piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-09-18 17:46:47+00:00): In het verleden tagden we vaak cycleway=opposite
, maar tegenwoordig zie je meer oneway:bicycle=no
Anders kom je in de problemen bij meer tags die met cycleway beginnen. Bv cycleway=lane   of shared_lane.
Maar het blijft gecompliceerd.
Het is het een of het ander dus.
oneway:bicycle=no is uit consensus ontstaan.
In de editor iD en potlatch2 vind je het niet terug.
SK53 (2017-10-06 12:00:20+00:00): Some 'buildings' are errors: patches of dark earth. If you cross check against DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery you can see this more clearly. Examples: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524785250; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524785249. Both either are bounded by walls/hedges or in latter case have walls/hedges inside the polygon.
Carnildo (2017-09-15 03:26:54+00:00): Which imagery did you use when adjusting the cliffs?  Not all aerial photographs are created equal, and when tracing something with abrupt changes in height like this, it's critical that you use images with good orthorectification.
martefact (2017-09-15 05:55:56+00:00): Hello Carnildo - I used/consulted multiple sources to adjust the cliffline geo. USGS Topo, multiple hires aerials including ortho and nonortho. I've also hiked the entirety of the butte recording GPS tracks.
Carnildo (2017-09-15 06:08:14+00:00): Sounds good to me.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 06:25:08+00:00): Hello Virgil Guo. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7551133 there's an unnecessary colon after `alt_name`, right? #newkey #typo
pm5 (2017-09-15 00:11:37+00:00): Resolved note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1133821
pm5 (2017-09-15 00:25:50+00:00): Resolved note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1107300
user_6110846 (2017-09-15 05:08:32+00:00): у вас нет оснований для отката . М ы ищем инструменты  чтоб вылечить ваш белорусофобство в форме вандализма. Один- два картографа у которых нет статуса модератора то есть в иерархии проекта они никто не имеют никакогто права так себя вести то есть откровенно нарушать правила
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-15 06:13:22+00:00): Hello Natalia18. Does this building really has two addresses? Or is one the new and one the old one? Or has it two different entrances? Then you can map the entrance and tag the addr to these entrances ;-) 
PS: The problem is, that nobody or any navigationapp would search for addr2... 
#newkey
Natalia18 (2017-09-18 00:29:42+00:00): Hello! Thx for your watching to my work, together we build osm better.
Yes, this building has two addresses.On this house there are 2 nameplates with the address and people associate this house with one and the other address. The house is located at the intersection of streets.

Hmm, about this problem: what are you advise?
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-19 16:07:47+00:00): Hmm, at taginfo addr:housenumber_1 and addr:street_1 would have more than thousand usages, so i think you were right in version #5 of this building. So why did you changed this? The problem is the same, i think no navigationapp would read addr2:* nor addr:.._1. 
So, i asked you for the different entrances.
Natalia18 (2017-09-20 00:30:59+00:00): addr2: housenumber was added because it is so recommended in the article:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Features/addrN
With a deeper study and thanks to state data, in this case it is possible to divide the buildings into 2 parts and assign each one its address.
On the cadastral map it is noted that parts of the building are built on different land plots. And one part of the building is built later in time.
http://pkk5.rosreestr.ru/#x=15033623.259487027&y=6187908.491131548&z=20&text=27%3A23%3A0020340%3A95&type=1&app=search&opened=1
Therefore, in this case, I think the building can be divided. In this case, the use of addr2 is not required
eggie (2017-10-27 08:25:24+00:00): Alsnog Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-16 14:10:37+00:00): Hello arte y espacio público ut. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5106501761 you have introduced the new key `http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5106501761`. What is it for? What do you want to achieve with this edit? #newkey
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-16 14:00:14+00:00): Hello jalvar30. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524799554 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524799550 you have introduced a new key `#HOTMSU2017`. Should it be perhaps the comment for the changeset? #newkey
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-16 14:15:14+00:00): Hello alejandrasg. In this changeset you have tagged a lot buildings with `buildingudea=yes`. I think you should review your changeset ;-) #newkey
Jan Westerhof (2017-09-15 06:14:02+00:00): Restaurant Fifteen in Amsterdam is closed, and had already been removed. I removed it again. Please check your sources.....
GerdP (2017-09-15 05:17:49+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed this change because of the tag highway=crossing which is used on a way instead of a node. Is Go Map! encouring you to use this wrong tagging?
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
samuelrussell (2017-09-15 05:23:59+00:00): Firstly it isn't wrong tagging. The ontology specified within the wiki discourages it because some route mappers are programmed by unaware groups. 

Secondly the crossing is a way. It has a length, commencement, terminus and is not a series of separate nodes. Either the road and two rail lines must be crossed as a whole by foot traffic, or the crossing must not be attempted. There is no halt point between the intersection of the first and second railway, nor between the second railway and the road.
GerdP (2017-09-15 05:25:39+00:00): For the way itself the common tagging uses
highway=footway + footway=crossing.
samuelrussell (2017-09-15 05:28:49+00:00): And that ontology is neither mandatory nor represents the situation on the ground that this is a single object with length
GerdP (2017-09-15 05:33:19+00:00): Sorry, you lost me. Do you want to establish a new tagging system here?
samuelrussell (2017-09-15 05:36:29+00:00): This is an existed supported tagging system. It is specified in the English language wiki
GerdP (2017-09-15 05:39:00+00:00): Don't think so. The wiki separates clearly between nodes and ways. Please review.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
I refer to "The tag is set for the node where the both ways are crossing (footway and street, street and railway and so on). For detailed mapping it may be useful to tag ways leading from a sidewalk to the crossing node with footway=crossing or cycleway=crossing as appropriate. "
samuelrussell (2017-09-15 05:41:03+00:00): Wiki>
Tagging crossings as ways

Some mappers tag a way Way segment of a highway=footway or highway=cycleway that crosses multiple roads and/or railways with crossing=traffic_signals to indicate that there is only one traffic light controlling the cyclist or pedestrian, to avoid multiple nodes Node being tagged as crossings.

Similarly, a way segment of a highway=footway is being tagged crossing=uncontrolled + crossing_ref=zebra to indicate its full length.

Disadvantage: Please note that this mapping style makes it difficult for routers and navigation systems to recognise that there is a crossing for pedestrians or cyclists along the road, since there is no special crossing node Node on the route being evaluated.
GerdP (2017-09-15 05:46:08+00:00): You see? No mention of highway=crossing to be used on ways here.
samuelrussell (2017-09-15 06:07:51+00:00): Feel free to be as bold as you enjoy and should I be able to make any sense of your tagging I will model it.
GerdP (2017-09-15 06:30:14+00:00): Well, sorry for sounding bold. English is my 2nd language. It seems that "LPI NSW" sat images are out-dated in this place as they show the road and the rails at a different position. Maybe look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2347313297
This was also created by you and corresponds to the wiki reg. the highway=crossing tag. I just don't understand the tag ramp=both on it.
Maybe something like kerb=lowered as in 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Akerb ?
samuelrussell (2017-09-15 06:38:33+00:00): I did check the wiki before using ramp=both which appeared as suggested. I'm using it to code the presence of what are called "pram ramps" in Australian design. 1 m wide useable ramps from a raised footpath to the road level. 

In this section of road the road and the railway are separated. A short way to the east the situation is different and they're conjoined. I'll edit that section to show that it is one way that is bidi two track rail and a bidi two lane road. 

With being bold, I mean please edit my tagging of that crossing structure I mapped so I can model off your tagging!
GerdP (2017-09-15 06:39:04+00:00): By the way: I see some rails with bicycle=y or yes here. What does it mean?
samuelrussell (2017-09-15 06:42:57+00:00): The rails with bicycle yes are a combined bidi rails plus way for emergency, rail service motor vehicles bicycle and foot
GerdP (2017-09-15 06:59:37+00:00): Well, don't know enough about railway mapping, but as a cyclist I know that I don't like to cycle on rails ;-)
I hesitate to edit something here because sat images show the road and the POI next to it at very different positions, e.g. 
this fountain 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4027321793
seems to be 8m from its real position.
GerdP (2017-09-17 05:15:01+00:00): OK, so I guess that the sat image is outaged, See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52108756
LPI NSW also shows a large building in the south of this place which doesn't appear in the map.
Glassman (2017-09-15 05:15:17+00:00): I think you want to tag it as leisure=swimming_pool. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool for more details on tagging pools.
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:16:32+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Владимир К (2018-03-01 12:14:02+00:00): а тут что вы хотели под addr:unit отметить? не корпус случаем?
gadik555 (2018-03-01 12:23:46+00:00): Да, именно корпус. Все здания относящиеся к ПАО "Казаньоргсинтез" имеют почтовый адрес - ул. Беломорская, дом 101, а корпуса + к адресу имеют внутреннюю нумерацию. В данном случае это корпус №1004.
Владимир К (2018-03-01 13:41:19+00:00): в таком случае неверно обозначено. addr:unit не для корпусов.
Корпуса принято обозначать как 101 к1006.

Я исправил тут везде, где нашел. Дайте знать, если где-то ещё вы использовали addr:unit для обозначения корпусов. 

Тут осталось под вопросом расположение и номер корпуса. Сайт почты россии, яндекс и 2гис расходятся в показаниях. Вы уверены, что именно этот дом корпус 1004?
Владимир К (2018-03-01 13:42:46+00:00): И что именно в этом доме расположена почта?
gadik555 (2018-03-01 13:46:48+00:00): Это здание представляет собой центральную проходную ПАО "Казаньоргсинтез", в нем же, на первом этаже находится почтовое отделение №420051, периодически там бываю лично.
Владимир К (2018-03-01 13:53:29+00:00): и насчет корпуса вы тоже уверены?
gadik555 (2018-03-01 13:55:06+00:00): 100% это корпус №1004
Владимир К (2018-03-01 13:56:25+00:00): спасибо!
user_5359 (2017-09-16 07:03:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
eggie (2017-09-15 07:52:29+00:00): Probeer wel je commentaar aan te passen als je een edit in nederland maakt. Bv landuse= grass toegevoegd.
Succes verder.
Zero G (2017-09-15 08:11:54+00:00): zal er op letten. tnx.
SafwatHalaby (2017-09-16 15:35:02+00:00): Thank you for the Arabic name translations in Israel!

I was wondering if "ref:ar" has any practical use at all for road numbers. Clients can trivially convert between Arabic and regular numerals, so it seems unnecessary to me.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-05 08:04:56+00:00): Can you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1258544 ?
GerdP (2017-09-16 06:17:44+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
What is meant with highway="whera road" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524838765 ?
Bing shows a way that looks like a highway=residential.
StephaneP (2017-09-17 06:41:05+00:00): Salut !
Pourquoi avoir coupé la rue de l'Omelet ?
Au fait, tu peux utiliser l'imagerie BDOrtho de l'Ign, elle est de bien meilleure qualité que Bing, et celle de 2016 pour le maine et loire devrait bientôt être visible.
https://openstreetmap.fr/bdortho
MacDony (2017-09-18 06:43:32+00:00): Salut,
Tout simplement parce qu'elle est coupé par des poteaux en bois au niveau de la cabane.
https://goo.gl/maps/hNXWTgwca6v
Denis.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-16 14:04:02+00:00): Hello dolomynum. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249480141 you have introduced the new key `A1(M)`. I think it shouldn't be there, right? ;-) #newkey
dolomynum (2017-09-16 14:09:40+00:00): Hi! Yes indeed, it was my mistake. Fixed, thanks for telling!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-17 13:05:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53011130 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names that appear to have been copied from a Russian library book.  See block 1591 and changeset 52420815 for the attempt to find out licence details (or where the names may be verified).
user_5359 (2017-09-15 16:40:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your changeset comment says something different from what you have actually changed! The wikipedia page says the english name of New York City isn’t  Nova York (see name:en).

I will revert your changeset.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-16 14:13:57+00:00): Hello steerage. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524850454 i think you have misspelled the key `biuilding`, right? #newkey #typo
steerage250 (2017-09-18 00:20:36+00:00): yes, thanks for that. I tried fixing it using the web editor for the first time (I usually use JOSM) - just check my fix worked.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-16 14:13:00+00:00): Hello genes tairo. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524851836 there's a misspelled dublicate of `building`. #newkey #typo
aharvey (2017-11-04 23:40:47+00:00): Yes, please do map footpaths, they make pedestrian routing more accurate and informative. 

There are two ways to map the footpath. Using sidewalk tags on the road and as a seperate way. You can have both in use at the same time.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way

In particular by mapping as a separate way "This method allows for a more spatially accurate representation of the pedestrian environment. In addition, it allows a more straightforward use of barrier=*, tactile_paving=*, kerb=*, surface=*.".

The only thing I'd add is use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk to mark it as the footpath/sidewalk. This helps people distinguish footways through parks etc from the footpath/sidewalk.
tyr_asd (2017-09-15 11:58:48+00:00): Hi. Willkommen bei OSM!

Inwiefern ist diese Brücke denn "gefährlich"?

Ich würde diesen Hinweis auf jeden Fall nicht als "name" eines ansonsten unklassifizierten Punktes hinterlassen, sondern besser direkt an der Brücke (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154515811) platzieren, und zwar nicht als "name", sondern als "description" Tag.
eggie (2017-09-15 10:01:54+00:00): Dit is wel een erg groot gebied waar je edits zet. Graag klein houden.
eggie (2017-09-15 10:04:29+00:00): Dit is je changeset.. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52061404
eggie (2017-09-15 10:08:35+00:00): Je hebt rechtsboven een grasveld aangelegd. dat is correct, maar waarom loopt je gebied van je edits helemaal tot Leidschendam? Het is steeds zaak iets op te slaan en dan je volgende edit uit te voeren.
Zero G (2017-09-15 10:17:55+00:00): Ah, leermomentje. ik wist niet dat alle edist los opgeslagen moesten worden, dacht 1 sessie.
Zero G (2017-09-15 10:21:23+00:00): Ps. @Eggie, kun je aangeven waar ik aan moet denk bij 'klein'? Stad, wijk, land, km2?
eggie (2017-09-15 10:22:04+00:00): Nou niet perse, maar niet te veel edits in één changeset en het gebied beperkt houden. Dus niet een edit in Almere en dan één ver daarbuiten. Dan ben je het overzicht kwijt. .. en andere mappers ook. :)
Zie ook tips in de links van de welkomstmail.
eggie (2017-09-15 10:24:13+00:00): Mocht je vragen krijgen, stel ze dan gerust. 
 
Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
eggie (2017-09-15 10:30:54+00:00): Niet verder dan een paar straten.
Olga | Yanosik (2017-10-02 09:56:20+00:00): Cześć, rzeka Zielawa się przesunęła, możesz zerknąć?
wmyrda (2017-10-02 10:06:15+00:00): pewnie jakiś błąd w sztuce. Rzucę okiem
wmyrda (2017-10-03 07:35:52+00:00): Powinno być dużo lepiej http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52586794
Olga | Yanosik (2017-10-03 07:47:31+00:00): Jest super, dzięki za szybką reakcję!
Hjart (2017-09-15 09:56:13+00:00): Skal dette forestille at være en nykonstrueret cykelsti?
George H (2017-09-15 11:57:12+00:00): Ja... først færdig den 1. november 2017
Thomas8122 (2017-09-16 10:12:44+00:00): Du hast hier in dem Änderungssatz Sachen gelöscht, die nach Luftbild vorhanden sind. Was ist der Grund?
Gruß Thomas
raito (2017-09-16 10:48:24+00:00): FIXED
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52092018
johnny_1982 (2017-12-27 23:11:53+00:00): Wiederhergestellte Adresse ist nun 17 und daher doppelt (!?). In der Historie war es immer 16. Gibt es einen Grund für die 17?
Владимир К (2018-07-31 13:52:07+00:00): это не ваши личные заметки, это общая база данных.
R0bst3r (2017-09-26 10:21:39+00:00): Hallo rd911ra,
hier ging etwas gewaltig schief. Du hast einen Fußweg mit 2 Gebäuden verbunden über mehrere hundert Meter hinweg. Hab dies korrigiert. Bitte vorsichtig arbeiten!
Viele Grüße
aswiseman (2017-09-15 09:44:19+00:00): Sorry, I accidentally converted the Spar shop to a point in the building I added. How can I fix this?
BCNorwich (2017-09-25 19:17:20+00:00): Mo problem that's fixed now! 
Regards Bernard
one_half_3544 (2019-10-03 15:05:52+00:00): Пожалуйста не нужно заливать треки как есть без проверки - все дороги с поляне слётов уже были и заливка создала дубль.
sergeybe (2018-03-06 15:19:54+00:00): Здравствуйте!

А зачем вы добавляете тег достопримечательности на на все подряд? Разве туристам интересен брод или пересохший ставок?
user_5359 (2017-09-16 06:52:28+00:00): Can you rent this apartment for two weeks only?  (if not, then is tourism=apartment wrong)
literan (2017-09-15 13:12:09+00:00): Здравствуйте! Пересечение трамвайных путей и дорог не являются ж.д. переездами, правила проезда жд переездов на них не действуют. Не расставляйте на них crossing		traffic_signals
railway		crossing пожалуйста
Uterouter (2017-09-15 13:18:26+00:00): Понятно. Просто на соседних путях стоял аналогичный пункт.
literan (2017-09-15 13:27:15+00:00): идеально было бы их удалить. А то навигаторы при проезде путей будут каждый раз предупреждать "впереди жд переезд"
Uterouter (2017-09-15 13:33:41+00:00): Удалю тогда. Ок.
MrMoehritz (2019-01-28 10:20:56+00:00): Hi okami79, what was this edid about?
Glenn Plas (2017-11-10 10:29:47+00:00): Hey Marc,

Way 524896737 heeft verkeerde tags omwille van de GRB tool indertijd.  Normaal fix ik dit zelf maar jij weet het wss beter wat die tag moet worden.   Zichtbare onderkeldering kan je meestal wel deleten
escada (2017-11-10 10:40:26+00:00): Hallo Glenn,

bedankt voor de tip. Heb het verwijderd.
Ik was van plan een dezer eens te kijken of ik niet nog zulke gevallen heb laten staan.
Glenn Plas (2017-11-10 13:49:08+00:00): Ik heb vandaag een OverPass ronde gedaan, dus de meeste problemen zijn er ondertussen uit, als het niet van u kwam of van Seppe zijn ze gewist.
Graag gedaan, bedankt voor de acties!  samen sterk werk!
eggie (2017-09-15 12:18:42+00:00): Per PB welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-15 12:21:37+00:00): Dit was je edit. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52065794
Wat heb je nu willen veranderen?
eggie (2017-09-15 12:30:47+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
eggie (2017-09-15 12:33:34+00:00): Wat wil je bereiken met deze edit zonder commentaar. was het wellicht een vergissing.
Er zitten geen verder tags op. Ik verwijder de node.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-11-12 13:37:37+00:00): Hallo janvoigt,

ich habe vorhin drei Parkplätze umgemappt (www.osm.org/changeset/113695565). Ich habe sie umgemappt, da auf einem Parkplatzfläche einzelne Nodes (auch mit amenity=parking) gesetzt waren.

Dann ist mir dein Changeset aufgefallen und, dass du einige Parkplätze so gemappt hast. Kennst du amenity=parking_space? Siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space Das ist für die meisten deiner eingezeichneten "Parkplätze" - die meist eigentlich "Stellplätze" auf einem Parkplatz sind - geeignet.

Stellplätze für behinderte Menschen, würde man folgendermaßen mappen:
amenity=parking_space
capacity=*
parking_space=disabled

Den Parkplatz drumherum, dann mit amenity=parking + capacity=* + capacity:disabled=*

Einer der umgemappten Parkplätze (als Beispiel): www.osm.org/way/106960518
Ein anderer Parkplatz, den ich mal so gemappt habe: www.osm.org/way/603728922

Noch zwei Dinge: Der Name "Barrier-free Parking" sollte nur vergeben werden, wenn der Parkplatz wirklich so heißt. Aber die wenigsten Parkplätze haben überhaupt einen Namen.
Ich hab das auch noch nie gesehen, dass ein Parkplatz eine Adresse hat. Und das halte ich hier auch für falsch. Wenn du eine Zuordnung "Parkplatz <-> Gebäude" haben willst, dann sollte das IMO über eine Relation gemacht werden.

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
Ze0zohk1 (2021-11-12 13:39:15+00:00): PS: Bei Rückfragen helfe ich natürlich gerne weiter. Happy mapping :-)
user_5359 (2017-09-15 16:32:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!

Please see notice to pay_ment:credit_card: "This should be mainly used when credit cards are not accepted. If cards are accepted, please indicate which by using a more specific key. „ Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment
user_5359 (2017-09-16 06:44:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of you business please follow the links on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dveterinary .
eggie (2017-09-15 14:27:41+00:00): Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je precies hebt ge-edit. Bv serviceroad toegevoegd.
geoaria (2017-09-15 17:30:09+00:00): تشکر بابت ورود مکان ها توسط شما به نقشه osm
Zahra Saberi (2017-09-15 17:36:54+00:00): خواهش می کنم
user_5359 (2017-09-16 06:34:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcutline !
eggie (2017-09-15 13:59:51+00:00): In de regel wordt de info op de adresnode gezet. dan is er een koppeling tussen adres en sports_centre
Thomas8122 (2017-09-16 09:52:05+00:00): Du hast hier einen Briefkasten mit einem shop verschmolzen. Hab das mal korrigiert + die richtige Syntax bei den Öffnungszeiten.
Gruß Thomas
please-delete-this-account (2017-09-16 09:56:25+00:00): Oh, das war nicht beabsichtigt. Danke für die Hilfe. VG René
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-16 14:34:02+00:00): Hello Essex_Boy. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524918433 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524918430 you have add the misspelled `nan_made` ... and please have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Djetty which mark `man_made=jetty` as deprecated. #typo
Carlos Brys (2017-10-30 21:10:17+00:00): Estimado GUSS-BBLA
Los nombres en OSM no se escriben en mayusculas. Se deben usar Letras Capitales
Ej: Inmobiliaria Gerespo
GerdP (2017-09-16 06:09:33+00:00): Hi!
Did you see my comment here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46530165
eggie (2017-09-15 14:29:13+00:00): Tip: Je zou die landuse=residential gewoon helemaal over de bebouwing kunnen trekken. Dus ook de Haadwei meenemen en de Munenwei iets breder.
eggie (2017-09-16 14:29:17+00:00): oke