piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PT-53 (2022-03-01 07:29:35+00:00): Hallo HaStMe.
Du hast an diesem Weg-Abschnitt"
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163961175/history#map=19/48.05240/9.66651
die Merkmale
- bicycle=yes
- foot=yes
ergänzt.
Diese beiden Merkmale werden bei einem Path als Standart angesehen, wie Du hier sehen kannst:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
Die beiden Ergänzungen sind also unnötig und sollten wieder gelöscht werden. Machst Du das ?
Fragende Grüße


PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-03-13 11:56:14+00:00): Erledigt, Danke
puma515 (2022-02-28 21:59:42+00:00): Danke fürs beheben, ich hatte beim erstelle nicht dran gedacht das Beringstedt eine andre PLZ als Todenbüttel hat.
Rainero (2022-02-28 22:15:49+00:00): Kein Ding, die Ortsteile berühren sich da ja; da kann man leicht mal die Grenze übersehen.
Carlos Brys (2022-03-01 11:00:23+00:00): Hola
Bienvenido a OpenStreetMap y gracias por el aporte.
Noté que agregaste un barrio nuevo y me tomé la libertad de hacerle unos ajustes de acuerdo a las reglas de edición.
Tomas_J (2022-03-02 06:14:47+00:00): Nádhera. Plánujete mapovat i kryt na Parukářce a jine?
vojtechzaboril (2022-03-02 06:28:03+00:00): Dobrý den, bohužel se mi nepodařilo dohledat jakékoliv podklady, resp. se v nich správně zorientovat. Zatím tedy spíše ne.
pizben03 (2022-03-13 16:03:34+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#117959051

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source
pizben03 (2022-03-13 16:03:41+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#117959092

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source
pizben03 (2022-03-13 16:03:49+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#117959126

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source
LeTopographeFou (2023-01-28 22:28:01+00:00): Hello Zcor, you deleted the Space Research and Communication Center. Can you please provide a rationale for that feature which as far as I know is there?
pizben03 (2022-03-13 15:01:06+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#117959589

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:27:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166391.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:25:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166377.
Amr@Gis (2022-03-01 09:02:34+00:00): Hello Amor B;
I noticed you changed the classification for some ways to "primary" and "secondary"
but the previous classification "tertiary" makes the most sense for this highway due to how it’s constructed.
Also, you didn't change the ways associated with it.
Please see the wiki for mapping:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Examples of ways need to upgrade the classification:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36856345/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28619628/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706550178/history
Regards
Amr@Gis
user_5359 (2022-03-01 09:50:25+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/3020041706. What ist the meaning of the tags
    12 = 1221549
    37-205 = Medex
    Zarzecze = pharmacy
    Świętego = Jana Pawła II
habi (2024-08-15 08:10:37+00:00): Ciao Tempus

Because of https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4324285 I stumbled over https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13875717, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13875718 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13875719 which you added here.
They all have some 'weird' names, can you explain (and maybe update) these names?

Happy mapping,
habi
Tempus (2024-08-16 09:28:22+00:00): Bonjour,

Sur le terrain, ce chemin de randonnée est particulier. En effet, les symboles changent durant le parcours. Une partie est du "chemin de randonnée", et une autre "chemin de randonnée de montagne".

C'est pour cela que j'avais créé trois relations, avec une "super-relation" pour les relier. Le lieu de la transition ne contient pas d'indication particulière, c'est pour cela que j'ai donné à la relation le nom du point sur la carte.

Je ne sais pas comment mapper correctement cette particularité, mais de tout unifier avec un seul niveau de difficulté n'est pas correct par rapport à ce qui est indiqué sur le terrain.

J'espère que cela répond en partie à tes questions.

Merci
Raphaël
cytryn (2022-02-28 22:16:51+00:00): Cześć,
Dane w takiej surowej nieobrobionej postaci, mimo szczerych chęci, są po prostu bezużyteczne. Pomijając, że dublują istniejące obiekty, to składają się prawie w 100% z nic nie mówiących tagów, będących zapewne po prostu kalką z jakiegoś rejestru, które w tej formie ani nie zostaną wyświetlone na mapie, ani w żaden sposób nie będą mogły mogły być skonsumowane przez aplikacje.
user_5359 (2022-03-01 15:48:38+00:00): revert, mostly foreign keys
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:20:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166252.
Nearby0051 (2022-03-01 16:05:06+00:00): Danke :)
user_5359 (2022-03-01 16:04:55+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036101749. What is the meaning  of the tag
CLUSTER_ID 	0
CLUSTER_SIZE 	52900
id 	232958
id_2 	1
zones 	6
and the license of data?
mueschel (2022-03-02 17:24:30+00:00): Hallo,
bitte achte bei destination-Tags auf die richtige Reihenfolge der Bestandteile, z.B.

destination:to:backward
destination:symbol:to:forward
destination:symbol:to:lanes:forward

Gruß
Jan
luziferius (2022-03-02 17:32:30+00:00): Moin,

Ich glaube, eine Warnung für diese Fälle wäre eine gute Erweiterung für den Validator in JOSM.

Die Reihenfolgen der Komponenten ist nicht wirklich intuitiv und JOSM schlägt die basierend auf bereits geladenen Kartendaten vor, wodurch die sich falschen Reihenfolgen quasi per copy&paste verbreiten.

Dann werde ich mal mit Overpass-Turbo nach den falschen Einträgen schauen… Ich vermute, dass sich da noch ein paar eingeschlichen haben.

Gruß,
Thomas
mueschel (2022-03-02 17:35:47+00:00): Bei zusammengesetzten Tags ist JOSM wirklich nicht gut. Das hier gilt aber immer (mit nur ganz wenigen Ausnahmen):

key
[:subkey]
[:hgv|:bicycle|...]
[:lanes]
[:forward|:backward|:both_ways]
[:conditional]=*
luziferius (2022-03-02 17:51:50+00:00): destination:ref:to:forward
oder
destination:to:ref:forward?

Es ist wahrscheinlich das erste, aber 100% sicher bin ich mir da nicht…

Aber deine Erklärung hilft da schon sehr, danke dafür.
mueschel (2022-03-02 17:59:02+00:00): Genau, 'to' kommt nach dem subkey, sofern vorhanden. 

Aber das 'bicycle' hatte ich an der falschen Stelle. So ist es richtig:

destination
[:hgv|:bicycle|...]
[:subkey]
[:to]
[:lanes]
[:forward|:backward|:both_ways]
[:conditional]=*
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:14:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166205.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
eggie (2022-12-06 14:20:00+00:00): Dus omdat de chauffeur er niet door kan sluit je alles af?
Ik heb destination verwijderd.
eggie (2022-12-06 14:20:38+00:00): Dit is overigens de 2de keer dat dit hier zo werd afgesloten.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-14 07:16:06+00:00): now user is at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max-Kritic and see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5723 for block
arvdk (2022-12-05 12:29:38+00:00): Mag ik u vragen om iets gedetailleerder uw aanpassing te omschrijven?

Bovendien ben ik het oneens met uw aanpassing. Het stationsplein dat u nu tagt als alleen toegankelijk voor "bestemmingsverkeer", is ook gewoon voor doorgaand verkeer. Wat was uw reden daarvoor?
arvdk (2022-12-06 13:52:21+00:00): Zoals bij de andere foutieve toevoegingen van "motor_vehicle=destination", zal ik uw aanpassing terug draaien. Mijn navigatie stuurt me nu compleet om dit kruispunt heen.
eggie (2022-12-06 14:12:53+00:00): Een aantal changesets oa. Alkmaar waarvan één in Dordrecht heb ik ook weer aangepast.
Een reactie heb ik helaas nog niet ontvangen.
Volgens mij is het een poging om de routering van chauffeurs te beïnvloeden met als resultaat dat op veel plaatsen het gewoon niet meer routeert.
Smalle straten en scherpe bochten, tijdelijke constructions?  
Het lastige is dat door de hoeveelheid aanpassingen we nu de changesets stuk voor stuk moeten nalopen.
Het zou natuurlijk prettig zijn als mapper Bram dit zelf zou doen.
Verder zou het aan te raden zijn om het hokje aan te vinken..
“Ik zou graag hebben dat iemand mijn bewerkingen nakijkt”   

MVG
eggie
arvdk (2022-12-06 14:30:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100913057

Hier schrijft Bram dat het gaat om een route app voor vrachtwagenchauffeurs, daarvoor is hij aan het taggen. Ik ga elke dag wel een paar van de foutieve toevoegingen terugdraaien, van oud naar nieuw..
eggie (2022-12-06 14:37:17+00:00): Ben momenteel in HI Ambacht bezig. Het is allemaal gewoon fout.
Zodra een vrachtauto ergens minder makkelijk kan komen wordt de weg op slot gezet. Andersom komt helaas ook voor en staan voetpaden in een wijk massaal open voor autoverkeer.
Hopelijk geeft Bram voortaan aan of een ervaren mapper even kijkt en/of vraagt hij even om advies voor dat de routering in half Nederland stuk loopt. 

Er zijn meer belanghebbenden dan alleen de chauffeurs van een bedrijf.
eggie (2022-12-06 14:17:15+00:00): Wat is je bron in deze om deze straat af te sluiten?
Ik heb de barrier verwijderd.
Graag reactie
eggie
karson_ (2022-02-28 22:54:40+00:00): If you right click on a building, you can select the Square tool to make all of the corners 90 degrees. Alternatively, you can left click a building and press the 'Q' key.
jbohmdk (2022-05-09 05:25:19+00:00): "fixes" er ikke en god commit-comment (se wiki), de fleste ændringer i dette changeset har intet med Strandkroen at gøre.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:12:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166123.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:06:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166120.
gscholz (2022-03-03 05:47:41+00:00): Hi The_ABM,
your "adjustments" have created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-68.86330&lat=12.07185&zoom=18

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117961709

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
The_ABM (2022-03-03 07:21:13+00:00): Hi Guido,
errors have been fixed.

regards,
Glassman (2022-03-03 00:38:43+00:00): #TIP: when moving to another area to edit, save and upload your edit before moving to the next location.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117961878
Glassman (2022-03-03 00:39:41+00:00): #TIP: when deleting a business - leave the address tag so it can be reused by the next business.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117961925
Glassman (2022-03-03 00:44:10+00:00): #TIP: OSM tags do not include spaces. You could use sport=flying_trapeze or just sport=trapeze.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117962007
praeteritum (2022-07-03 22:03:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166047.
seattlefyi (2022-03-01 01:45:58+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the edits! Yes, there's an ambiguity in the tagging for small grocery stores -- if you read the wiki, there it's suggested supermarket if large enough for carts, otherwise a shop=convenience can work.
seattlefyi (2022-03-01 01:48:02+00:00): Also, a tip on address names: the tagging norm is to expand street name abbreviations (NW Gilman Blvd would be Northwest Gilman Boulevard). Thanks again!
praeteritum (2022-07-03 21:46:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123165810.
stlmapper74 (2022-03-01 01:07:50+00:00): Better*
praeteritum (2022-07-03 21:43:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123165774.
Lee Carré (2022-03-01 12:03:36+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.

Thankyou for your efforts to improve golf courses.

However, some advice & questions.

Firstly; much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Given your (CS) comment; no more than 1 golf course per changeset would be sensible 🙂.

Among other reasons, large bounding boxes cause many mappers to be notified (instead of only local ones), and make review & verification difficult.

However, I'm slightly concerned about the stated purpose of the changes (particularly by a new contributor).
While I have zero problem with or objection to OSM data being used for a game (provided the license etc. is obeyed), my concern is if the changes are primarily what's best for OSM with the likes of games being secondary, or if the changes are optimised for the intended game-use primarily (akin to http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer or what's done by some Pokémon Go! players).
Could you elaborate on this point?

You may wish to peruse http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_practice for more background.
BrennanRv (2022-03-01 12:27:05+00:00): Hi, I had no idea that the comment I selected from a previous course edit would classify the new course as being part of an old change set! I am so sorry that this has happened. I think open street map could make the comment selection process a bit more transparent in that regard. The changes I've been making to individual courses have not effected the actual courses and in most cases have made the splining much more accurate. But at the very least I had assumed that I wouldn't be intentionally upsetting any other users with my changes because I made the changes on different days, different times and at different locations. Now I know that the auto comment selection is actually directly linked to the change set geography. 

The use of OSM for golf course is a very large community and ongoing thing. For further information I suggest googling Lidar imports for TGC 2019 (game) and Chad's Tools for TGC 2019. The changes made by course designers will be kept within the boundaries of the course and are only ever improving the accuracy of the splining and map features within those golf course boundaries. Things like footpaths that are actually golf walking paths or golf cart paths. Correcting these not only benefits the import into the game, but also makes the OSM for that location even more accurate. After all it's imperative that LIDAR data and OSM data align as closely as possible to achieve a satisfactory course design on golf simulators and games. 

Hope my long winded reply helps to clarify your concerns. And once again, thank you for pointing out this huge area changeset. I had no idea that was happening.

I'm grateful for you explaining how these changesets work.
Lee Carré (2022-03-01 12:39:52+00:00): “I'm slightly concerned about the stated purpose of the changes” & “if the changes are optimised for the intended game-use primarily”

Seems that my concerns & suspicions were well-founded; see the discussion of http://www.osm.org/changeset/117198630 .
BrennanRv (2022-03-01 13:50:53+00:00): Good news is that now you've read my polite comment, investigated the full features of open street maps (especially the golf course ones) I'm utilising and googled how thousands of golfers over the past decade have utilised OSM for TGC games and Official simulator uses at the golf clubs themselves. So I don't see what your problem is. Your suspicions are are worthwhile investigating because like you said, some people have used OSM to edit everyday features like roads and paths to use with Pokemon Go! Golfer's editing just the golf courses shouldn't effect the integrity of the maps used by everyone else.

Hope this further explanation is enough to pacify your concern.
BrennanRv (2022-03-01 15:56:51+00:00): It seems to me that your main concern is with the accuracy of the changes in which case you will see I have spent a long time making sure they are very accurate. I have not imported any data to OSM. I have exported golf course areas from OSM ready for import into the course designer used. This is quite a common practice whether you like it or not. Your comments seem to insinuate that I am making changes to the golf course features that contradict what's actually there. That couldn't be further from the truth as was evidenced by BCNorwich's comment on my cayman golf course edit. Telling me off for not calling a sand trap a natural 'sand' feature.

As for splining, I'm actually amazed you think that's a golfing terminology. You can use a dictionary for that term. It's the very process OSM uses to edit feature using areas, lines etc. For someone who seems to know so much and takes so much time to enforce rules of OSM editing, then I'd expect you to know what splining is.

Anyhow, the only mistake I've made is not realising the change set spanned an enormous area of Europe! And that was completely not intentional. As I've stated before I always click save after editing the golf courses so I wasn't expecting half the UK to be included in the changes made to anfi tauro! So I will double check each changeset is specific to that area each time I save. But I have nothing to apologise for with regard to the changes I've made. I use OSM editor for the changes I make and if they supply fairways, greens and sand trap features as a valid feature then I am well within the rules to use those feature tags.

End of discussion as far as I'm concerned.

Take care
Lee Carré (2022-03-09 19:32:03+00:00): If you don't have time to justify your changes, then you don't have time to make any other changes.

I'll keep to the point, then: what is the source (or sources) of your changes?
If you're not willing to honestly answer that, then you're not engaging in good faith. Thus to then complain that others treat you with caution, is unreasonable.
Claims & assertions, even with a pinky-promise, don't count.
Why? Besides verifying that your changes reflect reality, also to verify that copying from proprietary sources didn't happen (again, similar to Wikipedia).

Example of where concern comes from: http://www.osm.org/changeset/118250223

In terms of review; you don't get to decide (or, rather, your opinion on the matter holds little to no weight) what feedback or questions are constructive or not.
If you don't recognise the purpose, then that's on you.

If you're not willing to engage, constructively, then you leave the only option remaining as escalation to those with administrative clout. Best of luck with that.
BrennanRv (2022-03-10 19:29:47+00:00): Lee, this just isn't a healthy way to exist. That was painful to read and I don't mean the quality of your English. But to converse with you is like throwing petroleum onto the fires of Dresden. I feel for you I really do. I also admire your commitment to quoting, sources and stuff. It's remarkable how much effort you're willing to put into dismantling every minor detail of a person's response. I'm just telling you how and why I'm using OSM. I don't want your sympathy, I don't want your condescending drone of an essay either. You've given me some helpful tips along the way, written roughly 30,0000 word dissertation in your combined comments and spoken to me like a child which says more about your personality than mine! 😂 When thinking of you and your soft mallet, quite a few profanities come to mind, not that I'm willing to lower myself to your level on that front. But yeah, im exhausted reading your droning on. It's relentless.

I haven't intentionally ignored your question, but perhaps misunderstood your definition of source. For me, it's fairly simple because I just use iD editor to add golf course features by either using Bing maps, or whatever map is most accurate to what I've seen in recent visits to that course. Usually within the past day or two at most. Mind you I could just be saying all this about what my sources are and then you could say prove it!

But I think you've done your very best to get your point across to me and I have done my best to read your disproportionately wordy responses and take you serious. I could accuse you of being a troll. One could draw similarities with you and Fonejacker! Maybe you just want me to be on OSM comments constantly wasting my life chatting to a boring and patronising man such as yourself. Or maybe you just want to know my sources!

Anyway, enjoy this splattering of petroleum on your enormous blaze of words!

Unbelievable
praeteritum (2022-07-03 21:38:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123165625.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 21:34:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123165619.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 21:29:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123165483.
ivanbranco (2022-03-01 16:41:17+00:00): Ola Qualhano,

place=Ribeirão Capixaba it's an invalid place value, maybe you wanted to use addr:place?
praeteritum (2022-07-03 21:26:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123165459.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 21:25:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123165449.
user_12531033 (2022-03-01 00:16:59+00:00): 站内的轨道不要写xxx站xx道，在track_ref里面指明即可。
顺带，轨道我多加了几个点……要不然看起来是个折线我有些憋得慌23333
praeteritum (2022-07-03 21:24:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123165427.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 21:23:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123165423.
lololailo (2022-03-01 10:19:13+00:00): Que gran trabajo! Gracias
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117963040
WoodWoseWulf (2022-03-03 23:30:53+00:00): Hi Keegan,

You seem to be using park tagging to a lot of places that it doesn't really belong (such as in this case where you added it to a building).

Have you checked out the OSM wiki yet? There's a lot of great information about tagging standards there

This is the OSM wiki page for leisure=park:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
praeteritum (2022-07-03 21:22:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123165341.
PierZen (2022-03-02 18:25:44+00:00): Ce revert est encore incomplet. Je constate qu'il y a encore des portions manquantes près de l'ïle-d'Orléans (chenail Saint-Thomas et de Beaujeu ?). Il est possible d'ajouter les noms pour des chenaux ou baies avec un point plutot qu'un polygone. Vos modifications multiples le long de la cote est du Canada et au Nunavut  multiplient les problèmes à mon avis.
DENelson83 (2022-03-02 20:28:33+00:00): My intended goal was to give every single body of seawater in Canada an area definition, and now you are asking me to renege on that goal.  I am sorry, but I cannot.
DENelson83 (2022-03-02 21:36:51+00:00): And I have stated numerous times that I am willing to maintain this dataset of area definitions, so as to minimize trouble incurred by other editors.  They can edit the coastline data as they see fit without having to worry about this dataset.
PierZen (2022-03-03 12:48:57+00:00): Je prévois réviser le polygone de l'Estuaire tel qu'il était au départ. Si vous n'êtes pas d'accord avec cela, il faudra en référer au Data Working Group de l'OSMF.
DENelson83 (2022-03-03 16:20:24+00:00): Then let the record show that you believe this part of the St. Lawrence River to be freshwater and not seawater, and I will just have to leave it at that.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 21:17:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123165274.
evo_evz (2022-07-06 02:13:55+00:00): Why did you separate the library from its building? I just added it back but was thinking I'm sure it use to be anyway so investigated and found you separated it. Thanks