piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 21:14:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
gpstracks (2017-05-01 16:52:01+00:00): Buonasera.

Non mi risulta che la croce del Flagjel sia situata sulla vetta.
Lascerei il valore di "ele", ma toglierei quello di "peak=yes".
Inoltre, come ben saprà, non possiamo attingere ai dati delle cartografie commerciali.

Grazie
gion274 (2017-05-01 20:19:56+00:00): Ciao gpstracks,
l'aggiunta del natural=peak è, stata fatta perchè richiesta dal summit:cross=yes esistente (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:summit:cross%3Dyes)
il nome è stato tolto proprio perchè la cima è quella del nodo poco sopra quotato 1467 e nominato appunto Flagjel
la menzione su source alla Cartografia Tabacco (che cancellerò) serviva solo ad avvalorare la tesi della congruità delle due diverse quote tra l'altro presenti anche su cartografia non commerciale IGM, ma ho messo pure GPS e survey.

Tornando al merito se vogliamo far risaltare la Croce sui render il summit:cross senza natural=peak non vale nulla, la soluzione potrebbe essere cancellare tutto e mettere il nodo man_made=cross con ele=1455

che ne pensi?
gpstracks (2017-05-01 20:43:19+00:00): Buonasera
Premesso che comunque si tratta di una croce di vetta se pur non costruita sulla sommità, dobbiamo comunque ricordarci che mappare per il rendering è inutile e non è un problema di chi inserisce i dati. (Per quale rendering, poi? Mapnik per esempio non renderizza le croci di vetta sui "peak"),
per me va bene se vogliamo taggarla come man_made=cross.

In ogni caso, la cartografia IGM è protetta da copyright .
La Carta Tecnica Regionale FVG ha un DEM LIDAR ed una licenza compatibile.

Infine, dubito che sia semplice cambiare il commento di un changeset.

Mandi
gion274 (2017-05-02 07:34:34+00:00): Ho fatto la modifica man_made cross, per quanto riguarda il render mi riferivo a questo: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapsforge meglio se usato con elaborazione OpenAndroMaps (lo dico da escursionista).
Non ho cambiato il changeset ma solo la source sul nodo.
Ti ringazio per la specificazione su IGM e per l'indicazione della carta tecnica FVG
Ciao
mavl (2018-12-25 20:31:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
BCNorwich (2017-05-03 06:04:25+00:00): Removed duplication of the street. 

What is the area, unless stated it is meaningless?
mavl (2018-12-25 19:30:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:37:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:36:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_3216889 (2017-05-01 14:53:41+00:00): Tip: het terrein voor nieuwbouw even grofweg aangeven met een kader, voorzien van landuse=construction.
Dan weet jijzelf of een andere mapper dat daar t.z.t. nog wat aangepast moet worden.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:57:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:50:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Upendrakarukonda (2017-05-02 06:29:07+00:00): Hi Jokosch,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. The park you added here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490701907/history#map=18/51.69028/6.87268 Doesn't seems like a park according to bing imagery. Can you verify this?

Regards,

Upendra.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:22:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
EugenyN (2017-05-04 09:02:34+00:00): Нельзя писать имя объекта большими буквами ! Исправьте пожалуйста.  правила тут: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
user_3216889 (2017-05-01 21:22:49+00:00): Welkom geheten via PB.
user_3216889 (2017-05-01 21:31:14+00:00): addr:housename gewist en overgezet naar name
Miselajus (2017-05-06 21:02:47+00:00): Hallo,
auf einer Internerseite über Bergbautauchen  ist (neben einer "Schiefergrube Christine (Willingen)" auch eine "Schiefergrube Brilon (Schwalefeld" erwähnt. 
Ich habe da Fragen, die du vielleicht beantworten kannst:
Ist das ein Eingang zu dieser Grube? Gibt es noch andere Eingänge? Ist das Bergbautauchen hier auch aktuell möglich?
Gruß M.
Stremmer (2017-05-07 12:37:23+00:00): Ja, das ist der Eingang zur Schiefergrube Schwalefeld.
Ob Höhlentauchen hier aktuell möglich ist kann ich nicht sagen.
http://112-magazin.de/kb-retter/item/18038-willingen-49-j%C3%A4hriger-stirbt-nach-tauchunfall-in-schiefergrube-christine
http://www.toms-tauchshop.de/
Vielleicht gibt es hier mehr Infos. Warum allerdings bei der Schiefergrube Schwalefeld auch "Brilon" dabei steht kann ich nur so erklären das der letzte Betreiber wohl aus Brilon kam. Der Zusatz Brilon kann definitiv gelöscht werden.
Stremmer (2017-05-07 12:38:07+00:00): Einen anderen Eingang kenne ich nicht.
Miselajus (2017-05-07 21:09:12+00:00): Danke für die Infos und die Links. Den Tauchladen in Gießen habe ich danach eingetragen.

 Wie man allerdings einen Anbieter von Tauchkursen und -expeditionen am besten in die OSM-Datenbank einträgt, müsste ich auch erst noch erforschen. 

Und für den Eintrag eines Eingangs zu einem historischen Stollen, der inwischen geflutet ist und aktuell für Tauchgänge genutzt werden kann, warte ich auch noch auf einen "Geistesblitz". Ich wusste bisher überhaupt noch nicht, dass es so etwas gibt. Schönen Gruß Miselajus
jaap de vries (2017-05-02 07:04:29+00:00): Wat bedoel je met "w" te vermelden?
Wat heb je gedaan?
bkowshik (2017-05-17 03:21:12+00:00): Hey Makiyama,

The feature doesn't seem to have properties. We could potentially add a building and a name tag.

Thank you, Bhargav
saikabhi (2017-05-02 05:52:08+00:00): Hi,

Again in this changeset, you are tagging parks with multiple leisure=* tags. That might not be required. Can you just review your edits and remove any unnecessary tags for parks that you have created?

Thank you again for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Cheers,
Abhishek
highflyer74 (2017-05-02 14:54:24+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Die vorherigen Änderungen an den Wegen sehen gut aus, hier bei den Supermärkten ist etwas Chaos entstanden. Der Parkplatz war eine sich selbst überschneidende Linie und teilweise mit dem Gebäude verklebt. Jetzt müsste es passen. Vielleicht kannst Du noch einmal drübergucken, ob es so der Realität entspricht.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AWikiStart) ans Herz legen.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Auch möchte ich Dich zu unserem monatlichen OSM Treffen in Bremen einladen. Informationen dazu gibt es hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Veranstaltungen

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB,

Oliver
Miselajus (2017-05-01 18:06:19+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier einen Pfad gelöscht. War das so gewollt oder ein Versehen? Den Pfad hattest du kurz zuvor mit "Mühlenkopfstraße" benamt. Wolltest du vielleicht nur den Namen wieder zurück setzen?
Gruß M.
Stremmer (2017-05-01 18:32:04+00:00): Hallo, den Pfad gibt es so nicht, evtl. Nur im Winter als Loipe. hinter dem Gutshof ( Adresse übrigens Mühlenkopfstrasse 7) geht ein Pfad links hoch über eine Brücke, durch die Wiese ist ein Holzsteg bis zur Straße gebaut. Vor dem Gutshof ist ein asphaltierte Straße von min vier Meter breite.
Miselajus (2017-05-01 19:15:42+00:00): Danke für die Info. Den Zuweg zum Gutshof habe ich nach deinen Angaben und Luftbild ergänzt.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:37:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-05-01 17:37:50+00:00): MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-05-01 17:39:52+00:00): merged school at bagnode and removed duplicate
mvexel (2017-05-02 02:44:48+00:00): Thanks for editing OpenStreetMap and welcome!

There is a Utah OSM mapper group based in SLC, we would love to welcome you! https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Utah/
mavl (2018-12-25 20:05:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:12:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
bkowshik (2017-05-17 03:02:34+00:00): Hey Lotfi_Dtg,

I don't see any properties for the feature you added.

Thank you,
Bhargav
demon_box (2017-05-11 20:45:15+00:00): ciao, hai modificato da barrier=chain a barrier=gate ma si tratta di una catena (verificato ieri sera) quindi era giusto prima. lo correggo. grazie.
--enrico
mavl (2018-12-25 19:45:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
saikabhi (2017-05-02 05:49:04+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. This way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468752230 was tagged with multiple leisure=* tags. Removing all the other tags and keeping only leisure=park. That one tag should be enough.

Thank you
Abhishek
mavl (2018-12-25 21:50:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:08:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
letihu (2017-07-09 19:49:19+00:00): Warum führt sie Bahnlinie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39195736/history
denn durch das Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87550611/history?
Streckensucher (2017-07-09 20:23:59+00:00): Das habe ich doch extra als note-Tag an das Bahngleis rangeschrieben. ;-)

Die Südecke der Kreuzung ist teilweise überbaut, d.h. die Fassade Erdgeschosses des Gebäudes ist gegenüber dem rechteckigem Grundriss der Obergeschosse zurückgesetzt. Dadurch ist unter den Obergeschossen Platz für den Fußweg und die Fahrspur Steinstraße → St.-Annen-Straße, in der auch das Gleis verläuft.

Der way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8755061 stellt nur den Grundriss der Obergeschosse dar. Das Erdgeschoss müsste wohl als extra Gebäudeteil eingetragen werden. Leider kenne ich mich mit 3D-Mapping oder Gebäudemodellierung nicht aus.
letihu (2017-07-10 07:44:59+00:00): Schlimmer Fehler von mir :-(
Hab' ich leider übersehen.
Kennst Du dich dort aus? Ist der Straßenverlauf dort wirklich im große Bogen? Hier fehlen auch noch viele railway=level_crossing.
Streckensucher (2017-07-10 15:39:59+00:00): Der Straßenverlauf war nicht so ganz optimal eingetragen. Ich habe die Verbindung Neustädtischer Markt ⇄ Steinstraße jetzt mal geradegezogen.

Mit dem railway=level_crossing tue ich mich bei straßenbündigem Bahnkörper (in der Steinstraße und in der Hauptstraße und damit auch auf der Kreuzung) schwer.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:11:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
maraf24 (2017-05-01 18:11:36+00:00): Ta edycja jest do wycofania, ten adres jest błędny.
gallseife (2017-05-08 21:38:59+00:00): What did yo do to "Ligne de Belfort à Delle"?
It's not disused. Until Morvillars it's in use and the section Morvillars-Delle is due to reopening in 2018.
Where is the newly build second bridge of this line at gare Belford-Montbelliard? Did yo destoy it as well?

Please correct the line.
Denis_Helfer (2017-05-11 15:21:40+00:00): According to SNCF; Belfort-Delle is "neutralisée" since 2006 (disused). I verified that information from inside the entreprise. 
It will re-open on December 2017 (SA 2018).
The whole line  will be updated when new aerial images (post 2015) are available

Denis, GIS tech at SNCF in Strasbourg
gallseife (2017-05-11 19:05:55+00:00): The edits to delle and Belford-Montbelliard are actual not based on aerial images but on my own surveys.
The abandonded layout at both places you removed too.
Keep the line disused until december if you like. But my actual field based track edits I'd like to see again. And abandonden tracks shouldn't vanish form the Database too.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:22:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:32:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:42:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:40:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Supaplex (2017-05-01 17:30:52+00:00): 洞穴的標示可參考：
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cave
Vintagejhan (2017-05-02 06:21:42+00:00): 哈 我都差點忘了這個那個點本質是個洞穴說，趕緊來補標一下
saikabhi (2017-05-02 05:42:20+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset, for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151479829 you have changed landuse=residential to landuse=meadow which appears to be incorrect. Can you please change the tag back to the previous state?

Thanks,
Abhishek
mavl (2018-12-25 19:52:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
nevw (2017-05-02 03:04:21+00:00): I added the tag man_made=pier to the Dockside Walk piers
Mike Geo (2017-05-02 16:03:19+00:00): thanks
mavl (2018-12-25 21:11:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:47:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:23:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:37:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:51:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:46:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:52:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Baloo Uriza (2017-05-01 23:38:56+00:00): There's not really any tags to this point... what was added?
mueschel (2017-05-08 19:54:33+00:00): Hi,
could you check the name of this street? It only has a "nameol" and "old_name" tag.

Cheers, Jan
mavl (2018-12-25 21:39:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:30:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:37:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Commodoortje (2017-05-01 16:40:22+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik een aantal aanvullingen verricht.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48312252
Skippern (2017-05-03 00:50:56+00:00): Isso deve ser um ponto de ônibus?
lyctkel (2022-05-22 06:30:53+00:00): Hi mcld,
what kind of material is recycled at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4829130916 ?
I have no idea what recycling=card stands for.
Regards,
lyctkel
mcld (2022-05-22 09:55:12+00:00): Thanks for checking. In British English, "card"=="cardboard", but I'm afraid this edit was a long time ago so I don't knwo what exactly is handled here. I see from taginfo https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/search?q=recycling that "recycling:cardboard=yes" would be the modern tag for this...
lyctkel (2022-05-22 20:33:34+00:00): Hi mcld,
thank you for the fast reply.
I have added recycling:cardboard=yes
and ask in a fixme tag for confirmation.
Regards,
lyctkel
TrekClimbing (2021-01-17 09:33:35+00:00): Have been looking at this and think the culvert needs changing to run near straight down and join the eastern leg, and that the western leg is fed from Harrison Wood / Upcroft house. The eastern leg seems more visible on latest bing imagery. Did you hear the culvert when walking across, or just near the start? Thanks
sorcrosc (2017-05-01 17:26:33+00:00): Per favore controlla la classificazione dei tracciati. Alcuni percorsi non pavimentati li hai taggati come tertiary