piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tonyf1 (2022-05-07 07:01:37+00:00): This is possibly the busiest cycleway in Melbourne. You are required to walk your bike over the MacRobertson Bridge see the mark on the path https://www.mapillary.com/app/user/tonyf1?lat=-37.829741666667&lng=145.01292222222&z=17&pKey=320855036181735&focus=photo&x=0.46570260562484334&y=0.5773553235026632&zoom=0.8864569083447333 removing the tagging permitting bicycles makes no sense at all.
tonyf1 (2022-05-15 00:32:09+00:00): see Changeset #120996238
HighRouleur (2022-05-15 03:18:40+00:00): The Mapillary link you provided included a big picture of a bike with a cross through it painted on the ground indicating that bikes are not permitted. Not sure how you have have come to the conclusion that bikes are permitted. 

 The bridge way that diverts north and follows Yarra Boulevard is not part of the Main Yarra Trail. 

Please revert the change.
tonyf1 (2022-05-15 03:59:18+00:00): see talk-au
Ewen Hill (2022-05-15 21:52:32+00:00): The changeset of paths leading to Macrobertson Bridge allows you to cycle to the Macrob bridge. This should be reinstated as there are no signs preventing you cycling this section off the CCT. The Bridge should be cycle=dismount on the bridge. I am a local and regular user of the CCT and cross the river on a regular basis.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120382941
turepalsson (2022-05-11 09:02:36+00:00): Relationerna 11155683 och 11155684 har råkat bli medlemmar i sig själva.
Enock4seth (2023-05-04 22:17:45+00:00): unfortunately that was very horrible tagging for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170709256 

I have reverted your tags, this road cannot be oneway. please understand what a tag mean before adding them
yasunari (2022-05-01 16:31:36+00:00): name には解説ではなく固有名を書きます。
解説は description タグに。
user_5359 (2022-05-01 09:39:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. 

Please use also sometimes the lowercase characters :).
eggie (2022-04-30 12:59:00+00:00): Beste finetuned..
Gebruik svp de reeds bestaande adresnode om op bij te taggen. Je hoeft zelf geen adressen aan te maken.
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-04-30 13:01:05+00:00): Maar het is inderdaad lastig al meer bedrijven hetzelfde adres gebruiken.
Er is geen goede oplossing voor.
Groet
Eggie
finetuned (2022-05-03 09:28:02+00:00): Dit lijkt me dan toch de beste oplossing. Het is een groot gebouw, en iemand die dit bedrijf zoekt is geholpen bij de wetenschap dat het aan deze zijde van het gebouw is.

Ik had eerder de bestaande adresnode getagd, maar dat leek me ook niet gepast.
eggie (2022-05-03 09:34:15+00:00): Hoi.. Denk ook dat het zo oke is.

MVG
eggie
zluuzki (2022-04-30 17:48:05+00:00): Looks good, better than no building. Tip: Use the "Q" key to automatically square buildings.
Enock4seth (2022-09-11 18:34:19+00:00): Please, what are you trying to map here?
eggie (2022-04-30 14:21:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
habitual_revers (2022-04-30 21:22:00+00:00): Bedankt Eggie!
MxxCon (2022-05-01 02:57:56+00:00): Hello.
How exactly did you "fix" coastlines, and which coastlines?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120384176
vng_me (2022-05-01 03:18:05+00:00): You can check my changeset.

Removed wrong coastline tag from 2 ways on the land. Returned back coastline tag to 1 way to fix the gap.

3 ways only but the changeset's bbox is very large, so seems like it confused you.
eggie (2022-04-30 14:19:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2022-05-01 03:00:01+00:00): Hello.
What exactly are you trying to map here? Many of the tags you added are invalid.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120384967
habitual_revers (2022-04-30 13:26:02+00:00): Typo: mopeds are NOT allowed
ZLima12 (2022-05-02 05:16:24+00:00): Hi,

"Not reported" isn't the best changeset comment. If you're developing for this app, could you take a look at this? Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120385108
Andrea Musuruane (2022-05-01 07:11:25+00:00): Ciao. Il parcheggio non deve avere nodi in comune con la strada. Ciao, Andrea
phidauex (2023-03-17 20:35:29+00:00): Hi, I noticed you moved this section up to trunk and added expressway tagging. From my understanding of our current guidance, the expressway tagging makes sense, but the trunk classification seems too high since this short stretch doesn't connect population centers. Thoughts?
Trevor_1 (2023-03-18 16:21:30+00:00): I changed it to Trunk because it connects 2 motorways in a short distance
Trevor_1 (2023-03-18 16:22:43+00:00): But once the construction of the motorway to the north is complete, it could probably go back to primary
phidauex (2023-03-19 02:14:13+00:00): Ok, that sounds reasonable. It is a bit of an odd area right now with the main road still under construction. I'll take another look once they finish the N. Powers extension to I-25.
4004 (2022-05-01 00:39:18+00:00): reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120403230
DanielBautista (2022-05-01 01:40:55+00:00): Hello, 
I previously deleted these boundary relations (Santa Coloma and Andorra la Vella) as they do not seem to correspond to any actual official administrative boundary. 
Is there a reason for keeping them that I am not aware of? 
Thank you!
user_177389 (2022-05-01 06:25:11+00:00): Hello,  

Andorra la Vella was just broken, not deleted. So I thought it was just forgotten after the landuse adjustment. Based on your hint (thanks for that) and looking at the surrounding places, I now also think that the relations can be deleted. I will do that.  

Best regards,  
Mario
4004 (2022-05-01 00:41:36+00:00): здравствуйте, Дмитрий, может, все же выйдете на контакт?
danieldegroot2 (2022-12-01 17:50:52+00:00): Hey Tilia_J,

Deze camping is nu verdeeld in twee vlakken zonder verschil in tags. Een is
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056231171
Ik denk dat dit vlak verwijderd of samengevoegd kan worden. Anders stel ik voor om bv. een "note" tag toe te voegen om het verschil of de nodige informatie aan te geven.

Je wijzigingen, ter informatie
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120387763

Groet,

Daniel
Tilia_J (2022-12-01 18:01:00+00:00): Is verwijderd. Dank voor de oplettendheid
user_5359 (2022-05-01 07:02:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your entry is duplicate to https://www.osm.org/way/153339078
praise_you (2022-05-01 17:54:47+00:00): Hallo, hast du die landuses vor Ort angesehen? Die Fläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053886589 ist eigentlich ein Feld, aber der aktuelle Pächter hat Feldfutter angebaut. Ich würde es als farmland taggen. Ebenso das Feld östlich davon.
PPete2 (2022-05-01 18:06:09+00:00): Hi, nein nur anhand der aktuellen Luftbilder. Falls du detailliertere Infos hast, bitte gerne korrigieren.
eggie (2022-04-30 16:13:54+00:00): Beste HR  Houd je er rekening mee dat je met editor iD geen fietsroutes kunt splitsen. De routeralievolgode gaat dan verloren.
Wanneer je wegen wilt bewerken met fietsroutes gebruik dan svp editor JOSM
Dan kan het wel.
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 MVG
eggie
MVG
eggie
habitual_revers (2022-04-30 16:29:03+00:00): Beste Eggie! Bedankt voor jouw feedback. Ik lees nu over JOSM. 

Is het mogelijk om de fiets route to verbinden met the weg met iD editor (zonder splitsen)? want het is verplicht voor de bromfietser te bewegen over het rijweg op de endpunt van zuiderzeeweg. 
Of raad je dat ik do het met JOSM?
eggie (2022-04-30 16:34:35+00:00): Met JOSM!!!!

En dan op één plaats tegelijk.
Ben nu bezig met hersteld van die LF zuiderzeeroute. Even geen idee of het door jouw edits komt.
Zijn ook zaken die je niet kunt weten.
Die routes repareren is ook niet mijn ding.  Als ik er niet uit kom vraag ik wel één van de specialisten.
Met editor iD komt het routerelatiedeel helemaal achteraan te staan Soms gaat het goed, maar meestal niet met iD.
Kijk eens naar JOSM. Dan kun je ook
presets voor die bromfietspaden laden in josm  en hoef je niet alles in te vullen.
 Succes,
eggie
habitual_revers (2022-04-30 16:38:48+00:00): Oh Sorry. Thanks for fixing my mistake. I'll be more careful
eggie (2022-04-30 18:18:05+00:00): Two routes are fixed now by Dvdhoven.

Greetz,
eggie
FasterTracker (2022-05-17 14:44:20+00:00): Hi! I've read the fixme of the bus route.

At the departure terminal did the location at the information panel say "16 Porto"?
Cerritus (2022-05-23 17:21:19+00:00): Hi, It was the 16 as far as I know. At least the part from Lisboa to Nazaré definitely follows this route. However, I'm not sure if that line ends at Porto or continues further on. For the route from Nazaré to Porto, I also have GPS data available, but didn't manage to add it to the map yet.
FasterTracker (2022-05-25 16:49:59+00:00): That's nice to know!

What I was asking is if the information panel at the bus station of Sete Rios said "Porto" or not. That's because the panel lists out the bus number and the final stop of a particular route and therefore we could know if Porto was the terminal.

Happy mapping, FT
Cerritus (2022-05-31 17:50:24+00:00): Hi, That's an information that I can't remember. However, a few days ago I took a bus of the line 16 again (this time from Oriente, but still number 16). It was written Porto, so I'd assume that also in the previous case it was going with the destination Porto.
Frans S (2022-05-01 08:36:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random. 
We welcome you as a new mapper. There are a number of issues which needs to be adressed.  
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
First. Restrict your mappings to buildings only.
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.

When there is no shadow next to the object, it is probably not a building



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120388737
bxl-forever (2022-04-30 15:46:26+00:00): Hello,

"(no comment)" is a way to tell other mappers "This is none of your business". :-(

When you remove 15 bus relations, most of which being referred in apps and in the wiki, perhaps it would be nice explaining what is going on.

In one of your previous changeset I suggested you keep existing route relations instead of routinely deleting them and creating your own, because preserving history of objects is one of OSM good practices.

Have a nice day.
ALu68 (2022-05-03 18:14:18+00:00): Hello Esther Mnyasa,

here you created buildings over excisting buildings

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056247165#map=19/-6.79629/37.62678
PT-53 (2022-05-23 07:33:31+00:00): Hallo 7YGT,
Du hast diese no_right_turn-TR 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14093049/history
neu angelegt, welche fehlerhaft ist.

Bei einer no.... TR (no_right-turn, no_left_turn, no_straight_on und no_u_turn) müssen die from-, via- und to-Mitglieder die Strecke aufzeigen, die man nicht fahren darf. Dazu müßte bei dieser TR dieser Straßenabschnitt 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24873602
am via-Knoten
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/270290323#map=19/48.44899/9.14227
noch aufgetrennt werden und der neue südliche Straßenabschnitt als to-Mitglied in die TR eingesetzt werden.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-06-20 11:47:37+00:00): Hallo 7YGT, 
nachdem Du bisher leider nicht reagiert hast, habe ich heute die fehlerhfate TR entsprechend angepaßt.
Grüße

PS:
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
pyram (2022-12-29 13:28:41+00:00): Hi theophrastos,
"Kernschlag" ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9705457808#map=16/49.4160/10.8832 ) ist hier doppelt erfasst ( https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=14.27/49.42/10.89&layer=place_nodes_close )
Kannst Du den wieder löschen - oder ist der Ältere ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1430559188/history#map=16/49.4158/10.8810 ) falsch platziert?

Gruß
pyram
theophrastos (2022-12-30 05:15:16+00:00): Hallo pyram,

Der Ältere sieht korrekter aus. Ich bin dort offensichtlich am Rand der Fläche entlang gewandert. Werde ich die Tage korrigieren, danke.

MfG 
theophrastos
paganella31 (2023-03-01 20:47:50+00:00): source: survey, gpx
bxl-forever (2022-08-05 15:49:55+00:00): Duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9580248851

Your edit has been reverted.
bxl-forever (2022-04-30 15:51:25+00:00): Hello,

I would like to inform you of problems with your latest changesets.

In Brussels we did considerable work surveying the accurate location of every bus stop run by STIB/MIVB, and about half of those for TEC and De Lijn.

I see you are routinely moving stops, typically putting them as a node of the platform.

If you have specific requirements—is this a routing issue where people need to logically bind those two objects?—maybe we should talk about this first.  For instance, we have created stop_area relations, which are there to solve this problem in OSM.

Otherwise, moving stops away from their real location to put them to arbitrary locations is considered vandalism.
MxxCon (2022-05-01 03:16:30+00:00): Hello.
When a business occupies only part of a building, it is inappropriate to tag the whole building as that business. It should be tagged as a separate node inside the perimeter of that building.
Furthermore, it is inappropriate to map the same feature twice. In this case you tagged the whole building and a separate. You can read more about this here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120390999
Geim (2022-05-30 17:37:24+00:00): Waarom heb je de landuse hier gewist? https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120391192
Zie ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3202898
SekeRob (2022-05-02 09:04:14+00:00): Hi,

square does not need an area tag. Before was not flagged in any QA prog of OSM.

The tagging of both pedestrian area and square on the same object is technically conflicting though.
pippo6 (2022-07-12 08:12:10+00:00): Hello, thanks for fixing it
mariotomo (2022-05-21 16:47:51+00:00): hola y bienvenido a OSM. ten en cuenta que OSM es un esfuerzo colectivo y colaborativo. como principiante, es normal que hagas errores y que otros quieran apoyarte en mejorar tus prácticas. para eso es fundamental que declares tus intenciones, en la descripción del conjunto de cambios. de esta forma quien revise puede sugerirte como mejor alcanzar tu objetivo.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
InsertUser (2022-04-30 20:09:57+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Are these edits from local knowledge, survey or another source? The only thing mentioned in the changeset is Bing imagery. 

Some of these additions also seem to have quite descriptive names, is this actually how they're named on the signs? https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
SarahDaGreat242 (2022-04-30 23:11:41+00:00): These edits are from local knowledge and yes that is actually how they are named on the signs.
snoozingnewt (2022-05-29 13:18:47+00:00): They're actually named "abandon building", "my house", and "bahamas national trust/restaurant"? Those all seem like highly suspect names for buildings.
gscholz (2022-05-01 05:47:18+00:00): Hi lennin[lwe*¨}¨+,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-73.04230&lat=5.81903&zoom=15

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120391853

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Matteo Calosi (2025-11-24 10:38:29+00:00): Ciao, due cime che hai aggiunto con questo changeset, Piramide e Cavallone di Germano, hanno quote palesemente sbagliate per la posizione, potresti correggere quote o posizione?
Gianfranco De Rose (2025-11-25 12:14:06+00:00): Cia Matteo,  ti vedo sempre attivo, appena ho un po di tempo ricontrollo tutto e rimetto a posto. Nel caso fossi già a conoscenza delle dati altimetrici e di posizione corrette se li correggi direttamente tu mi fai una cortesia.
Matteo Calosi (2025-11-25 13:39:48+00:00): Sulle carte topografiche comuni non ci sono proprio queste cime, non so se ti basi su conoscenze dei posti o carte più specialistiche per aggiungerle, quindi personalmente non saprei dove metterle. Ho solo notato che in questo caso ci sono centinaia di metri di discrepanza con le curve di livello
Gianfranco De Rose (2025-11-25 18:56:42+00:00): Credo di averli presi coma anche i tponimi da Vaj dai due volumi d Vajo Che Passione. ch riporta queste cartografie: C.TG.TRENTINO, C.T.R. VENETO E CARTA DEL COMITATO
GRUPPI ALPINISTICI VERONESI, ELABORAZIONE T. BELLOC.TG.TRENTINO, C.T.R. VENETO E CARTA DEL COMITATO
GRUPPI ALPINISTICI VERONESI, ELABORAZIONE T. BELLO
Appena avro un po di tempo ci guardo e provo anche a chidere all'autore
Gianfranco De Rose (2025-11-26 08:57:39+00:00): Ha ragione  ho controllato le curve DEM  e rispetto  alla mappa sopra indicata ci sono quai 200 m di dislivelo,,
La quota DEM stimata è 1564,  il picco montuoso che in realta e una cresta c e  se apri con google map questa coordinate e quello indicato 45.740023, 11.123881
per ora in attesa di maggiori niformazioni  mi limito  a correggere la quota, dal punta di vista escursionistico è importante percge separa il Vajo dei Massi Sospesi dal Vajo delle bisse Bianche. Speriamo che faccia un bel po di neve cosi avado a controllare personalmente
eggie (2022-04-30 20:06:50+00:00): Dag Carla.. Staat er een G7 bord ?  Zoniet dan highway=path gebruiken..
Dan wel foot =yes en bicycle=?? 

Op een footway hoeft geen foot=yes. (default)

Groet
eggie
mariotomo (2022-05-21 16:49:23+00:00): p.s.: "correciones" es un buen ejemplo de descpripción que no dice nada.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
ملاك ساقط (2022-05-01 10:30:44+00:00): Greetings,
why have you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462354822/history "Downtown Lithia Springs" ?
zluuzki (2022-05-01 18:16:04+00:00): Because it was too imprecise and included many areas that weren't actually commercial.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
flohoff (2022-05-02 08:34:55+00:00): Moin,
der change hat zu weiten routing änderungn geführt. Das hier z.b.. Rot alt, grün neu. Wenn da wirklich 30 ist ist das sicherlich begründet.

Was hier aber nicht passt das auf den straßen zwar ein maxspeed=30 ist aber ein zone:traffic=DE:urban  und zone:maxspeed=DE:30 - das ist nen bisschen durcheinander.

Ich hätte ja auch eher ein source:maxspeed=DE:zone30 getagged - aber so what.

https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=247599,409594#52.01035,8.69632,15z
flohoff (2022-05-02 10:13:22+00:00): 
Ist natürlich alles quatsch ;) Hab nochmal nachgelesen was zone:traffic ist - Und siehe da - Alles richitg. Das hat mit maxspeed nix zu tun sondern mit Verkehrsregeln. Also alles richtig mit dem DE:urban

Wieder was gelernt.


Flo
JuanCarlos80 (2022-05-02 18:55:51+00:00): Hallo Florian,
vielen Dank fürs Hinterfragen. Ich hatte die Doku diesbezüglich auch noch nicht konsultiert, sondern lediglich die Tags intuitiv verwendet. Jetzt weiß auch ich es genauer.

Ich war auch erstaunt, als ich vor ein paar Tagen da langefahren bin, dass die Hauptachsen in Leopoldshöhe Teil der T30-Zone sind. Da aber einige Viertel verkehrsberuhigte Bereiche sind, ergibt es schon Sinn, die Hauptstraßenlimits nur geringfügig höher zu definieren. Ich vermute, es wurde zusammen mit der vergleichsweise neuen Ostumgehung so geändert.

Gegrüßt
J.
eggie (2022-05-02 06:29:02+00:00): Dag Stephan, 
Op zich  oke, maar de format van de datum wordt meestal anders getagd.
Voorbeeld.. van een juiste format 
(2021 Jan 20-2021 Apr 3) 
Die format zie ik overal. 
Gr eggie
Stephan149 (2022-05-02 06:56:53+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Dank voor de review. Ik heb het aangepast in yes @ (May 1-Sep 1). Ik vraag me alleen nog af of ik nu de tag oneway (dus zonder conditional) weg moet halen.
eggie (2022-05-02 07:03:03+00:00): Het jaar er nog even bij.. 
Het gaat juist om oneway.. dus dat moet erbij. Of het in de praktijk ook werkt.. geen idee. Anders een vraag voor het forum.
Stephan149 (2022-05-02 07:21:43+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Ik kan het jaar er niet bij zetten. Het is namelijk ieder jaar van 1 mei tot 1 september eenrichtingsverkeer. Dus moet juist zonder jaar.
Groeten, Stephan
eggie (2022-05-02 07:32:54+00:00): Ahh.. duidelijk
revent (2022-04-30 17:56:10+00:00): The runway looks off-line from the imagery, it's due to the elevation difference between the runway ends.
SekeRob (2022-05-02 09:10:18+00:00): Hi,

nothing  but foot is from a navigation routing software point of view signified by the fact it is tagged as a footpath, foot=yes an overdo too, but that's what the wizard tags, usually as designated. So happens the DWG confirmed this while discussing a CS where someone did same.
pippo6 (2022-07-12 08:15:59+00:00): Thanks for pointing out. OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Italy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:12:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:11:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
literan (2022-05-03 21:23:09+00:00): в таком случае, я удалил ее по этому адресу.

добавьте ее по новому адресу
masterskaya_aleksandra (2022-05-05 19:14:55+00:00): Партизанская 22 Мастерская Александра.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
◪ Jarv (2022-04-30 20:54:09+00:00): This looks like a zebra crossing not a Pelican.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120394963
Hasnep (2022-04-30 22:50:20+00:00): It is indeed, I'll fix it now
Hasnep (2022-04-30 22:51:35+00:00): Fixed in changeset 120401896
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-01 09:39:28+00:00): Gatvei nereikia nurodinėti addr:city žymos, nes gatvė nėra adresas. Čia yra Piliuona, kas matosi iš greta esančių adresų taškų.
eggie (2022-04-30 20:02:33+00:00): Jolly good JOSM.
cycleway for moped
highway=cycleway
moped=designated
mofa=designated
traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
surface=.... 

Use highway=track in case the route is suites for agricultural vehicles.
A small path with traffic_sign NL:G7 is a footway..  No sign.. In that case highway=path.
Up to you.
Eggie