piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
UggiePM (2023-01-13 10:01:55+00:00): No, I don't think that's the case, Bob. This is just me working late night and forgetting to add them as service roads :( sorry about that. I honestly don't know for certain if vehicles are allowed or not as of now, feel free to change the tags if you know that's the case. Or just write here and I'll change them :) thanks for the heads up! cheers
bob3bob3 (2023-01-14 10:51:00+00:00): I can check at the shire office in a day or two (Bruce Rock) just to confirm if any changes. Am happy to change/update them myself. I might even visit the site again in the next few weeks!
UggiePM (2023-01-16 09:45:54+00:00): Thanks man! Check out this route we've built if you'd like :) 
https://bushwalk.com/j/FYKDV3/

Open to all kinds of feedback
BCNorwich (2022-04-18 12:53:50+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You somehow placed your company POI about 5 miles from Fowler Road. You also inadvertently got the tagging quite a bit off of OSM practice.

I've moved to POI and corrected the tagging. I took details from your website. Please check the details and placement here:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1241441247#map=18/51.60747/0.12270&layers=N      Need any help please just ask.


Regards Bernard.
eggie (2022-04-18 17:00:23+00:00): Oke Mario, maar is het pad ook echt weg?  Je kunt ook op een node barrier=gate toevoegen met de nodige accesstags. 
gr eggie
lyctkel (2022-06-11 06:49:44+00:00): Hi b*k*,
handelt es sich bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020255913 um einen Vertipper und ist statt building=z vielleicht building=yes gemeint?
Herzliche Grüsse,
lyctkel
chris66 (2025-03-30 19:04:01+00:00): Hi,
kann das weg?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1029067659
staubjosef (2025-04-02 13:11:10+00:00): Ist weg !
chris66 (2025-04-03 06:55:37+00:00): Danke :)
bxl-forever (2022-04-18 20:38:09+00:00): Hello,

Your changeset is very disturbing.  First, because it covers a very large part of the country, and second because the changeset title says very little about what/why you changed objects.

In particular: Why did you relocate Oxfam shop in Brussels?  AFAIK they are still located on housenumber 137, and their website says so.
https://oxfammagasinsdumonde.be/magasins/bruxelles-bourse/

That would help us see if this is some new information which you personally surveyed, or perhaps a mistake.

Thanks in advance.
Brian@Stone (2022-04-19 03:25:56+00:00): 刚要去改发现已被您抢先了一部，看了看时间3min前，哈哈。棒棒哒！
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-18 09:04:29+00:00): Please don't delete it directly. It still represent something that exists in reality. If the name is wrong, remove that only.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-18 09:10:00+00:00): This was  already corrected to `old_name=`
Kovoschiz (2022-04-18 09:03:08+00:00): 1. Please don't change according to your own preference
2. Descriptive changeset comments please/
kapazao (2022-04-19 15:19:31+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías explicar de dónde has sacado la información de estas ediciones?
No puedo ver muchos de esos elementos en ninguna imagen por satélite.
Por otra parte no entiendo por qué cambiaste los caminos a carreteras, cuando no se ven signos de ser carreteras.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119846306
kapazao (2022-04-19 15:22:19+00:00): Hello, could you explain where you got the information for these editions?
I can't see many of those elements on any satellite image.
On the other hand I don't understand why you changed the paths to highways, when there are no signs of being highways.
Regards
Reino Baptista (2022-04-19 17:43:06+00:00): Hi,
If you are talking about the changes from "track" to "unclassified" that is because these are not simple access to "cultivated land" by tractors (aka as agricultural tracks) but travelling roads without asphalt. 

c.f. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=unclassified 
where is stated:
"Unclassified roads are
  public roads
  less important than tertiary roads
  considered usable by motor cars
  not residential streets or agricultural tracks"

Regarding "La casa del desierto" and "Districthive Podtel - Granada" I just search for comments (and associated photos) written by people that stayed housed there, and also some articles and news on line (a regular Google search with the names).

I use strava in conjunction with ESRI mapping (in JOSM) to better understand the highways. I don't remember changing any "highway=path".

More important...
If you are not comfortable with this changeset, please say so, and I will reverse it.
user_5359 (2022-04-19 19:55:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you add the key Road to building and overpaint existing buildings??
Filip009 (2022-04-24 18:33:30+00:00): Podľa mňa to bolo dobre, tak ako to bolo, nemyslíte?
Patr1k_P (2022-04-25 07:56:16+00:00): bol z toho nazov kriza..malo by to byt nazov miesta alebo oblasti, tak som pridal vrch
Filip009 (2022-04-25 10:54:35+00:00): No neviem, ale mne to podľa popisu nepríde ako nejaký vrch kopca, skorej len ako nejaký pamätný kríž. Ale o tom, či má dobrý name by som trocha pochyboval.
Patr1k_P (2022-04-25 11:05:17+00:00): umiestnili ho na nejakom vrchole, je tam kopec, nazvali to aj vrsok, takze myslim ze to tak moze byt
Filip009 (2022-04-25 11:08:32+00:00): Len vŕšok sa ani nevolá "COVID". To mi tam nesedí.
Patr1k_P (2022-04-25 11:13:10+00:00): tak to uprav ako uznas za vhodne...mne tam zas nesedel kriz s takym nazvom...nie je to nazov kriza, ma to byt nazov toho miesta, insie ma nenapadlo
Filip009 (2022-04-25 15:50:48+00:00): Sú k tomu aj fotky https://www.freemap.sk/?map=16/49.007134/20.363181&layers=XI&image=375183
GinaroZ (2022-04-18 15:33:28+00:00): This car dealership was tagged as closed a month ago https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4051543912/history - have you surveyed it since then?
hanchao (2022-04-19 08:23:13+00:00): 足球场不要了吗？
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Puxan (2022-04-23 17:32:57+00:00): Estoy mapeando en el proyecto 7133 y veo que has mapeado en el, muy bien, pero debes tener más cuidado y no volver a mapear edificios que ya estaban dibujados. 

Muy bien, sigue mapeando

I am mapping in project 7133 and I see that you have mapped in it, very well, but you should be more careful and not re-map buildings that were already drawn.

Very good, keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119849778
BCNorwich (2022-04-19 08:14:33+00:00): Hi, Sorry but again highway=unclassified added to a residential landuse area Way: 32787047  I've removed the inadvertent tag.

Regards Bernard.
karlchick (2022-04-24 21:15:33+00:00): Thank's Bernard, that was a mistake, only meant the change School lane.
SekeRob (2022-04-18 15:41:45+00:00): Hi,

You have a reputation of not responding to observations on your edit sets, yes you have and word goes around, and here you managed to map a footway arond a complex junction and only connect it at start and end but not the other dozen + crossing with trams, road, footways and whatnot, in fact after clicking connect on all the alerts the counter stopped at 30. Please pay attention to what you do.

Hai la reputazione di non rispondere alle osservazioni sui tuoi set di modifiche, sì, e gira la voce, e qui sei riuscito a mappare un marciapiede attorno a un incrocio complesso e collegarlo solo all'inizio e alla fine ma non le altre dozzine + incrocio con tram, strada, marciapiedi e quant'altro, infatti dopo aver cliccato su Collegati su tutti gli avvisi lo sportello si è fermato a 30. Per favore fate attenzione a quello che fate.

cheers

PS Also notified by PM. CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119865672
marczoutendijk (2022-04-22 13:30:57+00:00): Please reply to questions and remarks made here!
Per favore, rispondete alle domande e alle osservazioni fatte qui!
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
SekeRob (2022-04-22 13:49:54+00:00): Marc

He replied to me via PM where I copied the comment to as well, see PS, given that JOSM mappers somehow do not get the comment message if raised via the ID Editor interface, at least that is the observed quasi pattern.
mircozorzo (2022-04-22 16:19:19+00:00): SekeRob, please, avoid addressing me in this tone, worse in a public context. Please can you rephrase your comment? That does not seem to me to be a respectful way to contact me.
SekeRob (2022-04-22 17:25:21+00:00): I'm sorry if you got that impressions from my words. Past experience, no reaction to a previous Change Set of yours I commented on either, a mapper commenting including a list of the edit sets comments you did not respond to boot it draws a picture.

For your interest, an active list of past comments to your edit sets and your replies is actually public: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=224342
Up to you to ignore other mapper observations to your edit sets but it did draw the DWG attention. 

Meaningful CS closing comments is important to know what was done which you haven't. Another data point from your contribution statistics page:

OSM Notes: Closed w/ comment 248 (w/o 224)

Can that be right, closing 248 map notes and 224 done so without indicating why the note was dismissed? If right that means 224 messages to other mappers went out telling them their map not was closed without a reason given.

I can't erase past comments made, but we can move forward and do better expecting the courtesy to all in the volunteer community of why what change(s) were made to include indicating if something needs revisiting / why left unfinished.

TTYL
mircozorzo (2022-04-23 10:40:37+00:00): For me, a dialogue begins with respect and an appropriate tone, otherwise it is a debate that does not interest me.
wkdgs (2022-04-20 11:46:42+00:00): Eigentlich passt fast alles. Du hast die Gebäude ja schon getrennt. D.h. sie tauchen auch auf der Karte getrennt auf. Du kannst also an das Feuerwehrgebäude alle Infos zur Feuerwehr eintragen und an das Schulgelände alle Infos zur Schule.

Das einzige, was nicht passt, ist das Schulgebäude. Das müsste den Tag "building=school" statt "amenity=school bekommen":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dschool
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119850624
kubahahaha (2023-01-24 16:19:36+00:00): Cześć, z tego co widzę M1 zaznaczyłeś w odwrotnych kierunkach - ktoś wyłapał w uwagach:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3530025

Poprawisz? Mogę i ja, ale wiem że staracie się automatyzować jakoś sprawdzanie komunikacji publicznej w Warszawie, to nie chcę się wam wbijać.
starsep (2023-01-24 16:31:03+00:00): Dzięki, poprawiłem :).
Wydawałoby się, że metro akurat będzie utrzymywane aktualne.
Automatyzuję sprawdzanie komunikacji w Warszawie, ale chwilowo bez metra: rozkłady są w innym formacie.
Nic nie szkodzi, aby edytować takie poprawki. Narzędzie ma służyć jedynie do weryfikacji i znajdowania błędów. Dodam jakieś checki na from/to/name/via
arcturusss (2022-04-20 11:35:05+00:00): Добрый день. Сменилась ли вывеска на новую? Если нет, тег name следует оставить прежним.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119850990
Haykaz Mkrtchyan (2022-04-28 09:23:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Ага изменилось
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119850990
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
fabiotofy (2022-04-18 18:21:53+00:00): però il REF NSA56 lo potevi lasciare su tutti gli elementi
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119851575
SekeRob (2022-04-18 11:19:50+00:00): Hi

At least the south east half of the cycleway you tagged with paving stones cover, from where the residential area extends out across the street, has asphalt paving. I know because I cycle this way many times a year.

ciao
Đuro Jiří (2022-04-18 13:18:04+00:00): Grazie per il vostro messaggio. L'ho risolto ora.
PLima785 (2022-04-18 12:21:48+00:00): Obrigado, malta que mete bots a atualizar as etiquetas tem disto.
Existe uma etiqueta antiga que foi descontinuada na definição de sentidos únicos, o chato é que só fazem essa alteração não verificam se partiu algo, podem andar meses até se encontrar todas
Tanzbärli (2022-04-20 07:21:23+00:00): Danke. public_bookcase:type kannte ich noch garnicht. :)
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 16:04:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
BCNorwich (2022-04-19 07:42:20+00:00): Hi, You've added the tag highway=unclassified to a landuse=residential area. I've removed the inadvertent tag. I think that again your mistake was because area outlines are joined onto highway centerlines.  

Please look at any warnings like the 10 crossing highways warning mentioned above, these tell you that there are problems. You could then look at correcting any inadvertent mistakes.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2022-04-19 07:46:45+00:00): Hi, I've removed the tags bridge=yes and layer=1 from the highway Way: Woodvale (493287582).
BCNorwich (2022-04-19 07:44:31+00:00): Hi, again many warnings of probable mistakes are given above.
Davileci (2022-05-24 20:15:32+00:00): Según las Directrices de etiquetado españolas, Medina es una «village» porque tiene menos de 10 000 habitantes y Villarcayo es una «town» por ser capital del partido judicial.
cronoser (2022-05-24 22:18:05+00:00): hola, me guié con la wiki, donde pone que village es un asentamiento mas pequeño que town. Un saludo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:place
tastrax (2022-04-27 03:52:56+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
syntex (2022-04-18 12:02:26+00:00): wycofane
eggie (2022-04-18 15:08:08+00:00): Hi fpkr

Welcome to OSM..
It's not clear in your comment to see the reason to change the tagging of the buoy_cardinal west.
Your comment is no=comment.
You are sure your edits are correct?
https://map.openseamap.org/?zoom=16&lat=53.42367&lon=5.79655&layers=BFTFFFFFFTF0FFFFFFFFFF

your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119855628

Greetz,
eggie
fpkr (2022-04-18 18:31:28+00:00): Hi, i have been to Ameland last week and as I have just completed my sailing licence, I looked out for buoys. At the place where the buoy_cardinal west is in the card i found a buoy_cardinal south. I have take pictures but i dont know how to attach them here. By looking at the pictures i see that the name in the card is also wrong the buoy_cardinal south is named VA8 ZS2
If someone can show me how to attach pictures i will place tem
Gretz Frank
eggie (2022-04-18 18:42:41+00:00): Hi Frank  No need to proof your survey.
It's okay.

Greetz,
eggie
Thierry1030 (2023-05-05 10:09:08+00:00): hello Jhowie,
I was walking here on Wednesday and I didn't find the artwork Fenster. Do you know jow should it look like? Is it outdoor or indoor?
JhowieNitnek (2023-05-05 10:11:07+00:00): It's on top of the building, it was placed there by the gallery owner
Osmwithspace (2023-03-31 10:29:37+00:00): Das ist doch kein Second Hand Laden, oder?
Ich würde es zu 
amenity=social_facility
social_facility=food_bank
ändern.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-06 12:52:29+00:00): note, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457345051/history and many other remain unfixed
MxxCon (2022-04-19 00:59:51+00:00): Hello.
Do you mean by "local resident information"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119856217
Blckmgic (2022-04-19 01:07:13+00:00): Hey there. Verified info with customers and people who have left reviews. Also called the business for anything else. Hours usually because people don't tend to know that.
MxxCon (2022-04-19 04:27:00+00:00): Customers and people who left reviews where? OSM doesn't have reviews...🤨
GinaroZ (2022-04-18 15:27:59+00:00): Reverted. You must not use Google Maps to make changes to OpenStreetMap.
eggie (2022-04-18 16:48:33+00:00): Dag Mavasni..
Ik heb bicycle=yes verwijderd van het fietspad en moped=no en mofa=yes toegevoegd
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-18 16:55:28+00:00): cycleway:both=no verwijderd van highway=cycleway
De ligging van die wandelroute Nederlands Kustpad deel 2 verlegd conform BGT.

gr eggie
Eris-club (2023-03-13 01:27:55+00:00): 背景に使用する地図タイルを古い/新しいだけで判断するべきではありません。
GPSは斜め方向で入る為、山間部では少数のGPSからデータを取得することになり、時間によっては平野部に比べてズレが生じます。
基盤地図情報とは、電子地図における位置の基準となる情報のことで、法律で定義されているものです。
地図には地上で国が測量したデータ、都道府県や市町村が測量したデータが統合され、基準を決められて入っていますので、新旧だけで判断するべきではありません。
user_8655426 (2023-03-16 09:33:05+00:00): Eris-clubさん、こんにちは。
OpenStreetMap は「現在」実際に存在する地物をマッピングするプロジェクトです。(real and current)
「古い」基盤地図情報や「更新されていない」地理院地図を複写するプロジェクトではありません。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Eris-club/history

現地調査や地元知識をもとにOSMを編集していれば、どの画像を背景として使うべきかを判断できるはずです。

「昔の地図」を作りたいのであれば、OpenHistoricalMap を利用してください。
JA:Open Historical Map
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Open_Historical_Map
impiaaa (2022-06-01 18:51:39+00:00): Thank you for adding the maxspeed information. In this changeset though, you also removed the "oneway" tag. That can be very dangerous! Be careful about what changes you're making, and verify that they're accurate, and that they make sense in combination with the other tags and in the context of objects nearby.
WAM_SNZ144_ZCH (2022-05-05 01:09:58+00:00): Hallo Jens Hohmann
Ich bitte sie nicht einfach Datensätze von anderen Usern im OSM zu ändern wenn sie sich nicht zu 100% dabei sicher sind. Gerne können sie Personen auf Änderungsvorschläge oder Fehler hinweisen. Halten sie sich bitte an die Regeln im OSM-Wiki. 
Im untenstehenden Link können sie ihr Tag nochmals im Wiki nachlesen. 
Liebe Grüsse WAM_SNZ144_ZCH

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building=service
Dan_Fi (2022-05-11 07:18:06+00:00): Moin deierstoiner!

Nun ist die Baustelle vorbei, die Straße ist aber durch Deine Änderungen leider für ein Routing aktuell nicht nutzbar.
Schade! Es wäre schön, wenn man solche Änderungen dann auch selbst wieder rückgängig macht, wenn die Zeit der Baustelle abgelaufen ist.
Grundsätzlich sollten solche temporären Sperrungen nicht so eingetragen werden. 

Mehr dazu findest Du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction

Durch solche Änderungen sind die Straßen dann dauerhaft "kaputt".
Das ist für mache Router, die nicht alle 14 Tage ein Update ziehen, echt schwierig, weil sie solche Baustellen dann lange "mitschleppen".
deierstoiner (2022-05-11 07:52:56+00:00): Hallo,
die Straße wurde auch falsch im Routing als offen angezeigt, obwohl es eine mehrwöchige Sperrung gab, deren Ende in heutigen Zeiten leider schlecht sicher abzusehen ist. Momentan verlängern sich vielerorts Bauzeiten um ein Vielfaches.

Du hast offensichtlich bemerkt, dass die Sperrung nicht mehr aktuell ist und statt die Karte wieder anzupassen entschieden, lieber zu meckern, statt etwas produktives zu tun. Schade! Es wäre schön, wenn du deine Energie besser einsetzen würdest.

Es gibt Menschen, die gelegentlich auch andere Dinge tun, als täglich alle Änderungen nachzuverfolgen.

Ansonsten bleibt festzuhalten, dass die OSM grundsätzlich nicht für "manche Router" optimiert wird.
Dan_Fi (2022-05-11 08:57:53+00:00): Hallo deierstoiner,

vielen Dank für Dein Feedback.
Es sollte ganz sicher nicht als meckern verstanden werden, sondern als freundlicher Hinweis für zukünftige Eintragungen dieser Art. 
Das Wiki rät von dieser Art der Datenanpassungen ab und zeigt einen Lösungsweg auf, wie man es zeitlich aussteuern kann, damit es maschinenlesbar ist. Verstehe es bitte als Verbesserungsvorschlag und gleichzeitig als Erleichterung, weil die Änderungen dann nicht nachverfolgt werden müssen. ;-)

Selbstverständlich hätte ich die Daten noch angepasst. Es ist eine wichtige Verbindungsstraße in unserer Gegend und diese ist seit dem gestrigen Mittag wieder frei.

Selbstverständlich wird OSM nicht für "manche Router" optimiert. Aber seien wir doch so gut, dass es auch die Kolleginnen und Kollegen, die Zeit und Herzblut in solche Projekte stecken, nicht zusätzlich schwer gemacht wird.
Danke für Dein Verständnis!
Frans S (2022-05-17 13:27:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Please read the instructions first.
Use the Maxar premium Imagery and that the mappings align with Maxar P !
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119859680
söm4324 (2023-10-12 09:38:39+00:00): Hallo map per, bzgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/528335950 :
building:part ohne umgebendes building=* funktioniert nicht. Beides gehört zusammen.

Ist das vielleicht ein unterirdisches Gebäude? Oder wurde es tatsächlich komplett abgerissen? Auf keinem Luftbild ist nämlich ein Gebäude sichtbar.
map per (2023-10-12 12:56:13+00:00): Ja, der Keller ist unterirdisch
söm4324 (2023-10-12 14:35:31+00:00): Ok, unterirdische Gebäude zu erfassen ist eigentlich unüblich und macht Mehraufwand. Ich hab nun das building:part entfernt und das Gebäude unter die Erde verlegt. Müsste soweit passen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142482749
Patr1k_P (2022-04-21 14:17:04+00:00): where did that title come from? It's not a Slovak name

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7598314423

Hungarian names do not belong in "name"

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9674242332
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9674242331
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9674242330
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9674242333
LittlePebble (2022-04-25 22:08:27+00:00): Just for your information, I got these from old maps. From different sources ranging from the 1800s to  around the middle of the 20th century.
LaniusCollurio (2022-04-20 08:33:08+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro di questa modifica? perchè dallo stradario del comune di zubiena mi risulta che le strade dei casali non abbiano nome e che quindi gli indirizzi siano da classificare come place senza indicare un name per le highway
ivanbranco (2022-04-20 08:40:02+00:00): Sono sicuro, ho mappato la ground truth: c'è un cartello con scritto "Via Casale Costa", in ogni caso non ho toccato gli indirizzi che rimangono con l'addr:place.
LaniusCollurio (2022-04-20 10:01:08+00:00): Ottimo, chissa se gli altri casali hanno situazioni simili...
kubahahaha (2023-10-02 18:27:34+00:00): Skąd jest ta nazwa? Nie widzę jej w Państwowym Rejestrze Nazw Geograficznych, a Krajowy to podejrzewam pomyłka w nazwie (miało być państwowy)?
Gdzie mogę znaleźć tą nazwę w jakimś oficjalnym rejestrze?
SamosaBelz (2023-10-02 18:33:39+00:00): Tę nazwę wprowadził użytkownik bmichall w zestawie zmian nr 114341195. Jak masz uwagi do tej nieoficjalnej nazwy to się możesz spytać użytkownika bmichall.
A67-A67 (2022-04-18 14:03:53+00:00): Please don't change the speed limit without a proper argumentation.

You're referring to a section that says that the correct speed limit on on-ramps without explicit speed limit signs is 130 km/h, but you're changing the speed limit to 100 km/h.