piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-09-03 22:17:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-09-03 22:28:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
HazardMapper (2018-09-03 23:33:32+00:00): What did you base the boundaries on for this forest land use in the western and southern areas of Carigara? I'm not as familiar with other areas outside of the Carigara boundaries, but I believe the forest area should extend all the way to the municipal limits in areas where landuse is no longer present.
dmgroom_ct (2018-09-04 11:18:42+00:00): Hi
The boundaries were based on imagery, as such it is not alsways possible to be precise in determining where the actual change occurs between forestry area and a different landuse type.

However I had three intentions with this changeset.

The first was to remove the municipal boundaries from the multipolygon for the forest landuse.  The forest extends across municipal boundaries, and you can see I have now extended it into Capoocan, before this changeset the forset was shown to stop at the Capoocan / Carigara boundary. 

The second intention was to split the foreseted area into at least two multipolygons. Prior to this changeset the multipolygon covered a large area (particularly in a north / south extent), and I felt it was more manageable as two multipolygons.

The third intention was to try and be more precise in the definition of the forest / other landuse boundary.

This was a large edit, with many changes in the changeset.  I closed this changeset with the intention of revising some of the ways in the multipolygon at a later date, in particular I expect that the forested area mapped in OSM will "move" south past the Carigara / Ormoc boundary
HazardMapper (2018-09-11 01:00:25+00:00): Agree with everything you've mentioned. I've actually been meaning to break up that forest areas for some time. Only suggestion (which I'll try to find some time to contribute) would be to ensure that the forest covers all of the western areas of Carigara into Capoocan (notably in near Manloy and Upper Hiraan). I noticed there were some areas that were still removed in the last changeset. Ideally these would obviously continue to extend further into Capoocan.
Andrea Musuruane (2018-09-07 13:07:40+00:00): Ciao, In genere, quando i confini di un luogo sono approssimativi (caso molto frequente, come questo) si inserisce un nodo (tra l'altro già presente) e non un'area con il tag place. Inserire oltre al tag place anche il tag addr:city con il nome del comune di cui la frazione fa parte è errato (lo si ricava dai confini comunali). addr.city è usato solo per gli indirizzi (ovvero quando è presente un numero civico). Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2018-09-07 12:50:32+00:00): Ciao. Il tag name su una highway si riferisce al nome della strada. Il nome del ponte deve essere messo sul tag bridge:name https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name. Ciao, Andrea
clemhoh (2020-08-01 09:36:25+00:00): Hallo,
soweit ich auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype verstehe, ist Grade1 nur für asphaltierte/betonierte Forstwege anzuwenden. Gut geschotterte und verdichtete Waldwege sind dagegen Grade2 (alles ab surface=compacted). Für mich persönlich ist das auch ein wichtiger Unterschied, wenn ich Rennradtouren plane. Als ich das letzte Mal im Sommer den Hirschenstander Pass bergab nach Wildenthal gefahren war, ist der Weg nicht asphaltiert gewesen. Daher wäre aus meiner Sicht Grade2 richtig. Die Breite eines Waldwegs spielt für den Tracktype dagegen keine Rolle.
Viele Grüße, Clemens
tornado0910 (2018-09-03 23:48:34+00:00): Please revert this, my bad!
tornado0910 (2018-09-03 23:48:49+00:00): Please revert this my bad!!
ElliottPlack (2018-11-24 18:48:34+00:00): What river misuse?
tornado0910 (2018-09-03 23:46:57+00:00): Please revert this, my bad!
tornado0910 (2018-09-03 23:48:08+00:00): Please revert this, my bad!!
tornado0910 (2018-09-04 00:04:37+00:00): Please revert!
Glassman (2018-09-04 05:05:09+00:00): You didn't need to delete the entire sidewalk, just show it ending at the fence.
kartonage (2018-09-04 04:34:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 62264872 due to semi-mechanical edits of names and overall poor quality of extensive changes. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62264872)
viloan (2018-09-04 00:29:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
felipeeugenio (2018-12-04 19:03:31+00:00): Estimado. El tag building es para estructuras, no para recintos. saludos
oba510 (2018-09-04 04:00:35+00:00): This is obviously not a 1-story building - see https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/jje8RFHY_DogqyaWrwTWjA
manings (2018-09-20 14:12:38+00:00): This building import has a few issues:
1. nodes have building=yes tag.
2. map symbol from imported data was also included as a feature (ie. cross icon for hospitals, triangle flag for schools).
3. some building do not look like it exist on the ground.

One changeset I sas partially fixed this. https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62462400/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62262168
jfrias92 (2018-09-05 09:30:05+00:00): OSM es una herramienta colaborativa utilizado por peatones, personas con discapacidad, ciclistas, excursionistas, piragüistas, conductores y muchos otros. Por favor, no añadas cosas que no existan.
Chris Fleming (2018-09-04 08:56:00+00:00): You added it, you deleted it, what is going on?
gseethar (2018-09-05 11:25:07+00:00): The segment was incorrectly added and jojoyal@ was asked to remove it after expert validation of his edit.
Chris Fleming (2018-09-05 12:43:34+00:00): Thanks Ganesh, in general I keep an eye on edits in Scotland and especially Edinburgh - I've seen a lot of service roads added that have been added now getting removed around Scotland. Ideally I would like to understand a bit more about how they were identified to be added and what sources were used, and where mistakes have been made(we've all done it) how they are being identified and remvoed. Then I can move the Amazon Logistics mappers to my trusted list and not worry about what they're doing.
gseethar (2018-09-05 13:11:48+00:00): Hi Chris, We use driver activity as a source to identify missing roads. Once a potential missing road has been identified we use OSM resources to confirm if a road exists. We make an edit only if there is proof available. 
However in some cases the editors misinterpret the evidence. We ensure that edits are validated by an expert by capturing and checking the change sets made by the editor. If the expert finds a mistake then the editor is asked to make corrections( eg. deleting unwanted segments). An edit is considered a mistake if the sources in OSM do not have any proof to backup the edit. We never assume.

Hope this helps. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.
Chris Fleming (2018-09-10 20:21:28+00:00): Thanks great to know - so these are cases where their probably are service roads going around the building (from imagery) but if you don't have drivers traces to verify this with then you won't add the roads, thank you for yhe detailed response.
flohoff (2018-09-04 09:49:47+00:00): Hi Nightdive,
du hast hier einen neuen Fußweg eingetragen. Ist der wirklich nicht für Radfahrer erlaubt?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622503925

Wäre ja schade das die deshalb aus dem Bike routing fallen weil wir die tags vergessen.

Flo
Lipperlandexpress (2018-09-04 10:28:48+00:00): Ich habe dort keinen Fußweg eingetragen sondern das war mein Nachbar hier vor einigen Jahren.
Ich habe nur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30541424/history  gesplittet und den unteren Teil als path umgetaggt. Beim oberen Teil muss ich nochmals nachschauen und so habe ich es als Fußweg gelassen.
flohoff (2018-09-04 10:50:29+00:00): 
Jau Prima - Mach mal - die anderen Wegteile habe ich mir gar nicht angesehen. Wäre schön wenn das tagging so passt das wenn ich da mit dem Rad durch darf das auch sich im tagging wiederfindet.

Flo
P Withington (2018-09-04 01:24:43+00:00): I've asked for someone to review this because this is my first input and basically I haven't a clue what I'm doing. I'm trying to add a hiking trail to the map.
phidauex (2018-09-04 05:12:11+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing! I've made a few tweaks to your trail, and have some suggestions. First, you may want to read https://learnosm.org/en/ to get more familiar with the mapping tool. You don't want your paths to double back on each other - they should indicate where the path is, not all the steps you would take if you walked it (IE, you don't need the path to go out and back).

You also need to connect your path to other ways to show that you can move from one to another.

And finally, "tags" are how OSM tells mapping tools what something is. Instead of naming something "path" with name=path, use the preset tool on the left side of the iD editor to search for "path", when you click the preset, it will fill in some tags for you, and give you suggestions for additional information. In this case "highway=path" is how you tell people it is a walking path. You can specify with the other suggested tags if bicycles are allowed, the surface, or the name (if it has one).

Hope that helps, and keep mapping!
P Withington (2018-09-05 01:16:03+00:00): Thank you for you help phidauex. I'll review the learnosm to gain more insight into the process and try to do better next time! Cheers, Paul
phidauex (2018-09-05 05:35:51+00:00): Hope it helps, I know it seems like a lot to learn at first, but you'll get it. Thanks for actually going out and mapping new things by GPS, much more interesting than just armchair mapping!
Almtesh (2018-09-04 06:40:01+00:00): Je ne comprend pas cette modification, l'adresse ne se met pas dans les attributs contact:*, mais dans les attributs addr:*.
En plus, tu as supprimé l'attribut contact:website qui n'était que mal formaté.
J'ai corrigé ça en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62267244.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2018-09-04 07:50:50+00:00): Bonjour, 
merci pour la modification, c'est une erreur de ma part
Cordialement
konkala1 (2018-09-04 04:03:05+00:00): test
ardhavara (2018-09-04 04:05:19+00:00): test
bkil (2018-10-08 18:06:41+00:00): Hello, I see you are also tagging fire hydrant opening direction. I made up fire_hydrant:opening=* with a friend without prior RFC. I've started a public thread about this so others can suggest improvements to this tagging practice. Feel free to join the discussion:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-October/039707.html
ardhavara (2018-09-04 04:03:48+00:00): test
PHerison (2018-11-01 08:37:29+00:00): While checking keepRight.at I stumbled over you "artistic" contributions to OSM.  
OSM is a serious project and not for "painting". Please remove!
freebeer (2018-11-01 12:10:09+00:00): This is not the only edit that has added rubbish for the Pokeymon.

Look across the street.  And to the south.  And next door.  And to the northeast.  I mean, public footpaths all over a tennis court?  Monstrous overlapping buildings?  An envelope-shaped Postamt?

The whole area needs to be purged of this vandalism.  By any means necessary.
Hoolen (2018-09-05 20:57:43+00:00): Please be careful next time and avoid changeset over the whole world.
MarioXXX (2018-09-04 03:35:20+00:00): *lane divider
viloan (2018-09-04 03:46:43+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2018-09-08 16:46:15+00:00): Hi, the 'hmv' tag is new and undocumented. What does it mean?
Thanks
yaswap (2019-07-09 13:32:08+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Here tha tag should be HGV not HMV. Its a mistake from ourside. I have changed it to HGV=no. 

Thanks for the review again.

(on behalf of anurasi)
pitscheplatsch (2018-09-05 11:40:09+00:00): #test #failed ?
SupriyaDutta (2018-09-05 12:04:42+00:00): There was a mistake with the csv file. I have checked  and corrected those points.
pitscheplatsch (2018-09-05 11:40:18+00:00): #test #failed ?
PlaneMad (2018-09-07 17:05:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit. It look like you incorrectly marked the city of Thane as a building. 

Have fixed it now :) please take a look at https://learnosm.org/en/ to better understand how to map features correctly.
Glassman (2019-07-13 02:09:44+00:00): I noticed you added a bus stop on a service road on the bothell uw campus. There was already one along side of the road. It's my understanding bus stops should not be on the road. it gtfs:stop_id = 76305
mueschel (2018-09-10 08:35:08+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "Boucher=Yes", this is new and not used anywhere else. What does it mean?

Jan
wegspotter (2018-11-14 10:54:02+00:00): Hier ben ik begin november 2018 nog doorgegaan. Er staat een naambord Nerenbospad én aan het kruispunt met de Bosstraat verduidelijking over de toegankelijkheid. Zowel voetgangers als fietsers mogen deze weg gebruiken. Tags overeenkomstig aangepast.
wegspotter (2018-11-14 11:03:51+00:00): Ook Luisdonkbospad is met naambord en toegankelijkheidsregeling aangeduid ter hoogte van de Bosstraat. Strava toont veel passage.
erikp (2018-09-04 10:13:36+00:00): Danke
Rich1234 (2018-09-04 10:24:39+00:00): Is there a reason why you removed the tag service=parking_aisle from the ways in this changeset that run along the rows of parking spaces?

According to the wiki (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle) the ways that run along the rows of parking spaces in a parking lot should be tagged as service=parking_aisle.
jojoyal (2019-07-11 10:15:13+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Thanks for the updates. We will follow the suggestion going forward while editing parking aisles.

Regards,
jojoyal.
abakus_uploader (2018-09-04 22:30:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
lakedistrict (2018-09-04 18:15:24+00:00): Thanks for all your edits in Reading! Hopefully we'll get clearer imagery to use at some point or someone with will survey and fix them. If you want to be more specific, there is a House tag (search House in the editor). Hope to see more edits from you soon! :).
lakedistrict (2018-09-04 18:16:20+00:00): *or someone will survey and fix them
muzirian (2021-09-22 13:03:18+00:00): there is no, proper road crossing the railway, fixing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/62267607
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-09-23 00:55:31+00:00): thanks mate..
habi (2018-09-04 09:13:07+00:00): That worked nicely: https://imgur.com/gallery/KA4LdYT
Olé
muralito (2018-09-04 12:48:00+00:00): Yes, it is now according to the wiki, equivalent to other complexes such as university campuses.
freebeer (2018-09-06 17:32:27+00:00): hallo stadiaarcadia,
I just got around to reading your private message to me about this area.
I am taking the liberty to reply in public, so this is visible to others who can contribute and correct me as needed.  I prefer keeping useful info as public as possible.
.
The problem you described here has been taken care of by muralito in what appears to be a wide-ranging changeset.
.
What you want/need to learn, is the concept of a multipolygon, with an outer member, and an inner ring.
That will allow you to punch holes in buildings like here, or to cut out the inner part of an athletics track, for example.
.
I think that is what you want to know, and also may help you with the one note somewhere in the US - Atlanta maybe? - that I marked as resolved without analysing the aerial imageries.
.
If you need further explanation, a followup here is probably as good as any - I read Notes and changeset comments far more than I bother with non-public messages.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-06 19:34:42+00:00): Yes, that is the thing I can't figure out how I can fix it, those inner rings. How can I "cut out" a part of the building for example, so that the football pitch and the building don't overlap? Here I have the same problem for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62353609 If  I know how I can fix this, I'm going to fix it ofcourse :) I've tried to find it on Wiki OSM, but I couldn't figure it out.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-06 19:39:33+00:00): I don't really get the concept of a multipolygon. I've read something about out, but I didn't fully understand (sorry, English is not my first language).
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-06 19:58:30+00:00): A sports field tag and a stadium tag should overlap, a sports field tag and a building tag shouldn't overlap, that's how it works right?
freebeer (2018-09-07 07:47:40+00:00): i know your default editor, iD, has problems managing some types of relations (try searching that), but i am unclear if the multipolygon is one of them.
.
there is a very active dutch forum available; you may be able to get the best advice for you there in what i assume your Muttersprache, from mappers who may miss your questions on the mailing lists.  otherwise the site help.osm that was suggested earlier may be helpful, though personally i have not found it worth bookmarking.
.
i am afraid with the editor i use, i cannot give advice on how to create a multipolygon that you would find useful.  and again, i can"t say anything about josm and if work there is easier.
.
a sports field can be overlapped by a building, but strictly, it would be overlapped by a roof, or a level=1-or-greater building part.  however the details are part of advanced mapping far beyond what i have bothered with.  if the arena is entirely enclosed, then it is legit to have no more than the building outline.
.
the duke university field you left a bug-report at is a good example of where - were the track to still be intact - the upper level of stands would overlap the original track, so those stands would be useless for following the activity on the track directly below, but not for the presumably better-attended footie skirmishes.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-07 08:06:40+00:00): Thank you for the information freebeer.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-12 07:09:21+00:00): I've added a multipolygon, because the field was not visible because of stadium tag overlapping. Can anyone please confirm if the multipolygon was added the right way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62510357
ika-chan! (2018-09-08 09:41:12+00:00): Hi, at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Greece I believe that the current consensus is that the road numbers are tagged under "ref" and not "nat_ref". It is worth noting that we do not tag just for the renderer. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
StephaneP (2018-09-06 07:51:49+00:00): Bonjour Milouse,
J'ai fait des corrections sur tes modifications :
- Les rues ne peuvent pas être des rues résidentielles
- J'ai supprimé les parking_entrance qui sont réservés aux parkings souterrains ou à plusieurs niveaux (oui, c'est un peu bizarre, mais c'est comme ça)
- J'ai corrigé les 2 voies d'accès au giratoire. Tu les avais passées en voies de service, mais pour que ça soit cohérent avec tes autres modifications elles auraient dû être en voie residentielles.
- J'ai corrigé certaines voies de parking.

Si tu as des questions, n'hésite pas, via les commentaires de changeset, ou via la messagerie.

Stéphane
milouse (2018-09-08 13:11:26+00:00): Bonjour,

Pas de problème bien au contraire. J'ai effectivement galéré à trouver les meilleurs types de voies. Je vais regarder tout ça en détail pour mieux choisir une prochaine fois.

Bonne fin de week-end,

Étienne
StephaneP (2018-09-12 09:55:41+00:00): Ca marche !