piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
streckenkundler (2018-06-20 19:49:36+00:00): Hei... erledigt.. Es war einfacher, das ganze Changeset zurückzusetzen... Es waren 2 Konflikte... Ich denke, den Rest herauszuoperieren, wäre recht aufwendig gewesen...

Sven
mavl (2018-07-20 13:45:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:49:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:20:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:31:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:53:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:31:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Markus366 (2018-06-11 12:32:28+00:00): Hallo,

ich hab die beiden Wege mal zusammen gefügt und den Verlauf gem Esri etwas verfeinert.

MfG Markus
Anton Khorev (2018-06-20 06:16:37+00:00): Сначала вы удаляли сайты, потому что там "только общая информация про сеть"
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48537466).

Теперь вы в некоторых местах заменяете страницу конкретного ресторана на http://www.mcdonalds.ru/
Anton Khorev (2018-06-20 06:22:49+00:00): Информацию типа режима работы берёте с сайта, но там она может отличаться от реальной. Например Макдоналдс на Рубинштейна: согласно сайту 07:00-23:30, согласно тому, что написано на дверях 06:00-04:00. Правильно обычно бывает на дверях, я проверял. Это касается всех любителей делать и нелюбителей обсуждать импорты
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52685420).
Pavel47 (2018-06-20 17:28:16+00:00): вики рекомендует "Use as short an URL as possible". Система внутренних ссылок частенько меняется, и чтобы уменьшить вероятность пользователя увидеть 404 - лучше указать ссылку на корневой домен
Pavel47 (2018-06-20 17:29:41+00:00): Насколько помню, мак на Рубинштейна ночью всегда закрывался. Если что-то висит на дверях - скорее всего это кратковременно, и в базе это изменять смысла особого нет
Константин Гам (2018-06-25 15:27:29+00:00): Эта правка убила кучу реальных данных крапотливо собранных вручную, скоро откатим :)
Pavel47 (2018-06-25 16:57:35+00:00): Господа, говорить об откате при 1 неточности в 50 затронутых объектах - как-то неконструктивно. Если есть неточности - пишите конкретно. Про веб-странички замечание принял. С Рубинштейна непонятная ситуация, т к на оф сайте режим работы в других точках сменился оперативно, а здесь расхождения почему-то.
Anton Khorev (2018-06-25 17:19:50+00:00): "при 1 неточности" - вот, например, ещё одна:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/588525045
mavl (2018-07-20 13:50:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:41:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:25:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 14:00:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:47:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:22:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
lyctkel (2022-06-26 15:37:08+00:00): こんにちは、リボンです。
現在、めったに使われないbuilding=*タグを調査しています。
その過程で、building=thouを使用しているhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398868098 を発見しました。
このタグはここでしか使われておらず、タイプミスのように見えます。このタグはここでしか使われておらず、タイプミスのように見えますが、修正するのを手伝っていただけませんか？
よろしくお願いします。
lyctkel

Hi ribbon,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398868098 which uses building=thou.
This tag is only used here and looks like a typo. Please can you help me correcting it?
Regards,
lyctkel
ribbon (2022-06-26 23:43:11+00:00): Thank you for your message.
It is may be TYPO.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:50:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:48:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:29:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:45:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:24:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:31:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mjbmr (2018-06-14 20:48:26+00:00): سلام، اسم این خیابان شهید بهشتی نیست
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:44:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:30:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:45:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:39:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:23:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:32:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
woodpeck (2018-11-04 10:54:30+00:00): Please do not perform such mechanical edits. They add no information. The is_in tags aren't generally used any more - the fact that a place is in Africa is clear from its coordinates, it does not have to be made explicit in an is_in tag.
eggie (2018-06-10 14:59:06+00:00): Je hebt een barrier fence ingetekend. Dat kan. Maar dat hek hoort niet de naam Landal te krijgen. Graag reactie
mavl (2018-07-20 13:48:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:52:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:28:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
eggie (2018-06-10 15:00:18+00:00): Ook hier hetzelfde. Zou je de naam willen verwijderen svp. Probeer ook je edits concreet te beschrijven. Graag reactie.
eggie (2018-06-10 15:50:07+00:00): name=Landal heb ik van het hek verwijderd. Op de node van de camping zelf zou je de naam kunnen aanpassen.
MaartenMap (2018-06-10 18:12:21+00:00): Ok excuus, weet nog niet precies hoe het werkt..
eggie (2018-06-10 18:26:59+00:00): Dag maarten.. er wordt je niets kwalijk genomen. In het begin volgen we de eerste edits van startende mappers .. ook om te helpen. Lees je goed in .. De welkomstmail met nuttige zal nog wel ergens in je mailbox van OSM zitten.
Zoniet geef een seintje.
MVG,
Eggie
gendy54 (2018-06-11 09:52:07+00:00): Bonjour,

Vos modifications ne sont toujours pas conformes aux bonnes pratiques décidées par TOUTE la communauté, malgré notre très nombreux rappels. Merci d'arrêter ce carnage qui nuit à OpenStreetMap. Nous avons déjà passé assez de temps sur votre cas et n'avons pas que ca à faire. Nous redemandons le blocage.
nevw (2018-06-11 01:52:10+00:00): I reverted your edits as Google is not permitted to be used used as a source in any way, you have shifted and damaged other mapped items, it is unclear what is being added and are unlike expected tagging.
DIZZAgroup (2018-06-11 12:19:38+00:00): Hi very sorry about that. I didn’t realise I was manipulating the maps for everyone to see. Our company hauls network fibre cables in the underground conduits. The references I added are just the loc numbers of access pits and manholes for underground access. I will make sure not to use the maps like this again.
nevw (2018-06-11 13:12:34+00:00): Hi, you may be able to use umap or leaflet to overlay that type of info on an openstreetmap background for your company use. I am not familiar with either but they are often recomended for information that may not be for general consumption and especially if derived using Google. Osm is only allowed to use the satellite info provided in the editor interfaces or other datasets for which we have obtained specific permission to use.
SomeoneElse (2018-06-10 14:11:12+00:00): Just to summarise the changes here:
o https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/596114658 replaces https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7373542 , and it's previous outers form part of the new building way.
o https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/297356 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505918020 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505918019 essentially unchanged, except for extra nodes where the platform bridge was joined to the "building" way that was contiguous with the platform.
This shouldn't look any different on osm.org's "standard" map or at the default at https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html , but will anywhere that has a bleeding edge osm2pgsql - follow https://switch2osm.org/manually-building-a-tile-server-18-04-lts/ and you'll see that https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7373542 wasn't rendered at all before.
DaveF (2020-05-24 14:59:56+00:00): Hi
Please use train_station instead of railway_station.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dtrain_station
hsc666 (2018-06-10 19:07:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59719657 where the changeset comment is: Revert fictional park added to cheat Pokémon Go. Edits on OSM must match the reality on the ground! https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2018/04/01/tips-pokemon-go-2
4004 (2018-06-11 17:43:20+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
немного не тот тег, поправил. то, что вы поставили - это урна
domgo (2018-06-11 20:35:35+00:00): Спасибо, буду знать.
abakus_uploader (2018-06-10 22:32:10+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 06:30:29+00:00): Hello!

What you think about subclassing shop=trade for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162941710/history and tagging it as shop=trade trade=survey_equipment ?

Especially as shop=survey is really rare and large chunk of it is from various tagging mistakes
skgrange (2023-03-20 15:39:34+00:00): Hello. Sure, that seems like a reasonable enhancement to me.
GerdP (2018-10-02 09:19:19+00:00): Hi! I wonder what you tried to map here.
You have created some ways with highway=route and more tags corresponding to the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2972065
Did you mean route=ferry instead? See
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry
yumean1119 (2018-10-04 04:35:59+00:00): To GerdP:
I'm a local mapper in Okayama. Some national highways in Japan contain ferry routes. National Route 58 is such a way with the longest ferry routes, connecting Kagoshima and Naha via Tanegashima and Amami Oshima.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japan_National_Route_58
GerdP (2018-10-04 05:23:54+00:00): To yumean119:
OK, maybe you can correct the wrong parts so that routing will work?
yumean1119 (2018-10-04 16:25:45+00:00): To GerdP:
To tell the truth, if routing engines showed the way from Kagoshima to Naha via Route 58, it would be a serious mistake. Why? The marine routes in Route 58 from a legal point of view are different from actual ferry routes, and no ferries are operated now between Tanegashima and Amami Oshima. The other ferry routes(Kagoshima to Tanegashima and Amami Oshima to Okinawa) are acutually operated and their ways are mapped separately from Route 58.
In conclusion, it would be the best to leave these "wrong" parts  inaccessible.
Otenkiya (2018-10-04 21:47:54+00:00): To GerdP and yumean119:
The road route is a series of structures, not traffics. And, in principle, the national highway is certified as continuous road structures. 
In the case of Route 58, the route is determined to pass over the sea, but the operators (Government of Japan and local municipalities) does not provide any services (All existing ferries are operated by private enterprises and are not directly connected to Route 58). However, since the routes need to be contiguous, I simply drawn the line using the provisional tag "highway=route" to indicate the connection. To indicate that it is irrelevant to traffic, I use "access = no."
In the area of Japan, there is a precedent that the line was drawn in order to show that it is continuous even if there are unspecified parts at the municipality boundary.
GerdP (2018-10-08 09:12:30+00:00): Maybe you can use highway=no instead?
Otenkiya (2018-10-29 12:32:54+00:00): In Japan, if the road is legally certified, it will be treated as having a route even if there is no physical entity. For example, in road statistics, the total length includes the maritime section.
I feel that "highway = no" even denies the existence of a legal concept.
GerdP (2018-10-29 12:50:09+00:00): OK, I give up. You want to establish a new tag here and up to now it seems that I am the only one who doesn't like it. Since you added access=no at least it should not any harm.
Hjart (2018-06-10 14:38:10+00:00): Parkeringsplads
R0bst3r (2018-06-11 07:11:01+00:00): Hallo zwiebel_sehr_baugebiet,
auch die Eintragung sieht gur aus. Aber eine Frage: war die Verschiebung des Briefkastens beabsichtig? Siehe https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59713712
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59713712
PT-53 (2018-06-11 13:45:23+00:00): Hallo Geomapper69,
Du hast für den Kreuzberg in Unterkirchberg ein MP angelegt. Warum ? Die beiden Outer-Ways hätte man doch auch als einen Way einzeichnen können mit landuse=religious (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dreligious) , oder ?

Grüße
PT-53 (2018-06-11 13:46:22+00:00): Noch ne Frage:
Was hat der Kreuzberg mit dem OSM-Inspector zu tun ?
Geomapper69 (2018-06-11 13:54:13+00:00): OSM inspector highlights errors on the map. http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/  
I have been removing ways with a single node, which are geometry errors.
PT-53 (2018-06-11 14:15:53+00:00): Das erklärt aber nicht, warum Du ein MP neu angelegt hast. Das könnte man doch ohne MP einfacher lösen, oder ?
Grüße
highflyer74 (2018-06-12 15:20:39+00:00): @Geomapper69: PT-53 was referring to the fact that you, most probably unintentional, produced a multipolygon relation made of two lines which instead should have been a simple closed way. I fixed it now. Greetings!
Luzandro (2019-06-28 17:25:20+00:00): Hallo Reiner,

beim Umbau des Achauer Bahnhof ist mir wieder einmal der Wanderweg 888 aufgefallen. Gibt es da (noch) Markierungen, oder hast du irgendeine externe Quelle dafür verwendet? Bei den Abschnitten, die ich kenne, kann ich mich nicht erinnern, dass mir schon jemals irgendwo eine Markierung aufgefallen wäre.

s.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1083993

LG Andreas
Warin61 (2021-02-19 03:15:43+00:00): Hi
For the Ghan - under public transport V2 I don't think places where the train does not stop should be in the route relation.

What should be in the relation are places it does stop... those are missing. 

The other thing is the direction .. the relation is only for one direction as tracks and stops can be on different sides, at least in some places.
Ewen Hill (2021-02-19 11:48:03+00:00): Thanks Warin61 - A lot busy with work atm but will look at it when time permits.
Glixbit (2018-06-14 20:57:17+00:00): Looks like I saved a bunch of edits under the same comment, still a new user.
maraf24 (2018-06-26 15:10:10+00:00): Poprawiłem.
eggie (2018-06-10 15:40:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Graag concreet commentaar wat je edit inhoudt.
eggie (2018-06-10 15:46:26+00:00): Tip: Je zou ook iets van de landuse kunnen invullen bv de stukken bos en de info op een node Leisure=playground  zetten. Zo is het wel een enorme speelplaats geworden. 
MVG,
Eggie
opendcc (2018-06-10 19:35:54+00:00): Hallo,

bin mal neugierig: was wird denn da im Wald gemacht?
CDSG (2018-06-11 18:33:23+00:00): Das ist eine kleine Sprengstofffabrik, mit mehreren kleinen Bunkern, relativ gut im Wald geschützt
opendcc (2018-06-11 18:57:25+00:00): Ah, again what learned ... bin zwar schon ein paar mal quer durch diesen Wald gelaufen, aber da war ich noch nie.
naoliv (2018-08-11 03:07:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61556585 where the changeset comment is: Reverting vandalism
maraf24 (2018-07-11 21:15:11+00:00): Poprawiłem.
eggie (2018-06-10 17:55:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Heeft het restaurant wellicht ook een naam?
eggie (2018-06-10 17:59:08+00:00): Info naar adresnode verplaatst
BER319 (2018-06-10 18:32:14+00:00): Hallo sandrow75,

warum löschst du hier die Häuser und zeichnest diese dann neu ein? Was soll da?
Hast du keinen Respekt vor der Arbeit anderer?
Wir können deine Art auch gerne einmal im Forum diskutieren.
JJIglesias (2018-06-10 19:09:54+00:00): POR FAVOR: NO PONER "CASA" o "VIVIENDA" o "V" como nombre de una vivienda de uso habitacional. Al colocar building=house ya el sistema asume que es una CASA, las edificaciones llevan NUMEROS y Calles en sus direcciones pero NO LLEVAN Nombre, excepto edificios y negocios.... 
Con esto que estan haciendo estan EMBASURANDO el MAPA que tanto trabajo ha tomado en construir...
praeteritum (2022-09-25 05:55:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126603048.