piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
santamariense (2016-11-01 03:37:16+00:00): Não. Não é possível renomear os changesets (conjuntos de modificações).
user_1760129 (2019-08-14 11:50:31+00:00): Ist zwar schon ein paar Jahre her aber woher du deine Ortskenntnis hast, frage ich mich heute noch. Die von dir gemappte Hausdurchfahrt des Kettelerhauses (Schillerstraße 46) hat es nie gegeben. Auch die Durchfahrt nebenan in Nr. 48 ist bzw. war falsch eingezeichnet.
canfe (2020-10-02 07:57:22+00:00): Ricordato di connettere i parcheggi alla rete viaria sennò il router non li raggiungerà mai.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296094338
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 13:40:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296050541/history has BP=11SOA key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
frosm (2024-09-02 07:56:06+00:00): Bonjourm
c'est quoi ref:FR:geofer ?
Morten Lange (2016-10-22 01:39:39+00:00): These changes, (based on misunderstandings it seems)  should have been discussed very thoroughly, and e.g.  the Icelandic osm Wiki pages and the Icelandic Cyclist  Federation should have been consulted.
Morten Lange (2016-10-22 01:43:28+00:00): Far too extensive and non-discriminatory. Breaks  ground truth and routring for cycling.
kreuzschnabel (2019-01-15 06:18:58+00:00): Hallo matjeshering, magst du mal einen Blick auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1650147 werfen? alpine_hiking (anspruchsvolles Bergwandern in ausgesetztem, meist weglosem Gelände) findet man in deutschen Flusslandschaften doch, sagen wir mal, eher selten.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 12:25:48+00:00): Hello!

I know that it is absurdly ancient edit, but maybe you are still mapping in this area...

What you meant by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296151472/history ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)
GerdP (2015-12-25 21:36:12+00:00): Hi there!
Please explain: what is meant with natural=Sewer ?
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296174221
aceman444 (2014-12-12 23:47:01+00:00): Dobry den, takto multipolygonom na dotykajuce sa budovy sa skola neznaci. Staci jeden obdlznik amenity=school okolo celeho uzemia skoly. Pozrite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool .
Ak je to gymnazium, potom amenity=college.
A do 'name' sa nepise vseobecny nazov gymnazium, ale nazov skoly.
Prosim opravte to. Dakujem.
GerdP (2015-11-02 15:42:39+00:00): please review:
I've changed the rarely used highway=courtyard to man_made=courtyard
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35036874
and 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/courtyard
The latter is also not often used, so maybe remove the tag. 
See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
eggie (2019-04-06 15:17:59+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
smaprs (2015-03-03 23:28:44+00:00): Hi, please take a look at these editions: many, many roads are very out of alligment (around a half kilometer to southwest), like in this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=16/12.0259/14.6775. And here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=16/12.4256/14.6315 , all the roads don't fit in the satellite image. It seems all in the changeset is misaligned.
skorasaurus (2015-04-06 23:46:53+00:00): salut, comme tu as choisi a utiliser le 'tag' waterway=wadi pour ce tag? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296236536

Il est préféré qu'on utilise le tag 'waterway=stream et intermittent=yes ou on autre tag. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=wadi?uselang=en-US
anu_smita (2019-07-23 02:57:41+00:00): "Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across these ways between

"way 296272249
way 264890908
way 296272247"

classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-29 13:57:14+00:00): Feel free to downgrade them as residential highways
anu_smita (2019-08-01 01:26:14+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Thanks for spending your valuable time on my concern!

Necessary changes have been done.

Thanks
anu_smita
malenki (2015-01-18 13:53:15+00:00): Interesting brownfield you created near Lake  Tchad. Is there a big international development going on? (See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296301169)
eggie (2025-03-08 21:12:56+00:00): Hoi wvdr

Ik zie dat je nooit een welkomstmail hebt ontvangen. Bij deze Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Namens de OSM Community
tux67 (2019-05-31 12:16:46+00:00): Hi,
hier hat einmal jemand dein Werk  abgerissen und neu gebaut .. Möchtest du dich dem annehmen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70805902#map=19/51.10321/6.49715

Gruß und schönes WE
tux67
tux67 (2019-05-31 15:06:34+00:00): ok, hab's revertet und kommentiert ..
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:41:25+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296329125,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296329130,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296329131,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296329132
have no tags. What are they?
GerdP (2015-10-21 18:25:18+00:00): please help me to understand:
why do you connect nodes with
highway=traffic_signals as with
way 296332286 ?
You used amenity=traffic_signals,
now (after a mass edit) they are all 
highway=traffic_signals, which looks
completely nonsense.
jpennycook (2015-10-21 19:32:26+00:00): Hello.
Amenity=traffic_signals was listed in a wiki article for relating a group of traffic lights, individually tagged with highway=traffic_signals.  I no longer use the relationship and only tag individual lights with the highway tag.
GerdP (2015-10-21 19:37:49+00:00): okay, I think I understand now. The idea
was to show that those traffic signals were
controlled by one logic/computer/whatever.
Do you think that the mass edit which changed them all to highway=traffic_signals
should be reverted or should I simply remove those ways?
I stumbled over them because a lot turned out to be highway=track, probably
an auto-completion problem in JOSM.
jpennycook (2015-10-21 21:44:55+00:00): I stopped using the relationship because of the mass edit - the result made no sense to me either. Yes - the intention was to show a set of traffic lights controlled as a unit.
I tend to stay out of debates, but my opinion is that a relationship is useful, as a route planner should only take one traffic light of a unit into account, but tagging the relationship with highway=traffic_signals, ie the same as the nodes, is confusing or misleading.
GerdP (2015-10-22 03:14:36+00:00): okay, so I think the best is to remove these
wrong highways and review the tagging of the nodes with the traffic_signals tag.
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
which shows solutions for the router problem.
SomeoneElse (2015-10-22 08:32:12+00:00): For info, I've stuck a link to here on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25083701 so that the person who did the mechanical edit is aware of the effects.
Cheers, Andy
GerdP (2015-10-22 08:56:32+00:00): thanks, I did not yet change more of them
as it is really difficult to understand the mapping of traffic_signals without local knowledge.
malenki (2015-01-18 13:54:03+00:00): Interesting brownfield you created here. Is there a big international development going on? (See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296236514)
mueschel (2019-10-05 10:32:07+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way? It has a strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296353124
anderfo (2019-10-05 18:24:58+00:00): agreed, I have corrected it now.
jmapb (2021-05-18 16:40:11+00:00): Hi Russ, I'm wondering about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296376447 which you tagged as a footway. My recollection and gps traces indicate that the GVG (and the FLT/NCT that follow it) goes along River Road for this section, and there's no clear footway between River Road and NY-19A.

This is an old changeset so I know it's a long shot, but I thought I'd check.

Cheer, Jason
RussNelson (2021-05-25 03:43:07+00:00): It's been a while since I bicycled it, but as I recall, there was a footway there. If you have more recent information, then go ahead and change it. Just leave the railbed separate from the trail through that section if you do.
jmapb (2021-05-25 16:17:13+00:00): Thanks! My memories and GPS traces are from the same era as your changeset. It's too narrow there for the traces to be conclusive, and as for the memories... I'll leave it like it is pending further survey.
GS25 (2017-01-29 10:06:59+00:00): Why did you remove the name of the building?
Tungmar (2017-02-01 08:17:39+00:00): As far as I can reconstruct: The building was marked as it is only a hotel but It is a hotel, a mall and maybe more.
So I removed the tags from the building and made two nodes, on as a hotel and on as a mall. 
I think that is more correct and useful.

dabeeo deleted the two nodes I created. Maybe we need a resurvey tho check how it actually is now days.
GS25 (2017-02-01 12:22:08+00:00): Ok.  Well, I think the building should be named for the hotel, and nodes inside for the mall, and Paris Baguette and KFC.
Tungmar (2017-02-01 13:16:24+00:00): The name for the building sounds Ok. But the actuall hotel I would keep in a separate node (whit tourism=hotel).
GS25 (2017-02-02 06:20:24+00:00): I disagree.  What is the purpose of using a node for the hotel?  The building is the hotel, with some other things inside it.  The other things can be nodes inside the building area.
Tungmar (2017-02-02 11:40:24+00:00): Currently the hotel symbol is placed in the middle of the building. If the hotel has its own node, we can point out that the hotel is actually in the north part of the hotel (whit the main entrance in the north-east). The way it is now, I would probably go trough the shopping mall.
Hjart (2015-05-21 05:18:41+00:00): Er den færdig nu?
ThomasA (2015-05-21 07:04:32+00:00): Tilsyneladende ikke. Jeg ved ikke andet end, hvad jeg kan se, men jeg gætter på, at de måske ikke gør mere ved det, før Egnsplanvejen er ved at være færdig.
Hjart (2015-05-21 07:16:08+00:00): Ok, jeg er ikke lokalkendt, men ryddede bare op i området og kunne se denne vej har været tagget som værende under konstruktion i 10 måneder nu. Så det var jo meget tænkelig at den var færdig.
trigpoint (2015-02-02 15:55:23+00:00): What is the source of this changeset, can you point at on the ground evidence?
dudka (2015-02-03 08:29:57+00:00): Source of this changeset is "common knowledge, wikidata, spelling dictionary, etc.". 
On-the-ground rule says about main name tag and not about additional name:** tags. Additional name:** tags can be added based on common knowledge
dpolovinkin (2023-08-09 09:44:07+00:00): Hi! noticed that the mapping of the paths in the Çocuk Eğlence Parkı is really incorrect there, just wanted to say that I'll delete current version there and rewrite it anew. I lived in Manavgat for some time, so a familiar with the place :)
maraf24 (2017-07-09 23:27:32+00:00): Aeroplane, really?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296477329/history
Andrea Musuruane (2018-12-03 15:45:00+00:00): Ciao, in corrispondenza del percorso 296479249, non c'è alcun negozio che vende fiori (shop=florist). Ci sono delle serre di ortaggi.  Ciao, Andrea
mueschel (2017-11-18 13:14:30+00:00): Hallo Theodin,
ich habe ein paar Wegweiser von dir gefunden mit Tags wie "direction:Fellbach=0.6"  - insgesamt 15 Tags.
Würdest du die auf ein gängiges Schema ändern? Wir haben entweder "direction_north" u.ä. oder die umfassenden Relationen mit type=relation_sign.

Gruß, Jan
ivanbranco (2022-12-07 11:48:00+00:00): HI FreedSky,

this relation lacks a type=* value, could you check it out please? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3943165
BushmanK (2015-12-06 19:38:00+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3002967100/ - это не kiosk.
Langlaeufer (2020-10-17 20:24:12+00:00): Gib es eine Quelle für den Namen Jägerweg?
Durko_freemap (2014-11-29 18:58:45+00:00): Zdravim Laci, je naozaj Hlavna ulica v Pribete rozdelena kruhovym objazdom? Ak teda ano, vymazte z tagu highway bud residental alebo unclassified, totizto nemozu tam byt oba, rovnako tak ucinte v nazve krizovatky. Dakujem.
Allison P (2022-01-09 10:50:04+00:00): Seems you added changed highway=path on golf cart paths to highway=track in a Nampa golf course. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231672023/history
GerdP (2015-11-09 07:35:16+00:00): please review: 
some of the roads were deleted
or changed by user albertoq,
I asked for a review but got no reply:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35086990
Maybe you can help?
aceman444 (2015-01-04 14:42:59+00:00): Dobry den, "atm pb" je co? Bankomat Postovej Banky?
wwweg (2017-02-02 19:48:35+00:00): Hallo,
Du gibst bei mehren Datensätzen als Quelle Bayernatlas an. Soweit ich weiß haben wir keine Erlaubnis diesen als Quelle zu nutzen.  Welche Daten hast du aus dem Bayernatlas übernommen? Hast du die Hausnummer vor Ort erfasst oder aus dem Bayernatlas übernommen? 

Viele Grüße,
wwweg
GerdP (2015-11-14 18:32:30+00:00): please review:
what is meant with surface=1 ?
way 296681738,
way 296681740,
way 206075480
olo81 (2021-07-19 18:26:42+00:00): ul: Królewska już występuje w Dąbrowie. Skąd ta nazwa?
olo81 (2021-07-19 18:27:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237749756
Toffic (2021-07-19 20:31:23+00:00): To nie jest oficjalna nazwa tej ulicy. Nazwa ta funkcjonuje tylko wśród pracowników Huty. Jeśli to koliduje, można oczywiście usunąć. Pozdrawiam
Osm1980 (2016-10-08 16:28:46+00:00): سلام محوطه پارک رو مشخص بفرمایید
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-12-08 16:32:29+00:00): Hello, les URL mentionnées pour ces sites sont de la forme http://www.geocameroun.cm/geodesie/site/202.html mais elle sont désormais invalides. Où trouver cette donnée ?
ElliottPlack (2021-11-13 15:55:23+00:00): Hi there, this looks like a nice trail, but it does not have any tags. Is it open now? What is the surface like? I am happy to fix it for ya.
ElliottPlack (2021-11-13 16:02:22+00:00): Here is my attempt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296739416#map=17/44.00194/-70.07515&layers=C
ToniE (2016-01-23 14:11:44+00:00): Hi Filius Martii,
ich hab' das grad beim way 72593998  einen NOTE aufgemacht uns erst jetzt nachgeschaut wie's dazu kam: Du hattest in der Version #3 des Weges vor einem Jahr motorcar und motorcycle=no gesetzt obwohl es ein Parklatz ist. Wie kam es dazu? Kann ich da wirklich nicht parken um einen Spaziergang zu machen?
Gruß,
Toni
gnlpfth (2016-01-23 18:10:33+00:00): Servus,
ich kann es mir nicht erklären nach der Zeit, gab wohl eine Verwechslung mit dem Rettungsweg zur Arena. Das ist ein öffentlicher Parkplatz, da sind diese Tags falsch. 
Gruß,
Chris
DeBigC (2021-07-18 15:04:20+00:00): @VictorIE Can you let me know about the commercial building off Grove Road here, seems to be a backland. I don't see it anymore and there are 7 new houses squeezed in
DeBigC (2021-07-18 15:04:59+00:00): exact location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24623381#map=19/53.39322/-6.28810
VictorIE (2021-07-18 18:48:48+00:00): It was a singles-storey warehouse-style building. I'm not sure if it had any signage. I may have photos.

You can see it on the Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta imagery.
Mauro1985 (2016-05-15 00:37:48+00:00): Alcuni edifici sembrano errati, clamorosamente uniti assieme a gruppi di qualche decina, ad esempio way 296785846 . 
Sono passati due anni, so che non è facile, riesci a capire come mai?
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:17:44+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296786463,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296786465
have no tags. What are they?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:02:30+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746400
jeka p (2016-12-08 19:10:13+00:00): на Окко зона "5"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173921909/history#map=19/49.76686/24.08169
user_630853 (2016-12-08 19:43:39+00:00): Здається так
jeka p (2016-12-09 16:21:43+00:00): виправив. На Mapillary "5"
jeka p (2016-11-13 13:07:32+00:00): Привіт!
а тут (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151864671#map=17/49.77115/24.01436) дійсно 60?
Знак "Львів" починається пізніше, а "Солонка" була ще за об'їзною.
Polarbear (2017-02-16 23:16:12+00:00): Lieber Bot45715, ich bin gerade auf eine falsche Postleitzahl gestossen, die du 2014 hier der Neuenhagener Chaussee (L338) gegeben hast. Einerseits frage ich mich, wozu eine offene Landstr ausserhalb von Ortschaften eine PLZ braucht? Dann gehört die vergebene 15366 zu Neuenhagen, das ist ein ganz anderer Ort und sogar in einem anderen Landkreis. 
Wie in https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/27080038 (da nanntest du dich noch Posemuckel) stellt sich wiederum die Frage nach der Quelle der fehlerhaften und auch der möglicherweise richtigen Daten?
Polarbear (2017-02-16 23:17:31+00:00): Link vergessen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77727432
OSM-Bot (2019-10-20 08:33:59+00:00): Danke.
eggie (2019-08-13 06:41:18+00:00): Na lange tijd weer aan het mappen, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-15 06:16:46+00:00): that is an ancient edit, but can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3889453 ?
AriannaL (2024-12-03 02:41:41+00:00): Hey there,
A lot of residential houses you uploaded have names (i.e. Northcott House). Where did you find this information? These aren't the names of the current residents. Is this historic information or archive you can site or provide from which this data was pulled from?

Best,
Arianna
Jonah Adkins (2024-12-03 13:39:30+00:00): hi.
these are historic in most cases, or notable structures the city has were included with the attributes.

https://gis-williamsburg.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/2362f5676aed4055a3a0a03bf359e4b3_0/explore?location=37.282354%2C-76.704407%2C13.65
whammo (2026-04-06 00:00:26+00:00): I had this same question too, so I'm glad I came across this discussion. Just from spot-checking a handful of these houses, none of them are signed with their names and frankly none of them look historic, which makes me think the names are just based off the original owner or something like that. Doing a web search of the names doesn't turn up anything either, at least for the ones I checked. I would propose moving these values to `loc_name=*` or some other secondary tag.
Jonah Adkins (2026-04-17 11:52:21+00:00): sounds good to me
whammo (2026-04-18 12:04:06+00:00): Ok, fixed in changeset/181495274
pangoSE (2019-11-17 17:36:54+00:00): Thanks a lot for this! 
We now got data from a swedish agency that confirms your path and extends it :)
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=WikiProject_Sweden/Open_data/Naturv%C3%A5rdsverket&wteswitched=1#.C3.96versikt_.C3.B6ver_relevanta_NV-data
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-16 11:44:23+00:00): Hej, czemu zmieniłeś nazwę ulicy w tych adresach? http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=2589784253
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-16 15:00:12+00:00): Nie było pytania :-)
mariotomo (2020-02-15 19:58:17+00:00): hi.  you still have any clue, where you found the reference number 1001, in particular while mapping remote?  nobody in Panama dares delete it, but we don't really know if it's correct at all.
syntex (2022-08-09 19:16:26+00:00): Skąd te granice przysiółków?
Graf Westerholt (2017-02-08 07:15:39+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3008136609 Bist du sicher, dass man hier alte Fenstergläser abgeben kann oder meintest du recycling:glass_bottles=yes? Siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=recycling#Materialien
aceman444 (2015-06-15 21:39:44+00:00): Dobry den, odkial ste prosim ziskali nazov tejto budovy "Danubius factory" ? Na webe nevidim ziadnu zmienku.
al-bi (2015-06-17 19:34:10+00:00): zdravím, s najväčšou pravdepodobnosťou podľa kníh (je to už dávnejšie a teraz som busy, pozrem na to do týždňa)
al-bi (2015-07-12 12:43:22+00:00): je to myslím v niektorej z A5-formát knižiek o Bratislave (Obuchová, Ortvay,...)
a tiež o tom písala v dizertačke Veronika Kotrádyová ak sa nemýlim
kuhni74 (2022-10-04 11:52:42+00:00): Wo kann der "Ameiskogel" sein, nach dem der Tunnel und die Höhle offenbar benannt sind?
fkv (2022-10-04 12:30:10+00:00): Die Höhle scheint analog zum Tunnel benannt worden sein (sie wurde beim Bahnbau entdeckt). Nach welchem Ameiskogel der Tunnel benannt ist, weiß ich nicht, aber die Kuppe bei 15.30381/47.88518 wär die erste Verdächtige.
kuhni74 (2022-10-04 13:36:45+00:00): Ich sehe grad in der FJLA und dem FK eine "Ortschaft Ameskogel" (sic!), die sich vom Westrand von Erlaufboden über Gösing bis über die Dachsenwiese hinaus erstreckt, während der gegenständliche Ameiskogeltunnel eher am Ostrand zu liegen scheint. Nordöstlich schließt dann schon die "Ortschaft Brandeben" an, südöstlich die "Ortschaft Langseitenrotte".
kuhni74 (2022-10-06 12:55:58+00:00): Habe den Ameiskogel in der Franzisz. Landesaufnahme gefunden und auf basemap eingetragen.
eggie (2021-02-26 15:07:17+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
trial (2016-12-29 21:24:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Osmose râle avec raison car name et name:fr sont différents. Il faudrait plutôt avec name et alt_name. Je vous/te laisse corriger ne sachant quelle est l'orthographe usuelle (et un name:br ne peut faire de mal).
kapazao (2023-06-25 17:22:15+00:00): Hola, añadiste un paraje llamado "La Loma" cerca a otro ya existente con el mismo nombre. ¿Podrías revisar si son correctos y en caso de duplicidad dejar el más antiguo colocado en el lugar correcto?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1242532677
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3008494732
Un saludo
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 13:46:54+00:00): Please, can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3606072 and help with clenaup of this landuse megamultipolygon?
alejandroscf (2016-05-11 17:06:05+00:00): Hola dalo86,

Veo que has mapeado esto con relaciones turnlanes:turns, ¿hay alguna razón por la que no hayas usado la etiqueta turn:lanes que está mucho más extendida y es menos compleja?

Saludos,
Alejandroscf
dalop (2016-05-19 08:07:12+00:00): Sinceramente ahora no me acuerdo por que, supongo que será por que use algun complemento de josm que lo sacará así
alejandroscf (2016-05-19 23:41:26+00:00): De acuerdo, actualmente da la sensación de que se usa mucho más el otro esquema
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-08-13 09:00:34+00:00): Czy http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297091359 jest poprawnie zaznaczone jako highway=bridleway?
Lola Fox (2025-02-02 12:25:02+00:00): Credo che il nome corretto non sia COLONIUA VARESE ma EX COLONIA VARESE poichè non è più una colonia dai tempi della secodna guerra mondiale.
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:16:37+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297119847,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297119849,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297119850,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297119852
have no tags. What are they?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:01:28+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74565634 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746400
literan (2015-10-28 15:31:35+00:00): Насчет этого здания - есть оно, сам видел неделю назад, и на панорамах имеется http://atlas.mos.ru/?lang=ru&z=8&ll=37.453050577573265%2C55.724329332503466&pp=37.45305942%2C55.72432045&pa=-19.1 - восстанавливаю