piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joost schouppe (2021-06-15 15:20:24+00:00): De boardwalk die je hier hebt toegevoegd is het oude pad. Volgens de informatie die ik heb gekregen, is er een nieuw pad met boardwalk, net ten zuiden van dit paadje. Ik heb het zo ingetekend. Als je nog eens in de buurt ben, kan je misschien verifiëren.
mavl (2021-04-22 14:44:16+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, указывайте источник ваших данных правильно. JOSM Validator не является источником адресных данных.  
  
Также было бы хорошо, если бы вы указывали названия улиц так, как это принято в OSM - полностью. Например, Ломоносова. Непонятно, то ли это улица, то переулок.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/933547473/history  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
mavl (2021-04-22 14:48:16+00:00): Обозначений типа building=дом лучше избегать. Значения тега building записываются латинскими буквами.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/933547593/history
portalaventura (2021-04-21 18:00:30+00:00): Mdsxds, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de São Paulo mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmsp.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2021-04-21 19:41:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your node. You take some very unusual keys for the address information.
અંકલેશ્વર (2021-08-15 13:40:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140527612/history is not a cable. Why are you doing this?
SomeoneElse2 (2023-04-30 13:54:33+00:00): @અંકલેશ્વર does this need reverting?
portalaventura (2021-04-21 18:15:05+00:00): Partager, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade do Paraná mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmpr.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
GinaroZ (2021-04-21 19:51:51+00:00): Thanks for sorting this, I've closed my note :)
mbeyerle (2021-04-21 18:58:28+00:00): observant!
user_2066394 (2021-04-21 19:05:29+00:00): Da hätte ich eher den alten Standort mit disused:*=* eingetragen und am neuen Standort einen neuen POI für den Bioladen eingerichtet. Technisch fliegt die alte Filiale ja vermutlich nicht rüber, sondern steht leer.
Cerritus (2021-04-21 19:59:13+00:00): Stimmt, hätte so durchaus auch Sinn ergeben.
Jrachi (2021-04-23 14:08:43+00:00): Ciao.
Ti segnalo due errori:
1) il tag per altezza è "ele" non "height
2) Nelle relazioni dei percorsi escursionistici si possono inserire solo le way e i guidepost (i pali o altro con le frecce ecc.)

3) non è un errore ma mi viene il dubbio. Hai tolto il nome Testarebbo, ok, ma il posto non si chiama così?
Inoltre "Croce CEP" è una croce?
In tal caso non è locality ma se di origine storiche/religiose è
historic=wayside_cross

Altrimenti se è una "croce di vetta" o assimilabile:
man_made=cross

Ivo
andgiors (2021-04-26 07:19:01+00:00): 1) grazie, correggo il tag
2) scollego quindi la relazione da questo nodo
3) ho rinominato il nodo e inserito il Testarebbo dove è esattamente (più a Nord Ovest): su tante carte recenti viene riportato questo errore ma il Testarebbo è un torrione roccioso e non questa porzione di crinale su cui c'è una croce. E' stata posta nel 1980 quindi non ha una valenza storica, forse più assimilabile a "croce di vetta"
Grazie!
andgiors (2021-04-26 07:25:25+00:00): quesito: vedo che il tag "ele" viene riferito al sistema wgs84: non è quindi correttissimo comunque perchè non è una quota sul livello del mare bensì sull'ellissoide e in questa zona la differenza può anche superare i 40 metri! si trascura?
Jrachi (2021-04-26 08:09:56+00:00): La pagina https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:ele
rispetto a quella originale
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele dice in maniera più sintetica che la quota deve essere preferibilmente wgs84 perché è lo standard di OSM.
Se le quote sono tutte riferite allo stesso sistema di riferimento (lo so che non è corretto, ma passamela per semplicità!) non esistono errori.
E direi che si, si può trascurare.
andgiors (2021-04-26 09:40:57+00:00): grazie, letto. in effetti anche l'immagine laterale riferita al Piccolo Cervino riporta la quota non in WGS84 ma SLM....
andgiors (2021-04-26 09:48:56+00:00): commento relativo alla pagina che mi hai linkato in IT: "Per OpenStreetMap, si prega di utilizzare l'altezza sul livello del mare definita dal World Geodetic System, revisione WGS 84". la quota Ellissoidica NON ha nulla a che fare con il livello del mare se non in un punto unico di orientamento che può essere distante anche centinaia di km...
Nella pagina originale, che sono andato a leggere e tradurre, dice invece che si dovrebbe usare il geoide EGM96 perchè le differenze rispetto a wgs84 potrebbero essere addirittura di 100 m: questo vuol dire che soli in Italia consideriamo WGS84 e non EGM96?
Grazie!
Jrachi (2021-04-26 10:17:57+00:00): Per parli arabo.
Se trovi errori in una pagina li puoi correggere o scrivere al contributore.
O discuterne in talk:it
Jrachi (2021-04-26 10:20:05+00:00): Per me parli arabo.
Se sai quello che dici puoi modificare la pagina wiki.
Oppure segnalare alla comunità su talk:it
andgiors (2021-04-26 10:48:35+00:00): Si so di cosa parlo ma non ho abbastanza esperienza in OSM per capire come intervenire su una "convenzione". Sulle carte normalmente si trova la quota riferita al livello del mare (e anche questa non è sempre riferita allo stesso Geoide (la griglia Egm96 è superata per accuratezza da quella di ITALGEO2005). Per cui credo sia accettabile indicare la quota che "ci si aspetta di trovare". Ma se leggo una informazione in un altro paese che non segue la stessa regola potrei avere delle differenze ragguardevoli....ad esempio per luoghi a cavallo dei confini di stato...
SomeoneElse (2021-04-25 15:00:11+00:00): Hello,
In the changeset comment, would it be possible to provide a bit more info in addition to "Fixing outstanding errors"?  It'd certainly hep other mappers to understand what was happening.
Best Regards,
Andy
tars4815 (2021-04-24 19:05:38+00:00): Ottimo lavoro, Anna! :)
- Federica x WikiMedia Italia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103359841
tars4815 (2021-04-24 19:13:37+00:00): Nel caso di elementi poligonali che presentano una geometria regolare con angoli retti, la community di OpenStreetMap richiede di ortogonalizzare l'elemento dopo averlo tracciato. Questo è possibile selezionando l'elemento di interesse sul suo perimetro appena tracciato e premendo 'Q' sulla propria tastiera. Resto a disposizione per eventuali dubbi sulla procedura.
- Federica x WikiMedia Italia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103360017
user_2066394 (2021-04-21 19:16:53+00:00): Wie lange stand der zweite Kamin?
maxi_ (2021-04-21 19:29:58+00:00): Ich denke das war ein Tank oder ähnliches. Wann er abgebaut wurde kann ich nicht genau sagen, auf älteren Luftbildern ist er noch zu sehen.
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-22 05:56:18+00:00): Ar tikrai šitoje vietoje yra fiziškai nuo kelio atskirtas realus pėsčiųjų takas?
Raimondas_jr (2021-04-25 07:24:29+00:00): Yra pėsčiųjų pramintas takelis už metalinio kelio atitvaro. Juo visuomet važiuoju dviračiu iš Akademijos per Nemuną.
Takelis apie 30 cm. pločio pramintas ir pravažinėtas, tad žolės ant jo jau nėra.
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-25 12:09:26+00:00): Supratau, na jei už metalinio atitvaro, tai kaip ir gali būti atskiras objektas. Ačiū už info!
Warin61 (2021-04-22 08:59:11+00:00): Your changeset comments .. are not good. 

What have you been trying to do? Describe that. 

Read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---------------------------
I read you have been adding 'Roman Road' ... in places where it no longer exists? If so you might add that to Open Historical Map... where historical things are welcome. Unfortunately I could not find these easily from you changeset comments.
tars4815 (2021-04-24 19:10:00+00:00): Presta attenzione alle abitazioni molto vicine tra loro. Nella zona di mappatura definita per questa attività non è stata rilevata la presenza di elementi abitativi a schiera. Per questo motivo, si consiglia di non mappare elementi poligonali "attaccati" o che condividono uno o più nodi. Anche se dalle immagini satellitari i tetti e le abitazioni sembrano molto vicine tra loro, il suggerimento è di tracciare due elementi separati, anche solo leggermente. Grazie per l'attenzione: spero che i suggerimenti possano essere utili anche per le prossime attività su OSM :)
- Federica x WikiMedia Italia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103360756
portalaventura (2021-04-21 19:13:47+00:00): Vandolz, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade do Rio de Janeiro mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmrj.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
stevea (2021-04-21 19:39:49+00:00): Really nice work on all you have done so far on USBR 77.  That's it:  I simply want to thank and congratulate you on some great improvements to both OSM and the USBRS.
aweech (2021-04-21 20:07:17+00:00): Thanks! I just finished it, corrected the mistakes, and checked it off on the Wiki. I was so excited to see a USBR go straight through the Wasatch Front, I just had to add it! If I have time tomorrow, I'll get started on the spur routes :)
stevea (2021-04-21 20:18:57+00:00): There is also that pretty cool statewide "story map" that is noted in the wiki.  It gives a good, rather pretty overview of Utah's (pending) USBRs.

Sometime "this summer," (June? July?) I'll make another talk-us post when I hear when these get approved — assuming they do, they all have so far, 100% of the time, but you never know if AASHTO will find some technical reason to reject them — hasn't happened yet, though.

I also appreciate you making the "full circle" of updating the wiki.  That's really helpful when doing these.  In fact, it's WAY more important to "get 'em in" (to OSM) than it is to mention so doing in the wiki, but the wiki does a pretty good job of "status reports," but only when people keep it updated with what's really in the map.  Again, thanks.

Happy mapping!
KPull (2021-04-22 10:02:00+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your contribution. Il-Majjistral Nature and History Park was already marked on the map. Furthermore, the 'park' tag should only be used for municipal and city parks/gardens. The 'nature_reserve' tag is more appropriate in this case. I've added the appropriate tags for you on the correct area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103360953
Glassman (2021-04-21 23:11:06+00:00): #TIP: footways are more like sidewalks. (We use British English since OSM got it's start in England.) Trails are usually tagged as highway=path.  If this is just a path, can you update OSM?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103361366
hauke-stieler (2021-04-21 19:30:57+00:00): Zu schnell auf Enter gedrückt: Hab hier ein EFH eingetragen
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-13 10:58:49+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão criada por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12613093

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essa restrição?
Baconcrisp (2021-05-13 14:16:25+00:00): Hello,

Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I verified that both restrictions are signed and I removed the no_u_turn since the no_left_turn also prevents that action. Here is the mapillary image with the signs: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-23.633533477783203&lng=-46.731502532958984&z=17&focus=photo&dateFrom=2017-01-01&pKey=gtr1F8AO0yvqNhWuARcf2X.

Please let me know if you have other questions or feedback!
user_2066394 (2021-04-21 21:11:27+00:00): Welche?
parsewski (2021-04-22 14:03:48+00:00): Meine. Möglichst alle auf Level 1 und möglichst viele auf Level 2. Warum? Habe ich was kaputt gemacht?
user_2066394 (2021-04-23 10:45:40+00:00): Die Fläche ist HUGE.
Die anderen Bearbeitungen sind handlicher.
BCNorwich (2021-04-23 08:02:35+00:00): Hi, You have placed Way: 933602881 on top of Way: Rainham Road North (4877181) making for duplication of highways. This is obviously incorrect and disrupts routing, the Way: 933602881 should be amended or removed. 

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-04-24 08:51:26+00:00): No response and you've made a further similar duplication so I've removed Way: 933602881

Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
EnumMapper (2021-04-21 20:51:26+00:00): update name:zh for Mönchengladbach
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-13 11:00:52+00:00): Olá,

as restrições de conversão criadas por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12613121

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12613122

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas (possuem uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essas restrições?
UncoolGuyJake (2021-05-13 14:33:52+00:00): Hello Marcos,

Thank you for reaching out to me.

I have had a chance to look at these restrictions and there is Mapillary footage to support them.

Please see this image (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=3MHbYB5AoekhjsGyVJqBcd&lat=-23.604443333299997&lng=-46.71229&z=17)
for this relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12613121) 

and this image (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=lCOoN6OBF-BmkbXkeAMjZA&lat=-23.603989817618586&lng=-46.71227854172314&z=17) 
for this relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12613122).

Thanks
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-13 16:30:31+00:00): I have been very careful with these messages, however, this situation was a no_u_turn restriction in the same way, which has been commonly performed by inexperienced editors using the ID editor, and I ended up not paying due attention to checking.

I apologize immensely and thank you for the time you spent alerting me.

I will redouble my attention to these alerts.
UncoolGuyJake (2021-05-13 20:10:29+00:00): Thanks again for your input. I ended up removing the restrictions because while there is signage, I do not believe they are necessary.

Again, I appreciate you reaching out to me with any questions you have regarding my edits and I look forward to hearing from you in the future.

Thanks.
user_5359 (2021-04-22 04:01:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area.
flexagoon (2021-04-24 12:09:03+00:00): А Хмель и Солод это точно amenity=bar, а не shop=alcohol?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103362066
Silka123 (2021-04-24 15:40:08+00:00): В этом заведении вы можете купить пиво, как на вынос, так и посидеть с кружкой пива внутри заведения: есть столы и стулья, туалет и пр. Поэтому мой выбор пал на бар.
user_2066394 (2021-04-21 21:09:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/933606785
Hätte man da den alten Umiss nicht weiterverwenden können?
Hat das Nebengebäude eine Verbindung zum Haupthaus?
t78fe (2021-04-23 20:46:37+00:00): Ja, das stimmt, den alten Umriss hätte man weiterverwenden können. Das war ein Versehen, sorry.
Das Nebengebäude ist ein eigenes Gebäude. Habe heute selbst nachgesehen: Das Haupt- und Nebengebäude haben keine gemeinsame Wand. Die einzige Verbindung ist eine zu den beiden benachbarten Wänden senkrecht stehende Wand mit Tür/Tor. Diese ist aber nur etwas breiter als eine Tür. So in etwa 1,5m. Weiß nicht ob und wie man so etwas überhaupt einträgt. Ansonsten sind beide Gebäude aus meiner Sicht so eingetragen, wie ich sie auch vor Ort gesehen habe.
ququruzka (2021-05-22 11:30:53+00:00): перестаньте переименовывать улицы.
gscscnd (2021-04-22 06:46:06+00:00): Zmiana <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159022020/history> z terenu zabudowanego na budynek była przypadkowa?
zuicz (2021-04-22 09:01:15+00:00): To pierwszy zestaw zmian, więc na pewno tak :)
Cristoffs (2021-04-22 09:04:12+00:00): a droga? nie powinna być inaczej klasyfikowana?
zuicz (2021-04-22 09:05:18+00:00): tzn? Ta nowa czy podjazd?
Cristoffs (2021-04-22 14:48:37+00:00): Droga nie mogłem sprawdzić na orto, czy na pewno powinna być tak oznaczona.
marki_h (2021-04-23 06:32:44+00:00): potwierdzam mój pierwszy raz ;)
drogę możliwe, że też źle skategoryzowałem, na dzień dzisiejszy wygląda tak:
https://1drv.ms/u/s!AkcW4pRaYr04gagr-5Ul5gUvYGppgw?e=t2cfPV
VinasCZ (2021-04-21 20:20:14+00:00): (Ruchill not Firhill, a wee brainfart there)
mueschel (2021-04-22 12:01:54+00:00): Hi,
what does 'roller=yes' mean? Thsi tag is not used in any other place.
deepmind98 (2021-04-22 14:12:15+00:00): These roads surface are fine enough to practice roller.
Most roads are not.
mueschel (2021-04-22 14:36:55+00:00): What is the meaning of the term "roller"?

If you just want to tag the surface quality, you can use the "surface" and "smoothness" tags.
deepmind98 (2021-04-22 22:02:57+00:00): Oh... maybe it's "roller-skate" ?
English is not my native language.
I see there are attributes like "foot", "bicycle" and "horse", so I guess "roller-skate" make sense here too.
Is "roller-skate" ok for you?
mueschel (2021-04-23 07:13:32+00:00): Those tags are legal access restrictions - they reflect what the signs at the road say. If there are signs that refer to roller skates, you can add this. 
But these tags should not be used to tag personal impressions of what might me a good use or not.
deepmind98 (2021-04-23 19:05:33+00:00): I'll go check
deepmind98 (2021-04-23 19:29:10+00:00): Ok, road signs says "pedestrian" and "bicycle".
However, the official website https://ravel.wallonie.be/home.html says "pedestrian", "bicycle", "horse" and "roller-skate": "...Soit plus de 45 itinéraires locaux balisés pour vos balades en famille et vos randonnées à pied, en vélo, à cheval, en roller......".
Let me know your thoughts
Reeniz (2021-04-21 21:50:21+00:00): Esta quedando muy bueno el parque!
GustavoE (2021-04-22 12:45:01+00:00): Muchas gracias por tu comentario!
eggie (2021-04-22 06:44:07+00:00): Top!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 20:53:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102529017, 102529346, 102529424, 102529496, 102529558, 102529653, 102529704, 102529836, 102529922, 102530053, 102530112, 102530282, 102530421, 102530533, 102530686, 102530868, 102530902, 102530978, 102531089, 102531216, 102531537, 102531614, 102532054, 102532163, 102532694, 102532875, 102533008, 102533421, 102533507, 102533606, 102533803, 102844803, 102845015, 102845072, 102845153, 102845290, 102845369, 102845490, 102845703, 102845801, 102856018, 102856109, 102856151, 102856285, 102856370, 102856495, 102857090, 102857148, 102857198, 102857363.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-21 21:02:45+00:00): 1 way failed revert, and it was an improvement by a previous OSM mapper.
eggie (2021-04-22 09:30:12+00:00): Dag zontomaatje..
Het is allemaal half af. De construction=.....  heb je overal laten staan
Je verandert de beoordeling van ervaren mapper A67 A67 in primary_link. Dat is het zeker niet
Het is beoordeeld als secondary.
Verder zie ik nog foutmeldingen 
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	1
warnings:impossible_oneway:highway 	5
MVG
eggie


je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103364233
eggie (2021-04-22 09:32:18+00:00): Ik zie dat medemapper A67- A67 het al opgepakt heeft
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-22 06:46:31+00:00): Dag SG   Let op dat je de paden niet vastplakt aan de landuse=...
Je kunt dat voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken bij intekenen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103364458
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-22 07:12:54+00:00): Het wandelpad heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse.
Even kort door de bocht... Wanneer er een bord G7 staat  (rond blauw met de wandelaar met kind) of duidelijk alleen bedoeld voor wandelaars  dan tag je highway=footway en als er geen bord staat dan highway=path
Die laatste categorie routeert dan weer voor tweewielers.
Mag je op een path niet fietsen dan tag je vehicle=no erbij of juist bicycle=yes als het wel mag. 
Kan me herinneren dat het hier wat onduidelijk is (was?)
Ben hier ook al eens bezig geweest zie ik nu.
Mapse
eggie
EnumMapper (2021-04-21 21:15:30+00:00): source: search engine and common knowledge