piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
puma515 (2022-10-08 13:54:31+00:00): Hallo Svalbard,
Vielen Danke für den Hinweis.

Als ich hier den Hauptweg vor 10 Monaten angepasst habe hatte ich dort zuvor bei einer Tour am südlichen ende eine Schild gesehen.
weshalb ich dachte das ist ein privatweg.  Die anpassung hier war nur um die dadurch entstandenen routinginseln zu beheben. 

Der Naturpark Aukrug zeigt die Radroute so auch auf seiner webseite an.
Ich gehe daher davon aus das ich mich vertan habe und das dort nur ein verbot für Kraftfahrzeuge ist.

Ich werde die Strecke morgen mal mit dem Rad überprüfen und das dann genau anpassen.

schön gruß 
puma515
puma515 (2022-10-09 15:19:28+00:00): War vor ort, die Schilder sind wiedersprüchlich. 
Es gibt vor ort zum einen die kleinen grünen Radfahrschilder die den weg über diese route ausweisen aber die andren Schilder die auch dort Stehen sagen das ist ein Privatweg der nur bei den Öffnungszeiten für Radfahrer und Fußgänger frei ist.
Am Ostende steht auch noch ein ausgeblichenes VZ250 mit Fahrad frei. 
Das die ausgeschilderten Radrouten (Grüne Schilder) über privatgrund führen habe ich noch nirgentwo gesehen. 

Es gibt aber auch ein Alternativweg der mit den Radrouten Schilden ausgestattet ist Südlich der Teichanlage. 

Bilder der Zufahrten:

Ost: https://ibb.co/yntQ1JJ
West: https://ibb.co/fSJLX27

Ich weiß nicht wie ich das so richtig erfassen soll.
puma515 (2022-10-09 15:22:47+00:00): also der weg südlich der Teiche hat auch nur die Grünen Radfahrschilder die eigentliche Route ist dort nirgentwo extra ausgeschildert
puma515 (2022-10-09 15:36:56+00:00): Habe nun dem Naturpark Aukrug per email eine frage zu der situation gestellt. Hoffe die können mir sagen ob die route dort so stimmt.
puma515 (2022-10-15 22:05:01+00:00): Antworten leider nicht ich habe nun die wege auf das was nach lage vor ort laut wiki passend ist geändert auf:

access=permit
horse=no
motor_vehicle=private
Svalbard (2022-10-16 04:48:26+00:00): Hallo puma515, vielen Dank für Deine Recherche und die Anpassungen!
Gruß Svalbard
puma515 (2022-10-17 18:35:17+00:00): Hallo Svalbard.
Es geht hier doch noch weiter da der Betreiber der Route mir nun doch noch geantwortet hat das es dort wirklich so ist und sie nun wegen meinem hinweiß das auch auf ihre webseite zu der route als hinweis hinzugefügt haben. 

Da ich mit dem Tags hier nun nicht zufrieden war und das genau erfassen wollte habe ich das ganze im Forum besprochen und nun ist der weg mit öffnungszeiten auf die genau Lage vor ort angepasst. angepasst. 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/fahrrad-route-mit-offnungszeiten-wie-richtig-erfassen/4215/4

Schön gruß puma515
Svalbard (2022-10-17 18:55:40+00:00): Hallo puma515, auf der rechten Seite des Weges steht ein „Durchfahrt verboten“-Schild mit dem Zusatz „Fahrrad frei“. Die ganze Schilderkombination auf der östlichen Seite ist sehr merkwürdig. Auf der westlichen Seite (bei den Gebäuden) gibt es das „Privatweg-Schild“ nicht, dafür aber das Tor. Ob das wirklich an den Ruhetagen geschlossen ist? Ich glaube nicht, dass ein Radfahrer die östliche Beschilderung beachten wird, sondern, sofern möglich, sein Rad über das Tor heben wird. Den Weg kenne ich schon sehr lange und m. E. gab es früher keine derartige Beschilderung. Man sollte die Route über die Teichanlage vielleicht komplett verlegen. Gruß Svalbard
Svalbard (2022-10-17 18:59:45+00:00): Hallo puma515, habe gerade beim nochmaligen Lesen der Kommentare gesehen, dass Du das VZ250 mit Zusatz bereits erwähnt hattest.
puma515 (2022-10-17 19:10:45+00:00): Ich meine auch das dort früher keine Schilder standen.
Aber jetzt sind sie da und die
Route soll so laut der Mail antwort vom Naturpark Aukrug richtig sein.
Es gibt vom betreiber auch ein hinweis zu dieser Stelle: https://www.holstein-tourismus.de/de/unsere-region/detailansicht/detail/aukrug-erlebnis-tour-51-km.html

Habe hier vorhin auch noch entsprechend dem vorschlag im Forum eine Alternativroute erstellt so das zu allen Tageszeiten eine Navigation über die ganze route möglich sien sollte. https://www.holstein-tourismus.de/de/unsere-region/detailansicht/detail/aukrug-erlebnis-tour-51-km.html
puma515 (2022-10-17 19:15:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6245517#map=15/53.9724/9.6667
CloCkWeRX (2022-12-03 02:03:50+00:00): This seems in the wrong place, vs the address listed.
nevw (2022-12-03 12:37:53+00:00): Yes, the website has a map link that places it in a different location too.
CloCkWeRX (2022-12-04 04:25:40+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=286761939711210&focus=photo&lat=-33.8698448&lng=151.19342919997&z=17&x=0.783317455881694&y=0.5060849986193738&zoom=2.178419442331599 suggests this is ... "Harris Miller Cafe"?
nevw (2022-12-04 05:47:46+00:00): Agreed…also on the cnr of Harris and Miller Sts.
Claudius Henrichs (2022-10-09 09:23:19+00:00): Hi,
Did you consciously deleted the station and stop position nodes for 	São Sebastião?
E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6417780992/history
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-08 09:36:50+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards. I reviewed a number of your changesets and they all show the same issues.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127181405
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Carto'Cité (2023-12-12 06:57:05+00:00): Bonjour Simlapse,
Merci pour tes contributions sur les aménagements cyclables.
J'ai remarqué ces contributions que tu as faites il y a maintenant plus d'un an et je voulais te demande si tu passes dans le secteur régulièrement ou bien si tu te souviens de ces aménagements. Il s'agit principalement ces éléments décrits en pistes : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101865051
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101865049
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/411609304
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230515828
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1230515831
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/572419897
J'ai un doute sur le fait qu'il s'agisse de pistes à proprement parler, c'est à dire avec un panneau B22a ou C113. J'ai l'impression qu'il s'agit plus d'espaces partagés avec les piétons, peut-être avec une séparation explicite mais pas de « vrais » pistes. Dans ce cas la description serait plutôt :
highway=path
bicycle=designated
surface=asphalt/etc.
segregated=yes/no
path=crossing (pour les traversées)
Si tu as des informations à ce sujet ou même dans l'idéal des photos à verser sur Panoramax ou Mapillary ce serait génial 🙂
Et si tu as la moindre question, n’hésite pas à me contacter.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Ewen Hill (2022-10-08 06:11:33+00:00): Hi, I think the middle two of the four car lanes are still intact
eggie (2022-10-08 06:43:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
Thanks for your contribution. 
I removed the duplicated tagging here.
Greetz,
eggie
user_11560131 (2022-10-09 17:23:53+00:00): Please update the line name: Metro K Line (Crenshaw)
willkmis (2022-10-09 18:26:12+00:00): I don't see any indication from Metro that this line is called anything but the K line, so I don't think adding (Crenshaw) would be correct. See https://www.metro.net/riding/schedules/, compare how it's written "Metro K Line" versus the other lines, e.g. "Metro E Line (Expo)". My personal hunch is that they'll drop the parentheticals entirely once the Regional Connector opens and re-routes many of the existing named lines, since they're just remnants of the old naming scheme that predate the K line's operation.
eggie (2022-10-08 07:40:37+00:00): Buiten Nederland begonnen, maar nog geen welkomstbericht ontvangen.. Bij deze .. 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
bugdog (2022-10-08 08:47:00+00:00): yes!!!
sykul (2022-10-08 10:34:52+00:00): ;)
Taya_S (2022-10-08 06:29:07+00:00): Question (and reason I put it on reviewreview): Should I keep all the intermittend water part of the "Dwingeloosche heide" Multipolygon? I think the white stripes look unappealing, and whenever there is no water it is largely still heathland.
eggie (2022-10-08 07:52:11+00:00): Dag Thiscal..   Soms zal er water staan.. in droge tijden niet.
Zelf neem ik die intermittents soms bewust niet op als inner. Dan zie je gewoon de heide er door heen.
Beetje taggen voor de renderer... dat wel :)

Anders een vraagje voor het nieuwe forum..
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/nl/43

Groet
eggie
Taya_S (2022-10-08 08:10:38+00:00): Top, dankje voor de feedback
literan (2022-10-08 10:54:13+00:00): так делать не принято, дороги делать членами мультиполигона. Линия дороги проводится по ее центру - получается, что парк занимает половину дороги
user_5359 (2022-10-17 06:36:52+00:00): Hallo! Schau Dir bitte http://www.osm.org/node/10083178826 an. Was ist die Bedeutung vom Tag contakt:odnoklassniki = https://ok.ru/mostikinte?
APneunzehn74 (2022-10-17 07:00:28+00:00): Hallo, odnoklassniki ist ein russisches Netzwerk im Prinzip das selbe wie unser Facebook oder so, deshalb wollte ich es mit dem selben Schema angeben. Der Mostik Verein nutzt das für seine russisches Mitglieder. Mir ist schon klar das so etwas vermutlich nie ausgewertet wird. Hättest du einen besseren Vorschlag?
Grüße APneunzehn74
user_5359 (2022-10-17 09:10:15+00:00): Es gibt den Schlüssel contact_ok (siehe https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=contact%3Aok)
APneunzehn74 (2022-10-17 09:29:17+00:00): Vielen Dank für's, nachsehen den hatte ich nicht gefunden.
Larmax (2022-10-08 08:00:13+00:00): Tuskin tossa on tällästä varastoa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=warehouse?uselang=en