piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ShadowFoxNixill (2020-02-15 20:20:44+00:00): Turnarounds should not have segregated leading ways, as those are lanes on the main road which are neither physically nor legally segregated. Additionally, this changeset created a gap in northbound route 125 relations.
ShadowFoxNixill (2020-02-15 20:22:42+00:00): (Regarding legality: A single white solid line is legal, though not recommended, to cross. A legal prohibition is supposed to be marked with a double white solid line.)
viloan (2019-12-16 16:11:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
dvdhoven (2019-12-16 17:38:37+00:00): Knooppunt 43-46 was stuk door deze actie. Die heb ik hersteld.
GPX Speedtag (2019-12-16 19:34:38+00:00): Die heeft er ook niet opgestaan zoals die nu staat.
Ik denk niet dat dit door mijn actie komt.
dvdhoven (2019-12-16 19:48:33+00:00): Dat komt wel degelijk door jouw actie.
Je hebt de weg op 2 plekken doorgeknipt en daarbij is een deel van 3 wegstukken omgedraaid. Dat komt nl vaak voor bij doorknippen en zeker als het op 2 plekken tegelijk gebeurt.

Er is een controletool voor het knooppuntnetwerk en die geeft precies aan bij welke wijzigingsset welke fout optreedt.
Daar kan echt niemand zich meer onderuit kletsen al ga je op je kop staan.
GPX Speedtag (2019-12-17 03:12:28+00:00): Dan komt het wel door die actie maar dan blijft het vreemd dat die relatie dan niet getoond wordt in iD.
Ik neem mijn beeld op en kan terugkijken wat ik gedaan heb. 
In iD stond er niet Fietsroute rcn 43-46 maar enkel Fietsroute zonder rcn 43-46 erachter. 

Ik heb de weg wel bewerkt, dat ontken ik ook niet, maar aan die relaties ben ik niet aan geweest en die stonden ook niet zo.

Dan heb ik in iD dus ook niet goed kunnen doen als die relaties zo niet getoond worden.
user_5359 (2019-12-19 19:21:54+00:00): Hello! What ist the meaning of the tag "330816891=dhoni007" on node https://www.osm.org/node/330816857 ?
deepthi1 (2019-12-20 01:15:49+00:00): Hi user_5359,

Thanks for flagging the error.
By mistakenly, placed the incorrect value on the node.

Made the necessary changes.

Thanks,
deepthi1
jumbanho (2019-12-17 13:20:16+00:00): I just wanted to say thanks for all your edits in Durham Co.
vogelfreier (2019-12-17 15:44:26+00:00): I could do more than just check roads and capture a few buildings with Mapbox aerial photos - if there weren't all these residential areas with names and cauliflower-like natural forest in between. And also these parks, which are partly provided with addresses ...
eggie (2019-12-16 16:55:00+00:00): Hi Jappie.. welcome to osm and thanks for contribution.
I removed your restarea.. No rest-area here and merged your shop info with the present adressnode
gr eggie.
marczoutendijk (2020-01-02 11:21:32+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79110419

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
PT-53 (2019-12-17 08:38:15+00:00): Hallo  thesurveyor,
auch bei dieser Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108819077/history
sind unnötige Access-Markmale (foot + bicycle=yes) eingetragen.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-01-06 10:59:20+00:00): erledigt
marczoutendijk (2019-12-23 09:31:40+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78765212

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
luisforte (2019-12-16 18:47:20+00:00): Boa tarde,
Existe necessidade de criar tantos utilizadores com o nome *LFIP* para tão poucas edições? 
Luis
ViriatoLusitano (2019-12-18 19:45:15+00:00): São alunos do colégio luso-francês.
milet (2020-01-03 11:22:34+00:00): Hallo,

zwei kurze Anmerkungen zu deinen Änderungen:

1) Den Rathsberg-Gipfel gibt es bereits hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1456150286 (diese Position erscheint mir auch richtiger, wenn man sich an den Höhenlinien einer topographischen Karte orientiert).

2) Den Funkmast hätte ich als "man_made=mast" gelassen. Das Bauwerk hier entspricht doch recht gut der Wiki-Beschreibung für einen Mast + Lattice-Bauweise.
jojopi (2020-01-06 15:08:30+00:00): Hallo milet,

vielen Dank für Deine Kritik. Den Funkmast habe ich wieder in "man_made=mast" geändert. Da hatte ich beim Ändern nicht aufgepasst.
Den gipfel habe ich anhand folgender Karte ermittelt: ISBN 3-87388-031-8. Aber ich werde meine Entscheidung bei Gelegenheit anhand der amtlichen Karten überprüfen.
Carto'Cité (2020-01-02 17:19:04+00:00): Bonjour.
Pour info il est préférable de modifier les éléments plutôt que les remplacer, par respect pour les contributeurs précédents et afin de conserver l'historique des données. 
J'ai rétabli les tags surface et bicycle sur certains chemins : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79123372

Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
estonino (2019-12-16 17:06:44+00:00): That is not a road, needs to be corrected
Frans S (2020-01-07 10:46:25+00:00): Hello Egaloitaet. Thanks for mapping here
I review mappers work before validating.
Sorry to say, but your mappings are not as expected and subject for improvement. Not accurate mapped and squared.
You mapped 26 buildings here and none have been squared. Please square all buildings with the Q key in iDeditor.
in 1 occasion you collected an area ( indeed, not that clear) and called it 1 building. When you map an area, do not cross buildings with the lines, 
Best regards and keep mapping
GeorgeKaplan (2019-12-19 10:01:32+00:00): Bonjour,
Bienvenue sur OSM. Je viens de voir votre ajout de numéros d'adresse Rue de la Meije. Tel quel, c'est incomplet, il faut rajouter pour chacun des numéros la rue avec le champ "addr:street"  qui est égal au nom de la voie : Rue de la Meije
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78484569
'Tonin (2019-12-20 13:46:57+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour l’accueil ^^
Pour ajouter les adresses dans cette rue, j’ai utilisé la relation associatedStreet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10418206). Je ne pensais pas que le tag "addr:street=*" était nécessaire dans ce cas. Je me suis inspiré d’un autre exemple pas loin, la rue Wagram (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8779289), pour laquelle le nom de la rue est seulement renseigné sur la route et dans la relation.
En navigant sur le wiki, j’ai cependant cru comprendre que la communauté était assez divisée sur l’utilisation de cette relation (par rapport à "addr:street=*" ou la relation "street")…
Bref, pensez-vous que je dois ajouter les tag "addr:street=*" malgré la relation"associatedStreet" ?
GeorgeKaplan (2019-12-20 13:53:51+00:00): Bonjour,

Non, pas de problème, vous avez bien fait. C'est ma faute : je suis allé trop vite et je n'ai pas regardé s'il existait une relation.
trial (2019-12-20 23:10:27+00:00): Si il y a un problème^^ : un point adresse doit représenter une adresse et une seule
addr:housenumber=1D1;1D2 représente 2 adresses. D'où l'intérêt de ne pas mettre l'adresse sur le building mais sur un point de la façade (il y a d'autres variantes comme au droit de la rue).
Normalement 
http://dev.cadastre.openstreetmap.fr/fantoir/index.html#insee=38085&tab=1
aurait dû permettre de créer cette relation mais ici le cadastre semble à la peine.
Donc déjà vous faites mieux (chapeau pour une première contribution).
je suggère que vous mettiez les deux adresses sur deux points distincts du bâti comme ça on sait quelle maison a quelle adresse.
'Tonin (2019-12-22 22:18:45+00:00): Bonsoir,
Merci pour vos retours.
J’ai déplacé les numéros d’adresse sur les façades des maisons pour les adresses en 1XX : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78745480
trial, cela correspond-il à ce qui est attendu ?
trial (2019-12-22 22:30:10+00:00): Oui, c'est parfait !
Merci. Ne pas hésiter à venir sur la liste de diffusion [talk-fr], http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/France-f5380434.html ou l'on parle de l'intégration des adresse via Bano V2.
'Tonin (2019-12-22 22:42:56+00:00): Ok, merci beaucoup ^^
RoterEmil (2019-12-16 17:48:15+00:00): Hi, die Gustav-Heinemann-Oberschule ist schon seit 11 Jahren in OSM eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25310181 . Deinen Eintrag habe ich wieder gelöscht. Bitte vorher schauen, was schon in OSM vorhanden ist :) (vielleicht ist es auch ein weiteres maps.me-Problem). Schöne Grüße
Frans S (2020-01-02 11:33:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
Please map more accurate and square the buildings you map every time with the Q key on iDeditor
Restrict yourself also to the mapping requirements on these tasks.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-01-02 13:39:09+00:00): Another issue.
Please try to read a imagery more careful.
You mapped a number of buildings which are actual pieces of a highway visible between trees. Try to understand where you are looking to .
Best regards
Frans S (2020-01-06 11:23:15+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I review tasks before validating.
A few remarks.
Please be more accurate with mapping and following the outlines of buildings.
Also square all the buildings you map with the Q key in IDeditor.
Please pay also attention on the issues visible on the triangle on the right hand menu and try to solve them before uploading.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-01-06 11:27:54+00:00): Another issue. 
Highway tag track is used for access to farmland and so on. In hamlets and villages Path, unclassified and residential are common used. I corrected them
Please review the wiki page about tagging highways
Thanks
ndm (2019-12-18 00:06:21+00:00): ESRI imagery seems to show the removed section clearly.
Maxar premium seems to have trees obscuring the path.
Irrespective there must be some access to garages/sheds at end of the gardens.
theArchDruid (2019-12-18 14:47:23+00:00): I've added a track road where I removed the section of service road. You're correct, there does appear to be access to some facilities beyond Francis Road. However, I don't believe it is apt to call it a service road. Hopefully this settles the issue. Thanks for the help.
marczoutendijk (2020-01-02 11:26:12+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79110561


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Carto'Cité (2020-01-02 14:12:43+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces ajustements.
Je me pose toutefois une question : est-ce que la voie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109475671 est autorisée (bicycle=yes) ou tolérée (bicycle=permissive) aux cyclistes (idem pour les piétons) ? Cela permettrait une liaison douce entre la rue des Plantes et la rue Jules Vallès...
Cordialement,
Antoine de Carto’Cité, projet #CartoVeloIDF
elfronto (2020-01-03 21:48:00+00:00): Bonjour, cette voie fait partie d'une propriété explicitement marquée comme étant privée. Il y a une petite entrée donnant sur le parc qui n'est utilisée que par les résidents de la résidence.
Cordialement.
Carto'Cité (2020-01-06 08:38:59+00:00): Ok merci :-)
Frans S (2020-01-08 15:27:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I review mappings and validate tasks
A remark. Please square all buildings you map with the Q key in iDeditor,
Best regards and keep mapping
viloan (2019-12-16 17:42:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Skippern (2019-12-18 00:13:31+00:00): Por favor não muda natural=coastline sem intender como esse tag funciona
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78486081
DeBigC (2021-08-11 11:12:54+00:00): Hiya
When a building is higher than 3 levels  and there is a skillion roof (a tilt to one side) the sat image is messing with your eyes and makes the building crooked. I have been on-site here and the building is completely orthogonal. Also, we ought to try drawing a building where it arises from the ground, rather than be drawn to the roof position, which again is very tempting. Well done on getting a few of these starting. I am putting addresses on them and ground truthing them as best as I can. Feel free to review.
Truchin (2019-12-17 20:47:53+00:00): Ici, chemin n'est probablement pas le nom du chemin. C'est une description de l'élément (qui est en théorie contenue dans le Tag highway=track)
viloan (2019-12-16 17:47:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
praeteritum (2023-08-09 07:34:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139644373.
Frans S (2020-01-03 11:27:48+00:00): Hello John. Thanks for mapping on this project. You left a lot of correction work to other mappers/validators.
You did not square the majority of your buildings with the Q key in iDeditor.
Please do not connect nodes of buildings to other buildings or features
and be more accurate in following the outlines of buildings. You often map a building oversized,
This is a building/highway project. Please restrict yourself to that, rather than mapping farmland. ( these areas have to be mapped out of a project because in these project you are limited to the task were your are working on and it is beyond the scope of the project
Best regards and keep mapping
karson_ (2020-06-21 00:05:32+00:00): Is the Trashmore Trail really for racing? Or is it just a regular bike trail?
Marek-M (2020-06-30 11:02:03+00:00): Cześć, widzę, że dodałeś trochę ścieżek w lesie https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7128130 - dzięki, takie dane zawsze są przydatne. Jednak jako początkujący mapper popełniłeś kilka błędów, któe wpadły mi w oko oraz znalazł je Validator w JOSM.

* Część dróg miałeś nie podłączonych do innych dróg
* Połączyłeś drogi z obszarami (np. połączyłeś drogę z granicą lasu) - nie jest to zabronione ale mocno utrudnia późniejsze edycje dróg i obszarów, które są ze sobą połączone. Błędne w 100% jest kończenie drogi na granicy obszaru np. lasu.
1* Połączyłeś drogi z granicą administracyjną (boundary=administrative)
2* Utworzyłeś w lesie footway zamiast path - path domyślnie daje zezwolenie na poruszanie się po ścieżkach rowerom, pieszym i konno. Jak gdzieś jest znak zakazu wjazdu konno, to wystarczy dodać horse=no a tagi foot i bicycle są wtedy zbędne.
3* Dodałeś nazwy ścieżkom w lesie, które podejrzewam, że nie występują w terenie. Chyba, że się mylę i jest to pierwszy las, w którym ścieżki piesze są ponazywane.

Ostatniego punktu nie poprawiałem, bo być może te nazwy w tym lesie znajdują się na ścieżkach. Jeśli ich nie ma, to albo proszę Ciebie o usunięcie ich z dróg, lub daj znać, to Ci w tym pomogę.

Pozdrawiam.
dx125 (2019-12-20 07:43:34+00:00): Hi itchybellybutton,
new in the former beverage market, Warschauer Straße, in BRB-Hohenstücken, behind Shell petrol station
https://www.maz-online.de/Lokales/Brandenburg-Havel/Tafel-in-Brandenburg-an-der-Havel-oeffnet-an-neuem-Standort
https://meetingpoint-brandenburg.de/neuigkeiten/artikel/59286-Die_Tafel_muss_umziehen_Unterstuetzer_gesucht
itchybellybutton (2019-12-22 13:37:36+00:00): Hey dx125. Yes, you are right. I moved the point, but it won't disappear at the old location. Is there something I'm missing? Or just a issue with OSM?

And Happy Holidays :)
dx125 (2019-12-22 19:05:03+00:00): Everything OK.
The OSM standard map sometimes takes a little longer to apply the changes,
This special map is faster:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.40027/12.55222&layers=H

... and Merry Christmas!
viloan (2019-12-16 18:13:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
JandaM (2019-12-17 08:22:07+00:00): Dobry den,
  prosim prejmenujte se na ROZBIJECe. Mel by jste vedet, ze mapove podklady od BINGu nesedi a hlavne se nedaji zarovnat aby byly pouzitelne. Je to pomsta do M$. Prosim prestatne nicit budovy ktere jsou pretrasovane z RUIAN.
  Dekuji M
mapman44 (2019-12-18 03:39:03+00:00): In this changeset that you worked on, there is an untagged line along Southwest Riverwood Drive. Please check it and tag it appropriately. Thanks.
mapman44 (2019-12-18 03:41:16+00:00): Also there is an untagged line along Southwest Peach Cove Road. Please fix that one also. Thanks.
mapman44 (2019-12-18 03:44:00+00:00): Two more, along Southwest Riverwood Drive and along Southwest Forest Cove Road. Thanks.
MissingCSAA (2019-12-18 17:47:35+00:00): Yes. A lot of these I left for future mapping.
mapman44 (2019-12-18 17:50:14+00:00): I'm not sure what you mean by "future mapping." Please explain, Thanks.
MissingCSAA (2019-12-18 17:51:27+00:00): Areas where I had planned to come back and do more refinements, but wanted to keep the existing wireframe of the paralleled line in place until I got there. Thanks

You are welcome to delete those if you see them in the future though
mapman44 (2019-12-18 17:53:07+00:00): Thanks. They just show as validation errors with no explanation.
ma-rt-in (2019-12-17 09:56:16+00:00): Hallo,
ich hab deine neue Buslinie mal etwas angepasst.
vg
ma-rt-in (2019-12-17 20:38:27+00:00): Ah noch was, kommen zu den pt=stop_position noch i-wann die pt=platform?
vg
user_507893 (2019-12-18 12:09:06+00:00): Nein, das vertraue ich den PT-Fachkräften an
安格拉 (2019-12-22 20:13:44+00:00): --Why are you not using changeset comments?
Frans S (2020-01-02 13:38:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
This is a building/ highway task. Please stick to that. It makes no sense to map parts as "wood" since those areas are much bigger than the task square you mapped. These taggings have to be done outside the tasking manager. 
The way you map these woods introduces lots of errors which have to be solved as well,
Best regards and keep mapping
luisforte (2019-12-16 19:10:11+00:00): Boa tarde, 
Existe necessidade de criar tantos utilizadores com o nome *LFIP* para tão poucas edições? 
Luis
feta2 (2020-04-30 18:21:01+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz,
I noticed you added junction:ref= NT405 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158584374, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158584309, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158584377, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524742248. Based on the Key:junction:ref wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:junction:ref that tag combination should be used for exit numbers. Is there a reason you decided to use this tag? I also noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6705213952 has the ref=NT405 information on it and was curious what it refers to?

Thanks,
feta2
Kovoschiz (2020-05-01 11:11:47+00:00): First of all, I think there's some issues with the Wiki. It is a "in use" key only, and the associated proposal is only in draft stage and is very old. 
If you compare definitions, you will see there are some inconsistencies. "junction" itsel refers to a junction, nothing more (see `junction=`). `highway=motorway_junction` is a historic mistake of referring to exits (UK conveniently mixes up "motorway junction" and exit numbers), and this is apparently what the `junction:ref=` page is referring to. Furthermore, when you look at the page, it mentioned `destination=`, however "junction" and "destination" are really different concepts. No one really knows how the page's author comes to the conclusion, despite >20k uses of `junction:ref=`.
In Hong Kong, signalized junctions and crosswalks are numbered on the ground by the set of traffic signal system. Someone took the time to add them. Since them, at least there are some attempts to incorporate them properly (the standalone `note=highway=traffic_signals` or unchanged `highway=traffic_signals` nodes. Recently, I'm settling towards using `traffic_signal:ref=` instead of `junction:ref=`, so they should be changed in the future. 
Anyway, no one really uses exit numbers much in HK. They are purely a systematic construct for the sake of it. You will notice interchange and roundabout names, as well as street names at times, are pretty inconsistent.
Kovoschiz (2020-05-01 11:16:15+00:00): (You will see J-numbers being used to refer to the entire interchange in the UK. Exit numbers are meaningless to use in this respect, and they don't cover entrances and entry-only connector roads.)