There were one or two paths that were NOT marked as private; I'll add that info to the map.

Best,
Joost
joost schouppe (2020-11-09 09:01:56+00:00): Hi again,
Having reviewed the info at https://www.balnam.be/rhisnes/sentier/49 , I'm not convinced that the path crossing the domain is in fact private. Maybe this can be confirmed by the municipality?
WoodWoseWulf (2020-11-09 00:00:35+00:00): Hi Quach,

Welcome to OSM!

Your "fishing path" currently runs through the water - is this correct?

Please also note that the name tag should only be used for real names of things, not descriptions. It's 100% ok to leave the name tag blank.
Svalbard (2020-11-15 18:25:55+00:00): Hallo Jet_115, warum hast Du das mit seinen einzelnen Gebäudeteilen eingezeichnete Haus der Jugend gelöscht und deutlich ungenauer neu eingezeichnet? Bitte stelle den Ausgangszustand wieder her. Gruß Svalbard
aachso (2020-11-09 02:55:50+00:00): Hello,

this is almost correct, it should be "track" instead of "lane" (as it's separate from the road).
Woazboat (2020-11-12 11:11:19+00:00): Hallo,

Bitte achte beim Verändern von Busrouten und beim Hinzufügen von neuen Haltestellen darauf, dass diese in der Relation in der richtigen Reihenfolge eingetragen sind. Platforms/stops müssen vor den Straßen sein und wenn möglich in der angefahrenen Rehenfolge geordnet sein.
(Ich habe diese Route vor ein paar Tagen repariert, jetzt ist sie wieder kaputt.)

lg,
Woazboat

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=11.56600&lat=48.13900&zoom=10&overlays=ptv2_routes_,ptv2_routes_valid,ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes
thopf (2020-11-12 12:25:15+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!

Die Reihenfolge der Relationen kann man im iD-Editor leider nicht ordnen. Was die Fehlermeldung bei der Buslinie N7 an den Steigen F und G betrifft, kann es sein, dass diese darauf zurückzuführen ist, dass der Bus in Richtung Stifting (von der Innenstadt kommend und von Ragnitz kommend) die Haltestelle 2x anfährt. Hier wird diese Möglichkeit erwähnt: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4978#issuecomment-380117483

LG.
Woazboat (2020-11-12 12:45:37+00:00): Hmmm, iD ist glaube ich nur bedingt dafür geeignet so komplizierte Routen zu bearbeiten. JOSM funktioniert da ziemlich gut. 
Ich habs auf jeden Fall wieder gerichtet.

lg
Woazboat (2020-11-12 12:53:00+00:00): Die Linie 58 fährt die Haltestelle Sankt Leonhard/Klinikum Mitte nur einmal an und ist auch kaputt geworden (platform in der falschen Reihenfolge ganz unten eingeordnet). Es liegt also vermutlich nicht (nur) an dem verlinktem Github issue
Woazboat (2020-11-12 13:08:34+00:00): Ach ja, wenn möglich bitte auch gleich die richtige role (platform/stop) für die Einträge in der stop_area Relation setzen ;)

lg
thopf (2020-11-12 13:46:46+00:00): Ich habe gleich die Linie 41 auch verbessert, da dort dieselbe Fehlermeldung kam. Ich bin draufgekommen, dass man im iD-Editor doch die Reihenfolge der Member der Relation verändern kann. Geht aber nur in der Linienrelation. 

LG.
blackboxlogic (2020-11-15 20:22:15+00:00): Thanks for cleaning these up. building=commercial was an artifact from my import process (so there may be a lot more of that).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93758098
praeteritum (2023-07-24 01:39:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138915627.
mapper999 (2020-11-09 06:39:44+00:00): Warum nicht building=storage_tank und man_made=storage_tank?
Radbubi (2020-11-09 14:34:50+00:00): Weil das ein wenig doppelt gemoppelt ist. Aber ich werde das ergänzen. Scheint für noch genutzte Speichertanks besser zu sein.
Radbubi (2020-11-09 14:53:52+00:00): Ergänzung: ja, beide Tags in Kombination erscheinen sinnvoller. Werde es spätestens morgen Abend ergänzen.
LucGommans (2020-11-08 22:24:00+00:00): Looks good, thanks for the contribution! :)
aceman444 (2022-02-28 08:08:56+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za snahu. Cesty su celkom dobre, ale budovy ste posunuli nespravne, vobec na Ortotofoto mozaiku nesedia. Vyzera, ze ste umiestnovali podla striech, ale ma to byt podla zakladne (podorysu). Tu su snimky robene dost zboku (je vidiet severnu stranu budov), takze tieto dva pohlady su dost rozdielne.
Zial v tejto obci je vela budov dost uletenych, od predchadzajucich autorov.
Najlepsie je si podlozit katastralnu mapu, ktora tie podorysy zobrazuje.

A parkovisko pri Dome dochodcov uz existovalo, vytvorili ste ho duplicitne. Ked ste ho vytvorili ako plochu to je dobre, ale mali ste prevziat znacky toho povodneho bodu a bod vymazat.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-07 00:59:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110823595 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, and a discussion with the user, reverting some changesets that used Google as a source.
◪ Jarv (2020-11-08 22:40:08+00:00): Dude, I actually just corrected all of these junctions today. Please stop adding banned and mandatory turns where they do not exist. I have recent camera footage of all of these junctions, and there are only five restrictions in this edit area. Just because a dual carriageway ends doesn't mean there is a u-turn ban. Please revert or I'll have to fix it, once again.
Nathan_A_RF (2020-11-09 05:00:54+00:00): The banned turn is implied; a u-turn at these locations would be dangerous and should not be recommended at all when using directions. If you think otherwise, correct these turns - do not revert the entire changelog
◪ Jarv (2020-11-09 09:48:07+00:00): I do think otherwise, and have removed the banned turns that are not signposted, or shown by traffic signals.
In the majority of cases the turns are very possible to do, and safely even in a long vehicle.
SomeoneElse (2020-11-10 11:23:16+00:00): @Nathan_A_RF
Hello, Andy from the Data Working Group here.
With regard to "do not revert the entire changelog" it is not OK to make a lot of changes, most of which are not OK, and ask another user to "correct these turns" after they have recently edited in the area.
For the avoidance of doubt, just because "a u-turn at these locations would be dangerous and should not be recommended" is not a reason to add a legal restriction to OSM where none exists in the real world.
Can I ask you what your familiarity with Lincoln is?
Best Regards,
Andy
carciofo (2022-07-10 11:26:27+00:00): Hi, just curious as to the source for applying the ref=40 to the segment between Buga and La Paila in this changeset? This segment actually is defined as National Hwy 25. Hwy 40 is discontinuous here.
BigKev97 (2022-12-03 15:52:24+00:00): I think is the missing link of the numbered highway.
JJIglesias (2020-11-09 02:49:41+00:00): Las construcciones debes ortogonalizarlas, para eso se usa el atajo S o sino tocas el boton derecho del mouse y las figuras se cuadriculan correctamente. Ademas si vas a hacer edificaciones debes usar la imagen de fondo mas reciente (Maxar) porque estas inventado edificaciones inexistentes y tendremos q borrarlas.
Gracias
Carnildo (2020-11-10 07:43:10+00:00): As far as I can tell, the "car wash" you added is a defunct car wash with a building still prominently labeled "Car Wash" with an equally prominent "Car Wash" sign out front.
user_115918 (2020-11-10 17:52:02+00:00): Thanks for making the update
aachso (2020-11-09 01:49:01+00:00): Hallo,

zu welchem Zweck werden denn hier Nummernschilder erfasst? Der Key "enforcement" (dt. "Durchsetzung") scheint hier nicht richtig, da die Nummernschilderfassung nur das Mittel zum Durchsetzen des Ziels ist aber nicht selbst das Ziel ist.

Vermutlich ist surveillance:type=ALPR passender?

Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surveillance:type

Zur Erfassung von Verkehrsflüssen mit Nummernschilderfassung habe ich noch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mappa_Mercia/UTC gefunden ("ANPR")
aachso (2020-11-09 02:03:45+00:00): Ach, habe jetzt erst bemerkt, dass du das bei den Kameras schon so gemacht hast.

Es gab mal dieses nicht weiter verfolgte Proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Surveillance

Wenn die Überwachung das Ziel ist, könnte ich mir aber auch enforcement=surveillance ganz gut vorstellen. Was hältst du davon?
x a (2020-11-09 14:18:07+00:00): Danke für die Anregungen.
Ja, die Geräte selbst sind surveillance:type=ALPR. Zweck der Anlage an der Stelle ist die Grenzüberwachung/"Kriminalitätsbekämpfung".
→ https://brf.be/regional/1049771/
Unmittelbar "enforcen" sie also einerseits nichts; andererseits ist dieses from/to/device Relatonskonstrukt jedoch etabliert für Verkehrsüberwachungsanlagen – die Analogie ist offenkundig.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93759540
aachso (2020-11-09 14:28:15+00:00): Ja, in diesem Fall finde ich das vorgeschlagene enforcement=surveillance (statt enforcement=ALPR) auf den Relationen sinnvoll. Damit lassen sich dann auch andere, ähnliche Überwachungsmethoden wie z.B. Kameraüberwachung mappen.
trial (2022-03-25 21:01:22+00:00): Je me suis permis d'homogénéiser les PFG avec ce que propose iD et ce que vous aviez indiqué dans les versions précédentes.
Reinhard12 (2020-11-09 21:41:08+00:00): Hallo, war das so beabsichtigt?
Es wird hier
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=807863#p807863
diskutiert.
DD1GJ (2020-11-09 22:58:40+00:00): Vandalismus zurückgesetzt, "Allgäu-Airport" war unglaubwürdig
WoodWoseWulf (2020-11-09 00:03:59+00:00): Hi Megan,

Please check the errors that iD presents you with before uploading. OSM is a live map so any edits you make are accessible to everyone.

This changeset has 14 errors for crossing highways.

Some of the paths you added intersected other existing paths, buildings and roads, and don't seem to relate to what is on the ground
Frans S (2020-11-09 09:39:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
The mappings themselves are rather accurate but needs to be improved.
some issues.
do not map the sidings of a building as part of a building. Move the mapped roof to the groundplan.
Please be more accurate in following the outlines , do not map courtyard as part of a building.
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93760271
JesseFTW (2020-11-10 01:21:28+00:00): This broke the coastline for all of North & South America (by causing it to cross in Northwest Cove by Bayside). This was fixed in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93798791

Please be careful about this sort of thing. Thanks!
Hugoren Martinako (2022-08-29 15:45:52+00:00): Arratsalde on,

Be extremely careful when you draw paths from GPS traces, mainly in forests where the imagery is not fully helpful. A single trace can have some offset, odd points, or even worst, that people have uploaded cross-country, dangerous traces.

I had to remove some inexistent paths of the Errekaidorrako bidea (Iratiko oihana) because there no way to use them in any case.

Agur bat
mueschel (2020-11-13 09:51:16+00:00): Hi,
you used two tags here that are not used in any other place. Please explain what they mean:

  santa-fe-chamber-of-commerce = santa-fe-community-profile
  santa-fe-community-profile = 2020-addendum
Rico557 (2020-11-09 12:54:58+00:00): Здание по Поповича 50 (МУПК) содержит больше чем три этажа. Гляньте панорамы яндекса со стороны Гонионской
4004 (2020-11-09 13:47:05+00:00): 5? там надо через партс пожалуй.
я так и не понял, что там за основная контора нынче
Rico557 (2020-11-12 13:04:46+00:00): Давно там не был, сколько этажей не скажу. По некоторым источникам основная контора там - администрация гродненского городского центра культуры.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-11-09 08:41:00+00:00): Ciao. L'etichettatura che usi per i sentieri/percorsi mtb è errata. Vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking. In particolare, mtb=yes è errato perché in Italia non c'è distinzione tra mtb e bici dal punto di vista dell'accesso. Inoltre, nel caso di sentieri devi usare il tag mtb:name. Nei percorsi devi fare una relazione con type=route + route=mtb ed etichettarla opportunamente. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93760773
Mtb Explorer 360 (2020-11-09 16:51:43+00:00): ciao,
ti ringrazio per le info.
Ho fatto come hai detto tu ma in questo caso, utilizzando il tag mtb:name non vengono visualizzati i nomi dei percorsi..ma solo utilizzando il tag name.
Usando type e route non ho notato differenze rispetto a prima.
Quello che mi interessava era avere i nomi sui vari percorsi, cosa che posso ottenere solamente mettendo entrambi i tag: mtb:name e name.
Se hai suggerimenti in proposito ti ascolto!
grazie
Daniele