piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bhietsch (2022-05-05 20:04:05+00:00): Hi Dufekin, you've made a lot of very questionable edits around the State College area that can be considered vandalism. Can you please explain why you've made a very large prison ground that covers forest and residential areas? Converted a wastewater plant into a park? Converting roads into a bus guideway? There's several more that make no sense. Please reply soon or I will take it upon myself to revert your edits.
marczoutendijk (2022-05-06 08:05:40+00:00): Hi dufekin,
May I remind you of this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5445
You still are not very active when it comes to answering questions from others.
In addition, your changeset comments could be more specific than just an indication of where you are making your edits.
We would like to know "what" you are editing!
Please read this (and act accordingly):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
pkoby (2022-05-07 15:21:59+00:00): I was going to comment on this as well. I'm sure that the prison is the owner of the land that is now tagged as a prison, but I don't believe that the majority of the land fits the definition of a prison, especially the giant bit on the mountain (I've been in that area without knowing it was owned by the prison). My opinion is that the land should be tagged as operated by SCI Rockview, and the actual walled areas as prisons.
SamuelTheCamel (2022-10-12 23:03:34+00:00): I'm going to go ahead and remove these edits since he hasn't responded in 6 months. Maybe they correspond to property boundaries, but I doubt it.
SamuelTheCamel (2022-10-13 02:47:11+00:00): Turns out these things are extremely hard to remove and take forever to do so. I'll leave fixme requests in case anyone has the time or know-how to remove these
dufekin (2023-08-28 23:30:20+00:00): The large prison area covered the entire grounds of the prison.  I'm not sure how the state prison used the expansive grounds (water system, work areas, sewage system, gardens for agriculture, security perimeter, guard housing, wilderness survival experiences, and more are possibilities).  

The wastewater plant probably got the "park" tag to make it show on the map.  Wastewater plants now show on the map with a nice splotch of color, so that's no longer appropriate (if it ever was).  The "bus guideway" probably was a bus-only area, although I don't see it, so I'm not sure.
bhietsch (2023-08-29 00:48:32+00:00): Please read over these wiki articles before making any more edits. While I'm sure the intent was not malicious, these edits and many like it do not align with best practices in the OSM community. Most notably, it is discouraged to not "map for the renderer", i.e. creating features or adding tags so the features will be visible. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
MWXNG (2022-04-28 13:30:13+00:00): thanks for your edits. the layering issue you tried to fix can be rectified by making the woods a multipolygon - the outer boundary is an "outer" and the water body in the woods is an "inner": see here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon and compare the examples to my edits that fixed your problem https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120306381

josm is a very good tool for dealing with multipolygons, i've no idea how easy it is with iD (the web editor you use) though. good luck and happy mapping!
MWXNG (2022-04-28 13:44:09+00:00): it's also best practice not to connect something like a water body to the adjacent path / bridge / road etc, so i shifted the pond away from the bit with the bridge, to the south of the pond. this is not a clear cut rule though, see here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes
abakus_uploader (2022-04-25 22:31:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
nilodo (2023-01-25 21:47:02+00:00): En nog eentje:
https://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=90&error=134755389

En zo zijn er meerdere meldingen in de regio.

Succes, F.
ovruni (2022-04-26 07:24:06+00:00): Hola, la etiqueta group no es una etiqueta de OSM. Si tiene dudas sobre las etiquetas de OSM puede revisar la documentación de OSM. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Map_Features
Saludos
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-06 17:20:06+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9692192973/history has shop = refurb that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What is being refurbished here? Is it some repair shop?
eggie (2022-04-26 18:32:23+00:00): Dag Issa.. Je maakt grote vlakken parkeerterrein (Dubbelhof) .  Maar dat is niet de werkelijkheid. Gewoon alleen niet vlakken intekenen 
parking=street_side is dan correct en dan kun je toevoegen parking:orientation=perpendicular of diagonal.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-26 18:29:20+00:00): Tip... Die parkeerruimte niet vastmaken aan de hoofdrijbaan. Het is aangepast. Ik heb nog parking:orientation=perpendicular toegevoegd. 
Gr eggie
4004 (2022-04-29 22:36:40+00:00): name:ru, пожалуй, должен быть на кириллице, иначе зачем
VictorIE (2022-04-26 08:18:28+00:00): Hi,

This https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054726465 should probably be two parallel ways, not one on top of another.
user_5359 (2022-05-03 08:28:19+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1054727607 (one of three). What is the meaning of the tag sa = hi?
gscholz (2022-05-03 08:36:03+00:00): Hi  user_5359,
thanks for this hint, error is fixed.
Guido
user_5359 (2022-05-03 08:41:20+00:00): Hi Guido,

you miss https://www.osm.org/way/1054637700, https://www.osm.org/way/1055098626.

Same way?
gscholz (2022-05-03 08:59:46+00:00): Errors are fixed.
Guido
eggie (2022-04-26 18:26:27+00:00): Issa.. Lijkt me oke zo..
Gr eggie
habi (2022-04-26 14:00:09+00:00): Ciao SF23

Da das Gebäude im Bau ist, würde ich es nicht als `building=yes` eintragen, sondern als `construction:building=apartments`, d.h. gemäss https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Ich habe das im Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120214581 so gemacht, damit das Gebäude noch nicht gerendert wird...

Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
shykawaiiguy (2022-04-26 02:46:35+00:00): I'd been studied here. This is a square, not a circle or uneven circle. And if I'm not wrong, the road with a gate in front of here is located slightly to the right
ravali_78 (2022-04-26 11:19:08+00:00): Hi  shykawaiiguy,

I hope your doing well! I made alignment/geometry changes based on ground truth and i have removed layer=-1 tag.Thanks for the observation and we will take care for further edits.

Thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120167213
user_177389 (2022-04-25 15:23:42+00:00): Hello,

I've reverted this changeset.

You deleted a lot of ways and their nodes without paying attention to the relations involved. This damaged them. The coastline was also affected.

Best regards,
Mario
andershl (2022-04-25 20:22:15+00:00): Very weird. Undetected and unintended . Particularly because the vast majority of such was created and has always been maintained by me. Unknowing what may have happened.

Thanks for detecting before further damage happened.....
marczoutendijk (2022-04-25 18:57:03+00:00): Please note:
You have the trees of the surrounding wood bleeding thru in the lake because you didn't use a proper multipolygon for the wood and lake combination.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon
CorruptComputer (2022-04-25 19:30:54+00:00): Ah, you're right. Thanks for letting me know, I'll fix that now.
CorruptComputer (2022-04-25 19:53:43+00:00): The river area to the south that already existed had the same issue as well, had to split the way to fix it, but that's fixed now as well.
marczoutendijk (2022-04-25 20:07:00+00:00): Great, looks much better!
Pt873 (2022-04-25 17:18:57+00:00): Olá, essa via foi recém construída para servir de acesso ao hospital.
martien-176 (2022-04-25 15:43:03+00:00): Hi, you requested a review here. Well mapped but please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. Keep also in mind that the imagery is somewhat distorted. Please check out this article on how to handle this: https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/#satellite-imagery-distorting-the-building-shape -- If you see a building is incorrect, do not delete it. Try to move it to the right location and/or adjust its shape. -- You mapped a grassland here. Remember we are only mapping buildings/roads in this project. This is detailed in the project instructions. Thanks, keep up the good work and keep mapping! Kind regards, Martien (global validator).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120168017
nevw (2022-04-25 22:16:14+00:00): Hi
the name is for name only.
You can use a description tag to give other information.
totera (2022-04-28 00:24:07+00:00): Hi, traffic signals at node 9196564404 are still there
Đuro Jiří (2022-04-28 06:38:06+00:00): Esatto, il semaforo è qui, ma è un passaggio pedonale controllato da semafori.  Secondo me è sufficiente un solo semaforo.
totera (2022-04-28 15:34:57+00:00): La mappatura con un singolo nodo è accettabile ed è meglio di niente, ma quella con tre nodi è ancora più precisa; se trovi che altri utenti l'hanno utilizzata non dovresti eliminarla. Vedi anche https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#How_to_map_(new)
eggie (2022-12-06 15:03:19+00:00): Deze doorsteken bestaan helemaal niet volgens mij?
Kun je bevestigen dat hier nog een kruispunt is?
eggie
eggie (2022-12-06 15:05:50+00:00): Kruising aangepast De zuidelijke doorsteek is een fietspad.
GPar (2022-04-26 09:54:38+00:00): A firestation can't be an hangar. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/217174089#map=18/38.78011/-9.13224
user_5359 (2022-04-27 13:49:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osmorg/way/391881121. What is the meaning of the tag Q26530677 = Q59365339?
DaveD (2022-04-27 15:06:41+00:00): Thanks - it was an error on my part. It was supposed to be wikidata = Q26530677. I've corrected it now.
Strubbl (2022-04-25 16:38:37+00:00): Hallo SebasMVcycle, vielleicht möchtest du statt dem Key condition lieber smoothness verwenden? Der letztere findet auch Beachtung bei zB. brouter oder anderen Fahrradroutern.

Mehr Infos findest du im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness

Viele Grüße
Sven
Map-Peter (2022-04-27 00:10:37+00:00): Hallo SebasMVcycle,
 
willkommen bei OSM! :-)
 
Bitte nutze "condition" nicht mehr - siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:condition?uselang=de
(Wenn du Hilfe bei der Übersetzung dieses Wiki-Artikels brauchst, gib mir hier eine kurze Info - unser Wiki hat seit ein paar Stunden technische Probleme ...)
 
Ansonsten schließe ich mich Sven an -> "smoothness" verwenden.
 
Gruß Peter
Herrieman (2022-04-26 16:14:39+00:00): Hi, please add new tags to the existing address node (in this case https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2733771611).
Also, I think the name you used is not according to general consensus. I would suggest the name "Picnic" everywhere, as the location can be derived from, well, its location. As locations do not differ significantly, they all serve the same purpose, adding city to the name doesn't really serve a purpose. Also "BV" is generally left out.
I also made a post about your edits on the Dutch forum, since it was recently discussed there and you made a lot of edits throughout the Netherlands: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=861120#p861120
It would be nice if you could comment there!
KVI0n (2022-04-28 16:59:33+00:00): Hi, thank you, I read all the information from the forum and passed it to my management for further decision-making. 
Best regards.
Liliya
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-04-25 15:00:04+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 119085319, 119085494, 119312150, 119312336, 119312480, 119324047, 119324110, 119324121, 120022724, 120022815, 120022935.
JoeMapsTheWorld (2022-04-26 00:27:16+00:00): Hey, most of the buildings in the Princeton area are now overlapped with other buildings, is there a reason?
marczoutendijk (2022-04-26 07:51:20+00:00): Can you point me to a specific building?
user_5359 (2022-04-27 04:14:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the tag payment:finanziamento = yes?
kontemau (2022-04-27 07:07:56+00:00): It means that you can finance your purchase.
ivanbranco (2022-04-27 19:48:06+00:00): Ciao kontemau, benvenuto su OSM :)

ti segnalo dei piccoli problemi però:
- il separatore di valori su OSM è il punto e virgola, quindi i valori di brand dovrebbero essere "Cube;Cannondale;Merida;Megamo; Bianchi" ecc.
- l'indirizzo su OSM per convenzione lo inseriamo come nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso o della targhetta col numerino, non come tag dell'intero edificio
- su OSM per convenzione i tag sono in inglese britannico, quindi "payment:finanziamento" non va bene.
- anche i value di sport vanno in inglese, quindi ciclismo non va bene, essendo inoltre una ripetizione di "bike"

Se hai domande chiedi pure, buon proseguimento su OSM e buon mapping :)
bisonprarieafternoon (2022-04-25 14:57:25+00:00): sport=shot-put would be a valid tag if they are for shotput, could also just leave them as a genetic pitch for now if your unsure.
eggie (2022-04-26 18:24:45+00:00): Dag Issa.. Ik heb het fietspad even aangepast conform de wiki van OSM naar G13
Kijk even hier welke tags op een fietspad horen..
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

MVG
eggie
drkt (2022-04-25 14:46:25+00:00): The correct comment should've been:
Added and corrected details to Bygholm Bakker
NieWnen (2022-04-25 18:10:57+00:00): Taka linia już istnieje, ta edycja była niepoprawna. Wycofałem.
eggie (2022-04-26 07:43:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
BCNorwich (2022-04-25 18:53:53+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You placed your info for number 29 on the overall landuse area. I've removed the data and placed it on what I think is the correct house. Please check.

Regards Bernard.
Vinber-Pro (2022-04-26 16:24:19+00:00): Salut toi,
c'est pas mal le sud-ouest non :)

Bonne journée (oui ceci est un commentaire peu utile, si ce n'est le plaisir de dire bonjour !)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120170506
simon_geovelo (2022-04-27 06:46:18+00:00): salut
merci à toi pour l'invitation ;-)
danieldegroot2 (2022-04-25 19:29:12+00:00): Hey there,

I have reverted your changes in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120180562
as there are unverifiable (non-physical, no source specified).

Specify a source for your changes from which can be concluded these are physical objects, please.

Regards,

Daniel
Polarbear (2023-12-20 23:18:29+00:00): Hallo Friednauerin,
warum hast du bei dem Viking-Objekt das amenity-tag vom community_centre enfernt?
Friednauerin (2023-12-21 14:51:50+00:00): Niemand hat [community_centre : club_home] entfernt; zuletzt bearbeitet vor etwa einem Jahr von BER319.
Polarbear (2023-12-22 20:14:49+00:00): Hm, es warst schon du, die in Version 8 "amenity=community_centre" entfernt hast, schau hier:
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/305168759
 
Nebenbei gefragt, hast du mal geschaut ob der Verein dort noch sitzt? Die Webseite scheint tot, einen Instagram-Account scheint es noch zu geben...
Friednauerin (2024-01-20 09:54:49+00:00): Interessant, was es da so alles gibt  ;-) (also ich meine den Link zu dem Änderungsprotokoll), danke.

Webseite und Verein (laut Vereinsregister, falls es je einen solchen Verein gegeben haben sollte) gibt es nicht mehr, aber augenscheinlich treffen sich ein paar Biker ab und zu dort und das Gelände wird auch von einem Kleintransportunternehmer (Bauschuttcontainer-Transport) genutzt, momentan könnte der Eintrag meines Erachtens einfach bleiben.
jeslop (2022-04-25 16:34:18+00:00): Saludos Arnau RG y bienvenido a OSM, gracias por unirte. 

Esta edición tiene unas geometrías extrañas (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/939607363, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665046473, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/639671462) que no se corresponden con la realidad ni con la fuente que has utilizado.

Te recomiendo que leas esta guía de iniciación antes de seguir editando: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

Igualmente has cartografiado una zona de aparcamiento con una etiqueta landuse=residential que no es correcta. Estas son las etiquetas que se utilizan:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Estacionamiento

Revierto el cambio para que puedas hacerlo correctamente.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:35:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
eggie (2022-04-26 07:13:44+00:00): Tip.. Als het goed is zijn er al adresnodes aanwezig na import vanuit het kadaster. Je hooft dus geen nieuwe adressen aan te maken.
De key  kvk   lijkt me geen valide tag. We taggen internationaal en kvk is een Nederlandse afkorting.

Volgens mij kan deze beter weg. 
Wel kun je description gebruiken. 
Vraag het anders even op het forum van OSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2022-04-26 18:16:45+00:00): Hello! You can use ref:NL:kvk to make the content of this key more understandable to others.

Hallo! Je kunt ref:NL:kvk gebruiken om de inhoud van deze sleutel begrijpelijker te maken voor anderen.
koopfloop (2022-04-26 18:56:34+00:00): Dankjewel, ik wist niet dat die bestaat.
ChehrehBargi (2022-11-20 16:38:56+00:00): Thanks to dear @kiaraSh-Q
It is really difficult and tiring to arrange a park with this size.
Do not be tired
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:33:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
impiaaa (2022-04-26 02:41:25+00:00): Reverted in changeset  120171765
impiaaa (2022-04-26 02:42:07+00:00): OpenStreetMap is a shared map for everybody where everybody must follow the tagging standards. Spam is not welcome.
Vinber-Pro (2022-04-26 16:21:57+00:00): Salut Fanny,
attention ici sur la clé tu as fait ref : FR: CRTA, il y a des espaces autour des 2 points alors qu'il n'en faut pas :)

j'espère que tu n'en as pas trop ajouté, tu me le signales si c'est le cas, pour que je puisse faire une mise à jour rapide.

à plus
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120171968
Fanny OTLAS (2022-04-27 10:30:44+00:00): Non je suis au début. Merci pour l'info.
eggie (2022-04-26 07:48:07+00:00): Dag cthru.. De uitzonderingen voor verkeer dat tegen de richting in mocht heb ik ook verwijderd.
Er is nog een foutmelding, maar dat vraag ik wel aan de OV mappers.
MVG
eggie
cthru (2022-04-26 08:30:39+00:00): Heel goed, dankjewel voor de feedback.
Leo Slager (2022-04-26 08:40:12+00:00): Ook de tag destination moet dan gewijzigd worden:
destination:forward=...........
ملاك ساقط (2022-05-03 15:27:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
user_7073950 (2022-04-25 15:45:30+00:00): https://www.ausl.pr.it/download_2022_comunicato_stampa_43.pdf?h=423f09bc8e4f3cb70c2671f822f745440e0d342d
watmildon (2023-06-23 21:19:14+00:00): Hello!

I was adding address data into this area from the National Address Database file and some of the addresses you have as addr:city="Sun Lakes", have now been updated to "Chandler". I'm not local enough to know make a precise call on this and would love any feedback you have. Happy to update things around here as necessary.

Thanks!
Jon Hanson (2023-06-24 01:02:14+00:00): Sun Lakes is an unincorporated area and not an official city like Chandler, but is still a valid city name as far as mailing addresses go. For instance, if you search for Palo Verde Golf Course in the middle of the change-set, you'll see it's city listed as Sun Lakes.
Jon Hanson (2023-06-24 01:04:24+00:00): I don't live in Sun Lakes but I live just a few miles east of there so I'm very familiar with the area.
watmildon (2023-06-24 03:30:54+00:00): That's great! I'm always happy to get a bit of an assist from folks on the ground. I see that the ZIP locator on USPS also lists both.

So I think my plan will be to finish the additions from NAD for this area (avoiding any further overwriting), then sample addresses from company websites and the USPS address lookup to get a sense where the boundary is and make the Chandler/Sun Lakes update en masse. I'll also post over in the OSMUS Slack to see if another AZ mapper can double check. Does that seem sensible?

For full context, I'm about 60% done with this project: https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/377. I should be able to get through the plan up above by mid next week.

Let me know if you have thoughts/concerns. I appreciate the response!
watmildon (2023-06-24 03:35:11+00:00): Of course I post this and immediately think about looking at the admin boundaries to see if that's a sensible way to distinguish things. I'll try that tomorrow afternoon.
watmildon (2023-06-24 03:38:10+00:00): Leaving this here as another breadcrumb for me. Sorry for the spam! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_Lakes,_Arizona
watmildon (2023-06-26 04:14:55+00:00): Had some extra time this weekend. I think the address data has now been all added and corrected in this changset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137772589

Definitely let me know if you seem something amiss. I've also posted in the OSM US Slack (arizona local channel) asking for a set of eyes to make sure it's all good to go.
habi (2022-04-26 14:08:23+00:00): Ich hab' den Tippfehler "Operator" zu "operator" korrgiert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120214678
WoodWoseWulf (2022-04-26 00:23:54+00:00): Hi Trinity,

Please make better use of your changeset comments in order to help other mappers understand what you are doing.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
sanch3z (2022-04-25 20:12:13+00:00): Ging wohl um die Relation #7525533, da stimmt die Reihenfolge von den Segmenten nicht wirklich, sollte sich jemand ortskundiges vll. mal anschauen. Wenn du Nodes zu Segmenten von so einer fehlerhaften Relation hinzufügst, dann warnt iD dich (zurecht) davor, hast aber nix falsch gemacht. Dein Changeset ist einwandfrei, außer dass du den highway=service vielleicht mit service=parking_aisle taggen könntest :)