piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2019-06-15 15:41:07+00:00): review:
Misschien beter om de tag amenity=parking_entrance te gebruiken. En de node op de kruising van highway en gebouw te plaatsen
gpvos (2019-06-15 15:50:44+00:00): Ik herinner me dat de editor (iD) dit wel eens aanbood in bepaalde situaties (en het is ook makkelijker voor de computer om het snijpunt precies uit te rekenen), want ik had het graag gedaan.

De P is nog steeds niet zichtbaar op osm.org, enig idee wat je daarvoor moet doen?
Leo Slager (2019-06-15 16:32:44+00:00): ik maak wat aanpassingen.
Leo Slager (2019-06-15 16:43:08+00:00): De weg vastgemaakt aan het gebouw, (hoe vreemd mij dat ook lijkt).
De node voorzien van amenity=parking_entrance
parking=underground.
Maximaal inzoomen en het Psymbool is zichtbaar.
gpvos (2019-06-15 17:34:41+00:00): Het is een behoorlijk grote parkeergarage (zeker twee nivo's onder het hele gebouw), dus jammer dat ie, althans op osm.org, minder zichtbaar is dan de andere parkeerterreinen in de buurt. Maar ach. (En ik ben geen kenner van dit gebied.)
Leo Slager (2019-06-15 22:35:28+00:00): gegevens aangevuld met:
capacity=460
opening_hours
BCNorwich (2019-06-15 13:28:32+00:00): Hi, what makes you think this is a park when it looks like most of the other building. around here?
Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-06-20 07:56:47+00:00): No response so I've changed the tag.
Rainero (2019-06-17 20:02:08+00:00): Hallo hadico,

willkommen bei OSM !
Du hast um Überprüfung des Edits gebeten, deshalb kommentiere ich hier.

Wenn der Weg zugewachsen und nicht mehr begehbar ist, ist es in Ordnung ihn zu löschen. Daher m.E. alles in in Ordnung mit der Änderung.

Viel Spaß weiterhin bei und mit Openstreetmap.

Servus,
Rainer
hadico (2019-06-18 07:39:46+00:00): Danke!
Hans-Dieter
আফতাবুজ্জামান (2019-06-22 22:21:44+00:00): ভাই, আল্লার ওয়াস্তে মিনতি করি, প্রাথমিক নাম (যেটা name: ... ) বাংলায় দেন। ইংরেজি নাম name:en এর ভিতর দেন।
BCNorwich (2019-06-15 13:33:28+00:00): Hi, best not to map stuff you're not sure of.
FredrikEdler (2019-06-17 06:37:33+00:00): Stien du slettet var ikke tegnet fra "kartverket N50"
daglof (2019-06-17 06:53:39+00:00): Hei,
Det var det som var satt som source. Spiller ingen rolle, for jeg vet godt at sånn stien var tegnet inn ikke finnes. Jeg har bodd 50 meter nedenfor 25 år av mitt liv.
Zabir91 (2019-06-23 15:44:04+00:00): (Please do not add english name in the name=* field, always use name=* for Bengali name and name:en=* for English name.)

A whole standard entry would include:

name=<Bangla>
name:bn=<Bangla>
name:en=<English>

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Bangladesh
SomeoneElse (2019-06-26 15:33:34+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you've removed the "shop=yes" tag from http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=576014357 .  Have you added anything that indicates that there is actually a shop of some sort there?
Best Regards,
Andy
Privatemajory (2019-06-27 06:51:54+00:00): Hello Andy. 
I was confused as these were listed in Osmose issues (http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/Privatemajory). However, I've just checked and the tag seems to be in use and shouldn't be a problem. Now I regret I "fixed" these "issues". Please take my apologies and feel free to revert my changesets if needed.
Sincerely,
Dolly
SomeoneElse (2019-06-27 08:26:26+00:00): Hello,
Unfortunately Osmose's suggestions aren't always something you can use to "fix" with directly.  In some cases it might be clear from imagery (including Mapillary or similar) that there's a convenience store there, but most of the time it's just a prompt for a local survey.
I'll revert this, but there may be some changes in here that are local to you or that you can verify with imagery that you can then reapply.
Sorry for the inconvenience!
Best Regards,
Andy
user_6110846 (2020-04-09 06:03:46+00:00): даремна робота 
у адміністративно територіальному ус трої має бути Лиманська громада 
почитайте уважно вікіпедію та усі посиланння які я додав 
Лимансьбкий район не скасований але він перетворений у пустишку 
у пустишку того що усі населені пункти району передані під управління Лиманської громади 
Рано чи пізнео чи ви чи хтосьб інший виявить помилку та поверне як було
SomeoneElse (2019-06-27 09:59:00+00:00): Hello,
One more question - I'm not sure what is meant by "orthograph" here?  Is it to do with correcting the way that tall buildings have been traced?
Best Regards,
Andy
Privatemajory (2019-06-27 12:30:40+00:00): No, it's not about the shape, it's about likely bad written key/value. For example, Osmose signals all name=* values written all in uppercase, probably with the argument that acronyms should go to short_name=* and name=* shouldn't have an acronym.
Privatemajory (2019-06-27 12:38:53+00:00): What I changed in this changeset, in "name":
TOTAL -> Total
SHELL -> Shell
Chateau d'Eau -> Château d'Eau
BANGWE LAMDJI -> Bangwe Lamdji
Hotel de Ville de Tahoua -> Hôtel de Ville de Tahoua
SomeoneElse (2019-06-27 12:47:13+00:00): Are all of those name changes, especially the french accents, really valid?  I can think of lots of old placenames that started out as one language but became incorpororated into a second more recent language - think of all the french-based names in the USA, for example - many of those no longer use french accents or honour french grammar rules.  It's only really safe to make thse sort of changes if you've either visited the place in question or otherwise know that they really are spelt wrong.
Another problem is that the name might not be correct in the first place - I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2779075493 isn't really a name at all, just a description.
Best Regards,
Andy
Privatemajory (2019-06-27 13:31:55+00:00): You're right. But here the objects are in french speaking countries that's why I'm quite sure it was a typo.
About the names, yes "Château d'Eau" and "Station Shell" or "Station Total" seem to be just descriptions but I'm not sure about that, as I haven't seen what's displayed in the field.
jaap de vries (2019-06-17 09:31:39+00:00): Beste,
Een groot aantal huizen staat nog op construction, als ze af zijn construction tag er af of bouwterrein weer terug.

Jaap
jaap de vries (2019-06-17 09:33:36+00:00): Dit geldt ook voor de aanwezige straten die ook nog de tag construction hebben.
eggie (2019-06-15 15:00:30+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.. Er was hier al een camping gemapt. Ik heb één verwijderd. 
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 14:45:48+00:00): Hello tmmanish,
The service road at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697340994 does not actually exist and has not done so for some time.  What source did you use when adding it?  Was it really a GPS trace from an Amazon delivery?
The area's being redeveloped - the result will I suspect include some new-build and access to the sports fields, but it's not clear yet as redevelopment has not started yet.
Also, the "track" at entry is most certainly not motor_vehicle=yes (the same issue as 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71502012 ).
Best Regards,
Andy
tmmanish (2019-07-05 16:35:24+00:00): Hi Andy,

Thanks for the response. This edit was made 20 days back when the update was not given to us on not adding motor_vehicle tag. Also the team is working on reverting back all the data which we added previously. Hoping to complete it by end of next week.. In this particular case, yes our delivery agent had travelled through this road which was validated with the 2016 satellite imagery and added this road. Do you know since when the building is closed? If you believe this is a wrong edit I can revert my changes based on your local knowledge.

Regards,
tmmanish
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 17:00:20+00:00): The building there was most recently used (about 10 years ago?) as changing rooms to the cricket pitch.  I added that building to OSM in 2013 (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241047440/history for details) and it was boarded up then.  

>  In this particular case, yes our delivery agent had travelled through this road

Frankly, I simply don't believe this statement.

Best Regards,
Andy
tmmanish (2019-07-05 18:02:43+00:00): Hi Andy,

Reverting the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute and deleted service road as per the request. Thanks for pointing out the error.

Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71941330

Regards,
tmmanish
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 19:15:13+00:00): Thanks.  Next time I'm walking past the old gate I'll try and update it with what the current situation is (it's very different to the imagery; not sure if the old Miners Welfare building is still there).
eggie (2019-06-15 15:05:11+00:00): phone even aangepast met +31 conform afspraken binnen OSM
Bedankt voor je bijdrage.
Gr Eggie
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 16:20:53+00:00): Hello,
It looks like the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603158186/history here has the same issue as previously described at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71674971 .  Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?
Best Regards,
Andy
pddondet (2019-07-05 17:29:26+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.

Changeset: 71940213

Regards,
pddondet
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 19:42:50+00:00): Thanks.  There are a few others that you were the last editor of - see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/KvC .
Hjart (2019-06-15 15:55:22+00:00): Why did you tag everything surface=soil ?
letihu (2019-10-15 19:58:25+00:00): Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6549441202/history
und hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6549425555/history
hast du 2 gleiche nodes übereinander eingetragen. Nur Einer reicht und sollte auch mit dem Weg verbunden sein. Nur einen Namen zu vergeben ist leider auch nicht hilfreich. Vielleicht schaust du hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dgate
mal, wie du Barrieren besser mappen kannst.
Supaplex (2019-06-15 18:01:15+00:00): duplicated
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286651774
viloan (2019-06-15 15:15:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 15:41:56+00:00): Hello,
The change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582038397/history looks like it's got the same issue that was previously discussed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70519397 .   Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?
Best Regards,
Andy
hemasvn (2019-07-05 17:40:22+00:00): Hi, 

Thanks for your suggestion. As per you request I am reverting back my edits made on access tags. Do let me know if you have any further questions.

Changeset #71940643
Regards,
hemasvn
eggie (2019-06-15 16:00:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Probeer svp aan te geven wat je edits zijn.
Wanneer een weg een andere weg snijdt dien je altijd een verbinding te maken middels een node.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-15 16:12:47+00:00): Ik heb even een verbinding gemaakt met het kruisende fietspad.
roezoe (2019-06-16 05:26:45+00:00): er klopt nog iets niet.
met inzoomen  verdwijnt het nieuwe stukje weg.
eggie (2019-06-16 06:55:58+00:00): Oke... dat komt omdat de rendering in de verschillende zoomniveaus nog tijd nodig heeft. Ook helpt het vaak om even je cache leeg te maken. F5 of een beetje in- en uitzoomen. Verder gewoon veel geduld. De humanitarian layer is vaak sneller om resultaat te zien.
viloan (2019-06-15 15:42:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
MichaelCollinson (2019-06-23 19:28:18+00:00): Hi Rudiger, You have marked a large section of the Roslagsbanan as "tunnel". It is not in a tunnel. Perhaps a short section only? Please check and, if necessary, break the way where your tunnel starts and ends. Thanks and happy mapping! Mike
Rudiger Eichler (2019-06-26 09:28:31+00:00): Hi Mike ! That must have been a mistake. I just wanted to change the "route" of the rails to the new one. There is no tunnel for "Roslagsbanan" between "Hägernäs strand" and "Rydbo". But it passes under the HIghway E18 and the road 274. I will see if I can find the mistake and remove it, but it is not that know of that I did. I.e. place the "Roslagsbanan" in a long tunnel. Regards Rudiger
eggie (2019-06-15 16:02:57+00:00): Een toren kunje aangeven middels een node tourism=viewpoint
name=toren hoort er zeker niet op. Bij een amenity=bench zet je ook niet name=bankje.
eggie (2019-06-15 16:17:37+00:00): Een bouwwerk is het zeker. Of het een gebouw is dat is maar de vraag. Ik heb tourism vieuwpoint toegevoegd. name=toren heb ik verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
alphensebezorger (2019-06-15 19:59:11+00:00): Ook namens mij welkom bij OSM.

Blijkbaar zit "man_made=tower" niet in de gebruikte edtor (iD) ingebouwd. Handmatig intypen bij alle tags kan wel.
We houden ons ook aanbevolen voor informatie over paden/wegen om de "uitkijktoen" te bereiken.

Vriendelijke groet, alphensebezorger.
mapman44 (2019-06-15 21:35:12+00:00): May I suggest using one of the editors that most OSM mappers use - iD in your web browser is fairly simple and straightforward, or JOSM which most veteran mappers use. It has a bit of a learning curve but has many abilities that iD doesn't have yet.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71283012
Happy Hobo (2019-06-16 01:02:26+00:00): Those won't work "on location."  I use ID to fix the errors when I return home.  I may install JOSM one of these days.
eggie (2019-06-15 16:04:48+00:00): Gebouwen worden niet zelf ingetekend in OSM. Het is allemaal import vanuit het Kadaster. er wordt periodiek geupdated.

Je kunt wel een verzoek doen op het forum op OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. De import wordt dan geregeld.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-15 16:22:10+00:00): Eigenlijk horen de dedrijfsnamen niet op de gebouwen, maar op de adresnodes.
Een bedrijfsnaam is niet de naam van een gebouw. Kerken en paleizen hebben wel gebouwnamen.
Vraag je zelf een BAG update aan in het draadje Verzoek BAG import?
Inlog identiek aan OSM account.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
MVG,
Eggie
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-18 07:45:08+00:00): Hi, Quả Chuối Tái. I think the classification of the road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/697354573) isn't correct. So, I modified it based on Maxar Premium Imagery
eggie (2019-06-15 16:33:42+00:00): Klopt, want op de laatste satellietfoto van  is nog geen weg te zien die gereed is. 
oneway=no hoort je beschrijving te zijn  die bij je edit hoort. Niet dat verhaal hierboven :)
oneway=no wordt niet getagd op reguliere wegen.
oneway=no eraf halen svp.
Kijk even op satellietdataportaal.nl
Wegen waar aan gewerkt wordt zetten we op highway=construction construction=unclassified
eggie (2019-06-15 16:35:23+00:00): https://satellietdataportaal.nl/
maraf24 (2019-06-18 13:44:06+00:00): This doesn't make sens to me. ref is a tag for a reference number of the object. You are putting reference number of nearby road. This is different object.
stanton (2019-06-30 15:25:11+00:00): I see the wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmilestone was recently updated with content which was not there at the time of this changeset.

My use case is that I am trying to make sense of locations such as “km 36 on DK3”, commonly used by road administrations. For this I would need an easy way to identify all milestones along DK3, pick the one with the desired distance, and determine its position.

On dual-carriageway roads, common practice seems to be to place milestones between the two carriageways, not connected to either. Without a tag indicating the road to which the milestone belongs, establishing the link becomes very complex.

Looking the existing data in Poland, there are 35,000+ milestones. Almost all of them have a ref=* tag pointing to the road (which includes my own edits, 97 nodes in total); only 87 nodes have no ref tag set.

One can argue whether ref=* is the correct tag to use for that, as it is the reference number of the road, not of the milestone. I have put this out for discussion at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:highway%3Dmilestone#Use_of_.7B.7Btag.7Cref.7D.7D.
user_3022894 (2019-06-15 16:46:20+00:00): tschuldigung, siehe https://westnordost.de/p/2594.jpg

und

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1750662
tux67 (2019-06-16 13:14:53+00:00): Hallo angelsoft
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Du hattest ein review requested. Grundsätzlich gilt, daß das Name Tag nicht verwendet wird um ein Objekt zu beschreiben. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
Eine Garage bekommt nicht den Namen Garage sondern building=garage
ansonsten kannst du noch das description Tag verwenden. 
Grunsätzlich stellt sich die Frage warum du das bei einem aufgelassenen Gelände mappen willst. Da wäre allenfalls noch old_name eine Option.
Da es sich bei OSM um ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt handelt, bitte ich um Rückmeldung hier im Änderungssatz. Bitte gib immer einen aussagefähigen Änderungssatzklommentar sowie eine Quellenangabe an.
Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
tux67 (2019-06-17 13:36:24+00:00): Hello Angelsoft, welcome to Openstreetmap and thank you for helping to improve map data. You had a review requested. Basically, the tag "name" is not used to describe an object. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
A garage does not get the name garage but building = garage otherwise you can still use the description tag. 
The question arises why you want to map that in an abandoned area (like the old JHQ) at all. At most, the old_name tag would be an option to be used here. Since OSM is a joint project, I would kindly ask for youre feedback here in the changeset comments. Please always provide a meaningful change set headline and your source of knowledge.

BR
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71284513
Hb- (2021-07-07 16:30:10+00:00): Hello, by deleting the separate tourism=viewpoint node and adding tourism=attraction to the natural=peak node this node does not show up as "peak" anymore in Nominatim/JOSM search. That is bad.
felipeeugenio (2019-10-07 11:04:10+00:00): a swimming pool as a lake? the fact that you have 12k+ editions scares me a lot
tudacs (2019-11-05 09:09:06+00:00): Im Changeset ergeben sich einige Fragen für mich, z.B. die `access*=*` an der Mühlschneise, insbes. da sie Teil einiger Relationen ist, wie auch `highway=footway` am Wald-Polygonzug.

Ich reverte das `highway=footway` in Changeset 76633691. Bei besserem Wissen bitte mit Note versehen :).
tordans (2019-06-16 05:26:11+00:00): Hallo johndoe, die Node unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4381117512 ist im Rahmen dieses Changesets verstümmelt. Ich kenne mich aber nicht aus, wie man das korrigiert. Aber so wie sie jetzt ist, macht sie nicht viel Sinn als freischwebender Name :-). Kannst du dir das nochmal anschauen? Danke!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71285562
johndoe (2019-06-16 16:06:02+00:00): Hallo tordans,
die Stops in der Relation #4576983 sehen verschieden aus. Ich weiß nicht sorecht, was dafür das beste Tagging ist!

Gruß
johndoe
tordans (2019-06-16 16:34:34+00:00): Danke, Johndoe, ich habe es unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1815048 dokumentiert. Vielleicht kann jemand den Faden wieder aufnehmen. VG
user_5359 (2019-06-16 15:25:31+00:00): Hello! Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26524104/history. What is the meaning of "add:v" = "Brundall" ?
freebeer (2019-06-16 16:13:21+00:00): moin georg,

the first entry below gives the answer i guessed as correct based on failed autocompletion:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684438454

and it even bears the same village name :-)
Robert Whittaker (2019-06-17 08:25:01+00:00): Yes, it looks like a typo in "addr" meant that the auto-completion I was expecting didn't happen. Now corrected to addr:village=Brundall.
viloan (2019-06-15 18:14:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
santamariense (2019-06-15 20:24:09+00:00): Essa rua não é (mais) de mão única?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71285904
Svalbard (2019-06-17 14:59:17+00:00): Hej archie, what was wrong with „payment:credit_cards=yes“?
Greetings Svalbard
archie (2019-06-17 17:58:48+00:00): payment:credit_cards=yes is deemed to be an error by JOSM. In wiki this tag shall be used in the following manner: "This should be mainly used when credit cards are not accepted. If cards are accepted, please indicate which by using a more specific key. ". See further: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment#Credit_cards