piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jan van Bekkum (2020-01-17 13:04:47+00:00): Sorry for not replying earlier. I am currently traveling on Borneo and have limited internet access.  Thanks for reversing the change, it was an error.

My typical way of working is to collect issues while I am driving and handling them in a batch when I am back home. Because I then upload many changes at once the description must be more general.
kreuzschnabel (2019-08-10 20:55:27+00:00): Marken gehören ins brand-Tag, nicht in Klammern hinter den Namen.
Supaplex (2017-10-01 17:10:32+00:00): 
恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
adrianojbr (2017-09-21 23:34:36+00:00): olá, aguiarjuliano. o pequeno duplicado trecho da br-471;br-392, no viaduto, mantém a classificação da rodovia como um todo. não se recomenda alterar a classificação de pequenos trechos, mas sim mantar a continuidade ao longo da via, a não ser que haja uma mudança significativa na sua estrutura e por um longo trecho. abraço.
MCalaOSM (2017-08-09 21:39:40+00:00): Ciao...Perchè ai cancellato le way?
Non puoi cancellare dati esistenti...ricordati che e un GIS.

Le way che ai cancellato in realtà era la piattaforma della stazione dove scendono i passeggeri non e una strada inesistente, potevi modificarla il tag con railway=platform piu appropiato, senza cancellarlo.

ti invito a vedere il wiki sull'argomento:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dplatform
Guest One (2017-08-14 08:20:13+00:00): Qualcuno le ha ripristinate?
MCalaOSM (2017-08-14 14:39:02+00:00): Certo già fatto.

saluti
Hjart (2017-08-09 14:54:12+00:00): Please do not touch our adressnodes. They are supposed to stay where they are. If moved, they will eventually be moved back to the position they have in our national register.
MCalaOSM (2017-08-09 22:10:45+00:00): potresti mettere tutta l'area come layer =0  per esempio
MCalaOSM (2017-08-09 22:09:03+00:00): Scusami ma le way  che ai creato non mi sembra un ponte, sopra di essa ce la ferrovia. 

leggi qui:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:bridge
MCalaOSM (2017-08-09 22:25:14+00:00): Credo che non puoi mettere landuse=yes e già implicito 

devi utilizzare tag e valori qui http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Landuse

altrimenti non la mappi se non ci sono tag provvisori.

il name non puoi utilizzarlo come un descrittore usa se devi per forza il tag

ti invito a leggere questo:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:description
dgitto (2017-08-10 15:15:25+00:00): E vabbè Mariano che sarà mai. meglio così che non mettere nulla. ci sarà sempre tempo per migliorare i dettagli. Tanto questa zona è abbastanza coperta dai mappatori (siamo ben 3)
eggie (2017-08-09 15:31:02+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
daveemtb (2017-10-26 15:38:34+00:00): Hi Aubry1, if you change highway=track to highway=bridleway and it's a UK public bridleway, please would you add bicycle=yes and foot=yes as otherwise you are breaking routing for bicycles and possibly hiking too. It might also be good to add physical=track as otherwise you are removing info that may be useful to people such as disability adapted bicycles, tricycles, off road wheelchairs etc.
My recommendation would be to leave it as highway=track and add:
designation=public_bridleway
foot=yes
bicycle=yes
horse=designated
This carries the maximum useful information and works with all routing engines, although it doesn't render as a green dashed line on the default Mapnik render, (though this should be a secondary consideration really)
up to you how you tag ultimately of course! :)
Many thanks!
eggie (2017-08-09 15:34:29+00:00): Scherp gezien.. Hier stond een hele verkeerde tag op van een voorgaande mapper.
mor (2017-08-09 19:42:05+00:00): ¿Por qué borras una calle para volver a dibujarla exactamente igual? Demuestras muy poco respeto por el trabajo de los demás
literan (2017-08-10 12:38:29+00:00): зачем вы удаляете точно прорисованные (по заборам) полигоны landuse=residential и заменяете их одним большим, отрисованным абы как? http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=50975663 Откачу.
Андрей Николаев (2017-08-11 12:05:53+00:00): Принял к сведению. Спасибо!
eggie (2017-08-09 15:42:57+00:00): Beter om niet te beginnen met access=no
Dat doen we bij het witte bord met de rode rand.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50975665

Hier de default accesstags voor Nederland

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands

Alles wat groen is ..is default en hoeft niet getagd te worden.
Verder keurige edits.
dgitto (2017-08-10 14:49:27+00:00): ti giro il "muro". questo tipo di oggetti ha il verso: il lato destro è dove si cade.
dgitto (2017-08-10 14:43:42+00:00): Solo Camomilla? non ha un DUG? (piazza, piazzetta, via, vicolo)
Canyonsrcool (2017-08-09 22:33:05+00:00): Maybe instead of access=no, it could be access=private.
Canyonsrcool (2017-08-09 22:40:05+00:00): From the shadow on imagery, this looks like a cell/communications tower.  These have addresses assigned to them, so I would put the address point back.
Canyonsrcool (2017-08-09 22:41:10+00:00): Maybe amenity=shelter with shelter_type=sun_shelter would be a better tag combination for these.
b-jazz (2018-10-23 20:39:46+00:00): Please find a less offensive way to test proper attribution of OSM next time.
fraret (2017-08-09 15:35:15+00:00): Cal revertir els canvis al transformador
Hjart (2017-08-09 16:02:57+00:00): This is a duplicate of an existing entry and is being removed.
Hjart (2017-08-09 16:01:24+00:00): This is a duplicate of an existing entry and is being removed.
Hjart (2017-08-09 15:59:25+00:00): This was a duplicate of an existing entry and has been removed
Hjart (2017-08-09 16:00:06+00:00): This is a duplicate of an existing entry and is being removed.
Self-Perfection (2017-08-10 10:28:13+00:00): Вы в этом пакете правок создали дорожку https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514278635 , пересекающую забор https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120265538 , и корректно попытались обозначить место пересечения воротами https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5024745649 . Вот только точка ворот оказалась принадлежащей только линии забора (см. перечисление "part of" на странице свойств точки). Это ошибка. Раз ворота не принадлежат дорожке, то и алгоритмы построения маршрута не будут учитывать накладываемые этой калиткой ограничения при построении маршрута по дорожке. Во время редактирования проблему можно было отследить попробовав подвинуть точку калитки (а потом отменить - Ctrl-Z) и заметив, что при этом искажается только одна линия.
Self-Perfection (2017-08-10 10:31:56+00:00): FYI, полезно указывать https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access для калитки, иначе непонятно, закрыта или открыта она, можно ли строить через неё маршрут.
Self-Perfection (2017-08-10 10:37:02+00:00): Ещё просматривая ваш пакет правок я вижу давно бывшую на карте ошибку: есть дороги/дорожки, например https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105695311 , пересечение которых с забором вообще не обозначено. Это совсем ошибка: непонятно, пересекаются ли физически забор и дорожка. Может дорожка мостом проходит над забором, например. Если в пересечении сквозной проход без ворот, то нужно на точке пересечения использовать тег https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:barrier%3Dentrance
Self-Perfection (2017-08-10 10:37:47+00:00): Я не правлю калитку, оставляю вам для тренировки. Исправите сами?
Self-Perfection (2017-08-17 08:33:04+00:00): Перечитал свои комментарии к этой правке и понял, что получились двусмысленными. Ещё раз, точнее: если в физическом мире ворота находятся на пересечении забора и дороги, то и в базе OSM они быть на пересечении, то есть принадлежать и линии забора, и линии дороги. Что можно заметить попробовав сдвинуть точку ворот, при этом должны искривиться обе линии, если искажается только одна, то это признак ошибки.
chillly (2017-08-09 17:34:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM

I think you have tried to show a proposed new road. You haven't added a comment to the edit which would help make that clearer. 

You have added what I think is the new road as coastline. This is very odd, is there any reason for this? 

What is the source for this new road layout? Have you copied this from a plan or official source?

As it stands this edit needs changing then it could be useful, but we generally only add stuff to OSM that actually exists. Has this road been started or is it still just a proposal?
chillly (2017-08-09 18:16:36+00:00): Hi,
It's good you removed the coastline tag. I expected you to respond to my comment, then we could try to help. 

I'm still not sure what your source is. Would you tell me where did you get this information from please.
Colin Smale (2017-08-10 06:48:45+00:00): Hi Rikki, your edits seem to have removed a huge segment of the relation for The Weald (2066141) - can you fix this please? I fail to see the "accuracy improvement" in this edit by the way...
Rikki Glitzkicker (2017-08-10 16:01:33+00:00): Hi Marssen Mapper.My aim was to indicate some newly opened bridleways and footpaths just north of Brighton. I walked them yesterday and wanted to update OSM. I have no desire other than to make our mapping system better and up-to-date wherever and whenever I can.
So I unreservedly apologise for removing part of The Weald (2066141).  Do you know if there is there an easy way for me reinstate your work?
Colin Smale (2017-08-10 17:47:58+00:00): Hi Rikki,
"The Weald" always was a bit of an arbitrary area, just a big diamond shape really. I have no idea if there is an objective boundary in existence... I suggest you just complete the loop again, adding an additional node somewhere around Falmer.
Regards, Colin
PS It wasn't my work...
Rikki Glitzkicker (2017-08-11 06:12:06+00:00): Hi Colin,
I’m pleased to report that I have just reinstated the Weald area on OSM – it took a bit of head scratching and some time, but it had to be done!
By placing a node above Falmer, the boundary no longer cuts across the suburbs of Brighton and follows the (more appropriate) ridge of the South Downs.
So a pleasing end result.
All the best and safe adventuring,
Richard
Colin Smale (2017-08-11 07:12:20+00:00): Cheers!
Seandebasti (2017-08-20 14:07:09+00:00): Hey, warum ist Tabletennis nicht als sportplatz gemapped?
l3BAM (2017-08-09 18:07:17+00:00): Source IGN
SomeoneElse (2017-08-13 13:55:51+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain what " so it appears in the same priority as Wales" means?  Appears where?
Best Regards,
Andy
seattlefyi (2017-08-11 02:46:11+00:00): Hi Zenthere, thanks for editing the map! We definitely appreciate the additions. I've got a few suggestions, but looks like you're getting started, so keep at it! If you have questions, feel free to ask.
dudka (2020-01-20 08:07:32+00:00): тут справді десь є зупинка? ні знаку, ні лавки не бачу, тільки карман є, але яке його призначення неочевидно. Маршрутів громадського транспорту там ніби немає

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/xvxF0PdyrKDZ5C2Q20WsHw

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5024949025
Kilkenni (2020-02-15 20:14:27+00:00): Зараз вже не пам'ятаю, але я мапив по гарячому, коли там був особисто. Враховуючи, що я зазвичай маплю тільки коли є табличка зупинки - скоріше за все, вона там була.
Як зараз - не знаю, це 2 роки тому було.
TourenbikerFKB (2017-08-10 18:11:07+00:00): Hallo mtbbiker99, schön dass du Oberorke bearbeitet hast. Einige deiner Eintragungungen sind aber zu hinterfragen. Warum hast du bei der Kirche building=church in building=yes geändert? Ich habe daraus wieder eine Kirche gemacht. Dann Sauerlandstraße 20 das Gebäude im Garten.. amenity=public_building ist laut wiki veraltet und nicht zur zu benutzen. außerdem: was ist die öffentliche Funktion? Das Grundstück ist ja als farmyard gemappt.
TourenbikerFKB (2017-08-13 16:31:02+00:00): da sich mtbbiker99 nicht dazu äußert, habe ich mal im Ort nachgesehen. Bei einigen Gebäuden war zwar eine Tür offen, aber deshalb sind sie kein öffentliches Gebäude :-). Ich habe den tag entsprechend gelöscht.
mtbbiker99 (2017-10-11 20:04:03+00:00): Hi, sorry, dass ich mich erst jetzt melde. Sollte öffters mal in mein Postfach kucken.
Zu den Punkten:
Kirche habe ich geändert, damit sie im Kartenmaterial richtig dargestellt wird. Ich habe einen zusätzlichen node mit allen Eintragungen hinzugefügt, ist wohl weg...egal geht auch so. Sauerland straße 20 -- war wohl ein Klickfehler von mir.

amenity=public_building ist aktuell

Gibt der OSM eigene Editor Potlatch2  automatisch vor, da habe ich keinen Einfluß drauf.

Gruß Oliver
mtbbiker99 (2017-10-11 20:11:03+00:00): public_building=...... ist veraltet
building=public  ist noch aktuell

Siehe:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Gebaeude

Gruß Oliver
TourenbikerFKB (2017-10-12 04:47:48+00:00): Hallo Oliver, wir mappen nicht für den Renderer. Wenn auf irgendeiner Kartendarstellung (es gibt ja nicht nur eine, sondern viele) die Kirche nicht richtig dargestellt wird, mußt du dich an den Kartenhersteller wenden. Und was Potlatch angeht. im advanced-Modus (kannst du ganz unten anklicken) kannst du frei editieren. Geht viel einfacher, wenn man sich mal daran gewöhnt hat und man vermeidet falsche Vorgaben. Die Referenz sollte normalerweise die wiki sein. Im Zweifelsfall kann man das Thema im Forum diskutieren. Gruß Rainer
dudka (2017-11-05 14:19:53+00:00): чому видалили стару назву вулиці Степана Васильченка?
Aleks_Boy (2017-11-05 14:26:28+00:00): Доброго дня!
По цій вулиці додавав назви транслітерацією та ін мовами. 
Ви маєте на увазі чому просто Васильченка, а не Степана Васильченка?
dudka (2017-11-05 17:30:33+00:00): якщо подивитися історію лінії http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150590079/history то можна побачити що був тег old_name = 12-го Грудня вулиця, але ви його видалили, можливо випадково.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-08-16 12:25:31+00:00): If that mass import is poor, why not delete and revert all poor quality addition?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49785062#map=8/46.881/18.215 included blatantly misaligned nodes landing in a Balaton
grin (2017-08-16 13:07:29+00:00): I see your point but the community haven't decided yet about it. We do know the source, we do know who did it and wny it does look like this, and it's not that simple (reverting is very impolite IMHO). I forward your input to the discussion, though.
gurglypipe (2017-08-09 22:52:42+00:00): Nice one.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:48:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:48:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
GerdP (2017-08-23 08:11:16+00:00): Hi!
Please review typos (?)
highway=U and highway=R
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274965186
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274965185
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/274963729
AwoowoArne (2017-08-23 10:36:20+00:00): Hallo Gerd,
danke für den Hinweis. Habe ich korrigiert.
Herzliche Grüße
Arne
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
literan (2017-08-10 11:45:09+00:00): Геликон-опера давно переехала, не надо вносить фейки
manoharuss (2017-08-10 05:57:28+00:00): Hi Digital Mathbaria,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. May I suggest going through http://learnosm.org/en/ for getting started on tagging schema and common mapping practices.


Thank you.

Regards,

Manohar
manoharuss (2017-08-10 05:58:35+00:00): Population tag is for specifying the count of population in a specific place. Refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:population
Robert Whittaker (2017-08-29 11:46:15+00:00): There seems to be a mistake in the addr:postcode and addr:street tags introduced to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514334703 in this changeset. They appear to belong to an address about 100km away! http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.731777&mlon=-1.250386&zoom=16
Jan van Bekkum (2017-08-29 17:27:38+00:00): I corrected the post code and the street. I believe the rest is correct.
oormilavinod (2017-08-10 06:19:54+00:00): hey VLD010!!  welcome to OSM. appreciate you interest in mapping.  I observed that you have pulled a road accidentally causing bad angled roads. I have corrected the errors happy mapping !!
MCalaOSM (2017-08-14 14:41:27+00:00): Ecco come vedi le ho ripristinate, mi raccomando se hai dubbi chiedi.

un saluto e buon ferragosto.
literan (2017-08-10 12:25:16+00:00): не надо мусорить на карте
oormilavinod (2017-08-10 06:22:28+00:00): hey Conductor Feliz!!  welcome to OSM. appreciate you interest in mapping.  I observed that you have pulled a road accidentally causing bad angled roads. I have corrected the errors happy mapping !!
trapicki (2022-04-11 21:41:45+00:00): Du hast den Wanderweg 443 von Steinalpl bis Neuwald hinunter verlängert. Der Steirische Wanderwegekatalog 2004 nennt für 443 Steinalpl als Ausgangspunkt, Neuwald bis Steinalpl ist nur für 440 genannt. Mir scheint es unwahrscheinlich, dass die Wege so weit ident geführt werden.
Hast du von Neuwald bis Steinalpl 443 markiert/angeschrieben gesehen?
ggrab (2022-04-11 22:29:36+00:00): Die Verlängerung habe ich damals vermutlich gemacht, weil am Wegweiser https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5023826616 der Weg 443 mit dem Ziel "Neuwald" angegeben ist. Es kann natürlich sein, dass das etwas voreilig war, und dass in Wirklichkeit die Angabe am Wegweiser unvollständig ist (es müsste dann 443/440 sein). Leider habe ich keine Informationen über Wegweiser/Wegangaben zwischen Steinalpl und Neuwald.

Außerdem geht der Weg 443 laut Wegekatalog bis zum Schneealpenhaus, ist aber zwischen dem oben genannten Wegweiser und dem Schneealpenhaus auf keinem Wegweiser angeführt. Nur beim Schneealpenhaus hängt eine ziemlich verwitterte rot-weiß-rote Tafel (kein Wegweiser) mit Aufschrift 443. Auch hier sind Wegekatalog und Wegweise also nicht 100% konsistent.
trapicki (2022-04-14 22:37:44+00:00): Verstehe, ein Wegweiserziel ist schon nicht so schlecht (ich muss besser lernen, Wegweiser einzutragen...) 
Der Wegekatalog ist schon ein bisserl älter, da sind sicher Änderungen seit dem passiert. Weil ich das halt gerade in Vorbereitung einer Wanderung aus Graz mache frag ich einmal nach. Der ÖAV hat auch eine Wegedatenbank, in der von den Wegerhaltern die Wege einzgezeichnet werden können, halt über eine OSM :-), ist aber bei weitem nicht vollständig.
Ich frag einmal beim ÖAV Edelweiss als Wegezuständigen nach, was derzeit ihre Intention ist. Vielleicht haben sie ja Info zur spärlichen Markierung am Plateau. Dort kommen viele Wege zusammen, vielleicht wurde der 443 ja wegen Redundanz verkürzt.
GinaroZ (2017-08-10 13:31:55+00:00): Hi, shouldn't https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40936778/ be secondary, as that's the main through road? See the wiki for more info
jc86035 (2017-08-10 11:14:08+00:00): (Just noting that you should use the newly available DigitalGlobe imagery instead of Bing since it's much less distorted and doesn't have any coverage issues here.)
MrKrabs (2017-08-11 20:54:29+00:00): Hello js86035,

Thank you for the message. I did notice that DigitalGlobe is newer and less distorted in this area. I used Bing in this instance because a tree was blocking the road on DigitalGlobe but in Bing you can see that it exists.

Thanks
dgitto (2017-08-10 14:23:53+00:00): Mi chiedo se il nome da inserire nel key name non sia piuttosto "Strada statale 114 Orientale Sicula"?
Non ho guardato documenti ufficiali (solo wikipedia) ma mi pareva che in genere venissero chiamate tutte così.
dgitto (2017-08-10 14:24:40+00:00): parlo chiaramente del tag "name" della relation
fayor (2017-08-10 14:32:03+00:00): Lo so ma io penso che una cosa sia il "nome" e un'altra la "sigla" (il ref) e che mettere nel nome anche il numero della strada sia una ripetizione (per esempio "Autostrada del Sole" e non "Autostrada A1 del Sole")
muralito (2017-08-12 00:59:56+00:00): Hola Humberto, mas alla de lo que muestren las fotos aereas, tengo la casi certeza de que las calles son bien ortogonales (gracias a las Leyes de Indias).

Si podes, contacta a quien relevo, para confirmar y poder ajustar acorde.
Humberto_Yances (2017-08-12 01:09:01+00:00): Hola muralito, los ajustes en la posición de las vías se están haciendo con base en la nueva imágen de Bing, la cual concuerda con las trazas GPX disponibles para la zona.  Algunas no se ven ortogonales ya que aun en estas no se ha corregido el offset anterior.
Humberto_Yances (2017-08-12 02:18:46+00:00): En este changeset hago los ajustes pendientes para mantener la ortogonalidad de las vías http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51048173
calfarome (2017-08-10 06:16:17+00:00): Hello Blizz966,
Thanks for  your map edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Could you please delimit this park with a polygon?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5025364643/history
karitotp (2017-08-10 04:03:08+00:00): Hi Blizz966, thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. You added parks on nodes, you should add them as ways. Thanks 
Karito
Supaplex (2017-10-01 17:21:15+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
dgitto (2017-08-10 14:19:36+00:00): complimenti bei dettagli
fayor (2017-08-10 14:28:00+00:00): Grazie, controllando la relazione della 114 ho notato anche altre inesattezze nella toponomastica, ma non essendo zona che frequento non ho fatto una revisione completa
manoharuss (2017-08-10 05:09:37+00:00): Hi ألبرشت شونك,

Wanted to flag that the translation you have given to this feature in this changeset translates to `Till`. Is it correct?


Thanks and regards,

Manohar
سامبا (2017-08-11 01:23:18+00:00): Hello, thank you for your question.

In Semitic languages generally only consonants or long vowels are written, short vowels are normally not written. So if you see the word only with consonants written, it maybe can have multiple meanings.

The given translation transliterates in "d-s-w" and is the correct one. Between the hyphens there are the vowels e/i and a, but those are normally not written.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-05 22:18:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 51764077, 51763240 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mass removal of 'oneway=yes' on roundabouts performed by user Grauer after seeing this flagged on Osmose; after complaints from the Dutch community the user asked DWG to help with revert.
Supaplex (2017-10-01 17:22:55+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!