piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rickmastfan67 (2020-01-08 12:53:30+00:00): If you're talking about something like this ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760504856 ), that is an emergency U-Turn for Cops & other emergency vehicles, and not for public use on these toll highways (same goes for their counterparts on Interstates). Thus, they aren't considered at-grade intersections.
jlevente (2020-01-08 13:04:59+00:00): Yeah, you're right. Bad image choice from my part. I meant to show the intersection to the boat slipway on the right on US27 and the *legal* U-turn lanes which makes that particular section highway=trunk. As you say, emergency u-turn sites with access=no on till highways is still definitely motorway.
Baloo Uriza (2020-01-08 14:54:47+00:00): Minor clarification for rickmastfan67... a lot of misnamed roads that call themselves Expressways but are really freeways.  Expressways have at grade crossings, and they can also have grade-separated crossings.  Freeways only have grade-separated.
rickmastfan67 (2020-01-08 15:11:30+00:00): Oh, I know that Baloo.  Especially because of where I live where all the Interstates have the name of 'Parkway'.
floridaeditor (2020-01-08 15:22:24+00:00): Okay, rickmastfan67, you could be a little nicer. Writing 'common sense' as a source is rude.
Baloo Uriza (2020-01-08 15:24:52+00:00): Oh, the Parkway thing is another factor, a lot of the earliest motorways in America were Parkways, and intentionally built with low overpasses.  A pretty dark time in highway history for America...
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:03:23+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:03:19+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
BCNorwich (2020-07-03 06:44:37+00:00): Hi, I've removed several of your fictional bridge tags. Please try not to add fictional tags.

Regards Bernard.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 01:03:12+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067696
skfd (2020-01-03 13:26:35+00:00): Привет! Тут уже было проставлено и это адекватно для музейного экспоната:
historic=vehicle
vehicle=tank
Теги ниже подходят для техники которая посвящена какому-то событию или группе людей (типа "Воинам-интернационалистам" или что-то такое)
historic=memorial
memorial=tank
skfd (2020-01-03 13:57:10+00:00): Сорри, еще одна штука. На сайте музея написано что про чашу "Вогонь Слави", мне кажется лучше так и оставить.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:26:44+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067317
abakus_uploader (2020-01-03 23:30:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:26:49+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067317
mbethke (2020-01-09 02:51:52+00:00): Hi, thanks for tracing! Keep in mind this is rural Sri Lanka though: those are regular unpaved residential streets that people drive on, not "open to all non-motorized vehicles and not intended for motorized vehicles unless tagged so separately" as paths are by default. Their surface may well look similar to the path here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath but for routing purposes it's important to remember they're really meant for motor vehicles, too, in this part of the world.

cheers,
Matthias
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:26:54+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067317
eggie (2020-01-03 14:08:09+00:00): Top!
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:26:58+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067317
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:27:03+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067317
eggie (2020-01-03 14:24:49+00:00): Dag Eric.. 
Elk begin is lastig. 
Hier is het gebied van je edits zo groot omdat je het gras geplakt heb aan de landuse=residential van Tynaarlo.
Ik heb het weer losgemaakt.
landuse=forest is geen publiek groen, maar geeft aan wat er te zien is. Je hoeft dat niet te verwijderen omdat het op privaat terrein zou liggen. 
Dit was je edit  http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79157301
MVG,
Eggie
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:27:09+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067317
Sergiy Kozyr (2020-01-06 10:51:31+00:00): Removed relation #4225810. Members of this relation are moved to other multipoligons.
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:04:30+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067079
SteFra (2020-01-07 16:03:51+00:00): The tag "shop garden_centre" for "Oscar Tintori" was already present, now is double....as you can see on the map
siaud xavier (2020-01-07 16:17:50+00:00): voila c'est corrigé
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:04:36+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067079
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2020-01-04 13:17:24+00:00): Careful about using RapiD! You've added some roads which go through hedges & the like here.

I've fixed it up here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79188422
Reino Baptista (2020-01-05 16:06:03+00:00): Sorry about that.
Any mishap were unintentional.
RB
GeorgeKaplan (2020-01-03 15:29:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Bienvenue sur OSM ! L'ajout d'un arbre se fait avec natural=tree. natural=wood est utilisé pour marquer un bois.
Voir le détail sur le wiki : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:natural%3Dtree
De plus, on indique l'essence avec genus ou species, pas en utilisant le champ name.

A disposition pour plus de détails,
George
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79159266
limes11 (2025-08-21 18:45:50+00:00): Moin, 

was meintest du denn mit 64A68 ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240710478

Beide Hausnummern am gleichen Gebäude ?

Dann sollten das zwei Knoten sein für die beiden Adressen

Viele Grüße
BCNorwich (2020-01-03 15:18:29+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
just to inform you that in the absence of a oneway tag OSM infers oneway=no, thus your oneway=no tags are not needed. I've removed them for you.
Regards Bernard.
mapman44 (2020-01-28 06:30:55+00:00): The edits made in this changeset and and in changeset 79161304 depict a construction project that has barely begun. No real changes have been made in the existing roads at this point in time and they should not have been deleted. These two changesets are being reverted. Please do not edit existing roads unti they have actually been changed on the ground.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79159789
mapman44 (2020-01-28 06:36:07+00:00): The edits in this changeset and in changeset 79161304 depict a construction project that has barely begun. Construction of the railroad part of the project will not even begin until 2021 but they are already shown on the map. These two changesets will be reverted. The OSM map should not be changed until the roads on the ground actually change.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79159789
InsertUser (2020-01-04 17:09:41+00:00): Is this the name of the beach/bay itself or of a business on the beach?
Rom1 (2020-01-08 12:11:09+00:00): Bonjour, merci de ne pas transformer les voies taguées en highway=path + foot=designated + bicycle=designated... en highway=cycleway. Il ne s'agit pas dans le cas présent de voies exclusivement cyclables mais bien de voies partagées pour piétons et cyclistes.
Rom1 (2020-01-08 12:17:06+00:00): Suite... Et utiliser le tag "description" plutôt que "name". Merci
Luzandro (2020-01-04 06:51:35+00:00): Hallo,

bitte vergib keine Beschreibungen und Fantasienamen als name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79160975
Akkurator (2020-01-23 02:13:11+00:00): zur Info:
ich haben an Rosenweg 3+5 und zugehörigen Garagen einige falsche tags entfernt:
- Nebengebäude wie Garagen bekommen keine Adresse.
- 2 Gebäude mit der gleichen Adresse geht nicht.
- Eine Adresse ist kein Name.
- Unvollständige Adressen (nur Straße ohne Hausnummer) vermeiden.
Bitte künftig mehr Sorgfalt. Und im wiki lesen.
Grüße,
Akkurator
eggie (2020-01-03 16:22:45+00:00): Hi.. I merged the info with the present addressnode.
gr eggie
mapman44 (2020-01-27 19:17:37+00:00): I am unable to find any indication of the edits in this changeset in the Kandiyohi County GIS map nor in the Enterprise MnDOT Mapping Application. I tried to access the .png file you referenced but was unsuccessful. Are these changes that have already happened or  plans for future construction?
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-04-05 06:13:54+00:00): Hi ch_ram,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/760537652) based on maxar premium. I also made some changes around this changeset.
Thank you, happy mapping!
ch_ram (2022-04-18 16:13:51+00:00): Hi Ficky IRM-ED,
Trust you are doing good, Thanks for reviewing the data, and Thank you for the edits.
Russ McD (2020-03-01 04:35:27+00:00): Jay - please respect local Thai mapping guidelines for the status of roads.  We have a Wiki that explains this.
You have changed the Rural roads around Nong Bua Lam Phu to Primary, while downgrading the main Hwy 201 to secondary.  I can only assume this is a misguided attempt to force traffic around the city.  I am manually reverting the change today, and would ask that if you disagree with local mapping convention, you have the decency to join the Thai forum and put your case across.
I'm guessing you dont live here ... we do, so please refrain from trashing our work in this manner. Russ.
Russ McD (2020-03-01 04:38:17+00:00): Furthermore, I see you cud not even be bothered to change the U-turns and links to match the new status.  All this does is add to workload when we run error checking programs.  May I ask where else you have been arbitrarily changing roads in Thailand ?
Russ McD (2020-03-01 04:42:49+00:00): And you have changed the unclassified frontage roads to primary_links on one side of the Hwy 210, but not on the other.
Any rationale, or just tradie work ?
Frontage roads are for local traffic to access shops, and not for caars to fly down at exit ramp speeds.  That's why we tag them this way !
Jay May (2020-03-01 09:03:42+00:00): First of all, good morning.
At first, I would kindly appreciate if you  changed your tone.
Second: I never do such things arbitrarily, and, at my age, my purpose would certainly not be vandalizing, but improving the map and placing ground truth over theory.
If there is a convention (which I didn't know and I would kindly ask you to direct me to), I would gladly discuss it before making any changes. There are countries where I am still discussing that. There are also quite a lot of countries where those conventions are disregarded by local users and/or outdated.
My aims and guidelines are very clear:
1) leading transit traffic out of the city center. This is something I did in several other countries and it was approved by local communities. Some of them even understood at once this aim, before I even explained it.
Thailand is the perfect example of a country needing such changes IMO: my OSM-based app led me right through city centers where I lost a lot of time, instead of leading me through bypasses (with an inferior OSM classification) It is just as if the M25 around London had a much inferior classification than the A20, A2, A1, etc. Imagine the giant mess this would make while transiting through the London area from Dover to Birmingham.
2) Lead the road exactly as the path on satellite images (which is, many times, not the case in Thailand)
3) Mapping accurately border checkpoints and border areas, so people know until where exactly they can go and, if possible, through which lane(s) they need to go with their vehicle and/or password.

There are 2 questions regarding which I'm not exactly sure what you refer to, but I will try to provide you an accurate reply, although without screenshots it won't be easy:
- Regarding U-turns and their restrictions, I did map them actually. They were initially not mapped (if we are referring to the same ones)
- Regarding any "link" tag ("highway link, primary link, etc.), the only things I tag as "link" (as per OSM Wiki) is ramps. In the case of Thailand, it can also be some left turns.
Hope this helps.
Kind regards,
Russ McD (2020-03-01 10:45:06+00:00): Hello Jay - My tone is one born out of frustration, so apologies if it sounded harsh.  Your intent to lead traffic out of the cities, should not cause you to change the status of roads. This can be achieved to a certain degree by adding the correct speed limits and not changing the classification tag.
Examples of incorrect U-turn tags were not as prevalent as I initially thought but in changing the "ring road" to Secondary, you did leave some of the U-turns as Tertiary_links, which is not really correct. They should match the parent roads they link.
I note your analogy to the M25, but that's not the case here. Our wiki at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand asks that you tag according to current road numbering with respect to 3 and 4 digit National Highways getting Primary & Secondary status, while a Provincial prefix warrants Tertiary.
But even then, you chose not to contact me, or search on the Thai user forum, but just make the changes.
I ride this road to Udon on a regular basis, and I can assure you that the "bypass" was built to facilitate access to Government Offices under construction, rather than a way around the centre - the current Highway even with its traffic lights, does that job admirably.
And with regard to satellite images, Thailand has poor and outdated imagery, and if you are moving roads back to suit the image, please don't.  We have a number of major roads now completed, that just don't appear on the imagery, the Chiang Rai & Chiang Saen bypasses perhaps being the most notable.
So, I will finish by apologising of my tone was not right, but I expect Im older than you at 60, and ridden/mapped through a damn sight more countries .... my point remains unchanged ... please don't change road status in Thailand just because you think traffic should go another way.
There will always be exceptions, and we are still reeling from the damage done my Kaart and Grab (taxi), changing roads to suit their beliefs.  You are welcome to challenge anything but would invite you to join our forum and explain why first.
Rgds, Russ.
Jay May (2020-03-01 15:48:44+00:00): Hi Russ,
I understand. I actually based my edits on Maxar satellite imagery, which is the best one for some countries I work a lot on (Belarus, the Baltic countries, Western Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Singapore, Southern Peninsular Malaysia ...). However, from what you describe above, looks like Maxar is not exactly the best satellite imagery for Thailand.
Perhaps you should add a not for some roads (I sometimes do that when something changed that isn't visible on satellite imagery).
Anyway, let's keep in touch. Although I am currently not planning any further edits in Thailand (perhaps with the exception of some border checkpoint), I can ask for your suggestion. I also use the comment function (you know, the red little dialog boxes) when I see a problem or I have a doubt.
Regards,
Russ McD (2020-03-03 01:08:03+00:00): Hi,
Unfortunately for us, we lost Maxar after Facebook had finished its automated edits of the Country and only have Bing at present. You are right, it was the best.
I do leave note tags when appropriate, but I am not familiar with the comment function you mention.  Is this a feature of the editor, given I use Potlatch2 ?
Rgds.
eggie (2020-01-03 16:07:36+00:00): Dag mbch  Het adres svp niet op het gebouw zelf zetten (outline)  Dat staat al op de adresnode. 
Ook de naam kan weer van het gebouw af. Dat staat al op het vlak amenity=school. Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-03 16:09:01+00:00): Helaas niet correct. Het adres bevindt zich al op de adresnode van het Kadaster.
Verwijder je het adres weer?
dgitto (2020-01-04 00:02:15+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2020-01-04 00:09:21+00:00): ma "computer angels" non credo proprio sia il nome dell'edificio !
dgitto (2020-01-04 00:10:50+00:00): inoltre, in Italia, non mettiamo i tag address agli edifici, ma va mappato il civico (come nodo distinto)
eggie (2020-01-03 16:10:23+00:00): Adres svp verwijderen. Adressen horen niet op de "outline" van gebouwen in OSM Nederland. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-03 16:51:17+00:00): Duplikaatinfo heb ik verwijderd. Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG,
eggie
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-03 06:32:59+00:00): Is there a reason this area was converted to a way and a note was left on the way (just generic), but not the area or the changeset that generated that area?

I'm trying to understand what was done and whether this area should just be removed.  Please advise.
Akkurator (2020-01-23 02:20:17+00:00): Hallo Til Man,
du hast hier im Rosenweg access-tags gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155411233
access=private bedeutet: Privatweg, niemand fremdes darf dort rein.
Aber dann gibst du foot, bicycle, motor_vehicle und horse für jedermann frei.
Das ergibt keinen Sinn.
Wie ist die Beschilderung genau?

Außerdem ist maxspeed=7 eingetragen. Das lässt auf verkehrsberuhigte Straße ("Spielstraße") schließen. Ist das so?

Grüße,
Akkurator
Akkurator (2020-02-08 10:54:04+00:00): Hallo Til Man,
es wäre nett, wenn du dir das ansehen und korrigieren könntest, oder hier antwortest.
Grüße,
Akkurator
Akkurator (2020-02-12 01:17:57+00:00): Halloloho, jemand da?
wgwksch_2020 (2020-02-12 08:45:06+00:00): nein bin nicht da....
Aber das du wieder ruhig schlafen kannst - diese Straße ist eine Privatstraße - eine von zwei im Gemeindegebiet Salem.
Akkurator (2020-02-12 12:41:36+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort.
Also ist das zwar ein Privatweg, aber ohne ausgeschilderte Zugangsbeschränkung, d.h. jeder darf dort mit Motorfahrzeugen Fahrrad, Pferd und zu Fuß rein? Korrekt?
Dann wäre access=permissive angebracht und die anderen Tags weg.
Das entspräche einem Schild "Privatweg" ohne weitere Zusätze.
Was access=private genau bedeutet, steht hier beschieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dprivate
Beschreibung weiterer Zugangstags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access#Werte
Wenn dort aber ein Schild "Privatweg, Duchgang verboten" steht, wären die Tags so wie sind auch nicht richtig.

Daher meine Frage eingangs: Wie ist die Beschilderung genau?
Gutes Hilfsmittel für Verkehrsschilder: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Und steht dort ein Schild "7 km/h"?
Oder ist es doch eine "Spielstraße" (Nr. 325, Verkehrsberuhigter Bereich)?

PS: Habe bitte Verständnis dafür, dass man bei Neumappern mit gerade mal 11 Edits bei Zweifeln etwas genauer nachfragt und auch nachhakt, wenn nach 2-3 Wochen noch keine Antwort kommt. Gerade Einsteiger haben beim Zugangs-Tagging häufig Probleme - und dass die Karte stimmt ist wichtiger als guter Schlaf ;-)
Akkurator (2020-02-16 23:36:58+00:00): Ich war heute am Rosenweg: Es ist keinerlei Beschilderung mit Zugangseinschränkungen irgendwelcher Art vorhanden. Kein "Privatweg", kein "Anlieger frei", auch keine explizite Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkung, kein "Verehrsberuhigter Bereich."
Das ist also von der Beschilderung her eine Straße wie jede andere in diesem Wohngebiet.
Daher habe ich die access-Tags und maxspeed entfernt. Die Beschilderung vor Ort rechtfertigt diese Tags einfach nicht.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81083643
Akkurator (2020-02-29 16:04:52+00:00): Der Kollege ist uneinsichtig:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81386374
Hier ein Bild der Straße:
https://abload.de/img/rosenweg_202002168vjvt.jpg
Kein Schild, keine Zugangsbeschränkung.
mueschel (2020-01-04 12:17:56+00:00): Hallo,
hier ist wohl etwas mit der Hausnummer schiefgegangen, kannst du mal nachschauen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760557490

Gruß
Jan
mueschel (2020-01-04 10:20:03+00:00): Please make sure you don't upload your internal QA markers('dupe') to the OSM database!
l3BAM (2020-07-14 14:31:04+00:00): Bonjour. Les cimetières municipaux français ne sont pas destinés à la religion chrétienne seule mais accueille toutes les relogions et aussi les athées. Il faut donc supprimer les attributs religion et denomination sur
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82626528
dx125 (2020-01-03 19:12:00+00:00): Hello ALPZz,
something is wrong here.
I have here with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79162696
performed a necessary revert (the aerial photos are out of date at this crossroads).
And now with changeset 79164314 you have brought this crossing back into the wrong state.
I think this is a misunderstanding or a bug from a mechanical edit.
greetings
dx125
dx125 (2020-01-06 14:30:40+00:00): with Changeset 79252446 again reverted to the correct state
NonnEmilia (2020-01-07 07:54:54+00:00): Ciao mattio, innanzitutto grazie per il tuo prezioso lavoro su OSM!

In questo changeset hai unito tutti i pezzi della rotonda di via Vertoiba in un unico percorso. Può sembrare la scelta ottimale, ma in questo modo si sono rotte le relazioni delle linee degli autobus. Quando una rotonda è spezzata in più segmenti solitamente è perché di lì ci passa un autobus che percorre solo un pezzo della rotonda. O meglio all'inversa: quando si disegnano le linee del trasporto pubblico le rotondevengono spezzate in tatni pezzetti quanti sono i segmenti utilizzati dalle linee. Ciao!
kreuzschnabel (2020-05-11 09:45:15+00:00): Ist der Hirschelgraben in Hahnstätten tatsächlich fast ein Kilometer weit bis zur Aar verrohrt, statt ihn einfach in den Hohlenfelsbach einzuleiten? Hat Hahnstätten zuviel Geld?
UliFR (2020-05-11 10:25:46+00:00): Letzteres sicher nicht (mehr), aber vielleicht damals die Firma, die im Hirschelbruch Kalkstein abgebaut hat. Der Bach lief früher offen durch die Brückenstrasse und wurde vielleicht auch für Abwasser genutzt. Eine Abdeckung mit Betonplatten kam später.  Der Hohlenfelsbach führt deutlich mehr Wasser, zuviel für den kleinen Graben in der Brückenstrasse, und früher auch mal ordentlich Hochwasser (sagen die Alten). Der Hohlenfelsbach hat den früheren Wassergraben des Biebersteinschen Schlösschens versorgt, vielleicht wollte er Freiherr den Dreck aus dem Steinbruch nicht bei seinen Enten. Evt. wurde damit auch die Wasserführung im Mühlgraben ergänzt, die Aar hat im Sommer zeitweilig wenig Wasser.
Jordi MF (2020-01-03 22:41:52+00:00): Bienvenido a OSM!

He revisado estos cambios. Parece que todo está bien! Me sorprende una cosa: en este changeset hay una pista (track) que, cuando pasa por debajo de la autopista, al noroeste, se convierte en un camino (path). ¿Esto es correcto? ¿La pista (por la que puede circular un coche/4x4/tractor) se convierte en camino (solo pueden circular personas/bicis/caballos)?

Si tienes dudas, no dudes en ponerte en contacto con la comunidad de usuarios de OSM. Tenemos varios grupos en Telegram (el grupo español, valenciano, catalán). Únete al que quieras si necesitas ayuda (algunos usuarios estamos en todos).

Saludos y buen mapeo!!
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:12:05+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067160
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:10:05+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067134
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:10:00+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067134