piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mariotomo (2020-08-11 17:40:54+00:00): Jose, please, stop this.  importing kml data files from the AIG (Autoridad Nacional para la Inovación Gubernamental) is not allowed.  the data is clearly declared proprietary, to ESRI and the corresponding national institution, in this case the IGNTG.
moreover, your edits are NOT CLEARLY marked as imports: "Agregando Detalles".  that's definitely not a clear label to what you are doing.
kepivar (2022-08-28 10:55:05+00:00): Restoration by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125428795
Your Village Maps (2022-08-28 18:27:02+00:00): What did you "restore"?
Verdy_p (2020-09-10 09:02:11+00:00): Deux "contributions" et deux abus !

Merci de ne pas mettre n'importe quoi dans OSM, c en'est pas un terrain de jeu ou de promo d'idées personnelles (surtout quand elles sont insultantes ou illégales) !
UT93 (2020-12-04 23:36:17+00:00): Grüsse
Wie kommst du darauf, den Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/287623410 mit einer Adresse zu belegen? Meiner Erhebung nach, hat das Parkhaus keine Adresse, letztere gehört wohl zum östlich davon angeordneten Gebäude.
mariotomo (2020-08-11 17:36:15+00:00): hi.  how can you read the name of the river (is it a river?  not a stream?) from the maxar aerial pictures?
user_5359 (2020-08-11 18:29:29+00:00): Don't overwrite the node you have added!
Patr1k_P (2021-04-17 20:06:14+00:00): zdravim, u toho farskeho namestia  by nebolo lepsie tie adresy a budovy rovno zmazat? Pride mi zbytocne to nechavat otagovane ako removed:building, kedze podla mozaiky to davno neexistuje

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61385964
Frans S (2020-09-01 12:37:01+00:00): HI Lopenik.
A remark. 
I noticed that you mapped objects as a building but I see no shadow which proofs that the object is above groundlevel. It might be something else. 
Please keep an eye on those objects.
Best regards
archie (2020-08-11 08:31:42+00:00): you destroyed (partly) the multipoligon (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5616044). Why?
Hjart (2020-08-11 11:01:28+00:00): Probably because he wasn't familiar with multipolygons. I've reverted this change
andiniki (2020-08-11 19:43:06+00:00): archie, Hjart, I am sorry when I did something wrong. Please check one more time as I modified the forest area today again. 
The reason for my changing the forest area: I walked the path from Ivigtut to Hattesgaard (Café) and found out that the forest area marked on the map does not match with reality.
I apologize when I did something wrong and I appreciate when you can restore it. Please double check with reality (e.g. by walking the path) and correct afterwords.

Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience
DaveF (2023-01-10 01:57:55+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835897345

You created a few place=village polygons around Cambridge. What was the reference/dataset for their boundary layout?
user_5173844 (2023-01-10 09:57:51+00:00): Hi DaveF,

In this and similar changesets I have copied an existing landuse=residential way with a place=* tag
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58821399
into a standalone place=* way (mostly to avoid accidental removal of data).

I do not know where it originates from but since it was bundled with landuse=residential it is unlikely it was based on official data.
Jose Luis Infante (2020-08-12 00:35:42+00:00): Hola,
gràcies per la teva edició.
Et cal fer una modificació a la pista que creua l'A-22. Precisament el tram de la pista que creua hauria de ser un pont (i afegir l'etiqueta layer=1, per indicar que està a un nivell superior a l'autovia).
Salutacions!
Tyrese Wormely (2020-08-10 22:51:53+00:00): That should’ve read “Added in for Chick-fil-A in Columbus, OH across from Easton Town Center.”.
tux67 (2020-08-11 06:15:07+00:00): Hi,
das Objekt gab es schon - siehe CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88413592 und die dort geführte Diskussion.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89219485
tux67 (2020-08-31 06:49:50+00:00): ok, keine Rückmeldung duplikat gelöscht
DiahW IRM-ED (2021-06-16 08:22:38+00:00): Hi, AlejandroAlba.
I deleted this waterbody (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/835902025) based on Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta).

Thank you
AlejandroAlba (2021-07-10 01:07:36+00:00): You shouldn't have deleted it. They are intermittent gaps and do not always appear on available satellite images.
DiahW IRM-ED (2021-07-12 03:35:46+00:00): Thank you AlejandroAlba.

Sorry for my fault. Thanks for the information and giving me advice about this. I will revert to the original condition.

Thank you
DiahW IRM-ED (2021-07-12 03:48:23+00:00): Sorry for inconvenience issue. I've reviewed this area and the data already fixed by you. 
Thanks for your help fixing this issue.

Thank you
ovruni (2020-08-11 02:49:00+00:00): Hola, en esta edición se ha agregado vías con la etiqueta man_made=courtyard, esta etiqueta que todavía se encuentra en etapa de propuesta, ademas esta diseñada para patios de vecindad que se encuentran entre edificios (que no es este caso), tal como se indica en la documentación.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/courtyard
Para colocar una pequeña area circular donde se puede caminar por toda el area se puede usar la etiqueta de vereda con area=yes, pero si solo se camina alrededor del area circular se debe de seguir usando la etiqueta de vereda sin area. Nuevamente, como en los mensajes que le he dejado en los anteriores conjuntos d ecambios, cualquier duda la puede realizar a la comunidad peruana, por el telegram https://telegram.me/osmPe o la lista de correos https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe.
SomeoneElse (2020-08-15 12:39:36+00:00): Hello,
I don't think that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/126598#map=14/42.1444/-87.8165 is quite back to how it should be.  It was definitely broken before your change (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/X4D ) but going back a bit further I think that the original layout was http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/X4E (note how most of Eden's Spur was excluded).
Obviously I've no idea whether the previous layout was "correct", or whether the boundary was changed post import.
Best Regards,
Andy
jumbanho (2020-08-17 12:09:41+00:00): Thanks for the note.  I have now updated the boundary to match the most recent Tiger data, which I don't know if it is correct or not either, but it is authoritative. Many of the boundary members have a source tag of local, but I don't know what that means.

New changeset: 89516909
SomeoneElse (2020-08-18 06:37:05+00:00): Thanks
iandees (2020-08-18 15:51:55+00:00): I thought I'd point out that TIGER is not an authoritative source for town/city boundaries like this. This linework is reflective of a "Census Designated Place", which usually, but not always, follows a city's boundary (if known). CDP's are built by Census as convenient tools for aggregating data, not as an authoritative city boundary dataset.
jumbanho (2020-08-18 16:00:49+00:00): Yes, we're moving on to trying to figure out where the boundaries are. There were a bunch of ways in this relation that I did not delete, but just removed from the relation.  If those are correct, we just need to figure out how to piece the relation together to match the actual boundary.
AntMadeira (2020-08-11 02:29:57+00:00): Olá, dizzystriker.
Bem-vindo ao OSM e obrigado por começares a contribuir para o maior mapa livrre do mundo. :)

Vi que começaste por fazer algumas alterações na zona da Ilha, nomeadamente na classificação de algumas estradas para secundárias.
Chamo a atenção que a classificação de estradas no OSM obedece a um padrão estabelecido para comunidade portuguesa, que podes consultar aqui:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Padronização

Já corrigi as estradas que alteraste, mas qualquer dúvida que tenhas, podes aderir ao canal oficial do Telegram ou, se preferires, contactar-me.
dizzystriker (2020-08-11 15:59:48+00:00): Obrigado pelo esclarecimento! Eu achei que a designação de rua residencial errada pelo menos. Entre terciária e secundária não conhecia bem a distinção mas fico grato pela correção e informação.
AntMadeira (2020-08-12 02:22:54+00:00): Sempre que tiveres dúvidas, não hesites em perguntar. Estamos cá para ajudar, mas também não sabemos tudo.
Se tiveres interesse, aconselho-te a entrar no canal do Telegram, onde a malta discute todos os assuntos relacionados com o OSM.
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos.
naveenpf (2020-09-16 01:57:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89220506
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:13:09+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
Serbian OSM Lint bot (2020-08-23 20:31:56+00:00): Zdravo,
I na ovom changesetu i na changesetu 84968677 si dodavao admin_level i boundary=administrative. Ovo je Beograd gradsko jezgro, i nije zvanicna granica. Revertovao sam izmene ovde: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89821167. Dosta smo o ovome disuktovali ovde: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68288, pa se ukljuci molim te, pre nego sto opet promenis:D Hvala!
Serbian OSM Lint bot (2020-08-23 20:32:37+00:00): Ovo sam pisao sa bot naloga, ovo je moj nalog: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Branko%20Kokanovic :D
johnarupire (2020-08-11 02:21:49+00:00): Hola SAN LUIS - SERENAZGO,
en esta edición hay un error bastante claro, las áreas verdes que mapeaste al rededor del edificio de la Municipalidad de San Luís no es un parque. 
Creo que hay algunos problemas serios con tus ediciones, las que además no tienen nada que ver con los comentarios que agregas en el conjunto de cambios. Por favor, no hagas eso. Si tienes dudas sobre cómo funciona este proyecto ponte en contacto. Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
user_5359 (2020-08-11 03:32:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! P,ease have a look on building https://www.osm.org/way/835926924. The tag building:levels=0 means that the building has no height above ground level.
user_5359 (2021-12-01 10:47:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835935818 What is the meaning of this way (no keys, no member of a relation)
user_6771650 (2020-12-03 21:51:47+00:00): Why did you change Searles Lake to a quarry??
azakh-world (2020-08-15 23:00:27+00:00): Hi.
By setting railway=station onto station buildings you created station duplicates. E.g., way 79508517 and node 7747871285. Please eliminate duplication, taking into account that:
1) station area does not usually coincide with building area. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:railway%3Dstation page provides explicit alert about that. English version contains a complex picture of a railway station and associated features.
2) For that reason german and some other versions of the railway=station wiki page insist on mapping railway stations with nodes only.
Whatever method you choose please remain only one object with railway=station tag. Please refer to http://osm-subway.maps.me/france.html validation page to see errors in Lille.

BR,
Alexey
user_5359 (2020-08-11 18:11:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Menak Vishap (2020-08-25 06:09:06+00:00): Пожалуйста, верните объект leisure=park для Ботанического сада!!! Сад - это не только ООПТ, но и городкой парк, и должен на карте показываться как парк!
Dinamik (2020-08-25 19:43:37+00:00): Из-за технических ограничений нельзя для объекта, которому присвоен тег leisure=nature_reserve, добавить ещё и тег leisure=park. Чисто технически можно написать leisure=nature_reserve;park, но такое тегирование не принято и не поддерживается.
Кстати, Ботанический сад не является ни зоной зелёных насаждений общего пользования, ни местного озеленения.
Rabin Ojha (2020-08-11 04:33:05+00:00): Please do not create new building on top of already created building!!
rab (2020-08-11 09:56:54+00:00): Hello,
i picked up some exsample of your recent changes here. Please review your work and fix the issues.

Not recangular, connected to another building
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835963762

Overlapping, not rectangular:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835963757

Wrong shape and size:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/835967083
trigpoint (2020-08-11 12:07:29+00:00): Did you really use all of these imagery sources, it looks rather odd as Bing streetside is very urbancentric and certainly not available here.
Sources should only include what is actually used.

Cheers Phil
pjij (2020-08-12 06:01:40+00:00): Hi trigpoint,

Thanks for checking into our edits. I have enabled all the imagery to check its availability in the osm and make necessary changes. All the enabled sources are auto populated while saving the edits. Apologies, I have not modified the sources before saving the edits. thanks for the suggestions. Going forward, i will be modifying the sources used accordingly. Always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
pjij
ma-rt-in (2020-08-12 06:49:23+00:00): Hallo,
wenn die B5 eine Kraftfahrstraße ist, dann setzte bitte motorroad=yes, zudem bitte horse/foot/bicycle=no nur setzten wenn tatsächlich beschildert.
Siehe dazu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
vg
schueszel (2020-08-12 10:37:52+00:00): Hallo und danke für die Hinweise. Motorroad=yes ist gesetzt und die Hinweise horse/foot/bycicle=no gelöscht.
vg
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
abakus_uploader (2020-08-11 22:31:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:35:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89230047
OddlyAngled (2021-03-30 20:15:15+00:00): is it possible to cut down the size of this? not everywhere in Sequoia NP is filled with trees
Russ McD (2023-01-24 02:38:28+00:00): I wish you would be more organised in your edits - you are drawing building outlines on top of existing ones !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
tastrax (2020-09-08 23:56:09+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Lokai (2020-08-11 08:37:20+00:00): Hallo, 35% Steigung, is das nicht zuviel?

Gruß

W.
schwinginsfeld (2020-08-11 09:04:19+00:00): Du hast recht, ich habe auf 25% reduziert
Parzelle13 (2020-08-11 14:26:45+00:00): Bei 248 m Strecke(Luftlinie) und 26 m Höhendifferenz sind das allerdings nur 10.5% Steigung
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:35:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89234323
martien-176 (2020-09-08 15:32:42+00:00): I noticed that you mapped buildings on top of existing ones. This is probably due to an ID Editor feature that fools many other mappers too.
 
 I quote from the instructions:
 ¨Be aware that iD editor hides OSM features from view to enhance performance. There is a blue notice that appears at the bottom of iD Editor indicating whether OSM features are being hidden. Zoom in until no features are hidden before editing. This will ensure you are not duplicating existing mapping.¨
 
 So please be cautious of this in your mappings.
 
 Regards and please keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89234382
marczoutendijk (2024-03-24 10:14:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836005230
service=]
What do you mean with that?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Arthtoach (2024-03-24 11:36:35+00:00): Looks like a mistake, I've removed the tag.
Pierre K (2020-08-11 09:46:52+00:00): Sluippaden zijn illegaal aangelegde paden. Om een pad aan te leggen in een bos is een vergunning nodig van ANB, in sommige gevallen ook een stedebouwkundige vergunning. Aanleg van een pad gaat gepaard met wijziging van vegetatie. Voor dit bos is de opmaak van een beheeplan opgestart. Als er al nieuwe paden moeten bijkomen (bijvoorbeeld om functionele redenen: verbinding met ander padennetwerk) dan kan dat best binnen het beheerplan opgenomen worden. Zomaar in het wilde weg op iemands anders eigendom een pad aanleggen zonder enig overleg, kan niet.
joost schouppe (2020-08-11 10:05:21+00:00): Bedankt; da's duidelijker. Bij OpenStreetMap brengen we echter de realiteit in beeld zoals die werkelijk bestaat, niet hoe die "zou moeten bestaan". Op basis van wat ik begrepen heb over de situatie, zijn de paden op de linkeroever op privé terrein maar door de eigenaars zelf aangelegd (daarom access=permissive). De paden op rechteroever zijn dan in principe illegaal, en kunnen dan best een access=no krijgen. Het noordelijke van de twee paadjes is overigens al een hele tijd in gebruik, al was het tot vorig jaar wat vager. Overigens zijn er nog wel een aantal paden bijgekomen of meer ingesleten geraakt de laatste tijd. Dit bijvoorbeeld is vrij recent ontstaan: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/673210963/history . Daar heeft iemand al aan toegevoegd dat je er niet mag fietsen - wat allicht correct is, maar niet expliciet aangeduid. Een beheersplan met "community buy-in" en meer signalisatie zou inderdaad niet slecht zijn!
Aleksa M (2020-08-11 10:34:02+00:00): Oznaka tourism=apartment se koristi isključivo za pojedinačne turističke apartmane, a ne za stambenu zgradu. Za stambenu zgradu se koristi oznaka building=apartment. Već drugi put pogrešno upotrebljavaš oznaku tourism=apartment.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-08-11 07:30:35+00:00): (przynajmniej według notki)
czubi (2020-08-15 08:49:53+00:00): Bitte highways und landuse nicht miteinander verkleben!
Ist es sinnvoll das die Einsatzstelle und der Weg mitten im Wasser liegen oder wäre es nicht besser am Ufer aufgehoben?
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:35:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89235805
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:35:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89236007
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:35:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89236031
Jose Luis Infante (2020-08-12 00:28:12+00:00): Hola,
mira de revisar l'edició. Per un mirador es pot fer servir l'etiqueta tourism=viewpoint, amb un nom més adient.
Salutacions!
JLZIMMERMANN (2023-10-19 11:57:56+00:00): Bonjour,
Je suis en train d'affiner le calage des emprise d'occupation des sols.
C'est pour cela que je rend non jointives des emprises résidentielles ou naturelles ayant des frontières de natures différentes : cours d'eau, voirie, chemin de fer...
Belle journée
Jean-Louis
Stalker61 (2020-08-11 16:16:10+00:00): Пожалуйста не делайте больше подобных изменений
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
Cristoffs (2021-03-06 15:54:45+00:00): Dodałeś błędnie do obszaru tartaku oznaczenie budynku. Taki teren oznacza się https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:industrial%3Dsawmill Poprawiłem
friedrice428 (2021-03-06 18:20:21+00:00): Tak, dzięki wielkie. Teraz to już bym inaczej to oznaczył.
Kovoschiz (2020-08-11 11:42:59+00:00): 1. Sidewalk should follow what's constructed, not a desire path. You should modify the parking area instead. 
2. Platforms doesn't describe their connection or relationship to the train station. Other objects are used. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89249006
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89237717
Kovoschiz (2020-08-11 11:41:08+00:00): Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89237717
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89237833
Kovoschiz (2020-08-11 11:43:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89249006
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89237833
Kovoschiz (2020-08-11 11:36:15+00:00): Please don't upload test or unfinished objects. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89248744
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89237938