piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2018-02-13 21:51:41+00:00): Tip: Vink bij uploaden het hokje aan met de tekst .. : “Ik zou graag hebben dat iemand mijn bewerkingen nakijkt”
Je bedoelingen zullen ongetwijfeld goed zijn, maar dit is geen beginnerswerk.
eggie (2018-02-13 21:57:59+00:00): Wanneer je wegen gedeeltelijk voor geopend verklaard zal het zo niet gaan routeren. Wat is precies je bedoeling?  Graag reactie
jaap de vries (2018-02-14 06:57:48+00:00): Oprit is geasfalteerd maar de andere stukken nog niet. M.i. niet verstandig om dit al op de kaart te zetten, pas als al een gedeelte open is, bv  Varsseveld - Groenlo dit dan op de kaart zetten met de juiste benoeming (tags)..
eggie (2018-02-14 08:32:37+00:00): rkoebrugge  zie ook dit draadje https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=684968#p684968
jaap de vries (2018-02-14 07:02:18+00:00): De zandafgraving is nog open, actief dus.  http://www.roelofszandwinning.nl/locaties/rutbekerveld 
Dus je opmerking van " Zandafgraving afgesloten " is onjuist.
Graag een reactie retour.
rkoebrugge (2018-02-14 07:13:06+00:00): Jaap, de zandafgraving is aan deze zijde gesloten. De opening is aan de andere zijde gemaakt bij de Rutbekerveldweg. De opening is nog niet getekend, ik zal kijken of ik daar een aanpassing voor kan doen op basis van GPS logging.
Andre68 (2018-02-13 23:12:27+00:00): Ich habe leider die Erfahrung gemacht, dass auch "amtliche" Koordinaten nicht immer richtig sind. Hier habe ich die Änderungen durchgeführt, weil beim Spaziergang durch den Ort vieles deutlich deplatzliert war. Natürlich kann auch mal mein GPS spinnen, aber die Erfahrung lehrt mich, dass bei einem deutlichen Sprung (mehr als 5 Meter) etwas nicht stimmt. Insbesondere, wenn ich keine Gebäude den Empfang stören. Ich komme aber so schnell nicht wieder nach Ritschweier und kann daher auch keine Mittelung der Koordinaten durchführen. Ich vertraue jetzt erstmal darauf, dass deine Korrekturen richtig sind, behalte es mir aber vor, beim nächsten Besuch diese zu überprüfen.
whb (2018-02-14 11:20:35+00:00): Gemittelte Daten bekommt wir sehr schön von Strava.
Besonders an Kreuzungen an denen viele Aufzeichnungen vorliegen, lässt sich der Versatz sehr gut bestimmen, wie z.B. hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=49.51842&mlon=8.70823#map=19/49.51842/8.70823
oder hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=49.51994&mlon=8.70238#map=19/49.51994/8.70238
Dort sieht man, dass DG zu Maps4BW (Gebäude) in etwa den gleichen Versatz hat, wie DG zu Strava.
Strava bestätigt hier also die Lagegenauigkeit von Maps4BW (Gebäude).
Bei Maps4BW gibt es immer mal wieder veraltete Daten (z.B. Haus wurde abgerissen und durch Neubau an anderer Position ersetzt und Maps4BW hat das noch nicht berücksichtigt) oder einzelne Ausreißer (besonders bei sehr alten Gebäuden ist mir das aufgefallen).
Aber systematische Fehler habe ich bei Maps4BW (Gebäude) noch nie gefunden.
Straßen und Wege liegen bei Maps4BW allerdings oft daneben, das kann daran liegen, dass diese manchmal auch nur per Hand von Luftbildern oder alten Karten abgezeichnet wurden (insbesondere bei Waldwegen) oder evtl. die Mitte des Straßengrundstückes genommen wurde, die Straße aber nicht mittig auf diesem gebaut wurde.
In Baden-Württemberg werden die Gebäude vor Ort eingemessen (durch Untere Vermessungsbehörde oder einen Öffentlich bestellten Vermessungsingenieur).
Deswegen sind diese Gebäudedaten üblicherweise bis auf wenige Zentimeter genau.
user_5359 (2018-02-15 06:00:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5410971426
viloan (2018-02-13 21:56:43+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-02-19 16:35:19+00:00): Suas edições foram revertidas pois você colocou coisas que não existem e também cometeu muitos erros.
Anton Khorev (2018-02-14 23:51:06+00:00): I don't see how your geometry of Bolshaya Konyushennaya st. is more correct.

I hope you are not trying to align the roads with the buildings that are currently in osm data. The roads were mapped using gps tracks, the buildings weren't and are often misaligned.

The street was drawn as a straight line, but now it's not. The building to the East of the street near Konyushennaya sq. is at a slight angle. If you want to take that into account, you'd move the northern end of the street for about a half of the distance you actually moved it in this changeset.
brittster (2018-02-16 17:40:49+00:00): I was using Strava to align a few features around the city, and wasn’t using buildings. I reverted the changeset because I see your point about how it was straight before and now it is not.
user_5359 (2018-02-15 05:58:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/597068161/history. Is this really the right place?
cwholemanii (2018-02-15 06:30:47+00:00): I have no idea what 597068161, v3 is. The other five look good.
user_5359 (2018-02-15 05:59:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5410971426
user_5359 (2018-02-15 06:01:45+00:00): Sorry right comment to wrong changeset :)
Reksyy (2018-02-16 19:17:03+00:00): its ok.
totera (2018-02-16 00:56:28+00:00): La relazione 8019003 è la relazione senza membri che ti è stata segnalata come errore
user_5359 (2018-02-18 19:48:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards /debit_cards.
abakus_uploader (2018-02-14 23:32:18+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Constable (2018-02-17 09:25:07+00:00): here a connection node is missing, the road is not connected to the footway crossing it https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561116133
make sure you connect them and please reply to my messages
freebeer (2018-02-19 15:42:12+00:00): Hallo,
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=56337645
is a good overview of this changeset, which is unhelpfully labelled as `Corrections'.  I came across this when looking to see what had been deleted from this general area.
In particular, I want to draw your attention to Hales 3, 5, 4, and 6.  These were previously drawn as two pairs of connected buildings as a multipolygon with the open central courtyard in each dorm cut out.
You deleted both of these, to draw four new solid building areas, based on the Bing imagery as stated well above, but that imagery implies the multipolygon cutouts were correct, unless you know they have been rebuilt as a solid building, which would be a pity.
Presumably the structures visible between the dorms are just covered walkways, and not actual buildings in themselves, in which case that part of the multipolygon could have been separated and turned into building=roof.
Also, Hales 7 through 10 you have changed from being rectangular shaped into some un-right-angled outline, which looks poor, does not match the imagery -- I still see right angles, plus a missing courtyard, and more detail not mapped here.  Also, the satellite imageries tend to give a distortion to objects that are seen to be properly angled in true aerial overflight imageries, the latter unfortunately not available within OSM for this area.
Further, to the east of here you have again deleted two buildings only to redraw them again, like with Hale 3 through 6.  In general, we try not to do that as it loses the object history, and this timeline of  contributions by fellow mapper Jothirnadh or the original multipolygon mapper ikiya -- not to mention the footpaths from Constable you deleted only to redraw later (that original work can also be restored even after deletion, if you decide it was done in error).
demon_box (2018-02-14 20:12:13+00:00): ciao Benvenuto ;-) perchè hai cambiato da highway=track ad highway=path la sterrata intorno al lago FIPS? la conosco bene e non è un sentiero e perciò la rimetto come era.
grazie
chachafish (2018-02-18 16:08:22+00:00): Hello, and thank you for your additions to openstreetmap. I noticed you added quite a few sidewalks south of 6th Avenue. Please keep in mind that anytime two "ways" intercept, such as a sidewalk and a street, that they have to be joined with a node. Quite a few of your sidewalks cross streets and other sidewalks, but they are not joined with nodes. You can read more here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways
Tony Neumann (2018-02-19 21:23:04+00:00): Thanks for letting me know.  I think I've fixed most of it now.
dooley (2018-02-15 11:32:47+00:00): Hallo Bananensaft.

Kannst du bitte nochmal checken, ob die von dir angelegten Adressen mit addr:city Crailsheim und addr:suburb Oberspeltach korrekt sind? In OSM und in Wikipedia gehört Oberspeltach zu Frankenhardt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/390791
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/de:Frankenhardt?uselang=de#Gemeindegliederung

Oder hat sich da administrativ etwas geändert?

Danke.
Bananensaft (2018-02-15 13:49:54+00:00): Hallo dooley,
du hast natürlich vollkommen Recht.
Habe mich da unpraktischer Weise bei einer flotten Nominatim Anfrage verlesen (nur Verwaltungsverband Crailsheim gelesen - Rest überflogen).
Wurde nun korrigiert!
Danke für den Hinweis.
Liebe Grüße
user_5359 (2018-02-15 17:37:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check your house number! If you need help: You are welcome!
Myazyk (2019-04-06 21:05:01+00:00): Що то за двір ферми на Самбірській поруч з будинками?
olehz (2019-04-07 10:26:09+00:00): таке от село: між багатоповерховками там городи з бульбою колись були. зараз не знаю
Myazyk (2019-04-09 20:44:40+00:00): Біля багатьох будинків у місті є городи з бульбою, навіть на вул. Грушевського, але то не означає, що всюди там тре вказувати, що то ферми. 
Думаю, у таких випадках навіть не варто вказувати, що то landuse=farmland, не то щоб farmyard
olehz (2019-04-09 21:17:47+00:00): Так це не приватний двір, а маленьке коликтивне "поле" на кілька квартир. Можна вивести людину з села, але село з людини ні ) Я таких піздєців більше ніде не бачив в світі (хіба в наших смт) - цікаво мати такі дані хоча б для аналізу використання землі у рідному місті
Myazyk (2019-04-10 08:53:32+00:00): от і я про те, що то не колгосп, не ферма, а всього лиш грядки. А ти позначаєш, що то ферма там.
У світі ти не бачив, бо у цивілізованих країнах вирощуванням продукції займаються ферми, підприємства і людина приходить додому відпочити. А у нас, щоб більше заощадити і мати свою органічну продукцію, вдаються до такої праці
olehz (2019-04-10 09:22:01+00:00): ну і як ти пропонуєш ті грядки позначати?
Myazyk (2019-04-10 12:19:12+00:00): Пропоную взагалі їх не позначати.
Є житлова зона тай все
olehz (2019-04-10 13:25:20+00:00): я проти - мені така інфа важлива. якщо приватне подвір'я - ок, але тут мова про використання комунальної землі (в футбол діти там не пограють). ну і не дарма на вартість квартири впливає оточуючий пейзаж (трава і дерева чи асфальт і городи)
Myazyk (2019-04-10 15:04:09+00:00): Ну тоді і клумби з квітами тре позначати, і дерева всі
olehz (2019-04-10 15:43:07+00:00): а ніхто і не боронить. я їх особисто не помічав, бо вони по площі маленькі, не сильно більші за похибку GPS
Myazyk (2019-04-10 19:30:34+00:00): По вулиці Грушевського можу сказати, що поміж будинками грядок з квітами приблизно стільки ж як і грядок з бульбою, але я не вважаю, що то доцільно наносити на карту
user_5359 (2018-02-15 05:53:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.
abakus_uploader (2018-02-14 23:32:19+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
viloan (2018-02-14 00:29:11+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-02-14 05:57:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please? If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead or let the key empty.
5m4u9 (2018-02-14 14:33:39+00:00): JJ, tengo duda cómo mapear mejor los caminos dentro torrenteras y ríos urbanos? tracks? ...
//
pienso que varios accesos deberían ir como tracks por lo dificil que puede resultar a un auto normal usar estos caminos improvisados, pero no solo la parte del río sino desde el ingreso a la parte de la torrentera
//
la repercusión sería que no les envie por aquí el ruteador a gente que no sabe a donde se mete, sino a quien quiere explorar...
//
claro, existe excepciones y esas como calle normal...
JJIglesias (2018-02-15 01:16:12+00:00): Por principio un camino que cruza una Torrentera DEJA de ser camino a menos que haya sido preparado para dichas circunstancias, como es el caso de zonas donde pasa agua y han sido o pavimentadas con piedras o concreto; en el caso de Tiquipaya NO es TAL; los caminos dejan de ser roads y pasan a Tracks, puede que puedas cruzar y puede que NO, los Navegadores de OSM y Garmin que he probado NO hacen Diferencia; solo que NO AVISAN sino hasta llegar al "area" o 'Nodo" del Vadeo.

Cuando elimine todos los "Fords" intermitentes que puso "allroads" varias partes pasaron a ser Tracks y NO roads, pues "formalmente" NO hay un camino en el lecho del rio, lo pasas a tu propio riesgo y no necesariamente siguiendo una "ruta" porque simplemente, te adaptas a lo que te encuentres...
JJIglesias (2018-02-15 01:20:30+00:00): el mapa SOLO te dira con fiabilidad, donde empieza y donde termina el "road" seco, al ser un track no es fiable, es solo referencial; obviamente si NO conectamos ambas partes "secas" pues el navegador Jamas te ruteara por alli, lo cual significaria que NO podrias navegar 1/2 Bolivia, jejejeje que tiene miles de caminos y sendas en areas que cruzan o discurren en lechos de rios
JJIglesias (2018-02-15 01:37:20+00:00): Tapacari es un claro ejemplo, todos sus accesos SUR deben pasar por lechos de rio, si o si, formalmente NO hay un camino, aunque este trazado, pasas a tu riesgo y por donde puedas; curiosamente en las montañas del PN Tunari, si hay muchos vados que estan Pavimentados en piedra o concreto, para garantizar la continuidad y permanencia de la via...
chachafish (2018-02-28 09:56:00+00:00): Greetings and thank you for your additions to openstreetmap. I noticed you created a line that pretty much follows along Longmont's administrative boundary. The line is untagged, that is, it has no tags that describe what it is or what its purpose is. Is this line serving a purpose? Thanks :)
sirpenguin (2018-02-28 18:04:24+00:00): To be honest, I can't recall what it was there for. I think I meant to delete it but it slipped my mind. I think the administrative boundary is a little skewed around town also. Not sure how to go about finding the proper sorcery for it.
Matthew Darwin (2018-02-14 14:56:25+00:00): Hi Danny,

The city seems to use the address "54 Clenning St" instead of "54-18 Clenning St".  Same for the other addresses on this street.
DannyMcD (2018-02-15 00:13:10+00:00): Hi Matthew,
An address on Clenning Street makes more sense.  I've corrected the addresses.  What is your source, by the way? GeoOttawa shows the units as part of 16 Kilbarron.
Matthew Darwin (2018-02-16 00:43:31+00:00): Hi Danny,

I'm using the address.csv file from the city. http://data.ottawa.ca/dataset/addresspoints

I am inferring the location from what you edited and the list of available addresses in the file.  ie, I am assuming (other than adding units) that there should not be invented addresses that are not in the city data set.

I turned the csv file into a JOSM-compatible GeoJSON file so I can easily add addresses into OSM using "Merge Layer" function.  Let me know if you want a copy.  The file is updated daily.
DannyMcD (2018-02-16 05:29:49+00:00): Hi Matthew,
I somehow missed the address file in the Ottawa Open Data portal, since it is not in the geography&maps group.  Thanks for pointing that out.  I agree that the addresses should be on Clenning.
Matthew Darwin (2018-02-16 05:33:11+00:00): I'm glad I could help.  BTW, I also have computed the delta between OSM and the city's address file so I have a GeoJSON that just has the missing addresses.  Let me know if you would like it as well.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-03-06 16:53:04+00:00): POKEMON nomes, verificar este changeset.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-03-06 16:54:38+00:00): Por favor Caio, retire os dados falsos que você inseriu aqui.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-03-06 17:01:43+00:00): Caio, eu removi os dados que você colocou, pois muitos estavam com nomes informais. O OpenStreetMap é um mapa usado em outros lugares, não somente no Pokemon. Então você deve ter isso em mente quando for editar.
5m4u9 (2018-02-14 15:15:15+00:00): siempre siempre ortogonalizar si los edificiones son geométricos rectangulares.
//
creo es la tecla S en Id Editor
Caleidoscopic (2018-02-14 18:00:57+00:00): Correcto,es la S, se me debió pasar alguno,disculpas y gracias
dgitto (2018-02-27 17:08:54+00:00): Ciao, potresti per favore controllare il tuo edit di Santa Marherita Marina?
è stato segnalato che hai (IMHO giustamente) devalorizzato i landuse per passare i tag su nodo, però sembra che questo place risulti adesso del tutto cancellato.
Si tratta di 
https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fit.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSanta_Margherita_Marina&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGWQforODxFHq3LeUNGQ6Z0-umLpg
dgitto (2018-02-27 17:09:21+00:00): https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Margherita_Marina
fayor (2018-02-27 19:20:50+00:00): Hai perfettamente ragione! Ho rimediato.
Grazie.
dgitto (2018-02-27 21:22:46+00:00): grazie a te
pippinu (2018-11-10 15:46:57+00:00): In questo, ed altri changeset nel comune di Messina, hai cancellato tutte le informazioni sulla svolta nelle corsie. Sono informazioni molto utili per i navigatori, ed inserirle è un lavoro noioso e delicato, che ha richiesto diverse ore. Ti chiedo di stare più attento a ciò che cancelli, e in particolare a non cancellare più dati inseriti dagli altri senza prima chiedere conferma a chi quei dati li ha inseriti.
viloan (2018-02-14 01:16:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kommuri (2019-04-02 06:09:03+00:00): "Hi Akrimullah,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way 458647675 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems there is no existence of road.
Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
user_5359 (2018-02-14 05:54:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
user_5359 (2018-02-14 05:57:01+00:00): I see the second node: Which house number (3 or 3851) are correct?
smunoz47 (2018-02-14 18:52:18+00:00): The house number for this address should be 3851 Harbour Island Lane
user_5359 (2018-02-14 20:05:38+00:00): I have merge the information: Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5411289044
Robot8A (2018-02-14 09:05:25+00:00): No puedo estar al tanto de todas las ediciones que se hacen en la ciudad, ni de si todas se hacen bien. Si detecto errores suelo revertirlos o intentar cambiarlos, aunque a veces es difícil decidir porque hay elementos dudosos que según para qué personas pueden ser correctos o no. En cambio tus ediciones se centran simplemente en borrar el área de Santa Isabel, lo cual es incorrecto ya que es un barrio residencial. No estás contribuyendo a OSM, sino eliminando el trabajo de otras personas y eso es algo que no se puede consentir.