piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-10-16 13:30:49+00:00): Je verwijderde hier de landuse=grass .
Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Ik heb deze wijzigingen teruggezet.
Leisure=park is de functie van een gebied en geen landuse. 
Hier een voorbeeld van een park: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665
De functie Leisure park ligt helemaal los over alles heen.
eggie (2017-10-16 13:34:44+00:00): reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52977365
wegens  verwijdering landuse 3dshapes en omzetten in park.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
eggie (2017-10-16 17:09:11+00:00): Als voorbeeld van landude heb ik wat bomen toegevoegd. Wanneer het "park" en naam heeft kan over alles heen een vlak leisure=park, name-.....
Niet al het groen is park in de zin van....
4004 (2017-10-16 21:44:39+00:00): копировать без авторских прав не совсем по канонам осм
eggie (2017-10-16 13:28:25+00:00): Diergaarde Blijdorp was reeds gemapt op de kaart. Hier verwijder je de landuse. Ik zal de changeset terugdraaien.
eggie (2017-10-16 13:36:47+00:00): Reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52977491
wegens verwijderen landuse 3dshapes. De dierentuin is hier al getagd. 
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Eduard Popov (2017-10-24 06:29:21+00:00): Спасибо за вклад в OSM. Пожалуйста прочитайте соглашение по именованиям улиц https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F. Должны быть без сокращений.
ThomasA (2017-10-16 10:27:23+00:00): Er denne konstruktion OK, hvor de individuelle bygninger er multipolygoner pga. "hullerne", men, hvor de samtidig er medlemmer af ét stort samlende multipolygon for at tagge dem som et kollegium med navn?
Hjart (2017-10-16 10:37:05+00:00): Josm's validator protesterer ikke over det, men mp'erne på de enkelte bygningerne er på den anden side ikke længere nødvendige.
Hjart (2017-10-16 10:43:42+00:00): Det er super du eksperimenterer med multipolygoner. Mig tog det lang tid rigtigt at gennemskue dem og jeg tror der er rigtig mange der ikke rigtig forstår dem.
Der er en del tilfælde hvor de virkelig gør gavn, men af hensyn til de mange der ikke forstår dem, er det en god ide ikke at overdrive brugen af dem.
ThomasA (2017-10-16 10:53:18+00:00): Bør jeg i stedet slet de mindre MPer for enkeltbygningerne?
Hjart (2017-10-16 10:54:41+00:00): Når nu du har en MP der dækker alle bygningerne kan du med fordel slette de mindre
ThomasA (2017-10-16 11:01:29+00:00): OK, det har jeg gjort nu (#52978614)
Hjart (2017-10-16 10:18:43+00:00): Dette er en fin måde at gøre det på (i dette tilfælde) (Se også min PM)
ThomasA (2017-10-16 10:19:59+00:00): OK. Jeg synes dog, det ser lidt "funny" ud, at der kommer navn på de små bygninger også.
Hjart (2017-10-16 10:24:14+00:00): Det er rigtigt at der kommer navne på de små bygninger også, men det bør nok ses som en bug/begrænsning i https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto.
Det er ikke usandsynligt at andre kort (så som dem i Osmand eller Maps.me) håndterer det mere hensigtsmæssigt.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:05:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Constable (2017-10-16 13:18:32+00:00): ciao, questo edificio esiste ancora o è stato abbattuto? nel primo caso il tag building=* deve rimanere, adesso risulta come un'area industriale, non come edificio. Stesso problema qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248921271
L'area è una cosa, l'edificio un'altra. Se guardi la parte più ad est di questa zona commerciale noterai che è tutta compresa in un'area taggata come landuse=industrial, significa che quell'area è industriale ma al suo interno sono visibili i vari edifici, taggati come building=*, qua si può fare altrettanto ma gli edifici in se devono avere il tag building=*.

Questo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248924508 invece non risulta proprio sulla mappa perché privo di qualsiasi tag che identifichi la natura di quell'area, è un edificio quindi bisogna aggiungere il tag building=* e siccome l'edificio Din Hao è già mappato, quell'area NON deve essere sovrapposta a Din Hao.
Questo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158727357 è inutile, non ha senso che sia sovrapposto ad edifici già mappati.
Idem qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248486086 e qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/208514365
Per la viabilità mi fido delle tue modifiche, appena passo controllo e nel caso modifico, occhio però che questa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248486081 di sicuro non è una strada residenziale, perché li di case non mi pare ce ne fossero l'ultima volta che sono passato, la farei diventare unclassified o service, forse meglio unclassified. L'ingresso al benzinaio può avvenire da qua e da qua o solo da uno dei due punti? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532912790 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532912789, inoltre quei due tratti non sono parking aisle ma solo highway=service, parking aisle sono solo le corsie ai lati delle quali ci sono parcheggi, questi invece sono solo due passaggi di accesso al benzianio, probabile che siano anche a senso unico, concordi?
Per favore correggi e se hai dubbi scrivi pure qua che troviamo una soluzione, grazie mille per la collaborazione, ciao
Constable (2017-10-16 13:19:55+00:00): visto che conosci la zona, riesci ad aggiungere anche questa attività https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/769231 ? mi sembrava fosse un ristorante/fast food ma non ricordo con precisione, ti sarei grato se riuscissi ad aggiungerlo.
Grazie mille, ciao
mavl (2018-12-25 20:18:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:03:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
freebeer (2018-05-04 07:11:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58669636 where the changeset comment is: Clean maps.me private residences spam for GDPR and Notes spring-clean
mavl (2018-12-25 19:46:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mueschel (2017-10-17 19:18:41+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded more than 50 buildings with the t "builing". Could you have a look and fix this spelling mistake?

Cheers, Jan
mavl (2018-12-25 20:46:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
zstadler (2017-11-12 01:41:37+00:00): Hi Dumkoff and welcome to OSM!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532917349 was no tags.
Please tag it or delete it.
zstadler (2017-12-05 12:59:24+00:00): Hi,
Could you please respond?
zstadler (2021-07-11 21:52:27+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54433140
mavl (2018-12-25 19:34:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:31:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:19:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-10-16 13:52:28+00:00): Dag Hooglander... Tip.. probeer het oude pad om te taggen van fietspad naar pad. dan blijft de Historie intact.
Anders kunnen we niet zien wie er allemaal aan gewerkt heeft. Martin Borsje was de voorgaande mapper.
Hooglander94 (2017-10-16 15:38:12+00:00): Dan is er ergens wat misgegaan. Het was niet mijn bedoeling om een "nieuwe" weg te maken. Wat ik gedaan heb is (in iD) het stuk fietspad gepakt en heb op "cycle path" geklikt (de change feature knop) om dit vervolgens naar "path" aan te passen.

Hoe kan ik het volgende keer beter aanpakken zodat het dezelfde weg blijft?
eggie (2017-10-16 16:10:01+00:00): Je procedure is goed. Zal nog eens kijken.
Dit was je changeset. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52978920
eggie (2017-10-16 16:46:31+00:00): Wanneer je in achavi op legend klikt zie je de uitleg van de kleurtjes op de way's . Je moet ook op de way's zelf klikken om de historie te lezen. Geel is nieuw en niet omgezet...., maar het was maar een opmerking..
mapse. :)
mavl (2018-12-25 20:41:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
majid1359 (2017-10-16 11:26:05+00:00): اصلاح شد
majid1359 (2017-10-16 11:28:25+00:00): اصلاح شد
user_5359 (2017-10-16 16:45:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for better description of payment ! What means ACH and please more details as Credit Card
Constable (2017-10-16 15:17:02+00:00): ciao, mappato così però questo bar risulta nel parcheggio, per favore spostalo nella posizione esatta
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5171075934
Sai anche il nome?
Grazie
tonyf1 (2017-11-30 01:48:28+00:00): Hi. You tagged a bank named House. Is this your house? OSM is not the place for marking private data if that is what you have done. If not, my apologies. Either way a bank is not usually called house?
tonyf1 (2017-11-30 23:57:56+00:00): No reply so deleted Bank named House with Changeset #54219712
eggie (2017-10-16 13:41:55+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
user_5359 (2017-10-16 16:41:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
R0bst3r (2017-10-17 20:19:55+00:00): Wichtig dürfte hier die Access Regeln und der Poller (arrier=bollard) im Osten des Weges sein. Aktuell ist der Weg durch access=no unbenutzbar. Ein foot=yes müsste extra ausgewertet werden.
Was macht den der Bus, wie kommt der an die Haltestelle?
Weder die Access regeln noch der Poller sieht einen Bus vor. 
Einen extra Gehweg einzuzeichnen ist möglich, aber nicht nötig.
Viele Grüße
Oisín (2017-10-18 12:15:00+00:00): An einen Poller kann ich mich nicht erinnern. Da steht nur ein Zeichen mit Zufahrtsverbot mit Ausnahme für Busse. Aufgefallen ist mir das Problem hier, da mich mein Routingprogramm zu Fuß hier nicht lang lässt. Das wollte ich ändern.
R0bst3r (2017-10-18 17:26:45+00:00): Ich hab mich mal mittels vor Ort Bilder informiert. Einen Poller kann ich auch nicht erkennen. Das access=no hab ich entfernt und durch motor_vehicle=no ersetzt, ein oft gemachter Fehler. Sollte mit einer neuen Karte nun tun.
gazember8 (2017-10-29 13:58:58+00:00): Čo označuje bod "DJ Ice" v bytovom dome?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5171150622
FredrikLindseth (2017-10-16 19:56:29+00:00): This isnt a bus stop.  The place you have placed this is the stop location of Bybanen. 
Maybe you should reconsider and move or remove this? :-)
literan (2017-10-17 09:34:09+00:00): Добрый день. Не понимаю, зачем вы две совпадающие линии нарисовали - amenity=kindergarten и barrier=fence (да еще и на здании дубль amenity=kindergarten  остался). Вычистил все дубли.
literan (2017-10-17 10:02:47+00:00): И здесь вы продублировали теги школы - на здании и на территории
yaugenka (2018-03-31 09:02:33+00:00): привет! я удали этот нп
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7656265#map=16/54.0906/25.2782
потому что он уже был рядом
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7509281#map=15/54.0918/25.2691
Prusaker (2018-03-31 17:53:14+00:00): Скорее всего я его не заметил рядом, поэтому сделал как новый.

Есть предложение - перенести точку label в то место нп, которое на трассе находится. Всё же логичнее будет, чтобы центр был там, а не в поле, куда особо и не доедешь.
yaugenka (2018-03-31 18:04:25+00:00): Переносите, если считаете нужным.
majid1359 (2017-10-16 12:57:57+00:00): اصلاح شد
majid1359 (2017-10-16 12:59:04+00:00): اصلاح شد
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-29 00:25:02+00:00): HI, way 175638841 has access=no, but has the North Cheshire Way along it. Can you check whether it is open to pedestrians?

Thanks,
Mike
majid1359 (2017-10-16 13:05:36+00:00): اصلاح شد
majid1359 (2017-10-16 13:11:00+00:00): اصلاح شد
ACS1986 (2017-10-16 13:54:02+00:00): Hi Manny,
Welcome to OSM. It's great to have a new mapper. Unfortunately, as well as your useful additions, you accidentally deleted a bus route relation and turned part of the A49 into a path. I've changed these back, so no harm done. If you need any help with anything please feel free to ask.
Adam
Manny Seddon (2017-10-16 13:58:23+00:00): Hi That part of the A49 out of Wigan now runs via Southgate, and it is now a path: https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.5416152,-2.647048,19.04z?hl=en
Manny Seddon (2017-10-16 13:59:22+00:00): https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.5415724,-2.6477266,104m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=en
Manny Seddon (2017-10-16 13:59:56+00:00): https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@53.5419021,-2.6472202,3a,75y,251.22h,90t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sjBYQTOmY8diDc_1ymFP7Yg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DjBYQTOmY8diDc_1ymFP7Yg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D240.22594%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en
ACS1986 (2017-10-16 15:13:29+00:00): Okay, sorry. That's an unsual one. I've put that back how it was. I assume the bus route deletion was unintentional? We can't use Google maps as a source by the way.
All the best,
Adam
Manny Seddon (2017-10-16 15:18:34+00:00): Thanks Adam, 

I live round the corner from here, and only used GM to prove it had changed.

What are valid sources?

Manny
Manny Seddon (2017-10-16 15:47:48+00:00): Hi Adam,

I removed the bus route as the buses use Pottery Road / Southgate outbound from Wigan.

Manny
ACS1986 (2017-10-16 16:31:35+00:00): Hi manny,
Acceptable sources: Your own local knowledge and anything you survey on the ground + any of the background layers available in the osm editors. Any other maps found online are likely to be copyright and unuseable in OSM.

Bus routes are mapped as 'relations' which effectively list of all the different road sections making up the route. Rather than delete the whole relation (ie. the whole bus route) you wanted to delete the incorrect road sections from the relation (and add the correct new sections of the route). I appreciate that this is far from obvious. Relations aren't the easiest starting point for a new mapper. I've corrected the bus route so it now goes along Pottery Lane and Southgate.
Kind regards,
Adam
majid1359 (2017-10-16 13:15:02+00:00): اصلاح شد
gileri (2017-10-16 17:19:54+00:00): Bonjour/re :)

Le tag operator est utilisé pour indiquer le gérant d'un établissement ou objet.

Il arrive régulièrement que ces enseignes soient des franchises ou la gestion est déléguée à une autre entité. Par exemple la majorité des McDonalds sont des franchises, et là par exemple les Celio peuvent l'être aussi :

http://www.celio.com/services/decouvrir-celio#c-partenaire-affilie

Le meilleur endroit pour trouver l'entreprise gérant la franchise est sur les factures ou tickets de caisse.

Voici ce que j'aurais mis pour le Celio par exemple :

name=Celio Lyon République
brand=Celio
operator=(Le gérant ou entreprise)
website=http://store.celio.com/vetement-homme/lyon-republique/0181

Et sans tags addr:* car ils sont déjà présents dans un nœud à côté.
DD1GJ (2017-10-16 19:22:16+00:00): Alles zurückgesetzt, nach Bayern DOP 80 normale EFH-Gärten
M!dgard (2017-10-16 13:23:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 52951834, 52952741, 52953201, 52953572, 52953955, 52954624, 52955126, 52955353, 52955681, 52955827, 52955844, 52955976, 52962197, 52962898, 52962947, 52963004, 52963032.
DD1GJ (2017-10-16 19:00:24+00:00): Wurde auch das ganze Gebäude abgerissen? Falls nein, kann ich es wieder herstellen.
Geoinfo15BI (2017-10-17 05:47:59+00:00): Ja, das ganze Gebäude wurde abgerissen. Dort wird zur Zeit ein Wohngebäude gebaut.
mavl (2017-10-16 15:04:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44844620, 44844669, 44845441, 44845753, 44845875, 44846944, 44863450, 44863510, 44864255, 44864976, 44865453, 44865585, 44868885, 44869630, 44870270, 44871531, 44872061, 44872464, 44872535, 44872596, 44872743, 44872863, 44872884, 44873041, 44873141, 44890289, 44890532, 44890639, 44890973, 44891117, 44891441, 44891531, 44891708.
mavl (2017-10-16 16:56:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет из реки Нияп несколько десятков точек. Река была нарисована достаточно точно. С чем связано удаление точек и снижение точности?
Supaplex (2018-01-20 13:30:46+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Hjart (2017-10-16 20:26:09+00:00): Bemærk at når du gør stykket det lille stykke mellem de to "baner" på Roskildevej ensrettet, bliver dine svingforbud overflødige.
WarpQ (2017-10-17 08:00:58+00:00): Hej Hjart.
Det har jeg tænkt over - det er bevidst, men hvis det strider mod god praksis, så skal det naturligvis gøres anderledes. Teknisk set er det lille vejstykke ikke ensrettet - der er blot svingforbud, som gør det defacto ensrettet. Min tanke bag at registrere det som ensrettet var, at mens svingforbudene ikke bliver vist på kortet (i hvert fald ikke hos mig), så bliver ensretninger vist som pile - det bliver derfor nemmere at læse kortet. Men det er svingforbudene, som er 'korrekte'.
Hvad vil i din erfaring være bedst praksis?
MrMoehritz (2020-03-24 10:15:09+00:00): Hey vogelfreier,
warum hast du damals den Abschnitt der A3 beim Barackenlager Rotbachtal als landuse=raceway eingestuft? Waren da so viele Raser unterwegs ;-)
vogelfreier (2020-03-27 08:31:20+00:00): Hallo MrMoehritz, für die meisten Landnutzungen gibt es entsprechende Werte/Annehmlichkeiten, aber für (Schnell)Straßen gibt es keine Werte - deswegen.
Mir war schon damals aufgefallen das für manche z.B. das Wohngebiet nur für den einen Häuserblock eingezeichnet war fest mit der äußeren Gebäudelinie verbunden und dazwischen im (Wohn)Straßen Bereich eine weiße Fläche blieb (nach meiner Ansicht aber das Wohngebiet nicht am Wohnblock endet sondern darüber hinaus geht).
Da ich damals unten im Loche, am ehemaligen Lager von West nach Ost und dann gen Süden vorbei geradelt war, weiß ich nicht mehr wieviele schräg oberhalb durch gebrettert waren.
Gruß vogelfreier/Rüdiger
MrMoehritz (2020-04-01 05:35:00+00:00): Ja das mit den Landnutzungen ist so ne Sache. Ich stimme dir voll zu, dass es keine weißen Flächen geben sollte. Allerdings ist dieser Abschnitt der A3 jetzt zusammen mit dem Hockenheimring und dem Nürburgring eine von 3 Rennstrecken in Deutschland :-)
Auch wenn das proposal für landuse=highway aufgegeben wurde: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/landuse%3Dhighway ist dieser tag schon ca 17000 mal in Benutzung. Hab ihn deshalb hier auch eingefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82901230
literan (2017-10-17 10:46:19+00:00): вся ваша правка, увы, некорректна. Откачу. Если интересны подробности - пишите
Hjart (2017-10-16 21:22:31+00:00): Ifølge de officielle kort/addresser (se http://danmarksadresser.dk/) er der netop et mellemrum. Måske det er jeres vejskilte der er stavet forkert?
WarpQ (2017-10-17 07:51:58+00:00): Interessant! Det var min barndoms 'gade' siden 1985, og vejskiltet er ældre. Ét eller andet sted er der i hvert fald skrevet forkert - på skiltet eller i databasen. Jeg vil forsøge at finde ud af det. Tak for input.
gendy54 (2017-11-21 23:53:03+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourquoi avoir supprimé les modifs de la caserne des pompiers. Je viens de voir dans la presse locale qu'elle était opérationnelle.
Moissac (2017-11-23 07:45:49+00:00): Il devait y avoir un doublon ou elle était mal cartographié surement. La caserne est bien cartographié. J'ai supprimé le point il me semble, car il y a déjà le polygone.
P Dappen (2017-10-16 15:15:48+00:00): Deleted lots of incorrect roads in this area
P Dappen (2017-10-16 15:16:29+00:00): And updated features.  I live in this area.
user_5359 (2017-10-16 16:28:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What type of business you are?
chnav (2017-10-18 13:09:07+00:00): Hi, you have deleted name in Russian and replaced it with Kazakh. Please note you delete valid information, instead of copying it to relevant tags. All you edits to be reverted, sorry.
hanzlan (2017-10-18 14:40:17+00:00): Hey, sorry that was a bit too shortsighted and fast to change all names to kazakh names. My decision to do it this way came from the official language in kazakhstan and to put name:ru to all cities instead to have name, name:kk and name:ru and ideally name:en in the end so everyone can find the city's name in each language.
chnav (2017-10-18 14:55:04+00:00): Hi, I went through you edits in Kazakhstan and returned most default names to Russian as it was before and as local mappers agree right now. I also kept useful information like German names and wikidata.  

We know multi-language problem will arise in Kazakhstan sooner or later, but right now we have no exact procedure or agreement how and WHOM will do it. It will affect thousands and thousands addresses with associatedStreet relation etc.
user_6110846 (2017-10-18 16:04:46+00:00): Казахский язык надо вернуть в name/ 

Но без удаления русского. Русский должен перенесен в name ru/ Много стран из СНГ бывшего концлагеря СССР  уже давно картографируют на родном языке. Из стран етого региона Таджикистан Узбекистан (начали процесс )   Юго Западные соседи как Грузия Азербайджан Украина Молдова (кроме Приднестровья  ) Армения. Чем Казахстан хуже? Просто это делать без вандализма. Под вандализмом я имею ввиду удаление из базы какого то либо языка.
chnav (2017-10-18 16:09:19+00:00): Пожалуйста позвольте нам, местным маперам, самим решать что и как делать.
user_6110846 (2017-10-18 16:31:16+00:00): В Белорусси местные маперы уже нарешали. 
80 процентов указателей на белорусском а карта на русском. И 4 картографа блокируют переход на белорусский . Их фотографии аргументы не интересуют . Их  и правила on ground по знакам  не интересуют.

Если в Казахстане указатели  НП на казахском то в теге нейм должен быть казахский . Если знаки на двох языках  т о надо смотреть соотношение каких больше.  В правилах ведения дискуссий нет упоминания о запрете  участия варягов с далека в дискуссии. 

Если мояя пазиция пративоречить Вашей -- -  это не повод выдворять меня с дискуссии.. Я имею право соблюдая этику общения  защищать позицию  казахского языка.