piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Map-Peter (2021-01-16 22:32:02+00:00): Hallo Sioux22, 
 
beachte immer das Copyright! 
 
Hier hast das Bild (Deep-Link) einfach von dieser Webseite ( http://www.ts-parfum.ru/video/y810sWQQm4w , unten drittes Bild von links) genommen. 
 
Der Bild-Urheber ist "Peter aus NB" bzw. "peeewiii13" ( https://www.youtube.com/user/peeewiii13 ) 
und das original Bild ist das Thumbnail ( https://www.youtube.com/user/peeewiii13/search?query=Neubrandenburg%3A%20Abstieg%20vom%20Jahnstein%20(April%202020) ) 
von seinem Video ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y810sWQQm4w ). 
 
Die Beachtung des Copyright nehmen wir bei OSM sehr ernst - siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Copyright - Lese das bitte und halte dich zukünftig immer daran. 
 
Ich werde diesen Vorfall nicht der DWG ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Data_working_group ) melden, weil ich denke das es nicht es eine böse Absicht deinerseits war. 
 
PS: 
Ich habe mit "Peter aus NB" bzw. "peeewiii13" nichts zu tun - wir haben nur zufällig denselben Vornamen und Wohnort.
Jez Nicholson (2021-02-10 18:05:10+00:00): thanks for spotting that the road was too long...I turned it into a private driveway otherwise Amazon won't be able to find you... BTW you might want to add the address to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867672424
Jez Nicholson (2021-02-10 18:07:58+00:00): I think you meant the one just down the hill outside the architects https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/892736461 there isn't a second postbox is there?
Tomas Straupis (2021-01-16 12:14:47+00:00): What is being done here and why? Because I see a number of incorrect changes including this one.
Rico557 (2021-01-21 13:06:51+00:00): Laba diena Tomas and nice to meet you! I'm just resolved outdated tags and saw that the footprints of those buildings is not correct(machine import?). Than I changed footprints of buildings to one building with different levels parts(thru relations). But you have already reverted that... 
So, what kind of incorrect changes did you saw?
Tomas Straupis (2021-01-21 13:23:37+00:00): A lot of questions, so I will split them into several points :-)
1st point: iD is considered a very bad editor in Lithuania and its suggestions of "deprecated tags" are considered harmful by default. We will be introducing our own version of iD with correct tagging presets.
2nd point: there was incorrect relation for buildings created. iD is very bad at handling relations.
3rd point. If there are actually any deprecated/outdated tags we decide that in Lithuanian maillist and then update ALL occurrences at once in automated or semi-automated fashion.
4th point. Building footprints. There was no building import done in Lithuania. Initially we used Microsofts (Bing) ortophoto which is famous for extremely bad quality geocoordination (with photo being offset up to 20 meters). If buildings were initially vectorised before 2013 - they could be from Bing era. Later we introduced government ortophoto ORT10LT which is very precise, but it does not mean all buildings have been reviewed and corrected.
Warin61 (2022-04-21 04:58:50+00:00): Hi,
Jogging could be done along any foot path. 

What makes this path have special features for jogging? 

Is not jogging a form of running?
Davie Dean (2022-04-21 09:16:26+00:00): It's sign-posted as a jogging track.
aceman444 (2021-02-24 02:45:10+00:00): HI, please provide proper descriptions of changesets, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
a hundred changesets all with "#osmhr-project-11 #potres-kod-petrinje" aren't informational for others outside the #potres-kod-petrinje task. Thanks
Matija Nalis (2021-03-24 03:28:13+00:00): @ameman444 Just FYI, it is mapping using Aerial images of buildings and highways, due to  recent earthquakes in Croatia. More details available at https://tasks.osm-hr.org/project/11
aceman444 (2021-03-24 09:53:40+00:00): Thanks. Sad that the original author can't explain that. Anyway, it is still does not excuse generic changeset descriptions.
Hedaja (2021-01-16 11:36:06+00:00): Hi
thanks for your contribution.
It would be really helpful to specify what kind of shop it is and add more details to it (for example name, address, ...). The ID Editor should offer all kinds of shop presets if you search for them (for example search for bakery)
Here are some infos about shops in OSM
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

Happy mapping
-Christian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97599867
Hedaja (2021-01-16 11:32:05+00:00): Eintragung ist richtig so

Viel Spass beim weitermappen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97599912
Hedaja (2021-01-16 11:31:03+00:00): Your change is looking good.
Is the name usually written with capital letters (Perakam Church)?

-Christian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97599933
Hedaja (2021-01-16 11:29:20+00:00): Just been taking a lot at your change. Is this like a little street food store at the side of the road or a building?
If it's only a small shop I would map it as a single point. If it's a building, you probably wanna add building=yes and square it (by clicking on it and selecting the square option or by pressing Q)
Right now the tag amenity=cafe also suggest that you can sit down and eat there. If it's a shop for baked goods, I would use shop=bakery instead.

Happy mapping

-Christian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97599946
SIDHARTH AJ (2021-01-16 14:13:24+00:00): It's a bakery in a building
palkor (2021-01-16 11:44:41+00:00): Please disregard this change. Building number is incorrectly assigned. I've created a new corrected one in change set 97600829.
Frans S (2021-01-16 11:36:44+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for mapping 
Please don't connect nodes of adjacent buildings to eachother.
Please read this document as well
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
abakus_uploader (2021-01-16 23:33:11+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2021-01-16 23:33:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Dfaurekde (2021-01-17 08:46:15+00:00): I did not modify any address, only the opening_hours attribute.
Prt_An (2021-01-16 16:20:38+00:00): Ciao Leero999 la classificazione precedente rispettava la wiki di OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary) che attua una sorta di presunzione secondo cui le strade statali o regionali sono prevalentemente da considerasi primarie salvo evidenti eccezioni. "The "SSs" are mostly primary (...) SRs can be tagged as primary as well, if they have a relevant role in linking two major cities". Nel caso di specie quindi non vedo particolari preclusioni per quanto riguarda la qualificazione come primaria della Strada Tosco-Romagnola che per mole di traffico e per capacità di collegamento rispetta a pieno gli standard della strada primaria.
eggie (2021-01-16 12:40:21+00:00): Dag MeneerPeer...
Lijkt me dan prima gelukt.

MVG
eggie
frienlydisaster (2021-05-17 16:33:29+00:00): Ти чого перехід видалив, баобаб ти двадцять перший?
opencarpatia (2021-01-16 13:56:20+00:00): За яким "дебілом" ти тут вирівняв? Сам за собою?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190710310/history
olehz (2021-01-16 14:18:56+00:00): Я можу в рефлексію ;)
opencarpatia (2021-01-17 12:29:37+00:00): Ясно, значить таки дебіл.
eggie (2021-01-16 12:48:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-16 12:54:28+00:00): Dag Vincent,
De dubbele adres- en bedrijfsinfo heb ik verwijderd van het gebouw. office=company toegevoegd. Dan zal de naam renderen op de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-16 12:50:15+00:00): Bij OSM maken we gebruik van de adresmodes. Dus niet nogmaals de adres- en bedrijfsinfo op de gebouwomtrek zetten.
MVG
eggie
SHARCRASH (2021-01-16 13:38:50+00:00): fixed, the rendering seems coming back
VISHNU K C (2021-01-17 15:02:24+00:00): Square the corners of the temple and building using shortkey:Q......and if the building is of a girl's hostel then change the feature from college building to hostel....Happy mapping....#Naksha2021
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97603110
VISHNU K C (2021-01-17 15:02:25+00:00): Square the corners of the temple and building using shortkey:Q......and if the building is of a girl's hostel then change the feature from college building to hostel....Happy mapping....#Naksha2021
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97603110
confusedbuffalo (2021-03-07 17:34:44+00:00): And here and in other changesets you've added "footway"="footway=no" to a lot of ways. I'm not sure what you were aiming for with these, and they had a mixture of foot access tags set so I've simply removed the tag on all of the ways.
You can review my change here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100584689
SHARCRASH (2021-01-16 13:38:31+00:00): fixed
SHARCRASH (2021-01-16 13:39:00+00:00): the rendering seems coming back
eggie (2021-01-16 13:34:44+00:00): Misschien tourism = resort op het vlak? ipv commercial?
Het adres heb ik verwijderd.
eggie
eggie (2021-01-16 13:28:17+00:00): Svp geen adfesinfo toevoegen aan de gebouwomtrek. Gebruik de adresmode
mbg
eggie
eggie (2021-01-16 13:30:35+00:00): Dag Vincent. Svp niet dubbel taggen. 
Kijk in de wiki hoe een ijsbaan toe te voegen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dice_rink

mvg
eggie
Jacopo (2024-12-06 10:56:35+00:00): Ciao Pao869, mi potresti dare qualche dettaglio in più su questo luogo di culto che hai aggiunto? Mi pare strano che sia presente nel mezzo del parcheggio.
Grazie
Jacopo
eggie (2021-01-16 13:27:07+00:00): Dag Vincent
Svp geen bedrijfs en adresinfo toevoegen aan de gebouwomtrek.. Gebruik de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
VincentZzYes (2021-01-16 13:37:05+00:00): Ok, prima ... is mijn eeste gebruik en ben wellicht wat te enthousiast.
Al doende leert men.
Kwam er inderdaad achter dat ik als van toepassing ook een betere invulling kan selecteren bij een Punt.
Vanaf nu zal ik beter e.e.a. managen.
Echter wellicht heb ik in mijn enthousiasme nog en paar ongewenste invullingen gedaan.
eggie (2021-01-16 13:38:51+00:00): Vincent,
Laat je niet weerhouden door kritiek.
Vooral veel plezier met mappen.
MVG
eggie
VincentZzYes (2021-01-16 13:42:54+00:00): Dank
Gabriele Dri (2021-02-17 21:08:54+00:00): Ciao. Perchè hai cancellato il percorso all'interno dell'area pedonale? Così hai interrotto sia il percorso della Ciclovia Alpe Adria che della FVG1
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97604136
alessandrocarmeli (2021-02-20 20:41:02+00:00): chiedo scusa, l'ho ripristinato
Leo Slager (2021-01-17 14:54:30+00:00): Dag Mark,
Met het opsplitsen van De Molen heb je 13 routerelaties beschadigd.
wees voorzichtig met het splitsen van wegen. Als er routerelaties over die weg lopen gaat het altijd fout omdat de editor iD daar niet mee om kan gaan.
Als er routes lopen, vraag hulp aan een ervaren mapper.
frosm (2021-01-16 14:42:55+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
Peut-être avez vous lu que maps.me utilise openstreetmap pour la majoritée de ses données, et c'est dans celui-ci que votre contribution a été ajouté.
avec un tel nom, il serrait bien utile d'ajouter un moyen de contact :)
Bonne continuation
PVitt (2021-01-25 14:36:04+00:00): Hi K Hackett and thank you for participating in HOT. But I want to encourage you to learn some mapping basics at first: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
Feel free to ask any mapper for help, we are all eager to help new mappers finding their way into OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97604708
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-03 23:54:39+00:00): porque transformou isto em path? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/830590899/history
Vítor Dias (2022-09-04 13:37:29+00:00): Já não lembro mais, mas é possível que na época a rua não estivesse implantada.
blackboxlogic (2021-01-16 20:32:53+00:00): I checked the website you linked as a reference: https://catalog.archives.gov/id/88687705
and the name of this place doesn't have the word "Historical" in it. I also checked the wikipedia page and the name doesn't have the word "Historical" in it. I'm changing the names of these element to reflect the references I found. If you want to change them back, please provide a published reference showing that name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97605532
Hedaja (2021-01-16 17:31:49+00:00): Hi
I just looked at your changes.
I think you accidentally made the name longer than it is. Shouldn't it be just "Bamas Auditorium".
Since it says Google Search, I wanna also let you know that we can't take data from Google and put it into OSM For example it's not allowed to copy the address or other info from Google Maps.

I hope that helps. Happy Mapping
-Hedaja
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97605582
Hedaja (2021-01-16 17:34:17+00:00): Ohh and I also just saw, that you added it twice (first as a building area and now as a single point. If you have tagged it on the building outline, you don't need to make and extra point again. So you can delete this one and change the name on the area.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97605582
Puxan (2021-02-10 11:40:29+00:00): Por favor @kibira,  cuando cambies el tipo de vía de no clasificada a otra, vigila que no queden otras vías incoherentes como un segmento de no clasificada en medio de un sendero.  Esto es fácil de ver si usas JOSM con un estilo de coloreado denominado HDM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97605716
Hedaja (2021-01-16 17:26:13+00:00): HI
I just looked at your changes. I found one big thing. You accidentally turned the node for the town (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1465969146) into a market place. I fixed that for you.

There is also a small problem with your use of operator. The key is used for specific people/organizations/companies. If you wanna tag public (state/municpal) or private ownership, you can use the key "ownership" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ownership).

Happy mapping
-Hedaja
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97605756
VISHNU K C (2021-01-17 14:52:19+00:00): Maintain the shape as visible in the imagery....try to use maxar imagery....Also avoid naming the feature in small letters or capital letters only as it will be shown as an error...happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97605793
SHARCRASH (2021-01-16 14:05:30+00:00): + tags corrected
Hedaja (2021-01-16 17:17:40+00:00): hi
your change looks good.

Happy mapping
-Hedaja
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97606060
Hedaja (2021-01-16 17:16:26+00:00): Hi
this looks and sounds like a gas station. Pumping stations in OSM are facilities where substances get pumped around (for example into pipelines).
If this is a place where you fill up the gas tank for your car-bike, then gas station is the right term to search for in the editor (or add it manually as amenity=gas_station). Here are some additional information about adding more details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel

Another thing is that you should square off the area. Simply select the area and press Q. This will make it rectangular.

Hope this helps. Happy mapping
-Hedaja
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97606181
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-16 18:50:09+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
Please check it...
Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97606432
eggie (2021-01-16 15:09:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Kleine aanpassing:
De info heb ik samengevoegd met adresnode nr 9
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Hedaja (2021-01-16 17:10:28+00:00): Hi
soweit ich das beurteilen kann, sehen deine Änderungen gut aus. 

Viel Spaß weiterhin
-Hedaja
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97606763
dpdani (2021-01-16 14:45:58+00:00): I requested a review because this is my first contribution.
Hedaja (2021-01-16 17:07:19+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM,

your changes are looking good. One thing you could improve is to make buildings rectangular, if they are in reality. For example the church that you added 

In ID editor (the  one you used) you can do so by right-clicking on the area and then select the square icon (should say something like "make rectangular" when you hover over it) or you can simply press Q.

Happy Mapping
-Hedaja
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97606934
eggie (2021-01-16 15:30:58+00:00): Dag Jan..

access=yes is default  Dat hoef je niet te taggen
Een weg naar een huis kun je als access=private taggen ipv access=no

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=97607016

MVG
eggie
Hedaja (2021-01-16 17:02:28+00:00): hi
sieht soweit gut aus. Wichtig wäre noch die Nummer der Packstation (hier also vermutlich ref=148) und die Postleitzahl (addr:postcode=...). Wenn du willst kannst du auch den Typ mit type=* angeben. 
Hier eine Übersicht zu den Packstationen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Packstation

Viel Spaß beim mappen
-Hedaja
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97607192
EneaSuper (2021-01-16 15:44:31+00:00): Ciao Lucio, sei sicuro di quello che hai fatto? Mi pare una modifica un po' estrema, e il nuovo multipoligono non ha dei tag...
LucioGE (2021-01-16 16:01:33+00:00): Mi fa piacere che ci sia chi controlla...ho trovato degli errori grossolani nella mappatura e ho tracciato una bozza provvisoria con Vespucci, adesso sistemo con JOSM
EneaSuper (2021-01-16 16:07:02+00:00): Sono sempre attivo, magari passivamente ma il territorio lo controllo 😆

Comunque ok, buon lavoro 🙂
Hedaja (2021-01-16 16:54:16+00:00): Hi, from what I can tell, you changes are looking good.

Happy mapping
-Hedaja
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97607546
user_5359 (2021-01-18 18:39:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
FasterTracker (2021-06-07 19:07:44+00:00): Atenção que os sites que estão mencionados não têm uma licensa de dados compatível com o OSM. 

Ambos dizem expressamente, nos seus próprios sites, que detêm todos os direitos relativamente face a esses dados e que a partilha com base nesses dados, estes facultados nesses sites, é só permite com autorização dos mesmos.

Desse modo, como é que  obteve a informação das paragens em questão?
Sérgio R Loureiro (2021-06-10 10:30:36+00:00): Quais sites? Eu não referi sites nenhuns. Eu passei lá fisicamente e sei onde são as paragens, até porque consigo pôr-me de minha casa aí num instante.
FasterTracker (2021-06-11 02:06:03+00:00): Os sites que se encontram descritos na etiqueta description=* ,esta adicionada na versão 2 desta paragem ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8325956923/history ) a qual está integrada numa changeset que fez.

Os sites que estão referidos na etiqueta referida acima são o da operadora ( http://www.jj-santoantonio.pt/pt/Rede ) e a da aplicação Moovit ( https://moovitapp.com/lisboa-2460/lines/SAB/16680788/4214561/pt?epochDay=18644&customerId=4908&ref=2&poiType=line ).

Como referi anteriormente, estas fontes de dados não têm uma licença compatível com o OSM (salvo haja permissão dada para tal). Isto é comprovado ao consultar a secção "Termos e Condições" de cada um dos sites.
FasterTracker (2021-06-11 02:09:24+00:00): Como foi feito um survey no local mapeado, creio que não haja problema em manter a informação introduzida.

Peço só que remova as referências aos sites mencionados se a fonte principal for de facto um survey.

Obrigado pela atenção e bom mapeamento,
FT
eggie (2021-01-16 16:10:28+00:00): Dag Vincent.. Niet het gebouw zelf gebruiken behalve. Zet de info op de adresnode. 
name=  alleen gebruiken als het de naam van een gebouw is zoals bij paleizen, kerken en monumentale panden.
Kijk je nog even?

Op een adresnode wel een combinatie maken met bv office=company  man_made=works  .. e.d. 

MVG
eggie
VincentZzYes (2021-01-16 19:55:09+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Volgens mij ben ik nu op de beterende weg.
Heb overal de vermeldingen op gebouw omtrekken verwijdert.
En toegepast op de adres node.
Tevens betere categorie kunnen vinden bij de vermelding.
eggie (2021-01-16 20:20:58+00:00): Top!
Leo Slager (2021-01-20 11:27:43+00:00): Lijkt mij helemaal in overeenstemming met de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
Hedaja (2021-01-16 16:52:28+00:00): Hi,
 Your changes are looking good.

Happy Mapping
-Hedaja
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97608717
lucadelu (2021-01-21 11:10:52+00:00): Nel campo name va messo solo il nome proprio di un oggetto non il termine generale pino, è meglio rimuoverlo.
Alessandro_Ferrante (2021-01-21 15:27:11+00:00): OK, ricevuto, provvedo a modificarlo
ivanbranco (2021-01-21 20:25:06+00:00): Intervengo con un suggerimento, se conosci la specie esatta puoi inserirla con il tag species: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:species

per esempio species=Pinus mugo
FasterTracker (2021-06-07 18:58:07+00:00): Cuidado que as etiquetas name=* não devem conter redundância como "Paragem de Autocarro" quando existem outras etiquetas a descrever o mesmo.

Outro erro que cometeste aqui é descrever a paragem como public_transport=station invés de public_transport=platform + bus=yes

Se tiveres alguma dúvida podes perguntar-me e/ou consultar a wiki
Hedaja (2021-01-16 16:50:37+00:00): hi
your fixes are looking good. Thanks for catching those errors.

Happy mapping
-Hedaja
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97609324