piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-03-09 12:00:08+00:00): .. even gekeken..

Het is rijstebrij in het begin al die tags.. 

tracktype=grade3 hoort ook bij de regel highway=track..., maar het is een highway=path  Dus de hele  regel tracktype mag weg.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100707193

In het kort
Een track heeft een tracktype
Is het een 'path' geen tracktype.. 

mapse
eggie
geoaria (2021-03-11 11:14:15+00:00): شما تگ بسیاری از مسیر ها را برداشته اید و باعث خطا در نقشه شده اید . خواهشمند است دست از تخریب نقشه بردارید
geoaria (2021-03-11 11:20:12+00:00): شما تگ بسیاری از مسیر ها را آگاهانه یا غیرآگاهانه تغییر داده اید و متاسفانه باعث خطاهای بسیاری در نقشه شده اید. دست بردارید
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-09 11:46:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia/Admin_Boundaries_of_Regions_and_Governorates_Import
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-22 02:10:32+00:00): Reverted in changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135213986
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-09 11:46:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Saudi_Arabia/Admin_Boundaries_of_Regions_and_Governorates_Import
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-22 02:10:30+00:00): Reverted in changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135213986
ChristianA (2021-09-21 13:30:35+00:00): Hej. Är du säker på positionen för den nedlagda järnvägen utmed E22? Kikar man på Lantmäteriets ortofoto från 1960-talet ligger den en bit därifrån. 
Mvh
eggie (2021-03-09 12:31:31+00:00): Hoi.. Zodra je de paden gaat vastmaken aan de landuse wordt het heel lastig om de kaart later te bewerken. In OSM  Nederland ontmoedigen we het vastplakken van landuse aan wegen.
De Haag is een 'mooi' voorbeeld waar haast niet meer te mappen is.
Een Duitse mapper. 
In Duitsland zijn er wel mappers die dit doen.
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken... of over te schakelen op de betere editor JOSM.. 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 Hier is de linker ctrl.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-09 12:41:26+00:00): Paden heb ik even losgemaakt van de landuse=forest
mrNoolas (2021-03-09 12:49:01+00:00): Ah, ja begrijpelijk. Zal ik de volgende keer anders doen dan.
Mashin (2021-04-03 02:22:40+00:00): Hi MapleExplorer,
thanks for your edits, but did you get a permission from the author of the map to use it for adding features to OSM?

Also, what happened to the paths? many have unrealistically sharp angles or are not connected to anything else.
Famlam (2021-04-17 20:26:29+00:00): Misschien nog een paar kleine extra feedbackpuntjes:

1. rechtsboven is een voetpad; sluit dit aan op de weg van de parkeerplaats? Zo ja, dan zou ik deze ook doortekenen tot de serviceweg
2. linksonder: sluit de parkeerplaats niet aan op de weg? Momenteel sluit deze alleen op het fietspad aan (maar ik neem aan dat er auto's mogen komen)
3. linksonder: het toegangsweggetje naar de parkeerplaats staat als service=parking_isle aangegeven. Ik schat dat je echter pas mag parkeren in de "U-vorm". In dat geval zou het eerste stukje geen "service=parking_isle" moeten hebben. service=parking_isle is echt voor op het parkeerterrein zelf, niet het toegangsweggetje ernaartoe.

Hopelijk heb je hier iets aan :)
Famlam (2021-04-19 16:13:32+00:00): Ik heb deze al aangepast gezien ik zelf ook wat wijzigingen in de omgeving wilde aanbrengen ;)
msevilla00 (2022-04-08 14:36:14+00:00): Dear topolusitania, I do not understand the use of the tag landuse=meadow within this photovoltaic plant. It seems like you are editing for the render because I guess there is no meadow (grass + irrigation system alike) at all in there. I could understand grass o bush but nothing like a meadow. Could you explain me the use of this tag or change to an other convenient one?
Cheers
topolusitania (2022-04-08 17:40:05+00:00): Hola.
Gracias por llamar la atencion, sin cambiar el dibujo. 
En la definicion de "meadow" no esta escrito que tiene que tener irrigacion.
En  esta planta en particular no se si hay ovejas que vienen a comer la hierba que crece entre los paneles. Es una pratica corriente en Portugal, e por eso todas o casi todas las plantas fotovoltaicas estan mapeadas como meadow.
Pienso que la traduccion de grass es mas bien "cesped" e no me parece  correcto. Otra sugerência es "bush  o shrub e esta tag remite para un arbusto - planta leñosa de tamaño pequeño o mediano. Suele tener una altura inferior a los 6 m.
A  shrub or bush is a small to medium-sized woody plant. Usually it is below 6 metres in height. For scrublands, which feature land covered with shrubs
En Portugal hemos eligido lo que creemos reflecte lo que pasa en el terreno quando no hay sequia..
Estoy (estamos) abiertos a sugerencias sobre el tema.
Una question mas: Sabes algo sobre los avances de normalizar la "dehesa" ? Hace tiempo se hablo del tema entre portugueses e españoles
Un cordial saludo
TL
msevilla00 (2022-04-11 07:55:30+00:00): Hola, Gracias por la respuesta. Lo que sucede con esa etiqueta es que corresponde, bajo mi interpretación, a una vegetación ligada a un área de pastos pero en un ecosistema húmero, una realidad muy alejada de la que existe en ese área realmente seca. Me consta que en esta planta como en otros portuguesas se está promoviendo que las ovejas entren a pastar entre las placas fotovoltaicas pero entre ellas te puedo asegurar que no hay una superficie "verde" y contínua de herbáceas. Quizá deberíamos usar natural=grassland, aunque es más una vegetación de tomillar, o sea ni es contínua de herbáceas, se presentan pequeños matorrales y no existe una etiqueta que refleje esa realidad. Sucede como con las dehesas. Podemos pensar en ello.
Saludos
dval (2021-05-23 04:13:54+00:00): Нет здесь моста.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
geoaria (2021-03-11 10:25:16+00:00): خواهشمند است از تغییر درجه راه ها به صورت غیر اصولی خودداری کنید ، قبل از هر گونه ادیت نقشه در ویکی شرایط هر تگ را قبل از اعمال روی نقشه مطالعه نمایید . بید آبادی حائز شرایط secondary نمی باشد.
تولیدی گلریزان (2021-04-07 04:49:38+00:00): سلام بزرگوار. بنده توضیحات درجه راه ها را به دقت خواندم. و با توجه به شناختی که از منطقه دارم فکر میکنم باید درجه 2 باشد.
همچنین با توجه به اینکه برخی معابر اطراف که هم سطح بیدآبادی هستند واقعا کوچک تر و در حد کوچه هستند.
در صورتی که بیدآبادی واقعا یک خیابان پرتردد است.
تولیدی گلریزان (2021-04-07 04:50:41+00:00): خوشحال میشم شما علت صحبت تون را دقیق تر بفرمایید تا در جریان باشم.
ممنون
geoaria (2021-04-07 07:26:19+00:00): صرفا تردد بالای یک مسیر برای تعیین درجه راه کافی نیست. جاده های مسکونی و کوچه و جاده های فرعی و خاکی اولین درجه مسیر ها هستند بعد هز آن جاده های درجه سه که چندین جاده مسکونی یک منطقه را به هم متصل می کنند. و سپس جاده درجه دو که چندین جاده درجه سه را به هم متصل می کند. اگر در یک منطقه یک شریان اصلی درجه سه تمام انشعبات را جمع می کند نیازی به جاده درجه دو نمی باشد. صرفا از روی رنگ و احساس درجه مسیر را تعیین و تعییر ندهید.
SafetyIng (2021-03-09 17:53:42+00:00): Hallo, du hast leider etwas hier kaputt gemacht. 
Schaffst du das von alleine, es zu revetieren?
SafetyIng (2021-03-09 17:55:15+00:00): Die Angabe der Öffnungszeiten ist auch leider falsch. 
Wenn man dir bei dem Einstieg in OSM etwas leichter zu machen - kannst du dich gerne an mich wenden und ich helfe gerne weiter :)
kartonage (2021-03-10 07:41:09+00:00): Habe mal die sichtbaren (https://osmcha.org/changesets/100711615/) Verschiebungen zurückgesetzt.

Schöne Grüße
SafetyIng (2021-03-09 17:59:33+00:00): Was ist eigentlich der Sinn hinter den "neuen" cunstruction-Wegen? Es existieren doch die alten Wege.
Wäre es nicht angebracht die existiereden Wege erst umzutragen, wenn dort die Baustelle weitergeführt wird?
tvbrene (2021-03-09 18:59:56+00:00): Das Ziel ist zu sehen, was das Ergebnis der Baumaßnahme ist. Der alte Weg der zur Benutzung noch frei ist (Ostseite Adelheidring) ist auch nach wie vor vorhanden. An sich könnte man sogar noch mehr Wege zur Baustelle umwidmen, da z.B. zur Zeit der Gehweg südlich der Olvenstedter Straße zur Zeit neu gebaut wird, aber die Karte muss auch nicht exakt jeden Bauabschnitt widerspiegeln. Natürlich könnte man die existierenden Wege dann auch noch auf die neue Position verschieben.
SafetyIng (2021-03-09 19:37:00+00:00): Aber die Daten (nicht die Karte) sollen die reale Situation widerspiegeln. 
Und je nach Dauer (so grob 6 Wochen) kann man dass schon einzeichnen.
Am Ende wird dann aber wahrscheinlich von irgendwem der "construction"-Weg umgewidmet der andere gelöscht und so geht die Historie verloren. Was auf jeden Fall zu vermeiden ist. 

Und aktuell ist da z.B der Fußweg Adelheitring-Ost halt nicht im Bau - er ist vielleicht geplant. Aber sicher nicht nicht "construction".
tvbrene (2021-03-09 23:48:05+00:00): Ich habe den Weg auf "proposed" gesetzt, dann sollte es damit keine Probleme geben.
geoaria (2021-03-11 11:06:31+00:00): شما اتصال خیابان فروغی و تگریان را قطع کرده اید. خواهشمند است دست از تخریب نقشه بردارید
user_2066394 (2021-04-08 20:22:20+00:00): In welchen Schritten werden die Hausnummern bei
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289391181
hochgezählt?
alf16 (2021-04-09 06:39:51+00:00): Es geht von unten nach oben 11 Hausnummern, die letzten beiden sind 51a und 51b. Wenn ich hier was hochladen kann, kann ich einen übersichtsplan der Siedlung schicken.
user_2066394 (2021-04-09 20:06:03+00:00): Am besten direkt einzelne Adressknoten eintragen und ausrichten, am besten auch gleich für die anderen Wohnblöcke.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:43:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
pesec (2021-03-10 11:52:38+00:00): При нанесении парковочного кармана вдоль проезда граница парковки должна соприкасаться с прилегающим проездом.
a_goat (2026-04-05 21:51:34+00:00): Μετά τις καταχωρήσεις residential areas, ήτοι https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502942009/, πιστεύω πως τα τοπονύμια εδώ, έστω Κορδελιού και Ελευθερίων είναι παρωχημένα. Επίσης αυτό για τα Ελευθέρια φαίνεται σε λάθος σημείο;
geoaria (2021-03-11 10:32:20+00:00): شما تگ بازارچه علی قلی آقا را پاک کرده اید خواهشمند است قبل از هر گونه ویرایش نقشه با قوانین ویکی و روش ادیت نقشه آشنا شوید. ادیت های شما اگر به همین منوال ادامه یابد تخریب های شدیدی روی نقشه اصفهان ایجاد خواهد کرد.
CAI Stabia (2021-03-09 14:54:39+00:00): Ti chiedo il motivo della cancellazione  della way e dell'albero indicato. In assenza di tue giustificazioni ti segnalerò agli admin
ALu68 (2021-03-10 18:59:08+00:00): Hello RoboD

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/915049066
KLAMKA LEWA PRZEDNIA CITROEN C4 ???

Regards
RoboD (2021-03-10 19:34:18+00:00): Mea culpa, zostało ze schowka
RoboD (2021-03-10 19:35:20+00:00): Left from the clipboard
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-10 21:54:03+00:00): Wyczyszczone.
ALu68 (2021-03-11 07:09:13+00:00): Clear.
Cristoffs (2021-03-12 01:08:17+00:00): Ubawiłem się. Najbardziej oryginalna nazwa w OSM ;-)
syntex (2021-03-09 18:20:34+00:00): R?
Dawid2849 (2021-03-09 18:37:25+00:00): R
voltairovicz (2021-03-09 19:18:53+00:00): R!
syntex (2021-03-09 20:15:25+00:00): R???
Cristoffs (2021-03-09 22:53:53+00:00): To jakiś szyfr?
voltairovicz (2021-03-09 23:55:55+00:00): nie wiem, o co chodzi, ale mnie tu koledzy nawiedzili XD
syntex (2021-03-10 01:26:58+00:00): Bo się zastanawiam o co Ci chodziło z tym R w opisie xD
DaveF (2021-04-16 10:45:56+00:00): Hi
Why have you deleted valid driveways?
Carldobs (2021-04-16 10:56:35+00:00): The owners of the property had issues with a large number of commercial vans using the track as satnavs were seeing as a through road for service
DaveF (2021-04-16 11:15:52+00:00): That's not a valid reason for removal. 
Add access=private.
ndm (2021-03-09 21:20:14+00:00): No street name. Conditional is broken. Did you really survey this? Did you add a note for local mappers to check it?
MapMapperMap (2021-03-10 11:10:32+00:00): I have done this editing  according information from mapillary and driver's feedback

I used this example for OSM WIKI
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=pbbZIF4PYRR0UWt6Ahv7mg&focus=photo

I have just added motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (Fr-Sa 20:00-00:00, Sa-Su 00:00)

maybe you can help me to improve this restriction
MapMapperMap (2021-03-10 11:13:43+00:00): Sorry, i saw my mistake and thank you for editing
CAI Stabia (2021-03-09 15:07:33+00:00): Il tag path che hai modificato in service è errato, in quanto service identifica gli autogrill:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dservices
Note_Fixer (2021-03-09 13:59:47+00:00): Note 2571775
BeKri (2021-03-10 08:21:27+00:00): Hupps sorry,
warum ist das wichtig ?
Dachte das ist da "unnötig"
Die Route des 143 hat sich geändert
weil Höffner vor dem Zelt die Durchfahrt weggenommen hat.
Gruss derBeKri
ToniE (2021-03-10 08:31:19+00:00): Servus,

barrier=* bringen gewisse individuelle Zugangsbeschränkungen mit sich:

- barrier=bollard: foot=yes, bicycle=yes, motor_vehicle=no, ...

- barrier=lift_gate: foot=yes (?), alle anderen = no/private

Für ÖPNV müssen die Beschränkungen also explizit aufgelöst werden.

Ich glaube, nicht alle Navis/Routing-Engines beachten das (barrier=*), daher sind Beschränkungen zunächst (und häufig nur) auf den dahinter liegenden Ways angegeben.
Gruß
Toni

BTW: JOSM meckert, dass psv=yes auf barrier (Node) falsch sei. Aber auch JOSM kann mal irren.
ToniE (2021-03-10 08:36:37+00:00): > Die Route des 143 hat sich geändert
weil Höffner vor dem Zelt die Durchfahrt weggenommen hat.

Hmm, geht die Route nicht mehr über den Parkplatz?
BeKri (2021-03-10 09:08:25+00:00): Ehrlich ?
Die Haltestelle ist am Eingang
Zwischen Eingang und Ausgang haben sie den Platz vor dem Zelt jetzt befestigt, man kann also nicht mehr durchfahren.
Ich hab den Bus jetzt(nach Logik)
VOR dem Zelt zurück auf den Weg geführt.
Zugegeben: gefahren oder geschaut wo er genau langfährt habe ich (noch) nicht,
Grus derBeKri
ToniE (2021-03-10 11:28:03+00:00): NA ja, wenn's über die 1 nicht mehr geht, dann  bleibt wohl nr die 5 - basst scho.
Habe noch ein paar "Refinements" (Zitat) angebracht und was man sonst noch auf Luftbildern sieht.

access=destination -> access=customers + operator Möbel Höffner 

...
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
kapazao (2021-03-09 15:10:34+00:00): Hola, las calles que estaban puestas como highway=tertiary son calles que tienen más prioridad que otras para la circulación de vehículos. Si eliminas esto se pierde ruteamiento y conectividad entre vías más prioritarias.
Por favor te pediría que lo dejases como estaba.
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100716266
JuananRojas (2021-03-09 17:09:50+00:00): En ese caso volveré a ponerlas como estaban, aunque las direcciones las mantendré, ya que no se correspondían con la realidad.
kapazao (2021-03-09 18:25:20+00:00): Por supuesto si eres local y conoces algo que esté mal corrige todo lo necesario, gracias!
jumbanho (2021-03-09 16:36:03+00:00): Hi, welcome to Openstreetmap and thank you for editing the map.  I noticed that you deleted a parking lot here (and you noted that in the changset, which is great).  Based on your changeset, I believe that you thought that because the parking lot was private, it should not be on the map.  However, in OSM anything that is visible can be mapped as long as it is accurately tagged.  I looked at the parking lot that you removed and it was marked as being private.  

Also, you removed two sidewalks, which appear to actually be there.

Thanks again for making the map better!
jmoran314 (2021-03-09 16:51:11+00:00): Hi, I'm with the Homeplace III HOA.  At this time we don't need to mark every sidewalk and parking spot in Homeplace III (right now our priority is to improve street navigation).  Having just this set marked implied they were somehow different from the rest, so in this case I'd rather be consistent than complete.
jumbanho (2021-03-09 17:20:45+00:00): While I appreciate you wanting to have a map that looks good for your purpose, OSM is a community of volunteer mappers that accumulates data which will always be incomplete.  In general, it is not considered constructive to delete the work of other contributors unless that work is incorrect.
jmoran314 (2021-03-11 18:56:59+00:00): I see my edit was reverted by changeset 100779723.  This was not a cosmetic edit.  Homeplace III reserves the right to decide how our parking is presented to the public.  Having the parking singled out for units 104-106 can be interpreted as that parking being used differently than other unit parking, which is not the case.  Furthermore, the parking is not a single open lot as the marking suggests.  It is a series of individually assigned spots bordering (not overlapping) the residential road Normandale Ct.  We need that residential road clearly marked for deliveries and other navigation -- the parking interferes with that.  That is why we chose to remove it with our edits.  Because another contributor in Germany (with no relation to Homeplace III) decided to mark some of our spots and moved on, that does not obligate us to accept the status quo or to put in the labor to mark all our other unit parking to be consistent (marking which we don't want in the first place).  Some joker could tag one our units with a data point "Toilets (private)", we would not accept that either.  I'd appreciate a direct contact to resolve this dispute.
woodpeck (2021-03-11 20:55:24+00:00): Frederik from Data Working Group here. We have recorded this incident as Ticket#2021031110000139. I have explained to jmoran314 that there is no legal basis on which to request deletion. I do concur however that this particular parking lot sticks out - firstly because of the sidewalks that are relative unusual around the edges of parking lots, and secondly because out of dozens of parking lots in the immediate surroundings, this is the only one that has been mapped. Could I suggest that we simply map the others as well, which would then make this one appear as one of many instead of the odd one out?
marc__marc (2021-03-15 13:34:45+00:00): Bonjour,
dans l'ensemble c'est très bien.
il y a juste un soucis de doublon : si on compte les stations d'essence, il y a en 2 à cet endroit
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/915065299
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3557801654
le mieux est de transformer la surface en zone "retail"
Cordialement,
Marc
pez17 (2021-03-15 15:36:44+00:00): Merci pour votre retour. En effet, je ne savais pas comment supprimer ce doublon de tag et de logo.
J'ai donc modifié le "landuse" du secteur.
Merci !
iandees (2021-03-09 14:37:18+00:00): What's up with the deletions?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100716815
kylebakerpa05 (2021-03-09 17:09:57+00:00): Tbh I’m not going to go and fix all these building manually since it’s such a pain, whoever drew these buildings used a super old map or layout since most of them are gone, I’m trying to fix them so they match the map box map and I don’t feel like manually fixing all of the buildings all at once, it’s lots of hard work.
iandees (2021-03-09 17:22:27+00:00): Ok, I guess I'll come in behind you and clean it up then. Thanks for adding address data.
iandees (2021-03-09 18:09:34+00:00): I see you did the cleanup. I apologize for blasting away your address changes so quickly. I thought you had finished. I can keep fixing my mistake if you want to keep mapping.

Two bits of feedback:
a) when you're drawing buildings you should be drawing where the building touches the ground, not the visible roof line. For example, in this screenshot you traced the roofline with an extra node to match the roof elevation, but OSM is looking for the trace of where the building touches the ground (the green line I added): https://i.imgur.com/Xs0hps1.png

b) When you're done adding details to a rectangular building, hit the "Q" key to square the corners so they have right angles like they do on the ground.
kylebakerpa05 (2021-03-09 18:57:44+00:00): Sure that’s fine and alright thank you.
Dimacn (2021-03-09 17:12:31+00:00): И давно на участке дороги разрешили 110 км/ч ? - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/701909277

Давно дорога сквозь Дубровку перестала быть в черте населённого пункта? -
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/740808090
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333284976
dimKam (2021-03-09 17:18:16+00:00): камер на участке 110 нет,водители ездят ещебыстрее. Сквозь Дубровку проходит федеральная трасса, где едут 80
Dimacn (2021-03-09 17:25:17+00:00): Пожалуйста перечитайте ПДД. В населённом пункте разрешённая скорость - 60 км/ч, вне населённых 90, если иное не установлено знаками. Я откачу ваше правку. В Дубровке кстати, камера прекрасно ловит.
dimKam (2021-03-09 17:33:18+00:00): Время приезда автомобиля такси значительно отличается от реального (более быстрого)
Dimacn (2021-03-10 03:42:39+00:00): Вы едете 110, другой едет 150 - но это же не повод повышать максимально разрешённую скорость на этом участке. Именно такая скорость прописывается в maxspeed. Вашу скорость можете указать в теге maxspeed:practical=*
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-03-09 21:41:04+00:00): Hello,
that's a lot of different changes (Military area adjusted; addresses added). May I ask you for your sources?
Greetings, Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-03-10 06:46:22+00:00): Hi,
I have now realised that you did not add any new addresses, but only copied from the address nodes. The adjustments to the military area are also OK. Sorry! It's just irritating when the CS comment doesn't match the actual changes.
Regards, Roger Wilco
Kalaallit Nunaat (2021-03-23 19:14:46+00:00): Bonjour, pourriez-vous préciser vos sources, car d'après les images aériennes et le cadastre ça ne ressemble franchement pas à une forêt !
compdude (2021-03-27 23:17:48+00:00): In the US, any road that is a two-lane undivided freeway like this one (aka a "super two") should be tagged as trunk, not motorway. Please change it back, thanks!
FlowerHillPerson (2022-03-10 15:57:21+00:00): Done!
rab (2021-06-24 19:30:23+00:00): Hallo uliwanne,
kannst du das tagging noch berichtigen?
 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
denomination wäre je 1 mal:
roman_catholic,jehovahs_witness,mormon und wahrscheinlich pentecostal

Das "hospital" würde ich eher als "clinic" einstufen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dclinic
Fadlilaa IRM-RV (2021-06-28 00:09:51+00:00): Hello, based on https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/915083961 there is water crossing the highway. But when I look at Citra Mazar I don't see anything, is there a bridge that separates land and water? thank you
Linhares (2021-06-28 12:23:53+00:00): Hello, I am using Esri imagery (they are the most updated photos here)
Regards, Linhares

from JOSM preferences:
tms[22]:https://{switch:services,server}.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/rest/services/World_Imagery/MapServer/tile/{zoom}/{y}/{x}
sefabaris (2021-03-22 17:15:20+00:00): Pist şu an mevcut değil. Pisti de içine alan bölgede "Davutpaşa Millet Bahçesi" bulunmakta.
Marych_ (2021-03-12 04:25:06+00:00): Добрый день
просьба
если меняете name
name	Umid ko‘chasi
имя на русском что было в 
name:ru добавляйте пожалуйста

по Узбекистану лучше использовать Mixar подложку вместо Esri World Imagery
felipeeugenio (2021-03-09 18:03:17+00:00): usuario incorpora nombres falsos