piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2024-05-18 17:11:00+00:00): Hi, next time please reuse or update the existing objects, instead of adding duplicates. Like you did for apartments and restaurant Marinero. Also there is no building=restaurant. It is was a leisure=outdoor_seating in this case.
Frans S (2021-10-10 10:15:39+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112293473
ivanbranco (2021-10-16 10:03:55+00:00): Hi aamapn,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991396142/

they charge in euros?
jonrellim (2021-10-09 22:14:24+00:00): Hoi!

Goed dat je de winkels update in de binnenstad. Ik wil je alleen vragen om bij de winkels die je verwijdert de adres nodes te laten staan, en enkel de winkelinformatie uit de node te verwijderen. Ik snap dat de logische reactie is om de node compleet te verwijderen, maar het adres bestaat namelijk nog wel. Die worden geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG. Ik heb een aantal adressen zelf hersteld in deze edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112316422

Ook is het handig voor iedereen als er bij de changeset een beschrijving wordt gegeven die aangeeft wat er veranderd is. 

Groeten en map ze
HiddeWie (2021-10-10 10:04:24+00:00): Beste jonrellim,

Excuses, ik zal de adres nodes weer terugzetten. Ik heb niet goed gekeken of er meer informatie aanwezig was dan alleen de winkels. Op de meeste plekken zijn de adres nodes gescheiden van de 'functionele' nodes zoals winkels (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element). Er zijn namelijk winkels met meer dan 1 adres, of adressen met meerdere winkels erin.

> Ook is het handig voor iedereen als er bij de changeset een beschrijving wordt gegeven die aangeeft wat er veranderd is.

Ja, dat zag ik ook net. Vespucci toonde geen scherm om een commentaar te uploaden. Dat is misschien een bug. Normaal doet hij dat wel.

Groeten
HiddeWie (2021-10-10 10:17:42+00:00): Revert changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112327606
JeroenvanderGun (2021-10-21 22:15:23+00:00): Yes but also no.

The British government indeed claims the British Antarctic Territory as part of its overseas territories. However, like other signatories of the Antarctic Treaty, the British government legally cannot do anything that supports its claim and hence justifies tagging with boundary=administrative.

For details, see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Antarctic_Territory
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Antarctica

All other Antarctic territorial claims are also tagged as non-administrative regions - this also includes e.g. the "French Southern and Antarctic Lands" OSM relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2186658 from which the actual Antarctic lands are omitted for the same reason.

I therefore undid your use of boundary=administrative on the British Antarctic Territory.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-10-10 09:54:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 112326845 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some spam.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5374 .
klnkengi (2021-12-03 20:18:30+00:00): Hallo,
mir ist aufgefallen, dass Du öfter "name" für die Beschreibung eines Objekts benutzt, das Du hinzufügst. "Name" sollte allerdings nur benutzt werden, wenn ein Objekt einen Eigennamen hat. Dieser Bankautomat in Spanien z.B. heißt aber bestimmt nicht so.
Danke für Deine Ergänzungen der Karte und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-10-10 09:54:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 112326845 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some spam.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5374 .
zorglubu (2021-10-09 21:35:24+00:00): Bonjour,
il reste un highway nommé "Place Firmin Gémier", ne serait-ce pas un oubli ?
Shohreh (2021-10-10 08:52:18+00:00): Ŝûrement, puisque j'ai juste modifié les tags de la place, ce qui n'avait pas été fait par la personne qui a ajouté le fixme
zorglubu (2021-10-10 15:05:01+00:00): Je n'avais vu le fixme de "josmougn". J'ai corrigé le nom.
Frans S (2021-10-12 10:44:46+00:00): Hallo.
Even een opmerking.
Kan het zijn dat je Mapbox image een offset heeft?
Ik moet nogal wat schuiven met jouw mappings. 
Dit is de offset die ik meet tov mijn Mapbox. Settings op 0. (ik heb dit ook bij andere changesets van jou gemerkt.
Vr groeten
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112294937
Kraan46 (2021-10-12 11:00:51+00:00): Klopt Frans, ik heb dat pas na enkele tasks gemerkt. En wist niet hoe ik dit op de reeds ready verklaarde nog kon rechtzetten. Sorry voor de hinder.
Frans S (2021-10-12 11:33:30+00:00): Je kunt dit gemakkelijk zelf doen door je Changeset te openen in JOSM en al  je eigen mappings selecteren, dan in 1 keer goed zetten. Ik heb er al een aantal gecorrigeerd.
groeten
eggie (2021-10-09 11:51:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Het is helaas niet de bedoeling om adressen te gaan toevoegen aan een gebouwomtrek. Ik zal het adres weer verwijderen.
Er zijn hier al adresnodes. 
Nr 28 heb ik even in het midden gelegd. Je kunt verder gerust met de adresnodes schuiven. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-09 14:18:17+00:00): 28 ligt op het gebouw nu.. rendering duurt even. Alle nodes liggen nu los.
Gr eggie
Frans S (2021-10-10 10:12:22+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112295038
Anazaar (2021-12-03 22:10:45+00:00): man_made=manhole

Bunkier obserwacyjny przy zaporze w Ołoboku zakryty deklem od kanalizacji i usunąłeś naniesiony bunkier i zrobiłeś z niego "kanalizację" :-) Kilka razy spotkałem zakryte deklem takie bunkry obserwacyjne, bo dekiel od kanalizy idealnie pasuje :-)
Anazaar (2021-12-03 22:27:55+00:00): ... taki sam zakryty deklem od kanalizy przy jeziorku w Gryżynie nie zmieniłeś na kanalizę :-) Chyba że dekiel złomiarze ponieśli :-) Dawno tam nie byłem :-) Dużo takich bunkrów już całkiem zasypano. W Ołoboku przy każdym moście chyba były ;-)
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:15:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-10-10 09:54:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 112326845 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some spam.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5374 .
marc__marc (2024-09-28 14:37:56+00:00): Hello,
it's wanted to change leaf_cycle=evergreen into source=evergreen ?
Regards,
Marc
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:18:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-10-10 09:54:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 112326845 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some spam.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5374 .
Supaplex (2021-10-10 05:35:42+00:00): 如果確定單行道，非單行道的話，其實不用移除相關標籤
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112296414
nfx2851 (2021-10-10 16:23:53+00:00): 抱歉，我不太了解您的意思？
Supaplex (2021-10-10 19:12:22+00:00): oneway=no 的標籤被移除了
原來是表示是雙向道
Lejun (2021-10-09 12:16:13+00:00): Un recalibrage de tous les éléments à l’intérieur est nécessaire, avec cette fois l’avantage que ce sera mieux positionné
SomeoneElse (2021-10-09 12:35:26+00:00): Hello Dougie and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
While looking at something completely different, I happened to notice this change - and was a bit confused about the comment "#hotosm-project-10694 #uaigeo #youthmappers".  I'm guessing that the first hashtag refers to https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/10694/tasks/ , but that seems to be mostly about buildings in riverside villages?
One thing that would really help other mappers would be if your changeset comment had a bit more information (actual words, not just hashtags).  This isn't your fault - that HOT task says "Changeset comment:#hotosm-project-10694 #uaigeo #youthmappers", so I'll ask the person who created that task to change it.
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
confusedbuffalo (2021-10-10 15:34:52+00:00): Looks like you had a typo on a number of these, they should have been SW13 8.. not SW13 9..
I've fixed them using the NSUL postcodes layer.
(Found using https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-errors.html )
Wynndale (2021-10-10 21:00:51+00:00): Thanks.
Mundilfari (2021-10-09 15:49:01+00:00): Spam. Reverted in changeset 112306465
hsc666 (2021-10-09 19:40:56+00:00): Hallo pieb_scchnurz,

Dein Eintrag sieht erfunden und damit nach Vandalismus aus. Ich habe ihn deshalb einstweilen zurückgesetzt. Es steht Dir frei, einen Nachweis über die Existenz Deines Kunstwerkes zu erbringen.

VG
hsc666
pieb_scchnurz (2021-10-09 20:07:51+00:00): Nachweiis: https://velocityruhr.net/blog/2021/10/08/kunst-im-oeffentlichen-raum/
hsc666 (2021-10-09 20:18:02+00:00): Offensichtlich weder ein Kunstwerk, noch ein Objekt dauerhafter Natur. Tatsächlich Vandalismus - sowohl vor Ort, als auch Dein Eintrag hier in OSM.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-04 00:29:26+00:00): Opa Raphael, esta via https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991450828 por exemplo você mapeou como footway, mas não está correto pois ela não é somente para pedestre, então poderia ser path, mas como passa carro poderia ainda ser track, e até unclassified + unpaved.
Raphaelkaart (2022-03-07 10:58:09+00:00): Bom Dia Erick!

Já estou verificando o mapeamento que fiz.

atenciosamente,

Raphael
Mundilfari (2021-10-09 15:47:01+00:00): Spam. reverted in changeset 112306412
marczoutendijk (2021-10-09 18:14:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5374

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
skquinn (2021-10-10 14:32:28+00:00): I'd like to think United Airlines knows better than to spam like this. This is one of the most blatant spamming/vandalism attempts I've seen in a long time.

To the DWG, thanks for all you do in keeping rubbish off the map.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
eggie (2021-10-09 13:36:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Wanneer het de officiele naam is kan het uiteraard op de kaart. Het bruggetje heb ik ook maar even die straatnaam gegeven. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-09 13:38:41+00:00): Dag Heer T. 

Lijkt me helemaal oke..
MVG
eggie
Глеб (2023-10-05 20:52:50+00:00): Для БКТП существует тег official_short_type
fndoder (2023-10-05 21:07:38+00:00): OK
Frans S (2021-10-10 10:10:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
PLease map more accurate, you indcludes sometimes a part of the trees in your mappings
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112299981
vulasala (2021-10-11 09:26:14+00:00): Hi Tiew SF,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 991461300 from service to residential, as the area is residential.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112300462
user_2066394 (2021-10-10 15:16:16+00:00): Ist das Teil innerhalb weniger Tage verschwunden?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/2485395182
Enrico Zini (2021-10-11 11:33:39+00:00): In that place there is no signboard, and in that area no signboard about the Solepumpanlage.

There is only a small little signboard with a few lines about the history of the place, but not in that place: it's at the cave entrance significantly more south.

I don't know what you mean with "weniger Tage": the last edit before mine was in 2013
eggie (2021-10-09 14:06:32+00:00): Dag Freek,

Bedankt voor je bijdrage. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
ma-rt-in (2021-10-14 17:54:08+00:00): Hallo,
dir ist aber bekannt, das wir keine Freigabe zur Nutzung von maps.rlp.de haben !?

vg
Foxxi59 (2021-10-15 19:32:22+00:00): Hi,

ja das ist bekannt. Ich habe das nur als Beispiel genommen, da ich nicht eine Kopie meines Ausweises nehmen wollte.
CU
ma-rt-in (2021-10-15 20:38:38+00:00): Hallo,

sowas besser nicht tun, dann eher als source => survey oder knowledge verwenden.

vg
aceman444 (2021-10-23 16:11:49+00:00): Zdravim, ked pridavate par obchodov, odosielajte nejake logicke skupiny naraz, na jednom geografickom mieste. Nie par nesuvisiacich objektov po celom Slovensku.
PizzaCutter (2021-10-23 16:26:37+00:00): Normálne odosielam všetko naraz z jedného miesta. To parkovisko čo je úplne mimo je zabudnuté z predchádzajúcich úprav v OsmAND, ale chápem.
szalona_entropia (2021-12-07 13:00:28+00:00): Nie chodzi tu o nawigacje, tylko o zasady mapowania węzłów drogowych. Dlaczego nagle węzeł dróg primary miałby być otagowany secondary?
maraf24 (2021-12-07 23:28:09+00:00): A jakie są te zasady mapowanie węzłow drogowych?
I dlaczego Bracka tutaj miałaby być węzłem drogowym?
szalona_entropia (2021-12-08 00:57:57+00:00): Na tym węźle relacja z Chorzowskiej od Parku Śląskiego na DTŚ kierunek zachód (albo vice versa) przebiega przez Bracką. Nie wiem, czemu muszę tłumaczyć rzeczy oczywiste. A jakie są zasady mapowania węzłów to też dobrze wiesz bo była o tym dyskusja na początku roku. Przeczytaj sobie na wiki jeśli zapomniałeś.
Yunkers (2021-12-08 06:56:40+00:00): Nie każdy węzeł pozwala skręcić w każdym kierunku. Bracka to nie węzeł, to zwykła droga łącząca dwie drogi primary jakich mnóstwo i to nie robi z niej "węzła". Dyskusja o łącznicach nie ma znaczenia, bo ona dotyczyła dróg motorway i trunk.
szalona_entropia (2021-12-08 11:06:03+00:00): Ten węzeł jest nietypowy, ale pozwala skręcić w każdym kierunku i Bracka jest jego elementem. Ale ewidentnie nie dojdziemy do porozumienia.
szalona_entropia (2021-12-08 11:06:44+00:00): A tak w ogóle to cała Bracka i Bocheńskiego do A4 powinna być primary
Yunkers (2021-12-08 12:27:51+00:00): Skoro nie masz w planach się porozumieć to po co piszesz? I nie, nie powinna być primary, głównym zjazdem A4-DTŚ jest Murckowska, nie ma potrzeby dwóch primary mających taką samą funkcję na tak małym terenie. Nawet nie wydaje mi się, żeby zjazdy z A4 na Bocheńskiego były jakoś sensownie ułożone żeby to oznaczyć w ten sposób i nie narobić kolorowego bałaganu ;)
szalona_entropia (2021-12-09 11:18:40+00:00): Murckowska nie jest główną trasą dojazdową do A4 dla tranzytu od strony Poznania (Bytomia). Znaki kierują na Bocheńskiego. Z tego powodu primary jest uzasadnione
Yunkers (2021-12-09 20:30:05+00:00): To nie do końca dobre miejsce na tę dyskusję. Nie jestem lokalsem, więc nie jestem w stanie dokładnie określić wszystkich czynników ani nigdy nie podważałem słuszności lub niesłuszności oznaczenia tego ciągu jako secondary. Poprawiłem Bracką, bo zauważyłem, że została zmieniona wskutek błędnych/niejasnych powodów. Poza tym, nie musisz mnie przekonywać, zmiana i komentarz do niej powinny być wystarczającym wytłumaczeniem, staram się zawsze przeglądać historię przed zmianą kategorii, tutaj wytłumaczenia nie było żadnego, więc uznałem to za błąd. Oczywiście jeśli uważasz, że cały ten ciąg jest primary to zmieniaj, jeśli chcesz moją poradę to ja bym nie zmieniał :)
complete_gth (2021-10-16 14:48:07+00:00): Moin, du hast hier bei einigen Gebäude die du verfeinert hast den ehemaligen Grundriss gelöscht (z.B.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332108836/history#map=17/50.96560/10.72933 ) und dann wieder in einzelnen Gebäuden hinzugefügt. Könntest du in Zukunft versuchen die History zu erhalten (natürlich nur bei vertretbaren Aufwand)?
Wenn du nur Dachformen usw. hinzufügen willst kannst du auch building:part=* nutzen.
hmkaiser (2021-10-18 06:46:18+00:00): Guten Morgen,
ich gucke mir vor jeder Änderung die Chronik an und entscheide dann nach Aufwand. "building:part" verwende ich je nach Situation.
Da über die Flächen "Gothaer Fahrzeugbau/Schmitz Cargobull" alle Adress-Infos abgebildet sind, lassen sich einzelne Gebäude, vor allem über die Dachform selektiert, gut erfassen. Leider sind viele Industrieareale in OSM nicht so gut abgebildet wie hier.
Ich benutze die OSM-Daten als Grundlage für eine 3D-Simulation.
KittuAM (2022-01-30 08:58:53+00:00): Hi mate already aerodrome:type tag is existed do you really think again aerodrome=international is necessary.
mweper (2022-01-30 11:45:19+00:00): Hi. Researching in the wiki, you are right. It seems that "aerodrome" is abandoned and was replaced by "aerodrome:type". 
Thanks for the clarification, I corrected it.
Frans S (2021-10-10 10:07:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112302074
muchichka_s (2021-10-09 13:57:36+00:00): Typo: after https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73383126
zorglubu (2021-10-09 21:24:21+00:00): Bonjour,
et bienvenue dans la communauté OpenStreetMap !
Merci pour vos contributions.

Bonne continuation !
Frans S (2021-10-10 10:06:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 

See my comments on another changesets.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112303441
Frans S (2021-10-11 14:32:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
square the buildings you map

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112303542
svance92 (2021-11-11 20:21:29+00:00): The Fall Creek Greenway is explicitly a cycle trail as designated by Indy Parks.
imamapperguy (2021-11-18 15:33:16+00:00): I do not see where I have marked the Greenway itself as not a cycle trail. I marked instances of the walking path from a parking lot TO the trail as such.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
WerKater (2021-10-09 14:41:06+00:00): Fortsetzung meines Kommentars:

... wie das geht). Auch über das westliche Ende will z.B. BRouter absolut nicht drüberrouten, also vermute ich, dass das auch irgendwie falsch ist.
archie (2021-10-09 15:22:02+00:00): What is your source for tagging this as industrial (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991479061)?
D5221 (2021-10-10 13:07:48+00:00): That was a mistake. I have changed the area to farmyard.
woodpeck (2021-10-11 21:16:02+00:00): Dear jmontane, based on which information did you "fix" this down name? The town calls itself, on its own web site, "Maó - Mahón".
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work