piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jordi MF (2023-02-22 12:35:47+00:00): Hola compañeros,
El BOE contiene un error en la cabecera. Por suerte, el redactor no se ha equivocado en el contenido. En el primer artículo se especifica lo siguiente:
"Primero.
Rectificar por cuestiones formales y modificar la inscripción de la denominación del municipio de la Torre d’En Besora por la Torre d’en Besora."
Por lo tanto, el nombre correcto contiene el artículo inicial 'la'. Lo incorrecto era el uso de la mayúscula en el artículo personal. En catalán debe de ir en minúscula. Así pues, devuelvo el nombre a su anterior estado.

Saludos!
Jordi MF
jeslop (2023-02-22 12:41:25+00:00): Gracias por la aclaración Jordi MF, perfecto entonces.

Saludos,

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2022-11-23 09:15:01+00:00): "Added busstop" is even better!
In your comment you should explain what kind of point you added!

„Dodany przystanek autobusowy” jest jeszcze lepszy!
W swoim komentarzu powinieneś wyjaśnić, jaki rodzaj punktu dodałeś!
NorthCrab (2022-11-23 13:16:29+00:00): Witaj, jeśli ten sklep obejmuje cały budynek to informacje o nim powinny być przypisane do budynku a nie do punktu. Punkt używamy gdy dokładna lokalizacja nie jest znana lub gdy w danym budynku jest więcej niż 1 punkt usługowy.

Dodatkowo, proponuję o dodanie prefiksu http:// lub https:// to wartości website. Tak aby podążać za ogólnoprzyjętym standardem.

I już na koniec, shop=yes jest BARDZO małomówne (nie wiadomo co sprzedaje dany sklep). Proponuje o ustawienie czegoś bardziej specyficznego z np. tej listy: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
NorthCrab (2022-11-23 13:17:12+00:00): I jeszcze jedno: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434340126/history z tego budynku usunąłeś informacje że jest to budynek - dlaczego? Jeśli to stało się przypadkiem proszę popraw.
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 05:58:23+00:00): Poprawiłem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129766360
tux67 (2022-11-23 10:53:18+00:00): Hi indumat, 
die Webseite verweist auf eine Waschanlage mit Standort Geilenkirchen.
Woher stammt die Information über einen Standort in Merbeck?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129272005
indumat (2022-11-29 11:13:33+00:00): Das ist ein weiterer Standort. Die Webseite ist wohl noch nicht angepasst. 
https://goo.gl/maps/MRmQvKUDippZ8Ky49
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129272005
tux67 (2022-11-29 11:16:23+00:00): ok, Google ist nämlich keine lizenzrechtlich erlaubte/erwünschte Quelle bei OSM.

Gruß
tux67
eggie (2022-11-23 11:30:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Wanneer je bestaanden Kadaster adresnodes gaat aanpassen zal één adresnode van de kaart verdwijnen en een ander twee keer voorkomen.
Beter dus de info overzetten naar de juiste adresnode. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-11-23 11:34:32+00:00): 'Verdwenen' adresnode hersteld.

MVG
eggie
gurglypipe (2022-11-23 13:05:32+00:00): Hi again, a quick question about this edit: is Rubbybanks Road open to through traffic? Hopefully you know the answer, since you seem to be local. If not, no worries :)

From satellite imagery (I’m not local to Cockermouth) it looks like it’s too small and should probably only be open to destination traffic. If so, it should be tagged as motor_vehicle=destination. Otherwise satnavs might try and route cars from South Street to New Road along it.

The signs indicating this kind of access restriction are https://startsafety.uk/image/catalog/product-photos/signs/post-mount/supplementary/xsupplementary-sign-except-for-access-inline.jpg.pagespeed.ic.gLJ8jk0Yrx.webp

Thanks!
adventuringwithmike (2022-11-23 13:36:28+00:00): Hello, You can drive east down South Street, turn right and head south down Rubbybanks Road, drive under the Victoria Bridge and then turn right onto New Road and head west and vice-versa (if that makes sense) That is how residents along Rubbybanks Road, opposite the river, drive and park at their properties.

The signage you mentioned is present at the junction of South Street and Rubbybanks road.
gurglypipe (2022-11-23 13:40:27+00:00): Thanks, that makes sense. I’ve added the motor_vehicle=destination tagging in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129283070, to correspond to the signage.

That tagging indicates that the road is open to residents, but not open to through traffic, which sounds correct from your description.

Cheers
bxl-forever (2022-11-23 11:57:29+00:00): Hello,

With "gps" I suppose you mean the routing algorithm of an embarked device.

highway=motorway and motorway_link already defaults to no in Belgium (and probably in every European country).  Have you considered reporting the problem upstream?  It might be better than adding tags in OSM to circumvent software bugs.
mentaken (2022-11-23 13:50:43+00:00): I can try to contact Garmin but with my experience from submissions in the past, I doubt they will change their algorithm.
eggie (2022-11-23 11:36:31+00:00): Dag Vincent,  Alle begin is moeilijk , maar deze accesstags zijn default op alle wegen. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-11-23 11:37:29+00:00): De accesstags van de verkeersdeelnemers zijn default.
Groet
eggie
SomeoneElse (2023-11-30 12:10:22+00:00): Did you deliberately use some of the tagging for the lifeboat station here?  Data consumers did use it: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/amenity=lifeboat_station#projects .
SomeoneElse (2023-11-30 12:10:32+00:00): s/use/remove/
Jez Nicholson (2023-11-30 12:49:12+00:00): Nope. Apologies if it affected your app.
SomeoneElse (2023-11-30 15:31:28+00:00): Thanks - I'm guessing iD perhaps did it by accident?
NorthCrab (2022-11-23 13:19:36+00:00): Hello, it looks like there is already a DOZ pharmacy nearby (on the other side of the street). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97985931. Which one is correct?
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 05:59:40+00:00): Removed as a potential duplicate in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129766397
SekeRob (2022-11-23 11:39:21+00:00): Hi,

Grazie per la mappatura

Potresti aggiungere il tag defibrillator:location di questi DEA che ne descrive la posizione, il colore, l'interno/esterno, la marca, ecc.?

Grazie


Thanks for mapping.

Could you add the defibrillator:location tag of these DEA's describing their position, colour, indoor/outdoor, make etc.?
NorthCrab (2022-11-23 13:22:36+00:00): Hello, it looks like there is already a KFC nearby: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7834321840. Are there 2 KFC restaurants or was it added again by accident?
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 06:00:14+00:00): Removed as a potential duplicate in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129766420
gurglypipe (2022-11-23 13:45:30+00:00): Hi again, last changeset I’m going to message on! You’ve dived in a bit at the deep end with some of your changes in Cockermouth, in terms of the subtleties of correct tagging of data, hence the messages.

What was the prompt for changing the primary/secondary/tertiary nature of some of these roads?

The standard tagging in the UK is to use highway=trunk for A-roads with green signs, highway=primary for A-roads with black/white signs, highway=secondary for B-roads and highway=tertiary for C-roads and major streets in towns.

You can find the guidelines here (scroll down the table to the UK entry): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway:International_equivalence

Some of these changes don’t match those guidelines. Have the road classifications changed in Cockermouth, or were you trying to affect traffic routing around town based on local knowledge about where people normally drive, or something like that?

Sorry for all the questions. With road tagging – particularly major road tagging – it’s important to get the tagging right, as the data in OpenStreetMap is used by a number of vendors for things like delivery routing, satnav directions, town planning, etc. It’s not just used to create the map image you see on openstreetmap.org!
gurglypipe (2022-11-28 11:09:16+00:00): I’ve changed the classifications a bit in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129471578
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:13:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10211687196/history has shop = boutique that was added in this edit
shop=boutique? Is it shop selling clothes? Then maybe shop=clothes would fit well, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=clothes

Or maybe shop=fashion_accessories ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fashion_accessories ) would fit better? Or shop=bag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bag ) ?

Or is it some completely different type of shop, with tag used as "boutique" is French word for shop? In such case see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for some documented values.

For shop=boutique info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=boutique page
jothishbabu (2022-11-29 13:12:58+00:00): Why are you marking service road as oneway ??

858285212
immavasa (2022-11-23 10:15:15+00:00): Hi, I modified the road before based on driver feedback but with no proper sources, I have made few changes in the changeset. Apologies for the incorrect edit. If you are going through the location please provide us more sources to make the changes else please do it from your end. Thanks in advance, always happy to learn more from you. 
Regards, immavasa
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:47:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2022-11-23 11:43:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
bxl-forever (2022-11-23 12:00:07+00:00): Hello,

I know those are presumably test edits and I hope you will revert or fix them.

For instance, name="Chemin gravier" is incorrect data.  Use description:fr if you want to describe it in plain words, but please do not fill the name tag unless a path has an official name.
eggie (2022-11-23 12:08:25+00:00): Dag Drbadvines 
Je vraagt feedback..

Dit is niet de manier om wegen die in ondehoud zijn te taggen.
access=no blijft dan gewoon doorwerken in routing apps tot de volgende update en dat kan na vele maande zijn.
Voor korte termijn beter geen afsluiting of anders om de juiste wijze met access=conditional = no @ ()tagging.
Een voorbeeld 
motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (2022 Nov 23-2022 Dec 7) 

Na de einddatum staat de brug weer als 'opengesteld'.


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129275226

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-23 12:12:27+00:00): Omdat het hier niet meer routeerde heb ik als bovenstaand aangepast. 

De conditionaltagging kan na de einddatum worden verwijderd.
Geldt dit ook hier voor moped en mofa? Die worden namelijk nu nog steeds gestopt in de routering.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-23 12:23:53+00:00): Volgens publicatie is de einddatum za 17 dec.. Is dat vervoegd?
Jakka (2022-11-24 08:51:57+00:00): nom officiel "verger du point du jour" pense pas
emersonveenstra (2022-11-23 14:41:32+00:00): Hi,

Please pay attention to your changes, you are adding highway=crossing nodes on places where there is no crossing (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10211761043) and you're not adding crossing nodes where the sidewalk crosses the alley. The editor warns you of this when you go to save, please fix these warnings. Thanks!
CasGroenigen (2022-11-23 10:33:50+00:00): Oops accidently also included an edit in Johannesburg, sorry for the way to larga dataset, wasn't on purpose.
bxl-forever (2022-11-23 12:13:51+00:00): There were a few mistakes here.
Fixed by changeset 129277423.

Please no silly name such as "Jardin" on objects.  Names are only if something has an official name (a street, a shop…).  A name is not a description.  Tags are enough to identify the type of object and display it correctly on the map.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116505769
DP24PH (2022-11-29 23:34:56+00:00): Kindly avoid the access=private tag on roadways to prevent clutter, and instead, tag it as access=destination on the entry gate and access=permissive on the exit gate.


DP24
LatrobeValley (2022-12-02 03:55:29+00:00): Hello DP24PH, thank you for reaching out. The OSM Wiki page for access tagging (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) states, under the description for ‘destination’, “Note that ‘access only for residents’ is private.” This area looks like a private residential neighborhood so using the tag access=private seems appropriate to me. What are your thoughts on using access=private tagging for these areas based on that?
DP24PH (2022-12-02 11:27:21+00:00): Upon several instances on my own, access=private is meant for extremely restricted access (with ground-based warning signs - Private Property, No Trespassing* - supplemented by warning messages for the OsmAnd app), and access=destination would be meant only for the final destination on the HOA-controlled roadway and on the entry gate. Currently, OSRM refuses to route into these roadways with access=private tagging.

* - used on airport premises and vacant property lots


DP24
DP24PH (2022-12-02 11:28:37+00:00): ERRATUM: OsmAnd refuses to route into these roadways with access=private tagging (unless switched on by the end-user).
LatrobeValley (2022-12-08 06:49:05+00:00): Thank you for sharing your thoughts. My goal is to follow OSM policy as closely as possible. Considering there is only one gated outlet to enter or exit this neighborhood, we can infer only residents are using these roads, which aligns with how the OSM wiki defines access=private (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate). I agree that the OSMwiki could be more prescriptive for private gated neighborhood tagging. Would it be possible to raise the issue on the Philippines Community Forum to get a consensus and possibly make an update to the wiki page for both access=private and access=destination? Thanks again for your feedback.
eggie (2022-11-23 11:27:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Zou je kunnen uitleggen wat je bedoelt met illegale paden.
Wanneer paden in het veld bestaan mogen ze gewoon op de kaart van OSM.
Wanneer de paden verboden toegang zijn kun je dit aangeven met access=no bv.
Zo te waren ze gemapt als MTB pad.
Hier kun je zien wat je hebt verwijderd.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129276026
De vraag is nu zijn er wel og geen paden en wat is de bedoeling dat er met de 'illegale' paden gaat gebeuern?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-11-23 15:26:35+00:00): reverted by changeset #129286732

We zoeken even uit of je er wel of niet mag fietsen.. Ook op het Voetpad aan de lange Rijn.

Een reactie wordt op prijs gesteld.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-23 16:02:41+00:00): Had ondertussen contact met Martin.
De opmerking op de kaart zag ik pas later. 

Het is oke zo..  
MVG
eggie
Martin Borsje (2022-11-26 12:44:24+00:00): Ik heb contact gehad met Reigi en ben ter plekke wezen kijken; er lopen inderdaad duidelijke paden door het bosgbiedje. Volgens borden van natuurmonumenten mag je alleen op aangeduide paden lopen en niet fietsen; maar wat is 'aangeduid'? Ik heb de paden weer teruggezet met de tag informal=yes en dichtgezet voor fietsers en alle motorverkeer.
eggie (2022-11-26 12:48:27+00:00): Martin Top... en deze keer  niet natgeregend.
Groet..
Eggie
tux67 (2022-11-23 12:08:11+00:00): Hi Olga_Kovalevskaya,

as a local mapper, I can tell you that this change is not correct. This is definitively a pedestrian Area. 
So, please revert your change. Not sure what user feedback you are referring to, but just have a look here: 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=510027173927494

BR
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129276382
Olga_Kovalevskaya (2022-11-23 13:09:18+00:00): Thank you for paying attention to this edit.
tux67 (2022-11-23 15:05:45+00:00): thanks for the rollback
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129276382
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:38:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
MxxCon (2022-11-26 00:51:36+00:00): Hello.
Is this tagging accurate? w420566846 in south-bound direction appears to have 3 regular lanes and 1 left-only lane. So it should be 7 total, 4 forward, 3 back, no?
AlejandroAlba (2023-06-29 19:15:44+00:00): hello! All the mountains and volcanoes that you incorporated in this edition were already in the database. Could you correct so they are not duplicates?
Carto_Graph (2022-11-23 13:02:40+00:00): "Ералаш" - магазин какого типа?
Carto_Graph (2022-11-24 17:56:59+00:00): Всё, увидел заметку
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:42:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Carto'Cité (2022-12-13 12:09:24+00:00): Toujours moi 
J'ai vu que tu avais ajouté le panneau sur cette portion :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116509493
Alors je l'ai ajouté sur les portions suivantes :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381991543
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346011892
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346011893
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389904736
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283936203
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87172392
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389904738
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Nzau (2022-12-13 14:10:06+00:00): Merci Charles, j'avais vu le panneau en voiture mais je ne me rappeler plus du reste du chemin en vélo, mais cela doit effectivement être cela merci !
Bonne journée à toi, Nzau
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:19:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
bxl-forever (2022-11-23 12:01:27+00:00): name=Prairie à chevaux

This is a description, not a real name.  Please remove the name.
rik_ (2022-11-26 13:03:06+00:00): Hi Günthi, kurze Frage: du hast das `smoothness`-Tag in der Zeesener Straße entfernt, ist das Absicht oder Versehen? Viele Grüße, rik

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174638763
jeslop (2022-11-23 16:36:19+00:00): Adrián en gallego es con H, luego el nombre correcto del cabo era el que figuraba anteriormente. Lo recupero.

https://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadri%C3%A1n

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
RaphaelPasloin (2022-12-22 01:13:05+00:00): miscanthus (1116514441, v1)

Le champ name est redondant et non souhaité : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

A vérifier aussi si le nom de la prairie adjacente est correct (lieux dit ? ou la description dans ce cas il faut supprimer le name).
bxl-forever (2022-11-23 12:29:07+00:00): Hello,

building=garage is to be used _exclusively_ for building structures.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116514475

If there is some space to park a car in front of your house, it should not be drawn as a building.  This is fake data and should be erased.

I am trying to investigate your other edits, fixing footpaths and other errors (you seem to have been moving lots of objects by mistake, we’ll have to clean this up now).
E de Wit (2022-11-23 15:16:06+00:00): addr:street=Verlengde Schrans staat al op alle adresnodes en hoeft daardoor niet meer op het gebouw geplaatst te worden.

(Ik neem aan dat deze bewerking is gedaan vanwege routeringsproblemen naar 1 v/d adressen binnen de appartementencomplex?)

-E de Wit
HJGroenVRFR (2022-11-23 15:34:02+00:00): Beste E de Wit,

Ja dat klopt bedankt voor de uitleg 
Het was onduidelijk welk nummer het was 126 of 125 en daar door verwarring . maar als het voldoende is met de adressen helemaal goed. 
Het valt mij wel vaker op dat soms de straatnaam en plaats (gebouw adres) onlogisch is.

Groet,

Hilbert-Jan Groen
literan (2022-11-23 17:17:53+00:00): точку поставили на дорогу. Дорога не может являться особняком
adiatmad (2022-11-28 02:20:09+00:00): Good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=Building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1075036793). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
jeslop (2022-11-23 15:20:20+00:00): Has eliminado la etiqueta amenity=fuel que identifica la gasolinera. ¿Hay alguna razón para ello?. 
La añado de nuevo.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
literan (2022-11-23 17:17:00+00:00): не надо выдуманные названия вносить.

тег name для имен собственных
A67-A67 (2022-11-23 13:52:55+00:00): Hi,
Why do you think this is a pedestrian street? That is incorrect.

The north-south street is a "fietsstraat" until house nr. 4, correct tagging is highway=residential, cyclestreet=yes.

The east-west path is a mandatory cyclepath (traffic sign G11), correct tagging is highway=cycleway, moped=no, mofa=yes.

I've restored the cyclepaths.
Olga_Kovalevskaya (2022-11-23 14:47:17+00:00): Hi, 
A67-A67
Thank you for paying attention to this edit!
maciek-szn (2022-11-23 13:12:30+00:00): Proszę stosować konkretniejsze opisy zestawów zmian.
gscholz (2023-01-03 08:56:32+00:00): Hi VNT974,
this changeset has destroyed a residential area relation by deleting way 132210029:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129282234


I have just fixed this:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1775346/history

Guido
abakus_uploader (2022-11-23 23:32:11+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
NorthCrab (2022-11-24 00:28:31+00:00): ^ czemu u mnie ta wiadomość a nie na https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129272906 … :/