piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Peer van Daalen (2019-08-04 09:57:46+00:00): Der Eintrag der früheren Gaststätte war nach Wochen noch immer nicht weg. 
-
Bei der Suche nach dem Grund, habe ich was an der Struktur des Gebäudes kaputt gemacht. Ich glaube, das war was mit einer Relation. 
Hab es nicht mehr hinbekommen und dann neu gezeichnet.
-
In der Regel lasse ich die Finger von Relationen. Sind mit zu hoch.
-
Kann man das wieder reparieren aber ohne den Namen der Gaststätte zurück zu holen?
aixbrick (2019-08-04 11:53:20+00:00): > Der Eintrag der früheren Gaststätte war nach Wochen noch immer nicht weg. 
War mir auch vor einigen Wochen aufgefallen. Ich habe dann über https://www.sammyshp.de/fsmap/ die Kachel als "dirty" markiert (rechtsklick). Nach Neurendering war er weg.
> Kann man das wieder reparieren aber ohne den Namen der Gaststätte zurück zu holen?
Kann ich machen, wenn du willst.
Peer van Daalen (2019-08-04 17:33:06+00:00): " ... die Kachel als "dirty" markiert (rechtsklick) ..."
-
Hab ich nichts von bemerkt. Und diese sammyseite kenne ich  nicht.
-
"Kann ich machen, wenn du willst."
-
Das wäre nett, weil wenn ich anfange, da wieder eine inner-outer-Relation hin zu kritzeln, geht das wohl in die Hose ...
-
Danke | Peer
aixbrick (2019-08-04 19:41:55+00:00): > Und diese sammyseite kenne ich nicht.
Den Link dazu habe ich im Forum irgendwann mal gesehen. Ganz praktisch, wenn man das (Neu-)Rendern forcieren will.

> Das wäre nett,...
Ich habe das mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72997252 rückgängig gemacht. Dabei habe ich https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6680277819 belassen und zum Eingang umgetaggt.
Die Gaststätte ist übrigens definitiv in den Daten weg.
Peer van Daalen (2019-08-04 20:28:14+00:00): Super! Danke Dir!
TravGW (2019-08-04 02:04:33+00:00): A house is not a park.
TravGW (2019-08-04 02:02:42+00:00): Do not make fictitious edits to the map. This is a real world map that people depend on, it is not a game. Uploading fictitious edits is a waste of everyone's time and will not be tolerated.
eggie (2019-08-13 07:18:02+00:00): Beste Hansworst. Neem svp de moeite om je edits te becommentariëren. 
Please comment your edits properly. 
MVG,
Eggie
Hansworst (2019-09-26 19:57:55+00:00): Excuses voor het niet beantwoorden voor de berichten ik edit via een 3e partij app, waardoor ik amper op de osm site kom.

Ik zal voor mijn toekomstige edits comments toepassen.

Ik edit eigenlijk het meeste om de Pokémon Go map te verbeteren.

Gr Wytse v s
eggie (2019-09-26 20:12:40+00:00): Oke.. prima.. bedankt voor je reactie
Gr eggie
abrensch (2019-08-04 10:22:29+00:00): junction=roundabout aber bitte nur zusätzlich. So hast Du den Kreisel gelöscht.

Ich habe das korrigiert.
user_2954791 (2019-08-04 10:25:00+00:00): Ist mir gar nicht aufgefallen, Danke Dir.
TourenbikerFKB (2019-08-04 14:45:14+00:00): da wäre noch etwas, was ältere Eintragungen (nicht von dir) betrifft: die Verkehrsinsel der L 169 sollte man entsprechend 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:traffic_calming mappen und der Fußweg muß gemeinsame nodes mit der Straße haben. Kannst du dich noch darum kümmern?
iWowik (2019-10-17 14:20:57+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, а также вносите адресную информацию.

Обычно номера домов сложно найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы их берете?
iWowik (2019-11-23 15:43:22+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о моем комментарии, поэтому повторю вопрос.
Так всё-таки, откуда вы берете информацию об адресах домиков?
Frans S (2019-08-09 12:41:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark
Do not include the shadow of a building into your mappings. The dark/black spot beneath a building. It indicates whether an object is above ground level or not
Best regards
mariotomo (2019-08-30 21:52:39+00:00): no se ve mucho como área residencial.  por lo menos, no en Bing.
mariotomo (2020-10-17 22:35:23+00:00): tampoco en Esri World Imagery que mencionas como imagery_used.  sí se ve una carretera que le pasa al frente …
eggie (2019-08-03 20:21:53+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode

MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2019-09-23 19:45:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 74820738, 74822879, 74814973, 74824689 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source].
Miselajus (2019-09-11 20:00:27+00:00): Hallo,
du hast in diesen CS einen Downhill-Trail mit Namen Sperkelbach - Trail hinzugefügt. Mich wundert, dass dieser Trailauf der Seite

https://www.spessartbiken.de/spessartbiken/de/startseite/

nirgendwo erwähnt wird. Obwohl dieser Trail ja sehr außergewöhnlich ist: Er verläuft angeblich vollständig (ca. 550 m) über einer Brücke und ist zudem nur schlecht sichtbar und hat eine Breite von 0. Vielleicht kannst du mir aus meiner Unwissenheit heraus helfen.
Gruß M.
Radmaroeder (2019-09-12 12:14:53+00:00): Hallo, wegen der Brücke, ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen. 
Danke für die info.
Der Trail wird nur von Insidern benutzt, deswegen sollte ich ihn wieder rausnehmen.
Miselajus (2019-09-12 19:12:21+00:00): Den Trail wieder herauszunehmen ist nach meiner Ansicht eine sehr gute Idee.
Glassman (2019-08-04 02:32:37+00:00): Do you know what kind of curb, raised, lowered, or flush is at Monroe Street and Gardner Road?
rivermont (2019-08-04 03:11:01+00:00): According to Bing Streetside from 2015, they're lowered without tactile marking. I've updated them as such and hopefully that's correct.
Glassman (2019-08-04 05:14:31+00:00): Thanks - I'm trying to get all of Skagit County into AccessMap.io - right now only Mount Vernon is included.
user_5359 (2019-08-04 04:57:22+00:00): Hello! Please check: Is "Circle Giant Azalea Garden at Greentree Lane" really the name of the object or more a description?
DD1GJ (2019-08-03 21:12:32+00:00): Hallo Christian,

ich habe Deine Änderung zurückgesetzt, da der Wildpark erher den Charakter eines Zoos hat und bereits so erfasst war.

Weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
BCNorwich (2019-08-05 19:08:36+00:00): Hi, I've removed your duplication of the tee.
marc__marc (2021-02-22 15:22:56+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6680496661
pourriez-vous vérifier la position du terrain de boule ? je ne vois rien à l'endroit en question, cela resemble au trottoir menant à l'arrêt de bus, entre la rue et le parking
Adava Pays d'Aix (2021-02-22 15:31:18+00:00): Bonjour, c'est au bon endroit, le POI est au bout du terrain. Je peux le tracer sous forme de surface plutôt qu'un point à la rigueur. (bdortho et esri ne sont pas à jour, il y a que Maxar qui l'est et on devine la surface un peu plus jaune.) J'y passe tous les jours, je m'arrêterai dans la semaine pour bien tout répertorier, il y a des bancs, poubelles, arbres, etc.
BCNorwich (2019-08-05 19:16:57+00:00): Hi Lots of tagging here that is not to OSM practice. Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
joost schouppe (2019-08-05 09:20:45+00:00): nagekeken via https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe-grb:matrix.org
user_5359 (2019-08-19 14:30:51+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Du hast ohne validen Kommentar eine Straße gelöscht. Ich habe mir erlaubt, Deine Änderungen zurückzunehmen. Bitte achte bei den nächsten Änderungen daran, zu prüfen ob Dein Programm das macht, was Du auch wirklich willst.
maro21 (2019-08-09 15:05:47+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tych nazw?
kirma (2019-08-04 06:18:50+00:00): Does this fix the note regarding Heikintori?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1551962
LKajan (2019-08-04 17:55:08+00:00): Partly but not completly. I just deleted few stores that I remember that have quit for sure.
Zsolt Medgyesi (2019-08-08 12:02:53+00:00): Hello,
this changeset contains many duplicate buildings of your previous changeset(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72640550).

Please fix it, or notify me (or someone else) to devise some other solution.
Spush (2019-08-08 15:50:44+00:00): Thank you! I fixed the mistakes. I don't understand, how could I made so many mistakes.
Zsolt Medgyesi (2019-08-09 07:05:29+00:00): Not a big deal, happens sometimes, and its easy to fix.

I just found some duplicate points and ways as well, not much.
(http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/hu/errors/?source=6424&item=1230&class=3)
(http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/hu/errors/?source=6424&item=1230&class=1)

I've seen this kind of mistake before, from people editing with JOSM. If I may suggest to restart (File -> Restart) JOSM, after commiting a changeset to make sure all cached data is cleared.
user_5359 (2019-08-04 04:48:46+00:00): Hello! Is is a public or private sport centre? please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
s_SoNick (2019-08-19 19:13:23+00:00): Okay, I think I've got it now! I'm going to mark the area of the school as well. Thank you!
n76 (2019-08-05 22:47:26+00:00): Your comments refer to the legislation regarding the name. Yet the big change I see on at least a couple of sections is changing from primary to trunk.

You did that in the middle of Dana Point where PCH is signed at 35 MPH and has stop lights every few hundred feet. For the US the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk specifically says "A relatively high-speed divided road (at least 40 MPH with a barrier or median separating each direction of traffic), with a limited amount of intersections and driveways; or a major intercity highway". This road does not meet that standard and the highway classification should be reverted.
Fluffy89502 (2019-08-05 23:07:54+00:00): welp im stupid for missing that ill revert that asap :/.
n76 (2019-08-05 23:13:12+00:00): I've already done it. :)

And along the way, corrected the lanes on Del Prado and added turn lanes, etc.
n76 (2019-08-05 23:17:03+00:00): I can agree that PCH from the north end of Dana Point to Crown Valley could be tagged as trunk. But north of Crown Valley into Laguna Beach is it debatable (lower speed limit, many more stop lights, driveways, cross traffic, etc.)

Not sure if that is the same change set or not, looking at the map on OSM it looks like some reversion is needed along that section.
VictorIE (2024-08-05 18:35:25+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291243586

I'm wondering about access=no

Is it not accessible to anyone, not even staff?
AndrewMcCarthy (2024-08-06 20:16:30+00:00): It's permanently blocked off now; I was there today and have updated the area.
user_5359 (2019-08-04 07:04:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on this three ways: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Ljq, they have all the tag "(new tag)m"="cutline". I assume you mean "man_made"="cutine", but I am not sure.
DF45 (2019-08-04 10:04:33+00:00): Corrected.
I'm interested on how you create the corresponding request in overpass.
So that I check myself.
This is a common error when you heavily use Potlach.
Thanks for your help.
freebeer (2019-08-03 22:36:50+00:00): this is not a meaningful description.  in fact, looking at your edit history for the past days, there are very few edits where your descriptions appear to be sensible.
woodpeck (2020-10-24 09:46:33+00:00): Dear user rdclif, do you know anything about the legal situation of this footpath - is it a properly posted public path, or just a path that everone uses but isn't official, or maybe even a private path through people's backyards? I'm asking becasue DWG has had a complaint from a property owner, but I'd like a second opinion before we make any changes.

Thanks!
Frederik Ramm
OSMF DWG
Ticket #2020102310000195
rdclif (2020-10-25 13:29:34+00:00): Hi, I can confirmed the existence of the trail, and that it’s appearance is that of a public footpath. I have also seen it on older maps of the area. But on review, it has been removed from more current versions of those maps. I have removed it as being part of ‘SW Tails’ and marked it as private.
eggie (2019-08-04 07:02:52+00:00): Welkom bij OSM. De postcode heb ik naar het afgesproken formaat hersteld.
MVG,
Eggie
Mazda05 (2019-08-04 08:37:13+00:00): Нет причин для изменения класса дороги на tertiary и/или unclassified, так как автодорога федерального значения А154 на всём своём протяжении удовлетворяет необходимым требованиям highway=primary по соглашению о классификации автодорог в ВикиПроекте Россия https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification. Цитаты: «highway=primary автомобильные дороги регионального значения, соединяющие крупные города и/или областные центры, дороги межрегионального значения, не являющиеся trunk»
«highway=tertiary более важные автомобильные дороги среди прочих автомобильных дорог местного значения, например соединяющие районные центры с сёлами, а также несколько сёл между собой»
«highway=unclassified остальные автомобильные дороги местного значения, образующие соединительную сеть дорог»
Mazda05 (2019-08-04 08:37:30+00:00): There is no reason to change the class of the road to "highway=tertiary" or "highway=unclassified", since the highway of federal significance A154 throughout its length meets the necessary requirements for "highway=primary" according to the agreement on the classification of roads in OSMWiki Russia https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Quotes: «highway=primary - highways of regional significance connecting major cities and / or regional centers, highways of interregional significance that are not "highway=trunk"»
«highway=tertiary - is more important roads, among other local roads, for example, connecting district centers with villages, as well as several villages among themselves»
«highway=unclassified - other local roads forming the connecting road network»
Mazda05 (2019-08-04 08:37:39+00:00): Согласно OSMWiki, цитата: «Вандализм — это преднамеренное игнорирование принятых норм сообщества OpenStreetMap. Простые недоразумения и ошибки редактирования не являются вандализмом, но они должны быть исправлены с помощью тех же инструментов, которые используются для устранения последствий вандализма.»
С моей стороны отсутствуют признаки преднамеренного игнорирования принятых норм сообщества OSM в виде соглашения о классификации дорог в ВикиПроекте Россия, так как я вам предоставил достаточно аргументов в комментариях к changeset'у #70209510, о том, что: А154 на всём своём протяжении дорога федерального значения; все дороги федерального значения являются в том числе дорогами межрегионального значения, дорогами регионального значения; в описании highway=primary значимость дороги как дорога межрегионального значения является достаточным и не требует обязательной связи дорогой крупных городов и/или областных центров, что является альтернативным фактором для классифицирования дороги как "highway=primary". Остальные аргументы вы можете получить самостоятельно изучив: смысловые значения слов и словосочетаний русского языка в любых словарях; смысловое значение знаков препинания, в частности, запятой «,»; дату принятия, причины и факторы, которые способстововали принятию соглашения о классификации дорог в ВикиПроекте Россия; рекомендации в голосовании по соглашению о классификации дорог и в тексте самой классификации
user_5359 (2019-08-04 04:40:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Streets are also part of a area tagged with landuse=resitential.
pitscheplatsch (2019-08-04 16:17:53+00:00): Hi Julia Kluser, welcome to OSM.

Please use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
Frans S (2019-08-12 15:30:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here. 
Just a short remark. Do not include the shadow of a building in your mapping.
Best regards
rivermont (2019-08-04 02:05:49+00:00): Hi poetixmind, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Is there actually a park here, or is it just a commons area for what looks like a private community?
Also, out of curiosity, are you editing the map to use with a game, like Pokemon Go?
Thanks for contributing!
Will
viloan (2019-08-04 02:02:11+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 07:23:32+00:00): Hello!

You used
network=Lwn
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710509844/history

Have you maybe meant
network=lwn
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-19 20:24:39+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2545310 ?
MacLondon (2019-08-04 11:17:22+00:00): Reverted by changeset 72987308
MacLondon (2019-08-04 11:01:04+00:00): Reverted by changeset 72987040
MacLondon (2019-08-04 10:42:23+00:00): Reverted by changeset 72986734
MacLondon (2019-08-04 10:20:30+00:00): Reverted by changeset 72986348
MacLondon (2019-08-04 10:02:36+00:00): Reverted by changeset 72986082
MacLondon (2019-08-04 09:44:12+00:00): Reverted by changeset 72985780
MacLondon (2019-08-04 09:27:46+00:00): Reverted by changeset 72985516
MacLondon (2019-08-04 09:11:10+00:00): Reverted by changeset 72985177
MacLondon (2019-08-04 08:49:04+00:00): Reverted by changeset 72984701
drolbr (2019-08-04 07:28:25+00:00): Emergency reverted by changeset 72983341
drolbr (2019-08-04 06:36:57+00:00): Emergency reverted by changeset 72982507
Reza Babri (2019-08-04 18:39:05+00:00):  سلام علی آقا!
مسیری که شما براساس جی پی اس از یال شن سیاه به سمت دارآباد رسم کردید قبلا توی نقشه بوده و نباید اضافه میشده. الان دو تا مسیر نزدیک به هم ثبت شده که در واقع یک پاکوب بیشتر نیست. درستش اینه که داده های جی پی 
 اس مختلف رو با هم میانگین گیری کنید و فقط یک مسیر 
بر اون اساس تو نقشه ثبت بشه.
sharifiali (2019-08-05 04:39:08+00:00): سلام
ممنونم از دقتتون
عجب خبطی مرتکب شدم ولی من مسیر سمت راستی رو در نقشه ندیدم.
حالا شما پاکش کردین ؟ یا الان همون رسم منم داخلش هست؟
sharifiali (2019-08-05 04:44:10+00:00): اصلا تصمیم نداشتم دو تا نزدیک به هم رسم کنم و متوجه مسیر ثبت شده نشدم ..
باز هم ممنونم
فقط تصمیم داشتم مسیر شمالی رو ثبت کنم و متوجه برخورد دو مسیر نشدم.
الان به چه صورت پاکش کنم؟
با چنجست امکانش هست؟
sharifiali (2019-08-05 04:53:58+00:00): لطفا یه بررسی بفرمایید ببینید مشکل حل شد؟
Reza Babri (2019-08-05 05:38:45+00:00): بله دست شما درد نکنه. درست شد.
درباره مسیر حاجی آباد به دارآباد هم دو تا نکته وجود  داره. یکی اینکه برای نقطه های مسیر تگ ارتفاع تعریف شده که لزومی نداره. خصوصا اینکه ارتفاع تا چند رقم اعشار هم ثبت شده.
دوم اینکه مسیرهای رفت و برگشت باید جدا از هم ثبت بشن ولی الان بصورت یک لوپ بسته ثبت شده.
به نظرم این دو مسیر باید هم در نقطه قله دارآباد و هم در مبدأ صعود از هم جدا بشن.
ممنون که وقت میذارید. در کل به گمونم بهتره داده های جی پی اس مستقیماً وارد نقشه نشه، بلکه اول آپلود بشه و بعد دستی مسیر ثبت بشه. و بهتره همیشه از چند مسیر جی پی اس استفاده بشه. چون داده ها خطا دارند..
sharifiali (2019-08-07 08:37:39+00:00): سلام و ارادت
میشه البته نقاط دارای اطلاعات ارتفاع رو حذف کرد هر چند که بودنشون شاید مفید باشه.
معمولا دو مسیر جی پی اس روی هم منطبق نیستند ولی خطاها تقریبا مشخص و قابل اصلاح هستند.  ممنون از لطفا شما. یک مسیر با خطای حتی 4-5 متری از بی مسیری می تونه بهتر باشه و کوهنورد رو از گم شدن نجات بده ..هرچند که تا 5 متر خطا ندارن .. باز هم از دانش شما بهره می برم و ممنون میشم موارد رو بفرمایید.
Reza Babri (2019-08-10 04:15:48+00:00): سلام
بله کاملا موافقم
درباره خطای اندازه گیری جی پی اس ها که گقتید فقط بگم که من توی بحث ارتفاع، 20 متر و 30 متر خطا خیلی زیاد دیدم و اونقدرها هم ارتفاع رو دقیق ثبت نمیکنند.

ما از شما بیشتر یاد گرفتیم علی آقا! خصوصا اون سایبونی که برای پایه موبایل درست کردید شاهکار بود.
چاکریم.
sharifiali (2019-08-11 06:54:02+00:00): سلام آقا رضای عزیز و گرامی
در استاد بودن شما شک نیست ..
بله فرمایش شما هم کاملا صحیح هست ..
راستی اون سایه بون هم جواب نداد، مجبور شدم یه ترفند راحت تر بکار ببرم و مشکل خدا رو شکر حل شد و البته اون سایه بون هم کمکی عمل می کنه ..
این ترفند دومی خیلی خوب تر هست ..
Warin61 (2019-08-15 06:39:57+00:00): Hi.
Problem with way 710589362 (roof).
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=144.94203&lat=-37.82109&zoom=17
TuanIfan (2019-08-15 07:51:54+00:00): Hi Warin61,

Thank you. I’ll have a look into that and have it corrected properly.

actually i’m still in a newbie in 3D building “design” and i’m still learning to portray buildings in OSM. Even I had surveys on the site but i still find it too hard to place them ehre
Warin61 (2019-08-15 08:20:51+00:00): 3D... yes .. I've had a go at the Sydney Opera house ... over lapping roof lines are not yet part of OSM 3D. Even milti level 'rooms' are not done well. But it is a start. Unfortunately most of the opera house is off limits to mere mortals so I can only do some of the places.
Warin61 (2019-12-04 07:11:31+00:00): Ok.. 4 months...
I have deleted the crossing section of roof... so some of it will work. Put that on layer=1 because it is on top of the base building?

Building parts can only work on top of a base 'building=*' .. and that base should have the maximum number of floors/levels and height.. not just its own. layers in OSM only go to 5! So I have edited what I think is the base and parts as appropriate. That may help.
ConsEbt (2019-08-07 11:47:36+00:00): Wiki Page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australia_NSW_Property_and_Address_Import
Import Source: https://gitlab.com/dionmoult/osm-nsw-address-import
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
Russ McD (2020-10-01 07:16:55+00:00): Hi,   This is not the way to tag malaria hotspots... if you want to trace a building, then trace the building outline... if you want to mark an area, then tag it as such.  
This is poor sloppy mapping and not in the spirit of OSM.  I will change these myself from building to area unless, which more accurately reflects your outlines.
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
btwhite92 (2019-08-10 17:01:34+00:00): Why were these sections of US 101 changed to motorway? This stretch has countless grade-level intersections (Pesante, Reese, Berta Canyon/Prunedale, etc) that disqualifies is from being a motorway. Please review tagging guidelines!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway

"Grade-separated highway, normally divided with 2 or more lanes in each direction. Access by ramps only."
Wynndale (2019-08-04 06:54:19+00:00): What was wrong with it?
drolbr (2019-08-04 07:34:50+00:00): It moves several hundred nodes by many miles. Look for example for node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6680276914/history how the coordinate has changed.