piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
nyampire (2022-04-11 02:05:54+00:00): OSMへようこそ！
編集をレビューしました。いくつかのポイントを削除されているようですが、これらのポイントは、現地で存在を確認した結果、そこに無いことが確認できた、ということでしょうか？
どういった意図なのか、コメントをいただけると嬉しいです。

もし間違って削除してしまった場合、こちらで内容を巻き戻しますのでご連絡ください。
tsukune222 (2022-04-11 04:54:27+00:00): 削除は間違いです。
巻き戻しお願いします
nyampire (2022-04-11 05:18:54+00:00): お返事ありがとうございます。
巻き戻しが完了しました。時間が経つと巻き戻ししづらくなるので、早めにお返事いただけて嬉しいです。

もしまた、なにか編集でわからないことがあったり、やってしまった！と思ったことがあったらご連絡ください。

それでは、Happy Mapping！
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
skyper (2022-04-10 14:29:27+00:00): Hallo Chris
Woher hast Du die Informationen? Auf dem Luftbild von Bing ist nichts zu erkennen und sonst hast Du keine Quelle angegeben. Wie lange soll die Einbahnstraßenregelung denn dauern?

Zusätzlich hat das Aufteilen der Straße mal wieder die Reihenfolge der Mitglieder der Buslinie 4 zerstört. Habe es repariert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119537916) aber das Kontrollieren und Hinterher-Räumen ist echt lästig. Daher bitte ich Dich  alle Route-Relation nach dem Aufteilen mit iD manuell zu kontrollieren oder gleich einen besseren Editor zu verwenden.

Grüße skyper
ChrisFromRV (2022-04-10 14:58:38+00:00): Hi Skyper, sorry das mit den Buslinien. Hatte ich vergessen. Laut schwäbischer Zeitung besteht die Einbahnstraßenregelung für die nächsten Monate. https://www.schwaebische.de/landkreis/landkreis-ravensburg/wangen_artikel,-nach-der-teilsperrung-der-b32-so-klappt-es-auf-den-umleitungsstrecken-rings-um-wangens-altstadt-_arid,11494316.html
mcliquid (2022-04-11 13:32:10+00:00): Zu finden unter: https://www.verkehrsinfo-bw.de/Baustellen?strassen=B32
Stichwort: Instandsetzung Gallusbrücke
Dauer wohl bis 21.10.2022
PT-53 (2022-12-05 11:32:01+00:00): Hallo,
die Gallusbrücke ist seit 21.10.2022 wieder beiseitig befahrbar:
https://www.wangen.de/nachrichtendetails/gallusbruecke-sperrung-endet-zum-wochenende-680

Sperrung in OSM per oneway=yes gelöscht.
Grüße
mcliquid (2022-12-05 11:34:00+00:00): Danke Peter!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Truchin (2022-04-12 15:06:44+00:00): Re,
Pour la rue de la Jussienne, le "motor_vehicule=designated" est quelque peu incompatible avec le statut d'aire piétonne qui interdit les véhicules motorisés sauf desserte interne. Et tu as supprimé la liaison directe avec la rue Etienne Marcel qui peut toujours être utilisée par les cyclistes via la liaison voie pompiers. 
Bonne continuation
Thomas
user_5359 (2022-04-10 07:11:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved different nodes over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I completely reversed your change set.

Please save your work before you change the area.
ivanbranco (2022-04-10 08:04:10+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1492167087/history

you changed this place value from "locality" to a more generic and less precise "yes". Why?
Frans S (2022-04-21 10:38:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.
F: buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119520107
Warin61 (2022-08-13 04:35:04+00:00): The DCS Base Map gives the names to some of these buildings .. and those named would be, for the most part, homesteads
Warin61 (2022-04-10 23:05:12+00:00): Hi,
Please do not change the segment sequence of routes. This changeset broke the India Pacific train routes relations by altering the sequence of segments. That has been corrected.
Warin61 (2022-04-10 23:10:02+00:00): One further remark - the changeset comment "detail" does not say what you are doing. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
richlv (2024-03-22 05:40:07+00:00): Yay, liels paldies par addr:flats pievienošanu :)
tuttiton (2022-04-17 18:00:04+00:00): Does it correspond to reality that East Malcolm X Street (one way part) is disconnected from Aurelius Road?
baumann3141 (2022-04-17 20:30:33+00:00): Hello tuttiton, yes, they removed the connection to Aurelius and blocked the rest of the roadway. I marked the part that is no longer accessible as "no access". This work was done in connection with the railroad overpass bridge replacement.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119520515
tuttiton (2022-04-17 20:36:49+00:00): Hello baumann3141,
ah ok, was mapping in the area around and wondered if something went wrong.
thank you for the fast reply!
Halfdeaf007 (2022-04-21 16:25:45+00:00): Sorry about that what I did. I went and revert the change. Not sure it got fixed! I didn't look to see what the last edit was so I just found out about 12 days ago by someone else.
ElliottPlack (2022-05-02 10:40:20+00:00): Hello again, nice work here. Keep it up. Thank you for your contributions!!
janolezab (2022-04-10 10:55:47+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
zluuzki (2022-04-10 07:34:59+00:00): Good that you are fixing problems, however, you don't have to pay attention to these "outdated tag" warnings on powerlines. It adds only useless tags that pollute the database and add no value. It adds the wikidata item for Georgia Power and especially useless, the wikipedia page for GAPower. The normal operator tag is enough, the additional tags are basically duplications.
(Note that i mapped almost all of these lines)
jleedev (2022-04-12 01:48:40+00:00): All names should be unabbreviated: St → Street

Also, please use words in changeset descriptions, thanks.
gpserror (2022-09-06 16:16:39+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050682243 seems to be very short bike route too, but it overlaps an existing road.  Should all of these cycle route ways actually be put into a bike route relation instead?
Stretch Longfellow (2022-09-06 16:30:03+00:00): I agree with this and your assessment of 1051594775. However, I wasn't the one who mapped these; I think they showed up here because I nudged a node or something for an unrelated edit.
gpserror (2022-09-06 16:37:35+00:00): Ah okay, sorry had to go back to whoever made the version 1's.  will need to find out what's going on here...
gpserror (2022-09-06 17:22:12+00:00): Okay I think I fixed it in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125868279
i2004 (2022-04-11 02:39:55+00:00): te lo saque porque cuando llegue la calle compartida a ese tramo desaparecería el contracarril en principio
AgusQui (2022-04-12 14:13:53+00:00): No entendí, ¿Viste un sector donde ya no existe el contracarril?
i2004 (2022-04-16 02:17:10+00:00): lo que digo es que a partir de que llegue las ciclovías van a dejar de existir los carriles reversibles y van a ser una avenida doble mano común y corriente
i2004 (2022-04-16 02:17:44+00:00): me exprese mal yo quise decir los carriles reversibles y me equivoque con otra cosa
AgusQui (2022-04-17 00:48:22+00:00): Cuando se haga se verá, en OSM se mapean las cosas actuales
user_5359 (2022-04-11 18:13:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050687818. what is the reason that this house has two addresses (I came to this because of the typo)?
cgsm (2022-04-12 08:26:06+00:00): Homes in this community have a "common" address that is the same as the lot number and stored in the addr:* tags.  These are displayed on the exterior of the house and are used by delivery companies, service providers, and others.  They also have a "formal" address (assigned years later by the county) that is stored in the addr2:* tags and used for property taxes, real estate sales, and emergency services.  For full background, see the post in the OSM forum at http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73869.
Truchin (2022-04-12 06:17:30+00:00): Bonjour Hydrel

J'ai l'impression que tu tagues les places de parking comme des parkings : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space

J'ai corrigé quelques erreur de tag, mais probablement pas tout.

Bonne continuation

Thomas
Hydrel (2022-04-12 07:42:26+00:00): Merci, effectivement je ne connaissais pas l'élément comme une surface, je vais corriger mes précédentes erreurs dans les jours qui viennent.
user4816003805 (2022-04-10 16:26:41+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to OSM!
Thanks for adding and updating POIs in Hayes Valley.
There were a couple nodes with addresses you deleted (https://osm.org/node/6726234885 and https://osm.org/node/4624048553), which I undeleted in https://osm.org/changeset/119522718.

When shops are permanently closed or vacant, it's usually better to tag the node as "disused:shop=yes" (see https://osm.org/wiki/Key:disused:shop) rather than delete the node, so we don't lose the address information. Marking shops as vacant this way also allows programs like StreetComplete to later ask people if the vacancy has been filled.
L'imaginaire (2022-07-18 21:56:38+00:00): From what you explained in the YouTube video, I guess this combination of tags is suitable here:

historic=archaeological_site
site_type=megalith
megalith_type=stone_ship

(see historic=archaeological_site
site_type=megalith
megalith_type=stone_ship)

Happy mapping!
VictorIE (2024-03-09 00:09:29+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314866467/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050698606/

Duplicate?
DeBigC (2024-03-09 11:50:04+00:00): Yes, that's what it seems like. Don't have a specific memory of doing it
geow (2022-04-17 15:24:36+00:00): Hallo Gauner3000, willkommen bei OSM und danke für deine ersten Ergänzungen zur Datenbank :-)

2 Kleinigkeiten, die mir aufgefallen sind, aller Anfang ist schwer ;)

Bitte nicht name=* für Beschreibungen verwenden, sondern nur für echte Eigennamen (falls vorhanden) verwenden, mehr dazu hier: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben.E2.86.99

Außerdem sollte ein Wasserfall immer auf einem Knoten des Gewässers sein. Ich hab's geändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9655357918

Noch ein schönes Osterwochenende und viel Spaß mit OSM.

geow

PS: maps.me ist kein empfehlenswerter Editor, schau dir vielleicht mal "Go Map!!" fürs iPhone oder iD für den Browser an.
mueschel (2022-04-15 08:34:56+00:00): Hi,
the keys 'network2' and 'operator2' are not common. 
You can put both names into one tag and separate them with a ';', e.g.

network = ATV;Arriva
Frans S (2022-04-10 08:02:57+00:00): Hello.   Additional to my previous comment.
Your mappings are so poor, oversized, non squared, round instead of rectangular that I decided to revert your mappings on this changeset as well on 119525126
Sorry, but it cost more time to correct all these issues rather than mapping them all over again.
I will check all your mappings on this project and where needed, I will revert them as well.
Best regards and please improve your mapping skills before continuing.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119524844
Frans S (2022-04-10 07:58:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are rather inaccurat accurate and not  in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. (oversized !) Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119525126
Tomas Straupis (2022-04-10 16:58:09+00:00): Kiti irgi sako, ir jau seniai - jau per patį pirmą Lietuvos OSM susitikimą ~2010 metais buvo kalbama, kas yra pvx (tada buvo pdx?) ir kodėl jo tokie keitimai. Tik taip jau yra, kad dažnas vietoj komentavimo prie pakeitimo rašo man ir prašo man reaguoti/komentuoti.

Dėl keitimų. Mes ne susigalvojam kas mėnesį po naują būdą žymėti kažką kažkaip, nes žymėti paprasčiau (ne dėl žymėjimo žymim). Mes turim konkrečius tikslus, ką norim padaryti su žemėlapio duomenimis, ir pagal tai žymime. Ir būtent todėl milijonas skirtingų/nesuderinamų taisyklių/bandymų per visą Lietuvą yra tragedija bet kokiam praktiniam OSM duomenų panaudojimui. Ir susitarimų pakeitimai būna - bet jie daromi aptarus su bendruomene, įvertinus įtaką visiems turimiems/naudojamiems projektams, suderinus vieną variantą. Ir tokie pakeitimai padaromi centralizuotai. Ir toli gražu ne visi jie gaunasi tokie, kokie būtent man patinka.

Lietuvoje pilna nepažymėtų pastatų, upeliukų/griovių - paprasto žymėjimo pilna - ten ir nauda reali, ir susikirsti dėl žymėjimo principų maža tikimybė. Po jų jau galima žiūrėti, kaip žymimi sudėtingesni plotai ir plėsti žymėjimo spektrą.
Keisti esamo žymėjimo taisykles neturint realaus praktinio panaudojimo priežasčių bus žalinga.

Meną iš OSM galima daryti, tik tai daroma ne keičiant duomenis (ar duomenų įvedimo taisykles), o darant savo duomenų transformacijas ir vėliau savo meninius duomenų vaizdavimus, kaip Stamen design ir dar daugybė kitų (https://30daymapchallenge.com/). Bet tai jau ne OSM, o Kartografija ir Visual graphic/design/arts - puikus dalykas, beje.
PovilasDew (2022-04-10 17:27:39+00:00): Pasikeičiau username'ą pvx
į PovilasDew

iš mano inicialų nesigauna geri username'ai, o tuo metu norėjau išlikti anonimiškas, dabar nematau prasmės likti su keistais nick'ais.
Tomas Straupis (2022-04-10 17:58:53+00:00): Puiku. Kai/jei sugalvosi kokią naują mintį - geriausia pasitark, arba talk-lt, arba man asmeniškai. Tada bus galima išvengti bereikalingų duomenų stumdymų pirmyn atgal ir bereikalingų nuotaikų gadinimų visiems. Sėkmės!
Patchanka (2022-04-10 08:08:05+00:00): Relation "sentier du littoral" coupée, une bonne partie du sentier étant interdite définitivement d'accès à cause de l'effondrement de la falaise. Je ne connais pas le nouveau tracé
demon_box (2022-04-21 21:13:26+00:00): un edificio mappato così:
area=yes
building=service
name=Acquedotto
ma stiamo skerzando???
su 3 tags ne hai azzeccato 1... soltanto building=service...
area=yes è inutile ed errato
name=Acquedotto è una descrizione della sua funzione NON il nome proprio di quell'edificio xciò sbagliato anke questo...
ma come si fa dopo anni, a mappare ancora così?? facendo errori da mapper alle prime armi??
o forse dietro il tuo user si celano diversi soggetti??
giuro, non è polemica sterile, mi piacerebbe capire come sia possibile mappare ancora in questo modo.... boh
demon_box (2022-04-21 21:17:16+00:00): ...peraltro dalle ortofoto 2022 di questo edificio non c'è traccia... ulteriore boh.....
gurglypipe (2022-04-11 09:36:45+00:00): Heya. When you’re editing around Ingleborough and the Dales, can you please make sure not to delete the bare_rock=limestone_pavement tagging on areas of limestone pavement?

They are fairly ecologically unique and are unlike other areas of bare rock, so it’s helpful to be able to differentiate them from more ‘ordinary’ bare rock (which also exists in the Dales).

Thanks!
FbrG (2022-04-11 23:32:25+00:00): Hey, I had a look at the wikidata item and I think it was attributed to the wrong building. I fixed it in (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119598577), but you might want to double check.

Cheers
FbrG
mueschel (2022-04-30 11:57:51+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the tag "service_date = 1/04/2022-4/04/2022"? Did this service exist for 4 days only?
em1nk (2022-05-07 09:35:44+00:00): Yes, it was provided for local festival at ''Yenikapı Miting Alanı'' and now discontinued. 

Official site claims all the departures removed: https://iett.istanbul/tr/main/hatlar/R5/YEN%C4%B0KAPI%20MARMARA-YEN%C4%B0KAPI%20ETK%C4%B0NL%C4%B0K%20ALANI-%C4%B0ETT-Otob%C3%BCs-Sefer-Saatleri-ve-Duraklar%C4%B1
mueschel (2022-05-07 09:54:23+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the reply!

Is there a chance that this gets used again? If yes, I'd add start_date and end_date and set the relation to 'disused', if not I suggest to remove the relation altogether.
jpennycook (2022-05-11 10:28:53+00:00): Hello.

When you're next in Spencers Wood, could you have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9296730065/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120831749 please?  I'm surprised that the the kerbs and bollards have been removed and the Croft Road reverted to oneway.

Jon
Frans S (2022-04-10 10:09:27+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please solve the issues mentioned on the issue triangle of iDeditor before uploading your mappings. 
Don't map rectangular buildings as a round building. 
When you see mappings without a proof (trace on imagery) please remove these. Many buildings were destroyed by floods and war.
Best  regards and keep mapping
kartonage (2022-04-11 12:30:02+00:00): Es wäre schon sinnvoll gewesen sich entsprechend hinzusetzen und mehr zu machen als nur "village_green" mal eben so aus der Welt zu schaffen. Es gab einiges an Potenzial (viele differenzierte Flächen, sehr alte Objekte) bei der Aufgabe grundlegend die Qualität der Daten zu verbessern. Bei deinen Änderungen zu der Kampagne hier sorgst du einfach nur für Umtagging. Am Ende müssen die Sachen dann trotzdem nochmal überarbeitet werden, sind nun aber dank dir nun schwieriger zu finden. Top.
eggie (2022-04-10 12:56:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 
Feedback..  oke
Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
abakus_uploader (2022-04-10 22:31:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!