piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-07-10 10:44:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123352719
Emilius123 (2022-07-08 10:43:03+00:00): maps.me moment
highflyer74 (2022-07-08 10:45:09+00:00): Yeah, one of those... ;-)
Dave Venables (2022-07-08 14:54:04+00:00): https://www.derbybrewing.co.uk/blog/2022/7/7/lucky-number-seven
With works due to start imminently including plans to soften the look and feel of the venue and maximise the riverside courtyard to the rear, with plans to open in August.
Frans S (2022-07-10 13:20:53+00:00): Hello. I am a Validator and have commented on a few changesets. In general, all my comments are also valid on your other changesets. Please improve your mapping skills by reviewing the beginner course and the documents I showed you on my other changeset comment before continuing mapping.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123353212
ivanbranco (2022-07-11 20:16:50+00:00): Hi Pavol!

wikidata=https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oratorio_de_Santa_Mar%C3%ADa_Reina_y_Madre

the correct syntax is:
wikipedia=es:Oratorio de Santa María Reina y Madre

I fixed it :) good mapping!
4004 (2022-07-18 01:09:18+00:00): вам больше подойдет https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenGeofiction
Frans S (2022-07-10 14:08:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular buildings, not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123353377
MarcoR (2022-08-11 13:29:34+00:00): Ciao!

Puoi controllare il numero di telefono di Inter Market (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8933235305)? credo che il prefisso 0184 vada tolto in quanto già presente 353 (che dovrebbe indicare un numero di cellulare).

Grazie e scusa per il disturbo,
Marco.
Botaler (2022-08-11 14:18:41+00:00): Hai ragione, ho provveduto a fare la correzione. Ero intervenuto a correggere gli orari di apertura e non avevo notato l'errore sul numero di telefono. Grazie a te, mi hai fatto diminuire un errore su Osmose!
Botaler
MarcoR (2022-08-11 18:00:49+00:00): Ottimo :)

Buon mapping,
Marco
*Martin* (2022-10-06 13:29:39+00:00): Ahoj Mapperue. Do tagu name sa dava vlastne meno objektu, nie vseobecne. Nazov "Obecny urad" je vlastne meno, preto tam nepatri, a to, ze je to obecny urad, je uz vyjadrene tafom amenity=townhall.
mapperue (2022-10-06 14:02:20+00:00): Adresu uvádza úrad v tvare "Obecný úrad Poproč".
https://www.poproc.sk/-kontakty
parsd51 (2022-07-08 11:11:54+00:00): Hej

Tak for rettelsen :-)

Jeg tror oneway -1 forvirrer en del mappere så jeg har rettet den så den er yes

Ensretningen er ændret mellem Amtsvejen og Jernbanegade:
https://halsnaes.dk/kommunen/nyheder/ensretning-i-noerregade-bliver-vendt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/563890246
Så mellem Sydhavnsvej og Jernbanegade er ensretningen stadig syd til nord.
Eller ved du om det er ændret? I så fald ret det endelig.

Er det to bollards med access
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9874079546
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9874079547

motor_vehicle no ?
foot yes ?
bicycle yes ?

Hilsen
parsd51
andershl (2022-07-08 12:02:37+00:00): Jeg har lige været der nede for at se efter hvordan det er..
andershl (2022-07-08 12:09:13+00:00): I øvrigt mener jeg, at bollard pr. default blokerer korrekt (for biler) ref https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
parsd51 (2022-07-11 14:26:33+00:00): Tak for input med de faktiske forhold
Frans S (2022-07-10 14:06:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123353593
Frans S (2022-07-10 14:04:46+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular buildings, not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123353673
Frans S (2022-07-10 14:02:19+00:00): Hello. See my comments on other changesets.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123353888
Frans S (2022-07-10 14:01:40+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key and do not connect nodes to other objects.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123353897
Frans S (2022-07-10 13:14:12+00:00): See my comments on another changeset .
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123354615
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-09 08:55:05+00:00): Looks good!  pssstt - you made the right decision to add it yourself - we're often slow as volunteers.

If you would like to get more involved in this open source project, I encourage you to try the app called StreetComplete.
Frans S (2022-07-10 13:02:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).

B: Overlapping buildings drawn.

C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.

D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.

E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123355657
Frans S (2022-07-10 13:03:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).

B: Overlapping buildings drawn.

C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.

D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.

E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123355657
Frans S (2022-07-10 13:14:36+00:00): See my comments on another changeset
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-07-09 15:19:16+00:00): Hi Vsevolod,

Unless I'm mistaken, I don't think there is a hospital in the middle of the sea near null island, so I've token it out.

Also: by writing a changeset message, you can give a hint on what you are trying to do. This helps other mappers to get your intentions and to correct possible mistakes.

Kind regards,
Pieter
Frans S (2022-07-09 10:36:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention to following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123356039
JochenOSM (2022-07-09 13:42:55+00:00): Hi, ich habe jetzt zwar nicht nachgesehen was da wie markiert ist. Aber way 30479627 (Stück Radweg) war ein Versehen oder?
wermak (2022-07-09 20:40:24+00:00): ref wieder entfernt, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123413468
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-07-09 15:21:24+00:00): Hi,

I did delete your 'park' in the middle of the sea, as I don't think there is one there.

Keep in mind that everyone sees your edits, don't use OSM.org to keep track of personal favourites.

Kind regards,
Pieter
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-11 17:41:15+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123403999
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-11 17:42:07+00:00): Thanks for reverting @ Pieter Vander Vennet !
alexashh (2022-07-09 16:20:44+00:00): Пожалуйста, объясните что вы хотели исправить в этой правке?
DaveF (2022-07-18 13:36:50+00:00): Hi
Are these actually canals?
Would the be better tagged as drains or ditches?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain
amosharper (2022-07-18 15:11:41+00:00): Hi Dave - this was the most appropriate tag set I could find, but I'd be happy to change them if there's something more appropriate. They're not for irrigation, so waterway=drain doesn't fit - they're man-made water channels specifically for the fishery. Maybe keep the current tags but add leisure=fishing?
amosharper (2022-07-19 09:52:42+00:00): From a little more reading, since these trenches don't have water flow, it's perhaps better to redraw them as polygons (despite their narrow width) and then use natural=pond and leisure=fishing.
DaveF (2022-07-19 20:23:10+00:00): The 'modern' schema for all inland water features is now natural=water & water=river/canal/lake/pond etc.

On the actual water polygons, I'd use:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fishing

If this site is specificity for fishing, You may want to draw a large polygon around the site and tag that with leisure=fishing along with a name & any other relevant tags such as fee, opening times etc.
DaveF (2022-07-19 20:23:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfishing
amosharper (2022-07-20 10:37:23+00:00): Thanks. I'll redraw as polygons. I don't have sufficient knowledge of the angling centre to outline the whole area accurately, and my interest in mapping these bodies of water is navigational rather than local business. A future contributor may wish to update the centre itself, but in the meantime this should leave the map (a) accurate and (b) in better stead than before the ponds were added.
amosharper (2022-07-20 10:42:11+00:00): For reference: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123844948
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:26:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:27:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Jeinzi (2022-07-08 11:27:49+00:00): See note 3242411
Roani52 (2022-08-26 15:37:22+00:00): Deze rotonde is inmiddels opgeleverd en in gebruik
John Kastner (2022-07-12 13:36:24+00:00): Hello, welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your detailed contributions around Fort Totten metro station.

As part of you contribution, you've added a number of bus shelters tagged with "name=Bus Shelter". The "name" tag in OpenStreetMap is not intended to be used in this descriptive manner. That these objects are bus shelters is already adequately captured by the tagging "amentiy=shelter" and "shelter_type=public_transport". You should ideally go back and remove the "name" tag from the objects.
KostyaZAyAc (2022-07-08 11:42:14+00:00): #mapbox_contribute
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123358915
eggie (2022-07-08 13:15:25+00:00): Hi Kostya

You are sure this is the place were the events will take place?
It looks like a familyhouse and is perhaps the office of the organisation. (office=company)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Devents_venue
Description
Used to identify places which provide facilities for events such as banquets, weddings, etc. Edit or translate this description.

So I don't think this is a correct attribution. 

Greetz,
eggie
KostyaZAyAc (2022-07-08 14:51:16+00:00): Hi Eggie. Thank you for your good remark, the mistakenly added tag has been corrected, you can check it out here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123369593
Thank you for your feedback, it is very important to us!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123358915
Famlam (2022-07-26 20:04:20+00:00): Hoi evl, 

Misschien goed om te weten dat zulke gebouwaanpassingen verloren gaan wanneer er een BAG-update in de omgeving plaatsvindt. Mocht het fout in de BAG (basisadministratie gebouwen) staan, zou ik aanraden dat daar door te geven. Zogauw de BAG goed is, wordt dit vanzelf of na een verzoek op het forum bijgewerkt.
canfe (2022-07-09 08:53:28+00:00): Non associare indirizzi nemmeno ad aree, mettere tutti i dati su l cancello di ingresso.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123359353
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-09 08:50:23+00:00): close.  But the restriction should all be "private", not "no" for some.  I've gone ahead and corrected it.
dieterdreist (2023-02-12 18:49:23+00:00): Buonasera Ascanio12,

mi sono guardato queste modifiche e ti vorrei dire che le tracce gpx spesso non sono molto precisi e non si possono implementare 1:1 così come sono. In particolare nel punto visibile qui https://ibb.co/dQXw33f hai introdotto tanti nodi che non sembrano reali (la tua modifica è verde, rosso è come era prima). Ti invito ad usare anche la heatmap di Strava che spesso mostra bene le posizioni e forme dei sentieri. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava

Puoi confrontare queste modifiche qui: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123360543

Saluti e buona mappatura,
Martin
Mashin (2022-07-09 07:07:20+00:00): You're doing an amazing job, thanks!
evo_evz (2022-11-16 14:02:48+00:00): Hey where did you get the info and name for Way: Venetia Street Reserve (1076837375)?

I had a look down there today and there is no signage and it's fenced off. You can walk half way down there if you want to bush bash a little but this is not what I would call a reserve that you could go and visit if you know what I mean?

Many thanks
radiotrefoil (2022-11-17 13:27:09+00:00): Hi it's from DCS POIs dataset. You can see it on the base map and topographic layers.
evo_evz (2022-11-17 19:10:31+00:00): How do I view it? Thanks heaps
radiotrefoil (2022-11-20 08:35:46+00:00): in the online editor, press B to open the background settings panel and choose the ones starting with NSW DCS
evo_evz (2022-12-12 15:38:06+00:00): Yeah I see. How do we find the date of those maps?
evo_evz (2022-12-12 15:44:21+00:00): Don't worry I got it. 2018 both. It's not there now. Should I delete the name and maybe re tag as natural=wood?
radiotrefoil (2022-12-13 07:32:39+00:00): I think keep the name, but yeah feel free to retag it as natural=wood
evo_evz (2022-12-13 09:53:33+00:00): Keep the name even though it's not signposted, fenced and difficult to access?
radiotrefoil (2022-12-13 10:47:05+00:00): yeah, just add source:name=DCS. It's still the official name of the reserve even if it's inaccessible and not marked on the ground.
Mathias_ADAV (2024-04-15 08:15:20+00:00): Bonjour,
je viens de voir votre modification du chemin de la Deule, que vous avez fait passé en highway = cycleway au lieu de path.

C'est c'est une voie verte avec une cohabitation piéton et cycliste, répertorié avec path + bicycle = designated et foot = designated

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Voies_vertes

Bon mapping !
Mathias
impiaaa (2022-07-09 18:01:43+00:00): In changeset 123408943, I restored the wikidata tag you deleted. Please don't delete tags that are still accurate.
skyper (2022-07-11 13:09:56+00:00): Hallo PT-53
Es wäre nett gewesen, wenn Du mich persönlich gefragt oder zumindest zu der Diskussion im Forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75939) eingeladen hättest. Auch hättest Du ja wenigsten ein paar Tage auf Reaktionen warten können und nicht sofort mit dem Löschen beginnen müssen.
Ich sehe keine Grund warum Sperrflächen mit entsprechender Breite nicht mit `both_ways` erfasst werden können. Sobald sie z.B. für landw. Verkehr freigeben sind ist es ja sogar nötig. Hast Du mir eine Alternative an den Straßenlinien?
Warum hast Du eigentlich `lanes:backward/forward=1` auch gelöscht? Die Tags waren doch nicht falsch.

Wenn ich es richtig verstehe, hast Du ein Problem damit, dass der Wert von `lanes=*` nicht mit die Summe von `lanes:*=*` übereinstimmt. Ist das denn eine Regel? Hätte es dann nicht gereicht den Wert von `lanes=*` anzupassen?
So wie ich die Diskussion um `lanes=*` im Bezug zum Spurtagging in Errinnerung habe, sollte aus Kompatibitätsgründen dieser Tag möglichtst nur die "echten" Spuren darstellen, damit auswertende Software ohne Spurtaggingunterstützung damit noch was anfangen kann. Dies gilt aber nicht für `lanes:*=*`.
Ich tendiere daher eher dazu, dass die Summe der `lanes:*=*` größergleich des Wertes von `lanes=*` und eben nicht zwingend gleich seien sollte.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
PT-53 (2022-07-11 13:45:00+00:00): Hallo skyper,
hast Du diesen CS-Kommentar übersehen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106364399

Gem. Wiki ist both_ways für 2-Fahrtrichtungsspuren gedacht. Von einer Verwendung für Sperrflächen steht da kein Wort oder habe ich etwas übersehen.

Kannst Du mir ein Beispiel zeigen, wo eine Sperrflächen für landw. Verkehr freigegeben ist?

`lanes:backward/forward ist unnötig. wenn lanes=* eine garade Zahl ist und beide Fahrtrichtungen die gleiche Anzahl an Fahrspuren haben.

lanes=* soll die Anzahl der Fahrspuren anzeigen und OSMOSE meckert, wenn die Anzahl der einzelnen Fahrspuren mit der Summe in lanes nicht übereinstimmt.

Ist die Verwendung von both_ways für Sperrflächen schon irgendwo anderst diskutiert worden und gab es da ein entspr. Ergebnis?

Nachdem die ersten beiden Antworten auf meine Anfrage im OSM-Forum eindeutig waren und an diesem Tag keine weiteren Meinungen kamen, habe ich mit der Bereinigung (nur) im Raum Riedlingen - Mengen begonnen. Das soll vorschnell gewesen sein?

Grüße
skyper (2022-07-11 16:34:26+00:00): Hi,
ja, sorry, die Kommentare habe ich übersehen. Sind wohl durch meinen Filter gerutscht. Nehme alle Vorwürfe zurück.

Naja, bei den ganzen `cycleway:both=no` schaden `lanes:*ward=` bei gleichmäßig verteilten Spuren wohl auch nicht und bei komplizierteren Fällen oder auch nur `turn:*ward=*` sind sie durchaus sinnvoll.

Nach Beispielen müsste ich erst suchen, habe in Natura aber duch aus schon Linksabiegespuren in beide Richtungen nur für landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr oder auch ÖPNV gesehen.

Das Wiki ist ja auch nur ein Wiki und eventuell fehlt dort einfach die Verwendung für Sperrflächen bzw. Sperrflächen generell im Wiki. Mit Diskussionen darüber kann ich aber auch nicht dienen.

OSMOSE ist auch nur eine von etlichen Angeboten der Fehleranalyse und diese müssen ja auch nicht immer Recht haben.

`*:both_ways` ist noch nicht so verbreitet und auch das Spurtagging i.A. hat sich wohl noch nicht überall durchgesetzt (jedenfalls nicht in diesem Detail). Daher wird nicht jede Person eine Meinung haben und die, die sich damit beschäftigt haben, werden wohl auch nicht alle Zeit haben innerhalb von wenigen Tagen zu antworten. Daher wäre aus meiner Sicht etwas Geduld von 1-2 Wochen angebracht gewesen, allein wegen der Beispiele in den Daten. So hast Du leider Fakten geschaffen, bevor die Diskussion überhaupt wirklich begonnen hat.

Einen guten Start in die Woche,
Grüße skyper
PT-53 (2022-07-11 16:51:35+00:00): Viele Ausreden und keine Fakten!
Warten wir mal auf die weitere Beiträge zur von mir angestoßene  Diskussion.
Du hast ja selbst keine Diskussion vorab angeregt.
PT-53 (2022-07-11 16:52:32+00:00): PS:
Bitte trag doch Deine Sicht der Dinge im OSM-Forum vor.