piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
IlBano (2022-03-08 18:12:27+00:00): Ciao,

ti chiederei di prestare maggiore attenzione alla creazione/modifica di relazioni quando fai editing: qui abbiamo due esempi di relazioni di restriction sbagliate perchè composte da solo 2 membri (8365352 e 8365353), ma mi sono già imbattuto precedentemente in altre simili in changeset sempre a tuo nome.
Come regola di "convivenza" nella comunità OSM ti invito anche a usare un commento che sia significativo (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments).

Grazie

IlBano
Milaviy4 (2023-03-09 13:36:32+00:00): Which of these two versions of D535 is going to be build? If ever? I haven't seen any progress on either of them
vojtechzaboril (2023-03-09 13:49:20+00:00): Which location do you mean?
Milaviy4 (2023-03-11 20:10:34+00:00): Ow sorry about that. The size of the edit is probably what's confusing. Anyway: I was asking about the D535 road near Ravča junction on the Highway A1. If you check closely, there are two versions. One edited by you, and one by some other guy. I just want to know, which version is considered to be built. If you still don't understand, go to this location on the map 15/43.2109/17.2669&layers=H and you will see two distinct roads.
vojtechzaboril (2023-03-11 20:18:52+00:00): Hi, I think I just edited the N most point of the proposed road and don't really found out that there is two variants. You can view the history of that was to find the original author.
kartonage (2022-03-02 10:42:05+00:00): Changeset fully reverted due to it being vandalism.
b-jazz (2022-03-06 22:21:37+00:00): The map shows that holes 11 and 13 cross paths when teeing off. This seems a little bit dangerous and I'm wondering if the wrong tees were used for the starting point of one or both tees.
david82 (2022-04-22 21:26:49+00:00): Weg 686629366 (zwischen Panzerringstraße und "am Ehrberg") existiert und ist Teil der Strecke vom Hermannslauf, bitte wiederherstellen.

Siehe auch: 
https://youtu.be/gw4GdQgkFRo?t=591
user_10799485 (2022-04-23 13:11:32+00:00): Moin, da wo am Filmbeginn Einige abkürzen, Die 5 Meter das ist doch kein offizieller Weg.
david82 (2022-04-23 13:27:40+00:00): Nein, das ist kein offizieller Weg, aber ein Weg ist es halt. Er ist das und wird genutzt, folglich gehört er auch in OSM.

Für inoffizielle Wege gibt es https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:informal
kartonage (2022-03-02 10:41:34+00:00): Changeset fully reverted due to it being vandalism.
kartonage (2022-03-02 10:39:53+00:00): Changeset fully reverted due to it being vandalism.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 19:09:56+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 117929285, 117929984, 117931037.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-04 02:07:34+00:00): Please don't tag the whole area as a building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117991586
user_5359 (2022-03-03 07:21:22+00:00): Welchem to OSM (again)! What is the meaning of the tag combination
building=yes
building mapping=NA
?
Baloo Uriza (2022-03-03 03:23:15+00:00): Please stop using abbreviations in names.  "Road" instead of "Rd" is a start...
EZRouting (2022-03-16 14:01:35+00:00): thanks for correcting me! I will modify it now!
Pt873 (2022-03-01 20:36:52+00:00): Olá. Faz alguns dias que a geometria nessa região foi alterada. O correto atualmente é como estava.
dcskobuffs (2022-03-02 22:01:45+00:00): Ei Pt873, obrigado por entrar em contato comigo. O Mapillary que vi nesta área (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-2.5470814704895&lng=-44.266654968262&z=17&pKey=796575724583074&focus=photo) deu suporte às edições que fiz para o way 473228347 e o way 473228348. parece que pode ter havido mudanças recentes nas estradas. Você conhece recursos mais atualizados que eu possa consultar ao editar nesta área?
Em relação à way 1033581703: a etiqueta de sentido único restringe o roteamento da rodovia residential (way 837433861) para a rodovia primary no sentido NW (way 524499861). Isso é intencional?
Obrigado!
Pt873 (2022-03-02 22:46:15+00:00): Olá. Compreendo, como disse antes, a mudança ocorreu há poucos dias. Verifiquei no Mapillary que as imagens são de março de 2021, portanto um pouco desatualizadas. Infelizmente não conheço nenhum outro recurso mais atualizei, fiz a mudança porque moro em São Luís. Quanto à via 1033581703, sim, foi intencional. Nesse cruzamento, não é permitido seguir na direção mencionada (NW), da Avenida Reis Perdigão para a Avenida São Marçal, apenas em direção à Avenida João Pessoa (SW).
Pt873 (2022-03-02 22:47:05+00:00): Corrigindo: direção SE ao invés de SW.
dcskobuffs (2022-03-03 23:24:27+00:00): Obrigado pelas informações e por manter esta área atualizada, feliz mapeamento!
praeteritum (2022-07-03 05:56:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123139378.
user_5359 (2022-03-08 08:48:20+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir mal die Knoten http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6641804701 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9548068127 an. Da ist Dir wohl mit Blatzheim = Siedlung ein Fehler unterlaufen?
Amegaz (2022-03-08 16:40:57+00:00): Hi user_5359,

Da hast Du recht. Das Tag gehört da nicht hin. Werde ich löschen.
Danke für den Hinweis.

Viele Grüße
Amegaz
frosm (2022-07-04 22:39:43+00:00): Bonjour,
lanes=* ne s'utilise pas sur les noeuds mais sur les ways.
Bonne continuation
MxxCon (2022-03-02 04:40:20+00:00): Perhaps add fixme tag to remove construction tags once it's done?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117992640
praeteritum (2022-07-02 23:12:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123135548.
user_5359 (2022-03-12 09:13:05+00:00): Hello! What is  the meaning of the tag building mapping = NA?
user_5359 (2022-03-12 09:13:19+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag building mapping = NA?
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:45:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123067619.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:43:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123067485.
marczoutendijk (2022-03-04 20:44:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5740
Friendly_Ghost (2022-03-02 13:51:04+00:00): Hoi Martin, dankje voor de update :)
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:36:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123067446.
rmikke (2022-03-03 13:30:12+00:00): Apteka w Białopolu przy Hrubieszoeskiej jest nieczynna. Sprawdziłem w Urzędzie Gminy.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-03 23:16:18+00:00): Please don't use the building tag to map other features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117994403
Leo Slager (2022-03-01 22:55:02+00:00): Dag Joelkoch,
Je kunt een adres op de kaart natuurlijk niet veranderen.
De adresnode is en blijft op de Voldersgracht.
Deze changeset wordt teruggedraaid.
Leo Slager (2022-03-01 22:58:06+00:00): Het verhuizen van een winkel betekent dus het verwijderen van de gegevens van de winkel op de Voldersgracht. En het toevoegen van die gegevens op het nieuwe adres.
Ik denk niet dat zoiets kan met deze app.
Ik zie ook dat je nooit eerder ons welkomstbericht hebt gehad.
Ik zal je die separaat toesturen.
Groet
Leo
joelkoch (2022-03-02 08:54:13+00:00): Alright, I wondered whether it would work this way, but now I know. Thanks
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:30:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123067053.
user_5359 (2022-03-03 08:29:08+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1036387090? What is the meaning of the tag Stephan = Scheiber?
BobKelly (2022-03-03 17:31:23+00:00): Hi Georg! Thank you, I deleted this tag. This was a copy-paste error and I must have overlooked it when I uploaded my changeset.
porfiriopaiz (2022-03-13 23:08:42+00:00): Hello BobKelly,

What does "2957ii" as a source mean?

Where I can this source of information? is it public to review? is it compatible with the ODbL?

I hope you are not copying information from not compliant sources.

Regards,

Porfirio
porfiriopaiz (2022-03-13 23:15:01+00:00): Hello BobKelly,

From where did you get the name of this river, which is part of the elements you added/modified on this changeset?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036386977

Could you please least the source that can be used to verify this name?

Otherwise I will have to report you and ask for this changeset to be reverted.

Porfirio
BobKelly (2022-03-13 23:54:38+00:00): Hi Porfirio. This is from an old USGS topo map, they are public domain with a few exceptions (newer than 2009). You find the map here: https://maps.lib.utexas.edu/maps/topo/nicaragua/
porfiriopaiz (2022-03-14 00:14:10+00:00): Hi BobKelly,

Thank you for the quick reply, and for fixing the name in the element listed above.

Thanks for your help on improving the data in Nicaragua and sharing the source used.

Happy Mapping.

Porfirio
BobKelly (2022-03-14 00:48:10+00:00): Thank you. I'm love to collaborate and improve the quality of OSM Nicaragua - we still have a lot to do.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:12:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123067036.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-03 23:13:40+00:00): The line itself shouldn't be tagged, just the relation. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/884335271
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117995958
Dimitar155 (2022-03-19 12:41:53+00:00): Пътеките също ли са премахнати?
Stereo (2022-03-29 05:16:04+00:00): You're famous for adding the two millionth building in Ireland: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%E1%9A%9B%E1%9A%90%E1%9A%8B%E1%9A%90%E1%9A%85%E1%9A%87%E1%9A%90%E1%9A%9C%20%F0%9F%8F%B3%EF%B8%8F%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8C%88/diary/398897
Boggedy (2022-05-15 19:34:24+00:00): @Stereo I am infamous you mean.
Famlam (2022-03-01 22:29:33+00:00): & bron survey (op basis van genoemde belachelijke navigatieinstructies :P )
Mashin (2022-03-02 03:53:45+00:00): Hi zzmzzm,
the path really there. Just take a stroll through the park.
Xevi (2022-03-03 17:44:38+00:00): Si el camí esta tancat s'ha d'indicar amb el camp access
Glassman (2022-03-03 00:47:08+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117997117
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:11:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123067023.
SekeRob (2022-03-02 13:33:42+00:00): Hi,

18 warnings of unconnected ways in this change set. ALSO, the 'forest' relation role tags on the grassland around Caspoggio should be 'outer' as it is not 360 degrees uninterruptedly circled by the forest. The grassland corridor to Lanzada breaks the 360 situation.

cheers
astraspera (2022-03-02 14:11:44+00:00): Thank you,
as you suggested, I fixed it.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:09:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123067012.
Leo Slager (2022-03-01 23:33:35+00:00): review:
De laanstraat sluit niet aan op de kruising. Ik heb de ligging aangepast aan de hand van de kadasterkaart en de foto's.
Het eenrichtingsverkeer geldt niet voor fietsers en bromfietsers.
Dus taggen we ook nog:
oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:mofa=no
oneway:moped=no

ik pas het even aan.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:09:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066996.
szydzio (2022-03-10 11:50:33+00:00): Adres dla obiektu w Nowym Tomyślu wydaje się być nieprawidłowy => https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9548401525. W/g strony https://www.rckik.poznan.pl/oddzialy_terenowe jest to Sienkiewicza 7, a nie 7a i również ten adres wydaje się nieprawidłowy, bo w ewidencji gminnej Szpital ma adresy Sienkiewicza od 1 do 3 => https://polska.e-mapa.net?userview=50808
ptarac (2022-03-10 16:57:27+00:00): Dziękuję za zwrócenie uwagi. Postaram się to jak najszybciej wyjaśnić i odpisać.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:07:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066977.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:06:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066963.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:05:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066897.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 04:01:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066841.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 03:58:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066819.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 03:55:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066756.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 03:49:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066690.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 03:47:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066670.
tastrax (2022-03-08 03:55:27+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 09:21:00+00:00): Hi Evan,

Not sure exactly what happened here with Dogtopia--seems like you removed the apparently correct tag, amenity=animal_boarding (which virtually all the other non-SEO-spam Dogtopias were correctly tagged with), and tagged it as a general store (shop=general) instead? As well as adding to name=* parenthetical description that is not any part of the name of the place, and instead belongs in description=*?

I went ahead and fixed these issues in changeset 184007116 , as well as added the the useful animal_boarding=dog tag, moved the full name to official_name=* (keeping name=* as just Dogtopia, the common name of the place) and added the appropriate brand=* tags.

https://osm.org/changeset/184007116
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-12 09:22:27+00:00): (And also moved the branch name to the appropriate branch=* tag.)
praeteritum (2022-07-01 03:46:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066662.
praeteritum (2022-07-01 03:45:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066657.
CENTSOARER (2022-03-09 18:44:16+00:00): De ser posible, mantenga sus ediciones en calles que no tienen etiquetados los nombres o no están digitalizadas. Vea mi otro comentario al respecto.
PlinyTheYoungest (2022-03-09 21:42:06+00:00): I appreciate you reaching out. I am working to improve the data in OSM by adding missing geometry and adding names verified through the INEGI on the ground project. I see your traces, but they are south of where I have been editing and match what is current. Unfortunately, there is not ground imagery available, but I utilize all satellite imageries as well as Strava to verify my work.

Le agradezco que se comunique. Estoy trabajando para mejorar los datos en OSM agregando geometría faltante y agregando nombres verificados a través del proyecto INEGI en el terreno. Veo sus rastros, pero están al sur de donde he estado editando y coinciden con lo que es actual. Desafortunadamente, no hay imágenes terrestres disponibles, pero utilizo todas las imágenes satelitales, así como Strava, para verificar mi trabajo.
okwithmydecay (2022-03-06 13:57:16+00:00): Has the deleted relation for the State Library of New South Wales been replaced with anything? At the moment I can't see anything tagged with amenity=library so this needs to be applied to the buildings or a new relation created
Warin61 (2022-03-07 07:00:37+00:00): opps...
praeteritum (2022-07-01 03:45:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123066646.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-03 22:55:40+00:00): Driveways should connect to the road
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117999773
topius (2022-03-02 08:57:10+00:00): Hi DDPION, 

Not every dirt road is an "unmaintained track". The tag "unmaintained track" should only be used for roads for agricultural or forestry purposes. Access roads to houses should be tagged as "service roads", residential roads as "residential roads", and then tag the surface as "ground" or "gravel", or whatever the road surface is.
DeBigC (2022-03-02 01:41:32+00:00): From my visit here recently I saw kissing gates, not bollards. As they are a tricky arrangement in a tunnel under the house I deleted the original and re-added them.
tastrax (2022-03-02 23:27:50+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
clay_c (2022-03-05 18:31:00+00:00): Hi Eric,

The way the slip roads are mapped at the intersection of TX 152 and FM 280 seems a little off. Shouldn't they intersect TX 152 closer to where they physically meet the road, rather than where the painted white line ends? I think the lane lines are better recorded by tagging turn:lanes=* etc.
KartoGrapHiti (2022-04-24 21:11:22+00:00): Du hast versehentlich die Friedrich-List-Straße wieder zur Einbahnstraße gemacht, obwohl die Straße seit 2018 keine Einbahnstraße mehr ist. Bitte pass etwas besser auf, dass Du nicht nach alten Mapillary-Bildern Einträge wieder erzeugst, die aus guten Gründen zuvor schon geändert wurden.
Supaplex (2022-03-02 08:06:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1036434297
好像包多棟建築進去，而且畫得大小也比實際大
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118001674
Joseph R P (2022-03-02 23:38:44+00:00): Why was this reverted? VA 209 is a primary state route and provides freeway access and should be at least secondary.
miha12 (2022-03-03 02:56:07+00:00): Hi. I agree it is primary state route according to its ref but from importance point of view it provides connectivity only for the local neighborhood and thus classifies as tertiary.
JeroenHoek (2022-03-02 14:37:47+00:00): Wat zijn de criteria hiervoor nu? Warstiens komt op mij wel aardig hamletig over met negen huizen, een kerk, en een boerderij of twee.

Bij een of twee huizen zit je op een isolated_dwelling; daarboven op een hamlet, maar wat hanteren we dan nu als de ondergrens voor village? De bandbreedte voor een hamlet komt zo namelijk wel erg smal over. Hebben we hier iets voor gedocumenteerd?
AndriesWijma (2022-03-02 15:40:36+00:00): Even wat uitleg. Vier jaar geleden heb ik door heel Nederland inwonertallen toegevoegd/bijgewerkt en hier en daar place-tags aangepast. E de Wit reageerde afgelopen januari op mijn omzetting van Warstiens van village naar hamlet. Naar aanleiding daarvan kwamen we in overleg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55790162

Vervolgens heb ik hem systematisch allerlei twijfel- en grensgevallen voorgelegd en laten beoordelen. Ik kan wel instemmen met meer weging voor het historische element voor zover dat nog een doorwerking heeft op de (dorps)structuur van vandaag de dag. Ik was soms te veel op inwonertal en type bebording afgegaan.

Deze wijzigingenset is de eerste van twee waarin voornamelijk hamlets worden omgezet naar villages. Enkele gevallen zijn voor mij/ons nog steeds te twijfelachtig om nu te wijzigen.

Met E de Wit had ik afgesproken om het eerst onderling zoveel mogelijk eens te worden, dan de veranderingen door te voeren en daarna andere mogelijke (regionale) belangstellenden te peilen en proberen betere criteria of richtlijnen te formuleren. Daarbij heb ik jou als eerste kandidaat voor raadpleging genoemd.

Waarom niet vooraf breder overleg? Omdat afbakening van place-tags hoe dan ook subject is, omdat E de Wit verder de enige is die actieve belangstelling heeft getoond, omdat een deel het terugdraaien is van mijn eigen eerdere wijzigingen en de enkele anderen die place-tag hebben aangepast ook niet of weinig hebben beargumenteerd.
En omdat, hoewel ik voorstander ben van overleg en poging tot consensus, wilde voorkomen te verzanden in een lange discussie voor enige actie. 

Daarom eerst deze aanpassingen en dan mogen anderen eventueel beargumenteren waarom het toch weer anders zou moeten.

Het overleg met jou kan nu dus beginnen.
JeroenHoek (2022-03-02 16:15:41+00:00): +1 voor zinloze discussies vermijden. :)

Gezien de comments op die changeset snap ik de keuze om village gelijk te stellen aan plaatsen die ook als dorp benoemd worden. Ik zou alleen wel aanraden om dat op de wiki ergens vast te leggen, of (misschien beter) om het op de nodes zelf met een note:place=* toe te lichten, omdat een mapper nu moeilijk kan zien waarom er voor deze aanpak gekozen is. Dat kan best beknopt en zal voor veel plaatsen ook hetzelfde zinnetje zijn denk ik. Ik vrees dat je zonder op termijn toch mappers krijgt die landelijk puur op basis van population en huizenaantal kijken of place-tags van de verwachting afwijken.

Dat geldt natuurlijk alleen voor dorpen van formaat Warstiens, Vriens, etc. waar het niet direct uit de omvang duidelijk is.
AndriesWijma (2022-03-03 19:34:14+00:00): De tweede wijzigingenset staat hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118067835. Dit herbeoordelingsproject betreft dus alleen Fryslân.

Goed idee om (behalve op de Wiki ook) op de node toelichting te geven, want je vrees deel ik.
EMREOYUN (2022-03-18 18:38:37+00:00): Merhaba, OpenStreetMap'a hoş geldiniz. Harita katkılarınız için öncelikle çok teşekkür ederiz ve ekleyebileceğiniz başka katkılarınız varsa eklemekten çekinmeyin :)
ElliottPlack (2022-03-07 17:16:39+00:00): On a technical note, when mapping sidewalks/crossings, be sure to add a surface for wheel/foot-based routing help. You can simply say paved or unpaved, or something more specific, e.g. asphalt, concrete, wood, etc.
kartonage (2022-03-02 09:58:13+00:00): Changeset fully reverted due to it being vandalism.
kartonage (2022-03-02 09:58:19+00:00): Changeset fully reverted due to it being vandalism.
abakus_uploader (2022-03-02 23:31:11+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-22 11:36:26+00:00): Is this object actually existing with this function?

What is your source?
ToniE (2022-03-02 09:26:07+00:00): Servus,

bzgl. RE59 war de edit schon OK ...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117975341

Es war eine Anpassung der type=route an die Werte des type=route_master.

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/DE-Bahnverkehr-Analysis.diff.html#train_RE59

Hattest du den Mapper von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117975341 auf die Probleme aufmerksam gemacht?

Viele Grüße,
Toni
highflyer74 (2022-03-02 18:00:14+00:00): Moin Toni!

Hier hatte ich vermutlich etwas zu viel Schwung beim Revertieren. Danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit! Ich drehe das zurück.

Hintergrund ist, das der betreffende User leider bei seinen großflächigen Edits (dieser ist klein) massenhaft und ohne Ortskenntnis (Annahme, aber praktisch unmöglich) hunderte von Objekten mit der halbautomatischen "Korrektur" von iD verschlimmbessert und dies der Hauptinhalt seiner Änderungen zu sein scheint.

Hinzukommt, dass er / sie nicht auf Änderungssatzkommentare antwortet.

Ich versuche weiterhin, Kontakt aufzunehmen.

Schönen Abend Dir!