piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2021-12-11 01:20:59+00:00): "Null Island" exists in databases, but not in the real world...
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-12-11 17:56:49+00:00): Many suburbs/localities also does not exist as some physical entity - but solely as shared knowledge that name refers to some specific area or location.

Many names refer to something no longer existing or something that never existed.
walkingsophie (2022-01-10 00:09:43+00:00): Currently discussion in the mailing list is happening here https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-January/thread.html
pio2_122 (2021-08-23 10:31:01+00:00): Brak źródła - do wycofania.
cyganka (2021-08-23 11:22:57+00:00): http://bip.rbip.wzp.pl/artykul/plan-zagospodarowania-przestrzennego-wojewodztwa-zachodniopomorskiego-2020-r
pio2_122 (2021-08-23 11:36:17+00:00): Plan zagospodarowania przestrzennego to nie projekt budowlany, więc ma charakter wyłącznie poglądowy.


„Ustalenia planu nie stanowią prawa miejscowego i tym samym nie naruszają autonomii gmin w zakresie gospodarki przestrzennej...”

Plan ten nie spełnia więc warunków dodawania projektowanych dróg do bazy OSM:
„W przypadku narysowania takiej drogi zawsze podaj źródła potwierdzające, że ta droga rzeczywiście ma zostać zbudowana i że taka ma być jej geometria.”
„Zauważ, że ogólnie w OpenStreetMap mapujemy obiekty fizyczne, które są weryfikowalne na ziemi. Proponowane obiekty, które nie są widoczne w terenie, powinny być zatem odwzorowywane tylko w wyjątkowych przypadkach i po dyskusji z odpowiednią społecznością OSM. Inaczej mogą zostać usunięte z powodu braku możliwości weryfikacji.”
„Skasowanie drogi highway=proposed, w przypadku której nie można ustalić, że ma rzeczywiście być zbudowana, jest prawidłowe.”

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=proposed?uselang=pl
Frans S (2021-08-23 13:54:48+00:00): HI. I reviewed this task as well.
You mapped a few building to big. and overlooked some others.
Please take a close look (zoom in as far as possible ) and scan the area.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110098423
mavl (2021-08-26 16:20:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110297264 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5292].
Frans S (2021-08-23 13:52:06+00:00): Hello. You asked for a review. Welcom to mappers world. 
This mapping consist out of 2 buildings. 1 small and another bigger one. Please map them individally next time. Also square your rectangular buildings with the Q key
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110098675
nevw (2021-08-23 09:44:08+00:00): This is an operational map and not in need of your personal snapchat location in the school grounds....deleted.
Frans S (2021-08-23 13:42:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110098959
nevw (2021-08-23 09:47:40+00:00): Is this path really a named and signed path or just some path you'd like your name on.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
Frans S (2021-08-23 13:41:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110098974
Frans S (2021-08-23 13:41:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110098974
Frans S (2021-08-23 10:30:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110099052
Frans S (2021-08-23 13:48:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110099627
Frans S (2021-08-23 13:47:45+00:00): Hi. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I reviewed a number of tasks you have mapped and your mappings are quite good.
There is no need to ask for a review. If you can keep your quality standard on this level.
Best regard
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110099730
eggie (2021-08-23 08:55:48+00:00): Yep.. nu geen foutmelding meer.
gr eggie
BikeForestExplorer (2023-09-04 07:26:09+00:00): Помітив, що колись ви поставили теги Smoothness=bad на highway=primary, але не проставили surface=asphalt.
Це створює проблеми для велосипедних маршрутизаторів при прокладанні шосейних маршрутів. Зазвичай вони просто ведуть по дорогам з найвищим пріорітетом, вважаючи, що ну тут то точно асфальт повинен бути. Але коли бачать, що дорога bad без вказання, що це асфальт, то вважають, що це грунтовка, і ведуть бо будь яким дорогам, аби не по цій. Тому, першочергово треба вказувати саме surface
BikeForestExplorer (2023-09-04 07:27:31+00:00): ...і це не вам)))
flohoff (2021-09-17 10:31:10+00:00): Moin,
du hast hier den weg als "Private" markiert - das sehe ich anders. Es gibt ein allgemeines Betretungsrecht der freien Natur. Das steht dem gerade ziemlich entgegen. 

Wir kommst du drauf das das private ist?

Flo
haegarx (2021-09-17 12:55:00+00:00): Weil ich mit dem Eigentümer und Pächter gesprochen habe.
haegarx (2021-09-17 12:55:56+00:00): Es ist kein Wald sondern ein Spargel-und ein Getreidefeld. Dort gilt das nicht.
flohoff (2021-09-17 14:47:31+00:00): Das gilt nicht nur für Wald sondern für die freie Natur. Also z.b. auch für Felder nach der Ernte etc.

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bnatschg_2009/__59.html

Und wir taggen ja das was da ist. Stehen da Schilder? Muss ja jeder nachvollziehen können was wir da so taggen.

Und nur weil das ein "Privatweg" ist heisst das nicht das es nicht betreten werden darf. Privatweg heisst das die Haftung jemand anders als die öffentliche Hand hat.

Flo
haegarx (2021-09-17 17:06:59+00:00): Naja, die Landwirte hier in der Gegend sind jedenfalls über OSM ziemlich sauer. Die vielen Radler (meist MTB) nerven. Viele wollen nun sogar bisher geduldete Wege dichtmachen.

Hier ist aber definitiv kein Weg. Nur Treckerspuren vom Ackern den Reiter vom örtlichen Verein nutzen. Und MTBler die sich das zutrauen oder Antrieb haben.

Kannst gern mal mit denen reden ...
ALu68 (2021-08-23 20:14:29+00:00): Hello xkuboini,

Please do not create too much nodes for a short way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975600481 - no intermediate nodes on a straight path.

Keep a straight path straight.

Regards. Andre
xkuboini (2021-09-10 08:43:09+00:00): Hi Andre,
Thanks for letting me know and making the changes. I will make sure to keep this in my mind for future edits. Happy to have got insights from you.
Regards,
xkuboini
eggie (2023-04-06 09:18:58+00:00): Hoi Wim... Er wordt volop gesloopt. Kan dat vaccinatiecentrum weg?
Ik heb wat sloopwerkzaamheden uitgevoerd. Wellcht is er nog veel meer weg? 

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2021-08-23 12:50:31+00:00): Each rectangular building needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor.
Most of the buildings are strickt rectangular.
 A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
When parts of a building are hidden by trees, extrapolate the rooflines rather than following the treelines.

See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg

Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/

Best regards and success with future mappings
Frans S (2021-08-23 13:43:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110103184
Frans S (2021-08-23 10:08:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110103345
zluuzki (2021-09-06 15:02:46+00:00): Hello, please make sure that your changesets don't cover the whole world. Something like that makes using the "History" tab pretty pointless. Thanks!
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-02 03:35:35+00:00): Hi zluuzki,

thanks for this information. I change my workflows to split those changes in sets which are group by cities or regions, but in any case by countries.

Greetings
Chriss
DressyPear4 (2021-08-23 14:00:28+00:00): Olá, não adicione nomes genéricos, use o campo "descrição"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110104374
jmty8 (2021-08-23 09:50:06+00:00): Removed broken role location_hint according to wiki.
n34s (2021-10-04 18:04:46+00:00): please check note 2881011: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2881011
eggie (2021-08-23 11:01:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

feedback .. Die fietsroutes bewerken is een aparte tak van sport. Dat kan helaas niet met editor iD en ook niet zonder de nodige ervaring. Ik kijk zo even naar de routerelaties.
Bweter is het dan om een opmerking op de kaart te plaatsen. Dan pakt een ervaren routemapper het wel op.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
jakecopp (2021-11-25 23:41:21+00:00): Hello, I drive on this road a lot and it's not a toll road - it turns into a toll road west of the Marsh st Intersection (to the left). Could you explain why you tagged it as such? Thanks :)
aharvey (2021-11-26 03:02:54+00:00): I've reverted this changeset, resolving the conflicts to remove the toll on this section of the M5/General Holmes Drive.
eggie (2021-08-23 11:09:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-08-23 11:05:20+00:00): Ik zal even vragen of routeexpert Dvdhoven kijkt voordat ik iets gaa terugdraaien. 
Wellicht is hij al het repareren geslagen en dan levert dat een 'conflict' op.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-23 14:41:09+00:00): Je info (PB)   heb ik doorgestuurd naar dvdhoven. Hij zal het verder oppakken. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-23 11:12:06+00:00): BMoor Even maar hier niet verder proberen te herstellen.. Er wordt eerst even gekeken anders wordt reverten steeds lastiger.

MVG
eggie
Hanan Tikveša (2021-08-23 13:44:27+00:00): stop it!
SekeRob (2021-08-23 15:05:49+00:00): Why everyone has to see this change set between Hudson Bay and Java Indonesia, beats me, but it seems again to originate in Die Heimat deriving from the German language being used in the commentary. Let me surprise you: If you want to map international, use English, but preferably, do it on a country by country basis. Keine interesse es zu sehen in meine locale history.

TIA
Kovoschiz (2021-08-24 00:01:40+00:00): @SekeRob  @ Hanan Tikveša 
This should be reported to OSMAnd.
eggie (2021-08-23 11:19:52+00:00): Het is niet duidelijk wat je hebt veranderd.
Vraag anders even advies vaan de voorgaande mapper JeroenvanderGun

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110105841

	
MVG
eggie
haacee (2021-08-23 12:41:58+00:00): The deleted section (510565252) has attribute:lanes to be 3 wher this in fact is only 2. This attribute was set by http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:It%27s_so_funny

To my knowledge no attributes for the section that was deleted are different from the adjacent sections.
As I may have missed some a review was requested
Leo Slager (2021-08-23 18:32:45+00:00): Op dat deel was terecht lanes=3 getagd. Dat is namelijk het deel waar de uitvoegstrook ligt naast de 2 stroken van de hoofdrijbaan.
De changeset moet dus worden reverted. De route app bevat dus kennelijk een fout of kan niet omgaan met de uitvoegstrook.
Leo Slager (2021-08-23 18:35:57+00:00): turn:lanes=none|none|slight_right was dus wel degelijk correct getagd.
Leo Slager (2021-08-23 18:40:05+00:00): reverted with my changeset 110132528
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-30 07:53:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172839236/history  - wait, how something may be zone:traffic=NL:urban and maxspeed=20 ?
Владимир К (2022-01-11 19:15:17+00:00): не надо удалять точку ЖД станции с путей. 
пожалуйста, не делайте то, чего не знаете. прежде чем что-то удалять, ознакомьтесь с существующими схемами тегирования 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations

откатываю
Lucifer Kinoff (2022-01-12 05:49:57+00:00): A node on a track way should be tagged as railway=stop to mark the estimate point at which the actual train stops.
Владимир К (2022-01-12 06:13:38+00:00): что вы хотите этой цитатой сказать? там так и было, пока вы не удалили одну из точек. и сейчас вы удалили одну и поменяли теги у другой. не надо так делать, всё было верно до вас
Lucifer Kinoff (2022-01-12 10:40:37+00:00): Ж.д. станция и место остановки - совсем не одно и то же (очень мягко сказано!). К слову, ж.д. станция и вокзал на этой станции - тоже две большие разницы. У них даже названия могут не совпадать. Пример: Ладожский вокзал в городе-герое Санкт-Петербурге расположен в границах ж.д. станции Дача Долгорукова и является частью этой станции. Точки остановки ж.д. составов на разных путях могут находиться в совершенно разных местах, да и попробуйте определить эту точку, если длина состава - под километр. У железных дорожников даже знак специальный имеется: "Остановка локомотива" ("Остановка первого вагона" - для электропоездов), и знаки эти ставятся НА КАЖДОМ из путей, где останавливаются пассажирские составы. Учите ПТЭ (Правила технической эксплуатации железных дорог РФ) и да будет вам щастье! Так что вандалом в данном случае являетесь вы (в полный рост)!
Владимир К (2022-01-12 11:12:35+00:00): да, разные вещи. и вы берете одну из них и зачем-то удаляете, поменяв неверно теги и сдвинув на место удаленной не то что надо. пожалуйста разберитесь со схемой тегирования прежде чем что-то удалять
ivanbranco (2021-08-23 16:47:33+00:00): Ciao alpigraie, 

potete rispondere per favore ai commenti nei changeset precedenti? Vi è già stato fatto notare dallo user canfe una valorizzazione errata del tag stars, in questo changeset per esempio avete inserito "stars=Informazione non reperibile".
edvac (2021-09-01 14:18:29+00:00): Caro alpigraie:

Abbiamo ricevuto una lamentela sulla scarsa mappatura da parte tua al DWG, e questo è il terzo changeset in cui un utente ti chiede di rispondere alle sue domande, senza alcun feedback finora.

Per favore, dacci la tua opinione sui problemi segnalati da questo utente ivanbranco, e anche sulle domande dell'utente canfe nei seguenti 2 changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109928109
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109874960

Grazie mille in anticipo,

Tradotto con www.DeepL.com/Translator (versione gratuita)

Dear alpigraie:

We've received a complaint about poor mapping by you at the DWG, and this is the third changeset where a user asks you to answer their questions, with no feedback so far.

Please, give us your opinion about the issues pointed by this user ivanbranco, and also about the questions of user canfe in the following 2 changesets:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109928109
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109874960

Thank you very much in advance,

Rafael Avila Coya
OSM Foundation - Data Working Group
alpigraie (2021-09-16 07:33:50+00:00): Buongiorno a tutti,
chiedo scusa per la risposta tardiva.
Allora si, nel momento in cui sono stati evidenziati questi problemi abbiamo subito interrotto il caricamento dei dati.
Il caricamento che stavamo effettuando stava avvenendo in collaborazione con il GAL Valli di Lanzo, Ceronda e Casternone dopo un lungo dibattito a cui ha partecipato anche Marco Brancolini al fine di implementare i dati delle strutture presenti sul territorio GAL. Dopo i primi caricamenti, anche grazie ai vostri commenti, ci siamo resi conto che i caricamenti non erano idonei e perciò ci siamo subito interrotti e abbiamo ripreso il dibattito su come poter aggiornare i dati in modo conforme alle regole di OSM.
Grazie per la collaborazione. Cordialmente.
canfe (2021-09-16 17:01:35+00:00): Dato che i dati non sono, come giustamente riconoscete, idonei e gli errori attualmente presenti in mappa molti, io passerei ad un revert la prossima settimana.
Inoltre non avete mai spiegato come mai il tag stars ha come valore "Informazione non reperibile" dato che la fonte è "conoscenza diretta".
O la fonte è un'altra?
edvac (2021-09-17 09:10:21+00:00): Chiariamo se i dati contengono dati protetti da copyright, perché in tal caso potremmo aver bisogno di "redact" i dati (un revert non sarebbe sufficiente).

Rafael Avila Coya, a nome del DWG
canfe (2021-09-17 17:18:09+00:00): Caro Rafael , per quanto il changeset affermi che la fonte è "conoscenza diretta". Lascio al DWG indicare quale opzione seguire.
-----
Dear Raphael, as far as the changeset states the source is "knowledge". I leave to the DWG to state which option to follow.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-22 14:00:48+00:00): This edit was reverted.

Please, do not make remote edits like this where it is likely that you damage data.

On what you base your claim that this medicines are recycled?
mueschel (2021-10-22 14:24:00+00:00): There is no claim at all, it is the documented tag *, described as "Expired drugs. Container available generally in pharmacies."
Drugs will never be recycled anywhere, so there can't be any confusing about what happens with them.

* Yes, I confused "drugs" and "medicines", so this should be fixed.
bxl-forever (2021-08-26 13:34:00+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for this, I didn’t know the community decided to change it into BE:cyclestreet.  But it makes more sense, indeed.
Thibault Rommel (2021-08-26 21:55:26+00:00): Indeed, it makes it more in-line with cyclestreey=yes which we already use, plus the usage wasn't very high anyway.
I did this whilst I was cleaning up the speed limit related tags in Belgium (source:maxspeed, zone:traffic, zone:maxspeed and maxspeed:type) for example by eliminate the generic source:maxspeed=BE:* tags as well, by replacing them with their regional BE-VLG, BE-WAL and BE-BRU tags to better reflect the differences in default speed limits in the 3 regions.
E de Wit (2021-08-23 15:18:23+00:00): Hi,

You changed the building type for this building to building=hospital. I can't imagine that being the correct tag.

-E de Wit
clic (2021-08-23 15:34:18+00:00): Hi,
It is a building of KNMR Lifeguard. Streetcomplete App does not have other tags for medical buildings.

-clic
E de Wit (2021-08-23 16:05:58+00:00): Ah that explains, there are multiple tags useful for tagging such a building. Only the building=lifeguard_tower has been used 60 times around the world. (If it's a tower of some sorts) At the moment there's no clear tag if it's not a lifeguard_tower.

There is no problem with keeping the tag as building=yes in case you're not sure. There are alternative tags available for mapping a building for lifeguards:

lifeguard=base
emergency=lifeguard
operator=KNMR

-E de Wit
clic (2021-08-24 11:37:43+00:00): OK, these tags are not available in Streetcomplete App. This might be the reason, why they are rarely used. Operator ist KNRM not KNMR. Sorry for the typo.
E de Wit (2021-08-24 17:09:07+00:00): The documentation for lifeguards only got approved a couple of months ago so usage will increase in due time.

Based on satellite imegary it seems like the building is portable and goes to storage when the season is over.
With the platform and windows at the front on the 1st floor a lifeguard_tower looks like a good fit.

Added/changed tags:
building=lifeguard_tower
emergency=lifeguard
lifeguard=tower
name=KNRM lifeguard
operator=KNRM
seasonal=yes

Changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110185570
user_5359 (2021-08-24 06:37:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on your way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975630528: The only key is "gpx:name", a useless information for OSM. Please add the type of the way.
user_5359 (2021-08-24 06:39:35+00:00): I didn't see that this is your first entry in OSM: Welcome to OSM!
Woazboat (2022-04-08 01:22:55+00:00): Dieser revert wurde in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119448104 wieder teilweise rückgängig gemacht um Daten die unnötigerweise durch den vollständigen revert zerstört wurden wieder herzustellen
Duja (2021-08-25 14:47:02+00:00): Ja se mučio i razdvajao landuse duž međe, a ti pomeri među. I to na našu štetu, kuku nesrećo. :(
Branko Kokanovic (2021-08-25 16:32:26+00:00): Hajde pogledaću večeras da pomerim landuse da se poklapa bolje sa granicom. Ali ne bih da pomeram granicu nazad jer su ovo RGZ podaci (verovatnije je da je prethodno ucrtana granica bila loša:D). Jel ti to ok? Ako vidiš opet nešto slično, javi mi!
Duja (2021-08-26 07:48:56+00:00): Ma ne moraš, nije to ništa mnogo bitno. Vratiću se na to jednog dana. Verujem da je granica bila loša, šta sad da radimo, nesreća na poslu.
Branko Kokanovic (2021-08-26 10:06:50+00:00): Evo ispravio na https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110277255. Ali evo gledam ove dve sume - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897186479 i nije mi jasno bas sto si npr. razdvajao sumu po granici, nije da suma ima nacionalnost. Kolliko vidim na satelitu, to je jedna suma, nije deljena na granici?
Duja (2021-08-26 10:19:26+00:00): Čisto iz praktičnih razloga, da može da se čisto "iseče" državna mapa, i da prostorni upiti (npr. koliko je pod šumama u Srbiji) budu lakši. A najviše zato da mapiranje u jednoj državi ne pravi probleme u drugoj.
Dodko (2021-08-23 15:15:13+00:00): Z tej adresy v bode čo bola na bytovke sa mohol uroviť zároveň aj vchod a nie samostatný bod vchod a samostatný bod adresa.