piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Alan Bragg (2017-09-12 11:03:52+00:00): Thanks, tags have been deleted.
Alan
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-10 09:09:45+00:00): Hallo black_bike. Mit diesem Änderungssatz hast du drei neue keys "section:name", "section:type" und "section:type:criteria" eingeführt. Leider habe ich nichts dazu gefunden oder eine entsprechende Diskussion darüber verpasst. Magst du mich ein bisschen erhellen?
EinKonstanzer (2017-09-10 14:52:08+00:00): Das sind Zusatzinfos wie der Grenzverlauf zurstande kommt. Ganz nützliche Info finde ich und auch in der Form nicht störend. Meine Meinung.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-10 15:00:29+00:00): Ok, schön und gut. Trotzdem sollte meiner Meinung nach aber diese Keys ja irgendwo definiert sein und auch was die entsprechende Werte (welche gibt es überhaupt) aussagen.
z.B. ist an http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523080647 "section:type=parc" gesetzt? Was ist "parc"? Ok, es ist der Rheinpark, ist es also ein Schreibfehler? Ist "parc" französisch?
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-10 15:01:18+00:00): Und so ganz nebenbei, ist "Düsseldorf Statistisches Jahrbuch 2014" eine OSM Lizenz konforme Quelle?!
black_bike (2017-09-10 21:48:51+00:00): Hallo harald, ich trenne gerade in Düsseldorf Stadtbezirks- und Stadtteilgrenzen von den Bodenobjekten, also Straßen, Eisenbahnlinien und Flußverläufen. Dafür gibt es viele gute Gründe. Ich führe hier nur zwei auf:
1. Zuordnung des Tagings wird klarer (lit=yes bedeutet wahrscheinlich nicht, dass die Stadteilgrenze beleuchtet wird). 
2. OSM-Daten werden "stabiler" wenn die 
Aufteilung einer Straße wegen unterschiedlichen Straßenbelägen nicht mehr die Gefahr birgt mehrere unbeteiligte Grenzrelationen kaputt zu machen.

Werden nun die Grenzverläufe als eigenständige ways in OSM eingetragen, so ist allein aus den Daten nicht mehr ersichtlich, dass ein Grenzabschnitt  einem bestimmten Straßen- oder Flußabschnitt entspricht. 

Es ist noch im Versuchsstadium und ich versuche erstmal zu ermitteln, welche
Arten von Informationen ich finde und wie ich dies in OSM-Form abspeichern kann.

Bisher ermittle ich Art und Namen des Objektes, also im Prinzip das, was gegeben war, als Staßen und Flüße direkte Mitglieder der Grenzrelation waren.

Zusätzlich halte ich noch fest wo sich der Grenzverlauf im Bezug zum Objekt befindet, z.B. Straßen- oder Flußmitte, südlich der Brücke, östlich des Eisenbahnverlaufs.

Ich sammle erstmal Erfahrung mit diesem neuen Feld der Grenzkennzeichnung und werde das dann auch dokumentieren.

Grüße aus Ratingen
  Harald
  black_bike
black_bike (2017-09-10 21:55:18+00:00): Zu section:type=parc :
Ist falsch, englisch Park ist park.
Wird berichtigt.
black_bike (2017-09-10 22:17:41+00:00): Zur Datenquelle Düsseldorfer Statistisches
Jahrbuch 2014:

Die Grenzverläufe werden hier textuell beschrieben. Also z.B. "entlang der Straßenmitte Danziger Straße, Roßstraße, Klever Straße".

Ich halte es für unproblematisch den Grenzverlauf anhand dieser Beschreibung entlang von vorhandenen OSM-Straßenverläufen in den OSM-Datenbestand einzutragen.

Grüße aus Ratingen
   Harald
   black_bike
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-11 07:11:45+00:00): Auch wenn es gut gemeint und eventuell auch gut gemacht ist, wäre es nicht das erste mal, wenn dann ein Shitstorm daraus/darüber entsteht. Es gibt nicht umsonst das aufwendige Proposal Verfahren mit Abstimmung. Und erst Fakten schaffen und dann erst dokumentieren ist auch eher verpönt und wurde auch schon des öfteren abgestraft. Deshalb mein Rat (auch wenn es mir persönlich egal ist): binde die Community frühzeitig mit ein.
highflyer74 (2017-09-10 14:44:25+00:00): In this changeset a triangle shape without any information on it was added. What does that mean? See here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523116878. Also a POI should be placed inside the outline of the proper building and not in front of it, and some other stuff I will fix for you. Don't worry though, everybody has been new to this ;-)

Just be really careful and maybe do some reading about the OSM basics. If you have questions, just let me know!
André Alvarenga (2017-09-10 01:36:38+00:00): Qual validador está indicando aviso para building:part=house ?
Pelo que entendi da wiki é possível usar qualquer tipo válido para building.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
O uso de um ou outro altera a altura padrão na visualização 3D.
adrianojbr (2017-09-10 14:33:56+00:00): foi o nível informacional do validator do josm. mas você está certo.
André Alvarenga (2017-09-11 03:01:36+00:00): Não conhecia esse detalhamento do validador. Ele não está ativo por padrão. Obrigado pela informação.
MichalP (2017-09-12 12:17:50+00:00): v tomto changsete si zakázal prístup na všetky príjazdové rampy. opravíš po sebe?
Rio Parič (2017-09-13 18:56:55+00:00): asi nie, lebo ani nemam tusenie ako som ten zakaz dal. iba som poprehadzoval z rychlostnych na dialnicu.
MichalP (2017-09-14 07:40:02+00:00): ale pridal si oneway=yes na príjazdové rampy (čim sa nedalo dostať autom na dialnicu)
Rio Parič (2017-09-14 17:56:40+00:00): pozeram, ze to robi automaticky, nevsimol som si to.
GerdP (2017-09-10 07:41:20+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=er on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10852908
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10852904
Did you mean service?
pkoby (2017-09-10 12:00:19+00:00): Seems it was fixed. I'm not sure what happened there. But it's all good now. Thanks for pointing it out.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-10 18:44:04+00:00): Hello lollomiola. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3420462244 you have introduced the key `name:trentino=Baselga Vecia`. It's common to use name:<language_isocode>, but `trentino` doesn't seems to be a language isocode. Therefore i would expect it as official_name or loc_name? Please have a look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
lorenzomf97 (2017-09-10 18:47:27+00:00): Trentino is a Northern Italy dialect which has similar charateristic from Venetian language and Lombard Language. I don't think there is an official code for this dialect
user_5359 (2017-09-10 06:11:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
fatuus (2017-09-10 08:04:18+00:00): Good job with all the islands!
M!dgard (2018-01-26 20:12:57+00:00): Hi sperlingskauz

We don't add addr:postcode or addr:city in Flanders, and certainly not addr:country. Those can be calculated from the postal code and administrative boundaries, those are complete in Flanders.

.

It is preferable to have source tags on objects in Dutch or English, not German (you add "source=AGIV Flandern GRB" on https://osm.org/way/508757442 ). And actually, we just write "source=GRB".
sperlingskauz (2018-01-27 12:51:41+00:00): Hi M!dgard,

In https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:addr  I have not found anything about a regional agreement for Flanders. And "AGIV Flandern GRB" is exactly the name used in JOSM for the background map.

I was on holiday in Belgium last autumn and saw that there is still a lot to map. So I made additions and corrections wherever I was.

It is not fair not to publish existing agreements and demand them afterwards.

Please donate a sentence in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:addr  about the agreement for Flanders. And please open a ticket to JOSM, so that the name of the background map is corrected there.

Feel free to correct my "mistakes". 

Regards,
sperlingskauz
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:07:47+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
grouper (2017-09-10 17:33:49+00:00): This is a barely visible track and it doesn't connect to anything. I changed it from unclassified to highway=track. Please finish connecting this to something or it needs to be deleted. Did you map with a GPS?
user_5359 (2017-09-10 05:50:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this a private number? Don't add any private information!! Is this a public phone? You forgot to add the tag amenity=telephone (and properly some other information like address, type of business etc)
user_5359 (2017-09-10 06:08:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
Supaplex (2017-09-10 06:27:11+00:00): 整棟都是聚會所嗎？
林子筠 (2017-09-10 06:36:34+00:00): 1-7號的1樓整層都是，2-5樓則為住家
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:08:13+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Polarbear-repair (2017-09-15 17:24:16+00:00): Does this edit mean you have used an automatic translation tool "Abyssinica Translator" to create the town name in the Amharic language? 
During the history of this node, you have even used different such names? First 'ነጩን' and later 'ሮቤ' ?
5m4u9 (2017-09-10 18:37:21+00:00): ya existe un punto creado para el centro de convenciones.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4756734172

gracias por intentar mejorar el mapa :)
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-11 15:12:10+00:00): Hello DavidJDBA. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523155188 it should be `landuse` instead of `landue`, right? #newkey #typo
didier2020 (2017-09-12 18:18:32+00:00): hi, 
you upload same data several times
you can see issues at
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/byuser/?username=Mansmhmd#
AlaskaDave (2017-09-13 05:43:21+00:00): Source should be ESRI World
Endres Pelka (2017-09-15 12:48:33+00:00): Please do not forget addr:street.
streinger (2017-09-10 18:58:38+00:00): может  быть лучше на зданиях addr:city оставить, т.к. согласно https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr:place?uselang=ru  :
Не могут существовать объекты, на которых проставлены одновременно и addr:place, и addr:street, и значения addr:place и addr:street не совпадают.
П3тр0виЧъ (2017-09-11 01:26:11+00:00): Нет такого города - Экодолье. Лучше вообще и плейс и сити убрать из адресов. Полигон микрорайона есть, этого должно быть достаточно.
streinger (2017-09-11 17:29:13+00:00): Если полигон есть, то можно вообще убрать. Это или посёлок или ЖК,  на оф. сайте написано что это жилой комплекс, на сайте Министерства строительства области в Проекте Экодолье написано посёлок.
П3тр0виЧъ (2017-09-11 18:01:04+00:00): Есть ФИАС и согласно ему это всего лишь район села Ивановка, причём неофициальный.
streinger (2017-09-11 18:20:09+00:00): то, что к Ивановке относится знаю, а в ФИАС, там если через поиск искать, то выдаёт только 2-е улицы из Экодолья :  это Берёзовая и пл.(площадь) Экодолье(на въезде в него находится), может я там не так ищу.
П3тр0виЧъ (2017-09-11 18:26:59+00:00): Все улицы Экодолья в списке Ивановских, только что смотрел.
streinger (2017-09-11 18:52:59+00:00): значит не так искал, я набрал Экодолье и мне выдало всего 2 улицы, остальные из других регионов, но не суть.
Vinber (2023-02-18 09:23:31+00:00): Bonjour @ocivelo,
je propose d'homogéneiser les school:FR=SEGPA (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/t/school-fr-college-segpa/12801/6). Tu as ajouté quelques SEGPA avec par exemple ici shool:FR=seGPA. Est-ce ok pour toi si je passe cela en school:FR=SEGPA  ?
Bonne journée
eggie (2017-09-10 07:59:27+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-10 08:02:55+00:00): hockey kan er af.. Dat wordt niet meer gebruikt.
Jeff Evertse (2017-09-10 08:06:44+00:00): bedoel je het type sport wordt niet meer gebruikt of de tag "hockey" is "field hockey"  wel goed?
eggie (2017-09-10 08:21:32+00:00): hockey is verouderd. field_hockey is goed.
eggie (2017-09-10 08:23:01+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features 
Hier kun je kijken... Ik zag twee tags staan,vandaar...  maar ik heb niet alles paraat.
eggie (2017-09-10 08:06:26+00:00): Wanneer je velden op gras situeert zie je die niet op de afgeleide kaarten zoals ze gebruikt worden in bv de gps. Je ziet alleen het "sport-symbool"
Zulke velden horen dan in een "multipolygon".. te staan met een inner en outer-relatie.. Ik kijk wel even.
maxerickson (2017-09-10 18:49:51+00:00): Hi-

The instructions in the tasking manager have been adjusted to be clearer instead of encouraging highway=unclassified. But just to clarify, driveways are fine to just ignore, or can be mapped as highway=service and service=driveway.

I've adjusted these.

Thanks,

Max
gremi (2017-09-10 18:53:47+00:00): Okay ;)
Thanks
eggie (2017-09-10 08:07:11+00:00): Probeer concreet aan te geven wat je doet. Velden toegevoegd.
eggie (2017-09-10 08:10:21+00:00): Hier heb je de import van de 3dshapes verwijderd.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51899288
Nu loopt wel dat nieuw ingetekende gras door de onderste bosrand heen. Dat zou netjes moeten aansluiten. Overlappingen dus voorkomen.
Tomas Straupis (2017-09-10 09:01:28+00:00): Crap.ru trash reverted.
eggie (2017-09-10 08:13:22+00:00): Hier heb je gebouw nr 22 verplaatst. Was dat echt de bedoeling. De achtergrondfoto vertekent weleens.
Bing ligt er meters naast.
Gebouwen zijn ingemeten door het kadaster en als zodanig geïmporteerd.
Jeff Evertse (2017-09-10 08:14:53+00:00): Ik heb hier de website gebruikt. Fout dus. Kun je dat ongedaan maken?
eggie (2017-09-10 08:19:19+00:00): Ik zal het reverten.
Maar de kadaster pdok 2016 ligt wel goed. De straten kun je wel beter positioneren met de pdok 2016.
even niks doen. dan revert ik even.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51899323
eggie (2017-09-10 08:20:38+00:00): Done
Jeff Evertse (2017-09-10 08:21:50+00:00): Thanks, veel te leren dus. Ik ga eerst maar eens wat meer lezen en daarna bewerken. ;-)
eggie (2017-09-10 08:24:36+00:00): Het is ook gewoon een kwestie veel doen... In het begin worden je edits gevolgd.. ook om te helpen. Succes.
eggie (2017-09-10 08:29:58+00:00): Aan de westkant van de Galileistraat is de situatie totaal anders. Er is een fietspad highway=cycleway en die voetpaden lopen echt anders. Mooi oefenproject om te beginnen.
Jeff Evertse (2017-09-10 08:31:18+00:00): doe ik. Daar kijk ik op uit ;-)
aseerel4c26 (2017-09-10 07:43:34+00:00): siehe dazu auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51571963
aseerel4c26 (2017-09-10 07:43:36+00:00): siehe dazu auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51571963
Warin61 (2017-09-11 22:29:38+00:00): Hi,
Relation 7560478 - for your aerial imagery reference... ? 

1) What aerial reference? Copyright free? Or specific permission given? 

2) You could keep these off the data base by storing them locally as a JOSM layer ...

3) They generate error indication on OSM inspector ... thus my attention. There are no similar things in Australia .. and possibly anywhere else.
aharvey (2017-09-12 00:08:24+00:00): Agree with Warin61 here, a feature in OSM should represent something physically on the ground  (I know this isn't always the case, but generally should apply). So if something exists, like the roundabout, map that, but if nothing exists on the ground, that's not suitable for OSM.

I'd suggest use the existing roundabouts mapped and get the center of them and use that for your purposes.

Or as Warin61 says save these features in your private layer not in OSM.
aaronsta (2017-09-12 05:01:01+00:00): Hi Warin61 and aharvey, this changeset is in response to a message from OSM user hadry. Below is a copy of correspondence between myself and OSM user hadry: Hi Hadry,  Thanks for your message,  yes these were tagged for the renderer, as barrier=fence makes a clearly visible straight line on Mapnik.  I captured some aerial imagery around the time when these were made, and needed to reference the imagery for imagery rectification, so added these lines.  The purpose was to remap this area in greater detail, but I never got around to finishing the project, so never removed the lines.  I have now removed the barrier=fence tagging.  http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51899959  http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7560478  I have retained the ways as it would be useful to use in the near future.  Cheers,  Aaron  On 6/09/2017 9:47 PM, hadry wrote: > > 	 > OpenStreetMap 	OpenStreetMap > > Hi aaronsta, > > hadry has sent you a message through OpenStreetMap with the subject inexistant fences: > hadry 	 > > Hi aaronsta, > > Would you be able to clarify your use of these tags for features that do not exist on the ground? > > barrier: fence > > note: ADDED FOR AERIAL IMAGERY RECTIFICATION, PLEASE RETAIN IN MAP > > eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478643208/ > > I don't understand why they need to be tagged as fence. From an outside point of view, it looks a lot like tagging for the renderer. > > Cheers! > > hadry
aaronsta (2017-09-12 05:09:10+00:00): Following up from this, originally these were created as the roundabouts themselves formed good starting points, but are way to inaccurate to align the images. It was not put in a local dataset as the images were rectified outside JOSM, where wms tiles were supported but any vector data (such as osm files) was not.
aaronsta (2017-09-12 05:13:15+00:00): It may be appropriate to remove these lines, as I am yet to complete mapping the area and may need to use them again it could be useful to retain. The lines now have no tagged attributes aside from the note=*
aharvey (2017-09-12 05:20:31+00:00): The issue is you're using OSM to save data really only useful/specific to you. As you can imagine if everyone started using OSM to tag their personal bookmarks it would clutter the database and make editing real map data more difficult.

So I'd like to see these deleted as they don't correspond to any physical feature and they are specific to your project.

There are other options apart from the OSM database to create custom maps just for yourself which you can add whatever fantasy features you like.
aaronsta (2017-09-13 14:47:12+00:00): Thanks for your message aharvey.
The nodes have now been removed.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52009366
Uploading it to the live server remained the only efficient way to rectify the images which I am aware of. As I required a free and open wms tile service, which included relatively up-to-date map data, and which I could modify (with edits reflected in a timely manner) to include the points to rectify the images against
eggie (2017-09-10 09:01:39+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-10 09:06:31+00:00): Mag je hier werkelijk niet fietsen in de Robiniahout? bicycle=no
Hoe moet je op de fiets bij het buurthuis komen?
Je kunt ook de Robiniahout achter het hek op access=private zetten mocht dit het geval zijn. Dan kunnen de andere tags weg.
mueschel (2017-09-10 11:11:06+00:00): Hi,
we do have the sidewalk key. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
If there is a sidewalk on both sides and both have the same surface the tagging would be

sidewalk = both
sidewalk:surface = asphalt

Jan
5bird (2023-04-10 00:35:14+00:00): Hello Jan,

thank you for your feedback. I just discovered it now by chance. Unfortunately, I didn't get a notification about your comment.

Construction work is currently taking place there. The pavement will have to be checked afterwards (but I won't be able to come on site in the near future).
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-11 15:33:06+00:00): Hello Cascafico. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3735538862 it should be `addr:housenumber` and `addr:street` without blank and spaces, right? #newkey #typo
Cascafico (2017-09-11 16:49:44+00:00): I'll correct ASAP. Tnx
Cascafico (2017-09-13 07:11:08+00:00): Removed invalid tags... 
Disclaimer: editing with OSMand ona 4" smatphone is not easy :-)
Luzandro (2019-11-12 18:52:27+00:00): Hallo,

ich nehme an, du wolltest hier nur EIN Abbiegeverbot vom Parkplatz nach links Richtung Kreisverkehr anlegen?
Es wurden nämlich 3 Relationen angelegt, wovon allerdings 2 kaputt sind und auch keinen Sinn ergeben.

LG Andreas
eggie (2017-09-10 08:55:33+00:00): De sportvelden die op het gras liggen heb ik in een multypoligon gezet. velden als inner,  grass als outer. landuse=grass staaat nu op de relatie. Die zie je dus niet meer staan. Iets voor de toekomst om als voorbeeld te gebruiken.
Tomas Straupis (2017-10-01 07:23:24+00:00): Hi. Please do not change place classifications in Lithuania. We have an agreed schema on how places are classified and all places have already been classified according to that scheme. Now I have to manually revert your changes :-(
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-11 15:07:21+00:00): Hello 25or6to4, at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523224923 you have introduced a new key `Municipal`, what is that? #newkey
25or6to4 (2017-09-12 11:51:53+00:00): Glitch on my part from copying tags from the previous marina shape.  It was supposed to be part of the name.  I fixed it.
mueschel (2017-09-10 11:15:46+00:00): Hi,
zwei Anmerkungen habe ich: Du scheinst von den Bing-Bildern abgemalt zu haben - diese haben hier aber eine schlechte Qualität und auch einen Versatz von mehreren Metern. Schalte besser auf "Esri World Imagery" um, diese Bilder sind wesentlich besser.

Die Häuser sollten auch rechte Winkel bekommen: In iD das Haus markieren und "s" drücken.

Und zuletzt, unter den Häusern liegt noch ein landuse=farmland, hier sollte man die Grenze zwischen Acker und Wohngebiet entsprechend verschieben.

Grüße, Jan
Ambush (2017-09-11 05:49:38+00:00): Привет! 
Спасибо за правку.
Вообще не обязательно (избыточно) указывать город, в котором находится объект (addr:city), потому что этот объект и так находится в административных границах Жлобина и любой софт (и человек) это без проблем поймёт.

add:city есть смысл указать, если объект находится за городом, но адрес у него городской.

Удачного картирования!
stormdemah (2017-09-12 11:02:51+00:00): спасибо, изменения автоматически добавятся в карты maps.me например.
пытаюсь их увидеть с телефона - не получается
Ambush (2017-09-12 13:47:21+00:00): maps.me пересобирает карты OpenStreetMap, кажется, раз в месяц (могу ошибаться), так что надо просто подождать.
eggie (2017-09-10 12:32:35+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
Max-Kritic (2020-11-26 18:14:13+00:00): Avec JOSM et l'Interface de génération de fichiers .osm à partir du cadastre, on peut importer les nouveaux bâtiments

https://josm.openstreetmap.de/
https://cadastre.openstreetmap.fr/
PlaneMad (2017-09-11 14:16:13+00:00): The area near this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523231280/history#map=19/1.35645/103.93680 should ideally be a roundabout according to the imagery
habi (2019-11-21 13:43:21+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5094244228 really an embassy?
Can you tell a bit more about the country?

I came from here, BTW: https://maproulette.org/challenge/2791/task/3124061
PlaneMad (2017-09-11 13:04:46+00:00): This road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523238641/history could probably be split to avoid the multiple 90 degree turns
PlaneMad (2017-09-11 13:07:58+00:00): This road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523236362/history#map=18/1.34829/103.93512 through the building can be split and tagged `tunnel=building_passage` https://www.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-common-features/#intersections
GerdP (2017-09-11 09:40:29+00:00): Hi!
Please check typo highway=2
Baldorider (2017-09-11 15:49:31+00:00): Sorry GeradP did not understand the problem you could explain better?
Did I make any mistakes?
Thank you
Baldorider
GerdP (2017-09-11 15:56:19+00:00): Yes, the tag highway=2 on way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523242790 makes no sense and I don't know what you wanted to map.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Baldorider (2017-09-11 16:07:47+00:00): Ok GeradP understood and correct.
See if it's okay.
Thank you
Baldorider
GerdP (2017-09-12 08:21:18+00:00): Thanks, you may add tracktype to the tracks there, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
Math1985 (2018-03-31 15:38:49+00:00): Ik zie dat je veel winkels hebt toegevoegd in Apeldoorn, goed bezig!