piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ralley (2019-08-25 03:22:33+00:00): What is your source for these changes?  They do not appear to be supported by aerial imagery and your changeset description gives no information on the change or it's source.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-25 09:22:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73712820 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake data in New Zealand. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3034 , 3037 and 3122.
tux67 (2019-08-25 12:06:48+00:00): Habs nochmal angepasst - jetzt sollte es dem Schild entsprechen:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=vAPCJh2L1ewYWKJqdpOlEQ&focus=photo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73708291
aixbrick (2019-08-25 20:06:03+00:00): Das hgv=designated muss aber doch auch raus, oder?
tux67 (2019-08-25 20:40:23+00:00): Hi, Jau ... Das stimmt wohl ... Danke für den Hinweis ...
RudiPohlen (2019-08-26 09:35:50+00:00): Wenn ich OSM routen lasse, führt er aber noch immer falsch. Ab wann werden die Änderungen den wirksam ?
Als Startpunkt wähle ich einfach einen Punkt etwas unterhalb und als Endpukt einen auf der Geneikener Straße.
Sollten die Änderungen hier nicht nach kurzer Zeit wirksam sein ?
tux67 (2019-08-26 10:19:53+00:00): Nach meiner Erfahrung dauert das ein Weilchen. Osmand mit Live update routet aber hier schon wieder für Auto.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73708291
RudiPohlen (2019-08-26 10:55:27+00:00): Hmmm, ok, dann liegt das sicher am hier verwendeten Routingdienst, der die Änderungen noch nicht übernommen hat, weil auf openstreetmap.org wird immer noch falsch geroutet.Sowohl mit OSRM, als auch  GraphHopper
user_5359 (2019-08-25 05:27:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
ovruni (2019-08-25 16:35:34+00:00): Hola
He cambiado los elementos que contienen "sport=football" a "sport=soccer". Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Football
Saludos
zzanzare (2019-08-25 11:12:53+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions, but please make sure you chose the correct marker - don't use artwork for everything. And don't place them in the middle of the road.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-14 23:03:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78418905 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some mechanical edits involving 'subway'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3277 and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/77145512 for an explanation why there is a problem with this change.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-14 23:03:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78418905 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some mechanical edits involving 'subway'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3277 and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/77145512 for an explanation why there is a problem with this change.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-14 23:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78418905 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some mechanical edits involving 'subway'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3277 and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/77145512 for an explanation why there is a problem with this change.
Andreas Binder (2019-08-25 06:32:41+00:00): Maxspeed is the maximum legal speed limit and not the highest possible maxspeed (see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed). This road section has variable maxspeed limits shown on signal board and this boards does NOT show always the same maxspeed depended on traffic amount. Please use 
maxspeed:practical or something like that for your highest possible maxspeed
jeka p (2019-09-01 06:16:31+00:00): For example the highest speed limit on this section I have ever seen was always 100:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490172065
I have driven here already more than 10 times (weekend and workdays, summer and winter).
Have you ever seen more than 100 on this section? If no, maxspeed=none is not really useful... especially for routing software
Andreas Binder (2019-09-03 18:42:36+00:00): I missed the approved proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dynamic_maxspeed so you tagging seems to be correct. Sorry for my comment.
jeka p (2019-10-03 19:27:31+00:00): Hi! no problem. for me such tagging really makes more sense and is more useful in practice.
BR, Jeka
Dimacn (2019-08-25 07:08:41+00:00): Прекратите добавлять несуществующие объекты!
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
Dimacn (2019-08-25 07:07:20+00:00): Прекратите добавлять несуществующие объекты!
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
pitscheplatsch (2019-08-29 11:55:08+00:00): Hi k-ham.

Please use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
ralley (2019-08-25 07:38:39+00:00): Why have you changed this from a swimming pool to a pond?  From the aerial imagery it definitely appears to be a pool.  Also please use desciptive changeset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ralley (2019-08-28 09:06:21+00:00): Changed back to swimming pool by james2185
Hjart (2019-08-25 07:24:47+00:00): I changed this to an area yesterday
Ocean Lynagh (2019-08-25 14:43:03+00:00): Hi - can you help me with a query? I’ve noticed on several occasions that after I make an edit, you come along a few days later and do “removing duplicated section of way”.  I am doing something that is causing a problem?
BCNorwich (2019-08-26 06:57:03+00:00): Hello, 
I have studied this changeset in detail and cannot see anything that pertains to contributions you have made. 

I did amend duplicated sections of ferry routes in this changeset by separating them, (thus they no longer shown as duplicated sections).

If you could give a changeset number where I have amended one of your contributions I will certainly look at it and try to explain. I am also aware that I can make mistakes.

We did exchange comments back in August 2018.

Regards Bernard.
Ocean Lynagh (2019-08-26 07:05:13+00:00): Hi Bernard, many thanks. I guess it is just a coincidence then, that just after I added some items in Padstow, you edited the ferry routes (which were not my changeset, so I don’t mind at all).   I just wanted to double check that it was not me inadvertently causing you the issue, as this coincidence has happened before. Thanks for your help last year - you got me started and I’ve done quite a bit since then. I am enjoying this mapping a lot now. Ocean
ralley (2019-08-25 07:42:33+00:00): Do you have a source for this?  From the aerial it does not appear to be a park and the name seems suspicious as well.
ralley (2019-08-25 17:38:14+00:00): Deleted by james2185
ralley (2019-08-25 07:35:58+00:00): Please don't use OSM to map fantasy or joke elements
ralley (2019-08-25 07:40:09+00:00): Can I ask what the source for this name is?  It looks like naming an individuals house based on their name which is not good practice.  Thanks.
Retired Account (2019-11-04 13:36:19+00:00): Hi,
Why is there a need to introduce multi-polygon for a simple area (Millenia Walk) without any inner polygons?
Hjart (2019-08-25 08:24:12+00:00): Er du opmærksom på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning og at Nymøllevej i forvejen havde cycleway=track tags?
Tntdruid (2019-08-25 08:43:58+00:00): Der er jeg klar over, nu passer det med IRL :)
Hjart (2019-08-25 09:19:06+00:00): Nu er jeg ikke sikker på hvorvidt du har forstået at det ikke er så smart at have både det ene og det andet.
parsd51 (2019-08-29 13:06:20+00:00): Når du vælger at lave separate cykelstier (på trods af defakto vejledningen for cykelstier), ret da også fortove, så de er placeret rigtigt ifht vejen/cykelstien (ikke altid på cykelstien) - som de var før - IRL
Tntdruid (2019-08-29 16:09:47+00:00): Der er ikke noget "fortove" kan godt tilføjet det.
parsd51 (2019-08-29 17:43:41+00:00): Det er ikke det her changeset jeg tænker på, men de efterfølgende. Jeg synes bare det er bedst at holde diskussionen et sted.

Ermelundsvej er bare et eksempel (her er vej, cykelsti og fortov fysisk sammenhængende med kantsten i mellem). Fortovet er med fortovsbelægning og der er ingen skilte med cykelsti eller gangsti:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=55.76053&lon=12.53647

Bilvejen er tagget foot no og sidewalk both
Cykelstien er tagget foot designated.
Fortovet hænger på vejen og cykelstien er ved siden af. 
For mig passer det ikke sammen IRL og er unødigt kompliceret.

Jeg forstår ikke argumentet for at mappe særskilte cykelstier, som ligger op ad vejen:
- Fra den, af Hjart, linkede cykelvejledning ser jeg ingen af kriterierne for separat cykelsti matche. Det har været debatteret meget og jeg tror man er blevet enige om vejledningen.
- Det er vel lige så meget IRL, hvis cykelstien sidder på vejen. Opencyclemap renderer det fint.
- Jeg ser ret store konsekvenser ved separate cykelstier, som ligger tæt på vejen - manglende mulighed for krydsning af vejen (mærkværdige ruter), cykelsti forbindelser nødvendig ved alle sideveje på modsat side (for at undgå unødige og mærkelige ruter), fortove ifht vej/cykelsti, kompliceret tagging og komplekse veje og dermed mere komplekst vedligehold etc. Med vej, cykelsti og fortov på samme vej kan cyklister og fodgængere krydse vejen som i virkeligheden.

Hvad er din begrundelse for at mappe separate cykelstier som er tæt ved vejen?
ivanbranco (2021-12-30 09:39:31+00:00): Hi ashs_as,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718074272/history

this way have an invalid place value, can you check it out please?
ashs_as (2021-12-30 13:16:12+00:00): Hello ivanbranco,
Sorry for this mistake, I Fixed it.
Regards
ashs_as
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
Hjart (2019-08-25 10:48:44+00:00): Spar klassificeres bedst som supermarked
archie (2019-08-25 16:09:08+00:00): Ok, tak. Det var märkligt; jag valde convenience fordi de flesta andra var taggade så. Med andra ord, jag kontrollerade detta extra i sökfältet på carto (slår "Spar, Danmark" så kommer du att se det; du kan även slå på "Spar, Odsherred"). Det vill säga du får göra en hel del omtaggningar. :-)
Hjart (2019-08-30 23:09:19+00:00): Der har været en del meget små Spar (Kwik Spar etc) butikker rundt omkring, som vi tidligere har tagget convenience. De nyere Spar butikker er typisk på størrelse med andre mellemstore supermarkeder (Fakta, Netto, Rema 1000, SuperBrugsen osv)
pio2_122 (2019-08-25 09:23:05+00:00): To jest maszt, a nie wieża. Dlatego poprawny tag to man_made=mast.
Strtg_ (2019-09-05 09:03:39+00:00): А чому перейменували Чорноморський завод? Це різні заводи які існують Верф номер ЄДРПОУ 33853834, а Чорноморський суднобудівний завод 14312980. І ця територія згідно з даними реєстру речових прав на нерухоме майно належить Чорноморському суднобудівному заводу. Тому, будь ласка скасуйте цю правку.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-25 09:22:17+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 73708017, 73708073, 73712125.
AndersAndersson (2019-08-26 05:09:49+00:00): What is this? Adding nonsense tags to 13 year old deleted nodes.
hasaan22 (2019-08-27 06:49:35+00:00):  I don't khnow. I edit two nodes in  Iran.(770240 & 766475)
AndersAndersson (2019-09-01 19:58:53+00:00): I removed the two nodes. They didn't contain any relevant information.
hasaan22 (2019-09-02 07:28:48+00:00): thanks.
Roudcach (2019-08-25 11:27:40+00:00): Doit remplacer celui qui est sur la rue principale carrer de pi y margall
freebeer (2019-08-29 22:00:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73899898 where the changeset comment is: delete a random map scribble
mavl (2019-08-25 14:19:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавляете объекты, которых не видно на спутниковых снимках. Напишите, пожалуйста, какими источниками вы пользуетесь? Вы уверены, что Самусь, (а также многие дороги) находится в этом месте?  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
gendy54 (2019-08-30 22:43:27+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour ta contrib.
J'ai fait une petite correction sur ton eau potable.
On utilise pas le tag name pour décrire ce qui l'est déjà ou peu l'être via un tag.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques
viloan (2019-08-25 10:06:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-08-25 10:57:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-25 10:59:20+00:00): Review..
name:en Van der Schuir fish  lijkt me niet logisch. Dat is niet de gebruikelijke naam.
Beter weghalen. Verder svp bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Dus niet zelf adressen aanmaken. 
In Maps.me kan dat ook.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-25 11:10:46+00:00): 
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
eggie (2019-08-25 10:43:02+00:00): Een ouder account, maar nu een eerste edist.. daarom alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-25 10:51:43+00:00): Dag mf meulenbelt.. 
Eigenlijk heeft wel elke straat een straatnaam. Volgens de BGT is dit de Zijhuizen. Die naam heb ik toegevoegd. 
De Nassaulaan is het zeker niet.
MVG,
Eggie
mfmeulenbelt (2019-08-25 11:57:05+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Bedankt dat je het even hebt nagekeken. Is het niet beter om het stuk langs het voetpad dat al met Zijhuizen is aangegeven ook Zijhuizen te noemen en het overgebleven stukje straat tot het Kenaupark te rekenen? Nummers 26 en 28 zijn immers Kenauparkadressen.
eggie (2019-08-25 12:13:05+00:00): Lastig stukje hier. Klikt logisch, maar in de BGTziet het er dus niet logisch uit.  Up to you als lokale mapper. Er lopen wel busroutes hier. Je zult dan de weg moeten splitsen en daar is editor iD niet de ideale tool voor.Met JOSM gaat dat beter. editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-25 12:17:37+00:00): De BAG biedt helaas ook geen oplossing.
Die Kenau gaf in haar tijd ook al problemen.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=kenaupark%2026&resultOffset=0&objectId=0392100000036876&geometry.x=103765.62599573&geometry.y=488921.97899851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0392010000030977
mfmeulenbelt (2019-08-25 12:21:12+00:00): Dank je, ik ga daar naar kijken als ik wat meer tijd heb.
gormur (2019-08-25 12:23:15+00:00): You need to relax a bit.
Having some duplicates is not a big problem. A bigger problem is that you keep deleting true information. Last time you did this to one of my contributions, the multipolygon got deleted by someone else "because it was empty", making investigation even harder.
If you really want to avoid duplicates, don't jut delete the multipolygon. Rather add the aerodrome node to the multipolygon as the ARP.
Also, if you have concerns about how orher people map, write a changeset comment and don't just delete stuff. Otherwise we have no way, as a community, to improve.
As this is the second time you do this to data I have contributed, I am tempted to report you to the Data Working Group as I am sure you have done the same with multiple other aerodromes.
dval (2019-09-04 14:12:55+00:00): Здесь Вы территорию автодрома обозначили как building. Такого быть не должно.
dval (2019-09-26 14:20:36+00:00): Есть много домов с одинаковыми адресами. Напр., 5 шт. Мелиораторов, 38. Как навигаторы должны их различать?
pyrog (2020-06-06 07:12:20+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour tes contributions dans OSM.
Essai de regrouper tes modifications sur un petit secteur, par exemple un pour Saint-Maximin et un pour Yenne.

Regarde aussi si un objet n'existe pas déjà : il y a 2 offices de tourisme à Yenne ;)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6743777732
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6759243785

Bonne continuation,
__
Yves
gscscnd (2019-08-25 11:33:50+00:00): Tory nie powinny mieć layer=-1, bo znalazłyby się pod warstwą obszaru kopalni (linia https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89962295 ma domyślny layer=0). Usunąłem layer=-1 z torów i dodałem layer=1 do budynków (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73715431).
Kovoschiz (2019-08-25 11:02:52+00:00): That should be changed to `access=private`, not deleted.
Kovoschiz (2019-08-25 11:12:41+00:00): Can you add the gate?
Kovoschiz (2019-08-25 11:13:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73714939, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73714990, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73715029
Kovoschiz (2019-08-25 11:16:25+00:00): Also, it seems you are allowed to open the gate and pass through it from inside the Farm as a visitor there.
Kovoschiz (2019-08-25 11:20:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73715196
mavl (2019-12-04 09:00:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
eggie (2019-08-25 11:01:46+00:00): Tip: Probeer svp op de bestaande adresnodes bij te taggen. Verder begint phone in Nederland met +31
name:en  lijkt me onlogisch. Gebruiken die bedrijven winkels deze Engelse vertalingen?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-25 11:02:48+00:00): In Friesland wordt wel name=.... als officiële naam gebruikt en name:nl=voor de Hollandse naam.
Leo Slager (2019-08-25 22:10:24+00:00): Zeer merkwaardig.
Of je hebt een hele slechte navigatie-app die fietsers over highway=foot stuurt,
of je hebt zelf de instelling voor wandelaars gekozen.
bicycle=no op een footway is volkomen overbodige onzin.
mikkolukas (2020-05-05 20:31:08+00:00): please, lad være med at tegne cykelstier som selvstændige veje, når de bare er adskilt fra gaden med en kantsten eller hvid streg.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
abakus_uploader (2019-08-25 22:30:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
eggie (2019-08-25 12:02:47+00:00): Hint... Hi angelov... please look for and add at the present addressnode . Don't add addressnodes in OSM. 
Gr eggie
a-angelov (2019-08-25 15:06:32+00:00): Hi, what do you mean by address node?
eggie (2019-08-25 15:25:16+00:00): 22-04 is situated here in fact .. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2754998001#map=19/51.44683/5.45807
So you may use the BAG addressnode (import Dutch kadaster)
Greetz, Eggie
eggie (2019-08-25 15:29:18+00:00): In this case you added also  two identical poi's on top of each other.
This was your edit.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=73715448