piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Johnbo (2022-02-01 10:12:11+00:00): Hola Seraq.

¿En qué consisten los cambios que has hecho en estas ediciones? El comentario "Cambios según PNOA" no indica nada acerca del objetivo de tu edición, pero parece que has cambiado todo el bosque del Parque Natural por huerta frutal, dejando además una relación con polígonos abiertos, lo que hace que ya no se represente como zona verde.

Cuando haces un cambio tan grande y que afecta a un área de tanto calado, convendría que al menos expliques en qué consisten tus cambios o incluso que busques consenso con otros editores, ya que podrían considerar tu edición como vandalismo cuando a lo mejor sólo contiene un error.

Saludos.
edvac (2022-02-01 23:01:55+00:00): Dear Seraq:

Several users of the OSM España Telegram group have warned us at the DWG about many edits that you have done in the area of the Parque Natural de la Sierra de Cazorla, Segura y Las Villas, covering areas of Jaén and Granada provinces.

I've checked some of your edits, and I can see they are quite massive.

In some cases, you have deleted polygons and other objects with apparently no reason. There are also issues about changes in objects tagging and wrong objects created by you after those deletions. Some not exhaustive examples:

1. This named residential area and hamlet, deleted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662912359/history
2. This relation was a landuse=forest since 2011 until 2016, when it was changed to natural=wood: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1359435/history
But on 29th Dec 2021 you started editing it, deleting some members (so breaking the relation), and after 6 edits you retagged it as orchard in your 7th last modification of the relation.
3. In the area were there was the aforementioned wood, you added (among probably other objects) a much smaller forest relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13657347
The outer member is tagged as landuse=forest, but outer members of type=multipolygon relations shouldn't be tagged (except optional source, fixme, note or similar tags).

We urge you to explain why you have made these massive edits in the area.

But more important, we see that since more than a year ago (since sept. 2020 to be exact), you haven't replied any comment from any user that commented in your changesets. You have exactly 14 comments in 13 changesets by 10 different users, all of them unanswered: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3148901

Please gives us some feedback here, so we can check together why you have done these edits and how we can correct them, or revert them.

Best regards,

Rafael Avila Coya, on behalf of the OSM Foundation, Data Working Group.
Seraq (2022-02-02 07:07:10+00:00): Hello edvac,
First of all I want to apologise for the mistakes made in the Sierra de Cazorla, Segura y Las Villas Natural Park. I had a problem with a multipolygon and I tried to solve it, but I have not been able to solve it. What I have done is to create a problem that I have not been able to solve.

I answer in parts

1. This named residential area and hamlet, deleted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662912359/

I changed landuse=residential to place=hamlet because I thought the label hamlet was more accurate for this settlement.

2. This relation was a landuse=forest since 2011 until 2016, when it was changed to natural=wood: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1359435/history
But on 29th Dec 2021 you started editing it, deleting some members (so breaking the relation), and after 6 edits you retagged it as orchard in your 7th last modification of the relation.

Here I made a mistake and I didn't know how to solve it.

3. In the area were there was the aforementioned wood, you added (among probably other objects) a much smaller forest relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13657347
The outer member is tagged as landuse=forest, but outer members of type=multipolygon relations shouldn't be tagged (except optional source, fixme, note or similar tags).

Here I made a mistake and I didn't know how to solve it.

4.But more important, we see that since more than a year ago (since Sept. 2020 to be exact), you haven't replied any comment from any user that commented in your changesets. You have exactly 14 comments in 13 changesets by 10 different users, all of them unanswered: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3148901

I have always replied to everyone who has asked me questions about my changesets.
 The last person I replied to was Johnbo. Yesterday I sent him an email apologising for the big mistake I made with the multipolygons.
I have always replied by sending emails to Ivanbranco, JuanjoMC, sandalman, unodecrespos and so on... you can ask them. We may or may not agree with the editions but the conversations have always been constructive...

I remain at your disposal to clarify the editions that I make.

I apologise again for the damage I have caused, I am not able to fix it.

Seraq
Koreller (2023-05-27 10:15:50+00:00): Hi ff5722, you tag a man_made=reservoir_covered, as a school (on this : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020010070), it's a mistake, if you have a doubt have a look at my contribution guide on North Korea (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/North_Korea_Mapping_Guide on section "School" and "Covered water tank"), have a good day !
ff5722 (2023-05-28 13:01:03+00:00): Yes, this must have been a mistake, I saw you already corrected it, thanks.
user_5359 (2022-01-11 16:21:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/707760193. What is the meaning of the tag heigh = silo (see also height = 11)
HABmaps (2025-05-13 13:08:26+00:00): It was just a typing error, fixed
osmviborg (2022-01-12 14:02:32+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=471044223990603
parsd51 (2022-01-12 14:20:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117878290
osmviborg (2022-01-12 15:12:29+00:00): Du finder vejnavnet i matrikelregistret, Povlsker - 121dr, Sommerodden.
parsd51 (2022-01-12 16:50:35+00:00): Tak for dit input.

Hvis jeg kigger på de to matrikler 121x og 121akx ved siden af har de begge adresse Dyndebyvejen. Så jeg forstår ikke hvordan det kan konkludere noget om vejnavnet ved hovedvejen. Vil du forklare mig det?
eggie (2022-01-10 15:43:26+00:00): Prima zo! Het nige wat ik had gedaan bij het linker vak was het gras er netjes om heen gelegd.Bij landuse=grass zie je dat niet direct, maar bij bos zie je anders bomen op het parkeervak. 
gr eggie
user_14819675 (2022-01-10 15:58:27+00:00): Dat heb ik inmiddels aangepast. Bedankt.
gpserror (2026-07-12 15:12:51+00:00): Hi, sorry about the really long delay in comment and changeset age, but in regards to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19734958 - an inquiry at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5391269 seems that this road should be deerwood hill and not hollow.  I saw a photograph on mapillary that it's also hill (also that it was a private road)... what was the source of deerwood hollow?
Jojojones (2026-07-12 20:44:51+00:00): Yes it is a private road and owned/maintained by the property owners but it was never "Hollow" always "Hill" as per all deeds/town, google...please correct it back.
Jojojones (2026-07-12 20:56:44+00:00): thanks for fixing it.
A Hall (2026-07-13 17:49:47+00:00): No objections to the name change from me! For historical context there was some merging of State of VT resources and the iD editor for OSM. Data that came over as Deerwood HL (or any abbreviation of HL) was labeled 'hollow' whereas the overwhelming majority of these instances it should be 'hill'. 

If you see other instances of this that you know are wrong, I think it's safe to go ahead and make those edits. No discussion needed
marczoutendijk (2023-01-26 09:40:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9407678178
¿Por qué ha utilizado aquí la etiqueta sym=Dot?
eggie (2022-01-10 15:46:52+00:00): Lijkt me oke zo.
Of de technologie-tagging nog klopt is maar de vraag. Het was oorspronkelijk een bulkimport uit 2009.  
Gr eggie
jonrellim (2022-01-10 18:36:07+00:00): Hi,
If you have it, can you also add address information to the POI, or preferably merge the existing address node with this POI? It would help keep the address information in the right place. 

regards,
jonrellim
KostyaZAyAc (2022-01-12 14:49:05+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the advice that helps to improve our edits on the OSM, you can see the changes in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116069864
Thanks for your feedback.
eggie (2022-01-10 15:48:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Lee Carré (2022-01-10 14:56:39+00:00): http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:source = ?
Lee Carré (2022-01-10 19:53:03+00:00): See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115991882
eggie (2022-01-12 10:15:02+00:00): Merged info with addressnode.
eggie
NastiaP1 (2022-01-12 14:46:42+00:00): Hello, Eggie!
Thank you for your feedback and correction. 
Best regards,
Nastia
francians (2022-04-23 13:56:22+00:00): Ciao MBG1965,

rivedendo il changeset mi pare che "Lou Saret" sia un nome locale (occitano?) del "monte Gullione", possibile?
Ti rimando a questa fonte:
https://maps.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ams/italy_50k/txu-pclmaps-oclc-6540719-dronero-79-ii.jpg
nota che essendo del '41 la mappa si può usare come fonte per la toponomastica (purché ancora valida) 

Grazie mille e buon mapping
Francesco
francians (2022-04-23 13:59:25+00:00): PS. il nome italiano in name, il nome locale va bene in loc_name (oppure name:oc se occitano)
Bence Mélykúti (2022-01-29 14:26:27+00:00): Szia!
Azt szeretném kérdezni, hogy az Oroszlános udvar eltávolítása a címből nem egy automatika fals pozitívja volt-e. Végül is a saját honlapjukról írtam ki, így adták meg a címüket.
Üdv!
vasony (2022-01-29 17:03:48+00:00): Szia!

Nem false positve.

Ha van addr:street, akkor nincs addr:place. Mindkettő a házszámhoz tartozó közterületet reprezentálja, egyszerre nem lehetnek, mert akkor nem állapítható meg mihez tartozik a házszám.

Egyébként Budapesten nincs addr:place, ezt kb. a tanyákra találták ki ahol a tanya mint utca nem rajzolható fel, illetve külföldön vannak városszintű házszámok. 

Oroszlános udvart itt felesleges megadni, nem része a címnek. Ha szerepeltetni akarod, akkor a description mezőbe lehet ezeket a magyarázó dolgokat tenni, pl. "bejárat az Oroszlános udvarból" stb..

Tamás
Bence Mélykúti (2022-01-29 17:38:29+00:00): Értem. Köszönöm a válaszodat!
skyper (2022-01-12 12:42:34+00:00): Hallo windkraft-os

Welche Quellen hast Du benutzt? Bing?

Wenn die Anlage noch nicht in Betrieb ist, ist `power=generator` und auch alle Zusatztag wohl falsch und Du solltest ein `construction:` als Präfix der Schlüssel verwenden. `start_date=*` wäre auch nicht schlecht.

Bitte diskutiere mit uns im Forum und mach nicht einfach so weiter.

Danke skyper
windkraft-os (2022-01-12 16:35:07+00:00): Ich bitte sie. Zunächst ist die Anlage im Marktstammdatenregister eingetragen. Zudem sind Quellen auch zuletzt vor Ort gewesen, die den Bau auch dokumentiert haben.
Zudem ist auch ein IB-Datum für die Anlage kein sinnvoller Tag, da es nur Prognosewerte sind,.
Ich werde nicht dem Dialogforum mich anschließen, weil sie einfach nur noch nerven
skyper (2022-01-13 15:48:37+00:00): Dann verstehe ich `description=foundation under construction` nicht.

Warum werden die Quellen nicht angegeben? Sollte doch kein Problem sein, wenn sie legal sind. Ansonsten sollten die Änderungen eh unterlassen werden.

Im Forum gibt es ja schon eine Diskussion zu den Marktstammdaten, da können wir gerne weiterdiskutieren.
windkraft-os (2022-01-20 21:17:38+00:00): Foundation under construction bedeutet, dass das Fundament gelegt wird, was in Hämelhausen derzeit der Fall ist. Wenn Turm und gegebenfalls Endaufbau ist, dann steht "under construction". Erst mit der IB muss dieser Tag gelöscht werden
skyper (2022-01-24 13:58:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/node/9407717065/1
macht so keinen Sinn. Entweder Generator mit Leistung oder Fundament im Bau. Beides geht nicht. Auch hier sind wohl Präfix wie `proposed:*` oder `connstruction:*` angebracht. Die Baustelle kann ja auch mit `landuse=construction` als kleine Fläche eingetragen werden.
voschix (2022-11-28 11:17:10+00:00): What is the ource of the name change  of the road Via Ognissanti (way 334655693) ?
SekeRob (2022-11-28 11:34:49+00:00): That's funny, my change versions area V6+V7 and before at V4-V5  you made changes to that way with that name, so I think you're asking the wrong person.

That said since it's 'Ponte' and the name extends across the bridge, it might very well be around there and sure enough, west-end of the bridge is the sign, pointing west. Propose you add the tag source:name=sign and description:it= segna da ponte or similar.

ciao
SekeRob (2022-11-28 11:37:22+00:00): Oh, and indeed I see now I was the name change maker :o)))
voschix (2022-11-28 11:53:31+00:00): OK. Corrected from road signs and direct local knowledge.
SekeRob (2022-11-28 11:54:14+00:00): Errata: Something to know: If there's a conflict of naming for instance with a Toponomastica, the wiki is clear: Name signs on road supersede, and apparently this was recently reconfirmed over at Italian Telegram where someone went about changing long street names to the short Via Cavour, where they were before the full name of the count.

cheers
voschix (2022-11-28 12:02:00+00:00): I checked the name against signs and the official geo-database of house numbers and names. It should be OK now.  The bridge itself is called just  "Ponte Ognissanti", The road on the eastern side is "Via Fistomba". The road on the western side is "Via Ponte Ognissanti" up to the roundabout. Further west it is called "Via Ognissanti"
juminet (2022-01-11 20:10:29+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM!

Si vous désirez ajouter votre activité sur OSM, vous pouvez ếtre plus précis en utilisant le tag craft=* ou bien office=*. De même, vous pouvez ajouter un site web, un numéro de téléphone, une page facebook, etc.

N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions!

Bonne continuation,

juminet
eggie (2022-01-10 15:51:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Kleine aanpassing verricht.. De info samengevoegd met de oorspronkelijke adresnode. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
LordGarySugar (2022-01-11 20:53:47+00:00): Why have you deleted the golf club car park and added golf=rough and duplicate footways inside it?
LordGarySugar (2022-01-11 20:56:45+00:00): And added a golf cartpath on top of an existing service road leading to a substation?
adrianojbr (2022-01-17 18:31:15+00:00): Qual critério foi usado para fazer a alteração da velocidade máxima de 60 para 80?

Passei hoje de manhã e a velocidade máxima continua 60.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115985949
Chalcroft (2022-07-03 20:42:12+00:00): Hallo Radeung, löchtest du vor etwa einem Jahr die Gleise im ehem. Bahnhof Oker Ost? Falls Ja: Auch, wenn das Gelände jetzt als Deponie verfüllt ist, hat das Mapping der abgerissenen Gleise dennoch einen Grund. In Kartendiensten wie OpenRailwayMaps werden auch ausdrücklich aus historischen Gründen bereits abgerissene Bahnanlagen gemappt, so dass diese Informationen fehlen würden. In unmittelbarer Umgebung zum IVH-Gelände zählen dazu auch die Gleise der ehem. Anschlussbahn zum heutigen Grillo-Werk.
Uyo Pamondolang (2022-01-10 15:26:52+00:00): Jl. Siswa
Tomas Straupis (2022-01-11 07:10:17+00:00): Ne, tikrai ne. Jokių kabučių nereikia, tuo labiau angliškame variante.
Max-Kritic (2022-01-21 17:29:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Les caméras sont en doublon sur St Omer.
MxxCon (2022-01-10 20:15:40+00:00): Hello.
Looking at satellite imagery of this buildings, it seems like roofs here are flat.
Is that not correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115986622
MxxCon (2022-01-10 20:18:00+00:00): Hello again.
You tagged this road segment as not having bike lanes at all.
However, satellite imagery shows that there are shared bike lines in both directions. Is that not correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115986630
fuchspl (2022-01-10 20:28:59+00:00): Z powodu braku w terenie oznakowania pionowego i poziomego dróg rowerowych zmieniłem je na highway=construction, construction=cycleway. Przejazdy rowerowe są już oznaczone, więc je zostawiłem.

Podczas wizyty na miejscu nie znalazłem śladu po kapliczce https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5975924646 więc póki co zmieniłem tag na removed:historic=wayside_shrine.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115996963
NieWnen (2022-01-10 20:56:27+00:00): Jak ścieżki są przejezdne i nie kładą nawierzchni, ale nadal brak oznakowania, to już lepiej ustawić tymczasowo highway=path
wtedy nawigacje mogą poprowadzić po takiej ścieżce jeśli jest taka potrzeba.

Ew. jak trwają jeszcze jakieś drobne prace, ale nadal jest przejezdne to normalne tagowanie ścieżek + construction=minor, też wydaje się być ok.

Warto dodać też wtedy "note=<opis dlaczego tak, a nie inaczej>"
eggie (2022-01-11 10:06:19+00:00): Dag Fietsgw.. Je vraagt feedback
Lastig te beoordelen. Wellicht  heb je wat aan deze recente achtergrond?
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=brtachtergrondkaart&res=0.5&datemin=11-01-2021&loc=51.38098%2C5.413637%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2021-09-08&acqid=20210908_112358_SV1-02&sensor=SuperView-1

MVG
eggie
Fietsgw1 (2022-01-11 11:19:27+00:00): Bedankt Eggie. De reden voor verplaatsing van dat punt was dat de Broekhovenseweg tot aan afslag Zeven Fonteinen was aangeduid als Tertiare weg met voor fietsers de aanduiding "use sidepath". Na de aansluiting van het fietspad op de weg tot Zeven Fonteinen ligt echter geen "sidepath". Als ik in OFM een route maakte vanuit het zuidoosten (Kapelstraat) naar het einde van de Broekhovenseweg, werd de route over Wilgerijs geleid. Ik dacht dat verplaatsen van het punt misschien de oplossing zou zijn.

MVG Fietsgw1
eggie (2022-01-11 11:34:09+00:00): Oke, maar dan moet er nog iets anders aan de hand zijn, want dit is wat je hebt gedaan. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115987291
Het stukje tot aan de kruising Zeven Fontijnen stond gewoon open? Je hebt volgens mij alleen de node opgeschoven maar verder toch niets losgemaakt of tagging aangepast?
Ik check even met de OFM. Kom er op terug.
eggie
eggie (2022-01-11 11:38:11+00:00): Nou .. dat was inderdaad het 'foutje' 
Je hebt het perfect opgelost.
Het routeert na komende zaterdag weer met de update van de OFM.
Gr eggie
Map-Noob (2022-01-12 15:55:41+00:00): Ich habe die gelöscht weil ich fälschlicherweise dachte, dass die Hausnummer nur da sein sollten wenn dort auch Häuser sind.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-29 19:53:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8074961599#map=19/51.93793/15.55043 - to dalej istnieje?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3287935
clambake92115 (2022-01-20 02:17:45+00:00): "A highway=pedestrian is a road or an area mainly or exclusively for pedestrians in which some vehicle traffic may be authorized"
This should be kept as highway:steps. Also, they are not named in the real world and as such the name tag should be removed.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 16:07:06+00:00): I used a larger area to correct 34 typing errors where surface=unp was used instead of surface=unpaved.
user_5359 (2022-01-11 10:41:03+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://overpass-turbo.eu/?Q=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%3B(node%5B%2280%22%5D%3Bway%5B%2280%22%5D%3B%3E%3Brel%5B%2280%22%5D%3B)%3Bout%20meta%3B&C=48.0089;13.71578;17
What is the meaning of 80=100?
eggie (2022-01-10 17:10:46+00:00): Dag Hulbosch..
Tip Probeer je paden los te houden van de landuse.
De linker alttoets gebruiken bij intekenen. Dan plakt de boel niet vast. Ik maak even wat los.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-01-10 17:14:24+00:00): Trap toegevoegd highway=steps
eggie (2022-01-10 17:08:29+00:00): Dag BoardSurfer.. Lijkt me helemaal correct.
Mapse
eggie
DUGA (2022-01-11 18:27:02+00:00): Please do not submit a changeset across the globe.
u2spy (2022-01-10 16:46:49+00:00): Fraud clicking
Note Control (2022-01-10 17:04:23+00:00): ???
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-01-19 14:49:13+00:00): There is no such place or municipality named "City of Halifax "  or just Halifax its called "Halifax Regional Municipality "
Nate Wessel (2022-01-19 14:57:48+00:00): There's no place called "Halifax"?
Wikipedia and Wikidata disagree. I'm sure it has a longer official name, but do people actually not just call it "Halifax"?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-01-20 01:50:09+00:00): I live there its still "Halifax Regional Municipality "
Nate Wessel (2022-01-20 02:10:57+00:00): Apologies for stepping on any toes. My impression was that the regional municipality was going as "Halifax" and that the previous city boundary was now defunct as an administrative boundary, but kept around perhaps as a statistical unit, similar to Old Toronto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2989349 

Halifax.ca seems to indicate that this is the case, as does the English Wikipedia page for "Halifax, Nova Scotia": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halifax,_Nova_Scotia

A search for "Halifax" in Nominatim currently returns the historical city boundary, not the current amalgamated boundary. Is that the desired outcome?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-01-20 02:48:58+00:00): Halifax.ca is tr website for the the Halifax Regional Municipality ( The actual name)  people got this confused with the logo but the official name is  Halifax Regional Municipality  which the municipality states on that website
mueschel (2022-01-11 19:43:56+00:00): It seems something went wrong here. I can't spot any of these features on any aerial image. In addition, there are about 3000 warnings and errors from the validator.
PeteGLH (2022-01-11 20:22:41+00:00): Hello.  This data was old historical data from 1967,  it was added for historical purposes but given that most of the data was imported with JOSM based on DXF data and transfered into SHP and the OSM,  many relations were erroneous.  

I deleted all the inputs as they did not reflect current day conditions.
RicoElectrico (2022-01-11 15:51:33+00:00): Wielkie dzięki! Mało komu chce się ruszyć i aktualizować POI :)
hatul (2022-01-19 07:59:01+00:00): תודה על התרומה
כדאי לתייג נכון, לא מדובר בתצפית.
GOwin (2022-01-11 06:05:05+00:00): If this road actually serves the construction site, then it is inappropriate to disconnect this road. I restored the connection, and added "access=private" tag to this segment since you implied its used by the construction site.
eggie (2022-01-11 09:49:55+00:00): Lijkt me prima zo.. 
'k Had het ooit zelf als pedestrian getagd omdat het niet helemaal duidelijk was. Nu wel. 
Gr eggie
Wolderik (2022-01-11 22:15:58+00:00): Waarschijnlijk is hier iets misgegaan. Punt van huisnr. 76 is verplaatst naar garage van nr. 80. Kun je wijziging controleren ?
Fietsgw1 (2022-01-11 23:13:07+00:00): Hier is inderdaad iets mis gegaan maar ik weet even niet hoe ik dit ongedaan moet maken.
Ik zal in het vervolg zorgvuldiger zijn.
Mijn excuses.
eggie (2022-01-12 07:38:19+00:00): Houi.. Het adres heb ik hersteld en de verouderde landuse gras en bos heb ik verwijderd van de woningen.
MVG
eggie
GOwin (2022-01-11 05:57:33+00:00): Hi Aldrine! Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM), and thank you for improving the map of your favorite neighbourhood.

The simplest way to do what you want is to add a node, and tag it as a neighbourhood. However, since you already added a residential area, I added the name to it instead, and made some changes to its geometry. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005218602

If you're keen to know more about OSM, and mapping in general, you might want to check out the local communities available in your platform or social network: https://osm.org/wiki/PH

For sure, fellow volunteers  would be happy to answer your questions, or other concerns.

Keep up the good work!
GOwin (2022-01-11 05:58:45+00:00): By the way, I know you wanted to add the neighbourhood's name, and appended it to the street name, so I took those out, because they really aren't part of those features.