piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-01-12 17:16:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:16:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-10 17:52:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of water=sound? Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water .
manoharuss (2017-01-11 05:55:49+00:00): Hi Visit MS Gulf Coast,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. As user_5359 specified in the above comment, waterbody in the sea with a sound tag does not seem plausible. I have deleted this feature object. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features this woud be good reading to understand the kind of features that could be mapped. It is always a safe bet to read the wiki for the tag you wish to use for acceptable key values as well. Happy mapping.

Best,

Manohar
mavl (2017-01-12 17:29:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:28:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:26:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:03:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:30:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-01-10 17:49:12+00:00): Proszę poprawić tagowanie dróg (trzeba zdjąć tag construction=).
Perimex (2017-01-10 22:42:48+00:00): Spoko pamiętam
mavl (2017-01-12 17:17:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:24:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:33:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:01:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:08:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:27:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
maraf24 (2017-01-10 20:17:53+00:00): Hej:)
Możesz mi napisać, w jakim celu dodajesz punkty boiska na już istniejących boiskach?
Wygląda to wszystko jak duplikaty, nie widzę dla tego zastosowania.
Bart_0099 (2017-01-10 20:20:00+00:00): ponieważ potrzebowałem sciagnac plik z punktami boisk do stworzenia mapy, nie wiem jak przekonwertowac linie na punkt w kopi lokalnej wiec dodalem punkty i je pobralem. ;-)
maraf24 (2017-01-10 21:11:57+00:00): Ale w takiej sytuacji nie musiałeś tych punktów oznaczać tak jak w osm, mogłeś tam sobie dać własny tag, np. 
"boisko_do_importu=tak". Nikomu by to nie przeszkadzało:)

Jeśli wystarczyłyby Ci współrzedne jakiekogolwiek rogu boiska. to mogłeś je uzyskać overpassem:
[out:csv(::type, ::id, ::lat, ::lon)]
[bbox:{{bbox}}];
way[leisure=pitch];
foreach(
  node(w);
  out 1;
);
maraf24 (2017-01-10 21:21:43+00:00): Jak się okazuje, można też pobrać punkt centralny:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/laZ
Bart_0099 (2017-01-11 01:38:08+00:00): Wprowadziłem te punkty bo porostu nie było ich wiec wybrałem sobie ogólną nazwę, wiec duplikatu punktów nie robiłem. Owszem z tagiem masz rację, punkt centralny nie wchodzi w grę. Jeśli bardzo przeszkadzają to mogę je usnąc
maraf24 (2017-01-11 09:29:13+00:00): Jako duplikaty dobrze by było je kiedyś usunąć.
Adam_Piszczek (2017-01-17 14:05:29+00:00): poprawiłem poprzez usunięcie
mavl (2017-01-12 17:14:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:19:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Hjart (2017-01-10 19:47:01+00:00): When you add websites please include the scheme (http etc). See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website
bubix (2017-01-11 15:31:39+00:00): Ciao Luc76,
mi sono permesso di fare un revert della tua modifica in quanto devo verificare se il tratto da viale dei Mussi a Via Pianfei prende il nome della prima o della seconda via. Appena possibile andrò a verificare personalmente i civici 34B e 34 che hai inserito. Grazie per gli aggiornamenti che esegui su San Giacomo!
Bubix
luc76 (2017-01-12 14:05:32+00:00): Bubix, ho cambiato il nome della via perché è almeno dal 1990 che quel tratto di strada è nominato viale Pianfei, sotto il numero civico 34 (e mi sembra anche sotto il numero 34B) c'è anche scritto. Giusto per conoscerci: non cambio le informazioni se non ne ho la certezza, non è conveniente per nessuno. Sono felice che anche tu frequenti Sangiacomo.
bubix (2017-01-13 07:29:09+00:00): Si, scusa hai ragione. Il tutto nasce dal fatto che il tratto di strada era unico dalla discesa della chiesa verso il campo sportivo e lì ero certo che era Via dei Mussi. Comunque per rimediare agli errori avevo scritto delle note di aggiornamento in quanto avevo dubbi. Comunque hai ragione tu nel dubbio meglio lasciare stare anche se in Osm è tutto rimediabile. Nel mio aggiornare la mappa mi piacerebbe come regalo a tutta la comunità lasciare qualcosa di tangibile (passeggiata, map party, ecc) magari attraverso la Pro Loco o gli esercenti. Ci possiamo ragionare? cosa ne pensi?

Bubix
bubix (2017-01-13 07:33:05+00:00): Ho aggiornato tutto guarda se è ok. Grazie mille!
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:36:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Polarbear (2017-01-10 23:48:16+00:00): What does 'invented' mean here? Does the bridge exist, and you estimated the outline to the best of your knowledge; or is the bridge fictive for testing purposes?

If the former, fine, just tune your changeset description. If the latter, please don't add fictive test features to the database.
messpert (2017-01-11 14:19:09+00:00): This rather provocative comment was my protest against being *forced* to use a man_made bridge outline when I have already mapped this bridge properly.

This is what I regard as a major bug in standard rendering for abandoned railways. A bridge is still a bridge and should be rendered as such, irrespective of whether it was originally built to carry what is now an abandoned railway.

This problem has been brought up on the tagging list many times in the last few years, but all attempts to get the standard renders to do the right thing have failed.

The "official" way to render these bridges is to "invent" a bridge outline which I regard (in such cases) as tagging for the renderer.

As my source tags say, I know this bridge well, I have many gps traces around it, and several of my own photographs.

I cannot take gps traces on the bridge itself since it is fenced off, and anyway the gps quality is not great because of heavy tree cover, but I have made a reasonable estimate of the width and position from all my ground surveys, photographs and gps.

This edit was prompted after my discussions on the tagging list. See
this thread: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-January/030788.html
and also
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-January/030812.html
and particularly my post here
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-January/030819.html where I am complaining that I am being "forced" to invent by the tagging scheme.

See especially 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-January/030843.html
where Martin Koppenhoefer repeats that this use of man_made=bridge is the right solution.

There is a photograph linked in to 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-January/030847.html
which shows this bridge from a few years ago.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-12 16:33:50+00:00): I'm sure that there are other map styles that render significant features such as abandoned railways; https://github.com/SomeoneElseOSM/openstreetmap-carto-AJT is one, but there are presumably more.
messpert (2017-01-13 12:50:44+00:00): Andy, if you look at the last paragraph of 

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2017-January/030819.html

you will see that I was trying to advocate OSM to local councillors who could not be expected to do other than look at the "standard map", at least initially.

To anyone who knows the area, the omission of these significant features is ridiculous. A bridge is a bridge is a bridge
regardless of its original purpose. These bridges have been mapped for years, and I think were once rendered before a decision to ignore anything associated with abandoned railways was taken.

I know that was an easy option for the renderer, but it was just plain wrong. The bridge_outline is useful in in its own right, of course, but here is is just used a kludge.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-13 14:01:34+00:00): I'd certainly agree that it would make sense to render abandoned railways such as this one that are still major features on the ground on any map that tries to represent what's visible locally.

I'm not sure about "local councillors ... could not be expected to do other than look at the "standard map" though - OSM really isn't in the rendering business, and the "standard" map, if it's for anyone, is for mappers.  I certainly rarely use it.
The people who are in the rendering business (the MapBoxes and Thunderforests of this world) surely have better alternatives.
Polarbear (2017-01-13 17:57:46+00:00): It were not the bridges that had been mapped for years, it were the abandoned rail tracks that are carrying the bridge attribute. 

man_made=bridge is for mapping bridges. It was introduced to OSM (later than the bridge=yes attribute) exactly to solve your problem (among others).
messpert (2017-01-13 19:00:10+00:00): Well, I know this is the party line. But it doesn't seem to apply on ordinary roads, for example. And if it is to supercede the bridge tag, then why can it not be applied to ways? Trying to micro map every bridge depends on having very high quality gps or perhaps imagery.

I have a pretty good gps unit, but I would need many traces and a lot of averaging to get a reasonable outline of a typical bridge. That is also a burden on mappers who in most case just have a single gps trace across a bridge. And in many cases won't even have access to the bridge sides.

I will have to live with this, I suppose, but the rendering it is just plain broken as of now.
Polarbear (2017-01-13 21:02:00+00:00): There is no superseding. bridge=yes is still required on the way across the bridge. 
man_made=bridge is supposed to map the outline, so by definition it is an area. 
It is the fate of an OSM mapper that the job is sometimes easy and sometimes very hard. 
Please distinguish a correct database from plenty of possible rendering styles, as @SomeoneElse already explained.
messpert (2017-01-14 15:56:05+00:00): We are going around in circles here. It is precisely because I want an accurate correct database, that I made the provocative comment.

I am very well aware of the distinction between the database and myriad of renderers.

I only disagree a little with @SomeoneElse  in that newbies first interaction with OSM is going to be the standard rendering on the main page, and that should not omit properly tagged major features impacting on roads like the bridges in this case.

The decison not to render abandoned railways was a little odd from a UK perspective, but reasonable. But for the renderer to fail to extract the bridges from those ways is a incorrect shortcut IMHO. Andy's renderer presumably does it properly.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-14 20:31:55+00:00): Mine looks like http://88.99.83.189/maps/map8/map7d.html#zoom=16&lat=50.46714&lon=-4.47496 FWIW.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:38:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:19:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:35:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
literan (2017-01-10 18:11:15+00:00): не надо портить номера телефонов: правильный формат +7 495 3804808
mavl (2017-01-12 17:17:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
BertBKoeln (2017-01-10 21:00:05+00:00): Hallo surveyor54, danke Dir, denn ich wollte mich gerade dran machen meinen Fehler von vor 3 Tagen zu beheben... Sorry, das war mir versehentlich passsiert...
mavl (2017-01-12 17:01:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:19:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:38:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:29:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:05:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:28:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:27:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:28:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:22:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:02:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
edvac (2017-03-19 17:56:28+00:00): In this changeset you have used data from the Institut National de la Statistique du Niger (http://www.stat-niger.org/statistique/).
Have you discused this data import with the local community (OSM-NE) and the overall OSM community, and follow the Import Guidelines?
Otherwise, this changeset should be reverted.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:21:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:32:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:27:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].