piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TeXnicer (2019-12-05 05:01:08+00:00): Bitte verifizieren:
O Grenze Gärtnergang/Holzreiterwall
O Verlauf Holzreiterwall durch den neuen Knick
O Status: alte Zufahrt (physisch vorhanden, derzeit gesperrt für den Kfz-Verkehr
O Grenze "Tückmantel-Siedlung"
O Vorfahrtsregelung Arndtstraße Holzreiterwall/Holzreiterwall quer?! Gärtnergang?
O Vorfahrtsstraßen-Ende Zeichen in Richtung Süden auf Höhe Spalingingstraße auf Gärtnergang
highflyer74 (2019-12-05 05:45:19+00:00): Moin!

Du hast hier Deinen eigenen CS kommentiert. Was möchtest Du damit erreichen? Soll es Dir als Gedächtnisstütze dienen, oder ist es als eine Bitte an andere Mapper gedacht?

Ich frage nur, weil ich vermute, dass es in beiden Fällen nicht der "richtige" Ort wäre. CS Kommentare dienen im Normalfall als Rückfragemöglichkeit anderer Mapper zu einem bestimmten Changeset.

Sollten Fehler in OSM vorhanden sein, ist es besser, eine OSM-Note zu erstellen. Die sehen andere dann auch.

Als Tipp generell, da hier relativ viel gelöscht wurde: wir versuchen Löschungen immer zu vermeiden und bevorzugen ein Umtaggen von Objekten so weit es geht. Auch sollte man sich beim Erfassen von temporären Zuständen wie Straßensperrungen auf die wirklich lange gesperrten (also mehrere Monate) beschränken.

Da ich in Deinem Blog auf eine Linksammlung gestossen bin, hier noch ein paar nützliche, falls Du die noch nicht kennst:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich gern!
phidauex (2019-12-05 03:02:35+00:00): Hi, this is the second guest house point you've added to this area. Is this a building that is available for rent? IE, are you sure it is a guest_house that should be displayed on the map?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77962872
user_5359 (2019-12-05 06:28:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short hint for https://www.osm.org/way/752852721 : 
Please check the meaning and values of building:levels: This is a building height not a education level)
Don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building
eggie (2023-10-22 06:44:14+00:00): Dag wvdp

Dit 'ziekenhuis' heb ik omgezet naar een huisartsenpraktijk,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2185611324
Ook de spelling aangepast.
MVG
eggie
Endres Pelka (2020-07-11 11:58:44+00:00): Dlaczego zamieniasz building:part na building, jak building już jest? Poprawiam.
What's the point changing building:part to building, when there's already an object with building tag? Fixing now.
mariotomo (2019-12-06 01:10:17+00:00): hola.  please don't demote unclassified to track in Panamá.
most unclassified roads here look like tracks, are hardly usable without a 4×4 truck, 8 months a year, but are really roads connecting communities.
you need to have been living here for a while, to appreciate the presence of a "hamlet" (comunidad), which seldom has the resemblance of anything organized.
so please do not demote unclassified to track, unless you have inspected the road personally.
VigotheCarpathian (2019-12-06 17:35:45+00:00): Hello Mario, thanks for the information regarding the road conditions. I will be sure to pass that information forward to our team.
gscholz (2019-12-10 05:45:06+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-60.28148&lat=-3.20906&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6
gscholz (2019-12-10 05:47:24+00:00): Hi greenmapper,
your recent changesets have left behind several errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

    http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-60.28148&lat=-3.20906&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?

Guido
A67-A67 (2019-12-05 01:23:36+00:00): Hallo Padvinder,
Waarom verwijder je deze waterwegen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/749831138
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/687857302
Deze zijn onderdeel van het watersysteem van de Zuidpolder van Delfgauw en waren correct getagd.

Daarnaast gaat deze watergang in een duiker onder de N470 door. Er is dus geen brug op deze plek: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752864159
A67-A67 (2019-12-05 01:29:47+00:00): Ik heb het hersteld.
A67-A67 (2019-12-05 01:31:23+00:00): Ook dit vlak: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752864242 is nu ingetekend als onderdeel van het weiland. Deze hoort d.m.v. een multipolygon worden getagd, waarbij het weiland de rol 'outer' krijgt en het paardenveld de rol 'inner'.
viloan (2019-12-05 01:08:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
wireguy (2019-12-05 15:04:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  good to see someone mapping bike trails in nj.  Keep up the mapping.
A67-A67 (2019-12-05 01:26:12+00:00): Bedankt voor het toevoegen van de details, maar je moet nieuwe vlakken wel uitsnijden uit de bestaande vlakken i.p.v. deze te laten overlappen.

Bijvoorbeeld bij dit stukje bos: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752864688
Dit gebied staat nu in OSM als een gebied dat zowel erf als bos is en een gebied dat zowel weiland als bos is.
aharvey (2019-12-05 01:57:35+00:00): ok thanks. I've added the old name back into the "old_name" key so people searching for the old name can still find it.
j1scad (2019-12-12 01:30:59+00:00): Die Tagesklinik befindet sich nur im östlichen Gebäude der Werner-Petzold-Str. 17. Könntest du vielleicht nochmal korrigieren.

Grüsse
L___I (2019-12-12 10:43:07+00:00): Hallo j1scad,
danke für Deine Mitteilung und den Hinweis. Ich habe dementsprechend eine Änderung vorgenommen, siehe Verweis zur grafischen Darstellung der Änderung unten[1]. Schaust Du bitte mal drüber, ob das so okay ist, oder ob jetzt immer noch zu viel "Vorgarten" erfasst ist. 
Danke und Grüsse
LI
[1] https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=78311842
naoliv (2019-12-06 21:04:16+00:00): Mauricio, tudo bem?
Talvez não seja necessário colocar "IFC-" em todos os prédios, já que todos estão dentro do IFC mesmo, certo?
Também é bom usar nomes que não sejam totalmente em maiúsculo. Por exemplo, usar apenas "Ferramentaria" como nome do prédio.

Uma coisa que está errada nos objetos é a chave "addr:place", que não deveria existir.

Todos os outros "addr:*" possivelmente podem ser removidos também; só precisa ter endereço o campus do instituto e não cada prédio individualmente.
Mauricio Ihlenfeldt (2019-12-09 12:54:31+00:00): Olá Naoliv,
Agradeço pelas dicas, concordo com o que disse e vou providenciar as correções.
Um outro colega já havia me alertado sobre algumas chaves, corrigi as que tinha certeza, mas ainda existem novas correções a serem feitas. Isto aconteceu pela importação dos arquivos de coordenadas do formato de desenho original que continha algumas chaves.
skquinn (2019-12-05 03:59:47+00:00): Please save your work before changing areas. Please tag your changesets with something more descriptive than "edit"; we already know it's an edit, so that tells us nothing useful.
A67-A67 (2019-12-05 01:41:30+00:00): Hallo Padvinder,
Je blijft overlappende vlakken toevoegen, zoals deze https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752866525
Dit water overlapt met het gras en het bos.
A67-A67 (2019-12-05 01:43:03+00:00): Dit bos overlapt met het gras: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752866525. Volgens de OSM-data is dit dus zowel gras als bos.
Hier hoort een multipolygon aangemaakt te worden.
user_5359 (2019-12-05 06:09:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You have added the tag "ford=yes" to the highway https://www.osm.org/way/107498753/history, but I can't see a stream being crossed (it's usually just a node or a short way). What did you want to communicate with this tag?
Rick McD (2019-12-05 16:16:26+00:00): First time contributor. I made an error. Thanks for correcting!
user_5359 (2019-12-05 17:31:22+00:00): No problem! You are welcome!
Kovoschiz (2019-12-05 04:01:36+00:00): This is no way a valid reason. You must be more convincing than this.
user_5359 (2019-12-05 05:56:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property. Also a tree is a forest, and inside of the US the name and name:en should be identical.
minghong (2019-12-11 09:56:33+00:00): Please stop removing places based on your personal preferences. This place can be found in government map:
https://www.map.gov.hk/gm/map/search/keyword/Ho%20Chung%20Valley
Philip Wan (2019-12-12 01:34:32+00:00): I didn't delete this place. I must have written the wrong comment.
minghong (2019-12-11 09:57:12+00:00): Please stop removing places based on your personal preferences. This place can be found in government map:
https://www.map.gov.hk/gm/map/search/keyword/TA%20KU%20LING#0
Philip Wan (2019-12-12 01:34:24+00:00): I didn't delete this place. I must have written the wrong comment.
Supaplex (2020-01-02 18:05:08+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
opseap (2019-12-08 20:33:00+00:00): Regis, quando eu fiz as gavetas esqueci de colocar o semáforo vermelho. Veja que no lado do Guarujá eu havia colocado.
azakh-world (2019-12-05 16:35:06+00:00): Hi.
Please return station=subway to Skytrain stations. Subway is defined by technical characteristics of transport, not under-/over-/onground location.

Best regards,
Alexey
skquinn (2019-12-05 04:20:35+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Please note that highway objects cannot overlap. This confuses software which uses the data and also throws warnings in editors like JOSM.
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-12-08 21:34:15+00:00): "National Road" is the most common name for the sections of Manila South Road/Maharlika Highway, so do not change that without discussing it.
apm-wa (2020-01-01 06:11:50+00:00): This is not a secondary road.  It is a dirt road paralleling the border with Afghanistan used only by the State Border Service of Turkmenistan to patrol the border.  It should not be marked as a secondary road; it should be marked as a restricted access service road.  Please make the appropriate edits.  Thank you for your help with the OSM map of Turkmenistan!
cartorhythm (2020-01-03 22:51:52+00:00): Thanks for making the edits for RasDashen. We will be aware of this information going forward.
lasagna (2019-12-05 21:55:28+00:00): I have not surveyed this area myself, but based on the available sources I believe that East Hughes Access Road is completely closed and unmaintained. The current combination of tags suggests that the road is open. To correct this, I propose to either:
1. Remove highway=unclassified, leaving disused:highway=unclassified
2. Remove disused:highway=unclassified and add access=no
dvvuyyur (2019-12-06 10:30:22+00:00): Hi lasagna,

Thanks for looking into my edit.Made the necessary changes as per the suggestions.Please refer the changeset (78042005) for the modification.Please let me know if anything needs to be added. Always happy to learn from community.
Regards,
dvvuyyur.
robinmetral (2025-02-21 06:59:50+00:00): This is not good practice. The node that was deleted was an older representation of the POI, and it should have been moved instead of copying its tags over to the newer node (which was a duplicate and should have been deleted).
robinmetral (2025-02-21 08:08:23+00:00): Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162768564
user_5359 (2019-12-05 05:36:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Alhamdulillah (2019-12-05 09:01:47+00:00): Please be more proud and explain your valuable work.
"#maproulette" is a useless changeset comment since it tells us absolutely nothing about the subject of mapping.
And please me forgive me to teach to somebody with ∞ more edits!
user_5359 (2019-12-05 05:35:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mavl (2019-12-05 16:08:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника были взяты адресные данные?
literan (2019-12-05 16:45:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10373775/history вот корректный мультиполигон, с вырезанными "дырками"
mavl (2019-12-05 16:03:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, почему изменены статусы дорог с highway=residential на highway=living_street?  
Например:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245020881/history
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Pikse (2020-01-11 11:21:44+00:00): Üsna arusaamatu muudatus. Teenindustee  (tüüp "service") või mahasõidu rada (link) keset suurt ristmikku või kahe sõidusuunda vahel? Arvatavasti tuleks tühistada.
user_5359 (2019-12-05 17:38:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
Warin61 (2019-12-05 07:29:44+00:00): The Malligawad Chinchali Road:
Not all of this road is a bridge... only those bits that have a bridge should be tagged that way. For the moment leave the bridges alone. 

From imagery .. part of this 'road' goes across farm fields .. it is little more than a path in those locations. I refer to around 15.2943741, 75.4792762

Keep mapping!
mavl (2020-02-21 16:46:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:46:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:46:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:46:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:46:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:46:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:46:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:46:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:46:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
mavl (2020-02-21 16:46:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
user_5359 (2019-12-05 10:50:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2019-12-05 10:48:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:healthcare  .
Wulf4096 (2019-12-05 19:17:09+00:00): Hallo!

Du hast wohl einen falschen Link eingetragen. Es fehlt u.a. das Protokoll. Aber auch mit geht da nichts.
Und wozu noch "contact:website:status=404 @ 2019-12-05"? Macht iD das, oder woher kommt der Müll?

Sollte die Telefonnummer nicht im internationalen Format sein? Und wen erreicht man dort, die Ladesäule? :-)
look4book (2019-12-05 21:39:34+00:00): Netiquette! Nicht in dem Ton.
look4book (2019-12-06 08:56:09+00:00): So - jetzt nochmal inhaltlich, und der Reihe nach. Den Link unter "contact:website" habe ich genau so der Beschriftung auf der Säule entnommen. Sprich: ohne Spezifikation von Protokoll oder Scheme Syntax. Der String war dann nicht als Link zu verifizieren, das hast Du auch gemerkt, weder mit http noch mit https. Was bleibt, als den Status zu dokumentieren?: 404. Ein "abandoned:website" wollte ich der neuen Ladestation dann doch nicht spendieren. Wer weiß - vielleicht geht es heute schon? ;-)
Zuletzt noch die Telefonnummer. Kenner identfizieren eine 0800 als kostenfreie Sondernummer, die im Gegenzug für die Kostenübernahme nur aus Deutschland zu erreichen ist. Also gerade nicht mit +49 davor.
Wulf4096 (2019-12-06 09:40:33+00:00): Sorry für den schlechten Ton; hatte mich gerade über iD aufgeregt, auch wenn der Editor wohl doch nichts damit zu tun hat.

Auch wenn Telefon/Webseite so 1:1 auf der Säule steht, sollte man in der Datenbank nach Standards arbeiten, hier z. B. rfc3986 für URIs und ITU-T E.123 für Telefonnummern. Ist besser für die Datenkonsumenten. Eine OSM-Anwendung könnte anhand der Nummer erkennen, dass sie kostenlos ist und dies dem Nutzer geeignet anzeigen. Oder die Nummer auch gerne in einem anderen Format anzeigen.

Ich würde die Webseite schlicht weglassen, wenn's eh nicht funktioniert. keepright und konsorten werden die nicht erreichbare Seite wohl auch demnächst anmeckern.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact beschreibt das Format für Telefonnummern; das wäre hier "+49 800 8888820"
Auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone wird auch "phone:DE=0800...." zugelassen, aber ich weiß nicht, ob/wie sich das auf "contact:phone" übersetzen lässt. "contact:DE:phone"? Ist leider nicht dokumentiert. Und wenn ich die "+49800..." in meinem Telefon eingebe, gehen auch die Stadtwerke ran.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website beschreibt das Format für URIs auch nochmal. "Include the scheme".

Auf https://osm.org/node/1311002151 kann man die Links für Telefon+Website klicken, auf https://osm.org/6991776637 nicht.
Wulf4096 (2019-12-06 09:42:37+00:00): Letzter Link kaputt. Sollte https://osm.org/node/6991776637 sein.
Mannyy (2020-07-26 12:00:16+00:00): Hi silverbullet, hier hattest du in place=neighbourhood geändert.Dazu gehört dann auch ein Name (Fehler: place ohne Name). Eine ursprünglicher Schlüssel  landuse=residential ist ja meiner Meinung ja auch zutreffend.
Gruß Mannyy
Alan (2020-07-24 18:31:15+00:00): Hi there, thank you for creating a polygon for Coney Island, but I think we _also_ need to have it as a node for labeling purposes. See for example Bath Beach and Gravesend, which each have both. You can also combine the node and the boundary together in a relation, like most of the Manhattan neighborhoods have: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8398117
MxxCon (2020-07-24 18:40:03+00:00): Can that be done with iD or would I need to do that in jsom?
Also shouldn't the primary concern be the accuracy of mapped data and not visual representation of it since "labeling purposes" concern is addressable by updates to the visual representation of that data?
user_8466505 (2020-07-25 02:59:05+00:00): Hello,
You can do so on either iD and JOSM. 

TheAdventurer64
MxxCon (2020-07-25 20:31:44+00:00): I'm sorry. I spent like good 40-45min trying to figure how to make a label relationship with iD similar to what i see with LES, but I was unable to replicate that.
Patrik_B (2023-10-28 19:36:40+00:00): Hi @ILembe , is "7035224389" from this changeset also a school or you created this node by a mistake? I don't see any hints of a building/paths on any of the imagery I have available. Thank you https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7035224389/history
abakus_uploader (2019-12-05 23:31:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
orangeisnon (2021-07-04 13:52:50+00:00): This isn't a public road, it is a private driveway used by the businesses here. They have a big problem with vandalism and theft, and having their driveway on the map isn't going to help.
loyakris (2021-07-05 09:43:33+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for providing the information and correcting the edit.
Apologies for adding the road as 'publicly' accessible.
Thanks once again for sharing your inputs,always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
loyakris
user_5359 (2019-12-05 10:32:45+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Du hast zu Deinen Punkt keinereli Information hinzugefügt. Bitte beachte dass bei OSM die Beschreibung von Objekten die höchste Priorität hat. Objekte, die nur aus einem Punkt bestehen, haben keinen Sinn. Als deutsche Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie beschreibe ich was?“ empfehle ich https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a (Vorsicht: Viele Information damit lange Ladezeiten)

Eventuell hilft Dir auch schon die Seite https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Riding weiter.
BCNorwich (2019-12-05 08:21:06+00:00): Hi, I think you've got this business in the wrong place! Could you please check and amend the position?
Regards Bernard.
solmaps2 (2019-12-05 08:28:52+00:00): may i ask what is your reference in claiming so?

spreadPrivacy,
solmaps2
BCNorwich (2019-12-05 10:38:47+00:00): It's just what I think, so I pose the question. You placed it there, is it in the correct position? If so all well and good, sorry to have troubled you.
SomeoneElse (2019-12-05 13:36:06+00:00): Their website claims "20 Paoli Pike, Paoli, PA 19301", FWIW
woodpeck (2019-12-06 09:11:45+00:00): How can it be source=survey and then so wrong? solmaps2, were you actually there to check, or was your source=survey incorrect?
user_5359 (2019-12-05 10:26:18+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! 
Als Hersteller von Touristischen Informationssystemen sollte der Wert einer suberen Klassiifizierung bekannt sein: Ich habe mir erlaubt ein office=it hinzuzufügen.
dpfleghaar (2019-12-05 11:10:42+00:00): Stimmt. Danke für die Ergänzung.
Carnildo (2019-12-06 09:05:57+00:00): Did you intend to turn a couple stretches of George Washington Way into barriers?