piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
divaddivag (2022-07-20 19:41:21+00:00): Pas de soucis! Je suis passé par Norrey il y 2 jours et fais les corrections adéquates. N'hésites pas si tu as des questions et surtout continues à contribuer. bien à toi. David
*abq* (2022-07-29 06:57:09+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier im Feldberggebiet mehrere Wege von bicycle=no oder ohne tag auf bicycle=yes umgetagged.
Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass keine entsprechende Beschilderung vorhanden ist. 
Was ist der Grund für dein Umtaggen?
VG Reiner
skyper (2022-08-02 20:12:15+00:00): Hi Udo,
ist Dir bewusst, dass es sich hier um ein Naturschutzgebiet mit eigenen Regeln handelt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460048029)? Bei einer Breite unter 2m ist Radfahren definitiv nicht erlaubt und muss explizit erlaubt sein. Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123512343.
VG skyper
Frans S (2022-07-08 14:16:36+00:00): reverted due to poor mapping
Frans S (2022-07-08 14:17:13+00:00): Reverted due to poor mapping quality
Benoît C MdP (2022-07-06 06:23:54+00:00): Bonjour

C'est nouveau ce double sens cyclable sur la rue du Château des Rentiers ? Je n'avais pas le souvenir qu'il y en avait un la dernière fois que j'y suis passé.... 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1881556

Merci

Benoît
Benoît C MdP (2022-07-06 13:43:25+00:00): Bonjour Jenny,

C'est vraiment à double sens pour les vélos ?

Merci

Benoît
azakh-world (2022-07-11 13:48:13+00:00): Hello.
You should not remove objects and create copies instead. The first reason is that this nullifies the object history in OSM. Another, more critical error is that objects are often members of relations, like subway station nodes are members of subway route relations. After your changes M2 line lost 4 stations, and metro scheme is now incorrect in OSM-based applications.
I'll recover route relations for this time.
azakh-world (2022-07-11 14:18:13+00:00): Please use this validation page https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/italy.html
okadatsuneo (2022-07-05 14:21:41+00:00): MTNARUTOさん、こんにちは。
最近のバスリレーションではウェイのforward/backward指定は不要となっていますので、なくて良いと思いますよ。
naruton (2022-07-08 02:24:30+00:00): ご助言を頂きありがとうございます。
Frans S (2022-07-09 14:43:14+00:00): Hello. I reverted most of the buildings due to poor mapping quality
Best regards
Frans S (2022-07-09 15:02:03+00:00): Hello. I reverted most of the buildings due to poor mapping quality
Best regards
JJIglesias (2022-07-05 16:25:14+00:00): Un Modulo Policial No es Fast_Food. Por favor NO MEZCLEN Etiquetas (Tags). Ya hice la correccion, pero si se siguen comentiendo estos errores por NO prestar atencion antes de Salvar los Cambios. Voy a Revertir cada cambio q hagan mal y todo su trabajo se va a ir al tacho. Fijense bien en lo q estan haciendo antes de salvar y subir data.
Gracias
mariotomo (2022-07-05 21:28:24+00:00): sugerencia sobre los comentarios a los conjuntos de cambios: formular como oración completa, con sujeto, verbo de acción, y objeto. digo, por lo menos. mucho mejor si quisieran explicar las intenciones en mejor detalle.
"postgrado geografía" … en qué sentido, disculpe?
mariotomo (2022-07-05 21:38:35+00:00): revise usted mismo, con osmcha:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/123238778/
(no es buena práctica poner dos valores en una misma clave. más probable que se trate de dos entidades diferentes dentro del mismo edificio.)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123238778
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-29 05:12:36+00:00): Hello!

You used
amenity=event_venue
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9868411118/history

Have you maybe meant
amenity=events_venue
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
zby-cz (2025-05-03 20:20:13+00:00): Hi Mateusz, thanks for you care of the data! Yes this was definitely a typo. I fixed it now. 

Kind regards, Pavel from osmapp.org
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-04 06:05:27+00:00): and thanks for your fix!
eggie (2022-07-05 15:40:39+00:00): Dag earlytistimeless   De landuse industrial en residential heb ik weer losgemaakt van de Achterwei. 
Beter geen vlakken aan de wegen plakken.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123238943

MVG
eggie
WoSoe (2022-07-05 17:39:27+00:00): Hast du gesehen, dass an den ways ein placement=right_of:1 vorhanden ist?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:placement%3Dright_of:1
Damit hat die Position eigentlich gepasst.
mariotomo (2022-07-05 18:53:53+00:00): hi. welcome to OSM! please review this action, and understand how you managed to tell the community you're editing in Bangladesh, while covering all of Central America, most of the Caribbean, Colombia, Ecuador, half of Venezuela, and most of US Southern States.
kamal2022 (2022-07-19 08:13:16+00:00): Thanks bud for your edit
Kurdistan-Map (2022-07-27 11:14:54+00:00): kamal2022 Problem hhh
jodd (2022-11-14 19:08:27+00:00): Hi liamrocker, 
the toilet is currently situated outside the building. Do you mean the customer toilet of the EDEKA supermarket? If yes, I suppose to add it as a feature to the supermarket and not as an own POI.
Greets, jodd
liamrocker (2022-11-14 19:22:50+00:00): Hi jodd, I must confess, I'm not completely sure anymore since this was some months ago. But I am pretty sure it is not located outside but inside the Scheck-In center. What do you mean by "add it as as feature to the supermarket"?
Greetings, lr
jodd (2022-11-14 21:02:48+00:00): I mean the following: I would add toilets=yes to the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6063592221
It's because I have seen a toilet for customers of the EDEKA supermarkt today.
jodd (2022-11-27 18:47:40+00:00): Hi, I just deleted the node for the toilet. Instead, I added the key toilets=yes to the supermarket (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129444830)
Dodko (2022-07-06 14:04:18+00:00): Značka footway=sidewalk sa používa na cestu že je tam chodník a nie na samostatne zakreslený chodník.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk

Chodníkom sa zvyčajne nedáva meno súbežnej ulice.
Dodko (2022-07-06 14:06:15+00:00): Zle som to napísal je to dobre, až na ten názov chodníka.
Myslel som na značku
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:sidewalk
wkdgs (2022-07-07 09:09:07+00:00): Hi,

ich finde man sollte einen Wasserhahn nur dann als Trinkwasser mappen, wenn man auch sicher weiß, dass es sich um Trinkwasser handelt. 

Dein Änderungskommentar hört sich so an, als würdest du nur vermuten, dass es sich um Trinkwasser handelt. Die Tatsache, dass du nach dem Verzehr nichts gemerkt hast, bedeutet nicht, dass es Trinkwasser ist. Frag doch mal bei der Stadt nach. Die können dir sagen, ob es sich um Trinkwasser handelt.

Unabhängig davon dürfte der Tag "amenity=drinking_water" hier falsch sein. Der Tag ist für explizit für diesen Zweck aufgestellte Trinkwasserstellen. Dieser Wasserhahn dient ja eher der Bewässerung des Friedhofs und nicht der Trinkwasserversorgung. Könntest du daher den Tag auf z.B. "man_made=water_tap" ändern?

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123239659
Hjart (2022-07-07 13:34:32+00:00): Undlad venligst at bruge navnefeltet til beskrivelser, som f.eks. "voldgrav"
Kristian Bangsø (2022-07-07 13:54:15+00:00): Tak Hjart. Det et mit første edit. Kan man så bare unlade at give det et navn?
Hjart (2022-07-11 15:10:41+00:00): Ja, det vil jeg anbefale
Marc_ch (2022-07-11 07:45:25+00:00): Hello Habi,
thanks for the improvement
the highway=service doesn't have surface=gravel all the way. I have splitted it https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123449457
Regards,
Marc
habi (2022-07-22 09:57:31+00:00): 👍
Jakuje (2022-07-06 09:10:24+00:00): Prosim, nepripojujte chodniky k administrativnim hranicim -- jsou to naprosto nezavisle informace, ktere nemaji mit spolecny bod. Tim, ze jste zmenil geometrii hranice, pravdepodobne jiz neni na spravnem miste. Tento pripad jsem opravil, ale zkuste na to prosim davat pozor v budoucnu:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123267875
adrianojbr (2022-07-06 21:53:22+00:00): Olá, filipekarkle. Seja bem-vindo!

No início da Rua XV, você marcou como restrito o acesso para veículos motorizados. Mas no comentário você colocou que há uma conversão proibida ali.

Você pode esclarecer o que pretendia mapear?

Faz um tempo que não passo nessa região, mas a última vez que passei era permitido virar da Alwin Scrader para a Rua XV.

Abraço!
filipekarkle (2022-07-07 15:10:37+00:00): Boa tarde,
Não é mais permitido nesse trecho carros e motos que estão na Rua Alwin Schrader virar a esquerda, somente é permitido para ônibus e caminhões.
adrianojbr (2022-07-08 23:57:27+00:00): Passei há pouco lá e realmente, há restrição de conversão, com exceção para caminhões (hgv e goods) e ônibus urbanos (bus).

Por isso, removi as restrições de acesso e adicionei a restrição de conversão: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14335647/

Uma observação: motor_vehicle=no impede a passagem de qualquer veículo motorizado (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle). Para impedir automóveis e motocicletas deve-se usar motorcar=no e motorcycle=no, respectivamente.

Abraço!
Harel M (2022-11-20 21:51:29+00:00): Hi, can you please fix the multipolygon 14325239? It seems that it does not create a closed polygon...
Dodko (2022-07-09 12:41:03+00:00): Keď je to pekáreň a novinový stánok tak sa robia 2 samostatné body
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4441596174/history
Filip009 (2022-07-15 14:08:13+00:00): Dobrý deň, o čo išlo pri úprave tejto čiary? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138619494/history
kartler175 (2022-07-07 11:12:10+00:00): Gibt es einen bestimmten Grund dafür, dass Du aus dem residental-Multipolygon den äusseren Umriss entfernt hast und die verstümmelte Relation übrig lässt?
https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/12990722
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.77700&lat=50.77767&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=role_should_be_outer%2Cways
❤️‍🔥 (2022-07-12 05:28:14+00:00): Hi, based on a quick search, this apartment building is called King's Square, while the plaza is called Station Square. Does this sound correct to you?

sources:
 - https://www.bayleys.co.nz/1655497
 - https://rwepsom.co.nz/properties/sold-residential/auckland-city/newmarket-1023/apartment/1878085
 - https://www.clearwaterconstruction.co.nz/project/kings-square-newmarket/
 - https://raywhite.co.nz/auckland/auckland-city/newmarket/SNH21312/
 - http://www.cnz.co.nz/ip-video-surveillance-mainmenu-16/case-studies-mainmenu-32/57-kings-square-apartment-building-newmarket
VLD302 (2022-07-14 19:03:15+00:00): Hello kylenz, thank you for reaching out to me about this feature. After looking over your links that you provided, I agree with your assessment of the naming of the feature and the area. Thank you for looking into this. I appreciate that you took the time to reach out, and please feel free to reach out again if you have any further questions or concerns.
wkdgs (2023-02-09 09:34:16+00:00): Da die Zufahrt ja existiert habe ich sie wieder hinzugefügt. Dieses Mal mit "access=private".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123243145
A67-A67 (2022-07-05 16:45:37+00:00): Ik heb hier ook het niet-bestaande pad naar de Wilgebant verwijderd. De Wilgebant is verboden voor fietsers.
ovruni (2022-07-05 21:44:56+00:00): Hola Maycol Anthony, en algunos de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado varios edificios sobre otros edificios, ademas de haber movido el poste como parte del cementerio, lo que genera un error, ya he corregido estas vías.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-06 02:54:30+00:00): what is highway=priority?
Dodko (2022-07-06 12:34:59+00:00): Keď ste presunuli knižnicu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4520170674 do inej budovy nesprávnu adresu z bodu treba zmazať.
Na dome kultúry je adresa tak si ju aplikácie prevezmú aj pre knižnicu.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-14 12:17:19+00:00): What is the source of this edit?
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 23:58:48+00:00): Cleaned up and fixed SEO and misformatted tags for POI in changeset 183759613

https://osm.org/changeset/183759613
eggie (2022-07-05 21:49:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback 
Wanneer een gebouw is opgeleverd kan de regel construction=house weg.
Meestal komt bij de BAGimport de adresnode mee. Kennelijk hier niet gebeurd.
De consytructionregel heb ik verwijderd.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Jorisj1 (2022-07-06 18:01:11+00:00): Dankjewel Eggie!
Johnbo (2023-04-19 09:11:59+00:00): Hi David.

I just reverted this edition because I could not find any bank at this spot in Ponta Delgada.

Also, when adding a new venue, try to add supporting data, such as name, opening hours, wheelchair access, payment methods accepted...

Best regards.
Dodko (2022-07-06 12:38:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/266794045
Keď napíšete názov budovy Dom kultúry nestane sa z neho automaticky Dom kultúry.
Je potrebné pridať značky
amenity=community_centre
community_centre=cultural_centre

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=community_centre
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre
emersonveenstra (2022-07-05 18:49:47+00:00): Hi,

Please don't delete and recreate things in OSM, it's unfair to the people who's work you're deleting.
emersonveenstra (2022-07-05 18:52:55+00:00): Oops, I misread your changeset, I guess you didn't fully delete it, but either way, McClaren lake shouldn't be a multipolygon, there's no need for it.
MxxCon (2022-07-06 04:10:27+00:00): Hello.
You deleted brand= tag, but you didn't change brand:wikidata or brand:wikipedia or official_name tags. This leaves this POI info in mixed state...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123244502
MxxCon (2022-07-06 04:10:46+00:00): You deleted brand= tag, but you didn't change brand:wikidata or brand:wikipedia or official_name tags. This leaves this POI with mixed info..
canfe (2022-07-09 08:36:18+00:00): Questa non mi sembra un'unica casa, si vedono almeno tre corpi separati.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123244853
Denisov21 (2022-07-10 18:22:32+00:00): Ciao,
ho sistemato il problema. Grazie
VictorIE (2026-07-20 09:42:06+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/714407782/

Would I be right in thinking that destination:backward=* and the other similar tags don't make sense on a  one-way link?

I suspect they are a hangover from when the two separate lanes of the slip road were one.
LateNightTone (2026-07-20 10:59:26+00:00): Yes, you'd be right - feel free to remove :-)
habi (2022-07-05 19:22:58+00:00): Wenn das hier eine 'normale' Strasse ist, ist `oneway=no` sowie auch `oneway:bicycle=no` unnötig, da ein `highway=residential` im Normalfall in beide Richtungen durchfahren werden kann und die beiden `no`s impliziert sind.

Also würde ich die beiden `no` auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22663924 entfernen und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28015644 so belassen wie du das korrigiert hast.
PeterBaumann (2022-07-05 19:57:11+00:00): OK, erledigt.
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-06 03:46:17+00:00): Reference:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway

"mapping of non-existent railways as incorrect"

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
DD1GJ (2022-07-05 22:12:58+00:00): Deine "schönen Singletrails" befinden sich im Naturschutzgebiet Estetal. Ich bezweifle, dass man diese legal betreten oder befahren darf. Kennst Du die genaue rechtliche Situation vor Ort?
McMoneysack (2022-07-05 22:19:49+00:00): Moin, aktuell ist der offizielle Weg auf diesen Singletrail umgeleitet. Es gibt auch nirgends ein Verbotsschild, dass dieser Weg nicht genutzt werden darf. Einen Eintrag zur exakten Beschreibung der rechtlichen Lage konnte ich aber auch nicht finden.
DD1GJ (2022-07-05 22:40:20+00:00): Direkte Verbotsschilder sind in einem NSG nicht erforderlich. Aber wenn es da eine Umleitung des Hauptweges gibt, mag das seine temporäre Richtigkeit haben.
https://www.nlwkn.niedersachsen.de/naturschutz/schutzgebiete/die_einzelnen_naturschutzgebiete/natur-und-landschaftsschutzgebiet-estetal-189375.html
Sheila Job (2022-07-05 18:37:39+00:00): Hi, I I just adjusted the building to be more square and validated
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123246104
messpert (2023-11-12 15:30:14+00:00): There is definitely no shoulder on the A436 near the Frogmill which is where I first noticed this mistake.
And I am confident that this is true right up Fox Hill to the old Air Ballon roundabout. What was your source? You said survey, but that can't be right in those areas.

I will remove the tag on the parts that I know and have repeatedly surveyed, not least with video.

Perhaps you need to check the other  parts that I have not surveyed.
emersonveenstra (2022-07-05 18:56:03+00:00): Hi,

For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076148244, if that is a swamp then please tag it as a swamp, not a pond. Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2022-07-05 18:58:00+00:00): Also please use better changeset comments, "some more random stuff" is not helpful for people trying to understand what you're changing
minimapper_osm (2022-07-05 20:34:46+00:00): Thanks for The Adveice!
Other Than That I Just joined Today!
Leo Slager (2022-07-06 22:22:30+00:00): Dag FM2441,
Dat roept wel veel vragen op.
oneway:bicycle=no op de Sylviusweg houdt halverwege ineens op. Is dat correct ?
Is er op dat deel ook een bushalte ?
Waarom highway=residential ?
Aansluitend op het eerste deel van de Zernikedreef lijkt highway=tertiary veel aannemelijker.
De routerelaties van lijn 9,38,90 heb ik omgelegd.
multimodaal (2022-07-17 11:37:48+00:00): Hoi, ook een vraagje van mij:
waarom is deze highway=construction verwijderd?

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/34996918

Deze ligt er nog bij als een weg in aanleg: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=147192874582179

(oude verbinding lijkt te worden hersteld nadat rijbaan en fietspad van plek zijn verwisseld):
FM2441 (2022-07-17 13:16:38+00:00): Hoi Multimodaal,

Bij mijn beleving was daar niets meer, maar ik moest zoveel informatie tot mij nemen, dat ik deze over het hoofd gezien heb. Zo aan jou foto's te zien lijkt er wel weer wat terug te komen.
Deze zou dan inderdaad hersteld kunnen worden naar construction.

M.v.g.
multimodaal (2022-07-17 13:47:41+00:00): Hoi, dank voor je reactie. Is erg herkenbaar, als je in een omgeving bent waar alles zo is gewijzigd en luchtfoto's geen uitsluitsel geven dan kan het knap lastig zijn.
Wat ik zelf vaak doe is zoveel mogelijk thuis in OSM al vast anpassen wat je al kan doen obv externe bronnen, nieuwe versie van data inladen in OSMand en dan aantekeningen maken op scherm icm foto's maken voor Mapillary. Maar het blijft soms een puzzel (-; 
Ik zal de wegen terugzetten met JOSM, dan blijft de geschiedenis behouden. 
Groet!
multimodaal (2022-07-17 13:51:23+00:00): PS ik heb een melding gedaan op verbeterdekaart.nl voor het ontbrekende nieuwe fietspad langs de Zernikedreef in BGT. Vorige keer werd dat snel opgepakt; als dat deel wordt bijgewerkt in BGT maakt dat het voor ons een stuk makkelijk om dit netjes bij te werken. Vorig verzoek in de buurt werd vrij snel opgepakt.
eggie (2022-07-05 21:52:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
emersonveenstra (2022-07-05 19:03:19+00:00): Hi,

Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076154593 is a residential road? it appears to be a road to a building, not houses
somix (2022-07-06 08:51:22+00:00): Hello, why https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12748293 is mapped as a multipolygon?
arcth (2022-07-06 11:39:38+00:00): Hello somix,

it's outline consists of at least two different types of fences not yet tagged in detail.
SekeRob (2022-10-08 21:47:07+00:00): Hi

Why did you change bicycle=yes to no when this way is part of a cycle route relation?
Đuro Jiří (2022-10-09 08:07:14+00:00): Protože tady je jenom chodník. Tady 45.53313, 12.64367 je značka, která ukazuje, že se s kolem má jet na druhou stranu cesty. Na některých místech jsou, uprostřed chodníku, stromy, takže to ani nemůže být biciklisticka stezka. Je pravda, že většina biciklistu tady jezdí po chodníku,ale většinou je chodci nepustí, takže biciklisti slezou s kola a jednou po cestě.
SekeRob (2022-10-09 08:29:20+00:00): We don't speak Czech in Italy, either Italian or English which is the common language on OSM most all comprehend, many actually preferring to post their CS comments in English which is what StreetComplete does, always.

Anyway, if you change tags on ways then you should have also correct the relations. NOW the 2 cycle routes on these ways are broken. At the very minimum the tags should be "bicycle=dismount", NOT no. There's also tags to tell the cyclist to  bicycle=use_sidepath, opposite side of road etc. "Varie in Lesolo" is not an explanation. Tell other mappers the why.

ciao
jodd (2022-11-07 17:50:30+00:00): Hallo,
ich hab eine kleine Frage zu dem Poller, den du hier eingetragen hast: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9868832716
Kann es sein, dass der Poller auf dem Feldweg steht, der von der Wiener Straße nach Süden abgeht? So wie der Poller eingetragen ist, würde er direkt auf der Wiener Straße stehen, was eher ungewöhnlich wirkt. War vielleicht ein Versehen?
VG jodd
SomeoneElse (2022-07-07 19:21:18+00:00): Hello,
Just to let you know that I've connected up a gap in NCN1 here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9579#map=18/56.19986/-3.41796 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123333039 .  The previous layout https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123247480 had a bit of a "convenience link" across the (old?) car park that didn't match the recent imagery.  Hopefully my link around the service roads is OK.
Best Regards,
Andy
andrum99 (2022-07-07 19:27:32+00:00): Apologies - I forgot to join that back up. Thanks for doing so.
Sandal man (2022-07-10 11:05:57+00:00): Hi you anly draw the line and forget them to give a tag.
Regards Jan
CurlingMan13 (2022-07-09 09:10:05+00:00): What /exactly/ did you "update".  I'm assuming you got rid of a golf course that is now housing?

If so, can you please try to provide a bit more detail than just "update".  even "Replaced golf course with houses" or "Golf course removed" would provide a ton more details.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2023-12-31 10:37:59+00:00): Apparently, not all of these playgrounds are actually public. Please actually survey before answering  StreetComplete questions

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145592619
Allison P (2022-08-11 08:12:52+00:00): Please check the case of addr:state. It should be all caps.
worlduser (2022-08-11 15:08:45+00:00): Hello,

I fixed the state to all caps.  Thank you for letting me know.
jodd (2022-11-07 17:43:36+00:00): Hallo,
danke, dass du Dinge zu Openstreetmap hinzufügen möchtest. Hier hast du eine Toilette eingetragen, direkt daneben gab es aber schon eine. Gibt es hier 2 Toiletten nebeneinander oder muss eine Toilette wieder gelöscht werden? 
Wäre super, wenn du dir das nochmal anschauen kannst. Wenn du Hilfe brauchst, gib gerne Bescheid. Du kannst direkt hier im unteren weißen Feld antworten.
VG jodd
wkdgs (2022-07-07 09:01:36+00:00): Ich glaube "building:levels=0" passt hier nicht. 0 Stockwerke hört sich für ein Gebäude etwas komisch an.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123248184
Fersche112 (2022-07-07 13:36:49+00:00): Ist eine große Fahrzeughalle mit einem Versorgungsbereich
user_5359 (2022-07-06 08:16:29+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1022938093. What ist the meaning of the tag boot = yes?