piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2020-09-30 22:31:15+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-27 10:04:18+00:00): note: your image link is broken

which image you wanted to link?
_PG_ (2020-10-27 16:01:09+00:00): Является ли веломаршрут имеющим официальную выполненную властями разметку, или это просто предлагаемый маршрут для покатушек? Если он размечен властями, то это сенсационное событие общегосударственного масштаба, не имеющее аналогов в истории России. Если он не размечен, его (увы) нельзя рисовать как существующий веломаршрут и нужно тэгировать как планируемый (вместо route=bicycle необходимо поставить тэг proposed:route=bicycle) в соответствии с предписаниями в вики:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
Разумеется, на карте waymarked cyclng trails ("маркированные веломаршруты") маршрут отображаться перестанет.
https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=11696219&map=7.413925450941745!54.7924!58.8205

Прошу внести данные исправления самостоятельно, т.к., как я понял, вы знакомы с состоянием дел на местности лично.
Uralla (2020-10-27 16:34:22+00:00): Фиксед!
_PG_ (2020-10-27 17:11:07+00:00): Спасибо.
Puxan (2020-10-14 16:32:09+00:00): Por favor, procura ajustar más el dibujo a la imagen. En este mapeado hay edificios que no se corresponden con la realidad.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91778882
Warin61 (2021-12-13 05:02:07+00:00): This change set changed the named "South Island' tagged as an island later an islet that applied to both the tree area and the sand area 

to 

being only the sand area. This is not correct. 

I have made a new relation for the sand area ... natural=beach, surface=sand .... And then restored the island/islet to be the whole tree area and sand area. 

Similar has been done for the other Cocoss Islands... If you have done similar elsewhere would you please correct those?
literan (2020-09-30 19:36:56+00:00): why did you deleted tags from multipolygon? Make, if you need, type=building relation, but do not delete existing objects. Reverting.
Jeff Underwood (2020-09-30 20:26:37+00:00): Hi Literan,

This relation captures connected building sections which multipolygons are not really designed to do as they don't work with the normal inner and outer roles. Building relations function similar to multipolygons but work to model these situations better. A building relation will look very similar on Mapnik, but it helps renders understand how to use these extra pieces of the relation properly, whether for 2D or 3D mapping.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building

If you feel that it is best to leave it as a multipolygon, that is fine, but this was the reason for the change.

-Jeff
alexey_zakharenkov (2020-09-30 22:23:15+00:00): Jeff Underwood,
no, building relation is not similar to multipolygon relation, neither it's a replacement for the latter. Mechanical replacement of type=multipolygon tag with type=building and 'outer' member roles with 'part' almost never gives you a correct building relation. I hope you carefully read Relation:building and Relation:multipolygon OSM wiki articles before further work on complex buildings.

-Alexey
Jeff Underwood (2020-09-30 23:43:59+00:00): Hi Alexey,

I see your solution was to simplify the relation and break the interior pieces into smaller school relations. Is that how you would recommend resolving similar malformed multipolygons while retaining the intent of the creator?

-Jeff
alexey_zakharenkov (2020-10-01 07:00:41+00:00): That relation was a pile of ways not conforming the definition of a valid multipolygon. Look "Valid Multipolygon conditions" section of the Relation:multipolygon wiki article, in particular "Graphical examples of OGC validity" link.
A building relation should contain several parts and an outline each of which is an area (closed way or multipolygon), while a multipolygon often contains members that are unclosed ways. 
Thus, the idea of converting "outer" role to "part" role of any (valid or invalid) multipolygon to make a building relation from multipolygon relation is  initially incorrect.
Hb- (2020-10-30 23:56:16+00:00): Hi, deleting the way 852143832 was wrong. The exklave Karki is not limited to the residential area. It contains the meadows & farmland around the village too.
Hb- (2020-10-31 06:25:13+00:00): The wrongly deleted way is restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93323151
Tri_Hugger (2020-09-30 16:53:26+00:00): Correction: Intersection edited is on ulitsa 40 let Oktyabrya in Тепличный.
Puxan (2020-10-02 18:40:45+00:00): @[Vito Zanchi]          
buen trabajo. Vigila que te ha salido un cruce en un edificio (en OSM cruce significa paso de peatones).    Muy bien, sigue mapeando.                    
Joaquim
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91780794
user_5359 (2020-10-01 03:34:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
DD1GJ (2020-09-30 19:23:05+00:00): Löschung erneut rückgängig gemacht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88524699

Der Weg ist als privat gekennzeichnet und entspricht dem auf allen aktuellen Luftbildern sichtbaren Zustand.

1968 ging die die Wiechertstraße aus östlicher Richtung nur bis Haus 12. Das jetzige Haus 10 war für Fahrzeuge damals nur über diesen Weg zu erreichen, so dass da für den Eigentümer wahrscheinlich noch ein altes Wegerecht besteht. Sollte der Weg irgendwann renaturiert oder durch einen Zaun abgesperrt werden, dann kannst Du es gerne der Realität anpassen.
fzweuifwoefw (2020-09-30 19:36:54+00:00): Es besteht kein Wegerecht und der Weg ist renaturiert. Das sind Hofeinfahrten und ein Gartenweg wie es viele andere Häuser auch haben. Warum wird dieser eingezeichnet?
DD1GJ (2020-09-30 22:02:46+00:00): Weil der Weg deutlichst sogar auf dem maximal 2 Jahre alten amtlichen Luftbild sichtbar ist. An der Flurstücksgrenzen sind keinerlei Befriedungen zu erkennen.

Es kann natürlich sein, dass sich in den letzten Jahren der Zustand verändert hat. Ich habe daher die Zufahrten angepasst und das Zwischenstück auf renaturiert gesetzt, so dass es nicht mehr auf den Karten angezeigt werden Wird. Auf der Hauptkarte ist der angepasste Zustand bereits sichtbar, auf anderen Karten kann es ein paar Tage oder Wochen dauern.

Immer mehr Rettungsdienste und Leitstellen verwenden OSM-Karten zur Einsatzplanung. Daher sind eingezeichnete Zufahrtswege zu zurückliegenden Häusern wichtig.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-16 10:40:00+00:00): لماذا قمتم بحذف العناصر التالية:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12rJ
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 08:07:50+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=seafood;1
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7960686039/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=seafood
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
ff5722 (2024-01-30 09:30:47+00:00): Thanks, I've fixed it
NM$L (2020-10-01 15:13:25+00:00): ？
FreedSky (2020-10-01 15:34:51+00:00): 不同的国家多争议的确的主张范围是有所区别的，请不要删除这些边界。
同时因为钓鱼岛区域处于无人岛屿，请不要显示出任何行政边界归属，避免来回的编辑战。
FreedSky (2020-10-01 15:39:28+00:00): 本次退回操作：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91835199
FreedSky (2020-10-01 15:51:23+00:00): Phạm vi khiếu nại ở các khu vực tranh chấp ở các quốc gia khác nhau là khác nhau. Vui lòng không xóa các ranh giới này.
Đồng thời, vì khu vực quần đảo Điếu Ngư là đảo hoang, vui lòng không hiển thị bất kỳ ranh giới hành chính nào để tránh các cuộc chiến tranh biên tập qua lại.
FreedSky (2020-10-01 15:34:48+00:00): 不同的国家多争议的确的主张范围是有所区别的，请不要删除这些边界。
同时因为钓鱼岛区域处于无人岛屿，请不要显示出任何行政边界归属，避免来回的编辑战。
FreedSky (2020-10-01 15:39:26+00:00): 本次退回操作：https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91835199
FreedSky (2020-10-01 15:51:09+00:00): Phạm vi khiếu nại ở các khu vực tranh chấp ở các quốc gia khác nhau là khác nhau. Vui lòng không xóa các ranh giới này.
Đồng thời, vì khu vực quần đảo Điếu Ngư là đảo hoang, vui lòng không hiển thị bất kỳ ranh giới hành chính nào để tránh các cuộc chiến tranh biên tập qua lại.
liuchengjt (2020-10-04 15:59:47+00:00): OK
whb (2020-10-02 08:18:42+00:00): Guten Tag,

warum wurde die Hausnummer 5 hier nochmals eingetragen, obwohl hier schon erfasst?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2599144997
Puxan (2020-10-01 17:44:54+00:00): Cuando una vía se cruza con otra hay que poner un punto en la que cruza para que tengan un nodo comun a ambas. Las vías solo deben unirse a otras vías o a ríos, no a edificios. No olvides escuadrar los edificios.      
Muy bien, sigue mapeando
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91783703
Puxan (2020-10-01 17:42:24+00:00): Buen trabajo, pero despues de dibujar cada edificio hay que escuadrarlo.     
Muy bien, sigue mapeando
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91784018
mavl (2020-10-01 16:30:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет тропу, которая идёт сквозь стену дома. Как такое может быть?  
  
Эта тропа  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853502174  
  
проходит сквозь стену этого дома  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/712898446
mavl (2020-10-01 16:38:43+00:00): Также этот пакет правок добавляет населённый пункт Борки. В Ишимском районе нет такого населённого пункта. Напишите, пожалуйста, что вы хотели обозначить?  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657795839/history
Puxan (2020-10-01 17:41:05+00:00): Tenemos una vía que no está conectada a nada, Los edificios deben ajustarse más a la imagen y escuadrarse. Hay que individualizar los edificios que están muy juntos.              
Muy bien, Sigue mapeando
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91784689
angys (2020-10-23 13:33:40+00:00): Hello can you update and traces the latest highways geometry of both construction and completed around twentyfive.7 , Kuala Langat?
TommyLanez (2020-10-26 16:33:02+00:00): Thanks for the suggestion!
Map-Peter (2021-11-03 21:44:47+00:00): Hallo !i!,
 
kannst du hier ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2471408 ) weiter helfen und den Kartenfehlerpunkt danach schließen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7960921956/history
 
Danke im Voraus
 
Gruß Peter
Myazyk (2020-11-07 19:20:27+00:00): А чому Зелена вулиця йде мостом?
kira_bis (2020-11-10 16:44:30+00:00): Вулиця Зелена  не має ніякого мосту або я вас не розую
Myazyk (2020-11-19 19:28:59+00:00): Ну Ви ж були дадали цій вулиці теґи bridge=yes та layer=1.
Бачу, що вже видали, разом із назвами російською та польською мовами
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-30 08:08:13+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=chinese;1
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7960920023/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=chinese
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
EdLoach (2020-09-30 19:24:07+00:00): Found it (from the days before changesets, so this might not be numerically my lowest numbered changeset, but this is what I remember doing first, days before my GPS device arrived). https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/161389
EdLoach (2020-09-30 19:32:53+00:00): Found an earlier one. These were in the days when I hadn't realised you had to update the name on every section of road separately. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131741 (also changes to the default map layer only got re-rendered weekly)
EdLoach (2020-09-30 19:35:19+00:00): My lowest numbered changeset was about four months later https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9129 by which time I'd done lots of GPS tracing and mapping of Clacton.
EdLoach (2020-09-30 19:36:52+00:00): I should have checked https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?EdLoach first as that finds my first changeset 131741 as above much quicker than I did
EdLoach (2020-09-30 19:37:54+00:00): I've just realised I've probably increased my discussed changeset count on the hdyc page by talking to myself here.
jambamkin (2020-10-01 20:07:33+00:00): Just bumped into this self comment stream of consciousness, really enjoyed it, thanks for all your contribution all this time.
eggie (2020-10-16 17:11:44+00:00): Nu edits in Nederland.. daarom
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
km2bp (2020-10-01 20:38:21+00:00): Witaj na OSM.  
Taki rów który rysujesz https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853514335#map=15/52.0386/15.3519 powinien w miejscach w  przecięcia się z drogą   być tunelem tylko  pod drogą. Zbierasz już ślady GPS niezbędne przy mapowaniu  w naszym gęsto zalesionym województwie?  Jeśli nie  a chcesz być dokładny to aplikacja OSMtracker jest najlepsza  zwłaszcza do mapowania szlaków turystycznych i dróg leśnych wszędzie tam  gdzie na zdjęciach lotniczych nic nie widać. Pozdrawiam.
dj_bortas (2020-10-01 20:45:51+00:00): Dziękuję za sugestię z tunelami. Oczywiście zanim wrysuję jakąś drogę, której nie widać na zdjęciach satelitarnych, lub oznaczam szlaki najpierw sprawdzam wszystko w terenie i zapisuję ślady.
km2bp (2020-10-01 20:54:13+00:00): A czym zbierasz ? Ja przetestowałem wiele aplikacji w tym OSMand Wszystkie zbierają ślad zbyt niedokładnie .  Ta którą ci poleciłem jest  najdokładniejsza.   W moim profilu na OSM znajdziesz kilka przydatnych  porad. Fajnie że się w to zaangażowałeś.  
Zaglądaj też na polskie forum OSM https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68351
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2020-12-29 20:09:57+00:00): لماذا تم حذف الفيضة ؟
jcr83 (2020-09-30 20:08:00+00:00): Bonjour,
SVP ne pas mettre l'altitude dans le champ "name", il y a le champ "ele" pour cela.
Myazyk (2020-11-07 19:18:57+00:00): А шо це за такий дивний міст для ґрунтової дороги?
kira_bis (2020-11-10 16:39:40+00:00): Я не знаю як правильно пояснити, але постараюсь. Я точно пам'ятаю, що там йде дорога, яку собі зробили люди, які живуть за потічком Бабинка. Ця дорога точно не асфальтована і шутром не засипана. Я не впевнена чи слід було почначити її другурядною чи польовою.  Мені здається міст металевий і тільки одна машина зможе по ньому проїхати за раз.
Myazyk (2020-11-19 19:21:06+00:00): Я там не бував і тому не можу оцінити чи це ґрунтовка ,як  службовий проїзд, але я про інше. Я про те, що вся та дорога йде мостом. А там буде десь до кілометра довжини.
І рекомендую обирати підложку (знімок зі супутника) під карту не Bing, бо ті знімки десятилітньої давності
dieterdreist (2020-10-06 22:11:14+00:00): Ciao MSa e benvenuto!
Un'osservazione: Il tag "image" non dovrebbe contenere un'elaborato grafico come un biglietto da visita, ma piuttosto una fotografia dell'esterno del palazzo.

Grazie,
Martin
trigpoint (2020-10-03 16:16:46+00:00): Hi
Just wondering why you changed Glenfield Social Club to a bar? It was correctly mapped as a Social Club which more accurately describes what it is and implies you cannot simply walk in. 

They are a very common feature in most UK towns and villages.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_club although our mapping of them is often a bit lacking unfortunately.

Cheers Phil
RAC_UK (2020-10-03 18:20:46+00:00): Hi Phil,

I was unaware of that particular tag until you mentioned it.
It does not show as a preset in the tools I normally use, so I used what seemed the best fit.
I will change this back shortly.

Regard Richard
trigpoint (2020-10-03 23:00:56+00:00): Thank you Richard
SK53 (2020-10-05 13:29:48+00:00): Hi Richard,

You're not the only one. I had a go at documenting this a while back on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_club. 

Often mapped as pubs & bars, but given these are members' clubs it's worth having the distinction, but they definitely belong in the same category as other pubs & bars. It often requires real local knowledge as to whether anyone can wander in & get a drink. Also significant in their own right as, declining, cultural institutions. (Alternative such as leisure=club, club=social don't separate them from things like WIs, which I think is important).

Regards,

Jerry aka SK53
user_6446486 (2020-09-30 21:49:38+00:00): Добрый вечер.
1. Скажите, пожалуйста, из какого источника взяты обозначения тяговых подстанций вида ТПС-xxx, которые в корне отличаются от принятых в РЖД ЭЧЭ-xx? И почему Апрелевка превратилась в Железнодорожную (это я исправил)?
2. Не надо удалять выходное напряжение 6 кВ на тяговых подстанциях - запитку ЛЭП автоблокировки никто не отменял :)
stargunru (2020-10-01 15:37:46+00:00): Источник я использую вот этот: https://minenergo.mosreg.ru/dokumenty/napravleniya-deyatelnosti/elektroenergetika/osnovnye-dokumenty/12-08-2020-12-43-56-postanovlenie-gubernatora-moskovskoy-oblasti-ot
ТПС-xxx, признаю, взял откуда-то с викимапии, хотя в этом документе она просто ПС-441
Но это именно Железнодорожная, т.к. именно к Железнодорожной подходят цепи 110 кВ, а Апрелевка чуть южнее - и там только 35 кВ
user_6446486 (2020-10-01 19:30:01+00:00): Похоже, что ЭЧЭ-44 Апрелевка используется только внутри РЖД. Тогда сделал так, как сейчас: завёл alt_official_short_type, alt_name и alt_ref, и внёс туда ЖД обозначение, а в основных тегах оставил ПС-441 Железнодорожная.

Викимапия - ненадёжный источник данных, да ещё и лицензия несовместима с OSM. Для ПС Царицыно в Москве тоже номер из Викимапии был? В СиПР про неё как про ТПС-167 ни слова, а вот как ЭЧЭ-2 она прямо указана в документации на госзакупках.
user_5359 (2020-10-01 03:24:51+00:00): Hello! Please don't forget to add a amenity=place_of_worship, if the building "Our Lady of Sorrows" includes a used church.
eggie (2020-09-30 21:30:55+00:00): Dag Maarten,
Lijkt me helemaal correct nu.
MVG,
Eggie
Talitha IRM-ED (2021-06-16 07:21:11+00:00): Hi, AlejandroAlba. Hope you're doing well. I found a highway crossing with this waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/853533322), would you mind fixing this issue? or please let me know if there's any update on this area. Thank you and happy mapping!
AlejandroAlba (2021-07-09 22:28:27+00:00): done! (flood_prone)
Talitha IRM-ED (2021-07-14 08:12:37+00:00): Thank you for the update and for helping me fix this issue :)
aceman444 (2020-10-06 22:48:42+00:00): The opening hours could be OK, but whether 'note' or 'description' rarely gets shown to users. Anyway, writing it in English in a Slovak country does not seem useful.
jurajik82 (2020-10-09 21:09:56+00:00): A note was not shown in OsmAnd as it's not intended for users but a description is shown. I haven't found yet how to mark partially residential parking and what language to use if OSM doensn't provide tag to mark it. If you have an idea please share with me.
jurajik82 (2020-10-10 00:21:11+00:00): Question is how to mark parking zone where all or most parking lots have same parking conditions.
aceman444 (2020-10-26 00:14:21+00:00): We haven't yet decided in the Slovak OSM community how to tag these residential parkings (for residents free, others pay) which are being introduced in parts of Bratislava. But there are the 'fee' (takes time of day), 'charge' (takes amount) and various other conditional tags (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions).
The notes and descriptions are best written in the local language as probably local people will read it. Of course, locals may know the situation better even without OSM, and it is the visitors that need the tagging help. But then it is best to express it in the proper tags.
Also, you can display 'note' and 'fixme' tags in OsmAnd if you enable "Mapper assistant" in map details setting.
You can visit the Slovak OSM community forum at
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk if you want to discuss this.
aceman444 (2020-10-26 10:29:31+00:00): If it means that between 18:00 and 07:00 only residents can park there, you could use e.g. "access:conditional=private @ (18:00-07:00)" .
jurajik82 (2020-10-30 00:59:20+00:00): Thank you. I made changes to all parking lots in this zone.
Jethron (2020-10-13 12:21:54+00:00): Hello tzj31. Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. Adding the footpath is a good idea, but the "name" tag would be reserved for posted names such as a road name or a marked trail. For this edit, you should remove the "name" tag, but the rest of it is good. Thanks for improving OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91789476
gpserror (2020-10-03 01:50:34+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM!

While everyone needs to practice somewhere, please refrain from uploading your experimental changes.  If you were trying to experiment with metrics tracking, I'd refrain from that, there are plenty of real errors that need to be fixed!  Thanks!
mfolle (2020-10-01 18:38:02+00:00): olá, tudo bem?
acredito que tenha confundido algum parâmetro ao usar levels, a casa da esquina Guaporé-Heitor Vila Lobos não chega nem perto de 12 andares por exemplo.
Ademais acho que você sem querer deletou 3 construções que ficavam no topo da quadra e as substituiu por uma massa que não corresponde a realidade, mas isso eu resolvo pra você.
Desculpa se soei agressivo, eu tendo a ser, qualquer dúvida que tiver em relação ao sistema pode pedir de boa.
CoyKoi (2020-10-01 00:29:23+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your edits updating Parnell Businesses, it's great to have your local knowledge on the map.

I see you updated the address of the Indian restaurant, but you left the node in the same location. I have now updated the location to number 193 accordingly (and I deleted the previous node at #193 for Alphabet cafe)

I also deleted the node for Farside pub.

Don't be afraid to drag nodes to their new location if a business has moved, or delete them entirely if the business has closed :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91790332
Glassman (2020-10-01 05:44:16+00:00): I moved the gate so it is just on the service road. Otherwise NE 64th Way would be block.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91790777
Josuer (2020-11-02 17:38:50+00:00): Hola NoeRG,
encontré un tramo extraño, que está etiquetado como camino delimitado para actividades agropecuarias en un "nivel 5", es un objeto que estás tranbajando? podrías echarle un vistazo y en caso de ser necesario, eliminarlo? Muchas gracias por aportar al mapa, falta mucho mapeo por el sur oriente. Saludos
DressyPear4 (2020-10-01 23:12:35+00:00): Olá, adicione apenas coisas que existem.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91791109
blackboxlogic (2020-10-02 14:59:26+00:00): Regarding WAY: 853547902, Putting a bank underground will make editor warnings go away, but it seems wrong. Maybe a better way:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddrive-through#Usage
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91791139