piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ScottNelson (2024-03-13 16:12:08+00:00): sac_scale=hiking- was a typo - thanks for catching it and checking in with me.  I fixed in in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148601481

As for my comment about not having done all the trails - I mean this as an explanation for why I did not tag all the trails as I only tagged trails that I have hiked personally (at the time).  There are still trails on burnaby mountain without a sac_scale tag
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-15 17:21:24+00:00): oh, then I misunderstood your comment and thought that you meant opposite!

and thanks for a fix!
user_5359 (2022-06-03 13:08:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database. Stop trying to use the API without reading the wiki. I have cleanup the database!
Palolo (2022-05-01 19:15:38+00:00): Thanks for helping with this project, your contributions make a difference.
silversurfer83 (2022-04-25 15:02:41+00:00): Hallo Jens,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass viele deiner Änderungen keinen Kommentar beinhalten, du jedoch schon so fortgeschritten scheinst, dass du JOSM benutzt. Da ich mir in meinem Umkreis immer die Änderungen ansehe, ist es (nicht nur für mich) sehr hilfreich, wenn die "Kolleginnen und Kollegen" auch aussagekräftige Kommentare an ihre Änderungen packen. Hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments findest du dazu hilfreiche Hinweise.

Grüße und weiter frohes Mappen :)
silversurfer83
ovruni (2022-04-24 17:37:50+00:00): Hola, le he estado escribiendo sobre sus conjuntos de cambios, pero parece que ha continuado, por lo que los he revertido, de continuar con estas ediciones voy a considerarlas como un intento de vandalismo [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Vandalismo
ovruni (2022-04-24 17:41:47+00:00): Hola, le he estado escribiendo sobre sus conjuntos de cambios, pero parece que ha continuado, de continuar con estas ediciones voy a considerarlas como un intento de vandalismo [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Vandalismo
Herman Lee (2022-04-25 01:10:14+00:00): 似乎您可以写一个更合适的评论。。。
canfe (2026-05-05 07:04:37+00:00): way 1054486729
è un building passage.
user_2066394 (2022-04-25 10:13:14+00:00): In der Bearbeitung kam gar kein Rollstuhl vor, du hast verssehentlich eine Baumreihe verzogen, ist wieder korrigiert.
dave_in_ag (2022-04-24 18:56:34+00:00): Is the station south of the freeway really called Am Pm now?  I thought Am Pm was just the convenience store attached to an Arco station.
aidworker (2022-12-18 09:43:51+00:00): Ποια είναι η πηγή του site που παραθέσατε;
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Larmax (2022-04-24 19:31:10+00:00): Hei, OSMissa tulisi olla kohde lisättynä vain yhden kerran, eli siis koulun nimi tulisi vain olla sitä ympäröivällä alueella eikä sen lisäksi myös rakennuksella/rakennuksilla. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
sanch3z (2022-04-28 21:43:36+00:00): Hallo JensOlaf,
bitte sei bei deien zukünftigen Bearbeitungen vorsichtiger damit, welche Knoten du verschiebst. Danke!
JensOlaf (2022-04-30 17:46:26+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Es war nicht meine Absicht, Knoten zu verschieben, sondern Zugehörigkeiten zu Relationen zu ändern. Wie kann ich genauer erkennen, was ich falsch gemacht habe?
sanch3z (2022-04-30 21:37:23+00:00): Um ehrlich zu sein, hätte dir das bereits in iD auffallen müssen. Hier kannst du dir diesen Änderungssatz nochmal visualisiert ansehen (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120134864&relations=true). Zu erkennen ist, dass du die Kreuzung des Zugangswegs vom Schloßberg zur Klosterstraße auf den Weg "Am Bootshafen" verschoben hast. Das gleiche ist mit einem Knoten der Lübecker Straße passiert. Außerdem hattest du eine Bushaltestelle vom "Plön ZOB" auf das Gleis an der Küste verschoben. Was du letztendlich iD falsch gemacht hast, kann ich dir auch nicht sagen, da ich einen anderen Editor nutze. Die sonstigen Änderungen an den Relationen haben, soweit ich das beurteilen kann, gepasst
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
MxxCon (2022-04-24 21:09:39+00:00): Instead of changing the name, you should've add it as alternative name tag as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names.
It's better to add new information rather than delete existing one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120135246
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
MxxCon (2022-04-24 21:16:41+00:00): This business changed their name but kept the same website address?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120135365
ovruni (2022-04-24 19:00:08+00:00): Hola, le he estado escribiendo sobre sus conjuntos de cambios, pero parece que ha continuado, por lo que los he revertido, de continuar con estas ediciones voy a considerarlas como un intento de vandalismo [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Vandalismo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-04-25 00:51:24+00:00): Hi Mlynch23,

Thanks for your additions to the map and welcome to OSM!

A couple of quick hints based on your recent edits:

The name tag should only be used for actual names of things, not descriptions.

Additionally, sidewalk tagging should only be applied to sidewalks (paths that run alongside roads) other paths can just be tagged as footways, paths or cycleways as appropriate.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Sylvain M (2022-05-10 14:02:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Les chemins https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054510684 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054510685 semblent en doublon.
Par ailleurs, c'est une place piétonne, donc pas des "voies de parking".
Comme vous avez créé ces chemins, et qu'ils sont membre de la relation "De Paris au Mont-Saint-Michel", je préfère vous laisser corriger pour ne pas mettre le bazar dans la relation.
Merci à vous :)
Neitag61 (2022-05-10 15:55:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci d'avoir relevé cette erreur
J'ai rectifié

Cordialement
Sylvain M (2022-05-10 17:37:15+00:00): Merci pour la correction :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
eggie (2022-04-26 18:49:29+00:00): Dag Vincent  Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke..  Je zou ook de landuse kunnen intekenen en de tagging op een node kunnen zetten. 

MVG
eggie
user_10097316 (2022-04-26 18:58:40+00:00): Bedankt Eggie. Ik wil in de nabije toekomst als ik er fysiek ben geweest sowieso wat toevoegingen maken. Er lijken namelijk wat gebouwen nog te missen buiten dit eiland. De landuse zal ik dan meteen goed zetten, aangezien het dus eigenlijk verder loopt dan het nu is.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
MxxCon (2022-04-24 22:42:20+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag this segment as stairs? Satellite and streetview imagery shows there are no steps or stairs at all...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120137201
nitsuj115 (2022-04-25 20:11:21+00:00): My bad, I was mistaken for the stairs located to the southwest, inside the park.  I will revert my changes.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_5359 (2022-04-27 13:12:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9690468167. What is the meaning of the tag Grzybki = Putka ?
WoodWoseWulf (2022-04-25 00:55:57+00:00): Hi Maggie!

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your recent additons!

Please be aware that sidewalk tagging should only be applied to paths that run alongside roads. Other paths, footways and cycleways do not require sidewalk tagging.

If you're drawing traversable features with a fork, you need to use two different lines (ways) rather than running a single line back over itself.

There are also limits to what we should add in private backyards, the following OSM wiki page gives more details:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_2066394 (2022-04-25 09:27:29+00:00): Wo befindet sich der Laden im Gebäude? Im gesamten Gebäude oder in einem Ladenlokal?
Ab-Und-Zu-Mapper (2022-04-25 19:48:06+00:00): In einem Ladenlokal im Erdgeschoss.
user_2066394 (2022-04-25 20:25:55+00:00): Da wäre es fast sinnvoll, den Laden auf einen einzelnen Knoten einzutragen und an die korrekte Stelle zu verschieben, ggf. noch level=0 und entrance=* ergänzen.
Ab-Und-Zu-Mapper (2022-04-25 20:32:04+00:00): Poah - von der Idee her kann ich nachvollziehen, was Du meinst aber Umsetzung 8O
Also einen Punkt vom Typ Eingang in die Struktur zu machen... OK... aber wie kommt der Laden dann da ran?
user_2066394 (2022-04-25 22:56:33+00:00): Ich hab den Laden mal mittig skizziert, kann man dann noch an die richtige Stelle verschieben.
skorasaurus (2022-08-29 14:31:26+00:00): hi, thanks for your prolific edits; but I'm confused why you had made separate POIs for pharmacies in my area; for example, you had created a separate POI for both of these walgreens  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100053374
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9690485074
maxerickson (2022-08-29 15:59:14+00:00): There's not another established way to capture the separate opening hours and things like the drive through (where places may sell a couple non pharmacy items in addition to prescriptions through the window but certainly not anything from the store).
Allison P (2022-08-29 16:58:49+00:00): I believe it is normal to tag the pharmacy in addition to the drug store. I've seen this many times.
LateNightTone (2026-01-24 13:58:24+00:00): Sorry, this is a bit of an old edit to call up. Are you sure this is an NI Water pumping station? As there's no signage around it, and it looks like the whole area is just a large farmyard, so I think these are storage tanks for slurry and/or an anaerobic digester.
VictorIE (2026-01-24 14:35:12+00:00): You have a good point. 

However, it does look a lot more sophisticated than the typical farm-based anaerobic digester.

I have no knowledge of the actual site.
LateNightTone (2026-01-24 15:51:10+00:00): Ah, fair enough – I thought you might have been working from an external NI Water source, a list or something. I'm inclined to remove the pumping station area, as there's no NI Water signage (invariably the case at their sites), and any signage that is visible is in the same branding as the estate/farm signs. So it seems the entire area is part of a farming enterprise at least. Is that ok with you?
user_5359 (2022-04-27 13:23:49+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir nochmal https://www.osm.org/node/170643648 an. Was ist die Bedeutung von buggy=yes? Meinst Du eventuell stroller=yes?
tscheche (2022-05-01 14:31:05+00:00): ja, das meine ich.
Danke für den Hinweis.
Leo Slager (2022-04-24 22:20:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
mkopinsky (2023-08-29 15:30:39+00:00): East Avenue N is between East Avenue M and East Avenue O. Expanding N to North wasn't correct. I'll revert soon.
wcedmisten (2023-08-29 15:35:51+00:00): Thank you!
mkopinsky (2023-08-29 17:11:25+00:00): Undone in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140552593
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Skrofler (2022-04-24 20:53:09+00:00): This is a failed edit of mine because I was using the wrong background (aerial). Is there an easy way to undo or revert the whole edit?
AgusQui (2022-08-25 14:38:46+00:00): Líneas 6 y 23 siguen circulando por Tucumán, hace 4 meses que está este error, las dibujaste por Córdoba y no existe ese cambio, por favor antes de hacer un cambio guiandote por noticias debes corroborar que realmente se cumple.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-24 23:32:57+00:00): kms are not places, please, use right tags, I will remove it
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
cyton (2022-04-25 00:06:57+00:00): ich hatte das access=yes absichtlich an den footway=crossing in frohnau dran getan, da drumherum baustelle ist und dieser davon nicht beftroffen ist, egal, dürfte router nicht weiter kümmern.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120138918
ovruni (2022-04-24 21:10:24+00:00): Hola, le he estado escribiendo sobre sus conjuntos de cambios, pero parece que ha continuado, por lo que los he revertido, de continuar con estas ediciones voy a considerarlas como un intento de vandalismo [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Vandalismo
MikeN (2022-04-25 00:21:06+00:00): Hi, Was South Carolina road classification discussed anywhere? Roads probably will need to be aligned with the trending classification elsewhere, but let's get local editors on board first.   We have lost good contributors in the past when someone else comes in with mass reclassification without getting local buy-in first.
Trevor_1 (2022-04-25 00:28:00+00:00): This wasn't really a "mass reclassification", I just changed a few roads to Tertiary.
MikeN (2022-04-25 11:42:01+00:00): I'll let the editors I know who don't follow the mailing lists that systematic changes are coming so that they don't revert them.
Trevor_1 (2022-04-26 00:18:17+00:00): Ok thanks!
porfiriopaiz (2022-04-25 00:54:07+00:00): Hola Samuel,

¿Cuándo creaste la relación para Bello Horizonte 5 usaste las calles existentes y los agregaste a la relación que has creado?

Este tipo de relaciones son nuevas para mí, ¿podrías compartirme una referencia sobre su uso?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14073761

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14073760

Saludos,
Porfirio
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.