piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rik_ (2021-06-26 11:11:59+00:00): Hallo Kev153,

das Thema hatten wir doch schonmal - diese Straße ist nach den hier in Deutschland üblichen Regeln kein `trunk`. Es ist erstmal unerheblich, wie das in Skandinavien gehandhabt wird.

Dass es je nach Land durchaus Unterschiede gibt, wie Straßen gemappt werden, kannst du hier [1] leicht sehen.

Ich möchte dich bitten, dich an das deutsche OSM-Wiki zu halten und die Änderung wieder rückgängig zu machen. Die Straße ist weiterhin nicht kreuzungsfrei, kann also kein `trunk` sein. Bitte schau dir auch die Seite zum Thema `trunk` im Wiki [2] an. Und schau bitte auch gleich nochmal beim Tag `motorroad` [3] vorbei, ich glaube das ist die Verwechslung die dir hier passiert.

Danke und viele Grüße

rik

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway:International_equivalence

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk#.C3.9Cbersicht

[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:motorroad
rik_ (2021-06-29 06:02:00+00:00): Hallo Kev153,

da du nicht antwortest werde ich die Änderung rückgängig machen.

Ich möchte dich bitten, in Zukunft von Änderungen abzusehen, welche mit über viele Jahre etablierte Regeln  nicht in Einklang zu bringen sind.

Bitte bedenke in Zukunft, dass die Konsequenzen von Änderungen üblicherweise deutlich weiter gehen als „so sieht es auf der Karte schöner aus“. Vergleiche dazu auch folgenden Wiki-Artikel: [1]

Danke für dein Verständnis und viele Grüße

rik


[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
woodpeck (2021-06-25 20:09:36+00:00): Dear TLCastle, thank you for your recent efforts to repair some of the damage you have done to OSM. Sadly, there's much more work to do; OSM is still full of your "jokes" and personal attacks against other people like "LGBTQ Supporter Nate King Avenue", "Samantha's WAP", "Big Jim's", "Big Mouth Sam Road", "Richard Clendenin Drive", "Beth Smells Like Pickles Drive" and of course various incarnations of your very own "Travis L. Castle Drive". Please go through all your edits and repair these problems. I am afraid I am not able to research each individual piece of information that you have put in; if you cannot find the time to do the necessary repairs in the next 2 weeks, I will have to remove any and all your contributions from OSM.

Thank you 
Frederik Ramm
OSMF Data Working Group, Ticket#2021050210000027
dgitto (2021-06-28 07:04:14+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2021-06-28 07:08:21+00:00): Il Multisala Iris era già mappato. Area Iris cosa è? un'area all'aperto?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-16 22:24:46+00:00): caminho de casa? este nome é oficial? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923745182
eggie (2021-06-25 17:08:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
CjMalone (2021-06-29 15:05:18+00:00): You deleted address data in this, please revert.
trigpoint (2021-06-29 17:30:29+00:00): Reverted as requested.

Sorry didn't see the later versions only the spam and verbal diarrhea.
CjMalone (2021-06-29 21:18:46+00:00): Thanks, postcodes are a bit of a target for me at the moment, I'll take any source I can.
ElliottPlack (2022-09-22 15:49:35+00:00): Hi there, I see you changed the access tag of your own trail here from bicycle=yes to bicycle=mtb. The MTB tag is not documented (that I can find) and so I am not entirely sure what it means. Can you tell me, did you read somewhere that you should enter mtb trails this way? Thanks!

Elliott Plack  
OSMF Data Working Group
sdreilinger (2022-09-22 17:11:43+00:00): Hi Elliott: Regarding the bicycle=mtb tag, I may have been looking at this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q153 and mis-used it. If there is a best-practice for labeling trails for mountain-bike use, please let me know. This particular trail segment was wiped out by a storm in Feb 2021; I'm going to delete it from OSM.
ElliottPlack (2022-09-22 23:15:36+00:00): No problem, I am just doing a little investigating here to see if I can trace it back to a source, then we can update that. In the meantime, yes there are a few great MTB resources on OSM's wiki. In short, mtb=yes is used on paths that are MTB suitable...

 - - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking#How_to_tag_ways_appropriate_for_mtbiking  
 - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb

Cheers,
Elliott
Tomas Straupis (2021-06-26 07:18:05+00:00): Labas. O kas atsitiko su viešbučiu Linėja? Nes jis panaikintas, vietoj jo sukurtas naujas viešbučio taškas be informacinių žymų: pavadinimo, adreso ir pan. Pagal svetainę, tai pavadnimas pasikeitė iš Linėja į... Spanida?
MapsInQuestion (2021-06-26 09:04:03+00:00): Joa, pamiršau pridėti pavadinimą :/ (Ką tik pridėjau)
Tomas Straupis (2021-06-26 18:39:47+00:00): Puiku, ačiū!
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 14:56:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108565276, 108568002 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mixture of edits that includes fantasy mapping and border vandalism.  Numerous attempts to engage with the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5233 et al.
streetuser (2021-06-26 09:00:52+00:00): Hier gibt es keine Höhenbeschränkung. Selbst gemessen? :)
fjensen (2021-06-26 09:18:32+00:00): Es ist an der Brücke keine Höhe ausgewiesen. Ich nehme an hier gilt dann die höchstzulässige Höhe für Kraftfahrzeuge. Oder was macht man in dem Fall?
fjensen (2021-06-26 09:33:17+00:00): Hat sich erledigt. Man lernt dazu ;)
streetuser (2021-06-26 11:18:11+00:00): Kein Problem, vier Augen sehen mehr als zwei, und ich mache auch genug Fehler :)
eggie (2021-06-25 19:05:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Владимир К (2022-02-06 11:11:31+00:00): Добрый день!
Не надо подписывать объекты описательными названиями. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия
Ville d'Aubange (2021-06-28 06:19:50+00:00): La rue de la Chapelle que vous indiquez et le nom de la rue sur le territoire communal de Musson. 
Sur le territoire communal d'Aubange le nom de la rue est Chemin Barolat.
La rue de la Chapelle sur le territoire communal d'Aubange se situe sur la N870, entre la rue du Moulin, et le croisement avec la N88.
Jakka (2021-06-28 06:34:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/737870745 et 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958755516
SHARCRASH (2022-06-30 20:06:38+00:00): Bonjour! Ces chemins ont également le panneau C3, càd interdiction au trafic routier normal dans les deux sens, sauf ayant droits, exception, etc... Donc unclassified ce n'est pas assez pertinent. Normalement il faut les mettre en "highway=track" (+ "tracktype=gradeX" si connu). C'est le plus pertinent étant donné que les vélos etc peuvent rouler sur un track selon la définition du Wiki d'OSM mais un véhicule agricole ne peut pas rouler sur une piste cyclable.
user_5359 (2021-06-26 05:20:34+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
AltMode=0
Base=0.0
Clamped=-1
Extruded=0
FolderPath=Track (4/13/21, 6:29:42PM)/Track (4/13/21, 6:29:42PM)
Name=Track (4/13/21, 6:29:42PM)
PopupInfo=New NE MTB
Shape_Leng=0.0189701825716
SymbolID=0
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys (!).
bdwillet (2021-06-28 16:26:50+00:00): I have not been able to see or edit since my upload so don't know about keys.  Source was my own GPS of the trail last week.
bdwillet (2021-06-28 16:29:35+00:00): Last month May
bdwillet (2021-06-28 19:01:15+00:00): Just updated a little - how does this look?
user_5359 (2021-06-30 16:28:11+00:00): The modification is correct, but what is the meaning of the meationed keys (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958255274)? Can I delete the keys?
user_11418917 (2021-06-25 22:02:05+00:00): STOP ADDING SPAM!! STOP!
mueschel (2021-06-28 15:13:26+00:00): Please check your edits, there are a couple ways with only foreign tags which are not part of a boundary.
e.g. http://osm.org/way/958257301
Recoil16 (2021-06-28 21:28:07+00:00): Danke, der muss mir durch die Lappen gegangen sein. Sollte jetzt passen.
DiogoBaptista98 (2025-11-30 04:55:14+00:00): Atribuir “rua sem nome” como valor da tag name é uma edição incorrecta. Quando a via não possui nome oficial, não se deve inserir uma descrição no campo name. Para assinalar que a rua não tem nome, utiliza-se a tag noname=yes. A linha 958257937 deve seguir estas boas práticas de mapeamento no OSM.
VRT OSM (2021-10-29 09:26:25+00:00): Hoi Frank,
Vraag wat is de reden dat je de wegen rond om de brandweer kazerne Glanerbrug hebt aangepast/ verwijderd? in het bijzonder de toegangsweg naar de Heidevlinder, dit is voor ons las huldienst belangrijk voor het navigatie systeem. bij een melding geeft deze aan of je links of rechts af moet naar het het incident adres.
Ze graag je reactie. 
groet Mike namens de VRT
FrankOverman (2021-10-29 10:27:42+00:00): Goh, dat is lang geleden en vele changesets geleden. Ik meen me te herinneren dat dit een BAG import aanvraag betreft. Dat is gericht op gebouwen en niet op wegen.
Hoe in deze changeset dan wegen zijn aangepast kan ik nu niet meer achterhalen: wat ik vermoed is dat wegen door BAG gebouwen heen liepen en daarom simpelweg niet kunnen kloppen.

Als iets niet momenteel klopt, volgens lokale survey, staat het eenieder vrij te corrigeren: dat is het mooie van OpenSource. Ik denk te zien dat dat al gebeurd is. Mooi.

Als ik nog even meedenk: ik zie ook een risico dat doorgaans privé wegen (opritten, service wegen op eigen terrein) niet in OSM staan. Aangezien het hier 'De Brandweer' betreft zal het wel meevallen en zal een mapper wss het wel laten staan.
VRT OSM (2021-11-01 06:34:44+00:00): Dank voor je reactie. 
Gr. Mike
user_11418917 (2021-06-25 22:01:42+00:00): Stop adding spam
Dayeong Lee (2021-06-25 18:36:25+00:00): #GoogleServe
borishag (2021-06-26 08:19:42+00:00): Kruidvat;

Openingstijden zijn al hersteld, gebruik voor het controleren van de stings altijd de evatuation tool om fouten te voorkomen: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
Andrea Musuruane (2021-06-26 12:25:30+00:00): Please don't use Bing aerial images in these zone because they are severely misaligned. Better use Esri Clarity. Thanks, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106979519
Javier Sanchez (2021-06-29 08:21:59+00:00): ¡Hola! ¡Bienvenido al apasionante mundo de OSM!
Cambio revisado.
Gracias por mejorar el mapa. ¡Buen trabajo!
arte2002 (2021-07-02 21:45:20+00:00): Parece que el nombre de la avenida no está bien escrito.
Javier Sanchez (2021-07-06 07:16:28+00:00): +1
watmildon (2023-11-03 17:43:48+00:00): Found the Love & Loss polygon while poking around. Nice work!
DressyPear4 (2021-06-25 19:45:36+00:00): Olá, por que você está adicionando via se no local já estão mapeadas?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106980040
gurglypipe (2021-06-25 20:31:53+00:00): Hi, what’s your reasoning for changing this to a footway? It’s part of the coast to coast cycle route.
mapbear66 (2021-06-25 20:50:50+00:00): Because it's a footbridge, cyclists have to dismount, and walk over. Perhaps it should have a cycleway tag?
gurglypipe (2021-06-25 20:53:35+00:00): It was already tagged as bicycle=dismount! I believe that, plus being tagged as a cycleway, is the correct tagging for a section of a cycleway where you have to temporarily dismount.

If it’s tagged as a footpath, bicycle routing engines won’t route bicycles over the bridge in the first place
gurglypipe (2021-06-25 21:31:26+00:00): I’ve changed it back to being a cycleway and I think the tagging is all correct now. Please jump in and improve on it if you think there’s more to do here. Thanks :)
mapbear66 (2021-06-25 21:34:37+00:00): Maybe that's a problem with the routing engines. It's a footbridge, and a very busy one for pedestrians. It's not a designated cycle track. It has bollards either end, low sides, as well as the dismount signs. 

It also doesn't look like any of the wiki examples of a cycleway. Perhaps you can justify it to me without just shouting routing engine.
mapbear66 (2021-06-25 21:37:20+00:00): So we can't discuss it sensibly?
gurglypipe (2021-06-25 21:44:28+00:00): I’m happy to discuss it, I went ahead with the changes because it seemed like you weren’t going to reply (given the speed of your original reply); obviously I was wrong about that. I have no intention to start an edit war. I am sorry if you thought I was shouting.

My argument is that this bridge is the route of NCN 71, so must by definition be a cycleway: https://osmaps.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/54.60368,-3.15547,16

I don’t think that means that cycles get priority, or that it gives them a right to ride over the bridge without dismounting. But I think those practical attributes should be tagged separately from the route’s legal status.

For example, the bollards could be mapped, and the fact that the bridge is not segregated for pedestrians and cyclists could be tagged with segregated=no.
mapbear66 (2021-06-25 21:57:12+00:00): Okay thank you for the further info. I was called away to do other things. 
I can go with the NCN making it a defacto cycleway despite not looking like one.
mapbear66 (2021-06-26 10:24:30+00:00): Actually, no I can't. This smacks of tagging for the router. "Dont tag for the renderer" applies just as much to routing. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer Fundamentally, map and tag what is there, not for the convenience of data users. 

This is a footbridge where cyclists have to dismount, i.e cross in pedestrian mode. It is not just for cyclists. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway for appropriate tagging.
Routers should still route over 'bicycle=yes', or 'bicycle=dismount' when the main highway tag is footway, or indeed use the relation.  If they don't, it is not incorrect tagging but a failure of their software.
gurglypipe (2021-06-26 11:10:04+00:00): What’s there is a cycle route, though. A legal route for bicycles, even if they have to dismount to do so.

A cycleway is the highest classification for this bridge (as it permits foot traffic and cycle traffic), so should be how it’s mapped: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Further_guidance_on_tagging_Public_Rights_of_Way_in_the_United_Kingdom#PRoW_runs_along_the_same_route_as_another_highway

Just because it’s narrow doesn’t mean it’s for feet only.

One complicating factor is that it seems the semantics of bicycle=dismount aren’t particularly concrete: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Ddismount, which means that using it in combination with highway=footway to indicate a designated cycle route might not be understood the intended way by various data consumers (or it might work fine, I don’t know). Using it in combination with highway=cycleway seems less ambiguous to me.

You obviously feel strongly about this, for some reason, so I’m not going to argue further or make further edits. I’ve made my points. Have a good weekend :)
Dodko (2021-08-08 10:43:44+00:00): Pridali ste reštauráciu ale už existovala ako bod vedľa od 5/2013, takže tzeraz je duplicitne, ten bod by sa mal zmazať.
Dodko (2021-08-08 10:45:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73041276
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-11 16:32:19+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700522483/history has tracktype = unknown that was added in this edit
Maybe it would be fine to remove it and keep tracktype= empty? That is fine for missing value
tarta (2021-06-25 22:07:02+00:00): Conjunto Dr. José Luiz da Conceição inserido com abreviação, procure, por favor colocar o nome completo, é o padrão da comunidade.
Obrigado e bom mapeamento.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106980424
eggie (2021-06-25 20:30:51+00:00): Beste Edwin.. Hoe kan nu de Trekvaart afgesloten zijn met een hek? Ook is het fysiek onmogelijk dat er een hek op een kruispunt staat.
Routeren doet het allemaal niet meer hier.
Hoort het hek niet op die toegangsweg?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=106980486
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-06-25 20:37:18+00:00): Het hek heb ik maar even zelf verplaatst, want anders is het foute boel bij de kaartupdates van vrijdagavond. 

MVG
eggie
Edwin's OSM (2021-06-26 03:57:51+00:00): Uiteraard hoort het hek op de toegangsweg.
Ik had dus eerst een punt moeten toevoegen en daar het hek aan koppelen ipv het eindpunt van de weg te pakken en daar aan te plakken.
m.vr.gr
Edwin
eggie (2021-06-26 05:32:42+00:00): Precies...  Dat zijn van die kleine dingetjes die de routering in de war schoppen. Het is nu weer goed. Er wordt je niets kwalijk genomen.

Mapse,
eggie
muralito (2021-06-26 18:58:06+00:00): Hola. Bienvenidos los aportes.

Las calles que dibujaste como esta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958270164 se dibujan asi si hay algo fisico en el medio de ese triangulo, si no va una sola linea que une las otras dos calles.
DressyPear4 (2021-06-25 20:38:47+00:00): Olá, você pode adicionar um nome antigo com a tag old_name=*
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106980624
Hungerburg (2023-03-20 10:52:20+00:00): Hallo Tramp, am Wochenende hab ich das untere Ende der aufgelassenen Materialseilbahn zum Garzahnmahd gefunden. Deine Peilung war ziemlich gut :)
DUGA (2022-09-04 13:01:51+00:00): Hey,

Changing a part of the PA-255 at this place to link makes no sense and it damages the routing.

I hope you will be careful next time, because doing this to major highways may easily result in a block.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875577518/history#map=19/41.13637/-78.69720
Stefan Paluch (2021-06-26 07:00:38+00:00): doceniam Twoje zaangażowanie, ale w tym miejscu jest przejście (widać je nawet na orto)
eggie (2021-06-25 20:25:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
DressyPear4 (2021-06-25 20:26:34+00:00): Olá, por que você está deletando todos esses objetos?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106982287
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-28 23:23:52+00:00): FYI - you can connect paths over water, just make sure you use bridge/tunnel, as appropriate.
tekim (2021-06-25 21:48:30+00:00): Hi!  Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for "editing and contributing", we need more of that!

I was wondering what your source was for for renaming "East South Frontage Road" to "Old US 66"?  You didn't cite a source that would support this.  The county GIS portal[0] shows this road as "E South Frontage Road"

[0] https://gisapp.willcountyillinois.com/Html5Viewer/Index.html?viewer=Data_Viewer
aweech (2021-06-26 16:31:37+00:00): Hi,
I decided to change Utah State Route 900 back to unclassified. While there is some language in the Wiki saying that state routes can be tagged as secondary, this route is a special case because it was only created for political reasons and connects no population centers.
ilikeeditingandcontributing (2021-06-27 18:37:29+00:00): source for old us 66 https://www.route66-map.com/
tekim (2021-06-28 00:08:49+00:00): Thanks for your reply, and again welcome to OSM!

First, don't be discouraged by the discussion here. As someone new to the project, you can't know everything about it on day one.  I recommend starting by mapping things you observe in person around the areas where you live and work, such as businesses, new subdivisions, etc.

In OSM we are not allowed to copy from other maps, like the one you cited as a source - unless it has a compatible license.  I don't think we can assume that is the case for the source you cited - especially since the source you cited uses a commercial web map.   

If you were to observe in person a sign along the road in question that said it was "Old Route 66" it could be mapped in OSM.  Routes (US highways, interstates, etc), are handled as relations in OSM.  There are already relations for Historic US 66, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3734410.  This applies to roads that are signed as "History US 66."  If your have a source with a compatible license that gives the actual location of old US 66 you could add a tag old_ref=US 66, but the official current name shouldn't be overwritten.
woodpeck (2021-06-26 10:45:43+00:00): Dear TLCastle, could you point us to some corroborating documents - eg news articles, web sites - for your claim that the state has demolished more than 50 residential homes in South Charleston, vis-a-vis the police campus where you recently repaired your map vandalism?
CountyRoads (2021-06-26 11:04:12+00:00): Google is a powerful and extremely useful tool. 

https://www.wsaz.com/2020/08/04/wsaz-investigates-jefferson-road-project-put-on-hold-more-than-9-months/
woodpeck (2021-06-30 16:58:42+00:00): Thank you. I hope you have also seen my comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106972777 and will soon remove the offensive and/or ridiculous information you have added to OSM.
SomeoneElse (2021-07-01 17:19:06+00:00): Hello İsmət_S,
Can you explain why you removed name:hy from https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11905748 here?
Also, please always use good changeset comments.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
Best Regards,
Andy
İsmət_S (2021-07-01 19:15:27+00:00): You are right, I should not remove name:hy. I was wrong about it. But name: tag has to be in Azerbaijani language.
SomeoneElse (2021-07-01 19:27:38+00:00): > But name: tag has to be in Azerbaijani language. 

Not necessarily - the relevant language for the "name" tag will be the one most used by people who live in the immediate area.  If you can link to evidence that that's changed from pre-2020 then please do so.
rthik007 (2021-07-08 09:19:09+00:00): Hi Leala Carbonneau,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with tertiary road way 500754735.
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107620263
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106983075
gileri (2021-06-30 16:55:09+00:00): Haha, le lendemain de mon changeset de retrait !

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106797945

https://www.leprogres.fr/economie/2021/06/24/peripherique-le-radar-est-de-retour-sur-le-virage-de-la-femme-morte
DressyPear4 (2021-06-26 09:25:58+00:00): Olá, ciclovia deve ser conectada com vias existentes, você também pode complementar as tags das vias existentes como nesse artigo
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106983409
literan (2021-06-28 20:40:58+00:00): забор уже отмечен, не надо наносить фейковые объекты
Viajero Perdido (2021-07-04 19:32:42+00:00): Hi Fracture98.

Sorry, I've had to revert this changeset, as it appears to have broken the river polygon all the way to Saskatchewan.

The river-area relation needs to be of type multipolygon (and have no name, as that's already on the waterway down the middle).  Note also that separately, there's a waterway relation gathering together all the waterway segments down the middle.  Unrelated to the river-area polygon.

Until you get more comfortable with relations, I'd recommend double-checking afterward that things still look right.  Cheers.
SomeoneElse (2021-06-25 21:03:35+00:00): There is a remaining gap in this relation at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1573819#map=18/53.94487/-1.90361&layers=H that needs surveying.