piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
laurent-38 (2022-09-10 10:40:13+00:00): Bonjour Mickaël,
En fait, j'ai corrigé la T20 hier car il y avait une autre rupture au niveau de la D517. Pour ce giratoire, les 3 segments étaient dans le bon ordre, mais déplacés dans la relation (ainsi que l'entrée et la sortie). 

Et par ailleurs, l'itinéraire piéton a aussi été corrigé : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125996269.
PolyDunami (2022-08-31 19:15:01+00:00): Source: City of Surrey Mapping Online System
StephaneP (2025-11-07 13:30:01+00:00): Salut,

L'école est déjà cartographiée avec le noeud https://www.osm.org/node/2296228858
Ajouter amenity=school sur l'emprise créé un doublon.
J'ai corrigé.

Stf
E de Wit (2022-08-31 22:01:47+00:00): Vaderlandsch woordenboek 'XIX DEEL' door Jacobus Kok (1788), p. 444-445.
Geparafraseerd:
"De eerste beginselen van de stad (Harns) moeten gezocht worden in het Dorp Almenum welke destijds op zichzelf stond.
En hoewel ouder dan de stad (Harns) zelf binnen haar muren is getrokken en daardoor verdwenen is.
In de jaren 1234 schijnt met de aangrenzende Stinzen en Buurten vergroot en uitgebreid te hebben: zodat deze met Almenum één Dorp uitmaakten.
't wel om overheersing van beide genoemde geslachten, 't zijn dan onder de naam Harlingen of Harns welke men Stads Privileges heeft gegeven om deze in aanzien te doen toenemen."

Grappig, lijkt dus te kloppen.

Ik ben wel benieuwd hoe men op 'Saltryp' is gekomen, deze naam is niet terug te vinden in de historische stukken. Alleen in de 
Leeuwarder courant van 05-06-1992, p. 8 waar men Almenum (blijkbaar) ook op de verkeerde plek heeft getekend.
JeroenHoek (2022-09-01 08:41:45+00:00): Almenum hier was een vernoeming naar het historische Almenum. Deze buurt lag ook in de hemrik van Almenum.

Ik heb navraag gedaan bij de gemeente.

Topotijdreis toont Almenum op de juiste plek ten zuidoosten van het centrum van Harlingen. Op zich zou die als locality daar kunnen; de naam is bekend genoeg ook door de vele vernoemingen (straat, verzorgingshuis, dit buurtschap voorheen).
JeroenHoek (2022-09-01 08:42:33+00:00): Overigens komt de naam Saltryp al wel voor in Harlingen in De Spiker als 'Saltryperlaan'.
JeroenHoek (2022-09-01 08:44:00+00:00): De Almenumerweg is qua locatie trouwens een betere vernoeming. Ik ben benieuwd of de motivatie van de straatnamencommissie (of wat Harlingen maar heeft) wat meer uitleg geeft.
JeroenHoek (2022-09-12 09:58:38+00:00): Bijzonder antwoord van de gemeente:

> Het buurtschapbord 'Saltryp' heeft geen wettelijke status en wordt daarom niet gepubliceerd.
clay_c (2023-03-30 22:08:03+00:00): Hi Himké,

This changeset introduces a new value of network, CA:NS:H:toll. Currently, OpenStreetMap-Americana [1] renders shields for the network values CA:transcanada, CA:NS:H, CA:NS:T and CA:NS:R. Does this segment of Highway 104 have signage different from other Trans-Canada or 100-series highways in Nova Scotia? If so, I'd like to add it to our shield rendering inventory.

[1] https://zelonewolf.github.io/openstreetmap-americana/#map=9.11/45.4626/-63.6752
brian_bancroft (2022-09-07 21:21:44+00:00): Thanks for the work around forrest field!
Noirdavinci (2022-09-16 19:59:24+00:00): Stop hacking my account, warning ⚠️
EneaSuper (2022-09-01 08:10:31+00:00): Ciao, volevo farti sapere che questo carcere non è solo femminile, ma misto 🙂
ivanbranco (2022-09-01 16:29:32+00:00): E' giusto che il nome sia duplicato sia sulla prigione che sull'area militare?
EneaSuper (2022-09-01 16:39:57+00:00): Mh, bella domanda, è una cosa che ho fatto io ma della quale non ho tenuto conto...
AlexanderF (2022-09-24 19:34:01+00:00): Hallo bigbug21,
ist das der richtige Bahnübergang?
Ich verstehe den referenzierten Artikel so, dass das der Bahnübergang Tübinger Straße in Holzgerlingen ist und nicht in Böblingen.
bigbug21 (2022-09-27 20:55:22+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, AlexanderF. Habe es eben korrigiert.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-31 20:38:25+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contributions! If you've tagged all the speed bumps separately, you shouldn't add the `traffic_calming=yes` tag to the road as well, that's double-tagging a feature. Would you mind removing that please? Thanks!
mariotomo (2022-08-31 20:52:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mariotomo/diary/399256
VLD521 (2022-10-31 12:45:43+00:00): Thank you very much for your response. I am glad I could help.
jcr83 (2022-09-01 07:40:20+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez remis en place cette piste : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088413574.
Avez-vous vérifié sur place si c'est toujours une piste ? Car d'après le commetaire de ce changeset :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125250618 , ce morceau de piste a été remplacé par une aire de pique-nique.
cOSMografix (2022-09-02 07:45:11+00:00): Bonjour
La piste fait 4m de large :) visible sur BDOrtho IGN. 
De plus ce n'est pas une aire de pique nique tout l'année (tag à ajouté :) ), ce sont des tables placées en bord de piste pour la saison estivale. 
Elle n'etaient d'ailleurs pas placées comme sur l'image  aérienne. Supprimer cette piste est une curieuse erreur et fait faire un détour pour les itinéraires à pied.
++
mcliquid (2022-09-04 19:47:01+00:00): Jetzt sieht es wieder sehr gut, vielen Dank!
BCNorwich (2022-09-02 06:41:06+00:00): Hi, I see you've tagged several areas and highways as access=no, this tag means there is no access whatever to any form of traffic. This seems clearly incorrect here.

Guidance for tagging access and restricted access is shown here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access  

If you're not sure of the access or restrictions then it's better to tag the area or highway as access=private.

Regards Bernard.
thx811 (2022-09-03 20:49:06+00:00): Hi Bernard, I tagged these ways as access=no as they form part of a military base where access to the public is restricted. The "List of possible values" table at the guidance page says access=no should be used when "General public access is prohibited. Stronger interdiction than private. Examples: A fully closed road; A restricted military facility." Unless I've misunderstood the guidance, I would consider access=no to be the appropriate tag. Regards Thx811
sander79 (2023-05-01 09:13:55+00:00): Waarom is de eenrichtingsverkeer verwijderd van de Seizoentuinenlaan ? Dit is niet correct. Zou je dit kunnen terugdraaien ?
emvee (2023-05-01 21:03:27+00:00): Bedankt voor de melding.

Dat heb ik gedaan aan de hand van de Verkeersbordenkaart, https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=52.089735615&lng=5.015036166&z=19

Het stuk tussen de Zomertuinlaan en de Lentetuinlaan zou wel nog éénrichtingsverkeer moeten zijn maar de rest van de Seizoentuinlaan niet zover je op de borden afgaat.

Dat stuk heb ik bijgewerkt, zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=135591032
sander79 (2023-05-02 17:43:17+00:00): Bedankt voor je feedback en bedankt voor de site, ziet er handig uit.

Je wijziging klopt nog niet.
- alles is nog steeds oneway=no terwijl dit yes moet zijn. (fietsers uitgezonderd)
Het eerste deel is ook eenrichtingsverkeer. (op de betreffende site zie je dat daar toch ook terugkomen met een c3 bord)
emvee (2023-05-03 20:56:45+00:00): "alles" is niet éénrichtingsverkeer, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090850951 is éénrichtingsverkeer, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161745961 niet.

Die laatste heb ik geen éénrichtingsverkeer gemaakt omdat er geen bord staat in de buurt van  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6034792019 behalve een G7 voetgangersbord.
sander79 (2023-05-04 10:15:37+00:00): - op die node hoeft ook geen bord te staan omdat autos vanuit de Zomertuinlaan richting het zuiden rijden
- in het begin van de Seizoentuinenlaan staat een bord C3
ncoy1234 (2023-02-08 00:25:00+00:00): I am not sure what you changed because I am not really familiar with open street map, but you changed part of the Endless Mountain Trail and it no longer shows up on services like Alltrails, Komoot, etc
DUGA (2023-02-08 01:00:30+00:00): I removed the trail related tags because I spot several issues. I did not delete anything, but:

The trail is a poorly drawn segment that was substantially converted from an abandoned railway by a banned troll NE2. This “trail” never has correct geometries and it introduces several issues:

1. Trespasses private family home properties (eapecially SR-706 @ SR-167), potentially more.
2. Does not have a good alignment with the ground based on PEMA imageries, also questionable in some areas.
3. Eventually it connects to Sunbury Line, that means you are encouraging hikers to trespass Norfolk Southern properties. A rail trail should not exist in this form.

A website claims that “The Rail-Trail Council of NEPA is currently working on restoring the trail”. As a result, this is a trail with questionable records. It still exists in Alltrails but hikers have also left reviews that it is just a terrible trail with no maintenance.

You should avoid changing the tags back to a foot path until sorting every above question out first.  Bottom line: You cannot send people to driveways of private properties, that’s misleading.
ncoy1234 (2023-02-08 03:21:18+00:00): That is fair that parts are in rough shape towards the middle of the trail, but it is a legitimate Rail-Trail which a snowmobile club takes care of, although honestly poorly in parts. I was on the trail at the end of the summer and the side toward Montrose was good, and the other end was ok, but the middle got rough for biking. Points 1 and 3 are points that can't be changed, because that's where the rail-road use to be and that's what the trail follows. I will say however that, like you mentioned, it is poorly drawn. A section that's intended to go on the side of the road has people go in at least one person's yard. That seems to only be an issue for a couple of houses though, but it should be fixed, and I can fix it later.
 Also, yes and no that it's removed from AllTrails. The trail is still on AllTrails, although the trail is wrong as it continues past where the trail ends, which might be where some of the bad reviews are from. Alltrails saves the trail with GPS data, so it's still there, but if you go to make a map in the area that of the trail doesn't come as a place you can go because the tags were removed.
DUGA (2023-02-09 01:37:11+00:00): I can do a quick cleanup by the end of tomorrow on the geometry and then see what to be done next.
DaveF (2022-09-02 10:21:24+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9991604554

Miniature/Tourist railways are not public transport. Please don't add erroneous tags just because iD editor suggested it.
Railwayfan2005 (2022-09-02 21:40:14+00:00): What is the correct tag for Common Lane?
DaveF (2022-09-03 00:08:27+00:00): Unsure what you mean.
DaveF (2022-09-05 11:14:09+00:00): No public transport tags are required for entities which aren't public transport.
eggie (2022-08-31 22:07:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Syl (2024-08-27 14:26:15+00:00): Bonjour, plusieurs lieux-dits ont été marqué comme étant des îles alors qu'il n'y a pas d'eau autour. C'est une erreur ?
acubens71 (2024-08-27 17:57:02+00:00): Bonsoir,

Il y avait effectivement un lieu-dit (je n'en n'ai pas vu d'autres, ou alors je ne les ai pas trouvés) improprement taggé en île au lieu d'habitation isolée. J'essaye de faire attention à pas me faire piéger par l'autocomplétion de JOSM, mais ça a coincé ici visiblement!

J'ai corrigé, merci pour la vigilance.
Syl (2024-08-27 20:16:55+00:00): J'ai corrigé les autres dans la Loire, elles n'étaient pas forcément dans ce groupe de modifications.
Vindobona (2022-08-31 21:56:04+00:00): Sorry, wrong!!!!
aTarom (2022-09-01 04:54:32+00:00): Hola, que tenía mal el nombre?
se ha pasado de
"name"="Udabe"
a un raro
"Udabe"="Udabe"
Lo puedes corregir?
Saludos
Frans S (2022-09-04 10:24:28+00:00): Hello. I reviewed your most recent mappings and be glad that you improved your mapping skills.
Be sure you square each building as well with the Q key.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125630560
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 19:00:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9991662415/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
bernardo60 (2025-12-23 07:18:52+00:00): I came across this way on a bike ride which was not on the map and I just rode along it for a few meters. I don't know where it continues.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-21 12:04:32+00:00): will change to fixme=continue?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
silversurfer83 (2022-09-03 07:33:08+00:00): Gude,

bei dem Quad-Center wäre beim Shop der Wert "quad_bike" oder "quad" (singular) angebrachter, da im Englischen üblicherweise nicht von Quads gesprochen wird. Außerdem findet Taginfo noch gar keinen "shop=quads" außer deinem (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=shop%3Dquads)
Wir könnten uns jetzt noch Gedanken machen, wie wir den Verleih und die E-Bikes ordentlich abbilden können.
Abgesehen davon sieht das alles ganz gut aus :)

-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125630897
Carto_Ferret (2022-08-31 22:26:45+00:00): Remodeled roads to the west of M 115 #adt

Source:  Maxar SecureWatch 2022-08-01; Strava
JochenB (2022-09-12 20:58:58+00:00): Hallo Andre, 

ich bin grad noch über folgenden Knoten gestolpert. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9991680417

Bist du dir sicher, dass es in Buchwalde eine Botschaft gibt? Die gibt es eigentlich nur in Hauptstädten!
Ich vermute, du wolltest eigentlich etwas anderes eintragen, oder?

Viele Grüße,
Jochen
JochenB (2022-10-02 21:39:49+00:00): Hallo Andre, 
deine Einträge sind nicht nachvollziehbar. Reihenweise chalets wo es im Netz keine Anzeichen für solche Ferienunterkünfte gibt und hier eine Botschaft mitten in der Lausitz. 

Bitte antworte auf die Kommentare, damit wir klären können, was du wiklich gemeint hast und wir Fehler in OSM vermeiden können.
JochenB (2023-06-18 20:52:03+00:00): Hallo Andre, 
du hast seit 9 Monaten  nicht geantwortet, gleichzeitig finden sich immer neue Chalets. 

Ich befürchte, dass es hier Missverständnisse beim verwenden der Eigenschaften gibt aber die könne wir nur klären, wenn du antwortest,

Viele Grüße,
Jochen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:19:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:06:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 105700417, 105700558, 105700741, 105701669, 105701719, 105701953, 105702087, 105702645, 105702809, 105702944, 105703317, 105703478, 105703570, 105703708, 105704915, 105704961, 105705155, 96938115, 96938218, 96938286, 96938395, 96938627, 96938860, 96938871, 96938877, 96938889, 96938898, 96938922, 96938963, 96938992, 96939013, 96939053, 96939066, 96939091, 96939102, 96939114, 96939137, 96939171, 96939183, 96939192, 96939203, 96939213, 96939223, 96939244, 96939253, 96939300, 96939321, 96939327, 96939339, 96939343, 96939349, 96939366, 96939439, 96939447, 96939451, 96939458, 96939479, 96939490, 96939496, 96939514, 96939543, 96939572, 96939596, 96939655, 96939670, 96939674, 96939687, 96939696, 96939707, 96939713, 96939719, 96939781, 96939792, 96939806, 96939834, 96939864, 96939893, 96939899, 96939908, 96939920, 96939977, 96940056, 96940090, 96940292, 96940336, 96940342, 96940391, 96940527, 96940660, 96942524, 96942568, 96942585, 96942605, 96942613, 96942649, 96942725, 96942769, 96942787, 96942800, 96942806, 96942817, 96942833, 96942852, 96942877, 96943133, 96943156, 96943182, 96943241, 96943292, 96943325, 96943421, 96943449, 96943595, 96943637, 96943801, 96943868, 96943928, 96943947, 96944004, 96944017, 96944053, 96944075, 96944096, 96944279, 96944424, 96944455.
喵耳引力波 (2022-09-01 08:23:48+00:00): I download this changeset and view in JOSM (using Maxar background), maybe those 3 group of building near **San Pedro Sula** still acceptable?

[(15.3971432, -88.0317504),(15.3965147, -87.964662),(15.3330135, -87.9848816)] those 3 group of deleted building.

Maybe those part of deletion deserve cost sometime for a review

Anyway, thank you for your hard DWG work!
SomeoneElse (2022-09-01 08:38:49+00:00): Re the buildings around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892241361 - yes they don't seem to match the imagery that the mapper claimed they used (for completeness - it's a different mapper to the one reverted here).  Initially, I'd suggest commenting on the changeset to explain the problem.  The mapper is still active, and will see your message.

> Anyway, thank you for your hard DWG work!
Thank you for that.  I can't help noticing that that message is somewhat at odds with your user profile https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%E5%96%B5%E8%80%B3%E5%BC%95%E5%8A%9B%E6%B3%A2 and comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123611516 though!
喵耳引力波 (2022-09-01 09:22:32+00:00): 1. About those buildings that I personally think may be worth restoring:

It seems that the original contributor **michaelm30** has stopped contributing for over a year, do you mean you want me to send a verification request to **MarcelGIS**?

I don't know how to upload a temporary osm file, so I'll write here what I think may be a mistake. I used a file service without any login to distribute it: https://wormhole.app/62EY9#5QIlOgt0CptqI7HDWz1zqg  (or I can list way id if needed, but looks too long)
喵耳引力波 (2022-09-01 09:22:54+00:00): 2. About that offensive text

It's a pity that this F word on my profile makes you unhappy, but I didn't mean to target you, but to those DWG members that used "investigate" as an excuse to playing dead. At least long silence on this because of lack of time doesn't make sense. Need they recruit more mapper?

Do you have any suggestions for this issue, Andy?

And for other DWG data maintenance work made by your all, I am very supportive and grateful.

So I think I should truly partially change that profile. (already done)
SomeoneElse (2022-09-01 09:34:22+00:00): Re the buildings, MarcelGIS is still contributing - I'd suggest commenting on a changeset of theirs that added buildings that don't really match the imagery and pointing out the problem (politely).  If communication doesn't occur, emai the DWG
SomeoneElse (2022-09-01 09:45:50+00:00): Re the border dispute, what you seem to be saying is "Country A has invaded part of Country B and occupies it.  The part of Country B that is occupied by Country A should be shown as part of Country A in OSM".
I'd suggest that there's scope for wider discussion of exactly what the current status is here.  Good places to discuss this might be the main talk mailing list or perhaps community.openstreetmap.org/ .  Changeset discussions are great for inter-mapper discussions (like the buildings above), but not where you want the wider community involved, as I suspect you do here.  Changeset comments ending in 307 question marks are unlikely to be taken seriously.
Allison P (2022-08-31 23:08:17+00:00): Please make sure to square buildings by selecting them and pressing Q. Also, names should not be used as descriptions. It is fine (and in some of these cases proper) to not add a name. So things like "Coconut Plantation" and "Fagae'e Residential Area" need to go. Hope this helps.
Allison P (2022-08-31 23:20:14+00:00): Please use better changeset comments. They are required for a reason; to help other mappers know what you are doing. Thank you.
Allison P (2022-08-31 23:22:07+00:00): The green and bunker need to be cut out of the fairway; they should not have any overlap.
Allison P (2022-08-31 23:26:20+00:00): Check spelling of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090871622 "Avenur"
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-04 22:58:40+00:00): ¿Por qué borraste esta ruta? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775996222
Allison P (2022-08-31 23:36:19+00:00): The fairway should be a multipolygon with the green as an inner way. Let me know if you're not sure how to do this. You should just be able to select both ways and press C to merge them.
Graf Westerholt (2023-06-28 19:06:45+00:00): Kannst du bitte mal erklären, warum du fälschlicherweise bei der Hatzfelder Straße „maxspeed“ auf 30 geändert hast?
Allison P (2022-08-31 23:41:06+00:00): Really, over 16,000 changesets and you're not squaring the buildings by selecting them and pressing Q?
savagene (2022-09-05 08:46:43+00:00): Hello, you might want to send him an email from him profile when he will not return it. He seems to be the #1 contributor in Japan, but the location of the new POI's he adds is also wrong, but he won't fix his mistake.

https://osmstats.neis-one.org/?item=countries&country=Japan
Allison P (2022-08-31 23:42:50+00:00): Hello, fellow Allison! Please square buildings after drawing them by selecting them and pressing Q. Thanks!
Allison P (2022-08-31 23:56:37+00:00): All you've done is add two useless nodes to the building. What was your intent?
LockOnGuy (2022-09-01 00:09:02+00:00): Hello again, why did you delete n8942835917? now no one can find the resort when they search for it...
Allison P (2022-09-01 00:02:33+00:00): access=no is more for things like military installations. You want access=private. Also, road names should be fully expanded (Lane instead of Ln). Hope this helps.
Allison P (2022-09-01 00:06:36+00:00): Names should not be used as descriptions. Instead of name=Hole 1, do ref=1. Fairways and such don't need any description at all. For tee boxes, do tee=gold or tee=blue or what have you. Hope this helps.
Quest84 (2022-09-01 02:04:03+00:00): Thank you!
Allison P (2022-09-01 00:08:38+00:00): Ironically, you've spelled it wrong. node instead of note.

Maybe capacity=3 would work?
spelledwrongdotuk (2022-09-01 00:19:51+00:00): Fixed. Honestly, from the satellite imagery and comments on the changeset this was added in, I don't think this exists, but I haven't been there so fixing the name is the most I'm going to do.
user_5359 (2022-09-03 06:10:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1090876219. what is the meaning of the tag NOH=yes? Did you mean nohousenumber= yes? (There are also four objects with key noh)
SomeoneElse (2022-09-01 07:44:53+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain why you deleted the named residential landuse https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288620254/history here?
user_14063915 (2022-09-01 01:31:25+00:00): Was hier gebaut wird und Details zu den Wegen, wurden von mir vor Ort erfasst.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-01 02:09:38+00:00): Why are you keep deleting the name:ar for this node?       
 https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/2488229258        
The correct name is "باش تبة	" please restore it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125633462
LockOnGuy (2022-09-01 02:09:56+00:00): Why are you keep deleting the name:ar for this node?       
 https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/2488229258        
The correct name is "باش تبة	" please restore it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125633462