piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
whb (2020-04-08 07:07:49+00:00): Guten Tag,
bei dieser Bearbeitung kam es zu größeren Verschiebungen.
Verbessert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83234591
skyper (2020-04-10 15:45:29+00:00): Oh, was habe ich da gemacht. Muss ich mir nochmal anschauen.
skyper (2020-04-10 16:00:28+00:00): Da habe ich wohl unabsichtlich eine Linie gedreht. Danke fürs Reparieren.
Warin61 (2020-04-21 03:35:21+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM... 

A problem with your edit. The bicycles appear to be able to ride around the 'cycleway' but they cannot ride to it on the footway as there is no bicycle=yes on it. 

The name tag should be for the name only, these appear to be descriptions where the tag description=* would be more appropriate? 

Please keep mapping.
hmaxwell (2020-09-23 14:12:19+00:00): These are spur lines, to be tagged with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dspur
klnkengi (2025-05-25 16:47:03+00:00): Hi, you have mapped two barriers here 5 years ago as a pandemic measure. Do you know if they still exist or if the bridge is passable again?
chachafish (2020-04-08 04:22:29+00:00): Howdy, rsavoye, just out of curiosity, are you importing buildings?
rsavoye (2020-04-08 04:30:05+00:00): Yes, with validated address from recently updated public domain data, and conflated against current OSM data. Rural Colorado maps look different after you realize how many buildings here are. I do have to double check the Bing footprints, as it thinks rocks and snow fields are buildings.
mapman44 (2020-04-08 04:55:43+00:00): Are these imports following the guidelines in the Wiki? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
rsavoye (2020-04-08 12:02:32+00:00): Yes, and other people are using the same data. This upload was a my mistake which I'll fix today. I was making a small change, and accidentally uploaded the entire raw data.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-08 12:08:58+00:00): If that "yes" was in answer to "Are these imports following the guidelines in the Wiki?" can you link to where this import has been discussed?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
rsavoye (2020-04-08 12:25:36+00:00): The bing footprints and aggregate addresses in Colorado are both public domain, and used for other projects. All I did was merge them together.
I did screw up by uploading more than I intended, fixing that now.
rsavoye (2020-04-08 12:38:14+00:00): As a GNU developer, and long time FSF and EFF member for 30 years, I'm very conscious of licensing issues, and understand why this is important. I also understand I have to be careful not to screw up, and fix my own mistakes.
SomeoneElse (2020-04-08 12:49:15+00:00): Separately to the licence, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines makes clear a number of things that you'd want to go through before doing an import.  Now it may be that this has already happened for this data - that's what I'm asking.
rsavoye (2020-04-08 13:01:22+00:00): There are multiple projects here in Colorado using the exact same address data, City of Denver, Mesa County, etc.. And Bing footprints too of course. These have been approved before, so I didn't think there would a problem. All I did was merge them together. I'll delete it all if you want, but addresses are important for emergency response, which is why I was adding them.
vorpalblade (2020-04-08 13:14:07+00:00): I'm going to chime in here:
Colorado Address Imports: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Colorado_Addresses

I do _not_ believe that rsavoye is using my preprocessed data, however, if he is using the same data source ( https://data.colorado.gov/State/Statewide-Aggregate-Addresses-in-Colorado-2019-Pub/n7je-akky ), the data is in the Public Domain. It looks like it was updated March 20th, though, so I'm going to need to update my copy of the dataset.

As far as Mesa County goes, I'm using _the county's_ data -- I'm giving them feedback on any issues I spot, so that is a different data source.
rsavoye (2020-04-08 13:21:35+00:00): The Colorado aggregate data comes from the Counties anyway, sometimes I even find the same spelling mistakes. I'm not using your processed data, sorry. I processed the same data files with my own software since I also does validation of street names so navigation works.
CurlingMan13 (2025-03-23 06:47:49+00:00): You mapped multiple vehicles as buildings...  Such as this one:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/789095739
rsavoye (2025-03-23 13:03:36+00:00): That's what  get  for using MS Bing footprints... I later discovered I can trace good buildings faster than validating the Bing data. Sorry you had to clean up my old mistakes, I prefer to fix my own bugs. Should I go check current OSM, or did you delete them all ?
BrunoSLowen (2020-04-18 16:42:18+00:00): Saudações.

Bacana, você alterado a classificação de vias (quando já há um padrão determinado), sugiro participação nos grupos de Telegram (http://www.openstreetmap.com.br/comunidade/). 
Também tenho notado realinhamento de nós (com imagens Bing, que não são as mais atualizadas pra essa região), o que não deve ser feito. O ideal é fazer o deslocamento da camada da foto de satélite.
Bacana (2020-04-18 19:29:09+00:00): Ok, obrigado pelas orientações.
Referente ao padrão das vias "copiei" de outras da região que possuem a mesma característica.
Sobre este deslocamento da camada da foto de satélite peço o favor de me direcionar onde aprendo a fazer.
BrunoSLowen (2020-04-25 11:41:16+00:00): Vi que você costuma fazer suas edições pelo iD, então segue um link que pode te ajudar a entender como fazer o deslocamento: https://learnosm.org/pt/beginner/id-editor/#configurar-a-camada-de-fundo
Pra essa região, (oeste paranaense) sugiro usar a camada do Maxar, é a mais atualizada e tem uma boa resolução.
Bacana (2020-05-03 15:56:09+00:00): Obrigado!
Aproveitando, tem como ver a data da imagem?
user_5359 (2020-04-08 04:11:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the value of your address.
mapman44 (2020-04-08 05:11:26+00:00): Could you please leave changeset comments explaining your edits? Thanks. Here's the Wiki reference: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83221812
MKnight (2020-05-22 09:41:18+00:00): Moin, du hast den Namen an der Kirche geändert, warum hast Du den alten Namen nicht als old_name belassen oder war der vorher falsch?
Kai Johnson (2025-07-06 22:30:46+00:00): It looks like some of these things were left over from some editing a few years ago. Would it be safe to delete them now?
camelCaseNick (2020-06-29 20:39:54+00:00): Hey,
your Wikipedia tag at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7377402573 does not have a language in it and seems not to be about en:Vargem or any municipality linked from pt:Vargem. What is it?
CamelCaseNick
jmapb (2020-04-16 16:16:05+00:00): Hi sabok, thank you for your contributions.

In the future please try to break changesets like this -- which span a large geographic area containing several huge cities -- into separate changesets per local region. This will be easier for humans and quality control software to digest.

Happy mapping, j
sabok (2020-04-17 04:32:42+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your response. This usually happens when iD editor doesn't respond while editing and we refresh the web-page. I was unaware of the change being saved.I shall follow restricting it to an area and avoid such long edits.

Regards,
sabok
aharvey (2020-04-09 00:35:35+00:00): Hi I see you've added trail_visibility=no, that usually only applies when there is no path at all is that the case here?
akladnig (2020-04-09 05:24:38+00:00): Yes - that is the case. It's a route that I followed and is used by a number of canyoners for access to various canyons  but is mostly off-track bushwalking.
akladnig (2020-04-09 05:31:48+00:00): Ohh - and I did visit your website a few days ago - looks like you're a real expert. FYI I'm tagging a number of canyons with route=canyoning as has been done in Europe which I'm using to generate my own personalized maps for my Garmin GPS. 
With regards to the trail_visibility=no I'm following the lead of Ozultimate  - e.g. see map of Wollangambe https://ozultimate.com/canyoning/maps/wollangambe_canyons.pdf
Cheers,
Adrian
aharvey (2020-04-09 07:30:20+00:00): Sounds good thanks for confirming. There's probably different opinions on what's trail_visibility=no and what's trail_visibility=horrible, for me it's generally no being completely off-track and horrible being some evidence of a path but frequently disappears. I'll trust your best judgement, it's more important to have no/horrible than none at all and someone things it's a well marked out track.

Yeah I saw your edits adding route=canyoning, good to see someone interesting in improving OSM in this aspect.

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=gorge you can use to mark the natural canyon feature (if it's a wet canyon then the tag would be on the same way as waterway=stream). I've done it for a dry canyon at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732287179

Eventually I start including natural=gorge tags on my maps for beyondtracks.com so would be nice to see more of these tags added.

route=canyoning normally would go on the relation not the way at least following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Canyoning but I'm not going to complain about it going on the way itself, it's not harmful and can always be converted to a relation later.

I hope you're not copying Tom's maps but instead using your own surveyed data since his maps are copyright, that said he does edit here sometimes, but you'd need to check and make sure he's happy to license it for use by OpenStreetMap.
akladnig (2020-04-09 13:20:08+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. Yep - I'm using my own GPS traces so not copying Tom's work.
Also I have done the canyon you've provided the link to - it's call Wolgan View Canyon. I like the idea of adding a natural= tag, but suggest that we use natural=canyon as that is in general the terminology used in Australia and the USA. Gorge is more of a European thing.  Having said that I'm tagging the route of the canyon as opposed to the actual "canyon" part of a canyon route. Thoughts? It would be nice to have some consistency with canyons given that no one has really made an attempt to tag them properly and this seems like a good time to get it somewhat right! Also I've had a look as the proposed canyoning tag - I'm still somewhat new with all of this so haven't got my head around relations as yet but I will not be adding entry and exit track for all canyons as some of the canyons need to be kept adventurous. e.g. I've not added access tracks to Thurat Rift Canyon or Davies Canyon and am of two minds whether I should delete the Mt Cyclops exit track - mind you these exits are detailed on Tom's site.
mapman44 (2020-04-08 04:50:50+00:00): Could you please provide a better description of your edits than "1." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83222631
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:29:42+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Tomas Straupis (2020-04-09 11:18:44+00:00): Please do not change tags as iD editor suggests. iD coders do not care about OpenStreetMap community and do not adhere to OpenStreetMap tagging rules.
iD's "outdated" tag functionality is a total crap.
#baniD
chachafish (2020-04-09 11:54:45+00:00): In regards to this changeset specifically, you are referring to landuse=basin?
Tomas Straupis (2020-04-09 12:10:46+00:00): Yes, change of landuse=basin to Russian water schema, propagated by Mapbox/iD.
chachafish (2020-04-09 12:15:49+00:00): Okay
mapman44 (2020-04-08 05:43:32+00:00): One of your footways says that motor_vehicles are allowed. Is that correct? Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83224735
A Common Porpoise (2020-04-08 15:34:59+00:00): It is an odd situation. A security guard has authority to use the pathway with a gold cart, otherwise it is foot and bicycle traffic only.
mapman44 (2020-04-08 15:42:03+00:00): Thanks for the response. It should be tagged for the general public who would not be allowed to drive a motor vehicle on it.
Richard (2021-11-16 09:08:26+00:00): Hi! When you're adding a driveway to which the public has no access, could you make sure you add the tags service=driveway and access=private? Thank you.
kumrnls (2021-11-17 07:03:52+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit.
Apologies, for the incorrect road classification, I'll ensure not to repeat such errors going forward. 

Thanks again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
kumrnls
mavl (2020-04-08 15:49:40+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок изменил статус дороги:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477532742/history  
  
Эта дорога действительно является жилой улицей и прежний статус был правильным.
Syl (2020-04-08 08:07:11+00:00): Bonjour, le bâtiment que vous avez supprimé n'existe plus ? Il est toujours visible sur les images aériennes et sur le cadastre.
Pour l'objet appelé "Siiimple", si c'est bien une entreprise il vaut mieux le préciser avec office=company comme vous l'avez fait ici par exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7377729185
Si vous voulez vous familiariser avec la contribution, iD sera beaucoup plus complet et vous permettra de mieux comprendre par rapport à Maps.me qui est très basique et fait faire des erreurs sans s'en rendre compte.
De plus iD propose un guide (un peu long mais assez complet) pour apprendre à contribuer.

N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions.
Siiimple (2020-04-08 08:28:49+00:00): Au temps pour moi, la suppression du bâtiment est une erreur de ma part. Je pensais l'avoir annulé !

Je vais prendre le temps de jeter un œil à la documentation de iD, merci !
Syl (2020-04-08 09:18:30+00:00): Je viens de restaurer le bâtiment.
Merci pour vos corrections !
apm-wa (2020-04-14 16:18:51+00:00): I mapped this area during personal surveys 2016-2019.  This old service road does not really connect to the main road to Taze Zaman.  Please see this image: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=9QqaMu1FriaqDJQpryoapQ&focus=photo&lat=38.04731003974962&lng=58.29611658583724&z=17
apm-wa (2020-04-14 16:19:58+00:00): Heavy trucks use it as a shortcut but it is not usable by regular traffic.
Samaipata (2020-04-15 01:01:06+00:00): Thanks for the comment, apm-wa. I just added a service road within the industrial area: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83228308. I think the connection to the public road was added by a different user in 2017: https://osmcha.org/changesets/48825585. Thanks for fixing it!
eserte (2020-04-13 16:03:57+00:00): Müsste dann nicht auch der Abschnitt ab Wagner-Regeny-Allee mit bicycle=dismount gekennzeichnet sein? (zurzeit auf der Standardkarte blau gestrichelt)
Lakeshore (2020-04-14 06:34:35+00:00): Du hast vollkommen recht. Merkwürdig, dass ich das übersehen hatte. Ist korrigiert.
user_5359 (2020-04-08 17:25:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
abakus_uploader (2020-04-08 22:30:59+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2020-04-08 17:44:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
eggie (2020-04-08 07:23:51+00:00): Lievr geen wegen verwijderen uit OSM. 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.


Wel kun je op een node het hek toevoegen met barrier=gate  (misschien lift_gate)  
Het weggedeelte dat prive is geef je dan access=private mee. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-08 07:30:07+00:00): reverted by changeset Wijzigingenset #83236191

Gewon de weg splitsen. Hek op node.
access=private toevoegen.. op het weggedeelte maar ook op het hek.
Succes,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-08 07:25:41+00:00): Beste Jonataha. Zou je willen stoppen met het verwijderen van wegen uit OSM
Gr eggie
jonathankoutstaal (2020-04-08 07:27:23+00:00): Goeiemorgen Eggie, je hebt helemaal gelijk met deze opmerkingen; ik zal de straat weer een stukje door trekken en er een hek in plaatsen.
eggie (2020-04-08 07:28:25+00:00): Je kunt het aanpassen, want ik heb je bijdragen teruggedraaid.
Succes en veel plezier met mappen.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-08 07:29:05+00:00): reverted by changeset #83236162
jonathankoutstaal (2020-04-08 07:29:45+00:00): Bedankt voor het meekijken! 

Groeten, Jonathan
jonathankoutstaal (2020-04-08 07:32:56+00:00): Heb ik het nu correct gedaan?
eggie (2020-04-08 07:49:47+00:00): Jonathan.. Ik denk dat je nog moet uploaden.
(Ik zie nog geen nieuwe wijzigingen.)
Dan kijk ik zo even. 
Die weg naar de parkeerplaats zal wel een highway=service moeten zijn.. access=private als het achter het hek ligt.
jonathankoutstaal (2020-04-08 07:51:55+00:00): Klopt, ik had de wijziging voor de andere straat alleen doorgevoerd, de Harry Banninkstraat heb ik nu pas gedaan.
cedaros (2020-04-08 07:28:27+00:00): Czy te zmiany są na pewno poprawne? Z tego co mi wiadomo w tym miejscu nie ma obiektu wojskowego.
Daggerio (2020-04-08 10:07:50+00:00): Witaj w zwiazku z nowym planem zagospodarowania terenu oraz relokacji  obiektow wojskowych na czas pandemi inwestor udostepnil obiekty na potrzeby kwarantanny, pozdrawiam Maciej A.
cedaros (2020-04-09 14:27:22+00:00): Czy mogę poprosić o jakieś źródło tych informacji?
Daggerio (2020-04-09 19:36:53+00:00): Witam nasz pracownik pomylił działki , edycja tego terenu zostanie cofnięta.
Daggerio (2020-04-09 19:42:47+00:00): hm tylko niestety nie wiem jak cofnąć jego pomyłkę
cyclist789 (2026-07-30 07:38:07+00:00): Kan du bekræfte at way/353276788 eksisterer? Jeg mistænker at vandet flyder væk derfra i begge retninger, så jeg ville fjerne det lille vandløb og markere vandløbet øst for det som flow_direction=unknown.
osmviborg (2026-07-30 07:47:17+00:00): Det er ikke mig der har tegnet vandløbet, blot tilføjet layer -1 (for seks år siden). Check history.
cyclist789 (2026-07-30 16:16:55+00:00): Ja, men du er den eneste, der havde sat source=survey.

Jeg laver de foreslåede ændringer.
mueschel (2020-04-11 14:04:49+00:00): Hi, 
this way got a strange tag, could you check that?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258684343
"nhrpheratage"
Syl (2020-04-08 08:10:44+00:00): Bonjour, pour la mairie il y a un tag spécifique amenity=townhall (mais apparemment non proposé par Maps.me malheureusement).
mueschel (2020-04-11 16:07:05+00:00): Hi,
I found the tag "kei = yes" on several ways - was that a mistake?

Cheers
Jan
javbw (2020-04-11 20:52:18+00:00): No, it was on purpose. 

It’s a possible tag or a placeholder until I find the right one. 

I added it because I needed to look up how to tag “小” vehicles. 

A lot of the train crossings ban:
- HGV
- “Cars” (but small kei vehicles okay)
- motor_vehicles entirely (Via bollards) 

I used kei= as a Placeholder in this case. 

If I can’t get a proper access tag, I will propose “kei” as an access tag for Japanese tagging. 

Javbw
mueschel (2020-04-12 08:27:07+00:00): I see.
Maybe you can find something appropriate in the regional Taginfo database?
https://taginfo.geofabrik.de/asia/japan
eggie (2020-04-08 08:42:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review.. Oke.. Ziet er goed uit. Tip: Liever niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat geeft wel eens onbedoelde schade door verschuivingen. 
Houd het gebied van je edits klein. 
MVG,
Eggie
Glassman (2020-04-08 14:28:11+00:00): I think you may have inadvertently moved Ruby's Theatre onto the baseball field. Can you move it back?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83236943
cedaros (2020-04-08 07:49:29+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie dodajesz te dane? To nie jest obiekt wojskowy.
Daggerio (2020-04-08 10:09:18+00:00): Witaj w zwiazku z nowym planem zagospodarowania terenu oraz relokacji obiektow wojskowych na czas pandemi inwestor udostepnil obiekty na potrzeby kwarantanny, pozdrawiam Maciej A.
RicoElectrico (2020-04-11 12:09:31+00:00): Nie mapujemy tymczasowych obiektów. Patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Nie_mapuj_tymczasowych_wydarze.C5.84_i_tymczasowych_obiekt.C3.B3w .

Należy też stosować bardziej szczegółowe opisy swoich edycji, które opisują co i dlaczego edytujemy. "Aktualizacja mapy" opisuje każdą edycję, więc jest nikłej użyteczności.

Wycofałem edycję z powyższych powodów oraz na prośbę z forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=782842#p782842
Carto'Cité (2020-04-14 16:59:57+00:00): Bonjour Dawild,
J'ai remarqué que tu avais retirer l'information segregated=no sur ce chemin :https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222779848
Cette information est relativement intéressante pour l'évaluation de la cyclabilité, la capacité à distinguer une « vrai piste cyclable » et probablement utile pour d'autres choses. Je me permet de le repréciser mais si tu as une raison de vouloir le retirer je veux bien la connaître. D'une manière générale avoir l'information segregated=yes/no explicité sur les différents aménagements piéton/vélo est utile.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Dawild (2020-04-15 05:20:42+00:00): Bonjour , oui j'ai fait la modification ,car c'est une voie partagée , cycles/piétons .
eggie (2020-04-08 08:18:59+00:00): Bijna goed..  Je hek staat op de T-kruising.., maar zou eigenlijk op de betreffende weg moeten staan op een node.
Dus waar hoort het hek?
eggie (2020-04-08 08:20:38+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=83237705
AkuAnakTimur (2020-04-08 07:57:48+00:00): This is waaaaaay much better: https://openstreetcam.org/details/2103406/620/track-info
eggie (2020-04-08 08:20:06+00:00): Jonathan.. Dit lijkt me oke.
aceman444 (2021-02-17 01:12:57+00:00): Dobry den, podla coho je ten izolovany usek cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128927087 highway=service a nie highway=track (polna cesta) ? To sa neurcuje podla povrchu, ale podla vyznamu cesty. Vy ste tam este pridali access=yes, teda pristup vsetkym vozidlam, hoci vsetky ostatne napojene cesty su polne, takze tam bezne vozidla pristup nemaju. Ako to teda je?