piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Geography Canada (2019-02-09 01:46:00+00:00): The problem is that neighbourhoods render very small, so by mapping the wards' labels it'll be easier to see and identify which area you're looking at. Also we'll be able to view the ward's name without having to use query features (or zooming in to look at the border markings).
viloan (2019-02-05 02:08:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
jmapb (2019-02-16 22:19:43+00:00): Hi jch8ri -- are the service times you added every day of the week, or Sundays only?
jch8ri (2019-02-19 17:37:00+00:00): Oh sorry, yea its only on sundays.
jmapb (2019-02-19 18:09:24+00:00): Ok thanks -- I revised the service_times field to comply with the standard syntax.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-05 03:09:28+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM, many of these areas you've added clearly aren't parks. 

Check out this link for more information on how to map farmland: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Farm
mavl (2019-07-21 13:31:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:31:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:31:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Leon K (2019-02-21 04:25:56+00:00): This tag should be on ways, not nodes.  I also know for a fact you can't walk on the Western Port Highway!
MowgliB (2019-02-21 21:02:41+00:00): It was completed in JOSM and wasn't obvious that is had tagged nodes as well as ways. I would have thought JOSM would give me a warning if that was the case, that is disappointing. I'm periodically going back through each of the trunk roads where there is no ped/cycling access. Kings way under Crown is another example where it is incorrect. Thanks for highlighting Western Port as well.
Ewen Hill (2019-02-28 21:16:57+00:00): Hi MowgliB, Should the nodes have foot=yes, bicycle=yes also have these. I haveseen a number of notes stating that the navigator is not permitting turns where appropriate. I am not sure if the two are connected however I thought access=all was better by default.
Baloo Uriza (2019-02-05 13:26:40+00:00): This is not "Highway 412 West", refs are not names.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66921403
Baloo Uriza (2019-02-05 13:27:03+00:00): Is this really dual carriageway?  I seem to recall there's a center turn lane on a single carriageway here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66921403
Michael the Narwhal (2019-02-05 14:50:23+00:00): "Highway 412 East/West" is the official (and signed) street name for this section of roadway.  The East/West represent east and west addressing from the 0 line for the City of Siloam Springs (which is Mount Olive Street).

This section is definitely the multi-lane dual carriage way as shown, as verifiable via a survey as well as multiple imagery sources.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:31:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:31:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:31:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:31:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:31:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:31:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
literan (2019-02-05 17:05:10+00:00): правка неверная. Зачем вы массово type=multipolygon	на type=building исправили? Результат - здания пропали с рендеров зачем  на здание Музея Москвы поставили building:levels=6 (когда там два этажа)? Зачем building=apartments менее точным building=residential заменяете? Откатываю правку.
mueschel (2019-02-07 18:52:03+00:00): You and your colleagues are uploading vast amounts of "telenav:action" tags. Please work with your group leader to get your workflow fixed so that these internal markers are not uploaded to OSM!
gendy54 (2020-03-20 17:45:28+00:00): Bonjour Olyon,
Je viens de voir que tu avais mis une relation à l'hôpital de Valence. Je ne vois pas l'intérêt sur du surfacique d'autant plus que le relation est rattaché à la route ?! Ce qui est très casse-pied et complique sérieusement les mises à jour.

Donat
Olyon (2020-03-21 03:24:54+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est moi le dernier a avoir modifié la relation mais ce n'est pas moi qui est créé cette relation. regarde l'historique :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1471734/history
Elle existe depuis 2011 et je n'y suis pour rien. (moi j'ai juste enlevé un node qui était membre de la relation sans raison, ajouté 1 an plus tôt)
Warin61 (2019-02-11 07:23:41+00:00): Hi,
The northern leg of way 668197366 does not connect to way 546709275
EneaSuper (2019-02-05 16:26:12+00:00): Sei sicuro che ci sia un parcheggio per camper a lato strada? 🤔
ernestoandolfi (2019-02-05 16:30:18+00:00): No. Ma dal telefono non riesco a rimediare all'errore. Mi è scappato il dito. Ci va una tabaccheria. Lo faccio stasera. Ciao.
EneaSuper (2019-02-05 17:13:38+00:00): Ah ok, haha, tranquillo 😁
ernestoandolfi (2019-02-05 20:48:03+00:00): Fatto (sto facendo). Ciao
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
yaugenka (2019-02-27 15:00:21+00:00): Hi Jay May. Was waterway relation deleted by mistake?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8890015
It is a tributary of the https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7778370
both have the same name.
Jay May (2019-02-27 20:10:10+00:00): Hmmmmm........... Good question. As far as I remember, I was merging different river elements that had exactly the same characteristics. When you merge 2 elements, it appears as if you had deleted one. I wouldn't be surprised if you told me a river element appears as "deleted". However, I am just surprised to see some relation deleted ...  I would have to make a test
yaugenka (2019-02-28 22:14:50+00:00): Do you happen to have a map with Нішчанка name of this river on it? I think that there is a mistake on wiki. They say that there are two Янка rivers, but I start thinking that there is only one and the other one is called Нішчанка which flows into Янка.
Jay May (2019-03-02 11:42:52+00:00): I remember there was a confusion between Niščanka and Janka. I also think there is a mistake on Wiki, because when I looked at old Polish maps (you can find similar ones at kami.net.pl/kresy), I saw the flow was different at the split point.
yaugenka (2019-03-02 12:43:07+00:00): Probably the post-war chartographers got confused by the Janka lake which made them think that Janka river should be flowing through it. I have created a separate waterway relation for Nischanka river and included it into Janka river relation as tributary. Now it is inline with the pre-war maps which should be the truth.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:32:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Klioda (2019-02-14 14:23:37+00:00): А чего откатили? Вроде же много полезной информации.
MyrikLD (2019-02-14 15:07:29+00:00): В паре магазинов в имени было "Магазин", и несколько подобных косяков. Откатил, поправил, накатил обратно.
dvdzero (2019-02-17 18:17:53+00:00): Hei
hai canecato le modifiche che avevo appena fatto alla nuova esselunga du corso milano.
Ti chiederei di tornare alla versione precedente.
Constable (2019-02-17 20:31:32+00:00): Hi KonTur, dvdzero is saying that you deleted some of the Esselunga supermarket related objects he created in Verona a month ago. What is your source for this edit? Did you survey the area in the last 30 days?
@dvdzero, if you're a local here and you are sure your "version" of the supermarket is correct, I'd agree to partially revert this changeset.
Also, if you like we can discuss this in Italian.
Thanks
Constable (2019-02-17 20:32:03+00:00): Here the changeset details https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=66924227
Constable (2019-02-17 20:42:42+00:00): Just noticed that also this building doesn't see to be 100% correct. "Casa Davarda" seems to be the real name, not "Dawarda", also that 711W doesn't make any sense in Italian. Where did you get that name from? are you sure it's correct? Whenever you find yourself drawing buildings, please make sure you square them, this one needs a bit of adjustment, as of now its shape is a bit badly shaped.

This track instead ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/668408627 ) seems fictional as it's not visible al the available aerial imagery. What's your source for that? during winter months it does often happens that snow gets dug in order to create trails for pedestrian and this could be the case, but I suspect that track doesn't exist during snow free months.
Are you spending your winter holidays in Vigo di Fassa?
Looking forward the hearing back from you, thanks
KonTur (2019-02-18 05:35:52+00:00): Hi Constable!
My source for this changeset is an user report here http://forum.probki.net/topic/15653-karty-osm-evropa/?do=findComment&comment=418146
(You can use googl translate). I also used Bing aerial for . Around supermarket Esselunda there were a lot of wrong data, I tried to correct it.
dvdzero (2019-02-18 22:10:13+00:00): About Esselunga supermarket area, you based on old aerial photos. This are has been changed in last year and i've already updated basing to the real actual sitation but you recently have restored to the old wrong status. Please revert
KonTur (2019-02-19 05:27:25+00:00): Well, you wanna say that this aerial https://binged.it/2V2cgRu is old and not actual? That the building of supermarket is demolished? You can revert  my changeset if it is wrong.
dvdzero (2019-02-19 22:30:31+00:00): done
hoserab (2019-02-05 18:54:48+00:00): These paths don't intersect. The ramp for cyclists and mobility-impaired users is below the bridge to the stairs.
Costamario (2019-02-05 19:10:03+00:00): Yes, really. I was wrong.
4004 (2019-02-11 00:33:32+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
биган уже отмечена вся территория (вы же занимаете несколько здания там?), перенесу теги на нее.
может подскажете, какой из адресов используется, по мясницкой или горького? а то пока оба стоят, на точку с адресом вы офис и навесили
Александр Усаров (2019-02-11 12:19:10+00:00): Здравствуйте. Здание одно. Надо перенести теги. Я указал правильную точку и она одна. Адрес недавно изменился на ул. Мясницкая,27.
4004 (2019-02-11 22:14:18+00:00): а, вот оно что. несколько лет назад занесли всю территорию как биган. здание на углу полностью ваше получается, и там и офис и производство? а остальное это мясокомбината?
повешу теги на угловое здание, адрес по горького оставлю доп точкой (а то на сайте у вас все еще горького, да и яндекс с маркером в гаражах)
Александр Усаров (2019-02-12 05:21:51+00:00): Да, наше здание угловое. Остальные мясокомбината. Адрес сменили недавно 31 января. Да лучше оставить горького доп точкой. Спасибо. По Яндексу уточню.
kirma (2019-02-05 09:39:29+00:00): Taisin poistaa Tapiolassa koulualueelta nimen aiemmin siksi, että se sai nimen näkymään sekä alueella että rakennuksessa. Kannattaisi tarkistaa miten tässä käy ja ihmetellä miten homma pitäisi hoitaa...
kirma (2019-02-05 09:40:34+00:00): Äh. No, pitäisi päättää ainakin miten päin näiden pitäisi mennä. :)
HSL_HRT (2019-02-05 09:47:09+00:00): Minä perustin korjauksia näihin linjauksiin... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool  Tuolla sivulla olevassa kuvassa mielestäni kehoitetaan sijoittamaan nimi alueelle. Olenkin pyrkinyt ottamaan nimen pois rakennukselta ja siirtämään sen alueelle. Sama kuvio mm. sairaaloilla.
HSL_HRT (2019-02-05 09:50:16+00:00): Meidän (HSL:n) OSM-karttatyylikin edellyttää nykyisellään että amenity=school - alueella varustettu way on se jonka nimi karttatyylisssä esitetään. Jos se on rakennuksella nimenä niin nimi ei näy meidän kartoissa mm. reittioppaassa. Tässä nimenomaisessa tapauksessa nimi on näkynyt meidän kartoissa koska rakennuksellakin on ollut tagina amenity=school, mutta sekin on tulkintani mukaan ohjeiden vastainen tagitus, joten olen pyrkinyt noitakin poistamaan.
HSL_HRT (2019-02-05 09:52:44+00:00): Eli alueelle amenity=school & name=* ja rakennukselle building=school. Molempiin on siiten voitu sijoittaa sisäänkäyntejä ja osoitteita.
kirma (2019-02-05 10:53:06+00:00): OK, näin tällaisen tuplanimen muistaakseni aikoinaan Tapiolassa ja muutin todennäköisesti nimeämistä juuri toiseen suuntaan... lähistöllä olleiden koulujen, varmaan myös Sepon koulun perusteella. Mutta hyvä että oppii uutta, tosin uusia kouluja ei lähimaastoon paljoa ilmesty.
HSL_HRT (2019-02-05 12:40:22+00:00): Jep, asioitahan voi tehdä monilla tavoin, mutta hyvä että joku on jaksanut nähdä vaivaa ja kirjata jotain tuollaisia periaatteita tuonne wikiin. Näin saadaan aineisto paremmin homogeeniseksi ja sehän on meidän kaikkien etu että aineisto on mahdollisimman yhtenäistä. Kiitos kommentoinnista! Ja jos ei ole entuudestaan tuttu niin mainostanpa vielä tällaista linkkiä, jonne olemme keränneet hieman periaatteita miten meidän kartat & sovellukset hyödyntävät OSM:ia https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Digitransit   t. Markku Huotari / HSL
ionr (2019-02-07 08:19:11+00:00): Moin, heißt die Straße wirklich "Verbindungsweg"? Auch wenn's toll aussieht auf der Karte, ist das Name-Tag nicht für Beschreibungen, siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Viele Grüße
Viktor
eggie (2019-02-05 09:58:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-02-05 10:21:48+00:00): Hi.. you asked for a review. 
In my opinion the name is Directeursvilla.
But if the name is Villa than it's okay. 
Maybe also adding historic=building
and the architect P.J.H. Cuypers. 
Gr Eggie
mavl (2019-02-28 17:16:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
woodpeck (2019-02-05 09:46:11+00:00): Ich hatte in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2516 darum gebeten, die Eintragung von Daten ohne zulässige Quelle zu unterlassen. Die hier genannte Webseite trägt den Copyright-Verweis "Alle Daten ... unterliegen der freien Lizenz Creative Commons CC BY-SA 3.0 ... Bei Weiterverarbeitung der Daten ist folgender Quellenvermerk zu verwenden:
Quelle: © LUNG MV (CC BY-SA 3.0)."

Das verträgt sich nicht mit der Nutzung in OpenStreetMap (vgl.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility).

Bitte diese Quellen nicht mehr nutzen.
ulamm (2019-02-05 12:02:20+00:00): Danach dürfte OSM auch keine Informationen aus Wikipedia verwenden und keine Namen aus gedruckten Landkarten.
ulamm (2019-02-05 12:27:55+00:00): Außerdem unterliegt, wegen des gestalterischen Aufwandes auch so manche touristische Infornationstafel einem Copyright.

Nach deiner engen Auslegung müssten wir uns als Mapper wie Analphabeten durch Land bewegen.
ulamm (2019-02-05 13:47:55+00:00): Speziell zu LUNG und OSM:
Die Situation hat etwas von einem schlechten Scherz: Das LUNG stellt seine Daten unter CC BY-SA 3.0, damit sie frei genutzt werden können. Bei Festlegungen (GKZ) steht seine Urheberschaft außer Zweifel. Bei Messwerten ist die Quellenangabe eine Qualitätsgarantie. Aber irgendjemand von OSM legt das Verhältnis von CC BY-SA 3.0 und ODBL so aus, dass damit frei verfügbare Daten für nicht frei verfügbar erklärt werden.
ulamm (2019-02-05 19:11:28+00:00): Last not least die Präambel der von Woodpeck herangezogenen Wiki-Seite:
"((Überschirift:)) 
Import/ODbL Compatibility 
((Text:))
This is a matrix for quickly checking compatibility of data released under certain common licenses with the ODbL. Please keep in mind that this is a community wiki page that can be modified by everybody and that it is intended to give you some guidance, but cannot substitute individual legal advice. The content of this page does not necessarily represent the views of the OpenStreetMap Foundation."
Beste Grüße
UL
ulamm (2019-02-06 04:50:46+00:00): Fazit:
CC BY-SA 3.0 besagt: "Du darfst unsere Daten benutzen, wenn du anzeigst, dass sie von uns sind." ref-Tags und source-Tags erfüllen dieses Kriterium.
freebeer (2019-02-08 19:43:36+00:00): > Danach dürfte OSM auch keine Informationen aus Wikipedia verwenden
.
This is correct, we may not use it.
.

> und keine Namen aus gedruckten Landkarten.
.
this is correct, unless either they are in the public domain, or a special waiver has been granted.
.

> CC BY-SA 3.0 besagt: "Du darfst unsere Daten benutzen, wenn du anzeigst, dass sie von uns sind." ref-Tags und source-Tags erfüllen dieses Kriterium.
.
please be to showing me these tags on maps.me or i guess fakebook, in which this data will appear but without specific credit.
thanks.
eggie (2019-02-05 10:08:09+00:00): Dag C Joyce.. Je vraagt om een review.
Hotel de wereld was hier al goed getagd. Het is niet de bedoeling het nog eens op het gebouw zelf te taggen.
Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
In the Netherlands we tag not at the buildingshape but at the adressnode.

MVG,
Eggie
Velox (2019-02-08 16:09:37+00:00): Please add any comments for this bus stop creation
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66925620
literan (2019-02-05 17:20:45+00:00): привет. Не надо прилепливать паркинги (и другие полигоны) к условным линиям highway. Я никогда не поверю, что половина Очаковского шоссе отдана под паркинг. Исправлю.
majkaz (2019-02-11 12:54:49+00:00): Dobrý den, upravila jsem to zadání a přidala zakreslení budovy. Na tom adresním bodu je to hloupost, potřebuje to samostatný bod pro firmu. OSM není zrovna vhodné místo pro reklamu, tak jak je to zadané je tak nějak maximum, co se dá udělat - alespoň Vás případně najdou, zbytek musí obstarat ty webovky.
literan (2019-02-05 17:23:30+00:00): попробуйте еще раз, с английскими тегами и без рекламы
mavl (2019-02-28 17:16:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Tomas Straupis (2019-02-05 11:42:52+00:00): Oho, deleting multilingual names...
Jay May (2019-02-05 13:16:37+00:00): ??????? Where?
Tomas Straupis (2019-02-05 14:31:22+00:00): This is and some other changesets removed name:de.
Jay May (2019-02-05 17:52:15+00:00): I am *adding* multilingual names (especially name:be, int_name, but also name:et, name:de, name:fi, name:pl, name:lt and name:lv tags. If you are talking about the 2 or 3 German names that were in it, they were totally wrong. Not correct phonetically in Russian, Belarusian nor German. 
You will be more than disappointed because as my name is not Tomas Straupis, I added a lot of name:de tags where they are relevant and where the names really do exist :) In Belarus and in Latvia :) 
Btw, I had already notified the DWG about this issue on Belarusian soil so they know why I am doing that :P 
Contrary the the Polish, Latvian etc. names you have been deleting all around Lithuania, those German names were nowhere to be found either in Wiki either in any other sources like pre-war maps or governmental documents. What would you do if you would see some name:en tag that instead of "Vilnius" says "Vylnys" or "Velnias"? You would keep it, right? Knowing that you won't find that name anywhere? :)  Neither in Wiki, neither in governmental documents, neither in archive documents? :) Of course you would :)
In your case, Tomas, you deleted my names despite you knew *very well* they do exist and they are present in various sources. Just in order to vandalize my work and the work of people like me trying to promote tourism in Lithuania for foreigners, which is good for your country. Be happy you haven't been banned. As of yet.
It's ironic you've suddenly become so international, Tomas? But of course, only when it's convenient for you? :) lol I'm afraid you hate me from the very beginning because you are a totally narrow-minded guy, totally blinded by your hatred towards Poles and everything what is Polish. Fortunately, less and less people here in Lithuania have this mentality "Lietuva Lietuvams" because more than 25% of your population has left and they do realize people from abroad are not that bad. Even Polish people. And you also tend to forget Polish was one of the languages of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania for a very long time, which means it is historical for your country.
Ah, and one more thing: contrary to the Lithuanian community, the Belarusian, Polish, and Ukrainian communities have invited me to their events and so on despite I don't even live there. When they have any objection towards any of my edits, they contact me directly before doing anything (mostly directly through chatting communicators like Telegram). Learn friendliness, courage and communication skills from them! It's much better for Lithuania's image!
Tomas Straupis (2019-02-05 18:16:55+00:00): Frederik should have explained to you that using historic maps is not allowed, at least you should not be putting such names into name:xx tags, only to old_name:xx tags as was noticed with a bunch of incorrect names you've entered in Lithuania.
Government data is usually public, but it does not mean it is open, which means you are not allowed legally to put it into other datasets.
Also you should not be decreasing quality of the dataset you're changing, especially after being told about that numerous times.
Be happy you're not banned for that yet. As for your incorrect names you are the only one adding them sporadically, so no use of them and they will fall off eventually.
I have a lot of Polish friends both in Lithuania as well as in Poland, so your nazi remarks are out of place.
As for events, when I will see at least a single useful thing added, there are chances for you to be invited into mappers events.
Jay May (2019-02-05 18:31:47+00:00): Strangely, you are the only one complaining about what I am adding :) Moreover, if it is not useful for you as a Lithuanian using the map in Lithuanian language, it is useful for people using the map in other languages :) 
A lot of the names I had added previously were for public use because they were on wikipedia, wiki etc. :) You haven't checked anything, you just deleted it.
Ah, one more thing: I'm afraid you are the wrong person to state I make nazi remarks :)