piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-01-21 16:50:45+00:00): Mijn advies zou dan zijn om gewoon om alleen man_made =windmill te gebruiken ipv watermill.. Dat is het zeker niet. 

Het is een poldermolentje... Ook even geen idee of daar een aparte tag voor is.
eggie (2022-01-22 08:49:29+00:00): ... hoewel... man_made=windmill is meer bedoeld voor klassieke molens. Dat is zo'n apparaat zeker niet.
Het komt nog het meest in de buurt van een man_made=waterpump.. al pompt het dan weer geen grondwater op, maar water van de ene sloot naar andere. 
Vraagje voor het forum van OSM denk ik.
eggie
eggie (2022-01-22 10:22:38+00:00): Het bedrijf dat ze nog steeds maakt vertaalt de molen met
B4 windwatermill
Dus dan zou je extra kunnen bijtaggen
windmill:type=b4_windwatermill

https://bosman-water.nl/en/products/pumping-installations/b4-windwater-mill/
eggie (2022-01-21 16:27:23+00:00): Die verbinding is ingetekend om de kanoroute te laten routeren. Die komt dan uit op de kanooverdraagplaats. Voorgaande mapper is een fervente en lokale  kanoroutemapper. 

eggie
eggie (2022-01-21 16:28:34+00:00): reverted by changeset #116438927
PT-53 (2022-01-22 07:30:02+00:00): Hallo GO_OSM,
diese Linie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023351872/history
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-02-06 10:21:57+00:00): erledigt.
Danke
silversurfer83 (2022-01-24 18:08:24+00:00): Moin,
ist das noch irgendwas übrig von der Kirche? Falls ja, wäre ein lifecycle prefix, wie zB "razed" sinnvoller gewesen.
Laut deinem Profil hast du noch nicht so super viele Bearbeitungen gemacht. Falls du Fragen hast, oder Hilfe benötigst, meld dich gerne.
Aspirin500 (2022-01-26 22:18:50+00:00): Moin, 
von der Kirche ist nichts mehr übrig. Sie wurde komplett abgerissen. Auf dem Gelände werden bald Wohneinheiten entstehen.
German C (2022-01-23 16:53:55+00:00): Hola, por favor revisar, no existen alcaldias en el corregimiento de Cite de acuerdo al directorio oficial de municipios de la gobernación de santander https://www.santander.gov.co/index.php/atencion-al-ciudadano/directorios/directorio-municipios
HeKeIsDa (2022-01-24 01:42:39+00:00): Eso según del departamento de santander, mas no así  para nosotros los de la República de Facta de Galán
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-01-24 19:36:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116556130 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of unreliable and fake edits.
MxxCon (2022-01-21 23:04:12+00:00): Hello.
You changed a subway track to be a residential road. That's obviously incorrect.
You also deleted what appears to be correct tags from a community center building.
As such this edit is going to be reverted to restore the correct information.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116438745
Palolo (2022-04-22 15:29:57+00:00): Thank you for your first contribution to OSM. Please keep mapping and study the materials on the Tasking Manager to show how to map buildings. Thanks
redd (2023-01-15 12:40:54+00:00): Hallo Giftzwerg,
das von dir bearbeitete Verkehrsschild auf der grünen Wiese beim des ehemaligen Real-, jetzt Marktkaufparkplatzes ist dort fehl am Platz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6244903252/history

Ich gehe von einem Bearbeitungsfehler aus und bitte dich das nochmal anzusehen.

Vielen Dank,

redd
maro21 (2022-02-12 17:57:54+00:00): Czy stacje Wrocław Partynice i Wrocław Wojszyce są już czynne? Bo tagowanie jest sprzeczne - jest oczekiwana data otwarcia, która mówi że będzie czynna od marca oraz tagowanie oznaczające, że jest tu stacja.
mariotomo (2022-04-04 16:50:36+00:00): Hi "Lapibach", welcome to OSM. I see just 5 changesets (grouped contributions) on your name, and I wonder if you're still able to help the OSM project.  there's really very few mappers in Panama, one individual can mean a huge lot just by two hours every month.  hope to see you back.
no sé si prefieres comunicarse en Español, lo importante es entenderse.
Puxan (2022-01-28 15:52:39+00:00): Creo que el cambio de etiqueta no es correcto. Se trata de una reserva de agua para regadío. Puede verse claramente que el color del agua no es el de una piscina (puede verse una cerca) . igual puede decirse de los otros dos cambios introducidos en la misma isla de Menorca. 
Espero su respuesta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116439504
Susymala (2022-01-29 07:20:24+00:00): Correct. Sorry
Puxan (2022-01-29 18:28:43+00:00): Muchas gracias, sigue mapeando.  Joaquim
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116439504
user_8101879 (2022-01-21 17:44:45+00:00): Hi,

be careful, the good role is building, not buildilng
user_5359 (2022-01-21 17:17:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If this is a church, please have alook on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
adrienandrem (2022-04-28 16:07:50+00:00): Bonjour,

merci pour vos contributions à OpenStreetMap.

Je souhaite porter à votre attention le fait que les contributions doivent se faire selon les règles consultables dans le Wiki https://wiki.osm.org


Ici, pour les adresses de l'Allée Espéranza, il s'agit de placer dans l'attribut addr:street du bâtiment le nom de la rue *sans abbréviation*,
comme dit ici : « You should generally spell out abbreviations in full. » https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:street
et sans différence avec le nom de l'objet voie correspondant : https://osm.org/way/1022651268

À noter aussi que OpenStreetMap étant une base de données géographique, renseigner addr:city sur les bâtiment n'est pas utile,
car redondant avec le fait que l'objet soit compris dans les limites de la commune (https://osm.org/relation/1389637).


J'ai corrigé les adresses de l'Allée Espéranza (https://osm.org/changeset/120312707).

Vous souhaitant bonne cartographie
GinaroZ (2022-01-21 20:36:45+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Just wondering what it is you were looking to add here - is this separate to the rest of the  holiday park?
Seton Sands Holiday Home (2022-01-22 09:00:53+00:00): Hi, thanks for your message.  The property is within the holiday park but is a separate rental business.  Many of the properties are owned and rented privately.

I wanted an accurate way to identify location but also utilise the map to direct guests directly to the property when they arrive.

Regards,
G
GinaroZ (2022-01-23 20:30:16+00:00): Thanks, I've tagged it as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=chalet
Cristoffs (2022-01-25 08:15:27+00:00): Proszę opisuj swoje zmiany troszkę lepiej.
ottwiz (2022-01-21 17:09:25+00:00): I forgot to include Esri World Imagery too as a source, but i mostly used NAIP.
francians (2022-01-21 19:13:31+00:00): Buonasera

trattandosi di negozio di bici, andrebbe aggiunto il tag:

shop=bicycle

E se si effettuano riparazioni:

service:bicycle:repair=yes

Le consiglio di leggere la pagina wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbicycle

Francesco
Baloo Uriza (2022-01-22 00:25:42+00:00): Try using yo hours to get the correct value for opening_hours.  https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116440708
alessandrocarmeli (2022-02-06 21:27:30+00:00): non è un nome ufficiale. Meglio mtb:name
mueschel (2022-01-22 16:27:20+00:00): Hi,
you used some quite complicated keys here, e.g. 
route_marker:bicycle:black:forward:direction
It's always difficult to interpret tags that have a part of a free-text value in the key.
Please let me suggest to use a simple one instead
route_marker:bicycle:direction

Even if there are two colors on one marker, you can use a simple list like in the route_marker tag - just keep the order and amount of entries in the tag the same, and the user can easily combine the matching entries.
moje_konto (2022-01-23 18:00:03+00:00): That's true, quite often there are different markers of the same type at one place, two colours, or one colour but two marks with two directions depending if faced backward or forward.

Sometimes there is a direction marker only from one side, that's why forward/backward.

Similar like with traffic signs, can be two together, for example begining of bicycle allowed, and from other side bicycle not allowed.

At such case at first I used for a node - simple: bicycle=no;yes to match (with order) listed traffic signs, but it didn't work for some users, so I changed to bicycle:forward=no and bicycle:backward=yes.

So with route markers I added descriptive keys.

But yes, maybe would be better to move free-text to value.

.
Hmm, maybe like this? But this would require always adding "no_change" if there is standard marker, so not really nice:

route_marker:bicycle:colour = black;green

route_marker:bicycle:forward:direction = no_change;right

route_marker:bicycle:backward:direction = no_change;left

.
Or maybe better just move colour to value part:

route_marker:bicycle:colour = black;green

route_marker:bicycle:forward:direction = black:right

route_marker:bicycle:backward:direction = black:left

.
Other then that, it doesn't seem to be a way to simplify it with usefulness of direction. Then probably it could only state if there is change of direction for a given colour - like this:

route_marker:bicycle:direction_change = black
marczoutendijk (2022-02-06 12:37:54+00:00): Hallo meannder,
Je hebt in deze changeset (en nog meer in deze omgeving) een building=pig-farm neergezet.
Maar OSM heeft daar al een prima tag voor: building=sty
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dsty
Verander je ze zelf?
Groet,
Marc.
Cartographer10 (2022-01-23 11:09:22+00:00): Hey,

Een kleine tip. Ik zie dat je amenity=parking hebt toegevoegd. Daar kun je de tag parking=street_side aan toevoegen. amenity=parking wordt vaak alleen gebruikt voor grote parkeerterreinen. Door parking=street_side toe te voegen geef je aan dat het gewoon wat parkeervakken langs de weg zijn. Op onderstaande afbeelding zie je ook dat de P op de kaart dan kleiner wordt gerenderd.

Mvg,
Vincent

https://i.imgur.com/BYUbPq1.png

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking=street_side
Joost4000 (2022-01-23 11:26:07+00:00): Bedankt, heb het aangepast!
danieldegroot2 (2022-01-22 16:23:16+00:00): Hey Enock4seth,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023385918
Are you sure this is a soccer pitch? Only a clearing and road are visible. A square/rectangular-ish clearing with random bare patches does not make a soccer pitch. It's also overlapping the road.

Regards,

Daniel
danieldegroot2 (2022-01-22 17:45:41+00:00): Just fyi, found some drone footage as reference, looks like it's a grass field. May be used as public area, but it seems to mostly be used to get to the possible school building / the road.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CY_-hXosxS2/
Enock4seth (2022-01-22 20:06:38+00:00): Hi danieldegroot2,

Thank you for your comments and quality assurance. The usual setting for schools in Ghana, mostly public schools along main roads like this is one or two buildings with open green / ground space for sports preferably soccer and other functions e.g.: events, etc. I believe this, is what it should be, but I might be wrong and always open for correction. The road through the field is likely not a fancy and cool `highway=residential` you will see in other places. And the extent of the field might be smaller. 

Unfortunately, I am unable to view footage link you shared from a closed platform that I do not have access to.

Best,
Enock
Enock4seth (2022-01-22 20:12:00+00:00): Or the way through the field mostly used by pedestrians/cyclists and vehicles sometimes
Konkon153 (2022-01-21 18:07:12+00:00): [ und damit alle 292 Adressen in der Gemeinde Weitendorf vollständig angepasst ]
Carto'Cité (2022-07-06 17:09:33+00:00): Bonjour Furdrien,
J'ai passé cette portion de la route en shared_lane et non lane (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175847496 – cf. Ortho Express) mais si tu es passé ici récemment et que je me suis trompé, n'hésite pas à corriger ou me dire que je corrige. Merci pour tes nombreuses contributions :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Furdrien (2022-07-12 15:33:50+00:00): Bonjour Charles, 
En effet, j'ai pu y passer récemment et c'était bien une erreur de carto de ma part !

Merci beaucoup de ta vigilance et de ton travail remarquable !

Bien à toi !
Furdrien
Carto'Cité (2022-07-13 07:18:43+00:00): Merci pour ton retour :)
Charles
OptikalCrow (2022-03-31 20:54:30+00:00): I'm not sure this is standard tagging for parking lots- while yes parking is used by pedestrians I believe highway=pedestrian should be used for only pedestrian-oriented areas. amenity=parking areas are built for cars, not pedestrians.

I believe most data consumers also already understand amenity=parking to implicitly allow pedestrians anyways.
partytax (2022-03-31 22:40:48+00:00): I agree. Definitely a case of me mapping for the routing engine. I'll change in a moment.
German C (2022-01-23 17:13:36+00:00): Hola, por favor revisar, el corregimiento de Cincelada no es una municipalidad de acuerdo al directorio de municipio de la gobernación de Santander, https://www.santander.gov.co/index.php/atencion-al-ciudadano/directorios/directorio-municipios
HeKeIsDa (2022-01-24 01:36:33+00:00): Eso segun el departamento de santander, mas no asi   nosotros los de la Republica de Facta de Galán
cytryn (2022-01-21 19:25:10+00:00): Please, don't shorten the name. The rule commonly accepted by the polish community is to always use the first and last name.
VLD180 (2022-01-21 22:00:06+00:00): Cytryn, Thank you for your feedback and informing me about these community standards in Poland. I have restored the name to the prior version based on your recommendation
NedEX (2022-01-22 13:02:39+00:00): What's the sense in adding three fire hydrants across the whole europe? You also made three similar changes like this
grozsa11 (2022-01-22 17:44:41+00:00): Oh sorry, what is the officially accepted distance from two (or three) adding data in OSM in 24 hours?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-01-24 19:36:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116556130 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of unreliable and fake edits.
philippec (2022-01-21 20:43:49+00:00): Dank u.
dentonny (2022-01-25 12:54:25+00:00): Oorspronkelijk had ik dit aan de inkom geplaatst omdat ik de locatie niet zag.
Nu beter
Lejun (2022-09-17 07:32:32+00:00): Dit, t’es sur de ton coup ? J’ai comme un doute sur la position Av. Jean Moulin, les images suggèrent plutôt que la voie est de l’autre côté, si j’interprète correctement les images alors ils viennent de terminer des travaux avec du stationnement à ras de la chaussée
LySioS (2022-09-17 16:57:53+00:00): Effectivement, les anciennes ortho et les données fausses de la métropole m'ont induit en erreur je pense.
Corrigé,
Merci ;)
joost schouppe (2022-01-25 08:54:20+00:00): Hoi Jozin,
Heb je het bericht bij deze changeset gezien? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114462613
Het lijkt erop dat je hier hetzelfde doet...
jozin-belgium (2022-01-25 15:00:51+00:00): Ik vraag mij eigenlijk af waarom dat niet mag: omdat de fietspaden uiteindelijk toch duidelijk gescheiden zijn van de hoofdweg. Langs de ene weg duidelijk aangegeven in donkerroze tint, langs de andere weg door stippellijnen.
Thibault Rommel (2022-01-25 17:32:07+00:00): Hey
Dat zijn nu eenmaal de (internationale) afspraken. Meer info hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway#When%20not%20to%20use en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Cycleways
eggie (2022-01-21 20:23:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Het gebied van je edits is zo groot geworden omdat je de afrastering  hebt vastgeplakt aan de landuse=residential van Arnhem.
Probeer onderdelen los te houden. Dus geen bankjes vast te plakken aan de landuse.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116445855

Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt toegevoegd en verwijderd.
Meerdere aanpassingen zeggen niemand iets. 



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-01-21 20:41:39+00:00): Het hek heb ik even losgemaakt van die residential van Arnhem.
man_made = watertap geeft geen symbool in OSM.. amenity=drinking_water kun je dan evt. bijtaggen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water

MVG
eggie
Dardy (2022-03-28 19:58:28+00:00): Ciao Jrachi, mi sto occupando del rilevamento di questo percorso, purtroppo quella traccia è sbagliata ed è troppo simile al teorico presente sul catasto, ho paura che l'autore abbia importato il tracciato senza neanche verificarlo.
Per il momento metto la relazione come proposed=yes in modo che non risulti visibile sulle carte, giusto per non vanificare il lavoro che hai fatto.
Trovo comunque inutile e a volte pericoloso (come in questo caso) inserire le relazioni dei sentieri non accatastati, meglio concentrarsi su altro.
Jrachi (2022-03-28 20:22:18+00:00): Ok.
Il percorso è a catasto.
I tratti vanno verificati.
Quando metto "Manca rilevamento ufficiale" non significa che ho preso i dati "teorici" ma che il tracciato è composto (per la maggior parte) da way esistenti. Ovvero (non ricordo se è questo uno dei casi) che ho trovato uno o più way con riferimenti al ref e quindi fidandomi dei mappatori OSM.
Mettere come "proposed" è corretto se non esistono riferimenti locali, tipo cartelli con il ref. Ma è anche una buona soluzione in attesa di un tuo rilevamento sul campo.
Ciao.
Dardy (2022-03-28 21:08:58+00:00): Ho sistemato un po' la zona distinguendo ciò che è sentiero dalla strada forestale. Ho tolto una way aggiunta solo per collegare la relazione del percorso perchè c'era già  (qui il changeset se vuoi dargli un'occhiata https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119040017).
Quanto alla relazione dell'817 la sistemerò non appena ci saranno sviluppi col catasto.
Dardy (2022-04-04 13:13:17+00:00): Dopo le verifiche con ipla ho caricato quella che diventerà la versione definitiva del percorso.
Quanti altri percorsi non verificati hai creato, per lo meno in valle di Susa? C'è un modo per estrarmeli con overpass?
archpdx (2022-01-21 20:39:21+00:00): Thanks!
CurlingMan13 (2024-03-14 23:04:03+00:00): Descriptive names should not be used, particularly for the driving range.
nickjohnston (2022-01-21 20:47:44+00:00): I entered a changeset comment for this change, but JOSM didn't upload it. I encountered this bug before. It's rare and I can't reproduce it. Somehow JOSM gets into a state where the comment and source boxes are empty, but JOSM thinks a comment has been entered (as the warning for an empty or short comment is not shown). Any comment entered is disregarded. 

The comment for this changeset should have been:

"Improve alignment and geometry of buildings and roads in Charlton Kings and Leckhampton".
Jakka (2022-01-22 09:28:53+00:00): deze weg is ten noorden niet vastgemaakt aan de hoofdweg "Groeneweg" maar aan landuse.
Jakka (2022-01-22 13:03:35+00:00): Verbeterd. thx
Lyon-St-Clair (2022-01-23 20:20:45+00:00): Et la rue de Hesperange reste à sens unique sur le bout qui longe le magasin "Model shop" ?
ViTiS57 (2022-01-24 13:38:04+00:00): pour l'instant oui
Lyon-St-Clair (2022-01-24 14:28:20+00:00): D'accord, merci pour la précision, n'étant pas du coin.
porfiriopaiz (2022-04-17 01:11:11+00:00): Hello,

Unless the building has it own name, there is not need to add the string "Edificio" on a building.

Regards,

Porfirio
J-MUC (2022-01-21 21:02:46+00:00): CS comment should have been: Update advertising column
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:43:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Vinber-Pro (2023-12-20 17:12:29+00:00): salut,
c'est vraiment un community_centre : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity=community%20centre?uselang=fr

ou les bureaux d'une association ?

bonne soirée
Kevo (2022-01-26 13:52:09+00:00): Please stop adding "future developments" - the map must only show what is happening.  90% of the construction items you add aren't actually construction but still farm fields.  Please see here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction
"A site which is under active development and construction of a building or structure, including any purposeful alteration to the land or vegetation upon it. Abandoned construction projects and sites should not use this tag. "

Please stop adding theoretical construction or construction that is not taking place, as that's vandalism.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-01 21:37:29+00:00): For info see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5638
Gazer75 (2022-01-22 19:22:03+00:00): How did you find all the solar panels?

I've also noticed that you've misplaced a lot of them because you've completely ignored image perspective. You can't just add the panel on tall buildings right at the the spot in the image if the photo is taken at an angle.
CAI Stabia (2022-01-26 07:00:13+00:00): Ciao, cortesemente ci indichi perchè hai eliminato il nome CAI del sentiero di Abu Tabela (345d)? E' il numero ufficiale del Catasto dei sentieri della Regione Campania
Prot D (2022-02-12 22:03:16+00:00): Ciao, il numero 354a è già nella relazione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4814083 e ho pensato che non fosse necessario metterlo in ogni parte del percorso. E dovrebbe essere 354a, non 345a né 345d, no?
kubahahaha (2023-02-22 22:53:46+00:00): Jesteś pewien że to jest service, a nie path?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/909384749
surveyor54 (2022-01-22 12:14:26+00:00): Bitte Parkplatzwege mir bestehendem Straßennetz verbinden, damit sie für das Routing der Navis benutzt werden können. Fußgänger-  und Autorouting)
puma515 (2022-01-21 22:44:36+00:00): Wo passt das Tag nicht?

    Wenn der Weg noch weiterführt. Dies gilt auch, wenn der weiterführende Weg nur von bestimmten Personen benutzt werden darf. Also selbst wenn der weiterführende Weg zum Beispiel ein Privatweg ist.

Habe entsprechend alle Falschen Tags gelöscht und wo es sinnvoll war auf den Endpukte ein no Exit erstellt
ZLima12 (2022-03-28 02:45:05+00:00): How do you know that the surface of the bridge is concrete?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116450444
o_andras (2022-01-21 23:39:48+00:00): Forgot this too: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=speed_camera
BCNorwich (2022-01-22 08:17:55+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Could you please say what local knowledge you have to justify the status of access of this highway as bicycle=yes and horse=yes? The reason I ask is that the legal status of this highway (from the borough website) is of Public Footpath. Which would normally mean horse riding and cycling are not statutorily allowed, though there could be private or permissive access.

I've added the tags designation=public_footpath, foot=designated and prow_ref=Bisham FP 20

Regards Bernard.
ToniE (2022-01-22 00:19:40+00:00): Servus,

bitte den zugehörigen Route-Master nicht vergessen

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5609381

Gruß
Toni
geo-d (2022-01-22 00:47:27+00:00): Danke, hatte ich nicht auf dem Schirm!