piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Himké (2019-08-18 23:21:15+00:00): Highway 400A is no longer used as the designation became obsolete when Highway 11 was rerouted from Penetanguishene Road to begin at Highway 400 instead.
MKnight (2019-08-19 08:50:00+00:00): Moin,
Du hast an dem "Chinaparkplatz" amenity=parking durch area=yes ersetzt, warum?
scandy (2019-08-19 19:52:32+00:00): Moin,
war ein Versehen, was ich beim speichern übersehen hatte. Wollte an dem Objekt nichts ändern.
Hjart (2019-08-19 04:36:10+00:00): Bemærk at "vildfarne" adresser automatisk bliver rettet tilbage af vores bot. Er der fejl i sådanne nogle bør de i stedet meldes til kommunen, som så kan ændre i den officielle database.
Polarbear-repair (2020-04-30 23:20:02+00:00): Hi ClarkstonCorrect, could you please tell us what map you have warped in mapwarper? 

Mapwarper is a tool for rectifying imagery, so we need to know if using the map or image itself is allowed for OpenStreetMap?
Takogin (2019-08-22 11:42:58+00:00): Hi! I noticed that you added tag 'footway' to the polygons with landuse/building tags, it is an incorrect mapping, so if you want to take part in OSM mapping could you please take a look in OSM mapping rules here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
If you want to add footway, please do it using separate line, not an existing polygon of another objects. 

Best regards,
Tatsiana Koval
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73475614
Andreso Costa (2019-08-22 11:49:06+00:00): thanks for the tip
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73475614
alphensebezorger (2019-08-20 22:17:44+00:00): Hello N50,

I found two newly created islands in this changeset with intersected with the existing coastline: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668105192. Since the new shapes were identical to two islands nearby, I guess you duplicated these unintentionally. After checking aerial imagery I took the liberty to delete these new islands. in order to create a coastline which makes sense.
If you feel my deletion is unwanted, please let me know. I'd be happy to revert my changes (set 73557192), so you can repair the coastline yourself.
Happy mapping, Alphensebezorger.
viloan (2019-08-19 00:20:15+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
santamariense (2019-08-19 02:25:43+00:00): Este "teste" condiz com a realidade do local?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73475897
mcld (2019-08-24 00:29:23+00:00): Hi - are you confident that this solar farm you've mapped as "Hadley" repd 1990 is indeed the right one? To me it looks quite likely to be "Twemlows" repd 4861, which has the right location and is described as "land on runway at Twemlows"
adventure1 (2019-08-25 22:49:55+00:00): Yes, my mistake.  Thanks for the heads up!
mcld (2019-08-26 11:40:15+00:00): OK great. Thanks!
viloan (2019-08-19 01:14:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Skippern (2019-08-20 18:24:39+00:00): pode adicionar o tag shop=pharmacy ou shop=chemist tambem, para aplicativos saber que ha tem farmácia.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73476351
user_5359 (2019-08-19 03:55:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
viloan (2019-08-19 01:31:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
snitch (2019-08-19 21:42:27+00:00): This is incorrect – why are you doing this?
mavl (2019-08-19 16:15:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника были взяты адресные данные?
iWowik (2019-11-23 16:36:33+00:00): Здравствуйте, storm_shadow!
К сожалению вы не ответили ни на комментарий к этому пакету правок, ни к https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73476804
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о комментариях, поэтому повторю вопрос, который меня тоже интересует
Откуда вы берете адресную информацию?
iWowik (2019-10-14 10:16:43+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, а также вносите адресную информацию.
Обычно ее сложно найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы ее берете?
viloan (2019-08-19 03:02:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kucai (2019-08-25 11:16:01+00:00): ni daripada google jugak ke?
Warin61 (2019-08-20 07:49:16+00:00): Hi,

The OSM 'railway station' encompass not only the building but the platforms and tracks ... and probably the signal box.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation
frddunc (2019-08-22 03:29:20+00:00): Signal box is a separate entity in this case which is not included as part of the station in all operational plans and advice from the railway track operator
RedGel (2019-08-19 20:02:12+00:00): Hello, I have reverted a change that was made to way 80211517 and adjusted the footpath as to not overlap the service road in changeset 73513432.
eggie (2019-08-19 06:40:08+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de officiële adresnode.
MVG,
Eggie
dpolovinkin (2025-04-09 08:45:35+00:00): уже старое изменение, но то что вы добавили не просто точки с адресами, а несуществующую геометрию зданий что вообще нельзя делать - в конце концов надо будет кому то чинить...
eggie (2019-08-19 06:31:57+00:00): Dag Alice.. Je bedoeling is ongetwijfeld goed, maar de maar name:nl=NED is niet correct.
name:nl =  wordt buiten Nederland en in Friesland gebruikt. 
Ik pas wat aan en zal de info naar de adresnode verplaatsen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-19 07:50:14+00:00): Volgens mijn info maandag gesloten. Kijk je nog even?
archie (2019-08-19 07:07:07+00:00): Du, access=yes är default-värde. Du behöver inte tagga detta extra.
PT-53 (2019-08-19 15:45:15+00:00): Hallo FvGordon,
ich hatte den Verursacher per CS-Kommentar über seinen "Fehler" informiert, damit er seinen Fehler selbst ausbessert und dadurch dazu lernt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73145079
Du hast jetzt die Überschneidung behoben. Nur daß das Gebäude-Teil jetzt immer noch 2 Gebäude umfaßt. Das ist doch falsch, oder?
Grüße
FvGordon (2019-08-19 17:14:42+00:00): Am "building innerhalb building:part" habe ich in diesem CS wenig geändert. Meine Aktion war nur, die beiden gruppierenden Gebäudeumrisse w715283661 und w621194837, zu teilen, die vorher ein Gebäude waren (verbunden über einen selbst überschneidenden Steg von 2,6 m Länge und einer Breite von Null östlich am süd-östlichsten Knoten von w715283661 angebunden). So wurden aus 4 building innerhalb einem building:part 2x 2 building innerhalb 2 building:part. Direkt südlich anschließend befinden sich noch 3 weitere building innerhalb einem building:part.
PT-53 (2019-08-25 12:14:25+00:00): Hallo FvGordon, 
nachdem jo2812 - wiedereinmal - nicht ragiert hat, habe ich heute die falschen Gebäude-Teile gelöscht.
Grüße
evod (2019-10-01 12:52:34+00:00): Servus!

danke für deine Arbeit an OSM, mir ist allerdings bei deinen Beiträgen ein Thema aufgefallen:

meiner Meinung nach ist es keine gute Idee für temporäre Baustellen aus existierenden Straßen highway=construction zu machen. Das OSM Wiki meint dazu auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction 

------ Zitat Anfang ------
Bezüglich des Tagging von vorher existierenden Features, die wegen Erweiterung oder Reparatur gesperrt werden: Viele Datennutzer (insbesondere Tileserver Dritter, gedruckte Karten und Smartphones/Navis, die Daten offline vorhalten) aktualisieren nur alle paar Wochen oder Monate ihre Daten.
Daher sollten Sperrungen insbesondere von Straßen und Schienen unter sechs (manche Mapper meinen neun) Monate nicht als *=construction getaggt werden. Stattdessen sollte das Taggingschema Conditional Restrictions oder ein spezielles Schema für das Taggen temporärer Veränderungen verwendet werden, auch wenn es nicht von allen Routern unterstützt wird.
------ Zitat Ende ------

Bitte passe die von dir "deaktivierten" Straßen dementsprechend an - bzw. können wir auch gern das Thema im OSM Forum oder auf der Mailingliste ansprechen, aber ich denke der bisherige Konsens ist im Wiki gut festgehalten.

Viele Grüße und viel Spaß beim Mappen,
Markus
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-08-19 06:44:51+00:00):  Greece: added destination=ευαγγελισμός χώρου ανάπαυσης;tagged motorway_junction
Carto'Cité (2019-08-29 08:44:28+00:00): Bonjour.

La voie https://www.osm.org/way/602017494 est-elle vraiment une piste cyclable, réservée aux cyclistes, ou une voie verte partagée entre piétons et cyclistes ? La présence du tag traffic_sign=FR:C115 indique la présence du panneau Voie verte, et l'ortho-photo montre les pictos vélos et piétons. Est-ce que ce n'est plus le cas sur le terrain ?

Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto'Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
BCNorwich (2019-08-29 08:56:06+00:00): I don't know, I removed the duplicated section of the cycleway keeping all the tags on the remaining cycleway.
Cyclono (2019-08-19 11:10:37+00:00): Eindelijk, na 2 jaar! 

Wohoo!
lavanya1 (2019-09-03 08:38:12+00:00): "Hi Fadlilaa IRM-ED,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 715290860 is been 'Hanging Segment'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, we can't retain the data as same.

As of now we are deleting data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-09-03 09:03:14+00:00): Hi lavanya1,

You are correct to delete it, but it will better to connect that way from node/5521767306. Please check using Maxar Standard.

Thank you & happy mapping!
yumean1119 (2019-08-23 09:17:23+00:00): はじめまして。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/
のサーバーは全世界の方が利用されるものですので、個人的なメモや、架空の事象をマッピングしないようにお願いいたします。
nevw (2019-08-19 09:57:43+00:00): Hi,
I reverted your business addition to the OpenStreetMap for some of the reasons listed on our wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

Adding a name and all other info in a description tag is not suitable, please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 to initially help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags.
hackthemap (2020-06-22 13:25:47+00:00): If https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1511863133/history is not usable the amenity=drinking_water should be prefixed with was: or removed:, too?
Tord Bern Hansen (2020-08-02 13:57:38+00:00): Syklet gjennom noen veier og stier i hytteområdet på Nordseter. Ser at du har gjort en grundig jobb med veiklassifisering. Har endret øverste delen av Nevelfaret fra Unclassified til Service da den ikke er en viktig vei i hytteområdet og ikke gjennomgående. Den ser muligens gjennomgående ut, men er det ikke, og er ikke kjørbar grunnet en bru som ligger 50 cm høyere enn veien. .
pitscheplatsch (2019-08-19 17:44:49+00:00): Hi Cleo Dionne, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong here. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237334181

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
flohoff (2019-09-24 18:13:28+00:00): Moin,
ich habe hier die Fläche von dem ex Umspanner mal aus dem landuse=meadow ausgenommen. Da ist ja keine Wiese. Ausserdem habe ich den seperaten way mit dem fence entfernt - die ganze Weide ist ja eingezäunt und habe auf den landuse=meadow ein barrier=fence gelegt.

Kannst du dir ja nochmal ansehen.

Flo
flohoff (2019-09-24 18:14:50+00:00): Ach ja - und weil es mir just noch aufgefallen ist.

Das "Artenschutzturm Rheda-Wiedenbrück OT Marburg" ist auch kein wirklicher Name - Das ist eher eine Beschreibung.

Ich habe das mal von name -> description verschoben.

Flo
Tomas_J (2025-01-10 14:34:16+00:00): Hi, you forgot to tag this line which you created (see below). I should be probably an intermitent stream...? I am also not sure if it is correct to tie the line with the state border.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/715330052#map=15/34.11585/73.92750
Warin61 (2019-08-20 08:04:39+00:00): Hi,
This has problems!

First .. it does not need to be a multipolygon, not complex enough. 

The single outer way for the building should have the tags of the relation .. it is the entire building. 

The building:part=yes might be tagged building:part=retail? 

Apart from that .. very nice!
Pierce (2019-08-21 10:25:43+00:00): Going by the wiki it's suggested that you do not put anything on any relationship members if they are common across all members, then you put it on the relation. So all children inherit the properties.

The 'multipolygon' type I wasn't certain about, I guess the alternative would be 'building'?

I'll go ahead and fix the 'building:part=retail' tags, you're right, I was being lazy here :P
Warin61 (2019-08-21 10:33:30+00:00): The relation is not required. Delete it.. but before you do .. copy hte relevant bits on to the single outer way tagged building=* (not the parts).

The outline way building=* can have all the common information of the entrire building - address, operator etc. The building:part=* says they are members of the building.
Pierce (2019-08-21 11:21:10+00:00): But if there is no relation, how are the parts related to the the main perimeter building?

I feel what you're suggesting goes against what's described here on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings
Warin61 (2019-08-21 23:51:15+00:00): From that description. 
"The building outline represents the area of land covered by the union of all parts of the building. The outline may in most cases also be considered the building footprint. This is A CLOSED WAY or multipolygon tagged with building=*. "

A multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. The one here breaks that rule. There is no need to a multiplygon as this building is not complex enough to demand one.

The main perimeter of the building surrounds each and every building:part=* and as such are part of the main perimeter...
SomeoneElse (2019-08-20 12:36:55+00:00): Thanks for fixing.
mavl (2019-11-10 13:04:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
CENTRALHUB (2019-08-30 07:15:15+00:00): Would you like to fix the town boundary in Linzhou? You duplicated the shape (and you mapped it long long ago :)
katpatuka (2019-08-30 10:29:37+00:00): Where did you find a duplicate shape? I had a quick check but didn't find anything... Do you have an id of duplicate ways or relations?
CENTRALHUB (2019-08-30 16:26:58+00:00): Zoom to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73489148#map=15/36.0723/113.8014. You see two copies of boundary.
katpatuka (2019-08-30 16:45:59+00:00): Now I see what you meant ;) - fixed.
StephaneP (2019-08-19 13:51:19+00:00): Hello,

La classification du type de voie n'est pas une chose aisée. La couche Route 500 peut aider.
Mais là, non, cette route n'est pas une primary.
J'ai corrigé.

Stf
aixbrick (2019-08-19 11:36:42+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
du hast hier und ein Stück weiter das Restaurant und den Rewe neu eingetragen, obwohl diese bereits vorhanden sind.
Und bei deinen vorherigen Changesets hast du teilweise wichtige Daten gelöscht. Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3823139978/history. Hier hast du korrekt erfasste Öffnungszeiten um die wichtige Angabe PH (Public Holidays = Feiertage) gekürzt. Zudem ist die Angabe level=1 falsch. Der Saturn erstreckt sich über zwei Stockwerke.
Warum diese Änderungen?
Gruß
aixbrick (2019-08-27 14:20:17+00:00): Leider hast du nicht reagiert. Ich habe daher mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73801275 die Daten zusammengefügt bzw. korrigiert.
Jakka (2019-08-20 07:37:05+00:00): aandacht http://www.ngi.be/topomapviewer/gebruiksvoorwaarden.html
habi (2020-08-06 10:16:26+00:00): Dir sind dabei die Häuser etwas verrutscht: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73491032 :)
Ich hab' sie wieder an den - nach amtl. Vermessung - richtigen Platz zurückbugsiert: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=89031818
Gruss, Habi
chatelao (2020-08-06 11:55:36+00:00): Ui - das tut mir leid. Danke für den Fix, Oli
PT-53 (2019-08-19 15:34:03+00:00): Hallo Marco,
Du hast diesen Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6723300885/history
mit shop=department_store + operator=Kaufland eingetragen.
Das "Kaufland" ist bereits hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709204644/history
eingezeichnet.
Was soll Dein neuer Knoten abbilden?
Ist dort ein weiteres Geschäft?
Fragende Grüße
maraf24 (2019-09-03 21:18:29+00:00): Ta droga naprawdę nazywa się "Trakt Pieszy nad Włodzicą"?
balandzik (2019-09-04 07:03:50+00:00): Sprawdziłem na stronie miejskiej, jednak to jest "Szlak Grodu nad rzeką Włodzicą"
maraf24 (2019-09-04 07:09:49+00:00): Jeśli szlak jest oznakowany w terenie to można go zmapować w postaci relacji.
balandzik (2019-09-04 07:13:32+00:00): Jest oznakowany, są tabliczki. Czyli usunąć nazwę, a dodać relację z tą nazwą?
maraf24 (2019-09-04 10:21:54+00:00): Tak.
Jessy73 (2023-01-15 14:02:09+00:00): Bonjour,
On (Groupe OSM sur les Activités de Pleine Nature) se pose un peu la question de la pertinence des itinéraires de ski de randonnée (qui ne sont pas officiels, hors station et qu'on retrouve seulement sur les topos ou cartes IGN) de les garder dans OSM. 
De quelle source prenez vous vos tracés ? 
- Sortie perso ? 
- IGN ? Mais pas tjrs pertinent sur le risque sur certains passages, car on a une image d'itinéraires "facile, sécurisés" 
- Topos ?
On parlait de la pertinence pour : 
- La responsabilité (qqn suit "bêtement" le tracé) après en soit chacun est responsable en montagne 
- Le choix des itinéraires. Savoir si on quadrille la montagne de ces tracés en fonction des sources qui sont nombreuses.
J'aimerai avoir votre point de vue. 
Merci
szydzio (2019-08-21 12:57:56+00:00): te lanes=1 na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197855966 to z racji na jakiś remont czy tylko ze wzgledu na to że jest tam wąska droga w kiepskim stanie technicznym?
gscscnd (2019-08-21 13:02:16+00:00): OIDP jest tam jeden pas (lub inaczej: nie ma wydzielonych pasów ruchu). Może źle zapamiętałem…
szydzio (2019-08-21 13:15:31+00:00): Istotnie, choć "bezpasowość" jest praktycznie na całej DW 390 (pomijając małe fragmenty w Złotym Stoku i Lądku)
gscscnd (2019-08-21 13:24:55+00:00): Nie zaszkodzi dodać lanes=1 na pozostałych odcinkach, dla secondary to raczej nie jest domyślna wartość.
szydzio (2019-08-21 13:28:32+00:00): Zastanawiam sie jeszcze nad dodaniem smoothness=intermediate na najbardziej sfatygowanym odcinku...
gscscnd (2019-08-21 13:33:27+00:00): Koniecznie!
Yunkers (2019-08-22 09:54:54+00:00): Czy dawanie w takich przypadkach lanes=1 jest na pewno poprawne? Koniec końców są tam dwa pasy, tylko niewyznaczone, a nie jeden pas. Angielska wiki sugeruje, żeby dawać tag lane_markings=no lub width=*
"Many narrow, cobblestone and rural roads do not have lane markings. Also, in some places, even broader roads that function as 4-laned highways may not have lane markings. To signify that a road has no lane markings, it is recommended to use an explicit tag like lane_markings=no or similar instead of an odd value for the lanes=* key like 0, 1.5 or none because the latter is ambiguous and may not be processed correctly by data consumers.[1]

For narrow roads (without marked lanes) in particular, it is very useful to tag the width=* of the road, see below."
gscscnd (2019-08-22 11:33:31+00:00): Było poprawne zanim pojawił się ten tekst na Wiki. Wcześniej nie było tagu lane_markings, więc niektórzy oznaczali „de facto” pasy, a inni te namalowane.
vojtechzaboril (2022-02-03 11:35:44+00:00): Dobrý den, toll=yes u trajektu je podle mě špatně: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513151397
Toll značí mýto, tady stačí to fee=*
Díky.
V