piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
patzi (2016-11-01 13:25:28+00:00): I reverted your edit in order to fix the housenumber, in case you wanted to add something please have a look at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide first.
BellaW (2017-02-19 16:35:41+00:00): Apologize for the wrong comment description. It's canteen of Shanghai University..
trigpoint (2016-11-04 23:02:57+00:00): Tagging a driving test centre as a police staion seems very odd, it should be tagged as office=government.
You will need to use a proper editor to make this change, please ask if you need help.
trigpoint (2016-11-08 18:53:34+00:00): Maps.me user did not respond, fixed tagging
Hjart (2016-10-31 18:58:34+00:00): To "correct" the name in iD you have to remove the ":en" from the "name:en" tag (see the "all tags" fields). I've allready fixed it though.
Hjart (2016-10-31 18:11:46+00:00): Perronerne var markeret i forvejen, men dog med en enkelt linie hver (hvilket jeg foretrækker)
Hjart (2016-10-31 18:15:44+00:00): Stier og veje  mm skal helst forbindes til det omgivende vejnet. Ellers kommer routing ikke til at fungere korrekt.
Hjart (2016-10-31 18:36:52+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt iøvrigt og tak for dine bidrag indtil videre.
geow (2016-11-02 22:31:54+00:00): Hallo soemisch, vielen Dank für die Ergänzungen am Bahnhof Endorf! Ein Tipp zu Luftbildern in Bayern allgemein: In JOSM als Hintergrundlayer "Bayern 80 cm" wählen, die sind aktueller (im Durchschnitt 1- 1.5 a) und im Gegensatz zu Bing korrekt entzerrte Orthofotos der bayer. Landesvermessung. Wenn ihr noch Kapazität habt - der Bahnhof Aschau (Chiemgau) hätte auch noch ein gewisses Verbesserungspotential ;), siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/765325252
Danke, geow
soemisch (2016-11-03 09:14:03+00:00): Hallo geow,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich konnte den Hintergrundlayer finden und werde ihn weiter nutzen. 

Ich habe Dir auch den Bahnhof in Aschau bearbeitet. Er war ja soweit in Ordnung, so dass ich nur noch die beiden Bushaltestellen, eine Straße einzeichnen und andere kleine Änderungen ergänzen musste.

Viele Grüße, Lars
Chieftl (2016-12-08 16:39:05+00:00): Любава у вказаному місці відсутня. Мабуть, малася на увазі Любава на розі Січових-Мазепи.
Nakaner (2017-09-02 18:17:55+00:00): Hallo giggie,

vielen Dank für die Mithilfe am zweigleisigen Ausbau. Ich habe gerade noch ein paar Sachen berichtigt:

- Signale sind Nodes auf dem Gleis. Die Tags railway:signal:direction=forward/backward/both und railway:signal:position=left/right/in_track/overhead legen fest, wo das Signal steht und für welche Richtung es gilt.

- Es gibt ein langes Taggingschema für Signale in Deutschland. Für den JOSM-Editor gibt es Vorlagen (grafische Dialoge, die alle Infos abfragen, sodass du die Tags nicht von Hand tippen musst).

- Bitte verwende Namen nur für Eigennamen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Wenn du dort regelmäßig Züge fahren siehst oder mit ihnen fährst, würde ich mich freuen, wenn du dein Wissen in folgender Note (mit "t" = Fehlerbericht, mit "d" = Knoten/Punkt) mit uns teilen würdest. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1124902 Ich erwarte nicht, dass du die Routenrelationen anpasst.

Viele Grüße

Michael
trial (2021-07-06 16:11:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291932288/history (oui ça a 4 ans) : quand un nom est descriptif et en minuscules, il vaut mieux le virer que le passer en majuscules ;-).
redd (2022-09-01 18:42:51+00:00): Hi lorenzoguidotti,
thanks for you contributions over so many years to OpenStreetMap.
I found a small error from this changeset, may you please have a look at the roof shape of building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259201025 and that next to it?
Thanks,
redd
Alecs01 (2016-10-31 18:40:31+00:00): Ho tenuto l'indirizzo e cancellato il resto, per favore considera che le modifiche che fai sono visibili a tutti, grazie
literan (2016-11-01 11:21:28+00:00): residential это дороги в жилых районах. То, что здесь - это unclassified. Исправляю за вами.
RafalR (2016-10-31 22:46:06+00:00): Radio to nie sklep! Proszę zgłosić uwagę jeśli nie jest się pewnym co do typu wprowadzanych danych.
user_3022894 (2023-05-23 18:42:20+00:00): Das Setzen des "name" hier von mir war falsch.

Ich habe das nachträglich wieder rückgängig gemacht.

Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136468687
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-01 21:30:35+00:00): What is the source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/442706848/history ?
user_5359 (2016-11-01 06:46:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because routes aren’t member of the OSM database. Routes are combination of existing way (parts).
Martin Borsje (2016-10-31 18:49:36+00:00): Gerrit je hebt hier wederom landuse=residential aan een building toegevoegd.

Correctie en verklaring graag!
SomeoneElse (2016-11-01 08:14:25+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!
Just letting you know that you accidentally uploaded the "learnosm" test data along with some doodles into the middle of the Atlantic in this changeset.  Don't worry though - I've deleted them.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_5359 (2016-11-01 05:37:21+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kannst Du bitte die Position überprüfen? Eigentlich gehört ein Hotel in einem Gebäude und gut Internet soll angeblich im Ziegelfeldweg 32 ein Hotel existieren (aber ohne eigene Webseite) ...
ccamara (2016-11-07 10:09:05+00:00): Hola, sé que has estat mirant d'aplicar la jerarquia de carrers en funció de la informació de l'Ajuntament. Tot i així se'm fa extrany que un fragment del carrer Cristòbal de Moura sigui secondary mentre que Rambla Guipúscoa sigui tertiary. Ho comento perquè més enllà de que conec tots dos carrers i el nombre de cotxes que passen per guipuscoa és molt més elevat que el de cristòbal (tret de si mirem camions). Pensa que Guipúscoa connecta amb la ronda litoral i amb Sant Adrià de Besós, mentre que a Cristòbal de Moura no hi connecta cap via important (més enlà de Prim). Com ja et vaig comentar per la llista, desconec el criteri de primary, secondary i tertiary, però sospito que o bé caldria rebaixar Cristòbal de Moura o bé caldria augmentar la jerarquia de Guipúscoa i continuar la jerarquia de Cristòbal de Moura fins alguna via de prou entitat (ni Selva de Mar ni Ronda de St. Ramon de Penyafort la tenen)
GerdP (2017-08-30 10:36:39+00:00): Moin. Schau mal auf Tippfehler  highway=path;track
bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37605496
Passt hier evtl man_made=cutline besser? 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dcutline
maraf24 (2016-11-03 13:26:46+00:00): Z tym że adres był lekko inny w tym skasowanym punkcie. Dla softu jedna literka robi różnicę.
Glassman (2016-11-01 05:29:57+00:00): I wonder if worksource should be tagged as either office=government or office=employment_agency. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office for more info. [Community Centre](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre)
3D1T0R (2016-11-02 19:05:46+00:00): I don't know, I just thought it should be on the map. It's kind of a mix, partly government, partly community/social site, and while it's a place to get help in finding employment, they make a point of telling people that they're not an employment agency. I was using MAPS.ME when I made the change and the most fitting option it offered was "Community Centre", but I don't mind if it gets changed to something different.
Perhaps I should stop by and ask them what category they think they should be under?
Glassman (2016-11-02 21:17:46+00:00): I visited on many years ago in Seattle. I always assumed they were like a employment agency. Their [website](https://worksourcewa.com/microsite/Content.aspx?appid=MGSWAINFO&seo=about&pageType=simple) mentions help finding jobs as well as training services. I'd probably go with employment agency.

MAPS.ME has really improved their editor since it first launched but it still has limited tags. I mostly use it when I'm at a new restaurant.
BCNorwich (2016-11-01 07:05:49+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see you have also named that section of highway from the A143 south to Water Lane as Church Road. Your upload comment suggests you did not mean to add the name to the whole section. 

Please be aware that a highway can be edited to split the way into two sections, then editing or not editing each section independently. If you need help in splitting this highway please just ask.
maraf24 (2016-11-02 11:41:23+00:00): Cały las zniknął. 
Zmieniłeś go w mały budynek: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381604495
I co teraz?
maraf24 (2016-11-02 12:54:53+00:00): Ok, udało się odtworzyć.
RicoElectrico (2016-11-02 13:05:57+00:00): Ubiegłeś mnie, ale całe szczęście nic się nie zduplikowało. Jak przywróciłeś? Ja ściągnąłem z Overpass wg stanu na kilka dni przed i wszystkie obiekty zmodyfikowałem (bo inaczej nie wysłałby). Może dało się to jakoś sprytniej zrobić, bo reverter nie pomógł mi.
maraf24 (2016-11-02 13:27:19+00:00): Reverterem, z opcją odtworzenia tylko jednej linii.
Twoją metodę też rozważałem, gdyby powyższa nie zadziałała z wiadomych powodów.
maraf24 (2016-11-03 13:16:31+00:00): Jeśli wyrzuca ci timeout, to go zwiększ w socket.timeout.read. Domyślnie jest 30s.
ecatmur (2016-11-03 08:35:47+00:00): Thanks for spotting that. It looks like node 4350847036 was moved accidentally; I've moved the node back to where it was originally.
SomeoneElse (2016-11-18 14:18:41+00:00): Hello,
You've added a "landuse=forest" tag to http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1447414#map=15/47.9626/-120.2074 - is that really correct?  The relation is "Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest" i.e. it's a protected area - a "National Forest" in US terms, but that doesn't necessarily imply landuse=forest in OSM.
Carnildo (2016-11-29 19:47:13+00:00): I don't think it does.  Like most national forests, Okanogan-Wenatchee is used for a mix of logging, ranching, mining, hunting, and other things.  There are dedicated recreation areas and dedicated wilderness areas, and areas that are de-facto one or the other (generally due to inaccessibility), and it's not all forest.

Even as vague as the meaning of "landuse=forest" is, it doesn't make sense to apply it to the whole of a national forest.
richlv (2016-11-01 10:59:15+00:00): thanks a lot for the improvement - should it be marked as a "living street" ?
Uģis Spriņģis (2016-11-01 16:23:08+00:00): Hi,
did not know the difference between residential and living street - but probably yes.
richlv (2016-11-02 11:14:07+00:00): thanks for the response. if it's a normal , smaller street, it's residential. if it's in an area, marked by signs like http://www.iauto.lv/_mm/i/20160106/20795_4849c138b57.jpg , it's living street.
i'll update this one accordingly then :)
highflyer74 (2016-11-01 09:34:14+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, bei OSM mitzuarbeiten, würde ich Dir empfehlen, einen richtigen Editor wie iD oder am besten JOSM zu verwenden. Maps.Me ist zum Editieren keine gute Idee, da es nicht den aktuellen Stand der Datenbank abbildet und es somit oft zu Doppeleintragungen und anderen Problemen kommt (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits). Für Android kann ich den Editor Vespucci empfehlen.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
Mekru (2016-11-01 07:51:25+00:00): A greate edit
74523978 (2016-11-01 01:14:22+00:00): Nog onder constructie...
74523978 (2016-11-01 19:40:48+00:00): Voltooid.
praeteritum (2024-01-30 04:15:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146846253.
Ninjoh (2019-05-02 18:38:10+00:00): Hello Dan Gregory, 
it appears you have modified the geometry of the Richard Montgomery Exclusion Zone, as well as moved the wreck itself to the very edge of the exclusion zone, connecting it as a node to the way.
I assume the latter is just an accident, but I do wonder what your reasons and sources are for changing the geometry of the exclusion zone? You mention "MOD ABERPORTH" in your changeset comment, but it's not really clear to me why you mention it.
Ninjoh (2019-12-30 15:28:26+00:00): Well it seems you merely squared the zone, and scorp1035 actually moved the wreck. I reverted both changesets in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79019627
74523978 (2016-11-01 01:13:54+00:00): Nog onder constructie...
74523978 (2016-11-02 19:33:15+00:00): Voltooid zonder multipolygoon.
marczoutendijk (2016-11-30 14:03:43+00:00): Een markt is toch in de eerste plaats dit:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dmarketplace
praeteritum (2024-01-30 04:10:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146846251.
FTA (2017-01-14 20:21:26+00:00): Hi, can you please confirm where you got this data from?
Thanks,
Ethan aka FTA
您好，您能确认从哪里获得这些数据？
谢谢，
Ethan又名FTA
human890209 (2017-02-22 03:09:15+00:00): Hi,  I live around this park.
This is based on my own eye.
Don't know how to edit all my source tag.
Please help me change all my edit.
I lived in Shanghai.
human890209 (2017-02-22 03:11:34+00:00): And I've made some building level editing around The Bund. They are based on my own eye and estimation, too.
FTA (2017-03-05 23:32:27+00:00): Hi human890209,

Thank you for your confirmation of source. In JOSM, before you upload, the source tag is at the bottom of the upload window (here :http://i.imgur.com/uTc0DrU.png). For things you survey in person, you can write "survey". Or if you use the default Bing satellite imagery, write Bing. Just make sure you do not use or list a copyrighted source like you did here. We cannot modify source tags on prior edits, but your confirmation is sufficient for them.

Thank you,
Ethan

机器翻译

机器翻译

你好human890209，

谢谢您的来源确认。 在JOSM中，在上传之前，源标记位于上传窗口的底部（此处为：http：//i.imgur.com/uTc0DrU.png）。 对于亲自调查的事情，你可以写“survey”。 或者如果您使用默认的Bing卫星图像，请写Bing。 只是确保你不使用或列出受版权保护的来源，像你在这里。 我们无法在之前的修改中修改源代码，但您的确认对他们来说已经足够。

谢谢，
Ethan
eggie (2017-04-03 16:02:10+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
praeteritum (2024-01-29 04:56:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146803903.
praeteritum (2024-01-29 04:55:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146803866.
praeteritum (2024-01-28 00:25:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146763030.
praeteritum (2024-01-27 22:43:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146761123.
Klumbumbus (2016-11-26 15:55:21+00:00): Habe die Kurve wiederhergestellt in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43965969
Siehe https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=P6yL1wkq2hGO0VHAEsd9tg&lat=50.610152200000016&lng=12.510569799999985&z=17
praeteritum (2024-01-28 00:23:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146762964.
fkv (2022-02-06 00:33:33+00:00): This wasn't a typo but the normal spelling.
fkv (2022-02-06 00:35:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117064774 where the changeset comment is: revert 43317886
aceman444 (2022-07-09 18:44:26+00:00): Well, OSM wiki uses 'barite' (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:resource), which is used in most cases in OSM. Wikipedia mentions both spellings. So why do you want to have a unique spelling? If you are right, can you officially fix the OSM wiki and the tags across the world?
fkv (2022-07-09 19:31:19+00:00): I have no time for edit wars in the Wiki, and I've never said that "barite" was wrong. I just said that I had a good reason to spell it with "y", and that it wasn't a typo.
aceman444 (2022-07-09 20:04:22+00:00): So you want to leave it at wrong value just because I used a wrong changeset description?
fkv (2022-07-09 20:11:24+00:00): I already explained to you why it's not a wrong value.
aceman444 (2022-07-09 21:45:56+00:00): No you didn't. You only said 'barite' (my version) is not wrong and that you wrote 'baryte' intentionally. So tell me why baryte is not wrong. Somehow I do not see both of them being correct for OSM. Or do you argue those values aren't standardized yet so you hope the (maybe more correct) spelling of baryte becomes more used in OSM?
fkv (2022-07-09 22:07:55+00:00): I already wrote in my first comment that baryte is the normal spelling. Google reports 6.930.000 of baryte vs. 4.800.000  of barite. Of course I hope that my preferred spelling will outnumber the other spelling variant one day, but that only works if people like you don't attempt to "correct" the "typo", thereby reversing the normal course of tagging evolution. Words can hardly describe how evil your interference is.
aceman444 (2022-07-09 22:44:04+00:00): 6.9M vs. 4.8M isn't much difference to decide which one is more correct. I rather have a consistent spelling in OSM that can be easily mass-converted once once spelling is agreed on. But I understand what you mean now. Thanks.
praeteritum (2024-01-27 22:42:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146761019.
praeteritum (2024-01-26 04:14:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146695801.
scai (2016-11-13 17:54:50+00:00): Hallo BeKri,
du hast mehrere power=pole an Stellen gesetzt wo überhaupt keine Masten stehen, beispielsweise https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1517583999 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1517584003 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1018479119 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1520333324 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1517584007. Auch hast du bei diesen Knoten die Geometrie des Gebäudes kaputt gemacht. Die Gebäude sind jetzt nicht mehr rechteckig sondern krumm und schief.

Die angesprochenen Knoten habe ich auf die vorherige Version zurück gesetzt. Vermute aber der gleiche Fehler ist bei diversen anderen auch passiert. Prüfst du bitte nochmal deine Änderungen? Danke.

Grüße
Alex
BeKri (2016-11-13 19:38:57+00:00): Servus Alex,
ja, da ist mir leider ein ziemlicher Blödsinn passiert, was ich aber immer noch nicht ganz nachvollziehen kann.
Irgendwie habe ich es fertigbekommen, einen unklare Anzahl von Nodes um 2,36m zu verschieben ...
Ich habe mich auch bemüht alles wieder "richtigzuschieben" habe aber wohl immer noch was übersehen.
Danke für's richtigstellen und Entschuldigung für die Umstände.
Gruss derBeKri
ff5722 (2016-11-02 16:17:15+00:00): Hi, you removed the tags from this relation:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3227421

I have added them back, so it should be okay now. Please be careful about this next time. thanks!
praeteritum (2024-01-26 04:13:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146695576.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 07:04:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-01 06:55:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3887073513 ? Your entry was a duplicate entry. I have merged the information.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 06:51:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
praeteritum (2024-01-25 12:32:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146671652.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 06:51:23+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-01 06:50:45+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
praeteritum (2024-01-25 12:26:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146671583.
praeteritum (2024-01-24 11:22:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 146625302.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 13:42:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
PT-53 (2016-11-01 07:57:26+00:00): Hallo mappy,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz Straßen an das Bing-Luftbild angepaßt, ohne zuvor den Versatz zu berichtigen. Was soll das ?
Das ist eine Verschlechterung und keine Verbesserung !!
PT-53 (2016-11-01 08:44:55+00:00): Du hast die Straßen Baind und Heusteige von residential auf living_street geändert. Hast Du das vor Ort erkundet ?

Warum trägst Du maxspeed ein ?
Wiki-Auszug:
In Deutschland sollte maxspeed=7 nicht gesetzt werden, da die offizielle Geschwindigkeit in der StVO mit Schrittgeschwindigkeit angegeben ist
mappy123 (2016-11-01 11:07:41+00:00): Natürlich habe ich das vor Ort geprüft. Was soll der Mist solche Fragen zu stellen? Wenn du einen Fehler meiner Edits siehst darfst du es gerne mir mitteilen. Leute die Maps4BW blind abmalen meinen wohl andere prüfen nicht vor Ort. Das einzige wo du Recht hast ist mit dem Maxspeed, den Wikieintrag kannte ich noch nicht. Danke für den Hinweis, werde ich wieder ändern (obwohl ich es nicht gut finde da Navis dann keine Maxspeed Warnung rausgeben können).
PT-53 (2016-11-01 17:49:45+00:00): Wenn Du in Deinem Änderungssatz - so wie allgemein üblich - die Quelle Deiner Daten angeben würdest, wären solche Mist-Fragen überflüßig !

Ich male nicht Blind von Maps4BW ab, sondern gleiche immer noch mit Bing ab, ob die Gebäude noch bestehen. Dabei berücksichtige ich, daß Bing nur die Dachformen anzeigen kann, in  Maps4BW aber die EG-Grundriße angezeigt werden.  In OSM werden ja auch die EG-Grundriße gewünscht, sofern möglich. Oder liege ich da falsch ?
user_5359 (2016-11-01 07:48:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because I can’t see a big building with a restaurant on the aerial images!
rmarti55 (2016-11-01 17:51:23+00:00): Hi, I guess my addition was miscategorized, it should be a neighborhood not a restaurant, can you undelete and help me make the change? Thanks.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 18:45:18+00:00): I have add the neighbourhood again. You are welcome!