piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gino-52 (2016-12-02 20:24:03+00:00): Hmmm, das mit der Rückfahrt verstehe ich jetzt nicht.
Du hast ja public_transport:version=2 angegeben.
Damit muss es für jede Richtung und jede Variante eine separate Relation geben.
Aber deine Relation ist nicht nach public_transport:version=2 gemappt.
Dabei müssen zuerst die Haltestellen kommen.
Wenn es eine Stopposition gibt, diese zuerst, dann die Plattform. Anschließend die Straßensegmente in der Reihenfolge in der der Bus fährt.
Ausserdem fehlt bei dir noch der Tag route=bus in der Relation.
Die Klammern um ref=(FB-40) stelle ich auch mal in Frage.
Schau die mal eine Relation z.B. FB-42... an.
Bei den Straßensegmenten sieht man dann rechts auch eine durchgehende Linie, wenn alles ok ist.
Falls Du noch Fragen hast - gerne...
Gruß Gino
scg1176 (2016-12-03 17:02:05+00:00): Ja, das stimmt alles. Aber mir ist leider RealLife dazwischen gekommen. Ich werde es ergänzen, wenn ich dazu komme... Eine Richtung hat mich 30min Zeit gekostet. Die hatte ich für die Rückfahrt nicht. Außerdem habe ich erstmal nur die Route gesetzt, damit die Linie erfasst wird. Der Rest wird noch aufwändiger und dazu braucht man Zeit. Und als 3.: Ich habe nichts gegen konstruktive Kritik, aber ich werde mich nicht für jede Kleinigkeit rechtfertigen, weil sie nicht vollständig irgendeinem Regelwerk entspricht oder weil jemand das Regelwerk unter dem Kissen liegen hat. Genaues mappen ist tierisch aufwändig. Ich mache es fertig, wenn ich dazu komme (siehe dazu Satz 2)... Bitte erst recherchieren und dann meckern... Die Linie ist nagelneu (ab Fpl 2017)... Danke für dein Verständnis.
PS: Ich mache das seit 5 Jahren und weiß, wie PTv2 geht...
PPS: So, ich hoffe, einiges ist geklärt. Ich habe keine Lust auf so ein Theater. Dazu macht mir das alles zu viel Spaß!
Viel Spaß noch beim mappen
Gino-52 (2016-12-04 11:41:23+00:00): Na jetzt beruhige Dich erst mal wieder.
So wie die Route aussah ist das kein Theater sondern gut gemeinte Hilfe.
Eine einfache note "Route noch in Arbeit" hätte Klarheit geschafft.
Ausserdem, um auf den Ausgangspunkt zurückzukommen, müsstest Du als "erfahrerner Tagger" wissen, dass man bei Aufteilung von Objekten die betreffenden Relationen überprüfen muss. Zumal JOSM einem darauf hinweist.
Weiterhin entspanntes Taggen
:-))
joost schouppe (2016-11-29 18:30:53+00:00): Ik heb de openingsuren van je winkel aangepast. Hier is een (ietwat complexe) syntax voor, zodat deze machine readable zou zijn. Meer info hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Daarnaast ook de website toegevoegd. Ik heb ook even gezocht op de wiki naar een specifieke categorie (tag in OpenStreetMap taal) voor borstvoedingswinkels, maar niet direct iets gevonden... Dit kan nog ontwikkeld worden, moest je je geroepen voelen, dan kan je zelf een voorstel doen :)
Carnildo (2016-11-28 23:05:07+00:00): I repeat: is there a reason why you do not consider these roads to be tertiary?
rashaurl (2016-11-29 08:04:57+00:00): Уважаемый Адильбек, не нужно рисовать здания поверх существующих. Если вы хотите добавить название на казахском языке используйте тег name:kk = имя
opendcc (2017-05-04 20:45:09+00:00): Diese Kiesgrube ist mittlerweile verfüllt. Landuse farmland.

Servus Wolfgang
HCX Biker (2017-05-05 16:30:04+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang,
danke für den Tip, aber daß kann nur ein Ortskundiger wissen! (Komme aus der Gegend von Augsburg)

Gruß Martin
opendcc (2017-05-05 16:45:20+00:00): Hallo Martin,

bin da am Mittwoch vorbei geradelt. Und wenn Du in JOSM bayern als Hintergrund nimmst, siehst Du es auch. Oben in Stauden hat sich auch was getan, das ganze Gerümpel ist nicht mehr da ...
muralito (2016-11-29 13:56:01+00:00): "Farmacia" is not part of the name, is the type of element, amenity=pharmacy
muralito (2016-11-29 14:03:03+00:00): Funsa is a brand, not the name of the shop.
Alexander-II (2016-12-18 14:19:33+00:00): А все-таки про доступ к внутреннем двору по Большой Пироговской 27. Вы уверены, что туда есть публичный доступ? Я как-то той зимой вечером сунулся, и охранник на проходной не дал пройти транзитно через их территорию. Что попахивает private.
Erelen (2016-12-18 18:24:48+00:00): И правда. Погорячился.
Исправил в 44497734.
DenisJu (2017-02-11 18:21:54+00:00): Anisa, kemi dy "amenity=fuel"! Cili është i sakti? Apo vlejnë të dy?
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4527220490#map=19/41.33410/19.80561
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4455254169
AnisKoutsi (2017-02-14 14:18:02+00:00): Denis, besoj gabimisht jane bere dy editime amenity=fuel te njejta, (te dy me te dhena te sakta). Gjithsesi fshiva njerin nga editimet.
Paksa Tamás (2016-11-29 00:15:20+00:00): Térinformatika _ BW6VNW
user_5359 (2016-12-04 06:10:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
daherk2 (2019-04-07 01:20:04+00:00): POI desatualizado.
Mercado fechou em Out. de 2018.
smaprs (2016-11-29 10:23:19+00:00): Is this tagging change world wide defined and accepted?
Olyon (2016-11-29 23:58:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dplant
with power=plant plant:output:electricity=* and with power=generator generator:output:electricity=*
norcross (2018-08-23 13:43:41+00:00): It seems that Olyon hasn't checked the mapping intention at every site. For example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3125015/history he changed the solar farm to power=plant, which is against the Wiki (and not getting rendered!). So IMHO this fits into the definition of an mechanical edit.
Olyon (2018-08-26 08:09:46+00:00): it isn't a mechanical edit.
For your exemple, a solar farm is a power station so the tag is power=plant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dplant
power=generator is for every solar photovoltaic panel of the site.
It is in the wiki!
For the rendered, we do not tag for the rendering. add landuse=industrial if you want, and the rendering will be better.
cadsauxk (2016-12-02 11:35:46+00:00): Oi Vitor, porque você apagou vias que eu inseri? Essas inserções são oriundas de pesquisa no local, com muita informação inserida que agora se perdeu.
santamariense (2016-12-02 13:28:43+00:00): Essa semana eu presenciei um ser retirando rótulos. Eu não sei o que leva a fazer isso. Mas esse não é o caso do Vítor que é veterano.
Eu fiz a seguinte análise:
1 - No JOSM, fui em Arquivo > Retornar objetos apagados. Desmarquei separar camadas e colei a lista de objetos apagados (w439600913,w439600860,w229354842,w229348301,w229348204,n2379650920,n2379601642,n2379601584,n2379601573,n2379601558,n2379601554,n2379601456,n2379601381,n2379601367,n2379601243,n2315412394,n2315412387,n2315412386,n2315412378). E então retornar objetos apagados.
2 - Criei nova camada (Arquivo > Nova Camada). Nessa outra camada eu fui em cima das linhas apagadas e botei para baixar os dados (Arquivo > Baixar do OSM)
3 - Como as ruas ainda estão lá, cheguei a conclusão que o Vítor não deletou dados de fato. O que ele fez foi unir caminhos, e é claro que quando se une um caminho a outro, um constará como modificado, e outro como deletado.
Veja este exemplo (que eu suponho que tenha ocorrido): Esta rua estava em formato de L (http://i.imgur.com/3nZJB40.png). O Vítor por certo quebrou ela na esquina (agora são duas ways), e então uniu uma destas partes a continuação correta da rua (transformando duas em uma - http://i.imgur.com/ifssTnU.png).
cadsauxk (2016-12-02 13:36:59+00:00): Hum, verdade, tinha esquecido disto. Quando você junta duas vias na prática uma delas fica obsoleta e acaba sendo apgada. O difícil de analisar estes changesets é que a gente não vê isto claramente, só vê que houve uma deleção.
obrigado
Vítor Dias (2016-12-02 13:50:11+00:00): Caras, que susto! Acordei com os e-mails alertando de mensagens no meu changeset e quebrei a cabeça pensando no que eu poderia ter excluído porque eu não lembrava, rs... Obrigado pelos esclarecimentos, santamariense!

A propósito, o que fiz foi dar nome a várias vias de Brumadinho de acordo com leis que encontrei no site da Câmara Municipal. Inclusive compilei o que achei num único PDF, se algum de vocês quiser é só pedir que mando pelo telegram.

Abraços!
cadsauxk (2016-12-02 14:06:04+00:00): OK, desculpa ter ficado meio exasperado com a coisa. Seria interessante se o histórico tiver um "merged" ou algo assim. Pessoalmente minha tendência não é de ajuntar vias se elas estavam separadas, por isto não vejo muito disto. A razão é que depois elas tendem a ser separadas novamente por várias razões, seja porque partes são distintas ou pertencem a relações de rota diferentes etc.
abraço
santamariense (2016-12-02 14:29:36+00:00): Eu gosto de ver as modificações pelo "achavi": https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44023483 . Qualquer changset que vocês queiram analisar, é só mudar o id dela no link. Bons mapeamentos a todos. abç
piligab (2016-11-29 15:35:25+00:00): Hi Belinda.

Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added a point of interes which already exists, in specific is the school St. Paul's https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357410517, can you confirm which is the right position of this school?
julcnx (2026-06-16 04:02:35+00:00): Hi, some of the ways tagged `surface=clay` in this changeset appear to be laterite roads. `surface=laterite` was approved on 2026-06-15 and describes this surface more precisely. Would you be comfortable retagging? Happy to do it if you prefer. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
MCDA (2016-11-29 19:10:01+00:00): What is this correction and why is it a worldwide edit?  Can you please direct me to the discussion of what this mass edit is about and why its needed.
Olyon (2016-11-30 00:08:27+00:00): sorry. It is small change on many elements to correspond to the correct way to write the values for plant: output:electricity=* and generator:output:electricity=*.
A space between number and unit and uppercase or lowercase for units as shown here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:plant:output.
I also add information on nuclear power plant in Japan
gileri (2016-12-02 15:46:03+00:00): J'ai un peu galéré mais j'ai pu refactor les opening_hours, c'est plus lisible comme ça je trouve :

http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Tu-Th%2018%3A00-01%3A00%2C%20Fr-Sa%2018%3A00-02%3A00&DATE=1480693380000&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0
Harlan Rodrigo (2016-12-01 15:24:47+00:00): Olá colegas,

Gostaria de informá-las que o polígono do Mercadinho Rodeio encontram-se no local errado. Tanto o tamanho quanto a localização estão errados. Se vocês puderem consertar vai ser ótimo. Além disso, a tag mais correta é a Loja de Conveniência para Mercadinho. Obrigado pelo mapeamento de vocês! Sugiro vocês a procurarem mais informações com os grupos do OpenStreetMap do Brasil no Telegram que a galera ajuda bastante na orientação dos mapeamentos.
user_5359 (2016-11-29 20:56:23+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
pbUJb (2018-08-16 06:18:26+00:00): Зачем переименовал улицу? Внимательнее!
Zverik (2016-12-02 09:44:06+00:00): Hi,
You've broke some coastlines in this changeset (ways with natural=coastline tags). I am fixing these now. They are very important for the map, please be careful next time.
Sosha1996 (2019-04-24 13:56:30+00:00): im sorry and thanks.
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-03 22:15:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44147307 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of motorcycle parking locations from Bundesverband der Motorradfahrer. See discussion of changeset 44071123 for details.
user_870861 (2016-11-30 19:55:56+00:00): hi,
be carrefull : you're uploading the same buildings several times (from 2 to 17 times !)
user_870861 (2016-11-30 20:13:54+00:00): it's now fixed on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44068938
issues at http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/done?source=12124&item=0&class=2
felipeeugenio (2018-03-25 15:12:28+00:00): Hola Juan Pablo. Que tal?
Eres mi ultima esperanza para no borrar este puente (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144177463)
Según todo lo que he revisado, no existe, pero todas las fuentes son de hace más de un año. salu2
jptolosa (2018-03-26 01:47:10+00:00): Hola Felipe, qué tal.
Todo indica que no existe, ya que según el historial fue creado por un usuario extranjero hace 6 años para solucionar un "warning" por cruce de río y la última fuente de hace un año indica que no existe. Según esa última fuente el camino se termina en el margen norte del río, mientras que del otro lado  sería un camino privado según la imagen satelital.
Voy a hacer la corrección, saludos.
jptolosa (2018-03-26 01:52:32+00:00): Corrijo lo último que dije, el camino del lado sur del río es público, pero queda la duda de si es posible vadear el río.
felipeeugenio (2018-03-26 11:01:09+00:00): ok, buenísimo, gracias
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-03 22:16:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44147307 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of motorcycle parking locations from Bundesverband der Motorradfahrer. See discussion of changeset 44071123 for details.
SomeoneElse (2016-11-29 13:42:16+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy
user_5359 (2016-11-29 20:48:52+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-12-09 05:59:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148419096: Is an additional tunnel=yes and layer=-1 useful?
KKS (2016-11-30 13:11:48+00:00): Привіт, може насип вузькоколійки зробити суцільною лінією? 
Чи то так задумано сегментами?
Nasze Miasto Niepołomice (2016-11-29 12:16:19+00:00): Uchwała już została podjęta
maraf24 (2016-11-29 12:19:58+00:00): I co ma z tego wynikać?
Czy ulice zmieniły swoje nazwy? Nie, i nie zmienią do końca roku.
Nasze Miasto Niepołomice (2016-11-29 20:43:45+00:00): Ale warto pozmieniać to wcześniej żeby 1 stycznia nie zostały nieaktualne, a zmieniania jest na kilka dni. Można dać dwie nazwy na razie.
maraf24 (2016-11-29 21:56:41+00:00): Można dać np. proposed_name lub jakiś inny tag, tak, by potem szybko zmienić.
1 stycznia i tak będziemy poprawiać granice i miejscowości, jak co roku.
I jeszcze coś: przy zmianach urzędowych nazw warto wpisać starą nazwę do old_name, gdyż jeszcze przez dość długi czas funkcjonuje ona w obiegu, no i pomaga to przy poprawach adresów. Tutaj w niektórych przypadkach będzie też zmiana numerów domów.
Nasze Miasto Niepołomice (2016-11-29 12:19:21+00:00): Zostały zmienione, naprawdę usilne pozostawianie starych nazw nie sprawi że miejscowości nie zostaną włączone do Opola bo i tak zostaną i bardzo dobrze że zostaną włączone.
maraf24 (2016-11-29 12:22:48+00:00): Nie zostały zmienione, bo Opole nie może zmienić nazw w miejscowościach, które mu nie podlegają administracyjnie.
Nasze Miasto Niepołomice (2016-11-29 20:44:39+00:00): Ależ podlegają, prawda taka że ona są od dawna częścią Opola. Całe Komprachcice nawet, to tylko dopełnienie administracyjnej gwoli ścisłości.
maraf24 (2016-11-29 22:01:03+00:00): Może i związki z Opolem są silne, ale nic to tu nie daje. Oficjalnie to inne gminy.
user_5359 (2016-11-29 20:45:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
indigomc (2016-11-29 08:26:02+00:00): Please explain what you are adding usefully, in reasonable detail. Thanks.
mavl (2017-10-21 09:43:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
user_5359 (2016-11-29 20:45:20+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-05 09:46:10+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
indigomc (2016-11-29 17:20:47+00:00): This is nowhere near Lalbagh is it? Please do not experiment with the map, and please delete your edits if they don't represent a real object.
demon_box (2016-12-20 12:23:02+00:00): "surface=dirt, concrete" è errato
o metti dirt o metti concrete ma non entrambi.
grazie, ciao
mavl (2017-10-21 09:43:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
dvdhoven (2016-11-29 10:22:57+00:00): Henk,

Je hebt knooppunt 88 verplaatst van de hoek Kerkstraat/Schild naar de naamknoop Rijssen. Daardoor zijn er 4 knooppuntroutes kapot gegaan.
Knooppunt 88 heb ik bewust op de hoek Kerkstraat/Schild gelegd omdat daar een splitspunt is van het fietsknooppuntennetwerk.
Je kunt fietsknooppunten niet zomaar verplaatsen, dan komen routes in de problemen.
Heel vriendelijk verzoek om als je iets aan het fietsknooppuntennetwerk wilt doen, overleg dan eerst met mij. Ik heb het allemaal in de kop zitten zoals ze dat in het oosten noemen en ik heb het ook allemaal foutvrij gemaakt en precies zoals het buiten ligt.

Ik heb daar veel werk aan gehad en het is niet fijn als iemand er dan aan gaat wijzigen zonder dat daar enige noodzaak voor is.
Afgelopen zondag ben ik er nog langs gekomen en er is niets veranderd aan knooppunt 88.
Dit is een gesplitst knooppunt met 2 splitspunten. De routes zijn daar ook op ingericht.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
HJS_Holten (2016-11-29 10:40:19+00:00): Beste Dick,

Die wijziging was niet mijn bedoeling. Sorry. Nee ik zag dat Rijssen als plaats (town) er 2x in stond. Dat leek me teveel van het goede.
Ik was aan het checken omdat blijkbaar Apeldoorns als plaats (tijdelijk) verwijderd is geweest. Ik wilde afgelopen weekend navigeren naar Apeldoorn en de hele plaats was onbekend op de onbetaalde app Offline Maps & Navigation waarvan je in de onbetaalde versie maar 1x per jaar een update krijgt.

Trouwens het bijhouden van de fietsknooppunten: dank dat je dat allemaal gedaan hebt, want bij Holten (aan de zuidkant) is veel veranderd en de de geplaatste borden door Rijssen-Holten (Rijssen onze partnergemeente, wat ik altijd zeg) vind ik maar slecht. Je ziet nauwelijks hoe de routes in het Gelderse (Achterhoek) doorlopen.

Trouwens ik gebruik ook vaak de app OSMAnd+. Maar deze is heel erg traag en crasht om de haverklap. Zal wel met het weinige geheugen van mijn smartphone hebben te maken (Ace2 met2GB geheugen + 16GB op externe kaart).

Met vriendelijke groet,

Henk Stoevenbelt
Holten
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
demon_box (2016-11-29 20:54:18+00:00): ciao, scusami ancora, mappare questo punto così non è proprio corretto:

description=quadrivie
ele=724
name=piazzale Sovino

rimane un dato inconsistente cioè privo un tag principale, andrebbe invece mappato così:

place=locality
description:it=Quadrivie (non fondamentale)
ele=724
name=Piazzale Sovino

grazie.
PlaneMad (2018-12-29 19:42:24+00:00): Have changed some of the areas that were wrongly marked as farmyard to other landuses. Please check.
user_5359 (2016-11-29 19:25:27+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Leider muss ich Deinen Änderungen komplett zurückdrehen.

Begründung für die anderen Mapper
Übersetzung Russisch ==> Deutsch
магазин обуви ==> Schuhgeschäft
 бытовая химия ==> Haushalts-Chemikalien
супермаркет ==> Supermarkt

Damit keine Übersetzung der Namen sondern nur allgemeine Begriff, deshalb Revert des Changeset.

Ansonsten wäre ein verschieben in Richtung name:ru möglich gewesen.

Bitte das Thema Mehrsprachigkeit von Angaben erforschen, bevor weitere Änderungen vorgenommen werden.
Hb- (2017-11-19 12:48:15+00:00): Warum wurde bei dem Gastank https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456552996 neu content=gasmm getagged? Wäre nitrogen nicht besser?
IceQb (2017-11-20 07:47:33+00:00): Ja ich denke das wäre es. Änderst du das gleich?
Hb- (2017-11-20 08:58:22+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53943024
Capello13 (2016-11-29 17:45:42+00:00): Bonsoir,
J'ai corrigé aujourd'hui un certain nombre de vos ajouts concernant le vol libre. Pour contribuer dans ce domaine vous pouvez vous appuyer sur cette page wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:sport%3Dfree_flying.
En espérant vous voir ajouter encore pleins de sites de vol (avec les orientations ça serait super!).
Capello13
74523978 (2016-11-29 20:46:46+00:00): De bocht loopt andersom.
Commodoortje (2016-11-30 07:54:17+00:00): Kun je het aanpassen?
jfd553 (2020-10-02 19:51:59+00:00): Areas ring not closed? 
Six years ago I mapped all commercial areas around boulevard Bourque from Sherbrooke to Magog, mostly using multipolygon relations. According to this changeset history, you seem to have deleted about everything I did. Any explanation?
kartler175 (2020-10-08 13:48:15+00:00): This was the situation before my edit: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/YQg .Way #275138001 was removed from the multipolygon probably by concatenating to a non.member way (see history: http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3661442). Therefore the outline of the area was no more closed.
What I did was to remove the highway from the relation, because a physical object is not a appropriate representation for a virtual line like an area outline. Then I completed the remaining member way to a closed ring and transfered the area tags from the multipolygon to the way. Then I deleted the multipolygon because for an area consisting of only one outer ring no relation is needed.