piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Yunkers (2021-11-19 18:38:35+00:00): Nie przeczytałeś artykułu zbyt dokładnie. Jest jasno napisane, że kategorię sejmik zmienił w lutym, ale nie nadał numeru. W podanej przez Ciebie uchwale numerów też nie widzę. DW bez numeru nie są niczym dziwnym, to norma przy zmianach kategorii.
szalona_entropia (2021-11-19 20:49:33+00:00): Zdarza się również, że numery są nadawane w jakichś wewnętrznych ustaleniach między GDDKiA i ZDW i pojawiają się w oznakowaniu zanim zostanie opublikowane stosowne zarządzenie GDDKiA lub uchwała sejmiku. Jest to zresztą wprost napisane w artykule: "Marszałek dostał informację o zmianach numerów z Generalnej Dyrekcji Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad na początku kwietnia tego roku. ". Potwierdza to zdjęcie, które przywołałem.
Yunkers (2021-11-20 15:02:08+00:00): Czyli mamy oznakowanie na części wyremontowanej Kujawskiej/Bernadyńskiej (wiemy o jednym skrzyżowaniu, ale załóżmy optymistycznie, że gdzieś jeszcze ten numer się pojawia), informację, że jest jakieś postanowienie i nieoficjalne doniesienia jaka droga ma przebiegać. Wiem, że pewnie w styczniu uchwała się pojawi, ale czy to na pewno ok trzymać przez conajmniej półtorej miesiąca coś czego nie da się zweryfikować? Być może krakowskim targiem zostawić ref na Kujawskiej, a dać unsigned_ref na reszcie trasy?
Yunkers (2021-11-20 15:04:26+00:00): (nieważne, widzę, że jest wycofane)
szalona_entropia (2021-11-20 16:50:13+00:00): Jak zmieniałeś przedwcześnie numeracje dróg w Chrzanowie to nie miałeś wątpliwości, to czemu nagle w Bydgoszczy masz? Bo według mnie zmiana w Bydgoszczy ma większe uzasadnienie niż przedwczesna zmiana DW781 w Chrzanowie.
Yunkers (2021-11-21 21:32:25+00:00): A co ma piernik do wiatraka? Nawet jeśli w Chrzanowie się faktycznie pospieszyłem to nic nie zmienia w Bydgoszczy.
BCNorwich (2021-08-07 06:47:42+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Your edit only added an untagged way on top of part of an existing highway. Thus it adds nothing to the OSM database, the line bearing no description is ignored. I've reverted the changeset.

I don't know exactly what problem you have but there seems to be nothing wrong with OSM data here. I take it that MRS is a routing app, perhaps there is some deficiency with the app. Could you explain more about the problem? Maybe I can help.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-08-12 08:00:10+00:00): Hello, I just now figured out what the problem is and have removed a flood gate from the highway, (which barred all routing). Then I saw your two notes. Had you responded here I could have fixed it earlier. 

When MRA updates the data from OSM the route should work correctly, might be a few days though.

I now have to find out how to correctly map the flood gate.

Regards Bernard.
emvee (2021-09-14 20:55:40+00:00): Hoi Kurt/Kristel

In deze changeset heb je/hebben jullie bicycle=no/foot=no aan  de R16 toegevoegd.

Ik vraag me af of dat correct is, vele van deze wegen hebben cycleway:right=lane en op bijv. het kruispunt met de Antwerpseweg is duidelijke fietsinfrastructuur aanwezig.

bicycle=no betekend dat het wettelijk niet in toegestaan er te fietsen, is dat het geval of is het een geval van (bijna) niemand gaat hier fietsen omdat het te gevaarlijk is.

Groeten,

Martin.
KurtEnKristel (2021-09-15 06:01:40+00:00): Hoi,
Dit moet inderdaad use_sidepath zijn. Ik heb de volledige R16 gecorrigeerd.
Gr.
Kurt
emvee (2021-09-15 06:42:50+00:00): Hoi Kurt,

Bedankt, ook bicycle=* weggehaald waar er cycleway=lane werd gebruikt, goed.

Nog een klein overgebleven probleempje opgelost:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111226637

Groeten,

Martin.
eggie (2021-08-06 19:37:43+00:00): Paul.. Wanneer het een smal pad is dat taggen we highway=path

access=no is bijna altijd fout.
Maak geen combinaties met foot=yes.
Dus beter access=no verwijderen en het stuk omtaggen naar highway=path
eggie
eggie (2021-08-06 19:52:06+00:00): access=no verwijderd..  
highway=path was oke.
Paul Lubbers (2021-08-09 11:26:55+00:00): OK
Badojo (2021-08-06 19:30:17+00:00): Tip: for filled areas add tags highway-pederstrian and area-yes
rickmastfan67 (2021-08-15 19:00:25+00:00): Did you happen to realize you deleted a big chunk of NY-5 (what remains https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73783035 ) when editing the Great Lakes Seaway Trail relation in this changeset?  What should have happened is that you should have split this way instead of removing nodes from it.  I've repaired NY-5 in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109712754
BMACS001 (2021-08-15 19:55:12+00:00): Whoop! My bad. Thanks for cleaning that mess up!
rickmastfan67 (2021-08-16 02:32:12+00:00): NP.   Just randomly looking at the area and zoom in and saw the highway disappear and knew something was up and had to investigate.
Adam Franco (2021-10-14 16:17:32+00:00): I've fixed a missing section of NY-37 west of Massena and some overlapping roads caused by this change-set in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112510817
mueschel (2021-08-12 11:15:41+00:00): Hallo,
schau doch bitte mal nach den Wegen, da haben einige ein merkwürdiges Tag bekommen, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970998555
ottwiz (2021-08-06 19:48:52+00:00): Yeah i know the changeset became bigger, but because of the roundabout, i had to edit the relation of WV 14 and add new members in it.
ottwiz (2021-08-06 19:58:03+00:00): *Williamstown
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
felipeeugenio (2021-08-07 22:26:23+00:00): Alonso, por favoer detener ediciones para cubrir espacio en blanco. Es claro que hay usos distintos al que usas para cubrir. Por favor dejar de mapear para el render.
saludos
habi (2023-01-30 08:54:09+00:00): Ist schon als https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/382382208 erfasst.
habi (2023-01-30 08:56:35+00:00): Ich habe die Verdoppelung in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131869789 aufgelöst.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
eggie (2021-08-07 07:18:56+00:00): Dag Fred... Dit zal nooit routeren, want het Doctor Zamenhofpad staat als highway pedestrian getagd vanaf huisnummer 14.
Wat is de status van dat stukje straat en wat is de klasse van het fietspad?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-07 07:27:07+00:00): Het is vooral in het begin allemaal rijstebrij..  Dit kom nooit routeren. 
Voorlopig heb ik het allemaal routeerbaar gemaakt mbv de laatste luchtfoto quick ortho 2021.
construction = cycleway heb ik  verwijderd. Het fietspad is immers open. 
Dit waren je eigen edits
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109282304

MVG
eggie
Fred Marchee (2021-08-08 06:45:30+00:00): Bedankt voor de aanpassingen.

Het is inderdaad allemaal wat warrig, zeker omdat ik niet heel veel aanpas op OpenStreetMap en je met erg veel voor mij onduidelijke variabelen zit.
Ik nam de variabelen over van een ander stukje fietspad, en dat stukje had blijkbaar ook fouten. (nu niet meer)

Ik zal mij bewerkingen voorlopig taggen met "Ik zou graag hebben dat iemand mijn bewerkingen nakijkt."

Ik zou het niet op mijn geweten willen hebben dat straks iemand de sloot inrijdt door mijn bewerkingen :-)
eggie (2021-08-06 20:33:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Zeker weten dat dit een Indisch restaurant is?
cuisibe=indonesian heb ik verwijderd. 
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
olehz (2021-08-13 15:08:45+00:00): аби наносити тротуари та інший мікромапінг, для початку треба точно дороги нанести. в Стебнику дуже мало GPS-треків, а ви далі їх соваєте, а тепер ще й тротуари. от нафіг воно треба, якщо воно нанесено зі стелі і не відповідатиме дійсності якщо йти з нормальним GPS-приймачем
Shyshka (2021-08-13 16:03:30+00:00): GPS, може, і нема, але тротуари є. І навіть приблизно чому б їх не нанести ?
A67-A67 (2021-08-09 19:30:53+00:00): The correct tag for a busway is highway=busway, not highway=service. I've restored the tagging.
EnumMapper (2021-08-14 10:34:07+00:00): Thanks. In this render we can see the busway: https://maps.tracestrack.com/#19/51.4219/5.4282
literan (2021-08-07 11:55:00+00:00): это не название, а текст с вывески
bolserslon (2021-08-26 14:12:22+00:00): А вот здесь тогда какое название, если это ларек с мороженым?
literan (2021-08-26 14:25:48+00:00): У стандартных ларьков мороженого, прессы в Москве обычно нет названия. Можно выбрать соответствующий пункт в StreetComplete ("Здесь нет знака" или что-то в этом роде), он добавляет тег noname=yes
literan (2021-08-26 14:26:37+00:00): Если интересно, почитайте руководство на эту тему в вики (этот абзац и ниже):

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
bolserslon (2021-08-26 16:54:49+00:00): Ну то есть если бы это был ларек франшизы, например, "Чистая линия", то название было бы "Чистая линия", так? В остальном стало ясно, спасибо. Если бы сразу прислали эту ссылку, было бы гораздо удобнее и приятнее картографировать дальше.
literan (2021-08-26 19:17:54+00:00): да, совершенно верно. Кстати, я где-то видел ларек под таким названием...

Если будут вопросы, обращайтесь, подскажу чем могу
Geim (2021-11-03 21:58:15+00:00): Hoi Josbert,
Waarom heb je covered=yes toegevoegd aan de Ermerweg? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971009860/history
Volgens de wiki is dat juist niet de bedoeling bij viaducten en bruggen. Zie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered#Usage
Josbert Lonnee (2021-11-04 01:08:28+00:00): Nou Geim, pas het aan zou ik zeggen.
DressyPear4 (2021-08-07 10:12:44+00:00): Olá, não remova o nome das vias
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109283962
Hanan Tikveša (2021-08-06 21:42:50+00:00): Hi tadams.
Why did you create this changeset to surround bosnia but not edit anything in bosnia?
you just edited in 2 cities in italy.
GinaroZ (2021-08-06 22:20:21+00:00): Is the gate still there on top of the cattle grid?
I added it based on this and made them two separate nodes
https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/6759596
mountainmonkey (2021-08-08 10:02:34+00:00): Apologies, assumed it was a mistake and gate not visible in air photo - have now restored the gate too.
ottwiz (2021-08-06 22:04:23+00:00): *Wingrove, sorry for the misspelling
Barb 123456789 (2021-08-07 08:28:00+00:00): řecko
*Martin* (2022-08-05 10:25:57+00:00): Budova https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971018325 ma asi zly addr:place="Biela Voda" lebo vsetky budovy naokolo to maju "Čavoj".
yzal (2022-08-07 10:26:45+00:00): Tak je to uvedené aj v katastri https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/14027986?bm=zbgis&pos=48.893989,18.462796,21 ale je pravda, že všetky adresy okolo tam majú časť obce Čavoj a nie Biela Voda. Časť obce Biela Voda je o kúsok vedľa https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/ease/basic/51393801?bm=zbgis&pos=48.891526,18.484793,16
yzal (2022-08-07 10:34:25+00:00): Ale asi to bude len nejaký omyl pracovníka v Čavoji čo zadával dáta do registra adries. Zmenil som addr:place na Čavoj
user_3022894 (2021-08-07 21:23:42+00:00): Hi wielandb,

vielen Dank für deinen Einsatz hier.
Ich habe eine kurze Frage und zwar: Wäre das ok, das surface=tiled auf surface=tiles zu ändern?

Es geht darum, dass tiled "gefliest" und tiles "Fliesen" heißt, und wenn ein Weg asphaltiert ist, dann nutzen wir ja auch z. B. surface=asphalt für "Asphalt" und nicht surface=asphalted für "asphaltiert". Es ist zugegeben eine Kleinigkeit, aber um das Schema nicht zu verwaschen, ist sie trotzdem wichtig.

Ich wollte dir nur Bescheid geben, bevor ich oder jemand anderes es einfach so geändert hätte oder so.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
wielandb (2021-08-09 07:24:04+00:00): Hey,

danke für den Hinweis! Habe ich geändert.

Grüße, Wieland
user_3022894 (2021-08-09 20:11:56+00:00): Hi,
super, sehr gut. Vielen Dank.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Olga | Yanosik (2021-08-18 11:48:22+00:00): Bardzo proszę kończąc remont usuwać wszystkie tagi remontowe - a więc end_date i construction również :)
Dziękuję!
Joel D Reid (2021-08-15 21:58:41+00:00): Hi, Itd5sS6uZ. Please be extra careful with major interchanges. Here, when you added the maxheight tags, it seems you wanted to add it only to each portion of 80 as it is passing under 23. This is [the right approach](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight#How_to_Map); thanks for the new info. When you cut Rte 80 however, it seems you did so by creating new nodes right where 23 and 80 cross—which connects them there. Instead, the ways must pass over/under each other with just a tagged bridge—no intersection node. That way, routing will be forced to use the ramps since, as in real life, there is no single 'intersection'. I un-joined your nodes from 23 and spread them a bit before and after each underpass. Feel free to check them and ensure they still convey your new info correctly. Thanks for mapping!
Itd5sS6uZ (2021-08-15 22:30:37+00:00): Hi Joel, thanks for pointing that out! I saw your edit, which still conveys the information, and the rule is more clear to me now. I'll keep that in mind in the future.
aceman444 (2022-02-05 19:56:45+00:00): Zdravim, nazov bankomatu nie je nazov jeho banky. Tie nazvy su zrejme zbytocne.
Helium314 (2021-08-09 05:06:03+00:00): Hi,
ich bin mir recht sicher dass crossing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1370778085 vor ca 2 Wochen nicht existiert hat und habs deswegen entfernt (war nicht im changeset comment erwähnt, sorry dafür).

Falls du nach Lufbildern gemappt hast würde ich den Übergang wieder entfernen. Falls du vor Ort warst bin ich wohl einfach blind oder hab was verwechselt...
Woazboat (2021-08-09 21:00:48+00:00): Hi, ja du hast recht. Ich war zwar vor kurzem dort (daher auch der neu eingetragene Kreisverkehr), aber den Zebrastreifen hab ich erst im Nachhinein nebenbei auf dem Luftbild gesehen und eingetragen da ich gedacht habe er fehlt. Hab jetzt auch nochmal auf Fotos nachgeschaut die ich dort in der Gegend gemacht hab und den Zebrastreifen gibt es wirklich nicht mehr wie du gesagt hast. Ich hab ihn jetzt wieder entfernt.
ottwiz (2021-08-06 22:02:01+00:00): + added little bit of landcover
habi (2022-12-10 21:53:39+00:00): Ciao
Ist die Baustelle jetzt fertig?
Dann könnte `access=no` auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/787870034/ evtl. wieder entfernt werden.
Gruss,
habi

PS: Ich komme via https://brouter.de/brouter/suspects/Switzerland hierhin...
bresomch (2022-12-11 16:00:09+00:00): Hallo
Diese habe ich völlig vergessen. Danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe die Baustelle raus-genommen. Als ich kürzlich durchfuhr, fehlte noch der Deckbelag der Strasse.
wireguy (2021-08-07 16:40:55+00:00): Hi Kyle, welcome to OSM!   I think Mapbox imagery is clearer in your area.   Also, try and make the building outlines more accurate.   When a building is selected, pressing 'Q' key will square the corners on the building.   They look much neater too!   If you have any questions, just ask. Or if you want there is a Discord and also a Slack with lots of helpful people.
nclm (2021-08-27 11:04:34+00:00): Hi @VLD162, I think your change might have broken Havneholmen, it’s now shown under water, can you fix it back? Thanks!
felipeeugenio (2021-08-07 22:40:49+00:00): esto ya está un poco mejor, gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109289505
DUGA (2022-11-07 03:54:55+00:00): I plan to remove the footway polygon here. Just like highway, they do not need to be in polygon.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13064460#map=18/39.40837/-76.59307
ElliottPlack (2022-11-07 21:15:25+00:00): Hi, you will not remove it! It is ok to have both. One is for routing, one is for visual representing the full ped path plaza.
DUGA (2022-11-07 22:03:03+00:00): Hmm…what about changing to pedestrian area?
mueschel (2021-08-14 13:42:38+00:00): Hi,
please check this node, 'co2' doesn't seem to be a valid fuel type.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8986923455
Violaine_Do (2021-08-09 21:16:53+00:00): Iaorana e Maeva dans OSM à Tahiti, Jean73FR, attention la communauté à quelques bonnes pratiques : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques. Notamment, bien décrire le contenu des changements (là Batiment alors qu'il s'agit d'une édition de routes). Par ailleurs, le wiki est la bible du contributeur : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:highway
Et enfin la communauté locale a clarifié la manière de cartographier les routes : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:French_Polynesia/FR:French_Polynesia_tagging_guidelines#Routes
La route a été corrigée. Bonne continuation!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109289638
rivermont (2021-08-22 02:22:56+00:00): I don't know how or why, but you managed to merge a number of different woods into one relation here, which broke the rendering for all the forests and now there's a large multipolygon that needs fixed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9690268
Violaine_Do (2021-08-09 21:20:30+00:00): Merci pour ta contribution! Par contre, question, tu as mis wheelchair=designated, celà signifie dédié aux fauteuils roulants. En général les ATM sont fait pour tout le monde, avec une accessibilité fauteuil roulant. Si c'est ce cas la, on met plutôt wheelchair=yes. Je te laisse revoir et corriger le cas échéant, donc :) Mauruuru par avance! Voir : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wheelchair#wheelchair.3Ddesignated
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109289937
Glassman (2021-08-08 16:51:16+00:00): #TIP: Instead of deleting the building and address, just remove the business tags. It's likely the building will be reused in the future. It will save someone the trouble of having to redraw the business and add the address.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109290167
Daegalus (2021-08-08 19:43:09+00:00): Ah, thank you. Is there any way to reverse this changeset so  I can redo it properly?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109290167
Glassman (2021-08-08 21:16:46+00:00): I reverted the changeset (the JOSM editor has a revert plugin) and removed the jack in the box tags. Now hopefully a new shop will move in.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109290167
DUGA (2021-09-19 18:02:11+00:00): When the building has multiple purposes, you should not change the type to one of them. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76527621/history#map=19/38.32765/-75.08588
Geogast (2021-08-30 21:05:45+00:00): Você fez muito estrago perto do Carrefour na Marginal Pinheiros. Mapeei a construção "Alto das Nações" ai que mudou muito o estacionamento. Você apagou tudo aquilo. Eu coloquei o tag source=survey no changeset (105720523). Acho estranho você – com toda a experiência que você tem – confiar mais nas imagens aéreas do que no trabalho de outro mapeador que esteve ai.
Geogast (2021-08-30 21:06:45+00:00): Você arruma isso (revertendo suas edições no lugar)?
AjBelnuovo (2021-08-30 21:58:23+00:00): Por favor , poderia verificar se tudo voltou a aquilo que você tinha feito ?
Geogast (2021-08-31 12:27:52+00:00): Sim, obrigado. Ficou bem. Aliás: é essa a construção: https://youtu.be/AWoJ4dFODRo
Allison P (2022-01-27 03:56:09+00:00): Is there really a garden right on top of the library?
archpdx (2022-01-27 06:00:54+00:00): Thanks for reaching out, IIRC there's some shrubs/flowers surrounding the perimeter of the library so I've remapped the the library to clarify this. I'm not sure if you're also implying that leisure=garden shouldn't be used in places like these. If there's a better tag that can be used, I'd be happy to change it.
felipeeugenio (2021-08-07 22:30:14+00:00): Estimado. Que es esto?
Es claro que las casas no tienen esos tamaños. Está cubriendo con un solo polígono varias casas.

por favor revisar como está mapeada La Serena, Coquimbo, Valparaíso.
Por favor aclarar si acaso esto es para sacar provecho de una App. La Maypría de este trabajo debe ser eliminado.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109291072
felipeeugenio (2021-08-07 22:42:51+00:00): Hola, Si hay dos casas pegadas, entonces son dos polígonos pegados, pero a veces veo que hay unas "casonas" que se ve claramente que son sitios ditintos. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109291072
bamba gueye (2026-01-26 15:46:19+00:00): https://vm.tiktok.com/ZS91YojPMqQ16-RFmJN/
Analyse concepteur et filtrage vue nuageux 
Pinterest avec l'artiste franco_Guinee Gaspard granger Gg
Au 
www.agartou.canalnlog.com/
Excellente visites
Patr1k_P (2022-02-20 12:26:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971049103

ahoj, preco znacis chodniky ako pedestrian, uz som to videl u teba viackrat, ved pedestrian by sa malo znacit v nakupnych oblastiach a pesich zonach, typicky skor vo vacsich mestach......bezne v parkoch a mensich mestach alebo dedinach je to footway

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=pedestrian?uselang=sk

a napr. tu si šupol pedestrian aj do cintorina

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289971582
laznik (2022-02-20 14:28:32+00:00): Ahoj. Nevylucujem, ze sa nestalo, ze som niekde nespravne aplikoval tag pedestrian, ale podla mna na tej komunikacii, ktorej link si uviedol je to spravne. Auto tam prejde (vozi truhly), ale inak je to pre pesich.
Patr1k_P (2022-02-20 15:10:42+00:00): Najskôr ano ale aj tak by som to asi otagoval v iných prípadoch
armitageone (2022-09-13 06:58:38+00:00): У пруда действительно название "Николай"?
aharvey (2021-08-20 13:37:23+00:00): For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971051966/history, the wiki documents service=alley as mainly rear access https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley, whereas this is more a shared driveway which I've been taging as service=driveway, however it seems the wiki indicates service=driveway is for connecting to a specific property. Might be a good one to discuss more on talk-au to work out what's the best way to map shared driveways.
Tom Brennan (2021-08-21 02:10:15+00:00): Agree this is slightly different from most of the other "alley"s in the area. The service tags are somewhat problematic. I don't know that my post in talk-au helped resolve much though!
GeeMaps! (2026-06-05 06:57:03+00:00): G'day B22789. Mate, how's your memory? Been doing some mapping around Binna Burra & want to check the location of Illinbah Camp. You've got it mapped at the return point of Illinbah Circuit, but the newly available Q Topo imagery has it ~200m SW, the other side of the River?
SafetyIng (2021-08-07 08:05:20+00:00): hey, für Paddocks gibt es sogar ein eigenes Tagging:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Danimal_keeping
Rainero (2021-08-07 14:27:16+00:00): Cool, danke für den Hinweis. Hab's gleich nach dem Schema gemacht.
harg (2021-08-07 05:56:29+00:00): Correct note is https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2789706
glibbertorsten (2021-08-08 20:08:34+00:00): Farmyard is not de best description for a brewery
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brewery
osmviborg (2021-08-08 20:24:01+00:00): The brewery is just a minor part of the estate, marked with a POI. https://www.gavnoe.dk/en/gavnoe-estate/
ralley (2021-08-08 07:24:00+00:00): Why have you deleted way  411173270?  It is visible in the aerial imagery you refer to
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109294632
BrentNZ (2021-08-10 05:06:40+00:00): It is a farm track on private property that people keep trying to use to access Mt Karangahake.