piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
micahcochran (2017-03-30 17:34:21+00:00): Hello Kpburns,  

I believe that Trinity Park is the old name for Lincoln-Bridgeforth Park.  There may very well be a marker that says Trinity Park.  The Judge R Eugene Pincham Athletic Field is being leased by the City of Athens, but I assume that it could/should be a part of Lincoln-Bridgeforth Park.   The "Trinity Park" boundary that you have made includes area owned by private property owners.

Refer to the Athens Public Works Map
http://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=a5575fed098b4dccbeffce54189ed94d

I'll happily give you GIS data for this.  There is a layer in the map of "Athens Parks & Cemeteries".  That boundary does not include the Athletic Field.  
How do you want to address this?


Thank you,
Micah
Kpburns (2017-04-02 18:57:52+00:00): It should be corrected now and the park is now more fleshed out with it's features.  Should the tag read both the old and new names?
Thank you 
Kyndra
(also just realized I have been replying to these through email and it is no reply.  So you haven't been seeing anything that I have been sending back.)
cadsauxk (2017-04-28 22:06:17+00:00): Olá Felipe Meira, 

legal essas suas contribuições off-road :) 

Mas por favor, atente à algumas regras de mapeamento: no campo "nome" deve vir somente nome próprio (tipo Rua Duque de Caxias, Rodovia fernão Dias). Coisas como "4x4" não devem ser colocados neste campo. Para indicar que uma via deve ser percorrida com veículo tracionado coloque 4wd_only=yes. 

Use o campo velocidade máxima (maxspeed) apenas quando há placas regulamentando a velocidade máxima da via.

Quando se trata de estradas de terra adicione também informações como surface=unpaved ou surface=ground, já que na falta deste o sistema assume surface=paved.

um grande abraço
cadsauxk (2017-04-28 22:39:43+00:00): Outra dica, pequenos trechos de acesso a fazendas podem ser colocados como highway=service junto com surface=unpaved.
Commodoortje (2017-03-09 00:31:25+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-03-09 00:35:07+00:00): Een stukje gras met bomen valt nog niet onder de classificatie park.
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park
Ik heb daarom je edit aangepast.
Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve.
﻿OpenStreetMap is een samenwerkingsproject, en we moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
bhousel (2017-03-09 05:58:26+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Kevin Kofler (2017-03-09 01:55:37+00:00): Der Helmut-Zilk-Park ist ja eh schon als Park getaggt, siehe die Fläche 152333976. Da es sich offensichtlich um einen Irrtum handelt, habe ich mir erlaubt, diesen Änderungssatz zurückzusetzen, siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46696748
neuhausr (2017-04-13 17:54:00+00:00): Is that a pool? Try leisure=swimming_pool instead :)
mueschel (2017-03-20 09:38:58+00:00): Partially reverted. Reason: features do not exist.
bhousel (2017-03-09 02:21:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 02:24:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Spanholz (2017-03-09 10:52:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM, thanks for your edits! I changed your added footways a bit to match them with the OSM standard. Maybe have a look at my changes. 

Only footways connected to streets will be used by routing engines. Else they are seen as little islands...

Have fun mapping!
Yonaimy (2017-03-09 15:01:21+00:00): Thank you very much for the info :)
Gianfranco2014 (2020-06-24 16:00:26+00:00): Non capisco questo sentiero, parte dal nulla e arriva nel nulla, è attaccato ai landuse, che ti prego non farlo, perchè se si modificano i landuse, si sposta anche il sentiero. e il nome cornedo cosa c'entra. ma sei sicuro che ci sia quel sentiero li, dalle foto aeree, non si vede nulla.
bhousel (2017-03-09 02:37:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  

I mapped the tables and grill too. :)
SergioTraverssi (2017-03-09 00:44:16+00:00): "Wrong use of 'Cuenca' deleted" should be on the description.
nammala (2017-03-09 06:53:57+00:00): Hi oizumi,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. make sure you don't add test data to the map. Please add valuable data since OSM is the real map of the world.

Regards,
nammala
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:56:43+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:57:33+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:58:35+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
0000FF berries (2017-03-09 22:23:07+00:00): Please improve the map by adding things that exist. https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tips-pokemon-go/
bhousel (2017-03-09 02:56:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 02:58:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 02:52:55+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
mweper (2017-03-09 12:59:59+00:00): Hola Osvaldo. Trata de añadir los nombres sólo con la primer letra en mayusculas y siguiendo esta normalización en la wiki. [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres]
bhousel (2017-03-09 02:49:43+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:03:37+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:02:03+00:00): Please do not add features to OpenStreetMap that do not exist in the real world, thank you!
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-15 06:41:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48691589 where the changeset comment is: Revert 'Zowie Polie' edits after fictional edits continued in spite of having asked them to stop
GerdP (2017-10-11 07:11:16+00:00): Hi! 
I've reverted this changeset because it is of no use for OSM and looks like an undiscussed import. See
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52813536
GerdP (2017-10-11 08:10:43+00:00): Hi!
This looks like an import to me. Unfortunately the data is not useful for OSM
because you did not tag the nodes or connect them with ways. What was the source for these nodes?
Did you follow http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
GerdP (2017-10-11 08:12:00+00:00): Hi!
This looks like an import to me. Unfortunately the data is not useful for OSM because you did not tag the nodes or connect them with ways. What was the source for these nodes? Did you follow http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:00:48+00:00): Please do not add features to OpenStreetMap that do not exist in the real world, thank you!
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-15 06:42:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48691589 where the changeset comment is: Revert 'Zowie Polie' edits after fictional edits continued in spite of having asked them to stop
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-20 04:10:35+00:00): You made a change to a 69 kV line, but you did not indicated the changes on SM City Batangas and the Parish of the Most Holy Trinity.
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:17:25+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 05:49:01+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:17:54+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:18:32+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Mapeiro (2017-03-09 09:45:53+00:00): Olá,

Bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap.

O que você fez na região da UFPE está errrado.

amenity=public_building não é mais usado (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=public_building) e além disso isso não se aplica a uma área grande, mais sim para edificações ou prédios específicos.

A atividade de pesquisa e escritórios em geral está enquadrada pelo landuse=commercial (não confundir com landuse=retail, que é para lojas).

Você mudou a área do Centro de Tecnologias Estratégicas do Nordeste de landuse=commercial (área comercial, de escritórios etc) para amenity=parking (estacionamento). Isso não faz sentido, está errado.

Por favor corrija essas edições.
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:27:46+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:29:34+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:36:35+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Spanholz (2017-03-09 11:07:09+00:00): That's not a park, I deleted this. Please do not add imaginery stuff to OSM to cheat with Pokemon Go...
adrianojbr (2017-03-09 21:17:12+00:00): jimmi, qual o objetivo desse teste?
adrianojbr (2017-03-19 13:58:18+00:00): jimmi, já podemos desfazer esse mapeamento para teste?
adrianojbr (2017-03-25 14:31:38+00:00): edição removida.
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:59:02+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 03:40:58+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
kartler175 (2017-05-13 12:40:22+00:00): Please rework uploaded data to integrate properly:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-77.24299&lat=45.90652&zoom=13&opacity=1.00
Martini097 (2017-03-09 04:11:29+00:00): you've added the tag building=yes to some large areas of land that are also tagged landuse=commercial. the normal convention is to only place the tag building=yes on specific/individual buildings and not large areas. the tagging of landuse=commercial is enough to let people know that there will be buildings in the area until such time that someone is prepared to map the individual buildings
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
Lee Drury (2017-03-10 01:11:52+00:00): Right, so if an area already has building=yes  and it is a commercial property I would also tag as landuse=commercial?

And if there is an area that is a known as  landuse=commercial but lacks individually tagged buildings, I can designate the whole areas as landuse=commercial?
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-11 08:36:25+00:00): I've tweaked how http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435898495 is modelled - tracing the individual buildings inside of it.

It can be a little tricky with the ID editor making some assumptions about something being a building, when you are tracing the whole area.
Spanholz (2017-03-09 10:47:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM, are you sure this is a park and not just a piece of grass? It's quite small.
bhousel (2017-03-09 05:41:24+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 05:42:47+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Supaplex (2017-03-09 16:03:22+00:00): 請用highway=elevator
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Delevator
chihchun (2017-03-09 16:06:14+00:00): 您好，請參照以下文件正確編輯電梯

* Tag:highway=elevator - OpenStreetMap Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Delevator
* Proposed features/lifts - OpenStreetMap Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/lifts
* Simple Indoor Tagging - OpenStreetMap Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging#Modelling_connections_between_different_levels

如不願意修正，將回退本次修改。
nikhil5 (2019-03-01 03:46:32+00:00): "Hi   Aulia Ishmata,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 479414631 classified as 'Track'.However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,the area seems to be residential and this should be marked as residential road.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
shaikh solaiman (2019-02-13 05:14:15+00:00): Dear moonlighta10 thanks for your contribution on OSM. Your contribution makes changes on map, but still there are many missing buildings that should have drawn as well as your building shapes are not good. Remember most of the buildings are square or rectangular in shape which I have not found in your job. However I will fix that issues. So, try to avoid this type of mistakes. Thanks again.
dgitto (2017-03-09 05:05:19+00:00): is not in use as place of worship
lleung (2017-05-14 04:37:43+00:00): Your change set removed a building -- you must see garden from satellite map and believe it's on the ground -- actually the garden is on the roof of the building!
Mapeiro (2017-03-09 09:54:17+00:00): Olá novamente,

Você uniu alguns pontos do polígono do "Parque Dr. Arnaldo Assunção" às ruas do entorno. O correto é que tais polígonos não sejam unidos às linhas das ruas mas fiquem limitados à calçada, onde acaba de fato o parque. Afinal, a linha de uma rua passa pelo centro da pista e o parque não vai até o meio da rua.

Clicando em um ponto aparecem várias opções, uma delas serve para "desgrudar"/desunir pontos de objetos diferentes (no caso, desgrudar um ponto da rua de um ponto do parque).
bhousel (2017-03-09 05:45:07+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 05:44:00+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
bhousel (2017-03-09 05:45:50+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Bernhard W (2017-12-08 17:45:23+00:00): Warum hast du tags geändert oder gelöscht? Beispielsweise beim Kirchengebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172823461
BeKri (2017-12-09 18:23:55+00:00): Servus Bernhard,
weil ich sie für falsch halte.
Bei der Kirche:
Ist keine Kirche mehr, die "Kirche" findet im Moment ja wohl im Bauwagen statt.
http://www.sse-maria-magdalena.de/html/content/franklin610.html
Die Washington Street gibt es wohl nicht mehr, der HausNAME als addr:* tag ist kaum 698, das war ja wohl die interne Bezeichnung der Amis und gehört wohl eher nach ref oder weg, weil die Amis sind ja auch weg.
Gruss derBeKri
Bernhard W (2017-12-10 12:55:31+00:00): Hallo BeKri,
das sehe ich ganz anders:
building beschreibt den Gebäudetyp, nicht die Nutzung. Der Gebäudetyp ist immer noch "church".
city und postcode sind immer noch gleich.
Der Straßenname wurde geändert von "Washington Street" in "George-Washington-Straße".
Aus meiner Sicht begründet dies alles nicht die Löschung der Daten.
Soweit ich weiß, steht "698" immer noch groß auf dem Gebäude. Welchen key man dafür benzutzt, ist nicht klar definiert. Aber einfach löschen finde ich nicht okay.
Gruß Bernhard
BeKri (2017-12-10 15:24:12+00:00): Servus Bernhard,
"Soweit ich weiß, steht "698" immer noch groß auf dem Gebäude" .... da würde ich mich aber bei den Amis beschweren, dass sie das beim Auszug vor 5 Jahren nicht überpinselt haben.
Und Du bist sicher, dass das nach dem Umbau so bleibt ? Im Moment scheint das Gebäude weder building noch church sondern eher construction zu sein und die Hausnummer wird zwischen 35 und 49 sicher NICHT bei 698 bleiben oder ??? Bleibt überhaupt der name=BFV Chapel ? Wohl kaum ...
Ich denke es besteht nach dem Umbau die Chance es einfach richtig einzutragen und gut ist.
Gruß der BeKri
BeKri (2017-12-10 15:31:56+00:00): Nachtrag:
Nix für Ungut Bernhard,
aber wahrscheinlich möchtest Du, dass ich im Waldgrubenweg auch die HalbAdressen auf den Garagen nachtrage oder ?
Die werden zwar nie richtige Adressen mit Hausnummern,
aber löschen ist GANZ böse ...
Lg derBeKri
Bernhard W (2017-12-10 16:48:06+00:00): Das Gebäude soll nach aktueller Planung nach der Renovierung wieder als Kirche genutzt werden. Der Name ist nicht Teil dieses Changesets, aber unter diesem Namen ist das Gebäude in der Umgebung noch bekannt.
Die Adressen an einem von 10 Garagengebäuden war vermutlich ein copy/paste-Fehler beim Eintragen der Adressdaten (Gebäude versehentlich mit-markiert). Die lösche ich gleich wieder.
In Mannheim wurden für manche Garagen Hausnummern vergeben.
Gruß Bernhard
bhousel (2017-03-09 05:47:21+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
mxrev8 (2017-04-03 10:30:43+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
bhousel (2017-03-09 05:47:51+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-09 11:49:39+00:00): Ah nice work! For the buildings, try the 'S' shortcut key to square them.

Keep up the mapping!
bhousel (2017-03-09 05:48:34+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Stadtigel (2017-03-10 14:41:27+00:00): Hallo Escand! 
Es wäre prima, wenn du zu deinen Änderungen einen kurzen Kommentar eintragen würdest, damit man leichter nachvollziehen kann, was du alles konkret geändert bzw. ergänzt hast.
Herzliche Grüße sendet Bert
bhousel (2017-03-09 15:22:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
rene78 (2019-07-02 22:58:18+00:00): Ist hier das Büro?
volker g (2019-07-03 06:18:40+00:00): Hallo rene 78, ich hatte eine falsche Inf., habe es gelöscht. Danke, Gruß Volker
neemnatakawah (2017-03-09 06:03:29+00:00): Turns out this is called a "culvert," I modified it in the next edit.
mavl (2019-01-02 16:38:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2019-10-10 06:30:13+00:00): Hi,
I need to delete your massive small buildings since it doesn't represent the actual object on the imagery.
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
Gazer75 (2017-03-18 12:48:16+00:00): Vinstra is not a city. A town at best. Cities in are normally 100k people. In Norway this is 50k with exceptions of Tromsø, Bodø, Kristiansand.
Please do not mistake the city status some places have given themselves after 1996 as the same. Places with less than 1000 people have city status.
manoharuss (2017-03-09 12:04:00+00:00): Hi lorandr_telenav,

Observed that this changeset bbox is huge. May I suggest keeping the changeset size to a smaller area by uploading often.

Thanks.



Best,

Manohar
mueschel (2017-03-10 09:19:29+00:00): Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
nevw (2017-03-09 08:58:24+00:00): Your spam and inappropriate tags on Plenty Road have been deleted.
If you want to add business details add all the tags to the building it occupies (not the road) and leave out the spam.
nevw (2017-03-10 00:47:04+00:00): I have added all the company tags to the correct address point. I did not add to building as it appears several companies occupy the same building.
Hjart (2017-03-09 10:24:20+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Bemærk dog at det generelt er bedre at rette de eksisterende objekter end at tegne nye identiske ovenpå og at jeg derfor har slettet din version og overført navnet til den første.
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
andrewsh (2017-12-28 14:49:24+00:00): Hi Maťo,

What is the source for the park name? I was unable to find any evidence it is in fact named like that during the survey on the location.

Thanks!
*Martin* (2017-12-29 13:29:49+00:00): It is a Pokemon Go virtual park ;-).

Please revert.
MatoKesan (2017-12-29 13:48:00+00:00): It is not a virtual park, all the changes I described where made, I live here. My motivation to map these changes where Pokémon Go but that doesn't mean I put in something that doesn't exist. 
Only the name of the park area has no source it isn't named yet it was my own naming because the building owner that own these area named the building Central Park. 
Also there was a small children playground house added about three months ago which I still didn't map.
*Martin* (2017-12-29 17:17:15+00:00): OK, thanks for the explanation :-).
andrewsh (2017-12-29 18:07:17+00:00): If there's no source for the park name, I will have to remove it, at least until it is officially confirmed (or not).
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mueschel (2017-03-10 09:22:06+00:00): Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
freeExec (2017-03-09 10:06:04+00:00): Почитайте документацию, чего вы обозначаете https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity=taxi
laznik (2017-03-09 10:36:39+00:00): dobry den, to jazierko sa naozaj vola "Súkromné jazierko"? Na oznacenie faktu ze objekt je sukromny mame v OSM tagy. Do nazvu tato informacia nepatri.
andrewsh (2017-12-29 18:14:06+00:00): Nepatrí. Mažem.
j03lar50n (2017-03-09 19:22:01+00:00): Hello, your edit was reverted by another member of the local SLO OpenStreetMap community. The flooding may be a temporary situation, but it's not a permanent feature and not an appropriate addition. Please let us know if you have any questions -  we're glad to help!
mueschel (2017-03-10 09:19:45+00:00): Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
mueschel (2017-03-10 09:20:17+00:00): Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
mueschel (2017-03-10 09:21:26+00:00): Hi,
You uploaded many buildings with tags like 'material classified as' in various spelling versions - please do not invent new tags, but use only those defined in the wiki. Otherwise they are not usable at all!

Jan
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
geoaria (2017-03-09 10:57:48+00:00): جناب m_noruz  لطفا نقشه را ویرایش نکنید تمام نقشه اصفهان را بهم ریخته اید
geoaria (2017-03-09 11:04:41+00:00): لطفا قبل از ویرایش نقشه به آموزش های وبلاک 

http://ir-osm.mihanblog.com/

و کانال تلگرام : 
https://t.me/osmiran

مراجعه کنید. خرابکاری های شما زحمت مضاعف برای دیگران درست می کند