piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Baloo Uriza (2018-07-15 05:19:47+00:00): Edges of the residential area should be congruent with the landuse, I moved the edges to the visible fenceline and edge of University Boulevard's right of way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60722706
Warin61 (2018-07-16 00:43:09+00:00): Hi,
When you add a building:part .. the base of the building should carry the maximum number of levels, not just the number of levels it has it self. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
John Bek (2018-07-17 06:36:25+00:00): Ok, got it now. Apologies
Warin61 (2018-07-17 06:42:20+00:00): That is fine. Somethings like these building parts are very confusing! And then there is landuse=grass grrrr.
EmpireCityRay (2018-07-15 21:10:03+00:00): Changes do not comply with OSM standards and/or remain questionable and/or have possible vandalism and therefore does not pass quality control.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60722937
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-29 09:57:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61158822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of imaginary features in Indonesia (railways, toll roads)
PT-53 (2019-08-15 08:27:41+00:00): Hallo MartinBC,
du hast in diesem Änderungssatz diesen Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1857038884/history neu eingetragen.
Der Knoten ist "unnötig", da die Tiefgarage ja bereits in OSM eingetragen ist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35904969/history
Ich habe den "unnötigen" Knoten daher wieder gelöscht.
Grüße
Mirasolera (2018-07-17 14:21:36+00:00): Hola, porque lo eleminastes? Sabes seguro que no existe Multimotors S.R.L. ahi?
HGrance (2018-07-17 14:42:18+00:00): Hola!... Multimotors sigue ahí. Sólo dibujé las edificaciones existentes, ya que no todo el terreno está construído.
Mirasolera (2018-07-17 14:44:16+00:00): Oh, ya veo! Fue mi error. Gracias por el trabajo!
kartonage (2018-07-15 07:35:13+00:00): Hi,

if you want to create a different node for the HTK that's totally accaptable. But please don't change the existing UE node. As both universities reside in this building it also might not be good to make the UE an area. On top of that please take more care of your edits, that starts by giving a more descriptive changeset comment (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments), and including more infomation to the things you add. I have made the corresponding changes. Feel free to improve them as you see fit.

Thank you.
FrankXF (2019-04-17 20:38:05+00:00): Hallo  sdicke,

bei der Bergische Landstraßes ist keine bauliche Trennung der Straßen, damit ist eine Aufspaltung der Straße nicht angebracht. Davon abgesehen wurden keine tags wie name, ref übernommen und die Bus fahren jetzt entgegen der Einbahnstr. Muss ich wohl korrigieren.
Mfg, FrankXF
eggie (2018-07-15 04:53:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Warin61 (2018-07-15 03:33:17+00:00): Hi,
There are a number of problems... 
The driving range relation .. lets deal with the relation problem first.
A multipologon relation has an outer way or in this case outer ways. These are correct. 
However .. why are there inners or other ways in the relation? These form part of the driving range infrastructure .. they are part of the driving range operation and should not be excluded from the range? 

Next .. the golf ...
Not all of this are is a driving range .. it has the putting greens too .. so I'd call the other area a golf course, then the inner areas can be mapped as the greens and a driving range. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation#Multipolygon

Next golf_1 .. err _1 are not liked any more. For yours I'd use the tag description= to indicate what you want to say here. This has a chance of being rendered .. golf_1 has very little chance of bing rendered. 

It is normal to respond to these messages. As in .. I don't understand XXX ..
Warin61 (2018-07-15 03:37:14+00:00): Err .. tag the outer area (the relation) as a golf course  see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course - this means removing hte pitch and driving range .. and I'd remove the grass as not all of it is grass. 

Then I'd map the driving range as a separate way inside the golf course, with surface=grass.
mmmuntazim (2018-07-15 04:30:23+00:00): i tried just golf but it corrects to golf _1 automatically. could you kindly explain inner and outer ways ? i didn't see that during editing and the wiki is unclear in regards to what exactly needs to be done. and this is just a driving range with no relation to the course despite have a practice area for chipping, putting and a bunker. should i still categories them as a course?
Warin61 (2018-07-15 07:48:10+00:00): Relation - outer ways define the outer extent .. in this case of golf. 
Inners make holes .. so they are not 'golf'. 
Looking on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2081338#map=17/-37.84568/144.96342 it can be seen that the building, path and bunker are excluded from the driving range .. and that is not what you want? Look down on that page at the members. I think that you need to remove them from the relation as members - leave them on the map, but delete them as members in the relation. They are part of the infrastructure for the golf course. 

---------------------- OK? 
Then work on the tags of the relation.

The area is best tagged as a golf course - it has both a driving range and green .. while it has no golf holes you still play 'golf' there. So add tag leisure=golf_course.

Then remove the tags that should not be there. Leisure=pitch will be gone because there cannot be two leisure= different things. Surface=grass should be removed - not all the area is grass. Sorp=golf can go .. it is already in the leisure= tag. Lit=yes can go .. not all of it is lit - right out to the north? Description=driving range .. umm what about the greens?  Might want to mention them too. 
--------------
Now add a new area for the driving range, tag golf=driving_range, surface=grass, lit=yes. Starts at the building extends to the side for the bunker and then south towards the fence. 

That make sense? 

---------
Oh golf_1 ... I'd change that to a description - it is more likely to render. 
And I've probably forgotten something. :)
mmmuntazim (2018-07-15 18:04:08+00:00): i have made teh requested changes to the best of my understanding. thank you very much for havign the patience. please advice futher after the edit #60737323
Paul Berry (2018-07-16 10:27:08+00:00): Hi. I'm sure you didn't mean to, as you're an experienced mapper, but this changeset appears to have messed up a swathe of the West End of London. Could you correct it or roll back the changeset? Thanks.
MacLondon (2018-07-16 13:46:41+00:00): I've rechecked and can't find any issue with the changeset.

What I did included putting all proposed (but not open) Q2 sections into https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8448916, which is tagged with state=proposed.

The exact Q2 route in central London west of Bloomsbury hasn't been confirmed but should follow roads that are already mapped as proposed quietways.
MacLondon (2018-07-16 14:05:16+00:00): On further investigation I spotted the big error you were referring to. I have hopefully now corrected this.
Thanks
Paul Berry (2018-07-16 18:19:18+00:00): It looks like the fix has already taken effect. Thanks for correcting it.
BCNorwich (2018-11-27 08:22:17+00:00): Hi, while looking at a separate issue I noticed that Node: 5760942541 and Node: 5760942538 (highway=traffic_signals), Node: 5760942542 (cycleway=asl) are placed in buildings on Sackville Street. 

Regards Bernard
MacLondon (2018-11-27 14:57:12+00:00): Hi Bernard. I've had a look into this changeset again and have now deleted a large number of errant nodes -  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64939468. 
Regards, Mac
viloan (2018-07-15 01:54:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-07-15 04:27:38+00:00): Hello! Don't forget to add the type of the shop (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop).
Butcherbox (2018-07-15 04:34:28+00:00): Thank you, I need to follow up once im 100% sure. I dont want to put incorrect info in.
user_5359 (2018-07-15 04:17:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
user_5359 (2018-07-15 04:16:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please seethe notation of a parking lot https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking and pitch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
maxerickson (2018-10-31 08:58:45+00:00): Please keep in mind that the highway classification wiki is not comprehensive (so there will be exceptions) and that it can also just contain opinions of single individuals.

For instance, a short stretch of divided highway is probably the same classification as the highway on either side of it.

Max
Minh Nguyen (2019-02-19 20:30:12+00:00): Note that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_Road_Classification hasn’t gotten much attention from the community. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ohio/Map_features is specific to Ohio and is what most of Ohio is consistent with.
user_5359 (2018-07-15 04:45:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You delete a node with a hosue number 6124 and give the grounding building the house number 6116. If the building have different house numbers, please add the house numbers on separate nodes inside of the building.
gserafini (2018-07-16 21:09:17+00:00): 6126 is the building next door (Spoke Cyclery was incorrectly labeled in our building).
viloan (2018-07-15 04:30:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Mirasolera (2018-07-17 14:19:27+00:00): Porque eleminas tanto trabajo? En josm solo puedes selecionar todas areas que quieres y por ejemplo eleminar el tag que es incorrecto (en este ejemplo es landuse=residential y poner building=yes). Es mucho mas trabajo eleminar todo y ponerlo todo de nuevo.
viloan (2018-07-15 04:50:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
egli (2018-07-16 08:00:48+00:00): Hallo highbuilder, bist Du sicher, dass diese zwei Brunnen wirklich "Restaurant Warteck" und "Restaurant Kieser" heissen?
highbuilder (2018-07-17 04:56:30+00:00): Hallo
Laut dieser Brunnenliste der Stadt Lenzburg heissen diese Brunnen wirklich so. 
Wahrscheinlich sind es Anlehnungen an vergangene Zeiten, als da noch diese Restaurants standen. 
https://www.lenzburg.ch/de/brunnen-_content---1--3128.html
egli (2018-07-17 08:33:23+00:00): Hallo highbuilder
Das ist ja eine gute Quelle. Allerdings ist es trotzdem ein bisschen seltsame den Brunnen "Restaurant X" zu nennen. Auf der Liste steht ja "Name oder Ortsbezeichnung". Hier handelt es sich wahrscheinlich um Ortsbezeichnungen. Ich überlasse das Dir. Liebe Grüsse
EmpireCityRay (2018-07-15 20:53:18+00:00): Please provide more information like location's name, type of cuisine, optionally telephone number.
EXAMPLES
First:

    amenity=cafe
    name=Barista
    cuisine=coffee_shop

Second:

    amenity=cafe
    name=San Marco
    cuisine=italian

Third:

    amenity=cafe
    name=Eiscafé Leonardo
    cuisine=ice_cream
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60724953
EmpireCityRay (2018-07-15 20:48:56+00:00): Add if there's a parking fee fee=yes fee=no fee=<interval>
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60725069
bkircher (2018-07-15 07:05:42+00:00): Sorry, commit message is totally wrong here.

Correct one would be: Add new Recycling container
dikkeknodel (2018-07-16 13:18:36+00:00): Hallo Heinz,
Wenn du schreibst "So heisst der Gipfel gemäss der offiziellen Karte der Landestopographie" dann hört es sich an das der Name kopiert ist vom Karte der Landestopographie. Dass ist aber nicht erlaubt, weil es die Urheberrechte der Landestopograpfie verletzt. Sehe auch hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Datasources#Not-compatible_data_sources
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
Heinz_Stöffler (2018-07-16 14:50:56+00:00): Urheberrecht?
Nein, «so heisst der Gipfel» einfach!
Schau mal, hoffentlich funktioniert der Link?:
https://map.geo.admin.ch/?lang=de&topic=ech&bgLayer=ch.swisstopo.pixelkarte-farbe&layers=ch.swisstopo.zeitreihen,ch.bfs.gebaeude_wohnungs_register,ch.bav.haltestellen-oev,ch.swisstopo.swisstlm3d-wanderwege&layers_visibility=false,false,false,false&layers_timestamp=18641231,,,&E=2603598&N=1233516&zoom=8.979291441869966&crosshair=marker
dikkeknodel (2018-07-17 08:11:23+00:00): Hallo Heinz,
Ich versuche es zu erklären :-).
Natürlich hat die Landestopografie kein Urheberrecht auf einem Name der lokal benützt wird, sie haben jedoch Urheberrecht auf die Daten ihrer Karten. 
So es ist nicht erlaubt wenn du die Daten (Name und Höhe) der Landestopografiekarten direkt kopierst. 
Wenn du lokale Kenntnisse hast dass der Gipfel so heisst und so hoch ist (z.B. wenn es dort ein Schilt gibt mit Name und Höhe) und mit gps kontrolliert hast wo der Gipfel genau ist dann ist es erlaubt diese Daten einzutragen. 
Der Unterschied ist also nicht immer genau zu machen, aber es ist klar das direkt kopieren von Karten der Landestopografie nicht erlaubt ist. 
Wenn du schreibst "So heisst der Gipfel gemäss der offiziellen Karte der Landestopographie" dann hört sich dass an als kopieren, daher meine Frage. 
Wenn es deine lokale Kenntnisse sind die du einträgst bei OpenStreetMap ist es klarer wenn du schreibst das du das einträgst auf Basis deiner lokalen Kenntnisse und nicht die Karte der Landestopografie nennst. 
Ist es so eindeutiger was ich meine?
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
Heinz_Stöffler (2018-07-17 16:32:06+00:00): Hallo dikkeknodel,
Ganz herzlichen Dank für deine Ausführungen; so ist mir das nun auch klar!
übrigens:
Bei «openstreetmap.org» habe ich mich angemeldet, weil ich die APP «PeakFinder» verwende, welche diese Daten als Bezugsquelle verwendet!
Grad heute bin ich wieder den schönen Weg vom Weissenstein, über die Hasenmatt zur Stallflue und weiter über die Küferegg und weiter zur Wandflue bis Untergrenchenberg gewandert und habe dabei wieder botanische Neuigkeiten für mich entdeckt.
Ich werde das Geschehen nun mal mehr aus dem Hintergrund beobachten und so mehr Erfahrungen sammeln ...

HERZLICHEN DANK für deinen Support; das war sehr lieb!
Heinz :-)
dikkeknodel (2018-07-18 06:40:28+00:00): Hallo Heinz,
Ich mach dass gern. Wenn du spezifisch kartierst als Nutzer von PeakFinder, ist est vielleicht auch wichtig diese Seite zu lesen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
Heinz_Stöffler (2018-07-19 06:06:42+00:00): Ganz ganz herzlichen Dank
Klar, das mach ich, um mehr darüber zu wissen
Heinz :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-29 09:57:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61158822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a series of imaginary features in Indonesia (railways, toll roads)
pitscheplatsch (2018-07-15 14:10:50+00:00): #vandalism ?

Could this area/changeset checked by a local contributor? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60726414
gerhard81 (2018-07-18 05:34:39+00:00): Seems like vandalism as existing houses and addresses have been removed. I suggest a revert (for #60726439 too)
Tomas Straupis (2018-07-15 08:02:16+00:00): Duplicate. Reverted.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-26 18:31:47+00:00): What you meant by English name set to "with friends from Latvia"?

Is it a private or actual name of this campsite?
highflyer74 (2018-07-17 10:45:18+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen. In diesem Fall fehlte bei der Feuerwehr das Hauptattribut, welches ich jetzt hinzugefügt habe. Auch wichtig: verwende name=* nur für Eigennamen. Der Spielplatz hat die Eigenschaft eines Spielplatzes (was durch leisure=playground ausgedrückt wird), aber nicht den Eigennamen. Deshalb lassen wir name=* in diesem Fall weg. Schau Dir dazu mal den Wiki Artikel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names an. Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Alecs01 (2018-07-15 11:31:28+00:00): Already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1688847355
pyrog (2019-03-03 16:56:24+00:00): Osmose râle car tu utilises addr:housenumber sans utiliser soit addr:street, soit une relation associatedStreet
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60726993
pyrog (2019-03-03 16:57:51+00:00): Osmose râle car tu utilises addr:housenumber sans addr:street ou sans relation associatedStreet
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60726993
lmagreault (2019-03-05 13:11:10+00:00): Merci StreetComplete ! Je traiterai en même temps que les doublons d'adresse.
pyrog (2019-03-05 15:05:27+00:00): StreetComplete ne rajoute que le n° du bâtiment, et ne fait pas le lien avec la rue.

Tu peux rajouter une issue et/ou discuter de son intérêt pour la France sur la liste OSM (cette quête est désactivée dans l'autres pays).

https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/tree/master/app/src/main/java/de/westnordost/streetcomplete/quests/housenumber
highflyer74 (2018-07-17 10:46:37+00:00): Nochmal ich :-)

Da wir bei OSM lediglich permanente Objekte erfassen, habe ich den Punkt wieder entfernt. Bitte nicht böse sein...
Nakaner-repair (2018-07-15 08:39:12+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 60705382, 60705515, 60716634.
abakus_uploader (2018-07-15 22:32:10+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
bxl-forever (2018-12-31 14:18:17+00:00): Sorry but this stop was already on the map.  You are creating a duplicate here.  Deleting.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:43:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:38:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60917044 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:22:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].