piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-12-16 18:06:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
rskedgell (2018-12-17 09:37:29+00:00): If there isn't really a park or open space at this location, which seems highly improbable when it overlaps other real features, please do not add it to the map.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65528226
rskedgell (2018-12-18 13:02:23+00:00): Reverted by changeset #65580373. Please do not create imaginary parks. Please also read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
rskedgell (2018-12-17 09:36:32+00:00): If there isn't really a park or open space at this location, which seems highly improbable when it overlaps other real features, please do not add it to the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65528258
rskedgell (2018-12-17 09:34:28+00:00): If there isn't really a park or open space at this location, which seems highly improbable when it overlaps other real features, please do not add it to the map.
viloan (2018-12-16 18:16:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
santamariense (2019-02-06 08:53:39+00:00): Não saberia dizer se haveria mais bairros do que os que estão representados no mapa em Portão?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65528542
pio2_122 (2018-12-16 19:11:44+00:00): Dzięki za poprawkę! Na początku nazwy były ok, ale później zostały zmienione na fake'owe przez znanego wandala...
Akkurator (2019-04-20 22:59:06+00:00): Du hats in diesem CS 4 Wege mit "highway=residential" und "construction= residential" angelegt. Das geht nicht zusammen. Wenn die Wege fertig sind, muss das construction-Tag weg. Wenn sie im bau sind, muss es highway=construction heißen.

Haben die Wege keinen Namen? Maps4BW mein Morfstraße.

Außerdem fehlt eine Zufahrt zu diesen Wegen. Lt. Maps4BW gibt es eine Verbindung zur Kreuzung Christian-Fopp-Str / Spinnereistr.

Korrigierst du das bitte?

Danke!
user_8613419 (2019-04-20 23:49:35+00:00): ...wird korrigiert. Die Straßen sind zwar fertig, habe aber noch keine Anbindung ans öffentliche Straßennetz, außerdem habe sie noch keine Namen.
Akkurator (2019-04-21 10:04:36+00:00): ok, danke für die Rückmeldung + Korrektur
Jakka (2018-12-17 10:38:06+00:00): tag "designation=Kwadenbos" is hier verkeerdelijk gebruikt. Hoort eerder toe welke voertuigen mogen er op rijden. zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation?uselang=nl
Jakka (2018-12-17 10:39:42+00:00): De tweede naam tussen haakjes. Is dit een okale benaming? Dan "loc_name=*"
cyclist789 (2024-12-26 09:47:12+00:00): Jeg har vendt et antal af dine vandveje, der vendte i mærkelige retninger.
jaap de vries (2019-01-25 13:50:26+00:00): Er staan nu 3 haltes Paulus kerk hier. Klopt dat wel?
Sint E7 (2019-01-28 10:25:48+00:00): Nog niet. Leerdam moet ik nog bijwerken met mijn lijst van bushaltes en daar kom ik dus nog aan toe.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 22:08:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532876 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:31:34+00:00): This isn't accurate, please note that the ramp doesn't start until the gore, moving it out further is definitely wrong.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65530595
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 21:34:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65532349 where the changeset comment is: Rolling back inaccurate ramp geometry.
dorkmo (2018-12-16 21:47:06+00:00): "This node should be positioned as the last point before the splay at which it is still possible to make a smooth turn. "

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway_junction

should this sentence on the wiki be changed? these are marked past the point where it is still safe to turn.
Baloo Uriza (2018-12-16 22:00:59+00:00): I'm not sure why that got edited in the first place, if the split isn't at the tip of the theoretical gore, then route guidance assumes you have made the transition way too soon and announces the next instruction before you've completed the exit move and indicated distance to the ramp won't be accurate in most routers.  placement=transition along the ramp from the start to the bullnose is typical to indicate that the ramp is in transition from the main road.
mueschel (2018-12-24 12:37:46+00:00): Hi,
please note that it is not allowed to copy any data from peakbagger.com due to their copyright. Please remove everything you copied from their page.
SomeoneElse (2023-04-22 20:53:24+00:00): Hello,
I'm guessing that "disused:admin_level=Ulex europeaus" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655452132 presumably isn't what was intended?
Cheers,
Andy
SK53 (2023-04-24 07:05:26+00:00): Fixed now.
mueschel (2018-12-20 19:18:41+00:00): This changeset (again) produced many overlapping buildings and quite a number of foreign tags that shouldn't be uploaded to OSM. Additionally, the source "survey" is obviously not correct.
escada (2018-12-20 19:28:37+00:00): The changeset was a combinatie of survey en GRB. Seems like I forgot that one. Perhaps the change was still open en I got distracted.

Everything in Germany is mapped apparently that you check so much in Belgium :-)
escada (2018-12-20 19:37:34+00:00): BTW, thanks for fixing the problem. I wonder how I got the doubles.
escada (2018-12-20 20:26:25+00:00): Do you know why JOSM does not give a warning in case of overlapping buildings?
mueschel (2018-12-20 20:42:46+00:00): I got those shown as errors from the validator.
But it can't check if you didn't download the existing data from the server to the same layer.
mueschel (2018-12-17 09:24:30+00:00): Hi,
these hospitals all have a number of strange tags that are not used in other places. Could you please check the Wiki if there are any other keys already in use for these features? Please remember that all tags have to be in English (especially the values "yes" and "no").


    POP_2018=8521
    building=Moyen
    edited_by=CartONG/OSM RDC
    electricit=Lampe Torche
    health_lev=Kalemie
    health_lev1=Mutakuya
    health_ser=Cc, cpn, cps, maternite, petite chirurgie, TB, lepre, acc,traitement des maladies diarrheiques
    heliport=Non
    labo=1
    source_dat=2018-09-17
    status_sho=Bon
    status_toi=Moyen
    water=Reserve
MarTintamarre (2018-12-19 10:26:33+00:00): Dear mueschel,
Thanks for the fast feedback!
We are indeed working on refining the data model for health centers in DRC and our colleague christian shadrack has done an early upload of the data he collected in the field, while all the tags were not decided yet. As you can see he has started to fix the issues, we should be done with the corrections today or tomorrow + publish the data model (defined in line with the Référentiel Géographique Commun) soon.
Best
Martin
maraf24 (2019-01-03 20:01:09+00:00): Dlaczego skasowałeś podjazdy pod domy oraz zmieniłeś traffic_calming z cushion na table?
JJJWegdam (2020-05-04 09:39:01+00:00): What kind of object is this node referring to? You tagged it as railway=yes. It is at the postion of a switch. You named it to be a signal.
Guidaccio (2020-05-08 17:39:23+00:00): Apologies for the delay in responding. I've had a few things on at work.

Anyway, CARD328 is the approximate location of a planned train service activity according to the current long-term Network Rail timetable[*]. The name "Cardiff Signal 232" is misleading but is also taken from the timetable data,. 

An example what I mean here would be 18:27 Sunday CrossCountry train which leaves platform 3 at 18:27, moves up to TIPLOC CARD328 at 18:29, the driver changes ends, sets off again back towards the station at 18:36 arriving at Platform 2 at 18:38.

My thought is the reference will be to the signal used to control this activity west of platforms 2/3.

Does that make sense? If not, please let me know.

Thanks,

G

[*]  it was the long-term plan but with the emergency COVID19 timetable this may or may not still happen...
JJJWegdam (2020-05-12 11:29:26+00:00): Many thanks for your clear clarification. As far as I can see, the phenomenon you describe is a so called Operating Site. That's a location that serves as checkpoint for timetables (like EuroTunnel North Portal).

In OpenStreetMap, this should be tagged as railway=site. This allows it to be found and rendered on websites like OpenRailwayMap.

If you appreciate it, I can look in to your TIPLOC nodes and provide them with the correct tags.

You can also do it yourself if you prefer that. Feel free to have a look at the following link for more information:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Other_Operating_Sites
Guidaccio (2020-05-12 21:40:47+00:00): Likewise, thank you for your clear explanation and agree that these should be tagged in the way you describe. My only concern is that based on last night's OSM data there are 546 places with TIPLOC tags, of which 360 have the tag "railway" and of those are marked as "site". Although, this is a little unfair as TIPLOCs are also associated with stations (128), junctions (70) or yards (10).

I'm happy to fix the TIPLOCs I created but think there does need to be a clean up.

Having looked at the link, there are also some corner cases here, for example, if the TIPLOC is also the site of a disused railway station, would that have two tags disused:railway=station, railway=site?

I'll have look during the week and would welcome your thoughts on the other couple-of-hundred TIPLOCs that may need fixing. Noting that there are about 6568 TIPLOCs in the, and that I only tried to map the ones that are missing from other systems...

Anyway, thanks for your help with this and I'll let you know when I'm done.

G
Guidaccio (2020-05-16 12:26:36+00:00): As discussed, I have now set "empty" or "yes" on the majority (95%+) of all nodes tagged with TIPLOC in OSM to railway=site.

If you have any further questions on this, please let me know. Thanks,

G
JJJWegdam (2020-05-16 15:29:39+00:00): Sounds great! I’ll have a look. Cheers
Leo Slager (2018-12-17 16:23:23+00:00): fouten gecorrigeerd
pio2_122 (2018-12-16 22:02:18+00:00): Swoją drogą, trzeba zrobić import z poprawkami adresów dla całej gminy, ponieważ adresy w stylu 104C-1 zostały zmienione.
plamen (2018-12-17 06:59:51+00:00): Актуално и съвсем навреме!
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-02-11 03:46:33+00:00): Hi Lauretta_J,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/655479700). I also made some change around this changeset.
Thank you, happy mapping!
AgusQui (2018-12-30 05:30:16+00:00): Fijate que por Padre Ashkar - Libano - Gral Paz duplicaste interpolaciones que ya estaban
margin-auto (2019-01-01 14:04:07+00:00): "source=Bäckertüte" LOL :-)
Christopher (2018-12-19 17:55:07+00:00): Hallo johndoe, 
du hast bereits einige Ergänzungen an den Haltestellen in der Umgebung vorgenommen. Ich habe festgestellt, dass du die Haltestelle Ludwigsfelde, Krankenhaus in Krankenhaus umbenannt hast. Auf den öffentlich ausgehangenen Fahrplänen stehen alle Haltestellen von Ludwigsfelde mit den Ortsnamen davor.  An den Schildern selbst steht beide teile des Namens.
Woher hast du diese Information?
johndoe (2018-12-21 11:14:48+00:00): Hallo Christopher,
eine Münze hat immer zwei Seiten: 
vgl. mit https://www.vtf-online.de/ludwigsfelde.html
Ich habe es trotzdem zurückgeändert!

Gruß
johndoe
dzidek23 (2018-12-18 08:29:29+00:00): I'm not sure about The Undercroft taking part of Serpentine Green Building. They occupy two large spaces on the lower level in south end of the shop but above there is KFC, Vivacity Library and some other retail places. Correct me if I'm wrong but point would be more adequate that building part.
dzidek23 (2018-12-18 08:31:22+00:00): I'm sorry, it's not KFC but Burger King...
dzidek23 (2018-12-18 08:32:20+00:00): https://blr-assets.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/live/serpentinegreen/s3fs-public/centre_map/2737_BL_Master_Site_Plan_Serpentine_Green_1.pdf?4J5nPMACgf6m4dnxQtld0_5OvE952Yky
user_5173844 (2018-12-18 19:28:40+00:00): Hi dzidek23, I have only added a postcode, which coincided with a CodePoint Open unit, and changed area=yes into building:part=yes. The way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653532526/history) existed before.
Warin61 (2018-12-17 08:17:49+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM.
What does MHS mean?

Note joining Terry Rd has broken some suburban administration boundaries. This will be undone. Please be carefull. 

network=lcn is a tag for a route relation .. not on a way.
Smitology (2018-12-17 08:28:14+00:00): Sorry, MHS means Marsden High School. As you may have noticed, I am new to OSM. I encourage you to keep giving critical comments on my changes.
On an unrelated note, do you know what the difference between a path and a footpath?
Warin61 (2018-12-17 08:39:12+00:00): The 'Marsden High School Soccer Oval' also gets used for cricket. I think the 'name' is more of a description. Same for the volley ball area. 

I have mapped the individual soccer pitche and the cricket pitch. I have also mapped the school boundaries from the LPI Base Map. 

The pitches do not go to the middle of the roads. Nor does the fence go over the footpath to the middle of the roads .. I have fixed these things. 
But I do not know what sport is played on the pitch soth east of the cricket pitch. 
And I have only roughly place one volley ball court. These are things you would find much easier than me to fix.
Warin61 (2018-12-17 09:27:46+00:00): In general;
Footpath - paved, beside a road (or at least in a well maintained area)

Path - through the bush. generally unpaved

Tagging can make either the same as the other. It comes from the British who like to distinguish between them for some reason. Here we don't bother too much with the differences - one for the city the other for the bush.
pacman541 (2018-12-17 14:18:07+00:00): Парки вместо многоэтажек?
Удаляю
Andrea Musuruane (2018-12-31 16:05:41+00:00): Ciao. Si era scelto tempo fa di classificare gli alpeggi come place=locality perché non sono luoghi abitati stabilmente tutto l'anno. Se invece fossero abitati stabilmente, bisognerebbe usare place=farm. L'etichetta place=isolated_dwelling invece indica un insediamento composto da 1 o 2 abitazioni (e non di più e non altro tipo di edifici). Ciao, Andrea
Glassman (2018-12-17 06:39:23+00:00): I reverted this edit. The ways are untagged and duplicate existing roads. 

Your edits go live as soon as you upload. Please only add features that can be verified. This is not a test database. 

I'll send you some info in a message to help you get started.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65534869
bazbazbaz (2018-12-28 22:34:20+00:00): you have erroneously changed a landuse boundary into a highway. I have corrected the mistake.
viloan (2018-12-17 01:36:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-12-17 02:15:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-12-17 03:13:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GOwin (2018-12-22 08:18:45+00:00): Hello @joebertsss. Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM). 

It has been noted that personal and private information were added to buildings in this changeset.  The freedom to map the world in OSM has limitations where it violates the privacy of people living in this world.  For OSM policy details on this matter, refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information.

Names of the inhabitants of these dwellings has been redacted from all your changesets.

If you have questions or concerns, please let me know or reach out the local mapping community: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PH/channels

Cheers,
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65536709
mavl (2019-07-21 13:08:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:08:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:08:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:08:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
ndm (2018-12-17 09:40:40+00:00): This seems odd - Bing streetside doesn't show Bishop Monk Avenue -- how did you get to see the barriers. Also imagery seems to be 6 years old -- there seem to be  new houses and roads here on OSM not on Bing.
pattamaa (2018-12-18 07:22:26+00:00): Thanks for the update, we have rechecked and removed the lift gate since there is a new development as per your recommendation. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.
happychang (2019-04-08 18:51:21+00:00): 2018/11/14 變更集：64481794
add 交通寧靜區-慶南街,友愛街

被這個改回去?
mavl (2019-07-21 13:08:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
PT-53 (2018-12-17 09:00:48+00:00): Hallo  thetornado76,
Du hast für den ADAC-POI in Biberach https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3233957563/history club=automobile ergänzt, was gem. WIKI auch korrekt ist.
Was ist aber mit den vorhandenen Merkmalen shoß=car_repair und car_service=breakdown ? Sollten diese nicht gelöscht werden ?
Fragende Grüße
thetornado76 (2018-12-17 10:30:14+00:00): Stimmt die können weg, habe ich vergessen zu löschen. Auch auf deren Homepage gibt es keinen Hinweis, dass es dort um eine Werkstatt handelt.
Danke und viele Grüße zurück
vira_02 (2019-07-12 08:53:17+00:00): Hi Elisabeth,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way 629018171 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'tertiary'.

As of now correcting the data. Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2019-07-12 09:02:04+00:00): thank you for your discussion, i think i agree with you
Mike Baggaley (2019-01-07 17:50:29+00:00): HI, in this edit two bicycle routes, relations 9114441 and 9114443 have been added. These have no names and no details. Did you intend these to be part of some other route?

Cheers,
Mike