piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 00:39:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
chnav (2018-12-03 06:16:57+00:00): Здание одно, и лицей один. Внутреннее устройство (для девочек, для мальчиков, какие кафедры в университетах, какие у вас есть кабинеты  и т.д.) это не информация для ОСМ. Точки удалены. Спасибо.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:29:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
chnav (2018-12-03 06:19:06+00:00): Пожалуйста не пишите описание объекта в поле name, оно используется для настоящего названия. У нас правила тегирования отличаются от Викимапии. Спасибо.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:30:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
SK53 (2018-12-02 12:49:30+00:00): Sorry didn't change changeset: this was adding skiing & pitch to Plas y Brennin ski slope
Frans S (2018-12-02 18:14:29+00:00): Hi Boggedy
I am validating this task and see your mappings of highway=track. Please take another look because I think  a tag unclassified or residential is more appropriate
I know, it is always difficult to judge what tag to be used, but for a through going highway is track not the right one .
best regards
Frans S (2018-12-02 18:27:08+00:00): Hi, another thing.  In this task there is a beautiful GPS track to map a highway 
Do you download these tracks as well?
best regards
Boggedy (2018-12-02 18:34:26+00:00): Well. I would normally tag unclassified but this is on the west edge of a large national park so I am assuming it is not a through route. Were I to find that between 2 towns I would make it unclassifed but it is the 'edge' of the road network, so!
Boggedy (2018-12-02 18:34:50+00:00): I dont download gpx tracks no
Boggedy (2018-12-02 18:37:58+00:00): @Frans S . here you see I made the road unclassified as it is in the middle of the road network

https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/5234?task=163#bottom
santamariense (2018-12-02 17:39:12+00:00): É a mesma desta facebook.com/clubeamigosdosanimaissantamaria/ ??
Se sim, você pode adicionar o link como contact:facebook=*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65094556
Ashenzari (2018-12-02 19:25:20+00:00): É sim: diariosm.com.br/notícias/geral/domingo-é-dia-de-feira-de-adoção-na-praça-dos-bombeiros-1.2070278
É quem organiza a feira
SK53 (2018-12-08 12:02:58+00:00): I think this has been pointed out before: Freefone & local call numbers: 0385, 0845 are not reachable through international dialing. Therefore adding the international prefix is actually wrong: there are no such numbers. This is a typical problem when contributors make large scale search & replace type changes: lack of detailed consideration of edge cases.
confusedbuffalo (2018-12-10 18:06:13+00:00): I hadn't thought I'd added +44 to any 08 numbers, can you show me where I did?
SK53 (2018-12-10 21:23:53+00:00): On post boxes
OrionX (2018-12-21 15:15:54+00:00): Отлично!
Константин Гам (2018-12-05 09:58:17+00:00): Не надо изменять названия если вы не в курсе соглашения о наименованиях, спасибо!
532910 (2018-12-05 18:56:24+00:00): ok, согласен, тут был не прав
eggie (2018-12-02 20:28:04+00:00): Beste mapper. Realiseer je dat al je probeersels ook daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart komen.
Is dat je bedoeling?
verder ..Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Hansworst (2018-12-02 20:44:39+00:00): Hii, ik probeer het Balksterbosk zo goed mogelijk in kaart te brengen. 

Dit doe ik omdat het bos nog niet zichbaar is in Pokemon Go. Dit spel gebruikt OSM als kaart.
eggie (2018-12-02 20:48:31+00:00): Dat is allemaal prima want Balk wordt steeds beter (zolang als alles klopt), maar beste Hansworst waarom reageer je hier op een onzintag van hallo 123?
Groet,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-03 07:52:49+00:00): Het ziet er overigens nu wel netjes uit dat nieuwe gedeelte. Ik heb de landuse even laten aansluiten op het water. Daar zijn speciale tools voor in editor JOSM. 
Eggie
mavl (2018-12-25 00:22:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:16:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:03:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
dvdhoven (2018-12-02 15:11:09+00:00): rcn route 36-60 hersteld

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
GOwin (2018-12-05 01:49:23+00:00): Hello @norbertombueno, and welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM).

Thank you! Kudos for helping make  a better map of your favorite neighborhoods. OSM is a database of real-world features, used by many humanitarian and emergency service organizations. Fictional edits has no place in OSM. 

If you're keen to know more, there's this concise tips page for Philippine contributors: https://telegra.ph/Awesome-OSM-Tips--Tricks-01-28

Also, find out the latest happenings, or interact with local contributors through these community channels: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PH/channels

If you have any questions at all, please feel free to get in touch. You might be doubtful about a particular tag, or would like to clarify their use. Or perhaps, you have ideas you want to flesh out  to improve your neighbourhood map. Or maybe  just want to know more about OSM.  

Cheers,    

[GOwin](https://t.me/GOwin)
rjb4095 (2018-12-23 12:08:11+00:00): Noticed your edits at South Mountain. Did you intend to change several highway=track to power=line? Power lines render as a thin grey line with no name. If your mapping the road used to service the power lines by vehicle then use highway=track. If mapping a bike/foot path and no vehicles then use highway=path which includes horse, bike, and foot.

These ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247127091
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247125396
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255611907
mavl (2018-12-24 23:43:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Frans S (2018-12-14 18:35:25+00:00): Hello, I review mapped tasks and have a remark. Please map residential areas as
landuse=residential instead of place=village
Thank you for mapping
Frans S (2018-12-14 19:27:18+00:00): Hi, another point. I see that you mapped a number of objects, (waterways etc ) twice.
No idea how you manage that, but please pay attention to that.
You also don't connect always nodes of a waterway to each other. (they must snap, a small gap is not allowed)
Best regards
mavl (2018-12-25 00:24:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pio2_122 (2018-12-02 13:59:42+00:00): Jeśli już poprawiasz, to całościowo: droga jest asfaltowa, a nadal oznaczona jako nieutwardzona.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:36:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-12-02 21:08:16+00:00): ... Beste.. Is dit precies de vorm van de parkeerplaats?
Mod - BNV Mobility (2018-12-03 13:14:20+00:00): Volgens mij is dit een vrij getrouwe weergave van de vorm van de parkeerplaats. De wegen die rondom de parkeerplaats liggen kloppen volgens mij niet helemaal.
eggie (2018-12-03 13:21:20+00:00): Beste.. Ja op de laatste luchtfoto zie je inderdaad dat de busroute niet meer klopt. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-03 13:37:05+00:00): toevoerweg parking aangepast mbv bgt omtrekgericht
DaveF (2018-12-15 18:53:21+00:00): Same with this changeset
Luzandro (2018-12-03 19:18:23+00:00): Hallo Weltbild, 
bitte verwende keine generischen Beschreibungen wie "Geh- und Wanderweg" als Name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

die access-Tags habe ich logisch vereinfacht auf vehicle=private (könnte auch forestry sein), horse=no und bicycle=no
Weltbild (2018-12-08 14:02:14+00:00): Hallo Luzandro,

danke für deinen hilfreichen Kommentar! Wir haben den Namen nun auf 'Entensteinweg' umbenannt. Wir wollten mit den Änderungen anzeigen, dass dies lediglich ein privater Geh- und Wanderweg ist, worauf u.a. das Radfahren verboten ist.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:31:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-03 14:40:58+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65107583
demon_box (2018-12-03 09:31:37+00:00): ciao ;-) certo che almeno "ogni tanto" un commento ai tuoi changeset non farebbe proprio male.... cordialmente!
--enrico
opendcc (2018-12-02 21:21:29+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap.

Offensichtlich handelt sich bei diesem und den folgenden Edits um einen mechanischen Edit. Wurde dieser abgesprochen?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
DD1GJ (2018-12-06 07:12:15+00:00): Alles gelöscht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65105739
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
kartonage (2018-12-02 15:29:36+00:00): Hallo Schraubaer,

da du Deutschlandweit Autowerkstätten nach einem gewissen Muster hinzufügst würde mich interessieren was die Datengrundlage/Quelle für die Eintragungen ist. Besonders auch weil Einträge wie diese hier fragwürdig sind. Zum einen weil hier schon eine Tankstelle eingetragen ist und zum anderen weil deine Eintragung nicht besonders sinnvoll ist (die Tankstelle von Aral sollte getrennt sein von der Werkstatt). Es wurde vor einiger Zeit schonmal ähnliches von einem anderen User versucht. Auffällig dabei ist, dass ihr die selbe ältere JOSM-Version benutzt und die Qualität der Eintragungen recht niedrig zu sein scheint. Vielleicht irre ich mich, aber bei so einem ähnlichen Muster muss ich einfach mal nachfragen ob es da einen Zusammenhang gibt. (zum Verständnis: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2303)

Über eine Antwort würde ich mich freuen.

Schöne Grüße
aseerel4c26 (2018-12-02 15:53:35+00:00): Nachdem ich eben selbst den Schraubaer darauf ansprechen wollte, fand ich diesen Kommentar. Ich habe mal noch per Mail darauf hingewiesen und um Antwort VOR weiteren Bearbeitungen gebeten.
aseerel4c26 (2018-12-02 20:07:21+00:00): Keine Antwort - dafür schon drei weitere Bearbeitungen ... Schraubaer, bitte antworte hier!
tux67 (2018-12-03 07:39:33+00:00): btw. es gibt einen zweiten Änderungssatz mit Diskussion ohne reply: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65105739
Ist das was für die DWG oder Forum?
DD1GJ (2018-12-04 19:29:56+00:00): DWG wäre zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt übertrieben.

Hallo Schraubaer, wenn Du die gestellten Fragen nicht innerhalb 24 Stunden beantwortest, werde ich alle Deine Eintragungen zurücksetzen
MKnight (2018-12-04 21:50:15+00:00): +1
DD1GJ (2018-12-06 07:10:59+00:00): Alles gelöscht, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65105739
mavl (2018-12-24 23:43:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
muralito (2018-12-02 23:23:56+00:00): Si no tiene separacion fisica hay que dibujar una sola via y no dos. Lo mejor para lo que intentaste dibujar, en vez de hacer trunk link largo que no es lo real, es agregar una senda mas de desaceleracion o de aceleracion que es lo real.
muralito (2018-12-02 23:26:45+00:00): Es mas, casi ni una senda completa de aceleracion/desacelacion hay en ese lugar.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Ilja Tscherkas (2018-12-02 15:58:42+00:00): Looks like this user jokes: there are only 2 tube lines in Minsk. Is there any moderator?
Tomas Straupis (2018-12-03 09:59:53+00:00): Dauguma pastatų paprastai yra stačiais kampais. iD redaktoriuje galima pažymėti nubraižytą pastatą ir spausti „s“ - tada pastato kampai bus „sustačiakampinti“.
mueschel (2018-12-16 13:11:52+00:00): Hi,
the tag " recycling:antrinės_žaliavos " is not used in other places. Could you explain what this means? 

Thanks, Jan
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
freebeer (2018-12-03 15:01:35+00:00): apparently reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65107583
freebeer (2018-12-03 00:46:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65109000 where the changeset comment is: Yes.  Both changesets reverted, user reported for official rubber ruler thwack on the back of the hand.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
KKS (2019-01-05 22:47:25+00:00): Ви нанесли вулиці на Виноградарі яких ще не існує. Якщо вулиця є в генплані це не значить що вона є в реалі. 
Будь ласка виправіть відповідно до реальної ситуації
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-03 10:20:29+00:00): Hi xaver_m, welcome to OSM.

Your map changes should be reviewed by a local contributor. You removed several mapped private ways. Normally, if a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private tag and don't delete the way. 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=private

More details about this changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65098284
DD1GJ (2018-12-02 20:35:39+00:00): Hallo xaver_m, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Solche pauschalen Löschungen sind unerwünscht. Die Einfahrt zu "Am Anger 3" war zudem bereits als privat gekennzeichnet. Die Wege sind in der Realität vorhanden. Diese Eintragungen bei OSM werden z.B. von einem Zeitungsverlag für eine Wegstreckenberechnung genutzt, um die Einhaltung des Mindestlohnes der Zusteller zu dokumentieren. Auch für Feuerwehr und Rettungsdienste ist es hilfreich, wenn auf OSM-basierenden Einsatzkarten die Zufahrten zu zurückliegenden Gebäuden ersichtlich sind.

Daher habe ich diesen Änderungssatz zurückgesetzt und werde es noch bei weiteren tun.
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-03 10:21:53+00:00): Same here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65098284
mavl (2018-12-24 23:33:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Alan Bragg (2019-04-19 19:09:19+00:00): Changed address for parking lot at end of street from Billing to Billings
mapmeld (2019-01-20 22:36:18+00:00): 👍 ! saw an article on CNN and went to see if OSM was up-to-date
muzirian (2019-01-03 05:52:38+00:00): nice work on adding missing roads
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65098865
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-03 10:22:39+00:00): should be reverted.
Jakka (2018-12-02 16:30:21+00:00): Je hebt een speed bump toegevoegd. Prima Karel Custisstraat heeft nog geen maxspeed tag. Ken jij die?
Jan-PieterBaert (2018-12-03 17:10:38+00:00): Ja, ik heb er ook nog een aantal toegevoegd voor de bijliggende straten
Frans S (2018-12-03 09:07:40+00:00): Hi Boggedy,  I see your mapping as unclassified. But ! Since this road connects 3 residential area's I should tag this as residential.  I'm not going to change it. I'ts up to the mapper/validater, I just want you to share my idea about this. Best regards
Boggedy (2018-12-03 12:53:10+00:00): Frans S . I would have thought residential was in a town and unclassified was extra urban even if part of a road were in a town, 

Normally businesses locate on extra urban roads and therefore they are not residential but mixed. 

residential roads would be no business or industry
Frans S (2018-12-03 14:44:35+00:00): You are right. I have to review some mappings. Thanks
Boggedy (2018-12-03 14:56:34+00:00): Frans S . We were even asked in the instructions for #hotosm-project-5234  NOT to do roads but as the road network is such crap I felt I had to at least connect urbanisations (villages) to somewhere logical. So did you for that matter. 

This is the fault of  @Russdeffner :) who told us that: 

"Project Specific Mapping Notes
The road network in Luzon is 'good enough' for now, please concentrate on buildings for this project."
user_5173844 (2018-12-02 20:37:11+00:00): Hi RAC_UK,

I've been previously told this is not how addr:place should be used. It is a replacement for addr:street for villages that have no street names and are instead addressed by the village name itself.

Also, I am not at all sure what are we supposed to tag as addr:city. Towns? If so, what do we call a town? Post towns? Not a bad idea, especially in combination with post codes but it would often require a lower level place name, like addr:place you used in your changeset.

I think that's a material for a broader discussion. As far as I know, current consensus is: addr:place are very rare in the UK, addr:city are for town names but naming criteria are unclear.

Regards,
ndrw6
trigpoint (2018-12-03 09:44:16+00:00): Posttowns are primarily for Royal Mail operational purposes, they are not intended to describe the geographical or political area.
Whilst not perfect, addr :city has been used to describe the place which is what local people will identify to. I am fairly sure that the people of Raunds do not consider themselves residents of Wellingborough.

My own small town suffers the same fate of being considered part of a larger town 20km away, it is a large political issue with the problems it causes with deliveries going to a similar address in a different town or even the police turning up to arrest someone with the same address, but in a different town.

OSM should be a geographical database, not tweaked to reflect a large organisations view of the world. When I travel I really don't care where the local Royal Mail comes from. 

Maybe if there is a usecase for including the post town in OSM but that really should be a separate tag, maybe addr:posttown, but existing tags should reflect the geographic reality.
RAC_UK (2018-12-03 18:21:22+00:00): Hi,

However addresses get tagged outside of large settlements is going to be wrong in someones eyes. As I was the one who originally added most of the addresses in the change set I have made all the addresses consistently wrong.

Looking back through the mailing lists this seems to be an issue that will drag on and on. Officialdom doesn't help as the same organisation will have the same address both ways.
user_5173844 (2018-12-03 19:57:07+00:00): (I don't have an opinion on what conventions should we use, as long as it is clear and generally accepted)

I like an idea of mapping post towns in one form or another. Whether we like it or not, they form a part of an official address and they can be useful (e.g. when addressing isolated houses that don't seem to belong to any town or village). Perhaps instead of using tags we should draw boundaries?

By the way, folks on #osm-gb advised it is OK to use addr:place for mapping names of smaller areas like business parks or campuses even if wiki says otherwise. Again, I am not sure if that qualifies as a consensus but it seems reasonable.
user_5173844 (2018-12-08 06:20:55+00:00): Hi RAC_UK,

Do not revert your changes but also please wait a bit before changing more addresses. There are some community members in favour of the scheme you are using (with small modifications) and AFAIK proposals are being prepared.