piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 21:42:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:30:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:37:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:27:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:58:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:19:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:57:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:28:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:20:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:21:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:29:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mueschel (2017-11-18 11:37:56+00:00): Hi,
you used the key "sharrows" here, which is new and undocumented. Did you mean  cycleway=shared_lane ? 

Cheers, Jan
Heather Shearer (2017-11-28 20:54:46+00:00): I did mean to say that, thanks for catching it! (we had a local tagging guide with the wrong scheme - local guide now fixed, along with the tag on this bit of road)
mosstreet (2017-11-10 14:42:26+00:00): СНТ другое обозначение имеет
Alexander-II (2017-11-10 06:40:38+00:00): Привет. Висело правильно. Возвращайте обратно. На частях здания висит этажность частей. На общем контуре - максмимальная этажность здания. Делается это для обратной совместимости с теми, кто не умеет в 3д и части зданий. В вики описано.
augxcgrwxo (2017-11-10 12:51:18+00:00): Можно я изменю, чтобы было одинаково разбито, как 6 и 14 дом? Понял.
Alexander-II (2017-11-16 15:52:19+00:00): Вот 14 и 6 дома отрисованы менее правильно чем был отрисован 8. Я исправлю все три, можете посмотреть, как оно должно быть. Почему именно так - читайте в https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Simple_3D_buildings#.D0.9A.D0.BE.D0.BD.D1.82.D1.83.D1.80_.D0.B7.D0.B4.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D1.8F
Sowa1980 (2017-12-28 01:40:19+00:00): Еще раз огромная просьба не удалять дороги, которые я вношу.
lcat (2017-12-28 06:44:41+00:00): это было 2 месяца назад так-то, рисуй что и как тебе вздумается, больше не буду трогать
Warin61 (2017-11-12 21:50:35+00:00): Hi,
Relations don't like touching outer - you have 2 touching buildings... in this relation 7722753. 
Do they really touch?
If so is there is 'knock through' to provide passage between the two? Then they would be considered one building. 
Or if they don't touch at the walls then separate them - it is only the roofs that give the impression of touching?
Joel Hansen (2017-11-13 04:11:32+00:00): No it's all one building, Just a different roof.

I've fixed it now.
blackboxlogic (2020-05-20 15:45:48+00:00): What is the intended meaning of the key "name:--2017" on node 2785624213?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-17 06:39:17+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102246406/history has building:part = 4 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here and it is unclear what it means
eggie (2017-11-10 08:37:46+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
Warin61 (2017-11-10 08:48:53+00:00): Hi,
Happy to see someone else mapping bus routes! 
The later public transport method is not too hard to use in OSM ... I did Relation: 686 (7258397)  with some help ... see http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7258397#map=15/-33.7219/150.3061 This too does not have all the stops nor the stop references .. not worried about it my self as they don't mean much to me.
Sam Wilson (2017-11-10 09:33:00+00:00): Thanks!

I've only just discovered route relations, and that each direction is a separate relation. Have to go back and re-do some I did a couple of years ago.

I wrote a diary entry about the 158, with pics: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Sam%20Wilson/diary/42690
Sam Wilson (2017-11-10 09:35:08+00:00): Oh, and I just noticed that you're doing highway=bus_stop as well as public_transport=platform... oops. I'll fix mine up.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-10 08:05:24+00:00): Hi sivan00, you've deleted two stops that are present in the Ministry of Transportation GTFS. Can you confirm you're *sure* they are not there?

DESYNC: 40372 Stop exists in GTFS but deleted by user.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5210716220

DESYNC: 40817 Stop exists in GTFS but deleted by user.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5210716045
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-10 08:08:30+00:00): The deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5210716045 is likely a mistake, and the duplicate https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3816569070 should have been deleted instead. Would you mind if I fix this?
.
I still need your feedback regarding node 5210716220
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-10 08:10:57+00:00): For your convenience, node 5210716220 was located here, west side of the roundabout, https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/32.56864/34.95457
sivan00 (2017-11-10 08:50:32+00:00): Those bus stops do not exist.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-10 08:53:36+00:00): Thanks. You removed 5210716045 but did not remove a stop a few meters away, 3816569070. Does only one of them exist, or neither?
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-10 08:57:35+00:00): In other words, should I remove the two stops that are in this changeset?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53659888
eggie (2017-11-10 08:43:39+00:00): Removed no-tag node. What is your intention. Please reply.
eggie (2017-11-10 08:42:15+00:00): The Posthoorn was already tagged. Removed your empty node.
info merged with the address-node.
geri-oc (2017-11-10 19:00:05+00:00): Bist du dir sicher mit
isced:level=8? Ist auch ein noch nicht abgestimmtes Tag - besonders für Deutschland falsch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ISCED
Eugen der Ossel (2017-11-13 18:30:32+00:00): Vielen Dank für Ihren Hinweis. Richtig wäre isced:level=0, oder?
andi9876 (2017-12-10 08:41:28+00:00): Dear, no attraction there! Please stop add!
manings (2017-11-17 13:37:00+00:00): hi Randell,

we noticed your edits was part of an organized edits, we documented it here: https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/33
sivan00 (2017-11-10 09:00:25+00:00): No. One exists and the other was a duplicate.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-10 09:02:00+00:00): Next time please delete the one that does not have "ref" and no "source=israel_gtfs". You can also freely move the remaining one.
.
Thank you for the feedback.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-10 09:06:36+00:00): Or more simply: The bot marks suspect duplicates with fixmes. Those are the ones to be removed.
GOwin (2017-11-12 05:29:29+00:00): In OSM, `commercial` activities are related to office work. Hence, `building=commercial` would indicate a building mostly used for unspecified office work. If the building primarily consist of shops, it should be tagged as `building=retail`

Check out https://wiki.osm.org for details.
Seandebasti (2017-11-12 17:46:29+00:00): hey, warum findest du das das meadow ist und nicht aquaculture? way 191786271
literan (2017-11-10 10:09:46+00:00): приветствую! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5221133773 - это не memorial (не памятник и не мемориальная табличка). memorial - это в память о чем-либо или о ком-либо.
F-5 System (2017-11-11 06:47:50+00:00): А какой тег тогда использовать? Вариант "plate" (табличка) в Wiki предлагают менять на другие, а  "информационная табличка" тоже не подходит по смыслу. Других вариантов "табличек с надписью", я что-то не нашёл.
(хотя с учётом прошедшего времени, это уже почти "мемориальная" табличка ) ).
literan (2017-11-11 10:43:23+00:00): это объекты, которые никто не мапит, поэтому лучше вам выдумать свой тег для них. Наверное, какой-нибудь man_made=sign_plate. А время жизни объекта не является критерием мемориальности (в противном случае нам нужно было бы вешать тег memorial на любое дерево, дом, фонарный столб или забор, проживший больше, скажем, 30-50 лет, или сколько там этим табличкам).
literan (2017-11-10 10:42:08+00:00): вы поставили точку рядом с тротуаром. Очевидно, что там школы быть не может - потому откачу. Попробуйте еще раз, более тщательно
mavl (2018-12-25 19:52:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:26:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:11:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
anu_bala (2019-04-17 00:59:39+00:00): "Hi Akarimullah,

Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
"way 539595369
way 539595365
way 539595366
way 539595364
way 539595357
way 539595358"
classified as ""un-classified"". However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
As of now making necessary changes, Please revert if it is otherwise.

Thanks in Advance"
mavl (2018-12-25 21:00:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
DD1GJ (2017-11-11 14:11:46+00:00): Hallo Alexander, willkommen bei OSM. Ich habe deine Zugangsbeschränkungen wieder zurückgesetzt, da alles bereits korrekt eingetragen war. Feld- und Waldwege sind in den Router-Defaulteinstellungen in Deutschland für alle Motorfahrzeuge (ausgenommen Land- und Forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr) gesperrt, aber für Fußgänger, Radfahrer und Pferde frei. die Wege waren zudem bereits durch ein Zustztag, das ich noch etwas optimiert habe (motor_vehicle=agricultural) für den motorisierten Verkehr gesperrt. 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
mavl (2018-12-25 19:45:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:04:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:20:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:06:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
yaugenka (2018-03-29 20:14:35+00:00): Please don't delete multipolygons from settlements like this
http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=7512159
sebastic (2018-03-30 05:23:38+00:00): Then tag the multipolygons appropriately so they are not considered old-style multipolygons (with only the type=multipolygon tag on the relation).
yaugenka (2018-03-30 10:10:20+00:00): old-style tagging is not a reason for deleting objects. majority of settlements in our country are tagged in that manner right now and we are improving it gradually.
sebastic (2018-03-30 10:25:46+00:00): It is when the tags are better left on the ways, the relation has no added value.

If you don't want multipolygon relations to be touched, you need to ensure they have proper tags along with the type=multipolygon.

In this case using a different type than multipolygon is probably more appropriate even.
yaugenka (2018-03-30 11:04:28+00:00): Here are the values which the relation adds:
1. some settlements consists of several separate areas (multipolygons), so putting tags in the ways would cause duplicate settlements.
2. putting tags into ways would render settlement name twice on the osm.org: from the way and label.
3. you can collect boundary ways, label and admin_center nodes into one object only by means of a relation
sebastic (2018-03-30 11:39:41+00:00): As long as the tags are on the ways and not on the relation it's not a proper multipolygon.

Using a relation to group ways is okay, but using type=multipolygon for the relation is not.

Adding fixme=<some reason> to the relation will keep it out of the data set I use to fix old-style multipolygons. You should take note of that if you don't want improper multipolygon relations touched.
yaugenka (2018-03-30 11:47:23+00:00): Can you give link to a wiki page where it says that type=multipolygon for relations is incorrect?
sebastic (2018-03-30 11:49:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon
yaugenka (2018-03-30 12:00:41+00:00): can you give a quote from that page which states that relations with deprecated tags should be deleted?
sebastic (2018-03-30 12:56:45+00:00): The wiki documents multipolygon relations. Since it's a wiki it can be made to say anything you want. :-)

I'll point you to this instead: http://area.jochentopf.com/old-style-josm.html

You can keep arguing here against the deletion of relations with only type=multipolygon tags, but that won't convince any one. Tag the relations appropriately, as documented in the Multipolygon wiki for example, and the relations won't even show up in the old-style multipolygon dataset. Or if you cannot tag it like a proper multipolygon, at least document your intentions with the relation in a fixme or note tag.

I've been fixing old-style multipolygons in a variety of ways on a daily basis for over a year now, if you keep creating invalid multipolygon relations like these I will step on your toes again. If you don't want that, learn for this discussion and tag the relations appropriately.
yaugenka (2018-03-30 13:07:55+00:00): I'm grateful for your help in fixing such relations but the deletions is subject to escalation
mavl (2018-12-25 21:00:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:37:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:25:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:37:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:09:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:47:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:03:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:30:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:42:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:50:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:43:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:02:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:00:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:21:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:22:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
FTA (2019-02-02 02:20:44+00:00): Hi, this turn is valid, so I have gone ahead and deleted the turn restriction. Cheers, Ethan
Aleks-Berlin (2017-11-11 12:09:43+00:00): Hi Larissa_Laeubli, please follow the OSM wiki.
wikipedia="de:Article" not "http..".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
Thanks, Alex
mavl (2018-12-25 21:34:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:22:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].