piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SHARCRASH (2015-06-26 10:00:35+00:00): Note: the animal shelter adopted the french name according their website.
givchik (2015-06-26 11:32:55+00:00): Первая велодорожка в Чернигове!
Smiljan_02 (2015-07-06 11:50:38+00:00): Hallo Rager01,
erst mal herzlich willkommen bei OSM.
Könnest du dir deine Erfassungen in Gera bitte noch mal ansehen, das meiste ist jetzt doppelt erfasst, Bsp.: Rewe, Aldi, Theater, Orangerie ...
Viel spaß beim Mappen, 

Senni aus Erfurt
Rager01 (2015-07-06 18:07:18+00:00): Hallo, keine Ahnung was da passiert ist. Im Edit Modus bei mir war keinerlei POI Zeichen zu sehen. Jetzt scheint es aber zu passen. Habe heute noch ein paar POIs ergänzt, hoffe da ist nichts doppelt. Ggf. mache ich aber auch was falsch?
Rager01 (2015-07-06 18:30:05+00:00): habe jetzt nochmal geschaut. Im edit Modus mit der Bing Karte im Hintergrund sehe ich einige POI nicht, wenn ich dann die OpenStreetMap (Mapnik) in den Hintergrund lege, sind mehr POIs sichtbar, aber ohne diese bearbeiten zu können.... ???
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-05 18:51:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356548151 a po co te nazwy typu Spokojna 12b?
715371 (2015-06-27 18:37:02+00:00): Die Nutzung von highway=bus_guideway passt hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356550624 nicht mit der im Wiki beschriebenen überein. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=bus%20guideway?uselang=de
rskedgell (2023-07-25 22:21:16+00:00): Re: fixme about the purpose of the building by the lake in Beckton District Park (w41151618) - it was a café and toilets, disused for years.
chnav (2015-06-27 18:18:57+00:00): Я подправил теги квартирного дома. PS: все здания рисуются по фундаменту, не крышам
5m4u9 (2015-06-26 19:53:50+00:00): Genial. Gran aporte en hiostales y la oficina de la ABT. 

Cuando se pueda, sería útil añadir info de contacto, tener su correo, teléfono, horario de atención para preguntar a estos lugares y saber antes de ir...

Sigue así.
Setti (2015-07-16 09:21:22+00:00): Hey Ramadyan,

could you get in touch with me about this changeset and changeset number 32182461? Seems to be an import right? JOSM Validation notifies more than 1000 Errors because off this. Most of them are duplicated nodes.
Cheers Sebastian
Ramadyan (2015-07-16 18:35:08+00:00): Hi Sebastian,
it looks like the electricity network dropouts and then make my computer died. apperantly my mistake when I import again my last job and uploading again.
I'm so sorry about this, let me try to fix it.
Setti (2015-07-22 14:22:13+00:00): Hey Ramadyan,
I think I could fix it. I used the "fixing" tool in JOSM Validation. Do you know about it? It was pretty easy. Thanks again to Roland from the Data Working Group. He told me about it.
I dont know if Roland talked to you but it would be nice if you try to use smaller changesets next time so in case there is a blackout the problem wont be so big.
If you have any questions just ask.
Cheers Sebastian
fx99 (2020-01-17 15:59:45+00:00): Schiebebühne Zahnradbahn-Depot 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95415969 see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway%3Dtraverser
Jojo4u (2021-03-22 21:27:00+00:00): nett :D
gormo (2015-06-29 20:49:47+00:00): Hallo Hagzissa, wieso denkst du denn das die ganzen Klippen im Harz Gipfel sind? Ich finde Gipfel da ein bisschen übertrieben. Es sind halt Klippen, die im Wald rumstehen. Gipfel ist für mich etwas, wo ein Berg drumherum ist.
Oder gabs nen anderen Grund, wieso du da überall Gipfel draus gemacht hast?
derwaldmensch (2015-06-30 12:14:43+00:00): Hallo gormo, grundsätzlich ist das schon richtig und wird in anderen Gebieten (z.B. Pfalz, Erzgebirge, Elbsandstein) auch so gehandhabt. Allerdings sollten diese Klippen dann auch Gipfelcharakter haben wie z.B. die Feuersteine bei Schierke. Leider gibts bei OSM keine Unterscheidung zwischen Berggipfel und Felsgipfel. Das Tag natural=cliff geht jedenfalls noch mehr am Ziel vorbei.

Gruß Waldmensch
Hagzissa (2015-07-01 06:16:52+00:00): Hallo gormo, also ich bin seit meiner früsten Kindheit in dem von mir bearbeiteten Gebiet unterwegs, sozusagen mein zweites zuhause. Na ja, Sohn eines Geologen usw.
Auch ich finde es eigendlich großen Quatsch Klippen als Gipfel zu bezeichnen. Ein Gipfel ist die Spitze eines Berges und eine Klippe ist eine Klippe. Nun habe ich mir vor 2 Jahren Osmand aufs Handy geladen und angefangen bei Open StreetMap mit zumachen. Habe mich immer geärgert, das unsere wunderschönen Klippen im Harz nicht so einfach auf der Karte auftauchen, sondern immer nur als Massen von nervigen, großen, orangenen Klecksen POI genannt zu finden sind. Vor über einem Jahr habe ich auch mal an OpenStreetMap geschrieben ob sie das nicht vielleicht auch ändern könnten. Da ja Klippen genau wie Berggipfel oder auch Flüsse natürliche, vorhandene Örtlichkeiten sind und ebenso gleich auf den Karten zu sehen sein könnten. Hab zwar eine Andwort bekommen das meine Nachrichr eingegangen ist. Aber das wars. Da andere Nutzer auch schon einige Klippen als Gipfel eingetragen haben, habe ich mich nun entgegen meiner Überzeugung entschieden, die von mir mal als Klippen eingetragenen auch so um zu benennen. Gut finde ich es nicht, aber so sind sie wenigstens gleich auf der Karte sichtbar. Und in anderen Gegenden wird es ja anscheinend auch so gehandhabt, wie derwaldmensch berichtet. An dieser Stelle auch schöne Grüße an derwaldmensch. 
Grüße Hagzissa
mavl (2015-06-26 17:10:41+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Добавлять тег addr:city=Тюмень для каждого дома нет смысла, потому принадлежность дома к населённому пункту определяется по попаданию этого дома в границу населённого пункта.
Filip009 (2024-09-27 20:08:48+00:00): Hello, why you have decided to put highway=path tag onto national boundary?
Domcsi (2024-09-28 08:15:25+00:00): Hello Filip009!
Because that's where the road goes.
Filip009 (2024-09-28 11:39:21+00:00): But don't you think, that it would be better to map it separately? Now when someone want to move the path, he will also move with national borders.
mavl (2015-06-26 17:16:29+00:00): Здравствуйте.
"name=район с травой" это вовсе не имя, а в лучшем случае описание, которое уже понятно из обозначения natural=grassland.
Тег name удалён.
hadw (2017-05-15 13:56:41+00:00): You have set the source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/416471 to http://af3v.org/CarteAF3V/-Carte-des-grands-itineraires-.html , but when I look at that page, it says that the map is copyright and reproduction is forbidden.

Any source used for OSM must either be in the public domain, which cannot be the case here, or must be released, under a licence that has been approved by OSM.

Could you either point me to the grant of an approved licence for the use of data from that web site, or remove any data that you added to the map based on that web site.
mavl (2015-06-26 17:19:47+00:00): Здравствуйте.
name=Парковка - это не имя. Этот тег удалён. Вместо него добавлен тег amenity=parking.
Vincent de Phily (2015-06-29 09:08:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM, good first changeset :)

Two small nitpicks to improve things later on:
* Whenever possible, don't use abbreviations. The idea is that computers can abbreviate for us, but the reverse is much harder (is "st" for saint or "street" ? etc)
* A school is the whole grounds and buildings, not just the buildings. So the grounds have the school's name, not the school's courtyard's name. And the building gets at most an addr:housename, if it has an own name, like "O'Reilly building"  or somesuch.

Check http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=school for other tips. Some tags that I always try to add for schools is school=primary/secondary, religion/denomination, and male/female.

Enjoy your mapping :)
Brian Millar (2015-06-29 13:08:06+00:00): Thank you for the helpful feedback and advice, its noted and I'll try to follow it in the future. I'll update my changes now to match the guidelines. Thanks again :)
Vitaly T (2015-06-26 17:30:41+00:00): как-то не очень получилось - собор пропал )
Superadlen (2016-12-30 13:31:38+00:00): mercik
zarl (2016-05-25 08:46:46+00:00): Hi Anoniman,

ist denn https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98603457 immer noch gesperrt? Ist ja wohl ne Weile her...

Gruss,
Zarl
Anoniman (2016-05-25 09:49:36+00:00): Ja, tatsächlich ist dieser Teil der Unterführung noch immer gesperrt. Es wird wohl noch viele Monate dauern, bis die Stadt sich dazu entschließt, das Bauwerk zu reparieren. Wobei ich mich dabei frage, ob die Versicherung des LKW-Fahrers, welcher den Unfall verursacht hat, schon gezahlt hat und wenn ja, warum dann noch nicht längst mit den Reparaturen begonnen wurde.
zarl (2016-05-25 10:06:34+00:00): Danke für die Info!
kocio (2017-09-10 04:08:30+00:00): Hej,

Trasa biegu to byt efemeryczny i nie nadaje się na OSM. Proszę popraw te drogi na prawidłowe, bo to nie jest obiekt typu stała ścieżka biegowa, tylko trasa po różnych istniejących drogach.
Tomasz_R (2017-09-10 06:09:51+00:00): Słuszna uwaga, poprawiłem.
Warin61 (2017-03-31 02:45:17+00:00): Opps deletion of way 98544635 has removed the outer for relation 1412923 wood. 
So I have deleted the relation ...
Baloo Uriza (2015-07-08 18:33:24+00:00): WA 500 doesn't make any sense as a motorway due to it's short length and high number of at-grade intersections (at least 2 in 4 miles).  Typically, motorways have no at-grade intersections, or extremely rare.  Good example of a motorway with at-grade intersections would be US 412 in Oklahoma, with a ratio of 1 intersection in approximately 105 miles.
Baloo Uriza (2015-07-08 18:35:31+00:00): Further, there's no real justification for changing the highway tag for such short segments of highway, the characteristic of SR 500 doesn't change during it's entire length; the map should reflect it's consistent nature.  Another similar highway that is consistently tagged correctly of the same characteristic would be OR 224 between Milwaukie and Clackamas.
Bickendan (2015-07-08 22:05:31+00:00): I wonder if this is a discrepancy in the definitions being used for motorways, freeways and expressways for OSM's purposes (noting that 'expressway' does hold different meanings between the east coast and the west coast of the US). 
SR 500's length should have no bearing on whether it is a motorway or trunk, otherwise a good number of short freeways would have to be reflagged as trunk routes, including I-105 and Delta Highway in Eugene, US 30 in Portland on its approach to the Fremont Bridge, and SR 432 between I-5 and Longview, WA. 
How I've flagged the sections of SR 500 is accurate to the route in the field -- it is a freeway from I-5 to NE 42nd Ave, and again from NE 54th Ave to NE Fourth Plain Blvd in Orchards, with the segment in between as expressway because of the two at-grade intersections. It is divided for the length between I-5 and Fourth Plain Blvd, making a comparison with OR 224 dubious, as it is only divided between SE Freeman Way and SE Rusk Rd; 224 does change characteristics along the Milwaukie Expressway. 
The Wikipedia article notes that WSDOT has longrange plans to upgrade or eliminate the intersections with NE 42nd and 54th, and while I recall reading similar through the WSDOT site, I've emailed them asking for verification about this. 
In short, based on in-field observation, SR 500 is a freeway (motorway) from I-5 to NE 42nd Ave, expressway(trunk) from NE 42nd Ave to 54th Ave, and freeway again from NE 54th Ave to Fourth Plain Blvd. The freeway segments are built to at least the same standards as along SR 14, which is marked as a motorway.
Baloo Uriza (2015-07-09 13:56:20+00:00): Generally speaking, if there's more than one at-grade intersection, it's a surface expressway in the Oregon/Washington sense (of a freeway with intersections), even if there are fully separated interchanges between intervening intersections.  Motorway would be for situations where it's a one-off or very rare instance for at-grade intersections (like I 80 in Wyoming and Utah, or the Keystone Expressway in Oklahoma).  500 would be a poor fit for motorway as, out of 9 junctions, 3 or 4 of them are at-grade:  That's nearly batting .500 there...
Peter Dobratz (2015-07-29 04:34:02+00:00): Bickenden, where did you get the name "Kerby Ave Ramp"?

The first thing that jumps out is that it goes against the convention of not using abbreviations in street names in OSM.  Generally,all of the various _link roads (such as highway=motorway_link) don't have the name tag.
Bickendan (2015-07-29 21:58:43+00:00): It's local nomenclature for this particular ramp, and the only one to have it. I doubt it's signed as such on inventory tags along the ramp, but I will attempt to field verify this. I do know the BGS signage for this exit on northbound I-405 indicates Kerby Ave, which is where the ramp's name likely comes from.
Peter Dobratz (2015-07-30 04:37:43+00:00): The general convention is to leave the name tag off of the Way object for the highway=motorway_link.  Instead, this same information is put onto the Node where the motorway_link leaves the motorway in the form of highway=motorway_junction with an exit_to tag.  This has already been done for this area on the following Node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/40378782
Peter Dobratz (2015-07-31 05:24:57+00:00): There's some discussion about ramps currently happening on the talk-us email mailing list:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2015-July/015121.html
Peter Dobratz (2015-08-24 00:34:55+00:00): I happened to drive by here today.  As you are exiting I-405 North, there is a sign that says "Kerby Av Exit Only".  After you exit, there is a sign that says "Kerby Ave."  On the way back as you are entering the on-ramp, there is a sign that says "Fremont Br =>".  Based on the wiki documentation and the generally established OSM conventions, I believe it makes sense to remove the "name=Kerby Ave Ramp" tag on these Way objects.
Baloo Uriza (2015-08-24 06:47:24+00:00): no name or Fremont Freeway would be acceptable values for the name to me.  destination=Kerby Avenue is a possible value for the offramp.
Baloo Uriza (2015-08-24 22:59:26+00:00): WA 500 is pretty similar in it's present design and function to Milwaukie Expressway OR 223 and Mount Hood Highway US 26 where it's dual carriage way, or really take a grab at almost any midwestern dual carriageway trunk.  Only real difference is WA 500 is in an urban setting.  People don't expect at grade junctions on a motorway.  Try highway=trunk, proposed=motorway until WSDOT actually upgrades it.

Re: Newberg-Dundee Bypass and the Sunrise Corridor...unless something has changed in the last 3 years, thee would certainly be trunks.  As would be the segment of OR 22 I see someone's retagged as motorway for literally one block between Ellendale Road and Greenwood Road in Rickreall.
Baloo Uriza (2015-08-24 23:19:27+00:00): Basically, the distinction is anything that you're likely to find in the Interstate Freeway System is a motorway.  If there's any substantial deviation from that (lack of median, at-grade intersections, not freeway-like speed limits and similar totally outside the character of a freeway things) on a road that otherwise functions as a freeway, then that would make it a trunk (aka, a surface expressway in ODOT/WSDOT parlance, even if there are some fully grade seperated interchanges and medians, with a high speed limit).

I'm noticing significant priority creep in rural Oregon in general; most of the state roads really don't rise past secondary in nature (especially the windier and/or more rural ones like any of the three-digit ones in the coast range, 66 and 34).  It's kind of silly to suggest that WA 500 is of the same character as I 84, or that OR 411, 180 and 229 are on the same level as US 20 in function, both in theory and practice.
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-11 06:21:29+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33930044
felipeeugenio (2022-09-29 14:51:57+00:00): Hola. Por favor no pegar bosques y potreros a los caminos. Que además de incorrecto, después corregir cualquier cosa es un trabajo tremendo.
gracias
quadero (2022-10-04 12:06:54+00:00): Hola Felipe! Ya oka, evitaré hacerlo a futuro. Saludos!
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-06-26 20:51:33+00:00): I should point out that there are some shorter ways due to the detail of the junctions, and you should take time to double check that you have not missed any ways. Cheers!
literan (2015-06-26 20:35:59+00:00): amenity=place_of_worship не для могил. Надеюсь, это тоже тестовые правки, и вы это удалите сами
literan (2015-06-26 20:59:20+00:00): ворота там уже есть. И тег name здесь ни при чем - он только для названий, имен собственных. Откатываю вашу правку.
peter_james (2015-06-26 19:08:47+00:00): source:survey;Bing
pangoSE (2021-05-25 08:58:46+00:00): hej, minns du vilken typ av shelter detta är?
bild?
Klumbumbus (2015-11-22 14:02:00+00:00): Hi,
bitte verwende nicht name=FIXME. In den name-tag gehört nur der name, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
fixme=name passt da besser.
VG
Klumbumbus
Klumbumbus (2015-11-22 16:07:04+00:00): ...bzw. kann der Name eigentlich ganz weg ohne fixme=name, da es auch ohne fixme=name klar ist, dass der Name fehlt. Siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme

VG
Klumbumbus (2015-06-27 11:52:27+00:00): Hallo, und Willkommen bei OSM.  Du hast verschiedene Namen eingetragen. Was sollen die bedeuten? Geschäfte oder sind das Namen von Personen die dort wohnen. Personenbezogene Daten sind nicht gestattet einzutragen.

VG
Klumbumbus
kleinstwolf (2015-06-28 16:18:34+00:00): Hallo und danke,
war ein ungewollter Abgleich mit einem neuen ipad unserer Wehr.
Danke für den Hinweis
Polarbear (2015-11-06 22:18:14+00:00): Auch im Sumpfbecken bitte keine Render-Tests anlegen. Dafür gibt es Testinstanzen, oder man zieht sich eine Kopie vom Carto-Stylesheet.

In cs 35136538 aufgeräumt.
Rogehm (2015-11-06 22:28:58+00:00): Find ich jetzt nicht so gut, lass mir doch bitte mein kleines Test-  und Experimentierfeld. Interessiert doch hier eh keinen. Was soll das?
Sonst entwickle ich das natural tagging nicht weiter und mache keine neue Vorschläge!
Rogehm (2015-11-06 22:39:31+00:00): So nicht!  Du bist im Begriff, mir den Spaß an der OSM total zu vergraulen. Eigentlich sollte man auch Experimente gönnen lassen, auch ohne Wiki-Beschreibung.
Vincent de Phily (2015-07-06 10:28:02+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/391936
Monitor (2015-06-30 09:48:08+00:00): Добрый день. Будь аккуратны при правке карты. После Вашей работы несколько дорог в Воротынце повисли в воздухе (например http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331880195  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356962289). Name улицы должен начинаться с "улица" а не "У". И.п. не торопитесь делать много исправлений, делать меньше, но правильно. Будут вопросы спрашивайте.
naoliv (2015-06-27 02:31:30+00:00): Werner, essa proposta já foi discutida em algum lugar?
Tem coisa desnecessária nela. Por exemplo, país, latitude e longitude podem ser obtidos diretamente do objeto.
Repare no seguinte problema: no OSM o objeto está na latitude  -22.0072411 enquanto a sua tag tem o valor -22.0072405
Quando há diferença, qual a pessoa vai utilizar?
Mesmo se for igual, gera duplicidade.
Também não acho correto passar a adicionar objetos utilizando propostas, antes dela ser discutida e aprovada.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-26 22:33:52+00:00): Kolego, mógłbyś tak ciulowo nie mapować?
Tworzysz jakieś zdublowane drogi, robisz niestyki... To nie jest akceptowalna jakość.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-26 22:36:37+00:00): Poza tym, brak opisu changesetu, brak podanego źródła danych. Prawdopodobnie Twoje zmiany zostaną wycofane.
zool (2015-06-27 10:08:15+00:00): Please excuse my writing in English. What is the source of this data? Is it from personal survey, or from some unknown source?  

Please can you use descriptive comments in your changesets, so others can tell what is going on, and also attribute the data sources that you are using while contributing to OSM? 

Otherwise, as this is duplicate data from unknown sources, we at the Data Working Group may have to roll back (revert) your contributions to the map.
radmar (2015-06-27 11:03:26+00:00): User szymon_m don't answer of any messages sent to him. His editions contains road which are not occur in the real world. I walk on these terrains every week and I have many evidences on that. Please lock this user and revert his chngesets immediately.
JasonWoof (2015-06-28 02:12:50+00:00): this changset (only) adds lanes=2 to a crosswalk...
JasonWoof (2015-06-28 02:14:01+00:00): also, the way it's crossing is only one lane
Ernie Tam (2015-07-17 22:46:47+00:00): Thanks Jason. I removed the lanes=2 from the node, and add lanes=1 to the crossing.
JasonWoof (2015-07-18 13:24:17+00:00): Bravo! Thanks :)
alphensebezorger (2016-05-16 18:12:42+00:00): Hallo DTeelde,
als ik het goed uitgezocht heb, zijn in deze changeset de straten Langbroek, Driebergendijk (twee ways) en een deel van de Smeerveensedijk van naam veranderd naar Vossegatsweg. Dat lijkt mij een vergissing gezien de adressen van de panden daar. Mag dit teruggedraaid worden? (Ik heb geen lokale kennis, maar las toevallig deze note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/566919)
alphensebezorger (2016-05-29 09:14:04+00:00): Omdat er geen antwoord kwam op mijn eerdere reactie, heb ik NWB wegen bekeken. Daarin staan de eerdere straatnamen. Daarom heb ik die straatnamen weer aan de wegen gehangen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39637578). Als de naamswijziging niet onjuist/per ongeluk was, laat het dan weten. Dan draai ik mijn wijzigingenset weer terug.
ViriatoLusitano (2015-06-28 13:31:32+00:00): Hello 4rch, thanks for taking notice on Olivença.

The truth is that I've added this disputed territory to Portugal after starting a discussion about administrative limits some months ago at the Spanish mailing list.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-es/2015-April/013060.html

I've followed other OSM examples of territorial disputes like Arunachal Pradesh and Abyei

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150455336

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136107213

So I thought I could apply the same methodology in this case.
4rch (2015-06-29 09:05:54+00:00): Hello ViriatoLusitano,

See also my comment here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31909873

it’s hard to compare different disputed areas as there are always different parameters.
 
Regarding Arunachal Pradesh: Indie and China do not overlap in this area as it’s clear who actually controls the area.
Regarding Abyei: Yes, South Sudan and Sudan do overlap in this area because it is/was? unclear who controls the area and there are/were? ongoing fights since/in? 2011. This case should be revised and the overlap between both countries should be dissolved as soon as it is clear who controls the area.

I’d like to point to the OSMF guidelines (chapter "borders and boundaries"): http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf

For Olivença it is clear that Spain has the physical control over this area so there shouldn’t be any overlap between both countries as this wouldn't reflect the reality on the ground.
smaprs (2015-06-27 13:11:45+00:00): Oi Fernando, este trecho http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324909129 da rota seria Canoas ou Guaíba?
ftrebien (2015-06-27 14:43:33+00:00): Guaíba. Já corrigi, estava errado em todas as rotas - há bastante tempo. :P
Peilscheibe (2015-06-30 10:54:49+00:00): Was ist denn hier passiert? (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=32236004) Ein Arzt mitten auf dem Fußgängerüberweg? Dazu die Straße krumm? Kannst Du das bitte nochmal überarbeiten?
archie (2015-06-27 11:31:42+00:00): Hej fletcher86, du måste förutom att dra linjer runt öarna även tagga dem. Dessutom måste de införas i multipolygon för att synas. Läs i wikihelpen. Där finns bra exempel.
XaMi (2015-07-19 22:34:44+00:00): Warum wurde mit diesem Änderungssatz der Punkt mit der früheren Adresse des Gebäudes entfernt? (Die Beschreibung des Änderungssatzes bezieht sich offenbar auf etwas ganz anderes)
Das Gebäude hatte früher die Adresse Delrather Straße 2 und der note-tag wies auch darauf hin, daß es sich um die frühere Adresse handelte. Da es durchaus möglich ist, daß jemand noch nach der alten Adresse sucht, macht diese als zusätzliches Info durchaus Sinn.
Brian@Brea (2015-06-28 07:53:27+00:00): test comment.