piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Greg_Rose (2020-12-17 23:48:50+00:00): No motorways here!
Pas d'autoroutes ici!
nevw (2020-12-20 02:39:42+00:00): Hi
I noticed that OSM Inspector sees a duplicate segment here
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.01806&lat=-27.45213&zoom=18
reubot (2020-12-22 00:22:27+00:00): Thanks, I removed the offending way from the relation.
SCHLUMPFs (2020-12-16 03:31:22+00:00): My good lad I am pretty certain Durham does not stretch form 'straya to the canuck great lakes. Thank you for your service nonetheless.
SomeoneElse (2020-12-16 08:25:17+00:00): Sorry about the incorrect changeset comment above.  It should have been:
Reverting some inappropriate Golf-themed edits across two continents.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4614 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4589 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11890137 for more details.
eggie (2020-12-19 11:41:51+00:00): Dag Koen.. Lijkt mij oke.. Nog toevallig gecheckt of het westelijke fietspad nog bestaat langs de Enschedesestraat?

MVG,
eggie
Koen Zomers (2020-12-21 15:51:45+00:00): Yes, zojuist overheen gereden. Erg mooi geworden. Fietspad vanuit Oldenzaal richting Enschede aan de westkant bestaat nog gewoon en is alleen bedoeld voor fietsers richting het zuiden.
Koen Zomers (2020-12-21 15:52:13+00:00): Er is tevens een nieuwe doorsteek gemaakt tussen de Gerard Hollinkstraat en dit fietspad. Zal deze als een aparte changeset indienen.
Koen Zomers (2020-12-21 15:59:09+00:00): Change is ingediend. Zie wel dat op het fietspad links nog een ref F35c hangt. De F35 fietssnelweg is juist aan de rechterkant van de Enschedesestraat. De linkerkant is niet de F35.
eggie (2020-12-21 16:10:04+00:00): Gewoon proberen.. Ik kijk zo wel even.
gr eggie
eggie (2020-12-21 16:30:31+00:00): Die ref=F35c heb ik naar de oostzijde gelegd, maar die snelfietstak van de F35 naar Oldenzaal moet nog helemaal ingelegd worden.
Up to the routeexperts.
eggie (2020-12-16 07:29:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
MeneerPeer (2020-12-16 17:28:30+00:00): Heel erg bedankt! Deze gebouwen zijn reeds voltooid en bewoond.
Frans S (2020-12-16 13:26:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Experenced mappers, validators, review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor. This is an issue which still has to be solved.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)


See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95906929
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:22:21+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:22:11+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:22:03+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:21:52+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
mullica_q (2020-12-16 02:03:11+00:00): Used Strava for alignment in addition to Maxar Premium Imagery.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:21:34+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
DaveF (2020-12-18 19:55:30+00:00): Hi
The railway station is already mapped.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885336130#map=19/53.70470/-0.87444
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:21:00+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:20:49+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:20:39+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:20:23+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-05 02:44:55+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142168920
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:20:07+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:19:59+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:19:49+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
DressyPear4 (2020-12-16 03:30:52+00:00): Olá, atenção ao adicionar várias tags aos elementos, pesquise na wiki a melhor combinação delas.
Aqui você disse que essa estação de tratamento é na verdade um rio.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95907960
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-07 00:19:40+00:00): Restore reversion done in error 
    • Changeset #142251971
mariotomo (2020-12-16 17:28:27+00:00): hola Didiel. veo que has añadido "natural=shingle", me parece una propuesta válida, no la quieres validar con el grupo, para ponernos todos en linea?
mariotomo (2020-12-16 17:30:54+00:00): otros maperos utilizan "waterway=riverbank".  en otras partes indicamos la ocupación "natural=water", y tenemos maperos que cambian el riverbank.  es común utilizar "intermittent=yes" para las áreas inundables.
Frans S (2020-12-16 13:27:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Experenced mappers, validators, review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor. This is an issue which still has to be solved.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)


See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95908769
SomeoneElse (2020-12-16 08:25:31+00:00): Sorry about the incorrect changeset comment above.  It should have been:
Reverting some inappropriate Golf-themed edits across two continents.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4614 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4589 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11890137 for more details.
Irma IRM-ED (2021-05-31 03:33:20+00:00): Hi Kam17, 
Thanks for your digitizing.
Now I am validating multi-polygon relations and I find that there are multi polygon relations that are not quite right.
please check
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/885349558
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Alanduse%3Dresidential
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
I will delete the multi-polygon relation which is not quite right.
Thanks again!
Irma IRM-ED (2021-05-31 04:09:32+00:00): Hi Kam17,
Thanks for digitizing,
Now I am validating multi-polygon relations and I find that there are multi-polygon relations that are not quite right.
please check
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/885349558
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Alanduse%3Dresidential
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
I will delete the multipolygon relation which is not quite right.
Thanks again!
Irma IRM-ED (2021-05-31 04:12:51+00:00): Hi Kam17,
Thanks for digitizing,
Now I am validating multi-polygon relations and I find that there are multi-polygon relations that are not quite right.
please check
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/885353953
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Alanduse%3Dresidential
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
I will delete the multipolygon relation which is not quite right.
Thanks again!
Supaplex (2021-04-17 06:48:55+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse (2020-12-16 08:25:43+00:00): Sorry about the incorrect changeset comment above.  It should have been:
Reverting some inappropriate Golf-themed edits across two continents.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4614 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4589 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11890137 for more details.
Frans S (2020-12-16 13:16:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Experenced mappers, validators, review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor. This is an issue which still has to be solved.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)


See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95911925
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 15:43:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764618349/history has RT = 001 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
user_5359 (2020-12-22 06:27:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/845519799: Is the admin_level value correct?
DUGA (2021-05-06 12:58:02+00:00): Please avoid using source tag.

imagery_used tag will clearly record everything, there is no need to duplicate.

Since different editors will use different sources in the future, the tag you initially created may cause confusion if others do not check history.
Dimacn (2020-12-16 09:09:36+00:00): Почему вы удалили все газоны? Их нет в реальности? И у вас ошибка: дворовые проезды по жилым зонам обозначаются тегами highway=service + living_street=yes . Подробнее здесь - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
Frans S (2020-12-16 13:18:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Experenced mappers, validators, review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor. This is an issue which still has to be solved.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)


See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95912366
FreedSky (2020-12-17 03:45:27+00:00): 调图文件 经常乱写大哥，别乱改了
FreedSky (2020-12-17 03:45:56+00:00): 调图文件 写过京沪高速 京沪客专等多种写法。
FreedSky (2020-12-17 03:49:53+00:00): 这里用了客里表的名字。 类似例子 京张高速线和 京包客专
user_11435438 (2020-12-17 14:58:06+00:00): 客里表本身也是经常修改的，沪蓉线就改过很多次了，而且目前客里表上面也不是沪蓉线而是宁蓉线，这个您也没按照客里表是吧。不是很能理解为何您对本线如此执着。小道消息讲，在工务上是分为杭甬高速、甬温等多条线路的，不过我也没看到过工务泄露的文件无法证实。不过既然这次调图也用了这个名字，我就更倾向使用这个名字。而且350客运专线和250客货混跑的线路合并在一起本来就很奇怪不是吗？
FreedSky (2020-12-28 15:16:39+00:00): 沪蓉线也是一样的例子，另外泰州铁塔公众号发过一张非常完整的路局图就看得出来。工务是一整条。 
沪蓉线客里表还是用宁蓉线。
为啥执着呢？就看杭深线在客里表里面名字变了两次，沪昆线和客里表起点是上海我就觉得不能以客里表为主。

客里表的特点经常变。
FreedSky (2020-12-28 15:18:17+00:00): https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/zUbaFYtnxu7r3DRl29BQfQ
FreedSky (2020-12-28 15:18:50+00:00): 杭深线 在客里表最早叫 沪深线。
FreedSky (2020-12-28 15:21:18+00:00): 客里表本身也是经常修改，意味着OSM也要经常跟着修改，工务算是最稳定的了。
客里表本身服务客运计费，没有客运段的线路都没有名分，很多奇怪叫法的线路是客里表为了方便算价格取得，实际可能都没这个线路，比如温州南附近的那个线路。
FreedSky (2020-12-28 15:22:44+00:00): 用客里表，还有共线一个问题。不可避免的很多共线区域你要猜了，比如枢纽里面怎么走的。
user_11435438 (2020-12-31 03:37:05+00:00): 我也十分赞成使用工务的线路，奈何工务资料很难找。既然可以明确工务称之为杭深线，那我就没意见了，达成共识。
SomeoneElse (2020-12-16 08:25:56+00:00): Sorry about the incorrect changeset comment above.  It should have been:
Reverting some inappropriate Golf-themed edits across two continents.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4614 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4589 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=11890137 for more details.
Mateusz Konieczny - paid mapping (2020-12-16 08:39:00+00:00): Thanks for work on keeping vandalism outside OSM database!
salve100 (2020-12-16 14:20:18+00:00): Thanks SomeoneElse_Revert!!!
DP24PH (2020-12-17 04:53:12+00:00): Thank you very much for keeping OSM free from vandalism.
ndm (2020-12-17 20:08:41+00:00): Your changeset says Bing Imagery -- but the edit doesn't match it at all -- seems very odd.

Will redraw.
Miguel Pedr (2020-12-22 04:52:21+00:00): Hola,
Anteriormente, la dirección proporcionada por usted es correcta y después de unos días ha eliminado la dirección aquí que causó el efecto de enrutamiento en el cruce, aquí puede hacer las ediciones que son incompetentes y devolver las direcciones.Siempre tenga cuidado al asignar direcciones y Modelado del tráfico de cruce para obtener buenos datos de mapas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95913507
EuljiRo (2020-12-23 01:11:52+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thank you for looking into this and reaching out. I was previously worried about potentially blocking u-turns for the dual carriageway with these one ways. But, after closer review, I do see that road wear in imagery does support the one ways here, so I’ll add these one ways back.
Traducción:
Hola Miguel Pedr, Gracias por investigar y comunicarte. Anteriormente me preocupaba la posibilidad de bloquear los giros en U para la autovía con estos únicos caminos. Pero, después de una revisión más detallada, veo que el desgaste de la carretera en las imágenes respalda las únicas formas aquí, así que agregaré estas formas atrás.
mariotomo (2020-12-17 14:59:18+00:00): hola! recién empezaste con OSM? tenemos un grupo Telegram para coordinarnos, estamos planeando una reunión virtual para principio de año, tenemos forum y nos apoyamos a la mailing list talk-latam. conoces nuestras páginas wiki?
DaxServer (2021-01-22 13:10:20+00:00): Hi. The changes included here correspond to railway tracks. I'd advise putting appropriate changeset comments. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95915467
VLD262 (2021-01-22 18:14:37+00:00): Hi Srihari,

Thank you so much for correcting, here i have found overlapping of highway and rail features, so i have corrected the data by adding bridge tag. Will ensure the comment is specified precisely.
Thank you
ndm (2020-12-17 11:07:25+00:00): Reverted and redrawn -- you need to adjust your imagery offsets to match the existing map data, i.e. existing buildings. Or move every single building to match your new imagery.
ssnjan (2020-12-17 12:22:04+00:00): Hi Ndm, 
Thanks for your feedback I apologise for the miss from my end, I will make sure to check on these feature in my future edits. Thanks for correcting my edits. Always happy to learn from community.
Regards,
ssnjan
Gallizenae (2020-12-28 09:04:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885390289/history is not a motorway, please fix it.
user_5359 (2020-12-17 19:37:10+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on way https://www.osm.org/way/209342752, https://www.osm.org/way/209342756 : What ist the meaning of the tag E=95?
iWowik (2020-12-18 05:46:01+00:00): Oh, yeah!
It should be int_ref=E 95
Something was wrong with JOSM )
Frans S (2020-12-16 11:31:09+00:00): This mapping is also done with the Bing imagery as background. Please check every time you open a task that the correct imagery is loaded.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95917323
ndm (2020-12-16 21:21:10+00:00): Need to adjust imagery offset to consider existing map data.
ssnjan (2020-12-17 12:31:48+00:00): Hi Ndm, 
Thanks for looking into my edit, I have used bing aerial imagery but did not use the offset  feature to align the segment accurately I will take this learning for my future edits. Happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
ssnjan
datbrahm (2020-12-16 06:15:47+00:00): Hi,

The edit made in this changeset utilize the "Private Maxar Imagery" and "Driver Feedback" as source. Feel free to contact us in case there are any queries related to edit made in this changeset.

Thanks & Regards,
Brahm Datt
user_5359 (2020-12-17 04:22:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Frans S (2020-12-16 11:29:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings on this changeset  are fine and accurate. Just a few buildings not squared. You have a few meters offset on Maxar. Did you change anything?
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95918255
Supaplex (2020-12-17 05:38:24+00:00): PWN is ISO 639-3 language code for Paiwan language.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95918668
plotch (2020-12-17 06:21:53+00:00): Thanks for that.
parukhin (2021-01-26 13:19:20+00:00): Коллега, здравствуйте. Научитесь, пожалуйста, изменять смещение снимка по GPS трекам. Не нужно перетаскивать дороги и другие объекты при нулевом смещении снимка не проверив его.
Frans S (2020-12-16 09:24:34+00:00): Hello Biaca, A remark, 
You just mapped this changeset with the Bing imagery. Did you select it by yourself or came it together with iDedior.  Maxar imagery should be used here. This seems to be an error 
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95919025
Túllio (2021-02-04 02:59:34+00:00): Muito obrigado pelas edições e por sua contribuição. Creio que só não necessita escrever "Estrada Vicinal" no nome pois não seria esse o nome das estradas.
blackboxlogic (2021-01-01 22:00:10+00:00): When a sign ends with "PVT" or "Private" that is not part of the name.
ammrita (2021-01-04 05:55:22+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of road name and thank you for providing the information about it. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
ammrita
ndm (2020-12-16 21:04:42+00:00): You made building non-square
ssnjan (2020-12-17 11:30:53+00:00): Hi Ndm, 
I intended to add the service road to the building. As the building was misaligned I have aligned it according to Bing aerial Imagery but missed out on squaring the buildings. thanks for your feedback and corrections. I'll consider this learnings in my future edits. 
Regards,
ssnjan
Frans S (2020-12-16 09:17:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Hello .This is a buildings only project.
You mapped here groups of buildings as a residential area. The instructions ask to map buildings (individually). Please map just buildings here.
btw  Which task number is this ? 
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95920008
THAISTAVAREZ (2021-02-24 16:49:16+00:00): Este espaço é bem aproveitado para praticas esportivas. Como caminhada, ciclismo, futebol e trilhas.
Roanoke_Island (2021-02-24 22:48:09+00:00): Hi THAISTAVAREZ, That is good to know. The football fields look well mapped! Best Regards.

Oi THAISTAVAREZ, É bom saber. Os campos de futebol parecem bem mapeados! Cumprimentos.
Dimacn (2020-12-16 09:24:25+00:00): Пожалуйста используйте свежие снимки Esri. Вы используете очень старые спутниковые снимки Bing. Сменить снимки - справа панель "Фоновый рисунок" и переключатель доступных снимков. Вот этого вашего леса нет в реальности - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885413459  Во дворах используйте объекты natural=tree для обозначения отдельных деревьев.
alzyee (2021-12-19 23:15:48+00:00): Which changeset and why?
vsahith (2021-12-20 12:18:58+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the changeset. I have reverted a non-existent primary link road which was wrongly added in the changeset #93603242, the necessary changes have been made and the roads have been re-aligned in the changeset #95922439.
Let me know if there are any further concerns regarding the edits made.
Thanks once again, Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
vsahith
Dimacn (2020-12-16 09:17:19+00:00): Вы нарушаете правила оформления в OSM: полигоном типа лес обозначают деревья там где они растут, а не всё подряд во дворе. Пожалуйста удалите полигон леса. Во дворах используйте объекты natural=tree для обозначения отдельных деревьев.
redd (2021-08-07 15:28:53+00:00): Hallo Martin,
ist der Hydrant von aussen oder von innen zugänglich? Im Moment hängt er genau an der Hallen/Gebäudeecke.
grúße,
redd
MartinSchnös (2021-08-07 15:45:31+00:00): Hallo redd, der Hydrant ist von außen zugänglich und befindet sich mittig an der "kurzen Wand"
redd (2021-08-07 15:58:11+00:00): super, danke für die schnelle Antwort. Habe es verschoben und ergänzt, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109316461
rocky2109 (2020-12-16 07:26:03+00:00): Bing aerial imagery is used instead of Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)
mosstreet (2020-12-16 09:05:39+00:00): В слое махар, это грунтовая дорога, ведущая в том числе и к новым домикам на дачных участках.