piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-12-08 16:19:50+00:00): It was okay, but I disconnected the residential from the landuse.
zstadler (2016-04-06 17:53:06+00:00): Dear Peda,

In this changeset you have removed the note on the "Jerusalem" name dispute

It looks like you did not notice that the resolution of the dispute was already violated and the node does has the banned "name" tag.

Please also consider restoring the note.
Peda (2016-04-06 21:13:57+00:00): Hi zstadler,

as I pointed out in a private mail too, this dispute can be seen as settled as there had not been edit wars for a long time and as the actual dispute is not visible anymore due to the license change back then (version 22-39 are missing). Due to the huge amount of name:xx tags, the note tag is not even visible to most. Btw, the actual "violation" of the resolution was done by the Redaction Bot, so there's not really anyone to blame for that. And as the Hebrew name was the value of choice for a long time *before* the dispute, I thought we could keep that name.

And imho we should keep it as is, taking the dispute as settled. If you think otherwise I'd suggest we start a post on the forum to discuss what the local community considers the best way to go.

Peda
iorant (2016-02-04 09:18:59+00:00): Привіт. Можна поцікавитися джерелом висот і положення усіх цих гір? Сподіваюся, не карти генштаба?
ungvar (2016-02-04 09:50:04+00:00): Привіт. Назви перевірені, співпадають з "народними". Висоти генштабівські, положення намагаюсь прив'язати до горизонталей з веломапи.
iorant (2016-02-04 20:18:38+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=575206#p575206
ungvar (2016-02-04 22:29:46+00:00): Відверто кажучи, так можна дійти до абсурду. Адже навряд хтось з юзерів проводив нівелювання Говерли для визначення того, що її висота 2061 метр. Тобто висота Говерли - об'єкт права власності Державної служби України з питань геодезії, картографії і кадастру. Адже вони є правонаступниками державної установи, працівники якої провели тріангуляцію на вершині Говерли у 70 років тому. Але, тим не менше, Говерла на карті є. Звичайно, Вам видніше що правильно, а що - ні. Просто принцип доволі цікавий.
Müszi (2016-02-04 17:17:21+00:00): Looks like you don't care about the rest of the world - I made several comments about your changes, but you seem to ignore them.

Please don't tag forest tracks with a name and/or ref, and don't tag them "tracktype=grade1" because this is incorrect.

PLEASE STOP DESTROYING THE MAP!
user_5359 (2016-02-04 05:50:14+00:00): Sorry I have revert your changes. Was really the name of the road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13345604/history) changed or did you just mark your address? Please try it again.

Regards Georg V. (OSM=user_5359)
user_5359 (2016-02-08 12:05:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you really live on the street? And please add the key=shop for your business: As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
ma-rt-in (2016-03-03 19:17:27+00:00): War es deine Absicht, die Relation zu leeren?
Beinahe hätte ich sie glöscht.
Müszi (2016-02-04 17:09:30+00:00): Hi!

How is possible for a road to be "surface=dirt" and "tracktype=grade1" the same time? :-)

Hint: the wiki says "tracktype=grade1" is "a paved or heavily compacted hardcore surface".

Please don't tag roads as "tracktype=grade1" unless they really are of that type - especially if they are based on surveys (mine, actually).
RicoElectrico (2016-02-05 02:22:14+00:00): Teraz to ulicy Kopernika nie ma wcale...
maraf24 (2016-02-05 08:12:04+00:00): Dzięki, filtr objął, a nie zauważyłem.
Eberth (2016-02-04 14:36:24+00:00): Das gesamte Gelände ist kein Gebäude, daher ist building=yes nicht angebracht.
Ich habe office=company und name=Spedition Rossbach mal an einen Knoten auf dem Gelände geschrieben und das building-tag gelöscht.
Ist das Büro (office) unten rechts in dem Gebäude? Dann könnte man die Tags daran knüpfen.
Supaplex (2016-02-07 12:32:12+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
Martin Borsje (2016-02-04 21:56:43+00:00): Beste Coen,
Welkom op OSM!

Deze edit, je eerste, is echter geheel niet goed! Wat gedaan hebt is en geheel nieuw voetpad aangelegd voor het grot edeel over bestaande wegen en dit Ommetje beekhuizen genoemd. Dit klopt niet want de wegen liggen er al!
ls je een op de grond zichtbare wandelroute wilt invoeren moetje dat middels een routerelatie doen.
Wij je deze edit geheel herstellen aub. Als je hulp nodig hebt, laat het dan weten.
RicoElectrico (2016-02-04 11:05:15+00:00): Te budynki są zdaje się z miejskiej geodezji. Mógłbyś na razie nie ruszać ich geometrii? Jeśli są podzielone, to jest ku temu powód, np. różna liczba kondygnacji. Zostawienie ich oddzielnie ułatwia pracę gdy chce się zrobić z nich trójwymiarowy model (patrz OSM 3D). Gwarantuję Ci, że jest wiele bardziej potrzebnych rzeczy do zmapowania ;)
Xayan (2016-02-04 11:19:46+00:00): No powiem Ci że ja tam mieszkam i to wszystko to jest jeden budynek. Zwłaszcza ten podłużny od wschodniej strony jest częścią tego dużego. Ale ok, w takim razie powiedz mi jak te zmiany cofnąć :)
RicoElectrico (2016-02-05 09:18:08+00:00): Ja tam mam po prostu jako takie zaufanie do roboty gdyńskich geodetów, szczególnie patrząc na inne powiaty ;) Ale pewnie masz rację w takim układzie.
RicoElectrico (2016-02-05 10:15:56+00:00): BTW, zobacz sobie na czat w MapCraft.
freeExec (2016-02-04 15:02:56+00:00): Эк тебя занесло в такие дали :)
Orofarne (2016-02-04 15:05:49+00:00): Да я случайно =)  про формат миссинг мапс рассказывал.
patwell (2016-02-04 13:09:04+00:00): Nice edits!
d1g (2016-09-12 19:55:31+00:00): Не знаю, говорили ли вам уже, но тег addr:city=* не обязательный, программы будут работать т.к. все дома в черте города.

В iD он показывается на всякий случай когда город точной границей со всеми тегами не указан.

У ваших же объектов всё работает и с 2 тегами: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372046859/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372046868/history
user_5359 (2016-02-08 12:45:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM!. If this is a official school , please add the key amenity=school to the address
Hjart (2016-02-04 10:55:06+00:00): Bemærk at polygonen der omgiver hele golfbanen har det meste af dette info angivet allerede og at det er bedst kun at have det et sted (på polygonen)
naoliv (2016-02-20 06:16:33+00:00): Luis Gustavo, não criei proibições de retorno quando a via de origem e destino são iguais (isto é, criar uma proibição de retornar na própria rua).
Isso é desnecessário e errado.
user_5359 (2016-02-08 12:50:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your business to building.
Tomas Straupis (2016-02-04 14:14:02+00:00): Šis ežeras jau buvo pažymėtas. Panaikinau naujai pridėtą dublį ir papildžiau anksčiau įvesto ežero pavadinimus.
RicoElectrico (2016-02-05 03:18:25+00:00): To jest import z BDOT? Widzę rozbieżności z rzeczywistością, np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148104936
Lepiej by było trasować z WMS powiatu wejherowskiego. Wnoszę o revert tego.
przemas75 (2016-02-05 09:34:52+00:00): Zgadza się, lepiej z wejherowskiego. Jest trochę nieścisłości, ale w mojej opinii dużo lepiej jest robić to z bdot niż miec to co jest w tej chwili (rosomakowe).
Ten rejon jest konkretnie poprzesuwany względem realiów i to jest problem. A nie, że trochę budynków będzie odbiegało od rzeczywistości.
To co chciałeś rewertować po prostu poprawiłem.
Mi się nie udało zaprząc wmsa wejherowskiego do tracer'a. Masz może sposób?
RicoElectrico (2016-02-05 10:14:32+00:00): U mnie działał super. Np. zmapowałem Bolszewo tak z rok temu. Teraz sprawdzałem i wciąż jest OK. Tu masz ustawienia: http://i.imgur.com/kpLJTCB.png - Sprawdź może czy to nie wina odwzorowania, ja mam domyślnego Merkatora.
SKald (2019-01-10 09:45:39+00:00): Sorry, aber das war keine Korrektur! Der Gipfel ist schon dort, wo er vorher war...
SKald (2019-01-10 09:50:08+00:00): Hab mich verschaut! Tut mir leid, hat eh alles gepasst!
Hervé Saint-Amand (2016-02-04 23:16:54+00:00): Hi John, it seems you just deleted the name, though. Did you mean to set this segment to be "Potterow"?
John Findlay (2016-02-05 01:09:13+00:00): Apologies. Yes. I was trying to amend the section of road between Marshall Street and Crichton Street (which was shown as Chapel Street) to Potterrow but couldn't do so. I hadn't realised my deletion had been saved. Any chance we can correct it? Chapel Street then runs south from Crichton Street to West Crosscauseway, I believe. Thanks
dgitto (2016-02-04 13:32:10+00:00): How this happened? And I was working on the same area in the meantime
unsungNovelty (2016-02-08 06:54:35+00:00): Sorry for the inconvenience. Did my changeset destroy any data that you traced?
Lemme know incase you need any help.
cadsauxk (2016-07-02 11:52:06+00:00): Prezado Daniel, obrigado por suas contribuições. 

Vou proceder a adaptação da via BR-402 entre Barreirinha e Paulino Neves para as regras vigentes do OSM/Brazil (procure na wiki por schema_br2013).

Em particular, highway=track é realmente só para trilhas agrícolas, nenhuma estrada deve ser marcada como track por pior que ela seja. Vou revisar para highway=unclassified com as tags adicionais surface=sand (representando sua descrição de areia), 4wd_only=yes (somente 4x4) junto com smoothness=very_bad. A sua descrição "Estrada de areia só 4x4" estou movendo para o campo "description". 

Qualquer dúvida entre em contato, obrigado.
GinaroZ (2016-02-04 12:37:29+00:00): Hi, noticed you added these zebra crossings. Having travelled along this road I can tell you they should be pelican crossings, so I have changed them :)
jaakkoh (2016-02-04 15:51:04+00:00): And if anyone is wondering about EEZ it stands for Exclusive Economic Zone and some more info on it can be found e.g. in OSM wiki at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dmaritime#Exclusive_economic_zone_.28EEZ.29_.28200.C2.A0nm_zone.29
Chetan_Gowda (2016-04-27 07:27:11+00:00): Hey @tchokona, Please mention what is the imagery used to trace all the buildings in the changeset. It'd be helpful for other OSM  contributors to know easily. 

Thank you. 

Chetan
dudka (2016-02-04 13:23:41+00:00): http://lubomlmisto.in.ua/page-rishennya-radi-54-83
grin (2017-08-18 10:59:41+00:00): Miért csináltad a "fixme=position/dupe" tageket? Ez nálad mit jelent? Olyan poikon van rajta ahol nincs dupe, a pozíciót pedig felmérés alapján tettem be. Pl. balmádiban a pinkóczi-csárda...
vasony (2017-08-18 12:36:46+00:00): de dupla, ha a tied a jó, akkor a másikat kell leszedni: =ua a név/web/telefonszám

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3439631889

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2392854614
grin (2017-08-18 18:24:45+00:00): Nem tudom leszedni mert nem én tettem fel, és nem is mértem fel. (Megpróbálok holnap arra járni, de nincs fotóm az útnak arról a részéről.) De ha az egyik source=survey a másik meg megbízhatatlan akkor érdemes a megbízhatatlant taggelni, nem a felmértet. :-)
Alecs01 (2016-02-04 19:52:32+00:00): Ciao Alberto, benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! per indicare che si tratta di un luogo che si chiama così, il solo tag name=* non basta (ci dice come si chiama, ma non di cosa si tratta). Dovresti aggiungere il tag place=locality, che nella "lingua" del tagging di OpenStreetMap descrive un luogo (con nome) non abitato, vedi qui: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:place Ciao buon mapping!
jc86035 (2016-02-05 06:59:38+00:00): As far as I'm aware this road is not gazetted as a highway and takes highway=primary.
00crashtest (2016-02-05 08:26:17+00:00): Tsing Yi North Coastal Road is located in the Tsing Ma Control Area. Since the Tsing Ma Control Area should be classified as a motorway, all roads part of it should also be a motorway.
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-07 19:12:37+00:00): This changeset was fully or in part reverted by changeset 37065420
trigpoint (2016-02-07 14:00:02+00:00): Hi
Do you have any evidence that these tramlines are still visible on the ground, http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3300987 suggests they aren't.
Please do not copy things that no longer exist from old maps as all that does is spoil the map for other users and in areas such a London add clutter which makes mapping harder for others.
Mapping is far more rewarding if you actually go out and map things you are familiar with than armchair mapping of thing which no longer exist.
SK53 (2016-02-07 14:05:04+00:00): These dont exist anymore, are not visible and certainly havent been for at least 20 years (probably nearer 75+). They should not be mapped on OSM. By all means add the historical London Tram Network to OHM, but not to OSM.
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-07 19:12:38+00:00): This changeset was fully or in part reverted by changeset 37065420
jaakkoh (2016-02-04 15:52:43+00:00): Information regarding EEZ is in OSM wiki as noted at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36996901
jc86035 (2016-02-05 07:01:14+00:00): Cheung Pei Shan Road is not a highway for any of its length and is therefore (from exit 25A to exit 24C) tagged as highway=trunk.
00crashtest (2016-02-05 08:28:06+00:00): Cheung Pei Shan Road is a motorway as it has the blue distance markers on the roadside. Also, the westbound onramp from Tsuen Kam Interchange has a motorway sign.
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-07 19:12:39+00:00): This changeset was fully or in part reverted by changeset 37065420
DD1GJ (2016-02-05 10:21:41+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang, bei Feldwegen sollte die Beschaffenheit mit angegeben werden:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
http://einklich.net/temp/osm-tutorial.pdf
jc86035 (2016-02-05 06:47:40+00:00): Incorrect; this road should be highway=trunk as it is a trunk road but not an expressway.
00crashtest (2016-02-05 08:29:27+00:00): jc86035, doesn't having blue distance marker signs make a road a motorway?
00crashtest (2016-02-05 08:30:28+00:00): It is because the trunk roads Lung Cheung Road and Kwai Chung Road don't have blue distance marker signs.
jc86035 (2016-02-05 09:09:04+00:00): The distance markers don't make the roads motorways. The government just adds them inconsistently to trunk routes, I think. In the last several years it has been according to whether a road is on this list http://www.gld.gov.hk/egazette/pdf/20101448/egn201014487570.pdf.
jc86035 (2016-02-05 06:50:51+00:00): Should be highway=trunk. A few months ago bbkwan incorrectly changed West Kowloon Corridor to highway=motorway and that has yet to be fixed
letihu (2016-05-17 20:07:33+00:00): Das
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3734848836/history
 hier richtig ist glaube ich nicht.
schmarn (2016-05-17 20:18:08+00:00): Da stimme ich dir zu. Wusste damals nicht was ich damit machen sollte, ist dann in Vergessenheit geraten.
Apo42 (2016-09-21 00:19:17+00:00): way 396026060 is not a building. It's a camper van. please stop tracing buildings automatically if the algorithm is not able to do it correct.
samely (2016-09-26 16:05:26+00:00): Hi Apo24.
I added it because it looks like a little part of the house. However, if you know better this place, please, feel free to retagging it or even deleting it. Thanks for contributing to improving the map.
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-07 19:12:40+00:00): This changeset was fully or in part reverted by changeset 37065420
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-07 19:12:41+00:00): This changeset was fully or in part reverted by changeset 37065420
dvdhoven (2016-02-05 06:29:37+00:00): Er lagen diverse wegen los van elkaar. Dat is niet de eerste keer deze week. Elke keer is het fietsknooppuntennetwerk weer onderbroken. Verder moeten landuse vlakken niet aan wegen worden geknoopt
marczoutendijk (2016-04-06 12:25:08+00:00): Is deze kerk ook nog als kerk in gebruik?
knarf (2016-04-06 12:30:18+00:00): Ja is nog steeds in gebruik als kerk, maar meestal voor concerten, lezingen, exposities enz
marczoutendijk (2016-04-06 13:35:32+00:00): Heeft het dan zin om (voor de volledigheid) amenity=place_of_worship toe te voegen?
knarf (2016-04-06 13:39:20+00:00): Zou kunnen, heb er aan gedacht maar hij wordt echt heel weinig als kerk gebruikt, een paar keer per jaar, hoofd functie is toch wel bijeenkomst/ cultureel. Ik wil het wel doen, of toch beter van niet??

gr

Frank
marczoutendijk (2016-04-06 14:18:27+00:00): In dat geval zou ik het niet doen. De kerkfunctie is dan zo ondergeschikt geworden aan de overige functies, dat het inderdaad geen zin heeft. En uit de naam valt uiteindelijk ook nog wat af te leiden.
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-07 19:12:42+00:00): This changeset was fully or in part reverted by changeset 37065420
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-07 19:12:43+00:00): This changeset was fully or in part reverted by changeset 37065420
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-07 19:12:44+00:00): This changeset was fully or in part reverted by changeset 37065420
Hjart (2016-02-06 17:35:42+00:00): When editing in Denmark, please keep highway=* and landuse separate
woodpeck_repair (2016-02-07 19:12:45+00:00): This changeset was fully or in part reverted by changeset 37065420
eggie (2021-08-18 10:10:34+00:00): Send PM ...  welcome to OSM
SomeoneElse (2016-03-23 18:44:32+00:00): "mobile-phone" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3982283906/history was clearly not a misspelling; did you explain to the previous mapper why you made the change?  If you don't, next time they'll use "mobile-phone" again.
HolgerJeromin (2016-12-15 20:55:14+00:00): Naja, platform bei Verl-West ist eine leichte Übertreibung für die Grasfläche oder?
Nakaner (2016-02-04 23:59:13+00:00): Könntest du bitte gescheitere Änderungssatz-Kommentare als "w" angeben?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
phibsi (2016-02-06 14:12:01+00:00): Hi ja nur irgendwie hat da mein PC gesponnen sorry
user_242798 (2016-06-23 11:47:10+00:00): * Jan Blankenbrug, Middelwaard is NOT [highway=service]: [agricultural=yes] + [bicycle=yes].
* [highway=service]: Generally for access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice

* [service=drive_through] is complete and utter nonsense!
Use [service=drive-through] with [highway=service] to indicate that a highway is for drive-through service at a business, where customers can purchase products without leaving their cars.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddrive-through

* Highway continuity is broken. Reverted to history: [highway=unclassified].

* Is [bicycle=yes] correct? [traffic_sign=NL:C1; "Uitgezonderd brommobielen"]

* [barrier=lift_gate] is incorrect: [barrier=swing_gate]. Not surveyed, not corrected.

* [amenity=parking] + [parking=bicycle_parking] is NOT correct. Correct: [amenity=bicycle_parking].
[parking:type=stand] is NOT correct. Correct: [bicycle_parking=stands]
Nakaner (2016-02-04 17:25:32+00:00): This changesets reverts following changesets: 36829403, 36829375, 36829046, 36828840, 36828742, 36828476, 36828308, 36827763, 36827656, 36827154, 36826403, 36826374, 36826031, 36825912, 36825265, 36825121, 36824887, 36823807, 36822987, 36822788, 36822501, 36822126, 36821821, 36821810, 36821571, 36820736, 36820490, 36820449, 36820330, 36820100, 36820009, 36819859, 36819627, 36819209, 36737247, 36736914, 36736730, 36735936, 36735027, 36734926, 36734167, 36725833, 36725776, 36720424, 36720291, 36720271, 36720180, 36719891, 36719516, 36719222
sheldonelectric (2024-02-20 13:02:56+00:00): Bonjour, pourrais tu verifier l'emplacement exact de cette borne (si elle existe encore)? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3988130194/ J'ai vu une autre borne payante chez volkswagen mais je ne vois pas celle de Renault.
literan (2016-02-05 12:54:38+00:00): hospital это больница!!! тег для клиники - amenity=clinic
literan (2016-02-05 12:56:00+00:00): Андрей, бесполезно добавлять одно имя (name) без значащих тегов. Считайте, что зря выполнили работу. Главное это значащий тег (в данном случае, скорее всего это shop=beauty - похоже на салон красоты). Я здесь все за вами поправлю, но в будущем сразу проставляйте теги, иначе ваши правки просто будут откатывать как бесполезные
naoliv (2016-02-04 17:49:01+00:00): hgodinho, não grude as áreas nas ruas. Isso é errado.
Desenhe os prédios e áreas apenas onde eles se encontram, sem unir com as ruas.
hgodinho (2016-02-04 18:39:23+00:00): naoliv obrigado pela dica!
apm-wa (2016-07-24 06:48:17+00:00): Квартирный "дом" не House а Apartments.
apm-wa (2018-03-24 05:38:14+00:00): Lotus, Atlant and Gorogly Fitness are fitness centres/gyms, not sports centres.

Tag should be leisure=fitness_centre
utack (2017-12-08 16:48:56+00:00): Servus,  
vielleicht sind das die neuen Gebäude für node 3988494804, die jetzt im "Digital Globe Standard" Luftbild sichtbar sind?  
https://i.imgur.com/MhYBAUR.png  
VG
dvdhoven (2016-02-05 06:31:51+00:00): Bij deze fix is wel knooppunt 98 verloren gegaan. En dus een aantal fkp routes de problemen in Hier ligt fkp van  Twente en Vechtdal.
eggie (2016-02-05 17:23:28+00:00): Dirk.. Dit kruispunt zegt me even niks. Kan me ook niet herinneren dat ik een knooppunt heb weggehaald.  He jij het nog kunnen herstellen?
Wat ik wel heb gedaan is duplicate ways weggehaald. Daar zat geen fietsroute op.
Op dit kruispunt zie ik nergens m'n naam staan maar hier in de buurt heb ik wel gemapt. 
Eggie
dvdhoven (2016-02-05 17:43:31+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Voor zover ik kon zien aan de historie, heb je de tags van het infopaneel van de knoop af gehaald. En daarbij is de tag rcn_ref verloren gegaan.
Ik heb een tijdje infopanelen op de knopen gezet. Ank-Eric heeft me erop gewezen dat dat niet moet. Maar hier en daar staan infopanelen nog steeds op de knopen.
Herstellen is geen probleem Ik ben fkp expert :-)
Met de wegen in dat gebied is inderdaad wat aan de hand. Ook liggen daar vaak landuse vlakken op de weg geplakt. Ik weet wel dat ik met inleggen fkp ook al problemen had, wegen te selecteren.
Je naam stond ook in de tool van vmarc als wijziger.
Die tool is een uitkomst en geleidelijk krijgen een aantal mappers de netwerken "schoon" dwz geen fouten meer in vmarc.
En bij de inmiddels schone netwerken zie je nu gelijk of er iets mis is.
eggie (2016-02-05 17:52:14+00:00): Oké..bedankt  Dirk!

Het is daar één groot aan elkaar plakwerk. Dat maakt het moeilijk om het te herstellen.
maar bedankt...
EneaSuper (2016-02-10 12:46:18+00:00): Ottimo lavoro per i giardini a Pontedecimo, avevano bisogno di una sistemata fatta come si deve! :)
Ale_Zena_IT (2016-02-10 13:12:57+00:00): Fa parte del progetto del Municipio Val Polcevera sulla rivalutazione del Verde Comune
Meillo (2016-02-05 10:14:26+00:00): Hallo youcann und willkommen zur OSM!

Schoen, dass du etwas beigetragen hast.

Ich habe eine kleine Anmerkung dazu. Das name-Tag sollte nur fuer Eigennamen verwendet werden, nicht aber fuer Beschreibungen oder die normalsprachliche Wiederholung der semantischen Tags. (Dass es sich bei diesem Objekt um einen Aussichtspunkt handelt, ist schon durch tourism=viewpoint hinterlegt.) Siehe:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

Nun wuensche ich dir aber viel Freude beim weiteren Mappen. Wenn du Fragen hast, darfst du dich gerne an mich wenden.
youcann (2016-02-05 11:41:29+00:00): Viene Dank für deine Anmerkung. Habe den überflüssigen Tag wieder gelöscht.

lg Marvin
Endres Pelka (2016-02-18 20:58:12+00:00): Przecież jest stars=3, po co gwiazdki w nazwie?
Endres Pelka (2016-03-23 14:02:16+00:00): Proszę o odpowiedź.
emergency99 (2016-02-04 22:28:58+00:00): Bushaltestellen haben in der Regel keine Telefonnummer und Adresse, und auch die Internetseite von Gechwindl passt hier nicht. Ich weiß jetzt nicht, ob du das nur von einem Bestehenden punkt übernommen hast, aber wenn das bei einer platform node steht, sollte es eher entfernt werden. Ich werde mir die Haltestellen in nächster zeit mal alle anschauen, und Tags, die eher nicht passen entfernen. Auch werden alle Haltestellen von 1A-99B von den Wiener Linien verwaltet... Wenn also noch bei anderen Stationen ein Sub unternehmer genannt ist, bitte das auch gleich rauslöschen. Danke ...