piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-15 15:37:38+00:00): Matai, gal tai ir kitoks tiltas, bet faktas, kad tai ne tunelis. Baidarės per jokius tunelius nesimaršrutizuoja, nes net hardcore baidarininkai nelenda į vamzdį :-) Na bet sakau, žymėk, kaip išeina - aš prisidėsiu kokį nors savo tagą šitam konkrečiam atvejui apdoroti kaip ne tuneliui.
eggie (2020-08-04 18:24:26+00:00): Dag Overloon.. Lijkt me prima gelukt zo.
MVG,
Eggie
cserpell (2020-08-05 15:16:24+00:00): This change clearly does not know the place, as recently a user removed it because the street does not exist. If you stopped mapping according to assumptions, and looked the sat photo and history of the object, you would know.
Nodestrawaymus (2020-08-05 16:19:15+00:00): Thank you for the information.
gileri (2020-08-04 18:39:14+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap et merci pour ta contribution !

Est-ce que le restaurant s'apelle bien "Indien" : 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7784978485

Si c'est le type de cuisine que tu voulais indiquer, il y a l'étiquette "cuisine=indian" qui est faîte pour ça.

Éric
jleedev (2020-08-04 20:08:03+00:00): Please don't do this.
- It's fine for roads to be unnamed. It's spatially obvious what the road is inside of, and it would make turn-by-turn navigation annoying, especially for fake names such as these.
- The names you've used here are purely fictional unless you can provide some sort of source. I don't believe there are street signs with these names.
- You made an error by naming the roads inside Saint Marys Cemetery incorrectly.
- You made an error by putting a name on some nodes, which doesn't mean anything. Try to be careful.

I will revert this.
borishag (2020-08-05 07:57:22+00:00): Hallo, ICI PARIS XL is een merknaam die alleen met hoofdletters geschreven wordt (zie wiki pagina) zou je deze wijziging weer kunnen terugzetten?
Ehw_osm (2020-08-05 09:43:13+00:00): In de header van de website wordt de naam in camel case geschreven, vandaar dat ik deze spelling heb aangehouden. Op de wiki pagina staat het ook nog als "ICI Paris XL" gespeld, wat ik op de site van Ici Paris Xl nergens terugvind. Persoonlijk vind ik camel case netter dan all caps.
borishag (2020-08-10 11:33:44+00:00): Al onze 301 ICI PARIS XL winkels in België, NL en Luxemburg worden met hoofdletters vermeld op OSM net als bv HEMA. Onze handelsnaam is ook gedeponeerd in kapitalen. Voor de uniformiteit binnen OSM is het beter dat je de naam van deze vestiging weer terugzet met hoofdletters.
Borishag, editor AS Watson stores.
eggie (2020-08-04 19:20:43+00:00): Dag Overloon
De node amenity=parking heb ik verwijderd van de parkeerplaats. 
Of een node .. of een vlak.. 
Gr eggie
jleedev (2020-08-04 20:10:33+00:00): Cemetery roads are not highway=residential, they should be highway=service.

Nodes that make up a road should not be tagged with the name of the road.
eggie (2020-08-04 19:22:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
czubi (2020-08-07 15:37:53+00:00): Hallo Knopi, gibt es eine Grund warum du die Scheune gelöscht hast? Die steht doch da noch!?
czubi (2020-08-07 15:38:12+00:00): Ich habe sie wieder ergänzt.
Hendrik Knop (2020-08-07 15:44:18+00:00): Ja Sorry,
Sollte nur die Straßennummer weg, da sie keine eigene hat 🙈😂

BTW:
In der Mitte ist die Scheune geteilt und der hintere Teil gehört zum Nachbargrundstück 🙃

Danke👍👍👍
czubi (2020-08-07 16:37:22+00:00): Ist das hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358232837
dann neu die Nr. 36 die du gelöscht hast?
Hendrik Knop (2020-08-07 16:49:26+00:00): Ja ...
Zumindest bis zum Herbst.
Dann wird die Hauptstraße in Fortführung von Neudietendorf kommend in "Kornhochheimer Straße" umbenannt und die Nummerierung komplett neu geordnet.

Gebe Gerne Bescheid, wenn es soweit ist ...
czubi (2020-08-07 17:07:01+00:00): Ja, die Straßenumbenennungen habe ich alle schon als proposed:name vorbereitet nur die Nummern fehlen noch. Wenn das feststeht kannst Du gerne Bescheid sagen, sitzt ja an der Quelle ;-)
czubi (2020-08-07 17:07:25+00:00): Die Hausnummer ergänze ich noch, danke
zyphlar (2020-08-05 07:14:42+00:00): making tiny edits to geometry across hundreds of miles is not recommended. i'm sure you can contribute in much more useful ways, for example adding building addresses or local business names.
user_5359 (2020-08-05 18:23:41+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown keys in this change set. 
DANE:a
divipola
entidad_te
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
JLOSM (2020-08-06 12:02:30+00:00): Hi, thanks for write.
The term "DANE: a" had been incomplete; It really is "DANE: area", which has already been corrected and refers to the total area in square kilometers that corresponds to the municipality. In case of putting "area = *", it would not allow to put the numerical value, since JOSM would throw an error.
"divipola": code that by Political Administrative Division corresponds to the municipality, according to the Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE).
"entity_te" (territorial entity): refers to the most populated area of a municipality.
We find these terms in most of the relationships of the municipalities created in Colombia.
As for the source of information, it is related in the set of changes.

Regards
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2020-08-18 15:43:10+00:00): Доброго дня. Будь-ласка, поясніть детальніше, чому було змінено статус дороги T-12-15 на головну (primary), і, якщо Ви користувалися джерелами, звідки конкретно взято цю інформацію?
abakus_uploader (2020-08-04 22:31:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2020-08-04 19:54:26+00:00): Waarom building roof verwijderd?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88945025
De benzinepomp staat al getagd.
dat hoeft niet 2x
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88945025

Ook hier alleen maar namen. dat doet echt niets in OSM.
Smeet staat al op de kaart.. Niet dubbeltaggen. Op de adresnode is dan prima, maar wel de aard van het bedrijf erbij.
Kijk svp nog ebven naar je edits.
MVG
Eggie
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-08-04 20:02:01+00:00): Konak heb ik op de adresnode gezet.. geen adresinfo op gebouwen svp. De overkapping heb ik hersteld. 
De namen graag zelf aanvullen. Het mest zal office=company zijn.
eggie (2020-08-04 20:04:02+00:00): Smeets even als voorbeeld aangevuld.
Verder up to you!
Gr eggie
user_2954791 (2020-11-12 18:03:32+00:00): Die Straße ist mit surface=ground > "gewachsene, naturbelassene Oberfläche, man kann Trampelpfade von Menschen oder Tieren erkennen. Ähnlich surface=earth." Wieso? Sollte es sich um eine Baustelle handeln sollte highway=construction eingetragen werden.
user_5359 (2020-08-05 04:59:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (you are not a church). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
eggie (2020-08-04 19:50:56+00:00): Idem.. Zinloos om dit te doen.. Voeg office=company als regel bij
of een betere omschrijving. 
Kijk steeds in de wiki hoe te taggen
MVG,
eggie
Glassman (2020-08-06 23:38:52+00:00): Tip: square buildings by selecting the outline, then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88945708
eggie (2020-08-04 19:49:20+00:00): Beste Brandweer... Alleen namen taggen op adressen doet helemaal niets.. Je zult een combinatie moeten maken met de aard van het bedrijf.
Bv shop=????
Zie wiki
of
office=company
Kijk svp nog naar je edits
user_5359 (2020-08-05 18:19:54+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set.
MILEPOST=120
OR_SUBDIVI=HASTINGS
RAILROAD=BNSF
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
nmjwx (2020-08-05 23:09:51+00:00): Hi,

The data I uploaded is mile post data for the railroads across Nebraska. Much like highway mile markers/reference posts, this information is used by train crews and dispatchers alike to coordinate movements along rail lines. The same information can be found here: https://fragis.fra.dot.gov/gisfrasafety/.

The three pieces of information within each node are as follows: "MILEPOST" is actual numerical value in miles from the start of the point of measurement. For example...along the Union Pacific line across Nebraska (original transcontinental railroad), the numbers increase as you head west. In this case, they are counting the number of miles from the spot where rails were first laid in Omaha. So North Platte, NE is located along Mile Post 283 which is 283 miles west along the route from Omaha.

"OR_SUBDIVI" is the namesake for the line, or Subdivision, which is typically named after the town or city a yard is located in along the line. Examples across Nebraska are the Union Pacific's Omaha Subdivision, Columbus Subdivision, Kearney Subdivision, and Sidney Subdivision.

And finally, the "RAILROAD" is the owner (company) of said line. Combining all three pieces is how rail crews and dispatches identify where they are at usually (in the old days before computers tracked everything now). So a train entering Kearney, NE would identify themselves as being at Mile Post 188 of the UP Kearney Subdivision.

All this information is from the FRA GIS website (link above).
user_5359 (2020-08-06 04:30:22+00:00): Please refrain from uploading any data with unknown keys to OSM without permission. Please inform yourself about import guidelines and clean up your previous imports. I have additional doubts that the license entitles you to upload this data into OSM at all ("... is provided for U.S. Government-authorized use only."). 
Also, these points make very little sense without connections to the tracks.
mueschel (2020-08-08 12:32:45+00:00): I reverted this changeset. Please address the issues mentioned above before attempting a clean import of data.
itineris (2020-11-03 19:55:47+00:00): Szia!

Valamiért törölted a 131-es út darabjait az útdíjas kapcsolatból is, pedig a teherautók útdíjazásához használjuk ezt az információt (és ott még nem számozták át a szakaszt). Kérlek, legközelebb figyelj oda jobban, és csak olyat törölj, amiben biztos vagy!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
mapko (2020-11-03 20:19:14+00:00): Szia.
Elnézést kérek.
user_5359 (2020-08-05 04:41:32+00:00): Hello! Please use mix cased for the name and addr:street value. 
A street name should generally not be used to describe the placement of the parking lot position. The access way to the car park should be drawn in as well.
ri0t (2021-09-24 13:11:45+00:00): Das war kein Fantasiename. Der See wurde vom Pächter endlich korrekt benannt. Der frühere Name "Dorfteich" war ja auch kein Fantasiename - dafür  langweilig und generell schlecht.
user_8334278 (2020-08-04 20:12:30+00:00): if you don't like it then you go there.
redd (2021-10-03 12:35:31+00:00): Hi Pyram,
was ist mit roof:shape=shed gemeint am Akademiegebäude (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/209307683/history).
Laut Wiki ist die Beschreibung unklar, kannst du dich noch errinnern, was gemeint war? Sieht lauft Luftbild nach Flachdach mit Solarzellen aus.. 
Gruesse, 
redd
redd (2021-10-03 12:56:45+00:00): Update:
Habe bei G*** E*** gespitzt und dort sieht man in der Tag, dass die Dachform nicht ganz so einfach zu beschreiben ist. Das sieht so aus wie ein mehrreihiges Industrie-Tageslicht-Dach. Bisher gibt es dafür kein simplen roof:shape=Wert, daher wäre eventuell der anerkannte roof:shape=many möglich. Sehe aber auch keinen drigendenden Bedarf das shed nun zwingend zu entfernen
pyram (2021-10-04 08:26:15+00:00): Das ist eher ein Platzhalter. Und ja, es ist ein Sheddach ( https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheddach ). Dieser Value wird aber schon gelegentlich genutzt und ist nicht exotisch: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/roof%3Ashape#values (bisher 1322 mal)
Was ich grundsätzlich nicht nutze ist Unfug, wie "many" (15321 mal) oder "unknown" (93 mal). Das sagt nämlich genau *nichts* zur Form aus und suggeriert, dass hier schon jemand die Dachform erfasst hätte. Dann sollte man es besser weglassen, bis es jemand mit building:parts abbildet. Hier in diesem Fall war ich nur zu wenig motiviert es mit skillions zu modellieren.
brust84 (2020-08-04 20:37:01+00:00): Änderungssatz ist nicht richtig.  Objekttyp muss geändert werden, neuer Ort muss als neues Objekt korrekt angelegt werden.
Frans S (2020-08-06 12:19:03+00:00): Hello Barrence
Thank you so much for mapping on this project,
I have  remark on the quality of your mappings. Please map more accurate by following the outlines of a building and square each rectangular building.
Best regards and keep mapping
I copied you a PM with advises how to improve your mapping skills
user_8334278 (2020-08-04 20:50:36+00:00): adjustments.
user_8334278 (2020-08-04 20:53:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway#Foot_access_on_cycleways
Leo Slager (2020-08-05 10:26:07+00:00): Gebouwen en adress-nodes worden in NL rechtstreeks geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster. Huisnummers dus niet toevoegen aan de gebouwen. Kennelijk zijn bij de import de adressen vergeten.
Een verzoek voor de import kun je doen in het forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=796854#p796854
Leo Slager (2020-08-05 10:34:27+00:00): Huisnummer verwijderd van de gebouwen.
Her-import van de adress-nodes is aangevraagd in het forum.
Leo Slager (2020-08-09 16:24:14+00:00): En de huisnummers staan er weer, maar nu als een aparte adres-node.
ACarlotti (2020-08-05 22:22:10+00:00): Have you read the OpenStreetMap guidance on mechanical edits (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits)? Also the guidance on good changeset comments is relevant (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments).
Aside from probably contravening the policy on mechanical edits, there are a number of specific issues I've noticed with this changeset. (It seems likely that these issues and other similar issues will be present in other changesets you have made).

1. This changeset does a lot of different things in a number of different locations. The changeset comment does not give any useful explanation for why you are making any of these changes. Even if they could be explained with a single useful changeset comment (which they can't), it would still be useful to split this up into multiple changesets covering a smaller geographic area, so that people view your changesets can get a better understanding of what places are affected by them (unfortunately the main tools for viewing changesets either show just the bounding box, don't work properly for relations, or don't work if the bounding box is too large).
2. You've changed the tagging of 'Killarney Lake' from a reservoir to a lake. It clearly has a dam, so the lake tag may be incorrect (I couldn't find any clear information about what tag is appropriate if an existing lake is enlarged by building a dam, and I have no idea if that scenario is relevant here anyway).
3. You've moved a number of nodes near a fountain by a distance of less than 1m. Why? Also, you've used a fountain=water tag, which is not standard and appears not to have existed anywhere in the world before now.
4. You've been removing a lot of instances of the tag landuse=reservoir, despite this still being a permitted tag. (Mechanical edits that replace one permitted tag with an alternative permitted tag are particularly discouraged. The history of some of the objects you changed in this changeset shows that the change you made here has actually been made before and subsequently reverted).
5. The tag seamark:type=gate seems to just be a duplication of the tag waterway=lock_gate. While both seem to be indepently recommended in the wiki, there seems to be no discussion of why this duplicate tagging is necessary. (This isn't a specific issue for you; rather it's a more general observation that should perhaps be raised elsewhere.)

Can you explain why you have made the changes you made here? For any mistakes you've made, can you please fix them (if possible) and try to avoid making them again in the future?

Thanks,
ACarlotti
Mxdanger (2020-08-19 18:18:51+00:00): Thanks for your input, and I'll take it into consideration and avoid making large changesets like this.
EvanE (2020-08-04 22:02:07+00:00): Sorry I forgot the comment.

La France, Lyon, Parc Tête d'Or: Closed a gap in Flixbus route 720 at 'Avenue de Grande-Bretagne' (one way was missing). 

Did some validator work (removed/replaced maxspeed:type, add crossing(_ref)=* to highway=crossing, ...)

EvanE
user_5359 (2020-08-05 04:34:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
joost schouppe (2020-10-28 09:02:32+00:00): Wat bedoel je met bijenstand? Een bijenkorf? Dat zou eerder man_made=beehive dan craft=beekeeper moeten zijn denk ik dan
GR-menneke (2020-10-31 13:02:46+00:00): Beste Joost, Een bijenstand is een locatie waar meerdere bijenkorven staan, cfr. KB 07/03/2007
joost schouppe (2020-10-31 16:26:23+00:00): ok, bedankt - dan is man_made=beehive sowieso beter; ik heb ook een note laten staan op het object
Tomas Straupis (2020-08-05 05:15:53+00:00): Atjungiau atgal sujungtą unclassified kelią, nes jis yra maršruto (ryšio) dalis. Siūlyčiau persijungti į JOSM.Su iD didelė tikimybė sugadinti duomenis, nes iD skirtas tik labai nedideliems keitimams.
Leo Slager (2020-08-05 10:45:28+00:00): Met barrier=yes heb je het fietspad op slot gezet voor alle weggebruikers.
Dat haal ik even weg.
Leo Slager (2020-08-05 10:48:56+00:00): Hoe je zoiets op de kaart zet, kun je opzoeken in de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
scai (2020-09-29 14:00:37+00:00): Hi 9bwlazhk3uwwyq,

du hast hier Tags wie "alt_name_1", "alt_name_2" etc. verwendet. Laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Deprecated_tags sollten diese nicht mehr verwendet werden.

Grüße
Alex
Alexmol (2020-11-06 22:53:11+00:00): Olá.
Este posto não está em mais nenhum mapa, é de acesso público ?
pamf (2020-11-06 22:59:04+00:00): Sim, pelo menos quando foi marcado estava ativo. Neste mapa existe esse registo:https://www.electromaps.com/mapa/p/108635
Alexmol (2020-11-07 11:10:11+00:00): O posto parece que fica num alojamento. Posso chegar lá a qualquer hora e carregar ?
Se o acesso não é público devia-se colocar pelo menos as tags "access" e "opening_hours".
Free gems 8 (2020-08-06 06:47:17+00:00): hey kovoschiz, which satellite global imagery will be clearer? bing or esri?
Free gems 8 (2020-08-06 06:50:01+00:00): Seems that esri have clearer satellite global imagery. But is it accurate?
kartonage (2020-08-05 06:04:38+00:00): Hej,

entsprechend der Nachfrage hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88897861

Schöne Grüße
schmichael (2022-02-28 07:55:01+00:00): Hallo Jacky,

Frage: befindet sich südlich der Hochschule Offenburg ein Recycling-Container (Knoten 321011616, v9) mitten auf der Wiese?

Schöne Grüße, Michael.
whb (2023-07-10 12:49:46+00:00): Guten Tag,

da die Position so offensichtlich falsch ist und diese bisher nicht verbessert wurde, habe ich auf dem Luftbild in der Nähe der alten Position nach dem Container gesucht und ihn entsprechend dort hin verschoben:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/321011616

Wahrscheinlich war das nur eine versehentliche Verschiebung.

Viele Grüße
whb
Reeniz (2020-08-05 02:55:42+00:00): Hola trichocereus, añadiste la clave "wetland=*" en conjunto con el tag "natural=water" cosa que es incorrecto. Por otro lado, añadiste el nombre "Laguna en Salar El Laco". Es este nombre correcto?  Pareciera ser un nombre descriptivo. Ademas, etiqueto la laguna como "water=lagoon" y este tag hace referencia a una laguna costera. Si no esta seguro de que tag lleva un cuerpo de agua puede dejarlo simplemente como "natural=water". Estos son detalles y no es nada grave, pero si puede arreglarlos seria de gran ayuda. Finalmente, lo dejo invitado al chat de la comunidad. El link lo encontrara en mi perfil. Saludos!
trichocereus (2020-08-05 12:57:39+00:00): Por qué es incorrecto tener un cuerpo de agua dentro de un humedal? Cómo se debería etiquetar una laguna dentro de un salar?
Con respecto al nombre, así aparece acá https://dga.mop.gob.cl/administracionrecursoshidricos/areasprotegidas/Cartografa/Sitios_Ramsar_II.pdf
Etiqueté la laguna como "water=lagoon" porque esa es la traducción correcta en español y también el concepto geográfico adecuado, además la descripción de la etiqueta menciona a lagunas saladas, como es el caso de esta.
Reeniz (2020-08-05 15:10:46+00:00): No es incoreccto mapear un cuerpo de agua dentro de un humedal. El problema que mencione anteriormente es que a la laguna le agrego "wetland=*" y esta es una etiqueta que se usa en combinacion con "natural=wetland", no con "natural=water". 
Para el caso de que dice "water=lagoon" la wiki dice expecíficamente que es para uso de lagunas costeras("A lagoon is a body of shallow sea water or brackish water separated from the sea by some form of barrier."). Las traducciones de las etiquetas no son literales. Son por convenciones de la comunidad internacional. Saludos!
limes11 (2022-03-27 07:53:36+00:00): Hi, 

du hast hier aus einer Bank ein Restaurant gemacht. Das war doch sicher ein Versehen?!

VG. Limes
os-emmer (2025-04-18 10:28:44+00:00): Hello fuggy,
can you maybe help me with this note? You edited both of the objects at some point.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4449336
fuggy (2025-04-25 11:48:32+00:00): @os-emmer merged it
skquinn (2020-09-21 01:59:52+00:00): Great work on this changeset! I was in this area over the weekend and having this data on the map helped a lot.
angys (2020-08-05 01:05:02+00:00): Yes, this place actually in 4.2697, 101.1428
angys (2020-08-05 01:05:14+00:00): this is aman baru
pantufla (2021-08-30 06:15:46+00:00): Hola Julian, qué es esto de p1?
user_5359 (2020-08-05 04:26:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the tag private=yes. The ownership can be private or the access is private instead public.
ScottKane (2020-08-06 00:29:56+00:00): I didn't know what tag to use. This is definitely a private way but and the owner definitely doesn't want people coming down there as the sign says. As to public access of Private ways in general I think the law is a bit murky in Massachusetts on that. I live on a private way myself and have found answers hard to come by on this.
user_5359 (2020-08-06 04:38:37+00:00): "..and the owner definitely doesn't want .." means access=private. I build the way on private cost, but the law says who can use it: means ownership=private.
Booth keys can be combined.
RoadGeek_MD99 (2020-08-05 02:08:32+00:00): Hi Tornado0910,

Thanks for all the work in Harford County.  I noticed you added Aqua Culture at 22 Newport Dr.  Are you sure of that location, as it is already mapped on Commerce Rd (just northeast of the end of the runway)?  I was at 22 Newport on Aug 1st, and it was a vacant building.  Thanks and Happy Mapping!

RoadGeek_MD99
tornado0910 (2020-08-05 15:38:29+00:00): Hey RoadGeek_MD99!

I’m glad you pointed that out to me. Now that I think of it I’m not exactly sure. When mapping Newport Drive I was referring to Google maps and street view imagery, as well as my memory. However, Google still said that Aqua Culture was still at 22 Newport, but Google also says there’s one on Commerce as well. 
The 22 Newport Dr. building was once a swim school that I use to attend when I was younger. Formerly Kids First Swim, or something along the lines of that. 
I’ll leave 22 Newport Dr. as a vacant building until future physical verification, because quite frankly now I’m not too sure 😂.

Thank you for your observation!

-Tornado0910