piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:31:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:55:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:56:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-07-01 20:08:47+00:00): Hi,

You can just drag the object to the new location. That is less work and keeps some history
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:12:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:35:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Pieter Vander Vennet (2018-07-01 20:11:09+00:00): Hey,

These points might have seemed empty, but they contained some address information. Please doublecheck the 'all tags' on the bottom if it is really empty
mavl (2018-12-24 23:30:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
dooley (2018-09-22 15:59:19+00:00): Hallo dennis_g_v.

Du hast mit diesem Änderungssatz PLZ-Grenzen geändert. Lt. meinen Informationen gehört die Straße "Im Schlehert" zur PLZ 76187, siehe auch die Adresse eines der dort ansässigen Unternehmen https://www.iavf.de/das-unternehmen/impressum/
Prüfst du bitte nochmal deine Änderungen?

Gruß, dooley
mosstreet (2018-06-30 20:40:01+00:00): Так не делается) читайте
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Общественный_транспорт
Вернул правильное название.
mosstreet (2018-06-30 20:59:20+00:00): Попросите trolleway, чтобы вам помог в примерах и потом сами уже начнете строить маршруты, если сами не осилите
Hjart (2018-06-30 17:44:29+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig at genkalde denne version og ændre så der ikke længere er angivet tandlæge
Jan Rou (2018-06-30 17:59:35+00:00): Ok
atcomapper (2018-06-30 15:18:45+00:00): Du har ikke fjernet noget, blot ændret navnet. Er her en tandlæge eller ej?
highflyer74 (2018-08-27 12:09:22+00:00): Hello Luiyo!

I noticed you are using fuel:cng=only to tag CNG stations that are solely used for CNG. Please note that the value =only is not used for fuel. All fuel:*=* has to be tagged =yes in order for software to recognize it. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel for details. Also check https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/fuel%3Acng#values for current statistics on this issue. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask :-)
Luiyo (2018-08-28 17:42:38+00:00): Mmmmm, you are right. I put "only" because I copied an existing station.
I did it in several places, I'll try to fix it.
highflyer74 (2018-08-30 06:27:29+00:00): Hola! Thank you for your reply. If you need help finding the stations, let me know. See you!
dgitto (2018-07-02 10:00:52+00:00): gli oggetti inseriti hanno il nome ma nessun tag che dica di cosa si tratti. (potrebbe essere un ascensore, un vaso di fiori, ecc)
controlla il wiki per trovare il tag giusto
dgitto (2018-07-02 10:04:17+00:00): vedi ad es.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station
mavl (2018-07-20 15:44:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:25:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:57:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:50:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:49:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:42:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Truchin (2018-07-02 08:16:33+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Baptiste

Faudrait demander à la communauté de ce qu'elle pense de ce tramway sur pneu qui d'un point de vu du code de la route est un bus guidé avant de modifier les tags....

Thomas
Jean-Baptiste Staebler (2018-07-02 11:55:15+00:00): Non, du point de vue du code de la route c'est un tramway.
Truchin (2018-07-02 12:57:05+00:00): C'était un vieux souvenir (notamment sur le fait que le véhicule doit respecter les dimensions routières) - même s'il est appelé abusivement tramway
En pratique, le wiki est assez clair, ce type de transport qui n'est pas un transport sur rail doit être tagué par highway=bus_guideway.
Si tu penses que c'est une erreur, n'hésite pas à contacter la communauté pour que le wiki soit modifié.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway
Jean-Baptiste Staebler (2018-07-02 13:09:23+00:00): Non, le wiki est clair : bus_guidway est réservé aux bus guidés. Or le Translohr n'est pas un bus ! C'est au sens de la loi un tramway, même s'il repose sur des pneus. D'ailleurs, il est entièrement dépendant de son infrastructure, n'est pas immatriculé et n'est pas concerné par la limite de longueur imposée aux véhicules routiers. 
Je crois que tu confonds le Translohr avec le TVR (comme à Nancy et autrefois à Caen) qui est un bus guidé.
Truchin (2018-07-02 14:21:10+00:00): Comme c'est tout sauf évident, il faudrait demander l'avis de la communauté pour éviter les guerres d'édition.
Peux tu justifier tes différentes affirmations ?
Jean-Baptiste Staebler (2018-07-02 15:01:38+00:00): Voici une réponse officielle : http://www.strmtg.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/differents-types-de-tramway-r65.html
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:44:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:46:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:36:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:44:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Nakaner (2018-07-01 12:12:45+00:00): Hi DrBecca,

is Olivia's Café really located in the church? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5730152021

Please keep in mind that the Wheelmap app is known to have bugs which move points of interest you added to wrong location because it reuses the last known location of your device. That's why it is recommended to use the online editor at www.openstreetmap.org instead. Changes there will appear on the Wheelmap within a few minutes.

You received this comment because Wheelmap shares all changes with OpenStreetMap. You can answer this comment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60299641 after logging in with your OSM account (you need one to add new features to Wheelmap).

Best regards and happy mapping

Michael
DrBecca (2018-07-02 08:07:14+00:00): Yes, an independent cafe is now present in what was the church community centre area.
xeen (2018-07-01 09:35:15+00:00): Moin, sehe ich das richtig, das Du aus Versehen den extra Radweg zwischen Grubenstieg/Rugenbarg entfernt hast, weil er auf den Satbildern nicht zu sehen ist? Ich meine diese Stelle:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60299898#map=19/53.58230/9.85839

Die Satbilder sind nicht aktuell, denn den Weg gibt es wirklich (ich war da). Ich habe leider keine direkten Bilder, aber durch andere Aufnahmen sieht man ihn.
Von der Straße aus: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/breunigs?lat=53.581893442902896&lng=9.857948591677086&z=16.45449223005459&pKey=9wbzoKRej1Wmv7yjc7UaXg&focus=photo&x=0.5105380796331634&y=0.5337017199806983&zoom=0
Vom Grubenstieg aus: https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/breunigs?lat=53.58179014646782&lng=9.858791911983731&z=17&pKey=4ZPPEqL4RFPNVZq8Tnam7w&focus=photo
Beide Bilder sind weniger als einen Monat alt.

Ich füge den bei Gelegenheit wieder hinzu. In Zukunft aber bitte wenigstens mit Mapillary o.ä. gegenchecken. Gerade Radwege werden momentan überall ausgebaut, sodass die Satbilder sehr schnell veralten. 

Danke!
ma-rt-in (2018-07-01 10:03:00+00:00): Hallo,
ja auf den bildern war das sehr undeutlich zu erkennen. Habe es wieder angepasst. Nur wird der Radweg ernsthaft immer über die Straße ausgeschildert oder doch über die Radwege ander Seite?
xeen (2018-07-01 13:19:08+00:00): 👍. Der Radweg ist auf beiden Seiten als "track" vorhanden, manchmal mit Grünstreifen dazwischen, manchmal straßenbegleitend. Stadteinwärts wird der Track kurz vor der Kreuzung (etwas vor Einmündung Brandstücken) ein "shared_lane", der zwischen Links/Rechtsabbiegerspur geführt wird.

Auf der gesamten Länge der Bornheide sind die Radwege nicht benutzungspflichtig. Da es eine ordentliche Beschilderung erst 2020 geben wird, ist die offizielle Führung etwas offen. Der abgetrennte Radweg wird aber definitiv suggeriert. Ich weiß gerade nicht mehr, warum ich das damals bei der Veloroute 1 anders eingetragen hatte…

Wie dem auch sei, ich habe neue Bilder gemacht die in 1-2 Tagen auf Mapillary auftauchen sollten. Damit sollten auch die kleinen Details hoffentlich klar werden :)
rainerU (2018-07-11 12:28:21+00:00): L'Intermarché existait déjà dans Openstreetmap. J'ai donc supprimé le doublon que tu as crée.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60300581
mavl (2018-07-20 13:45:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
rainerU (2018-07-11 12:30:42+00:00): Tu as crée une attraction sans préciser de quoi il s'agit. Peux tu ajouter plus d'information, par exemple le nom de cette attraction?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60300736
mavl (2018-07-20 13:59:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:46:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:52:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:31:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-06-30 15:27:45+00:00): Hello, I noticed that you are currently using Bing imagery for Bamako... Please consider using ESRI World imagery as it is more recent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60301108
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-06-30 15:27:39+00:00): Hello, I noticed that you are currently using Bing imagery for Bamako... Please consider using ESRI World imagery as it is more recent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60301127
mavl (2018-12-24 23:50:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:18:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:37:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:13:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:29:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Jean-Marc Liotier (2018-06-30 15:27:16+00:00): Hello, I noticed that you are currently using Bing imagery for Bamako... Please consider using ESRI World imagery as it is more recent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60301779