piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-05-26 08:08:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не удаляйте, пожалуйста, правильные данные. Нет никакого смысла в этой замене:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54036503/history  -->  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691522285  
  
Здесь вы вообще удалили пожарную часть в Винзилях с правильной информацией о здании:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54036498/history -->
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691522384
PT-53 (2019-05-22 07:38:33+00:00): Hallo Andreas,
wenn Adressen angegeben werden, müssen mindestens Haus-Nr. und Straße eingetragen werden. Die restl. Adress-Daten wie Stadt und PLZ sind nicht unbedingt erforderlich, sollten aber nicht alleine eingetragen werden.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
tux67 (2019-05-22 07:07:11+00:00): Hier alles gut .. nur die Öffnungszeiten brauchten ein Update.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70491648
tux67 (2019-05-22 10:14:29+00:00): Auch hier scheint die Position nicht mit der Angabe von der Webseite (Hochstraße 70) übereinzustimmen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70491648
SomeoneElse (2019-08-12 22:34:13+00:00): Hello Sosha1996,
Some of the edits in here were deleted by aminghobadi - see 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4987459733/history etc.
Would you like me to undelete these or do you want to do it?
Best Regards,
Andy
Sosha1996 (2019-08-13 00:39:47+00:00): hi Andy. 
thanks to find this.
i can revert this.
П3тр0виЧъ (2019-05-22 02:58:18+00:00): Здравствуйте.
В чём причина удаления точки района?
Тем более ошибочно, так как удаляя точку place, нужно также удалять и соответствующий полигон.
viloan (2019-05-21 20:24:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
TravGW (2019-05-22 02:34:08+00:00): Fort Sam Houston is a military base and should be tagged as such.
bobeeeze (2019-08-18 08:37:14+00:00): Hello Jenseblume, why do you put so much peak in this area without name and without elevation? What is your source? Is it an import?
bobeeeze (2019-08-18 08:40:36+00:00): And what is your purpose with this?
Jenseblume (2019-08-18 10:24:11+00:00): Hi, I've seen the peaks in contour lines of SRTM-data and added them. For some, I know the exact heights, some have names.
The purpose of this is the reason for what openstreetmap is founded. I don't understand the question. If something ist wrong, feel free to delete it. When we made our summer holidays in this region, i was glad to use osm and i mapped a lot there.
user_5359 (2019-05-24 15:48:20+00:00): Hello! Please use the correct OSM keys for the import! addr:street instead addr_stree and addr:housenumber instead addr_house 
I have correct the imported values.
Alan Bragg (2019-05-24 16:23:15+00:00): Thanks for catching that. I missed a step in a manual processs. 
Alan
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-22 13:04:17+00:00): Thank you for continuing to improve OpenStreetMap. Please could you include a comment when you save, this should state why you made the edit and what source(s) you were using.
More info at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

-Gregory.
kashirskiy (2019-05-22 12:18:39+00:00): почему вы исправили уровень второго этажа на level 1 в здании метро?
Боковые пристройки должны быть того же level что и внутри здания. Это одно целое!
kashirskiy (2019-05-22 13:40:31+00:00): поправил короче
Sanniu (2019-05-22 13:11:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685059701 - is it roundabout?
Carlos Brys (2019-05-25 20:41:58+00:00): Todo este conjunto de cambios debe corregirse porque se etiquetaton erròneamente los "nodos" de los polígonos con area=yes y landcover=tree
4004 (2019-05-25 18:45:34+00:00): thanks!
4004 (2019-05-25 18:46:41+00:00): just to check, did you revert all of his changesets not reverted by Tomas Straupis?
richlv (2019-05-25 19:13:47+00:00): I reverted all cemetery import changesets except one, where the revert had conflicts with changes by Tomas. Perhaps Tomas did manual deletes which caused that.
Dimacn (2019-05-22 17:11:20+00:00): Пожалуйста ознакомьтесь что такое парки отдыха в системе OSM - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  Парки отдыха не могут находиться на частных участках и на придомовой территории. Пожалуйста удалите ваши выдуманные парки.
Glassman (2019-05-21 23:37:24+00:00): can you verify that there is a actual reservoir located here? I can't find any records of it. Only verifiable features should be added to OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70493451
Gerald78945 (2019-05-22 15:12:28+00:00): Thanks for verifying,  you would be correct in terms of it not being an actual reservoir, however, these are two large collection ponds for the neighborhood. Unfortunately while trying to look, was unable to find "pond" and the photo shows them dried up, they ebb and flow.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70493451
Gerald78945 (2019-05-22 15:16:42+00:00): I was able to update accordingly. Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70493451
mbethke (2019-05-22 05:53:55+00:00): Please don't keep mapping your personal POIs
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-22 12:32:24+00:00): can you explain why you added a ford here? doesn't make sense
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-22 12:30:42+00:00): will revert this changeset. you modified the geometry of the legal administrative boundaries.
mhrana98 (2019-11-07 11:08:53+00:00): A whole standard entry would include:

name=<Bangla>
name:bn=<Bangla>
name:en=<English>
mariotomo (2019-08-21 17:46:24+00:00): :+1: :-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-06-13 19:13:19+00:00): Reverted as adding nonexisting shops, in case that you were trying to add something else, you may need to add a proper OpenStreetMap editor, not MAPS.ME
ftrebien (2019-11-08 12:33:42+00:00): Por que a classificação da rua Arlindo Fasolo foi rebaixada de secundária para terciária se a via é arterial no plano diretor e melhor rota entre vários bairros na região leste (Eucaliptos, Vila Nova, Licorsul, etc.) e os bairros na região norte (Nossa Senhora do Carmo, São Valentin) e o distrito de Tuiuty?
xtd (2019-11-08 12:39:13+00:00): Comparando com vias secundárias ao redor, parecia ter estrutura inferior. Se não for o caso, pode voltar! Abraços
ftrebien (2019-11-08 15:07:36+00:00): Voltei. Quase sempre a classificação funcional leva a um resultado melhor do que a baseada estritamente em características físicas, exceto em situações extremas (eg.: ausência de pavimentação numa região onde predomina o pavimentado, ou estreitamentos como o da rua Elisei Grasselli, que deveria ser secundária com base no plano diretor e nas melhores rotas entre os bairros). Alguns sistemas de roteamento mais simples precisam que de ligações tenham a mesma classe do sistema ao redor para encontrar as melhores rotas de passagem. Já sistemas que não usam a classificação como heurística (OSRM, GraphHopper) não são afetados contanto que esteja mapeado o limite de velocidade (caso dessa via e das vias ao redor). Outro indicativo de que via deveria ter uma classe mais alta é o tráfego intenso visível no Strava.
skquinn (2019-05-22 00:11:26+00:00): Please keep changesets within the smallest area possible. The bounding box for this changeset stretches over most of the US, all of Mexico and Central America, most of South America, Hawaii, about half of Africa, and a good chunk of Europe, despite only 7 items being changed.
bjankuloski (2019-05-22 00:25:05+00:00): Thanks for the advice. I don't think I have have changed anything encompassing such a wide area in one changeset (at least I don't remember doing so), with the possible exception of seas/oceans, which is a single change that is wide by default.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-05-22 14:34:07+00:00): acredito que essa poderia ser uma secundária já que é uma rodovia estadual asfaltada. não?
DressyPear4 (2019-05-22 20:34:49+00:00): só achei estranho ser só um "pedaço" de secundária, geralmente elas fazem conexão com vias de maior hierarquia.
frosm (2020-01-10 17:09:03+00:00): bonjour,
la route traverse 2 terrains de foot ?
le bâtiments traversé à chaque extrémité n'a pas l'air non plus d'encore exister.
cordialement.
unnsyeda (2020-01-16 11:09:34+00:00): Hi frosm,

Replying on behalf of dvvuyyur. Thanks for looking into the edit. Mapper has used Bing Aerial and Esri World Imagery as source to make these edits. I would request you to please make any further changes required to the edit performed by dvvuyyur as you have the local knowledge of the area. Let me know in case you have any other suggestions. Always happy to learn from the local community.

Thanks,
unnsyeda
frosm (2020-01-16 12:18:15+00:00): Hello,

My remark was meant to be humorous to say that if the contributor noticed that a new road had been created, he probably also noticed that soccer pitchs were destroyed.
so he could delete them, or if his professional orders don't allow him to spend time on it, make a note instead of tracing a route through the existing objects without coherence.
I don't have any particular local knowledge here but in the meantime I have used satellite imagery and the cadastre to remove pitchs, add street names and new houses.
Regards.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-22 02:17:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70497197 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:14:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570355 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:13:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570340 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:12:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570331 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:11:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570324 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:11:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570317 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:10:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570310 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:10:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570301 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:09:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570292 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:07:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570271 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:06:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570254 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
freebeer (2019-05-22 05:34:47+00:00): Hallo,
In a number of recent edits over the US, you have used maps.me to create lots of unnamed highway rest areas in implausible locations.

Notes you have opened for some of these hint they are mostly addresses and others have no useful info or imply they are personal bookmarks of no use to other mappers or to osm.

Do you understand what a rest area is, or is it badly translated into french by maps.me, as i see it often misused in many countries?

I believe these changesets should be reverted, as the only useful info is contained in notes positioned at the nodes, unless some other mapper wants to convert each rest_area node into an address node and add the info from the associated note (not something i can do from the commandline unlike a revert, and which can be done from the notes contents without polluting  the map with bogus rest areas).

please use address nodes for marking addresses and only use rest areas for mapping highway (such as interstate) features.

apologies for not writing in french.

merci
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:04:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570223 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
viloan (2019-05-22 02:11:50+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
freebeer (2019-05-24 02:02:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70570205 where the changeset comment is: please stop creating maps.me bogus unlabelled rest areas, and learn what a rest area actually is in osm, as it is not a building.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-22 02:17:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 70496736.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-22 02:37:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70497471 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a persistent sockpuppet in Rochester.  See block 2548 et al
viloan (2019-05-22 02:33:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-22 02:37:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 70497289.
viloan (2019-05-22 02:43:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
stephankn (2020-09-06 09:24:17+00:00): Thailand culture might be unfamiliar to you, but a temple is not a retail building... way 691555047
mapman44 (2019-05-24 05:53:57+00:00): Thanks for your edits in the Coos Bay area, but could you please leave comments that give a little more information about your changes. Looks like this one had nothing to do with railway or railroads.
gecho111 (2019-05-22 03:25:57+00:00): Once and a while I'll look at the Regina area using the KeepRight validation tool to spot anything amiss.  https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=12&lat=50.3297&lon=-104.9713

The last editor of the way field doesn't necessarily indicate the user who introduced the problem.

I think for the close but no connect errors, where there shouldn't be a connection (such as parking aisles ending at a curb), a noexit=yes tag will satisfy the validator.
Yous'B (2019-05-22 04:10:06+00:00): J'aime cartographié
mavl (2019-07-21 15:57:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:57:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Warin61 (2019-10-28 00:23:45+00:00): Hi,
Altered the Men's Shed to match https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#Mens_Shed
stephankn (2020-09-06 12:47:59+00:00): way 691557377 is certainly not a 396 meter height building.
Also: they key to tag house-numbers is "addr:housenumber". Please use the right tags and not abuse the name tag. Please revisit this area and fix your tagging.
stephankn (2020-09-06 12:48:56+00:00): way 691557378 as well
stephankn (2020-09-06 12:49:43+00:00): and way 691557376
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:45:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:46:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
aseerel4c26 (2019-05-22 05:35:03+00:00): Hi kartonage, meinst du nicht, dass es richtiger ist, wie es vorher war (der Knoten 5353157871 nicht Teil von way 691092658)? Der Knoten (entrance = main) sollte nur Teil vom großen Gebäude sein - zum (schätzungsweise) Vordach/Eingangsbereich ist dieser Knoten ja nicht der Haupteingang.
Viele Grüße!
kartonage (2019-05-22 14:16:15+00:00): Hej aseerel4c26,

ich weiß was du meinst. Die Problematik dabei ist immer, dass man es irgendwie schwer richtig machen kann. Ohne die Verbindung existiert in OSM eine Lücke zwischen Vordach/Eingangsbereich und Gebäude von 1 mm. Wenn man den Vorbereich zum Gebäude mit dazu nehmen würde und mit building:part arbeiten würde, hätte man ein ähnliches Problem. Auf dem Luftbild DigitalGlobe Vivid sieht es für mich so aus als wäre es ein bisschen mehr als nur ein Vordach und erinnert mich an einen anderen Rewe bei dem das einen offenen Vorbau mit Seitenwänden ist.

Was ich aber gerade überlege: Wenn der Eingang jetzt vom Vordach losgelöst werden sollte, dann ist er nicht mehr Teil dessen, aber behält die Position. Dann sollten die Linien eigentlich Deckungsgleich sein (waren sie ja vorher nicht). Das wäre so irgendwie die Mitte aus beidem. 

Schöne Grüße
aseerel4c26 (2019-05-24 19:55:16+00:00): Danke für deine nette Antwort! :-)

Vorneweg: ich kenne den Ort nicht selbst. Ich hab mal athalis Bescheid über diese Diskussion gegeben.

In 1mm regnet es schon nicht rein. ;-) Genauer geht es halt mit unserer Koordinatengenauigkeit nicht, damit muss man leben, finde ich. Die logische Zuordnung des Eingangs ist aber wichtig.

Zum Vorschlag in deinem letzten Absatz: aber das ist doch die Situation, wie es vorher war?!

Viele Grüße!
kartonage (2019-05-25 05:11:51+00:00): Vorher war dort ein Spalt. Allerdings nur beim Eingangsknoten, während beide Flächen an den anderen Enden verbunden waren. Das ist eine minimale Abweichung, aber sie ist vorhanden gewesen. Ganz unerheblich ist das für Renderprozesse nicht, auch wenn es marginal ist (und kleinlich, ich weiß. ;-) )

Ich habe den Knoten jetzt mal vom Vorgebäude testweise wieder getrennt. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70604080) Ein Spalt ist für mich jetzt nicht mehr ersichtlich. Theoretisch liegen beide Gebäude jetzt auch dicht an dicht an. Logisch haut das dann ja auch hin.

Schöne Grüße
aseerel4c26 (2019-05-25 07:44:13+00:00): Vielleicht ist jetzt keine Millimeterlücke mehr da, weil du ja nicht nur den Knoten vom Vorgebäude getrennt hast, sondern auch die vier Vorgebäudeecken und den Eingang leicht verschoben hast.

Du findest es gut jetzt, ich finde es gut jetzt - so bleibt's! :-D

Frohes Mappen!
mavl (2019-07-21 15:57:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
woodpeck (2019-06-21 12:38:02+00:00): In the future when you revert edits, please explain clearly why you are reverting. The fact that the edits are made by one particular mapper and/or your suspicion that he might be identical to another particular mapper are not sufficient grounds for a revert; you should be able to give a concrete reason for each particular revert.
nikospag (2019-06-22 01:53:40+00:00): Hm...i wonder why DWG bothers with a ""revert"" of just one node.
Bye Frederik.
nikospag (2019-06-22 04:58:16+00:00): PS. All real reverts (there are only a few) that i have done in 7 years, are very well commented with concrete reasons.
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-22 13:00:03+00:00): It is unusual for highway=service to only be accessible via highway=track. Please can you review what value the ways should actually have.