piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BS97n (2020-01-03 18:54:50+00:00): Und an der Universitätsstraße die Gehwegoberfläche ergänzt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79165636
alesarrett (2020-01-05 18:23:25+00:00): Ciao gremlin black. Ho visto che hai modificato elementi di questa via: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/702502112
In OSM è segnata come Jacopo Ruffini, mentre mi sembra, guardando su GMaps e su Mapillary, che il tratto ad ovest sia via Givine Europa e il pezzetto a est Via Cavour. Se abiti da quelle parti, riesci a confernare e modificare?
gremlin black (2020-01-05 18:42:48+00:00): Ho Modificato, grazie di avermelo fatto notare
Meersbrook (2020-05-15 11:21:54+00:00): Track type of T5 and T6: railway: tram attribute have been deleted. The T5 and 6 are a road vehicles with tires with a guide rail. This type of transport does not run on rails but on a roadway, concrete for the most part iirc.
It is important to correctly tag the modes of transport and not to generalise. A guided road vehicle must be tagged as guided busway, with or without a guide rail (the notion of guiding is important).
max gpain (2020-05-16 16:42:19+00:00): In fact it was more about the type of vehicle, being very close in appearence to any type of tram (see https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ligne_6_du_tramway_d%27%C3%8Ele-de-France#/media/Fichier:57,900_T6_V%C3%A9lizy_Translohr_n%C2%B0621_par_Cramos.JPG), and very much different from what is shown in the English reference https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway. So I understood it as a specific kind of busway standard buses for example could take. The last part near Viroflay even looks like a classic subway line. Yet I must admit I've just seen that the French reference page shows exactly the same type of transportation than the T6 (i.e. a tram on wheels guided by a single rail): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway.
+ the way it is rendered in classic OSM style makes it appear very different from the rest of the tramway lines, which is a little counter-intuitive to me...
max gpain (2020-05-16 16:44:01+00:00): (because T6 is considered as a tramway line and not as a bus line, as the "T" shows)
Meersbrook (2020-05-16 17:01:20+00:00): Hi Michel, I appreciate you taking time to answer. Allow me to give more detail. Several things need to be considered for the tagging.
First, the is no doubt that T5 and T6 are not trams. Trams can basically be considered trains.
Second comes the challenge of tagging these vehicles & lines. The lines don't have tracks but are roads, à 'chaussée', perhaps a piste. TVR or Transport en Voie Réservée has never been tagged as a tram. A road reserved for road transport will be tagged as highway. The guide rail not withstanding makes no difference to the vehicles which are electric buses. So we have the bighway=guidedbusway.
These indeed are shown as blue lines on the map but that's how they are rendered.. We don't choose that. As a reserved roadway the tag is correct regardless of the colour of the road on the map. We do not tag for the look of the map.
Third is how to tag the lines, the 'relation'. These vehicles are road vehicles so we have a bus. If they were autonomous they would just be buses but as they take current from overhead wires the line relation type should be tagged as a trolleybus.
The only reason some may not like this tagging is the ne given to them by the operator. RATP doesn't use the trolleybus naming but this does not matter to us, we map technically correct regardless of how RATP calls them.
We, unlike RATP, can use all the tools, nomenclature etc, to correctly tag what things are. We, you, me, are better than them :) 
I hope this explains everything.
Regards
drifter (2020-02-15 20:59:41+00:00): Cześć, mam pytanie, dlaczego zmieniasz typy dróg z track na unclassified dla dróg gruntowych?
gogorm (2023-04-04 21:21:48+00:00): Hi, if the English name is a correct translation it should be retained in name:en tag rather than deleted altogether.
Teachmor (2023-04-04 22:32:07+00:00): I cannot remember what English name was shown but this is an Irish speaking area and this is the correct name in Irish. I would surmise that the English namewas not a translation but a phonetic representation, See Séamus Heaney's play "Translations"
skfd (2020-01-05 01:57:33+00:00): Привет! В имя лучше не писать то что и по типу объекта понятно. Например название пожарной станции можно с таблички списать и всё такое :D
xmd5a (2020-01-14 19:51:13+00:00): Добрый день. Указание имени "Детская площадка" у детской площадки избыточно. Это и так задаётся тегом leisure=playground. В OSM в тег name пишутся имена собственные, а не типы объектов.
maraf24 (2020-01-11 15:25:47+00:00): Wszystkie ronda już były prawidłowo zmapowane.
MKnight (2020-01-04 12:24:47+00:00): Moin,
Du hast ein review angefordert, hier ist es.

Die Zusammenführung der residential sieht sehr gut aus.
Ich hätte in dem Zuge noch die diversen Verklebungen an der Hermsdorfer Straße mit entsorgt.
aseerel4c26 (2020-01-03 20:56:42+00:00): Notiz: siehe dazu auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1594406
peregrination (2020-01-03 19:22:27+00:00): LGTM
mueschel (2020-01-04 12:18:35+00:00): Hi,
this building got a strange tag, 119=120 - could you check that?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760599790

Thanks!
Singi (2020-01-31 16:01:51+00:00): Hi PrasadRajuV,

I see that you have changed the ways to secondary_links?????
camelCaseNick (2020-01-04 03:22:59+00:00): Hey,
I don't speak Czech so I had to use a translator to read the linked page. But it seems that that page does not recommend removing wikidata links and replacing them with wikipedia tags, but only to add the latter. Is that correct? And if so, why did you remove this valuable reference? Or was it a mistake?
CamelCaseNick
camelCaseNick (2020-01-04 03:41:45+00:00): The list of changesets in which you have made this kind of changes seems to be:

79114293
79114716
79114792
79114896
79114946
79115031
79115079
79115150
79115241
79115280
79170232
79170292
79170331
79170359
79170401
79170435
79170473
79170494
79170520
79170539
79170651
79170761
79170847
79170875
79170986
79171019
79171048
79171088
batat (2020-01-05 07:57:52+00:00): That seems to be not intentional change. I will in next 3 days review all other changes I made. Reverting....
camelCaseNick (2020-01-05 17:53:57+00:00): Ah.. It seems that iD might sometimes remove wikidata tags, when wikipedia tags are modified, but at least in some cases – I haven't checked all changes in detail – the wikidata and wikipedia references even match. So I don't see, why iD should do that, but it is that way, so we have to deal with it.
Thank You for your (future) efforts on that!
Enock4seth (2022-04-29 15:11:06+00:00): Hi, 
[1] and [2] contradicts, want to help fix? Seems [2] is not Soe.

1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2028051634
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7106570803
mfbehrens (2022-05-02 07:11:43+00:00): Thank you. Of course you are right. I changed the name of [2] to Kumbosugu.
opendcc (2020-01-03 23:26:16+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf Openstreetmap und vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge. Darf ich Dich aber darauf hinweisen, dass bei name wirklich nur der allgemein übliche Name des Objektes beschreiben wird (also z.B. Isar beim Fluß), nicht aber dessen Funktion oder gar die Einwohner. Ich habe mir erlaubt, das tagging entsprechend zu korrigieren.

Viele Grüße
oba510 (2020-01-05 12:52:45+00:00): Unfortunately there were some problems here.  For example, most of the tags were deleted from Caffe Strada (including amenity=cafe...), the temporary bus platform at Shattuck & University was deleted, some completely unrelated/wrong brand/cuisine tags were added to Cafe Rio, the Golden Bear Cafe lost some of its info, the entrance to the Berkeley Art Museum was deleted, and the building passage tag was removed from the part of Sather Lane that passes through the building. I've fixed these.

It looks like you're using the id editor's validator.  Please be careful - it can be useful, but it only reports *potential* issues, and isn't necessarily 100% correct.
jaffatalism (2020-01-05 17:58:01+00:00): Thank you, I will try to be cognizant of iD's error checker in the future.
Mazda05 (2020-01-04 19:25:27+00:00): thx
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79171074
literan (2020-01-04 11:38:15+00:00): аптека с названием "Бургер кинг"??? если что, бургер кинг уже обозначен в 50 метрах от этой точки
Marwis00 (2020-02-19 07:55:51+00:00): Po co ten bałagan z liniami SN przy elektrowni Rutki? Połączenia są błędnie wrysowane, nie odzwierciedlają prawdziwego układu.
Marek-M (2020-02-19 09:17:17+00:00): Starałem się odzwierciedlić prawdziwy układ posiłkując się WMS z geoportalu z uzbrojeniem terenu. Przy tej gmatwaninie kabli mogłem coś namieszać.
M!dgard (2020-01-07 15:13:25+00:00): Het oostelijke deel is op luchtbeelden nog steeds gepixelleerd wat wijst op militair domein. Je kan ook zien dat het nog dezelfde gebouwen zijn als vroeger. Daarom heb ik dat deel terug militair gemaakt.
Pikse (2020-05-19 09:41:54+00:00): Tee, mis läänes Metsakalmistut piirab, ei ole Kloostrimetsa tee. Vt https://geoportaal.maaamet.ee/est/Kaardirakendused/Aadressiandmete-kaardirakendus-p125.html.
dgitto (2020-01-03 23:18:25+00:00): benvenuto in osm
davideluca (2020-01-04 19:12:28+00:00): grazie, ho voluto solo fare un test di tracciamento del perimetro di un isolato del centro storico. Avendone eseguito il rilevo ho provato a riportarlo sulla mappa.
ivanbranco (2022-01-23 00:55:13+00:00): HI Grzes979,

the Wiki says that route=hiking relations represent "foot and hiking routes that are named or numbered or otherwise signed" but you added (especially in Georgia) hiking relations that do not have a name, a ref number or a symbol. What's the source of this hiking routes?

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1fjU
djsa (2025-10-27 10:26:05+00:00): Hey JanFi,

Een beetje een late vraag bij deze changeset, maar wat is je bron van alle naamsveranderingen van "Ij" naar "IJ"? Voor zover ik kan zien wordt er in alle officiele documentie van deze straatnamen "Ij" vermeld.
JanFi (2025-10-27 12:04:42+00:00): Dag,
Dat is gewoon een spellingsregel in het Nederlands. IJ is één letter, behalve in een paar leenwoorden zoals bijectie. IJzer dus, aan het begin van een zin.
djsa (2025-10-27 15:22:12+00:00): Akkoord, maar ik had het eerder over zowel de straatnaamborden als geopunt die bvb Ijzerenweg weergeven. Ik ben voorstander van het volgen van correcte spellingsregels, vroeg me gewoon af hoe er om gegaan werd met conflicterende informatie.
JanFi (2025-10-27 20:15:40+00:00): Tja, die officiële aanduidingen zijn dikwijls twijfelachtig. In West-Vlaanderen heb je de rivier de IJzer (en niet de Ijzer zoals Google Maps ze noemt, en daar vind je dan dit staaltje:
https://www.google.com/maps/@51.0333831,2.85433,3a,75y,142.98h,88.32t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sELcNdn_y7Wnyd4K6c47xmA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D1.6814440058017226%26panoid%3DELcNdn_y7Wnyd4K6c47xmA%26yaw%3D142.98325284387104!7i16384!8i8192!5m1!1e4?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTAyMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D . Drie officiële borden, twee juist en één verkeerd (ik heb ongeveer twee minuten moeten zoeken naar dit voorbeeld). Straatnaamborden? Vergelijk https://www.google.com/maps/@51.0336163,2.8543876,3a,15y,304.67h,77.58t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sJPEtkqC349PzLZouMfv_-g!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D12.421479901686183%26panoid%3DJPEtkqC349PzLZouMfv_-g%26yaw%3D304.6727899539023!7i16384!8i8192!5m1!1e4?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTAyMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D met https://www.google.com/maps/@51.0762535,2.8363424,3a,15y,82.99h,82.66t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sPkvdGGuNoThdCYJpei_-lg!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fcb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26pitch%3D7.340249887208103%26panoid%3DPkvdGGuNoThdCYJpei_-lg%26yaw%3D82.98636890740673!7i16384!8i8192!5m1!1e4?entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI1MTAyMi4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D.
djsa (2025-11-04 14:15:28+00:00): Goed punt. Ben zeker akkoord met rechtlijnig officiële spelling te volgen. (Heb vorige aanpassingen van mezelf gerevert voor de zekerheid.)

Merci voor de tijd om voorbeelden bij elkaar te zoeken!
BCNorwich (2020-01-04 07:29:59+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Yes you are correct, this line is in use for passenger traffic! This section however is a siding off of the main line to facilitate the platform. The siding then rejoins the main line. 

I've therefore reinstated the service=siding tag.

Regards Bernard.
PT-53 (2020-01-04 09:46:23+00:00): Hallo  petrich-andi,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz einige Place-Angaben abgeändert. Z.B. hast Du hier am Knoten für das Künstlerviertel
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3069071659/history
das Merkmal
place=neighbourhood
abgeändert in
place=suburb.
Subub steht gem. Wiki für einen offizielen Stadtteil mit eigener Verwaltung.
Wiki - Place:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:place?uselang=de
Wiki - Suburb:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dsuburb
In Wikipedia werden für Memmingen
folgende Stadtteile aufgeführt:
Amendingen, Buxach/Hart, Dickenreishausen, Eisenburg, Steinheim, Volkratshofen und Ferthofen.
Das Künstlerviertel ist hier nicht aufgeführt.
Wikipedia:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memmingen#Stadtgliederung
Ich halte die bisherige Einstufung des Künstlerviertels mit
place=neighbourhood
als Stadtviertel für passender.

Kannst Du Deine Änderungen bitte näher begründen?

Grüße
PT-53 (2020-01-13 11:16:32+00:00): Hallo Andi,
ich warte noch auf Deine Begründung zu den monierten Änderungen.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-01-26 08:33:35+00:00): Hallo Andi,
wenn Du Deine Änderungen nicht begründen kannst, werde ich in den nächsten Tagen diese wieder zurücksetzen.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-02-16 11:54:43+00:00): Keine Reaktion, Schade!
Änderungen zurückgesetzt
woodpeck (2020-06-21 10:08:26+00:00): Nachricht an petrich-andy mit Bitte um Kommentar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3769
petrich-andi (2020-08-29 07:56:20+00:00): Vielen Dank für die Information, ich befand mich im Krankenstand
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-01-03 22:23:11+00:00): Wielkie dzięki za poprawienie!
mueschel (2020-01-04 10:18:57+00:00): Please make sure you don't upload your internal QA markers('dupe') to the OSM database!
Palolo (2020-01-05 00:01:12+00:00): @mueschel Thank you for the note, I did not create that tag, I believe it must have persisted with the Mapwithai plugin. Thank you for all you do to improve OSM.
philippec (2020-01-24 22:14:16+00:00): indoor ?
s8evq (2020-01-24 22:34:13+00:00): Nee, buiten aan de muur. Ik heb wellicht nog een foto. Waar is je voorkeur voor upload? Waar zet ik die?
philippec (2020-01-24 22:35:30+00:00): mapillary, of stuur de foto naar mij
s8evq (2020-01-25 08:02:26+00:00): Ik heb een email gestuurd.
geow (2020-02-07 22:16:21+00:00): Hi Schittkalk, just a minor detail, we do not use the name tag to describe things. Maybe you could add the real name. 

Thanks
geow
geow (2020-02-07 22:19:35+00:00): I meant this node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2077213215

like here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2971891917
geow (2020-03-08 19:01:20+00:00): fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2077213215
milet (2020-01-04 11:07:28+00:00): Hallo,

du hast mit deiner Änderung dieses  ganze Gebiet als eingezäunt markiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201395624
Ist da tatsächlich eine so große Fläche mit einem Zaun umgeben oder war das ein Versehen?

(Ein kleiner Tipp zum Hauser eintragen: Wenn man den Gebäudeumriß markiert und die Taste "Q" drückt, werden die Seiten rechtwinklich ausgerichtet.)
norbert_w (2020-01-04 12:44:24+00:00): Hallo,

Danke für den Hinweis, eigentlich wollte ich den Zaun um die Tongrube markieren, muss dabei aber diese Linie erwischt haben die ja wohl die landwirtschaftliche Fläche zwischen Bahn, Strasse, Herolsberg und Kalchreuth umfasst, wobei mir der Sinn dieser Linie unklar ist, die Ackerflächen sind ja markiert wobei das im Bereich der Tongrube nicht ganz stimmen kann. Ich habe den "Zaun" in "Linie" umbenannt. Danke nochmals, auch für den Tip zur Rechtwikeligkeit
Glassman (2020-01-04 03:14:20+00:00): I'm not sure if this will help. You made need to instruct Amazon where to deliver the packages to. I would suggest adding an entrance to your house and merge the address with the entrance. Then connect the entrance with a footway to the sidewalk I added in front of the street.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79174698
PT-53 (2020-01-04 09:03:15+00:00): Hallo petrich-andi,
Du hast an diesem Kreisel
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14328222/history
das Merkmal
lanes=2
ergänzt. Warum?
Ich kann dort keine 2 Fahrspuren erkennen.
Was ist der Grund für Deine Ref-Änderungen?
Wie sind die Straßen vor Ort beschildert?

Bitte um Rückmeldung als neuen Kommentar in diesem Änderungssatz.

Grüße
petrich-andi (2020-01-04 13:19:24+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung!! :)
Vor Ort ist die komplette Straße durch das Stadtgebiet als B300 ausgeschildert, der Kreisverkehr wurde im Rahmen von Straßenbaumaßnahmen letztes Jahr zweispurig gestaltet. Ich werde dir in Kürze ein paar Fotos, die dies aufzeigen, zukommen lassen. Weiß es aber auch nur weil ich in Memmingen wohne und dort jeden Tag durchfahre. Schreib mich am besten mal persönlich an. :)
 
Viele Grüße 
Andreas Petrichsen
ortho_is_hot (2020-01-04 11:36:23+00:00): G'day lu_an,

I've found 66 changesets where you've used "Seen on Google" as the source for your information. As part of the contributor terms that you agreed to when signing up to OpenStreetMap, you can only use non-copyright sources for information unless given special permission. We have not been given permission from Google to use their data, and I am of the opinion that all 66 changesets should be reverted due to copyright infringement, unless the source you have put is incorrect?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot

(Translated with Google Translate)

Olá lu_an,

Encontrei 66 conjuntos de alterações em que você colocou "Visto no Google" como fonte de suas informações. Como parte dos termos do colaborador com os quais você concordou ao se inscrever no OpenStreetMap, você só pode usar fontes que não sejam de direitos autorais para obter informações, a menos que seja dada permissão especial. Não recebemos permissão do Google para usar seus dados e acho que todos os 66 conjuntos de alterações devem ser revertidos devido à violação de direitos autorais, a menos que a fonte que você colocou esteja incorreta?

Obrigado,
ortho_is_hot
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-05 16:44:58+00:00): Hallo darkestdark, warum hast du hier das turn:lanes und das change:lanes gelöscht? Das sind durchaus nicht unwichtige Daten. 

Du bist noch einigermaßen neu und kannst natürlich noch nicht alles über OSM wissen. Ich würde dir aber sehr raten, auf solche Rückfragen wie diese hier (oder meine PN gestern) irgendwie zu reagieren, sonst müssen wir eine Notbremse reinhauen.
kreuzschnabel (2020-01-04 10:21:32+00:00): Hi darkestdark, steht da wirklich so was wie „Privatweg, Durchgang verboten“ dran oder doch so was wie „Privatweg, Benutzung auf eigene Gefahr“? Wenn letzteres, dann ist access=permissive richtig.
Rico557 (2020-01-10 11:03:44+00:00): в местных СМИ написали об открытии 30.12.2019. Хотя по факту на начало января оно ещё на Спецстроймонтаж ОАО "ГПС"
4004 (2020-01-10 12:04:29+00:00): открытие было кажется чуть раньше, церемония может к 30. видел, что люди заселились.
вы к тому, что там еще construction или оператор не тот?
Rico557 (2020-01-14 11:35:26+00:00): Вопрос в том что считать датой ввода в эксплуатацию. У Вас - 25, в СМИ - 30, а знакомые энергетики сказали, что этот объект ещё не в договоре Мед.университета(возможно ещё в процессе передачи).
4004 (2020-01-14 12:04:39+00:00): не претендую на последнюю инстанцию, но в моем понимании start_date - это дата, с которой обьект начинает использоваться в соответствии с тегами (в данном случае dormitory), т.е. когда заселяют студентов. ввод в эксплуатацию термин больше строительный и расплывчатый.

но вообще без разницы, если исправите на другую дату обещаю не откатывать
Rico557 (2020-01-15 07:53:16+00:00): так никто ничего и не хотел исправлять. всё что можно, мной внесено.
Общее дело ведь делаем)))

Первый пост всего лишь моё удивление
4004 (2020-01-15 10:17:28+00:00): ну, если ваша точка зрения аргументирована чем то, чего я не знаю, то исправлять можно и нужно
Matija Nalis (2023-04-01 00:15:17+00:00):  Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site ? Do you have any pointers to documentation of it?
sorcrosc (2020-01-04 00:34:13+00:00): Continuo a farti notare che stai introducendo errori inserendo parametri che non conosci. Sto verificando e più o meno la metà sono sbagliati.
Proprietà dei tetti e soprattutto le altezze che ti ostini ad inserire ipotizzando i piani e facendo per tre, non considerando che la misura deve comprendere il tetto.
Questi parametri ipotetici non devi inserirli, spetta agli utilizzatori dei dati impostare dei valori di default per la rappresentazione e se non lo fanno devi segnalare a loro il problema.
Se continuerai così sarò costretto a considerare tutti i parametri che inserisci come inaffidabili e a non farmi problemi ad eliminarli piuttosto che verificare...
Lorenzo
mueschel (2020-01-04 10:33:20+00:00): Hi,
could you check these two areas, they have (only) some foreign tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760636714
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760636707
rainerU (2020-01-04 11:27:02+00:00): erledigt
AndriesWijma (2020-06-02 00:50:18+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86067561
mueschel (2020-01-04 10:24:55+00:00): Please make sure you don't upload your internal QA markers ('conn') to the OSM database!
user_5359 (2020-01-04 06:17:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add description like "Private Drive" to the street name. (To mark the highway as private, please  add a tag access=private to the highway).
Marek-M (2020-03-03 07:37:35+00:00): Skrzyżowania w Płoskini są proste, nie wymagają dodawania linków.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/79176007
Warin61 (2020-01-04 06:54:26+00:00): And brake the Fadden and the Gowrie admin boundaries .. Could you please take care of these admin boundaries when you do your edits? 

Fixed.
letihu (2020-01-09 15:46:06+00:00): Das Haus
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760638565/history
ist ja ganz schön, aber warum steht es auf dieser Skulptur
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760638565/history
und auf diesem
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760638565/history
Weg?
xronos (2020-07-13 11:55:17+00:00): There are some misunderstandings when tagging the roads
According to wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified “… is used for … roads … of the interconnecting grid network.” “…and for roads used to connect other towns, villages or hamlets.”

wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dresidential
"is used for roads accessing ... residential areas..."

wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
"Generally for access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc."

wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
"roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc."

If road ended with house, so it is highway=service. if it leads to "nowhere" and does not connect to another road it is highway=track.
jlinfante_import (2020-03-23 20:24:34+00:00): Hola,
podries revisar la localització del poblat íber de Ferradura? No és correcte que el mateix node sigui un dipòsit i un lloc arquelògic.
Salut!