piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-09-15 21:08:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
gpserror (2020-05-27 02:31:35+00:00): I don't quite understand these two relations:
 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10042200 (broken no u-turn)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10042201 (only u-turn)

Looking at streetview these shouldn't be there... since you have version 1, curious what you know about these turn restrictions?

I may delete these TRs in a bit if I don't hear back... Thanks.
viloan (2019-09-15 21:20:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Morten Lange (2020-07-04 14:44:21+00:00): Det ser ut som at navnet på Halfdan Wilhelmsens allé feilaktig har blitt endret til Kaptein Hoffs allé. Se Norgeskart, 1881, gatenavnskilt, lokalhistoriewiki, wikipedia etc.
Kan du rette opp?
Noen (2020-07-06 12:07:42+00:00): Hei! Det skal være rettet opp i nå.
Morten Lange (2020-07-07 16:20:27+00:00): Takk, flott  :- )
jmapb (2022-05-29 01:46:03+00:00): Howdy, is the 2nd Ave segment in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9127857 an error?
TheBestIdea (2022-05-31 17:17:36+00:00): So that block is a south bound bike route, but your right, it probably shouldn't be part of the 44th St relation. I guess I'll make it it's own route relation since that's the only way to have directional bike routes (for data users like the Cycle Map layer that render that)
TheBestIdea (2022-05-31 17:19:28+00:00): There also are supposed to be sharrows on that block, but they have never been painted so I'll put in a 311 ticket for that
abrensch (2019-09-22 20:11:27+00:00): Hallo seawolff,

hier hast Du wohl eine Hälfte dieser Gabel der "Hummelwiese" gelöscht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=54.3113&mlon=10.127131#map=19/54.31130/10.12713&layers=N
seawolff (2019-09-22 23:28:35+00:00): Ja, mit Absicht.
Seit letzter Woche ist die Zufahrt von der Hummelwiese zur Kreuzung dauerhaft gesperrt.
ma-rt-in (2019-09-16 15:50:22+00:00): Hallo,
ist der Weg wirklich ein wirtschaftsweg oder doch wie vorher ein service weg?
helicoducair (2019-09-16 23:42:38+00:00): Der Weg wird einerseits von LKW benutzt, die dort be- bzw. entladen und vom Stellwerkspersonal. Ich bin mir auch nicht sicher ob Service- oder Wirtschaftsweg, aber ich verstehe nicht richtig warum weder service noch track vom Routingalgorithmus als befahrbare Straßen angesehen werden...
ma-rt-in (2019-09-17 06:29:56+00:00): Hallo,
allgemein würde hier besser service passen, das track doch eher bei Wegen zu Forst/Landwirtschaftichen Flächen eingesetzt wird. 
Zum Routing: Nur weil die Art des Weges geändert wird, heißt das nicht das der Router ihn jetzt strikt meidet.
Gibt es vor Ort eine Beschilderung am wege?
vg
helicoducair (2019-09-17 21:06:09+00:00): Nein, eine Beschilderung gibt es meines Wissens nicht...
ma-rt-in (2019-09-17 21:07:00+00:00): Dann erübrigt sich auch das setzen von Straßenbeschränkungen.
Burisma (2019-09-15 22:37:37+00:00): Hi AqabaShark,
why have you deleted your recently mapped buildings again: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74507590 ?
tordans (2019-09-17 05:22:12+00:00): Hi !bm, siehst du einen Vorteil im mappen als Linie? Ich habe es auch ein paar mal überlegt. Aktuelle lege ich aber auch die länglich an der Straße verlaufenden Ständer als Punkt oder als sehr schmale Fläche an (bspw. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.49202/13.43265). Ein Vorteil ist, dass es dann auch gerendered wird. Gibt es andere Vor/Nachteile?
!bm (2019-09-17 21:57:57+00:00): Hi, dzt leider nicht, aus genanntem Grund (Rendering - wobei: man soll ja nicht nur dafür mappen). Meine Idee war, dass a) einfach Anfang/Ende bestimmt sowie b) es auch als Barriere sichtbar würde. In CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74599722#map=19/52.47555/13.43944&layers=N habe ich nun noch einen zweiten Versuch gewagt. Renderer bevorzugen aber anscheinend Punkte gegenüber Flächen, die mitunter überproportional sein müssen, um dargestellt zu werden. Zu weiteren Vor/Nachteilen müsste man ggf gesondert diskutieren.
Burisma (2019-09-15 22:56:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/724809398 lacks a 4th corner
Jrachi (2019-10-15 14:08:41+00:00): Vorrei segnalarti che hai inserito dei tag inappropriati:
Il "sentiero" percorre, grosso modo la dorsale del monte Lera, ma non ha nome.
Hai messo un valore mtb?? Ma ci sei andato su quel sentiero?
Nel tag note non ci vanno le notizie storiche, neanche se fossero autentiche; si usa per inserire delle note destinate ai mappatori (in inglese, le note in italiano vanno col tag "note:it")

Ci sono alcuni motivi per cui non ho mai inserito su OSM questo "sentiero", e sono gli stessi per cui ho rifiutato di inserirlo nel catasto regionale:
1) Non esiste. Questo significa che non esiste neanche una pietra spostata a fare scalino o cose che evidenzino la presenza un percorso. Senza contare l'assurdità di creare un percorso di nessuna importanza agricola e tantomeno strategica/militare.
2) Non è segnato (per fortuna)
3) È all'interno del SIC del Monte Lera area a protezione totale e sarebbe preferibile evitare di passarci, anche a piedi.
adriespo (2019-10-15 16:04:53+00:00): Ho messo l'appropriato valore MTB che è praticamente portaggio su gran parte del percorso.

Certo che ci sono andato, ho fatto la traccia GPS personalmente.

"Il sentiero non esiste" non la capisco come affermazione. Se intendi dire che non è bollato, ci sono rari bolli sbiaditissimi. E ci sono una manciata di ometti. Se intendi dire che non è mantenuto, concordo, non se ne occupa più nessuno da decenni. Ma la traversata della dorsale Lera era fatta almeno fino al 1950. Una delle punte ha una targa del 1946. Un'altra ha una edicola. Naturalmente la difficoltà è alpinistica.

Non è all'interno della riserva se non per un tratto, che non è obbligatorio percorrere perché si può salire ad esempio della colle chiamato Bassa. Almeno a guardare i confini della riserva su OSM.

Sempre riguardo il Lera e la sua discordanza di localizzazione le fonti sono da una parte IGM, che la mette su una cima che NON ha la targa Monte L'era. La targa è apposto sulla cima che ho chiamato ovest (datata 1946!), e che è inoltre raggiungibile con un sentiero "direttissimo" aperto nel 2006. Domenica ne ho fatto un pezzo, ma  non sono arrivato in cima perché ero partito da troppo lontano. Vedrò in futuro.

La Pro loco, interpellata da un contributore di Gulliver, ha dichiarato che il Lera è quello da me chiamato ovest e fino a qualche decennio fa c'era una croce visibile dal paese.

A complicare le cose c'è da dire che poco più a ovest ancora v'è una cima senza nome che è ancora poco più alta.

Aggiungo che il catasto regionale censisce una frazione dei sentieri esistenti e che personalmente ne ho fatti decine e decine che non  erano minimamente catalogati. Non si può fare escursionismo basandosi su quel catasto, è più che altro una lista turistica.

Comunque ho fst
Jrachi (2019-10-15 17:17:27+00:00): La carta IGM è quella che fa fede in queste cose. Una cima non deve necessariamente essere la quota più alta, ma quella decisa dal cartografo che dovrebbe avere ragione, essendo il primo che ha messo il nome su una carta.
Essendo una lunga cresta in salita si potrebbero mappare 20 o 30 cime!
I sentieri sono messi a catasto secondo una procedura che, tra l'altro, richiede che il percorso sia almeno minimamente frequentato e frequentabile.
Gulliver non è una fonte attendibile, sopratutto su cime e antecime! (parere mio, scusa)
Una targa posta nel 1946 dagli scout di Torino è una prova? O sono andati a cercare una cimetta un pochino più in alto?
La Cima del Monte Lera "ufficiale" è quella a quota 1371 e trovo inutile andare a battezzare Ovest, Est, antecima nord-est o che altro. Che senso ha?
E poi stiamo parlando di una dorsale rocciosa. Che diamine! Fosse la cresta di confine dove su una cresta rocciosa gli alpinisti hanno dato un nome ad ogni punta raggiungibile (questo non prenderlo come polemica sugli alpinisti di due secoli fa!)
Aggiungo un'ultima osservazione sulla tua risposta. Il catasto regionale non "censisce una frazione dei sentieri esistenti" perché non è il suo scopo.
Jrachi (2019-10-15 17:20:57+00:00): Esiste un limite ai caratteri da inserire in questi commenti?
Mi informo.
Comunque ribadisco che il catasto dei percorsi escursionistici della regione Piemonte non è una lista turistica.
Personalmente evito di inserire su OSM tracciati che non siano sicuri (visibili e percorribili). Ma il bello di OSM è che ognuno sembra libero di fare quello che preferisce.
BCNorwich (2019-09-16 07:39:42+00:00): Hello, Please see my comment on your Changeset: 74474068 
You continue to make lots of mistakes with your mapping. Now you have placed a footpath to go over several rail lines and this path is also on top of a tunnel (Way: PROW 127_26 (724802270).

A lot of the paths you add are duplicates of existing ways. If a path needs amending please amend the existing way not draw a new way to duplicate it.

PROW 127_26 is not a path name it is a reference number.

Your Colchester Orbital West A route is not mapped as a route, a route should be mapped as a relation. In adding Way: Colchester Orbital West A route (724706845) you have actually in places triplicated a highway, (three ways in the same position.

There are so many mistakes that I think you should stop editing for now and correct your mistakes. It might actually be best to revert all you many incorrect changes.

Regards Bernard.

PS  If you need help please just ask.
rowena2611 (2019-09-16 08:39:49+00:00): Hi Bernard, thanks for your response. I certainly will work through all mistakes. But to let you know the reasons (even if incorrect), I added new paths as PROW because I tried to separate exiting paths and could do so in many places (disconnect or cut wasn't allowed, that would have enabled me to identify one part of an existing path as this PROW another as a different PROW. Or I was told there were multiple paths in a place, but the shift function described to move between them consistently directed to only one). I think if you sent me a previous comment it must have gone to spam as this is the first I have seen. Im not ignoring them, if you have. I want to learn, need to learn. I've watched the video, am using youtube also and help pages. Ive looked for help on several things unsuccessfully (eg detaching a line that has become attached to a hidden feature). Im sure it's there, but not straightforward to get answers. Whereas the help video begins with the advice to be bold, get out there and make changes. I have improved lines in lots of places also, based on my local knowledge. Some of the polygons have been so badly drawn. 
In ref to your note about path names in particular, I didnt find a naming protocol, and these footpaths dont have any other name. Hence use of PROW. None of the paths I looked at had this info attached, and where I could adjust the path itself I did. Could you direct me to naming protocols? 
With regard to mapping the Orbital as a route, I really wanted to do this but again couldn't find a type  that described it? That's easy enough to change or guidance on routes as opposed to paths.
Anyway thanks for your help and advice. You'll be pleased to hear that I am nearly done with desired changes in Myland region for now so can concentrate on corrections going forwards
Silva1989 (2019-09-16 10:08:25+00:00): Hi pwhite119,
I guess leisure=sports_centre is more appropriate if applied to the grounds of Veterans Memorial Field, with all the leisure=pitch and building= within it. Have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre
viloan (2019-09-15 23:48:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
freeExec (2019-09-18 06:45:18+00:00): Это могила при церкви. Тут нет никакой церкви, поэтому точно не подходит.

Надо выбирать теги не по "одному слову" в редакторе, а читать статьи в вики, описывающие теги.
akuz93 (2019-09-18 12:37:14+00:00): Какой именно тег вы бы посоветовали использовать?
freeExec (2019-09-18 12:50:07+00:00): Для одиночной могилы нету тегов.
akuz93 (2019-09-18 12:52:37+00:00): Так это не одиночная могила, это большое кладбище. Просто у него границы точно не известны.
freeExec (2019-09-18 13:35:11+00:00): Если это было кладбище, то зря стал менять, было отмечено верно. Если переживаешь из-за точных границ - отметь точкой.
akuz93 (2019-09-18 13:56:40+00:00): А как?
Я понял, как сделать полигон "кладбище" или точку "захоронение при церкви". Но, когда я ставлю точку и ищу в списке типов "кладбище", то ничего не нахожу. :- (
freeExec (2019-09-18 14:17:42+00:00): А, редактор считает, как и вики впрочем, что такой объект не следует отмечать точкой.

Но всегда можно в редакторе внизу раскрыть панельку с тегами, что ставятся на линию, и вручную их скопировать на точку.
akuz93 (2019-09-18 15:30:47+00:00): Сделал!
Заодно немного разобрался с тегами и вики.
freeExec (2019-09-18 15:48:05+00:00): Вот и отлично.
kartonage (2019-09-18 05:20:34+00:00): Hej PEAL1993,

Kleiner Tipp für die Bearbeitung mit dem iD-Editor: bei ausgewähltem Objekt kannst du das Objekt mit 's' rechteckig machen. Hilfreich bei Gebäuden, da diese ja meist doch rechteckig sind.

Die von dir erfassten Gebäude sind alle schief, krumm und überlappen sich zum Teil. Das sorgt für einen hohen Überarbeitungsaufwand für nachfolgende User.

Wenn du Lust hast dich noch mehr in OSM einzubinden, kann ich dir folgendes Tutorial (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/file:Osm-tutorial.pdf) ans Herz legen. Ein Blick ins Wiki schadet auch nie (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite) und hilft einem schnell auf die Sprünge bestimmte Dinge passend einzutragen.

Schöne Grüße
Warin61 (2019-09-16 05:24:28+00:00): Hi,

For cliff lines the NSW Base Map is quite good. Certainly better than what you can 'see' with imagery. 

Questions
How did you determine the height of the cliffs? It is not something I'd tag here are the height varies considerably. 
Are you local? Reason why I ask is one of your sources is GPS.
mario7436 (2019-09-16 07:00:47+00:00): I have walked the area often with GPS. 
Cliffs height vary continuously due to the nature of the terrain. Move 10m in either direction and the height is likely to change. Height above sea level or vertical drop? Many cliffs are not exactly vertical either. The real world is a messy place
I try to make a good estimate of the max height of the cliff and stop drawing cliffs when they are so low they see to be  threat or no all that steep. 
Here is source data for the sections. 
1. Cape St George Historic Lighthouse is 67 m abover sea level. It drops pretty much straight in to the sea. I estimated the cliffs here at 50 m. 
https://lighthouses.org.au/nsw/cape-st-george-lighthouse/
2. Headland north of Steamer's Beach has a peak about 130m above sea level, but the cliffs are low at about max 100m. There is a magnificent view from Steamer's Beach. Cliff height estimate with a DEM – Digital Elevation Model  - LDIR data I think.
mario7436 (2019-09-16 07:08:41+00:00): For 2. LPI NSW basemap has value of peak 139m and cliff height above sea level 100m. Same as previously.
Warin61 (2019-09-16 08:52:56+00:00): Height above sea level is 'ele' in OSM terms. 

The height key is from top to bottom of the object. If that varies lots then I'd leave it off or just do the significant bits. You can break the cliff up into connected segments and then just put the height on the bit that has it. Will anyone use the data?
Hjart (2019-09-16 11:08:40+00:00): Bemærk at når du tilføjer natural=bay på et område vil øerne i området, medmindre du gør dem til "inner"s, på nogle kort blive usynlige
Hjart (2019-09-16 11:11:15+00:00): I f.eks. Horsens Fjord (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1451065) er det korrekt lavet.
osmviborg (2019-09-16 14:51:20+00:00): Bla. derfor er det fejldisponeret at tegne fjorde og vige som områder. Den slags vandområder bør markeres med en node.
Hjart (2019-09-16 16:27:03+00:00): Jeg forstår ikke helt det argument. Når man angiver inners virker de jo fint.
archie (2019-09-17 23:20:10+00:00): Grunden till att jag tillade natural=bay var endast att jag ville åstadkomma samma tagguppsättning som i mp Skagerrak. Jag tänkte inte på effekten avseende öarna (av vilka det ju som bekant inte finns några i Sakgerrak). Vilket alternativ föredrar ni, inners (Anholt, Läsö, Hesselö) eller bort med natural=bay?
archie (2019-09-18 16:07:24+00:00): Hur gør vi? 1) væk med natural=by eller 2) komplettera relationen med inners?
CurlingMan13 (2023-08-27 06:42:19+00:00): Fields that have a tag such as soccer field, should not have a descriptive name, such as "Soccer".  I have removed the names within this changeset.
canfe (2020-06-19 07:41:54+00:00): Cresta Rocciosa (6797729338, v1)
non può essere una località, non sarà piuttosto un
natural=cliff
??
4004 (2020-01-24 09:49:01+00:00): она точно 2ая? а где тогда первая?
Allison P (2019-10-18 20:55:28+00:00): Is this really a park? As far as I know this area is just grass, and I don't believe it has a name.
PerplexingPenguins (2019-10-18 23:01:26+00:00): Maybe not, I wasn't sure exactly how to tag it
Allison P (2019-10-18 23:23:55+00:00): I would use landuse=grass since there's no evidence the area is a park.
PerplexingPenguins (2019-10-20 15:45:04+00:00): From what I can tell, this was at least formerly part of John Booth Memorial Park. The city website appears not to acknowledge the Royal Boulevard extension on its park map
mavl (2019-09-16 15:36:15+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника были взяты адресные данные?
iWowik (2019-11-23 16:13:13+00:00): Здравствуйте, flashers_ons!
К сожалению вы не ответили на комментарий к этому пакету правок.
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о комментарии, поэтому повторю вопрос, который меня тоже интересует
Откуда вы берете адресную информацию?
Kovoschiz (2019-09-16 06:32:38+00:00): Are you sure?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74509788
user_5359 (2019-09-16 04:00:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the key highway from the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52436591/history? If it is completely locked for everyone, we set an access=no or only for cars a motor_vehicle=no. I have restored the old value for security reasons.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-09-16 03:18:29+00:00): Hi Iliketurtles and welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

Parks on OSM are defined in a specific way, and that doesn't typically include residential blocks or houses. You can read more on the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park?uselang=en

It looks like you might have been mapping for Pokemon GO here. Please remember to be considerate of other mappers. This includes adding only real features to the map.

Fake features waste everyone's time as people have take the time out to clean them up. OSM is used for many purposes outside of games, so it's important to keep the map reliable and accurate.
Supaplex (2020-01-02 16:14:00+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-19 20:57:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74695383 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in USA, following doubts about sources.  See http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6409285 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3171
Baloo Uriza (2019-11-08 17:07:41+00:00): highway=service is better for driveways than highway=residential.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74510522
Baloo Uriza (2019-11-08 17:08:08+00:00): Please also consider using meaningful changeset summaries.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74510522
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-19 20:57:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74695383 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in USA, following doubts about sources.  See http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6409285 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3171