piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ajf3934221 (2019-01-28 09:42:35+00:00): Alles klar. Für die Kliniken Tal müssen wir uns wahrscheinlich auch noch etwas überlegen da hier das Klinikareal eine Teilmenge des Universätätsgeländes ist. Daher kann man dort das am Tag wohl nicht an den Kliniken-Tal Polygon hängen. Wäre es denkbar das klinikgelände als zweiten Polygon darüberzulegen?
ma-rt-in (2019-01-28 10:15:25+00:00): Schon mal garnicht ein 2. Polygon drüber legen. Aber da dktue hier der Ortskenner ist, soll er entscheiden.
dktue (2019-01-28 10:37:33+00:00): Ich vermute, dass das Polygon von Kliniken Tal [1] angepasst werden muss, sodass das Theologicum ausgenommen ist. Anschließend kann es meiner Meinung nach mit amenity=hospital getaggt werden -- oder gibt es weitere Elemente, die anschließend rein universitär und nicht krankenhausbezogen wären, die dann noch darin liegen würden?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622362546
ajf3934221 (2019-01-28 16:21:22+00:00): Hallöle, jetzetle habe ich mal eine Übersicht mit dem Gebiet erstellt das meiner Meinung im engeren Sinne zum Klinikum gehört: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/kliniken-tal_287389#17/48.52572/9.05152

Grob: nach norden Begrenzt durch das Polizei Areal und die medizinische Fakulät, nach Süden durch das Verfügungsgebäude der Psychosomatik. Bei der Calwerstraße Nr 8 bin ich mir noch nicht so sicher.
mavl (2019-01-21 05:44:24+00:00): Здравствуйте.
У вас "Рабочая улица" имеет длину 6 км и проходит между населёнными пунктами. Это ошибка?
gormo (2019-01-22 13:50:24+00:00): Hi, hast du den Weg entfernt, weil es ihn nicht mehr gibt, oder weil er nicht betreten werden darf? Im letzteren Fall kannst Du dir überlegen, ob du den Weg (falls er im Gelände sichtbar ist) wieder einträgst und mit access=no und note= mit der Sperrbegründung versiehst. Auf die Art und Weise trägt nicht gleich der nächste Mapper den Weg wieder ein... Viele Grüße!
Manuel H (2019-01-22 17:26:06+00:00): Da war kein Weg. Da hat wohl einer eine Abkürzung gesucht und diese eingetragen.  
Ich habe den "Weg" auch nur daran erkannt, dass in der dünnen Schneedecke MTB-Spuren gesehen habe. Danach landet man in den Nadelbäumen und ganz ab Ende muss man die Böschung zum breiten Waldweg auf allen Vieren runterrutschen. Auch die Radfahrer haben den Spuren nach die Räder runtergetragen. Immerhin sind das auch 15m Höhenunterschied auf knapp 60m.
von unten ist auch kein Weg zu erkennen. Auch der Bewuchs war nicht runtergetreten.
bielebog (2019-01-28 19:57:45+00:00): Hallo ilikeosm,

mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Darchive kannst Du das noch besser taggen.
Bernhard Hiller (2019-01-27 11:04:10+00:00): Way ...851 overlaps nearby ways - that should not happen. Did the validator of your editor not complain about that?
Please take more care.
viloan (2019-01-20 22:33:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2019-01-21 06:29:55+00:00): Hi,

This tree area cross itself
Way: 664924525

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.05144&lat=-37.95899&zoom=11
MichaelCollinson (2019-01-21 23:06:16+00:00): fixing it now.
Andrea Musuruane (2019-01-21 13:50:46+00:00): Ciao Michele. Non sono mica convinto che il limite di velocità sia di 30km/h per tutta Via Ospedale e non solo in corrispondenza dei dossi. Ciao, Andrea
mikki65 (2019-01-21 14:10:30+00:00): me li ha segnalati osmose ci sono i segnali  sia altezza 3 metri e limite 30  guarda con mapillary
Andrea Musuruane (2019-01-21 14:13:31+00:00): Ho guardato :-) E l'altezza è 3.5m. E il limite dei 30 mi sembra solo in corrispondenza dei dossi. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2019-01-21 13:48:14+00:00): Il maxheight è 3.5 e non 3 ed è solo nel tratto tra Piazza Biglia e Corso Nuova Italia. Correggo.
Max Tenerelli (2019-01-20 23:55:15+00:00): tutto ok, brava e benvenuta su OpenStreetMap
aequator (2019-01-21 12:08:12+00:00): Hallo Joachim, das alte Tagging als unclassified war bestimmt suboptimal. Aber eine Versuchsstrecke ist keine Rennstrecke, selbst dann nicht, wenn dort Sport- und Rennwagen getestet werden. Insofern ist dein Tagging sogar falsch. Deepl übersetzt Versuchsstrecke als "test track", auch Porsche verwendet den Begriff auf Englisch; deshalb lautet mein Vorschlag: highway=service; service=test_track
Jojo4u (2019-01-23 20:20:33+00:00): Für dein Argument:
Keine Wettbewerbe.

Mir ist gerade aufgefallen dass ICH die Einfahrstrecke in Sindelfingen auch als service getaggt habe...(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6060348#map=18/48.69298/8.99039)

Und die Diskussion auf der ML ist auch eher gegen raceway (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-October/030378.html)

Und service=test_track gibt es schon ein paar mal (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/service=test_track, http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Fu4)

Dafür:
Es hat benamte Kurven, Auslaufzonen, Sicherheitseinrichtungen und ist kein Zufahrtsweg.

Ich glaube du hast mich überzeugt :)
datamongers (2019-01-22 20:29:32+00:00): Is "Led Zepplin Road" really the official name? It's been a couple years since i've been on there, but i've never heard that name
Shawn Michael (2019-01-25 01:18:34+00:00): Yes.  According to the forest service Motor Vehicle Usage Maps at: https://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/custergallatin/maps-pubs/?cid=fseprd557674

You can download the GeoPDF for the Hebgen Lake Ranger District at: 
https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fseprd544202.pdf  Look for road 2527 in the "Roads open to all Wheeled Vehicles" section.
Glassman (2019-01-21 02:53:53+00:00): Question - is the name of the building Unknown or the name is just unknown. If its the later, it's best just to not add a name tag. Name tags should only contain official names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66488864
Jose Luis Infante (2019-02-24 23:54:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Squares_and_plazas

https://ca.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assemblea_de_Catalunya
Etimodato (2019-02-25 12:55:54+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Town_Square_Park_Anchorage,_July_2007.JPG
Glassman (2019-01-21 02:55:13+00:00): I couldn't tell, did you discover the square tool in the editor? If not, just select the building, right click then type an "s" to square it. If you didn't your buildings look great.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66488951
pertile (2019-02-12 11:33:01+00:00): Hola tuve que borrar tu edición, la información que agregás no se corresponde con un mapa de interés general. Si necesitás ayuda en el grupo de Telegram @osm_ar o en el foro https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=49 somos varios para orientarte.
Carto'Cité (2019-02-11 16:30:11+00:00): Salut José.
C'est vraiment un footway : https://www.osm.org/way/589670499 et https://www.osm.org/way/589670500 ?
Il font partie de la relation route ID 25 mais ne sont pas cyclable : highway=path ou bicycle=yes ?
Antoine.
josmougn (2019-02-11 21:49:58+00:00): salut Antoine, tu as vu le luxe de photos Mapillary sur ce chemin ? je dirais highway=path ou footway. Plus à l'ouest il y avait des travaux pour faire un genre de voie verte ce qui m'a influencé pour la relation ID25. Concernant l'ID 25 je suis toujours en limite de l'exercice en faisant ces relations départementales qui sont très peu jalonnées et pour lesquelles je dispose d'un document de ... 2003 et de données kml du CD91 pas très à jour. Je pense que je devrais enlever ces chemins de la relation et mettre la RD931 dans la relation "ID25 proposed".
José
GOwin (2019-01-21 07:02:59+00:00): Hello @Joebertsss. You, and your team,  have obviously ignored all our attempts to reach out through changeset comments, and direct messaging. Our primary concern, which we're willing to discuss and help you with, that of your team posting personal and private information on the Internet are disregarded.

One, you should know, assuming that you have prior and informed consent of these individuals, that OpenStreetMap does not allow the posting of such information on its platform.

Two, since you chose to ignore our attempts to communication, we regret to recommend to the Data Working Group (DWG) to continue to block, revert, and redact all your edits.

If you wish to pursue this project effort, without harming anybody, or violating community guidelines, you may always reach out through any of the following channels: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/PH/channels

---

In Filipino: 

Hello @Joebertsss. Ikaw, kasama ng iba pang mga nagma-mapa, ay piniling hindi pansinin ang lahat ng pagtatangka naming maabot kayo, sa pamamagitan ng mga komento sa mga chanset at mga direktang mga mensahe. Ang pangunahin naming layunin ay talakayin at tulungan kayong maiwasan ang paglalagay ninyo ng mga personal ant pribadong impormasyong ng mga tao sa Internet.

Una, dapat mong malaman, na kahit na meron pa kayong naintindihang pahintulot ng mga taong ito, ang OpenStreetMap ay hindi pinapayagan ang paglalagay ng mga impormasyong ito sa plataporma nila.

Ikalawa, dahil pinili ninyong balewalain ang lahat ng pagtatangka naming makipag-ugnayan, ikinalulungkot naming ipinapa-alam na ire-rekomenda namin sa Data Working Group (DWG) na patuloy na i-block, i-rollback, at permanenteng tanggalin ang mga apetakdo niyong mga in-edit.

Kung nais niyong ipagpatuloy ng maayos ang proyeto ninyo, na walang aberya, o nilalabag na alituntunin maari ninyo kaming makontak alinman sa mga paraang nakalista dito: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/PH/channels
GOwin (2019-01-21 07:03:06+00:00): Hello @Joebertsss. You, and your team,  have obviously ignored all our attempts to reach out through changeset comments, and direct messaging. Our primary concern, which we're willing to discuss and help you with, that of your team posting personal and private information on the Internet are disregarded.

One, you should know, assuming that you have prior and informed consent of these individuals, that OpenStreetMap does not allow the posting of such information on its platform.

Two, since you chose to ignore our attempts to communication, we regret to recommend to the DWG to continue to block, revert, and redact all your edits.

If you wish to pursue this project effort, without harming anybody, or violating community guidelines, you may always reach out through any of the following channels: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/PH/channels
viloan (2019-01-21 01:47:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
GOwin (2019-01-21 07:02:48+00:00): Hello @Joebertsss. You, and your team,  have obviously ignored all our attempts to reach out through changeset comments, and direct messaging. Our primary concern, which we're willing to discuss and help you with, that of your team posting personal and private information on the Internet are disregarded.

One, you should know, assuming that you have prior and informed consent of these individuals, that OpenStreetMap does not allow the posting of such information on its platform.

Two, since you chose to ignore our attempts to communication, we regret to recommend to the Data Working Group (DWG) to continue to block, revert, and redact all your edits.

If you wish to pursue this project effort, without harming anybody, or violating community guidelines, you may always reach out through any of the following channels: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/PH/channels

---

In Filipino: 

Hello @Joebertsss. Ikaw, kasama ng iba pang mga nagma-mapa, ay piniling hindi pansinin ang lahat ng pagtatangka naming maabot kayo, sa pamamagitan ng mga komento sa mga chanset at mga direktang mga mensahe. Ang pangunahin naming layunin ay talakayin at tulungan kayong maiwasan ang paglalagay ninyo ng mga personal ant pribadong impormasyong ng mga tao sa Internet.

Una, dapat mong malaman, na kahit na meron pa kayong naintindihang pahintulot ng mga taong ito, ang OpenStreetMap ay hindi pinapayagan ang paglalagay ng mga impormasyong ito sa plataporma nila.

Ikalawa, dahil pinili ninyong balewalain ang lahat ng pagtatangka naming makipag-ugnayan, ikinalulungkot naming ipinapa-alam na ire-rekomenda namin sa Data Working Group (DWG) na patuloy na i-block, i-rollback, at permanenteng tanggalin ang mga apetakdo niyong mga in-edit.

Kung nais niyong ipagpatuloy ng maayos ang proyeto ninyo, na walang aberya, o nilalabag na alituntunin maari ninyo kaming makontak alinman sa mga paraang nakalista dito: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/PH/channels
GOwin (2019-06-29 06:04:52+00:00): Hi there. Could you elaborate on what you're trying to achieve here? Adding a barrier along Abellana street doesn't seem to make sense, though I can see why you deleted a segment along Tipolo Ville.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66490488
GOwin (2019-06-29 06:05:35+00:00): P.S. 
By blocking Abellana street, your changing the routability of this road in the network.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66490488
brianboru (2021-03-08 12:33:44+00:00): Alvechurch FP 533(C) needs realigning - you have it going through a building.
stephankn (2020-07-11 10:09:48+00:00): please connect new roads to existing ones and not simply end the road nearby without connection
LogicalViolinist (2019-01-30 14:29:37+00:00): Hi is there an import plan/approval for said data on the wiki/mailing list?
Aleks-Berlin (2019-01-22 08:09:18+00:00): Hi naveenmtp, please write "wikipedia"="en:Name", as language has to be known.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Awikipedia
Thanks Alex
pitscheplatsch (2019-01-21 21:51:05+00:00): Hi kneufeld, welcome to OSM.

duplicate information? 
Your "newly" mapped way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540981723

ans existing way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284524800#map=15/1.3086/32.4055
manings (2019-01-21 07:31:23+00:00): The edits contains private information, I reverted via changeset/66495016.

Please stop adding names to houses.
chnav (2019-01-21 03:51:19+00:00): Спасибо за исправления и - очень важно - грамотное объяснение. Среди новичков такое встречается очень редко.
rivermont (2019-03-31 17:08:27+00:00): Hi Ryzen,
Why did you remove the Wikipedia tag? It is the page, though not containing much information, for this river and is valid.
rivermont (2019-04-27 18:56:44+00:00): I have re-added the Wikipedia tag (69647559). Let me know if you have any questions.
Carnildo (2019-01-21 08:43:58+00:00): When I drove through there a couple years ago, MT-200 left the interstate at exit 109, not exit 107.  Has that changed?
LucasLarson (2019-01-21 22:57:12+00:00): You’re right — thanks for your kind attention to it! That road is now “OLD MT 200”. See https://web.archive.org/web/20190101185215id_/mdt.mt.gov/other/WebData/external/Planning/maps/urban/fc_internet/MISSOULA_FC.PDF

I’ll repair it!
LucasLarson (2019-01-21 23:01:40+00:00): Done: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66520910
dval (2019-03-07 11:46:45+00:00): В этих правках по крайней мере 15 пар домов с одинаковыми адресами. Используйте редактор JOSM для поиска возможных ошибок.
pitscheplatsch (2019-01-21 21:55:22+00:00): Hi Ddoolittle86, welcome to OSM. 

Could you please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. Thanks.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66492939
Ddoolittle86 (2019-01-22 04:39:39+00:00): I am sorry new to osm. I thought it was encouraged to edit geometry if it was not updated. I used newer imagery and redrew. Yes a few times I did delete and redraw though, not changing much, so I will be more careful from now on when doing that. My apologies.
kooky_toky (2019-02-26 03:40:38+00:00): Hi Diogenes. Generally we only map internal turn lanes lanes like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664978830 if they are physically channelized or divided. Since there’s no physical divider within this intersection except for the small circular island, I would map this as a simpler, “hash” shape. It would look more neat in OSM Carto that way and the overall function of the intersection remains the same. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
manings (2019-01-21 07:28:57+00:00): The edits contains private information, I reverted via changeset/66494956.

Please stop adding names to houses.
DaveF (2019-01-21 22:47:48+00:00): Hi
How do you know this has a fence around it?
nina_litvinka (2019-01-22 05:54:52+00:00): Hi
It looks like a wire fence according to google maps
https://www.google.com/maps/@51.4090744,-2.2192504,179m/data=!3m1!1e3
DaveF (2019-01-22 11:18:23+00:00): Please do not use copyrighted data such as Google maps.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Please only map what you know & have evidence of.
As a newcomer it would probably best if you mapped within your local area, instead of world wide edits.
nina_litvinka (2019-01-22 13:15:23+00:00): OK, thanks
mavl (2019-02-25 17:26:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
us2ivb (2019-01-21 14:44:47+00:00): Здравствуйте. Можно поинтересоваться какую ошибку Вы нашли в этой линии? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61458918
Алексей Яценко (2019-01-22 09:37:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=service
us2ivb (2019-01-22 15:26:47+00:00): А ошибку то какую  отобразил валидатор?
Алексей Яценко (2019-01-22 17:33:30+00:00): Статус дороги исправил попутно с исправлением пересечения глубокой балки и дороги
us2ivb (2019-01-23 03:49:50+00:00): Ясно. Просто теперь вот этот валидатор http://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-ROS/routing-map будет выдавать ошибку (изолятор) улицы ЖД-2. Чтобы изолятора небыло, нужно подвести к улице ЖД-2 дорогу выше чем сервис (или сервис, но так же с тегом name).
Алексей Яценко (2019-01-23 11:44:05+00:00): Лучше "сервис, но так же с тегом name"
mavl (2019-02-25 17:26:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Sanniu (2019-01-22 13:18:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/62688778 is now one-way without exit... Can you fix it?
ar58 (2019-01-22 13:32:49+00:00): Oops...
I have seen it. I am fixing now. Thank you!
Sanniu (2019-01-23 14:28:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664989511 - is it roundabout? Please mark it as junction=roundabout if so
itineris (2019-01-23 07:36:42+00:00): Please do not add redundant information. Postcode of a building is determined from the postal polygons, and those may be changed by the decision of Hungarian Post.

Tagging buildings with the trivial addr:street is also pretty much useless (unless at street corners, or along with building numbers).

It's like you're in a contest for the highest number of changes, and not for doing really useful stuff.
Humus015 (2019-01-23 21:59:46+00:00): Dear Sir, few lines for asking the difference between address point and builings. Why in the tag is available the address, altitude, meters , floors, etc?
Looks like all these are questionable by anyone. If are available, means can be useful instead useless. Are point of view.
I would like to add also the floors nr. Why not ?  Important is that all the informations are real. I never create a road in the middle of the sea.
About tagging only the corners would not help me to find the info of any road.  Must be declare all road, like address point.
If the Post area change the place, what about all address point?
About the contest, I'm changing and declared  roads, buildings, hospitals, shops, phone numbers, zipcode, church and museum of any kind, overseas, where and when I'm visiting a place few or several times.
I respect your opinion, but all the info(fields) are available and writable.
flohoff (2019-01-21 11:18:24+00:00): Danke,
ich hatte es in falsch gerenderten tiles gesehen und wollte es korrigieren da war es schon heile.

Im moment ist da aber alles mögliche Kaputt. Die Theenhausener ist auch keine primary.

Aber ich habe Halle/Westf. jetzt eingestellt.

Das ist mir zu doof da ständig zu reparieren und changesets zu reverten.

Flo
Galbinus (2019-01-21 13:44:53+00:00): Im Nachhinein bin ich mir allerdings unsicher geworden, ob ggf. dieser für die Zeit bis zur Fertigstellung auf dem Streckenabschnitt nicht als Autobahn ausgeschildert ist, damit vorübergehend auch Fahrzeuge dort fahren können, die sonst nicht auf die Autobahn dürfen, weil ggf. die parallel laufende Theenhausener Straße im Zuge von Bauarbeiten gesperrt ist. Das ließe sich aber nur vor Ort überprüfen.
Galbinus (2019-01-21 14:06:00+00:00): Habe soeben dies im Netz gefunden: "Damit am Kreisel Alleestraße kein neues Nadelöhr entsteht, haben die Verantwortlichen von Straßen.NRW eine kreative Lösung entwickelt und umgesetzt: Der aus Richtung Bielefeld an Halle vorbeifahrende Verkehr wird nördlich der Grünbrücke Postweg direkt auf die Theenhausener Straße geführt. Wer von Norden kommt, fährt alternativlos vor der Brücke auf die Autobahn. Möglich macht das eine provisorische Verbindung, die bis zum finalen Lückenschluss ihren Dienst tun soll. Erst danach trennen sich wieder die Wege von A33 und L782, laufen dann ein kurzes Stück parallel zueinander. Wer von Osten kommt und nach Halle, Gütersloh oder Versmold will, muss jetzt die ostseitige Abfahrt 16 Halle (Westf.) nutzen. Verkehrteilnehmer, die aus Norden kommen und die gleichen Ziele haben, nutzen die neue südwestliche Abfahrt" https://www.a33-sofort.de/freigabe-2-von-3-a33-reicht-jetzt-bis-zum-haller-suedkreuz/3783 - Wie das vor Ort konkret aussieht, kann ich nicht einschätzen. Aber es stützt die Vermutung, dass selbst Trecker vorübergehend dieses Teilstück der A33 nutzen dürfen, es also rechtlich noch keine Autobahn ist. Aber Es klingt auch so, als ob das parallel laufende Stück der Theenhausener Str. nicht komplett gesperrt (wie im Moment eingezeichnet) sondern von Süden kommend genutzt wird.
Galbinus (2019-01-21 14:15:31+00:00): Dies hier müsste überprüft werden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635772238#map=17/52.04856/8.34055
Access=no + hazmat=designatet?