piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Skippern (2015-07-12 02:06:23+00:00): O Maquetarte (node:3641204929) tem somente nome, acho voce deve adicionar tipo de loja ou amenidade, ne?
LucFreitas (2015-07-12 12:14:40+00:00): Corrigido, obrigado.
Skippern (2015-07-12 13:56:11+00:00): Acho que ja comunicou pra voce, mas temos um bate-papo no irc://irc.oftc.net/#osm-br (sala #osm-br no IRC irc.oftc.net), seria bom se voce participando ai também :)
AgusQui (2015-07-11 20:52:34+00:00): No hace falta aclarar el viejo nombre en name, para eso está el tag old_name
jumagu (2015-07-12 01:21:07+00:00): El problema con esa calle es que tiene 2 nombres. El oficial es Concejal Candido Torlaschi y el no oficial es El Remanso
AgusQui (2015-07-12 01:32:42+00:00): Lo sé y ambos nombres están reflejados en los datos de OSM: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58821658
El verdadero problema es el municipio pedorro que tenemos, cambia de nombre a las calles y despues no se calienta en multar a los vecinos que no cambian la direccion de sus casas.
jumagu (2015-07-12 01:51:27+00:00): Perfecto, gracias por la ayuda
AgusQui (2015-07-12 01:57:44+00:00): Cualquier duda que tengas o ayuda para mapear avisá, si sos de Moreno en el foro hay un hilo con los avances: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=11733
Saludos.
mvexel (2021-05-07 18:47:23+00:00): "knowledge" is most likely wrong when adding 3800+ fire hydrants? I know this is an old changeset, but if you still have / know the actual source, could you please specify? Thanks
NebSgird (2023-09-04 14:11:10+00:00): Checked a bunch of these hydrants while doing other work, many don't exist or are other city utilities like electrical boxes and lightpoles. I'm not going to role it back, but someone should do a thorough review.
SomeoneElse (2023-09-16 10:41:45+00:00): Re "someone should do a thorough review" you might want to mention it at community.osm.org or in OSM US' Slack so that more people are aware of it.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-04-15 13:24:40+00:00): For info see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69235227 - I've moved the alleged tree to its former location and removed the wiki* links as they were for a nearby village, not the former tree.  Presumably some of the other edits in this changeset were just automatic and will need checking too...
5m4u9 (2015-07-09 03:27:31+00:00): idem que el anterior... revisar permisos de las fotos. sino tendemos que eliminar edición :-/
gorogoro (2015-07-10 17:27:48+00:00): En este caso, la información es totalmente de panoramio, por lo tanto, si, incumple los derechos de autor.
5m4u9 (2015-07-11 04:24:22+00:00): podemos esperar si logras conseguir autorización uso fotos para este fin.
gorogoro (2015-07-14 00:05:48+00:00): He mandado la solicitud, pero no tengo muchas esperanzas de respuesta; el usuario no esta activo desde 2007, tampoco ha respondido a otros usuarios mas recientemente. 
Por otro lado, se (corrígeme si no es así) que cuando un usuario carga fotos en los servicios de Google, estos se hacen propietario de las fotos. Así que por mas que él autorice, puede que Google, sea propietario de las mismas.
5m4u9 (2015-07-14 03:26:21+00:00): No se pierde nada intentando. Las licencias las eligen los usuarios y sólo google pide usarlas para mostrar en panoramio.
BCNorwich (2017-08-03 06:13:42+00:00): Way: 359424376
No need to advertise your inadequacies.
BCNorwich (2017-08-03 06:13:58+00:00): Way: 359424376
Deleted
GerdP (2015-11-27 08:47:24+00:00): Hi there!
I've noticed the rarely used tag highway=snowmobile
on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/359423451
and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230222252

Do these two ways have no "normal"
purpose? I would expect something like
highway=path (or track)
snowmobile=designated (or yes)
See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:snowmobile
eoosterhof (2015-12-15 19:42:23+00:00): No, these two ways have no "normal"
purpose. Impossible to walk here in the summerperiod.
GerdP (2015-12-15 21:02:34+00:00): OK, so you use highway=snowmobile
similar to bridleway or bicycleway?
GerdP (2015-12-16 03:58:18+00:00): I just saw that you removed the highway tag for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230222252
I did now the same for the other way and 
reverted my change reg. grade and added a note. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230222252
Nakaner (2015-07-18 09:48:33+00:00): Du weißt, dass du mit diesem Änderungssatz das Residential-Multipolygon von Dessau geschrottet hast? Bitte benutze JOSM, der überprüft deine Änderungen vor dem Upload!
CloCkWeRX (2017-01-25 03:38:27+00:00): This doesn't match imagery, or a lot of GPS traces from improve-osm - how certain are you of the GPS traces you used?
Chad Wamsley-Taylor (2017-01-27 03:20:49+00:00): you might want to check any "updated" satellite imagery. I personally travel on this road at least once per week. you are looking at old imagery of the old road before construction was completed. Road is still accessible to Mine personal, which could explain updated GPS traces, Public have no access. I have all our vehicles on GPS tracking with 100% coverage across this area, trust me.... Its Correct.
CloCkWeRX (2017-01-27 05:29:55+00:00): > Road is still accessible to Mine personal
Maybe that bit could be tagged with highway=service access=private or similar?

Are you able to upload your GPS traces into OSM by any chance?

The data in improveosm.org is fairly dense and recent - 2016-8-23 2:55:34, 9+ trips/50 gps points per tile.

You can view it at http://improveosm.org/#background=Bing&map=15.29/-22.1589/148.1578 (may have to navigate manually to the area, links seem to change on load, sigh)
CloCkWeRX (2017-01-27 05:34:31+00:00): Looking at non-free imagery, I can see the new road - I might just re-add the old one with appropriate tagging/notes
Chad Wamsley-Taylor (2017-01-27 05:37:35+00:00): The road has been physically blocked off at the northern end, so only accessible by mine authorized vehicles, GPS tracks could have been a external float carrying mine equipment in from mine site. road is all overgrown. can't upload our GPS tracks unfortunately.
Chad Wamsley-Taylor (2017-01-27 05:43:10+00:00): its also blocked off at the south, at Railway crossing, no Physical connection at either end to Peak Downs Mine Road
naoliv (2015-07-09 01:37:04+00:00): furuka, as casas não devem possuir nome de "minha casa"
Você pode representá-la com endereço, número ou nome se for um comércio, mas para casas não é correto ter nome.
ikiya (2015-07-09 23:33:20+00:00): Hello, Atozca.
Please write source of a image data.
はじめまして。 行政の境界を数多く編集されていますが、iDで編集に使っている背景の画像のsourceを書いて下さい。 よろしくお願いします。
ikiya (2015-07-09 23:33:07+00:00): Hello, Atozca.
Please write source of a image data.
はじめまして。 行政の境界を数多く編集されていますが、iDで編集に使っている背景の画像のsourceを書いて下さい。 よろしくお願いします。
ikiya (2015-07-09 23:32:46+00:00): Hello, Atozca.
Please write source of a image data.
はじめまして。 行政の境界を数多く編集されていますが、iDで編集に使っている背景の画像のsourceを書いて下さい。 よろしくお願いします。
ikiya (2015-07-09 23:32:32+00:00): Hello, Atozca.
Please write source of a image data.
はじめまして。 行政の境界を数多く編集されていますが、iDで編集に使っている背景の画像のsourceを書いて下さい。 よろしくお願いします。
ikiya (2015-07-09 23:32:19+00:00): Hello, Atozca.
Please write source of a image data.
はじめまして。 行政の境界を数多く編集されていますが、iDで編集に使っている背景の画像のsourceを書いて下さい。 よろしくお願いします。
ikiya (2015-07-09 23:32:05+00:00): Hello, Atozca.
Please write source of a image data.
はじめまして。 行政の境界を数多く編集されていますが、iDで編集に使っている背景の画像のsourceを書いて下さい。 よろしくお願いします。
ikiya (2015-07-09 23:31:35+00:00): Hello, Atozca.
Please write source of a image data.
はじめまして。 行政の境界を数多く編集されていますが、iDで編集に使っている背景の画像のsourceを書いて下さい。 よろしくお願いします。
FTA (2015-07-18 17:28:21+00:00): Hey there! Just wanted to drop in and say hello. I've been working on sidewalks and building tracing on the far west side, so it's good to see someone working on this in another part of town :). Cheers and Happy Mapping, Ethan aka FTA
MidwestMapGeek (2015-07-30 01:33:59+00:00): Hey! I wasn't ignoring you, it's just that I don't regularly check the email this would have gone to. I've noticed you working in Madison- you've really done a lot. Usually I see this kind of work as kind of tedious but sometimes I get in the mood for it, and it's easy to kind of go on autopilot when you're burnt out from other work on the map. Glad to see you sticking around and mapping! I generally pop around in a few areas in the state, and this is definitely one I come back to.
Supaplex (2015-07-09 05:44:36+00:00): 「上海市松江食品药品检验所」這種應該用amenity=administrative比較適當，amenity=townhall用在市政府、公所什麼的
Supaplex (2015-10-07 15:03:19+00:00): 請問這是認真的編輯嗎?
我已經先去掉了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34492765
Supaplex (2015-10-07 15:03:16+00:00): 請問這是認真的編輯嗎?
我已經先去掉了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34492765
Supaplex (2015-10-07 15:03:11+00:00): 請問這是認真的編輯嗎?
我已經先去掉了
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34492765
Peilscheibe (2015-07-09 08:18:35+00:00): Wegen dem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/359505403
Weißt Du, welches Verkehrszeichen draußen an der Straße steht? Weil, access=no sperrt den Weg auch für Fußgänger und Radfahrer und das ist eher selten der Fall.
majk (2015-07-09 08:39:43+00:00): Ist ein VZ250. Sehr prominent in die Mitte des Weges gepflanzt.
Gibt's einen besseren Tag als foot=yes? Weil wirklich geeignet ist der Weg für Fußgänger mangels Fortsetzung nicht.
Peilscheibe (2015-07-09 08:52:21+00:00): Zeichen 250 würde dann vehicle=no entsprechen. Mit der Eignung kann sich ja gerne der jeweilige Router auseinandersetzen ;-) , ich mache ggf. immer noch so Attribute wie surface, width oder gar sac_scale dran, wenn es schlimm wird ;-)
Mit sowas kann auch ein Router was anfangen wenn er will, auch mit dem Umstand, dass die Landesstraße keine Gehwege hat (sidewalk=none)
Peilscheibe (2015-07-09 13:35:39+00:00): In letzter Zeit hast Du einige Wege und Punkte verschoben. Ich nehme mal exemplarisch diesen hier heraus: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/269174033 Durch die Verschiebung liegt der Punkt jetzt deutlich außerhalb des verfügbaren GPS-Spurenbündels, d.h. von der Lage her falsch. Welche Informationen sind die Basis für Deine edits? Berücksichtigst Du grundsätzlich die Lage von verfügbaren GPS-Spuren oder Verzerrung und Lagefehler von Luftbildern?
fanzinies (2015-07-10 18:20:58+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe die Aufzeichnungen vom Stadtmessungsamt bekommen. Grüße
Peilscheibe (2015-07-15 14:24:13+00:00): Das ist ja interessant, was sind das denn für Daten? Kannst Du die veröffentlichen? Unter welcher Lizenz liegen die denn vor? Und warum sind die dann mehrere Meter neben der Realität?
literan (2015-07-09 10:46:08+00:00): @Забор вокруг стоянки автобусов@ - тег name - только для имен собственных!!!! подобные описания ставьте в тег description=

исправляю
literan (2015-07-09 10:47:01+00:00): а тег забора (barrier=fence) не поставили. И зачем тут area=yes? или заборами покрыта вся площадь стоянки, плотненько так? %-)
George Leo (2015-07-09 11:09:35+00:00): Спасибо за замечания. Вижу, что ты уже все поправил.
literan (2015-07-09 11:15:46+00:00): да, поправил :) На будущее, если будут вопросы - пиши, охотно отвечу.
RicoElectrico (2015-07-09 09:59:03+00:00): Czy w tym miejscu obsługuje się klientów?
A, i samo dodanie nazwy do punktu adresowego, bez podania typu miejsca nie ma większego sensu, wszystkie oprogramowania typu nawigacje i wyszukiwarki zignorują to.
fkv (2016-09-06 07:03:06+00:00): In http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/701795 hat jemand beanstandet, dass das Wort "Friedhof" falsch geschrieben ist ("Freidhof"). Es ist aber sowieso nicht der Name. Ein Name wär "Friedhof Rohrbach" oder "Bergfriedhof". Wenn er keinen Namen hat oder wenn du ihn nicht weißt, lass das Namensfeld leer, denn das Tag landuse=cemetery sagt sowieso schon, dass es ein Friedhof ist.
mict94 (2015-07-09 22:28:59+00:00): Du solltest nicht davon ausgehen, dass niemand diese Changesets überprüft.

Sofern du das nicht selbst machst, werde ich dieses Changeset reverten.
MaciekKolejKłodzko (2015-07-10 16:25:26+00:00): Cześć,

chodzi mi o drogę serwisową do budynku 44a w Starej Łomnicy- https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.34882/16.58419&layers=N . Czy usunięcie tag'u access: private było przypadkowe czy celowe?
RicoElectrico (2015-07-09 10:58:43+00:00): Proszę powiedzieć, czy w tym miejscu znajduje się fizyczny sklep?
Dodatkowo, zwykłe dodanie nazwy do punktu adresowego nie ma większego sensu, bo żaden program typu nawigacja czy wyszukiwarka nie będzie wiedział czym to jest. Brak typu obiektu jest niepoprawny.
felgeo (2015-07-09 11:09:56+00:00): Oczywiście, że tak - siedziba firmy Global Traders S.C prowadzącego sklep Felgeo.pl
Greenhorn58 (2015-07-13 05:20:17+00:00): U Zitadelle, Tunnelübergang mit Treppe eingefügt. Gehwege Am Juliusturm im Bereich U Zitadelle eingepflegt.
Govanus (2015-07-15 19:20:14+00:00): ok I just wote a very long essey about the tags that I need left and fetures I need to restore to make the systems I use that rely them to work and the deeaper phlosiphy behind the tags I'd used but moentarilly left the edit box an the text has just all been lost.  So I'll try it chunks or put into a diary edit instead.  I've been to repair the broken data links but my time is short and the diversion a waste of effort.
Govanus (2015-07-15 19:23:53+00:00): ok in chunked formed:-

I intended to promote OSM to the garage management teams of operators like the council, whose then system was relient on google and was so week that it had confusion-making location descrepancies on it.
Govanus (2015-07-15 19:26:07+00:00): next chunk:-
I did specific site surveys to collect the marks, numbers and and names on all the garages I've mannaged to put into osm plus other that ran out of time for.
Govanus (2015-07-15 19:34:31+00:00): next chunk:-
I use three fields to carry the name or number or assoiciated marks of garages and referances to teach OSM about the offical groupings and blocks used by operators to manage there garages stocks {this was to allow better data services on to the back processing of annotated website maps for customers to pick and find new garages to rent}

see:- 
http://www.oxford.gov.uk/PageRender/decH/GarageLocationsSouthfieldParkandStClements.htm
http://www.oxford.gov.uk/PageRender/decH/Garages_to_rent_occw.htm
and
https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=z0nFLiwzFNIc.kVKYCvg26Rew&msa=0&ll=51.754028,-1.230125&spn=0.103077,0.220757
Govanus (2015-07-15 19:44:09+00:00): next chunk:-
I use name correctly to give things phisicaly marked or written on the garages (in the same way I use the name tag when reley legend or symbols on parking spots {such as Owens Way (Way: ♿ (342095176)) })

A data sorter or renderer can filiter away these names if not requied by selecting out names from garage or parking space features.
     There are different common renders that do support named garages while others choose not to use them.
Govanus (2015-07-15 19:50:01+00:00): ok next chunk:-
I found some garages such as most Oxford city gargages have postal addresses, oftern with a variation to the name phisicaly on the garage (to avoid confusion with dwellings with similar numbers or names).

So where I can find these I add the appropriate regular address tags, including a addr:housename or addr:housenumber depending which looks most appropriate for the idividual garage [or bay of they ever come up the same way].
Govanus (2015-07-15 19:52:48+00:00): next chunk:-
finally I may have access to internal or customer faceing records that carry a referance number or other text string or symbols.  These I add to OSM in a normal ref tag; as is normal tag usage.
Govanus (2015-07-15 19:58:50+00:00): next chunk:-
Now as I use the tags based on the infomation found out about the site: I may have some tags unused where infomation is not confirmed (that might get included when it is found).
...and as the tags are chosen by purpose (not just variation) they may have the same or different values based on real-world usages, of them.
Govanus (2015-07-15 20:08:07+00:00): next chunk:-
I've foun it usefull to have the HGV Turning head clearly marked on maps as the concreate was originaly relaid with their need in mind, and it helps encorage lorries to use it rather than belive they will need to reverse for meny 100's of meters around tight bends (tighter since some awkward person mistook the road for a car park (originaly a banned process {delivary HGV's ruled}, then ignored by car parkers. Before being allowed in a semi-controled way)), and down a hill with children sometimes out playing too.

This is aspecially trure for those systems that don't render the areas well so not installing confidence into dispatch and drives alike.
Govanus (2015-07-15 20:24:10+00:00): After a lot of debate there seem to be two settled camps of thought on areaised highways entered into OSM (yes spent a lot of effort trying to the one true path but it isn't there in way I expected).

Some think they should be like other features that get an area=yes tag included to higlight they are area ways and not linear ways.  While some think special tags should be used  to more easily highlight the relationship between the midway routeing line and the areas by forming a new area:x style tag to form k=area:highway.  Sometimes linked with this is the practice of K-nodeing witch which with the right rendering program  can developed stop, giveway and simlar features markable on the road (I've been wondering how this works with advanced stop lines that allow bycycles to get to the front of the lights to turn easier accross the taffic flow when its slow or stopped (ithink the secret is in the cycle lane areaising like an L with two effective k-points of natually differing widths),
an example where I've prepared for this is at:-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342095176#map=19/51.75492/-1.25387

on the crossroads just outside the King's Arms pub.
Govanus (2015-07-15 20:30:35+00:00): next chunk:-
So prep the routeing line to give a currently blank(latter to be tagged-up) k-point and then adopt both the area=yes feature method and the area:highway tag system (that will learn to use more of when I look at more on street area details to enter)
this approach is in the wiki along side info on k-points see the links bounceing about oxford high street for more details on this.
Govanus (2015-07-15 20:42:46+00:00): Finally I've adopted a new highway tag that I explained in a wiki page before using in appropriate places.
this the highway=manoeuvring_forecourt that use for a place that is like a turning_circle, a parking_aisle (service), a driveway (service) and a yard but as it blends the other roles or is enclosed (unlike a parking_aisle (service)) it isn't clearly explaned by any other them individually, and as osm dosn't like me to dump multiple versions of the highway tag into one feature I developed a the new manoeuvring_forecourt to cover it.  manoeuvring_forecourt's also oftern have implied parking and loading rules that can be better expressed on a map with some clear differntiation, so I made the wiki page and started to use it.  Now I tought of making a type of service but I had thought if turning_circles get top level then so should manoeuvring_forecourt's.
Before you say they aren't supported the Humanitairian renderer dose support them as an all black feature.  So they are recognised as a highway type.
Govanus (2015-07-15 20:44:26+00:00): Ok I out of time so I'll fiish up about the indoor problems and lugging a desktop to a public libary to be able to use josm when id and portlatch failed me will be tomorrows continuation.
zors1843 (2015-07-10 06:52:26+00:00): New way on existing ways, creating duplicates.
Hjart (2015-07-09 22:26:04+00:00): Hej
Jeg kan se du i en del tilfælde har forbundet diverse polygoner (i dette tilfælde p-pladser) med vejnettet (highway=*). Dette besværliggør arbejdet for de (desværre ret få) af os der foretager fejlrettelser og finpudsning af vejnettet i større stil. Desuden øger det risikoen for fejl betragteligt (specielt når mindre erfarne folk senere forsøger at lave ændringer i området). Så derfor vil jeg bede dig så vidt muligt at holde diverse polygoner (parking, landuse etc) adskilt fra vejnettet.

Tak
ratrun (2015-08-16 14:47:08+00:00): Please migrate the trail into a walking relation.
KKS (2015-07-09 13:35:47+00:00): Промітив O-062030, попутно більш продеталізувавши дорогу, в базовому вигляді точки були за кілометр одна від іншої
StefanB (2018-04-06 07:26:52+00:00): Hey, this veterinary is in the middle of the adriatic sea!
OpenBrian (2015-07-09 14:02:08+00:00): Typo: Added Sugar Shack Donuts.
flohoff (2015-07-09 15:55:58+00:00): Hi,
in NRW dürfen wir das ALKIS verwenden. D.h. wir können die Gebäude exakt aus dem Liegenschaftskataster übernehmen. Das was du da jetzt geändert hast passt nicht so wirklich zu den tatsächlichen outlines.

Flo
ma-rt-in (2015-07-09 15:56:43+00:00): Naja vorher sah es aber auch nicht besser aus.
literan (2015-07-10 11:29:12+00:00): номер стоянки это не name!!! а ref=!!!

name (по-английски имя, название) - это имя собственное.
SomeoneElse (2016-02-25 00:48:43+00:00): Not sure what happened here, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/359608480/history was a large building in the middle of the South Pacific.  I've deleted it.
Lukas Krauter (2015-07-09 15:15:04+00:00): i accidently commited this :/
skorasaurus (2015-07-10 01:53:05+00:00): thanks for tracing, but Girard Street no longer exists. I live less than a km from here and I've past thi location plenty of times. There's no street sign to say it's a road either. 

See here for an image. http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SfJKP8BMy94LnEoTy_2Yaw
samely (2015-07-10 02:24:46+00:00): Hey there. Thanks for your feedback, I've already removed Girard Street. See: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32533422
RicoElectrico (2015-07-09 15:57:28+00:00): Światowit, czyli co dokładnie? Obecnie do budynku jest dodana nazwa i tyle. Trzeba dodać jakiś typ obiektu (np. sklep/restauracja/cokolwiek).
RicoElectrico (2015-07-09 16:27:40+00:00): Przepraszam, zwracam honor :P
Z jakiegoś powodu ikonka hotelu się nie pokazała... Jest dobrze.
Firefishy (2015-07-10 15:59:32+00:00): Great first edit. Any additional local knowledge greatly appreciated. Happy to answer any questions.
roger@coffeebay (2015-07-10 16:16:14+00:00): Thanks Firefishy. I see on the map there is a node and bed icon but no name. How do I go about getting the name "Geckos B & B" to appear next to the icon?
Regards - Roger@coffeebay
RicoElectrico (2015-07-09 16:05:33+00:00): Nie ma potrzeby jednocześnie nazywania budynku i POI. Jeśli już, to można scalić budynek i POI w jeden obiekt (tak, że tagi POI przeniesie się na budynek).
Możesz natomiast powiedzieć skąd wyrysowane są obrysy budynku? Bo ja nie widzę ich ani na zdjęciach Bing ani Geoportalu. Rysowanie "na oko" nie ma sensu (mądrzy ludzie powiedzieliby: jest niekartometryczne) i kwalifikuje się do skasowania.
Pomijając to, budynki posiadające kąty proste zawsze prostujemy klawiszem S!
Jeśli masz jakieś pytania, to napisz na forum - http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
Nie gryziemy ;-)
Mariucha (2015-07-09 19:27:29+00:00): tego budynku nie ma jeszcze nigdzie naniesionego jeszcze rok temu było tam "ściernisko" :). Wydaje mi się że lepiej narysować coś na oko żeby było widać że już jest, a jak będzie już "sfotografowane" to nanieś poprawki (zresztą zdjęcia satelitarne też są robione pod kątem i nie są idealne)
RicoElectrico (2015-07-10 10:32:05+00:00): Sceptycznie jestem do tego nastawiony. Budynki nie są "obowiązkową" informacją, to znaczy da się bez nich żyć (nie, to nie jest nigdzie zapisane - raczej wynika ze zdrowego rozsądku).

Kiedy wybudowali dwa nowe bloki, to poszedłem z GPS-em i zrobiłem przybliżone, ale jednak pomiary. Błąd wymiarów max 10%, położenia 5 m. (sprawdziłem z późniejszymi zdjęciami lotniczymi).

Tutaj 5 m mają te wcięcia w rogach. Nie mów mi, że masz teodolit i dalmierz w oku ;-)
BCNorwich (2017-07-24 05:42:27+00:00): removing several duplicated wood areas
MikeN (2015-07-09 16:46:28+00:00): Hi, thank you for the contribution to OpenStreetMap.   Please clarify what was being added - the additions appear to be untagged.   Thank you,
Nick D'Amato (2015-07-13 12:44:24+00:00): This is technically a "Brownfield"; however I could not find that designation.  So, I copied the designation "Industrial - disaster" as used for the Love Canal superfund site in New York, since that is a fairly well-known site.