piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Taya_S (2023-06-05 14:33:03+00:00): Hallo tiptracks,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37259646#map=17/53.07765/6.64773

Ik zie op satellietbeelden dat dit pad recent vernieuwd is inclusief brug. Was dit de reden dat jij dit pad op "access=no" hebt gezet? En denk jij dat dit pad ondertussen weer open is?

Groeten,
Taya
tiptracks (2023-06-06 14:37:07+00:00): Hoi Taya!

Ik kan me deze edit niet meer herinneren, maar ik heb waarschijnlijk expliciet willen aangeven dat dit pad uitsluitend voor voetgangers toegankelijk is, vandaar access=no in combinatie met foot=yes. 

Als je access = no verwijdert - ik zag dat jij dat onlangs bij de Gasterse Duinen hebt gedaan in https://osm.org/changeset/136980716 - stel je het impliciet ook open voor fietsers, ruiters etc. Dat is niet de bedoeling. Maar wellicht kunnen we hier beter gewoon highway=footway gebruiken?

Wat de actuele status van dit pad is weet ik trouwens niet. Ben er al een tijd niet geweest.

Vriendelijke groet,

tiptracks
Taya_S (2023-06-06 14:55:55+00:00): Bedankt voor de reactie Tiptracks,

access=no heeft prioriteit over alle andere access tags, dus ookal heb je foot=yes dan zal deze nog steeds zijn 'afgesloten'. Ik had vandaar aangenomen dat deze gebieden gewoon allebei tijdelijk waren afgesloten, een misverstandje. 

Omdat het een onverhard pad is denk ik persoonlijk dat highway=path beter past. Ik zal de access tags voor de Gasterse duinen later vandaag wel even aanpassen voor fietsers en paarden tenzij jij hier nog iets over te zeggen hebt. 

Ik ben van plan om dit weekend hier weer te gaan wandelen. Ik zal dan wel controleren of dit pad weer toegankelijk is. 

Vriendelijke groet,
Taya
tiptracks (2023-06-06 15:54:44+00:00): Hoi Taya,

De veronderstelling dat access=no prioriteit heeft over andere access-tags lijkt me niet juist. Het is de hoofdregel waarop je uitzonderingen kunt benoemen, zie bijvoorbeeld access=no & bus=yes voor een busbaan waar het overige verkeer geen toegang heeft.

Verder zegt highway=footway hoofdzakelijk iets over de *functie* van een pad - namelijk bedoeld voor voetgangers - en niet iets over de verharding. Dat laatste blijkt uit de surface-tag. Dus highway=footway icm surface = grass oid kan wat mij betreft prima.
Taya_S (2023-06-06 16:52:44+00:00): Dan zal ik het daar in veranderen, helemaal top!
PierreV79 (2021-05-13 12:45:21+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour la contribution, par contre vous avez réalisé un "doublon" pour l'aire de jeu que j'avais déjà ajouté quelques semaines avant vous avec exactement les mêmes tags à 1 mètre de votre point... n'hésitez pas a rafraichir les données de votre application ;-)
DressyPear4 (2021-04-16 20:55:27+00:00): Olá, a área já está definida como praça, não há necessidade de colocar um nó dentro. A primeira letra de cada palavra deve ser em letra maiúscula. Se o local não possui nome, não adicione um genérico.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102988919
canfe (2021-04-15 13:30:43+00:00): Bocchetto non è abitata dato che è locality?
andgiors (2021-04-15 17:17:46+00:00): esatto, nessun residente
JessAk71 (2021-04-25 22:35:11+00:00): Hello, please be careful when modifying building outlines, this one in particular you had moved the outline to overlap the road and it became misshaped. I have already fixed this case but please be more careful in future edits.
Utsab Khatiwada (2021-05-06 04:56:21+00:00): Thank you for fixing, and I'll be more careful from now on.
JessAk71 (2021-04-26 17:51:21+00:00): Hello, I have noticed on a number of your changesets when you merge the hotel node with the building you are leaving the node behind and duplicating the information with having it on both the building and node. If you are using iD you can use the merge function to merge and then it will also automatically remove the node when you merge it into the building. This way you will not be leaving behind a node that has duplicate information. I have corrected this issue for this case.
Utsab Khatiwada (2021-05-06 04:55:40+00:00): At first we kept the information on both nodes and bounding box but after the latest update we don't do that anymore.
Thanks.
Lejun (2021-04-15 11:25:25+00:00): Sorry, didn’t thought about the bbox and uploaded it all in one go.
nevw (2021-04-15 12:32:29+00:00): Hi
the way you have tagged your business listing on the OpenStreetMap.org does not provide optimum value for you or the OSM.
Please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 or https://www.onosm.org/# to initially help adding your business listing at the building you operate from in to the OSM with suitable tags.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-04-15 11:47:26+00:00): Isn't that building square ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102991364
ianlopez1115 (2021-04-15 11:32:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 99553414, 99553449, 99553484, 99553495, 99553510, 99553521, 99553536, 99553570, 99553608, 99553648, 99553666, 99553702, 99553719, 99553736, 99553769, 99553802, 99553819, 99553832, 99553893, 99553910, 99553980, 99554040, 99554089, 99554139, 99554342, 99554355
Mika van de wiel (2021-04-15 14:38:16+00:00): Do you know what type of club is located on the node you added? club=yes is acceptable, but not preffered
ianlopez1115 (2021-04-15 11:58:59+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 99554373, 99554388, 99554407, 99554414, 99554442, 99554466, 99554497, 99554509, 99554525, 99554838, 99554867, 99554956, 99555006, 99555030, 99555047, 99555060, 99555068, 99555080, 99555099, 99555118, 99555138, 99555160, 99555173, 99555197, 99555218, 99555233, 99554984
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 09:21:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103620927 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still somewhat problematical.
!bm (2021-04-15 13:36:44+00:00): Hello Shaunk,

thanks, this is correct. However, buildings have been off-position a bit, so I have detailled them further in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102998608

Happy mapping!

--bestregards!bm
Shaunk (2021-04-15 15:36:06+00:00): Thanks !bm
And thanks for detailing and shifting the buildings! I wasn't sure the procedure for a bigger change like that.
Famlam (2021-04-21 13:41:26+00:00): Dag Lupien, je hebt een stukje weg van secondary naar residential veranderd. Waarschijnlijk was dit onbedoeld?
eggie (2021-04-21 14:54:41+00:00): Dit heb ik inmiddels al weer aangepast naar secondary toen ik de kruising reconstrueerde. De doorgaande route naar het zuiden heb ik weer op unclassified gezet.
Mvg
Eggie
JessAk71 (2021-04-25 22:12:52+00:00): Hello, please be careful with some of your changesets, in this one you removed the building tag for this polygon. This is still a building so the building tag should stay... I have already fixed this building but please do not remove the building tag unless the area is no longer a building...
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-27 05:15:32+00:00): Will keep that in mind, thank you
lakedistrict (2021-04-17 17:50:10+00:00): Hi Milhouse, you've accidentally tagged the whole path as a kissing gate. Please can you fix it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262543320
Milhouse (2021-04-17 21:35:19+00:00): Ah sorry, I can often barely see my phone screen when using Vespucci - unfortunately I can't remember now where the gate was so I've deleted the tag from the way and I'll have to leave it to the next visitor to tag it.
Kha_nam (2021-04-16 05:36:48+00:00): Hi jemma_d
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with service road ,Kindly check with way 903241370 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103031014
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102993074
eggie (2021-04-15 12:45:20+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Tip: Wanneer een bedrijf verhuist zal het oude adres intact moeten blijven.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-15 12:50:05+00:00): Tip https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/11/46.87897/8.23975 

en

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6edDUi1o9RA 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-15 12:57:35+00:00): Tandartspraktijk verplaatst naar locatie Koppelweg 15
ianlopez1115 (2021-04-15 11:59:09+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 99555426, 99555557, 99555752, 99555776, 99555867, 99555921, 99555972, 99556006, 99556020, 99512913, 99513015, 99513221, 99513352, 99513590, 99513746, 99513816, 99513881, 99513950, 99514044, 99514140, 99514195, 99514240, 99518000, 99518075, 99518207, 99518342, 99518412, 99518477, 99518561, 99518751, 99519249, 99519354, 99519448, 99519717, 99520062, 99520559, 99520625, 99520683, 99521068, 99521172, 99521390, 99521469, 99521565, 99521655, 99521731, 99522068, 99523326, 99523390, 99523435, 99523566
SomeoneElse (2021-04-16 08:11:07+00:00): Hello,
It looks like this changeset broke the AONB by merging bits of railway that didn't belong in the AONB relation (same issue as https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/101732782 ). 
I've fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103041800 .
Cheers,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 09:21:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103620927 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still somewhat problematical.
streckenkundler (2021-04-15 16:35:20+00:00): Hei,
hast du die Knoten vor Ort besucht? Das wäre für das OSL-Netz sehr wichtig. Das Netz ist schlecht und manchmal nicht eindeutig ausgeschildert. Generell ist bei der Erfassung von Knotenpunktnetzen immer ein VorOrt-Besuch wichtig. Mapillary und Co. können auch gute Hilfe leiste. Ich hab mir auch angewöhnt, mit dazuzuschreiben, auf welchen Knotenpunkt in welche Richtung verwiesen wird. Das hilft bei der Erfassung, Kontrolle und Fehlerprüfung. Einige Knotenpunkte erscheinen zwangsläufig doppelt im Netz, da die Nummern immer zweistellig sind, es aber oft mehr als 100 oder 200 Knotenpunkte im Netz gibt. 

Sven
ErichJacobi (2021-04-23 08:14:45+00:00): Hallo,
als Datenquelle zur Eintragung der Knotenpunkte nutze ich vorwiegend den online veröffentlichten Netzplan des Landkreises, der recht detailliert ist. Einige Punkte kenne ich auch durch Vor-Ort-Besuche. Da das Netz offensichtlich noch sehr neu und vermutlich noch im Aufbau ist, kann es sein, dass Knotenpunkte vor Ort noch nicht ausgeschildert sind. Eine Überprüfung und Aktualisierung wäre sinnvoll. Bei meiner Eintragung habe ich zunächst Wert auf Vollständigkeit gelegt und unsichere Standpunkte mit Fixme-Tags versehen.
ErichJacobi
streckenkundler (2021-04-23 12:52:20+00:00): Hei,

zur Info... Bearbeitungsstände der Netze: https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/cycling/de/networks 
OSL: https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/network/10982229

Beil OSL-Netz kann man aus den Karten NICHT (!!) die Route von Knotenpunkt zu Knotenpunkt ableiten, denn es sind auch sonstige, nicht zum Knotenpunktnetz gehörende mit Rad befahrene Wege auf den Karten enthalten. Das macht das Netz sehr unübersichtlich. Die Routen müssen zwingend vorher von Ort kontrolliert werden. In den Karten gibt es auch Knotenpunkte, die es vor Ort (noch) nicht gibt: vgl. z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2203581#map=15/51.8179/13.9818&layers=N

Sven
topolusitania (2021-04-15 16:32:42+00:00): Olá
Não deves indicar nomes nos terrenos que mapeias. Por definição já todos sabemos o que são.
StefanHRT (2021-04-15 12:21:59+00:00): Hallo, Aktiviere Dir mal bitte die ESRI Weltkarte, da sieht die Lage des Weges etwas anders aus und das Gebäude kleiner ;) Bei der Klarheit-Version sieht man sogar noch einen Zaun VG
user_5359 (2021-04-15 14:14:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Arnaud Champollion (2021-04-29 08:56:35+00:00): Je suppose qu'il y a un sentier qui mène à ce point de vue, il pourrait être possible de le tracer.

Ou bien s'agit-il du haut d'un site d'escalade ? On pourrait aussi le noter.
jpennycook (2021-04-15 14:49:43+00:00): Hi!

Thanks for looking at the shared use path along the new section of the Winnersh Relief Road.  You've marked it as construction=yes - highway=construction/construction=cycleway might be better (as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction) - this should make it show up as "under construction" on the map.  I'll change it shortly.
Did you see if there was a crossing between https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931020495 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905525074 ?

Jon
AkuAnakTimur (2021-05-25 06:32:56+00:00): Hello.

Please do not assume any possible connections between a controlled-access expressway (still under construction) and any other highways with lower classification.

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/8632201221
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/8632201222

In the near future, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745354026 might be crossing over a bridge the West Coast Expressway; or under a tunnel below the expressway.
AkuAnakTimur (2021-05-25 06:35:11+00:00): Sorry of the typos/errors:

In the near future, 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931021054 might be crossing the West Coast Expressway over a bridge; or under a tunnel below the expressway. There's a chance it might be split into separate segments, disconnected altogether.
pannala (2021-05-26 07:35:43+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTamur, 

We have disconnected the service road from the Express Way. Thanks for suggesting the edit.

Thank you!
om_mmyexplorer (2021-04-19 13:47:47+00:00): Why are you remove all of the exit names on motorways? While they contain some information about the destination to somewhere else from the exit.
Nithinat S (2021-04-19 17:15:40+00:00): The destination is not the name of the junction and shouldn't put it in name tag, according to guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction
I didn't remove it but change it to the destination tag, which is the appropriate one.
Regards
Nithinat S (2021-04-19 17:17:55+00:00): The destination tag is available in the following way from the node, leads to the correct destination.
om_mmyexplorer (2021-04-20 03:33:30+00:00): Oh... But exit names on motorways may be important, some countries like the Netherlands have used it.
om_mmyexplorer (2021-04-20 03:35:45+00:00): even Canada, New Zealand, Indonesia, and many countries have use it that I said too.
om_mmyexplorer (2021-04-20 03:36:17+00:00): Few countries that use only exit numbers like you have USA and Australia.
om_mmyexplorer (2021-04-20 03:37:44+00:00): But in Australia motorway interchange, exit names are used as interchange names in the center of the interchange.
Nithinat S (2021-04-20 13:44:51+00:00): OSM may somehow have some inconsistencies, since some countries may have a convention of tagging something different from the official one (in the wiki pages).
In Thailand we haven't come to a local consensus of these kind of tagging yet, so following the official guidelines should be the best way.
IMO, the current schema of the destination tag at the way following the exit node, together with the destination:lanes tag at the section of way between the sign and the node, and maybe with the junction_ref tag, is clear enough for these type of information.
If you disagree with the official way of tagging, you should consider make a discussion at the forum first, to prevent any inconsistencies in Thailand OSM in the future.
Regards
Jose Luis Infante (2021-04-15 14:51:01+00:00): Hola,
gràcies per la teva edició.
És molt normal que una botiga canvii de nom o d'activitat. Aleshores el que cal fer és canviar les dades, sense esborrar el node.
Ja està modificat.
Salutacions!
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-04-15 13:41:59+00:00): Thanks for joining the good fight, comrade - death to stale buildings !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102997054
SomeoneElse (2021-04-23 21:57:54+00:00): As I've already mentioned, the normal way to map a multiple-building hotel is to apply the hotel tag to the perimeter, not a random building inside it.  The hotel in this changeset was fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103357823 - I'd suggest that you need to say thanks to that mapper in their fix changeset!
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-04-24 10:41:00+00:00): Hello,
All the buildings in the vicinity of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931030208#map=19/26.73186/85.22314 don't seem to match any imagery that I can see that is available to us.
Best Regards,
Andy
aweech (2021-04-15 16:19:17+00:00): Hi,
It's 100% OK to just delete features that no longer exist, especially something removed a half-century ago. If there are ruins or other remnants that you think might be useful for wayfinding, then you could remove the amenity=shelter tag and add a building=ruins tag.
Nakaner (2021-04-18 10:04:41+00:00): Hallo,

OpenStreetMap ist ein Projekt, das die aktuelle Realität erfasst. Die von dir erfassten U-Strab-Stationen sind noch nicht in Betrieb. Sie daher mit railway=station zu taggen, ist falsch. Richtig wäre construction:railway=tram_stop. Ich habe das korrigiert. Bitte beachte außerdem, dass die U-Strab keine U-Bahn ist. subway=yes bzw. station=subway wäre falsch, richtig wäre station=light_rail + tram=yes + train=yes.

Darüber hinaus möchte ich dich bitten, beim Hochladen von Änderungssätzen künftig einen aussagekräftigen Kommentar anzugeben und die Hinweise auf der Wiki-Seite Good Practice zu beherzigen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Viele Grüße

Michael
FishDoctor (2021-04-17 15:56:15+00:00): Zdravim.

Ak robite taky vacsi import, tak si to v JOSM nedavajte do aktivnej vrstvy, ktoru budete nahravat, ale do inej a preneste si do aktivnej len tie objekty, ktore chcete uploadnut.
Preavdepodobne ste ani nekontrolovali, co uploadujete. Gymnazium Esprit ste zduplikovali, pricom pred Vasim importom bolo na tom lepsie (lepsie otagovane). Vratil som ho do stavu pre Vasim importom.
Ostatne budovy som nechal. Nechcel som Vam to cele revertnut.
Nabuduce si to lepsie skontrolujte.
aceman444 (2026-04-25 13:51:04+00:00): A hlavne cele to Inspire je tak nepresne, ze bude treba skontrolovat a opravit kazdu budovu. Takze ak sa to neurobilo pri importe, nema takato sada zmien velky prinos.
dcapillae (2021-04-15 14:55:29+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Para indicar que un centro parroquial está abandonado, puede usar una nota de OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Notas. Si lo prefiere, puede indicarlo en la etiqueta «description»: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:description. La etiqueta «name» se usa exclusivamente para indicar el nombre de la característica: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names.

Gracias por su colaboración.
dcapillae (2021-04-15 15:04:21+00:00): Véase discusión relacionada en: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102998700
woodpeck (2021-04-15 21:29:31+00:00): Any kind of automated editing must be discussed with the community in advance, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct - also, can you specify a source for the city of Hinda now being called "Joe ndi ndani"?
24ratcma (2021-04-15 22:03:24+00:00): The governments renamed it. Basic source here: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Ndi_Ndani
woodpeck (2021-04-15 22:20:12+00:00): This is a Wikipedia article that you created yourself one minute before you wrote the above. It doesn't count.
marczoutendijk (2021-04-16 18:34:38+00:00): That wikipedia article is now deleted with reasons of being fake or a hoax.
eggie (2021-04-15 14:36:17+00:00): Top!

Aarzel niet om met OSM te beginnen!

MVG
eggie
dcapillae (2021-04-15 15:03:43+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Para indicar que un centro parroquial está abandonado, puede usar una nota de OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Notas. Si lo prefiere, puede indicarlo en la etiqueta «description=*»: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:description o en la etiqueta «note=*»: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:note, según corresponda. La etiqueta «name=*» se usa exclusivamente para indicar el nombre de la característica: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Names.

Gracias por su colaboración.
micheleOSM3 (2021-04-16 05:33:48+00:00): Se una parte di sentiero non fa' più parte di un sentiero CAI, non si dovrebbe cancellare su OSM. Se non è più percorribile ma ci sono ancora tracce suò terreno, si dovrebbero impostare gli appropriati tag, ad esempio disused:route=hiking. Se la parte è pericolosa, si dovrebbero impostare gli appropriati tag. Si dovrebbe cancellare solo la parte di cui non c'è più alcuna traccia sul terreno.
H4N5-antw (2021-04-22 08:03:04+00:00): Waarde Jakka, 
Dank voor uw opvolging, maar dit is een voortzetting van de omheining; er is een strook waar de begroeiïng kort wordt gehouden, maar om dat nu als pad  op de kaart te zetten ; nog afgezien dat bewandelen voorbehouden is op aangeduide paden, dit niet als zodanig. m.vr.gr.,
Jakka (2021-04-22 08:06:38+00:00): Schrap gerust het foute deel
H4N5-antw (2021-04-22 08:27:33+00:00): Nog beter : omgezet naar fence ; nu nog het vervolg karteren.
Mocht opmerken dat er elders in het beschermd gebied nog zulke fences staan, en het traject van verwijderde fences ... prentjes opgeladen.
user_5359 (2021-04-15 13:59:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this a shop http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
StarSmilez (2021-04-15 14:16:26+00:00): It's a shop
user_5359 (2021-04-15 14:25:29+00:00): Please have a look at the website and enter what kind of shop you own. After all, you want your shop to be found by people who don't know your name, don't you?
Supaplex (2021-04-17 12:02:48+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
!bm (2021-04-15 16:30:06+00:00): Hallo Jonathanseinchef,

"da steht kein Pferd auf dem Flur" – highway=footway impliziert, dass hier nur Fußgänger und keine Fahrzeuge bzw Pferde galoppieren dürfen – also überflüssig, diese access-values zu explizieren. (Nur weil Felder in iD weiß sind, muss man sie nicht füllen ;)

--besteGrüße!bm
eggie (2021-04-15 14:30:52+00:00): Beste wjtje.. Staan deze verboden werkelijk allemaal bij dit vijvertje? :)
Geen scheepvaart mogelijk?
Wellicht beter weghalen.  
Editor iD suggereert dat je van alles moet invullen. eb en vloed.. zout of zoet. Voor een vijver niet nodig. 

Het water heb ik even ingebed in het grasveld.

MVG
eggie
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-04-15 16:44:09+00:00): Olá, você excluiu o ponto que estava escrito Tucumã, estar na descrição dos outros elementos não acho que seja o bastante.
Eve poss (2021-04-15 16:49:41+00:00): Vou verificar. Certamente foi um acidente. Obrigada.
Mike Baggaley (2021-05-08 12:33:46+00:00): Hi, in this change you have presumable inadvertently set a number of ways with highway="path as it was before COVID". can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
brianboru (2021-05-10 19:02:08+00:00): No need I did this deliberately to save myself work in case the situation reverses if BCC decide to remove the popup cycle lane in the road which currently makes this shared cycle/footpath redundant and I have to reinstate it

Regards

Brian