piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-02-03 13:17:51+00:00): "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
eggie (2017-02-03 13:40:46+00:00): Dat golfterrein is wel direct een moeilijk project om te mappen. Het zijn multipolygonen. Niet al het landuse=forest is opgenomen in de buitenmulti. De land_use hoort eigenlijk landuse=grass te zijn. 
Ook ligt er een golfterrein over een andere tag golfterrein. Leisure=golf_course ligt daar met naam als een deken overheen. Het zit pok al door de vele mappers vol met fouten. Wil je echt gaan mappen gebruik dan JOSM als editor.
Kom je er niet uit vraag dan hulp op het forum wat te doen.
MVG,
Eggie
Commodoortje (2017-02-04 20:19:11+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik de golfclub Kromme Rijn in kaart gebracht.
Het is niet noodzakelijk om een golfterrein in een relatie (Multipoligonen) te plaatsen. Ik heb dan ook de relatie verwijdert en juiste tagging ingebracht.
Hier kun je zien hoe een golfterrein goed in kaart kunt brengen.
Wel heeft Eggie volkomen gelijk dat dit een moeilijk project is om mee te beginnen.
Hier kun je zien hoe het golfterrein er op een afgeleide kaart met OSM data uit ziet (Umap)
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/visite-guidee-du-rendu-osm-fr_4#16/52.0664/5.2205
(Rendering kan even duren, kijk anders morgen even)
editorv (2017-02-05 13:41:26+00:00): Dank jullie wel voor jullie hulp ziet er zo goed en bedankt voor het in vullen van het grand cafe
Carnildo (2017-02-03 05:20:57+00:00): Thanks for your work in mapping the less-populated parts of Idaho.

OpenStreetMap measures elevations in meters, not feet, and lets end-user software decide what units to display it in.  By changing the numbers for Stevens Peak, you've made it appear to be the tallest mountains in Idaho.

(I've changed it back.)
daganzdaanda (2017-03-27 18:15:03+00:00): Hallo Relaxi,
erstmal willkommen bei OSM.
Sorry, deine erste Änderung war so nicht richtig. Du hast ein Stück Lech als ganzes mit Pfad und Furt bezeichnet. Wenn du einen Joggerpfad kennst, der noch fehlt, dann zeichne eine neue Linie ein. Bei Fragen meld dich hier oder im Forum.
Carnildo (2017-02-03 05:06:43+00:00): For future reference, the correct tag for a parking lot or parking garage is "car parking" (amenity=parking).  "Parking space" is for if you're mapping the individual spaces within a parking lot.
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:06:42+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
highflyer74 (2017-02-03 19:31:44+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

Also, please try to be precise when mapping, don't forget to connect the ways you draw and: only draw ways which actually exist. OSM is no Pokemon playground but a serious geographic database.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask!

All the best,

highflyer74
mattchn (2017-02-04 22:46:17+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45817130
mattchn (2017-02-04 22:46:08+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45817130
mattchn (2017-02-04 22:45:59+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please only add objects to the map that actually exist. I have reverted your changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45817130
MCDA (2017-02-03 00:41:19+00:00): It is highly unlikely there are ATM's in these location.  Please revert this changeset.
chillly (2017-02-03 08:24:08+00:00): reverted
eggie (2017-02-03 08:11:31+00:00): "Welkom op OSM”

Je eerste edits zijn niet helemaal goed gegaan. Het voetpad over het veldje heb ik verbonden met het fietspad. het zat geplakt aan het veld zelf. Het parallel voetpad langs de Wildenborch heb ik weggehaald. Voetpaden langs wegen worden niet getekend behalve als er bv groen tussen zit. Bovendien zat het voor een deel geplaakt aan de weg zelf. Alle begin is moeilijk.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
Mapeiro (2017-02-03 21:05:30+00:00): Olá marlonwh,

Para estradas rurais de terra como essas que você mapeou normalmente se usa o tipo "minor/unclassified road" (highway=unclassified) e não "unmaintained track road" (highway=track) como você fez.

highway=track é para caminhos de terra bem rústicos/ruins mesmo, onde geralmente só passa trator e veículos 4x4.

Para essas estradas de terra rurais também é sempre útil especificar no tipo de surperfície que elas não são pavimentadas (unpaved), o que possibilita que programas de navegação possam evitar traçar rotas por estradas de terra quando configurados para tal.
uvi (2017-02-16 15:38:32+00:00): Handelt es sich hierbei http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2516096408 um einen richigen Milchautomaten oder eher um eine Verkaufsstelle?
Kommen Waren aus dem Regal, ist m.E. shop=farm mit der description, welche Sachen es dort gibt, korrekt. Sobald ein Automat steht, sollte der doch so auch erscheinen und recherchierbar sein. Da sind dort dann eventuell zwei nodes nicht falsch, zum Beispiel das Häuschen als shop=farm (mit allen Daten) und im Häuschen der Automat mit seinen Daten. Ich denke, es empfiehlt sich folgendes Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4095446266

Gruß Uwe
Mapeiro (2017-02-03 21:13:26+00:00): Olá,

Esse changeset está muito estranho. Gerou a duplicação de algumas estradas (a que você incluiu ao lado da versão já existente). Inclusive uma rodovia (que não é uma estrada rural, como consta no seu comentário).

Acho que algo muito errado aconteceu com o editor ou algo assim...
marlonwh (2017-02-03 23:19:12+00:00): Realmente ontem tive problema em uma das alterações. Quando salvei, foi muito demorado.  Vou verificar melhor.
cadsauxk (2017-02-04 12:38:13+00:00): 5 mil pontos novos via potlatch? Talvez fosse melhor reverter essa edição?
santamariense (2017-02-04 17:49:05+00:00): Concordo com o Gerald. Creio que seja mais fácil refazer, do que apagar manualmente os objetos duplicados.
cadsauxk (2017-02-04 18:11:00+00:00): Dá para fazer uma reversão parcial. Eu só não posso me oferecer para fazer pois estou saindo de viagem.
Mapeiro (2017-02-04 18:25:26+00:00): O marlonwh removeu possivelmente todos os trechos duplicados numa sequência de changesets.
Obrigado!
adrianojbr (2017-02-05 00:32:14+00:00): ainda havia sobrado alguma coisa em braço do norte. estou corrigindo.
Warin61 (2017-02-03 21:31:37+00:00): Park way 471661432 has a name, Immarana Place Reserve - can be found on the LPI Base Map .. and  the LPI Base Map has better boundaries ... corrected. 

Please refer to the LPI Base Map for more detail as you add/change stuff.
aharvey (2017-02-06 23:42:57+00:00): I see you've added the footpath here as highway=pedestrian. Check out the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian which describes that tag as "Roads mainly / exclusively for pedestrians".

These look like the sidewalk which is tagged as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk as highway=footway + footway=sidewalk.

Did you want to fix these up?

Also for routing, when these footways cross a road you should continue the line across the road (ensuring a node is at the intersection and tagged as a crossing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing).

If you want to get advanced the section of the line crossing the road should be tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dcrossing
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:06:23+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
Warin61 (2017-02-03 21:58:11+00:00): Hi,
Some comments;

1) No name ... so the change set description is wrong.. Possibly 'Add building" ? 
2) Building is not 'square' as in the corners are not square... in ID select the object (the building) and press the 'S' key .. see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts#Modifying_objects
3) you can get the address of the building from the LPI Base Map for even more detail. 

Hope that helps.
aharvey (2017-02-06 23:36:05+00:00): PS. If you're adding multiple buildings at the same time you can add them all then hit Save at the end so you only have one changeset adding a whole block of buildings.
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:05:59+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
Supaplex (2017-03-02 17:04:27+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 19:47:50+00:00): não existe castelo aqui! removido
pitscheplatsch (2017-02-03 17:42:39+00:00): Hi AshlandOH, welcome to OSM. Please don't map any pokemon related data. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45765619
For more information see: https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tips-pokemon-go/
AshlandOH (2017-02-04 01:51:27+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch,
I'm sorry, but I'm not sure I understand what you are asking... the blog you mentioned suggests adding "pokemon" in the comments, but it sounds like you are saying not to do that? 
Appreciate if you could clarify.
Thanks!
samely (2017-02-06 20:48:14+00:00): Hi, thank you for contributing to OSM, I replace your edit with a proper geometry.
GOwin (2017-03-15 02:03:33+00:00): Hello there. Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

"Covered Courts" are best tagged as 
building=roof

In this particular case, this object is more appropriately tagged like so:
building=roof
operator=DepEd
operator:type=government
nevw (2017-02-03 07:52:56+00:00): Welcome to the Openstreetmap.
I wish to help with this edit.
Do you mean that house numbers 3 to 5 occupy this section of Clarke Street.
If so, the correct name for the street is 'Clarke Street'. The street itself is not meant to hold the house numbers, so was correctly tagged before your edit.
To add the house numbers you need to add a node or better still a building outline for each house and add addr:housenumber=3 (for example) to the node or building outline.
For each house address you can also add addr:street=Clarke Street and addr:city=Lilydale. 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr

I hope this helps with your editing.
literan (2017-02-03 12:23:15+00:00): Здравствуйте! Пожалуйста, не дублируйте заправки.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 23:02:06+00:00): casita papas no existe.
Spanholz (2017-02-03 11:49:23+00:00): No water here, deleted. Sorry, please only tag real landmarks.
Spanholz (2017-02-03 11:43:41+00:00): Hi, 
openstreetmap.org is no playground, the data is used by many users and your changes are immediately visible for all of them. 
Your changesets have been reverted. 
Please refrain from doing such changes if future. Helpfull changes are always welcome! Thanks!
keithonearth (2017-02-03 19:30:42+00:00): Hi Purple Platapus, thanks for your edits, good to see new people mapping on OSM. You seem to have local knolage of these schools, and that's always a great addition to the map.

I did notice a few things that seem to be errors in Kerrisdale Park and Point Grey School. I've made an edit, cleaning up some errors, other things I am not sure about. I've remapped the soccer field w/in the track, as it should just be the field itself, not out of bound areas. I cleaned up the routing of the service road. 

You made a pretty significant modification to the park boundry, and it now overlaps with the school grounds. This is a mistake, as areas are either under the authority of the Parks Board or the School Board, but I do not know if you've made the park more accurate, and the school grounds need fixing, or the park should just be put back how it was.

One thing to avoid is to "map for the renderer" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer). That is to say to enter incorrect data to make the map look like we think it should. I noticed an oddly shaped sports field to the West of Point Grey school. I suspect that this is just a grassy area, that you wanted to show up green on the map. This would be a mistake, however conveniently we have the "landuse=grass" tag that will show up green on the map. Perhaps this area should be changed?

I'm wondering if your change to the park boundary is a similar thing, because the park shows up green on the map.

One more thing to point out before I shut up: iD (the editor you are using) has the ability to make map objects have 90 degree angles. This makes things like sports fields look *way* better. Click on an object, then in the pop up menu click on the button with the square icon.

Sorry for the wall of text, I hope some of that info is helpful. Thanks again for your edits, and happy mapping!
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:05:49+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
mueschel (2017-02-05 14:15:16+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node? Looks like something went wrong with copy and paste.

Cheers, Jan
_torsten_ (2019-06-10 18:45:50+00:00): Hallo thetornado76, du hast am 03.02.2017 die Bergstraße mit vehicle=no definiert. Das bedeutet, dass da das Verkehrszeichen 250 StVO "Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art" steht. Ist da wirklich so? Da dürfen dann auch die Anwohner und Gäste der Pensionen nicht hineinfahren. Oder gibt´s da ein Zusatzschild? Wäre schön, wenn du das ergänzen kannst.
Herzliche Grüße, Torsten.
thetornado76 (2019-06-10 19:49:20+00:00): Hallo Torsten,
Merkwürdig
Schau mal bitte auf https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.3007695&lng=8.609790100000055&z=17&pKey=fVdOpTfr8k3_UN8qv9yhZA&focus=photo dort ist das 250 zu erkennen. Ein Zusatzschild ist nicht zu erkennen. Von der anderen Seite https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.29676&lng=8.610702&z=17&pKey=q9MGuEvmJw9NXyy9Ep_YRw&focus=photo steht ein Zusatzschild Anlieferer frei.
Sollte ergänzt werden. 
Gruß Daniel
_torsten_ (2019-06-11 05:37:57+00:00): Hallo Daniel, danke für die beiden Links. Wenn ich die beiden Verkehrszeichen richtig deute, ist das wie eine "Einbahnstraße" für Anlieger. :-) Ich werde das mal ergänzen.
Herzliche Grüße, Torsten.
siripurapu (2019-03-21 05:24:50+00:00): "Hi PeZa,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way 266284616 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'.Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance."
dval (2019-09-19 15:56:56+00:00): Не стоит рисовать лес по линии дороги. Потом приходится отдирать одно от другого. Поскольку всё-таки лес на дорожном полотне не растет.
Spanholz (2017-02-03 09:57:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

I deleted your footway and added a better version according to OSM standards. Maybe have a look how to map footways in the wiki.
darlin579 (2017-02-03 10:07:05+00:00): I appreciate it and definitely will.
Alexander-II (2017-02-03 08:29:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы зачем-то обрисовали контуры зданий и проставили им только адрес. Эти здания уже отрисованы и адреса на них указаны. Так же вы испортили наименование у заведения. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=45768401 Правку откатываю.
BCNorwich (2017-02-14 14:27:35+00:00): Inadvertent un-tagged mapping removed. Added back wood area to your park, the area can have two or more descriptive tags.
Spanholz (2017-02-03 08:04:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

please connect the footways with streets and paths only then routing will be possible. Else they will be little islands.

Have fun mapping, Spanholz
manoharuss (2017-02-03 10:28:31+00:00): Hi LaserManiac,


Welcome to Openstreetmap. Your contributions to OSM are appreciated. It has been great to see new users show interest in OSM and map their neighborhoods. But I have found few issues I would like to raise. This is not a park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225823488/history as observed from Satellite imagery. I corrected this as this is a big feature easily visible on the map. This does not seem like a bridleway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468970368/history. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbridleway. This is too small for a forest https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471694428. Try natural=wood. This looks like a footway and not residential https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365600569/history. There are other minor issues. It would be great if you can correct these issues. Let me know what you think.

Best,

Manohar
chillly (2017-02-03 08:24:18+00:00): reverted
Alexander-II (2017-02-03 10:01:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не верится, что у подъезда многоквартирного жилого дома могли воздвигнуть памятник огромный размеров. Не создавайте объектов, которых не существует. Правку откатываю.
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52897463 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45707709].
siripurapu (2019-03-21 04:21:09+00:00): "Hi PeZa,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way 266284616 classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'.Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance."
chillly (2017-02-03 08:24:30+00:00): reverted
Glassman (2017-02-03 16:43:51+00:00): In OSM use spell out street name. Software can easily abbreviate a name but it is difficult to unabbreviate. I will correct these. And Welcome to OSM.
mattchn (2017-02-04 22:49:40+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Please only add things to the map that actually exist. I have reverted your changes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45817208
mavl (2017-10-13 16:52:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52897463 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45707709].
roschitom (2017-03-16 20:56:27+00:00): Hallo,
was ist Die Quelle für die Adressen 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4658667283 und  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4658667284
Vor Ort stehen da nur Fahrzeuge auf einen unbefestigten Parkplatz. 
So was gehört nicht in die Datenbank.
Kiekin (2017-03-17 07:23:31+00:00): Die Quelle stammt hierher:http://regio-osm.de/hausnummerauswertung/auswertung_auswahldetails?land=Bundesrepublik%20Deutschland&stadt=Oschatz
und die vom Land Sachsen bereitgestellten Hausnummernlisten im Bezug auf das Geoportal Sachsen.
richlv (2017-02-10 01:36:03+00:00): is that really a hostel, and is its name "Martas 9" ?
roschitom (2017-03-16 20:51:19+00:00): Hallo,
was ist die Quelle für diese  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4658675266   Adresse.
Vor Ort ist dort nur Wiese und kein Hinweis auf etwas vorhanden.
mavl (2017-10-12 16:03:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
jaap de vries (2017-05-31 07:26:26+00:00): Ik kijk met verbazing naar je bijwerking mbt oude begraafplaats. Waarom heb je die dwars door gebouw huisnr 6 heen gelegd?
Is de gemeentelijke informatie zo dat dit echt zo hoort?
Hier staat het goed, http://www.ruimtelijkeplannen.nl/web-roo/roo/bestemmingsplannen?tabFilter=ACTUEEL 
Nogmaals let goed op anders zijn we echt genoodzaakt om je een (tijdelijke) blok door de DWG aan je te geven.
Supaplex (2017-03-02 17:05:10+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2017-02-03 09:55:09+00:00): 不好意思，請不要把地名改成建案名稱，建案名稱請另外圈出住宅區範圍加上名字
mavl (2017-10-12 16:04:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52861764 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45770079].
chillly (2017-02-03 08:24:46+00:00): reverted
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-12-27 10:47:46+00:00): [Makati] tag floors of Landmark
mueschel (2017-02-05 12:57:11+00:00): Hi,
the tagging of this node doesn't seem right.
It is now a sports center, a group home, a foundation and a locality in the same place.
Could you correct this?
Jan
surveyor54 (2017-02-03 19:28:20+00:00): Hallo Vankhon,
willkommen bei OSM. Schön, dass du hier mitmachst.
Eine Frage, steht das Gebäude noch?
Gruß
surveyor54
Vankhon (2017-02-06 07:51:12+00:00): Das alte Gebäude steht noch. Da wo nun der neue Standort ist, wurde die hier zu sehende Halle abgerissen und eine komplett neue gebaut.