piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-08-27 10:11:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
You mapped so many fields  as buildings
H: Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.

A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122798623
user_2066394 (2022-06-25 12:27:29+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/122799252
Was ist hier mit der Wegführung passiert?
map per (2023-04-25 10:18:28+00:00): Hallo AlexMu,

"geändert da in Maps von Apple immer wieder Fehler bei den Routen auftreten"

Bitte keine falschen Sachen einzeichnen nur weil ein Karteprogramm mit den Daten nicht zurecht kommt. 

Außerdem verwendet Apple Maps in Deutschland doch gar keine OSM Daten oder?

Ich würde vorschlagen diesen Änderungssatz zu reverten/zurückzusetzen.

Viele Grüße
map per
Frans S (2022-08-19 15:53:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate,
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
F: Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.
H: Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122799398
abakus_uploader (2022-06-24 22:33:09+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2022-06-26 05:47:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Diacritic (2022-06-27 07:27:23+00:00): Hi Scott,

Just a heads up on this edit.

The roundabout you modified at Fortress Road:

- The flares should have have names, at the moment they are not named.

-The connecting ways of a roundabout should not touch, regardless of how close they are.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Roundabout_Flares
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122799872
Diacritic (2022-06-27 07:29:09+00:00): Incidentally, the page also mentions that "Sometimes the split is only because of a roundabout flare, a small island not used by pedestrians or bicyclists for crossing. In this case there is no split needed, it is sufficient to set a separate node (not the node where the way is merging into the roundabout) tagged traffic_calming=island."

You can map this just as accurately without having to go to the trouble of splitting ways. :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122799872
btcprox (2022-06-24 12:18:36+00:00): (Sorry, meant Compassvale Helm, not Mast)
flohoff (2022-06-26 20:31:12+00:00): Moin,
diese änderung verstehe ich nicht. Da sind tonnen an tags auf dem Steinhagen place verschwunden, dafür ist ein municipality place ohne die ganzen informationen dazu gekommen.

Ist ja jetzt irgendwie ein Informationsverlust!??!

Und dann "15000" Einwohner. Das passt weder für die Stadt Steinhagen, noch für den Ortsteil. Wo kommt die Zahl her?

Flo
AmanBD (2022-07-13 07:50:09+00:00): Hello Kazi Ashraful Alam, 
This is a regional highway which should be classified as primary, not trunk.
The convention followed by Bangladeshi OSM contributors for highways are as follows:
National Highway (N): trunk
Regional Highway (R): primary
Zilla Road (Z): secondary
AmanBD (2022-07-13 12:49:18+00:00): For more details, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Tagging_Standard_for_Bangladesh
eggie (2023-01-10 10:05:59+00:00): Dag Sven..
Bestaat dit wegdeel wel?
Het routeert ook voor regulier verkeer van Zuid naar Noord. Dat lijkt me niet de bedoeling.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2023-01-10 10:11:40+00:00): Ik heb het gekunstelde wegdeel verwijderd.
Wanneer de VR app zijn werk goed doet zal de route tegen het verkeer in mogen gaan en/of het fietspad kunnen nemen. 
Mocht er echt iets sinds eind 2022 aangelegd zijn laat het dan even weten, maar dan zal het niet voor regulier verkeer mogen routeren. 
MVG
eggie

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122800271
eggie (2023-01-10 10:12:25+00:00): ?
Dit is al een probleem. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=52.14944%2C4.48787%3B52.15052%2C4.48864#map=19/52.15013/4.48814&layers=N
eggie (2023-01-10 10:41:15+00:00): Evt.. oneway:emergency=no op dat kleine stuk Herenstraat? .Vraag na hoe de app daarmee omgaat.
Mvg
Eggie
Sven Pothuizen (2023-01-10 12:10:50+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Vreemd dat regulier verkeer over een weg voor hulpdiensten wordt gestuurd. Mijn voorkeur zou wel zijn deze CADO te behouden er zijn in de middenberm voorzieningen voor getroffen het is namelijk een veel gebruikte route voor onze post Leiden Zuid in de richting van het centrum. Ik teken hem graag weer in met de tag acces NO en dan emergency YES. kan jij je daar in vinden?
Bij het navigeren over de fietspaden geeft onze navigatie niet het gewenste weer.
eggie (2023-01-10 12:15:49+00:00): Hoi Sven ben nu even niet thuis.
Je kunt m zelf intekenen en dan inderdaad met access no.
Thuis kijk ik wel even of het gelukt is straks.
Has overigens wel de uitzondering op oneway yes  voor hulpdiensten toegevoegd. Dat moet er dan wel weer af.
Mapse
Eggie
Sven Pothuizen (2023-01-10 12:16:08+00:00): Ik ga wel even proberen wat hij doet als ik in ons systeem de rijrichting aanpas kijken of dat dat het gewenst effect geeft zoals je aangeeft.
Sven Pothuizen (2023-01-10 12:20:58+00:00): In OSM is de "cado" er nu uit en heb in ons eigen systeem nu de rijrichting voor ons zef aangepast voor dat kleine stukje Herenstraat. De nieuwe upload van OSM gaat ergen vannacht er weer in dus check hem donderdag even misschien geeft dat voor dit stukje al een oplossing.
eggie (2023-01-10 12:22:10+00:00): Nou.... in ieder geval access=no emergency=yes op de cado dan.
Zodat het niet meer routeert voor janenalleman.
eggie (2023-01-10 12:27:35+00:00): Wanneer oneway:emergency=no op de reguliere eeg werkt in Live op dan is het oke zo.
Wanneer er echt een aparte rijbaan is aangelegd kan dat wellicht beter. Op de laatste foto zie ik geen aparte rijbaan.
Maar succes met testen
Eggie
Sven Pothuizen (2023-01-13 07:28:40+00:00): Hi Eggie,
Het is opgelost.
Hij gaat nu een klein stukje tegen het verkeer in en de Cado is eruit zodat het voor het reguliere verkeer goed gaat.
eggie (2023-01-13 08:35:55+00:00): Mooi...
Groet
eggie
flohoff (2022-06-26 20:32:08+00:00): Moin,
auch hier - Wo kommt die signifikant nach unten veränderte EInwohnerzahl her? 

Flo
flohoff (2022-06-26 20:35:03+00:00): Ich bin geneigt diesen und auch den andern changeset wieder zu reverten.

Flo
flohoff (2022-06-26 20:39:15+00:00): 
Diesen Changeset würde ich auch disputen. In Nordrhein-Westfalen gibt es das konzept der "Samtgemeinden" nicht. Die "Stadt Werther (Westf.)" ist teil des Kreises Gütersloh.

Es gibt darunter noch Stadtteile wie "Theenhausen", "Rotenhagen", "Häger"

Flo
MxxCon (2022-06-25 05:52:35+00:00): Hello.
What business are you mapping for?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122801183
StefanHRT (2022-06-24 12:45:45+00:00): Hallo,
has you looked at Mapillary for existing? in this area it gives actually photos in 360°/panorama.
nylon_overboard (2022-06-25 11:29:51+00:00): Hi! Unfortunately Mapilliary images don't load for me, and I've been so far unable to figure out why.  I will revisit if I get it working and another editor hasn't already looked into it.
StefanHRT (2022-06-25 13:08:16+00:00): It may be that you have to give permission for Mapillary somewhere. It's a Facebook service, but you have to give a separate permission for it. Maybe you can find the solution here, too, because especially in Berlin and partly in Brandenburg there are many current helpful photos. https://help.mapillary.com/hc/en-us/articles/115001777705-Editing-OpenStreetMap
jidanni (2022-06-29 06:48:06+00:00): https://marinairporter.com/stops-schedules/larkspur-landing/ says
Drop off location when coming from SFO to Marin is normally across the street, on Eastbound Sir Francis Drake Blvd., next to the Golden Gate Ferry parking lot.
atsialiak_lyft (2022-06-29 10:04:11+00:00): HI, jidanni!
My name is Aksana and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft.
Thank you for paying attention to our work.
I'm not sure I understand you correctly. In this changeset, ‘No U-turn’ was added on Larkspur Landing Circle (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1073032100 ) according to proprietary street-level imagery (date 06/07/2022) (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qBRSJazLPQ0l_izqIg9rns9bH7IcJ5eZ/view?usp=sharing ). Also, according to our research, the relation Marin AirPorter: SFO Airport => Novato (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10227279 ) was not affected.
Could you please clarify what exactly caused you doubt about this edit and 
please correct me if I’m missing something, I will be happy to discuss further.

Thank you for your contribution,
Aksana
jidanni (2022-06-29 20:26:57+00:00): All I know is on
https://marinairporter.com/stops-schedules/larkspur-landing/ they say
pick up and drop off are on different sides of the road, but you mapped
them to the same side. But as you say, there is now a new no-U turn
sign. I'll ask them to comment here on exactly how their bus now drives.
Thanks!
atsialiak_lyft (2022-06-30 11:57:34+00:00): HI, jidanni!
Thanks for your reply.
It looks like you are interested in the relation 10227279 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10227279 ) that was added in 2019 by clay_c (https://osmcha.org/changesets/76320786/ ). Perhaps your question regarding the location of bus stops is better addressed to this mapper.
The only thing that has been changed by me in this relation is the number of members (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/10227279 ), which increased due to the new 'No U-turn', which was mentioned in the previous comment. But the relation remains the same and complete. 
Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Best regards,
Aksana
jidanni (2022-07-01 17:21:51+00:00): OK, I let 'em know on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76320786/ . Thanks.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-25 12:31:20+00:00): Hello Dee Kaart,
Just wondered - have you any idea if all of the bits of http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=13725970 are correct?  It's been like this for ages: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jDp (and that was split from another, older, relation).
Best Regards,
Andy
Dee Kaart (2022-06-27 20:21:35+00:00): Hello, Andy.
Thank you for your inquiry. After some research, I'd say that the short section, on Branksome Dene Chine is not a part of, or relevant to the National Cycle Network Route 2. I think it should be removed.
The longer section, from the centre of Bournemouth to west of Branksome Park may be an (unauthorised/ deprecated) alternative (shorter/ more interesting?) way to connect to Route 25, using main roads - and that may be why it isn't actually connected to Route 2 at Bournemouth Pier on the map, although a cyclist could make that connection.
I could ask Sustrans (the owner of the Routes) for guidance, but I see that you are a member of the Data Working Group, and so a question from you will surely carry more authority.
The parallel routes at Boscombe are on-road/ off-road options, shown by Sustrans, and so I think they are correct.
As for the Mudeford Ferry 'spur', it look as if it may be an incomplete (unauthorised/ deprecated/ scenic) option for the route into Christchurch.
I'd be interested to hear what response you receive.
Links:
Sustrans:
https://www.sustrans.org.uk/national-cycle-network
The official connection Route 2 - 25:
https://explore.osmaps.com/find-routes?lat=50.716334&lon=-1.901478&zoom=13.6166&overlays=os-ncn-layer&style=Standard&type=2d&activity=&routeType=trusted&distance=0%2C20&duration=0%2C20&distanceOrDuration=distance&technicalDifficulty=0%2C4&stars=0&sortSelect=&placesCategory=
On-road/ off-road at Boscombe/ Southbourne:
https://explore.osmaps.com/find-routes?lat=50.720080&lon=-1.812268&zoom=13.5325&overlays=os-ncn-layer&style=Standard&type=2d&activity=&routeType=trusted&distance=0%2C20&duration=0%2C20&distanceOrDuration=distance&technicalDifficulty=0%2C4&stars=0&sortSelect=&placesCategory=
Dee Kaart (2022-06-27 20:43:11+00:00): Oh, Andy, I meant to say:
You probably know that Route 2 runs from Dover to St Austell, but we have only Christchurch to Axminster; could Sustrans give us the dataset of this Route, and the others? It would save an amount of manual effort, it would make OSM more relevant to more people, and it might resolve some questions/ FixMes. Perhaps not, given that they want to sell a physical map - but, er, only between Dawlish and Brockenhurst ..?
Dee.
Link:
https://www.sustrans.org.uk/find-a-route-on-the-national-cycle-network/route-2/
Dee Kaart (2022-06-28 18:15:46+00:00): Ah. A further thought, sorry. Of course, if those alternative routes (Bournemouth - Branksome, and Mudeford Ferry 'spur') aren't signposted by Sustrans as 'Route 2', they ought no to be so labelled on the Map. (I wasn't looking out for NCN signs while I was there, sorry.)
However, we might want to respect the original mapper's thought and, when removing the association with Route 2, create a new (OSM) Route, with a Description, say, to indicate that at least one person found it a useful option. Those with greater experience than I have may have a better idea.
Dee Kaart (2022-06-28 18:28:17+00:00): A-and ... I omitted the benefits to Sustrans of making their datasets available to OSM!
Currently, I have in mind:
* Authoritative and reliable representation of their routes on the Map
* Greater Public awareness of traffic-free/ traffic-minimal routes, especially in built-up areas
* Public awareness (without advertising, of course!) of Sustrans, what it does, and the health and social benefits it offers to the Public.
You will surely think of others.

Lastly, when I referred to "on-road/ off-road options" in my first response, I meant something more like "with-motorised-traffic/ without-motorised-traffic options", sorry.
I'll be quiet now.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-28 18:34:45+00:00): Thanks for that.  I suspect (based on what I've heard elsewhere) that Sustrans' own data for routes isn't licence-compatible with OSM, but I guess "asking them for a waiver" is always an option.
The routes always do seem to be in a state of flux, especially since "Paths for everyone" which removed sections which, although required for linkage, weren't great examples of cyclable routes.
I'm wary about connecting routes where they "logically ought to" because in some cases they definitely don't.  That's why I mentioned it to someone who might be local who might know what the signs said!
No problem if you don't - I'm sure some keen cyclist will cycle it (and correct the route) at some point.
Best Regards,
Andy
TrickyFoxy (2022-07-06 15:11:09+00:00): 👋
1. В настройках фонового изображения можно выбрать больше подложек. Например, Maxar, который здесь свежее и на котором есть дороги, которые вы удалили.
2. Улицы в с/т это обычно или просто Улица, или Служебная дорога. Но никак не primary, которым вы обозначили

исправлю
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122803326
MxxCon (2022-06-25 05:53:39+00:00): Hello.
What is the meaning of "year=1991" tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122803363
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
MapSpot (2022-06-24 13:39:30+00:00): Thanks for the help!

Just leaving a comment here in case any other changeset comments arise.
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
rene78 (2022-11-24 08:08:55+00:00): Kommentar zu Testwecken für https://github.com/rene78/latest-changes
rene78 (2025-11-16 08:36:24+00:00): Noch ein Kommentar zu Testzwecken
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
MxxCon (2022-06-25 05:57:31+00:00): Hello.
Please note that you absolutely CANNOT use data from Google Maps to map in OSM! It is a copyright violation!
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?
This edit is going to be reverted.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122804020
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
misterte (2022-06-27 17:48:25+00:00): Hallo,

die Nutzung der Daten vom Geodatenportal RLP für OSM ist leider nicht erlaubt. Dies gilt auch für alle anderen Änderungssätze die Du anhand vom Geoportal RLP gemacht hast.

VG
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
Pink Duck (2022-06-24 14:14:49+00:00): operator="UK Power Networks" too?
Coupaman (2022-06-24 14:49:43+00:00): D’oh! Yes, updated. Cheers
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
Đuro Jiří (2022-06-29 18:37:38+00:00): Scusa, hai aggiunto "Water source" senza tag. Ho inserito tag "water point".Devi aggiungere anche tag, altrimenti non si capisce nulla..
Đuro Jiří (2022-06-29 18:41:00+00:00): No,ho inserito tag "drinking water".
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
sugarbotond (2022-09-03 09:24:18+00:00): Szia ennek az utcának hivatalosan nincs neve: https://jarokelo.hu/bejelentesek/budapest/101745/utcanevtabla-nelkuli-kozterulet
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо
kartonage (2022-06-25 08:20:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully because it was vandalism/only mass deletions. Please refrain from mass deleting in OpenStreetMap. Thanks

автоматический перевод:
Этот набор изменений был полностью отменен, потому что это был вандализм / только массовые удаления. Пожалуйста, воздержитесь от массового удаления в OpenStreetMap. Спасибо