piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Chenshi (2019-03-30 10:12:33+00:00): ich wusste das sowas kommt. meine grundeinstellung ist das nicht! leg mir das nicht in den mund! ich kann aber schon dinge getrennt betrachten, und solch eine straße in bau, da hab ich ernsthafte zweifel das jemals jemand etwas dagegen hat, das wir das jetzt schon eintragen. und die zustimmung zum eintragen hatten wir ja auch bekommen, oh wunder! jetzt aber den changeset (aus trotz) zu reverten ist groben undank an meine mitarbeit.
gscscnd (2019-03-18 07:43:55+00:00): building=industrial, man_made=mineshaft, więcej na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=mineshaft
PT-53 (2019-03-18 06:02:02+00:00): Hallo se7time,
was ist die Quelle für Deine Änderungen?
Fragende Grüße
se7entime (2019-03-18 08:03:24+00:00): hi PT-53, im sorry i don't understand what you speak, but if you ask why i change the amenity to "social_facility", its because i do the MapRoulette Challenge this https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/2879

The description of challenge:
"Many retirement home around the world still use the deprecated tag retirement_home (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dretirement_home) instead of the new tag social_facility (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:social_facility). This challenge should fix those social facilities."
PT-53 (2019-03-18 08:29:03+00:00): Und wie überprüfst Du ob Deine Änderungen korrekt sind?
Fragende Grüße

And how do you check if your changes are correct?
Asking greetings
se7entime (2019-03-18 08:33:40+00:00): have you read the wiki link above? i do the instruction given by "challenge creator" to change the deprecated OSM tag (in this case 'retirement_home' to 'social_facility')

"Please consider using the newer tagging amenity=social_facility + social_facility=assisted_living + social_facility:for=senior instead. As of 13/7/2018 there are 2301 objects with social_facility=assisted_living and any kind of social_facility:for=* (i.e. roughly the same usage numbers)."
source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dretirement_home

*correct me if im wrong
PT-53 (2019-03-18 09:08:27+00:00): Du änderst Merkmale ohne vorher zu prüfen, ob die Merkmale korrekt waren? 
Bist Du Dir sicher, daß social_facility=assisted_living korrekt ist?

You change traits without first checking whether the traits were correct? 
Are you sure that social_facility=assisted_living is correct?
se7entime (2019-03-18 09:24:47+00:00): EN: i'I am pretty sure because that is what the wiki says to use social_facility = assisted_living and social_facility: for senior instead of amenity = retirement_home, if I have found the social_facility and or social_facility: for tags then I will not change it (but it seems that something has been missed by me, accidentally),

so ... is it more "safe" just by changing amenity = retirement_home to amenity = social_facility without the need to add the tag social_facility and social_facility: for?

Thank you in advance

ID: saya cukup yakin karena itu yang tertera di wiki untuk menggunakan social_facility=assisted_living dan social_facility:for=senior sebagai pengganti amenity=retirement_home, jika sebelumnya saya sudah menemukan tag social_facility dan atau social_facility:for maka saya tidak akan mengubahnya (tapi sepertinya ada yg pernah terlewat oleh saya, tidak sengaja),

jadi... apakah lebih "aman" hanya dengan mengubah amenity=retirement_home ke amenity=social_facility tanpa perlu menambahkan tag social_facility dan social_facility:for ?

Terima kasih sebelumnya
Claudius Henrichs (2019-03-18 09:57:04+00:00): I verified that it is an assisted living home:
https://www.wohnen-im-alter.de/einrichtung/pflegeheim/schemmerhofen/wohnpark-st-klara-23564
PT-53 (2019-03-18 10:01:19+00:00): Ohne eine Überprüfung sollte überhaupt keine Änderung vorgenommen werden!

Without a check no change should be made at all!
thetornado76 (2019-03-18 18:44:13+00:00): Im Wiki wird um die neue Methode gebeten. Social_facility ist viel spezifischer als retirement_home, so dass kontrolliert werden muss, welcher der neuen tags der passende ist. Oft kann dies am Namen abgelesen werden oder über die Homepage. Wenn es nicht eindeutig ist, sollte der alte Wert beibehalten werden.

The Wiki asks for the new method. Social_facility is much more specific than retirement_home, so you need to control which of the new tags is the appropriate one. Often this can be read from the name or from the homepage. If it is not unique, the old value should be retained.
b-jazz (2019-03-20 16:09:54+00:00): Hi RileyBaum, I made some improvements to your parking lot area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677521666). Let me know what you think.
achantav (2019-07-11 09:02:42+00:00): Hi alzyee, 

Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Its a mistake from my side for adding service roads on a foot path. Thanks for making the changes. We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.

Regards,
achantav
gscholz (2019-04-14 08:51:40+00:00): Hi mcheck,
this changeset has created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-57.23673&lat=-25.48547&zoom=16

Can you please fix this?

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2019-06-02 06:34:40+00:00): Hi mcheck, 
these errors still exits. Can you please take over your responsibility and fix them?
Guido
gscholz (2019-11-16 08:13:56+00:00):  Hi mcheck,
 these errors still exits. Can you please respond to this request, take over your responsibility and fix them?
Guido
gscholz (2020-01-01 12:08:12+00:00): Hi mcheck,
these errors still exits. Can you please respond to this request, take over your responsibility and fix them?
Guido
gscholz (2020-01-01 12:10:08+00:00): Hi mcheck, 
questi errori esistono ancora. Potete rispondere a questa richiesta, assumervi la responsabilità e risolverli?
Guido
abakus_uploader (2019-03-18 23:30:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Supaplex (2019-09-08 01:33:03+00:00): 您好：

開放街圖的資料是完全公開存取的，而且只記錄具公共性的事務，所以您提供含有私人資訊的註記，並不適合被編輯到地圖中。
Rasterfarian89 (2019-05-20 21:09:38+00:00): Fixing an incorrect names placed on features. Please refrain for corrupting the data by adding your name to features. Many communities rely on the accuracy of OSM data.
viloan (2019-03-18 00:08:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_514683 (2019-03-19 03:24:37+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your contributions.
My only suggestion: the official names of things like streets in China should be in Chinese with Chinese characters. Other languages, such as English, as well as things like Pinyin transcriptions should be tagged with a language tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr#Multilingual_Addresses

That being said, 'Ferguson Lane' might be the official name of the building - you'll know better than me about that.
mvonweis (2019-03-19 03:43:13+00:00): You're right. Unfortunately my grasp of Chinese is insufficient and capturing local names is very time-consuming so I usually just ignore that.

I'll tag the language now and then check next time whether there's a local name. It may very well be that the proper name is in English in this particular case.
Milancer (2019-04-29 17:49:36+00:00): Ahoj, část silnice I/11 v obci Dlouhopolsko je nahrazena ulicí. Je to jen chybka nebo je tam opravdu nějaké omezení?
Díky.
Minimalis (2019-04-29 19:31:57+00:00): Ahoj, díky za upozornění. Chyba vznikla při zpřesňování cest z ruian. Už jsem to opravil.
zpw32 (2019-03-18 03:11:23+00:00): No satellite imagery makes this mapping difficult.  Improved satellite imagery will make this more accurate
Rasterfarian89 (2019-05-20 21:06:54+00:00): Fixing an incorrect names placed on features. Please refrain for corrupting the data by adding your name to features. Many communities rely on the accuracy of OSM data.
user_5359 (2019-03-18 05:59:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
Supaplex (2019-04-07 14:44:59+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站   http://www.openstreetmap.tw (暫時下架)
OSM.TW 備份站 https://assanges.github.io/osmtw-ghpage/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
aharvey (2019-04-09 01:13:46+00:00): FYI I deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677568453 since it was already mapped by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/646291757
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:18:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:19:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:19:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:19:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:19:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:19:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:19:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:19:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
user_5359 (2019-03-18 18:04:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your node. Please use lowercase key name.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-30 16:06:50+00:00): Can you check that the wikidata Q190464 on the HSBC in here is actually correct (i.e. the object is not a retail bank)?
Best Regards,
Andy
treestryder (2019-03-18 14:41:07+00:00): Just so you know, in the Lansing area, I have found the recent Mapbox imagery to be the most recent and best aligned (offset) with the map. Though, it was taken during last year's flooding, so some of the areas along the rivers are literally “washed out”.
More about imagery offsets here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing
Zhan-na Reed (2019-03-19 16:46:44+00:00): I'm new comer and a little bit confused. Did you mean the image alignment error is considered small enough to be ignored? Or it is worthy to correct the minor difference? (The "Good practice" says such errors are tolerable, while you said the imagery is now well-aligned or trustworthy, but mis-alignment exists). Thanks.
goldfndr (2019-06-01 23:29:35+00:00): Most of these, if not all, are vacant (although many do still have their old signage); the main exception being the fuel station. They should not have had their shop or amenity tags restored/duplicated.
goldfndr (2019-06-01 23:48:59+00:00): Corrected via Changeset #70845599
Joxit (2019-05-29 12:54:27+00:00): Hi, why did you delete this node ? 
As said here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
"Node representing where to draw the label. May be useful when there's an enclave or the boundary has a large concavity, and the default placement of the label in the center of the bounding box would fall completely outside the boundary area."

With the area, we can not have an optimal placement for the label (when we work on cartography).
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-29 17:24:58+00:00): From what I see (for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/424313760/history#map=3/64.96/-76.11 ), "would fall completely outside the boundary area" is not a problem.

Note also "label in the center of the bounding box" is the stupidest possible algorithm and there is plenty of smarter ones.

In general label role is explicit manual label placement - and preferable label placement will differ depending on a map, single position will not keep everybody happy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-29 17:26:59+00:00): And to answer

> Hi, why did you delete this node ? 

Because labels are not mappable objects and mapping country as area is preferable

Also placement of this nodes is optimized for specific map styles, making them form of tagging for the renderer.
Joxit (2019-05-30 18:36:24+00:00): I'm not against the fact that it's easy to get a point from a polygon, (there are ST_Centroid or ST_PointOnSurface with postgis), in my quote they said "May be useful" that doesn't mean "must be used only in these cases".

IMHO, this node was a better placement than the current one on OSM.

If I understand what you are saying, your are suggesting that all other 219 country labels + hundreds of states in OSM are wrong and should be deleted? Because they are not mappable objects and using area is preferable ?

Are you planning a huge deletion of all label nodes ?

Sorry for all these questions, I like OSM and how it works, but and want to avoid this kind of breaking changes. It was a 10 year old node, and if they all disappear overnight, it would be nice for the community to know it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-30 21:02:12+00:00): > Are you planning a huge deletion of all label nodes ?

No. Though I recently deleted country node for Poland. IIRC I proposed (as it was an edit bordering on automatic one) deletion of nodes for lower levels of administrative boundaries in Poland. I am not remembering what was outcome of this discussion.

> Sorry for all these questions

No problem at all.

>  your are suggesting that all other 219 country labels + hundreds of states in OSM are wrong and should be deleted? Because they are not mappable objects and using area is preferable ?

Yes.
Joxit (2019-05-30 22:27:59+00:00): Ok, I see... Since I haven't seen any approved proposal for such a feature, could you stop these deletions ? At least do not go out of Poland ?

Some people and software are using this information and can be very important to them. If you do not agree with something, think of others... OSM is not just yours.

>  Also, never use a vote result as a justification for large-scale re-tagging of existing objects (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal_process)
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-30 23:21:08+00:00): I mentioned discussion (not vote) because it is mandatory for automatic edits - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct#Document_and_discuss_your_plans
Joxit (2019-05-31 02:19:34+00:00): Ok, do you have the link of your discussion about this? I checked your threads and didn't find it in talk archives
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-31 14:34:51+00:00): This mentioned discussion was on https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 ended in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=WikiProject_Poland/Podzia%C5%82_administracyjny&diff=1548034&oldid=1413567 and it is happened on https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=679376
Joxit (2019-05-31 15:48:12+00:00): Ok, thanks, the discussion was only on Polish forum. It means that the change on Canada is not really legitimate.
I reverted your changes.

> if your edit affects only one country or territory then standard communication methods for the territory affected by the change - typically national-language mailing lists or forum

Anyway, I will make sure that I do not get caught out when this kind of situation happens.

Happy mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-31 17:34:40+00:00): The discussion was about "IIRC I proposed (as it was an edit bordering on automatic one) deletion of nodes for lower levels of administrative boundaries in Poland." and was not about this edit.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-31 17:35:19+00:00): And I mentioned it because you asked "Are you planning a huge deletion of all label nodes ?"
BCNorwich (2019-03-31 07:03:17+00:00): Hello,
In this changeset you have deleted 70 features mostly these are highways including Inamaluwa-Sigiriya Road. This is extremely disruptive to the map of Sri Lanka.

Because you have removed so much data and all the associated history data I think it would be best to revert this changeset entirely. This unfortunately means you would lose the features you added. But this is the only way to reinstate the deleted highways with their history intact.

A reversion must be done quickly before to many other changes are made involving associated features, (minimising conflicts of data). I can do the reverting if you wish, please respond ASAP?

Regards Bernard.
mavl (2019-07-21 14:19:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Zhent (2019-05-19 08:40:49+00:00): You mapped the entire coal terminal as a building. Deleting.
Øukasz (2020-01-03 10:37:38+00:00): Hello,

why have you removed the capital tag? Is Serdash not a subdistrict capital anymore?

thank you
vani_paru (2019-08-21 09:15:19+00:00): "Hi Adiatma IRM-RV,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the
way 356693137
way 356693135
way 356693133
classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'residential'. 

Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance."
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-08-21 09:47:39+00:00): Hello vani_paru. How are you?
I already change those ways into residential.
Thank you & happy mapping!
Joseph E (2019-03-18 13:04:34+00:00): I don't see these two rivers in the Bing aerial imagery that you listed as a source, and I don't think I can see them from the nearby hill in Sentani. Did you base this off of some other aerial imagery?
eggie (2019-03-18 09:47:56+00:00): De naam van De Tsjonger of De Kuunder heb ik maar ook verwijderd van het vlak. 
MVG,
Eggie
Glassman (2019-03-18 14:28:06+00:00): It looks like you deleted and then added the subway and chiropractor back in at a new position. You could have just moved the node. Moving the node save the history of the object. No real harm in what you did, but it is nice to retain the history. If they were two different business then it would make sense. If you have any questions, just ask. Have fun.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68249661
Omnific (2019-03-18 16:00:57+00:00): Hey, the edits look good. A note for future additions of store hours, here's the nomenclature to ensure that they can be properly read by programs: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
coshiro1 (2019-03-18 16:52:34+00:00): Okay, thanks!
eggie (2019-03-18 09:36:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Polarbear (2020-05-11 14:19:01+00:00): Hi geozeisig, du hast hier ein Stück 'outer' des Tegeler Forsts als 'heritage' getaggt. Was ggf. etwas anderes gemeint?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23366990/history
Viele Grüsse
geozeisig (2020-05-12 05:58:02+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Hab es korrigiert. Genau weiß ich es natürlich nicht mehr wie es passiert ein könnte.
Gruß Geozeisig
Farras (2019-04-13 18:11:52+00:00): Halo, mbak Silvia. Sebagian perubahan di dalam changeset ini (penghapusan jalan Pakuwon City [tidak sengaja?]) saya kembalikan seperti semula karena jalannya benar-benar ada. Terima kasih atas perhatiannya.
adiatmad (2019-04-15 01:20:04+00:00): Saya tertarik bergabung diskusi karena lokasinya dekat kantor lama dulu. Daerah sini memang masih aktif pembangunan perumahan baru. Saya setuju dengan Mas Farras, ada baiknya sebelum menghapus konfirmasi dulu dengan citra yang dipakai mapper sebelumnya atau jika meragukan bisa bertanya dulu via diskusi. Terima kasih.
Silvia IRM-ED (2019-04-18 01:43:48+00:00): Oke. terimakasih Mas Farras dan Mas Adiatmad
eggie (2019-03-18 09:40:22+00:00): Dag 997,

Tip: Probeer in principe op de naam op de waterway=stream te zetten
Als deze er niet is kun je 'm intekenen. 
De naam zal dan ook anders renderen. 
Een waterway altijd in de richting van het gemaal intekenen.
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2019-07-21 14:19:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.