piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-07-20 15:55:02+00:00): Hello, why you maded these changes?
ALL G-type roads (inclusive G37 should to be =secondary. If you don't know nothing about road classifications in Moldova, please don't make these changes without discussion with moldovan OSM community.
berms (2020-07-20 17:38:10+00:00): Hello, thank you for reaching out. Although I have not edited in Moldova for over a year, I have been made aware of this information and will be sure to discuss any future editing with the Moldovan OSM community. I appreciate your valuable input and willingness to help.
santamariense (2019-01-18 19:42:15+00:00): Só uma correção. Este objeto em vermelho na imagem ( https://i.imgur.com/c5ibPXN.png ) foi deletado, porém ele não está(va) errado. Ele representa(va) a calçada, que pode ser mapeado em separado ao eixo da rua sem problemas.
Eu anotei para restaurar o objeto, mas caso você mesmo queira (aprender a) fazer, no JOSM isso é possível. Menu Arquivo > "Retornar objetos apagados..." - Como o objeto a ser apagado é https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555714636, o valor que vai lá é w555714636 . "w" por causa do "way". Se fosse "relation" seria "r" e se fosse "node" seria "n".
Uma dica quanto ao mapeamento das quadras é que o limite delas não seria o eixo da rua, mas sim a frente dos lotes, de modo que as cercas/muros dos lotes é que seriam a borda delas, não o eixo das ruas (ex.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8631023). Lembrando ainda que no JOSM é possível desgrudá-las das ruas facilmente apenas selecionando elas e teclando "G".
.
Bons mapeamentos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66435186
eggie (2019-01-18 19:03:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Probeer svp als het kan bij te taggen op de officiele adresnode.
eggie (2019-01-18 20:14:25+00:00): De info heb ik naar de adresnode verplaatst. Het dubbele adres heb ik verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
DressyPear4 (2019-08-19 20:13:02+00:00): Revertido
DressyPear4 (2019-08-19 20:12:57+00:00): Revertido
DressyPear4 (2019-08-19 20:12:52+00:00): Revertido
4004 (2019-01-20 23:10:13+00:00): лидское все же вряд ли, там стены, пусть и из стекла/дерева. и биргартен это оказывается на открытом воздухе, поставил бар. губерню остабил, потому что не помню как выглядит
Pavelfantik (2019-01-25 18:31:54+00:00): они схожи по конструкции.
Губерня https://ibb.co/5v55Ht2
4004 (2019-01-26 22:43:17+00:00): ну если так, то мне кажется тянет на билдинг. все таки защита от ветра есть, плюс двери
dktue (2019-01-19 11:54:53+00:00): Sieht gut aus!

Schreibt es sich "TTR 2" oder "TTR2"?
EEP-Benny (2019-01-19 11:59:27+00:00): Gute Frage. Den Namen habe ich auch nur aus dritter und vierter Hand gehört und gelesen. Wenn ich nächstes mal dort bin, schaue ich mal, ob am Eingang schon etwas steht.
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-07-09 16:17:31+00:00): Hello, this portion of road is a G-road type (regional), all G-type roads from Moldova are =secondary.
berms (2020-07-09 17:01:34+00:00): Thank you for the information.
maraf24 (2019-05-23 21:14:39+00:00): Podobno granica jest inna: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1789074
Hedaja (2024-08-02 09:24:52+00:00): Hallo Micha
Schon etwas länger her deine Änderung, aber ein paar leuten sind gerade die vielen Klippen aufgefallen. https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/wege-im-gebiet-barensteine-sachsische-schweiz/116216/102
Die sind wohl einige eher maximal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural=earth_bank
Im digitalen Höhenmodell erkennt man richtige Klippen meist daran, dass dort Daten 'fehlen'.
MichaOSM (2024-08-02 09:46:35+00:00): Hallo,
das sind auch eher relative steile Hänge. Es gibt leider aus meiner Sicht in OSM nicht genug differenzierte Merkmale für topografische Landschaftsmerkmale. Aber das ist je eine Diskussion für das Forum.
P.S. Ich kenne die Gegend gut.
Das sind dort in der Regel schon richtige Einschnitte.
Aber gern Ändern, wenn sich eine andere Meinung herausbildet!
MichaOSM (2024-08-02 09:53:26+00:00): P.S: Tag:natural=earth_bank 
kannte ich damals nicht, den hätte ich auch verwendet,
bin mir nicht ganz Sicher ob der Tag erst seit 2017 oder so exisitert ?
MichaOSM (2024-08-02 09:56:11+00:00): p.p.s. würde es, wenn ich mal Zeit habe auch umtaggen, kann aber auch gern jemand anderes vorher machen :-)
Hedaja (2024-08-02 12:07:34+00:00): passt schon. gut möglich, dass es den Tag damals noch nicht gab xD
 Ich habe mich auch manchmal gefragt, wie man solche Übergänge anzeigt. Aber da ist letztlich die Kombination mit Höhendaten (wie sie in den meisten Apps ist) wichtig.
Ich bin jetzt große Teile durchgegangen und habe dort wo wirklich plötzlich steile Abhänge waren.
An sich praktisch, das so drin zu haben und mit dem richtigen tag jetzt sollte es auch nicht mehr für Verwirrung sorgen. Danke für die ursprüngliche Arbeit =)
chachafish (2019-01-28 13:13:20+00:00): Ferchino83, will you please go through all your previous edits and correct the errors you created? You have deleted traffic signals at many, many intersections and replaced them with junction=yes. The junction=yes tags you created are incorrect. Deleting traffic signals is also damaging the map. Please return to your edits and correct them. Thank you.
mapper999 (2019-02-02 11:33:13+00:00): Hi,
wurde das Gebäude abgerissen oder steht es lediglich leer? Auch ein leerstehendes Gebäude wäre weiterhin ein building.
Schröcker (2019-02-03 22:06:00+00:00): Hi,
OK! Ich habe das abgeändert. Früher war das mal als Kantine gemappt.
mavl (2019-01-24 06:32:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66591396 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2478].
mueschel (2019-01-20 11:17:27+00:00): Hi,
you're using a new tag here, "ref:colour:recycling" - could you explain what this means? Is it the colour of the containers?

Thanks
Jan
woodpeck (2019-02-03 11:01:34+00:00): This changeset comment is not useful.
lucadelu (2021-06-18 13:05:48+00:00): Hi, in this change you seth many path and path=no but I have some data saying different, are you sure?
guenz (2021-06-19 07:41:00+00:00): The data is taken from the official bike park map as mentioned under source. 
So I think it is all right, but maybe I made some mistakes.
viloan (2019-01-18 20:26:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
flohoff (2019-01-21 11:53:40+00:00): Moin,
ich glaube für leisure brauchst du kein area?yes - Das ist implizit eine fläche wenn der weg geschlossen ist.

Flo
HolgerJeromin (2019-01-21 16:26:34+00:00): Track ist normalerweise ein lineares feature. Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39271412

https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/3443

Vielleicht wäre pitch auch angebrachter...
Nmxosm (2019-01-19 08:58:22+00:00): Hallo u72ffm,

sieht doch super aus. Ich hätte es nicht anders gemacht (konnte es aber ohne Ortskenntnisse nicht selbst machen ;-)). Den Node kannst du in iD durch anklicken auswählen. 

VlG Nmxosm
EricOlson (2019-01-18 20:35:31+00:00): Sorry, I meant 2100 feet to the south-southeast
joost schouppe (2019-03-11 16:04:00+00:00): Hoi Eebie,
Ik vermoed dat je hier vergeten bent de construction tags te verwijderen na afloop van de werken. De note=* mag ook weg denk ik. En nog opvallend: vehicle=no op een fietspad impliceert dat je er met de fiets niet op mag, toch?
Eebie (2019-03-11 20:00:12+00:00): De oude foute tags zijn verwijderd.
kramxel (2019-01-19 17:07:15+00:00): Hallo, kurzer Hinweis: dieser Poller und der in der Professor-Opladen-Straße existieren nicht. Sie sind geplant, aber noch nicht realisiert.
Wir wollen wir damit verfahren?
Viele Grüße und Danke,
Stephan Barfknecht
HalverHahn (2019-08-06 19:18:13+00:00): Hallo Stephan,
sorry, ich lese das hier erst jetzt. Ich hatte die Poller damals schon eingetrage, damit sie nicht vergessen werden. Da ich nie in die Siedlung fahre, erfahre ich auch nicht, wenn sie da sind. Meinetwegen kannst du sie löschen und später wieder hinzufügen. Mir ist es gleich. Ich fands halt damals nicht so tragisch, weil es keine Hauptverkehrsstrecke ist, die durch die Karte fälschlicherweise beeinträchtigt wird.
Viele Grüße aus Bechen
Chris
mavl (2019-01-19 05:06:36+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
Просто для информации. Название улиц в OpenStreetMap указывают полностью вместе со словом "улица", например "Советская улица". Подробнее об этом можно почитать в статье  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Ефима (2019-02-11 18:25:20+00:00): Спасибо! Буду знать.
eggie (2019-01-18 22:47:24+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
Omelegg is already present.
eggie (2019-01-18 22:50:53+00:00): reverted by changeset  #66442039
Josep Martí Bonet Noguera (2019-01-18 22:08:13+00:00): PD: Se ha establecido el sentido de las dos vías, ambas de un solo sentido.
DaveF (2019-01-19 16:46:50+00:00): Hi
This is not a subways station & station=subway is not part of the public-transport schema.
Jordi MF (2019-01-21 22:27:45+00:00): Hola,

¿En qué modificación necesitas una revisión? ¿Necesitas una revisión sobre el terreno o sobre algún elemento (nodo o vía) que no tengas claro cómo etiquetar? Saludos,
Jordi
easy pete (2019-02-11 19:43:56+00:00): Thanks for putting in the effort on this edit, you helped me learn how to do multipolygons with it
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-11 20:10:05+00:00): No problem! It's a really cool building, so I'm glad we can reflect that on the map somewhat. :)
lmagreault (2019-01-22 09:27:07+00:00): Bonjour,
Concernant la centrale photovoltaïque de Soucia, deux objets avec des tags similaires se superposent :
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664528285
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557044854
Peut-être passer le 664528285 en power=plant et basculer des tags sur 557044854 ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66442573
pyrog (2019-01-22 09:45:18+00:00): En fait les 2 sont redondants.
(Je devais avoir l'option d'iD "Éléments d'occupation des sols" décochée et je n'ai pas vu que la centrale était déjà saisie)

Le mien (664528285) est rendu sur OSM. (J'ai digitalisé les clôtures de la centrale.)

Celui de mapper999 (557044854) doit avoir des tags manquants ou erronés et n'est donc pas rendu.
Il semble avoir digitalisé le contour des panneaux solaires.
Un courageux pourrait digitaliser chaque panneau (et mettre le tag approprié)
;-)
Jordi MF (2019-01-21 22:31:10+00:00): Hola,
Dices que una calle no se puede borrar. ¿Hay alguna calle que no debería aparecer en OpenStreetMap porque no existe en la realidad y, además, no puedes borrarla?
Saludos,
Jordi
highflyer74 (2019-07-02 14:36:47+00:00): Moin! Kannst Du Dir hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1822090#map=19/53.09800/8.89208&layers=N mal die Adressen ansehen? Da scheint etwas durcheinander geraten zu sein... Danke!
SirKingIke (2019-07-03 19:32:06+00:00): Prüfe ich morgen nochmal genauer.
SirKingIke (2019-07-05 12:58:24+00:00): Habe ich angepasst. Der Hinweis war korrekt.
ika-chan! (2019-03-14 22:48:20+00:00): Hi, I think I have done my best to portray the road condition (surface and smoothness) despite the current policy being that villages be linked by at least one tertiary road. If you like, I can change the smoothness to "very_bad" instead of "bad".
ika-chan! (2019-09-05 14:11:13+00:00): Although many rural roads in Greece are suitable for 4x4s, the current consensus is to connect all villages and hamlets with a tertiary road, using surface=* and smoothness=* to describe the condition.

Also, why are you not answering my concerns at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66443000 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66443316, and also leave no meangful changeset comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Δημήτρης Μπαλτουμάς/history
Alecs01 (2019-01-27 12:10:18+00:00): You deleted a place=city node here, already restored: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31432063/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-28 17:09:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 66708504, 66712182 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppet vandalism of a primarily Italian data troll.  For more info see the links from https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2483
ika-chan! (2019-01-20 13:56:30+00:00): Why you downgrade roads between villages and hamlets to a dirt road? The current consensus is to connect all villages and hamlets with a tertiary road, and using surface=* and smoothness=* to describe the condition.
BCNorwich (2019-01-26 15:04:25+00:00): Joined up crossing roads for you.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-28 17:10:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 66708504, 66712182 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppet vandalism of a primarily Italian data troll.  For more info see the links from https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2483
viloan (2019-01-19 01:13:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-28 17:10:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 66708504, 66712182 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppet vandalism of a primarily Italian data troll.  For more info see the links from https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2483
viloan (2019-01-19 01:35:40+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kucai (2021-09-30 03:34:11+00:00): Where do you get the name Tarun Broga? There is Kampung Tarun with unknown boundaries, but there sure isn't Tarun Broga anywhere.
Duane Eddie Louis (2023-12-18 15:45:33+00:00): Wow
Hb- (2019-09-21 21:43:38+00:00): Deir ez-Zor is a war zone. The Bing aerials are several years old.  The Wikipedia article about the bridge you edited tells that this bridge over the Euphrat is destroyed.  The motorway bridge is destroyed too.  Only the Russian mobile bridge is passable. See changeset 74759959
masojuli (2019-02-19 21:36:10+00:00): hi! Will you please confirm that you were correct to delete part of the Beltline Expressway motorway and motorway links just north of this segment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501860789#map=18/44.94188/-93.34827 ? I do not have local knowledge of this area, but the Minnesota DOT page repoirts normal driving conditions here (see: https://hb.511mn.org/#roadReports?timeFrame=TODAY&layers=allReports%2CroadReports%2CwinterDriving%2CweatherWarnings%2CotherStates ). Thank you for your help!
DannyMcD (2019-01-22 19:13:34+00:00): This seems like a clear-cut abuse of multiple accounts - you created duplicate place nodes with OntarioEditor, then deleted the originals with osm_validation_and_improvements. 
 This makes it difficult to undo the changes (or even see the history of what happened), and destroys the place node history/metadata.  I would guess both accounts are sockpuppets of VMeyer.  If you want to re-classify all places within incorporated cities/towns/villages as suburbs, I suggest you contact the talk-ca mailing list first to see what others think.  There is a case for it, but it should be done honestly and openly, not like in this changeset.
DannyMcD
DannyMcD (2019-01-22 21:47:15+00:00): For instance, for Tottenham: in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66083824 on Jan 7, @VMeyer re-classified Tottenham as a suburb.  I restored it to a village on Jan 10.  In response, on Jan 19, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66444429, @OntarioEditor created a new node in exactly the same location as the old Tottenham node.  Then in this changeset (which overlaps in time with @OntarioEditor's), @osm_validation_and_improvements deleted the old Tottenham node.  @moe_fockler, @North_American_Highways, and possibly @ZackRogge-Riveros also seem to be duplicate accounts of @VMeyer.
Geography Canada (2019-01-25 00:19:22+00:00): Also, see user [71XRZ](https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/71XRZ/), who posted the same comment as VMeyer: [changeset 65361464](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65361464), [changeset 65979451](https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65979451). See also user [5XWarrior](https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/5XWarrior), who restored multiple of VMeyer's nodes.
Geography Canada (2019-01-25 00:36:23+00:00): And just 14 seconds after I made the above comment, user 71XRZ created a changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66616776. Coincidence much?
Jarek 🚲 (2019-01-25 22:12:12+00:00): I haven't looked into the edits, but IMO naming an account "osm_validation_and_improvements" without identifying an experienced OSM user on whose behalf those edits are made is borderline bannable offence in itself - the name implies authority which is not backed up.
DannyMcD (2019-01-25 23:45:22+00:00): I have reported osm_validation_and_improvements with the "Report User" function - I'm still waiting to hear back.  I mentioned the questionable name issue in the report.
Geography Canada (2019-01-28 00:09:20+00:00): The user changed their name to "IllinoisEditor". Sounds a lot like "OntarioEditor", doesn't it?
Geography Canada (2019-01-28 00:21:08+00:00): Additionally:

At 10:36:35 UTC, OntarioEditor changes a place from a quarter to a suburb: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/33364832/history.

Around 7 minutes later, moe_fockler does the same thing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6233223378/history.
skquinn (2022-08-26 20:41:35+00:00): Do you remember what way 664547281 was supposed to be (currently untagged and not a relation member)?
Hjart (2019-01-22 11:46:33+00:00): Hvorfor tilføjede du highway=service til færgeruten https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23609972/history ?
DavidKewley (2019-01-19 06:53:35+00:00): Reverted because this changed a highway into a business.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-01-19 06:22:54+00:00): Hi, I noticed you changed parks from leisure=park to landuse=park. This is incorrect - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-08-27 11:10:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110335556 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some historic MAPS.ME personal markers in Thailand.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-01-20 00:58:59+00:00): Hi, is this a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4859508750 ?
nevw (2019-01-19 08:48:25+00:00): Hi
I reverted this as you need to map your business over the building you operate from using  the proper addr tags instead of placing in Royal Park, Melbourne.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-08-27 11:10:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110335556 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some historic MAPS.ME personal markers in Thailand.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-08-27 11:10:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110335556 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some historic MAPS.ME personal markers in Thailand.
Supaplex (2019-02-06 13:56:58+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-08-27 11:10:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110335556 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some historic MAPS.ME personal markers in Thailand.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-08-27 11:10:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110335556 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some historic MAPS.ME personal markers in Thailand.
geri-oc (2019-01-31 19:32:00+00:00): Was sollen B 97 und B 168 an der L 48?

Bitte unterlasse solche Änderungen.

Gruß Gerd
geri-oc (2019-01-31 19:32:57+00:00): Bitte sende oder verlinke Beweise das deine Änderungen richtig sind: L48 -> B 97;B 168:

Bitte unterlasse vorerst solche Änderungen oder verlinke die Beweise (Quellen) die für OSM zugelassen sind - Vor Ort Prinzip - also Fotos oder Mapillary - keine Zeitungsartikel oder hören-sagen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-08-27 11:10:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110335556 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some historic MAPS.ME personal markers in Thailand.