piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-04-25 16:01:13+00:00): Oke... maar 
tracktype=grade4 hoort bij een highway=track voor bv bosvoertuigen. Dus ook verwijderen. 
De vraag is dus of het wel een footway is of toch een track,.. geschikt voor voertuigen met vier wielen. Dan klopt grade4 voor zand.
koortom tracktype verwijderen of er weer een track van maken. Up to you
AdVerburg (2020-04-26 14:01:48+00:00): Ik vermoed dat je https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dboardwalk bedoelt.
eggie (2020-04-26 14:18:13+00:00): Die boardwalks zijn gewoon paden.. die zijn goed... maar buiten de vlonders kunnen footways of path's geen tracktype hebben.. Dat hoort bij highway=track.
eggie (2020-04-26 14:19:16+00:00): Die tracktype tag is nog een erfenis van de vorige situatie...
SimoneJ (2020-04-26 19:46:42+00:00): Ik zal ze doorspreken met Natuurmon. Dan weet ik zeker welk verkeer er mag komen
eda_n (2020-05-05 21:07:18+00:00): Coucou, j'ai vérifié un peu tes contributions :)
Donc pour les caméras, on met objet de la surveillance : public plutôt que outdoor quand il s'agit de caméras de la ville, et zone de surveillance : town dans ce cas. Si c'est des caméras privées, on met indoor ou outdoor selon que c'est dans l'immeuble ou à l'entrée de l'immeuble (ils ont pas le droit de surveiller plus loin après). Voilà :)
ininow (2020-05-05 23:49:15+00:00): Salut à toi ! Merci pour les vérifs. Du coup j'arrive pas à trouver comment modifier c que j'ai renseigné, et j'en viens même à me demander s'ils apparaissent toujours. Je checkerai les pages d'aide dans les jours à venir
:)
eggie (2020-04-25 15:54:16+00:00): Ziet er goed uit
treestryder (2023-03-02 03:48:22+00:00): The canoe key is now the generic term for all human powered boating. So, this would be a canoe=put_in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:canoe#whitewater_to_canoe

You might be interested in the new OpenStreetBrowser Paddling categories.
https://openstreetbrowser.org/#map=17/42.71769/-84.55983&categories=paddling_amenities,paddling_hazards,paddling_routes
Constable (2020-04-26 07:30:07+00:00): Ciao, perché hai confertito ques'area in parco giochi?
Andando a memoria, non ricordo nessuna struttura per bambini, nella parte vicino via Falcone dovrebbe esserci una stazione del percorso vita, ma nulla di più.
Grazie
Constable (2020-04-26 07:30:14+00:00): *convertito
wireguy (2020-04-25 16:04:16+00:00): welcome to osm SMC!   Just a tip...you can square up the building corners by selecting it and pressing the q key.
Britzz (2020-04-25 20:31:26+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.

Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : bravo pour votre contribution.
Vous avez ajouté l'église comme un point alors qu'elle existait comme bâtiment, j'ai repris vos informations (le nom) et l'ai ajouté au bâtiment pré-existant (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89028066)

Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).
Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84109164
MKnight (2020-05-03 16:20:06+00:00): Moin,
magst du Dir das nochmal anschauen? 
Speziell w224086200 und w795990581
j1scad (2020-05-04 16:17:29+00:00): Through korrigiert, Danke.
Frans S (2020-04-25 17:19:34+00:00): Hi. I reviewed your changeset.
I ran the find non squared buildings script and found 12 buildings not proper squared. I squared them
After running the validation tool 2 duplicated nodes were found. Fixed by the validation tool
1 non squared building reported, Also fixed by the validation tool.
See this webpage what I have done
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=84114915
Best regards
Frans S (2020-04-26 08:04:56+00:00): Hi Shabini. About these 2 buildings you mapped and tagged.
If you take a close look they appear (to me) as old and overgrown, so not worth to map anyhow. There are more of these artefacts.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84109610
camelCaseNick (2020-04-25 17:37:42+00:00): Hey,
you have added an invalid wikidata tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279287705. I think you meant the same as the one from the relation. AfaIk Wikipedia and Wikidata tags however should not be added to the individual ways/nodes, when they match an existing relation.
CamelCaseNick
Jay May (2020-04-26 09:56:31+00:00): Hi Nick,
Yes, I meant the same as the one from the relation.
About the Wikipedia and Wikipedata you mentioned above ... I've gotten contradictory theories in the past, so now I prefer always putting them both in the relation and in the watercourse. The Wikidata will always be the same, but for Wikipedia, I always privilege the local official language if the river goes through different countries.
Jay May (2020-04-26 09:57:45+00:00): P.S.: Just corrected this mistake thanks to you ;)
5m4u9 (2020-04-26 03:44:20+00:00): hola, yo también confundía ridge con arista, en realidad estos lugares son "natural=arete"... si ves un lugar afilado es arete si ves algo redondeado o que haya un camino arriba es "ridge"

en la paz es más comun arete que ridge por las carcavas, en el valle de las animas y parque de la revolución

en el mapa ahora se ve una diferencia entre arete y ridge, arete son puntitos con más grosor como mostrando lugares afilados mientras que ridge son puntitos dispersos desde el centro
Caleidoscopic (2020-04-26 11:29:47+00:00): Gracias! Esto ya me lo habías explicado y lo olvidé porwye no está disponible en el ID directamente, corregiré las adiciones, muchas gracias.
pyram (2020-10-07 17:54:34+00:00): Hi Keksoline666,

darf man fragen, was das genau sein soll:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7391537115
In Fernabrünst gibt es sicherlich keinen Supermarkt (zumindest gab es die letzten Jahre dort keinen). Kann es sein, dass das lediglich so eine Art Hofladen ist?:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop=farm?uselang=de
oder nur ein Verkaufsautomat, da opening_hours=24/7
=> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dvending_machine = food/milk?
Die Bezeichnung "Selbsbedienungshütte" dürfte sich mit unserer Definition von name sehr wahrscheinlich nicht decken. Dafür besser "description" nutzen.
VA00 (2020-05-09 05:34:36+00:00): Coś poszatkowany ten szlak.
Maciej9 (2020-05-09 09:40:44+00:00): Na razie tyle udało mi się dopasować. Z oznakowaniem w terenie jest lipa, tylko gdzieniegdzie występuje. Luki zostawiłem tam gdzie nie miałem pewności, żeby nie wprowadzać w błąd. Liczę, że z czasem uda się uzupełnić. Mapa od Nadleśnictwa nie rozwiewa wątpliwości https://chrzanow.katowice.lasy.gov.pl/documents/18176/2718687/szlaki+konne+2015.pdf/12bc6ee8-6314-4063-801d-c9da42d2c82a
treestryder (2023-01-15 20:45:08+00:00): Saw your note, "Technically it seems this should be tagged as highway=path as cycleways seem to be limited to ones attached to roads."

Yes. Path is the generic term for any non-motorized way. A cycleway is the equivalent of a highway just for bicycles. See the Michigan Wiki page for a mapping cheat sheet. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Common_Tagging_Schemes

Also, many Michigan mappers have been meeting together each month. Meeting information can be found in the Community section. Hope to see you around.
Richard (2020-09-04 11:42:57+00:00): Just commenting to say this is really excellent mapping!
eggie (2020-04-25 16:48:27+00:00): Tip.. Ik heb nu  niet gecheckt, maar mochten er wandel, fiets, ruiterroutes lopen dan nooit wegen doorverbinden, maar opgeknipt laten. De routerelatie gaat anders stuk.
In principe nooit wegen doorverbinden... ook zonder routes niet. 
Gr Eggie
Marco Nell (2020-04-26 09:39:21+00:00): OK, zal ik niet meer doen. Volgens mij zijn er in dat gedeelte van het bos geen routes, maar misschien heb ik iets gemist. Je krijgt toch een foutmelding als je zoiets doet?
Groeten, Marco
eggie (2020-04-26 10:36:31+00:00): Even geen idee of er routes lopen Heb niet gekeken. .. Ik heb in JOSM bij de 'kaarttekenstijlen' de OV, fiets- en wandelknooproutes aanstaan. Dat valt het direct op. Een aanrader. 
Aan heel veel routes mankeert van alles dus  die relatiefoutmeldingen staat er al vaak, maar hebben meestal niets met de eigen edit van doen. 
Doorverbinden doe ik wel eens in één straatdeel als iets er onlogisch uitziet. Verder is het handig ook bij wegen zonder routes de boel opgeknipt te laten. Dat scheelt de route-experts veel werk bij het inleggen van nieuwe routes. 
Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-04-26 10:37:59+00:00): Wanneer een route door de war is of onderbroken wordt vaak weer achter je rug hersteld door de route experts.
Die houden dat in de gaten met https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/
Je moet maar eens kijken.
unodecrespos (2020-04-26 11:12:56+00:00): Hola, buenas, he visto que has estado haciendo varias importaciones en Viñegra de Moraña. La verdad es que lo tenía preparado para hacerlo yo, que soy de la zona, pero bueno, cualquier contribución es bienvenida. Te aconsejo que sigas las normas de la wiki en lo referente a las correcciones que hay que hacer al importar (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Catastro_espa%C3%B1ol/Importaci%C3%B3n_de_edificios/Gu%C3%ADa_de_importaci%C3%B3n/Correcciones). Además, por esta zona el catastro y los números de las casas no son nada fiables y hay que ir mirándolos uno por uno con las fotos de las casas. En caso de duda es mejor dejar el número sin poner (al menos es lo que yo hago para ir a comprobarlo en persona cuando esto pase). Un saludo
Santi2222 (2020-04-29 06:48:37+00:00): Hola, la verdad es que no era mi intención completar la importación entera de esta localidad, más bien conocer el proceso y las directrices de cómo se debe llevar a cabo en general. Si me da por seguir por esta zona tendré en cuenta lo que dices de las direcciones (en lo poco que he importado había bastantes edificios mal etiquetados, desplazados o que ya no existen directamente).
Saludos

(Perdón por la tardanza en responder, no había visto el correo de aviso del comentario)
Mike Baggaley (2020-05-04 21:59:03+00:00): Hi, ways 796240179 and 796240180 added in this changeset have bicycle and horse allowed but pedestrians are prohibited. Is this correct? Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
CantrayJDW (2020-05-05 06:36:22+00:00): Thanks Mike,
Finger trouble. Getting better as experience grows. It is a pity that the default isn't Scottish outdoor access, or maybe I can change it?
Corrected now.

And I will recheck all the paths/tracks in High Wood (Petty) when I have finished mapping them.

Regards,
highflyer74 (2021-01-05 07:41:11+00:00): Moin! Du warst hier noch ganz neu bei OSM, aber mir es gerade ins Auge: bitte alles nur einmal mappen. In diesem Fall wurde MediaMobil korrekt als Node im Gebäude platziert, aber auch noch am Gebäude selbst hinzugefügt. Letzteres ist dann nicht gut. Ich habe es entsprechend geändert.

Viele Grüße!
Jrachi (2020-04-29 14:28:11+00:00): operator=Provincia di Torino
?
Non esiste più. Forse intendevi "Città Metropolitana"?
Jrachi (2020-04-29 14:29:28+00:00): name="Ponte di legno" e di ferro sono descrizioni non nomi.
Se vuoi inserire le caratteristiche vedi la pagina bridge sulla wiki
Andrea996 (2020-04-29 14:34:36+00:00): Sono nomi dei ponti, nonostante sembrano la descrizione del materiale che effettivamente è così
Ma i ponti si chiamano ponte di ferro e ponte di legno
Andrea996 (2020-04-29 14:34:57+00:00): operator=Provincia di Torino
Non lo trovo in che geometria è ?
Jrachi (2020-04-29 14:43:47+00:00): L'ho visto su un guidepost.
Al bivio 552-552A
Nodo: 4397593175
Ciao
Andrea996 (2020-04-29 14:45:50+00:00): Ah, si il cartello porta ancora la dicitura Provincia di Torino lo aggiorno in Città Metropolitana
user_5359 (2020-04-26 16:00:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
BACINO=0
CODICE=5662
FNODE_=10160
G10=1
GRAFIDRO_=10874
GRAFIDRO_I=5662
LENGTH=2266.51531
LPOLY_=0
NOME10=R. MAOMETTO
NOME100=R. MAOMETTO
P10=1
P100=1
RAMO=0
RPOLY_=0
TIPO=1
TNODE_=10757
TYPARC=0
VISIBILE=0
Palolo (2020-05-07 15:27:35+00:00): @[Joey Tam] we appreciate the help mapping Taznania. Please follow the directions for road classifications. There are no new Primary highways to be mapped.
aixbrick (2020-04-26 08:22:40+00:00): Wie in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84117161. Bitte schließe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60131741 wieder an die Wendestelle an, vorausgesetzt, dass das auch in Wirklichkeit der Fall ist.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-04-27 07:08:41+00:00): Ah, super! Danke!

Die A7 nach der Baustelle hatte ich zu meinen OSM-Anfangszeiten letztes Jahr angefangen anzupassen.

Ich hatte auch eine Note erstellt. Evtl. kann die jetzt geschlossen werden?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1904610

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
j1scad (2020-04-30 12:01:04+00:00): Die Note könnte wohl geschlossen werden. 

Schöne Grüße
Pavelfantik (2020-04-26 12:13:27+00:00): Смотрел онлайн экскурсию от Кулевича и тут бац и правки в Переселке:)
4004 (2020-04-26 22:56:13+00:00): совпадение? не думаю.

вообще там конечно надо проехать в мапиллари хоть отснять, как и у городничанки под коложей
mueschel (2020-04-28 10:57:09+00:00): Hi,
the tag 'socket:css' is not used in other places. Could you check the wiki for the proper name of the socket?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7446814136

Thanks!
sloerunner (2020-05-31 11:21:04+00:00): Hi mueschel,
I’m passing this back to you to update OpenstreetMap.   As far as I can tell the charging station has a CCS output.  The Charging station is a Raption 50 CCS CHA T2C63. I have downloaded the specification.  I have photos.
Adjacent is another charging station.  This is a Post eVolve Smart T by Circontrol SA. Input power is 3P+N+PE 64A 44kW.  It has 2 x Type2 sockets.  I have the specification for that charger too.  I have photos.
There are 3 marked parking bays. Sign says max stay is 2 hours.
Thanks.
mueschel (2020-05-31 12:35:06+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the response! 
The issue is, that "CCS" is not a single type of socket, by several different ones.
In the UK it should be either type2 or type_combo (if I'm not mistaken) , In other regions other connectors are used, but also named CCS.

The wiki has images for you to compare:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:socket
gendy54 (2023-02-18 18:03:35+00:00): Bonjour Hydrel,

Juste pour info, les tags addr:post_code et addr:city sont redondants et n'ont pas besoin d'être rajoutés sur les objets, puisqu'ils sont déjà géolocalisés dans un ensemble géographique (commune, dép, région,...)
Hydrel (2023-02-18 20:28:40+00:00): Bonjour, D'accord je ne savais pas, en est il de même pour les tags addr:housenumber et addr:street je les vois aussi retirés parfois? il y a une page wiki pour expliciter tout ça ? De même les noms de rue en France doivent elles suivrent la typographie de l'imprimerie nationale comme sur wikipédia ? Parfois je vois "Boulevard Victor Hugo" et "Boulevard Victor-Hugo"...
RicoElectrico (2020-04-25 20:42:28+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za dodanie sklepu do mapy. Poprawiłem jedną rzecz: oprócz punktu oznaczającego sklep dodałeś jego nazwę do budynku - skasowałem tę nazwę, bo sklep nie zajmuje całego budynku.
user_5359 (2020-04-25 20:03:04+00:00): Hello! Please use the OSM standard keys !
grouper (2020-04-28 22:01:52+00:00): Hi john2660, why did you tag single family houses as offices?
mike140 (2021-09-13 07:15:24+00:00): На церковь этот дом что-то не похож, и по адресу не совпадает. Скорее всего церковь находится здесь: 49.95694 35.94510
Glassman (2020-04-25 19:55:26+00:00): TIP: Also correct the road name as well as the houses. If you need help, let me know.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84116433
emvee (2022-05-15 20:34:33+00:00): Hi Komяpa,

I had a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8250313/history#map=17/53.89998/27.55048 but after this change this relation is missing a via and to member and has only a from member.

Can you correct that?

Greetings!
eggie (2020-04-25 18:23:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review.. Volgens mij si niet alles goed gegaan. Een bedrijf taggen we bij op de adresnode. Dus niet op het gebouw zelf. Alle gebouwen zijn import van het Kadaster en kun je beter niet veranderen. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-25 18:34:41+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik weer conform de BGT hersteld.
Staat hier inmiddels dan een ander gebouw?
MVG,
eggie
lambrix (2020-04-25 18:37:05+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
allereerst bedankt voor je hulp!
en nee, er is geen ander gebouw.
Mvg.
eggie (2020-04-25 18:51:50+00:00): Mocht craft=  niet zichtbaar worden als naam dan zou je office=company nog kunnen taggen.

Website en phone nog toegevoegd. 
De info staat op de adresnode. Er hoort niets op het gebouw te staan. 
MVG,
Eggie
lambrix (2020-04-25 19:07:39+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
ik heb 'office=company' toegevoegd, hopelijk is het dadelijk te zien op de kaart.
Dankjewel voor je hulp.
mvg
eggie (2020-04-25 19:09:34+00:00): Yep.. het rendert al. :)
eggie (2020-04-25 19:11:06+00:00): Even CTRL F5  .. je cache leegmaken...  dan zie je het. .. of beetje in en uitzoomen.
lambrix (2020-04-25 19:18:57+00:00): Super, dankjewel Eggie voor je hulp
highflyer74 (2020-05-14 20:43:04+00:00): Moin!

An dem von Dir hier gemappten Wasserweg stimmt das Tagging nicht. Kannst Du Dir das nocheinmal ansehen?

Gemappt wurde water=drain mit waterway=stream. Das passt nicht zusammen. water=drain gibt es nicht und water=* wird auch nur in Verbindung mit natural=water verwendet (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:water). Was vermutlich passen würde ist https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway.

Kleiner Tipp: Versuche mal, JOSM zum Editieren zu nutzen. JOSM hätte Dich vor dem Hochladen vor dieser Diskrepanz gewarnt.

Auch freuen sich Deine Mit-Mapper über https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Wenn Du Hilfe brauchst, melde Dich gern!
dx125 (2020-05-15 05:05:31+00:00): Der Kollege wurde bereits auf fehlende Changeset-Kommentare hin gewiesen, auch JOSM ist ihm schon empfohlen worden.
matchman (2020-05-15 05:40:57+00:00): Danke, habe Josm bereits geladen und werde die Tage die Tags korrigieren.
jqngarcia (2020-04-26 12:26:03+00:00): Hola, no se permiten vandalismo en OSM, vamos a proceder a eliminar tu edición
aixbrick (2020-04-26 08:21:18+00:00): Du hast hier die gemappte Wendefläche gelöscht. Dadurch geht mindestens die Information, dass es eine größere Fläche am Ende der Straße zum Wenden gibt, verloren. Bitte setze stattdessen zumindest auf dem letzten Punkt der Straße highway=turning_circle. Grundsätzlich sollte nichts gelöscht werden, was nachweislich vorhanden ist.
Mi123456 (2020-04-26 08:48:57+00:00): Sorry, mein Fehler. Kannst Du mir bitte helfen, diesen wieder rückgängig zu machen. Besten Dank.
aixbrick (2020-04-26 09:25:16+00:00): Ich habe beide Wendestellen (also auch die in der Hubertusstraße) wiederhergestellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84134858.
Mi123456 (2020-04-26 09:34:37+00:00): Nochmals vielen Dank dafür.
trial (2021-01-20 20:16:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97859339
Frans S (2020-04-26 09:10:56+00:00): Hi Shabani
Was this a validation Check?
The bigger buildings between the highways are not mapped at all except for a few,
Can you manage that?
Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84117250
Anton Khorev (2021-05-16 07:39:24+00:00): How do you know about this baseball pitch?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/796269575/

It's not visible on Bing/Maxar/Esri imagery. It's not present on Google/Waze/Here maps. There's no Mapillary photos. You are unlikely to have been any particular place you're editing because your edits span too large areas. It's not even possible to guess that there's a pitch unlike what you've been asked in this changeset discussion:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83111979  
- you put there a ford, got asked how do you know that there's a ford, answered that you wanted a bridge, although it's still not clear how do you know that there was a bridge.

You also add hospitals and schools. What is the source for these edits? I can't completely ignore them because you sometimes put addr:street tag with your street names on them.

Anton Khorev  
Data Working Group
BigKev97 (2021-05-22 03:19:20+00:00): Because the satellite upgrades the photo and I thought that they are going to build the field on a town.

And about the hospitals and schools I was going to add it, but there were names on it on the location symbol and so I converted it into a boundary space.
Anton Khorev (2021-05-22 17:29:50+00:00): This changeset has "imagery_used" tag with "Bing aerial imagery". If you look at the current Bing imagery, do you see the pitch on it? Do you think that the pitch exists now?

I'm asking about this baseball pitch because I noticed that you often add "sport" tags to pitches. The question again is how do you know them. It could be difficult to see the pitch in enough detail to determine its sport tag value. For example, is this a baseball court? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/796269610 Is it a pitch at all? But with baseball pitches you probably can't go wrong because of their distinct shape. So I decided to take a look myself at this baseball pitch and I don't see any.

For comparison, with something like this
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129037224
it's possible to guess that there's a baseball pitch.
Anton Khorev (2021-05-22 17:42:49+00:00): About the hospitals - I know that you are sometimes converting nodes to areas or areas to other areas but that's not always the case. Let's look at this hospital:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/796269603
There wasn't anything at this place before your edit. It's possible to see this by running this query:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/17Dn
So you couldn't know about the hospital by looking at the existing data. How did you know about it then?
BigKev97 (2021-05-23 00:19:04+00:00): 1. The baseball files was added because of the vegetation that owners of the complex did not remove the vegetation that it was growing over the past years.

2. The boundary of the hospital is added because of a proposed expansion of the area.
Mike Baggaley (2020-05-04 23:32:47+00:00): Hi, please note that access=agricultural means that anyone with an agricultural vehicle can use it. It does not mean that it is for use by the farmer. If it is for the farmer's use only then access=private is the correct tag. As there are almost no places in the UK where access=agricultural is the correct tag, can you please review the tracks edited in this change?

Thanks,
Mike
Hi-5ers (2020-05-09 11:13:20+00:00): Thanks for this help. We were following the definitions made by someone else but can  now see the logic in what you are suggesting. We have made the changes.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-04-26 13:06:54+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Puoi dirimi come mai hai etichettato diversi path con layer=-1? Ciao, Andrea
Car_Ma (2020-04-29 17:40:24+00:00): Ciao Andrea e grazie per il benvenuto.
Credo di aver sbagliato, posso correggerlo? In che modo?
Ho fatto qualche altro inserimento non vorrei aver fatto lo stesso errore. 
Grazie
Carlo
Andrea Musuruane (2020-04-29 17:42:59+00:00): Ciao Carlo. Credo di avere già corretto io nel frattempo. Facendo una query con overpass non trovo altri casi. Ciao, Andrea
ianlopez1115 (2020-07-09 10:45:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87760146 where the changeset comment is: [Balbalan and Pinukpuk] Rolled-back parts of changesets 84117507 and 84130470 because source data license is incompatible with OSM. For details: github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/67
Shaun das Schaf (2020-05-04 11:43:38+00:00): Hallo Chimbofranz,

wie kommst du auf den Wert "permit" für den access-Tag dieses Weges https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794515381 ? Ist das dort wirklich so ausgeschildert mitten im Wald?

Viele Grüße,
Shaun das Schaf
osmviborg (2020-04-25 19:18:34+00:00): Skal det ikke være 'destination' fremfor 'description'?