piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
EneaSuper (2021-11-09 14:13:20+00:00): Ciao, stavo revisionando il tuo lavoro ed ho trovato molto strano il poligono della riprofilazione:

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=113565807

Sicuro di averlo fatto bene? Ha una forma un po' strana.
mueschel (2021-11-12 10:12:29+00:00): Hi
it looks like this import went wrong.

- boundaries seem to be shifted by ~10km to the south
- the ways have several foreign tags that shouldn't appear in OSM
-some ways overlap with already existing boundaries
- the source of the data is not correctly given in the changeset
- the mandatory link to the documentation of the import is missing.
ivanbranco (2021-11-10 19:44:43+00:00): Ola Beatriz, bem-vinda on OpenStreetMaps :)

There's a problem here:
Aberto=9:00 - 19:00
name=Shopping 45

Aberto is not a valid tag, you can use opening_hours=09:00-19:00

Also you need to add a tag that describes what the place is. From the name I think is a shop=* right? You have to find the right value thought, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Ashop

Write me if you need help or contact your local community, they will be happy to help you :)
Lee Carré (2021-11-11 08:59:49+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/2694727
SHARCRASH (2021-11-09 13:43:44+00:00): + other positions enhanced
cquest (2021-11-10 21:51:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Dans ce cas, il faut indiquer que le sentier est privé (access=private) car en le supprimant, il y a de fortes chance que quelqu'un le rajoute dans une avenir plus ou moins proche.
Je l'ai donc restauré et ajouté le caractère privé.
Merci de l'avoir signalé.
Mathieu CHARREYRE (2021-11-11 06:35:09+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci de ce retour, mais il n'y a aucune raison que ce petit sentier que j'ai créé à la force de mon poignet soit indiqué sur des cartes.
A ce compte, le Domaine fourmillerait de sentiers sur OSM.
A vous lire.
Mathieu CHARREYRE (2021-11-11 06:39:22+00:00): P.S : Je ne compte pas entretenir ce chemin fait mains, il va donc naturellement se refermer.
L'information de l'existence d'un sentier est donc erronée, et incite des quidams à rentrer chez moi illégalement.
Le site du Domaine : http://saint-antonin.net
ToniE (2021-11-09 14:09:07+00:00): Hi tubeli,

Oops wie passen amenity=driving_school und cuisine=ice_cream, diet:xxx, ... zusammen?

Evtl. beim Wechsel von Cafe auf Fahrschule vergessen die anderen Tags zu löschen?

Gruß,
Toni
tubeli (2021-11-09 16:18:24+00:00): Ups, ja übersehen da sie im mobilen client standardmässig nicht angezeigt waren. Habs gefixt!
martinst (2021-11-09 17:00:20+00:00): Hallo, wieso hast Du den Höhleneingang wieder rausgelöscht?
Carlo02 (2021-11-09 18:00:12+00:00): Aus Naturschutzgründen
DaveF (2021-12-30 21:17:13+00:00): Hi
Could you clarify what this is please.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9238133789#map=16/60.6144/-1.1413
RaccoonFederation (2021-11-09 17:08:02+00:00): Please add descriptions for the changes you have made to each changeset.
Thank you
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-10 05:55:24+00:00): Hi danielrjermyn, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.

#golf #course #mapping
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
djerm (2022-02-09 19:29:51+00:00): Sorry, I am just now realizing that people have been commenting on my changesets, and only just now found out the way to respond.

I was building temporary boundaries for viewing in a 3rd party app. In the future, I will stick to creating the genuine features (rather than the artificial ones) in order comply with community guidelines. Thank you for reaching out.
b-jazz (2022-03-20 05:33:25+00:00): There is a test version of OSM if you need to test out changes with software that you're developing. Maybe that would work better for you during testing. In the meantime, I'm going to delete this way as it was still there tonight and is officially the largest fairway with 4 nodes defined in the United States.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-11-09 17:08:27+00:00): Könntet Ihr bitte weitere Änderungen unterlassen und Euer Vorhaben zuerst mit der OSM-Community besprechen?!

Leider ist auch diese Änderung fehlerhaft (falsche Syntax). :-(
Dodko (2021-11-09 14:55:26+00:00): Bolo to podľa katastra tam je Ostrá na západ https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/zbgis/79/576379?pos=48.789028,21.623795,18 s vyškou 508 https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/zbgis/20/18115?pos=48.789037,21.623695,18
Slavo87 (2021-11-09 16:03:00+00:00): Ahoj! Viem, pozeral som zdroj a tam je to tiež zle. Bývam pod tými kopcami a tak to viem doložiť aj reálnymi fotkami. Len neviem kde to mám nahlásiť, nevieš? Ďakujem za info!
Dodko (2021-11-09 20:13:43+00:00): S týmto nemám skúsenosti, skúsil by som tu http://www.skgeodesy.sk/sk/ugkk/kontakty/ prípadne napísať otázku na fórum https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk
ivanbranco (2021-11-20 12:47:41+00:00): Ciao Paolo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195417922/

Questo ref:mise mi sembra sbagliato, dai dati del MISE sembra appartenere a questo benzinaio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/395537484/
Paolo pn (2021-11-20 13:06:07+00:00): Ciao Ivan, 
grazie per l'osservazione, hai ragione. Il codice corretto è 43949. Ero stato tratto in inganno dalla preesistente classificazione come Total Erg, in realtà è Api-IP. Correggo subito
SomeoneElse (2021-12-24 16:08:35+00:00): Hello, I've joined https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000817343/history to the north to fix a gap in the Fife Coastal Path here.  Presumably "foot=designated" means that there is a public right of way here. subject to https://www.mygov.scot/scottish-outdoor-access-code ?
Futur3r (2021-11-12 19:36:24+00:00): Bonjour,

Le parking est déjà cartographier via la valeur parking_entrance.

Ça créé un doublon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113567136
ma-rt-in (2023-03-18 17:26:45+00:00): Hallo,

woher stammt die Info das die Malteser hier eine Rettungswache betreiben?

vg
luca sski (2023-03-18 17:56:59+00:00): Hi, das Gebäude war zu dem Zeitpunkt von außen als solches zu erkennen und ist auf der zugehörigen Seite erfasst: https://www.malteser.de/standorte/hilden.html
ma-rt-in (2023-03-18 18:00:09+00:00): Alles klar. Danke für die Info
Lee Carré (2021-11-11 08:57:09+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/2689281
vulasala (2021-11-10 03:52:10+00:00): Hi ISL0228,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1000821640 and way 1000821641, as there is no path.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113567809
b-holdet (2021-11-09 17:08:37+00:00): Der var du s.. hurtig :-)
UffeKousgaard (2021-11-09 22:18:37+00:00): Sådan er os på A-holdet !
praeteritum (2023-06-05 03:31:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136953222.
itineris (2022-05-08 20:05:26+00:00): A (2.) telefonszámot is. ;-)

És a felsorolásoknál pontosvesszőt kell használni.

Üdv:
Ákos
eggie (2021-11-09 17:56:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
EP_Repair (2021-12-15 22:44:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114980221 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000225 where opportunity was given to respond or correct issues and no action was taken by thelidarking see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114968909
Tor H (2021-11-09 14:57:26+00:00): Detta är ett sommarstugeområde och i princip inga fastboende, alltså inga vanliga bostadshus. Är inte cabin korrekt tagg för sommarstugor? /Tor H
archie (2021-11-09 15:18:25+00:00): Det här lär besvara din fråga: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dcabin. "roughly built house". Det är det väl knappast fråga om här.
archie (2021-11-09 15:20:54+00:00): Förresten; de hus du ritar in är allihopa felplacerade. Vad sägs om att justera din satellitbildbakgrund enligt detta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
Tor H (2021-11-09 15:36:49+00:00): Tack för info. Jag har försökt justera men det är klurigt. Prövar igen. /Tor H
Akkurator (2021-11-22 00:20:36+00:00): Hallo Hugo_Ball,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26814939
dieses Stück der Friedhofstraße ist auch für Fahrräder nur in einer Richtung zugelassen.
Ich habe das Tag "oneway:bicycle=no" daher wieder entfernt.

Das Tag "cycleway:left=separate" halte ich hier auch für unangebracht, da es nur für 1/3 des Weges gilt, nicht entlang der Parkplätze. Bringt außerdem keinen Informationsgewinn.
Hab's daher ebenfalls wieder entfernt.
Wenn das dran muss, dann nur an dem kurzen Stück, wo auch wirklich ein Radweg ist. Also müsste man dafür die Straße aufteilen. 

Grüße,
Akkurator
Ltrlg (2021-11-10 12:35:14+00:00): Attention à la parallaxe sur les objets hauts : le pied de la cheminé du village Saint-Léonard (way/889160974) est décalé par rapport à son sommet sur l’Ortho HR (cf. changeset/113606471).
l3BAM (2021-11-11 13:39:19+00:00): Étonnant car je m'étais bien basé sur Ortho HR mais peut-être qu'une de mes machines présente un décalage. Je vérifierai. J'ai recalé. On devrait se référencer sur la base de la cheminée mais on la voit mal et comme elle est relativement basse, ça ira.
Merci de vore alerte. Est-ce que cela convient ?
l3BAM (2021-11-11 13:51:33+00:00): Pas super comme modification. JOSM a affecté la modification aux nœuds au lieu du chemin (way). Je ne sais pas pourquoi. Un bug ? Cela ne se voit pas sur le rendu.
l3BAM (2021-11-11 13:52:29+00:00): changeset/113652825
Ltrlg (2021-11-12 10:10:19+00:00): changeset/113652825 est incorrect, j’avais déjà tenté de corriger dans changeset/113606471. Vu que le Cadastre la place encore plus à l’ouest que ce que j’avais fait (collée au bâtiment), il faudrait que je passe sur place pour voir, mais votre modification la met au moins deux mètres trop à l’est.
l3BAM (2021-11-12 14:04:36+00:00): La base de la cheminée est difficile à voir et faute de mieux je la confondais avec le haut. J'ai changé de machine afin d'avoir un meilleur contraste. Je peux donc rectifier en me calant sur Ortho HR. Ce décalage est dû à la perspective de la photo qérienne : l'avion qui l'a prise n'était pas juste au-dessus de la cheminée.
changeset/1136897881
l3BAM (2021-11-12 14:07:18+00:00): Oups c'est plutôt le changeset 113697881
aldonciak (2021-11-09 15:27:40+00:00): Zmiany są złe. Prośba o ich wycofanie
SomeoneElse (2021-11-09 15:22:18+00:00): Reverts previous to this were done from the wrong user, from https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113562261 on for 4 changesets.
NieWnen (2021-11-09 16:05:48+00:00): W sumie to dlaczego nie maxweight?
adamsc (2021-11-09 18:56:42+00:00): maxweight dotyczy rzeczywistej masy pojazdu i dotyczy wszystkich pojazdów. Znak B5 odnosi sie do DMC - dopuszczonej masy całkowitej dla pojazdów ciężarowych. Dodatkowo zakazuje poruszania sie sprzetem rolniczym, pojazdami wolnobieznymi. Stąd inne tagowanie.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Road_signs_in_Poland
NieWnen (2021-11-09 19:29:55+00:00): Rzeczywiście. 
Wydawało mi się, że tam był B-18, ale teraz zajrzałem w dokumentację i się mocno przyjrzałem na rozmazanym zdjęciu jest kształt pojazdu :P

To wszystko jasne w takim razie.
Lee Carré (2021-11-13 09:17:55+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Владимир К (2021-11-13 08:12:06+00:00): Добрый день!
Не нужно отмечать заброщенные заправки историческими ошибками, это неверно
Владимир К (2021-11-14 15:37:22+00:00): историческими руинами*
Lee Carré (2021-11-11 08:55:30+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/2662669
Lee Carré (2021-11-11 08:55:15+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/2662669
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-11-09 17:33:20+00:00): (Fortsetzung CS-Kommentar:)

Wikidata und Wikipedia-Tags von Infotafel gelöscht, da diese an das entsprechende Objekt (Grabhügelfeld) gehören
AkuAnakTimur (2021-11-09 15:59:27+00:00): https://kartaview.org/details/2361826/4125/track-info
Mashin (2021-12-16 22:00:10+00:00): Hi,
please do not delete existing objects such as forests or grass.
GinaroZ (2021-11-09 17:32:14+00:00): Hi, what routing problems are you referring to?
SK53 (2021-11-10 13:27:15+00:00): I presume one of the routing engines was directing people to one of the roads either side of the station. However, moving the station node is not particularly good practice. A simple foot way through the entrance foyer would have sufficed: in fact it exists, has done so for 2 years: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761027930/history.

It would be worth: a) seeing if routers accept highway=corridor (presumably not); b) use an explicit railway station entrance tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Arailway%3Dtrain_station_entrance); c) change the highway=corridor to highway=footway with covered=yes. Note the latter might not entirely resolve routing because the platforms are mapped as areas.

Station nodes are used for other purposes than foot or car access as well.
praeteritum (2023-06-04 20:15:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136946989.
Carto'Cité (2022-01-17 14:58:49+00:00): Bonjour Alix.
Tu as dû faire une fausse manip' sur ces 2 nodes: https://www.osm.org/node/8894895440 et 
https://www.osm.org/node/27286655. Il y a une piste cyclable en construction sur la section de rue entre ces nodes ?
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
alix_geovelo (2022-01-17 16:36:24+00:00): Bonjour Antoine,

Merci pour ton retour !

Je bossais sur la fermeture de ce côté de la porte de maillot à la circulation suite à la remontée d'un utilisateur, il y a eu en effet des erreurs sur des nodes (il semble que je souhaitait indiquer que la way était en construction).
J'ai supprimé ces tags sur ces points, je pense que c'est ok ! N'hésite pas si ce n'est pas le cas :)

Alix de Geovelo
Kha_nam (2021-11-10 06:52:59+00:00): Hi Khoirul Fananii
Kindly remove the road as there are no destinations to creat a road
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113572228
ZenPhil (2021-11-11 21:40:07+00:00): Hi @Hiblet. Just been making some edits around the golf course, and had a few things I was not sure about based on your edits? I'm no expert so open to your input but was unsure about:
- The cart path tag has afaik been replaced by highway=path, highway=service, golf_cart=designated (see wiki)
- The paths you've uploaded are duplicating and not coordinated with the existing foot path plots already on the map?
- A lot of the cart paths you've added aren't connected - is this intentional?
- Some of the paths are tagged as shapes rather than lines using area=yes golf=cartpath - I was under the impression they can only be lines?

Appreciate your thoughts and let me know if there is more up to date guidance you are following
Hiblet (2021-11-12 10:08:31+00:00): The map is being used to generate data for loading into an app that makes golf courses for a video game (hence most of my edits are golf related).
The app searches for golf tags, so if the tags are changed, the paths will not be available to download.
The paths are duplicated because the existing paths were not very accurate.  I need accurate splining to make a good model.  I have the choice of either correcting and tagging existing paths, or adding a correct path.  I chose to add so that I did not interfere with someone elses work.
Some paths connect, some do not.  Sometimes I use a breach to indicate the path type is changing.  Sometimes it is just that the connection is missed.  It has no impact on the download for me if two paths do not connect.
Where there are paved areas, I use a cart path area to map out the area. These do not appear on the graphical rendering of the resulting map, but they do come in on the API download, so I am trying here to use a harmless way to get the info I need without messing up the map.  
So, summary, all of these oddities are targeted at getting data from OSM but at the same time hopefully adding useful info to the maps.
GerdP (2023-09-30 09:33:05+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Dein Kommentar verwirrt mich. Ein 3m breiter "Weg", auf dem KFZ fahren dürfen, ist doch eher kein Pfad, sondern entweder Wirtschaftsweg oder Zufahrt? Ich habe den nördlichen Teil abgetrennt und als service erfasst, beim südl. Teil scheint mir service mindestens bis zu diesem Gelände https://www.osm.org/way/1212013850 sinnvoll.
klaus-kannemann (2023-09-30 09:47:22+00:00): Ja, ich glaube Wirtschaftsweg trifft es besser.
wermak (2022-12-15 23:06:13+00:00): Hi xDeamon

on these roads is no construction, so please change construction to proposed.

Thanks.
dvdzero (2023-02-22 13:33:47+00:00): Yes, same idea for me.
Seams there aren't any trace of works.
Diacritic (2021-11-14 05:44:18+00:00): Hi!

Why? These seem like transliterated names, which aren’t suitable for inclusion? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-05-19 16:32:01+00:00): Hi, "living streets" aren't usually named streets, I'm not sure why you named it Järveotsa.
praeteritum (2023-06-04 20:14:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136946972.
Layft Greater (2022-01-04 20:14:20+00:00): This does not look right. Should be "no_u_turn"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13422611/history
Bolt034 (2022-01-05 08:48:37+00:00): Hi, Layft Greater.
Thanks for noticing this error on my side 😅. I will correct it right now to "no_u_turn".
Bolt034 (2022-01-05 09:09:26+00:00): Thanks for your feedback. Please, check the changeset for an update https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115786793
Stereo (2023-06-27 14:33:53+00:00): Hi Rossch,

Do you maybe remember where you found the address of "22 Schullstrooss" for the FC Berdenia Berbourg stadium clubhouse? I can't find a trace of this address anywhere else.

Happy mapping,

Guillaume
rossch (2023-06-27 15:13:09+00:00): Hi Guillaume,

good, question, I'll ask the club because at this time I'm also unable to find my source.
Kha_nam (2021-11-10 05:49:59+00:00): Hi ASofia,
Trust you are doing well. I have fixed the validation errors at way 703776949  
Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113573827
Allison P (2021-11-11 05:58:56+00:00): Same thing here. While homes are still being put up the area should be tagged as construction.
MikeN (2021-11-09 21:14:58+00:00): Thank you for this edit.   What was the intended change?   It removed the building tag on the main office building and replaced it with landuse.   The entire complex was already marked as 'Millenium Apartment Homes'.
JackieMapping (2021-11-09 21:24:32+00:00): Thank you for your response. I was trying to show the area where the main building is like on Google Maps to be more specific for things that use OSM. I noticed the area around said Neighborhood. Perhaps it was unnecessary. Let me know if I should remove it or if you can update it, etc.
JackieMapping (2021-11-09 21:24:54+00:00): Perhaps my change was unecessary*
MikeN (2021-11-09 22:01:42+00:00): I restored the building and marked it as type of office.   It might be OK to add the building name such as rental office or club house; I'm not sure what its official name is.
JackieMapping (2021-11-09 22:04:03+00:00): Thank you for your assistance!
user_5359 (2021-11-09 17:41:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/841559006. The key "building:levels" count the level of a building above the ground. It is therefore a number. Please check the given value.
Futur3r (2021-11-12 19:39:34+00:00): Bonjour,

Faites attention de ne pas attacher les polygones de parking à la route.

Merci pour la contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113575455
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-11-10 04:15:17+00:00): Зачем? Вернул, как было.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113575547
Allison P (2021-11-11 05:56:37+00:00): This area should be marked as construction. Residential areas are already filled with homes, and this area is not. In fact, have the roads you updated actually been completed? They haven't been platted yet.
confusedbuffalo (2021-11-10 18:25:31+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding this.
Couple of things to watch out for:
Make sure you have spaces in postcodes (just like when you'd see it written).
There doesn't need to be an area and a point for a single feature.
Also please use a suitable description of the changes you've made when you save, to help others understand what you're mapping.
I've made a few fixes here, but thanks again for adding it and happy mapping!
OodlesOfNodels (2021-11-18 00:28:07+00:00): Hey owen minde, just a suggestion, if you are using the iD editor its good to use the "Q" key to square your buildings. Many of the buildings you drew are very mishapen.
UPegasus (2022-02-27 18:56:27+00:00): Як розуміти цю дику абревіатуру?
PT-53 (2021-11-11 10:14:04+00:00): Hallo Christian,
Du hast diesen Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1000874169/history
neu eingezeichnet und mit den Merkmalen
name=Feldweg an der ....
highway=path
surface=dirt
versehen.

Das Merkmal name ist nur für echte Eigennamen vorgesehen:
Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Dein Eintrag "Feldweg an der ... " ist kein Eigenname und sollte daher wieder gelöscht werden.

Du hast den Weg als Path klassifiziert. Path steht für einen einen spurigen Weg (z.B. für Fußgänger und Radfahrer)
Wenn dort aber 2-spurige Fahrzeuge wie z.B. Traktoren fahren können und auch dürfen, wäre wohl Track die passende Einstufung.
Wiki:
- Path: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath
- Track: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack

Falls es sich um einen Track (Feldweg) handelt sollgte auch noch das Merkmal tracktyp ergänzt werden.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype
PT-53 (2021-11-28 11:56:03+00:00): Hallo Christian, 
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Christian Wehle (2021-11-29 09:45:45+00:00): Hey PT-53, 
vielen Dank für die wertvollen Hinweise. Ich habe sie soeben umgeändert und werde sie fortan beachten.
Viele Grüße,
Christian Wehle
PT-53 (2021-11-29 10:10:49+00:00): Hallo Christian, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung und Bereinigung.
Grüße
aweech (2021-11-10 13:33:12+00:00): Hi,
We don't add addresses to sheds and other outbuildings, just for the main building at a residence.
18Lub06bik92 (2021-11-11 21:06:28+00:00): Kolej Cislo 3 je Spojene a Spolu = Vyjazd/Odjet
user_18570134 (2023-03-01 14:10:59+00:00): Nice work here.
TT_Chili_King (2023-03-01 14:12:27+00:00): Careful with your abbreviations Captain!
Captain_America_802 (2023-03-01 14:14:46+00:00): I will be more careful moving forward. Thank you!
Johnbo (2022-01-16 19:39:49+00:00): Hola. Ya que pareces conocer la zona, ¿podrías revisar este restaurante que está sospechosamente colocado sobre un cruce? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2883819001#map=18/37.68108/-1.68716

El usuario que lo creó metió bastantes restaurantes incorrectos, así que me gustaría que alguien local pudiera confirmarlo o borrarlo, según proceda. Muchas gracias.
jgfut (2022-01-17 16:36:50+00:00): Hola, ese ese lugar no hay ninguna casa Manolo, en la "Plaza del Pueblo Saharaui" que es lo más cercano estan "El Forno", "Ñampa Zampa" y "Pedro's Pizza", además de las cafeterías "París" y "Masai".

Como "Casa MAnolo" no me suena ningún restaurante en Lorca, que podría existir, pero donde marac en el mapa no está
Johnbo (2022-01-21 10:57:21+00:00): Muchas gracias por confirmármelo. Procedo a borrarlo. Un saludo.
SimonPoole (2021-11-19 11:50:06+00:00): Das war, sagen wir mal "suboptimal". Bitte das nächste mal bevor du grossflächig etwas änderst, zuerst nachforschen/fragen. Siehe auch http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/2021-November/011335.html