piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
datendelphin (2019-04-13 13:16:12+00:00): Ah, die Strassenklassifizierung richtet sich nach der Wichtigkeit, nicht nach der Grösse. Grösse kann mit lanes= und width= gemappt werden. Ich würde sagen das ist ein service, oder ein unclassified. Service ist ja schon nur ein Zubringer, und die Busstrasse verbindet ja die beiden Industriegebiete. Aber da sie relativ kurz ist und exklusiv für den Bus, fand ich jetzt service trotzdem nicht ganz unpassend.
MapmakingYak (2019-04-13 18:16:31+00:00): So betrachtet macht service wirklich mehr Sinn. Ich ändere es zurück. Merci fürs Feedback!
DP24PH (2019-04-17 11:50:48+00:00): By the way, when is the one-way scheme will last for? Hopefully, most Provincial Buses will pass-thru Taal Vista and Sky Ranch for East Bound to PITX.
schadow1 (2019-04-21 07:12:05+00:00): Ends today Apr 21. Reverted 69417734
geri-oc (2019-04-14 08:34:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116026328
Hier sind noch unterschiedliche Werte für vorwärts und rückwärts eingetragen. Ist die 100 bergwärts oder talwärts oder in beide Richtungen?
Gruß Gerd
Mirsch0815 (2019-04-14 08:36:25+00:00): In beide Richtungen
geri-oc (2019-04-14 09:12:08+00:00): maxspeed:backward=70
maxspeed:forward=60
einfach löschen.

Eventuell bei iD unten "Alle Eigenschaften" aufklappen.
kielbasa (2019-04-13 00:17:36+00:00): Hi Pedo Paulino,

riverbanks are tagged this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683455127/history
viloan (2019-04-12 20:13:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-04-12 20:24:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-04-12 20:40:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-04-13 05:35:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-04-13 11:23:04+00:00): Dzięki za edycje!

Ale highway=bus_guideway jest dla obiektów typu https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Guided_bus_from_Trumpington_-_geograph.org.uk_-_2543891.jpg

Więcej informacji na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway

W tym miejscu poprawiłem z powrotem na poprawne tagowanie.

----
Czy edytor w przeglądarce w jakichś sposób sugerował że to użyte tagowanie jest poprawne? Jeśli tak to edytor lub jego tłumaczenie na polski może wymagać poprawek. Daj znać jeśli są one potrzebne.
MtieR (2019-04-12 21:33:01+00:00): Sorry, I added the Action Store A second Time, because my OsmAnd Map did not contain it. Dunno how to delete it
highflyer74 (2019-04-13 19:58:25+00:00): Hi!

I suggest to log into your OSM account. There you can edit the live data. OsmAnd is a very nice map app, but not suitable for editing the live database.

Should you need help, just let me know.
MtieR (2019-04-13 21:36:33+00:00): Hej, 
I tried to add s. th. with OsmAnd for the first time. To check the change I actually logged in here. When I found out that that shop was already added I wasn't able to undo my change. Or at least I don't know how.
highflyer74 (2019-04-14 14:29:42+00:00): Hello again!

I checked it and removed the double mapping. It was tagged onto the building itself. Usually POIs are mapped as a node inside of a building, especially if there are multiple POIs in one building.
jmapb (2019-04-18 18:27:43+00:00): Hi EmmaHawk, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions! I'm a mapper active in the NYC area and have a few notes about this addition.

The purpose of the "website" key is to add official contact information published online by the feature in question. If this gallery itself has a website, its url should go under the website key. But a Timeout article discussing an exhibit at the gallery should not be considered the gallery's official website.

If the TImeout article is the source of your information, it would be good to include the link in your changeset comments. (Some mappers may disagree with the practice of using magazines as a source for map objects, but that's a different discussion -- the important thing is to be clear about where the information is coming from.)

Also, it seems that Rorschach is not the name of this gallery, but rather the name of a temporary exhibition there that will be closing this weekend. If the gallery itself will last longer, try to find a permanent name for it. If it's just a popup location for this temporary exhibit, it probably shouldn't be added to OpenStreetMap -- best practices are not to map temporary features, and an exhibit that lasts only 12 days would definitely fall into that category.

Thanks and let me know if you have any questions -- I'm happy to assist with this or anything else on the map.

happy mapping, jmapb
BCNorwich (2019-04-13 06:15:19+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder if you are aware that you have deleted a footway from OSM, the one around the bandstand. If you are aware could you please say why? Or was the deletion inadvertent?

I can help reinstate it if you wish.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2019-04-17 15:04:19+00:00): path reinstated
abakus_uploader (2019-04-12 22:30:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_6110846 (2019-04-13 05:31:58+00:00): давай пояснюй 
ті чого херіш роботу 
бо все шо ті моє зніўів я реветну 

ти не пахан і не король укр спільноти шоб 
знищувати бо не понравилось
user_6110846 (2019-04-13 05:38:31+00:00): придурок заглянь туди де свіжі фотографіі 
нагадую фото застарілі 
по всьому остальному 

ти мене своїм особистісним баченням задрав
бігаєш за мною 
і хериш хериш 
тобі шо бля такі повноваження давали офіційно 

пішов геть і отчепись от моїх правок 

сидиш у києві малин районі і радомишль районі хер зна коли бував 
і начинаєщ 
витворять лайно як мязик
user_6110846 (2019-04-13 05:54:33+00:00): виборчі дільниці я повернув 

ти не король укр спільноти --- щоб захотіти і знищувати мою роботу

не знаєш чим заняться --- 
іди в окуповані територіі там стільки роботи 
чи пройдися Києвом з смартфоном і засніми комерційні обєкти шоб нанести нові і за допомогобю disused закрити які н ефункціонують 

ще подібн6а витівка і я ревертну кордон ОТГ який ти похерив і поверну стуатус ункласифіед в Українці 


  по твоей хотелці   одноосібній я згнищувати свою роботу не дам
user_6110846 (2019-05-01 06:53:55+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69164320

Зачем вы рисуете  лес по старым фотографиям возле Устинівка ?
Вы удалили лес там гденм он сейчас 
Why are you drawing wood from old photos near Ustynivka?
You removed the forest there gdenm it now
KKS (2019-05-01 08:52:23+00:00): незрозуміло написано
user_6110846 (2019-05-01 10:16:15+00:00): translation into Ukrainian 

Навіщо ви малюєте ліс за старими фотографіями біля Устинівка?
Ви видалили ліс там где він зараз є
KKS (2019-05-01 15:42:46+00:00): Є нові?
user_6110846 (2019-05-01 15:51:51+00:00): На жаль, картограф не хоче відповідати на запитання, а замість відповідей пише інформаційне сміття.

Unfortunately, the cartographer does not want to answer questions and instead of answers he writes informational garbage.
KKS (2019-05-01 20:01:01+00:00): Нажаль Міша ака Бондар Богдан - живе в видуманому власному світі, де він може задавати тільки питання, а не давати відповіді на них. У мене як доказ є Бінг. У тебе з доказів шо? - нічого.
Таке саме нічого як і по кордонам кадастру.
В тебе взагалі з доказів - абсолютний НУЛЬ! Постійне бла-бла-бла і з'їзжання з теми.
НАДАЙ
ДОКАЗИ
ЩО Я
ВИДАЛИВ ЛІС!
user_6110846 (2019-05-02 00:15:16+00:00): here.wego.com
user_6110846 (2019-05-02 00:17:05+00:00): wego.here.com
user_6110846 (2019-05-02 00:18:37+00:00): https://wego.here.com/?map=50.73885,29.0032,15,satellite
KKS (2019-05-02 14:54:04+00:00): Ого, навіть з третього разу вийшло! Прогрес! А тепер роби скрін того лісу що я видалив. Бо конкретики знов 0
user_6110846 (2019-04-13 11:05:08+00:00): Не видаляйте теґи, які вам незрозумілі
- це правило як раз Вас стосується
isidor (2019-06-12 10:59:06+00:00): Ahoj,
obrysy strechy nie sú časti budovy, toto je nesprávny postup, prosím nepokračuj v ňom.
seawolff (2019-10-29 20:08:42+00:00): "military=barracks" beschreibt ein Kasenengelände. 
Das Einzelgebäude bleibt "building".
local scanner (2019-10-29 20:40:27+00:00): ok. Im englischen Wiki-Eintrag kann man es auch anders verstehen. In der deutschen Version ist es deutlicher geschrieben.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-12 22:53:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69165576 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed import in Greenland again.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2667 for details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-12 22:54:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69165576 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed import in Greenland again.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2667 for details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-12 22:53:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69165576 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed import in Greenland again.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2667 for details
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-12 22:54:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69165576 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed import in Greenland again.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2667 for details
PT-53 (2019-04-13 06:39:12+00:00): Hallo TS89000,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz versehentlich das Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622296611/history um über 600m nach Nordost verschoben.
Ich habe das mal so belassen, damit Du Dir das selbst noch anschauen kannst.
Schiebst Du das Gebäude - unter Nutzung von Maps4BW für die genaue Lage - wieder zurück oder soll ich das machen?
Fragende Grüße
TS89000 (2019-04-13 09:48:28+00:00): Das sollte eigentlich nicht passieren. PT-53, würdest du das Haus zurückschieben.Ich muss mich erst noch mit Maps4BW auseinandersetzen. Noch besser wäre, wenn man die letzte Änderung für das Objekt zurücksetzen könnte.
Danke.
PT-53 (2019-04-13 11:00:58+00:00): Verschiebung zurückgesetzt.
Grüße
FarmFreshMaps (2019-04-15 15:25:49+00:00): Alignments made to Mapbox, not Digital Globe Standard
PT-53 (2019-05-27 06:33:53+00:00): Hallo AmmoBox,
Du hast dieses Straßenstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683457681/history zur Einbahnstraße gemacht, versehentlich in der falschen Fahrrichtung. Dadurch war die B 19 Richtung Norden nicht mehr erreichbar.
Ich habe das Straßenstück gedreht.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-05-27 06:39:10+00:00): Hallo AmmoBox, 
ich korrigiere mich. Der Kreisel ist ja anscheinend nur halbseitig befahrbar. Ich habe die Drehung deshalb auch nicht hochgeladen.
Bis wann kann den mit einer Fertigstellung gerechnet werden?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-05-27 06:46:07+00:00): PS:
Du hast die westl. Hälfte des Kreisverkehrs mit construction=yes als Baustelle markiert. Das ist falsch. Eine Straßenbaustelle wird mit highway=construction + constructuion=primary korrekt gekennzeichnet.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction
Änderst Du das noch.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-06-02 06:44:55+00:00): Hallo AmmoBox, 
es wäre schön wenn Du noch antworten würdest.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-06-09 07:49:02+00:00): Hallo AmmoBox, 
wie ich gesehen habe, hast Du gestern die halbseitige Sperrung des Kreisverkehres freigegeben.
Wenn das ein normaler Kreisverkehr ist, sollte noch junction=roundabout ergänzt und oneway=yes gelöscht werden. Siehe Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:junction%3Droundabout
Die Note auf der östlichen Kreisel-Hälfte ist auch nicht mehr nötig und sollte weg.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-06-19 04:56:22+00:00): Hallo AmmoBox,,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
AmmoBox (2019-06-19 17:05:35+00:00): Ja kann ich machen, tut mir leid das ich mich jetzt erst melde da den größtenteils macht ein bot für mich der anscheinend fehlerhaft ist
highflyer74 (2019-06-19 21:44:10+00:00): Hallo AmmoBox! Wenn Du einen Bot betreibst, solltest Du Dir folgende zwei Links durchlesen und beachten:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bot

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
PT-53 (2019-06-30 04:16:43+00:00): Du hast diesen Kreisel https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698311974/history neu eingezeichnet. Die östl. Kreiselhälfte https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683457687/history existiert aber auch noch. Somit liegen auf der östl. Hälfte jetzt 2 Straßen übereinander.
Bereinigst Du das noch?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-07 06:27:18+00:00): Hallo AmmoBox,
kümmerst Du Dich noch um den teilweise doppelten Kreisel?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-14 06:12:08+00:00): Hallo AmmoBox, 
ich habe jetzt die doppelte Kreisel-Hälfte gelöscht.
Schade daß Du nicht reagiert hast.
Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-12 22:54:01+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69164951, 69164956, 69164965, 69164968, 69164981, 69164991, 69164995, 69164999, 69165002, 69165014, 69165017, 69165028.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-12 22:58:25+00:00): Problem is not Greenland but Rochester - see 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2668 .
eggie (2019-04-13 06:03:27+00:00): Beste De Verbinding... Waarom dan maar de hele landuse verwijderen? Dit wordt als vandalisme beschouwd.
Ook is dit al eerder besproken en teruggedraaid.

MVG,
Eggie
JeroenHoek (2019-04-13 08:00:05+00:00): De verbinding: ligt uw problemen gerust toe op het forum:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=745350#p745350

We kunnen u daar beter helpen als u niet rücksichtslos elementen van de kaart verwijderd.
JeroenHoek (2019-04-13 08:14:16+00:00): Ik heb een aantal wegen op privétoegang gezet. Kijk eens of dat voor u werkt?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69170630#map=16/52.2133/5.6517
eggie (2019-04-13 06:00:51+00:00): Behalve de adresnodes kunnen de gebouwen zelf dan ook weg.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-13 05:59:18+00:00): Dag De verbinding.
Beter niet met access=no beginnen behalve als er een bod Verboden Toegang staat.
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-13 08:47:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69171309 where the changeset comment is: Reverting more Rochester sockpuppetry - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2614 etc.
kielbasa (2019-04-13 00:19:31+00:00): Dear Fordeli,

thanks for fixing the coastline. May you please remove the "source"="PGS" tag after you've completely fixed a coast segment?

Kind regards
snitch (2019-05-01 13:45:12+00:00): Please avoid such wide-stretching changesets.
saintam1 (2019-04-13 06:14:50+00:00): Hello, as a note on the object says, "No Name" is the actual name of the bar. I will add it back.
frosm (2019-04-14 19:26:19+00:00): bonjour,
j'ai fais la modif
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5339126922
ce que je n'ai par contre pas compris c'est le tag disant qu'il y a une rampe d'accès, chose qu'on retrouve généralement sur un escalier
bonne continuation
Prenol (2019-04-14 23:40:06+00:00): justement c'est ça le truc, c'est que à cet endroits il y a pas de place de parking les voiture ne peuvent y accéder. Mais juste un panneau indiquant qu'il y a un juste emplacement pour que les personnes handicapé puissent regarder l'eau tranquillement sans risque de tomber.
Prenol (2019-04-14 23:44:27+00:00): en gros il y a une rampe qui sort depuis la route et qui va vers le rebord du lac
Prenol (2019-04-14 23:47:07+00:00): il faudrait taguer pour dire que à cette endroit il y'a un petit emplacement accessible pour handicapé ou ils peuvent se poser avec leur chaise roulante.
Jon Harald Søby (2019-04-14 00:02:08+00:00): I forgot to change the changeset comment from my previous JOSM edit. This has nothing to do with Sami and Kven names – I mainly refined a forest object in this edit.
Váradi Attila (2019-04-14 06:26:26+00:00): You splitted the large forest multipolygon in two pieces. The smaller is is ok, but the bigger is not rendering anymore. The whole forest is missing in Padure Craiului mountains.
Váradi Attila (2019-04-14 07:45:23+00:00): The problem is bigger than expected. The multipolygon splitting action, affects also the Bihor mountain forest area. I recomend you to make a full revert of your changeset, or rebuild the boundary (outer) line of the multipolygon, and close it.
B_KSL (2019-04-15 03:54:04+00:00): It is already fixed. Split into smaller pieces and one segment excluded from this mp. It seems to be rendered proper again.
Váradi Attila (2019-04-15 12:27:04+00:00): Great job! You resolved the problem, the rendering is fine. Thanks.
Adamant1 (2019-04-20 10:37:49+00:00): Where's this zoning.pdf that shows Quaker Center as a park that you speak of?
stevea (2019-04-20 17:20:15+00:00): It was published by the Santa Cruz County GIS department circa 2009.  Please read our county wiki for further history and the reasoning behind this, where Quaker Center is mentioned by name.  After a 2009 hike consisting of user:nmixter, userApo42 and me, nmixter's import of SCCGIS's landuse polygons and userApo42's import of state parks, I began to improve both (as did they and other OSM volunteers) and our wiki was born to document what was going on in the county.

In 2012, Santa Cruz County won a BestOfOSM.org Gold Star award, one of the few places in North America to enjoy this accolade, where the site notes Santa Cruz has "near perfect landuse!"  This wasn't just me (or Apo or Nate), many Santa Cruz area OSM editors stand on many people's shoulders as we enjoy this recognition.
Adamant1 (2019-04-22 00:30:00+00:00): I already read it and there was no mention of parks or beaches in it that I could find. Let alone this particular place. Although, I might have missed it, but probably not. 

As far as the bestofOSM.org award goes, I'm pretty sure that was for "coverage" more than accuracy. As I highly doubt the they double checked every single tiny landuse area to make sure it was what its tagged as. There's zero way they could have. Although, they could have easily looked to see that there is a wide of amount of "landuse mapped."  It's obvious that's what they did to because of all the overlapping etc landuse that still exists, which is "wide coverage" but not "accurate coverage." So, the award is completely irrelevant to this particular situation. Good on you getting it, but it wining an award does not equal "this is a park." 

As far as if this is a park or not, the Quaker Center doesn't consider it one, the county/city/tagging consider it one. The actual Quaker Center doesn't consider itself one. Tagging history doesn't make it one, your award doesn't make it one. What does if it is and it's not. It's a convention center and should be tagged as such. Not as a park. Other convention centers in OSM and California aren't tagged as parks. There's zero this one should be "because I won an award." The landuse use can be civic, commercial, or some other thing that's not leisure=park and the actual building should be tagged as a community center or maybe a social facility. As per their own description of what they do "retreat center in northern California that offers simple, modestly priced, comfortable accommodations." Sounds like a social facility to me. Or there's always landuse=religious since it's related to the Quakers. Still not a park though any more then a church yard or the area around a Buddhist temple is. I'll add religious areas, civic centers, and social facilities to my "things Steve thinks are parks" list though. Along with "because I won an award" to my "reasons Steve Thinks things currently tagged as parks should stay that way" list. With "because some other people edited it at some point."
stevea (2019-04-22 20:08:09+00:00): "Please read our county wiki for further history and the reasoning behind this, where Quaker Center is mentioned by name."
Adamant1 (2019-04-23 03:16:49+00:00): I misplaced the link and it's not showing up in search for some reason. Can you provide it again?
gcamp (2019-08-16 19:55:44+00:00): Hey Jarek, I saw that some way were set as access=foot, which is not a valid tag. (Example way/297036628). I think you meant for access=yes and foot=yes. Hope this helps!
Jarek 🚲 (2019-08-17 00:27:23+00:00): Ah thanks! I'll note. I can't recall what exactly I intended for that way. Perhaps that it's only suitable for foot, and not for example for cycling? What would the proper combination be then - perhaps foot=yes + bicycle=no? access=no + foot=yes tends to render it as private in the main osm.org layer which discourages me from that option.
Stretch Longfellow (2019-05-06 16:03:31+00:00): Rural roads are marked as minor/unclassified, not tertiary. Please fix this error.