piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nyuriks (2017-10-01 02:19:21+00:00): * The discussion was quiet for 4 days
* Every raised point was addressed, as was mentioned in the talk.  Several people meticulously answered all of the objections. One objection was un-answerable because it basically claimed something without backing it up. Regardless, I worked very attentively with every dessenter.
* Wiki has many pages about this effort
* Agree about not having Automated edits/username - I don't recall this was brought up before, but a valid point, will add.
* My account is tied to my main email, and I usually reply within the same day to every message, either on changeset or direct.
* There was no bot - all was done with josm, using well tested built-in tools
* Exactly the same change was being done as before, with the method described repeatably on various forms of media
* The change was not in 6 digits

So from your list, it appears that while I followed the spirit and the scope of the mechanical edit policy (discussed on a global channel until it went quiet, IRC, created a huge system to fix uncovered issues, was always available, etc), I did not create a wiki page Automated edits/username.  Instead of asking me to create it (which I would have gladly done right away), I was constantly harased by you with all sorts of "this edit is too quickly following another edit" or "don't do mech edits" type of complaints, mostly for manual editing. This is not constructive. It felt as a targeted, biased harassment rather than simply asking for additional steps that needed to be performed.
SomeoneElse (2017-10-01 11:48:39+00:00): Thank you for finally admitting that yes, you did perform a mechanical edit and that no, you did not follow the documented procedure.
Which were the 4 days on which you claim there was no discussion on "talk" about this?
nyuriks (2017-10-01 17:33:39+00:00): Serious?  The automated edits were marked with the word "auto", and I kept saying I was doing them mechanically after the discussion!  You correctly pointed out that I forgot to add the auto/username wiki page, which has already been rectified. This is something you could have told me a very long time ago, instead of wasting many hours and aggravation.  This sounds very much like the worst possible government bureaucracy imaginable.
SomeoneElse (2017-10-01 17:51:08+00:00): > This is something you could have told me a very long time ago, instead of wasting many hours and aggravation. 
Lest we forget, a member of the OSM community told you about https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct 12 days ago on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51919550 , and 10 _months_ ago on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43775555 the requirement to discuss was raised.
You can't claim that you didn't know.
Back to the previous question - which were the 4 days on which you claim there was no discussion on "talk" about this?
nyuriks (2017-10-01 19:01:47+00:00): Andy, that article is very long, and only mentions "Automated edits/username" once in middle.  Noone has mentioned that specific piece of information until you did yesterday, and I immediately complied. Until I saw it, I was fully convinced I followed all other rules outlined there. It would have helped everyone to simply say "in addition to everything else you are doing, please add a page XXX to describe it, thanks".  About 4 days :  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-September/078805.html was the last email tangentially related to the proposal.
SomeoneElse (2017-10-04 13:51:28+00:00): > Andy, that article is very long

I'n sorry, but the text on that page is 10457 bytes in total.  Reader mode in FF estimates "10-12 minutes".  If you can't be bothered to read that in full then words fail me.
SomeoneElse (2017-10-04 14:20:39+00:00): Also re "about 4 days" - https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2017-September/078805.html was at "Sat Sep 23 03:15:13 UTC 2017" and the first "auto" changeset seems to be
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52333709 , created at "2017-09-24T17:03:28Z".  This is a gap of 38 hours, between Saturday morning and Sunday afternoon UTC.  This is some way short of 4 days.
I am stunned that you continue to make statements like this that are so easily proved to be false.
UltimateRiff (2017-09-27 23:41:39+00:00): Also added detail to a Highway 69 Cycles from their website.
Essin (2017-10-13 13:14:22+00:00): När man delar upp ways med JOSM måste man vara försiktig, eftersom JOSM inte laddar in alla relationer som en way ingår i om man utgår från en relation eller Overpass-sökning. Den här redigeringen hade sönder https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4166270 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6474659 och antagligen andra relationer som har länsvägsavsnitt som medlemmar. Kan du fixa det, Fringillus?
Fringillus (2017-10-15 00:31:16+00:00): Ja juste ja, de importeras inte. Fixar på en gång, tack
Fringillus (2017-10-17 15:37:55+00:00): Så nu är allt justerat på samtliga vägar, tack för du påpekade, ska komma ihåg detta.
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:50:58+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
trigpoint (2017-09-29 14:09:28+00:00): Hi, what is the source of Telford Estate, those who live there say they live in Monkmoor.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 16:16:34+00:00): Hello AlexC. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528253395 you have tagged `foots` instead of `foot`, right? #typo
literan (2017-09-28 12:50:17+00:00): Привет, спасибо за правки, все просто отлично для новичка) Единственная поправка - адреса правильно писать именно так addr:housenumber=7 к1 (с пробелом). В вики все описано: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr Если что, есть форум https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21 и канал в telegram https://t.me/ruosm - там всегда могут дать ответы на интересующие вопросы
literan (2017-09-28 12:52:30+00:00): Ну, и поликлинику вы задвоили, провели по забору еще одну ненужную линию  (теги поликлиники уже стояли на здании. Наиболее корректно было бы перенести их со здания на забор). Я все поправлю здесь.
user_5359 (2017-09-28 17:47:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the corrected values of opening_hours.
notoncebut2x (2017-10-10 18:36:13+00:00): Great Job....Keep up editing this area!
BCNorwich (2017-09-29 18:28:04+00:00): Hello There, you've mapped this company in the wrong place quite a distance from Renfield Street.
You also removed the building tag from Gallery Apartments, I've reinstated that tag.
Lastly you've got the number and street in a house-name tag.
If you need help with this please just ask.
Regards Bernard
Davie Dean (2017-09-28 04:50:11+00:00): Hi, can I ask what you are trying to achieve here? 

Please don't modify the building incorrectly to fix something wrong in routing software.
Davie Dean (2017-09-28 04:57:08+00:00): I have reverted your changesets for now, to get the building back the way it was.

As the building has an address, it should be enough for a router to locate it. Which route planner are you using that isn't working?
Davie Dean (2017-09-28 05:04:35+00:00): It does show up in the main OSM search engine: http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/search.php?q=1+william+st%2C+brisbane&polygon_geojson=1&viewbox=
daganzdaanda (2017-09-29 11:17:27+00:00): Hi Nyuriks,
in this case, I think "artist:wikipedia" would probably be better than "subjectct:wikipedia". I can change that, but could you check if you had some other artworks in your changesets where artist and subject got confused?
nyuriks (2017-10-01 05:50:57+00:00): Hi, here's the map of all objects, whose subject:wikidata points to a sculptor, or a subclass of a sculptor:
http://tinyurl.com/y84mu9nf  (there are 9 of them).  You do raise a good point that it might be the artist and not the subject. Thanks for bringing it to my attention!
daganzdaanda (2017-10-02 13:18:48+00:00): That query is an interesting way to check this! I just noticed the "artist_name" tag on this node and would have tried to look for other objects with artist_names.
daganzdaanda (2017-10-02 13:29:02+00:00): OK, the other nodes seem to be correct as far as I can tell by the context of each. Only one is tagged as "monument", which might be wrong.

At this location here, there's also a tree called "Linde" which just shows that where there is one error, there are often more. I'll change this now...
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 18:57:26+00:00): Hello iWowik. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528271978
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528271979
you have tagged `buiY=PL`. What is it for? Should it be `building=yes`? #newkey
opendcc (2017-09-28 09:25:07+00:00): Hello,

welcome to openstreetmap. You added some tourism attraction at 'special' places (inside buildings, in the middle of a street ...), could you please explain in detail the type of these attractions? Thank you.
Kiekin (2017-09-28 06:13:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dagriculture
BeKri (2017-09-29 12:57:13+00:00): Servus lyctkel,
so begrüssenswert Deine Beitrag (Hausnummer) auch ist,
wenn Du die History ansiehst wirst Du sehen, daß
in V#2 die Adresse eingetragen und
in V#3 wieder ausgetragen zu werden, Begründung: Konstanz, Zur Therme 2: doppelte Adressen gelöscht.
Es ist anzunehmen, daß es Deinem Eintrag ähnlich ergeht.
Gruss derBeKri
lyctkel (2017-09-29 19:57:58+00:00): Moin  Bekri,
das kann natürlich geschehen, aber im Grunde ist das Restaurant nicht korrekt eingezeichnet, da dieser Gebäudeteil im Erdgeschoss zum Restaurant und im ersten Stock zur Therme gehört.
Mir erscheint ein Punkttag für das Restaurant im Grunde sinnvoller (so tagge ich für gewöhnlich), jedoch wandle ich area-Tags normalerweise nicht um.
Eigendlich sollte man das Thermengebäude auch auf den Restaurantteil ausdehnen und dann ein Punkttag verwenden.
Da das Restaurant momentan jedoch nicht Teil des Thermengebäudes ist, ist die Hausnummer nicht redundant.
Trotz Alllem vielen Dank für deinen hinweis. Ich werde mir in Zukunft mehr Gedanken machen.
BeKri (2017-09-29 23:56:06+00:00): Servus lyctkel,
man könnte auch eine Poly über die Gebäudeteile mit der Adresse zusammenbauen, den Gebäudeteil mit Restaurant dann halt ohne Adresse, die muss man sich halt irgendwie aus dem Poly "saugen".
Ich würde wie Du auch dei Adresse drauf lassen, ist aus meiner Sicht bei POI auch nicht verkehrt, ich hab halt nur eher per Zufall die History gesehen und Kollege unter V3 hat den Ruf a bisserl "sein Revier  sauber zu halten" sonst hätte er sie ja nicht schon mal rausgenommen. Insofern konnte ich mir ein "virtuelles" grinsen nicht verkneifen ;-) Gruss derBeKri
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 18:05:40+00:00): Hallo Lübeck. Bei den Wegweisern
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5134396539
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5134396538
ist es ausnahmsweise ein `direction_*` (mit Unterstrich) im Gegensatz zu `direction:*`. Guckst du http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:information%3Dguidepost ;-)
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 18:06:23+00:00): Und noch ein paar mehr Wegweisern, also am besten einfach nochmal alle prüfen ;-)
KelvinKLi (2020-01-24 22:09:08+00:00): Hi bhavana naga,
My name is Kelvin and I work on the OSM editing team for Lyft. While editing the area in question, I came across this way segment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401480904 in OSM. Per OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination_details middle segments between on ramps and off ramps should not be tagged as destination:ref.  Can you please revert this changeset #52432412 and remove the destination:ref tag? If you have any further evidence that disproves this, I would be happy to learn more.
Thank you!
kli_lyft
compdude (2017-10-23 03:34:39+00:00): I can't quite figure out what you did to this relation, but this edit is the most recent to the relation and now Gifford Pinchot NF is not displaying on the map. Can you please fix this? Thanks!
MatthewAndersonUS80 (2017-10-23 09:08:35+00:00): The National Forest wasn't showing before I did this. I tried to fix the issue, but for some reason, it didn't work. I'll try and mess around with it tonight and see if I can get something working again.
user_5359 (2017-09-28 16:34:44+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!. Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Punkte / Wege, die nur einen Namen besitzen, sind sinnlos. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a .
RSergei (2017-09-28 11:30:26+00:00): Безусловно круто! Единственно Если вертолётная площадка обозначена территорией, не нужно точку оставлять, я её примерно когда-то ставил. Ну и адресация "строения" просто "с". Успехов!
pesec (2017-09-29 03:39:34+00:00): Принято. уточнил.
zstadler (2017-10-02 06:17:24+00:00): Thanks for the fix!
user_5359 (2017-09-28 17:38:49+00:00): For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
Franti rise associazione (2017-10-03 22:42:02+00:00): costable quale imagine hai utilizzato per aggiornare la mappa con questi due edifici. hai utilizzato josm ?
Constable (2017-10-04 06:29:52+00:00): Ciao, credevo fosse tua questa nota ed avessi visto la mia risposta http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1154644

DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery, editor iD, tutto visibile qua sopra nei dati del gruppo di modifiche.
Franti rise associazione (2017-10-05 21:51:04+00:00): perdonami, non sono così pratico. per editare di solito uso l'editor online e le immagini di "Mapbox satellite". Ma immagino che tu hai fatto riferimento ad immagini più aggiornate (con JOSM la più recente è del 2012). puoi dirmi cosa hai utilizzato. scusa ancora , ma sono agli inizi
Franti rise associazione (2017-10-05 21:51:30+00:00): si la nota era mia...
Constable (2017-10-06 07:05:08+00:00): Ciao, ho usato iD, l'editor da browser, vedo che anche tu lo hai usato per le tue ultime modifiche. Una volta aperto se usi i tasti nella parte destra dello schermo puoi selezionare diverse immagini satellitari, io ho usato la prima in alto, "Escri World Imagery"
eggie (2017-09-28 07:55:42+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
contrapunctus (2017-09-28 07:54:49+00:00): Argh, I very certainly wrote "Add alleys in Chanakyapuri (Nyaya Marg and Dharma Marg area)" in the changeset comment! D:
MissingCSAA (2017-09-28 17:41:40+00:00): The article states that the stretch from I-215 south has been renumbered and that the signs are on order. Some of the signs are already up. I will be reverting this edit.
drazde (2022-10-22 12:15:57+00:00): Ciao, ma esiste ancora questo sentiero? sono passato due settimane fa dal sentiero delle Garne e anche cercandolo non lo ho trovato
eggie (2018-10-10 21:44:24+00:00): Al een jaar een account, maar voor HOT OSM begonnen met mappen. Nuttige bijdrage.
Alsnog welkom bij OSM Nederland... Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 19:14:14+00:00): Hello atari_matari. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/273874739 you have tagged `name:yes` instead of `name:en`, right? #typo
atari_matari (2017-10-06 08:47:39+00:00): Yes, it's not supposed to be name:yes, but noname:yes. I usually edit with JOSM, but this was added with iD, and it sometimes adds strange tags. Thanks for the catch.
dgitto (2017-10-06 07:43:26+00:00): benvenuto in OSM!
aceman444 (2017-11-12 15:30:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for the added shops. Please try to specify also shop type according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop, not just shop=yes. I will try to fix some shops in this changeset.
Thanks.
Supaplex (2017-09-28 10:34:00+00:00): building:levels也要去掉
roschitom (2017-10-02 17:16:05+00:00): Stimmen die Öffnungszeiten? Auf deren Webseite steht was anderes.
Der Name ist etwas oversize. Was steht den vor Ort dran?
imochen (2017-10-04 09:12:38+00:00): Ja, die Öffnungszeiten sind anders, allerdings weichen die vor Ort auch wieder von denen der Webseite ab.
Vor Ort steht auch genau dieser lange Name dran. Vielleicht doch auf VG Bioeck kürzen?
roschitom (2017-10-04 09:49:16+00:00): Wenn alles so stimmt, würde ich es auch so lassen. Anders betrachtet haben wir hier 2 Dinge, die Verbrauchergemeinschaft als Verein und einen Laden. Da wäre Bieoeck zutreffender.
Hat der Verein ein Büro in den Räumlichkeiten?
imochen (2017-10-04 09:56:32+00:00): Ich passe die Öffnungszeiten mal an die an wie sie vor Ort stehen. Auf der Website steht das sie Freitag Vormittag offen haben, was vor Ort nicht steht. Werde dann Freitag einfach Vormittags mal vorbei schauen und schauen ob sie offen haben und es ggf. anpassen.

Ich war bisher erst zweimal drin, meine mich aber an kein Büro erinnern zu können. Die Klingelschilder habe ich allerdings nicht durchgeschaut. Auf der Seite steht aber überall nur die Adresse des Ladens.
roschitom (2017-10-04 10:13:26+00:00): Zur  Not mal dort Fragen.
Dann könnte man in Verein (club, office) und Laden (shop) trennen.
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-30 18:25:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. In this change you have added access=no to way 290157585 which had highway=footway and foot=yes. This has no effect other than to make it unclear whether you intended to prevent pedestrian access but omitted to change the foot tag. For highway=footway, all other forms of transport are by default denied anyway. To clarify the situation, please remove access=no and either set foot=no if pedestrian access is prohibited, or leave it as yes if is allowed.

Happy mapping,
Mike
Hjart (2017-09-28 20:49:21+00:00): The shelters added here are probably https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dlean_to ? (for the past 2 nights I used this type myself)
drkt (2017-09-28 23:02:50+00:00): Seems to be https://i.imgur.com/nUplgO2.jpg
These shelters in particular are also paid-to-use. I don't know if you're supposed to tags paid shelters.
Hjart (2017-09-29 06:33:01+00:00): Lots of paid camp sites have been mapped extensively, so I guess these can be mapped too.
What you're "supposed" to map largely depends on the individual contributor.
You can largely map whatever you feel as long as it works for other contributors and data users.
Alecs01 (2017-09-28 14:29:12+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro di non esserti confuso con l'incrocio vicino? c'è già una via Firenze http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125987179 e il McDonald's all'angolo http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2139917819
lpelo2000 (2017-09-28 15:30:21+00:00): Cavolo si. Grazie
Alecs01 (2017-09-29 16:35:04+00:00): No problem, corretto!
Dakon (2017-09-29 19:39:50+00:00): Suchst du man_made=measuring_point;type=groundwater (siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/water_network)?
Hb- (2017-09-30 18:04:16+00:00): Mit substance=groundwater erledigt.
eggie (2017-09-28 10:42:19+00:00): Tip: Op een footway hoeft niet foot=yes en bicycle=no Haal je het er weer af?
Dit was je edit.
Zier de default tags voor wegen. in Nederland: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
SomeoneElse (2017-09-28 10:07:29+00:00): Hello.
Can you explain what these "viewpoints" that you have added here are?
People have tried and failed to contact you previously about this ( http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4139826 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1099 ) so please do reply.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2017-09-28 10:08:08+00:00): สวัสดี.
คุณสามารถอธิบายว่า "มุมมอง" เหล่านี้ที่คุณได้เพิ่มเข้าไปได้คืออะไร?
ผู้คนพยายามและไม่สามารถติดต่อคุณได้ก่อนหน้านี้เกี่ยวกับเรื่องนี้ (http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4139826 และ http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1099) ดังนั้นโปรด ตอบกลับ
ด้วยความเคารพ,
แอนดี้
andi9876 (2017-09-28 17:19:47+00:00): Dear, please not again, reverted aleady.
riiga (2017-10-03 17:03:29+00:00): Hi, why have you changed the ref?
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 19:16:09+00:00): Hello Perimex. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5130497511 you have introduced the new key `NaNE`. What is it for? Or should it be the `name`? #newkey #typo
dgitto (2017-09-29 20:34:35+00:00): And also, names should be in lower case
Alecs01 (2017-09-28 10:30:41+00:00): Per l'ennesima volta, non cancellare e ridisegnare senza guardare cosa fai, continui ad esempio a danneggiare relazioni di svolta come questa, di cui hai cancellato il primo tratto, potresti correggerla per favore? http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2627227/history
mavl (2017-09-28 17:20:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. В названии объекта нужно указывать только название. "Продукты" - это не название магазина. Это вид товаров, которые там можно купить. 
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name?uselang=ru
ACS1986 (2017-09-28 14:49:59+00:00): Hi,

It's great that you've mapped more details (roads, works...) on Red Scar. 

The whole of Red Scar is already mapped as an industrial estate, so adding extra smaller landuse=industrial areas on top for each individual unit is unnecessary and can create problems. If an area has a landuse tag it doesn't need another.

I'm a local mapper if you need any help just shout.

Kind regards,

Adam
XXXX_238222 (2017-09-28 14:51:44+00:00): Hi dude, sorry the new landuse industrial areas are meant to be new Industrial buildings which have been added to the site. Would you be able to fix this?

Thanks for your help!
KBB
ACS1986 (2017-09-28 16:32:12+00:00): No problem.  I see the buildings on the aerial images. Are they both used by Nutree Life?
XXXX_238222 (2017-09-28 16:37:32+00:00): Only the left half of the North building is. The other part and the South building is mixed use industrial.
ACS1986 (2017-09-28 16:47:07+00:00): Ah, okay. So you were nearly there, just wanted the buildings tagging as building=industrial rather than landuse=industrial. I've changed the tags now and the buildings should show up on the map properly soon
Cheers,
Adam
XXXX_238222 (2017-09-29 08:17:41+00:00): Ahh thanks for that! Cheers :)
user_5359 (2017-09-28 17:28:38+00:00): For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .

If you need help: You are welcome!
arvdk (2017-10-02 09:41:07+00:00): Hoi SCNC, 
Wat is nu nog het verschil met https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1173941 ? ( Door jou aangepast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77164822 ) De way die jij nu beach noemt, omvat ook stukjes gras en bos. Ik vond de oude tags beter.. jij?
SCNC (2017-10-02 12:48:54+00:00): Almeerderstrand is een strand, vandaar de tag beach, daarmee ook gelijkgetrokken aan het silverstrand, dat ook de tag beach heeft, het klopt overigens dat het almeerderstrand ook gras en bomen partijen bevat, maar dat is onderdeel van het strand
mavl (2017-09-28 17:25:48+00:00): Здравствуйте. Магазин "Магнит" вы обозначили как супермаркет. Супермаркетами в OpenStreetMap обозначают большие магазины [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop=supermarket?uselang=ru]  
  
Этот магазин делит небольшое здание с другими заведениями и вряд ли является большим. Тут скорее обычный магазин shop=convenience.  
  
Супермаркеты вне районных центров в Тюменской области мне не попадались до сих пор.
user_7622 (2017-09-28 19:48:33+00:00): Hallo wwwasi

Ist dieser Kreisverkehr wirklich zurückgebaut worden? Es ist zwar schon ein paar Monate her, dass ich dort durchgefahren bin, aber meine Aufzeichnungen von damals machen noch den grossen Kreisbogen.
TourenbikerFKB (2017-09-29 06:33:59+00:00): ist wohl tatsächlich zurückgebaut, wenn man diesem Zeitungsartikel vertrauen darf: http://www.schwaebische.de/region_artikel,-%E2%80%9EDenkwuerdiger-Tag%E2%80%9C-Lueckenschluss-hin-zur-B-30-_arid,10735015_toid,668.html