piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
alunel (2021-12-19 13:11:01+00:00): ok, si cela n'est pas conforme. Toutefois, malgré plusieurs repérages sur site, j'ai toujours un doute sur l'existence de ce sentier. Le problème des attributs OSM est qu'ils n'apparaissent pas sur les applis qui utilisent OSM: seul le nom des chemins apparait. Du coup, les personnes que j'essaie de convaincre d'utiliser OSM me reprochent que les chemins sont parfois impraticables, voire inexistants. Il me semblait favorable que chacun puisse choisir en connaissance de cause s'il part plus ou moins à l'aventure. de même pour nous contributeurs, de savoir qu'il y'a un doute sur un sentier à proximité de là où on passe, est motivant si on a le temps, d'aller vérifier et corriger. je suis encore allé cette semaine vérifier pour celui-ci, ce qui m'a permis de trouver un autre chemin que j'ai rajouté; mais ne suis toujours pas sûr pour celui-ci. Si j'en perd la marque "existence?", je ne saurai plus lequel c'est...
Vu le degré de certitude que j'ai sur l'inexistence de ce chemin, il me semble qu'il vaudrait mieux carrément le supprimer, et le remettre si on finit par le trouver...
Arnaud Champollion (2021-12-19 15:23:35+00:00): Pour le sentier "existence ?" j'ai supprimé le nom, mais en mettant l'attribut "fixme" maintenant sur Osmose on a ça : 
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=17&lat=43.797038&lon=5.089684&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3&issue_uuid=d151c07f-d4d2-d7d0-bd9a-55481c110d8b
Arnaud Champollion (2021-12-19 15:26:24+00:00): En élargissant la zone, on voit tous les objets en "fixme" : autant de défis à aller vérifier sur place :) 
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=12&lat=43.8313&lon=5.0688&item=4061&level=1%2C2%2C3
alunel (2021-12-19 15:56:20+00:00): ok, merci. j'irai revérifer ce sentier. Je ne connaissais pas Osmose... du coup encore des choses à apprendre: par exemple ca demande à valider des poste de transformateur: j'en ai validé un dont je connais l'existence et qui est un petit batiment sur le bord du chemin; par contre un autre est simplement un petit transfo fixé en haut d'un poteau électrique: un interet à ce que ca figure sur la carte? je peux virer?
Arnaud Champollion (2021-12-19 16:44:05+00:00): Osmose ne sert pas qu'à vérifier l'existence ou pas des objets. Ça peut être pour ajouter ou corriger un tag.

Croix rouge pour signaler un faux positif (signalement qui ne devrait pas être), coche verte pour indiquer qu'on a corrigé le problème (ce qui suppose de l'avoir fait).

Pour corriger le point (avant de le valider) on peut cliquer sur le lien "JOSM" ou "ID" en bas de l'infobulle, afin de lancer son éditeur préféré. (ID est l'éditeur web principal, JOSM est un logiciel qui s'installe sur l'ordinateur).

Donc pour le transformateur, si le signalement Osmose était simplement "vérifier l'existence", oui on peut se contenter de cocher. Si par contre ça demandait à corriger ou ajouter un tag, il ne faut pas valider sans avoir effectué la correction.

Dans la colonne de gauche, on peut activer les catégories de signalements Osmose qu'on veut voir, il y a un peu de tout.

Si tu aimes faire ajouter des compléments et effectuer des vérifications sur place, je t'engage à découvrir ces applications libres sur smartphone : Street Complete, très ludique, pose des questions en direct et en français pour compléter la qualification des objets qui nous entourent.
Osm Go ! quant à lui permet d'ajouter très facilement les points d'intérêt (mais pas les chemins).

Autres applis : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Android
Arnaud Champollion (2021-12-19 16:50:41+00:00): Une autre manière de trouver des choses à compléter / vérifier :
sur la carte principale https://www.openstreetmap.org
en cliquant sur le bouton "couches" (les trois petites feuilles superposées), et en activant en bas la case "notes de carte".
Cela fait apparaître les suggestions déposées par les utilisateurs (qui les déposent en utilisant le bouton en forme de bulle de BD avec le petit "+").
user_5359 (2022-02-01 16:55:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152058790. What is the meaning of the tag plot_name = Unter dem Hart - Teil 1?
voltairovicz (2022-07-10 22:02:05+00:00): Witam serdecznie.
Jedna prośba przy mapowaniu, abyś nie sklejał obszarów z drogami, takiej praktyki nie robimy rysując ;)
aixbrick (2021-12-19 09:44:39+00:00): Hallo,
weißt du zufällig noch, was du an den Gebäuden in Weiler-Langweiler ergänzt und vor dem Upload wieder gelöscht hast, sodass eine neue Version ohne sichtbare Änderungen hochgeladen wurde (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74493, Beitrag #11)? Du kannst auch gerne im Forum antworten.
Gruß
Владимир К (2022-03-15 08:11:58+00:00): Hi!
Is this just for validator?
access=private tag before gates is not valid, isn't it?
GeoidDude (2022-03-16 00:24:38+00:00): Hello, Henosb is not currently on our team, so I can respond on his behalf. I agree, the `access=private` tag does not need to extend before the gate, as you suggested.
demon_box (2021-12-19 22:26:07+00:00): ciao! ho visto che hai messo access=private alla sterrata dopo la sbarra che porta alle case della località "Casini San Filippo" ma non è necessario perchè ho già messo motor_vehicle=private (tutti i mezzi a motore non possono passare, a parte chi è autorizzato), in questo modo si intende che il passaggio a piedi ed in bici è permesso in quanto da lì passano 3 sentieri riconosciuti dal CAI: il 503, 530 e 550. Non sei d'accordo? A mio avviso (e da 11 anni di mapping) aggiungere access=private non serve. BuonMapping ;-))
demon_box (2021-12-19 22:39:47+00:00): ...certo la strada è privata NON DISCUTO, ma passandoci dei sentieri CAI è normalmente consentito (tollerato) il passaggio a piedi ed in mtb. collaboro costantemente con varie sezioni del CAI e ti assicuro che l'orientamento da tutti riconosciuto è questo, ciao ;-)
SimonPoole (2021-12-29 15:25:41+00:00): Partially undone in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115525178
mueschel (2021-12-19 13:12:56+00:00): Hi,
you used "admin_level:ps" here. Country codes are typically written with capital letters, i.e. it should be "admin_level:PS".
Could you change that?
Jeff Underwood (2021-12-19 17:53:22+00:00): Hey mueschel,

Good call. I just cleaned that up. Thanks for letting me know!

-Jeff
highflyer74 (2021-12-21 18:22:15+00:00): Hi Jeff!

Those malformed tags still seem to be here... Check out https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eoG for details.
Jeff Underwood (2021-12-21 19:06:43+00:00): Hi highflyer74,

These admin_level:iso_code tags are used specifically to redefine boundaries to alternate levels such as a country border being defined as a state border instead.  nvk's diary here shows a good example of the use case using India, Pakistan, and China here. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/nvk/diary/390496

mueschel was pointing out that I used lower case iso codes by mistake which has now been fixed, but the tags themselves do serve a purpose. 

Happy to continue discussing these edits if you have more questions or concerns about them. :) 

-Jeff
highflyer74 (2021-12-21 19:11:20+00:00): Ah, didn't know that. In that case: disregard and have a good one ;-)
RicoElectrico (2021-12-20 20:26:18+00:00): Cześć, to jest oznaczone jako uniwersytet (było już przed twoją edycją), ale to chyba nie jest prawda?
Pawelxxdd (2021-12-20 21:07:06+00:00): Nie, to nie jest uniwersytet.
Larmax (2021-12-18 13:21:06+00:00): Pretty sure those pedestrian crossings have traffic lights...
TaneliPee (2021-12-18 15:50:03+00:00): Thank you for the comment! My bad! I have now fixed those crossings to have traffic lights again.
village (2021-12-19 21:39:17+00:00): "L'amour *er* psyché - une
    faute de frappe oú est-ce que vraiment le nom correct de la statue?
overflorian (2021-12-20 07:50:19+00:00): bonjour, c'est une faute de frappe, bien vu ! je te laisse corriger ? encore merci
village (2021-12-20 09:03:04+00:00): voilà #115153647
eggie (2021-12-17 21:36:06+00:00): Dag Electric P.. Je bedoeling is uiteraard goed, maar we tekenen in OSM niet zelf de gebouwen in. Die worden periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG.
Je kunt dit versnellen middels een verzoek op het forum van OSM in het draadje verzoek BAGimport.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-17 21:51:04+00:00): Import verzoek loopt..
Even als voorbeeld aangevraagd zodat je weet wat gebruikelijk is. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=849704#p849704
Gr eggie
FrankOverman (2021-12-18 07:20:45+00:00): Hierbij een voorbeeld import ;)
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=849716#p849716
Ook nog wat meer gedaan, zoals de school en meer nieuwbouw naar het zuiden.
eggie (2021-12-18 07:42:22+00:00): Frank.. bedankt weer..
Gr eggie
Glassman (2021-12-19 18:39:32+00:00): You removed a building at 14148 NE 190th Street but everything I've looked at says the building is still there. Can you confirm that the building is no longer there?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115071181
SomeoneElse (2021-12-18 10:46:08+00:00): Hello JriSv250,
Among the numerous complaints at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11571754 . not using changeset comments that explain what you're actually doing is among the most common.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more details.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
JriSv250 (2021-12-22 21:01:38+00:00): I will try to write more specific changeset descriptions in the future.
Glassman (2021-12-19 18:41:15+00:00): #TIP: rather than delete and add a feature, just revise the geometry. That will save the history of the object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115071573
comercialchatur (2022-01-04 17:05:42+00:00): Por favor cambiar nombre a Chatur Playa Real Resort
Note Control (2022-01-04 18:16:19+00:00): Cambiado a Chatur Playa Real Resort. Tarda algún tiempo en aparecer.
Syl (2026-01-01 11:11:09+00:00): Bonjour, sur les dernières photos de Panoramax on voit qu'un des panneaux a disparu et que son contenu a été déplacé sur un des deux autres. Je ne sais pas duquel des deux il s'agit, est-ce que tu peux t'en occuper ?
Syl (2026-02-27 11:53:02+00:00): Ne sachant pas quoi faire, j'ai juste supprimé le panneau disparu sans toucher aux deux autres.
Tesla (2021-12-17 20:59:01+00:00): Забыл коментарий - обновление ресторана и новыя суши-кухня. Источник - посещение.
Glassman (2021-12-19 18:49:04+00:00): This is a mass deletion of buildings. That is pretty agressive. Can you explain why you deleted these? Did you discuss with any local community or organization?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115072095
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-04-22 14:41:33+00:00): http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=115072169

jeśli mapujesz obszary area:highway to nie kasuj lini higway=* - coś takiego jest błędem
Warin61 (2023-10-07 08:00:25+00:00): Trees don't have addresses...
szydzio (2021-12-22 09:20:55+00:00): Hej ! Dzięki! Fajnie że nie kasujesz starych punktów tylko aktualizujesz je do bieżących adresów. W ten sposób nie ginie historia stary/nowy adres i nie ma zbędnej produkcji nowych nodów :) Pozdr!
adlid (2021-12-18 14:34:04+00:00): Hi.

In this edit and the previous, you appear to have put a number of street names into addr:housename and also replaced addr:street with the incorrect value. For example, the units in Ram Quarter should not have a housename of 'Barley Walk'.

The tags proposed by the FHRS tool are not all necessarily correct and should be checked before applying them. JOSM gives you the option to amend or disable the tags it proposes.
HandyHat (2021-12-19 21:38:12+00:00): Hey there,

Apologies, you are absolutely correct - I've fixed these in changeset 115140277
Glassman (2021-12-19 18:45:28+00:00): You deleted a landuse which I agree looks poorly drawn and an address for a fire station. Can you explain why this shouldn't be reverted?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115073293
pitfire (2021-12-18 17:03:48+00:00): Hallo Unclejay80,

alles in einem Container passt nicht.
recycling:clothes=yes
recycling:glass_bottles=yes
recycling:shoes=yes
Glassman (2021-12-19 18:56:08+00:00): Instead of deleting the trails did you consider marking them as access=no? That why the trail is preserved in case it's needed for search and rescue.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115074151
Canyonsrcool (2022-01-04 18:40:14+00:00): Have the same question, in fact this trail is just no longer maintained, but still allowed for use.
RicoElectrico (2024-01-11 15:11:30+00:00): Cześć, sprawdź proszę tę uwagę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4051018

Możesz w ogóle coś więcej powiedzieć o tym obiekcie? :)
Mister_of_America (2024-01-15 01:53:20+00:00): W tym miejscu jest prywatna mini-kolejka, która porusza się po niewielkich torach kolejowych. Fakt, że jest ona na prywatnym terenie, ale widoczna z ulicy i wydaje się, że nadal działająca. Tam jest bardzo stromy teren i kolejka umożliwia wjazd mieszkańcom z poziomu bramki na poziom wejścia do domu, bez konieczności wchodzenia po schodach.
RicoElectrico (2024-01-15 01:59:54+00:00): OK. Fajnie by było takie informacje moim zdaniem dawać w description. Nie do dowiedzenia się inaczej niż w terenie ;)
Mister_of_America (2024-01-18 12:11:31+00:00): Ja zazwyczaj dopisuję, gdy zmiany są dokonywane na podstawie wizyty w terenie, tu jak widać pominąłem, ale pamiętam tamten spacer :)
olehz (2021-12-18 10:48:00+00:00): Tim, I doubt that you have visited this town recently. Explain why you removed the block from the road?

I do not know why Apple needs to remove blocks, but in fact it is impossible to drive there. Return it as it was!
Myazyk (2021-12-20 15:07:57+00:00): Сьогодні там був я - там відкритий проїзд і односторонній рух. Правда я не знаю доки він там односторонній, бо не йшов по вулиці Франка
Carto_Ferret (2021-12-21 01:28:54+00:00): olehz, thank you for reaching out. Maxar SecureWatch imagery showed the road clear of any barriers as well as some vehicles present, which I determined was enough evidence to remove it. This was a change made through researching the imagery available to me and not in person observation. I understand aerial imagery is not as convincing as ground-level imagery in a situation like this, but it seems as though Myazyk has confirmed the block has been removed, and added a `oneway=yes` tag.
TagaSanPedroAko (2021-12-20 08:26:06+00:00): Just a note, please avoid tagging short-term closures. It's tempting to map them, but remember features may not be frequently updated and OSM data is also used by map/nav apps for offline use. Such closures are better handled by those apps, not the main map.
DP24PH (2022-01-01 05:10:15+00:00): I'll take note of this as offline apps will be taking care of the rest. However, due to further spread of COVID-19 Omicron variant, it is the best to map the temporary quarantine facilities within Burnham Green (with the latest Maxar sat imagery) until the COVID-19 Pandemic goes over.


DP24
DressyPear4 (2021-12-18 16:35:36+00:00): Olá, adicione apenas o que existe.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115075395
gscholz (2021-12-19 05:10:32+00:00): Hi Elvin Shunta,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-78.73220&lat=-1.60337&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-78.73220&lat=-1.60337&zoom=15

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115076062

Can you please fix this?

Kind Regards
Guido
Falsernet (2022-01-17 14:58:33+00:00): Not a single one of these ways is a pavement. I'm not even gonna argue whether bicycle=no is appropriate but please please please make better changeset comments.
SafetyIng (2021-12-25 13:37:09+00:00): Hey, die anpassung der Leitstelle passt nicht soooo ganz. Die war vorher mit emergency=control_centre schon richtig gekennzeichnet....
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aemergency%3Dcontrol_centre
mueschel (2021-12-20 09:13:07+00:00): Hi,
'opposite_track' is not yet used in any other place. I guess you're looking for either
traffic_sign:backward  or
cycleway:left:traffic_sign

Are there some images available, then I might be able to help more.
mueschel (2021-12-25 11:37:10+00:00): Another question: What does "carrier_bike_parking" mean? This term is not used anywhere else.
SafetyIng (2021-12-25 10:45:31+00:00): Hey, 
amenity=school ist nur für allgemeinbildende Schulen. 
Für Berufs(fach)schulen gibt es das Tag amenity=college ; 
Gleichzeitig wird in Namen keine Abkürzungen verwendet (habe ich schon bei den Rettungswachen gesehen) Also hier bitte alles ausschreiben ;)
Passt du das an oder soll man dir da helfen?
mueschel (2021-12-19 13:11:12+00:00): Hi,
please check these changes - there are about 300 "addr:postalcode" instead of "addr:postcode".
zbrown4 (2021-12-19 16:07:23+00:00): Oops, my bad. I will get those fixed up. Thanks for noticing!
Almorca (2022-08-01 10:35:35+00:00): Hola chibisake. Has creado un cine que no veo que exista. ¿Tienes más datos de a qué corresponde para añadirle detalle y que no parezca que hay un cine normal?
chibisake (2022-08-01 10:44:56+00:00): Buenas, no es un cine comercial sino un cine urbano al aire libre gestionado por el propio barrio. Puedo subir foto si fuera necesario.
Almorca (2022-08-01 11:17:27+00:00): Imagino que te refieres a https://www.facebook.com/SputnikVallekas/?hc_ref=ARSVMAwGex1OqDOvxVz9bqBL3kdsttU5Z9TvRYOgCiSOJmmIH1532TW6jeIXqMT5U9Y&fref=nf&__xts__[0]=68.ARBRmcEmskifJ_pGiZ6B5b3Gj0xwvSplG37dzJgKypwMv5AxFzqQFwwHr9nFD_L-mMYAJ811fJDchGJzujTi628jhPGinTIVgSYAprrKlNAf-s5E384sfM0Cspg28b-EKZRlrQcdh0NFzzCuNs9IP9RlHKCjHuSGr7AW-ydFG7_OqJzYoC5dJwpsvX089xVVinaVRSh0o73dV9j6yuotgTSON-mLV1yXFQX7zaPjME4vjyu8JvY6Foxk_m3tZyrZdhINgCxfqDS7LuogeE5Klv7JT6SwDkINIRqMLB2hDsdvGlIr1l_11pw
Si es así luego corrijo la ubicación ya que está más arriba.
chibisake (2022-08-01 11:20:39+00:00): Si, es el espacio situado en la acera de enfrente. Esa plaza que señalas la usan para conciertos y eventos infantiles de verano
Rom1 (2022-02-03 22:11:40+00:00): Bonjour, merci de ne pas supprimer le tag source. C'est une dégradation des données. J'ai tout remis comme avant.
Hervé TUC (2022-02-09 04:08:29+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous ne pensez pas qu'on peut discuter avant de faire un revert ?
Et quand vous dites "dégradation des données" vous auriez un exemple de chemin où l'on peut parler de dégradation des données ?
Rom1 (2022-02-09 21:12:02+00:00): Bonsoir, voici pour illustrer le retrait systématique du tag source https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=115078195 A noter qu'après le revert, j'ai restauré les chemins que vous aviez créés https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116982238
ElliottPlack (2021-12-19 02:12:03+00:00): Hi there, this lake is not a lateral water hazard, it's just a lake. Why would you edit it this way? This is considered vandalism by the community. Will you roll these changes back?

- Elliott Plack  
OSM Foundation  
Data Working Group
DanteD2323 (2021-12-19 04:11:49+00:00): Fixed, sorry about that!
ElliottPlack (2021-12-19 02:09:22+00:00): Hi there, please don't make edits like this without describing the purpose of the changeset. This adds a fairway where there isn't a golf course underneath. Why? Have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

and

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
ElliottPlack (2021-12-19 02:09:36+00:00): - Elliott Plack  
OSM Foundation  
Data Working Group
DanteD2323 (2021-12-19 04:10:36+00:00): Just fixed it, sorry about that!
user_2066394 (2021-12-20 08:30:33+00:00): Die ursprünglich erfassten Hausnummer 36-50 sind jetzt aber verlorengegangen?
Allison P (2021-12-18 17:52:17+00:00): I'm pretty sure the imagery hasn't updated since April.
h551w (2021-12-18 21:04:11+00:00): Oh, yeah I just meant that it's new since the ways were last updated, I'm sorry if I'd gotten people's hopes up about new imagery
渤海西岸 (2022-01-10 09:01:24+00:00): Why delete the "area = yes"？
rza31 (2022-01-23 22:35:44+00:00): area=yes is recognised as an unnecessary feature in OSM.
The automatic repair/deletion is offered by JOSM.
Frans S (2021-12-21 13:26:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115082332
DUGA (2022-07-18 02:12:32+00:00): Please stop adding source tag to the segment, your changeset has "imagery_used".

Imagine the next people editing the same place has to delete all over this kind of stuffs.
taghizadeh11 (2021-12-18 08:20:27+00:00): ok
MarcoR (2021-12-19 09:47:26+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o!
Guardando alle immagini aeree sembra che in quel punto vi sia una sola strada. Ho provveduto a inserire "Via dell'Abbazia" come membro della Strada Provinciale 69; se sei del luogo, potresti controllare che non abbia commesso errori?

Grazie e a presto,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115086035
SPQRobin (2022-02-09 19:15:04+00:00): Why "living_street" in Colomastraatt etc?
Der Bierpuncheur (2022-02-10 02:15:22+00:00): Toss up between living or residential. Revisiting it, residential is appropriate for description, but risk is that AI routers may use it as an alternate when other larger streets become blocked or traffic density increases. Is there a better way to prevent this? In the meantime, I can revert it.
JuanjoMC (2021-12-18 12:53:11+00:00): Hi,

I see that you slightly moved Hellebeekstraat and Sint-Annalaan here, and looking closer it seems that you aligned them with AIV Flanders GRB. Please, don't do that. By doing this you make the road take strange bends, indeed GRB is drawing the physical center of the road while on OSM we map the center of the carriageway. 

I recentered it in the meantime.

Cheers.
Jakka (2021-12-18 10:49:52+00:00): You created a new way ? and adapt geometry some others 
Do not see that the three bus relation a broken.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115087201
JuanjoMC (2021-12-18 13:33:27+00:00): Both routes 231 and 232 were indeed broken by this changeset. I fixed them.

Ways on Bus (and other route) relations must obviously follow a logical order. The think is that, when splitting a way that is part of a route using ID editor, very often the two new ways appear in the wrong order in the relation, thus breaking the route.

In this case, this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013265782#map=19/50.91626/4.36838 was appearing before this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46153379

If for any reason you need to split a way which is part of a route relation you should consider using an editor able to deal properly with this, JOSM does.

Here is a tool where you can check for broken routes: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
On the top left choose Public Transport - Routes. Be aware that the data may be slightly behind, you can see the update date below the map, on the left.

Cheers