piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Athalis (2017-04-09 21:29:38+00:00): Quelle für die access Änderung an way 206902810 und südlich ist knowledge und nicht survey - insb. für Fußgänger gibt es dort keine Beschränkungen
eggie (2017-04-10 09:12:10+00:00): Wanneer je gewoon een vuurtoren plaatst op het zuiderhavenhoofd die er niet is dan breng je schade toe aan de kaart. De kaart wordt ook gebruikt in openseamap. 
De lichtopstanden zijn er wel met de info voor de scheepvaart. 
Je kunt reageren.
usaf8 (2017-04-12 00:06:13+00:00): could ot find a better OMS symbol to the lighthouse or light or beacon in the zuiderhavenhoofd
http://mapio.net/pic/p-60821501/
anyway, no problem with your edits as far as i'm concerned.
eggie (2017-04-12 06:35:01+00:00): You are mistaken. It;s not the lighthouse. The beacons (harbour entrance) are on the map. I removed the tourism viewpoint (former mapper) because that's the beacon node from openseamap.
Please scroll to Scheveningen.
http://openseamap.org/index.php?id=openseamap&no_cache=1
It's not rendering only on the seamap.
So there is a OSM-division in making seamaps. A lighthouse will harm the map. 
It's a serious matter. I'm not joking. 
 
By the way..The real lighthouse is situated here.. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.10412/4.26860  Vuurtoren Scheveningen.
I know because I lived beside that lighthouse.
d1g (2017-04-10 04:27:55+00:00): Настоятельно прошу ответить на вопрос в http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47049341
d1g (2017-04-10 09:40:10+00:00): я уж думал он и правда ответит или исправит тот ужас который он создал, но увы

очередные "обвинения не обоснованы", выдумывание правил, игнорирование исправлений, игнорирование предыдущих личных обращений, игнорирование вопросов откуда он знает где и что (http://www.openstreetmap.org/about) с переходом истерику
dr&mx (2017-04-10 11:39:51+00:00): что это?
знаю, потому что регулярно проезжаю по этим местам. сколько еще раз повторить чтобы запомнилось?
eggie (2017-04-10 08:39:34+00:00): Wat zij details? What do you mean with details?
usaf8 (2017-04-12 00:41:14+00:00): it's just a summary of minor edits. in this case was generally a classification from "water" to "lake" and "pond", as the prior tag "water" was an inadequate generality for a map.
eggie (2017-04-12 06:44:54+00:00): That's more clear to other mappers. Details .. than we must guess whats done here.
By the way.. it's "waterwingebied"  (Drinkingwater) for the city of Amsterdam.
redrace (2017-05-06 17:19:08+00:00): HUHU
Das ist das Problem wenn man von veralteten Bing-Bilder abzeichnet ohne Ortskenntnis! Die Gebäude wurden abgerissen. Darum hatte ich sie auch entfernt! Ich hab jetzt ein removed:building draus gemacht!
Schjöne Grüße
unsungNovelty (2017-04-10 09:51:24+00:00): Hi Konstantin Sklyannikov,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Happy to see you mapping. I see that in this changeset you have edited the building for 
Шарапово-Охотская школа school. You have changed the tag of the building to amenity=school. Amenity=school is used for the boundary of the whole school and not for an individual building. I have corrected this for now. If you are in doubt at any time about what tags to use for something, just google :) Or if you have any other doubts or questions you can always message me or comment on this changeset. I will be more than happy to help you :)
You can also go through this OSM beginners guide in Russian -> http://learnosm.org/ru/beginner/

Happy Mapping and Regards, :)
Nikhil Prabhakar.
Glassman (2017-04-10 02:37:14+00:00): Can you add a tag to describe europe express 's business? like shop=fashion. That way the node will render.
opelta178 (2017-04-10 14:31:03+00:00): Yes, thanks for the help!
kartler175 (2017-04-14 09:45:21+00:00): iD too has a shortcut to square corners:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts#Modifying_objects
Glassman (2017-04-10 02:44:56+00:00): I added the building back. Did you remove it on purpose?
opelta178 (2017-04-10 14:12:58+00:00): No, I didn't mean to remove the building. Sorry new to editing.
eggie (2017-04-10 08:36:46+00:00): Reverted due to ignorance.
usaf8 (2017-04-10 21:25:42+00:00): ok. fine with me
SomeoneElse (2017-04-09 21:28:13+00:00): The untagged names in here (e.g. "Antenatal") aren't errors, they're just placeholders for department locations that will need tags adding once I (or someone else) has figured out a sensible way to tag them.
eggie (2017-04-10 08:04:09+00:00): Why did you deleted the name of the Island Griend?
usaf8 (2017-04-12 00:21:55+00:00): Hi eggie .. the reason is that the name Griend was written both in the area "island", meaning the entire island, which is correct, and the "scrub" part of the island,, which is not fully correct. so visibly in OSM there was a sudden repetition of the same name that suggested needing some minor clean up. the name Griend belongs to the island, not the the scrub .. the scrub is only the type of vegetation in part of the island, being the island the entire territory that is the object of the name. anyway i will not revert your edits. feel free to make any corrections yourself.
Rainero (2017-07-04 22:15:03+00:00): Die PLZ des POI Stattauto München war ursprünglich richtig; hab's revertiert.
Hier war der Verlauf der PLZ-Grenze falsch, daher die Fools-Meldung.
eggie (2017-04-10 08:01:29+00:00): What do you mean with "details" in your comment? Other mappers don't understand what you are doing.
Please answer.
eggie (2017-04-10 08:09:51+00:00): Please don;t touch the coastline as a starting mapper.
usaf8 (2017-04-10 21:25:16+00:00): ok. sorry for the lack of extensive comment. in this changeset i generally added several breakwaters. feel free to make necessary adjustments. thank you.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-05-18 14:35:20+00:00): Certain du nom "Étoile d'Endynion" ? Cette orthographe est tellement rare qu'elle en est suspecte - et le nom dans la version précédente est "Étoile d'Endymion"... Une source pour appuyer dans un sens ou dans l'autre ?
racingfoli (2021-05-22 10:47:28+00:00): Je n'ai plus la source. Peut-être une erreur de clavier entre le N et le M. Les touches sont l'une à coté de l'autre sur mon clavier BÉPO.
unsungNovelty (2017-04-10 10:29:38+00:00): Hi Tobi2001,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap, the largest data project in the world! I saw that you have added a greenfield and a pond which doesn't look present in the satellite imagery. The greenfield can only be used for large areas where there has been no buildings etc in the past. And the pond doesn't look to be present. I have corrected this for now. You can understand about OpenStreetMap more in this new OSM beginners guide -> learnosm.org/en/beginner/. Check it out and let me know if you have any questions. You can message me or comment on this changeset comment with your doubts / questions. I will be more than happy to help you out :)

Best Regards and Happy mapping,

Nikhil Prabhakar
maraf24 (2017-04-11 18:16:08+00:00): Wycofałem.
maraf24 (2017-04-11 18:22:24+00:00): 39.3 czy 39? 
To nie ma żadnego znaczenia, bo ta wysokość nie jest wyznaczona precyzyjnie, a na dodatek nie jest w obowiązującym w OSM systemie WGS-84, ale pewnie Kronsztadt-86.
A położenie korygowałem 5 dni temu.
Pink Duck (2020-10-25 15:50:11+00:00): It seems you erroneously removed the default access=no from the bus/cycle-only section of road 3 years back linking Clover Hill Road with Earlham Green Lane. Or was there a reason for doing this?
Mike Baggaley (2020-10-25 16:51:17+00:00): Hi, access=no is incorrect as it prohibits pedestrian traffic. The way has motor_vehicle=no which prohibits motor vehicles other than those specified and is the correct prohibition.
Pink Duck (2020-10-25 17:01:28+00:00): So are you saying the legal sign bus and cycle blue instruction type means pedestrians are permitted? That seems risky considering it's a bus lane.
Mike Baggaley (2020-10-25 17:10:14+00:00): The only pedestrian prohibition sign in the UK is a walking person in a red circle. Otherwise pedestrians are allowed. We map the legal status, not safety. I would say it is far safer to walk in a bus lane than the main highway as there is much less traffic!
Pink Duck (2020-10-25 17:24:44+00:00): The pavements are legal for pedestrians of course, but that split-section of road is not legally permitted to walk and has no pavement. The resolution could be to explicitly create a footpath/sidewalk for pedestrian routing while maintaining the correct legal restriction on the road ways.
Mike Baggaley (2020-10-25 18:00:40+00:00): Why do you think that walking is not legal on that section of road? It is legal to walk of any public highway whether or not is has a pavement unless it is a motorway, motorway slip or has a no walking sign. Most of the UK road signs apply to either vehicular traffic or motor vehicular traffic only. Pedestrians can also walk on cycleways unless specifically prohibited and on segregated cycleways the segregation only applies to the cyclists; pedestrians can use all of it.
Pink Duck (2020-10-25 18:04:04+00:00): In this case there's separate pavement provision and the sign 'only' implies all except listed mode types, which to me excludes pedestrians. I've been trying to find where in law it's okay for pedestrians to walk in bus lanes or in zones such as this. Am fine with tagging to law, just want to be certain about the legal interpretation.
Pink Duck (2020-10-25 18:36:55+00:00): DfT "Know Your Traffic Signs" contains "Blue circles generally give a mandatory instruction,such as 'turn left', or indicate a route available only to particular classes of traffic, e.g. buses and cycles only" and "Blue rectangles are used for information signs except on motorways where blue is used for direction signs". Traffic can be understood to include pedestrians, though OED defines as vehicular.
Mike Baggaley (2020-10-25 18:50:50+00:00): The copy at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/519129/know-your-traffic-signs.pdf on page 16 says "A BLUE CIRCLE generally gives a positive
(mandatory) instruction or indicates a route for use only by
particular classes of vehicle (see sections on tram signs and bus
and cycle signs)."
Pink Duck (2020-10-26 09:12:51+00:00): Good spot, so I guess all that's needed is to revise motor_vehicle=no to vehicle=no, with the override more-specific exemptions for psv/bicycle and default UK foot=yes.
Pink Duck (2020-10-26 09:25:25+00:00): Re-reading that again though it is restricting route use to particular classes of vehicle, not necessarily exempting foot or horse-drawn carriage, say. TSRGD2016 Schedule 3 also headed "Upright signs that indicate regulatory requirements for moving traffic". So I remain unconvinced.
Mike Baggaley (2020-10-26 18:34:51+00:00): If you look at the Road Traffic Act 1988 it contains only the following sections that relate to pedestrians:

Directions to traffic and to pedestrians and traffic signs

35.Drivers to comply with traffic directions
36.Drivers to comply with traffic signs
37.Directions to pedestrians
Where a constable in uniform is for the time being engaged in the regulation of vehicular traffic in a road, a person on foot who proceeds across or along the carriageway in contravention of a direction to stop given by the constable in the execution of his duty, either to persons on foot or to persons on foot and other traffic, is guilty of an offence.

Duty to give name and address

168.Failure to give, or giving false, name and address in case of reckless or careless or inconsiderate driving or cycling

169.Pedestrian contravening constable’s direction to stop to give name and address

The relevant paragraph in section 36 states:
Drivers to comply with traffic signs
(1)Where a traffic sign, being a sign—
(a)of the prescribed size, colour and type, or
(b)of another character authorised by the Secretary of State under the provisions in that behalf of the [1984 c. 27.] Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984,
has been lawfully placed on or near a road, a person driving or propelling a vehicle who fails to comply with the indication given by the sign is guilty of an offence.

There are some older acts that could be relevant, but in the light of the clarity of section 36.1, I would find it surprising if there is anything further. It seems to me therefore that there is no law requiring pedestrians to follow road signs, only for vehicle drivers or propellers to do so. This would explain why the no pedestrians sign is actually not in the highway code, which I found surprising. Presumably the law does not make this enforceable so it is omitted from the code.
Pink Duck (2020-10-27 09:37:36+00:00): I found in RTRA 1984 Chapter 27, Traffic regulation orders outside Greater London may make order for facilitating: 1(c) "any class of traffic (including pedestrians)"

Norwich City council made a TRO at https://tro.trafficpenaltytribunal.gov.uk/TRO/Norwich/Norwich-City-Council-Bowthorpe-Clover-Hill-Bus-Lanes-Traffic-Regulation-Order-2018.pdf but with statement "no person shall…drive or propel or cause to be driven or propelled any vehicle to enter or proceed".

Highways Code indeed doesn't feature the 'no pedestrians one', with disclaimer stating it only features the most common signs. Though it's there in DfT's know Your Traffic Signs, and is enforceable if desired by authority.

Also definitions from TSRGD 2016 Schedule 1 - Part 2: “bus lane” a traffic lane reserved for— (a) buses; and (b) where indicted on a sign, authorised vehicles, pedal cycles, solo motor cycles or taxis, plus: 
“traffic lane” a part of the carriageway intended for use by vehicles travelling in a particular direction or reserved for use by vehicles of a particular type and separated from other parts of the carriageway by road markings

That's all sufficient to convince me that it is legal to walk there now. I'd still like pedestrian routing to prefer pavements or slightly longer routes to avoid, but that's a separate issue.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 06:29:39+00:00): Hello!

What you think about subclassing shop=trade for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/485753920/history and tagging it as shop=trade trade=survey_equipment ?

Especially as shop=survey is really rare and large chunk of it is from various tagging mistakes
SomeoneElse (2023-03-20 10:23:56+00:00): They're not exclusively trade (they would have been happy to sell to me), although their prices are displayed as ex-vat, so the majority of their customers are trade.
As well as being wrong here, shop=trade isn't great because it doesn't say anything about the type of shop, which other shop tags do.
Thwre will always be a long tail of shops, especially if you consider semicolons.  That's not wrong; it's just describing the world as it is.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 18:02:56+00:00): > They're not exclusively trade (they would have been happy to sell to me)

Why that would be problem? Is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtrade wrong with "A place of business that sells to a particular trade or trades, but normally also retails to normal consumers."

> As well as being wrong here, shop=trade isn't great because it doesn't say anything about the type of shop, which other shop tags do. 

trade=survey_equipment would solve that

> Thwre will always be a long tail of shops, especially if you consider semicolons. 

Though if possible to have shorter list, without negative effects, then it would be nice to achieve
Athalis (2017-04-09 23:00:00+00:00): source ist Bing mit guter knowledge, habe vergessen das vor dem Upload anzupassen.
dgitto (2017-04-10 06:06:02+00:00): benvenuto in OSM. mancava il tag tourism=guest_house.
inoltre la stradina di accesso non credo proprio si chiami "Chiaramonte Gulfi"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-05-05 07:48:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48417098 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some deletions and other odd edits.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
nammala (2017-04-10 04:27:35+00:00): Hi  felipebarreto,

Could you please make sure you don't add parks over the buildings which is not a good practise.

Regards,
nammala
nevw (2017-04-16 08:08:29+00:00): Any good reason you have deleted all recent mapping. I have recorded all those paths personally by gps. They are not concrete paths as you may expect but are dirt paths.
These are expected to be mapped. You should refrain from deleting other peoples mapping unless you know what you are doing.
I intend to revert your changesets and if necessary will contact the data working group if you continue this vandalism.
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-30 13:15:36+00:00): Is this vandalism or a legit name?
SikeMo (2017-05-30 17:09:34+00:00): That one is a bit of a joke as it's a trail on the side of a rock face called the 'white line'. Look for it on YouTube. No sure there is actually any name.
Supaplex (2017-04-10 05:55:20+00:00): What are you adding? Could you explain?
DD1GJ (2017-04-10 08:37:03+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 verursacht Probleme durch suboptimale Speicherung. Mach daher bitte ein Update auf die aktuelle Version 0.7. Vielen Dank

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855
SkyfaR (2017-04-10 09:23:21+00:00): Das würde ich sehr gerne tun, sofern der Maintainer die App im F-Droid Store aktualisiert :) 
Danke aber für den Hinweis dann werde ich soweit erstmal auf das weitere lösen von Aufgaben verzichten bis ein entsprechendes Update rausgebracht wird.
DD1GJ (2017-04-10 08:36:37+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 verursacht Probleme durch suboptimale Speicherung. Mach daher bitte ein Update auf die aktuelle Version 0.7. Vielen Dank

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855
5m4u9 (2017-04-12 04:14:40+00:00): enorme aporte, gracias por mejorar el mapa!

sólo un comentario. hay calles que cambiaste o añadiste "C/" como prefijo, en OSM tratamos de no añadir abreviaciones porque llegan a generar confusión.

para una persona local es entendible C/ = Calle, para un extranjero puede causar confusión. para software de direcciones también.

en general evitar poner abreviaciones a pasajes, calles, avenidas, callejones.

PD: ya hice las correcciones.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
literan (2017-04-10 12:46:55+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship "The tag amenity=place_of_worship can be added in the surrounding area where the religious services are conducted, or only in the building if the area isn't exactly known (together with the key building=*)."  Или на территорию, или на здания ,но не и туда и туда. В любом случае - на территории келий и хозяйственных построек religious services are not conducted, у православных для этого предназначены храмы.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:13:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
manings (2017-04-10 09:11:53+00:00): Hi Benjiel, Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I moved the school node closer to its location based on imagery and made the name to title case.  Really minor edits to make the data better.  Keep on mapping!
manings (2017-04-10 09:18:36+00:00): Changeset here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47615668
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
manings (2017-04-10 09:40:07+00:00): Hi edmundo, thanky ou for contritbuting to OpenStreetMap.  I have removed the tag tourism=hotel in the convenience store and added roads around the neighborhood using Mapbox satellite imagery.  I encourage to add roads names and other features.  Keep on mapping!
manings (2017-04-10 09:41:55+00:00): Changeset is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47616490
Also see it in osmcha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/47616490
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].