piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ovruni (2021-01-09 07:12:00+00:00): Las imágenes mas actuales con la que cuenta el proyecto OSM para varias zonas de Perú son las imágenes de Maxar [0], aunque en algunos casos menos claras que las de Bing y en algunas zonas de ciudad las de Esri [1] son de mayor calidad, aunque tal vez menos actuales que las dos anteriores. En caso tengas acceso a la zonas en cuestión y te encuentres interesado, existen proyectos como OpenStreetCam [2] o Mapillay[3] que colaboran con OSM permitiendo visualizar imágenes panorámicas, lo que podría ayudar a que mas adelante otros usuarios puedan también corroborar lo que se encuentra en la zona o añadir mayor información, las imágenes que se hayan subido de manera colaborativa se pueden visualizar en la web de OSM, mediante la opción "Datos del mapa" -> "Capas de fondo" (en el lado derecho). Vendría a ser algo similar con el servicio de Street View de Google, sin embargo las imágenes de los proyectos de Google no pueden usarse en OSM por un problema relacionado a los derechos de autor. [4] Con respecto a las etiquetas "name", se habia usado para poner nombres como "Futuro parque en Nuevo Chacupe II", "Parque y cancha de fútbol de Urb. Mirasol" o "Pérgolas y zona de juegos de Urb. Mirasol".

Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maxar
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Esri
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:OpenStreetCam
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mapillary
[4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Preguntas_frecuentes#.C2.BFY_por_qu.C3.A9_no_utilizo_Google_Maps_para_mis_datos.3F
Dimacn (2021-01-09 07:12:41+00:00): Пожалуйста скажите что вы отметили на карте?
watmildon (2023-08-09 03:24:30+00:00): Do you happen to know which map roulette task this was? It seems to have left a wake of OSM items with 2 different GNIS identifying fields (ex: gnis:feature_id and ndh:gnis_id)
phidauex (2023-08-09 03:47:07+00:00): Yes, it was from this task I created a few years ago: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/3428

At the time, there was no consensus on what to do with the GNIS tags, and we had many cases where there were multiple GNIS IDs referring to the same object (I know that isn't supposed to be possible, but we found it was quite common - maybe from imports of different versions/eras of the database?).

The decision at the time was to simply leave the GNIS and NHD tags in place, unless it was clear to the mapper which ID was the "current/correct" ID, not always easy to determine.

If we have better tools for identifying correct GNIS ids I'd be happy to help with some of the cleanup.
watmildon (2023-08-10 01:53:38+00:00): Got it. We've built some tools that are somewhat sophisticated for matching GNIS records with OSM objects and noticing things that are amiss. We've done some small scale MR tasks with them to help develop the tech and see how painful things are. We have yet to do QA en masse but I'm excited to do that in the nearish future.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/watmildon/diary/401085
https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/50960
phidauex (2023-08-10 02:04:47+00:00): Interesting, I'll take a look and play around with it a bit, I'm glad to see that someone is taking an interest in the GNIS feature ID, it always seemed like a potentially useful tag, marred by several overlapping imports in the past. I've avoided deleting it when I come across it, so I'm glad to see them getting some use. Apologies that this earlier task confused things with the multiple IDs issue.
watmildon (2023-08-10 02:40:45+00:00): No worries! We're all out here doing our best.

Definitely let me know if you have questions. Kai and I are also in the OSMUS Slack where we coordinate a lot of our mapping.
ZeLonewolf (2021-01-09 14:13:55+00:00): Hi, this changeset has broken the Aurora city boundary.
00Sterling (2021-01-10 00:15:37+00:00): Hi. The Aurora city boundary stretches further north so it was incorrect anyway.
00Sterling (2021-01-10 02:27:29+00:00): I see where you fixed it though. Thank you. I moved to this area and it keeps coming up as Denver.
ZeLonewolf (2021-01-10 02:35:14+00:00): No problem.  Boundaries are pretty tricky to do in iD.  The validation for them isn't great and it's easy to end up with a gap.  Feel free to reach out if you ever need any help with boundary work.

Also, feel free to join us on the OSM US Slack, https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ channel #local-colorado
Nordøk (2021-08-25 19:13:17+00:00): Please change the tagging these roads to highway=residential
ovruni (2021-01-09 06:40:21+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios sucede lo mismo que con el conjunto de cambios 97198594.[0] ¿Puede indicar cual es la fuente que indica la existencia de estas vías? En caso tenga interés en realizar alguna importación puede revisar las directrices de importación. [1] Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo en OSM, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe

Saludos

[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97198594
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importaci%C3%B3n/Directrices
sykul (2021-01-10 09:34:55+00:00): Hi. This is accurately a parking entrance for underground bicycle parking. I'm going to create a relation to better reflect reality.
MxxCon (2021-01-09 21:55:46+00:00): Hello.
Please be aware that you CAN NOT under any circumstances use Google Maps, Google Earth, Google Streetview for mapping in OpenStreetMap! It is a copyright violation! You can not use it for reference, for verification, for validation, for confirmation. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
TD6778 (2021-01-09 23:15:32+00:00): AH, thank you I didn't know that. I appreciate you pointing that out.
user_5359 (2021-01-10 16:22:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
bjc (2021-03-26 21:27:16+00:00): Hi OpenBoys
Kurz eine Frage zu diesem Punkt. Hast du Probleme diese Adresse zu erfassen oder ist dies ernst gemeint?
Wenn es ein probelm gibt dann ist das nicht die beste Idee das so zu lösen, ich helfe dir sonst gerne
Müszi (2021-01-10 10:41:24+00:00): Szia!

Telkibánya környékén rajzoltam, és az ellenőrzés kidobta, hogy egy vonal (way #893597572) nincs semmilyen útnak jelölve ("untagged way"). Gyanítom, hogy szekérút vagy ösvény lesz, de te jártál arra, te tudod. Javítod légyszi?

-- 
Zsolt ("Müszi")
Claudius Henrichs (2021-01-24 10:22:14+00:00): Hi Tony,
Can you help me understand based on which criteria you changed the classification of Seoul Street? Both the built as well as the importance as a connector of Northern Tehran to the city's business center deem its classification as a primary road.
Best,
Claudius
tony_hny (2021-01-26 00:53:05+00:00): Hi Claudius. I thought it was similar in build to secondary roads like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61650167 and the trunk running parallel to it is the main connector. However I see what you mean, keeping it as primary will add some distinction to the network. I’ll talk to you the next time I see a classification I have questions about. Thanks for reaching out.
Frans S (2021-01-09 12:04:55+00:00): Hi Ralph. Can you take a second look to this changeset?. You used both Bing and project imagery, but at the end there is still an offset and mappings which are not shown on the project imagery.  Check Esri world (clarity) as well. gives a better contrast but also a big offset
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97201783
russdeffner (2021-01-10 02:53:47+00:00): Frans, this is Russ but no worries :) Thanks for the heads up, I aligned everything to the existing mapping but forgot the last step to move into alignment with MAXAR. Fixed now.
mariotomo (2021-01-13 22:56:52+00:00): hola. disculpa, pero no entiendo la relación entre el comentario y los cambios.
Alvarado2510 (2021-01-21 23:10:58+00:00): Buenas noches, ¿Que necesitas que te aclare?
mariotomo (2021-01-21 23:39:25+00:00): el comentario al conjunto de cambio suena » Corregimiento de la Colorada, para el censo del 2010 con 2128 habitantes« y no le veo relación con los cambios.
Alvarado2510 (2021-01-21 23:43:27+00:00): Revisare, pero creo que deje mi sesión abierta, no recuerdo por que ese comentario.
mariotomo (2021-01-13 23:03:14+00:00): hola.  por favor revisa qué quiere decir la etiqueta que utilizaste "building:min_level".  no puedo mejorarlo pues me falta información, pero verdad este edificio está flotando, dos pisos en el aire?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels
Alvarado2510 (2021-01-21 23:09:02+00:00): Buenas noches, lo uso para identificar el nivel del los edificios, sobre el suelo, ese edificio en particular tiene 2 niveles sobre el suelo, por eso investigue en wiki para añadirle a aquello edificios con nivel superior.
mariotomo (2021-01-21 23:38:15+00:00): o sea que has leido la documentación y confirmas que el edificio está flotando en el aire?
Hedaja (2021-01-17 11:39:22+00:00): Hi
I saw you added off ramps to E470
Right now they are not connected to the Tollway but just to the no accessible service road. Therefore navigation systems wouldn't be able to use the exit.
If the off ramps are not finished yet, best mark them as highway=construction. If they are, you need to disconnect them from the service road and to the tollway (I'd probably delete the service road till the dirt starts and connect it to the new off ramp there.
Another thing is, that you have the ramp as secondary_link right now but they end up connecting to a tertiary road and therefore should be tertiary_link.

If you need assistance let me know.

-Hedaja
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97202096
user_177389 (2021-01-09 15:30:29+00:00): changeset reverted

Please do not change without speaking to DWG first.
eserte (2021-01-10 17:40:49+00:00): Hier gibt's einen Widerspruch zwischen surface und surface:right/left + comment.
StefanHRT (2021-01-10 17:51:20+00:00): Interessant das hier concrete steht, hatte eigentlich Kopfsteinpflaster ausgewählt da dies der Hauptteil des Weges ist. Gleich mal das concret rauslöschen.
eserte (2021-01-10 18:32:02+00:00): 👍
WoodWoseWulf (2021-01-09 21:52:00+00:00): Hi!

Welcome back to OSM :)

I've added more details to this park and playground in the following changeset: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97203542

If you're able to, could you please review it for anything missing or potential errors?

Thanks! 

-Wood
Robercin (2021-01-13 18:53:30+00:00): Dlaczego pozamieniałeś drogi z tertiary na residential i usunąłeś z tagów ich ukryte numery dróg powiatowych?
ScottWalkerAU (2021-01-12 05:19:16+00:00): Hi, you deleted the address data along with the node. I would have expected the removal of business data, leaving address data behind.
ScottWalkerAU (2021-03-06 23:32:21+00:00): This has been partially reverted in #100557104
Frans S (2021-01-09 11:57:00+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here. 
A remark. The project imagery is often rather poor to map from. If you know how to deal with it (and correct offset) select the Esri World (clarity) beta image. Often a better contrast. Use it when you are in doubt about a building.
But be sure to line them up with the project imagery . (there is a rather big offset) 
Please solve the issues as well shown by the Issue triangle.
Also extrapolate the building roofline rather than the treeline where a building is partial hidden by trees
Best regards and keep mapping
mueschel (2021-01-09 14:03:07+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Please spend a bit of time to understand how relations work in OSM. The best is to look at existing hiking trails.

A relation is always a set of already existing ways - adding additional ways without tags, overlapping with roads and paths, is not the right approach.

I'm afraid we have to revert many of the changes you did so far.
Naphi (2021-09-28 13:56:03+00:00): Bonjour,
pourrais-je savoir d'où viennent vos sources pour les modifications que vous fait sur les rues suivantes en "living_street" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
(zones de rencontre : rues où les piétons ont absolue priorité sur tous les véhicules à moteur et limitation à 20km/h). Habitant de la presqu'île et étant encore passé par le lieu-dit ''Lasné'' ce matin, je n'ai vu aucun panneau de signalisation ne l'indiquant sur place (en date d'aujourd'hui 28/09/2021).
Identifiants : 
-236840718, 231930171, 613814239, 613814238, 883266957, 883267573, 176967355, 376600849, 176967353 et 176967351.
Ce ne sont pour moi que des rues résidentielles.
En attendant de vous lire et de savoir si je peux faire les corrections,
cordialement.
M. Cochard 
PS : si vous connaissez le coin, le centre de St-Colombier est en "living_street" (indiquées sur place).
Thomas Citharel (2021-09-28 14:31:37+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est effectivement une erreur, j'ai lu Street Complete trop vite.

Tout le lieu-dit de Lasné est en zone 30 à l'ouest de la Route de Saint-Colombier, mais ça n'en fait pas des living_street.

Merci pour le signalement, et merci pour la proposition d'effectuer les corrections.

Je n'ai eu l'occasion de passer à St-Colombier qu'une fois rapidement depuis les travaux, donc je n'y ai pas encore jeté un œil.
Frans S (2021-01-09 11:30:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here. A remark. The project imagery is often rather poor to map from. If you know how to deal with it (and correct offset) select the Esri World (clarity) beta image. Often a better contrast. Use it when you are in doubt about a building.
But be sure to line them up with the project imagery . (there is a rather big offset) Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97205440
joost schouppe (2021-05-18 13:52:33+00:00): Looks good to me
user_5359 (2021-01-10 16:20:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-06 00:27:09+00:00): Where this import is documented?

Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?

Note that not discussed imports may be reverted by anyone.

(if that import is dicussed and documented - please, link its documentation page in every changeset)
Marius Geitle (2021-02-06 00:34:34+00:00): This import has been going on for years(I believe 6 years now), and is documented thoroughly on the Wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway

Yes, I am aware of the guidelines.
maro21 (2021-01-09 19:07:54+00:00): Dlaczego połączyłeś dwa budynki w jeden gubiąc informacje? Pierwszy budynek został zbudowany w 1930, a druga część dobudowana w 2009. Teraz jest, że budynek powstał w 2009, co jest nieprawdą. Podana przeze mnie data 2009-04-25 odnosi się do centrum handlowego, a nie budynków. Poza tym centrum handlowe nie zajmuje całego budynku, tak jak jest to teraz zaznaczone, bo są tu też biura, dlatego Renoma była jako węzeł.
Mordechai23 (2021-01-09 19:56:43+00:00): Z tym obszarem centrum handlowego to rzeczywiście do poprawy. Informacje ze start_date budowy budynku i inne przeniosłem na building:part, więc żadne dane nie przepadły. Nie rozumiem za to, czemu od razu zrobiłeś revert zamiast poczekać na moją odpowiedź, mimo że wiesz, że odpisuję na komentarze do moich changesetów. Tym samym marnujesz całą moją pracę dla jednej nie pasującej ci rzeczy, którą mogłem szybko poprawić jakbyś chwilę poczekał
GeoJess (2021-02-04 19:43:12+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for all of your contributions to OSM! I hope you are having a good day :) I wanted to ask about this changeset since it looks like the changes may have unintentionally removed way 31005049 out of the map. There used to be a water polygon there, but it has been removed.

Hope to hear from you soon,
Jesspher
Marius Geitle (2021-02-04 20:25:10+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to my attention, Jesspher.

I have now corrected the problem.

I wish I could say what caused this problem, but as of now, its a bit of a mystery to me. I actually keep recordings of my import sessions in order to improve my import process, and this water was actually there when I uploaded. As of now, the most likely reason is a glitch in JOSM, but I need to check to make sure none of the scripts I use did something weird with the files before I conclude.

Have a nice day, and don't hesitate to reach out if you encounter any more issues with the import.

Best regards,
Marius
Frans S (2021-01-09 11:10:43+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Difficult mapping here due to the poor Imagery. We have to deal with that.
Your mappings are accurate and squared.
Just 1 issue. You mapped also a vehicle on a road. Try to avoid that. 
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97206690
SK53 (2021-01-09 12:56:43+00:00): Hi,

Many thanks for taking the trouble to correct details in this area. 

For permissive paths you can make the details more precise by adding foot=permissive (and bicycle & horse if that is appropriate), rather than just using a label. This information can be directly used by apps. You can just set access=permissive, but this notionally would apply to all viable transport forms so is not recommended.

In general if a path exists on the ground, but is not publicly accessible we general recommend leaving it but changing the access status to private. This is because the path is likely to be added again if it is visible in aerial imagery or someone passing through sees it. The downside is that not every app using OpenStreetMap data respects this information.

For roads, driveways & tracks accessing properties probably the best access choice is destination. A number of delivery firms (notably Amazon Logistics) now use OSM for planning & routing delivery drivers.

I hope this is of some use.

Regards,

Jerry aka SK53

PS. I'm intrigued that there is a building marked "Filter House" by New Hall. Does this belong to the water company?
Thebobster (2022-04-22 08:10:00+00:00): Hi Jerry.
Thanks for your message and sorry for the delay in responding. 
How do you add " foot=permissive?
I have tried by highlighting the path however when a box appears it does not allow me to select permissive. 
As the pathways around the woodland are permitted for use by the landowner but can be closed from time to time for the use of youth groups and safeguarding, it is important that this is shown.
Cheers.
Mark aka The bobster
SK53 (2022-04-22 11:24:43+00:00): Hi Mark,

It looks like Casey Boy has already changed it to permissive (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893627652#map=19/53.66967/-2.29298). Probably an advantage of sharing these discussions, as someone else interested in accurate mapping of paths will pick it up.

Jerry
Frans S (2021-01-09 11:26:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here. A remark. The project imagery is often rather poor to map from. If you know how to deal with it (and correct offset) select the Esri World (clarity) beta image. Much cleared on several spots.
But be sure to line them up with the project imagery . (there is a rather big offset) Best regards and keep mapping
JsLauZx6rF (2021-04-17 11:32:17+00:00): Die Änderung am Weg 755010081, v6 ist leider nicht korrekt.
Die Wegführung ist nicht wie in V6 hinterlegt sonder ist wie in Version V5 korrekt kartiert. Wie ist es möglich diesen Teil des Änderungssatzes rückgängig zu machen?
skyper (2021-04-19 17:58:08+00:00): Habe nach Absprache Teile dieses Änderungssatzes zurück gesetzt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103215517
Was noch einmal überprüft werden sollte sind die genauen Zugangsbeschränkungen der B3 und des Trottoirs auf der östlichen Seite (bicycle=use_sidepath ?) sowie die Verbindungen zwischen Trottoir und des Fußweges direkt daneben.

Der eigentliche Revert war einfach, mit ein bisschen Übung und es war im Endeffekt auch nur eine Route-Relation betroffen:
1. Weg 755010081 laden
2. Weg in neue Ebene zurücksetzen
3. In neuer Ebene alle Wegpunkte auswählen und ebenfalls zurücksetzten, aber dieses Mal in gleiche Ebene.
Dann wäre noch die Mitgliedschaft in der Fahrradroute gekommen, aber, da ich das Trottoir nun separat eingetragen habe, müsste ich mich um diese Relation eh gesondert kümmern, wobei es hier auch nur ein Austausch von dem einem Weg war.

Vergesse immer wie viel Erfahrung im Umgang mit JOSM und mehreren Ebenen sowie eventuell verschiedenen Versionsnummern von Objekten steckt.

Grüße skyper
Frans S (2021-01-09 11:20:33+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. The project imagery is often rather poor to map from
If you know how to deal with it (and correct offset) select the Esri World (clarity) beta image. Much cleared on several spots.
Best regards and keep mapping
habi (2021-01-09 10:59:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
joost schouppe (2021-05-18 13:51:45+00:00): Looks good, bxl-forever added clarifying tags though. Some people prefer adding parking conditions to the roads themselves, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane
habi (2021-01-09 10:59:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits/Habi
JochenOSM (2021-01-11 14:16:54+00:00): Hallo simbl,
du hast eingetragen dass die Wenschdorfer Straße für Fußgänger gesperrt ist. Warum? Aus meiner Sicht war das mit sidewalk=no vorher korrekt.
eggie (2021-01-09 12:02:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
DressyPear4 (2021-01-10 21:14:46+00:00): Olá, não há necessidade de colocar um nome genérico na via, se não tiver pode deixar sem.
Nomes também não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta.
syntex (2021-09-26 14:49:09+00:00): Chyba źle skalibrowałeś, wszystko jest przesunięte
syntex (2021-09-26 15:08:10+00:00): Cały ten obszar jest do poprawy
Frans S (2021-01-09 13:00:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here 
A remark . Please map buildings individually. You collect neighbouring buildings and map them as 1. 
Another  remark. The project imagery is often rather poor to map from. If you know how to deal with it (and correct offset) select the Esri World (clarity) beta image. Often a better contrast. Use it when you are in doubt about a building.
But be sure to line them up with the project imagery . (there is a rather big offset) 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1OXAkrF3_bhfSnADy77H8L8BIuavZ2g0z/view?usp=sharingBest regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2021-01-09 12:11:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here. A remark. The project imagery is often rather poor to map from. If you know how to deal with it (and correct offset) select the Esri World (clarity) beta image. Often a better contrast. Use it when you are in doubt about a building.
But be sure to line them up with the project imagery . (there is a rather big offset) Best regards and keep mapping
Futur3r (2021-01-09 12:36:17+00:00): Salut, est-ce qu'il y a vraiment une station de réparation à cet endroit ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97209178
Viv Etd (2021-01-09 16:11:23+00:00): Salut, oui, il y a bien une station d'auto-réparation de vélos + pompes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97209178
Futur3r (2021-01-09 17:31:21+00:00): Oké, j'ai rajouté la pompe; FYI c'est le tag : service:bicycle:pump=yes 

Merci pour l'ajout :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97209178