piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-06-01 17:34:21+00:00): Up to you... Die kerkgebouwen blijven altijd lastig want je wilt toch dat adres en instelling gekoppeld is.
dw15 (2019-06-01 17:39:43+00:00): Dan laat ik het staan voor als iemand eens het correspondentieadres zoekt. Dank voor de hulp!
eggie (2019-06-01 17:44:47+00:00): In dat geval zou ik het toch onder  note= zetten, want een routeplanner zet iemand anders op het verkeerde been. een adres hoort uniek te zijn.
dw15 (2019-06-01 18:18:55+00:00): Gedaan.
gscholz (2019-06-02 06:27:09+00:00): Hi GabiCu,
your recent changeset have created several errors in the osm database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.62867&lat=-25.22797&zoom=15&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Guido
mavl (2019-06-02 09:03:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок меняет статус дороги с unclassified на residential.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363988640/history  
  
Это не жилая улица. Прежний статус был правильным. Вернул как было. Было бы хорошо, если бы вы прочитали статьи про статусы дорог:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway  
  
Также добавленные вами многочисленные подъезды к дворам не являются "улицами" (дорогами класса residential).  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693927668
mueschel (2019-06-03 08:43:29+00:00): Hi,
you added several ways with a tag "FTRSRC = RiverStream". Could you check that and add a common tag instead?

Thanks
Jan
michael63 (2019-06-01 18:21:40+00:00): These two buildings do not look nice - we try to match the shape of the original as good as we can. Look a little further to the Northwest (north of Milton Rd.) where you can find examples of well-mapped buildings. The imagery is very clear, no problem here. 

As far as your right building is concerned: the dark roof is just a (probably renovated) part of the building. I would map the whole line of houses as one building as it is hard to tell where one ends and the next one begins (unless you have local knowledge about individual houses).
michael63 (2019-06-01 18:08:56+00:00): nombrar un calle si lo sabe el nombre es correcto; pero no nombramos el nodo de un cruzamiento: ¿cual calle tiene ese nombre?
aufachse (2019-06-02 04:21:59+00:00): Hallo Max Maurer,
wurde das Gebäude des Hotels wirklich abgerissen? Dann müsstest Du auch noch den dazugehörenden Knoten löschen.
Max Maurer (2019-06-04 08:02:34+00:00): Oh nein, da ist mir wohl ein folgenschwerer Fehler unterlaufen. Ich wollte eine Dopplung entfernen, weil sowohl das Gebäude auf das Hotel am markt verwiesen hat als auch die separate Node. Ich mache den Änderungssatz rückgängig und prüfe die Änderungen nochmal... 

Danke für den Hinweis!
Max Maurer (2019-06-04 08:12:24+00:00): Ich hatte die building=yes property gelöscht. Daher wohl das problem. Habe sie im changeset #70912898 wieder hinzugefügt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70912898

ich hoffe das Ergebnis passt jetzt. Danke nochmal!
aufachse (2019-06-05 17:59:41+00:00): Alles Gut.
maraf24 (2019-06-04 13:49:14+00:00): Ehm, opis changesetu nie odzwierciedla dokonanych zmian, którymi są wyłącznie auto fixy z iD.
maraf24 (2019-06-04 13:46:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1927067790
maraf24 (2019-06-04 13:47:23+00:00): To jest świadoma zmiana: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6274871946 ?
Bo to są różne banki.
rayleigh1 (2019-06-05 20:35:33+00:00): Huh, nie wiedziałem, że się czymś różnią, tak, to jest w takim wypadku błąd
maraf24 (2019-06-05 20:52:56+00:00): Łatwo rozróżnić po szyldach, bo Consumer ma białe tło, a nie czerwone.
rayleigh1 (2019-06-08 17:40:10+00:00): Dzięki za informacje
eggie (2019-06-01 19:56:10+00:00): Wellicht wilde de voorgaande mapper twee watertappunten toevoegen en is dat niet goed gegaan. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69429381
Je zou het hem kunnen vragen.
Gr eggie
rayleigh1 (2019-06-02 15:16:42+00:00): Możliwe błędne zmiany tagowania w przypadku nodes: entrance oraz crossing, czy ktoś bardziej doświadczony mógłby je odwrócić dla tych obiektów?
eggie (2019-06-01 18:53:02+00:00): Top!

Begraafplaats ligt nu als inner in een multipolygoonrelatie. 
landuse=forest lijkt weg, maar staat op de outerrelatie. 
Rendering duurt even..
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2019-12-04 09:00:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77913960, 77919406, 77910048, 77905960 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
maraf24 (2019-06-01 21:47:35+00:00): 1. Not exact position. Moved.
2. Description used as name. Fixed.
3. No correct tag used - this is not memorial. Fixed.
Burkhard2019 (2019-06-02 08:45:21+00:00): Thank you! Your right. Are there some gravestones?
maraf24 (2019-06-03 21:36:29+00:00): I wasn't there, by it is highly possible there are some visible tombstones.
Constable (2019-06-03 06:47:39+00:00): Ciao, in riferimento a questo tratto
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/276269354
a mio modo di vedere mtb:scale=0 era corretto, è un sentiero su erba, pendenza lieve e nessun ostacolo.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:mtb:scale?uselang=it#mtb:scale.3D0-6

Cosa ne pensi?
grazie, ciao!
Dingo67 (2019-06-03 10:38:45+00:00): L'ho modificato in Scale=0 dopo averlo percorso personalmente la scorsa domenica (quando il giro ha fatto il Ghisallo e Sormano). Premetto che ho buona tecnica in discesa e gambe che mi hanno sempre permesso di fare rampe anche sopra il 30%. Complice il fatto che l'erba era anche umida mi sono dovuto arrendere e spingerla a mano in salita, ma comunque ad occhio la pendenza era sempre abbondantemente sopra il 20%. In discesa ho ringraziato il reggisella telescopico e gli ottimi freni che monto, ma ho faticato non poco a governare la bici sopratutto in alcuni tratti smossi o scavati. Secondo me non mi pare il caso di consigliarla a chi non possiede abilità di guida (come suggerisce Scale=0).

Comunque se vuoi correggi il TAG per me non ci sono problemi.
Dingo67 (2019-06-03 10:39:51+00:00): Scusa all'inizio intendevo Scale=1
Constable (2019-06-04 06:40:02+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la risposta. Hai ragione, mi ero confuso, io facevo riferimento a questo tratto http://bit.ly/2JXvTc3
Come non detto quindi, pardon
Grazie!
RicoElectrico (2019-06-01 21:18:45+00:00): Hi, as you described, that name was functional until 1945. Therefore it belongs to old_name:de instead of name:de.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name
Burkhard2019 (2019-06-02 09:00:09+00:00): Hello, 
maybe your right. I miss some clear rules in this case. I'm a genealogist and my ancestors are coming from this area and it would be very useful to have a bilingual map with first polish name and second the historical german name, this you can find under www.openstreetmap.de. You can find  this bilingual names par example very often in Silesia. In the former polish villages of the Ukraina, they use also "name:pl=...", so I think it's more used generally than "old_name". Do you live in this area?
aceman444 (2020-04-26 12:24:48+00:00): Bez opisnych nazvov prosim. Ze je to vyhliadkova veza ste uz vyjadrili znackou tower:type=observation, nie je potrebne to davat do nazvu. Prinosnejsie by bolo zadat skutocny nazov, pripadne, ze je to verejne nepristupne (javi sa to byt uzavrete na sukromnom pozemku). A samozrejme umiestnit ju na spravne miesto, nie 10 metrov vedla. Dakujem
Kartenziegel (2019-06-27 14:49:06+00:00): Please don't automatically retag landuses.
Baloo Uriza (2019-06-07 02:01:05+00:00): Not quite sure what you were going for here, this clearly is not a park.  Can you clarify?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70841923
viloan (2019-06-01 19:08:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
maraf24 (2019-06-04 14:05:00+00:00): Te znaczniki nie są przestarzałe, to się tylko twórcom iD tak wydaje.
puchaczowsky (2019-06-05 19:15:50+00:00): A co szkodzi zaktualizować, jeżeli jest taka możliwość? Im więcej szczegółów tym lepiej 🤔
maraf24 (2019-06-06 18:16:56+00:00): Ale co zaktualizować, skoro znaczniki są prawidłowe i aktualne? Ich zmiana na inną wersję nie powoduje też powstania bardziej szczegółowej mapy.
puchaczowsky (2019-06-06 18:35:31+00:00): Co do szczegółowości samej mapy to się zgadzam. Tak naprawdę ta niby "aktualizacja znaczników" nie usuwa poprzednich znaczników, tylko dodaje 1 nowy odnośnie dokładnego typu zbiornika.
maraf24 (2019-06-08 19:26:08+00:00): Niezupełnie. Zastępują jeden tag jego odpowiednikiem dwutagowym.
Tutaj bez znaczenia, ale taki tag landuse=basin jest zmieniane na natural=water, czego automatycznie robić nie wolno, bo landuse=basin niekoniecznie musi mieć w sobie wodę.
eggie (2019-06-01 19:48:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
bigopenmac (2019-11-27 10:08:01+00:00): Что означает man_made=pole ?
не нахожу в вики такой комбинации.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6515458486/history
shrddr (2021-06-20 13:49:49+00:00): столб непонятного назначения. в данном случае вероятно поддерживает троллейбусные провода, но такого тега-то точно нет
eggie (2019-06-01 19:33:07+00:00): Tip: Probeer als het even kan op de adresnode bij te taggen. Niet nog een keer een adresnode aanmaken svp.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-01 19:42:58+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode
geow (2019-06-02 20:33:30+00:00): Kutul, this looks great :-)
Maybe you know this QA tool:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70842508
Rbanick (2019-06-03 05:56:59+00:00): Hi geow -- thanks for the great feedback throughout, it's really appreciated. Kutul is under a deadline this week but I'll teach her to upload GPS traces next, as well as do a general debrief so future edits are smooth.

I haven't forgotten about the organized editing guidelines either. I am meeting some key people in the Nepali community this week and will discuss this with them, after which time I'll update the wiki.
geow (2019-06-03 22:10:50+00:00): Hi all, thanks for improving the data in Nepal, especially quality gps tracks are helpful for tracing and to correct misaligned/unrectified aerial imagery.

>some key people in the Nepali community this week 

Hmm, is there an active community in Nepal? To my impression with an average of 10-15 active mappers/day and mostly < 2500 created nodes/day the community seems kind of dormant. That said your activities are more than welcome. :-)

Cheers

PS: a possible source for gps data are the clients and guides of trekking companies, maybe someone (KLL?) should train them to collect and contribute data. Today everyone on a trek brings smartphones, Garmins and mobile solar panels.
Rbanick (2019-06-04 03:56:37+00:00): Yeah I'm meeting with KLL. In practice they stand in for the community -- not because they *are* the community (they wouldn't say so) but because they're in touch with most of it. It's a small, poor country whose brightest tech minds tend to go abroad for way higher wages and better education; community building is tough.

Trekkers already provide a lot of the best data :-). The main trekking routes are actually in good (not perfect) shape. It's the obscure routes or areas like this, where foreigners don't go, that are more problematic. Hence our keen interest to push data up...if we don't do it, it will be a while before someone else does. 

Agreed it would be great to get traces from trekkers though. I am talking to some of the ultra marathon outdoors types here as they're a bit easier to connect with and they usually carry GPS.
eggie (2019-06-01 19:51:21+00:00): Dag Hde Witte.. Kijk even in de wiki hoe een zwembad te taggen. Alleen een naam heeft geen zin.
MVG,
Eggie
freebeer (2019-08-30 03:11:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73903589 where the changeset comment is: both already mapped four years in far more likely locations.  why does maps.me even allow creating such a widely abused item that really cannot be mapped as a point...
eggie (2019-06-01 19:52:16+00:00): Niet ergens op het gebouw?
Hdewitte5 (2019-06-03 11:19:33+00:00): 't Staat op hun terras (waar ik was :-)). 
Verzet ik dit best (en hoe doe ik dat?).
eggie (2019-06-03 11:35:18+00:00): Dag HdeWitte.. Wanneer die RestoBar buiten op het terras is heb je het uiteraard goed gemapt. Dan zo laten. 
Wanneer je de node evt. wil verplaatsen kun je 'm beetpakken met de linker muisknop en verslepen.

Succes,
Eggie
muralito (2019-06-02 17:19:20+00:00): Hola. Esto ya estaba mapeado, y no esta correcto duplicar los elementos.
rayleigh1 (2019-06-02 15:16:22+00:00): Możliwe błędne zmiany tagowania w przypadku nodes: entrance oraz crossing, czy ktoś bardziej doświadczony mógłby je odwrócić dla tych obiektów?
grin (2019-06-05 11:49:00+00:00): Ez a sugárút kicsit túlzás. Egyrészt ott nincs út, másrészt ezt a nevet kétlem, hogy az önkormányzat adta neki. Mi lenne az adatok forrása?
rayleigh1 (2019-06-02 15:15:37+00:00): Możliwe błędne zmiany tagowania w przypadku nodes: entrance oraz crossing, czy ktoś bardziej doświadczony mógłby je odwrócić dla tych obiektów?
rayleigh1 (2019-06-02 15:15:55+00:00): Możliwe błędne zmiany tagowania w przypadku nodes: entrance oraz crossing, czy ktoś bardziej doświadczony mógłby je odwrócić dla tych obiektów?
rayleigh1 (2019-06-02 15:15:18+00:00): Możliwe błędne zmiany tagowania w przypadku nodes: entrance oraz crossing, czy ktoś bardziej doświadczony mógłby je odwrócić dla tych obiektów?
eggie (2019-06-01 22:14:50+00:00): Beste  .. welk hoog uitkijkpunt mag hier dan zijn?.. en wat is dan het uitzicht?
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2019-06-02 09:40:01+00:00): Deer CreepjeTegraze,
This is not the right way to do this.
You can add the name to the existing playground. Besides the name will not render on the map without the right tags.
So I add the name to the playground and remove the nonexisting viewpoint.
Please read the wiki before making your changes:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
rayleigh1 (2019-06-02 15:15:04+00:00): Możliwe błędne zmiany tagowania w przypadku nodes: entrance oraz crossing, czy ktoś bardziej doświadczony mógłby je odwrócić dla tych obiektów?
mueschel (2019-06-04 08:05:58+00:00): Hi,
please watch out for the correct spelling of tags. You added 40 objects with the tag "bildigue=heste". I think this should be "building=hut". 
Could you have a look and fix these?

Thanks!
rayleigh1 (2019-06-02 15:14:46+00:00): Możliwe błędne zmiany tagowania w przypadku nodes: entrance oraz crossing, czy ktoś bardziej doświadczony mógłby je odwrócić dla tych obiektów?
Counterfeit2 (2019-06-03 12:26:50+00:00): Дорога ужасная, я бы не хотел, чтобы меня карта вела именно там.
ArtemVN (2019-06-03 13:26:49+00:00): Какая бы дорога ни была, мы руководствуемся фактами, а не своим отношением к качеству покрытия. А факт таков, что там есть соединение с улицей Воинов-Интернационалистов. Убедитесь в этом сами: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/8zs4e1Le2ehv7o7lRk5i1g
Kartenziegel (2019-06-01 20:56:18+00:00): Update your changeset comment. This is no longer Venezuela ;)
rayleigh1 (2019-06-02 15:14:30+00:00): Możliwe błędne zmiany tagowania w przypadku nodes: entrance oraz crossing, czy ktoś bardziej doświadczony mógłby je odwrócić dla tych obiektów?
maraf24 (2019-06-02 21:35:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409779391
viloan (2019-06-01 21:01:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
rayleigh1 (2019-06-02 15:14:13+00:00): Możliwe błędne zmiany tagowania w przypadku nodes: entrance oraz crossing, czy ktoś bardziej doświadczony mógłby je odwrócić dla tych obiektów?
maraf24 (2019-06-02 20:58:12+00:00): Tu jest barrier=kerb dodane do przejść dla pieszych. Tak, to jest problem.
barrier=entrance zmienione w  entrance=yes. Czy to jest problem, nie wiem.
rayleigh1 (2019-06-02 15:13:57+00:00): Możliwe błędne zmiany tagowania w przypadku nodes: entrance oraz crossing, czy ktoś bardziej doświadczony mógłby je odwrócić dla tych obiektów?
maraf24 (2019-06-02 20:55:56+00:00): Tutaj nie ma nic z entrance ani crossing.
Mógłbyś napisać jak zmieniane jest entrance? Tego jeszcze nie zaobserwowałem.
Co do crossing=zebra zmieniane w crossing=marked, to w Polsce chyba tylko zebry występują, więc utrafa informacji jest pozorna.
François2 (2019-06-16 14:32:25+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour l'ajout que j'avais vu passer dans le bulletin municipal. 
Dans celui ci, l'orthographe était "Crêpes and Caux" (sans le &). Vous confirmez ?
Sosha1996 (2019-06-03 07:57:03+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم، اما لطفا در کامنت چنجست یک توضحی در مورد تغییراتی که دادید بنویسید.
با تشکر.
لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments
kiaraSh-Q (2019-06-03 10:23:07+00:00): گجلزدفمرح دت وای.مب ملیسد زامکغ ولسذح
maraf24 (2019-06-02 20:49:38+00:00): Te aktualizacje są kompletnie zbędne, nie wnoszą one nic nowego do mapy.
John Grubb (2019-06-03 19:12:20+00:00): Are we sure about this addressing? addr:village is not defined in the Wiki, which also defines addr:country as being the two-letter nation code (in this case GB) and not the common name of the nation or province within. Other settlements use addr:city to hold the settlement name and not the post town.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
John Grubb (2019-06-11 21:41:42+00:00): I've put addr:village forward for adoption:-

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:addr#Key_addr:village_introduced
UKChris (2019-06-22 14:45:40+00:00): Thank you for pointing out the correct two-letter nation code usage for addr:country John.
John Grubb (2019-06-22 21:39:35+00:00): I think we [OSM mappers] need to go through this region and implement the addr:village tag in order to correct the wrong usage (by wiki definition) of addr:place. Don't do Cotford St. Luke yet, though, as I'm using it as an illustrative example in the OSM Wiki discussion to get addr:village implemented as a formal tag.
UKChris (2019-06-23 20:22:11+00:00): I'll leave Cotford St. Luke as it is :) I'm somewhat surprised addr:village isn't better documented, as it's currently an autocomplete option when using the iD editor, and is what lead me to use it as the default in place of addr:place.
John Grubb (2019-06-23 20:52:02+00:00): Addr:village definitely needs to move through to the tag definitions on the key=addr page.
Glassman (2019-06-02 00:29:56+00:00): I fixed the trail extension - it was untagged.
Rainero (2019-06-06 18:23:23+00:00): Hallo Ruth21,

was, mitten in Wolnzach, im Nabel des Welthopfenanbaus, wird ein Biergarten durch ein Wohnhaus ersetzt? Wer genehmigt denn sowas?

Du hast um Überprüfung des Edits gebeten, das will ich gerne tun.
Du hast aus dem Umriß des Biergartens ein Gebäude gemacht, aber stimmt das wirklich so? Das Luftbild, das auch im iD-Editor hinterlegt ist, stammt vom 2.7.2018 und zeigt ein Gebäude, das kleiner ist als der ehemalige Biergarten.
Man müßte also den Biergarten löschen und das Gebäude neu einzeichnen. Allerdings sind die Gebäude entlang der Klosterstraße auch recht ungenau gezeichnet, so daß da etwas mehr zu tun ist. Den Zufahrtsweg von der Klosterstraße würde ich bei der Gelegenheit auch einzeichnen. Ist der nur für Anlieger?

Willst du es selbst versuchen oder soll ich helfen?

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
mueschel (2019-06-02 10:46:39+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded several objects with strange tags, could you check that?
edifc_dcl=edificio
edifc_dsot=Non Sotterraneo
edifc_dst0=In Esercizio
edifc_dty=Edificio Rurale
edifc_duso=Agricolo
edifc_id=RT0201020000070530


http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JBw
Vinny's Workshop (2026-03-26 19:04:13+00:00): Hi, Skybunny. I am a fairly new mapper in the OSM community, and I am looking to map a feature very similar to what you have right here, the Paulding Forest Wildlife Management Area in Paulding and Polk counties in Georgia. How did you add this feature and how might I add my own?
Skybunny (2026-03-28 21:01:45+00:00): I believe what I did is got publicly sourced .gpx (shape) files and imported using JOSM. Once I had those, then if the boundary lines obviously were meant to be identical to another (a state/county/other WMA), I'd unify the lines and have them use multiple relations per line. Hope this helps!
philam48 (2020-07-22 22:52:00+00:00): Hi there, you may recall some years ago that we had a discussion about not using the railway=station tag on disused/abandoned stations. I can see that this has happened again, so just a friendly reminder to please use the appropriate tag (e.g. railway:historic=station) instead. Thanks.
Polyglot (2020-08-24 08:47:35+00:00): Is the name of this tunnel really "Creepy Tunnel"? Sounds more like a description.
Eebie (2020-08-26 22:18:58+00:00): Creepy tunnel is probably not the official name but it is the name used on the map and documentation made by the group that made and promote the hiking roundtrip in Charleroi. See https://cheminsdesterrils.be/
geowas (2019-09-03 06:06:29+00:00): Hi norD79.
You moved the Turkish-Armenian border from where the old riverbed goes to the east shore of the lake. AFAIK the old position was correct (also Google and Yandex display it in the middle of the lake). What information was your change based on? Thank you.
norD79 (2019-09-03 12:43:34+00:00): Hello. The access to the lake is closed to armenian citizens, except small part. I went to that lake and looked to the border fence and towers. I also lookes at google and yandex maps. But there can be error also. I am not sure. May be correct position of the border at the center of the lake, but border fence is at my line. I think we should display real situation of geographical and administrative objects in OSM. Thank you for your attention.
geowas (2019-09-03 13:41:57+00:00): Hi norD79. Then you have a prohibited area, but that doesn't mean it's not part of Armenia. So the fence keeps you as a regular person away from the border (I assume some soldiers can go there), but it is not the border. The area behind the fence could be mapped as no-go zone, but the fence is not the country border. Otherwise we will have blank areas between many countries. Can you please revert to the old position.