piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2020-11-03 23:31:48+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
impiaaa (2020-11-18 02:29:49+00:00): I guess I don't live there so I can't confirm, but I changed the tags the way I did because a park with "Planned" in the name seems like it shouldn't be open (and a park still under construction shouldn't have leisure=park); and it doesn't appear from imagery that the entire tower site is itself a building (nothing but actual building footprints should have building=yes; perhaps building=no would be better). Additionally, having *both* tags that something is proposed *and* active is just confusing.
Glassman (2020-11-03 23:35:16+00:00): The edit looks good. I would recommend highway=footway. highway=pedestrian implies that it can be used for vehicles. We use British English in OSM which can cause some confusion for us US english speaker. A Footway is usually a paved place to walk. If it's next to a road, then beside highway=footway also add footway=sidewalk. 

BTW - If you add trails, then it's highway=path. 

I'll send you more information in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93506158
dgitto (2020-11-04 18:26:18+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM.
Ricordati di chiudere le note che hai aperto, dopo che apporti le modifiche
Glassman (2020-11-03 23:36:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

Thanks for doing this. I know people are working on a trail from Spokane to Lewiston via Pullman - I suspect this could easily be part of the same system.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93506364
MapMakerGal (2020-11-04 10:21:09+00:00): Boas, isto estaba ben, os nomes van enteiros, despois en short_name vai o de IES Carral ou o que sexa...
ivanbranco (2020-11-11 20:07:30+00:00): Hai creato due way sovrapposte.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-11-04 01:01:10+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 92907203, 92907215, 92907226.
A67-A67 (2020-11-04 00:46:30+00:00): Hallo ,
Ik zie deze import niet in de lijst met imports (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue) staan? Heb je de import guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) wel gevolgd?

Ik ben eigenlijk wel benieuwd hoe je van plan bent om deze ruim 16000 bomen up to date te houden en daarnaast zie ik dat er nu bomen dubbel staan op plekken waar de bomen al toegevoegd waren.
A67-A67 (2020-11-04 14:23:27+00:00): Zie ook: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71082
user_5359 (2020-11-05 04:31:12+00:00): Hello, do not mark your workspaces within OSM with paths that have the keys tile, x and y.  Please delete these data immediately. See
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ZJC
aweech (2020-11-04 16:32:13+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for your contribution. I went ahead and retagged this as a Bus Bay since there is no physical separation between the bus pull-out and 100 South. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bus_bay for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-11-04 01:01:11+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 92907203, 92907215, 92907226.
felipeeugenio (2020-11-04 13:15:20+00:00): Estimado. Por favor unirse a la comunidad en el chat según correo que le envié. Los cambios de clasificaciones de calles son algo delicado.
gscholz (2020-11-06 08:21:43+00:00): Hi Melissa,
this changeset has added several errors to the OSM database, first regarding self intersecting lines and second tree coverage tagged as water:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.57814&lat=-25.36989&zoom=14&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Guido
Kovoschiz (2020-11-04 14:49:44+00:00): Please don't use a functioning `building=`for these.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93510095
Allison P (2022-06-30 17:45:38+00:00): Legally, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866841363 is not a marked crosswalk. "Marked" means something very specific.
marczoutendijk (2020-11-04 11:10:57+00:00): Please note:
You should use the key residential=* always together with landuse=residential!

Por favor, tenga en cuenta:
¡Deberías usar la clave residentiall=* siempre junto con el uso de la landuse=residential!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:residential
Georgievna (2025-11-15 18:31:49+00:00): Most of these areas are crooked
Carnildo (2020-11-04 09:35:45+00:00): Please don't do huge edits like this.  It's not showing up properly in any of the QA tools, so it's impossible to tell if there are any mistakes.
Minh Nguyen (2020-11-07 20:01:16+00:00): Sorry, I won’t do it again. If it helps, https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ZQ8 returns elements that were added or changed in this changeset. A more sophisticated attic query could return deleted elements as well.
skquinn (2020-11-09 02:39:23+00:00): Agree with Carnildo here; these should be split into smaller changesets. I do appreciate the spirit of generally fixing up things across the country on Election Day, though.
Arlo James Barnes (2024-10-02 17:17:43+00:00): funny that I was about to do something similar on a local scale when I decided to see what changeset last touched a commercial area with a voting location for _this_ election cycle...
Frans S (2020-11-04 10:03:18+00:00): Hello
See my previous remark on mapping of Tall buildings.
Would you be so kind to adjust your mappings ?
Task 2455
Best regards and keep mapping
user_8466505 (2020-11-04 05:57:15+00:00): God loves us no matter what.
Allison P (2021-02-12 18:05:21+00:00): Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to Customers. This is not recognized by most data consumers.  Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
naaitha (2021-02-15 10:49:25+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit. I have made necessary changes under changeset #99302018. Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
naaitha.
GinaroZ (2021-03-07 15:03:36+00:00): If you had checked something other than Esri imagery when adding a road which crosses a railway then you would've noticed the road does not exist...
sabodige (2021-03-09 11:10:36+00:00): Hi GinaroZ thanks for checking into our edits. i have made the edits based on the esri and maxar imagery. I am not sure how the imagery used column is only displaying esri. Apologies, if my edits are contradicting with the ground reality. thanks for the quick correction. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to incorporate in my future edits. always happy to learn from the community
GinaroZ (2021-03-09 20:19:15+00:00): Thanks for the reply - just remember that Bing imagery is there as well! :)
Frans S (2020-11-04 10:00:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping
Frans S (2020-11-04 09:59:09+00:00): Hello. 
Please pay more attention on accurate mapping of the buildings. These buildings have extentions wich you did not map.
Best regards
mavl (2020-11-27 14:31:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94899134 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94055460].
tordans (2020-11-05 21:31:10+00:00): Hi Stefan, der Fahrradweg ist doch für dieses kleine Stück schon vorhanden, oder? Warum dann construction? V>G
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93519183
StefanHRT (2020-11-06 02:10:11+00:00): Hallo tordans,
Da die beiden kleinen Stücke in Bauzäunen enden da die weiterführenden Radwege noch nicht fertig sind (was mir beim vorbeifahren auffiel), obendrein der mittlere Verbindungsteil ebenfalls noch als Baustelle deklariert war, hatte ich das dementsprechend so angepasst, damit Router dies vorerst nicht mit berücksichtigen (so ging es mir nämlich wo Komoot mich da in der Tourplanung abbiegen lassen wollte). Sobald es einen fertigen Radweg gibt, kann dies ja dann bei den beiden Stücken entfernt werden, dann kommt man dort auch per Ampelanlage über die Straße ;)
 
VG
Stefan
mavl (2020-11-27 14:31:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94899134 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94055460].
mavl (2020-11-27 14:31:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94899134 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94055460].
mavl (2020-11-27 14:30:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94899134 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94055460].
mavl (2020-11-27 14:31:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94899134 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94055460].
hatul (2022-06-28 19:06:48+00:00): שביל מאיפה ולאן? נראה סתם מנותק.
ibanez (2021-05-22 06:41:58+00:00): Am Ende der befestigten Straße (Westerbecker Weg, Neudorf-Platendorf) steht das Verkehrszeichen 250 (Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art - was auch Fahrradfahren mit einschließt). Das VZ hast du ja selber eingetragen. Es gibt dort kein Zusatzzeichen was Fahrräder ausnimmt. Gleichzeitig gehen hier mehrere Radrouten durch. Anscheinend will die Gemeinde hier keine Radfahrer oder kennt die Bedeutung von Verkehrszeichen nicht.
OSMBenutzer13 (2021-05-24 08:27:05+00:00): Die Gemeinde hat diese Schilder gar nicht aufgestellt, sondern der Landkreis. Es ist aber nicht verboten, sein Fahrrad über die Brücke zu schieben und danach wieder aufzusteigen. Die Brücke ist auch nur mit jeweils zwei Pollern abgesperrt, um zu verhindern, dass dort größere Fahrzeuge drüber fahren. Die Traglast ist anscheinend unter 3 Tonnen. Besser solch ein Lösung, als die Brücke komplett mit einem verriegelten Zaun für alle zu sperren.
OSMBenutzer13 (2021-05-24 08:31:34+00:00): Aber ich gebe Dir recht, ein "Radfahrer frei" Schild wäre sinnvoller gewesen oder eben das Schild 260. Aber das musst Du dem Landkreis mitteilen, damit es dort verstanden wird.
ibanez (2021-05-24 10:07:27+00:00): Stimmt, da ist der Landkreis zuständig. Ich wollte die Intention hinter den eingetragenen Radrouten verstehen, ob sie da absichtlich oder unabsichtlich hindurchgehen. Danke für deine Hinweise. Betroffen ist allerdings nicht nur die Brücke über den Moorkanal, sondern der ganze Weg von Neudorf-Platendorf bis zur Brücke und weiter Richtung Westerbeck z.B. der Weg hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386115437 . Schieben ist natürlich möglich, aber spätestens an der Brücke, wo ein grün-weisses Schild einen Radwanderweg auszeichnet und am selben Mast mit VZ250 hängt bin ich dann doch stutzig geworden.
OSMBenutzer13 (2021-05-24 16:13:12+00:00): Die Wegweiser kommen von der AG Fahrradwege i.A. der Gemeinde Sassenburg. Mit dem Landkreis wurde danach auch gesprochen. Der höheren Windlast darf kein weiteres Schild montiert werden (also Radfahrer frei). Wenn vorher bei der AG Fahrradwege nachgefragt worden wäre, hätte ein VZ 260 anstelle 250 verwendet werden können. Aber in hoffentlich Ende 2022 ist der Weg und die Brücke wieder neu. Dann ist das VZ 250 ohnehin überflüssig.
OSMBenutzer13 (2021-05-24 16:16:13+00:00): Durch die Zusatzschilder ist aber nur die Brücke betroffen. Soll nur dazu dienen, dass andere Nutzer nicht erst bei der Brücke die Sperrung sehen.
ibanez (2021-05-24 16:45:49+00:00): Hatte das Zusatzschild "1200m Moorkanal-Brücke gesperrt" nicht gesehen. Danke.
mavl (2020-11-27 14:31:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94899134 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94055460].
thopf (2020-11-13 23:41:03+00:00): Ich glaube, bei der Bearbeitung in Graz ist dir selbst ein Fehler unterlaufen. ;)
thopf (2020-11-14 00:04:20+00:00): Schon korrigiert!
mueschel (2020-11-08 11:27:52+00:00): Hi
what do these tags mean? They are not used in any other place.
  payment:bdo = yes
  payment:bpi = yes
ianlopez1115 (2020-11-08 14:36:20+00:00): It appears that payments via bank (BDO and BPI being two of the Philippines' major banks) are accepted in this shop - unsure how that works
mueschel (2020-11-08 15:19:30+00:00): Thanks for the explanation.
This might be payment:wire_transfer.
naveenpf (2020-11-04 07:15:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala
Please add amenity=fire_station  tag also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fire_and_Rescue_stations_in_Kerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93521672
vsahith (2020-11-04 07:14:51+00:00): Modified Highway tag
mavl (2020-11-27 14:30:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94899134 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94055460].
mavl (2020-11-27 14:31:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94899134 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94055460].
Frans S (2020-11-04 09:53:10+00:00): Hello. I reviewed your work here.
Sorry to say, I had to remove most mappings due to poor mapping quality.
Not Accurate, squared and several clusterd buildings. 
Please pay more attention on accurate and squared mapping.
Best regards
Frans S (2020-11-04 08:12:38+00:00): Hello,
I am validating tasks of this project and welcome you as a new mapper. Please read this welcome letter and support issues.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/TM_Welcome_Letter
As a validator we check if all mappings has been done according the instructions and are free of errors
Especially we pay attention to work by new mappers to help them to avoid errors and give guidance

The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not always comply with that criteria.Not accurate enough and not squared.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing

Another issue is how to map tall buildings

High buildings need to be mapped in a different way.
Because the image has been taken under an angle you will see both the roof and a side of a building.
So the top of the building is not the place were that building actually is build on the ground.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-11-04 08:00:26+00:00): Hello,
I am validating tasks of this project and welcome you as a new mapper. Please read this welcome letter and support issues.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/TM_Welcome_Letter
As a validator we check if all mappings has been done according the instructions and are free of errors
Especially we pay attention to work by new mappers to help them to avoid errors and give guidance

The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not always comply with that criteria. Not accurate and squared.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing

Another issue is how to map tall buildings

High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
Because the image has been taken under an angle you will see both the roof and a side of a building.
So the top of the building is not the place were that building actually is build on the ground.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-11-04 07:58:11+00:00): Hello,
I am validating tasks of this project and welcome you as a new mapper. Please read this welcome letter and support issues.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/TM_Welcome_Letter
As a validator we check if all mappings has been done according the instructions and are free of errors
Especially we pay attention to work by new mappers to help them to avoid errors and give guidance

The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not always comply with that criteria. Your mappings are not accurate and squared,
Also do not connect nodes of a building to a highway.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing

Another issue is how to map tall buildings

High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
Because the image has been taken under an angle you will see both the roof and a side of a building.
So the top of the building is not the place were that building actually is build on the ground.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-11-04 07:56:05+00:00): Hello,
I am validating tasks of this project and welcome you as a new mapper. Please read this welcome letter and support issues.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/TM_Welcome_Letter
As a validator we check if all mappings has been done according the instructions and are free of errors
Especially we pay attention to work by new mappers to help them to avoid errors and give guidance

The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not always comply with that criteria.Not accurate enough and not squared.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing

Another issue is how to map tall buildings

High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
Because the image has been taken under an angle you will see both the roof and a side of a building.
So the top of the building is not the place were that building actually is build on the ground.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping

Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-11-04 07:53:57+00:00): Hello,
I am validating tasks of this project and welcome you as a new mapper. Please read this welcome letter and support issues.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Humanitarian_OSM_Team/TM_Welcome_Letter
As a validator we check if all mappings has been done according the instructions and are free of errors
Especially we pay attention to work by new mappers to help them to avoid errors and give guidance

The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not always comply with that criteria. 
Yyour mappings are not accurate enough and buildings are not squared.
You often connected nodes of buildings together. Each building should be mapped separately.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing

Another issue is how to map tall buildings

High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
Because the image has been taken under an angle you will see both the roof and a side of a building.
So the top of the building is not the place were that building actually is build on the ground.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping

Best regards and keep mapping