piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leo Slager (2018-09-22 21:05:54+00:00): Zo'n schrijffout heeft de gewoonte om zich snel te verspreiden over allerlei afgeleide bronnen.
Maar er is slechts 1 officiële schrijfwijze vastgesteld door de gemeente. In dit geval is dat dus het lidwoord met een kleine letter. Zie ook PDOK, BGT. Zie ook de naastgelegen wegen de Steeg en van Pallandtlaan. Kijk verder ook maar eens op de straatnaamborden. Dat kan zeer leerzaam zijn !
Ik heb de wijzigingen ongedaan gemaakt.
AgusQui (2018-09-21 21:42:01+00:00): Tené cuidado al unificar ways, pueden contener relaciones que representan otras cosas. Tuve que corregir las relaciones del limite de localidad de Pinzón y el área urbana que rompiste.
b-jazz (2018-09-21 21:04:43+00:00): Thanks for the submission to OpenStreetMap. I've tweaked a few of the values to be more inline with OSM standards and naming. You might want to move the node closer to a building that a customer might approach when visiting though instead of the middle of the yard.
Hjart (2018-09-21 10:17:18+00:00): Hejsa. Jeg har tilladt mig at føre de relevante wiki links tilbage
Hjart (2018-09-21 10:20:09+00:00): Undlad iøvrigt også at slette vores importerede adressenoder. De bliver bare genimporteret.
berndw (2018-09-22 08:51:41+00:00): Hallo

Bitte keine Fläche einfach so über andere Bei BING und bei ESRI ist hier nur Wald zu erkennen, also möchte ich die Existenz eines Ackers bezweifeln, bitte korrigiere das.
Carto'Cité (2018-09-21 14:01:46+00:00): Bonjour Nicogg,
Je me permet de te contacter pour t'informer que les pistes cyclables queu ajoutes ne représentent pas des contributions corrects. Ne le prend surtout pas mal, c'est très bon que tu t'intéresses aux aménagements cyclables dans OSM mais c'est relativement complexe et il y pas mal de chose à corriger dans ta pratique. Premièrement, je pense qu'il s'agit d'une bande cyclable et pas d'une piste cyclable (ça reste à vérifier) ; la route contient déjà l'information comme quoi elle comprend une piste cyclable. Deuxièmement, il ne faut pas tracer de cheminement comme ça sans tenir compte du reste, il faut rattacher correctement le nouveau way aux autres là ou il y a une intersection. Voilà, regarde cette page du wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle
Je te conseil quelques contributions un peu plus simples dans un premier temps et prends le temps d'observer comment souvent décrit les aménagements. N'hésite pas à nous contacter si tu as besoin d'aide. L'association MDB compte quelques contributeurs qui pourront t'aider également.
Bon courage.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour le projet #CartoVeloIDF
Dimacn (2019-07-11 03:13:11+00:00): Пакет отменён. Не следует оформлять дворовые территории как парки отдыха. Подробнее: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park 2. В name пишем только официальные названия https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
ika-chan! (2018-09-21 18:17:03+00:00): Hi, only the A8 east of the Korinthos interchange is part of the E94 European road. Source: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/vylF_ZADdYCOnrdxWcyuHA
user_4785031 (2018-09-21 18:33:58+00:00): I let it as it was. Wherever i found EO8α I just placed a dot. I didnt make this numbering.
Anyway, i think,  the sign is about ΠΕΟ8 (old national highway).
As I long as i remeber we used to travel on this way to go near to Patras, when it was ΕΟ8
alesarrett (2022-10-03 04:56:12+00:00): What this areas is about? Why a name for an area=yes way?
Ger Walsh (2018-12-24 00:58:30+00:00): Hi McCann,
Hope you are well. I see a few problems with your changeset here, and I'm going to start reversing some of those changes soon.

I see this is your first changeset too. OSM wouldn't work without people signing up & learning how to use it - I assume that was your intention. There's sometimes (not too often) meetups and map-athons etc. and openstreetmap can be an amazing resource, free and open source, for anyone to use.

Unfortunately, at the same time, there are some services (wayfinding for instance) and there might be an issue with mistakenly directing someone to a hospital in the wrong location.

If you have any questions for me, don't hesitate to ask.
Polarbear-repair (2018-09-24 10:41:05+00:00): revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in CS 62875161 and 62875241
Polarbear-repair (2018-09-24 10:40:56+00:00): revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in CS 62875161 and 62875241
ndm (2018-09-21 22:07:53+00:00): It would be great if you could have a longer changeset comment -- it's a pain to try to have to click on a single .
Polarbear-repair (2018-09-24 10:40:34+00:00): revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in CS 62875161 and 62875241
Polarbear-repair (2018-09-24 10:40:27+00:00): revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in CS 62875161 and 62875241
Polarbear-repair (2018-09-24 10:40:20+00:00): revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in CS 62875161 and 62875241
StephaneP (2018-09-26 16:47:08+00:00): Bonjour Nicogg, et bienvenu parmi les contributeurs à OpenStreetMap.
Je vois que tu as ajouté des pistes cyclables, comme celle-ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627135977

Si l'imagerie aérienne est correcte, alors il ne s'agit pas d'une piste cyclable, mais d'une bande cyclable. Cette information s'ajoute directement sur la route. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/604537681
ce sont les tag cycleway:right=lane
et cycleway:left=lane

J'ai fait les corrections.

Plus généralement, pour savoir comment ajouter tout ce qui concerne la cyclabilité,  les infos sont ici :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

On est d'accord, ça peut paraitre assez complexe :-)

Bon mapping !
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Polarbear-repair (2018-09-24 10:40:13+00:00): revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in CS 62875161 and 62875241
Polarbear-repair (2018-09-24 10:40:07+00:00): revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in CS 62875161 and 62875241
DaveF (2018-09-22 16:55:02+00:00): Hello Welcome to OSM & all that, but this is utter rubbish. Please map responsibly.
Polarbear-repair (2018-09-24 10:40:01+00:00): revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in CS 62875161 and 62875241
DaveF (2018-09-22 16:57:50+00:00): How can cul-de-sacs be oneway? Please stop fantasy mapping
Polarbear-repair (2018-09-24 10:39:54+00:00): revert 10 first Changesets by new user, creating fictious objects in Antarctica, changing local roads to motorways, and cul-de-sacs to oneways. Reverts in CS 62875161 and 62875241
Rodrigo Rega (2018-09-21 18:11:47+00:00): Hola Asteriscos,

Veo que has añadido una área etiquetada como parque dentro del parque de Rosalía de Castro de Lugo. Es innecesario ya que el parque ya estaba mapeado. Voy a proceder a borrar dicha área.

Un saudo y bienvenido a OpenStreetMap.
kayle (2018-09-25 12:34:57+00:00): Zdravím.
Čo presne to je za miesto? Je tam aj nejaký objekt?
Vyložene zle to nie je označené , len som zvedavý či sa to nedá upresniť.
(no minimálne "religion" by bolo vhodné doplniť.)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
VictorIE (2018-10-14 11:45:07+00:00): For the Eir store, operator=Eircom or operator=Eir ?
Vincent de Phily (2018-10-27 21:14:33+00:00): Don't really know, how would I check ? The shop front says "Eir", I thought these were all marketing names or subcompanies of "Eircom", but they're very hard to follow.
VictorIE (2018-10-27 21:53:37+00:00): AFAIK, the company registered in the Channel Islands(?) is Eir. A search of https://search.cro.ie/company/CompanySearch.aspx shows about 70 different Irish-registered companies and registered business names under both Eir and Eircom.

I have almost all their other assets (except street_cabinet, phone lines and poles) tagged as Eir:
Eir (231), 
Eircom (1), 
Eircom Wholesale (3).
Vincent de Phily (2018-10-29 20:27:42+00:00): You've got a better grasp of it than I do, I'll let you edit to "Eir" if that's correct. I might photomap it tomorrow, this whole area could do with poi updates.
letihu (2019-03-07 11:50:34+00:00): Warum wird denn dieses große Gebiet
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88873630/history
als Multipolygon, mit nur einem Mitglied, gemappt?
Enzyklopädix (2019-03-07 14:59:21+00:00): Gute Frage. Vermutlich gibt es keinen Grund. Kann höchstens sein, dass zwei Flächen verbunden wurden und dabei das Multipolygon entstand.
letihu (2019-03-07 19:12:09+00:00): Das kann sein. Wenn man was teilt, gehört einem dieses plötzlich.
Commodoortje (2018-09-22 07:49:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Commodoortje (2018-09-22 08:03:19+00:00): Ik heb de gegevens inmiddels naar de adresnode verplaatst. 
POI op een adresnode heeft meerdere voordelen. De aanwezige node shop=supermarket heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.
Commodoortje (2018-09-22 08:04:03+00:00): Hier kun je mijn wijzigingen zien:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=62818360
Commodoortje (2018-09-22 08:09:56+00:00): Je kunt nog wat aanvullingen op de adresnode zetten, lees evt hier wat je kunt verbeteren.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=supermarket
cMartin (2018-09-27 08:22:17+00:00): Die Club-Knoten waren bereits vorhanden. Ich habe deine Dopplung wieder gelöscht.
majkaz (2018-09-21 12:30:03+00:00): Ahoj, 
dovoluji si upozornit, že se Ti v Municích podařilo odmazat existující budovy, tak jak byly zakreslené byly převážně správně.
Fakt není dobře se spoléhat jen na ruian.
Ty statky jsou v ruianu většinou blbě, můžeš si to zkontrolovat přes mapy.cz
JandaM (2018-09-21 13:42:41+00:00): Diky za info. mam asi udelam revert.
JandaM (2018-09-21 13:49:14+00:00): Revert delat nebudu. Neco opravim. Problem je v tom ze obrys statku je posunuty a neodpovida obrysu z RUIAN. Ocividne je to obkreslene podle ortofota s chybou 1-2m. To je pro me moc velka chyba. Davam prednost datum z RUIAN a skutecny stav na tom kdo to mistne zna.
majkaz (2018-09-21 14:01:24+00:00): Ne, posun tam opravdu není a netuším podle čeho na něj usuzuješ. To zakreslení je dobře, podívej se na katastrální mapu.
A na místě to osobně znám, fakt to odpovídá spíš tak, jak to bylo.
Blbě tam věci jsou, ale jen v tom, že tam budovy chybí (co nejsou ani v tom RUIANu), nebo je ubouraná část budovy, ale v KM a RUIANu je pořád vedená budova celá. 
Můžu to někdy příští týden opravit, ale teď na to čas nemám.
JandaM (2018-09-21 14:15:25+00:00): Priklad posunute a obkreslene budovy: wayID=627170882. Jinak skupina budov v prave casti obce jsou take posunute. Napr. wayID = 228266929 je posunute o 0.9m oproti referenci. Je tam takove docela prapodivne zkresleni. Jako by to nekdo maloval od ruky. A musim se priznat ze umelecka dila v datech nemam rad.
Dekuji pokud provedes opravu podle skutecnosti, ale prosim nejdrive zkontroluj jestli to sedi s pozici v RUIAN budovy a parcely.
majkaz (2018-09-21 14:25:35+00:00): Na ty Munice se podívám příští týden.
Není mi jasné proč trváš zrovna na RUIANu, o kterém vím, že obsahuje daleko víc chyb než vrstva katastrální mapy. Stačí se podívat, kolik hlásím chyb.
V podstatě je to fuk, protože beru vždy obojí a k tomu ještě lpis, který bývá z toho všeho nejpřesnější ohledně toho, kde končí pole a kudy jdou cesty. Ale nechápu...
JandaM (2018-09-21 14:29:41+00:00): Diky za tip. Katastrofalni mapy proverim. Bohuzel OSM nema moznost oznacit stav dat objektu. Napr. import/potrebuje kontrolu/overeno/hotovo - zamknuto
majkaz (2018-09-21 14:37:57+00:00): OSM přece má možnost označit chybu RUIAN. Co je tohle? http://ruian.poloha.net/neplatne-budovy/

Je na to plugin Point Info, přes který to jde hlásit.
majkaz (2018-09-21 14:10:24+00:00): Prosím Tě, tohle taky není úplně dobře. Ta tvoje zeleň je oplocená, přístup na ní z větší části není. Patří to domovu důchodců.
JandaM (2018-09-21 14:26:05+00:00): Zelen je z RUIAN lands/parcely. A neprijde mi uplne spatne. Vysec kruhu odpovida ceste ale ze snimku neni jasne ktere strane cesty.. A OSM se znaci cesty/silnice normalne pres zelen a lesy. Neni to uplne komplet, ale lepsi podklad neni. A neni to kresleno rucne. Takto se obcas projevi jak jsou silnice/cesty posunute uplne mimo.
Problem je v tom ze RUIAN parcely/lands nejsou konzistentni a zelene plochy zasahuji do chodniku a silnic.
majkaz (2018-09-21 14:27:05+00:00): Ale na místě to neznáš. Já ano, a říkám ti, že to veřejná plocha není.
JandaM (2018-09-21 14:38:32+00:00): To se omlouvam, v tom pripade se jedna o "Common Tagging Mistakes" nevim jestli by se mohl upravit Tracer na doplneni mene "agresivniho" tagu. Musim se priznat ze pro me ma vyznam spis to ze se jedna o zelenou plochu s travou nez ze je verejne nepristupna.
pangoSE (2018-09-22 10:32:00+00:00): Bra jobbat! Välkommen till OSM.
Visst är det kul?
Mvh
Egil
PS: Gå gärna med i en Telegram-chat, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts
Finns även en specifikt för SE.
Hjart (2018-09-21 13:14:05+00:00): Jeg har rettet fvst:name tagget tilbage, idet stedet stadig går under det navn på http://www.findsmiley.dk/91783
AdVerburg (2018-09-24 10:00:04+00:00): Bij en op de Zuidhavenpoort is het wegtype veranderd naar pedestrian. Pedestrian is correct als er borden G07 (rond blauw met voetganger) staan, zonee dan is dat fout en moet dus veranderd worden.
(Fiets-knooppunt routes gaan over die brug, en fietsen op wandelwegen mag niet…)
Wat te zien is op (oudere) foto's is dat het daar geen éénrichting verkeer is, daarom horen die tags oneway:bicycle, oneway:moped etc. weggedaan te worden.
Vestrin (2018-09-24 17:23:09+00:00): Hallo Ad,

Dank voor je opmerkingen! Ik ben verder gegaan met de rest van de binnenstad in mijn achterhoofd. Deze straten zijn ook allemaal van het type: pedestrian, echter mag je hier ook gewoon fietsen (en zelfs autorijden tussen bepaalde tijden).

Is er een soort Slack voor OSM, of moet ik me dan toch richting Telegram bewegen?

Groet,

Pieter-Jan
AdVerburg (2018-09-24 19:04:53+00:00): Dag Pieter-Jan,
Telegram noch Slack kende ik niet, en zover *ik* weet niet in gebruik bij/op OSM.
Wel is er de mogelijkheid voor mappers om via het OSM-account onderling berichten met een andere mapper uit te wisselen.
Daarnaast is het publieke platform https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 waar je met je gebruiksnaam en wachtwoord inlogt wanneer je daar ook wilt schrijven. (lezen kan iedereen.)
--------------------
De Appelmarkt, Mol enz. zijn naar mijn idee onvolledig of mogelijk onjuist getagd. Dat hangt van de verkeersborden af hoe dat zou moeten. Een voorbeeld in Goes is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7603628
Een straat waar je wel altijd mag fietsen is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/530316021
Succes met je map-activiteiten.
Groetend, Ad
VitalieS (2018-09-23 23:37:04+00:00): Mag34 ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62795998
wambacher (2018-09-22 11:08:37+00:00): why did you delete the admin boundary of Al Jawf Region?

never ever delete objects, you don't know about.

will be reverted right now.

walter/germany
SimonPoole (2018-09-21 13:47:40+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM. 
Why do you believe that the place value in this edit and your previous ones should be changed to city? At least from aerial imagery there is no indication that the previous value was wrong.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62796255
SimonPoole (2018-09-22 12:27:00+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1236739661
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62796387
SimonPoole (2018-09-21 13:58:36+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place for more information on appropriate place tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62796463
NetWormKido (2018-09-21 14:09:08+00:00): Откатил. В OSM в поле name заносится только имя собственное.
szalona_entropia (2018-10-19 14:05:13+00:00): Motorway should have two separate carriageways. This is not a motorway.
rick74 (2018-10-19 14:59:20+00:00): i see your argument. on osm-wiki is written, that motorways "TYPICALLY have at least two lanes in each traffic direction with some degree of separation". in my point of view that isnt an argument to exclude, that this isnt a motorway. what is more, i want to point out, that the official name of that street is "D3", so called like every other motorway (Dx) in slovakia and as a truck-driver you have to pay toll, like he drives on an other motorway.
szalona_entropia (2018-10-19 17:19:40+00:00): Tolls have nothing to do with a road being a motorway or not.
General standard on the OSM map of Europe is that single carriageway roads are not "motorways". Especially if they are not officially signed as such (and this section of D3 is not signed with the "motorway" road sign).
This road has the same exact parameters as its continuation in Poland. Both of them should be tagged "trunk" until the 2nd carriageway gets built.
kayle (2018-10-22 04:52:24+00:00): Where are no sign https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%BAbor:Dopravn%C3%A1_zna%C4%8Dka_IP23a.svg ?
NDS (something as National Motorway/Highway Company) have this categorised as motorway.

In this document from SCC (translated like Slovak Road Administration) on page 6 are motorways. Trunk roads are on page 8. 
http://www.cdb.sk/files/documents/cestna-databanka/vystupy-cdb/2018/kniha_miestopis_2018_01-01.pdf
.
D3: crossing D1 x D3 district Žilina - crossing D3 x I/11, ring road Žilina, crossing I/11 x D3,  district Čadca - state boundary SR/ PL
and total length 28,052 km
.
Where are 2 parts
1st part - From Dolný Hričov (near airport) crossing with D1 (D1 is not finished), continuing to Žilina, over Váh river and ends with crossing primary road I/11
2nd part - crossing with primary road I/11 near Svrčinovec and continue until state border
kayle (2018-10-22 04:54:02+00:00): Well, small error not SCC but SSC (Slovenská Správa Ciest)
szalona_entropia (2018-10-22 17:42:42+00:00): Look at the sign in the first seconds of this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC_HlqyB8Wk It is this sign: https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%BAbor:Dopravn%C3%A1_zna%C4%8Dka_IP22a.svg

Also do not confuse the formal road classification (D or R in Slovakia) with highway types in OSM. In fact, both "D" and "R" roads in Slovakia can be tagged as "motorway" as long as they have two separate carriageways and no at-grade intersections.

But please do not tag roads with single carriageways as "motorways".
Let motorways be motorways
rick74 (2018-10-23 07:50:45+00:00): So, you guys want me to change it back into 'trunk'?
kayle (2018-10-23 08:10:47+00:00): szalona_entropia: OK, I ask if are where no IP23 signs on road.
Formal road classification is... well... formal, but reality could be different (like this road) and I don't have problem to change tagging (well, depends case by case)
And I read on osm wiki "
* Generally resemble a controlled access road and must be free from intersection controls (such as traffic-signals, rotaries and roundabouts, and stop signs or stop markings);
* Typically have at least two lanes in each traffic direction with some degree of separation;
* Have access roads only for servicing purposes, such as a limited number of driveways serving non-residential property, service roads to infrastructure, or rest-area roads or bays, which may be more typical in regional or rural settings
.
For roads which do not meet the above requirements consider using highway=trunk" 
So consider. It's up to agreement if yes or no. And yes, it could exist difference between countries.

rick74: well, this will always be problem to debate (more like endless debate), but I think trunk. If they used IP22a signs.
szalona_entropia (2018-10-23 19:53:24+00:00): I don't think there is anything to debate on. It is a standard on the OSMap of Europe that only proper motorways with two carriageways are tagged as "motorway".

About this part "For roads which do not meet the above requirements consider using highway=trunk" "
My interpretation is that such roads are not motorways, and you should tag them otherwise. Consider using "trunk", as it is probably the most suitable.
NetWormKido (2018-09-21 14:10:31+00:00): Откатил. В OSM в поле name заносится только имя собственное.
viloan (2018-09-21 13:04:15+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Minh Nguyen (2018-11-20 21:17:29+00:00): This changeset incorrectly changed the name of an airport to that of one of its service roads. Fixed in changeset 64714662.
Lokai (2018-09-21 14:55:48+00:00): Ahoi Fritze,

so wie es jetzt kartiert ist, befindet sich die Firma im gesamten Gebäude. Korrekt so? Fax-Nummer enthält ein /
Hokkosha (2018-10-08 22:39:34+00:00): Hello. What is these 6 grids without tag? It doesn't seem geographic feature.
RAytoun (2018-10-09 01:42:32+00:00): Hello Hokko-sha, I had selected multiple task squares on the HOT Tasking Manager to check road classification and rivers in that area for validation. It appears that the Task square boundaries have uploaded along with the amendments I made. That should not have happened and I will check why it did. I have deleted them. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
Hokkosha (2018-10-09 09:43:43+00:00): Hello RAytoun, I understand it and I saw deleted it. Thank you for your mapping in Hokkaido!
GerdP (2018-09-29 08:02:11+00:00): Hi! Why did you change the tags of these two ways to the unusual highway=different?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/609082358
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312943181