piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Adityo (2019-07-11 04:14:27+00:00): Hi di_vya,

Yes i think you're right, its inside the military area. So i think it use service.

And for the way 198741210, i think you also right. 

Thank you for correcting the data.
literan (2018-08-29 12:03:56+00:00): здесь действительно так тротуар в сторону сдвинули, и он через стройку проходит? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/608974546#map=18/55.84578/37.57566 Две недели назад ничего подобного не было...
usr1 (2018-08-30 06:52:34+00:00): Фото: https://yadi.sk/i/8a7_jtyN3agfHM
Новый тротуар проложен более месяца назад взамен старого, огибавшего стройку. Но не до конца, прерывается метров за 20 до тоннеля под ЖД путями. Поэтому изобразил его зигзагом в сторону проезжей части.
Фото: https://yadi.sk/i/8a7_jtyN3agfHM
kartonage (2018-08-30 17:08:34+00:00): Hallo Reinders Weinimport & Großhandel und willkommen bei OSM! Du hast ein Review angefordert.
//
Das Restaurant wäre als Punkt besser aufgehoben gewesen, schließlich gibt es in dem Gebäude ja auch noch andere Unternehmen. Aber da leider vorher auch nur ganz platt "ADAC Geschäftsstelle" am Gebäude stand, kann ich das schon fast verstehen. Ich hab es dementsprechend angepasst und noch ein paar Kleinigkeiten ausgebessert (Öffnungszeiten in Englischer Syntax, Telefonnummer internationalisiert). Hat ansonsten gepasst. :)
//
Wenn du Lust hast dich noch mehr in OSM einzubinden, kann ich dir folgendes Tutorial (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/file:Osm-tutorial.pdf) ans Herz legen. Ein Blick ins Wiki schadet auch nie (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite) und hilft einem schnell auf die Sprünge bestimmte Dinge richtig einzutragen.
//
Falls du Fragen hast, gern nachhaken. Ansonsten happy mapping!
kartonage (2018-08-30 17:13:02+00:00): Hallo Reinders Weinimport & Großhandel. Du hast auch hier ein Review angefordert.
//
Hier ist ein bisschen was schief gegangen. Die Fläche hinter den Gebäuden die besagt, dass die Nutzung des Areals hauptsächlich Wohngebiet ist, war nun ein Cafégebäude. Das ist natürlich nicht so und ich habe es kurzerhand wieder zurückgesetzt. Ansonsten war die Wahl als Punkt hier schon in Ordnung. Besser ist es aber einen eigenen neuen Punkt zu erstellen. Der vorhanden Punkt war nämlich hauptsächlich eine Adresse. Die kann man aber auch gern nehmen/kopieren und selbst benutzen. :)
//
Schöne Grüße
pesec (2018-08-30 11:17:24+00:00): В домах, находящихся в границах населенного пункта(НП), наименование НП не указывается, т.к. в поиске он автоматически определяется принадлежностью к НП. Лишняя информация утяжеляет карты.
Jakka (2018-08-29 12:11:54+00:00): What is the meaning of name "Niz Art Piazza"
overall name="Café Roder" and then a translation in three language all the same "Niz Art Piazza" not good
Jakka (2018-08-30 08:15:16+00:00): two resto same name ? Rue de Sète ?
Ygramul (2022-12-22 22:04:15+00:00): Hey, da du hier den Stadtplan von Tübingen als Grundlage genommen hast, würde mich mal interessieren, ob wir (OSM) generell eine Erlaubnis haben, die Geodaten der Stadt zu verwenden bzw. welche davon. Ich hab im Wiki nichts gefunden, wo sonst solche Einzelerlaubnisse vermerkt werden und nach Impressum des Tübinger Stadtplans steht dieser erstmal unter Urheberrecht mit keiner Erlaubnis der Verwendung außerhalb.
rene78 (2018-08-29 18:52:16+00:00): Ein Fluß? Sicher? :)
ikonor (2018-09-29 15:54:19+00:00): Hab's gelöscht, vermutlich für Pokemon Go
literan (2018-08-29 12:06:06+00:00): в Кремле одни Троицкие ворота, а не пара. К другим это тоже относится.
highflyer74 (2018-08-30 08:27:21+00:00): Guy, could you please stop adding this tagging to nodes of ways? I already commented here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60412096 on the same issue. If you do not accept my reasoning this will have to be addressed at a greater scale.
Guy Zohar (2018-08-30 15:25:40+00:00): Hello,
This tag suppose to indicate roads curvature. I assumed the wiki page covers the osm procedure. If you think it's not according to the OSM guidelines i'll stop adding that info. Thanks
WalkerB (2018-09-11 17:13:21+00:00): Dear Leila,

Thank you so much for digitizing in Afghanistan!  Your efforts really help fill in the map and help Afghan citizens.  As an aside, I saw there was an "unspecified line" under the tertiary road.  I think this might be the GPX file you were using.  I took care of it, but please remember to remove the GPX before upload.  Thank you again and I look forward to a fuller map of Afghanistan!

Kind regards,

Walker
yumean1119 (2018-09-07 08:52:53+00:00): はじめまして。OpenStreetMapおよびクライシスマッピングへの協力ありがとうございます。
建物はarea=yesではなく、building=yesとタグ付けするようにお願いします。area=yesだと建物として認識されず、せっかくの努力が役に立たないものになってしまいます。
JJIglesias (2018-08-29 18:25:56+00:00): Excelente,asi esta mucho mejor gracias.

Solo el detalle de Ortogonizar las construcciones
abakus_uploader (2018-08-29 22:30:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
JJIglesias (2018-08-29 18:24:47+00:00): Excelente, asi esta mucho mejor. Gracias
ndm (2018-08-29 19:33:18+00:00): Someone's deleted the "tent" bit!

You removed the fixme=approximate on the schools -- they were there as it wasn't clear which part of the whole was each school.
cryptickryptos (2018-08-29 21:32:06+00:00): i removed the canopy since it isn't really a building.

as for the schools, i removed the fixme tag since i have moved the node to the correct location. however i'm not sure how to draw the boundaries of elmfield secondary school since it is only located on the ground floor.
ndm (2018-08-29 22:28:40+00:00): Well, quite a few boats are buildings -- so I don't see why a canopy can't be one :-)

Good to clear up where schools really are -- signage was pretty useless.
ndm (2018-08-30 21:58:50+00:00): Think most of this one needs reverting:

    https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62102102#map=17/51.49793/-2.54306

Looks like this is drawn using out of date imagery through a "construction" area -- http://www.southwestbusiness.co.uk/sectors/construction-and-commercial-property/06102015172238-builder-taylor-wimpey-buys-land-near-uwe-bristol-for-550-new-homes

Sent to osm-edit-escalations@amazon.com but no response.
yaswap (2019-07-10 08:57:11+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for making the changes and apologies for the delayed response.

yaswap on behalf of ayushiso(inactive user)
aceman444 (2019-12-07 18:30:09+00:00): Zdravim, to naozaj cele to uzemie vratane poli a budov uprostred je obora s danielmi? Aky ma oficialny nazov? A aky je zdroj tychto udajov (rozsah obory)? Ziadny neuvadzate.
Lebo v tych lesoch je na leteckych snimkach vidiet mensie oplotene oblasti, ktore by oborami (ci vybehmi) mohli byt.
kartonage (2018-08-30 17:17:20+00:00): Hallo Mackie Mapper und willkommen bei OSM! Du hast ein Review angefordert.
//
Danke für das Eintragen eines Naturdenkmals. Allerdings hast du im Prinzip gar keinen Baum eingetragen, sondern eine Adresse. Wie man es genauer macht, kannst du hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Naturdenkmäler Für diesen Baum hier habe ich es angepasst. Aber vielleicht fallen dir ja noch weitere Naturdenkmäler in Berlin ein. Da dürften noch einige fehlen.
//
Wenn du Lust hast dich noch mehr in OSM einzubinden, kann ich dir folgendes Tutorial (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/file:Osm-tutorial.pdf) ans Herz legen. Ein Blick ins Wiki schadet auch nie (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite) und hilft einem schnell auf die Sprünge bestimmte Dinge richtig einzutragen.
//
Falls du Fragen hast, gern nachhaken. Ansonsten happy mapping!
SHARCRASH (2019-03-13 09:49:52+00:00): Pour confirmation, est-ce que vous vous basez sur le mtb:scale d'OSM ou mtb:scale:imba?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
Christouf0676 (2019-03-13 12:04:22+00:00): j'utilise le mtb:scale du lien https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
C'est vrai qu'il pourrait être "2", j'ai mis "3" si me je souviens bien à cause de quelques passages un peu abrupts. Mais je n'ai parcouru le sentier qu'une fois au mois d'août, j'étais sûrement un peu stressé et j'avais à mon retour des dizaines d'autres sentiers à tagger donc ma mémoire est sans doutes faussée. Allons pour "2" alors (au passage ça fait plaisir de dialoguer avec un autre mappeur de mtb:scale !)
SHARCRASH (2019-03-13 13:01:35+00:00): OK top! Perso je ne l'ai pas faite, j'ai fait d'autres sentiers dans le coin et je prépare mon séjour ski. Je pense qu'il vaut mieux toujours prendre la difficulté maximale de la portion (entre 2 croisements) dans une activité dangereuse pour éviter de surprendre les personnes, même si ce n'est que sur quelques endroits. Sinon il faudrait alors spécifier précisément la portion de la difficulté spécifique mais ça prends plus de travail et les personnes ne pourraient pas le remarquer si le sentier est long. C'est frustrant de se retrouver dans des sections au dessus des compétences des gens et qu'ils aient à descendre de vélo, voir rebrousser chemin si c'est des hauts niveaux. Donc laissons comme vous l'avez noté si vous n'ête spas certain. Oui ca fait palisir mais je ne suis pas du tout du coin, je suis du Luxembourg. :)
chachafish (2018-09-15 12:32:35+00:00): Howdy, thanks for your additions to the map. :)  This edit popped up as an error because the meaning of the area created is unclear. Is "General Dollar, CO" the name of a business? The name of a small town? Thanks :)
filczyk (2018-09-02 19:23:31+00:00): Potwierdzam. Ośrodek działa pod nazwą "Wesoła Stajenka".
CartoCharles (2020-03-09 15:47:24+00:00): Message envoyé à Flo63000 cartojo Esperanza36, « contributeurs principaux » de la GTMC. sur les changeset 23351597 62102799 63674385.
Hello avec hu9o on reprend la GTMC en ce moment.
Le travail est en cours donc il y aura probablement des petits changements dans la description des étapes (ajout du numéro de l'étape ?). L'idée est de finir les étapes puis les utiliser comme membres dans la relation que vous aviez décrire. Et ça veut dire la vider de ses membres actuels. Est-ce que tu es ok avec le principe et est-ce que tu as des remarques ?
Les raisons en vrac ; alors ça a l'air un peu critique comme ça mais en réalité c'est du super boulot et ces remarques sont valables pour toutes les grandes relations au final : il y a trop de membres (ça respecte pas les règles), c'est plus compliqué à maintenir, c'est incomplet, peut-être pas à jour, l'EV1 est mappée en étapes et ça fonctionne bien, les étapes sont pratiques car fonctionnelles, c'est plus pratique pour avoir qu'une étape en GPX pour ceux qui les exporte des outils comme waymarkedtrail...

Amicalement :)

Charles
Albin Gasparetto (2018-10-02 21:18:00+00:00): Coool mec !
timound (2018-10-02 21:46:31+00:00): :)
Anisa IRM-ED (2022-12-16 01:59:05+00:00): Hi, merylstreet.  Your edit looks awesome.
I delete the water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/620873168) because does not exist in maxar imagery, Bing Aerial imagery currently. if there's any update on this area and you have any other suggestions, please let me know. Thank you and happy mapping!
https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/142917399
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 01:42:21+00:00): Hi merylstreet. Your edit looks awesome, but I suggest you to delete water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/620873171) due data doesn’t exist on imagery. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143788179). Thank you.
merylstreet (2022-12-21 09:22:33+00:00): hi, you can update the map data as you see fit. as mentionned previously, I mapped these areas many years ago and it is possible there has been some contructions since then. you don't need to ask me every time, I don't live there anymore. I trust you will update based on up to date data
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-22 00:43:55+00:00): Thank you for clarifying this, the information you provide is very helpful. Please feel free to ask any other questions you may have. Happy mapping!
Ted Pottage (2018-08-29 13:03:59+00:00): Monuments do not yet appear as nodes on wheelmap, so tagging as a Memorial ensures that wheelchair users can see that it has step-free access. Also useful information for parents and grandparents with small children in pushchairs.
Dinamik (2018-08-29 13:11:19+00:00): Please, stop suppressing waterbodies names. You can easily check http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179185 . Наименование: "Итальянский пруд".
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 19:06:37+00:00): in rgis SPb labeled name formed from toponim and type object. this not valid source.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 19:07:33+00:00): valid source see in comment for changeset.
Dinamik (2018-08-30 05:55:36+00:00): Your hypothesis seems to be incorrect: there are waterbodies in rgis base with names which don't contain "type object" words. In any case, these two sources don't contradict each other: both of them say about "Итальянский пруд", not "Французский пруд" or "Английский пруд".
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 14:36:45+00:00): proper name(hydronim) of the pond "Итальянский", but not "Итальянский пруд".
Dinamik (2018-08-31 19:53:41+00:00): 
Can you tolerate, that common name can be different from short name, which is used in catalogues in such form for purposes of alphabetical order and for purposes of automatisation of object analysis? Here we see, that normal name (which is normally used, for example, in rgis) is a little bit longer, than short name. It is not an issue.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-31 23:01:43+00:00): No. This is nonsense. There is a toponym, which is a proper name, it CAN also have a generic word as an integral part, but this is a rarity in the Russian language, exceptions. And there is a compound name used for signatures on maps, on plates, in unspecialized, common, dictionaries, etc., which includes a toponym and a generic word. And according to the standards for the purposes of cartography and record keeping, the generic word is placed BEFORE the toponym. And this rule was introduced by Russian topographers and cartographers in the nineteenth century. And it is with the goal that there is no confusion, where the type of the geographic object, and where the toponym.

In the same RGIS SPb, if you open the tab "ПОРЯДОК И ВИДИМОСТЬ СЛОЕВ" and enable signatures for the "Водные объекты" layer, you will see that almost all waterbodies and most waterays will be signed without a generic word (but with their locality for some). Unfortunately, the RGIS is not a specialized source for toponyms, and therefore they also allow inaccuracies in their attitude. For example, the "Внутренний канал" they signed with an error, without the "канал" which in this case is part of the toponym.

The OSM, since it is primarily a data set, must display the real situation, transferring data from the database to those who will use them, not in a distorted form and do not decide for others how to display them. If you paid attention, then I use name:postfix tag to indicate the position of the generic word, if it is not part of the toponym. This is important for those who will create a style of map that relies on the natural position of the generic word. At the same time, we have no right to interfere with those who want to create a style based on standards and traditions.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-31 23:20:14+00:00): "Внутренний канал" on the RGIS: http://rgis.spb.ru/map/ShowPlace.aspx?id=179460
Dinamik (2018-09-01 19:53:22+00:00): see comments here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62121918
EneaSuper (2018-08-29 16:42:54+00:00): Ciao, mi permetto di contestare queste modifiche. 
Trattasi della Strada di servizio AMIU, costruita appositamente per permettere ai camion dell'azienda di giungere alla discarica di Scarpino, in sostituzione del precedente percorso di Via Cristo di Marmo, e per ciò riservata unicamente a loro. 
In passato erano presenti delle sbarre ai limiti della strada (che oramai credo siano scomparse) ma dubito fortemente che i divieti siano mutati.
Credo per tanto che si debba tornare al tag precedente, e cambiarla da "residential" a "service", soprattutto ora che la discarica è stata riaperta.
Ale_Zena_IT (2018-08-30 06:54:27+00:00): Il 21 luglio la strada presentava il cartello di divieto d'accesso ai mezzi normali come si può vedere da mia foto su Mapillary    https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=44.43358298416885&lng=8.861287213720288&z=20&pKey=6x_MyOOwhjRh5iMvA9HpRA&focus=photo&x=0.4908847887778801&y=0.4841959748939598&zoom=0     Se l'utente non ha conoscenza diretta di un cambiamento domani eseguo revert
EneaSuper (2018-08-30 07:45:46+00:00): Perfetto, lascio fare a te. Non dimenticarti i tag che ho proposto 😉
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 19:01:03+00:00): This member corrupt the names. War edits. Mechanical edits.
Dinamik (2018-08-30 05:54:39+00:00): You comments writing programm may be corrected: I've already gave comment about this object: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62103990.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:37:57+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:13:56+00:00): see comments here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62103990
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-29 19:02:06+00:00): This member corrupt the names. War edits. Mechanical edits.
Dinamik (2018-08-30 05:54:57+00:00): Please, describe the problem with this edit.
Артём Крюковский (2018-08-30 15:37:49+00:00): Edits for render.
Dinamik (2018-08-31 20:13:05+00:00): see comments here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62103990
Miftah IRM-ED (2021-05-06 02:27:55+00:00): hi SterylMreep, 
i deleted your waterbody based on the maxar (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/620876225), thank you
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 01:29:55+00:00): Hi merylstreet. Your edit looks awesome, but I suggest you to delete water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/620876210) due data doesn’t exist on imagery. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143789622). Thank you.
merylstreet (2022-12-21 09:22:37+00:00): hi, you can update the map data as you see fit. as mentionned previously, I mapped these areas many years ago and it is possible there has been some contructions since then. you don't need to ask me every time, I don't live there anymore. I trust you will update based on up to date data
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-22 00:43:18+00:00): Thank you for clarifying this, the information you provide is very helpful. Please feel free to ask any other questions you may have. Happy mapping!
Commodoortje (2018-08-29 18:07:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
EneaSuper (2018-08-29 16:40:28+00:00): Ciao, mi permetto di contestare queste modifiche.
Trattasi della Strada di servizio AMIU, costruita appositamente per permettere ai camion dell'azienda di giungere alla discarica di Scarpino, in sostituzione del precedente percorso di Via Cristo di Marmo, e per ciò riservata unicamente a loro.
In passato erano presenti delle sbarre ai limiti della strada (che oramai credo siano scomparse) ma dubito fortemente che i divieti siano mutati.

Credo per tanto che si debba tornare al tag precedente, e cambiarla da "residential" a "service", soprattutto ora che la discarica è stata riaperta.
viloan (2018-08-29 13:28:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
EneaSuper (2018-08-29 16:34:53+00:00): Ciao, ti sei dimenticato almeno un tag fondamentale per questo tipo di edifici. Prendi spunto da questa villa di San Quirico:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399195254
belinux (2018-08-30 12:41:22+00:00): Ciao, ti ringrazio per la segnalazione ma nella villa di San Quirico vedo diversi tag aggiunti.
Intendi historic? Oppure l'official_name?
EneaSuper (2018-08-31 08:07:47+00:00): In questo caso va bene solo "historic=", in quanto non so quale possa essere il nome completo della villa, e se esso esista veramente.
Frans S (2018-12-04 18:44:10+00:00): Hi Taijaa, Thanks for contributing to this project. A remark. During reviewing of tasks I noticed that you did not square a building . Please use the S key to square your buildings during mapping. Thank You
Supaplex (2019-02-07 02:55:23+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
3vivekb (2018-09-02 20:11:47+00:00): Good work.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62106003
s_sheldon (2019-11-05 14:15:32+00:00): Way: 620888106 should be highway=footway or highway=path as it is too narrow for vehicles, as well as the nearby ways
Hjart (2018-08-30 08:30:48+00:00): Hi
I have added building tags, so that these buildings will render on the map
Leno$M (2018-08-29 16:37:27+00:00): Creo que no se debe usar landuse=residential sobre la ciudad entera
muralito (2018-08-29 19:26:42+00:00): Hola Lena.

Yo no he visto ese criterio.
¿Donde encontraste esa definicion?
Leno$M (2018-08-29 20:55:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:landuse%3Dresidential

En la sección de "Cuando no usarlo" argumenta que no se debe utilizar como etiqueta extra de unidades administrativas urbanas.
Tengo entendido que landuse=residential es más apropiado para marcar zonas residenciales dentro de la ciudad.
muralito (2018-08-30 18:16:28+00:00): Es que no esta mapeado como extra de unidad administrativa, esta mapeada como polígono solo para el área residencial, y de hecho los limites de Concordia como cuidad admin_level=8 aun no están mapeados.
Metrophil (2018-08-29 14:17:10+00:00): about*
atcomapper (2018-08-29 14:42:45+00:00): Øh, hvor var lige diskussionen om denne import?
Du har lavet en hel masse dupletter, blandt andet hele vejen rundt langs Djurslands Kyst, hvor jeg ved tidligere lejlighed har tilføjet strandnumre.
Hvad er planen for vedligeholdelse af denne data? Strandnumrene bliver jo opdateret fra tid til anden, og det kunne blive decideret farligt hvis OSM indeholder forældet data.