piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
iWowik (2019-06-21 05:11:24+00:00): Смотрите в других местах, как названия наносят на карту, а лучше ознакомьтесь с документацией.
Порядок слов:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Формат номера дома:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr#.D0.90.D0.B4.D1.80.D0.B5.D1.81.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.28addr:.3C.2A.3E.3D.2A.29
Не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или удалять

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148609895/history
iWowik (2019-11-23 20:34:50+00:00): Еще раз приветствую!
Вы вносите номера домов, а откуда вы их берете? Часто их сложно найти.
Takogin (2019-06-21 11:56:57+00:00): Hi! Why did you change main roads to pedestrian ways in the center of the city - it is look suspicious. And i have no any info about it, can you share some?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71342679
Norberto Noa (2019-06-21 19:49:09+00:00): Streets surrounding Cespedes Park are under a process of change.The building in front of the park will be a Museum and streets converted are no longer accesible to vehicles. Hope you understand. Thanks for the note
Takogin (2019-06-24 07:29:40+00:00): Thank you for the explanation!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71342679
PlaneMad (2019-07-29 18:34:18+00:00): Nice work mapping Nagpur. Ive corrected some roads mistakenly tagged as a motorway.
viloan (2019-06-17 20:23:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-06-17 21:07:09+00:00): No addr:street= Stadsgehoorzaal here?
What is Ins Blal? 
The Stadsgehoorzaal is already on the map.
I will delete your contrubution.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-06-17 21:08:02+00:00): reverted by changeset #71344145
eggie (2019-06-17 21:11:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Je hebt een aantal importadressen van het Kadaster verwijderd. Waarom deze actie?
Adresnodes zijn nodig om adressen te vinden.
 Verder zijn alle gebouwen import vanuit het kadaster en als zodanig ingemeten.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-17 21:25:59+00:00): reverted by  changeset #71344554
eggie (2019-06-17 21:26:58+00:00): Je edits zijn teruggezet. wat was je bedoeling. Al je edits komen daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart. Svp niets aan gebouwen en adresnodes veranderen.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-17 21:31:16+00:00): Ik heb de adresnodes uit elkaar gehaald. Je kunt ze nu rustig op de juiste plaats leggen. Niet één adresnode van maken svp.
eggie (2019-06-17 21:32:45+00:00): Over de Kloosterstraat loopt een wandelroute. die kun je met een simpele editor als iD niet bewerken.
Vraag hulo op het forum als je dat wilt doen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-06-18 08:55:17+00:00): PB contact..
sander79 (2019-06-18 13:39:19+00:00): dit is volgens mij niet het juiste gebruik van 'park'.

Een park heeft meestal een naam en beslaat een gebied. 

landuse=grass lijkt me een betere optie in deze situatie
Ernestjw (2019-06-30 14:49:43+00:00): Sorry lees nu pas je opmerking. Er staat alleen niet veel gras op, terwijl het wel heel veel op een park lijkt. Ik ga er over na denken...
eggie (2019-06-17 21:25:28+00:00): reverted by changeset #71344554
eggie (2019-06-17 21:14:28+00:00): De tag construction=yes hoort hier ook niet en kan er af.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-06-17 21:22:01+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #71344483
eggie (2019-06-17 21:15:48+00:00): Vanwaar deze actie? 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71343743
eggie (2019-06-17 21:20:11+00:00): reverted  door Wijzigingenset #71344450
eggie (2019-06-17 22:00:22+00:00): Je hebt hier een gebouw in een gebouw getagd.
Dat is niet de bedoeling. Je kunt wel alle adresnodes bij de ingang leggen omdat hier bv de brieven bussen zijn. Niet combineren svp.
eggie (2019-06-17 21:17:23+00:00): Je hebt hier oneway=yes verwijderd, maar geeft nog wel aan dat fietsers zijn uitgezonderd van eenrichting?
Dan kun je de tag oneway:bicycle=no ook weghalen.
eggie (2019-06-17 22:01:22+00:00): uitzonderingstags voor fietsers heb ik verwijderd
Gr eggie
ACarlotti (2019-11-13 00:26:00+00:00): I've just noticed this changeset, and I disagree with the tagging. You may be correct that these aren't ' normal highways', but they aren't bus guideways either - highway=bus_guideway should be reserved for sections that are physically guided (including perhaps brief road crossings where the guidance resumes immediately after the crossing). The wiki suggests (and I agree) that highway=service would be more appropriate, perhaps in combination with access=no and bus=designated (or something else consistent with local usage).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway
Borbus (2019-11-13 19:00:19+00:00): It's a bus_guideway without guide kerbs. It's not a highway=service. No way. It doesn't feel like one at all. It has car traps. It has special signage and junctions all the way down.

I put a tag guide_kerb=no so that we don't lose the information about the presence or absence of guide kerbs. This conveys much more about the reality of what these ways are, in my opinion.
santamariense (2019-06-18 01:15:10+00:00): Hi leedlelee. Why did you delete the name of these streets? What are you trying to do?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71345024
natureandchill (2019-06-19 18:14:07+00:00): Hello, I was going strictly by IBGE street names and I must have deleted it accidentally. I do apologize for doing deleting it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71345024
santamariense (2019-06-20 00:03:38+00:00): Ok. Don't worry. I'm gonna bring names back to the streets ASAP.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71345024
seewäldler (2019-06-25 07:16:50+00:00): Hallo j1scad!
Gehe ich von der richtigen Annahme aus, daß die diese Änderungen nur aufgrund von Luftbildern gemacht hast, ohne es vor Ort gesehen zu haben? 
Du hast Waldgrenzen verschoben, wo Wald ist und immer war, Apfelbaumplantagen angelegt, wo in Wirklichkeit Zwetschgen, Birnen oder Pfirsiche wachsen,  Waldwege zu Parkplatzzufahrten umfunktioniert, Wege auf Lärmschutzwällen konstruiert und Wegeklassen geändert die so nicht passen.
DannyMcD (2019-06-18 04:28:07+00:00): Matt,
I specifically warned you not to rename roads.  Please let me do this in the future, since I have to go back and review your edits anyway.
Danny
Matthew Darwin (2019-06-18 07:31:44+00:00): I'm not sure what is the problem renaming roads when the city officially renames them?  

I've been doing this for 2 years now because nobody was doing this previously and they all got out of date.
DannyMcD (2019-06-18 09:26:03+00:00): One problem (not the only one) i that I asked you not to rename the roads, and you did so anyway.  I view this as a deliberate insult, and would appreciate an apology.
DannyMcD (2019-06-18 09:34:27+00:00): Other problems:
1) You are using the city's ArcGIS server (the backend of GeoOttawa) as a source.  This is in violation of the terms of service of GeoOttawa, and the data is not in compliance with OSM's licence.   In fact, it is not clear if the public is even meant to have access to this data.  I think it is fair to describe this as a wholesale copyright violation.
2) You are not verifying the correctness of the new road names on the ground.  I am almost certain the street signs weren't all changed yesterday, so you are changing the road names incorrectly.
3) You aren't keeping the old road name (as old_name, for instance).
Matthew Darwin (2019-06-18 13:09:48+00:00): Hi Danny,

We were in the midst of discussing why you didn't feel name changes should be done, but I don't feel we had concluded that discussion and it wasn't clear to me why you were concerned with the process that has been used before.  Sorry for that.

To your specific points, 
1) The primary source of the change is not ArcGIS, it is an e-mail from the City dated usually around 1 month before the name change.  The email start with something like this:  "The Director of Building Code Services, under delegated authority granted by By-law 2014-78, approved [number/type of changes].  These changes are part of the process to resolve confusing street names within the City. 
You are requested to make the necessary adjustments to your records to reflect the new street names and civic numbers as indicated in the tables below. Please make the changes to your records in accordance with the language format used.
Please note some of these streets are physically disconnected and therefore only a portion of these streets are changing.
The change is effective [date]. Location maps are attached for your reference."

2) I do verify the correctness of many of a subset of the streets. I give the city a few days to make the sign changes and then send in inquiries when they are missing.  This was a problem 2 years ago, but has since been much better that signs are updated promptly.
3) I'm happy to add old_name tag or similar.  Nobody previously brought this up as something needing doing.
Matthew Darwin (2019-06-18 13:14:30+00:00): BTW, The reason I check with ArcGIS is is that sometimes in the past the email notification and ArgGIS have not been the same.  Also sometimes the web site was not the same either (but now the web site is out of date).  So I don't make any changes until the multiple data points from the city match each other.
DannyMcD (2019-06-18 14:41:30+00:00): 1)You are still using ArcGIS as a source, which is unacceptable for OSM.  The email is not an acceptable source either, since it is not verifiable by others.  
2) Saying that the signs will eventually change isn't good enough.

Since I apparently wasn't clear enough last time, let me repeat myself: I will view any further street name changes as a personal and deliberate insult. That also goes for address additions (that are based on data in ArcGIS, not Open Data Ottawa).
DannyMcD (2019-06-18 14:56:04+00:00): To solve this problem, this is what you need to do:
1) only make road/address changes based on data in the OpenData Ottawa portal.
2) Delay your changes to take into account the time to change signs.  The easiest way to do this would be to make changes in a batch each year.
Matthew Darwin (2019-07-03 20:13:10+00:00): Street name changes are now posted publicly. I just asked them to update the page.  https://ottawa.ca/en/city-hall/public-engagement/projects/street-name-and-address-changes#street-name-and-address-changes

Street signs have been changed based on my survey.
Matthew Darwin (2019-07-03 20:16:04+00:00): Also if you want on the city's mailing list for address/street change notifications, probably you just need to ask to be added.
kartonage (2019-06-18 21:10:48+00:00): Hallo Anoniman,

vielleicht ist dir das nicht ganz so bewusst, aber leisure=marina entspricht in seiner Bedeutung eher einem Yachthafen bzw. einem Anlegestelle für eine Reihe an privaten Kleinbooten. Das was du hier aber hinzugefügt hast, entspricht eher typischen Rundfahrt-Anlegestellen. Dazu passt dann eher das mooring-Tag.
Vielleicht kannst du dir das ja nochmal anschauen. Danke

Schöne Grüße
Anoniman (2019-06-18 21:49:24+00:00): Hallo kartonage,
Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe die Anlegestellen hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71381392 korrigiert.
Servus
Anoniman
LKS160 (2019-06-17 22:20:51+00:00): Dadelstraat 27 is north of Dadelstraat 25.
Dadelstraat 27 is NOT between 48 and 50
This is the Administrator of Dadelstraat 27
Lodge King Solomon #160
viloan (2019-06-17 22:21:40+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
abrensch (2019-06-23 21:41:31+00:00): Hallo checker,

schaust Du mal hier:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6554088375

Da sperrt ein oneway-zipfel die Strasse in einer Richtung
eggie (2019-06-18 05:41:57+00:00): Dag Avinash... meestal heeft een speelplaats niet de naam "speelplaats ......"
Kijk je nog even? Ook loopt de speelplaats gedeeltelijk door het gebouw.
MVG,
Eggie
viloan (2019-06-17 22:58:54+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-18 10:46:36+00:00): Hi QuestionMonkey, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting many landuse areas which you mapped 14 days ago? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=71346402

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
user_5359 (2019-06-18 18:24:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site). This tag isn't for a single mobile home, this a tag for the hole property.
viloan (2019-06-17 23:15:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
A67-A67 (2019-06-18 21:14:51+00:00): Hallo NBosm,
Je hebt nu een deel van het viaduct op layer=2 gezet. De rest staat nog op layer=1. layer=1 was correct, aangezien de A6 geen layer-tag heeft en dus layer=0 is. Daarmee werd er al aangegeven dat de A6 onder het viaduct door loopt.
A67-A67 (2019-06-18 21:16:10+00:00): Ik heb de layer-tags hersteld naar layer=1.
eggie (2019-06-18 05:31:02+00:00): Beste avinash..  Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus en het doen van edits over een oppervlakte wereldwijd brengt schade toe aan de kaart.
Vaak zijn het onbedoelde verschuivingen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-06-18 05:44:27+00:00): reverted by changeset #71352424
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust. 
MVG,
Eggie
gendy54 (2019-07-02 21:39:18+00:00): Bonjour Cyril,
Un Cyril Renaud dans le 86 qui cartographie une gendarmerie, je me suis dit que ca ne pouvait être qu'un SP ;)
Merci pour ton ajout. On a une page spéciale pour les gendarmeries: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dpolice

Ce sera tout pour ce soir ;)

@drobaux alias gendy54
mappas (2019-06-18 00:31:58+00:00): Resolved note https://www.osm.org/note/1587936
mappas (2019-06-18 00:46:01+00:00): #snfcc
viloan (2019-06-18 00:53:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-06-18 01:02:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Zsolt Medgyesi (2019-06-21 08:08:48+00:00): Hello,

ebben a csomagban csináltál egy átdolgozást egy kereszteződésnél, ami tartalmaz pár technikai hibát:
- A sávokat külön utakként vetted fel. Ezt csak olyan esetekben szokás, ahol fizikai akadály van a két pálya között. Egyéb esetekben az útra elhelyezett sávjelzések, és hajtási irányjelzések  használata a mérvadó.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Turning_indications_per_lane

- a főutakon elég sok egyéb tag és kapcsolat is található, amik ebben a módosításban lemaradtak

magyar és nemzetközi elnevezések és kapcsolatok, magyar útdíjas tag-ek és kapcsolat,...

Ezek miatt szeretném visszavonni ezt a csomagot illetve ha csináltál még hasonló módosításokat, akkor azokat is.
bluggyhal (2019-06-21 09:29:48+00:00): Szia!

Köszönöm szépen a felvilágosítást és a linkeket! Természetesen nyugodtan vond vissza a módosításomat, hogy szabályosan szerepeljenek az adatok.

Kérlek, ha látsz még általam okozott hibát jelezd!

Üdv
Zsolt Medgyesi (2019-06-21 09:56:37+00:00): Hello,

a 86-os úton is találtam egy ilyet, Körmend-Katafa magasságában.

Rémlik még ezeken kívül mostanában olyan szerkesztésed, ahol főút-csomópontokat szerkesztettél át?

Kösz
bluggyhal (2019-06-21 11:57:11+00:00): Három ilyet csináltam az elmúlt időben: Hegyhátsálnál a csillagvizsgálónál,  Hegyalján a régi malom mellett és a katafai focipályától északra eső lehajtónál.
Zsolt Medgyesi (2019-06-21 12:25:27+00:00): Kösz!
Javítva:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71478413
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71477678
DaCor (2020-07-08 18:49:50+00:00): FYI, I removed all the naming you added to this route. These names are not correct as they were only referred to as such during construction. Once opened, the correct route reference took precedence
iandees (2019-06-18 02:39:22+00:00): Hello! Thanks for adding these houses. Make sure that when you add houses you're making them match the outline of the house and using the "Q" key to square the corners. These are clearly not circular houses :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71348225
pitscheplatsch (2019-06-18 10:41:53+00:00): #test #failed

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? Furthermore, can you revert your edits?

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
iWowik (2019-06-21 05:21:08+00:00): Не создавайте фейковых объектов улица для микрорайонов и тому подобных частей города. Есть для этого объекты типа place=neigbourhood, place=quarter, place=suburb
и addr:place вместо addr:street

Не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или удалять
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697897272/history
freebeer (2019-06-20 00:41:09+00:00): sorry for my last changeset comment - written while half asleep.

after a few minutes sleep, i think i know what is going on here as well.  the relation was changed five years ago; it was broken before here as well as in your earlier commented-by-me changeset, but not in a way to be flagged by osmi, so the broken rendering beforehand was not seen by me.

i was probably confused by the one-tag to two-tag difference, not to mention the water(way)=river similarity for two different concepts, as i've been struggling to understand the wiki page when encountering wet map brokenness.

here too i've deleted the redundant outer tagging apart from the differing source tag, and the island/object now renders.

i've found lots of places within the imported canvec data where this has been an issue, to say nothing of old/new-style multipolygons.

anyway, apologies for misunderstanding the change iD has been making - it is actually helping here by highlighting the error to qa tools, without itself detecting the redundant/wrong tagging it has changed.

now to think about sleep