piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tilia_J (2021-08-15 21:43:52+00:00): Vuistregel is dat je op de algemene access-key altijd een beperking zet en nooit een openstelling.

Immers, zoals je zelf schrijft, wil je niet eindeloos aan de gang blijven met individuele access-keys toevoegen.

Zoals je nu tagget met access=permissive dan geef je hiermee impliciet aan dat je met een crossmotor of 40-tons vrachtwagen en alle andere mogelijke vervoersmiddelen het terrein op mag BEHALVE wanneer het een personenauto betreft.

Ik heb even op internet gekeken en op basis van mijn beeldvorming zou ik het als volgt taggen:

Het gaat hier om een zelfpluk-kwekerij met winkel, terras en wat woningen. De ingang is aan de noordkant, aan de WaterVALweg. Klanten met auto mogen het terrein oprijden, enkel direct naar links en dan slechts in één richting eerst naar het oosten waar een parkeerstrook op gras is, parallel aan de Waterweg. Ze mogen ook enkel via de Waterweg (dus niet de WaterVALweg) het terrein afrijden


Dan wordt de tagging voor alle paths en tracks: 

- access=private (alleen met individuele toesteming)
- agriculture=yes (eigen vervoer kweker)
- foot=customers (alleen plukken, geen algemene toegang wandelaars)


Voor de parkeerroute:

Tagging alle paden en tracks zoals hierboven PLUS:
- oneway=yes
- motorcar=customers
- foot=customers


Tot aan de winkel:

Tagging alle paden en tracks zoals hierboven PLUS:
-motor_vehicle=delivery (leveranciers)
-bicycle=customers (althans dat neem ik aan, en optioneel ook bromfies, motorfiets, etc)
Freek Bes (2021-08-19 16:42:22+00:00): Aangepast volgens jouw suggestie, zie wijzigingenset #109944168

Side note: de Waterweg in Putten ligt niet hier, maar verderop. Gelukkig kon ik er achter komen welke weg je bedoelde, aangezien de Watervalweg in het oosten op Google Maps duidelijk de verkeerde naam bleek te hebben (Waterweg). Ik neem aan dat je deze bedoelde.
Szymson (2022-06-01 15:52:00+00:00): To nie jest residential tylko ścieżka dla pieszych
habi (2021-07-30 12:30:43+00:00): Ciao d1sr4n
In this changeset you added several buildings with `building:leves`.
I corrected this typo to `building:levels` in changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108891336
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
d1sr4n (2021-08-04 11:44:56+00:00): Thank you, habi :)
d1sr4n (2021-08-04 11:45:11+00:00): Thank you, habi :)
eggie (2021-07-29 15:00:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:14:16+00:00): Added buildings
fnuttens (2021-07-29 16:19:55+00:00): Bonjour, il me semble que les poubelles que vous avez ajoutées aux nœuds 8960275478 et 8960275479 sont mal positionnées.
Bastenbas (2021-08-02 19:44:44+00:00): Merci ! L'ajout avec Vespucci sur le terrain est peu aisé.
eggie (2021-07-29 16:33:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. 
Feedback Kleine aanpassing verricht:  
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
gurglypipe (2021-07-29 21:34:25+00:00): Heya, was the change of the footpath (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111626010) to a golf path intentional? I don’t know Seascale that well, but from the satellite imagery it looks like it might be on the golf course at its southern end, but probably isn’t a golf cart when it’s going past bits of Sellafield.
gurglypipe (2021-08-04 14:41:21+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109151210. Please comment if that’s incorrect. Thanks.
GinaroZ (2021-08-05 14:26:22+00:00): Watch out, not all the major roads are paved - this one is cobbled (sett) ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5048694/history
aweech (2021-07-29 17:50:48+00:00): Hi,
I see that you have joined OpenStreetMap today and spent the morning going on a deletion spree, including deleting places I have been myself. You also claim to be representing "landowners" from all across the Park City and Brighton area, which seems dubious. In OpenStreetMap, we map things that exist, including things on private property. I'm going to be reviewing each of your changes this morning and reverting the deletions that map valid ways. You might be interested in the ownership=private tag to describe ways that are on private land.
Heinrich Deters (2021-07-29 18:13:10+00:00): I am happy to discuss these but as the landowner of the Bonanza Flat Conservation Area, (Trails and Open Space Manager for Park City Municipal Corporation, I believe we have the right to have certain information removed from the webpage as it has caused numerous safety issues and impacts. This application serves as the map for All Trails which is leading users into areas which have been closed or restricted for specific purposes. A great example is the the Girl Scout Camp on the map. GSU has had numerous safety concerns with this information provided. I am happy to provide the Executive Director of GSU to provide comment. 
I am also trying to update the trails for accuracy, names and regulations, that are throughout the property.
aweech (2021-07-29 19:09:37+00:00): The Girl Scout Camp is a great example of a business that should be on the map. They have a website where they advertise and rent out the place (before COVID). It was even properly tagged with access=private, meaning that only the GSU and their invited guests can visit.

The Bonanza Flat Conservation Area is under fee ownership of Park City, so the ownership=private tag wouldn't be correct here. The easement does allow Park City to regulate access to the public land, and any place that has been signposted as closed should be tagged with access=private or access=no depending on if city employees/contractors use those areas. However, it is a matter of accuracy and safety that any trail that someone can see on the ground belongs in OpenStreetMap with the proper tags. If people are using trails that have been closed, I recommend that the City put signs up on the ground saying those trails are closed.

Adding accuracy to names and regulations is much appreciated as oftentimes those get overlooked and have likely changed since the area became public land. There's a lot to do to improve the map in this area. Clumsy deletion of popular trails and access roads doesn't help.
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:14:08+00:00): Added buildings
EinKonstanzer (2021-07-30 11:28:35+00:00): :-D https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.1611278&lon=6.8706746&zoom=20&camera.theta=56.19&camera.phi=-152.98
Edelsalami (2021-07-30 16:04:09+00:00): Mittlerweile ist auch das endgültige Modell in F4 zu sehen.
gebux (2021-07-30 10:53:26+00:00): Siehe
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106555336
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106066823
und 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107104528
dvdhoven (2021-07-29 18:33:25+00:00): Reactie op een note op de Johanna van Bourgondiëlaam:
Ik heb 34-39 op de juiste plek volgens routedatabank gelegd. Die loopt via het Kangeroepad

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
BikePC (2021-07-29 18:39:31+00:00): Dank, ik verwachtte je reactie al nadat ik een knip had gemaakt... ;) en was van plan nog een keer te surveyen als de boel daar klaar is. 34-39 ligt in elk geval goed.
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:14:00+00:00): Added buildings
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-29 15:41:24+00:00): Sry, falscher Kommentar. Richtig wäre: Rechtsanwalt in Möhringen
VictorIE (2021-10-21 09:45:42+00:00): Hi, This might be a different company to the one that does soap, etc. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5858983112/history - somethings the automated suggestions are zealous.
MxxCon (2021-07-31 23:59:04+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete Flixbus relation?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108835028
Colin Luangrath (2021-08-02 15:53:58+00:00): Where is it located? I was only working on the school and might have just bypassed some errors around the area, my bad.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108835028
MxxCon (2021-08-03 01:56:25+00:00): If you look at your changes, you'll see Flixbus 2683: Ithaca => New York City (10792460, v31)
Colin Luangrath (2021-08-03 02:02:22+00:00): Yes that was a mistake. I accidentally set the errors to everywhere and cleared those because they were showing up in my area by accident. You can add them back.
MxxCon (2021-08-04 00:03:46+00:00): Yup, I added it back. Generally if one makes a mistake it's a common courtesy to other mappers to fix it.🙂
DUGA (2022-08-21 16:35:21+00:00): I've detached your work here from the road. Please avoid doing this because road is road, it is not the boundary of the school grounds.

The only accurate thing is parcel map, but this needs to be found from your county.

Also, you are welcome to use something from PEMA. Bing or Mapbox should not be used in rural places.
Quang Huy NGUYEN (2021-07-29 16:06:08+00:00): This point needed to be more clear
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108835266
Quang Huy NGUYEN (2021-07-29 16:02:35+00:00): Should enhance the topology of the buildings. There are 2 couple of buildings stuck corner
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108835268
zorglubu (2025-02-09 12:47:38+00:00): Bonjour,

Je viens de voir ce message qui date un peu ;-)
J'ai supprimé la boucherie. Si vous avez de nouveau un message de ce style, je vous propose de plutôt déposer une note dans OSM. Ou sinon, vous pouvez aussi aller directement sur le forum et demander n'importe quelle aide ou conseil, on vous répondra avec plaisir.
-> https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/

Merci encore pour vos contributions, continuez :-)
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-29 15:56:55+00:00): falche source angegeben: "Stuttgart latest aerial imagery"
Borbus (2022-06-01 17:24:16+00:00): Is the Old Bedford River at Earith really intermittent rather than tidal? As far as I know it doesn't completely dry up and I thought the river was known to be tidal as far as Earith?
Thingummy (2022-06-02 15:51:38+00:00): It's definitely not tidal (although the counter drain parallell a few miles down stream is). The issue is how you define intermittent.  The Erith Sluice Gates  are opened and closed automatically. http://www.ousewashes.info/sluices/earith-sluice.htm#sluice
This will flood the Ouse Washes, or,  maintain minimum levels in the main river(Old West>New Bedford), so there are periods when practically no water enters the Old Bedford . It's constructed with solid concrete base and sides, so not a major environmental issue if it dries out. Having said that, I haven't seen it totally dry for a few years so I am happy either way.  
The navigable New Bedford River becomes the Great Ouse and is tidal to a mile or so upstream of Earith at Brownshill Staunch.
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:13:53+00:00): Added buildings
Hans Thompson (2021-07-29 17:17:26+00:00): worlduser, you've made some nice improvements to this mall area. I hope you don't mind but I did a changeset in the area to add some details. I added parking, and modified some of the changes you've made notably, moving bussiness points to polygons where easy.  Would you look at the changes I've made and let me know what you think? I don't have any problem with your reverting anything tbh, I just had a minute and wanted to do some stuff. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108838592
worlduser (2021-07-29 19:31:04+00:00): Hi Hans,

Your edits look good.  Thank you for doing that.
fabiotofy (2021-07-31 00:21:14+00:00): solitamente l'elemento puntuale "indirizzo" lo si utilizza quando abbiamo anche il tag addr:housenumber conosciamo il numero civico per caso ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108835846
NeroCarbone (2021-08-02 11:06:01+00:00): Ho assegnato il 10 perché il titolare dell'azienda mi ha detto "10", ma come ho risposto nell'altro changeset il comune non ha ancora assegnato il civico.
Scout Jens (2022-08-31 14:07:29+00:00): Als Nebenstraße würde ich den von Dir beschriebenen Weg nicht eintragen. Besser als Fußweg mit bicycle = yes.
Viele Grüße!
SomeoneElse (2021-07-30 10:26:09+00:00): Hello Jobigutenburg,
Thanks for your update here, but it'd be really helpful to everyone else if you could provide more description than simply "Edit City".
As you can see from http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=248436981 this place gets _lots_ of edits so it'd be really helpful to know what you've changed and what the source of that change was.
If your mobile editor does not allow you to provide a more helpful changeset comment then you can always add something to the changeset discussion (like I'm doing now).  It's perfectly possible to do that on a mobile phone.
Best Regards,
Andy
SHARCRASH (2021-10-25 10:37:53+00:00): Hi! About the ways around here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586993234 I see on Geoportail's 2020 photos there have been works for making the whole street more adapted for pedestrians, haven't the little footways disappeared actually then?
clawfire (2021-10-25 17:52:15+00:00): It is. I could go and take some pictures and find how to edit this intersection. Should be only one road entrance and the whole area pedestrian (but with mixed traffic during the week only)
SHARCRASH (2021-10-25 18:59:05+00:00): No it's OK thanks, only if you have the occasion to check. I thought you'd know already because you added the surface. If you ever find out but think it's too complicated for you to update all the route relations, you can contact me to make the update. it's relatively easy with JOSM editor.

I think also it should be only one road entrance. User EUmapper kept both when he changed it as living_street. The type of road fits i'd say, since it's a road allowed to low speed traffic and priority to pedestrians. Sometimes he makes mistakes so the double road is certainly wrong according our point of view + photos. I warned him several times about some of his errors but he never replied. 
Thanks!
Filip009 (2022-06-12 08:44:51+00:00): Dobrý deň, prečo ste tu pridal na cestu farbu? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87529819
Jose Riha (2022-06-12 08:52:50+00:00): dobry, sekol som sa. mala to byt farba mostu.
Filip009 (2022-06-12 08:59:39+00:00): To aj také sa mapuje? :D :O
Jose Riha (2022-06-12 09:45:25+00:00): tak povedzme, ze nie zrovna masovo, ale ano.. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/bridge%3Acolour#overview

ja inak pridavam farbu napriklad aj ku smetnym kosom.
Filip009 (2022-06-12 09:51:21+00:00): Zaujímavé, len si neviem predstaviť, ako môže mať most farbu (predstavujem si cestný most), lebo ten je asi stále sivý. Ale keď si predstavím nejakú lávku pre peších, tak tam už si nejaký červený resp. modrý most viem predstaviť. Ale osobne mi to príde už až prílišné mikromapovanie :) Je to vôbec na niečo využiteľné? :D
Filip009 (2022-06-13 06:56:42+00:00): Zaujímavé, len si neviem predstaviť, ako môže mať most farbu (predstavujem si cestný most), lebo ten je asi stále sivý. Ale keď si predstavím nejakú lávku pre peších, tak tam už si nejaký červený resp. modrý most viem predstaviť. Ale osobne mi to príde už až prílišné mikromapovanie :) Je to vôbec na niečo využiteľné? :D
Filip009 (2022-06-13 06:57:14+00:00): Pardon, nechcel som dva-krát poslať to isté :|
Jose Riha (2022-06-13 07:01:46+00:00): Vyuzitelnost neviem posudit, mozno sa to niekomu bude hodit. Ved napriklad celkom bezne sa mapuju aj zariadenia detskeho ihriska alebo dokonca aj to, do akej temy su ladene: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground#Themes

Farby budov aktualne renderuje https://demo.f4map.com/ (napr. https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=48.1440610&lon=17.1263450&zoom=17).
Filip009 (2022-06-13 07:21:06+00:00): To je parádna mapa :O
Glassman (2021-07-29 21:23:20+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108839224
Ingolf2 (2021-07-29 17:43:40+00:00): Sorry, falscher Kommentar zum falschen Knoten.
baumann3141 (2021-08-01 22:04:04+00:00): Please undo your edits they are out of date. Please realize that aerial images are years old!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108839517
baumann3141 (2021-08-01 22:08:44+00:00): I am referring to your changes to Evergreen Ave/Albert. I just updated this a couple of weeks ago. This road layout was just changed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108839517
Ingolf2 (2021-07-29 17:45:54+00:00): Sorry, falscher Kommentar zum falschen Knoten.
trigpoint (2023-10-28 13:07:06+00:00): Hi
I am concerned that you have deleted the existing rights of way from this development. Why?
Cheers Phil
aachso (2021-07-29 17:57:41+00:00): Beim Bearbeiten habe ich ein überflüssiges Wegstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/610577377 entfernt, was von zahlreichen Bus-Routen genutzt wurde.

review_requested, da iD bekanntlich schon mal solche Routen ungewollt kaputt macht. Wäre nett, wenn da jemand drüber gucken könnte, der mit Bus-Routen mehr Erfahrung hat.
aixbrick (2021-07-30 06:21:01+00:00): Hallo,
die Busrouten sehen gut aus. Mir ist aber aufgefallen, dass bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13034361 das "to" fehlt. Bevor du das aber korrigierst: Du hast ausgehend von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478516448 zwei Abbiegebeschränkungen "no_u_turn" erstellt. Hier würde eine reichen: "only_straight_on" nach https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478516445. Das müsste dieselbe Bedeutung haben.
Gruß
aachso (2021-07-31 13:08:49+00:00): Stimmt, only_straight_on ist natürlich einfacher. Hab ich geändert. Danke für's Reviewen!
aixbrick (2021-07-31 14:04:45+00:00): Gerne :-)
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:13:45+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 11:13:37+00:00): Added buildings
arvdk (2021-08-21 22:39:00+00:00): Hoi Berco, wat is je definitie van 'building=terrace'? Volgens de wiki kan je daar in 1 keer "a linear row of residential dwellings" mee op de kaart zetten. Dus niet bedoeld voor 2-onder-1-kap en ook niet voor de losse huizen in een rijtje :) Ik pas het even aan in een BAG update. (Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=terrace )
berco85 (2021-08-22 09:00:08+00:00): Hi arvdk, dat was een foutje van mijn kant. bedankt voor de fix!
malcolmh (2021-08-03 16:58:11+00:00): Perhaps your could share those thoughts with the rest of us? In particular, why did you change the "source=US NGA Pub. 114. 2011-05-26." tag on the light to "source:seamark=..."? There are about 12000 other objects in the world with the tag that you changed. Should they also be changed, and if not, why is this object unique?
Lee Carré (2021-08-04 00:40:39+00:00): @malcolmh

Thankyou for your interest.

I presume that you refer to note:source .

I have been intending to post a diary entry detailing my analysis & conclusions on this matter, since it's received interest from several others. This will be on the next throughly rainy day, when I'm free from distractions.

In answer to your particular questions (sans context, until diary entry):
▪︎the simplest answer is: scope. I added other tags which had a different source, but wished to preserve the noted source for the seamark:* data.
▪︎I do not think that other elements should be mechanically changed. The only relevant way in which the element is unique is that it's the only seamark which I have (so far) surveyed.

Since you seem familiar with seamarks (based on your recent changeset history), do you know of a URL at which I might read “US NGA Pub. 114. 2011-05-26” (or a later edition)? Living on an island means that I'm surrounded by quite a few seamarks, and I wish to understand relevant context when surveying them. For example, I happened to pass by the reported position of another, today, yet was sceptical of the accuracy. I'm not overly familiar with seamarks (either within OSM or beyond), in the first place. In knowing more, I might feel confident setting source:seamark:*=survey and possibly correcting any disparate data.

Thankyou for your attention.
emvee (2022-01-03 22:17:55+00:00): Ik vraag me sterk af of dit de werkelijk is, de voetpaden en de fietspaden zijn niet te zien op een foto van 18-4-2021 en het lijkt me niet dat ze er zomaar 3 maanden later zijn.
boute002 (2022-01-03 23:11:17+00:00): Hoi Emvee, de hele Reigerlaan is in de periode mei/juli op de schop geweest. Ik woon er een paar honderd meter vandaan. Als je wil, kan je op de site van de gemeente Vlaardingen het bestek plan terug vinden.
emvee (2022-01-04 07:09:56+00:00): Dank voor je reactie, dan was mijn intuïtie fout.

Bij de gemeente kan ik niet veel (meer) vinden maar het Internet wel: https://www.vlaardingen24.nl/nl/nieuws/nieuws/werk-aan-reigerlaan-zit-er-bijna-op/31770

Ik heb gisteren nog de omgeving bijgewerkt, https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115731011, ik zal de changes op de Reigerlaan reverten.
lyctkel (2025-12-09 08:36:17+00:00): Hi boute002,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/625292785  wordt aangegeven met layer=-1. Dat is vreemd, want op de luchtfoto's is te zien dat alles op hetzelfde niveau ligt als de omliggende straten . Het is dus layer=0 en hoeft niet te worden aangegeven. Hoe zie jij dat?
Groete,
lyctkel
eggie (2021-07-29 19:52:17+00:00): Hi..
Your restaurant is now twice on the map..

I will delete your contribution.
Greetz
eggie
maraf24 (2021-07-30 07:59:27+00:00): Cześć.
Opisałeś ten zestaw jako "aktualizacja budynków", ale zmieniłeś tutaj także kategorię długiego odcinka drogi z tertiary na secondary.
Ze względu na niewłaściwy opis zmian oraz braku sensownego wytłumaczenia dla takiego podniesienia  kategorii, w zasadzie ślepej drogi, wycofałem cały zestaw zmian.
szydzio (2021-07-30 12:51:39+00:00): Hej! Reszta zmian podnoszących bez uzasadnienia kategorie dróg również wycofana w CS#108868464. Pozdr!
publicsebastian (2021-07-29 19:12:42+00:00): Edit: buildings have already been demolished.
aweech (2021-07-29 23:23:14+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed the edits that you made today, as you requested. You asked about the trails labeled "Davis Hill". That was the name that the original mapper who added these trails used, and that was 7 years ago, long before these new names were created by the landowner. So thank you for updating the names! You replaced some of the names of trails that strayed off the property with "unnamed", but leaving them blank would be better (I went ahead and fixed that). 

You also asked for a review on the changeset where you added the Spring House trail. We actually are allowed to use the Strava Heatmap to map things currently, so I improved the trail using that.

One last thing, on the Lewey's Loop trail, you added the extra " - Foot Traffic Only" bit to the name. That info was already saved by the bicycle=no tag that you added, so I removed it. 

Thanks again for your contributions, and let me know if you have any questions!
RJoyce (2021-07-29 23:56:47+00:00): Thanks so much for reviewing my work. I was frustrated by the fact that 'DAVIS HILL' was embedded into so many places that I could not change. Very glad and grateful that you were able to help so quickly.  -Rich
portalaventura (2021-08-03 22:35:38+00:00): Você destruiu a informação sobre o alinhamento da Rua Raphael Real e da Rua Pedro Alvares Cabral com a Rua Fernandes Vieira.

Você também alterou a delimitação do Moinho Santa Maria.

A imagem da Maxar não possibilita essas alterações que você realizou.

Por gentileza, reverta suas alterações desastrosas. Mover dados não permite que você faça considerações sobre delimitações de planta industrial muito mesmo sobre o aspecto geométrico de vias.

Quantas vezes já avisei você sobre isso? Porque você ainda continua fazendo essas coisas?
portalaventura (2021-08-03 22:37:23+00:00): Pra que alinhar os dados se eles já foram alinhados pela comunidade local?

Você não está ciente que o seu trabalho e de outros editores da Apple estão piorando os dados na cidade de Santa Maria/RS?