piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Alex_Enot (2019-07-15 09:42:29+00:00): Отметил. По фен-шую на quarry ещё надо ставить оператор "ООО Глория", но тогда на карте будет две Глории рядом. Я не поставил, но, по большому счёту, мне всё равно.
Jacopo (2025-01-30 20:14:57+00:00): Ciao
I've deleted today this POI as it was not present at the location, can you confirm it was present at the moment of creation of the node? Also the other charging station you mapped are physically present in reality?
eggie (2019-03-18 15:55:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-03-20 12:25:49+00:00): (PB contact)
De opgeloste fouten zijn acties van mij geweest denk ik.  

Wellicht heb je hier iets aan.

editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

en

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644
Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM. 
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg

Genoeg nog te doen hier.

Succes,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-20 12:33:26+00:00): De eerste edits waren uit nov 2017 o.a. ook van mij bij correcties van een startende mapper.
SK53 (2019-06-21 14:49:20+00:00): Is the Harley really a hotel, looked a bit dive like to me from outside. At best I'd think of it as a pub with rooms. I'm not sure having 2 nodes is right in this case. (PS. I know it's not your original mapping, but it looks as if you checked it recently)
SK53 (2019-06-21 14:50:00+00:00): Incidentally whatpub says it's closed, but was obviously open n Tuesday
pyrog (2020-08-29 06:24:41+00:00): Bonjour Olivier,

Il ne faut pas mettre un tag amenity=parking sur un des nœud du polygone d'un parking.

Par exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6345170168

De plus il faut mettre un seul polygone pour l'ensemble du parking.
Ensuite il est possible d'en faire un par place.

Par exemple :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677659949
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677761658

Cordialement,

__
Yves
Roman Glasauer (2019-03-18 15:32:07+00:00): MAJ des double-sens cyclables rue R Rolland et R des Champes Elysées à Gentilly
woodpeck (2019-03-19 22:04:34+00:00): In this changeset you have added the tag "boundary=protected_area" to all *nodes* making up the boundary of a protected area. JOSM should actually show warnings for that, please double check! Also from the amount of data you added this looks like an import. As you know imports require prior discussion in the community. Please show me where your import has been discussed. Thanks!
woodpeck (2019-03-19 22:06:11+00:00): I notice that this problem is much bigger than I first saw. You have added thousands of nodes wrongly tagged. I will revert your imports.
Jakka (2019-03-19 08:40:07+00:00): Hier heb ik een typ foutje verbetert eruit gehaald:...Fri... Fr twee letters ipv 3
azakh-world (2019-03-25 14:24:46+00:00): Hi.
There must be only one object with "railway=station" tag and it has already existed. The station is underground, you should not put this tag onto overground buildings.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:11:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
iWowik (2021-10-20 07:09:29+00:00): Вы добавили еще один сбербанк 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6339951146/history
к уже существующему https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2937520411/history
parukhin (2021-10-20 08:21:31+00:00): Это разные отделения в одном здании, разные ref, разные режимы работы.
jmapb (2019-03-27 22:54:30+00:00): Hi Chavaleiba, welcome to Openstreetmap! I'm a mapper active in NYC and noticed this change. 

If this school has moved to a new building, the correct way to show that is to find (or create) the new location on the map, and tag that with the school's info. In this case, you've changed the address of this building to Rutland Road, but the building itself hasn't moved -- it's still on Eastern Parkway, so it still needs to be tagged with the Eastern Parkway address.

Let me know if you need help fixing this -- I'm happy to advise or assist.

Thanks, jmapb
zorkonius (2019-03-18 15:44:14+00:00): Bad checkin comment; meant to read: Updates to Forsyth Quarry.
Glassman (2019-03-18 19:17:32+00:00): Nice - keep up the good work
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68262749
(yo) (2019-03-18 15:57:21+00:00): 新設スマートIC（舘山寺SIC）の名称を地図上のどのノードに書き入れるのが適切なのかを知りません。どなたか追記をお願いします。
yumean1119 (2019-03-20 14:48:45+00:00): インターチェンジを表すhighway=motorway_junctionのタグは、高速道路の本線(highway=motorway)から出口に向かう道(highway=motorway_link)が分岐する位置に置くのがよいとされています。詳しくは
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction
をご覧ください。

これに従って、上下線から出口に分岐するノードにタグ付けをしてみました。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68338846
ただし、私は岡山県在住のため、このスマートICの番号、および料金所の位置を調べられませんので、現地に行ける方の編集をお願いしたいです。
flohoff (2019-03-19 13:07:49+00:00): Moin,
das ist schon richtig das der Supermarkt auf einem Node ist.

Wir haben mal auf der osm owl mailingliste besprochen das wir nach möglichkeit POIs als Nodes erfassen und nciht auf dem Gebäudeoutline. Dafür duplizieren wir die Adresse auf den Node und dann alle zusätzlichen tags auf dem Node.

Der Vorteil ist das wenn der laden auszieht oder zu macht man einfach den Node löscht und nicht aufwendig die tags auseinanderpfriemeln muss. Das führt mitunter dazu das das tags zurück bleiben bzw aus versehen welche die zum gebäude gehören miot gelöscht werden. (Dachform etc)

Flo
Mofte105 (2019-03-19 13:18:30+00:00): Moin!
Hier habe ich auch etwas hin und her überlegt und im Internet diverse Diskussionen gefunden (natürlich nicht die von OWL-Liste), und mich dann für diese Variante entschieden, weil es sich um ein explizites Supermarktgebäude handelt. 

Also ist OWL-Konsens alle Geschäfte als Node zu erfassen? 
Wie sieht das bei Gaststätten aus, die auch vom Gebäude her so angelegt sind?
flohoff (2019-03-19 13:30:25+00:00): Nicht nur Geschäfte - alles was du an POIs hast. 

Und das es ein Supermarktgebäude ist ist ja richtig. Aber heute zieht der frishemarkt aus und morgen der Netto ein. Neuer name, neue Telefonnummer, neue Öffnungszeiten. Das Gebäude unverändert (Also Dachform, Lage, Adresse etc).

Wenn der Frischemarkt dann auszieht löscht du den node - und wenn der Netto einzeiht erfasst du die daten und packst die wieder auf einen Node.

Das ganze ist unfallfreier zu machen als immer die Tags auf den Gebäudeumrissen zu sortieren. Was gehört zum Gebäude, Was zum POI etc.

Wir haben das hier mal so diskutiert. Das heisst nicht jetzt loszurennen und alles umzutaggen. Aber da wo du es eh anfasst würde ICH und viele andere in OWL so machen.

Ganz Problematisch wird das dann beim routing. Eine Routingsoftware wird dich auf einer Straße möglichst nah an deinen POI führen. Wenn du jetzt die Informationen auf dem Gebäude hast kann es dir passieren das du auf einer Mitarbeiterzufahrt dahinter am nächsten dran bist. 

Wenn du den POI auf einem Node hast kannst du den Exakt da hinlegen wo du möchtest das jemand hin navigiert.

Mir ist das mal passiert als ich zum Flughafen Paderborn navigiert habe. Da stehst du dann wohlmöglich im Wald jenseits des Terminals im Wald vor dem Zaun. Ist eben am nächsten dran.

POIs als Fläche ist sehr Fehlerträchtig und Kompliziert.

Ich würde eben immer Gebäude von der Funktion trennen. Ist eigentlich auch OSM standard. Ein Objekt, eine Funktion.

D.h. du hast das Gebäude mit seinen Attributen und dann hast du einen Node im Gebäudeoutline das dann die informationen zum Shop, Gaststätte etc enthält.

Flo
Mofte105 (2019-03-19 13:33:39+00:00): Danke für die ausführliche Antwort, kann ich so nachvollziehen und nehme mir das für zukünftige Änderungen zu Herzen. 
Und das große Umtaggen wollte ich jetzt auch nicht starten. ;-)
SomeoneElse (2019-12-30 16:07:13+00:00): Can you check that the wikidata Q190464 on the HSBC in here is actually correct (i.e. the object is not a retail bank)?
Best Regards,
Andy
Jakka (2019-03-19 08:35:11+00:00): Hoi Karel, bedankt voor toevoegen van ontbrekende zaken. Maar een tip zoals dit vb een parking kan onmogelijk een gebouw overlappen, tenzij P ondergronds is of gebouw een overkapping heeft. Gebruik de laag GRB en vergelijking met  luchtfoto's deze kunnen een verkeerd beeld geven ...https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=677684221#map=20/50.77029/4.53397 graag berichtje na verbetering.
andershl (2019-03-27 13:16:20+00:00): This is one of 9 change sets introducing base geographical names for North Eastern Greenland. For more information see http://www.xoz.dk/public/nordost/
muralito (2019-03-18 20:20:38+00:00): Hola Juan.

Tene cuidado de no duplicar los elementos. Si los limites cambiaron, generalmente no se agrega un multipoligono nuevo, sino que al existente se lo modifica para que tome la nueva extension.
tux67 (2019-03-18 16:37:18+00:00): Hi, hab's gerade mal grob angesehen .. sieht gut aus, aber ich hatte es noch nicht gemappt, da Mapillay und mein GPS Track noch was ungenau schienen. Vielleicht macht ein fixme noch sinn um das upzudaten wenn neue Luftbilder da sind?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68263589
tux67 (2019-03-23 18:01:31+00:00): Hab' das ganze auch noch mal mit mapillary abgefahren:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=YjNNYT3NvwAhQi06mt95VQ&focus=photo
Alecs01 (2019-03-18 19:50:13+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, non fidarti delle immagini di Bing, sono sgranate e male allineate, meglio quelle che si chiamano Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta. In ogni caso, per disegnare gli edifici bisogna seguire il profilo della base e non del tetto, la prospettiva può ingannare.
rab (2019-03-19 20:27:28+00:00): Highway=road is always wrong!
viloan (2019-03-18 16:12:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Alecs01 (2019-03-18 20:01:59+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, ho notato che hai cancellato il tag place da Muggiò a Como, l'ho ripristinato https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4439722826/history
tux67 (2019-03-18 17:16:05+00:00): Hallo Doktor_D,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
2 kleine Hinweise. Bitte die Gebäude bei weiteren Edits mit der entsprechenden Rechtsklick Funktion rechtwinklig machen und einen Quellenangabe erfassen (ich nehme mal an local kowledge (Hausnummern) + Luftbild (Gebäude))

Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
Stephan (tux67)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68264047
eggie (2019-03-18 16:39:01+00:00): Peter.. Hier dus aangeven "wandelpad toegevoegd" 
Die comment-regel blijft altijd hetzelfde anders. 
Prima bijdrage overigens.
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-18 16:37:28+00:00): Peter.. geef concreet aan wat je doet. Dus reshape roads oid.
Lokale mappers willen weten wat je doet.
Gr eggie
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Supaplex (2019-04-07 14:47:06+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站   http://www.openstreetmap.tw (暫時下架)
OSM.TW 備份站 https://assanges.github.io/osmtw-ghpage/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Chris Fleming (2019-03-19 12:14:57+00:00): Again my previous comments about areas apply here - also why remove fences mapped by local surveyors?
JonKrato (2019-03-21 16:20:17+00:00): Thanks for reaching out. I moved location of fences so that they were not intersecting or blocking roads. I believe that area=yes combined with highway=* has been tagged incorrectly.

Here is a passage from the Wiki. 
"Using area=yes paired with existing highway=* tags would lead to unpredictable routing results and is only widely accepted and evaluated for highway=pedestrian".

References: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area:highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area.3Dyes_on_a_highway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway
Chris Fleming (2019-03-21 17:21:23+00:00): So looking at the history, it looks like the fence ran up to (and shared a node) with the road, but didn't cross the road. So would be fine. 

It also looks like you completely removed the playground? What was this based on?

Also a pipeline: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581021021/history#map=18/55.72007/-2.74934

I actually think that highway=service area=yes is fine for the yards even if it's an uncommon use; it does seem appropriate. But I would be happy to look at considering other tagging options for these, if you have a better suggestion?
JonKrato (2019-03-21 19:26:11+00:00): I would like to reach a mutual solution to this issue, so I will do some more research and run some options by you. The highway=* and area=yes combo has been used on more than just service roads. It has been used on tertiary, residential, and unclassified roads. To my understanding the area=yes on a highway is typically used for pedestrian areas, or service areas where vehicles drive without prescribed lanes, but there has not been an agreement on how highway tag values other than pedestrian should be treated when also tagged with area=yes.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area#Highway_areas
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area:highway#Differentiation_area:highway_vs._area.3Dyes_on_a_highway
Chris Fleming (2019-03-22 11:05:16+00:00): I note on that same page it says: . "Do not alter your mapping to accommodate such routers. " - this applies to road areas as much as Service. For now I suggest that we revert this set of changes and start again on them? Sticking to genuine issues and not removing vast amounts of mapping. If routers are having problems with highway areas then perhaps they should just ignore them or fix their code.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:11:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
mariotomo (2021-04-19 14:29:33+00:00): hola. ojalá vuelvas a mapear, revisa las páginas wiki y el forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
motogs (2019-10-28 14:51:53+00:00): Hi MGSpiller,
I’ve been adding/developing objects in Slaithwaite for a while, and although in many cases I’ve added premises numbers and names, in most of those I hadn’t got as far as adding the village or street names.
I see that you’ve been adding these in a number of cases, so many thanks for that - it saves me having to go back and do that!
You’ve added a number of addr:hamlet=Slaithwaite tags and I see that I’ve added at least one myself (way No.465925686).
As Slaithwaite is rather bigger than a hamlet (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dhamlet), having a population of getting on for 3,000, would you be happy for me to change all the occurrences of addr:hamlet=Slaithwaite (including from other changesets) to addr:village=Slaithwaite?  Although addr:village isn’t specifically mentioned in the wiki, it’s used over 100,000 times.
I didn’t want to do this without discussing with you first.
Cheers, motogs
trigpoint (2019-03-18 18:19:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Please could you explain what this is intended to be?
oomagoolies (2019-03-19 01:53:54+00:00): Sorry I was trying to put a personal note and dont know how to remove it
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
jpennycook (2019-03-18 17:50:47+00:00): Hello.
The name "Wasing Way" is on the relations, so tagging it on the ways is redundant - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9282946 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9282947#map=15/51.3915/-1.1463&layers=CN.
The cycle route name shows up in OpenCycleMap from the relation, and a decent journey planner will also use the relation name.

Jon
sommerluk (2019-03-18 17:56:01+00:00): 👍 Merci bien !
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-04-12 23:43:50+00:00): Essas não são vias secundárias, mudei para residencial ;)
ronv10 (2019-03-22 00:25:56+00:00): Updated the building name, added facility information and physical and email address of the building
ronv10 (2019-03-22 00:27:13+00:00): Updated the attributes of the Registrar’s Office
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-19 21:19:57+00:00): Hi 8000UptownManagement. Did you mean to change this location to a recreation ground?
This is the OSM wiki page for recreation grounds: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground you will notice it mentions An open green space for general recreation, which often includes formal or informal pitches, nets and so on - which doesn't appear to describe the local in the most recent satellite imagery (it looks like a new block of apartments? 
The construction tag was already removed, so you don't need to worry about that either way :)
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-19 21:20:32+00:00): describe the location*
ndm (2019-03-18 19:29:29+00:00): I've redrawn these "ruins" from the satellite imagery. Large areas are more likely to be better tagged as landuse. Buildings should be smaller/more detailed.
eggie (2019-03-18 19:33:13+00:00): Dag Yannick.. Het is beter om niet eerst een weg te verwijderen en dan opnieuw in te tekenen. De "historie" gaat dan verloren. 
Dit waren je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68267178

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-18 19:41:58+00:00): Heb je er rekening mee gehouden dat er twee wanderoutes over dit stukje lopen? 
Dat zijn relaties. Met editor iD kun je eigenlijk niet goed wandelroutes bewerken.
Wellicht heeft iemand de routes weer hersteld of heb je dit zelf gedaan?

Een highway=service heeft geen tracktype. Dat is een eigenschap van een highway=track. Die regel moet dus weg. Wel kun je de surfacetag toevoegen. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-18 19:46:51+00:00): nodes amenity parking verwijderd
Dat was "driedubbel"
ronv10 (2019-03-22 00:20:36+00:00): Added a forest area near Registrar's Office
PT-53 (2020-07-24 10:45:02+00:00): Hallo 19timber96,
im OSM-Forum gibt es unter
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=795517#p795517
eine Frage zu dieser Fläche:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677709280/history
Es wäre schön, wenn Du diese Frage im OSM-Forum beantworten würdest.
Grüße
EvertonBortolini (2019-03-18 18:24:16+00:00): Olá Jhonata! Aqui é o Everton Bortolini da comunidade do OpenStreetMap Brasil. Vejo que o Biopark é um projeto novo. As feições que você editou já estão construídas ou você está usando como base os layers do projeto? Att!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68267692
jhonatabf (2019-04-01 18:13:24+00:00): Olá, o local está em obras e algumas ruas já fora feitas, a fonte foi o próprio material de divulgação (https://www.biopark.com.br/common/uploads/0e9ab8c0cd9f19f0d20aab2c4f78bc7b/f06455da552d8e7f54140cfd4b2e6385.pdf) do Biopark, como também alguns documentos públicos disponíveis para visualização e leis (http://www.toledo.pr.gov.br/sapl/sapl_documentos/norma_juridica/13851_texto_integral) (http://www.iap.pr.gov.br/arquivos/File/2017_EIA_RIMA/Vitoria_RIMA_BioparkToledo.pdf), entre outros. Na verdade, eu havia percebido que o mapeamento que existia no local não condizia com os documentos divulgados, então resolvi corrigir. As vias que estão em faze de construção, possuem a tag construction nelas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68267692
viloan (2019-03-18 18:12:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
andershl (2019-03-27 13:17:01+00:00): This is one of 9 change sets introducing base geographical names for North Eastern Greenland. For more information see http://www.xoz.dk/public/nordost/
mariotomo (2021-09-14 22:24:29+00:00): hola … estás muy seguro que la calle D y la otra más al Sureste existen con esta extensión?  en Maxar todavía no aparecen.  no sé si son tuyos los datos GPS en OSM, pero sólo se extienden hasta la mitad de lo que has mapeado.  quizás quieres revisarlo, si vuelves a pasar por el lugar?