piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silence2001 (2020-05-09 10:06:59+00:00): Es handelt sich hierbei um den offiziellen Umleitungsweg für die derzeit als Einbahnstraße Richtung Osten ausgewiesene Steinstraße
silence2001 (2020-05-09 10:09:21+00:00): Wenn Du mir wirklich helfen willst, dann sag mir doch einfach, was ich tun kann, damit sich die Realität (Busse befahren diese Straße) in den Kartendaten wiederspiegelt. Das ist viel hilfreicher als alles was ich ändere einfach wieder zurückzunehmen.
ma-rt-in (2020-05-09 12:43:56+00:00): Hallo,
mit bus=yes können Wege markiert werden, welche für den Busverkehr freigegeben sind. bus=yes steht nie allein sondern immer mit vehicle=* o. motor_vehicle=*. Schau auch dazu mal hier: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/ und hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland

vg
jambamkin (2020-09-07 17:16:36+00:00): Hello Rahul, Thank you for your contribution to the map. On node/7493704762 the museum 'bernoli' you have added both diaper=yes and changing_table=no, these cannot both be present. Can you read over https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:changing%20table and correct the tags on the node. Thanks James
user_11166885 (2020-05-13 12:47:51+00:00): Mi scusi, ma la tratta di Via del Sommacco tra il civico 13 e Via Jacopone da Todi dovrebbe avere l'accesso consentito per tutti liberamente, tranne per i veicoli che hanno la servitù di passaggio.
user_11166885 (2020-05-18 10:10:59+00:00): La way 801249664 è di una classificazione inesistente in italia.
user_6631989 (2020-07-08 14:17:40+00:00): Mi scusi ma la Se ce la fanno o no è un problema loro way 801249664 è stata rimopsa
user_11166885 (2020-07-08 14:50:20+00:00): Mi scusi, non ho capito?
hsc666 (2020-05-10 09:05:13+00:00): Hallo tommwi, Du hast die Anzahl der oberirdischen Stockwerke des Gebäudes mit "0" angegeben. D.h. das Gebäude ist zweidimensional und so flach, wie eine Briefmarke?
VG
hsc666
BeKri (2020-05-09 09:33:04+00:00): Danke für das zurückändern der Schreibweise von
Adolf-von-Menzel-Straße
aber warum hast Du das 
highway=residential gelöscht ?
Strasse ohne Eingeschaften ?
Warum hast Du bei
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26410798
die Schreibweise stehen lassen ?
Ich hab es geändert, BITTE in Zukunft a bisserl mehr Sorgfalt und Umsicht, Danke ! Gruss derBeKri
L'imaginaire (2020-05-11 17:39:34+00:00): If you delete the separate cyclelanes and you do not change the tags on the main road, than the data is worse than before. Generally speaking, deleting information that is correct is not the way to go.
Jakka (2020-05-08 07:16:00+00:00): Beste je moet eens in detail edit mode die bomen gaan bekijken, dit zijn waarschijnlijk gerigistreerde exemplaren voor een of ander onderzoek .... om op te volgen....
natural=tree
ref=2008.0039A
species=Halesia diptera var. magniflora
start_date=2008
Diógenes de Sinope (2020-05-07 16:30:53+00:00): "based on professional knowledge"

you hardly did anything, all you did was add a node along a way
user_5359 (2020-05-07 18:33:04+00:00): Hello! You use sometimes the misspelled key buiding instead building. If you correct this please delete the misspelled key also. To find this key please use https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Tto
Zsolt Medgyesi (2020-05-12 00:21:13+00:00): Hello,
you marked a service road as smoothness=very_horrible, which means  it can be crossed only via trial bikes, tanks or specialized offroad vehicles (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness).
I understand the general condition of the roads in Hungary could be better, but the situation in this case is not that bad :)
I modified it to smoothness=intermediate in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85050580), since I have information, that trucks actively crossing there.
Zsolt Medgyesi (2020-05-12 00:46:00+00:00): And there was some hgv access mistake, I fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85051083
azsr (2020-05-07 21:24:44+00:00): Hi. Instead of doing that wonky thing to get the inner rough/bunker area, you can use multipolygons: https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#drawing-multipolygons This allows you to draw the outer boundary, the inner boundary, and then combine them by pressing 'c'.

Best,
azsr
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84836070
user_5359 (2020-05-07 18:33:10+00:00): Hello! You use sometimes the misspelled key buiding instead building. If you correct this please delete the misspelled key also. To find this key please use https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Tto
SomeoneElse (2020-05-08 12:08:44+00:00): Hello,
Just for info, I noticed that Perth Water looked a bit dry, and that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/801295524 was part of the relation twice, so I removed the second example.  With a bit of luck that will sort things out.
Best Regards,
Andy
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-06 17:19:48+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7494237219/history has nature = tree that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Was it supposed to be natural=tree? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree (though maybe it is not a tree anymore?)
paulrwebster (2024-03-06 17:28:32+00:00): Hi Mateusz,
I have no recollection of this, it was many years ago. Please delete if incorrect,
user_5359 (2020-05-08 04:58:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
kartler175 (2020-05-08 08:19:10+00:00): Es genügt nicht, die outer-Liniie des Multipolygons zu löschen. Es ist auch das Multipolygon selbst zu löschen! Wenn Du die Prüffunktion von JOSM nutzen würdest, würden sonst Fehler angeszeigt.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=9.38729&lat=49.45268&zoom=14&opacity=1.00
Das Löschen ist ist aber gar nicht nötig! Man kann auch Zug um Zug vom Rand her kleinere Flächen von der großen abtrennen, ohne vorher einen Kahlschlag zu veranstalten.
Und bitte lasse Straßen von Bewuchs frei und kartiere aufcder gleichen Flächen nure eine Flächennutzung..
marczoutendijk (2023-07-27 18:30:21+00:00): What is the meaning of leisure=* ??
angys (2020-06-11 16:54:18+00:00): Where is the source for those road names?
kucai (2020-06-12 04:21:01+00:00): Why is everything in CAPS?
Fyodor Shevchenko (2020-05-13 20:18:18+00:00): Что такое "Посьолок"? Откуда вы это взяли. Там весь район называется "Лесок".
Myazyk (2020-05-14 20:53:34+00:00): Українською, будь ласка, в Україні
Adam Franco (2020-05-07 19:47:00+00:00): The description is not for advertising copy. Please locate business POIs at the actual location -- this looks to be placed in the roadway.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84837488
Famlam (2020-06-06 15:37:47+00:00): Dag A67-A67, klopt het dat de waterstraat voor fietsers niet meer vanaf de Weurtseweg te bereiken is door linksaf te slaan? Ik ben er nog niet langsgereden, wellicht weet jij dit?
A67-A67 (2020-06-20 16:54:31+00:00): Hallo Famlam,
Ik heb hier de routes aangepast aan de bestaande kaart. Er liepen namelijk fietsroutes over de weg, terwijl er een fietspad ingetekend was.
Famlam (2020-06-20 18:35:24+00:00): Dankjewel voor je reactie! Ironisch genoeg heb ik net een paar uur geleden die fietspaden weer verwijderd, 't zijn gewoon fietsstroken / cycleway=lane, zonder afscheiding van de weg, bleek na nadere inspectie ter plaatse. (Mapillary upload verschijnt binnenkort online) 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86915684
user_2066394 (2020-05-07 15:31:15+00:00): ist der briefkasten abgebaut worden?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84838584
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-05-19 00:18:19+00:00): essa via parece nao existir: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/801311733/history#map=18/-20.34228/-41.64484
SHARCRASH (2020-05-08 01:06:55+00:00): Hello! 
Please do not combine access=no + "specific access tags"=yes (such as foot=yes or bicycle=yes). It is illogical to combine a general restriction with specific allowances. You should have guessed though by viewing how the map is rendered by combining those as you did: it shows the way greyed out, therefore not accessible. Users who do not have access to OSM's data and just view the map can't neither see the data combination you entered. 

Also if you can remember of other locations where you did such combination, please correct it.

Thanks for your comprehension!
SHARCRASH (2020-05-08 01:07:10+00:00): Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84838995
highflyer74 (2020-05-12 16:18:24+00:00): Moin!

Mir fiel der Name des Hofladens hier ins Auge. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass er "Unser Hofladen in Dünenfähr" heisst. Denke daran, dass wir name=* nur für Eigennamen verwenden, und nicht für Beschreibungen. Wo der Laden ist, ergibt sich aus dem Ort, an dem er gemappt ist. Ich würde eher sagen, dass er "Werner" heisst. Das kann man auch auf der Website (die übrigens auch falsch verlinkt ist) sehen. Der richtige Link wäre https://www.werner-derspargelhof.de/hofladen-duenenfaehr.html.

In das operator=* Tag sollte die Firma gesetzt werden. Also in diesem Fall "Werner OHG".

Dann könntest Du auch noch das Haupt-Tag in shop=farm ändern, welches noch etwas genauer beschreibt, um was es sich handelt.

Mir fielen auch noch die Gebäude auf, die Du (schon vor längerer Zeit) hinzugefügt hast. Danke dafür! Sei so nett, sie nach dem Einzeichnen rechtwinklig zu machen, wie sie es auch in Wirklichkeit sind. Das kann man mit jedem Editor per Knopfdruck.

Ich hänge Dir unten ein paar Links dran. Lies sie Dir gern mal durch, wenn Du Zeit hast.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich gern!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
user_2066394 (2020-05-07 15:17:11+00:00): ist das tatsächlich ein taxistand oder eher firmensitz?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dtaxi
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84839427
SomeoneElse (2020-05-08 11:53:14+00:00): Hello ChangwooRyu,
Thanks for tidying up some of the political edits around here.  As you may have noticed I've tried to get in touch with a number of the editors (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3680 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3681 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3682 ) to explain how OSM handles disputed areas and how to create a map in their language.
However, as it currently exists in OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6144018982 makes no sense.  It is currently tagged as a "place=village" yet it is in the middle of the sea where no village can possibly be.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
창우 류 안녕하세요
여기 주변의 정치적 편집 내용을 정리해 주셔서 감사합니다. 아시다시피 여러 편집자와 연락을 시도했습니다 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3680, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3681, https OSM이 분쟁 지역을 처리하는 방법 및 해당 언어로지도를 작성하는 방법을 설명하려면 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3682)를 참조하십시오.
그러나 현재 OSM에 존재하므로 https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6144018982는 의미가 없습니다. 현재 "place = village"로 태그되어 있지만 마을이없는 바다 한가운데 있습니다.
친애하는,
OSM의 Data Working Group을 대표하는 Andy Townsend.
ChangwooRyu (2020-05-08 14:07:52+00:00): Hello. The useless node "독도리" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6144018982) refers the administrative unit "리" (which is from word "village" but not necessarily one village) which covers the islets. Lots of "리"'s in South Korea are mapped in this way (For example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5426702271 in the middle of mountain)  I have no idea whether it's the correct way to map or not.
SomeoneElse (2020-05-08 18:45:32+00:00): > I have no idea whether it's the correct way to map or not.

It's not the usual way that it's done in most other countries, no.  Most people follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place where "A named place that has no population" would be mapped as "place=locality".  Alternatively, draw the admin boundary around the place and give that a name.
Best Regards,
Andy
ChangwooRyu (2020-05-08 19:04:13+00:00): 리(Ri) is the official administrative unit used in rural areas but drawing boundaries is not a trivial job. I guess these were mapped as nodes because it was difficult to tell exact boundaries in rural areas, as satelite imageries showed nothing and access was often limited. And using government sourced data is illegal.

Anyway I just reverted the node to the state before vandalism. I'm sure the vandalist deleted this node to remove Korean adminnistrative thing than "fixing" the wrong village node.  :)
SomeoneElse (2020-05-08 23:03:14+00:00): > Anyway I just reverted the node to the state before vandalism.
Yes - I did realise you didn't add it here in the first place :)
The other one (currently a place=locality) is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4530280571
ChangwooRyu (2020-05-09 15:59:02+00:00): I moved the node to where the village chief lives as far as known. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84943004

Thanks for your comments!
SomeoneElse (2020-05-10 11:37:03+00:00): Thanks - that makes more sense!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-16 10:25:12+00:00): لماذا أزيل هذا العنصر:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12ry
kartonage (2020-05-08 10:16:37+00:00): Hej

Please don't use OpenStreetMap for personal bookmarks.

Thanks.
Glassman (2020-05-08 19:17:43+00:00): Are these roads open to the public? Should they be classified as highway=service + service=driveway? Normally highway=residential are not private. (Private ownership doesn't mean no access, it just means that the local government isn't responsible for their maintenance.)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84840576
abdurohman (2020-05-07 18:50:33+00:00): 1
Allison P (2021-02-14 19:20:45+00:00): Check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/801325753. It's tagged building=g.
daniel_solow (2021-02-14 23:05:23+00:00): Thanks for the catch! I was tagging a bunch of houses/garages in JOSM and this one slipped. 
openstreetmap.org/way/801325753
Mashin (2020-05-07 17:02:08+00:00): Is the "Riversdale Farms building 1" an official name of that building or just its description? If the latter then the name tag should not be used. One could mark it as operator = "Riversdale Farms". (if there are more buildings then ref = 1 can be added).
Otherwise good job!
killerbunny (2020-05-07 17:23:13+00:00): Hi Mashin, thanks for encouragement...my first time editing.
Riverdale Farms is an old dairy farm repurposed into a shopping complex. All of the original buildings have a sign attached with a number "1" through "19"
killerbunny (2020-05-07 17:39:38+00:00): How do I add the "operator" and the "ref" attribute?
Mashin (2020-05-07 19:54:52+00:00): In iD, you can add new tags either thorough "Add field" or scroll down and expand "Tags" section. 

I see. In more complicated situations, more nuancing and personal judgement might be required. 
If it was the former official name. Then old_name=... can be used.
Do people still refer to it in that way? Ten perhaps alt_name=...
If it was not the name but more like name of operator, then perhaps disused:operator=... But OSM does not really store historical data, so this is more controversial and the use is more for closed down buildings that no one has turned into new business yet.
Sandal man (2021-05-10 21:05:58+00:00): Hola Jordi,
¿por qué debería ser un camino forestal?
Es la carretera de Lleus y Calp.
El camino también está pavimentado y se usa con frecuencia.
No se parece a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track?uselang=en pero exactamente igual a este
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
Jordi MF (2021-05-12 17:36:00+00:00): Hola Sandal man,

Pues sí, tienes razón. Cuando pasé por ahí hace un año, entendí que el camino simplemente llevaba a diversos campos de cultivo. Aunque esté asfaltado, si es un camino que conduce a campos de cultivo debe ser track. Pero no es este caso. El Camí de Lleus transcurre hasta Calp y por tanto comunica poblaciones. Ahora lo cambio. El Camí d'Albinyent, aunque no es el trayecto más corto, parece que también puede usarse para comunicar con unas masías que hay... Ahora lo modificaré y me dices qué opinas. Si lo consideras, cámbialo.
Saludos,
Jordi
Sandal man (2021-05-13 06:55:48+00:00): Bien Jordi
Mashin (2020-05-07 17:04:20+00:00): All good. Keep on going!
user_5359 (2020-05-07 18:33:16+00:00): Hello! You use sometimes the misspelled key buiding instead building. If you correct this please delete the misspelled key also. To find this key please use https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Tto
Frans S (2020-06-01 13:22:15+00:00): Hello Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. Please tag the buildings you map with the tag building=yes. See the instructions.
Residential highways are  only used in urban areas. Not in the open 
Did you read the instructions what and how to map highways. You mapped to much not needed highways, 
See this document
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
Best regards
glibbertorsten (2020-05-07 17:03:20+00:00): Haha, ich bin eine Stunde zu spät...
:-))
mikelmaron (2020-08-16 16:54:39+00:00): Hi! Is this a real place?
user_8466505 (2020-08-16 17:47:41+00:00): I'm pretty sure this is the house of the user who defined it, which is not allowed. I'd remove it.
user_8466505 (2020-08-16 17:48:05+00:00): *The name, not the address.
Schierkolk (2020-08-16 18:19:47+00:00): This is my house. Feel free to fix it. I was looking at using overpass to do historic queries and was using the tags in my house as an example.
mikelmaron (2020-08-16 19:13:51+00:00): @Schierkolk thanks -- I'll remove. It's showing up on live maps :)
artem95vlasovets (2020-05-15 14:24:22+00:00): Hello. You have added a lot of commercial territories. Are you sure they're all commercial? Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84842890
Athul_John_Kurian (2020-05-15 14:41:41+00:00): Yes. It is a big town. It might look like congested houses. But they are commercial areas.
Thanks.
baptistemm (2020-05-07 19:10:01+00:00): Première modification, bravo
Britzz (2020-05-08 15:21:02+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : c'est OK

Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).
Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84843703
zyphlar (2022-01-18 08:08:04+00:00): What is `layer=POCKET`? Shows as a validation error in JOSM.
ZeLonewolf (2022-01-19 09:58:55+00:00): It was there from the original import, looks like. I'd recommend deleting it.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2020-05-10 23:12:17+00:00): Hej,

Rundkørsler skal ikke navngives efter de veje de forbinder (Fx Gartnerbyen)

Wikien siger:
==
Naming
Roundabout with individual name

Only if the roundabout itself has a name, the name=* key is applied (such as John's Junction). It should not use the name of a road it connects.

If the roundabout does not have an individual name, the name=* tag is not used. 
==
parsd51 (2020-05-11 08:39:05+00:00): Hej
Tak for hjælpen, jeg retter det.
Hilsen
parsd51
DP24PH (2020-05-07 17:12:59+00:00): Change logs (continuation of earlier changeset 84831556):
1. Standardisation of the 'highway=trunk' tag, regardless of its use
2. Lane management fixes within PH-1/AH26/C-4/EDSA, including designated bus lanes, lane assist
3. Internal roadways within TriNoma are marked as indoors
Raphael Cavalcante (2020-05-07 17:22:20+00:00): Moro nessa rua e sei que esse é o verdadeiro nome
RicoElectrico (2020-05-08 10:05:32+00:00): Hej, nie trzeba oznaczać tego faktu poprzez access=no. Domyślnie pojazdy silnikowe nie mają dostępu do highway=path (i jest to motor_vehicle=no).
Awania Morish (2020-05-09 15:24:43+00:00): footway created at wrong place
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84845602
Gustavo22Soares (2020-12-12 00:14:01+00:00): oi eu n acho que a etiqueta leisrue=park seja a mais adequada poderia me dizer qual era seu objetivo para acharmos juntos uma descrição melhor?
Frans S (2020-06-24 10:44:01+00:00): Hello Wei Xia Pui

Thanks for mapping here
A remark. 
Please square all buildings (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. None of the buildings you have mapped are fair squared.
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct squared. Therefore use the Q key after calling it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.

Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas
Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu
It alerts you on warnings and errors.
Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.
Best regards and keep mapping
daganzdaanda (2023-03-09 22:02:56+00:00): Gia sou Achilleas, I hope you can still read this after three years...

You added a lot of "tourism=viewpoint" nodes. I think you might not have found the right tag for what you were trying to express. Could you explain what you were trying to do?

automatic translation:
Γεια σου Αχιλλέα, ελπίζω να το διαβάζεις ακόμα μετά από τρία χρόνια...

Πρόσθεσες πολλούς κόμβους "tourism=viewpoint" (θέαση). Νομίζω ότι ίσως δεν βρήκες την κατάλληλη ετικέτα για αυτό που ήθελες να εκφράσεις. Θα μπορούσες να εξηγήσεις τι προσπαθούσες να κάνεις;
Frans S (2020-06-25 09:03:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A remark. You map many clusters of buildings and call them 1 building.
Please map each building separately and accurate. Also square each building with the Q key
Best regards
VRT OSM (2020-05-07 22:41:54+00:00): Beste StilleBever
Dit gebied is onlangs geïnventariseerd door een speciaal team voor natuurbrand bestrijding van de Veiligheidsregio Twente en Gelderland. Met speciale 4x4 bosbrand bestrijdingsvoertuigen en is dit gebied in kaart gebracht. Dit digitale kaartmateriaal met de tag fire-path helpt ons bij een natuurbrand deze te bestrijden in bijvoorbeeld Aamsveen. Het OSM kaart materiaal wordt gebruikt om eenheden te volgen en te navigeren. Helaas heeft u enkel uren werk verwijderd.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Mike namens de Veiligheid Regio Twente.
user_2066394 (2020-05-07 22:16:52+00:00): siehe hierzu conditional restrictions für geschwindigkeiten:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions
Mark R Naird (2020-05-07 18:09:32+00:00): Please use "speaking" changeset comments!
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 14:18:11+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 11078099 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 15:43:52+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11078105
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 15:46:22+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11078106
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 15:57:20+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11078097
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 18:51:35+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11078101