piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2016-03-15 11:25:24+00:00): Bemærk også at det i mange tilfælde ikke realistisk lader sig gøre præcist at afspejle "Den virkelige verden" og at der er en del praktiske hensyn at tage der til en vis grad kræver at vi "stiliserer" objekter. Der er f.eks. mange begyndere der lader enden af en ny sti hænge ved kanten af en bredere vej i stedet for at forbinde de to, sådan som det kræves af hensyn til navigation. (Jeg husker endda at jeg selv gjorde det til at begynde med).
Hjart (2016-03-15 12:08:10+00:00): Jeg vil bare generelt sige at man ikke bør gå så meget op i "nøjagtighed" at man gør tingene alt for besværlige for den næste der skal redigere et område eller objekt og som måske ikke har så meget tid eller erfaring som en selv.
GerdP (2016-03-14 08:03:25+00:00): Hi there!
You changed a highway=path to highway=lane here. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231279586
This tag value is not documented, so the way will probaby be ignored by routers. Was this a typo ?
Cycleways may be mapped as separate ways or as attributes of the major roads, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycleway
AgusQui (2016-03-20 23:07:41+00:00): Separaste la calzada de Martinez Zuviria (donde estan las paradas del 129), ¿esto es asi realmente? la ultima vez que pasé no había cantero ni nada parecido.
Sergio Marcelo F (2016-03-21 00:39:00+00:00): Hola AgusQui las separe por que tiene distintas desembocaduras sobre san martin y ademas porque es una av de 6 carriles tres de un lado y tres del otro mas que nada por eso no tiene cantero intermedio, Me pareció lo correcto pero si lo vez mal se puede dejar como antes pero es mas confuso. saludos
AgusQui (2016-03-21 00:47:09+00:00): Las vías se separan únicamente si hay un divisor físico que impida a un vehículo cruzarse al carril contrario.
Ando haciendo algunas ediciones por la zona, ahora lo corrijo, de paso agregué las relaciones de la 129 a las paradas que mapeaste.
Sergio Marcelo F (2016-03-21 00:57:21+00:00): Ok bueno, si es asi que asi sea.. fijate que desde las paradas salen el 129 por centenario y el auto pista también unos directos a Rotonda de Alpargatas que no siguen a la plata sino que terminan en la rotonda y se vuelven, no se si mapean también los recorridos hasta ahí no llegue todavía
AgusQui (2016-03-21 01:50:17+00:00): no conozco los ramales de esa linea, agruegue las relaciones segun lo que pusiste en las paradas, aca podes ver los ramales mapeados: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3789482 si ves error avisame o deja una nota, los que van hasta Alpargatas supongo que son fraccionados, y en ese caso no se mapean.
Sergio Marcelo F (2016-03-21 02:21:03+00:00): Bueno desde el vamos el R5 del 129 no existe mas solo los ramales La plata por Centenario y La plata por Autopista, el ramal Alpargatas directo solo funciona de lunes a viernes de 15:30 a 19.00 hs el Ramal 14 sale de la parada que esta del lado de Av, San Martin, es decir desde ahi inicia su recorrido. saludos
Sergio Marcelo F (2016-03-21 02:27:14+00:00): Te hago una consulta, veo que a las paradas solo le pusiste "Retiro" y ninguna acotación, no tendría que decir el destino a donde va y el numero de linea? o por lo menos el numero de linea?
AgusQui (2016-03-21 02:51:01+00:00): Los datos de lineas y destinos de cada parada salen de las relaciones de transporte publico asociadas, en osm.org esa info se ve al hacer clic con (?), o con la opcion "datos del mapa". En la app OsmAnd se puede saber los bondis que pasan al clickear cada parada. O sea el dato está, cada software lo puede mostrar de diferente forma.
Sergio Marcelo F (2016-03-21 03:11:42+00:00): ahh buenisimo. ahora en castellano... je je je ah otra cosa el R2 tampoco existe mas los unicos que existen son R10 Once/Maritimo (Berazategui) - R14 Retiro/Florencio Varela - y 19 Once/Ingeniero Allan (Florencio varela) los que van y vienen de la plata o de la rotonda de alpargatas no tienen numero de ramal
SK53 (2016-03-14 14:20:31+00:00): 444 N Wabash was already present as a building (sourced from Chicago Open Data). There are now two buildings at this location (with different numbers of levels too, 5 & 6). 

The use of highway=elevator with a building tag also looks odd (the render assumes the whole area is dedicated to an elevator). A more usual way of indicating that something has a given property, but that property if not explictly mapped, is to add property=yes. So I'd suggest changing the highway=elevator tag to elevator=yes (around 1000 uses mostly with building or building:part http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/elevator), or explictly mapping the positions of the elevators. Note that the former has also been used with wheelchair accessibility tags.
randy777 (2016-03-14 16:31:32+00:00): Mapping the individual accessible entrances lifts, elevators, offices, bathrooms and everything else is the reason for the attempts to tag this.  The project though is for the entire loop so we had some initial meetings with the City of Chicago Mayor's Office for People with Disabilities to plant the idea of improvements to the data on the portal.  Indeed what we are trying to tag here is a lift just inside the entrance at the southeast corner of this building which is meant to convey people of differing abilities to the level of the regular elevator lobby.  The initial problem for a person using a wheelchair is access to the intercom to get the entrance door open.
randy777 (2016-03-14 16:35:45+00:00): Let me give this some thought and come back to it.  My mind is also working on the various levels of tunnels, upper and lower streets and multiple addresses within buildings.
SK53 (2016-03-14 16:51:37+00:00): I'd suggest contacting the US Chapter of OSM direct. I'm aware of some sophisticated mapping for disabled access in various University campuses in the US: it's quite likely that at least one of these has been reported at a conference.

Otherwise checkout the German wheelmap site (http://wheelmap.org/en/map). The founder himself is wheelchair bound, and they are probably the most extensive provider of such access tags to OSM.

Mapping access indoors is still in its relative infancy on OSM. There is one excellent visualisation tool OpenLevelUp: http://openlevelup.net/. 

In general it best to start quite simply: map entrances with straightforward wheelchair tags (the associated description tag is essential as it can provide the specific info for each place). Using an elevator=yes tag is an example of this too: it provides usable info, but without having to micromap the building.
chnav (2016-04-09 07:17:18+00:00): Will revert back natural=water due to Caspian Sea geometry is not complete in regional data extracts and coastline not closed. Please discuss to local mappers first, before changing. Thanks.
jptolosa (2016-04-09 07:22:27+00:00): I didn't change anything. I just revert a changeset mine. Tagging is as before.
jptolosa (2016-04-09 07:33:17+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33818750
chnav (2016-04-09 07:42:57+00:00): The story was - you have added natural=water (you comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36561815
is reasonable), then another mapper delete coastline tag, I returned coastline back, then you delete water again ))
chnav (2016-04-09 07:48:17+00:00): Ok, my bad.
jptolosa (2016-04-09 07:57:31+00:00): Ok, but must be careful to add every island to multipolygon as inner ring to avoid a "flooding". I add recently like twenty islands mapped previously, but was not part of the relation.
R0bst3r (2016-03-15 16:40:12+00:00): Hi vramirez,
you've added a lot of buildings. Looks good so far. 
Only the english source key "source_en" is new to osm. "source:en" would be the defined key.
Do you want to adapt it?
Warin61 (2016-09-12 23:50:36+00:00): The Styx River is not the boundary of the Styx River State Forest .. nor do I think it is the boundary of the Cunnawarra NP... I have separated it off the Styx River State Forest. Will 'look at' the NP boundary later.
nevw (2016-09-17 09:01:09+00:00): Yes, looks ok.
Sunfishtommy (2016-04-23 16:23:02+00:00): Correction, (Source Iredell County GIS)
Allison P (2023-10-30 16:53:36+00:00): I see some unit ranges were converted into dates, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4059093781

Maybe it is an issue when preprocessing in Excel?
Sunfishtommy (2023-10-30 22:48:06+00:00): Yes i would say that is likely the reason for the date. I did not catch that when i was uploading.
Supaplex (2016-03-14 08:17:35+00:00): 您好，歡迎加開放街圖，由全世界參與者共同繪製的世界地圖。

一般關聯是拿來標示某一個行政區的範圍，不是用來標所在地行政區。標所在行政區的方式以填地址方式進行

有什麼繪製問題都歡迎來訊息，或是到臉書「OpenStreetMap台灣」(https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/)發問，謝謝
SomeoneElse (2016-09-04 22:17:11+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215452372 is "building=q" - presumably it should have been "school" or something?
Cheers,
Andy
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-09-04 22:54:31+00:00): Yes, fixed now, thanks for spotting this.
Sunfishtommy (2016-04-23 16:22:43+00:00): Correction, (Source Iredell County GIS)
GerdP (2017-08-27 06:46:17+00:00): Hi!
Please check typo(?) highway=street_sign on these two ways:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403574708
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403574710
Was it intended? Is it a traffic_sign=* ?
oba510 (2017-08-31 10:49:05+00:00): It's not a typo. This is a pair of monumental stone street signs (the kind that have the name of the street on them, not a traffic sign) that were built as a formal gateway to the small subdivision on the east side of College Ave. These kind of stone-column street signs are fairly common on the west coast in areas built around the 1900's-1930's but there isn't really a good tag for them currently, and most are still unmapped.
GerdP (2017-08-31 11:21:10+00:00): What do you think about historic=city_gate?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcity_gate
GerdP (2017-08-31 11:27:07+00:00): Ah, sorry, there is already a historic tag. I think the highway tag is obsolete here.
oba510 (2017-08-31 11:43:35+00:00): The highway=street_sign tag is there because it functions (both historically and currently) as a street sign. Looking at taginfo highway=street_sign is the most common tag for such features (even though it is undocumented).
GerdP (2017-08-31 11:54:25+00:00): That is true, the difference is that you have used the tag on a way, not on a node.
I also assume that many are mistagged traffic_sign=* or maybe tourism=information.
Question is why you want to map the sign,
I think the important thing is that the corresponding highway has the correct name tag.
user_5359 (2016-03-14 19:12:49+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. But I think I've discovered a small problem: Was really the name of the road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16938992/history) changed or did you just mark your address? I have revert you change! If you need help: you are welcome.
literan (2016-03-14 11:54:18+00:00): BB&Burgers это не фастфуд, а полноценное кафе-бистро, бургеры делают на заказ, дают нормальную посуду, а не бумажную упаковку, есть и иные блюда. Так что возвращаю amenity=cafe, согласно вики.
literan (2016-03-14 11:56:29+00:00): shop=kiosk неверный тег! у нас таких магазинов практически нет, они в основном в европе распространены. Поправлю на верные теги, если интересно, посмотрите, как правильно.
sergag (2016-03-14 17:34:25+00:00): А не подскажите на каком форуме лучше почитать про эти правила?
literan (2016-03-14 19:30:37+00:00): Форум у нас один: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21 - но вообще четких правил в проекте нет, есть своего рода соглашения, они описаны в вики, ссылка прям на этой странице есть
gpstracks (2016-03-14 21:20:27+00:00): Comunque non va cancellato.
(ripristinata way e cambiato tipo)
MKnight (2016-06-16 16:36:33+00:00): Moin,
Du hast hier 2 Tunnel übereinandergemalt, welcher ist richtig?
sigga (2016-06-19 07:36:38+00:00): wurde wohl schon bearbeitet, ist nur noch einer da
MKnight (2016-06-19 12:09:16+00:00): nein, sind beide noch da: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403587684 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400110756
sigga (2016-06-19 15:44:28+00:00): so hab das falsche gelöscht, ist damals übrigens ein LKW hängen geblieben.
flohoff (2016-03-14 22:41:11+00:00): Hi
du hast hier einen bollard eingetragen. Alle barriers brauchen eigentlich noch access tags für Fahrzeuge/Fortbewegungsmethoden die erlaubt sind. Also auf einem bollard sollte typischerweise ein foot=yes, bicycle=yes noch drauf sein.

Flo
HolgerJeromin (2016-03-15 07:22:12+00:00): Hab ich bei allen mir bekannten Pollern ergänzt:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37836446
manings (2016-03-14 08:28:20+00:00): Hi Nayanika,
You've tagged the whole are as building here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403590149/history

You should trace individual buildings.
shaikh solaiman (2019-03-27 16:37:08+00:00): hi thanks for mapping. I have reviewed your task, there were some extra buildings and few missing buildings. So I have fixed them all. Thanks.
Ramadyan (2019-03-28 05:18:53+00:00): Thank you sorry if i missed that
shaikh solaiman (2019-03-28 07:35:46+00:00): Its okay dear, keep changing. Thank you.
chnav (2016-03-14 13:38:30+00:00): Вы не поясните что за akb.arai и почему он был отмечен парком ? ))
Peda (2016-04-24 10:48:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
Peda (2016-04-24 10:50:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
Darek-J (2016-03-14 14:58:56+00:00): Ta droga nie jest prosta. Proszę również uważać przy przesuwaniu mapy, bo połączył pan przejście dla pieszych z budynkiem Kołakowskiego 36. Tym razem poprawiłem ale proszę następnym razem o więcej ostrożności: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37822825
pawekolo (2016-03-14 21:11:53+00:00): Właśnie zauważyłem to połączenie i chciałem naprawić, ale dopiero się uczę edycji i nie za bardzo wiedziałem jak .
Darek-J (2016-03-14 22:09:49+00:00): Rozumiem. W przyszłości może pan się zwrócić o pomoc na forum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
Ja również w razie czego służę pomocą. Pozdrawiam i życzę miłego mapowania.
zaizone (2016-03-14 21:49:40+00:00): Coïncidence ! Le jour ou je vais sur le terrain pour faire le relevé de cette nouvelle rue, je constate que tu as "ouvert la voie" quelques heures plus tôt ! J'ai cependant affiné un peu le tracé grâce à Mapillary : https://www.mapillary.com/map/s/SnQGAIoxX3mevoRcBOGo1w
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
Peda (2016-04-24 10:50:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
Peda (2016-04-24 10:50:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
Rodrigo Rega (2016-03-14 15:21:56+00:00): Hola Federico,

Te ha faltado añadir las etiquetas a los aparcamientos para personas de movilidad reducida. Serían las siguientes:
amenity=parking_space
parking_space=disabled

Las he añadido en este changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37823280

Aprovecho para darte la bienvenida a OpenStreetMap y las gracias por tu trabajo. Si tienes cualquier duda a la hora de editar el mapa ponte en contacto conmigo y si puedo te echo una mano gustosamente.

Un saludo!
FedericoCheda (2016-03-18 20:15:46+00:00): Gracias las estaba buscando. Voy a intentar actualizar todos los aparcamientos para personas con movilidad reducida de Lugo Centro y proximidades y no encontraba como etiquetarlo.
Rodrigo Rega (2016-03-19 19:37:43+00:00): Genial, es muy interesante tener localizados esos aparcamientos.
Hjart (2016-03-14 14:04:54+00:00): Så vidt jeg har forstået er der tale om 2 broer
Luzandro (2019-11-13 18:57:43+00:00): Hallo,

du hast hier einige boundary=administrative mit admin_level=10 angelegt, was in Österreich allerdings für Katastralgemeinden vorgesehen ist (was im Falle von Strasshof an der Nordbahn nur eine namens "Straßerfeld" wäre - https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strasshof_an_der_Nordbahn#Gemeindegliederung während die Gemeinde Schönkirchen-Reyersdorf aus den Katastralgemeinden "Schönkirchen" und "Reyersdorf" besteht).
Die Grenze zw. Bahnacker und Bartoschviertel schaut auch ziemlich willkürlich quer über die Häuser aus (und auch nicht direkt angrenzend), vermutlich weil es wie bei solchen Vierteln üblich keine exakte Grenze gibt, aber du kannst die Fläche dennoch stattdessen für den Place verwenden und den entsprechenden Node dafür löschen, wobei ich place auch eher von suburb auf neighbourhood ändern würde. Suburb ist schon noch einmal größer und wichtiger, entsprechend wird der Bahnacker aktuell von osm-carto auch prominenter angezeigt als die meisten umliegenden Ortschaften bzw. sogar prominenter als Strasshof selbst, das nur als village eingetragen ist.

Wie ich gerade gesehen habe, hast du dich offenbar an das deutsche Wiki gehalten, wo jemand geändert hat, dass place=suburb nicht für Flächen, sondern nur für Nodes geeignet ist und man eine Grenze mit admin_level=10 anlegen soll, aber letzteres trifft für Österreich definitiv nicht zu und dass place nicht für Flächen geeignet ist, stimmt schon einmal überhaupt nicht und entspricht auch nicht der englischen Version (es wurde anscheinend auch im deutschen Wiki nur bei diesem einen Wert für place geändert).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Tag:place%3Dsuburb&diff=1125443&oldid=1027900

LG Andreas
Hervé Saint-Amand (2016-03-15 08:09:47+00:00): Sorry about that :(
Polarbear (2016-03-14 20:19:32+00:00): Bonjour, there should be separate tags, "community_centre=meeting_room" and "community_centre:for=senior".
AmyCupcake (2016-05-30 10:58:00+00:00): editas un calle en inglaterra, ¿fue un accidente?
You edited a road in england, was this accidental?
user_5359 (2016-03-14 19:10:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For mark a building don't use area=yes, please use building=yes. And please check the streets and buildings on the property of the school (I use the BING aerial images).
AgusQui (2016-03-16 13:33:45+00:00): Ya está en funcionamiento este Metrobús?
Sergio Marcelo F (2016-03-16 13:39:38+00:00): Hola  AgusQui.. no por eso no puse las estaciones, pero los carriles que se pusieron ya están listos, en cuanto se habilite pongo las estaciones donde van. saludos
AgusQui (2016-03-16 13:56:19+00:00): Entonces pone los carriles como highway=construction, cuando se habilite highway=service, unclassified se usa para caminos rurales, fijate como están etiquetados los de Cabildo y Juan B. Justo. 
Las estaciones las podés ir mapeando, no hay problema, las ponés como construction:public_transport=platform, no ando por ahí así que no te puedo ayudar con el relevamiento, pero te puedo acomodar las relaciones de bondis cuando se habilite. 
Seguramente también hay que relevar/corregir las restricciones de giro de los particulares.
Sergio Marcelo F (2016-03-16 14:12:27+00:00): Uh gracias, estaria genial lo de las relaciones con las paradas (no la tengo muy clara con las relaciones ) y seguramente habrá que separarlas por linea, en la semana posiblemente pase a chusmear. ya puse las puse como "construction" y gracias por tu ayuda.. y tus consejos...
AgusQui (2016-03-16 15:28:32+00:00): Avisame cuándo esté inaugurado que corrijo los bondis y paradas, por experiencia propia cuando relevé el de Cabildo, no tomes nota de los carteles de las líneas en las estaciones hasta que esté terminado, suelen ponerlos de prueba o cambiarlos a último momento.
CloCkWeRX (2016-03-14 14:40:27+00:00): Why are you mapping forest? This little or nothing to do with the imagery or task
CloCkWeRX (2016-03-14 14:55:20+00:00): Please stop mapping like this, what you are contributing is not as per the HOT task or the actual content on the ground. Please ask your instructor or mapping party organiser to stop the activity and discuss with the HOT-OSM mailing list.
geo_prof (2016-03-17 11:01:46+00:00): okay we stop with exercises
CloCkWeRX (2016-03-14 14:42:44+00:00): Why are you mapping like this, it has no relationship to the imagery or HOT task
CloCkWeRX (2016-03-14 14:47:43+00:00): Don't map like this; the task doesn't require forests
CloCkWeRX (2016-03-14 14:52:49+00:00): Don't map like this; it's wrong and will need to be reverted. Can you tell your instructor or mapping party host that this is inappropriate and to stop the activity.
geo_prof (2016-03-17 12:29:24+00:00): ok! understood will refer you but how many trees ... :-)
SomeoneElse (2016-03-17 11:35:48+00:00): Just checking - are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/403656398 is a public footpath?  It seems just to go to the church.
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-03-17 13:28:39+00:00): oops, no it is just a footpath to access the church
SomeoneElse (2016-03-17 14:13:01+00:00): Thanks - and thanks for doing all the schools hereabouts, too.
NickKr (2016-03-18 07:57:40+00:00): Зачем делать изменения улиц которые еще не прошли утверждение?
dudka (2016-03-18 08:11:29+00:00): я оставил ссылку в комментарии? откройте и прочитайте ее
dudka (2016-03-18 08:17:05+00:00): ось вам ще одне посилання якщо першого недостатньо: https://kievcity.gov.ua/done_img/f/%D0%A0%D0%9A%D0%9C%D0%93-125-1-19022016.PDF
NickKr (2016-03-18 14:19:59+00:00): На 18 марта 2016 документ не имеет под собой ни какой юридической силы. Название улицы ещё старое и называется Ильича. Приведите хоть один нормативный подписанный документ согласно которого вы изменили название этой улицы. Если документ отправлен на рассмотрение это не означает что уже надо менять название улицы.
dudka (2016-03-18 14:27:37+00:00): Какое рассмотрение? Мер подписал распоряжение! Это и есть нормативный документ.
NickKr (2016-03-18 14:56:24+00:00): Что написано в документе по первой ссылке напротив улицы Ильича - "Рішення ухвалено Київрадою" или "Видано розпорядження міського голови"? Киеврада может не утвердить подписанный документ мэром и что тогда. С какого момента данный подписанный документ наберет свою силу?
dudka (2016-03-18 15:08:47+00:00): Вы читали документ про декоммунизацию? У Киеврады было полгода для переименования улиц, но она переименовала только часть. Остальные - не успела. Теперь пришло время мера. Теперь улицы переименовываются его распоряжением и Киеврада, время которой вышло, уже не принимает в этом процессе никакого участия.
dudka (2016-03-18 15:11:27+00:00): http://www.memory.gov.ua/news/dekomunizatsiya-trivae-povnovazhennya-pereishli-do-miskikh-goliv-ta-parlamentu
dgitto (2016-05-02 21:14:20+00:00): Ciao, c'era già il municipio. Tolgo il tag duplicato (amenity=townhall) al building, altrimenti risultano due municipi
mariotomo (2019-11-29 17:47:42+00:00): hi Absaroka.  I've been removing loads of such no-u-turn restrictions, that were not supported by a physical traffic sign.  can you help me with your contributions?  are you helping a software deal with restrictions, or are you mapping things that exist?
Absaroka (2019-11-29 20:29:58+00:00): I did not confirm the existence of signs. I only confirmed that a u turn would be impossible in those locations from personal familiarity. Should I only mark ones with an actual sign?