piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
highflyer74 (2018-12-14 06:12:24+00:00): Good morning! In case you only speak English, please let me know.
------------------------------------
Guten Morgen!

Ich möchte Dich nicht nerven, aber mich würde interessieren (und zwar wirklich), was Du als Basis für das Umtaggen in diesem Fall nimmst. Ich kann im Wiki dazu nichts finden. So wie es vorher war, schien es völlig richtig (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dclothes).

Da Du mir leider auf noch keinen Kommentar geantwortet hast, möchte ich Dich bitten, Dich in diesem Fall einmal kurz im CS Kommentar zu melden, damit ich und auch andere Mapper verstehen, wie es zu diesem Tagging kommt.

Danke!
SverigeFan (2018-12-13 21:31:53+00:00): Sorry, source of ChangeSet is wrong, should be "DigitalGlobe Premium".
Danysan95 (2018-12-14 08:42:15+00:00): Hai erroneamente messo il nome della torre nel campo "type:construction". Ho corretto nel changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65465625
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65455176
MikeN (2018-12-13 23:53:22+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  The address information normally has the house number listed separately from the street.   I separated the address parts and placed them on a new node away from the edge of the property.
damndog (2019-01-26 17:13:42+00:00): Proszę o większą uwagę w trakcie edycji. Wprowadzanie danych w tak niechlujny sposób to nic innego jak okazywanie lekceważenia pozostałym mapowiczom. Narysowałeś granice łącząc punkty z istniejącymi elementami np. drogami. Poprawienie tego zajmie całe wieki.
smaprs (2018-12-13 22:04:26+00:00): A ilha anteriormente era:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/32984/history  
Desculpa Blade
viloan (2018-12-13 22:05:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
PT-53 (2018-12-18 07:35:17+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
Du hast - wohl versehentlich - dieses Straßenstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/654820117 neu eingezeichnet, daß jetzt über diesem Straßenstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454027474 liegt.
Hinweis im OSMI: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.97524&lat=48.39032&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Fragende Grüße
abrensch (2019-03-24 10:29:41+00:00): Hallo raineru,

ist das hier noch aktuell mt der Einbahn-Strasse Haßlersrrasse nähe Ulm/Römerplatz ?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
rainerU (2019-03-24 10:53:08+00:00): Hallo Arndt,

ich bin z.Zt. nicht in Ulm und kann es daher nicht überprüfen. Aus Mitteilungen der örtlichen Verkehrsbetriebe SWU kann man entnehmen, dass sich zumindest die Verkehrsführung am Römerplatz geändert hat. Ich mache mal eine Note auf.

Grüße
Rainer
PT-53 (2019-07-08 06:59:58+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
ist das mit der Einbahnstraße an diesem Straßenabschnitt noch aktuell und müßte dann dieses Straßenstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386257052/history nicht auch schon eine Einbahnstraße sein?
Fragende Grüße
rainerU (2019-07-08 07:09:21+00:00): Ich war zuletzt am 22.Mai vor Ort und da war die Haßlerstraße noch Einbahn. Wenn man der SWU glauben darf, dann wurde die Einbahnregelung kurz danach aufgehoben:
https://www.linie2-ulm.de/detail/?tx_news_pi1%5Bnews%5D=297&cHash=349e427e60479f9d7a49fd0ba572523f
woodpeck_repair (2018-12-13 23:19:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65457476 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
SPalferro (2018-12-14 02:24:16+00:00): Hola, podría saber en que te basaste para hacer el cambio, ya que no concuerda con los lineamientos de la comunidad OSM Argentina (Clasificación rural actual: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina/V%C3%ADas_de_circulaci%C3%B3n#Rural)
Saludos
guillemmal (2018-12-14 02:27:16+00:00): Hola SPalferro, me basé en que no es una ruta segura multitrocha, por eso no debe ser categorizada como trunk. En el grupo de Telegram de la comunidad discutimos el tema. Te invito a participar.
Saludos
SPalferro (2018-12-14 02:51:02+00:00): Hola guillemmal, según la pagina que te enlace anteriormente, el acceso principal a localidades de mas de 45.000 hab. va como trunk (sin importar los carriles), la RN38 es el principal acceso al Gran Catamarca (200.100 hab.)
Respecto al grupo de Telegram, ya leí lo que discutieron, pero no esta relacionado con el cambio que esta en discusión.
Si te interesa hablar por Telegram, buscame con el mismo user que aquí (SPalferro).
Saludos
muralito (2018-12-15 02:24:31+00:00): ¿Entonces el motivo para dejarla como trunk viene a ser que es la principal union entre capitales de provincia?
AgusQui (2018-12-16 05:01:09+00:00): Si, es el camino directo entre ciudades de mas de 150000 habitantes, y tiene un nivel de tráfico alto
pertile (2018-12-16 16:21:40+00:00): El TDMA es por encima de 3 mil entre SF Catamarca y Chumbicha. Por lo que vi hay rutas seguras a partir de esa cifra e incluso un poco menos. Desde Chumbicha a La Rioja debajo de 2300 e incluso 1070 en un tramo. De La Rioja al sur es trunk porque vincula a La Rioja con Buenos Aires.
Podría ser trunk hasta Chumbicha y dejar como primary el resto, pero dejar solo ese tramo siendo que vincula dos ciudades de 200 mil habitantes, y que es la ruta obvia para vincular NOA y parte del NEA con Cuyo, me parece mucho.
muralito (2018-12-16 16:36:20+00:00): Disculpen que use los comentarios de este cambio en particular, pero creo que hay un problema mas grande a resolver.

Algo esta fallando, o el consenso, o la  convención no es clara, o la comunicación entre colaboradores.

La ruta (que estaba etiquetada trunk) entre La Rioja y San Luis tambien la pasaron a primary (que podria estar bien quizas), lo cual ademasse suma a que provinciales de ese entorno las pasaron de secondary a primary, entonces ya queda todo igual, nada se distingue del resto (lo cual tambien podria estar bien si ese fuera el caso en la realidad, pero creo que no). Como lo he planteado en varias ocasiones, a mi mas que la clasificacion puntual de los tramos me preocupa mantener la coherencia de la clasificación, que la jerarquia de las vias en la realidad sea lo que se refleja en OSM.

Creo que se precisa mejorar urgente como gestionamos todo esto, porque con editar y corregir unos para un lado y otros para otro no llegamos a ningún lado.
emvee (2019-12-14 16:00:16+00:00): Hi Fizzie,

In this changeset you added bicycle=no to some ways that have cycleway:left = lane and that does not really make sense.

You seem to be known in Sidney so can you have a look at these problems reported by Osmose and try to fix them?

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#source=16390&item=3032&class=30329&zoom=18&lat=-28.086057&lon=153.426349&level=2&tags=&fixable=

Thanks,

Martin.
emvee (2019-12-14 16:08:16+00:00): More problems in the same area ;-)

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#source=16390&item=3032&class=30329&zoom=15&lat=-28.09387&lon=153.43447&level=2&tags=&fixable=
Fizzie-DWG (2019-12-16 06:37:39+00:00): Hi Martin.

You're right - it doesn't make sense?

& what's got me even more confused is that I have absolutely no memory of making these changes, & I don't map bike ways!

I can tell you that there is a marked bike lane going west along Christine Ave, & another south along Bermuda St. There isn't one, though, in the first part of the Christine to Bermuda link / slip lane, but there is a bike crossing part way along that lane, & the bike lane resumes from that point onwards. I don't know how anybody riding a bike is supposed to negotiate that turn?

I'm guessing that just returning the whole thing to bike=yes should fix it?

Thanks

Graeme
emvee (2019-12-16 20:29:09+00:00): Hi Graeme,

Thanks for coming back on this, yes, I think it would be good to remove bicycle=no. Changing it into bicycle=yes is not really necessary as the default access restrictions for Australia, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Australia indicate that for these roads bicycles are by default allowed.

Cheers,

Martin.
mavl (2018-12-14 16:19:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. Извините, но ваши дома почти все непрямоугольные. Чтобы сделать здание прямоугольным в редакторе JOSM, нужно выделить здание и нажать на Q.  
  
Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника вы берете адреса.
mavl (2018-12-14 16:16:04+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за участие в проекте OpenStreetMap.  
  
Вы существенно сдвинули некоторые объекты (например, улицу Кирова на почти 20 метров от её реального положения).  
Вы сдвигаете спутниковый снимок под GPS-треки перед редактированием? Этот процесс описан в статье  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2
Warin61 (2019-03-15 04:41:39+00:00): Hi,

This has only confused the issue!

When you removed the highway=proposed .. you need also to remove the proposed=* key.
viloan (2018-12-14 00:45:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-08-03 21:20:24+00:00): So why you reclassified the road?
This is a L class road, that means that this is a L-"Local road", and not a R-"Republican road" (with primary type). This road must be or tertiary, or secondary.
feta2 (2019-08-05 19:28:39+00:00): Hello Moldovan_Merkator,

Based on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Moldova/Drumuri only M-routes or express roads should be Trunk. Is there a local policy documented somewhere which indicates L-routes should classified as tertiary or secondary only?

Thanks!
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-08-07 22:19:42+00:00): No, for Moldova doesn't exist a policy what road should be tertiary or what to be secondary, but the Moldova OSM community tag road in this mode:
A-roads (Autostradă) - =motorway
M-roads (Drum Magistral) - =trunk
E-roads (Drum European) - =trunk
R-roads (Drum Republican) - =primary
G-roads (Drum Raional) - =secondary
L-roads (Drum Local) - =tertiary
feta2 (2019-08-08 22:32:42+00:00): Hi Moldovan_Merkator,

Thanks for the information. Have these classification guidelines been discussed with the Moldova community? I have been classifying roads based on road importance because no documented policy was available. Here is the global OMS policy I was following:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway.
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-08-08 23:43:43+00:00): Of course, if you want to discuss about mapping in Moldova, here is our Telegram group: https://t.me/OSMMoldova
feta2 (2019-08-12 15:18:42+00:00): Hello Moldovan_Merkator,

I looked through the Telegram group and found discussions on classifications based on ref tags. I think it would be helpful to solidify a policy and add it to the Moldova OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Moldova or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Moldova/Drumuri. This will prevent future confusion for new mappers in Moldova that might use the global OSM policy or one of their own. What do you think about adding policy to the wiki?

Thanks!
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-08-12 22:38:27+00:00): That will be great, but you have some examples how will look this policy?
feta2 (2019-08-13 17:06:49+00:00): Hello Moldovan_Merkator,

Here are three examples of OSM wiki pages that detail various highway classifications based on what the ref tag is. 

Ukraine: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:highway#.D0.97.D0.BD.D0.B0.D1.87.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.BD.D1.8F
Denmark: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Map_Features#Veje_.28highway.29 
Russia: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification 

I think these are great examples and can be used to create a solid policy page for Moldova.

Thanks!
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-08-13 17:59:53+00:00): That will be very good, but I don't know how to create a special page for this policy, because in osm is not present moldovan language page to create a dedicated moldovan wiki page, or to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Moldova for this?
feta2 (2019-08-14 17:40:22+00:00): Hello,

I think using the existing Moldova roads wiki will work best: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Moldova/Drumuri. Here is an OSM wiki page that explains how to edit OSM wiki pages: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wiki_Help. The Moldova policy page can be written in any language and people can translate when they are on that page. What do you think?

Thanks!
Moldovan_Merkator (2019-08-14 20:34:51+00:00): Well, it's a good idee, I will prepare this page in a few days.
feta2 (2019-08-14 20:57:35+00:00): Thank you!
naoliv (2018-12-14 16:30:40+00:00): Maybe it's necessary to better verify paths like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/654844805
I think that there isn't a path there; even if there was, it should be connected to the near highways (otherwise it will be unusable by any routing software)
AlaskaDave (2018-12-14 08:55:42+00:00): bjazz,

I'm working in that area and have been replacing coastlines. I just had to quit a session because of too many conflicts to deal with, it appears that they were your edits.

Let me now when you're through so I can patch things up.
b-jazz (2018-12-14 18:37:40+00:00): Oh man. I'm really sorry about that. My change was trivial and can be reverted if that makes it easier for you to to resolve the conflicts.
I'll make sure I wait several days before editing any of your work in the area again.
AlaskaDave (2018-12-14 23:23:44+00:00): No problem. Sorry I took such a stern tone yesterday. I'm used to being the only mapper working in these remote areas. If the Conflict Dialog was more informative and straightforward to use it would make it so much easier to resolve them. I had to quit my session and then come back to clean up stray nodes later. 
Thanks for the quick reply, b-jazz. I'm slowly adding parts of the giant Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuge. One of the up sides is that its boundary often follows the coast  making it a good replacement for the ugly PGS coastlines imported years ago. The down side is that it's such a massive refuge.
berjk (2020-11-07 15:32:12+00:00): English:
elevation of 10 m is wrong. The town "Wemdig" reach a elevation of +/- 450 m.

German:
Eine Ortshöhe von 10 m kann nicht se
in! Das Gebiet der Gemeinde Wemdig liegt auf ca. +/- 450 m.
Andreas Binder (2018-12-14 13:57:24+00:00): Hi Toliman, das Gipfelkreuz wäre in OSM eigentlich als Attribut des Gipfels https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26863307 bereits vorhanden. Auch "name=Gipfelkreuz" ist nicht allzu sinnvoll. Grüße Andreas
geow (2018-12-14 22:06:51+00:00): Hi Toliman, as Andreas already mentioned, it is common practice to record the summit cross as a sub-tag of natural=peak, if the cross is - as here - erected at the highest point.
geow (2018-12-27 22:07:55+00:00): Versuch einer Lösung: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26863307
Passt das so?
Grüße
Klaus
Andreas Binder (2018-12-28 08:44:10+00:00): So fände ich es sehr gut. Ich hätte auch nichts gegen einen separaten Knoten mit "man_made=cross"&"Name=Chiemgaukreuz" gehabt, aber "name=Gipfelkreuz" fand ich eben sinnfrei.
geow (2018-12-28 21:23:17+00:00): Danke Andreas, bei christlichen Symbolen wie einem Gipfelkreuz finde ich den main tag man_made nicht ganz so ideal :-)
mds878 (2018-12-23 13:26:09+00:00): opening_hoursの記入は、日本語での記入はできず、ルールに合うように記入する必要があります。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:opening_hours

この近辺で、私が気づいた箇所はすべて直しておきました。
ルールはかなり複雑なので、ルールに従って入力するのが難しい場合は、noteに日本語で書いておくと良いと思います。
Supaplex (2019-02-06 14:57:19+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
viloan (2018-12-14 03:04:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-07-21 13:08:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
ash_win (2020-02-17 05:32:28+00:00): "Hi  Deo IRM-ED,

Trust you are well. While working on Bandung, I have come across ways
"way 654861071
way 654857748" classified as 'Residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be hanging segments.So,Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance."
ash_win (2020-02-17 05:36:40+00:00): "Hi Deo IRM-ED,
Sorry for the inconvenience the city which was mentioned was wrong, it is Surabaya not Bandung
"Trust you are well. While working on Surabaya, I have come across ways 
"way 654861071 
way 654857748" classified as 'Residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be hanging segments.So,Please look into this and share your observations"

Thanks in advance."
Adiatma IRM-RV (2020-02-17 07:28:26+00:00): Hi ash_win.

This is outside Surabaya but no worries about it, you pointed the problem well.
You are correct, those seems to be hanging segments. Usually we prefer to leave it as is, since it has clear visibility based on imageris i.e Bing, rather than to delete/make a force connection.

Happy mapping!
naoliv (2018-12-14 16:27:13+00:00): Hi, MTG5093
Paths like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/654858667 don't receive a street name here.
RunRunShow (2018-12-14 07:59:50+00:00): Hi bhavyakota,

I notice you have changed this road to trunk type. As trunk road is only secondary to motorway, for this road it's best to just tag it as residential. Trunk roads are usually reserved for federal route connecting major towns in Malaysia.
bhavyakota (2018-12-14 11:25:56+00:00): Hi RunRunShow,

Thanks for your time and valuable feedback.

As per you recommendation i have made necessary changes. However in order to maintain classification consistency throughout the stretch changed road classification as Tertiary till the road meets Highway 9.

Your valuable suggestions are always welcome & feel free to let me know if still any edits need to be done.

Thank you,
bhavyakota.
Baloo Uriza (2019-01-26 20:41:56+00:00): Why did you retag this as rcn?  That's for state bike routes, the Westside Regional Trail is a service of Metro, not the State of Oregon.  This is an lcn.
Carnildo (2018-12-14 08:44:02+00:00): Is this actually in use for commercial purposes?  I'm not seeing anything that looks like commercial buildings, or even commercial construction, in last week's Sentinel imagery.
mueschel (2018-12-16 17:53:30+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded several ways with the tag "key:note = ...". Some ways are missing any other tag. Could you have a look and fix these?

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Ezx

Cheers, Jan
d1sr4n (2019-06-12 04:28:37+00:00): Thank you! I will.
CloCkWeRX (2019-06-07 08:21:33+00:00): The bunnings here already seems mapped, but in a different location - which is right?
jakecopp (2019-06-25 07:10:11+00:00): Oops, thanks so much for letting me know. I must have missed it or OsmAnd hadn't updated with it.
I just removed the Bunnings I added in changeset 71587623.
BCNorwich (2018-12-14 08:10:42+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you have added the tag "name:ro=East Ham" to this bus stop. May I respectfully point out that East Ham is not the correct name for this stop neither in English or Romanian. East Ham is actually a long way from this place.

The English name for the stop is tagged as "Bank Station / Threadneedle Street" this translates to Romanian as "Banca / Strada Threadneedle".

For this reason I have removed the incorrect name tag, if you wish to add a correct Romanian name please do so. If I can help in any way please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
4004 (2018-12-20 21:43:31+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты.
я так подозреваю, что магазин у вас не на улице возле Гронитекса. осм хороша тем, что точки не привязаны к адресу, но нужно какое то позиционирование. я так понимаю, вы в здании возле Кристалла? судя по сьемке улиц, да https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1yNumVxVBVPx-3wyMoY5XQ&focus=photo&lat=53.70735834823335&lng=23.81632525476051&z=17&x=0.28613090809669717&y=0.4840147417717711&zoom=0.9946949602122016
а вот на вашем сайте яндекс вас в короне поставил
поправил положение точки и формат часов работы
4004 (2018-12-20 21:44:47+00:00): а, ну и вы не супермаркет насколько я вижу, поставил "строительный магазин"
mavl (2019-07-21 13:08:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:08:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:08:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.