piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MrSebek (2017-10-10 16:12:29+00:00): Zrobiłeś to 1 klasa. Postaram się dorównać Twojemu poziomowi przy kolejnych poprawkach.
archie (2017-09-25 22:18:55+00:00): Det räcker inte med att bara lägga in name- och description-taggen.
nyuriks (2017-09-27 23:24:41+00:00): Hi, please add wikidata tags when adding wikipedia. JOSM can do it automatically using "Fetch IDs" in Wikipedia plugin.  Also, please help with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Link_Improvement_Project if you can. Thanks!
Marco_T (2017-09-28 11:18:48+00:00): Hi nyuriks, thanks for the useful informations. I'll do it surely in the future!
muralito (2017-09-26 00:05:46+00:00): Hola. ¿Podes confirmar si en esas calles entra un auto o no?
muralito (2017-09-26 00:07:46+00:00): Por la foto parece bastante angosto. Capaz mejor marcarlo como highway=service
sabiusli (2017-09-26 01:07:41+00:00): Hola, es mucho mas angosto que Cno Petirossi y sería bueno que se notara la diferencia, es cierto y es de tierra, es fundamentalmente peatonal pero se entra bien con auto hasta el final del mismo, yo mismo lo hago porque tengo un paciente en el último solar del 4376.
sabiusli (2017-09-26 01:09:04+00:00): En si yo no edité el tipo de camino, solo le cambié el nombre y corregí la ubicación del número 4378 y agregué el 4376
muralito (2017-09-26 13:58:27+00:00): Bien. La pregunta no era por si las cambiaste o no, sino por si habría que cambiarlas o no.

Igual como terminan ahi, no se usarian como intermedio para ninguna ruta.

le puse sidewalk=no para marcar que no hay veredas y lanes=1 por la unica senda.

¿Como haces para dar vuelta el auto?
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-27 13:58:55+00:00): Hello Iowa Kid. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125949612 you have tagged `destination:sterrt` instead of `destination:street`, right? #typo
Supaplex (2017-09-26 02:00:20+00:00): Building tag刪掉，那是整棟
wille (2018-06-18 11:32:19+00:00): testing comment
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/52369286
wille (2021-02-03 21:10:33+00:00): another test
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/52369286
wille (2021-10-28 10:19:28+00:00): testing 2
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/52369286
fkv (2017-09-28 15:14:35+00:00): Merging ref=* into name=* and copying a misspelling from Wikipedia to OSM are both very bad ideas. Example: v75 of relation 941197. The common name is "Höllentalstraße", and that's what belongs into the name=* tag. The "B 27" is not part of the name, it's the ref=*, and we have a consensus in Austria to omit the space in the ref=*. The space in "Höllental Straße" is a spelling error (so-called Deppenleerzeichen) in the official name, so this should go into official_name=* at best. I am going to correct this one relation, but I guess that you changed many other road relations in the same way, so they need to be corrected as well. This might be a bigger task. I suggest a partial revert of your changeset, undoing at least all name changes.
nyuriks (2017-09-28 16:36:46+00:00): @fkv, I think you have made a mistake - v75 only adds wikidata ID. It does not change name or ref.  name was changed in v74 - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49087662
fkv (2017-09-28 19:53:16+00:00): Oh, you are right. Sorry for bothering you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-12 09:15:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1491075/history/21 - this edit seems to be blindly adding wrong id and causing problems for future automated processing

see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/bot-edit-proposal-fixing-wikipedia-tags-pointing-at-redirects-in-usa-where-it-can-be-done-reliably/101417/4

this bot edit was a big problem and caused significant damage to data across world

pity that it was not reverted in time
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-12 09:16:09+00:00): "auto-matching wikidata tags based on wikipedia tags. Per @talk discussion"

Can you link this discussion? I wonder whether this problem was missed or whether this claim is misleading and this mass edit was never actually approved

(yes, I know this edit is old - but I keep running in data damage caused by it)
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:33:13+00:00): Olá, JanserHK.
Nesta sua edição você criou 2 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
DaveF (2017-09-26 10:30:41+00:00): Hi Neil
Do you think these city based places for amendment? 
I'm struggling to see Aztec West as a village.
ndm (2017-09-27 17:54:13+00:00): Well, have relabelled the commercial area instead -- but it has a church, doctors, cafes, etc., etc. so village prob' wasn't too far off.
DaveF (2017-09-27 18:27:23+00:00): Sorry, I for got add the Overpass link:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/s1d 
+Cadbury Heath. Personally I think they should be suburbs, what do you think?
Carlos Brys (2017-09-26 21:48:48+00:00): Cambié de lugar el nodo de Aquaplast
Está en la avenida Blas Parera entre Tripoli y Derqui
SomeoneElse (2017-09-27 00:58:25+00:00): The wikipedia and wikidata entries on http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2127054 look like the apply to the whole route (as far as Santiago de Compostela) not just this section of it near Mulhouse.
nyuriks (2017-09-27 01:02:08+00:00): I agree, and this will be part of the overall cleanup as described at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Improvement_Tasks#Duplicate_tags_on_a_relation_and_its_members  - lets discuss it there on the talk page, because  discussions on changesets are harder to track and consolidate.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:19:36+00:00): Hello Yorvik Prestigitator. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5129715187 you have introduced the new key `post_box:style`. Did you mean `post_box:type=lamp` instead? Please have a look at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=post_box
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-09-29 01:19:35+00:00): oops! thanks for spotting this, fixed now
muralito (2017-09-28 04:06:59+00:00): Si la zona es de uso residencial no esta bien borrar lo mapeado, tenga o nombre, porque lo que se mapeo fue el uso del suelo.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 15:55:01+00:00): Hello rodriguez1rafael. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527693396 you have introduced the new key `Dirt Road`. What is it for? #newkey
woodpeck (2017-10-04 08:33:48+00:00): Dear user Ladamafria. You seem to be working with users PC10 and/or opengislab and perhaps others on some sort of project. Please have the project lead/coordinator contact the OSMF data working group at data@osmfoundation.org. We need to talk to you. You are uploading data in violation of the data import policies, and your expectation that the data you upload is not modified or edited by others is incompatible with the way OpenStreetMap works.
woodpeck_repair (2017-10-04 20:11:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52636453 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed and buggy import of waterways (bad tags, don't match imagery, intersect with existing geometries, etc.) that is claimed to have been extracted from SRTM
woodpeck_repair (2017-10-04 20:11:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52636453 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed and buggy import of waterways (bad tags, don't match imagery, intersect with existing geometries, etc.) that is claimed to have been extracted from SRTM
PC10 (2017-10-05 03:57:40+00:00): you do not know about remote sensing?
The srtm image for the zone is of year 2011, with that the drainage network was extracted.
Until just less than two months ago BING real color images have been created for the year 2016. You believe that the dynamics and uses of the soil do not change. ? Obviously they change, and it is very common to disappear rivers and streams. and therefore the importance of the project with the community.
PC10 (2017-10-05 03:51:04+00:00): Really? fuck off foundation OSM.
instead of helping and guiding how to improve the data (eliminating unnecessary nodes) revert the whole dataset. are you fucking kidding me?
of course, publishers do all the control, but companies like BING, ESRI, or google maps, when they have stolen thousands of osm data do not tell them anything. And the team of lawyers of the foundation OSM never respond the mails to address this subject. Of course, as they have business with these companies.
freebeer (2017-10-05 13:36:49+00:00): Thank you for your concern.
I have no connection whatsoever to OSM except as an eternal newbie contributor, but...
I saw attempts made to contact you in order to fix the problem data, as well as to cease uploading it until the problems were worked out before uploading.
I purely by chance found myself in the area of this import, and was shocked by the poor level of quality which has no place in OSM.  The data should not have been uploaded.
There is a procedure to be followed before carrying out an import, where the obvious problems are worked out before the data is uploaded, otherwise OSM gets polluted by this rubbish.  The cleanup should be done beforehand, not attempted after the bad data has been uploaded.
Please adopt a friendlier tone, accept that your data was sub-standard and in need of work which OSM will be happy to offer guidance and help (I do not have the messages handy to quote), and if you wish public feedback, make an appearance in the imports mailing list.
I am sure there are others who will have more to say, and I repeat, I am in no way connected with OSM than you are.
Just my opinions.
With that I will withdraw from further comment, ceding the floor to those wiser and more mature than meself.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:25:24+00:00): Hello Wild Willy. You have introduced the new key `service station`. Did you mean `shop=car_service` instead?
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/shop=car_service
Manoj Thapa (2023-07-10 10:51:17+00:00): Hello Umes ji, Thank you for contrubuting in OSM. I am confused and not clear about the artwork you have added in this area without its proper name. Is it real?
Supaplex (2017-10-02 12:10:22+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:29:35+00:00): Hello partytax. You have introduced the new key `taxation`. What is it for? #newkey
ff5722 (2017-10-01 15:25:36+00:00): @Harald
reverted it
taxation=theft
obviously vandalism
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 15:53:10+00:00): Hello Thibaut75011. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5129897982 you have tagged `contact:twit` instead of `contact:twitter`, right? And for twitter the username is enough. Please have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact #typo
tbo47 (2017-09-28 23:12:57+00:00): hi, thanks, I fixed it.
Arlas (2017-09-26 15:20:37+00:00): qualche utente della zona dovrebbe controllare edit come questo in cui vengono praticamente cancellati nodi e percorsi
Aufräumer (2017-09-29 17:11:55+00:00): This changeset left an invalid multipolygone. It tried to fix it.
stedewa (2017-09-30 06:23:52+00:00): Sorry and thanks!
pnorman (2017-10-01 23:08:52+00:00): Hello,

You've made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527727984 which overlaps with a footpath. Does the footpath need moving, or is the building wrong?
Rayhan Hossen (2017-10-04 06:00:28+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your message. I've already checked and solved this issue.
pnorman (2017-10-01 23:29:48+00:00): Is the stream direction for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527730240 right? As it goes along it gets smaller and smaller, I'd have thought it was flowing to the southwest.
LLAQWA (2017-09-26 12:52:20+00:00): Hola,
Ahorita tenemos algunas limites dobles. Puedes corregir los limites!
Tengo un favor: puedes utilizar el editor JOSM si tu arreglas fronteras - tiene una validación y mostra conflictos.
Saludos
berposen (2017-09-26 21:26:45+00:00): Ok, GRACIAS!
berposen (2017-09-26 21:28:07+00:00): This message appears:
Error de edición - asegúrese de que JOSM o Merkaartor están cargados y con la opción de control remoto activada
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:10:11+00:00): Hello 茂名沙琅. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/339568460 you have tagged `name en` (with space) instead of `name:en`, right? #typo
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-26 14:52:48+00:00): Hello samuelrussell. In this and other changesets you have tagged a lot of `tree-lined` instead of `tree_lined`, right? #typo
by the way, because i've seen this already today in other changesets: is there a problem with dash and/or underscore in Go Map!! 1.4 ?
freebeer (2017-09-26 18:06:45+00:00): Hallo Harald,
Totally unrelated to this changeset or Go Map, I do want to confirm that the underscore cannot be typed with the combination of Potlatch (Adobe Flash) and browser Opera, while under the same OS, Firefox works fine.  I doubt anyone else is likely to experience this, with the Firefox workaround, so I have not tried to guess where to point the blame.
End of my unrelated observation...
samuelrussell (2017-09-26 23:17:24+00:00): Pebkac. Manual tagging and I forgot it was underscore. Will fix in Josm at home
carciofo (2018-02-08 19:37:33+00:00): Hi, please make sure to add layer=-1 when to waterway tunnels or culverts. Also, meaningful changeset comments help other mappers get an idea about what changed, so please help us by adding some meaningful description about what was done in each of your changesets in the future. Thanks in advance.
TeresaPeteti (2017-09-26 06:17:13+00:00): Adding and modifying Turn restrictions in Phoenix using mapillary
Arlas (2017-09-26 06:49:21+00:00): non hai letto bene. Usare il tag sidewalk è solo un altro modo per mappare i marciapiedi. Leggiti bene la wiki che è stata fatta dalla community ed ascolta i pareri della community per poter far parte di questo progetto. Pensi che facendo 200 edits rimarranno le cose come vuoi? verranno tutti revertati e avrai solo perso tempo.
Arlas (2017-09-26 06:34:30+00:00): fermati perché stai sbagliando. Informati bene e leggi tutta la wiki non pagine neanche tradotte in italiano. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
Questo tuo atteggiamento in una community non è accettato ti avverto che tutte le tue modifiche verranno revertate e sei stato già segnalato al DWG
Piskvor (2017-09-26 09:18:16+00:00): Díky, úplně jsem to zapomněl upravit v mapě. Je ale lepší použít buď prefix, nebo construction=* - málokterý konzument dat kontroluje tag disused=yes . Ještě jsem to doupravil.
eggie (2017-09-26 07:53:04+00:00): shop = funeral_directors  

zou er nog bij kunnen.
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-09-29 06:40:50+00:00): Ciao,
start_date è utilizzato per indicare quando un'attività (o un monumento) sono nati. Guarda qui http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features , ora non ricordo se sono classificabili come gli orari.
user_2842609 (2017-09-27 21:17:01+00:00): Oui :)
Constable (2017-09-26 07:43:01+00:00): what does this changeset comment mean? looks to me like you only deleted useful footpaths from the map. This definitely not a good job.
Arlas (2017-09-26 15:00:15+00:00): he was blocked (4 days) by the DWG, I sent many mails to him and DWG about this. This will be reverted
Constable (2017-09-26 15:34:39+00:00): well done, thanks!
maraf24 (2017-10-24 09:54:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527754357
Dlaczego droga tylko dla koni?
SparkyCola (2019-02-03 16:00:20+00:00): Why did you tag 4P40 (473292081))  as private access? I cycled last summer and it always seemed like a public road to me. It is important because all routing services won't route through it
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:04:26+00:00): Hello Дмитрий Юрьевич Плотников. At the pressure of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5130198518 you have missed some `f` of `ire_hydrant:pressure`, right? #typo
eggie (2017-09-26 08:09:12+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-26 08:14:00+00:00): Het is echt niet de bedoeling om de landuse grass vast te plakken aan het wegennet. Dit maakt de kaart verder onwerkbaar voor anderen  .. ook verschuivingen zijn dan een ramp voor de kaart. Ik overweeg de changeset terug te draaien.
eggie (2017-09-26 08:20:28+00:00): reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52375878
eggie (2017-09-26 08:23:07+00:00): Waarschuwing per PB
4004 (2017-09-26 09:02:02+00:00): спасибо за ваш вклад в осм.
ваше добавление точки компании вопросов не вызывает, вот только почему то были затронуты другие точки, особенно точка остановки общ транспорта. Как правило, без хороших на то причин такие точки не изменяют.
спасибо
4004 (2017-09-26 09:06:12+00:00): вы, видимо, нечаянно сломали дорогу, когда переносили одну из точек. я либо откачу ваше изменение, либо попытаюсь исправить
eggie (2017-09-26 08:16:06+00:00): Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Ik zal de wijziging terug zetten. Je brengt schade toe aan de kaart. Het gebied is al aangemerkt als Leisure park.
eggie (2017-09-26 08:20:01+00:00): reverted
eggie (2017-09-26 08:22:00+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52376022
Dit was je changeset. Mocht je vragen hebben stel ze gerust. Leisure=park  is de functie die staat los van wat je ziet.. de landuse=grass, forest.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 15:06:59+00:00): Hello Claudius Henrichs. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/470629007 you have tagged `abaondoned:highway` instead of `abandoned:highway`, right? #typo
Claudius Henrichs (2017-12-31 11:57:30+00:00): Indeed. This was already fixed meanwhile. Thanks for checking.
4004 (2017-09-26 09:04:39+00:00): спасибо за ваш вклад в осм.
в случае со складом, ваша компания единственная, кто его арендует? Если так, то стоит совместить/перенести добавленные вами данные на здание, которое уже отрисовано.
См.: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_-_%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD_%D1%8D%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82_OSM
eggie (2017-09-26 08:36:45+00:00): Leisure=park is in de Nederlandse situatie geen landuse. Het is een transparant die over de landuse en water heen ligt. De bedoeling is dat je de landuse invult. De functie park (Leisure) ligt daar helemaal los overheen.
eggie (2017-09-26 08:38:23+00:00): Wel nog een beetje lastig hier, want er zal nog niet veel groeien. :)
eggie (2017-09-26 08:39:49+00:00): Niet elk stukje groen is een park... Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
Je zou het als landuse=village_green kunnen taggen.
user_6703715 (2017-09-26 09:30:25+00:00): Just learnt about GPS tracks, apologies if I alligned roads incorrectly.
rab (2017-09-26 18:10:53+00:00): It is a "buildings only" project and this Island Roads are no Help at all
Leader1 (2017-09-27 15:10:45+00:00): I am contributing to OSM, not just to a project. I added them because while doing validation, i have noticed that all buildings on this task were already added. And i like to add objects while doing validation. :) 
I first make sure that the project's prerogatives (buildings) were respected before adding roads. 
Even if it does not help for the project, it contributes to OSM database.
Thank you so much for understanding!
Harel M (2018-10-16 19:35:36+00:00): Hi Zackz19.
Is this a real campsite? If so can you please change its name to its official name or remove the name completely?
eggie (2017-09-26 16:48:06+00:00): Goed bezig. Je zou voordat je gewend raakt aan editor iD (zeer beperkt) eens kunnen overwegen om over te stappen naar editor JOSM Die heeft ook een validator die me voor heel wat foute uploads heeft behoed. Even lastig in het begin maar je zult daar veel plezier aan beleven. 
Zie: editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 15:21:35+00:00): Hello makhauta. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527780458 you have tagged `brrier` instead of `barrier`, right? #typo
eggie (2017-09-26 09:52:56+00:00): Middels PB contact gehad
Hjart (2017-09-26 09:36:03+00:00): Tilladelser? Der var jo tale om et forbud (bicycle=no) der havde til formål at lede cyklister over på cykelstien
Jens Kjær Breuning (2017-09-26 09:49:10+00:00): Det er mig der har sat den til bicycle=no, jeg har desuden tidligere flyttet rcn70 fra kauslundevej til cykelstien.
Hjart (2017-09-26 09:52:05+00:00): Så cykling på det stykke af Kauslundevej er alligevel tilladt?
Hjart (2017-09-26 10:02:32+00:00): Jeg så iøvrigt godt at du flyttede rcn70 og fandt efterfølgende nogle huller i ruten, som jeg lappede
Jens Kjær Breuning (2017-09-26 10:29:42+00:00): Nej cykling er ikke tilladt. Da jeg ændrede det stod bicycle til yes.
Hjart (2017-09-26 10:33:47+00:00): Åh, undskyld. Jeg læste det i første omgang, som at du fjernede og ikke tilføjede det tag :-/
ghostrider44 (2017-12-07 16:09:24+00:00): Hallo Stingray 80,
du hast auf dem Parkplatz beim Mühlwiesencenter nochmals einen Node gesetzt. Der allgemein übliche Editor JOSM meldet folgenden Fehler:
•	amenity innerhalb von amenity - amenity=parking innerhalb von amenity=parking (1)

Ich möchte dich deshalb bitten, den Node wieder zu entfernen und evtl. zusätzliche Daten bei dem bereits vorhandenen Parkplatz einzutragen.

Gruß ghostrider44
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 15:46:30+00:00): Hello makhauta. Please review your changeset, because you have tagged all building as `bulding`. #typo
jaap de vries (2017-10-16 08:28:37+00:00): Als je een opmerking oplost, wil je dan deze ook op groen zetten? Nu staat er nog een rood kruisje op de kaart, als je deze oplost komt er een groen vinkje.
Constable (2017-11-09 10:47:09+00:00): Ciao, per favore puoi dare un'occhiata a questa nota https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1200229
Tu con questo changeset hai rimosso il tag access=private, lì qualcuno sostiene che la strada sia privata, che il nome sia sbagliato,...
La delibera dovrebbe essere questa http://www.halleyweb.com/c043017/de/attachment.php?serialDocumento=00081F020143H
Grazie mille, ciao
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-11-10 08:45:02+00:00): Ciao,
avevo inserito io access=private dalla prima segnalazione della persona che ha inserito la nota.
Questa persona ha contattato la OSM Foundation e successivamente Wikimedia Italia. Da foto scattate da un OSMer passato in MTB non risultano cartelli nè altre limitazioni, seguendo quindi la mappatura 'on the ground' il tag che avevo inserito per prudenza è stato tolto.
Il soggetto poi non vuole il tag access=private ma pretende che la way sia eliminata.
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-11-10 08:48:04+00:00): http://www.cronachemaceratesi.it/2013/07/22/inaugurata-lasinovia-dei-sibillini/355582/
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-11-10 08:52:23+00:00): Ah, leggi qui le accuse e insinuazioni del soggetto, dalla mancata trasparenza di Wikimedia Italia (solo perchè da Monza hanno trasferito l'ufficio e ora sono a Milano con prefisso telefonico 039) e via di seguito. Vediamo come prosegue https://twitter.com/webagwriter
Constable (2017-11-10 09:10:26+00:00): Ciao, grazie per le risposte, beh se ha già parlato con Wikimedia e con la OSM Foundation queste note non hanno senso di restare aperte.
Ciao