piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
La Mirage Villa (2022-05-04 09:33:52+00:00): I dont see anythink. It is blank
user_5359 (2022-05-04 11:13:42+00:00): Sorry if the next details sound very technical. The result depends on two time factors. Firstly, the recalculation of the map graphics and secondly, the holding time in your browser cache. The latter can be avoided if you know how to clear it, or if you use a browser from another manufacturer that you rarely use.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-03 12:27:16+00:00): to be more specific it removes invalid data which mapped lane as a separate carriageway
Carlos Brys (2022-05-03 17:46:51+00:00): Se modificó la edición, ajustando a las recomendaciones de mapeo
eggie (2022-05-03 13:02:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback   Lijkt me oke, maar bicycle=no hoeft niet op een wandelpad. Dat is 'default'.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 17:44:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120635154 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes by a user account created to sidestep a long-term block.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5980 .
Dimacn (2022-05-03 15:34:13+00:00): Тег name используется только для названий. Не надо вписывать в него всё подряд. Название жилого комплекса помещайте на объект типа landuse=residential Подробнее: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:residential%3Dapartments Все остальные свойства объекта заполняются в других специальных тегах.
tonyf1 (2022-05-15 11:48:59+00:00): Hi, are sure you are right? Its a difficult one. its not the freeway proper, at best its a ramp. But it can't be both an off ramp and an onramp. Maybe its just a bit of Springvale Rd where off and on rampers make turns. I am surprised that you have left the foot option, pedestrians and bicycles are typically both disallowed. It appears that the tagging of this short stretch of road is to allow crossing Springvale Rd at the lights, I note on Mapillary that they are dual pedestrian/cycle lights. Your thoughts?
HighRouleur (2022-05-15 12:26:16+00:00): A vehicle coming off and re entering the MP Freeway would be allowed to use it to cross Springvale Rd. 
Agree that pedestrian would also not be allowed to use it.
tonyf1 (2022-05-15 12:45:03+00:00): But the pedestrian and the cyclists are allowed to cross there, there are pedestrian and cycle traffic lights. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-38.026031651943015&lng=145.13310556370993&z=19.074484937502394&pKey=1084370975616462&focus=photo&x=0.41688244094887994&y=0.7448165152256608&zoom=1.3296853625171
tonyf1 (2022-05-15 22:13:47+00:00): Hi, I think the bicycle access should be reinstated, my reason the pedestrian and bike lights. If I don't hear from you I'll go ahead. If you disagree please discuss on talk-au
Vadmium (2022-05-16 09:43:34+00:00): I don't know this interchange in particular, but in general I think these kinds of crossings at the end of fwy ramps should be non-motorway links. Bikes are generally allowed on the roadway, even if not on foot crossings. And pedestrians are also generally allowed to cross. This is regardless of traffic lights. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link#Link_roads_between_different_highways_types

I would extend bike access up the on/off ramps to meet the path drawn on the side of the road. Otherwise in this case bike routing can only get on the path via the driveway further south.
tonyf1 (2022-05-16 10:51:24+00:00): Changeset #121046678 I have restored bicycle=yes, I have changed the crossings to trunk rd, thanks  Vadmium for the suggestion, the crossings which are both pedestrian and bike still need to be linked to for routing
HighRouleur (2022-05-16 12:21:34+00:00): The pedestrian crossing indicated at the MP freeway and Springvale Rd intersection is slightly  south of the off-ramp and on ramps. To be able to use the off-ramp, access needs to be permissible i.e. Car or truck.  I don’t see that you can use the off-ramp from MP freeway and cross over Springvale Rd and back onto the MP freeway if you do not explicitly have permission to use the MP freeway as a pedestrian or cyclist. 
Tagging way 198521879 with bicycle and footway  = yes make no sense at all.
tonyf1 (2022-05-16 22:03:07+00:00): Yes, its a difficult one.  198521879 and  12071643 don't actually exist. Springvale Rd is not actually divided at the intersection. There is just a rectangle of asphalt, the intersection. I would be guessing but I doubt the intersection is motorway. My suggestions (a) leave it as is or (b) take it to talk-au for advice
HighRouleur (2022-05-16 23:16:17+00:00): OSM wiki suggests that this way should be tagged as a motorway_link rather than trunk as its part of an off ramp which by default has bicycles and pedestrian access = no.
tonyf1 (2022-05-17 06:25:21+00:00): That's https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link  ?
"Use highway=motorway_link for link roads (sliproads / ramps) leading to and from a highway=motorway. These normally have motorway restrictions. These are commonly referred to as On-ramps and Off-Ramps in American English. " You are assuming that it is part of an off/on ramp, that is arguable. I am happy for you to rework this intersection in a way that allows bike connectivity at the crossing lights. If you think that the bike connectivity needs to go then let's refer it to talk-au for advice
HighRouleur (2022-05-17 21:33:56+00:00): These ways are are definitely part of the on/off ramp for the MP freeway as it permits the driver to get off the off ramp and get back onto the MP via the on ramp. 
Motorway link is the more appropriate tag and is consistent with mapping of similar intersections including on/off ramps from motorways 

Refer to east link off ramp to greens Rd as an example 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458112468
tonyf1 (2022-05-18 07:23:34+00:00): Thanks for adding a crossing. There should be a crossing at the north east end too.  crossing= marked should probably be crossing=traffic_signals.
Both crossings are shared path, the mapillary shows this. Good work.
Vadmium (2022-05-18 09:08:34+00:00): High Rouleur, I think other diamond interchanges generally should not have motorway_links for the road crossings either, but I may be fighting a losing battle here. :) FWIW the wiki section I linked says "roads . . . which can also be used by non-motorway traffic, should be tagged as something less than motorway_link."

Bicycles are prohibited on the ramps further away from the road by the "No peds, bikes, tractors beyond this point" signs, e.g. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=518667316564637
These signs do not apply to the Springvale Rd crossings.
HighRouleur (2022-05-18 21:07:46+00:00): I understand where you are coming from from the Wiki perspective but makes no literal sense. 
A pedestrian nor cyclist can use the off ramp as they are not permitted on a motorway. On this basis any link from a motorway to another road even across another road like the Springvale Rd Intersection is permitted only for motor vehicles.
Vadmium (2022-05-18 21:46:06+00:00): Could these crossings be legally used to access the Freeway Trail or path along Springvale from/to the opposite side of Springvale Rd? What about U turns?
HighRouleur (2022-05-18 22:01:56+00:00): Not that I’m aware of. The path is question is the way that extends from the off ramp to the on ramp should a driver need to get back onto the MP freeway. 

There is a marked crossing further south at a set of lights for pedestrians and cyclists
tonyf1 (2022-05-19 07:07:10+00:00): Once the shared use crossings are created at each end of the intersection, it won't matter what the tags are on 198521879 and 12071643 for bike or pedestrian access. Maybe it affects U turn cyclists on Springvale Rd but I can't see that that matters.
tonyf1 (2022-05-22 10:32:33+00:00): See 121312317 and 121311965 south crossing changed to lights and shared path, north crossing added as footway but its not connected yet
user_5359 (2022-05-12 04:55:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9711247886. What is the meaning of the tag xxx = West Wickham FP 12?
sloerunner (2022-05-13 10:06:42+00:00): That was a personal note which I forgot to remove.
It was something that JOSM validator didn't report.
Fixed now Changeset: 120927328
Vinber-Pro (2022-05-04 16:04:07+00:00): Bonjour Matéo et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,
quelques infos d'accueils https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Concernant cette excellente bouquinerie, est-ce de la seconde main, de la vente de livre, ... car l'actuelle manière de la renseigner ne permettra pas d'utiliser cette donnée.

Au plaisir d'en discuter, bonne cartographie
Lejun (2022-05-05 13:47:39+00:00): Oups, désolé Vinber, j’avais pas vu que tu étais passé. J’ai fait directement les recherches et modif’ histoire d’enlever tout le subjectif
Vinber-Pro (2022-05-06 14:16:33+00:00): pas de souci :)
eggie (2022-05-03 12:58:33+00:00): Welkom bij OSM 
 

Kleine aanpassing verricht:  
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode

MVG
eggie
Lejun (2022-05-05 11:39:42+00:00): Merci pour ces informations que je me suis permis d’étayer avec des détails purement accessoires. Si besoin je serai ravi de répondre aux interrogations voire de filer un coup de patte à distance.
Noen (2022-05-12 14:40:23+00:00): Hva legger du i «not open for pedestrians»?
foot=no og bicycle=no brukes for å indikere at det er forbudt for gående og syklende.
For meg ser det ut som at de veiene du har redigert er dårlig egnet for gående og syklende, men ikke ulovlige.
Kovoschiz (2022-05-03 13:30:27+00:00): Are bikes allowed on the part closest to the sea?
Stephennnnnnnnng (2022-05-03 13:33:02+00:00): No, it is a footpath
woodpeck (2022-05-18 13:21:21+00:00): Is there a particular reason why you singled out the building Driekastanjelaarsstraat 50 to draw a garden there, but have not done so in any of the neighbouring properties? Is there something special about the garden in No. 50?
Tom Ameye (2022-05-18 21:12:22+00:00): Hi Woodpeck, no particular reason. Nothing special about that garden. On the other hand the representation is correct: it is a house surrounded by a garden. Best regards, Tom Ameye
PT-53 (2022-05-04 06:09:01+00:00): Hallo ViniTeamFessler,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast auf desem Straßenabschnitt 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454670699/historydas Merkmal
maxspeed=70
eingetragen.
Da waren aber schon die Merkmale
maxspeed:backward=100
maxspeed:forwar=70
eingetragen.
Maxspeed:forward bedeutet hier, in Fahrtrichtung Nord > Süd gilt 70 kmh und maxspeed:backward bedeutet in Fahrtrichtung Süd > Nord gilt 100 kmh. War das falsch?

Auf diesem Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454670695/history
gilt sinngemäßt das gleiche.

Löscht Du den falschen Eintrag
maxspeed=70
wieder oder soll ich das für Dich übernehemn.

Fragende Grüßeaus dem Landkreis BC

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
ViniTeamFessler (2022-05-04 08:13:36+00:00): Tempolimit 70 gilt in alle Richtungen.  Also wäre ein generelles Tempolimit 70 für diesen Streckenabschnitt richtig.
PT-53 (2022-05-04 08:34:51+00:00): Bist Du Dir da absolut sicher?
Üblicherweise gelten Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen an solchen Anschlüssen nur, wenn man auf den Anschluß zufährt und nicht mehr wenn man vom Anschluß wegfahrt.
ViniTeamFessler (2022-05-04 08:59:14+00:00): Ja bin mir sicher. Dieser 70 Bereich gilt sowohl von Süden nach Norden als auch von Norden nach Süden.  Es gibt auch eine kleine Verkehrsinsel und die Abbiegung nach Dunzenhausen, sowohl als auch die nach Kleinwinnaden soll hier mit der 70 Zone geschützt werden.
PT-53 (2022-05-04 09:04:28+00:00): Gut, dann solltest Du die maxspeed:forward und maxspeed:backward-Einträge löschen, so daß dann nur von maxspeed=70 auf den entsprechenden Straßenabschmnitten eingetragen ist.

Kleine Verkehrsinsel > wo steht die? Wurde diese nach Eröffnung der Ortsumfahrung nachträglich erstellt?
PT-53 (2022-05-04 09:07:23+00:00): PS: Das mit der Verkehrsinsel hat sich erledigt. Sieht man ja auf den Bing-Luftbildern.
Sorry
ViniTeamFessler (2022-05-04 09:13:23+00:00): Okay, muss ich dazu hier diese Anfrage löschen und nochmals die Straße dann bearbeiten?
ViniTeamFessler (2022-05-04 09:15:36+00:00): auch jetzt gefunden, hat sich erledigt
PT-53 (2022-05-04 09:27:21+00:00): Du hast jetzt nur den Wert bei
maxspeed:forward von 100 auf 70 herabgesetzt. Es sind aber immer noch die 3 Merkmale
- maxspeed
- maxspeed:forward    und
- maxspeed:baclward
mit jeweils 70 kmh vorhanden.
Du mußt die Merkmale
-maxspeed:forward    und
-maxspeed:backward
komplett löschen / entfernen.
PT-53 (2022-05-06 07:47:51+00:00): Erledigt, Danke
marczoutendijk (2022-05-03 18:54:00+00:00): Your only changeset comment seems to be: "edycja ogolna".
Can you improve on that to help your fellow OSM mappers?
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
=====
Wydaje się, że jedynym Twoim komentarzem do changeset jest: "edycja ogolna".
Czy możesz to poprawić, aby pomóc kolegom mapującym OSM?
Proszę przeczytać:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Dimacn (2022-05-03 15:38:46+00:00): Пожалуйста изучите вики по свойствам объектов в проекте OSM. Типы зданий подробнее: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building  А также на тег строящихся зданий building=construction - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:building%3Dconstruction
lyctkel (2022-06-24 20:36:51+00:00): А теперь перевод, который я забыл...
Привет iWowik,
В настоящее время я исследую некоторые редко используемые теги building=*.
В процессе я нашел https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056873815, который использует building=металлоконструкция.
Этот тег используется только здесь.
С моей точки зрения construction:building=yes в сочетании с description=Строящийся Физкультурно-оздоровительный комплекс подошел бы лучше.
С уважением,
lyctkel

постскриптум. Извините за мой смешной русский, он был переведен машиной.
literan (2022-05-03 17:10:54+00:00): но зачем же вы поезду Москва - Кинешма название испортили?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2302723

откачу в этой части
arnisoft (2022-05-04 16:35:20+00:00): Я просто хотел отразить тот факт, что поезд Москва - Кинешма на этом остановочном пункте не имеет стоянки. А вот Иваново - Кинешма имеет.
Но видимо суть правки оказалась другой. Буду внимательнее.
literan (2022-05-04 17:18:57+00:00): а на каком конкретно? давайте я поправлю
arnisoft (2022-05-04 19:50:47+00:00): Между Иваново и Кинешмой на следующих станциях и остановочных пунктах поезд Москва-Кинешма не останавливается:
- Строкино
- Красносельская
- 344 км
- Игнатьевская
- Горкино
- 373 км
- Пешково
Эти остановки только для местного дизель-поезда.

p.s. Обсуждаемый поезд №674/673 - это дополнительный, назначается в отдельные дни года. Основной (ежедневный) поезд Москва-Кинешма имеет номер 662/661.
literan (2022-05-09 12:59:27+00:00): пофиксил, убрал лишние остановки
laurent-38 (2022-05-03 14:18:24+00:00): Bonjour fp248,

Sur OpenStreetMap, building:levels est le nombre de niveaux du bâtiment, rez-de-chaussée compris (ce n'est pas le nombre d'étages au dessus du rez-de-chaussée). J'ai corrigé la valeur de 0 en 1. Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120501949 et https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/533178516 .

Cordialement
~~
laurent-38
Warin61 (2022-05-04 00:47:07+00:00): Hi,
The grass area (way number 983550302) has 2 problems;

has areas tagged as trees - in cannot be both tree and grass .. chose one. 

the name suggests the area is a reserve ... and it should be tagged as a reserve not a grassland? 

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983550302#map=17/-37.68420/145.13250
Warin61 (2022-05-04 00:48:35+00:00): Added note. 
Please wait a while for your changes to take effect on the default map .. it can take some days.
Fraxi (2025-11-06 18:47:47+00:00): w1056875907 изглежда е паркинг(видно от снимките). Променям тага на amenity=parking.
Dimitar155 (2025-11-06 20:22:31+00:00): 👌
hanchao (2022-05-04 02:07:36+00:00): 地铁站推荐用点标住，地铁站的建筑物不要加地铁站的标签（railway=station），这样会导致一个stop_area里包含了两个地铁站
hanchao (2022-05-04 02:10:42+00:00): 另外network通常是放完整城市网络系统的，应该填南京地铁，而不是南京地铁x号线
eggie (2022-05-03 14:44:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Houd het gebied bvan je edits wat kleiner. Schuiven met de kaart levert schade op. 
addr:housenumber	5J	
addr:street	Mendelssohnplein	 ligt nu heel ergens anders.
Svp geen gebouwen veranderen. Het is allemaal directe import uit het kadaster. Wanneer iets niet klopt dan aan het Kadster doorgeven. 

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120500706



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-05-03 14:53:55+00:00): Adres en schade aan gebouwen hersteld. Wanneer je punte zien aan de gbouwen van de daken is het niet de bedoeling die te gaan overtrekken. Dat is een verkeerde interpretatie van de luchtfoto die schuin zijn genoemen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-03 15:28:54+00:00):  k Zie trouwens dat mn toetsenbord mij niet kan bijhouden..
Inmiddels PB contact gehad.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-05-05 10:12:45+00:00): Ciao. Contrariamente alla comune credenza, disegnare gli edifici non è affatto semplice. Innanzitutto bisogna seguire la forma del tetto e poi riportare quanto fatto sulla base, come spiegato qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Roof_modelling Inoltre, gli edifici moderni hanno angoli rettangoli. Pertanto dovresti usare l’apposito strumento per ortogonalizzare gli angoli in iD: https://learnosm.org/it/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/ Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120500734
giorgio92 (2022-05-17 07:58:49+00:00): ciao Andrea, grazie del tuo suggerimento, la guida è molto utile ed interessante
sleipner (2022-05-03 16:56:48+00:00): Nein, deine Formatierung ist nicht richtig.
Richtig wäre : Jul Fr[2]-Mo[2]
Gruß
Andreas
joel1972 (2022-05-03 21:17:29+00:00): Danke Andreas für den Hinweis. Beim Ausprobieren habe ich im "Öffnungszeitentester" den Mai genommen um ein Ergebnis zu sehen und dann versehentlich den falschen Monat genommen. Nun steht der Monat auf Juli. J.
eggie (2022-05-03 14:47:51+00:00): Prima.. Maar geef svp aan wat je aanpassingen zijn.
MVG
eggie
WoSoe (2022-05-04 06:40:15+00:00): Hallo BigBjrn,

bei den Multipolygonen gibt es ganz viele Fehler. Betrifft auch anderen Änderungssätzen.
Siehe hier:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.55470&lat=48.93997&zoom=15&opacity=0.6

Nach Möglichkeit bitte korrigieren.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
BigBjrn (2022-05-04 11:31:20+00:00): Hi WoSoe,
das ist mein erstes Mal, dass ich mit Multipolygonen in dem Ausmaß arbeite. Schau ich mir natürlich nochmal an. 
Vielen dank für den Hinweis!
PT-53 (2022-05-23 07:07:20+00:00): Hallo tenzul,
Du hast bei dieser  only_straight_on-TR 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2248794/history
die Mitglieder ausgetauscht. Das paßt so aber nicht.
Bei einer only_straight_on-TR  müssen die Mitglieder die Strecke aufzeigen, wie man fahren darf bzw. muß und nicht was verboten ist.
Statt diesem Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25836774/history
müßte dieser Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056880988/history
als to-Mitglied verwendet werden.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
tenzul (2022-05-23 08:45:45+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

vielen Dank für den detaillierten Hinweis, habe es korrigiert.

Wünsche dir eine gute Woche
flohoff (2022-05-10 12:47:32+00:00): Moin,
ich habe den Schüttflix Gebäudeoutline nochmal ein bisschen korrigiert. Der Ging teilweise über die Grundstücksgrenzen hinaus.

Was mich aber mehr stört ist das da schon das Schüttflix office eingetragen ist. Das ist ja noch nicht bezogen richtig? Dann sollte das da nicht eingetragen sein.

Flo
bkil (2022-07-09 20:24:26+00:00): Szeretnék érdeklődni, hogy a posta miért került duplázásra? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9711469029#map=19/46.67857/21.08091
user_15822168 (2022-07-14 06:44:32+00:00): Köszönöm a visszajelzését @bkil!
A duplikálás valószínűleg a figyelmetlenségem eredménye, kijavítottam a hibát.
4004 (2023-11-11 23:23:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143775823 соврали получается вы
Wilmer Osario (2022-05-03 17:17:56+00:00): Acomodé a información del establecimiento basado en la información exhibida en su página web:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9711469605
Saeed SJ (2022-05-09 05:33:18+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز
این خیابان از سمت میدان یکطرفه شده و  ادیت ها مطابق آخرین تغییرات بوده. لطفا فقط بر اساس نقشه هوایی و بدون اطلاع دقیق، ادیت های سایر کاربران را تغییر ندهید.
سپاس از توجه شما
Saeed SJ (2022-05-09 05:35:06+00:00): خیابان خداداد 1 به میدان راه ندارد.
DaryaSea (2022-05-10 21:17:26+00:00):   سلام  Saeed SJ،  بعد از  مرور و بازنگری این ناحیه، با شما  در مورد هندسه این تقاطع موافق هستم.  متشکرم از شما برای این به روز رسانی
SHARCRASH (2022-05-12 20:21:42+00:00): Hi D.! About you "fixme=the shoots are too small for fruitbearing trees" here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671110414 , actually orchards include cultures of fruits coming from shrubs (strawberries, raspberries, figs...), not only from trees. Usually if the plants are aligned it means there are put that way to ease the cultivating process. It's totally possible though that the farmer changed the crop.
SHARCRASH (2022-05-12 20:25:52+00:00): By the way, do not forget to use the correct highway value, specially tracks vs paths like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056892908/history

Have a good evening! ;)
wilda69 (2022-05-13 13:00:09+00:00): Hi M! I think the area is owned by the National Forest authorities as I saw them working there some years ago. It is now almost totally overgrown so not  ideal for fruit vegetation hence my question. They have also chopped the strip of trees adjacent to the main road and the path is at places almost gone. In fact they kindly put it all the branches etc in one place, bang on the path near the service road.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/632883293
You have to struggle over stumps to reach it; As it is an official walk from de Thionville Office de Tourisme I assume this will be resolved during the summer and have not plotted the way I managed to get past!
That other way you mentioned it starts as a track 3 but ofcourse going down turns into a path. I should have put a fixme as did not fully take it this time.
All the best!
Dan
Jrachi (2023-05-13 14:18:45+00:00): Ciao.
Devi aver fatto un errore di copia-incolla sul C03C.
user_1566574 (2022-05-12 19:47:59+00:00): Hi,
This edit was a mistake (actually, it seems that this maproulette challenge was a non-sense), please revert this edit.
Thank you by adance.
– The local contributor who knows well this city.
Skinoku (2022-05-05 09:17:00+00:00): Ciao,
ho aggiunto il tag amenity=drinking_water, necessario per i punti in cui si può prelevare acqua potabile (di solito in piccole quantità).
Fonte:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water
Grazie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120503032
GOwin (2022-05-05 01:18:52+00:00): Thank you for your edit. Mapped "areas" in OpenStreetMap are not displayed (rendered) on the map unless they're used with more specific tags that describe or match the features.

In your original edit, it appears that you're trying to map an orchard, and left a comment in your changset that said it's  "Ñumana Farm".

That information was extrapolated, and put together here: https://osm.org/go/4zkE81FQQ--?m=

Please feel free to update them, or add more details to make it more useful for other people.