piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LivingWithDragons (2019-01-23 13:30:16+00:00): I did some research to find appropriate tagging, and look at the OSM data of a few unparished areas.

The boundary tag had no more appropriate value documented, and I'm not sure what it would be. I've known boundary=administrative to be used widely, including where it is not such a formal/legal definition. The unparished boundaries do have a precise definition, and in places like County Durham I've known them to be used for purposes such as directed funding and statistics.

I did not come across the mailing list thread that you've linked to. It seems the solution there was that these could remain if boundary=place is done (all other tags could exist).  The wiki documentation should be updated to suggest that.
will_p (2019-01-23 23:54:10+00:00): I'm not aware of boundary=administrative commonly being used for anything other than official administrative boundaries, although I'm only familiar with tagging used in the UK. I know unparished areas are sometimes used for statistics and I recognise that might be an argument for adding these areas in some form, but I don't think boundary=administrative is the right way.

These boundaries were previously added in 2016, and then following discussion most were either retagged or deleted. At that time there were several objections and little support for adding them. 

Retagging as boundary=place might be appropriate in some cases, although it is complicated because these unparished areas often cover several former civil parishes. For example, the Beeston one also includes Attenborough, Bramcote, Chilwell and Toton, and it's questionable whether Beeston as a place should cover all of those. To me, something closer to Beeston's former parish boundaries seems better and then add the other places separately.
LivingWithDragons (2019-01-24 11:01:46+00:00): I'd like to make sure this is tagged right, but I don't want to rush into changing them again.

Nottinghamshire seems to be more unique in the largeness of it's unparished areas. I'll see if I come across anything similar in the UK. boundary=place still allows for all the tags such as names and ids used for statistics. As it needs to be done consistently and maintained, I'll discuss with you and the community but will also see where the wiki could be updated.
will_p (2019-01-24 23:57:37+00:00): I agree it's more important to get the tagging right than to change things quickly.

My comment regarding boundary=place assumed it would also be tagged with place=town, but I now realise that wasn't what you meant. Using a place boundary with some other place=* value seems sensible to me.
SomeoneElse (2019-01-30 17:29:18+00:00): @LivingWithDragons Sigh.  Did you actually look at the history of any of the objects that you changed here, for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6446737/history , which is "By definition, "East Retford (Unparished)" isn't a civil parish.".  It's a "hole that has no administrative role" (all sing together...).  
Thankfully you've now raised that it https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2019-January/022433.html so we can all point back at the previous discussions on this topic...
SK53 (2019-01-31 12:26:31+00:00): The Beeston unparished area clearly includes separate places Bramcote, Toton, Attenborough, Chilwell & Beeston itself. These are different places, they may have once been in the same Urban District in the past (But I think it was Beeston & Sandiacre). Making them all Beeston not only fails the test of what someone living there would say, but creates issues with, for starters, Meadow Lane, Attenborough and Meadow Lane, Beeston.
francisbarton (2020-02-23 13:14:05+00:00): I have submitted edits to the towns of Sutton-in-Ashfield and Kirkby-in-Ashfield, for consistency with hyphenation and capitalisation.
I wonder if you would agree to carry these formattings over into the unparished area created by this changeset @LivingWithDragons.
mavl (2019-02-26 16:59:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
m@pper (2019-01-23 12:20:03+00:00): completed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
chnav (2019-01-31 06:00:07+00:00): You mustt not delete building tags from amenity, these are different usage tags !!! It definetely can be amenity and building same time. All such ypur edits are subject to review and revert. Please discuss mass edits with community because looks like you understand tagging system wrong. Thanks.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-17 14:56:12+00:00): mechanical removal of landuse from wastewater plants;
malicious deletion of storage tanks (restored)
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
eggie (2019-01-23 12:46:17+00:00): Oke.. permissive wil alleen maar zeggen dat de eigenaar je ten alle tijde de toegang mag ontzeggen. Wanneer je wilt dat het niet routeert voor verkeer kun je er access=private van maken anders stuurt kan een routeplanner je via het clubhuis sturen.
Nu nog road omzetten in =service denk ik.
eggie (2019-01-23 13:05:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
flohoff (2019-01-25 13:03:54+00:00): Moin Vera,
du hast hier einiges an landuse in dem changeset eingetragen. Super.

Mir ist aufgefallen das die teilweise überlappen. Das kann eigentlich nicht sein. Entweder die Fläche ist Wald oder Wohngebiet - Beides übereinander geht eigentlich nicht.

Flo
flohoff (2019-01-28 19:00:27+00:00): Hi,
ich habe die landuses da mal aufgeräumt

Flo
praeteritum (2023-08-21 04:12:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140160192.
lleung (2019-07-07 16:51:17+00:00): 为啥把军区内部的道路都标记成三级道路呢？不属于公共道路系统啊
viloan (2019-01-23 12:50:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
praeteritum (2023-08-20 08:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140121467.
eggie (2019-01-23 13:06:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-01-23 13:15:53+00:00): Dag Mick,
Keurig ingetekend, maar... in OSM tekenen we niet zelf gebouwen in. Die worden periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadster.
Je kunt dat ook versnellen door een verzoek in te dienen op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAGimport. Dan komen de Kadstergegevens en adresnodes vanzelf mee. Doe je het zelf?
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
Inlog identiek aan OSM account met wat vertraging wegens accountcheck.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-23 13:20:05+00:00): Ik heb het gebouw even goedgelegd conform de Kadsterlijnen. BGT omtrekgericht. Beter is het om het hele gebouw incl van Nelle opnieuw te laten importeren. 
Eggie
praeteritum (2023-08-20 08:05:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140120971.
praeteritum (2023-08-19 07:27:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140083632.
praeteritum (2023-08-19 07:26:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140083600.
eggie (2019-01-23 13:27:28+00:00): Oke, maar de dakrand geeft een vertekend beeld. 
Eggie
Mick de Jong (2019-01-23 13:32:17+00:00): Ja, daar zat ik een beetje mee te puzzelen. Excuses. Eerste keer bijwerken.
eggie (2019-01-23 13:52:00+00:00): Mocht je willen doorzetten dan kun je het beste overstappen naar editor JOSM. Daar heb je veel meer mogelijkheden zoals de BGT omtrekgericht op de achtergrond. Dan zie je de contouren van het Kadaster. Editor iD heeft dat allemaal niet.
Kijk eens naar:
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

en voor de achtergronden naar
Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM. 
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg

Het beste kun je even een import aanvragen, want bij de volgende update staan er twee gebouwen. :)
Geef even een seintje als je dat niet ziet zitten. 

Succes,
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-23 13:54:50+00:00): .. of had je het bestaande Van Nelle gebouw alleen gesplitst.. dan zou ik het verder zo laten.
het ligt verder goed nu.  
mapse verder.. 
Eggie
Mick de Jong (2019-01-23 14:45:29+00:00): Ik had het gebouw alleen opgesplits, ik gebruik de OpenStreetMaps API om een locatie weer te geven in monitoring software voor computer systemen. Ik heb systemen in SmartDC staan, welke door OpenStreetMaps niet herkend werd. Dus die wou ik toevoegen :)

Bedankt voor de tips, ik ga kijken of ik meer wil toevoegen.
multimodaal (2020-01-06 21:53:14+00:00): Buenas noches, disculpas por no poder escribir en español ....  

In this changeset you have -by accident I assume- deleted al 1.910 members of the Transandalus from the relation. 

This relation now is empty (no members):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2853232/
 
See also the link below; scroll all the way to the right: http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=2853232

I looked at a revert this changeset, but that gives quite some conflicts since it has been a year ago.

Are you able to repair the damage yourself or should we try another way?

Saludos desde holanda.
multimodaal (2020-01-28 22:12:47+00:00): Attempted to restore in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80220881 

Had to ditch some ways because their id's didn't exist anymore. Around Marbella and Malaga parts of the route are still missing, maybe this was also the case in previous versions?
Chris Fleming (2019-02-01 13:13:12+00:00): HI, thanks for fixing this up. Edit looks great.
eggie (2019-01-23 14:39:31+00:00): De info bij name= "straatnaam" heb ik onder description gezet. het is immers niet de straatnaam . ...dat zou Langeweg moeten zijn. 
De velden zullen op de meeste kaarten niet te zien zijn, want die horen als inner in een multipolygoon. iets voor later zorg.
De atletiekbaan en de voetbalvelden heb ik nu in zo'n mp gezet. De tennisbanen kun je een keer zelf doen, maar dan moeten ze wel losliggen. 
Eggie
viloan (2019-01-23 13:23:11+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-01-23 13:24:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-03-28 14:33:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes. I have modified your entry.
Morten Lange (2019-01-24 21:11:10+00:00): Flott vinna hjá þér ! 
Varstu annars búinn að taka eftir því að Gul leið og Blá leið birtast með merkimiða í skrunþrepum 11 og 12, en ekki t.d Rauð og Græn. Ég hef leitað en ekki fundið muninn í skilgreingunum á þeim.  Bkv. Morten
Morten Lange (2019-01-24 21:19:23+00:00): Gæti verið lús hjá Thunderforest sem býr til hjólalaginu á osm.org.  Kemur rétt út hér:https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=12.183333333333332!64.1235!-21.8696
Tómas Ingi (2019-01-24 23:31:37+00:00): Já, ég held að það stafi af mismunandi lengd nafnanna. Það virðist sem þrír stafir séu hámark til þess að ref=* birtist á þessum skrunþrepum.
Morten Lange (2019-02-06 22:31:31+00:00): Ah skil. Mætti stytta ref ? Eða óska eftir breytingu hjá opencyclemap?
praeteritum (2023-08-18 05:06:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140039185.
user_5359 (2019-03-28 14:33:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes. I have modified your entry.
eggie (2019-01-23 14:00:34+00:00): Hi.. You removed the buildingtag building=yes?
Why?
Greetz,
Eggie
nina_litvinka (2019-01-23 17:10:03+00:00): Hello! At this point,  a group of buildings was shown with tag = building,, this is incorrect (all this buildings are mapped separately, moreover). Do you think this is a mistake?
eggie (2019-01-23 17:27:02+00:00): Hi.. the problem is the rendering. In fact they are garages underground. This will render at most maps unfortunately.
It's still a point of discussion at the Dutch forum.
For me it's not a problem this amnity=parking will not render as a buiding. Others mappers maybe yes. 
Greetz,
Eggie
nina_litvinka (2019-01-23 20:01:55+00:00): Thank you for the valuable information .. but I I dont know how to use this case for further mapping) I still have little experience ..
Sincerely, Nina
eggie (2019-01-23 20:37:02+00:00): I 'll take notice of it. Don.t worry.
All building are data from the Dutch kadaster. I'll revert your contribution just here to restore the building. .
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-23 20:39:42+00:00): reverted by changeset #66581349  / restored underground parking.
praeteritum (2023-08-18 05:04:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 140039117.
manings (2019-01-24 08:55:37+00:00): Milos flashmob edit, reverted via changeset/66594546
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66570441
mariotomo (2021-04-05 15:03:50+00:00): hola.  tendrás manera de revisar este edificio? "María Teyna de la Paz", que según tu corrección fue construido como iglesia, pero ya no tiene esta función?
Alvarado2510 (2021-04-09 14:45:19+00:00): Positivo aun tiene esa función.
mariotomo (2021-04-09 19:50:00+00:00): Y entonces? Porqué le quitaste las etiquetas que describen la función? Estás muy cierto del nombre que pusiste?
praeteritum (2023-08-17 06:28:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 139995211.
mavl (2019-02-26 16:59:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
naoliv (2019-01-23 15:08:05+00:00): You have removed `amenity=hospital` from this object.
Was there a reason for this?
eggie (2019-01-23 14:20:49+00:00): Hi.. You deleted a highway=construction 
Why  .. it is not present here? 
Gretz.
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-23 14:23:31+00:00): If you removed a duplicated way your edit was okay.
hannaklimovich (2019-01-25 11:40:41+00:00): Hello! I havent found this road on satellite images and it seems incorrectly. Do you think this is a mistake?
eggie (2019-01-25 20:33:43+00:00): Hi... it is still on the map I noticed as a highway=construction. Perhaps next year the road is visable at a satelite immage..
Greetz.. eggie
hannaklimovich (2019-01-26 08:41:32+00:00): Ok, thank you for advice.
naoliv (2019-01-23 15:09:24+00:00): And here you have removed "amenity=school" from this object.
This change also doesn't seem to be right.
Nmxosm (2019-01-23 21:11:24+00:00): Hallo gormo,

du hast bei https://osm.org/way/665597201 "Neubau eines Wohnhauses, genaue Ausdehnung unklar" als Namen angegeben. Laut OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name) ist das kein Name, sondern gehört eher unter fixme=... oder note=...

VlG Nmxosm
gormo (2019-01-23 22:15:56+00:00): Danke, geändert!

In meiner "normalen" Mappinggegend wird aber bei Baustellen auch gern mal so ein sprechender Name gesetzt, auch wenns nicht 100% regelkonform ist. Aber wenn ihr das in FFM nicht so haben wollt, gern!
Nmxosm (2019-01-24 06:40:34+00:00): Hi gormo,

vielen Dank fürs Ändern. Ich kann gut nachvollziehen, dass man das auch mal in den Namen schreibt und es gibt sicher auch Vorteile.

Ich mache das gerne so, damit die Dokumentation (auf die man sich hoffentlich mal gemeinsam verständigt hat), konsistent bleibt/wird. 

"Ihr in FFM" davon hätte ich gerne mehr, vor allem in Bezug auf Kommunikation. =D Beim Überprüfen von Änderungen sehe ich ca. 5 aktive OSMler und bin ziehmlich sicher der einzige in der Umgebung, der regelmäßich Änderungssatzkommentare verfasst.

VlG Nmxosm
RafalR (2019-01-24 00:08:05+00:00): Staraj się unikać przypadkowych połączeń i przesunięć - https://i.imgur.com/ML6yGv9.png
maraf24 (2019-01-27 22:08:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4540363615
Tu jest chyba wieś, a nie kolonia.
naveeed11 (2019-01-23 14:49:45+00:00): https://activatorproductkey.org/
https://crackedleval.com/
https://proproductkey.com/
flohoff (2019-01-25 13:02:00+00:00): Moin,
in diesem changeset steht du hast Streuobstwiesen eingezeichnet. Dabei hast du scheinbar aber von einer relation as admin_level 8 gelöscht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/79194

Garmin User scheint das schon wieder repariert zu haben.

Flo
Robert46798 (2019-01-24 07:53:37+00:00): Hello xtwiand,

unfortunately, you did not pay attention to the offset of the aerial photograph when making your changes. If you press [B] in your editor, you can select the background image. If you scroll down, you can select the function to move the aerial image until it matches the existing data!

The changes weren't that good either. You have deleted the buildings. It is better to modify existing data, because the past of the data remains traceable in the database. In addition you have combined several buildings to one and have not paid attention to the correctness of the angles.

Unfortunately, the deterioration of the data is so great that I will revert the changes immediately.

Greetings,
Robert
Robert46798 (2019-01-24 07:55:51+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz wurde mit dem CS 66593085 zurückgesetzt.
yaugenka (2019-01-23 15:41:59+00:00): Ваши переименования рек нарушают основные правила наименования:
1. name:<lang> должно быть только одно основное название, остальные валидные альтернативные называния должны быть в alt_name:<lang>
2. нелокализированный тег может содержать несколько названий на языках стран, через которые она протекает, но тогда следует разделять их (обычно с помощью "/")
3. в Беларуси принято писать основное название на русском, а вы положили в name еще и белорусское название
4. вы ввели несуществующие (ничем не подтвержденные) варианты названий на английском языке (name:en).

Ваши изменения будут откачены!
Вижу что и другие реки были изменены по такому же принципу. Он и будут откачены также!
user_6110846 (2019-01-23 16:12:01+00:00): никаких правил нет 
я прямолинейно спрашивал о етом правиле в двг и просил ссылку

newpavlov росиянин  писал тоже в ДВГ

и писал он 2 или три недели назад 

нечего ему не пришло 

подобный запрет хотелд навязать в обьекте Чонгарська протока росиянин 

Решаем таким оьбразом --  будет как я сделал 

покажете правило с статусом международное и обязательное к исполнению всеми сообществами четко написанное с wiki openstreetmap или с иного сайта правил ------ 

нент вопроса вернем 1 название 

Поетому  если хотите только 1 название --  ищите ссылку на правило 


договоренности Белоррусского сообщества не пройдут потому что ето  договоренности  локального употребления 

Например в Украине два названия пропускаютьсяч потому что у нас есть улицы с 2 официальными  названиями или реки с двумя названиями (встречал )
user_6110846 (2019-01-23 16:14:08+00:00): я все верну 
пиши в двг 

я найду подтверждение и двг разрешит 
я отвоевал в дискуссии перевод Kyiv 
отвоюю и етот 
Украиснкий перевод Zholon существует сто пудово 

завтра покажу и откачу завтра ваш реверт
yaugenka (2019-01-23 17:45:41+00:00): Пункт 1 описан на
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
Цитирую:
"Multiple names
If you have multiple names for a feature, first try to choose a rich semantic tag like any of the ones in the table (like short_name=*, old_name=* etc.). If none of them works, choose the alt_name=* tag. If there are multiple names that do not fit, alt_name=* can be used with semicolons."
Пункт 2 и 3 - не вам решать на каком языке нам белорусам писать, свои украинские названия можете писать как хотите, наши будьте добры не трогать.
Пункт 4 - предоставьте подтверждение о существовании подобных названий, и в соответствии с пунктом 1 занесите их в alt_name:en.
Спасибо!