piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
osm915 (2020-03-03 11:16:04+00:00): Und wenn ich gerade dabei bin ... Toll, das jetzt in Eschau/Hobbach in OSM immer mehr Adressen auftauchen!
Straßen und Adressen sind mit die wichtigsten OSM-Daten - nur wenn die passen, kann man OSM gut zur Navigation benutzten :-)

Beim hinzufügen/ändern von Gebäuden bzw korrigieren von Gebäude-Nodes, wäre es super wenn du darauf achten könntest, ob diese eigentlich rechtwinklig sind und wenn ja, diese auch so einzeichnest.
Falls du das noch nicht kennst:  Beim von dir verw. Online-Editor iD musst du (wenn das Gebäude ausgewählt ist) nur die Taste "Q" oder "rechtsklick Square" drücken (https://learnosm.org/de/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/).

Noch ein kleiner Tipp: Nutzt du immer "nur" Bing? (steht zumin im CS-Tag "imagery_used")
Wenn ja, dann schau dir doch mal an welche Hintergründe iD sonst so anbietet. Je nachdem wo du "unterwegs" bist, könnte es Luft/Sat-Bilder geben die aktueller und/oder besser sind als "Bing". 
Die Luftbilder "Bayern (80cm)" sind zB idR recht lagegenau und in unserer Gegend gerade mal ein acht Monate alt (vom 27.06.19; bei Interesse siehe https://www.ldbv.bayern.de/vermessung/luftbilder/bayernbefliegung.html)
Gute Infos dazu enthält https://osm.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden
Absolute Genauigkeit ist IMHO schwierig zu erreichen, aber auch nicht ganz so wichtig. Was man aber machen kann (und wenn nicht genügend GPS-Spuren vorhanden sind auch sollte): Falls es schon Straßen und Gebäude gibt, sollte man sich an diesen orientieren und nicht jedes mal mit einem anderen Versatz arbeiten. Dann passt zumin schon mal die relative Zuordnung.

Wenn du dich intensiver mit OSM beschäftigen willst, empfehle ich dir kreuzschnabels Tutorial (https://einklich.net/osm/osm-tutorial.pdf)!
Alle Klarheiten beseitig? ;-)
osm915 (2020-03-03 10:59:03+00:00): Hi, bei dieser Änderung ist mir aufgefallen, dass in Hobbach in letzter Zeit vermehrt doppelte POIs auftauchen ;-)
Sie sind jeweils als Node und zusätzlich an einem Gebäude (Way) vorhanden (Kfz-Werkstatt Herold, Engel, Metzgerei Zimmermann, Fahrrad Hirsch).

Wenn du "neue" POIs einträgst wäre es gut, wenn du nachschauen würdest, ob sie evtl. schon vorhanden sind. Dabei ist es erst mal egal, ob direkt an einem Gebäude-Way oder als Node (ggf in einem Gebäude). Wichtig ist nur das gleiche Geschäft nicht doppelt eingetragen ist.
Es gibt natürlich immer Ausnahmen: ZB wenn man zwischen versch. "Ausprägungen" eines POIs differenzieren will (z.B. Restaurant und Hotel mit unterschiedlichen Öffnungszeiten, Internetseiten, Telefonnummer, ...) - sozusagen wenn unter einem Namen eigentlich mehrere POIs mit vorhanden sind)

Ich hänge die POI-Tags nur an die Gebäude wenn sich der POI auf ganze Gebäude bezieht (z.B. häufig bei Supermärkten). Ansonsten ist es flexibler einen extra Node ins Gebäude zusetzen (evtl. in der Nähe des Eingangs). 
Dann kann man problemlos mehrere versch. POIs in einem Gebäude unterbringen und das wäre auch "korrekter", wenn das Obergeschoss des Gebäudes anderweitig genutzt wird (zB Wohnungen).
Ans Gebäude hänge ich idR die Adresse (Straßennamen und Hausnummer) - diese "erben" dann alle POI-Nodes innerhalb des Gebäudeumrings.

Wenn ich dir irgendwie helfen kann ...
Danke und weiterhin frohes mappen!
osm915 (2020-03-09 10:49:55+00:00): Danke für die Korrekturen (mit CS 81840212)!
muralito (2020-03-02 15:36:11+00:00): Hola.

Lo que tienen que hacer es poner los datos reales que correspondan al tipo de empresa o servicio. Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

Despues si aparece o no en cada mapa no es resorte de ustedes, ya que cada proveedor que toma datos de OSM elige que y como renderiza.
maraf24 (2020-03-27 15:58:23+00:00): Korekta niezgodna ze stanem rzeczywistym.
Proszę w przyszłości o niewykonywanie czynności podpowiadanych przez edytora iD, gdyż jego autorzy nie znają się na tagowaniu i te podpowiedzi są nierzadko błędne.
eggie (2020-03-04 18:39:32+00:00): Beste Emiel, Waarom wordt hier het voetgangersgebied opengezet voor motorvoertuigen met motor_vehicle=designated? Dat gaat dan toch routeren voor regulier verkeer?

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-02-28 22:00:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review:  Een naam doet niets in OSM. Maak een combinatie met de aard van de instelling..
amenity=childcare ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare
MVG,
Eggie
Djminisite (2020-05-10 02:48:20+00:00): This isn't a park, this is a housing development.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-30 10:38:24+00:00): Hello,
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625284496 really a park?  It really doesn't look like one, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2176591 suggests it isn't either.
Best Regards,
Andy
Djminisite (2020-05-08 21:44:57+00:00): Andy,

I drove past earlier today and it's deffo houses, a pub - been houses as long as I remember and I've lived in the area my whole life

Thanks
SomeoneElse (2020-05-08 22:35:10+00:00): Thanks - it's now been shrunk considerably in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84918191 but is still there.
Djminisite (2020-05-08 23:45:42+00:00): As far as I can tell this has been housing since the turn of the millenium - this shouldn't be a park

Thanks
Linux Alpes (2020-02-29 11:47:49+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-ce que ce lavoir dispose d'eau potable ?
Si c'est le cas il serait utile d'ajouter l'attribut drinking_water=yes
Cela permet au point d'être automatiquement intégré dans les recherches de point d'eau, par exemple sur cette carte : 
http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/clone-de-cyclo4-points-deau-dans-les-alpes-de-haut_420377#9/44.1505/6.2107
sorcrosc (2020-02-29 00:01:14+00:00): Puoi indicarmi l'origine di questi nomi che stai inserendo? Sono segnalati sul posto? Sembrano nomi di percorsi specialistici per mtb ma molti sono sentieri comuni, alcuni fanno parte anche di percorsi CAI.
Tra l'altro stai inserendo anche i numeri sulle way e non è corretto. Sono anche già presenti le relazioni.

Lorenzo
surftrader (2020-03-01 22:46:01+00:00): I nomi li ho presi dal sito trailfork che descrive i trail.Sicuramente sono nomi messi da mtbiker ma essendo sentieri percorsi anche da biker non vedo quale sia il problema di aggiungere info prima non presenti.Ovvio che sono nomi non "ufficiali " ma se sono usati comunemente mi sembra giusto indicarli.Riguardo al numero (CAI) che ho inserito effettivamente non mi ero accorto ci fosse già la relazione.Ma è sbagliato metterlo nella matricola?Vedo che molti lo mettono lì......se è sbagliato lo tolgo.Saluti
sorcrosc (2020-03-14 17:44:26+00:00): Scusa il ritardo.
Ho guardato il sito che hai menzionato e sinceramente mi sembrano tracce inserite da utenti e con nome arbitrario. Esiste un gruppo Facebook "Pietralata Bike Park" ma non mi risulta che gestisca in qualche modo i percorsi sul posto. In pratica secondo me sono itinerari pubblicati solo su quel sito. A parte i discorsi su licenza di riuso dei dati, non mi sembra roba adatta a OSM.
Inoltre, anche se fossero pubblicati e ufficializzati in qualche modo, questi itinerari per me sarebbero da mappare come relazioni route=mtb ma sul mappare itinerari non segnalati la comunità si è sempre espressa contrariamente. Immagina se ognuno si inventasse i suoi percorsi e li mappasse a piacimento. 
Ciao

Lorenzo
eggie (2020-02-28 23:09:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
MKnight (2020-02-29 15:36:26+00:00): Sieht ok aus.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-08-21 07:26:18+00:00): Hi hedd,
I was doing some checks for strange tags and noticed you added natural=bay to this forest. I thought I should check if that was intentional?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=bay
hedd2 (2020-08-21 10:16:53+00:00): Hi,
thank you for your hint. I removed natural=bay, which, of course, is nonsense. Don't know whether I added that property just unintentionally or if I had run into another problem with ID editor - those seem to happen occasionally when editing complex relations.
flohoff (2020-03-03 12:34:56+00:00): Moin,
das du das in die description gepackt hast ist erstmal super. 

Ich tippe drauf das es für Imkereien ein genaueres Tag gibt - Müsstest du mal im OSM Wiki suchen. 

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81609388
RicoElectrico (2020-03-03 00:06:07+00:00): Hej, wpisałeś Witolda, a reszta ulicy ma Wiktora Cymerysa-Kwiatkowskiego.

Trzeba na to uważać w StreetComplete.
aceman444 (2020-05-06 06:44:37+00:00): Zdravim, preco cesta na Ovocne sady len 'service'? Urcite to bude ulica, ked dostavaju domy. Ci potom to opravite?
mapko (2020-05-06 14:31:00+00:00): Zdravim, ked tu cestu postavili tak zostala zatvorena. Tento rok tam mali stavat poschodove parkovisko. Ci sa tak deje netusim. Ak bude ta cesta pristupna viac ako len pre stavbu, tak nebude problem ju  preznacit.
aceman444 (2020-05-08 18:55:46+00:00): No maju tam stavat cely bytovy komplex Ovocne sady. Tak potom to nezabudnite preznacit, dakujem.
mapko (2020-05-09 12:08:18+00:00): Uvidime ako corona ovplyvni zaciatok vystavby... Este ani raz nezakopli.
maraf24 (2020-03-11 20:01:38+00:00): Co za bzdury. highway=footway jest tylko dla pieszych i access tego nie zmienia.
Nie twórz własnych zasad.
maraf24 (2020-03-11 22:12:39+00:00): Od kiedy to highway=path jest ścieżką dla pieszych?
maraf24 (2020-03-11 22:15:58+00:00): Nieuzgodniona, nieuzasadniona zmiana mechaniczna dokonana bez wizyty w terenie.
Usuwanie istotnych tagów.
Dokonana po raz drugi w ten sam sposób - czyli wojna edycyjna.
Alecs01 (2020-02-29 08:56:06+00:00): Ciao, non usare il tag building per descrivere un'area che non è un unico edificio, come questa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776788497
Polarbear-repair (2020-02-29 00:09:29+00:00): correction: s/DE/US/
CRCulver (2020-02-29 23:01:38+00:00): I was unable to verify the existence of the artwork when I walked the street last night. That is why I removed it, along with other things (shops) that no longer exist on this street. Did you verify it with your own eyes before restoring?
CRCulver (2020-02-29 23:15:21+00:00): If the POI is still there and I missed it, it would be good to set artwork_type to a value described on the wiki, so that mappers know what exactly they should be looking for.
maro21 (2020-03-01 23:20:07+00:00): Because dwarves like to hide :)
It's above your head, on the signboard. So I added location=overhead.
CRCulver (2020-03-01 23:40:46+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. Now could you please set artwork_type to a tag that will be universally understood?
maro21 (2020-03-04 21:38:26+00:00): Artwork_type is and was set.
CRCulver (2020-03-05 02:23:48+00:00): Yes, but the problem is that you have set artwork_type to a value that is not even suggested by the wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:artwork_type

You set the artwork_type to what the artwork *depicts*, and not what the *type of artwork* is. Consequently, this POI will be missed by, for example, consumers of OSM data who are interested in extracting data on all sculptures.
CRCulver (2020-03-05 02:27:09+00:00): Also, in English the customary term for these kind of figures depicted in statues is "gnome", not "dwarf". See Google results: the number of hits for "Wroclaw dwarf" is less than a third that of for "Wroclaw gnome".
maro21 (2020-03-07 01:18:59+00:00): I didn't set the artwork_type, I just revived the dwarf.
All dwarves in Wrocław are tagged in the same way.
Artwork_type=dwarf is commonly used.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/artwork_type=dwarf
Dwarf is a type of sculpture. Like a statue or a bust are types of sculptures. And like mural or graffiti are types of painting.
CRCulver (2020-03-07 02:13:44+00:00): Yes, I have noticed this. However, I do not think this usage of an ad hoc tag, mainly limited to a single Polish city and with no wiki description, is ideal. There is a way to tag these objects so that they are readily available both to worldwide consumers of OSM data (who would appreciate being able to extract artwork_type=sculpture here) and to mappers concerned with the Wroclaw gnomes specifically. I am presently working on a proposal for the OSM forum to get the views of others.
freebeer (2020-03-07 07:19:06+00:00): hmmm, gnome suggests to me `garden gnome' which is a particular style of german kitsch found all over.

while originally i was put off by `dwarf', somehow today i was reminded of various sculptures i've seen, probably from the baroque, possibly rococo, era, of what today i'd describe as somewhat grotesque dwarves (from a period that cared less about political correctness).  sadly i can't point to any particular location, perhaps in german or czech gardens, and my art history books where i might find them are far away from me.  so without knowing details of this particular instance, i definitely agree `dwarf' would be a better description of the sculptures i'm visualising in me brane right about now.

i'll go away and shut up again, sorry.
CRCulver (2020-02-29 23:31:07+00:00): What is the basis for moving the location of the Adam Bilinski POI which I added?
maro21 (2020-03-01 23:25:41+00:00): I moved it only a little. It is on the first floor anyway, so what's the difference where is it? It's perfect now because it doesn't cover an address and other POI :)
CRCulver (2020-03-01 23:40:02+00:00): "It's perfect now because it doesn't cover an address and other POI."

This is mapping for the renderer, which as you know if often discouraged. Plus, OSM.org, OSMAnd and Maps.me, etc. will show or hide POIs and addresses differently.

In this case, it doesn’t make a difference because I didn’t go into the building up to the other floors. However, sometimes when mapping I do go into buildings and try to position the POIs in the right places, so in the future please don’t move POIs I set without at least giving me a heads up in a changeset comment
archie (2020-03-13 08:45:44+00:00): Why do you lay one highway upon another highway (not only here)? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/777196029
hedd2 (2020-03-13 18:22:51+00:00): In short:
I (most probably) did not.

As well as with some other problems you mentioned, it's most likely because id Editor for some reason does not load some elements completely, and/or did not save changes completely. So if an existing highway (or forest relation, or whatzever) does not get loaded, I won't be able to see it. I've had (a few) occasions where it could literally see the map needing several minutes to load all editable elements on screen, and since then I re-checked the map after finishing the edit. Obviously, this can't be 100% proof with the ususal delays.
Anyway, I've stopped working on OSM until further, makes no sense working wih a buggy editor. Btw, JOSM is for several reasons no option.
camelCaseNick (2020-02-29 17:29:38+00:00): Hey,
what do you mean with wikidata=Кёнделен on the way?
It had wikidata=Q4152143 before which matched quite well besides the name, you stated was wrong.
Is the name disputed or was just wrong? And is there a correct wikidata and/or wikipedia entry?
CamelCaseNick
Mazda05 (2020-03-01 16:27:25+00:00): Hey. «Гунделен» this is the old name of this river. This spelling was based on the Circassian name of the river and village.The same name in the state water registry and is used on Wikipedia. Now the Karachay-Balkarian version of the name of the river and village is used in the area: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=43.590923000000004&lng=43.23181199999999&z=17&pKey=ckFhTXCAvrXUVouF19TM-Q&focus=photo&x=0.5130054548818254&y=0.5997585086157284
Mazda05 (2020-03-01 16:28:23+00:00): Tags, that were deleted and indicated incorrectly by a previous novice member, are changed to correct
Mazda05 (2020-03-01 16:35:54+00:00): Приветствую. Вы указали имя на объекте natural=wood, который используется для разметки леса. Данный лес не назван Балкарским ущельем. Вы можете разметить непосредственно ущелье и наименовать его
Polarbear-repair (2020-02-29 02:45:51+00:00): DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-07 06:23:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81891227 where the changeset comment is: Backing out of edit that largely ignored lane tagging, tunnel versus bridge, and other difficult to resolve, significant reductions in level of detail.
Dimitri_Junker (2020-03-23 12:59:30+00:00): I added L Kitchen about one month before you, but on the east side of the junction, so we have to delete one of them
Dimitri_Junker (2020-03-23 13:05:17+00:00): I checked it again and deleted your version
Kovoschiz (2020-02-29 10:28:30+00:00): Unfortunately, it is not correct. Take it with a grain of salt as it is written by some people without actual consensus
1. Guideline-wise it refers to lowest level of road in network that can be considered distributor. The quality and standard description is wrong. 
2. Universally, `=residential‘ means local public roads providing only frontage and access. This one should be a `=unclassified`
Kovoschiz (2020-02-29 15:19:38+00:00): I should add:
3. Don't take "service road" literally.
4. Tunnel service road should be `access=private` (eg blocked off, working area), or I suggest  `access=discouraged` (allowed). `access=permit` means there is a permit that can be applied to travel there, which is wrong.
indien2020 (2020-03-01 10:21:56+00:00): thanks for the kottayam-aleppey ferry route :-)
nevw (2020-03-01 03:18:25+00:00): Hi
welcome to OSM.
building=shed is the more specific tag and therefore name=shed and description "Farm Shed" not needed.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
Why are the address tags on the shed instead of the main homestead building.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
Tomas Straupis (2020-03-01 08:37:40+00:00): O kodėl pietinis molas tourism=attraction? Molas kaip molas, kiek pamenu, nieko ten nėra turizmui, net sakyčiau pavojinga vietomis gali būti.
Aurimas Fišeras (2020-03-01 11:37:59+00:00): Lygiai toks pat, kaip šiaurinis, kuriame irgi nieko nėra?..
Jei esi Klaipėdoje, eini į šiaurinį, jei Kuršių nerijoje, eini į pietinį?
Tomas Straupis (2020-03-01 18:22:58+00:00): Chrm. Tai gal tada abu nuimam nuo tourism=attraction?
Aurimas Fišeras (2020-03-01 19:19:14+00:00): Nematau didelio skirtumo, kad tik abudu vienodai pažymėti būtų.
Objektai pakankamai dideli, kad netoli būdamas juos ir taip atrasi žemėlapyje?
Tomas Straupis (2020-03-01 19:51:37+00:00): Aš labiau žiūriu iš places.openmap.lt pusės. Ar čia objektai, kur norim pasiųsti (vidutinius) turistus nueiti? Ar nenorim?
Aurimas Fišeras (2020-03-01 20:02:12+00:00): Na, molas nebloga atrakcija, ypač kai jūra banguota ir palankus vėjas.
Turiu tik gerus įspūdžius iš Klaipėdos pietinio molo ir kelių molų Didžiojoje Britanijoje ;)
dgitto (2020-03-06 07:32:13+00:00): benvenuto in OSM.
"natural=wood" rappresenta un bosco.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood
dgitto (2020-03-06 07:33:43+00:00): forse è uno studio? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Darchitect.
nevw (2020-03-01 02:58:43+00:00): Hi
welcome to the OSM.

I notice you have just mapped a Bulaba Nature Reserve but is different from the gazetted boundary.
This is already mapped using the CAPAD 2016 and 2018 dataset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8445466
https://www.environment.gov.au/land/nrs/science/capad/2018
Also you have mapped a natural=wood area but does not appear to align with satellite imagery that I have available (Bing, Maxar, Esri).
nevw (2020-03-04 04:04:13+00:00): Correction:
You have not added or changed the wooded boundary. It was done by me some time ago and needs updating. I'll do that in the next few days.
nevw (2020-03-26 06:33:58+00:00): Hi
finally got around to redrawing the wooded areas in the vicinity of Buyu and Buluba Nature Refuges. Feel free to amend and correct as needed.
literan (2020-02-29 12:14:46+00:00): Добрый день. Я уже писал, не надо ставить на железнодорожные стрелки тег highway=motorway_junction (это тег съезда с автобана, например, со МКАД). Удалю.
Shors (2020-02-29 12:18:04+00:00): Доброго. Он по умолчанию ставится, я его не трогаю. Теперь буду менять
literan (2020-02-29 12:23:33+00:00): а вы какой объект выбираете? может, ошибка в редакторе, можно попробовать поправить
Shors (2020-02-29 19:21:55+00:00): ТАМ ПО УМОЛЧАНИЮ ТОЧКА. Я ЕЕ ПРЕВРАЩАЮ В СЪЕЗД - РАЗВИЛКУ И ОНА ПРИОБРЕТАЕТ СВОЙСТВА СЪЕЗДА С ШОССЕ.
literan (2020-03-01 12:18:34+00:00): вот и не надо выбирать "съезд-развилку", он для автодорог. А надо или выбрать объект "Железнодорожная стрелка" или вручную прописать на точке тег railway=switch. 

Но вообще, оналйн редактор - для новичков. Если серьезно хотите заняться OSM'ом, качайте JOSM, там все профессиональнее, быстрее и удобнее. Например, можно делать операции с множеством объектов сразу, или загрузить в него только нужные объекты (например, только линии метро, чтобы остальное не мешалось): http://josm.ru/
nevw (2020-03-01 03:08:13+00:00): Hi
similarly here you have named Buyu Nature Refuge but it is also already mapped as gazetted in CAPAD 2018.
I expect here you should have tagged it as natural=wood without the name and area tags.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 14:01:09+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:34:28+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
dieterdreist (2020-07-28 10:50:58+00:00): Hi, I have seen that you are adding footway=sidewalk tags to (virtual) footway crossing ways (the ways that connect sidewalks at crossings). Please use footway=crossing for these footways (together with highway=footway). Thank you.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
escada (2020-06-23 18:42:17+00:00): Dear filu,

do you have any idea when this road (Ptterstraat) is opened again?
Are you sure it is not vehicle=destination at this moment? How will the residents of this street access their houses?