piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
DaveF (2021-01-20 02:53:37+00:00): Hi 
Don't delete valid data.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6606087122
stthomse (2021-02-01 09:44:15+00:00): Apologies this was accidental.
GartenStuhl (2021-01-20 06:57:27+00:00): da review_requested
Da ich mich vor Ort nicht auskenne, bin ich mir nicht sicher ob dort nicht mehr Gebäude stehen?
Falls Ja, und die Punkte richtig gesetzt sind, könnte man diese noch hinzufügen.
Ansonsten würde ich die Punkte der Adressen (13, 15c, 15a) jeweils "in" die Gebäude Umrisse verschieben.
Den Amenity-Tag könnte man auch noch vergeben ("Was ist es?"), z.B. Tierheim, Tierzucht, Tierpension, etc.
Ansonsten siehts gut aus.
GartenStuhl (2021-02-19 05:33:54+00:00): wurde angepasst in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97857918
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
limes11 (2021-03-03 22:18:47+00:00): Hi,

da du hier vor kurzem das Gesamtgewicht eingetragen hast: Auf 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166044594

ist dies als 1.5 Tonnen erfasst. Kann ich kaum glauben. Weisst du zufaellig, ob das stimmt?

VG, Limes
rosenthal-ff (2021-03-04 06:20:56+00:00): Ich glaube auch nicht das dieses Gewicht richtig ist. Oben an der Hütte stand für die Abfahrt ins Elmsteiner Tal das Schild mit dem Gesamtgewicht für 2,8t. Da ich aber auf dem Stück hinauf keine acht auf ein solches Schild hatte, kann ich es dir nicht sagen, aber klingt absolut falsch.

MFG
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
bradrh (2023-01-15 00:11:37+00:00): Hi,  When you add tracks like this from imagery & usgs topo's, it would be very nice if you looked at the MVUM and added the motor_vehicle access tags also.  Most, or all of these are closed to motor vehicles.  thx
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
limes11 (2021-01-19 14:49:20+00:00): Hallo 

Danke fuer die Aufklaerung. Ich habe die Tags mal ein wenig vereinfacht, das ging etwas drunter und drueber. Du kannst es dir ja noch einmal ansehen und dich melden, falls etwas nicht passt.

VG, Limes
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Alecs01 (2021-01-19 18:03:20+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap. Per indicare che lì si trova una pista ciclabile, devi tracciare un percorso parallelo alla strada che costeggia (se sono fisicamente separabile) oppure assegnare i tag cycleway=* alla strada stessa se è solo una corsia, vedi qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Biciclette sovrapporre i due percorsi è un errore
snow_21 (2021-01-20 09:22:38+00:00): Ciao, grazie mille per la spiegazione cerco pian piano di imparare. Saluti
snow_21 (2021-01-20 09:27:08+00:00): Non riesco a cancellare la ciclabile segnata in modo errato, come posso procedere?
Alecs01 (2021-01-20 19:23:54+00:00): Fatto ora
pitfire (2021-01-19 13:03:35+00:00): Neubau vor Ort ermitteln oder auf neuere NRW Geo Luftaufnahmen warten.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-19 13:19:40+00:00): 1643 budynków w ciągu dwóch minut, czy w jakikolwiek sposób sprawdzasz co dodajesz?
GinaroZ (2021-01-20 22:39:59+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits. However I've had to remove the descriptive names you added like "Farm Track" as these are not needed. I've also changed the Campsie Fells back to heath as it's not a park.
Any questions let me know :)
charl3s (2021-08-15 14:37:07+00:00): Chyba tag construction dla S11 jeszcze niepotrzebny
richlv (2021-02-22 20:16:36+00:00): Hi, thank you for the recent map improvements in Latvia (which also includes at least Bolt002, 009 and 010).
In https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activites/Bolt , it is stated that "We are constantly in contact with the local community through the local talk list", but there does not seem to be any recent communication on this in the talk-lv mailing list.

Is there some thread I have missed there?
Bolt001 (2021-02-23 05:41:42+00:00): Hey, thank you for your comments. We have sent a message to talk-lv@openstreetmap.org on Feb 3, but had no response. I'm afraid it wasn't approved by moderators. So far the talk-lv is the only contact channel we could find for Latvian community. Please let me know if you have other comm channels.
richlv (2021-04-22 17:47:59+00:00): Hi, I asked around - indeed, non-subscriber messages to talk-lv are dropped (as majority of them is spam anyway).
You are correct, talk-lv is the main communication channel for Latvia.
May I suggest to subscribe to the list, and post again? That way the message will go through, and you will be less likely to miss any responses.
Bolt001 (2021-04-26 06:00:24+00:00): Hey richlv, thank you for the comment. I have subscribed to the talk list and sent a message once more!
richlv (2021-04-26 10:55:02+00:00): Wonderful, thank you so much :)
ortho_is_hot (2021-01-27 14:32:15+00:00): Hi, I've just shifted back the crossing at Glenayr Avenue since the imagery is a bit out of date and they've relocated the crossing a bit to the south (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/874056066)

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
mitchelldm (2021-01-27 23:41:19+00:00): Hi, thank you that's my mistake!
Cheers,
Mitch
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-19 13:18:44+00:00): Dodałeś 1128 budynków w ciągu minuty.

Proszę, zaprzestań dodawania ich na ślepo bez weryfikacji.
RicoElectrico (2021-01-19 13:22:46+00:00): Na forum dodoelk znalazł przykład niesprawdzonych budynków - https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=815715#p815715 .

Pisałem kilkanaście godzin temu pod inną Twoją edycją, ale zignorowałeś moją uwagę.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-19 13:26:21+00:00): https://github.com/openstreetmap-polska/gugik2osm/issues/57
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-19 13:26:59+00:00): @RicoElectrico Masz pomysł jak znaleźć osoby które mogły by to konto zablokować?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-19 13:28:26+00:00): W sensie sprawnie, w ciągu 5 minut wrzucił 2055 budynków. Jak się to zablokuje to będzie mniej roboty z wycofaniem zmian.
RicoElectrico (2021-01-19 13:46:41+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny - Póki co dałem blokadę 0h która wymaga jej przeczytania. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4694
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-19 14:00:50+00:00): A, czyli to był skrypt. 

Ciekawe czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Kaczor nowe konto założył.
RicoElectrico (2021-01-19 14:03:57+00:00): @Mateusz Konieczny - Nie sądzę. Porównaj http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Piotr_J oraz http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Kaczor

Nie wiem skąd ustaliłeś że to skrypt, chyba że masz na myśli budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl
Cristoffs (2021-01-19 14:12:53+00:00): Nie wiem czy to skrypt, ale czas jak szybko dodaje oznacza, że nie ma walidacji po między pobraniem a dodaniem do osm. Czyli pobiera i dodaje bez pobrania danych z osm do warstwy - nie ma więc nawet możliwości weryfikacji automatycznej.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-19 14:18:17+00:00): @RicoElectrico - masz rację, nie ma podstaw podejrzewać że jest to jedna osoba
ndm (2021-01-19 19:23:04+00:00): You need to adjust your imagery to match the current map rather than just drawing outside of the parking area.
eggie (2021-01-19 14:03:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Feedback:  Wanneer dit een paadje is dat door gebruik is ontstaan dan taggen we highway=path  
path=desire
Paden met een bord  wandelpad (G7)  zijn natuurlijk wel highway=footway
bicycle=no hoeft er dan niet bij. 
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
cmmens (2021-01-19 14:12:36+00:00): Bedankt voor het welkomsbericht!

Ik heb je feedback ook meteen verwerkt. Ik zal in het vervolg het vinkje voor review aanzetten.
eggie (2021-01-19 14:14:42+00:00): Top!
Denk ook inderdaad highway=path

Mapse,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Vinber-Pro (2021-01-19 13:24:11+00:00): connais tu le téléphone de institu harmonie
AlixGueguen (2021-01-19 13:29:18+00:00): je ne sais pas
Piskvor (2021-01-19 17:13:01+00:00): To zní nepravděpodobně...není to spíš surface=asphalt?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
frosm (2021-02-10 17:32:28+00:00): 741 bandes de circulations c'est un peu trop https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304430665 :)
qu'avez-vous voulu dire ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
dudnickiy (2021-01-21 23:40:30+00:00): Для чего настраиваете запреты маневров на этих перекрестках? Там нет знаков запрета. Там знак 3.2. По этой улице могут проезжать автобусы, инвалиды, люди проживающие в домах в пределах действия знака. Не нужно ставить запреты в таких случаях.
any1ne (2021-01-22 02:36:58+00:00): Добрый день. Там до меня вся улица в пределах квартала была под запретом. В связи с чем, мой навигатор строил маршрут через служебную территорию сбербанка. Вот я и начал эксперименты, периодически выгружая участок. Исправлю. Спасибо
dudnickiy (2021-01-22 12:44:22+00:00): Это естественно, через эту территорию обычным легковым авто собственно ездить и нельзя. Знак не позволяет. Но можно автобусам, инвалидам и т.д. Тут проблема не в том что Чичерина закрыта, а а том, что закрытая территория сбербанка открыта для проезда. Поставьте на этой территории сбера тег "access: no" для легковых авто.
dudnickiy (2021-01-22 12:45:04+00:00): Либо скиньте некорректный рассчет маршрута скриншотом мне на почту dudnickiy.lv@gmail.com
any1ne (2021-01-22 12:51:48+00:00): Я это уже понял. Нарисовал забор и ворота с признаком private. Это же правильно? По крайней мере на деле так и есть. Но выгрузки еще небыло
Ropino (2021-01-20 13:06:36+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du die Straße "Einerstraße" und Teile der "Vinnstraße" mit diesem Changeset gelöscht?
Sind diese nicht mehr vorhanden? Das will ich nicht wirklich glauben.
VG Ropino
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2021-01-19 14:24:17+00:00): Dag Ribin.. Geef steeds concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan. andere lokale mappers willen dat graag weten.
Woningen die gereed zijn kun je ook ontdoen van de regel construction=house. Dus die regel ook weghalen.
Heet het hele buurtje Wilgenwold. Dat aantal inwoners kun je beter verwijderen. Dat zal niet kloppen. 
Tip.. Let op dat je de paden niet aan de landuse plakt. Goed inzoomen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-19 14:58:20+00:00): Robin In OSM voegen we geen adressen toe aan gebouwomtrekken. Er zijn al adresnodes.
Het adres zal ik verwijderen.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-01-19 15:00:34+00:00): BAG data hersteld.. adres nr 5 verwijderd
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:57:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2021-01-19 14:17:51+00:00): Klopt!
mapse
eggie
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-11 17:44:10+00:00): le tag name ne doit pas servir à décrire, Parking n'est pas un nom :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97774875
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-01-21 00:31:26+00:00): Boa noite,

Pode justificar a alteração deste topónimo sff?

Cumps,

Nuno Caldeira
Mónica Andreia Gouveia Caldeira (2021-01-21 10:22:04+00:00): Bom dia Nuno,
Toda aquela área pertence ao sítio do Arco Pequeno. Não existe nenhum sítio com o nome Arco Pequeno de Cima.
Cumprimentos,
Mónica Caldeira
ndm (2021-01-19 15:20:46+00:00): It’s planned by the council but the responsible developer is not proposing to build it. Should be deleted. 

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/incredibly-frustrating-delay-50m-bristol-4870185
Nathan_A_RF (2021-01-19 16:03:21+00:00): It is definitely proposed and has been for years otherwise the motorway junction would never have been built. The owners of the land won't build it yet is the only thing, hence it is not under construction but proposed.
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-20 09:38:07+00:00): Hi alkushi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
eggie (2021-01-19 15:01:30+00:00): Top!
DDROMAGNY (2021-03-17 08:59:32+00:00): Bonjour, 
Serait-il possible de préciser si ce parking est en surface, combien de places il peut contenir, s'il y a une place PMR et s'il est payant ? 
(surface=yes/no ; capacity=... ; wheelchair = yes/no ; fee=yes/no)
#CDT40
Céline cor (2021-03-17 09:49:23+00:00): Bonjour, je n'habite pas mimizan ... ce parking a été créé lors de notre formation OSM . Vous pouvez bien sûr apporter ces éléments si vous en disposez
DDROMAGNY (2021-03-22 14:01:54+00:00): Pas de soucis, je contact la personne de l'OT de Mimizan !
Arun Madhavan (2021-01-19 15:03:57+00:00): HI I see some issue with the mapping, you should not draw woods inside woods.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97776277
VISHNU K C (2021-01-19 15:09:36+00:00): While writing address name it using both capital and small letters and since the building is quite visible avoid using point feature and mark it as an area if you have sufficient knowledge about the surrounding.....Happy mapping....
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97776372
VISHNU K C (2021-01-19 15:09:41+00:00): While writing address name it using both capital and small letters and since the building is quite visible avoid using point feature and mark it as an area if you have sufficient knowledge about the surrounding.....Happy mapping....
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97776372
Patchanka (2021-02-04 11:14:23+00:00): bonjour
en même temps que supprimer le doublon, vous avez déplacé le parking vélo au milieu de l'espace vert. Était-ce souhaité ? Ca me parait bizarre, mais je ne suis pas allée sur place...
Clotildebisca (2021-02-04 11:20:40+00:00): Bonjour Patchanka,
Merci pour votre message, en effet c'est une erreur de ma part
Patchanka (2021-02-04 16:11:19+00:00): merci pour votre réponse. J'ai remis le parking vélos au bon endroit.
bonne soirée
DP24PH (2021-01-19 14:57:15+00:00): This includes fixes on the entry ramp from E1/AH26/R-8/NLEx to E2/MMSkyway and Libis Baesa combined. The area of uncertainty for the curvature to Tullahan River is at a mild error and may correct in further edits.
Let's always remember to be safe, be well, stay sane and dry, and you are loved.

DP24
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-05 14:08:47+00:00): Bonjour,
je rejoins le retour ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97776701

La question de l'utilité des données n'est pas la "bonne" question, mais plutôt "Est-ce que les arbres sont là ou pas ?"
Si les arbres ne sont pas présents alors on les enlève, si ils sont présents alors on les laisse :)
Cela concerne vraisemblablement aussi ce groupe de modifications : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97776750

à bientôt
Patchanka (2021-02-19 18:04:12+00:00): bonjour
je viens d'annuler le changeset pour "replanter" les arbres.
(suite à discussion ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98691543)
bonne soirée
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-11 17:39:22+00:00): Bonjour,
idem données inutiles ? est-ce sur le terrain ou pas ?
Peut-être prendre contact avec Caole ou Corinne du cdt pour échanger autour d'osm ?
au plaisir
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97776750
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-02-04 00:37:53+00:00): Bonjour,

Qu'est-ce que exactement une 'colliery-tip'? C'est specifique pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8338933026/history
Jay Jon (2021-02-06 14:38:52+00:00): Bonjour,

Oui, ce sont d'anciens déblais (une halde, un terril) issus de l'exploitation d'une mine d'or. Cette mine est désaffectée, il m'a donc semblé que c'était adéquat :
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/25244/how-to-tag-a-disused-colliery-tip

Qu'en pensez-vous ?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-01-27 22:59:53+00:00): Lucas de onde você tirou a geometria de várias vias neste changeset? Estão totalmente fora da geometria, excessivamente retas, acho que isso não colabora muito. Exemplo aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8338965719
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-01-30 14:25:44+00:00): Trechos totalmente sem qualidade excluidos. Deixem os que tinham uma margem minima de proximidade com a realidade.
vorpalblade (2021-01-22 18:38:48+00:00): Just to clarify, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmobile_home indicates that `shop=mobile_home` is for "[a] place that primarily sells mobile- or manufactured-homes, which are intended to be permanently, or semi-permanently, located in one spot."

You changed this to `shop=motorhome`, which is a little-used tag. And poorly documented (mostly as a redirect to `shop=caravan`).

I'm going to change this back in a few days, absent a better comment than "mobile_home -> motorhome".

Thanks,
vorpalblade
mueschel (2021-01-22 18:54:50+00:00): Well, there is some discrepancy of tags here it seems.

The category of vehicles is called "motorhome", documented and used >2000 times.  See, e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

I have never seen the Wiki page you linked before, and I'm very sure this tag was never discussed on the mailing list or even formally proposed. 
In fact, the page was edited by one user who is well known for introducing tags in this way.

So, the current "established" tagging scheme would be to use 'motorhome:sales',  and shop=mobile_home
That's inconsistent naming, but matches the discussed / accepted tagging schemes.
vorpalblade (2021-01-22 19:09:00+00:00): OK. Then why did you change `shop=mobile_home` to `shop=motorhome` (both tag pages were created by Fizzie41), if `shop=mobile_home` is part of the discussed/accepted tagging schemes?

Just in case there is a language barrier (UK English -> US English and vice versa is bad enough), this location sells `building=static_caravan` and prefrabricated `building=house`. It does not sell vehicles.
mueschel (2021-01-22 19:42:54+00:00): I changed it, because I assumed it to be a mistake - as I said, I never saw this tag before, neither in the data, nor in the Wiki. 
I usually check for tags in Taginfo, but in the list of occurrences of 'mobile_home' I didn't spot the 18 shop=mobile_home somewhere on the third page. 
The in-depth research I did only after your comment.

It would be really helpful if you could create a Key:mobile_home Wiki page, with the sub-tags suggested on shop=mobile_home. We should highlight that one tag is for vehicles and the other for "buildings on wheels" that are not for regular transport.