piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2020-07-16 13:15:02+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
ericpremraju (2020-07-09 02:20:26+00:00): Please provide proper description for the changeset
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87674437
korolenok (2020-07-10 15:17:25+00:00): Hi, Greg! Rob wash/wash?! Is it correct?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87674900
aceman444 (2020-07-13 22:11:40+00:00): Hallo! Man beschreibt die Objekte nicht mit name=Grünland! Und die 'description' die Du da machst sind auch sinnlos. Ich werbe alles was Du gemacht hast reparieren oder entfernen. Bitte lese https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page bevor Du noch was in der Slowakei zeichnest.
Nakaner (2020-09-11 21:14:00+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz den Fahrbahnbelag der K 521 zwischen Kölleda und Battgendorf von cobblestone auf asphalt geändert. Was war der Anlass für diese Änderung? Leider geht aus deinem Änderungssatzkommentar nicht wirklich hervor was bzw. warum du die Straße geändert hast, weshalb ich nachfrage.

Viele Grüße

Michael


PS Bitte gib bei künftigen Änderungssätzen einen aussagekräftigen Kommentar beim Hochladen an. Siehe hierzu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
JausG2 (2020-09-12 20:09:36+00:00): Hallo. Es ging hauptsächlich um den Bach Schafau. Hab die Straße vielleicht versehentlich geändert, weiß ich heute nicht mehr. Sorry.
zuicz (2020-10-23 19:37:50+00:00): https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suchy_zbiornik_przeciwpowodziowy_w_Krzanowicach
Część terenu zalewowego jest na terytorium Czech
maraf24 (2020-10-23 19:57:26+00:00): Nie wiem jednak, czy tu w ogóle można wyznaczyć obszar terenu zalewowego. Na ISOK są małe różnice wysokości.
A ze starych zdjęć wynika, że "budowa zbiornika" to była tylko zapory czołowej, reszty nie ruszano.
zuicz (2020-10-24 16:47:50+00:00): No bo po co mieli ruszać te łąki.
Według mnie obszar zbiornika jest do wydłużenia wraz z kawałkiem terenu na terenie Czech. Wtedy będzie miał na mapie powierzchnię ok. 25 ha czyli tyle, ile ma w rzeczywistości. Dokładnych granic rzecz jasna nie wyznaczymy.
Zatigem (2020-07-08 16:18:43+00:00): Salut phil2FER78 et merci pour tes contributions ! 
Étant de la région, je suis passé par là et cela m'a surpris que tu ai pu accéder à cette zone. N'y avais-t-il aucun panneau "interdit d'entrer" ? Enfin est-ce normal que ce chemin soit déconnecté des deux côtés? merci :)
phil2FER78 (2020-07-08 16:51:34+00:00): Bonjour Zatiranik,
Il s'agit probablement d'un bug ! J'ai fait les modifs qui s'imposent ! Non, il n'y avait pas de panneau puisque c'est un chemin qui longe certaines propriétés privées (Voir le site Umap - Massif de l'Hautil) et donne accès à proximité de la cheminée aérienne. (Voir sur le site Mappilary)
Cordialement. Et bonne promenade !
artem95vlasovets (2020-07-10 13:44:55+00:00): Hi! You created a lot of dragged nodes in this changeset. (for example, way!823657819  way!823654429, way!823653072, way!823656772 and way!823656467 ) Please, fix it. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87676364
ZLima12 (2020-07-11 07:34:00+00:00): It seems as though you've marked both Ossining High School and its soccer field as "Ossining High School". I have not yet fixed this, so you can try to correct it if you wish.
marczoutendijk (2020-08-01 08:55:41+00:00): Hi mackboat,
Why did you not correct your edits as requested by user Zlima12?

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
flohoff (2020-07-10 12:41:49+00:00): Moin,
guck hier nochmal - Wenn ich das im overlay sehe muss da noch ein node existieren mit "Städtisches Gymnasium" - Kann das sein?

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87676971
flohoff (2020-07-10 12:39:55+00:00): Moin,
die Widuking Siedlung ist doch nicht wirklich ein Stadtteil oder? Evtl guck mal ob da "neighborhood"  als place besser passt.

Hamlet ist es definitiv nicht. Da hast du recht.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87677133
luisforte (2020-07-07 23:26:28+00:00): Companheiro, não esqueças que o Rio Guadiana, quando faz fronteira, deve assumir os dois nomes, "Río Guadiana / Rio Guadiana" (Primeiro a designação em castelhano, pois é onde nasce o rio). 
Tal como estava a designação, "Guadiana", essa ambiguidade não existia.
Saludos, Luis
luisforte (2020-07-08 00:03:18+00:00): E, naturalmente, o Guadiana não se designa "Río Guadiana", em Portugal.
Mais uns saludos, Luis
kapazao (2020-07-08 13:09:46+00:00): Hello, I have fixed it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87712840
Thank you for your comments, regards
topolusitania (2020-07-08 13:26:11+00:00): "naturalmente, o Guadiana não se designa "Río Guadiana", em Portugal.."
Podes explicar melhor  porque não devo chamar Rio Guadiana ao traço ou área a azul que o representa no mapa?
luisforte (2020-07-08 13:53:22+00:00): kapazao:
Thanks. I'll correct later the name of the segments of the river to it's portuguese name where it applies (inside portuguese territory)
luisforte (2020-07-08 13:54:10+00:00): topolusitania:
Nem eu disse isso, porque o rio se chama  efectivamente Rio Guadiana em Portugal.
 Mas é claro para mim que Río Guadiana não é a sua designação em território português.
topolusitania (2020-07-08 18:03:06+00:00): Posso portanto concluir que o problema está nos meus óculos. ;-)
flohoff (2020-07-10 10:48:01+00:00): Moin,
das hier ist eine sehr seltsame kombination.

Ein highway=unclassified ist erstmal eine öffentliche Straße. Wie kann die dann access=private sein. Es gibt kein Schild nach StVO das das Beschildern kann (Und wir taggen nur access restrictions die auch nachweisbar da sind).

Wenn das wie ich nach Luftbild vermute eine Haus/Hofzufahrt ist dann ist das kein unclassified sondern ein highway=service. Und das access=private solltest du in einem Note beschreieben welche Schilder da wirklich stehen.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87677344
flohoff (2020-07-10 10:46:10+00:00): Moin,
wenn du ein access=private tagst brauchst dsu kein foot=private mehr taggen. Access beinhaltet das ebenso wie ein motor_vehicle. Das ist im überigen auf footwaysy sowieso über weil auf footways keine motor_vehicle fahren dürfen.

Ansonsten ist es bei *=private immer sinnvoll auf einem Note zu hinerlassen warum.

Nur weil ein Schild "Privatweg" steht heisst das nicht das der nicht benutzt werden darf.

Erst ein "Betreten verboten" wäre dann sowas wie access=private.

Durchfahrt verboten wäre dann ein "vehicle=destination"

So long

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87677420
flohoff (2020-07-10 10:44:00+00:00): Moin,
für so überschneidungen hab ich mal nen debug layer gebaut der alle paar Stunden updated. Da siehst du wenn objekte übereinander liegen oder ineinander ragen.

Das hier ist das mit den Hierarchieen - D.h. nen leisure der irgendwo rein ragt.

Oben über "Back to database list" kriegst du noch andere views.

https://osm.zz.de/dbview/?db=landuseoverlap-owl&layer=hierarchy#51.73266,9.03419,14z

Happy mapping

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87677522
pitscheplatsch (2020-07-11 13:06:31+00:00): Welcome, in the middle of nowhere?
skorasaurus (2020-07-09 20:30:28+00:00): hi, 

thanks for editing and welcome to openstreetmap. 

As a clevelander, a couple suggestions: 
- the OSIP 6 inch imagery layer is more accurate and sharper than maxar. 

Could you clarify what the #bte means? The changeset comments let fellow users know what types of edits were made. 

For example, for one of yours, it could be "adding buildings in parma using mapwith.ai" 

lastly, if you're a part of an organized group editing, have your leader please review https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines 

regards,
will
user_8466505 (2020-07-10 23:38:51+00:00): BTE stands for Build the Earth. It's a Minecraft thing. See the OSM Slack for more info.


TheAdventurer64
Frans S (2020-07-13 14:19:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. A lot of buildings were mapped accurate. but in the northeast corner you mapped buildings oversized and not accurate (tired?)  When a farm f.i, exists out of multiple buildings, don't collect them in mapping. map each building individual.
Please solve also the issues of the triangle on the right hand menu.
See this page with your work and the adjustments which have been made
Best regards
ZeLonewolf (2020-07-08 13:40:02+00:00): Hello, please be aware that this change broke the Jeffersonville boundary relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/127622).  I've fixed it, but in the future please be sure to use the JOSM validator to prevent this issue!
mariotomo (2022-05-28 19:38:50+00:00): hola. estás muy seguro que esa calle se llame "Mangüito", con dieresis?
woodpeck (2020-07-08 09:13:26+00:00): Dear Veojson, you are changing name tags in Algeria from Arabic lettering to a mix of French and Arabic. Is there any community agreement on doing this, or is it just something you are doing on your own? If there is community agreement, please point me to the relevant discussions. If you are doing this on your own, please stop.
Frans S (2020-07-11 12:07:15+00:00): Hello Hyeonah Kim
A remark. The quality of your mappings is still below the standards of HOTOSM 
Please improve your skills. !
Correct also the issues which comes up in ID editor
Please uses also the Hashtags of this project,
Can you please confirm that you have read my message ?
Best regards
Supaplex (2020-07-08 04:13:28+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87678869
Kovoschiz (2020-07-08 10:15:32+00:00): Don't use `old_name=`. It suggests the hotel or any pre-existing feature is renamed. Use `was:*=` for repurposed features like this. Also, this is the `tourism=hotel` / `landuse=commercial` outline, not `building=hotel` outline.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87679302
Kovoschiz (2020-07-08 10:17:18+00:00): But is it this also requisitioned?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87679302
minghong (2020-07-29 03:25:44+00:00): Sorry I mixed up the 2 hotels
WatchPower (2020-09-26 02:51:01+00:00): aerial imagery, not anything elses
TravGW (2020-07-08 11:41:32+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your edits to map. To help you make better buildings you can press the 'Q' button to square the corners of the building. It'll look much better that way. 

Happy mapping!
WatchPower (2020-09-26 02:51:18+00:00): aerial imagery, no thing elses
yadathot (2020-07-08 03:07:14+00:00): Added Driveway as per Private Maxar imagery.
Supaplex (2020-07-08 04:10:47+00:00): 看到這就想到農航所跑來售圖
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1447653502/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87680707
陳建忠 (2020-07-08 04:27:56+00:00): 農航所已經搬家了，現在只有台北工作站還在這!!
Supaplex (2020-07-08 05:05:27+00:00): 其實只是想嘴農航所跑來賣圖資
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87680707
user_2066394 (2020-07-19 15:44:40+00:00): hier hat es dir die Bertelestraße ein wenig nach oben verzogen?
ManOfSteal (2020-07-19 20:55:24+00:00): Uiuiui, das kommt davon, wenn man alles am kleinen Handybildschimm macht... Ist korrigiert. Danke!
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-07-08 21:02:26+00:00): Please provide reason why to upgrade the road to some class. Can revert, then bring this up to talk-ph.
ortho_is_hot (2020-07-08 04:26:52+00:00): Hi there, what's the source for this changeset as none is listed in the tagging?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
JJIglesias (2020-07-08 06:37:01+00:00): La zona de cultivos q marcaste, No es una zona agricola, e incluiste zonas de lotes baldios pero que NO tienen sembradios
5m4u9 (2020-07-09 04:12:35+00:00): hmm... en ambas imagenes maxar y bing (antiguas) hay sembradios o esa info que dices es más reciente?
JJIglesias (2020-07-09 08:43:44+00:00): La q el marco y yo borre era una zona de lotes, que incluian muros y ningun sembradio
Frans S (2020-07-08 09:54:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Your mappings should be more accurate and squared. Don't connect nodes to other objects like roads.
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards
Frans S (2020-07-08 10:15:11+00:00): Hi. Here is an example of your mapping and how it should be.
Left is original. right , after correction
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xj7Tas1fTTL5fjOBqg5ynA4kx7GGEbmp/view?usp=sharing
Please map accordingly
Best regards and keep mapping
Glassman (2020-07-08 17:27:22+00:00): TIP: square the house by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87683155
Frans S (2020-07-09 10:47:50+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent recommendation: 
Please map each building accurate and square it (rectangular) with the Q key in the editor. Keep the building selected during pressing the Q key
Most buildings are good rectangular and the mappings should reflect that.
A hand drawn building is mostly not correct rectangular. Therefore use the Q key after mark it a building and the object is still selected. 
Be aware that this will not work when the deviation to a square corner is to big. Then you have to adjust the building manually . After that you can square it again.


Never let a node of a building connect to other features, like highways, other buildings  or residential areas.
To avoid that , In iDeditor keep the Alt key down while drawing the building. In JOSM keep the Ctrl key down

Map each building individually. do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building

Please pay also attention on the issue triangle on the right-hand menu 
It alerts you on warnings and errors.

Please (try to)solve these before uploading your work.

Best regards and keep mapping !
Euskirchener (2020-07-09 12:29:35+00:00): Moin,
hier wie besprochen die Info vor Korrektur: Da der Weg keine Beschilderung hat sind die Attribute "access=no", "bicycle=yes", "foot=yes" nicht erforderlich. Ein highway=path hat als Standard die Werte für Fußgänger und Fahrradfahrer auf yes und Autos auf no gesetzt, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany. Tschau,
Euskirchener
themartinix (2020-07-10 13:02:13+00:00): Paßt; bin da vorgestern lang geradelt. Umwege erhöhen die Ortskenntnis.
Danke...
sroof (2020-11-09 23:15:36+00:00): Most of path 9422876 crosses private property and at least one property owner does not give permission for public access. Plus the path is blocked by many fallen trees and is flooded in places by beaver ponds. Can we delete this path?
nambim (2020-11-10 08:55:06+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for sharing the information about the area, Since you have the necessary info please go ahead and make the necessary changes. Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
nambim.
Josuer (2020-08-27 00:28:42+00:00): Hola Ackotzz, 
Qué bueno que estés mapeado Chiapas, hace mucha falta. En este cambio agregaste la Calle Tejería, sin embargo está otra calle encimada (cerrada 9 de Enero), no quise borrar hasta saber cuál es la correcta. Si Tejería es Correcta, porfa elimina la otra y conecta Tejería con la pequeña privada. Muchas gracias, saludos.
Ackotzz (2020-08-28 02:19:40+00:00): Muchas gracias, si falta mucho por hacer bueno revisare es que aun tenia mis dudas también, si puedes corrige la calle para que quede de la mejor manera posible.
Saludos
Ackotzz (2020-08-28 02:39:25+00:00): Ya lo revise y hice la corrección necesaria, gracias por la observación me ayudara a seguir mejorando. Saludos
berndw (2020-07-11 13:06:03+00:00): Hallo TigiPapa

Willkommen bei OpenstreetMap

Dü hast in diesem Changeset mehrere Gebäude gelöscht und dann neu eingezeichnet, das ist wegen der Historie unerwünscht. Bitte ändere bevor Du löschst
Außerdem waren die Gebäude mit Hilfe der besser positionierte ESRI Bilder erfasst, du hast die Bilder von BING verwendet.

Ich schaue mir das an, eventuell werde ich Teile dieses Changesets oder das ganze revertieren

Für Fragen stehe gerne zur Verfügung

Bernd
berndw (2020-07-11 13:13:07+00:00): Die Änderungen in der Kaserne habe ich zurückgesetzt, die in H-G lasse ich erst mal so

Bernd
Mike Raust (2020-07-08 17:52:17+00:00): Are you sure that importing CanVec in 2020 is still a good idea?
Hannes Röst (2021-06-26 03:45:47+00:00): Is there a better source / alternative approach? The wikipage describes the import process https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:CanVec and I try to fix all issues that occur
gurglypipe (2020-07-08 09:23:47+00:00): Hi, can you clarify what happened to the Owl and the Pussycat restaurant please? Their website says they’re still open. Thanks
Dylan Webb (2020-07-08 09:26:35+00:00): Oh i just changed the outline to be more accurate for the Build The Earth Project
gurglypipe (2020-07-08 09:40:42+00:00): I see. Unfortunately there are a few issues with your edit. Primarily, you deleted all the existing metadata from the restaurant, including its name and address; and you relabelled it as a hotel. The new outline isn’t square (you can square a building up by pressing ‘Q’ with it selected in the editor).

There were some issues with the metadata of your changeset too: please keep edits localised, rather than combining changes from North-West England and Alaska into one changeset. And please provide a changeset description which actually describes what you’ve changed and why you’ve changed it (not just ‘s’) so that others know your intentions.

Looking at your changes in Alaska, they don’t look right either. You’ve changed an administrative boundary into a subway.

I’m going to revert this edit. Please take a bit more care in future! :)
Dimacn (2020-07-08 18:34:00+00:00): В очередной раз прошу правильно обозначать дворовые проезды: highway=service + living_street=yes  Подробнее здесь - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
user_5359 (2020-07-08 17:55:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2020-07-08 17:50:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=commercial. Please use building=yes.
LorenzoStucchi (2020-07-09 14:53:34+00:00): Ciao,
Grazie per il tuo contributo e benvenuto nella community di OpenStreetMap!
OpenStreetMap non è solo una mappa ma è un gruppo di persone che contribuisce puoi entrare in contatto con la comunità usando diversi canali, in questa mappa li trovi tutti riportati. https://openstreetmap.community/

Ciao e ancora benvenuto in OSM,
LorenzoStucchi
4004 (2020-07-11 22:43:19+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
ресторан уже не отмечен разве (Рассказов?)
Для отдельных обьектов нужна отдельная точка, и в поле Название мы пишем только название, описание это уже другое поле.
Может будет понятнее, если пройдете обучение в редакторе (значок книги справа)
pitscheplatsch (2020-07-11 13:12:09+00:00): Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

#test #data

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-29 21:19:54+00:00): was it just a mistake, that you used tracktype=3 on this way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105180475
Sanniu (2020-07-13 06:43:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824069818 is missing tags, can you, please, set appropriate tags?