piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maciek-szn (2015-06-25 08:20:21+00:00): 1. "Nazwa inna", czyli co? Rzeka? Las? Dzielnica?
2. Nie widzę powodu, dla którego akurat w tym przypadku miałbym stosować tag source:name, skoro nie został on użyty w setkach innych ulic w mieście.
3. Być może dane na gis.um.szczecin.pl uległy modyfikacji - nie jestem w stanie śledzić zmian. Aczkolwiek nie widzę rozbieżności w rejonie węzła Szczecin Podjuchy między OSM a GIS-em.
4. Nazwę Autostrada posiada także odcinek drogi ekspresowej S3 na północ od rzeki Chełszcząca (a wcześniej, przed wydłużeniem A6, na północ od węzła Kijewo).
5. Z całym szacunkiem, ale chociaż jestem w projekcie OSM dłużej od Ciebie, to w życiu do głowy by mi nie przyszło robić tak dużą zmianę w obcym dla mnie terenie (a po obszarze dokonywanych przez Ciebie zmian wnioskuję, że jednak nie jesteś szczecinianinem) tylko dlatego, że coś mi się wydaje. Serio, "lokalsi" mają niezłą wiedzę o swoim terenie.
muralito (2015-06-24 22:36:59+00:00): Eduardo, lo que va como building=yes es solo el edificio en si. Lo que podes hacer es marcar por un lado todo el predio del lugar y dibujar el edificio aparte.

Los deportes no pueden describirse de cualquier manera, muchos tienen que ser de la lista ya determinada, "soccer", "basketball", "volleyball", sino no hay forma de poder interpretar adecuadamente esa información por las muchas aplicaciones que usan OSM.

Saludos,
M.
gecho111 (2015-07-01 15:55:21+00:00): This is absolutely not James Hill road. When it comes to Harbour Landing Google is a complete mess and not to be trusted at all.  You shouldn't be copying off a copyrighted source anyway.
flohoff (2015-06-26 11:46:52+00:00): Hallo Heribert,
mach dir nicht so viel Mühe die Straßen immer da runterzugehen und auszunehmen. Dann mach lieber kleinere flächen ...

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=32193080

Das sieht ja nicht Hübsch aus - und nachbearbeiten möchte ich das auch nicht.

Flo
maraf24 (2015-06-25 22:41:21+00:00): Co ma oznaczać highway=stop dla tej drogi? 
To jest tag dla oznaczenia miejsca zatrzymania wynikającego ze znaku STOP (B-20).
lubosb (2015-06-28 11:30:38+00:00): I think you should fix name from bastimentos chool -> bastimentos School. 

Also if it does have name in spanish, then tags name=Escuela de Bastimentos and name:en= Bastimentos school will be better.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-25 02:06:18+00:00): Dlaczego skasowałeś obiekty wokół szkoły? Proszę o odpowiedź, w przeciwnym wypadku wycofam tę zmianę.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-25 10:57:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32202399
literan (2015-06-25 13:34:31+00:00): highway=pedestrian это пешеходная улица, как Арбат или Кузнецкий мост. Правильный тег здесь будет highway=footway.

И никаких embankent не надо - это тег насыпи
MatuDuke (2015-06-24 23:16:28+00:00): Please reject this change, I made a mistake. Sorry :(
Владимир К (2016-04-13 12:29:42+00:00): а куда вывозят мусор из этих баков? там действительно раздельный сбор мусора? просто на яндекс панорамах это выглядит как обычная помойка
Paul_012 (2016-09-20 22:04:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted because it introduced bad building geometry.
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2019-01-20 04:28:55+00:00): This edit is now partially reverted in changeset 66467772 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66467772> in the area of Sitabutr Bamrung school.

Note that what drawn as a public park here is actually school's assembly area and sports field, not open to outsiders.
Paul_012 (2016-09-13 23:01:21+00:00): This edit has been reverted by changeset 42137778 because it introduced bad parallax errors.
Paul_012 (2016-09-20 21:19:38+00:00): This edit has been partially reverted because it caused misalignment due to parallax errors.
Paul_012 (2016-09-20 22:36:08+00:00): This edit has been reverted because it erroneously removed data.
Paul_012 (2016-09-28 19:03:57+00:00): This edit has been partially reverted because it introduced inaccuracies.
Paul_012 (2016-09-13 23:02:02+00:00): This edit has been partially reverted by changeset 42137778 due to causing parallax errors.
Paul_012 (2016-09-20 21:46:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted because it introduced bad building geometry.
Stereo (2015-06-25 13:59:35+00:00): IIRC ass do keng vëlosspuer/cycleway, also nëmmen oneway:bicycle=no. Brauchs du dat fir déng Navigatioun?
gcaspar (2015-06-25 15:13:21+00:00): aner Einbahnstroossen an der Stad dei fir den Vëlo opp sinn goufen och esou gezeechend. wäert awer sinn dat däin oneway:bicycle=no wuel duer geet
is-zUser (2017-02-13 22:58:28+00:00): Wie kommt denn eine solche Wohngebiets-Fläche zustande??? Wohngebiete enden auch nicht an der Bordsteinkante.
eggie (2022-03-07 13:58:21+00:00): Dag Dré.. Nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Supaplex (2020-07-03 07:48:11+00:00): 不好意思，你將農場標到墳墓區了，看來是標錯了，能否提供精確的位置?
dan74mm (2015-06-25 11:14:52+00:00): Please delete this version because we created a newer version is more accurate.
dan74mm (2015-06-25 11:15:12+00:00): Please delete this version because we created a newer version is more accurate.
CloCkWeRX (2017-01-14 11:52:39+00:00): I've checked a lot of these against LPI basemap imagery, and most are pretty accurate. A few (Evergreen Drive) aren't in LPI; suggesting maybe the master plan was revised. Are you able to find out if anything has been dropped from the development?
Zhent (2017-01-15 06:36:10+00:00): Not sure. I would recommend on the ground surveys as the best way to keep up from here on out.
mavl (2015-06-25 17:59:36+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Сожалею, что вынужден беспокоить вас.
Вы уверены, что это населённый пункт и что это Нефтяник?
В Абатском районе нет такого населённого пункта. Посёлок Нефтяник есть только в Сорокинском районе (один на всю Тюменскую область).

По закону Тюменской области № 263 в этом месте есть только такие населённые пункты:

Конёвское сельское поселение

д. Бития
с. Конево
д. Лапина
д. Поротникова
д. Чумашкина
д. Шалашина
lavanya1 (2019-07-23 05:42:23+00:00): "Hi  AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 356256912 classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
dan74mm (2015-06-25 11:15:25+00:00): Please delete this version because we created a newer version is more accurate.
dan74mm (2015-06-25 11:15:40+00:00): Please delete this version because we created a newer version is more accurate.
Pietras32 (2015-06-25 12:32:46+00:00): Wszystko co zrobiłem było uzasadnione. Część obiektów przestała istnieć (boisko do siatkówki oraz duże boisko do piłki nożnej), sala gimnastyczna została zamknięta dla ludzi z zewnątrz. Zbigniew_Czernik zauważ że skoro ja nanosiłem te obiekty to również wiem jak dokładnie wygląda ich sytuacja. Dziękuję za twoją czujność.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-25 12:47:21+00:00): No to nic, skasuj jeszcze raz w takim razie. Prośba na przyszłość - opisuj swoje zmiany, szczególnie jeśli coś usuwasz, żeby inni mieli pewność, że wiesz co robisz :-)
Pozdrawiam
Nakaner (2015-06-25 11:23:07+00:00): This and all similar changeset will be reverted soon due to a multiple violation of our policies!
robbieonsea (2015-07-03 21:03:47+00:00): This edit seems to contain random deletions. I was at Pencilli camp site recently at the end of May. Those camp site service roads are still there!
Please use changeset comments to explain your edits:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
robbieonsea (2015-08-18 20:51:02+00:00): I've now reverted this change.
naoliv (2015-06-30 02:43:24+00:00): Gabrielle, o que você quis fazer nessa sua edição?
Você alterou incorretamente o limite de Campinas
pangoSE (2018-08-13 05:48:45+00:00): Hej :)
Det ser ut att vara gräs på många av pisterna på Bing under trädgränsen så jag undrar om =fell är rätt landuse för hela denna multipolygon. Vad tycker du?
leojth (2018-08-13 19:28:19+00:00): Hej! Jag var osäker på vad jag skulle sätta för tagg. Fritt fram att ändra till något bättre :)
trigpoint (2015-06-26 12:21:21+00:00): Hey, you seem to have moved the cyclelane to the right hand side of the road, even though it is clearly visible on the left on bing. Remember we drive on the left and a cycle lane on the right would be very dangerous.
pkoby (2015-06-26 14:10:43+00:00): Sorry about that. You're right, I got confused about the directions of the oneways. I've been cycling around, so I have been getting used to the left-side driving. Thanks for fixing this.
d1g (2015-06-25 16:05:16+00:00): Что-то много дорог для survey, есть gps трек?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:source

Если каааааждый метр дороги не был осмотрен с 5-20 метров, то это не survey.

У дорог будет много пропусков этого
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.57203/45.89154

и этого 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.55335/46.02879

просто сотни, если не тысячи

Я бы указывал highway=road и медленно указывал дороги по 3-20 кусков.

Все ворота, сужения, тропы, перекопанные дороги в мире не угадаешь.
d1g (2015-06-25 16:16:35+00:00): В СНТ всё очень плохо т.к. там в отличие от частного сектора могут быть 

- трубы через которые не проехать
- костры
- свалки дачного мусора

... по Bing они занимают 3-6 пикселей. Некоим образом их разглядеть нельзя если только не видеть каждый метр дороги или облететь местность с дрона (10-50 метров над землёй)
reneman (2015-06-28 21:43:43+00:00): Warum änderst du Streckennummern von xxxx-1 bzw. xxxx-2 in xxxx ???
Endres Pelka (2015-08-20 10:18:26+00:00): Wofür steht railway=Ortsstellbereich?
rayquaza (2015-10-19 12:25:40+00:00): @reneman: Weil die Angabe Richtungsgleis/Gegengleis/eingleisig nicht zur Streckennummer gehört. Ansonsten diskutiere lieber mit z.B. Nakaner, der ist nicht so inaktiv wie ich ;-)

@Jedrzej Pelka: Für einen Ortsstellbereich natürlich ;-) Hat halt leider noch niemand ein Tag für erfunden.
ignaciolep (2016-11-30 18:58:20+00:00): Hola Rosario, Excelente trabajo el de relevar los contenedores de basura o "puntos de arrojo" como vos los llamaste. Te comento que los contenedores de basura se etiquetan con amenity=waste_disposal. Ya corregí los 86 puntos que encontré. Para los próximos que agregues por favor usá esa etiqueta (en el editor iD aparece como "Contenedor de residuos".) Saludos! Nacho
joost schouppe (2016-01-22 14:34:21+00:00): It looks like you gave a little bit too many nodes the bicycle=yes tag. I noticed that this tree with a silly name node 3012115704 had a bicyle tag. I don't believe that's the idea. All tagged nodes nearby seem to have this tag too...
joost schouppe (2016-01-22 14:36:35+00:00): I just noticed how a lot of building nodes have the tag too...
Matthieu Gaillet (2016-01-22 15:56:52+00:00): Hi Joost, I obviously made a mistake, that was not intentional. Thank your for your kind understanding. I'll check this and repair.
joost schouppe (2016-01-22 16:14:41+00:00): Mistakes happen, especially if you do things :)
Thanks for following up
Matthieu Gaillet (2016-01-23 09:30:48+00:00): Hi, fixed, http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36754647

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/dVu
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-26 11:18:10+00:00): Przed rysowaniem z podkłądu Bing należy go najpierw skalibować - najlepiej do podkładu z Geoportalu.
Druga rzecz - w geodezji obrys budynku to jego przecięcie przez ściany na wysokości 1 metra. Piszę o tym, bo rysujesz te obrysy zbyt duże - miejscami większe niż obrys dachu.
WalkerOneFive (2015-06-25 16:39:17+00:00): Kommentar versehentlich falsch; Korrekte Beschreibung der Änderungen: Müllumladestation, Grünabfallplatz und ICO Logistik ergänzt.
Lamichhane (2020-01-05 14:12:20+00:00): thank you for editing here but your river is not really matching to the Bing imaginary. so will you plz check this once again and update the river and nearly by you have edited. but thank you anyway making the maps of nepal
Wh4tEver (2015-06-25 17:41:28+00:00): Zły opis. Tak naprawdę oznaczyłem niedawno ukończoną ścieżkę rowerową.
ratrun (2015-06-28 08:23:18+00:00): Deine Änderungen waren syntaktisch etwas fehlerhaft und ich habe versucht zu erraten was Du gemeint hast. Bitte überprüfe meine Änderungen, besonders die Verbindung im Südwesten zur L453.
trigpoint (2015-06-26 12:01:35+00:00): Hi
I am not sure how well you know Shrewsbury or when you , but Emstry Island was remodeled about 6 months ago. It no longer looks like bing imagery. There are a couple of recent traces on mapillary which show how it now looks.
When remote mapping, it is useful to compare the date of the bing imagery with the dates of the on the ground edits, especially when made by local mappers.
I am reverting this edit as it does not match the current on the ground layout.
pkoby (2015-06-26 14:10:39+00:00): Sorry about that. I've broken one of the basic rules. I thought I had been through this roundabout, so I apologize for confusing it with another one. Thanks for checking my edits. I'll make sure to verify what I'm doing with on-the-ground survey.
trigpoint (2015-06-26 12:11:30+00:00): Hi again.
You seem to have disconnected footway http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356357160 from the road, is there any reason for doing this? as you have left it it prevents use of the path for routing.
Cheers  Phil
pkoby (2015-06-26 14:10:41+00:00): Sorry about that. That was simply a mistake, not intentional.
TheOutpost (2015-06-25 20:00:42+00:00): yo!
TheOutpost (2015-06-25 20:01:06+00:00): This is a comment made by Nick.
SomeoneElse (2015-06-26 09:53:22+00:00): Yay!  Someone else trying to sort out the missing tracks in Nevada.

In case you don't already know, many of these tracks were originally imported as "residential roads" from TIGER data, but weren't very positionally accurate.  Lots of them were patched up a bit, and a large number were deleted by one user.  For example, your new track seems to be mostly part of this one that was deleted:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14378267/history

The changeset that deleted that also deleted lots of others:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/19941307

You may find it easier to "undelete" some of the deletions in there and then nudge them towards the path on the imagery rather than recreating from scratch (though you may need to use a different OSM editor to do that - I suspect that "iD" can't undelete previously deleted data).

I've been doing similar things a bit further south (see for example http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14388627 ).

Please don't hesitate to get in touch if you want to ask anything.
Goffredo (2015-06-25 22:29:39+00:00): Ciao, devo segnalarti che ci sono molte inesattezze in questo changeset:
1) la track inserita condivide dei nodi con il confine. ciò non va bene, confini e strade non dovrebbero avere nodi in comune.
2) la track è sovrapposta ad una via (!!) dove inizia, a sud-est.
3) la track condivide due nodi con un corso d'acqua: se ciò è vero, allora i nodi andrebbero segnati come guado (ford=yes), oppure vanno disegnati i ponti e non devono esserci punti in comune con il corso d'acqua.
4) la track è stata ricavata, credo, ricalcando senza pensarci troppo una traccia gps. Ok, va bene, ma se la traccia gps non è precisa, non esce un buon lavoro.

Mi scuso per la lunghezza del messaggio, a disposizione per chiarimenti :-)
mulozoppo (2015-06-25 22:52:52+00:00): ciao goffredo  ti ringrazio per  il tuo intervento ma e la prima traccia che carico e non sapevo l esisteza di nodi,vie,confini , ho ricalcato una traccia gpx le stesse che carico da anni ormai su altri siti senza errori di precisione,l acqua in qualsiasi forma non ce sono sicuro ,ne approfitto non ce un modo per caricare direttamente la traccia senza fare tutto sto macello di nodi ecc ecc...:-) ciao e grazie ancora
Goffredo (2015-06-25 23:29:09+00:00): Le traccie gps le puoi caricare senza problemi dalla tua pagina personale, voce "miei tracciati". Queste, poi, possono essere usate come sfondo da te o da altri utenti come guida per tracciare il percorso. È sconsigliato ricalcare la traccia direttamente, perché può avere una risoluzione di punti bassa, quindi è consigliabile integrare il ricalco della traccia con le foto aeree, meglio le PCN2012 rispetto alle Bing. Se vuoi saperne di più sull'argomento, mandami pure un messaggio, almeno non intasiamo la sicussione del changeset. Se vuoi fare un esercizio, prova  a correggere i punti da me elencati, poi posso verificare il tuo lavoro e darti un paio di dritte.
P.S. Benvenuto in OpenStreetMap!
RobertKihlberg (2016-03-17 12:41:41+00:00): Hi Christian, can you please explain which parts that are missing? I'm going for a hike in this area and I might be able to make Etapp 31 complete.
ChristianA (2016-03-17 16:34:47+00:00): Hej. Pratar du svenska? Anyway; I think that most parts of the actual trails are finished, though some parts may not be in the route relation for Sörmlandsleden. However, other features such as lakes, forests, shelter, toilets etc should perhaps be added.
RobertKihlberg (2016-03-17 19:17:17+00:00): Tjena, yes I do, but I thought I could make it understandable for more people. I see what you mean. I'm more into getting the big picture first and perhaps add some of the most crucial pieces that you mentioned (shelters, toilets, etc.) I see here (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Sweden/Hiking_trails) that it is only considered to be 76% done and I have not been able to figure out what needs to be done to finalize it.
ChristianA (2016-03-17 20:17:09+00:00): Detailed trail info from Sörmlandsleden requires membership, so I do not have more detailed information than the publicly available one at the Sörmlandsleden webpage.

Still I think it is also important to add the trails to the right route relations. I think thete should be one relation for the whole Sörmlandsleden and also one for each section. I am no expert on routes/relations though...
ChristianA (2016-03-19 07:52:28+00:00): Detailed trail info from Sörmlandsleden requires membership, so I do not have more detailed information than the publicly available one at the Sörmlandsleden webpage.

Still I think it is also important to add the trails to the right route relations. I think thete should be one relation for the whole Sörmlandsleden and also one for each section. I am no expert on routes/relations though...
Warin61 (2018-10-11 01:09:02+00:00): Hi,
On Way: 356375516 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
Alan (2015-06-25 22:22:41+00:00): I wish changesets had a like button.
Alan (2015-06-25 22:25:33+00:00): 💩👍
Oscar Z Wolf (2015-06-25 22:16:32+00:00): My dog wants to know: Why aren't dog parks appearing on the base map after they have been edited?
Harun-Ar-Rashid (2015-06-25 22:30:54+00:00): Hotel Banani
Proprietor: Kanchon Miah
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2015-06-27 23:15:48+00:00): Parkeringspladser tagges med 
amenity=parking
og ikke med area
Dakon (2016-06-16 18:22:51+00:00): Das :repeated an node 1020371583 sollte vermutlich ein :shortened sein?
rurseekatze (2016-06-16 19:06:53+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, das ist natürlich falsch. Ich habe es in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40074899 korrigiert.
Warin61 (2017-10-13 21:49:24+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for entering these while you were there. Some improvements for nest time, unless you have already changed the practice? 
These names look like they are all in capitals, they should be lower case maybe with a leading capital letter. 
The names should not be descriptive, but the real names used. If you want to add a description then use the description tag e.g. description=vehicle workshop.
MSF-Fieldco (2017-10-14 14:41:13+00:00): Thanks for the tips. I moved out of Mt. Hagen in early 2016, so I won't be updating the area anymore. It seems that it is in good hands anyway, thanks for keeping the map up to date.
GerdP (2015-10-16 06:44:25+00:00): I've corrected a few invalid tags like
highway=residential;road

If you are a local, please review 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34668639
unsungNovelty (2016-02-05 05:54:51+00:00): Hi, This whole area seems to be tagged with 'highway=road`. The changeset says this road will be demolished and reconstructed, but is this the latest update for this area?
Kindly reply.
Baloo Uriza (2016-02-05 10:17:16+00:00): This is intentional, as it's my understanding that highway=road is for roads short in the tooth.  This is currently the latest on this, I am proactively monitoring the situation in the Crossroads area.
5m4u9 (2015-07-05 01:33:22+00:00): Buena edición... algunos consejos...

* lugar cruce para peatones: no dibujar línea sino usar el punto y ahí definir.
* camino para cruce de peatones: la vía por donde circulan las personas sobre la línea de zebra es un footway que va desde una acera hasta la otra por medio de la calle en el punto de la zebra.
* canchas con techo: no olvidar que el techo de una cancha no es igual que la cancha en si, dibujar más pequeño que el techo.
utack (2015-09-04 12:19:46+00:00): Gehört bei dieser Relation die Einwohnerzahl rein, oder nicht?
5m4u9 (2015-07-05 01:35:58+00:00): Wow! gracias por añadir a punata. Veo que encontraste la forma de usar la otra capa "MapBox" más actual.

Acá en iD no es muy útil, pero en JOSM puedes acercar hasta lo más profundo y mejorar el trazo.
gorogoro (2015-07-06 18:06:36+00:00): jeje, ya lo viste... Punata estaba prácticamente desaparecida del mapa, estuve recopilando la información que puede y añadiéndola. Estoy pensando en convocar a grupos de facebook o ir a hacer un trazado con GPS
mavl (2015-06-26 04:11:42+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Необязательно было удалять этот полигон. Вполне можно было его переобозначить как промышленную территорию (landuse=industrial).
SomeoneElse (2015-06-30 14:05:28+00:00): Thanks - I've added a note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/389053 against the "supermarket" added by their other edit so that someone can check if it exists.
AhJong (2017-02-14 10:12:17+00:00): Хотелось бы узнать, для чего M1 получила атрибут toll, т.к. большинство автолюбителей, из данного и соседних регионов имеют право бесплатного проезда.

Данная ситуация обсуждалась на форуме в 2014 году и тогда решили не ставить toll на M1.
LLlypuk82 (2017-02-14 20:08:47+00:00): Это единственный рабочий вариант поддержки опции «избегать платных дорог» (для тех, кто реально подпадает под оплату). М1 ничем не отличается от всех остальных платных участков (которые постепенно добавляют по стране)
Вот более свежее обсуждение https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=55445
nevw (2025-02-17 01:48:45+00:00): Hi cleary, I noticed what appears to be an access gate but tagging is unclear.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3618906272#map=19/-23.401848/144.180508
cleary (2025-02-17 05:46:36+00:00): That was a careless error by me. I have now corrected it to barrier=cattle_grid.  I do not recall any gates on that road and, looking at satellite imagery, it appears to be a cattle grid. Further, my abbreviation for cattle_grid was "ca" and I appear to have transposed the letters when I was entering that abbreviation. Thanks for bringing the error to my attention. It brings back a happy recollection of my drive on that road some years ago.
nevw (2025-02-17 10:50:57+00:00): Thanks mate….an impressive memory.
MarkusHD (2015-08-12 06:14:22+00:00): Hier ist ein 250m-Abschnitt, der noch mit 80 statt 100 km/h getaggt ist. Hast du den vergessen oder ist das tatsächlich so?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132518942
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-01 09:45:00+00:00): W nazwach nie używamy wielkich liter - SZKOŁA PODSTAWOWA W SZCZEPANOWICACH - jest niepoprawna.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-01 09:48:08+00:00): Kolejna rzecz - proszę rysować do podładu z geoportalu - podkład bing jest przesunięty w stosunku do rzeczywistości.
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-06-28 06:33:42+00:00): Hi, why did you delete names from some ways, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352319225?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-11-17 13:00:43+00:00): Ustawiono access=no, ale brakuje informacji, jaki ruch jest dozwolony: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172250771
Olga | Yanosik (2015-11-17 13:13:51+00:00): Poprawione.