piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_14633126 (2022-05-30 17:02:04+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich werde das künftig berücksichtigen. Lg
Polarbear (2023-01-24 23:14:40+00:00): Hi MorbZ,
die Tegeler Str ist keine Einbahnstraße. 
Das mag aufgrund einer Baustelle in 2022 so gewesen sein, dann wäre es aber gut das ranzuschreiben und zu beobachten. 

Viele Grüsse
MorbZ (2023-01-24 23:21:18+00:00): Das Teilstück war sehr lange eine Baustelle, ist erst seit Kurzem wieder offen, danke fürs Ändern.
ququruzka (2022-06-01 07:16:28+00:00): Вітаємо !

В OSM UA запропонована і діюча схема нанесення вулиць - name=* МАЄ співпадати з name:uk=* 

Виправтє, будь ласка
user_6110846 (2022-06-03 11:43:03+00:00): шо саме 

мені                     
                 повилазило в очах я не бачу
highflyer74 (2022-05-16 16:36:28+00:00): Moin!

Das Paulaner's gibt es schon lange und meines Wissens nach weiter rechts an der Ecke.

Sei so nett, nicht einfach neue POIs anzulegen, wo bereits welche sind (in diesem Fall das Camarillo) und achte darauf, immer aktuelle Daten in OsmAnd zu haben und auch Deine Position genau zu überprüfen.

Könntest Du uns kurz sagen, ob das Paulaner's hierher umgezogen ist? Danke!
highflyer74 (2022-05-16 16:40:26+00:00): Ich hab' das Paulaner's eben mal angerufen, und die sind seit 30 Jahren an der gleichen Stelle, deshalb bitte nicht böse sein, wenn ich den von dir hinzugefügten Node wieder entferne. Schönen Abend!
wtrdrnkr (2022-05-18 17:32:44+00:00): You are right. Thanks for the correction.
ConnorWong (2022-05-17 14:56:55+00:00): Hey HiauSirg,

it would be great to have smaller changeset windows since this is way too large for debug tools!
zluuzki (2022-05-18 04:47:15+00:00): This is small enough.
mapmaker1559 (2022-05-19 03:36:17+00:00): Hey there Joseph, I'm not sure if you missed my reply to your comment on my changeset, but the reason it's inappropriate to mark Brookside Parkway and Vint Hill Parkway as secondary is because they are not intended to route through-traffic, given they have very low speed limits.  Rouges Road, which I upgraded to secondary, is the main through-route connecting Dumfries Road to Vint Hill Road, given it is a more direct route and has a higher speed limit.  Brookside Parkway and Vint Hill Parkway are intended only for traffic destined for Brookside or Vint Hill.  For these reasons, they are better marked as tertiary.  Thank you.
Joseph R P (2022-05-21 15:46:07+00:00): Sorry for the late reply, I was not receiving any notifications for changeset comments. The reason I favor Riley, Brookside, and Vint Hill over Rogues is because the former provides direct connection to the population center and important amenities and buildings whereas Rogues Road bypasses it and probably isn't that important to through traffic anyway because traffic travelling between Warrenton and Linton Hall is more likely to avoid the Vint Hill area by following US 29 to VA 215 or SR 619.

The closest pair of roads in the area that I know of to compare these to are Cardinal Drive and Dale Boulevard in Dale City. Cardinal Drive is a newer, faster, and smoother route but Dale Boulevard provides the most connection.
Silver Queen (2022-05-16 18:28:55+00:00): accurate location
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-16 16:40:24+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121061149
mapper999 (2022-05-16 21:35:32+00:00): Hallo,
ein Teil dieser Baustelle (nördlich des Klosterwegs) ist bereits fertig gestellt und wieder freigegeben. Bitte beachte auch, dass einige Nutzer von OSM ihre Daten nur monatlich oder seltener aktualisieren, daher sollten solche kurzen Sperrungen besser nicht als highway=construction eingetragen werden.
mueschel (2022-05-18 12:14:51+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here. You added 24 nodes with a huge number of foreign tags that don't seem to belong in OSM. Could you check that?
Gianfranco2014 (2022-05-18 15:08:36+00:00): Si, sto verificando con il gruppo CAI del veneto, da inserire un po meno tag e poi li correggerò. I tag per le grotte, non ci sono sulla wiki, per cui ci saranno comunque tag non standard.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-19 05:38:59+00:00): Not a building
snoozingnewt (2022-05-17 20:07:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted because it has deleted valid data.
emersonveenstra (2022-05-16 17:46:04+00:00): Hi,

There was already a tag for Schuler on the building, so I've merged the two (also note it's Schuler Books, not Schulers Books)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121062548
treestryder (2022-05-17 03:33:24+00:00): Thanks. Good catch, on both accounts.

In Vespucci, I did download a large enough area to catch that the entire building had been labeled as Schuler. And having been a customer of theirs since their start, I should know better than to make them plural.

By the way, I do not believe that Schuler occupies that entire building footprint. The southern end has several other tenants. I am presently uploading the Mapillary imagery that I captured, during my visit today. Maybe it could be used to find the extent of the Schuler and add the other tenants.
Human65536 (2022-05-16 17:26:07+00:00): Mass edit to remove redundant suffixes from citybike station names.

Some reasoning for "new" format:
*follows "official" station names
*follows "Map what's on the ground"-practice
*follows format of similar tags (e.g. bus stops).

To help search engines, 'citybike station' is still mentioned in alt_names. 

Originally suggested by HSL. Related discussion: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=72745
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-16 17:28:14+00:00): 121045117 121042348 121042213 120870945 120870555 120869420 120868701 120868026 120867544 120867294 120867164 120866573 120866130 120865345 120847231 120846843 120846552 120846076 120845537 120844922 120842902 120842352 120842076 120841604 120841136 120840955 120839863 120839481 120839156 120837735 120837097 120836180 120833693 120832536 120831725 120830949 120830709 120829289 120827786 120826108 120826063 120823265
eggie (2022-05-19 15:44:27+00:00): Dag JeTe.. Je vraagt feedback... 
Tja.. fietspad... Denk beter highway=path taggen met surface=paved en foot=yes en bicycle=yes. Maak ook een verbinding met de hoofdrijbaan. De verbindingsnode ontbreekt nog.
Op de verbindingsnodes van het fietspad en de hoofdrijbaan zet je highway=crossing crossing_ref=zebra
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing_ref%3Dzebra

Die tagging wordt het meest toegepast op de nodes en niet op het lijnelement.
Mapse
eggie
eggie (2022-05-20 08:59:09+00:00): De oversteek heb ik aangepast naar Zebra. Gebint heb ik omgetagd naar Vuursteen  conform de BGT en BAG.
Verbinding gemaakt met hoofdrijbaan. 

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2022-05-19 10:15:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Please use the recommended Imagery. You map from an outdated Bing Imagery, Many buildings are disapeared. (flooded ?)
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121063077
MxxCon (2022-05-16 19:11:44+00:00): It's best to put node closer to the main entrance to the business so that navigation can direct you exactly where to go.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121063089
Patr1k_P (2022-05-17 21:23:50+00:00): Chýba tam ešte podoplnat "place" inak ako robíš to číslovanie, to odpisuješ podľa zbgis? Ak ťa baví dopĺňať čísla, dá sa to aj jednoduchšie
EdoBoo (2022-05-16 21:18:23+00:00): Ottimo lavoro, erano davvero disegnati male
snoozingnewt (2022-05-17 20:07:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted because it has deleted valid data.
literan (2022-05-17 19:55:39+00:00): милти это вроде ж не фастфуд, эту еду же не будешь есть прямо там или на ходу. Надо принести, разогреть...
короче, я их как convenience обозначаю
ynx (2022-05-17 21:01:46+00:00): Вроде там можно и на месте разгореть, а в некоторых даже есть место где съесть. Я сам долго сомневался как их обозначать, но вроде в Москве они именно как fast_food отмечены, не все, но большинство. Но fast_food, мне тоже не нравится, так что пусть будет магазин.
literan (2022-05-18 09:10:36+00:00): не хватает тега для кулинарии, конечно
riiga (2022-05-17 06:59:51+00:00): Hi and thanks for the edit!

I would suggest using `office=it` instead, it's more accurate, though there's nothing wrong with the generic `office=company`.

The building type is however wrong now that is no longer is a clinic, it should be `building=office` (or the generic `building=commercial`.
Roman Oleynik (2022-05-25 20:53:38+00:00): Hi! I see you have made the correction. I appreciate this, thanks!
Best regards,
Roman
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121063795
MxxCon (2022-05-16 19:13:12+00:00): Thank you for adding this. I missed it when I redrew other areas nearby. 👍
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121063880
Andrea Musuruane (2022-05-17 10:18:57+00:00): The changesets 120967638, 120984298, 121005103, 121010288 and 121064038 have been reverted in changeset 121091806.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121064038
Mannivu (2022-05-17 10:21:39+00:00): Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121064038
jleedev (2022-05-16 19:15:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Msiipola (2022-05-17 07:17:11+00:00): Den här stigen har blivit ändrad många gånger. Egenskaper för namn, yta och bredd, har lagts till och sedan tagits bort.
Varför det? Var de fel?
Msiipola (2022-05-17 07:20:44+00:00): "name" ska alltid vara ett namn. Tidigare hade stigen namnet "Mot läsarstenen" vilket inte är ett namn.  

Om man behöver lägga till någon annan typ av info, bör det anges med "description":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
Svisse (2022-05-30 18:49:06+00:00): Anledning till alla ändringar var att när man zoomade ut lite så såg man inte stigen ut man var tvungen att zoom in väldigt nära så jag kollade runt lite hur andra hade gjort sina stigar...
Msiipola (2022-05-17 07:13:09+00:00): Den här stigen skapades av dig, du lade till bredd och ytskikt (ground), men sedan radera du dessa. 

Ingen stor sak, men jag blev nyfiken på varför du tog bort dem.
Frans S (2022-05-19 10:26:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Important! Use the prescribed Imagery (Maxar Premium). You mapped from an old Bing imagery. Many buildings have been disappeared due to flooding.
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121064427
DressyPear4 (2022-05-17 21:35:17+00:00): Olá, essa edição foi revertida, basicamente você importou dados que ficaram sobrapostos aos existentes, tente apenas adicionar o que está em falta ou corrigir o que está errado.
Também verifique se a licença dos dados é compatível com a do osm.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121064511
Gracianne (2022-05-17 21:51:10+00:00): Obrigada, sem problemas.  Entendi o que aconteceu, foi falha minha no JOSM onde enviei junto com as edições a camada já existente. Refiz minha contribuição somente com as adições. =)
eserte (2022-05-17 17:52:57+00:00): Hallo! Nach meiner letzten Sichtung vom Februar 2022 gibt es in der Bernauer Straße an dieser Stelle <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126095383> keine Benutzungspflicht für Radfahrer, demnach wäre bicycle=use_sidepath falsch.
user_5359 (2022-05-19 06:49:37+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8256048468. What is the meaning of the tag csonk = csonk (310)?
kogutowicz-mano (2022-05-19 07:23:01+00:00): I seems to be a copy&paste bug. Thanks for the head up.
ashs_as (2022-05-17 08:41:15+00:00): Hello Fousseny Koïta;
Please be aware that you added a new highway track and moved a node far away by mistake, which led to a street crossing in many countries.
I fixed this issue.
link for the street.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1060660954/history
Link for osmcha
https://osmcha.org/changesets/121064856/
Regards
ashs_as
kapazao (2022-09-13 13:57:24+00:00): Hola, el uso que has hecho de la etiqueta name:ca (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name:ca) no es correcto.
¿Podrías explicar lo que tratabas de poner ahí?
En caso de añadir nombre al elemento esto se debe hacer en la etiqueta name y no se deben usar etiquetas de idioma específico sin establecer name.
Un saludo
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-25 17:39:27+00:00): Is info from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9323340272 applying to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120071180 ?
MxxCon (2022-05-16 19:16:09+00:00): Are those actually benches or some of that "hostile architecture" that city/mta likes to put over subway grates to prevent homeless from sleeping on them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121065992
yoasif (2022-05-16 19:32:58+00:00): hostile architecture
yoasif (2022-05-16 19:34:53+00:00): see https://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/19/new-subway-grates-add-aesthetics-to-flood-protection/
yoasif (2022-05-16 19:36:56+00:00): not entirely sure how hostile  they are, they aren't anything like the ones *inside* the subways. they seem to have an anti-flooding reason for existing, at least.
BCNorwich (2022-05-18 07:19:26+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Please have regard to the warnings given to uploads. There are several warnings listed above.

Please don't delete and redraw objects that need correcting/amending. OSM practice is, when possible like here, to update/amend the existing object, Thus keeping all history of the object intact in the OSM database. No history is lost. I've reinstated the original objects. 

Names in OSM should be the formal verifiable names. Descriptions like 'big house' and 'what is this' are not names and ought be removed. Tags like note=??? and description=??? are valid tags for this sort of thing.

A car park in school grounds is not a residential area nor would it be named 'car park'.

Lime Kiln Close wouldn't be a oneway road, otherwise, how would traffic get out? Also duplicated sections and drives tagged residential and name with lower case initial letters. Removed, and reinstated the original line.

I've made several amendments to suit OSM practice. There's a lot to learn in OSM mapping.

Best Regards Bernard.
aseidel (2022-05-17 15:16:00+00:00): Bitte bei Knoten 9746254969 nochmal checken: ist das kein 357-50? Danke!
Régis Vrignaud (2022-06-29 05:42:29+00:00): Bonjour, les batiments rajoutés derrière la cité les Chênes d'Or , n'existent plus, la zone est en construction. 
Cordialement
MxxCon (2022-05-17 00:18:04+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on this edit? Satellite imagery doesn't seem to show that there's a residential road here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121066624
jchin1 (2022-05-17 01:02:49+00:00): Sure, the road has just been completed a few months ago, but you can see a more up to date picture here: https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7816432,-73.778565,3a,75y,220.63h,86.39t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1schWGflnwEoHTSds_jCcdog!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

Happy to provide an updated photo if that helps.
MxxCon (2022-05-17 01:08:51+00:00): Please note that you can't use Google Maps to get information for OSM. Please see this article https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
jchin1 (2022-05-17 01:21:49+00:00): Got it, since the satellite imagery isn't updated yet, would you recommend a particular verification option (e.g., GPX track)?
MxxCon (2022-05-17 06:22:24+00:00): How were you able to get that data? What was the source of it?
jchin1 (2022-05-17 12:55:11+00:00): I'm thinking of recording it myself (using OsmAnd) and can also add street level imagery using Mapillary. Let me know if that will work, thanks for your help!
MxxCon (2022-05-17 23:43:45+00:00): If you want to add mapillary imagery, sure. Hopefully it'll be useful to them and they'll process it to extract useful data.

So is the construction on all those houses complete and the road is open to public traffic?
hatul (2022-05-23 08:22:03+00:00): תודה על התוספת אבל למה להשתמש ביחסים ולא רק בקווים? אלה גבולות פשוטים.
OrDal (2022-05-23 19:13:49+00:00): היי.

the renderer of the osm standart layer
משום מה לא מציג את הגבולות האלה כאשר התגיות הן על הקו.
מציג רק כאשר התגיות מופיעות ביחס.

אני מודע לכך שמדובר ב-
mapping for the renderer
שהוא לא תקין מבחינת החוקים אבל רציתי לוודא שאין בעיות אחרות שבגינן לא מוצגות הגבולות (כמו למשל יותר מדי נקודות סמוכות או קו שחוצה את עצמו).
berndw (2022-05-17 17:14:38+00:00): Jetzt ist das Durcheinander perfekt, 
Dieser Weg ist bestimmt laut Historie hw=unclassified.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338749633#map=17/49.43496/10.98401&layers=N
DD1GJ (2022-05-17 21:17:27+00:00): Dieses amtliche Chaos ist bereits einen Monat alt und wurde im verursachenden Changeset  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119715722 angesprochen.
Für Mittwoch ist bereits ein Telefontermin mit dem Mapper vereinbart.
SimonPoole (2022-05-17 06:13:00+00:00): Hi, you seem to have added "lots" of data on top of the existing data in these changesets. Was this import discussed in any form with the community before? It is definitely technically defective.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-17 07:17:56+00:00): Example of broken data: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14147872

Also, what is the license of data you imported?

Are you aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines ?
woodpeck (2022-05-17 07:36:37+00:00): This is broken in so many ways. I will remove all of it.
Mashin (2022-05-17 08:10:05+00:00): @woodpeck Please don't. Let's wait until a response. If the license is compatible, then geodz can have a chance to fix the data and tags (and create an import wiki page).
SimonPoole (2022-05-17 09:26:13+00:00): @Mashin while I can understand your sentiment, there is so much wrong with the import that it will be less work, including for the importer to redo it properly if it is even desired. In particular the overlapping data makes no sense at all to try and clean up "manually".
woodpeck (2022-05-17 11:22:16+00:00): Yes, we have "unclear license", "undiscussed import", "no conflation", "lots of useless GIS tags" all rolled into one - the faster this is gone the better. Even if the importer were to fix the problems manually, it would take them weeks - and we expect that the problems be fixed BEFORE upload not after.
Mashin (2022-05-17 12:26:31+00:00): I agree, it was really a bad idea to dump all that data into OSM unannounced. Though IMO if they have permission from the data owner at hand it seems like a less stress on the database to fix the overlaps and tags than to import-delete-reimport million nodes.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-17 13:52:24+00:00): >  less stress on the database

This is an utterly irrelevant issue that does not matter at all here.
Lejun (2022-05-17 08:05:08+00:00): Bonjour, de quoi est-il question dans ce groupe de modification ? Je ne vois que l’ajout d’un morceau d’autoroute (highway=motorway) entre l’allée des vanneaux et le trottoir…
SomeoneElse (2022-05-16 20:16:51+00:00): "by a lazy mapper"?
You're not really doing yourself any favours here, are you?
theMETAVERSr (2022-05-16 20:20:09+00:00): sorry, but you should see the harassment I am getting because I am filling in missing info as basic as state and city. Why should I still be nice about it? no one on your end cares to...

sorry I'll keep trying to be nicer. I hope y'all can do the same.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-16 20:28:43+00:00): (on the state and city thing) it's actually less critical (though not wrong) than you might think to add things like addr:state, because OSM is a geographical database, and it's usually possible to determine "things that are inside other things".  See for example https://nominatim.osm.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N&osmid=5619990934&class=shop , and for Ridgewood, https://nominatim.osm.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=W&osmid=325933623&class=place .
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-17 10:28:15+00:00): The river is not residential. reverted
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121068137
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-17 10:27:16+00:00): tertiary is wrong class
CycleStreets (2022-05-16 21:21:25+00:00): OK, pedestrian connectivity added in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121070404
datsteves (2022-12-31 16:08:55+00:00): Ich finde leider keine infos darüber das an den Stellen auch die Hausnummern wären wenn dort gebaut werden würde (auch wenns logisch sinn macht das es so ist).
In den Bebauungsplänen der Gemeinde ist höchstens das Grundstück wo Polderweg 54 wäre, überhaupt als Grundstück vermerkt.
siehe dieses Dokument von 1988
https://gemeinde.langeoog.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Bebauungsplan-C-Gartenstra%D1%81e-Polderweg.pdf

neue Bebauungspläne für die Umgebung wie zb.
https://gemeinde.langeoog.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/5.-%C3%84nderung-C.pdf
zeigen kein weiteres Grundstück mehr an der Ecke.

Hab das aber mal irgendwann auch mal gehört das an den Stellen gebaut werden sollte bzw. das als Bauland verkauft wird. Nur irgendwie wurde da nie draus was.
Deswegen halt die Frage ob es irgendwo ne Quelle gibt das dort die Grundstück so auch sind.
Glassman (2022-05-19 21:33:05+00:00): #TIP: Instead of removing building, redraw the outline to save the building address.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121068375
Lejun (2022-05-17 09:10:29+00:00): Merci de bien vouloir demander au corps enseignant de prendre contact avec moi dans les plus brefs délais.
olo81 (2022-06-03 18:31:51+00:00): nazwa opisowa do poprawy
JeroenHoek (2022-05-17 06:55:58+00:00): Ik waardeer je inzet, maar hier rek je de grenzen van de vliegbasis te ver op. Je neemt het grondbezit in plaats van de afrastering en effectieve grens. Je pakt daar ook wegen mee die in publiek gebruik zijn. Ik heb de basis in de afgelopen jaren met hulp van andere mappers vrij nauwkeurig ingetekend. Neem even contact op als je iets specifieks mist hier.

Ik heb de wijzigingen vanwege de omvang van de changeset zo snel mogelijk terug gezet om conflicten in de data te voorkomen. Voel je daar niet door aangevallen.
JeroenHoek (2022-05-17 06:59:33+00:00): En: als je zo'n groot object aanpast, behoud dan de historie van het object! Je gooide hier van de way waarop alle tags stonden de tags weg, en maakte een nieuwe aan. Daarmee kun je niet meer de wijzigingsgeschiedenis van de vliegbasistags zien.