piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Branko Kokanovic (2017-11-13 23:10:21+00:00): So, in reference you are mentioning, I was adding name:sr-Latn which is not allowed outside of Serbia (and doesn't make sense). In this changeset, I was just adding local names (same as other languages are doing, and especially troublesome for non-native readers of Japanese, even when we follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Avoid_transliteration). This is *not* bot doing it, this is person doing this, using Sophox for help, here is reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Serbia/Sophox (pointers to discussion where other person was asking about it). So, to conclude - 1) these are not mechanical edits, 2) this are not some kind of edit types that are new to OSM, 3) I am not running Sophox as a tool, but as a helper for mapping manually, 4) I gave references. Hope this makes sense
Nakaner (2017-11-13 23:16:44+00:00): Hi Branko,

that someone else has done something bad is not a justification for you to do the same bad thing.

It is not troublesome for people who cannot read Japanese because data users can use transliteration libraries. The German OSM Carto style is a great example.

What are the sources of your changeset?

Best regards

Michael

PS I have not asked the DWG to do anything.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-11-22 16:46:08+00:00): Kolego, dodawania numeru domu do granicy parafii jest, delikatnie mówiąc, mocno nieprzemyślane.
Carnildo (2017-11-14 07:37:12+00:00): I've deleted this and your other edits.  Please don't map things that don't actually have a physical presence.
eggie (2017-11-14 16:28:17+00:00): Oke... nuttige aanvulling. Tip: Als achtergrond kun je het beste de luchtfoto kadaster pdok (2016) vertrouwen . De Bing is soms actueler, maar ligt verschoven van de werkelijkheid en niet zo'n beetje ook. Dat is een probleem op zich(t).
eggie (2017-11-14 16:59:02+00:00): Feedback: Via PB contact gehad.
GinaroZ (2017-11-13 22:50:05+00:00): Bonjour. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1162809 est un bâtiment démoli, donc ne devrait pas avoir une étiquette de construction.
Markus366 (2017-11-14 19:08:34+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei osm und danke für deine Arbeiten.

Eine Bitte: Könntest du deine Änderungen mit etwas aussagekräftigeren Kommentaren versehen?! "Ortskenntnis-Änderungen" und "Ortskenntnis-Änderungen" sagen anderen mappern wenig darüber, was und warum du etwas editiert hast.

Markus
muralito (2017-11-14 11:33:06+00:00): Need help?
dudka (2017-11-14 08:21:33+00:00): окремі полоси не потрібно позначати окремими лініями
GerdP (2017-11-14 08:22:07+00:00): Hi!
I've changed highway=crossing to highway=footway + footway=crossing here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540282359
I've also changed the nodes from highway=traffic_signals to highway=crossing. Please review.
Raulvior (2017-11-14 14:08:16+00:00): Hello,
The crossing still has the value "traffic_signals" of the key "highway". Anyways, the crossing has both traffic signals for people and for cars and tram. I have made a new changeset adding "button_operated=yes" to the road semaphores. I forgot to add that. Link to changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53772679
smaprs (2017-11-14 01:21:40+00:00): John, suas contribuições são boas, mas
por favor, é prática do OSM evitar deletar pra simplesmente refazer. Deve-se reaproveitar as edições de outros sempre que seja viável. Por favor, entre em contato. Também em:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53378975
rmikke (2017-11-17 14:02:13+00:00): Hej,

Tak na przyszłość, to dobrze by było, żeby linia w Warszawie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540285356 była w osobnym changesecie, niż "Łódź - obszar zabudowy" :)
user_5359 (2017-11-14 18:14:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have reverted your change set because your business has only one house number, the building four. Please notice also the housenumber 51 in another building https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3825447571 . and use shop=beauty for describing your business.
Constable (2018-02-09 21:41:27+00:00): what's that garbage that you added as a name tag value?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540292517
I'm removing it
swimdb (2018-02-09 21:50:31+00:00): I am guessing that was a fatfinger cut and paste, thanks for fixing it.
Constable (2018-02-10 18:08:32+00:00): you're welcome, thanks for your reply!
cheers
5m4u9 (2017-11-14 14:29:41+00:00): hola, este nombre "Pedro y Nelida", es porque hay dos personas así con ése nombre? o es su nombre propio del lugar?
//
lindo ver que haya mapeos de estos lugares, alguna vez quise comenzar a mapear estos lugares luego de leer unos trabajos de investigación de estos sitios y las lagunas...
Agustin (2017-11-15 02:25:02+00:00): Hay costumbre de que los geoglifos una vez que han sido visitados y reportados al IPHAN se les da el nombre de la "Fazenda" en la que están. Este está en reserva natunal Chico Mendés pero al lado de la casa de Pedro y Néliida, me pareció apropiado llamarlo así. La tendencia es a poner sólo el nombre del varón pero creo que es bueno reflejar que también hay mujeres en el mundo.
datamongers (2017-11-27 20:51:04+00:00): Hello, Im curious as to why you deleted the "West Yellowstone Economic Development Council", i drove by a couple days ago, and the sign is still on the building. Do you have a source on it being closed?
datamongers (2017-12-01 12:29:24+00:00): Based on your lack of response, im assuming that this node was deleted by mistake and am re-adding it.
smaprs (2017-11-14 11:09:06+00:00): John, por favor entre em contato com a comunidade. Evite deletar para refazer. Veja comentários nos seus changesets.
smaprs (2017-11-15 01:55:00+00:00): Veja, você deletou uma rua mapeada há anos, para mapear igual no mesmo lugar. Apesar de você adicionar mais dados, está "errado" deletar o que já existia. Nestes caso, o "correto" é acrescentar os dados que faltem e corrigir traçado se necessário.  
Veja em:  
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=53756674  
Histórico:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128652791/history  
E responda os contatos, por favor, faz parte da etiqueta do OSM.
Nakaner (2017-11-14 16:29:41+00:00): Hi Nickelodeous,

back in September Vivek asked on the Imports mailing list for a community review of the San Jose Sidwalk Import (see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-September/005160.html). Other users responded there that if the import adds new sidwalks, they must be properly connected to the street network in this area. On 2017-10-20 I asked to add these connections (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-October/005206.html). On Tuesday last week I repeated this request a SECOND time (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-November/005233.html). Andy Townsend from the OSMF Data Working Group repeated this request today (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/2017-November/005246.html).

You still continue to upload even more erroneous data as though nothing had happened instead of fixing the data which has already been upload to OSM and waits to be fixed. 

That's why I ask you again to pause your import until the erroneous data is not erroneous any more.

In addition, please use a dedicated account for any future changeset which is part of an import. The Import Guidelines require you to do so. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Best regards

Michael
Chetan_Gowda (2017-11-16 07:14:23+00:00): Hi,
The carpool lanes have been added to the same motorway with tags hov=designated and hov=lane, we don't need to redraw specifically new roads. 

Chetan
nevw (2017-11-14 12:11:12+00:00): Hi
please zoom in much closer when doing this type of editing as you have crossing building lines, building connected to part of parkland and two separate buildings joined together. You can what went astray if you zoom in close on this page
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53757712
Didz (2017-11-23 15:00:40+00:00): Great to see you contributed, hope to see more fellow local.
mavl (2018-08-15 16:19:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет несуществующий автовокзал. Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены.
manog_nya (2019-05-22 08:00:11+00:00):     Hi Adityo,

                                  Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across way 
"way 285471848
way 685167451"
 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,  area seems to be  'Secondary'.
Please look into this and share your observations
Thanks in Advance.
bhavyakota (2019-04-29 09:09:14+00:00): Hi endang_p,

Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way 540325840
way 540325841
way 540325842
way 540326624
way 540326625
way 540326623
way 540326626
way 540326627
way 540325844
way 540326630
way 540325843
way 540325108
way 540327190
way 540326622
 classified as """"un-classified"""". However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
 As of now making necessary changes, Please revert if it is otherwise.

                                                                                        Thanks in Advance"""
BCNorwich (2017-11-14 07:43:10+00:00): Hi, no disrespect meant but as it is on the side of the road folk have to investigate further to find out exactly how to get to the company. If you place the POI within the outline of the building that houses it folk will know exactly where to go, this is the usual practice for OSM. 
Regards Bernard
smaprs (2017-11-14 11:15:25+00:00): Bem-vinda. Não é trunk esta via. Estava correta a classificação anterior. Restauradas classificações em:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53768157
bhavyakota (2019-04-29 06:54:10+00:00):                                                                                  "Hi endang_p,
 Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way 540328616
way 540328347
way 540328346
way 540328344
way 540327186
way 540327187
way 540328617
way 540328618
way 540327189
way 540327188
way 540327185
   
   classified as ""un-classified"". However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
 As of now making necessary changes, Please revert if it is otherwise.

                                                                                        Thanks in Advance"
metapieman (2017-11-14 04:49:32+00:00): The description here is incorrect. Should read 'Added Petrarca restaurant'.
Davie Dean (2017-11-15 00:51:23+00:00): Can you please add a description of what you've changed to your changesets in future?
vam_002 (2019-04-23 08:44:03+00:00): Hi endang_p,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
"way 540343219
way 540335818
way 540335819" classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance.
FrankXF (2017-11-16 00:00:24+00:00): Die Wendeschleife wurde entfernt. Hier ist zur Zeit ein großes Loch.
icsslive (2017-11-16 05:36:37+00:00): Das mag auch zur Zeit so sein. Die Gleise kommen aber wieder und werden auch gebraucht. Daher sollten diese nicht einfach gelöscht werden, sondern als Bauphase gekennzeichnet werden. Löschen ist hier der falsche Weg. Für zukünftige Planungen benötigen wir die Schleife.
Nakaner (2017-11-16 10:14:45+00:00): Hallo ds_rheinbahn,

welchen Sinn hat denn bitte diese Routenrelation? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7732516

Kannst du das rail_way=light_rail bitte wieder löschen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540337422/history Sonst stürzt sich da nur ein ortsunkundiger Weltverbesserer drauf, der meint, falsch geschriebene Tags "korrigieren" zu müssen.

Für künftige Fälle empfehle ich übrigens, noch bei stillgelegten und in Bau befindlichen Gleisen zu taggen, was es denn im "normalen" Zustand wäre. railway=disused allein unterscheidet nämlich nicht zwischen Voll-, Straßen-, Schmalspur- und U-Bahn. Deshalb verwenden wir mehr und mehr disused:railway=light_rail, construction:railway=light_rail. Siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Ob Mentz Lebenszyklus-Präfixe im Routing und Rendering auswertet, weiß ich nicht. Aber eine überlegenswerte Idee wäre es, weil man dann schon ein paar Wochen vor der Inbetriebnahme so tun könnte, als wäre die Infrastruktur in Betrieb.

Viele Grüße

Michael
icsslive (2017-11-16 12:59:53+00:00): Hallo Michael,

Danke für die Info. Die Schleife ist jetzt entsprechend getaggt. Mit Mentz habe ich gesprochen. Es wird versucht, den Import so anzupassen, dass ich auch vor der Inbetriebnahme schon routen kann.

Viele Grüße
Dieter
FrankXF (2017-11-17 22:09:10+00:00): "Löschen ist hier der falsche Weg" Da diese Information nicht bekannt ist (außer vielleicht bei der Rheinbahn), finde ich es schon gerechtfertigt. Besonders wenn man folgendes liest, dann ist es kaum wahrscheinlich, das die Wendeschleife wieder aufgebaut wird:
http://www.duesseldorfer-anzeiger.de/stadtteile/west/rheinbahn-verkauft-wendeschleifen-grundstueck-an-der-hansaallee-aid-1.5645809
FrankXF (2017-11-17 22:09:51+00:00): "Nach dem Bebauungsplan kann hier ein Gebäude mit fünf Vollgeschossen errichtet werden."
icsslive (2017-11-18 15:37:32+00:00): Hallo Frank,
da hast du den Artikel leider nicht genau gelesen. Der folgende Abschnitt in dem Artikel lautet:
"Es hat insgesamt eine Fläche von 3.400 Quadratmetern und bietet im Inneren auf rund 2.000 Quadratmetern Platz für eine Bebauung. Die Gleisschleife bleibt dauerhaft erhalten."
Wichtig ist der letzte Satz.
Gebaut wird dort ein Hotel. Die Bahn wird nach Fertigstellung um das Gebäude fahren.

Viele Grüße
Dieter
FrankXF (2017-11-26 19:22:47+00:00): Hallo Dieter,
das hatte ich übersehen. Werde besser die Lebenszyklus-Präfixe nutzen.
Was ist mit der Relation Relation Wendeschleife (7732516) und der Platform http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540337421. Die Relation ist m.E. nicht notwendig und könnte gelöscht werden. Bei der Platform finde ich auch ein contruction:railway=platform besser, die wird im Moment nämlich gerendert, obwohl sie nicht da ist.
Das Loch ist jetzt wieder gefüllt, sonst ist hier noch nichts gebaut.
icsslive (2017-11-27 06:53:11+00:00): Hallo Frank,

die Relation kannst du löschen. Bis die Schleife wieder in Betrieb geht, dauert es noch etwas.

Beste Grüße
Dieter
user_5359 (2017-11-14 17:45:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
marczoutendijk (2017-11-15 09:50:03+00:00): I have reverted this changeset because you destroyed some streets in Amsterdam (Kloveniersburgwal).
literan (2017-11-15 08:26:31+00:00): Посмотри видео внимательно. На https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534862281 ни асфальта, ни ограждений - не достроен он. Не надо ему статус действующей дороги присваивать.
iWowik (2017-11-15 09:04:34+00:00): А как туда проехать тогда?
iWowik (2017-11-15 09:06:27+00:00): Кстати, по этому путю должны же с севера в город въезжать
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540260138
iWowik (2017-11-15 09:08:04+00:00): Или они крутятся через светофор и под мостом?
Тогда согласен, что там весь кусок закрыт на переделку и тот заезд на эстакаду тоже.
literan (2017-11-15 09:14:58+00:00): да, все так. На видео видно. А НЯКи не прочухали.
user_5359 (2017-11-14 17:25:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
And please the node into the building.
bubix (2017-11-15 07:55:05+00:00): MI sono permesso di modificare il tuo tag in quanto nel testo della modifica ti riferivi a attacco di mandata per autopompa. Il tag suction point non è corretto per un attacco di mandata . Ho inserito il seguente tag che se anche non ancora approvato è più corretto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dry_riser_inlet

Ciao,
Bubix
fepede (2017-11-15 08:10:59+00:00): Ciao Bubix, grazie per la correzione (e per la nota)! 

Ho aggiunto altri attacchi di mandata in zona, provvedo a corregerli tutti!
eggie (2017-11-14 08:27:44+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-14 08:31:54+00:00): Ik kijk even naar je edit, want het is niet helemaal volgens de "regels."
Op een rotonde moet overigens wel junction=roundabout. 
name=Rotonde hoort er nu weer niet op.
Dit was je eigen edit. Straks nog maar eens kijken.
eggie (2017-11-14 08:38:29+00:00): Als startende mapper zou ik niet beginnen aan zo'n rotonde. Er lopen routerelaties op van fiets en bus. Die loppen niet meer... ook zouden de fietpaden naar de werkelijkheid gemapt moeten worden. de oude wegen liepen er ook nog gewoon doorheen.
Ik draai de changeset terug naar de construction en na reactie zou je een opmerking op de rotonde kunnen zetten zodat een ervaren mapper het op kan pakken.
Graag reactie..
Theske (2017-11-14 08:40:25+00:00): Prima, ik wilde even testen hoe dit allemaal werkt, en dacht de rotonde aan te passen aangezien die een paar dagen geleden in gebruik genomen is.
Theske (2017-11-14 08:41:27+00:00): Er was al een rotonde aangegeven door iemand anders, maar die was anders dan de meeste rotondes die ik zag op de kaarten. Dus dacht het aan te passen. Snap er nog niet zo veel van.
eggie (2017-11-14 08:50:16+00:00): reverted .. graag reactie
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53763414
eggie (2017-11-14 09:09:46+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor de reactie. 
Ik kijk er straks nog even naar de plantekening of ik zet er een opmerking bij. De vorige mapper had alleen de construction aangegeven.
eggie (2017-11-14 10:33:58+00:00): De rotonde heb ik er ingezet inc. busroutes mbv de plantekening. De nu wonderlijke aansluiting bij het fietsknooppunt laat ik zo even anders routeren de fietsroutes niet meer goed.
De fietspaden rond de rotonde staan nu nog op oneway.. Survey is dus nog nodig hier.
Probeer zelf te beginnen met mappen in bv een park of bosgebied zodat je went aan de editor. Ga echt eerst kijken hoe het zit. Neem evt. een track op op gps of mobiel.
.. en heb je vragen meld je op het forum. (zie welkomstmail)
mavl (2018-12-25 20:15:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:56:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:25:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:19:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:47:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:09:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
naoliv (2017-11-14 15:06:47+00:00): Do you mind explaining your edits, please?
There areas are no quarry.
naoliv (2017-11-14 15:10:57+00:00): *These areas
Jay May (2017-11-14 19:21:29+00:00): Please rollback how this border checkpoint used to look
mavl (2018-12-25 19:28:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
vam_002 (2019-04-23 08:21:59+00:00): Hi  Yeni Primasari,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
"way 540369180
way 540369177" classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Track'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance.
Yeni Primasari (2019-04-25 02:45:42+00:00): Hi vam_002

Thank you for comment. I have look this changeset. By the way, this changeset is outside from Bandung. But, I agree with you about those ways classified as 'Track'. I have changed the tag, please check.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:00:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:32:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
radha_madanu (2019-04-16 05:45:04+00:00): "Hi  Ms Kiara,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
"way 540373097
way 540373096
way 540373098" classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance."
mavl (2018-12-25 21:26:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:47:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:46:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:19:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].