piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nammala (2017-04-17 07:18:56+00:00): Hi DrDarkNerd,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). The edits you have made have some tagging and editing errors like please don't add some fake parks and also don't give random names to the `name` tag. Also, tag swimming pool as `leisure=swimming_pool` not as `water=pond`. Please make sure you follow this from next time.
Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Regards,
nammala
Goffredo (2017-04-15 07:47:00+00:00): Ciao Ket85, scusami ma ho controllato con le immagini satellitari, e qui non mi pare ci sia un parco pubblico, tantomeno una strada con quese geometrie...
user_3216889 (2017-04-14 22:57:30+00:00): Welkom op OSM

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
user_3216889 (2017-04-14 22:59:49+00:00): Wijziging ongedaan gemaakt. Bij schuurtjes etc wordt geen straatnaam vermeld.
Hjart (2017-04-14 20:34:05+00:00): Dette vil ikke blive renderet vist på nogen kort, så det vil være bedst at blive ved det der var
Hjart (2017-04-29 06:34:15+00:00): Jeg har rettet tilbage, så skoven igen fremtræder på kort
sidsedahlin (2017-05-13 13:09:30+00:00): Hej Hjart, jeg mener at Landuse Forest ikke afspejler brugen, da man på deres wiki kan se, at det er til "skovbrug", altså at man dyrker træet for at fælde det til tømmer. Jeg var inde over Leisure og Nature Reserve (men ikke Park!) da jeg synes de i højere grad afspejler, hvad Årtusindskifteskoven bruges til: Gåture, fx med hunden, og så et grønt område med dyreliv i forbindelse med Lynge by.
sidsedahlin (2017-05-13 13:11:20+00:00): Kan tilføje at det er en kunstigt anlagt "skov", plantet i år 2000, deraf navnet. Ment til Leisure brug.
Hjart (2017-05-13 23:38:45+00:00): I praksis er der tale om et skovområde. Prøv ikke at tage beskrivelsen på vores wiki alt for højtideligt. Vi forsøger med et forholdsvist begrænset antal "standard tags" at dække et forholdsvist bredt antal anvendelser. Jeg forstår hvad du mener, men vi har simpelthen ikke et bedre bedre "standard tag" end dette.
demon_box (2017-04-15 13:21:22+00:00): ciao benvenuto :-), il vigneto di fronte alla Villa Martinengo non è un parco pubblico e tantomeno si chiama "parco delle colline" sebbene sia all'interno del ben più vasto Parco delle Colline.
inoltre hai tracciato una highway=pedestrian inesistente in mezzo al vigneto stesso.
infine anche il poligono area=yes intorno sempre al vigneto non significa nulla.
grazie.
demon_box (2017-04-15 13:33:52+00:00): ciao, chiedo scusa area=yes non è una modifica tua ma di un altro utente curiosamente nello stesso punto a distanza di qualche ora...
grazie.
BCNorwich (2017-04-24 14:19:37+00:00): Hello, Just wanted to let you know that you've inadvertently placed "Way: Buildings (486821331)" on top of existing buildings, or something went wrong. Also that area way has self intersections to the outline. Regards
Norma_O'Connor (2017-05-15 16:33:18+00:00): Hello, Thank U for your comment : )  Camden Fort Meagher is a Classical Costal Artillery Fortification dating form the 16th Century, currently a Tourist Attraction.  I was trying to capture  the changes, modifications and additions to the buildings and site throughout it's long history including the narrow gauge railway which runs along the pier and shoreline from maps, drawings, docunents and visual inspection.  I have dated these changes accordingly.  Kind Regards :  )
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2019-02-27 09:14:36+00:00): Hello again! It's great that you want to add historic features to OSM. But we should really try to tag them properly..
mueschel (2017-04-22 11:15:39+00:00): Hi,
the correct tag "addr:housenumber" was changed to the wrong tag "adr:housenumber" on 18.000 buildings in this city. Some of these changes where done in this changeset. 
Could you fix that - or let me know if you need help with it.

Cheers, Jan
user_3216889 (2017-04-14 23:15:09+00:00): Ongedaan gemaakt. Er is geen sprake van een caravan site in dit vakantiepark met villa's.
user_3216889 (2017-04-14 22:51:01+00:00): Teruggezet: leasure bestaat niet.
user_3216889 (2017-04-14 22:45:04+00:00): Teruggezet, was al aangeduid met leisure=park (met correcte spelling!)
chillly (2017-04-14 22:12:32+00:00): welcome to OSM

You first two edits are clearly doodles. I will revert (undo) them. 

We welcome new stuff from new mappers, but it must be real, in the right place and correctly described.
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-08-19 04:22:30+00:00): Hi,  Oreg. I changed geometry of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/486872782). Thank you
user_3216889 (2017-04-14 22:41:12+00:00): Gebruik highway=pedestrian enkel voor voetgangerszones in/nabij (winkel)centra.
Hier is beter: highway=footpath.
Commodoortje (2017-04-15 06:25:36+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-04-15 06:28:57+00:00): Je hebt hier tracks en path omgezet naar footway.
Weet je zeker dat hier alleen voetgangers mogen komen?
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47797570
Commodoortje (2017-04-15 06:30:41+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47798337
Je hebt 2x path aan gepast naar footway
Weet je zeker dat hier alleen voetgangers mogen komen?
dvdhoven (2017-04-15 09:35:03+00:00): Er staat bicycle=yes op de voetpaden en dat is correct. In Apeldoorn worden alle parken omgezet naar voetgangersgebied.
Het Matenpark is in 2015 omgegaan.
Dus alle paden zijn footway .
 Fietsen is toegestaan op de asfaltfietspaden. Dit is een asfalt pad en wel de hoofd fietsroute door het Matenpark.
Eigenlijk moeten alle asfaltpaden nog worden omgezet naar voetpad+bicycle=yes

Groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Commodoortje (2017-04-15 22:33:25+00:00): Ik zie in deze changeset geen bicycle=yes op de paden staan.
dvdhoven (2017-04-16 05:32:25+00:00): Dat kan kloppen, ik keek meer naar de hoofdfietsroute en die is door mij ooit al op footway + bicycle=yes gezet.
Of er bicycle=yes op deze paden moet, kun je alleen buiten zien. Grote kans dat dit halfverharde paden zijn en er dus niet op gefietst mag worden
Commodoortje (2017-04-16 06:15:37+00:00): Dank voor je uitleg, ik begrijp de situatie nu.
sommerluk (2017-04-18 22:42:11+00:00): Merci pour la contribution !
NonnEmilia (2017-04-16 21:34:46+00:00): Ciao Stefano, benvenuto in OSM!

Ho visto che hai inserito i nomi in queste due vie. Come convenzione la comunità italiana ha deciso di mettere nel tag `name` i nomi delle vie per intero ("Via Giacomo Matteotti"). Puoi mettere "Via Matteotti" nel tag `short_name`, fatto apposta per i nomi abbreviati, o nel tag `alt_name`, pensato per i nomi alternativi.

Un altro consiglio: siccome "Mirabello" è un nome proprio sarebbe più corretto mettere "Via Mirabello", con la "M" maiuscola.

Se hai domande scrivimi pure!
Commodoortje (2017-04-15 06:43:26+00:00): Ik heb een kleine verbetering aangebracht.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47805261
Gebruik geen tag name om een kenmerk te beschrijven.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice#Gebruik_geen_tag_name_om_een_kenmerk_te_beschrijven_.21
Hier kun je lezen hoe je een speeltuin in kaart brengt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=playground
Commodoortje (2017-04-15 06:46:12+00:00): Ook hier beetje hulp verleent.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47805360
Hjart (2017-04-15 07:15:13+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Jeg har rettet Skulpturparken, så træerne igen illustreres.
gileri (2017-04-15 08:04:06+00:00): Hello,

In order to make phone numbers usable for everyone, it's best to stick to the international format, such as :

+33 4 26 17 00 63

Spaces are for reading convenience and can be omitted.

More information here :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
keithonearth (2017-04-15 00:07:27+00:00): I probably should say that I took off the oneway=yes tag from the section of the sidewalk between the Mt Seymour Parkway & Lillooet Rd intersection and cross-walk across the Trans-Canada off ramp because there is no signage specifying it as oneway. The sidewall continues further south, and I left the oneway=yes tag on it as I am unaware of signage in this area.
TheOutpost (2017-04-22 02:02:14+00:00): Hi Dave, the rendering in OSM around these islands looks very odd. You know what's up?
AlaskaDave (2017-04-22 10:14:26+00:00): It's a rendering issue of some sort. I added Shuyak Island State Park using rough boundaries back in January. Coastllnes seem to be invisible with the current tagging using leisure=park although I can see them fine in my custom maps.
Just now I altered the tagging a bit to use boundary=protected_area and leisure=nature_preserve which is probably more correct. Let's see what difference that makes.
AlaskaDave (2017-04-25 19:42:55+00:00): I have spent the morning fixing errors in multipolygons and guess what? I redrew a portion of the coastline of Shuyak Island when I fixed up the Perevalnie Islands but forgot to add that new section to the coastline multipolygon. Rendering looks right now.
TheOutpost (2017-05-01 20:17:08+00:00): Hmm, still looks odd, though I wonder if the tiles are stale. Looks ok at certain zooms.
AlaskaDave (2017-05-02 01:33:21+00:00): It's most likely some sort of caching or currency problem with the OSM server. I'm sure it will render okay eventually.
Glassman (2017-04-15 01:48:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM - marking roads as private indicates that it is posted to allow only owners and others that are individually invited. If it's just a privately maintained road that anyone can use, you can add the tag operator=
Carnildo (2017-04-15 06:56:10+00:00): This one's an odd case: the county has the name as "Highland *Drive*", which would imply a public road ("Lane" denotes a privately-owned road), but the parcel map doesn't have a right-of-way for it, instead showing it as running on private property.  I don't recall a street sign at the intersection with Waikiki, which argues for a private road, and there is a large "Private Road" sign, but no "keep out" or similar sign.
Mike Chamberlain (2017-04-15 18:46:10+00:00): The roads in question "belong" to our little community of 37 homes -- The Highlands Homeowners Association of Spokane.  The history is a little complicated; details can be found here:  https://highlandsha.wixsite.com/highlandsha/history.

At present we are working with the new owners of the adjacent Country Club to segregate a portion of their parcel so that a strip of land for our access road, N Highlands Ln, will belong to our HOA.  We are in the process of ordering new signage to identify the access road (BTW, the change from Drive to Lane was recently approved by Spokane County) as being private and not a way for the public to get to the Country Club’s golf clubhouse.

I have been trying to get various online maps (Google, Bing, Mapquest) updated, with not yet much success.  Even the County SCOUT website (http://cp.spokanecounty.org/scout/map/) is slow to change.  Their default basemap "Topography" is still incorrect (it shows the label N Highlands Dr as extending into the community where N Country Club Dr should be).  However, their basemap "Imagery with Labels" is up to date.  And, now, also their "Open Street Map".
Glassman (2017-04-16 00:16:50+00:00): The SCOUT parcel information probably comes from the assessor's office while the basemap imagery with labels is from their gis data. Parcel data is strange. Skagit County has a road data layer that is made from parcels information. In places it is off by many feet. 

Keep up the great work updating and adding features to your HOA. For example adding in houses and buildings along with their address and for HOA buildings adding a name. Like name="Club House"
mavl (2018-12-25 21:00:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:37:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:28:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:43:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:21:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:52:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:19:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:33:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:11:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
srividya_c (2017-04-17 11:17:07+00:00): Hi fonziegamer,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thank you for your contribution. In this changeset you have added a trial with named Alamo River Trail - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486635895 which have few tags and that trial is not present in any imagery source. Can you please explain how you added this trial?

Happy to help

Thanks
Srividya
Weide (2017-04-15 05:12:42+00:00): Und nochmal: Bitte nicht pauschal in der ganzen Republik an alle railway=station-Nodes public_transport=station schreiben. public_transport=station ist kein Tag zur näheren Beschreibung von Betriebsstellen-Nodes. Die entsprechende Beschreibung bei openrailwaymap tagging ist Tag-Highjacking. Das Tag dient der Markierung einer FLÄCHE, die dem ZUGANG zum ÖPV GEWIDMET ist.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:33:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
MikeN (2017-04-15 17:29:05+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions!   A note about the end of Sawblade Ridge - a "Living Street" is normally a pedestrian area that allows cars only at 3-5 MPH.   I would expect the end of this street to terminate in a turning circle instead of a living street.  Also is it really 1 lane?  That would mean that if 2 cars meet, one would need to back up to an open area for them to pass.   Thank you,
HedCheeeeese (2017-04-15 22:35:28+00:00): Its 25 mph, its an unmarked paved road, wide enough for two cars so I guess it counts as two lanes. Theres no distinction and Everton just drives on whichever side or straight up the middle until the come upon another car. The end is a turning circle but its small and there are homes around it. I'm new to open street maps so I didn't know how to mark all that. There are two homes at the end and about nine occupied lots all told, the rest is unsold lots that have stayed in their wooded state.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:03:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Supaplex (2017-05-12 08:52:39+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
literan (2017-04-15 12:01:06+00:00): вы неправы https://www.facebook.com/pizzelove.ru/
opendcc (2017-04-15 10:39:20+00:00): Hallo Guido,

was war da kaputt? Wenn das ein Kreis ist, dann sind doch die Relationen über den Kreisverkehr hinweg an dieser Stelle defekt, da es immer einmal komplett rumgeht.

Servus Wolfgang
gscholz (2018-01-22 21:02:32+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang,
ich habe gerade mehr zufällig (und sehr spät) deinen Kommentar entdeckt. Der ist irgendwie nicht bei mir direkt angekommen. 
Kreisverkehre bleiben bei Relationen immer als ein Stück erhalten. Bitte nicht zerlegen. Einfach mal bei JOSM in die Liste der Relationsmitglieder schauen.
Gruß
Guido
nammala (2017-04-17 07:44:07+00:00): Hi GDP100,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding fake parks and waterbody which doesn't seem to in the imagery. Please don't add fantasy data. Make sure you add proper data. 

Regards,
nammala
dudka (2017-04-19 20:00:17+00:00): чому видалено ділянки доріг?
novoetaxi (2017-04-19 20:05:57+00:00): Не удалены, а исправлены. Была неправильная стыковка улиц Гагарина и Патриотической
novoetaxi (2017-04-19 20:07:19+00:00): Улица Патриотическая имеет две ветки, а Гагарина заканчивается на торце дома № 12
dudka (2017-04-19 20:07:32+00:00): Тут наглядно видно що було видалено http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47804895
dudka (2017-04-19 20:08:44+00:00): виїзди на Гагаріна з дворів і з вул. Яценка обрізано
novoetaxi (2017-04-19 20:09:32+00:00): упс... не заметил
Chrysopras (2017-04-15 06:57:08+00:00): Ich habe erst nach dem Hochladen kapiert, was hier wirklich gelaufen war (sorry), daher habe ich diese Änderung nochmals verbessert: siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47805575
VARVAR8 (2018-03-12 07:48:09+00:00): навіщо видаляти? Ти не думав що можна просто взяти GPS і зняти дані. Чому зразу гугл?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/47804975
user_630853 (2018-03-12 14:33:38+00:00): Якщо ви не зауважили я їх не видаляю, я їх роюлю правильними, я видаляю footway що не правильним позначення тротуарів а на цих вулицях ставлю sidewalk. Видно коли робили не правильно то замість розділити ці шляхи то зробили одною лінією, тому це також видалилося. Я вже писав на форумі що правки ще не закінчені це все виправиться
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/47804975
eggie (2017-04-15 07:09:12+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-15 07:14:50+00:00): Bij nieuwbouw graag doorgeven aan het forum van OSM via Verzoek bag-import

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Commodoortje (2017-04-15 09:02:22+00:00): Hoi cormaars,

Inderdaad, deze appartementen zijn gesloopt. De adresnodes had je laten staan, deze mogen als ze gebouwen niet meer aanwezig zijn ook verwijdert worden. Inmiddels heb ik dit voor je gedaan.
Ook heb ik nog wat appartementen verwijdert.
Hier kun je zien wat ik verwijdert heb.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47808185
mavl (2018-12-25 19:21:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:24:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:18:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Hjart (2017-04-15 08:40:20+00:00): Jeg ville normalt anbringe en layer=1 på broen og på den måde undgå unødigt at klippe vejen op
Goffredo (2017-04-15 07:41:50+00:00): Ciao Ferruccio, il tag name non deve essere usato per contenere la descrizione dell'oggetto. Per quello esiste il tag description (in inglese) e description:it (in italiano).
name=no significa che il nome proprio del capanno di caccia è "no", e ciò non è vero.
Lo stesso vale sulle macine del mulino a nave: se avessero un nome proprio allora va messo nel tag name, altrimenti no.

Ciao e buona pasqua
Hjart (2017-04-15 08:37:08+00:00): Please note that specific tags for this exists (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling) and that I have replaced your names with these
Владимир К (2017-04-17 08:25:42+00:00): не стоит подписывать в название. тега sport вполне достаточно
demon_box (2017-04-15 13:15:09+00:00): ciao, la descrizione dell'oggetto è già nel tag description:it e non va messa nel tag name perchè non è un nome proprio.
grazie.
StalkerOSM (2018-01-22 12:46:49+00:00): Z tego co wiem, ten szczyt jest bezimienny. Ługowina to zwyczajowa nazwa przysiółka będącego częścią Kowalowej
Rzezimierz (2018-01-22 13:35:29+00:00): Cześć,
ogólnie są to dane wzięte z Państwowego Rejestru Nazw Geograficznych - i taka nazwa tam widnieje. Fajnie by było to zweryfikować chociażby w Słowniku turystyki geograficznej Sudetów, ale nie zaopatrzyłem się jeszcze w tom dotyczący Gór Kamiennych ;( Spróbuję to jeszcze dodatkowo zweryfikować w innych źródłach.
Rzezimierz (2018-01-22 13:38:07+00:00): Messtichblatt nic nie wie również o takiej górze - w okolicy widać tylko Wachberg czyli Stóżysko oraz Ostrosz (Spitzberg). Dzięki za czujność, usunę ją dzisiaj - pozostaje tylko kwestia faktu jej dalszego istnienia w PRNG :)