piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mike Baggaley (2021-05-10 19:31:26+00:00): Could you change the tagging from highway= to old_highway= or similar, as the current tagging throws up errors because of an invalid value for highway?
brianboru (2021-05-10 19:43:01+00:00): No problems. Will do
Kpdrg (2021-12-01 20:21:46+00:00): Hallo, du hast einen Punkt mit Kircheninformationen hinzugefügt, auf deine Fläche, die schon diese Informationen und noch weitere enthält. Damit es sich nicht doppelt, werde ich es demnächst löschen, wenn du nichts dagegen hast. Lg.
DressyPear4 (2021-04-16 20:52:11+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103000442
syntex (2021-12-19 20:46:57+00:00): Dla tego obszaru nie ma MPZP. Co oznacza ten obszar oznaczony jako construction przy ulicy Pieskowa Skała?
kblazewicz (2021-12-19 21:03:35+00:00): Ten obszar został w tym roku ogrodzony stalowym płotem, a teren za nim został wyrównany. Nie znam szczegółów inwestycji. Obszar naniosłem zgrubnie na podstawie tego co zobaczyłem podczas spaceru.
syntex (2021-12-19 22:34:56+00:00): Ale dałeś jako źródło stricte tego terenu jakąś uchwałę Warszawy?
plguedes (2021-04-20 18:27:02+00:00): Cara, entendo que na base de dados abertos da Prefeitura do Recife essas vias estão indicadas como "ciclorrota", no entanto não há nenhuma sinalização nas ruas indicando isso. A região é uma "zona 30" segundo a CTTU porém a tag "shared_lane" só deve ser utilizada caso a rua tenha alguma sinalização de ciclorrota na vida real, e não há nada nessas ruas. Sugiro retirar a tag.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-04-17 10:57:23+00:00): Congratulations! You are the 500th contributor to use MapComplete.

You win absolutely nothing - except for some bragging rights.

Kind regards from the dev,
Pieter
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-15 15:18:10+00:00): Change reverted. Road classification was correct as per situation on the ground.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-10 13:31:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104455463 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'micronation' fantasy mapping.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5004 .
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-04-15 15:07:23+00:00): I believe that this road naming problem is a case fit for the old_name, alt_name and/or loc_name attributes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103002209
Kyle Spencer (2021-04-15 15:15:30+00:00): Good to know those tags exist.

The "Prince Badru Kakungulu Road" name should be the alt_name, and the primary name should be "Kibuli Road" otherwise this map will not be functional for anyone in Kampala.

I will update the road nodes accordingly.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-04-15 15:28:10+00:00): Thanks for https://osmcha.org/changesets/103002209 !
radiotrefoil (2022-03-01 10:41:09+00:00): Hi, just letting you know that water_works and wastewater_plant typically should be tagged as industrial landuse as per wiki and relevant discussion on changeset 72960184. Do you have objections to me reinstating this tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103002291
blackboxlogic (2021-04-15 17:53:58+00:00): According to https://www.maine.gov/mdot/mapviewer/ this really is Scammel Avenue
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103002531
scotteaton92 (2021-04-15 18:02:02+00:00): There's nothing on the ground there to indicate it's a road not a driveway, and the Portland tax maps ( https://portlandme.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=6208128831ea40c7a7c432317527336b ) don't include it. Also, the set back property has a Rowe Ave address. I was going by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground
benoitdd (2021-04-15 15:44:19+00:00): can someone confirm that this changeset is spam and revert it, please?
SomeoneElse (2021-04-15 16:14:30+00:00): Their diary was spam so I hid that and reported the user; I've also reverted this change.
benoitdd (2021-04-16 08:16:12+00:00): thanks!
tux67 (2021-04-15 16:24:51+00:00): Hi clsch,
der Parkplatz war schon eingetragen .. du hast jetzt einen Parkplatz im Parkplatz gemappt. Ich fixe das - keine aktion nötig.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103002880
Frans S (2021-08-13 09:38:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A few remarks. 
You changed highways tagged with residential to track.
Please check the description on the WIKI how to deal with tracks.
When they don't lead to farmland, forest, empty space, use path (<2 mtr) or unclassified. 
Another point.  Connect highways to each other.  I 'v seen paths coming together on a hamlet without connecting them 
Navigating system cannot deal with gaps in a traject.
Best regards and keep mapping
ftcat (2021-08-13 10:13:16+00:00): Hello,

The area being mapped consists mainly of small family farms, if you were to map it all as unclassified it would be 'over mapped', zoom out and see how dense this area has become with all the mapping here, much of it should not have been mapped anyway. The imagery is at least 4 years out of date so in no way represents what is on the ground. No highway here should be mapped as residential as they are not meet the criteria for being classified as such, "road lined by houses" not a road leading to a cluster of houses that are the dwelling place of the small scale farmer and his family.
Frans S (2021-08-14 08:16:13+00:00): Hello Ftcat, 
Thanks for your reaction. I presume you have local knowledge ?
We ( Validators of HOT, Armchair mappers) have to deal with the instruments we have available.
I seriously try to delever a reliable network where I, in rural areas, try to recognize  throughgoing roads, suitable for cars, and path. 
criteria for path < 2 mtr, other unclassified highway. The term unclassified includes wide local roads, but also narrow 2 track roads.  From an image it is not clear how the condition of a road is, so I only tag them as unpaved when it seems like that. It is up to mappers with local knowledge to correct them.
. If you prefer that validating should be done by validators of your team (144, I just noticed the existance of it) please let me know.
Best regards
ftcat (2021-08-14 09:05:32+00:00): Hi Frans S,

I am a local mapper, one of the very few in Zambia. The problem with using strict classifications as per the wiki for example is you are trying to apply a formal system of classification to a very informal situation on the ground. The area of this project is made up of what are termed small scale farms, the owners of these farms do not own vehicles and work the fields with mainly oxen. There are a few tractors that are owned by the wealthier farmers that will be hired out so the network of 'roads' are really wide paths close to 2m wide or more that the occasional vehicle will travel down even small Toyota Corollas. The classification of track is too ridged for parts of Africa, I have 2 pictures taken this morning, if I could send them to you somehow I doubt you would even be able to classify them from the pictures let alone from satellite imagery. 99% of the roads in this area are really wide paths made by foot and bicycle traffic with ox carts thrown in for good measure but will be used by the occasional vehicle, you would be amazed where a vehicle can go. Not all tracks will be 2 track roads, maybe on the larger commercial farms this will be the case. The constant foot traffic and seasonal nature of the Zambian climate will see to this. Also the time of year at which the image is taken will make classifying a problem, go to this point, https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=-14.7138&mlon=27.9231#map=10/-14.7138/27.9231 and have a look at the Maxar imagery. East of the point the image was taken towards the beginning of the rains, everything is greener but also the tracks are less distinct as the vegetation encroaches. West of the point is taken at the end of the dry season, images may even be taken only a few weeks apart but the difference is marked, note the tracks are more distinct, areas are burnt and paths are visible in the burn but these paths may not exist in the next year as they will disappear in the wet season. For all of these reasons I tend to use local knowledge to classify the highways and ignore the very obvious small paths.

I have no preference over validators and tend to map independently from HOT but have provided them with advice, but as you know nobody really reads the wikis or instructions.
Patchanka (2021-04-15 15:11:40+00:00): bonjour
vous avez créé un polygone nommé "Etude hydraulique" mais cette information ne semble pas avoir sa place dans Openstreetmap.
Si vous souhaitez utiliser OSM comme fond de plan et ajouter des données personnalisées dessus, je vous suggère d'utiliser Umap par exemple.
https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/
Bonne journée.
Rogoyski (2021-04-28 21:51:50+00:00): Kawałek linii metra w parku przy Świętokrzyskiej do skasowania. Co z innymi zmianami (Poznań?) nie sprawdzałem.
kasmar00 (2021-05-06 14:34:36+00:00): Poznań wygląda ok.
Kyle Spencer (2021-04-15 15:14:10+00:00): (edit description continued): the new name might be appropriate for "alt name" -- but the PRIMARY name should be Kibuli Road otherwise this map will not be functional for anyone in Kampala.
DressyPear4 (2021-04-16 20:51:10+00:00): Olá, não adicione vias por cima das que já existem.
FraukeLeo (2023-01-08 14:19:42+00:00): Hi lagekarte_eu, du hast hier einige noexit=yes auf oder neben Poller etc. in durchgehenden Straßen gesetzt. Das ist leider nicht richtig, denn Fußgänger, Reiter und Radfahrer dürfen und können da durch. Nicht nur für Autos mappen :) noexit=yes heißt: hier geht es nicht weiter, für keine Verkehrsart. Siehe auch im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:noexit
GerdP (2022-10-28 06:52:10+00:00): Hi!
Knoten 62 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/260830599 ist Mitglied in Relation "Knotenpunktsystem Oldenburger Münsterland", aber nicht in "Knotenpunktwegweisung Ammerland".
Die Routen gehören angeblich alle zu Münsterland. Ist das Tag cycle_network=Knotenpunktwegweisung Ammerland falsch?
Wulf4096 (2021-04-16 14:17:59+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103065558

please be more careful!
PT-53 (2021-04-16 07:23:27+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
zum Thema Wanderparkplatz gibt es hier eine Info:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=8309
Grüße
PT-53 (2021-04-18 07:33:44+00:00): Hallo kintetsu, 
ich habe den Wanderparkplatz an 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=815398#p815398
angepaßt.
Grüße
GerdP (2022-11-17 15:58:20+00:00): Moin!
Den Knotenpunkt mit rcn_ref=47 gibt es doppelt:
https://www.osm.org/node/271841030
https://www.osm.org/node/1977576444
Sind beide richtig?
GerdP (2022-11-18 17:59:49+00:00): Wenn ich das richtig sehe, dann ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/271841030 kein Knotenpunkt und die Route https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12419581 sollte bis zum dem anderen Knoten weiter laufen. So zeigt es zumindest die interaktive Karte bei https://www.oldenburger-muensterland.de/artikel/radwandern/knotenpunkte-radwanderkarte.php an.
M_Kucha (2022-11-19 12:18:23+00:00): Hallo Gerd,

endschuldige die lange Zeit bis zu meiner Antwort, aber die Erfassung der Knoten habe ich im Juni 2019 durchgeführt. So musste ich erst einige Bilder, die ich damals dabei dokumentiert habe, wiederfinden, um meine Erinnerung aufzufrischen. Fazit dabei: Zum damaligen Zeitpunkt gab es nur die Knotenpunkte zur Gemeinde Bösel, die Knotenpunktnetzwerke Ammerland und Co. sind erst später dazugekommen, daher kann ich zur Zuordnung der Knoten und Routen zu den Netzwerken keine aktuell sinnvollen Aussagen machen, da ich nach Juni 2019 keine Kontrollen vor Ort mehr gemacht habe.

Vier Fotos, die die damalige Situation zeigen sind von mir unter

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gemeinde_B%C3%B6sel_Knotenpunkt_47_Foto_1.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gemeinde_B%C3%B6sel_Knotenpunkt_47_Foto_2.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gemeinde_B%C3%B6sel_Knotenpunkt_45_Foto_1.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gemeinde_B%C3%B6sel_Knotenpunkt_45_Foto_2.jpg

abgelegt worden. Damit wird deutlich, das der westliche von den doppelten 47er-Knoten von mir falsch nummeriert wurde und die 45 tragen sollte. Dieser Knoten ist aber nach den Informationen der von dir genennten Radwanderkarte, die auf Fietsknoop basiert, mittlerweile wohl nicht mehr gegeben, obwohl 2019 nach den Fotos noch vorhanden. Da hilft wohl nur eine Recherche vor Ort, die ich aber aufgrund der Entfernung selbst nicht in nächster Zeit durchführen werden.

Ich hoffe, damit einige Deiner Fragen beantwortet zu haben.

CU Martin
GerdP (2022-11-19 13:35:23+00:00): Hallo Martin,
okay, danke für die Infos. Für mich ist der Knoten z.Z. auch zu weit weg, zumindest bei unter 10° C  ;)
GerdP (2022-11-19 14:36:07+00:00): Jetzt muss ich doch noch mal nachfragen: Der Knoten 45 ist ja deutlich weiter westlich:
https://www.osm.org/node/2118836386
Die beiden 47er in OSM sind nur ca. 200m voneinander entfernt.
Deine Fotos zeigen die Stelle, die ich auch für die richtige halte, genauso wie die Karten auf den Fotos. Ich werde daher den Knoten https://www.osm.org/node/271841030 aus den Relationen entfernen und die Route 47-60 entsprechend verlängern.
GerdP (2022-11-19 14:45:10+00:00): Siehe https://www.osm.org/changeset/129126738
Arlo James Barnes (2021-04-19 00:56:33+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM, I see you're already familiar with HOT :)

Thanks for adding some Arroyo Seco buildings, I was inspired to add a few more. Let me know if you see something I did that might be improved, also.

There's an NM OSMers chat in the #local-newmexico channel at https://slack.openstreetmap.us if you're interested; there'll be a video meetup on Wednesday.
Jarek 🚲 (2021-04-25 02:21:55+00:00): Housekeeping note: this has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103558118
kartonage (2021-04-16 06:37:18+00:00): Hej KelseyGoosen,

there is no need to tag descriptive Names to buildings that describe a status of a building. Buildings in OpenStreetMap are only named when it's an actual name. 

Otherwise people have to go through these houses again and remove the descriptive name.

Thank you
Cheese Gromit (2021-04-15 16:42:42+00:00): Additional comments from the creator of this changeset:

1) Trunk designation can not be justified based on form or function of this highway west of MN-41, where the divided highway ends. Elevation from secondary to primary is justified bu US road tagging guidelines, as MN-7 is the main connection from the Twin Cities to the manufacturing center of Hutchinson.

2) Per the wiki (Key:name): "Do not use name=* if... the feature is known by an address or reference number or code."

3) Per the wiki (Key:name): "Road names, especially highway names, may commemorate individuals. Depending on the region and specific case, the road name may appear prominently at every junction, or it may appear only once or twice at either end of the road, or there may be some other arrangement. In many regions, a motorway may be named but only the route number is signposted. Use the name=* tag if the name is suitable for general usage (such as for navigation); otherwise, use the official_name=* or alt_name=* tag. ". This roadway has an official name per Sec 161.14 MN Statutes ("The Theodore Christianson Memorial Drive"), but is not signed as such. Intersections in western Hennepin / eastern Carver use "State Hwy 7", "Hwy 7", or the shield symbol to indicate the roadway name.

4) Based on #2 and #3, existing name tags have been removed, and official_name tags have been added with the statutory name.
Lucia Argento (2021-04-24 18:48:38+00:00): Buon lavoro, ricordo solo di selezionare sempre ogni geometria/edificio e ortogonalizzare i lati (con il tasto Q). Grazie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103007024
Romwriter (2021-04-16 16:02:44+00:00): Hallo Puttt, vielen Dank für die Ergänzung. parking=street_side <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side> sieht auf dieser Fläche allerdings merkwürdig aus, nach Luftbild würde ich eher parking=surface für richtig halten. Einverstanden?
Lahusen (2021-04-17 05:34:29+00:00): Hallo Romwriter,
danke für Dein Feedback. Streetcomplete hat mich da in die Irre geführt. "surface" ist korrekt. Ich bin auf jeden Fall einverstanden. ;-)
Schönes Wochenende!
Romwriter (2021-04-18 08:29:40+00:00): Danke, erledigt/geändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103127606
Lucia Argento (2021-04-24 18:56:59+00:00): Ciao Pierluigi, buon lavoro ma ti ricordo di selezionale sempre ogni geometria avendo cura di ortogonalizzare sempre (con il tasto Q). Buona mappatura!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103007511
Kovoschiz (2021-04-16 07:59:03+00:00): What's wrong with `boundary=protected_area`?
Kovoschiz (2021-04-16 08:00:08+00:00): You also didn't remove `boundary=national_park`
minghong (2021-04-16 08:07:48+00:00): 具特殊科學價值地點是一項無法律支持的行政措施，設立目的是要確保各政府部門知道該地點的科學價值，在發展土地時慎重考慮環境保護的問題。
http://ubeat.com.cuhk.edu.hk/ubeat_past/000538/bird2_s.htm

nature-feature area: similar to 4. but without IUCN-level. 
Consider using plain-English tagging alternatives instead of this value:
- For geological sites, see geological=palaeontological_site
- For nature reserves, see leisure=nature_reserve
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area
Kovoschiz (2021-04-16 20:43:48+00:00): 1. By your logic following that, `leisure=nature_reserve` doesn't qualify either, with the lack of "Some habitats are protected by local- or district-law". 
2. `boundary=protected_area` doesn't require a IUCN `protect_class=` category to exist.
gscholz (2021-05-15 06:06:40+00:00): Hi Panchito_de_GDL,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of Bahía de Banderas:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-105.29276&lat=20.88557&zoom=11

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103007854

Can you please fix this?
Guido
eggie (2021-04-15 19:08:46+00:00): Leuk bedacht, maar dat gaat niet werken. Water ligt altijd onder een brug in de rendering op de 
Je zou die fontein als inner in de outer van de brug kunnen opnemen in een multipolygoon.
Dus brug outer maken en dan et water als inner toevoegen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-04-16 07:08:56+00:00): water in mp gezet
eggie (2021-04-16 07:11:32+00:00): Eigenlijk kan die brug net zo goed weg.
Het water is al als brede duiker ingetekend en het is het een of het ander.
Dan zou je de landuse op de rotonde kunnen intekenen.
Even ter leering ende vermaak de mp toegevoegd om je fontein zichtbaar te maken. Rendering duurt even
Herrieman (2021-04-17 00:12:57+00:00): Hi Eggie, thanks voor je hulp wederom! Je hebt gelijk, de brug doet zo niet wat ik wilde, dus mag eigenlijk weg. Ik wilde graag wel de naam van de (historische) brug weergeven, ookal is het nu deels een duiker geworden. Heb jij nog tips om dat alsnog te doen? 
Groeten,
Herrieman
eggie (2021-04-17 04:43:20+00:00): Hoi
Dit vind ik een lastige... 
Het is het een of het ander. Er is niet echt een brug meer. Wellicht als bridge:name= op de rotonde zetten?
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-04-17 04:44:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name
eggie (2021-04-17 04:53:23+00:00): Of zo laten en dan heet het schipperen.. :)  Officieel is het een 'duikerbrug' (een brug met een duiker) ..  Dus dat rechtvaardigt het wel.
Lucia Argento (2021-04-24 20:09:09+00:00): Ottimo lavoro Antonia!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103007941
L'imaginaire (2021-04-15 17:07:48+00:00): gebaseerd op https://www.facebook.com/events/1346566295424559
whda (2021-04-15 17:15:15+00:00): كشف تسربات المياه بإحترافية 
إن كنت تتفاجئ أن فاتورة المياه لديك مرتفعه وتقلق من ذلك الأمر فإنك حتميا تعاني من مشكلة تسرب المياه من خزانات المياه لديك مشكلة تسرب المياه من أهم المشكلات التي تعمل علي زيادة إرتفاع فاتورة المياه لديك ، لذلك مع وحدة المشاريع محترفين كشف تسربات المياه بالرياض لدينا أحدث أجهزة كشف تسريبات المياه التي تعمل علي إكتشاف تسرب المياه تحت البلاط بدون تكسير حيث أننا نستخدم أحدث أجهزة لكشف تسربات المياه وكشف تسريب الخزانات من خلال شركة معتمدة لكشف تسريبات المياه 

كشف تكتشف تسربات المياه بسهولة :
whda (2021-04-15 17:15:51+00:00): https://alarabia-sa.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d9%83%d8%b4%d9%81-%d8%aa%d8%b3%d8%b1%d8%a8%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d9%8a%d8%a7%d9%87-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%a7%d8%b6-%d9%83%d8%b4%d9%81-%d9%88%d8%a7/
whda (2021-04-15 17:16:30+00:00): https://alarabia-sa.com/%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a9-%d9%83%d8%b4%d9%81-%d8%aa%d8%b3%d8%b1%d8%a8%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d9%8a%d8%a7%d9%87-%d8%a8%d8%ac%d8%af%d8%a9-%d8%ac%d8%af%d9%87/
whda (2021-04-15 17:16:58+00:00): https://alarabia-sa.com/%d8%a7%d9%81%d8%b6%d9%84-%d8%b4%d8%b1%d9%83%d8%a9-%d9%83%d8%b4%d9%81-%d8%aa%d8%b3%d8%b1%d8%a8%d8%a7%d8%aa-%d8%a7%d9%84%d9%85%d9%8a%d8%a7%d9%87-%d8%a8%d8%a7%d9%84%d8%b1%d9%8a%d8%a7%d8%b6/
Dawid2849 (2021-04-15 19:56:27+00:00): Cześć. Proszę nie rób takich zmian. To jest wandalizm. Kolejne wandalizmy mogą skutkować zablokowaniem twojego konta.
Filip009 (2022-04-11 17:42:30+00:00): Dobrý deň, dá sa to doplniť do tagu (značky) operator=Orange
*Martin* (2022-04-12 07:29:55+00:00): Tu sa este hodi tower:type=communication
*Martin* (2022-04-12 07:30:02+00:00): Tu sa este hodi tower:type=communication
eggie (2021-04-15 18:01:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback:  De addresnodes kun je ook verwijderen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Brian07 (2021-04-15 18:30:56+00:00): Ik durf hier zo niet te zeggen of het nummer 5 of 7 is? of misschien valt het onder beide nummers. Het is vanuit de weg het eerste gebouw.
eggie (2021-04-15 18:40:41+00:00): Het door jou gesloopt gebouw is 5 en 7 volgens de bgt
Dus je kunt beide nummers verwijderen
eggie (2021-04-15 18:04:48+00:00): Je zet het huisnummer buiten het gebouw?  Waarom?
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103009905
Een gebouw krijg nooit een huisnummer. Er is immers al een adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Brian07 (2021-04-15 18:15:15+00:00): Jep sorry, verkeerde gezien
eggie (2021-04-15 18:16:26+00:00): Adres Rijksweg 3 hersteld. Die schade ontstaat door schuiven met de kaart in edit modus.. Beter niet schuiven.
eggie
Brian07 (2021-04-15 18:18:14+00:00): excuus, zal er op letten
eggie (2021-04-15 18:05:26+00:00): Oke correct...
user_5359 (2021-04-16 04:29:54+00:00): Hello! You added a number of unknown tags in this change set. 
Shape_Area	5.3224995123E-5
Shape_Leng	0.0311531087959
dissolve	1
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning(!) of the keys.
See https://www.osm.org/way/931123631
Vedrfolnir (2021-04-16 05:51:07+00:00): Ah. Looks like I forgot to delete some tags created from the shapefile conversion process. I've fixed the error. Thanks for catching that.
DD1GJ (2021-04-16 09:03:34+00:00): Löschung zurückgesetzt. Der Weg war als disused:path eingetragen und somit in Karten unsichtbar. Diese Methode des Lebenszyklus werhindert u.a. , dass der Weg anhand veralteter Unterlagen erneut eingetragen wird. Dies ist mit zahlreichen Schutzgebietsverwaltungen abgesprochen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
itchybellybutton (2021-04-15 17:50:19+00:00): removed access destination
colgza (2021-04-17 15:53:58+00:00): I accidentally fucked everything up with this changeset.
eggie (2021-04-15 18:08:27+00:00): Dag Brian.. 

en waarom dan motor_vehicle=no veranderen in motor_vehicle in Yes
Ik draai deze changeset . Ik ben al vele malen aan het repareren geweest hier. 
Het was goed gemapt hier. 
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103010619

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-15 18:10:50+00:00): reverted by changeset #103011235

Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie