piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2015-09-22 10:13:32+00:00): Hi - just noticed a few forest tracks named "Forest Track" here such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316666926 .  Just for info - if there isn't a name signed for something you don't need to make one up; it's perfectly OK to leave things without names if they don't have one.
Anyway - hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help.  Any questions please don't hesitate to get in touch.
sladen (2015-08-06 10:35:16+00:00): This changeset nuked the FR->UK cycle-routeing relation with no obvious explanation.  I would what else got broken.
Nicolas Boonaert (2015-08-06 12:29:09+00:00): I'll check out where the cycle-routeing is broken. I'll fix accordingly to the new terminal in Freight (Terminal 2015 is used since June 8th) as well as check for Passenger terminal.

Let me know if you want to help.
muralito (2014-12-10 21:33:50+00:00): No es correcto quitar el nombre. El nombre corresponde que esté.
EkiZ (2014-12-10 21:59:24+00:00): Lo hice porque aparecía el nombre duplicado. Ahora lo corregí poniendo la descripción "Zona residencial de...". Gracias
muralito (2014-12-10 22:19:04+00:00): Gracias a vos. Igual tene en cuenta que lleva el mismo nombre, porque el boundary=administrative con admin_level=8 y el nodo representan lo mismo (con distinto nivel de detalle), y corresponden que esten ambos.
Lo que seria mejor es que el mapa renderice a ambos, pero eso es problema del render y no de los datos.
Capaz que para eso habria que hacer dos relaciones iguales y una solo con el landuse=residential, pero igual es mapear mas para evitar que el render cometa el error. Al estar los datos bien, la responsabilidad de dibujar bien el mapa tiene que estar del lado del render.
muralito (2014-12-10 22:19:59+00:00): (que el mapa no renderice ambos quise decir)
parukhin (2015-04-26 18:54:04+00:00): Коллега, подскажите, где вы тут увидели ошибочные POI?
Верните деревья назад, плиз.
ModIboR (2015-04-27 18:01:02+00:00): Читайте внимательно описание в wiki.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural=tree

Отмечаются "Отдельно стоящие или примечательные деревья"
Но ни как не аллеи...
parukhin (2015-04-27 18:58:01+00:00): Покажите, пожалуйста, где здесь аллеи https://maps.yandex.ru/-/CVSoY2L1
Ну и если считаете, что вместо аллей неверно нарисованы отдельные деревья, не забывайте нарисовать аллеи после удаления деревьев.
ModIboR (2015-04-27 20:49:17+00:00): Покажите, пожалуйста, где здесь "отдельно стоящие или примечательные деревья"?

https://yandex.ru/images/search?text=отдельно+стоящее+дерево

Если считаете, что я БЕЗОСНОВАТЕЛЬНО удалил ошибочные POI, которые вы (или кто-то другой) указал, из-за неправильного понимания фразы "отдельно стоящие или примечательные деревья" - обратитесь к администратору (модератору) данного ресурса.
P.S. Более отвечать на ваши комментарии не намерен.
parukhin (2015-04-27 22:59:56+00:00): Посмотрите английский раздел и поймите, что в начале там "A single tree", а "lone" всего лишь "often", а не "always". 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
Модераторов в проекте нет.
dforsi (2014-12-10 22:26:00+00:00): Questa way non sembra utile perché non ha delle etichette "fisiche" e perché c'è già questa http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/216684563 intorno al centro abitato
Vuoi cancellare la 316676131 e modificare quella esistente se non ti sembra giusta?
opottone (2016-12-30 22:48:11+00:00): Looking at NaPTAN database I only saw 9100BUCKNHM, not 9100BUCKNHM0 nor 9100BUCKNHM1. Is this some standard extension? Or perhaps old data?
Pink Duck (2016-12-31 10:41:29+00:00): The former is the stop code area reference, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4264945/history

The latter two look to be a zero-based suffix to describe the individual stop points.

Those tags are from around two years ago so the NaPTAN DB may have changed since.
opottone (2017-01-01 06:04:29+00:00): NaPTAN could have changed since, or this could be some nonstandard way to distinguish the different platforms. Anyway, I assume you don't object if I change both codes to 9100BUCKNHM.
Pink Duck (2017-01-01 11:43:39+00:00): I would recommend checking with the current NaPTAN data first, but I don't mind.
EdLoach (2014-12-10 16:11:08+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

Are you able to add more details to this node, such as the name, religion, denomination and address? The imagery source noted for your changeset looks like you've placed the place of worship on one half of a semi-detached house, so the extra details will help.
dforsi (2014-12-10 22:29:10+00:00): Hai disegnato un rettangolo ma non hai detto cosa rappresenta nel mondo reale, dalle foto sembra che tu debba aggiungere  amenity=garden a questo.
naoliv (2014-12-10 17:49:25+00:00): Alberto, esse link que conectava a Avenida Brasil com a Rua José de Moura, não existe mais?
naoliv (2014-12-10 17:50:12+00:00): E por favor, comente as edições que você faz. Isso é importante para que os outros mapeadores entendam o que você está modificando.
albertossilva (2014-12-10 17:53:00+00:00): Olá, boa tarde, nunca existiu isso lá não. Hoje naquela esquina é uma concessionária automotiva.
naoliv (2014-12-10 18:05:52+00:00): É que pela imagem do Bing existe a ligação: http://binged.it/1x2LKcD
Repare que tem uma faixa para quem deseja fazer a conversão direta para a direita.
albertossilva (2014-12-10 18:16:39+00:00): Recriei como um Link.
albertossilva (2014-12-10 17:55:04+00:00): Alça de acesso ao terminal rodoviária, area de embarque e desembarque.
albertossilva (2014-12-10 17:56:49+00:00): Criando a escola.
kulitcantik (2014-12-10 22:57:28+00:00): this is my location guys http://www.kulitcantikalami.info/
robert (2014-12-14 14:50:47+00:00): I'm afraid I had to revert chis changeset (in my changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27459560) because it deleted several objects including Grace Avenue (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55129004) and a footway (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47521566).

We also don't tend to put very temporary features into OSM, so I'm not totally sure I see the worth in adding temporary oneway systems unless you are definitely going to remember to come & change them back when they're over.
skyper (2015-02-10 23:51:10+00:00): Lieber hurdygurdyman

turn:lanes beziehen sich auf alle Fahrspuren und nicht nur auf die für Motorfahrzeuge. Deine Änderungen haben an Stellen mit Fahrradspur also nur schaden angerichtet. Die Zusatzstile in JOSM hätte Dich auch gewarnt, aber Potlatch2 versteht davon nur Bahnhof.
skyper (2015-02-11 00:18:18+00:00): Naja, war von mir auch missverständlich getaggt mit einem leeren Wert als letzten Wert. Werde in Zukunft wohl doch eher nicht so faul sein und "none" tippen.
hurdygurdyman (2015-02-11 09:29:36+00:00): Hallo skyper,
Danke für den Hinweis. Ich denke, dass mein angerichteter "Schaden" im Verhältnis zu den beseitigten Fehlern überschaubar bleibt. JOSM mag hier zwar hilfreich sein, ab für das schnelle großflächige Abarbeiten von mit Overpass-Turbo analysierten Fehlern hat Potlatch schon Vorteile. Ich werde meine damaligen Änderungen noch einmal nachverfolgen im Bezug auf Fahrradspuren bei Bedarf korrigieren.
skyper (2015-02-11 14:21:53+00:00): Im Stühlinger bin ich schon am korrigieren und da ich ja die Systematik verstanden habe ist es auch nicht schwer. Wie schon gesagt, war auch nicht schön getaggt, aber Deine Overpass-Query bedarf da wohl einer Verbesserung.
hurdygurdyman (2015-02-11 17:30:23+00:00): War nicht meine  Overpass-Query. Bekommst Post.
KKS (2015-09-30 20:06:05+00:00): Привіт, біля фіз-хіму там ізольована service. По супутнику я взагалі там дороги не бачу, можеш злінкувати її?
Kilkenni (2015-10-01 07:48:47+00:00): Ти маєш на увазі ту, яка на даху конференц-залу? Що означає злінкувати? Мені самому не зрозуміло, як туди потрапляти, тому що вона дійсно ізольована, але вона є :)
KKS (2015-10-01 10:37:05+00:00): Ну якщо так можна назвати то да. Там по гуглю її навіть не видно, дах як дах. Я думав то щось напівтонельне під тим дахом.
Kilkenni (2015-10-01 16:08:44+00:00): Ні, це дах. З правого боку рампа для в'їзду.
user_5359 (2014-12-10 19:28:25+00:00): Wenn das nur ein Geldautomat ist, wäre ein amenity=atm richtig, wenn es doch eine Bank ist, dann ist der Name falsch!
DaveF (2019-06-24 11:53:49+00:00): Any chance you can sort out this internal building mess. You've created at least three entities, none of which align.
guanchzhou (2014-12-12 07:03:43+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Подскажите, пожалуйста, зачем вы передвинули совсем немного пути метро у Ладожской и удалили POI судебного участка на Индустриальном 10к1? Судебный участок, как показывает сайт суда http://www.mirsud.spb.ru/catalog/105 все ещё на месте.
guanchzhou (2014-12-20 18:14:57+00:00): за неделю ответа не получено. откатываю данную правку.
trigpoint (2014-12-10 20:43:35+00:00): You seem to have included the car park in the chip shop building, I am pretty sure it has a name that is not "Fish & Chips", but can't remember what it is actually called.
It should be tagged with cuisine=fish_and_chips.
trigpoint (2014-12-10 21:05:49+00:00): You seem to have overlapped the school boundary and wrapped it around the building.
You should draw the outline of the grounds and the building as separate ways. Mapping is not a challenge to see how much you can draw without taking your pen off the paper.
The building and grounds can be joined by a relation should you wish.
robert (2014-12-14 14:53:06+00:00): Are you sure about the naming here? OS Locator seems to disagre with you http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=641665
Pink Duck (2014-12-14 17:56:49+00:00): I suspect that was an editing mistake, since it is Royal Terrace from Royal Parade North to the top, with addressing suggesting that to the right of that it is Royal Plain.
tyr_asd (2015-02-07 17:59:26+00:00): I've downgraded the road LS162 over the Kreiter Sattel to "unclassified" again, because it is a very quiet road which doesn't really have a connecting function. It is also very narrow around the top of the saddle.

(Not every LS/SP road has to be tagged as tertiary! And not every tertiary road needs to have a LS/SP ref.)

*Eventually* the remaining part of LS162 (from LS19) with the short piece of communal road to Klughammer could be considered a tertiary road (as it connects the hamlet to the main road and town), but as the hamlet is so little I'd leave it as is.
urk (2026-07-13 14:57:56+00:00): Hallo Chenshi, ich hatte dich schon mal zu Straßennamen im Umfeld von Bederkesa angeschrieben. Ich versuche es nochmal: Du hast damals u.a. auch die Namen Wiesenhof, Hof Im Hüllen und Hof Zuversicht als Straßennamen eingetragen. Als Quelle hast du Bing angegeben, ich wüsste jedoch nicht wo die in Bing Aerial Image zu finden sind. Ausgeschildert sind diese jedenfalls so nicht und stehen auch nicht im behördlichen Straßenverzeichnis. Allerdings findet man genau diese Namen an den Stellen auch in Google Maps. 
Hast du damals von google abgeschrieben oder google danach von OSM?
tiguillom (2014-12-10 21:26:05+00:00): duplicate of Pharmacicle 31 bis rue mademoiselle?
Aglis IRM-ED (2022-12-16 07:28:23+00:00): Hi eXmajor, thank you for your contribution. I deleted this object (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/40864062) because this object doesn't exist in Maxar Imagery or other imagery. thank you and happy mapping.
lezurdis (2014-12-12 12:23:56+00:00): Viva,

Adicionaste os horários o que é bom, más para os programas poderem usar esta informação, o formato é fixo e, como muitas vezes, definido em inglês :

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples  

É pena colocar a informação se ninguém vai poder usar-la. Deixo-te ver como se usa o opening_hours, se tiveres qualquer duvida é só pedir e tentarei ajudar-te.

Boa continuação
DaxServer (2016-12-07 16:57:02+00:00): Hi, Andrey! The tag name:en is just redundant. Let me know, I'll remove it.
andygol (2016-12-07 20:10:29+00:00): Hi,  Srihari.

Please leave it as it is. 

I propose consider `name` tag as fallback along with real name which should be put in `name:xx`. Based on this statement `name` tag is not always in English, it could be in any local languages.
DaxServer (2016-12-08 05:22:20+00:00): Sure, Andrey. I'll leave it as it is. Thanks!
SomeoneElse (2014-12-11 14:46:40+00:00): I'd be very surprised if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316734399 could still be described as "landuse=railway" - any railway there has surely long gone.  Have you got any evidence that it hasn't?
SomeoneElse (2014-12-15 11:10:40+00:00): Also are the tracks really still in place on the bridge east of Kings Clipstone http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43893968/history#map=17/53.17820/-1.09369 ?  I'd be very surprised if they were.
SomeoneElse (2014-12-11 09:45:47+00:00): I notice that you have again changed a number of roads from unclassified to tertiary without comment.  Can you please explain the source and the logic for this change?  I'm familiar with the area and have walked from Sedgbrook to Allington a number of times.   From the point of view of someone actually walking along the road, it absolutely doesn't look like a tertiary road.
R0bst3r (2015-01-12 12:19:49+00:00): Hallo Wallo, guter Versuch, aber passt nicht ganz. Einfach halten! Kleine Hilfe: blog.openstreetmap.de/wp-uploads//2014/11/Erfassen-von-Fahrspuren-mit-Richtungsangabe1.pdf
SomeoneElse (2014-12-16 00:13:33+00:00): I'm guessing that Ferndale http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196564791/history#map=19/53.13681/-1.19433 was never actually surveyed.  I walked past the end yesterday, and it's definitely a residential road.  I'll fix it.
Polarbear (2015-10-25 12:49:30+00:00): sport=gaelic_football is deprecated. The correct tagging is sport=gaelic_games + gaelic_games:hurling=yes
gaelic_games:football=yes
etc.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dgaelic_games
SomeoneElse (2014-12-16 00:34:01+00:00): As also mentioned in http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/283774 , it's somewhat unlikely that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316740087 is landuse=railway, as I suspect that there is no longer a railway here.  Did you actually go and have a look, or are you just relying on the out-of-date Bing imagery?
SomeoneElse (2014-12-16 00:38:45+00:00): What evidence do you have that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316741487 has the tracks still in place?  The Bing imagery suggests "abandoned" rather than "disused".
syskenjp (2014-12-11 00:29:31+00:00): 一部地物位置調整
naoliv (2014-12-11 11:30:59+00:00): Regis, qual o motivo de estar apagando estes caminhos? Eles definem o bairro de Aparecida em Santos.
naoliv (2014-12-11 11:33:55+00:00): E por favor, comente as modificações que você faz. Isso é útil para que os outros mapeadores entendam o que você está fazendo.
RegisAJ (2014-12-11 14:06:44+00:00): Olá naoliv. Os limites do bairro de Aparecida já estavam definidos através de uma Área de Vizinhança, assim como de vários outros bairros já estão também. Portanto, não era necessário definí-lo novamente com uma Linha de Limite Administrativo. Cada vez que entro no OSM faço dezenas de inserções e modificações. Comentar cada uma delas é impossível, mas tentarei fazer comentários resumidos.
naoliv (2014-12-11 14:18:11+00:00): Na verdade o que define bairros (e cidades, estados, etc) são os limites administrativos e não as áreas com place=suburb ou place=neighbourhood
Nesse caso precisaria então arrumar todas as áreas que estão como place=neighbourhood para se tornarem limites administrativos.
Eu vou ver se arrumo isso mais tarde.
RegisAJ (2014-12-11 18:54:07+00:00): Concordo totalmente que o correto é usar linha de limite administrativo para bairros. Mas  áreas de vizinhança para definição de bairros já existiam e então deduzi, equivocadamente, que isso era um padrão adotado pelos mapeadores da região. Vou arrumar.
naoliv (2014-12-11 19:04:21+00:00): Pelo que eu vi, basta inserir boundary=administrative + admin_level=10 nessas áreas já existentes. Com isso já estaria marcando um bairro (mantendo o nome e outros valores já existentes).
Ideal seria também, se possível, convertê-las em relação e compartilhar o caminho delas.
AlaskaDave (2014-12-11 03:06:23+00:00): This comment is from the one I saved previously. It should read: Adding some POIs in my neighborhood of Chang Phuak. source=Bing, survey, GPS
Cheese Head (2014-12-11 03:23:02+00:00): 1. Hardee's was demolished.
2. Mobil gas station closed and will be demolished.
3. Subway closed in Mobil gas station closed.
syskenjp (2014-12-25 06:51:37+00:00): コメントはどこに書けばいいの
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-12-12 13:22:06+00:00): Proszę nie zmieniać nazw miejscowości wg swojego uznania. Ta miejscowość nazywa się Chełmno i tak nawet jest napisane na tablicach przy drodze.
mavl (2014-12-11 16:00:25+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Почему такой небольшой магазин обозначен как shop=supermarket?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316752124
mavl (2014-12-18 15:04:40+00:00): В wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dsupermarket) написано, что shop=supermarket - это крупный универсальный магазин самообслуживания. А площадь этого магазина всего 241 кв. м.
Обозначение магазинов также обсуждалось на форуме (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=9465&p=1).

Магазин переобозначен на shop=convenience.
~Jhellico (2014-12-12 07:43:40+00:00): Навіщо малювати круглі будинки, якщо вони такими не є?
ToniE (2014-12-11 14:02:55+00:00): Hallo whellmut,

hat der Kreitmayer wirklich dicht gemacht?

Hier in Ottobrunn ist da garnichts durch die Presse gegangen. Im Oktober bin ich das letzte Mal mit dem Rad dran vorbei gefahren (von Solalinden kommend).
Mir war nichts aufgefallen.

Gruß,
Toni
whellmut (2014-12-11 14:34:10+00:00): Ja leider. Auch der Biergarten ist schon seit Spätsommer dicht. Angeblich soll im Mai 2015 mit einem neuen Pächter wieder geöffnet werden.
Schöne Adventstage noch und viele Grüße
Walter
PT-53 (2020-08-11 12:47:34+00:00): Hallo Win32netsky,
Du hast an dieser Brücke
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316775086/history
das Merkmal
maxheight=unsingned
eingetragen. Im OSM-Inspector wird dazu ein Hinweis "layer: 	maxheight" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=highways&lon=9.01346&lat=47.90173&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=maxheight

Meintest Du vielleicht
maxheight=default    ?
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxheight?uselang=de

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-08-12 06:55:24+00:00): Und, berichtigst Du dann diese Einträge?

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-08-23 08:10:34+00:00): Hallo Win32netsky, 
berichtigst Du Deine Einträge noch?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-08-12 05:23:13+00:00): Hallo Win32netsky,
Du hast an dieser Unterführung
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316775774
das Merkmal
maxheight=unsingned
eingetragen. Im OSM-Inspector wird dazu ein Hinweis "layer: maxheight" angezeigt.

Meintest Du vielleicht
maxheight=default ?
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxheight?uselang=de

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-08-12 05:24:42+00:00): Das gleiche hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316776028/history
PT-53 (2020-08-23 08:11:17+00:00): Hallo Win32netsky,
berichtigst Du Deine Einträge noch?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-06 08:23:38+00:00): Hallo Win32netsky,
berichtigst Du Deine Einträge noch?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-27 07:34:19+00:00): Hallo Win32netsky, 
keine Reaktion oder Antwort.
Super
muralito (2015-01-20 19:48:26+00:00): La restriccion de giro es no doblar a la izquierda, asi que reverti ese detalle.
EkiZ (2015-01-21 01:22:23+00:00): Perfecto, gracias.
Skippern (2014-12-11 20:34:07+00:00): Quando crescendo dados no banco de dados, favor não adicionar areas com somente o etiquete area=yes, este significando nada. Ajuda melhor se voce pode tracer os ruas, limites de areas residenciais, industriais ou comerciais, ponto do ônibus, posto gasolina entre outro.
Miguel Brunoro (2014-12-12 12:50:57+00:00): entao, como é um andamento, minha metodologia inicial era demarcar as edificações primeiramente, e depois classifica-las, visto que minha visita de campo neste local é dia 21 e farei uma investigação aprofundada, enquanto isso estou demarcando os edificios.
Skippern (2014-12-12 14:43:51+00:00): uso somente area=yes e errado e voce tem risco que algum poder apaga-los. Se e edifícios, voce pode comecar com building=yes ate voce tem dados mais profundo
naoliv (2014-12-11 12:58:34+00:00): Jayro, você apagou uma linha que definia a separação dos limites de Maranguape e Maracanaú.
Tenha mais cuidado ao apagar objetos que possam parecer estranhos ou sem sentido. Geralmente possuem um papel definido no mapa.
Monitor (2014-12-12 07:06:28+00:00): когда едешь мимо Курилово на дороге есть знаки начало и конец населенного пункта?
deepone (2014-12-12 09:28:49+00:00): нет, там на севере участок с нежилыми домами, что то типа сенохранилищ
deepone (2014-12-12 09:31:50+00:00): еще 1 момент, я не знаю как правильно нарисовать - луговая улица на юге заканчивается тупиком, там на грунтовку выехать нельзя, выезд есть только западнее
deepone (2014-12-12 09:32:24+00:00): еще 1 момент, я не знаю как правильно нарисовать - луговая улица на юге заканчивается тупиком, там на грунтовку выехать нельзя, перегорожено, выезд есть только западнее
Monitor (2014-12-12 09:35:12+00:00): тогда place=hamlet не должен пересекать дорогу. Обычно территория ферм не входит в состав населенного пункта.
Monitor (2014-12-12 09:38:14+00:00): Луговая перегорожена блоком/забор/ворота ?
deepone (2014-12-12 10:30:33+00:00): Там забор и ворота, видимо кто то купил 2 участка земли с разных сторон дороги, и он и перекрыл дорогу. Перед развилкой есть знаки прямо-тупик и стрелка направо, правда они больше похожи на самодельные. В любом случае там немного западнее по грунтовке надо объезжать. А фермы на севере наверно надо отрезать тогда.
aceman444 (2014-12-14 22:59:29+00:00): Dobry den, tu ste zduplikovali cestu (241016193). Prosim opravte to.
saintam1 (2014-12-11 21:22:56+00:00): Добре дошли в OpenStreetMap!

Искам да Ви попитам дали има банкомат към банката. 

Мерси за приноса. Давайте в същия дух!
RicoElectrico (2017-03-23 15:59:28+00:00): This should be reverted. There's no basis for these street names, it's an automated edit.
Myazyk (2017-03-27 17:54:32+00:00): This is a translation into Ukrainian.
RicoElectrico (2017-03-27 18:07:01+00:00): I know this. But I can't imagine how that could be useful. Are people supposed to use it on addresses, use when getting/giving directions or finding their way (on a street which only has Polish name anyway)?

These names are not sanctioned in any way. In fact, there *could* be bilingual street names in municipalities with >=20% of language minorities, but to this day there are none (there are bilingual place names, but currently no Ukrainian ones)
RicoElectrico (2017-03-27 18:07:52+00:00): Correction, should be:

(on a street which only has Polish name on a signpost anyway)
AkuAnakTimur (2014-12-11 16:53:18+00:00): Sorry, it should be said that: do not put incorrect data into OSM
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-21 21:29:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316823427 - rowów raczej nie rysujemy jako obrysy - zaznacza się tylko oś.
ubahnverleih (2014-12-11 17:52:01+00:00): Du bist ein Held!
*Martin* (2015-12-15 09:52:37+00:00): Ahoj Muguel,

Chcalim kolko mapujes :-). Len ta chcem trochu poopravit v sposobe pomenovania objektov. Napr. pri amenity=cinema sa do name nedava slovko "kino" pretoze amenity=cinema to implikuje. Tj. ziadne name="kino Centrum" ale iba vlastne meno, tj. name=Centrum. Mnemotechnicka pomocka: Ako sa vola to kino? To kino sa vola "Centrum".

V Michalovciach vidim plno takychto "duplicitnych" nazvov.

Vynimky mozu byt ak sa nieco neda vyjadrit inymi tagmi, napr. "Zakladna umelecka skola", alebo ak samotne vlastne meno vyzera blbo, napr. ak by name="Zemplinske muzeum" bolo len name="Zemplinske".

Bolo by pekne precistit tie nazvy.
miguel111 (2015-12-15 11:00:18+00:00): OK. Opravené.
*Martin* (2015-12-15 14:26:56+00:00): Vdaka. Ale je toho viac, napr. "VUB Banka", "Vinaren Stary Sud", "Vinaren Pivnicka", "Zlatnictvo Opal", "Hotel Druzba", "Trznica", "Autobusova stanica", "Nabytok Kostrej", asi aj "Cintorin Cervenej Armady". podozrive je aj "ihrisko s umelou travou" - na to je tag surface, nie name. Dalej "materska skola" - na to je amenity=kindergarten. atd. Neviem co vsetko je tvoje :)