piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2014-12-17 20:59:37+00:00): @pyrog for info, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1292129589/history has already had a mechanical edit to "entrance" reverted by the data working group a couple of years ago.  Part of the changeset comment made at that time - says "please note that 'deprecated' does not mean we want you to auto-edit world-wide".  Did you not see this when you examined the objects that you changed?
aseerel4c26 (2014-12-17 21:24:39+00:00): @DaCor: it is just the often-used "iterative refinement" (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like#Syntactic_conventions_for_new_tags ). It is an amenity of type shop. Which type of shop? - Blafoo. We have no fixed tagging rules. So this could be used. And if we decide that this is rally crap, maybe because shops just fall out of what amenities are, then this may fine too. But this needs to be discussed before. This did not happen here. And in addition, here were several (partly unclear or half-manually done) edit types merged in one mass edit. That's not good to clearly see what has been changed.

Our mass edit guidelines are quite clear that this should be reverted.  Otherwise it will  get usual that people just do mass edits (with poor documentation and concept) and ask never.
DaCor (2014-12-17 21:41:27+00:00): aseerel, I think you are confusing a few different issues here.
aseerel4c26 (2014-12-18 00:47:19+00:00): @DaCor: would be nice if you could name them. ;-)
pyrog (2014-12-18 05:48:25+00:00): @aseerel4c26

> Do you mean those "fixme" boxes at the bottom?
Yes

>It seems you have misunderstood them.
Probably, english is not my native language ;-)
pyrog (2014-12-18 05:59:45+00:00): > A discussion before such an edit is required to make sure that such an edit is really wanted by the community 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy#Discuss

One problem with OSM is that there is to much information, everywhere, probably even for native english language peoples.

What is clear and obvious for you, is not — perhaps — for others ;-)
aseerel4c26 (2014-12-18 13:51:51+00:00): @pyrog: regarding the fixme boxes: In the meantime I have added a hopefully clear advice there. :-)  Regarding too much information: yes, I know.
aseerel4c26 (2014-12-18 14:19:39+00:00): It seems this changeset was reverted in the meantime (at 17 Dec 2014 21:40:00 by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27540041 )
Diomas (2014-12-17 11:49:29+00:00): Вместо названия "сарай" (в название здания обычно пишут названия вроде "Зимний дворец"),  лучше выберать подходящее значение для тега building:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building

Для сарая вполне подойдет building=shed
GerdP (2015-11-11 20:16:11+00:00): please review:
what does oneway=* mean on a node?
Maybe you wanted to map the corresponding
traffic_sign?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/992966419 
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign
Polyglot (2014-12-16 22:30:58+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contributions to HOT. I've changed a few things, turned the road network into a routable grid. Added some waterways where the trees are a bit greener and 'meandering'. I added an orchard where the trees are planted in rows. I'd also use 10-12 nodes for the huts. Now it looks a bit like a beehive.
saintam1 (2014-12-18 23:55:58+00:00): Привет, Santaclash,

Промених бул. Панчо Владигеров от път с две платна на път с едно платно, защото ми се струва, че така е в съответствие с приетата норма. Ако съм в грешка, се извинявам, но мисля, че тези пътища ги макрираме с две платна само ако има физически разграничител между тях, например стена, трева, т.е., ако чисто и просто е невъзможно кола да завие в обратна посока. Но ме поправете, ако греша.

Също така ми се стори, че сателитният образ от Bing не беше подравнен с GPS следите, забелязах, че пътят не беше коригиран с няколко метра.

Но ако наистина смятате, че е правилно да се маркират с две платна, ще се радвам на обратна връзка и ще го коригирам.
will_p (2014-12-16 22:27:40+00:00): I forgot to update the changeset comment, should have been:  
Fixed turn restrictions on Queens Road East / University Boulevard junction
Cassioandro (2014-12-16 23:55:09+00:00): All changes are cross checked from sehirrehberi.ibb.gov.tr(the municipality gis maps) and google earth. I also live in Taksim and these are basically the new scheme of the area. Any details that would advance the scheme would be appreciated.
Cassioandro (2014-12-16 23:56:46+00:00): Also I forgot to mention that I am also an urban planner. I know these areas since the beginning of 2000.
trigpoint (2014-12-17 13:00:18+00:00): Does this path http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317593553 really go through the water?
Actually the pond doesn't match bing very well.
Are there really 2 paths 2 the south of the pond, if so what separates them?
UI Guy (2014-12-17 00:47:50+00:00): Removed buildings that have been demolished in preparation for new 1201 Tennessee developement (by AGI/Avant Capital).
UI Guy (2014-12-17 01:12:08+00:00): That should be AGI Capital/AVANT  ( http://agiavant.com/projects/1201Tennessee http://www.fougeron.com/tennessee.php )
UI Guy (2014-12-17 00:48:28+00:00): Removed buildings that have been demolished in preparation for new 1201 Tennessee developement (by AGI/Avant Capital).
muralito (2014-12-17 21:31:57+00:00): El tema de como etiquetar las estaciones de tren hay que revisarlo. En el contexto de OSM las "railway=station" son para servicio de pasajeros, y con la desactivacion casi completa de los servicios que hubo en Uruguay la unica que queda es la que va de Central a 25 de Agosto. Creo que tener marcadas o marcar el resto como servicio de pasajeros es algo que da para malas interpretaciones. Una "estacion" en este nuevo contexto no es mucho mas que un edificio.
EkiZ (2014-12-17 22:55:20+00:00): Entiendo; lo dejo como estaba antes.
ika-chan! UK-USA (2014-12-21 16:34:23+00:00): Regent Street is already mapped very well. Not that it's a bad thing, but duplicate ways for the same street can cause inconsistencies. However, I id move the lane data, adjusted for the existence of bus lanes to http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27612575. For lanes=*, we count the total number of lanes, rather than just the ones that normal cars can use.
Harry Wood (2015-05-12 19:40:15+00:00): Want to join in some mapping in this area? We can show some of the details we're adding. Check out this event happening tomorrow night in Marylebone: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/London#Upcoming_Events
ika-chan! UK-USA (2014-12-21 16:38:38+00:00): Sadly I could not keep way 317610591, v1, because unlike way 317610579, v1 and the plausible lane information sans bus lanes, it had no new information and it basically duplicated an existing road on the way.
d1g (2015-12-08 19:08:04+00:00): admin_level=0? a tagging mistake?
GerdP (2015-11-11 14:47:03+00:00): please explain:
what does 
oneway=yes;reversible
mean?
You produced this tag by merging two
ways to this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124658727
GerdP (2015-11-11 14:53:55+00:00): just noted that user chachafish "Finished with OSM" so I changed the tag to oneway=reversible
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-06 15:37:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3238945097/history - what you have meant by nature=water here?
naoliv (2014-12-17 09:44:21+00:00): A lan house só aceita bitcoin de pagamento?
Nakaner (2015-02-21 22:11:47+00:00): Nur als Hinweis für dich: Diverse Listen vom RMV dürfen nicht für OSM verwendet werden (es gibt keine Erlaubnis, deren Inhalte in OSM zu übernehmen). Ich habe den Namen soeben auf "Frankfurt Frankfurter Berg" umbenannt, da sie vor Ort so beschildert ist. (We map what's on the ground)
kaltuna (2015-02-22 04:25:12+00:00): Hi, okay danke für die Info. Erstens wundert mich dann, warum sie ihre Haltestellen im Fahrplan anders benennen, als in der Realität und zweitens: gibt es das mit RMV auch irgendwo nachzulesen ? Um welche Listen handelt es sich dabei ? Gruß !
SomeoneElse (2014-12-17 20:54:11+00:00): This looks suspiciously like an undiscussed mechanical edit.  See http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy for what should happen before any mechanical edits take place.  The most important step is "discuss" - can you point me to where, if anywhere, this happened?

Perhaps it's worth reiterating why the mechanical edit policy and the requirement to discuss exists.  Even if, in a particular example, "shop=yes" is more correct than a previous "amenity=shop".  

One reason is that the mappers using the previous version won't know that a tag is "wrong" unless you tell them - they'll just continue adding more "amenity=shop" to the database.  Any data consumer that is looking for generic shops will need to look for both "amenity=shop" (since new ones will still be added) and "shop=yes", so their work is still the same.  The OSM database is slightly larger, so it's a little harder to manage for everyone.  So the net effect is that everyone has to work a little harder, and you've wasted your time.

Another reason is that there might be people actually looking for "amenity=shop" in the database (it's entirely possible; they may know the context in which they were added and you may not).  If they're rendering these they will be surprised when they disappear from their map.  If the mechanical edit had been discussed first, they'd know that they now need to look for "shop=yes" and wouldn't have a nasty surprise.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (on behalf of the OSM data working group)
aseerel4c26 (2014-12-18 14:13:12+00:00): I had told the user six hours BEFORE this edit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27515219 about automated edits. Apparently this was not understood at this time.
aseerel4c26 (2014-12-18 14:20:56+00:00): It seems this changeset was reverted in the meantime (at 17 Dec 2014 21:40:00 by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27540041 )
pyrog (2014-12-18 17:32:38+00:00): @Andy

So what should I do know ?

* send an email to all users that add the tag amenity=shop ?
* reverse the changeset ?

What should I do in the feature ?
Ok, I will read carefully read the french version of Mechanical_Edit_Policy…

But after, talk to the community don't mean talk to every mappers ?

A lot(?) of basic users don't even know mailing list, so how could they learn that they shouldn't use theses tags ?

This changeset touch only 358 objects (massive edition ?).

May be it could be more efficient to send a message to all theses users (probably less than 358) ?

Best regards,

Yves
pyrog (2014-12-18 17:34:58+00:00): Oups:

What should I do in the future ? 
…
Ok, I will read carefully Mechanical_Edit_Policy.

Unfortunatly, There is no french translation of this page.
Marián Kyral (2014-12-17 09:50:23+00:00): Ahoj,
jsi si jistý, že celá ta plocha AutoHerc je opravdu budova? Nevím o tom, že by se tam stavělo.
koumes74 (2014-12-30 13:58:04+00:00): Ten objekt jsem nevytvářel já, ale někdo jiný... jedná se o oplocený areál autobazaru, je tam jen budka prodejce. Vypnul jsem "Buildings". Nevím, zda je to tak správně, když tak to prosím oprav. Děkuji.
gileri (2014-12-17 09:50:57+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai corrigé les horaires d'ouverture et enlevé les informations sur l'adresse qui sont redondantes avec le nœud "38" déjà présent au nord du batiment. 

Pour les horaires d'ouverture il faut suivre la norme expliquée ici : 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours
L'outil suivant est sympa pour voir d'éventuelles erreurs dans les valeurs :
http://ypid.de/~osm/evaluation_tool/

Ces conventions sont nécessaires pour permettre à des programmes d'afficher et de traiter correctement les horaires d'ouvertures.
Johnny Mapperseed (2017-01-14 16:31:01+00:00): Please don't make edits based on how other maps do things. Make your edits based on your local understanding of things.
eggie (2018-02-21 09:42:24+00:00): Na jaren weer gaan mappen. daarom.. opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Nakaner (2014-12-20 19:18:44+00:00): Könntest du beim Editieren von Buslinien nebenbei die Abkürzungen der Betreiber und Verkehrsverbünde durch ihre Langform ersetzen? Du kennst ja den OSM-Grundsatz, alles auszuschreiben. Derzeit kann man z.B. in den OSM-Daten noch nicht den AVV und den AVV (Aachen vs. Augsburg) oder den VGN und den VGN auseinander halten. Ich mache das gerade in Baden-Württemberg.
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-12-17 23:44:02+00:00): Proszę dodawać informację o miejscowości do każdego adresu.
gm-bremen (2014-12-19 12:57:16+00:00): cycleway=optional ist kein offizielles Tag.
gm-bremen (2014-12-19 12:58:03+00:00): cycleway=optional ist kein offizielles Tag.
gm-bremen (2014-12-19 12:58:56+00:00): cycleway=optional ist kein offizielles Tag.
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-12-17 23:51:39+00:00): Proszę zapoznać się z prawidłowym sposobem tagowania adresów: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
528491 (2014-12-28 07:23:56+00:00): Tại sao bạn lại xóa hết thẻ của hồ Bà Hào?
Lê Thanh Quang (2015-04-18 14:44:09+00:00): Xin lỗi, chắc tôi xóa nhầm
Fritura (2018-11-03 23:55:06+00:00): Beste Pptje, 

Benrsteineiland en Gershwineiland zijn ontoegankelijk en nog niet aangelegd.
Dit zal wellicht in de toekomst wel het geval zijn maar voor nu is het onjuist. Ik zal beide wegen daarom aanpassen naar construction. Gr. Fritura
naoliv (2014-12-17 11:09:09+00:00): alantygel, por favor, evite ficar testando com objetos que não existem no mapa.
alantygel (2014-12-17 11:34:30+00:00): certo, mas achei que tinha apagado o ponto! ele está ativo?
naoliv (2014-12-17 11:36:53+00:00): Sim, estava. Eu acabei de removê-lo.
Caso você queira fazer testes, existe um servidor para isso: http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Você precisa criar uma conta nele.
As imagens, no entanto, não são atualizadas.
k1wi (2014-12-20 16:23:18+00:00): I reverted this changeset. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27591856
paz (2014-12-19 11:47:18+00:00): Can be corroborated by streetview: https://goo.gl/maps/nGIYG
Tiumf (2014-12-17 13:33:48+00:00): продукты
Tiumf (2014-12-17 14:46:51+00:00): медтехника
ViriatoLusitano (2014-12-18 12:38:57+00:00): Olá Marco, obrigado pelas contribuições, todas elas são 100% precisas!

Se tiveres qualquer dúvida manda-me uma PM ou ao utilizador Mazezito http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Mazezito.

Nós os dois somos de Famalicão, eu do centro e ele de Pedome, portanto é sempre bom ter mais um da região por cá.

Espero que fiques connosco durante muito tempo!
gm-bremen (2014-12-19 12:59:38+00:00): cycleway=optional ist kein offizielles Tag.
Tiumf (2014-12-19 13:18:32+00:00): Обводной канал на Северянку
4rch (2014-12-18 01:22:40+00:00): Da es schon mehrere Hinweise über beschädigte Grenzen gab, hier mal der Hinweis auf folgende Threads: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=28979
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=472091#p472091
eggie (2018-01-29 20:03:23+00:00): Na een hele tijd weer aan het mappen, maar nog niet zoveel edits.. daarom stuur ik je per PB  de welkomstmail met nuttige tips en links.
naoliv (2014-12-17 13:07:51+00:00): Udson, tanto a estrada que liga a chácara quanto ela estão sem nenhum tipo de classificação.
Chrisss Gü (2014-12-17 16:34:50+00:00): e zu building:part umgeändert
SomeoneElse (2015-01-04 12:55:51+00:00): The bounding box here is huge and the description suggests TIGER fixing only, yet http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115431481 is obviously not TIGER.  Could you please (a) use smaller changeset bounding boxes and (b) use meaningful changeset comments?
RichRico (2016-04-29 19:46:40+00:00): Thanks for the observation, I'll keep that in mind.
naoliv (2014-12-17 18:48:00+00:00): Diego, você traçou várias vias mas esqueceu de classificá-las como sendo ruas.
Diomas (2014-12-18 13:53:52+00:00): А этот временный проезд со стороны синопской как-то обозначен? Потому как разметка там проезд запрещает как и поворот с моста налево. И ДПС не зря там частенько пасётся за перекрестком.
yuryleb (2014-12-18 16:49:07+00:00): Ну я лично там не так давно проезжал, вроде бы знаки и уже сильно стершаяся разметка были. Хотя сейчас уже стал сомневаться, но точно помню, что неоднократно видел там машины, пересекающие площадь напрямик, когда стоял на светофоре перед переходом у Лавры. Знаки со стороны Синопской, конечно, с моста все по-прежнему, налево нельзя. Я там не стал мудрить с запретами, временный проезд и дороги моста пересекаются, но не разделены в точках пересечений - вроде как в таких случаях маршрутизация не должна разрешать повороты
yuryleb (2014-12-19 06:49:06+00:00): Да, все легально. Разметку, правда, я сегодня утром не очень разглядел, но со стороны Синопской наб. висят знаки движения по полосам (двум) - с правой направо, как раньше, и прямо, с левой прямо и можно  аж налево на мост. И что это я здесь так редко езжу? :-)
naoliv (2014-12-17 19:33:48+00:00): Regis, esses bairros separados que você está deixando não estão certos.
Essa área que fica entre eles acaba ficando sem nenhum bairro.
Além disso há muita duplicação e sobreposição de caminhos.
RegisAJ (2014-12-19 13:06:25+00:00): Deixei os bairros separados para poder editá-los com mais facilidade. A área entre eles é muito estreita, quase imperceptível, não há problema. Não há duplicação e sobreposição de caminhos.
5m4u9 (2014-12-18 10:28:20+00:00): para las canchas, parques, o áreas públicas nunca unir a las geometrías de las calles... eso no existe en la realidad.
anderfo (2016-08-24 12:28:25+00:00): Hei Vidar, ser at du har lagt inn mtb:type=downhill og mtb:name=* på endel stier her.

Vet du om noen som kunne fått lagt inn mtb:scale:imba på dem også?

Anders
zarl (2015-05-09 07:03:27+00:00): Hi!

Ein Kommentar wie der hier bei bikeavenue in der Lindenschmidtstrasse: 
closed "Saison ab 01.04. bis wann???"
gehört nicht in das Öffnungszeiten-Feld, für so etwas wäre ein "fixme=" oder eine "note=" besser.

Ich korrigiere das mal, die Zeiten haben sich eh geändert, scheint mir.
aseerel4c26 (2014-12-18 14:16:55+00:00): judging from the element counts and the timing this seems to be reverting https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27515219 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27522772 (both amenity=shop and similar)
naoliv (2014-12-18 09:53:33+00:00): Matheus, acho que você trocou sem querer a letra M pela N.
Está escrito "Fanevaço" enquanto que o correto parece ser "Famevaço"
matheusmoreira (2014-12-18 13:27:51+00:00): naoliv, você está correto. Irei corrigir. Obrigado por apontar o erro.
gm-bremen (2014-12-19 11:34:37+00:00): cycleway=facultative ist kein offizielles Tag.
gm-bremen (2014-12-19 14:30:52+00:00): Der separate Radweg (317738218) darf nicht von Spitzenkiel bis Sögestraße Wegesende heißen.
gm-bremen (2014-12-19 19:30:15+00:00): In der Mailingliste bittet Ulamm ...wäre es nett, wenn das richtige Benamsen jetzt jemand anders vornimmt.

Ich meine wenn wir es richtig, richtig machen wollen, muss nicht nur die Benennung geändert werden. Ich denke der Straßenname gehört nicht an den Radweg. Sondern die Realation zur jeweiligen Straße.
715371 (2014-12-20 00:11:04+00:00): Warum soll es da jetzt überhaupt einen eigenen Weg geben? Es gibt dort keine bauliche Trennung (kein Bordstein). Daher halte ich die Lösung von ulamm für nicht sinnvoll. cycleway=opposite_track beschreibt daher die Situation hier besser. Ich verstehe nicht, weshalb ulamm damit ein Problem hat.
ulamm (2014-12-20 11:03:20+00:00): Der ganze Straßenzug hat zwar nur niedrige Bordsteine, aber stattdessen die Poller-Reihen, die die Fahrbahn effektiver begrenzen, als volle Bordsteine es tun würden. Man sieht ja, dass dort nie ein Auto auf Gehweg oder Radweg parkt.
gm-bremen (2014-12-20 11:40:19+00:00): Den separaten Radweg wieder zu entfernen halte ich auch für die sauberste Lösung.
715371 (2014-12-20 12:52:52+00:00): Der separate weg ist also da, weil die Autos nicht auf den Fahrradweg fahren können? Das wäre ja auch bei cycleway=opposite_track nicht möglich und lanes=1 ist schon getaggt. Mehr muss man da aus meiner Sicht nicht taggen. Zu erfassen, dass man dort nicht parken kann halte ich nicht für sinnvoll/nötig.
gm-bremen (2014-12-20 13:12:41+00:00): Noch ein Fehler:
Von Spitzenkiel 16 nach Knochenhauerstraße 38 wird man als als Radfahrer über Am Wall geroutet (graphhopper.com/maps/).
ulamm (2014-12-20 15:39:37+00:00): Die Empfehlung von Graphhopper ist zwar unsinnig, aber der Nutzer erkennt den Fehler sofort und hat keine Schwierigkeit, daraus die richtige Route abzuleiten.
ulamm (2014-12-20 21:11:27+00:00): Hm – ich hatte einen anderen Fehler vermutet. Anscheinend ist der Radweg für den Router blockiert, weil ein Stück deckungsgleich mit der Grenzlinie der Fußgängerzone ist.
gm-bremen (2014-12-26 17:43:38+00:00): Einige Sachen geändert. Ist jetzt Änderungssatz: 27713132.
Nakaner (2015-01-17 15:20:38+00:00): Wenn die Poller in einen so großen Abstand stehen, dass ein Radfahrer (auch mit Kinderanhänger) gut durchkommt (solange er mit einem Winkel < 45° zur Straße durchfährt), ist das für mich keine bauliche Trennung.
ulamm (2015-01-17 20:32:01+00:00): Die Pollereihe verhindert effektiver, als ein normal hoher Bordstein dies täte, das Parken von Autos auf dem Radweg. Das ist im Innenstadtbereich ein wichtiges Qualitätsmerkmal.
5m4u9 (2014-12-18 05:48:30+00:00): respecto al comentario en hotosm, si... pero es porque las imágenes son muy antiguas... hubo en 2012 una colonización con asentamientos. Lástima que no sea visible :-(
dforsi (2014-12-18 20:50:36+00:00): Questo Cheapstore i mezzo alla strada mi sembra une errore e non c'è un'etichetta che dica che cosa è. Potresti trovare qualcosa di adatto su https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:shop
cadsauxk (2014-12-17 23:31:20+00:00): Comment should have been: revised mapping of Cardeal Mota, fixing highway classification, adjusting rivers, adding names from IBGE
trigpoint (2014-12-18 17:23:58+00:00): Who operates the ATM?
It should probably be attached to the building?
ShadyCraig (2014-12-19 08:51:15+00:00): Yes, it's a 'hole in the wall'.
I've attached it to the building now, see #27564786

I don't know who operates the ATM
trigpoint (2014-12-18 17:23:12+00:00): Who operates the ATM?
ShadyCraig (2014-12-19 08:43:51+00:00): The ATM is situated inside the One Stop convenience shop.
I don't know who operates it.
cserpell (2014-12-29 01:11:27+00:00): Hola Mauricio.

Uniste la calle Viana a través de la plaza de Viña, pero ésta sigue cortada producto de los trabajos de estacionamientos subterráneos. ¿Podrías revisar esto por favor?

Muchas gracias,
Cristián
SomeoneElse (2014-12-22 11:04:46+00:00): You've just made a number of edits to the top end of Crich (e.g. around http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32404191/history).  Unfortunately the Bing imagery here is significantly offset from reality (and that offset varies around the village).  Looking at the recent editors list some of the roads may have been offset before you started - but presumably you'll be wanting to "get it right".
naoliv (2014-12-18 09:51:52+00:00): Por que você colocou o nome de "danilo tavolaro" em um semáforo nos EUA?
SomeoneElse (2014-12-22 11:47:54+00:00): Is the name of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10170722/history near Bridgeport, Connecticut, USA really called "derga road"?
wakarii (2016-07-20 15:55:08+00:00): A nemzeti dohánybolt megszűnt.
floscher (2016-07-20 15:58:40+00:00): Which tobacco shop do you mean?

Melyik dohánybolt értesz?
wakarii (2016-07-20 16:01:12+00:00): Pont: Nemzeti dohánybolt (2420116815)
floscher (2016-07-20 16:12:44+00:00): I created a note at that location so that other mappers can verify this and update the map: http://osm.org/note/635199

If you want, you can also remove it yourself. It's not all that complicated: http://osm.org/edit?editor=id

━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

Csináltam egy feljegyzést ezen a helyen, hogy más térképkészítőkkel ellenőrizni tudja ezt, és frissíti a térképet: http://osm.org/note/635199

Ha azt szeretnénk, akkor is vegye ki magad. Ez nem olyan bonyolult: http://osm.org/edit?editor=id
Gehrke (2014-12-19 12:12:28+00:00): This changeset destroyed several boundaries, roads, transport relations and other stuff (especially around Bhf Zoo, Gedächtniskirche). I was not able to revert it. Thus, I tried to fix it partially.
Still a lot of work is needed. Since I am no local, i ask someone else to do it.