piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:58:37+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
chachafish (2020-05-21 22:59:33+00:00): Howdy :) Thank you for your work in the Lowry area. Just FYI, the construction zone you deleted had information that could have been retained. I went ahead and created a new apartment building area with the name from the old construction zone, "Broadstone Lowry Apartment Complex". Just something to keep in mind for the future. Keep up the good work! Cheers :)
S-zation (2020-05-21 17:54:00+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions!
I fixed up a few things in your edits. The "Guest apartment / condo" tag you used at Meadowwood Condominiums is intended for holiday rental apartments, not normal apartments.
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dapartment)
I also fixed the parking lot tagging at Church of Christ because you accidentally made it wood land.
Thanks again for your edits to Warminster!
Mark R Naird (2020-05-21 17:17:23+00:00): Please create a Wiki page similar to those at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Address_import regarding this import.
Joshua Fuller (2020-05-21 17:54:52+00:00): Hi Mark,
I'm slowly importing areas by hand from data sourced here: http://results.openaddresses.io/sources/us/fl/santa_rosa

I'm not using an automated method as I don't know how to do that yet.

It's pretty tedious at this point. 

Any help with all the data would be appreciated.
flohoff (2020-05-23 12:24:14+00:00): Moin,
da fehlt auch noch Straße, PLZ, Ort und alles ;) 

Flo
aixbrick (2020-05-22 08:16:18+00:00): Hallo,
besser auf die aktuellere Variante highway=path vereinheitlichen, wenn es sich um gemischte Wege handelt (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren). Unterstützung beim richtigen Taggen bietet auch http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/ (falls noch nicht bekannt).
Gruß
aixbrick (2020-05-22 08:16:57+00:00): Sorry, wrong Changeset :-(.
aixbrick (2020-05-22 09:28:37+00:00): Hello,
OK, nevertheless I have to comment that changeset, but now with the correct text. :-)
"Krantz" is spelled with "tz" and you have forgotten changing the names of a few buildings. But the main reason, why I'm writing is: You deleted the housenumber of some buildings leaving the address incomplete. Now the question is: Readding the housenumber or adding the address to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806888541 and delete all addr-Tags from the buildings?
Regards
trigpoint (2020-05-21 16:58:55+00:00): Street View? Please clarify.
mohanimr (2020-05-22 10:41:01+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits. I have misinterpreted the projection of a street view and deleted the road. Please find the changeset for the suggested modifications(changeset #: 85605257).going forward, I will be correlating the aerial and street imagery before making any modifications. thanks for the suggestion. always happy to learn from the community
trigpoint (2020-05-22 16:24:52+00:00): Hi again. You have not clarified what you mean by Street View. How do I see the grill?

Cheers Phil
mohanimr (2020-05-26 09:22:40+00:00): I have misinterpreted the position of street view https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=8Gg51XosMQ_dbY_ro59Pew&focus=photo&lat=53.0871826&lng=-0.8028606&z=17 and deleted the road. after your suggestion, i have cross verified again and identified it as a fence adjoining the road. hence created the missing road. Once again, thanks for the suggestion
trigpoint (2020-05-26 12:30:55+00:00): Thank you for clarifying but please be careful how you describe things in your comments.

Cheers Phil
Kovoschiz (2020-05-21 23:01:22+00:00): Thank you, but it's better to effect the changes on that day. I recorded it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85565542
Kovoschiz (2020-05-21 23:01:15+00:00): Thank you, but it's better to effect the changes on that day. I recorded it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85565722
mariotomo (2020-08-14 21:51:33+00:00): garita de seguridad, no me parece lo mismo que un checkpoint militar.  quisieras validar con el wiki?
eggie (2020-05-21 17:46:11+00:00): Dag Rudy.. Je hebt iets te veel weggehaald.. Nu is er geen gebouw meer.
Zal even kijken of ik kan reverten.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-05-21 17:49:59+00:00): reverted by changeset #85567730
eggie (2020-05-21 17:52:41+00:00): De info op de outline is de tagging van de BAG (Kadaster)
Die is van belang voor updates en building=yes laat het vlak renderen als gebouw.
Het enige wat er af kan is de info die je ooit hebt toegevoegd zoals de functie en het adres. 
Dit waren je edits.

Het gebouw zal nu wel weer terugkomen op de kaart. 
Eggie
RudyH1 (2020-05-21 17:58:57+00:00): Oeps, dank voor je geduld... Nu ga ik toch nog proberen de naam er weer op te zetten...
eggie (2020-05-21 17:59:29+00:00): Alle info naar de adresnode verplaatst..
Alleen BAG tags nog op gebouw.
eggie (2020-05-21 18:19:00+00:00): De gebouw naam kan er nog op.. Mij lukte het niet want we waren in het zelfde gebied bezig.
Dus als Bosoord de gebouwnaam is kan die er op. De rest van de info staat op de adresnode. 
Misschien rendert amenity=conference_centre niet op de standaardkaart.. Ik voeg wel eens office=yes toe.. Dan rendert het wel.
eggie (2020-05-21 18:58:17+00:00): Voor de volledigheid .. Dit waren je edits ..  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85566121
trigpoint (2020-05-21 17:34:55+00:00): Hi Joe
Thank you for your edit. Based on your comment I was able to find some new roads in OS Opendata, I have added them and estimated the residentail area.
Please could you check it?

Cheers Phil
joeturton4 (2020-05-22 15:33:00+00:00): The roads look like they are in the correct place Phil.
trigpoint (2020-05-22 15:35:54+00:00): Thank you Joe

Cheers Phil
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-16 02:59:37+00:00): please use more descriptive changeset comments.  What did you change and why?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
eggie (2020-05-21 18:04:05+00:00): Rudy.. alle begin is moeilijk en OSM wel in het bijzonder.. 

Hier zie ik duplicated ways.
Een stukje voetpad ligt geplakt op dat fietspad met hoekje naar het spoor.
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85566570
Klik maar op dat voetpad dan zie je dat het verder via het fietspad gaat. 

Ik maak het even los. 

Eggie
Itd5sS6uZ (2020-05-21 17:20:36+00:00): The changeset details were eaten up, this is probably a bug  in Go Map! (It was the 10th changeset with this version and a rating dialog popped up.) This should've said "Fix lanes on Prospect Street, fix service road lanes (thanks jyotkuma for pointing out the 1-way street!), and add things to Town and Country service road".  Sources are Mapillary and Mapbox Satellite.
user_18526234 (2023-03-02 15:36:19+00:00): Hello mapper999,
I seems that you have added an man_made=flowerbed:
https://www.osm.org/way/806898786
    
I recently started documenting and using landcover=flowerbed as an alternative to the controversial landuse=flowerbed. 
  
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=flowerbed
  
Would you mind it if I change this objects tag from man_made=flowerbed to landcover=flowerbed? Or even better would be if you change it to show support to landcover=flowerbed.
Please let me know what you think.
  
Best regards,
Tjuro
mapper999 (2023-03-02 20:42:18+00:00): Hi,
the established tag for flowerbeds is landuse=flowerbed, (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dflowerbed, currently used 41000 times). If you want to change that, you should start a proposal instead of just writing your own wiki page. Not sure why I used man_made, I probably misremembered the correct tagging.
Tjuro_Global (2023-03-03 08:02:45+00:00): Well i did start a proposal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landcover_proposal_V2
While landuse=flowerbed is used 41000 times it is controversial as its not a landcover. That is why I did start a proposal but then people say you should first have consensus and you can just replace a used key with something unused. So, it’s a catch 22.
Greetings,
Tjuro
camelCaseNick (2020-05-21 17:46:09+00:00): FYI: changeset comment is wrong. Should have been:
fix Reinbeker Weg in between both parts of the Luisen-Gymnasium + MP for Luisen-Gymnasium
eggie (2020-05-21 18:52:02+00:00): footpath bestaat niet in OSM

Staat er een bord wandelpad (rond blauw) dat highway=footway
staat er een geen bord (meestal in bossen) dan highway=path
surface=???


tracktype=grade? moet eraf als je path tagt.
Dat zie ik nog staan? 
 Dat is de specificatie van een track. 
paved en unpaved.. zijn algemeen.  Beter concreet taggen.. Dus asphalt.. paving_stones  en bij onverhard  dirt, grass , ground , sand enz. 
De ondergrond maakt niet uit voor footway of path. Wanneer je niets tagt wordt het als onverhard gezien.
Eggie
BER319 (2020-05-23 18:02:10+00:00): das hier soll bestimmt building=school sein oder?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=school

bitte mal anpassen, danke
Mike Baggaley (2020-05-31 22:14:29+00:00): Hi, can you please review way 806908066 which you have marked as a public footpath but with no foot access?

Thanks,
Mike
PeterMapit (2020-06-01 06:57:22+00:00): I have removed the public footpath tag and tagged access as private for all. Thanks for bringing my error to my attention.
eggie (2020-05-21 18:35:31+00:00): Dit is oke.
AkuAnakTimur (2020-08-22 03:04:31+00:00): Why the reference code of these have been amended slightly?

Check this photo I snapped on Friday (2020-08-22)
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hrt3sKS64yaEUTRK7OOK6MgKPoCh7ind/view?usp=sharing
Mappuccino (2020-08-25 23:22:54+00:00): Hello AkuAnakTimur, I was reviewing highway refs around the country and the “/1" appeared to be a typo compared to refs elsewhere.  I appreciate the feedback and image of the sign confirming “K308/1”.  Based on your understanding, does this indicate two distinct highway refs (like “K308;1”) or a unique ref (“K308/1”)?  Also, have you seen signs including the forward slash elsewhere in your travels around Malaysia?
AkuAnakTimur (2020-08-26 08:48:51+00:00): Hi. Many thanks for responding.

Although the adjacent one-way highway (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ESxNP25bR-B3G4TK0aMroXGCrYQi8kw2/view?usp=sharing) bears the plain ref of "K308" - see https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ESxNP25bR-B3G4TK0aMroXGCrYQi8kw2/view?usp=sharing - I will treat "K308/1" as a unique reference code as it is.

To be honest, this is my only observation of a reference code appended with a forward slash so far.
AkuAnakTimur (2020-08-26 08:50:10+00:00): Sorry, the first link should point to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284665037
Mappuccino (2020-08-26 22:51:18+00:00): Hello AkuAnakTimur, thank you for the clarification. I will go ahead and change the ref to reflect the provided imagery.
eggie (2020-05-21 18:37:16+00:00): Wellicht office=yes toevoegen om de naam te laten renderen.
xmd5a (2020-06-09 21:00:46+00:00): Добрый день. Вы добавили лес по Бингу, но по Maxar он практически полностью сгорел
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11127988
xmd5a (2020-06-09 21:01:26+00:00): А вот этот сгорел на все 100% https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11127989
Константин Гам (2020-06-01 11:28:14+00:00): Пожалуйста проверяйте что вы добавляете. Мало того что вы ошиблись типом, вы создали дубль
user_242798 (2020-05-24 18:05:51+00:00): Connection Vuilcopsekanaaldijk-Bolwerkdok (unclassified).
History [traffic_sign]:
traffic_sign=traffic_sign=NL:C1; "uitgezonderd fietsers en servicevoertuigen windturbines"
Updated into incomplete traffic_sign:
traffic_sign=traffic_sign=NL:C1
description="uitgezonderd fietsers en servicevoertuigen windturbines"
Reverted:
traffic_sign=traffic_sign=NL:C1; "uitgezonderd fietsers en servicevoertuigen windturbines"
History [access]:
access:conditional=no @ (Nov 01-Dec 31; Jan 01-Feb 29)
bicycle:conditional=permissive @ (Mar 01-Oct 31)
foot:conditional=permissive @ (Mar 01-Oct 31)
traffic_sign=NL:C1
vehicle=no
[bicycle:conditional=permissive @ (Mar 01-Oct 31)] does not always, not for all Renderers – mitigate [vehicle=no].
Therefore bicycle access might be blocked (f.i. by OpenFietsMap).
(Nov 01-Dec 31; Jan 01-Feb 29) and (Mar 01-Oct 31) are redundant and possibly conflicting tags. Updating one out of three tags is insufficient. Tags should be complementary, which is 
hard to maintain.
To Resolve (Keep it simple & straightforward, “KISS”):
Access (set by traffic_sign only):
- vehicle=no
- bicycle=yes
Gates will be closed in winter period:
[opening_hours=open; Nov 01-Mar 01 off "closed to all traffic due to the risk of falling ice"]
(will be rendered on the Map (f.i. OpenFietsMap): one tag will contain all relevant information).
eggie (2020-05-21 18:53:30+00:00): Dat zeker...  Als je er met vier wielen kunt rijden is het een track
Tilia_J (2020-05-22 11:02:46+00:00): Op deze manier is wel het onderscheid met de iets noordoostelijker gelegen "Grote Loenense Waterval" verdwenen. Ik weet niet beter dan dat er over "de grote" en "de kleine" Loenense waterval gesproken wordt.

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&ei=L6_HXo6kNq6Di-gPpa2h-Ag&q="kleine+loenense+waterval"&oq="kleine+loenense+waterval"
dp7 (2023-05-22 17:31:05+00:00): Sono stato in zona recentemente e questo tratto di sentiero, a mio avviso, è inesistente. Ho verificato su varie carte, più e meno recenti, e in effetti non è riscontrabile. Vedo che su OSM è stato tracciato parecchi anni fa, poi più volte modificato nel corso del tempo.
Chiedo a chi è intervenuto se ha una traccia GPS a disposizione e se può confermare la correttezza di questo sentiero; diversamente a mio avviso andrebbe rimosso, considerata anche l'esposizione e ripidità di questa area.
Steno79 (2023-06-27 18:49:31+00:00): Non saprei, io ho aggiornato il tracciato con l'etichetta trail_visibility = no per lo stesso motivo che ha indicato dp7. Sono d'accordo per l' eliminazione della traccia, non so se l'utente Ataro che l'ha creata ha delle informazioni sull'origine della traccia.
aeonesa (2022-01-02 15:33:04+00:00): Gibt es Quellen für die Lokalisation des ehemaligen GSSD-Ausbildungslagers? ( way: 806931099, v1). Wenn ja sind die OSM konform? Landuse=military ist schon mal grundsätzlich falsch. Das ist schon seit 30 Jahren kein Militärgelände mehr.

Die mir bekannte Quellenlage zur Dislozierung der einzelnen Funktionsgebäude ist äußerst dürftig. Und wenn sind sie für OSM nicht zu gebrauchen. Soweit mir bekannt ist, existieren dort nur eine Treppe und ein paar Fundamentreste von Gebäuden, deren frühere Nutzung nicht eindeutig zuzuordnen ist.  Bitte entsprechend korrigieren!
itineris (2020-12-17 16:32:26+00:00): Szia!

A Pünkösdfürdői gát egy részét valahogy sikerült dupláznod (way 232710416 és 806940174). Az utóbbit töröltem.

Üdv:
Ákos
leveskockaa (2020-12-17 18:44:22+00:00): Szia!

Köszi a javítást, valami ütközés lehetett.

leveskockaa
olo81 (2020-05-22 14:25:09+00:00): Jeszcze przydały by się tagi o współdzielonej lub rozdzielonej ścieżce, albo informacje w uwagach :x
pbnoxious (2020-05-24 17:13:42+00:00): Nachdem du review_requested angeklickt hast: Ich hab mal die doppelten Tags des temporären Containers gelöscht, sonst ist die Bibliothek ja doppelt in der Karte. Außerdem hab ich die Straße die mittendurch gehen würde ebenfalls außer Betrieb umgetragen.
LoLoLP (2020-05-24 17:44:41+00:00): Okay, vielen Dank ist mir im Nachhinein auch aufgefallen, wusste aber nicht wie man die doppelten Tags entfernt.
abrensch (2020-05-24 13:38:30+00:00): Hallo EInsJonas,

mindestens diese Abbiegebeschränkung:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11128329

ist keine Verbesserung, denn die sperrt die Kreuzung.

Schaust Du's nochmal an?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
Amegaz (2020-12-30 08:12:18+00:00): Hi Parzelle13,
In der Osmose taucht der Weg 806943627 als Problem auf, da er als Fußweg markiert wurde, aber in Radrouten vorkommt.
Kannst Du das bitte nochmal prüfen?
Viele Grüße 
Amegaz
Parzelle13 (2020-12-31 10:22:13+00:00): erledigt
Amegaz (2020-12-31 10:41:02+00:00): Super Danke!
eggie (2020-05-21 20:30:25+00:00): Dag Sjoerd   Tip.. Wanneer je amenity=drinking_water  toevoegt zie je een symbool van een waterkraan. 
Dat watertap doet niets op de meeste kaarten..
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-21 21:14:04+00:00): Toegevoegd amenity  drinking_water
user_5359 (2020-05-22 05:46:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/224500623/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
tguen (2020-06-10 00:00:00+00:00): It appears you've made a lot of edits to add 'temporary' access tags, but you haven't added any tags to indicate that they are temporary. How do you plan to ensure the tags are removed, and when?
Reemal (2020-06-12 18:55:09+00:00): Hello tguen,

My name is Reemal and I am a mapper working on the OSM Mapping Team at Lyft.  Thank you for your concern in addressing the temporary tags.  I am adding temporary tags for COVID-19 relief efforts in various parts of the country. Adding notes is also not something that I can do, unless the tags are actionable which they are not (this is frowned upon in the OSM community and OSMwiki).  Currently in OSM the use of the temporary=yes tag refers to the whole feature, and is normally reserved for construction per OSM wiki Proposed features/temporary tags.  Once the restrictions have been lifted, at that time these temporary tags will be removed. Currently there is no exact time frame as all states in the country are in different phases of re-opening. However we are working closely with cities and are proactively notified when the city decides to re-open the streets. I want to assure you we document and maintain a list of each of these tags via changesets and they will be removed once no longer necessary.


Thank you,
Reemal_Lyft
angys (2020-05-22 05:47:56+00:00): Hello from 2020, I hope you can update those road in Seremban district especially near Bandar Seri Sendayan, Nilai, Bandar Enstek and so on. There are so many new development near there and need to update based on MAXAR standard imagery.
hayes9 (2020-05-22 22:44:26+00:00): Please see my response on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85577066
PT-53 (2020-05-29 06:15:13+00:00): Hallo Harald,
in keep right wird 
für diese Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7546101214/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2924695817
ein Hinweis "mehrere Punkte an einem Fleck, Punkt 2924695817" angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=47.6437&lon=9.99055&zoom=19&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C20
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-06-10 06:40:20+00:00): Hallo Harald, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
luisforte (2020-05-21 20:40:05+00:00): Hi, in fact this can't be considered a relation. Not even a valid multipolygon, as it has only one member. It's a simple polygon, relation should be deleted.
It's name ought to be deleted also. "Poço" means waterwell in portuguese, and so name has its tag value.
cheers, luis
VLD083 (2020-05-26 18:24:12+00:00): Thanks for the pointers Luis. I removed the relation and added the tags to the polygon instead.

Julia
eggie (2020-05-21 21:00:11+00:00): Dag Siebren.. Wat je hier hebt gedaan is het gebouw verwijderd.. Dat rendert niet meer als gebouw maar als een winkelgebied. ... building=yes   desnoods building = retail.
landuse=retail is niet correct.
Verder is water=reservoir ook niet de juiste tag. Beter weghalen. 
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85572684
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-21 21:09:47+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik weer hersteld. naar building=retail   .... landuse=retail is geen tag voor een gebouw.
camelCaseNick (2020-07-01 23:16:32+00:00): Hey,
the Aldi should have been a brand:wikidata=Q41171373, right? (It is Aldi Nord in Belgium?)
CamelCaseNick
Pol Dellaiera (2020-07-02 10:11:17+00:00): Yes ! I made a mistake. I will fix it in a minute. Thanks for reporting!
Pol Dellaiera (2020-07-02 10:13:09+00:00): Okay, it's fixed ;-)
mike140 (2020-05-23 18:56:23+00:00): для выравнивания углов зданий используйте клавишу Q
SammysHP (2020-05-22 11:24:35+00:00): Moin KartoGrapHiti,
 
soweit ich weiß, ich Radfahren hier nur von 20 bis 8 Uhr erlaubt (früher gar nicht, wenn ich mich richtig erinnere). Ich schaue aber nochmal nach.
 
Viele Grüße
SammysHP
 
PS: Aussagekräftige Änderungssatz-Beschreibung wäre auch hilfreich gewesen. ;)
KartoGrapHiti (2020-05-22 12:08:24+00:00): Danke. Das stimmt. Ich habe es ergänzt.
nevw (2020-05-22 02:18:41+00:00): Hi
are these campgrounds public or are you marking PA Wesleyan Church historical campsites or are they from a camping book?
robmacca (2020-05-22 03:06:13+00:00): No, sorry, these are just sites where we stopped for the night before continuing on our journey.
Sorry... new to all this and was surprised to see this pop up on OSM. How can I remove it as its not a proper camping spot?
nevw (2020-05-22 03:45:59+00:00): Hi, I assume they can be deleted from maps.me but it is easy for me to do. I’ll do it today. Thanks for replying so soon.
nevw (2020-05-22 05:44:22+00:00): Reverted as requested by robmacca.
aharvey (2020-05-22 07:42:35+00:00): @nevw you can't delete from maps.me, all you can do is "this no longer exists" which will add a note.

@robmacca, in maps.me you can use bookmarks for adding pins just saved on your phone, but the add "Add a place to the map" does indeed add it to OSM. No big deal, we see a lot of people make the same mistake. If you do come across real ones missing on the map, please do keep adding them.
robmacca (2020-05-22 10:53:35+00:00): Ok thanks... I just uploaded a tracklog with waypoints on a upcoming trip and this might be how I made the mistake... Need to spend some time to learn about all this....
robmacca (2020-05-22 10:57:25+00:00): Just checked Maps.me and cannot see any of those waypts (nodes) not sure how they got there via Maps.me as I haven't been using maps.me for a while
b-unicycling (2022-08-27 07:28:29+00:00): Could you specify what you mean by "stile=br"?
user_5359 (2020-05-22 19:45:23+00:00): Hello! I assume you mean lanes:bus:conditional  instead lanes:bus:.
mf8s003j (2020-05-22 20:36:40+00:00): Oh my goodness, yes, that's exactly what I mean.
mf8s003j (2020-05-22 20:37:28+00:00): @user_5359: I deleted "backward" or "forward" from "lanes:bus:backward"
eggie (2020-05-21 21:41:20+00:00): Molenwweg.. spelfout?
mavl (2020-05-22 05:25:37+00:00): Hello. This changeset ignores the real situation on the ground and was reverted partially.
Burricane (2020-05-22 23:04:05+00:00): Hello mavl, thanks for letting me know. If I understand correctly, the highway classification of these highways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/159678833, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268666548, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268629484) is based on the ’surface’ tag. Could you point me towards the OSM Wiki policy you’re referencing in your changeset source? I was basing my edits off of this policy page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway#Значения.