piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 13:35:09+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this change.
These look good to me, the outlines look like they're nice and accurate to the satellite imagery.
If you know the addresses of any of them then it would be great to add that detail too.
mtbbiker99 (2021-10-19 18:03:15+00:00): Das Befahren des Naturschutzgebiets ist für Fahrzeuge..... wer macht den so etwas?
smarties (2021-10-19 20:52:26+00:00): Moin, in der tat ist die Straße von Volkwardingen bis Wilsede sogar eine Kreisstraße. Das Verbots- und Erlaubnisschild wer die Straße befahren darf ist 2qm groß, davon stehen 3 Stück hintereinander um auch alle darauf hinzuweisen und es gibt so gut wie keine Attribute um diese Vorschriften in OSM umzusetzen. Kurz gesagt ist es das was ich in die Notiz geschrieben habe. Für die Allgemeinheit ist es nur via Kutsche, Pferd, Fahrrad oder E-Bike die auf 24Kmh begrenzt sind, erlaubt. Und ja, die gesamte Straße gehört zum Natuschutzgebiet. Für die 10 Anwohner die im NSG leben, Lieferverkehr zum Hotel und Gasthof sowie Agrar, Forstbetrieb gibt es exakte Anweisungen. Gruß smarties
Supaplex (2021-02-13 16:57:42+00:00): 歷史性的編輯其實不太適合放在 OpenStreetMap，因為 OpenStreetMap 注重是當下的地理資訊、圖資。有另一個計畫是 OpenHistoricalMap 可能比較適合放上過去的行政區劃 琼州府
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99213014
user_11435438 (2021-02-16 16:33:01+00:00): 我嘗試過編輯OpenHistoricalMap，但是不知道如何通過JOSM編輯故放棄。boundary=historic是存在於wiki上面的標籤，因此我認爲它存在即是合理的，並且歷史邊界不會對當前地圖產生任何影響。此外日本全國都有歷史邊界，我覺得這看上去蠻不錯的，值得參考。
eggie (2021-02-13 14:19:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Alle gebouwen zijn import vanuit het kadaster. Iets veranderen heeft vaak weinig zin, want er zijn periodieke updates.
Wat bedoel je met 	essentie-aalten?

Is dat een bedrijf?  name= doet niets in OSM zonder de combinatie met shop= of office=  e.d. 

Ik pas gebouw huisnummer 90 even aan de huidige stand van de BAG aan. Wanneer iets niet klopt svp aan het Kadaster doorgeven. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-02-13 14:24:06+00:00): Gebouw nr  aangepast aan BAGdata en overlap gecorrigeerd.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-02-13 14:27:37+00:00): Kijk even bij https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare
of je daar iets kunt vinden.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-13 14:41:49+00:00): Hier kun je zien dat je zelf het Juliana kanaal per abuis hebt veranderd.
De voorgaande mapper is een ervaren Openseamapper van vaarkaarten.
Kijk even naar de tags die er ophoren.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99205635
eggie
eggie (2021-02-13 14:42:21+00:00): Sorry verkeerd commentaar.. bestemt voor iemand anders.  excuses
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-02-13 13:52:19+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إدخال أماكن غير صحيحة إلى الخريطة
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 16:37:29+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
Again, it looks good. Having a look at the aerial imagery, it seems that part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29734862 should actually be a road of some sort, or maybe the road is next to the path? If you have local knowledge you could add that in.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 16:52:48+00:00): Again, all looks good to me
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 16:53:49+00:00): Actually, just this building:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906809910
You've given it a rather jagged corner, which doesn't match what I'm seeing in the aerial imagery
ALu68 (2021-02-14 10:30:00+00:00): Overlapping buildings removed - Quality not improved! 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99243927
eggie (2021-02-15 16:06:40+00:00): Beste Meli .  Graag stoppen met dit soort toevoegingen.
Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.  
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group 

 MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-13 14:58:35+00:00): Dit is je commentaar,

Created a service road because truckdrivers mistake it for van Berckenrodelaan. Added two Offices 73A and 71B. 

Created a service road because truckdrivers mistake it for van Berckenrodelaan. Added two Offices 73A and 71B. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99214806


Op een fietspad geef je niet aan bicycle=yes  en beter ook geen foot=no, want dan routeert het niet meer goed hier.
Het oostelijke fietspad is dat er niet meer?
Het oostelijke fietspad gaat als eenrichtingsverkeersvoetpad verder. oneway=yes bestaat niet op voetpaden. 
Graag reactie

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-02-13 14:59:18+00:00): foot=no vast verwijderd van westelijke fietspad
Daniel92 (2021-02-13 15:04:06+00:00): Aha, weet wat geleerd.
Vanaf de Bloemenlaan tot aan de Intratuin is er nooit een fietspad aan die kant geweest. Dit is altijd een voetpad geweest.
Er is vanaf Vreeburghlaan tot de Bloemenlaan wel een fietspad met voetpad.
Beide fietspaden zowel west als Oost zijn beide richtingen.
eggie (2021-02-13 15:12:00+00:00): oneway=yes en bicycle=no (default) heb ik van het trottoir verwijderd.
Mapse verder
Eggie
eggie (2021-02-13 15:18:08+00:00): Yep.inderdaad. je tagging klopt..alleen een paar kleine foutjes eruit gehaald.
Bij de bushalte heb ik de oversteek nog ingetekend.
Mvg
Eggie
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-13 18:50:26+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this edit.
Thanks for adding this detail, always good to have more things on the map.
Couple of things to note, first What3words addresses can't be put into OSM, see here for details:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What3words
Therefore I've removed those from the three buildings.
Also I can see what you're trying to achieve with the outline round the cottages, but the best thing would be to mark it as a residential area.
In addition, you could add the outlines of the buildings, and add the address details to them, instead of just being points. (Use "addr:housename", instead of name there).
If you want to add more detail, then a retail area round the cafe area would be good, and the car park too.
joost schouppe (2021-05-18 15:17:32+00:00): You mapped it correctly as open. Further discussion is happening at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2536955#map=18/50.81337/4.29866&layers=N
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99215523
zuicz (2021-02-13 14:53:31+00:00): Proszę dodawać opisy do zestawów zmian, a nie samo "(bez komentarza)"
ALu68 (2021-02-14 10:19:18+00:00): Overlapping buildings removed - Quality not improved! 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99243630
eggie (2021-02-13 15:26:43+00:00): 'k Heb het nooit opgemeten.
Zal ongewtijfeld kloppen. 
'k Had het zelf maar snel aangepast, want die kaarten worden daardwerkelijk gebruikt bij navigatie. 
Daar mogen geen fouten inkomen.
Opensource blijft kwetsbaar.
skyper (2021-02-15 15:06:28+00:00): Salli *abq*

Deine Änderungen haben leider alle Bus Relationen und die der L123 durcheinander gebracht.

Hast Du irgendetwas besonderes gemacht oder kann Id immer noch nicht PTv2-Relation richtig händeln?

Habe es gefixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99318244

Grüße skyper
*abq* (2021-02-15 17:13:03+00:00): Hi Skyper,
ich habe den Fernskiwanderweg korrigiert und dafür an der Landesstraße direkt am Wiedemer Eck ein Segment geteilt, um die Relation des Fernwanderwegs durchzuführen. Außer dem Teilen des Way-Abschnitts habe ich an den anderen Relationen nix gemacht.
Macht iD da Probleme? Wäre gut zu wissen, da das ja ein eigentlich ganz normaler Vorgang ist.
VG Reiner
*abq* (2021-02-15 17:26:48+00:00): Hab nochmal nachgeschaut. War ein Abtrennen von 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906825763 vom Bereich östlich davon.
skyper (2021-02-15 17:36:01+00:00): Hi Reiner
Ja, iD achtet anscheinend nicht auf die Reihenfolge und wo der neue Way eingeordnet werden muss. Bei PTv2 gibt es eine vorgegebene Reihenfolge und auch bei anderen Route-Relationen sollten keine zusätzlichen Lücken entstehen. 

Dieser Änderungssatz ist ein einfaches Beispiel. Ich frage mich was iD bei komplexen Situationen wie Schleifen und in verschiedene Richtungen mehrfach verwendete Wege macht.

Ein Testgebiet wäre die Straße "Wasen" südlich der Kreuzung (Kreisverkehr?) in Untermünstertal mit den vielen Varianten der 291. Ansonsten halt Busbahnhöfe/ZOBs wie z.B Freiburg und der nicht nach Richtungen aufgeteilte Teil der Schnewlinstraße.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
PPete2 (2021-02-17 08:27:52+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99434107 
For reasons see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98447156
osmviborg (2021-02-13 16:01:14+00:00): Når vejnavne er officielle kan de ses DAR. Dette har stadig status 2, altså 'Foreløbig', derfor bemærkningen.
parsd51 (2021-02-15 15:48:51+00:00): Ja, det gættede jeg på og du har ret, men skiltet er der, se evt. source. Så jeg synes ikke kommentaren vejleder i databasen (og nok forvirrer slutbrugere) og lyder i strid med de faktiske forhold.
Jørn-osm (2021-02-17 22:45:35+00:00): Dette vejnavn har været gældende siden den 12. februar.
Vælg periode (fra og til): 12.02.2021 til 12.02.2021 på denne side:
https://danmarksadresser.dk/adressedata/nye-vejnavne/

Citat "og ingen bygninger kommer til at få adresse på alleen." fra denne side:
https://tidende.dk/bornholm/preben-mortensens-alle-bliver-indviet-senere/102646
osmviborg (2021-02-18 10:08:21+00:00): @Jørn-osm. Og her status 2: https://info.aws.dk/darhistorik?entitet=navngivenvej&id=a0cb6ad3-6958-486e-b50c-a328dbaa1c57
PPete2 (2021-02-17 08:24:38+00:00): Reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99433843
For reasons see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98447156
fititnt (2023-04-23 00:07:57+00:00): Hello @Basstoelpel! I noticed that the towers you added duplicate the existing towers added by @BigKev97 from 2019. For example this <https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/8420710913> date 2021-02-11 compared to this <https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/6543785991> date 2019-06-12.

I commented on @BigKev97 here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71199530 . But I'm not as sure if which one is better to remove, so I'm asking opinion of both.
Basstoelpel (2023-04-29 08:55:51+00:00): I have cleaned up the mess. Sorry @BigKev97, it was easiest to delete your now orphaned towers, I think the newer ones have a slightly better position accuracy.

Baßtölpel
fititnt (2023-05-02 17:12:48+00:00): Thank you both!
NKA (2025-01-02 15:08:09+00:00): Slike er vel fortau (footway), ikke sykkelvei?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/899340675#map=19/67.290301/14.565331
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 12:17:08+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this. It looks good to me, thanks for updating this.
My only comment would be that you've left the tag of atm. If this isn't a bank then I assume there's no cash machine there now, so that could be removed.
Enock4seth (2021-08-05 08:58:57+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap, Please avoid island way/roads and without any primary tags. See https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/906841113 

And also use informative changeset comments in addition to the #######hashtags.
❤️‍🔥 (2021-02-18 06:42:58+00:00): just because this feels like a motorway doesn't make it a motorway. There are no signs which say "motorway" and there are no signs that say "🚷🚳". It is also not restricted entry. 

or has this changed in the past month? I doubt it has. 

Unless you've got a source for this, I'm going to revert this edit. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway for more information
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99219016
❤️‍🔥 (2021-02-19 04:11:10+00:00): This is not a motorway. There are no signs that "motorway", there are no 🚳🚷 signs, and it is not restricted access.
VincenzoWil (2021-02-17 22:57:59+00:00): Thank you for doing this! Where did you find the data to map it accurately?
reportingsjr (2021-02-18 02:55:36+00:00): @VincenzoWil Multiple sources. A good chunk of the times I hike the area to get a feel for the way everything is situated.

I use the OSIP 6in imagery background + strava heatmap to pretty accurately map roads, buildings, trails, etc.

strava heatmap can be used by setting a custom background with the following URL: https://heatmap-external-{switch:a,b,c}.strava.com/tiles-auth/all/red/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.png?Key-Pair-Id=REPLACE THIS&Signature=REPLACE THIS&Policy=REPLACE THIS

But, you need to log in to the strava global heatmap page, and then find the website cookie data that corresponds to those three REPLACE THIS sections of the url. And you have to redo that every like 2-3 weeks. Kind of annoying, but a great source of data!
reportingsjr (2021-02-18 02:56:23+00:00): Oh, and sometimes I'll use a pretty accurate bike GPS I have (wahoo elemnt bolt) and I'll upload the gpx from that after biking or hiking a trail.
VincenzoWil (2021-02-18 02:57:46+00:00): I never thought to use the Strava heatmap, that's ingenious! I've done a bit of mapping myself via bike, but given the terrain of Caldwell I was planning on a trip out to walk the trails myself with a GPS and try to map them all out. I really appreciate your work here!
reportingsjr (2021-02-18 03:00:11+00:00): There used to be this awesome tool that strava had called slide that let you use their data a little bit easier, but it's been broken for a couple of years unfortunately, hence the weird hacky method. :( 
 https://labs.strava.com/slide/

Glad you appreciate the work! I love knowing that people might have an easier time finding and figuring out trails from what I've done!
Luzandro (2021-04-14 18:23:12+00:00): Hallo,

was soll width=0 bei dem Verbindungsweg bedeuten?

Im Süden war dieser nicht mit dem Weg, sondern nur mit der Gemeindegrenze verbunden. Das habe ich korrigiert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906841920/history
Iratium (2021-04-23 09:45:47+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur, da hab ich die falsche Linie erwischt. Der Pfad ist nicht mal einen halben Meter breit aber ich konnte nur ganze Zahlen eintragen, da war 0 näher an der Wahrheit. Wie kann man das eintragen?
Luzandro (2021-04-23 11:31:28+00:00): Du kannst Punkt als Dezimaltrennzeichen verwenden, zB "0.5"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:width?uselang=de

Ich hab für den iD-Editor einen Bug-Report geschrieben
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8470
Iratium (2021-04-24 09:04:15+00:00): Vielen Dank für das Feedback und die Wiki Seite. Ich habe es nun durch est_width=0.4 ersetzt was wohl passender ist. Cheers!
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 12:23:22+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this, it looks good to me.
sdoerr (2021-02-17 11:52:46+00:00): Excellent: thanks!
Trevor_1 (2021-02-19 03:00:11+00:00): 👍
Warin61 (2021-02-14 23:17:29+00:00): HI,

3 errors in relationship roles - should be outers... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=148.10719&lat=-40.49454&zoom=12
dmgroom_ct (2021-02-16 20:16:04+00:00): Thank you, now corrected
muchichka_s (2021-02-13 17:00:09+00:00): Hello,
what's the point of this 🤔? I just read the local wiki and there are no relation requirements. So I leave polygon boders for the simplest villages. Am I making a mistake?
user_177389 (2021-02-13 17:44:27+00:00): Hello,

you didn't make a mistake, closed rings can also exist on their own.

But I've been scolded because wikidata supposedly only works with relations. (I don't know any better.) 

Best regards,
Mario
muchichka_s (2021-02-13 18:03:59+00:00): For example, this village is very close. I know for sure that Wikipedia is looking for OSM data through Wikidata and here everything works fine:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/905410333

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solowka

https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%B0

https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/uk:%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BA%D0%B0?uselang=uk#/map/0
user_177389 (2021-02-13 19:40:09+00:00): I took a look at it. Maybe wikidata works there because of the place node, which also has wikidata=Q714466: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/337600637

wikidata: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q714466

That explains the specification of the coordinates. Therefore the example may not be appropriate. (It's about wikidata directly, not wikipedia.)
muchichka_s (2021-02-13 21:12:00+00:00): I checked it, for village with a polygonal boundary without wikidata and a node with wikidata Wikipedia does not draw a border for it

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30698169
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/337658533
https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/uk:%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B0
https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%93%D0%B5%D1%87%D0%B0#/map/0
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 12:32:37+00:00): Hi,  you've requested a review of this change.
Couple of comments, when you add paths and roads, they need to connect to each other so that they can be routed along with directions. I've connected those paths for you here.
Also, on the path: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29734862
you've added a non-standard value for the surface. It's best to stick to the standard values so they can be understood by everything that uses the data, see here for commonly used values: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
eggie (2021-02-13 18:23:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-02-13 18:25:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
joost schouppe (2021-02-23 09:52:04+00:00): Thanks for the fix!
czubi (2021-02-14 15:22:13+00:00): Sag mir bitte nicht das du diese Hütte als Glockenturn getaggt hast ?!
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Dannheim?uselang=de#/media/File:Dannheim_-_17.jpg
itze79 (2021-02-14 15:30:03+00:00): Da sind 3 große Glocken drin! Nen Turm ist es natürlich nicht.
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 12:42:10+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this change.
Mostly looks good, thanks for adding these details.
Just wondering why you removed the name from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707296966 ?
You seem to have only just added it.

Also, when adding buildings it's best to give them square corners (right click and select square).
eggie (2021-02-13 18:30:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback...  Wegen kunnne uiteraard prive zijn. Dan is correct om dat te wijzigen.
Adresnode De Stichtse Rand 30b is helaas heel ergens ander terecht gekomen.
Waarschijnlijk is dat gebeurd door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Beter niet doen. 
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=99221966

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-02-13 18:42:55+00:00): Adresnode hersteld..  
unclassified omgezet naar track. 
MVG
eggie
Syl (2021-02-13 18:51:55+00:00): Bonjour, pour info des images de 2020 sont disponibles, je ne sais pas si cela peut aider ici (voir https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr-bzh/2021-January/002545.html)
hu9o (2021-02-14 17:38:29+00:00): Salut! C'est mieux de privilégier le format de numéro international :
+33 2 47 31 28 28
Bon! c'est vrai qu'on comprends et quelqu'un peut ensuite facilement le corriger.
Wapax (2021-02-14 17:39:24+00:00): Yo, pas de souci, je prends notes!
confusedbuffalo (2021-02-14 12:50:49+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of this change.
Thanks for adding this, it's always good to have up to date details of new developments.
Just a couple of things to note, first you should use "addr:housenumber" for the number (the address field with "123" in the background). You initially used name, then "addr:housename".
Also, best to add the street too.
In addition, it's good to square the corners of buildings (right click and select square).
I've been in and fixed those things for you here.

If the construction is now fully complete then you could change the construction area to a residential area.
Dawid2849 (2021-02-13 18:26:42+00:00): Dzięki. Sam chciałem to wycofać, ale widziałem, że liF coś jeszcze robił, a nie miałem czasu/chęci na weryfikację.
maraf24 (2021-02-14 19:27:08+00:00): Część jego zmian ręcznie wcześniej cofnął inny mapujący :)
puchaczowsky (2021-02-18 15:48:12+00:00): Autor dalej z uporem maniaka nieprawidłowo ujednolica węzły... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99462341
Dawid2849 (2021-02-18 16:14:45+00:00): Uh. Wycofam to za jakąś godzinę.
Dawid2849 (2021-02-18 18:13:42+00:00): Wycofane.
moreno96 (2021-02-13 18:07:04+00:00): سلام.
لطفا قبل از ادامه ویرایش نقشه، دستورالعمل های ویرایش که در سایت OpenStreetMap به زبان های انگلیسی و فارسی وجود دارن رو مطالعه کنید.
این بسته تغییرات شما دارای یک سری اشتباهات هست که بعدا میتونه مشکل ساز بشه
rab (2021-02-13 18:52:32+00:00): Hi,
when changing highway=construction you should always remove the construction=* tag. I would also recommend to re tag this roads only if you are 100% sure that construction work is finished. According to maxar imagery there are more roads to add (still in construction phase) . also there are some path ways that need to be removed. Please note to that once the construction tagging is removed, those areas that still need work are hard to identify.
rab (2021-02-13 19:07:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906888424
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/906888423
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99226479
ralley (2021-02-13 19:43:50+00:00): Please don't use the name field for descriptions like "shopping precinct", it is for proper names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99224106
user_11418917 (2021-02-16 17:28:42+00:00): Please stop adding spams. Thank you.
d1sr4n (2021-08-26 16:17:29+00:00): это священное озеро - место паломничества, или здесь просто хорошо щука клюет?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-13 19:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99227036 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits that broke political boundaries such as relation 11905590.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4753.
user_507893 (2021-02-13 18:27:57+00:00): Quelle: OSM Inspector
umki-baby (2021-02-13 18:33:01+00:00): @see  #99225057
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-13 19:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99227036 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits that broke political boundaries such as relation 11905590.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4753.
ian727 (2021-08-12 18:43:42+00:00): Tracks cannot be verified by sat imagery
lcmortensen (2021-03-03 03:19:16+00:00): This is not a motorway. There is no "motoway begins" sign, there are no restrictions on pedestrians and cyclists, and it still has private protery accesses off it
!bm (2021-02-13 22:32:20+00:00): Hallo fugufisch,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM!

Beachte bitte OSM-Grundlagen – ganz allgemein[1] und im konkreten Fall [2].

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben

Fehler entsprechend korrigiert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99232442

--besteGrüße!bm
fugufisch (2021-02-13 23:43:58+00:00): Vielen Dank! Werd ich mir merken.
BG
user_5359 (2021-02-14 05:12:38+00:00): Hello! Please use the english number format (decimal separator is a dot instead comma). I have correct this.
seattlefyi (2021-02-13 19:31:12+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Thanks for the edits - the only thing I'd ask about here is the access=no tag, since it implies it is off limits to the public. Perhaps there is a reason you added it? Thanks again!
Steven Benner (2021-02-13 19:43:14+00:00): I tried to set the "allowed access" properties in the web editor to only allow motor vehicles and it seems that the only way I could accomplish that was to set access=no and motor_vehicles=yes.

I'm not sure if it is a misunderstanding on my part or a quirk of the web editor. What value of the access (or related) tags would make sense for a drive-through?