piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2020-08-20 22:31:15+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-08-20 15:27:24+00:00): hi there, thanks for your contributions. i noticed you have made a couple of incorrect edits on Madeira (such as changing the beach to sandy beach). As in this edit, this is a service road to access the boats. it's not a footway at all https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=32.64834788052738&lng=-16.97468018539554&z=17&pKey=G2Re1e1IllxlXf-ng-gsCw&focus=photo&x=0.5275475725073137&y=0.5505827757970598&zoom=0
THIERRY COSTA CARVALHO (2020-08-22 11:49:32+00:00): Fazenda Barreiro
user_5239402 (2020-08-20 01:07:22+00:00): 이상한걸로 이름 바꾸지 마세요
user_5239402 (2020-08-20 01:14:11+00:00): 실제 이름으로 편집해야 합니다
Frans S (2020-08-21 15:25:08+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Sorry to say but your mappings are far below par.
Not accurate at all.
I invalidate task 1488 so you can adjust your mappings

Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-08-21 15:28:41+00:00): Hello again.
After a brief look I decided to remove all your mappings because it takes so much more time to adjust your mappings rather than mapping them from scratch
Best regards
Frans S (2020-08-22 09:28:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are below par. 
Not accurate mapped by following the outlines of a building,  Oversize mapped and not square your buildings.
Sorry, but this are my findings.
Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
AntMadeira (2020-08-21 22:50:58+00:00): Olá, Flalolgo.
Sê bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap.
Vi que começaste por mapear em Caxarias algumas ruas e estradas, passando-as para caminhos pedonais e passeios. Como foi uma alteração que prejudica o mapa, reverti as tuas alterações.
Se a tua intenção era indicar que as ruas e estradas tinham passeio, existe outra forma de o fazer, que é usara a etiqueta  sidewalk=both(ou left ou right) juntamente com a etiqueta highway (que já existia e não deve ser alterada).
Para passeios e caminhos pedonais à parte da estrada (que não estejam pegados) é que podes desenhar à parte, usando a etiqueta highway=footway.
Qualquer dúvida, podes contactar-me ou entrar no canal do Telegram, onde a comundiade portuguesa de OSM todos os assuntos relativos ao mapeamento.
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
user_11435438 (2020-08-22 06:04:56+00:00): Hi, i see that you created a subway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838851717)[838851717], but i checked info, it's not any proposed or existing subway, maybe a mistake?
rab (2020-08-20 18:01:49+00:00): Hello,
your shape:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838851897
My try:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/839096405
Please try to be more accurate and use the "q" key to square your shapes
Frans S (2020-08-20 09:30:54+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for mapping her
A remark.
your mappings are rather imprecise. Please map more accurate .

Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-08-20 09:34:25+00:00): Hi
Another small issue. Don't map cars and truck. Rather easy to identify
Best regards
Frans S (2020-08-20 07:51:24+00:00): Hello. Thank you for mapping here
I am reviewing your mappings. 
you are rether new here and I noticed that you made the common beginners mistakes.
The Imagery is also not of much help to identify the buildings properly
Try to change to the Maxar Premium Imagery
In attached documents is info how to do that and to align the offset.
Map only buildings. not the courtyards attached to them, Mostly you can see where the shadow of a building ends
Do not follow the lines of the trees but extrapolate the roofline. 
And last but not least. Square each rectangular building with the Q key

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-08-20 07:57:03+00:00): Hi.  More info
You mapped 237 buildings and none were squared.
Please open this task again (584) and correct your mappings
Best regards
Palolo (2020-08-20 03:19:20+00:00): Please map the buildings accurately. Follow the outline of the building and use the q key to square corners.
Frans S (2020-08-21 15:33:49+00:00): Hello, Thanks for mapping here
Your mappings are a bit below par.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Glassman (2020-08-22 02:20:57+00:00): I reverted this changeset which changed the road into a powerline. I suspect you didn't intend to do that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89660547
stephankn (2020-10-03 07:17:14+00:00): way 838864874 is tagged as ford. given the surrounding, this is quite unlikely. Other ways nearby have the same wrong tagging. Also you did not connect the ways to the road network.
We also do not create "areas" to label village. Please use the established and documented tags from the wiki. If you need assistance, please contact experienced mappers, for example in the forum. Please also take care of warnings displayed by your editor. It did warn you about the problems before you submitted.
naveenpf (2020-09-16 00:59:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89661060
Glassman (2020-08-22 02:22:29+00:00): Tip: square the building by selecting the outline, then just type a "q"

Also - building outline should follow the roof line. A number of these do not. Can you fix them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89661062
stevea (2020-09-07 04:37:56+00:00): When you close your edit (save changes), please use a MUCH more descriptive text besides "adding/correcting info."  That is distinctly Unhelpful and actually looks like you are hiding something.  Use highly descriptive text like "changed some buildings from aerial imagery" or "added a restaurant I visited."

I learned how to sail at the MBAC almost fifty years ago (and I think it once saved our lives when I was caught in a sudden storm on a ketch).

Use changeset comments well, please!
ALLstarGUY (2021-06-21 02:34:42+00:00): I learned to waterski and windsurf there.   And later served as Chairman of the SDSU Campus Recreation Board which operates the MBAC facility.   And still  later attended Boating Safety/ Rescue, Navigation, Marine firefighting, and law enforcement classes there as a Ranger /Lifeguard for the City.
ALLstarGUY (2021-06-21 02:35:14+00:00): i will elaborate on future edits
stevea (2021-06-21 02:39:19+00:00): I appreciate that.

My sister went to SDSU, my father started KPBS-TV (Channel 15) there about 55 years ago.  I have fond memories.  Sail Bay was a lot of fun; all my friends were old enough (14) to get a SCUBA license, I was 13-3/4 that summer, so I learned to sail (instead).
Warin61 (2020-08-22 00:57:29+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM! 

Unfortunately this change set broke the administration boundaries for King Island Council, Currie and Loorana. 
I have reverted some of the data you entered to restore these admin. boundaries. I don't think that will have much effect on the data you entered.
habi (2020-08-24 08:32:41+00:00): Hey!
You've added 'name=building' to all the buildings in this changeset.
This is not necessary, tagging them with 'building=yes' (as you also did) is the correct way.
I removed all the superfluous names.
Have a good day!
habi (2020-08-24 08:51:19+00:00): Also you've added multiple buildings as duplicates of already present buildings.
I removed those, too.
Kovoschiz (2020-08-20 07:55:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487005857 pick-up drop-off could indeed be considered `=driveway`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89662140
habi (2020-08-24 11:13:13+00:00): Please don't add descriptive names for buildings.
Tagging them with 'building=yes' is good.
Kovoschiz (2020-08-20 08:00:36+00:00): You are allowed to leave any time after entering
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89663610
Kovoschiz (2020-08-20 08:02:23+00:00): Cf other roads, changed accordingly
Kovoschiz (2020-08-20 08:08:27+00:00): Also taxis are always allowed
MrRoqoto (2020-09-14 03:12:21+00:00): Hay que revertir lo de las alertas COVID, ya están más que obsoletas a esta fecha y el proyecto/idea no se dio.
Frans S (2020-11-24 15:58:24+00:00): Hello . Thanks for mapping here 
Please map next time more accurate. Your mappings are often oversized and do not follow the outlines of a building
See this webpage for the changes which has to be made. Tall buildings are moved to their footprint.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94716495
Best regards
Leo Slager (2020-08-20 09:37:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
trigpoint (2020-08-20 08:24:41+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/838894289 is just a private service road leading to a parking area for the houses. It is certainly not a residential road.

Cheers Phil
di5order (2020-08-20 08:33:20+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for info!
LineScribe (2024-10-27 19:26:34+00:00): Does the tourism attraction need to be separated from the building? I think the attraction is the whole area.
Brian@Brea (2024-10-28 04:20:22+00:00): I don't think I understand your question @LineScribe. The way I use tourism is almost always paired with another description in the tagging system. Let's use the Mamba way from this changeset (way=290457653). That attraction will get the tourism=attraction tag but will get a description tag of attraction=roller_coaster to help describe it. Tourism=attraction tags almost always get applied to the building/roof that houses the attraction (see Mamba for example). Sometimes the set of tags will get applied as an area like over at the Scandi Scrambler ride here at Worlds of Fun (way=318163258) where the area of the attraction is easily identified and doesn't overlap any other attraction areas. But tagging areas for large rides often cause confusion to anyone who would use the map so it's generally discouraged. You can check the OSM Wiki page about toursim=attraction for additional guidelines. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction)
Zandu (2024-10-28 12:42:46+00:00): I differ to your experience and appreciate your contributions to the map. And your point on if the name of the attraction is spread over a huge area then it becomes hard to know where to go for the attraction makes sense. Thanks!
q_un_go (2020-08-28 11:45:32+00:00): You can see in the area you have edited a new bypass road (with gps-tracks) which is not shown in the imahery you have used for your edits.
The service road you have (re)drawn (before I had deleted it) has been completed renaturated after the opening of the new bypass road in July 2020.
using the gps-overlay you can also see, that the new raod, the new roundabouts and the new agricultural track parallel to the bypass road are verified by gps-tracks.
q_un_go (2020-08-28 11:48:19+00:00): https://ais.badische-zeitung.de/piece/0b/1c/c2/4b/186434123-h-720.jpg
here you can see the dismantling of the old road, which you have drawn using the outdated imagery,
skyper (2020-08-31 11:52:06+00:00): @contrai1
Would you, please, comment, on this issue. As a payed mapper it is your duty to watch your mailbox and respond to comments about your CS.
skyper (2020-09-01 12:49:33+00:00): I wrote a PM-Mail but contrai1 did not react on the first CS-Comment some month ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86433775.

I wait one more day for a reaction.

Would be happy an answer in German.

skyper
Nakaner (2020-09-01 13:25:11+00:00): Hallo skyper,

die Organised Editing Guideline sagt klipp und klar, dass Antworten von organisieten Mappern binnen zwei Arbeitstagen auf demselben Kanal zu erfolgen haben. Da die Frist überschritten ist, kannst du die DWG anrufen und um eine Sperre des Benutzerkontos oder der Organisation bitten.

Viele Grüße

Michael
skyper (2020-09-01 14:41:57+00:00): Danke für die Infos. Da es nicht nur um eine Person geht, dort aber wenigstens ein wenig Reaktion gezeigt wurde, warte ich noch einen Tag.

Bin da eher beim Sperren der Organisation, damit alle angestellten Personen die richtigen Anweisungen erhalten, welche, vor ab, im OSM-Wiki veröffentlicht werden.

Z.b. sollten doch zumindest der Umgang mit Object-History geschult werden.

Eine Begrenzung auf eine Region und nicht wilde Änderungen weltweit ist auch angebracht.

Warum nicht auch Sprachkenntnis der lokalen Sprachen voraussetzten? Wie soll ich sonst 'note' oder CS Kommentare verstehen oder gar den lokale Presse? 

Grüße skyper
Nakaner (2020-09-01 18:41:34+00:00): Hallo skyper,

die Frage, ob man ggf. Sprachkenntnis voraussetzen sollte, damit die Organisation note=*-Tags, Notes, Änderungssatzkommentare und lokale Presse lesen kann, ist diskutierenswert. Es ist IMHO wirklich eine Diskussion wert, ob wir das vielleicht doch nicht mal in Deutschland einführen wollen. Es hat sicherlich seinen Grund, warum sich Leute nicht über die vielen in OSM aktiven kommunalen Vermessungsämter in NRW aufregen, über Amazon aber schon. Diese Diskussion ist im Forum oder auf der Mailingliste Talk-de aber besser aufgehoben.

Viele Grüße

Michael
skyper (2020-09-01 22:20:00+00:00): Hey Michael,

Ja, werde mich mal im Forum einklinken.

Habe bei meiner kleinen Studie entdeckt, dass weder die Seite der Firma, noch die CS, noch die einzelnen User-Seiten mit den Richtlinien übereinstimmen. Eine Zusammenfassung und Erklärung der genauen Änderungen finde ich auch nicht.

Da bleibt mir ja gar nichts anderes übrig als alle User und die Firma sperren zu lassen. Zumindest solange bis alle Sachverhalte geklärt sind.

Mal sehen was die DWG dazu sagt.

Viele Grüße
skyper
skyper (2020-09-03 19:20:34+00:00): Immer noch kein Kommetar. Weder vom Verursachenden noch von den Ebenen darüber.

Alle Fragen müssen beantwortet werden, darum gleich die nächste:

Warum braucht es so lange für eine offizielle Reaktion?

Wo bleiben die Antworten?

skyper
contrai1 (2020-09-04 03:59:31+00:00): Apologies for the delay in response. This is a mistake from my end where my mail box had an issue in piping up these messages. I will make sure it will not happen again. We generally use the recent GPS traces (3 month old) to check the availability of roads, but since the road is blocked in July it was missed from my end. Also all the available satellite images showed clear road availability including Maxar. Going forward I will avoid adding any such roads with low confidance to OSM.
skyper (2020-09-04 09:49:08+00:00): Then, please, tell me why are you writting about ground source for every edit on the wiki?

How did you find this "missing" toad?
Which sources where used to find the "missing" road?

Why did your reviewer not react on the first unanswered comment?

skyper
contrai1 (2020-09-08 07:08:45+00:00): Hi Skyper, 
As mentioned we use recent GPS traces to add the missing roads into OSM based on available OSM resources. Yes, I completely understand the importance of checking the history before making changes to validate the edit. I sincerely apologise for that miss from my end. Our review team performs a second level check and give us feedback based on which we fix the editing errors if any. I will consider this as an important learning and will ensure that such errors will not be repeated. Thanks for your valuable inputs.
axelr (2020-09-14 07:21:41+00:00): Du hast mit der Quelle knowledge Straßen aus der Busroute entfernt. Könntest du uns an deinem Kenntnisstand teilhaben lassen, damit wir den Routenverlauf wieder durchgängig hinbekommen ?
stadt-mh-hartung (2020-09-14 07:41:38+00:00): Die Buslinie 124 fährt nicht mehr über die Karlsruher Str. und die Peterstr. sondern bleibt auf dem Blötter Weg.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-21 20:13:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7828507447
What do you mean by craft=commercial? There is not really a good description for that in the wiki.
user_2066394 (2020-08-20 14:05:29+00:00): Was war da die Motivation für das Verschieben der Gebäude? Einige Gebäude hat es beim Verschieben in der Form verzogen bzw. sie überschneiden sich mit Gebäuden/Straßen.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=89668628
wolfgang nister (2020-09-05 05:05:25+00:00): Die beiden Flugzeuge sind fix verbaut als Innen- und Außenräume auf dem Dach des NOVAPARK Flugzeughotel Graz. Mit der Bitte um Kontaktaufnahme auf wolfgang.nister@novapark.at
phstangl (2020-09-07 04:10:08+00:00): Hallo:
Ich bin der Meinung das hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=aircraft zutrifft.
toeklk (2020-08-20 18:45:45+00:00): Thanks, was just about to add a note about this one, passed here today and noted indeed "la vire" and the white-blue-white markings!
VitalieS (2020-08-20 12:54:29+00:00): Localul s-a închis definitiv? Ce se află acum acolo?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89670112
Sergiu Bulat (2020-08-20 13:10:02+00:00): acolo acum se duc constructii. Cladirea e demolata si e facut un loc mare de parcare. Si Lebada Alba e in reparatii de proportii. Probabil va aparea si o terasa acolo.
CloCkWeRX (2020-08-23 13:28:51+00:00): This isn't private. It is gated, but it's a gazetted, public road with gates from survey
Allison P (2020-12-27 21:39:18+00:00): Hi, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Just so you know, the service roads you added were demolished a couple of years ago. The Bing imagery in the area is more recent than Mapbox, so if you map here in the future, I recommend using it instead.
loyakris (2020-12-28 06:55:55+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of road, I've missed to check the latest aerial imagery. Will ensure not to repeat such mistakes. Looking forward to learn more from you. Happy Mapping!

Regards,
loyakris
lorissa (2020-08-20 07:13:02+00:00): Kein "alt_name", sondern Zweitname. Die (Alt-)Anwohner nennen und kennen ihn nur als Kuhgraben. Die kennen keinen (Neuen) Wiesengraben. Wenn die wen den Namen Kuhgraben sagen, dann findet derjeinige ihn in der Karte nicht, weil nur irgendwo in der Datenbank eingetragen, aber nicht in der Map sichtbar. Nicht nur stumpf von woanders kopieren, sondern ON THE GROUND mappen! Siehe Brandenburg Viewer. Ich zweifle an dem Zusatz "Neuer". Das ist wohl ein Resultat schlechter Pflege der Gewässerkarte. Nur weil es Neue Wiesen heißt muss es nicht Neuer Wiesengraben sein.
streckenkundler (2020-12-02 11:50:51+00:00): Bitte alt_name nicht falsch interpretieren...alt_name steht für Alternativname oder Zweitname... 
Wenn es alter Name ist, wäre es old_name

Deine Grundannahme ist aber total korrekt... On The Ground zählt.

Ich hab jetzt auf die Schnelle keinen Zugriff auf Berliner Gewässerdaten. Für Brandenburg kann ich aber nur mit größer Strenge davor warnen, Gewässernamen einfach so aus Karten zu übernehmen. Da sehr sehr viel falsches drin! Sowas muß (eigentlich) bei der oberen Wasserbehörde in den Daten geändert werden, denn diese Daten werden an die Vermessungsverwaltungen (hier LGB) weitergegeben, die das (falsche) dann rendern (TK/DNM). In den digitalen Vektor-Daten des Landes Brandenburg stehen teilweise 3-4 (!) Namen (bzw. Varianten) drin...

Bei dem "Neuen Wiesengraben" = "Kuhgraben" hätte ist es sogar andersrum gemacht... name=Kuhgraben alt_name=Neuer Wiesengraben

Solche Gewässerbezeichnungen wie Neuer... zeigt immer das da am Gewässersystem mal verändert wurde, ist Gelegentlich zu beobachten. 

Sven
lorissa (2024-12-17 16:16:38+00:00): OK. Also wenn du willst, dann ändere das so: name=Kuhgraben; alt_name=Neuer Wiesengraben. Aber ist auch egal.
Nakaner (2020-08-21 08:06:14+00:00): Hallo,

kannst du bitte in deinen Änderungssatzkommentaren kurz und knapp angeben, was du geändert hast? "Hinzu" ist kein ausreichender Änderungssatzkommentar. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße

Michael
Arma IRM-ED (2020-10-15 10:22:58+00:00): Hi, vietnam321. I have adjusted the tertiary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/838919264) based on Maxar Premium Imagery.
axelr (2020-09-14 07:30:20+00:00): Die neu angelegten Relationen NE10 mit nur einer Straße machen wenig Sinn. Lass uns doch auch hier an deinem Kenntnisstand teilhaben. Wolltest du vielleicht nur eine Linienfarbe zufügen ?
stadt-mh-hartung (2020-09-14 07:50:14+00:00): Ich wollte den Fahrweg des NE10 ändern. Von der Scheffelstr. biegt der NE10 nach links in die Bruchstr. und dann wieder nach links in die Schillerstr.
Anakil (2020-08-20 09:15:59+00:00): Bonjour quentinpaquot,

Je suppose que ce que tu veux dire c'est que le chemin est difficilement praticable ? Car ici tu as indiqué que le chemin était "légalement" non accessible aux cyclistes (bicycle=no).
Dans le cas d'indiquer uniquement qu'il est difficle à pratiquer, il vaut mieux utiliser les attributs : "revêtement" (surface=cobblestone, asphalt, gravel, ...) , "types de voies" (tracktype=grade1, grade2, ...) et "régularité du sol" (smoothness=good/bad/...). Cela changera leur apparence sur les cartes et les calculateurs d'itinéraires cyclistes utilisent généralement ces informations pour prendre ou non un chemin. :-) 
Pour le moment ce chemin est indiqué étant en pavés (surface=cobblestone) et avec un type de voie "dur" similaire à l'asphalte ou à un sol compact (tracktype=grade1). 

Bien à toi,
Anakil
quentinpaquot (2020-08-23 11:25:42+00:00): Bonjour Anakil,
Merci pour ton aide et ces précisions - bveaucoup plus clair pour moi pour collaborer à présent!
Bon WE,
Quentin
BeKri (2020-08-20 10:55:45+00:00): Servus,
irgendwie hast Du die substation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2531065493
940 Meter nach Osten verschoben.
Ich denke es war ein Versehen und habe sie "zurückgeschubst".
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89686050
Gruss und habby tagging derBeKri
Leo Slager (2020-08-22 10:30:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.