piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
intschutschuna (2020-05-24 14:45:24+00:00): Hallo niclas_m,

deine Änderung von highway=path auf highway=track ist meiner Meinung nach nicht richtig.

Das highway tag beschreibt die überwiegende Nutzung des Weges, bei track ist das die Nutzung durch die Landwirtschaft (siehe [1]), bei path durch nicht motorisierten Verkehr (siehe [2]).
Weitere Eigenschaften des Weges werden u.a. über width, surface und smoothness abgebildet.

Der Panorama-Wanderweg ist mit dem Verkehrszeichen "260: Verbot für Kraftfahrzeuge" ohne weitere Zusatzschilder beschildert. Der Landwirtschaft ist es somit in keinster Weise erlaubt, diesen Weg zu nutzen und somit kann dieser Weg kein track sein.

Viele Grüße
intschutschuna

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=track
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=path
niclas_m (2020-05-24 19:49:39+00:00): Hi intschutschuna,
den Definitionen im Wiki nach hast du recht. Auf allen mir bekannten Karten die OSM als Datengrundlage benutzen, sieht der Weg als "path" deutlich schlechter aus als er in Wirklichkeit ist. Da müssten halt die render-themes entsprechend angepasst werden. Gut, wenn Wiki gilt, ist meine Änderung falsch und zurückzunehmen.
intschutschuna (2020-05-25 20:09:03+00:00): Die Definitionen sind nicht perfekt, keine Frage. Wenn wir jetzt aber anfangen, alles so zu ändern, dass es auf einigen Karten schön aussieht, verschlechtern wir die zugrundeliegenden Daten und die Karten werden nie angepasst, weil's ja schon "richtig" aussieht.
Mich nervt das auch des öfteren, die korrekten Daten haben aber Vorrang :)

Hab's angepasst, danke für dein Verständnis!
niclas_m (2020-05-26 18:44:56+00:00): Ok, danke dir!
user_2066394 (2020-05-22 10:22:45+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85603789
Andreas Gaeb (2020-05-24 08:15:27+00:00): ok, gut zu wissen, kannte ich nicht. Das Gebäude hier wird aber komplett kernsaniert und ist nicht mehr als Bäckerei zu erkennen, von daher passt hier löschen wahrscheinlich doch besser.
5m4u9 (2020-05-24 00:31:37+00:00): please restore this changes
Vauxhall8 (2020-05-27 15:09:48+00:00): Hi 5114u9,
I’ve restored the alignment here, thank you for reaching out.
5m4u9 (2020-05-27 22:56:43+00:00): thank you. I will update adjusting offset soon
hsc666 (2020-05-27 18:56:49+00:00): Revert Pokemon-Park & Pokemon-Monument
Frans S (2020-06-30 17:23:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.

Validators check mappers’ work to see if they meet the requirements of the project, are complete and of a good quality. 


A few pointers -
1) Most buildings are square so your mapping should reflect that, please remember to square your buildings by pressing the q key while the building is selected.

2) Please outline the buildings as closely as possible to the actual shape and try not to include the shadows of the buildings.


3) Map each building separately.

4) Avoid connecting nodes of buildings connecting to other buildings or features, like roads. Also don't let buildings overlap each other.

Best regards
skfd (2020-05-25 14:50:53+00:00): Привет! Классно мапишь! Если ты прямо там находишся то может сможешь отмечать building=house если ето что-то вроде коттеджа\частного дома.
Den S (2020-05-27 20:50:39+00:00): Спасибо за комплимент.
Да, как-то совсем забыл типы расставлять - нужно будет пройтись по зданиям (своим же).
mike140 (2020-07-12 12:12:48+00:00): не нужно создавать мультиполигоны из нескольких соприкасающихся частей. почитайте про мультиполигоны здесь: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Relation:multipolygon
Frans S (2020-06-30 16:58:12+00:00): Hello Hannah
First of all, thank you so much for mapping on this project.
Why this message? A team of validators review mappings to check if the mappings are according to the instructions and are free of errors, 
## In general, your mappings are a bit below the quality standard HOTOSM stands for.
Your mappings are rather inaccurate and  not squared.
* An advice, please map as accurate as possible, with corners, porches etc. Zoom in as close as possible. 



We hope that this information is helpful to improve the quality of your mappings.

Thank you for helping the Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team (HOT).

Frans S

*****HINTS & TIPS *****
* Sometimes, the project the TM manager imagery is very vague and bad to map from.
 Use another Imagery like Maxar P imagery. 

It is the most recent and shows more details where you can map from. Align it with the TM imagery (correct offset) and map all objects you can see. Then switch back to the TM Imagery and map the rest (mostly newer build or expanded buildings).
* Don't cluster a group of buildings by making it 1 building
* Always square your building (use the Q key in ID editor) except round huts and curved walls of course
* Don't connect buildings with nodes to highways (which is an error, roads do not go through buildings). 
* Avoid connecting nodes of buildings to each other. (They mostly do not share walls).

* If you are new to HOTOSM, this webpage is worth reading
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/bgirardot/diary/36235
For the Tanzania projects these are very helpful as well

Please see here for new mapping instructions   
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1bS_TVHPFHKKVBSdjx3RRQdxhdWrMJ3wdEh_BSnsL4hI                   

 https://drive.google.com/open?id=1N1rXlAyGcJ6VJ2p3qbD4PRsuo65o3pC5yHB2wq1TGEc
siwilde | GSuite Presentation 

* Searching for and identifying of buildings is sometimes difficult. When you are mapping, switch on and off OSM data layer (shortcut ‘W’”) and zoom in and out as far as possible (Check which Image you can use) so you are sure not to overlook buildings, (often partly hidden under trees)

* Please take a look to these pages.

http://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/

* Check the Offset of the image you use. See instructions on TM3 to see how to do that

* If necessary, try to zoom in further. When you see white spots on your image, zoom out till the object are visible as well, or try another image. When working in JOSM, switch off the automatic zoom. (Right mouse button, check auto zoom off)

* When mapping buildings partly hidden by trees do not follow the outlines of a tree but extrapolate the building picture.  Often there is a shadow on the ground near a building. Don' include these in your mapping.
*Communicate with HOTOSM
HOTOSM has a workspace and communication channel on SLACK
When you are interested, please ask for an invitation at SLACK HOTOSM
http://slack.hotosm.org
user_2092025 (2020-06-13 10:31:48+00:00): Cześć
Podopisywałem "proposed:" do kluczy landuse i natural by zbiornik przestał się renderować jakby był ukończony.
SmartGeoPl (2020-06-15 06:26:03+00:00): Ok, dziękuję.
Byłem przekonany, że przypisałem proposed
eggie (2020-05-22 14:36:24+00:00): Lijkt me oke.. Meestal kijk ik dan nog in de BAG viewer of het daar ook weg is... anders komt het met de zelfde vaart weer terug in OSM
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=104370.82884949&geometry.y=427619.90652679&zoomlevel=7&objectId=0531100000016577&detailsObjectId=0531010000013061
5m4u9 (2020-05-23 22:59:47+00:00): hi, maxar imagery have offset, bing imagery is more accurate
Parque93 (2020-05-27 00:51:27+00:00): Hi 51114u9, I see you have realigned this area already in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85668909. Thank you for letting me know about the offset with Maxar here.
ovruni (2020-05-22 16:48:58+00:00): Hola
Gracias por tu interés en editar en OSM.
En esta edición se han agregado varias edificaciones con nombres descriptivos, lo cual se encuentra desaconsejado[0], por tal motivo se han retirado dichos valores en los nombres descriptivos. Para cualquier consulta sobre como editar puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
Mark R Naird (2020-05-26 21:32:16+00:00): This changeset seems too big.
Frans S (2020-06-30 09:37:17+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
A  few remarks. 
Please try to map more accurate. do not include the shadow of the building in your mapping. Square each building with the Q key in the Ideditor. 
Do not connect nodes of buildings to highways etc.
Sometimes you tag a courtyard as a building. They miss a roof and mostly there are 2 walls with shadow visible. No need to map them
Don't use the tag 'road' for highways. Too generic.
See this wiki how to tag highways
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Residential tagging is for more urban areas. This is rural area
See linked picture
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JbvuFGh3ZoLdJGSoFUNn_cv7WaBY-cem/view?usp=sharing

Please don't ignore warnings of the issue triangle and solve those before uploading your work

Best regard and keep mapping
spiregrain (2020-05-22 14:07:36+00:00): Fantastic!
hsc666 (2020-05-23 19:24:46+00:00): Hallo Tourist-Information Stadt Dachau und willkommen bei OSM!

Bitte sieh Dir mal <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Stolpersteine> an! Dort ist erklärt, wie Stolpersteine korrekt eingetragen werden. Deine bisherigen Änderungen habe ich bereits entsprechend aktualisiert.

VG
hsc666
xoyyox (2020-05-22 11:24:08+00:00): Ok, danke. xoyyox
ovruni (2020-05-22 16:21:31+00:00): Hola
Gracias por tu interés en editar en OSM.
En esta edición se ha modificado relaciones de tal forma que se rompen los multípoligonos, por favor evitar eliminar vías de relaciones que generan errores en el mapa. Para cualquier consulta sobre como editar puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
aixbrick (2020-05-23 10:06:47+00:00): Thank you!
ftcat (2020-05-25 06:13:38+00:00): Hi uliwanne,

Please be careful when mapping rivers that you don't break waterway relations when editing the larger river systems. also I know it is very difficult in this area because of the ridges and valleys but try get the rivers running in the correct direction, sometimes you have to zoom out and hide the data to get a better idea of the lay of the land. I actually compile a Garmin map from OSM data with elevation data to have a look at the correct river directions especially where rivers start on either side of a ridge and in the imagery it appears they are connected but are in fact not.

Have you every travelled to Bell Point in this area? It is well worth the trek but requires 4x4 and to travel in a group and I can assure you the road is a track.

I tend to tag all rivers as seasonal as they will only run in the rains and the smaller streams as intermittent as well as they will only run after a storm.
UW Maddie (2020-09-02 10:02:14+00:00): anything only visible with bing bird's eye (unauthorized source) has been removed
chnav (2020-05-22 12:19:16+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы удалили дорогу и нарисовали её заново. В ОСМ так делать не принято. Надо было исправить геометрию, а не удалять целиком. Ваша правка частично откачена.
Burabay Damu (2020-05-25 04:22:28+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-02-06 19:05:10+00:00): I passed by this antenna: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7548440649 a few days ago on a hike, but didn't see an antenna nearby there; neither can I see anything closeby.

Could it be that they are the same as this antenna: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7548440649 ? Or that the former one doesn't exist anymore?
Vucod (2021-02-14 16:33:15+00:00): ok, I suppose you mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5747670946. I checked the permits. The Orange antenna(s) are indeed in the close by site (ref:BE:BIPT: 12251, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5747670946). It is fixed now
illiapoint (2020-12-04 11:23:55+00:00): Кондитерской там нет. Указанное name может нарушать Закон о персональных данных.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85609508
Frans S (2020-05-22 15:30:43+00:00): Hello Upasana
Thanks for mapping here
A remark.
On this part you mapped a few highways leading off the main road . These traces are as narrow as 1 meter and should be tagged as path.
But, These paths leads just a short distance in the savanna . No buildings around. Don't map such tracks.
See this document
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
See page 14 and further on.
Another issue. 
You mapped a piece of the main road going north but overlaps a part of that road. Just connect it on the other end of that road.
I correct them
Please take also a look to the issues.
See the right hand menu. Issue Triangle and solve the issues before uploading your work
Best regards and keep mapping
Upasana T (2020-05-25 05:53:27+00:00): Thank you ..i will wok on the errors.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85609680
SammysHP (2020-05-24 12:54:08+00:00): Moin,
 
hier bist du verrutscht. Nicht die Mauernstraße hat diese zeitliche Beschränkung, sondern die Zöllnerstraße weiter nördlich. ;)
 
Viele Grüße
SammysHP
SammysHP (2020-05-24 12:57:31+00:00): Und müsste das nicht eher bicycle:conditional=* sein?
SammysHP (2020-05-28 18:33:55+00:00): Habe ich in 85904236 behoben.
abakus_uploader (2020-05-22 22:31:48+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2020-05-22 15:09:51+00:00): Nog even gekeken, maar die aansluitende fietspaden zijn deels ook mofa = no moped=no .. dus G13.
Nu wordt er wel meer inconsequent bebord door de gemeente dus ik heb nog maar geen G11 pad toegevoegd. 
Die pakken soms gewoon een bord van de wagen omdat er een fietsje op staat heb ik het idee. :)
Leuk om een keer uit te zoeken wellicht.
Het is geen ramp als het er nog niet op staat.
MVG,
Eggie
hsc666 (2020-05-22 16:06:53+00:00): Hallo h3lpl3ss und willkommen bei OSM! 

Deine erste Änderung ging etwas schief, ich habe sie deshalb zurückgesetzt. Du hast aus dem Fuß/Radweg ein "nichts" gemacht, welches aus Pollern bestehen soll und dessen Benutzung rechtsverbindlich für Pferde vorgeschrieben ist. Das passt so nicht.

Bitte versuche es erneut und falls Du einen Poller eintragen möchtest, füge auf dem betroffenen Weg einen neuen Knoten hinzu und gib diesem Knoten (nicht dem Weg) die Eigenschaft barrier=bollard. 

Bei Fragen melde Dich einfach wieder hier im Kommentar zum Changeset.

VG
hsc666
aachso (2020-05-29 00:19:25+00:00): Hi Jeroen, looks like you created an empty node here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7548499566
aachso (2020-05-29 00:21:07+00:00): Also I just noticed you're about to hit your 10000th edit! Congrats and thank you for all the work you did!
jeroenrozema74 (2020-05-29 10:09:39+00:00): Yes, well noticed. I wanted to create a node for a swing set in a tree for node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7548499566
But I couldn't find the right Key / Value for it and forgot to delete the node after that.

Thanks,
jeroenrozema74
aachso (2020-05-29 10:20:17+00:00): I don't think there's a key for swings in trees, but swings in general can be mapped with playground=swing
jeroenrozema74 (2020-05-29 10:59:02+00:00): OK, thanks. And maybe I can ad "natural=tree" in the same node too ?
aachso (2020-05-29 11:15:55+00:00): Probably better not to, as a node usually identifies a single feature. A renderer or map application might end up just recognize this as a tree and disregard the swing part, which is definitely of more interest than a single tree inside a forest.

If you want to map the tree, you could place a natural=tree node just next to the swing.
jeroenrozema74 (2020-05-29 11:19:02+00:00): OK, thanks for the info.
skyper (2020-05-30 02:17:35+00:00): Or you could use rare type=node relation, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Node. But it is not supported by any software.
jeroenrozema74 (2020-06-06 12:31:47+00:00): OK, thanks. I created a virtual node for the tree. I think I did it right and assume the node for the swing will still be rendered/mapped.
velaia (2020-05-22 12:33:39+00:00): Good job! Nice first edit and it was fun mapping together 😃
sovereign_ch (2020-05-26 13:01:56+00:00): Entfernt, da es good practice widerspricht, vor über 120 Jahren entfernte Gleise einzuzeichnen.
Frans S (2020-06-30 11:43:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Another issue is the collecting of multiple buildings and map them as 1 building. This is not the correct way to map buildings.
Please map each building individually and be aware to not include the shadow of that building in your mapping.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas
Let highways never cross buildings as well. 
Navigation systems cannot handle these situations

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
PT-53 (2020-06-04 04:49:13+00:00): Hallo wolfshafen,
diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807310909/history
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüßw
PT-53 (2020-06-14 08:47:33+00:00): erledigt
eggie (2020-05-22 14:34:36+00:00): Review.. Lijkt me oke..

Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-05-22 14:11:13+00:00): Dag Niek Zo te zien heb je het fietspad op het andere pad geplakt.
Dat lijkt me niet de bedoeling

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-22 14:11:34+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85613119
eggie (2020-05-22 14:41:24+00:00): Ook een stukje bij de kooilaan loopt als opgeplakte fietspad op een track. 
Dit gaat niet werken zo.
Lopen die paden parallel of zijn ze vervangen?  En hoe zit dat met dat hek? 
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-22 16:22:16+00:00): Wellicht heb je ook wat aan de laatste satellietopnames ... 0.5 m t/m april 2020
Daar zie ik overigens nog helemaal geen fietspad. Wellicht nog highway=construction
constructieo=cycleway  ?
Zie:
https://satellietdataportaal.nl/
Blokje links in het scherm aanklikken en een vlak opentrekken boven het gebied. 
De data zie je onderin.
niekvanruler (2020-05-23 17:10:47+00:00): De track is vervangen door een fietspad.
Het fietspad is nog heel nieuw. Ik denk een week oud ofzo.
Ik heb de track nu verwijderd.
Welk hek bedoel je?
eggie (2020-05-23 17:45:05+00:00): Op de track een paar meter uit de bocht zit volgens de luchtfoto een hek. Hier loopt/liep het fietspad ook als duplicated way over dat stukje track naar de Kooilaan. Wellicht heb je het ondertussen aangepast?
Gr eggie
Niek van Ruler (2020-05-23 18:01:28+00:00): Ik heb het nu aangepast.
eggie (2020-05-23 19:37:30+00:00): Top!
Gr eggie
smootheFiets (2020-06-10 21:47:32+00:00): Wat geweldig dat dat nieuwe fietspad al op de kaart stond, bedankt Niek! Ik ben er toevallig langsgekomen. Heb een of ander tag bijgevoegd en het fietspad verder naar noorden toe op highway=construction gezet. Daar wordt flink gebouwd. Op de westkant van de voormalige roeibaan, ten noorden van de camping, klopt de kaart waarschijnlijk ook niet meer. Kom je daar nog eens langs?
maro21 (2020-05-22 18:45:18+00:00): A czemu adres na cały ten teren, jeśli na nim jest kilka budynków o różnych adresach?
Frans S (2020-06-30 10:42:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor.
Your mappings are rather accurate but not squared.
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.
I noticed that you mapped a number of buildings at the edge of your square just alongside the edge. Please map the building complete as (mostly) a rectangular building

Please map each building individually and be aware to not include the shadow of that building in your mapping.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas
Let highways never cross buildings as well. 
Navigation systems cannot handle these situations

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
Frans S (2020-06-30 17:25:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.

Validators check mappers’ work to see if they meet the requirements of the project, are complete and of a good quality. 


A few pointers -
1) Most buildings are square so your mapping should reflect that, please remember to square your buildings by pressing the q key while the building is selected.

2) Please outline the buildings as closely as possible to the actual shape and try not to include the shadows of the buildings.


3) Map each building separately.

4) Avoid connecting nodes of buildings connecting to other buildings or features, like roads. Also don't let buildings overlap each other.

Best regards
Frans S (2020-06-30 10:23:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Another issue is the collecting of multiple buildings and map them as 1 building. This is not the correct way to map buildings.
Please map each building individually and be aware to not include the shadow of that building in your mapping.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas
Let highways never cross buildings as well. 
Navigation systems cannot handle these situations

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
eggie (2020-05-22 14:31:52+00:00): review... Niks mis mee zo.
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-22 14:18:13+00:00): review.. Niek lijkt me oke
Eggie
bernardo60 (2021-04-19 13:57:48+00:00): Hi - I looked at the footpaths today and believe they should not be added to the map. They only provide access to the rice fields - after next harvest, they might disappear. They are not used by the wider public, hardly visible, yes you can walk there but that does not make it a footpath. The maps become very loaded if users start to add their personal cross country routes.The name given "Jalan Kaki" is misleading, they don't have a name, Jalan Kaki means footpath in Indonesian.