piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kovoschiz (2022-10-01 10:32:32+00:00): Please be careful not to move unrelated features onto `boundary=administrative`.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-01 09:18:47+00:00): Hi Serienchiller,

I guess something went wrong. Could you check the following node, which you created: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10065666815

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
user_5359 (2022-10-03 09:37:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/252787813. what is the meaning of this tags? See https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:cafe=time%20cafe . For the tag „buger king“ = „yes“: Did you mean mean: amenity=fast_food and name=Burger King?
rhtb0 (2022-10-01 13:30:14+00:00): 역의 몇번 출구는 건물이 아니라 점으로 편집해야 합니다.
점을 만들고 railway=subway_entrance를 넣어주세요.
대전역을 참고하시기 바랍니다.
대전맨 (2022-10-04 15:15:52+00:00): 점 표시로 하게 되어있는건 알고 있습니다. 점도 표시하고 건물도 지도에 표현하고 싶은데 어떻게 해야하나요?
대전맨 (2022-10-04 15:19:45+00:00): 그냥 하던대로 점도 표시하고 건물도 표기하면 되나요?
rhtb0 (2022-10-05 03:41:07+00:00): 대부분의 출구들은 건물처럼 보이는 지붕(building =roop)일 겁니다. train_station 태그는 기차역 건물만 쓰는 태그라서 출구에 쓰지 않아야 합니다. 다른 지역들을 보시면 진짜 건물과 지붕이 있는 곳을 제외하고 점 표시만 있습니다.
대전맨 (2022-10-05 03:44:00+00:00): 그럼 지붕으로 태그를 달면 될까요
대전맨 (2022-10-05 03:45:46+00:00): 네 안내해주셔서 감사합니다 지붕만 달랑 있는 입구면 지붕으로 태그하고 역 건물까지 있으면 기차역 표시로 하겠습니다
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
☆Finvenkulo (2022-10-05 07:38:42+00:00): Próbowałem scalić kilka „budynków” pochodzących z importu w jeden, użyłem do tego funkcji „Scal” w edytorze iD. Funkcja ta tworzy zbędną relację.

Jak rozumiem w przyszłości powinienem:
1. Rozciągnąć główną część na cały obszar budynku.
2. Usunąć poboczne części (np. way202209388) lub przerobić je na building:part.
B_KSL (2022-10-05 08:04:50+00:00): iD tworzy dużo błędów :) To się nadaje do postawienia punktu albo wpisania paru tagów. Jak dużo i skomplikowane rzeczy malujesz to zapomnij o iD.
Co do budynków: jeden budynek=jedna linia czyli zewnętrzny obrys. Jeśli nie chcesz się bawić w 3D to poboczne części usuwaj, chyba że z jakiegoś powodu muszą być odróżnione od całości. Wtedy building:part. Jeśli potrzebna relacja (np. dla 3D) to w większości będzie typu building. Multipolygon tylko jak masz jakąś "dziurę" w środku budynku.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
MxxCon (2022-10-04 04:02:55+00:00): Hello.
There are a couple of issues with this edit.

It seems like for no reason you attached an address node to a sidewalk near 1st st and 7th ave. This is not a correct way to map such features since address is obviously not part of a sidewalk.

You named a community garden as "Plantville". Where is that name coming from?

You mapped 2nd ave bike lane as a separate way. However, it is already as tagged on 2nd ave way itself. Your change goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline.
Additionally, the name you gave to that bike lane goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions guideline.

Similarly, Washington Park's baseball field is already tagged in the sport pitch area.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
wireguy (2022-10-01 09:15:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM mkp5531!  Thanks for making the changes to the area.  I added access=private to the pool. Let me know if you have any q's.  Keep mapping!
Kovoschiz (2022-10-01 10:33:29+00:00): Please don't use `=peak` if it's not a high point over the entire surrounding.
Kovoschiz (2022-10-01 10:38:11+00:00):   Please don't move things wildly. Use different points..
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mcliquid (2022-10-01 11:15:23+00:00): Hi, hier sollte es wohl layer statt llayer sein oder? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553086974
Kovoschiz (2022-10-01 10:34:42+00:00): Please create a new point for other features.
Kovoschiz (2022-10-05 06:37:08+00:00): 2. Please don't make up English names by transliteration or romanization from Cantonese. Use `name:yue-Latn=` for the latter.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-01 11:23:36+00:00): Hi andrewth1, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several mapped service ways? Thanks.

Full changeset information:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=126846854#18/40.70010/-75.21001

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
andrewth1 (2022-10-01 15:56:38+00:00): This parking structure was reconstructed and all of the driveways are in different locations now. In addition, someone mapped all of the driveways on every floor of the structure, which is not the proper way to map this. There are multiple entrances which serve different floors, and any guidance on how to map this would be appreciated.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Kovoschiz (2022-10-01 10:36:01+00:00): Please create a new point for different features. Don't move things wildly. If names are wrong, correct them only, not removing the entire thing.
user_17222751 (2022-10-02 06:30:59+00:00): okkkk...sorry><
PT-53 (2022-10-01 06:21:04+00:00): Hallo kdkeller,
Du hast das Restaurant Zum Münsterwirt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10063880780/history
neu eingetragen.
Ist dann das Café am Münster
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/280010299/history
jetzt geschlossen oder gibt es dort beides?
Fragende Grüße
kdkeller (2022-10-01 07:17:19+00:00): Ich hab mir die gleiche Frage gestellt, als ich wieder daheim war, aber vorsichtshalber mal das Café nicht gelöscht. Vielen Dank für deine Nachfrage.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
BubbaJuice (2022-10-01 06:00:46+00:00): Adding not aligning
jmsbert (2022-11-05 21:31:56+00:00): Hallo bamghi,
Willkommen bei OSM. In dieser und einigen anderen Deiner Bearbeitungen hast Du Objekte gelöscht, da diese nicht mehr existieren bzw. geschlossen wurden. Das Löschen von Objekten sollte das letzte Mittel sein, da hiermit die komplette Historie der Objekte verloren geht. Stattdessen besser den Objekten das Tag "disused:" vorweg stellen, siehe hierzu auch [1]. Damit werden die Objekte nicht mehr auf der Karte dargestellt, sind aber in der Datenbank noch vorhanden. Sollte das Geschäft / Restaurant unter neuem Betreiber wieder eröffnen, so würde der Knoten wieder reaktiviert.
Kurzum: Bitte nur in Ausnahmefällen Objekte löschen, besser prefixe wie "disused:", "demolished:" nutzen.

[1]: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-10-08 22:22:13+00:00): Jeg går ud fra at det er en fejl at ehle Romalt Boulvard blev ensrettet.
osmviborg (2022-10-09 05:30:37+00:00): 👍
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-01 08:34:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I review mappings at random and check on the quality of mapping.
Here you mapped a lot of vague traces as unclassified highways. I don't think that mapping these are required. They do not connect settlements etc. However. If you want to map and tag them anyway, track should be a better tag.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126849819
Frans S (2022-10-01 08:07:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
You mapped a few buildings here.
1 building overlaps an existing service road.
Please avoid that my moving the road a bit aside between the 2 buildings here.
Never let nodes of buildings connect to other features, like here, a road.
The buildings seem to be not correct rectangular, but they are. On the imagery, which is taken under a certain angle, it seems a bit of offset. But please square each of them with the Q key,
Best regards



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126849845
Frans S (2022-10-01 07:58:30+00:00): Hello,  My name is Frans S and I review mappings as requested. 
Your mappings are precise. Well done.
Just 1 remark. Here you added a road to the north where it connects to another road, you mapped a minute earlier. It is a bit above the task border. Highways need to be connected. GPS navigation systems cannot see the other road because there is a gap now. So each road should be connected to crossing road.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126849904
abakus_uploader (2022-10-01 22:38:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
AnWangzi (2022-10-01 07:50:07+00:00): 修正41路的路线 注记写错了
Frans S (2022-10-01 08:20:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126850194