piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
RunTrails (2021-03-30 15:55:31+00:00): Are you joking? Hundreds of people a day use this for leisure for walking, running, hiking, cycling, and horseback riding. You should read the first sentence of the wiki, "A park is an area of open space for recreational use, usually designed and in semi-natural state with grassy areas, trees and bushes." This is open space, used for recreational purposes, and is kept natural (most of the canal is returning to nature and is not maintained).
map per (2021-03-30 16:06:07+00:00): The parts inside of Washington are probably parks as they are in an urban area. But most of the 200km long protected area (all the way to Cumberland) probably isn't a leisure=park.
BCNorwich (2021-02-20 08:26:47+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

May I suggest looking at this link:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course  It will help you to tag golf course features to OSM best practice. I've made a few tweaks to the features you've already made.

If you need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
Math1985 (2021-02-19 22:43:51+00:00): Lekker snel erbij! Goed werk!
JeroenvanderGun (2021-02-20 01:08:11+00:00): Ik zie een Open Street, ik zet hem op Open Street Map.
EvansEhouman (2021-02-19 22:28:57+00:00): this is an experimental forest patches developed by Cirad
Sammyhawkrad (2021-02-20 04:30:27+00:00): The shape should cover the outline of the building so map the building using its corners. Add the name of the church and denomination if you know that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99619932
Sammyhawkrad (2021-02-20 04:27:04+00:00): Hello Sarso, it's good to have you here and I hope to see you contribute more to the map in Ghana. Thanks for your valuable update.

There is a small issue with your edit that you may need to rectify. Remove the building tag from the feature since the whole area is not occupied by the building and map the building within the area.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99619978
Sarso (2021-02-20 19:19:59+00:00): Hello Sammyhawkrad, thanks for your feedback. So I am thinking. Do I delete the edits and re-mark them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99619978
Sammyhawkrad (2021-02-20 19:26:31+00:00): You do not have to delete them. Just drag the edges to the corners of the building, when you are done press 'S' (while the building is selected) on the keyboard to square the angles.
hoserab (2021-02-24 22:41:59+00:00): Hello Mahsa,

Per my comment on changeset 99615513 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99615513) this building was demolished. It. Does. Not. Exist.

I have once again summarily deleted it. Stop adding it back.
MxxCon (2021-02-20 02:04:32+00:00): Hello.
iD editor has a specific preset categories for nursing homes and elderly group homes. It would be great if you updated this location with such preset if appropriate.(and "description" field won't be necessary) 👍
WambacherWest (2021-04-24 13:17:37+00:00): Dear RunTrails, 
the inner-city parks in DC are not "National Parks" in the definition of OSM, please read about the concept here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=national park
 
Also I checked https://www.nps.gov/state/dc/index.htm for parks maintained by the NPS, and could not verify such operation. 
Parks are repaired now.
RunTrails (2021-04-24 18:23:43+00:00): You are incorrect, they're clearly listed on the site you linked to https://www.nps.gov/state/dc/index.htm you just have to actually read the descriptions to see what specific parks are under which area. Second, you should actually consult a NPS map such as this one https://www.nps.gov/nama/planyourvisit/maps.htm and you'll find there are a lot of National Park Service administered lands in downtown DC. If you were a local you'd actually know this information.
WambacherWest (2021-04-27 18:27:37+00:00): It does not matter who _maintains_ an object. 
The NPS e.g. appears to maintain the Washington Monument. That does not make the monument a national park.  
A landscaped, inner-city park is a leisure=park. 
A national park is a large area of land set aside for  the protection of the natural environment. 
https://www.nps.gov/nama/planyourvisit/maps.htm has the title "National Mall and Memorial Parks". Not "National Parks".
Interestingly, the site uses OpenStreetMap data, so if you tag the President's Park as National Park, that map might reflect that mapping, not the real status.
BTW: Immediately changing the tagging back before the discussion is over is edit-warring.
clay_c (2021-04-27 22:05:18+00:00): Many NPS-administered lands are listed on that site that aren't national parks. This isn't unique to DC. If you check out Utah, for example, you'll find that Arches and Bryce Canyon have "national park" labeled above them, Cedar Breaks and Dinosaur have "national monument", and Glen Canyon has "national recreation area". All of those are fit to describe as national parks in OSM. Most of the parks listed in DC have no such label above them. They are municipal parks of Washington, DC, which happen to be administered by the NPS. That doesn't necessarily make them national parks.
RunTrails (2021-04-27 22:34:27+00:00): If it is a National, Federal level administered park with Federal Protections protecting it from any type of development then it is a National Park, just like National Monuments, National Recreation Areas are.
RunTrails (2021-04-27 22:36:49+00:00): BTW my edits were changed before the discussion was over, Thanks.
WambacherWest (2021-04-28 09:06:02+00:00): So you seriously consider a National Monument being a National Park, as well?
I strongly disagree.
RunTrails (2021-04-28 14:11:31+00:00): Absolutely, clay_c gave excellent examples of National Monuments (outside of DC) that should be considered national parks. Those are Monument Lands not a statue kind of monument.
But as another example of a small National Park, see Gloria Dei Church National Historic Site in Philadelphia. Its National Park status is because it's affiliated with the larger Independence National Historical Park, and these small DC parks (Farragut, Dupont, etc.) are all affiliated under the National Mall and Memorial Parks unit.
ezekielf (2021-04-28 14:27:22+00:00): It's important to understand that the OSM tag "boundary=national_park" does not have the same meaning as "National Park" defined by the US National Park Service.  They often overlap, but not always.
ZeLonewolf (2021-04-28 18:15:38+00:00): Hello all.  This question was actually discussed at length, and the consensus at the time was documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands

That article lists the specific tagging that should be applied to those areas, and if any tagging is different from that description, it should be changed.

If mappers disagree with the guidance listed in the United States/Public Lands wiki page, that should be raised and discussed on the talk-us mailing list.  Let's make sure we're not inventing new interpretations when there are already documented conventions.
ezekielf (2021-04-29 02:41:53+00:00): RunTrails and WambacherWest, I've raised this issue on the OSM US Slack and the Talk-us mailing list if you care to join.
https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2021-April/020969.html
alesarrett (2021-02-20 07:28:10+00:00): Ciao Alepoz, in questo changeset hai modificato alcuni elementi di un tratto di via Gozzi: hai segnato senso unico verso sud, ma i mezzi pubblici non possono invece ancora andare verso nord? Le lanes inoltre rimangono 3, ma momentaneamente c'è una deviazione.
Hai fatto un controllo sul posto?
Alepoz (2021-02-20 08:05:57+00:00): Sono passato ieri pomeriggio, la corsia verso nord è diventata una e da qualche tempo ci possono passare solo i mezzi pubblici, il tutto lasciando sulla carreggiata un bel po' di strisce gialle diagonali. Verso sud la corsia è tuttora percorribile dai mezzi privati. Per il breve tratto all'incrocio in piazza Salvemini si tratta di una situazione analoga a quella di via Beato Pellegrino, a senso unico verso porta Trento e percorribile in senso opposto dai mezzi pubblici.
alesarrett (2021-02-20 09:08:48+00:00): Ok grazie.
Non sarebbe cmq meglio esplicitare lanes=2 e lanes:psv:backword=1?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes:psv
Alepoz (2021-02-22 18:44:08+00:00): Penso che sia lo stesso, ma se è ritenuto più attuale lanes:backward:psv=1 metti pure.
Patr1k_P (2021-05-02 11:58:51+00:00): tu si sa asi sekol, malo by byt "Námestie sv. Anny"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27186775
Dodko (2021-05-02 12:22:16+00:00): áno oprav to
BCNorwich (2021-02-20 08:45:49+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed your 1000 metre long gate. Could place it as a single node on the track in the same manner as other gates in the area. The gate can be tagged to describe the type of access through it. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
childwickburyguy (2021-02-20 19:54:27+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Thanks for your help.
I have had another go and changed the road to a private access, while also adding two gates that were not already there. Can you check I've added and tagged correctly?
Many thanks
BCNorwich (2021-02-26 08:57:41+00:00): Hi, I waited while you made amendments. 
Looking at it just now the only thing I added was horse=yes to the gate in the middle, because horse access is allowed up to the gate on each side. All is OK.

Regards Bernard
childwickburyguy (2021-02-26 11:11:14+00:00): Great to hear - thanks for keeping an eye out on this!
ifkmaps (2023-10-26 15:53:36+00:00): Hi @childwickburyguy, I don't know if you'll see this but I'll ask anyway - is it open to walkers? I'm assuming if it is open to horses then it would be?
BCNorwich (2023-10-26 16:56:05+00:00): Hello ifkmaps, The track is not any form of Public Right of Way, (horse or foot), so I would assume there is no legal public access for walkers. I think the tag horse=yes is incorrect on a private track. If horses are allowed on a private track the tag would be horse=private.

Regards Bernard.
Arlo James Barnes (2021-04-26 16:32:27+00:00): Thank you for this lovely contribution! Do you mind if I move some of your `name` tags to `species` or `taxon` tags (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/key:species) ?
Arlo James Barnes (2021-05-14 01:03:41+00:00): Well, I did so. If you need it in `name` for some reason you can change it back, but that's not the usual practice. If you see this and want to meet some of the frequent contributors to OSM in NM, you can visit the #local-newmexico channel in https://slack.openstreetmap.us; cheers!
Carnildo (2021-02-21 05:21:44+00:00): Is there a reason why you tagged a section of WA-206 as "primary"?  The usual convention is that state routes are tagged as "secondary" unless they're particularly significant or particularly minor (and WA-206 is verging on "particularly minor").
bas57 (2021-02-22 15:23:21+00:00): Hi Carnildo, I thought that I change it back before I save it.  I went in and fix it.  Thanks for letting me know.
Gino-52 (2021-03-30 16:31:34+00:00): Hallo Wipflord,
wie kommst Du darauf.
Ich habe es mir heute nochmal angesehen. das ist eine eingezäunte Streuobstwiese.
Ich habe Dein Kommentar wieder entfernt.
Viele Grüße
Norbert
aceman444 (2024-01-28 13:44:42+00:00): Zdravim, podla akej schemy mapujete tieto linky MHD? Lebo sucasna PTv2 nema znacky ako 'direction', nema mat v 'name' poznamky ako "spat" ci "tam".
Nemozu mat ako zastavku/nastupiste bod reprezentujuci stanicu a pod. Tieto linky MHD v Hlohovci az po Trnavu (napr. 203415) su dost nefunkcne.
Tomas_J (2024-01-28 13:51:18+00:00): Pozriem na to a opravím. Pre zaujímavosť : Co myslíš tym "nefunkčné"? Aká aplikácia tieto relácie požíva?
aceman444 (2024-01-28 14:18:11+00:00): Nejde o to, aka aplikacia to pouziva, ale ako to ma byt :) Pouziva to napr. OsmAnd na navigaciu po MHD, kontroluje to OSM Inspector, vykresluje to aj osm.org (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/48.43378/17.80465&layers=T).
Tomas_J (2024-01-28 14:25:58+00:00): Jj, len som chcel vedieť , či okrem čiary na mape to ma ak nejakú praktickú aplikáciu.
aceman444 (2024-01-28 15:07:27+00:00): Tak hej ma. Minimalne ten OsmAnd cez to pekne odnaviguje v rezime pesiaka (este s par chybickami). U plno ostatnych znaciek v OSM by sa tiez o tom dalo pochybovat. Ale zrejme to niekoho bavi a preto to tam moze byt. Len teda ked uz do toho zasahujete tak treba to robit podla pravidiel. Znackam, ktorym clovek nerozumie (ani ja niektorym:)) tak ich nema pridavat a ani odoberat.
Tomas_J (2024-01-28 15:16:27+00:00): Áno, snažím sa, ale som rád keď ma niekto chytrý opravi a navedie na správnu cestu. :)
aceman444 (2024-01-29 20:35:53+00:00): Linky MHD by mali vyzerat takto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bratislava#Mestsk%C3%A1_hromadn%C3%A1_doprava . Body public_transport=stop_position su nepovinne.
Tomas_J (2024-01-29 20:40:23+00:00): OK, pozriem to.
Tomas_J (2024-01-29 22:25:21+00:00): Urobil som nejake zmeny (viz. zoznam nizsie). Mozes pozriet, prosim, na vysledok?

Problemy mam s tymto: 1. linku mhd v Hlohovci by som najradsej celu vymazal a naklikal znova - trasa linky mhd nie je dokoncena, na zobrazeni vyzera spojito, ale kedze je okruzna chybaju tam useky, ktorymi prechadza viac krat  2. master relaciu linky mhd nemozem vytvorit, pretoze nema ziadny smer naspat (je okruzna);

Zmenil som nazvy relacii, zmenil direction na via, u primestskych busov som pospajal cesty relacie aby nadvazovali, doplnil som role nastupist a miest zastavenia, do relacie, doplnil som tagy zastavok, aby mohli byt nastupistami (platform), nastupistia v relacii som posunul na koniec zoznamu clenov (pod ways).
aceman444 (2024-01-29 22:34:33+00:00): Nastupistia dajte prosim na zaciatok clenov relacie. Ostatne pozriem.
aceman444 (2024-01-29 22:34:58+00:00): master_route relacia moze mat aj jedneho clena, nevadi to.
Tomas_J (2024-01-29 22:41:36+00:00): Nástupištia na začiatok? Presúval som ich na koniec na základe Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bratislava#Mestsk%C3%A1_hromadn%C3%A1_doprava

"Členmi relácie sú úseky ciest (ways), po ktorých linka premáva, zoradené od východzej zastávky po konečnú ako súvislá cesta (JOSM vie zobraziť, či je cesta súvislá/spojitá). POTOM sú jednotlivé zastávky..."
Tomas_J (2024-01-29 22:52:55+00:00): Presunul som zastavky naspat na zaciatok.
aceman444 (2024-01-30 06:10:01+00:00): Pardon, asi to kedysi bolo jedno ci su na konci alebo na zaciatku. Ale OSM Inspector vyzaduje zastavky na zaciatku relacie a je to uvedene aj na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport#Service_routes . Opravim to v tom clanku o Bratislave.
Tomas_J (2024-02-07 15:55:48+00:00): Ahoj. Tak som vyprodukoval master relacie pre linky viz. nizsie. Linku 1 v Hlohovci som upravil (jednu cast som uplne vymazal a druhu naklikal spravne). Problemy, ktore mam: 1. pre primestske linky oficialne neexistuje rovnake cislo pre smer tam a spat, linka spat ma ine cislo a neda sa teda zoskupit podla ref do master_route. 2. mhd linka c. 1 ma v Hlohovci vela variant - cca 5-6, pdobne su na tom linky 2 a 3. Nefunguje to ako vo velkych mestach (na zaklade pravidelneho internalu a trasy) ale meni sa interval aj trasa. Navyse mam pocit, ze stav nie je prilis stabilny. Ma za tejto situacie zmysel vytvarat vsetky varianty? Zatial som vybral variantu, ktora jazdi najcastejsie. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17168838
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12341679
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12376553
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-20 08:30:28+00:00): Bonjour,
super ces ajouts. Je suis passé sur la ferme pour y ajouter "l'emrpise" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908986613
et y poser une question https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2545635
à plus
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
eggie (2021-02-20 07:17:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2021-02-20 05:19:04+00:00): Hello! Please use the key name instead Name. I have correct this.
LivingWithDragons (2021-02-20 01:11:36+00:00): Hi computer joe. Your changes look good and nothing wrong with them from what I can tell.
The car park could be mapped as an area, and the service road into drawn to make it clear what road you enter from.

Welcome back to OpenStreetMap!
user_5359 (2021-02-20 05:28:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. 
GlobalID={D347F78A-C35D-47DB-86E8-68345C173357}
OBJECTID=39958
TR_LENGTH=0.27330602
Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
Note_Fixer (2021-02-20 00:36:50+00:00): Note 1637433
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
treestryder (2021-02-20 17:07:30+00:00): Take a look at the Michigan Wiki page and the OSM page on sidewalks, before adding to many "sidewalks". A sidewalk in British parlance is walkway along the edge of a motor way. Michigan has very few of those, usually only in downtown areas. Michigan also allows bicycles on cement paths through people's yards, that we call sidewalks.
user_11418917 (2021-02-20 19:14:16+00:00): STOP ADDING SPAM!!
Paultergeist (2021-05-18 19:11:18+00:00): Hi, I have reverted part of this changeset that converts Aldi from node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/81999853 into way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423752475.

This is because the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/81999853 also contains Ace Hardware, so I moved Aldi tags back to a node and have added another node for Ace.

Let me know if you have any questions.
Kseniya_Nekrasava (2021-03-03 06:22:38+00:00): Hi! Thank you for your mapping! But it's necessary to add tag `name` to feature, if it has no name.) Just leave it empty. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99623043
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2021-03-29 06:25:34+00:00): From the satellite image you can see there's a oneway street?
Note_Fixer (2021-02-20 01:59:11+00:00): Note 2534959
andi9876 (2021-02-21 16:49:37+00:00): reverted
andi9876 (2021-02-21 16:48:49+00:00): del
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:31:16+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:31:31+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
aceman444 (2021-02-20 03:05:54+00:00): bus 11
angys (2021-02-20 16:04:22+00:00): Hello, you dont need to add “shop” for the building..
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-20 13:42:09+00:00): Ciao. Questa modifica (e altre analoghe) mi sembrano edit (semi-)automatici non discussi sugli appositi canali. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits Puoi venire su talk-it a parlarne? Grazie, Andrea
0815jh007 (2021-02-22 02:22:20+00:00): Ciao Andream i hope i may answer in english. I do those edit by very little pieces to watch every changed url and check it for http-status: 200 if i change it. i change a maximum of 15 url in one take and look for all urls. nevertheless: i use overpass-turbo to find this common mistake and so all edited places are grouped to gether and it looks very automatically. are you familiar with overpass, osm-xml-data and python, than i would really love to talk to you a little more.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-22 14:57:08+00:00): Hi! Yes, I'm familiar with overpass and python. Did you discuss these automatic edits? Frankly I see nothing wrong in these fixes, but guidelines must be followed. BR, Andrea
0815jh007 (2021-02-22 17:31:54+00:00): on wikidata they have a process to apply for bot edits. tons of maproulette-jobs are stupid enough to be done by mechanical edits: phone/fax-numbers, move all key-a to key-b, and so on. do you know github repos of tools? should we establish one?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-22 21:45:41+00:00): > on wikidata they have a process to apply for bot edits.

OSM also has it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

> tons of maproulette-jobs are stupid enough to be done by mechanical edits: phone/fax-numbers, move all key-a to key-b

Because people try to use maproulette to evade rules about bot editing (though mindless manual editing still falls under Automated Edits CoC).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:43:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-24 03:42:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99862876 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of complaints, reverting some Facebook tagfiddling.  See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/99736842 et al.