piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
bk1_168 (2023-06-12 06:29:17+00:00): Hi,
danke für die Antwort. Ich werde es nochmal überprüfen, und wenn das so ist, wie Du sagst, setze ich es auf Trunk.
Danke für Deinen Beitrag.
Herzliche Grüße bk1_168
rskedgell (2023-02-01 16:03:04+00:00): These aren't "unmarked crossings", but entirely fictitious crossings. Mapping for the router is generally a bad idea, but adding fake crossing over main roads is irresponsible.

What were you asked to do in respect of this project and what feedback, if any, did you get from the user who "validated" your edits?
https://tasks.waymap.tech/projects/5
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127892674
Mazda05 (2022-10-25 00:54:53+00:00): в связи с чем удаляете актуальные данные? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmilitary
В целях безопасности местоположение военных объектов крайне важно
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 15:07:35+00:00): Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 4A è errato. Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 13:42:37+00:00): grazie, risolto. Saluti, Martin
MxxCon (2022-10-21 20:18:14+00:00): Hello.
You deleted a section of path in the park. Could you elaborate on that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127893012
wilfisher (2022-10-21 21:28:47+00:00): Hi @MxxCon yes of course - the section I deleted has pavement that abruptly ends and ceases to be passable (thick underbrush). From the aerial photo it can appear that the paved path continues under trees, but in fact does have a break in which people divert to the adjacent path and go around. Confirmed in person. Thx!
John Kastner (2022-10-21 23:59:19+00:00): `landuse=commercial` on the USDA fields feels wrong. Is it generally the case that agricultural facilities are considered commercial landuse in OSM? 

I may be making a hasty judgement because of the less pleasant rendering, but the tag does seems semantically wrong.
ElliottPlack (2022-10-22 00:12:08+00:00): Oh, you could be right! I was looking for a good fit too but there isn’t a great “landuse”=governmental. If you look in Berlin or something they have the govt offices but USDA is so big it doesn’t really fit that. I’m fine if you want to just remove it. Maybe it’s a nature reserve?
gs3§zba (2022-10-25 17:58:20+00:00): Hallo aye_cpt, vielen Dank für deine vielen Verbesserungen. Wäre super, wenn du bei neu fertiggestellten Häusern gleich auch noch die Adresse eintragen würdest.
aye_cpt (2022-10-27 16:33:37+00:00): Hey, hätte ich auch gerne gemacht. Leider führt zu dem Haus nur ein Privatweg hin (oder er sah zumindest nicht offiziell aus) und aus der Ferne konnte ich leider keine Hausnummer erkennen.
gs3§zba (2022-10-27 18:57:29+00:00): Hm, da müssen Leute wohnen, denen es egal ist, ob der Lieferdienst sie findet. Die Glücklichen. - Danke für deine Antwort!
EP2021 (2022-10-21 23:25:08+00:00): My apologies for the large area this covered. I was uploading each new addition separately, so I'm not sure why OSM Go or OSM decided to cluster them together as one edit.
Mazda05 (2022-10-24 23:49:01+00:00): в чём заключаются вандальные правки?
eggie (2022-10-21 20:21:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mazda05 (2022-10-24 23:50:14+00:00): в чём заключаются вандальные правки?
Carto'Cité (2023-03-01 14:48:14+00:00): Bonjour frutruc,
J'ai vu que tu avais fait des contributions avec StreetComplete sur les aménagements cyclables et il y avait quelques erreurs que j'ai corrigées pour info. Elles concernent ces 2 aménagements : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689228048
Si tu penses que c'est moi qui me trompe n'hésite pas à me dire 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
frutruc (2023-03-13 10:51:09+00:00): Bonjour Charles, j'ai bien constaté sur pl
frutruc (2023-03-13 10:53:56+00:00): Bonjour Charles, 
J'avais bien constaté sur place le DSC signalé au sol et par des panneaux.
C'est aussi présent sur google street view : https://goo.gl/maps/VPZA1Fam4EbvtBtQ7
Carto'Cité (2023-03-13 10:57:43+00:00): Oui et pour cette route j'ai dû m'emmêler les pinceaux car effectivement la description était bonne. J'ai dû confondre avec autre chose. Bon je rétablis avec le DSC en bande. Pardon pour le dérangement et merci encore pour ton retour :)
Charles
Carto'Cité (2023-03-13 11:00:02+00:00): Ha mais non après vérification c'est bien ce que je pensais. Pour cette route : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689228048
Le sens de circulation des cyclistes est bien le même que celui des véhicules à moteur et il ne s'agit donc pas d'un DSC. C'est bien ce qu'on voit sur la photo il me semble.
Charles
frutruc (2023-03-13 16:15:32+00:00): Sur la vue google, on voit que le DSC est prolongé également pour cette route https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689228048, les travaux sont en cours en juillet : https://goo.gl/maps/99c44xHiQDHicFqN8
Je suis passé en octobre, je pourrai essayer de passer vérifier à l'occasion.
Carto'Cité (2023-03-21 08:38:39+00:00): D'accord effectivement. Merci encore pour ton retour. Tu as parfaitement raison, il y a bien un DSC. Pardon d'avoir douté ; j'ai cru que tu avais pris la bande cyclable pour une bande à DSC alors qu'elle est dans le même sens que la circulation des voitures. C'est une configuration atypique, en général la bande est utilisée pour le DSC et pas l'inverse alors je me suis fait avoir. Je vérifie les infos dans OSM et éventuellement corrige si nécessaire.
À ta disposition pour tout échange.
Charles
frutruc (2023-04-01 14:07:44+00:00): Bonjour, je suis passé sur place. Il y a bien deux bandes sur cette voie, une dans le sens unique, et une autre pour le DSC
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 20:29:49+00:00): Hello,

You removed the road tagging from Babbitt Road and South Drive in this changeset. I have restored those tags.
AleksN27 (2022-10-21 20:36:52+00:00): Thank you. I accidentally removed the tags and tried to retag them and I must've not uploaded the retag. Thank you
aTarom (2022-10-22 05:59:15+00:00): Hola Gregorio Becerra Navarro
en el conjunto de cambios figura PNOA Spain como imagen usada, en este elemento
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105848085/history
no se puede apreciar ningún contorno  que se le parezca a la forma trazada, tiene alguna explicación que no soy capaz de ver?
Saludos
Mazda05 (2022-10-24 23:50:18+00:00): в чём заключаются вандальные правки?
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 14:32:30+00:00): please make sure the mapped object/ structure is the building before tagging it
thank you for mapping, please keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127894513
snoozingnewt (2022-10-27 20:55:33+00:00): Hi, what source are you using for these roads? They sure don't seem to be existent on Maxar, which is the imagery you used.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 20:24:10+00:00): Hello,
Does Red Pine Run Park also include the Disc Golf Course and baseball fields?
I noticed you also added a park over St Pius Catholic Church - this does not appear to be a park.
AleksN27 (2022-10-21 20:35:34+00:00): It includes the disc golf course, but the baseball fields are separate. The wooded area behind the church is a school planted forest, I could not find an appropriate tag for that area.
samuel_geovelo (2023-05-05 13:19:50+00:00): Bonjour, connaissez vous la capacité du parking vélo ainsi que le type d'accroche svp ?
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 20:30:34+00:00): You created a wildlife park here. This is not correct and the addition has been removed.
AleksN27 (2022-10-21 20:38:30+00:00): Thank you, is there a tag for a plant management area? This rest stop has an area of managed native plants for birds and insects. Is there a specific tag for these things or leave blank? I appreciate you reviewing my tags, as I am still learning OSM.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 20:46:01+00:00): leisure=nature_reserve is probably the most basic tagging you can use:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dnature_reserve

There's also the protected area tags depending on the nature of the location, but they're a little more complex: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area

My main suggestion would be to spend a bit of time on the wiki, it's really helpful :)
AleksN27 (2022-10-21 21:23:21+00:00): I'll be sure to do that. I didn't even know they had a wiki for OSM. Thank you for helping and the knowledge, it will come in handy for properly tagging my area.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 20:12:15+00:00): Hi Amy,

Welcome to OSM! When adding features like parks, it's generally better to map them up until where they stop rather than connecting them to the middle of roadways and other features like railroads.

I adjusted Middleton City Park if you wanted to take a look and see what I mean.

Also, what's the difference between Cherokee Landing Campground and the park you added there? They kind of seem to represent the same feature?
Amy Pilkington (2022-10-21 20:35:44+00:00): Thanks for the tip! All of the area is part of the Cherokee Landing campground, but the campground itself is divided into two areas - Phase 1 and Phase 2, each with different amenities and purposes. (There is a Phase 3, but it is the hiking trail area in the woods.) I wasn't sure how to represent both parts of the campground and park accurately.
Hufkratzer (2022-10-22 21:43:30+00:00): Hi, du hast bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225472855 das building=yes durch leisure=pitch ersetzt, aber im Luftbild sieht es wie ein Gebäude aus. Jedes Gebäude sollte ein building-Tag haben; falls es eine Reithalle, kannst du https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=riding_hall verwenden (dafür gibt es aber kein Preset, das muss man eintippen).
Das leisue=horse_riding (Preset "Reitanlage") ist nicht für Reithallen (oder andere Gebäude) geeignet, damit kannst du die gesamte Anlage mappen wenn du Lust hast, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 20:02:03+00:00): Hello,

Please do not add fictional features to OSM.

If you are making edits like this for Pokemon GO, Niantic has likely already pulled the data they intend to use in the recently announced update.
NieWnen (2022-10-22 09:38:39+00:00): 2 takie same piekarnie, czy pomyłka?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10119463546
Michał Paluchowski (2022-10-22 18:14:26+00:00): Dwie tej samej sieci. Jedna jest w budynku przy Postępu 14, a druga tutaj w Adgar Wave.

Upewnię się jeszcze jutro. Tzn jestem pewien, że widziałem ten lokal przy Postępu 14, ale nie widzę go teraz na liście na ich stronie.
Michał Paluchowski (2022-10-25 10:38:13+00:00): Sprawdziłem, jest też przy Postępu. Nawet kawę kupiłem. Tak więc oba lokale instnieją.
NieWnen (2022-10-25 11:25:31+00:00): Dzięki za weryfikację!
silversurfer83 (2022-10-21 20:08:28+00:00): Hi. Du hast um Review gebeten.
Die einzig wichtige Änderung ist die Verschiebung von landuse=residential nach Luftbild, oder?
Wenn du sowas änderst und einen solchen Änderungskommentar abgibst, wäre eine Quellenangabe für die Information auf der deine Änderungen beruhen hilfreich.
Hab dann nach einigem Klicken gesehen, dass auf dem Luftbild HesseDOP20 dort schon Bauvortschritte zu sehen sind. Gehe mal davon aus, dass deine Änderung dann passt :)
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127897998
kornad (2022-10-24 07:57:29+00:00): Linia tramwajowa nie została jeszcze ukończona - wciąż znajduje się w budowie. Zmiana do wycofania.
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 14:30:23+00:00): your mapping is good, please keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127898157
Frans S (2022-10-22 09:58:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. We welcome you as a new mapper.
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.
Please do not upload each mapping separately. Collect them.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127898207
gscholz (2022-11-01 08:31:43+00:00): Hi Tess2344,
your recent changesets have added errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=45.87275&lat=3.08365&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127898219

This kind of errors irritate routing software (and looks ugly on the maps). Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-21 19:56:49+00:00): Hi beachpunk!

Welcome to OSM.

Just a quick hint - you can square features in the iD editor (the map editor) by selecting them and pressing "Q" on your keyboard.
gscholz (2022-10-24 09:34:28+00:00): Hi Charles96,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines (red marker):


https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=37.63837&lat=-5.67977&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=intersection%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127898296

Obviously you have "rectangularized" a building which originally had a circular shape. Can you please fix this?

As you are using JOSM I am wondering how this could happen as JOSM typically shows warning messages if you try to upload such errors. Do you know how to use its internal validator?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-10-29 09:10:08+00:00): Hi Charles96, 
this errors are still present, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Frans S (2022-10-22 09:31:21+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Please map accurate without including spaces next to a building
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127898299
AaronFitz (2022-11-27 20:39:41+00:00): Since these service multiple residences they'd technically be service roads, driveways branch off.
Frans S (2022-10-22 09:21:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. We welcome you as a new mapper.
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
You mapped 3 pieces of land as a building.
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127898403
Frans S (2022-10-22 09:14:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Please follow the outlines of a building. 1 building you mapped has an extension, which should be included in your mapping as well. You just mapped a rectangular.

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127898474
Frans S (2022-10-22 09:12:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped accordingly.
A remark. When I take a look at the area you mapped, it seems that you mapped on several task squares in 1 session (this changeset)
Don't map outside the task square you are mapping on. Other mappers can be active on another task, which can result in duplications or errors.
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127898485
Frans S (2022-10-22 09:06:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Global Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:

* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127898487
Frans S (2022-10-22 09:03:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped accordingly.
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. You did not square a single building.
1 building has an extension which you did not include in your mapping
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127898502
Frans S (2022-10-22 08:38:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
There is no need to upload each single mapping. Collect them till you are finished with a task or just when you want to stop mapping.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127898531
Naviyan (2022-10-24 01:37:26+00:00): Thank you Frans S.
Nearby0051 (2022-10-22 12:10:49+00:00): Please dont vandalize the map
I've reverted your changesets. Further changes will be monitored.
Frans S (2022-10-22 08:36:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Global Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are rather accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points: 

In a few occasions you mapped 'swimming pools' which is wrong. When you take a close look you will see a shadow next to it, what means it is above ground level. The colour is too clear blue to be a water area.
This roof colour is not unusual. 
Please pay more attention to square the buildings.
15 out of 33 mapped buildings are not squared.
Please square each building when you have it selected with the Q key.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127898592
Dodko (2022-10-23 08:24:14+00:00): Prečo ste vymazali číslo bankomatu S6AV362O?
Rumburak7 (2022-10-28 13:54:56+00:00): Pardon, nevedel som ze to je číslo bankomatu
Dodko (2022-10-23 08:25:36+00:00): K tomu je dobré pridať, telefón, web, mail, otvárací čas (ten sa dá jednoducho pripraviť cez https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/)
Rumburak7 (2022-10-28 14:49:53+00:00): Jasne, pridam neskôr
SantsPavan (2025-06-13 13:47:37+00:00): Unverified Data
impiaaa (2022-10-22 16:53:18+00:00): Please use a changeset message to describe what you added or changed. For example, "Added camp sites". For more information, see here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Frans S (2022-11-09 14:16:06+00:00): Hello.
I noticed that you also map paths as an unclassified highway.
Use this tip to determine if a road is suitable for 4-wheel cars (unclassified highway)or narrower (path)
How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.


Best regards
Frans S (2022-11-10 12:01:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A request. When you map roads which crosses fences, and there is a gap for a path or road, please leave  the gap open and continue after it. When a road is crossing a fence, it is an error. ( GPS driven navigation systems, don't continue on these places.)
Best regards
LikiCarolina (2022-10-30 14:29:27+00:00): your mapping is good
please make sure the mapping nodes align with the building
please keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127900073
limes11 (2022-10-21 20:37:03+00:00): Müssten wir dann nicht auch die ganzen Adressknoten in Niedereich anpassen? Da sollte wohl überall addr:street dran und addr:place weg.
Oder?