piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skyper (2022-03-17 14:31:18+00:00): Hello CreCrePL
What did you try to express with `agricultural=yes` plus `maxweight=7.5` (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440238356)?
Did you mean `maxweight=7.5` plus `maxweight:conditional=no @ agricultural`?
Regards skyper
CreCrePL (2022-05-17 08:37:53+00:00): I suspect it was a case of 2 signs on one post: Max Weight 7.5T and No motor vehicles except agricultural
Noen (2021-05-16 23:37:21+00:00): Hei! Dette er ikke riktig måte å legge til en merket rute. Jeg tilbakestiller denne og de to andre endringene dine.
IlBano (2021-05-29 16:54:11+00:00): Ciao.
In questo changeset hai inserito questa restrizione https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12719983#map=17/45.65136/13.79131
 che non consente di proseguire su Via della Ginnastica/Via del Farneto arrivando da Via Carlo De Marchesetti, ma obbliga a svoltare a sinistra.
Immagino sia un errore.

Ciao
alessandrocarmeli (2021-05-30 11:02:43+00:00): hai perfettamente ragione! ho corretto, chiedo scusa
NorthCrab (2023-05-20 12:12:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/595646878

Tutaj nigdy nie było paving_stones :/
bxl-forever (2021-05-17 16:16:34+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for editing the map and welcome to OSM.
We might have a bit of an issue with some of your cycle lanes edits.
Example here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7252487
cycleway:lane=advisory looks incorrect.
AFAIK, last year they painted a new lane for cyclists using the street against traffic.  Unlike UK law, cycle lanes in Belgium (those with = = =) are mandatory and exclusive of other vehicles.  cycleway:*:lane=advisory is incorrect.
StreetComplete is a very nice app but maybe it would be wiser to turn off some of the quests in the app settings, because it writes incorrect values and forces us to delete and re-survey everything after you.
Thanks.
bxl-forever (2021-05-17 16:17:12+00:00): Wrong link, sorry.  This is the street I am talking about.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72524871
bendjx (2021-05-17 17:05:35+00:00): Hello, I am new to OSM editing and have started editing the map with MapQuest.
I logged in mapquest what I saw on the street last night, painted bikes and chevrons on both sides. That translated to the "advisory" keyword, which corresponds to belgian law afaik.
I just went to see in mapilliary and indeed some images from 2020 show chevrons on one side and = = = on the other. I will go again to verify tonight and correct my edit if needed.
bxl-forever (2021-05-17 17:27:52+00:00): Ok, thanks.
EneaSuper (2021-05-17 10:23:36+00:00): Ciao, temo che questo lavoro non sia riuscito bene 😅
Davidezd (2021-05-17 11:45:23+00:00): Perché scusa,secondo te il sentiero è fattibile?No difatti ho cancellato la tracciatura.
EneaSuper (2021-05-17 15:34:42+00:00): No no, intendevo dire che hai disegnato un'area dalla forma troppo strana per essere corretta.
Glassman (2021-05-16 23:16:18+00:00): Marc - looking over your edits I see you removed a number of tracks, I assume because they are on private property. We still map objects on private property all the time. If it exists then it can be mapped. If there are no trespassing signs or gates limiting access then it's appropriate to add access=private.

Also - we don't use descriptive names, like name=Driveway. The tag service=driveway does the same thing. 

Can I get you to relook at your edits to see if the tracks should be added back as well as remove the descriptive name? 

Let me know if you need help or more information.

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104782265
Tilia_J (2021-05-16 20:22:34+00:00): Goedenavond,

Ik heb van je edit weer een track verwijderd:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104784142

Deze was namelijk een maand geleden ook al eens weggehaald. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103396088

Betreffend pad is ongeveer een jaar geleden omgeploegd.

Besef goed dat Strava tot twee jaar terug in de tijd gaat.

Prettige avond en map ze!
jordan_osm (2021-05-17 07:20:37+00:00): Mijn excuses. Bedankt voor de correctie. Gisteren in het Kroondomein gefietst en daarna iets te enthousiast ontbrekende paadjes toegevoegd.
multimodaal (2021-09-15 08:28:43+00:00): Hoi, ik heb ook nog een pad op abandoned:highway gezet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943613749/history

Ik kon hier gister niet in met de fiets omdat het omgeploegd / deels begroeid is. Je kan nog wel zien dat het een pad is geweest. Er zijn al best wat paden opgeheven in de Kroondomeinen onlangs. 
Voordeel van abandoned:highway boven verwijderen is dat het (a) recht doet aan de situatie dat sommige mensen ter plekke een (voormalig) pad herkennen en (b) het helpt voorkomen dat het pad opnieuw wordt ingetekend adhv bronnen zoals Strava, AHN, BRT, BGT. Groet!
jordan_osm (2021-09-15 11:36:53+00:00): Prima correctie. Thanks.
DanGlover (2021-05-21 12:45:47+00:00): Hi Peter - RM show this as 19:00/13:15 but you've entered 09:00/13:15 which is an unlikely combination. Not sure whether StreetComplete allows you to update though?

Dan
Peter Newman (2021-05-21 14:02:08+00:00): Hi Dan,

Well spotted. Although I think you mean I've actually entered 07:00/13:15 i.e. 12 hours out on the weekday side.

There's a tiny chance there is a bug in StreetComplete 32.0-alpha2, but only in the resurvey part, as I've successfully entered 24 hour times for a new postbox with that version.

Realistically it's more likely given the very wet conditions when I surveyed it, either my finger slipped or the phone misregistered it.

Feel free to revert the changeset, or I'll try and get back that way fairly soon to resurvey it more carefully, but I imagine it's my error looking at the history.

SC asks you to enter it in full during the resurvey, hence the potential introduction of errors.
DanGlover (2021-05-21 14:14:56+00:00): Peter - I'll let you sort it out as and when. While there, would you be able to check the references, please? At the moment it's HA1 1001 on both sides but RM data suggests one should be HA1 100.

Dan
Peter Newman (2021-07-28 13:33:22+00:00): Hi Dan,

I went and confirmed collection times and took a picture (which will be there until the note is closed):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2753753

Fixed in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108761831

I assume you mean both apertures?  Unfortunately as we didn't have a note I forgot to check that, but looking at the photo, the left one is clearly 1001 which would normally be the lower number I think.
hauke-stieler (2021-05-16 20:00:46+00:00): Hi,

die Geschwindigkeitsbeschränkungen, die du hier eingetragen hast, sind leider falsch. Es gibt hier zumindest Streckenweise eine zeitliche Einschränkung, dass von 6-22 Uhr 30 gilt, ansonsten 50. In OSM wird das mit "maxspeed:conditional=30 @ (Mo-Sa 06:00-22:00)" getaggt. Am Anfang und Ende der Semperstraße gilt dagegen permanent 50.

Habs das mal korrigiert.

Grüße
Hauke
Martin Zeiger (2021-05-17 04:17:29+00:00): Moin Hauke, 

danke für deinen Hinweis. 

Die Semperstrasse ist jedoch vor einigen Wochen im geänderten Bereich komplett als Tempo 30 Zone eingerichtet worden. Die zeitliche Beschränkung für die Schule ist daher entfallen. 

Schau mal hier: https://www.mopo.de/hamburg/gruene-im-glueck-in-dieser-hamburger-strasse-gilt-bald-tempo-30-37934770

Gruß, Jan-Niclas
hauke-stieler (2021-05-17 12:20:28+00:00): Hi,

danke für die Richtigstellung. Bitte immer einen Changeset-Kommentar und die Quellen angeben, damit man weiß woher Änderungen kommen und wie plausibel sie sind.

Habe jetzt auch den Hinweis 2546501 gesehen, der das Tempolimit beschreibt und die dazugehörige Drucksache referenziert.

Hab das Tagging entsprechend angepasst.

Grüße
Hauke
mueschel (2021-05-17 18:44:23+00:00): Hi,
could you check the order of parts of your destination keys? The common order is:

destination
[:subkey]
[:to]
[:lanes][:forward|:backward|:both_ways]

e.g. not destination:lanes:ref, but destination:ref:lanes.

Thanks!
Herrieman (2021-05-17 20:57:13+00:00): Hi, thanks for pointing it out! Don't know why I messed this up, but fixed it now.
Herrieman (2021-05-17 21:00:20+00:00): I also made this mistake in some other changesets, fixed those to. Thanks again for spotting it!
BCNorwich (2021-05-19 07:31:33+00:00): Hi I've changed some name tags to description tags as they are descriptions not formal names.

Regards Bernard.
itineris (2025-01-20 10:02:39+00:00): Szia!

A Petőfi Sándor utcát mi alapján minősítetted át lakó-pihenő övezetté, 20-as korlátozással? Tavaly ősszel már/még nem volt az. A Móricz Zsigmond út felőli részén semmilyen korlátozás nincsen, a sétány is csak behajtani tilos, kivéve célforgalom.

Üdv:
Ákos
Bálint (2025-01-20 11:00:08+00:00): Szia! Így három év távlatából már nem emlékszem tisztán, de jó eséllyel abból indultam ki, hogy az Erkel Ferenc utca bejáratánál kint van a lakó-pihenőövezet tábla, aminek nem láttam a feloldását.
itineris (2025-01-20 11:39:31+00:00): Az lehet, mert a Petőfi felől menve sehol sincs eleje/vége.
Глеб (2021-05-20 14:26:54+00:00): хорошая правка
Enock4seth (2021-05-16 21:41:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM, this should help you with tracing rectangular building appropriately https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/
Enock4seth (2021-05-16 21:42:21+00:00): Also a good changeset comment describes briefly what you mapped, see examples https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Examples
Mordechai23 (2022-02-07 17:37:49+00:00): grade1 i surface=ground się wyklucza
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-09 09:04:08+00:00): Chodzi np o https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942376929
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-21 18:23:45+00:00): Co chciałeś w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/942376929 zaznaczyć? Jaką nawierzchnię tak naprawdę tam podac chciałeś?
rskedgell (2021-06-15 20:19:55+00:00): The railway tracks between Bow East and the canal appear to be in use again - there was a freight train there when I cycled along the Greenway this afternoon. Are there any reasons I shouldn't reverse the disused status?
Mauls (2021-06-16 08:27:09+00:00): None at all if they're in use!
rskedgell (2021-06-16 08:50:28+00:00): Thanks. I expect they'll remain in use if the Bow East concrete plant plans go ahead.
Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106451570
bxl-forever (2021-06-20 10:28:21+00:00): Hello,
I heard there were plans to remove the exception in that area and remove all the 50-kph signs that had been installed over the New Year.
If that’s the case I will update the source:maxspeed tags accordingly because simply changing the maxspeed tag is incorrect.
Are the 50-kph signs all gone?
ovruni (2021-05-16 22:44:24+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambio se agregaron etiquetas con clave barrier en varios vías, las cuales no parecen verificarse desde las imágenes aéreas (solamente en Puertas del Sol y el Urbanización Ingeniero 2 parecen haber barreras en todo el contorno) y además generaban cruces con calles, por ese motivo he retirado las etiquetas en las otras vías.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
ivanbranco (2021-05-21 18:41:39+00:00): Ciao Ysogo, ti scrivo solo per ricordarti che "Via" va scritto sempre in maiuscolo, dovrei aver sistemato io :)
eggie (2021-05-17 05:31:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-17 05:33:25+00:00): Je hebt addr:city	Meliskerke	
addr:housenumber	1	
addr:postcode	4365AG	
addr:street	Burgemeester Adelaarstraat
verwijderd.  Bestraat dat adres niet meer?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-05-17 05:46:13+00:00): Ahh.. gesloopt zie ik al.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-05-17 08:34:16+00:00): Feedback..  Er loopt nog steeds een afrastering over die parkeerplaats. Is dat wel de bedoeling?

MVG
eggie
kapazao (2021-05-17 10:53:11+00:00): Hola, parece que has unido tuberías subterráneas con algún camino y no deberían tener relación. Tenlo en cuenta para otra vez y si es posible corrígelo.
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104786212
lololailo (2021-05-17 11:36:06+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu comentario. Creo que lo corregí esta mañana, lo hice sin darme cuenta. 
Hace unos dias escribí en la lista de correo para ver si alguien podia revisar mis ediciones ya que soy nuevo y no se si lo estoy haciendo bien. ¿Te importaria echarle un vistazo? Además me cuesta entender el funcionamiento de osmcha. Estoy usando geofabrik para ver mis errores pero algunos no los entiendo bien. 
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104786212
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-05-17 03:50:36+00:00): Daniel, porque removeu este trecho de rua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943702191 ?
Daniel Bolgheroni (2021-05-17 14:52:01+00:00): Removi uma residential road que não existe nessa mesma área (chequei presencialmente), e a primeira impressão é que esse trecho não existe também.

Acho que inicialmente o mapeador se baseou no Google Maps (que coloca esse trecho), mas precisaria checar in loco.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-05-17 15:47:58+00:00): Então, eu conferi e existem traços GPS que indicam a movimentação de pessoas no trecho que redesenhei, talvez não seja residencial. Aí a solução é trocar o tipo, mas não excluir.
G_P_J (2021-05-17 07:56:26+00:00): Ogromna prośba - jeśli dodajesz numer budynku, dodaj też miejscowość (ze znacznikiem addr:place dla miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic). Budynek do poprawy: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/943649969
km2bp (2021-05-17 08:26:35+00:00): Będę miał to na uwadze. Użyłem nakładki na edytor Id "
Geoportal 2: Punkty adresowe" trochę wkurzyło mnie że automatycznie nie sugeruje po kliknięciu na puste pola  kodu pocztowego ulicy i miejscowości dlatego wpisałem tylko sam numer budynku bo przeważnie i tak się tym nigdy nie zajmowałem a jedynie dodawałem obrysy.
G_P_J (2021-05-17 08:39:10+00:00): Takie dane najczęściej są na punktach adresowych/budynkach obok. Można skopiować.
km2bp (2021-05-17 08:44:11+00:00): Zauważ że już to zrobiłem ale tylko nazwa miejscowości była na budynku obok bez kodu pocztowego
CloCkWeRX (2021-05-17 01:11:41+00:00): You need to stop removing this trail.

It does exist, you can see multiple people have ridden it via the presence of strava GPS traces:
https://www.trailforks.com/trails/byrning-man/

If forestry SA have explicitly closed it or removed access; there are better ways to model that. However, since they created the trail on trailforks and are actively engaged with local mountain biking clubs; that seems fairly unlikely they would close it off but also not update any other sources.
marczoutendijk (2021-05-19 09:05:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5042
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Glassman (2021-05-17 00:09:05+00:00): Thanks for adding Silver Lake Park!
yasobara (2021-05-17 00:15:46+00:00): You are welcome. I am going to visit the park next week and I wanted to make sure the information is up to date.
iandees (2021-05-17 11:12:43+00:00): Please be careful that you use an appropriate changeset description. It looks like you're continuing to reclassify roads here, not working on Centennial Lakes.

What factors are you using as a basis for these road reclassifications?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104787432
TheRoadDudeMN (2021-05-17 17:19:07+00:00): Yes. This is indeed part of Road Redesignation. Just finishing a previous set of changesets for Centennial Lakes, I mistakenly forgot to change the description for the changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104787432
TheRoadDudeMN (2021-05-17 17:23:11+00:00): As for factors, I considered overall connectivity and similarities between other roads. For example, I changed Chicago to tertiary because it was arguably more similar to Portland than it is to 4th. Cedar Avenue was changed to primary on the basis that it connects MN 77 to downtown, and carries quite a few lanes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104787432
eggie (2021-05-17 05:37:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM..
Please don't shift the map in editmodus.
This may harm the map.
It's better to do seperate uploads.
Greetz,
eggie
A67-A67 (2021-05-17 12:13:53+00:00): You've added the name of the model to the name-tag of these wind turbines. The correct tag is manufacturer:type, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:manufacturer:type

The name tag should contain the name of the individual wind turbine itself, if it exists.
user_5359 (2021-05-17 02:20:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. 
Please check also the housenumber of https://www.osm.org/way/943659321! I assume it should be 7214...
felipeeugenio (2021-05-17 00:18:04+00:00): Xabier
Esa calle es totalmente una calle de Servicio (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified)

útil sería que indicaras por donde entra el camino del poniente, que los árboles impiden ver por donde entra.
saludos
ika-chan! (2021-05-18 02:57:10+00:00): What's the source for all those "cities"? As far as I can remember, the whole place is mainly desert with only a few quarry-related settlements according to satellite imagery.
neo-plan (2021-05-18 19:54:38+00:00): Можно ссылку на какое-нибудь постановление или документ о переименовании безымянной дороги?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-17 13:18:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104824142 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some more vandalism in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5035 .
ovruni (2021-05-17 01:39:38+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. En el texto de conjunto de cambios ha ingresado " tema academico", el cual no explica los cambios realizados, por favor revise la sección sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
ovruni (2021-05-17 01:40:35+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. En el texto de conjunto de cambios ha ingresado " tema academico", el cual no explica los cambios realizados, por favor revise la sección sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0] Por otra partes, los nombres no son para descripciones. [1]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-17 13:18:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104824142 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some more vandalism in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5035 .
aixbrick (2021-05-17 16:01:44+00:00): Hallo,
die "description" ändert nichts daran, dass es weiterhin ein Windrad ist. Das ist ein Fall für einen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix. 
Gruß
aixbrick (2021-05-30 13:05:39+00:00): Keine Reaktion, "disused" gesetzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105567298.
ElliottPlack (2021-05-17 12:42:04+00:00): Boop, please write more about why you're removing items when doing so. Your not writing good comments despite calls from the community to do so has caused you to be blocked, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5034 which is unfortunate. You seem to care about the OSM project, so please type out a sentence or two about your changes. I always try to answer What, Why, and How in mine, feel free to look at my edits as an example.

In these edits, you deleted a bunch of buildings but didn't add any back. Are they under construction? if so, you should add a construction area to notify other mappers of the reason for the deletions. Then write a comment saying there is construction there. I would always try to trace the new building under construction and add the appropriate tags if you can.
ElliottPlack (2021-05-17 12:43:55+00:00): Additionally, it looks like the Harford Heights isn't totally removed but you've deleted the full thing. Part of this building contains address data. The address should be preserved when removing the building (but I wouldn't have removed the building here.)
boopington (2021-05-17 21:46:16+00:00): I did not delete the whole building I only deleted the satellite buildings that have been demolished.
boopington (2021-05-17 21:47:51+00:00): the only ones I deleted were school buildings the are being replaced.
ElliottPlack (2021-05-18 02:52:20+00:00): Perhaps you only meant to delete some buildings but it is clear in the dataset that the DWG posted in your block that the entire site was removed. Did you see that link?
boopington (2021-05-18 18:02:32+00:00): yes I did, thats weird because I clearly remember only removing two buildings.
jamillikesapplejuice (2021-05-18 04:24:12+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=trunk

Typically, trunk in the US has been meant an expressway, ie, basically a freeway, but it might have intersections. Or it might be fully controlled, but only a single carriageway. Or it's dual carriageway, but only one lane on a carriageway.
ZeLonewolf (2021-05-18 04:35:37+00:00): Hi,
This interpretation is inconsistent with how highway classifications are used in the rest of the world.  There is an emerging consensus, at least in New England, to properly apply functional highway classifications so they can be used as intended.  This is one such application.  The physical highway classification you described is the reason that, for example, the map is broken at zoom 7 in the TX/OK/KS area.  I invite you to join the discussions happening in #local-us-northeast on the OSM US Slack as well as recent threads on the talk-us mailing list discussing highway classifications.
DressyPear4 (2021-05-17 09:48:09+00:00): Não adicione tags desnecessárias, pode perguntar se tiver dúvidas em editar o mapa
ovruni (2021-05-17 03:17:09+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se esta siguiendo un patro con otras cuentas que han aparecido, que han estado eliminando objetos multiples objetos existentes con el objetivo de redibujar las cosas, lo cual no mantiene el historial. Por este motivo procedo a revertir este conjunto de cambios. Por otra parte, el uso del texto "s" no explica en que han consistito sus cambios, por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [1]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
ovruni (2021-05-17 03:21:48+00:00): Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
ovruni (2021-05-17 03:18:47+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se esta siguiendo un patron con otras cuentas que han aparecido, que han estado eliminando múltiples objetos existentes con el objetivo de redibujar las cosas, lo cual no mantiene el historial. [0] Por este motivo procedo a revertir este conjunto de cambios. Por otra parte, el uso del texto " TEMA ACADÉMICO" sigue sin explicar en que han consistito sus cambios, por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [1]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios