piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LaCrier (2020-08-10 10:10:51+00:00): Hi, by mistake! I have corrected that. Thanks for pointing this out. It is ambigous wether it is an "unclassified" street from the bridge, as one of the lanes splits away but it is definitely not "residiential". All the best!
*abq* (2021-02-16 15:31:59+00:00): Hallo Jabali,
der Allmendweg ist eine Zufahrt zum Steinhäusle und hat keinen Durchgangsverkehr, von daher service. Der letzte Abschnitt ist als privat beschildert (wie es bereits eingetragen war).
VG Reiner
Kovoschiz (2020-07-09 20:11:56+00:00): `=private` and `=yes` don't mean the same thing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87768125
abakus_uploader (2020-07-09 22:32:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2020-07-11 16:48:04+00:00): Hello Aguliasmile
Thanks for mapping on this project
Honestly, your mappings are a bit below the quality standards of HOTOSM,
The 3 buildings you mapped here are not accurate mapped and squared
Please improve your mapping skills
Here is something to read
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
Best regards and keep mapping
Kovoschiz (2020-07-09 20:12:30+00:00): Please check your understanding before mass editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87768422
Kovoschiz (2020-07-09 20:13:26+00:00): The only change that is valid is in reducing an over-broad `access=no`
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87768641
SomeoneElse (2020-08-01 10:53:28+00:00): Hello elman_ales,
Please use more meaningful changeset comments than simply "corrected".  As you can see from looking at http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=1346817403 , the name of this village has changed many times over the last few days.  If you'd like more information about how names in OSM are used, please read https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  If you've got any further questions, you can email OSM's Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
4004 (2020-07-11 22:51:13+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
в поле Название мы пишем только название (интернет магазин - это не название)
также ознакомтесь с документацией часов работы на этой странице, чтобы она была хоть кому то полезна https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:opening_hours
Kovoschiz (2020-07-09 20:14:20+00:00): Please understand how `=permit` works as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87769220
Atal Hikr (2023-02-19 14:50:38+00:00): Buongiorno. Noto solo oggi che a suo tempo ha inserito la codifica REI del sentiero H20 in Valle Strona di Postua indicando, nel codice REI del sentiero, la sigla della provincia di Biella BI. La valle in questione però è parte in provincia di Biella, parte in Provincia di Vercelli e il sentiero H20 viene a trovarsi interamente nella parte in provincia di Vercelli. Se non mi sfugge qualcosa, la codifica andrebbe rivista. Provincia a parte, non mi è chiaro come debbano essere valorizzati gli altri elementi che compongono il codice, pertanto mi rimetto ad un suo intervento o indicazione su come fare. Cordiali saluti.
Jrachi (2023-02-19 17:47:49+00:00): Ciao.
Quando lo inserii non guardai proprio i confini provinciali.
E si tratta di un dato ufficiale! Così risulta nel catasto provinciale biellese e anche in quello regionale (assieme ad un EBIAH2000A)
Ho segnalato alla SOSEC ed alla provincia di Biella l'incongruenza.

Per ora lascialo così, aspettiamo la decisione ufficiale.

Ivo, Jrachi
Jrachi (2023-02-19 17:59:30+00:00): E = Piemonte
BI= Biella
A= zona (per Biella c'è solo quella, ma serve perché altre province hanno più zone)
H=settore (Valle del Basso Sessera e dello Strona)
20= numero CAI (o comunque un numero e basta)
00= codice del manutentore. Una cosa che non può essere usata perché in Piemonte i "manutentori" sono centinaia.
0=riservato per il futuro
È in progetto a livello sia SOSEC che regionale di eliminare questi tre zeri, assolutamente inutili e che lo rendono diverso dal codice di catasto nazionale.
Infine l'ultimo carattere è 0 per i percorsi principali o una lettera per le varianti.
Atal Hikr (2023-02-19 19:01:07+00:00): Grazie delle risposte. 
Per quanto riguarda il sentiero H20, dovrebbe coincidere con il sentiero 728 della provincia di Vercelli, a giudicare da questa scheda:
https://rilevatorisosecp.it/sentiero/singolo/EVCA7280000
Le località di inizio e fine sono esattamente quelle: da Roncole di Postua all'alpe Panin. Il tracciato gpx scaricabile dal link di cui sopra però non c'entra assolutamente nulla: è il tracciato di un percorso brevissimo con partenza da Crevacuore.
Inoltre in loco il segnavia 728 non credo di averlo mai visto. Tra l'altro le schede di tutti i sentieri della Valsesia sono presenti sul sito del CAI di Varallo ma non esiste un sentiero 728.
Mi sembra una questione un po' ingarbugliata, probabilmente legata al fatto che la zona di Postua, essendo sul confine tra le due provincie, fisicamente nel bacino del Sessera ma amministrativamente sotto Vercelli, è un po' terra di tutti e di nessuno. La documentazione del sentiero H20 guarda caso è sul sito del CAI Valsessera...
Jrachi (2023-02-21 21:34:39+00:00): Ho avuto risposta dall'IPLA
>E si lo sappiamo ma il comune di Postua era stato considerato come rete escursionistica all'interno del biellese e sono stati attribuiti codici di Biella con cartelli e tutto. Bisognerà cambiarli prima  o poi però per ora la situazione di fatto è questa.
Atal Hikr (2023-02-22 06:30:37+00:00): Grazie Ivo. Perciò anche su OSM lasciamo tutto così, per il momento...
Che cos'è l'IPLA? 

PS: EBIAH2000A immagino che sia la variante marcata sul terreno H20bis, che ho mappato su OSM, il cosiddetto "sentiero basso": c'è qualche guado da fare ma si risparmia sul dislivello rispetto al sentiero H20 

Andrea
Jrachi (2023-02-22 07:27:21+00:00): IPLA=Istiituto Piante da Legno e Affini.
È l'ente che si occupa del catasto regionale. Ha facoltà di legge su mandato della Regione sulla rete escursionistica, dove passa, quali sono i codici, dove sono i settori ecc. ecc.
H20A. Altro percorso che cambierà nome. Mi è utile sapere che sul posto si chiama H20bis.
gismatsh (2020-07-10 04:47:39+00:00): Əla
eggie (2020-07-09 15:19:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Tip.. Het beste kun je vortaan de BAG adresnode intact laten. Daar staat de Kadasterinfo op. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-09 15:24:11+00:00): Benjamin.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de BAG adresnodes. 
MVG,
Eggie
YraFyra (2020-07-10 21:17:05+00:00): Hej
Välkommen till.Osmi

Något blev fel med gångbron mellan Gallerian och Punkt i denna ändring. Titta gärna på det!
ACarlotti (2020-07-10 01:45:19+00:00): Hello michellefarns, welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your contribution.

There are a couple of small issues I've noticed in this changeset. Firstly, there are a couple of nodes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2085120254 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/27234954) where you have removed some of the tags, with the remaining tags not making sense by themselves. If the café and the car park no longer exist (and are not just temporarily shut), then these nodes should be deleted. Otherwise, the tags should be changed to include at least one tag specifying what type of thing the node actually represent.

Secondly, this changeset covers (at least) two separate unrelated groups of edits, which are in different countries. This makes it difficult for people to work out what has been affected by the changeset (e.g. the 'History' option on the website only shows the bounding box). In future I would encourage you to split your edits into separate changesets covering smaller geographical regions. In general, if two edits are unrelated (roughly speaking), then they should probably be in different changesets.

Finally, it is recommended that changesets include a tag indicating the source(s) used in the edit (e.g. things like 'local knowledge' or 'Esri imagery') - this makes it easier for other people to understand why someone made a particular change, and whether it might be a mistake.

Anyway, thanks for helping the project, and if you can fix those two nodes I mentioned, that would be great (and don't be afraid to ask for help if needed).
R3gi (2020-07-10 21:51:57+00:00): Ahoj, všiml jsem si, že v Nučické ulici jsi přidal dům roztodivného tvaru, který ve skutečnosti neexistuje. Předpokládám, že se jedná o vložení pomocí nějakého automatizovaného nástroje. Tak jen bacha, asi nefunguje úplně správně :-)
Budovu odebírám.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-07-27 03:37:00+00:00): revertido pois passou uma via que passava automovel para area de lazer?
vhpontes (2020-08-14 14:12:42+00:00): Poderia me dizer onde especificamente?
Deve ter sido algum engano.
Obrigado
literan (2020-07-09 15:34:54+00:00): у вас тут аж тройная вложенность объекта "Детская площадка". Так быть не должно. Один объект на местности - один в базе. Сами исправите или мне почикать?
ks1v (2020-07-09 23:08:36+00:00): Хочу сам, надо же учиться. Тогда вопросы:
1. Есть участок парка, который официально назыавется "Игровая площадка Салют", в нём девять отдельных игровых площадок со своими названиями. Я предполагаю, что если отдельные игровые площадки внутри этого сектора парка должны остаться "игровыми площадками", то тогда нужно удалить большой контур и создать отношение над отдельными площадками и назвать его "игровая площадка Салют", так?
2. Внутри каждой игровой площадки есть отдельные структуры. Читал на форуме, что тогда нужно создать отдельный полигон leisure=playground и внутри него уже объекты Play Structure (в терминах редактора iD) playground=structure с уточнениями. Вроде бы так и сделал.
literan (2020-07-10 07:04:41+00:00): судя по сайту, детская площадка одна - "Салют", а внутри нее -некие комплексы
http://www.park-gorkogo.com/places/228
Вот и вопрос, как обозначить эти комплексы (я не знаю, если честно)

Да, по второму пункту верно, но одна качель внутри мегакачелей все равно обозначена как площадка, а не как структура

Возможно, выходом будет обозначить всю площадку как playground, а каждый из 9 комплексов - как structure по их основному предназначению (а внутри них уже мелкие объекты не мапить)?
ks1v (2020-07-10 11:58:49+00:00): 1. формально да, всё это считается одной гигантской площадкой. На месте же это просто участок парка, без отдельного входа и чёткой границы, на отдельных друг от друга полянах которого расположены отдельные игровые площадки, поэтому сомневаюсь, что будет логично отметить их как structure. Тем более тогда встанет вопрос, как отмечать объекты на самих площадках - странно же их не мапить вообще, они же есть на земле и большая часть из них довольно заметные. Поэтому и предлагаю оформить все отдельные площадки и структуры на них и рядом с ними как relation.

2. Да, точно, исправил https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87815978
dvyasha (2020-07-09 14:48:56+00:00): #MapWithAI & #https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Facebook_AI-Assisted_Road_Tracing
WoodWoseWulf (2020-07-16 02:59:18+00:00): Why have you added so much water here?
Almehza (2020-07-17 10:59:57+00:00): Hello, it is water pipes areas in my country where it is area that cant be used for other purposes what types should i use for it ?

and for the block of houses i didnt know that i cant put a block of houses as house type . my area is blank and i heared that blind people use this mapp so i wanted to help. I added hundredes of houses and told my family and friends to conturbitue. if you can view the area before a month and today you will notice how many houses i added
for the paths I only use pathes that already exist.these are resdintal areas and path are everywhere.

I might doing things wrong but please tell me what to fix so i can help community, i will change block of houses to a single houses but what shoud water pipes areas be? and why you are not agreeing with the paths ? this area is full of paths which i reflected in map

thanks for reviewing
WoodWoseWulf (2020-07-17 12:13:48+00:00): Hello Almehza,

Thank you for your reply. It is good to hear from you! I am glad that it seems you are enthusiastic when it comes to adding to the map!

The water tagging you used (In English, it is natural=water) implies water at ground level such as a pond, lake or river. You can use man_made=pipeline for pipes, however you would need an OSM compatible source to add these features (see the legal page on the OSM wiki for more information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ)

If you want to tag how land is used, you can use landuse instead of building tags. For example, places people live can be landuse=residential (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential) and places where people do business can be landuse=commercial (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial). Building tags can be added inside of those landuses if you know buildings are there or you can trace particular buildings using satellite imagery.

Here are some examples of strange paths you have added:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825423258
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/825423257
These do not appear to match any imagery - just because you can walk across a location does not mean that it is a footpath - if everywhere was a footpath we would make quite a mess out of the map.
rainerU (2020-07-10 09:53:15+00:00): Seltsamer Name für eine Feldscheune. Bitte korrigiere das mal. Bei der Gelegenheit kannst du das Gebäude auch rechtwinklig machen (Auswählen + Taste Q) und ggf. den building-Typ auf "barn" setzen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87772121
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-07-09 22:01:09+00:00): Why you are creating for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7699868689#map=16/51.0964/17.0263 ? Railway station is mapped already.
maraf24 (2020-07-14 10:51:09+00:00): Wycofane.
peppone84 (2020-08-29 16:00:50+00:00): Servus, ich hab den Note a bissal abgewandelt :) Aber ja, die Ausführung in scharfen Winkeln um das Haus herum is irgendwie... lustig :)
Grüße, Peppone
opendcc (2020-08-29 16:51:43+00:00): Och, die Note war ja noch freundlich ;-) Ich würde den verantwortlichen Planer dazu verdonnern, diesen Weg täglich als Arbeitsweg fahren zu müssen.
eggie (2020-07-09 15:33:13+00:00): Meestal zijn die doorsteekjes highway=path en niet footway
Je kunt foot=yes en bicycle=yes taggen voor de duidelijkheid.  (Niet =designated)
Het is geen sidewalk in de zin van Dus sidewalk=yes kan weg.
Verder heb je er een doorwaadbare plaats van gemaakt met ford=yes 
Dat zal wellicht niet.
Wanneer er een betonblok ligt kun je barrier=block taggen op een node. een paaltje is barrier=bollard.
Wanneer daar ook brommers en snorfietsen mogen rijden kun je moped en mofa=yes ook nog toevoegen.
Zou eerst even naar die doorwaadbare plaats kijken.

Succes,
eggie
eggie (2020-07-09 15:33:31+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87772754
user_5359 (2020-07-09 16:10:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between description and name. You describe the function of the building and don't add the name. Also we use mixcased characters for the name value.
eggie (2020-07-09 15:37:27+00:00): Lijkt me oke... 

Alle niet doorgaande straten zijn eigenlijk highway=residential  en niet unclassified. De doorgaande straten gewoon op unclassified houden. Het wijkje aan de westkant lijkt gereed dus dat vlak landuse=construction zou wellicht weg kunnen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-07-09 15:38:30+00:00): Het westelijk deel van die halve cirkel is nog niet verbonden met de Runningstraat.
Saritha K S (2020-07-10 09:43:42+00:00): One building crosses another. The edges of the features do not overlap the other features. Pls correct the issue
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87773213
Protoxenus (2020-07-16 14:44:07+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier vor ein paar Tagen den Haupttag highway= entfernt. Hat das einen besonderen Grund oder war das ein Versehen? Wenn es ein versehen war, ändere es bitte, ansonsten wäre ein Begründung, warum der tag entfernt wurde, angebracht.
Gruß Protoxenus
AndySchulte (2020-07-18 07:44:35+00:00): Hallo Protoexenus,

danke dir für den Hinweis. Ich habe keine Ahnung was da passiert ist da ich lediglich den Ortsnamen an den Gebäuden korrigiert habe. Habe den tag wiederhergestellt.

Gruß Andy
Protoxenus (2020-07-18 08:13:32+00:00): Danke,
Protoxenus
eggie (2020-07-09 16:16:11+00:00): Marcel.. Je hebt een turnrestrictie gemaakt, maar er staat vast geen bord Verboden links af. Nog sterker. Zo'n bord bestaat niet (meer)
Wel bestaat het bord van verplichte rijrichting rechtdoor. Staat dat er? 

Het kan natuurlijk eenrichtingsverkeer zijn daar. dan oneway=yes taggen op de rijbaan. 
De wegen zou je nog een keer kunnen omtaggen naar highway=residential. De afslagbeperking "moet" er af. 
Gr eggie
Aidyns87 (2020-07-09 22:00:23+00:00): Все правильно
eggie (2020-07-09 16:19:17+00:00): Oke..Elk begin is moeilijk. Geen doorwaadbare plaats dus.. :) .  sidewalk=yes kan weg. Het is geen langsliggend trottoir.
surface=paved .. mits dat zo is komt de routering ten goede, want een footway wordt als onverhard gezien.
Kijk je nog even?

Eggie
di4tu2 (2020-11-06 00:19:23+00:00): Hi

If this section of Railton Road (24687123) between Hurst Street and Rymer Street is now closed to motor traffic, with the existing one-ways it appears to be impossible to drive to Herne Hill Station... Is this correct?  Or is Rymer Street now two-way?  Thanks
tastrax (2020-09-09 00:19:15+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
user_5359 (2020-07-09 19:22:30+00:00): Hello! Please use the key amenity instead amenitiy(see https://www.osm.org/way/824621880/history
theArchDruid (2020-07-09 19:24:45+00:00): Thanks for catching this! 

My building preset tag for amenity was incorrectly spelled! 

It should be correct now.

-theArchDruid
GOwin (2020-07-10 07:55:29+00:00): It's good to see you back and contributing again to #OSMaPaaralan! I hope you've been doing well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87775184
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-07-09 22:00:15+00:00): Jesteś pewien że "Sankt Hedwigsdorf" to aktualnie używana przez Niemców nazwa?
Minh Nguyen (2020-07-09 17:42:33+00:00): Thank you for taking care of this update. It’s very timely considering today’s Supreme Court ruling in McGirt v. Oklahoma. https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/4113 was unfortunate timing, but at least we’ll have something to show upfront to people who are now interested in the reservation boundaries.
Baloo Uriza (2020-07-09 19:45:30+00:00): It was actually already there before but under the boundary=protected_area protect_class=24 scheme, which it was suggested that I update.  I literally woke up to that ruling this morning.  I suspect Oklahoma is now much smaller with three exclaves (the Pawnee triangle near Tulsa, the southwest corner and Fort Sill's c1890 boundary), but not entirely sure yet.
Minh Nguyen (2020-07-09 20:57:20+00:00): If I understand correctly, Oklahoma’s border can remain at its current size and overlap the reservation boundaries, the same way that Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah include areas that are formally part of the Navajo Nation and Hopi Reservation.
phidauex (2020-07-09 22:18:55+00:00): True, the reservation areas, while not subject to the criminal laws of Oklahoma, are still "in" Oklahoma from a boundaries perspective, which is similar to the other major reservations. The legal details are somewhat beyond me (and probably most people other than legal specialists), but the short answer to "Is an Indian Reservation a State?" is "no". BTW, thanks for making the update, the court ruling is a big deal, and map visibility is an important way for people to understand the implications to them.
Glassman (2020-09-24 02:09:24+00:00): Google finally added the Cherokee Nation - and got credit. Where is ours? https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/23/us/cherokee-nation-reservation-google-maps-trnd/index.html
Baloo Uriza (2020-09-24 02:43:27+00:00): Right?  Depressing.
Frans S (2020-07-11 13:02:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key.  46 out of 48 mappings are not proper squared.
When you want to map series of identical buildings, use the copy and past command. (Ctr-C, move the cursor to the centre of the next building, Ctr-V) adjust with the M or R key,
Please solve also the issues which comes up in the Issue triangle on the right hand menu.
Best regards
eggie (2020-07-09 18:56:19+00:00): Hi HuguesA
Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
Greetz,
eggie
ma-rt-in (2020-07-10 06:06:01+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe deine Änderung wieder rückgänig gemacht. Zwar wird der Abschnitt von einem Radweg genutzt, jedoch ist er auch zugleich zufahrt zu den weiterem Wirtschaftsweg.
vg
muralito (2020-07-09 20:13:47+00:00): Hola.

Agregaste bosque pero borraste el club hipico. ¿Fue a proposito? ¿No esta mas el club ahi?

Saludos.
eggie (2020-07-09 18:41:25+00:00): Marcel .. Lijkt me oke zo.. De resten van die turnrestriction heb ik verwijderd. foot-yes ook verwijderd. Dat hoeft niet op een voetpad. Kwaad kan het ook niet.
Evt. kun je nog surface=paved (paving_stones? asphalt?)  taggen op het stukje voetpad.
Kort door de bocht. Staat er een bord wandelpad of is het duidelijk voor voetgangers (ik denk het niet) dan highway=footway .. anders highway=path taggen.
Je edits...https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87778848 'k Zie dat exit=yes al weg is?  
Gr eggie
Nakaner (2020-07-10 07:01:13+00:00): Hi,

in this changeset, you added a building in the middle of the Artic Sea. I assume that this was not intentional but would like to ask you to be more careful during editing.

Best regards

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87779887
SomeoneElse (2020-07-09 20:07:27+00:00): The main aim of this change was to move Fylingdales Moor https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2165735 to it's actual location (near Fylingdales village).  I also got the opportunity to add Sleights Moor https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354183146 and Goathland Moor https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824661041 .  Fylingdales Moor I can vouch for the name of; the others are from OS StreetView.
I've already added a fair bit of "from survey" for the Lyke Wake Walk and paths off it that goes east-west through here; I'm about to do the same for the C2C.
VA00 (2022-01-30 10:25:47+00:00): Mam deja vu, że skasowałem tu ścieżkę w 2019 ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/213555627) , i pojawiła się ponownie. Czy tu  naprawdę da  się przejść przez tory?
olo81 (2022-01-30 22:53:14+00:00): Mapowałem szlak według śladu. Rzeczywiście coś jest nie tak. 
Wywalam tą ścieżkę. 
Szlak też ma inny przebieg z tego co widzę. Trzeba poprawić.
VA00 (2022-02-01 08:05:16+00:00): Szlak w terenie jest dobrze oznakowany, ale jakoś nie mogę się zebrać aby go w całości objechać. Za długi.