piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pesec (2021-12-17 10:42:24+00:00): Не понятна географическая привязка данного фото.
pesec (2021-12-17 10:46:15+00:00): Вызывает сомнение, потому что объект подобного масштаба так быстро не снести. На спутнике от мая-июня этого года оно на месте.
Здание завода КСК 3-й год сносят.
Проверю на местности по возможности.
anpk (2021-12-17 11:02:26+00:00): Ну тогда могу ещё вот это видео со стройки скинуть на нём видно что эти здания уже снесены: https://youtu.be/i12glhlS-Z4?t=27
pesec (2021-12-17 11:28:48+00:00): Принято, спасибо
wireguy (2021-12-17 11:37:25+00:00): turning wood into water. you missed the fountain.
JriSv250 (2021-12-22 21:07:29+00:00): I improved the water polygon and added the fountain.
opendcc (2021-12-21 21:49:04+00:00): Hello,

what do you mean with waterbody? See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance for possible values

best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-16 07:05:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9345267826/history

Is it Starbucks operating under the popular Starbucks brand or some other distinct one?

I am asking as it was added with self-contradictory

brand:wikidata=Q37158
not:brand:wikidata=Q37158

and I want to fix it, and I am not sure is "not:brand:wikidata=Q37158" intentional here
impiaaa (2021-12-17 16:17:54+00:00): Please use a more descriptive changeset message: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments This one could say something like, "Deleted a redundant traffic light". However I notice that the traffic light you did map is incorrectly placed. Please read the article on traffic signals to learn how they should be placed.
ravali_78 (2021-12-20 05:19:50+00:00): HI pratama_j,
I have fixed the classification gap and removed invalid turn restriction.Kindly check with relation 7923504,way 221222918,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115147321.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115033608
mueschel (2021-12-19 10:22:38+00:00): Hi,
you added many ways with a "NPHidden" tag - could you check and fix this?
cafferrie (2021-12-20 21:39:31+00:00): Talking to staff at WOP, they want some trails tagged as nordic they occasionally groom for events which don't appear on their map. Looking now, a better tag would be piste:hidden=yes
mueschel (2021-12-20 21:58:48+00:00): Data like this should not be in OSM but needs to be in a separate database. There are hundreds of applications and thousands of maps, we can't have tags for all of in the main database.
telliks (2022-08-05 18:49:39+00:00): w1012954254
w1012954255
both of these ways are marked as power lines, almost certain that these don't exist (they go through buildings and don't look right). I just wanted to make sure before I deleted them.
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-17 17:28:37+00:00): Hi, it would be helpful if you could put more meaningful comments in your changesets.

See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SafetyIng (2021-12-25 10:28:07+00:00): Hey, 
wenn du Straßenbegleitende Parkplätze einzeichnest, gibt es für diese auch das Tag parking=street_side , dann erkennt man, dass es Parktaschen sind ;)
nevw (2021-12-18 02:34:52+00:00): Hi
you appear to have changed South Road unnecessarily based on an out of date cached view of the map.
@awamartin corrected South Road to add footway=sidewalk as he had previously incorrectly added foot=yes.
You appear to have changed it back to the incorrect tagging.
I think it is best if I revert your changeset so it goes back to the correct tagging.
The Tor browser is often a good one to use to check for the latest standard layer of the osm.org map version as the secure networks are unlikely to have as much cache as common browsers.
nevw (2021-12-18 03:18:00+00:00): There seem to be these two similar methods to tag footways that are next to the road:
footway=sidewalk
and sidewalk=*

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk

I think the better method would be the sidewalk=left|right|both method.

The wiki says 
"Use footway=sidewalk along with highway=footway to tag sidewalks" so this would usually be used when seperate footway are mapped I think, but wiki also says "footway=sidewalk is also sometimes used with other highway=* values" so is a bit confusing 

...and they can also be mapped separately as footways.
nevw (2021-12-18 14:35:30+00:00): More complete reference   
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
footway=sidewalk used on the trunk road South Road seems incorrect as it to be used on separately mapped footways or paths.

sidewalk=left|right|both is the correct method if tags are added to the trunk road and the footways are not yet mapped separately.
somix (2021-12-29 11:49:26+00:00): здравствуйте, буквы в адресах пишутся с большой буквы
wireguy (2021-12-17 11:27:02+00:00): Thanks for redoing the building outline.   It still didn't have squared corners, so I corrected it.   Try using the 'Q' key.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
A67-A67 (2021-12-17 09:16:58+00:00): Hallo,

De Schieveense Polder is groter dan alleen de weilanden in deze hoek. Er is ook al een relatie voor: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12490929

Het lijkt mij ook niet nodig om alle weilanden samen te voegen tot één multipolygoon. Multipolygonen zijn bedoeld voor vlakken met gaten en dat is hier niet het geval.
A67-A67 (2021-12-17 09:23:19+00:00): Daarnaast liggen de poldersloten, boerderijen en wegen ook in de polder. De polder is dus groter dan alleen de weilanden.
JJJWegdam (2021-12-17 10:12:07+00:00): Fine.. Ik zal de naam weghalen.. Ik hoop dat carto die relatie dan ooit eindelijk een keer gaat renderen
JJJWegdam (2021-12-17 10:14:25+00:00): Ik snap alleen niet hoe je hier wél meteen ontevreden over bent, terwijl de Oude Campspolder al heel lang als farmland met name getagt is en de Duifpolder als island. Waarom zou je hier zo strict willen zijn?
A67-A67 (2021-12-17 11:03:28+00:00): Bedankt! Het kost veel moeite om dit soort tagging voor de renderer op te lossen. De Oude Campspolder zal dus ook opgelost moeten worden.

Over het taggen als eiland is een lange discussie en daar ben ik het zeker niet mee eens: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2814850 

Er is overigens een voorstel voor een tag man_made=polder: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/man_made%3Dpolder
JJJWegdam (2021-12-17 11:54:19+00:00): Ik hoop dat de mensen die die tags voorstellen / tagging voor de renderer oplossen ook moeite willen steken in het maken en gemerged krijgen van een Pull Request bij Carto
impiaaa (2021-12-17 16:15:16+00:00): Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. This change adds duplicate information: highway=traffic_signals is already tagged at the stop positions, which is accepted practice: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=traffic%20signals?uselang=en#Tag_all_incoming_ways In OpenStreetMap, we are careful to not tag things twice: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
vulasala (2021-12-18 05:18:46+00:00): Hi alvinxena,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 1012996204, as there is no clear path.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115042656
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-19 13:19:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122579361 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some changes that appear to be mostly vandalism in Iraq.
vulasala (2021-12-18 05:07:22+00:00): Hi JaymeeLopezFrayna,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 501932403 from primary to unclassified, as it is creating classification gap.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115042898
fghj753 (2021-12-17 09:18:26+00:00): Please consider keeping consecutive changes to same area in same changeset. Looks like changesets 115042339, 115042818 and 115042942 could all have been in single changeset.
Bolt032 (2021-12-17 09:39:21+00:00): Hi! You're right. Thank you!
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 20:07:27+00:00): Hallo Martin,
 
erst einmal Danke an dich für deine vielen Beiträge zu OSM.
 
Bitte möglichst nichts an Grenzen kleben (u.a.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9345798237/history -> habe ich gerade korrigiert).
 
Ich werde heute noch ein paar Dinge von dir kommentieren.
 
Gruß Peter
H4N5-antw (2021-12-17 13:00:15+00:00): Dank voor uw opvolging, lijkt het, of bezorg ik soms meer werk om recht te zetten dan plaatste ik louter note?
ivanbranco (2021-12-23 22:51:27+00:00): Hi ImFarrukh,

https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22place%22%3D%22Yes%22+global&R

can you fix this?
user_5359 (2022-01-20 18:10:31+00:00): Hello! The tag place=yes isn't define. I have the suspicion that data from property boundaries was imported here.
ImFarrukh (2022-01-20 18:16:30+00:00): This was a just proposal for the developers now I have clear the boundaries.
NetWormKido (2022-01-18 09:41:38+00:00): Прекращайте добавлять несуществующие дороги!
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 20:54:35+00:00): Bitte "board_type=board" ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9345825875/history ) gar nicht mehr benutzen
und hier ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:board_type ) entsprechend etwas anderes aussuchen das passt
(, wenn nicht dann "board_type=*" entfernen).
Danke
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 20:56:38+00:00): Bitte "board_type=board" gar nicht mehr benutzen
und hier ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:board_type ) entsprechend etwas anderes aussuchen das passt
(, wenn nicht dann "board_type=*" entfernen).
Danke
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 21:00:05+00:00): Bitte "board_type=map" gar nicht mehr benutzen
und hier ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:board_type ) entsprechend etwas anderes aussuchen das passt
(, wenn nicht dann "board_type=*" entfernen).
 
Wenn aber eine Karte gemeint ist dann: "information=board" -> "information=map" .
 
Danke
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 21:01:03+00:00): Bitte "board_type=map" gar nicht mehr benutzen
und hier ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:board_type ) entsprechend etwas anderes aussuchen das passt
(, wenn nicht dann "board_type=*" entfernen).
 
Wenn aber eine Karte gemeint ist dann: "information=board" -> "information=map" .
 
Danke
Protoxenus (2022-12-06 11:34:53+00:00): Bitte ein bisschen mehr Sorgfalt beim Editieren und nicht gleich das Ganze Gebäude unsichtbar machen.
Danke
rskedgell (2021-12-18 07:23:28+00:00): Hi, you asked for a review of your edit. It looks fine to me, thanks for updating the map.

The gate only really needs the access=private tag, as it covers all transport modes, but there's no need to change it. The iD editor has an unfortunate way of prompting for access values which aren't really necessary or appropriate unless there's an exception to the default for that type of highway or the access=* tag used.
w5m (2021-12-18 16:58:09+00:00): Thanks for taking a look. I did wonder whether I needed to populate all of those access values - noted for future edits.
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 20:15:32+00:00): "historic=ruins" passt nicht zu "place=*"
( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/446688539/history -> habe ich gerade korrigiert. Du kannst stattdessen den Umriss der Ruine einzeichnen, wenn man die denn noch erkennen kann.)
vulasala (2021-12-18 01:44:58+00:00): Hi alvinxena,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the geometry of the way 1013011639 as per the ground truth.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115045834
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 21:04:12+00:00): "information=board" -> "information=map" ?
Гульдала (2021-12-23 13:53:28+00:00): Е неге менын аккаунтыма кирип журсын??
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 21:02:12+00:00): Bitte "board_type=map" gar nicht mehr benutzen
und hier ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:board_type ) entsprechend etwas anderes aussuchen das passt
(, wenn nicht dann "board_type=*" entfernen).
 
Wenn aber eine Karte gemeint ist dann: "information=board" -> "information=map" .
 
Danke
Frans S (2021-12-21 15:00:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115046356
ivanbranco (2021-12-19 08:35:47+00:00): Hi 489df4he,

I don't think building age=40y it's a good idea. Someone should update it next year with building age=41y and so on...

I think it would be better to use the standard start_date=1981 tag
489df4he (2021-12-20 16:02:46+00:00): Hi ivanbranco,
Thank you for the advice. I have updated it.
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 21:07:19+00:00): Bitte "board_type=map" gar nicht mehr benutzen
und hier ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:board_type ) entsprechend etwas anderes aussuchen das passt
(, wenn nicht dann "board_type=*" entfernen).
 
Wenn aber eine Karte gemeint ist dann: "information=board" -> "information=map" .
 
Danke
Frans S (2021-12-19 13:41:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.

Please tag buildings just as building=yes.
No name tages please.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115046687
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 21:17:47+00:00): "name=o.T." steht für "ohne Titel" / ohne Name ?
Wenn ja, dann
"name=o.T." -> "noname=yes"
 
Da waren (glaube ich) noch 1-2 solche POI die das genauso betrifft (du weißt ja was du heute gemappt hast). Ich habe die Tabs aber leider bereits geschlossen und finde sie auf die Schnelle nicht mehr.
 
Dort bitte auch entsprechend korrigieren. Danke
 
PS:
Bitte beachte das ich dir heute so viele Änderungssatz-Kommentare geschrieben habe, ist ganz und gar nicht böse gemeint - sieh diese einfach als konstruktive Kritik.
Msiipola (2022-01-11 13:20:16+00:00): Det verkar som din Bing-bilder inte är positionskalibrerade. 
Exempelvis vägen norr om 56/70 som går från Sör Kvista västerut upp mot 10 meter fel, förskjuten norrut.
Bilder från Bing måste kalibreras då de alltid har ett positionsfel.
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 21:10:46+00:00): "name=o.T." steht für "ohne Titel" / ohne Name ?
Wenn ja, dann
"name=o.T." -> "noname=yes"
Map-Peter (2021-12-17 21:02:53+00:00): Bitte "board_type=map" gar nicht mehr benutzen
und hier ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:board_type ) entsprechend etwas anderes aussuchen das passt
(, wenn nicht dann "board_type=*" entfernen).
 
Wenn aber eine Karte gemeint ist dann: "information=board" -> "information=map" .
 
Danke
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-17 08:57:53+00:00): can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3646368 ?
Frans S (2021-12-21 13:55:10+00:00): Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
The points in my previous comments are valid here as well.
You also connected lots of buildings together with their nodes. We cannot see from the imagery if they share walls, so exept when it is obvious they share walls, like terraced buildings we should concider each buildings as a detached house. ( in JOSM press the ctr key down while drawing the building to avoid connecting nodes.) 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115049118
user_5359 (2021-12-19 10:40:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9340958582/history : I assume there is a copy& paste error.
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-02 01:05:40+00:00): Which kind of Copy & Paste issue do you mean?
biobuur (2022-01-08 17:57:32+00:00): Hoi defikarte_app
ohne die Gegend genau zu kennen: ich bezweifle, dass dieser AED da gelandet ist, wo er hingehört
JhowieNitnek (2021-12-19 20:30:07+00:00): Why did you chance it into amenity=refugee_site? It isn't a refugee site but a government registration office. Could you please reverse your chance
grimpeur78 (2021-12-19 20:50:34+00:00): I already did. It was an error.
Frans S (2021-12-19 13:52:39+00:00): See my comment on another changeset.
Reverted your mappings
Frans S (2021-12-21 13:52:59+00:00): Hello. More Changesets shows the same issues.
Please refresh your mapping skills
a remark. Never connect a node of a building to a highway or other feature.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115051335
Frans S (2021-12-21 13:29:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115051477
TrickyFoxy (2022-02-22 19:10:29+00:00): 👋 Кажется вы ошиблись классом дороги. Либо хотели продлить seconary до дороги с классом выше. На всякий оставлю справку по типам дорог. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
mavl (2021-12-18 10:05:41+00:00): Здравствуйте и спасибо за уточнение карты. Этот пакет правок добавляет дороги на территории промышленного объекта со статусом highway=track. В OpenSreetMap - это лесные или полевые дороги. Для данного случая больше подходят дороги со статусом highway=service.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
user_5359 (2021-12-19 10:30:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the new version of http://www.osm.org/way/1013045747/history. You have a typo for the key highay.
geow (2021-12-17 19:34:38+00:00): Servus Manuel, du hast hier aus Versehen den zutreffenden Namen entfernt (vorort beschildert) und aus einer Art Schnellimbiss einen Kiosk gemacht. Hab's korrigiert, tutto bene :-)

geow
Mannivu (2021-12-17 12:30:33+00:00): Se nella cascina abita una o due famiglie, indicarla come place sarebbe incorretto; anzi, meglio usare landuse=farmyard+name=Cascina... e indicare i vari edifici con building=farm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115053052
fedc (2021-12-17 12:39:54+00:00): Beh, non proprio: il fatto di essere un place non dipende dal numero di abitanti, tant´è vero che abbiamo anche le case sparse e le località disabitate segnate come place.
Mannivu (2021-12-17 12:44:27+00:00): Ma come place=isolated_dwelling. La wiki, inoltre, consiglia di usare landuse=farmyard per una migliore mappatura delle cascine/fattorie.
fedc (2021-12-17 13:02:01+00:00): place=isolated_dwelling per le case isolate, place=locality per le località non abitate, e una pletora di altre possibilità per località di diverso tipo, fra cui ovviamente anche place=farm per le cascine.
Mannivu (2021-12-17 17:02:09+00:00): Hai ragione, ho sempre pensato che bastasse farmyard, ma anche sul gruppo Telegram mi hanno detto che è bene mettere anche place=farm. Scusa per il disturbo!
fedc (2021-12-18 18:06:18+00:00): Nessun disturbo, buon proseguimento.
Gopnik McBlyat (2022-01-07 10:30:59+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments
bxl-forever (2021-12-17 13:37:52+00:00): Hello,

Once you set highway=footway, it grants access to pedestrians and disallows cyclists.  Nothing more to do.

Adding foot=yes and bicycle=no is not necessary.  (On the contrary, it clutters the database.)
Der Bierpuncheur (2021-12-19 18:56:53+00:00): Okay, I’ll keep this in mind for future edits.
rab (2021-12-18 10:21:28+00:00): Bitte keine Flächen mit Straßen vernähen
Herwescheluc (2021-12-18 13:42:31+00:00): Hallo rab!
1. Reaktion auf meine Arbeit - danke erstmal! Wenn nicht gewünscht, werde ich das zukünftig vermeiden - da scheiden sich aber wohl die Geister etwas, ich fand diverse genau so erfolgte Einträge und hab einfach weitergenäht. Aber gut, dann ist dem so: Ich trenn' auch wieder auf...
Hilfreich wären Angaben, wo genau das stört, falls Dir wieder was begegnet, bitte melden!.
Gruß
Andreas
rab (2021-12-18 14:41:38+00:00): Hallo Andreas, 
das ist an sich ein altes Thema -
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64158

Ich habe gerade schon mal ein paar Sachen aufgetrennt. 

Hier mal ein paar Beispiele die ich problematisch finde:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13540376#map=18/50.67778/8.28781
Das muss kein Multipolygon sein, Es ist mit mehreren Straßen vernäht. Wenn sich an den Straßen Änderungen ergeben hat man einen erheblichen Mehraufwand, Falls die Fläche versehendlich verschoben wird, beeinträchtigt das auch die verbundenen Straßen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267407920
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27335141

Zaun und Weg deckungsgleich geht eigentlich nicht.

Namen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1013005635
-Heist das Gebäude Fachwerkhaus?

cycleway:both=no warst du nicht.

access=yes statt vorher access=destination. Hier würde ich den access tag eher löschen.

Gruß
Ralf
Владимир К (2021-12-19 14:26:35+00:00): Hi!
I don't think the relatioan 10991920 is valid.
This is not full duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/221993
tags also seem strange
name=waterway E50-01 ? this river is not called so at all
Владимир К (2021-12-19 14:27:50+00:00): And I'll delete it