piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DeFra85 (2022-08-25 10:56:38+00:00): Ah okay.
Frage ich mal bei dem Ersteller des Note nach.
user_2066394 (2022-08-23 23:47:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125186363
NieWnen (2022-09-14 13:01:32+00:00): Wycofane.
InsertUser (2022-08-24 07:53:13+00:00): Didn't mean for these to end up in the same changeset. Sorry about that.
Patchi (2022-08-24 05:28:32+00:00): Bonjour Guill3154,

Je me demande pourquoi la ligne de TER Provence-Alpes-Cote-d'Azur de Marseille à Vintimille a été modifiée dans ce groupe de modifications. Que je sache il s’agissait bien du réseau 'TER Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur' et pas 'TER Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes' et si cette ligne relie Marseille à Vintimille (par Nice) pourquoi faire un "détour" par Lyon et Dijon? Cela n'a que peu de sens. Serait-ce une erreur de manipulation ?

Bonne continuation,

Patchi.
aixbrick (2022-08-28 14:09:14+00:00): Hallo,
nicht jede Route bekommt die Rolle "connection". Nur Routen, die ein anderes Netzwerk verbinden, siehe dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_Node_Network_Tagging#(C)_Network_tagging.
Bitte korrigiere das.
Gruß
Head (2022-08-28 20:19:30+00:00): Ich habe versucht, das so einzutragen wie hier beschrieben:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:route%3Dbicycle#Verbindungen_im_Fahrradknotenpunktnetzwerk,_die_nicht_an_nummerierten_Knoten_enden
Head (2022-08-28 20:30:03+00:00): Nein, du hast Recht, ich habe role=connection an jede Route drangeschrieben. Das war nicht durchdacht von mir. Ich versuche das zu korrigieren.

Die beiden Wiki-Seiten widersprechen sich aber anscheinend. Sollen unnummerierte "Abkürzungen" jetzt role=connection kriegen oder nur Routen, die mit anderen Knotenpunktnetzwerken verbinden?
aixbrick (2022-08-29 10:18:59+00:00): Danke fürs Ändern.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_Node_Network_Tagging#(B)_Route_tagging nennt state=connection nur als Attribut bei einer Route, die z.B. einen POI ans Netzwerk anbindet. Dass man auch role=connection beim Netzwerk setzen soll, steht offenbar tatsächlich nur auf der deutschen Seite. Ich würde role=connection nur bei Routen setzen, die Verbindungen zu anderen Netzwerken haben.
Persönlich finde ich ohnehin, dass es zu viele Wiki-Seiten gibt, die sich mit Fahrrad(routen)-Tagging befassen. Dadurch sind Widersprüche schon vorprogrammiert.
Mannivu (2022-08-24 11:13:43+00:00): Una mappa non è responsabile degli illeciti dei cittadini. Modificare la mappa a proprio piacimento (o, peggio, per le proprie presunte esigenze) arreca danni alla mappa stessa e ai suoi fruitori. Se il problema è l'ingresso vietato da parte di personale autorizzato, prego dotarsi di barriere ad hoc.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125290606
aceman444 (2022-08-23 22:22:30+00:00): The zone and side streets allow only vehicles of residents and property owners, delivery at 9:00-10:00 and vehicles with special permission of the city.
These is an additional sign saying 09:00-19:00 which I don't understand what it means. Do the restrictions and the pedestrian zone only apply in this time interval?
Piskvor (2022-08-24 08:25:23+00:00): IIRC the restriction is lifted at night, but I haven't been there recently. Do you have a photo?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125290968
aceman444 (2022-08-24 22:02:21+00:00): Mel jsem foto, ale uz jsem ho vymazal. Ale znacka vypadala nasledovne: Znak pesi zony, pod ni 3 vyjimky (rezidenti, zasobovani, povoleni mesta) a pod vsim tim dodatkova tabule 09:00-19:00. Znaci to, ze po 19:00 to uz neni ani pesi zona? To by se znacilo v OSM dost spatne :)
SekeRob (2022-08-28 17:40:00+00:00): Finally someone did the deed.  looks a lot cleaner now in QA.
ovruni (2022-08-24 00:33:18+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado un edificio con varias puntas, el cual no existe, por lo que lo he retirado. De la misma forma he notado que se han retirado algunas esquinas de algunos edificios cuadrados dejándolos triangulares, por lo que he restaurado las geometrías de los edificios.
Saludos
treestryder (2024-03-12 01:53:31+00:00): Found this a year later. 
See the Michigan Wiki page for how we tag multi-use paths. When in doubt highway=path.  Footway means foot=designated, as in, only for foot traffic. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Common_Tagging_Schemes
Keegs (2024-03-13 00:34:44+00:00): My bad thanks for the info!
Warin61 (2022-08-27 01:31:19+00:00): Hi,
If this is a club .. then what is its name? Might have been better left as amenity=social_facility and just add building=yes?
Diacritic (2022-08-27 01:37:46+00:00): Hey Warin,

I had intended to go there this week to survey the building again, but I had run out of time.

I suspect it may be a social facility or social club.
clay_c (2023-03-23 20:34:22+00:00): Hi 54324288,

How come the Raritan Valley Line was changed to usage=main here? This line dead-ends in High Bridge, and it only carries suburban passenger trains and local freight trains. Shouldn't it have remained usage=branch?

-Clay
54324288 (2023-03-23 21:02:47+00:00): Clay,

May you clarify the technical qualifications for a line to be main vs branch? From what I know, this was the CNJ mainline from the mid 19th century through to ~1976, then the mainline of Conrail's CNJ division until 1983, when NJTransit purchased the line, where it was renamed the Raritan Valley Line. What did the line lose for it to become a branch, rather than stay a mainline?
clay_c (2023-03-23 21:40:40+00:00): What this line 'lost' was the track west of High Bridge, severing that end of the old main line and turning it into a branch. It may have been a main line in its heyday, but it no longer performs that function.

On OSM, we classify main tracks into usage=main, usage=branch or usage=industrial based on their relationship to the broader railway network. usage=main supports mostly through trains (e.g. yard-to-yard freight trains or intercity trains that skip many stops), and usage=branch only supports local trains (e.g. suburban passenger trains or freight trains that deliver to customers along the line).

There are usage=main lines out there in the US that dead-end, but in most cases that means there's a sizeable freight yard or intermodal port facilities ready to handle all the through trains. High Bridge is a suburban town—I wouldn't expect it to be a destination for through trains.
54324288 (2023-03-25 21:40:59+00:00): Would you agree then that if the line were to be reactivated to Allentown or Easton as per the Amtrak master plan that the line would be considered usage:main?
54324288 (2023-03-25 21:50:43+00:00): Moreover, there are of course other lines that don't strictly fit into this destination. LIC <-> Greenport was once the LIRR mainline, but nowadays would be more likely described as usage:branch. LIC<-> Montauk has more of a case as an intercity line but suffers from the same ambiguity.
clay_c (2023-03-26 00:58:58+00:00): It's true, the distinction between usage=main and usage=branch isn't clear and can sometimes be subjective. Long Island is a case of terminal topography, so it makes sense that a main line might dead-end on the eastern tip of the island. But if you look a map that renders usage=*, like OpenRailwayMap, the Raritan Valley Line is overshadowed by the Lehigh Line which still forms a connective mainline.

I do agree that usage=main may be appropriate if and when the line gets reactivated to Easton/Allentown. Until then, though, it looks out-of-place in relation to other tracks with usage=main.
mariotomo (2022-10-02 19:44:56+00:00): hola Carlos Peterson, gracias por evidenciarlo. no lo hice yo en función de invitación a la gente del lugar, también de encargarse de la revisión. me alegro ver tu revisión.
nevw (2022-08-24 06:09:58+00:00): Hi
Syntax is important for the osm database.
addr:suburb=west footscray
should be West Footscray
ie the name should begin with uppercase letters.
nevw (2022-08-24 13:04:56+00:00): Correction: 
I should have said case instead of syntax.
I guess it is not really important but more of a convention to use uppercase for names.
nevw (2022-08-24 13:10:09+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
nevw (2022-08-27 07:12:04+00:00): I have corrected the suburb case.

Also, could you check #24 Soudan Rd as I expect the large building may be a duplex with one side being #22 and the two smaller buildings nearer the roadway are garages for their cars. 
If I don't hear back, I might just change it, but are you able to check?
nevw (2022-09-01 02:44:04+00:00): I had a sneak peek on g and seems to be as mapped and likely units and all housenumber 24
Joseph R P (2022-08-28 04:13:49+00:00): Please do not leave blank changeset comments, instead describe what changes you are making, it's helpful to other users.
user_13006008 (2022-09-05 00:27:08+00:00): Ku juga lagi ngerjain project ini kebetulan (pemetaan rute angkot)...

https://twitter.com/rtnF14/status/1565010785977647104?s=20&t=ZeoOOh3fElHgEz2jxX-8Eg
mueschel (2022-09-08 10:11:05+00:00): Hallo,
sind LfDS und SLfD wirklich zwei unterschiedliche Namen, oder ein Tippfehler?
skquinn (2022-08-24 02:28:00+00:00): 3100 address came from note 3328656
lonnez (2023-06-18 17:15:22+00:00): Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. However, please do not add people's personal information to their houses.
TrevorAlan (2022-08-24 04:17:19+00:00): Not arguing, but you've made a lot of edits to random streets on Peterson marking them as "private". Is this the correct way? Since they are already behind gates I assume this is to correct for navigation purposes. Do they ALL need to be marked as "private" and would that not mess with navigation while on base?
Grover_S (2022-08-24 15:37:33+00:00): Hmm...was trying to go for accuracy since it is a closed military base requiring authorization to enter. Happy to modify if there is a more appropriate way to reflect that limited access.
TrevorAlan (2022-08-24 16:14:50+00:00): I looked into it, you may be correct. I was concerned about affecting navigation on base for those app that use OSM, but looks like that shouldn't bother. 

Thanks for your time!
Allison P (2022-08-24 17:07:31+00:00): Places on military bases are usually tagged access=no, not access=private. Essentially indicates the difference between "sued by private citizen/corporation for trespassing" vs "arrested/shot by government for trespassing".
TrevorAlan (2022-08-24 17:13:49+00:00): All the bases I edit on are either yes or private it looks. These aren't top secret restricted installations, they are open to residents and dependants, retirees, and also civilians contractors who work on the base. Not to mention anyone who has a pass from a sponsor. 

So I don't think "no" would apply since this is not a military "facility"? It's a base with 3rd party housing development, golf course, museum, etc etc.
Grover_S (2022-08-24 18:19:41+00:00): Yeah - Trevor's explanation is what I was thinking when making "private" versus "no". I want to make sure I'm on solid ground before going through the other local military facilities. Some like the US Air Force Academy are currently open to the public so more accurately coded "permissive". So I want to make sure I'm reflecting those real distinctions when coding them. 

Consistency does matter, so I'll take a look at a larger sample of bases similar to Peterson SFB to see how they are handled. If there is a clearly consistent approach, I'll just follow that lead. If it's not consistent like Trevor saw, maybe the community should have a larger discussion on it. 

Many thanks for the inputs, guys!!
woodpeck (2022-08-24 22:07:08+00:00): The area of this changeset is a jumble of erroneous multi-lane highways. This needs to be repaired. Is this something that you can do yourself? Otherwise we might have to revert your recent lane edits.
woodpeck (2022-08-25 08:28:46+00:00): It appears that it is fixed now, and it was only a slow rendering issue. Sorry.
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-22 09:12:27+00:00): I agree with the note you added to the railways:

"per OSM guidance, abandoned railways should only be mapped where there is visible evidence of its former route. Consider deleting at least parts of this feature."

Tired of trying to map around them when adding buildings, roadways and other features that I usually just skip over areas with these railway headaches.  Would be wise to remove at least the segments that are definitely gone.
MxxCon (2022-08-24 04:30:19+00:00): Hello.
When mapping crosswalks, please don't forget to connect crosswalk to the relevant road. :)
Also, crosswalks controlled by traffic lights should be tagged as crossing=traffic_signals
While crossing=marked is intended for "STOP" crosswalks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125295265
punkpenguinprincess333 (2022-08-24 13:37:21+00:00): @mxxCon thank you ! Very informative. I'll make sure to reflect that.
highflyer74 (2022-08-24 10:03:06+00:00): Moin!

Hier wurde ein Node um ca 1,5 km durch die Landschaft gezogen (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125295913). Ich nehme an, dass das aus Versehen geschah und habe es repariert :-)

Gruss aus HB!
Hb- (2022-08-24 10:24:59+00:00): Besten Dank.
nevw (2022-08-24 06:19:01+00:00): Hi
You have accidentally added a whole city block as a building=house in this changeset
nevw (2022-08-24 06:22:23+00:00): I have deleted it now.
mapper175 (2022-08-24 13:46:27+00:00): What was your source for removing the buildings here?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125297072
kartler175 (2022-08-29 09:12:29+00:00): Bitte sauberer zeichnen, sonst können die Flächen nicht gerendert werden
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.52116&lat=48.18347&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=intersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cways
Dodko (2022-12-06 17:06:45+00:00): Pálenica je
craft=distillery
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:craft%3Ddistillery
archie (2022-08-24 06:36:49+00:00): Hej, du har taggat om HELA den här vägen om från path till unclassified (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51014600). Men det är väl inte korrekt.
(postnord)blåapågar (2022-08-24 06:44:14+00:00): Så nu är det fixat.
dieterdreist (2022-09-16 08:29:37+00:00): Hi Luca, I just noticed you added a hiking trail based on the geoportal, but you totally missed to integrate it with the existing data. At some place, the path (IMHO it could be a track, based on the shape and amount of traffic on Strava) you added, crosses an existing track without connection (your editor should have warned you about this), and at another place, the path passes at 2 meters a track, without a connection, this is very, very unlikely. Please be aware that one cannot simply take the data from the Regione and import it without integration.
Thank you,
Martin
dieterdreist (2022-09-16 08:52:22+00:00): Altre due cose: le highway non dovrebbero praticamente mai essere conesse con i landuse (foreste ecc.) e tantomeno con i confini amministrativi. Non devi fissare i problemi di questo edit perché l'ho già fatto (ti scrivo solo per spiegare cosa ho notato).
Un altro tema ancora sono le restrizioni di accesso sulla ex strada militare. Ho cambiato "motor_vehicle=permit" in motor_vehicle=private, perché "permit" significa che si tratta di una formalità (è necessario un permesso/una registrazione, ma tutti lo possono ottenere senza problemi, è una formalità), contrario a "private" il che significa che il permesso non è generalmente ottenibile. Spero di aver colto bene la situazione di questa strada.
Saluti,
Martin
DP24PH (2022-10-04 10:08:13+00:00): Yikes! You may have missed the changeset comment. Kindly state here in this discussion your intended changeset comment.


DP24
AndreyGeograf (2022-08-24 10:40:32+00:00): Вот ты конечно маладец, сильно разошёлся. Я могу закрыть глаза на то что ты перенёс некоторые названия в description. 

Но зачем надо было лепить тег студенческое общежитие на рабоче-семейное общежитие? Это изменение надо откатить.

Площадь Кирова 'leisure park' - это была стартовая правка 8-ми летней давности, её давно надо было исправить. Когда делал мультиполигон история не сохранилась. Я думал изменить на пешеходную зону, а площадь обозначить точкой с названием.

Занимайся ка ты лучше Масквой, не лезь в Россию.
literan (2022-08-24 10:50:46+00:00): я могу ответить на твои вопросы, если ты извинишься за хамство и не будешь допускать это в будущем
AndreyGeograf (2022-08-24 11:02:54+00:00): "...OSM - крайне “мужской” проект, закрываю глаза на некоторую грубость, однако не приемлю открытого хамства и оскорблений..." 

я не перешёл границ дозволеного, всё в пределах "мягкой грубости", даже правильнее "мягкого подкола". 

А в тебе сейчас говорит обида, так как я не собираюсь тебе подчиняться.
hanchao (2022-08-25 08:08:46+00:00): 每栋楼应该单独画，而不是画一个包住所以楼
eggie (2022-08-24 07:53:36+00:00): Hoi..
Tip:

Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway=yes ... Is dat hier het geval?
Dan toevoegen..
oneway:bicycle=no .....
En evt ook voor moped en mofa ivt..
Groet
Eggie
Andreetje74 (2022-08-24 08:21:43+00:00): done :)
eggie (2022-08-24 08:24:59+00:00): Top!
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-05 06:54:49+00:00): Ein HW=cycleway mit bicycle=no? Wird ja immer wilder.... 😆
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/715377489
IgorSKiselev (2022-09-15 18:49:05+00:00): That change is incorrect. That change add private access to all roads in Questa village. Most of this road are public roads served by Mountain House CDS, same as most other roads in the Mountain House
anilkgba (2022-09-16 08:24:51+00:00): Hi, 

Thank you for reviewing my changeset. I have added the private access tag to the road segments based on the "Private property" street sign board present in the Bing street-side overlays (link: https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=37.785964~-121.551866&lvl=17&dir=181.007&style=x&v=2&sV=1). I appreciate the latest ground-level information provided, and based on your suggestion I have removed the "Private access" added to these roads.

Thank you again for sharing your valuable inputs. I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
anilkgba
user_2066394 (2022-08-24 09:44:13+00:00): Wie heisst das Restaurant?
haderson (2022-08-24 09:58:26+00:00): Das ist kein Restaurant und auch kein Schnellimbiss, in diesem Bereich des Gebäudes ist unsere Patientenkantine. Also keine Info was öffentlich gemacht werden muss da es zu Fehlinformationen führen kann.
user_2066394 (2022-08-24 10:43:34+00:00): Für die Patienten aber an sich kein ganz unwichtiger Ort?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:fast_food%3Dcafeteria
Unbeatable101 (2022-08-30 18:56:24+00:00): Please do not use the description tag for advertising
Syl (2022-08-28 19:44:09+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez mis que le bassin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050127904 est une piscine. Ça ne semble pourtant pas être le cas : https://www.angemichel.com/attraction/bateaux-tamponneurs/
user_6110846 (2022-08-24 07:47:30+00:00): С ПРАЗДНИКОМ НЕЗАВИСИМОСТИ УКРАИНЬІ
joshjryan (2022-08-25 15:16:51+00:00): @Vika_Nosovich I had intentionally removed that section of road (changeset 124945536). It has been dug up and permanently removed as part of the project widening I-25.
https://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2020/07/01/interstate-25-frontage-road-fort-collins-close-permanently/5352334002/
Vika_Nosovich (2022-08-26 05:03:37+00:00): Hello joshjryan! Thank you for your comment and link. I fixed my mistake.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125386448#map=15/40.5738/-104.9988
Mannivu (2022-08-24 11:25:46+00:00): Questo è un vandalismo bello e buono ed è stato annullato
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125301855
marc__marc (2022-08-25 18:18:22+00:00): Bonjour,
par source "vu,armchair", voulez vous dire vu sur les image sat ? si oui cela se renseigne souvent avec aerial imagery ?
le nom de l'image est parfois renseignée avec imagery_used sur le changeset, cela permet de la retrouver.
par ex dans ce cas-ci, la modification de l'étendue de la zone boisée me parait étrange si je regarde la BDOrtho : l'ancienne étendue correspondait à cet imagerie sat
Cordialement,
Marc
Ropino (2022-09-06 19:27:22+00:00): Hi,
please check/correct:
"oneway=منوچهری ۲"
It looks like a name...
thx in advance
Mannivu (2022-08-24 12:51:22+00:00): Quindi quando dite "Come previsto dalle leggi italiane, preghiamo attenersi alle risultanze catastali ed alle proprietà private." a quali leggi italiane vi riferite?
Sanniu (2026-03-01 15:01:04+00:00): אפיקי נחל or אפיקי נחל?
kepivar (2022-08-24 11:30:37+00:00): Reverting your own vandalism. Good!
aceman444 (2022-12-11 21:04:46+00:00): Why are you damaging bus platforms here? E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127500319 you removed the surface and changed highway=platform to public_transport=platform which is a questionable conversion and second it duplicates the platform already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1411068765 .

Your changes are not based on Bing Maps Aerial as you claim, just blindly converting objects that iD editor suggests to you, but you do not understand what you are doing. As a newcomer to OSM, stop with these changes immediately and revert all these changes, they are useless.
aceman444 (2022-12-11 21:05:58+00:00): Also never do mass automated changes on such large regions of the world.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-08-28 17:39:03+00:00): Ciao. Gli attraversamenti pedonali non vanno inseriti con highway=crossing + crossing=unmarked se sono segnati. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125303537
mikki65 (2022-08-28 20:26:03+00:00): ok
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125303537
Protoxenus (2022-11-16 20:53:15+00:00): Hallo, 
du hast in Rostock zahlreiche Bushaltestellen "hinzugefügt", obwohl diese schon kartiert waren. Ein Prinzip von OSM ist, dass Dinge nur ein mal in die DB eingetragen werden. Die Bushaltestellen sind lt. aktuell am meisten in DE verwendentem Schema als Knoten auf der Fahrbahn (stop_position) und Haltestellenmast (das , was du gemacht hast)  ODER der Bussteig als Fläche gemappt. 
Du musst nicht zusätzlich zu dem Bussteig den Haltestellenmast hinzufügen. Resultat deiner Arbeit: Auf der Standard-Karte gibt es für eine Haltestelle zwei Symbole. Völlig überflüssig. Da werden wahrscheinlich (so wie es schon mal passiert ist), Leute auftauchen: Hier gibt es nur eine Haltestelle, nicht zwei!!! Es wäre sinnvoll gewesen, die DHID (keine Ahnung, wofür die nützlich ist) an den Bussteig zu schreiben.
Gruß Protoxenus
kvaLKRosJJ (2022-11-18 09:01:10+00:00): Hallo,
entschuldigung, das war natürlich nicht beabsichtigt, ich werde Anfang nächste Woche die Fehler berichtigen und die DHID an die Bussteige schreiben.
Beste Grüße….
Protoxenus (2025-01-07 19:56:01+00:00): Die nächste Woche ist bei dir wohl noch nicht um? Es existieren immer noch Doppelungen in der Datenbank. 
Ehrlich mal, das ist hier kein Spiel, auch wenn manchen irgendwelche Punkte sammeln.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-27 11:07:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125438483 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal data in western Ukraine
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
jcr83 (2022-10-29 20:12:22+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez ajouté un passage à gué :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/293912958
Êtes-vous certain de cela ? Je pense plutôt à un pont ou une buse.
aceman444 (2026-05-05 22:40:17+00:00): Hi, why are you removing the name=HU,SK tags from the country border? Most of the segments along the Slovakia/Hungary border still have it, only the segments you damaged are now missing it.