piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
luiswoo (2018-04-17 01:59:14+00:00): Неологізми

Неологізми (від гр. neos - «новий» і logos- «слово») — нові слова, що виникають в мові.
Неологизмы (от гр. neos - «новый» і logos- «слово») — новые слова, возникающие в языке.

Приклади:

    Логін — ідентифікатор користувача системи.
    Спам — непотрібна і безглузда інформація, зазвичай реклама.
kreuzschnabel (2019-07-04 06:08:02+00:00): Way #579157424 ist kein Gebäude, sondern eine Art Vorplatz der Paradieskapelle. Kann raus.
KartoGrapHiti (2019-07-04 13:15:30+00:00): Danke für die sinnvolle Korrektur.
dmlu (2018-04-22 10:43:48+00:00): Hi! Just wanted to let you know that you moved a service road into a very strange position (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504518446/history). I fixed it.
Supaplex (2018-04-12 10:25:04+00:00): 請問有改名的公告或報導嗎?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58027172
Lokai (2018-04-12 12:02:04+00:00): Hallo. Was meinen sie mit "nicht auswählbar"?
kschell1 (2018-04-13 04:20:07+00:00): Hallo, die Beschreibung "Unterführung" wäre sachlich korrekt, aber eine "Unterführung" ist als Objekt nicht auswählbar. Daher habe ich Tunnel angeklickt.
Lokai (2018-04-13 07:51:48+00:00):  Moin,
hier die wiki Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tunnel. Falls es sich um eine Röhre (auch eckig) handelt, ist wohl Tunnel richtig. Das ESRI Luftbild gibt nicht genügend her um das zu deuten. Am besten so urteilen wie es vor Ort sich darstellt. Es als Tunnel zu bezeichnen ist für mich aus der Ferne leicht fraglich.
Nakaner (2018-04-12 08:10:10+00:00): Hi counter_striker,

you seem to be part of a organized or commercial editing activity. Please add a note to your profile page at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/counter_striker (editable via https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/counter_striker/account) which states which company/organisation you belong to, who pays you for editing and which software, technology and rules you use to determine which roads you edit.

Please do this before you upload any further edits to OpenStreetMap. If you continue editing without informing the community, we will block your accounts and revert all your edits!

Please tell all your workmates about this message. It applies to all of them.

Best regards

Michael
counter_striker (2018-04-13 08:19:17+00:00): Hello Nakaner, I am a gamer and I have started freelance mapping. I researched and found out OSM is the best of it. Hence, started my edits. I am jobless so cannot keep a company name. Pay and Software are too big things to discuss. I wish I have some workmates. But sadly I do not have any. I would have improved through discussions.
SomeoneElse (2018-04-13 09:03:54+00:00): Hi counter_striker,
You might find some of the links from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact helpful.
Best Regards,
Andy
counter_striker (2018-04-13 09:10:30+00:00): Thank you for the link Mr.Andy. I am really glad to have contact channel information.
CupIvan (2018-07-16 08:09:09+00:00): привет! а что это за линия без тегов? дорога? ещё лес сломался, уголком вылез..
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:28:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
eggie (2018-04-15 18:12:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:29:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
benhamilton (2018-04-12 08:48:54+00:00): ignore comment "This is a one way street (you should only travel in the uphill direction)" it was for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58028478#map=19/-17.73598/168.31682
This is a oneway street, between 'Avenue Edmond Colordeau' and 'Rue De Wales' when on 'Captain Cook Avenue' you should only travel in the south east direction.
benhamilton (2018-04-12 08:47:37+00:00): ignore comment "This is a one way street (you should only travel in the uphill direction)" it was for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58028478#map=19/-17.73598/168.31682
This is a oneway street, you should only travel in the northerly direction on this street.
abakus_uploader (2018-04-12 22:30:43+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
benhamilton (2018-04-12 08:47:11+00:00): ignore comment "This is a one way street (you should only travel in the uphill direction)" it was for https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58028478#map=19/-17.73598/168.31682
This is a oneway street, for this short section, you should only head north-west on this bit of road.
aceman444 (2019-03-17 20:59:24+00:00): Hi, what standards does your fix meet now? You removed office= from the building so now the name of the building is 'alone' and there is no function to the building.
Gabriel Cséfalvay (2019-03-18 14:36:20+00:00): The building is now tagged with a point amenity=studio, studio=radio according to the   OpenStreetMap documentation for radio studios.

If you have suggestions, please write them down directly without questions.
aceman444 (2019-03-23 13:01:45+00:00): And that studio has no name and does not fill the whole building?
I just mean if you wanted to split the studio from the building (which has interesting properties/tags of its own), then it needs to be done logically.
So thanks for changing my office=telecommunication to amenity=studio, but you did a large semantic change, different from just fixing the tag.
Gabriel Cséfalvay (2019-03-30 13:51:49+00:00): The building is usually identified as "Slovenský Rozhlas" by the people according to the letters on the frontage, this is the building's identification. The building's functions is a different story.

I guess the building is owned by the "RTVS" ("Rozhlas a televízia Slovenska") organization, which has there radio broadcasting studios, music recording studios of different sizes, concert venues, offices and probably other premises, and possibly other companies such as refreshments shop or restaurant. I don't see it as a single-purpose building - hence the standalone studio tag.

I don't think there is an official name for the radio studios themselves. It could be named "RTVS" in the map. Please note that RTVS operates more then one radio stations - the studio tag can't be assigned to a certain radio station by name.

The office=telecommunication tag on the building was incorrect, because it's not a telecommunication company's office. RTVS is primarily a content provider and production company, not a telecommunication operator.
Nakaner (2018-04-17 22:31:13+00:00): Hi,

you seem to be part of a paid/organized/commercial editing activity. Please add a note to your profile page at openstreetmap.org (editable via your user settings at openstreetmap.org) which states which company/organisation you belong to, who pays you for editing and which software, technology and rules you use to determine which roads you edit.

Which website do you use to edit OpenStreetMap (content of address bar please)? iD 2.4.1 is not running at openstreetmap.org.

Please add that information and answer all questions before you upload any further edits to OpenStreetMap. Otherwise we will block your accounts and revert all your edits!

Please spread this message among your workmates. It applies to everyone of your "team".

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:27:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:28:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:29:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
frosm (2018-06-16 18:17:57+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu sur openstreetmap
lorsque vous ajoutez des renseignements sur des voies vertes, n'hésitez pas à les ajouter sur les objets existants au lieu de faire 2 chemins superposés :)
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:26:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:30:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
SomeoneElse (2018-04-12 12:15:52+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain the source of "Changed road Access information" here please?
Best Regards,
Andy
Allroads (2018-04-12 19:21:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39821644

Waarom haal je hier ford=yes weg? Deze track gaat echt wel door de beek.
Allroads (2018-04-12 19:25:50+00:00): Zie net ook, JOSM, dat je de track los gekoppeld hebt, wat is je reden daarvoor?
padvinder (2018-04-12 21:10:23+00:00): Het was een vergissing. Ik had niet gezien dat er al een 'ford' aangegeven stond en voerde dat daarom per abuis een 2e keer in. Naar mijn idee heb ik het weer netjes gerepareerd.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:28:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:28:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:27:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
SomeoneElse (2018-04-12 12:13:20+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain the change you made here?  I don't understand what "not routable path" means.
Best Regards,
Andy
aceman444 (2019-03-23 13:09:27+00:00): Hi, the 3D shape of the building is still incorrect, the way 5215475 should have the maximum height of all the parts, if e.g. way 277448084 is only a building:part. I know you didn't want to fix it all, but adding the incorrect height and building:levels may have actually made things worse. Also, why do you think the building parts have incorrect heights? Do you have some source for the 3D shape of the building?
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Lilla Elna (2018-11-18 00:22:18+00:00): Using outdated imagery leads to the termination of all the features mapped in this changeset. Be more careful!
ForstEK (2018-11-18 09:54:38+00:00): Why do you mean that imagery was outdated? Are you local mapper?
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:31:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:28:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
ohligser (2018-06-09 16:35:38+00:00): Hallo michawtal,
Du hast vor einer Weile den Kreuzungsbereich polnische Mütze bearbeitet. Als Quelle nennst Du "Bing aerial imagery".
Kann das stimmen? Ich meine, die zugelassenen Bing-Bilder sind unverändert Jahre alt, die Zulassung neuerer wäre mir neu.
Gleichfalls ist die Kreuzung nicht so alt wie die Bilder. Ergebnis: Auf vorliegenden Standard-Bildquellen sehe ich die aktuelle Kreuzung gar nicht. Worauf basieren Deine Änderungen dann?
Gruß, ohligser
Milad s (2018-04-12 10:01:35+00:00): Ok
Milad s (2018-04-13 17:44:18+00:00): True
Road–Runner (2018-04-12 10:43:35+00:00): Und wieso wurden die ganzen Hotels zu den Busrouten hinzugefügt? Die Relationen kennzeichnen Haltestellen, ansonsten gehört hier nichts rein!
Familie Stubenböck (2018-04-12 11:43:02+00:00): Achso, ich dachte damit kann man angeben dass man nahe einer Haltestelle ist. Ich dachte dafpr sind relationen (Beziehungen). Ich kann ja Punkte selber als Haltestellen definieren.
uks (2018-04-12 18:24:30+00:00): Вы совершаете систематические ошибки при добавлении адресной информации. Ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста, с правилами адресации: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses#.D0.9F.D1.80.D0.B8.D0.BC.D0.B5.D1.80.D1.8B.2C_.D0.BE.D1.81.D0.BD.D0.BE.D0.B2.D0.BD.D1.8B.D0.B5_.D1.81.D0.BB.D1.83.D1.87.D0.B0.D0.B8
Mir76 (2018-04-18 06:19:10+00:00): А как тогда на станцию Таватуй машины ездят?
Road–Runner (2018-04-12 10:36:52+00:00): Hallo, Vielen Dank für den Eintrag. Parks sind jedoch immer öffentlich zugänglich https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpark, daher bitte eher "Garten" setzen (mit erlaubter Zugang "customers" oder "private"). 
Ansonsten noch viel Spaß hier.
Basstoelpel (2018-04-15 18:33:29+00:00): Hi elektroll,

in addr:city sollte der postalische Ort angegeben werden. Hier also vermutlich Waibstadt. Der Ortsteil kann optional mit addr:suburb getaggt werden.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
abakus_uploader (2018-04-12 22:30:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Milad s (2018-04-12 10:50:42+00:00): Ok
Milad s (2018-04-13 17:43:25+00:00): True
Familie Stubenböck (2018-04-12 11:52:24+00:00): Ich bitte Sie, nicht einfach unsere Kategorie zu ändern. Wir sind die Besitzer von Riedz Apartments und entsprechen trotz unseres alternativen Angebotes am ehesten der Hotelkategorie und werden so auch besser gefunden.
freebeer (2018-04-13 19:54:11+00:00): I see you have changed your entry back to tourism=hotel, but when I read your `description' entry, you refer to a small guest house with four apartments.
That is not a hotel, and does not at all qualify as one in OSM despite what you may wish, where tourism=apartments perfectly fits your description.
OSM maps the ground-truth, and does not exist to help your Apartments to be depicted and found as a hotel, that is Tagging For The Whatever, Renderer, App, ...
Road-Runner's change to tourism=apartments should be put back into effect.
Road–Runner (2018-04-30 20:19:14+00:00): ich glaube euch, dass ihr am besten wisst in welche kategorie ihr fällt, doch trotzdem haben wir uns hier auf osm auf bestimmte konventionen geeignet. und wie wir eurer website entnehmen können, richtet ihr euch an selbstversorger und das fällt bei uns in die kategorie apartment und nicht hotel. siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dapartment
milet (2018-04-12 13:30:03+00:00): Hallo,

Ich hab eine kurze Frage: Auf welcher Grundlage (Karte, Luftbild, ...) nimmst du denn die (geometrischen) Veränderungen vor?
Mir ist nämlich bereits bei einigen deiner anderen Bearbeitungen aufgefallen, dass die Anpassungen an Gebäuden usw. teilweise eher eine Verschlechterung zu vorher darstellen.
Hier an der Orangerie ist es jetzt ziemlich deutlich: Die Hauswand und der angrenzende Weg verlaufen jetzt mitten durchs Gebäude.
Das präziseste, was uns momentan in Erlangen zur verfügung steht, ist nach meinem Wissen das "Erlangen Luftbild (2016 5,0cm)". Diese Aufnahmen haben hohe Auflösung, gute Lagegenauigkeit und wenig Verzerrung. Bei den markanten Gebäuden und Orten in der Stadt, kann man ausserdem häufig auch davon ausgehen, dass sie bereits sehr exakt eingetragen sind.

Tschau :-)
PT-53 (2018-05-18 05:38:15+00:00): Hallo Cherub,
beim Rothaus wird im OSM-Inspector jetzt - nach Deiner Änderung des Tannwaldweges von service auf track - nun eine Fehlermeldung islands angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.70335&lat=47.93456&zoom=18&opacity=0.92
.
Die Gaststätte ist ja dauerhaft geschlossen. Werden die Gebäude dann jetzt anderweitig genutzt? Dann sollte die  Zufahrt wieder auf service - mit eventuellen Nutzungsbeschränkungen - gesetzt werden.
Wenn die Gebäude nicht mehr genutzt werden und verfallen könnte man die Wege auf dem Rothaus-Gelände auf track setzen.
.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
.
Grüße
gurglypipe (2018-04-12 14:10:44+00:00): I think you need to remove name=Haverbreaks from the landuse=residential area for that bit of town, now that you’ve added the suburb node. Otherwise the name gets rendered twice. Same for other suburbs, if a name is set on the residential area.

I think a suburb node is preferred over putting a name on the landuse area, since it means the name can be placed more appropriately on the map, and complex landuses don’t need to use multipolygons.
Casey_boy (2018-04-12 17:23:36+00:00): Done. I note that Lancaster had a mix of use between using nodes and naming landuse areas. Not sure which is better but have gone for nodes based on your comment.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58041882
gurglypipe (2018-04-13 09:10:48+00:00): 👍
eggie (2018-04-15 18:11:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
user_5359 (2018-04-15 05:58:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your object please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
whalerich (2018-04-12 11:55:22+00:00): * в Шише
joost schouppe (2018-10-16 16:04:26+00:00): Hi,
I have downgraded this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579243323/history from tertiary to unclassified. It does not seem logical otherwise
zors1843 (2018-04-12 12:57:59+00:00): The path you added is not properly connected to other paths
gscholz (2018-04-13 04:38:00+00:00): Hola,
this changeset has created several broken relations:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-77.81882&lat=-8.91647&zoom=10&opacity=0.75

Can you please fix this?

Saludos
Guido
user_177389 (2018-04-13 05:42:40+00:00): Thank you for the hint, I can not find out errors in osmi and changed data too, please tell me the element type (way, relation) and their id.
gscholz (2018-04-14 06:08:24+00:00): Hola,
this error has obviously been fixed mean while or a temporary false negative of osmi.

Sorry for the confusion.

Saludos 
Guido
Milad s (2018-04-12 12:07:35+00:00): Ok
Milad s (2018-04-13 17:42:59+00:00): True
pavani_03 (2019-01-23 04:11:23+00:00): Hi,

While working on one of Indonesian city(Banjarmasin) came across your edits where a stretch of road is marked as service 
As per OSM wiki roads are marked as service if it is giving access to building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc.
Please suggest

OSM wiki link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
Ezagren (2019-01-23 15:41:08+00:00): this is mining hauling road
Gumeg (2018-04-13 07:19:57+00:00): Добрый день!
Комментарии однотипные у вас про Калужскую обл., в том время, как мапите в Тольятти.
И ещё просьба в источники данных указывать откуда адреска. Под полем комментария есть пункт "Добавить поле:источники". Откуда брали адресную информацию?
Milad s (2018-04-12 12:27:30+00:00): Ok
Milad s (2018-04-13 17:41:44+00:00): True
chnav (2018-04-12 14:36:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101388133  

Не надо удалять улицу, достаточно поставить запрет на проезд любыми способами (construction или access), а потом поменять назад. Если что-то непонятно - спросите на форуме, всегда подскажут.
freeExec (2018-04-12 13:44:33+00:00): Оно же там сто лет стояло
bekreyev (2018-04-13 05:59:14+00:00): и стоит, рядом ещё одно здание нагородили.
Иди проверь, я ходил вчера ещё раз проверил :)
user_5359 (2018-04-13 17:03:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
Президент Ирака (2018-11-06 23:15:00+00:00): Hi, please notice you duplicated tags on several nodes in this case it is not a problem at all, I fixed it, but please be more careful in the future
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5548037119/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5548037115/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5548037074/history
gscholz (2018-04-14 05:49:21+00:00): Hola,
this changeset has created osm errors regarding duplicated nodes:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-66.11382&lat=-17.39330&zoom=18&opacity=0.74

Can you please fix this?
Saludos
Guido
dvdhoven (2018-04-25 09:47:59+00:00): Even opmerking:
traffic_signals op een eenrichting weg krijgen geen traffic_signals:direction. De richting is automatisch bepaald door de eenrichting. Alleen op een tweerichtingweg moet er een direction bij om te bepalen voor welke rijrichting de direction geldt.
Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
ma-rt-in (2018-04-14 10:09:56+00:00): Moin,
eine Anmerkung zum Way 24962545:
access=destination bildet nicht richtig die deutsche STVO ab. Mit diesem Tool kannst du schnelle prüfen, welche tags an das Objekt gehören: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Gruß
Martin