piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-22 04:50:32+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJCZWdpbl9Qb2ludCI6WzAsMzQ4LjQ4OF19&location=33.652914%2C-86.425525%2C17.13&style=ROUTE_NAME
user_17724595 (2022-11-25 20:14:22+00:00): .
Glassman (2022-11-24 01:07:25+00:00): #TIP: Instead of deleting and then adding another track, just update the tags and alignment. That saves the history of an object.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129221348
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-22 05:41:53+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJCZWdpbl9Qb2ludCI6WzAsMzQ4LjQ4OF19&location=39.782825%2C-76.699909%2C15.85&style=ROUTE_NAME
gscholz (2022-12-31 09:39:11+00:00): Hi Tashipem,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "" and "Nanong":

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12174904/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12174902#map=15/27.1304/91.4630

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129221821

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
PT-53 (2022-11-27 11:16:13+00:00): Hallo,  C7wE2By8UrTaK
Du hast an diesem Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40758147/history
das Merkmal
- note=Die Straße ist bis ca. Dez. 2022 wg. Bauarbeiten gesperrt.
gelöscht, die Sperren
- motor_vehicle=no
und
- horse=no 
aber belassen.
Das war wohl ein Versehen, oder?
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Frans S (2022-11-22 13:04:30+00:00): Hello. I reviewed these mappings as well.
The same issues. Connected highways to hedges.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129222011
chris66 (2026-06-12 08:42:14+00:00): layer -14 ist ein bisschen komisch :-)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13382507
chris66 (2026-06-12 08:50:10+00:00): sorry, ist gar nicht von dir..... :-)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5340851
NorthCrab (2022-11-22 14:30:00+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikacje.

dojazd pożarowy brzmi bardziej jak emergency=designated niż =yes (jest to wyraźne dostosowanie drogi).

Więcej informacji:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=yes
NorthCrab (2022-11-22 14:30:31+00:00): +
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddesignated
emtiwi (2022-11-22 16:36:26+00:00): Dzięki za sprawdzenie. Poprawie to.
opendcc (2022-11-22 12:41:21+00:00): Hallo,

landuse=commerial ist nicht korrekt. Laut Darstellung der Fa. auf der Webseite: Auf dem 40.000 m2 großen Betriebsgelände werden die meisten unserer eigenen TRIUSO Erzeugnisse produziert. landuse=industrial wäre korrekt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:18:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Kovoschiz (2022-11-22 07:13:58+00:00): This is already included in `tunnel:name=`. It is not a major tunnel that qualifies as commonly known in `name=`. Similar to Airport Tn on Tung Wing Rd.
user_17724595 (2022-11-25 20:13:33+00:00): .
user_17724595 (2022-11-25 20:13:50+00:00): .
mcliquid (2022-11-23 09:25:26+00:00): Hi, das TOP sollte nicht in der Adresse hinterlegt werden. Eine Adresse ist einem Gebäude zugeordnet, nicht einer Wohnung / Einheit.
addr:housenumber wäre somit 3-5
addr:street wäre Sonnenweg
Das TOP könntest du mit "addr:unit" direkt am Eingang angeben (addr:unit=5), aber das ist in Österreich nicht üblich.
mcliquid (2022-11-23 09:36:20+00:00): Ich habe das mal soweit ergänzt, sodass du gerne weiter optimieren kannst. Vor allem auch die Gebäude im Osten die noch komplett gefehlt haben.
ikopanjirukmana (2022-12-05 08:46:11+00:00): Hi!
Glassman (2022-11-24 01:12:34+00:00): I'm confused by the area tagged a Trials Bike Area and as bare rock. From imagery it looks like a clearcut area. Wouldn't the entire area be a Trials Bike area?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129223153
Frans S (2022-11-22 12:52:22+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
Tagging of highways and residential areas
Please check your knowledge of how to map highways and residential areas.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines


https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/

Best regards

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129223292
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 05:59:58+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164880087
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 06:54:58+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164842492
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 06:18:38+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164752470
Frans S (2022-11-22 12:54:48+00:00): Hello. 
A remark.
When you are mapping for HOTOSM buildings always need to be tagged as building=yes.
Please don't oversize this building as well.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129224536
Frans S (2022-11-22 11:29:05+00:00): Hello again. I also reviewed your mappings here.
Issues:
Buildings connected to highways.(serious errors)
Buildings not squared and buildings connected with their nodes to each other.
You also ignored the warnings on the issue triangle
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129224743
user_3022894 (2022-11-22 10:11:34+00:00): Hi Jörg,

sorry, ganz kurz, kleiner Hinweis:
Wenn es sich um eine klassische Spielhalle mit [hauptsächlich] Automatenspiel handelt, ist das Tag "leisure=adult_gaming_centre" noch etwas genauer als amenity=gambling.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dadult_gaming_centre

Das Tag ist meine ich erst ein paar Jahre alt. Hab gesehen, viele Spielhallen sind hier und da glaube ich auch nich als Casino (amenity=casino) getaggt, was oft aus der Zeit stammt, als es "leisure=adult_gaming_centre" noch nicht gab. 

Allerdings Achtung:
Im vorliegenden Fall wsr das Problem offenbar, dass [...]centre im anderen Englisch als "center" geschrieben wurde. Vermutlich wurde es daher auch vom Editor nicht als Spielhalle erkannt.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
eggie (2022-11-22 07:53:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  De Dieze is goed gegaan, maar de A Schweizerschool staat al in OSM op het vlak zelf getagd. Dus die info heb ik weer verwijderd.
Op welk nummer hoort de AS school?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-11-22 08:03:48+00:00): 
Nr 11 is volgens de website het juiste adres. Alles klopt hier.
tastrax (2022-11-26 04:49:23+00:00): Hi Toodletoon - you appear to have deleted heaps of retail buildings and then redrawn as buildings=yes whilst at the same time combining some of the old building footprints. This is not the way it should be done. When you delete an object all its history is lost. You should instead edit existing objects, even if this takes longer to accomplish. You also seem to have bulk moved a lot of objects - was this intentional and how did you determine the correct alignment between the different imageries? I assume you are a local to Ulverstone?
Toddletoon (2022-11-29 08:22:10+00:00): I suppose editing existing details would be ideal. I probably forgot to set buildings to retail. I did intend to move objects. I tend to use a mix of imagery and GPS tracks.
eggie (2022-11-22 07:56:57+00:00): Fawaz... Weet je zeker dat sport=swimming hier de juiste tag is?

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129225380

Wellicht de regel sport=swimming verwijderen?

MVG
eggie
Warin61 (2022-11-23 05:15:53+00:00): Hi
The multipoygon relation  	14920744 is in error. The outer ways cannot share segments. 

I note that the railway area is not mapped at either side. Might be simplest to delete it.
Robuster (2022-11-23 05:30:09+00:00): Yeah, I had noticed that, and will make an effort in future to just delete the offending area.

Corrected the area and just extended it from the other side of the bridge.
Warin61 (2022-11-23 10:04:28+00:00): No reason to use a relation for these kind of things, just tag each landuse and be done. 
If they had a common thing like a name then that would be a different case, if it had no holes in it then a simple single way would be enough, no need for a relation?

Good luck.
Robuster (2022-11-23 23:35:17+00:00): Thanks, I hadn't created the relation, it was modified as I moved it to correct the foot path location and buildings.

But noted for future.
dgitto (2022-12-15 16:13:48+00:00): Hi, thank you for editing here. But to be precise, that building is not a "building=hotel" (was builded in 19th century, probably)
HolloWorld (2022-12-18 18:18:27+00:00): 你好！謝謝你的編緝，橋梁的名稱應填在bridge:name上。
另外編緝集(changeset)的名稱可為簡短的的描述方便其他編緝者參考；如：「道路(修改)，建築物(增加資訊)」等。
你也可以在社群上(https://t.me/osmchina)提問不同問題，以能提供一致的地圖資料。
HolloWorld (2022-12-18 19:02:31+00:00): 另外有許多地方的線(way)差少許才連接到其他道路、
道路等級標籤為錯誤等級、
公交站點在道路上：應在站牌位置，路上的為stop_position、
標籤(tag)不符合實際意思：編緝器上的翻譯或文字不一定為實際意思
等等

有經驗的編緝者也有時會搞不清，你可以上wiki査看定義或到社群上提問問題
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 06:54:59+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164842492
martinst (2022-11-23 09:19:20+00:00): Da der Pfad noch weitergeht wäre es  sinnvoll fixme=continue zu ergänzen, oder?
habi (2022-11-28 21:30:38+00:00): Der Pfad geht aus meiner Sicht weder auf der Strava Heatmap noch im Geländemodell irgendwo sichtbar durch.
srbrook (2022-11-22 22:07:04+00:00): Source for original underground cable was https://gb-power.russss.dev/#19/51.95380/-2.57050 which shows cable crossing but without node at self intersection. Cable is quite likely to cross without a join which otherwise would leave a pointless loop. However there is no way of knowing what is actually underground.
BCNorwich (2022-11-23 07:25:03+00:00): Hi, The cable was joined at the crossover, I've unjoined it and tried to remove the self-intersection. 
Regards Bernard.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 05:59:59+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164880087
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 06:18:39+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164752470
Nearby0051 (2022-11-22 20:41:22+00:00): Moin,
Stimmt denn dann die Position auf der Karte noch?
user_507893 (2022-11-23 21:07:36+00:00): Der Knoten wurde an die angegebene Adresse verschoben
NorthCrab (2022-11-22 14:39:12+00:00): Witaj,

Jesteś pewny, że https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116215030/history nie jest przejezdne dla pojazdów motorowych (motor_vehicle=no)?

Na zdjęciach orto widać jest 2 oddzielne ślady: https://i.imgur.com/3tF0yg1.png

Pozdrawiam
Last_Viking (2022-11-22 14:58:22+00:00): Witaj,

jest to droga polna, auta osobowe raczej nie powinny tamtędy jeździć. Problem był taki, że tej drogi w ogóle nie było na mapie, przez co nie można było wyznaczyć trasy np. na rower. Dlatego ją dodałem.

Pozdrawiam
NorthCrab (2022-11-22 15:02:19+00:00): Pojazdy motorowe to grupa większa od aut osobowych (pojazdy terenowe, traktory itp.).

To aplikacja decyduje czy uznać drogę za optymalną. Najlepszym sposobem na unikanie nawigowania aut osobowych to:
1. ustawianie typu highway= (track jest bardzo dobrym wyborem)
2. ustawianie surface= (ground też jest OK)
3. opcjonalnie tracktype= (grade5 to jedna najniższa oficjalna jakość drogi).

Dlatego też uważam że należy usunąć motor_vehicle=no (pozostałe informacje przekazują wystarczająco dużo informacji).
NorthCrab (2022-11-22 15:03:53+00:00): Dodam jeszcze że oznaczenie =no jest równorzędne z zakazem wjazdu (w świetle prawa). Dlatego też używanie =no dla "nie powinno nawigować" jest błędem.

Więcej informacji:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor%20vehicle
Last_Viking (2022-11-22 15:54:36+00:00): Dziękuję, już poprawiłem na motor_vehicle=yes.

Zamierzam nanieść kilka dróg w okolicy, ponieważ dużo wyznaczam tras i ich po prostu brakuje.

Pozdrawiam.
NorthCrab (2022-11-22 16:16:48+00:00): Git, na przyszłość te 4 tagi na 99% są tutaj zbędne (https://i.imgur.com/5YpETgt.png), dodanie ich nie jest błędem ale więcej pracy wkładasz bez potrzeby. Większość takich dróżek w Polsce to max. kombinacja pozostałych 3 tagów (highway, surface, tracktype).
Last_Viking (2022-11-23 06:54:51+00:00): Dziękuję za rady. 
A po jakim czasie zmiany będą widoczne? Nadal nie mogę wyznaczyć trasy tą drogą, nawet pieszo.
NorthCrab (2022-11-23 13:00:25+00:00): Zależy od aplikacji z jakiej korzystasz. Na stronie OpenStreetMap to nawet już po 5 minutach (CTRL+F5). OsmAnd jak masz live updates to po kilku godzinach. OsmAnd bez live updates po około miesiącu. Mapy.cz chyba do 3 miesięcy. Wszystko to kwestia czasu aż producent aplikacji zsynchronizuje dane z OSM.
Last_Viking (2022-11-23 13:11:05+00:00): Coś źle ustawiłem, skoro nadal nie można nawigować po tej drodze?

https://i.imgur.com/yoxYFQN.jpg
NorthCrab (2022-11-23 14:16:37+00:00): A nawigacja na OpenStreetMap to do około tygodnia. Miałem na myśli wyświetlanie. Tam są 2 silniki do wyboru, GraphHopper oraz OSRM. OSRM chyba trochę częściej się odświeża.
NorthCrab (2022-11-23 14:17:58+00:00): Jak przybliżysz to możesz zobaczyć że linia nawigacji nie zgadza się do końca z tym co jest wyświetlane, oznacza to że nadal ma stare dane.

https://i.imgur.com/8E5pyVR.png
Last_Viking (2022-11-23 14:20:18+00:00): Dzięki! :)
silversurfer83 (2022-11-23 16:04:34+00:00): Warum hast du dieses Gebäude auf den Weg geschoben?

(du darfst auf Kommentare übrigens gerne antworten. Du hast auch von zwei anderen Mappern schon Kommentare bekommen, auf die du zwar mit Änderungen aber nicht mit text reagiert hast)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129228142
voltairovicz (2022-11-22 16:25:03+00:00): Z tego artykułu wynika, iż remont był przeprowadzony tylko i wyłącznie na długości 3 km. Wątpię by było zamknięte całe kilkanaście km tejże drogi. Chodziło pewnie o drogę powiatową Przytyk Kożuchow i jej fragment. Ponadto jeszcze we wrześniu jechałem do Radzanowa od przytyka i budowa drogi za Studzienicami nie była przeprowadzana a artykuł mówi o końcu remontu za miesiąc. Także wygląda na to, że zakres tej edycji był na wyrost
NorthCrab (2022-11-22 14:36:03+00:00): Witaj, dlaczego z tego budynku usunąłeś adres?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435909241/history
->
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116239016/history

Jeśli tego budynku tam nie ma to usuń także jego obrys. Chociaż jeśli nadal widać go na zdjęciach orto to proponuję skorzystać z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Jeśli budynek nadal istnieje, proszę przywróć adres.
N8ZPZBVGQH (2022-11-22 08:58:08+00:00): Thanks
NorthCrab (2022-11-22 14:41:17+00:00): Witaj, skąd informacja że ten obiekt nazywa się "19 Kwietnia"?
https://i.imgur.com/rPJN262.png

Pozdrawiam
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
flohoff (2022-11-29 23:06:19+00:00): Moin,
bitte keine abgerissenen Gebäude entfernen.

Die werden umgetagged auf razed:building=yes oder so. Sonsten trägt der nächste die vom Luftbild wieder ein.

Und wenn sich da eine Baustelle/Neubau ergibt macht es sinn dort auch gleich ein landuse=brownfield oder landuse=construction drauf zu machen aus dem Gründstück.

Hier ist wieder Blick in das ALKIS sinnvoll weil da die Grundstücksgrenzen auch drin sind - damit hat man ein Gefühl wie groß das wird.

Und bei den überlappenden Landuses dann entweder sauber ausschneiden oder mit Multipolygonen arbeiten.

Flo
archie (2022-11-22 09:39:28+00:00): Vänligen observera att förskoletaggen redan finns på området, så som taggningen skall vara. Byggnaden är taggad - som sig bör - med kindergarten.
user_2234817 (2022-11-22 12:59:09+00:00): Meine letzte Nachricht ist wohl irgendwo hängen geblieben. 
Habe aus Gesprächen mit?Gartennachbarn erfahren, dass diese Grundstück mit 3 Gärten zur Gartensparte ”Elbfrieden” gehören.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:26:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2022-11-22 10:21:27+00:00): Dag volgspot.. 
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Het gebied van je edits is zo groot geworden omdat je de jachtstellage hebt vastgeplakt aan de grens van een natura 2000 gebied.
Ik heb 'm even losgekoppeld. 

MVG
eggie
lefuturiste (2023-09-11 12:03:14+00:00): Why would you need that?
addr:city, addr:country, addr:postcode are useless in this case, it's already on the administrative boundary
osmdees (2023-09-11 12:08:50+00:00): Thx for the question. That's why I deleted it. "Geöscht" is a typo, it should be "gelöscht" or "deleted"
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-10-06 02:38:43+00:00): não é track, até pq ficaram várias vias unclassified conectadas a ela. ficou bem estranho. voltei ao que tava antes. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891872446/history
kurisubrooks (2022-11-23 03:12:44+00:00): Hi there, do you have a source for the name of this mock-station? Thanks.
AU_SPM (2022-11-23 07:06:01+00:00): I have been there and seen it with my own eyes. 
 
I have placed a photo of the Station sign on Google Maps

https://goo.gl/maps/JkHrU648oibPHqSeA
kurisubrooks (2022-11-23 07:22:09+00:00): Awesome, thanks for confirming.

Just to let you know, when you submit your changesets, there's a box underneath where you write your comment/message where you can specify what sources you used for the data you've just added/changed.

We recommend filling this out every time. Just a simple "Survey" or "Bing" will do, which helps let other mappers know that the data doesn't come from a malicious source.

Thanks again,
Chris.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:13:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
NorthCrab (2022-11-22 14:55:38+00:00): Witaj, jeśli muzeum zajmuje cały budynek to dane o muzeum powinny być przypięte do budynku. Jeśli dokładna lokalizacja nie jest znana lub gdy w danym budynku znajduje się kilka punktów usługowych, oznaczamy je jako punkt. W tym przypadku oznaczenie przy pomocy punktu i budynku jest błędem.

Pozdrawiam
NorthCrab (2022-11-25 22:50:33+00:00): Poprawiłem:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129384919
gscholz (2022-12-12 08:29:11+00:00): Hi Grannymeg,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=80.42722&lat=6.65546&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129230565

Can you please fix this?

You may like to educate yourself about how to edit multipolygon relations:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-12-18 07:22:37+00:00): Hi Grannymeg, 
this errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
dcapillae (2022-11-22 09:52:36+00:00): Este conjunto de cambios debió haberse subido con la cuenta de usuario dedicada dcapillae_buildings-import (error mío, lo siento).
maraf24 (2023-01-17 19:54:25+00:00): turn:lanes!
Poza tym restrykcja z way jako via słaba działa.
habi (2022-11-22 09:58:39+00:00): Weiherstrasse, nicht Wehierstrasse :)
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 06:18:40+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164752470
Frans S (2022-11-22 11:34:56+00:00): Hello. Also, this changeset has been reviewed.
Here you connected a road to a hedge, which is an error (GSM driven navigation systems cannot handle this. A road never went through hedges or buildings.)
You also did not map the buildings, hamlets which are also required to map.

Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129231221
eggie (2022-11-22 10:25:09+00:00): Marc... Lijkt me prima zo.

Groet
eggie
Frans S (2022-11-22 11:40:02+00:00): Hello Again.
Here you mapped a few buildings within a small community (small hamlet) as a village.
In the instructions is clearly described how to map these objects.
I corrected them
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129231526
eggie (2022-11-25 10:27:38+00:00): stellage losgemaakt van administratieve grens