piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Grant Humphries (2015-01-13 23:32:31+00:00): Hi Jack, 

Are you aware that you marked the viaduct that the new light rail line and buses will run on as a cycleway in this change set?  According coworkers I've checked with here at TriMet this bridge does/will not allow bikes and is also still under construction.  You also linked the viaduct to the street network in places that it passes above and does not connect to those streets.  I spent a lot of time adding the infrastructure that is a part of the Portland-Milwaukie Light Rail project based on construction drawings and I've seen that you've changed things to what I know to be incorrect in at least a couple areas.  I would just ask that if you're unsure about an area abstain from making edits until you have more/better information.  Also feel free to contact me as we have a lot resources here such as recent aerial imagery, design plans etc.

Best, 

-Grant
jknewl (2015-01-14 05:11:39+00:00): Very sorry about my confusion in that complicated area, happy to leave it up to you.
jknewl (2015-01-14 05:15:43+00:00): I was of course trying to put in the new multi-use link that lies almost directly under the western trackway.  Are you planning to or have you already put that in?
Grant Humphries (2015-01-14 20:34:25+00:00): No problem Jack and thanks for the quick response.  I've just added in the new bike paths that you mentioned above (and that area is extremely complex!)
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-12-13 02:48:11+00:00): Szanowny mapowiczu.
Dokonałeś jakiegoś importu punktów adresowych.
a) nie podałeś źródła pochodzenia tych danych
b) nie otagowałeś poprawnie punktów adresowych
c) dane adresowe zawierają błędne kodowanie polskich znaków
d) nie podałeś w komentarzu informacji czy odfiltrowałeś istniejące adresy. Jeśli nie odfiltrowałeś, mamy teraz mnóstwo zdublowanych adresów
e) nie skonsultowałeś tego importu ze społecznością
f) nie wykonałeś importu z oddzielnego konta, czego wymaga DWG
W związku z tym Twój import zostanie prawdopodobnie wycofany.
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-12-13 02:57:40+00:00): Dyskusja na ten temat: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=471105#p471105
Raczek (2014-12-13 10:20:16+00:00): Dzień dobry,
No chcę wprowadzić punkty adresowe żeby potem wykorzystać te dane w Systemie Wspomagania Decyzji w Straży Pożarnej. Wymyśliłem że wprowadzę ściągnięte dane ze strony: 
http://www.codgik.gov.pl/index.php/darmowe-dane/prg.html
i z czasem będę je poprawiał do tego co jest w rzeczywistości. Jak jest nie tak to trudno. Ale całego powiatu nie będę przepisywał np. z geoportalu bo za dużo roboty. Nam potrzebne są punkty adresowe do łatwego naprowadzania zastępów do zdarzenia. Te dane już wprowadziłem do systemu u nas ale chciałem też dać do OSM i poprawiać jak by było coś nie tak. Bondziszki przepisałem z geoportalu, ale to dużo czasu pochłania. Rzeczywiście dane mogą się nakładać i tego nie przemyślałem.
aceman444 (2014-12-17 22:50:24+00:00): Dobry den, dokoncite tie relacie 4271377 a 4271376? Dakujem.
Peter Potisk (2014-12-18 09:04:09+00:00): To som sa pokúšal spraviť hranicu PSČ, ale zistil som že neviem ako na to. Vadia tam tie relácie?
aceman444 (2014-12-20 00:52:17+00:00): Myslim, ze v Bratislave by sa nejake vhodne relacie dali najst na odkukanie. Ale ak sa Vam to nepodari najst, radsej tie relacie odstrante. Nedokoncene neuzavrete oblasti vadia, lebo na ne upozornuju rozne programy, ktore kontroluju spravnost dat.
Skippern (2014-12-15 20:43:15+00:00): acho deve ser tourism=motel em vez de tourism=hotel
mmorgado (2014-12-15 22:24:25+00:00): Alterado
Obrigado
SomeoneElse (2014-12-16 00:26:18+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317012247 seems to have no tags.  What were you trying to add it as?
tosky (2014-12-12 23:44:37+00:00): Il sentiero è già marcato con il nome "Via Pian di Zucchero"; motivazioni particolari per marcare questo punto?
ScottNelson (2016-11-12 04:11:36+00:00): I tried to go up the trail heading north from Rabbit Lane today, and ended up bushwhacking the final 100m along the creek. to Deep Dene Road.  Does this trail really connect out to Stevens drive?  If so I didn't see any sign of it going that way when I was running up it.
mbiker (2016-11-12 04:15:52+00:00): Been a while since I was there. I sort of remember being able to to Stevens but things could have changed.
Hjart (2014-12-13 09:59:23+00:00): Kan du gå en tur med en gps på de nye veje (gerne et par gange frem og tilbage) og uploade sporet, så vi andre har bedre mulighed for at tjekke hvad du har lavet?
naoliv (2014-12-13 01:09:34+00:00): Os dados que você inseriu estão sem as informações necessárias para dizer o que são. Por exemplo, as estradas não possuem uma tag dizendo que são estradas.
Do modo como estão agora, só são linhas vazias.
JimUren (2014-12-13 09:57:51+00:00): road does not exist
SomeoneElse (2015-01-11 20:42:16+00:00): Just wondering if the western end of Applemarket street is perhaps best described as a highway=pedestrian rather than a highway=footway?  If it's a former road that is now foot traffic only, pedestrian might be better.
JustStupid (2015-01-12 18:46:47+00:00): oh yeah, it's not staying like that, been trying to get the high street finished off, but the intention is to show the pedestrian areas as areas rather than lines as is shown further up the town centre from the witton street / witton walk / leicester street "crossroads" onwards. I must admit it's causing me problems and my brain despite cudgels is refusing to give up the information. Am pretty sure i'm right as far as i go, but there's more shops than rooftops and i'm struggling. Might actually have to get out of my car and walk :( (i regard that as cheating. i should be able to come up with every shop, road, alley and parking bay from memory). But yes, will alter that now to pedestrian, need to come up with a better solution for the Bullring as well - again, might be better by area rather than showing as individual paths?
GerdP (2015-10-21 19:22:04+00:00): please review:
way 39080865 has the tag
highway=unmarked_route
which is rarely used.
Does it mean something like
highway=path,trail_visibility=no ?
GerdP (2015-11-12 10:47:23+00:00): or maybe man_made=cutline?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dcutline
AKLAB (2014-12-13 05:47:32+00:00): In the last 3 years Whiteman AFB as redone more than 10 roads on base and have acquired lands adjacent to the existing boundary. Imagery used in OpenStreetMap is several years old. They have also re-named several road. Please contact Whiteman AFB GeoBase/Civil Engineering for more information.
treestryder (2015-05-16 19:56:28+00:00): Mind me asking where you got the data for the bus stops and routes? Did you have to gather it manually? I keep thinking there must be a way to pull stop information from CATA's HiWire web application (http://tp.cata.org/hiwire). CATA must have given this same data to Google, for their maps. With stop times even.
Peter Beard (2015-05-16 20:39:09+00:00): I tried to figure out how to get the info from CATA's website, but gave up pretty quickly. I ended up just surveying the routes that I had convenient access to and using that data. If you do figure out how to emancipate data from HiWire I'd love to know how; I tried to work it out for a couple of hours before I gave up.
treestryder (2015-05-16 21:20:14+00:00): Wish I had more time.

What would REALLY be nice, is if CATA would take the task on. I wonder if OSM has an easy way for public transportation administrators to maintain their routes.
NetWormKido (2014-12-14 19:26:38+00:00): Чтобы востаовить аккаунт опиши на форуме проблему http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=499
Protu (2014-12-13 09:56:25+00:00): U turn in forbiden on this corssoad
Supaplex (2014-12-13 16:23:12+00:00): 你好：
疊球場是用leisure=pitch, sport=softball
我已經將三個球場修改完畢了
tweant (2015-07-06 09:24:41+00:00): 317068354, v1 to chyba marzenie edytującego albo wizja odległej przyszłości :) Jakieś źródło, bo w rzeczywistości chyba nie istnieje
joernhb (2014-12-13 12:45:14+00:00): Behörde hinzugefügt.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-19 11:09:47+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3233013313/history has a key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-19 13:45:48+00:00): to be more clear: what a=S128a means in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3233013313/history ?
Hjart (2014-12-15 10:23:04+00:00): Der var ikke kommet junction=roundabout tags på et par rundkørsler (Klintholmvej/Brogårdsvej). Det har jeg rettet (+ justeret en del i Tjæreborg generelt)
mikini (2014-12-15 11:57:54+00:00): Arh, sad og rodede efter roundabout i Potlach, som ikke formåede at hjælpe mig med at huske junction tagget ;). Takker, for hjælpen i http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27448004.
Polarbear (2015-03-01 16:23:13+00:00): Please do not delete things in Openstreetmap simply because you do not understand them. These lines were tagged natural=tree_rows, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree_row
The trees are restored.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-17 15:42:36+00:00): At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/977901343/history you've extrapolated "highway=traffic_signals" from "highway=tr".  What was the evidence for this?
Ropino (2015-01-18 10:29:55+00:00): Aerial view of bing with the typical traffic light poles and their shadows, including the road marking.
Where I'm here not sure if the railway exists between the lanes.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-18 12:19:14+00:00): Re the railway, it might be worth adding a note or trying to contact local mappers to see whether it's still operational.  It's not clear from te imagery, and there seem to be trees growing in some places where it should be.
marimil-importy (2014-12-13 16:44:51+00:00): Import budynków wykonany z niewłaściwego konta.
Polyglot (2014-12-16 23:54:26+00:00): Thank you for your contributions to HOT. I converted all the other huts which were mapped as nodes to building contours. It seems better this way. Ctrl-d is your friend :-)

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Tasking_Manager/Validating_data/Changeset_comment_missing
t_ja (2014-12-20 14:38:44+00:00): Ahoj, zase sa nezobrazuje na mape multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1438112 . Tentoraz je problem v tom, ze si z neho odstranil tag, ze sa jedna o les. Predpokladam, ze si to neurobil umyselne, a preto ma zaujima, ako sa da NECHTIAC odstranit 4 tagy + 2 ponechat + pridat cez cele Nizke Tatry popis "Banska halda"?! Davaj si preto prosim vacsi pozor, ake zmeny robis a na ktorych objektoch ich robis... A takmer som si tento komentar dal k vlastnemu changesetu, kedze som tagovanie uz opravil :)
Mirecnet (2015-01-07 21:04:52+00:00): Ahoj,
nespravil som to umyselne. Zrejme som si len daco nevsimol a spravil som chybu.
Dakujem za opravu.
aceman444 (2014-12-14 12:37:58+00:00): Dobry den,
tam kde sa krizuje potok s cestou (way 317109251) ste dali layer=-1. Tam ide naozaj cesta pod potokom? Nechcelo to byt layer=1+bridge=yes ?
Peter Vojtek (2014-12-14 12:57:52+00:00): zdravim,
potok tam krizuje cestu bez mosta, je to brod.
ak existuje nejaky lepsi sposob ako tuto skutocnost znacit, rad si necham poradit.
aceman444 (2014-12-14 13:09:22+00:00): Skuste ford=yes, bez 'layer'.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ford
Ak Vam JOSM bude nadavat, ze sa krizuju cesty, mozete ten brod zredukovat je jeden spolocny bod cesty a potoka (teraz to mate ako dlhsi usek, co je divne, ak mate potok len ako ciaru (nie plochu)). Dlzka brodu a sirka potoka (vodnej plochy) by mala byt identicka a teda zaciatok a koniec brodu by mal byt na spolocnych bodoch v okrajom vody.
Peter Vojtek (2014-12-14 13:18:37+00:00): vdaka, je to tam
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27457820
aceman444 (2014-12-14 13:43:00+00:00): Super, dakujem.
geri-oc (2016-12-06 08:38:34+00:00): Prinzipiell finde ich Forstreviere gut. Aber du solltest note=* gegen description:de=* tauschen.
note= Mitteilung an Mapper
description=Beschreibung
TIPP:
name sollte vielleich loc_name= werden und dann zusammenfassen "Forstrevier Hirschberg 4". oder stehen dort direkt Schilder "Forstrevier Hirschberg"?
aceman444 (2014-12-14 12:33:15+00:00): Dobry, ta druha restauracia v tej istej budove je iny podnik?
Jose Riha (2014-12-16 07:01:19+00:00): mate pravdu, nevsimol som si, ze takto je otagovana aj cela budova. uz by to malo byt okej. dakujem.
Polyglot (2014-12-17 00:49:07+00:00): Hi Barbie,
Thank you for your contributions to Openstreetmap and HOT. I've converted all Building=Hut to building=hut. The tags are case sensitive and we try to avoid using capital letters in them.
(Ik spreek ook Nederlands)
SomeoneElse (2014-12-15 11:30:30+00:00): Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317130424 is now "landuse=commercial"?  I haven't seen it from either side on the ground, but from the Bing imagery it looks like a sewage works to me.
neuhausr (2014-12-22 16:02:17+00:00): Are these forward/backward nodes supposed to be in a relation or something? It's not really clear why they're there
korky99_04 (2014-12-22 19:22:01+00:00): You are correct, that is an error. It has been corrected in changeset 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27636670

The error was reguarding the mapping of stop signs.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dstop#Tagging_minor_road_stops

I had initially done the full stop sign relation, where you tag the intersection as a stop, and then the stopping point as well, with highway=stop, and direction=forward/backward.  My preference would be to only put the stop points where the traffic stops, and then specify direction, however since the wiki is clear to in all cases mark the intersection at 4 way stops, I decided to not mark the stopping points as well.  this is beacuse doing so would throw off routing software which would see a 4 way stop marked this way as having two stop signs, and would give a double time penalty to that intersection in routing.

When I removed the highway=stop tag, I missed also removing the direction=forward/backward tag.

thanks for catching this error of mine.

All the best.
Robert Ancell (2014-12-15 04:06:22+00:00): This change has marked the St Francis Retreat Centre as a hospital. As far as I can tell it is a monastary.

http://www.stfrancisretreatcentre.org.nz/
skquinn (2014-12-14 07:09:20+00:00): OOPS. Should be "Change name of street resolving note 286146." Me and my fat fingers.
skquinn (2014-12-14 07:41:12+00:00): Sigh.

I. Am. The. World's. Biggest. Blockhead.
dcapillae_old (2017-01-30 21:03:02+00:00): Hi, mdk!

For this kind of water barrier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317150052, I think that it is better "waterway=weir" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dweir). "waterway=dam" is perfect for something like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358211312
mdk (2017-01-31 20:01:21+00:00): Hi dcapiiae,

It's difficult. For me a 'wire' is a building which is normally floowed by the water (see also the pictures in the wiki 'waterway=wire').

But these buildings are higher than a normal power pole (6-7 meters). They are overflooded only on high water. This looks more like a dam.

Perhaps these buildings should be mapped by their function - which is not absolutly claer for me.

A wire is slowing down the speed of a stream to prevent erosion. A dam should stop the water to use it for irrigation or energy.

For me it looks more like a dam, but with the function of a wire. So feel free to improve the map.

regards
mdk
dcapillae_old (2017-01-31 20:56:36+00:00): Thank you, mdk!

I have been mapping some streams and paths in Montes de Málaga, mainly in Montes de Málaga Natural Park (http://osm.org/go/b7C5VEY?m=) and also near 'Embalse de El Limonero' (http://osm.org/go/b7Cywfz1--?m=). I hope to continue mapping here soon.

Thank you for your comment, and thank you very much for mapping this area!
5m4u9 (2014-12-28 03:33:59+00:00): revertido los datos acá actualizados por duplicidad y creación sin sentido de relaciones...
Marc_ch (2022-07-10 22:43:13+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317151665
as-tu connaissance d'étages dans la tour de la sous-station ? cela me semble peu probable malgré sa hauteur
Salutations,
Marc
gregja1974 (2014-12-14 08:44:59+00:00): Edits around Firefly, NSW
*Martin* (2014-12-15 18:03:57+00:00): Ahoj Kantek

Vsetko super, len prosim pridavaj popis ku svojim zmenam.

Dakujem
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:35:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3233954648/history has access:hgv that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using hgv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv ) be fitting at least equally well?
KnMoon (2014-12-25 03:51:30+00:00): 關於大坑八號步道
使用highway=service可能會與車用道混淆，
如果這是為了區別八號步道水泥路段與木棧階梯路段，是否參考大坑四號步道使用highway=track會比較好？
andygol (2014-12-14 13:10:18+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:01:36+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:01:53+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:02:14+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:09:04+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:08:58+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:08:51+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:08:45+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:08:38+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:08:30+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:08:22+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:08:10+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:08:00+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:07:54+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:07:47+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:07:41+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:07:36+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:07:30+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:07:18+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:07:09+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:07:04+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:06:57+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:06:50+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:06:44+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:06:38+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:06:31+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:06:25+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:06:19+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:06:14+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:06:07+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:06:00+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:05:53+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:05:47+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:05:40+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
JohnDoe23 (2014-12-15 11:57:00+00:00): Ich habe das Denkmal auf ["Denkmal"](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic=memorial?uselang=de) herabgestuft. Als Monument werden nur wirklich monumentale Bauten eingestuft: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic%3Dmonument

Gruß
andygol (2014-12-14 13:05:32+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:05:26+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:05:20+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
Wulfmorn (2018-10-13 10:13:05+00:00): Hello. In this changeset you added the unusual value "lit=1" to this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26730538. Hopefully you will be able to fix this.
Reclus (2018-10-13 11:01:04+00:00): Thank you! It should have been lit=yes of course. I fixed it. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63482390#map=17/51.44599/7.40100
woodpeck (2021-12-08 20:49:44+00:00): Dear microzorzo, a very long time ago you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317178713 as an unclassified road. It has meanwhile been downgraded to "service"; however we now have a complaint from a land owner saying that this was a "strada  privata con divieto al transito". Further it is claimed that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30044415 which you last edited a year ago and which has foot=yes,horse=yes,bicycle=yes in OSM, was an "argine privato". The complaint further claims that "il tratto di argine dall'incrocio del Timonchio-Bacchiglioncello (poi Bacchiglione) verso Villaverla è sedime arginato in piena proprietà scrivente per il quale è interdetto/vietato ogni tipo di accesso (con sbarramento di divisione colturale)." -- Is this something that you could help us with? Do you think these claims are true?
saintam1 (2014-12-14 22:10:49+00:00): Привет, gramic,

Добре дошли в OpenStreetMap! Смятате ли да добавяте още адреси? Това би било много полезно. Мерси.
gramic (2014-12-14 22:23:18+00:00): Здравейте,
Най-вероятно няма да добавям повече в близко бъдеще. Направих го за да екпериментирам и от любопитство добавих само един адрес който знам със сигурност. Разбирам че ще е полезно и след време може да добавя още неща.
andygol (2014-12-14 13:04:47+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:04:41+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:04:33+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:04:26+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:04:22+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:04:15+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:04:11+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:04:05+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:04:00+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"
andygol (2014-12-14 13:03:55+00:00): Wrong changeset description.
Right description is: "adding name:ru[uk|en] tag"