piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-07-30 06:03:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

name= Cottons & more zal blijven renderen op de kaart, want die heb je NIET verwijderd.
name:nl=  .. wordt in Nederland niet gebruikt. Die tag is voor buiten Nederland!
Dit is je tagging https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72788299
Kijk je nog even?
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-07-30 06:30:41+00:00): Denk ook shop=tattoo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtattoo

en niet hobby.
eggie (2019-07-30 08:09:23+00:00): aangepast
tshsdtcaid (2019-07-30 07:23:53+00:00): I have done A Remap of the roundabout at Häradsvägen after the council has built traffic claiming measures. Th roundabout now has flairs that are used as islands for pedestrian and cycle crossings. Some checking from experienced mappers would be appreciated since his is my first roundabout. It would be nice to get it right. Please see previous change-sets as well.
ovruni (2019-07-29 23:30:45+00:00): Hello wambacher
There seems to be an error in this edition, the boundaries of the Anapia district include part of the lagoon. You can see this in the congress creation law: http://www.leyes.congreso.gob.pe/Documentos/Leyes/23606.pdf
Similarly with the limits of the province of Yunguyo: http://www.leyes.congreso.gob.pe/Documentos/Leyes/24042.pdf and the department of Puno.
regards
wambacher (2019-07-30 08:17:44+00:00): ok, no big problem for me.

there were errors and i could not fix them other way. 

will change it again.
Skinfaxi (2019-09-29 13:36:54+00:00): Hello EAman,
you have tagged some ways like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425980464#map=14/58.2166/16.5508 as a cykelway where ridning is not permitted (horse=no). I do not have made a survei att all points. But att same points i seems to be quite a normal track - i did not see any signs saying "cykelway". Are you sure that this realy is a cykelway?
EAman (2019-09-29 17:07:34+00:00): Yes, I'm pretty sure there were white rectangular signs saying "Motionsspåret Banvallen" and on the same signs there were small road sign symbols saying it's for pedestrians and cyclists but not for horse riding.
I agree that some sections of it could be tagged as a track rather as a cycleway. It was morphing between different road types in several places and I just decided it was too complex to tag every detail.
Skinfaxi (2019-11-25 16:11:42+00:00): thank you for that information. Now i undertand why i can have other information. i will splitt the way if i find a way how the determine in with part my information is correct and in with yours...
viloan (2019-07-29 22:49:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
PT-53 (2019-07-30 06:56:03+00:00): Hallo kdkeller,
ich halte das Merkmal tourism=attrection für eine Firma, die Ballonfahrten anbietet, nicht für passend. Ich habe im OSM-Forum deshalb dazu mal eine Anfrage eingestellt:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66931
Du bist eingeladen dort mitzudiskutieren.
Grüße
L'imaginaire (2019-08-28 19:28:37+00:00): Dag Pieter,

Ik zie in de namen van de gebouwen vaak een stukje beschrijving (bijv. "gebouw" of "loods"), tussen aanhalingstekens wat wellicht de echte naam van het gebouw is (bijv. "Boemerang" of "Kompas") en dan vaak nog een ref. Het lijkt me beter om de beschrijving naar de description te verhuizen (of achterwege te laten indien het duidelijk is door de gebruikte tags) en de ref in een ref-tag onder te brengen.

Groetjes,

Seppe
Pieter Vander Vennet (2019-08-29 10:56:42+00:00): Hey Seppe,

Ik ben er ook niet zo gelukkig mee, maar dat zijn wel degelijk de officiele namen, mét "gebouw 51" of "Kamp 52". Zie https://www.dehogerielen.be/sites/default/files/hoge-rielen/nieuwe_namen.pdf en https://www.dehogerielen.be/documenten-0

Tis ook de makkelijkste manier om in de hoge rielen te navigeren.

Wél ben ik akkoord dat het getal ook in de ref mag opgenomen worden, maar ze zou ook in de naam moeten blijven staan.
StephaneP (2019-08-23 13:41:51+00:00): Hi EvanE!

Why did you convert this way from cycleway to path + bicycle designated?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109713237
This way is only an example, I saw that you've converted many others cycleways.

Best,

Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
VictorIE (2019-10-27 20:35:34+00:00): Did the ancients have mobile phones? :D

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/708674682
NoelB (2019-10-28 15:05:44+00:00): maybe, fixed it
Glassman (2019-11-18 18:53:13+00:00): I can't find a reference to this park in Snohomish County database. A new user just added a park to the north is what caused me to look. Who owns and operates it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/708683172
Natfoot (2019-11-19 02:39:15+00:00): Likely the homeowners association for that neighborhood.
keithonearth (2022-11-07 17:19:31+00:00): I'm deleting the address tags from the small building that had a house number of 900 added by this edit, as I visited, and found this house number wrong.
Carnildo (2019-07-31 09:02:15+00:00): Is there a reason why you moved a couple of address points across the map in Enumclaw?
DJefferyw (2021-04-04 22:33:50+00:00): Thanks for the edit
viloan (2019-07-30 02:55:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
BAK365 (2019-07-30 19:37:07+00:00): Hallo,
so wie du die Industriezone aufteilst bzw. einzelnen Betrieben zuordnest entspricht es nicht der Realität. Was war deine Quelle? Was möchtest du mit deinen Änderungen erreichen?
BAK365 (2019-08-08 12:31:42+00:00): Revertiert in CS 73150583 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73150583 .
CurlingMan13 (2025-01-17 21:33:34+00:00): What's with all the names at the junctions.  What source(s) were used?
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-30 10:55:24+00:00): Hi jcottfrommn, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped ways and areas which are visible in the utilized satellite imagery? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72792657

#GolfMapping 
--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
k127 (2019-07-30 09:48:34+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang,

hierbei hat's dir wohl das Waldstück östlich von Haitzing zerfetzt.
Kriegst eh wieder hin, bevor der OSMI meldet und daraufhin der kartler175 vorbeikommen muss, gell?

Cheers
Klaus
opendcc (2019-07-30 10:07:34+00:00): Ich schaue es mir heute abend an - da habe ich JOSM. Hier nur iD :-(
k127 (2019-07-30 10:21:25+00:00): iD warnt bei derartigen Inkonsistenzen nicht, ne… Das ist ein bisschen ungut daran.
k127 (2019-07-30 10:24:06+00:00): …ähm, das Changeset sagt `created_by="JOSM/1.5 (14760 de)"`.
Naja, wie auch immer.
viloan (2019-07-30 03:52:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
atomwaffen (2019-07-30 21:25:23+00:00): in Sainte-Thérèse, QC
user_5359 (2019-07-30 04:27:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Access=no means hat nobody can use the highway (also the property owner). Is this right?
Twilightblue (2019-07-30 04:39:52+00:00): The road does not exist anymore.   If there is a way to delete it,  that would be a better choice, but I don’t see how to do that from iPad.
Twilightblue (2019-07-30 04:46:50+00:00): It’s an old alignment of City Creek Road.
user_5359 (2019-07-30 04:52:20+00:00): I have looked at several aerial photographs, the way is still visible. I have rededicated it from residential street to track.
viloan (2019-07-30 04:21:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-30 11:05:56+00:00): This changeset revised a mapped parking lot of a new contributor see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72783813
GinaroZ (2019-07-30 18:29:25+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding the road - however it is slightly out of alignment with the rest of the map, because you have used Maxar imagery.
Please make sure you take the time and check, then adjust the imagery before editing if using Maxar. Cheers
anilredd (2019-07-31 06:46:53+00:00): Hi GinaroZ,
 
Thanks for looking into my edit. I have made the edit according to your suggestion. I will take this as a learning and will follow it in my future edits. Let me know in case you have any further suggestion.
 
Regards
Anil.
IDKS (2019-08-02 16:17:30+00:00): Здрасти, има две спирки "Вежен" във Владиславово, може би трябва да махнем едната?
plamen (2019-08-08 19:34:01+00:00): Кои две по-точно?
IDKS (2019-08-09 00:54:15+00:00): Тези, не искам да се бъркам, че много не ми се отдават хич релациите.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2276922537
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6641194958
plamen (2019-08-09 19:23:54+00:00): Сега е по PTv2 (или почти) с public_transport=stop_position
и
public_transport=platform.
Има и по-нова версия обаче.
DD1GJ (2020-07-07 09:09:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452154072/history

Das ist kein Fußweg, sondern eine Fahrbahn auf dem Pakplatz. Die Zufahrt erfolgt durch eine Rampe unter dem ebenerdigen Parkdeck hindurch, siehe Schattenwurf  bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6436377966/history
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-08-01 08:37:02+00:00): UKR: added destination=Кременчук;Олександрія;destination:int_ref=E 584;destination:ref=M-22
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-30 10:40:35+00:00): UKR: added destination=Iванкiв;Бориспiль;added destination:ref=М-03
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-30 10:41:01+00:00): UKR: added destination=Летичiв;added destination:ref=М-12
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-30 10:39:52+00:00): UKR: added destination=Киiв;added destination:ref=М-05
kartonage (2019-07-30 06:36:45+00:00): Hallo jessgerken,

mir und anderen Usern ist aufgefallen, dass deine Changesets falsche Daten auf systematische Weise produzieren. Ganze Blöcke werden von dir auf building=house gesetzt. In vielen Fällen trifft das allerdings überhaupt nicht zu und andere Auswahlmöglichkeiten innerhalb von StreetComplete würden passender sein.

Da die Changesets auch über einen längeren Zeitraum verstreut Gebäude innerhalb eines Blockes nach und nach um building=house ergänzen, kommt bei mir der Verdacht auf, dass du hier überhaupt nicht vor Ort bist. Die systematisch abgearbeiteten Blöcke sind mitunter auch weit entfernt voneinander.

Dieses Verhalten ist schädlich für OpenStreetMap, weil es die Daten verfälscht und Anwender sich nicht auf die Daten verlassen können. Desweiteren ist

Ich würde dich bitten dich dazu zu äußern.

Schöne Grüße
user_5359 (2019-07-30 06:31:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your change set because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
kartonage (2019-07-30 06:36:42+00:00): Hallo markri,

mir und anderen Usern ist aufgefallen, dass deine Changesets falsche Daten auf systematische Weise produzieren. Ganze Blöcke werden von dir auf building=house gesetzt. In vielen Fällen trifft das allerdings überhaupt nicht zu und andere Auswahlmöglichkeiten innerhalb von StreetComplete würden passender sein.

Da die Changesets auch über einen längeren Zeitraum verstreut Gebäude innerhalb eines Blockes nach und nach um building=house ergänzen, kommt bei mir der Verdacht auf, dass du hier überhaupt nicht vor Ort bist. Die systematisch abgearbeiteten Blöcke sind mitunter auch weit entfernt voneinander.

Dieses Verhalten ist schädlich für OpenStreetMap, weil es die Daten verfälscht und Anwender sich nicht auf die Daten verlassen können. Desweiteren ist

Ich würde dich bitten dich dazu zu äußern.

Schöne Grüße
Kovoschiz (2019-07-31 02:20:15+00:00): Better specify it's not a surface reservoir first https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/72834566
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72795980
HighlandMark (2019-08-01 19:22:15+00:00): Thanks for catching my slip of the fingers!
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:55:16+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-30 10:38:29+00:00): UKR: added destination=Дмитрiвка;Житомир;Чоп;added destination:ref=М-06
mueschel (2019-07-31 16:16:10+00:00): Hi,
you added 185 nodes with several strange tags - could you have a look and fix this?
E.g.
mr_challengeId=8187
mr_mappedOn=2019-06-21 08:11:12.719204
mr_taskId=19350815
mr_taskName=Medwin Hospital
mr_taskPriority=High
mr_taskStatus=Already_Fixed
Neena2309 (2019-08-01 06:41:44+00:00): Hi Mueschel,

Thank you so much from bringing into my notice.
 It was accidentally uploaded I have fixed them in Changeset: 72882747

Thank you again 
Happy Mapping
user_5359 (2019-08-02 14:20:45+00:00): Hello! You forgot eight nodes (all on the same place): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6659896281/history, ..6659932404, ..6659932405, ..6659932408, ..6659896280, ..6659932370, ..6659932362, ..6659896271
I delete this node with change set 72943327.
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-30 10:37:18+00:00): UKR: added destination=Курне;Житомир;Киiв;added destination:ref=М-06
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-08-01 08:34:35+00:00): UKR: added destination=Сімферополь;destination:int_ref=E 105;destination:ref=35A-002
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:56:39+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:56:50+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
andi9876 (2019-07-30 15:03:12+00:00): Dear, why u add nodes here?
oba510 (2019-07-30 08:12:07+00:00): Please don't remove the service=parking_aisle tags from parking aisles.
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-30 10:35:56+00:00): added destination=Одеса;added destination:ref=М-05
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-08-01 08:33:29+00:00): UKR: added destination=Шербаківка;Бєлгород;destination:int_ref=E 105;destination:ref=M-20
gileri (2020-03-24 20:29:02+00:00): Bonjour,

D'après les photos satellites 2018 et les constructions autour il me semble peu probable qu'une route résidentielle soit là, pouvez-vous confirmer que c'est pas une erreur ?

Merci :)
Diebolt (2020-03-25 07:04:24+00:00): Bonjour,

De mon côté sur la photo satellite de google tout est ok.
J'ai aussi l'othophoto 2018 et tou est ok.
Cordialement.
Béatrice
gileri (2020-03-25 09:53:07+00:00): Merci pour la réponse ! Malheureusement il n'y a pas de Mapillary dans cette zone, mais Google Streetview confirme ce que je pensais : l'accès est bien interdit aux véhicules routiers par des "bollards" enlevables manuellement :

https://www.google.com/maps/@45.8189615,4.885461,3a,32.1y,108.92h,71.25t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sdL7sYg0HbsBSZWsLGl8MFg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=fr

Il s'agit donc bien d'un highway=pedestrian (ou footway), avec éventuellement un psv=yes.

Il faudra aussi matérialiser les bollards. Je le fais ou vous préférez le faire vous ?
Diebolt (2020-03-25 10:21:30+00:00): Bonjour,

Du fait du sucroit de travil lié au coronavirus je veux bien que vous le fassiez... c'est très gentil.
Merci. :)
BCNorwich (2019-08-02 17:11:41+00:00): Hi,
I've amended all your mapping.

Please use the guide here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course  for future golf course tagging.
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-08-01 08:30:52+00:00): UKR: added destination=Лубни;Полтава;Харків;destination:int_ref=E 40;destination:ref=M-03
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-30 10:56:40+00:00): Hi MoengaB, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting almost 700 buildings? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72798730

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
MoengaB (2019-07-30 13:44:25+00:00): Hello pitcscheplatsch

The purpose for deleting the buildings is that they were not aligned with any baseman available on SIM. I have already re-done all of them with Bing basemap for a more accurate representation. 

Regards
MoengaB (2019-07-30 13:47:15+00:00): basemap available on OSM*
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-30 13:59:16+00:00): Thanks for your answer. 

Comparing the removed buildings with the new ones, for me, in many cases it looks like you just deleted and redraw (moved) the same objects. Please, don't do that, it deletes the history. Thanks. 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
user_5359 (2019-07-30 09:05:33+00:00): Hello! Please notice restriction relation need three members (from, via, to). see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction#Members
Sanniu (2019-09-23 09:13:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/199982154 - is it really a living_street (no pedestrian/car separation, 30km/h) or residential one? Now tags are inconsistent.
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-08-01 08:28:29+00:00): UKR: added destination=Полтава;Харків;Велика Круча;Kиїв;destination:int_ref=E 40;destination:ref=M-03
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-08-01 08:29:28+00:00): UKR: added destination=Полтава;Харків;Велика Круча;Kиїв;destination:int_ref=E 40;destination:ref=M-03
MKnight (2019-07-30 15:14:49+00:00): Soweit ich das auf dem Luftbild erkennen kann, sind das unterschiedliche miteinander verbundene Gebäude. Warum hast Du die zu einem einzigen verschmolzen?
jwtz (2019-07-30 22:04:27+00:00): Stimmt, es sind mehrere Gebäude. Ich hab im Vorfeld versucht Richtlinien zu finden wie mit so etwas umgegangen wird. Ich habe ein großes Gebäude daraus gemacht, weil die "Durchgänge" nicht nur Durchgänge sind, sondern durch Räume die Gebäude ergänzen. Wegen deinem Kommentar habe ich mir jetzt aber mal noch vergleichbare Objekte angeschaut. Es sieht tatsächlich so aus, als ob solche Situationen durch mehrere Gebäude-Objekte gelöst werden. Gibt es dazu irgendwo eine Richtlinie oder ist das einfach eine Faustregel? Danke für den Hinweiß.
jwtz (2019-07-31 09:00:46+00:00): Ich habe nochmal nach vergleichbaren Objekten gesucht und bin auf ein mir bekanntes Schulgebäude gestoßen. Dort wurde eine ähnliche Situation auch mit einem großen Objekt statt vielen kleinen gelöst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/48.93506/9.26314

Ich denke deshalb, dass man es gut so lassen kann. Aber falls du anderer Meinung bist kannst du gerne schreiben warum. Wie schon gesagt wäre ich auch dankbar für einen Hinweiß wo man Richtlinien für solche Fälle findet :)
MKnight (2019-07-31 10:10:37+00:00): Moin,
eine Richtlinie gibt es meines Wissens für diesen Fall nicht, aber meiner Einschätzung nach gibt es einen Konsens, dass höherer Detaillierungsgrad (sofern er nicht unsinnig ist) besser ist als solche Vereinfachungen.

Des Weiteren haben die Einzelgebäude unterschiedliche Eigenschaften (Farbe, Höhe, Geschosse, Inhalt etc.), diese Eigenschaften können beim aktuellen Stand nicht vergeben werden, ohne alles nochmal neu zu zeichnen. 

Ich werde die Änderungen jetzt zurücksetzen, ich hoffe das ist ok für Dich.
MKnight (2019-07-31 10:17:50+00:00): Nachtrag: Tab zu lange offengelassen. Zu der Schule kann ich nichts sagen, da man am Luftbild schwer erkennen kann, wie die Situation genau ist.
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-30 10:35:09+00:00): UKR: added destination=Житомир;added destination:ref=М-21
Mike Baggaley (2019-09-09 19:10:42+00:00): Hi Ian, hope you are enjoying mapping. I have noticed that you have tagged a number of bridges as bridge=culvert. Please note that a bridge cannot be a culvert; if a path or road crosses a waterway in a culvert then the waterway should be tagged tunnel=culvert, not the highway tagged as bridge=culvert. Can you please review ways 708316431, 708319749, 708320415, 708761699 and about another dozen that I haven't looked at, but believe are probably yours?

Thanks,
Mike