piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2020-06-04 06:46:04+00:00): Hallo okuw,

das Landesamt für Digitalisierung, Breitband und Vermessung hat uns die Nutzung des Bayernatlas (und praktisch aller anderen Angebote außer des 80cm- und 2m-Orthophotos) nicht erlaubt. Durch ihre Nutzung verletzt du die Vereinbarung für Mitwirkende, die du beim Anlegen deines OSM-Benutzerkontos abgeschlossen hast. Bitte benutze ausschließlich eigene Erhebungen vor Ort, Mapillary sowie die im iD-Editor und JOSM angebotenen Hintergrundlayer.

Es blieb mir daher keine andere Wahl, als diesen Änderungssatz rückgängig zu machen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86168595). Darauf aufbauende Änderungssätze habe ich ebenfalls revertiert.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Rainero (2020-06-04 10:20:33+00:00): Hallo Michael,
du warst schneller :)
Grüße,
Rainer
angys (2020-06-16 04:19:21+00:00): Please fix the relation, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/302382227
literan (2020-06-03 18:02:51+00:00): на стройплощадку по любым правилам проход запрещен. Ну или показывайте фото знаков/объявлений, это разрешающих. К тому же вы зачем-то теги Википедии с отрезка ЦКАД снесли.
4004 (2020-06-12 23:17:17+00:00): неправильно сгеокодировалось
eggie (2020-06-03 15:27:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.  De info heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode. website en office toegevoegd.
Svp alleen de adresnodes gebruiken. 
MVG,
Eggie
Malma (2022-01-21 19:43:50+00:00): Jag råkade se att hela skogen fått namnet "Lingonvägen 17", och tror inte det var riktigt meningen... Vill du kolla?
Nmxosm (2020-06-04 04:58:36+00:00): Hallo corrector_91,

vielen Dank für deine Änderungen. "Neugotischer Zierturm" hört sich für mich eher wie eine Beschreibung als nach einem Namen im OSM Sinn an (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name). Stimmt der Name trotzdem oder sollte er in die Beschreibung verschoben werden?

Vielen Dank und viele Grüße
Nmxosm
R0bst3r (2020-11-28 17:40:01+00:00): Hallo aszabo,
der Weg kann im Süden nicht laufen wie du ihn eingezeichnet hast. Hab ihn mal nach Luftbild korrigiert. 
Zudem hast du vergessen ihn als Weg überhaupt einzutragen.
Der nördliche Teil geht zudem wahrscheinlich durch Privatgelände. Kannst du das nochmals prüfen, Danke!
GoMap ist zwar für schnelle Eintragungen gut, man sollte aber später ggf. nochmals nachbessern.
Weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen!
R0bst3r
berndw (2020-06-05 19:12:47+00:00): Heißt die Bude wirklich Verlassener Kiosk?

Ich glaube wohl eher nicht ;-)

aber man kann anstelle von amenity=* ein disused:amenity=* setzen, den Namen kann man ebenso behandeln
Dann bleibt die Historie eines Objekts erhalten.
Ansonsten stell bitte Deine Hintergründe auf die Bilder von ESRI um, Bing ist in der Region sehr ungenau in der Lage.

Bernd
Nakaner-repair (2020-06-04 06:42:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86168595 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 86141834 due to usage of a data source without permission of the copyright holder (Bayernatlas). This revert includes all changesets which modified this tainted data.
Nakaner (2020-06-04 06:50:02+00:00): Hallo,

warum hast du die Baumreihen in diesem Änderungssatz gelöscht (die roten Linien in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=86141834)? Die Löschung ist rückgängig gemacht worden, aber interessieren tut es mich trotzdem.

Viele Grüße

Michael
4004 (2020-06-12 23:18:40+00:00): this is a car park - you can infer access would be private for vehicles
user_5359 (2020-06-04 13:23:35+00:00): Hello! Please do not insert non-existing lines, especially auxiliary lines for evaluations in OSM data. I have reverted your changes
Supaplex (2020-06-18 17:23:55+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
jtracey (2020-06-09 14:10:59+00:00): landuse=grass is intended for stretches of grass that are used as (decorative) grass, i.e., they're not intended to be used by people for anything. If there's any sports pitch, benches, etc. in it, then it should be mapped as a park or recreation_ground instead. Parks in OSM don't map the things we would typically call parks here, they map almost any semi-natural area (mowed lawns, decorative trees, etc.). Unlike other landcover tags, parks don't need to be a multipolygon to include most other landcover features, like pitches; they're expected to overlap. You can see more on the wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=grass
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
thampton (2020-06-09 15:58:59+00:00): This is very helpful thanks! Yes the University environment is tough because there's so much open space. As I work on campus I'll be sure to differentiate between park and landuse=grass
thampton (2020-06-09 20:29:15+00:00): I read the wikis. Very helpful. I think by their definition parts of many "parks" should have a different designation. The park polygons aren't supposed to denote the property boundary of the "park" itself. Take Clair Lake Park for instance. Only a part of it is usable playable grass. The Wiki Landuse=grass page says "There are often more appropriate tags for areas of grass." So for Clair Lake Park all grass should be park and any natural area should be converted to forest or grassland.
woodpeck (2020-12-06 16:54:35+00:00): In this changeset you have removed the name:uk tags from a street. Please be careful with that in the future; even if the predominant name should be Russian the alternative Ukrainian name must not be deleted.
portalaventura (2020-06-03 14:57:56+00:00): Corrigindo: roteamento do oeste para o noroeste.
Dardy (2020-11-21 18:25:13+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai inserito molti nomi relativi alla segnaletica cai sulle way. Di solito i nomi dei sentieri cai non vanno inseriti nel name delle way, ma piuttosto come relazione  (dai un'occhiata ad esempio per i sentieri 201 e 202 alle relazioni 11021128 per il sentiero 201 e 11031126 per il 202)
cartomatto (2020-11-23 18:04:31+00:00): Ciao.
Ok, ma in assenza di un nome e anche per evidenziare quali sono i sentieri "ufficiali" e legalmente riconosciuti dalla legge rispetto a quelli minori (alcuni talvolta quasi invisibili), mi sembra utile indicare il numero CAI anche come nome del sentiero (che poi è appunto la sua denominazione ufficiale legalmente riconosciuta). Poi se c'è anche la relazione, ben venga. ;)
Dardy (2020-11-23 18:20:59+00:00): Tendo a non metterlo mai ma in assenza totale di name posso capirlo.
Solo in questo caso però, è infatti completamente sbagliato nel momento in cui il sentiero ha un nome. Infatti un percorso cai può attraversare tratte con nomi propri (vie, sentieri ecc), l'associazione col percorso cai è solo logica.
cartomatto (2020-11-25 20:18:36+00:00): in realtà molto spesso i nomi sono puramente convenzionali, e magari diversi fra gruppi di utenti: biker, escursionisti, cacciatori possono dare nomi diversi.
Il numero (che sia CAI o catasto regionale) hanno invece un elemento di "legalità" ed ufficialità...
freeExec (2020-06-03 20:26:23+00:00): Почему вы поменяли brand:wikipedia на русскую страницу?
BusteR2712 (2020-06-04 05:48:34+00:00): Правильно указывать en?
freeExec (2020-06-04 06:38:27+00:00): Правильно указывать более полную статью. Первого взгляда достаточно, чтобы увидеть, что английская больше. К тому же сам бренд иностранный, и очевидно что у них статья должна быть более подробной.
BusteR2712 (2020-06-04 07:16:27+00:00): исправлю по всем своим правкам, другие обновления буду контролировать
BCNorwich (2020-06-03 16:15:55+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
From your changeset comment above and available imagery I assume the footpaths are on the ground. I also assume your deleting the footpaths was inadvertent. Thus I've reinstated the footpaths and added more.

Regards Bernard.
Nakaner (2020-06-04 06:48:31+00:00): Hallo kai_pedia,

leider baut dieser Änderungssatz auf Beiträgen auf, die unter Verwendung unerlaubter Quellen erfolgt sind. Der Rechteinhaber des Bayernatlas (um den geht es) hat uns keine Verwendung des Bayernatlas gestattet. Daher musste dieser Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht werden. Weitere Informationen hierzu findest du unter https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/86140899

Viele Grüße

Michael
tordans (2020-06-03 17:08:11+00:00): Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86142530
tordans (2020-06-03 17:26:28+00:00): Btw, I created an issue about the duplicate nodes; if you can provide details about this, please add it to https://github.com/bryceco/GoMap/issues/333 Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86142530
4004 (2020-06-12 23:22:45+00:00): not sure what existing data you mean, but I can't see how you got to mv=yes here
happy-camper (2020-06-16 17:32:10+00:00): Thank you for your comments.
Rwawn (2020-06-03 15:09:45+00:00): شارع احمد الصاوي طنطا
Rwawn (2020-06-03 15:10:04+00:00): Tanta Ahmed Al-Sawi
Adamant1 (2020-06-04 02:13:03+00:00): Hello. I'm wondering why you did a shoddy revert that added back the 527 empty nodes. Along with other things that shouldn't have been reverted. 

The proper thing to do if you disagreed with their removal would have been to leave a changset comment. As it is, you just added back objects that I 100% delete again without an extremely good reason as to why I shouldn't. Edit warring is never productive and hopefully we can avoid it.
edbort (2020-06-04 02:20:21+00:00): I'm fairly new to reverts and am not sure why all the empty nodes were added back. The attempt was to fix the sections of grass and the gardens that were removed. All of which follow OSM definition and should not have been removed. Any help you could provide would be appreciated. Thanks
Adamant1 (2020-06-04 02:33:53+00:00): That's part of the problem with reverts unfortunately. 

As far as the gardens grass, and paths, they were removed as part of a discussion that the objects were added as Pokemon Go gaming. Along with fake parks etc that were mapped around here by the same users. Which I fully agree with. Following OSM definitions don't really matter in that case and I'm not sure how it matters here anyway for various reasons. If you don't agree and think the objects should be kept fine, but if that's the case you should comment in the original discussion about it. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71127918

Personally, it's hard to say from the images if any of that should be there or not, but mapping those things in the way they are is consistent with Pokemon Go gaming and I doubt the paths exist on the ground as mapped. Plus, it really doesn't look there are gardens there. Although I'm willing to assume good faith. But you should still discuss it in the other changeset.
edbort (2020-06-04 02:51:45+00:00): Previous changesets that added the grass and gardens we're reviewed by SomeoneElse, a member of the DWG. You can find their comment on this changeset 73595085.
Adamant1 (2020-06-04 02:58:42+00:00): That works for the grass I guess. He didn't comment on the gardens or paths though. "Blueberry Garden" goes against the naming rule though. We aren't suppose to tag objects with descriptive names and the only reason it's done in cases like this is because Pokemon Go requires it.
edbort (2020-06-04 03:02:19+00:00): I was not aware that names of a garden weren't supposed to be included. Sorry
Adamant1 (2020-06-04 03:04:35+00:00): It's fine. It's an obscure rule. If you delete the empty nodes again and remove the descriptive name I'd be fine with that. I'm not really that concerned with the other stuff.
SomeoneElse (2020-06-06 11:44:19+00:00): Hi Adamant1,
Starting a discussion with "I'm wondering why you did a shoddy revert" isn't really ideal if you want to have a fruitful discussion...
This area's had more than enough to and fro editing over the years (see e.g. http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=716889895 ).  I thought we had reached a point before https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84301393 (by a completely different user, I know) where things that actually existed were mapped (albeit in more detail than is common for private gardens) and things that didn't weren't.
Best Regards,
Andy
Adamant1 (2020-06-06 11:56:45+00:00): True. I made clear the comment about it being shoddy was in reference to re-importing the 527 empty nodes with the revert though, which I think is an appropriate way to describe it, and had nothing to do with the other stuff that your referencing. The empty nodes don't exist and therefore shouldn't have been re-added. Which edbort agreed with. If he/she took offense to the tone he/she was free to say so and I would have done penance for it. But I'll still keep your comment about it in mind for next time. It was at least more polite the last the time you messaged me about my tone. I'll get there eventually ;)
4004 (2020-06-12 23:23:44+00:00): please DO NOT change specific access tags if you don't know the actual access values on the ground
4004 (2020-06-12 23:24:54+00:00): i would understand if there was no specific value set - but you can see a previous user has specified private for vehicles. It is generally unlikely this would change over the life of the barrier
happy-camper (2020-06-16 17:30:05+00:00): Thank you for the information.
Frans S (2020-06-13 17:53:49+00:00): Hello . Thanks for mapping on this project>
I am reviewing this task and I want to show you some issues
Your mappings are not that accurate as we want to achieve them. Oversized. multiple buildings mapped as 1, Not squared and nodes connect to other buildings. 
please pay also attention to the issue triangle on the right side menu and solve the issues before uploading them
See this link to see how you mapped
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S0D4WdPW3-BOqFpyN-00raoJJmbGOFiE/view?usp=sharing

This is the picture after modification
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S0D4WdPW3-BOqFpyN-00raoJJmbGOFiE/view?usp=sharing
Best regards

Please review this document
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
SomeoneElse (2024-01-23 02:00:12+00:00): I'm guessing that perhaps https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11167888/history shouldn't be "historic=ty", but what should it be?
Nakaner-repair (2020-06-25 12:37:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87140679 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user Przem3ek because at least a large part of them are vandalism.
eggie (2020-06-03 15:48:34+00:00): Dag RSL.. Lijkt me helemaal correct zo.

MVG,
Eggie
Nakaner-repair (2020-06-04 06:42:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86168595 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 86141834 due to usage of a data source without permission of the copyright holder (Bayernatlas). This revert includes all changesets which modified this tainted data.
redrace (2020-06-08 13:12:24+00:00): HUHU
Kannst Du mir mal sage, was Du hier gemacht hast?
redrace (2020-06-08 13:14:14+00:00): An der Stelle gibt es den Laden nicht den Du eingetragen hast nicht. Hier ist ein Brautmodengeschäft!
matt_ellery (2020-06-03 21:23:28+00:00): Hi,

Your changes to the A24 are a little odd. You've changed the maxpeed from 50 mph (which was accurate) to 80 (defaulting to KPH, which is not accurate). Also, the name of the road is not "Dorking Road_1". 

What program is "ATSR Edit Map"? If you are testing out a new editor then it would be better to use the dev APIs located at https://apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Cebderby (2020-06-04 09:51:53+00:00): See comment added at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86145036
user_5359 (2020-06-03 18:39:28+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the key SPATIALVER on way https://www.osm.org/way/812596359? 
Additional Hint: please use mix cased for name values.
user_5359 (2020-06-03 16:54:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. See https://www.osm.org/node/6447901257
pyrog (2020-06-20 06:43:52+00:00): Salut Benoit,

Les 2 POI du garage Peugeot à Fraisans peuvent être fusionnés.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2123048279
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2123048277

Il y a des tags pour indiquer réparation et vente (mais 2 façons de faire entre iD et JOSM. J'ai utilisé les 2)

Cordialement,
__
Yves

PS: bravo pour le périple en vélo :)
aceman444 (2022-02-16 00:07:24+00:00): Zial neopravili ste, tie budovy boli skoro dobre, podla katastra. Z jednej strany ste ich nechali podla zakladne, z juznej strany podla strechy, cize su teraz nespravne siroke.
Cebderby (2020-06-04 09:48:40+00:00): Having reviewed all your 22 edits over the last 3 years I note that:
- Not one of your edits contains any useful addition to the map, all are false fiddling with road names and speed limits, typically leaving the values wrong after 2 or 3 repeated changes.  This is vandalism.
- The false or damaged road names and modified speed limits have been left, and had to be corrected by others, leaving the map wrong eg for ~1 year in some cases.
- You have failed to respond to all of the changeset comments, in changesets 50406379 50406445 85560920 86130750 86144570
- The first of these comments, on the first edit from this account, identified to you that the 'editor' you are using is wrongly adding way tags to the changeset itself.  This you have neither acknowledged or rectified.

You will kindly cease making any changes with this 'editor', unless and until you make changesets with the correct tags, and have useful and positive content to add.
Any further changesets of this nature may be reverted without further warning.
skfd (2020-06-03 16:22:13+00:00): Привет! у landuse не надо ставить етажность. Етажность у домиков )
skfd (2020-06-03 16:22:54+00:00): В редакторе можно нажимать горячую клавижу Q что бы сделать выделеный домик прямоугольным )
Xtremator (2020-06-03 16:24:38+00:00): спасибо
Ooyabid (2020-06-08 06:34:55+00:00): Mohon di benarkan tata letak alamat saya
adiatmad (2020-06-09 06:26:07+00:00): Halo Ooyabid.

Kebetulan saya melihat diskusi ini dari
sini (http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussions-feed?c=Indonesia).

Akun RConnorsCarte19 mengedit nama jalan ngGatel dan Tanjung. Manakah yang Anda maksud?
Agar dia mudah memperbaikinya.

Salam
RConnorsCarte19 (2020-06-09 13:13:29+00:00): Mohon konfirmasikan alamat yang mana. Jalan Ngatel? Jalan Tanjung? Salam
aixbrick (2020-06-03 16:36:21+00:00): Quelle: nicht Mapillary sondern ALKIS
streckenkundler (2020-06-03 19:13:50+00:00): einfach alles auf no setzen und Haupttags löschen ist die schlechteste aller möglichen Varianten... du schreibst selbst in deinem Kommentar: Montag bis Freitag gesperrt... User Spanholz  hat das sogar präzisiert: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2212872#map=15/51.8571/14.0041&layers=N 

Warum erfasst du das nicht so...? CS wird revertet...

...wenn man nicht alles selbst macht :( 

knatschige Grüße...
mavl (2020-06-04 08:04:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту  [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
Вы добавили объекты, которые уже обозначены в OpenStreetMap, поэтому ваши изменения были частично отменены. Например, Марьино ущелье  и Мост влюблённых в Тюменской области уже были обозначены на карте.
user_5359 (2020-06-03 19:47:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Free gems 8 (2020-06-03 18:01:44+00:00): I understand what you are saying, but i think trunk link maybe more suitable for kwai chung road, as it is a fork between kwai chung road (route 5) to kwai chung road (一級道路)。
Free gems 8 (2020-06-03 18:04:23+00:00): take eastern corridor as an example. In route 4 exit 3C there is a road which is linking between oi shun road and the highway. And this road already changed as highway link. similar case of kwai chung road.
Free gems 8 (2020-06-03 18:06:08+00:00): also can you write chinese?
Kovoschiz (2020-06-05 07:29:45+00:00): For historic reasons, `highway=motorway` is special, so it has to be handled by `highway=motorway_link`. Oi Shun Rd ends at Tai Hong St, and this is a four-way intersection.
Free gems 8 (2020-06-05 07:53:23+00:00): but i will say kwai chung road is a spevial case. it is highway=motorway in kwai chung section, but in route 5 section it is highway=trunk. therefore we can describe it as highway=trunk_link(my suggestion) and highway=motorway_link(your suggestion).
Free gems 8 (2020-06-05 07:55:32+00:00): oi shun road was similar case but have difference here. oi shun road ends and the road linking to highway is called eastern corridor. but kwai chung road is same name with 2 totally different roads
alphensebezorger (2020-06-14 13:18:57+00:00): Hallo Martin,
Ik zie hier aan de Veenendaalstraat nog een handvol beschadigde BAG-panden. Staan die nog in de planning om te repareren? Elders in Tilburg zie ik nog losse huisnummers op de kaart, waar geen pand meer te vinden is. Nog een aardig to do-lijstje zeker?
Succes, Alphensebezorger.
Martin Borsje (2020-06-14 13:22:26+00:00): We zijn continu bezig (met onderbrekingen). A hell of a job....
alphensebezorger (2020-06-14 13:28:01+00:00): Ik kan me voorstellen dat je het af en toe wel even zat bent dan. Welverdiende pauze, tussendoor even wat anders. Sterkte met de rest...
muralito (2020-06-04 03:26:56+00:00): Hola. Gracias.

Las imagenes de bing son algo viejas y estan desalineadas.
Te conviene usar imagenes de Maxar que son de este año, o las de IDE.uy que son de exelente calidad del 2019.
eggie (2020-06-03 20:10:41+00:00): Dag b en j  Is er geen adresnode waar de info op kan?
Gr eggie
sovereign_ch (2020-06-04 09:38:38+00:00): Spätestens hier hättest du selber merken müssen, dass etwas nicht stimmt. Die gängigen Luftbilder (Bing, Esri, Maxar, Mapbox) dürfen grundsätzlich _nicht_ verwendet werden, ohne den Versatz anhand eines (besser mehrerer) GPX-Tracks zu korrigieren. Und in der Schweiz verwenden wir grundsätzlich die freigegebenen kantonalen Luftbilder, wenn verfügbar -- wie hier in GL. Entsprechend habe ich alle deine nachfolgenden betroffenen changesets revertiert.

Zudem lege ich dir dringend nahe, den 'Beginner's Guide'[1] sorgfältig durchzulesen. Ein Änderungskommentar und insbesondere eine Quellenangabe sollten eine Selbstverständlichkeit sein.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
MikeN (2020-06-03 20:14:06+00:00): Hi, great progress in Shelby!   Normally in OSM, land uses are not connected directly to roads because they do not extend to the centerline of the highway.  In some areas there may be a gap between the edge of land use and road in the default map rendering, but this is only because road widths are not drawn to scale in the current default map.
lostmike (2020-06-07 12:58:27+00:00): I'm curious about the additions and subsequent deletions here.  Did any of this actually exist?  Potential planning or just experimenting with the map?
eggie (2020-06-03 19:38:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Tip: Probeer als het even kan niet de paden met de landuse=forest te verbinden.

MVG,
Eggie