piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iwhs (2017-09-05 14:07:03+00:00): Hi chessrat - do think that Undercliff Drive is open to cyclists now... Will cycle down and check, unless you get there first...
Pikse (2024-09-26 12:51:51+00:00): The following road segments that you created here are not named "Saatse Boot". This name stands for a boot-shaped area that the road passes not the road itself.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520009569/history/1
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520009577/history/1

Also there is no such thing as northern Saatse Boot. Northern one of these road segments instead passes so-called Lutepää Triangle.
kreuzschnabel (2017-09-17 09:04:32+00:00): Diese Änderung hat https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253222790 zu einer Einbahnstraße in westlicher Richtung gemacht. Das kann nicht stimmen, oder? Jetzt kann nämlich niemand vom Kurt-Schumacher-Ring (von der Unterführung kommend) nach Osten auf den Evreuxring weiterfahren.
kreuzschnabel (2017-09-17 15:20:56+00:00): Erledigt, oneway nach Befahrung weggenommen.
letihu (2017-09-06 19:13:01+00:00): Hallo Svesel,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap.
Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520011737/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520012909/history
hast Du vergessen einen tag zu setzen.
Die Linien sind auch doppelt (übereinander) gezeichnet.
scratera (2017-08-30 18:08:26+00:00): solo una domanda banale ma perchè creare un nuovo punto quando il ristorante già esisteva???...eliminane uno per piacere
inbitcoin (2017-08-30 18:50:49+00:00): Hai ragione, chiedo scusa, una svista.
É già stato rimosso mi sembra.
Grazie.
letihu (2017-09-06 19:17:26+00:00): Hallo Svesel,
den Gebäudetag hast Du sehr gut an den Gebäuden getaggt.
Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5069373698/history
und hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5069373697/history
dürfen sie natürlich nicht noch zusätzlich sein.
eggie (2017-09-10 19:41:01+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
user_5359 (2017-08-30 17:59:20+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM!. Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Punkte / Wege, die nur einen Namen besitzen, sind sinnlos. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a . 

Allerdings gibt es die Landebahn bereits in den OSM Daten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147175482#map=14/50.8678/7.1474&layers=ND und da der Inhalt von name eher eine Beschreibung statt eines Namens lösche ich Deinen Eintrag komplett.
R0bst3r (2017-08-31 05:44:02+00:00): Danke!
muralito (2017-09-07 17:59:04+00:00): ¿Que quisiste mapear aca?
JuMaps (2017-09-07 20:53:22+00:00): Lamento los errores. Son puntos que intento grabar en Mis Lugares, pero como no estoy tan familiarizado se comparten. Pueden eliminarse
muralito (2017-09-07 22:22:32+00:00): Gracias por tus respuestas. Ya elimine los que me hiiciste devolucion.
JuMaps (2017-09-07 22:53:32+00:00): Gracias a vos por tu gentileza, cordial saludo
Alecs01 (2017-08-30 19:13:23+00:00): Grazie e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! Puoi aggiungere anche il nome se lo conosci
Christophe Mathieu (2018-01-13 09:32:42+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/51582923
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-12 14:04:05+00:00): Do you know what is the purpose of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223853253/history ? Is it a parking?
Autharite (2018-01-14 12:52:10+00:00): Hello. This area is covered with gravel. It is freely accessible from the street, sometimes there are cars parked there, but there is nothing that formally designates it as a parking lot (no road sign, no marking on the ground).
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-14 14:03:31+00:00): In my town I tag such places as amenity=parking - I feel that it fits "a facility used by the public, customers, or other authorised users for parking motor vehicles" ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking ).

(if you are curious why I commented here - there was huge and a bit pointless discussion on tagging mailing list about this object starting with https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-January/034727.html )
chillly (2017-09-07 18:37:53+00:00): Please add comments to your edits so other people know what your edit is about
aixbrick (2017-12-09 11:27:47+00:00): Hallo,
bitte prüfe das Wohnhotel mal. Das ist gleich 3x vorhanden (2x als Node, 1x als Gebäude). Wenn das gesamte Gebäude Wohnhotel ist, sollte man nur die Daten auf dem Gebäude belassen. Den einen Node kann man dann löschen, den anderen auf "entrance=yes" (Adresse unnötig) setzen.
Gruß
Peer van Daalen (2017-12-16 10:22:37+00:00): Ja! Das gesamte Gebäude ist das Wohnhotel der Alexianer.
-
http://www.alexianer-aachen.de/unsere_angebote/besondere_angebote/wohnhotel/
-
Da hab ich es wohl ein bißchen übertrieben ...
Peer van Daalen (2017-12-16 10:26:45+00:00): Jetzt besser?
aixbrick (2017-12-16 10:53:16+00:00): Ja :-)
aixbrick (2017-12-16 10:55:56+00:00): Evtl. lässt man den Note am Eingang noch weg, weil das bereits im Description-Tag am Gebäude steht.
Peer van Daalen (2017-12-16 16:04:13+00:00): Jetzt fällt es mir wieder ein! Ich dachte, wenn ich das alles mache, so wie zuvor, - dann muß diese Einrichtung ja irgendwann mal sichtbar werden in der Kachel. Aber nee, nix da ... ! Dann eben nicht! :-)
dónal (2017-08-30 15:42:35+00:00): I accidentally added a bunch of ways by accident in this change. Cleaned up in changeset # 51584210.
Constable (2017-08-30 17:47:40+00:00): Ciao, perché hai aggiunto qusto tratto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520036798 ?
non mi risulta esista nessun punte in quel punto
Constable (2017-08-30 17:47:46+00:00): *ponte
SK53 (2017-08-30 17:37:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

One point: I'm not at all sure that Civil Aviation Authority documents (or those of Eurocontrol) are a permissible source for OSM data. They either need to have an suitable open licence or we need a letter saying that we can use the information to add stuff to OSM. A further complication is that stuff may be based on OSGB mapping too.

Could you please clarify the licence for this documents (it's not shown on the PDF).

Sorry for being awkward on your first edit, but keeping OSM data clear of potential copyright issues is something we need to keep an eye on.
Basstoelpel (2017-08-31 05:44:41+00:00): Wie kommst Du darauf, daß die Racheldiensthütte mit dem Wirtshaus zum Wichtl identisch wäre?
B_BB (2017-09-05 18:21:46+00:00): Mein Fehler, auf der Speisekarte stand diese URL. Jedoch stimmt die Öffnungszeits-Korrektur.
Constable (2017-08-30 17:50:53+00:00): Ciao, guarda che le cascine non vanno mappate come hai fatto tu. Leggendo la mappa per come le hai inserite tu risultano soltanto due edifici a pianta rettangolare con i muri esterni lunghi qualche decina di metri, quando in realtà all'interno di quell'area gli edifici sono piccoli e più di uno.
Tanto per non andare troppo lontano, questa è una cascina ben mappata, prendi pure spunto da li
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182921938
Se hai dubbi chiedi pure, grazie
Constable (2017-10-01 14:36:54+00:00): la mia osservazione è ancora valida, correggi per favore!
TagaSanPedroAko (2018-04-16 02:10:22+00:00): [Pasay, Quezon City, and Makati] add POIs
mueschel (2017-09-01 09:27:02+00:00): Hi,
I saw the tags "line1" and "line2" on several of bus stops in this area. These tags are not used in other places. The key "route_ref" is used quite often for the purpose of noting the bus services stopping at a node. You can add several numbers / names in a list, separated by ';'. Could you adapt this to the more common tagging scheme? Actually, this tag is  not necessary if the bus routes are tagged using a relation.

Cheers, Jan
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-08-31 09:38:14+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto in OSM. Cosa volevi rappresentare con quell'area? Se si disegnano punti percorsi o aree occorre dare loro almeno un tag (descrittore) altrimenti il sistema non ha idea di cosa tu voglia rappresentare.
muziriana (2017-09-18 12:15:56+00:00): Hi, Thanks for adding  buildings.But individual buildings should be separate or they can be tagged as landuse or something, can you please have a look at those multiple buildings tagged as one?
mgpx (2017-09-01 21:22:08+00:00): Egész biztosan alpine_hut itt a megfelelő jelölés? Ez a címke olyan menedékházaknál alkalmazandó, amelyek szállás- és étkezési lehetőséget biztosítanak, és állandó személyzettel rendelkeznek (ld leírását a Wikin)
Mike Baggaley (2017-08-31 13:06:52+00:00): Hi, on footway 520047037, access=private and foot=yes are both set, leading to confusion about whether you intended the pedestrian access to be private (in which case it would be better to remove foot=yes) or not (in which case it would be better to remove access=private). Also, adjoining way 520045047 looks like it should probably be tagged as parking rather than nature_reserve (it is a small rectangle with a highway tagged as a parking aisle leading to it). Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
andreas5232 (2017-08-30 22:45:09+00:00): Danke für's fixen, bin noch neu hier bei OSM.
ToniE (2017-08-31 07:40:16+00:00): Hallo Andreas und willkommen bei OSM.

An Deinen ersten 22 Edits sehe ich, dass Du wohl in WOL, Geretsried oder so aktiv bist - wohnst?

Wenn ja, und Du zufällig dran vorbei kommst, darf ich Dich auf zwei NOTES von mir "ansetzen", bei denen es um Einbahnstraßenrichtung geht?
Die Fragen haben massiven Einfluss auf eine Reihe (>20) von ÖPNV-Relationen(Linien) in OSM.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1024618

und

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1024622

Wie gesagt: falls Du eh grad in der Nähe sein solltest ... Danke.

Ansonsten: happy mapping und have fun.

Gruß
Toni
andreas5232 (2017-08-31 18:49:21+00:00): Servus Toni,
ich habe dort vor meinem Studium lange  gelebt und bin aktuell mal wieder ein paar Tage in der Gegend. Deine Notes habe ich mir angesehen und verifiziere meine Aussagen in den nächsten Tagen nochmal vor Ort.
Falls Du noch weitere Problemstellen hast, kann ich gerne versuchen zu helfen, schließlich lebt das Projekt davon, dass sich Menschen einbringen.

Grüße aus Wolfratshausen,
Andreas
ToniE (2017-08-31 19:07:04+00:00): Danke Andreas,

die beiden Notes brannte mir schon ein wenig unter den Nägeln.
Ich bin seit Februar verstärtk (vorher auch schon) bzgl. ÖPNV in OSM aktiv und habe ein Script zur Qualitätssicherung von ÖPNV-Relationen in OSM geschrieben.
Für den MVV kannst Du die tägliche Analyse hier sehen:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%C3%BCnchen/Transportation/Analyse

und unter 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/M%c3%bcnchen#Status

gibts bei "Transportation" noch mehr Erläuterungen.

Viele Grüße aus Ottobrunn
Toni
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-09-13 15:44:38+00:00): Is this an office or just a personal home?
eggie (2017-08-30 17:17:16+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-08-30 17:21:59+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51586993
Hier zie je wat je hebt gedaan. Editor iD ken ik niet zo goed. Volgens mij is de Q toets ook voor rechthoekig maken van huizen.Anders even rechtsklikken. Dan krijg je een keuze menu.
De wegen zullen meestal highway=track zijn.
eggie (2017-08-30 17:30:17+00:00): De mensen van HOT valideren je werk.. daar ga ik nu even niet tussen zitten. Probeer niet te veel edits in één changeset te zetten. Dus regelmatig saven.. anders is het lastig te controleren.
ika-chan! (2017-08-30 17:16:05+00:00): Sorry, typo in changeset comment - supposed to be Landuse and service roads traced in according to DigitalGlobe-Premium.
Olyon (2018-02-27 14:44:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous ajoutez des sous stations c'est bien mais pourquoi les mettre à la place des centrale électrique power=plant. Les power=substation sont une partie ou à coté des centrales.
Sigo (2018-03-02 18:10:25+00:00): Désolé, c'est une erreur de ma part.
GerdP (2017-08-31 08:34:38+00:00): Hi!
I've fixed typo highway=red on 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520059565
After doing that I found that the previous tag value unclassified was probably better as this road comes as unclassified from the tertiary in the west. I'd prefer unclassified for Dijksterbuursterlaan and maybe different maxspeed tags.
JeroenHoek (2017-08-31 10:06:45+00:00): Danke. Das war ein Autovervollständigungsfehler meinerseits.
GerdP (2017-08-31 10:07:42+00:00): Aber Du bleibst bei residential ?
JeroenHoek (2017-08-31 10:37:34+00:00): Ich hab es geändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51608935#map=18/53.14033/5.43973&layers=N
GerdP (2017-08-31 10:45:47+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung :-)
Nakaner (2017-08-31 08:07:57+00:00): Hi Bonix-Mapper,

could you please use a dedicated account for doing any data imports? The Import Guidelines requires you to do so. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Thank you.

Best reagards

Michael
Bonix-Mapper (2017-09-01 20:13:01+00:00): Hello Michael,

Are you part of any of the OSM infrastructure groups? I looked up your user link and did not understand how you were alerted of the import.

You are right. I already had a user for this but, due to the difficulty to switch accounts, I did not do this before.

My bulk import account will be Bonix-Importer. I will leave it reserved for the bulk import of building data from my city.

It may even mix a bit because most of what I do is import the data from roads and buildings. For bulk imports I will only use the Bonix-Importer.

I'll update the wiki about it: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PMSP_Buildings_Import


All right?

Best Regards.
Nakaner (2017-09-02 10:27:27+00:00): Hi Bonix-Mapper,

I am not member of any official group. It is not necessary to be member of any official group to look if people comply with the rules and to revert "bad edits" (newbie errors, vandalism, mechanical edits/imports which clearly break multiple rules of the guideline).

I don't want to revert this import just because you used the wrong user account. I found a discussion on the Imports mailing list and the wiki page. I considered this as a bulk import because your changeset exceeded the limit of objects which you could upload in one changeset (10,000 objects). I think that manual drawing results in smaller changesets if you upload your changes in a sensible interval.

The guideline requires you to use a dedicated account for the import to make a rollback easier if it is necessary and to separate on-the-ground mapping and third-party data.

I myself regularly use multiple accounts (Nakaner and Nakaner-repair). You have to switch the account at JOSM settings every time. Maybe someone develops a user switching plugin for JOSM at some point in future.

Best regards

Michael
Andreas Binder (2017-08-30 19:00:45+00:00): Hi Steffen,
ford=yes steht für einen Weg, der unter Wasser steht (Furt, siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ford). So, wie Du es eingetragen hast, wäre das auf der kompetten Weglänge der Fall. Stimmt das wirklich?
Grüße
Andreas
SteffenHermann (2017-08-31 05:27:02+00:00): Hi Andreas,
danke, ist entfernt.
Viele Grüße
Steffen
SomeoneElse (2017-11-26 15:14:47+00:00): Hi,
Looking at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=pillbox#values the most popular tagging seems to be "military=bunker" together with "bunker_type=pillbox".  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1916451008 is an example of it.
Best Regards,
Andy
stevea (2017-08-31 18:58:42+00:00): Hi dwl-sdca:  Might I ask you to read up on our wiki page for access=* before you use a tag like access=restricted on roads like these?  The value "restricted" on the access tag isn't documented.  Please consider changing this to access=no emergency=fire.  Or, if it is truly private, access=private emergency=fire.  Also, the name=* tag shouldn't contain " (private/emergency)" as name=* only should contain a name, not other data.  Thank you.
blackadder (2017-08-31 08:46:39+00:00): Barry, Thanks for contributing to OSM, however I'm going to revert your edit. That section of the canal towpath forms part of National Cycle Network route 5. When we tag we tag for the highest level usage so its appropriate that its set as cycleway. As you say cycling is permitted, as is walking of course.
Mapeiro (2017-08-30 23:24:10+00:00): Olá,

Você aumeutou a classificação da LMG-642 mas ela não é uma BR. Qual a razão?
GerdP (2017-08-31 09:50:10+00:00): Hi!
Is Ascenseur really the name of the footway?
cchatfield (2017-08-31 18:43:40+00:00): There is a small very short footpath from Rue Latour de Brie to a lift. Then there is a footpath bridge from the lift to Rue de Pau.
Ascenseur is the French word for a lift.
GerdP (2017-08-31 18:45:16+00:00): Yes, that's why I don't think that this is the name of the footway.
R0bst3r (2017-09-03 21:14:43+00:00): Hallo vv01f,
disused:shop=yes kann man hier verwenden.
Vielleicht ist aber auch shop=vacant für einen Leerstand gewollt?
Viele Grüße
eggie (2019-11-23 09:31:02+00:00): Dag McWerf3...  De name=Verzorgingshuis verwijderd en tagging veranderd naar community_centre Cultureel Centrum Sterrenburg. Fysio toegevoegd. 
MVG,
Eggie
naoliv (2017-08-31 01:36:37+00:00): Lucas, você está reclassificando vários trechos e várias rodovias sem esperar o final da discussão e votação, além de aumentar a hierarquia de vias que nem fazem parte da propsota
Por exemplo, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504503272

Qual a razão de ter aumentado para secondary, sendo que ela nem é asfaltada?

Não é correto o que você está fazendo.
iandees (2017-09-01 18:03:22+00:00): Hi! It looks like you added a line in the middle of the water and tagged it as a road. Is this a ferry or boat operator route? If so, it should be tagged with route=ferry instead of highway=service. Can you provide more information about the service you're trying to map? I doesn't look like anyone operates from the dock you're drawing from, so I'm going to delete this route for now.
iandees (2017-09-01 18:04:45+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51651701.
user_5359 (2017-08-31 09:40:09+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Private Informationen sind in OSM nicht gewünscht, deshalb habe ich das „Mathilda Traumhaus“ bereits gelöscht. Aber Du hast die Geschossanzahl von 2 auf 3 geändert. 

Könntest Du mal die Definition https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels lesen und sagen, ob es zwei oder drei Geschosse sind (Dach zählt nicht mit)?
literan (2017-10-18 10:00:11+00:00): Здравствуйте, по поводу вот этой линии https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520108243#map=17/55.74077/37.65997 Обычно принято встречные направления улиц показывать отдельными линиями если есть физический разделитель либо если не менее 2 полос в каждом из направлений. Здесь не тот случай, поэтому я исправлю.
RedGel (2017-09-21 19:58:52+00:00): Adding this comment for information.

After making this change I did done some further research to cross validate the name of the bus stop from other sources.

The information did not agree. So, I have since contacted the operator to inquire as to if the signage is correct.

After investigation by the operator, the conclusion was indeed that the name on the sign (Anderida Road) is incorrect and will be replaced.

When the sign is replaced I will update with the correct name based on a survey.
user_5359 (2017-08-31 16:40:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! you are open the whole week or only monday until friday?
PlaneMad (2017-09-22 20:25:22+00:00): Thanks for mapping! you seem to have dragged a few roads in Colaba by mistake, fixing them for you
Christophe Mathieu (2018-01-13 09:32:53+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/51592361
Saikat Maiti (2017-10-06 10:25:21+00:00): @TidoB I am quite sure that these round shaped objects are not buildings. Please check! Happy mapping.
Constable (2018-01-22 08:02:29+00:00): ciao, per favore quando modifichi la mappa basandoti su informazioni contenute nelle note, ricordati di inserire tutte le informazioni fornite e di commentare la nota. Nel caso poi non rimangano informazioni che necessitano di una seconda risposta da parte dell'autore della nota, chiudila pure.
Questa è rimasta aperta, non è stata commentata e un mesetto fa l'autore faceva notare che le informazioni da lui fornite non erano state aggiunte
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1067372
Grazie, ciao
kaitu (2018-01-22 15:29:41+00:00): Ti ringrazio per avere integrato le informazioni su questa pizzeria. La pizzeria l'avevo aggiunta con un survey, non mi ero neppure accorto che ci fosse una nota a riguardo. Se hai inserito tutto, puoi chiudere la nota, io non ho altre informazioni da aggiungere. Ciao
Constable (2018-01-22 15:50:53+00:00): ciao, grazie per la risposta, scusa, davo per scontato che avessi visto la nota, come non detto :D
BCNorwich (2017-08-31 05:49:28+00:00): With just a name the feature would not be rendered, I've dded the building and a few more details.
R0bst3r (2017-08-31 05:51:24+00:00): Danke!
YieldMapper (2017-08-30 20:40:29+00:00): Bitte reviewen!
R0bst3r (2017-09-01 22:07:38+00:00): Hallo YieldMapper,
sieht gut aus, ich habe dennoch die layer=0 vom Imbis und Bettenlager entfernt. War da level=0 gemeint?
Viele Grüße
YieldMapper (2017-09-02 12:58:58+00:00): Danke. Zu layer=0: Na ich meinte einfach "Erdgeschoss". Also in der Tat sollte es level=0 sein.

Übrigens wird der "Korridor" gerade in hohen Zoomleveln nicht gerendert auf OSM: https://pageshot.net/iFwa8ER8an0PaC5i/www.openstreetmap.org
Auch in niedrigeren nicht richtig: https://pageshot.net/0sTSpnPYnswOe2MN/www.openstreetmap.org
R0bst3r (2017-09-03 20:02:11+00:00): Das liegt wohl zum einen an den Kacheln, die nicht neu gerendert wurden, zum anderen zeigt die Standardkarte Korridor wohl nicht an. Wenn du rechts, aber auf eine andere Ebene umschaltest, z.B. Humanitarian, sieht man sie.
R0bst3r (2017-09-03 20:03:08+00:00): Oder openstreetmap.de
YieldMapper (2017-09-06 21:31:00+00:00): Stimmt, bei OSM.org ist es jetzt nicht mehr sichtbar…
rmikke (2017-08-30 23:30:43+00:00): Odpisałem na forum.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=661577#p661577
Fod (2017-08-31 08:54:50+00:00): Underligt - Salon Sarah har ikke ligget på adressen i de sidste 5-7 år..., så at skrive
source:name=onsite survey
og
source:shop=onsite survey
er måske liiiiige at stramme den lidt.
Nå. Jeg retter til og sletter.
Venligst,
Jakob
Hjart (2017-08-31 09:26:27+00:00): De tags blev tilføjet adressenoden for 2 år siden (gæt af hvem): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/340697409/history
Jørn har bare flyttet tags derfra.
corfede (2017-09-06 07:20:34+00:00): Ma è stata realizzata una nuova rotatoria? Dalle ortofoto del 2016 si vede ancora l'incrocio dove è possibile anche girare per invertire la marcia, ma non si tratta di una rotatoria. Se invece è stata realizzata una nuova rotatoria quest'anno è comunque da correggere perchè le strade si sovrappongono alla nuova rotatoria che hai disegnato. Se hai bisogno d'aiuto o vuoi che correggo io fammi sapere, ma prima di tutto vorrei capire se c'è nuova rotatoria o meno. Grazie mille. Federico.
Alan (2017-08-31 00:27:18+00:00): Thanks for joining OpenStreetMap! When you're drawing buildings, you can also right-click and choose the "square" option to adjust the angles of the building to make them more rectangular.
Alan (2017-08-31 00:26:07+00:00): Thanks for joining OpenStreetMap! When you're drawing buildings, you can also right-click and choose the "square" option to adjust the angles of the building to make them more rectangular.
Matt Priour (2017-08-31 02:17:01+00:00): Thanks so much for the helpful hint. Looking forward to make more contributions