piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:33:38+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
eggie (2019-04-18 07:21:58+00:00): Dag Thijs.. 
Let op.. Je plakt de landuse aan de wegen. Het wordt dan extreem lastig om de kaart verder te bewerken door anderen.
Niet plakken dus.
Je kunt plakken voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken.
Je kunt ook overstappen naar de beter editor JOSM.
Die is meer geschikt voor dit soort werk.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       
Dit waren je edits. Kijk je nog even?

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69332644
eggie (2019-04-18 07:31:39+00:00): Thijs.. het pad heb ik weer losgemaakt van de landuse. Het nz pad eindigde ook op de landuse =forest en heb ik ook aangesloten op het pad met de wandelroutes.
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2019-07-21 15:48:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
moila (2019-11-15 16:29:42+00:00): "Hi Dmitriev_DA,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Kuala Terengganu, I have come across some of the ways 
"way 684516676
way 684516674
way 684516675
way 684516669
way 684516671
way 684516668
way 684516666
way 684516663
way 684516658
way 684516659
way 684516657"
classified as 'service'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:33:00+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
nevw (2019-04-18 09:07:37+00:00): The lack of convention tagging expectation make this edit unsuitable for osm and appears to be only designed for search engine optimisation.
Can you add suitable tags to identify and locate the business in osm.
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/37585/how-do-i-add-my-business
taxi301 (2019-05-02 09:32:42+00:00): przy McDonald's w Człuchowie nie ma stacji benzynowej , usunięte
taxi301 (2019-05-02 09:42:38+00:00): a za McDonald's nie ma żadnego sklepu , jest trawa
eggie (2019-04-18 10:14:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:32:48+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:32:38+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:48:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
chnav (2019-04-20 17:13:00+00:00): Пожалуйста не пишите форму собственности в названиях "ТОО" и прочее - ну кому они нужны на международной карте ??? Форма собственности не является частью названия, и кавычки тоже не нужны.
Phyks (2019-04-23 09:03:05+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourquoi avoir supprimé la barrière ici ? Est-elle bien absente sur le terrain ?

Bonne journée,
Vinber-Pro (2019-04-23 13:11:14+00:00): Bonjour, si vous avez une réponse, ne pas hésiter à le signaler, cela serait une première !
bonne fin de journée
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:32:30+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:48:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:48:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2019-04-18 16:57:23+00:00): Dag M... 
Netjes ingetekend. 
Ik heb de brandgangen omgezet naar highway-=footway.. path zou ook kunnen. pedestrian is meer voor voetgangers/winkelgebieden.
MVG,
Eggie
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:32:18+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:32:15+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
eggie (2019-04-18 10:36:39+00:00): Dag Mighty Squid... 
Goed dat je zaken toevoegt. 
De brug zat aan de oever vastgeplakt. Die moet eigenlijk altijd los liggen van de natural=water.
In de BGT is niet te zien dat er een brug is. Als voorbeeld heb ik een duiker ingetekend.
waterway=canal,
tunnel=culvert
layer=-1
Het water aan de oostkant lag op de landuse. (orchard en playground- werk van een andere mapper)
Ik heb dat even ingebed in de landuse.

Mapse verder,
Eggie
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:31:43+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:48:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:48:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:48:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:48:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Tomas Straupis (2019-04-19 05:07:13+00:00): talk-lt buvo diskusija, kad užtvanka neina ties tvenkinio/vandens kraštu. Ji yra šiek tiek toliau - ten, kur yra aukščiausias pylimo taškas/linija. Visos Lietuvos užtvankos jau buvo pataisytos pagal šį talk-lt aptartą principą.
Tomas Straupis (2019-04-19 05:08:34+00:00): Ypatingai svarbi info yra apie kelius, einančius užtvankos viršumi. Todėl tokie keliai karpomi ir jiems dedama waterway=dam žyma.
Litawor (2019-04-19 07:04:22+00:00): O štai Wiki pataria waterway=dam žymėti ties tvenkinio riba.
Ar Lietuvoje užtvankas žymėsime kitaip, nei rekomenduojama globaliai?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddam
Tomas Straupis (2019-04-19 07:32:01+00:00): Nematau, kurioje vietoje parašyta apie poziciją? T.y. ant tvenkinio krašto ar toliau.
Ir beje, ten pat yra ir šiek tiek apie kelio žymėjimą su užtvanka, ir tada yra parašyta (ir vėliau mano pridėti pavyzdžiai). Lietuvoje absoliuti dauguma užtvankų turi jos viršuje einantį kelią.
(Kitas dalykas, Lietuvoje mes gerokai toliau esame pažengę su žymėjimu, nei kad wikis aprašo).
Litawor (2019-04-19 07:38:59+00:00): Pozicija gerai matoma pateiktame žymėjimo pavyzdyje. Geriau vieną kartą pamatyti, negu šimtą kartų išgirsti ar perskaityti. :)

OK, lai būna kaip sakai.
Tik būtų gerai, kad validatoriai nesikabinėtų ir wiki straipsnis atsinaujintų.
Tomas Straupis (2019-04-19 07:56:49+00:00): Validatoriai nesikabinėja(?).
Wiki man nėra labai įdomus dalykas, tai paliksiu kitiems tuo užsiimti. Nebent lietuviškame puslapyje įrašysiu tai, kas buvo susitarta diskusijoje čia:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-lt/2018-December/002291.html
mavl (2019-07-21 15:48:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Johan_LIQ (2019-04-18 09:12:26+00:00): Kommentaren var inte helt rätt. Jag har ju lagt till en grusväg. My comment was wrong. I have added a gravel road, not Eksjöhus kontor.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:48:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mikini (2019-04-19 09:57:43+00:00): Organisationen er ny, stedet blev overtaget af ham der driver Brorsonsminde. Tilføjede ellers alle nye oplysninger i OsmAnd i det der blev https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69336424, men kan se at softwaren har klokket i det og bare fjernet amenity helt. Har korrigeret i https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69371137.
Pierce (2019-08-13 15:51:11+00:00): Hey there,

It appears you have attached a whole bunch of incorrect Wikidata tags to suburbs etc that are parishes, and not the actual suburb Wikidata entry.
Can you please be more careful in the future when using this tool?

Thanks in advance.
Edward (2019-08-13 16:01:08+00:00): Thanks Pierce, this is very interesting. I'll be more careful in future.
Rainero (2019-04-30 16:46:30+00:00): Hallo SeisenB,

hier hat sich ein falscher Straßenname eingeschlichen: es müßte Baumkirchner Straße sein - oder ist der Laden an der falschen Stelle eingetragen? 

Servus,
Rainer
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:31:11+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
sergeybe (2019-04-18 19:50:45+00:00): Не занимайтесь вандализмом, вы только позорите себя и свою страну.
Ваша правка ушла в откат.
canfe (2020-12-19 19:58:34+00:00): Ma il canale che va alla centrale dove sbuca?
E la centrale di cos'è?
Va tolto il nome che non può essere quello e messo il tag relativo alla tipologia.
Ti ricordi ancora?
cartomatto (2020-12-20 09:15:39+00:00): Sono dettagli che si trovano sulla IGM.
Il nome non vedo perchè non vada bene: è quello indicato dall'IGM.
Questa avversione per i nomi non la capisco... palazzo reale a torino lo chiami solo "reale" perchè palazzo c'è già il tag?
il monte banco lo chiami "bianco" perchè il tag c'è gia? la fontana di trevi la chiami "trevi" perchè il tag c'è già?
direi di no.
canfe (2020-12-20 11:33:53+00:00): Bisogna fare due discorsi.
1) non si può copiare dalle IGM. No, non ne abbiamo il diritto. Purtroppo. Se non sei convinto scrivi sul TALK nazionale e se cambiano idea li aggiungo tutti io in valle.
2) Il nome deve essere "proprio". Nel caso  Palazzo Madama ha palazzo nel nome, ma non vanno etichettati gli oggetti in base al tag. Insomma panchina non ha il nome panchina.
ma-rt-in (2019-04-18 14:06:14+00:00): Hallo,
wie heißt den der Kindergarten und der kiosk?
vg
fmkeller (2019-05-29 06:36:34+00:00): Moin,

Kita Auenstraße, Träger ist die AWO
Elissa Kiosk GmbH

VG
ma-rt-in (2019-06-02 21:46:33+00:00): Trägst du es dann auch noch einer oder lässt du es so?
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Irfandi IRM-ED (2022-12-20 06:09:15+00:00): Hi Xenomorph22.
Your edits look good, but based on recent imagery I found that this object is not a body water (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/684550328). So I have to delete it.
Thank you for your understanding.
Happy mapping!
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Mordechai23 (2019-04-19 10:07:09+00:00): Tak, w Polsce raczej nie łączy się torów tramwajowych z ulicą bo nie ma takiej potrzeby, ale nie jest też to błąd.
Robin007 (2019-04-23 20:58:31+00:00): Dzięki za informację. Nowy walidator przy edycji w przeglądarce (iD) zgłasza błąd, dlatego wolałem się upewnić.
Zatem kasuję FixMe.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:30:33+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Frans S (2019-05-09 14:20:08+00:00): Hello Renate. Thanks for mapping here.
I review mappings before validating them and correct wrongly mapped objects.
A remark. I noticed that you mapped a highway in the scrub as footway and sidewalk.  You don't expect that kind of highways here.Those belong in City parks and alongside town streets. Please take a look to this wiki how to tag them
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
I corrected them. ( do not tag crossings as unmarked highway crossing)
This guide might be of interest  as well .
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot/West_African_HOT_Mapping_Tips#Small_Village_and_Road_Mapping
Despite this has been called for West Africa. Most of the subjects are valid as well overhere.
Best regards and keep mapping
Flurps (2019-09-29 21:51:42+00:00): Hey there -- thanks for filling in your details so comprehensively! The addition is welcome.

My only two notes (you requested a review) is that the elevation is set on the Harem Pants node (point), this is the nerdy elevation, so obviously not 0m above sea level... even if close! :)

Other than that, the descriptions on both points should be more objective; Less "We are ..." etc. Short and concise.

Cheers and thanks again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69339104
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
sommerluk (2019-04-18 15:50:44+00:00): 👍 Merci bien pour les noms des bâtiments ! C’est bien d’avoir ça en OSM maintenant – surtout en Côte d’Ivoire, où ces noms de bâtiment sont très importants. Merci !
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-18 11:29:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69341067 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester. See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-18 11:29:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69341067 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester. See block 2548 et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-18 11:29:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69341067 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester. See block 2548 et al
PT-53 (2019-06-03 05:46:30+00:00): Hallo OSMchecker,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz u.a. an diesem Stück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175398231/history der B 30N die Einträge highway=construction + construction=trunk für eine Straße im Bau auf highway=primary + construction=trunk + access=no abgeändert. Das gleiche an den folgenden Straßenstücken.
So ist das auf keinen Fall richtig.
Wie weit ist die Straße denn dort?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-06-23 06:06:10+00:00): Erledigt
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:30:23+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
BeKri (2019-04-18 15:51:27+00:00): Servus,
Es gibt einen Grund,
warum Du das Gebäude gelöscht hast ?
Die Bauarbeiten sind doch schon lange wieder vorbei ..
Gruss derBeKri
Leo Slager (2019-04-30 09:38:43+00:00): De oude stop_position (zonder tags) blijft nog wel deel uitmaken van de routerelaties van de buslijnen en van de stop_area relatie. 
Dat leidt tot hoopjes foutmeldingen.
En als neveneffect verschijnt er geen haltenaam meer in de routes.
Leo Slager (2019-04-30 09:41:10+00:00): Ik ben aan het repareren geslagen, maar het kan even duren voor ik alles gecorrigeerd heb.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-18 12:22:36+00:00): Hello,
Here you have created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684561989 which is a large triangular area with a name and no other tags.  Please don't abuse OpenStreetMap like this - map things properly or not at all.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-18 12:22:52+00:00): مرحبا،
لقد قمت هنا بإنشاء https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684561989 وهي منطقة مثلثية كبيرة بها اسم ولا توجد علامات أخرى. يرجى عدم إساءة استخدام خريطة الشارع المفتوح مثل هذا - خريطة الأشياء بشكل صحيح أو لا على الإطلاق.
تحياتي الحارة،
أندي تاونسند ، بالنيابة عن مجموعة عمل بيانات OSM.
abakus_uploader (2019-04-18 22:30:35+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:29:40+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-18 11:29:43+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69339410, 69339417, 69339431, 69339435, 69339440, 69339448, 69339453.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-18 13:03:03+00:00): Hello,
It makes absolutely no sense to add the name of the village to every building in it. I am aware that you are in an edit war with another mapper about the village name here. Can you please provide some evidence that your name is correct?
Even if your village name is correct, it is still not OK to add it to every building in the village.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-18 13:03:29+00:00): مرحبا،
ليس هناك أي معنى على الإطلاق لإضافة اسم القرية إلى كل مبنى فيها. أنا أدرك أنك في حرب تحرير مع مصمم خرائط آخر حول اسم القرية هنا. هل يمكن أن تقدم بعض الأدلة على صحة اسمك؟
حتى لو كان اسم قريتك صحيحًا ، فلا يزال من غير الجيد إضافته إلى كل مبنى في القرية.
تحياتي الحارة،
أندي تاونسند ، بالنيابة عن مجموعة عمل بيانات OSM.
Vinber-Pro (2019-04-18 13:13:41+00:00): tu as déménagé :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-07-02 16:16:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71796814 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a licence-incompatible import in Italy following a request to the DWG.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2019-May/thread.html#66440 et al.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-18 12:56:09+00:00): Hello,
It makes absolutely no sense to add the name of the village to every building in it.   I am aware that you are in an edit war with another mapper about the village name here.  Can you please provide some evidence that your name is correct?
Even if your village name is correct, it is still not OK to add it to every building in the village.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-18 12:56:47+00:00): مرحبا،
ليس هناك أي معنى على الإطلاق لإضافة اسم القرية إلى كل مبنى فيها. أنا أدرك أنك في حرب تحرير مع مصمم خرائط آخر حول اسم القرية هنا. هل يمكن أن تقدم بعض الأدلة على صحة اسمك؟
حتى لو كان اسم قريتك صحيحًا ، فلا يزال من غير الجيد إضافته إلى كل مبنى في القرية.
تحياتي الحارة،
أندي تاونسند ، بالنيابة عن مجموعة عمل بيانات OSM.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-25 14:26:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69567378 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some name chanegs in Saudi Arabia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2711 for more details.
BaboucheVerte (2025-09-04 06:16:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251400131 's name is Ethulgashinnan 'on the ground sign): updated in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171435334
Sosha1996 (2019-05-02 18:56:15+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست ننویسید «ماکسیم». در کامنت چنجست باید توضیحاتی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:49:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-07-02 16:16:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71796814 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a licence-incompatible import in Italy following a request to the DWG.  See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2019-May/thread.html#66440 et al.
viloan (2019-04-18 12:16:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-27 00:29:03+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-18 12:35:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69342976 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a sockpuppet in Saudi Arabia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2686
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-18 12:35:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69342976 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a sockpuppet in Saudi Arabia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2686
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-18 12:35:45+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 69342655, 69342689, 69342732, 69342766, 69342819, 69342862.
ma-rt-in (2019-04-18 14:03:53+00:00): Hallo,
Soweit ich weiß wird die Synagoge nicht mehr als Synagoge genutzt.