piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2016-09-29 14:35:57+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Punkt, die nur einen Namen besitzen sind sinnlos. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a . 

In Deutschland wird ein erweitertes Taggingschema verwendet, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Weiche
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
woodpeck_repair (2016-09-30 21:31:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552891 where the changeset comment is: reverts of further edits in India that were connected to the broken midhu ones
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
woodpeck_repair (2016-09-30 21:31:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552891 where the changeset comment is: reverts of further edits in India that were connected to the broken midhu ones
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
woodpeck_repair (2016-09-30 21:31:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42552891 where the changeset comment is: reverts of further edits in India that were connected to the broken midhu ones
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
gileri (2016-09-29 21:58:00+00:00): Bonjour Victo*r et bienvenue sur OSM,

Les modifications faites par les éditeurs tels que iD sont répercutés dans la base OSM globale.

Cela veut dire que les modifications effecutées seront présentes dans des applications et cartes utilisées par un grand nombre d'utilisateurs.

Pour faire des tests il est possible d'utiliser cette instance OSM : http://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/

Merci de corriger ce noeud
chnav (2016-10-03 09:34:29+00:00): Пожалуйста ничего не удаляйте пока не наберетесь опыта. Если геометрия дороги неправильная - исправляйте её, а не рисуйте заново. всё откатил обратно, в т.ч. удаленный мост и пр.
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-09-17 02:36:52+00:00): Hi Peter Struwwel. I changed the classification and geometry  of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/444878773). I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou
Alecs01 (2016-09-29 20:21:25+00:00): Ciao, a quale strada di riferisci? puoi dividerla (con ID, selezionando un nodo e cliccando sull'icona delle forbici) e aggiungere oneway=yes al solo tratto a senso unico (e magari oneway=no a quello che non lo è, è uno dei casi in cui può avere senso).
chnav (2016-10-03 09:42:20+00:00): Восстановил дворовые проезды. Требуют уточнения геометрии, например их хорошо видно на спутниковой подложе Mapbox.  
Дворовые проезды помечаются тегом highway=service
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:57:06+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
km2bp (2016-12-20 20:28:48+00:00): Ulica Leopolda Infelda fizycznie nie istnieje . Zwracam uwagę bo ciekawi mnie na jakich przesłankach bazowałeś podczas jej tworzenia . Czyżby podpatrywanie Googli , tam jest ten sam błąd. Zresztą już ją  skasowałem. Pozdrawiam !
RicoElectrico (2016-12-21 15:34:55+00:00): Masz napisane źródło w tagach zestawu zmian. No ale ja tam też nie znalazłem takiej ulicy, w TERYT też nic nie ma.
krokodyl (2016-12-21 17:31:12+00:00): Panowie. Źródło zostało wskazane.
Nazwa Leopolda Infelda została nadana nowej ulicy na Osiedlu Uczonych uchwałą nr LVI/673/02 Rady Miasta Zielona Góra z dnia 25 czerwca 2002 r. 
Szczegółowy przebieg, załącznik do tej uchwały, dostanę na dniach.
Ulica w TERYT-cie istnieje i ma swój SYM 06902 ul. Leopolda Infelda.
sip.zielonagora.pl zgłosił błąd w w replikacji danych, sprawa została przekazana do procedowania firmie, która się zajmuje tymi danymi.
Życzę dobrego wzroku w nowym roku.
km2bp (2017-01-21 12:07:23+00:00): Może była ta ulica w urzędniczych planach do których realizacji nigdy nie doszło. Na Googlach też jest błędnie zaznaczona. A faktycznie jest tam tylko las i nic nie wskazuje nawet na to żeby jakaś budowa miała się tam rozpocząć . Ja nie jestem zbytnio doświadczonym mapowiczem . i nie wszystko jeszcze rozumiem przy mapowaniu.  Do nieaktualnych zdjęć lotniczych i satelitarnych podchodzę  z dystansem . zakładając to że po kilku latach mogło dużo się pozmieniać. A wszelkie  edycję map których dokonuję. Opieram na osobiście zebranych śladach GPS . Owszem popełniam jak każdy drobne błędy przy rysowaniu , nieraz zapomnę dodać węzły lub usunąć zbyteczne tagi  "Fixme" Ale generalnie staram się nie rysować tego czego istnienia osobiście nie potwierdziłem wizją lokalną.  Pozdrawiam !
Jbowkett84 (2016-09-29 11:13:48+00:00): The area of the the border between Kurdistan (Kurdish Iraq) and Iran has been heavily mined since the Iran/Iraq war. It's highly advised that you take a knowledgeable guide with you if you intend to hike or climb in Kurdistan.

In this area a map of minefields can be found at the Visitor Centre of the Halgurd & Sakran National Park in Choman. 

The contributor has made some effort to add some points on the map to illustrate that care should be taken, but this is not an exhaustive list.

If anyone knows of a better way to add minefields as an areal extent in OSM please let the contributor know.
ika-chan! UK-USA (2016-10-03 21:55:56+00:00): This is quite a big changeset, but where are the changeset comments? Otherwise, we don't know the reason for it.
JayCBR (2016-10-04 11:37:01+00:00): you know who i am and that everything i do i backed by official sources and common sense, do i need to explain every single thing?
ika-chan! UK-USA (2016-10-04 13:19:48+00:00): Simple notes like "Road classifications updated according to OKXE" or "Landuse and local roads added" will do perfectly fine. Many experienced mappers like me and woodpeck (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/woodpeck/history) do that.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
Nakaner (2016-09-29 15:04:24+00:00): Hallo planigra,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz angegeben, Pläne verwendet zu haben. Um welche Pläne handelt es sich? Wo findet man diese? Unter welcher Lizenz stehen diese?

Warum hast du die Konstanzer Straße 12a und 14 in 10707 Berlin-Wilmersdorf gelöscht? Bitte beachte, dass bei OSM der On-the-Ground-Grundsatz gilt. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verifiability

Dir ist bekannt, dass wir in Berlin besser Luftbilder als Bing haben, die wir nutzen dürfen? Die 20cm-Orthophotos des Senats sind für uns freigegeben. Da sie jedoch nur als WMS zur Verfügung stehen, kannst du sie nur mit dem OSM-Editor JOSM nutzen, nicht mit dem Online-OSM-Editor iD, den du verwendest.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner-repair (2016-09-29 14:56:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42521407 where the changeset comment is: revert MAPS.ME edit which added names which are names of other objects
Nakaner-repair (2016-09-29 14:54:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42521339 where the changeset comment is: revert MAPS.ME edit which added names which are not names
Nakaner-repair (2016-09-29 14:53:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42521317 where the changeset comment is: revert MAPS.ME edit which added names which are not names
southglos (2016-09-30 21:50:33+00:00): Ha!  Not a problem; hope you didn't mind me making a few tweaks to your edits earlier - the footpath and hedge were a little tangled up.  Keep the edits coming - could do with more footpaths mapping :-)  Cheers!
glglgl (2018-06-07 11:31:15+00:00): Diese beiden Änderungen waren sicherlich irrtümlich, oder?
Nakaner (2016-09-29 15:19:19+00:00): Dear GinaroZ,

I hope you are aware that the Automated Edits Code of Conduct also applies to edits like this? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

An edit is "automated" in the terms of this guideline even if it is done manually using JOSM or Level0. An edit is automated if not every object is checked manually.

Best regards

Michael
GinaroZ (2016-10-10 23:21:03+00:00): Hi, I was aware of it but didn't think I'd need to make a big deal of it on the mailing list as it was clearly detailed in the changeset comment what I had carried out. 
Although it was technically automated I did check each one in the editor, and it was clear there was a mistake when each POI was originally tagged.
Obviously I'd like to comply with it in future, especially as there are some other tags which are in need of fixing and are less clear-cut than this change. 
Do I need to make a mailing list for every small tagging change (eg typos, plurals, capitals) or just the big changes?
Cheers
Nakaner (2016-10-10 23:33:56+00:00): Hi GinaroZ,

an edit has to be discussed if you do not look at each object you edit. If you take the time to look at all of them, it's ok. The problem of such edits like this is that they are hiding the real problems (e.g. bad imports using strange tags). See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F for a more detailed explanation.

Best regards

Michael
woodpeck (2016-11-13 00:22:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections between e.g. rivers and roads or other separate entities.
datendelphin (2016-10-01 09:58:39+00:00): Thank you for contributing to OSM. I live near by and passed by this Street and building this morning. I do not (yet?) see any indication of Werkstattgasse or an office of Specialized. Maybe you have more information tha is visible on the ground?
For the tagging: now you named just the building Specialized. But probably you meant that there will be an office or a shop in the future, so you should tag it as an office or a shop.
Jan_T_ (2016-10-03 07:11:25+00:00): Hey good morning!
The city is late adding signs. We are sitting here in the office working! Come by and we'll get you a coffee!
The street has been added to the Grundbuchamt already. 
Unfortunately we cannot add advertisement on the outside of the building because of heritage protection :(
datendelphin (2016-10-03 19:48:54+00:00): Thank you :)
I see, yes they are quite slow some times.

If I'm reading the interwebs right, this is a research and development office? In that case you could add an office=research tag (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office)
Nice work.
woodpeck (2016-11-13 00:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections between e.g. rivers and roads or other separate entities.
Alecs01 (2016-11-12 19:24:50+00:00): This changeset created 635 nodes, most of them joining ways on different layers which shouldn't be connected
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:21:27+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
aseerel4c26 (2016-10-03 15:43:35+00:00): Zu dem kleinen Node-Verschiebe-Missgeschick siehe Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42601985
Commodoortje (2016-10-04 10:48:13+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Ik zie dat je diverse tags heb aangevuld op het gebouw. Instock is (nog niet) de naam van het pand. De naam van het pand is op dit moment nog "Norma"  in OSM.
Vermoedelijk zal dit Instock moeten zijn?
Probeer het maar aan te passen, mocht het niet lukken laat het dan even weten.
PS. De name:nl=Instock overbodig in Nederland. 
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Øukasz (2016-09-30 00:43:07+00:00): Hi there, thanks for contributing to the placenames.

I think you've been replacing scripts in some tags. Can you get in touch so we chat how to do it in a consistent way? There's some write-up (not complete yet) at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Iraq for the time being.

Cheers
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
mueschel (2016-10-04 08:26:18+00:00): Hi,
opening_hours as on this POI should follow a common tagging rule to make them readable by software.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444912070
If google translate is right, this should be correct:
opening_hours = Mo-Fr 09:00 - 17:00
You can test these rules here:
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo-Fr%2009%3A00-17%3A00&DATE=1475569380000&mode=0

Jan
PlaneMad (2016-10-03 19:19:56+00:00): Hi Ekta, you just created an edit that is not real.

Please do not make harmful edits on the map. If you are new, please read http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/introduction/ fist to understand the basics of mapmaking. Let me know if you require help to improve the map.
Cheers, 
Arun
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
Øukasz (2016-09-30 00:50:42+00:00): Why remove the ku-Latn tags?
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
Jakka (2016-09-30 09:16:31+00:00): Is this the real name?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
car_repair ?
Klumbumbus (2017-03-30 21:23:52+00:00): Hallo,
die Blocks Wolkensteiner Straße 1-7 und 9-15 und Erdmannsdorfer Straße 32-38 wurden vor längerer Zeit abgerissen. Daher hatten die Umrisslinien zuvor auch extra den Hinweis "Gebäude abgerissen". siehe https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=42521047 Bitte beachte, dass das bing-Luftbild in Chemnitz von 2012 ist und daher darauf einiges veraltet ist. Es sollte daher meist nicht einfach ohne Vorort-Kontrolle vom Luftbild abgemalt werden.

VG
Stefan
Self-Perfection (2016-09-29 17:49:07+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Я вижу вы принялись за правки с выравниванием объектов, и при этом правок у вас мало, т.е. вы почти новичок. Я на всякий случай хочу обратить внимание, что спутниковые снимки могут быть существенно смещены относительно реальных координат объектов и это стоит отслеживать. Подробнее в вики http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Использование_аэрофотоснимков
A-LTR (2016-09-30 15:32:29+00:00): Для начала надо все-таки, чтобы и дороги, и все здания были выравнены относительно друг друга, разве их нельзя будет потом группой сразу подвинуть под реальные координаты?
Self-Perfection (2016-10-24 15:30:17+00:00): Спорно. Представим пример: рядом дома A, B, C, D; спутниковый снимок существенно смещён от реальных координат. Пришёл Вася и подвинул дома A и B в реальные координаты. До домов C и D руки у него не дошли.

Потом пришёл Петя, и подвинул дома A и B назад, чтобы все 4 дома были хорошо друг относительно друга выровнены. До разбирательств со смещением и массовых двиганий у него руки не дошли.

Резльутат: 2 человека турдились из лучших побуждений, а реальный выхлоп нулевой.

Мне кажется, что работа будет эффективнее, если браться пусть за небольшие фрагменты карты, пусть всего 1 дом, но сразу делать хорошо.
A-LTR (2016-10-25 20:20:31+00:00): Вы так говорите будто здесь огромнейший сдвиг присутствует, а у пользователей карты нереально точные GPS-трекеры. По-моему, самый простой и объективный способ отрисовать и выравнять объекты (дома и дороги) – взять за основу спутниковый снимок, ибо сдвиг здесь не больше погрешности gps модулей в смартфонах.
Self-Perfection (2016-10-25 22:51:40+00:00): Я встречал в Москве смещения снимков Bing до 5 м (вне крупных городов бывает куда больше), а усреднение треков, снятых разными устройствами в разное время вполне даёт точность порядка 1м.

Если вам показалось, что я предлагаю вам самому записывать треки и по своим трекам привязывать снимки каждый раз, то это не так. Есть же http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Imagery_Offset_Database
woodpeck (2016-11-13 00:22:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43591545 where the changeset comment is: Reverting those of bonya_23's changesets that created new intersections between more than 10 ways after a complaint to DWG that highlighted several such changesets that were creating intersections between e.g. rivers and roads or other separate entities.
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 07:57:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622301 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42522071, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 07:58:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622310 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42522150, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 07:58:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622312 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42522233, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 07:58:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622315 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42522316, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 07:59:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622324 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42522355, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
JeSe-MX (2016-09-29 20:15:35+00:00): No olvides @Xukula, que los datos que aportas deben ser de conocimiento propio, o que uno mismo se encuentre e el lugar.
Alecs01 (2016-10-02 13:22:00+00:00): Reverted as spam
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-04 08:00:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42622329 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 42522771, see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/2016-October/002696.html
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
bxl-forever (2016-10-05 13:18:21+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the changes you made in recent days.
I am afraid to inform you that "t’Serclaesstraat" in Brussels city centre is to be written with a lower-case "t".  It is named after Brussels Middle Age hero Everaard t'Serclaes.  I know it can be confusing, especially because both Urbis maps and street signs write all street names entirely in capital letters, but this spelling is how Brussels city authorities intended to write it.  I have reverted the changes.
Have a great day and happy mapping.
Glenn Plas (2016-10-05 13:42:10+00:00): I used a document with correct names, it has it in capital T:

Rue T'Serclaes  / T'Serclaesstraat

I found it highly accurate until now.  See  https://github.com/gplv2/urbis-validate/blob/master/docs/straten_brussel.pdf
Glenn Plas (2016-10-05 13:43:38+00:00): I hope that is the only error, The case will probably not matter in geocoding searches.  Tx for the history lessons . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everard_t%27Serclaes
Glenn Plas (2016-10-05 14:08:43+00:00): I fixed the streetname spelling as well, it's important to keep that in sync with the name of the way.  See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42658619