piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:00:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
mavl (2023-05-23 16:47:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
mavl (2023-05-23 16:47:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
DaveTO (2023-04-25 20:56:06+00:00): Cycling is allowed on all Ontario roads, except for the #400 series of highways. bicycle=no should not be used to flag our personal opinion about which roads are suitable for riding a bicycle.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
VLD517 (2022-10-20 12:41:36+00:00): Businesses located on the roadside of the street in question put "Jalan Siliwangi" in their address. Is there any reason to change the street name from "Jalan Siliwangi" to "Jalan Puspiptek"?
FajrAl (2022-10-20 13:40:25+00:00): The Jalan Puspiptek only stretched from Pusat Penelitian Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi area in the west to the T-intersection meeting the Jalan Parakan and Jalan Siliwangi in the east. The Jalan Siliwangi then continue to the east to T-intersection or roundabout near Universitas Pamulang.
VLD517 (2022-11-03 01:15:49+00:00): Understood, thank you.
Steelwing (2022-09-21 05:33:33+00:00): Поправка комментария: Гульдала, дома
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-30 08:48:04+00:00): Solo prekyba negali būti Kirtimų 56, nes toks adresas neegzistuoja. Matyt pagal gretimą pastatą 53 namas?
DaanLT (2022-09-30 10:09:53+00:00): jo 53 turi būti, klaviatūroje nepataikiau
nitro_expander (2022-12-15 07:22:38+00:00): nice edit !  💯
is this related to any mapping event?
Vis_M (2025-06-14 21:47:48+00:00): No, it was just edits from personal capacity. Thank you!
fgouget (2022-09-24 11:15:04+00:00): Bonjour,

Je ne comprends pas à quoi correspond cette ligne électrique : je ne la vois ni sur les photos aériennes (BD Ortho IGN, Bing, Esri, Maxar), ni sur la couche Volta (lignes électriques Enedis et RTE), ni sur les photos au sol (Bing Streetside).

Par ailleurs il manque des poteaux et elle ne devrait pas avoir de noeud sans attributs.

Cordialement,
GerdP (2023-12-22 15:20:24+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Du hast hier die Nummer an der WKA als name=* eingetragen. Meist wird dafür ref=* benutzt. Hast Du einen speziellen Grund für den Schlüssel name? Spricht was dagegen, das zu ändern?
user_5359 (2022-09-30 05:46:43+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mjR. What is the meaning of the tags
BFSNr = 1702
Qualitaets = AV93
Stand_am = 2014
TID = 410
Typ = Gebaeude
?
eggie (2022-10-02 20:38:17+00:00): Beste BEmapp

access=private lijkt me prima...
Opritten kunnen ook van belang zijn voor hulpdiensten die ook gebruik maken van OSM zoals bv de bandweer en andere hulpdiensten. .
DaveF (2023-06-26 12:02:39+00:00): "This is a PUBLIC FOOTPATH. It's not "private", except to vehicles. " 
In which case it there's no requirement for access=no, as highway=footway defines the access restriction.
eggie (2022-09-21 07:35:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-21 07:53:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. denominaton = evangelical toegevoegd. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Dodko (2022-09-21 08:29:53+00:00): Názov studničky sa vypĺňa, iba ak má naozaj svoje meno.
nevw (2022-09-21 10:29:00+00:00): Hi
you have changed an amenity for 	bicycle_parking with capacity of 5 to...
a leisure park and named it Scarborough Beach. 
I can't see bicycle parking facilities in that spot on imagery so that should be deleted if it is not there.
The beach front is currently tagged...
name=Scarborough Point
natural=beach
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655304645
Scarborough Point is at the rockwall at the northern end and the beach looks wrongly named to me.
Do you agree?
I propose renaming the beach to Scarborough Beach and also naming the park Scarborough Beach too
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47906516#map=17/-27.20039/153.11562
Do you agree?
nevw (2022-09-21 10:51:33+00:00): I should have added these comments to this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126451849#map=19/-27.20130/153.11529
nevw (2022-09-21 10:55:25+00:00): in regards to changing the name of the suburb Scarborough to Scarborough, Queensland, Australia

I think this is incorrect and will need to be changed back.
nevw (2022-09-21 11:36:11+00:00): I will change the name to the correct format and also add the is_in tag as explained here…
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in
Crookiemonster (2022-09-21 12:08:45+00:00): There is bike parking in the park, I live opposite. The beach is called Scarborough Beach and the park is called Scarborough Beach Park. Scarborough Point is at the end of the Point, a different place. 

This is my first time using this platform so apologies if I've done something wrong.

There are at least 3 Scarboroughs in Australia in different states. We regularly get mixed up with Scarborough in Western Australia so is it a problem putting Queensland in?
nevw (2022-09-21 12:22:01+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply. I’ll change the name of the beach and park tomorrow and fix the bike parking tags up.
I wasn’t sure about the correct suburb naming method so I asked on out talk.au mailing lists and will change it as Alex has suggested. I think I might add the in_in tag too.
Cheers, Nev
nevw (2022-09-21 12:23:04+00:00): … the link to the mailing list…
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2022-September/date.html
Crookiemonster (2022-09-21 12:28:10+00:00): Thanks Nev, the only reason I am on here is because a house sitting platform that I am a member uses OpenStreetMap for locations of sit listings. For my listing Scarborough, Queensland, Australia doesnt come up so I thought I have a go at adding it. Really appreciate your help to get this sorted.
nevw (2022-09-21 12:31:34+00:00): Correction… in_in tag should read is_in
…bit tired today 😴
nevw (2022-09-22 04:48:16+00:00): I have made the changes now...
Corrected name, added current Scarborough node to the boundary relation. Named Scarborough Beach Park and Scarborough Beach areas and reinstated cycle parking.
nevw (2022-09-22 04:58:35+00:00): Regarding the house sitting platform listing, you should ensure the building is mapped and fully addressed as in this example in North Lakes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561299824#map=19/-27.21703/153.02899
or this example of a commercial building near you 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758458126#map=19/-27.19982/153.11440
Some websites that use the osm only update data infrequently and may use a separate database for addressing.
Crookiemonster (2022-09-22 20:42:54+00:00): Hi Nev, I just want to map the suburb so it links to Scarborough rather than an actual building, so it comes up as a location in the house sitting platform. I'm having trouble doing that.
nevw (2022-09-22 23:08:41+00:00): Hi, when you add addr:suburb=Scarborough , etc to your building the search engines will place your site within the Scarborough boundary relation
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11677688#map=15/-27.2037/153.1097  with the node on the roundabout being where the Scarborough label is placed on maps, but this depends on the zoom and the rendering engine has some control of that at the various zoom levels. In osm this boundary relation knows it belongs to Qld in Australia.
When searching for “Scarborough" multiple site around the world are found but if you add a bit more and search for "Scarborough, Qld" you will narrow the results and your platform should perform like that too.  
Once it is mapped in osm correctly, the rest depends on how well the site uses the database and how often updates are applied.
The best we can do is map things correctly and fully in a consistent agreed way in line with our wiki and then it’s up to the app and map providers to display and update the information in the way they prefer.
If you think it all looks correctly mapped and your site does not appear as expected you should contact the platform next, but they are often not very helpful and just tell you they use OSM.
If you feel that the way we are mapping osm is where the problem lies and you need further help from more experienced mappers you could make a query on the Talk.au mailing list or on the new OSM Community site https://community.openstreetmap.org/
Someone may be familiar with the house sitting platform you use.
pesec (2022-09-21 09:42:21+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Постарайтесь указывать в названии правок суть вносимой информации.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
pesec (2022-09-21 09:41:58+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Постарайтесь указывать в названии правок суть вносимой информации.
pesec (2022-09-21 09:42:46+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Постарайтесь указывать в названии правок суть вносимой информации.
pesec (2022-09-21 09:42:52+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Постарайтесь указывать в названии правок суть вносимой информации.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
pesec (2022-09-21 09:42:55+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Постарайтесь указывать в названии правок суть вносимой информации.
pesec (2022-09-21 09:45:44+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Постарайтесь указывать в названии правок суть вносимой информации.
Это поможет другим участникам в поиске и увязке данных.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
pesec (2022-09-21 09:45:51+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Постарайтесь указывать в названии правок суть вносимой информации.
Это поможет другим участникам в поиске и увязке данных.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
ivanbranco (2022-09-21 13:25:04+00:00): Ciao Padovanet,

per convenzione su OSM non scriviamo tutto in maiuscolo. Quindi qua potrebbe essere "Rotonda Marcella Di Folco" invece di "MARCELLA DI FOLCO". Se sei interessato sappi che si può anche inserire l'etimologia del nome, in questo caso potrebbe essere name:etymology:wikidata=Q3845497 che è la pagina wikidata della persona in questione (https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3845497).

Buon mapping
Padovanet (2022-09-22 06:43:46+00:00): Grazie per il feedback, il TUTTOMAIUSCOLO era ereditato dai documenti ufficiali, ma adatto volentieri il nome per tutte le rotonde inserite (avevo chiesto la revisione anche per altri changeset simili negli ultimi giorni).
Per l'arricchimento dei dati con l'etimologia: vedremo in futuro, probabilmente andrebbero prima popolate e revisionate le voci di wikipedia (e/o wikidata). Grazie ancora!
pesec (2022-09-21 09:45:54+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Постарайтесь указывать в названии правок суть вносимой информации.
Это поможет другим участникам в поиске и увязке данных.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
pyram (2022-09-23 21:02:30+00:00): Review:

That's OK.

Best regards
pyram
pesec (2022-09-21 09:45:59+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Постарайтесь указывать в названии правок суть вносимой информации.
Это поможет другим участникам в поиске и увязке данных.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
pesec (2022-09-21 09:46:18+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Постарайтесь указывать в названии правок суть вносимой информации.
Это поможет другим участникам в поиске и увязке данных.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
pesec (2022-09-21 09:46:22+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за участие в проекте.
Постарайтесь указывать в названии правок суть вносимой информации.
Это поможет другим участникам в поиске и увязке данных.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
GartenStuhl (2022-09-24 06:56:36+00:00): The name-tag isnt for project names. If those buildings are widely known as the "goldern buildings" then this would be correct, but i doubt that. I would remove these tags.
Giuseppe Giglio (2022-09-24 14:30:04+00:00): Agree. Changed it back again.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
pyram (2022-09-23 21:08:54+00:00): Review:

That's OK. But feel free to use as name the nepalese name and add name:en for the englisch one. Or is the englisch one the local usual one? 

Best regards
pyram
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.