piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:58:23+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
Please check it...
Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97566983
Tntdruid (2021-04-02 19:23:00+00:00): Meget smuk rundkørsel du har lavet :)
mikkolukas (2021-04-02 21:24:56+00:00): Hehe, tak. Har bare tegnet det som de allerede havde kreeret i virkeligheden :)
aDSAT (2021-05-04 18:14:09+00:00): Hello Non Zero Racing, 

Thank you for contributing to OSM! I noticed some of your edits near Kuala Lumpur unintentionally left some broken data so I wanted to let you know about a few things I discovered. When this complex junction was remodeled there were multiple crossing ways which were not connected together by shared nodes. There were also six turn restriction relations which were left with missing members. The validation function in ID editor can help highlight these issues before you upload, so I would recommend using it when making complex edits (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID#Validation). I found some KartaView (https://kartaview.org/details/2724186/1511/track-info) and Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Rba8vTgKQ4woou9RsTQnft) ground level imagery in this area, which could help show you what exists on the ground vs. whats just visible in Bing. 

Here is an OSM Wiki about editing restriction relations (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction) that I find very helpful when I am editing complex junctions that have existing turn restrictions. Thank you for contributing to OSM and let me know if you have any questions! 

Thanks,  
aDSAT
canfe (2021-01-18 08:48:10+00:00): Quel che voglio dire è che, secondo me, proprio perché è una frazione, la strada non ha toponomastica. e i numeri delle abitazioni non seguono uno schema rigido come quelli di una strada.
Cartelli ce ne sono o c'è solo quello di "borgata"?
Mazda05 (2021-01-15 15:16:51+00:00): в чём заключаются вандальные действия Mazda5?
Dino Michelini (2021-01-16 08:42:36+00:00): Ciao, hai cancellato il tag highway=path ed ora il sentiero non è più utilizzabile nella mappa. Per favore, correggi. Grazie
jodd (2021-08-23 20:05:18+00:00): Hallo Nmxosm,
du hast ja auf vielen Straßen in der Frankfurter Innenstadt die Höchstgeschwindigkeit von 50 auf 40 km/h herabgesetzt. Soweit so klar. Auf vielen dieser Straßen war/ist jedoch source:maxspeed=DE:urban getaggt. Müsste dieser tag dann nicht angepasst werden, zum Beispiel auf source:maxspeed=sign, wenn das entsprechende Verkehrszeichen da ist? DE:urban passt ja jetzt nicht mehr.
VG jodd
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:53:32+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
Please check it...
Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97567494
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-18 17:54:48+00:00): hello, 
I see some errors in your changeset.  Please check and correct.  A road tag has been changed to a bus platform.  I edited it again.  Can you check the entire map and correct the mistakes.

Thank you...
gileri (2021-01-20 15:58:36+00:00): Bonjour,

Ce chemin est-il réservé exclusivement aux vélos : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166384819

Je connais pas bien le coin, mais dans les autres parcs en général c'est partagé.

Merci :)

Éric
pbennnnnnnnnnn (2021-01-20 16:08:41+00:00): Oui, c'est partagé
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:53:01+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97568030
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:52:43+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97568115
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:52:22+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97568135
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:51:59+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97568178
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:51:45+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
Please check it...
Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97568189
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:51:24+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97568263
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:51:00+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97568395
dgitto (2021-01-15 15:27:01+00:00): Sul nodo mountain_pass di Portella Vento come mai hai aggiunto natural=wood? è voluto o è un errore?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood
RomettaAS (2021-01-15 15:31:45+00:00): Perchè è un'area di bosco in cui si fa poi spazio il piccolo Rifugio Portella Vento, ma per la descrizione dell'ambiente naturale mi sembrava più adatto
dgitto (2021-01-15 16:29:05+00:00): Certo ma quel tag normalmente si usa sulle aree, non su singoli nodi (nella mappa su openstreetmap.com sono rese in colore verde).
Cmq no problem. Buon mapping
Jose Riha (2021-08-03 07:31:48+00:00): preco pri editacii nepouzivate podklady Ortofotomozaiky? je ovela presnejsia a aktualnejsia ako Bing. diky, j
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:50:38+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97568660
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:50:28+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97568698
Tomas Straupis (2021-01-15 17:28:54+00:00): Laba diena, ačiū už pakeitimus.
O švaros brolių čia nebėra?
Aurimas Kriauza (2021-01-15 17:57:13+00:00): Jau trys metai čia ML Auto arba Meninis Lyginimas.
Tomas Straupis (2021-01-15 19:01:12+00:00): Supratau, ačiū!
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:50:14+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97568738
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:49:56+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97568932
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:49:44+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97569024
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:49:32+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97569054
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:49:19+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97569092
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:49:04+00:00): Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97569181
gileri (2021-01-19 18:02:31+00:00): Bonjour, il y a bien un gué ici ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22940498

Je vois pas de cours d'eau, et en général ce tag est appliqué sur une section courte, peut-être s'agit-il d'une erreur ?
pbennnnnnnnnnn (2021-01-20 08:00:45+00:00): Bonjour, il n'y a pas de gué ni de riviere à cet endroit, il faudrait enlever ce tag.
gileri (2021-01-20 08:04:54+00:00): Ok merci je l'ai fait ici :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97819221
Morten Lange (2021-04-05 20:29:30+00:00): Það er nokkuð grænt in á milli  á Fagradalsfjalli.  Mér finnst eiginlega að natural=moss  sé meira í áttina en bare rock.  Helst ætti þetta að vera sparse_moss en hefur ekki verið notað. Moss hefur verið í láglendi á Íslandi. 
Sjá einnig: https://nordregio.org/maps/land-cover-in-the-arctic/
og 
https://land.copernicus.eu/user-corner/technical-library/corine-land-cover-nomenclature-guidelines/html/index-clc-333.html
natural=tundra gefur einnig hugmynd um mun "meiri lif".
Cartographer10 (2021-01-15 17:11:23+00:00): Hallo Brul,

Je hebt een aantal overbodige tags toegevoegd aan het pad. Een highway=footway impliceerd foot=designated, bicycle=no, horse=no, vehicle=no. Kijk maar eens op onderstaande wiki [1]. De tags foot, bicycle, horse en vehicle kunnen dus van dit pad af. Het is trouwens een voetpad dus de tag foot=yes is helemaal overbodig. 

Mvg,
Vincent

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Netherlands
Brul (2021-01-16 12:15:02+00:00): Het is overigensd een zeer smal zandig  boslooppaadje en eigenlijk ook geen highway etc. Een track is zelfs te breed. Als je een betere duiding hebt: wees welkom.
Nic727 (2021-03-26 02:16:36+00:00): Hi,

Reykjanes Peninsula actually cover a bigger area. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Peninsula_(Iceland)#/media/File:Reykjanes_Sudurnes.png

Thank you :)
Nic727 (2021-03-26 02:17:41+00:00): Nevermind...
Nic727 (2021-03-26 02:22:07+00:00): Actually, I don't really understand, what's the difference between https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9679978#map=10/63.9414/-22.2542 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4002388#map=10/63.9418/-22.2337

They are both related to Reykjanes peninsula... 

Can we also add an alternative name for "Reykjanes Peninsula" instead of Southern Peninsula or Reykjanes alone? A lot of people searching on the web are using Reykjanes Peninsula.

I also don't know why searching for Reykjanes Peninsula bring me in this area. https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Reykjanes%20Peninsula#map=12/63.8266/-22.6837
Nic727 (2021-03-26 02:37:02+00:00): Ok, sorry to have written stupid thing, I did my research and you are right. So many things are named Reykjanes in that area. Actually, I added alternative EN Reykjanes Peninsula to Reykjanesskagi.

Have a good day. You did a good job.
gileri (2021-01-19 15:29:23+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a une piste cyclable et des places de stationnement, les deux sont délimités par des lignes de peintures, il me semble qu'il y a donc 1 voie et pas "0" :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lane_markings
gileri (2021-01-19 15:32:52+00:00): Oups je me suis trompé de changeset, je voulais commenter celui-ci :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97571376
user_1566574 (2021-12-11 22:24:05+00:00): Salut !
Pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/895613367, tunnel=yes + layer=-1 n'est pas nécessaire si la voie n'est pas souterraine, un simple covered=yes (ou dans certains cas tunnel=building_passage) fait amplement le job !

Merci ! :)
gileri (2021-01-19 15:32:32+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a une piste cyclable et des places de stationnement, les deux sont délimités par des lignes de peintures, il me semble qu'il y a donc 1 voie et pas "0" :

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lane_markings
Mevess (2021-01-19 16:11:16+00:00): Bonjour,
En effet les places et la piste cyclables sont marquées, mais pour StreetComplete, une route à sens unique n'a par définition pas plusieurs voies (Sur l’icône de la route "sans voies peintes", on trouve des lignes blanches délimitant la route). Les lignes de peintures des pistes cyclables sont demandées indépendamment, avec une quête spécifique. Pour le reste je me demande si les places de parking doivent vraiment être comprises comme des voies, StreetComplete ne demande jamais si une chaussée contient des parkings, il faut d'abord créer une zone de parking, puis indiquer qu'elle se situe sur la chaussée.
gileri (2021-01-19 16:57:04+00:00): Cette réponse "pas de voies" permet d'indiquer lorsqu'il n'y a pas de délimitation de voies, comme souvent en campagne.

L'icône est un peu trompeuse, la caractéristique des voies peintes n'est pas le fait qu'il y ait une ligne continue, mais une ligne simplement :

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signalisation_routi%C3%A8re_horizontale_en_France#Typologie_des_lignes_discontinues

Une voie à sens unique bordée de deux voies cyclables a bien 1 voie pour automobile marquée. Ici c'est similaire avec la délimitation stationnement parallèle d'un côté, piste cyclable de l'autre.
BCNorwich (2021-01-15 17:24:56+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I looked at your addition of motor_vehicle=no to most of Fairmead Road and wonder how the two car parks near the middle of that road are accessed. Are they also closed to vehicles?

Regards Bernard.
jpwli (2021-01-15 21:00:37+00:00): Hi, the car parks are inaccessible to public motor vehicles, but Ieft them alone because I am not sure if they even exist at all anymore and have yet to check them out in person. The most recent streetlevel images of Fairmead Road (to my knowledge) are from August 2012, and that was before Fairmead Road had closed to motor traffic, so this is unusable. I will be visiting the road again tomorrow to check where the car parks are supposed to be, and whether or not they still actually exist. If they exist, I will just tag them as inaccessible to motor vehicles, as I already have done with the majority of Fairmead Road. Apologies for any confusion.

- jpwli
BCNorwich (2021-01-16 08:27:54+00:00): Hi, Thanks for your informative reply. It would be really good to have the car parks checked and amended.

Regards Bernard.
jmapb (2021-02-02 20:25:13+00:00): I'm a little puzzled here... 

I surveyed in January and the southbound signage here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3351031683) sent bicycles along the sidewalk (paved with blacktop with painted bike markings) and pedestrians along the edge of the pier (see https://i.imgur.com/Qe9YeZj.jpg). The westbound signage here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3351053358) said please walk bikes. And westbound from here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2342949845) the path still had bike markings on the pavement, as if the greenway continued toward the pier, with no indication that the northbound sidewalk is anything but a sidewalk. 

The only way I could make sense of this is if the greenway had been offically relocated onto the sidewalk but bikes were still allowed on the path along the pier edge. But now it doesn't add up at all.

Maybe it was a temporary detour? But the signage in the picture doesn't look temporary.
TheBestIdea (2021-02-02 23:25:17+00:00): Hey jmapb,

Sorry for the confusion. In my zeal to revert bikes being allowed on the paths at the edges of all 4 piers, I think I was too fast to change your edit about the bike path following the sidewalk on bridge park drive. 

I think that you are right that the bike path has been relocated to way 685538890. Your photo is very clear. And I also see the sidewalk in the process of being redone in asphalt in July 2019 street view imagery: https://goo.gl/maps/YDsvnNBvvjvHZkRe9
And looking at the Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta) in iD (which I think is the most recent) I can just make out bike stamps along the way. 

My guess is that the pavement bike markings at node 2342949845 is just a matter of NYCDOT not coordinating with the Brooklyn Bridge Park Conservancy. 

Unless you think differently, I would put things back as you had it with way 685538890 as a cycleway and way 894369891 as a footway.
jmapb (2021-02-03 00:13:52+00:00): I believe you're right about Maxar being the newest around here -- it's the only one that shows the Quay Tower complete (which I still need to add.)

I guess you can go ahead and put the greenway back but the way I had it, but I'm still unsure about the path west from node 2342949845 -- I can't find a picture but I recall it looking very much like a bike path, with its own cycle markings. But now it seems it would be a dead end. Maybe you can still bike to the ferry terminal?
TheBestIdea (2021-02-03 00:25:00+00:00): Access to ferry terminal would make sense. Maybe I'll make the path from node 2342949845 to the ferry as:
highway=path
foot=yes
and leave the bicycle access undefined for the moment?
jmapb (2021-02-03 02:09:16+00:00): Sounds good, I'll give it another peek when the snow melts
jmapb (2021-03-08 16:22:21+00:00): So... although https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/903220983 is clearly signed as a bike route with a greenway emblem, the cycleway paint on the the asphalt sidewalk (sideride?) has improved so a northbound cyclist *might* consider turning right on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685538890 instead of heading towards the ferry terminal. I still think this is a matter of signage not keeping up with the reroute. Not sure if any retagging is warranted at this time.

See https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/QmcLS8Np3giwWmgMKZxEifacn6bC9ZKJUCq1UPusd3NdMc and https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipfs/QmRdoTTokKSGG2bgN2Y28whn8aa4RC6n62AeBok7Geetbe
jmapb (2021-03-08 16:25:11+00:00): (those pictures taken at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/40.69188/-74.00069 looking NW)
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-16 13:22:01+00:00): Hi mojoridin, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several parts of the golf course which has been mapped by a different contributor just. few months before? Thanks.

Full changeset information:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=97571930#15/-38.0714/145.2821

#GolfMapping
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
eggie (2021-01-15 16:43:04+00:00): Culvert op de juiste  plek en met de beek  sch.. Lijkt mij helemaal oke. 
Gr eggie
Edmundus (2021-01-15 18:08:55+00:00): Goede avond,
Dank voor het commentaar. Nog een vraag: ongeveer 110 meter WNW t.o.v. De Gaarde 341 is de Zelhemsche beek enkele tientallen meters onderbroken als op de twee hoogste niveaus is ingezoomd. Met CTRL-F5 krijg ik dat niet goed. Maar in JOSM ziet het er gewoon goed uit. Heb jij een verklaring?
Met vriendelijke groet, Eddy.
eggie (2021-01-15 18:15:03+00:00): Zal even kijken..maar naast je eigen cache leegmaken ctrl f5 hebben we ook last van trage rendering momenteel. Soms helpt in- en uitzoomen.
eggie (2021-01-15 18:18:02+00:00): Zoom maar eens uit.. Dan zie je dat het oke is. :)
Elk zoomniveau heeft z'n eigen rendertijd nodig.
gr eggie
impiaaa (2021-01-15 16:26:47+00:00): This reverts changesets 97551909 97552220 97552821 97553116 97553242 97553490 97554249 97554456 97555647 97555913 97556693 97558201
SomeoneElse (2021-01-15 17:11:10+00:00): Thanks for fixing these.
There were a number of other issues as well, which I reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97573948 .
Best Regards,
Andy
abakus_uploader (2021-01-15 23:32:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2021-01-15 16:44:12+00:00): Volgens mij klopt het als een bus
gr eggie
eggie (2021-01-15 16:46:57+00:00): Hoewel...   Volgens PDOK is ook Beek met een hoofdletter.
Gr eggie
Heinz_V (2021-01-17 07:26:10+00:00): Why do you map a boundary way as a tunnel? Please restore the boundary.
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:22:13+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
Please check it...
Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97572864
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-15 17:21:16+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
Please check it...
Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97572997
mgpx (2021-01-19 22:03:15+00:00): A Börzsöny Sörözőn korábban szerepelt a megszűnt jelzés (abandoned:amenity=pub), emellé most működőként is megjelölted (amenity=pub). Nyilván nem lehet a söröző egyszerre üzemelő és megszűnt is, mindenképpen hibás a jelölés. De melyik a tényleges állapot ?
pio2_122 (2021-01-15 17:46:02+00:00): Obawiam się, że przypisanie adresu do obszaru kąpieliska może powodować trochę problemów.
Szczególnie dla nawigacji (nie wiem, czy wszystkie będą w stanie obliczyć środek tego obszaru i nie będą prowadziły do najbliższego boku, itp.).
Może też wyskoczyć "brakujący adres" na stronie budynki.openstreetmap.org.pl (ponieważ środek tego obszaru [zakładając, że jest w miejscu ikonki na OSM] jest oddalony ok. 80 metrów (wg moich pomiarów JOSM'em) od miejsca w ewidencji urzędowej.
W związku z tym, może jednak przywrócić adres na budynek (przy wejściu? - z góry zaznaczam, że tam nigdy nie byłem :P) od strony ul. Ujejskiego?
Endres Pelka (2021-01-15 22:28:09+00:00): Dzięki za uwagę. Na mapie urzędowej punkt adresowy znajduje się w miejscu, gdzie altana z kasą biletową stała przed wielkim remontem. OK, poprawiam: dam ten adres na aktualną kasę biletową.
pio2_122 (2021-01-16 14:02:16+00:00): Super! Dzięki za poprawkę :)

Swoją drogą, naprawdę porządna edycja. Szczególnie podoba mi się dokładność w przypadku okrągłych obiektów, czy idealne odrysowywanie obrysów budynków :D
Buraddo (2021-01-16 20:51:06+00:00): Salut, mă bucur că ai făcut primul tău edit pe OSM, baftă în continuare și la cât mai multe altele.
Ca o sugestie pentru editările viitoare, adăugarea unui obiect doar prin descriere nu este o practică tocmai corectă. Am adăugat niște completări clopotului pentru a putea fi interpretat corect. Te rog folosește preseturile din iD sau caută pe OSM wiki despre metoda corectă de tagging (spre exemplu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling).
ma-rt-in (2021-01-15 18:43:51+00:00): Hallo,
+habe mal das ganze noch etwas besser erfasst.
mfg
Cartographer10 (2021-01-16 08:37:21+00:00): Hallo Brul,

Zou je ook hier nog even naar al die overbodige access tags kunnen kijken zoals op mijn eerdere opmerking? Er kunnen er een aantal weg.

Mvg,
Vincent
Brul (2021-01-16 12:09:02+00:00): Beste Vincent, ik zit niet de hele tijd op openstreetmaps te editen ook niet in coronatijd. Vandaar dat het even kan duren voordat ik reageer.
Je wilt niet weten hoeveel buitenlandse gebruikers van onze wandelpaden menen  dat ze er mogen fietsen, paardrijden e.d. Door het expliciet te vermelden wil ik dat betreffende internationale (!) apps dergelijke dingen op onze paden niet in hun routeplanner opnemen.
Cartographer10 (2021-01-16 13:03:18+00:00): Even los van de tagging, Ik zie maar 1 ingang van het gebied, rechts bij het gebouw.  Gebruiken mensen navigatie apps om in jullie gebied te navigeren?

Dat ter zijde. Het is geloof ik toegestaan om soms de access expliciet nader aan te geven voor de duidelijk. Als het echt alleen voor voetgangers is dan lijkt mij highway=footway het beste omdat dat vanuit zich zelf ook het beste aangeeft wat het gebruik is (voetgangers). Je hebt ook highway=path als algemene aanduiding van een pad. path zou je bijvoorbeeld kunnen gebruiken bij een algemeen bospad waar geen voertuigen overheen passen (want dan is het highway=track) maar dat lijkt mij hier niet het geval. Laat highway=footway dan maar staan. Wel zou ik foot=yes en vehicle=no weg halen. Die twee zijn hier echt overbodig. Overigens, je zou ook nog een width=* kunnen aangeven op het pad. 

Mvg,
Vincent
Brul (2021-01-19 16:40:59+00:00): Ik heb eea aangepast. Vreemd genoeg is deze Weg: 895612318 op openstreetmaps.org vanaf een bepaald INzoom nivo niet meer zichtbaar, maar op de standaardkaart wel op de cyclOSM. Hoe kan dat ? In de bewerkingsmodus blijft de weg zichtbaar. 
Mvg
Martien