piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
blackboxlogic (2021-01-19 03:00:52+00:00): @WeChat, Welcome to OSM! I don't think any part of this is automated, so maybe the "import guidelines" would be a more appropriate concern. You can find the documentation here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Maine_Admin_Boundary_Import
We'd appreciate any feedback you have about the process or the quality of the changes.
Pepilepioux (2021-02-09 09:59:23+00:00): Bonjour,
POURQUOI avez-vous supprimé tous ces chemins ?
Je fais un revert.
zuicz (2021-01-19 08:41:57+00:00): Nie wiem czy ty to zmieniałeś czy ktoś inny ale 653 (na szczęście) nie jeździ przez Rzepakową ;)
dzamper (2021-01-19 18:14:36+00:00): Ja tylko poprzestawiałem kolejność dróg które już były dodane do relacji ;) To nie do końca moje rejony ale zakładam że po wybudowaniu Centrum Przesiadkowego trochę linii tak czy siak zmieniło trasy i trzeba będzie wszystkie skontrolować
dgitto (2022-05-08 05:06:23+00:00): non ci sono scuole in questo edificio scolastico?
grifo2 (2022-05-08 13:22:04+00:00): Si, in questo edificio ce la scuola primaria e la scuola dell'infanzia.
vasony (2021-01-20 22:29:05+00:00): This part is not Villányi út! I change it back.
AndyB_66 (2021-01-19 09:23:19+00:00): Dziękuję za poprawki i przepraszam za błędy. Możesz podpowiedzieć, co było nie tak, żebym w przyszłości mógł unikać tego typu baboli?
B_KSL (2021-01-19 15:19:58+00:00): Dokładnie jak w opisie zestawu zmian. Jeden punkt na drugim zamiast wspólnego węzła. To uroki edytora iD. Nie mam pojęcia od czego to zależy, że raz łączy takie punkty poprawnie a innym razem stawia dwa. Zachęcam do JOSM.
AndyB_66 (2021-01-19 19:58:26+00:00): OK, rozumiem. Z JOSM-em dopiero "raczkuję" - jak znajdę wolną chwilę to obejrzę sobie webinar od 
OpenStreetMap Polska spróbuję go intensywniej używać.
eteb3 (2021-07-30 17:09:53+00:00): Hi

I don't know this site at all first hand, but wondering if you do know first hand whether what you have tagged as cliffs are natural or man-made? 

Especially at the southern side, the line seems to be razor-sharp and so I wonder if it's artificial; especially as it seems to be exactly perpendicular to the azimuth of the summer (December) solstice at 114deg?

It's a fascinating site - I've just learned about it bc it's been UNESCO listed. If you have more details great.
c tito young (2021-07-31 02:19:43+00:00): Hi.   Thanks for asking.  While really impossible to be sure, I believe those cliffs are manmade and then leaving it to nature to pummel them to look natural.  Its too much of a coincidence that the angles to so precise.  

Notice something even more interesting that that.   Look at the structures to its 0400... look who they are lined up?   Now.. draw a line from the center of that complex to the centers of those other buildings and presto, you get a huge angle that I see over and over in Nazca.   I hope you know what I mean.    

I am pretty sure UNESCO is on to the geometry.
InsertUser (2021-01-20 03:46:58+00:00): 1993 is not old enough for the copyright to have expired. This would not be an acceptable source unless you have permission from the authors.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
PolGeoNow (2021-01-20 03:50:26+00:00): Oh, I didn't trace anything from the map though. I was just referencing it for place names.
InsertUser (2021-01-21 01:37:10+00:00): I think that probably still counts as copying as some of the well known copyright "traps" on maps include fictitious settlements and place names.
PolGeoNow (2021-01-21 02:24:41+00:00): I understand your concern, but facts can't be copyrighted, only original representations of them, such as styles or arrangements created by the uthor: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/6/6f/Protection_of_Collaborative_Online_Maps_under_US_Copyright_Law.pdf

Referencing a map for place names can no more be copyright infringement than writing a book that cites facts learned from other books.

Even trap streets have been rejected as copyrighteable by US courts: https://www.leagle.com/decision/19921525796fsupp72911403

I understand that these issues aren't well clarified in the OSM guidelines, so I don't hold whatever position you settle on against you, but I do hope that a correct and reasonable understanding of actual copyright law can prevail in the OSM project.
InsertUser (2021-01-24 02:17:13+00:00): The issues are well clarified in OSM guidelines where it says "Do not use data from copyrighted maps or any other proprietary data!" in bold text on the copyright page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
Polarbear-repair (2021-02-04 11:45:00+00:00): Dear PolGeoNow, 
OSM is an international project and has to be extra careful when it comes to copyright issues. What might be legal in one country might be problematic in another. 
Please stick to the OSM guidelines. 
Tom
Data Working Group, 
ticket 2021012110000025
PolGeoNow (2021-02-04 16:23:21+00:00): Dear Tom,
Okay, thanks for the clarification on that. I think the guidelines could be a lot clearer. They specifically mention tracing and "copying" (a vague term that I wouldn't have thought applied in this case), but if you don't even want people to reference copyrighted maps to find out what a place is called, I think it would be helpful to explicitly say so. By many people's logic (including my own), this is no different from referencing a fact from a book when writing an article.
Best,
Evan
MikeN (2021-01-19 00:05:50+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments - 'No one cares' does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
skquinn (2021-01-19 12:05:25+00:00): Actually, yes, people do care, and you are not helping them by writing blatant rubbish for changeset comments. Also, this is way too big of an area for one changeset (9 US states as well as a huge chunk of Mexico and Cuba).
rene78 (2021-01-19 00:25:58+00:00): Hi banban_msm,

you need to name the relation, not the member.

Cheers
Rene
eggie (2021-01-19 06:06:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Feedback.. Wanneer een bedrijf verdwijnt zal het adres gewoon blijven bestaan. Helaas heb je dat nu verwijderd.
Nieuwe adressen niet aanmaken in OSM. Die zijn al aanwezig. 
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-19 06:31:16+00:00): Adres hersteld en shop=bierwinkel aangepast naar =alcohol
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-27 22:02:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2823232 i inne podają że zaimportowano tu niestniejące budynki
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-27 22:03:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2822902#map=18/54.38449/19.44794&layers=N - i inne pobliskie można by też przejrzeć (ja teraz spać idę :) )
G_P_J (2021-08-29 12:09:53+00:00): Teren trudny do weryfikacji. Usunąłem "moje" budynki, których nie widać na podkładzie i nie występują na warstwie ewidencji budynków: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110410025
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-29 13:14:10+00:00): Dzięki wielkie!
Whoint (2021-01-19 16:38:17+00:00): Dear kbruen,

a Wikidata ID should only be used by a SINGLE OSM element, so only https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11034312 should get wikidata=Q1412251 and not every way in this relation.

Best wishes,
Whoint
kbruen (2021-01-19 17:05:06+00:00): Hello,

I wanted to add the ref of the ways. I looked at some ways of the line 200 (near Codlea) and noticed that those had the Wikidata ID which automatically also added the ref, hence why I also tagged these by example.

I am aware of an upcoming effort to remake the relations of the Romanian Railways as the current ones are inconsistent. I will correct this as part of that.
ralley (2021-01-19 18:57:44+00:00): Why have you removed the building tags from these?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97726494
JenTreg (2021-01-19 19:28:43+00:00): Sorry, when I selected climbing gym I didn't realise it removed the building tag! Have rectified it now :)
Marek-M (2021-01-27 11:38:31+00:00): Cześć, Twoja pierwsza edycja jest bardzo nieudana. Zmieniłeś kategorie głównych dróg w Warszawie i raczej zrobiłeś to nieświadomie. Twoja zmiana zostanie wycofana.
RicoElectrico (2021-01-19 01:52:23+00:00): Cześć, tak szybko dodajesz budynki, że mam wątpliwości czy je przeglądasz. Proszę o zwolnienie i przejrzenie tego, co dodajesz  Pomocna może być wtyczka todo. OSM to nie wyścig ;)
RicoElectrico (2021-01-19 01:54:12+00:00): Tj. np w jednej z edycji 400 budynków w 2 minuty. To nawet nie jest 1 sekunda na przejrzenie. Ja bym przeznaczył co najmniej 20-30 min na sprawdzenie tak dużej liczby. A niektóre zestawy zmian mają i po 2000 budynków.
ivanbranco (2021-01-19 12:50:01+00:00): Hi kmzpg,

お地蔵様=* is not a valid tag, can you fix it?
Map-Peter (2021-01-19 23:12:41+00:00): Hallo Xre90, 
 
ich war mal so frei das direkt anzupassen ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97795965 ). 
 
Gruß Peter
Niklaus Weiss (2021-01-30 13:28:49+00:00): Veliki dio vasih promjena su vandalski. Molim vas da ih ne ponavljate.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-18 17:36:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106601431 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some suspected vandalism in Bosnia.
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-19 06:25:02+00:00): Hi Kanto55, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Kanto55 (2021-01-19 12:33:12+00:00): Added buildings and adjusted mapping of areas I am familiar with. I am a new mapper.
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-19 12:37:59+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
#HappyMapping
ivanbranco (2021-01-23 09:43:27+00:00): Hi kmzpg,

石碑=* is not a valid tag, can you fix it?
I don't know the language but maybe memorial=stele is what are you looking for?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:26:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Tony Cee (2021-01-24 13:49:17+00:00): Note, the "2020-2021 Trail Map" is the Mount Van Hoevenberg 2020-2021 Trail Map" published by ORDA, a NY State agency.  It does not contain any copy right notices and it it believed to be in the public domain.  The map was referred to to find the location of the number posts, it was not traces or copied.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:30:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
eggie (2021-01-19 06:15:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Feedback:  Weet je zeker dat de node met B&B met de naam 'Nederland' hier op de juiste plaats staat.
Is dit wel een serieuze bijdrage ?
Je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=97729553
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-19 06:44:39+00:00): Dit was een placenode voor Nederland.
Niet iets om een guesthouse van te maken. 
Wat was je bedoeling?

Ik draai e.e.a. terug.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-19 06:47:11+00:00): reverted by changeset #97742686
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
maning (2021-02-26 04:02:21+00:00): These roads are driveways going to the underground parking.  Please double check how you classified roads before fixing them.
MonteGeneroso (2021-02-27 02:11:23+00:00): Hi maning, Thank you for catching this and reaching out. I now see the Mapillary images here that show the multiple parking entrances, and I agree that highway=service would be best here. Regarding the use of driveway, the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway) says to not use service=driveway in or around a parking lot, and to use highway=service without service=* on the entrance and exit ways. Because of this, I think it’d be best to not use driveway tags here and instead use amenity=parking_entrance nodes for these parking entrances and exits. 

However, is there a local convention about the service=driveway issue on the Philippines wiki that is different from the global OSM policy? I see on the mapping conventions page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions/Roads) it just says to use highway=service for "Private driveways, parking area roads, alleys, minor irrigation roads, and other access roads, usually unnamed."

Otherwise, if you agree, I would be happy to update this area to include the additional parking entrances and exits.

Thanks again for bringing this to my attention and for uploading the Mapillary here!
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-19 06:23:57+00:00): Hi Ironman72, welcome to OSM.

Why did you delete your mapped golf course? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
eggie (2021-01-19 06:24:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review.. Beperk je in het begin met allerlei toevoegingen. Veel straat er al op en iets dubbel toevoegen heeft weinig zin.
Svp ook niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat kan schade geven. 
De info op het spoor komt van Proraill en zijn edits van een ervaren raillmapper. Daar svp niets aan veranderen.
operator hoort op de routerelatie en niet op een platform. 
De moskee is nu 2x getagd net als de school. 
Graag voorzichtig mappen en niet zomaar edits van andere mappers  veranderen. 
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community


Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=97730298
eggie (2021-01-19 06:36:34+00:00): tagging railway hersteld