piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Enock4seth (2021-07-14 01:43:41+00:00): Hello Genesis James, welcome to OpenStreetMap and happy you like it here. Thanks for your contributions. The name of the RC church probably is something like "St. Peters ...." not just  "Roman Catholic Church". I have made a quick change on which additional tags needs to have been added, see here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963215989. LearnOSM https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#basic-editing-with-id is a good starting resource
SekeRob (2021-11-27 14:35:23+00:00): Hi,

You mapped many power windmills where I live some 5 months ago. Many have the description 'dismantled' but to OSM and Osmose that's meaningless. If physically removed they need to be deleted or tagged in such a way they cause no errors. Some spots have 2 WMs. Unlikely. Anyway, if they are dismantled but to stay than the tag disused or abandoned=yes needs adding. Right now the system demands power=generator be added on some 50 of those. Does not look good.

cheers
gmar5 (2021-07-10 17:39:02+00:00): Hello. I think it is worth keeping 'Medley' as the toponym. It is the proper name of this place. The name of the manor farm, which derives from it, is already applied to the farmyard area object instead.
rising-mistake (2021-07-10 19:40:50+00:00): Heyo! I've never heard Medley applied to this farm, only ever the full name, I'm interested if you have a source? Either way, I defer to your good judgement so let's change it back. You can change it back or I can if you prefer?
gmar5 (2021-07-10 23:42:17+00:00): As far as I know, the name has been historically used for this location, for the fields and the associated part of the river -- the etymology should be that of a "middle island" (with an ending common to Binsey, Osney, Hinksey, -- or perhaps alternatively of a clearing/pasture, like in Iffley, Cowley, etc.?). Compared to those other toponyms, Medley is less commonly known or used today, because it lacks a proper settlement beyond what was its manor and is now the farm.
It might be considered slightly historical or obsolete, but today you can still see it used to name other local features like the footbridge, the sailing club, even chosen for the new beer-garden, and it is still commonly used by (at least some) people. (Maybe a few more others will from now on?). 

I don't have a proper reference at the moment, but this is one indicative example: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medley_Footbridge. An internet search will show others.

I will edit it back, thanks!

All the best.
alphensebezorger (2021-07-10 16:33:56+00:00): Hallo Cartographer10,

Volgens mij voldoen de busstroken in de Ir. van Muijlwijkstraat niet aan de omschrijving van highway=busway in de wiki. De stroken voor busverkeer zijn zo te zien alleen door verfstrepen aangegeven, niet door een berm o.i.d. van het overige verkeer gescheiden. Volgens mij is hier tagging met bus:lanes e.d. aangewezen, niet highway=busway/service. Zou jij de tagging van deze weggedeelten kunnen heroverwegen?
Vriendelijke groet, Alphensebezorger.
Cartographer10 (2021-07-10 16:47:06+00:00): Hallo Alphensebezorger,

Je hebt gelijk dat bijvoorbeeld beter busway=* of bus:lanes gebruikt kan worden. 

Voor mijn retag was de busbaan echter ook al los getekend, vandaar dat ik alleen de tagging heb aangepast. Wil je busway=* gebruiken dan moet de geometrie worden aangepast omdat de lijn dan met de gele lijnen moet worden gecombineerd. Aangezien er zoveel busroutes overheen lopen blijf ik daar liever vanaf. Daar heb ik geen ervaring mee.

Mvg,
Vincent
PT-53 (2021-07-11 06:30:19+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,
Du hast dieses Wegstück neu eingezeichnet. und u.a. mit den Merkmalen
highway=cycleway
construction=residential
versehen. Das paßt so nicht.

Wenn der Wegabschnitt noch im Bau und damit noch nicht nutzbar ist, wäre
highway=construction
constrution=* (z.B. path oder cycleway)
die richtige Merkmal-Kombination.

Sollte der Wegabschnitt bereits nutzbar sein, müßte das Merkmal
construction=residential
noch gelöscht werden.

Der Wegabschnitt wird von 2 Pollern begrenzt. Bei diesen hast Du angegeben, daß der Weg nur von Fußgänger und Radfahrern benutzt werden darf. Dann ist
highway=cycleway falsch. Richtig wäre highway=path.

Bei einem Poller gilt 
access=no +
foot=yes +
bicyle=yes
als Standartwert und braucht nicht expliziet eingetragen zu werden.
Bei einem Path gelten
motor_vehicle=no +
foot=yes +
bicyle=yes
als impliziert.

Ist reiten da wirklich verboten ?

Wikis:
Path: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath
Cycleway: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=cycleway?uselang=de
Poller: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
Access_restrictions: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Bitte berichtige Deine Eingaben entsprechend. Auch solltest Du Dich etwas mehr mit dem Wiki beschäftigen.

Grüße
ChrisFromRV (2021-07-11 08:58:22+00:00): Wird erledigt.
PT-53 (2021-07-11 12:08:02+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV, 
Du hast jetzt einer der beiden Poller gelöscht und den anderen umgestellt auf
barrier=cycle_barrier   +
bicycle=no

Warum bicycle no? Kommt man da mit dem Rad (schiebend) nicht durch ?

Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier=cycle%20barrier?uselang=de

Bitte schaue Dir das Wiki nochmal an.

Grüße
Akkurator (2021-08-18 00:29:55+00:00): Auch wird die südliche Hälfte dieses Weges nach Fertigstellung sicher kein highway=residential, sondern bestenfalls wieder Rad/Fußweg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27452673
S.a. https://publish.cmcitymedia.de/news/getFile.php?id=1235906599&id2=991615&id3=15115&file=73369-1609165994-1.pdf
DaveF (2021-07-10 15:49:02+00:00): Hi
There can't be different highway grades for individual lanes of the same road
The route relations have been split at the junction. Could you take a look please.
foxysrider (2021-07-10 16:53:38+00:00): the jct of Charlton Rd/Lodge Cswy - oops my bad sorry
eggie (2021-07-10 15:18:04+00:00): Hoi,

Kijk nog even naar het voorbeeld 



access:conditional=no @ (2021 Jan 20-2021 Apr 3) 

Dus access:conditional als key
en na het = teken de value.

Kijk je nog even?
Dit zijn je edits nu http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107750870
Gr eggie
PierZen (2021-12-28 02:43:01+00:00): deleted micro artefacts, not  buildings 

note @hotosm-project-11016 #MissingValidation and new mappers support.
datendelphin (2021-07-26 17:55:47+00:00): Was genau möchtest du hier einzeichnen? highway=bus gibt es nicht.
B3ll3r0ph0nt3s (2021-08-07 08:25:58+00:00): Eine nur für Bus und Velos befahrbare Strasse, ich kann sonst ein Foto verlinken.
syntex (2021-09-15 01:41:00+00:00): Błędne zmiany, te drogi nie zostały jeszcze otwarte
Kaziu Kisiel (2021-07-10 15:48:12+00:00): Napisałem "Obwodnica" w cudzysłowiu (za co ja przepraszam), ponieważ sugerowałem się opiniami niektórych, że obecnie się budująca DW 801 biegnie, mówiąc przysłowiowo, przez miasto.
maraf24 (2021-07-10 20:36:22+00:00): Nazwa jeszcze nie pasuje: "Projektowany nowy przebieg drogi wojewódzkiej nr 801 (DW801) przez Dęblin"
Poza tym to w ogóle nie jest nazwa, tylko opis.
woodpeck (2021-07-14 18:09:45+00:00): Hallo rantto - wenn ein Parkplatz nur für Anwohner gedacht ist, dann setze ihn doch auf access=private oder access=residents, statt ihn zu löschen.
Enock4seth (2021-07-12 23:19:59+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. I have reviewed and make changes. LearnOSM https://learnosm.org is a great resource for getting started to OpenStreetMap
eggie (2021-07-10 16:44:19+00:00): De format klopt nu, maar waarom =private ipv =no op het zuidelijke stuk? 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107752592

Dit is toch gewoon openbare weg?
Gr eggie
Jffry101 (2021-07-10 17:12:07+00:00): De feitelijke situatie is dat er een tijdelijke bypass ligt ter hoogte van de vluchtheuvel bij de ingang richting het sorteercentrum. Vanaf de rotonde Sierenborch staat een bord C1 (verboden in te rijden), met onderbord met uitzondering van PostNL. Personeel en laad-losverkeer wordt via de bypass geleid. Door dit enige segment op deze manier te taggen, verwacht ik dat de routering mogelijk blijft. 

Mocht dit anders moeten/kunnen/horen, dan hoor ik dat uiteraard graag
eggie (2021-07-10 17:31:35+00:00): Oke Een lastige  Je kunt gewoon de bypass intekenen wanneer dat lang gaat duren. 

C1 
vehicle=no
horse=no

en dan evt.
motor_vehicle=destination
voor de uitzondering.
Op de hoofdrijbaan zou je denk ik beter = no  kunnen taggen ipv private. 
Maar voor een buitenstaander lastig.. Up to the local mapper en dat ben jij :)
gr eggie
DaveF (2021-07-10 16:46:50+00:00): Hi
What's this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8909951942#map=16/51.4717/-2.5324
DaveF (2021-07-10 17:06:30+00:00): OK, got it
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963239145
A bit surprised to see a whole new school!
DaveF (2021-07-10 17:39:52+00:00): I've updated the area as best from aerial imagery, but if you've local knowledge, please amend. 
Does it have an entrance from the recreation ground?
DaveF (2021-07-10 17:54:59+00:00): Do you know if the infants school has expanded into the old junior site, as I've preliminary mapped?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198069177
WoodWoseWulf (2021-07-10 23:44:00+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This is a collaborative volunteer project intended to create an accurate map that anyone can use.

Please do not add fictional features to the map.
PierZen (2021-12-28 02:50:05+00:00): deleted micro artefacts, not  buildings 

note @hotosm-project-11016 #MissingValidation and new mappers support.
user_5359 (2021-07-11 09:38:58+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8909981555/history . What st the meaning of your non standard OSM keys?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SGorskiy (2021-07-19 11:00:37+00:00): Памятник на самом деле отсутствует? Судя по космоснимкам он все ещё присутствует. 
От куда источник?
Uralla (2021-07-19 14:04:34+00:00): Его снесли на прошлой неделе. Есть фотки.
SGorskiy (2021-07-21 14:05:53+00:00): А, отлично. Спасибо.
PierZen (2021-12-28 02:58:43+00:00): deleted micro artefacts, not buildings 

@hotosm-project-11016 Buildings Validation needed
AndersAndersson (2021-07-12 05:01:21+00:00): Hello
What kind of error did you try to fix?
ndm (2021-07-26 23:15:46+00:00): Not sure that the "sidewalk=separate" is really true - sure you've drawn it as a separate way - but in reality there's nothing between the sidewalk and the road. You can cross anywhere. More detail's great but in this case it's likely to confuse pedestrian routers?
cryptickryptos (2021-07-27 10:41:34+00:00): sidewalk=separate doesn't seem to be specifically for sidewalks physically separated from the street but for any drawn separately, at least not according to the wiki. From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk "This road has sidewalks but these are mapped using separate ways."

Routing on separately drawn sidewalks seems to work okay for me, as long as crossings are mapped as well (I've actually missed a couple here, I'll add those). Considering those are mapped, the router will (or should) preemptively cross to the right side of the street for the user. Otherwise, to me it seems it should be up to user discretion when to cross, which doesn't seem too different to the alternative method of tagging sidewalks where the router simply doesn't tell the user to cross until the street intersects.

I'm currently trying out mapping like this because of the newer aerial imagery that allows for detailed mapping like this, but I don't want to accidentally break routing in the areas I map. The lack of street names when routing on separately drawn sidewalks is a noticeable issue that could probably be fixed with some tagging, however there doesn't seem to be any current consensus on how to remedy this. If you can see any other issues with it, feel free to let me know
Dino Michelini (2021-07-10 17:03:53+00:00): La posizione va verificata
giuseppemari (2021-07-11 06:48:29+00:00): È una sorgente dell aniene che forma una piccola cascata, credo vada cambiata con sorgente.
axelr (2021-07-14 15:11:54+00:00): Solche Änderungen sind überflüssig. Ein highway=bus_stop ist eine vollständige Haltestelle. Siehe public_transport-proposal.
wireguy (2021-07-10 19:46:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM EY03!  Great comment on the change.  The outline of the house needs to be tighter though.  I made the house outline more exact, and added a few other houses on the street.  Take a look, ask if you have any q's, and keep mapping!
Super-Map (2021-07-28 09:39:43+00:00): Thanks to have made this change for the way: "329740483"... but, did you see the result on the map????! Like (too) many contributors you, apparently, haven't yet understood this project... it's a pity! 6 years after "the change".
Super-Map (2021-07-28 09:41:51+00:00): And did you see around those roads? This is MY WORK!.......................................................... No more comment, but you know so much: "it's an open project"! Open have never been to accepted all... precisely like in "real life"
Kalaallit Nunaat (2021-07-28 09:52:57+00:00): Bonjour, je ne comprends pas quelles sont vos récriminations. Si vous voulez m'interpeller faites le français puisque la zone sur laquelle cela semble être un problème est en France.
Cordialement.
Super-Map (2021-07-28 12:18:58+00:00): So, I know! I know "perfectly" what I'm doing! And one more time for like other "persons" I'm not a teacher an,d don't expect something like this from "me"... This project is "open" with a "no profit spirit", because... there is several "goal" and it isn't one project only. Have a nice day. P.S.: "working badly" it's spent lot of money too the been!... If someone make something wrong since years, you haven't the need to do the same by "friendship"!... Extremely the same in the real life.
Super-Map (2021-07-28 12:20:52+00:00): To the "bin", as you can see we do all "mistakes".
◪ Jarv (2021-07-11 12:10:30+00:00): Hi Mark, how is the dog access restricted? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:dog
If you follow this guide it will say what to tag the paths or park as.
Hope that helps.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107756006
◪ Jarv (2021-07-11 12:05:55+00:00): Hi Mark, these ways are correctly tagged to have contra-flow cycle traffic. If there are marked contra-flow lanes (i.e. a painted line on the ground to segregate contra-flow cycle traffic) from with-flow traffic then you can add "cycleway:right=lane"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107756080
A67-A67 (2021-07-10 17:51:29+00:00): Dit eenrichtingsverkeer geldt niet voor (brom)fietsers en bussen volgens de bron. Ik heb die uitzonderingen toegevoegd.
eggie (2021-07-10 17:53:46+00:00): Dag Tommy,

Prima om de zaak actueel te maken, maar de routering voor OV en tweewielers en daarmee ook alle routerelaties zijn hier stuk gegaan. Routeren doet het niet meer.
Gelukkig heeft een ervaren mapper het al opgepakt en de schade gerepareerd.
Er geldt hier een uitzondering op eenrichting voor tweewielers en OV
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107757193

MVG
eggie
◪ Jarv (2021-07-11 12:08:15+00:00): Hi Mark, this change set seems to be okay at face value, however "incline" tag is usually set to up/down (going forward on the way), or  it can be set to a % of the incline or decent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107756321
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
ovruni (2021-07-10 22:29:10+00:00): Hola, en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se ha agregado el valor de nombre a códigos de referencia que van en ref [0], los cuales ya existen en varias vías.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref
Jakka (2021-07-11 09:36:59+00:00): Indien mogelijk wat meer info eraan te koppelen.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107758075
Vascom (2021-07-13 03:43:37+00:00): Привет.
Велодорожка вдоль Москвы-реки обозначена соответствующими знаками?
Пешеходам же там тоже можно ходить?
EugeniyKH (2021-07-14 08:42:49+00:00): Да, там велопешеходная дорожка, по документации на строительство и по понятиям.  Поменял .  Знаков нет, поставят или нет неизвестно(а если и поставят, то их поломают быстро). Строительство продолжается дальше вверх и вниз по реке и конца не видно.
DressyPear4 (2021-07-11 15:45:13+00:00): Adicionar esse monte de tags não é correto.
Não mapeie apenas para spaw de pokemon.
Qualquer edição deste tipo será removia.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107758343
◪ Jarv (2021-07-11 11:52:41+00:00): In this change set you have appeared to of deleted some ways only to replace them like-for-like with less tags. Could you explain why you have done this? This ultimately removed the 18+ versions of history of these ways and made tagging worse. It would also break any relations that used those ways such as bus & cycle routes as well as banned turns. 
Also in this change set you have replaced mini roundabouts with regular roundabouts, this is incorrect.

example way replacement: 8134667 -> 963253266
example roundabout: n/243880847 -> w/963253259
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107758716
Ze0zohk1 (2021-08-08 12:21:40+00:00): Hallo Skifan,

wieso hast du building=cabin gelöscht? Nur weil das eine Schutzhütte ist, heißt das nicht, dass das kein Gebäude sein kann. Im Gegenteil: Mir ist kein Berghüte (tourism=alpine_hut) bekannt, die kein Gebäude wäre. 

Du schreibst, dass es eine Schutzhütte sei. Dann ist aber tourism=alpine_hut falsch. Eine Berghütte muss zwingend Übernachtungsplätze und Essen anbieten. Und es muss permanent ein Hüttenwart präsent sein, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut.

Ich war mal vor Ort, erinnere mich aber nicht mehr an die Hütte. Wenn das eine verschlossene Waldhütte mit Vordach ist, frag ich mich, ob man die überhaupt als shelter taggen will. Schau dir mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type an. (Ich tagge solche Hütten dann nicht als shelter bzw. teile das Gebäude in zwei Teile, aber das geht zu weit, das hier zu erklären).

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
Skifan (2021-08-08 14:38:30+00:00): Hey Ze0zohk1, 
hier ist mir tatsächlich ein Fehler unterlaufen. Die Angabe tourism=alpine_hut ist natürlich falsch. Habe es zurückgeändert. 
Ich werde mir die Hütte bei Gelegenheit nochmal näher anschauen.
Viele Grüße Skifan
Ze0zohk1 (2021-08-08 14:40:19+00:00): Super, danke dir Skifan
gileri (2021-07-10 20:06:28+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour cette contribution !

Nous n'avons pas la permission en tant que contributeurs d'utiliser les données du site du promoteur :

La structure générale, ainsi que les logiciels, textes, images animées ou fixes, sons, savoir-faire, dessins, graphismes et tout autre élément composant le site web sont la propriété exclusive de COVALENS.
Toute représentation totale ou partielle de ce site par quelque procédé que ce soit, sans l'autorisation expresse de COVALENS, est interdite et constituerait une contrefaçon sanctionnée par les articles L.335-2 et suivants du Code de la propriété intellectuelle.

https://www.cogedim.com/mentions-legales.html

Pour ces modifications il faut donc utiliser d'autres sources comme le cadastre, ou les images aériennes autorisées.

Bonne journée !

Éric
openblop (2021-07-10 20:13:34+00:00): Bonjour Eric, La zone de construction est bien présente sur place mais les batiments ne sont pas encore sortis de terre. Dans ce cas, je laisse juste la zone globale de construction ? Bien visible depuis la rue ( la limite des bâtiments est matérialisée sur le site de construction par des petits drapeaux pour les fondations)
gileri (2021-07-10 21:59:40+00:00): Oui je pense que c'est parfait de laisser la zone de construction en attendant. Merci :)
openblop (2021-07-11 07:01:30+00:00): Merci pour votre vigilance et les conseils :)
ftcat (2021-07-11 05:01:02+00:00): Hi  uliwanne,

Please don't map the outline of every field with a track, there are no tracks around these fields. Also some of the streams you are mapping are running in the wrong directions and do not commence at the very end of the wetlands they run in but usually some way down. I don't think the purpose of hotosm-project-10106 is to map waterways in any case. Making repairs to incorrect waterway mapping is extremely time consuming.

I would appreciate if you would take this advice into consideration.

Thanks
eggie (2021-07-10 20:19:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
kartonage (2021-07-11 05:51:44+00:00): Hej and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

quick information for you: waterways 
 for water flow do not need additional "natural=water" tags. These are for closed ways / area objects only. For more information see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway

Best regards
VictorIE (2021-12-05 06:42:47+00:00): Boundary is problematic at Ballymun Road https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12938481/history#map=17/53.38048/-6.26423
eggie (2021-07-10 20:24:53+00:00): Dag Onno... Svp niet dubbeltaggen
Volgens de laatste afspraken taggen we de naam van de school op de adresnode met amenity=schoolen name= ... 
Het schoolterrein dan zonder naam en landuse=education toevoegen.
Zodra dat rendert verwijderen we amenity=school.
Kijk je nog even. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-10 20:29:03+00:00): Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Deducation
eggie (2021-07-10 20:38:30+00:00): Dubbele naam en adres heb ik verwijderd..  Alle info staat op de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Onno Zweers (2021-07-10 21:32:39+00:00): Beste Eggie, bedankt voor de correctie! Mvg, Onno
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:43:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725542 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IranReverts (2021-11-13 10:34:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725333 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import