piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gazer75 (2019-04-15 10:29:29+00:00): 22kV lines are minor and normally poles. Anything below 45kV really is. There are exceptions for tower on minor line though: https://goo.gl/maps/Nf9amTyPcMx
Please read the wiki page for power infrastructure in Norway: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Norway/Norwegian_Infrastructure_networks
st3inar (2022-05-11 21:15:40+00:00): Thank you for the comment, I have updated the mapping to minor_line.
AndriesWijma (2019-04-11 14:57:34+00:00): I've deleted this unspecified and randomly or badly placed node with office=lawyer. Please improve the quality of your contributions.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-30 15:39:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68701100 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some childish admin level changes in Europe.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2631.
eggie (2019-03-30 15:13:54+00:00): Dag Leander. Het lijkt er op dat je gewoon een highway op een highway hebt geplakt. 
(duplicated way) De weg onder je brug heb ik verwijderd
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-30 15:39:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68701100 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some childish admin level changes in Europe.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2631.
GBAB (2020-06-22 06:21:28+00:00): Kedves János!
Ezek biztosan virágüzletek?
Üdv: Gábor
GeorgeKaplan (2020-12-31 11:47:20+00:00): Bonjour,

Sur l'objet node 6372381887, que voulez-vous dire avec le tag "tunnel=State, Ministry" ?
Minh Nguyen (2019-07-23 23:44:03+00:00): Thanks for these changes. By the way, when you’re mapping in Ohio, please consider using the OSIP 6in layer wherever it’s available. It’s more up-to-date than Mapbox imagery and at least as clear and well-aligned.
dhaird (2019-07-25 12:19:36+00:00): Hi Minh Nguyen,

Thanks a lot for your suggestions. Will follow this going forward and ensure the message is passed on to my team as well.
Looking forward to learning more from you.
Regards,
Dhaird
berndw (2019-03-31 09:41:36+00:00): Danke ;-)
François2 (2019-03-30 18:05:02+00:00): Beau boulot !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-30 15:39:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 68698959, 68699012, 68699494, 68699561.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:13:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
ap_ (2019-03-30 15:50:55+00:00): Поменялся владелец здания.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:13:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2019-05-09 21:11:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
romanh (2019-04-01 16:09:54+00:00): Source natürlich Survey (mit dem eBike)
Bootprint (2019-04-02 21:23:33+00:00): I'm pretty sure the proper syntax for proposed high is highway=proposed, proposed=secondary. Currently with the set as proposed=yes it is rendered and appears to be usable.
user_5359 (2019-03-31 14:54:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Hint: an address ist describe with addr:housenumber and addr:street. It is also a good idea to mark the new road with (from a current aerial image or a GPS track recorded with the phone)
gabro00 (2019-03-30 18:45:15+00:00): Úgy tűnik igen :)
https://www.kozterkep.hu/~/2662/Assisi_Szent_Ferenc_es_Paduai_Szent_Antal_Szeged.html
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:38:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
iriman (2019-05-18 15:13:40+00:00): نقشه فقط باید واقعیت روی زمین را منعکس کند. اعتراض مدنی خود را از راهش پیگیری کنید. مربوط به 
way/680587892
Mojimichael (2019-05-18 15:34:18+00:00): دوست عزیز من خودم کسی بودم که این رو اطلاع دادم من ترسیم نکردم فقط چون رو ویرایشش کلید کردم ایدی منو بالا میاره بعنوان اخرین وایرایش کننده
مطمئنا من انقلاب مدنی ام هم از راهای دیگه پیگیری میکنم ک صدام برسه ن اینجا😐
abakus_uploader (2019-03-30 23:30:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
marc__marc (2024-09-11 10:21:03+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/636455407
what's the meaning of "as" for a date in surface_survey=as ?
Rakkka (2024-01-03 09:12:42+00:00): 　tourism=apartment は、taginfoによるとリゾートマンションとなっていますが、ガーデン南山手1号棟などは普通のマンションではないでしょうか？
　building=apartment が適切に思えますがいかがでしょうか。
SomeoneElse (2019-04-05 09:52:53+00:00): Hello Amal Sarman,
Looking at the imagery behind 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680593399
it doesn't look like a triangular tree row to me at all.   Please only add things to OSM that actually exist in the real world.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2019-04-05 09:53:24+00:00): مرحبا امل سرمان
النظر إلى الصور وراءها
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680593399
لا يبدو مثل صف شجرة الثلاثي بالنسبة لي على الإطلاق. يرجى فقط إضافة أشياء إلى OSM الموجودة بالفعل في العالم الحقيقي.
تحياتي الحارة،
أندي تاونسند ، بالنيابة عن مجموعة عمل بيانات OSM.
tux67 (2019-03-31 09:40:03+00:00): Hallo Bratan0101,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Die von dir durchgeführten Änderungen waren so nicht korrekt . Du hattest "Wappen" als Punkt eines Weges gemappt, was so nicht zulässig ist (Habe ich erstmal gefixt und als Punkt neben die Straße gelegt).
Ich würde dich bitten, sich vor weiteren Änderungen etwas einzulesen. Wenn es sich um eine moderne Tafel handelt, dann ist historic=memorial  - wenn ich deine changesetbeschreibung richtig lese - nicht das richtige Tag. 
Wenn es wirklich alt ist, wäre es eher sowas https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic%3Dboundary_stone als ein memorial 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:historic
Bei einem modernen Schild wäre das eher toursim=information und information=guidepost
Bitte auch nie das Name Feld verwenden um das Objekt zu beschreiben. Da kommt nur der Name rein, wenn das Objekt einen Namen hat. Sonst description o.ä.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst, aber gib auch immer eine Quelle an (diese muß mit der OSM Lizenz vereinbar sein).
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
tux67 (2019-03-31 10:03:21+00:00): P.S.: Dein Changeset Kommentar scheint copy & Paste aus der Wikipedia. Grundätzlich sei Vorsicht bei der Kopie aus anderen Werken angemahnt. Es wäre gut, wenn du (selbstgemachte) Bilder der Tafeln/Schilder zur Verfügung stellen könntest.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68705134
Minh Nguyen (2019-05-25 18:40:33+00:00): Hi, thanks for helping to keep this area up to date. Unfortunately, this changeset broke several turn restrictions and turn lane data along several roads. Where turn lane tags are used, please start ramps and turn channels at the end of the turn lane. Sometimes this may result in less smooth geometry at the highest zoom levels, but this is the only way to preserve data necessary for proper routing.
Greg_Rose (2019-05-08 17:12:26+00:00): Hi there - you have created a river and corresponding relation for the Rio Maria, where the Rio Savane should be. Do you have info on the renaming of the river, or is this just a tributary that was accidentally extended too far? Thanks
majkaz (2019-04-01 13:18:49+00:00): Ahoj, můžeš prosím tě ještě kolem těch rybníků naházet správně můstky/propustky na těch kříženích cest a potoků? Vyhazuje to tam chyby. Díky, Majka.
osmiz (2019-04-04 20:32:53+00:00): Ahoj Majko, zkusil jsem tunnel=culvert, dává to spíš smysl než bridge, akorát nevím, jak to bude vypadat. Až to uvidím, dodělám to i dál. 
K té cestě https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530282651 , je nějaký zvláštní důvod, proč je to "service"? Nepříjemné je, že "service" mizí už při zoomu 15 zatímco "track" (i horší grade) až při 12. 
Milan
majkaz (2019-04-05 08:36:11+00:00): Řekla bych, že jsem to brala jako příjezdovou cestu do té zahrádkářské kolonie, jiný důvod to mít nebude. Úplně v pohodě se to celé za polní cestu může přeznačit. Tady je to asi jen o úhlu pohledu, totéž na druhé straně - Hůlkova Stráň.
Jen kvůli tomu zobrazení bych to nepřeznačovala, ale tady je fakt asi lepší to dát jako track.
Abdusalam ALKURDI (2019-03-30 20:56:47+00:00): amigo
eggie (2019-03-30 19:25:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
FransWillem (2019-04-02 15:47:43+00:00): Hi, Thanks for mapping here. A request. Please be sure not to connect nodes of a highway you are mapping to the node of buildings. I noticed several occasions you did so.
Thanks and keep mapping
Glassman (2019-03-30 20:13:42+00:00): Thanks for the improvement. I did go ahead and remove the building the road now goes through and slightly modify the new road to match what King County iMap has.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68706935
SomeoneElse (2019-03-30 19:28:39+00:00): Hello - can you reply to the comments at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7160908 ?  To do that, click the changeset link, type in the box and press the "comment" button.
SomeoneElse (2019-03-30 19:28:56+00:00): Hola, ¿puede responder a los comentarios en http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=7160908? Para hacer eso, haga clic en el enlace de conjunto de cambios, escriba el cuadro y presione el botón "comentar".
Alvarado2510 (2019-04-17 01:00:15+00:00): Buenas noches, realice un recorrido con OSMtrack, lo comparti, en mi perfil.
Haace 3 anos aproximadamente, se construyo esta plaza, ubicada en David Sur, la imgen aerea de Bing, tiene 5 anos de retraso, por lo cual ustedes no le apreciasn en el editor, pero yo garntizo su existencia.
Alvarado2510 (2019-04-17 01:23:57+00:00): el edificio del area omercial se llama Plaza La Riviera, donde se encuentran distintos negocios.
L'imaginaire (2019-03-30 22:30:16+00:00): Een frituur duiden we aan met de tags amenity=fast_food en cuisine=friture
Ik heb dit aangepast.

Zie https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/HwF voor een overzichtje van de in OSM gemapte frituren in Vlaanderen.
joost schouppe (2020-04-27 10:07:21+00:00): Frituur Retro is toch net gesloten?
srviver (2020-04-28 18:32:01+00:00): Ik had dit vorig jaar aangemaakt, maar het is inderdaad perfect mogelijk dat ze net gesloten zijn... Toch weet ik dit niet zeker. Het is namelijk al een tijdje geleden dat ik er gepasseerd/geweest ben.
Frans S (2019-04-01 17:14:30+00:00): Hi,  Thank you for mapping.  A remark. You map a ford as a piece of road. 
You should map a ford as 1 node where you connect the node of the waterway and the highway. On that node you can put the tag ford=yes
Best regards
Luzandro (2019-04-01 05:30:03+00:00): Hallo Stanislaw,

diese Turn Restriction hier sieht etwas eigenartig aus: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9373243#map=19/48.07080/16.32976
da in den OSM-Daten sowieso keine Abzweigung existiert und demnach auch kein "to" angegeben werden kann. Wenn die Verbindung aus der anderen Richtung (oder für Fußgänger/Radfahrer) existiert, sollte man diese wohl ergänzen.

LG Andreas
Luzandro (2019-04-01 05:39:47+00:00): ps: wenn die einzige erlaubte Richtung nach links ist, könnte man alternativ auch die Relation auf only_left_turn ändern, damit sie zumindest vollständig definiert ist, aber bei no_straight_on wäre prinzipiell auch ein Rechtsabbiegen erlaubt.
stanislaw_s (2019-04-02 05:39:20+00:00): Hallo Andreas, 

als ich diese 'Turn Restriction' hinzufügte, gab es ein kurzer Verbindungsweg geradeaus auf den OSM-Karten, der derzeit geschlossen ist, daher habe ich diese Restriction zuerst eingeführt, aber dann habe ich mich entschlossen, dieses Verbindungsweg vollständig zu entfernen (da dies im Grunde genommen kein Weg, sondern nur ein Stück von Asphalt ist), habe jedoch nicht gemerkt, dass diese Restriction nicht automatisch gelöscht wurde. Ich habe es schon korrigiert. Vielen Dank, dass du darauf aufmerksam gemacht hast. Diese verbleibende Restriction hatte zwar keine Auswirkungen auf das Routing, aber ich werde in Zukunft besser aufpassen.

LG Stanislaw
Sanniu (2019-05-30 12:14:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680608097 miss tags, can you add them please?
zstadler (2020-02-23 13:13:13+00:00): Hello BMM994,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680608097 was added in this edit, but it has no tags. Is this a mistake or an incomplete mapping?
skyper (2020-01-22 14:20:57+00:00): Hey

Kannst Du bitte nicht nur die Namen der Firma an die Gebäude eintragen, sondern auch was das ist. Siehe z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329032034

Danke und Grüße skyper
raito (2019-03-31 10:09:36+00:00): Hi, take a look here: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=108.98679&lat=-7.54050&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Last night I fixed 3 of these, but today 2 new appear. Could you maybe look into your editing methods so you can improve it and not create these errors? I am commenting to make sure you know you're making this errors, in hope that you can reduce it at least, so there is less for me to fix. I like to keep the whole map clean of errors. Thanks
pittrichimica (2019-03-31 20:57:43+00:00): Good evening,
thanks for your comment. Here´s a short background information.
The waterways were created a few months ago by another user, who appears to have used some robot software. When checking these waterways with keepright.at,
I found hundreds of errors of the type "intersections without junctions". Please see also https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=14&lat=-7.5851&lon=108.9270 for a bigger picture.
When loading into the editor, I saw that the "rivers" in this region not only
consist of many short snippets, which is itself not a problem, but that these
snippets are often not connected. This not only applies to the waterways but
also to many roads. As a result, no routing program can use these roads, although everything is superficially fine.
I wonder whether you also checked this...? The map has not been by any means clean of errors before I started working on it - several rivers have been created twice, and the bits and pieces
cross each other, which is a big mess.
I saw this and decided to try some clean-up, at least in some regions.
The new conflicts see to stem from that connecting snippets sometimes creates
duplicate connection points, which are not well visible in either Potlatch or
iD. I´ll try to keep an eye on that but it´s nasty because one has to delete
points.
Result: it is always a good idea to use more than one checking tool and base
the overall judgment on the *total* number of map errors - does it go down or up?
Let´s try together for the best result.
Best regards
raito (2019-04-01 01:25:45+00:00): Good morning! Sorry, I did not look much into it. I use only mostly Osminspector to detect few specific errors, sometimes Osmose. It is still overwhelming sometimes. I usually use Osmcha to see what happened in a changeset visually, but it has been having trouble loading changesets recently. 

Good to hear you're actually fixing more errors than making them. Keep it up. I'll just help fix the small ones you miss. Cheers!
Frans S (2019-04-02 16:59:08+00:00): Hi.  I reviewed your mappings.  Rather good and precise. Good judgement about tagging highways. Don't forget to square rectangular buildings with the S key.
Thanks and keep mapping
Lex legis (2019-04-01 09:42:01+00:00): Gradirei sapere la località su che mappa (fonte?) si trova, visto che sulle mappe Tabacco vi è solo l'altura.
Lex legis (2019-04-01 09:43:41+00:00): La Carta Tecnica regionale FVG non è ammissibile come fonte da regolamento OSM
damjang (2019-04-01 09:57:11+00:00): La carta tecnica regionale come gli altri dati regionali sono stati autorizzati appositamente dalla regione per l'utilizzo in osm (abbiamo importato i building, i numeri civici, i fiumi ed anche altro). Invece direi che per le Tabacco non possiamo usarle per osm, perché protette da copyright (almeno penso). Per quello che riguarda la località è conoscenza locale. Difatti localmente viene quasi sempre usato il nome per la zona e non per l'altura (anche in altri casi).
Lex legis (2019-04-01 10:02:57+00:00): OK, ti credo, ma andrebbe segnalato all'utente "Iuschi" che ha avuto modi di scrivermi poco tempo fa il seguente:
Hi Lex legis,

the site regione.fvg.it not allows use of there maps for commercial use. 
http://www.regione.fvg.it/rafvg/cms/RAFVG/notaInformativa/ 
So this map is not allowed as source in OSM. 
For this I revert this changeset.

Please not copy data from incompattible sources, and check copyright of the websites before adding data to OSM.

regards 
luschi

che le carte FVG possono venir utilizzate (mie modifiche ai corsi d'acqua delle colline attorno al Monte Calvario di Gorizia secondo tali mappe sono state cancellate). Vorrei capire perché quando le applico io vengo bloccato e quando le applica un'latra persona (oggi tu, domani un altro) va bene.
damjang (2019-04-01 11:42:51+00:00): Scusa, non avevo visto quel commento e neanche il changeset. Mi dai direttamente il numero di changeset senza che vada a cercarmelo, così gli rispondo?
Lex legis (2019-04-01 12:00:23+00:00): Ecco qua
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66473155

Grazie :)
viloan (2019-03-30 20:55:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
rivermont (2019-08-16 21:28:11+00:00): Hi,
Is this an inn, a bar, or a pub? Please check the wiki pages for amenity=bar and amenity=pub and change this to whichever is more correct. Tagging for things is based on what it is, not what it will be displayed as.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Thanks
eggthethrone (2019-08-19 13:46:33+00:00): After reading through the descriptions for both bar and pub it appears this one would best fit as a pub. Thanks for the heads up.
viloan (2019-03-30 21:02:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Frans S (2019-04-05 09:02:42+00:00): Hello maawoo Thanks for mapping here.
A request. Please square each rectangular building after you have mapped it. Use the S key in iDeditor. Take care not to overlap buildings.
Best regards and keep mapping.
maawoo (2019-04-05 20:05:03+00:00): Hi Frans, I know about squaring with the S key and do it every time I map a building. I also try to correct all the buildings mapped before me, but must have missed some in this case. Regards, Marco
Chenshi (2019-03-30 21:33:14+00:00): Hinweis: war Änderungssatz: 68240685, problematische daten wurden weggelassen.
mueschel (2019-04-08 12:19:21+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of this rectangle?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680619997

Thanks!
stevea (2019-04-08 17:27:21+00:00): Fixed with better tagging, including a source tag (which I thought I put on the changeset, but I didn't, as this "snuck in").

It is about 16 hectares of Land Trust-protected land and now is tagged boundary=protected_area + protect_class=7.

So that I might better find any others like this that might exist, may I ask:  how did you discover it?

-Steve
mueschel (2019-04-08 17:30:37+00:00): Hi Steve,
you used a strange tag "MNG_AGENCY_TYP" that was not used before. I'm checking the keys in the database for obvious errors based on the list of tags from TagInfo:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm

I still have to remarks:
"ACRES" should not be in the tags - the area can easily be calculated from the geometry itself.
You set "access=no" - what does that mean? It looks like some public roads pass through the area.

Jan