piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_242798 (2016-11-20 09:27:54+00:00): Changeset heeft geen commentaar. FOUT!
Footway loopt dwars door Dijckscampenlaan 106 (building) is FOUT!
Footway is vastgeplakt aan Dijckscampenlaan 103 (building) is FOUT!
Dijckscampenlaan (tertiary) is Duplicate way (FOUT!) en ook Busroute 307 is hierdoor beschadigd.
Fietspad, Gorsebospad, liep recht. Nadat een kruisende footway is toegevoegd zit er een 70 graden bocht (links, rechts, links in dit fietspad). Ook FOUT!
Nieuwe pedestrian kruist Klipfontein, maar de kruisende wegen zijn niet verbonden. Net niet. Dus niet. FOUT!
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:03:42+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:03:27+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:03:10+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:00:01+00:00): This is in Bolivia
user_5359 (2016-09-01 19:15:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position and the tags of your node: I don't think a hospital exists in the middle of a street.
Lee Carré (2022-01-17 06:02:47+00:00): Couldn't have modified the existing elements, instead of deleting & re-adding?

http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:02:55+00:00): This is in Bolivia
luschi (2016-11-16 19:10:22+00:00): Hi morinaga,
please use "tunnel:name" and not "tunnel_name".
Some months ago the Japanese community have decided to use only "tunnel:name".
please no longer use tunnel_name.
regards
kagozoh (2016-11-16 23:43:43+00:00): Hi luschi,

thank you for your comment and your modification.
I will be careful.
Gazer75 (2016-09-16 04:03:07+00:00): Intersection for fv410 and 420 needs a lot of fixing. Do not use separate ways for lanes at intersections and crossing ways over another like this.
Use turn lanes and turn restrictions.
Only lanes physically divded by kerbs or similar should have separate ways.
NKA (2016-09-16 04:38:52+00:00): Agree. This is a problem from the Elveg import data. Will look into it.
Gazer75 (2016-09-16 06:11:12+00:00): I had that intersection perfectly mapped out before you replaced it with Elveg :)
Gazer75 (2016-09-16 06:13:20+00:00): Never replace existing roads unless you have local knowledge of the road and know that what is there is wrong ;)
NKA (2016-09-16 07:00:22+00:00): Agree. I know this place very well.
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:02:11+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Carnildo (2016-09-01 04:18:52+00:00): Thanks for adding this -- I don't know how I missed it when I was mapping the area earlier this year.  My mapping notes show both ends of it, but somehow, I never followed up on mapping the actual trail.

Is "bridle path" the actual name for it?  When I've been mapping things in Riverside, I've been reserving the "name" field for things that are actually on signposts in the area.
reecee (2016-09-01 13:06:07+00:00): Glad to be able to help. Good point. I don't know that there is an actual name for the trail, just that it is within the horse / hiker only boundaries. I think your idea is best. I'll try to remove the name and just leave the trail type.
mathieuS (2017-05-06 16:00:21+00:00): This changeset is mostly erroneous ! Route de Berne and many crossings along it changed a lot over the past few years, so orthophoto from 2012 cannot be used any more ! Your changes introduce errors over features which I adapted to the reality in a previous changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39198926), and I am not really happy about that. I guess you made changes based only on imagery instead of checking on the field ?
ika-chan! UK-USA (2017-05-06 16:17:54+00:00): If you like, I can revert it entirely but I am not sure about the tone of language in the comment.
mathieuS (2017-05-06 16:37:21+00:00): Maybe the changeset is a bit old now to be reverted. I would go for merging again the first portion of the Route de Berne and correcting the crossing Route de Berne - Chemin Louis-Boissonnet. You can give a look at http://map.lausanne.ch/ for update imagery.
ika-chan! UK-USA (2017-05-06 16:54:42+00:00): Pas de panique! I managed to flush the changeset with http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48456866. All I had to do was add your road crossing back, and fill a gap in the Route Nationale 1 relation.
mathieuS (2017-05-06 17:12:03+00:00): Cool ! I just don't get why Chemin Louis-Buissonnet is a member of bus route 16 ... but that problem has a different origin I guess.
Carnildo (2016-09-01 04:08:32+00:00): What's your source for the names here?  "Equestrian Lane" is what's on the street signs for the road intersecting Trails/Government Way while "Aubrey L. White" is on the big, fancy, non-official sign.  The road leading to the equestrian area doesn't have any name that I've been able to find, and is legally just a driveway (specifically, 3402 North Equestrian Lane).
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:01:47+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:00:25+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 15:58:45+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Upendrakarukonda (2016-09-07 04:17:56+00:00): Hello,

Welcome to Openstreetmap. May I know the reason behind the deletion of the way.

Regards,
Upendrakarukonda.
Totte (2016-09-07 11:26:44+00:00): Hi Upendrakarukonda,
If I have deleted an existing way by mistake I apologize - what I have done in this change is to update the race track to current form (not reflected by the background aerial photo yet). If a road is missing now please recreate it or tell me where and I will do it.
Best regards, Totte
Upendrakarukonda (2016-09-15 06:51:24+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for response, We added the way.

Regards,
Upendrakarukonda.
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:01:09+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 16:00:54+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 15:56:40+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 15:58:27+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 15:57:35+00:00): This is in Bolivia
user_5359 (2016-09-01 19:12:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 15:58:13+00:00): This is in Bolivia
Baconcrisp (2016-09-01 15:59:35+00:00): This is in Bolivia
VictorIE (2020-10-04 02:55:44+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440110673

Is the abbey actually across the street?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-12 14:13:29+00:00): removido
Viajero Perdido (2016-09-01 00:10:29+00:00): "re-annoy", "sanctuary".

I had better things to do than deal with this mess-up, which had no real-world purpose other than satisfy some arcane mapping rules.

Mapping rules: satisfied.
Landowner: annoyed.
Local mapper: annoyed.
muralito (2016-09-01 02:22:15+00:00): Por favor revisa, que por el tamaño esos comercios probablemente sean "convenience" y no "supermarket".
Jakson Aquino (2016-09-04 20:24:12+00:00): Felipe, acho que a correção da hierarquia foi correta, mas tem mais. A Aguanambi faz referência à BR-116 desde a Domingos Olímpio, mas o km 0 da BR-116 é somente no cruzamento da 13 de Maio com Aguanambi, de acordo com essa matéria: http://diariodonordeste.verdesmares.com.br/cadernos/cidade/trecho-de-10-km-da-br-116-e-municipalizado-1.1524585
Felipe Alves (2016-09-05 11:51:52+00:00): É verdade, não tinha reparado que este trecho ainda tinha referência a BR. Vou retirar.
muralito (2016-09-01 02:33:08+00:00): Por favor, revisar esta correccion porque el limite quedo abierto.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3338907
FvGordon (2016-09-01 11:56:51+00:00): I fixed it from old OSM data (boundary outline is closed now).
Oberaffe (2016-09-02 07:51:06+00:00): Hi,

all NHs in India get at the moment a new number.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_National_Highways_in_India_by_highway_number
muzirian (2017-04-11 15:46:17+00:00): is that feature really a pub?
Владимир К (2016-09-01 06:00:50+00:00): Не нужно писать Остановка в название остановки. Это же и так остановка.
Владимир К (2016-09-01 06:09:17+00:00): господи, что это всё значит? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440131658
gileri (2016-09-02 20:15:16+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce normal la pointe au nord ouest du stade des Deux-Amants ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440133713

De plus, la précision de l'arrondi à l'ouest vient-elle de la source ou c'est une approximation ?
J'aimerais la simplifier.
Olyon (2016-09-03 01:20:40+00:00): Cela vient de la source (Grand Lyon : http://data.grandlyon.com/equipements/lieu-surfacique-du-grand-lyon-lieux-et-fdifices/ ) qui a du se baser sur le cadastre. Simplifie si tu le souhaites, pour la pointe elle est dans le cadastre mais je ne sais pas ce qu'il en est sur le terrain.
gileri (2016-09-04 21:21:50+00:00): Merci :)
gileri (2020-03-22 09:11:59+00:00): Fait : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82477503
Achoin (2016-09-01 23:41:35+00:00): Что же такое-то с этим общежитием.
Для общежития есть специальный тег: building=dormitory, или это теперь обычный жилой дом? Если жилой дом уже называется "общежитие..." и емеет адрес, и этажность, зачем внутри этого дома создавать POI и дублировать в ней всё то же самое что уже есть в полигоне дома?
Achoin (2016-09-01 23:43:18+00:00): Я думаю, точку внутри дома нужно совсем  удалить, а дом оставить.
Владимир К (2016-09-01 05:58:05+00:00): Не соединил точкамипересекающиеся дороги
Derick Rethans (2016-09-01 10:02:29+00:00): What is the name of this Doctor's? And the address?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
pnorman (2016-09-01 10:35:41+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes Google, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Are there any other changesets from other unpermitted sources?

你好，在OSM你不能未经允许拷贝有版权的地图，比如你拷贝的谷歌地图。继续这样拷贝会被永久封停。我必须移除这些拷贝数据。还有其他未经允许的任何更改吗

Paul Norman

For the OSM Data Working Group
ParadoX_ZLWC (2016-09-01 11:39:15+00:00): 你好，这是为了测式网上公布的瓦片地址，实际并没有使用。以后也不会使用。向大神致敬！
Hello, this is in order to measure the online publication of tile address, the actual does not use. Later will not use. To pay tribute to the god!
pankdm (2016-09-01 05:33:41+00:00): http://wowik.000space.com/places/ru-kem/32604428000.htm
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:40:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
trigpoint (2016-09-03 00:01:18+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
B & M is usually tagged as a variety store, it is not really a supermarket.
Cheers Phil
SomeoneElse (2016-09-03 08:19:53+00:00): Actually - what sort of B&M is this?  There's "B & M Bargains" (which is a classic "variety store") and the slightly more upmarket "B & M Home Store".  That gets various tags, including "homewares": http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/iaP (but probably not really a supermarket).
Ross Deacon (2016-09-03 09:57:09+00:00): Hi Phil, it's a B&Monday Home Store. Cheers Ross
Ross Deacon (2016-09-03 09:58:10+00:00): Should have said B&M Home Store.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:39:59+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Skinfaxi (2016-09-01 10:12:46+00:00): cool! schön zu sehen, wenn die Karte wächst.
rza31 (2016-09-01 16:59:53+00:00): Many landuse=residential and industrial are still missing.
rza31 (2016-09-01 17:01:09+00:00): An vielen Orten fehlt noch das landuse=residential.
Hjart (2016-09-01 09:16:45+00:00): Angivelse af at kørsel med motorkøretøjer er tilladt gøres bedst med https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle.
Bemærk at bicycle=yes & foot=yes er implicit. Dvs selvom disse tags ikke er sat, virker routing alligevel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=55.2868%2C8.9023%3B55.2732%2C8.9468
Hjart (2016-09-01 09:19:46+00:00): Ovenstående gælder dog tilsyneladende ikke for highway=path
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:39:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-11 19:18:47+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Alecs01 (2016-09-01 18:36:22+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, ho notato che hai aggiunto diversi oggetti come questo, sei sicuro che siano office:teceommunication http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=telecommunication?uselang=it e non antenne per la telefonia? vista la posizione e le immagini aeree direi la seconda, credo che maps.me non conosca i tag adatti http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:39:39+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
highflyer74 (2016-09-05 09:10:26+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall guck mal bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic%3Dmemorial nach. Auch wichtig: Das Tag name=* bitte nur für Eigennamen verwenden. Wenn also das Denkmal einen offiziellen Namen hat, den als name=* verwenden. Wenn nicht, kein name=* verwenden, denn die Funktion des Objekts ergibt sich aus den anderen Tags.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:39:30+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
freebeer (2018-06-10 17:18:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59717140 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info spam
freebeer (2018-06-10 19:53:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59720589 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me alpine hut spam
Osm1980 (2016-12-15 18:12:56+00:00): adres shakhsitoon ro be hich vajh ezafe nakonid
Alecs01 (2016-09-01 18:40:15+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, can you check names and position of those hostels https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4378799591 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4378814890 both look strange, maybe you wanted to map something else. Those are misplaced too, you tagged a different object (an information board) https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/910348461 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/773324618
mavl (2019-01-13 17:02:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:03:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Hjart (2016-09-01 08:42:33+00:00): Both are allready in OSM
Alecs01 (2016-09-02 18:54:34+00:00): Thanks, but it was already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1523164218, deleted
Hjart (2016-09-01 08:43:46+00:00): No, this is not the little mermaid
Peilscheibe (2016-09-29 19:28:55+00:00): Ein besserer Taggingstil wäre, wenn man Bushaltestellen als lineare Plattform neu modelliert, den existierenden highway=bus_stop und/oder public_transport=platform-Knoten nicht löscht sondern bestehen lässt und in den neuen Way integriert. So hätte man die Möglichkeit, die Historie des bisherigen Geschehens zu erhalten.
e_kloth (2016-10-04 08:24:57+00:00): Okay, ich werde das für zukünftige Bearbeitungen berücksichtigen. Danke für den Hinweis.
Peilscheibe (2016-10-04 18:36:36+00:00): Das wäre prima, danke. Man muss den (alten) Node ja eh anfassen und kann den gleich mit einbeziehen und die Attribute kopieren. Mehrwert ohne Mehraufwand quasi :-)
emergency99 (2016-09-01 12:15:35+00:00): Auch hier, ein maps.me user... :( Die App ist echt ein Problem. Werde heute noch ein Mail an die Developer schreiben.
Владимир К (2016-09-01 10:33:19+00:00): А с большой буквы было сложно написать?
Владимир К (2017-02-13 08:48:02+00:00): Хочу обратить внимание, что станции тегируются не generator, a plant http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:power%3Dplant
emergency99 (2016-09-01 12:12:16+00:00): Da hat wieder mal ein Maps.ME user was gemappt, was er vermutlich gar nicht wollte. Hast den Bearbeiter der die falsxhen Tags gesetzt hat schon angeschrieben?
zimba (2016-09-01 12:22:34+00:00): Nein, habe den user nicht angeschrieben, nehme nicht an dass da irgendwas zurueckkommt, wenn der die app verwendet. Bin heute ueber die ganze stadt druebergegangen und habe mal versucht alle, teils falsche, maps.me notes zu schliessen, da waere ich in einer woche noch dran wenn ich da alle anschreibe. lg
emergency99 (2016-09-01 16:52:27+00:00): Ich habe mehrere User die Maps.ME verwenden angeschrieben und hab auch antworten bekommen. Denn bei der App melden sich diese Leute meist mit ihrem Facebook oder Google account an. Das heißt, die bekommen die Mesage auf ihr emailkonto, dass sie regelmäßig benutzen. Aber stimmt, jedem ein email zu schreiben wird sehr viel arbeit. Wenn mir so ein falscher edit auffällt, schreibe ich die Uploader immer an. Seit 2 Monaten ist es aber extrem geworden... Ich sehe grad wieder eine falsche Node... Na dann, werde ich mal das E-Mail an die Devs verfassen. Und ein Video und Blog Post zu dem Thema können auch nicht schaden... verfassen.
FahRadler (2016-10-07 09:59:22+00:00): Ich habe dieses Löschen und neu einfügen rückgängig gemacht.
Bitte nur neues (own work) ergänzen bzw. abändern
Thomas Windmüller (2016-10-07 10:09:39+00:00): Danke, ich wollte nur die Schranke bei dem Schrebergarten einfügen. Nach dem speichern hatte ich gesehen, dass die Halde fehlt. Das konnte ich nicht mehr rückgängig machen. War einer meiner ersten Versuche.
11daf (2016-09-03 08:18:33+00:00): А телефончик не дадите? :) Откачу, с вашего позволения.
terrible noise (2016-09-01 09:58:01+00:00): 間違えた。東向一方通行を設定。
zarl (2016-09-08 09:35:09+00:00): Bitte schau dir mal die Schlüssel, die du einträgst, im wiki an, damit du lernst, wofür sie verwendet werden. Bei name:de ist "Alle Planeten" komplett falsch, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name 

Wie ich schon in einer deiner Notes (näher am Dt. Museum) geschrieben habe: zur Beschreibung dient description=*

Übrigens ist der komplette Planetenweg bereits als Relation erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3866484
Man kann also danach suchen

Bitte mach dich doch mal mit ein paar Grundlagen im wiki vertraut, hier ist ein ganz guter Einstiegspunkt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide

Grüsse,

Zarl
mc64 (2016-09-08 10:23:29+00:00): Hi Zarl,
danke für deine Hinweise, ich werede mich schlau machen und weiter beitragen. Vor allem die mehrsprachigkeit verwirrt mich noch...zB die Beschreibung auf englisch
Danke
zarl (2016-09-08 10:41:16+00:00): Im wiki sind sehr viele Inhalte auch in einer deutschen Version zu finden, oben ist jeweils eine Auswahl der verfügbaren Sprachversionen.

Die Schlüssel/Werte-Paare in der OSM Datenbank sind grundsätzlich auf englisch (genauer: British English), Ausnahme natürlich der Wert für name und description im jeweiligen Land, hier halt normalerweise auf deutsch. 

Die Datenbank ist international, und braucht einen gemeinsamen Nenner, um maschinell auswertbar zu sein. 

Es gibt auch ein deutsches Forum http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14 bzw. Mailing-Liste https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Mailing_lists

Viel Spass weiterhin!

Carl
BeKri (2016-10-03 02:56:29+00:00): Nachdem 3 Wochen nix passiert ist,
habe ich mir erlaubt den Tag "Alle Planeten" wieder rauszuschmeissen.
Er hat hier einfach nichts verloren.
Constable (2016-09-01 10:46:40+00:00): Ciao, il tag name serve per indicare il nome dell'attività (Pizzeria da Mario, Ristorante Pincopallino, Palestra Big Gym,...), non il nome comune dell'attività svolta (Ristorante, Palestra, Pizzeria)
Ti prego di rimuovere tutti i nomi che hai inserito, perché allo stato attuale non hanno nessuna utilità.
Se hai bisogno di aiuto chiedi pure
Cordiali saluti
nammala (2016-11-16 04:01:44+00:00): Hi GidonW,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Observed that you have adding `curve_geometry` tags to the highways for the node, It is not good way of tagging unless and until there is a mark . So please don't add these tags.

cheers,
nammala
GidonW (2016-11-16 13:17:42+00:00): Hi, 
I'd like to explain these tags - 
I work for a company named Via, a ride-sharing transportation company. 
We use OSM as one of our map data sources in order to navigate in areas 
 where we operate. One of the tags we use internally is "curve_geometry" 
 which allows us to identify nodes that have geometrical importance. The 
 reason this is needed on our end is because we filter nodes that have no 
 navigation tags and, for simplicity and performance issues. We edit the 
 OSM internally on a regular basis, and return changes to the global OSM. 
 Is there a problem with these tags? Do they interfere with your work in 
 any way? I'd be happy to work together to improve ways in the area and 
 use the OSM in the best possible way.
Thanks, 
Gidon
nammala (2016-11-17 05:43:31+00:00): Hi GidonW,

Thanks for getting back. I really like the work you do using OSM. But the tagging system you have been following is inappropriate and that data should be on OpenStreetMap. Making OSM the best should be our motto. Hope you will stop tagging them.
Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
nammala (2016-11-17 05:52:26+00:00): Oops!! the data should not be on OpenStreetMap.
PlaneMad (2016-11-17 05:59:16+00:00): GidonW, there is nothing wrong with adding your own tags, but if its not discussed or documented, there is a high chance other mappers may remove them as being non useful. Maybe as a start, you could write a diary post explaining your rationale behind the tag and why it is useful to be on OSM.
user_5359 (2016-09-01 18:51:57+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! You are NOT a church. For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
literan (2016-09-15 11:57:19+00:00): теги railway=crossing ставятся на железнодорожных переездах. Пересечение трамвайных путей таковым не является.
MosKartograf (2016-09-19 14:21:58+00:00): Спасибо, учту. На оригинальном пути до раздвоения так стояло, как-то не задумался о значении.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:03:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.