piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-04-30 19:37:32+00:00): Uzasadnienie podane w opisie edycji jest wadliwe.

Klasyfikacja w OSM nie jest kopiowaniem klasyfikacji urzędniczej czy stanu drogi.
NieWnen (2022-05-12 13:42:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120849553
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
bisonprarieafternoon (2022-04-26 21:49:10+00:00): Hello it would be more proper to do

"building=yes
name=Burger King
amenity=fast_food
brand=Burger King
brand:wikidata=Q177054
cuisine=burger
takeaway=yes"

For Burger King, you are using the ID editor if you search burger king it will actually put all this information in for the building.
bisonprarieafternoon (2022-04-26 21:51:14+00:00): Hello, the name "Four Season RV Park should be used to tag the whole RV park not just the swimming pool. The name field is not to describe who owns a given object.
eggie (2022-04-27 12:28:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Leo Slager (2022-04-27 12:28:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2022-04-27 13:26:40+00:00): Ahh .. een dubbel welkom!!!  Nooit weg.  :)
user_15723033 (2022-04-27 21:17:06+00:00): Hallo :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
4004 (2022-04-29 21:56:23+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
turning_loop уже не надо, если отрисовывать отдельную дорогу, turning_loop это для расширения дороги
bisonprarieafternoon (2022-04-26 21:58:42+00:00): Same issue as with your Burger King edit if you search for Dollar General the ID editor will plug in a lot of the information needed.
Will look something like this
"building=yes
name=Dollar General
brand=Dollar General
brand:wikidata=Q145168
shop=variety_store"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-05-04 08:07:11+00:00): نرجوا منك عدم إدخال أماكن غير صحيحة للخريطة العامة
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 11:14:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122245102 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some dubious-source edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6058 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
krusefahrer (2022-04-27 16:24:06+00:00): May I remove the source=Corine tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139590011/history ?
b-unicycling (2022-04-27 16:45:52+00:00): Yes, that is a very strange mistake indeed.i haven't a ue how that could have happened.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_177389 (2022-04-27 15:30:54+00:00): This changeset was reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120265363
(reverted changeset that accidentally displaced 1000s of nodes by 100s of kms)
user_177389 (2022-04-28 02:21:19+00:00): this changeset was reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120263231
user_177389 (2022-04-28 02:31:41+00:00): this changeset was reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120282210
user_177389 (2022-04-28 13:39:40+00:00): This thangeset was reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120298596
user_177389 (2022-04-28 14:27:28+00:00): This changeset was reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120308985
user_177389 (2022-04-28 15:11:48+00:00): This changeset was reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120310728
user_177389 (2022-04-28 15:14:59+00:00): This changeset was reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120307949
user_177389 (2022-04-28 13:42:33+00:00): This changeset was reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120302578
etu (2022-04-26 23:04:08+00:00): Something went catastrophically wrong here, not possible to download this area from the server any more
tekim (2022-05-12 14:45:17+00:00): It seems that all of this information is also available in a guidebook and associated website: https://eastbayhillpeople.com/guidebook/
Is the Park District also asking the guidebook author and publisher to stop selling and distributing this book?
danieldegroot2 (2022-05-12 15:35:02+00:00): Hey Jaski Singh,

For discussions regarding sensitive data, please contact the following working groups:

OSM US Trails Working Group
Mainly regarding the trails around such areas.
https://www.openstreetmap.us/2021/12/osmus-trails-working-group

OSMF Data Working Group
Regarding removal -redaction- of data and any disputes.
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group

Regards,

Daniel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
MoiraPrime (2022-06-23 19:56:37+00:00): Hey Uhaul, I appreciate your interest in going across the US and adding your neighborhood dealers. Please do keep in mind to try to tag things correctly. I've updated the location in this changeset to their proper tags so that they may serve as an example if you need it for reference.

If a Uhaul location is a local dealer inside of another business (like a storage rental place like this one) it's a good idea to map it as a point instead of an area. Also, in the default editor there should be a preset for U-Haul rentals as well.
MxxCon (2022-04-27 05:04:57+00:00): Hello.
Please note that crosswalks controlled by traffic lights should be tagged as "traffic_signals" type.
"marked" type is intended for crosswalks with a stop sign. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120233310
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-20 21:07:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121260282 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some implausible mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5998 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6004 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-20 21:07:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121260282 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some implausible mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5998 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6004 .
Marcos Dione (2022-07-09 16:10:16+00:00): Bonjour. Pour quoi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85315125 a foot=no?
A67-A67 (2022-04-27 10:47:54+00:00): Dit is incorrect. De snelheidslimiet is niet altijd 120 km/h, alleen tussen 19:00 uur en 6:00 uur. Overdag is het 100 km/h. Zie de volgende pagina over afspraken hoe dit getagd moet worden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Reduced_speed_limit_on_Dutch_motorways

Ik heb de correcte snelheden weer teruggezet.
Ernie1964 (2022-04-27 17:37:51+00:00): Bedankt voor de check en de correctie (duimpje). Dit was mij niet bekend. Ook zag ik op diverse plekken de max snelheid (vandaar mijn correctie), maar dat zullen dan de invoegstroken zijn geweest. Mvg Ernie1964.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Diacritic (2022-04-27 04:35:52+00:00): Hi Jw1t,

Thanks for the edit!

I've slightly adjusted what you've modified: I've changed highway=residential to highway=footway, as that would appear to be the best tagging.

If you hvae any questions or would like to know more about editing, get in touch!

Dian
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120234311
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
mariotomo (2022-04-27 12:29:33+00:00): hola, me quitas una duda? no sé qué quiere decir "PH" y lo he visto en varias ocasiones aquí en Panamá.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
felipeeugenio (2022-04-27 22:34:32+00:00): Estimado, por favor contactar a la comuinidad local de OSM para entender un poco el proyecto. Las ediciones están muy por bajo el estándar.
saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
MKLAW (2022-05-01 16:58:29+00:00): 麻煩請不要因'土名事件'而矯枉過正,謝謝 :)
J-MUC (2022-04-30 18:51:55+00:00): Hi PopeyePopcord,

This adds a barrier=yes to node #1775578338. Is that intentional? A barrier at the middle of an intersection seems kind of strange.

Thanks!

Kind regards,

J-MUC
A67-A67 (2022-05-08 22:54:32+00:00): Hallo R_S,

Dit zijn normale kruisingen, geen op/afritten of bypasses. Hiervoor gebruiken we gewoon het wegtype van de kruisende weg. Ik heb het hier verbeterd.
R_S (2022-05-09 01:39:26+00:00): Weet u zeker dat dat klopt?
Als ik kijk naar de uitleg op de OSM Wiki pagina zouden mijn edits volgens voorschrift zijn, kijkend naar afbeelding 3 onder examples.
Persoonlijk lijkt het me ook logisch dat het betreffende deel van de weg de classificatie en naam aanhoud van de daadwerkelijke weg waarop zij zich bevind. Soms kom ik wegdelen tegen waar de het deel weg een de naam en classificatie van de kruisende straat dragen bijv. Kerkstraat terwijl de straat waarop je je op je navigatie zou bevinden toch echt de Schoolstraat zou zijn.
Hoe dan ook willen we allemaal het juiste niet? :)
R_S (2022-05-09 01:39:56+00:00): Ter aanvulling de URL van de OSM Wiki pagina waarover ik sprak:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary_link
A67-A67 (2022-05-09 11:58:17+00:00): Ja dat weet ik zeker en dit is ook meerdere keren op het forum besproken. De meeste Nederlandse steden zijn ook correct getagd. Er zijn wel wat achterblijfselen uit de AND-import, waarbij het hoogste wegtype zonder link (dus hier secondary) is gebruikt. Dit moet verbeterd worden.

Je bevindt je namelijk op het verlengde van kruisende weg, niet op de hoofdweg waarvoor je eerste 90 graden moet draaien. Die classificatie houden we aan, zowel bij kruispunten als t-splitsingen.

Het secondary_link-artikel geeft voorbeelden van gekanaliseerde delen van een kruispunt (bypasses), waarbij je voor de kruising zelf al afslaat. Daar is hier geen sprake van.

Voor de navigatie is het ook beter. Zo voorkom je meldingen als "Sla linksaf naar de Graaf Hendrik III laan", terwijl dat de straatnaam rechtdoor is.
mariotomo (2022-04-27 12:37:33+00:00): en Panamá hacen falta trazas GPS, que son necesarias para corregir el alineamiento de las fotos aéreas.
permíteme una sugerencia para las próximas visitas: 
podrías grabar las calles visibles en las fotos. algo como estas trazas que grabé hace tiempo, pagando un taxi para que me llevara:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mariotomo/traces/1285428
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mariotomo/traces/1831843
gracias!
mariotomo (2022-04-27 12:26:09+00:00): hola, que bien que puedas mapear habiendo visitado la zona! podrías revisar los senderos a uso agricola que quedaron cruzando estos dos edificios gigantes que añadiste? o si quieres tenemos una chat en Telegram, que es el medio más utilizado en Latinoamérica.
iandees (2022-04-27 01:37:27+00:00): Hello! Please try to fill in a useful changeset description message when you're saving your changes. It helps others around you (like me) understand your change. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120234953
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-20 21:07:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121260282 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some implausible mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5998 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6004 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-20 21:07:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121260282 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some implausible mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5998 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6004 .
aharvey (2022-04-30 07:28:34+00:00): I added the turn:lanes tagging and tweaked a bit per Maxar imagery which appears to show more recent changes to lanes https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120374112
WoodWoseWulf (2022-04-27 04:29:40+00:00): Hi!
Welcome to OSM
The name tag should be reserved for actual names of things rather than descriptions.
Object properties can be described using appropriate tagging such as sport=basketball or leisure=playground