piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tekim (2020-07-24 22:17:38+00:00): From a legal standpoint, I think fire trucks have some exemption (you would know better than I).  Sounds like what you are looking for is a tag that indicates that it would be physically possible to drive a large, heavy truck on a given road. 

The hgv tag seems to also be about legal access rather than physical suitability.  

I don't have any suggested tag or tags for what you are attempting show, but I can search the wiki, and we could perhaps ask on the tagging mail list.
phidauex (2020-07-24 22:19:40+00:00): According to this interesting reading, CO does have general exceptions to the usual weight limits for emergency vehicles. However, I think nearly every type of fire engine, even large type 1s, will be less than 86000 lbs by design. In the document there are a few examples of aerial platforms with a tiller on a third group of axles that could exceed 86000, but I'd pay good money to see someone try to make it up a dirt road in one... 

https://www.fama.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/1514564588_5a466bec19c41.pdf

Weight limits at those high levels can impact even dirt roads which may be insufficiently shored, or have culverts to crush, or even just soil to liquify. I've had to move some substation transformers at ~120k lbs, and the gymnastics needed to move them is quite complex.
rsavoye (2020-07-24 22:21:02+00:00): Thinking about it, I think I'm just going to delete it from any highway I added it to as incorrect.
rsavoye (2020-07-24 22:23:12+00:00): I think the key part of the definition was the number of axles in the vehicle, which rules out logging or fire trucks.
tekim (2020-07-25 14:59:57+00:00): Rob, I appreciate your willingness to consider other viewpoints.  I do think the information in your source file is valuable, it is just that lhv=* may not be the right tag.  Perhaps truck=yes, or maxweightrating=<what ever is legal in Colorado>, or maxweightrating:hgv=* may be more appropriate to model the meaning of the original source data. 
Mike
user_5359 (2017-12-19 05:09:33+00:00): Please note that the address is not part of the property, but from the main building.
user_5359 (2017-12-19 05:10:56+00:00): What I forgot to say first of all: Welcome to OSM!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:52:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
ToeBee (2018-01-03 08:01:14+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You are adding some excellent details to the map! I was just looking over some changesets that mention Pokemon Go in the comments. Some of them are... well... "sub-par". But yours are great. If you haven't seen it already, please check out the wiki if you aren't sure how to map something. wiki.osm.org. Happy mapping!
ToeBeeFixit (2017-12-19 04:37:38+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54664956, 54664998, 54665033, 54665069, 54665117, 54665270, 54665341, 54665357, 54665431, 54665527, 54670398, 54741847, 54741929, 54741959, 54742101, 54742142, 54742188, 54743271, 54743367, 54743569, 54743613, 54743718, 54743741, 54743899, 54743987, 54744023, 54744093, 54744287, 54744401, 54744409, 54744419, 54744425, 54744429, 54744476, 54744554.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:48:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
viloan (2017-12-19 04:25:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Lembap10 (2017-12-20 00:02:22+00:00): thank you for the fix, i have noticed a lot more vandalism coming from the Prior Lake city, this was done by Masonclem03 who messed up streets and i cant find a fix
I would recommend banning him please
ToeBeeFixit (2017-12-19 05:32:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54749095 where the changeset comment is: Reverting intentional vandalism
ToeBeeFixit (2017-12-19 05:32:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54749095 where the changeset comment is: Reverting intentional vandalism
ToeBeeFixit (2017-12-19 05:32:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54749095 where the changeset comment is: Reverting intentional vandalism
user_5359 (2017-12-19 12:17:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You merge to address information to one node (see http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/596624326). Can you please checks this?

If you need help you are welcome!
quiet7 (2017-12-19 15:45:44+00:00): Fixed
ToeBeeFixit (2017-12-19 05:32:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54749095 where the changeset comment is: Reverting intentional vandalism
SomeoneElse (2017-12-27 12:44:51+00:00): Hello,
Just to let you know, OSM's Data Working Group got a complaint about the duplication in this area (which you may also have seen mentioned in the talk-us post at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-December/018216.html ), so thank you for tiding up some of the problems here.   The mapper who made these original edits is long gone from OSM, so what remains is largely a "data tidying exercise".

I've deleted the main duplicate Shasta-Trinity NF way http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=487220873 (the original http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/70010/ hasn't been edited for 12 months as so is presumably OK).  I'll also look at the smaller duplicates added by http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47829109 .

It'd be great if other people could have a look at some of the duplicates highlighted within the https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2017-December/018216.html list post with a view to removing duplicates in the other ones too.

There's also scope to map the landuse etc. within the national forest boundaries such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418301052 better, but that will need more local mappers with local knowledge.  Currently in that example there's only http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64298706 , which is another import.  It's clear for example that the trees in the imagery at http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=17/40.61757/-122.94615 don't match what has been imported.

So thanks again, and if you've got any questions about this (or anything else) please drop an email to the DWG via data@osmfoundation.org.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (DWG member and occasional hiker in Northern California)
user_5359 (2017-12-19 12:04:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:47:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
viloan (2017-12-19 05:09:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GOwin (2017-12-31 04:19:30+00:00): Awesome work with your recent edits. Thank you.

I am aware of the limitations of the Maps.Me app, and I'm pretty sure your use of the "viewpoint" tag for the features are temporary.

The relevant tags are:

* Aluminium and Glass is craft=glaziery
* Tire Wizard - shop=tyres
* Cebuana Pera Padala - this is a money service. Is the establishment primarily a pawnshop? shop=pawnbroker; amenity=money_transfer
* Motor rewinding shop = electrical; repair=yes
* Ukay-ukay - shop=clothes; second_hand=yes
* Paint - shop=hardware or shop=doityourself
* Sign maker = what kind?

More references:
* https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:shop
* https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:craft
GOwin (2017-12-31 04:22:02+00:00): By the way, some local mappers are hoping to organize an informal get together in early January. We don't have the full details yet, but I hope you can join.

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2017-December/006199.html
naoliv (2017-12-19 10:28:22+00:00): One more time, you should look for a fix in the app that you are using, instead removing areas that are valid and used by other people.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:46:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:46:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-12-19 05:41:44+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54743741, 54748529.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-12-19 05:42:50+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54743741, 54748529.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-12-19 05:43:36+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54743741, 54748529.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:49:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-12-19 06:05:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54743718, 54748664.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-12-19 06:14:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54665270, 54748664, 54748684.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-12-19 06:49:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 54664956, 54664998, 54665033, 54665069, 54665117, 54665270, 54665341, 54665357, 54665431, 54665527, 54670398, 54741847, 54741929, 54741959, 54742101, 54742142, 54742188, 54743271, 54743367, 54743569, 54743613, 54743718, 54743741, 54743899, 54743987, 54744023, 54744093, 54744287, 54744401, 54744409, 54744419, 54744425, 54744429, 54744476, 54744554, 54748529, 54748544, 54748552, 54748664, 54748684.
viloan (2017-12-19 06:19:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:49:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
Supaplex (2018-01-21 10:03:26+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Josef K (2017-12-20 16:29:23+00:00): Retiraste em vários pontos a tag public_transport=stop_position e substituiste railway=stop->station.
Essas tags são para assinalar o *ponto de paragem na via férrea*, não a estação em si. Essa também já estava assinalada de outra forma, em pontos ou em áreas separados. 
Isto vale pelo menos para as estações em Lisboa, que eu editei, mas provavelmente para as fora de Lisboa também.
Peço que revertes essas alterações.
Josef K (2018-03-22 01:22:22+00:00): Não tendo recebido resposta, reverti as alterações referidas acima.
geozeisig (2018-02-06 17:31:46+00:00): Du hast tower_type=Windmeßmast verwendet. 
1. muss es tower:type heißen. 
2. wurde so ein Wert noch nicht beschrieben und für Werte werden in der Regel auch englische Ausdrücke verwendet. Bitte vorher ins Wiki schauen.
Gruß Dieter
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:45:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-12-20 13:36:25+00:00): Não se cola vias com áreas como fez aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474082906/history já desfiz
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:46:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
pantufla (2024-10-09 22:17:12+00:00): Ojo que sin querer te llevaste una iglesia bien lejos, jeje

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157691507
user_5359 (2017-12-19 11:59:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:46:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
MadelNL (2019-01-20 10:11:23+00:00): Hoi,

Het valt mij op dat je nogal wat brandgangen en olifantenpaadjes in de regio op kaart bent het zetten, terwijl de algemene consensus binnen OSM Nederland is, om dat niet te doen.
Heb je er een reden voor om dat bijvoorbeeld op Heerlerbaan eo wel te doen?
klimpetje (2019-01-20 11:57:07+00:00): Ik je. De uitdrukking olifantenpaadjes niet. Maar ik dacht toch dat osm bedoeld was een weerspiegeling van de realiteit buiten te zijn. Dus als er ergens parkeer inritten en achterommetjes zijn, is dat toch iets waar de mensen gebruik van maken?
MadelNL (2019-01-20 13:21:13+00:00): 




J

Bedankt voor je reactie!
Je hebt ook helemaal gelijk: zoveel mogelijk in kaart brengen wat er op de grond is, maar... Met paadjes achter woningen is er eigenlijk overeenstemming op het forum om die niet in kaart te brengen om twee redenen:
Het leidt tot verwarring bij mensen die onbekend zijn (en dus gewoon op kaart lopen) en het kan tot onwenselijke situaties leiden wanneer een vreemde door een brandgang loopt, in de avond of nacht uren. Omdat het niet allemaal zwart-wit is, is het goed om jezelf de vraag te stellen: hoe zou ik het vinden als ik daar woon en er wordt veelvuldig gebruik gemaakt van dat pad? Natuurlijk is dat ook naar eigen invulling, maar het geeft een beetje aan wat het probleem is.brandgangen ed beter niet mappen, tenzij....
Met olifantenpaden (in Duitsland noemen ze het trampelpfad) is het ook een beetje hetzelfde. Met paden (in de buitengebieden en parken) is eigenlijk een beetje leidend of het pad wel of niet in BGT staat. Ook at is geen harde grens, maar niet officiële paden (die mensen vaak nemen ter afkorting van een bestaande weg ---> olifanten nemen altijd de kortste route, vandaar die naam), worden veelal niet onderhouden door de gemeente of natuurmonumenten (en andere rechthebbenden). Je kunt nu ene pad intekenen dat volgend jaar niet meer zichtbaar is (op en rond de Wilhelminaberg stonden er diverse die al overgroeid waren). Je ziet dat ook wel terug in de Schinveldse Bossen (grotendeel up-to-date gemaakt enkele maanden geleden) en Brunssummerheide (mijn volgend project dat op stapel staat). Als je onbekend bent kun je dus door dit soort paadjes helemaal in het honderd lopen of fietsen.
Heb je er ook al eens over gedacht om over te stappen naar JOSM als editor? Met ID maak je regelmatig onbedoelde fouten en op de schaal waarop jij mapt, is JOSM na een korte periode van gewenning, een verademing!

Ik woon trouwens zelf in Kerkrade en we zijn redelijk actief in hetzelfde gebied, dus vallen mij wel vakker dingen op. Ik had ook al eens ergens op gereageerd of een PM gestuurd, maar daarop kreeg ik geen reactie en toen heb ik bijvoorbeeld het Schutterspark voor een groot deel onder handen genomen.
De paden op Heerlerbaan lat ik overigens wel staan.

Grtz Marco
klimpetje (2019-01-21 09:22:39+00:00): Ik ken JOSM wel. Heeft veel voordelen ja. Ik heb vooral veel relaties onderhouden op JOSM. MTB. En wandelroutes vooral. Nadeel is wel dat je een lokale set objecten moet downloaden. En als ik op het werk snel na een hardloopsessie wat details wil bijwerken, is id handiger. Een paaltje, hekwerk of een achterommetje of doorsteek is zo bijgetekend.
dvdhoven (2019-01-21 15:24:00+00:00): Als je in JOSM de plugin continuous download gebruikt, gaat het net zo snel als bij ID. Ik gebruik die plugin nu al jaren tot grote tevredenheid. Zodra je in JOSM naar een bepaalde plek gaat, download de plugin  alles rondom die plek.
Warm aanbevolen
Groet, Dick van den Hoven
Supaplex (2018-01-21 10:04:17+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mayi007 (2019-03-05 04:10:55+00:00): "Hi adiatmad,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 673294371,way 547842633, way 547842632 classified as 'residential'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'unclassified' as it is leading to residential area.
Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
adiatmad (2019-03-08 04:26:21+00:00): Hi mayi007

You should go and change those way, it could be tertiary road according to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indonesian_Tagging_Guidelines#Roads

Happy mapping on OSM!
Thanks
RicoElectrico (2017-12-19 15:06:20+00:00): Pytanie mam: czy nawet rower i pieszy nie przejdą? Bo podobna droga jest między Gdynia a Dębogórzem, tam tylko samochód nie wjedzie.
Olga | Yanosik (2017-12-19 15:19:12+00:00): Zgłaszający napisał: "Jest na niej znak Znak B- 1 Zakaz ruchu w obu kierunkach. Udostępniona tylko dla pracowników stacji elektroenergetycznej Żarnowiec, służb komunalnych i dojazdu do działek rolnych".
Uważam, że zakaz wjazdu rowerzystów również obowiązuje.
RicoElectrico (2017-12-19 18:36:53+00:00): Wciąż zostają piesi ;)

Spytałbym zgłaszającego.
user_4493657 (2017-12-19 20:14:20+00:00): Mam zastrzeżenia do ograniczenia ruchu na tej ulicy. Na jakiej podstawie koleżanka dodała ograniczenie? Przez ulicę przebiega wiele śladów GPS, inne mapy pokazują że ulica jest normalnie przejezdna bez ządnych ograniczeń. Jakiś dowód w postaci np: zdjęcia jest?
user_4493657 (2017-12-19 20:20:55+00:00): Tutaj jest widoczna jako zwykła droga publiczna http://krokowa.e-mapa.net/
user_4493657 (2017-12-19 20:24:29+00:00): Mapa Here pokazuje że to najlepsza droga przebegająca nad Piasznicą w okolicy!
user_4493657 (2017-12-19 20:32:28+00:00): W uwadze jest info, ze to droga wewnetrzna elektrowni... gdzie jest płot, bramy? Elektrownia jest w innym miejscu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53294547#map=16/54.7219/18.0841 i jest ogrodzona obok drogi jest Stacja elelktroenergetyczna już ograniczona płotem https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86494356.
Ta zmiana wyglada w/g mnie na jakiś żart, chybaże są dowody i to konkretne.
Olga | Yanosik (2017-12-20 07:28:42+00:00): Wysłałam zapytanie do zgłaszającego.
Olga | Yanosik (2017-12-22 22:36:20+00:00): https://i.imgur.com/XitNiOT.jpg
user_4493657 (2017-12-22 23:30:50+00:00): Dzięki.
Tyran (2017-12-30 12:34:49+00:00): Moin!
Dürfte ich bitte erfahren warum der Tag name von Ortsfeuerwehr Lohne auf Feuerwehr Lohne geändert wurde? Die FFw der Stadt Lohne ist laut Satzung in Ortsfeuerwehren gegliedert und somit ist die korrekte Bezeichnung Ortsfeuerwehr Lohne.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:50:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
juhanjuku (2017-12-31 08:41:36+00:00): Please do not use Bing imagery for Estonia. Bing images are not correctly positioned.
Use 'Estonia Ortho (Maaamet)'. Maaamet pictures have much higher resolution too
eggie (2017-12-19 08:51:31+00:00): Als het even kan zou ik de tennisclub op de BAG adresnode taggen en niet op het gebouw. Vlaardingse Lawn Tennis Club is niet de naam van het gebouw maar van de club.
Adres is dan ook gekoppeld aan overige info; website, phone, 
Kerken e.d. hebben meestal wel een naam.
JHvW (2017-12-19 09:00:42+00:00): Volgens mij heb ik een sportterrein ingetekend en dat de naam van de club gegeven, analoog aan de jeu de boules club. Er moeten nog heel veel wijzigingen aangebracht worden omdat dit deel van Vlaardingen vaak veranderd. Ik ben begonnen met de dingen di ik kan afkijken en waarschijnlijk niet op korte termijn zullen veranderen.
eggie (2017-12-19 09:16:41+00:00): Die leisure=sports_center  kan inderdaad de naam krijgen van het terrein. De clubs zelf zou ik op de adresnodes  taggen. Dus die tennisclub naar de node.
Bovendien zie ik die tennisvelden als een gebouw renderen. Daar zit iets (nog) niet goed.
eggie (2017-12-19 09:17:31+00:00): Dat building=yes moet er af.