BrennanRv (2022-03-01 20:07:08+00:00): You astound me. I would genuinely love to discuss this further but the time and energy it takes to go into the detail you have just isn't quite possible for me. I haven't gone out of my way to make mistakes. I haven't marked any of the features like bunkers incorrectly. Because to do so would spoil the export I'm wishing to make. 

You seem to be twisting and grossly mistaking me for something or someone I am not. I merely wish to place all of the features that exist on a golf course and do so very accurately so to benefit me personally and in turn the users of OSM. That's it. 

If users such as yourself offer me a constructive piece of advice like earlier on - "Firstly; much smaller changeset areas, please". Very helpful, I had not realised it was possible to do this and to my knowledge I was only working on a new area fof Anfi Tauro GC last night no other area so I am still confused why it created such a large changeset area/bounding box. I've since made a few other tweaks and the bounding box seem to reflect only the area I was editing. 

Besides this one error I unintentionally made I still have not gone out of my way to break any rules, be rude or discourteous to you or BCNorwich. On both occasions where constructive criticism has been made I've been grateful for the lessons. But today I have basically felt like you thrown the rule book at me without actually telling me what it is I've done wrong on OSM. To my knowledge, I've edited and improved the tagging of golf features at some courses I've played and liked. I've then saved my changesets and inserted a comment to explain the reason for my changes. Then exported the area I'd like to use. That's it. I have no reason to argue or debate with you or BCNorwich. If you have something useful and constructive for me then please tell. If I've made a mistake then I'll say thank you. If I haven't made a mistake then I will tell you where I think you are wrong.  In BCNorwich case he seemed to think I had labeled an area of sand incorrectly. Which I took to mean he was saying label it as sand. I then explained that it had to be a sand bunker. End of.

You on the other hand have made one very helpful remark regarding the unhelpful bounding box size. The rest of what you have spouted off to me bears little relevance to me because its all based on the assumption that I have been making countless blunders, errors and incorrectly tagging features on a golf course. Which just isn't true. 

Worse still, you have spent the entire time speculating on whether or not I'm here for good reasons or whether I'm here just selfishly spoiling areas of the OSM maps and almost going out of my way to be rude to more experienced mappers. Again not true. Lest we forget you are the one that started using the swear words earlier, not me.

I'd say you are an excellent writer and I've enjoyed learning more from your quality of grammar and use of the English language then I have of your speculation into my personality type and motives on OSM. In contrast to you I feel I would probably be better able to articulate my point in person then I could in writing. You'd also be able to see how I'm not here to disrespect you users. But I'm also not here to be patronised. I don't want loads of speculative judgements made by you about my character and intentions on OSM. 

I wish I had more time and energy to write a response to every single comment you've made, but I fear it won't achieve anything and you have already made countless assumptions about me already. So you carry on doing you and I'll carry on doing me. Learning along the way from the RELATIVE constructive criticisms. Emphasis on the word relative! 

Please keep your next response short. I have a life outside of OSM as do you I'm sure.