piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GerdP (2015-10-22 07:19:21+00:00): please review:
node 3682589684 has rarely used tag
highway=parking_entrance
with
maxheight=1.95
maybe this is a barrier=*?
GerdP (2015-11-03 19:36:38+00:00): I found amenity=parking_entrance, so I've changed it to that, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance
SomeoneElse (2015-08-07 09:44:46+00:00): Hello - if http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364200996 is Part of West Deane Way, then I'd create a route relation for it and add this footpath to it, rather than giving it a name "Part of West Deane Way".  That way when the other parts of West Deane Way are mapped it'll show up on sites such as http://waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=12&lat=51.04377&lon=-3.14052&hill=0# (you can see bits of West Deane Way there already).  Also, it doesn't quite join the road at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3682657825 .
Saxonyking (2016-03-24 21:20:45+00:00): Woher ist der Name "Richters Wäldchen" bekannt?
Isohypse0815 (2016-03-25 18:52:17+00:00): Der Name ist ortsüblich und das Wäldchen gehörte zum ehemaligen Bauernhof Richter (Mühlenstraße 5/5a) in Poppitz.
Saxonyking (2016-03-29 20:27:30+00:00): Ist das dann nicht angebrachter name in loc_name zu ändern?
ratrun (2015-08-15 17:22:24+00:00): Die neuen Sandwege sehen eher unrealistisch aus. Wieso sind sie mit den bestehenden Wegen nicht verbunden und so schnurgerade? Haben sie die bestehenden Pfade ersetzt, dann ist die Lage unrealistisch. Falls sie dazugekommen sind haben sie sicher Kreuzungen mit den Pfaden. Bitte überarbeiten!
GerdP (2015-11-20 09:30:40+00:00): Hi there,
please review my change:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35456935
OK?
rickmastfan67 (2015-08-05 22:48:21+00:00): I'm just curious, but is that path's name really 'Neverending'?  Honestly seems like it wouldn't have any name to be honest.
MapMaxwell (2015-08-05 22:51:23+00:00): That trail doesn't have an official name, but that is the colloquial name at the school and cross country team
rickmastfan67 (2015-08-05 23:07:09+00:00): Alright.  BTW, it looks like this 'path' would be more appropriately tagged as a 'highway=path' instead of as a footway. It's nothing like the 'sidewalk' that is parallel to Cumberland Road that is tagged as such. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
denis_hanke (2015-08-05 17:15:53+00:00): Der Kommentar ist natürlich quatsch - sorry
flohoff (2015-08-06 08:23:38+00:00): Hi,
beim eintragen der K6neu hast du an einer Stelle einen landuse mit einem Track mit der K6neu verbunden. Vermutlich durch einen klick in einem zu hohen zoom level - Da ist dann alles miteinander verklebt worden was in der nähe war.

Landuses und Straßen sollten keine nodes teilen.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=33134821
moosfrosch (2015-08-06 08:46:18+00:00): sorry, klar, das war keine Absicht. Ich weiß aber leider nicht, wie ich das korrigieren kann.
flohoff (2015-08-06 09:21:47+00:00): Mit Potlatch oder ID weiss ich das auch nicht. Habe es gefixed.
moosfrosch (2015-08-06 11:11:45+00:00): Danke!
Glassman (2015-08-05 18:40:15+00:00): Summer Falls State Park is tag as a polygon (the green area) You might want to tag the actual falls waterway=waterfall, name=, height if you know it.
rickmastfan67 (2015-08-05 23:17:23+00:00): Just so you know, we don't abbreviate road names.  We always put the full name in the name tag.  That way, we can leave it up to the data users to abbreviate them on their own if they want to.
nvk (2015-08-07 00:41:40+00:00): This doesn't seem legit.
_mapsam (2015-08-07 00:48:52+00:00): Can confirm. Not legit.
Arnaud Champollion (2021-11-24 06:25:22+00:00): Bonjour,
Je m'interroge sur la pertinence d'ajouter railway=abandoned sur des sections routières où plus aucune trace d' l'ancienne ligne de chemin de fer ne subsiste (par ex la D13, qui la recouvre entièrement).
A priori cet attribut n'est appropié que dans la mesure où l'on peut encore voir les traverses.
Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:railway%3Dabandoned
utack (2016-02-08 19:26:14+00:00): Tag master
Jemand hat ein paar deiner "freistehenden" Hausnummern gelöscht
Waren die dort in der Wiese echt falsch oder nicht?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37085167
master (2016-02-10 19:00:33+00:00): Naja, das ist halt die Hellersiedlung.
Das ist eine der größten Kleingartenanlagen Deutschlands.
Laut Adressliste der Stadt Dresden sind einige der Parzellennummern offizielle Hausnummern und andere nicht.
Ist für mich aber von außen nicht erkennbar, also hab ich alles als Hausnummern eingetragen.
utack (2016-02-10 19:08:00+00:00): Dann könnte man evtl das changeset revertieren, und zumindest die "frei stehenden" hausnummern wieder herstellten, da du sie damals etwa richtig eingetragne hast?
master (2016-02-10 20:10:39+00:00): Ja, ich bin langgegangen und habe das eingetragen was auf dem Schildchen am Gartentor stand.
Man könnte höchstens nachdenken, da andere Tags zu verwenden, aber da weiß ich auch nicht so Bescheid.
Die Information an sich, welche Nummer da wo ist, ist auf jeden Fall relevant.
Da die Hellersiedlung verdammt groß ist, bin ich da nicht so weit gekommen und einige Wege fehlen halt mit den Nummern noch. Was war denn eigentlich die Ursache der Löschung? Hast du da ne Ahnung?
utack (2016-02-10 20:12:15+00:00): Klang so als ob "frei stehende Hausnummern" pauschal als falsch angenommen wurden
master (2016-02-10 20:15:19+00:00): Also wenn du möchtest, kannste das gerne wieder herstellen. Hab da leider gerade keinen Nerv für.
DD1GJ (2015-08-06 10:18:47+00:00): Solche Verschiebungen nach Bing sind in Baden-Württemberg leider total kontraproduktiv. Das Haus war anhand der Daten der Landesvermessung eingezeichnet:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW
Flitzefeuersocke (2015-08-08 18:23:39+00:00): Ok, verstehe. Sie können das gerne wieder rückgängig machen. In der praktischen Nutzung macht es jetzt aber keinen großen Unterschied, oder?
Robert Whittaker (2017-04-27 09:01:20+00:00): Are you sure the postcode of AB12 4SP for http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8038364 is correct, and if so what's your source for it?

According to Code-Point Open, AB12 4SP is for properties on a residential road, Clochandighter Drive, about 2km away.
ABZ_OSM (2017-04-27 20:02:30+00:00): Hi Robert
I drove down the road producing a GPS trace and took photos of the site signs. I am fairly certain the address in full came off a site sign. It was over a year ago. Of course the site sign may not have been correct. Interestingly if you google the business name it produces the same post code. I agree that it is unlikely that it would have the same postcode as Clochandichter Drive.
ABZ_OSM (2017-04-27 20:07:17+00:00): I remember from some reading I did, a long time ago, that there are about 18 addresses  per postcode. Clochandichter Drive has about 21 houses. I do not know why this is.
ABZ_OSM (2017-04-27 20:10:23+00:00): Just checked with an address I know in  Clochandighter Drive. The postcode for that address is AB12 4SP
geevee (2016-09-30 20:10:35+00:00): Do you think it makes sense to have this "drinking water" on the map? For me it looked more like someone's joke rather than a real tap which got broken. Also it had "Eichhof" sign :)
nyampire (2015-08-15 15:53:38+00:00): こんにちは。nyampireと申します。

yosikenさんが以下の変更セットで実施された森林の変更ですが、これにより、奈良県の南部一帯の森林が影響をうけ、osm.org上で消えてしまっているように表示されてしまっているため、変更を差し戻しさせていただきました。

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33143865

yosikenさんによる、位置精度の低い編集を修正したい、という意図は理解しております。

ご不便をおかけしてすみません。日本地域の森林と海岸線の編集については少々面倒な面があり、できれば、既存のウェイを削除するのではなく、修正するように作業していただけると助かります。

もちろん、yasikenさんの編集を邪魔するものではなく、できるかぎり、森林データの位置は正しく表現できたらと感じています。

まずは暫定的な修正をしていますので、位置精度など、意図に沿っていなかったらすみません。

なにかございましたら、このコメントに追記をいただけるか、あるいは僕個人のメッセージ、あるいはnyampire@gmail.comまでご連絡いただければと思います。

よろしくおねがいします。
Skippern (2015-08-08 19:29:39+00:00): Monica

Favor nao marca somente nome nos pontos voce entrando, somente nome sem nenhuma outro informação não crescendo informação no mapa.

Tambem, "alagamento" nao deve ser o nome, procura outros etiquetas, como "hazard" que fui usado muitos locais, mas pelo meu conhecimento não e utilizado no nenhuma consumidor do dados, ou voce pode adicionar como "description" ou "note"
GerdP (2015-10-24 17:51:30+00:00): please review way 6046191:
it is tagged highway=servoce which looks
like highway=service, but Bing shows that
the road crosses a kerb.
andrewdleach (2016-11-23 16:39:03+00:00): Deleted a non existent through street
Hjart (2015-08-06 04:34:27+00:00): Simply replacing existing objects isn't smart. A lot of history is lost this way.
Hjart (2015-08-06 04:38:16+00:00): I feel seriously tempted to revert this just because of that.
Baldr (2015-08-06 15:37:24+00:00): Sorry for all the inconvenience I caused. I'm new to the mapping community. I didn't know the importance given to preservation of history of all maintenance performed on each object. I would take this into account in my upcoming modifications.
Hjart (2015-08-06 22:41:23+00:00): I could see you kept making changes after my attempt to get your attention and since you didn't respond I felt that the only sensible thing I could really do was to revert your work after you had moved on. I'm sorry about that and thank you for respecting history from now on. It's not always possible to maintain an object's history though, but whenever it is, it's valued.
Apart from that, welcome to our project and have a good stay
Viking81 (2018-05-01 11:08:09+00:00): Ciao, devo segnalarti che far coincidere i nodi delle highways con i nodi dei landuse è da evitare, almeno per quattro ragioni:
1) è tecnicamente scorretto, perché la superficie del campo non arriva fino alla mezzeria della strada;
2) si tratta di taggare per il rendering, che è universalmente sconsigliato;
3) fa perdere un sacco di tempo a chi deve fare modifiche successive alle highways e ai landuse, dovendo separare uno per uno i nodi e faticando a selezionare quello voluto;
4) questa pratica è stata deprecata dalla comunità internazionale.
Alberto
GOwin (2015-08-06 07:14:57+00:00): Hey Bunny. You did the traverse? 

GOwin
:)
banito_pinoy (2015-08-06 07:30:01+00:00): Hi GOwin, I did only some sections. Not the whole traverse.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:18:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072390 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
ABausD (2015-10-17 16:43:24+00:00): Hallo
Der Knoten: "Behrens Optik" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3008296749/history) wurde verschoben. Die jetztige Position sieht nicht plausiebel aus (in einer Grünanlage). Kannst du das bitte überprüfen?

Viele Grüße
ABausD
Firefishy (2015-08-06 09:28:24+00:00): Baie Dankie ;-) Great first contribution, thank you for helping improve the map. Looks good. Happy to answer absolutely any questions you might have. - Grant
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:18:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072388 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Conor2000 (2017-06-12 18:44:30+00:00): I'm sorry for this. I now greatly regret this and other mass acts of vandalism. I was younger back then and more foolish. It shames me even to look at this vandalism.
schadow1 (2015-08-06 11:22:02+00:00): Hello. I'm Ervin of Schadow1 Expeditions. I'm currently improving your CGT contribution so that it would render properly into tiles of OSM and on the Garmin GPS map I am compiling weekly on my site. FYI.
Do you have complete trail from Conner to Baguio?
banito_pinoy (2015-08-07 04:03:09+00:00): Hi Ervin, the complete gpx trail data of the Cordillera Great Traverse (CGT) from Conner to Baguio can be downloaded in the Public GPS traces. You can also download the raw gpx data per section.
schadow1 (2015-08-07 05:25:41+00:00): Thanks, Bunny! I was able to download it incorporate it in the map. However, I have renamed it to their generic names as making it as one name Cordillera Great Traverse will affect other existing trails and roads where it passes through. Although the relation is created to tag all of them as part of the hiking network relation, "Cordillera Great Traverse". It made so as well to ensure there will be routing continuity. See relation here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5416994
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:18:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072385 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:18:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072380 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:18:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072375 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Danidin9 (2015-09-09 04:09:40+00:00): Пожалуйста, добавляйте общую точку в месте пересечения тротуара и проезжей части! Также, рекомендую использовать тег amenity=waste_disposal для обозначения контейнеров для бытовых отходов; тег barrier=gate для обозначения ворот.
Vincent de Phily (2015-08-06 14:38:00+00:00): jokes are supposed to be funny, this is just vandalism wasting everybody's time. I've reverted this and your other recent vandalism changesets.

You've been a productive contributor before as far as I can see. Please be that again, and find constructive ways to entertain yourself.
Conor2000 (2017-06-12 18:45:48+00:00): I'm sorry for what happened. I was younger and more foolish back then. I greatly regret this act of vandalism. I hope that we can move on from this. I apologise for making you waste your time.
PeeWee (2015-08-06 12:27:43+00:00): Added Theatre
catoblepa (2015-08-06 17:42:51+00:00): benvenuto su OSM.
Come mai hai deciso di usare il tag designation invece di name?
fiberhood (2015-08-06 13:11:38+00:00): barn collapsed
canfe (2019-04-12 13:04:05+00:00): Ho l’impressione che la strada che porta a Case Togliatto, non si chiami Case Magnetti 
Google la mette addirittura come SP.
Forse c’è da mettere un hamlet…
Gigillo83 (2019-04-12 14:02:23+00:00): La strada che porta a Case Togliatto si chiama Regione Oviglia inferiore e confermo che è una strada provinciale, esattamente la SP729dir1...non so però cosa sia un hamlet...
canfe (2019-04-12 16:50:14+00:00): In effetti il nome è quello, ma... il name:it è case Magnetti.
Ci sono due errori uno sul nome che deve, ovviamente essere identico, e l'altro che non ha senso mettere il nome in italiano se si è in italia. Si usa per piante monumentali ad esempio, che hanno nomi diversi nelle varie lingue.
l'hamlet lo proponevo nel caso fosse applicabile a Case Magnetti.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:place%3Dhamlet
Grazie per aver risposto celermente.
PS: interessa partecipare a riunioni di mappers locali? :-)
Gigillo83 (2019-04-12 17:06:12+00:00): Ops...missà che non capisco molto... Nel senso, il gruppo di case in punta alla SP729dir1 è Case Togliatto...case Magnetti è la zona che comprende anche Case Togliatto...non so se mi riesco a spiegare. 
Per quanto riguarda la tua domanda...certo!! Io sto provando a tenere aggiornate le mappe della mia zona...e mi piacerebbe poter "interagire" con altri user! :)
canfe (2019-04-13 16:25:45+00:00): Risolto: Case Magnetti era già segnato più avanti come hamlet.
La strana NON ha quel nome in italiano (e non ha senso metterlo in... Italia)
Se mi dai l'email ti mando i link per le riunioni e per la videoconferenza di questo lunedì.
wojtas82 (2015-08-06 16:50:17+00:00): czemu area zostały usunięte??
przemas75 (2015-08-07 10:38:45+00:00): Do takiego oznaczenia drogi są inne tagi, ale niestety nie pamiętam dokładnie jakie.
Gdzies jest na forum opisane.
przemas75 (2015-08-07 10:39:49+00:00): O! właśnie ten temat. Nawet zostało pytanie postawione podobne do Twojego.
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=521758#p521758
wojtas82 (2015-08-07 10:48:58+00:00): no rozumiem ale napracowałem się przy tym a Ty to skasowałeś. Otagowane było highway=service area=yes więc chyba poprawnie??
przemas75 (2015-08-07 11:39:12+00:00): Wycofałem mój delete, także powinny się pojawić. Ale nie rób tego "pod render" :) Tam nie było przecięć dróg też i josm wyrzucał sporo błędów (pewnie dlatego wywaliłem, bo zobaczyłem, że to kompletnie zbyteczne ). Jeśli Cię takie micro mapowanie interesuje, to zobacz ten format z forum.
wojtas82 (2015-08-10 13:09:43+00:00): ok, już wszystko jasne. będę tagował tym nowym sposobem, zobaczymy jak to pojdzie. pzdr!
przemas75 (2015-08-11 13:18:18+00:00): http://osmapa.pl/w/area/?lat=54.48527&lon=18.5457&zoom=19&ol=B

Takie moje próby, nawet to wygląda, ale robota raczej jest.... Ja to na relacjach robiłem, inaczej pełno błędów jest, że linie się nakładają.
przemas75 (2015-08-11 13:19:38+00:00): A jeszcze mam pytanie. Te wszystkie living_street (szare ulice na mapie) są naprawde oznaczone znakiem D-40? Na przykład Kwiatowa, Dębowa, Ogrodowa, Różana itd..
wojtas82 (2015-08-12 05:49:56+00:00): Fajnie to wygląda.Ja zacząłem wczoraj skrzyżowanie przy Witawie, rejon Leśniczówki i wezel Wzgórze. Co do tych D-40 to sprawdzę to i dam znać ale chyba nie. Ja robię bez relacji i oznaczam każde przecięcie jako crossing. Masa roboty a geoportal chodzi mi jak krew z nosa. Jest jakiś sposób na zapisywanie kafli?za każdym razem musze ściągać na nowo rejony, które edytuje. Pozdrawiam
wojtas82 (2015-08-12 08:14:11+00:00): Cz możesz pomóc z uporządkowaniem relacji autobusowej w tym miejscu? Nie wiem jak to poprzenosić a rozdzieliłem tutaj ruch na jednokierunkowe i nie wiem jak to powinno być? Będę wdzięczny za wyjaśnienie! :)
wojtas82 (2015-08-12 08:14:22+00:00): zapomniałem : link https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/54.49182/18.51032
EugenyN (2015-08-06 14:25:31+00:00): исправил название. но ещё выдаёт ошибки по мультиполигону.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3796796
GerdP (2015-11-23 14:52:09+00:00): Hi there!
I've noticed a few small errors in this area:
1) What might be meant with surface=2? 
Maybe width=2 ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364385234
2) The ways that describe the "Panama City Beach Parkway" are often tagged
sidewalk=none;right
which makes no sense. I fear the Bing
images are out-aged here, so I don't know which parts have a sidewalk and don't. Do you know the details?
Gehrke (2015-08-07 06:20:56+00:00): Es wurde eine PLZ-Grenze beschädigt.
AsumFace (2015-09-13 16:09:24+00:00): *verkaufen
ediyes (2015-08-06 21:02:34+00:00): Solo prueba :P
naoliv (2015-09-05 03:41:05+00:00): Vítor, teve algum motivo pra apagar tanta coisa e reimportar?
Ficaram muitos nós duplicados após esta edição.
Vítor Dias (2015-09-05 03:57:10+00:00): Eu tive que refazer todos os bairros da cidade porque os dados que importei do IBGE estavam com muitas falhas, derivadas de setores que estavam cadastrados em bairros que não tinham nada a ver com a localização verdadeira dele. Daí usei os dados disponilibizados pela Prefeitura de Betim através do Plano Diretor para refazer todos os limites de bairros.
Владимир К (2016-02-16 08:31:56+00:00): Может на мак стоит повесить amenity=fast_food? ведь без котегорий это просто название здание
Владимир К (2016-02-16 08:32:04+00:00): категорий*
Princeps (2016-02-22 18:38:24+00:00): Двухэтажная железобетонная конструкция это далеко не удовлетворение пищевых потребностей. Пока низя.
Gehrke (2015-08-07 06:39:28+00:00): Destroyed postal boundaries. Reconstruction difficult.
Bulllseye (2015-08-08 18:40:21+00:00): I'm sorry to say, but that line wasnt't marked as postal boundaries so i deleted. Next days I try to reconstruct that boundarie
VA00 (2017-12-20 18:52:12+00:00): Tablica z nazwą (E-17a)  czy teren zabudowany (D-43)?
JakubMap (2018-01-20 11:23:53+00:00): City_limit oznacza znak informacyjny o ograniczeniu prędkości zgodnie z obowiązującym w Polsce prawem drogowym w terenie zabudowanym, zatem tam musi być tablica D-43 (oznaczająca teren zabudowany). Jeśli chodzi o znak E-17a to nie pamiętam żeby w tamtym miejscu był razem z D-43 (choć powinien być z zasady), ale to było 2 lata temu. Tam był spory bajzel w znakach, np.  w Brzoskwini brakowało znaku odwoławczego D-43. Od Aleksandrowa na Brzoskwinię też było coś namieszane w znakach prędkości.
gsa (2016-12-03 18:22:59+00:00): Does this really make sense? 

Wikidata claims, that Chaussée Brunehaut (Q2961670) is a road in Germany. 

Moreover, the corresponding Wikipedia articles are not about one particular road, but about roads of that name in general.
Cavit (2015-08-06 19:46:13+00:00): additional source: vogis.cnv.at: Echtfarbenbild-Winter-2015-20cm (Datenquelle: Land Vorarlberg – data.vorarlberg.gv.at)
ediyes (2015-08-06 20:35:23+00:00): hola, esta bien tu cambio
rickmastfan67 (2015-08-07 03:37:07+00:00): Haha, you beat me in doing this. :)
rickmastfan67 (2015-08-07 03:41:56+00:00): BTW, you might want to fix the traffic light nodes.  You added the 'surface=asphalt' tag to all of them it seems.
Chris Lawrence (2015-08-09 03:53:23+00:00): Fixed.
Skippern (2015-08-08 19:44:18+00:00): Renato, bem vindo ao OSM

So para te avisar, nao marcamos os extremidades das ruas.
GOwin (2015-08-09 11:21:45+00:00): Hi Sheikara. I'm curious about your edits. I notice that the building trace you've put on the map are of similar sizes and shape, but looking at the satellite imagery, these features are not visible at all (ie. houses, basketball courts, etcetera.)

Can you tell me how you're mapping these  features?
schadow1 (2015-08-07 05:34:02+00:00): Hi Bunny, please maintain the CGT data to my last changeset. They where as its generic name primariliy due to routing compatibility (e.g. Apayao Trail, tagging for ford=yes on river crossings only)
The CGT name is placed as a relation to indicate where the trail is part of. This is also to ensure a more coherent naming convention eventhough they pass through some roads and other tracks and with other already existing trails to where CGT has passed.
naoliv (2015-09-05 03:59:57+00:00): badoo, por favor, não altere a classificação das cidades. A classificação é dada pela população do local.
"village" não significa que o local é uma vila, mas que possui uma população menor de 10 mil habitantes.
Use essa tabela para evitar erros futuros: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Key:place#Valores
DemoLogin (2019-10-26 09:44:06+00:00): Некорректное значение поля network.
Номера маршрутов можно указать в теге description или fixme, для будущей отрисовки маршрутов
Glassman (2015-08-08 05:50:47+00:00): We usually don't name driveways unless there is a street sign. What are you trying to add? Maybe I can help.
Drachentoeter (2015-08-07 11:15:40+00:00): Warum sind die Haltestellen gelöscht wurden???
Drachentoeter (2015-08-07 09:38:42+00:00): Du hast gerade erfolgreich teile der Straße und Straßenbahnlinie zerstört. Bitte das nächste mal, wenn gelöscht wird, mehr aufpassen!!!
map per (2021-01-28 10:56:40+00:00): Hallo MENTZ_TU,

ist dort (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364465369) wirklich ein Fahrradparkplatz? Die Frage kam in der Note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2507072) auf.

Und das sieht auch ziemlich unpraktisch aus. Mit dem Fahrrad müsste man vermutlich erst mit dem Aufzug auf die Brücke, dann mit dem Aufzug zum Bahnsteig um dann am hintersten Ende des Bahnsteiges sein Fahrrad zu parken.

Viele Grüße
map per
ubahnverleih (2015-08-07 09:56:04+00:00): I guess you accidentally uploaded some Tests here?
Tamami (2015-08-07 13:43:16+00:00): Owh ya, thank you for warn me that mistake.. I erase them now.. :)
SomeoneElse (2015-08-17 14:24:16+00:00): Hi - thanks for fixing.  If you don't mind me asking, what was the "example data" from that got uploaded?  I'm wondering if we could perhaps do something like https://github.com/hotosm/learnosm/issues/335 to try and prevent other people uploading the same test data (a dozen or so people have also done so), but in order to do that we'd need to know where it comes from.
Thanks - andy.
pratikyadav (2016-08-16 10:01:52+00:00): Hey there,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5419460/history
this seems like a U-turn rather than a left turn, based on mapillary imagery.

Regards, Pratik