piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-03-09 13:04:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Gh0stz0x (2018-03-15 20:02:42+00:00): Benvenuto su OpenStreetMap.
Il nome della via deve essere messo per esteso, niente abbreviazioni.
Grazie
Girgenti (2018-03-15 21:02:06+00:00): Sono desolato ma devo contestare il rilievo mosso poiché l'Unità Organizzativa Toponomastica del Comune di Palermo, non avendo recepito gli standard nazionali, da diversi anni assegna alle strade comunali di nuova realizzazione nomi abbreviati, aggiungerei, per pigrizia. Può facilmente consultare lo Stradario Ufficiale del Comune, anche se non aggiornato, e verificare quanto da me affermato. Attendo un suo riscontro. Grazie.
Gh0stz0x (2018-03-16 10:31:59+00:00): Buongiorno,
questa non è l'Unità Organizzativa Toponomastica del Comune di Palermo, è OpenStreetMap e per convenzione il nome delle vie va scritto per esteso. Come da wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

...omissis
Abbreviation (don't do it)
If the name can be spelled without an abbreviation, then don't abbreviate it. Computers can easily shorten words, but not the other way (St. could be Street or Saint). If the signs have abbreviated words and you don't know what the full word is, then use it temporarily until someone else completes it. Using short forms is a decision of software, i.e., the underlying data should have the full street name. This will allow a renderer, a router or a location finder to introduce abbreviations as necessary. See, for instance, the list of abbreviations used by Name Finder and Nominatim.

Use mixed case with the first letter of each word capitalised, e.g., Church Street, not Church street. Note: Regional rules have preference over general rules. For example, in Flemish, capitalisation of last names gives a hint about the nobility status of the person. Street or company names derived from those last names should copy the same capitalisation. In non-Latin based languages, it's often not even possible to capitalise a name.

If the name is incorrect when spelled in full, however, do not falsely expand it. (For example: Wilts & Berks Canal, British placenames beginning with "St".)

Apart from following the above rules, you should always enter the full name as it appears on the street name signs.

Be aware that street signs may contain errors.

Watch out for apostrophes. The same rule applies. If the street sign has an apostrophe, the OSM data should have an apostrophe. There is no obvious consistency; the London Underground station Barons Court is adjacent to Earl's Court, one with an apostrophe, one without.
....omissis...

Spero di aver chiarito il motivo della mia richiesta.
Rimango a disposizione.
Girgenti (2018-03-16 12:02:16+00:00): Grazie per il riscontro provvedo ad operare l'opportuna rettifica secondo il regolamento.
viloan (2018-03-09 13:05:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Hjart (2018-03-09 14:17:34+00:00): Changing the width tag would probably be a good idea then
locke (2018-03-10 19:36:36+00:00): That is right. But I do not know the width exactly enough.
I know there are different opinions wether tertiary or unclassified "fits" better. Following the wiki narrow roads where cars cannot pass without reducing speed might distinguish unclassified from tertiary.
Please feel free to revert, I don't mind. Maybe you can tell me the reason then.
Hjart (2018-03-10 20:35:35+00:00): I did measure the width somewhere at the western end by drawing a way across the road in JOSM and simply seeing the length of that way. With some experience it's fairly easy to estimate the width of roads that way. It won't ever be super accurate, but still good enough for most uses.
I now realize that the part running through the forest is only ~3.5 m and that unclassified probably fits better then, so it would probably be good to change the width tag too
locke (2018-03-10 21:45:52+00:00): Thank you. Already changed width
glglgl (2018-03-12 08:35:07+00:00): Das war Unsinn. Gemeint war "Sengscheid und Reichenbrunn".
Geofreund1 (2021-04-01 09:34:21+00:00): place=farm sollte gemäß wiki 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dfarm

in diesem Fall nicht verwendet werden. Die Anmerkung fehlt allerdings in der DE Fassung.
Bitte mal prüfen.
PT-53 (2021-04-01 12:24:43+00:00): Und warum nicht ?
Geofreund1 (2021-04-01 15:45:36+00:00): Natürlich sind das alles keine Gesetze sondern nur Vereinbarungen bzw. Empfehlungen. Keiner wird dich zwingen, sich daran zu halten. Aber das Thema scheint mir wichtig und ich werde es mal öffentlich machen.
PT-53 (2021-04-01 15:56:51+00:00): Ich weiß jetzt aber immer noch nicht, warum in diesem Fall place=farm nicht verwendet werden soll.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:18:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
ToeBeeFixit (2018-03-24 04:21:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 57455115, 57473372, 57444133, 57466192 where the changeset comment is: Reverting mass node movement changesets
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:27:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
ToeBeeFixit (2018-03-24 04:21:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 57455115, 57473372, 57444133, 57466192 where the changeset comment is: Reverting mass node movement changesets
ToeBee (2018-03-21 20:19:07+00:00): This changeset moved a massive number of nodes across a wide area exactly 1.79 meters to the northwest. It seems likely that this is some kind of mistake and seems to have negatively impacted the geometry of several objects. What was your intention with this changeset? Your changeset comment doesn't help me understand your intentions. You have at least 3 other changesets with similar changes in them recently. There has been a request made to revert these move operations. Unless you have a good explanation for these changes, I am inclined to agree with the request to revert.

Toby,  
On behalf of the Data Working Group
geoaria (2018-03-22 04:51:55+00:00): Hello
Yes, these changes were made wrong, and I decided to return them after the trip.
if possible, you can return those changes.
Thanks
geoaria (2018-03-22 10:46:11+00:00): Changes returned
stephankn (2018-03-12 00:25:00+00:00): roads ragged with temporary type highway=road. Shouldn't they be highway=unclassified as they connect villages? way 568266427
way 568266426
way 568263878
eggie (2018-03-09 14:38:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-09 14:41:29+00:00): ...of bedoel je wellicht historic?
eggie (2018-03-09 14:46:38+00:00): Tip: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic
bartvalom (2018-03-09 19:07:32+00:00): Idd beter: raadhuisjes zijn gebouwd als 'civic buildings', maar hebben nu vnl historisch belang. Ik zal het wijzigen.
viloan (2018-03-09 14:12:23+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ToeBeeFixit (2018-03-24 04:21:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 57455115, 57473372, 57444133, 57466192 where the changeset comment is: Reverting mass node movement changesets
demon_box (2018-03-10 22:23:28+00:00): ciao, su questo oggetto
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/566308868
non è corretto mettere name=Piazze sul landuse=meadow
meglio mettere un nodo place=locality con name=Piazze
CAI Salò (2018-03-11 09:48:36+00:00): ok
stephankn (2018-03-12 00:22:44+00:00): What happened here? A (service?) road leading to the temple tagged as tertiary, nearby highway=road. eg way 568301907

Are you going to revisit that tagging?
DD1GJ (2018-03-09 20:32:17+00:00): Hallo Varrom, da Deine "Parks" erneut sehr zweifelhaft waren, habe ich Deine Änderungen komplett zurückgesetzt.
demon_box (2018-03-10 22:24:39+00:00): ciao, questa
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568287485
che tipo di recinzione è?
demon_box (2018-03-10 22:25:17+00:00): ...e anche questa?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568287484
CAI Salò (2018-03-11 09:50:46+00:00): questa è una barriera in legno (staccionata)per deviare il traffico pedonale, ai bordi della proprietà. Abbiamo dovuto modificare il percorso perché il proprietario non vuole intrusi.
demon_box (2018-03-11 13:40:09+00:00): Allora ci va
fence_type=pole
material=wood
leggi qui
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:fence_type
literan (2018-03-10 12:31:14+00:00): аккуратнее, пожалуйста. Посмотрите, вы сегмент Волоколамского шоссе на полкилометра в сторону утащили https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=57034588
demon_box (2018-03-10 22:32:44+00:00): ciao, non avevi messo il landuse=meadow
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568288911/
membro inner del multipligono landuse=forest
CAI Salò (2018-03-11 09:51:46+00:00): ok
demon_box (2018-03-10 22:44:00+00:00): ciao,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568293278
non l'hai messo membro inner del multipoligono landuse=forest
CAI Salò (2018-03-11 09:56:19+00:00): ok
demon_box (2018-03-10 22:20:55+00:00): ciao, il tag corretto è
source:date
non date
demon_box (2018-03-10 22:26:33+00:00): ...l'oggetto in questione ovviamente è questo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5467569123
già sistemato
maraf24 (2018-03-11 21:37:23+00:00): Dzięki:)
To dlatego, że droga była przyklejona do granicy osiedla.
Robin007 (2018-03-12 13:42:50+00:00): Nie ma sprawy :)
DaveF (2018-03-12 01:40:54+00:00): Hi
Was this block amendment discussed anywhere?
Robert Whittaker (2018-03-12 08:27:03+00:00): No -- do you think it should have been?

I'm not sure exactly what your concerns are, but (a) the use of the DfE data for UK Schools is well-established, and (b) I wouldn't regard the changeset as a mechanical edit as each change was examined individually before being included in the changeset.

The changes were made based on official data from https://get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/ that said a school with a now-definct ID had a successor institution with the new ID. I used the data extracted by my tool in the table at
http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/schools/matching-queries.html#no-ref-successor
to manually check that the school still had essentially the same name, and was in roughly the correct location. For such objects, I concluded the ID change was just administrative, and so could be updated safely. Given the nature of the changes (updating the ID and in some cases changing the name to the official name supplied by the school to the DfE) I felt this was sufficient verification for each change. (The currently remaining entries in the table above are the ones I rejected in my initial pass as needing a fuller investigation before making any changes. I haven't got round to looking into those yet.)
DaveF (2018-03-12 08:54:48+00:00): My concern is the name change. Similar to road & shop names, the one on the ground should be used. In databases they're often manipulated to suit the needs of the compiler.

A heads-up on Talk-GB would have been nice.
DaveF (2018-03-13 13:20:27+00:00): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-March/021236.html
saintam1 (2018-03-09 22:23:14+00:00): Hello, in Bulgaria the convention is that we don't put the "ул." prefix on street names, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#.D0.98.D0.BC.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B0_.D0.BD.D0.B0_.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B8.D1.86.D0.B8_.D0.B8_.D0.B1.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B5.D0.B2.D0.B0.D1.80.D0.B4.D0.B8 and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=19819.
ngvirus (2018-03-10 04:11:20+00:00): Hello, the name is 'ул. Самоков', but the english name should be 'Samokov str.'
user_5359 (2018-03-11 20:14:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
johsin18 (2018-03-11 10:14:33+00:00): What kind of attraction is at this place? Kind?
 Name? Or was this an accidental change?
Dzertanoj (2018-03-09 19:54:52+00:00): Ну и зачем вы половину Московской области водой залили тегами вот этого отношения http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3375993/ ?
Править гигантские отношения в iD - прямой путь к ошибкам.
Alexander-II (2018-03-10 06:58:00+00:00): Откатил изменения, которые касались упомянутого отношения.
viloan (2018-03-09 15:41:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
KanaLee (2018-03-09 15:52:22+00:00): Oops auto-fill on mobile. Disregard U-turn bit.
majkaz (2018-03-09 16:49:10+00:00): Ahoj,
není "abandoned" minimálně u té cesty 258304210, tedy u té v Českých Budějovicích trochu ... no ... optimistické označení? To by mělo znamenat, že se nějak ta trasa dá poznat na místě. Podle mého ale ta trať komplet zmizela, nedá se už poznat ani na Vrbenských rybnících, pokud nebereš že ta cesta tam odpovídá bývalé trati.
NaLaNo (2018-03-09 18:27:29+00:00): Koleje tam dávno nejsou, původní těleso tratě je většinou jasně zřetelné, většinu trasy vede po náspu cesta. Jsou zachovalé mostky a propustě. Např. zobrazení openrailwaymap.org jsou zobrazené opuštěné tratě i projektované tratě, které v terénu mají mnohem méně stop. Myslíš, že tomu chybí nějaký atribut, který by určoval míru opuštěnosti?
NaLaNo (2018-03-19 20:47:37+00:00): Doplním provedenou opravu: Mezi rybníky u Vrbné jsou náspy - nechal jsem atribut Abandoned. V sídlišti Vltava je atribut Razed.
Alexander-II (2018-03-10 11:11:48+00:00): Насколько временное? Откатывать уже можно? А когда можно будет?
literan (2018-03-10 12:24:40+00:00): vetven_narost, использовать в качестве источника данных другие карты запрещено по правилам проекта, если только у вас нет прямого разрешения от правообладателя. У вас оно есть?
Alexander-II (2018-03-10 15:12:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568305770/history "Родниковый ручей" — это действительно название ручья? Или это обозначение с топографической карты, что этот ручей, течет из родника?
vetven_narost (2018-03-13 07:05:10+00:00): Alexander-II, я откатил только что:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57135044
Родниковый ручей - аутентичное название, см.:
http://logoworks.narod.ru/moscow/uspage.html
vetven_narost (2018-03-13 07:07:02+00:00): literan, да, у меня есть как сама карта для спортивного ориентирования, присланная мне ее правообладателем, так и его личное прямое согласие на использование этой его карты для редактирования в OpenStreetMap.
literan (2018-03-13 08:27:36+00:00): vetven_narost, а вы можете мне сказать имя-фамилию рисовщика карты? я знаком с несколькими авторами карт в Московском регионе.
vetven_narost (2018-03-13 11:36:54+00:00): literan, конечно. Сейчас напишу вам в личку.
Glassman (2018-03-09 23:44:12+00:00): Can you give it the correct name for the mobile home park?
mueschel (2018-03-10 13:39:47+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Please don't upload such private data to the OSM database. This information seems to be for your local organization but is of no use for other users.
See here for more comments: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56576898

Jan
luschi (2019-03-14 17:37:21+00:00): Hallo FF Girlan,

du hast vor einiger Zeit Hydranten eingezeichnet und einige als "Überflur-Art = Nass" eingetragen.     
Mit der Überflur-Art wird beschrieben ob der Hydrant bis oben hin immer mit Wasser gefüllt ist oder nicht.     
Wenn du "Nass" auswählst heißt das so viel wie: Der Hydrant ist bis oben hin immer mit Wasser gefüllt und kann so im Winter gefrieren und würde somit kaputt gehen.     
Wenn du "Trocken" auswählst, heißt das, dass der Hydrant tiefer in der Erde das Ventil zum verriegeln hat und so nicht direkt bis oben hin mit Wasser gefüllt ist. Dieser Hydrant friert dann im Winter nicht ein oder platzt.

In Südtirol, sowie in allen Zonen wo es kalt wird, sollten eigentlich "Trockene" Hydranten in Verwendung sein.     
"Trockene" Hydranten sind leicht daran zu erkennen, da sie oben auf dem Hydrant ein einzelner Absperrhahn ist.     
"Nasse" Hydranten haben für jeden Anschluss einen eigenen Absperrhahn.

Kannst du das bitte noch einmal kontrollieren.     
Danke

lg     
luschi
Supaplex (2019-02-08 16:30:34+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
GerdP (2018-09-28 07:50:30+00:00): Hi!
What does highway=Lovington mean here?
abakus_uploader (2018-03-09 23:30:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Spanholz (2018-03-16 10:36:28+00:00): Was hast du probiert hier zu mappen?
TheDutchMan13 (2018-03-10 03:34:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. Changeset: 57049649
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:21:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
BCNorwich (2018-03-09 20:20:43+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've reinstated the main building so that when amended it keeps the history, this is as per OSM best practice.
If a feature has been mapped wrong, or it's outline or tagging/description has changed, it's best if the original mapping is amended rather than deleted, then the database keeps the history of the original mapper and all changes to the feature.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2018-03-09 20:29:41+00:00): Hi, in the absence of an intermittent tag the OSM database defaults to presuming the feature is not intermittent. Thus the tag intermittent=no is not necessary. In most cases negative tags are not needed and if added would only serve to bloat the database. 
Regards Bernard.