piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:38:13+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-08-12 16:27:25+00:00): It seems you change the local name to your language. Remember that name field should use locals name, and put the another language name in the relative language name field. You can use the OpenStreetMap web editor to add other language name.
Alecs01 (2016-08-12 16:26:06+00:00): Grazie e benvenuto!
maxiclimb (2016-10-25 17:26:07+00:00): Cancello il persorso perchè era già presente e questo non fa che duplicare le tracce sulla mappa
Marco Magnano (2016-10-25 19:01:41+00:00): Ok, benissimo. In realtà credevo fosse visibile soltanto dal mio account fino a pubblicazione esplicita.
user_5359 (2016-08-14 06:21:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.
BCNorwich (2016-08-12 18:25:56+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think you may have mapped the surgery on the wrong building.
This building is number 2, the surgery is located at number 2A to the south (see here :- http://www.nhs.uk/Services/GP/Overview/DefaultView.aspx?id=38944) Click this link to see a picture of the correct building :- http://latymerroadsurgery.co.uk/
Regards
senoritachiquita (2016-08-16 08:42:24+00:00): Thank you very much for letting me know, I will move it.
pride_dara (2018-12-26 06:19:13+00:00): Hi,

While working on one of Malaysian City(Kota Kinabalu), Came across your edits where residential roads are marked as track.
Is there any particular reason for this, If not can I go ahead and make necessary changes?
way 436905993
way 436905989
painkill (2018-12-27 11:20:44+00:00): I do not remember, you can correct it without asking
mavl (2016-08-12 18:21:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. После удалений осталось битое отношение http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4046647/history  
  
Оно будет использоваться в будущем?
anpk (2016-08-12 18:35:51+00:00): В этой части развязки все уже сделали. Там в точке сейчас светофор стоит для выезда в сторону вокзала.
mavl (2016-08-15 16:30:49+00:00): Спасибо. Перенёс это отношение на другой участок http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4046647
5m4u9 (2016-08-14 06:41:22+00:00): inncesario el prefijo barrio
przemas75 (2016-08-31 16:31:27+00:00): Ale tak nie robimy dróg:
http://ctrlv.in/835326
(te czerwone węzły zaznaczone)
Musimy te chodniki połączyć, żeby jakiś routing dla pieszych był.
mueschel (2016-08-14 13:50:48+00:00): Hi,
please do not add what3words to OSM. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3words

Jan
Jojo4u (2016-08-13 20:58:02+00:00): Weitere Quelle war http://www.bahnprojekt-stuttgart-ulm.de/en/media-library/detail/media/bahnhof-feuerbach/mediaParameter/show/Medium/
iccaldwell (2016-08-26 09:20:05+00:00): Why do you think this is not brownfield? It's definitely scheduled for redevelopment.
HubMiner (2017-06-02 05:55:40+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436923494#map=19/42.37731/-88.16689

Can you confirm that this junkyard is historic ruins, somewhat matching definition in the link below?

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=ruins?uselang=en-US
rlerner (2022-04-22 05:37:43+00:00): Was probably misclassified. Land use had changed anyways. It was a junkyard, but not any sort of historic or notable ruins. Thanks for the catch.
Commodoortje (2016-08-15 18:02:48+00:00): Inmiddels de juiste BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) contouren aangebracht, met adresnode.
Alecs01 (2016-08-13 09:41:06+00:00): Reverted; please consider you're editing live the OpenStreetMap database
jfd553 (2016-08-30 15:39:26+00:00): La réduction de la relation est louable, dans la mesure où elle est faite correctement. La relation 6300467 est maintenant brisée à plusieurs endroits. Potlatch 2 n'est pas le bon outil pour travailler les relations, JOSM est meilleur.
Corriger la relation 6300467 svp :-)
user_6110846 (2017-10-04 20:28:39+00:00): Вітаю ! А чому прийняте рішення , що адмін левел 3 . Згідно http://orthodox.org.ua/category/1131/list має бути 2 ( 1 то є центр Київ ).. Москва до України відношення не має адже Україна є екзархатом по відношенню до Московського Синоду. Тобто повна автономія . Українська УПЦ такаж самостійна як і Японська Православна церква Китайська праволавна церква , Російська православна церква за кордоном (РПЦЗ ). Дії  окремих митрополитів неповинні спотворювати відображення офіційної структури. Крім того зараз для УПЦ Московського затверджено denomination= ukrainian_church . Russian church є некоректним .
literan (2016-08-13 12:26:19+00:00): Вход это не достопримечательность
Fadlilaa IRM-RV (2020-08-26 00:26:35+00:00): Did some improvement based on Maxar Imagery Premium imagery around your work
flohoff (2016-08-16 15:41:30+00:00): Hi,
ich bin gerade über diesen changeset gestolpert. Was hast du denn da gemacht "..." hilft jetzt wenig als kommentar.

Flo
MKnight (2016-08-16 19:21:08+00:00): Mhh?
Alecs01 (2016-08-13 09:32:47+00:00): Already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/497186177 you duplicated it twice, please pay attention
karitotp (2016-12-06 15:59:41+00:00): Hi AleBM
Thank you for contributing to OSM. While working in this area, I found you deleted some highways that according to your comment are on a private property.  However, why not adding the `access = private` tag instead of deleting them?
MKnight (2016-09-07 11:46:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2130514606 ich nehme an, dass das Su,PH heissen sollte, ich habe es mal korrigiert.
letihu (2016-09-10 14:59:28+00:00): Was hatte ich für einen Quatsch geschrieben? ;-)
aceman444 (2020-11-28 14:39:39+00:00): Hi, how do you know "Mačinézy" and "Slowatch" have a bike pump? One is a cafe and the other a clothes shop. Where do they have pumps? You provide no source of your changes, only mention Mapnik, which is of course non-sense as that is just OSM rendering so can't provide new data. Always quote your real source, at least in the changeset (tags or description).
svacko (2020-12-01 20:28:25+00:00): Hey aceman444 - I suppose you didn't notice the change has been made 4years ago, so you are seriously late with the question (the link I would have used with the change would be most probably dead already). 
Anyway I got the list from the local bike-sharing community back then as I was helping with some community task. Those places were 100% valid at the time of change, though it obviously changed in time as e.g. Macinezy does not exist anymore. Nevertheless, feel free to update if you will find any discrepancy.
aceman444 (2020-12-02 22:49:39+00:00): OK, thank you. I did notice the age of the change, but wanted to know if you maybe remember. So next time please put the real source into the changeset metadata at least. Sadly, I do not trust much info from the local bike sharing community (if you mean Cyklokoalicia), they do all sorts of dubious OSM entries in this city.

If Macinezy cafe as a whole does not exist , please remove it, I haven't been at the place.
yegbin (2016-08-25 20:13:35+00:00): I noticed you put a node for a business in the middle of a street. Check out the on-he-ground rule https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
Don't you think the tags should go on the building way of the business? I couldn't find an actual address for this business so didn't move it myself.
cquest (2016-12-31 14:12:31+00:00): farmyard pour les fermes, mais farmland pour les cultures... ;)
literan (2016-08-13 11:44:26+00:00): тег name:en для перевода, а не для транскрипции, поэтому "Levoberezhnyi beach" я откатываю. И еще - зачем вы везде ставите тег area=yes? Он не нужен.
Commodoortje (2016-08-15 18:29:14+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  changeset gerevert wegens vandalisme. Nodes zijn in werkelijkheid niet aanwezig, Gelieve niet toevoegen omdat het kan, dit schaadt de OSM kaart in ernstige vorm. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
literan (2016-08-13 12:35:10+00:00): зачем капсом?
Alecs01 (2016-08-13 09:31:03+00:00): Non modificare la mappa con note personali per favore, grazie
Robert Whittaker (2016-11-16 12:12:19+00:00): The postcode of "SW9 8JT" on the houses along Hartford Road, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436951345 looks wrong. (SW is south-west London.)
blackadder (2016-11-16 13:29:07+00:00): Cheers Robert. Typo should be CW. I'm in the process of mapping out Davenham so will fix as I'm doing the addressing.

Cheers
Andy
user_5359 (2016-08-16 16:06:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description, please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dretirement_home .
5m4u9 (2016-08-14 06:42:50+00:00): para platos bolivianos utilizar cuisine=bolivian
Luuuddooo (2016-08-16 10:46:25+00:00): Bonjour,

j'ai rajouté les indications de sens unique  manquants (tag  oneway=yes) sur les voies d'accès aux ronds points que vous avez créé.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436951947

Cordialement,

Ludo.
maraf24 (2016-08-13 16:54:27+00:00): Może pubu nie ma, ale adres Włodkowica 21 wciąż istnieje.
Odtworzyłem.
5m4u9 (2016-08-14 06:45:39+00:00): revertí este cambio porque no hay certeza que mapbox satellite sea más correcto que bing maps (imagen satelital).

para mover todo los datos necesitamos comprobar en campo (calles y parques) qué desplazamiento existe aparte del error del gps.
5m4u9 (2016-08-14 06:50:06+00:00): revertí cambio porque también hay que comprobar si mapbox satellite son mejores imágenes.
will_p (2016-08-13 08:49:01+00:00): Here you have added a non-existent admin_level=10 boundary named 'Beeston and Stapleford' but it doesn't even cover Stapleford! Why?

This is just nonsense. I propose to delete this, although will give you a chance to reply first.
alexkemp (2016-08-13 11:41:06+00:00): http://cms.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/parishmaps.pdf (the non-existent Beeston and Stapleford parishes that you are complaining about). It is an unparished area, which covers a *bit* of Stapleford. Stapleford is it's own CP, which I shall add as soon as I get a chance to do so. Please complain to Broxtowe council if you do not like the way that they draw up their boundaries; I do not actually have any control over that.

If you consider that the naming is wrong, then rename it. As I understand it, Beeston is a perfectly valid part of Nottingham and has not, yet, departed from Council control.

There are very few folks mapping in Nottingham, and no women (that I know of) at all. Do you think that all this fuss, which has blown up into a storm just because I'm now mapping in areas which other folks, such as yourself, consider to be *their* territory, is one of the prime reasons for that?

I'm not going away. I *will* keep mapping throughout Nottingham wherever I see fit, whether you like it or not. And remember, what can be deleted can be re-instated.
alexkemp (2016-08-13 12:11:13+00:00): I've renamed "Beeston and Stapleford" as "Beeston". Of course, Stapleford (or at least, the parts of Stapleford that do not appear within the Beeston Unparished area) was already included within the map, since I've already gone through Broxtowe.

Restatement: Beeston *has* departed from Council control (but not, as I understand it, from County Council control), which is why it is an “Unparished area”. I'm surprised that Broxtowe hasn't threaten to delete it from the map.
Colin Smale (2016-08-17 08:28:43+00:00): Alex, could you please explain what you mean by "Beeston *has* departed from Council control"?
alexkemp (2016-08-17 15:46:49+00:00): Why do you want to know?
Colin Smale (2016-08-17 15:53:19+00:00): I expect it is still fully under control of both Nottinghamshire CC and Rushcliffe BC... unless you have information to the contrary?
Colin Smale (2016-08-17 15:55:42+00:00): Sorry, of course I meant Broxtowe BC not Rushcliffe BC
will_p (2016-08-17 17:05:41+00:00): I live in Broxtowe and the statement "Beeston *has* departed from Council control" makes absolutely no sense to me. 
Why would I have been paying council tax to Broxtowe BC if the area isn't under their control?
alexkemp (2016-08-17 19:28:14+00:00): Will is both a senior mapper & also has local knowledge as he lives in Beeston; I'm happy to defer to him.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2016-08-13 13:45:28+00:00): I have undo this change in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41429901 since the name tag isn't for that
Luuuddooo (2016-08-16 10:12:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Dans votre contribution il y a beaucoup de passages piétons connectés à rien du tout donc inutiles
(un logiciel de routage ne trouvera pas de route pour y accéder) et de plus invalides car il croisent d'autres routes sans y être connectés par un noeud commun ni passer au dessus (pont) ni au dessous (tunnnel):


https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967184
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967181
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967180
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967182
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967183
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967179
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967178
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967177
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967176
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967175
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967174
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436967173

Pour cartographier un passage piéton, il n'est pas indispensable  de tracer le chemin, surtout si il n'est connecté à rien du tout,
il est possible de juste rajouter un noeuds avec le tag highway=crossing sur la route principale, comme par exemple ici:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1284539228


Par ailleurs vous avez ajoutés des éléments qui étaient déjà cartographiés, il faudrait effacer le doublon:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4348018674
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4348018669

Cordialement,

Ludo.
pyrog (2022-01-20 08:39:31+00:00): Hi Kaitu,

The description could be replaced by destination with the appropriate format.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI#Luoghi_di_posa

Best regards,
Yves

destination=A.Davrosio 30';Gola Lago 1h30;Isone 3h10;Mezzovico St.ne 3h30|M.di Roveredo 50';Roveredo 1h20;Tesserete 2h|…
kaitu (2022-01-20 09:13:33+00:00): Hi Yves,

sure it could, or at least be complemented with the destination tag. The page you linked applies to the italian routes network managed by the CAI association. This changeset is in Switzerland. Nothing forbids the use of destination also in Switzerland, though.

Personally, I'm rather a fan of the destination_sign relation, as it can provide more details and sort out  lack of clarity (example: when the same guidepost points to different routes leading to the same destination). This is what I mainly use nowadays. It can coexist with the destination tag.

In the old days I had used the description tag extensively, because of lack of established tags. 

I agree that is should be replaced (or integrated) with either or both a destination or destination_sign tagging. 

That's what I'm currently doing when I bump into those old description tags of mine. 

It should be done for all of them. Problem is that I have a huge backlog, and fresh informations to be added as well which I tend to prioritize. I can't promise to update all of them anytime soon, and I would certainly appreciate any help by willing mappers there.
pyrog (2022-01-21 08:22:18+00:00): > This changeset is in Switzerland.

I recognise the swiss guidepost and thought that italiens use the same design :D

> I agree that is should be replaced (or integrated) with either or both a destination or destination_sign tagging.

Yes. In this cas simply remove te description (you already added destination_sign relations).

> That's what I'm currently doing when I bump into those old description tags of mine.

Ok, thanks :)


>  I would certainly appreciate any help

Sorry, I can't. I have a huge mapping of node networks, hiking path, guideposts and snowshoe trails, especially in Jura (France)

We have an "OSM outdoor" Telegram group to discuss mapping of hiking, riding, mtb, skiing… if you are interested.
Unfortunately in french (but with at least one Swiss contributor).

BR
Nakaner (2016-09-26 20:45:58+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe heute einen manuellen, aber schlechten und undiskutierten Import von Rolltreppen von Benutzer sawalter (Quelle auch nicht ganz sauber und fehlerhaft) revertiert. Mentz weiß von dem Revert Bescheid (der Benutzer gehört nicht zu ihnen).

Ich bin auf diesem Änderungssatz gestoßen, weil du die 5 Meter breite, gepflasterte Fahrtreppe gebändigt hast. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298797051/history

sawalter hatte ihr Rolltreppen-typische Tags (Betreiber, Inventarnummer, …) gegeben, aber übersehen, dass width=5 und surface=paving_stones getaggt war. Du hast das in diesem Änderungssatz gelöscht, aber nicht auf die parallele echte Treppe übertragen. Hatte das einen Grund, hast du das Übertragen einfach vergessen oder war es Absicht (die Angabe stammt von Benutzer Rossner mit Quellenangabe "Stationspläne von vvs und Bahn")?

Ich hab's erstmal gelassen, wie es ist, und kein width=* ergänzt.

Viele Grüße

Michael
user_5359 (2016-08-14 06:53:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of your node!!
lostmike (2016-08-13 09:42:37+00:00): Is this really called "v" in Amharic? This seems a little unlikely but I'm no language expert.
Derick Rethans (2016-08-17 21:14:08+00:00): I've reverted it.
tyr_asd (2017-10-15 09:08:41+00:00): FYI: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1171448#
user_5359 (2016-08-13 17:01:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You are NOT a church! For better desription of your buisness please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:39:31+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:39:36+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
chnav (2016-08-13 07:26:45+00:00): ОСМ не место для бизнес-рекламы. Если помещения магазина по данному адресу нет то и POI нет. Удалено.
maraf24 (2016-08-13 16:04:31+00:00): Naprawiłem.
Alecs01 (2016-08-13 13:21:35+00:00): Ciao, cosa significano i numeri che hai inserito come "operator"?
Alecs01 (2016-08-14 11:33:27+00:00): Mi pare di capire che sono i numeri delle linee che passano da lì, ma non è quello il modo di mapparli, ci sono le relazioni che comprendono percorso e fermate, peraltro già presenti, es. questa è la linea 310 direzione Termini: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1936684 ho fatto il revert di queste modifiche
Alecs01 (2016-08-14 11:52:12+00:00): No es así que se marcan las líneas de autobuses, hay que hacer relaciones que incluyen la ruta y las paradas http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Relation:route en realidad ya existen ej. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1936684 volví las cosas al statu quo
maraf24 (2016-08-13 16:05:45+00:00): Nie mogę się zgodzić z treścią komentarza.
Dodałeś szpital dla ludzi.
Poprawiłem.
mavl (2016-08-14 16:48:58+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
Вы писали [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41082483], что правильный адрес у здания, а не у магазина.  
  
Что означает автовокзал (или автостанция) с названием «Тобольская дистанция ПУТИ»?
mavl (2016-08-19 16:19:29+00:00): Сменил тег автовокзала на офис. Дистанция пути это не совсем офис, но лучше, чем автовокзал.
1Quba1 (2016-08-13 07:19:50+00:00): informację o stacji Orlen można znaleźć na http://dlakierowcow.orlen.pl
literan (2016-08-13 12:34:26+00:00): А можно поподробнее, что там за "надгробья"? Там действительно кто-то похоронен? В любом случае, это не monument (читайте определение тега)
Ильин Роман (2016-08-13 07:50:52+00:00): Попрошу людей любящих ломать чужое сначала думать а потом делать
maraf24 (2016-08-14 09:50:06+00:00): Budynek hali już był. Również był opisany. Po co więc te duplikaty?
Alecs01 (2016-08-14 11:40:29+00:00): Era già presente: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3326660094 ho spostato i tag rilevanti (mail, orari ecc. sull'altro nodo)
jeka p (2016-08-23 09:09:57+00:00): Привіт! лапки в назвах не ставляться
user_5359 (2016-08-13 19:56:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add you business information the street. I have reverted you change set.
Alecs01 (2016-08-14 12:11:35+00:00): Reverted; no spam please
mueschel (2016-08-14 17:49:11+00:00): Hi,
can you explain these tags?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83626072
access:bus:condition =no
access:hgv:condition =no
I think this should be 
bus=no
hgv=no

Cheers, Jan
SomeoneElse (2016-08-22 08:31:35+00:00): Oops - something went a bit wrong here.  "highway=primary" got added to Liwonde National Park (presumably by accident).  Are the other two primary highways in this changeset also definitely primary?  One is a river and one is unconnected, so it seems unlikely.
(for info I noticed this after looking at https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/51626/please-revert-change , which is an unrelated problem with the same national park).
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this; just trying to help.  any questions please get in touch.
Best Regards,
Andy
Sawan Shariar (2020-12-12 19:53:38+00:00): Hi Andy,
Somehow I missed the text. But thank you so much for your concern. Already fixed the issue. Thanks again :)
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:39:42+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2016-08-13 19:58:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243479066 ? I Think your entry his a duplicate entry.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-15 13:18:54+00:00): Hello,
Please note that (perhaps surprisingly) wikipedia isn't licence-compatible with OSM.  You can't copy from wikipedia to OSM.  You can, of course, get to exactly the same information via a wikipedia or wikidata link.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend
☆Finvenkulo (2016-08-15 13:44:37+00:00): I'm not copying the whole Wikipedia articles, just geographical names, simple words. So the next time I will have to "reference" Wikipedia, instead of "copy", yes?
SomeoneElse (2016-08-15 13:57:32+00:00): If you're copying the names, then you're copying, not referencing.
Of course, if you have local knowledge of then names (maybe you're a long-time Esperanto-speaking resident of Antarctica!) or if you have an appropriately licensed source (which is surely going to exist) then you're fine.