piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
barnes38 (2018-04-02 08:39:51+00:00): Voilà j'ai fait au mieux en reconnectant les chemins. J'avais fait pas mal de choses à Tullins sur la zone d'activité du Peuras et autour
Désolé et merci de me l'avoir signalé!
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:21:13+00:00): Hello jseigneuret. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/415294772 you have introduced the new key `Marché`. Could it be the `name`? #newkey
Viajero Perdido (2019-12-16 23:24:48+00:00): Hi Scott.

I came across these polygons while editing in the area, also some similar polygons farther south while editing a few months ago.

Do you find these polygons serve a purpose in their current state?  I ask because they don't render on the standard map, and I'm not aware of any map where they *would* render.

For the polygons farther south, I've taken the liberty of adding a few tags, eg boundary=protected area, and now those are indeed more visible.  For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7550130/history

If this makes sense to you, you might like to consider similar changes to the polygons in other areas, such as here.

Note that I'm reluctant to use the "name" tag for something that more truly is a description, and I'd been unable to find any official names for the areas I'd modified down south.

Cheers,
VP
Alberta mapper visiting BC.  :)
Scott_Nelson_imports (2019-12-17 06:53:20+00:00): These polygons used to be rendered by opensledmap.org when I imported them, but that map has now disappeared from the internet.  I think it's likely that a snowmobile or winter sports specific map layer will pick them up in the future.  I have been using them myself for a map project I am working on.

I don't think it makes sense to tag these the same as provincial or national parks because they are not.  They are simply an area where one specific activity (snowmobiling) is prohibited.
Viajero Perdido (2019-12-17 16:18:56+00:00): A sled-specific map, that would be a perfect user of this data; too bad it's gone.

Note that with the changes I made farther south, it isn't tagged the same as a park, but some renderers will display it the same as one.  BTW, I just checked the latest openandromaps (which are outdoor-focused and work well in Locus Map, ditto), and with my tweaks, PS001 etc. do show up as protected areas there.  These are maps a sled rider might carry in their phone.

Your call.  Feel free to undo my changes to PS001 etc. farther south (or ask me to) if you feel these areas don't belong on standard maps.  

Cheers,
VP
user_5359 (2017-09-27 18:17:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
eggie (2017-09-27 08:50:56+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-27 08:58:00+00:00): Gebouwen worden geïmporteerd vanuit het kadaster. het is niet de bedoeling om gebouwen te gaan veranderen. Wanneer iets niet klopt dan kun je dit aan het kadaster doorgeven. Het verzoek is je even te beperken in je edits en je goed in te lezen. Zie welkomstmail.
eggie (2017-09-27 09:29:46+00:00): Je kunt wanneer de uitbouw met een bouwvergunning is gerealiseerd een update aanvragen op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG update.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Inlog idem als osm account
eggie (2017-09-27 09:11:57+00:00): Zo'n klein stukje groen kun je taggen als landuse=village_green
eggie (2017-09-27 09:40:28+00:00): Dit moet je maar toevallig weten. ..
Je kunt een BAG update aanvragen. Dan blijft de data kloppend. 
Dat wordt echt serieus opgepakt.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=665549#p665549
Doe je dit zelf?
eggie (2017-09-27 09:24:46+00:00): Je edit concreet aangeven svp. Dus: landuse grass verwijderd.
eggie (2017-09-27 09:37:17+00:00): oke......maar je edit is changed building = yes into barn
Hadi Omid (2017-09-28 16:42:14+00:00): سلام
لطفا اطلاعات شخصی رو بصورت عمومی منتشر نکنید.

ممنون
eggie (2017-09-27 09:23:23+00:00): Je kunt het checken in de BAAG viewer en evt een terugmelding doen bij het kadaster via deze site: https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=enter&resultOffset=0&objectId=1088&geometry.x=235786.97406153&geometry.y=478978.60878467&zoomlevel=4&detailsObjectId=1088
user_6110846 (2017-09-27 19:17:27+00:00): Чому name на українській , а вто й же час табличка магазину на російській мові. Це пряме порушення on ground. Що на вивісці - те й має бути і у  name. Виправіть будь-ласка. І не забувайте по це надалі.
Alex-7 (2017-09-27 20:48:35+00:00): Дійсно. Зараз виправлю. Дякуємо.
eggie (2017-09-27 09:14:14+00:00): Geen adressen toevoegen svp. Het zit op de adresnode
eggie (2017-09-27 17:14:39+00:00): adres verwijderd van gebouw
eggie (2017-09-27 17:17:42+00:00): Ahh .. 'k zie al een volledige BAG update
eggie (2017-09-27 09:12:23+00:00): oke
mueschel (2019-12-22 11:19:02+00:00): Hi,
I found three ways like this one:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528061032
They have to mtb:scale:uphill tags:
mtb:scale:uphill = 5
mtb:scale:uphill_1 = 2

Could you check which one is right?
Walk60 (2023-01-10 13:00:28+00:00): Sorry, the value "2" is on the tag mtb:scale:imba
....
eggie (2017-09-27 09:19:06+00:00): oke.. goede edit
eggie (2017-09-27 09:18:26+00:00): Het gebouw heet niet Mullertransport. wanneer dat hier zit graag op de adresnode bijvoegen met de juiste aard van het bedrijf. Zie wiki.
eggie (2017-09-27 17:13:42+00:00): naam naar adresnode verplaatst
eggie (2017-09-27 09:13:27+00:00): gebouw aangepast.. Weer adres toegevoegd. dat staat al op de adresnode.
eggie (2017-09-27 17:07:46+00:00): adres verwijderd
eggie (2017-09-27 09:10:32+00:00): Ook hier voeg je weer adressen aan de gebouwen toe.. Het gebouw heeft ook geen naam. De info van de firma hoort op de adresnode.
eggie (2017-09-27 09:08:57+00:00): Dit is misschien wel een goed verbetering, maar je verwijdert alle info van mapper Stijnenter. Bij OSM gaan we dan overleggen met de voorgaande mapper.
eggie (2017-09-27 08:54:32+00:00): Probeer concreet te zijn in je edits. 
Dus: Wandelpad verwijderd.

Waarom.. Wanneer je er niet mag komen kun je access=private erbij zetten
tuxayo (2017-10-02 18:10:25+00:00): La zone avec du gazon n'est pas un parc n'est-ce pas?
CharlesNepote (2017-10-02 18:16:21+00:00): Non en effet, c'est seulement une zone avec du gazon (synthétique) mais je suis allé au plus simple. Peut-être il y a un meilleur tag.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:41:11+00:00): Hello Hagar66. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5132632089 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5132632087 you have tagged `public_transporrt` instead of `public_transport`, right? #typo
WiebkeCHH (2017-09-29 20:33:22+00:00): someone fixed before I had the chance to. :-)
eggie (2017-09-27 08:55:09+00:00): Algemenen verbetering is veel te vaag. Graag concreet ....
eggie (2017-09-27 08:56:16+00:00): Ik kan niet zien wat je in dit gebied hebt gedaan. Wat was je edit?
eggie (2017-09-27 17:00:51+00:00): Dit was je edit: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52407379
eggie (2017-09-27 09:04:56+00:00): Oneway no hoort niet op een reguliere weg. Het is een waarschuwing voor andere mappers om er niet oneway yes van te maken.
eggie (2017-09-27 09:03:27+00:00): Gebouwen zelf hebben geen adres. dat staat al op de adres node.
Graag reactie..... Inmiddels al 2 PB's gestuurd.
eggie (2017-09-27 16:57:59+00:00): reverted
ChrissW-R1 (2025-04-30 12:23:54+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4735299
Harald Hartmann (2017-12-03 09:27:29+00:00): Hello Hashaam. 

Could it be that you and Arshan Arshan doing some imports?

Please have a look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=24.82526&lon=67.05808

You have mapped "buildings" as node (a little bit uncommon), and Arshan Arshan now map the building outline around it?

Please see the other changeset comment of Arshan Arshan
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54273430
eggie (2017-09-27 09:41:11+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-27 09:44:00+00:00): tip... geef als concreet  commentaar: reshape road of weg goed gelegd. 
source = kadaster pdok 2016
eggie (2017-09-27 09:49:13+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52407732
Tip: Begin nooit met access=no
dan kunnen die andere tags er ook af. Een fietser mag immers op een fietspad fietsen. Autoverkeer gaat nooit routeren op een fietspad.
Hier de accesstags voor Nederland:
Groen is default.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
flohoff (2017-09-27 14:12:00+00:00): Hi,
ich habe den Lidl wieder entfernt. Der existierte schon etwa 50m weiter Nord-Westlich

Flo
GerdP (2017-09-28 04:59:05+00:00): Hi!
I've fixed typo highway=driveway here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292583076
but I think you should review the access tags.I think it is better to have them on the way, not only on the gates. Maybe split the way at the gate. Besides that I wonder why you set access=destination and overwrite it with yes for almost everything at the gates.
wmyrda (2017-09-28 06:34:50+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś informację z tego obiektu http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/293934494 ?
maraf24 (2017-09-28 09:51:33+00:00): "source=uwaga"
Uwaga jest dokładnie w tym miejscu.
maraf24 (2017-09-28 09:56:15+00:00): I nie usuwałem informacji, ale nazwę, która nie była nazwą, ale opisem. I jeśli opis byłby prawdziwy, to z automatu był do usunięcia, bo nie mapujemy nieistniejących budynków.
wmyrda (2017-09-28 09:58:06+00:00): W którym? Wskaż mnie to miejsce bo ja nie widzę informacji o zdewastowanym schronie ani w polu name ani żadnym innym
wmyrda (2017-09-28 09:59:28+00:00): Nawet coś było opisem to należało przesunąć do opisu a nie kasować. Pamiętaj, że nadgorliwość jest gorsza od faszyzmu
maraf24 (2017-09-28 10:02:36+00:00): Nie rozumiem pytania z przedostatniego komentarza.
Co do ostatniego - to nieuprzejmie i uważam, że za daleko się posuwasz.
Wszystkie dane masz podane jak na tacy, weź się do roboty.
wmyrda (2017-09-28 10:16:42+00:00): Szanownego kolegę uprasza się po raz trzeci o wskazanie gdzie przeniósł informację o zniszczonym obiekcie. jeśli został on usunięty to usunięcie było nie na miejscu.

Wszelkie komentarze jakie zamieszczam są zawsze adekwatne do sytuacji. Co do twojej odpowiedzi "weź się do roboty." powiem i vice versa. Zamiast usuwać informacje przez siebie niewprowadzoną i to na terenie którego opiekunem nie jesteś dodaj coś od siebie.
Nakaner (2017-10-08 11:52:47+00:00): Hallo navig,

könntest du mir bitte erklären, was das hier soll? Bitte verwende aussagekräftige Änderungssatzkommentare, wenn du Änderungen zu OSM hochlädst, damit andere Mitwirkende deine Änderungen nachvollziehen können. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße

Michael
navig (2017-10-08 16:24:32+00:00): Fix heißt bei mir, ich habe Wege hinzugefügt. Da ich ca 2700 Einträge hier getätigt habe, ist für mehr keine Zeit. Es genügt mir "Fix", was der Rest  der OSM Community so akzeptier. Mehr schreibe ich dazu nicht mehr.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 19:41:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52740330 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 52408729 (changed railway=rail to railway=abandoned which has been recently changed to railway=rail but user refuses to give reasons)
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:26:04+00:00): Hello danielperezglez. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26417446 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86308808 you have introduced the new key `name_v`. It should be `name:<isocode>`. Please have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization
Please review your changes ;-)
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:24:04+00:00): Hello danielperezglez. In this and other changesets (around http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26563876) you have tagged `name_es` instead of `name:es`, right? #typo
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-07 15:36:11+00:00): Hello!

You used
cycleway=aslb
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5132750414/history

Have you maybe meant
cycleway=asl
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
naomap (2018-01-17 15:30:55+00:00): Bonjour Shoreh.
Merci pour ces mises à jour. J'ai une question sur la Rue d'Hébecourt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25413732) : tu as d'abord enlevé le sens unique puis ajouté le contre-sens cyclable. Celui-ci est inutile sur une voie à double sens. La rue est-elle vraiment à double sens ?
Merci, 
Antoine.
Shohreh (2018-01-17 18:39:05+00:00): Bonjour,

Elle est en sens unique pour les voitures, mais il y a aussi un panneau 15km/h, donc c'est du genre "zone de rencontre", ce qui signifie qu'elle est par  nature en double-sens pour les cyclistes sans besoin de le marquer spécifiquement.

Je m'y suis peut-être mal pris pour indiquer cet état.
Carto'Cité (2018-01-17 19:00:20+00:00): Si elle est en sens unique pour les voitures il est utile de garder oneway=yes, et du coup cycleway=opposite (juste opposite s'il n'y a pas à proprement parler de bande cycable).
Le sens de circulation est bien de la rue Chauvelot vers la rue Savier ?
Merci, Antoine (cette fois avec le bon compte ;-).
Shohreh (2018-01-17 19:23:25+00:00): Ok, tu es chargé chef de projet de la rue :-)
Carto'Cité (2018-01-17 19:28:15+00:00): Merci :-)  J'ai fait la modif.
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-12-23 19:17:38+00:00): Did you mean "swing"? not "swng"
SK53 (2017-12-23 20:57:41+00:00): probably
SK53 (2017-12-23 21:09:08+00:00): Adding a link to the relevant way makes it a bit easier to check. Yes it should be swing on Old Goole Bridge. As the edit was to stop routers avoiding these bridges: it worked as I intended, even if I didnt quite use the right tag
eggie (2017-09-27 10:58:43+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
John-O (2017-09-27 16:58:52+00:00): Why `path` as opposed to `footway` ?
From memory there are three cairns in at least one of the locations. They are more like carefully constructed rock pillar than a pile of stones
gurglypipe (2017-09-28 00:43:37+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path; it’s not urban. Feel free to improve the cairn mapping; I was just fixing the tagging.
ACS1986 (2017-09-28 11:43:27+00:00): Hi,
I agree with John on this.
The fact that a Wiki editor thinks that you should use highway=footway for urban paths doesn't mean that highway=path has to be used for non-urban paths. Choice between 'Classic' (highway=footway/bridleway/cycleway) and 'Alternative' (highway=path) tagging methods has always been a matter of personal choice (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Classic_vs_Alternative_tagging_schemes ) 
In the UK footway has always been by far the most commonly used tag for both urban and rural footpaths.

Bearing in mind that by default highway=footway and highway=path imply different levels of access (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_Kingdom), it is inadvisable to set about 'correcting' other people's footways to paths, especially without verifying on the ground and adding the access tags the highway=path system of tagging was designed to utilise
Kind regards,
Adam
gurglypipe (2017-09-29 13:27:49+00:00): Ah, this is more complex than I thought. I was just going off the descriptions of highway={footway,path} in iD. I have not verified the path’s access restrictions in person, although given the area they’re probably going to be the same as the shooting track since it’s all moorland under the same land owner.

Unless anyone’s been there recently and can confidently say the access restrictions, I’d suggest changing it back to highway=footway to be conservative.

Thanks for the pointers!
ACS1986 (2017-09-30 14:09:45+00:00): Thanks, and you're welcome. Unfortunately there is inconsistency in how these tags are used between countries. It is common in some places (particularly Germany) to use 'footway' for urban paths and 'path' for rural ones and that's probably some of the views in the Wiki and the ID descriptions arise. If data consumers really want to distinguish urban and rural paths they should be a ble to do so without a specific tag. In reality, the surface tag http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface is a more useful means of conveying the character of a path.
Kind regards,
Adam
SomeoneElse (2017-10-02 09:20:55+00:00): Just to chime in here, +1 to Adam and John above.
The mailing lists have lots of detail on how highway=path came about when highway=footway etc. already existed, and certainly highway=path is widely used in e.g. Germany for what we would call "a footpath"
If something "looks like something you can mostly just walk along" then I'd go with footway - and I'd also try and add other tags (e.g. designation=public_footpath if relevant).  Data consumers will mostly combine the two through - see https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=17&lat=54.038362&lon=-2.70471 for my take on that (which also shows the cairns FWIW).
gurglypipe (2017-10-02 09:27:35+00:00): Thanks. Although the fact that the UK seems to rely on all contributors having read the mailing list archive (or asking repeat questions on the mailing list) is somewhat frustrating. That’s really the point of having a wiki.
SomeoneElse (2017-10-02 09:43:47+00:00): One problem with the wiki (or any wiki) is that it's difficult for it to get across the key points of where there are conflicting views.  The "classic vs alternate" table is one of the better examples of doing that, where Harry Wood (I think) spent a lot of time putting it all together.
More often the wiki just represents the last wiki editor's opinion, and some people like to spend a _lot_ of time editing the wiki and not doing much mapping.  No one has to read the history on highway=path vs highway=footway; I was just saying that the discussion was there as a matter of public record.
4004 (2017-09-27 12:50:14+00:00): Спасибо, что дополняете карту,
Пару вопросов: ваш магазин занимает все указанное здание? Также отмечу невозможное значение параметра этажности (-5). И описание типа заведения в название не добавляется - то есть просто "Огород", как и я и исправлю
4004 (2017-09-27 12:51:23+00:00): ну и раз у вас интернет магазин, то стоило бы добавить ссылку на сайт
mosstreet (2017-09-28 21:07:13+00:00): поправил по трассе, название все же правильнее Амур - Джалинда
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 15:55:12+00:00): Hello Antonio Gomez Garcia. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23215566 you have tagged `destinaiton` instead of `destination`, right? #typo
Patata mapeadora (2017-10-04 07:48:15+00:00): Ups yes I did type it wrong, I meant to type 'destination', my bad.
GerdP (2020-05-30 06:45:49+00:00): Hi!. You removed all the members of this route relation. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2083896
Was that intended?
AYAGE (2020-05-30 12:50:11+00:00): Its my mistake. very thanks.
eggie (2017-09-27 11:38:40+00:00): Nu staat op het vlak Heuvel en op de doorgaande weg Korte Heuvel.
Kun je dit nog aanpassen?
Wanneer in de volksmond Korte heuvel wordt gebruikt zou je dit als alt_name=  kunnen toevoegen.
Graag reactie
Azca_ (2017-09-27 11:08:03+00:00): Source : local shops and restaurants
mavl (2017-09-27 13:06:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Так это не Тобольск. На мосты ещё обычно добавляют тег "layer".
BeKri (2017-09-28 11:29:35+00:00): Servus,
Du bist so nett und trägst Strassenname und Hausnummer richtig rum ein ? Danke !
eggie (2017-09-27 11:39:26+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-27 11:40:57+00:00): Is hier niet al een BAG adresnode 2b?
eggie (2017-09-27 11:43:55+00:00): niet aangetroffen... :)
ToniE (2017-09-27 11:43:27+00:00): ausgebaut -> aufgebaut
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:38:37+00:00): Hallo Fredi Stephany. Was soll das `Petra Pellegrinon` als Schlüssel bedeuten? Das wäre neu und undokumentiert.
PT-53 (2017-09-28 08:16:06+00:00): Hallo pebogufi,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an der "Burg Hohenzollern" den Value für den Key castle_type:de von burg auf Burg geändert. Keys und Values werden in OSM üblicherweise generell klein geschrieben. Siehe auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:castle_type:de

Du hast auch noch den Eintrag barrier=city_wall gelöscht. Warum ?
PT-53 (2017-10-01 09:04:07+00:00): Den Wert für castle:type hast Du zwischenzeitlich wieder auf burg zurückgesetzt. Aber was ist mit dem gelöschten Eintrag barrier=city_wall ?
pebogufi (2017-10-03 10:36:05+00:00): 1. castle_type:de burg -> Burg.
Du hast Recht, meine Änderung entspricht nicht dem wiki, ich habe sie wieder korrigiert. Normalerweise sind tags mit Sprachkürzel keine Kategorien sondern Bezeichnungen und unterliegen damit den jeweligen Regeln der Sprache. (Das Kleingeschreiben von Values betriftt nur Kategorien, nicht aber Bezeichnungen).
Ich denke das wiki ist hier unscharf: Landestypisch wird mit sprachtypisch vermischt oder verwechselt. 

Im Übrigen wäre ohnehin castle_type=stately vermutlich korrekter, denn beim Bau der recht neuen Anlage war der Repräsentationszweck neben dem musealen Zweck im Vordergrund. Aber ich lasse das so, denn die Herren der Burg bezeichnen es vom Namen her als Burg.

2. barrier=city_wall ist meines Erachtens falsch, denn das betreffende Polygon bezieht sich auf das Gesamtobjekt, die
"Burg Hohenzollern", korrekt getagt als historic=castle, castle_type=defensive, etc.
Das Gesamtobjekt, "Burg Hohenzollern" ist sicher nicht gleichzeitg eine city_wall, insbesondere nicht "city...".

Ich habe auch weitere barrier=city_wall in der Burg korrigiert, denn da hat jemand so ziemlich jedes Mäuerchen in der Burg fälschlicherweise als barrier=city_wall deklariert. (siehe caste_wall)

Im Übrigen, ich war letzte Woche auf der Burg, besuche du sie doch auch mal, dann können wir gerne weitere Details diskutieren. Bei Vergleichen von Details vor Ort mit den Tags schien mir noch manches diskussionswürdig. Aber es wäre sinnvoll, wenn man sich dazu mehrere Burgen und Schlösser ansehen würde, vor Ort und in OSM und im wiki.
user_4493657 (2017-10-20 21:25:55+00:00): Witam. Dlaczego zmieniłeś highway=residental na highway=tertiary?poprzednie oznaczenie było wystarczające dla tej bocznej drogi. Tym bardziej, że natężenie ruchu na 249D jest niewspółmiernie większe niż na 2504D. Fajnie, ze dodajesz numer dróg, jednak proszę rozważnie zmieniać kategorię dróg.
maraf24 (2017-10-22 20:13:15+00:00): Zapewne nie jeździ na nawigacji korzystającej z danych OSM.
user_4493657 (2017-10-22 21:44:26+00:00): Też tak podejrzewam, bo gdyby jeździł rowerem po okolicy, już nie wspomnę po prawo jazdy, którego na 100% nie ma i doświadczenie w terenie to nie robiłby takich głupot.
user_4493657 (2017-10-22 21:46:42+00:00): Dzięki za naprawienie.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:44:34+00:00): Hello Лях. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448961742 and around you tagged all buildings with `roof:hiet` instead of `roof:height` or `roof:levels`, right? #typo
Лях (2017-09-29 18:16:55+00:00): End?..
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 18:54:42+00:00): You have tagged `roof:hiet` ... do you think this is okay?
Лях (2017-09-29 19:08:47+00:00): I know English badly, maybe somewhere was wrong ...
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 19:10:11+00:00): `roof:hiet` <- not ok
`roof:height` <- ok
Лях (2017-09-29 19:11:53+00:00): Corrected, thank you!
Falsernet (2023-07-20 01:51:17+00:00): Why have you removed the tag when according to the wiki it was tagged correctly? (See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=services?uselang=en-GB)
nyuriks (2017-09-27 23:15:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for fixing the link!  Please add wikidata tags when adding wikipedia. JOSM can do it automatically using "Fetch IDs" in Wikipedia plugin.  Also, please help with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Link_Improvement_Project if you can. Thanks!
下り専門 (2017-09-28 11:19:52+00:00): Thank you for a notice. I installed Wikipedia plugin and I will try it next time.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 15:35:36+00:00): Hello ff5722. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528115953 you have tagged `ay=1` instead of `layer=1`, right? #typo
ff5722 (2017-09-29 15:52:29+00:00): correct, i just fixed it, thanks for notifying me
j-wills (2017-09-27 19:23:08+00:00): ПамятЬник - это пять !!! ;))))