piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
happychanbb (2020-11-04 11:58:19+00:00): @Kovoschiz
https://www.map.gov.hk/gm/
my research is from hk government map

In Hong Kong, noone will call / give the name of Y-interchange.
Only will name large size of system Interchange, not each of the Y-interchange.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-10 10:43:01+00:00): 1. As I mentioned, that is copyrighted, and shows different things. 
2. The name of the interchange is put on the point of exit. This is the standard practice. Plus, there's no obvious tags for a single interchange feature object either.
Kovoschiz (2020-11-03 11:34:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93460790
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93460846
Frans S (2020-11-03 11:40:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping
frosm (2021-01-10 20:24:03+00:00): Bonjour,
je vous vois créer plein de note puis les fermer sans modification réelle dans la base de donnée.
qu'essayez-vous de faire ?
par exemple la dernière note parle d'un bois privé : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2493052
c'est ambigu parce qu'on ne sait pas si vous parlez de la propriété ou de l'accès : voulez renseigner que cela appartient à un propriété faire privé ?
ou voulez-vous dire qu'un des chemins d'accès a un panneau "accès privé" ? si oui quel chemin ? à l'endroit de la note il n'y a pas de chemin renseigné.
chlenix (2020-11-03 07:17:14+00:00): Основна дорога, що з’єднує два міста типу place=town, повинна бути щонайменше highway=secondary
chlenix (2020-11-03 07:21:07+00:00): У виключних випадках можлива зміна класу доріг +/- 1 рівень в залежності від важливості дороги та/або якості дорожнього покриття порівняно із сусідніми дорогами.
chlenix (2020-11-03 07:22:40+00:00): Так же: "Дорога, що з’єднує дві дороги типу highway=primary, повинна бути щонайменше highway=secondary."
Tomas Straupis (2020-11-03 08:06:23+00:00): Nereikia nuimti nuo ligoninės PASTATO žymos „building“ - pastatas.
frosm (2020-11-14 10:01:06+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
merci pour votre contribution
pour l'exploitant, on le met sur la ligne de bus.
pour le retrait de la ligne de bus, c'est toute la ligne qui est supprimée ? vous n'avez supprimé qu'un arrêt.
bonne continuation :-)
user_12103446 (2020-11-14 16:26:25+00:00): Bonjour,
En effet, je cherche à supprimer la ligne 601, qui n'existe plus depuis la rentrée. Mais je n'y parviens pas…

Cordialement
frosm (2020-11-14 16:38:09+00:00): les relations de bus dans l'éditeur web, ce n'est pas le plus facile pour commencer :)
elle est simplement trop grande que pour être supprimée depuis cet éditeur.
souhaitez-vous que je le fasse ? dans les 2 sens ?
ou souhaitez-vous que je dirige vers un éditeur plus approprié nomé JOSM mais moins pratique pour débuter ?
user_12103446 (2020-11-14 16:54:09+00:00): Je préfère que vous faites cette démarche à ma place.
Je n'ai pas le bon ordinateur pour travailler correctement sous ce logiciel.
KPull (2020-11-04 11:23:13+00:00): Hi! I see you've modified the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/487904111 but it has no tags. What does this way represent?

Also the stop sign added here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8077007982 appears to be facing the wrong direction since vehicles traveling 'backwards' and turning on Triq il-Belle Isle would have to stop, I presume.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93464374
BCNorwich (2020-11-03 10:22:01+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder if the path is really a cutting as regards OSM? Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cutting

Regards Bernard.
Rory Crispin (2020-11-03 11:53:36+00:00): You're right, I've fixed this in 93480983
Tomas Straupis (2020-11-04 05:52:46+00:00): Taurija jei jau turi pavadinimą, tai čia upeliukas, o ne griovys. Tai grąžinau ditch->stream.
Canal des Pangalanes (2021-06-07 17:58:21+00:00): Hi Saigon,

which imagery have do you used for https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=93465811 ?
GrahamTD (2022-10-19 07:38:35+00:00): Can there be a space between Thomas and More please.
VitalieS (2020-11-13 06:13:45+00:00): Bună,
Cunoașteți cum se numește acest dentist?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93466541
user_5359 (2020-11-08 08:41:04+00:00): Hello! Did you understand the meaning of https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4128 ?
user_5359 (2020-11-08 08:42:54+00:00): හෙලෝ! Https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4128 හි තේරුම ඔබ තේරුම් ගත්තාද?
VictorIE (2020-11-03 14:13:21+00:00): Hi,

This one needs a name. :) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11827398
Iko IRM-RV (2023-04-03 07:38:03+00:00): Hi, Thank you for your contributions to OSM, but I see from this changeset that you modified ways (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/695033475), and this appears self-intersection error. Could you please check this error and fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93468370
Kovoschiz (2020-11-03 11:38:06+00:00): Don't delete it unless it's already demolished for a long time out of view
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93468532
Virgile1994 (2020-11-12 15:16:56+00:00): Salut.
Quelles sources as-tu utilisées pour tes modifications "Pistes cyclables - Grenoble" ?
Il se trouve que tu as, j'ai l'impression, supprimé un aménagement récent (~printemps-été 2020) au croisement entre le Cours Jean Jaurès et les rues Camille Desmoulins / Joseph Rey pour re-cartographier l'aménagement qu'il y avait avant.
J'ai pas le temps de vérifier un à un tes autres changements si tu a fais d'autres suppressions du genre, y'a-t-il eu d'autres endroit où il se peut que tu aies fait ce genre d'erreurs ?
Cordialement,
Virgile.
ketchupi_67 (2020-11-12 17:27:53+00:00): Bonjour Virgile,
Je me suis basé sur ma dernière venue à Grenoble début 2020, ainsi que sur les dernières vue Google Maps de 2019. En ce qui concerne l'aménagement en question, il s'agit de la traversée du Cours Jean Jaurès par la Chronovélo 2. Il me semble bien qu'elle est fléchée de la sorte, mais tu peux remodifier si ça te semble non conforme.
Dans tous les cas, j'ai corrigé beaucoup d'erreur de OSM correspondant le tag "bicycle=designated" affecté à des itinéraires piétons, ce qui signifie normalement qu'une signalisation verticale (panneau) ou un fléchage au sol spécifique au vélo est utilisée pour baliser l'itinéraire, ce qui n'était pas le cas dans tous les cas de figure modifié. Par ailleurs, beaucoup de bandes cyclables étaient déclarées par "cycleway=lane", ce qui implique de manière implicite des bandes cyclables de chaque côté de la rue. Lorsque ce n'était pas le cas, j'ai modifié par "cycleway:left/right=lane". Ces résultats sont visibles sur CylcOSM.

Au plaisir d'échanger avec toi,
Bonne soirée,
Virgile1994 (2020-11-12 18:05:14+00:00): J'ai vu que tu as remplacé pas mal de "cycleway=opposite_lane" par "cycleway:left=opposite_lane". Il me semblait que le tag privilégié aujourd'hui était "cycleway:left=lane" + "oneway:bicyle=no" non ?
Diacritic (2022-01-16 11:07:26+00:00): Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment
bxl-forever (2020-11-08 22:33:05+00:00): Hello,
Just one thing: please try to be very careful when working with ways used by buses.
Your changeset broke De Lijn 241 towards Brussels and it created a strange situation, with several ways moved further inside the route relation.
I fixed it.
wardmuylaert (2020-11-12 15:39:51+00:00): Ah damn, I thought I did it right with removing and readding. Is there somewhere I can read up on what I did wrong?
pitscheplatsch (2020-11-04 06:27:19+00:00): Hallo vuvan2611, willkommen bei OSM.

Darf ich fragen, was die Kartenergänzung abbilden soll?

Danke & Viele Grüße

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Loren Maxwell (2024-12-29 00:21:39+00:00): This changeset appears to be vandalism.
itineris (2020-11-18 20:35:42+00:00): Szia!

Van valami oka, hogy egy hivatalos besorolása szerint "6214 - Seregélyes-Szabadbattyán összekötõ út"-at visszaminősítesz mezőgazdasági földúttá?  

Az összekötő ("négyszámjegyű") úthálózatot Magyarországon a secondary címkével jelöljük.
A burkolat hiányát pedig a surface=dirt címkével lehet jelezni, a hepehupákat pedig a smoothness-szel.

Üdv:
Ákos
Fecodat (2020-11-18 23:02:44+00:00): Szia!
Sajnos a jelölési szokásokban kevésbé vagyok járatos.
Az érintett szakasz a gyakorlatban egy traktorral is nehezen járható mezőgazdasági földút.
Ha ez navigációs programban aszfaltosnak látszik, akkor nem kevés kellemetlenséget tud okozni. A belsőbárándra bekötő szakasz az a hepehupás kategória, amit említesz, de a híd után az elágazásnál már világ vége van.
Üdv: Feri
itineris (2020-11-19 07:16:47+00:00): Szia!

Átcímkéztem ennek megfelelően. Az útvonaltervezők elvileg max. 10 km/h-val fognak ide tervezni. (Ezt pár nap múlva majd ellenőrzöm.)

Berajzoltam még a 62-es seregélyesi bekötőjénél az új aszfaltozott lehajtókat.

Ákos
Üdv:
Ákos
Fecodat (2020-11-20 16:24:49+00:00): Ha úgy jó akkor ám legyen.
Azt is érdemes tudni, hogy a 63-as főút felől sem lehet eljutni Szabadbattyánba ezen az úton. Vannak jó szakaszok, de végig nem járható.
Tízzel sem.
itineris (2020-11-20 16:31:39+00:00): Szia!

Az így is van jelölve. A középső része a vadásztársaság kezelésébe van adva, és mindkét oldalról sorompóval van lezárva.

Ákos
Fecodat (2020-11-20 17:29:35+00:00): Sajnos ide nem tudom becsatolni, hogy mit lát ebből egy felhasználó, de vissza zoomolva egy frankó vastag főutat.
Szerintem megtévesztő, de elengedtem. :)
Talán ez lehet az oka, hogy sokan nem szívesen használnak OSM alapú térképeket.
Üdv:
Feri
Frans S (2020-11-03 11:38:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project
High buildings need to be mapped in a different  way.
You can see both the roof and a side of a building.
Don't map everything you see.
Map only the roof surface.
Then move this object to where it touches the ground. (the groundplan)
 See as an example this video
https://drive.google.com/file/d/13RTwH7sChRWrG5bIjysF2ripBgh3F5l4/view?usp=sharing

A more extensive video can be find here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs&t=308s

success with mapping
JanezPavelZebovec (2026-03-14 17:03:12+00:00): Živjo!
Bi lahko kot avtor slapu Savinka na OSM morda pomagal razrešiti to opombo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5188368
LP
CloCkWeRX (2020-11-04 08:12:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105577808#map=19/38.46400/27.21749 seems a bit off - accidental reshaping of the building or intentional/different imagery?
Frans S (2020-11-04 08:21:03+00:00): Hello 
Missed this one after squaring more buildings.
I corrected it. Thanks for pointing to this.
Best regards
literan (2020-11-03 17:21:19+00:00): добрый день. Не следует делать общие точки линиям ЛЭП и дорогам на земле, они пересекаются в разных плоскостях. Исправил.
Nikolay Brezin (2020-11-03 17:39:12+00:00): Понял, спасибо. Случайно вышло
frosm (2020-11-14 10:13:43+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
merci pour votre contribution
vous avez ajouté puis supprimé puis rajouté à nouveau des bornes avec des noms, est-ce vraiement le cas ?
bonne continuation :-)
pangoSE (2022-09-10 14:46:03+00:00): Är det skyltat på marken med Hidden Trails?
DoubleK2 (2022-09-12 12:31:03+00:00): Hej pangoSE,

Jag tror inte att det är längre skyltat.
francians (2020-11-03 12:52:11+00:00): Era già in alt_name.. puoi ripristinare?
Grazie
datbrahm (2020-11-03 10:52:20+00:00): Hi,

We have made the edit for this (changeset# 93474689) using the Private Maxar Imagery. If you are local or going to survey this location and find any new changes for this edit. Please make the necessary changes or let us know we will make the edit from our end.

Thanks & Regards,
Brahm Datt
MatthieuGD (2020-11-05 20:47:45+00:00): Bonjour Robert,

Bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap !
Concernant les horaires (clé opening_hours), merci d'utiliser la syntaxe suivante :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours

Ce qui donne plutôt :
10:00-12:30,13:30-19:00

Comme l'activité est saisonnière, j'aurais tendance à dire qu'il faut a minima définir des mois (peut-être même des jours si ce n'est ouvert que le week-end par exemple). Autrement la proposition que je fais considère que c'est ouvert tous les jours de l'année aux horaires proposés.
Diacritic (2022-01-16 11:07:57+00:00): Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment
Mikenjinoda (2021-05-20 05:50:24+00:00): Warum wurde Fahrrad erlaubt? wenn ich mich richtig erinnere, ist auf der Brücke ausdrücklich ein generelles Fahrverbot ausgeschildert.
gallenblog (2021-05-22 17:21:25+00:00): Gemäss Schild verboten. Ist aber Teil aber auch offiziell Teil der Thur-Route Etappe 1.
Mikenjinoda (2021-05-23 09:20:58+00:00): dann wäre bicycle=dismount korrekter, finde ich, habe es soweit geändert. somit ist der Zugang mit Velo zwar erlaubt, jedoch nur schiebend.
osmviborg (2020-11-03 12:42:39+00:00): Hej. Vil du være venlig ikke at påføre adresse oplysninger på bygninger. Det bruges ikke i DK. Tak
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-02-19 08:52:07+00:00): Hi, mjgk
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/866610094) based on maxar premium.
Thank you, happy mapping!
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-02-19 08:53:09+00:00): I also made some changes around this changeset.
Thank you
richlv (2020-11-28 16:32:14+00:00): This changeset damages pharmacy data for the 3rd time.
Reverted in #94951717.
kate_rocketdata (2020-12-08 14:07:14+00:00): thanks, we'll fix it
jimkats (2020-11-04 22:16:25+00:00): Hi, what exactly you changed here? The changeset description doesn't specify. Sr for keeping commenting on your changesets, but I'm skeptical about Kaart's edits, especially after Tugce's edits in my area.
erenozdemir (2020-11-05 06:40:33+00:00): Greetings Jimkats, first of all I checked the one-way tag on the road as I mentioned in the description. Only I offset the road geometry. I haven't made a big change. There may be minor mistakes in the edits we make. In this way, we will pay attention to improving ourselves as much as the feedback. Thank you. Stay healthy.

Eren
ivanbranco (2022-01-05 13:06:58+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/866614582/history

can you check it out please? Former Locality is an invalid place value
Рыженко Леонид Игоревич (2022-01-08 07:51:30+00:00): Найдите старую деревню Кузнецово на карте http://www.etomesto.ru/map-genshtab_n-43/
DoubleA (2021-07-13 19:01:37+00:00): Den tag electrified versteh ich nicht.
FirefighterCGH (2021-07-14 07:17:13+00:00): Da wurde mir anscheinend nur ele vervollständigt, und ich habs‘ ned gemerkt. Habs‘ rausgenommen
ScottWalkerAU (2020-11-04 10:03:34+00:00): Hi! I don't understand how the end result of this change is any different to its original state? The road is now 5 separate ways instead of the original 1, with no variation in tags.
Judging from aerial imagery the turning circles at the end should have been marked as oneway=yes, instead of your oneway=no
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93478065
Aleksandar Matejevic (2020-11-04 12:38:33+00:00): Actually this is a turning loop - A widened area of a highway with a non-traversable island for turning around, often circular and at the end of a road. This should be modeled as a node with a highway=turning_circle key. OSM has a render for it. These segments usually do not have a one-way sign because their usage is to ease access to the houses so it is up to locals how they gonna use it.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2020-11-04 12:46:00+00:00): highway=turning_loop sorry for the mistake in the previous comment
mueschel (2020-11-05 15:50:17+00:00): Hi,
the tag "cycleway:lane:right" doesn't exist.
The correct order is 'cycleway:right:lane'.
The common order of suffixes is given here: 

key
[:left|:right|:both]
[:subkey]
[:hgv|:bicycle|...]
[:lanes]
[:forward|:backward|:both_ways][:conditional]
[:start|:end]

The one and only exception is "parking:lane:left:..." and "parking:condition:left:..." where the subkey is in front of the side.
Carto'Cité (2020-11-05 16:01:27+00:00): Thank you for this kind reminder  :)
Charles de Carto’Cité
Carto'Cité (2020-11-05 16:21:17+00:00): Just fixed - thanks for the notice !
4004 (2020-11-16 00:28:42+00:00): половина из этих supermarket - convenience
kate_rocketdata (2020-12-08 13:42:34+00:00): как определяется это? клиент считает, что все - супермаркет
kate_rocketdata (2020-12-08 14:16:25+00:00): не могли бы Вы подсказать, куда Вам лучше всего отправлять наши импорты на проверку перед выгрузкой на карту? на форуме ОСМ не всегда нам отвечают.
4004 (2020-12-08 14:33:13+00:00): клиенту стоит разьяснить градацию тегов в осм, но он слушать не будет. тем не менее, можете спросить у маркетологов клиента - они эту градацию придумали. все маркеты по умолчанию скорее convenience. 
новые вносите как видите, а старые лучше не менять - мелкий магазин вряд ли вдруг станет супермаркетом
4004 (2020-12-08 14:33:45+00:00): мне писать толку мало, я обычно пост фактум смотрю. в телеграме вроде сообщество активно
kate_rocketdata (2020-12-09 06:30:07+00:00): последнюю выгрузку оформила с единым для всех convenience. и в дальнейшем буду этого придерживаться
kate_rocketdata (2020-12-09 06:30:30+00:00): а есть помимо телеграмма какие-нибудь форумы?
4004 (2020-12-09 13:08:36+00:00): есть форум, активность на нем вы уже оценили. возможно есть рассылка, канал в слэке или irc, но это вам стоит спросить в телеграме
kate_rocketdata (2020-12-09 14:07:50+00:00): отлично, спасибо большое! хорошего дня :)
4004 (2020-12-09 15:10:34+00:00): вам спасибо, вы же данные приносите
kate_rocketdata (2020-12-10 06:21:45+00:00): вы помогаете нам стать лучше :)
спасибо)
eggie (2020-11-03 12:35:29+00:00): Dag Richard..  Volgens mij is het zo correct. foot=yes hoeft echter  niet getagd worden op een fietspad. Het is default.
Je kunt het trottoir opnemen in de tagging van het fietspad met sidewalk=left  of right.(ligt aan de richting van de weg) . Een stukje had ik al gedaan. 
Het voetpad zit dus ingebakken in de tagging van het fietspad. 

MVG eggie
mavl (2020-11-12 14:44:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Поступило сообщение о том, что вы небрежно редактируете карту. Пожалуйста, будьте аккуратнее при редактировании.

Владимир Маршинин
Рабочая группа по данным
mavl (2020-11-12 16:44:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94006484 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93479552].
4004 (2020-11-16 00:43:54+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94170517
kate_rocketdata (2020-12-08 13:40:27+00:00): добрый день, можно подробнее причину?
4004 (2020-12-08 14:35:59+00:00): здрасьте, с вашим коллегами обсуждали - зеленые аптеки не подпадают под определение аптек, лекарств или обезболивающего в них не купишь (по крайней мере, на лето 2020 было так).
поэтому они все health food, а местные если что исправляют если ассортимент шире
kate_rocketdata (2020-12-09 06:28:35+00:00): спасибо, помечу и справлю в следующих выгрузках
muchichka_s (2021-01-23 12:48:09+00:00): I do not understand why you underestimated my work? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93469652

My Polish friend who works as a driver asked me to indicate that there is no entry here and send me a photo taken in November, which exactly corresponds to what is on the mapillary. He said nothing about one-way traffic. 

In addition, I read on Wikipedia that in Poland "no entry" sign does not necessarily mean one-way traffic. So maybe in 99% of cases this sign is placed near one-way traffic, but firstly I was told that there is no entrance (and said nothing about one-way traffic), and secondly, I have no such experience on Polish roads

https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Znaki_zakazu

And by the way, where did you get the information about https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11828155 sign. Does it just look very illogical in the current traffic scheme?
pio2_122 (2021-01-23 14:27:42+00:00): I completely fail to understand what the problem is here. Taking into account all the relations you added, it comes out that this road is one-way. Therefore, I have simplified this by replacing all these relations with a single oneway tag on this road. So no restriction has changed.
In fact, a road to be one-way does not have to be marked with a D-3 sign at all, instead there can only be appropriate  prohibitory and mandatory signs at both ends of such road.

>And by the way, where did you get the information about https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11828155 sign.

https://goo.gl/maps/FZR45QwNaAAEAuzD7 - I am aware that this photo is from July 2013 (before the new prohibition signs were put up). Nevertheless, its presence does not cause any conflicts with the new  traffic scheme. Therefore, I have decided to add this restriction to the map. If up-to-date data are available to show that this restriction is no longer in place, an appropriate correction can be made (I will be happy to do this myself).
muchichka_s (2021-01-23 14:52:55+00:00): I do not want to argue with you about whether it is appropriate to put one-way traffic there or not. If you think that's better, then so be it, but if I added one-way traffic, some another mapper could also come and ask me for a source that I don't have. I just wanted to explain to you my motivation, and that based on this I consider the "bad" review, which you left me at https://osmcha.org/changesets/93469652 is unfair

Regarding the sign you added as far as I know, we can't use Google's data for the OSM contribution:

https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/67583/moving-data-from-google-maps-to-osm
pio2_122 (2021-01-23 16:45:53+00:00): Thank you, for your clarification.

Starting with the issue of review on OsmCha - sorry, I've already removed that. It was an obvious mistake on my part. Nevertheless, this changeset was marked as "unintentional" :P
I treat this service as a place for a "to-do" list regarding changes in my region. Such a review basically just means that I need to confirm or correct certain things from the changeset. It is in no way a negative assessment of the user in question (except in cases of obvious vandalism).

Your changes were correct, but something tempted me to simplify the restrictions (probably the KISS principle in the back of my mind...).

Regarding using Google Maps. This article talks about using their satellite images - which I don't do because in my area the images available by default in JOSM are mostly better updated. By the way, I haven't heard that it's even possible to use these images as a layer in the editor.
I try not to use StreetView for OSM purposes too. Also primarily because of the poor timeliness and very good Mapillary images. In this case, I wanted to see what the situation was on the other side of that street so as not to make erroneous changes (even though I know they are old photos). I generally don't make changes when I can't use current photos, but in this case it was a 50/50 situation (current Mapillary photos were available only on one side). However, I am actually considering whether to remove this restriction...
muchichka_s (2021-01-23 17:40:59+00:00): Thanks for understanding, pio2_122.

Have a nice day!