piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fritzifuchs (2022-06-29 05:19:51+00:00): Mir ist der Knoten "Metzgerei Fuchs" vorher irgendwie nie aufgefallen.
Leerstand ist da nicht, denn es handelt sich um die übliche Fleisch-/Käse/-Fischtheke, wie in so vielen Supermärkten. Daher war es in meinen Augen falsch, dass die Kühltheke als Metzger getaggt war.
Der Bäcker ist korrekt, weil es der eigenständige örtliche Bäcker ist, im Vorraum des Supermarktes.
user_2066394 (2022-06-29 14:08:55+00:00): Da müsste man eben schauen, wer die Filiale ggf. betreibt/betrieben hat, ob tatsächlich Rewe in Eigenregie oder fremdvergeben an z. B. Metzgerei Fuchs, die laut Webseite wohl auch einige Filialen in Rewe-Märkten hat.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 12:59:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128210005 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:35:12+00:00): Hi,

the relation 12653791 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM will help you to prevent a new one, maybe you could update your software ?

Best regards
Martin Borsje (2022-06-28 16:39:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Bąbel (2022-09-13 09:49:29+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.1075660&lon=17.0407445&zoom=19&camera.phi=-22.413
Tak widzi OSM w 3D.
przejście oławskie. to twoja robota?
Mordechai23 (2022-09-13 14:02:48+00:00): Nazwa przejścia oławskiego się wzięła stąd, że jest to średniowieczna brama oławska, nad którą zbudowano w latach 70ch drogę. W tagach wszystko się zgadza, a niedoskonałość jednego konkretnego renderera to nie mój problem
Bąbel (2022-09-13 16:49:35+00:00): Dorzuć 'poziomy' w tagowaniu, może się poprawi. Bardziej chodzi mi o interpretacje ortofoto, przebieg ciągów komunikacyjnych. Nasi maperzy rysują podjazdy parkingu na dachu - co temu da rade. Chociaż w 2D niech będzie porządek.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-09 23:15:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127271939 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Patrickov (2022-06-28 09:40:45+00:00): What?  You undid all my paths?
Patrickov (2022-06-28 09:43:48+00:00): Okay, rendering issue, I retract my question.
Patrickov (2022-06-28 09:46:42+00:00): One more thing, though, two of the stops are not on a sawtooth.

Specifically:
1. The one immediately to the east of entrance E1, and
2. The 2nd on eastbound line west of entrance E1
Kovoschiz (2022-06-28 10:08:22+00:00): Ok I will take a look. We can certain discuss what should be `indoor=` and `tunnel=building_passage`, but I wanted to be consistent with `highway=service`. (since you didn't change that), and there is no `level=` yet.
Patrickov (2022-06-29 07:20:15+00:00): jOSM gave warning for various stuff tagging level=0 so I omitted them for the new objects I added in.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:11:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:17:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:26:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-29 07:19:58+00:00): Hello. I've restored some very strange landuse adjustments in Šiauliai which were incorrect as such as well as introducing a lot of topological errors.
UrSuS (2022-06-29 07:32:26+00:00): I have tried to distance landuse polygons from highway=* ways, but didn't have time to make perfect corrections, so you can revert back changes ✌️
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-29 07:34:28+00:00): Oh, I see :-)
DD1GJ (2022-06-28 22:04:50+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe Deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht, weil dadurch die Abkürzung auch für den allgemeinen motorisierten Verkehr freigegeben wurde. Radfahrer und Fußgänger dürfen durchaus normale Feldwege benutzen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Jouat (2022-06-29 15:25:49+00:00): Hallo, und Danke für die grundsätzlichen Hinweise.
Mein Anlass für meine Änderung war, dass meine App 'OsmAndMaps', die auf den OpenStreetMap-Karten basiert, bei einer Route per Fahrrad (!) diesen Teil des Wegs vermieden hat, obwohl er klar die kürzere Wahl war und auf jeden Fall für Fahrräder funktioniert. Gibt es für solche Fälle sinnvollere Anpassungen?
DD1GJ (2022-06-29 15:51:19+00:00): Nein, die OSM-Daten sind an dieser Stelle perfekt. Ich habe es gerade mit OsmAnd im Fahrrad-Modus ausprobiert und bei mir hat es funktioniert. Was sind Start und Ziel?

Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=54.6864%2C8.4859%3B54.6908%2C8.4791
Jouat (2022-06-29 16:23:16+00:00): Ich habe in der App Deine vorgeschlagene Route angefragt und sie hat mir exakt Deinen Weg vorgeschlagen.
Aber vom Haus Heidweg 14 aus (dort habe ich ein paar Tage gewohnt) navigiert die App den längeren Weg Richtung Nordosten über den Heidweg (nicht aber in Deiner Route, deren Start ich modifiziert habe...).
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:34:10+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14275293 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software).

Best regards
NeemaAlphonce (2022-07-06 06:20:02+00:00): Hi, sorry for the late reply. I created the problem without knowing, but tried to find the problem unfortunately  I didn't find it ( useless relation), hope was solved.
user_8101879 (2022-07-15 15:22:26+00:00): Hi,

no problem, I will delete it.
Best regards
NeemaAlphonce (2022-07-16 13:32:46+00:00): oh thank you.
literan (2022-06-28 17:35:43+00:00): вот только тег name здесь лишний, он для имен собственных.
почищу
lunarbirdmyt (2022-06-29 04:56:39+00:00): Понял, спасибо!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 09:23:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9852938309/history has so = b that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
brianboru (2025-12-18 10:26:15+00:00): finger trouble - just delete
PVitt (2022-08-10 16:14:03+00:00): Hallo Jan,

Mit diesem Changeset bin ich nicht ganz glücklich. Du schreibst als Position "neben dem Krankenzimmer", positionierst den Node aber mitten auf dem Schulhof.
Auch der Kommentar in den opening_hours ist verbesserungswürdig. Wenn keine Aussage entsprechend der Definition des Wertebereichs möglich ist, dann den Key besser weglassen.

mfG, Peter
JanW_ (2022-08-11 05:46:16+00:00): Hallo Peter,
danke für den Hinweis. Habe die Position des Defis nun präzisiert.
mfg JanW_
jqngarcia (2022-06-28 13:02:03+00:00): Hola, no d'han de duplicar elements, el Parc del turonet está mapejat com a poligon, no cal possar un punt.
Pots eliminar?

Salut i Mapes, JQN
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:32:56+00:00): Hi,

the relation 12653702 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM will help you to prevent a new one, maybe you could update your software ?

Best regards
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 12:32:44+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9852977856/history has so = 774516 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
brianboru (2024-05-03 15:30:43+00:00): finger trouble: just delete thanks
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-04 18:16:46+00:00): done!
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:31:57+00:00): Hi,

the relation 12653882 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM will help you to prevent a new one, maybe you could update your software ?

Best regards
DD1GJ (2022-06-28 22:34:15+00:00): Teilrevert , einzelne Stolpersteine wieder hergestellt, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122976800

Ändere bitte nicht großflächig von iD gemeldete "Probleme".
4004 (2022-06-29 09:31:19+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
вроде ж пока еще не заполняем name на беларускай, ждем миграции и делаем это централизованно?
domgo (2022-06-29 09:37:49+00:00): Ок. Про миграцию не понял?
4004 (2022-06-30 15:45:42+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75256
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:07:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
aixbrick (2022-06-28 12:56:31+00:00): Hallo,
auf welchem Wege wurdest du denn von der Verwaltung kontaktiert?
Gruß
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-30 13:25:54+00:00): Hi Dinaky,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
ratrun (2022-06-29 16:09:19+00:00): Hello! 

Can you please explain what you tried with these changesets? It looks as you intentionally duplicated a lot of ways which are now found as errors by openstreetmap inspector tool: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=47.84446&lat=-22.10744&zoom=11&overlays=snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1 

From my point of view all the changesets described as "modifier un chemin non fusionner" need to be reverted.
marczoutendijk (2022-07-05 09:57:04+00:00): The DWG received a reply from Dinaky.
They had a connection problem and are now trying to solve the situation.
If this is not happening by the end of this week, the DWG shall revert the relevant changesets.

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-27 11:01:16+00:00): Have they replied?

Problems mentioned in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6117 are still not resolved
marczoutendijk (2023-03-27 11:11:01+00:00): User didn't edit the last 9 months...
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-27 12:50:40+00:00): they could still email/PM/write somewhere else...

And given "If this is not happening by the end of this week, the DWG shall revert the relevant changesets" I think the plan was to revert edits if they would not reply?

(or maybe it was done and remaining debris can be cleaned and deleted?)
ratrun (2023-03-27 15:14:30+00:00): From what I remember that user has fixed the mentioned duplicates. You can also see this in his latest changeset comments here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Dinaky/history
Rus Ionut (2023-01-23 11:59:41+00:00): Salut!

Știi cumva dacă străzile Grigore Andreescu și D. I. Berechet mai au sens unic pe porțiunea aceea? Pentru ca acum sunt blocate dacă Strada Republicii e pietonală.

Merci,

Ionuț
somix (2022-06-28 11:28:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. Ремонт компьютеров это не название.
J_Doe (2022-06-28 11:59:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. На вывеске - просто "Компьютеры". Не думаю, что будет лучше написать так, поскольку это не отражает деятельности фирмы.
somix (2022-06-28 12:15:17+00:00): В name нужно писать уникальное название.
Для того, что написано на вывеске есть тег inscription, а для того, чтобы описать, чем занимается организация - description.
J_Doe (2022-06-28 17:15:40+00:00): Здесь нет уникального названия.
Что касается тегов, то это, конечно, прекрасно, что в OSM их миллион. Также прекрасно (для кого-то) вести с помощью OSM базу данных всего и вся. И совсем превосходно, что мы "не рисуем под рендер". Вот только вопрос: а для чего мы вообще рисуем? Лично мне нужно только одно: чтобы найти потом объект на карте. А сколько у этого объекта тегов, которые никто нигде не показывает и не использует, это…не очень важно.
Leo Slager (2022-06-28 11:16:33+00:00): reverted with my changeset 
122952334
conradoos (2022-08-25 11:59:02+00:00): Cześć, co jest w tym miejscu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074184248 ?
Bo area=yes to za mało. Trzeba konkretnie wskazać, co to za miejsce.
magik1969 (2022-08-25 18:55:08+00:00): Cześć,
To plac techniczny/gospodarczy wykorzystywany głównie przez pracowników leśnych. Jest na tyle duży, dobrze utrzymany i jednocześnie charakterystyczny, że postanowiłem go zmapować. Niestety, nie znalazłem odpowiednich tagów, żeby opisać go dokładniej.
conradoos (2022-08-27 07:13:22+00:00): OK, to zmieniłem na landuse=industrial i industrial=forestry (bo to chyba jednak przemysł leśny). Jednocześnie dodałem ten obszar (jako inner) do relacji z lasem, więc teraz będzie się renderował na różowo bez nałożonych drzew na nim.
KVI0n (2022-06-28 11:31:19+00:00): mistake: #mapbox_linters_greece
armitageone (2022-07-22 09:54:33+00:00): Поправил Скалу Кольцо, не достопримечательность, а natural=arch.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
abakus_uploader (2022-06-28 22:32:20+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
map per (2022-07-16 19:52:55+00:00): Hallo ATS_Alpenregion,

in OSM werden auch Wege bei denen das Betreten unerwünscht oder verboten ist eingezeichnet (weil ja in der Realität ein Weg existiert). Die Zugangsbeschränkungen werden dann mit access=discouraged (unerwünscht) oder access=no (verboten) eingetragen.

Siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96344230, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3241916

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
ATS_Alpenregion (2022-07-17 10:05:34+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis! Hier haben wir das "Problem" dass der Weg tatsächlich physisch entfernt wurde/wird - es wird Gras gesät etc. um diese Pfadspur die die letzten Jahre entstanden ist und wieder und wieder nachgelaufen wird wieder zu renaturieren. Somit wäre der Weg m.e. nicht als "existent" anzusehen - ist aber natürlich ein schwieriges Thema. 
Grüße
Becky Candy (2022-06-29 15:59:38+00:00): To ensure buildings/highways do not cross or connect, zoom right in and carefully place the building corners. If a road overlaps a building you should feel free to adjust the position of the road before mapping the building. Thank you for mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122954156
archie (2022-06-28 12:26:33+00:00): Var vänlig och försök att undvika sånt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9853198355. Tack!
cserpell (2022-06-28 20:04:45+00:00): Hola. Se agregó una oficina, es posible conocer el nombre?
archie (2022-06-28 12:23:58+00:00): Hej, vill du vänligen vara en aning mera noggrann, tack! Den här vägen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074200010) har du kopplat till skogsgränsen istället för till tvärsgående vägen. Du nitar även ihop vägar med landuse-gränser med gemensamma noder, vilket skapar problem. Så vänligen se upp med vad du gör och hur du gör det, tack!
Martin Borsje (2022-06-28 16:38:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
abakus_uploader (2022-06-28 22:32:21+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2022-07-09 09:57:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Please be sure that you map buildings.
Here, you mapped trees as buildings. A building is more recognizable by the form, a shadow next to it and the color of the roofs



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122954915
MxxCon (2022-06-29 22:30:54+00:00): Hello.
Please note, as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description the description field MUST NEVER be used for advertising or other promotional messaging. As such this POI is going to be updated to remove that.
Additionally, changeset comments must never be used for spamming. They must contain brief explanation of your edits so that other editors better understand what you are trying to do.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122955073
pitscheplatsch (2022-06-29 06:09:34+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122955172
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:50:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
pitscheplatsch (2022-06-29 06:09:40+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122955147
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:28:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:30:39+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14304034 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software).

Best regards
pitscheplatsch (2022-06-29 06:10:15+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122955555
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:53:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
pitscheplatsch (2022-06-29 06:10:26+00:00): partly revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122955532
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
MxxCon (2022-06-29 02:51:41+00:00): Hello.
Did you import this data from somewhere? It so, do you have their permission and/or does their license allows that data to be imported into OSM?
What are all those ref tags in each of those pois?
addr:country	tag in many POIs is just wrong. It must be in ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 (two letter country code in upper case).
addr:full	tag is also inconsistent in all those pois. Sometimes street name is abbreviated, sometimes it's not; sometimes it's in ALL CAPS, sometimes it's not. Generally it's best to properly break it out into addr:housenumber and addr:street tags for maximum clarity.
Similarly, addr:city is inconsistent. Sometimes it's normal, sometimes SCREAMING IN ALL CAPS.
Additionally, as documented in the wiki, "name=" tag should not be used as a description. Unfortunately, that's what you put into each of those usps drop boxes.
For your Cricket and Boost POIs "branch=" is wrong. "Authorized Retailer" and "Premier Store" are not proper branch names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122955722
Rock-a-Villa (2022-06-29 14:09:43+00:00): Hello MxxCon,

For the data source, I used https://alltheplaces.xyz , which releases the data under a creative commons license. It allows for copying, modifying, and distribution without the need to ask for permission to use said data. 
As for the tagging of the pois, I'll be sure to remove/fix any incorrectly formatted or bad data.
Szymson (2022-06-29 09:29:05+00:00): Drobne modyfikacje w kartografii to nie jest opis który oddaje w pełni istoty zmian jakie dokonujesz tutaj. Przestań proszę kopiować ciągle ten sam opis i bardziej precyzyjnie opisuj to, co zmieniasz tak, żeby inni użytkownicy nie musieli się domyślać o co chodzi.