piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Violaine_Do (2021-05-16 21:57:37+00:00): Iaorana, on ne met pas d'informations personnelle dans la base, qui plus est vous avez dessiné un batiment par dessus un autre. OSM est un bien commun, merci d'en respecter les bonnes pratiques.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101078058
RicoElectrico (2021-03-16 09:10:30+00:00): Hej, świetlica to chyba amenity=community_centre.
kubahahaha (2021-03-16 13:30:49+00:00): Racja, poprawiłem
Violaine_Do (2021-05-16 22:04:03+00:00): Iaorana, merci de mettre un commentaire de changeset qui décrive les modifications faites, et ne pas mélanger noms et types. OSM est un bien commun qui a de bonnes pratiques, merci de les respecter (ou corriger à posteriori au moins).https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101078271
kapazao (2021-03-16 09:52:22+00:00): Hola, para añadir edificios sería mejor si usas la capa Catastro Spain. Los dibujas con esa capa, que también indica alturas y otros datos sobre los edificios, y luego ajustas la base del edificio según imágenes PNOA.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101078675
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-21 23:00:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105114436 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of HOT edits that don't seem to match reality at all.  Many already reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-21 23:00:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105114436 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of HOT edits that don't seem to match reality at all.  Many already reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-21 23:00:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105114436 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of HOT edits that don't seem to match reality at all.  Many already reverted.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2021-10-28 06:24:12+00:00): right turn is allowed from main street to Moreland. 
Sources: Satellite view and personal observation
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2021-10-28 06:26:38+00:00): This is to allow for left turn onto Springdale
Allison P (2021-03-15 23:52:39+00:00): 10 buildings, 247 nodes. This is what I hate about Eagle.
GinaroZ (2021-03-18 23:58:10+00:00): Think this track and path are duplicates? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917623432
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635420680
Also, if you are using Bing imagery please align it with the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay or use offset 1.5,-2.6 in this area. Otherwise you're going to be mapping out of alignment with the current OSM data.
andrum99 (2021-03-19 00:08:09+00:00): They're not duplicates - there's a footpath with a sort of cobbled track immediately adjacent to it which leads to a slipway.

Thank you for the tip on map alignments. Is there a forum somewhere I can discuss such issues?
GinaroZ (2021-03-19 15:43:05+00:00): There's the talk-gb mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb (there's a talk-scotland one as well but it's not exactly active).
Also the OSM forum and help sites listed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/help
andrum99 (2021-03-19 15:51:32+00:00): Thanks 👍
Flynn Marquardt (2021-03-17 06:18:51+00:00): Hello,
your last change created multiple borders in the same area, e.g.: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/304716#map=13/32.6246/78.5960

This creates an irregular border that e.g. cannot be used for reverse geocoding.

Can you please fix that? You may use the verification button in JOSM for testing, whether the border is without errors.
Recoil16 (2021-03-18 16:20:17+00:00): Did you obtain permission from Nav Canada to use their materials? Nav Canada's aerodrome charts are copyrighted materials which generally cannot be used for OSM.
Nic727 (2021-03-18 21:17:41+00:00): Well... since it’s a public document I thought I could follow some indications, but you may be right. Do I remove everything I’ve done?
dgitto (2021-03-16 11:12:01+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM.
Non esiste il tag "emergency=IDRANTE".
Guarda sul wiki.
Un idrante si mapperebbe con 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aemergency%3Dfire_hydrant
Joel Amos (2021-03-16 02:33:35+00:00): Heyo, thanks for contributing, and welcome to OSM! I saw you requested a review, so I figured I've take a look. The main thing that stuck out was that your phone numbers are missing a country code (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone). Not a biggie. Cheers!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101080148
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Alex_Mapper (2021-03-16 01:41:29+00:00): Hey, i was looking into your changeset and it looks like you removed the information on a two existing hospitals, on one you moved the information to a parking lot and on the other i can't see where you moved the information into. 

Can you explain what your modification is supposed to be?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101080747
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Alex_Mapper (2021-03-16 03:09:30+00:00): Hey, 

If this way is private (and has no name) it should be highway=service and noname=yes 

We shouldn't use google maps nor bing for map data, if you can confirm that this road has no name then modify it as such, otherwise revert the name to what it was and add a fixme tag

Next time put that note you wrote on the "name" tag on a fixme or note tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101082563
TomPar (2021-03-16 03:03:48+00:00): Forgot to add a source: https://harvardforest.fas.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/PH-Trails-Roads-17.pdf
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-06 16:08:52+00:00): why you changed this road and many others to track? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/889964805/history
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-06 16:09:03+00:00): this is not a track road.
NicoVargas (2022-06-06 17:06:45+00:00): Estimado @erickdeoliveiraleal. Las guías para mapear en Colombia desaconsejan el uso de la etiqueta highway=unclassified 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear#V.C3.ADas_desconocidas

Conozco en persona el lugar de mapeo, y dichas carreteras corresponden al tipo Track: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack

Muchas gracias por tus aportes. Saludos!
Supaplex (2021-03-16 06:44:47+00:00): 不好意思，無基石的敘述應當放在 description，而不是中文名稱 name:zh
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101083353
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:04:51+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
Supaplex (2021-03-16 06:38:43+00:00): 如果橋不是整個加蓋在上面，要切窄軌鐵路線段
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101090582
eserte (2021-03-20 19:41:26+00:00): Es gibt keine Radspuren in der Modersohnstraße und Gärtnerstraße.
nightmw (2021-03-29 20:32:46+00:00): wollte lediglich eintragen, dass man die strecke mit dem rad befahren kann. Ich habe die radmarkierungen nun entfernt. Danke!
eserte (2021-03-29 20:45:09+00:00): Da ist noch was im südlichen Abschnitt übriggeblieben, sieht man auf CyclOSM gut. (Ich würde es auch entfernen, aber gerade scheint der iD-Editor zu streiken)
Aglis IRM-ED (2021-03-18 02:43:20+00:00): Hi mani_sh5. I changed the classification and geometry  of this way (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/917677850) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou
mani_sh5 (2022-04-18 11:25:15+00:00): "Hi Aglis IRM-ED,
Trust you are well, Thanks for reviewing the data. We will make sure to follow the update for rest of the scenarios.
"
Thank you!
mani_sh5
tobji (2021-03-16 06:44:38+00:00): Based on the signs posted at the pharmacy counter.

Pharmacy hours:
Mo-Fr 9-9
Sa 9-6
Su 10-6
Pharmacy lunch break:
1:30-2:30

Store hours:
Mo-Fr 7-9 [crudely corrected with a marker to 8-9]
Sa 8-9
Su 9-8
skquinn (2021-07-19 16:53:28+00:00): Hi,

Regarding turn restriction relations 12451383 and 12451384 (East Rogers Street near North Freeway Frontage Road), it makes much more sense to simply split the service road and make it one way southbound (as I have done) as the two sections of East Rogers Street are the only way to access that service road and wind up northbound. I'm seeing a lot of mappers do this and it seems like most if not all of them are Amazon mappers.
sailajc (2021-07-20 10:25:26+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing inputs. We add directions only when the street signs and lane markings are clear enough for us to add. In this scenario I have added restrictions because there are no one way signboards and lane markings to conclude it as oneway. Hence added turn restrictions to restrict vehicles entering into that road. 
Thanks again for sharing your inputs. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
sailajc
ottwiz (2021-03-16 18:20:57+00:00): Erste bank nincsen, megnéztem
aceman444 (2026-05-09 18:38:40+00:00): Preco by na mtb traily mali mat pristup chodci? Podla znaciek na mieste su tam chodci zakazani.
eggie (2021-03-16 07:44:31+00:00): Dag SageCloud,
Je vraagt om feedback.. 
Lijkt mij oke..
Het laatste stukje Zalmsteeg kun je ook omtaggen naar highway=service
oneway=no hoeft niet op reguliere wegen.

MVG
eggie
Sanniu (2021-03-16 14:26:39+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM. Please give you changests a meaningful name, like: "Added houses and roads in Nir Tzi"
aharvey (2021-08-03 02:15:39+00:00): Hi the shared path you added at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917699708 is overlapping the road which is incorrect. I've moved it to be adjacent from the road if you wanted to have a look and make sure it's correct? Otherwise some photos of what's there would help.
user_2066394 (2021-03-16 12:00:05+00:00): Warum gelöscht und neu erstellt?
citro (2021-03-16 12:07:27+00:00): Stimmt, ich wusste mir keinen Rat. Ich habe den POI an die richtige Stelle verschoben, aber in OsmAnd mit Live-Updates wurde er mir an der alten und neuen Stelle angezeigt. Das Problem besteht leider immer noch.
gscholz (2021-03-17 05:25:21+00:00): Hi Lorenzo,
thanks for your fast response. Your solution looks OK for me. Just for curiosity, how do you monitor the error level of your studends? Do you use any quality assurance tools? Do you teach your students about what a changeset comment is and how to deal with it?
Guido
gscholz (2021-03-17 05:37:46+00:00): Hi Lorenzo,
is this changeset a part of your project as well?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101141296

Guido
LorenzoStucchi (2021-03-17 07:50:41+00:00): Hi,
We use OSMCha, and we check the edits in JOSM once by once using its validator.
I check yesterday afternoon, and there were no major errors. The one that you see is from yesterday evening.
I will check and notify the error of the user.
Thanks again :)
Best,
Lorenzo
sorcrosc (2021-03-28 14:10:56+00:00): Ciao. Via Berlinguer l'ho ripristinato perché sembra la via di si chiami così.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=HaWculxwAvA5QPvnpK5eoA&lat=43.23271820997243&lng=13.602287065488554&z=16.64085359878859&x=0.28648856671692347&y=0.4269561671468231&zoom=1.7578125

Per Via De Gasperi hai una fonte per l'aggiunta del nome?
airon90 (2021-03-28 20:03:57+00:00): Ciao, ho riletto wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions e credo di aver mal interpretato un suo passaggio. Reverta per favore (dato che non so come revertare) quindi anche Via De Gasperi. Grazie al cielo ho modificato nomi di vie solamente qui. Scusa e grazie!
Alecs01 (2021-03-28 21:49:44+00:00): Ciao, se quelle strade sono intitolate ad Enrico Berlinguer e Alcide De Gasperi, è corretto mettere il nome per esteso, anche se il cartello stradale non lo riporta. E' uno dei punti delle linee guida di Istat riportati in quella pagina della wiki (pag 24 di questo documento https://www.agenziaentrate.gov.it/portale/documents/20143/266134/Informativa+Istat_Istruzioni+ordinamento+ecografico.pdf/c7cd141f-4acb-cf5a-42b3-04ade2c69474)
sorcrosc (2021-03-28 23:20:53+00:00): Non lo sappiamo se le strade sono intitolate a Enrico Berlinguer e Alcide De Gasperi.
Comunque quelle sono solo linee guida. Vorrei conoscere almeno una fonte, che sia un cartello stradale, una delibera del comune o qualcuno che usa questi nomi prima di cambiarli. In ogni caso i nomi attuali sono validi e non vanno eliminati ma eventualmente spostati in short_name.
Ciao
totera (2021-03-29 08:45:39+00:00): Dallo stradario dell'Agenzia delle Entrate (https://www.agenziaentrate.gov.it/portale/web/guest/schede/fabbricatiterreni/aggiornamento-catasto-fabbricati-docfa/software-docfa-4004) risultano Via Enrico Berlinguer e Rione Alcide De Gasperi
rising-mistake (2021-03-16 13:23:49+00:00): Thanks for this, I thought I'd fixed any self intersections I'd added but evidently not. I'll try and be more careful in the future!
marc__marc (2021-03-16 09:24:04+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
Merci pour votre contribution.
Lors qu'un local change de destinataire, il suffit de renseigner le nouvel occupant à la place de l'ancien. c'est beaucoup plus lisible pour l'historique comparer à effacer l'ancien et recréer un nouveau.
Cordialement,
Marc
audtr (2023-06-24 12:55:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3734605
habi (2021-03-16 10:20:40+00:00): Hey!
Hast du die Korrekturen im Zusammenhang mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2581023 gemacht, oder hast sogar du die Notiz gemacht?
Gruss,
habi
orycteropus1 (2021-03-16 11:42:59+00:00): Ja, habe ich. Habe ich Mist gebaut?

Betreffend Kategorisierung usw. der Wege habe ich allerdings keine Änderungen gemacht. JOSM gab eine Warnung, dass der Weg als "unpaved", aber als  "tracktype=grade1" (also asphaltiert) gekennzeichnet ist. (Zudem müsste man anschauen, ob das kurze "Track"-Zwischenstück zwischen den beiden unclassified-Stücken nicht eher auch unclassified sein sollte.)

Gruss
christian
habi (2021-03-16 17:09:01+00:00): Überhaupt kein Mist!
Ich hab' nur nicht genau verstanden, was du in der Notiz als Problem gemeldet wurde :)
Mit deiner Erklärung ist es klar und braucht wohl mal ein Velofährtli dorthin.
Schöne Abe,
habi
orycteropus1 (2021-03-16 17:22:40+00:00): Gut!
Au schöne Abe
christian
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:56:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:55:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
eggie (2021-03-16 09:20:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-03-16 09:14:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback.. Alle adressen zijn import vanuit de BAG en horen als node op het gebouw te liggen. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek taggen svp. Ik pas wat aan. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-03-16 10:21:35+00:00): tip.. Beetje in en uitzoomen en paar keer ctrl-F5.. cache leegmaken.
mvg
eggie
Vinber-Pro (2021-03-17 12:45:34+00:00): Yep, un test osmose :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101105270
Dawid2849 (2021-03-18 20:16:23+00:00): Cześć. Mam drobne pytanie. Czy ta ulica powinna być jako jednokierunkowa?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41565037/
Tomasz Rmn (2021-03-18 20:35:20+00:00): Jest to droga dwukierunkowa, rozdzielona linią ciągłą. 
Można powiedzieć, że jest to droga główna na tym osiedlu, bo wszystkie inne są bardzo wąskie przez parkujące tam samochody.
Dawid2849 (2021-03-18 20:38:42+00:00): W takim razie trzeba usunąć oneway=yes.
Tomasz Rmn (2021-03-18 21:09:41+00:00): Mam pytanie. Jeśli pewna droga na tym osiedlu jest oficjalnie dwukierunkowa, ale w rzeczywistości jest ona zwężona do jednego pasa ruchu przez parkujące na niej pojazdy; to czy mogę ją zmienić na drogę jednokierunkową? Uważam, że mogło by być to pomocne dla kierowców korzystających z nawigacji, bo nie musieli by oni wycofywać samochodu by wyminąć się z samochodami jadącymi z naprzeciwka po prawidłowej stronie drogi.
maraf24 (2021-03-18 22:04:32+00:00): To nadal droga dwukierunkowa, na takiej drodze bez problemu wyminą się rowerzyści, a także rowerzysta i samochód.
Można dodać lanes=1 by zaznaczyć problemy z przejazdem dwukierunkowym dla samochodów.
TravGW (2021-03-16 14:34:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. There is no secret military base in the middle of a park. Please not make fictional edits. You also moved several nodes out of place.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:55:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:55:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
abakus_uploader (2021-03-16 23:31:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Vinber (2021-03-16 09:38:48+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenu,
cependant quelques retours :
- votre commentaire n'explique pas ce que vous avez fait, ce qui est le rôle du commentaire
- vous semblez être une classe de SNT, pouvez vous rapeller les bonnes pratiques ici à votre enseignant (https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/Les-bonnes-pratiques-pour)
- tour effeil si c'est sérieux, il manque les majuscule à tour et à effeil, voire une faute d'orthographe également ?

Bonne cartographie
Vinber (2021-03-16 09:40:06+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez ajouté votre lycée, vos collègues aussi, vous avez mis le lycée sur la route de Paris (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/917730740#map=19/43.73840/1.37349).
Peut-être que vous pouvez demander à votre enseignant les bonnes pratiques ?
Bonne journée
Vinber (2021-03-16 09:41:52+00:00): Bonjour,
cela semble être des données privées sans explication de ce que vous avez ajouté.
Vous avez également touché le bar le gué des moines, est-ce voulu ?
bonne cartographie
amadvance (2021-03-16 21:20:40+00:00): Ciao Ramon,

Ho visto che hai aggiunto il nome "Uccellaia 2" ad un sentiero. Ma quello è il nome dato da chi utilizza le MTB, ed infatti era già presente come mtb:name. Metterlo come nome principale non è corretto in quanto non è un nome ufficiale del sentiero.

Sarebbe meglio toglierlo. Ci pensi tu ?

Ciao,
Andrea
Ramon Cerrano (2021-03-17 06:36:19+00:00): 👍🏻
Ramon Cerrano (2021-03-17 06:52:10+00:00): sai anche perché in quello vicino, nel tratto finale cè "non usare"?
amadvance (2021-03-17 07:05:13+00:00): Riguardo il "non usare" non lo so. Ma hai fatto bene a toglierlo. Se c'è una ragione per non usarlo andrebbe spiegato in una nota eventualmente marcandolo con gli attributi access per indicare chi non dovrebbe usarlo.
Ramon Cerrano (2021-03-17 07:15:15+00:00): È alla fine di quello nuovo che è stato aperto che si prende in mezzo al radici, tra il genestaro e l’uccellaia 2. Ha proprio come nome “non usare”.