piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2019-11-24 10:26:25+00:00): Thanks for that.  Just to confirm - if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497958415 is not yet complete it shouldn't have a railway=light_rail tag on it.
For completeness, I stumbled on this by looking at edits by a user who's been making "fantasy edits" in Indonesia - adding motorways where there are none for example.  That's why I'm checking.
user_5359 (2019-11-21 17:49:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node.
skquinn (2020-06-19 22:42:23+00:00): In the future, please do not map the same thing twice as both a node and a way. Also, ways tagged as building should conform to the building outline (and not the entire area of, say, a church).
wireguy (2019-11-21 12:33:14+00:00): Looks good for the most part.   If you use the 'Q' key, it will square the buildings.  I added nsi info to the store, added the fuel building/roof and a few other tweaks.  Nice work, keep up the mapping!  
If you want to get in touch with other mappers, please join our Slack community at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ . Friendly people there are happy to answer questions. Thanks again!
evod (2019-11-25 17:15:14+00:00): Servus, ich bin mir nicht ganz sicher ob es so gut ist die Rotenturmstraße als living_street zu mappen. Es gibt ja noch immer keinen kompletten Konsens dazu (siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65566).

Die Straße ist im Gegensatz zur Mariahilfer Straße ja noch eher Durchzugsstraße, da wäre evtl. highway=residential auch plausibel.

Ich würde überhaupt alle Straßen innerhalb des ersten (Tuchlauben, Wollzeile,...) auf residential runtersetzen.

Wie siehst du das?

Was wir jedenfalls noch ändern sollten: die gesamte Bezo gleich mappen.. ein Stückerl Fleischmarkt und Lichtensteg gehören auch noch dazu (siehe alles was maxspeed=20 und traffic_sign=AT:§53.9e gesetzt hat.

LG, Markus
Kevin Kofler (2019-11-25 17:31:12+00:00): Also solange das Wiki ausdrücklich Begegnungszonen als ein Beispiel für living_street auflistet, bin ich auch dafür, die so zu mappen.

Daß es keine unterschiedlichen Tags für Begegnungszone vs. Wohnstraße gibt, ist zwar ärgerlich, aber diese Unterscheidung gibt es halt außerhalb von Österreich kaum wo, und es läßt sich durch traffic_sign und source:maxspeed genauer spezifizieren.
evod (2019-11-27 18:25:26+00:00): Klingt eh vernünftig, es hat sich nur damals 2013 wie ich das vorgeschlagen habe einiger Widerstand geregt.

Ich habe noch die paar Fortsätze der Rotenturmstraßen-Bezo auch als living_street gemappt.

Und ich würd mich freuen, wenn du meinen Vorschlag im Forum anschauen und kommentieren würdest: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65566
PerplexingPenguins (2019-11-21 03:57:44+00:00): Some sections of this road are still marked one-way, is that correct?
PerplexingPenguins (2019-11-21 04:02:37+00:00): service= should correspond to more broad types of service roads, perhaps drive-through would be correct here? If the road is covered, the covered portion should be tagged with covered=yes
santamariense (2019-11-26 19:55:24+00:00): Hello mr_et,
"para" and "sobre" are prepositions, so they have to stay in lowercase.
Good mapping!
santamariense
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77350936
mr_et (2019-11-27 00:12:19+00:00): Hello santamariense,
Thank you for letting me know, I'll fix that, and make sure not to change that from now on.
mr_et.
Carlos Brys (2019-11-21 19:50:24+00:00): Cambié las etiquetas de informacion turistica 
por 
name=Manzana 71
place=city_block
viloan (2019-11-21 03:04:43+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
portalaventura (2020-01-08 14:40:17+00:00): AlwaysSunnyInMapadelphia, a camada IBGE Street Names é uma fonte com erros. Você deve desconfiar dela, especialmente numa região com os nomes de ruas já mapeados, como é o caso da região que seu changeset altera. 

Na dúvida entre uma fonte e o estado atual dos dados, consulte o histórico do objeto, consulte a comunidade local, procure na wiki da cidade as fontes utilizadas ou abra uma nota no mapa. Isso evita distribuir erros e retrabalho por parte da comunidade local.

Exemplos de erros:

Avenida Hélvio Basso não é um alt_name da Rua Sueli Gomes de Oliveira. Apesar de estar na camada do IBGE iss não faz sentido, essa avenida é um pouco mais a leste da rua.

BR-287 não é um ref da Rua Carlos Uhr. E isso nem está na camada do IBGE, qual seria a fonte dessa informação?
AlwaysSunnyInMapadelphia (2020-01-09 00:45:43+00:00): Thank you for pointing out the IBGE has inaccuracies. I do not affect local data because I know there can the occasional error in IBGE. I only add IBGE as alt names on streets that have a name from the local community. The addition of ref BR-287 to Carlos Uhr Street was an honest mistake and will not happen again.

Obrigado por apontar que o IBGE tem imprecisões. Não afeto os dados locais porque sei que pode haver um erro ocasional no IBGE. Eu apenas adiciono o IBGE como nomes alternativos nas ruas que têm um nome da comunidade local. A adição da ref. BR-287 à rua Carlos Uhr foi um erro honesto e não acontecerá novamente.
SomeoneElse (2019-11-21 22:29:59+00:00): Hello,

The changeset comment here is "Sally Beauty Supply should be shop/hairdresser_supply #maproulette".  However, that seems to bear to relation to the actual edits made to e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292126047/history .  
Could you explain what happened?
Best Regards,
Andy
user_115918 (2019-11-23 06:39:20+00:00): When working on this Sally Beauty Supply maproulette challenge I updated additional missing brand data for common US brands.
SomeoneElse (2019-11-23 08:25:46+00:00): What knowledge of the area did you have that suggested that the edits you made here are correct?
Looking back to changeset discussion comments earlier this year (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=115918 ) a number of people have pointed out issues with your approach previously.
viloan (2019-11-21 04:05:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ralley (2019-11-21 04:46:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit, just one thing, please don't put descriptions like "Freedom Camping" in the name field.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only.  Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77352979
ralley (2019-11-21 04:49:16+00:00): The toilet and campsite added both turned out to be duplicates (maps.me is frequently outdated) - I've merged them with the existing objects
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77352979
mueschel (2019-11-22 09:08:34+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag 'error:circular=15' to these objects. Was this a mistake?

Jan
mspyker_imports (2019-11-22 16:45:34+00:00): Hi Jan - thank you for noticing. It was intentional, er I was aware of it as a result of a conflation tool I was testing. I'm working to delete the tags now!
iWowik (2019-11-23 16:51:07+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, вы ставите номера домов, а их обычно не просто найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы их берете?
mavl (2019-11-21 16:21:31+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
Кадастровую карту нельзя было использовать в качестве источника данных в OpenStreetMap, так как не было разрешения правообладателя этой карты.  
  
Вы связались с правообладателем, чтобы получить разрешение на использование кадастровой карты в OpenStreetMap?
Natalya-s (2019-11-25 12:00:32+00:00): мой дальний родственник зарегистрировал свой дом наконец-то
mavl (2019-11-25 14:28:56+00:00): Простите, Natalya-s. Ваши родственники здесь ни при чём. Речь идёт о разрешении на использование публичной кадастровой карты в OpenStreetMap. Вы получили разрешение от правообладателя?
Arlas (2019-11-27 12:20:32+00:00): credo che Palazzo "Del Grado" sia un cognome quindi maiuscolo?
dgitto (2019-11-30 15:35:12+00:00): Immagino di sì. E comunque dovrei smettere di fare queste modifiche semi automatiche:-(
abakus_uploader (2019-11-21 23:31:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
takeos (2021-10-21 08:57:13+00:00): Hi, though you added cycleway=shared_lane to 四谷通（山手グリーンロード） I can't find any shared lane markings on the actual road. Could you tell me your intention with this tagging if it's not an error? Thanks.
user_5359 (2019-11-21 17:46:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
mbethke (2019-11-21 09:02:56+00:00): Careful: that there are no buildings on the image may also be because they are newer than the image! Bing imagery is quite old here, if you use the layer icon to switch to Maxar, you'll see them. I just added them back in as for some reason reverting didn't work.

cheers,
Matthias
Jake Carter (2020-02-04 14:22:02+00:00): Need to remove the service road "Jackson Way" from the map. It is our 100% private driveway leading to a house. It is not a road and we're not sure where the name came from, we are not the Jacksons.
Jake Carter (2020-02-04 14:28:49+00:00): We have also requested to remove it from Google Maps. It does not appear on the county's maps via ESRI.
phidauex (2020-02-04 16:02:26+00:00): Hi Jake, the road got that name because at some point in the past a US Census mapper was told by someone that the road was named that - those names hang around in the database for a long time (possibly decades).

I've removed the name, and changed the way to a private driveway so no routing will occur. I've left the line in place, however, since likely someone would just remap it later, and these private driveways are still used for emergency services and deliveries.
Jake Carter (2020-02-05 00:13:18+00:00): @phidauex, you are awesome! Thanks so much. This goes a long way to helping clear up a lot of confusion!
rzsi (2020-02-05 03:32:46+00:00): Hi,
@Jake - As we didn't have any information on the road name apart from the TIGER data available on OSM, I had to edit the road accordingly and assumed it to be a service road. 

@phidauex - thanks for fixing the issue.

 Looking forward to learning more from you. 

Regards,
rzsi.
gscholz (2019-11-30 10:02:59+00:00): Hi armnd,
your recent changeset have created a big amount of errors in the osm database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-80.45850&lat=-1.05740&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,unconnected_open_ends_1

Can you please fix this?

Guido
stevea (2019-11-21 18:54:27+00:00): So, you've broken the wood polygon for the Pogonip.  How are you going to fix that?
stevea (2019-11-21 19:04:39+00:00): I fixed it.

Look, if you are going to edit OSM around UCSC, that's fine, as long as you don't destroy existing valid data.  Please be careful, read wiki or ask (me, others, our forum, the talk pages...) if you don't understand something.
alwaysdrowzee (2019-11-22 00:00:02+00:00): Thanks for fixing it
stevea (2019-11-22 00:01:19+00:00): You are welcome.

Look sharp, map smart, be nice, learn much.

Map well!  (Ask, read wiki, be nice, stand tall...)
user_5359 (2019-11-21 17:43:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
opendcc (2019-11-21 09:26:28+00:00): Hallo,

ich würde Dich gerne bitten, Deine Änderungen mit einem (kurzen) Kommentar zu versehen, was Du gemacht hast.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Danke
Yorvik Prestigitator (2019-11-22 02:15:24+00:00): this barrier is only temporary, in place for only another 10 weeks
Locator (2019-11-24 07:45:37+00:00): OK, no probs. I’ll remove it, in case I forget. Thanks for the heads up.
vectro (2022-06-26 22:53:56+00:00): Hi, I noticed you updated the Trestles Beach Trail to be a cycleway instead of a track. Do you mind saying a few more words about this change? It sure looks like a path or track to me.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-25 09:52:07+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3490376 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-25 09:52:53+00:00): Also does "Table en bois" simply mean "wooden table" and is description rather than name?
Glib6 (2023-01-05 09:52:13+00:00): Obviously there is no shop round here haha, using "kiosk was a mistake"
Table en bois means wooden table and is not the name for shure.
I'll edit those.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-08 16:32:38+00:00): Thanks for responding and editing them!

I also edited to provide "bring your own grill" in more machine-readable form (this tags are very rarely used but in future can be supported by data consumers)

I hope that I interpreted the name correctly!
Kovoschiz (2019-11-21 10:46:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77369922 `closed=no` is not a valid tag
GPX Speedtag (2019-11-23 22:03:35+00:00): Binnen de bebouwde kom gebruiken we geen highway=unclassified ik zal het aanpassen.
chauaak (2019-11-21 10:56:02+00:00): Apologies for pasting a wrong link. 
I have added a service road along 'Governours Lane'.

Regards,
chauaak
blackboxlogic (2021-04-06 16:09:18+00:00): I'm curious about the no-left-turn relations you added. I don't see any signage (or otherwise) to support them.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10320654
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10320655
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10320653
YaStratospheric (2021-04-06 16:30:53+00:00): I added restrictions as Bing streetside and Mapillary shows road markings 2 solid lines. If I am not mistaken, then they can be crossed when turning left, moving along the road. If it is possible to cross them when leaving the courtyards and adjacent territories, let me know, please, I will definitely correct them?!
blackboxlogic (2021-04-06 18:55:56+00:00): Regarding "2 solid lines"
I think you mean the two solid yellow (orang-y) lines that run down the center-line of Main Street. Those are the default marking for streets in the US and server to separate traffic going in opposite directions along a road. They do not have any meaning for restricting turns onto or off of a road.
YaStratospheric (2021-04-06 19:22:48+00:00): Thank you very much for your comment and clarification. Fixed.
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 03:38:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77473601 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
philippec (2020-02-22 11:12:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1490424772
Was er eigenlijk al.  En ik denk ook dat het in die modernere gebouwen ligt.  Je kunt het eventueel aan koning Filip vragen.
L'imaginaire (2020-02-22 20:32:29+00:00): Bedankt voor de opmerking. Ik zie dat Jakka hier al een opmerking over maakt in een note. Zelf ken ik het daar niet, dus het zal aan iemand anders zijn om de oplossing te bieden.
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 03:40:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77473625 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
ndm (2019-11-21 22:02:59+00:00): One of the service roads is a footway -- I've fixed it.
uttarann (2019-11-22 07:03:23+00:00): Hi ndm,

Thanks for looking into my edit and correcting the edit. It was an honest mistake.Will take this as learning for future edits. Please let me know if anything needs to be changed. Always happy to learn from community.

Regards,
uttarann.
woodpeck_repair (2019-11-24 03:43:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77473645 where the changeset comment is: Revert copying of translations from Wikipedia
DavidKewley (2019-11-24 00:31:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please only map objects that actually exist. I've removed some that seem pretty clearly fictional. If this is in error, please reply here and help us understand why you drew them. Thanks!
A67-A67 (2019-11-21 14:36:21+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for adding extra information to this embassy.
However you deleted the tag amenity=embassy which is still used by maps like OSM-carto. So please keep that tag for compatibility. 
Besides you changed phone to contact:phone. Even https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact tells that the 'simple' tags should be used for common tags like website, email and phone.
zorae (2019-11-21 15:45:55+00:00): Hi there,
I agree! I have recently been convinced in favour of dropping the “contact” namespace. Where I’ve used it in the past, I’ll do my best to revert it to plain “phone” tags.

Regarding the amenity=embassy tags, you will need to raise this concern on the iD editor’s repository. iD’s automatic upgrade removes “amenity=embassy” tags. I have a high threshold for deviating from iD’s defaults.
A67-A67 (2019-11-21 17:13:10+00:00): Thanks!

Multiple concerns about the iD-editor are voiced. The main concern is that they ignore the community when they have another opinion. 

You shouldn't remove tags that are still used for compatibility. You don't have to add them to new embassies, but the removal is against OSM good practices. You can add both the old and the new scheme on the same node, as these tags don't use the same key.
mueschel (2019-11-22 09:10:50+00:00): Hi,
I found 325 nodes with the tag "generator:solar: modules" - could you fix the spelling and remove the space?

Thanks
Jan
SK53 (2019-11-22 11:58:49+00:00): Thanks. Looks like the tag should be deleted from a lot of them anyway. I must have inadvertently copied a node with that tagging, because I certainly did not intend to add the module number with these edits.
SK53 (2019-11-22 18:34:50+00:00): OK I've removed the tag (the figure of 18 was probably valid for 1 of them!)
abakus_uploader (2019-11-21 23:31:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Titoalm (2019-11-21 09:04:28+00:00): Added some buildings and extended a few roads
Glassman (2019-11-21 22:57:53+00:00): This is likely a driveway. If you JOSM instead of iD, you can use the WSDOT road overlay. It's a bit outdated but the state hasn't updated it yet this year.  The good news is that rural roads don't change that much.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77364705
AlesyaLisa (2019-11-25 09:50:31+00:00): Hi! Thank you for notice! I'm using ID and just a new mapper. What exact do you want to correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77364705
Glassman (2019-11-25 17:27:04+00:00): This note was just an tip to fix ways with wrong classification and to suggest using JOSM to use the Washington State roads overlay. 

Also - I noticed a number of new mappers all starting out with the maproulette challenge. Is this a school project or a work assignment? I'm happy to help your organization with this challenge.
AlesyaLisa (2019-11-26 09:35:37+00:00): We were starting to work with maproulette as a part of work training so our main goal was to correct roads. In all cases there are no enaugh information about road classification thus we decided to leave old tags and pay attantion on geometry. Thank you for your proposal but it was one day training and there are few chances that we will return to it again.
I really appriciate you for your tips and help! Have a good day!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77364705
Jakka (2019-11-22 08:21:25+00:00): Merci pour les corrections. "Modification du nom des rues" vous avez contrôler si les "building" leur adresse doivent être corriger ????
UeWY9YwY (2019-11-21 10:17:26+00:00): Ratusz niekoniecznie jest wykorzystywany (lub był kiedykolwiek używany) do celów administracyjnych. Wynocha z map jak nie masz pojęcia co robisz gostek.
maraf24 (2019-11-21 21:52:24+00:00): Proszę zmienić używany w komentarzach język, nie akceptujemy tutaj agresywnych i jadowitych wypowiedzi.
Glassman (2019-11-21 22:35:34+00:00): At best this looks like a track. One of the purposes of the challenge is to clean up from a 2007 roads import. Can you review this and correct the way if you agree?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77365081