piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-08-01 17:29:30+00:00): herstel je edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72907630
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
eggie (2019-08-01 17:31:31+00:00): access=no moet er echt af.
Evt vehicle=no
Is de naam echt name=Dijk  of is het een dijk?
Dan name=Dijk verwijderen
Eggie
Lejun (2021-10-31 14:58:41+00:00): Hi, was mapping the railway station and found out a bunch of non-tagged ways linking parallels’ tramway tunnels. Could you elaborate on that? Is it an issue or something I’m not aware of? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709702639
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-02-18 03:52:03+00:00): este usuário duplicou várias coisas que ja existiam... aff
eggie (2019-08-01 17:33:29+00:00): name=Pad langs Vecht Dat zal toch niet?  Graag verwijderen. Het gebied van je edit is zo groot geworden omdat je het pad aan de landuse hebt geplakt en ook aan de Vecht zelf. Intekenen en dan de linker alttoets gebruiken voorkomt plakken.
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-01 18:02:44+00:00): pad losgemaakt van landuse name name pad langs vecht verwijderd
SomeoneElse (2020-10-17 12:06:34+00:00): Hello,
It looks like you've got https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697678493 too far to the north - the mown grass strip is clearly visible in the Bing imagery to the south of it.
Jan Olieslagers (2020-10-17 12:12:42+00:00): You must have Bing imagery other than what I see, then. I checked again and it looks exactly right. Can screen copy if you really won't believe me.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-17 12:21:56+00:00): I'm looking at the latest Bing imagery, that goes up to z20.
Jan Olieslagers (2020-10-17 12:26:16+00:00): ?? Incomprehensible. It feels more and more like you are on a personal witch-hunt.
Just in case you are not an aviator: there is nothing unusual in shifting grass runways a couple of yards either way, to allow the grass to recover.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-17 12:34:51+00:00): Nothing personal - I'm just going down the list at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=ukairfieldguide#values .  We know that that site is dependent on Google and can't be used as a source for OSM, but many of the places where it has been used as a source are visible on other imagery that can be used (and this example is one of those).
Jan Olieslagers (2020-10-17 12:39:26+00:00): Of course you are totally free to remap the runway at a location you consider more correct - I promise I'll be less pecky than you.
Then again, the site is indeed heavily dependent on one single source, and one of poor reputation - I did tell the owner/maintainer. And surely we cannot and won't directly copy from there, for reasons of copyright; still, they are not liars. Aren't you taking the OSM guidelines beyond their intended meaning?
SomeoneElse (2020-10-17 12:44:39+00:00): > Aren't you taking the OSM guidelines beyond their intended meaning?
No - that's why I always check with the original mapper rather than just reverting/redacting data in OSM that claims to use an incompatible source.  Quite often people, especially new mappers, have local knowledge of somewhere but when asked for a source think they have to pick something "official" and think "well, it's also visible on Google".
pitscheplatsch (2019-08-02 08:11:35+00:00): Hi LittleMapAssistant, welcome to OSM.

Again, could you please give us some more details what you're doing here? Thanks.

Micro-Way-Mapping with more than 20 nodes? See 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709627917

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
eggie (2019-08-01 17:34:41+00:00): Prima... name=Dijk  is dat de straatnaam..? anders weghalen. evt vehicle=no als je er niet mag fietsen.
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-01 17:36:22+00:00): vehicle=no taggen en de rest van de accesstags verwijderen
permissive wil zeggen dat de eigenaar van de grond je ten alle tijde je de toegang kan ontzeggen. Niets meer dan dat.
eggie (2019-08-01 17:37:25+00:00): oke.. beter vehicle=no Er zijn meer tweewielers dan alleen fietsen.
NGL-engel (2020-02-14 20:03:57+00:00): Hallo Mike Eikel, 
   ich habe gesehen das Du eine Ampel auf der "Steinfelder Straße" (in der Nähe der "Im Sonnenwinkel") eingezeichnet hast. Ist das eine Fußgängerampel? Auf den Luftbildern erschließt sich mir deren Zweck nicht wirklich.
Gruß Angela
Mike Eikel (2020-02-21 21:56:50+00:00): Hallo Angela,
du hast recht die Ampel die ich gemeint habe ist eine Fußgängerampel, jedoch habe ich die an der falschen Straße angesetzt gehabt. Die Fußgängerampel die ich meinte war die beim Steinbrick. Danke für den Hinweis.
LG Mike
eggie (2019-08-01 17:38:32+00:00): vehicle=no  motor_vehicle zal niet routeren hier, maar de tag kan geen kwaad.
Branko Kokanovic (2019-08-27 20:47:16+00:00): da li je za railway=platform trebalo dodavati tram=yes mozda? jel to lako dodati naknadno, ne treba "on the ground znanje", mozda mogu ja da prodjem, znam gde su nam tramvaji:)
Aleksa M (2019-08-27 20:58:31+00:00): Treba svakako, nego, eto, ja sam to zaboravio da stavim. Treba, da bi se znalo šta staje tu, jer se isti tag koristi i za vozove. Samo ih odabereš sve odjednom i staviš tram=yes, da ne bi to ponavljao za svaku ponaosob. Ne treba nikakvo znanje, znamo da su to tramvajske platforme. Apsolutno svakoj treba dodati taj tag.
Branko Kokanovic (2019-08-28 12:23:01+00:00): Samo da dodam:
1. Zali mi se iD editor da treba da dodamo i `public_transport=platform`
2. Ove platforme nisu nikako povezane sa ostatkom mape. Da li mislis da treba da ih povezujemo?
Aleksa M (2019-08-28 12:40:24+00:00): Treba da se doda taj tag, ali bolje da si koristio JOSM editor, brže bi uradio posao. Što se tiče povezivanja, ne znam. Ja sam neke povezao koje su već bile blizu stepenica ili su tu već bili highway=footway, pa sam zamenio samo tag. Ali zašto kažem da ne znam, ne znam da li pešačka navigacija može da ih koristi, jer druge svrhe baš i nema, osim da se vidi da stanica nije na trotoaru, nego da ima posebna platforma. Ako može da ih koristi, onda ne bi bilo loše da se povežu sa pešačkim prelazima, npr.
Aleksa M (2019-08-28 12:44:57+00:00): Testirao sam ovde https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709706627 i izgleda da mogu da se koriste u pešačkoj navigaciji.
Branko Kokanovic (2019-08-28 13:15:24+00:00): naravno da cu da koristim josm + overpass da uvezem entitete, nisam lud:) nego sam video kad sam probavao u iD-u da baca ovaj warning, pa da pitam. no worries:)
Branko Kokanovic (2019-08-28 19:10:10+00:00): Dodao u https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73854661
Aleksa M (2019-08-28 19:34:40+00:00): Odlično!
eggie (2019-08-01 17:40:32+00:00): "Pad door Park" als naam hoort niet op de kaart. Elk begin is lastig. Dat plakken is een vervelende eigenschap van deze editor. Er zijn betere editors. Linker alt toets gebruiken tijdens intekenen en goed inzoomen.
Gr Eggie
user_5359 (2019-08-01 20:37:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
ivanbranco (2022-11-05 11:53:39+00:00): Hi FrShaft,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3471717502

there some extra text here in the meorial=* value, could you take a look at it?
Zabir91 (2019-08-05 20:28:56+00:00): Hi, thank you for contributing.
In this changeset, you have deleted a building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506407247
and created a new https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709710660 
If you want to correct something, try to keep the older object. That shows respect to older mappers.
suppose in this case, you could just simply resize the building.
Asif_Iqbal (2019-08-07 06:35:00+00:00): Sorry sir, I'm a new mapper, I will follow your advice, and i respect your opinion too.
Zabir91 (2019-08-11 04:50:08+00:00): Keep mapping , I'm just a mapper like you :)
eggie (2019-08-01 18:05:28+00:00): Oke.. succes.. Ik kijk later nog wel. Rustig aan. 
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2019-08-01 20:05:58+00:00): Ben zeer benieuwd naar de bron voor deze wijziging.
Het geplaatste verkeersbord C20 geeft toch echt aan dat de max aslast 10 ton is.
Of heeft de wegbeheerder het verkeerde bord geplaatst ?
defluyter (2019-08-01 21:14:44+00:00): Hoi Leo, excuus, je hebt gelijk, ik heb verkeerd gekeken. Heb het weer ongedaan gemaakt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72915339). Is er een algemene policy over het bijsluiten van bronnen? Kan mij bijv. voorstellen dat in sommige gevallen een mapper een foto wil bijvoegen indien actuele situatie meer up to date is dan streetview beelden.
Leo Slager (2019-08-01 22:05:10+00:00): Dag defluyter,
Ik zou het eens op moeten zoeken, maar voor zover ik weet is dat niet beschreven.
De editors geven wel de mogelijkheid om een bron te noemen. Soms is dat heel makkelijk:
survey of local knowledge
Een enkele keer zie ik een link naar een verkeersbesluit van de gemeente.
En in de afgelopen jaren heb ik twee mappers gezien die alles voorzagen van een link naar een foto.  Zie bijvoorbeeld:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1854728#map=17/51.81539/3.90490&layers=N
defluyter (2019-08-02 07:53:32+00:00): Super, dank!
woodpeck (2019-08-02 07:32:07+00:00): Dear rivermont, please refrain from making mechanical corrections/edits like you did here unless you have discussed them with the community first, explaining what algorithm/rule you intend to apply exactly. Edits like this run the danger of putting your "last edited" mark on objects that might be outright wrong, or are in need for other quality-improving edits. For example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6177765656 claims to be in a street that does not exist in OSM, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6060251992 could have benefited from someone tracing the actual building the business is in, etc.; actually most of the POIs you have identified seem to stem from one and the same service provider adding businesses to OSM which could well deserve a closer look. By fixing "Payments" attention to other details, you're making these often problematic edits go unnoticed. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/What%27s_the_problem_with_mechanical_edits%3F for an in-depth explanation.
rivermont (2019-08-02 19:39:45+00:00): Thanks Frederick for the explanation. I'll go over all aspects of the POIs when I edit in the future.
viloan (2019-08-01 18:03:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
trigpoint (2019-08-01 22:27:35+00:00): Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.
The extent of the public highway was already correctly mapped.
This area was mapped by a survey, however  Bing imagery clearly shows the kerb demarking the public highway/highway=residential.
Beyond that is a private shared driveway which should be tagged as highway=service/service=driveway.
Cheers Phil
galyanh (2019-08-02 13:37:13+00:00): Hi Phil,

Thanks for looking into this edit. We have modified according to your suggestions. Let me know in case you have any further suggestion. Always happy to learn from the local community.

Regards
galyanh
chnav (2019-10-14 06:16:47+00:00): Здравствуйте, в ОСМ запрещено переносить любые данные с карт Яндекса и Гугла. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5257

Извините, правка откачена полностью во избежание возможных юридических последствий для ОСМ и потребителей его карт.
DressyPear4 (2019-08-19 19:52:01+00:00): Revertido
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
dmlu (2019-08-01 20:43:14+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

As this is your first changeset in Luxembourg, I briefly looked over it. It seems that this hotel tagged, and that maps.me doesn't support the deletion of places, correct? Changing the name to "closed" doesn't help a lot, what would be better is to either use another editor and remove it yourself, or opening a note and write something like "hotel closed".

I removed the hotel from the map :)

Thank you for your contribution, and welcome to OpenStreetMap :)
Alouette955 (2019-08-11 18:18:39+00:00): Des arrêts de bus (public_transport=platform) ont été ajoutés près de la station Côte-Vertu. Pour détecter les mises à jour futures des lignes de bus il serait bon que le numéro de l'arrêt soit ajouté (ref=xxx) afin de les comparer avec le fichiers gtfs de exo.quebec (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:STL_-_Soci%C3%A9t%C3%A9_de_transport_de_Laval).

J'ai aussi corrigé l'ordre des arrêts qui doivent apparaître dans l'ordre et avant les chemins dans les relations de type ligne de bus.
mosstreet (2019-08-01 19:04:47+00:00): This is not an embassy territory
eggie (2019-08-01 20:14:58+00:00): Dag Luuc Ik had je al eerder een welkomstmail gestuurd met feedback. Dit is niet de bedoeling zo. Verdiep je eerst in de materie voordat je start. Gebouwen en adressen zijn import van het Kadaster. Daar liever niet aankomen en zeker niet veranderen. 
Je edits zullen worden teruggedraaid.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-08-01 20:16:43+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #72913853
eggie (2019-08-01 20:33:32+00:00): Prima gelukt zo.
Gr eggie
joost schouppe (2020-03-03 11:23:14+00:00): Hi Zesty,
I don't think this road is a bridge?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48924368#map=17/50.14543/3.69078
mavl (2019-11-16 18:00:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
Constable (2019-10-06 06:29:03+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto su osm!
occhio perché le modifiche che stai facendo non sono compatibili con le regole del progetto e qualcuno ha aperto una nota per farlo presente https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1950170
Gli edifici sono quasi sempre con una pianta ad angoli retti, questi da te disegnati invece risultano completamente sproprorzionati, inoltre hanno dei nomi (abitazione) che non sono in realtà dei nomi, ma piuttosto delle descrizioni.
In OSM per indicare il tipo/natura di oggetto bisogna scegliere l'etichetta adatta da assegnare ad ogni oggetto. building=house indica una casa, se poi l'oggetto in questione ha un nome proprio è giusto dargli un nome, in caso contrario no, come vedrai nel 99% dei casi gli edifici abitativi non hanno nome sulla mappa.
Prima di continuare con le modifiche alla mappa ti pregherei di dare una lettura a
https://learnosm.org/it/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Features

Grazie!
GinaroZ (2019-08-01 21:13:38+00:00): Hi, can I ask why you've removed addr:city and brand:wikipedia from some objects like this one? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1710487673
atomwaffen (2019-08-02 02:49:46+00:00): How can I partly undo my changeset? I didn't want to remove any "addr:city"!
atomwaffen (2019-08-02 03:09:31+00:00): The addresses are back now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72920567
GinaroZ (2019-08-02 14:42:18+00:00): Sorry, not sure how to partially revert changes, but thanks for sorting them.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-21 00:52:28+00:00): observed while investigating
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
 
mechanical removal of brand:wikipedia
iWowik (2019-11-23 19:18:20+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, Goncharova_Anna!
Вы ставите номера домов, а их обычно не просто найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы их берете?
xtd (2019-08-04 18:27:17+00:00): Por favor, note que a grande parte das vias de Chapecó precisa possuir o sufixo "- E" ou "- D" por força de esdrúxula lei municipal de numeração.
xtd (2019-08-04 18:29:26+00:00): Ao retirar essa característica, quebra-se o sistema de endereçamento que não está preparado para ter o sufixo no numeral em si. Note que os Correios também fazem a distinção na nomeação da via quando ela cruza um dos eixos determinados pela lei municipal. Por favor, retorne a nomeação ao que era, algo que já deu muito trabalho para estabelecer.
kartonage (2019-08-02 03:00:40+00:00): Hej Mallory Duke,

amenity=embassy has been deprecated and superseeded by diplomatic=* tagging. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=embassy

You shouldn't change it back to the deprecated value while also removing the new tags.

Best regards
Svalbard (2019-08-02 12:24:12+00:00): Hallo ABausD,
Du hast zwar mit den Lift_gates an den jeweiligen Brückenenden recht, aber diese sind ja nur geschlossen, wenn ein Schiff die Brücke passiert.
Sollte man das nicht entsprechend kennzeichnen? Eine konkrete Idee dafür habe ich allerdings im Moment auch nicht. Gruß Svalbard

P.S. 
Gerade beim WOA?
ABausD (2019-08-03 11:25:03+00:00): Du hast recht, man sollte das entsprechend kennzeichnen. Ich hatte kein besseres Tagging gefunden.
Bahnübergang ist ähnlich, passt aber nicht: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway%3Dlevel_crossing

Vielleicht schaut man sich an wie andere Klappbrücken getaggt sind. Ich müsste erst welche suchen.

War nur an den Anreisetagen beim W:O:A.
Bist du lokaler Mapper?
Wulfmorn (2019-08-08 19:55:14+00:00): It seems you changed Mjøsa from natural=water to natural=lake. This is incorrect and it caused the lake to no longer render. The tagging should be "natural=water" AND "water=lake".
FredrikLindseth (2019-08-08 20:31:36+00:00): ☝️
vorpalblade (2019-08-02 21:58:22+00:00): Since you have requested a review, here we go:
1) The building should have been squared (keyboard shortcut "q" in iD, which is what you are using, the other method is to right-click on the building and select "Square").
2) You should have continued the "Lang Drive" road instead of creating a new road with no information.

If you want to square the building yourself and add the road information, let me know. Otherwise, I'll (try) to remember to do it in a few days myself.

Just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018". You may also want to take a look at "Mapbox Satellite".

Thank you for contributing, and I hope to see more edits from you in the future,
vorpalblade
eggie (2019-08-01 20:25:59+00:00): Dag Tom.. In OSM niet zelf adressen aanmaken. maak gebruik van de reeds aanwezige BAG adfesnodes (kadaster)
MVG,
Eggie
Tom Freijsen (2019-08-01 20:35:18+00:00): Beste Eggie,
Bedankt voor je feedback, ik heb hem in changeset 72914306 verwijderd en in plaats daarvan de BAG-adresnode gewijzigd.
eggie (2019-08-01 20:43:04+00:00): Helemaal perfect nu!
Gr eggie
user_5359 (2019-08-02 04:54:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information (like 'Home') from residential or owner to a residential building!
aceman444 (2019-10-26 13:15:54+00:00): Hi, please do not add embassies that already exist and are mapped more precisely than what you added. Also please do not make up their names.
Adding the missing tags (like 'target') is useful of course.
Thanks.
aceman444 (2019-10-26 19:50:24+00:00): OK, I see you took the name from the usembassy.gov site. So I copied that as name:en to the already mapped embassy object. Thanks.
seattlefyi (2019-08-02 05:54:52+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the benches and drinking fountains (both great things to add). If you have any questions please ask. Thanks again and hope to see more edits!
Sam Wilson (2019-08-05 04:38:44+00:00): Thanks for helping to improve the map, but this office that you've added to Fremantle doesn't actually exist. What did you mean to add?

I'll remove this for you.
kasmar00 (2019-08-03 12:31:57+00:00): Hej, zrobiłeś ponownie to co wycofałem, zajrzyj proszę na forum w przeciwnym razie wycofam znowu. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=756912#p756912
Ta droga rowerowa nie jest jeszcze otwarta, dodatkowo jej geometria (oraz geometria innych rzeczy które edytowałeś jak np. parkingi) nie wynikają z ortofotmapy geoportalu.
Duja (2019-08-02 14:37:23+00:00): De molim te, nadmorsku visinu stavljaj u ele= tag, ne u name.
mmns (2019-08-02 16:03:52+00:00): ok
mmns (2019-08-02 16:16:58+00:00): Mislim da sam sve nadm. visine koje sam dodao prebacio u ele tag na FG. Hvala.
AgusQui (2019-09-02 04:44:25+00:00): Por favor sea más riguroso, para evitar agregar errores, el edificio que agregó en el Parque de la Memoria es en realidad una plaza seca, y mucho menos es un museo, como tampoco es un museo el edifico de entrada. Agregue cosas si realmente conoce el lugar, no se guie por la imágenes satelitales.
trial (2025-10-17 08:31:55+00:00): According to https://www.hidro.gov.ar/oceanografia/AlturasHorarias.asp, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709793077 is a tide gauge (Mareógrafo Buenos Aires)
viloan (2019-08-01 21:03:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_2954791 (2019-09-01 11:22:07+00:00): Warum ist die Zschorgulaer Straße nicht mehr durchgängig?
gscscnd (2019-08-02 16:04:48+00:00): Typ unclassified tutaj nie pasuje, powinien być track (poprawione w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72947804). Jaką nawierzchnię ma obecnie most?
szprota (2019-08-02 16:20:50+00:00): Cały most z drewna, również nawierzchnia.
gscscnd (2019-08-02 16:25:44+00:00): Dzięki, dodałem informację w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72948627.