piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:44:20+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria. 
You hardly squared the rectangular buildings you have mapped.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:42:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92975558
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:42:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92975699
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:42:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92975880
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:13:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92976141
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:42:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92976332
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:27:07+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:41:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92976542
!bm (2020-10-24 12:15:21+00:00): Hallo udjat,

willkommen zu OSM! 

Beachte bitte, dass "Google" keine gute (bzw gut definierte) Quelle für OSM ist, da vor allem für GoogleMaps und GoogleStreetView die Lizenzrechte fehlen, um daraus gewonnene Daten in OSM zu übertragen. Solche Changesets müssten dann zurückgesetzt werden.

Da zu dem Wohnheim ein Garten gehört, habe ich es nun an der Flurstückgrenze getaggt (wie wir es auch bei Schulen, Kitas etc machen, so es die zur Verfügung stehenden Daten erlauben) und weiter verbessert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92986203

--besteGrüße!bm
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:13:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92976751
AkuAnakTimur (2020-10-24 02:30:42+00:00): *well, except if roads under construction appear ready to traffic, then it's A-OK
mavl (2020-10-24 15:29:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не удаляйте существующие дороги.  
Для названий улиц и адресов есть соглашение.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
ff5722 (2020-10-27 18:50:40+00:00): Note that you accidentally marked a road as motorway, I have corrected it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863204638
Natfoot (2020-10-24 03:20:26+00:00): Sorry I am a bit punchy tonight I don't mean any bad intent more tong in cheek as I am used to adding back abandoned railroads.
Natfoot (2020-10-24 03:21:00+00:00): Sorry I am a bit punchy tonight I don't mean any bad intent more tong in cheek as I am used to adding back abandoned railroads.
Himy_473_GEOG281 (2020-10-24 03:36:19+00:00): Bayshore Terrace*
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:34:08+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:35:04+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Matija Nalis (2020-10-24 05:22:04+00:00): highway=cycleway je za biciklisticke staze (odvojene od ceste), a highway=secondary+cycleway:left=lane je za biciklisticke trake (na cesti). v. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
naomap (2021-03-11 22:26:28+00:00): Bonjour.
J'ai restauré le tag route=hiking sur ce circuit de randonnée pédestre ainsi que sur les autres que tu as passés en circuits de VTT – tout en laissant network=lwn qui signifie Local Walking Network. 
Je tente de mettre la valeur multiple route=hiking;mtb sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5649090, mais je suis pas sûr que ce soit pris en compte par des outils comme waymarkedtrails.org. Il semble que la pratique soit de créer un circuit par type d'activité.
Cordialement,
Antoine.
MatthieuF44 (2021-03-12 05:49:35+00:00): Bonjour,

Oui j'ai modifié en MTB pour deux raisons :
- l'affichage sur des sites comme waymarkedtrails des circuits vtt.
- pour moi un circuit est avant tout pour des vtt car un circuit vtt est praticable à pied et l'inverse n'est pas forcément possible.

Cordialement.
naomap (2021-03-12 07:53:16+00:00): Bonjour.

Ces raisons ne me semblent pas valables : la première s'appelle "mapper pour le rendu", la seconde correspond à ta vision qui n'est pas forcément celle de tout le monde. 

Mais la bonne nouvelle c'est que si on indique route=hiking;mtb waymarkedtrails intègre le circuit aux deux pratiques sportives, comme tu peux le voir pour le Circuit des Chênes et d'Arthon à la Sicaudais, à Chaumes-en-Retz. 
Je te laisse modifier les autres circuits.

Cordialement.
Nearby0051 (2022-07-03 12:18:54+00:00): Sicher dass hier ein Edeka ist?
Auf dem Luftbild erkenne ich nur ein Feld
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:13:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

btw. The buildings you have mapped is not visable on MAXAR

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92980558
KPull (2020-10-24 08:58:27+00:00): Nice to see these roads being updated so quickly on OSM. Just a couple of questions regarding ways https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27449581 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863244201, please, if you don't mind:

The ways are marked with access=no. Is this intended? Also, they contain a tag highway_1=traffic_signals. I believe traffic signals are typically marked as nodes on the way itself.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92980845
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:35:27+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Mannivu (2020-10-24 08:21:37+00:00): source: Regione Lombardia, IODL 2.0 (http://www.geoportale.regione.lombardia.it/metadati?p_p_id=PublishedMetadata_WAR_geoportalemetadataportlet&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=maximized&p_p_mode=view&_PublishedMetadata_WAR_geoportalemetadataportlet_view=editPublishedMetadata&_PublishedMetadata_WAR_geoportalemetadataportlet_uuid=%7B2857AFB6-DF90-4B30-BA9B-7E694DCB4D08%7D&_PublishedMetadata_WAR_geoportalemetadataportlet_editType=view&_PublishedMetadata_WAR_geoportalemetadataportlet_fromAsset=true&rid=local)
Jose Riha (2020-10-26 20:38:27+00:00): ahoj, prosim Ta nepouzivaj tag ofmozaika, ale Ortofotomozaika SR, vid https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/KMyJYfoKaM4/m/Okn7fvryCAAJ

dakujem, j
kiaraSh-Q (2020-12-16 08:32:21+00:00): سلام، شما در این چنجست اقدام به حذف تگ "مسیر یکطرفه" خیابن شریعتی در شهر کرمان نموده اید که این کار مشکلات جدی در مسیریابی در این شهر بوجود آورده است. لطفاً بدون داشتن علم نسبت به وضعیت حقیقی یک مکان اقدام به حذف یا تغییر تگهای آن مکان نکنید که این کار میتواند مشکلات زیادی برای شهروندان ایجاد کند. ممنون از اینکه توجه میفرمایید.
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:09:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92981478
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:11:18+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.
Your mappings are not accurate enough and not squared.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92981478
BCNorwich (2020-10-28 09:06:41+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your new path has been drawn on top of an existing path, thus making duplication of ways. Amendments should be made to the existing way, this will keep all of the history. If you need help removing the duplication and making amendments please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-11-02 09:01:44+00:00): Sorted.
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:39:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92981665
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:41:08+00:00): The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.
Not a single rectangular is proper squared.
Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92981665
Johnny Mapperseed (2020-10-24 08:47:56+00:00): * With bing sat imagery as a reference
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:36:05+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92981963
abakus_uploader (2020-10-24 22:30:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
TreeTracks (2022-08-11 04:31:10+00:00): Hi Cleary, I wonder if you could check the paved surface tag on this way , and the adjoining ways to the north, from Fords Bridge to Ella Vale. It's tagged as paved but all the imagery I have available indicates its unpaved from the outskirts of Fords Bridge north. I think you added the surface tag but it may have been carried over from someone else's earlier edits perhaps. Thanks for your help. Best wishes Ian
cleary (2022-08-11 06:53:55+00:00): Ian, I think you are correct. I remember driving the full length of the Dowling Track and parts of some roads adjoining it. The roads were paved for a few hundred metres right at the main intersection where the hotel is located in Fords Bridge but otherwise I think most were unpaved. A few sections of road had been sealed where creeks or floodplains crossed but most of the roads were unpaved. I think satellite imagery should be clear enough so please go ahead and make whatever corrections you think fit. Thanks for asking and thanks for correcting it.
TreeTracks (2022-08-11 23:28:36+00:00): Hi again, thanks for your quick reply. I'll fix it up his morning. Best wishes.
Warin61 (2023-02-12 06:19:47+00:00): Hi,
Bing shows water in Green Creek, where as in the DCS Imagery it looks bone dry. As it flows into a 'creek' then it cannot be a river? The problem is assign it as either a river or a stream ... after rain .. during flooding it would be a lake :) I'd stick with the name 'Creek' to suggest what the locals thought of it?
cleary (2023-02-12 07:43:43+00:00): 
Hi Warin

I don't think that the name necessarily limits how a waterway is mapped. Cooper Creek (aka Coopers Creek) near Windorah and King Creek near Bedourie in Queensland are better-known examples - definitely rivers despite their names. 

Also a river is not precluded from flowing into a stream.  The Bulloo River near Tibooburra and the Lachlan River past Oxley in NSW both flow into swamps not into larger waterways (although the Lachlan water seeps into the Murrumbidgee through the swamp). In much of the Riverina district, west of Wagga Wagga, water from the Murrumbidgee River flows out into streams, not the other way around. 

OSM Wiki states waterway=stream "for small waterways that can be jumped across by a fit adult". It appears to me that, for most of its course, Green Creek could not be jumped by a fit adult although one could walk across when the riverbed is dry. 

I had added an explanation in the note tag for the Green Creek relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11788613) : "although not named a 'river', the width of this waterway (for much of its course) satisfies OSM criterion to be tagged as a river". I would still say that is the case. If I have misunderstood the OSM tagging for waterways, then this should be corrected. However it remains my understanding that OSM tagging is based on the width of the waterway. Like many waterways in Australia, the flow of water in Green Creek is intermittent but, since it is a wide waterway when it flows, then I would say waterway=river and intermittent=yes.
syntex (2020-10-27 09:31:42+00:00): This edit is wrong, you can't edit political borders the way you want them to be. The road near Eyvazlu goes through the Azerbaijan territory and you just cant adjust the border as you wish !!
SomeoneElse (2020-10-28 13:51:13+00:00): Actually, the change that dragged the border is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92897644 (by the same user) I think, not this one.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-28 14:37:57+00:00): Previously, the border was dragged the other way by a different user in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83403866 .  All three alignments (original, drag to the west and drag to the east) are different.  I've asked each of the people who changed it what their reasoning was.
Arun Madhavan (2020-10-25 01:47:04+00:00): Hi Manu, thank you for showing interest in mapping. You have taken a lot of effort to map buildings. I feel your effort can be more meaningful if you map few but specific buildings. If you have question as to what you may map let me know.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92982639
Manu George (2020-10-25 09:03:17+00:00): Thank's for your appreciation. Let me know in specific which building's i need to look more into.