piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
harahu (2024-06-02 21:17:40+00:00): Den er basert på NiB-prosjekt Aurland 2019: https://www.norgeibilder.no/?x=72424&y=6783726&level=17&utm=33&projects=3101&layers=&plannedOmlop=0&plannedGeovekst=0

Ganske tydelig at det i alle fall går et tråkk der. Vanskelig å si om dette er brukt av mennesker eller ei.
jeslop (2022-09-09 11:07:15+00:00): Saludos ddanieru.

Dos preguntas:
- ¿cuál es la fuente de los datos de los nombres de las casas?
- ¿esos nombres son los de los propietarios?

En este último caso, si son los nombres de los propietarios, tienes que borrar esos nombres, no está permitido difundir datos personales en OSM.

Saludos

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
jeslop (2022-09-16 08:39:45+00:00): Dado que después de un tiempo prudencial no ha habido respuesta,  elimino la información problemática: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126253778

Saludos.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
jeslop (2022-09-16 08:40:21+00:00): En otros conjuntos de cambios elimino también el resto de nombres particulares.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
wkdgs (2022-07-05 08:29:24+00:00): Hi,

der Weg wurde eigezeichnet, damit klar ist, dass die Trepper von der Straße aus über den Parkplatz erreicht werden kann. Aktuell kann es sein, dass Router Probleme dabei haben, hier den Weg zu finden.

Könntest du den Weg zur Treppe wieder einzeichnen?
Silva1989 (2022-07-06 11:31:45+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for editing OSM. This changeset covers an exceptionally large area, thus making an evaluation rather difficult to make.
Data quality evaluation tools such as achavi or OSMCha often fail to load changesets that cover geographically vast areas such as this one, so please have this in mind in future edits.
adrianojbr (2022-07-05 00:35:14+00:00): Olá, lzdavi!

Precisei refazer o alinhamento de algumas vias, pois a princípio você usou como fonte somente as imagens do Bing.

Imagens de satélite sempre terão problemas de alinhamento, por isso é importante usar traços GPS para ter mais precisão.

Mais informações em: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing

Abraço!
pantufla (2023-05-18 10:37:54+00:00): Hello, 

Why make changes and add "pridanie objektov" ? its not catalan, its not spanish, its not english. 

Then, if you translate it seems it slovak, ok. But then it's only "objects added". That doesnt say much.

Then, you added two information boards that I cant find on site. Even if they were, these are not necessary to map in my opinion. 

I'm going to proceed and delete these boards.
silversurfer83 (2022-07-04 20:33:53+00:00): Hi Sven,

dickes Danke, dass du u.A. mein Fixme beim Urologen heute schon gemacht hast :)
Eine Bitte: Wenn an einem POI (o.Ä) schon die Kontaktdaten mit dem contact:xy= Schema hinterlegt sind, dann lass die bitte so und ändere das nicht alles auf phone= website= etc.
So geschehen zB hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551509898
Abgesehen davon weiter frohes Mappen und danke für deine Mitarbeit

silversurfer83
felipeeugenio (2022-07-08 00:14:51+00:00): Hola ALonso. Porque el borrado de Landuses? se ven perfecto en el satelite muchos de ellos. Por favor aclarar.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123203972
jaap de vries (2022-07-07 08:24:42+00:00): Dit is een groot bewerkingsgebied, kan je bij een volgende keer wat op wijk niveau dus kleiner mappen?
Frans S (2022-07-09 13:05:03+00:00): Hello. I reverted most of the buildings due to poor mapping quality
Best regards
LockOnGuy (2022-07-04 20:58:33+00:00): Hello eng-abdulla albahrani, Thank you for your edits and being the only one from this town who's actually an active mapper. But can you please make the changeset comment that describes your edits in the changeset not just put your name in the changeset comment? Thanks.
skyper (2022-07-06 16:29:39+00:00): Hallo Jan,
Bitte verwende für Gebäude in BW den Hintergrund "Maps4BW".
Danke und Grüße,
skyper
Frans S (2022-07-09 13:28:04+00:00): Hello. I reverted most of the buildings due to poor mapping quality
Best regards
jnighan (2022-07-04 19:33:42+00:00): Changing Route 82 west of Saybrook Road from motorway link to secondary. The current classification is atypical for such a long segment of a Connecticut State Route to be tagged as a link. It is also unusual for a motorway_link to be this long and be tagged oneway=no. The state plans to sign the offramp towards CT-9 NB as “Exit 1.” This supports removing link status from the ‘main’ highway from which drivers will exit.

Added noname=yes
jnighan (2022-07-04 19:45:53+00:00): Also, this change aligns the road with its CTDOT functional classification of Minor Arterial.
Filip009 (2022-07-05 11:19:09+00:00): Hello, in teh forest we use highway=path not highway=footway until the path is not with asphalt coverage.

Dobrý deň, v lese používame highway=path, nie highway=footway, pokiaľ chodník nie je vyasfaltovaný.
no details provided here (2026-01-29 14:25:40+00:00): Hi - it's best practice to use the existing polygon (which contains historic data and building information) when splitting a terrace into smaller parts.  I have all the info to do this which I didn't have two years ago when I did the original work - see previous messages - and am happy to help.  Thanks.
ndm (2022-07-05 22:14:10+00:00): Please add more details in your changeset comments -- what has been corrected?
literan (2022-07-04 20:35:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075860446/history#map=19/55.63624/37.74255&layers=N

такие паркинги это не surface, а street_side
Frans S (2022-07-10 08:38:54+00:00): 
Hello. I reverted most of the buildings due to poor mapping quality
Best regards
LockOnGuy (2022-07-04 20:42:43+00:00): Hello Bravo Mapper, what is the difference between this and node 2488304891? Regards.
Joseph R P (2022-07-17 21:25:40+00:00): Hello, when adding numbers to secondary state highways, please use the prefix 'SR' rather than 'VA'. 'VA' indicates that the road is a primary state route, which are numbered 1 through 599, and 'SR' indicates that the road is a secondary state route, which are numbered 600 and above. Thanks.
Waaslander (2022-07-05 07:17:42+00:00): Het is beter als je de residential area definieert voor heel het dorp Kieldrecht en niet aanduidt per huizenblok. Dit is een standaard die gehanteerd wordt en is praktisch voor ruimtelijk onderzoek.

Alvast bedankt!
eggie (2022-07-05 06:25:11+00:00): Tag Dirk,   Alle Gebäude sind import aus dem Holländischen Grundbuch.. Bitte nichts ändern.

Grüss und viel Spass mit Mappen,
eggie
mweper (2022-07-08 13:53:25+00:00): Hola. No entiendo, ¿este local es exclusivamente una cerrajería ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:shop%3Dlocksmith )  o una ferretería que además vende llaves ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:shop%3Dhardware )?
SomeoneElse (2022-07-16 14:50:05+00:00): The changeset comment here "Racism efforts reverted..." doesn't really help at all.
Perhaps instead say "This garden is a national statue for a Kurdish hero and clearly needs to have a name that at least contains the Kurdish language".
You've now changed it to a hyphenated version, which is much better.
Best Regards,
Andy
Bravo Mapper (2022-07-23 05:13:58+00:00): Hello Andy. You know why I wrote "Racist Effort" ?   
Since 2016, I have mapped half of the province of Kirkuk. I havent done any violation against population and their language and culture.
This should be respected and known that my naming is accurate.
There are names in Kurdish that cannot be spelt by Arabic alphabet. What we do that time ?
Bravo Mapper (2022-07-23 06:30:57+00:00): I called him Racist because
He refuses to put Kurdish and Arabic names in the TAG "Name".
He wants the map seer to feel that the province is Whole Arab.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-04 20:32:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 123206447, 123205265, 123205951, 123206060.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-16 14:46:29+00:00): Hello, your changeset comment here is "Revert vandal edits by user Bravo Mapper".  Can you explain exactly what the problem was?  Looking at the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631551001/history it just looks like there is a disagreement over the language(s) that should be used in the name tags.  This isn't vandalism, and calling it vandalism doesn't help anyone.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-16 15:02:02+00:00): Hello SomeoneElse, He was deleting stuff like https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123208070     
and adding duplicates like    
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123579441     
And     
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123546675      
And       
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123546032
And      
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123519224      
And     
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123205265     
And     
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123190588    
And    
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123150865          
And many other duplicates.
I tried to communicate with him but he don't listen and don't answer..    
Regards.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-16 15:16:53+00:00): @LockOnGuy From looking at 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2488265639/history , it appears that you started that particular edit war in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120405986 - before that the name tags were mostly settled.  The current situation is a hyphenated name - that seems like a "least bad" option.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-16 15:22:38+00:00): Most names were Arabic, 2 mappers changed everything,  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Kurdish%20Map%20Lover and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Diss%20a%20pear      
And other mappers map things in Kurdish not in Arabic, for example:   https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123045080         
I try to communicate first but they don't listen or answer.       
Best Regards.
highflyer74 (2022-07-07 17:32:27+00:00): Moin!

Kleiner Hinweis hier: historic=ruins ist eher für historische Dinge gedacht (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Druins).

Wenn ein Gebäude abgebrannt ist, ist es sinnvoller, dass Lifecycle Prefix zu verwenden (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix).

Falls Du noch Fragen hast, melde Dich gern!
santon (2022-07-08 10:54:56+00:00): Habe beim Ändern nicht aufgepasst und wollte building=ruines eintragen. Lifecycle ist auch eine gute Lösung -> geändert
ALu68 (2022-07-09 08:24:00+00:00): Hello MenKauRa,

your usage of the industrial key is not correct: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:industrial

I changed your tags to name or description https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123391387

Regards. Andre
MenKauRa (2022-12-18 18:00:22+00:00): ok.. thank you..
I live in azerbaijan and visit these regions every day.. my corrections generally reflect reality quite accurately.. but i can make a mistake... i will try to correct them..
maraf24 (2022-07-04 21:29:21+00:00): Źródło?
Budowa ruszyła?
Yunkers (2022-07-05 08:31:31+00:00): Wszystkie etapy trasy są w fazie projektowania. Do tego każdy z etapów będzie zakańczany w innym czasie. Więc do wycofania. Postępy można sprawdzić tutaj https://s1-myslowice-bielsko.pl/index.html
maraf24 (2022-07-06 16:41:20+00:00): Dzięki, wycofałem.
gscscnd (2023-08-18 08:11:09+00:00): Związane z <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139956180>, ale problem pojawił się w tym zestawie zmian.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444636574
Do linii przejścia dla pieszych dodałeś tag crossing=zebra (i w przyszłości crossing:markings=zebra). W ten sposób duplikujemy informacje z węzła (węzłów) highway=crossing, co IMHO nie jest dobrym pomysłem. Parę uwag na ten temat znajdziesz też na Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing#Tagging_crossings_as_ways). Zachęcam do niedodawania tagów crossing* do linii highway=footway (i podobnych) będących przejściami dla pieszych, wystarczą informacje na węzłach.
Hanys1871 (2023-08-20 08:26:44+00:00): Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi, poprawiłem to.
Prawdopodobnie popełniłem ten błąd w innych miejscach, więc będę to na bieżąco poprawiał.
SherbetS (2023-01-26 14:42:53+00:00): Hello sammuell,

on this object:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9866807439

you used the incorrect tag to describe the object. the correct tagging is man_made=mast

The difference is described on the wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dcommunications_tower

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast

I’m trying to fight the increasing incorrect use of this tag, so please use the correct tagging in the future.

Thanks, 
-SherbetS.
joel56dt (2022-07-05 16:29:09+00:00): Hi Fleezing, I changed the 'website' tag to 'contact:facebook' to follow the wiki guidelines
LockOnGuy (2022-07-04 21:20:40+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 123208070.
VictorIE (2022-08-07 23:36:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541570688/history

No such thing as building=office or 
building=offive! :D

You can have building=commercial and office=*
silversurfer83 (2022-07-12 20:53:33+00:00): Hi
schön, dass du nach kurzer wieder hilfst die Datenbank zu verbessern :)
Deine früheren Änderungen mit OSMand waren alle jeweils für sich recht kleinräumig, wärend diese aktuelle Änderung vom Bodensee bis Fehmarn geht. Das ist etwas sehr groß und macht es für andere Mapper unübersichtlich.
Kleiner Hinweis/kleine Bitte: Änderungen in OSMand nicht lange sammeln, sondern hochladen, bevor an anderem Ort wieder etwas geändert wird. Dadurch bleiben die Änderungen kompakt und übersichtlich :)

Grüße
silversurfer83
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-02 11:55:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9866926499/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
skquinn (2025-07-02 12:17:49+00:00): Oops. Should have been a Chevron fuel station. Fixed.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-07 19:29:21+00:00): Hello - I've filled in a gap in NCN422 here in https://www.openstreetmap.org/history - hope this is OK.  Bother sides either side of it are route relation members, so I've assuming that this bit is too.
Best Regards,
Andy
jpennycook (2022-07-07 21:47:38+00:00): Thanks - that's great.  I'm in the process of taking off the "proposed" tagging at the moment.
Mahdi Nameghi (2022-07-06 04:33:54+00:00): سلام 
میشه بفرمایید هدفتون از ایجاد این ریلیشنها چیست؟ چرا نتورک اپن استریت رو مانند ویز ادیت میکنید؟ لطفا ابتدا کاربرد این ریلیشن ها رو فرا بگیرید بعد اقدام به ویرایش کنید.
ممنون از لطف تون
BCNorwich (2022-07-05 07:13:09+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You've tagged the track Way: 38977648 as foot=yes which implies that there is public access on foot here. I wonder if this is correct as it looks to be a farm track only?

I've removed the layer=-1 tag from Way: Bingham Linear Park (38962717) as it's not needed. I also corrected the layer tags on the bridges to layer=1 thus indicating they are above the old railway.

You've added the tags cutting=yes
and embankment=yes to Way: Bingham Linear Park (38946842), this can't logically be correct, it's one or the other, or none. It looks like this section is slightly raised so I've removed the cutting=yes tag.

Regards Bernard.
scruss (2023-05-14 15:11:03+00:00): The west side Kennedy GO platform still isn't open. The rails aren't even in place. The PSV loop to the south lot doesn't exist, and the south parking lot is now temporarily closed for construction
Thorstein Johannessen (2022-07-04 22:40:39+00:00): Her kan en se at hele krysset bygges samtidig. Merk bredde på østgående  bro. https://pano.afgruppen.no/e39km/2022/
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-12-31 13:41:39+00:00): misaligned road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3499084
mariotomo (2022-07-05 18:40:12+00:00): es cierto, la clave "tunnel=-1" estaba errada, pues lo correcto sería "tunnel=culvert". pero porqué no revisas la wiki, no pides ayuda, sólo quitas los avisos sin corregir los errores? pues, porqué?
mariotomo (2022-07-05 18:50:59+00:00): (lo que haces aquí, y haces de manera sistemática, es una corrección de error gramatical, introduciendo un error semántico. es una muy mala práctica.)
Alvarado2510 (2023-01-23 03:31:51+00:00): Buenas noches, mariotomo, me estas pidiendo que no corrija los errores que encuentro, entonces para ti es correcto o buena práctica dejar los errores como estan.
mariotomo (2023-01-23 13:18:14+00:00): tú no estás corrigiendo errores, estás procesando avisos (warning) borrándolos.
para mi es buena practica basar los cambios en la observación, cuando necesario.
Hufkratzer (2022-07-05 09:04:09+00:00): Nach der Website vom RFV Legelshurst scheint https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1075911825 der Turnierplatz zu sein. Wenn das stimmt, sollte der nicht mit leisure=horse_riding gataggt werden, sondern mit leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian. Dafür gibt es in iD den Preset mit Namen "Reitplatz". leisure=horse_riding steht für eine komplette Reitanlage, in diesem Fall die Reitanlage vom RFV. Wenn der Turnierplatz dazu gehört, sollte man die Fläche dieser Reitanlage (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707989865) so vergrößern, dass sie den Turnierplatz mit einschließt.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-07-28 04:22:36+00:00): The service roads were incorrectly changed to footpaths. Please don't change classifications incorrectly.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123211737
keithonearth (2023-02-07 04:12:29+00:00): Are the `highway=cycleway` you added to Fourth separated bike paths, or dedicated lanes painted on the roadway?
the_edge01 (2022-07-05 00:41:21+00:00): Correction: MS transmission lines
MoTaBi (2022-09-07 16:57:00+00:00): Hallo,
bzgl. der Stromleitung. Ich war in Hattenhofen. Da steht ein Mast. Eingezeichnet ist aber eine zweite parallele Leitung ohne Masten... ist das so stimmig?
Schöne Grüße
bigbug21 (2022-09-11 21:01:19+00:00): Wenn ich mich recht entsinne, sollten bei dieser Bahnstromleitung die bestehenden Masten (teils in geänderter Form) mit genutzt werden und eben gerade keine zweite parallele Leitung erstellt werden.
FraukeLeo (2022-09-12 07:38:17+00:00): Dann wird in OSM nur ein power=line gemappt, auch wenn technisch gesehen da zwei Leitungen gemeinsam auf den Masten liegen.
FraukeLeo (2022-09-12 08:28:02+00:00): siehe auch Diskussion unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=76344 (ist immer netter, miteinander und nicht übereinander zu reden)
felipeeugenio (2022-07-05 12:26:07+00:00): Hola. Gracias por sus ediciones. Pero por favor no usar nombres genéricos.
Saludos
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name)
mariotomo (2022-07-05 21:41:20+00:00): hola y bienvenida a OSM. cuidado con añadir información personal, como "yo vivo por acá". :-)
por el resto se ve muy bien, sobre todo para una primera edición.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123212992
nyampire (2022-07-27 11:29:30+00:00): こんにちは。
建物を大量に削除されていたようですが、これはどうした意図でしょうか。

OpenStreetMapは多くの人の手によって作成される世界地図であり、例えばGoogle MapsのMyMapのような個人的なものではありません。
削除については、実際の地物の状況に基づき、慎重に実施くださいますようお願いします。


なお、変更については巻き戻しの処理をさせていただきました。ご了承ください。
Clara013 (2022-07-05 02:43:07+00:00): #ymumsabo
JJIglesias (2022-07-05 16:57:33+00:00): Saludos y gracias por los cambios, como detalle importante de todos esos locales comerciales, seria muy bueno recolectar los nombres y telefonos de esas tiendas, los micromercados no son Supermarket sino se etiquetan como Convenience Store. 
El Mapa es logico necesita informacion precisa, colocando una tienda simplemente agregas un Nodo sin mayor utilidad, pero si colocas Nombre, Calle, Numero en la Calle e informacion de contacto entonces el Mapa SI SIRVE para navegar.
Saludos
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:24:58+00:00): No use el mapa para marcas personales, solo información de relevancia pública.
literan (2022-07-05 18:32:28+00:00): откуда посреди парка парковка для мотоциклов?
willkmis (2022-07-05 15:03:33+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! In this changeset, it looks like you extended a roof to cover the whole area of a gas station. Areas mapped with a building= tag are supposed to match actual buildings on the ground. Here, the buildings are a roof over the fuel nozzles and a separate convenience store building. If you want to indicate that a whole area is part of a business, you can draw an area with the proper amenity= or shop= tag, but don't add a building= tag. I'm going to try and repair this one, but something to watch for in future edits.
Best,
Will
willkmis (2022-07-05 15:13:59+00:00): Reverted in changeset 123240069, with the gas station turned into an area.
ovruni (2022-07-05 06:15:04+00:00): Hola FERNANDO RODRIGO FLORES LLALLIHUAMAN, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado varios edificios no existentes, por lo que revertido este conjunto de cambios. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
jnighan (2022-07-05 14:00:19+00:00): Hi! Please refer to the Connecticut Highway Classification guide and review the schemes in place for determining road classifications before making local changes. If there is a reason that CT-75, Marshall Phelps Rd, etc. should be changed, you should provide documentation on the wiki page
jnighan (2022-07-05 14:00:28+00:00): Link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification
user_12470424 (2022-07-05 15:44:54+00:00): Hi there! Didn’t know there was such a page, I’ll make documentation as such from here on out. Changes were made based on the road’s actual type. Such as Route 75 serving as a primary road for Bradley Airport and Marshall Phelps Road serving as a town road connector rather than being a main road (speed limit is only 30 MPH). But I can see now why these roads are classified as such. If there are missing ones (such as SSRs, there are a lot), I’ll fix those if needed.
jnighan (2022-07-05 22:47:32+00:00): Hi! Thanks for the info. Functional highway classification is based on the role of the road within the larger network, not the speed limit or physical construction of the road (with the exception of motorways). For example, you can have a two-lane, 30mph road that is a principal artery for long-range and/or local traffic, which would be primary. You could also have a 4-lane, 45mph road in a sparsely populated area that could be secondary or tertiary, if it is not as important in the highway network.

It's important that we have a standard scheme for classifying highways, which is why the current scheme based on state and federal standards has been employed, which I devised with consensus from other CT mappers. I'm going to revert CT-75 and Marshall Phelps Rd to their respective classifications. Feel free to join the local-connecticut Discord channel if you'd like to join the discussion! - Jack
jnighan (2022-07-05 22:52:10+00:00): The segment of CT-75 that you switched to secondary is classified as Other Principal Arterial by the CTDOT, and it belongs to the MAP-21 National Highway System. Any road in CT with either one of those statuses is mapped as highway=primary in CT.

Marshall Phelps Rd is classified as a Minor Arterial highway by the CTDOT, which grants it with highway=secondary tagging in OSM.

Hope this info helps explain the mapping!
jnighan (2022-07-05 22:54:07+00:00): Also, any highway that is a Connecticut State Route gets a minimum of highway=secondary. However, that does not include SSRs (Special Service Roads). SSR status does not have an impact on a road's importance to the broader highway network, as these are usually just access roads to state facilities.
user_12470424 (2022-07-05 23:52:15+00:00): Understood with the bigger roads! Thanks Jack.
I want to ask about tertiary roads, is there a certain level of classification on these? On Long Island, NY, many town roads that had lane boundaries (double yellows etc.) would be classified as highway=tertiary above residential (which didn’t have any lane boundaries). These roads acted as collectors to higher classified roads (which do exist in CT).