piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pfiers (2022-04-19 11:03:35+00:00): There isn't, fair point (https://i.imgur.com/px4OUmm.png).

I did change single_tracked to a combination of mofa, moped, motorcycle, and bicycle (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119900919).
Although I'm not sure that this is correct either. Are tricycles a type of bicycle?

Ideally there should be a tag for any non-motorized vehicles but excluding carriages, hand_carts, cycle_rickshaw etc.
mueschel (2022-04-19 11:19:53+00:00): Such a "tag for any non-motorized vehicles" is difficult to define (e.g. pedelecs (key: electric_bicycle) are usually counted as bicycles) - and definitions differ from region to region.


Btw, you can't use this on a two-way road:
bicycle:lanes = yes|yes|designated
It needs to be separated for each direction:
bicycle:lanes:backward = |designated
(N.B. you can even remove the 'yes', because it's the default for this kind of road)

Tricycles are bicycles with one double wheel axle, to allow for a wider cargo bay or to help balancing-impaired people to bike. Maybe an uncommon example...
pfiers (2022-04-19 11:35:26+00:00): Ah yes interesting stuff, thanks. Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119902696
SomeoneElse (2022-03-31 12:44:32+00:00): Your only change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034067200/history was to add an "area=yes" tag.  Why did you do this, and how does it relate to the changeset comment of "fixed incorrect tag "?
del_account (2022-04-04 07:13:29+00:00): The error "lines must close to a polygon" was showing, I just clicked "connect ends". I'm sorry, I didn't know that we should ignore errors.
julcnx (2022-04-01 13:01:44+00:00): thanks for your contributions. what source did you use for the updated ref number? how did you decide to change the highway classification from primary to secondary ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119157881
BeckNoDa (2022-04-01 14:54:08+00:00): Hello

what source did you use for the updated ref number?
- The source I used is from department of highways’ website.
https://roadnet2.doh.go.th/

how did you decide to change the highway classification from primary to secondary ?
- The highway that I changed to is a four digit highway (Highway 1352), thus, I changed the classification to secondary according to this guideline. >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Highway_classification
julcnx (2022-04-01 14:59:22+00:00): Great. thank you for your quality contributions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119157881
Dodko (2022-04-24 08:32:05+00:00): Telefónne čísla treba pridávať v medzinárodnom tvare +421 xxx xxx xxx aby sa dovolali aj cudzinci a zo zahraničia.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:phone
Tomas_J (2023-07-11 08:23:38+00:00): Ahoj, pre osobu, ktoru socha/doska zobrazuje alepo popisuje pouzivaj sekundarne odkazy - viz.:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:wikipedia
SomeoneElse (2022-03-31 12:40:18+00:00): Please don't just use changeset comments like "fixed incorrect tag".  As noted at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12511042 , many of the changes you are making are NOT tag corrections.
In this example, how do you know what https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1029412550/history is?  Have you visited the place?
del_account (2022-04-04 07:09:54+00:00): no, it wasn't. sorry, won't use this comment again.
eggie (2022-03-31 12:52:42+00:00): Ziet er netjes uit.  Letop Niet elk voetpad hoort de tag footway=sidewalk te krijgen. Kijk je nog even?
Gr eggie
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 15:45:37+00:00): 1. Please don't add non-existent features.
2. This is already canceled.
user_5359 (2022-03-31 17:48:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice all other node has a minus between the first and last two numbers. I will also reduce your advertising.
eggie (2022-03-31 12:56:09+00:00): Tip   
Ben nu toch aan het screenen. 
In woonwijken kun je beter highway=residential gebruiken
gr eggie
marczoutendijk (2022-04-01 10:46:53+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments!
Read this again:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5769
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-31 19:08:18+00:00): Should not have the building tag
eggie (2022-03-31 13:18:33+00:00): Mooi .. actuele verbinding.. Wanneer het een trap betreft dan highway=steps taggen
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-31 13:22:38+00:00): Steps toegevoegd..

Wellicht heb je een reden om niet te reageren of heb je nooit je mail gecheckt?

MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk (2022-04-01 10:46:37+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments!
Read this again:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5769
user_2066394 (2022-04-01 19:33:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dterrace
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 16:08:31+00:00): `=pitch` + `=table_tennis` means a table tennis table.
dfrcl (2022-05-27 02:52:05+00:00): This building does not exist, I deleted it in changeset #121551664.
eggie (2022-03-31 13:54:17+00:00): Maar beste... Ook al loopt een pad dood hoeft het niet van de kaart.
eggie
eggie (2022-03-31 13:54:44+00:00): layer=-1 klopt dan weer niet.
joost schouppe (2022-04-01 09:18:54+00:00): Hi Bankskes app,
It looks like you might be working on a new editor app? Please talk to the community about your plans - we might be able to give useful advice, and it can avoid you running into trouble later. Join our chatroom at https://app.element.io/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org , the forum at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=29 or the mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Jaihabehygreck (2022-03-31 21:44:02+00:00): bien
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
4004 (2022-04-02 22:00:06+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
обычно мы не пишем слова в названиях полностью в верхнем регистре, но если вам принципиально, то ок
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-05-03 18:32:13+00:00): السلام عليكم
لاحظت أن المكانيين قد قمت أنت وآخرين بوضع أسماء مختلفة لها، هل يوجد مشكلة بالتسميات أو الأماكن ؟ أيضاً هل يوجد لنفس المكان أكثر من اسم مثل أن يكون له اسم قديم أو اسم مشهور وغير مشهور ؟
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-05-03 18:44:53+00:00): فهذه النقطة:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9003067434/history
كان اسمها:
الدعثه، ثم سميت:
الدبدبة، ثم سميت:
سهلة الجوف، ثم سميت:
هضبة الجوف، ثم سميت:
الرهوه، ثم سميت:
البرقاء
ست أسماء مختلفة ومتعددة
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-05-03 18:47:56+00:00): والأخرى:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8987053993/history
كان اسمها:
سهلة العثعث، ثم سميت:
صطحه، ثم سميت:
الدبدبة، ثم سميت:
سهلة الجوف، ثم سميت:
هضبة الجوف، ثم سميت:
رهوة الجوف
eggie (2022-03-31 14:45:05+00:00): Beste UoW   Dat is gewoon  niet correct. Wel kun je een paaltje toevoegen.
eggie
eggie (2022-03-31 14:47:06+00:00): Het voetpad heb ik verwijderd.
UniterOfWorlds (2022-03-31 19:18:03+00:00): Bij de Vuurdoornstraat was een gelijkwaardige situatie, dan vermoed ik dat daar een voetpad aanmaken ook incorrect was
eggie (2022-03-31 19:24:58+00:00): Oke.. up to you
. Een bollard houdt per default een motorvoertuig tegen... Vandaar dat we moped en mofa= yes bijtaggen. 
Die zier osm ook als motorvoertuigen. Als er een motorfiets doorheen mag kun je ook motorcycle=yes taggen.

Up to you..
Genoeg te doen daar.
Groet
Eggie
NieWnen (2022-04-01 19:20:16+00:00): Hej, to nie jest zbyt poprawne. 

Usuwałem wszystkie niepoprawne jakiś czas temu (były o tym dyskusje na forum + użytkownik kubahaha, poprawiał polskojęzyczne wiki). Tag highway=bus_stop, dajemy w miejscu oczekiwania pasażerów w przypadku, gdy peron nie jest obszarem. Wpp nie dajemy.
W miejscu zatrzymania nie dajemy w ogóle.

2 linki do wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position
adamsc (2022-04-02 17:13:07+00:00): Hej, masz rację.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-31 15:53:02+00:00): Please correct the name, not delete the whole thing directly. They still represent something.
t_ja (2022-03-31 16:40:33+00:00): Ahoj,
aký je zdroj týchto zmien? Lebo KST smerovník s týmto názvom sa nachádza juhozápadne (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/243472950), a jeho nadmorská výška súhlasí s KST evidenciou. Iný smerovník až po "Sedlo pod Zlieňom" neevidujú. Máš aspoň fotografiu toho rázcestníka z poslednej doby? (vo Freemap galérii ho nemáme)
Patr1k_P (2022-03-31 16:59:43+00:00): ahoj fotka je tu https://sk.mapy.cz/fotografie?x=18.9099893&y=49.2573591&z=19&sourcep=foto&idp=1940821 ale aj som sa divil ze nesedi vyska, okolie som pozeral ale az tak daleko nie...potom ta fotka patri k nespravnemu smerovniku..Ok vratim to naspat
marczoutendijk (2022-04-02 11:54:14+00:00): "wgcf" are four keys on your keyboard.
What do you mean by that?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-31 21:49:04+00:00): All area changesets from past few days have been reverted due to tagging issues. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Duniversity
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforest
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
eggie (2022-03-31 14:42:26+00:00): Wanneer dat zo is voeg dan toe access=private
datendelphin (2022-04-01 20:31:02+00:00): Das https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509052702 ist kein highway=footway. Wenn es da ein Fahrverbot hat, dann bitte das Fahrverbot mappen, ohne die Strassenklasse zu ändern. Das OSM Datenmodell behandelt diese Eigenschaften unabhängig.
ultimo chilometro (2022-03-31 16:34:41+00:00): Il sentiero dismesso è individuato dalle coordinate 45°24'27''N, 11°28'5''E ad ovest e 45°24'26''N, 11°28'11'' ad est.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-15 17:28:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046871528/history has roof = hipped that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=hipped was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof
okwithmydecay (2025-05-31 16:29:08+00:00): Thanks for the heads-up, I have corrected https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/167019942
SomeoneElse (2022-04-01 13:10:46+00:00): Hello,
This edit looks just plain wrong.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034355697/history doesn't look like a residential road on either Bing or Maxar imagery, which you claim to have used here.
The original changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117750726 (not by you) also looks completely at variance with the available imagery as well.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
del_account (2022-04-04 07:15:04+00:00): sorry if my edits were wrong
lololailo (2022-04-02 07:33:21+00:00): Hola, veo que has corregido un posible error pero ahora has dejado tres caminos sin conectar. No creo que sea muy correcto arreglar un error para dejar otro.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119164183
del_account (2022-04-04 07:16:45+00:00): do you think it was worth leaving the wrong tag? sorry if my edit was wrong
eggie (2022-03-31 15:28:43+00:00): Top!   Alleen het laatste stukje heb ik dan nu ook in fietspad veranderd.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-31 15:08:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Het geboed van je edits is eigenlijk veel te groot. wat bedoel je met collectegebied?
Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus levert vaak schade op. Hier dus ook. 
Je krijgt dan onopzettelijke verplaatsinegn van objecten met alles wat daar aan vast zit.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-03-31 15:15:06+00:00): reveted by changeset #119165612

Voor de zekerheid heb ik je edits teruggedraaid en daarmee de schade hersteld.
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-31 15:21:26+00:00): Tip.. Houd het gebied van je edits zo groot als één straat.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-31 16:20:53+00:00): PB contact
eggie (2022-03-31 16:53:35+00:00): René.. Het is helaas niet de bedoeling om wijken waar gecollecteerd wordt aan te geven in OSM. Dat kan bv wel in een eigen layer. 
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/ voor eigen layer in OSM 

 MVG
eggie
gscholz (2022-05-01 06:19:23+00:00): Hi Kraan46,
your recent edits have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=47.29970&lat=-20.28631&zoom=11

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119164552

As far as I understand the  affected buildings originally had a circular shape.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Kraan46 (2022-05-01 06:33:42+00:00): Thanks for the comment. Sorry, without the corresponding task number of the project  i am not able to check or adjust your comment.
gscholz (2022-05-01 06:47:05+00:00): Hi Kraan46, 
thanks for your quick response. It is not necessary to check or even adjust my comment. Just fix the error your edit has created in the OSM database.
Guido
Kraan46 (2022-05-01 06:52:41+00:00): I am ready to to this but how can i find back what you mean if i am not able to locate it?
Kraan46 (2022-05-01 06:55:24+00:00): This why i asked you the corresponding task number. It is not my intention to adjust your comment (sorry for the wrong wording) but to adjust what you mentioned in your comment. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Kraan46 (2022-05-01 08:02:27+00:00): Fixed.
abakus_uploader (2022-03-31 22:31:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Martin_99 (2022-04-01 07:00:46+00:00): Hallo, den im Changeset enthaltenen landwirtschaftlichen Weg habe ich aufgrund einer technischen Reklamation selbstständig wieder gelöscht. Leider weiß ich nicht, wie man den offensichtlich von mir unbemerkt verschobenen Hydranten wieder auf die alte Position setzt. Kann hier jemand helfen? Sorry für die Umstände, es waren die ersten OSM-Schritte...
DD1GJ (2022-04-01 07:37:29+00:00): Hallo Martin,

kein Problem. Ich habe die Verschiebung rückgängig gemacht. JOSM hätte Dich gewarnt.

https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AWikiStart

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Ich wünsche Dir weiterhin viel Spaß mit OSM, Joachim
ToniE (2022-03-31 15:09:54+00:00): Hi,

eigentlich waren die nicht doppelt

1. amenity=parking_entrance an der Einfahrt

2. amenity=parking im Gebäude

Beide haben ihre Berechtigung ... nicht unbedingt bei privaten Tiefgaragen, da hast du Recht.

Gruß,
Toni
user_12500175 (2022-04-01 07:42:13+00:00): Hallo, die Tg-nodes hatte ich gesetzt nachdem ich die Vorgehensweise im Forum gelesen hatte. Allerdings nach  Überlegung und Diskussion wieder entfernt da sie in dem Fall keinen Mehrwert bringen. 
- Position nur geschätzt, Plätze kann man auch nur schätzen und die Berechtigung wird ja durch den Eingangsnode definiert.
JLZIMMERMANN (2023-02-08 15:08:22+00:00): bonjour,
pourquoi avoir transformé l'église au travers de relation ?
osmviborg (2022-03-31 15:28:22+00:00): Giver ingen mening: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=locality
Troels Arvin (2022-03-31 15:46:53+00:00): OK, how would you tag it, then, osmviborg? I could not find a better way.
osmviborg (2022-03-31 16:03:32+00:00): Jeg ville ikke tagge det. Der findes tusindvis af lokale betegnelser, landet rundt, har ingen relevans i OSM, efter min mening. Krydset blev engang kaldet engang 'dødskrydset', skal det så også med?
Troels Arvin (2022-03-31 20:10:45+00:00): Jeg synes, at lokale betegnelser har stor betydning og er en fin ekstra kvalitet ved Openstreetmap, som man ikke finder i andre kort. Det er klart, at der skal være en vis barriere for, at det tagges. At det er nævnt i flere avisartikler giver efter min mening den nødvendige tyngde. 

Jeg vil sammenligne det med et andet uofficielt navn: "Chokoladekrydset" ved Ballerup har (med rette) eksisteret i OSM i mere end et årti.

"Dødskrydset" er der vist rigtig mange kryds landet over, som periodisk hedder, så det er ikke karakteristisk nok, vil jeg hævde.
osmviborg (2022-04-01 04:41:43+00:00): Der skal findes et andet tag end 'place=	locality', det er faktuel forkert.
osmviborg (2022-04-01 05:58:14+00:00): Ændret til:
description=Lokalt navn på vejkrydset.
loc_name=Ejendomsmæglerkrydset
Troels Arvin (2022-04-01 12:13:19+00:00): Men nu kan man slet ikke fremsøge det længere. Før seneste ændring, fandt man det fint, når man søgte på "ejendomsmæglerkrydset".
Troels Arvin (2022-04-01 12:15:28+00:00): Jeg har lige genlæst https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dlocality og jeg kan simpelthen ikke se, at jeg har anvendt tagget forkert.
osmviborg (2022-04-01 15:31:19+00:00): Et vejkryds kan ikke være https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
Troels Arvin (2022-04-02 16:28:35+00:00): osmviborg, der er absolut _intet_ i beskrivelsen af place=locality, der modsiger den måde, jeg havde tagget. Faktisk er place=locality's beskrivelse en meget fin beskrivelse af, det, som jeg gerne ville afspejle. Du har slettet min tag og i stedet tagget på en måde, hvor man ikke længere finde stedet, når man søger i OSMs søgefunktion. Din tagging udnævner en specifik fej-node som havende navnet, hvilket i sig selv er ret iffy. Suk. Kan vi i det mindste ikke enes om, at jeg tagger det på samme måde som Chokoladekrydset?
Troels Arvin (2022-04-02 16:29:37+00:00): (Der skulle have stået "vej-node" i stedet for "fej-node".)
osmviborg (2022-04-02 20:27:37+00:00): OSM's søgefunktion har ret begrænsede muligheder, med f.eks. Overpass er alt muligt. At du stadig mener at place=* kan bruges i denne sammenhæng, er mig en gåde. Metoden brugt i 'Chokoladekrydset' har jeg ingen problemer med.
zluuzki (2022-04-01 19:08:14+00:00): These buildings would be better tagged "demolished:building=yes" for now - otherwise, people like me will come along and see "missing" buildings on the aerial images and re-add them.
user_5359 (2022-04-01 05:44:29+00:00): Hello (again)! Please notice your typo of building:material. I add the missing I to the four buildings.
topolusitania (2022-04-01 23:31:27+00:00): Porque estás a apagar edições anteriores de outros mapeadores e a criar novas ? É para ficares com os "louros"? Só para te dar um exemplo: caminhos apagados na estação Sul e Sueste que no mínimo tinham sido editados por 3 mapeadores.
topolusitania (2022-04-01 23:36:07+00:00): Justifica o desenho da linha  1046885198
Versão #1...
topolusitania (2022-04-01 23:39:25+00:00): Em vez de perderes tempo a apagar o trabalho dos outros, e nesta zona jánão é a primeira vez, devias preocupar-te em resolver o problema das estações de metro subterraneas que estão visiveis à superficie.
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-04-03 00:52:06+00:00): Não apaguei nenhuma edição anterior, apenas foi apagada uma linha possivelmente sem necessidade, (as outras duas foram substituídas por shapes, o desenho da linha 1046885198 segue a anterior 705743820, se achares pertinente poderei reverter a edição para recuperar essa linha. cumprimentos
topolusitania (2022-04-03 01:55:26+00:00): Não tenho por hábito reverter edições alheias.  Não tenho por hábito mapear como reais objectos que estejam ainda no papel. 
Tenho por hábito respeitar as edições de outros mapeadores e aproveitá-las, sem as  apagar.
Tenho por hábito simplificar ao máximo as minhas edições , sem criar "ruido" desnecessário, para que recém chegados possam editar facilmente. ( e aqui incluio "shapes, relações desnecessárias, etc etc.)
Preocupa-te a investigar como se devem mapear as estações de metro, pois há normas para isso que claramente tu não respeitaste.
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-04-03 03:08:43+00:00): Se há alguma edição de que discordes estarás no teu direito de comentar e dar a tua opinião no changeset próprio, sobre a situação deste changeset em concreto queres que recupere a linha que eliminei de forma a manter o histórico (705743820)? Cumprimentos
topolusitania (2022-04-03 10:19:49+00:00): A questão não é esta linha em concreto ( que por sinal tinha sido editada no minimo por 4 mapeadores, e numa dessas edições tinha sido marcada como túnel, no seguimento do percurso interno na estação) A questão é muito mais profunda: a sistemático falta de respeito da tua parte pelo trabalho dos outros. Essa é uma atitude que roça o vandalismo, quando em nome de uma suposta "pureza" no desenho desprezas o trabalho dos outros e os apagas. 
Talvez estejas esquecido, mas esta atitude tua  não é a primeira que acontece nesta zona. 
Para te refrescar a memória:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105286650#map=19/38.70722/-9.13692&layers=D

Volto a dizer: Preocupa-te é em  investigar como se devem mapear as estações de metro. Há normas  que claramente tu não respeitaste.
XD346 (2022-04-18 15:20:12+00:00): 深圳地铁前海车辆段 is a subway depot building above ground, please do not remove the building label. :)
mirikaaa (2022-04-27 15:12:01+00:00): Hi, XD346! Thank you for writing about this issue and also for fixing this case. In the future, we will be more attentive to such edits and expand our knowledge of mapping. Best Regards,Mapbox.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119167061
Misha Boiarkin (2022-04-27 20:21:42+00:00): Good afternoon XD346 and mirikaaa! 
Thanks for your comments about my changeset: 119167061, but I only removed the tag "building" from this area, because with the tag "building" this area would overlap roads and other objects within this area, and judging by the satellite images, there are some.  Also, this area is suspiciously large to be a building. Correct me if I'm wrong, and in the future I'll be more careful with such edits and expand my knowledge of mapping).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119167061
XD346 (2022-04-30 16:08:40+00:00): Hi Misha, its form is really misleading so don't worry about that. Maybe I can add some notes to it.
toeklk (2022-05-13 21:49:29+00:00): Hi Thierry,
I passed here yesterday and could see some initial signs of works, but the path is still fully accessible, right?  it even looks as if the cycle highway will be adjacent to the current path?
Thierry1030 (2022-05-13 23:33:17+00:00): Hello toeklk,
I only used government info for this. I don't know how they will put it into practice on the field.
Can you make perhaps some pictures and them via the app StreetComplete? or even better add pictures via the app of mapillary
toeklk (2022-05-17 20:30:30+00:00): Had a closer look, and you mapped it correct (ie. the fietssnelweg is indeed a new way next to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060546840 and (a part of) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23443349 .  See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23443349/history (so it seems like Polyglot might have added some pics in the meanwhile)