piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2019-02-06 16:08:39+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:11:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Xavier Tassin (2022-12-19 08:38:20+00:00): Big Ben height seems to be wrong (too high). Is this due to the scaffolding work from previous years that may have been forgotten?
keujfl839237 (2019-04-04 20:28:38+00:00): Salut ! L'accès à l'autoroute que tu as cartographié n'existe plus depuis un moment. A noter que l'imagerie aérienne est parfois dépassée.
chnav (2018-12-03 18:54:59+00:00): Здравствуйте, пожалуйста не давайте выдуманные названия природныс объектам, как то "сквер у дороги", "парк у дома" и т.д. У нас правила не такие как в Викимапии. Поступил запрос на удаление всех ваших правок т.к. они портят карту. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=728356#p728356
chnav (2018-12-03 18:55:25+00:00): Пожалуйста не тратьте своё и, особенно, наше время ))
mavl (2018-12-24 23:44:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
SomeoneElse (2019-07-07 17:44:18+00:00): Hello Արման,
Here you changed the admin_level of some ways that form the border between the de-facto Artsakh Republic and the rest of de-jure Azerbaijan.  I've changed this back to the previous value (4).  If you'd like to discuss why the various entities in this region are mapped as they are (and how OSM represents disputed areas such as this) please don't hesitate to get in touch.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2019-07-07 17:44:51+00:00): Բարեւ Արման,
Այստեղ դուք փոխեցիք որոշ ձեւերի admin_level, որոնք ձեւավորում են դե-ֆակտո Արցախի Հանրապետության եւ մնացած դե-ֆակտոր Ադրբեջանի միջեւ սահմանը: Ես սա փոխել եմ նախորդ արժեքին (4): Եթե ցանկանում եք քննարկել, թե ինչու են այս տարածաշրջանի տարբեր կազմակերպությունները քարտեզագրվում են, քանի որ դրանք են (եւ OSM- ն ինչպես է վեճերի ենթարկված ոլորտները, ինչպիսիք են), խնդրում ենք շփվել միմյանց հետ:
Լավագույն հարգանքներով,
Andy Townsend, OSM- ի տվյալների աշխատանքային խմբի անունից:
SomeoneElse (2019-05-27 10:21:57+00:00): Just checking - does https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70650851 (by the same user you reverted here) look sensible?
Best Regards,
Andy
Farras (2019-05-27 17:15:05+00:00): Hi, Andy. His edits are... very weird, borderline vandalism.

I still don't know whether he's a troll/bot or a good-faith contributor. He's banned from all Wikimedia projects. I discussed this issue with our local community in Indonesia last year: https://www.facebook.com/groups/osm.id/permalink/2046314488759217/
Farras (2019-05-27 17:34:39+00:00): Nevertheless, I think his contributions (mostly adding nonexistent things) need to be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.

Cheers,
Farras
SomeoneElse (2019-05-27 17:37:44+00:00): I agree, but I'm too far away here to really tell what is sensible and what is not.

It's be really helpful to me if the local community could comment on changes that look wrong.

Best Regards,
Andy
sorcrosc (2018-12-24 00:03:39+00:00): Ciao,
sto correggendo le relazioni di restrizione di svolta e ne incontro continuamente di danneggiate a causa delle tue modifiche. Anche con questo changeset ne hai modificate alcune lasciandole incomplete.
Restrizioni di svolta:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Itinerari di vario tipo (bicicletta, bus, strade provinciali):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route

Puoi vedere nell'elenco relazioni qui sotto quali hai modificato.

Per favore prova ad utilizzare Josm che è sicuramente più adeguato per fare modifiche complesse ed ha anche un sistema di validazione completo che di solito ti aiuta a non fare danni:
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/


Lorenzo
highflyer74 (2018-12-03 08:20:44+00:00): Moin!

Hier wurde second_hand=yes hinzugefügt, obwohl der Laden bereits als shop=second_hand erfasst war. Das macht wenig Sinn. Ich würde auch raten, bei den anderen von Dir bearbeiteten Shops genau darauf zu achten, ob es ein allgemeiner Second-Hand Laden ist, oder ob dort hauptsächlich Kleidung verkauft wird. Ist letzteres der Fall, sollte shop=clothes bestehen bleiben und ein second_hand=yes hinzugefügt werden. Das ist logischer und so finden Menschen, die ein Bekleidungsgeschäft suchen dieses auch.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich gern!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop=second%20hand?uselang=de
WoodWoseWulf (2019-01-28 22:55:36+00:00): Why did you change the whole area of Mezquitic de la Magdalena to a baseball pitch?
noemat (2019-01-29 00:17:40+00:00): 
El área ya estava está registrada como sport pitch antes. de que yo añadiera algo mas
WoodWoseWulf (2019-01-29 01:32:17+00:00): Es posible que tengas que ser un poco más cuidadoso. En los dos casos siguientes, parece que su nombre está vinculado a estos tonos:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/666759546/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489374140/history
eggie (2018-12-01 15:42:32+00:00): Hoi.. spelfout wellicht in de naam?
Groet,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-01 15:52:38+00:00): fixed type
eggie (2018-12-01 15:53:05+00:00): typo  .. maak er nu zelf een :)
binlaveloos666 (2018-12-01 17:42:09+00:00): Zal ik er name=koningsrijkzaal Jehova Getuigen van maken ipv getuige?
eggie (2018-12-01 18:43:16+00:00): Volgens mij heb ik dat ook aangepast. :)
eggie (2018-12-01 18:48:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2895384872
Tomas Straupis (2018-12-01 17:07:28+00:00): Autobuso stotelės pavadinime rašoma tai, kas parašyta ant stotelės ženklo. Ar tikrai ten parašyta ir dalis „autobusų stotelė“?
Ar oficialiuose tvarkaraščiuose šita stotelė vadinama „Skaistgirio autobusų stotelė“ ar visgi „Skaistgirys“?
dcapillae_buildings-import (2018-12-01 15:18:10+00:00): Sorry! My mistake: this changeset must have been uploaded by dcapillae_buildings-import user, my dedicated user account for this import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dcapillae_buildings-import
frosm (2018-12-01 15:31:54+00:00): n'hésitez pas à rajouter le voltage dans le tag voltage et la puissance dans le tag rating https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:power=substation
Tomas Straupis (2018-12-01 17:11:00+00:00): Angliškų lentelių ant gatvės pavadinimų vietoje nėra, tai rašyti tą patį lietuvišką pavadinimą tik vietoj „g.“ parašyti „street“ nėra prasmės.
abakus_uploader (2018-12-01 23:34:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
muralito (2018-12-01 17:10:42+00:00): Hola. 
¿Estas teniendo en cuenta que el enforcement es para mapear donde hay camaras para luz roja o velocidad y no va mapeado en los nodos, hay que hacer una relacion, con donde esta la camara, de donde a donde controla. etc. ?
Irwan IRM-ED (2018-12-21 04:11:31+00:00): hello farras,citra apakah yg digunakan dalam digitasi jalan tolnya?
thx
snigdhap (2019-03-13 13:24:04+00:00): Hello Farras,

Trust you are well, while working on Jakarta came across your the ways way 651543625
way 651543626 created by you but no imagery is matching with the data.
Could you please check with these edits.

Thanks in advance
Farras (2019-03-14 13:08:02+00:00): @Irwan IRM-ED Sentinel
@snigdhap

Hello, I used Sentinel-2 imagery per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sentinel-2
Nmxosm (2018-12-02 10:56:24+00:00): Hallo hsche,

da die Bar nicht mehr existiert, hat https://osm.org/node/2389924425 keine Funktion mehr. Du kannst also die ganze Node anstatt nur die Tags löschen.

VlG Nmxosm
hsche (2018-12-03 10:50:08+00:00): Habe ich jetzt hoffentlich richtig gemacht.
Nmxosm (2018-12-02 11:00:04+00:00): Hallo hsche,

existiert der Biergarten immernoch, obwohl du den Namen entfernt hast?

Sollte dem so sein, müsstest du das Tagging bitte wieder zu amenity=biergarten (ja, kleingeschrieben) ändern. Laut OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dbiergarten) lautet der Tag so und wenn sich alle Programme daran halten, können sie mit amenity=Biergarten nichts anfangen. 

Bitte melde dich, falls du noch Fragen hast.

VlG Nmxosm
hsche (2018-12-03 10:49:16+00:00): Der Biergarten existiert noch, obwohl er im Moment nicht bewirtschaftet ist.
Tag entsprechend deiner Anmerkung geändert.
Vielen Dank
Nmxosm (2018-12-02 11:01:46+00:00): Hallo hsche,

welchen Zweck hat https://osm.org/relation/9068089 ?

VlG Nmxosm
hsche (2018-12-03 11:09:56+00:00): Gar keinen und gelöscht. 
Habe das ganze Gelände jetzt als Brotfabrik zusammengefasst. So ist das besser als mit relations die einzelnen Bestandteile zusammen zu bringen, wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe. Hoffe das ist ok so.
VlG hsche
4004 (2018-12-02 23:18:34+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты.
name;en это для мест, у которых названия на английском (вроде Бургер Кинг). Может тут лучше Брусничка в название занести? а то что это парикмахерская уже исходит из тегов точки
4004 (2018-12-02 23:20:35+00:00): опять же, названия у мусорных баков нет
mueschel (2018-12-15 13:49:20+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way, it has no common tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651548269

Thanks, Jan
PierZen (2018-12-15 14:20:36+00:00): thanks, corrected
dcapillae_buildings-import (2018-12-01 16:47:20+00:00): Sorry! My mistake: this changeset must have been uploaded by dcapillae_buildings-import user, my dedicated user account for this import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dcapillae_buildings-import
Филиппок (2018-12-26 15:28:59+00:00): Это зимняя остановка , дальше только летом ездит так как нет цепей.
Twotert (2018-12-01 17:23:07+00:00): Bedankt!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-07 01:05:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65255079 where the changeset comment is: revert a few leftover nodes from fake city in Australia (most already gone)
lakedistrict (2018-12-01 21:55:01+00:00): Hi jimstn, thanks for this edit. I hope you don't mind but I've removed the layer tag from Stoddart House and tagged the road underneath it as a building passage (I should of done this when I mapped it earlier this year). I think that most of the building starts at ground level. If you ever spot a max height for the car park road then please add it. :)
jimstn (2018-12-01 22:47:32+00:00): Thanks, that sounds like a better way of mapping it
Djminisite (2018-12-02 03:36:55+00:00): They've actually been built now, (I've even been in them), converted them to buildings and given them details :) (although I'm not sure on which building is which out of the 2 new ones)
SomeoneElse (2018-12-01 18:16:19+00:00): Hello,

Please don't add things to OpenStreetMap that don't exiat (I'm guessing that a motorway NW of Lake Eyre is unlikely).

Depending on what you want to do, maybe opengeofiction.net is a better place for it?

Beat Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-07 01:05:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65255079 where the changeset comment is: revert a few leftover nodes from fake city in Australia (most already gone)
Sanniu (2018-12-12 13:10:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651553994 now unconnected parking aisle. Is the car parking exists here? From what street you can drive there?
mavl (2018-12-25 00:30:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:51:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:32:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-07 01:05:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65255079 where the changeset comment is: revert a few leftover nodes from fake city in Australia (most already gone)
mavl (2018-12-25 00:18:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-07 01:05:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65255079 where the changeset comment is: revert a few leftover nodes from fake city in Australia (most already gone)
OrionX (2018-12-23 23:44:59+00:00): Дома и теплицы исправил
BlackyP8 (2018-12-03 10:24:02+00:00): Hallo,

ja die Straße existiert noch. Aber es wird daran aktuell nicht gebaut, weswegen ich die Tags construction nicht richtig fand.
Nach meinem Kenntnisstand waren vor der Vollsperrung Bauarbeiten angedacht, aber noch nicht geplant. Also nach m.K. kann hier nicht von demnächst die Rede sein. Soweit ich weiß wird jetzt ersteinmal entschieden ob die Straße überhaupt wieder als Einbahnstraße geöffnet wird (nach noch nicht geplanten Baumaßnahmen) oder die Straße generell nur noch als Fuß-/Radweg genutzt wird.
Haben Sie andere Informationen?

LG
BlackyP8
seinfeld (2018-12-03 15:43:12+00:00): Nach den letzten Informationen von Stadt und Straßenbauamt vor einer Woche soll die Straße zunächst als Einbahnstraße wie zuletzt wieder geöffnet werden. Man sucht aber noch nach einer geeigneten Sicherungsmaßnahme, um Falschfahrten zu verhindern. Später soll die Straße Instand gesetzt werden mittels Hangsicherung und in Zukunft generell als Einbahnstraße genutzt werden (so war es mal geplant). Wir sollten uns noch ein wenig gedulden. Wenn demnächst was ganz anderes entschieden wird, kann man die Straße immer noch umwidmen. Grüße Seinfeld
BlackyP8 (2018-12-03 19:15:25+00:00): Alles klar, danke für die Information.

LG
SomeoneElse (2018-12-02 18:07:23+00:00): Hello,
Any reason why you've deleted the name from Dalby Carr farm and create a separate node for it?  It's not really any sort of "place" - just a farmyard.
Best Regards,
Andy
skgrange (2018-12-03 11:00:27+00:00): Hello. 
I have been doing a lot of naming lately and the place point is generally how I have been doing it. Fair enough for your case. I can revert the edit, or you can edit it for your preference? No problems. 
Stuart.
SomeoneElse (2018-12-03 12:25:34+00:00): Hi,
I wouldn't use a "place" where somewhere is just a farm name.  An example that probably is deserving of a place tag is Witherholme (currently just a farmyard at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641236564 ), as that is signed on the Whenby Road.  Maybe place=hamlet half-way between Witherholme farm (currently named "Witherholme") and Witherholme Hall (which in OSM is "Witherholme Farm" - I'd need to check the next time I'm there to see if there is any on the ground signage)?  Dalby Carr as a locality makes some sense - the OS has the label just northeast of Dalby Carr Farm, but I'd probably move it a bit further northeast towards the centre of the flat bit of land that is presumably Dalby Carr. 
An additional problem with "place=farm" is that quite a lot of places aren't really farms any more, even if the name still has "farm" in it.
Best Regards,
Andy
skgrange (2018-12-03 12:55:52+00:00): Hello Andy,
Sounds fair enough to me. It feels like a rather subtle issue. I would say that a farmyard is primarily a landuse classification (which may be named), but a farm is a named place, especially so in rural areas. The issue around farms which are no longer named can be handled with an isolated dwelling change and then the landuse could be changed to residential, but this would seem inappropriate in rural areas in most situations. 

I will leave things for a couple of weeks and have a look and see what the recommendations are from the community. Enjoy the week,
Stuart.
SomeoneElse (2020-01-11 13:24:15+00:00): Hi,
I just stumbled on the previous discussion of thise on talk-gb (while looking for something else, as tends to happen), so mentioning it here:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-September/019181.html
Best Regards,
Andy
udaykiran3 (2019-07-23 08:33:55+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the

"way 287594160
way 706594491
way 706594490"

classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'service'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance.
AkuAnakTimur (2019-08-09 07:19:42+00:00): Alright, fair justification. Please make appropriate changes for these highways.
Alecs01 (2018-12-01 19:13:02+00:00): Ciao, ci sono vari problemi con questo changeset, hai rotto la geometria di un'altra area protetta cancellando questo percorso: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254873333/history mentre il nuovo perimetro del Parco dei Mughetti ha dei tag errati su tutti i suoi nodi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651558959/history e non fa più parte della sua relazione che ha due inner: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5934754/history. La domanda è anche: questi confini da dove vengono? Sono dati utilizzabili per OpenStreetMap? E quanto precisi possono essere disegnati usando Potlatch?
paozaf (2018-12-03 07:52:27+00:00): Ciao, i nuovi confini vengono dall'Ufficio Operativo del Parco, per cui lavoro. E' lo stesso shapefile inviato a Regione Lombardia e caricato nel Geoportale.
Provvedo a correggere le tue segnalazioni.
Conosci un metodo veloce per cancellare il tag di tutti i nodi? Grazie
Alecs01 (2018-12-03 19:38:25+00:00): Ciao, grazie della risposta. Con JOSM (ho visto adesso che lo avevi già usato) ti basta selezionare il percorso, poi dal menu "Seleziona" scegli "seleziona i nodi del percorso" così puoi togliere tutti i tag in più in un colpo solo. Ti manca poi di completare la relazione aggiungendo i membri mancanti: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5934754 se non sei sicuro di come fare chiedi pure. Quest'altro parco esiste ancora invece? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3414339 finisce per essere inglobato nei nuovi confini del Parco dei Mughetti mentre prima ne era al di fuori se ho visto bene.
paozaf (2018-12-07 16:40:08+00:00): Ciao, ho già effettuato alcune correzioni come da te suggerito. Il Parco Fontanile di San Giacomo non esiste più in quanto è stato inglobato nel Parco dei Mughetti
Alecs01 (2018-12-08 13:55:58+00:00): Ok grazie, lo cancello allora
osmviborg (2018-12-02 08:39:41+00:00): Undlad venligst at flytte eller modificere adressepunktet. Adresser bliver automatisk opdateret. Hvis du mener adressepunktet er fejlplaceret, så giv Helsingør kommune besked.
mavl (2018-12-02 04:41:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. Что означает комментарий к пакету правок "Новоселезнево 55.66949/69.20154"?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-07 01:05:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65255079 where the changeset comment is: revert a few leftover nodes from fake city in Australia (most already gone)
4004 (2018-12-02 23:23:24+00:00): у вас опечатка в названии города
DaxServer (2020-06-18 19:34:52+00:00): Hi. 
This should be a good reading: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
Thanks!
Jordi MF (2018-12-01 21:02:53+00:00): Hola Adrián,

Enhorabuena por el trabajo que estás haciendo en Chirivella para mejorar el mapeado. Estás añadiendo información muy valiosa.

Una recomendación. Si añades una traducción al castellano de un elemento (calle, plaza, etc.), es recomendable añadir la traducción al valenciano (aunque coincida con la etiqueta principal del nombre 'name=*). Por ejemplo, en la calle Levante U.D.,  se añadirían las siguientes etiquetas: 'name=Carrer del Levante U.D.'; 'name:es=Calle Levante U.D.'; 'name:ca=Carrer del Levante U.D.'. La información es más completa y, en caso que un usuario tenga configurado una aplicación en catalán/valenciano, podrá ver el elemento en este idioma. Si no, probablemente, le aparecerá en castellano. 

Un saludo.
un usuario (2018-12-02 15:24:56+00:00): Hola Jordi,
Gracias por tu recomendación, a partir de ahora seguire traduciendo las calles según tu me has dicho. Voy a ver si consigo terminar ya con Chirivella, porque parece sencillo pero cuesta lo suyo recopilar información y poner todo en orden. 

Un saludo
Jordi MF (2018-12-02 15:36:38+00:00): Sí. Yo estoy con Valencia y, entre lo que cuesta y que siempre hay otras cosas que hacer, voy muy lento.

No hace falta que revises las que ya has hecho si te aburre "volver atrás". Añadiré las etiquetas 'name:ca' que faltaban.
un usuario (2018-12-02 16:23:03+00:00): Vale, perfecto. Yo ya he seguido tu recomendación en mi última edición y he añadido la etiqueta "name:ca" por alguna de las calles donde he estado añadiendo las direcciones. De todas formas si ves que se queda alguna que otra calle por añadir esta etiqueta puedes añadirlas tu.

Gracias de antemano
atcomapper (2018-12-01 20:14:36+00:00): Please do not touch the Danish address nodes.
ma-rt-in (2018-12-01 20:15:42+00:00): Why should not I touch the address?
osmviborg (2018-12-01 21:13:16+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Denmark
Hjart (2018-12-02 09:29:17+00:00): Also please do not convert cycleways to footways. The paths here are actually cycleways and should not be tagged as footways
ma-rt-in (2018-12-02 09:57:51+00:00): I can understand that with the addresses. But why should the paths be declared as a cycle path? Yesterday I was on site and Mapillary pictures from the beginning of November, there is no signs of the roads at all.
Hjart (2018-12-02 11:19:26+00:00): Yes, I see that they currently are not explicitly signed as cycleways. I used to ride them a lot though and to me they were always cycleways first and footways second. We tagged them as cycleways for a reason. Do not change without a very good reason. Please check with previous editors as much as possible too.