piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Commodoortje (2016-01-17 11:21:22+00:00): Welkom op OSM, je eerste stap is gezet.
Inmiddels heb je vermoedelijk een welkomstmail ontvangen.

Ik ga je even helpen:
De aangebrachte node met onderstaande tags
addr:housenumber=158
addr:street=Tongelresestraat
name=Suus Bloem & Meer
shop=flowers

Heb ik samengevoegd met de reeds bestaande adresnode van nr 158.
De tag shop=flowers heb ik aangepast naar shop=florist
Je kunt hier terugvinden waarom ik dit gedaan heb.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

Tevens heb ik de webpagina van de winkel en de openingstijden aangebracht.

Groeten,
Commodoortje
R0bst3r (2016-01-18 16:31:59+00:00): Changed maxspeed:reverse to maxspeed:backwards.
naoliv (2016-01-22 20:14:13+00:00): Aurélio, procure utilizar um caminho para cada rua apenas.
Em alguns locais você usou um caminho para representar várias ruas.
AURELIO DANILO (2016-01-24 00:31:54+00:00): Ué Estranho ? não me lembro de ter feito isso !? Vou verificar e olhar i
naoliv (2016-01-24 00:35:47+00:00): Eu acabei corrigindo as ruas nesse local. Mas estavam assim, por exemplo: http://i.imgur.com/ppzGQVS.png
Ao invés de usar um caminho para cada rua, você usou um caminho para desenhar várias ruas. Não sei se dá pra entender melhor com essa imagem.
E outra coisa que faltou é conexão entre as ruas. As ruas que você desenhou apenas "passavam" uma por cima das outras, sem um nó de conexão entre elas.
Outras também terminam bem próximas de outras ruas, também faltando conexão.
AURELIO DANILO (2016-01-24 22:36:17+00:00): Obrigado pelo comentário<  eu entendi vou melhorar ok . não vai mais se repetir . qualquer outro erro pode comentar novamente, abraços
AURELIO DANILO (2016-01-24 22:42:47+00:00): Ah já que esta olhando esta área, eu tentei fazer algumas conexões entre luminárias e carrancas< região turística de cachoeiras e muitos passeios em áreas rurais, mas não consegui terminar, pelo BING, não da pra ver as estradas na totalidade. se quiser ajudar nesta região seria bom ok, tem varias conexões também com a estrada real.
GerdP (2016-01-18 09:52:05+00:00): Hi there!
Please explain: What is meant by
highway=theoretical ?
Zhent (2016-01-27 07:29:56+00:00): I think there was supposed to be a connecting track about there according to published maps, however I didn't notice it whilst passing by. I was going to go back to confirm if a track/path does exist but haven't done so yet.
GerdP (2016-01-27 08:14:54+00:00): hmm, so I suggest to remove the way, as we don't copy from other maps. Add it after your visit if it really exists. OK?
Zhent (2016-01-28 07:18:05+00:00): Fine.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:13:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:13:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
muralito (2016-01-31 22:28:49+00:00): Hola Guille.

Estas haciendo un laburo impresionante, aunque hay algunos detalles para enfocar mejor.

Por ejemplo, las parcelas no son building=algo, el building=algo es solo en la edificacion propiamente dicha no en todo el predio. El porque de eso lo podes ver en cualquiera de los mapas que representan OSM en 3D y vas a ver que las manzanas que dibujaste quedan como una meseta, sin los huecos.

Las direcciones una posibilidad es la que estas haciendo, pero lo que en general se usa es que la direccion este en un punto sobre la linea de la parcela que da a la calle, ya sea el punto medio, el punto de la puerta propiamente dicha, etc.

Si pones la direccion en todo el predio, y alguien busca por direccion le queda ambiguo a donde dirigirse ( es muy probable que le quede ambiguo).

Saludos,
M.
Kagami (2016-01-22 11:57:35+00:00): Humm..Change to use coastline as boundary , because I don't know detail about Taiping Island.
Geofreund1 (2019-05-01 08:21:22+00:00): Hallo fx99,
du hast in der "Untere Straße" in Schafhausen die HN 9 offenbar doppelt vergeben. Welches Gebäude soll denn die Nr. 9 tragen?
fx99 (2019-05-01 14:24:14+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Habe eine Nummer herausgenommen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:14:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
SammysHP (2016-02-22 16:48:32+00:00): Hallo, in diesem Changeset hast du viele Garagen oder andere kleine Gebäude gelöscht. Ich bitte dich, diese wiederherzustellen.
zstadler (2016-07-20 08:53:00+00:00): The tagging of this area is somewhat unclear. If this is the final shape of the building, then the tags need to be "building=construction" and the construction tag need to hold the future value of the building tag. For example "construction=commercial" or "construction=yes".
If this is not the shape of the building, then the "building=proposed" is inappropriate and should be deleted. By the way, the proposed tag is used before any work has started, and the construction tag is used before the opening.
zstadler (2016-08-16 07:50:23+00:00): Since there was no response, I will assume this is not the shape of the proposed building and correct the tags accordingly.
opendcc (2016-01-17 15:02:20+00:00): Hallo,

die Straße beim Kohlschmid durch ist doch Einbahnstraße oder? Und heißt das Schmiedgasse oder Schmidgasse?
dvdhoven (2016-01-17 14:54:11+00:00): Wat er precies misgaat weet ik niet, maar op wegId 391864972, de Meidijk, tussen Kweldijk en Waaldijk was de routerelatie met fkp route 06-19 verdwenen.
Het vreemde is, dat de Lf route, de Oeverlandroute er nog wel op lag.
Maarten Deen (2016-01-17 16:07:18+00:00): Dan heb ik idee wat er mis gegaan kan gaan: ik heb de relatie van bus 49 gedownload, daar bleek weg 32469578 te lang te zijn omdat de relatie bij weg 286180529 afslaat, dus op node 43904467 heb ik weg 32469578 gesplitst. Als JOSM dan die fietsrelatie niet gedownload heeft dan wordt de nieuwe weg (391864972) ook niet in de relatie opgenomen.
Dat lijken me "fouten" die regelmatig gemaakt worden, ik zal er aan denken dat ik de omgeving download als ik voortaan een weg splits.
dvdhoven (2016-01-17 18:46:18+00:00): Mijn excuses voor mijn reacties van gisteren. Dat was niet zoals het moet.

Dit gaat wat constructiever denk ik. In ieder geval voor mij een leermoment. Ik gebruik de plugin continuous download en was me niet bewust dat het ook anders kan.
Andreeeee (2016-11-21 17:34:01+00:00): "Polom 2013" asi nebude oficialny nazov tej lokality? skor to znie ako nejaky pracovny nazov (pouzivany napr. lesnikmi)?
Hjart (2016-01-17 09:50:59+00:00): De copy/paste-venlige er de sjoveste :-D
Robert Whittaker (2016-02-04 10:54:03+00:00): In http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391869459 you've put ref:edubase="Southfield School", which can't be right. But is the "Southfield School" bit significant for this school or just a random copy and paste error?
Mark_S (2016-02-11 19:48:32+00:00): Good spot.  This was entirely a copy and paste error. I've just updated ref:edubase record for the school. Thanks for the update
freeExec (2016-01-18 11:09:00+00:00): Светофоры ставятся на пересечении дорог, а не на стоплинии
trigpoint (2016-01-17 13:43:29+00:00): Hi
I think something has gone wrong here. You have deleted http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388641349/history, this was a valid way and in so doing have lost detail that had been added by another mapper.
I assume this is some kind of automated edit, and the fact that the two ways share common nodes is the reason for the failure.
I have never seen your name in @talk-gb, so I assume you are not following http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct.
These changes should be reverted and you should improve your methods before proposing them to the local community.
Thanks Phil
trigpoint (2016-01-17 14:08:34+00:00): My apologies, that was a duplicate way. Sorry I should have looked harder when reviewing the change.
Thanks Phil
Supaplex (2016-02-07 12:28:59+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:13:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
edward17 (2016-01-17 12:22:24+00:00): Привет! Спасибо за добавление названий улиц.

Но, по правилам OpenStreetMap, названия улиц указываются вместе со статусной частью. Например, должно быть "Южная улица", а не "Южная".

Подробнее об этом можно прочитать здесь: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Назви#.D0.9F.D1.80.D0.B0.D0.B2.D0.B8.D0.BB.D0.B0
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:14:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
GerdP (2016-01-18 10:18:43+00:00): Hi there!
Please check this typo:
highway=t on node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3951444857
What was meant ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:14:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
Menno Tammens (2016-05-22 15:20:52+00:00): Beste Ad,

Je hebt in deze changeset o.a. 3 navigation lines toegevoegd, maar daarbij niet aangegeven over welk deel van de lijn dit ook de recommended track is (zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks/Leading_Lines).

Ik heb de leading lines nu gesplitst in navigation line en recommended track. Zie deze changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39487624
De lijn tussen NoordKetel en Oostketel heb ik ook een heel stuk ingekort, want die liep nog een heel stuk door naast de geul.

http://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=14&lat=51.39543&lon=4.20255

Groet,
Menno
derredu (2016-01-17 17:49:56+00:00): Hallo cesario, abgesehen vom falschen Änderungskommentar sind alle von dir eingetragen Infos schon vorhanden, nämlich am Gebäude und jetzt doppelt in OSM. Oder habe ich etwas übersehe?
Gruß derredu
Warin61 (2016-08-07 22:03:51+00:00): Hi,
Relation: Store Beach (2927697) is not closed. I think this may be left as a simple way - not a relation?
derredu (2016-01-18 13:02:48+00:00): Ich vermute, dass hier der Verkaufsladen leersteht und irgendwann was neues reinkommt. Wenn das so ist sollte man den node nicht löschen, sondern "shop=vacant" dranschreiben.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvacant
 Gruß Rene
mavl (2016-01-17 13:46:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение данных. Значение тега name не нужно заключать в кавычки.
Müszi (2016-01-31 19:06:34+00:00): Hi!

You deleted roads that were based on my own survey (and tagged accordingly), have uploaded GPS tracks and are also visible on the satellite imagery (for example, way 389350122).

Paths may not be visible on the satellite imagery (for example, ways 389395745 and 389394072), but they do exist.

Can you please explain why did you delete these ways?
Müszi (2016-01-31 19:13:25+00:00): Worse yet, way 317120445 has been part of a (very important) hiking route, that now has a gap in it. I really want to know why did you delete this one.
ViriatoLusitano (2016-01-17 15:49:38+00:00): Thanks!
alphensebezorger (2016-01-17 16:26:17+00:00): Frozz & Oodlz is hier toch gesloten?
Supaplex (2016-01-17 16:01:18+00:00): 您好：

已經有羅東鎮囉
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3480284
Supaplex (2016-02-07 12:29:34+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
malenki (2016-02-22 19:43:58+00:00): Mirëdita Denis,

your fix on Fierzë wasn't too useful.¹ 

You changed TYPE to type but overlooked that the node still missed a place=village. ;)

And regarding the TYPE tag: since it sat there all the time with a whole bunch of other uppercase tags used by an import it would have been better to leave it that way. A tag "type=City_Communa Capital" isn't documented so far for OSM. And if someone maybe looks in the future for TYPE=* in Albanie of this import he may miss the ones you changed – but will find the 1759 still existing :)

Best Regards and further happy mapping
Thomas

¹ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/728418340/history
DenisJu (2016-02-22 21:24:05+00:00): Guten Abend Thomas,
thank you for your review and for your work in mapping Albania.
I will check this issue next days!
Best Regards! :)
malenki (2016-02-22 21:36:51+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply. There is not really much to fix – in this changeset at  least. ;) It was just a hint.
(I fixed now the last twenty imported places which I obviously missed in 2011.)
malenki (2016-02-22 21:37:48+00:00): PS: I really love Albania and to map so it is real fun to map it.
dudka (2016-01-21 08:26:49+00:00): адреса цього будинку "Драгомирова "10/10"
https://goo.gl/maps/enCTpawY5Gt
molind (2016-01-21 12:20:54+00:00): Парикмахерские добавлены в поле. Причем получается что в этом квартале 3 парикмахерских с одинаковым именем. Если там построили дом, добавьте его пожалуйста. Чтобы было ясно где находятся эти объекты.
Hjart (2016-01-17 18:30:39+00:00): Er der tale om https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friderich_Adolph_Schleppegrell ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:14:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
Stereo (2016-01-17 16:17:13+00:00): Wars du rem moossen?
b108 (2016-02-17 09:56:49+00:00): Я никак не пойму: что это за дорога, из каких фантазий Вы её достаёте?

Это уже не в первый раз когда Вы добавляете в районе Самофаловки данные, не соответствующие действительности.

Через переезд сейчас невозможно проехать двигаясь по федеральной трассе. Исправляйте свои косяки или я сделаю полный откат Ваших правок.
b108 (2016-02-17 09:59:32+00:00): Также сообщаю, что СТРОЯЩИЕСЯ дороги должны быть обозначены как highway=conctruction (см. wiki). Исправляйте.
b108 (2016-03-02 08:43:17+00:00): Давайте начнём с того, что в реальности мосты сейчас НЕ ДЕЙСТВУЮТ и движения по ним нет. Между тем федеральная трасса вроде как на перекрыта (в реальности) и по ней как-то машины ездят. Это значит, что если карта, которую Вы усердно правили, действительно соответствует действительности, то должна быть возможность проложить по этой карте маршрут из Волгограда, например, до Краснодонского ПО ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЙ ТРАССЕ "Каспий". А теперь внимательно следим за руками. Вот я прокладываю маршрут мимо Самофаловки:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=48.94517%2C44.22937%3B48.97968%2C44.19736#map=17/48.95852/44.21758&layers=H

Вуа-ля! Оказывается, вы неверными тегами обозначили мост и навигатор считает что он действующий и проложил дорогу через строящийся мост! Это нормально?
Sandal man (2021-07-15 18:15:44+00:00): Hello, this isn't a special running track, so I will remove it and make a relation from the route.
That is the correct way to map a route in OSM.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Drunning

Regards Jan
Hjart (2016-01-17 17:51:51+00:00): Du er kommet til at rykke Solbjerg Have nr 2 100 meter her
Niels Beck (2016-01-17 22:56:55+00:00): Ups! Det var fordi jeg ville rydde op dobbeltangivelser for en kina gril!!!
Jeg var nu egentlig lidt usikker på om jeg fik flyttet på numrene. Godt du var vågen!
Tak
maraf24 (2016-01-23 10:38:52+00:00): Proszę:
1. numer telefonu podajewać zawsze z kierunkowym Polski, czyli +48
2. godziny otwarcia sklepów wpisywać w okeślonym, sztywnym formacie opisanym na http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:opening_hours
3. nie tworzyć duplikatów jak w przypadku Leclerca i stacji BP
4. nie usuwać informacji o budynku - stacja BP
5. nie stosować nazw opisowych, jak "przystanek tramwajowy", tylko nazwę własną (Jamontta)
6. nie oznaczać przystanków tramwajowych jako autobusowych
7. nie używać wyrazów pisanych tylko wielkimi literami w nazwach
8. w tagach używać tylko języka angielskiego: zamiast shop=zdrowa żywność np. shop=yes + organic=only
9. nie kasować punktów adresowych!
10. żłobki oznaczać identycznie jak przedszkola
11. nie stosować "obszaru usług", bo to są MOPy przy autostradach
12. konsultować się z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Main_Page, bo kilka oznaczeń sklepów jest nieprawidłowych
Commodoortje (2016-01-18 15:23:07+00:00): Gerrit,
Gekoppelde URL is niet juist.

[URL=https://imageshack.com/i/hl2XkmOzj][IMG]http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/633/2XkmOz.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
[URL=https://imageshack.com/i/hlcGFNAGj][IMG]http://imagizer.imageshack.us/v2/xq90/633/cGFNAG.jpg[/IMG][/URL]
Commodoortje (2016-01-18 15:25:05+00:00): Sorry, mijn link is niet juist.
malenki (2016-01-25 19:06:12+00:00): Beim Löschen und Neumalen des Burgfriedens hast du die Einbahnstraßenregelung entsorgt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113470119/history

Bitte korrigiere das!
malenki (2016-01-25 19:43:48+00:00): Die Straße "Am Knüppchen" hast du auch entsorgt, obwohl es sie offenbar gibt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/503875
Bitte bringe das ebenfalls in Ordnung!
Hjart (2016-01-17 17:32:57+00:00): It's recommended that existing objects are reused rather than replaced (considering those islands). This way history is maintained better.
Alecs01 (2016-01-17 18:57:35+00:00): Ciao Nico, area=yes come tagging non è un granchè, da solo non ha significato. Per gli edifici il tag appropriato è building=*, per la piazza highway=*. Ciao buon mapping!
nicokant (2016-01-17 22:48:52+00:00): diciamo che ci stavo lavorando xD grazie del consiglio, ora correggo!
MarkusHD (2016-01-17 23:13:50+00:00): Was zu diesen doppelten Objekten führt, weiß ich nicht, das Phänomen hatte ich aber auch schon einmal. Mit iD kann es aber auch vorkommen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35059659
maciek-szn (2016-01-17 19:59:16+00:00): Dlaczego Pazimowi nadałeś adres plac Rodła 8, skoro w obrębie tego samego budynku jest jeszcze punkt adresowy plac Rodła 9?

Dlaczego targowisku Manhattan usunąłeś tag amenity = marketplace?
GerdP (2016-01-18 10:23:03+00:00): Hi there!
Please review: 
Maxspeed traffic signs are mapped with
traffic_sign=maxspeed + maxspeed=*
You used highway=traffic_sign + maxspeed=*
which is rather unusual
TheDutchMan13 (2016-01-18 17:55:30+00:00): Will be fixed, simple mistake i've been making. Well correct this and any others i've made as i come upon them. Thanks for noticing.
TheDutchMan13 (2016-01-18 18:02:43+00:00): Running an overpass to find my other errors. Any others would be only in arizona.
GerdP (2016-01-18 18:11:59+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I just noticed that the number of nodes tagged highway=traffic_sign increased during the last days, so I thought I'd better contact you. I did not try to find out who changed the ~1000 older nodes.
TheDutchMan13 (2016-01-18 18:15:53+00:00): Yeah i was able to find 1006 nodes around the world with (highway=traffic_sign). Any chance we could run a bot on just the nodes to clean them up? Change them to (traffic_sign=maxspeed. Or does that need to be run by the community?
GerdP (2016-01-18 18:30:59+00:00): My experience is that mechanical edits are so "banned" that I stiopped thinking about them :-(
Besides that there are probably not only maxspeed signs, I think some are also tagged with traffic_sign=*.
TheDutchMan13 (2016-01-19 04:45:37+00:00): I'm fixing all the ones found in arizona right now by hand.
GerdP (2016-01-19 08:39:29+00:00): sounds good to me. I am not eager to change them as they are probably not evaluated by any routing software.
will_p (2016-01-22 19:35:54+00:00): Please don't merge duplicate nodes when they belong to ways with different layer or level tags. I've fixed some nodes you wrongly merged around Nottingham.
rreuvekamp (2016-01-17 20:13:11+00:00): Also; the old Vinkenborgh building has been removed completely. Because it is now an empty piece of ground. 
I forgot to include it in the change set message.
My source for making these changes are that I am attending the youth centre weekly.
CloCkWeRX (2016-01-18 10:39:02+00:00): What's the error osmose is coming up with? The wiki suggests that combination of tags (direction=clockwise, highway=mini_roundabout), and in Australia that's consistent with the traffic flow...
demetrio_m (2016-01-18 16:42:33+00:00): Osmose signals the tag as unrequired because, by law, in the country the roundabouts are clockwise. A similar rule is applied by Osmose to the tag junction=roundabout that does not need any tag oneway=yes because the junction classified rondabout have the oneway by default.
CloCkWeRX (2016-01-18 23:33:44+00:00): Ah hah! Thanks
j03lar50n (2016-01-18 17:19:05+00:00): Thanks, John!
j03lar50n (2016-01-18 17:20:58+00:00): Thanks (again), John!
freeExec (2016-01-18 12:18:46+00:00): Ни смещение, ни контуры не выдержаны. Такой копи-паст на фиг не упёрся, лучше бы сходил туда и адреса собрал.
Anto110 (2016-01-18 12:30:22+00:00): Ну во-первых не сходил, а сходили. Тыкать вы будете в своей компании. А во-вторых, глаза ломать с картой мапбокс нет желания, когда будет карта большего разрешения, тогда можно и контуры точнее обрисовать. А пока поставил так, как видно с видеорегистратора.
freeExec (2016-01-18 12:40:07+00:00): Ну так вот скажу Вам, по опыту, потом это сложно исправлять, гораздо удобней рисовать с нуля.
А во-вторых, выйдя туда собирать адреса, будешь стоять на против дома, а по карте между домов, куда шлёпать адрес непонятно.
Поэтому кроме красоты-заполненности это создаёт только неудобства.
Anto110 (2016-01-18 12:52:29+00:00): Ну так удалите, раз они вам хлопот добавляют. Я уже сказал, количество домов ставил по регистратору, а по карте МапБокс не понятно, куда именно их ставить (там и дом, и пристройки, и сарай, все в куче).
dgitto (2016-01-18 09:58:11+00:00): Attenzione. anche queste strisce erano già mappate e devono stare su un noto appartenente alla via. Credo che usi OsmAnd, non vedi tutto. Non è un buon editor.
MCalaOSM (2016-02-03 16:12:22+00:00): Gia infatti era una prova e ho sbagliato ke cretino ke sono. Ciao
dgitto (2016-01-18 09:52:32+00:00): Ma la telecamera sul cavalcavia a Milazzo c'era già:
    "camera:mount"="pole"
    "surveillance:type"="camera"
    "camera:type"="dome"
    "man_made"="surveillance"
    "surveillance:zone"="traffic"
    "height"="6"

Inoltre le strisce pedonali devono stare in un nodo appartente alla via, erano separate. Forse perché le hai messe con osmand.
Ho corretto già.
*Martin* (2016-01-18 08:20:30+00:00): fofola :)
Nakaner-repair (2016-01-17 22:19:47+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 36611651, 36616461, 36642589.
atpl_pilot (2016-01-18 20:09:44+00:00): 'Und auch hier liegst du falsch. Die Hausumringe und Adressen werden zum allgemeinen Download angeboten. Bitte mal die Lizenzbedingungen lesen.
atpl_pilot (2016-01-18 20:15:16+00:00): Nachzulesen unter https://geoportal.sachsen.de/cps/geosn.html 

http://www.opendata.sachsen.de/631.htm 

http://www.opendata.sachsen.de/open_data_support.html 

https://www.geolizenz.org/modules/geolizenz/docs/1.3.1/GeoLizenz_V1.3_Open_050615_V1.pdf

AN JEDEM EINZELNEN OBJEKT WAR DER QUELLVERMERK ANGEBRACHT GEWESEN!

Das werde ich reverten.
Nakaner (2016-01-18 20:21:37+00:00): Und du glaubst, dass man mich dann sperrt und dich nicht?!

Die OSM-Community legt Lizenzen so streng wie möglich aus. Nach diesem Interpretationsgrundsatz genügt eine Nennung am Objekt nicht (wir wären damit auch nicht zufrieden, was die Attributierung von OSM angeht).

Ich habe dich gerade auch der DWG gemeldet. :-)