piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nyampire (2018-06-29 02:32:03+00:00): こんにちは、OSMへようこそ。
編集内容を拝見しましたが、こんなかんじで大丈夫です。
もしできたら、編集を行った後のコメントとして、「1」ではなく、実施した内容のサマリを書いていただけると、編集の意図がわかるのでよりよいです。
例えばこの場合だと、「我孫子町近くの道路を調整」などです。

[OSM wikiの記事](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E5%A4%89%E6%9B%B4%E3%82%BB%E3%83%83%E3%83%88%E3%81%AE%E8%89%AF%E3%81%84%E3%82%B3%E3%83%A1%E3%83%B3%E3%83%88)も参考になります。
それでは、Happy Mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2018-06-30 13:32:09+00:00): Hi Karol Łapajev, welcome to OSM.

Please, don't use the name tag for the description of an. Thanks.
pride_dara (2018-12-20 04:27:57+00:00): Hi Kadaz,
While working on one of Malaysian City,
Came across your edits where road priority is given as highway=road, But these can be marked as residential.
Please suggest if it is otherwise  
node 5725807977
way 603014801
way 602988305
way 602988307
way 602988309
way 602988311
way 603014810
way 603014812
way 602988301
way 603014814
way 603025790
Kadaz (2018-12-21 01:26:25+00:00): Hi pride_dara, I've checked and updated as your suggestion above. Thanks for your reviews.
user_5359 (2018-06-28 15:07:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
4004 (2018-06-28 21:20:25+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты 
тип обьекта как правило в название не входит (ТЦ в данном случае уберу). 
я правильно понимаю, что вы владеете зданием (ТЦ) и держите магазин в нем? 
тогда это два разных обьекта
KVLA-HRO-Mei (2018-06-28 15:04:09+00:00): Dies ist ein privater Anbieter, verwechselst du das evtl. mit der off. Tourismusinformation? AFAIK ist der hier noch? :)
eggie (2018-06-28 14:22:28+00:00): Ja rare fout hier. Ik heb moped=no ook maar weggehaald. 
MVG,
Eggie
ndm (2018-06-28 20:44:37+00:00): Something's broken the rendering -- Wiki says use "With leisure=track when tagging the track"  ?
4004 (2018-06-28 21:13:18+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты
тип обьекта как правило в название не входит (ТЦ в данном случае уберу).
я правильно понимаю, что вы владеете зданием (ТЦ) и держите магазин в нем?
тогда это два разных обьекта
LLlypuk82 (2018-06-28 21:16:37+00:00): нет, это до меня сотрудник Ганны (вероятно) вносил правку
LLlypuk82 (2018-06-28 21:17:21+00:00): а вы как-то валидируете названия объектов?
4004 (2018-06-28 21:20:01+00:00): извините, номер правки не посмотрел, открыл последнюю.
сотрудник поставил review_requested.
я правильно понял, что там тц и магазин, по отдельности?
4004 (2018-06-28 21:20:58+00:00): ТЦ/ГЦ не ставим же в название?
LLlypuk82 (2018-06-29 10:51:18+00:00): там всё-в-одном (основа — продуктовый+«сателлиты»)
ТЦ , как по мне, допустимо
4004 (2018-06-29 22:11:48+00:00): ну, сателлиты содержаться не Ганной, и помещение они всем сдают?
ТЦ допустимо, потому что (на ваш взгляд, я то не посещал) юр название/вывеска с "ТЦ", а на молл не тянет?
LLlypuk82 (2018-06-29 22:18:44+00:00): Да, ресторан там в отдельной пристройке, а остальное внутри основного торгового зала
Так это выглядит: https://yandex.by/maps/154/vitebsk/?ll=30.268505%2C55.172694&z=17&l=stv%2Csta&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=30.263760%2C55.173502&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=168.339253%2C-0.582994&panorama%5Bspan%5D=71.984791%2C29.258784
Исправил на супермаркет
Supaplex (2019-02-07 15:11:11+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
dmlu (2019-05-18 08:13:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Je suis passé dans cette zone mais je n’ai pas trouvé la boulangerie Fischer [1], s’agit-il d’une camionnette qui passe les matins?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5725955341
Spicy_lazy_kat (2019-05-21 21:01:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Je viens de créer le petit batiment qui est en dur sur le parking du Dekra (ancien Goedert)
Ce batiment ressemble a préfabriqué de chantier, il faut rentrer sur le parking pour comprendre que c'est un depôt de pain Ficher
dmlu (2019-05-21 21:07:52+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci pour l’explication! :)
Matthew Darwin (2018-06-30 21:24:39+00:00): Hello,  Thanks for adding new businesses to OSM.

For future reference, please note phone numbers begin with "+1", not "1+". 

as in: +1-403-454-0308

Thanks
Matthew Darwin (2018-06-30 21:28:07+00:00): Also, the address should be split into 2 parts:
addr:housenumber and addr:street
Nakaner (2018-07-01 13:38:58+00:00): Hi Gregory Ilyniak,

I'm sorry but I have deleted almost all additions of this changeset. Similar to you other changesets, you added features hundreds or thousands of kilometers away due to the buggy Wheelmap app. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60278210 for further information.

You received this comment because Wheelmap shares all changes with OpenStreetMap. You can answer this comment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60299641 after logging in with your OSM account (you need one to add new features to Wheelmap).

Best regards

Michael
user_242798 (2018-06-28 18:51:07+00:00): This Changeset was unintendedly merged to previous changeset which was not saved as a independent changeset!
Description correction:
[highway=secondary] "*.boulevard" have all [bicycle=no] set. So all connecting highways should also have [bicycle=no] set.
Create circle on roundabouts.
Delete [oneway=yes] on [junction=roundabout] (needless).
Delete [junction=roundabout] on highway=cycleway (not correct, some have [oneway=no].
Realign some highways to PDOK.
Crossing highways (fix).
bopoh13 (2020-02-18 21:42:53+00:00): Точки дублируют пакет правок osm.org//changeset/57320200
andrewwiseman (2018-06-28 16:27:35+00:00): Thanks for mapping, welcome to OpenStreetMap! When mapping rectangular things like houses don't forget to "square" the corners to make them 90 degrees by hitting 's' on your keyboard after mapping the building. Thanks!
SomeoneElse (2018-12-10 00:28:48+00:00): Was the Bay Horse actually open when you edited this?  It was shut 18 months ago and it's shut now, but it popped back into life in this changeset.
user_5359 (2018-06-28 15:39:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes. 
Please don't mark the whole property as building also. Only mark the building as building. 
I have modified your entry.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:32:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
maraf24 (2018-06-29 20:12:24+00:00): https://openstreetmap.org/node/5726056951
Pierwszy raz widzę taki sygnalizator dla pieszych. 
W takiej sytuacji sygnalizator na przejściu - https://openstreetmap.org/node/75217751 w jakimś routingu dla pieszych uwzględniającym sygnalizację zapewne również zostanie wzięty pod uwagę, a chyba nie o to chodzi?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-07-02 06:01:13+00:00): Ja też - szczerze mówiąc nie jestem pewien jak to powinno być otagowane, wiki podaje kilka propozycji.

Gdyby komuś się chciało to można by przedyskutować która wersja jest lepsza.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:46:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:32:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:41:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
jgon6 (2018-06-28 18:19:53+00:00): Hey Zamanry, I see that you tagged some driveways as highway=residential. That tagging is for residential streets. For a driveway you should tag it with highway=service, service=driveway, and usually access=private
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60252601
Zamanry (2018-06-28 18:25:40+00:00): I wasn’t sure on driveways what to put. Thanks for letting me know! I’ll make driveways that way in the future.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pohl_juergen (2018-06-28 18:11:12+00:00): Warum wird die Haydnstraße bei max Vergrößerung unterbrochen? Dieser Weg ist durchgängig vom Beerberg bis zur Wilhelm-Busch-Straße.
Thomas8122 (2018-06-28 18:57:16+00:00): Alter Stand der Zoomstufe. Das der Weg bis Am Beerberg durchgeht, kann ich beim besten Willen im Luftbild nicht ausmachen
Thomas8122 (2018-06-28 19:01:06+00:00): Das mit dem Durchgehen hab ich missverstanden. Ich dachte nach Süden zu dem Straßenstummel 'Am Beerberg'.
pohl_juergen (2018-06-29 14:09:31+00:00): diese Variant entspricht den tatsächlichen Verhältnissen vor Ort am besten. Die Straßenführung mit Luftbildaufnahmen zu vergleichen geht in diesem Fall schief da die Wege teilweise mit großen Bäumen abgedeckt sind.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Leo Slager (2018-06-28 23:06:12+00:00): Door het verwijderen van de wegen is de route van bus 55 ernstig beschadigd. De editor iD is niet zo geschikt om met routerelaties om te gaan. Over gaan tot het gebruik van JOSM is aan te raden.
Leo Slager (2018-06-28 23:11:18+00:00): De route is weer gerepareerd.
Als je een trafficlight wilt verwijderen hoef je niet alle wegen van de kaart te verwijderen !  De node aanklikken en de tag verwijderen volstaat.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:42:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:22:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pitscheplatsch (2020-02-16 09:42:53+00:00): Hallo,
welche Bedeutung haben die eingetragen BuildingIds? Kann irgendwo etwas darüber nachgelesen werden? Danke.
Linus Wolf (2020-02-17 20:44:23+00:00): Die sind aus dem Liegenschaftsverzeichnis der Abteilung Immobilien der Uni Mainz: https://www.verwaltung.immobilien.uni-mainz.de/liegenschaftsverzeichnis/

Das Tag war schon vorher in Verwendung – es sah für mich so aus, als sei der Großteil der Nummern schon eingetragen gewesen. Ich habe sie deswegen damals aktualisiert und vervollständigt.
luiswoo (2018-06-28 17:28:36+00:00): что это за пиздец — район выезда из желейной дороги, да и ещё с кодом краснодарского края?
user_5359 (2018-06-28 17:16:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Please search for the key shop.
Magick93 (2018-06-29 08:49:56+00:00): Hi magnus86! In this changeset I found a point in South 8th Street which is tagged as Church of Christ, this is a mistake please you have to apply all the tags back to the church, I mean all the gnis and ele tags. Cheers!
Magick93 (2018-06-29 08:43:03+00:00): Hi magnus86 I reviewed your changeset and found a node that was moved from the Church of the Nazarene to new alley line to the north east located beetween Broadway St
Myazyk (2018-08-11 16:47:19+00:00): Нащо ти наносиш на карту об'єкти, які вже є нанесені? Для чого дублювати?
Myazyk (2018-08-11 16:48:09+00:00): На вул. Чорновола 24 ніякого готелю не існує
user_5359 (2018-06-28 17:12:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the values for the both keys, please?
jptolosa (2018-07-01 05:22:37+00:00): Por qué eliminaste la ciudad de Iquique?
maraf24 (2018-06-28 21:25:50+00:00): Jest taki tag, traffic_calming=island, właśnie na takie przypadki.
chachafish (2018-10-09 13:34:52+00:00): Howdy. Thanks for your additions to the map :) I'm following up on some OSM Inspector-tagged errors. It seems you created a long untagged line surrounding the Uncompahgre River. Was this meant to represent something? Thanks :)
bob82many (2018-10-09 14:47:32+00:00): Hi,

The edits I made to the Uncompahgre River corrected its position using the aerial from the Gunnison River south to Ash Mesa Rd.  South of Ash Mesa Rd is out of my jurisdiction and the linework that exist south/east of that point is from the out-dated USGS NHD data.  Depending on the OSM location the river is incorrect and there are several streams/creeks/off-shoots in a similar situation and/or do not exist anymore.  For Dry Creek I only edited south to D25 Rd.  Can only hope someone else is willing to edit the Uncompahgre River south of Ash Mesa toward Montrose using the imagery. 

The web version does illustrate numerous disconnected streams, while the edit version shows them connected.  This is original NHD data, untouched by me and evident as you move south toward Montrose.  If you look in the lower right hand corner you can see who is responsible for river polygon lines (flood way or river boundary).  For my edits, I deleted those polygonal lines because they were 1.  positionally inaccurate and 2. such a polygon can not be verified.

Thanks and have a good week.

Regards, Bob
chachafish (2018-10-09 16:43:32+00:00): Okay, thanks :)
mueschel (2018-07-03 10:57:34+00:00): Hi,
please have a look to the Wiki to learn about common tags  - only those described in the Wiki can be understood by other users and software. E.g. "currency:Bitcoin" is not defined and should be currency:XBT.
See  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:currency
eggie (2018-06-28 18:05:09+00:00): curt 1us.. probeer echt plakken van wegen aan landuse te voorkomen.
Op het moment dat iemand gaat schuiven krijg je ellende, want alles komt mee. 
Ik zal de residential van Elsloo losmaken. 
Overweeg om over te schakelen naar een "volwassen" editor.
iD is een kleine ramp. 


editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2018-06-28 18:10:07+00:00): los!
curt1us (2018-06-28 18:21:12+00:00): Eggie - ik zie nu je punt, ik heb deze keer uiteraard niet bewust “geplakt” dus het zal vanwege iD in de achtergrond gebeurd zijn. Ik ga die andere editors eens bekijken. Ik ga morgen je andere suggesties implementeren.
eggie (2018-06-28 18:48:33+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor je reactie.
JOSM plakt ook, maar m'n favoriete toets is G en de boel is weer los.
Ook heeft JOSM een validator die je waarschuwt bij verkeerde uploads. De validator kun je ook los draaien.
Succes..
eggie (2018-06-28 17:45:48+00:00): Dag Curt... probeer een huisarts svp op de adresnode bij te taggen en niet op het gebouw zelf. Winkels, bedrijven e.d. altijd op de adresnode. 
Kerken en scholen zijn dan soms weer anders. 
Dit was je edit. .. en svp niet schuiven met de kaart met editor iD. Je verplaatst zaken voor dat je het weet.
Kijk je nog naar "je" huisarts.
Wellicht heeft-ie ook een naam. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-06-28 17:49:00+00:00): Het adresnummer 82 komt hier 2x voor. De BAG adresnode is leidend. Wellicht het adres van de ATM afhalen?
Want nr 82 zal de voormalige bank zijn. Kijk je hier nog even naar?
prmtl (2018-06-28 20:59:27+00:00): Hi! Are you sure this is correct place? It is in on the ground not in some building.
atcomapper (2018-06-29 06:30:33+00:00): Kunne du ikke overveje at bruge source:maxspeed i stedet for maxspeed:type, sådan som vi stort set bruger i resten af Danmark?
atcomapper (2018-06-29 06:32:11+00:00): I øvrigt er den korrekte værdi sandsynligvis "DK:urban", ikke "sign". "DK:urban" bruges hvis hastighedsgrænsen af fastsat ved at vejen ligger indenfor bymæssig bebyggelse (altså sådan en tavle her: https://files.engrospriser.dk/media/com_redshopb/images/originals/pim/import/Images/6-E55-2040-100.jpg )
Hjart (2018-06-29 06:47:57+00:00): Leif forsøger sig her med appen StreetComplete (som det ses af created:by tagget) og har dermed ikke direkte kontrol over hvilke tags der bliver brugt.
Leif Lodahl (2018-07-01 17:56:01+00:00): Hej JKHougaard,
Tak for din kommentar. 
Som Michael rigtig nok skriver har jeg forsøgt mig med app'en Street Complete. Jeg stopper med det nu på baggrund af din kommentar.
Men det åbner for en diskussion generelt om de aftaler vi har om konsistent kortlægning, for jeg tror ikke det er sidste gang vi ser denne eller andre apps. 
Jeg kan i øvrigt godt lide ideen om at man som almindelig borger kan anvende simple apps til at bidrage med. Det gør det lettere at komme i gang uden at man skal sætte  sig ind i alle mulige tekniske detaljer om hvordan ting tagges. I app'en bliver man stillet et simpelt spørgsmål, som man svarer på hvis man kan. Nemmere kan det ikke blive.
Men...
Hvis opmærkningen er forkert har vi et problem, og vi har også set at en navigations app lagde helt åndsvage kommentarer ind.

Mvh.
Leif
Parzelle13 (2018-06-28 22:02:41+00:00): Sinnvolle Änderung, was soll diese bewirken?
Sollte es sich hier um ein Geschäft/Unternehmen/ Handwerker/Restaurant o.ä. handeln, so wäre es sinnvoll im Wiki nachzulesen, wie man so etwas richtig einträgt,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

oder im Forum nach zu fragen.

Gruß
NKA (2018-06-30 19:54:46+00:00): You deleted several islands. I have reverted.
Vitru (2018-10-04 13:11:29+00:00): Please tell me the changeset number.
5m4u9 (2018-06-29 21:03:20+00:00): hi, info (from government) of RVF in cities with large populations is wrong. In the case of Cochabamba, petrolera avenue, heroinas avenue, ruben dario avenue are not truck roads, they are just important or secondary streets.... we just got the route that trucks do that allows townhall.
//
same case of santa cruz de la sierra, oruro, lapaz, potosi, tarija, trinidad, cobija. the official information of the state is wrong. the municipalities of these cities have other routes for the circulation of trucks.
5m4u9 (2018-06-29 21:10:01+00:00): current route for F4 road in cochabamba, from west to east and vice versa: blanco galindo -> melchor perez de olguin -> circunvalacion beijing -> 6 de junio to villazon avenue
5m4u9 (2018-06-29 21:15:26+00:00): F7 to F4: petrolera -> santa barbara -> fuerza aerea, guillermo killman -> ingavi -> cañada cochabamba -> beijing -> blanco galindo
5m4u9 (2018-06-29 21:17:16+00:00): F7 to F4 (east): petrolera -> siglo xx -> circuito bolivia -> ruben dario -> general galindo -> villazon avenue
Evandering (2018-06-29 21:54:46+00:00): Thanks for the info! I'll make adjustments very soon.
maraf24 (2018-06-28 22:28:59+00:00): Trzeba ją jeszcze, tj. budynek, przypisać do kategorii toalety publicznej oraz ustawić atrybut płatności.
A samo "WC Toaleta - płatna" nazwą toalety nie jest. Zapewne nie ma ona nazwy.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-29 18:18:16+00:00): Innymi słowy: teraz jest to jest budynek z nazwą. Chcemy raczej by było to oznaczone jako budynek będący toaletą.

jeśli edytujemy w iD (a z tego edytora korzystasz) to można kliknąć w "Budynek" w lewym górnym rogu, znaleźć toalety (wpisanie powinno wystarczyć).

Można też w menu po lewej zjechać na doł do pełnej listy tagów (być może kliknąć na nagłówek by ją rozwinąć) i dodać "amenity" z wartością "toilets". W ten sposób dodałem "fee" z wartością "yes" by oznaczyć toaletę jako płatną.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-06-29 18:19:42+00:00): Teraz toaleta powinna być rozpoznana jako toaleta w domyślnym stylu mapy, w aplikacji MAPS.ME, w aplikacji OSMand i innych konsumentach danych którzy pokazują toalety.
literan (2018-07-01 11:56:22+00:00): Добрый день. А разве Московская экономическая школа - это обычная школа для детей (amenity=school)?  И еще, вы тег amenity=school задублировали и на территории, и на здании, так быть не должно (один объект на местности - один на карте). Это исправлю
Pasha Rockof (2018-07-02 11:06:42+00:00): Хорошо.
gormo (2018-06-29 09:23:59+00:00): Danke für deine Korrekturen! :-) und bleib weiter dabei, die halbe Stadt hast du ja schon! :-)
DevioThules (2018-06-29 12:42:53+00:00): Ich werde versuchen grob den Landkreis hinzubekommen, da ich ja an einer Quelle sitze ^^ 
Auch weitere Korrekturen werde ich noch von meinen vorherigen Fehlern vornehmen, keine Sorge!
JochenOSM (2018-06-29 13:09:33+00:00): Sieht doch schon gleich viel besser aus. Du nimmst dir gleich den ganzen Landkreis vor? Respekt, ich glaube eine Stadt alleine ist schon sehr viel Arbeit, bis da alle Hausnummern, Geschäfte, Öffnungszeiten usw. hinterlegt sind
GinaroZ (2018-07-02 00:49:46+00:00): Hi, just wondering if you meant to remove the railway=station tag from here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/123360628/history ?