piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:03:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
Andrea Musuruane (2018-10-01 15:59:42+00:00): Ciao. Perché hai modificato il nome da "Via 25 aprile" a "Via 25 Aprile"? Secondo le convenzioni presenti in Italia (e secondo la lingua italiana), i nomi dei mesi si scrivono con l'iniziale minuscola. Ciao, Andrea
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:03:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:03:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:03:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
lakedistrict (2018-03-29 14:48:50+00:00): Hi Premsakhare, are you sure that these edits are correct? Last time I was there that section of Grey Street was definitely pedestrianised - there were bollards at the end of Hood Street (https://flic.kr/p/RZToTp).  One of us probably needs to do a survey - Hood Street being oneway looks incorrect too.
tux67 (2018-04-10 14:41:26+00:00): Hi lakedisdrict .. this seems to be a bigger issue .. pls. have a look here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57929974

This is also discussed in the German OSM Forum. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964

BR Stephan (tux67)
lakedistrict (2018-04-10 14:56:39+00:00): Thanks, it was also mentioned on the talk-gb mailing list last month https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-March/021259.html
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
marczoutendijk (2018-04-18 18:39:35+00:00): Any specific reason why you moved this tagging to a note? Did you read the discussion on the Dutch forum?
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60633
mueschel (2018-04-19 08:19:02+00:00): Hi,
it's a new tag that wasn't used before. I checked the wiki and wasn't able to find any description of it. I didn't find a discussion in the forums, but I also don't speak Dutch.

I'm perfectly fine with using the tag - you seem to have some discussion about it and if you add a description in the Wiki, everybody can use and understand the tag. 
When I changed it some weeks ago, it looked like one of the random tags people use because they don't know the actual tagging schemes.

Jan
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-07 20:11:30+00:00): Why you think that hiding "random tags" in notes improves anything? Nonsense useless tags should be deleted, mistagged info should be fixed.

Moving them to notes merely hides problem and accomplishes nothing - this kind of edit is as result harmful.
mueschel (2018-05-07 20:18:55+00:00): It's not hiding the information - in contrary, it makes it visible. JOSM shows it now as a special icon, and also iD can list it for the casual user you doesn't look in the list of all tags.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-07 20:28:03+00:00): What you mention may be achieved by adding "fixme=suspicious tags XYZ".

Moving weird tags to note makes nearly impossible to spot issue again.
Harald Hartmann (2018-04-09 13:32:27+00:00): Hallo Wegabschneider. Darf man fragen, wieso du denfolgenden Way gelöscht hast?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97880994/history
Der Weg ist laut Bing noch eindeutig ersichtlich .. ja es gab zwar zwei Versionen vorher jemanden, der der Meinung ist das wäre ein Privatweg (und hat den schonmal gelöscht), aber dafür haben wir ja access, oder nicht?
Harald Hartmann (2018-04-09 13:35:50+00:00): Sorry war zu schnell, hatte die Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57569263 übersehen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:04:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:26:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:03:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:04:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:03:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:04:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
GinaroZ (2018-03-29 12:10:30+00:00): Hi, if you want to see buildings in this area feel free to edit the map and them yourself :)
trigpoint (2018-03-29 16:32:55+00:00): Hi, please could you explain this change? What source did you use, have you visiited the location?
Tagging the road as private is very odd as it provides connectivity for pedestrians to both a public right of way and a footway crossing the nearby junction.
You seem to be making edits all over the planet, which suggests you are not a local and other mappers making similar edits suggest you are being directed in some way. If you are working for, or on behalf of someone, you should state that fact in your user profile.
Cheers Phil
yaswap (2018-04-02 01:46:17+00:00): That was added accidentally. thanks for looking into it.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:22:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:27:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:22:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:23:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:25:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
ChehrehBargi (2019-11-03 11:27:24+00:00): باسلام
در رابطه با مسیرهای زیر پل؛ جایی که پل ثبت شده، نیازی به افزودن تونل نیست ضمن اینکه تونل برای نمایش مسیر پایینتر از سطح زمین ثبت می‌شود.
streckenkundler (2018-07-06 08:24:51+00:00): welchen tieferen Sinn hatte es, das highway=tertiary zu entfernen?
Peter Bremer (2018-08-10 21:11:24+00:00): Hi Magnus, thanks for all the details you have put into the map! I have a few comments for you:

- Footway=sidewalk should only be used in combination with highway=footway. It can not be used together with highway=pedestrian. I tend to use highway=pedestrian only for ways that are considerably broader than normal footpaths, for example at least 3m broad.

- When addind sidewalks, make sure you connect them to all road crossings, otherwise routing software can not let pedestrians cross the road there. For example, the sidewalk on the east side of Sverres gate is not connected to the service road on the other side, between Schønninghuset and Kalvskinnet garasje, so routing software can not let pedestrians cross the road there. I tend to draw sidewalks as separate elements only on roads that are so broad or busy that pedestrians should only cross at pedestrian crossings. For smaller roads, I just add the sidewalk=both tag.

- Adding area=yes to road outlines was a really nice idea to show the complete road surface. However, this tag should only be used on real "driveable areas", not lineair roads. The best indication for this is that the higher level roads (primary, secondary)  do not support the area=yes tag. Instead, use the area:highway=* tag, which sadly has very little support. (OsmAnd supports it though.)
jaap de vries (2018-04-02 21:42:17+00:00): Wat heb je hier gedaan, nu heb je een vage tekst van de droevendaal farm neergezet.
En Ezinge heeft geen WUR gebouwen hier
Road–Runner (2018-04-13 19:29:29+00:00): hallo, ist die bäckerei ein eigener laden, kann/sollte sie in einem eigenen knoten erfasst werden, wenn nicht dann passt das natürlich so.
beste grüße
Hernan (2018-03-29 13:03:13+00:00): Esa plaza ya se encontraba mapeada, no hacia falta volver a hacerlo
viloan (2018-03-29 11:36:54+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Tomas Straupis (2018-03-29 13:55:48+00:00): Žyma power=substation sako, kad pastatas yra pastotė. Teksto/pavadinimo „pastotė“ įvedinėti nereikia.
Rainero (2018-03-30 20:08:59+00:00): Hallo The_Oak,

heißt diese Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24607647 Nittendorfer Weg ?
Die Hausnummer 5 und das FFW-Gebäude deuten darauf hin. Der Name sollte dann noch hinzugefügt werden.

Servus,
Rainer
The_Oak (2018-04-01 15:51:59+00:00): Hallo Rainero,
ich war heute nochmal vor Ort. Sie haben recht, es handelt sich dabei wirklich um den Nittendorfer Weg.
Viele Grüße
The_Oak
Heinz_V (2018-03-29 18:08:49+00:00): You mapped a lot of roads twice!!!
Please correct tis errors.
Derick Rethans (2018-03-29 12:05:23+00:00): Are you sure this postbox is on St. Gabriel's Road?
Derick Rethans (2018-03-29 12:05:59+00:00): Sorry, *not* on St. Gabriel's Road
BCNorwich (2018-03-29 13:50:28+00:00): Hi, it now looks like you've moved it into the back garden of a house. Must be special delivery and pick only.
ubasche (2018-04-02 08:50:49+00:00): I haven't changed any post boxes, at least not intentionally. It's not far, so I'll go there and have a look where the post box is.
BCNorwich (2018-04-02 09:51:01+00:00): Hi Thanks, you must have accidentally moved it from roughly the middle of St Gabriel's Road to the back garden.
Regards.
ubasche (2018-04-03 15:36:51+00:00): There was no post box, so I removed it.
johsin18 (2018-03-29 13:10:25+00:00): You added both "market asiatico Basel" and turned it into a butcher.  So is it a butcher or an Asian supermarket?
And "market asiatico Basel" is not a proper name, so it should go to the "description" tag at most.
abakus_uploader (2018-03-29 22:30:38+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_6110846 (2018-04-17 17:42:29+00:00): Добрый вечер 
Зачем удален созданный в 2014 г landuse=brownfield 
этого обьекта конечно не видно при посещении спустя столько лет потому что так мапиьться территория где когда то чтото было а сейчас ничего но в будущем терриоория пригодна для постройки Прочтите вики правило о б этом теге
ivanbranco (2024-05-10 14:59:38+00:00): Ciao LuSirto, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3900395254/history

cos'è questo albero? natural=tree cozza un po' con material=metal, inoltre l'altezza supera quella dell'albero più alto d'Italia, che è sui 62 metri, per questo mi è venuto il dubbio.
ianlopez1115 (2018-03-31 04:58:26+00:00): [I-A, San Pablo] add operator to fast food place
StephaneP (2018-08-05 06:00:12+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir modifié le nom de l'aérodrome ?
"Aérodrome René Dambon" est correct, il a été baptisé ainsi au décès de son créateur, il y a quelques années.
Heinz_V (2018-03-29 18:06:24+00:00): Please map roads in residential areas as residential roads!!
eggie (2018-03-29 13:24:20+00:00): Dag Issa... Je plakt vlakken aan wegen vast volgens mij. Ook is Leisure=park geen vervanging voor landuse. Het is de bedoeling dat de landuse wordt ingevuld. De Leisure=park kan dan wel helemaal los over eeles heen gelegd worden. Een echt park heeft ook meestal een naam.
Dit was je edit: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57632046
eggie (2018-03-29 13:33:37+00:00): De Leisure=park heb ik net losgemaakt van de wegen en als voorbeeld even wat landuse ingevuld.. natural=wood wordt ook niet meer gebruikt. landuse=forest voor stukken bos. 

Taggen dus wat je ziet.. en voor de functie een losse cover Leisure=park om het hele parjgebeid heen.. met naam.
Graag reactie
eggie (2018-03-29 13:52:49+00:00): Meer naar het zuiden heb ik ook de landuse=grass losgemaakt van de wegen. Dat gaat anders echt problemen geven bij verschuiven.
Lokai (2018-03-29 14:13:32+00:00): Hallo wernerzwo,

man gewinnt den Eindruck, dass du dich mit dem wiki befasst hast. Leider entspricht die Wegeführung nicht ganz dem Luftbild. Falls du darstellen möchtest, dass dort niemand das Grundstück betreten darf (Teile des Hofes), dann ist das völlig in Ordnung, doch stelle die Wegführung so dar wie sie ist. Nach dem turning_circle führt der Weg weiter. Eine Beteiligung an der Diskussion ist hilfreich
wernerzwo (2018-03-29 15:39:18+00:00): Tja, man tut was man kann... ;-)
Luftbild ist das eine, aber ein Zaun vor dem Betriebsgelände das andere! Daher endet der Weg da, wo es nicht mehr weiter geht...
Lokai (2018-03-30 07:23:27+00:00): Ok, verstanden. Ich habe den Wendekreis geändert, access=no war nicht sinnvoll. Ein betreten wäre verboten gewesen. 
Wünsche happy mapping!
atcomapper (2018-03-30 08:27:06+00:00): Hej Michael.
Jeg ved ikke helt, hvad du forsøger at opnå, men det er IKKE sådan her, vi indtegner bygninger i OSM. Husl på at de indtegninger du laver er synlige for alle brugere, inklusive de tusindvis af hjemmesider og apps, der benytter OSM data. Det er derfor ekstremt vigtigt, at du følger korrekt datasyntaks og almindelig god skik.
Jeg forsøgte at hjælpe dig for et par dage siden ved at tegne skolebygningen korrekt ind, men jeg kan se du har slettet det hele igen og endnu engang tegnet bygninger forkert ind. Igen har du brugt "name" tagget til at beskrive de forskellige bygninger, hvilket er helt forkert.
Jeg vil på det kraftigste anbefale dig at bruge noget tid på at sætte dig ind i, hvad OSM egentlig er, og hvordan du kan bidrage med data. Der findes en udmærket begynderguide her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide
Vær opmærksom på, at hvis du fortsat indtegner data af dårlig kvalitet, vil den til stadighed blive slettet af andre brugere.
Hjart (2018-03-29 12:49:45+00:00): Bemærk at navnefeltet ikke bør bruges til at beskrive objekter ("Legeplads" er her en beskrivelse)
GOwin (2018-03-30 02:40:35+00:00): Great addition to the map. Thanks.
letihu (2018-03-31 11:15:19+00:00): Verdoppelt "OsmHydrant" die Einträge?
Z.B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5514117100/history#map=19/53.57909/10.09631
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5514116458/history
oder
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5514114142/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5514130437/history
So etwas habe ich schon oft gesehen.
Axelos (2018-04-01 09:48:27+00:00): Coucou DRC., sympa de constater que vous contribuez :)
Quelques petits conseils pour vous aider, comme vous venez de débuter c'est normal qu'il y a des erreurs.

Si vous modifiez la référence de la véloroute, il faut aussi lui indiquer le réseau correspondant.
Actuellement c'est network=ncn, hors cette balise correspond au niveau national. Si vous passez la relation en EuroVelo, il faut remplacer par network=icn (réseau international).
Facultatif, vous pouvez retirer icn_ref=17 qui n'a pas d'usage sur les relations, c'est pour la représentation des itinéraires directement sur les chemins (pratique déconseillé).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Itin%C3%A9raires_cyclables#Relations
Vélo & Territoires (2018-04-04 07:28:59+00:00): Bonjour Axelos, c'est vrai que nous débutons dans cet exercice fastidieux de mise à jour des itinéraires!
Vous avez raison, l'itinéraire concerné est bien un itinéraire de niveau national car c'est la ViaRhôna, le tag network est bien ncn, mais la référence de la ViaRhôna en France est EV17. La ViaRhôna est une partie de la EV17 (relation parent) qui est en network = icn et qui s"appelle  [http://www.eurovelo.com/en/eurovelos/eurovelo-17\ Rhone Cycle Route]
Axelos (2018-04-04 18:13:32+00:00): En effet, après quelques petites recherches vous semblez avoir raison … Désolé pour le dérangement inutile !
Heinz_V (2018-03-29 18:00:45+00:00): Your changing of NH58 are not OK.
I revert it.
viloan (2018-03-29 12:54:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
sergeybe (2018-03-29 13:49:45+00:00): Вы точно уверены, что здесь есть указатель или плакат с информацией для туристов?
lakedistrict (2018-03-29 14:05:06+00:00): Hi Egretta, Thanks for your edits. Just to let you know the housename field is for the building name which isn't always the same as the hostel name. Also, the operator field only needs the name of the operator, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator. I've adjusted your edits to YHA Ambleside so surveyed data isn't lost. Any questions just ask. :-)
mweper (2018-03-29 17:33:40+00:00): Hola Arleone. ¿Puedes confirmar si esta es la ubicación correcta del centro de salud? Si te fijas bien, más al sur en calle Plutarco, ya existe otro punto con el mismo nombre y categoría.
-
Uno de los 2 puntos se debe borrar, a menos que exista en ambas ubicaciones.