piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Chris Fleming (2015-01-26 13:13:51+00:00): Hi, it looks like this changeset deleted the woodlands from Corstorphine Hill?
Chris Fleming (2015-01-26 14:18:49+00:00): I have restored the woods.
SammysHP (2020-11-16 09:12:15+00:00): Bist du dir sicher, dass der Ehlershausener Weg bei Großmoor/Jägerheide noch ein Stück direkt neben dem Waldweg verläuft?
didimosi (2020-11-16 11:11:09+00:00): ... nee, so sollte das nicht sein. Ist jetzt richtig.
Thomas8122 (2015-01-26 18:30:34+00:00): Kennst ja jetzt meine Meinung zu landuse an Wege klatschen.
agsochi (2015-01-27 06:48:03+00:00): Приветствую. Соедините пож начало трассы с дорогой, чтобы было понятно где "въезд".
trigpoint (2015-01-26 14:24:03+00:00): Hi
I think something has gone a little wrong here.
Russett Way already exists and the new road you have drawn is on top of a house.
Are you sure this is correct, if you need any help, feel free to ask.
Crystalization (2015-01-26 14:37:14+00:00): Russett Way is a bit of a strange 'road' in that there is 2 parts to it and only one of them is on the maps.

Subsequently, checking Google I see that they also don't list the other section.

I feel some explaining needs to be done so you understand my logic here ha. Looking at a satellite image you'll see a car park in between the mapped Russett Way and Bramley Court. The road I mapped is actually posted as Russett Way and leads you to said car park for which the people in Russett Way use. I know this a fact as I live there.
robert (2015-01-26 15:30:01+00:00): FWIW this is what current os locator has to say about it http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=644615
Crystalization (2015-01-26 15:32:20+00:00): Robert, I have no idea what that green box means lol.
robert (2015-01-26 18:33:27+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OS_Locator_Musical_Chairs/FAQ
mueschel (2019-12-15 13:44:35+00:00): Hi,
I found this area (and 2 adjacent ones) with only foreign tags - seems like you forgot to convert them to proper OSM tags. Could you have a look?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324501180

Thanks!
Durko_freemap (2015-01-26 18:35:55+00:00): Zdravim Vladim, este by bolo vhodne pridavat komentare a zdroj zakreslenych dat. Vyzyvaju Vas na to aj tabulky, ktore dostavate pred odoslanim dat.
user_5359 (2016-11-18 09:43:47+00:00): Hallo, hast Du etwas dagegen, dass wir den Schützverein Herbornseelbach 1928 e.V. mit club=sport, sporting=shooting (wie jetzt üblicher ist) kennzeichnen?
endlich (2016-11-18 10:16:57+00:00): Absolut nicht. ;-)
user_5359 (2016-11-18 10:49:56+00:00): Done!
_al (2015-01-27 17:04:57+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Danke für Deinen Beitrag!

Kleinigkeiten: Bitte Wege mit vorhandenen verbinden und für einen Wanderweg im Wald bitte highway=path verwenden. footway ist mehr was für die Stadt.

Weiterhin viel Spaß mit OSM!

Servus, Andreas
Thomas8122 (2015-01-26 18:24:43+00:00): Das nenne ich Tagging für den Renderer. Mit sowas erst gar nicht anfangen. Revert.
mkuhn (2015-01-26 21:01:46+00:00): Warum hast du dann den anonymen User zum Humanitarian Layer geschickt, und nicht in die Datenbank?
Thomas8122 (2015-01-26 21:06:34+00:00): Dann guck doch bitte nochmal nach was ich kommentiert habe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/306081
mkuhn (2015-01-26 21:17:15+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tagging_for_the_renderer
"Die Redewendung „Don't tag for the renderer“ (Attributiere nicht für den Renderer!) hat bei OSM eine lange Geschichte und bedeutet: Nicht absichtlich falsche Attribute vergeben, nur weil diese zur gewünschten Darstellung führen."

Hausnummern auf Nodes setzen ist Usus, wie du in der Umgebung siehst. 

Nach dem 1% Prinzip stören sich für den einen, der die Anmerkung macht, 10 bis 100 Leute an der fehlenden Hausnummer.
Thomas8122 (2015-01-27 16:39:43+00:00): was du gemacht hast, war aber die Hausnummer vom Haus zu löschen, um sie Mapnik-gerecht als Einzelnode wieder einzufügen. Wenn das nicht Taggen für den Renderer ist, dann weiß ich auch nicht...
Thomas8122 (2015-01-26 18:26:18+00:00): Landuse an Wege muss echt nicht sein.
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-27 22:18:00+00:00): Was the building demolished?  I read online that the building was sold and that a new restaurant would be opening here soon.  Did you mean to just delete the business info instead of deleting the building?
mEstruch (2015-01-27 22:20:44+00:00): Yes, I just wanted to delete the business but instead I deleted the building. I added the building again in another change. I guess it is not reflected yet. I don't know about when is it opening, it has no signs of opening yet.
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-27 22:25:41+00:00): Well, if you don't mind, I'm going to restore the building way from this changeset because it had all the address info on it.  I think it would be the best option here.  Do you agree?
mEstruch (2015-01-27 22:26:58+00:00): I agree. Go ahead.
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-27 22:35:46+00:00): Restored in Changeset 28454442. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28454442
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-27 22:36:30+00:00): BTW, welcome to OSM.  If you have any questions on how to do stuff here in OSM, let me know, and I'll try to help you out. :)
mEstruch (2015-01-27 23:15:43+00:00): Thanks! I'll keep looking around and I'll be more careful. :D
atpl_pilot (2015-01-28 03:20:47+00:00): Vandalismus, USER fhigeoq wurde bereits gesperrt.
atpl_pilot (2015-01-28 03:21:30+00:00): Vandalismus, USER fhigeoq wurde bereits gesperrt.
atpl_pilot (2015-01-28 03:21:45+00:00): Vandalismus, USER fhigeoq wurde bereits gesperrt.
atpl_pilot (2015-01-28 03:22:04+00:00): Vandalismus, USER fhigeoq wurde bereits gesperrt.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-06 01:52:09+00:00): Dear V: What does the tag c4a_toilets mean?
What is a user comment of 'user comments'?
What is meant to be mapped here?
Peilscheibe (2015-02-25 07:37:18+00:00): The former tertiary from the E 8 southbound to Ramfjordnes is not part of the E 8. I changed it back to tertiary.
aceman444 (2015-02-03 19:35:14+00:00): Dobry den, podobne tu, asi natural=rock.
Mirecnet (2015-03-04 19:20:15+00:00): Zdravim,
jedna sa o tuto skalu
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/93625765

Opravene na rock. Dik za pripomienku. Snat sa to na mape zobrazi normalne :)
aceman444 (2015-03-04 20:50:57+00:00): Super, dakujem. Tie elektricke stoziare v pozadi teda dokresluju idylku :)
Владимир К (2016-07-27 11:54:02+00:00): Вы неверно обозначаете вытровалы. Во-первых natural=heath это совершенно определенный биом в определенных местах. Во-вторых для ветровала придумали отдельный тэг
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=15590

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:wood
_Andrea_ (2018-06-12 11:28:37+00:00): FYI: I substituted the fords with the bridges after a survey along the "Alter Branzoller Weg 6"
BeKri (2015-01-31 12:56:25+00:00): What are you doing ?
Is sehr a special problem to delete a komplett part of a street at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89979654/history#map=17/48.21507/11.46298  ???
be so kind to fix it.
ratrun (2015-01-31 14:19:55+00:00): Hello,

thanks that you noticed this. I have an idea how and why this happened: 
I believe that it was triggered by concurrent fixing the change 
triggered by user nickel715 in version 6 and OSMI fixing done by user 
"kartler175" uploaded with version 7 at 26.1 at 19:06 and my my OSMI 
triggered deletion with version 8 uploaded at 26.1 19:53. I remember 
that I got a "conflict" dialog and obviously was not able to manage the 
conflict solving corretly.

I reverted the deletion. The object history is remained.
Apollo-74 (2015-01-26 18:48:52+00:00): Подправил номера домов на правильные :)
kartler175 (2015-01-27 22:30:15+00:00): Hauptstraße und Peilstraße nochmal angelegt, obwohl sie schon existieren! Wieso?
JOSM gibt doch da eine Fehlermeldung!
fischhonig (2015-01-28 10:26:01+00:00): wieso neu angelegt und wieso JOSM Fehlermeldung? Ich hab die Straße geteilt, da ich eine neue Wanderwegrelation angelegt / geändert habe die nun mal nicht über die ganze Straße führt. Damit bist du mit dem abgeschnittenen Teil immer der Ersteller. Ist halt so aber wo ist genau dein Problem?
kartler175 (2015-01-28 13:20:43+00:00): Offenbar hast Du dabei was falsch gemacht. Lade dir mal den Bereich und lass den JOSM-Validator drüberlaufen!

Ich bin mit dem OSM-Inspector drauf gestoßen, der hier unverbundene Wege meldet.

Wer der Ersteller ist, ist im Prinzip egal.
fischhonig (2015-01-28 16:44:23+00:00): seltsam! Den Effekt hatte ich bisher noch nicht und keine Ahnung was da passiert ist. Ich hab jetzt von Hand die doppelten Wege und Punkte raus, sollte alles wieder passen.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-05 19:15:50+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Thanks for adding http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3312692661 , but currently it seems to be in the middle of the road?  Is it actually north or south of the road (or is the road itself in the wrong place)?
malenki (2015-01-27 17:20:00+00:00): Hallo malta-dinger,

es wäre eine gute Idee, den offiziellen Straßenname von Kapellenwinkel bei Kapellenwinkel zu belassen. Dies wurde dir auch bereits per Nachricht über das OSM-Nachrichtensystem mitgeteilt.
Ich habe den Name wieder korrigiert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4607202/history
Endres Pelka (2015-01-27 23:43:17+00:00): In this edit, you moved some nodes of the Crimean-Ukrainian border a significant distance (about 1 km). May you please state the source you're using, the reason for this change? Why don't you write any changeset comments?
Durko_freemap (2015-01-27 06:57:08+00:00): Zdravim Vladim, tag name=Chodník vyhodte, staci ze je tam footway :o), pri krizovani cesty s chodnikom ak teda nieje chodnik nad cestou(mimourovnove krizovanie), tak cesta a chodnik by mali mat spolocny bod, na tento bod este mozete dat prechod pre chodcov ked tam samozrejme existuje. Dalej chodnik nad riekou je na inej urovni, pred riekou a za riekou mate bod, tieto body oznacte, stlacte P (rozdelite chodnik) a na tuto oddelenu cast dajte este tagy bridge=yes a layer=1 (tym vysvetlite ako sa krizuju). Na tieto veci Vas upozornuje aj JOSM, v pravej casti obrazovky mate "vysledky overovania", ked date "overit" zobrazia sa Vam konflikty ktore ste vykonal resp. vykonali ludia pred Vami, co viete prosim vyrieste, co neviete vyriesit nechajte tak :o)
iWowik (2015-04-13 13:20:50+00:00): Местами позатерли неверным place_name'ом верный name.
Пример: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1635782
dvdzero (2015-04-13 13:41:49+00:00): ciao
sei sicuro che questa sia una cycleway e non residential?
dvdzero (2015-04-13 13:42:46+00:00): e poi si chiama Dolcè?
Paolo C (2015-04-13 13:52:36+00:00): se per residential intendi che può passare anche gente che fa trekking allora si, comunque il tracciato è un singletrack abbastanza tecnico.
Paolo C (2015-04-13 13:53:44+00:00): si il paesino di chiama dolcè: il tratto finale della traccia (dentro il paese) è invece una ciclabile
dvdzero (2015-04-13 13:59:51+00:00): mi riferisco appunto a questa ciclabile
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324569071
dalle satellitari e da google street mi sembra una residential (Via Molino)
Poi forse su questa han messo una corsia ciclabile ... questo non lo so
Paolo C (2015-04-13 14:39:30+00:00): si confermo via molino è una strada con la ciclabile a fianco per accedere alla ciclabile lungo fiumo
GerdP (2015-11-13 13:57:10+00:00): please review:
I've changed highway=island to 
traffic_calming=island
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279155923
b_mortgat (2015-01-26 21:07:04+00:00): En attente :
 * Localiser le consulat de Slovénie (arcades de l'hôtel de ville de Saint-Étienne)
 * Code ISO 3166-1 du Kosovo n'existe pas
Jojo4u (2016-11-17 23:11:33+00:00): Das Nachtwächter ist eher nur Bordell und nicht Hotel, oder? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123184381/history
Skippern (2015-01-27 02:07:43+00:00): Favor apagar relação 4222701, no_u_turn relação não pode volta em si. Voce ja crio milhares desses relações, favor tira este como esses dados não adicionando nada. O relação 4155571 e valido.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-06 18:53:57+00:00): Note that this turned out not to exist.  See http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3312965713/history .
SomeoneElse (2015-01-27 20:17:01+00:00): Hello - just noticed that you've added the "man_made=windmill" tag to a ruined former windmill near Fritchley http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1424621220/history#map=15/53.0772/-1.4557.  It's a while since I was there, but if I remember correctly when I was it was pretty definitely ruined - only just recognisable as a former windmill.

Has it been renovated and is it working as a windmill again?  Given it's location, I'd be very surprised indeed.
zmarties (2015-01-27 20:48:05+00:00): No, still ruinous, but the man_made=windmill tag applies to windmills in all states of preservation or dereliction, not just working windmills.  Your other attributes on the note remain, to guide those who need to make a distinction based on such state information.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-27 20:50:48+00:00): It's not in any sense a windmill though - just a pile of stones that once used to function as one.  historic:man_made=windmill I could perhaps understand, but man_made=windmill is writing cheques it definitely can't cash!
zmarties (2015-01-27 21:19:22+00:00): historic:man_made would apply when "ground truth" is that the feature no longer exists.  Whilst it still exists, it's right to tag it with the appropriate attributes, and those correctly indicate that the feature is a ruinous example of a windmill
SomeoneElse (2015-01-27 22:00:50+00:00): Have you been and had a look at it?  What evidence do you have that it _is_ a windmill?
MarkusHD (2016-03-22 20:03:16+00:00): Wo kommt eigentlich der Name "Haarbruch" her? In der Maps4BW-Karte, die du als source angegeben hast, steht er nicht.
MarkusHD (2016-03-24 18:59:13+00:00): Stand als Adresse in der Zeitung im Zusammenhang mit dem Hoffest. (Info per PN)
Romwriter (2024-01-26 12:14:52+00:00): Hallo Chenshi, Du hast hier "OT_grenzen" ("Ortsteil-Grenzen"?) gezeichnet, aber noch keine passenden Relationen dazu erstellt. Kannst Du sagen, ob die Grenzen noch aktuell sind und wie die Ortsteile heißen? Dann würde ich das gerne nachtragen. Beste Grüße, Romwriter
Jonathan Bennett (2015-01-27 10:30:34+00:00): To describe what's in this location as a Windmill would be stretching the definition so far as to be meaningless. There is a tower which was last used as a mill over 100 years ago, and which has been incorporated into a residential property to the extent it now has a chimney stack. 

I'm going to delete this node on the grounds that it's actively misleading. There is no working mill here, it's historical value has been destroyed by the conversion to residential use and there is no public access in any case.
zmarties (2015-01-27 20:33:49+00:00): I disagree - tagging this as a windmill is useful, matches the intent of the tag and its use throughout the world, and adds to the overall value of the OSM map data. The windmill tag is certainly not used to mark only working mills (of which there are vanishly few), nor does it imply any public access to the building.

I suggest the correct action is not to delete the tag, but to add additional tags to further enhance the map - since you point out that this windmill is now used for residential purposes, and is not publically accessible then those would be excellent attributes to record (though I suspect that you could assume non-accessibilty by nature of it being a residence).
MannequinBaby (2015-01-26 23:49:08+00:00): Addition of Sunrise Park NOT Umpqua bank.
ndm (2015-01-27 00:21:51+00:00): What's a sculpure? If I remember it rightly it's a vertical windmill/generator
zmarties (2015-01-27 20:02:58+00:00): Sorry, typo for sculpture.  Since the primary reason for this structure seems to be to look attractive, I think it's best mapped as that.  (Windmill is certainly the wrong tag - that's for historic mills.  Given the poor design, and the sheltered location, I don't think this is realistically for power generation, though I grant you it can rotate in the wind to further its sculptural attractiveness).
kartler175 (2015-04-21 15:47:12+00:00): Nach Luftbild Einhahnregelung nicht nachvollziehbar. Folgen für das Routing:http://www.openrouteservice.org/?pos=9.078971157004743%2C48.5318467302233&zoom=15&layer=B000FTTTTTTTTTT&routeOpt=Shortest&avHigh=false&avToll=false&avArea=&wp=9.077469119955959%2C48.532656656630756%2C9.077903637816776%2C48.530198418925&lang=en&routeLang=en&distUnit=m&version=undefined&avUnpaved=false&avFerry=false
SK53 (2015-01-27 10:34:14+00:00): Yes they should. When they connect to roads then they can be used for routing on foot (something I use OSM for all the time).

If it's a public right of way its also good to add designation=* and then we have it documented. I presume Staffords Acre is a relatively new road.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-03 21:45:41+00:00): This seems to be a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/926542939 - surely some mistake!
SomeoneElse (2015-02-06 00:38:55+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I noticed that you added a couple of roadside footpaths here, including http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324560443 .  That's not connected to anything, so routers etc. will never be able to find it.  If it is just a footpath at the side of the road (as suggested by the imagery) then the normal way to add that to OSM would be to add "sidewalk=left", "sidewalk=right" or "sidewalk=both" depending on which side(s) of the road there's a footpath 

Anyway, hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help.  Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.

Cheers, Andy
sefpacific (2019-11-08 23:34:08+00:00): Hi Andy

It looks like there is a lot of updating required here.  I think I have inputted too much unnecessary data which probably hasn't helped OSM.
woodpeck (2015-04-24 07:04:03+00:00): Hello Omnific, as you probably know all data imports to OSM are subject to our import guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) which include, among other things, that a public discussion is required before the import. I cannot immediately see the discussion of your Charlotte import, or a mention in the import catalogue. Please explain.
Omnific (2015-04-24 14:46:13+00:00): Someone else (I think it was BeckerMN_Import or something) contacted me about helping with the imports. I have no idea about how he/she discussed them with the community.
rickmastfan67 (2015-05-01 14:53:31+00:00): Unfortunately, Becker_MN_Import_Acc never did discuss the import with the community (either via the Wiki or talk-us/imports).  He even got blocked (see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/596 ) for a short time because of the mass import.  Some of the import he did in Charlotte even duplicated buildings traced by other users and several duplicated nodes in some areas.  Clearly showing he wasn't verifying anything before importing it to the database here.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-02 02:39:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 30706685, 30705742, 30707787, 30707005, 30706320, 30708240, 30708754, 30707415 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-02 02:39:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 30706685, 30705742, 30707787, 30707005, 30706320, 30708240, 30708754, 30707415 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
Swen Wacker (2015-01-27 16:04:27+00:00): Vorsicht: Hier ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=480909#p480909
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-10 10:08:35+00:00): Co to za jakoś dziwnie rozrysowana ulica? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322948141
sorbovit (2015-05-10 18:52:47+00:00): Wiem, wygląda może dziwnie, ale jezdnia w ulicy Grobla jest fizycznie rozdzielona wyspą z barierkami, a w związku z jednokierunkowym ruchem w tym rejonie, jeden pas należy do DK 11, a drugi nie.
seichter (2015-01-29 10:03:48+00:00): In addr:postcode darf nur die PLZ stehen,
der Ortsname gehört in addr:city bzw. suburb

Vorsicht mit Leerzeichen am Ende von Zeichenketten. Nicht alle Anwendungen können damit umgehen.

geändert
aceman444 (2015-01-29 19:22:06+00:00): No ja neviem, ale podla mna ta Billa pri CBC III tak kriva naozaj bola. Je to vidiet aj na bingu. Prestavali tu budovu?
Peter Potisk (2015-01-29 19:38:42+00:00): To záleží či sa budova mapuje po strešnom plášti alebo po základoch.  Ten trojuholník vzniká až na druhom poschodí. Z ulice to vidieť nie je. Pozri streetview od Googla.
Peter Potisk (2015-01-29 19:39:21+00:00): https://www.google.sk/maps/@48.149775,17.125269,3a,66.8y,69.63h,90.76t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1swFYK1JKAYghb5-NnbLYq9A!2e0?hl=sk
aceman444 (2015-01-29 19:46:15+00:00): Aha ano. Myslim, ze sa mapuje priemet zhora. Takze vsetky maximalne vycnelky, aj ked nejdu az po zem. Tak potom je tam take V, ze stred steny od Karadzicovej je trochu posunuty doprava.
muzirian (2017-03-28 17:33:27+00:00): found a viewpoint added in fort kochi, but no name or detail, can you tell what feature it was?
YOz (2017-03-28 22:21:58+00:00): Yes it was some time ago, but if I remember well it was a rooftop viewpoint from a shop.
muzirian (2017-03-29 14:03:55+00:00): do you remember what you saw? :p
DanMacdonald (2016-03-15 06:27:45+00:00): BIS Training Solutions
http://www.trainanddevelop.ca
Unit 4 – 41 Broadway Boulevard
Sherwood Park, Alberta, T8H 2C1
Canada
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-11-14 12:36:29+00:00): Hi fserges, 
why have you changed admin_level=6 to 5 for the raions arround Sevastopolj, while all other raions on Crimea adre admin_level=6
fserges (2024-11-15 12:00:11+00:00): In accordance with the rules, districts included in the city of FEDERAL significance are allocated in admin_level=5. See Sevastopol http://atd.openstreetmap.ru/r3788485.html or Saint Petersburg http://atd.openstreetmap.ru/r337422.html . This does not apply to an ordinary city!! For example, http://atd.openstreetmap.ru/r269701.html where the district has admin_level=9.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-11-15 13:25:46+00:00): Clear, thanks, but what about https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1469659 is this ok?
fserges (2024-11-15 15:10:25+00:00): Please look here (in Russian) - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:admin_level .
dforsi (2015-01-27 16:57:36+00:00): Controlla l'anello perché non è chiuso e interseca in più punti il sentiero pre-esistente
CloCkWeRX (2015-01-28 14:35:53+00:00): Nice work on the buildings! Let me know if you want a hand tracing a few in the area
flohoff (2015-01-27 14:01:18+00:00): Hi,
wie üblich hast du wieder kein Changeset kommentar was wirklich total doof ist weil niemand nachvollziehen kann was du wirklich machst. 

Da du hier auch Gebäude eingetragen hast: Es gibt den tracer2 der zusammen mit dem josm automatisch aus der Liegenschaftskarte Gebäude übernehmen kann. Das ist einfacher und schneller als mit Potlatch da irgendwas einzutragen.

Flo
Weide (2015-01-30 07:19:43+00:00): Zu Langenberg (und vielleicht anderen): Bei gleichnamigen Haltestellen bedeutet die Reihenfolge stop-platform, dass es ein Halt mit zwei Angaben ist. Die Reihenfolge platform-stop bedeutet, dass es zwei Halte mit jeweils einer Angabe sind.
Weide (2015-01-30 08:17:06+00:00): Nochmal Langenberg: Bei Umbenennungen muss der Name der stop_area mit geändert werden. Die Namen müssen immer gleich sein. Ich hab den Namen der stop-area aber so gelassen und die anderen wieder auf den alten Wert geändert, da das Ding seit 2003 Velbert-Langenberg heißt. Nur die Bushaltestelle daneben heißt Langenberg Bahnhof.
emacsen (2015-01-27 14:28:22+00:00): Hi- great job with the edits!

Would you mind setting a changeset comment on your changesets please?
literan (2015-01-28 10:51:44+00:00): а я на контуре ставлю тег was:building=yes + note=снесено в 2014 году, и никто ничего не возвращает!