piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
portalaventura (2021-04-21 21:10:45+00:00): lapcito, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade .

Boa diversão com suas edições!
Lucas e Souza (2021-04-21 21:23:32+00:00): Amo lapcito!!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:13:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102170562, 102523966, 102524489, 102524671, 102524727, 102524903, 102525103, 102525150, 102525199, 102525280, 102525340, 102525379, 102525456, 102525514, 102525544, 102525775, 102525914, 102526046, 102526071, 102526156, 102526236, 102526266, 102526316, 102526370, 102526412, 102526452, 102526606, 102606736, 102607051, 102607390, 102607548.
Kevin van Krugten (2021-04-21 21:26:16+00:00): klopt! Dit pand heeft al sinds een langere tijd de voordeur van alle aderessen verplaatst naar de zuid-oosten van het pand en niet meer aan de buiten zijde zoals de meeste die voorbij komen zouden denken.
Ik zit zelf namelijk vrijwel iedere dag in dit pand.
Cascafico (2021-04-22 06:52:16+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM. Hai usato fonti attendibili? Sposto il numero da name a ref.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103364809
Gigigig (2021-04-22 10:27:50+00:00): Catasto regionale grotte FVG
Glassman (2021-04-21 23:31:13+00:00): #TIP: We like to leave address even if the building is torn down since the county is likely to reuse addresses.

Also, the crosswalk should extend from sidewalk to sidewalk. See https://www.snowandsnow.us/articles/Mapping-Sidewalks-iD/ for more info on mapping pedestrian ways. I fixed some of the issue.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103364869
Warin61 (2026-04-10 05:30:50+00:00): Hi,
Another relation with shared segments

see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=175.59368&lat=-40.36368&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
MxxCon (2021-04-22 03:15:13+00:00): Hello.
Please consider writing more descriptive comments in your changesets rather than just "vb". Please see this article that explains why it's a good idea to do it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103365014
scai (2021-04-27 09:32:12+00:00): Hallo Andy,

hier wurde ergänzt, dass die Fußgängerampel vibrieren kann. Wie lässt sich das denn vor Ort feststellen? Ich konnte keine derartige Funktion feststellen, aber vielleicht habe ich falsch geschaut?

Grüße
Alex
andybossert (2021-04-27 12:52:45+00:00): moin Alex,

ok, ich habe die Anweisung aus der App zu verstanden, ob an den Ampeln irgendwelche Signale gegeben werden und ich meine mich erinnern zu können, dass die Ampel bei "grün" einen Ton von sich gibt. Werde das heute nochmal überprüfen und anpassen. Danke für den Hinweis!

Grüße,
Andy
scai (2021-04-27 13:09:39+00:00): Der Ton lässt sich mittels traffic_signals:sound=yes angeben, das ist hier auch vorhanden. Zusätzlich aber auch traffic_signals:vibration=yes und das passt meines Wissens nach nicht, zumindest habe ich bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/961400923 nichts vibrierendes finden können.
MxxCon (2021-04-22 03:18:11+00:00): Hello.
When creating features that have right angels, you can right click on that feature and select "Square" or press Q button to quickly make right angels. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103365059
eggie (2021-04-22 06:48:12+00:00): In OSM Nederland maken we gebruik van de reeds aanwezige adresnodes. Daar dus op bijtaggen. Niet op de buildingshape zelf.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-22 06:51:53+00:00): De adresinfo en naam heb ik verwijderd van de gebouwomtrek.
eggie (2021-04-22 06:53:21+00:00): Dit is dus wel correct...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 21:42:32+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 101229895, 101230931, 102523335, 102523562, 102525376, 102525735, 102526185, 102526565, 102526945, 102527044, 102527579, 102528039, 102528921, 102532654, 102532772, 102532835, 102532976, 102675994, 102676171, 102680919, 102681004, 102682551, 102682622, 102682798, 102682935, 102683040, 102683187, 102683242, 102683338.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-21 21:54:18+00:00): 3 way update revert fails, all due to previous corrections.
eggie (2021-04-22 06:42:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback :  Editor iD suggereert dat je van alles en nog wat moet invullen op wegen, maar dat is niet nodig. De meeste accesstags zijn al default.
Alleen surface=paved is een nuttige aanvulling. De rest kan geen kwaad, maar is onnodig als aanvulling. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-23 07:13:14+00:00): Onnodige accesstags verwijderd
gr eggie
Hipari (2025-03-20 17:09:27+00:00): Update to new location
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-21 22:27:45+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102454326, 102454899, 102457848, 102458370, 102459560, 102459976, 102460596, 102461112, 102511974, 102512094, 102513660, 102513946, 102514208, 102514894, 102515199, 102515473, 102515760, 102517235, 102517494, 102517795, 102518312.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-21 22:55:15+00:00): 3 ways failed update revert; all seem to have been subsequent fixes
Patchanka (2021-04-22 18:34:01+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue 
Quelques infos ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Concernant votre modification, vous avez ajouté une adresse sur le bâtiment, en l’occurrence le numéro 8.
Or l'adresse existait déjà sous forme de point (donc inutile de l'ajouter sur le bâtiment) mais surtout il semblerait que l'adresse à cet endroit soit le numéro 2 et non 8.
Avez-vous vu un numéro 8 sur place ??
FabLabea (2021-04-27 09:29:01+00:00): Bonjour,

je débute sur OSM, excusez-moi. Il y a bien le numéro 8 sur la maison Piallotea. Je ne comprends pas pourquoi le 8 apparaît sur Optique Begi-Laguna. ça devrait être le 2 sur Begi-Laguna.
Patchanka (2021-04-27 10:49:40+00:00): bonjour
j'ai vu que vous aviez fait la correction, merci. Il n'y a que ceux qui ne font rien qui ne font pas d'erreurs !
Si le numéro 8 apparait encore sur le rendu, c'est juste qu'il faut attendre un peu le temps qu'il s'actualise.
bonne journée
menaa Edificius (2021-04-21 22:48:49+00:00): BIM
Nonexhudlix (2021-08-08 07:26:06+00:00): Könntest Du bitte davon absehen, Tags und Namen wild mehrfach an alle möglichen Objekte hinzukleben?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Ein_Objekt,_ein_OSM-Element

Bitte räum hier mal auf, dann kannst Du auch gleich https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2791566 schließen
eggie (2021-04-22 09:25:15+00:00): Een lastige...   leisure=school bestaat niet..
amenity=school natuurlijk wel, maar hoe heet die school dan?
Is het niet gewoon een sportlocatie?
leisure=sports_centre  ?
sport=...  
MVG
eggie
jgon6 (2021-04-21 23:38:55+00:00): Hi, 

Thanks for joining Open Street Map. I've looked though several of your edits, and The only thing I noticed was what you corrected with this edit. Because the sidewalk(and Auburn road for that matter) go over the highway, and do not interact with it they should not share any nodes, and a crossing node in not needed. 

I will also point out a common mistake so that you can avoid it. If you notice everything that is already mapped in an area is offset from the images it's probably actually the images that are off. You can adjust this as needed with the settings in the background options found on the right hand side of the editor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103367400
dafadllyn (2021-06-09 20:37:27+00:00): Hallo!

Wahrscheinlich sollten nur die Buchstaben "outer"-Elemente des Multipolygons zu sein. Oder gehört das rundherum auch zur Installation? So wie es jetzt gemappt ist (mit den Buchstaben als "inner"-Elemente) ist es sicher falsch, denn die Buchstaben gehören ja gerade dazu.
rthik007 (2021-04-22 05:48:16+00:00): Hi Jessie Harrison ,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with unclassified road .Kindly check with way 864586702.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103381092
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103367542
rthik007 (2021-04-22 03:28:07+00:00): Hi IsaacMcB98,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road .Kindly check with way 97524895.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103372522
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103367778
kevinchen1 (2021-04-21 23:57:47+00:00): add missing roads
Glassman (2021-04-24 02:17:56+00:00): #TIP: Boat ramps are usually done as a node at the end of a service road. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dslipway. Can you update?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103368514
archpdx (2021-04-22 15:27:20+00:00): Hi davmoochi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I appreciate your work in helping make OSM more accurate. I recommend adding a 'point' for the foundation you added on top of the appropriate building instead of renaming the entire building as there seems to be other organizations in this building, such as Transitional Youth and Luis Palau Evangelistic Association. If these points are outdated and these organizations no longer reside in this building, you can just delete these points by selecting them and pressing ctrl+backspace. Feel free to reply to my comment if you need any help with this. Happy mapping!

Best regards,
archpdx
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:25:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
AgusQui (2021-05-20 02:36:02+00:00): El nombre visible es YPF, Opessa Cabildo es el nombre de la sucursal y se puede poner como branch
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:47:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:39:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:24:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-08-19 23:39:31+00:00): ¿Por qué marcaste estos caminos como puentes? esta muy mal
user_2574941 (2023-08-20 20:19:18+00:00): You are a disrespectful and unkind person, who apparently does not know the definition of collaborative work.
I hope you don't find other people like you treating you the same way.
If you found an error, correct it without offending.
MxxCon (2021-04-22 03:47:39+00:00): Hello.
Please look at the Mapbox satellite imagery where you can clearly see soccer field here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103372706
MxxCon (2021-04-22 03:48:29+00:00): Please look at the Mapbox satellite imagery where you can clearly see 2 volleyball courts!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103372778
MxxCon (2021-04-22 03:59:26+00:00): Please note that you changing your name to troll mine and maliciously deleting legitimate features is considered vandalism.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism for a more detailed explanation.
If you have issues with my edits, rather than trolling and starting edit wars, you can simply reply in the changeset comments asking why such edits were made.
portalaventura (2021-04-22 03:39:14+00:00): rodrigopradopr, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
rthik007 (2021-04-23 05:02:15+00:00): Hi PhamNgocHoan ,
Fixed the alignment, as residential road passing over the rooftops  .Kindly check with WAY 332672969
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103446252
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103373299
AgusQui (2021-05-24 14:47:34+00:00): Buen aporte. Te corregí el etiquetado ya que al no ser teminal de pasajeros no corresponde amenity=bus_station
MxxCon (2021-04-22 04:34:58+00:00): Please note that your edit is based on Bing satellite imagery, which in this area is very outdated. This is a construction site for PS143 school. These basketball and handball courts no longer exist there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103375328
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:49:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:50:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
kartonage (2021-04-22 06:27:17+00:00): Hej and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

I have noticed that you have deleted a lot of objects in this changeset. These objects are visible and seem to be generally correctly tagged. 
It's not quite clear what you where trying to achieve here. You might want to do the iD-Editor-Tutorial first or have a look at https://learnosm.org/es/ first to see what you are doing. Either way feel free to try again without arbitrarily deleting existing objects.
Thank you

Hola y bienvenido a OpenStreetMap,

He notado que ha eliminado muchos objetos en este conjunto de cambios. Estos objetos son visibles y, en general, parecen estar etiquetados correctamente.
No está del todo claro qué estabas tratando de lograr aquí. Es posible que desee hacer el tutorial de iD-Editor-Tutorial primero o echar un vistazo primero a https://learnosm.org/es/ para ver lo que está haciendo. De cualquier manera, siéntase libre de volver a intentarlo sin eliminar arbitrariamente los objetos existentes.
Gracias
gendy54 (2022-01-15 12:56:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourquoi supprimer le tag principal disant que c'est une caserne de pompiers? 
Je le remets. Merci de faire attention à ce que vous faites. La communauté peut vous y aider.

Donat
gendy54 (2022-01-15 13:03:05+00:00): Ok je viens de comprendre qu'elle avait déménagée juste à côté. Comme les autres tags sont restés, ca m'a induit en erreur. De même que la BDTopo qui n'est pas à jour. Je vais faire les modifs. Merci ;)

Donat
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:47:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
maning (2021-12-30 00:31:38+00:00): This changeset resulted in a very bad routing result for Tambuli: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4243935/history

See details here: https://github.com/osmlab/appledata/issues/160#issuecomment-1002824389
FortBonifacio (2022-01-04 17:47:54+00:00): Hi maning, I see the narrow passage that you are referring to that you differentiated as a stepped footpath there on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1016736113. Thank you for reviewing and making that edit to improve the routing at this location.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:27:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Kha_nam (2021-04-24 05:52:41+00:00): Hi XylemPaoloGarrido
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping kindly with way 823718093
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103516281
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103381106
Kha_nam (2021-04-23 04:46:39+00:00): Hi Ben JO Valiente
Done partition and added a bridge tag as there is a canal kindly refer with way 899852880
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103448874
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103382021
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
user_5359 (2021-04-24 19:01:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! A fashion shop and mosque with a same id for internet_cafe? I revert your change set.

If you need help you are welcome!
K4nciasty (2021-04-22 06:42:42+00:00): Geoportal 2: Ewidencja budynków WMS
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-04-24 09:41:17+00:00): Hello Dhadz. You're adding a lot of shops and amenities. Did you visit all of them yourself or are you using information from another map or database?
MKnight (2021-04-24 20:50:08+00:00): Ich habe den CS rückgängig gemacht, da er meiner Einschätzung nach keinen Mehrwert bietet, sondern alles nur komplizierter macht.

Siehe auch: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72603
skyper (2021-04-28 15:34:51+00:00): Hallo soemisch
Ich finde es wichtig von Dir persönlich als auch von Mentz mehr Informationen zu diesem Thema zu bekommen und würde es begrüßen, wenn ihr dazu im Forum Stellung bezieht, anstatt einfach weiter zu mappen als ob war.

Dass ich diese überhaupt schreiben muss, zeigt doch schon ein Problem auf.

Grüße skyper
soemisch (2021-04-29 04:56:49+00:00): skyper, Ihr habt es doch schon gelöscht, weil Euch die Daten wahrscheinlich gehören. Da ist keine Diskussion nötig! soemisch
skyper (2021-04-29 16:57:03+00:00): Da hast Du OSM bisher nicht verstanden. Haben Dich Deine Vorgesetzten nicht aufgeklärt?

Finde Deine Reaktion merkwürdig bis bedenklich, aber vielleicht ändert sich das ja, wenn Du Dir die Situation noch einmal durch den Kopf gehen lässt.
Nakaner-repair (2021-04-24 15:15:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103541333 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by Forst Ettlingen. All deleted features do still exist. OSM maps what's on the ground, not how you would like to ground to be.
K4nciasty (2021-04-22 06:42:35+00:00): Geoportal 2: Ewidencja budynków WMS
Nakaner (2021-04-24 15:41:15+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe diesen und drei andere gleichartige Änderungssätze nach heute erfolgter Ortsbegehung wiederhergestellt, da es sich dabei um Vandalismus handelt. Die Wege existieren alle, sie sind schon seit Jahren – mache sogar seit über 10 Jahren – erfasst.

OpenStreetMap ist ein Projekt, das die Realität vor Ort abbildet. Nicht alles, was es da draußen gibt, gefällt jedem. Mancher würde am liebsten Nachbars Haus von der Erdoberfläche getilgt sehen, andere wünschen Mountainbiker:innen in die Hölle. Wir erfassen die Welt wie sie ist. Wenn ein Weg existiert, wird er erfasst. Alles andere widerspricht unserer On-the-Ground-Regel (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Dinge_so_kartieren.2C_wie_sie_in_der_Realit.C3.A4t_sind). Wenn ein Weg gesperrt ist, wird das Nutzungsverbot durch zusätzliche Attribute erfasst. Im vorliegenden Fall würde man die Wegbreiten erfassen, sodass Routingdienste dann unter Berücksichtigung der jeweiligen Landeswaldgesetze den Weg vom Routing ausschließen können.

OSM erfasst die Maßnahmen der Besucherlenkung, es ist aber nicht ein Mittel zur Besucherlenkung.

In diesem Änderungssatz hast du die Sieben Hügel gelöscht. Ist dir bewusst wie albern dein Handeln ist? Laut https://bnn.de/karlsruhe/karlsruhe-stadt/siebe-huegele-zwischen-ettlingen-und-rueppurr-sollten-den-feind-abhalten ist das schon seit Jahrzehnten ein wilder Spielplatz.

Falls du im Auftrag einer Behörde handelst, bitte ich dich, das in deinem Benutzerprofil anzugeben.

Viele Grüße

Michael
menaa Edificius (2021-04-22 06:50:17+00:00): ضؤؤض
Nakaner-repair (2021-04-24 15:15:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103541333 where the changeset comment is: Revert vandalism by Forst Ettlingen. All deleted features do still exist. OSM maps what's on the ground, not how you would like to ground to be.