piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Marek-M (2022-08-23 11:15:24+00:00): Dziękuję za odpowiedź.

Nie wątpię w istnienie wyspy ani datę jej powstania tylko w to, że istnieje jej nazwa w postaci 'Wyspa Leny K.'.

Na mapach OpenStreetMap nie oznaczamy własności gruntów, tym bardziej skoro rodzina K. jest _współ_właścicielem wyspy, to kolejnym krokiem byłoby wypisanie całej listy innych współwłaścicieli.

Jeżeli nazwa miejscowa to 'Kaleń' na dodatek udokumentowana, to oczywistym jest przypisanie name=Kaleń a nie name=Wyspa Leny K.

Proszę nie tworzyć fikcji na OpenStreetMap, bo zostanie to potraktowane jako wandalizm a Pańskie konto może zostać zablokowane. Pańskie zmiany prawdopodobnie zostaną wkrótce wycofane, przynajmniej te związane z fikcyjnymi nazwami.

Proszę w imieniu społeczności OSM o mapowanie rzeczywistych danych. Fikcję na mapach OSM można tworzyć a innych serwisach, które nie zmieniają danych w OSM - np. https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/pl/ (w innym changesecie już dostał Pan taką propozycję).

Pozdrawiam.

PS: Za chwilę zmienię nazwę wyspy na 'Kaleń' zgodnie z Pańską informacją.
Paweł Kraszewski (2022-08-23 11:43:02+00:00): Witam Ponownie Kaleń to nazwa terenu w tej lokalizacji od Białej Góry do "Pólka" na Grądach. Proszę nie nazywać Wyspy "Kaleń", ponieważ odnosi się do całego obszaru w tej okolicy. Wyspa Leny nie odnosi się do imienia tylko do tego, że w tym miejscu mieszkańcy topili Len w tej odnodze, co jest udokumentowane w lokalnej społeczności. Dlatego nazywają wyspa Leny. Jeżeli chcą Państwo zweryfikować te informacje, proszę o podane email. Wyślę kilka materiałów, zdjęć i map z tej lokalizacji.  Mieszkam w tej okolicy już dłuższy czas i badam ten teren.
balint36 (2022-08-21 23:46:33+00:00): Ez a vonal itt mi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087992703
Tisztán látható, hogy arra nincsen iparvágány, vagy pedig az eredetinek a duplikációja. Mindenesetre ez teljes mértékben hibás.
iz11 (2022-08-22 04:21:22+00:00): Szia!
Véletlen másolás, ilyennel már többször találkoztam tőle.
Törölhető.
zsolt d (2022-08-22 08:01:44+00:00): Szia iz11!
Köszönöm, valóban véletlen másolás, töröltem.
üdv
Zsolt
johantiden (2022-10-11 05:28:50+00:00): Hey! I think you moved some nodes here by mistake. The outline of MOS is weird now.

See this node for instance: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6899225626/history#map=19/59.36911/18.00570
BCNorwich (2022-08-22 06:59:52+00:00): Hi, Please don't join highways to power cables, it constitutes a danger of death.

Duplicated section of highway removed tags amended.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2022-08-22 07:12:40+00:00): Duplicate way removed, tweak tags
eggie (2022-08-21 20:33:52+00:00): Dag Knelusje.. Nog een tip.

Ook opritten kunnen gewoon in OSM
als highway=service
service=driveway
Dan met een extra tag access=private

Dus graag behoudend in het weghalen van wegen.
MVG
eggie
Knelusje (2022-08-23 19:57:46+00:00): Duidelijk, bedankt voor de info.
literan (2022-08-23 19:59:25+00:00): и здесь тоже несуществующие велодорожки
DegPasha (2022-08-23 20:09:00+00:00): При какие вы? На Ломоносовском и Мичуринском есть, я сам ездил. Вы бы хотя бы проверяли...
DegPasha (2022-08-23 20:09:26+00:00): Извиняюсь, про какие вы*
literan (2022-08-23 20:13:46+00:00): вы путаете велодорожки, велополосы и совмещенные пеше/велодорожки. Это все разные сущности, они обозначаются по-разному
literan (2022-08-23 20:14:13+00:00): я исправил на верное (пока на сервер не выгрузил, не трогайте ничего, утром увидите)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-16 13:51:47+00:00): What you wanted to express by adding shop=restaurant to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/232900313/history ?
Famlam (2022-08-21 20:48:24+00:00): Bron had moeten zijn:
Survey + PDOK 2022 quick orthoLR + PDOK 2022 orthoHR + BAG + BGT omtrekgericht
martien-176 (2022-08-22 16:00:33+00:00): Hi, you mapped a building here that is in fact just a patch of sand. I have noticed the same elsewhere, this is not an incident.

Please, zoom in and out in order to clearly see if an object is a building or not. Look for a color difference between the roof and ground, shadows and regular geometric shapes (e.g. rectangles or circles).You can also use different imagery to compare for clarity.

Thanks and regards,

Martien, Global HOT Validator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125199234
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-24 01:23:21+00:00): mapeamento incorreto, o ponto não deveria ser um "parque", segundo, não deveria levar no nome uma frase.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-24 01:25:06+00:00): mapeamento incorreto, não deve colocar um nome generico como nome, senão existe um nome proprio, deixe a propriedade nome em branco.
Famlam (2022-08-21 21:02:20+00:00): Bron: survey...
Ben lekker bezig met bron niet updaten vandaag :)
LockOnGuy (2022-08-23 02:10:06+00:00): Thank you so much! keep up the good work!
eggie (2022-08-21 21:21:17+00:00): Bij de Tango op de Eikenlaan (rotonde) heb ik ooit ook access=customers toegevoegd.  
Zelfde reden..  
Ook hier dan emergency=yes toevoegen denk ik.
C Batenburg (2022-08-21 21:25:03+00:00): Gelijk gedaan. Thanx voor de tip, zal de rest ook eens nalopen.
SHARCRASH (2022-09-08 15:41:55+00:00): Hi! 
For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/610231135 landuse=basin is not an error. There are people who find this tag to be more accurate than natural=water + water=basin because clearly the feature is a land that has been shaped to contain water, i's not really a natural feature: it's rectangular, there is a weir/dam to hold water. All this as the definition states. 

The landuse=basin exists since 2009 and has more than 200k elements whereas the new combo tag exists only since 2020 and 100k elements. Cleary this is already a duplicated tag. 

You've been doing this on several of your changesets and in areas very far appart. Another example here where you've chnaged 4 of them https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125908527 So this can be considered like war tagging! By the way, the fact that you do not describe exactly what you do in your changeset is shady.  So I ask you politely to stop imposing your "tag preferences" and respect tags that have been voted and established for more than a decade otherwise I'll report you.
SHARCRASH (2022-09-08 15:48:20+00:00): By the way about the "natural=" key, 
 I'm in discussion in the Wiki page to denounce the "sudden" change of the definition in 2020. Previously the definition never stated that the natural key can integrate artificial features. Discussion here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:natural#Natural_???
user_5589 (2022-09-08 17:49:55+00:00): Take it up with the maintainers of iD. Their validator marks it as invalid tagging, and it seems reasonable to do so. I have my own fundamental disagreements with maintainers of validators etc over tagging concerning tagging of lanes and the way Osmose handles things so I can understand where such feelings come from.

To quote from the information in this changeset:

resolved:close_nodes:vertices	1
resolved:outdated_tags:deprecated_tags	14
resolved:outdated_tags:incomplete_tags	5
resolved:outdated_tags:noncanonical_brand	495
warnings:mismatched_geometry:point_as_vertex	1

Those are minor errors and I resolved them. Hence fixing minor errors. Hence the changeset comment.
SHARCRASH (2022-09-08 18:17:11+00:00): Thank you very much for the information! I didn't know and understand now. I will contact them.

My feelings are motivated by logic and respecting what has been accepeted by community. The natural key has never included artificial features. Also I'm fed up of duplicated tag schemes for the same feature, it's becoming more common every once in a while.

For the changeset description, OK i see but it is still a very general description like some others do in OSM. So it's not really relevant and helping other contributors understand what changes you did, therefore not really transparent. I think you can easily make an effort for the descriptions.

Thanks again on the enlightenment for iD! Have a great continuation!
skyper (2023-01-25 17:48:20+00:00): Hi ottwiz,
I doubt that you used the correct tag for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088009650, see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22677.
Did you use the internal preset?
Are there really two towers next to each other? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553112092)

Take care,
skyper
ottwiz (2023-01-25 19:26:02+00:00): Hi skyper,

No, there is only one tower at the location, and I was using the JOSM internal preset (Big communications tower), just I wanted to trace its shape. I can just either delete my change there or retag it and use the utils2 plugin for replacing geometry.
skyper (2023-01-25 22:53:49+00:00): Hi ottwiz,
thanks for your answer. Replacing the node with a way (shape) is no problem but "replace geometry" will not work with an existing object as target. So keeping the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8553112092 will be tricky but I see you have already managed the task.

`communications_tower` are quite rare compared to `tower` with `tower:type=communication` and we are looking for a solution to prevent the massively incorrect use of the first one. Do you have any hints?
ottwiz (2023-01-25 23:13:36+00:00): So, for communication tower I understand "cellphone tower" as I interpret, because the communication tower is a broad term. It can be a radio mast, TV mast etc. Okay, as far as I know there is "Mast" and "Antenna" but most radio antennas are masts.

So what I can suggest is to rename the preset which should contain "Big communications tower (>100m tall)" or put presets where the options are already set, like "Cell tower" for it, for example, so we can save time on thinking what should we choose, you get it. This can be the case with TV / Radio antennas too since when I'm mapping landcover I sometimes discover unmapped cell towers and radio stations, so a good tagging preset is always handy :)
skyper (2023-01-26 21:36:54+00:00): I see, so you suggest to have different presets for the types of tower and mast, like the external preset "Mast and Tower (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Presets/MastAndTower)? There I changed the name for communications_tower to "Huge telecommunications tower". Does that help?
ottwiz (2023-01-26 23:50:12+00:00): Makes sense in this case. Thanks for the help. Even huge radio masts seem to have the proper tag (mast or tower)
Falsernet (2023-07-20 02:01:22+00:00): You seem to have added building=* to areas that should be tagged with building:part=*, with an enclosing building=* area. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
user_11932834 (2022-08-22 10:28:48+00:00): Maybe try to be funny for once...
user_15552334 (2022-08-22 21:16:20+00:00): Maybe try not to be furry for once
highflyer74 (2022-08-23 13:26:06+00:00): To be honest, this is not really funny. Now we have a self-intersecting residential landuse which reaches out into the sea. @PixelDubs: are you able and willing to improve this?
geow (2022-08-22 21:49:44+00:00): Du hast hier ein Gebäude als landwirtschaftliche Betriebsfläche/Hoffläche erfasst, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard

Das passt nicht ganz - der landuse-key wird nur für Flächennutzungen verwendet. Das Gebäude könntest du vielleicht genauer mit building=barn (Stadl) oder building=cowshed (Kuhstall) oder  building=cabin (Hütte) beschreiben.
user_1566574 (2023-04-01 20:00:32+00:00): Salut !
Pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/969635298 et les autres bâtiments à l'intérieur, pour éviter que JOSM te sorte l'erreur "Bâtiments à l'intérieur d'un autre", il suffit de remplacer ceux à l'intérieur de building=yes à building:part=yes. Voir le Wiki, et ne pas hésiter à demander de l'aide. ;)
TitiABCD (2023-04-01 20:06:09+00:00): Merci pour la technique... ;)
user_1566574 (2023-04-01 18:50:23+00:00): Salut ! Je ne suis pas convaincu par cette modif, ça ne s'apparente pas à une rue résidentielle mais à un chemin forestier/rural (quand bien même il serait bitumé).
J'aimerais connaître ton avis stp, merci ! :)
TitiABCD (2023-04-01 20:02:48+00:00): J'ai toujours du mal à mettre en chemin si c'est bitumé. C'est peut-être une erreur.
Surtout que dans mes souvenirs (qui commencent à dater un peu), elle assez large...
user_1566574 (2023-04-01 20:16:24+00:00): Sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype, on met tracktype=* en combinaison de highway=track, et dans certains cas (comme celui-ci à mon avis) ça peut aller.
L'usage compte aussi, pas que l'apparence, et celui-ci n'apparaît pas destiné a un trafic résidentiel et régulier.
Bon, je vais utiliser l'argument de la majorité, on est 4 contributeurs a avoir touché le chemin, dont 3 d'accords avec highway=track, je vais sur cette piste.

Merci de ta réponse rapide et cordiale, bonne soirée ! :)
bumpyroad (2022-08-23 19:10:20+00:00): Please try to limit the bounding area of your edits in each change set. This edit spans most of the world!
Kuwaity26 (2024-09-05 15:11:46+00:00): Acknowledged!
azakh-world (2022-08-22 10:53:15+00:00): Добрый день.
Вы опять делаете много ошибок с метро. Вот некоторые:
1. Линия w49922414 не является railway=station. Такой объект уже нарисован - это n242546355, вы создали дубль, да ещё на неподходящем объекте. См. вики-статью https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation Появились и другие дубли станций.
2. На внешний контур некоторых платформ навесили теги платформы, породив дубль объекта, и использовали этот контур в отношениях. Пример - w1088017800 (внешний контур) в мультиполигоне r7198098. На самом деле платформа одна, и если это мультиполигон, то в отношения надо добавлять его.
3. Вы проставляете тег name постройкам, относящимся к станциям, например w96961036. Такие здания обычно не имеют своего имени, не следует переносить на них имя станции.
4. То же касается платформ, например w52301963. На будущее - не надо переносить имя станции на все связанные объекты: платформы, входы в метро, турникеты и т.д. Если беспокоитесь, что платформы останутся безымянными, то напрасно - пользователи данных OSM (например, в генераторах карт) смогут, если надо, взять имя станции для платформ.
5. Вы удалили существующую платформу, чтобы создать такую же, даже не уточнив геометрию. Заменяя мультиполигон на замкнутую линию с наложениями на другие линии (например, r5607044 на w1088017801), не привнося при этом никаких улучшений, вы лишь подогреваете священную войну между приверженцами разных точек зрения.
6. Спорным моментом является, считать ли постройки типа w1088017804 train_station или нет. Если там есть хотя бы билетные кассы, то это может быть оправдано. Однако, опять же, не надо давать им имя, копируя имя станции. Прочитайте статью Tag:building=train_station, где написано "The railway=station element also carries the name tag for the station as a whole. Individual buildings [...] might also have a name tag __if__ the buildings have special name __different__ from the station name."
7. Вы удалили одну из станций Кунцевская - n5176248501. Считать ли пересадочную станцию одной или двумя станциями - вопрос открытый. Лучший вариант для вас - оставить всё как есть, чтобы не ломать приложения, работающие на существующих данных. Однако вы также зачем-то удалили отношения, формирующую пересадку. Я заметил, что в других ЧС вы удалили и другие пересадки.
8. Вы испортили выход из метро n1300925776, удалив самый важный тег. См. вики-статью Tag:railway=subway_entrance : "This tag is also used to map subway exits".

Как итог, большинство ваших исправлений либо вредны, либо бесполезны. Если вы не исправите эти и другие ошибки в этом и других своих пакетах правок, их придётся откатить.
literan (2022-08-25 19:30:48+00:00): похоже, надо все откатывать. На сообщения в личку он тоже не реагирует
nevw (2022-08-21 23:05:50+00:00): Hi
please don’t add the name= tag to the houses. Other tags give that info already.
Colin Smale (2022-08-22 08:25:05+00:00): Why are you moving the admin boundary between Llannor and Pwllheli? Do you know something the Ordnance Survey don't?
James Beeching (2022-08-22 02:14:42+00:00): I do not believe this place exists. Please remove if this is the case.
jeslop (2022-08-22 12:50:16+00:00): Reverted on changeset #125225976

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
kepivar (2022-08-23 20:34:51+00:00): May you please add a tag (parcel=yes) to those GIS parcels?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-29 06:00:59+00:00): 1) it is a bad idea

2) it is unusual idea, see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/parcel=yes

3) you made 0 edits: please do not engage in tag inventing ideas in changeset comments
James Beeching (2022-08-22 02:13:45+00:00): I do not believe this place exists. Please remove if this is the case.
Udarian (2022-08-22 03:04:33+00:00): I also find it incredibly hard to believe that anything other than swamp exists in this part of the everglades, especially with the name of the town being "Falsehood" and that other similar edits have been made in other parts of the nation that have similar names such as additions made in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125202530 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125201998 and many others made by this individual seam to be made up additions.
Falsernet (2022-08-21 23:49:31+00:00): + expanded pavement network
skquinn (2022-08-22 00:23:58+00:00): This also included some buildings
German C (2022-09-30 21:22:05+00:00): Verificar, se tocó la super relación que aparece aqui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Listado_divisi%C3%B3n_pol%C3%ADtica
skquinn (2022-08-22 00:52:33+00:00): Should also have "MapWithAI; microsoft/BuildingFootprints" in sources. JOSM bug
Oregon On Demand (2024-07-07 21:07:45+00:00): Hi there, it's been a while but I was curious why you removed the Wikidata tag on this park.
Oregon On Demand (2024-07-07 21:15:07+00:00): Nvm, sorry, I see it was changed to a multipolygon and tags moved there. Thanks
felipeeugenio (2022-08-23 23:27:59+00:00): ALonso. por favor mirar lo que te escibí por Telegram. Estos service están la mayoria mal hechos cambiados
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125203829
RolandHUN_Mapper (2022-08-22 01:07:36+00:00): A terület nem szabványosan megjelenített útfelületet ábrázol area=yes és highway=service címkével. Ez ahhoz szükséges, hogy a buszforduló területe megjelenjen a térképen. Ajánlatos figyelmen kívül hagyni az automatikus javítási eszközöket.
LockOnGuy (2022-08-23 01:58:35+00:00): Why did you delete the 'name' tag from:     https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5033174821/history    
And:     
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5136125421/history    ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-25 14:33:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9968999509/history has shop = materiales_de_construccion that was added in this edit
shop=materiales_de_construccion ? shop=building_materials ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=building_materials ) or shop=trade + trade=building_supplies ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:trade%3Dbuilding_supplies ) was likely meant
user_5359 (2022-08-23 10:40:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/633483326. What is the meaning of the tag _status = retired?
This seems the same information like
disused:power = plant
end_date = 2021-01
note = Plant retired in 2021 -
Olyon (2022-08-24 00:07:54+00:00): Hello.
Sorry, _status=retired shouldn't be there.
The status comes from the data source, I put a "_" in front to think about deleting it before sending the data but it seems that it didn't work all the time...
I deleted it and I will try not to repeat the same error.
Thanks.
JJIglesias (2022-08-22 04:54:49+00:00): Saludos. Infelizmente arrastraste una calle que editaste unas 4 cuadras (Dragged Node) y produjiste los siguiente errores en el mapa:
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway	3
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway	5

Al editar vias es muy importante NO arrastrarlas por error. Te sugerimos que leas:

https://learnosm.org antes de seguir editando.

Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-08-22 04:59:41+00:00): Saludos.

Al crear edificaciones se requiere q las escuadres (Ortogonalices) para eso se marca la figura y se toca la letra Q, o con el click derecho del Mouse tocas la figurita q muestra un cuadrado.

Por favor visita https://learnosm.org
y
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

Gracias
JJ
FreedSky (2022-08-26 08:07:13+00:00): 东湖区调整的公布了吗？
Hon約 (2022-08-28 07:32:11+00:00): 公布了，我问市民政局的
kmpoppe (2022-08-23 12:39:07+00:00): Hi!
Same question as for the two other nodes, the mapillary value seems to be wrong. Please check!
Kai
GOwin (2022-08-24 00:44:22+00:00): Fixed! Thanks for the heads-up.
pesec (2022-08-22 04:44:49+00:00): Добрый день.
Данным пакетом право вы внесли множественные ошибки в данных: обозначили территорию населенного пункта Костомукша как спорт.площадку, рукомойник как здание и т.д.
Рекомендую внимательно ознакомиться с правилами редактирования в OSM.
literan (2022-08-23 20:38:21+00:00): pesec, вы откатили вандальную правку?
pesec (2022-08-24 03:53:38+00:00):  literan, да.
Пакет правок: 125206520
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-13 12:19:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128189000/history has maxspeed = 40;50 that was added in this edit
Two speed limits cannot apply at the same time, right? Which one applies? Maybe line should be split? Or maxspeed:backward and maxspeed:forward used?

Please reply here if you want to fix this tagging mistake but need help with selecting proper tagging
taketaketake (2025-08-15 22:12:59+00:00): 現地確認できる状況であれば適時編集して頂ければと思います。
私は過去に訪れた個所を公共地図、官報から編集しているだけです
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-18 09:00:56+00:00): Why you set maxspeed = 40;50 here? What this tag is supposed to represent?
taketaketake (2025-08-19 07:06:30+00:00): 先のコメントにも記載しましたが、地図、写真から位置情報を編集しているだけです。
周囲の道の履歴を確認した所、14年前には書き込まれた情報であり、私はmaxspeedを編集していません
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128189003/history/1
taketaketake (2025-08-19 07:21:24+00:00): 付け加えると、誰かによって県道が全て結合されていたため交差点部で分離をしました。
その時にはmaxspeed = 40;50がすでに書き込まれていました。
私が新規でmaxspeedを記入したと勘違いされたようですが違います。
このノードで分離しました。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/653992468#map=19/34.982898/137.559076

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/652992446#map=19/34.965136/137.572773
LockOnGuy (2022-08-22 17:16:42+00:00): Why did you delete the schools?
MikeN (2022-08-22 12:20:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM!   Why was the driveway removed?
Allison P (2022-08-22 20:09:15+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125243471
nevw (2022-08-22 06:32:57+00:00): Hi Ian
what is the nature of these zones? 
They don't appear to be administrative areas or suburb or neighborhoods.
Also you seem to have deleted some wooded areas, a swimming pool area and a childcare centre.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125205823
nevw (2022-08-30 06:54:22+00:00): no response, informal residential zones deleted, etc by reverting changeset.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-22 10:50:51+00:00): Hi,

This pond shouldn't need a layer tag because there's nothing overlapping it. May I ask why you added it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125206052
adeegan (2022-08-22 17:28:25+00:00): Hi, I added a Natual Wood layer that surrounds the pont.  I wanted the pond to be in front of it
emersonveenstra (2022-08-22 17:48:36+00:00): So that's called "mapping for the renderer" and is not good practice (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer). The correct way to do it is to make a multipolygon by shift+clicking the wood and pond, and then right click and Merge (the + icon). That way the pond is correctly excluded from the wood.
adeegan (2022-08-22 18:24:42+00:00): Thanks for the instructions.  I will try to follow and make the correction
nevw (2022-08-22 07:52:59+00:00): Hi
houses are not normally given a name as that info is already included in other tags.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
tonyf1 (2022-08-22 06:42:59+00:00): also https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-38.03129&lng=145.268272&z=17.478564544369295&pKey=850279132364709&focus=photo
gpserror (2022-08-27 01:23:46+00:00): be careful, looks like you dragged node 86186142 accidentally.  I put it back to its original spot in changeset 125427649 .