piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
uks (2018-02-12 15:17:05+00:00): А чем building=school плох? Не нужно рисовать под рендер: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C#.D0.9D.D0.B5_.D1.80.D0.B8.D1.81.D1.83.D0.B9.D1.82.D0.B5_.D0.B4.D0.BB.D1.8F_.D0.BA.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.81.D0.BE.D1.82.D1.8B_.28.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B4.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B5.D1.80.D0.B0.29
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-09-10 09:03:48+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please avoid adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
SHARCRASH (2018-06-21 21:36:14+00:00): Hi HAL, did the crossing that was here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/321536339 (also visible on any Geoportail.lu image sat.) moved where you placed it here 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1555778496 ? Some months ago, i had a ride there and  i don't recall any changes of the trail and your edit is 10 months old. Can you clear the situation please? Thanks! :)
HAL_lux (2018-06-26 17:20:48+00:00): Hi,

You´re a day late and a dollar short, aren´t you? That´s almost 1 year ago I did modify the way so if you think that I´m wrong please feel free to modify it :)

Btw. You were right on that way in Boulaide, so I´ve deleted mine..
SHARCRASH (2018-06-27 12:49:06+00:00): Well, i don't know if you're wrong and i said i don't recall any change yet i'm unsure, that's why i'm asking you for the reason why the change. ;) OK I'll change it then since i don't recall any change, the image sat shows the crossway being on the other place and this GPS heatmap shows the path being different : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GPWaGPfp1d4a2OM9qc4YQSI6fD665_a_/view?usp=sharing
Constable (2017-08-21 17:51:48+00:00): Ciao, guarda che hai aggiunto una fonte d'avqua che era già mappata.
Questo è il tuo nodo http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5039624466, questo quello già presente http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2973545391
Per favore rimuovi il tuo appena puoi, perché adesso risultano due fonti guardando la mappa.
Grazie, ciao
GerdP (2017-09-04 09:08:44+00:00): HI!
Ive noticed that you changed a few footbridges crossing MEX 15 from highway=footway to the (wrong) highway=crossing + traffic_calming=table
What was the reason?
hgocat (2017-09-04 14:17:38+00:00): Hi, GerdP!
I think that is a error because in the spanish version it have a label "Cruce peatonal elevado" derived or that has as root the label "crossing" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway=crossing). This label is same to "Sendero peatonal". This generate a ambiguity in México. To the areas where pedestrians can cross the streets, in Mexico we call them "cruce peatonal" and when they are above the street we named them "puente peatonal". That's why I thought that's the label ("cruce peatonal elevado") that best describes the structure.
GerdP (2017-09-04 14:26:09+00:00): Hi hgocat!
Yes, I found several places where mappers made the same mistake, all used ID. 
I've opened a ticket for ID and will post a link to this changeset.
DavidKewley (2017-08-17 05:25:40+00:00): This changeset changed a street to a business. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51193116.
BikePC (2017-10-14 10:37:08+00:00): Ook paden tussen tennisbanen en sportvelden - zolang ze liggen op prive terrein zie ik als overbodige micromapping.
Math1985 (2017-10-14 12:02:51+00:00): Juist het feit dat die paden niet openbaar zijn (daarom zijn ze grijs) vind ik nuttige informatie, dat maakt het voor iedereen duidelijk dat je niet tussen de velden door af kan snijden (wat je wel zou kunnen denken als je op de satellietfoto kijkt).
BikePC (2017-10-15 14:03:55+00:00): Wie kijkt er nou op die satellietfoto's? Alleen de OSM mappers! Wat geeft het aan de gebruikers van OSM-kaarten nou voor meerwaarde om zoiets te mappen? Ik blijf het overkill vinden en onnodige detaillering.
BikePC (2017-09-30 13:12:31+00:00): De twee gebouwen van SV Oosterheem hebben elk de verenigingsnaam op de gebouwcontour staan. Dit komt op mij over als overkill en stel daarom voor om alleen de naam "SV Oosterheem" op het hoofdgebouw '7A' te laten staan. Mee eens?
Math1985 (2017-09-30 21:00:07+00:00): Mee eens, aangepast!
Matthew Darwin (2017-08-17 03:07:48+00:00): Reminder to add French names when you are adding new roads.  I will add this one.
LogicalViolinist (2017-08-17 03:34:58+00:00): I usually do, but was pressed for time.
DenisCarriere (2017-08-17 20:29:34+00:00): Bad James! lol
literan (2017-08-17 13:20:22+00:00): статусы дорог в OSM назначаются не в соответствии с ведомственной принадлежностью или каких-то чиновничьих классификаций, а исходя из их значимости в дорожной сети. Поэтому вашу правку я вынужден откатить
ealeks (2017-08-17 14:39:49+00:00): Я согласен с тем, что принадлежность большой роли не играет. Но в данном случае участок развязки явно выше по статусу, чем прилегающие дороги слева и справа. О чём свидетельствует расширение, качество асфальта, шумозащитные экраны и т. д. и т. п. В данном случае, развязка явно целиком относится к более значимой дороге, чем к менее значимой. Однако возражать не буду.
literan (2017-08-17 14:53:34+00:00): ширина дороги, качество покрытия, наличие экранов - все это отображается в соответствующих тегах. Класс дороги, повторюсь, - только из значимости данной дороги в транспортной системе (аналогия - обозначения дорог в Атласе автодорог СССР). Т.е. даже если дорога - грунтовка с грязной жижей, в которой тонут автомобили, но соединяет субъекты федерации - то это trunk (пример - трасса "Лена"). Такие вот правила в RU-OSM, приняты голосованием. В Польше, например, не так.
ealeks (2017-08-17 16:18:29+00:00): Вопрос же не в этом, а в том, к какой из двух пересекаемых дорог относится развязка со всеми её съездами. Надо действовать в рамках правил ruOSM
literan (2017-08-17 16:57:20+00:00): Но вы-то перетегировали не только съезды, но и само Можайское шоссе. А съезды - вопрос более обсуждаемый, но есть консенсус, что тегировать по "нижней" дороге (см. все развязки Москвы).
ealeks (2017-08-17 20:50:40+00:00): Ок. Собственно, я не собирался трогать дороги федерального значения, но здесь развязка попала в фокус. Хорошо, съезды по "нижней".
Nakaner (2017-09-19 19:40:52+00:00): Hallo warangal,

anstatt die gesamte Anlage mit power=generator zu taggen, ist das korrekte Vorgehen hier, sie mit power=plant zu taggen und die einzelnen Reihen als power=generator zu erfassen. Es gibt zwar viele falsche Anlagen, die genau so erfasst sind, wie du sie erfasst hast, aber das soll dich nicht daran hindern, sie korrekt zu erfassen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
warangal (2018-10-18 18:07:24+00:00): Das wäre aber viel Arbeit! Vielleicht mache ich mich noch einmal daran.
mhfod83 (2017-08-22 06:23:38+00:00): ممكن اسمك علمني كيف أضيف بلدتي
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-08-17 13:30:06+00:00): A nazwa ulicy w adresie? A miejscowość?
Chrapek (2017-08-17 13:58:33+00:00): To są domki kempingowe. Miejsce nazywa się "Piotrowa Polana".
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-08-17 14:10:04+00:00): Dzięki za info.
mavl (2017-08-17 14:03:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
Вы добавили название для компании на английском языке 'Ing.Service'. Названия на языках, отличных от местных, используются только тогда, когда эти названия известны в этих языках и общеприняты. Вы уверены, что название этой компании известно за границей (например, в США или Великобритании) и именно в таком виде используется?  
  
Также номер телефона нужно указывать в международном формате, например +7 3452 508040  [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone].  
  
Чтобы ответить на это сообщение, вам нужно перейти по ссылке на сайт OpenStreetMap. Затем войти под своей учётной записью и написать комментарий на сайте в пустое поле в разделе "Обсуждение".  
  
Если у вас возникли какие-либо вопросы, то вы можете задать их на форуме [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21].  
На форуме есть тема о Тюменской области [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=7083].
Self-Perfection (2017-08-17 08:28:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы повторяете при редактировании ошибку, которую я вам уже вам описывал в комментариях к правке https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50977890

Вот вы создали ворота https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5039767796 Сейчас она принадлежит только дороге https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514278627 Но ворота - это пересечение забора и дороги, должно принадлежать обеим линиям.
chillly (2017-08-16 19:43:58+00:00): Hello, 
Someone who was adding population numbers has just been blocked. So is this a way to circumvent being blocked, or are you a genuine new editor? 

Is the 2011 census data released under an open licence? Is there information about this?
Dr Mark (2017-08-16 20:06:04+00:00): Hi Chillly,

I had no idea that anyone had been blocked for adding population numbers. I was looking for ways to use OpenStreetMap for Parish Council and local political work, and was trying to find a way to display ward and district boundaries. While doing that I saw that there was no population data for Middleton Cheney (my village) and I'd seen it on the Wikipedia page and local District Council plan, so added it in, hoping that it might be useful.

2011 Census data can be access from Nomis: https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/

It states that the data is available for free, but I suspect that that means free as in beer rather than speech. There is a copyright notice: https://www.nomisweb.co.uk/home/copyright.asp

which states that "Under the terms of the Open Government Licence (OGL) and UK Government Licensing Framework (launched 30 September 2010), anyone wishing to use or re-use ONS material, whether commercially or privately, may do so freely without a specific application for a licence, subject to the conditions of the OGL and the Framework."

I got the figure the from the local plan Parish data for Middleton: http://www.southnorthants.gov.uk/Parish-Data-Middleton-Cheney.pdf

It also appears on the Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middleton_Cheney

Kind regards,
Mark.
Dr Mark (2017-08-16 20:13:02+00:00): The Open Government Licence can be viewed here: http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
Mark.
chillly (2017-08-16 20:13:18+00:00): Thanks for the reply. OGL is fine, but oddly wikipedia isn't always a safe source - we don't know where that came from. Your edit looks fine based on OGL.

The parish boundaries for much of GB have been added, it looks like your village has too. The purple dotted line show the boundary. This has usually come from the OS Opendata released since 2010.

What sort of use do you have in mind for the parish council? Do you need any help or advice? For example, you can display OSM on a village website.
Dr Mark (2017-08-16 20:31:50+00:00): I hadn't thought about displaying OSM on the village website but that's a really good idea.
What I was looking at was delivery of leaflets, newsletters and so on in the local area. I contested the 2017 County Council election and am looking to be a candidate for the 2019 District Council election and possibly the 2021 County Council election. Because of that, I was trying to get a clear idea of which addresses fell within both the Ward and the District. I also wanted to know if there was data on, or a way to estimate, the number of dwellings on a given street (for delivery numbers), and whether I could get useful printable maps in case I manage to press-gang some volunteers to make deliveries.
For the Parish Council it's similar things that I want: we're looking at implementing a 'Good Neighbour' plan to offer help and support to older or vulnerable people within the ward, many of whom probably aren't reachable through electronic communication and might not read Parish notices, so I was looking for things that might help with a leaflet campaign.
chillly (2017-08-16 20:43:02+00:00): The map is created by volunteers. It looks as though no one has put the hours in to draw the houses in your village. A quick look at the aerial imagery tells me they could be traced from there, but it's a long job and not your real intention.

Electoral ward boundaries are not in OSM. I don't think they have been released under a suitable licence - something we are very fussy about. 

OSM maps can be printed and the data that makes them is freely downloadable (unlike any other map provider). Using the share icon on the right you can extract a small sample (village sized) as various formats for use in other software which might help you. 

Hope that helps.
FahRadler (2019-09-09 14:00:39+00:00): Hallo,

du hast
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37193847
mit access=no ergänzt.
Besteht tatsächlich für den way ein Betretungsverbot?!

Die Breite ist sicher nicht auf der überwiegenden Länge 0,6m!
Soweit ich mich erinnere ein Fortsweg mit >2,5m.
Auch die Rückstufung von tracktype 2 auf 4 seltsam.

Bitte als Namen nur solche Bezeichnungen verwenden mit denen das Element vor Ort gekennzeichnet ist, "Singletrail" und "pfad" kommen da eher selten vor!

Bitte überprüfen!

FahRadler
Alexander-II (2017-09-09 09:16:19+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы в этом пакете на дворовом проезде добавили теги на точку, которые означают тупик https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5039816927/history Но ни по снимкам, ни по смыслу (дорога не заканчивается в этом месте) тупика там нет. Что вы хотели отобразить?
kocio (2017-09-30 23:43:28+00:00): Czy aby na pewno w tym miejscu:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516230596

jest bród, czyli przejazd bezpośrednio przez wodę, czy może jednak jest tam mostek?
Commodoortje (2017-08-17 09:19:40+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-08-17 10:05:06+00:00): Ik heb wat kleine dingen aangepast. Probeer te voorkomen om de wegen aan de landuse vast te maken.
Commodoortje (2017-08-17 14:33:12+00:00): Ik zie dat je hier zebrapaden heb aangebracht, is dit in werkelijkheid zo?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5039841079
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5039841093
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=crossing
stephankn (2017-10-10 19:06:46+00:00): why is for example way 516234777 not connected to the rest of the network?
RVR007 (2017-10-19 16:58:35+00:00): Hi stephankn,
Thank you for your comment! We can't find the disconnected way you're mentioning here. Please let us know if you find anything else. Also please note we are using the OSM Tasking Manager to map small squares one at a time. The areas we are working in now in the North East have not been completed, so it is not a surprise that some of them end. It may be worthwhile to look at the Provinces in the South that are completed. We would love your feedback on those. 
Best,
Mohamed
literan (2017-08-17 11:56:17+00:00): Здравствуйте! Прошу вас не ставить на обычные дворовые проезды тег service=driveway. Он обычно применяется для проездов самого низшего класса, обычно к одному домику, коттеджу, зачастую вместе с access=private
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-08-02 13:25:50+00:00): Via service sobre a outra: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281332848/history
Hjart (2017-08-16 21:03:52+00:00): Jeg har ændret og kompletteret svingbegrænsninger i dette kryds. Bemærk at det er muligt at bruge andet end "højre/venstre-sving forbudt". I mange tilfælde finder jeg det f.eks. fordelagtigt at bruge "kun-lige-ud". Bemærk også at jeg finder det langt lettere at håndtere svingbegrænsninger i JOSM end i iD.
Bemærk også https://ahorn.lima-city.de/tr/ der er god til grafisk at tydeliggøre svingbegrænsninger i et område
Hjart (2017-08-16 21:09:05+00:00): Til at angive indholdet af en lagertank bruges normalt nøglen "content" og i dette tilfælde værdien "slurry". Se https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/content#values
MicDK (2017-08-17 08:00:08+00:00): Godt du siger det, Hjart. Jeg følger "det normale" fremover, og retter disse tre gyllebeholdere til Content = Slurry.
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:34:17+00:00): Olá, Cruzeirense.
Nesta sua edição você criou uma proibição de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:33:53+00:00): Olá, Cruzeirense.
Nesta sua edição você criou uma proibição de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:31:36+00:00): Olá, Cruzeirense.
Nesta sua edição você criou 10 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Cyclono (2017-08-17 11:16:34+00:00): Weg bij de westzeedijk is dus nu weg? Waarom hadden ze het aangelegt? Voor de werkzaamheden aan de scheepstimmermanslaan? Vreemd.
Cyclono (2017-08-17 11:17:59+00:00): Ben je daar ook geweest? Want de weg is niet te zien op PDOK denk ik of mapillary
Michiel M (2017-08-17 13:03:20+00:00): Hier zie de korte verbindingsweg nog bij de concurrent  https://www.google.nl/maps/@51.9094053,4.4714839,3a,75y,304.32h,64.96t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1spTvBlnRUYfnTWr8uX0GVeg!2e0!5s20161001T000000!7i13312!8i6656
Cyclono (2017-08-17 14:06:28+00:00): Maar ben je daar ook geweest, is het inderdaad weg? Mapillary or welke source laat niet zien wat er 2-4 weken geleden is veranderd.
Michiel M (2017-08-19 09:11:25+00:00): ja, micmin1972 ben ik op mapillary. Zie foto https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/xK_bDTJB4CD12Y5YNvZlpQ van vorige week waar deze weg niet meer is te zien en er een fietsverbinding op deze plek te zien is (en welke ik heb ingetekend).
Cyclono (2017-08-19 12:44:47+00:00): Ok er is nieuw asfalt, waar hebben ze dat gras vandaan gehaald. Gemeente Rotterdam doet raar anno 2017 :p Goed gedaan, ik ben nu in het buitenland en kan er niet langs lopen. Hou alles in de gaten voor de zekerheid. :)
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:36:23+00:00): Olá, Cruzeirense.
Nesta sua edição você criou 8 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
stefanct (2017-08-19 14:05:14+00:00): Du hast mit dieser Änderung einen Großteil der Glocknerstraße zu einer parking aisle degradiert. Bitte umgehend korrigieren!
Tiamate (2017-08-19 15:22:47+00:00): von kdkeller korrigiert
kdkeller (2017-08-19 15:36:29+00:00): Genau, danke für den Hinweis. War keine Absicht, sorry :-)
sommerluk (2017-08-17 09:12:03+00:00): Merci pour la contribution ! 😊 👍
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:35:19+00:00): Olá, Eduscott.
Nesta sua edição você criou 6 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
guidofioravanti (2017-08-16 21:35:59+00:00): Wrong comment,edited several pointsand added a post office
rarad74 (2017-08-17 20:01:08+00:00): Hello. And from were do you know that are a wild gpx track? Maybe someonte go trough there...
TychoBrahe (2017-08-17 21:41:38+00:00): OSM is mapping, not track recording. There are other tools/websites for that purpose.
rarad74 (2017-08-18 09:42:24+00:00): Then, you dont know the meaning of word mapping. I recommend you to learn further about mapping. All osm editors integrate a gpx add/edit tool too. So... ???
And probably other worked hard to record these tracks. So, think twice before delete anything else from the map!
TychoBrahe (2017-08-18 16:46:34+00:00): Of course GPX track import may always be used to generate proper map data. However, for your intention to simply share activities with others, OSM map data is the wrong storage place. Take a look at "komoot", for example. It uses OSM map data but keeps activity tracks separate. And there are more activity trackers with sharing functionality.
Rodrigo Rega (2017-10-01 12:23:58+00:00): Hola,

¿Este círculo que has añadido en este conjunto de cambios es correcto? [1]

Cuando se aclare el caso cerrar esta nota [2].

Un saludo

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516250608#map=19/42.77628/-7.04851&layers=N
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1158801
villagroy doncos (2017-10-01 18:31:37+00:00): Hola, ese círculo está mal. Pretendía indicar que hay una presa para regadío que recoge el agua del río Valdeparada. Además, en ese tramo del río le llaman "río pequeno". Pero no sé cómo hacer ninguna de las dos cosas y me quedo esa cosa rara sin revisar. Ya está retirado. En otras zonas en las que estuve mapeando, algunos nombres de parajes tienen todavía una ubicación aproximada, y los he marcado con tres puntos antes del nombre. Pretendo confimar la ubicación en los próximos dos meses, con reuniones con vecinos de esta zona (aldea de Doncos). Saludos
Rodrigo Rega (2017-10-01 19:00:36+00:00): Hola de nuevo,

Gracias por la aclaración. En cuanto a la utilización de "..." para marcar trabajos pendientes: Te recomendaría no usar ese sistema, ya que ya existen herramientas para más adecuadas, como las notas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Notes

Gracias por tus aportaciones, un saludo!
raito (2017-08-17 03:52:31+00:00): I did some photo mapping around this intersection earlier this year (uploaded to Mapillary), and you can see barriers there. There are gaps between the barriers, so it is still physically possible to do any turns.
MyWayOrNoHighway (2017-08-17 20:21:28+00:00): Hey raito,
Thank you for the message and the additional imagery input. A proper fix may be to add the tag barrier=bollard (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard), on the middle of both of the ways I drew in, and to include turn restrictions. Adding these features should accurately represent the turn restrictions seen in mapillary. 
Thanks,
M
DaveF (2017-08-17 19:05:24+00:00): Hi
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/29426931/history
Are you sure it's a church? Looks domesticto me.
How about a place suburb?
Glassman (2017-08-17 21:43:36+00:00): I deleted the city addition, but did add in new boundaries from country records. Boundaries are difficult - the iD editor is not well suited to edit them as well. JOSM is a better choice.
neuhausr (2017-08-17 14:03:15+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Just wanted to let you know I slightly modified this edit so that the school way covered the entire grounds and the one you drew was tagged as a building. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool for more info. Happy mapping!