piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:58:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93034694
mariotomo (2021-11-28 21:28:55+00:00): hi. you changed here the position of nodes that define province borders, nodes that fall in the sea. what is the source you used? you only state the imagery used.  so how could you correct the position of these nodes?
Trevor_1 (2021-11-29 01:25:08+00:00): I was trying to make the boundary more smooth. I admit I shouldn't have done it without a source, but this was a year ago, so please don't get mad at me for it. I haven't been making any more edits in Panama, and I won't unless you need me to correct something. Feel free to revert or change any of my edits that you don't like.
mariotomo (2021-11-29 13:15:13+00:00): (please don't take this as a personal remark) but to "make the boundary more smooth", a boundary defined by laws and decrees, that's a silly thing to do, I hope you convene.  I know how to revert changesets, but do me a favour and please do revert this yourself, and please do this for any other similar "prettifying" edits you performed on administrative borders.  thanks you.
Trevor_1 (2021-11-29 13:30:20+00:00): I'm sorry, but I actually don't know how to revert it, because the website that I gave you a link to, can't revert changesets unless they were the last changeset to edit something. Since someone else edited this line after me, it won't work. I only use ID editor because my computer is old and kind of slow.
Trevor_1 (2021-11-29 13:37:38+00:00): I did edit some of the other borders when I added the corregimientos, but I tried to follow the official maps as closely as I could
Trevor_1 (2021-11-29 13:45:28+00:00): I'll try to figure out a way to revert it this week
mariotomo (2021-11-30 21:24:09+00:00): indeed, one »can't revert changesets unless they were the last changeset to edit something«, no matter which tool you use.  JOSM offers partial reverting, which is a time intensive operation.
(what official maps? you did not mention them in the sources. remember we do not have permission to use maps from the IGNTG, we can only read laws and process the text description.)
Trevor_1 (2021-11-30 23:28:48+00:00): I used the maps from the gaceta. I actually did put the link to them in the Source for the corregimientos that I added (in Colon district) http://gacetas.procuraduria-admon.gob.pa/19981_1984.pdf
mariotomo (2021-12-01 00:47:17+00:00): I see.  for such public domain sources, have you considered using a map warper service?  like https://mapwarper.net/
mariotomo (2021-12-01 00:53:11+00:00): p.s.: this you're mentioning is a **very** old source, January 1984 is almost 38 years ago, and is relative to the Colón Province, while here we're looking at a border in the Pacific, between two provinces along a border established in January 2014, not yet 8 years ago.  so again: what source did you use here?
Trevor_1 (2021-12-01 01:00:54+00:00): No, I haven't, but I'll look into it. I actually didn't use a source for this, I just tried to make it look more smooth. Once I get a new computer, I'll look for a source and try to fix it back.
mariotomo (2021-12-01 01:32:37+00:00): you see: unless we manage to get access to the IGNTG maps, the only trustworthy sources are the Spanish text of the "gaceta".  they are often difficult to decipher.  I think the only reasonable thing to do is to forget about it until OSM gets access to the official data in digital format.  please do not edit stuff just to make the map look better, "smoother" as you say.  sometimes ((very) often) official borders are edgy.
Trevor_1 (2021-12-01 01:45:57+00:00): Ok good idea. I won't do that. anymore.
tastrax (2020-11-10 01:11:53+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Kovoschiz (2020-10-26 06:31:00+00:00): `place=village` is only used for larger settlements. https://osmcha.org/changesets/93042445
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93035880
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:57:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93035882
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:57:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93036018
Stalker61 (2020-10-26 07:35:35+00:00): Добрый день.
источником адресации поделитесь пожалуйста.
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:57:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93036059
Stalker61 (2020-10-26 07:35:53+00:00): Добрый день.
источником адресации поделитесь пожалуйста.
Stalker61 (2020-10-26 07:36:11+00:00): Добрый день.
источником адресации поделитесь пожалуйста.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
Stalker61 (2020-10-26 07:36:25+00:00): Добрый день.
источником адресации поделитесь пожалуйста.
Stalker61 (2020-10-26 07:36:39+00:00): Добрый день.
источником адресации поделитесь пожалуйста.
Stalker61 (2020-10-26 07:36:53+00:00): Добрый день.
источником адресации поделитесь пожалуйста.
Stalker61 (2020-10-26 07:37:06+00:00): Добрый день.
источником адресации поделитесь пожалуйста.
Stalker61 (2020-10-26 07:37:19+00:00): Добрый день.
источником адресации поделитесь пожалуйста.
jonorossi (2020-10-27 04:16:52+00:00): You've removed the building=* tag from the building and added landuse=plant_nursery to the building (renders green now), which isn't very accurate as there are no plants inside the big shed only under the northern awning and outside (sometimes with shade cloth).

I've made some changes in changeset 93089856 including adding some more detail. Happy to discuss if you disagree with my changes.

Jono
Tech Dec (2020-10-27 04:42:27+00:00): Thanks for the pickup Jono. My mistake, I thought I'd found the right tags but apparently not. Your changes are great, thanks for fixing it up.
Oguzhan Er (2021-04-14 13:58:22+00:00): I think this is not a road
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93038816
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:56:40+00:00): I reviewed your mappings here as well.
In general fair mapped but not squared.
Please square each rectangular building with the q key.
Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93039456
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:53:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93039498
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:55:12+00:00): Your mappings here are rather precise but not well squared.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93039498
4004 (2020-11-08 23:58:48+00:00): здравствуйте, это временное ограничение?
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:53:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93042038
Anton Khorev (2020-11-04 17:16:02+00:00): Вы урлы типа
https://british-bakery.ru/shops/grecheskiy-pr-25/
сносите случайно (копипаста одинаковых тегов) или специально (это более стабильный адрес)?
Frans S (2020-10-27 15:52:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)
About your mappings.  Well mapped and squared.

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messagess
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93042312
user_8655426 (2020-10-26 11:12:58+00:00): こんばんは。
変更セットのコメントを "update trace", "update tag" とされていますが、これでは何のデータをどう変更したのかがまったくわかりません。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/trace1125/history
地元編集者や他のユーザーに編集の内容・意図が伝わるよう、もう少しわかりやすく書いていただきたいです。

・変更セットの良いコメント
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:変更セットの良いコメント

また、安楽椅子マッピングをされているようですが、変更したデータの前編集者や地元編集者とのトラブルを防ぐため、編集のもととなった情報源(source)を変更セットに記入することも検討してください。

・安楽椅子マッピングのガイドライン 「自分の使っているソースを明らかにしよう。」
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:安楽椅子マッピング
・source
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:source

それからこのセット内で、実際は曲線状になっている道路(県道への連絡路)を真っ直ぐにしています。
https://osmcha.org/changesets/93043746/
既存データの形状を変更する際は、現地でのGPSデータや「最新の」航空画像を確認して慎重に行ってください。

・画像の利用 「他人が作った地物を安易に動かさないでください」
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:画像の利用

私が三遠南信自動車道で取得したGPSロガーのデータを確認しましたが、この周辺は地理院の航空画像がずれもなく正確です。それを背景として修正をお願いいたします。
user_8655426 (2020-11-22 11:28:42+00:00): 修正しました。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94575915
https://osmcha.org/changesets/94575915/
VitalieS (2020-11-01 05:20:39+00:00): Bună, 
Locația există deja pe OSM. Puteți verifica dacă  ceea ce ați adăugat nu este o dublură?
user_5359 (2020-10-26 08:20:41+00:00): Hello, what is the meaning of the tag addr=woman;child? Did you mean something like school:for=womann;child?
Branko Kokanovic (2020-10-29 13:15:37+00:00): Cesta greska kod pocetnika je sto ne uracunaju prizemlje kod building:levels, pa se pazi toga!:)

inace, super sto si krenuo ovo da radis. Ako te zanima, imali smo davno ovu temu (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=66945) gde je RGZ dao spisak svih stambenih zajednica (building=apartments), i ja sam pokrio Novi Beograd, ali ako imas nesto drugo gde treba da upalim skriptu, da pokrijemo zajedno poluautomatski - samo reci!

U svakom slucaju - samo cepaj!:)
Janjko (2020-10-26 09:07:50+00:00): Možeš li objasniti zašto brišeš četvrti po Zagrebu? Prije takve odluke bi se trebalo konzultirati na hr mailing listi. Molim te vrati ove četvrti ili ćemo morati vratiti te promjene.
VitalieS (2020-11-01 05:18:46+00:00): Bună,
La ce adresă mai exact s-a deschis Librarius aici? Este vorba despre str. Ion Creangă, 49/2? Din datele pe care le am la moment, aici se află locațiile următoare: Mobiasbanca, Acquazzurro și General Asigurări. Puteți să ne confirmați care din acestea s-a închis și în locul căreia s-a deschis Librarius?
eggie (2020-10-28 12:32:39+00:00): Dag jw88,
Je hebt de straten ingetekend. Dat lijkt me oke. 
Wanneer het nog bouwstraten zijn zou je ook highway=construction kunnen taggen met construction=residential als extra tag. 
De landuse farmland en grass heb ik even omgezet naar landuse=contruction, want er wordt nog gebouwd.
De nieuwe woningen kun je laten importeren door een verzoek te doen op het forum van OSM 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 

Dit doe je in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. Inlog identiek aan OSM account.
Doe je het zelf?
MVG,
eggie
Supaplex (2020-10-26 11:08:07+00:00): 看來一年前變刪掉了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/289554109
已經補回來了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93047556
Vintagejhan (2020-10-30 02:27:16+00:00): 感謝！突然發現到消失的
simulator1 (2020-10-26 08:54:21+00:00): Zašto je obrisana Željeznička kolonija?
https://magazin.hrt.hr/401850/zeljeznicka-kolonija-u-maksimiru-zasticena-je-kulturno-povijesna-cjelina

Ako je krivi tag, onda nije rješenje obrisati podatke nego promijeniti tag.
habi (2021-02-04 08:26:15+00:00): Ciao tva63
Ich hab die Webseite von `contact:phone` zu 'website' geändert.
Gruss,
Habi
Hb- (2020-10-26 12:05:20+00:00): For original source see https://twitter.com/azyakancokkacan/status/1319958487414210562
maro21 (2020-10-29 19:45:51+00:00): Jak tory tramwajowe mogą być w budowie, skoro jeszcze nie ma nawet wiaduktu?
Mordechai23 (2020-10-29 23:06:21+00:00): Budowa każdego obiektu inżynieryjnego, czy to most, czy przepust, czy tunel, jest fragmentem budowy linii tramwajowej i takiej reguły używają mapujący mosty drogowe i kolejowe w budowie w Polsce. Jeśli nie wiadukt, o co powinno się według Ciebie pojawić na budowie, żeby można ją było oznaczyć railway=construction? Płyty betonowe? szyny? A sam wiadukt - też jest w budowie dopóki tory i droga na nim nie zostaną ukończone - dlatego oznaczenie torów i drogi w budowie jest jak najbardziej w mojej opinii zasadne
Evil001 (2020-10-26 09:23:17+00:00): approve
Tresho (2020-10-26 08:57:48+00:00): Sorry, I didn't want to request a review
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93049721
geronet (2020-10-28 22:00:58+00:00): public_transport=station und hat mir iD vorgeschlagen, war wohl falsch?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93049884
ToniE (2020-10-29 07:30:46+00:00): yep, die public_transport:version = 2 für Busse, Züge, Tram, ... sieht vor

- Bahnsteige mit public_transport = platform

- Haltepunkte auf Straße/Schiene/ ... public_transport = stop_position + tram/bus/train/... = yes je nach Verkehrsmittel

- Bahnhöfe: die Fläche oder einen Punkt innerhalb des Geländes als public_transport = station

zu mappen.
ToniE (2020-10-29 07:32:33+00:00): BTW: ich sehe gerade die vielen kleinen Punkte nördlich der Schienen  als power=pole gemapped, aber ohne Kabel? power=minor_line oder so?
geronet (2020-11-03 20:14:41+00:00): Das sind von der Zugspitzbahn die Oberleitungsmasten, aber auf denen sitzt oben noch eine zusätzliche Leitung drauf. Die sollte man mal verbinden.. Hat jemand mal einzeln eingetragen ;)
ToniE (2020-11-04 07:31:22+00:00): Interessant, gibt es für Oberleitungsmasten nicht sogar ein Tag? catenary ... exakt:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dcatenary_mast

wobei die (Ober-)Leitung dann wohl eher über den Schienen liegt.
geronet (2020-11-04 08:19:48+00:00): Naja nicht direkt, sieht man gut auf den Bildern bei Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayerische_Zugspitzbahn
Nakaner (2020-11-04 08:33:36+00:00): Hallo,

power=catenary_mast ist für Oberleitungsmasten. Die Oberleitung selbst, die bis auf wenige exotische Sonderbauarten mittig über dem Gleis in einem Zickzack hängt, wird nicht extra gemappt, stattdessen wird electrified=contact_line am Gleis-Way erfasst. Wenn jedoch auf den Oberleitungsmasten zusätzlich eine sogenannte Speiseleitung mitgeführt wird, wird diese als power=minor_line erfasst. Falls kein Trafo/Umrichter zwischen der Speiseleitung und der Fahrleitung hängt, führt die Speiseleitung die Spannung und Frequenz der Fahrleitung.

Viele Grüße

Michael
ToniE (2020-11-04 08:50:49+00:00): Danke,

d.h. power=pole auf power=catenary_mast ändern und mit Linie power=minor_line (+ cables=?) verbinden?

Ist weiter westlich schon erfolgt, aber mit 'note'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300357282

Gruß,
Toni
geronet (2020-11-04 09:21:10+00:00): Weiter östlich scheint keine Speiseleitung mehr dran zu sein, deshalb wohl nicht verbunden: https://www.hoehenrausch.de/wandern/kinder/riessersee-partnachklamm/bilder.php#gallery-1
Das kann ich gelegentlich mal prüfen.
geronet (2020-11-04 09:28:15+00:00): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayerische_Zugspitzbahn#Stromversorgung
Oberleitung ist Gleichstrom, hat keine Frequenz ;)
geronet (2020-11-04 14:40:06+00:00): War gerade vor Ort, die Leitung geht 3-phasig tatsächlich so wie eingezeichnet vom Umspannwerk Kreuzeckbahnstraße übers Feld und dann an der Bahn entlang Richtung Süden/Westen. Aber: An der Außerfernbahn die parallel entlang läuft sind Betonmasten für die Oberleitung, auf denen sitzt ganz oben auch eine einzelne Leitung entlang der Gleise. Ich glaub das geht so bis zur Landesgrenze.
ququruzka (2020-12-16 19:32:47+00:00): Добрий день!
імена вулиць (name=*)територією України прийнято писати українською мовою а також дублювати в name:uk=*.
Виправляємо
ottwiz (2020-10-26 09:11:51+00:00): Also added a tree row, it can be seen better on Maxar / hozzáadtam még fasort is,Maxarról jobban látszik
Frans S (2020-10-26 12:27:00+00:00): Hi.  You asked for a review.
You mapped top left in a agriculture area. Use tag=track here. 
Always try to map a bit over the edged of your task. Mappers on the other task than can continue that roads.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93050875
naveenpf (2020-10-30 10:55:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM India. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on. https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93050938
clairedelune (2020-11-25 16:26:22+00:00): Hello, thanks for adding new place names in Ituri! However all of these seem to be village names rather than apartments, could you please confirm? In the future, please crosscheck the way you are categorizing points added to the map. Please also note that only the first letter should be capitalized in names. In case any help is needed, feel free to ask. Thank you.
gileri (2020-10-26 09:48:03+00:00): Merci pour cet ajout ! Pour faciliter le suivi, pouvez-vous mettre les numéro de note (idéalement l'URL) dans le tag "source" du changeset (deuxième champ lors de l'envoi sur JOSM) ?

Merci :)

Éric
Syl (2020-10-26 10:46:52+00:00): Jusqu'à présent je mettais le numéro en commentaire pour aller au plus vite mais j'essaierai de penser à l'ajouter dans source à l'avenir. Merci pour la remarque.
Kovoschiz (2020-10-26 11:08:38+00:00): Can pedestrians pass through?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93051916
Wagner Swl (2020-11-30 12:43:21+00:00): No, cannot.  It would have to look for other village lanes so to get back to the same route age.  Cars definitely cannot pass through.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93051916
gurglypipe (2020-10-26 10:42:02+00:00): Hi, just checking: is Derwent Folds really height=1, i.e. a building which is 1m tall?
user_5589836 (2020-10-27 07:40:39+00:00): Nope, just a mistake. Fixed..
Frans S (2020-10-26 11:54:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery/
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93053315
user_5359 (2020-10-27 14:45:52+00:00): Hello! Please check your "man_made=pier" entries (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Zry). I assumed there is an error with a missing name key.