piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sovereign_ch (2019-05-16 11:58:22+00:00): Das spielt überhaupt keine Rolle ob die "amenity"-Eigenschaften auf einem Gebäudepolygon erfasst sind oder nicht. Die gehören in der Regel auf ein Areal oder eine Relation und nicht auf ein einzelnes Gebäude. Und schon gar nicht wie hier blind auf einen ganzen Block getaggt. Das gilt auch für andere Objekte, die in Zürich so getaggt sind.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:56:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:56:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
viloan (2019-05-14 12:24:15+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-05-25 16:34:40+00:00): Hi,
what do these two tags mean?
Zero-dechets   -> maybe bulk_purchase = yes?  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bulk_purchase

magasin à la ferme -> maybe shop = farm ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfarm
Hjart (2019-05-14 16:36:29+00:00): Isn't a bridge. More like a culvert
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-14 17:17:15+00:00): thanks for cleaning these. my bad. didn't notice they were duplicated and not actually updating them.
Aglis IRM-ED (2019-05-15 01:54:05+00:00): hi, why did you change this road into unclassified? I think this road is residential, its more appropriate. thank you
pittrichimica (2019-05-15 04:17:11+00:00): Good morning,
thanks for your comment.
As you can see from the OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential ,
the tag residential should not be used for roads connecting small settlements.
Why do you think that the residential tag is more appropriate? Have you locally seen any traffic calming feature or explicit speed limit sign? Then indeed one should tag residential.
Best regards
trigpoint (2019-05-16 11:40:39+00:00): Hi, are you sure that this is a publicly accessible residential road. Imagery (kerbs crossed and colour) suggests that this is a private shared driveway. The name Drover's Close is another indicator that should be taken into account.
Cheers Phil
yaswap (2019-05-16 15:44:42+00:00): Hi Phill,

Thanks for looking into the edit. Our editor drew the road segment and added residential tag as per the OSM wiki of highway=residential and as per  "driveway" OSM wiki this was mentioned in it "It is rare for a driveway to be the way to access another roadway." May be it is different from region to region.

Please suggest if there is anything that gives clarity for the road classification in these kind of scenarios.

Regards,
yaswap.
trigpoint (2019-05-19 14:58:44+00:00): There are several thing here that gives clues.
A trend in modern housing estates is private shared driveways/parking areas. Generally this is what I am seeing based on experience of seeing these on the ground. 
The big indicators I can see on imagery is that the kerbs are crossed, indicating that this is not a public adopted highway. 
This is new build, it has not existed long enough for infill, if this was intended to be public highway then turning areas at the end of Rowan Road and Drover's Close would not have been provided. Close in a name indicated that it is not a through road.
As for a driveway being a way to access another roadway, then this isn't. It should only be used if you have business at those properties, in that case there is a choice of entry/exit. If you need to travel from Rowan Road to Drover's Close then you should do so via Goldworkings Crescent.
The other thing to take into account is OSM history, this area was mapped by local mappers by survey and we tend to ignore private driveways as they have little interest to the majority of map users. Had this been a residential road I am pretty sure they would have mapped it, again its newbuild so would have been built at the same time as Drover's Close and Rowan Road.
For now at least, I would err on the side of caution and map this as private. By all means add a note to prompt a local mapper to go and have a look what it really is. In fact the Optimus Way link is due another survey so will have a look in the next few weeks if someone hasn't beaten me to it.
BTW I was the first mapper to map this estate, Birch Lane from Kirby Road.
Hope this helps Phil
trigpoint (2019-05-19 15:06:15+00:00): Although spending a bit of time looking through the history, changeset comments can be quite helpful.
It is also important to consider why something is not mapped in a well mapped residential area.
Cheers Phil
yaswap (2019-05-21 12:51:36+00:00): Hi Phil,

Thanks for responding back. That really helps. We will change the part of the road to driveway as you mentioned and add private access.

Please let us know if there is anything else that can improve the edit.

Regards,
yaswap.
trigpoint (2019-06-16 20:23:58+00:00): A bit of a followup
This was taken looking from Rowan Road.
http://trigpoint.myzen.co.uk/photodump/RowanRoad.jpg
It is clearly a shared parking/access area for those properties. Its is clearly not a public highway.
And for completeness from Drovers Close

HTH Phil
yaswap (2019-07-09 14:03:24+00:00): Hi Phil

Thanks for the updates. That's really helpful.

Regard,
yaswap
Vinber-Pro (2019-05-18 15:05:23+00:00): Bonjour,
sur ces magasins à la ferme, peut-être peut-on ajouter les horaires ?
tux67 (2019-05-14 13:20:33+00:00): Hi, der Klarheit halber sollten die Wege hinter dem Gate noch mit einem Access Tag versehen werden , wenn der Zugang beschränkt ist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70232702
Jrachi (2019-05-20 15:43:52+00:00): Hai inserito La Torretta sia come way che come punto. Consiglio di cancellarne una.
Hai usato il campo note per inserire delle informazioni che si possono mettere in tag separati. Guarda come li ho corretti.
Sul tag note si dovrebbero riportare note in inglese. Per le note in italiano si deve usare note:it.
In generale o visto che stai facendo un buon lavoro. Continua così
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-14 13:01:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 70126489, 70126506, 70126544.
viloan (2019-05-14 12:58:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Svalbard (2019-05-14 20:19:16+00:00): Hallo spockibaba, „path“ beinhaltet mindestens bereits „foot=yes“. Es ist nicht erforderlich, das zusätzlich anzugeben. Es ist auch nicht erforderlich, alle möglichen Fortbewegungsmittel, die nicht möglich sind, anzugeben, bloß weil JOSM sie ggf. als Optionen anbietet. Bitte entferne ski, snowmobile etc. wieder. Vielen Dank! Gruß Svalbard
Svalbard (2019-05-14 20:28:11+00:00): Hallo spockibaba, bei dem von Dir ursprünglich als path eingetragenen Weg handelt es sich um keinen track. Ich habe mir den Weg am 13.05.2019 angesehen. Das ist ein reiner Trampelpfad. Bitte beschäftigte Dich mit dem Wiki bzgl. der Klassifizierung von Wegen etc. Track findest Du hier [1] Vielen Dank! Gruß Svalbard

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Sosha1996 (2019-05-21 19:45:49+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف داده‌هایی از نقشه کردید(POI). این داده‌ها ظاهرا در نقشه وجود داره و شما نباید اون‌ها رو حذف میکردید.
همچنین شما در تعدادی از چنجست‌هاتون پیام‌های کاربران رو نادیده میگیرید.
در کامنت چنجست شما باید توضیحاتی متناسب با تغییراتی که ایجاد کردید بنویسید. این که در کامنت چنجست بنویسید «آپلود» اشتباهه و غیر قابل پذیرش.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

لیست چنجست‌هایی که شما در آن خراب‌کاری نموده‌اید:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

سوشا
از OSM Iran
———————————————
You are attempting to delete map POIs.

Please also use meaningful change comments and answer people.

The list of changes that you sabotaged:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

Sosha
form OSM Iran.
Sosha1996 (2019-05-21 19:45:51+00:00): شما اقدام به حذف داده‌هایی از نقشه کردید(POI). این داده‌ها ظاهرا در نقشه وجود داره و شما نباید اون‌ها رو حذف میکردید.
همچنین شما در تعدادی از چنجست‌هاتون پیام‌های کاربران رو نادیده میگیرید.
در کامنت چنجست شما باید توضیحاتی متناسب با تغییراتی که ایجاد کردید بنویسید. این که در کامنت چنجست بنویسید «آپلود» اشتباهه و غیر قابل پذیرش.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

لیست چنجست‌هایی که شما در آن خراب‌کاری نموده‌اید:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

سوشا
از OSM Iran
———————————————
You are attempting to delete map POIs.

Please also use meaningful change comments and answer people.

The list of changes that you sabotaged:
70354847, 70430868, 70355839, 70354816, 70327285, 70260741, 70233853, 70233803, 70229251, 70229236, 70229206, 70228256, 70227355, 70227080, 70188238, 70160146, 70160107, 70160097, 70155425, 70155350, 70227272, 70066473, 69977327, 69977255, 69975055, 69974963, 69974945, 69974893, 69946480, 69935097, 69932873, 69898613, 69946396, 69858916, 69855366, 69845644, 69844807, 69841878, 69836530, 69483047

Sosha
form OSM Iran.
ebraplmap (2019-05-24 16:47:53+00:00): Please leave a comment to explain why you are deleting POI data, with a link as a proof of that.
Leo Slager (2019-05-14 15:00:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
viloan (2019-05-14 13:20:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
MillyHennayake (2019-05-14 18:08:41+00:00): #arup #arupleeds
abakus_uploader (2019-05-14 22:33:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Polarbear (2019-10-03 22:07:06+00:00): Hi rwst, danke für deine Arbeit an den LSGs. 
Noch genauer bekommst du das hin, wenn du dir aus dem Geoportal Berlin den Layer "Schutzgebiete nach Naturschutzrecht" direkt als WMS in den JOSM legst. Ich habe im Erpetal mal angefangen, das zu verfeinern. 
Nicht so ideal fand ich die Löschung der beiden natural=* Objekte, nur weil die Tags nicht passen. Auch im LSG gibt es ja Nutzungen und natürliche Bodenbedeckung.
Ich habe die wiederhergestellt und werde sie aber in Wald und Grasland auftrennen. 
Weisst du wie feucht die Wiese dort ist (ggf wetland?)
rwst (2019-10-04 05:33:11+00:00): Keine Ahnung, nie dagewesen. Die ersten LSGs waren per Hand, und wollte die am Ende nicht nochmal durchgehen. Danke für die Korrekturen!
canfe (2019-05-19 16:32:01+00:00): valore inusuale di {0.key}: il metro è l’unità di misura predefinita; il separatore decimale è il punto; se aggiungi l’unità di misura, inserisci uno spazio poi l’unità 
valore inusuale di height: il metro è l’unità di misura predefinita; il separatore decimale è il punto; se aggiungi l’unità di misura, inserisci uno spazio poi l’unità

Ecco quanto riporta OSMOSE. Correggere.
Ryzen (2019-05-14 14:05:17+00:00): Dear ma5ter,

the Cabugao Lake seems to have been more correct before your change: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70236153
Are your aware that Bing imagery can be severely offsetted?
ma5ter (2019-05-14 14:59:51+00:00): Dear Ryzen
Thanks for the comment. Of cause I know of the offset so I use gpx tracks I got week ago kayaking around Coron bay and the island
Dimacn (2019-05-14 17:32:58+00:00): Не следует давать объектам описательные названия типа "здание" и "склад". Такие характеристики задаются тегами объекта. В name пишем только официальное название https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name   Пожалуйста исправьте
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 16:41:32+00:00): Hello,
It looks like your access change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678672691/history has the same issue as was previously described at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71681165 .  Can you have a look at where you've added motor_vehicle=yes elsewhere without evidence and remove it?
Best Regards,
Andy
singhyyd (2019-07-05 17:34:09+00:00): Hi Andy,

Thanks for your response. Reverted the "motor_vehicle=yes” attribute added to unmaintained track road as per the request.

Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71940418

Let me know if you have anymore suggestions.

Regards, 
singhyyd
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 19:41:14+00:00): Thanks.  There are a few others to have a look at - see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/KvA for those that you were the last editor of.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-05-21 15:38:36+00:00): Você deletou o ponto da cidade de Apicum Açu. Mais atençao!
viloan (2019-05-14 14:22:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
FredrikLindseth (2019-05-14 14:22:30+00:00): This was suposed to have the comment "removing bus stops in Olav Kyrres gate and closing misc notes"
Kartenziegel (2019-05-14 14:31:09+00:00): Seychellen oder wo bearbeitest du gerade?
smarties (2019-05-15 11:10:07+00:00): Moin Kartenziegel, nur "Poivre Islands". Da hatte ich gerade Bock drauf. Jetzt mappe ich in einem anderem Land. Gruß smarties
Nakaner (2019-12-28 15:10:41+00:00): Hallo Konkon153,

in diesem Änderungssatz hast du in einem Teil von Mölln bei zahlreichen Gebäuden die Adressen ergänzt. Warum hast du in diesem Änderungssatz das Gebäude Pommernweg 49a/b () gelöscht? Hat das einen höheren Sinn? Unter http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70237582 kannst du dir eine graphische Darstellung der Änderungen dieses Änderungssatzes anzeigen.

Könntest du das Gebäude bitte wiederherstellen?

Bitte beachte beim Mappen in OSM, dass die Luftbilder nicht die beste Quelle für wahre und korrekte Informationen sind. Luftbilder sind fast immer veraltet. Wenn du ein Objekt in OSM findest, das du auf keinem für OSM freigegebenen Luftbild finden kannst, sollten die Alarmglocken schellen und du dich fragen, ob du dem Luftbild noch trauen kannst (außer das Objekt ist sehr alt und du bist dir sicher, dass das Luftbild jünger ist). Siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Nicht_von_veralteten_Luftbildern_abzeichnen

Viele Grüße

Michael
Sosha1996 (2019-05-17 23:07:56+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست ننویسید «ماکسیم». در کامنت چنجست باید توضیحاتی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments
Sosha1996 (2019-05-17 23:07:58+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست ننویسید «ماکسیم». در کامنت چنجست باید توضیحاتی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments
gscholz (2019-05-21 04:55:36+00:00): Hi Jozeban,
your ecent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-99.05592&lat=19.60810&zoom=15&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Saludos
Guido
4004 (2019-05-19 20:19:26+00:00): hi,
this isn't how we tag buildings here - entrances are associated to a building, but don't have an address of their own. and it's flats, not units
PantherStrix (2019-05-20 00:46:49+00:00): hello,
I changed/corrected it, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70423017
Lejun (2024-05-01 05:34:14+00:00): J'suis en train de faire un peu de ménage régional. Si t'as d'autres horaires du même type je t'invite à les corriger <3
gscholz (2019-05-21 04:56:46+00:00): Hi Jozeban,
your ecent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-99.05592&lat=19.60810&zoom=15&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Saludos
Guido
czubi (2021-03-13 12:39:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2574660#map=17/50.69166/10.98485&layers=N
Palolo (2019-06-26 03:49:08+00:00): Thank you for helping with this project. Please note that we need to accurately map the buildings with square corners. The instructions show how.
Palolo (2019-08-28 03:47:13+00:00): Please map each building individually and accurately. Building size is important for population metrics.
Dimacn (2019-05-14 17:38:14+00:00): Прекратите вандализм. Все ваши правки будут отменены до изначального состояния.
Constable (2019-05-20 14:46:39+00:00): Ciao, benvenuta su OSM. Qual è la fonte per queste strade? stando alle immagini aeree disponibili non sembra proprio che esistano
Maria Vittoria R (2019-05-20 14:57:27+00:00): Ciao!
In realtà esistono, sono piccole strade sterrate o sentieri che passano nel bosco e quindi dalle foto aeree non sono rilevabili in quanto nascoste dal fogliame (sono stata lì diverse volte negli ultimi mesi).
L'errore nella tipologia di strada assegnategli è dovuto alla fretta.
Constable (2019-05-24 07:50:21+00:00): ciao, grazie per la risposta. Comprendo la tua risposta ma non la capisco; se non si ha tempo di fare un buon lavoro conviene rimandare, non modificare la mappa inserendo una strada residenziale asfaltata nel mezzo di un "bosco". Non è il modo corretto di approcciarsi al progetto; le modifiche che si fanno alla mappa diventano immediatamente pubbliche, quindi da 10 giorni chi guarda questo punto della mappa vede quelle strade. Ora sono passati altri quattro giorni e non hai ancora avuto modo/interesse di correggere, deduco che contribuire al progetto non sia esattamente tra le tue priorità. Abbiamo tutti una vita a cui dedicarci ma inserire (coscientemente) dati sbagliati sulla mappa non mi sembra una bella mossa.
Provvedo a correggere basandomi sulle immagini aeree disponibili; se poi vorrai apportare modifiche sarai la benvenuta
Grazie, ciao
maraf24 (2019-05-20 11:53:44+00:00): Track znajduje w nieco innym miejscu, co dobrze widać na ortofotomapie z Geoportalu.
Poprawiłem.