piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
freebeer (2019-06-02 17:33:38+00:00): CAPITALISATION IS IRRELEVANT, SEEN BY OSM AS VIEWING MARKETING DRIVEL THAT IS LIKE YELLING AT YOU AS LOUD AS POSSIBLE.  (like what the wireless adverts i hear hourly have become, shhhh)

osm follows a style guide like plenty of publications that reject ever more firms wanting to appear in ALL CAPS on osm.

Note BMW nearby.  that is obviously an acronym of the bavarian company that can be spelled out in full.

Mini is too ambiguous, like some people will think of MAN, another german motor company that can be written out in full.

Does M.I.N.I. mean anything?  if so, write it out in full as osm does not use abbreviations.  if it is short for miniature, it has established itself as much as radar is a common word and it should not be capitalised in osm past the first letter.

osm does not care about self-inflicted style in general as that is for marketers.  osm does respect such case-isms as `dm' the drogerie chain to differentiate from the `DM' that used to be used for payment there, but not ALDI or more correctly AlDi, that also being a spoken word as implied by the case of Aldi.  Same with Mini.  I don't know how fans refer to MAN, man, and caps are a hint to spoken software what to do with the letters

dunno why i'm flying off the handle at this so much.

but just to be sure, i checked and wikipaedia refers to the all-caps as an own stylisation, and then uses `Mini' in every following reference, and does not list anything to suggest as any possible expansion, backronym or otherwise.

i better stop and do something else now.  like wonder what that icon i've not seen before is and what it meant to be.

sorry.
4004 (2019-06-02 18:50:09+00:00): your arguments are precisely why MINI is in alt_name and not in name.
yet as I said, I don't care much if this is removed
BrackoNe (2019-06-02 18:55:57+00:00): Personally, I agree with freebeer.

It might make issues in search algorithm (not talking about my developers now, because we have found cases like this), because algorithm may think it is aronym - like NASA.
We are here at your disposal and just want to fix potential issues.

I will remove this alt_name.

Thank you both for clarification.

Very Best Regards,
Nemanja
RicoElectrico (2019-01-17 21:31:58+00:00): Hej, to mi nie wygląda na park. To po prostu trawnik.
literan (2019-01-18 16:07:39+00:00): что-то вы тут накосячили, дом пересекается со своей же частью плюс треугольные выступы https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29854177/history - сами исправите?
literan (2019-01-22 07:23:23+00:00): что ж, тогда откачу
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-28 17:09:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 66708504, 66712182 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppet vandalism of a primarily Italian data troll.  For more info see the links from https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2483
b-jazz (2019-01-21 18:27:03+00:00): I'm seeing several errors in your imports where a way will double back on itself. For instance: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664255445. JOSM *should* be indicating this is an error if you use validation.
Alecs01 (2019-01-18 16:37:02+00:00): Please avoid such mass spelling corrections (Comunale > comunale, and other modifications you made elsewhere). There is no value added here, and unless you know every language in the world, the risk is introducing more mistakes.
mueschel (2019-01-21 11:42:05+00:00): Hallo,
bitte achte auf die korrekte Schreibweise von Keys - ich habe hier gerade 6 verschiedene Versionen von "cycleway" korrigiert.

Gruß, Jan
mariotomo (2021-08-11 19:58:53+00:00): hola. what are these things? bing only shows trees in the area? who's in charge of reviewing this project?
eggie (2019-01-17 22:36:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-01-17 22:38:44+00:00): Wonderlijk.. name=Playground Hordaland.. Een speelplaats heeft mestal geen naam en zeker geen Engelse. 
Playground Osloplein hoort ook niet in OSM thuis. Beter die naam verwijderen.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2019-01-17 22:50:21+00:00): Dag tprnl,
Graag name=Playground Daktoaweg verwijderen. Dat hoort niet op de kaart thuis. Je kunt wel onder description= "speelplaats Dakotaweg" kwijt.
Je ziet aan het symbool al dat het om een speeltuintje gaat. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2019-01-18 08:45:48+00:00): name=Playground Daktoaweg (typo ) omgezet in description=Speeltuintje Dakotaweg.
Zou je nog even naar je andere edits willen kijken?
MVG,
Eggie
aixbrick (2019-01-23 13:56:13+00:00): Hallo,
gleiches Problem wie damals in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64339144. Einfache Ways dürfen nicht Teil eines MP sein. Bitte korrigiere das.
Und nochmal der Ratschlag aus https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63878219: Bitte update JOSM mal auf eine aktuelle Version.
Gruß
RicoElectrico (2019-01-18 06:14:59+00:00): Cześć, 

Nie ma potrzeby dawać nazwy obiektom, jeśli nie są to nazwy własne. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw.C4.85

Druga rzecz: Gdy wysyłasz zmiany, upewnij się, że ich opis ma sens, bo tutaj to kalka poprzedniego. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments

Dziękuję i życzę miłego mapowania ;)
eggie (2019-01-17 22:39:32+00:00): Idem.. "Playground" is niet de naam van een speelplaatsje.
eggie (2019-01-18 21:15:17+00:00): nametags omgezet naar descripton=
Glassman (2019-01-17 23:32:12+00:00): Tip: You can square the building outline by selecting the outline then just type an "s" - it will look much improved. Do you need help?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66409828
Rasterfarian89 (2019-05-20 20:22:11+00:00): Fixing an incorrect name placed on building. Please refrain for corrupting the data by adding your name to features. Many communities rely on the accuracy of OSM data.
chachafish (2019-01-19 12:21:42+00:00): Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. I made some changes here so that you can see how this gate should be mapped. It should actually be tagged as an entrance, with the entrance type as a gate, access=no. The gate would not actually have a name. Thanks :)
Foxy173 (2019-02-12 15:46:22+00:00): Thanks for the change and telling me. What I don´t  like in that approach that it doesn´t show on the map, when not in edit mode. I´m using maps.me for my hikes, and also that will continue to show a passable way. The info that yo will end in front of a gate is not visualized.
chachafish (2019-02-12 18:24:49+00:00): Hello, the untagged node as you mapped it was showing on maps.me? If so, I'm surprised as it was simply a node without a tag telling maps.me how to render the information. At any rate, the gate showed up as an error because OSM didn't know what the node was. It needs some tags telling OSM what the node is. Of course, it is up to the renderer (in this case maps.me) to decide how to display OSM data. OSM has no control over that. There are some limited options available. Is this gate an entrance to something? If so, it can also be tagged as an entrance. Does the gate or the entrance have a name? If it has a name, it can be tagged with a name. Also, if the road is private and there is no access beyond the gate, that road can be tagged as private. I would assume maps.me would render the road as impassable. If a road is impassable, that would be a good indication that you cannot hike beyond that point :) If you need any help, please let me know.
Foxy173 (2019-02-12 21:36:16+00:00): I have never seen how Maps.me would heve shown my untagged gate, but I assume you are right that it would  not have shown neither. Maybe the idea to show the way behind the gate as private road would help. These are in fact visualized differently in maps.me. I found at another gate here in the area, where I understood after being there that the slightly different appearance of the road behind the gate means it is a private road. As far as i know they don't have a legend that explains their road and way types.

As we are discussing here: do you have access to the other change I submitted today? I'm also not sure that I modeled it the right way. The issue  was that a way / road was (correctly) modeled as abandoned rail track. although correct, this doesn´t give the info that the route is now used partially as road, partially a grass or dirt track and is a convenient hiking trail. In some maps the line for that is almost not visible. I modeled by copying the train line on the same route and defining the copied one as trail. If you don't find it by my user you might search near Cachipay the "ferrocarril de Giradot"
chachafish (2019-02-12 22:34:39+00:00): Hey, your trail looks great. Good job. The only thing that could be better is when a trail or a road or a river intersect, they need to be connected with a joining node (link below). I went through and cleaned the trail up so that it doesn't cross the rail anymore, or if it does, it has joining nodes now. If you have any more questions, don't hesitate to ask :) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Node
chachafish (2019-02-12 22:36:29+00:00): Also, in case you didn't know, it takes at least a couple of months for maps.me to update. So, it takes a while before you see any edits you've made.
Yunkers (2019-01-18 20:31:27+00:00): Lepiej byłoby zamiast note dodać access. Tutaj masz porady jak to zrobić https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:access
Blaise Pexyk (2019-01-18 23:12:06+00:00): I na tym polega cały problem, że ten parking  się nie wpisuje w ramy klucza.
Oczywiście można to należałoby wybrać wartość "no" co byłoby uogulnieniem
Yunkers (2019-01-19 11:07:25+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że w tym przypadku wystarczyłoby "access=private" i "access:conditional=yes @ (Sa-Su)".
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-17 13:46:23+00:00): se o pico é sem nome, deixe o nome em branco
Warin61 (2019-01-19 06:14:05+00:00): Hi,
This change has damaged Way: 75828281 "leisure"="common". OSM Inspector reports "duplicate_segment". Looks like a node has been dragged away from where it was. You might like to separate the 'common' from the road to help both road and 'common'.
Yarilla (2019-01-20 07:19:29+00:00): I had a look and have fixed the duplicate segment. Way: 75828281 "leisure"="common" is now separated from the road.
Warin61 (2019-01-20 07:32:57+00:00): That looks about right. 
Cheers.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-01-19 10:36:06+00:00): You are overlapping ways here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6217639299/history

more here: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.13763&lat=-2.53624&zoom=11&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways
BCNorwich (2019-01-18 07:58:54+00:00): Hello, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Just wanted to mention that your new paths are isolated from the overall highway network. As such they cannot be used for routing. I see also that the paths seem to serve the school. Those section of path only serving the school should be tagged accordingly to deter access by the general public when using an OSM derived map.

If you need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-18 04:33:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66414916 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some vandalism in the USA.  For more info see the series of blocks that ends at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2455
Glassman (2019-01-18 19:13:18+00:00): That curb will be confusing. We normally add kerb= to the highway. Since the ways are already separated, the kerb= doesn't add much, but doesn't hurt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66412670
GeekyGoddess (2019-01-18 20:30:02+00:00): If it's not curb, please let me know how to mark it so that it does that there is a divider between the left two turn lane and the other lanes, that extends to the freeway off ramp. It is not possible to get off the freeway and turkey at 116th because of this, but the map thinks it is.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66412670
Glassman (2019-01-18 21:12:55+00:00): I would split east bound NE 8th where the curb separates the lanes. It would connect to the street light at 116th and 8th. Probably needs a turn restriction - no right turn on to west bound 8th - unless it's allow. That will prevent anyone from taking the exit off 8th. or for someone merging onto 8th from 405.
Glassman (2019-01-18 19:11:02+00:00): Tip: Don't for get to change your changeset comment. It doesn't have to be long, just short and to the point. Like "Added no access to section of road."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66412740
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-10 15:14:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102703272 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers in Saudi Arabia.
Yorvik Prestigitator (2019-01-18 13:55:13+00:00): Would it be possible to give better descriptions of what you have edited, rather than just the description "kent" you have used for the past 20 edits?
mueschel (2019-01-21 11:54:29+00:00): Hi, 
could you check the tagging of this way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664306720

Rivière = Écho looks like a mistake.

Jan
MaximusSayan (2019-01-21 22:30:35+00:00): corrected! thank you
Zandu (2019-01-18 05:18:22+00:00): Messaged user on OSM to request they add comments to their changesets in the future.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66414296
mavl (2019-07-21 13:26:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Zandu (2019-01-18 05:11:21+00:00): Stop signs are designed correctly.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66414440
WoodWoseWulf (2019-01-18 04:16:27+00:00): Sorry, I mean changeset #66146642
CloCkWeRX (2019-01-18 06:06:35+00:00): Ah, there might be a few more buildings available under Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta, re the new developments
Glassman (2019-01-18 19:09:33+00:00): Tip: Other imagery is available. Use the layers icon on the right hand side to select from other suppliers. ESRI may be the most current.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66414784
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-18 04:33:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 66412313, 66412411.
Zandu (2019-01-18 05:05:11+00:00): Thank you for adding buildings to the map.  As you continue to map please use the option to make buildings square/rectangular and also add tags to the area that identify it as a building.  These untagged areas will not render on the map as buildings. -Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66415010
mavl (2019-01-18 05:27:16+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 66266642, 66272372, 66289925, 66289989, 66290078, 66290206, 66290274, 66290482, 66290610, 66290724, 66290771, 66324790, 66325029, 66353799, 66353848, 66353883, 66364108, 66364423, 66364657, 66366241, 66366544, 66366583, 66366617, 66393717, 66393784, 66393866, 66393942, 66393997, 66394038, 66394094, 66394136, 66394235, 66395486, 66395558, 66395584, 66395642, 66395704, 66395780, 66395883, 66395905, 66395965, 66396057, 66396079, 66396248, 66396270, 66396298, 66396341, 66396411, 66396488, 66396547, 66396619, 66396723, 66396845, 66396875, 66397602, 66397653, 66397950, 66397984, 66398040, 66398178, 66398255, 66398350, 66398788, 66398878, 66398912, 66398946, 66398964, 66399006, 66399052, 66399160, 66399256, 66400118, 66400186, 66400869.
tonyf1 (2022-09-17 01:38:05+00:00): Hi a lot of these edits look like private notes. This is a public map. Should they be deleted?
tonyf1 (2022-09-19 00:46:23+00:00): Hi, deleted 10 features in Changeset #126349125
Andrew de Lisle (2022-09-19 11:48:13+00:00): Hi,
I don't understand. I can't add new saved points in maps.me app for my own use? I guess i've missed something?
tonyf1 (2022-09-19 19:14:17+00:00): Hi Andrew. Thank you for your contributions to the map. The issue is that this is a public map. I presume camp8 fixed car and firewood are your personal notes and not suitable for sharing on a public map.
Andrew de Lisle (2022-09-20 07:52:24+00:00): Ok, so everytime i add something inside maps.me app it also becomes public?
When you remove it does it also remove it on my personal map?
How do i avoid adding stuff publicly in the future?
Thank you
tonyf1 (2022-09-20 08:04:45+00:00): Hi. Sorry I am not a map.me user. I am just a humble volunteer on openstreetmap. I have heard that the map.me feature which allows edits to openstreetmap is poorly documented and many users are confused. Try a long press to add a waypoint but avoid anything sounding like edit the map. Or try googling your problem. Or inquire on a discussion forum. But please do keep uploading your map edits, the public ones, your contributions are really useful.
Andrew de Lisle (2022-09-20 08:09:48+00:00): Ok, and what about when you remove stuff that i've now added. Will that remove stuff inside my app? I've got a lot of stuff saved you see.
tonyf1 (2022-09-20 08:23:46+00:00): Hi Andrew. I dont intend doing any more deletes of your stuff. Maybe I have missed one or two but the majority of your contributions look really useful to me.
Andrew de Lisle (2022-09-20 08:26:19+00:00): ok, but the deletes you have done are also gone in my maps.me app?
tonyf1 (2022-09-20 09:56:57+00:00): Hi. I guess so. I don't know how often maps.me server updates itself from the open street map server. Similarly I don't know in which circumstances your map app updates itself from the maps.me server.
tonyf1 (2022-09-20 10:17:45+00:00): And nothing is lost forever e.g. camp4 is still recorded in the history as Location: -27.9196474, 134.7547635
nevw (2019-01-18 10:25:12+00:00): You need to map your business to the real physical building location you operate from with suitable tags instead of a PO Box.
nevw (2019-01-18 10:29:34+00:00): I decided to revert this as it is mapped to the footway next to the Woolies carpark and you must only map to the real physical building you operate your business from.
alester (2019-01-19 05:33:45+00:00): This has left the area in a bit of a mess with overlapping and untagged relations and fences where there definitely aren't fences. The Mary Hill military area also now extends much farther than it does on the ground. I've looked at the parcels in the past, and they simply don't match up with what's happening on the ground with regard to Pearson College and the Mary Hill area. The previous state in OSM was the best ballpark I could come up with to reflect the on-the-ground reality. I think the long "finger" of Mary Hill that now extends to the north of the college and across the Goose at least needs to be removed, because that definitely isn't part of the military area, nor are there fences there. The various "parcel" relations in the area also need to be cleaned up and merged with the coastline where applicable.
Fantômas (2019-01-19 20:10:02+00:00): A. Lester is too polite. MelioraCogito, you have a history of ill-conceived imports.
Thomas Petillon (2019-01-29 21:52:38+00:00): Attention à ne pas faire trop confiance aux imageries aériennes !

La situation aux prairies Saint-Martin a beaucoup changé ces derniers mois. Et l'ancien pont pour les relier à la coulée verte n'existe plus. (Il est remplacé par un nouveau.) Cf. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65721024

Quant aux itinéraires (rando et vélo), le marquage n'a pas encore été mis à jour sur le terrain. On ne sait pas par où il vont passer, donc on doit les laisser ouverts pour l'instant.

Mais c'est pas grave, j'avais une mise à jour du coin de prévue, que je viens de faire. :)
lann (2019-02-16 18:49:08+00:00): Merci pour la correction :)
Himké (2019-03-06 22:52:33+00:00): Roundabout approaches should have the same highway=* tag as the connecting roads; not as link road.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#How_to_map
pio2_122 (2019-01-18 07:29:19+00:00): Naprawdę, dalej bawisz się w wandalizmy?
R0bst3r (2019-01-21 08:53:01+00:00): Hallo bl@hdb,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Ich habe zusätzlich noch den FIXME-Hinweis bearbeitet und PLZ und Webseiten ergänzt. FIXME bedeutet, dass hier noch etwas zu tun war. Mehr dazu unter wiki.osm.org.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66417214
eggie (2019-01-18 08:24:49+00:00): Dag Christaan Swart,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

bedrijven worden in OSM op de adresnodes van het kadaster bijgetagd. Dus niet op het gebouw zelf. Ik zal het aanpassen.
Ook de dubbele adresgegevens zal ik verwijderen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-01-18 08:33:23+00:00): info naar adresnode verplaatst. adresnode 3a hersteld.
Die zat was per abuis verplaatst naar een ander pand.
Dit waren uw edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66417216
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
R0bst3r (2019-01-21 09:04:20+00:00): Hallo BaderD,
willkommen bei OSM.
Kannst du hier mehr infos liefern, warum du den Namen entfernt hast?
Wahrscheinlich heißt die Bäckerei inzwischen anders. Armbruster hat dort wohl keine Filliale mehr. Kannst du den neuen namen herausfinden? Oder existiert dort gar keine Bäckerei mehr? Dann könnt eman den Node löschen?
Viele Grüße,
R0bst3r
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66417789
Warin61 (2019-01-19 06:08:58+00:00): Hi,

Hi,
You need to watch the administration boundary relations when you do this. Unfortunately they are tied to the roads so when you ad detail to the roads you can break the administration boundaries. 
I have repaired 2 Admin boundaries here.
danuta_telenav (2019-01-21 06:39:53+00:00): Hello!
Thank you for observation and for feedback!
Have a nice day!
R0bst3r (2019-01-21 09:09:21+00:00): Hallo BaderD,
das Viadukt ist bereits als Fläche erfasst. Ich habe daher deinen Punkt gelöscht. Objekte sollten nur einmal in OSM vorhanden sein. Wie man ein Viadukt erfassen kann, kannst du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bridge%3Dviaduct
Allgemein solltest du nicht nur einen Namen hinzufügen, sondern über die linke Spalte im Onlineeditor auch spezifizieren was es ist.
Adressen sollten an Objekte mit Adressen, Brücken haben im Normalfall keine Adresse.
Viele Grüße,
R0bst3r
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66417882
mbethke (2019-01-19 08:28:26+00:00): Hi,
was there anything wrong with how it was? I found it quite practical to have shared nodes so if you adjusted some roads ike or new imagery you'd automatically adjust the areas they separate, but I don't know if there's some standard on how that's supposed to be done.

cheers,
Matthias
Beager (2019-01-19 09:50:21+00:00): Generally, after I’ve referred to other more detailed cities around the world, I noted that it’s seperated. 
I also noticed in this area that it would be attached to buildings and many other amenities, which would stretch/move these nodes if changes were made to the residential area.
I made this change because of a road (no name) that needed to be changed, but was presenting as quite a challenge to change without causing overlapping residential areas, because of that connection. My intention originally was only to change that one single road, but I found I couldn’t do it without first making this larger change.

Regards,
Brendan.