piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:13:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Linhares (2017-04-12 13:08:39+00:00): Olá, Anders, você retirou a tag place=worship de duas igrejas. Era isso mesmo que você queria fazer?
Andersperes (2017-04-12 18:03:54+00:00): Corrigido.
Obrigado!
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:12:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
BCNorwich (2017-04-12 06:21:28+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think you have placed this node incorrectly. Guest house in middle of road, different street? Just ask if you need help. Regards
BCNorwich (2017-04-29 10:59:32+00:00): No response so node removed
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:11:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
FTA (2017-04-30 03:42:15+00:00): Hi, is there a reason you deleted so many buildings in Lubbock? Did you perhaps leave your computer logged in somewhere?
Best,
Ethan aka FTA
aboges26 (2018-03-19 03:29:13+00:00): I deleted them because I drew them.
Allroads (2017-04-13 18:19:03+00:00): A node is deleted with important wheelchair tagging.

The hotel was on a node, this is good, no need to change.
usaf8 (2017-04-13 21:24:17+00:00): ok
usaf8 (2017-04-13 21:25:04+00:00): add the node with the wheelchair
Allroads (2017-04-14 08:40:14+00:00): I do not see your add, when i give a hint that somethings wrong I expect the problem is solved by the man/woman  who makes it. Learn from there mistake, like I did to. Read search how to solve it. Before they do new thinks.

And do not use in the Netherlands BING, too old, there is a better imagery Luchtfoto ortho actueel.
usaf8 (2017-04-14 23:47:26+00:00): where was the wheelchair?
Allroads (2017-04-15 09:26:24+00:00): on the hotel node.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
escada (2017-04-12 09:16:58+00:00): Hallo,

would it be possible to use correct changeset comments to indicate what you changed and which sources you used ? You modified a hotel, but the changeset says "details classification of residential streets realigment" which does not match.

Thanks & happy mapping
usaf8 (2017-04-12 12:52:28+00:00): the minor details of the changes made in by contributors are registered throught the changeset and you can see them in the changeset. the changes in the hotel are very minor changes that doesn't need comment. go through the changeset and and see if there is a problem with the changes i made in the hotel. i don't think there is a problem, because it is a clear improvement. if you think you can improve it even more, feel free to do so, anytime. thank you
escada (2017-04-13 10:57:35+00:00): It's just a matter of politeness towards the other mappers. OpenStreetMap is a project that puts a lot of emphasis on the community of mappers. Hence, we ask people to put some effort in communicating with others. Good changeset descriptions is one of them. Using the same description over and over, although you clearly started mapping different such is bad practice.

I did not say your change is bad, only that the comment ("details classification of residential streets realigment") clearly does not cover changes to a hotel. It would have been better to write something "changes to hotel groundplan based on Bing" or something like that. 

But since you ask for it, why did you change the layout of the building ? All buildings in the Netherlands were imported and it is doubtful that you can improve the plan of the building by looking at old Bing imagery.

happy mapping
usaf8 (2017-04-13 11:11:07+00:00): well, as you can see, the layout of the building was wrong and needed correction."All buildings in the Netherlands were imported"?  that means that the source of the imported building is wrong and should be dismissed
escada (2017-04-14 03:03:30+00:00): In general it is a bad idea to make changes to existing data based on Bing alone. The imagery from Bing is pretty old and a lot of things have changed in the meantime. On the Dutch forum you can find information about using imagery from Cyclomedia, which is more recent and offers more detail.

Also, you can only trace the roof based on Bing (or any other aerial imagery), it is possible that the base of the building is imported via BAG. The latter is preferable.

I was informed by other mappers that you did not change the plan but that you might have accidentally deleted some wheelchair information.
usaf8 (2017-04-14 23:59:24+00:00): well, if you think the layout can be even more perfect, feel free to make it more perfect yourself. i use osm id and i'm fine with it. there are hundreds of thousands of contributors using many other imagery and will eventually perfect everyone else's edits. that's the way a collaborative project like wikipedia or osm works.
escada (2017-04-15 10:16:10+00:00): Since you are new, I thought you could appreciate some advice, apparently not. 
I will leave you alone and hope you don't break to much that is currently mapped.
woodpeck (2017-04-19 13:49:07+00:00): You appear to have deleted a lot of data in this and other nearby changesets. May I ask why?
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
franta prochazka (2017-04-12 02:49:03+00:00): For some reason, my edits are not becoming part of the open street map. Can somebody explain why?
mvexel (2017-04-12 04:41:16+00:00): Hi! Your trail is in the OpenStreetMap database, but some things are not displayed on the main map, only on specialized maps that use OSM data. Nordic / XC trails are among those specialized things that don't appear on the main map. You can see your trail for example on OpenSnowMap: http://www.opensnowmap.org/?zoom=15&lat=45.31237&lon=-121.62466&layers=snowbase&marker=false For more information, check here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Winter_sports
Alecs01 (2017-04-12 18:26:12+00:00): Hi, you deleted a few telephones here and there in this changeset and before, are you sure they no longer exist?
Supaplex (2017-05-12 08:43:55+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
MCDA (2017-04-12 14:21:57+00:00): Why did you change the maxspeed tag from 60 mph to 40 ?
chnav (2017-04-13 15:11:46+00:00): Hi, you continue delete data and draw new buildings on cleared space. it is not the way we do in OSM, e.g you have deleted different parts of building and lost university tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160785438/history

I revert this buuilding and will report DWG immediately.
chnav (2017-04-13 16:33:28+00:00): Please note my complain not about that hundred duplicated houses but university building on above link.
PT-53 (2017-04-12 08:11:09+00:00): Bezüglich name:
Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47682117#map=19/48.06309/9.61737
SafwatHalaby (2017-04-12 13:23:07+00:00): Hello :)
I see you've created an area with "building=yes" and put a node inside it with "leisure=fitness_centre". Usually you don't need the node inside it. The area itself can be marked with "leisure=fitness_centre" instead.
PT-53 (2017-04-12 08:03:42+00:00): Hallo klaus555,
Du hast beim Freibad in Bad Buchau einen WoMob-Parkplatz eingezeichnet. Soweit gut. Dieser WoMob-Parktplatz hat aber keinen Eigennamen "Wohnmobilstellplatz am Freibad" .
Wiki-Auszug: name ist nur der Name
Die Namen sollten nur den eigentlichen Namen des fraglichen Objekts enthalten und keine Kategorien / Typen, Beschreibungen, Adressen oder Anmerkungen enthalten. Jegliche über den Namen hinausgehenden Informationen sollten in gesonderten Tags (siehe unter anderem vorstehende Links) eingetragen werden, um ihre Bedeutungen zum Ausdruck zu bringen. (Link: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names)
Stalker61 (2017-04-13 03:47:58+00:00): Не трогайте статусную часть автодороги. Для этого необходимо обладать хотя бы минимальными знаниями о правилах тегирования!
Stalker61 (2017-04-13 03:48:31+00:00): Не трогайте статусную часть автодороги. Для этого необходимо обладать хотя бы минимальными знаниями о правилах тегирования!
IvanMurza (2017-04-14 05:21:20+00:00): ОК. Но по этой дороге не проехать! Там стоит пост и только спецтранспорт может там ездить. Это дорога по аганскому меторождению
Stalker61 (2017-04-16 04:07:43+00:00): Укажите точку КПП (шлагбаум) на автодороге
IvanMurza (2017-04-18 05:15:38+00:00): В конце месторождения (примерно середина дороги) нефтяники положили плиты, чтобы дороги как таковой не было... При личном посещении постараюсь отметить где точно они лежат
eggie (2017-04-12 07:01:02+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-12 07:04:52+00:00): Ik heb het (park) bankje verwijderd van woning nummer 4. Wat was je bedoeling?
SomeoneElse (2017-04-17 10:50:47+00:00): Hello,
You've tagged a cycleway here as "highway=Cykelväg".  In order for everyone to be able to understand the data, you'll want to change this to "highway=cycleway.
Best Regards,
Andy
GinaroZ (2017-04-12 12:10:07+00:00): I've split the road and added a pedestrian street in the middle
rarad74 (2017-04-12 09:11:11+00:00): Hello. Internal area is a court not a building. I corrected the building shape.
I recommend you to use Mapbox imagery because are better positioned than Bing...
highflyer74 (2017-04-12 11:52:11+00:00): Hallo!

Bitte update Deine App auf die aktuelle Version. Mit StreetComplete gibt es teilweise Probleme. Nachlesen kannst Du dies hier:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Danke!
Hjart (2017-04-12 07:14:59+00:00): Skoven var i forvejen både korrekt tagget og navngivet (se https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4649144), så jeg tillader mig at slette dette igen.
imagico (2017-04-12 12:07:11+00:00): Hello Jenny,

why do you think 4rch drew the coastline you tried to 'align' here the way he did in

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35508175

If you think that mapping was faulty it would be a good idea to actually talk the mapper who did this first, especially if - like here - this is an experienced mapper who has drawn hundreds of kilometers of coastline in the area.

Hint: if you'd actually look at the image sources JOSM offers you for the area you map in you might also find images that are a decent depiction of reality.
Jenny Johal (2017-04-14 23:48:38+00:00): Hi Imagico,
Sorry about that. Hopefully it looks better now.
gileri (2017-04-25 19:16:15+00:00): Bonjour,

Les points ayant le tag wheelchair et addr:housenumber sont-ils des entrées de bâtiment ?

Dans ce cas il faudrait utiliser les tags entrance=main ou entrance=yes, car dans l'état le tag wheelchair n'a que peu de sens
Alexis Fossart (2017-04-25 20:41:27+00:00): Vu que j'ajoute ces informations pour aider dans un projet universitaire je n'avais pas pensé à ajouter le tag entrance pour les entrées de bâtiment. Merci de l'avoir fait remarqué.
gileri (2017-04-26 20:30:03+00:00): Pas de problème! 

C'est un projet pour cartographier l’accessibilité du campus ? Si c'est une initiative "ouverte", ça pourrait interesser des gens sur la mailing-list lyonnaise : 
http://listes.openstreetmap.fr/wws/arc/local-lyon
stadt-koeln-tillmann (2018-06-25 06:54:59+00:00): Hallo redrace,
in dem Änderungssatz wurde die Fußgängerzone in Brühl in highway=service verändert. Das führt zu einer falschen Darstellung. Ich kann die Motivation erahnen, verstehe sie aber nicht vollends. Jedenfalls würde ich gerne als Hauptnutzung wieder highway= pedestrian definiert haben und die Nebennutzung delivery und service gerne anderweitig unterbringen. Können wir das hinbekommen, ohne Deine Intention zu beinträchtigen? Über einen kreativen Umgang mit der Problematik würde ich mich freuen. Freundliche Grüße aus Köln!
Robert
redrace (2018-06-25 07:04:34+00:00): Hallo Robert
In "note" steht: Workaround, um area nicht zerstören zu müssen und trotzdem die Radroute abzubilden. Wir können aus dem "service" gerne ein "pedestrian" machen wenndie Relationen und Nutzungen davon unbeeindruckt bleiben.
Schöne Grüße aus Wesseling
Meik
redrace (2018-06-25 07:05:57+00:00): Die Fußgängerzone ansich ist ja als "pedestrian" und area0yes getaggt.
stadt-koeln-tillmann (2018-06-25 07:17:44+00:00): @ 2. Kommentar: Ja, die Fläche, aber das Linienelement ist primär falsch und führt zu einer falschen Darstellung.
@ 1. Kommentar: Gerne.
Kann ich ändern oder möchtest Du selbst?
Robert
redrace (2018-06-25 15:04:38+00:00): HUHU
Dir ist es aufegfallen dann änderst Du es auch! Selber schuld! :-)

Schöne Grüße
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:22:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
rab (2017-04-12 16:20:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=%20Easygrant%20Investments%20P%2FL#map=19/-17.74912/31.04339
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Hjart (2017-04-12 07:52:53+00:00): You misplaced this one. I have corrected though: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47684569
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:11:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:21:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
GideonJT (2017-04-30 19:28:17+00:00): Не стоит добавлять воображаемые объекты на основную карту, для этого существуют персонализированные карты Google, например.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
CloCkWeRX (2017-04-15 01:12:06+00:00): Nice work! If there's a particular area you'd like to flesh out a bit, more than happy to help (particularly roads with shops/other POI on them) - have done a bit around Glenside for example.
Supaplex (2017-05-12 08:44:18+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
stephan75 (2017-04-12 19:42:03+00:00): Hallo OSMaker,

die Einhorn-Apotheke in Lüneburg war bereits eingetragen als einzelner Punkt, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/387282070

Es Kann aber sein, dass die Standard-Ansicht auf openstreetmap.org dies so nicht ohne weiteres angezeigt hat.

Magst du deinen Eintrag auf dem Gebäude-Umriss wieder rückgängig machen?
literan (2017-04-12 10:55:14+00:00): не надо спамить тегами в название. Блокировки хотите?
Hjart (2017-04-12 08:10:35+00:00): Hvorfor tilføje "lanes=0" på Spentrup Alle (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4874079)? Det giver jo ingen mening.
Robotron3000 (2017-04-12 17:40:40+00:00): fordi jeg ramte forkert på det numeriske tastatur... 
1 var det meningen der skulle stå...
Hjart (2017-04-12 17:53:01+00:00): Ok, det kan jo ske :-)
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
eggie (2017-04-12 14:09:00+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-12 14:14:43+00:00): Kevin.. Je voetpaden zitten overal aan vastgeplakt. Dat is niet de bedoeling. Ik zal ze loshalen van de landuse. Wanneer je vragen hebt kun je reageren.
eggie (2017-04-12 14:15:35+00:00): Ook horen paden niet over elkaar heen te lopen zonder verbindingsnode. Anders gaat routeren echt niet lukken.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 20:54:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52080791 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/large scale modification of bus stops in Nuremberg by Marsuna. Revert undiscussed import of external references and test edits by mappedit. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.