piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GinaroZ (2021-11-26 17:36:20+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.
Perhaps the community centre tag might be suitable for the Village Hall here, and the others ones you've added?
osmviborg (2021-11-25 13:09:02+00:00): Hej. Adresse- punkterne, de er fredede. Vær venlig ikke at rette, flytte eller slette punkterne. Adresse- punkterne bliver vedligeholdt af en automatisk proces. Tak.
John Foldager (2021-11-25 13:49:31+00:00): Er det vej-segmenterne du mener? Skal jeg tage fat i kommunen for at få ændringer igennem?
osmviborg (2021-11-25 15:44:19+00:00): Nej, det er adressepunkterne. Du har slettet en og rettet en anden adresse, ved Maglehøjskolen. Begge vil blive reetableret automatisk.
SekeRob (2021-11-25 13:13:53+00:00): Hi, NoahTGL

Welcome to OSM, and surely you're aware that the purpose of the comment box is not 'hi', but rather to describe what changes/additions you made to the maps.... "added building, road, paths..."
Note the warnings (2). You mapped ways somewhere, but they are not connect at the crossing point. To router software that means no left/no right. Please check and connect.

cheers and happy mapping.

PS, please do map change saves on a local area basis, not that everyone between London, the West Bank 
 and Uganda gets to see these 'local' edits in their 'local' change history. This way only the people in the edited areas get to see and can review if they feel like it
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-11-25 13:17:17+00:00): User reported.
Take a look at: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006156672
marczoutendijk (2021-11-25 14:04:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5474

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Dave Venables (2021-11-25 16:25:08+00:00): I've deleted the unclassified road added in Manchester as it does not exist https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114224691 confirmed using aerial images and also from some knowledge of the area
Frans S (2021-11-25 13:08:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114222599
marczoutendijk (2021-11-25 13:50:11+00:00): Please use proper changeset comments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
mueschel (2021-11-27 14:58:47+00:00): Hallo,
hier sind an einigen Gebieten fremde Tags stehen geblieben, z.B.   KONSOLID = Y - bitte korrigieren.
msevilla00 (2021-11-25 13:18:41+00:00): Hi, I noticed that you do not use a proper changeset comment. Please follow wiki recommendations about that: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
marczoutendijk (2021-11-25 14:03:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5474


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Frans S (2021-11-25 16:07:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects
E: Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114222910
Frans S (2021-11-25 16:07:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects
E: Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114222915
user_5359 (2021-11-26 15:24:38+00:00): Hallo! Hier bitte nochmal den Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006159496 ansehen! Auch hier noch nicht korrigierte Fremdschlüssel.
351293 (2021-11-28 20:33:13+00:00): Hey, ich habe mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114336598 einiges rückgängig gemacht...
Auf der A66 gibt es keine Tempo 100 Begrenzung und auf der Abfahrt A3 von Ndh Ri A66 Wiesbaden weiß ich sicher, dass Tempo 80 ist. Hast Du Dir die anderen Abfahrten auch angesehen? Da hast Du ebenfalls Tempo 100 eingetragen. Ich meine, da wäre keine Begrenzung, aber ich war mir nicht mehr sicher und habe daher keine Änderung vorgenommen.
LG
Frans S (2021-11-25 16:05:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects
E: Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114223156
Frans S (2021-11-25 16:02:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Please connect paths/highways to eachother to complete a network.

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114223257
alessandrocarmeli (2022-08-30 13:23:42+00:00): Ciao, da dove esce "Via dello Scalo Legnami"? non esiste...
damjang (2022-08-30 14:10:44+00:00): Come scritto nella nota del changeset la via è scritta nel layer CIVICI REGIONALI COMUNI ASCOT di Eagle. Se ci sono civici con quella via la via deve esistere...
alessandrocarmeli (2022-08-30 18:37:38+00:00): Ok, ho controllato online ed esiste. Ho lasciato solo però l'asse principale togliendo le varie diramazioni con access
RicoElectrico (2021-11-26 22:18:30+00:00): Cześć, w tym zestawie zmian została całkowicie skasowana droga, co nie zgadza się z opisem edycji.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906996639/history
EKO-LAND (2021-11-27 00:35:00+00:00): Cześć
Dojazdy pożarowe nie są drogami po których można poruszać się pojazdami silnikowymi, dlatego nie można ich nazywać drogami pożarowymi. Ponadto usuwany obiekt nie jest wyznaczony jako dojazd pożarowy, dlatego też powinien zostać usunięty.
RicoElectrico (2021-11-27 00:41:44+00:00): No tak, ale nigdzie nie jest powiedziane, że jedyne drogi jakie wolno dodawać do OSM, to te przejezdne samochodem. Co z rowerami lub pieszymi? 
Dostęp się oznacza odpowiednimi tagami, w tym przypadku motor_vehicle=forestry. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle
RicoElectrico (2021-11-27 00:43:17+00:00): Sprawdziłem i zarówno GraphHopper jak i OSRM omijają takie drogi przy routingu samochodowym. A nazwa? No to można ją skasować bez kasowania drogi. Proponuję że wycofam tę edycję i dodasz jeszcze raz wg powyższego - w razie problemów pomogę.
EKO-LAND (2021-11-27 00:45:10+00:00): Użytkownik "kzmrzzg", który wprowadził błędnie opisane i zlokalizowane dojazdy pożarowe otrzymał w dniu 26.11.2021 r. prawidłowy zestaw lokalizacji i przebiegu właściwych Dojazdów pożarowych wraz z pismem wyjaśniającym.
RicoElectrico (2021-11-27 01:59:03+00:00): Zatem chcesz, żeby oryginalny autor to poprawił. Zgadza się?

Nie widzę komentarzy pod jego edycjami, więc pewnie poszło w prywatnej wiadomości. Wątpliwości do konkretnych edycji raczej powinno się dyskutować w komentarzach.
EKO-LAND (2021-11-27 14:13:59+00:00): W mojej opinii oryginalny autor powinien dokonać zmian i uzupełnień. Zwrócił się On oficjalnym pismem Do instytucji o udostępnienie informacji publicznej, i tę informację uzyskał. Jeżeli podjął się On zadania wprowadzania danych o Dojazdach pożarowych na OSM, to niech zrobi to rzetelnie. Mapy OSM stanowią obecnie jeden z głównych map bazowych innych opracowań specjalistycznych, i nie powinny zawierać danych mogących być przyczyną niewłaściwych interpretacji. Przepraszam za brak komentarza u oryginalnego autora, brak mi jeszcze obycia z zasadami społeczności OSM.
Cristoffs (2021-11-27 18:47:58+00:00): Najpierw by wypadało się zapoznać z zasadami społeczności .... a dopiero potem kasować. Tak przez grzeczność ... Co do innych opracowań specjalistycznych co masz na myśli?
EKO-LAND (2021-11-27 20:47:56+00:00): Opracowania specjalistyczne - no cóż, choćby opracowania branżowe.
Cristoffs (2021-11-27 22:17:51+00:00): tak ... a jakie branżowe? A tak na marginesie mimo, że konto masz od 2018 to trochę słabo, że pierwsza zmiana to wykasowanie czyjejś pracy .... jaka, by ona nie była.
EKO-LAND (2021-11-27 22:34:34+00:00): Jak chcesz mnie "wyprosić" to powiedz. Zamknę konto i po kłopocie.
Cristoffs (2021-11-27 22:46:24+00:00): Nie chcę Cię wyprosić. Po prostu jestem ciekawy, bo zainteresowała mnie argumentacja w rozmowie z Rico. W przypadku lasów (stare importy z BD Lasów Państwowych) w OSM mamy niezły bałagan i drogi pożarowe z nazwami to tylko wierzchołek góry lodowej. Więc ciągnę Cię za język dlaczego akurat ta droga jest taka ważna ;-) Nie bierz  tego tak bardzo do siebie. Zresztą zapraszam na naszego DS wejście przez stronę Stowarzyszenia (https://openstreetmap.org.pl/) będzie łatwiej rozmawiać, a kwestia "opracowań specjalistycznych" bardzo mnie zaciekawiła ;-) Ponieważ tworzymy bazę danych opracowań opartych na OSM oraz instytucji z nich korzystających, więc jak to mówią ciekawość zawodowa.
ivanbranco (2021-11-26 22:44:31+00:00): I don't think is right to add the town name in the neighborhood name like you did here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7234431062

name=Dalagsaan, Jamindan
since there's already
is_in:town=Jamindan

or to add informations "name=Sitio Maytaraw (occupied by Libacao)" to the name. The name should be the name and the name alone.

Also here you used an invalid tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9283194203 
PRIMARY SCHOOL=*

Can you take a look at them?
user_2066394 (2021-11-27 19:18:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114302529

Ich würde das abandoned:*=* drinlassen, als Signal
CaptainCrunch (2021-11-27 20:12:10+00:00): Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30835408 ?
Ich hab die Tags auf den inaktiven Teil https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006169684 verschoben, wobei mir gerade auffällt, dass dabei vermutlich der Teil nördlich der Umgehung auch dazu gehören würde. Vielleicht wäre das Beste, einen extra Way um den gesamten ehemaligen Bereich zu legen?
user_2066394 (2021-11-27 21:21:34+00:00): Guter Punkt, idealerweise das abandoned:*=* so flächendeckend wie möglich auf alle Bereiche, damit man eine Signalwirkung hat, siehe den aktuellen Mapper oben.
danieldegroot2 (2021-11-26 12:32:06+00:00): Hi, the edits you uploaded spread over a very large area. This makes them hard to track. Please upload you changes *before* you move to a new area. Apart from that they look great, keep up the mapping!

Regards,

Daniel
lyctkel (2022-06-15 20:34:20+00:00): Hi Ribly Assidiqi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/926572720 is tagged as building=schoo. Did you mean building=school?
Regards,
lyctkel
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-06-18 15:27:28+00:00): Hej,
access=yes på trapper er ikke korrekt. Det tillader cykler, hest, biler osv.
Frans S (2021-11-25 16:00:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114224185
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-11-26 23:24:59+00:00): hello, can you explain the source for the name change? it doesn't make sense the name you changed
Lee Carré (2021-11-26 14:11:14+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
olo81 (2021-12-29 23:19:38+00:00): coś jest nie tak, jeśli jest osobna ścieżka rowerowa to pewnie na ciągu pieszym nie ma bicycle=yes
spora część ścieżki leci na spadzie wału, też do poprawy. 
Niestety nie byłem tam. Chyba że gdzieś leży projekt to można by się tym zająć. Na razie bubel na bublu.
SekeRob (2021-11-25 16:42:36+00:00): Hi,
that none existing road pointed at eastward to a white line with just a name on it, same as the residential area. where I see in Carto standard that same name being rendered on the map i.e. what's the purpose?That would be flagged is Osmose as a tagless line.

cheers
eggie (2021-11-25 15:28:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Alle begin is moeilijk. Niet alle lijnen in OSM zijn wegen. Somige zijn de begrenzing van landuse of een wijkgrens. Daar beter geen wegen aan vastmaken of op laten eindigen.
Een trucje is om de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.  

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114224692

MVG,
Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-25 15:41:45+00:00): Het wandelpad heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse.
Veel plezier met mappen.
Gr eggie
dpolovinkin (2024-12-05 07:57:07+00:00): and it would be nice if you at least put those marks to their correct places at the beginning, so others won't need to move them around when sometimes its really off...
user_5359 (2021-11-26 14:50:14+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625183451! Did you mean name:ja instead of name:enja.

Please use also the correct character set.
pika_sky (2021-11-26 15:04:08+00:00): Hello. Thank you for mentioning my mistake. I've just corrected the mistake. name:enja was meant for name:ja, but I mistakenly entered the wrong one.
Cristoffs (2021-11-27 18:44:27+00:00): Proszę opisuj zmiany nie na podstawie ich źródła, a na podstawie zawartości
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114225477
ALu68 (2021-11-27 10:35:53+00:00): Hallo ItsKant,

Willkommen bei OSM und Danke, dass du die Karte mit verbessern möchtest.

Anmerkung zu den Namen: eine Bescheibung (Asphaltplatz, Bolzplatz) ist nicht der Name. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Die Eigenschaften "Asphaltplatz mit Basketball-Körben" ist mit den keys-tags bereits definiert:
    leisure 	pitch
    sport 	basketball
    hoops 	2
    surface 	asphalt
Für "TSV 1860 Friedberg" git es den operator-key: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:operator

Gruß & Happy mapping.
Frans S (2021-11-25 15:57:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or objects
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114225690
RicoElectrico (2021-11-26 22:50:20+00:00): Cześć, część informacji została utracona przy zmianie z punktu na obszar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5454170682/history
RicoElectrico (2021-11-26 22:50:32+00:00): Por. z  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006181368
Nordpfeil (2021-12-06 20:57:39+00:00): Hallo Shamillah!
you and others in the area are using the key=value combination
"wheelchair_access = wheelchair_access"
For the correct tagging please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wheelchair
I changed "wheelchair_access=*" to read "wheelchair=*" but you have to choose one of the following options:
wheelchair=yes
wheelchair=no
wheelchair=limited
wheelchair=designated
Please check and update.
user_5359 (2022-01-05 11:23:46+00:00): Hello Shamillah!
Can you please answer the question: What is the meaning of wheelchair=wheelchair_access? Could we change this to wheelchair=yes or is this more wheelchair=designated?
Duvodas (2021-11-25 22:37:09+00:00): Hallo,
mir ist aufgefallen, dass durch diesen Änderungssatz die Radroute Niederrheinroute (Süd) (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1467654) alle Mitglieder verloren hat. War das durch dir beabsichtigt? Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2021-11-26 06:12:04+00:00): Hallo,
natürlich nicht. Beim Hochladen hatte ich mehrere Relationskonflikte und bin eigentlich davon ausgegangen, dass ich den Konflikt richtig behoben habe - scheinbar wohl nicht.
Ich muss mich heute Abend erst mal einlesen, wie man Relationen zurücksetzt.
Viele Grüße
rempshaener (2021-11-26 07:07:20+00:00): Ich hoffe, es passt jetzt wieder: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114226256
rempshaener (2021-11-26 07:08:06+00:00): gemeint war https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114250037
Duvodas (2021-11-26 08:23:17+00:00): Ok, sieht gut aus! Kannst du die anderen Relationen in dem Changeset auch überprüfen? Diese Relation hat auch ihre Mitglieder verloren. Sie ist zwar nur kurz und lässt sich leicht manuell wiederherstellen, aber möglicherweise gibt es noch andere Relationen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13431941
rempshaener (2021-11-26 15:38:24+00:00): War noch eine weitere Relation betroffen, jetzt sollte es das aber gewesen sein - sorry.
Frans S (2021-11-25 15:55:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT Wiki tagging of highways.
Check this website please and tag the roads accordingly
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
Also try to connect highways to each other so that they form a network.
The tag path should be appropriate here.

How to measure the width of a road:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes and you get the width.



Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114226274
Shaun das Schaf (2022-01-29 11:57:34+00:00): Hallo Jehe,

bitte nutze den name-Tag wirklich nur für den offiziellen Namen eines Objekts.

Ein Parkplatz heißt z.B. "Goschehobel", nicht "B31-Parkplatz: GOSCHEHOBEL" oder "Parkplatz: GOSCHEHOBEL" oder "Parkplatz: Goschehobel". Gleiches gilt für die anderen Parkplätze an der B31 ebenfalls. Alles andere ist nur dazu da, um es auf der Standardkarte auf openstreetmap.org besser aussehen zu lassen.
"GESPERRTER Parkplatz" ist überhaupt kein Name und ist ebenfalls nur dazu da, um es in Textform auf der Karte anzeigen zu lassen. Dass der Parkplatz gesperrt ist, wird bereits durch andere Tags wie z.B. den access-Tag ersichtlich.

Ich habe das entsprechend korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Sanniu (2026-02-19 06:05:15+00:00): Hi, can you add also street names for addresses to make them searchable?
GEOIG (2021-11-25 15:15:01+00:00): Added name and brand based on official site https://www.toyota.fr/
Frans S (2021-11-25 15:43:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Tagging of highways
When a highway is rather wide, the tag path is not good
How to measure the width of a road
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes and you get the width.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114227051
Carto'Cité (2022-01-17 15:22:39+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette mise à jour.
Suite à la mise en service de l'accès sud de la gare de Chaville, sais-tu où se trouve les tourniquets pour valider les tickets ?  [Celui-ci](https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4229096815) est à l'extérieur de la gare, ça ne semble pas cohérent avec l'accès par l'ascenseur par exemple. Si tu as des photos je suis preneur :-)
Antoine de Carto'Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
Skiper (2022-01-18 18:07:40+00:00): Bonjour Antoine, 

Il s'agit pourtant bien de cela! :-)

L'accès à chacune des deux entrées de la gare est contrôlé par des portiques de dernière génération. L'un au niveau du kiosque de l'agent SNCF, place de Verdun, l'autre en haut des escaliers côté Gare routière. 

Les résidents du quartier désirant traverser par la gare doivent désormais demander un Pass spécifique gratuit, pour ne pas avoir à faire le tour. 

L'ascenseur se situe bien en zone contrôlée, entouré de parois, et n'est plus accessible sans accès valide. D'où mes modifications. 

Je pourrais rajouter les parois vitrées éventuellement. La toiture au dessus de l'escalier a également été entièrement refaite, mais n'est pas encore sur les images satellites, datées.