piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Solarisphere (2021-01-11 22:01:08+00:00): Hi alester, do you have any info on this rec site being retired? Or any other info on it? I can't find any record of its existence online other than this deleted object in OSM.

I have visited it and it is still used with a rustic firepit and fresh tire tracks but there are no signs of it being an official rec site.
lakedistrict (2018-10-14 15:42:28+00:00): Should this be tagged as a cafe or restaurant?
mcld (2018-10-14 15:55:34+00:00): Oops, thank you - forgot that tag!
ThomasA (2018-09-10 22:18:30+00:00): I think I missed some points when I tried to tag the brigde crossing the ways beneath. I have tried to follow this up in changeset 62469047
BeKri (2018-10-03 21:54:47+00:00): Servus,
Jepp, den hast Du geändert .. in nix ;-)
Absicht ?
Oder soll es heißen,da ist nix mehr ?
Dann wäre ein "disused:" vor amanity nett,
dann erscheint es wenigsten nicht mehr.
Gruss der BeKri
actiwo (2018-10-04 06:02:34+00:00): Hallo,
das war früher mal ne Kneipe. Jetzt ist es ein Imbiss. Wollte das noch ergänzen, wenn ich den Namen des Imbisses weiss.
Servus und Gruss
Actiwo
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-10 21:47:10+00:00): Feliz Pereira, continuo a aguardar resposta. Será tudo revertido até fundamentar e esclarecer o que foi solicitado multiplas vezes.

cumprimentos e aguardo a sua resposta
Feliz Pereira (2018-09-13 12:08:46+00:00): esta parte é apenas entrada para a Estrada Dr. João Abel de Freitas, tem apenas o sentido de subida e o outro lado tem apenas a saída.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-13 12:37:46+00:00): incorreto, tem duas faixas de rodagem e os dois sentidos por causa do ângulo de viragem para a ER120, devendo o condutor adoptar a via respetiva antes de chegar *a ER 120 consoante vá para Este ou Oeste.
flohoff (2018-09-11 08:53:12+00:00): Hi Mariusz,
du hast hier ein Gebäude von einer Self-Inteersection befreit - Das dingen ist aber nach wie vor krumm und schief und matched nicht dem Luftbild.

Flo
Black_Diamond (2023-08-28 09:11:51+00:00): This “tourist attraction” called a DUMP is of questionable accuracy. There is no path to it. It’s really hard to see it from satellite imagery or from the road. This is being removed. If it is a valid point of interest, please add it back with more information about what kind of attraction it is so that others understand what it really is and can navigate to it safely.
QuartermaineProud (2019-08-15 17:52:27+00:00): This was shortly before the hurricane hit the East Coast.
viloan (2018-09-10 21:53:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-10 22:31:42+00:00): All changesets were reverted until the user replies to the private message and comments on changesets.
Feliz Pereira (2018-09-13 12:11:07+00:00): A Estrada dos Carreireiros, quando0 chega a esta parte de parque divide-se num sentido descendente dá a volta ao parque e sobe pelo outro lado, tendo apenas uma faixa nessa zona
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-13 12:38:38+00:00): Conforme mencionei no outro conjunto de alterações, esta é uma estrada de serviço e não residencial.
Rich1234 (2018-09-11 01:41:52+00:00): Hi.  Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

Just a FYI, but pedestrian crossing ways should intersect at a node with the road ways that they cross, and the intersecting node should itself be tagged as pedestrian crossing.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unconnected_ways, esp. the section titled "Crossing ways" and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing for more details.
ajf3934221 (2018-12-20 21:06:26+00:00): Servus, 
dein Fixme an Knoten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1892474438#map=16/48.5683/8.9687&layers=D ist mir aufgefallen. 


So abwägig finde ich das nicht. Den von Dir gemeinten Spielplatz kenne ich nicht so genau, aber den folgenden, hier ist tatsächlich ein Schutzhütte die den Namen Verdient - warum also prinzipiell nicht? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480034973

Kommst Du dort mal wieder vorbei? 

Grüße, 
Andy
mikkolukas (2019-05-16 23:15:26+00:00): endnu engang ingen covered=yes under broer - og veje der går under broen skal helt specifikt ikke forbindes til selve broen
ThomasA (2019-05-16 23:21:59+00:00): Og endnu engang må jeg på det kraftigste opfordre til, at du lige gider at læse, hvad jeg svarer på dine kommentarer. Se især: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62382462#map=17/57.05488/9.92017
mikkolukas (2019-05-17 01:02:34+00:00): Kom først omkring dem alle nu :)
Map-Peter (2018-09-11 11:50:52+00:00): Hallo GER17, 
bitte beteilige dich aktiv an der Diskussion im Forum ( https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=63092 ) und gehe auch auf alle, bislang noch offenen, Fragen ein, bevor du weitere Änderungen dieser Art vornimmst. Gruß Peter 
PS: Hier fehlen diverse Kennzeichen - es fallen mir spontan folgende ein: MÜR, WRN, RM, NZ, MST, MC, DM und AT. Mir sind ein paar Leute aus Hamburg bekannt, welche Kennzeichen aus den o.g. behalten haben, obwohl sie gar nicht mehr im Landkreis Mecklenburgische Seenplatte gemeldet sind (deren Autos auch nicht). Da stellt sich mir die Frage, ob es Sinn macht Kennzeichen überhaupt in OSM zu erfassen.
mueschel (2018-09-15 13:15:01+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag 'payment:e' on this node - this looks like a mistake, could you check it?

Thanks, Jan
lyctkel (2021-05-21 12:20:17+00:00): Hola Djuan,
actualmente estoy revisando algunas etiquetas y encontré que estás usando payment:e. Según el taginfo (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/payment%3Ae) esta etiqueta se utiliza sólo una vez en el mundo. ¿Es un error tipográfico? Disculpa la extraña traducción automática de mi texto al español.
lyctkel
ff5722 (2018-09-19 13:28:59+00:00): You opened up the expressway for routing, but some exits still have construction tags, do you have information whether they are opened for traffic or not?
Sal73x (2018-09-19 16:49:39+00:00): The article below is saying that the Da Nang-Quang Ngai expressway was opened the 02/09/18. Unfortunately it does not clarify if all exits are complete:

https://english.vov.vn/economy/da-nangquang-ngai-expressway-to-be-inaugurated-on-national-day-382346.vov
Sal73x (2018-09-19 17:28:54+00:00): Just fond some info. Exits for Chu Lai and Dung Quat are still under construction and currently closed (they should be ready by end of Oct 18).
ff5722 (2018-09-19 18:29:55+00:00): Ok thanks, i thought maybe you forgot to open them.
viloan (2018-09-10 22:59:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2020-12-12 05:07:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/33153414/history. What is the mean of the tag city=60600 which you add in version 9?
25or6to4 (2020-12-12 07:08:21+00:00): That's a good question. I have no idea where that came from.
user_5359 (2020-12-12 07:10:33+00:00): Can I clean it up?
25or6to4 (2020-12-12 07:15:17+00:00): Yes, go ahead
Warin61 (2018-09-12 03:22:56+00:00): Hi,
the name tag is only for names - so Omega Apartments (under construction) is not good. 
Use the description tag to describe it .. 
But in this instance use the construction key thus ..
building=construction 
name=Omega Apartments
description=construction of apartments
masojuli (2018-09-10 23:26:40+00:00): I'm sorry I forgot to mention- I also added motor_vehicle=no to the gate on Zelzah Ave based on a visible lock on the Bing streetside imagery
Beddhist (2018-10-21 14:54:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624543246: most of this is a 2-lane asphalt road, with the centre line clearly visible, except for the SW end, which is a track. @ 14.0809452, 101.1350116 you can clearly see the paved road continuing SE (currently marked residential).

*** Most of the ways branching off this, however, are unpaved. ***

Offset seems ok, going by a GPS track a couple of km W.

The irrigation canal running parallel is offset.

About the middle of the long straight one of your colleagues has nicely drawn a couple of bridges. Unfortunately, there aren't any, the canal goes in a culvert, most likely not only under the roads, but also under or through the water body that the road crosses. This, however, clearly is a bridge.
VLD046 (2019-03-06 16:15:38+00:00): The way has been adjusted to residential.
Beddhist (2019-03-07 12:53:22+00:00): In response to my comments 5 months ago Jeff Underwood changed it to unpaved track. Now you change it to a paved residential street. Why?

Reverting it now.
kartonage (2018-09-12 18:27:35+00:00): Hey there davcur81, you have requested a review. Thanks for adding buildings and addresses around here! A quick tip for adding buildings: Pressing 's' when having selected/drawn a building area will square the corners of the rectangulars. Without that it's only natural that they will look crooked, squared corners are hard to draw. Hope this helps.

If you have questions feel free to ask. Otherwise happy mapping!
frosm (2018-09-11 10:57:12+00:00): helo,
what did you mean with a comment "123" ? the shop have moved ? you make a test ?
GerdP (2018-10-01 06:29:35+00:00): Hi! Please check:
What does highway=no mean on this way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85550573 ?
Just a typo?
viloan (2018-09-11 00:57:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
woodpeck (2018-10-09 22:24:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 63360720, 63359357, 63361699 where the changeset comment is: revert buggy automatic edit to traffic sign directions by yopaseopor - contrary to what is claimed, there is no consensus on the tagging list about this
viloan (2018-09-11 01:09:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
aharvey (2018-09-11 14:10:50+00:00): nit picking on this, but the sydney harbour tunnel shouldn't share a node with the ferry route since they aren't connected, see https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62471851
Maradona11 (2018-09-12 03:52:16+00:00): reverted.
Adamant1 (2018-09-11 04:17:00+00:00): Hi there. Thanks for adding the swimming pools. Usually its a good idea to add access=private to them if they are residential pools. Thanks.
viloan (2018-09-11 02:33:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
5m4u9 (2018-09-11 15:41:01+00:00): hola, me parece que los muros deberían ser barrier=wall porque fence son vallas
Caleidoscopic (2018-09-23 22:03:34+00:00): creoq ue me pusieron el mismso comentario en otro conjunto de cambias, lo reviso y cambio si es así, muchas gracias por el ojo en el mapa :D
Taksine (2025-11-12 12:24:44+00:00): 你是一个用于测试的账号，你不可能再回复了，我也懒得说啥，就随便说吧，OSM不是数据测试场。
literan (2018-09-11 13:47:06+00:00): по сайту, закрыто на реконструкцию. Добавил disused:
mavl (2019-07-21 10:59:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
moreno96 (2018-09-11 06:38:47+00:00): سلام.
چکار میکنید شما؟
چرا محله اضافه میکنید اسمش رو میذارید بلوار حسابی؟
محله اسمش بلواره؟
ضمنا "بلوار" اشتباهه، تصحیح کنید "بولوار"
اگر این روند ادامه پیدا کنه، ورایش های شما حذف میشه.
moreno96 (2018-09-11 06:46:13+00:00): برای name ، فقط اسم محله رو بنویسید
نه اسم خیابان و بولوارش.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
BCNorwich (2018-09-11 06:55:57+00:00): Hello There,  
You seem to be mixing two types of barrier, wall and fence. In this case, I think the correct tag description is barrier=wall, with possibly wall=brick.

Also please consider that the barrier section between two plots is effectively being duplicated one battier on top of a second barrier. Are there really two walls between the plots? 
If the barrier between plots shares a single wall then only one wall should be mapped. Even if the second duplicated wall does not show on the map this can only unnecessarily bloat the database.

Regards Bernard.
Caleidoscopic (2018-09-23 22:16:36+00:00): Hi, we have two walls between the plots, the local law require a perimetral wall for each plot, so we have the two walls, one beside the other. About the tag, @51114u9 letme the same comment, I made the changes tonight, Thank´s for the suggestions! Caleidoscopic
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Paul_012 (2020-03-22 17:55:27+00:00): Please don't create weird micro-triangles for road junctions which should be a simple node. This edit has been partially reverted.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
narceliodesa (2018-09-18 14:40:39+00:00): Olá Luiz, tudo bem? 
Nesse conjunto de alterações tu removeu o detalhamento da Praça do Riachinho. Por qual motivo a edição foi desfeita?
Luiz Michel (2018-09-19 05:07:03+00:00): Opa Narcélio, tudo bom e com você?
Eu removi porque queria marcar a área da praça como área verde e não estava conseguindo com as marcações. Achei que eram detalhamentos feitos pelo próprio OpenStreet, perdão. Não foi intencional, pensei que eu era o único a editar o mapa em Várzea Alegre
narceliodesa (2018-09-19 15:58:20+00:00): Olá Luiz, sempre que tiver uma dificuldade no mapeamento entre em contato  com a pessoa que realizou o mapeamento anterior. Sobre as áreas verdes, nem toda praça deve ser mapeada com essa tag, no caso da praça, que tu denominou de Praça do Riachinho ela é , em sua maioria, um calçadão com poucos pontos de área verde um campo de futebol e duas quadras menores. Tudo isso estava mapeado e tu acabou desfazendo as edições. Tu não conseguiu realizar as marcações na praça pois ela foi mapeada como uma relação, que é um modelo mais detalhado de mapeamento no OSM. Vou tentar reverter as edições dessa praça especificamente. No mais continue os trabalhos nessa região, precisamos de mais mapeadores no interior do estado. Atenciosamente, Narcélio
mavl (2019-07-21 11:00:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2025-11-12 15:35:48+00:00): This changeset was fully reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62493002 in about 7 years ago, this comment is just a note for new comer data reviewer that it was already been reverted.
jowilkin (2018-12-18 10:37:35+00:00): Hi Prabesh,

I came across your mapping of this area and just wondered if you'd reconsider your tagging of these areas as villages or hamlets instead of towns? Usually towns are very urbanised, and I noted after comparing the mapping with imagery, it looks more rural than urban. There's also quite a few 'town' points associated with each area of houses. 

What I'd usually do is outline the areas of houses using the area tool to create a polygon, tag this as a village, and then add a village point into the centre of the polygon.

This must have taken a lot of work to digitise, so I just want to help make sure it looks right for everyone who can end up using your data (including me!). So thank you so much for contributing to OSM - it's been a while also since I edited... and this has made me realise how much I miss mapping on OSM!

If you've got any questions, let me know. If i don't hear back from you in the next month or so, no problem - I may just raise this OSM to get an appropriate fix :) .

Thanks again!
prabesh chapagain (2018-12-18 12:26:51+00:00): I was supposed to place the point as the name of area, unfortunately I placed as village and town.
geow (2019-02-02 14:59:10+00:00): Hi prabesh, this looks like an import, was it discussed before the execution, as the guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines require?

I took a closer look at the data and found out that the location of the nodes originated from this source: https://data.humdata.org/dataset/settlements-in-nepal

The license of the data seems to be not compatible with the OpenStreetMap Open Database License, as the terms of use require „Compilation or creation of derivative works from these Materials is subject to the inclusion of credit to the source of the Materials used (which may or may not be OCHA)“: 
https://www.humanitarianresponse.info/e … /terms-use

In addition to the unclear license and the lack of discussion these nodes - due to missing classification of the sites - do not contribute any meaningful info to our database, 

If you agree, I would like to revert this CS.

Thanks 
geow
prabesh chapagain (2019-02-03 03:11:32+00:00): Sure.
geow (2019-02-03 17:57:18+00:00): Thanks Prabesh, this CS was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66882442

Regards
geow
SimonPoole (2018-09-11 05:59:14+00:00): Reverted in #62474882.

You are welcome to add useful information to OSM, but please do not spam the project.
Manoj Thapa (2018-10-26 10:59:08+00:00): Hi Prabesh,
Why are these town mapped with out any information? Many of the town are on forest.
prabesh chapagain (2018-10-26 15:00:02+00:00): I was trying to keep settlement name but due to some mistake these settlement was placed with town only.
geow (2018-10-28 11:12:00+00:00): Hi Prabesh, this looks like an import, was it discussed before the execution, as the guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines require?
geow (2018-10-28 11:21:06+00:00): Anyway, something went wrong and these nodes do not contribute any useful info to the OSM database. 

If you agree I would like to revert this CS.
geow (2018-10-29 08:54:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by changeset 63970095 where the changeset comment is: 
Nepal: revert of undiscussed import of place nodes in Nepal (missing name tags, unclear license situation, bad positional accuracy and incorrect classification, e.g. town in rural areas).
Ro Sun (2018-10-26 11:05:57+00:00): Hi Prabesh, I found you mapping many places tagged as place=locality and place=town randomly and without any names. Furthermore in OSM a town is defied at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dtown.
prabesh chapagain (2018-10-28 10:53:40+00:00): it was all settlement area name but unfortunately it was converted to town and village
geow (2018-10-28 11:20:40+00:00): Hi Prabesh, this looks like an import, was it discussed before the execution, as the guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines require?

Anyway, something went wrong and these nodes do not contribute any useful info to the OSM database. 

If you agree I would like to revert this CS.