piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DevonF (2016-12-20 23:54:59+00:00): That's really awesome that aerial imagery is published under their opendata licence. Do you know if anyones converted it to a tile map on a public server? It'd be nice to add it JOSM

Also curious, would you mind posting a screenshot of the imagery you used to trace https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460776119 ?
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-21 00:19:07+00:00): Unfortunately DevonF I cannot as although carleton University allows creating derivative works and tracing from their aerial imagery, they do not allow to copy/redistribute it(only for students/faculty at Carleton university), doing so may be punishable by revocation of access to the imagery.

So if we are to follow the rules, yes I mind posting a screenshot of Carleton's dataset as it may result in the termination of my access.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-21 00:39:42+00:00): Also DevonF, if a user cant add 1000ish buildings without being the spanish inquisition, osm will fall behind everyone. It's probably why digital globe and a relief effort have forked OSM and started contributing to their own fork and not OSM, because small time mappers waste their time.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-21 02:35:23+00:00): Don't believe me? https://www.nga.mil/MediaRoom/PressReleases/Pages/2015-16.aspx
DevonF (2016-12-21 04:33:24+00:00): I agree nobody likes it when people are breathing down your neck and it's a waste of time checking every edit. However you have attracted some attention to yourself by some less-orthodox editing practices. But hopefully you'll be able to regain peoples trust. There are good reasons why I care about how large edits are carried out and where the data comes from such as avoiding mass errors and legal fees. It would be quite easy for a organization to check if any of their data has been imported. If your editing practices are acceptable, then I am totally behind the work you are doing and really appreciate it. For example I like that most of the bus stops have been mapped around Ottawa, a good step towards mapping the transit system.
DevonF (2016-12-21 04:33:45+00:00): After reading http://lifehacker.com/193343/ask-the-law-geek--is-publishing-screenshots-fair-use I'd say it's pretty damn safe to share a screenshot. But it looks like it's the same as what's hosted at http://maps.ottawa.ca. You can access JS slippy maps and WMTS api via http://maps.ottawa.ca/arcgis/rest/services. It'd be nice to know what the licensing is on it, I'd love to use it for OSM. Do you know who to ask? Otherwise I'll try to find someone. Reading http://maps.ottawa.ca/geoottawa/help/en/FAQ.htm suggests that at least the 2005 air photo dataset is under opendata 2.0.
But looking at the air photos from maps.ottawa.ca throughout the years, it's still puzzling as to how you managed to end up with those footprints. That one way is of a completely different shape of house.
DevonF (2016-12-21 04:33:52+00:00): That's really awesome about https://github.com/ngageoint/hootenanny. There are so many powerful tools which I dream about for making mapping much more fun and safe for everyone. I'm not sure where I see it mentioned about forking though. Many one-off contributors are just as important as massive imports. I think it's a symbiotic relationship.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-21 10:31:04+00:00): I'm not using ottawa'ortho I know its from 2005. Im using the 2014 from carleton u that their gis department took(2014) http://carleton-u.maps.arcgis.com/apps/PublicInformation/index.html?appid=a9602c9a15fd4db898c7b8a264442038
As I am taking classes there, I have access to it.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-21 11:30:39+00:00): Here's a ss of that building, now if you dont mind, i'll return to tracing.
http://imgur.com/a/pzdNL
DevonF (2016-12-22 18:30:30+00:00): The CU and Ottawa datasets are the same for 2014 judging by your screenshot. Here's a side-by-side of the house you added and the 2014 imagery http://imgur.com/a/pQZwP. I wouldn't be surprised if there's a house somewhere else with an incorrect footprint matching this house. I think this strongly reinforces the importance of the import guidelines.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-22 18:33:03+00:00): Devon quit wasting my time. maybe learn some HOT mapping or learn some building tracing, I'm not here to hold your hand.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-22 18:38:36+00:00): This is from bing: http://imgur.com/a/9zU2K I may have missed some of the building, but i'm trying to trace quickly. I admit that the OttawaCarleton imagery is different, but I used a combination of Mapbox,Bing, OttawaOrtho and Carleton.
DenisCarriere (2016-12-22 18:56:59+00:00): Devon, your numerous comments in Canada are becoming very annoying to many of the "power" mappers. Just because you like to use iD & OSMAnd to map 1-2 features at the time. Some users are using JOSM to map multiple hundreds of buildings at a time.

You should spend your time doing more productive things instead of investigating every possible edit in Canada.

Your "Casual Mapper" account status is not impressing anyone here, you should focus on mapping instead of commenting on every changeset.

http://hdyc.neis-one.org/?DevonF
woodpeck (2016-12-22 19:21:36+00:00): Denis, you should be ashamed at trying to pull rank at someone whose comments you don't like. Stick to the facts.
woodpeck (2016-12-22 19:28:09+00:00): LogicalViolinist, there is no way anyone would trace the building in http://imgur.com/a/9zU2K from the imagery in that picture. Neither Bing nor Mapbox nor whatever is in that picture has the detail to trace that outline. Not even a combination of all of them. -- And the only thing you have to say in your defense is "stop wasting my time" and then Denis comes in and tries to silence criticism by pointing to his superior edit numbers? What is going on here?
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-22 19:33:36+00:00): Hi woodpeck, as you may know Denis and I know eachother in real life and are local mappers to the Gatineau/Ottawa valley. Is it surprising that I may have linked him my changeset via chat? No? Ok.

http://imgur.com/a/dRNnD
See how the white pixels follow the thing I traced? Well I followed the pixels! If you want me to fix the back portion of the house I can, but I don't want to be accused of trying to cover it up.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-22 19:39:45+00:00): http://imgur.com/a/3BmD5
The top I followed the pixels again.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-22 19:43:36+00:00): Not sure why so much scrutiny is going into one building when some people would just draw a rectangle over it and call it a day. Would they be brought in a microscope analysis of what they did and did not do? Nope. If you want me to fix the back of the house I'll gladly do it, but don't accuse me of importing data, when I have learned my lesson from the Ottawa Import(which I'm trying to have it through the proper channels: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2016-December/007569.html)
scruss (2016-12-23 01:23:26+00:00): Sorry, but it doesn't look as if you can use the Carleton data to trace from: https://library.carleton.ca/sites/default/files/find/gis/DataUseAgreement.pdf
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-23 10:57:03+00:00): Thay seems to be talking about the imagery directly and not derivative work scruss
scruss (2016-12-23 13:46:13+00:00): Are your OSM contributions "for the exclusive purposes of teaching or academic research" at Carleton? If not, you can't use the data here, and you've signed something to say you won't when you started your course. Derivative works retain rights too: that's why we can't copy from Google Maps.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-23 13:53:30+00:00): I'll start working on reverting the changesets that used this imagery then.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-23 14:38:39+00:00): Started the revert process
osmcanada_fix (2016-12-23 16:05:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44622688 where the changeset comment is: Reverted traced buildings due to imagery source
rab (2016-12-20 17:20:27+00:00): Hi,
when deleting the members, please consider to delete the relation also.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6740216#map=12/-21.7039/30.8595
(was meant, as explanation of my interprtation of the imagery, down there)
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:29:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
osmcanada_fix (2016-12-23 15:14:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44622600 where the changeset comment is: Reverted traced buildings due to imagery source
SomeoneElse (2022-05-21 10:50:21+00:00): Hello 136154,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 5 years ago.  On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2467556010 here.  We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source. 
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
roptat (2018-01-01 06:03:34+00:00): Salut ! Désolé de revenir sur un ancien changeset, mais que signifie une largeur négative (width=-2) ?
diskmanti (2018-01-04 12:21:03+00:00): Je e sigurt qe ka nje stacion bus ne kete pike?!
geri-oc (2016-12-22 15:10:58+00:00): Bitte lade keine Änderungen hoch, wenn du Fehlermeldungen erhälst. Du hast teilweise doppelte Linien und Landflächen an Wegen. Bei Fragen gern erst einmal schreiben - es sind um Seifersdorf derzeit viele Fehler.
Gruß Gerd
ququruzka (2020-12-09 12:10:55+00:00): please, copy name:uk=* into name=* 
because Ukraine must consists only ukrainian names in POI, names, etc
Glassman (2016-12-20 18:32:07+00:00): I added shop=cannabis to help search engines find the site. The location looks like it's in the trees alongside of the road. Can you move it closer to the door of the building?
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-19 21:27:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53082643 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by user e9aga8f
MrYadro (2016-12-20 19:57:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the tip. I won't.
highflyer74 (2016-12-22 14:36:18+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du die Grenzrelation von Niedersachsen bearbeitet hast. Da Dein OSM Account noch brandneu ist, ist es eher ungewöhnlich, sich als ersten Bearbeitungsschritt eine Grenzrelation vorzunehmen, da diese eher etwas für erfahrene Mapper sind.

Nachdem ich mir die von Dir vorgenommenen Änderungen angesehen habe, verstehe ich nicht ganz, warum Du haufenweise vorhandene Informationen entfernt hast.

Sei so nett, kurz zu erklären, was der Grund für die Löschungen ist.

Auch wichtig ist es, aussagekräftige Changeset Kommentare zu machen. "Niedersachsen" reicht da nicht aus. Bitte lies Dir hierzu den Artikel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments durch und mache Dich auch sonst mit OSM vertraut.

Viele Grüße!
luschi (2016-12-22 21:39:16+00:00): revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44602528
highflyer74 (2016-12-23 12:52:14+00:00): Danke Dir!
Koen VO (2016-12-20 18:56:26+00:00): De wegen starten op het terrein anders dan oorspronkelijk aangegeven, wat verwarring met zich meebrengt wanneer je aan het lopen of het fietsen bent. Niet echt "big deal" uiteraard, want ze leiden naar hetzelfde punt. Als er iets niet ok is, geen probleem met de aanpassingen.
toeklk (2016-12-20 19:01:03+00:00): Ah, ik neem aan dat je met 'anders starten' bedoelt dat de oriëntatie initieel niet nauwkeurig genoeg is bv.?  Alle verbeteringen zijn welkom!
Koen VO (2016-12-21 07:03:24+00:00): inderdaad! :-)
Komяpa (2016-12-20 20:04:21+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Пожалуйста, не удаляйте корректные данные из OpenStreetMap. Тротуары в OpenStreetMap приветствуются: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A2%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%82%D1%83%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%8B

Правка откачена: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44550045
jpennycook (2016-12-24 19:35:37+00:00): primitive GPS technology unfortunately
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:49:05+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Carlos Brys (2017-02-06 20:19:48+00:00): Este cajero automático aparece en una ubicación que no aparece apropiada.
Voy a eliminar este nodo
trigpoint (2016-12-20 19:39:11+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. I think that something has gone a bit wrong here. We normally change the tagging on a closed pub to disused:amenity=pub. For some reason you have changed the name of the bus stop.
trigpoint (2016-12-20 19:36:56+00:00): Hi, I don't think the postbox is actually named Post Box. The name tag should not normally be filled in for object such a postboxes.
ToniE (2016-12-21 08:46:34+00:00): Hallo hangy,

hier ...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4453886932

wäre auch noch einer. 
Soll ich den entspr. anpassen, oder möchtest Du das machen?

Here ...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4453886932

is another one, shall I or would you like to adapt that?

Gruß/regards
Toni
hangy (2016-12-21 09:28:51+00:00): Hi Toni,

danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe eben nochmal per Nominatim gesucht und noch ein paar weitere entsprechende Nodes gefunden. Das werde ich mir gleich mal anschauen und alles gerade ziehen.

-hangy
ToniE (2016-12-21 09:32:38+00:00): Alles klar,
Gruß
Toni
Peter Dobratz (2017-01-01 21:08:53+00:00): Please be careful that the roads you are creating actually connect to the other roads.  I've seen some of your service road additions where it fails the "Way end node near other highway" JOSM validator test.
user_3735764 (2017-01-01 21:23:08+00:00): That's weird. I never upload a changeset without fixing validation errors first.
Peter Dobratz (2017-01-01 22:04:35+00:00): Yeah, the JOSM validator sometimes doesn't pick up things the first time (may have to do with the subset of OSM objects it is considering based on the context).  You can try running the JOSM validator multiple times before and after uploading.

This particular problem with service roads not connecting up to nearby roads seems fairly common.  For example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27401001
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463020143

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/463020067
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125831179

If you have a chance, can you review your own changsets to find these?
user_3735764 (2017-01-01 22:58:04+00:00): Interesting, I've never had this issue before of roads not connecting up. I always make sure that they are connected. I wonder if its a software issue on my end. Thanks for letting me know and I'll fix those changesets.
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 21:01:39+00:00): AT: revert CS 44549442 44549263, for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects without specifying a source; moving place nodes for the renderer; moving objects without reason;
in CS 48514216.
way 460801404 restored in cs 48514431
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 20:51:48+00:00): AT: revert CS 44549442 44549263, for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects without specifying a source; moving place nodes for the renderer; moving objects without reason;
in CS 48514216.
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 20:41:53+00:00): DE: revert CS 44549756 44549626 44549534, for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects without specifying a source; moving place nodes for the renderer; moving objects without reason; implausible move of address nodes -
in cs 48513963
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 20:42:03+00:00): DE: revert CS 44549756 44549626 44549534, for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects without specifying a source; moving place nodes for the renderer; moving objects without reason; implausible move of address nodes - 
in cs 48513963
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 20:42:08+00:00): DE: revert CS 44549756 44549626 44549534, for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects without specifying a source; moving place nodes for the renderer; moving objects without reason; implausible move of address nodes - 
in cs 48513963
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 20:32:37+00:00): DE: revert CS 44550010 for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects without specifying a source; moving place nodes for the renderer;
in 48513719
aceman444 (2025-07-29 15:15:01+00:00): The node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4564113705 is wrong, those footways do not intersect, they are at different levels in the building. Do not change things blindly when you haven't visited them to understand the situation.
maraf24 (2016-12-22 21:54:10+00:00): Miejscowość to Ślęza, a nie Kobierzyce:)
leszek89 (2016-12-22 23:50:41+00:00): Owszem, miejscowość to Ślęza, ale obowiązuje tam kod pocztowy Kobierzyc.
Takie dane są podane na stronie internetowej basenu: http://www.basensleza.pl/kontakt
maraf24 (2016-12-23 01:05:31+00:00): No właśnie, miejscowość to Śleza.
Ze stosowania miejscowości poczty zrezygnowano oficjalnie w 2011.
W OSM nie stosujemy w ogóle. Nie ma na to miejsca nawet.
Владимир К (2018-08-06 14:39:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4564192403 эти точки выглядят как мусор. зачем они?
mike140 (2018-08-06 15:15:19+00:00): Честно говоря, я сам в шоке! Не представляю как они появились и что означают
Владимир К (2018-08-08 06:46:07+00:00): удалил эти теги.
Vlad Aksonov (2016-12-20 21:30:53+00:00): Тут не вода а житлові будинки позначено
AgusQui (2016-12-31 04:06:07+00:00): Avenida Ramos Mejia no tiene acceso restrigido en la zona de paradas, si no conoce la zona no cambie tags de calles.
richlv (2016-12-20 23:30:13+00:00): hey, is operator "igors" correct here ? is that a detail static enough to be added to the public map dataset ?
user_4547543 (2016-12-20 21:58:42+00:00): Should Say: Actualizaciones en Argentina. Reconocimiento cartográfico 2016 por KG.
letihu (2017-01-14 22:09:24+00:00): Parkplatz mitten auf der Straße?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4564228300/history
mueschel (2018-04-09 13:01:55+00:00): Hi,
you added 4 nodes with the tag "traffic_sign:s" - this looks like a mistake. Could you check it? Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4564258644

Cheers, Jan
danieldegroot2 (2022-05-06 20:54:11+00:00): Resolved in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120646414

@mueschel seems like a simple typo to me (user unknowing how to tag multiple values), it's multiple values of traffic_sign. Looking at Wikipedia, these are 'valid'(be it now renamed) values for traffic signs:
- 231 / B5: "Give way." = Yield sign
- 863 / H23 "Two-way cycle path."
And, used in the right place, namely a bicycle crossing (only difference being a traffic island between the two flows of bicycle traffic).

Of course, the yield sign may apply to the cycleway and the traffic signs could be seperated and direction, support tag added to indicate they're facing different ways.

This user had been inactive for more than a year since you asked. You could check if their other edits look ok, but otherwise it may be better to try fixing such an issue yourself where you can.

Regards,

Daniel
SomeoneElse (2016-12-30 19:16:03+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2917982861 now has conflicting names - you'll need to use a proper editor (not MAPS.ME) to change it.  If it's a Byron Burger I'm guessing that the cuisine is no longer Spanish also?
eggie (2017-03-21 08:17:20+00:00): ....beter laat dan nooit....
 "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:10:00+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44404038, 44404200, 44404264, 44404772, 44404903, 44405144, 44405247, 44405371, 44405524, 44405691, 44406026, 44406354, 44406743, 44406819, 44406901, 44407266, 44407759, 44408027, 44408411, 44408548, 44408581, 44408655, 44408688, 44408732, 44408806, 44408893, 44409078, 44409132, 44409164, 44409193, 44409639, 44409751, 44409804, 44409977, 44409998, 44410072, 44410187, 44410250, 44410415, 44410452, 44412832, 44412848, 44412931, 44413012, 44413024, 44413103, 44413124, 44413184, 44413211, 44413260, 44413292, 44413347, 44413392.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:20:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553697 where the changeset comment is: reverting attempt at fixing things that actually made things worse (German: Verschlimmbesserung)
mueschel (2016-12-26 12:50:19+00:00): Hi, 
can you check this POI? It has 3 strange tags
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460833686

  Republiki = Francji
  note = some
  sources = report

Cheers, Jan
kocio (2016-12-28 02:25:01+00:00): Thanks, I'll fix it! This is JOSM copying bug, but I thought I have managed to avoid it...
freebeer (2019-01-10 14:14:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66197305 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me personal home castle in the middle of a road
Aleks-Berlin (2016-12-21 14:06:09+00:00): could you please fix the bad new key='source' including " ' ". all other keys in OSM dont use this style. It could also break some scripts.
mueschel (2016-12-26 14:15:55+00:00): Hi,
I found the tag 
"baliisi = {toistopiste=false, uunta=laskeva}" 
on four nodes - is this a mistake?

Cheers, Jan
BeKri (2016-12-21 07:55:39+00:00): Servus,
Das ist kein Update sondern eine doppelter Eintrag,
die Adresse steht schon lange in http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2505363895
entweder oder -> wieder raus
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:49:54+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2016-12-21 04:15:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавили на карту OpenStreetMap собственный дом в качестве гостевого дома с названием "мой дом". Ваши изменения отменены. Пожалуйста, не используйте OpenStreetMap как персональную карту. Используйте для своих персональных отметок "Метки" в приложении MAPS.ME.
calfarome (2017-02-13 15:35:51+00:00): Hi masa steel . May I know the reason why did you delete this building in this changeset?. 
See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44554948
kartler175 (2017-01-09 22:39:16+00:00): Please reconnect: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-114.17015&lat=51.03793&zoom=18&opacity=1.00&overlays=unconnected_major1
frosm (2021-01-06 00:28:33+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez renseigné ce bar comme étant au 192, mais il est positionné du côté des no impair. est-ce une erreur de position ou de no ?
Par ailleurs je m'étonne que le bar soie ouvert 24h/24 7j/7, ce n'est pas une erreur ?
Bonne continuation
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:50:24+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!