piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user345 (2022-06-18 09:20:26+00:00): Gerade mit der Straßenmarkierung an der Kreuzung Kerpener Straße führt dies meiner Meinung nach vor Ort zu unnötiger Verwirrung, da der Radweg eben nicht auf die Straße geführt wird, zumal ein hoher Bordstein nach wie vor eine bauliche Trennung darstellt. Aber wie auch immer, es ist jetzt alles wieder im Ursprungszustand.
aixbrick (2022-06-18 10:05:57+00:00): Danke
Wilmer Osario (2022-06-17 00:25:18+00:00): Hola, le pido amablemente que no modifique la clasificación de carreteras. Actualmente la comunidad venezolana estamos trabajando en crear un estándar para nuestro país:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Venezuela/Mapeo/de_Caminos
SeventhFret (2022-12-22 05:21:25+00:00): こんにちは。タグ付け感謝します。ウェイ: 1058297394のCycleway:laneキーについて質問します。
OSMwikiによると、普通自転車専用通行帯のタグ付けはcycleway:lane=both,left,rightで行うこととありますが、Zaneoさんは=pictgramを使用されているようです。
確かに、wikiにもhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:cycleway　と例がありますが、1.普通自転車専用通行帯は自動車との共用を意図しておらず、いわゆる自転車ナビマーク等とは異なること、2.CycleOSMなどの主要なレンダーに描画されないこと、3.Cycleway:laneキーと競合しほ科のタグをつけられなくなること
以上を理由にcycleway:lane=leftに変更したいと思いますが、つきましてはZaneoさんの意見をお伺いしたいと思います。
返答のない場合は1週間程度をめどにこちらで書き換えさせていただきます。
どうぞよろしくお願い致します。
Zaneo (2022-12-22 15:01:41+00:00): I am open to suggestions!

However I think in this case if you look at, https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=1058297394#map=20/35.65262/139.86360

You can see that this is a shared lane, which often has a bus interacting with parts of it.

Another nearby example: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=35.656779496964&lng=139.86364231458&z=17&pKey=1057896508085679

I think that it is important to indicate that this is not a dedicated lane...

I would like to preserve that it's a shared lane, and that it is pictogram. 

However I am very open to to discussion! Perhaps we could also ask Cycleosm to support these keys.

If you prefer to chat on Japan slack, or OSM discord please let me know.
SeventhFret (2022-12-22 15:36:57+00:00): 1. Your link is correct. I refer to way 1058297394.
2. Your nearby example doesn't directed to the road, hence wrong. Additionally, it shows an alternative of shared lane （i can see ブルーライン on your photos）which looks very similar to 普通自転車専用通行帯. Maybe this lead to confusion.
2. No, on the road, It's dedicated lane. You can see actual road here (https://goo.gl/maps/LKQypsgDfoFKWwVU8)


What is your claim? 
According to Japanese local OSM tagging, 普通自転車専用通行帯 is cycleway=lane. And Japanese law prohibiting car traffic on 普通自転車専用通行帯, but doesn't mention parking and stopping in it .  I also believes there is many variations of restriction and laws between countries, so bus interaction does not simply mean shared lane.

Hope it make sense.
SeventhFret (2022-12-22 15:38:26+00:00): For japanese tagging of cycleway, see here [JA:Tag:highway=cycleway - OpenStreetMap Wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:highway%3Dcycleway)
Zaneo (2022-12-24 00:39:05+00:00): I see I think in this case it's my mistake. Thanks for the correction.

However I think there are a number of 
cycleway:lane=shared_lane

Such as near: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2144984480

In the case of the way you mentioned I think it's my mistake. I can change it your suggested, or please feel free to change.
SeventhFret (2022-12-24 05:29:15+00:00): OK. I'd update it.

Speaking of cycleway:lane=shared_lane , your example of Ota city definitely looks like 自転車ナビマーク, which introduced by Metropolitan Police Department. [自転車ナビマーク・自転車ナビライン　警視庁](https://www.keishicho.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/kotsu/jikoboshi/bicycle/menu/navimark.html)
Arrow feathers and pictograms are maintained as road markings（路面標示） mixed with roads（車道混在） in the bicycle traffic space（自転車通行空間）. There are way more these markings than designated lanes.  You can see it on CycleOSM layer. The coarser dashed line is shared. The finer is designated.

Referring to OSM wiki, there's no strict rule to classify it yet, but I personally map these road marking as cycleway:lane=shared_lane. 
[JA:Tag:cycleway=shared_lane - OpenStreetMap Wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane)
I'm not sure how other people do. Seems like there are more confusion between 普通自転車専用通行帯 and ナビマーク、ナビレーン than distinguish correctly, though.
Ивайло (2022-06-17 15:11:07+00:00): Здравей,

Би ли почистил точките, които си маркирал като изходи, защото не са верни – нямат имена и номера, а това с име София не е и изход.
Как точно се обозначават изходи е обяснено във Вики:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway%20junction?uselang=en-GB
foreigner037 (2022-06-17 15:25:49+00:00): Изходите са направени 1:1 с тези по А1, както и по всички други магистрали в България.
Ивайло (2022-06-17 15:43:18+00:00): Извинявай тогава,
Щом така се правят у нас няма да те занимавам повече.
foreigner037 (2022-06-17 15:56:02+00:00): Няма проблем,
в България всичко се прави малко по-особено, включително и в OSM. Добавям ги чак сега, защото ми направи впечатление, че работата е свършена само наполовина и някои от изходите липсват.
Цифрите в самия изход не са номера, а километража на магистралата. Ако погледнеш непосредствено преди това, на края на А6, ще видиш че изхода за Варна е при км 64.
Относно този с име София - технически погледнато това е изход, защото там свършва трасето на магистралата и пътят се прелива в Ботевградско шосе.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-06-22 09:09:47+00:00): مرحبا بكم
لإضافة الاسم الانجليزي ضعه على الوسم name:en أيضاَ لو لديك اسم بديل ضعه على الوسم alt_name  
قمت بتصحيح ذلك وشكرا لكم
Hb- (2022-06-16 13:07:56+00:00): "Turning_point" assume as water well, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122464191
user_6920396 (2022-06-16 15:58:30+00:00): A bocznica jest nieużywana? Tory są zarośnięte a szyny pokryte nalotem?
KiPD Żelatowa nadal w swojej ofercie ma "Realizujemy również zamówienia koleją z własnej bocznicy kolejowej." Dodatkowo bocznica ma aktualne świadectwo bezpieczeństwa. Może jest używana sporadycznie? Widział Pan tam jakiś tabor?
VA00 (2022-06-16 17:15:02+00:00): Bywam tam regularnie. Ostatni raz wagony stały w 2013 r. Sosny rosnące pomiędzy szynami mają obecnie 1.5 metra. Obok ChZMO od kilku miesięcy stoi jakaś blokada w postaci dużego czerwonego prostokąta z białą obwódką, jeszcze przed przejazdem kolejowym (domyślam się, że to jakiś kolejowy znak końca trasy). Poza tym cała linia była bardzo długo odcięta na stacji Chrzanów, w rejonie nastawni Chrzanów Ch. Nie wiem czy  w tym momencie w ogóle da się na nią wjechać, trwa remont.
VA00 (2022-06-16 17:43:28+00:00): Taki znak: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/D1_(kolej)
Patchanka (2022-06-16 17:57:35+00:00): bonjour
je ne comprends pas trop votre modification. C'est un amphithéâtre ? Qui n'est accessible par personne ?
Par les clients du camping peut-être ? 
Par ailleurs il semble que ce soit également un bâtiment, je rajoute le tag approprié
Cath2021 (2022-06-17 13:36:29+00:00): oui et il ne doit pas remonter sur la carte bisca grands lacs grands publics.
merci.
Patchanka (2022-06-16 17:59:31+00:00): bonjour
je ne comprends pas trop votre modification. C'est un amphithéâtre qui n'est accessible par personne ? Cela ressemble à un lieu public...
ＵｗＵ (2022-06-16 13:29:17+00:00): Forgot to add source: Survey
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-16 21:55:44+00:00): Hello,

You added this park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1070311908/ over a building.

I can't find any evidence of a park with this name - do you have more information? County news articles or similar?
ItsKhole (2022-06-16 22:09:16+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out. I’m new to OSM and when I first logged in I wanted to put in some memorial parks, this was a practice one on top of my neighbours house actually and I forgot to delete it after. Do I have to login in and remove it myself or can someone else do it?
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-17 00:38:33+00:00): Hi!

I can delete it for you, no problem. Is there anything else I need to remove?
Wilmer Osario (2022-06-17 00:24:24+00:00): Hola, le pido amablemente que no modifique la clasificación de carreteras. Actualmente la comunidad venezolana estamos trabajando en crear un estándar para nuestro país:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Venezuela/Mapeo/de_Caminos
BCNorwich (2022-06-16 15:50:18+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your bollard Node: 9822707952 needs to be joined to a highway in order for it to make restrictions to a highway. At the moment it is not joined so makes no restriction.  Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
ksdjgfksjdhfksdf (2022-06-16 15:55:44+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Thanks a lot for spotting my mistake! I'm new to this so really appreciate your guidance. I've made a new change: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122470742#map=19/51.56141/-0.01245&layers=T - Please let me know if I've still got it wrong!
BCNorwich (2022-06-16 17:43:28+00:00): Hi There, Thanks for having a go. 

What you've actually done is to move the crossing point slightly north which is OK as that is now better positioned. But, it's the bollard that is the problem, it needs to be joined onto a highway in order to be a restriction to that highway.

I beg your pardon as I write I see the bollard re-render now joined to the highway. All is OK now.

Happy mapping.
Regards Bernard.
gscholz (2022-07-04 07:24:29+00:00): Hi PardonJiri,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSm database regarding overlapping ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122465930

I have reverted it to fix those issues.

Please educate yourself about what a "secondary" highway means.
Kid Regards
Guido
SomeoneElse (2022-06-16 17:23:57+00:00): Hello Jeremyah Lanum
Please use changeset comments that explain to other mappers what you have done.  "5653" does not do this.
Best Regards,
Andy
gscholz (2022-07-04 07:25:13+00:00): Hi PardonJiri,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSm database regarding overlapping ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122466100

I have reverted it to fix those issues.

Please educate yourself about what a "secondary" highway means.
Kid Regards
Guido
user_5359 (2022-06-18 06:34:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
4004 (2022-06-21 18:58:43+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
какой то новый магазин? на сайте у них пока не вижу
Андрей Бубнович (2022-06-21 19:07:09+00:00): Да, на сайте нет, а магазин есть. Можете съездить, посмотреть. Хотя, магазин - отстой( как и все Светофоры в последнее время), ассортимент не радует, хоть и площадь огромна.
4004 (2022-06-21 19:13:05+00:00): у нас принято верить на слово.
про ассортимент ожидаемо, по этому поводу были размышления не лучше ли отмечать их как мелкооптовые магазины вместо супермаркетов
Андрей Бубнович (2022-06-21 19:18:10+00:00): Наверное, да, мелкооптовый. Хотя площадь огромна - весь квадрат, что на карте помечен как "ИРИШ".
Андрей Бубнович (2022-06-21 19:22:16+00:00): Не пойму, почему на сайте нет его. Возможно, хозяева не уверены в успехе данной точки и этот магазин - временное явление. После февральских событий ассортимент Светофоров по моим ощущения существенно сократился и стали продавать откровенный шлак.
4004 (2022-06-21 19:26:44+00:00): переделаю в мелкооптовый, а то супермаркет вводит в заблуждение.
они и раньше не блистали какими то особенно интерерсными товарами, а нынче покупать российские товары еще и вопрос морали..
Андрей Бубнович (2022-06-21 19:30:56+00:00): Это точно👍. Не только российское. Купил ,не прочитав состав, какао-порошок и сгушенку производства Беларусь. Дома всё отправилось в мусорку. 😣
4004 (2022-06-21 19:36:48+00:00): Беларусь - сложный вопрос.

переделал светофоры в мелкооптовые по Гродно. в мапсми и органик мапс прилетит со следующим обновлением карт, или скачать завтра отсюда  https://download.openstreetmap.by/
Wilmer Osario (2022-06-17 00:05:38+00:00): Hola, le pido amablemente que no modifique la clasificación de carreteras. Actualmente la comunidad venezolana estamos trabajando en crear un estándar para nuestro país:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Venezuela/Mapeo/de_Caminos

-------------------

La "carretera vieja" no puede tener prioridades porque está inutilizada. Todo ese tramo del PN Cerro Saroche, coloquialmente llamado "Curvas de San Pablo" en la actualidad está prácticamente inexistente.

Todo el tráfico tanto nacional como local corre por la Carretera Lara-Zulia
gscholz (2022-07-04 07:24:49+00:00): Hi PardonJiri,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSm database regarding overlapping ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122466319

I have reverted it to fix those issues.

Please educate yourself about what a "secondary" highway means.
Kid Regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-07-04 07:24:11+00:00): Hi PardonJiri,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSm database regarding overlapping ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122466495

I have reverted it to fix those issues.

Please educate yourself about what a "secondary" highway means.
Kid Regards
Guido
mueschel (2022-06-26 17:19:17+00:00): Hi,
you added several objects with a strange tag "Museu = Parragem" - could you check and fix this?
Wilmer Osario (2022-06-17 00:06:28+00:00): Hola, le pido amablemente que no modifique la clasificación de carreteras. Actualmente la comunidad venezolana estamos trabajando en crear un estándar para nuestro país:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Venezuela/Mapeo/de_Caminos
ivanbranco (2022-06-16 19:52:59+00:00): Hi A Hall,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7771323

because of the merge the island has now two name=* and place=* values, could you check it out please?

Good mapping! :)
PT-53 (2022-06-16 17:39:15+00:00): Hallo hirschlp,
Das 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246319576/history
soll ein "shop" sein.
Was wird den dort an Endverbraucher "verkauft"?
Ist das kein Handwerker?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
user_9434724 (2022-06-27 20:03:05+00:00): Hello, thank you for your edits.
In your changes, you inadvertently broke a water relation, causing it to not be properly joined. This caused rendering issues, which I have now fixed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122926395
In the future, please make sure to be more careful when working with relations, as breaking them can cause big issues. Thanks :)
PT-53 (2022-06-16 17:34:22+00:00): Hallo hirschlp;
Willkommen bei OSM.

Ein Campingplatz (im OSM-Sinn)
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=camp%20site?uselang=de
wird das
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1070328547/history
wohl eher nicht sein.
Meintest Du vielleicht WoMo-Stellplatz:
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=caravan%20site?uselang=de
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
abakus_uploader (2022-06-16 22:32:30+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Glassman (2022-06-17 23:06:17+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122467258
Kovoschiz (2022-06-17 04:12:38+00:00): As I said before, please don't move lines upstream beyond the physical separation. `change:lanes=` is already used here.
Kovoschiz (2022-06-17 04:14:59+00:00): Secondarily, points on opposite directions are aligned to each other.
火箭苦力怕i (2022-07-17 10:29:54+00:00): 您是本地mapper吗？
Frans S (2022-06-17 10:30:01+00:00): Hello Matumbal.
In addition to my previous comment I noticed here that you combine 5 buildings into  1 mapping. Each building needs to be mapped individually.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122467552
tastrax (2022-06-20 05:01:16+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features 

To get the + symbol on a mobile device numeric keypad I reckon you will need to do a LONG press on the zero.
I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Glassman (2022-06-17 23:19:26+00:00): reverted - node placed in an empty space.
Patr1k_P (2022-06-17 19:08:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobré_komentáře_sad_změn
hanchao (2022-06-18 01:20:39+00:00): 不要乱改，已回退
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122528247
mapper377 (2022-06-16 15:10:10+00:00): Retag this power line segment from 138 kV to 345 kV. Also note that there are TWO electrical substations named "Faircrest Substation" about 2.0 miles apart. They are OSM ways 90522892 and 333527411. A survey of these two substations seems necessary.
Glassman (2022-06-17 23:06:50+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122468852
Waaslander (2022-06-16 15:04:37+00:00): GGRB => GRB
Leo Slager (2022-06-16 21:41:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Frans S (2022-06-17 10:25:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate enough and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122469425
bxl-forever (2022-06-17 10:36:52+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for adding more spots to the map.

That area seems invalid and will not show up properly on the map..
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/932543730
building=yes should be restored (this is still a building, right?)
area=yes should be removed
The name should be written in normal sentence case, not in small letters.
Couldn’t find anything with that name, anyway.  But I found something named "Cirque Mystic" on number 12, which is of type amenity=events_venue (couldn’t find a website, apparently they have an FB page).
GinaroZ (2022-06-16 18:56:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit :)
user_2066394 (2022-06-26 11:01:10+00:00): Das ursprünglich erfasste, längliche Gebäude wurde abgerissen?
jimkats (2022-06-22 22:55:17+00:00): Just because they are used frequently, they can't be upgraded. There are some guidelines decided by the Greek mapping community, based on the official road classifications (by the government). That's what should be followed while mapping the roads. There are also other tags which can improve a road's preference by the apps, besides the values of "trunk", "motorway", "primary_road".
nikospag (2022-06-23 09:30:53+00:00): Changeset reverted because is against general consensus
rskedgell (2022-06-19 06:43:40+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding the LTN filter. It's probably worth adding the tag bicycle=yes to the pedestrian segment, assuming the restriction there is "no motor vehicles".

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1070316703
ksdjgfksjdhfksdf (2022-06-19 15:52:55+00:00): Hi - thanks for the pointer! I've added this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122584549#map=21/51.56070/-0.01445&layers=C

Please do let me know if I've got it wrong.

Many thanks
pyram (2022-06-16 19:52:23+00:00): Hi Grinbert,

das Gebäude, das Du eingetragen hast, hat von dir die Adresse des bereits eingetragenen Nachbarhauses bekommen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442416457/history
Reparierst Du das bitte? Du scheinst ja Ortskenntnis zu haben, da Du die Adresse kennst...

Gruß
pyram
Grinbert 🙂 (2022-06-17 06:05:27+00:00): Hi pyram,
oh, tatsächlich. Danke 🙂
Ich habe mal die Hausnummer wieder rausgenommen. Das Gebäude scheint wohl zur 34 zu gehören, weil eine 34a oder so habe ich nicht gesehen. Der Eingang zur 34 ist aber dort, wo die Lücke war. Dummerweise habe ich keine Bilder gemacht und müsste nochmal hinfahren um sicher zu gehen. Irgendwie ist das Gebäude eine seltsame Konstruktion hier.
fabiotofy (2022-06-16 19:30:59+00:00): Ciao il nome attuale è Porto Mandracchio (https://grado.it/it/cosa-fare/la-citta/porto-mandracchio/). Mettiamo Porto Vecchio in alt_name ok ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122471745
Frans S (2022-06-17 12:24:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I don't know how you managed it, but you mapped 31 buildings twice, over each other on the same changeset  (122472348)
I removed the duplicated ones 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122472348
Mondal (2022-06-17 12:30:06+00:00): Thank you Frans! 
I am sorry for that. Maybe, I uploaded the data twice with JOSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122472348
Frans S (2022-06-17 12:30:17+00:00): Hi. Back again.
Another issue.
Please check and square all strict rectangular buildings.
I counted 53 not squared buildings.
Please use the Q key to square them.
Best regards
GDR! (2022-06-21 17:23:35+00:00): Obstawiam addr:place=Borzyszewo i brak ulicy, ale nie mam pojęcia jak to zweryfikować, dodałem numer z tabliczki widocznej z drogi.
Sandal man (2022-06-20 20:44:34+00:00): Gràcies per la teva contribució a l'OSM, però aquí estàs dibuixant un nou carrer a sobre de l'antic.
És millor adaptar el carrer existent.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1070370563#map=17/39.73774/-0.27968

Saludos Jan
Sandal man (2022-06-22 08:03:32+00:00): Esmenat
Sandal man (2022-06-22 08:05:46+00:00): La forma més nova s'elimina.
mikko_tamura (2022-06-17 04:29:58+00:00): great work rakshiya make sure to complete the task as this is also being counted
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122474001
Hufkratzer (2022-06-17 11:36:18+00:00): Wenn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129021634 eine Freifläche ist kann man da wohl das leisure=horse_riding + sport=equestrian entfernen  - oder? Wenn es ein Reitplatz wäre, müsste  leisure=pitch statt leisure=horse_riding dran.
Syl (2022-06-17 05:19:13+00:00): Bonjour, pour le moment l'école n'a pas de nom ?
Frederic1971 (2022-06-17 17:52:47+00:00): Non il est en vote lundi
Syl (2022-06-17 18:35:22+00:00): Ok, j'ai enlevé le nom vu qu'elle n'en a pas pour le moment.
Frederic1971 (2022-06-18 09:07:20+00:00): C'est bien