piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ACarlotti (2020-08-01 20:23:29+00:00): I think you've misunderstood how junctions of ways are mapped in OpenStreetMap. According to your changeset, it is no longer possible to get onto taxiway D from taxiway L, or onto the runway from taxiway D, since these ways do not connect (via a shared node). Assuming this is a mistake, can you correct it?
I have a couple more questions in case you have the local knowledge to answer this. According to Esri World Imagery (which I think is the most recent I've seen), the grass to the northeast of taxiway D comes closer to this taxiway than the current mapping shows - is that up-to-date? Also, the same imagery shows runway 10/28 as closed but still in existence - is that the current situation?
Thanks,
ACarlotti
feket (2020-07-31 08:30:06+00:00): Üdv a felhasználói táborban!
Tudomásom szerint az Orczy ház már nem áll. Ha valamelyik térképi funkcióhoz akarsz dátumot rendelni, használhatod a "start_date", "end_date" címkéket, ne a "name" mezőbe írd azokat!
Megszűnt, lebontott, stb. elemek esetén javaslom az "lifecycle prefix"-ek vagy  akár a "date namespace" használatát (a koncepciók előnyeiről, hátrányairól itt olvashatsz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts)

Üdvözlettel:
Fekete
kapazao (2020-07-29 14:14:55+00:00): Why are you editing coastline to low water, have you read wiki? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=coastline
"By common agreement the coastline is tagged at mean high water springs line. Basically that is the highest line the water reaches in normal circumstances."

It seems that you don't read wiki and you don't check your edits with a validator. I see a lot of errors and broken things in your current edits in this area.
Please give references of your edits and use PNOA imagery and updated editors. Also try to fix the errors using validators.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88633546
kapazao (2020-08-05 13:45:18+00:00): Revertido a causa de ediciones incorrectas y no responder a comentarios. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88985861
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88633546
totera (2020-07-28 17:58:33+00:00): I tag wikidata=* e wikipedia=* per i comuni sono già nelle relazioni, non duplicarli sul centro abitato
artem95vlasovets (2020-08-03 13:39:37+00:00): Hi! Please tell me why you removed so many traffic signals? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88633927
user_385682 (2020-08-03 16:57:40+00:00): Hi - It's temporary. Replacing them tomorrow. In an effort to clean up and align Northern Boulevard I replaced dozens of small segments with longer ones to make alignment and maintenance easier.  It was necessary to remove the traffic signals.
Anton Khorev (2020-09-09 10:05:53+00:00): Did you replace the traffic signals?

Why was it necessary to remove them? Was it because iD deleted them when you deleted the containing street segment? Do you know you can extract nodes from ways by right-clicking and selecting 'Extract' or pressing E? Extracted nodes are not going to be deleted along with the ways.

Do you know that some of small segments  that you've deleted existed for a reason? For example, this one represented a different lane configuration:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420298376/history  
Look at `lanes` and `turn:lanes:forward` tags.
Leo Slager (2020-07-29 09:45:32+00:00): camping weer verwijderd van de kaart op grond van je eigen opmerking:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2283523#map=18/51.48873/5.22231
eggie (2020-07-28 19:29:14+00:00): Je zet nergens de naam bij je campings?
Leo Slager (2020-07-28 23:22:47+00:00): En dan zet hij ook nog eens een opmerking op de kaart dat de camping niet meer bestaat.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2283523
Vermoedelijk is hij aan het spelen met zijn nieuwe app-je.
Al zijn changesets reverten ?
eggie (2020-07-29 06:01:42+00:00): Als bron wordt  	https://www.brabantsbuitenleven.nl/ genoemd.
Het zijn minicampings,... maar waarom geen naam of als er een naam staat heet de camping AED?!
eggie (2020-07-29 06:12:50+00:00): Nog maar eens een PB gestuurd met het verzoek om de zaken aan te vullen.
eggie (2020-07-29 06:29:19+00:00): Giesmobiel.. Hier kan dus worden toegevoegd name=Minicamping Brabants Buitenleven
Het beste kun je op de adresnode de info toevoegen en evt. met phone=+31......
Een kleine moeite en dan heeft iedereen er ook iets aan. 

MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2020-07-28 20:37:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
DaveF (2021-02-19 00:16:08+00:00): Hi
How much of this wall is in existence &/or visible?
Mauls (2021-02-19 18:41:11+00:00): Very little is visible - any sections that are should have a barrier= tag added.
DaveF (2021-02-19 23:16:24+00:00): It requires removing then.
Mauls (2021-02-19 23:17:51+00:00): It is entirely proper for such cases - see the entry for the tag in the OSM wiki.
DaveF (2021-02-20 00:26:34+00:00): Only if it exists & is visible.
SomeoneElse (2021-03-26 17:01:27+00:00): I think that the text in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=citywalls is trying to choose between "still functioning as a city wall" (e.g. York mediaeval walls) compared to "still viisble as ruins, but not a barrier any more" (e.g. from memory London?), rather than "we know were it went but there isn't anything left (e.g. most stretches of York Roman wall, and by the sounds of it here).
eggie (2020-07-28 19:27:20+00:00): Beste Giesmobiel.. zet je ook name=... bij je tags. Het is zo onvolledig...
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-28 20:33:15+00:00): Dag Enduh. .. Kerken zijn al altijd lastig yte mappen omdat je de tagging ook op het gebouw kunt zitten ivm de rendering.
Een extra adres op de gebouwomtrek  hoeft niet, want er is al een adresnode. Die adresnode is nodig om het adres te vinden in routeapps en gps.
Met een adresnode werkt het t beste. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-29 05:55:42+00:00): Heet deze camping werkelij AED?
Mvg eggie
eggie (2020-07-29 06:23:51+00:00): De camping heet Camping de Kwaalburg
name= gebruiken we voor de naam van de camping.
De voorgaande mapper heeft AED toegevoegd als name= ...
Dat klopt uiteraard niet.
Het beste kun je je changesets controleren met een reguliere editor als iD of josm.
Hier vind je al je changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Giesmobiel/history#map=10/51.4885/5.3574

De naam heb ik veranderd in Camping de Kwaalburg
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-29 10:26:14+00:00): De aed apart gemapt.. Je had hier van een aed een camping gemaakt.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-07-28 19:28:15+00:00): ... en hoe heet de camping?
Gr eggie
Carnildo (2020-07-29 06:12:00+00:00): I suppose this means I need to drive past there, again, and observe that it looks an awful lot like a driveway, again?
user_11166885 (2020-08-24 02:49:53+00:00): Fonte nomi?
johantiden (2020-07-30 19:17:33+00:00): Hi! Nice job on mapping so many details!

One thing though: When mapping parking surface, make sure that the road leading to them cuts through the area so that routing softwares can properly find the way to them. It's better to make the parking area too large, overlapping onto the road (since this is the way any vehicle would enter/exit the parking anyway.
rayleigh1 (2020-07-31 20:53:24+00:00): Thanks, will keep that in mind!
Tym K (2020-07-28 21:28:22+00:00): Looks good, I just added in a source tag.
Andre68 (2020-07-29 06:26:44+00:00): The coastline at that position is wrong! Coastline is at high tide line! Tidal areas like wetland are below. I will NOT fix that again! You should or others will do... You have created overlapping coastlines now and this is a real BAD thing!
See your created problems here:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&lon=21.89376&lat=60.13858&zoom=13&overlays=coastline,coastline_error_lines,line_not_a_ring,line_overlap,line_invalid,line_direction,questionable,coastline_error_points,unconnected,intersections,not_a_ring,double_node,tagged_node

Please learn how coastlines work and which speacial rules they have.
SHARCRASH (2020-07-29 12:13:46+00:00): Hello! What is the point of creating sidewalks which lead to nothing? Like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831369177/history
Please avoid creating superfluous elements which overwhelm OSM servers for nothing or even very little use. You've certainly noticed lately that the map got very slow and OSM Foundation is searching once again for new servers. There are far more interesting things to plot than what is already obvious. Thanks for your understanding.
user_3961358 (2020-07-29 13:49:47+00:00): Is it always that obvious where sidewalks are when you're planning as a tourist? People wanting their kids to walk safely? You deleted quite a bunch and made sidewalks that lead to nothing anymore. Who are you to decide? It's open.
SHARCRASH (2020-07-29 15:18:19+00:00): Yes it is obvious in residential/urban areas, specially when it is in a school area. 

Your argument of planning a route for the safeness of kids is precisely my point too. By adding sidewalks, which often renders the whole routing too complex, makes it difficult to follow up "turn by turn". Meaning the automated routing planners will follow complex directions and rather mislead the parents in one direction and then another, distracting their attention from the real danger during their walks. Also at certain places where there is a plotted sidewalk but it is not connected to a crossway in an opposite desired direction, the planner will place the routing over the main road instead of the sidewalk, misleading also the users. Here for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7762386161

People are not stupid, they know that in urban areas most often there are sidewalks, and on countryside roads which they will certainly follow anyway if needed, they will pay attention to their kids. If there is a sidewalk in such area, it is great to plot it, like this example i updated recently: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84374588/history 

Also did you think about the conflict with hiking routes? Did you pay attention if there any? What if there are any and contributors did not update the route with the sidewalks, certainly because it is a lot of work. How many times i've seen this! This issue will certainly mislead users too! 

So, my point here is not decide over everyone else, hence i started with a question, but to talk about what is best for the map to keep it as clear as possible for kind of user. By experience,  i know that by making a map too complex with sidewalks going on all direction is not really assisting users who are trying to find their way easily.
user_3961358 (2020-07-29 15:43:48+00:00): Thanks for the useful info. I'll respect it. Crosswalks are why my sidewalks started in the first place.

Hiking routes are a big construction zone, as I've seen while adding trail markers and linking them where possible. Many Autopedestre have been modified with the recent simplification, new industrial zones crossing MTB tracks...
eggie (2020-07-29 06:08:22+00:00): Beste Giesmobiel,

Je bedoeling zal ongetwijfeld goed zijn, maar dit lijkt toch op een bijdrage die veelal onvolledig is. De meeste campings hebben geen naam.
Zou je de moeite willen nemen de gegevens aan te vullen.
Hier kun je al je changesets vinden.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Giesmobiel/history

MVG,
Eggie
olehz (2021-08-30 13:37:55+00:00): з яких міркувань ти зі струмка зробив річку? його перестрибнути можна
Myazyk (2021-09-07 22:09:37+00:00): Будеш якось їхати зі Львова, зупинись у Меденичах і знімки відео, як ти струмок Летнянка перескакуватимеш. 
До речі, це 4-та за величиною річка Дрогобиччини
olehz (2021-09-08 17:42:40+00:00): https://nadoloni.com/letnyanka.png - яка тут ширина? явно меньше 2 метрів, давай на гроші поспоримо, що перестрибну?

на Стрию чи в Тисмениці є місця де можна купатись і на човні надувному можна плисти (весною як мінімум), а от в Летнянці дуже сумнівно. якась дивна ріка з глибиною 5 см.

ну і на комерційних мапах (гугл наприклад), і на старих радянських генштабівських мапах Летнянка позначена як струмок.
Myazyk (2021-09-09 13:26:29+00:00): Нє, я на гроші не спорю - ти мене обшахруєш 😄

Ширина Летнянки десь 2-3 метри. Я згідний, що вона не є великою рікою, але вона формує басейн, як і Бистриця-Тисьменицька. 
Ну, відносно Летнянки можна по-різному говорити чи струмок чи ріка, бо вона надто велика для струмка і недостатньо велика для ріки. Але я б її позначив як ріка. 
З рікою Стрий не порівняно, бо Стрий не лінією треба позначати, а береги наносити. 

На старих картах Тисьмениця позначена не як струмок? Не хочу шукати
olehz (2021-09-09 14:40:30+00:00): ой, це недобре. в ОСМ домовились потоки води, які можна перестрибнути і по котрих навіть на надувному човні не поплавати, позначати як stream.

я не проти, якщо ти хочеш змінити це правило. але що значить формує басейн? тобі треба чітко описати за яким принципом ти пропонуєш розділяти ріки/струмки і дати проголосувати учасникам. бо інакше буде каша. Наприклад, Серет - там обєм води такий самий як в Летнянці приблизно, навіть більший.і таких приладів море, то усю країну доведеться переглядати.
olehz (2021-09-09 14:46:40+00:00): до речі, порівняв старі австрійські мапи з радянськими. там русло змінили. Летнянку пустили по штучному каналу для зрошення полів. так що половина Летнянки це навіть не струмок, а канал
Myazyk (2021-09-10 07:31:08+00:00): Те, що частину русла ріки змінили штучно, не робить з ріки каналу. Ріка має витік і має гирло
Myazyk (2021-09-10 07:33:34+00:00): Про який ти Серет? Той, що штучно і насильно переіменований з Побуку? Він явно менший за Летнянку. Буду у Меденичах, сфоткаю для тебе Летнянку
eggie (2020-07-28 20:25:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

review.. Wat is nu je bedoeling hier? 
MVG,
Eggie
mueschel (2020-08-01 11:29:43+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong with a tag on this node, please check:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3802493782
AnonJason (2020-08-03 14:35:47+00:00): Thanks, the addr:housenumber has been updated.
Jose Luis Infante (2020-07-29 17:18:04+00:00): Hola!
Gràcies per la teva edició. Doncs si, cal dividir la via en diferents trams si aquests tenen característiques diferents. Així que és correcte que un tram de la via tingui l'etiqueta oneway=no i l'altre oneway=yes.
Pots consultar la wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org o a la web https://learnosm.org.
Salutacions!!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-11-15 13:52:38+00:00): esto no es un puente https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/831377985/history
riiga (2020-07-28 20:29:46+00:00): Användaren ErikSemlan har flyttat stora delar av centrala Västerås så att det "stämmer överens" med flygfoton, men det är det klassiska nybörjarmisstaget att kartan stämmer och flygfotot är det som ska justeras. Jag har rullat tillbaka hans ändringar efter bästa förmåga och försökt behålla så mycket av den nyttiga information han även bidragit till kartan. Ni som brukar redigera i detta område, dubbelkolla gärna att jag inte har raderat något av misstag.

---

The user ErikSemlan moved parts of Västerås in his changeset to "align" with imagery. I've attempted to revert this to my best ability, but I might have affected some subsequent edits. Anyone who commonly edits in this area, please check so that I didn't remove anything that you added.
felipeeugenio (2020-07-28 20:50:48+00:00): Hola Estimado. Gracias por sus ediciones.
por favor no pegar las áreas a las calles.
Ya lo resolví.
saludos
Gadiel Sepúlveda (2020-08-18 15:00:54+00:00): Gracias.
user_5359 (2022-01-29 07:14:30+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7762521570. What is the meaning of the tag yes=no ?
user_5359 (2022-03-30 05:41:50+00:00): I removed this tag.
klnkengi (2020-08-04 19:09:56+00:00): Hi, you marked one part of the Down East Sunrise Trail as "oneway=yes". Is that really correct?
sailenggirl (2020-08-05 00:26:44+00:00): no sorry about that.. I am also unsure how to mark it for ATVs and for when there is snow dogsledding, xc skiing and snowmobiling
klnkengi (2020-08-05 19:24:24+00:00): I am not completely sure either.

I checked the trail rules on https://www.sunrisetrail.org/about-the-downeast-sunrise-trail/sunrise-trail-rules/ and would probably tag it like that:

foot = designated
horse = designated
bicycle = designated
dog_sled = designated
ski:nordic = designated
atv = designated
snowmobile = designated 
horse:conditional = no @ snow
atv:conditional = no @ snow

There is no tag for dog sledding in the wiki, but dog_sled is already used sometimes (albeit rarely).

By the way: If you know that the path exists, you could probably also delete the „fixme=verify“ tags. Not really sure what that’s supposed to mean anyways.
phidauex (2020-08-05 20:42:02+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding to the cycle network! The tag for a way that can be used for nordic skiing is "piste:type = nordic" - piste is a french word for ski path that found its way into OSM. No need to indicate that it is only valid during snow - presumably people won't try to ski on it in the summer, though it isn't illegal so they can certainly try.

I also noticed that some of the ways are named inconsistently, some are Downeast Sunrise Trail and some are Down East Sunrise Trail. Can you confirm which is correct, and then update the incorrect ones?

Thanks, and let us know if you have additional questions.
phidauex (2020-08-05 20:45:37+00:00): And while I'm asking questions, is the cycleway next to the railroad line? Or is it on top of the railroad line? Aerial imagery is a bit unclear and I'm not from the area. If it is next to the railroad, then it is mapped correctly now, but if it is on top, as it is in many western rail trails, then we would want to merge the ways.
sailenggirl (2020-08-05 20:58:49+00:00): The part I added is next to the railway after the parking lot.
phidauex (2020-08-05 21:27:47+00:00): Thanks for confirming! I tidied up a few of the nearby route relation connections so all should be good now. Happy riding!
joost schouppe (2021-12-21 10:19:18+00:00): I removed this caravan site, as it seems to be just a parking
ACarlotti (2020-07-31 20:24:38+00:00): Is there pedestrian and cycle access past this closure point? If so, then you need to add a short length of cycleway to connect this up.
Glassman (2020-07-28 22:32:04+00:00): TIP: Imagery offset can cause the features to appear in the wrong location. Imagery offset can be adjusted using the tools on the right hand side.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88642047
mueschel (2020-08-01 11:29:58+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong with a tag on this node, please check:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7762654571
OuterPace (2020-08-03 14:57:55+00:00): Thanks, the node has been updated.
Witterung (2020-11-28 18:30:58+00:00): Hi solongago,

may you please tell me what you are changing relating to the National Wetlands Inventory?

Kind regards,
Peter
gscholz (2020-07-31 06:05:26+00:00): Hi Carlos,
your recent changesets have created a big amount of errors in the OSM database regarding overapping streets:

tus conjuntos de cambios recientes han creado una gran cantidad de errores en la base de datos de OSM con respecto a las calles que se superponen:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-100.43445&lat=22.09162&zoom=9&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
¿Puedes por favor arreglar esto?

Guido
PT-53 (2020-08-09 09:41:06+00:00): Hallo  GarryX3D,
wie weit sind denn die Bauarbeiten an diesem Kreisel:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371367775/history
wie lange dauert die Baustelle voraussichtlich noch an?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
Gefunden mit brouter-suspects:
http://brouter.de/osmoscope/#map=17/8.30406/48.9668&l=http://brouter.de/osmoscope/active_deferred.json
GarryX3D (2020-08-09 11:38:15+00:00): Hallo PT53:
Laut 
https://mobil.trk.de/portal.html?city=Rheinstetten&lang=de&theme=&lat=48.96662171367143&lng=8.303533405166164&zoom=16

Rappenwörthstraße
mit Vollsperrung

Von30.07.2020 bis 25.09.2020
Stationäre Baustelle
Vorgangskennzeichnung2020-30083
Verursacher Stadtbauamt

Achtung! Die geografische Darstellung auf dem Portal ist nicht exakt. Die S2 ist bis Ende der Sommerferien gesperrt mit Austausch von einigen Weichen wodurch auch die angrenzenden Straßen gesperrt werden. Der in Bau befindliche Kreisverkehr Rappenwörthstr / Siegelgrundstr wird wahrscheinlich erst gegen Ende September befahrbar sein so dass der KFZ-Verkehr zwischen Mörsch und Forchheim so lange über die B36 ausweichen muss.
Gruß
Garry X3D
PT-53 (2020-08-09 11:56:56+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Grüße
PT-53 (2020-10-04 09:31:42+00:00): Hallo GarryX3D, 
besteht die Baustellensperrung dort noch?
Fragende Grüße
GarryX3D (2020-10-04 10:26:45+00:00): Hallo PT53,
danke für den Hinweis, den 2. Teil des Kreisels hatte ich vergessen freizugeben.
Noch offen sind die Relation für den Bus-Verkehr wieder anzulegen.
Ansonsten ist der Bereich noch weiterhin Baustelle und noch nicht alle Wege/Parkplatz angelegt/freigegeben.
 
Gruß Garry
PT-53 (2020-10-04 10:36:15+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Grüße
eggie (2020-07-31 09:54:57+00:00): Hoi.. een nieuwe mapper is hier bezig geweest.
Het lijkt erop of het water is verdwenen uit de grachten.
Er stond ook een waarschuwing van jou denk ik op de mp..
Ik zie waterway=canal en geen natural=water op de oever. Het zijn allemaal outers in een relatie. 

Zie ook 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88673752#map=17/52.07954/4.32389
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88672738

en die is vervolgens weer teruggedraaid
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88685429

Kun jij er chocola van maken?

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-31 09:55:53+00:00): .. zelfs inners... !
multimodaal (2020-07-31 10:25:13+00:00): Hoi eggie. Bij intekenen van deze brug zag ik deze grote water-MP, heb idd waarschuwing voor niet verwijderen op de toen nog ongetagde outer gezet tegen ondoordachte "opruimacties".  Zulke MP's zie je vaker in stedelijk gebied met grachten, erfenis van 3D-shapes import.

Mijn beeld obv snelle blik tijdens de lunch geeft het beeld dat de nieuwe mapper in v10 de natural=water van de MP heeft omgezet in man+made=bridge en dat in v11 weer heeft gecorrigeerd en dat het nu weer OK is.  Zie
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/5515953
  
Rendering via osm.org loopt nog wat achter op sommige zoomlevels, maar in JOSM ziet het er bij mij weer goed uit.

Klopt het volgens jou ook weer?
Vanavond kan ik evt uitgebreider kijken indien nodig. Groet (-:
eggie (2020-07-31 10:53:52+00:00): Oke... bedankt voor het checken zover.. Denk dat het wel goed komt..  :)
Gr eggie
Rogoyski (2020-09-20 22:25:33+00:00): There may be outdoor seating but it's not a reason to move the rstaurant itself outside of the building perimeter.
a-falcon (2020-09-20 22:33:23+00:00): Omg, sorry for that, I was using a mobile editor and it looks like it has rounded the coordinates. So that wasn't even intentional, my intention was to just add the tag. Thanks for making it right again!
philippec (2021-08-04 18:02:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2786691
Diepenbeek sportcentrum tapkraantje, tuinslang, elektrische schakelaar, maar niets werkt.
Wie weet hier meer over of kan het juist taggen ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=7762690049#map=20/50.91377/5.42191
skquinn (2020-07-29 07:11:40+00:00): In the future, please try to make changeset bounding boxes no larger than necessary. The Waller area and Katy area changes could have each been submitted as separate changesets, for example. In JOSM: select the objects you want to upload, and then go to File/Upload Selection (or use the keyboard shortcut).