piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Minh Nguyen (2018-01-12 10:45:02+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55370218
naoliv (2018-01-12 10:52:39+00:00): Reverted in changeset #55376267
mavl (2018-12-24 23:44:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Minh Nguyen (2018-01-12 10:45:19+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55370233
naoliv (2018-01-12 10:52:42+00:00): Reverted in changeset #55376267
mavl (2018-12-25 00:27:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Supaplex (2018-07-12 15:17:45+00:00): 請問銀行有名稱嗎?
Happy Hobo (2018-07-12 15:31:52+00:00): I think it very likely that the bank has a name, but I have been in five other countries since last January.  Therefore, I cannot tell you the name.
我認為該銀行很可能有一個名字，但自去年1月以來我一直在其他五個國家。 因此，我不能告訴你這個名字。
RobertoJK (2018-01-26 01:30:55+00:00): Ciao, una delle strade che hai inserito ha il tag "residential", che però secondo me non si addice alla strada in questione, che secondo me è più corretto classificare come "track" o al massimo "unclassified". Abito in zona, per questo mi sono permesso di scrivere questo.
Se sei d'accordo, proporrei di modificare quindi il tag.
aldoct (2018-01-26 07:30:43+00:00): Grazie per la segnalazione. Non mi indichi quale sia esattamente la strada, quindi non posso dirti nulla in proposito. Correggi pure se hai conoscenza dei luoghi; nel caso applicassi il TAG track non dimenticare di inserire il tipo di fondo!  Saluti
RobertoJK (2018-01-26 13:47:20+00:00): Scusami, hai ragione! La verità è che sono ancora nuovo e non sapevo come si facesse :) comunque credo che la strada sia "546718045, v2". In ogni caso se vuoi la cambio io stesso, e hai fatto bene a ricordarmi del tipo di fondo, che mi ero scordato di metterlo anche nelle strade vicine!
chachafish (2018-02-08 02:03:18+00:00): Thanks for fixing the previous changeset. While I have you, just so you know, there are a lot of errors popping up on OSM Inspector around the corner of South Yosemite Street and East Mansfield Avenue. There are a lot of buildings here that have a total of about 100 untagged lines on them. Cheers :)
Your Village Maps (2018-02-08 03:20:52+00:00): Yes, that's my recent work.  Did you take a closer look?  If I did not do this correctly, please instruct me on the proper method.  At each end of each untagged line is a node with address information (lowest and highest street address (addr:housenumber) for each building of town homes).  I had seen this done elsewhere some time ago.  If this is a wrong practice, please let me know how it should be done.  Always learning!
chachafish (2018-02-08 04:45:49+00:00): Well, I'm certainly no expert when it comes to this. I was just looking over flagged errors that brought up some untagged lines. The way I handle multiple addresses for one building is like this example: 2138 Eliot Street, Denver. But, there are certainly many different ways to handle this; I think. I did some digging and perhaps your style won't require an untagged line if you designate your untagged lines with a tag, "line" and then use the interpolation technique here?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Using_interpolation -- Once the untagged line is a "line" then a tag, addr:interpolation=even, can be added. But, like I said, I am no expert and I don't know if this will work. Cheers :)
mavl (2018-12-25 00:34:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:43:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:34:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:10:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
vng_me (2018-01-19 11:11:32+00:00): А для чего уже проставленный адрес на доме дублировать еще точкой? Тоже самое про 37 и 35.
Austin Zhu (2018-01-18 04:42:28+00:00): 请勿在县级单位上填写人口，其所属地级市人口已经包含此县人口。
谢谢！
OpenStreetMap China Community
Austin Zhu
mavl (2018-12-24 23:35:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:32:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
zors1843 (2018-01-12 07:40:18+00:00): Dit is de wiki voor historic:monument 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument
Deze tag zou beter passen :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dartwork
Nakaner-repair (2018-07-11 21:12:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60628314.
redrace (2018-01-14 08:55:11+00:00): Hallo
Du hast hier in diesem Changeset Gebäudeumrisse eingezeichnet. Das sieht so aus als wären die mit einem Tracer von NRW-Alkis abezeichnet. Das ist uns zur Zeit nicht erlaubt!
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60528
Du hast es sogar als Source angegeben!
Wenn das der Fall ist, müssen eigentlich deine Eintragungen revertiert werden!
Schöne Grüße
ninjamask (2018-01-15 00:17:15+00:00): Das ist natürlich blöd gelaufen dann. Die sind mit einem Tracer abgetraced.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:27:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
chnav (2018-01-12 13:24:23+00:00): Пожалуйста подтвердите источник данных для ref по Восточно-Казахстанской области. Также просьба комбинировать правки по смыслу и нажимать кнопку SAVE в редакторе iD более осмысленно. Вы сделали 330 changesets за 10 января. Это перегружает базу и затрудняет проверку ваших данных.
chnav (2018-01-12 13:26:40+00:00): По поводу несчетного и бессмысленного количества changesets вас уже просили в сообщении DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1686
mavl (2018-12-24 23:35:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pyram (2018-01-13 15:58:10+00:00): Hi ARATAA,

I saw some errors in your Import  (source=knowledge??) of power lines. Where are this data from?
Technical errors are:
Every node has the tags "cables" "power" and "voltage". That's wrong. Maybe most of this nodes are power=pole instead, but the Aerial view shows partially other positions up to more than 40 meters.
And the Ways have several undocumented Tags. Needless is e.g. "Shape_Leng", "FolderPath", "Base". Only "cables", "power" and "voltage" seems to be right.
Also the power line shouldn't be splittet between every two nodes.

Thanks
pyram
ARATAA (2018-01-16 16:32:40+00:00): Hi, I work in South Kerman Power Distribution Co.(SKED), and  this data exported form GIS Software (Negin Power GIS)
Hjart (2018-01-12 10:09:09+00:00): service=Nørrebrogade ser ikke så heldigt ud
imagico (2018-01-14 12:21:27+00:00): Hello dikkeknodel,

nice mapping work on South Georgia - but you should probably be aware that there is no scrub vegetation around there - to my knowledge there are hardly any woody plants growing on South Georgia.  What you identify as scrubland on images is probably mostly tussock grass formations.

See 

http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/509458/1/The%20vascular%20flora%20of%20South%20Georgia%20-%20BAS%20Scientific%20Report%2045.pdf

for background info on the vegetation of South Georgia.
dikkeknodel (2018-01-15 13:08:47+00:00): Hi imagico
Thank you for the compliment and for the comment. 

I've selectively read the article and it explicitly mentions the northwestern area near Elsehul as extensively grown with tussock, additionally there should be some grass heath at higher altitudes where the soils is better drained. 

From this imagery it is hard if not impossible to judge what is heat and what tussock, so I will tag everything as natural=grassland.

Cheers,
dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-01-15 13:12:22+00:00): See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55461916
imagico (2018-01-15 13:20:11+00:00): Thanks.

If you can reliably identify differences in the vegetation from available images it does not hurt to differentiate them with supplemental tags (like grassland=*).
dikkeknodel (2018-01-15 13:21:18+00:00): Actually, natural=tundra may be better... It is less precise maybe, but since no accurate survey is possible without starting an expedition, it may be more applicable.
imagico (2018-01-15 13:41:03+00:00): natural=tundra does not say anything about the vegetation except for that it is without trees.  I would advise against it.  Grassland is completely fine here for areas with vegetation.
mbethke (2018-01-12 18:38:20+00:00): That's not the name of the place, is it?
abakus_uploader (2018-01-12 23:34:24+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897 - tam również proszę zadawać ewentualne pytania.
Pozdrawiamy!
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-12 08:54:34+00:00): Hi, you asked for a review, and this all looks good. Is there anything in particular that you're unsure about?
Rajsamand Local Guide (2018-01-12 09:12:55+00:00): Not now, if i have any confusion in map, i'll ask you.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-12 09:14:17+00:00): Just keep requesting a review, and people, incl me, will pick it up and look at it. 😁
abakus_uploader (2018-01-12 23:34:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897 - tam również proszę zadawać ewentualne pytania.
Pozdrawiamy!
mosstreet (2018-01-13 21:11:14+00:00): один мест один точк) это не рекламная площадка
bufferclip (2018-01-18 14:26:18+00:00): ich hab die Hausnummern jetzt auf zwei Punkte aufgeteilt. Also die Adresse vom Gebäude entfernt und 2 Punkte gemacht, die beiden jeweiligen Adressen enthalten. 


Hab hier gelesen dass man das so macht: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Adressen#Geb.C3.A4ude_mit_mehreren_Hausnummern


Hier mein Änderungssatz: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55551134
user_5359 (2018-01-12 19:12:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/180644335/history
StephaneP (2018-01-25 17:46:56+00:00): Bonjour R1mAr

Je suis un peu surpris, ces toilettes seraient remontées d'un étage, et seraient devenues gratuites ?
Normalement, elles sont dans la gare.
T1mAr (2018-01-25 19:15:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Les toilettes dans la gare existent toujours en effet mais il y a également un urinoir gratuit en exterieur au niveau de la gare routière.
StephaneP (2018-01-25 19:45:00+00:00): Ok, du coup j'ai annulé la modif, en dupliquant l'urinoir au préalable.
Digne (2018-01-12 13:15:05+00:00): Hallo Marc van S,

Ik zag dat er om feedback was gevraagd.

Ik heb niks op te merken. Het ziet er goed uit.
literan (2018-01-12 10:49:16+00:00): привет. Ты, кстати, не в курсе, что там строят? Щита нет...
ghost_07 (2018-01-12 11:24:09+00:00): Привет. Специально сегодня щит искал и тоже не нашел. На викимапии пишут про многофункциональное здание относящееся к детям. Думаю сюда могут Управление образования с Кирова перенести. Был пару лет назад в том здании по детским делам - там треш, полы проваливаются и все такое.
abakus_uploader (2018-01-12 23:34:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897 - tam również proszę zadawać ewentualne pytania.
Pozdrawiamy!
Digne (2018-01-12 13:15:39+00:00): Hetzelfde bij deze changeset. Niets op aan te merken.
mavl (2019-01-21 16:08:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
nevw (2018-01-12 11:16:08+00:00): This one too seems to be mostly tolerable but description is spam.
nevw (2018-01-12 11:04:01+00:00): Hi Sai
can you elaborate on why this has been deleted. It seems to have be tagged ok and website confirms the business site
http://skg.net.au/contact.html
Cascafico (2018-01-12 10:49:10+00:00): Benvento in OSM!
Puoi spostare il codice meccanografico nel tag "ref".
... e grazie per i contributi!
nevw (2018-01-12 11:12:58+00:00): Hi Sai
could you elaborate why this has been deleted.
The web site appears to confirm a physical location as mapped. https://www.lizzyannescleaning.net.au/
The description is however a bit spammy.
philippec (2020-04-14 19:53:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2159612#map=17/50.94305/4.58236&layers=N
wegspotter (2020-06-11 13:57:40+00:00): OK!
eggie (2018-01-12 12:06:22+00:00): Nr 23 is niet bekend bij het kadaster. U kunt hier een terugmelding maken.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=ijkenweg%2021&resultOffset=0&objectId=0098100000030490&geometry.x=202239.19640052&geometry.y=545849.4465982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0098100000030490
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-03 09:00:16+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=bistrot
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5334698164/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=bistro
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
dieterdreist (2025-05-04 07:54:27+00:00): thank you, I fixed it. I somehow used French spelling…
mapper999 (2018-01-18 20:06:35+00:00): Hallo Michel,
könntest du dir deine Änderungen bitte mal in keepright (https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=107&error=93394162) anschauen? Es gibt hier einige Überlappungen zwischen Wegen.
Viele Grüße
mapper999
DD1GJ (2018-01-12 19:09:45+00:00): Revert 55375423, Sportgelände ist kein Park im Sinne von OSM

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/

Hallo Pascal, lies Dir bitte die gestrigen Links genau durch und ändere "zweifelhafte Parks" entsprechend ab. Diesen Änderungssatz habe ich bereits zurückgesetzt.
pyram (2018-02-05 22:13:55+00:00): Hallo und Danke für den Versuch mitzuhelfen. Aber die Karlsbrücke heißt offiziell nur "Karlsbrücke" - ohne Zusatz. Ich habe das wieder korrigiert. In Nürnberg gibt es seit Jahren eine einhundertprozentige Erfassung der offiziell ausgeschilderten Straßennamen ( http://regio-osm.de/listofstreets/evaluation?title=N%C3%BCrnberg&country=Bundesrepublik%20Deutschland ).

Gruß
pyram
Roman Wilder (2018-02-06 17:51:41+00:00): Hallo,
für die Straßenbezeichnung mag die Aussage stimmen, nicht jedoch für die Bauwerke selbst. Diese sind eigenständig und haben auch unterschiedliche Namen: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karlsbr%C3%BCcke_%28N%C3%BCrnberg%29

Gruß, Roman
pyram (2018-02-07 16:49:31+00:00): Das mag sein, auch wenn Wikipedia lediglich Sekundärquelle ist und nichts beweist.
Du hattest aber die Straße und nicht das Bauwerk umbenannt, die laut Stadtlexikon (Primärquelle) aber dann "Untere" bzw. "Obere Karlsbrücke" wären und nicht "nördliche" und "südliche".

Ich kann das ändern, überlasse aber auch gerne die Lorbeeren dem Finder des Fehlers ;-)
Roman Wilder (2018-02-09 06:56:12+00:00): Die noch vorhandenen originalen Brückenakten reichen bis in das Jahr 1929 zurück. Durchgängig lautet die Bezeichnung Nördliche und Südliche Karlsbrücke. Oben und unten sind eher aufgrund der Bauhöhe entstandene umgangssprachliche Bezeichnungen. Ich habe beruflich Zugriff auf die Akten.
pyram (2018-02-09 13:40:59+00:00): Ob das jetzt eine räumliche Zuordnung ("nördliche") oder ein Namensbestandteil ("Nördliche") ist, darüber kann man philosophieren und ist mir im Grunde gleich.
Das zitierte Wikipedia wäre nach Deiner Aussage demnach falsch. Andernfalls ist ein Name ein Bestandteil der echten gelebten Wirklichkeit. In der Praxis dürften beide Varianten eher selten anzutreffen sein. Man könnte das mit official_name, old_name und/oder loc_name abbilden.
majkaz (2018-01-12 15:22:42+00:00): Ahoj,
můžeš prosím Tě na tuhle sadu ještě jednou kouknout? Jen na první pohled tam chybí kousíček v relaci žluté turistické trasy (ta pěšina v lese na Plav, zhruba v polovině, cesta 483476000). Taky předpokládám, že tahle pěšina, tak jak je nakreslená, by se měla potkat sama se sebou - a zase tam kousíček chybí.
Díky, Majka
Vladano White (2018-01-12 23:25:05+00:00): Ahoj,
no musím to ještě jednou zkouknout, dokresloval jsem pár cest a měnil pěšinu za lesní cestu, když jsem tam byl, tak mě to samotného překvapilo, že je to špatně zakreslené. Vláďa tam ale nasekal hromadu chyb a už jsem neměl čas to kontrolovat, tak jsem rychle opravil to nenutnější, aby mi to pustilo aspoň moje doplněné změny.. 
Díky
V.
Supaplex (2018-01-12 21:54:22+00:00): 建築物不在嗎？如果只是樓層數、名稱不對可以改動就好，不必整棟建築刪除
NatsuArashi (2018-01-13 04:46:22+00:00): 形狀不正確 應為連棟的大樓 而非兩棟獨棟
sergeybe (2018-01-20 14:43:16+00:00): По умолчанию высоты указываются в метрах. Пожалуйста не корёжте карту, если не понимаете как все устроена.
BCNorwich (2018-01-14 10:00:18+00:00): Hi I reverted the changeset that extended park into sea.
Regards Bernard
daganzdaanda (2018-01-16 19:57:33+00:00): Hallo difoltuser, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! 
Danke, dass du die Hausnummern eingetragen hast. Nur zur Sicherheit - hast du die vor Ort gesammelt?
Weil du den Bayernatlas erwähnst, den dürfen wir (OSM) nicht für Hausnummern oder Straßennamen hernehmen. Nur die Luftbilder dürfen wir abmalen, die bei iD und JOSM auch eingestellt werden können.
Servus, daganzdaanda
mueschel (2018-01-14 11:48:21+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here - you've added 7 multipolygon relations that don't have any valid tags, just imported tags which typically shouldn't appear in OSM.
And there are overlapping landuses, e.g. a forest overlapping with several scrub areas which can't be right.

Could you have a look and fix that?

Jan
StephaneP (2018-01-13 10:35:53+00:00): Coucou !
Pour les adresses, tu ajoutes le nom de la ville et son code postal, ce n'est pas utile.
Par contre, tu n'indiques pas le nom de la rue (addr:street=*), et ça c'est indispensable.

A+
marc__marc (2019-04-08 14:20:24+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552548778
qu'est-ce que c'est exactement ?
le labo de fabrication d'une entreprise ?
une association genre fablab hackerspace ?
Cordialement,
Marc
BrackoNe (2018-01-12 11:24:32+00:00): Dear saturiddo,

Thank you for adding all these great objects at OSM!

I would like to most kindly ask to use tools that makes 90 degree angles. If you click right click to polygon, you will get an option to make a 90 degree angles.

It will be more valuable if you use this tool!

Thank you in advance,
Nemanja
Myazyk (2018-01-31 14:04:30+00:00): Будівлі під номером 19 немає точно?