piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2019-06-18 18:33:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the both values, please?
freebeer (2019-08-12 02:41:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6438563532/history
weirdest atlanta i've ever seen, except for all the other spams.
i'm nuking it so you'll have to use other tools to see where it was.
skquinn (2019-12-26 23:41:53+00:00): Hi,

The tool used for this changeset seems to like to change "Jan 01" to "Jan 01:00" as well as "Dec 24" to "Dec 24:00" etc. This is resulting in syntax errors.
HubMiner (2019-12-27 15:46:02+00:00): Hi, you are right. I was not aware about this bug when I started using the tool, and injected some errors. Later on I started checking for that. There is a big submitted against Osmose, but no one is actively in it.

We could run Overpass query to catch this text pattern.
HubMiner (2020-01-21 06:51:14+00:00): Here is the Overpass query that seems to catch the problem.  It found a small number of global instances, including some false positives.  I'll start fixing the issue.

opening_hours~/(Jan|Feb|Mar|Apr|May|Jun|Jul|Aug|Sep|Oct|Dec) [0-9][0-9]:[0-9][0-9][ ]?[;,]/
HubMiner (2020-01-25 02:50:40+00:00): I fixed a few instances worldwide, I consider this done - let me know if you see anymore of these, or feel free to fix them yourself. :)
skquinn (2020-01-25 03:28:38+00:00): Thanks, will do.
korolenok (2019-06-20 12:34:24+00:00): Hi, zdmiller! I'm just interested in... For what purpose you made these lines? https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=697665324#map=18/37.03568/-80.79641
zdmiller (2019-06-24 01:25:31+00:00): Hey korolenok.
The lines were made to help create plats for the encompassed land parcels, as a type of advertisement.  Is using OSM for this purpose acceptable?  I was previously just downloading a local copy of the OSM data to my machine..
Cheers,
phidauex (2019-06-24 03:22:37+00:00): Hi, this is generally not allowed on OSM - parcel data changes too frequently to be a useful map input. The only things to include are features that are "on the ground", and they should be tagged using the tag rules for that item (such as roadways). Please remove the nodes and ways that define the parcels, and change the names of the roadways you changed to either the real name of the roadway, or blank. The "name" field is only for the proper name of feature. We are happy to have your help on the map, but please do not import other GIS data into the map without a clear plan with community support. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71313489
zdmiller (2019-06-24 12:32:28+00:00): OK.  thank you for the feedback and sorry for the trouble. I will revert my changes
phidauex (2019-06-25 01:35:00+00:00): No problem, thanks for working with us on this. If you'd like to make some other improvements, such as ensuring the nearby roads are named and aligned properly, and that nearby amenities like parks, schools and hospitals are correctly mapped, then it would probably benefit both your development and the overall map.
user_3022894 (2019-09-01 10:53:33+00:00): Hi thetornado76,
äh, ich glaube nicht, dass hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586121646 surface = sand ist ;) wäre ein bisschen rutschig die Partie. Hab's jetzt allerdings schon korrigiert. Viele Grüße, Lukas
thetornado76 (2019-09-03 11:54:35+00:00): OK vielen Dank für die Korrektur! Vermutlich falsche Taste damals gedrückt.
Gruß Daniel
user_3022894 (2019-09-03 15:03:27+00:00): Ja auch so, Grüße zurück.
ndm (2019-06-17 12:52:23+00:00): You've reclassified some major new cycling infrastructure as path - this probably needs to be reverted.
AlwynWellington (2019-06-17 18:07:06+00:00): @ndm , thank you for your observation.

My understanding includes these considerations:

* all my tags in Bristol are for ways accessible by the public without let or hindrance
* these ways are tagged for those on foot, such as River Avon Trail

If you can give me a list of my tags that are for ways provided exclusively for cycling I will be happy to do as you suggest.

It is my understanding the tag *path is neutral in its application.

When making changes I do my best to preserve pre-existing relations and routes, whether bus, cycling, walking, whatever.

kind regards
ndm (2019-06-17 19:37:48+00:00): Did you survey any of your changes - or are you making assumptions?
AlwynWellington (2019-06-18 08:34:21+00:00): ndn, thank you.

I could have asked you the same question, that you appear to have made assumptions.

If you would be so kind as to answer my question that followed my response to your initial query, then I think we can proceed on the basis we both have the best interest of all users at heart.

again, kind regards
AlwynWellington (2019-06-18 09:00:52+00:00): And, in addition, would you kindly indentify the location of the elements you believe should revert to cycle path.  Supported with documentation, if any, from the Bristol City Council showing these ways are to be exclusively used as cycle ways.

with kind regards
trigpoint (2019-06-18 12:35:11+00:00): Alwyn, a cycleway is not exclusively for cycling, foot access is allowed too.
ndm (2019-06-18 17:29:46+00:00): At least the Baldwin Street "path" is an exclusive cycle path, pavement is separate and marked (probably) as sidewalk on the road. A quick Google will help you there. As for your other changes in and around Bristol I'll have a look in due course and ensure that what's on the ground is what's mapped.
AlwynWellington (2019-06-18 21:50:11+00:00): @trigpoint, thank you.  I am aware of the various levels at wich OSM works.

To my mind the first level is what you see when using a browser.  My expectation an element displayed in blue is mainly or exclusively for bicycle access.

The difficulty arises when distinguishing between 'footway / footpath' and 'path' as those are both displayed in red.

Your reference to access is the second level, to my way of thinking and comes into play with apps (PC, Android, iOS etc) using OSM as the source.  The OSM browser page picks up on that with a 'Cycle Map' display.
AlwynWellington (2019-06-18 21:55:01+00:00): @ndm, thank you.  I will look at that directly.
I was also aware of the cycle and foot lanes physically marked on the Redcliffe Bascule Bridge.

I am still curious as to your interest in these matters.

kind regards
AlwynWellington (2019-07-02 03:15:25+00:00): @ndm, I looked at your issue a day or two later.
In looking at the detail I think I can see where I "went wrong".  To the east of Welsh Back, in what was quite a complex set of paths crossing one another and I had not noticed they related to physically separate ways.  I hope you have looked at this very small segment and are now content. 

A separate issue is to the east of Bristol Bridge and above Floating Harbour.  The way here appears from the signage to be a shared path.  And the available imagery shows many on foot and none on a bicycle, although a small number are parked, including several for hire.
Accordingly this way is more appropriately marked, in accordance with the wiki, as "=path".  I would appreciate your observations.
AlwynWellington (2019-07-02 03:20:37+00:00): Of course, marking as a path does not in anyway affect any cycling route relationships.  These will still be displayed in the "Cycle Map" layer and in "cycling.WayMarkedTrails.org": these are 'fed' from the OpenStreetMap database and can be as up to date as posts made within the last few minutes before an enquiry.
ndm (2019-07-02 23:11:34+00:00): I note one of your recent changes has been completely reverted (not by me!).

It would be better to explain your ideas/motivations on talk-gb mailing list -- then you will get a general range of opinions. E.g. using the duck test, etc.
AlwynWellington (2019-07-03 04:57:14+00:00): @ndm, thanks, a good suggestion

Does "duck test" in this context mean "if it quacks like a duck ..."?
Or does it mean something else? 

regards
AlwynWellington (2019-07-10 22:39:52+00:00): @ndm.
A few days ago I have looked at the talk-GB mailing list for the first several days of  July 2019.

A phrase I saw, and took to heart, is to map what is physically there.

I will continue to look from time to time.

Kind regards
I will
user_2066394 (2022-09-07 15:41:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6552062008

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3349475#map=19/47.81342/12.42547

War das was Temporäres?
moloko67 (2022-09-08 07:31:34+00:00): da hatten die Bewohner des Hauses südlich mal für Radfahrer und Wanderer eine kleine Imbissausgabe gebaut, als ich vor ca. 3 Monaten das letzte Mal vorbeikam existierte er allerdings nicht mehr
user_2066394 (2022-09-08 08:36:06+00:00): Einwandfrei, habe es vorerst mal auf disused:*=* gesetzt und den Fehlerhinweis geschlossen.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:11:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:11:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:11:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:11:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
viloan (2019-06-17 04:05:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-17 19:24:06+00:00): #failed
Владимир К (2019-11-04 11:50:55+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за ваш вклад.
Вы делаете много ошибок - пересечения пешеходных и проезжих дорог должны иметь общую точку
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 15:26:46+00:00): Hello,
It looks like the change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/592351680/history has the same problem previously discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71209109 .  Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?
Best Regards,
Andy
galyanh (2019-09-10 07:44:47+00:00): Hi Andy,
Thanks for looking into this. As suggested by the community, we ran the overpass query and modified the motor_vehicle=yes tag to unspecified. Let me know in case you have any further suggestions for us
Apologies for a delayed response.
(Posting on the behalf of spavulur)
Best Regards
galyanh
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71315331
SomeoneElse (2019-09-29 18:31:25+00:00): (sorry for the belated reply) thanks for sorting this out.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
viloan (2019-06-17 04:49:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-09 19:27:26+00:00): FYI, you can connect golf cartpath area to each other using tunnels under the main roadways.
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-17 19:24:44+00:00): #failed
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-06-17 05:50:40+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
Baloo Uriza (2019-06-17 12:03:51+00:00): These aren't two lane roads, they're unlaned residential streets.  lanes=* is inappropriate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71316612
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
SomeoneElse (2019-06-17 09:16:05+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
OSM is a map of the world as it exists.  Please don't write words in "footpaths" on it.
Best Regards,
Andy
Linkid (2019-06-17 13:49:29+00:00): Bonjour,
Serait-il possible d'avoir le détail des modifications, s'il vous plaît ?
Merci
aleksaJov (2019-09-10 07:31:24+00:00): Hello Conor Dunne,

Can You confirm this is a roundabout because they have also oneway=yes tag in way property?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94675353

I found this hint at Osmose issues list: "4020 on junction=roundabout: Unneeded tag on junction=roundabout".

Regards,
Aleksandar
BubbaJuice (2022-10-15 04:54:24+00:00): This was actually named "Unknown Tank" - check the USGS Topo Maps.
eggie (2019-06-17 07:57:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
আফতাবুজ্জামান (2019-08-14 21:55:17+00:00): Fakrul Alam Akkas কি? সড়কের নাম? 

আর কষ্ট করে বাংলাদেশের কোন কিছুর নাম OSM-এর নিয়ম অনুসারে বাংলা অক্ষরে দিন। অন্য ভাষায় নাম তার স্ব কোডে দিন। 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Multilingual_names&oldid=1855701#Bangladesh দেখুন।
user_5359 (2019-06-18 18:31:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert you change set because you aren't a church!
archie (2019-06-17 06:52:36+00:00): Fel ändringsset-kommentar. Skall rätteligenlyda: landuse=grass isf natural=grassland. Även Vårgårda kommun har upptäckt att det av bl a hygieniska skäl är av fördel att hålla gräshöjden lågt i tätbebyggelsen.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 16:12:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
noelbov (2019-06-17 20:51:00+00:00): Beste Koen,
Het stukje Margrietendreef dat u hebt aangebracht sluit niet aan op de bestaande Margrietendreef. De update van de fietsroute 81-82 is daardoor onderbroken. Op knooppunt 81 in de Weerterdreef is trouwens de pijl naar knooppunt 82 afgeplakt, vermoedelijk omdat de werken aan de houten brug over de Naamsesteenweg nog niet helemaal afgerond zijn. Het stukje Margrietendreef zou op deze brug moeten aansluiten en de afrit van deze brug aan de overkant van de Naamsesteenweg zou moeten aansluiten naar de Diewegstraat. Of misschien hebt u een andere en betere bron dan ik.
Vriendelijke groet.
N.
Koen VO (2019-06-18 05:26:58+00:00): Hallo. De weg en brug zijn open ondertussen. Ben er al paar keer over geweest. De oude margrietendreef sluit effectief niet meer aan. Er zal ter plaatse moeten gekeken worden hoe de fietsroute aangeduid staat. Groeten. Koen
szydzio (2019-06-18 07:38:30+00:00): Schemat waterway=riverbank jest również poprawny, nie ma powodu do zmiany schematu tagowania na natural=water. Na Wiki jest nawet taka wyraźna wskazówka 
w sekcji „How to map” fragment „Do not” =>
 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank#How_to_map
kirma (2019-06-17 07:28:45+00:00): Laitoin...
Stefan Nagy (2021-08-05 18:34:28+00:00): Hallo,

die military=danger_area "Brunner-Stern" (node 2433743908) wird vom OsmAnd-Renderer groß und fett in Rot dargestellt – bei einer Zoom-Stufe, bei der ich im Hochformat auf meinem alten Smartphone auch  den Neusiedler See sehe…

War die Quelle dafür, dass das eine militärische Sperrzone ist lokal knowledge oder der NÖ Atlas? Ich kann dazu auf die Schnelle nichts finden.

Danke & lG, Stefan.
Stefan Nagy (2021-08-05 18:54:11+00:00): Nur weil ich über die OSM Talk AT Mailingliste mitbekommen hab, dass dieser User Account von mehreren Leuten genutzt wird und nur aus Interesse: Wie macht ihr das in so einem Fall? Wie vollzieht ihr z.B. im konkreten Fall nach, wer vor zwei Jahren die Einfahrt dieses Sägewerks als militärische Sperrzone getagged hat?

Es macht ja im Grunde wenig Sinn, wenn ich hier nach der Quelle frage, wenn ihr überhaupt nicht wisst, wer das überhaupt eingetragen hat… :/
Stefan Nagy (2021-08-30 20:27:50+00:00): User franse hat dieses Problem behoben, weil er oder sie auch über OsmAnd darauf gestoßen ist (siehe Changeset 109717523). Habt ihr mittlerweile herausgefunden, wer dafür verantwortlich war?
mavl (2019-06-19 16:52:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71409389 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
mavl (2019-06-19 16:52:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71409389 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
FvGordon (2019-10-14 22:14:37+00:00): Is way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554279867 oneway or not? Same question to way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554279871
Okavango77 (2019-10-15 18:24:38+00:00): I didn’t add the “oneway=yes; no” tag, but as far as I can tell from Bing imagery the road is not oneway so you can remove the tags.
ma-rt-in (2019-06-17 10:09:34+00:00): Hallo und Willkommen bei OSM,
die ersten Änderungen sehen ja schon mal gut aus. Aber ich bitte doch drum, in das Kommentarfeld etwas mehr zu schreiben wie "test".
Am besten solltest du auch hier schauen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap

vg
mavl (2019-06-19 16:52:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71409389 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
freebeer (2019-06-19 19:18:11+00:00): this looks like it needs manual correction after a string of maps.me edits.

it appears on the international map still as prospect (cyrillic) but both the name:en and :ru show panda, which i presume is correct.
archie (2019-06-17 09:04:41+00:00): Ang. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696408326. + + + Du kan inte byta path mot cycleway när det gäller tag-kombinationen foot=designated + bicycle=designated + highway=path. Det är en fast tagset kombination. Läs hjälpsidorna först innan du byter tag: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_universal_tag
beza208 (2019-06-17 08:28:49+00:00): Done
beza208 (2019-06-17 08:29:35+00:00): Done
maraf24 (2019-06-17 11:11:59+00:00): Duplikat adresu i nieprawidłowe oznaczenie budynku.
eggie (2019-06-17 08:43:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-06-17 08:53:12+00:00): Graag voorzichtig met fietsroutes. Het is specialistenwerk en kan niet worden aangepast met een simpele editor als iD.
Met editor JOSM en een flinke dosis ervaring kan het wel.
....
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       
MVG,
Eggie
Sosha1996 (2019-06-27 19:30:11+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «New Updates» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ajf3934221 (2019-06-17 09:41:57+00:00): Alles klar, vielen Dank!

Unklar ist mir jedoch wieso emergency_ward_entrance / rescue_service besser innerhalb der Halle aufgehoben ist statt am Tor zur Halle. 

Wäre es nicht logischer, den Punkt als Navigations-Zielpunkt für die Rettungskräfte am Übergang von Straße zum Gebäude zu setzen?

Ausserdem ist mir nicht klar warum die Zufahrt für die Rettungskräfte kein service=driveway ist, denn eigentlich würde das doch für eine Grundstückszufahrt passen oder nicht?

Grüße, 
Andy
ma-rt-in (2019-06-17 09:46:45+00:00): Hallo,
das emergency_ward_entrance zeigt den Eingang zur Notaufnahme für den Rettungsdienst. Es wäre mMn falsch es an der Zufahrt zu setzten.
Zum service: service=driveway ist sehr schwammig formuliert und meist schwer zu setzten, deshalb mMn nutze ich nur parking_alias und emergency_access. Des Weiteren ist es ja keine GrundstücksZUfahrt sondern nur ein Weg.
vg
ajf3934221 (2019-06-17 14:35:38+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung!
Grüße
Andy
Wulf4096 (2019-06-17 09:05:50+00:00): Hallo!
Ist das eine Duplette?
https://osm.org/node/6496491972 existiert bereits.

Davon ab: Wenn du eine neue Ladestation findest, bitte noch paar mehr Informationen ranbauen. Gerne auch aussagekräftige Fotos :-)
beza208 (2019-06-17 09:00:12+00:00): Validation
beza208 (2019-06-17 09:00:22+00:00): Done
mavl (2019-06-19 16:52:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71409389 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].