piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-02-19 15:35:19+00:00): Dag PReff... 
Goed om de zaken actueel te maken. 
Op de nieuwe rotonde heb ik junction=roundabout toegevoegd  anders gaat het verkeer een willekeurige kant uit. 
Ook de tagging op het verplaatste fietspad heb ik weer conform de voorlaatste tagging gemaakt. G11.
Tip: Wanneer de Rembrandtschool een ROC is (MBO)  dan taggen we het als amenity=college ipv school. 
Kijk je nog even? 
MVG,
Eggie
Capello13 (2020-02-19 20:59:44+00:00): Bonsoir,
Je vois que vous avez ajouté recycling:glass=yes à un [container de recyclage](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/650835153#map=19/45.83921/1.24706).
D'après le wiki ce tag convient pour le dépôt de tout type de verre, ce qui n'est pas le cas des containers qui se limitent aux bocaux et bouteilles en verre, déjà supportés par le tag recycling:glass_bottles=yes
Pour moi ce tag recycling:glass est de trop.
Cordialement,
gfdklgdldsfgkgfd (2020-02-20 11:13:52+00:00): C'est corrigé sur 14 noeuds de Limoges Métropole.
Merci d'avoir repéré mon erreur :)
Bien cordialement
Discostu36 (2020-02-20 06:32:58+00:00): Ist da wirklich ein Pavillon und hat er wirklich diesen Namen? Oder ist das nur der Versuch, zu dokumentieren, dass es an diesem Ort Livemusik gespielt wird?
Vinber (2020-02-21 09:03:59+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

nouvelle-nouveau, un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, alors s'il vous plait, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628

Et n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...
eggie (2020-02-19 17:47:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
emvee (2020-02-29 09:04:21+00:00): Hi,

With this changeset Rue Boardman (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/774679436) got:
-bicycle=use_sidepath
-cycleway=lane
-cycleway:right=track
-oneway:bicycle=yes

That is a confusing set of tags, Osmose is giving a warning for it: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?source=415716&item=3032&class=30329

Can you have a look and update the tags to be more consistent, see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath

Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2020-02-29 12:29:54+00:00): Fixed!
emvee (2020-02-29 13:55:46+00:00): Thanks, looks good for cycling now!

On: sidewalk=both, this conflicts with foot=use_sidepath and the actual sidepath's mapped, so better remove it also.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2020-02-29 16:26:35+00:00): sidewalk=both specifies that there are sidewalks on this road. use_sidepath just tell routing engine to use the sidewalk way instead of the street way. This should not trigger a problem, since the sidewalk tag is used to characterize streets. These are two different informations. When we compare neighbourhoods for pedestrian network quality and security, we use the sidewalk tag to find the percentage of streets with no sidewalk, at least one sidewalk or two sidewalks. When we use a routing engine, we use the use_sidepath tag instead.
emvee (2020-02-29 17:00:56+00:00): I think routing engines interpret foot=use_sidepath as foot=no while sidewalk=both is interpreted as this ways has sidewalks so you can walk.

Reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks things are no crystal clear but on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way I read: "The corresponding highway can also be tagged with sidewalk=separate."
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2020-02-29 17:24:00+00:00): Every routing engine has a different process to parse tags. In OSRM, we can specify use_sidepath as foot=no, so everything works. And in our analysis, we use sidewalk=no, right, left or both to characterize pedestrian security and quality. I am open for suggestion to change this behavior, but it would invlolve lots of works on our side to modifiy the paradigm. Who decided to trigger an error in Osmose for that specific issue?
emvee (2020-02-29 18:56:54+00:00): > Who decided to trigger an error in Osmose for that specific issue?

There is no warning (yet) in Osmose for foot=use_sidepath + sidewalk=both, for cycleway check was added Oct 2019, see https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/commit/36aa2f11428caaadd4b30e1e5064b7d3d3f9f50e

The reason I triggered on sidewalk=both with foot=use_sidepath is that when you replace sidewalk by cycleway and foot by bicycle you will trigger the Osmose warning. Like written I think matches https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2020-03-02 20:38:57+00:00): OK, I will try to fix these
abakus_uploader (2020-02-19 23:30:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
!bm (2020-02-19 17:51:33+00:00): Hallo erantr1! Kannst du bitte erklären, was du hier gemacht hast und weshalb? Hast du eine Vort-Ort-Besichtigung (survey) durchgeführt? Vielen Dank! --besteGrüße!bm
erantr1 (2020-02-20 09:32:57+00:00): Hey!
I've never been there, but I got a report from a local that it's forbidden to cross the intersection, coming from North to South. I checked the map and there was a restriction already (both from N to S and from S to N), but it was ill-defined - a turn restriction has to have "from" "to" and "via" roles, and these 2 missed some of the roles. So I deleted them and created new ones.
!bm (2020-02-20 13:31:04+00:00): Hey erantr1!
Thanks for your fast reply, I really appreciate it. However, I think you are somewhat mistaken on relations and how they would apply to that very case: Firstly, both relations were already defined with from-to-via-roles. The via-role was in both cases the same way 37226922 (not a node, as you might have expected): the short link (formerly mistakenly named Ruschestraße too, now fixed*) between the seperately mapped directions of Frankfurter Allee—OSM wiki seems to refer to this sort of ways as "dual carriageway". This is crucial, as in case of a left turn from either street into FfA, you need to get to the opposite way of FfA. (Their oneway=yes should prevent any routing engine from an early left turn into the first way). Secondly, according to the latest available imagery from mapillary (dating 2019-08 1Kv9qBN7WtUq1dca6YGZsA SchulzeBoysenStr to north, 2018-09 SEzT0pF_ybZDj885gASpYw Ruschestr to south), the traffic_sign to be found in both SBs and Rs is DE:214-30 (formerly aka DE:209-31), depicting left-or-right-turn-only, translating to a restriction=no_straight_on (as it had already been mapped). Disallowing routing _to_ the link (again: way 37226922, extending SBS – Rs) between FfA-ways, actually results in only allowing right turns. I have tested and confirmed this for both directions for each navigation scenario (left-turns, straight-on crossing, straight-on into link, right-turns), both before and after updating to the version including your changes, with the routing in OSMand (as it updates almost instantly opposed to the standard webbased routers I know of). Given your explanations and the forementioned imagery, I think your changes did not reflect what you intended to achieve, nor would it represent the current situation accurately, as far as I am aware of – thus I have fully reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81272206 
*I have also fixed the misnamed link in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81273568 
If you believe this to be a mistake or misunderstanding, please do present further evidence so we can sort this out. Thanks again for your cooperation & happy mapping!
--bestregards!bm
erantr1 (2020-02-23 11:22:40+00:00): No, you got my intentions right! So thank you for fixing it, and sorry for the mess.
viloan (2020-02-19 15:48:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jillis inactivE (2020-07-28 08:14:35+00:00): Hoi, dit is al lang de Rembrandtschool niet meer maar het VAVO Lyceum. Dat had ik er ook al een jaar geleden vastgelegd. Waarom heb je dit zo aangepast?
Jillis inactivE (2020-07-28 08:27:37+00:00): Ik heb 'VAVO Lyceum' van het gebouw gehaald, dat had ik op het schoolterrein moeten zetten. 'Rembrandtschool' zou m.i. nog aangepast moeten worden, mee eens? 
Het is overigens wel een school, geen college zoals eggie stelde, want het betreft geen MBO opleidingen hier. Dus dat deel is goed.
PReff (2020-08-04 07:43:06+00:00): Volgens rijksmonumenten.nl is de naam van het gebouw "Rembrandtschool". Dat heb ik aan de kaart willen toevoegen. De huidige functie van het gebouw is inderdaad VAVO-lyceum van ROC Midden Nederland.
PReff (2020-08-04 07:43:44+00:00): Zie: https://rijksmonumenten.nl/monument/517716/rembrandtschool/amersfoort/
Jillis inactivE (2020-08-04 07:51:51+00:00): Ok, maar dan zou het gebouw die naam moeten krijgen, niet het schoolterrein.
Vavo lyceum moet ook op de kaart staan, dat zou dan de naam van het terrein worden.
PReff (2020-08-04 07:56:33+00:00): Daar ben ik het mee eens, dat is dan niet goed gegaan. Pas jij het zo aan?
Jillis inactivE (2020-08-04 08:13:18+00:00): Gedaan. Ik heb ook de viskraam meegenomen. Die heet geen 'opslag vishandel' maar 'Agenent'.
PReff (2020-08-04 08:20:54+00:00): Correctie: de vishandel heet Agenant . Echter deze kiosk wordt niet meer gebruikt als vishandel, er wordt geen vis verkocht, het dient alleen als opslag van materiaal en verkoopwagen. Vishandel suggereert dat je er vis kan kopen.
Vinber-Pro (2020-02-20 08:58:55+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue la CC de Montesquieu !

Petit mot d'accueil : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Sinon pour l'instant vous renseignez le nom des entreprises correspondant au bâtiment, ce qui est super, mais renseigner encore plus précisément le type d'entreprise serait encore mieux (quelques exemples ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dcompany)

Bonne carto
mueschel (2020-02-21 10:36:13+00:00): Hi,
please check your import of boundaries - there are 5 new relations with foreign tags and overlapping ways.

Few days ago I fixed the boundaries around Fragoso, please have a look there to check how they should be mapped.

Thanks!
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-02-19 21:29:46+00:00): hi, are these public access?
Dentis2L (2020-02-21 16:54:27+00:00): Hi Nuno,

I walked these veredas recently and there was no sign or gate to indicate they are not public. I'll double check with a local that was born and living in the are.

Thank you
Dentis2L (2020-02-23 12:18:57+00:00): Hi Nuno. I checked with a local who was born from family living there the entire life. I removed a little part of the vereda which has questioning public right of way. The rest are all public. I took some photos which have GPS tagging on them from these new veredas:
https://staticzone.s3.amazonaws.com/Lugar-veredas.zip

Higino, my local buddy will try to find out the names of these veredas from the elder since the camera can't be bothered to put some signs up. If you have any sources where I can find out the names of these veredas, please let me know. Are you living on the island? If so, would love to meet and chat about Madeira, maps, hiking, etc. Thank you,  Alex.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-02-23 12:54:35+00:00): Hi, thanks for your justification. Yes I'm a local contributor to OpenStreetMap and Mapillary. Try to keep up with mapping constantly at osm. We also have a Telegram group of portuguese OpenStreetMap contributors
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-02-23 12:55:49+00:00): Here's the link if you wanna join us OSMPortugal
Comunidade OpenStreetMap em Portugal
https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-08 17:06:07+00:00): Poprawiłem - to nie jest przysiółek a zniszczona wieś
SomeoneElse (2020-02-19 16:46:28+00:00): Hello again Alpha1976,
Back in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81128041 I asked you to use good changeset comments so that other mappers can understand what you're changing and why.
Please do make sure that you do that.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-02-19 16:53:46+00:00): One more thing - you've said in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81129052 that "My other accout was blocked because of one crazy guy".  It wasn't.  I asked you first in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3429 and then in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3442 to make a number of changes to the ways that you are mapping things:
Reply to changeset discussion comments (which you've now started doing - thank you), use meaningful changeset comments (which you're not really doing yet), and not to map things as things that they are not, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/695912637/history .  You've actually changed that to a "recreation_ground" since I last raised this with you!
If you don't address all these issues then you'll be prevented from editing OSM for a period of time.
Best Regards,
Andy
abakus_uploader (2020-02-19 23:30:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
syntex (2020-02-20 07:47:22+00:00): Pomimo, że wiadomość automatyczna to odpowiem, ktoś edytujący wcześniej dodał nieprawidłowe znaczniki addr:place Zieleniec zamiast addr:city Duszniki Zdrój i addr:street Zieleniec i nie usunąłem dwóch z nich(inne usunąłem) Teraz jest już poprawione
jendrusk (2020-02-21 08:31:46+00:00): Cześć. Tak, bot nie jest idealny - nie sprawdza czy błąd powstał w wyniku bieżącej edycji czy był już wcześniej... nie mniej po części zamierzony cel został osiągnięty - poprawiłeś, mimo że błąd nie był Twój - dzięki temu mamy lepszą mapę.
Dzięki i Pozdrawiam
Andrzej
viloan (2020-02-19 16:46:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2020-02-23 09:44:26+00:00): Hi,
could you please describe what this node represents? The tag 'communication:Estaçãod_e_telefonia_Fixa' is not used anywhere else.
Thanks!
czubi (2020-02-21 20:09:34+00:00): Das Creaton Werk brauchst du nicht zusätzlich als MP zusammenzufassen, es steht ja schon am landuse dran, und alles was innerhalb des Landuses ist gehört ja schon automatisch zum Werk.
Keep it simple. Habe das MP gelöscht, das andere was du gemacht hast ist prima. Weiter so!
user_1566574 (2023-02-23 18:34:36+00:00): Hello !
Pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126094473, suite à ton « fixme=Garage poids lourd. Quel tag ? », j'ai mis shop=truck et remplacé building=industrial→retail.

À titre informatif, en espérant que ça te convienne, j'upload les modifs dans la soirée et je t'en souhaite une très bonne ! A++ ! ;)
will_p (2020-02-19 17:45:01+00:00): I don't think entrance=home is correct for entrances to apartments. The wiki description suggests it is for entrances to single properties ("Door to a private house, home or an apartment") while all the entrances you have changed here lead to over 10 apartments. I have set these to entrance=apartments instead.
user_5359 (2020-02-23 09:26:51+00:00): Hello! What ist the meaning of the key styleUrl ? By the way, relations with only one member are not necessary.
muralito (2020-02-20 00:04:13+00:00): Hi CapAhab.

Thanks for this changeset.

Note that this four new roundabouts have  IMHO a very bad design (in real world). Approaching them the max speed is 30 km/h and only one lane. :-(

Maxar imagery already shows them?
CapAhab (2020-02-20 00:27:35+00:00): Hi muralito,

Two of the roundabout are visible in Maxar Imagery in iD.  I left the speed changes in the locations they already were, without having on the ground confirmation of signs.  I changed lane tags as I saw in imagery.  But I agree they don't look like a very practical design for a major trunk road.. 30 km/h is very slow!
4004 (2020-02-23 23:10:07+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за правки.
"Продукты" - это, как правило, не название магазина, а надпись на вывеске. То что там продают продукты понятно из тегов магазина (shop=convenience). Эконом же там фигурировал в доках вроде, в 2018.
Террабайт - там вообще есть еще этот комп магазин? а то я думал там все сьехали кроме обувного
eggie (2020-02-19 18:15:50+00:00): Dag Michiel..
Je hebt de bank verwijderd. Dat is oke. 
Nr 60 was een supermarkt. Je hebt de shoptag verwijderd, maar niet de naam name=Attent.
landuse=residential is een tag die op een vlak hoort (niet op een node) en dus  de bebouwde kom aangeeft. 
Die regel dus verwijderen. 
residential=apartments kan ook weg. Op het vlak zelf: building=retail kun je vervangen door building=apartments
Kijk je nog even?

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-02-19 23:08:54+00:00): Aangepast... naar juiste tagging appartement.
Gr eggie
czubi (2020-02-20 17:21:15+00:00): Hallo complete_gth, 
die privaten Garageneinfahrten mit amenity=parking_entrance zu taggen halte ich für keine gute Idee. amenity=parking_entrance ist eher für öffentliche Tiefgaragen oder Parkhäuser gedacht.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance
czubi (2020-02-20 17:24:07+00:00): Was auch nicht so richtig zusammenpasst ist building:levels=* und height=* gemeinsam. Da reicht es wenn du eins nimmst. Die widersprechen sich nämlich sonst.
czubi (2020-02-20 17:29:39+00:00): Also entweder Dach und  Gebäude mit height oder mit levels.
czubi (2020-02-22 14:58:44+00:00): Soll ich die amenity=parking_entrance für dich löschen? Mit JOSM geht das mit wenig Aufwand
complete_gth (2020-02-22 17:30:47+00:00): Ok, danke für die Hinweise. Ich ändere es. Brauchst nichts machen.
Dimacn (2020-02-20 12:59:25+00:00): Скажите пожалуйста, зачем вы добавили детские площадки поверх уже существующих? Зачем вы насоздавали дубли?
mueschel (2020-02-21 11:01:12+00:00): Hi,
you added two ways with a strange tag, could you check this?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/774729827

Thanks!
Mark Martinec (2020-02-21 13:02:10+00:00): Oops, fixed now on both ways. It is a row of trees. A cut&paste mistake, thanks for noticing!
user_5359 (2020-02-20 05:02:53+00:00): Please understand and follow: In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is CA instead of Canada.
user_5359 (2020-02-20 05:02:59+00:00): Please understand and follow: In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is CA instead of Canada.
user_5359 (2020-02-20 05:03:07+00:00): Please understand and follow: In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is CA instead of Canada.
joost schouppe (2022-03-25 15:27:19+00:00): Hi felixi,
I think you mapped this camper site from your own experience, but you do mention park4night. It is not allowed to copy from there. I removed the reference to park4night from the name. If you happen to still know some of the details of this place (cost, existence of a sanitary dump station, etc) it would be very useful to add them. You could do that with https://mapcomplete.osm.be/campersite if you like.
Adamant1 (2020-02-23 23:14:16+00:00): Hey, it  you mapped you the bus platform relation wrong. It wouldn't involve the office or bathrooms. Mostly just footway area. Since that's where people stand to wait for the bus. Not in the office. I'd say to that the roofs wouldn't count as the platform either. Since they are separate objects and should be mapped as such (see One feature, one OSM element in the wiki). Although the footway could technically be extended under them. Which I'll probably do. Personally, if the intent is to show that buses stop there, a better way to do it would be tag each bus stop as an individual highway=bus_stop node instead. That would then allow the bus stop #'s and specific bus systems (since there's like three) to be mapped individually. Where as with this way you can't really do that. You could then also add shelter=yes. Some stops, like the amtrak bus, aren't technically sheltered. So it's important not to clump the whole thing together as one homogeneous element. I had actually planned to do it that way at some point, I just haven't gotten around to it yet. 

Anyway, thanks.
Adamant1 (2020-02-23 23:17:55+00:00): Btw, arbitrarily turning things into relations just for the sake of it is generally not a good idea. Since it's a massive pain to get rid of the relation and re-map stuff if it turns out wrong. So, you might want to watch out for that and not use a "these objects look related to me. So I'll make them a relation" standard (not that I'm saying that's what you did here).