piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
andi9876 (2021-02-17 22:20:30+00:00): Edited.
https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/images/intersection-modeling/3way_bidir_and_dual_carriageway_intersection_single_point.png
bhar_gavi (2021-02-18 09:20:25+00:00): Hello andi9876,

Thank you for modifying the junction. Please do let us know if this is the preferred configuration and should we follow a similar approach while mapping similar geometries in the future?

Thank you!
andi9876 (2021-02-18 09:31:28+00:00): That's would be pretty good! Greetings.
!bm (2021-02-17 08:26:12+00:00): Hey,
wieso https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657069408 footway=sidewalk? scheint falsch, vgl anschließende *=crossing.
--bg!bm
StefanHRT (2021-02-17 08:37:44+00:00): Moin bm. Hast Recht, hatte da vorhin nur einen der Mittelinselpunkte gefunden und entfernt, aber nicht mehr auf die Wegdefinition geachtet.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-17 10:33:30+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this and it looked good, so not quite sure why you've then deleted it?
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-17 10:35:29+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.
aweech (2021-02-17 16:50:13+00:00): Hi,
In this edit you changed oneway=no to oneway=yes. This was an incorrect change as there are no one-way signs and the road is not designed like a one-way. Also, it was already tagged as oneway=no. Also, in changeset 99430216 you also added oneway=yes incorrectly at an intersection. Please be sure to verify with street-level imagery before adding oneway=yes at intersections like these.
jyotkuma (2021-02-19 07:23:10+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of directions, will ensure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
jyotkuma.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:25:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
andi9876 (2021-02-17 09:07:34+00:00): Deleted.
aceman444 (2023-02-15 20:33:06+00:00): Zdravim, takto prosim nie, ta jedna mala budova nie je Relaxpark jazierko. Ako vidite, to uz je zakreslene na celom areali. Dakujem za pridanie adresy, ale obec sa teda vola Vysoke Tatry, Tatranska Lomnica je len mestska cast.
andi9876 (2021-02-17 22:05:15+00:00): Hi, please look newest satellite images like google maps or mapbox. Reverted.
andi9876 (2021-02-17 22:10:57+00:00): Also can look gps tracks. Greetings.
bhar_gavi (2021-02-18 09:18:41+00:00): Hello andi9876,

Thank you for the edits. We tried what you suggested — using Mapbox and OSM’s GPX traces, both support the previous alignment. Could you please look into it, thank you!

Also a note: As per the OSM policy we should not be referring to Google Maps, please do look into these links for more information (https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/sources/#appropriate-sources, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.3F)
Thank you, happy mapping.
andi9876 (2021-02-18 09:27:35+00:00): Sure, not copy! But can view satellite images...
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-17 10:34:54+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.
If it's a cul-de-sac then perhaps it would be better tagged as a residential road, rather than a service road? Depends on its use though.
Dredangler (2021-02-17 16:15:24+00:00): Thank you, I changed it to residential as suggested :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
gscscnd (2021-02-17 22:28:27+00:00): Jest OK.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:44:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Allroads (2021-02-18 21:11:07+00:00): Hoi, de weg die je hebt veranderd Rendierweg is niet correct.
Het Noordelijke fietspa heet Bruggepoort.
Zie dit verkeersbesluit
https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2018-2217.html
Maar vooral ook de bijlage pdf met plaatje
https://repository.officiele-overheidspublicaties.nl/externebijlagen/exb-2018-2226/1/bijlage/exb-2018-2226.pdf

Ook de BGT geeft rendierweg aan op het veranderde stuk.

Data van Google maps is niet altijd correct en overnemen mag niet. OSM regels.
Die boerderij heeft Rendierweg 44, ook een indicatie, dat het anders is.

Ik heb het aangepast.
jeroen891 (2021-02-19 11:41:10+00:00): Goedendag,

Bedankt voor het reageren op mijn wijziging. Ik wil wel even zeggen dat ik dit niet zomaar van google maps pluk. een collega van mij vroeg of ik dit kom aanpassen omdat hij daar het straatnaambord heeft geplaatst.. 

inmiddels heb ik 4 verschillende besluiten voor mij liggen die elkaar allemaal tegenspreken. 

deze situatie ligt op dit moment bij een collega om dit verder uit te zoeken.
Allroads (2021-02-19 13:03:52+00:00): Bedankt voor de reactie.
Het plukken was een vermoeden. 
Had zomaar gekund. Opmerking was bedoeld als een steuntje.
Ik had hier even snel gezocht op Bruggepoort en mijn conclusie getrokken.
https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/resultaten?q=(c.product-area==%22officielepublicaties%22)and((((w.organisatietype==%22gemeente%22)and(dt.creator==%22Dronten%22))))and(((w.publicatienaam==%22Tractatenblad%22))or((w.publicatienaam==%22Staatsblad%22))or((w.publicatienaam==%22Staatscourant%22))or((w.publicatienaam==%22Gemeenteblad%22))or((w.publicatienaam==%22Provinciaal+blad%22))or((w.publicatienaam==%22Waterschapsblad%22))or((w.publicatienaam==%22Blad+gemeenschappelijke+regeling%22)))and(cql.textAndIndexes=%22Bruggepoort%22)&zv=Bruggepoort&col=AlleBekendmakingen
Geen andere besluiten met Bruggepoort.

Dan is de vraag welke procedure er gevolgd moet worden bij het benoemen van een weg of veranderen van een wegnaam, voordat een bord wordt geplaatst.
Waar gepubliceerd.

Besluit openbare ruimte/naamgevingsbesluit

https://www.dronten.nl/mozard/!suite05.scherm1428?mNch=sxtqhkb8k6 zoek je Bruggepoort, wordt er helemaal niks gevonden. Zoekmachines zijn bij vele Gemeenten summier uitgevoerd, niet werkbaar.

Zo maken we wat los, om tot het goede te komen.

Succes, zie wel als het anders wordt en de BGT wordt aangepast, dat was de tricker om verder te zoeken.
jeroen891 (2021-02-19 13:29:42+00:00): We hebben zeker wat los gemaakt en ik ben ook erg benieuwd wat het nu is. zodra ik het juiste antwoord heb zal ik dat ook hier even terugkoppelen.
kapazao (2021-02-22 08:10:46+00:00): Hola, he visto que esta sierra parece estar duplicada, ¿podrías revisarlo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/894582935
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907992391
CQ_2 (2021-02-22 08:22:16+00:00): Gracias por el aviso, hecho!
kapazao (2021-02-22 09:33:31+00:00): Gracias
PT-53 (2021-02-17 18:51:27+00:00): Hallo Bolero,
da die Klinik bereits durch diesen POI
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6679457512/history
in OSM eingetragen war, gab es nun durch Deine Korrektur
ein Klinik (POI) innerhalb einer Klinik (Gebäude).
Ich habe die Klinik-Merkmale an den Gebäuden daher wieder gelöscht.
Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:25:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:41:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:25:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-17 08:42:00+00:00): Sorry, Bing was sole source here
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-17 10:37:13+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this, and it looks good to me, although your description does not seem to match what you actually did.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
EinKonstanzer (2021-09-29 20:01:41+00:00): Hi, I found all this tiny little mountain ranges and wonder if not natural=arete (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Darete) is a more propper tag. Or maby natural=ridge.
marczoutendijk (2021-02-18 13:09:17+00:00): DWG revert by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99526484
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:10:07+00:00): Wurde mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99548503 überarbeitet.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99436120
marczoutendijk (2021-02-18 13:12:58+00:00): DWG revert by
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99526384
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:28:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:10:54+00:00): Wurde mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99548503 überarbeitet
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99436285
chnuessli (2021-02-17 09:04:58+00:00): @sovereign_ch ist dies so legitim ein Bahnsteig eindeutig einer Strasse zuzuordnen? Der Adresspunkt war sicher falsch, wir sollten aber die Möglichkeit haben einen Bahnsteig einer Strass eindeutig zuzuordnen. Lg
SomeoneElse (2021-02-17 16:51:24+00:00):     Hello Bolt003,

    If you're updating OSM on behalf of https://bolt.eu/en/ , I'd expect Bolt to be following:

    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

    which would mean that for any project that you work on an entry is created at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities and anyone who works on one of those projects has an entry in their profile, so that someone who navigates from a changeset of yours to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bolt003 would know about that project (and also what “Bolt” is, in case they do not know).

    One of your colleague's profiles is set up like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bolt001

    Best Regards,

    Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group.
Bolt003 (2021-02-22 10:03:41+00:00): Hello. Thank you for the feedback. I've updated my profile.
SomeoneElse (2021-02-22 10:06:08+00:00): Thanks for that!
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-17 10:40:16+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
Thanks for adding this, it's important to have even little paths like this mapped to show the connections.
When you added the path, you connected it to the residential area, it's best practice not to do that, so I've disconnected them here for you.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-17 14:00:14+00:00): I'm sorry but it's the responsibility of the geocoder to handle `name=` in different features. This is used as the title of the information board, more popular than `title=`. It is clearly proper.
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:11:40+00:00): Wurde mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99548503 überarbeitet
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99437898
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
ALu68 (2021-02-18 20:45:18+00:00): Bitte erste genau hinschauen - Tankstelle ist bereits seit 13 Jahren gemappt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/87112344/history
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:13:11+00:00): Danke - neuer Mapper mit einigen CS
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99438616
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
R0bst3r (2021-02-18 14:20:56+00:00): Hallo raefdski,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Ich weiß aber nicht, ob es eine offizielle Downhillstrecke ist, inoffizielle Wege sollten laut OSM-Community Konsens NICHT eingetragen werden. Mehr Infos findest du unter: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Mountain_biking oder im Forum, z.B. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65160
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99439112
user_5359 (2021-02-18 19:48:01+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte denke daran, dass in OSM die Schlüssel in (britischen) English gehalten sind.Als deutsche Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie beschreibe ich was?“ empfehle ich https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a (Vorsicht: Viele Information damit lange Ladezeiten) Hier besonders https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2025-06-06 10:03:33+00:00): This changeset added incorrect no_straight_on restriction disallowing  through traffic on GA 83.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12328207
SomeoneElse (2021-02-17 09:58:36+00:00): Hello,
You've moved the boundary here - what was the source of this change?
Also, please using more descriptive changeset comments.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:41:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:44:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:28:52+00:00): Updated with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99603958
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99440985
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:47:27+00:00): Updated with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99604874
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99441500
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:47:54+00:00): Wirklich an der stelle ein Automat oder im Shop?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99441575
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-17 10:45:42+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this and it looks good to me.
Some would also add location=roof
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:generator:source=solar
Also I'm not quite sure about the units. The wiki has kW listed as a suitable units, but I think that with solar kWp (peak) is probably suitable.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:generator:output
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-17 13:38:34+00:00): Ciao. Il percorso che hai creato è senza etichette. Devi assegnare delle etichette (tag) per dare un significato al percorso. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99441695
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-17 13:41:41+00:00): Inoltre i tag gpx:time, creati probabilmente partendo da un file gpx, sono da eliminare.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99441695
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:48:16+00:00): Updated with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99604874
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99441702
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:48:59+00:00): Updated with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99604874
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99441702
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:49:40+00:00): Updated with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99604874
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99441859
ALu68 (2021-02-18 20:35:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=car_wash
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:50:33+00:00): Updated with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99604874
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99441963
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:50:56+00:00): Updated with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99604874
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99442050
tux67 (2021-02-19 15:51:59+00:00): Soll das die Firmenzentrale oder ein Bürogebäude sein?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99442119
freeExec (2021-02-18 17:56:05+00:00): Вы используете обозначение бокового пути не по назначению. И industrial - используют для обозначения путей на закрытых территориях, таких как заводы, порты и прочее, а не на путях общего пользования.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Marc_ch (2023-04-20 22:03:37+00:00): Bonsoir,
un quartier ? de quelle ville ?
d'après WP c'est plutot unn place=village au sens osm (un lieu entre la ville et un hameau
Salutations,
Marc
Marc Mongenet (2023-04-20 22:42:18+00:00): Oui, village me semble aussi très bien.

A savoir que pendant un temps, Veyrier était noté comme ville dans OSM.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-17 10:47:05+00:00): Similar comments to the other one, but this looks good too.
RicoElectrico (2021-02-17 11:37:25+00:00): Cześć, tutaj nie ma autostrady. Proszę o niewstawianie fikcyjnych edycji, bo będą one wycofywane. Na mapę nanosimy tylko to, co jest w terenie. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_practice
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-17 13:50:35+00:00): Ciao. Vedo che hai sistemato qui parte delle etichette. I nomi delle highway sono appunto i nomi. Non devono essere messi lì il punto di partenza e quello di arrivo o altro. Se non hanno un nome, non si inseriscono. Se è un nome usato da appassionati di mountain bike, si inserisce in mtb:name. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99442827
ivanbranco (2021-02-20 10:42:00+00:00): Hi,

what does the PA=Ja tag stands for?
BCNorwich (2021-02-17 12:40:04+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This looks like an online business, if there is no physical presence of the company at this location it should not be mapped to OSM. All features on OSM must be verifiable on the ground.

Why not map the location of the business as per your website?

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-02-23 08:16:11+00:00): No response so POI removed as I see nothing to verify it.
tux67 (2021-02-20 16:45:22+00:00): Update with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99651048
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99443327
tux67 (2021-02-20 16:45:40+00:00): Update with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99651048
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99443389
user_5359 (2021-02-20 05:24:45+00:00): Hello (again)! What is the meaning of roof:colour=1? See https://www.osm.org/way/94329685
iWowik (2021-02-20 09:25:06+00:00): Very very black ;)
Sowa1980 (2021-03-05 14:28:02+00:00): ставил цвет крыши, наверное, что то не дописалось, в цифровой кодировке. думаю так.
iWowik (2021-03-17 09:01:48+00:00): Ну вот, же. 
Нормальный же ответ, а не отсылка проверить всё самому на местности или дать вам денег, как в комментарии к было этому пакету правок:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83218404

Но таки user_5359 откатил сию ошибку
tux67 (2021-02-20 16:47:15+00:00): Update with CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99651048
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99443787