piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-21 10:16:43+00:00): Hi them
I'm from Mapbox and enthusiastic mapper. 
I tried to fix this problem, but it didn't work out well for me without context on the ground. I have revert my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112784036 to keep the history of the problem and to be able to better fix it.
portalaventura (2021-04-21 06:37:07+00:00): JacGracie, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de Mato Grosso mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmMT.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
G_P_J (2021-05-14 18:16:31+00:00): Proszę nie dodawać znacznika addr:city. W miejscowościach bez nazwanych ulic używamy znacznika addr:place. Wszystkie znaczniki można zobaczyć klikając po lewej stronie link "Wszystkie znaczniki"
Dimacn (2021-04-21 07:22:35+00:00): 1. Вы некорректно сдвинули здание №61, т.к. предварительно не выровняли подложку по gps трекам 2. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные имена собственные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  Пожалуйста удалите описательные названия у детских площадок. 3. Мега-Дент и хеликс это не госпитали и не больницы. Парфюм косметик - это не супермаркет. Ставьте корректные теги.
Sanniu (2021-04-29 07:37:47+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/924327558/ is not connected to 
the existing roads now. Why?
Gal Moovit (2021-04-29 07:41:45+00:00): I got multiple complaints that there is no passing there, this could be a small driveway but there is no way to get to עמק החולה from there
Sanniu (2021-04-29 07:45:23+00:00): Have you disconnected foot-path from both ends? Or it was already disconnected from the stairs?
Gal Moovit (2021-04-29 07:50:43+00:00): it was disconnected from the stairs
DD1GJ (2021-04-22 06:27:33+00:00): gelöschten Rettungspunkt 2225R05 wieder hergestellt. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3470507017/history
Buraddo (2021-04-21 10:51:52+00:00): Hello, barrier=* tags are used for gates that inhibit access. For railway crossings please use crossing:barrier tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:barrier
ezekielf (2021-05-18 15:08:10+00:00): Did you notice that this island is no longer visible due to changing natural=coastline to natural=coastline;glacier?  I suggest mapping the glacier as a separate object from the coastline
FERINA365 (2021-05-19 18:40:50+00:00): Thanks for the heads up! Will change!!!
user_5359 (2021-04-22 19:06:26+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8650027132: Is this the correct position of this node?
Russ McD (2025-01-20 12:07:48+00:00): Please don't change links across highways to the same status as the road they connect to. This is WRONG and contravenes the Wiki advice.
I will revert any I find.
IIVQ (2021-04-21 07:24:18+00:00): Hoi DvdHoven,

Ik wil de komende dagen het westelijke deel van het wandelnetwerk Amstelland invoeren, maar wil daarbij graag mijn eigen fouten oplossen, mag dat? (Zag vanmorgen een heleboel fouten en nu heb jij ze weggewerkt, terwijl ik dát juist het leukste vind) - Vind het echt niet erg dat je het gedaan heb maar voor nu wil ik het graag even doen.
dvdhoven (2021-04-21 10:45:37+00:00): Geen enkel probleem.
Ik wwet het nu en ik hjoud er verder rekening mee

Vriendelijke Groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
IIVQ (2021-04-21 21:24:53+00:00): Thx! Ik heb het hele netwerk er in zitten (heb me ff kwaadgemaakt) dus ga je gang!
gurglypipe (2021-04-21 08:17:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for your recent edits in Ambleside and Windermere. Just checking — have the traffic lights at the end of Compston Road really been removed? If so, the pedestrian crossing will probably need re-tagging. The lights were previously mapped separately because they’re not in exactly the same place as the crossing.
steggets (2021-04-21 09:44:14+00:00): At the end of Compston road there are two operationally independent traffic light controlled crossings, one for each of the two lanes. The lights for each crossing are both immediately adjacent to their crossing.
gurglypipe (2021-04-21 10:03:09+00:00): Thanks, I think the traffic lights should be mapped separately, then, one per fork of the road. :) I’ve done so in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103329763 — please edit it further if anything’s wrong with it! I haven’t been to Ambleside for a few months.

The tagging guidelines I used were https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#How_to_map_.28new.29
steggets (2021-04-21 13:01:23+00:00): That looks perfectly fine to me. Thanks for the link to the guidelines, I had looked at crossing=traffic_signals in the wiki. I hadn't looked at traffic signals as well.
Buraddo (2021-04-21 10:55:16+00:00): Hello, you can add both natural=tree and tourism=attraction to the tree, there is no problem of it having multiple classification tags.
Tiberiu Popescu (2021-04-21 11:19:39+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the tip, I updated the POI.
kawino85 (2021-11-25 13:42:39+00:00): Why have you "fixed" this data? It's obviously bogus.
ivanbranco (2021-12-30 19:31:09+00:00): Hi turankaya74,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8531658086/history

there's an invalid place value herem is it the full name? an alt_name? can you check it out please?
ivanbranco (2022-01-02 11:09:53+00:00): Hi kamataryo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8650500512/history

the tag for waterfalls is "waterway=waterfall" and should be part of a waterway
kamataryo (2022-01-05 00:17:17+00:00): Hi, ivanbranco,
Thank you for telling me it!
This waterfall is so small and has no obvious waterway. Is `Tag:tourism=viewpoint` better? How do you think?
ralley (2021-04-22 00:04:37+00:00): Way 933228563 has been tagged with layer=-1 but is not tagged as a tunnel, is it really unde rthe other features?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322520
20speechlayl (2021-04-22 07:19:28+00:00): I don't understand where it is. Could you point it out for me?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322520
ralley (2021-04-22 07:22:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/933228563#map=17/-43.47601/172.61973
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322520
20speechlayl (2021-04-22 07:36:56+00:00): Oh found it. It runs under a block of shops (i.e the footpath is placed where it should be with the shops having a roof that extends further out). I'm sorta new so unsure if this is correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322520
ralley (2021-04-22 18:56:30+00:00): Based on the LINZ aerial imagery only the SW corner of the way appears covered so if mapped this way it should be split and only the actual covered area tagged as such.  A more correct tagging is I believe to leave the way with no layer but covered=yes and tag just the overhanging portion of the buildings with building=roof and layer=1.  Alternatively don't draw a seperate way for footpaths and just add sidewalk=left|right|both on the road - much easier to maintain topology this way as well
blackboxlogic (2021-04-26 17:58:19+00:00): You've duplicated the same information onto two elements. So now it looks like there are two businesses here that happen to have the same name. Please delete the node since the building has more information and more detailed geometry.
Also, you website you added doesn't seem to represent this business.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322598
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-27 05:14:15+00:00): We are notatying per guidance from OSM user https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Zartico.

What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.
blackboxlogic (2021-04-26 18:00:27+00:00): When you copy all the information from a node to a building, please delete the node (specifically: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&node=1794437293). In this case, it looks like there is a guest_house in a guest_house?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322739
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-27 05:13:58+00:00): We are notatying per guidance from OSM user https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Zartico.

What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.
blackboxlogic (2021-04-26 18:04:33+00:00): I see now that you have made this same mistake (leaving behind duplicate business nodes) in your many many changes. Please review all your past changes and correct this issue. Here is a tool which may help you do that. https://osmcha.org/?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Riyana_Shrestha%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Riyana_Shrestha%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103322869
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-27 05:13:14+00:00): We are notatying per guidance from OSM user https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Zartico.

What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.
Zh9567 (2021-04-21 16:26:57+00:00): Hi, just wanted to let you know that this is not how you use the multipolygon relation with inner rings. This is only used when you need to trace a feature with 'hole' inside, for example this building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7226876). In your edits, those apartments area are not necessary to have a multipolygon with buildings as inner rings. Thanks.
For more information you can take a look at these: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon_Examples
blackboxlogic (2021-04-26 18:06:56+00:00): When you move information from a node to a building, please delete the node because it is redundant. The way you left it, it seems that there is a hotel inside of this hotel. Please come back and fix this. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3924638307
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103323110
AnzuM (2021-05-04 05:09:56+00:00): We are notatying per guidance from OSM user https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Zartico.
What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.

 Sorry Sorry I was replying in the mail .
blackboxlogic (2021-04-26 18:08:01+00:00): When you move information from a node to a building, please remove the node because it is redundant. The way you left this, it seems that there is a hotel inside of this hotel. Please fix this. See: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/834379011
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103323214
roshanparajuli (2021-05-04 07:51:06+00:00): We are notating per guidance from OSM user https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Zartico.

What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.
user_5359 (2021-04-25 04:39:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Keima (2021-05-28 19:33:09+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Bonne continuation,
blackboxlogic (2021-04-26 18:09:04+00:00): When you copy information from a node to a building, please delete the node because it is now redundant. The way you left this, it looks like there is a hotel inside of this hotel. Please come back and fix this. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3934303216
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103323769
AnzuM (2021-05-04 05:10:53+00:00): We are notatying per guidance from OSM user https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Zartico.
What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.

 Sorry I was replying in the mail .
nw520 (2021-04-21 10:42:53+00:00): Hallo Druck Westspangencenter, herzlichst willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank, dass dich an der Pflege der Karte beteiligst.


Bitte erlaube mir wenige kleinere Hinweise:

Zum Ändern von "Zwischen Saar und Autobahn" hast du das Segment erneut eingezeichnet. Bitte bearbeite stattdessen bereits eingezeichnete Segmente, da solche Dopplungen zu Fehlern führen.

Im Allgemeinen gilt für die Arbeit in OpenStreetMap die sog. "On-The-Ground"-Regel. Diese besagt, dass wenn es eine Diskrepanz zwischen externen Datenquellen (bspw. Grundbuch) und der Situation vor Ort gibt, letztere beim Einzeichnen zu bevorzugen ist. Ich denke mal nicht, dass eine solche Diskrepanz bei deinen Änderungen vorliegt, aber im Allgemeinen reicht ein bloßer Verweis auf amtliche Quellen nicht aus.
Ich nehme auch an, dass der Name "Zwischen Saar und Autobahn" der Straße vor Ort nicht ersichtlich ist. Persönlich bin ich da wenig pingelig, aber es kann sein, dass andere Benutzer dies hinterfragen könnten.

Ansonsten war ich mal so frei und hab die "Saarlocation" zur Baustelle umgezeichnet. Nach Abschluss des Baus bzw. nach Eröffnung kann das dann wieder auf Café zurückgestellt werden.

Beste Grüße und frohes Kartieren!
andrewwiseman (2021-08-10 17:11:45+00:00): Hi, please don't map buildings as big blobs that cover multiple buildings.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-03 10:39:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113325200 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI edits of unknown provenance where the editor has refused contact with the US community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5420 ..
fkv (2021-10-14 00:12:18+00:00): Wir dürfen keine Koordinaten aus Spelix in OSM übernehmen, und ich glaube nicht, dass in diesem Fall die Koordinaten in Spelix genauer sind als die von mir mit GPS gemessenen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-03 10:39:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113325200 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI edits of unknown provenance where the editor has refused contact with the US community.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5420 ..
eggie (2021-04-21 09:31:17+00:00): Dag Superp  
service=parking_aiosle kan hier juist wel.
covered=no is onnodig op reguliere wegen.
MVG
eggie
Superp (2021-04-21 09:42:42+00:00): Not just parking aisle, but an access road too.
eggie (2021-04-21 09:45:14+00:00): Okay.. Up to you!
Greetz,
eggie
G_P_J (2021-05-14 18:33:18+00:00): Proszę nie dodawać znacznika addr:city. W miejscowościach bez nazwanych ulic używamy znacznika addr:place. Wszystkie znaczniki można zobaczyć klikając po lewej stronie link "Wszystkie znaczniki"
aceman444 (2021-07-10 18:02:15+00:00): Zdravim, fontana Pijuce holubice je ale uplne inde v Sade Janka Krala. Opravil som, len teda dajte pozor ako to umiestnujete. Pisete, ze podla Mapbox satelit, ale tam tuto sochu ani len nie je vidiet. Tu spravnu fontanu ano.
impiaaa (2021-04-21 15:50:02+00:00): This change removes a restaurant. It has been reverted in changeset 103351615
Jrachi (2021-04-21 09:36:37+00:00): Ci sei quasi col nome!
Non usare abbreviazioni e scrivi i nomi con la sola iniziale maiuscola
Non ripetere nel nome quello che hai inserito come nota.
Ciao, Ivo
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 09:04:12+00:00): Split SEO POI details from building to node given it is occupied by other tenants, and cleaned up SEO-spammy tags for "Kofler-Dichtungen" office in changeset 184261221

https://osm.org/changeset/184261221
Moldovan_Merkator (2022-11-27 15:39:58+00:00): Dude, why you moved this riverbank if it was drawed with an offset less than 1 meter. Maxar's imagery offset in Moldova is more than 2 meters and now it looks like very bad.
bolalala (2022-12-01 11:17:12+00:00): Hi Moldovan_Merkator, MadRiverBank is no longer on the team, but I have reviewed the area and the imagery you mentioned. Thanks for pointing out the issue with alignment, I have reverted this change to the previous version of how you originally modeled it. Thanks and happy mapping!
Moldovan_Merkator (2022-12-01 14:25:47+00:00): Hello! Thanks for your response and actions!
trigpoint (2021-04-21 17:15:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Thank you for your edit however we do not have permission to copy from or use google maps.

Also when adding names to objects please use proper capitalisation, lower case looks very poor quality.

Cheers Phil
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 09:32:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105078961 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a source=google changeset in London.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103327834.
tonyf1 (2021-10-25 10:19:41+00:00): see Changeset #112939698
joost schouppe (2021-11-02 10:42:21+00:00): Op de lidar kan je duidelijk zien dat dit geen ford is: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8650849117
Maar de culvert is hier verstopt sinds de overstromingen in de zomer, dus op een manier is het nu wel een ford (als het veel regent :))
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:46:26+00:00): Fixed
tonyf1 (2021-10-25 10:15:35+00:00): reverted  Changeset #112939521
pedee1812 (2021-04-21 17:22:16+00:00): Auch hier gilt ein allgemeines Fahrverbot.
SimonPoole (2021-04-21 19:44:17+00:00): Ja das war aber bereits so seit dem 2. Januar 2013, ich habe nur das unnötige access=yes entfernt, was aber funktional keinen Unterschied macht.
Larmax (2021-04-21 17:58:26+00:00): Moi, Mechelininkadulle lisäämiäsi tägejä ei ihan käytetä tuolla tavalla. cycleway:right=track -tägi ei sovi tähän koska pyörätie on lisätty erillisenä viivana kartalle. Tämä siis kuuluisi tägätä cycleway=separate -tägillä, mutta useinmiten nämä jätetään vain tägäämättä. Ks. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway:right

bicycle:forward=use_sidepath tägissä ongelmana on, että tästä voisi olettaa, että toiseen suuntaan saisi ajaa pyörällä. En ole tuosta kuitenkaan yhtä varma, mutta pelkkä bicycle=use_sidepath olisi selkeämpi.
sutsisatsi (2021-04-21 22:18:16+00:00): Kiitos huomiosta, tuo onkin tosiaan turhaa täytettä tägilistassa. Korjailen.

Ja totta, tuo :forward on myös turha lisäys yksisuuntaisella ajoradalla, kun tässä tapauksessa pyöräily ei ole sallittua eri suuntaan.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-29 14:32:32+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3289332 ?
eggie (2021-04-21 10:11:31+00:00): Wilco.. Dit doet helemaal niets.

Een afslagbeperking  id een relatie met drie elementen
Een wegdeel -from
een node -via

Daar komt bij dat je geen afslagbeperking kunt invoeren als dit niet door borden word aangegeven.
Welke bocht kan hier niet gehaald worden door een hulpverleningsvoertuig.
Van waar via welk punt naar welk wegdeel?
eggie
een wegdeel- t
eggie (2021-04-21 10:13:30+00:00): type

een turn_restriction
from (wegdeel)
via (node)
to (wegdeel)

en dan in de relatie zelf..
restriction=  (bv) no_right_turn
type restriction
except=  de uitzondering
eggie (2021-04-21 10:25:23+00:00): Bedoel je dat je komende van de Hanzeweg via stukje Gotlandstraat niet rechtaf kunt naar de (eenrichtings) Zutphenseweg?

Er van uitgaande dat de VR app tegen het eeenrichtingsverkeer in kan..?
eggie (2021-04-21 10:33:11+00:00): en een  lang voertuig is dan de categorie hgv
eggie (2021-04-21 10:52:25+00:00): Even een in wezen onnodige algemene afslagbeperking ingevoerd.
Want in de reguliere routering zul je nooit naar rechts de Zutphenseweg worden ingestuurd.
Wellicht een hulpvoertuig wel. 
Nu dus van weddeel Gotlandstraat via node op de splitsing naar wegdeel Zutphenseweg.
restriction=no_right_turn
type=restruction
except=bicycle;mope;mofa
Wilco_VR_IJsselland (2021-04-21 12:36:42+00:00): Idd . Komende vanaf de hanzeweg de gotlandstraat in en dan gelijk rechts de zutphenseweg in
eggie (2021-04-21 12:43:17+00:00): Dan staat de afslagbeperking er nu goed in. Even geen idee of je in editor iD kunt zien hoe ik dat heb gedaan. Werk met josm.
Dus met from.via..to
maraf24 (2021-04-21 10:21:10+00:00): Proszę sobie nie robić żartów.
Zmianę cofnąłem.
impiaaa (2021-04-21 15:43:11+00:00): Please note that the "addr:street" tag must match the name of a nearby street exactly.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-23 04:17:48+00:00): In my view the "addr:street" does match the name of a nearby street. Please correct me if I am wrong, thank you.
impiaaa (2021-04-23 15:08:33+00:00): Before I had fixed it, "addr:street" was "Odin Rd", with an abbreviation. The nearby road is named "Odin Road," with no abbreviation. "addr:street" should therefore be "Odin Road" without abbreviation.
Riyana_Shrestha (2021-04-27 05:18:21+00:00): Sorry
cyel (2021-04-22 19:02:35+00:00): Bonjour DDROMAGNY,

Je viens d'annuler cette contribution. En effet, l'information contenu dans la note a déjà été décrite avec des tags et n'a donc pas lieu d'être en description. Elle avait été laissée en note car les notes sont à destinations d'autres contributeurs au cas où  d'autres contributeurs souhaitent continuer à contribuer pour décrire encore plus ce panneau de direction.

Cordialement,

cyel
ScottWalkerAU (2021-04-22 03:40:21+00:00): Pedestrian area looks good now - I fixed up the crossings at NE roundabout in 103372947
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103330559
Jose Luis Infante (2021-04-21 12:34:28+00:00): Hola,
gràcies per la teva edició. Només una questió. Moure un vèrtex geodèsic és una mica estrany, ja que es mapeja el punt on està situat la marca o senyalització (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurvey_point), que pot no correspondre al cim del turó. Aquests punts es van importar del IGN i es suposa que qui millor que ells per saber on tenen les seves marques, però també es considera molt el coneixement local del terreny. Aleshores, el senyal del punt geodèsic s'ha mogut realment?
Salutacions!