piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-08-03 11:10:21+00:00): Beste Jim.. In OSM hebben we alleen adresnodes. Dus geen adressen op de gebouwomtrek.
In het Kadaster kun je checken of de adressering klopt.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=oosterweg%2023&resultOffset=0&objectId=0398100000039288&geometry.x=119259.298&geometry.y=519741.50600042&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0398010000030139

Wanneer is niet klopt kun je een terugmelding doen bij het Kadaster.
Doe je zelf een terugmelding. Even op het potloodje klikken.
Iets zelf aanpassen heeft geen zin, want bij periodieke updates staat alles gewoon weer zoals het Kadaster aangeeft.
Ik haal je toevoeging weg.

Maak je zelf een terugmelding bij het Kadaster? 
De volgorde van het Kadaster zelf is niet erg logisch. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-03 11:15:50+00:00): Hier zie je wat er bij een BAGupdate
gebeurt https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122031645#map=17/52.66397/4.86023

en
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122031645

Tijd dus voor een terugmelding.
eggie (2022-08-04 11:03:07+00:00): okay
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:16:01+00:00): Thank you for the feedback.
Luca Moiana (2022-08-03 15:47:51+00:00): perché hai spezzato in due la strada che prima era continua?
pianolente (2022-08-03 20:33:38+00:00): forse non hai visto la situazione precedente: i segmenti che partono da Via Don Antonio Balbi erano segnati come strada in costruzione, ora invece ho editato perchè sono stati parti; non si può assolutamente sostenere che sia collegata a Via Giovanni XXIII senza soluzione di continuità, non c'è un semplice "cancello" ma proprio il collegamento stradale non esiste
Luca Moiana (2022-08-03 15:48:37+00:00): Per quale motivo hai traslato tute queste geometire?
pianolente (2022-08-03 20:36:10+00:00): ho fatto degli spostamenti millimetrici per editare correttamente la rotonda, poi ho rimesso come era nella mappa word clarity, roba di pochissimo comunque, ma di che traslazioni parli?
Luca Moiana (2022-08-04 07:32:44+00:00): Se lo verifichi su Achavi vedi che le strade vicine sono traslate, probabilmente a causa di qualche nodo connesso alla rotonda
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:29:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Luca Moiana (2022-08-03 15:50:48+00:00): l'edificio industriale sporge dall'area industriale, devi correggere per renderle coerenti
pianolente (2022-08-03 20:40:51+00:00): ok ho corretto; quell'edificio ha una forma un pò strana
IlBano (2022-11-05 15:56:55+00:00): Ciao aldoct.
In riferimento alla way a senso unico 221388399 in uscita dalla rotatoria, il tag lanes:backward=2 non è corretto. Puoi verificare e correggere ?
Grazie

IlBano
aldoct (2022-11-07 13:03:53+00:00): Grazie della segnalazione. Fatto
SekeRob (2022-08-04 19:22:21+00:00): Hi

You changed track to unclassified but left the track:type grading on it and from space in ESRI imagery it sure looks like track to me and entering from the north end you go heel deep into the mud, barely doable in a 4WD i.e a trac-k-tor way. Is there some other guiding rule at work here?

ciao
Dhanapot (2022-08-05 12:41:31+00:00): Hi SekeRob, Thank you for your feedback, I have changed back the northern portion from this node 5985597571 as track and removed the track type from remaining unclassified highway which provide access to the settlement.
eggie (2022-08-04 11:01:24+00:00): I doubt...
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:36:17+00:00): My intent was to create consistent classification between all the elements–track as a navigable element is surrounded by non-navigable elements. Do you think this is correct edit?
literan (2022-08-03 17:43:45+00:00): это не достопримечательность
hassani_danube_spa (2022-08-03 11:20:19+00:00): سالن ماساژ دانوب اسپا با کادری مجرب، تجربه چندین ساله و خدمات حرفه ای توانسته به بهترین سالن ماساژ و سالن فشیال کرج شناخته شود.
user_16800553 (2022-08-10 22:20:11+00:00): Laong laan
eggie (2022-08-04 11:51:05+00:00): Reverted by changeset #124477270

Ther must be a bug in the maproulette. I informed Totom to day.
This is certainly no cycleway.
Not every road that starts rom a cycleway is a path or cycleway. It's a serviceroad or driveway or a foresters- or farmers track. Please be careful with this way of changing roads.
Have a nice day
eggie
SNL_photo (2022-08-05 12:46:06+00:00): My apologies for the mistake. I will review all the resources before I edit again.
eggie (2022-08-05 13:08:01+00:00): Jolly good!
AndreyGeograf (2022-08-03 11:35:10+00:00): Случайно поставил галочку "Прошу кого-нибудь проверить мои изменения".

Accidentally checked the 'I'm asking someone to review my changes' checkbox.
StefanHRT (2022-08-03 12:00:42+00:00): Dankeschön ;)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:39:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Tilia_J (2022-08-03 13:17:32+00:00): Dear Melody.

There are several issues with your edit.

First, there was nothing wrong with the highway tagging itself. By changing service into path you imply that the whole parking lot is inaccessible by car.

Next, the service=parking_aisle has been left in place, while this tag requires the parent to be highway=service.

From the context perspective a parking aisle ONLY reachable by highway=track appears a bit strange but doesn't prevent routing.

You could better change the parking aisle to track OR change the track that connects the "Vierhouterweg" with the parking aisle to highway=service (without child tag)

The former has my preference bacause a track being a continuation of a service road is unlogical.
Tilia_J (2022-08-03 13:19:21+00:00): (Or, you could just have ignored this situation like I did a while ago)
melody_Tej (2022-08-05 13:06:15+00:00): My apologies. I will review the resources and will not make the same mistake again.
user_2066394 (2022-08-04 14:01:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3050129
Neubau gibt es doch nicht?
GerdP (2022-08-03 11:42:32+00:00): Oops, wollte eigentlich mit dem Kommentar nur die Masten hochladen. Außerdem diverse Gebäude, landuse, Baumreihen ergänzt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:45:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
kartler175 (2022-08-04 08:07:24+00:00): Bitte Fehler beheben:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.54598&lat=52.37302&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cring_not_closed%2Cways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2411892#map=13/52.3644/13.4958
Berlin53 (2022-08-04 09:48:22+00:00): Wie du vielleicht bemerkt hast, bin ich dabei auch einige uralte Fehler zu beheben. Aber alles braucht seine Zeit.
kartler175 (2022-08-04 12:44:29+00:00): Was ich bemerkt habe ist, dass Du bei der Behebung alter Fehler neue produziert hast.
Berlin53 (2022-08-04 13:45:59+00:00): Da waren zu viele doppelte Linien drin. Habe dann einiges erstmal gelöscht, bin aber nicht mehr dazu gekommen das Polygon neu zusammenzustellen. Ist jetzt erledigt. Was soll man bei der Hitze sonst tun!
aceman444 (2023-06-14 08:37:14+00:00): Trochu zmysluplnejsie popisy sad zmien poprosim:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
Warin61 (2022-08-04 00:22:54+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

The multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments... so all of the ones created here are wrong...
I would simply delete the relations and then tag the remaining ways as building=yes.
CrazyKim117 (2022-08-04 09:10:23+00:00): Thanks Warin6.
That's is the one that I did not know. I deleted the multipolygon buildings  and creates a new house.
jpennycook (2022-08-03 20:09:36+00:00): Hi!

According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3words#what3words_codes_in_OSM we can't add what3words locations to OpenStreetMap.

Jon
RebeccaKinge (2022-08-04 13:05:08+00:00): Hi. Thanks for letting me know, I will delete them. Rebecca
Jillis inactivE (2022-08-03 12:49:28+00:00): Bitte, don't use OpenStreetMap notes as your personal to-do list, even if it's well meant, danke.
h_i_ (2025-03-02 20:15:02+00:00): Hallo Falk78,
ich bin gerade durch Zufall auf das Gebäude Gostritzer Str. 63 gestoßen. Kannst du dich erinnern, wieso du das als Multipolygon erstellt hast? Es ist doch eine zusammenhängede Fläche, die noch ein paar Gebäudeteile enthält. Mit dem Multipolygon scheint mir alles etwas zu kompliziert umgesetzt.
h_i_
Falk78 (2025-03-05 07:51:41+00:00): Hallo h_i_,
Ziel war es die 3D Darstellung des gesamten Gebäudes zu realisieren. Als Renderer nutze ich https://demo.f4map.com/

Kann man das Gebäude dennoch einfacher erstellen um auch eine 3D-Ansicht zu generieren?
Falk
h_i_ (2025-03-06 12:08:30+00:00): Okay das habe ich verstanden. Dafür brauchst du zumindest für das Gebäude mit Hausnummer 63 aber keine Multipolygone, ich habe das etwas vereinfacht und die einzelnen Liniensegmente zu einer Fläche zusammengeführt, die Aufbauten/das weitere Stockwerk waren auch schon als Flächen mit building:parts=yes gekennzeichnet. Es reicht dann auch aus das die Gebäudeteile innerhalb des Grundrisses liegen.
Der Umriss bestand voher aus drei einzelnen Linien, die indirekt (über eine Relation) zu einer Fläche kombiniert wurden, da die Linien selbst keine besonderen Eigenschaften haben, habe ich sie einfach zusammengeführt. So sollte es einfacher sein mit dem gleichen Informationsgehalt.
Falk78 (2025-03-16 16:03:29+00:00): Wenn ich mir jetzt die 3D Darstellung ansehe ist leider das Gebäude total kaputt... Deine Änderung war jetzt suboptimal. Kannst Du das wieder reparieren?
h_i_ (2025-03-16 16:25:24+00:00): Hmm, also total kapput ist wohl Interpretationssache. Ein paar Aspekte waren wohl so eingetragen, dass die Interpretation doppeldeutig war. Außerdem waren zwei Linien doppelt. Mal schauen, ob jetzt schöner ist.
syntex (2022-08-13 15:30:48+00:00): Co to jest?
Piotr Strębski (2022-08-14 19:40:36+00:00): Jest to miejsce wyznaczone, w miejsce dawnego oddziału celnego 😊 nie pytaj mnie kto wymyślił te nomenklaturę "miejsce wyznaczone", ale tak to oficjalnie się obecnie nazywa w strukturze urzędu celno-skarbowego.
Piotr Strębski (2022-08-14 19:43:32+00:00): https://www.mhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.mazowieckie.kas.gov.pl/c/document_library/get_file%3Fuuid%3D1b159378-2696-4ae0-834d-9a62ba281efc%26groupId%3D3554560&ved=2ahUKEwiKu_OMi8f5AhXWuaQKHUASC_IQFnoECAkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0g3jeB1QkT7Wfx9pjQxw1z
Piotr Strębski (2022-08-14 19:43:58+00:00): https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.mazowieckie.kas.gov.pl/c/document_library/get_file%3Fuuid%3D1b159378-2696-4ae0-834d-9a62ba281efc%26groupId%3D3554560&ved=2ahUKEwiKu_OMi8f5AhXWuaQKHUASC_IQFnoECAkQAQ&usg=AOvVaw0g3jeB1QkT7Wfx9pjQxw1z
Piotr Strębski (2022-08-14 19:45:12+00:00): INFORMACJA
Dyrektora Izby Administracji Skarbowej w Warszawie
z dnia 24 czerwca 2021 r.
w sprawie wyznaczenia miejsca do przedstawienia towarów organom celnym, 
zlokalizowanego w Warszawie przy Al. Krakowskiej 106

3. Miejscu wyznaczonemu nadaję oznaczenie: "Miejsce Wyznaczone w Warszawie przy 
Al. Krakowskiej 106" oraz przydzielam numer identyfikacyjny PL440000MW0004.
syntex (2022-08-14 21:51:00+00:00): To może trochę rozwiń tą nazwę? Bez tego, jest kompletnie nie zrozumiała
NieWnen (2022-08-14 23:17:21+00:00): @Piotr Strębski
Proponuję wrzucenie tego do official_name + najlepiej dać też source:name, który podrzuciłeś, a w name jednak coś bardziej prostego/jasnego :P
Piotr Strębski (2022-08-18 09:05:52+00:00): @syntex - jest zrozumiała dla korzystających ;-) ci, co mają się odprawić celnie wiedzą co to Miejsca Wyznaczone i Miejsca Uznane :-) Ale spoko, dla "szeregowego konsumenta" skróciłem nazwę tylko do MW.
@NieWnem - zrobione, dzięki za sugestie, zgadzam się z nimi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125051121
syntex (2022-08-18 10:30:18+00:00): Według mnie, to jeszcze gorsze jest to skrócenie xD Powinno być tak: Miejsce wyznaczone do przedstawienia towarów organom celnym
rohieb (2022-08-07 23:36:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301183769/history Ich verstehe noch nicht, warum da ein building=yes durch ein area=yes ersetzt wurde…?
Außerdem sind im aktuellen Datenstand noch überlappende buildings, seitdem es die Outline https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083499791 gibt. Möglicherweise sollen das "building:part"s werden?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124433811
Weltmaennchen (2022-08-08 12:23:39+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Vorher war "Museum" Icon gar nicht mit einem Gebäude verbunden, sondern stand einfach im Lichthof des Museums. "Area" hatte ich gewählt, weil ich mir nicht sicher war, wie der überdachte Innenhof als Teil des Ensembles zu klassifizieren ist. - Wenn "Building" trotzdem korrekt ist, änderdere ich das auch gerne.

Den Outline-Konflikt hatte ich gesehen, wollte aber als unerfahrener Mapper nicht in die Geometrie existierender Gebäudeteile und Straßen eingreifen. Da du dich da besser auskennst: Würdest du empfehlen, die Überlappung einfach anzupassen, oder gibt es bestimmte Tools, die man dafür nutzen sollte?

Schöne Grüße

Weltmaennchen
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124433811
Weltmaennchen (2022-08-08 12:28:46+00:00): Addendum: Habe eben nochmal in den Änderungssatz geschaut, und gesehen, auf welchen Gebäudeteil sich die "Area" Änderung bezieht - das war wohl tatsächlich nicht beabsichtigt. Würde das gerade wieder rückgängig machen. Danke
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124433811
Weltmaennchen (2022-08-08 13:05:17+00:00): Hier ist das Changeset, dass die Überlagerung mit der Fußgängerzone behebt und den Area Tag wieder rückgängig macht. https://osmcha.org/changesets/124638549

Ich hoffe, dass ist so korrekt?

Schönen Nachmittag

Weltmaennchen
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124433811
rohieb (2022-08-09 11:04:03+00:00): Ah danke, jetzt sieht es gut aus! Wegen building:parts muss ich mal schauen… das Museum wurde ja letztens umgebaut, aber ich gehe mal davon aus, dass es immer noch so aussieht wie auf dem aktuellen Luftbild bei Bing?
eggie (2022-08-04 10:52:10+00:00): reverted by changeset #124474470

It's a track for a farmer.
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:12:52+00:00): My apologies, I made a mistake. Thank You for reverting the changes and will review the resources so that I don’t make the same mistake again.
whb (2022-08-04 11:34:19+00:00): Entfernt, da Duplikat von:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1810652518
eggie (2022-08-04 10:50:05+00:00): Restored track and footway
This is a farmerstrack
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:09:12+00:00): My apologies, I made a mistake. Thank You for reverting the changes and will review the resources so that I don’t make the same mistake again.
eggie (2022-08-05 11:36:38+00:00): I think there is an exception for the farmer to use the cycleway to enter the farmland. 
You tool gives you false information.. (false positive. )
Infrastructure is complicated in the Netherlands  :)
Greetz,
eggie
Gan_toon (2022-08-09 14:41:43+00:00): Thanks, eggie. Editing in these quality check challenges has been paused globally while these false positives are being looked into.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2022-08-04 10:47:12+00:00): reverted by changeset #124474257
due to damage the map.
Gan_toon (2022-08-05 11:03:41+00:00): Thank you for the feedback and reverting this edit, but can I ask for feedback? To me, it is a map quality problem that non-navigable elements (cycleway and path) are disrupting the connection between a navigable highway (track) and a general road network. Is there any concern about assuring routing?
eggie (2022-08-05 11:13:07+00:00): Hi Gan toon.. This is what happened
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124434817

The track went through the water. 
Cause...   Shifting the map in editmodus.. while selecting a node from the hiking route. 
In fact this is a track... suited for 4wheel farmervehicles. Selecting and panning the map goes with the left mousebutton. That is the problem with editor iD.
In the better editor JOSM shifting the map goes with the right button.
Greetz
eggie
Gan_toon (2022-08-09 14:40:20+00:00): Thanks for your feedback, eggie! I really appreciate it.
trigpoint (2022-08-03 12:34:57+00:00): Why have you changed this?

It is clearly made by two track vehicles and it for tractors to travel between fields.

Cheers Phil
Dora_game (2022-08-05 12:42:51+00:00): Thank you for the edit; I am reviewing the resources and will not make the same mistake again.
DD1GJ (2022-08-04 22:18:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013160141/history

Der Parkplatz ist bereits als Fläche vorhanden. In solchen Fällen bitte kenen neuen Knoten anlegen, sondern den  bestehenden Eintrag ergänzen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-04-13 06:45:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5245691 - can you take look at this note?
Dawid2849 (2022-08-03 12:45:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124429757
eggie (2022-08-04 14:22:10+00:00): reverted by changeset #124483513
eggie (2022-08-04 14:24:54+00:00): Please stop mapping this way..  There is probably a bug in maproulette that will give you a wrong interpretation.
Greetz
eggie
melody_Tej (2022-08-05 13:03:22+00:00): My apologies for the mistake. I will review all the resources before I edit again.
eggie (2022-08-05 13:09:08+00:00): Jolly good!

Thanks for reply.
eggie
MxxCon (2022-08-05 02:42:31+00:00): Hello Michael.
Let's not start edit wars.
Based on my research I have not been able to find any documentation that Dorman Square actually exists. I found some old articles that wanted to establish it, but I haven't found anything that confirms it actually happened.
That small grass square's doesn't have a proper name of "Greenstreets"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124435748
Michael Alvarez (2022-08-05 13:24:06+00:00): Literally step foot in the area. There are signs designating them. In fact, you can probably find said signs for both aforementioned areas on Google maps.
MxxCon (2022-08-05 13:29:29+00:00): It is irrelevant what's on Google Maps since you can't use it to map in OSM due to incompatible licenses and copyright violation.
Michael Alvarez (2022-08-05 13:42:09+00:00): Sounds like you need to step foot outside and see the city issued signs for yourself then.
MxxCon (2022-08-05 13:55:02+00:00): I am plenty outside.
I will go there today. Where is that sign?
Michael Alvarez (2022-08-05 14:14:43+00:00): Dorman Square’s sign is on the street post by the Chase next to Ave M’s sign. Greenstreets’ sign is on the patch itself facing the subway.
MxxCon (2022-08-05 17:28:31+00:00): I see the street sign. However, it is not fit the whole area here. Such memorial street names are usually for 1 or two blocks. So I can see Ave M segment between E15 and Elm Ave or E16 getting that as alt_name= tag.
I also see parks sign, but that's not an actual proper name of that plot of grass. It's the name of NYC Park department program to greenify the city.
MxxCon (2022-08-05 17:30:28+00:00): I do also see a metal plaque on the wall on the north side of Ave M right under train overpass. So that kinda further confirms that it's between E15 and Elm Ave
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-08-03 12:55:35+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=26.205839%2C-80.107523%2C17.35
ChehrehBargi (2024-05-09 07:01:39+00:00): Hello
You have entered the information of 3 other tags in the Postal code tag. Fix it Thank you for your efforts to improve the map
Nastaran_Sabouri (2024-08-10 12:28:40+00:00): fixing tags
ChehrehBargi (2024-08-10 16:16:02+00:00): I thank you for your efforts and I will correct the remaining parts.
danieldegroot2 (2022-08-03 15:34:36+00:00): Hey kenguest,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9929532269

It seems like you have created an empty node. This shouldn't happen if you just add a waste basket.

Let me know if you meant to add something there.

If you didn't create this node intentionally, it may be worth reporting it as a bug;
https://github.com/MarcusWolschon/osmeditor4android/issues

(ie. "User is able to create empty node")

Regards,

Daniel

PS: Any pictures (Mapillary / KartaView) would be appreciated if you're able to take them.
RedAuburn (2022-08-03 13:29:42+00:00): Oops, I changed them to `ref:GB:decc`, not `reg:GB:decc`.
RedAuburn (2022-08-03 13:58:19+00:00): And also meant large, not lage. Apparently I can't spell...
adrianojbr (2022-08-03 18:17:14+00:00): Olá, Rafael!

Você falou com todos os proprietários de todas as cachoeiras que você removeu?

Tem registro desses contatos?

Abraço!
user_6110846 (2022-08-03 14:04:52+00:00): також обрізав landuse=residential під житлову забудову обрізав б ов нього включили промзони
bxl-forever (2022-08-03 15:01:24+00:00): Hello,

If a shop is vacant, please remove its name and contact details and tag it as a vacant shop.  That way, we can follow the history of an object across time.
Deleting a shop is a bad idea because we lose the history associated with it.

(I restored this one from backups.)
m3astwood (2022-08-03 15:13:25+00:00): Ah OK, thanks for letting me know. Will amend.
adrianojbr (2022-08-03 17:58:37+00:00): Olá, Jener!

Houve algum problema na hora de adicionar o portão, pois foi substituída a etiqueta da trilha pela do portão. Ou seja, toda a linha ficou como se fosse o portão, enquanto o recomendado é que o portão seja um ponto dessa linha que continuaria sendo o caminho (trilha, no caso).

Abraço.
Jener (2022-08-03 20:23:27+00:00): Boa tarde!
Caramba, hehehe! Ô portão estranho... Te agradeço pelo aviso, já corrigirei.
Um abraço!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-05 08:06:03+00:00): Please, read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Is your editor not providing a way to describe edits?
Or not making clear that it is needed?
bhietsch (2022-08-06 17:25:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you intend to delete an entire National Forest off of the map? I can only assume this was an error and will be reverting this changeset. Before making any more edits, might be best read:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
Tomas_J (2023-07-26 15:18:10+00:00): Ahoj, tu si do popisného čísla dal orientačné, opravil som.
literan (2022-08-03 17:34:36+00:00): это очень смешно ((
EdLoach (2022-08-16 14:33:10+00:00): I think you might want to remove highway=track and just leave the disused:highway track, as the current tagging suggests this is routable: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=51.83696%2C0.99420%3B51.83588%2C0.99354
pole_climber (2022-08-17 14:51:12+00:00): Removed highway=track - thanks. That explains why cycle.travel was still navigating this way - I was about to ask for help but you highlighted it first.