piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:22:49+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
highflyer74 (2017-04-25 07:47:17+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. In diesem Fall wurden zwei POI (Kirche und Burger Restaurant) eingetragen, die aber schon in OSM vorhanden waren. Ich habe die neuen Daten mit den schon existierenden kombiniert und die beiden von Dir erstellten Punkte gelöscht, damit die Historie der POIs erhalten bleibt. Sei mir deshalb nicht böse und mappe gern weiter! Wenn Du etwas neues eintragen möchtest, schau Dich genau um, ob ein Objekt vielleicht schon vorhanden ist. 

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AWikiStart) ans Herz legen.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB,

Oliver
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-04-22 22:10:20+00:00): Hello Ahchaa, I noticed that you added the exact same points of interest near the same location that I had done prior on 'Rua Doutor José Maria Antunes' for this change set, So as to not maintain a superfluous amount of POIs could you remove either one of each

Olá Ahchaa, percebi-me que adicionaste exactamente os mesmos pontos de interesse perto da mesma localização que eu tinha feito antes na "Rua Doutor José Maria Antunes' para este conjunto de alterações, de modo a não manter uma quantidade supérflua de PDI podes remover um de cada
kartler175 (2019-06-16 18:51:57+00:00): "Das Attibut wird nur an Linien des öffenlitchen Verkehrs verwendet; nicht an Haltestellen oder Bahnsteigen (highway=bus_stop / railway=platform / public_transport=platform …)": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:interval#Verwendung

Kein Einzelfall: http://overpass-turbo.eu/map.html?Q=%5Bout%3Axml%5D%0A%3B%0Anode%0A%20%20(47.584862909276%2C7.0353698730469%2C48.477473349056%2C8.9497375488281)%0A%20%20%5B%22interval%22~%22.%22%5D%3B%0Aout%20meta%20qt%3B
Dalkvist (2017-04-23 10:08:38+00:00): Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre.

 Några tip/kommentarer: 
När man karterat saker som bara har raka hörn, framförallt byggnader, så är det svårt att få det 100% rätt på fri hand. Det finns ett verktyg i editorn som gör det åt en, i ID som du använt har det kortkommandot “s”, finns också i menyn när man klickar på en linje.

Name fältet använder vi bara för egennamn ex på gata eller butik, om det är en beskrivning så är det bättre att lägga den i description eller note fältet, om det är företagaren som äger/driver så passer operator bättre.

Kallas parken för hälsans stig, om det är mer själva stigarna som kallas det så är det bättre att skapa en vandringsleds relation för den, mer info om dem på wikin https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:network%3Dlwn

Om du har några funderingar så får du gärna skicka ett meddelande till mig.
dudka (2017-05-05 12:28:16+00:00): для садових товариств краще використовувати тег place=allotments
zalex_ua (2017-05-05 12:42:13+00:00): ок, повернусь до цього питання як закінчу їх всі мапити, або десь по ходу поправлю. дякую за відгук
eggie (2017-04-22 18:57:25+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-22 18:58:45+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-22 19:02:17+00:00): Het is beter niet te beginnen met access=no. Je kunt dan wel aangeven wie dan nog wel op dat voetgangersgebied mogen komen.
HenriAJ (2017-04-22 19:03:46+00:00): Oké! Dank voor de tip.
eggie (2017-04-22 19:06:01+00:00): Dat access no hoeft er niet op.
Kijk hier voor de access tags. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands

De groene vakjes zijn default en hoeven dus niet getagd te worden. Dus wanneer je aaccess = no weghaalt kan foot=yes ook weg.
eggie (2017-04-22 19:07:21+00:00): Zie voorgaand commentaar.
HenriAJ (2017-04-22 19:10:21+00:00): Het gaat hier dus om een 'cycleway'.
HenriAJ (2017-04-22 19:12:20+00:00): Ik zal de tips zeker bekijken. Er verandert hier de laatste tijd veel. Voor het organiseren van wandelevenementen is een goed bijgewerkte kaart in ieder geval handig.
eggie (2017-04-22 19:13:20+00:00): Maar die zie ik niet. Je hebt highway=pedestrian getagd.
Die heeft nooit eenrichting...
Zal even inloggen en on line bekijken.
moment..
eggie (2017-04-22 19:17:06+00:00): Ik zie geen cycleway. Op de pedestrians die je hebt aangelegd mag gefietst worden, maar op het area=yes highway=pedestrian mag het niet. 
Wat bedoel je precies met cycleway?
eggie (2017-04-22 19:24:00+00:00): Het is voor de routering in ieder geval beter dat je die pedestrians door die vlakken maakt ander heb je alleen routering via de zijkanten van de vlakken. Dat ziet er niet logisch uit.
'k Zou wel al die overbodige acces-tags er afhalen.
woodpeck_repair (2017-04-22 20:43:16+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 45905812, 45905867, 45905968, 45906029, 45906050, 45906270, 45906462, 45907735, 45907927, 45908475, 45908508, 45909210, 45909357, 45909994, 45910273, 45933950, 45934898, 46456269, 46456281, 46456296, 46456304, 46456376, 46456386, 46456394, 46456488, 46456494, 46456500, 46456838, 46456862, 46456876, 46456907, 46456928, 46456934, 46456973, 46456999, 46457013, 46457028, 46457094, 46457100, 46457154, 46457167, 46457173, 46457183, 46457190, 46457200, 46457216, 46457242, 46457277, 46457282, 46457290, 46457309, 46457326, 46457345, 46457366, 46457376, 46457391, 46457402, 46457415, 46457424, 46457433, 46457456, 46457476, 46457488, 46457526, 46457538, 46457551, 46457557, 46457668, 46457703, 46457721, 46457732, 46457814, 46457834, 46457840, 46457845, 46457897, 46457928, 46457953, 46457971, 46457998, 46458014, 46458047, 46458113, 46458119, 46458143, 46458170, 46458182, 46458201, 46458214, 46458225, 46458233, 46458257, 46458266, 46458293, 46458308, 46458315, 46458352, 46458373, 46458412, 46458428, 46458449, 46458512, 46458532, 46458539, 46458547, 46458555, 46458567, 46458575, 46458580, 46458887, 46459037, 46459092, 46459131, 46459141, 46459150, 46459155, 46459195, 46459245, 46459253, 46459315, 46459342, 46459367, 46459486, 46459492, 46459510, 46459530, 46459540, 46459556, 46459564, 46459581, 46459602, 46459606, 46459633, 46459652, 46459659, 46459685, 46459694, 46459743, 46459904, 46459929, 46460706, 46460716, 46460731, 46460747, 46461629, 46461874, 46461912, 46461958, 46461972, 46461982, 46462117, 46462126, 46462142, 46462194, 46462221, 46462236, 46462253, 46462265, 46462290, 46462312, 46462337, 46462349, 46462375, 46462395, 46462649, 46462676, 46462703, 46462729, 46462763, 46462790, 46482015, 46482079, 46482763, 46482776, 46482788, 46482805, 46482822, 46482852, 46482992, 46483042, 46483056, 46483096, 46483104, 46483109, 46483119.
nammala (2017-04-26 06:41:29+00:00): Hi Gavinelo,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Wanted to inform that the swimming pool should be tagged as `leisure=swimming_pool` instead of `natural=water` . It would be great if you can make the change.
Happy Mapping.

Regards,
nammala
eggie (2017-04-22 19:19:19+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-22 19:36:30+00:00): name=2e etage 9C is geen goede tag die bij name= hoort.
Je zou zoiets wel op note=    kunnen zetten.
Wat is je bedoeling in deze?
eggie (2017-05-25 07:02:22+00:00): adressen BAG hersteld
eggie (2017-05-25 07:05:29+00:00): Soms liggen adresnodes op elkaar.. je ziet ze niet, maar ze zijn er wel. Graag zo laten. Geen name-tags erop met verduidelijking svp.
eggie (2017-04-22 19:54:26+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution
nikiforov (2017-04-22 22:28:43+00:00): Насчёт переименования того садика: на сайте деп. образования он как «ясла-садок» обозначен. 
http://aisrd.org/douview.aspx?douid=382&lang=uk-UA
Superadlen (2017-04-27 14:53:46+00:00): merci kho la3ziz https://www.facebook.com/groups/osmdz/
GerdP (2017-08-22 15:06:57+00:00): Hi!
I found a highway=b
on a building. Probably a typo, but what was meant?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488748261#map=19/38.34979/-6.68291
SomeoneElse (2017-05-07 15:09:24+00:00): Hello,
You've added a footpath https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488741439 .  Are you sure that that actually exists, and that there is really no access from it to the junction of Pelham Road / Regent Street?  Regent Street is sidewalk=both (or was the last time I went past it).  Are you really saying that there are two parallel paths here - the one associated with the road, and a separate one with no access to the road?  This seems very odd.
Best Regards,
Andy
VlIvYur (2017-05-07 23:45:32+00:00): Of course I'm not sure - at first, I have only Bing images.
Second, sidewalk=* is a temporary tag and should be replaced by drawn highway=footway. After that sidewalk=* may be removed, so there will be only one footway.
As for access from it to junction, I don't know local laws about crossing streets at any places so I didn't draw it.
SomeoneElse (2017-05-08 11:24:43+00:00): > Second, sidewalk=* is a temporary tag and should be replaced by drawn highway=footway. 

No, it's not a temporary tag.  It's a permanent tag to indicate that a sidewalk that is part of the road infrastructure exists.
Depending on the local environment it may be more appropriate to tag sidewalks using sidewalk=* on the road or as separate footways.  In most built-up areas in the UK sidewalk=* is more appropriate because the sidewalk is part of the road - there's just a kerb between the two.  Pedestrians can both legally and physically cross from the sidewalk on one side of the road to another at any point.  Mapping a road junction like https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=21&lat=53.1014321&lon=-1.2550828 completely misrepresents how pedestrians are allowed to use it.
Please don't let your (greatly appreciated!) enthusiasm for detailed mapping get away from the reality - aerial imagery can be misleading and out of date, and if you're unsure of the reality somewhere please do add map notes so that locals can verify the situation.
Richard Fairhurst summed it up really well (in a very different context): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-May/077993.html .
VlIvYur (2017-06-26 20:03:52+00:00): Sorry, I was too far from Internet
sidewalk=* are difficult to support (roll of tags on way) and didn't displays the real state of things. You can't tag slopes for wheelchair, different pavement, widths for sides etc. It's only path graph (for drivers) not map.
Why (For what?) there are marked crossings from one side to another (you said you can cross at any point)?
Alexander-II (2017-06-04 03:13:02+00:00): Правку откатываю. Читайте, как правильно использовать тег name и что такое landuse=forest. Вас уже поправляли раз, вы зачем-то снова сделали неверно.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest
PAscal_L (2017-04-22 20:00:18+00:00): dans ce groupe de modifications 48042962 j'ai supprimé tout le chemin du chateau fort, au lieu d'en supprimer un petit tronçon. Je ne sais pas revenir en arriére ;o( merci d'annuler cette modification
py_berrard (2017-04-22 22:39:40+00:00): rétabli
zstadler (2020-09-14 15:05:35+00:00): Hello Ynhockey,

In this edit you have added two lift gates:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4810347107
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4810347108

However, these nodes are not part of any road and it's not clear what they are gating.

Could you put it on the relevant road/s or delete the gates if it is not known?

Thanks!
Ynhockey (2020-09-14 19:35:25+00:00): It was too long ago to remember, it's probably a feature that exists in real life. Anyway, since I don't remember, I will delete them.
MCalaOSM (2024-06-21 09:51:31+00:00): Salve non si può creare un area senza aver averla identificata con tag specifici, in questo caso lei a già dichiara nella relazione poligonale quindi questa area e superflua può essere eliminata, o pure dall'alto sembrerebbe un atrio o cortile potrebbe mapparla così, altrimenti viene segnalata come da segnalazione errore ( osmose o keepright ) ecc...come da wiki, e qualcunaltro lo farà prima o poi. E approfitto della sua gentilezza  se posso fare ulteriori successive se necessario modifiche o miglioramenti/aggiornamento con la sua approvazione.
Nino Galante (2024-06-21 10:16:34+00:00): Ciao Mario, adesso ti rispondo un po' in fretta, giusto per dirti che quello che "sembra" un atrio o cortile è un atrio/cortile. Se ritieni che debba essere aggiunto qualche ulteriore tag/dettaglio per specificarlo o correttamente indicarlo fai pure; probabilmente la cosa a suo tempo mi è sfuggita e ti ringrazio per averlo segnalato. Fai tranquillamente se ritieni sia il caso altrimenti approfondiamo.
MCalaOSM (2024-06-21 11:28:05+00:00): Ti ringrazio possiamo fare entrambe, sia approfondire e modificare, altrettanto puoi fare tu  che mi piacerebbe visto che conosci bene il posto, e altrettanto dalle mie parti.
woodpeck_repair (2017-04-22 22:22:02+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 45905812, 45905867, 45905968, 45906029, 45906050, 45906270, 45906462, 45907735, 45907927, 45908475, 45908508, 45909210, 45909357, 45909994, 45910273, 45933950, 45934898, 46456269, 46456281, 46456296, 46456304, 46456376, 46456386, 46456394, 46456488, 46456494, 46456500, 46456838, 46456862, 46456876, 46456907, 46456928, 46456934, 46456973, 46456999, 46457013, 46457028, 46457094, 46457100, 46457154, 46457167, 46457173, 46457183, 46457190, 46457200, 46457216, 46457242, 46457277, 46457282, 46457290, 46457309, 46457326, 46457345, 46457366, 46457376, 46457391, 46457402, 46457415, 46457424, 46457433, 46457456, 46457476, 46457488, 46457526, 46457538, 46457551, 46457557, 46457668, 46457703, 46457721, 46457732, 46457814, 46457834, 46457840, 46457845, 46457897, 46457928, 46457953, 46457971, 46457998, 46458014, 46458047, 46458113, 46458119, 46458143, 46458170, 46458182, 46458201, 46458214, 46458225, 46458233, 46458257, 46458266, 46458293, 46458308, 46458315, 46458352, 46458373, 46458412, 46458428, 46458449, 46458512, 46458532, 46458539, 46458547, 46458555, 46458567, 46458575, 46458580, 46458887, 46459037, 46459092, 46459131, 46459141, 46459150, 46459155, 46459195, 46459245, 46459253, 46459315, 46459342, 46459367, 46459486, 46459492, 46459510, 46459530, 46459540, 46459556, 46459564, 46459581, 46459602, 46459606, 46459633, 46459652, 46459659, 46459685, 46459694, 46459743, 46459904, 46459929, 46460706, 46460716, 46460731, 46460747, 46461629, 46461874, 46461912, 46461958, 46461972, 46461982, 46462117, 46462126, 46462142, 46462194, 46462221, 46462236, 46462253, 46462265, 46462290, 46462312, 46462337, 46462349, 46462375, 46462395, 46462649, 46462676, 46462703, 46462729, 46462763, 46462790, 46482015, 46482079, 46482763, 46482776, 46482788, 46482805, 46482822, 46482852, 46482992, 46483042, 46483056, 46483096, 46483104, 46483109, 46483119.
MCDA (2017-04-22 22:44:28+00:00): Does this crossroads have a name?
derdritteachim (2017-04-22 21:56:06+00:00): Beschreibung ist Quatsch, wurde aus Versehen von einer älteren Bearbeitung an einer anderen Stelle übernommen. Hier eingefügt: Windsportbereiche auf dem Tempelhofer Feld.
Polarbear (2017-06-03 01:41:39+00:00): see comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47988833
Revert in 49210630
GerdP (2017-09-23 08:32:58+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed this changeset because of the tag highway=cavepassage which is only used here. 
I wonder if natural=cave fits better?
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/natural%3Dcave
woodpeck (2017-04-23 08:42:52+00:00): Can you explain why you reverted this edit? Did it break anything or was it otherwise wrong? Please make it a habit to explain such things directly in the changeset comment when you revert something unless it is totally obvious.
Kostik (2017-04-23 09:43:42+00:00): Были удалены отношения которые не стоило удалять. Причём без должного комментария почему это было сделано. Я вернул нужные мне мультиполигоны.

Relations have been removed are not worth removing. And without proper commentary why it was done. I returned I needed multipolygons.
Superadlen (2017-04-27 14:34:33+00:00): merci kho la3ziz https://www.facebook.com/groups/osmdz/
Commodoortje (2017-04-23 07:05:16+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-04-23 07:07:19+00:00): Ik heb je eerste edit een beetje geholpen.
► ik heb de poi samengevoegd met de adresnode.
► Diverse aanvullingen verricht.
.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48051797
Je zou zelf nog meer informatie kunnen aanbrengen. Kijk dan op deze wiki pagina.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=clothes
powergirls (2017-04-23 11:09:03+00:00): powergirls-power is een online winkel voor dames met een maatje meer.of leuke kleding voor weinig waar je wel wat aan heb.Of zo als ze vroeger wel zijden op de markt is je gulden een daalder waard
Glassman (2017-04-23 01:37:06+00:00): When adding street names, we use the full spelling, no abbreviations. The reason is that software has a hard time un-abbreviating. I updated your edits.
Wulfmorn (2018-11-12 21:39:25+00:00): Hello. You seem to have added the street name as the maxspeed value on this road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488773996
Miselajus (2017-05-02 20:58:04+00:00): Hallo,
Bitte versehe deine Eintragungen mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren!
Gruß M.
t2425b (2017-05-03 14:02:30+00:00): Okay, ich werde daran denken! Gibt es unklare Änderungen?
Владимир К (2018-02-14 11:15:47+00:00): о какой новой информации речь? зачем вы удалили тег addr:suburb?
Takuto (2017-07-04 09:16:03+00:00): Добрый день. Подскажите, на основании какого источника вы исправили береговую линию Должанской косы? Все снимки косы сильно устарели, я наносил ее по данным GPS трекинга.
Glassman (2017-04-23 22:04:08+00:00): I went ahead and deleted this random untagged way. Remember, when you save and upload an edit, it goes live. If you want to practice editing, take the iD walk through on your browser. http://learnosm.org also has good articles on how to edit OSM. 

If you have any questions, just ask.
woodpeck (2017-04-23 08:16:23+00:00): What is wrong with you? For the third time now I have asked you to explain why you consider this to "not be a park" when the Long Beach municipal web site clearly lists it as a park - and you would think they should know better, no?
thomaswest7891 (2017-04-28 23:20:14+00:00): this was put as a park, someone with out being named wants the game pokemon go to spawn more pokemon. it is just a grassy area not a park.
woodpeck (2017-04-29 16:25:20+00:00): Ok I'll use simpler language. This area was put as a park. Because it is a park. The City of Long Beach thinks this is a park. They have a description of this park on their web site. Many parks are really just grassy areas. But this grassy area is a park. Please leave it.
k1wi (2017-05-20 09:41:14+00:00): Reverted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48839176
Jothirnadh (2017-04-25 10:47:10+00:00): Hello mholiv,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap, really appreciate your work. In this particular changeset, you added buildings which are existing in per Bing imagery but the tags you added says Bing aerial imagery. Can you please confirm the source you are using to map these buildings.
Happy mapping!
Jothirnadh
mholiv (2017-04-25 20:34:42+00:00): My apologies but I have made a mistake. The reference imagery is from private HOA documentation in my possession. Once bing images updates, I would be happy to update and small discrepancies that may exist.
Jothirnadh (2017-04-26 05:02:59+00:00): Wow great, thanks for responding back. Let me know if you need help, once again welcome to OpenStreetMap and happy mapping.
Polarbear (2017-06-03 02:01:01+00:00): Du hast hier versehentich das ganze Schulgelände als 'building' getaggt. Auch hat das Gebäude nicht 2, sondern 3 Stockwerke (Foto Schulwebseite).
Inzwischen sind die Gebäude im Geoportal/DOP 2016 und ALKIS zu sehen. 
Korrigiert.
Commodoortje (2017-04-23 06:55:57+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleren middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-04-23 06:59:28+00:00): Revert due to ignorance
Je had een adresnode gewijzigd van nr 16 naar 23.
Vermoedelijk deed je dit per ongeluk met maps.me.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/bkqx6yir4p6lxgu/2017-04-23_08-57-55.jpg?raw=1
tonyf1 (2017-04-23 05:50:42+00:00): maybe internet_access=wlan
tonyf1 (2017-04-23 06:32:03+00:00): and internet_access:operator=Brisbane City Council
Ian TF (2017-04-23 06:35:29+00:00): Thanks Tonyf1, this is my first interaction with Open Street Maps so am feeling my way.  I will have a go at changing the naming to what you suggest.