piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
partyfan (2019-09-29 22:25:27+00:00): https://www.batmagazine.it/news/2018/09/12/barletta-consegna-lavori-per-eliminazione-semafori-incrocio-via-foggia-via-violante/
http://www.batmagazine.it/news/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/piantina-lavori.jpg
https://www.comune.barletta.bt.it/retecivica/lavpub/progetti/pvrotpis19/elab/Tav_1_Pianta_delle_demolizioni.pdf.p7m
partyfan (2019-09-29 22:27:48+00:00): https://www.comune.barletta.bt.it/retecivica/lavpub/progetti/pvrotpis19/index.htm
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-11 12:13:52+00:00): Olá,

as restrições de conversão criadas por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10094536

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10094537

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas (possuem uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essas restrições?
DressyPear4 (2019-09-30 04:56:41+00:00): A linha representa o rio e a área a represa, não precisa alterar as tags.
Essa edição foi revertida.
flohoff (2019-09-30 08:25:10+00:00): Moin,
die Ortsdurchfahrt Salzkotten aka Thüler Straße hast du zu einer Primary gemacht. Das ist abert nur eine Landstraße also L 751. Wie kommst du auf die Hochstufung? 

Flo
Galbinus (2019-09-30 15:47:49+00:00): Ganz einfach. Ich bin gestern durch Salzkotten gekommen rund habe festgestellt, dass der Verkehr der B1 in der einen Richtung über den Wallgraben geführt wird, in der anderen über die lange Straße in einer Einbahnstraße. Nach dem Prinzip des Mappings in erster Linie nach Verkehrsbedeutung muss demnach die Thüler Straße und die weiteren Straßen, über die der B1-Verkehr geführt wird, die gleiche Klassifizierung zugeordnet werden wir der offiziellen B1, über die der Verkehr aus Richtung Soest geführt wird.
flohoff (2019-09-30 15:50:01+00:00): Jo,
wir diskutieren das schon auf der osm-owl mailingliste. Das ganze routing ist aber extrem seltsam. 

Da werden so rein optisch viel bessere routen gemieden. So ganz schlau bin ich da noch nicht geworden.

Die änderungen gestern haben jedenfalls das routing noch schlechter gemacht. Also das durch Salzkotten durch.

Führt wirklich teilweise zu in meinen Augen absurden routen.

Wird aber auf der osm-owl mailingliste als "Tja - so isses" bestätigt ...

Flo
Galbinus (2019-09-30 15:52:55+00:00): Wieso soll das Routing verschlechtert werden? Das verstehe ich jetzt nicht.
flohoff (2019-09-30 15:57:14+00:00): Beispiele - Rot ist alt - Grün ist neu - Allen routen ist gemein das sie jetzt Salzkotten meiden.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=144372,160525#51.69852,8.59491,13z

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=144185,160382#51.70108,8.59594,13z

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=144414,160528#51.67554,8.64452,12z

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=144408,160527#51.64146,8.63045,13z

Sind noch ein paar mehr die gestern Geschwenkt sind - Hier am Ende die ganzen mails die ich bekommen habe das routen geschwenkt sind:

https://gt.owl.de/pipermail/osm-owl-routeqa/2019-September/thread.html

Flo
Galbinus (2019-09-30 16:53:39+00:00): Ist für mich durch die Klassifizierung nicht zu erklären, denn wieso sollte eine Hochstufung zur Meidung führen? Könnte es vielleicht ein andere Grund sein? An mehreren Stellen ist dort Tempo 30, Altenheim ausgeschildert, in OSM war durchgängig Tempo 50 eingetragen. Ich habe gestern, nachdem ich in beiden Richtungen durch Salzkotten durchgefahrfen bin, alle drei Tempo-30-Abschnitte in OSM eingetragen.
flohoff (2019-09-30 17:13:15+00:00): 
Ja - das wirds vermutlich sein. Wenn ich mir die routen insgesamt ansehe dann habe ich meine Zweifel ob irgendwer wirklich so fahren würde - Ohne mich da jetzt auszukennen. Aber so ist das wenn man die realität abbildet.

Und ich habe mir einige Strecken angesehen - die sind schon richtig attributiert - und auch sehr umfassend.

Flo
Warin61 (2019-09-30 05:22:34+00:00): Err no. 
Neither of the links you give show military use of the area. The parks link shows the area of relation 10094639 as the town common. 

The second link shows the Mt Louisa- area as defense land and that appears to be already tagged. This is south of the area you have tried to tag as defense. 


Relation 10094640, v1 is a duplication of relation Radar (10094639, v1)? The name 'Radar' appears to have no justification, possibly a description?
Luen Warneke (2019-09-30 05:45:55+00:00): Could you please revert this change then? 
I recall reading it somewhere but when searching for it couldn't find the source.
Warin61 (2019-09-30 22:37:24+00:00): Done.

Keep mapping, take care with any copyright issues too.
Luen Warneke (2019-10-01 02:06:52+00:00): Thank you. It's much appreciated.
dgitto (2019-10-02 08:12:52+00:00): Benvenuto. Ma come si chiama questa guest house?
naoliv (2019-09-30 12:23:48+00:00): Parece que você está criando áreas verdes que não existem de verdade no mapa.
O OpenStreetMap é um projeto sério, utilizado para vários fins, e não apenas para Pokemon.
Você poderia corrigir esses locais que você adicionou de forma incorreta, por favor?
viloan (2019-09-29 23:27:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
LogicalViolinist (2019-09-30 14:47:18+00:00): Mind not moving my bus stops that have been verified (mapillary) and moved to the exact location?

For example Node 6817903465 you moved it to the corner when it is not: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.4293349&lng=-75.6842723&z=17&pKey=hJ5HLovxGc4Cb2uhBRAQQg&focus=photo

The stops with stops on the way that I have created have been verified via mapillary, if you move them, it's just creating extra work for me
DannyMcD (2019-09-30 17:16:04+00:00): I will try to preserve positions (if they are accurate).  However, I may still edit bus stops, and I might move them if they are wrong.
LogicalViolinist (2019-09-30 17:21:21+00:00): If they are wrong, more power to ya! It's going to be a lot of work upgrading the bus routes to PTv2, so I'm glad I'm not alone
MKnight (2019-11-08 12:03:11+00:00): Moin, Ausfahrten (und Auffahrten) werden an der baulichen Trennung gesetzt.
Bitte verschiebe diese Nodes zukünftig nicht weiter an den Anfang der Ausfahrten.
power expert (2019-10-04 11:29:23+00:00): Please invest some effort in changeset comments.
power expert (2019-10-04 11:30:01+00:00): Or you'll probably keep receiving nasty comments like this one ;)
user_5359 (2019-09-30 04:34:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
okadatsuneo (2019-10-05 13:18:08+00:00): highway=primaryの設定を削除されているようですが、その変更はおかしいと思います。
yumean1119 (2019-10-08 03:55:50+00:00): 変更セット: 75398441 にて修正しました。

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75398441
CoyKoi (2019-09-30 10:05:34+00:00): Hi Callum,
Footpaths can be mapped as seperate ways, as you have done, but generally this is only done if there's quite a distinct footpath, separated by a fence or a grass verge or something like that.

And keep in mind that pedestrian routing becomes much more complicated if you start mapping footpaths separately!

Have a read of the OSM wiki on sidewalks: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75075358
Minh Nguyen (2020-03-16 06:23:50+00:00): There’s another “Charleston Drive” a couple blocks to the west, off of Ames Boulevard – is that Manor Heights Drive, if this is is Charleston Drive?
TravGW (2019-09-30 02:23:34+00:00): Please be careful when editing. You deleted a major highway. It has been fixed.
jfd553 (2026-04-21 11:19:33+00:00): You added bicycle=yes and horse=yes on a footway/track on Way: 366169466.  Did you go on the trail or get the info from another source ?
I am looking for a source (field survey or something else :-)
badenk (2026-04-21 13:33:06+00:00): Yes, I walked the trail solo to the pass.

Put "athabasca pass" into a search engine, and you will encounter very accurate and official information.

thanks,
Baden
jfd553 (2026-04-21 22:28:18+00:00): Nice hike ! The trail ends in the middle of the wood.  A few hundreds meters away there is a trail segment imported from Canvec. Do you think both trails are linked?  Is the imported segment still exist?
Thank again  👍
jfd553 (2026-04-21 22:30:01+00:00): I'll put athabasca trail in the search engine for more details 👍
badenk (2026-04-21 22:52:09+00:00): Over 200 years ago this was the predominant route over the Rocky Mountains. For last 100 years or more, the route has been abandoned, so what is left from fires, km of washouts, windfall and overgrown brush, is what you get.  The trail itself is sporadic.
user_5359 (2019-09-30 04:11:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please note that we only note real things and not game items like Pokemon Parks. Please be sure to do so.
Supaplex (2019-09-30 05:47:09+00:00): 已經有了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/479306771
而且你選擇的類別不對，不是旅遊的類別，應該是社會福利設施
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75076507
WoodWoseWulf (2019-09-30 05:12:25+00:00): Hi Gshep and welcome to OSM.

I've searched far and wide for any reference to this park existing and I just can't find anything on it... even the name you had originally "Barryville Wilderness Park" turns up nothing.

Are you able to point me in the direction of more information?
TravGW (2019-09-30 21:03:50+00:00): Por favor, não adicione tags extras desnecessárias. As tags fornecidas pelo editor on-line são boas o suficiente.

Please do not add unnecessary extra tags. The tags the online editor provides is good enough.
user_5359 (2019-09-30 04:06:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. Don't add any private information  (Martin's House) from residential or owner to a residential building!
mavl (2019-11-07 14:16:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mueschel (2019-10-01 08:42:36+00:00): Hi,
please check these two nodes - they both have several tags that are imported and shouldn't appear in the OSM database. Maybe you can change them to some common, documented tags?

Jan
user_5359 (2019-09-30 15:14:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. 
Please add a description (name=shop isn't the same like shop=convience). 
Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. 
A glade is not a tree row.
Glassman (2019-09-30 16:54:07+00:00): Along with user_5359, I improved some of your buildings, changed the dept of transp from a building to a landuse and removed the tree line. The tree line was removed because it should be a natural=woods for the entire wooded area that surrounds the property.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75077226
WoodWoseWulf (2019-09-30 04:15:14+00:00): Hi Matthew and welcome to OSM!

Typically we tag sports fields as pitches on OSM (leisure=pitch) rather than parks (leisure=park). If the sports field is in a larger park or recreation ground, you can add that separately as well :).

Let me know if you need any help, happy mapping :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-13 07:33:27+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3264959 ?
viloan (2019-09-30 04:22:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-11-07 14:16:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-11-07 14:16:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Minh Nguyen (2019-09-30 05:08:22+00:00): The source for these buildings is CAGIS 2019 orthophotography.
nyuriks (2019-12-25 23:18:46+00:00): Доброго времени.  А зачем вы поменяли "building=yes" на "building=Здание без конкретного типа" ?  Произвольный текст не поймёт ни один потребитель данных.
ForstEK (2019-12-26 08:14:06+00:00): Здравствуйте, Юрий Семенович! Почему Вы отмечаете здания тэгом "building=Здание без конкретного типа"? Это неправильно, в таком случае должен быть тэг "building=yes". Почитайте вики, пожалуйста, перед тем, как редактировать карту! https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-09-30 05:22:48+00:00): Clarification: comment should be rather like this: [Lipa, Batangas] reverted edit that removed roundabout and expansions of SM City Lipa (apparently armchair mapping using outdated Bing imagery)
Glassman (2019-09-30 17:01:41+00:00): I removed the discriptive names from buildings and farm land. We don't use descriptive names in OSM. If it's desirable to classify an object, there is usually a tag for it. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75078869
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:23:03+00:00): again delete
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 07:20:38+00:00): I just haven't deleted. I was correcting my intent and I made some incorrect changes to the packages below which I will correct myself. Don't touch this part. You have spoken offensive in posts. I'm sorry for your kind words
75079217, 75079289, 75079323, 75079369, 75079444, 75079504, 75079553, 75079619, 75079645, 75079702, 75079784, 75080003, 75080113, 75080348, 75080411
Sosha1996 (2019-09-30 10:58:59+00:00): بسته‌های تغییر 75079217, 75079289, 75079323, 75079369, 75079444, 75079504, 75079553, 75079619, 75079645, 75079702, 75079784, 75080003, 75080113, 75080348, 75080411 همگی ایراد دارن و باید بازگردانی بشن.
رسم اولیه صحیح بوده و متاسفانه شما رسم اولیه رو حذف کردید و به جاش رسم جدید کردید که صحیح نیست.
در رسم قبلی هر خونه ریلیشن داشت که باعث میشد خطوط روی هم نیوفتن و از یه خط برای دو رسم استفاده بشه که درواقع اون خط میشده مرز مشترک دو خونه.
لطفا تا پایان بازگردانی در این منطقه ویرایش نزنید تا تداخلی پیش نیاد.

ممنون از ویرایش‌هاتون و وقتی که روی نقشه میذارید.

سوشا مصلح
ChehrehBargi (2019-09-30 15:44:50+00:00): جناب سوشا با تشکر از توجهات شما
این مورد رو بنده بی اطلاع بودم که اشتباه هست. متاسفانه کاربر Ali Zangeneh با توهین و تحقیر کار بنده رو خرابکاری عمدی دانسته و اقدام به گزارش بنده کرده. اگر صلاح بدانید، خودم اصلاح کرده و برگردانم یا اینکه بفرمایید چه کار کنیم.
با سپاس
Sosha1996 (2019-09-30 15:49:12+00:00): البته ایشون رفتار بدی داشتن ولی قصد توهین و یا تحقیر نداشتن.
به هر حال...
الان موقع خوبیه که از JOSM استفاده کنید و اقدام کنید به رسم صحیح مواردی که به اشتباه رسمشون کردید.

با احترام،
سوشا مصلح
ChehrehBargi (2019-09-30 16:00:46+00:00): ارادتمند سوشا جان
پس بسم الله شروع می کنم
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:22:34+00:00): u broken data on map stop this shit
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 07:18:39+00:00): My goal has been positive and I have made some incorrect changes to the changsetes below which I will correct myself. Don't touch this part. You have also spoken offensive in changsetes . I'm sorry for this kind of literature
75079217, 75079289, 75079323, 75079369, 75079444, 75079504, 75079553, 75079619, 75079645, 75079702, 75079784, 75080003, 75080113, 75080348, 75080411
SilvinoG (2019-09-30 06:10:44+00:00): This is wrong sorry.
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:21:50+00:00): some delete again !
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 07:12:43+00:00): There was a problem that I was going to recover.
I have not just eliminated but my goal is to correct those areas that have only been mistaken in the following change packages; the rest of my work is all positive:
75079217, 75079289, 75079323, 75079369, 75079444, 75079504, 75079553, 75079619, 75079645, 75079702, 75079784, 75080003, 75080113, 75080348, 75080411
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:21:24+00:00): what do u think ?

u think u r so good for delete data  ?
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 07:11:32+00:00): I did not sabotage a problem that I will recover.
I have not just eliminated but my goal is to correct those areas that have only been mistaken in the following change packages; the rest of my work is all positive:
75079217, 75079289, 75079323, 75079369, 75079444, 75079504, 75079553, 75079619, 75079645, 75079702, 75079784, 75080003, 75080113, 75080348, 75080411
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:20:52+00:00): again and again !
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 07:07:59+00:00): I didn't sabotage. Something went wrong that I will restore.
You have insulted me in the packages below that show how low your thinking is.
75079217, 75079289, 75079323, 75079369, 75079444, 75079504, 75079553, 75079619, 75079645, 75079702, 75079784, 75080003, 75080113, 75080348, 75080411
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:20:32+00:00): again some delete data and i think much more in the way
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 07:03:01+00:00): My work was not intentional. You don't have to do anything. My changes are positive, not sabotage. I've made a mistake in the following change clauses that I'll fix them myself. You have offended me a lot in the same packages of change. Understand what you are saying, be thoughtful and respectful
75079217, 75079289, 75079323, 75079369, 75079444, 75079504, 75079553, 75079619, 75079645, 75079702, 75079784, 75080003, 75080113, 75080348, 75080411
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:19:58+00:00): wtf !
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 06:58:33+00:00): You think wrong. Your behavior is not to correct the plan, but you are hostile to me. All my changes in other areas have been positive. The only area where multiple buildings are stuck together is a mistake that occurred in the packages changed below these errors
75079217, 75079289, 75079323, 75079369, 75079444, 75079504, 75079553, 75079619, 75079645, 75079702, 75079784, 75080003, 75080113, 75080348, 75080411
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:19:41+00:00): i think u want broken all map in QOm !
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 06:54:14+00:00): You think wrong. Your behavior is not to correct the plan, but you are hostile to me. All my changes in other areas have been positive. The only area where multiple buildings are stuck together is a mistake that occurred in the packages changed below these errors
75079217, 75079289, 75079323, 75079369, 75079444, 75079504, 75079553, 75079619, 75079645, 75079702, 75079784, 75080003, 75080113, 75080348, 75080411
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:19:12+00:00): again delete data and fucking map
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 06:48:54+00:00): The changes I've made have been consistent. My work has not been eliminated. My intention was to correct the map. If something goes wrong I will fix it myself.
Sorry for your short-sightedness
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:18:47+00:00): stop delete relations....
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 06:46:40+00:00): Mr. Ali Zanganeh
The changes I've made have been consistent. You have alerted me on each of my change packs after two days. Your intention is to sabotage me while there is something wrong and I will make up for it myself.
Sorry for your short-sightedness
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:18:19+00:00): u broken data on map not 1 time
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 06:41:49+00:00): I will return the data to the first state
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:17:45+00:00): i most revert this shit 1 by 1

some admin check this !
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 06:40:25+00:00): You don't have to do anything
I'll correct it myself
Thanks to the managers and editors of Iran
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:17:09+00:00): again and again fucked map !

if u dont know dont fuck other
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 06:38:36+00:00): The changes I've made to this range have been consistent. Not to do a part and sabotage your message again.
I'm not an amateur; I have edited a range incorrectly and will fix it.
Unfortunately, you are stupid and do not understand what you are saying
user_5359 (2019-09-30 15:25:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:16:36+00:00): wtf stop this shit
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 06:34:13+00:00): I've made some changes to the map that were not intentionally wrong and I'll correct those errors myself
Unfortunately, you are stupid and do not understand what you are saying
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-11 23:18:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75588305 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some doodles and other fake data.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3206 .
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:15:42+00:00): what r u doing ?

why u fucked map ?
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 06:33:38+00:00): I've made some changes to the map that were not intentionally wrong and I'll correct those errors myself
Unfortunately, you are stupid and do not understand what you are saying
Ali Zangeneh (2019-10-01 05:14:46+00:00): why u delete all relation ???

if u dont know how to edit dont fuck map !
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-01 06:30:27+00:00): It was inadvertent, not my sabotage. I didn't know it right, and I'll correct it myself.
Unfortunately, your politeness is zero
bilboed (2019-10-01 09:54:04+00:00): Name is not valid (and restaurant does not seem to exist)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75080696
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-11 23:18:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75588305 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some doodles and other fake data.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3206 .
TravGW (2019-09-30 21:22:17+00:00): Was this a assignment for a school?
moreno96 (2019-10-11 10:36:16+00:00): سلام. شما باید برای چنجست هاتون، کامنت بذارید و به صورت مختصر کاری که کردید رو اعلام کنید.
شماره گذاشتن معنی نمیده