piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-08-01 06:47:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 88804557, 88803494, 88807545, 88805107, 88806072, 88803983, 88806646, 88807097, 88804272 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Vermont building imports reported to DWG.  See discussions in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75339551 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75326336 .
Adamant1 (2020-06-17 03:31:24+00:00): Hi there. It looks like some of these buildings where imported over already existing ones. Do you plan to do any QA at some point to get rid of the duplicates?
Adamant1 (2020-06-17 03:32:29+00:00): I ask because I know it's been 9 months since you did the import, but there should still be some cleanup of the duplicates.
raushiferum (2020-07-17 11:38:28+00:00): If deizenov refuses to answer I think this changeset should be reverted.
Adamant1 (2020-07-18 09:39:14+00:00): I messaged the DWG about it. Hopefully they will just revert it. I don't think it would be practical to fix the problem manually anyway. Since from what I've seen it looks like a lot of buildings over a pretty wide area were duplicated. Plus, I couldn't find anywhere that they discussed it either (although I could have just missed it). So it's better to just revert the whole thing IMO.
SomeoneElse (2020-07-21 23:11:45+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the DWG here.  I'll wait a few days in case anyone volunteers to fix up the problems; if not I'll revert these imports.
Best Regards,
Andy
PT-53 (2019-11-09 15:31:04+00:00): Hallo tobim91,
Du hast an dieser Treppe
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70422349/history
das Merkmal construction=footway ergänzt.
Was ist dort? Eine Treppe oder ein Fußweg und ist dort eine längerfristige Baustelle?
Fragende Grüße
tobim91 (2019-11-13 21:48:19+00:00): Hinter der Treppe ist eine Baustelle weshalb es ab der Treppe gesperrt ist. Wie lange die ist keine Ahnung aber die ist schon ein paar Monate dort.
PT-53 (2019-11-14 08:34:49+00:00): Hallo tobim91, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung:

Wenn an der Treppe selbst gebaut wird und dies länger andauert (mind. 6 Monate) wäre highway=construction + construction=steps die richtige Merkmal-Kombination dafür.
Sollte die Treppe aber nur wegen einer Baustelle "daneben" gesperrt sein, wäre access=no passender. 
highway=steps + construction=footway ist auf jeden Fall falsch

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an und überwachst Du auch das Ende der Baustelle?

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-11-24 11:53:31+00:00): Hallo tobim91,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-05 09:32:37+00:00): Hallo tobim91,
SEs wäre schön, wenn Du Deine Eintragung noch berichtigen würdest.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-16 10:21:32+00:00): Hallo tobim91,
nach dem Du Dich ja leider nicht darum gekümmert hast, habe ich heute die Merkmale berichtigt.
Grüße
TravGW (2019-10-05 20:20:38+00:00): This doesn't look like a park to me. It looks more like a neighborhood with a lot of trees.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-08-01 06:47:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 88804557, 88803494, 88807545, 88805107, 88806072, 88803983, 88806646, 88807097, 88804272 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Vermont building imports reported to DWG.  See discussions in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75339551 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75326336 .
iWowik (2020-01-19 11:17:21+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы картрируете домики, вносите адресную информацию.

Обычно номера домов сложно найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы их берете?
wambacher (2019-10-06 07:08:05+00:00): Hi, by changing the AL2 of the Palestinian Territories to boundary=disputed, you are whiping out the WHOLE territory. That is not acceptable.

contacted DWG.

walter
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-20 09:47:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75948695 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in Palestine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3219 for advice for the user to engage with the wider community before such edits..
eggie (2019-10-05 21:02:46+00:00): Beste mygorcum
Bedoel je nu met "changed one-way for bicycles to no on car-only one way road." dat er géén uitzondering is hier voor fietsers op eenrichting?
Je hebt oneway:bicycle=no (de uitzondering op eenrichting)  dus verwijderd.
Klopt dat met je commentaar?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-05 21:10:21+00:00): Hoe kan het kleine stukje residential nu oneway zijn voor auto's terwijl het dood loopt?
Dan zit je daar toch gevangen? 
Is het stukje fietspad (Kokerjuffer) dat de busbaan passeert naar  werkelijk oneway?  
MVG,
Eggie
mvgorcum (2019-10-05 21:15:59+00:00): mijn bedoeling was dat one-way niet voor fietsers geldt, en dat kleine stukje is zeker niet one-way, echter niet berijkbaar voor autos (wel voor fietsers/wandelaars).

Als ik dat niet goed gedaan heb: excuus!
eggie (2019-10-05 21:31:21+00:00): Oke. geen verwijt overigens. Ik pas even wat aan. Het is niet aangeduid als fietspad dus ik maak er net als de noordkant pedestrian van met bicycle=yes.
De oneway:bicycle=no zet ik even terug.
Dat is juist die uitzondering. 
Er is hier van alles gerommeld door voorgaande mappers incl iemand van de Brandweer zodat het nooit kan routeren. Je moet straks nog maar eens kijken of het klopt.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-05 21:42:20+00:00): Oke. ik heb het weer routeerbaar gemaakt voor tweewielers van moped t/m fiets. Volgens de tagging mogen in het voetgangersgebied die tweewielers aan de noordkant rijden. Of dat echt zo is weet ik niet.
De uitzondering op de eenrichting heb ik teruggezet 
met oneway:bicycle=no en ook voor moped en mofa. (Dat is dus de uitzondering op oneway=yes)
Wellicht kun je het nog even checken. 
De oversteek en het doodlopende stukje heb ik van oneway ontdaan en omgezet in pedestrian aannemende dat het geen residential of fietspad is.
Het zal nu in ieder geval routeren. :) 
Groet,
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-05 21:46:07+00:00): moped en mofa yes nog toegevoegd aan bollard.. ivm routering
mvgorcum (2019-10-05 23:54:24+00:00): Bedankt dat je achter me hebt opgeruimd! Als ik het zo zie klopt het nu perfect. Mocht ik nog wat tegenkomen dan zal ik het aanpassen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-08-01 06:47:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 88804557, 88803494, 88807545, 88805107, 88806072, 88803983, 88806646, 88807097, 88804272 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Vermont building imports reported to DWG.  See discussions in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75339551 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75326336 .
luiswoo (2019-11-15 19:45:17+00:00): В веб редакторе есть такая сложная клавиша Q для выравнивания углов контура. В JOSM с помощью расширения buildings_tools можно делать здания на порядок быстрее и изначально с прямыми углами https://yadi.sk/i/TPzLbOcS3aYw9E
RicoElectrico (2019-11-26 18:06:40+00:00): Hej, nie lepiej by było dać amenity=arts_centre na objezierskim domu kultury? Opierając się na lokalnych wiadomościach taki profil by bardziej pasował. https://oborniki.naszemiasto.pl/tag/otwarcie-domu-kultury-objezierze
m@rio (2019-11-26 21:51:12+00:00): Cześć, pamiętam tę edycję - też miałem wątpliwość co do tagu. Oba te tagi się trochę nakładają. Wybrałem community_centre ze względu na to, że jest to definiowane jako miejsca służące do organizacji lokalnych imprez i uroczystości. Arts_centre kojarzę raczej ze galeriami, wystawami prac. Tu jest trochę mix, więc nie upieram się w tym przypadku! 
Pzdr :)
archie (2019-10-05 20:45:39+00:00): I osm kör man inte med förkortningar. Ändra till Västra resp Östra, tack. Om du vill ha en version med förkortningar tar du: "short_name=Furilden V fågeltorn".
infeeeee (2019-10-07 22:29:06+00:00): Az orvosok nevét biztos, hogy nem operator-ként kéne felsorolni, ide annak kéne kerülni, hogy Ferencvárosi Egészségügyi Szolgáltató Közhasznú Nonprofit Kft, ha tényleg ő a fenntartó. Nem tudom, hova kéne kerülnie a neveknek, erről nincs szó a wikiben
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75327338
grin (2019-10-08 20:08:31+00:00): A házszám után nem kell pont.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75327338
mueschel (2019-10-07 10:53:13+00:00): Hi,
you added these two tags on some nodes:
fuel:diesel:class2=yes
fuel:diesel_class2=yes

Could you change them to use only one spelling? And, could you add them to the list of fuels in the wiki to describe what type of fuel this is precisely?

Thanks
Jan
4004 (2019-10-07 15:46:20+00:00): thanks for spotting the spelling error Jan.
I am wondering whether you might know of a good tag for cold weather diesel? I was mostly going off the EU EN590 and CIS ГОСТ Р 52368-2005 standards, where colder weather diesel varieties are classed into Classes 0-5 by filtration temperature. Or would it be better to go for a simpler generic tag like diesel:winter, or the already used diesel_arctic? Both have somewhat fuzzy definitions
mueschel (2019-10-07 17:48:49+00:00): I'm not used to these special kinds of fuel.
How are they offered? All kinds the whole year through, or does the fuel offered depend on the season?

In the first case, it might make sense to tag the class. In the second case, I'd suggest something more generic. 'diesel_winter' might be fine, maybe diesel_lowtemp (depending on the region you might need it in summer too)
4004 (2019-10-07 18:03:40+00:00): offering depends on the fuel station and time of year in some places. I've looked through the specs, and it looks like there are multiple classes being sold generally branded as winter/arctic diesel, so I decided to specify the class number and document the background on the wiki
VLD062 (2019-10-07 23:09:30+00:00): Hi 58zarali,

Thanks for trying out RapiD! Most of the digitized roads from your changesets look great :) However, we noticed from this and other changesets that some of the roads were disconnected/ incomplete. When tracing highways, ensure you are zoomed in sufficiently. As a starting guide set the scale to about 20 meters, and trace the highway so that your tracing has sufficient points in it to keep it on, or very close to, the road you can see in your satellite imagery. The RapiD editor also comes equipped with a validator which gives warnings about potential errors. While AI is a great assistant that starts us off with the geometry of the roads, the normal rules of OSM still apply and we encourage users to validate things like connections.  Love your continued support of OSM! Let us know if you have any questions. 

Thanks for your time,
Jesspher
kartonage (2019-10-06 01:05:48+00:00): Hallo Jurpel,

du hast hier doppelte Linien für die gleichen Objekte erstellt und Radwege dupliziert. Bitte informiere dich darüber wie sowas zu mappen ist, bevor du flächendeckend irgendwas umsetzt. In der derzeitigen Umsetzung ist es weder sinnvoll noch richtig. Danke.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren
kartonage (2019-10-06 01:15:46+00:00): Allgemein, da mir noch ein paar mehr Sachen aufgefallen sind, wären ein paar mehr Blicke ins Wiki nicht schlecht. Es werden zB nicht Tunnel und Brücke gleichzeitig angesetzt.

Entsprechend wäre es auch immer gut wenn das Changeset-Kommentar nicht nur "Kleinigkeiten" ist, sondernd beschreibender. Danke.
Jurpel (2019-10-06 17:20:30+00:00): Danke für den Tipp.
Ich versuche mich zu verbessern.
MfG
borovac (2023-01-11 13:40:21+00:00): Hi KapaK
While adding the names of the streets according to the MML Background Map I noticed that you added the old street name which is the same as the current name.
But according to the data from the MML Background Map, that street is not called "Mustalahdentie", its name is "Kiurusuontie".
Could you please check these changes of yours further or if you agree I can make the change for name tag.
All best borovac
borovac (2023-01-11 13:42:27+00:00): Hi,
I forgot to put which street my question refers to.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77624843
KapeK (2023-01-11 14:32:49+00:00): A one possible typo is that I have added the old name but I have forgot to change a current name. Mustalahdentie is the real name in town of Noormarkku, but after Pori took possession of Noormarkku, they changed names of many roads.
borovac (2023-01-11 14:38:14+00:00): Can I ask you to enter the names for the whole street since you know the situation on the ground.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-10-05 21:23:49+00:00): Added as an alt_name in Changeset #75328278
maraf24 (2019-10-06 18:13:23+00:00): This changeset should be reverted.
wambacher (2019-10-06 06:51:51+00:00): Hi, by changing the AL2 of the Palestinian Territories to boundary=disputed again, you are whiping out the WHOLE territory and not only a part of the the West Bank. That is not acceptable.

contacted DWG.

walter
OrDal (2019-10-06 07:02:26+00:00): You are crazy, I don't know what to say. Leave me alone. Stop blaming me of all the problems in this area.
I did not changed the "Disputed" tag at all. In this changeset I updated the boundaries of Umm al-Fahm and Maale Iron, which changed also this relation because of way splitted.
OrDal (2019-10-06 07:14:32+00:00): Check out the history of this relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1703814/history

The "disputed" tag was changed by user MrMassari in changeset #75327038.

I politely suggest that you avoid editing wars with other users, especially if you are unfamiliar with the situation on this area (from previous correspondence I realized you were from Germany)
wambacher (2019-10-06 07:14:38+00:00): yes, i did it again. :(
 must have a bad weekend.
informed DWG of my error.
OrDal (2019-10-06 07:32:25+00:00): Mistake Correction: The username is Mr Massri and not MrMassari (my apologies to this user. Massri in Arabic means Egyptian, while Massari means salary)
SomeoneElse (2019-10-20 10:58:16+00:00): Hello OrDal,
Andy from the Data Working Group here.  I've reverted some of Mr Massri's changes in this area, and would be grateful if you can check that I haven't broken any of your relation edits.  14 relations were edited in this changeset - can you check that they still look OK?  Please let me know if there is a problem.  You can email OSM's Data Working Group at data@osmfoundation.org , or just comment here.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
OrDal (2019-10-20 11:23:56+00:00): Hi Andy,
At first glace everything looks Ok. I'll make some further checks to make sure it all Ok.
BTW, I see you have revertedet the relation of the boundary of the Palestinian Territories with the tag "boundary=administrative", but it sould be "boundary=disputed" as it was before. I'll explain why in the following comment.
Regards, Or
OrDal (2019-10-20 11:28:40+00:00): So, heres my explanation why Palestinian Authority relation sould be marked as "boundary=disputed" (copy-pasted from my discussion with mr. walter aka wambacher)

1. Due to the PA’s declaration regarding their demanded border (They seek to reserve the right to declare any area of Palestine as it was during the British Mandate between 1920-1948, as their territory, not only within the Green Line [the former border between Israel and Jordan in the years 1948-1967] and the Jordan river).

2. Due to the non-recognition of Israel of a state called “Palestine”, nor the non-recognition of sovereignty of any other state in the territories where Israel holds the actual control.

3. Due to the lack of actual control of the Palestinian Authority in most areas of the West Bank.

4. Palestinian Authority claim to be “State of Palestine” is not making it a country. They do not have one central government, they do not own an army, they do not have defined borders and do not have full sovereignty over territories inhabited by their population. In addition, they find it difficult to enforce their partial sovereignty in areas where Israel has given them control. They find it difficult to fulfill their obligations to their population and countries in the region, and are mostly busy encouraging their residents to commit suicide rather than improving their quality of life. So sorry, Palestine in not country, hardly an autonomous authority.
SomeoneElse (2019-10-20 12:06:56+00:00): @OrDal - thanks for your notes above.  I'd suggest having the wider discussion at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65676&p=11 or on a list such as the main "talk" list, as people are more likely to see it there.
Best Regards,
Andy
OrDal (2019-10-20 14:01:20+00:00): I think it better having further discussion at users: Israel forum, https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=33 since most of the users who have opinion on this topic found there.

I will open a new discussion there tomorrow, because this evening a holiday will start here in Israel and not all users will be available (so am I :) )

Regards, Or
wambacher (2019-10-20 15:39:39+00:00): No, this is a problem which should be discussed in an established forum or on an international mailing list.

This is not a local problem at all.
OrDal (2019-10-21 16:25:37+00:00): If you wish to open this discussion to be international you should explain why do you think it is an international issue.
As far as I understand the only reason to make it international is to allow you participate, as you are the only user changing the tag "boundary=disputed" in the relation of the Palestinian Territories to "boundary=administrative" (as i see in the history of this relation) while many other users keep it "boundary=disputed".
I think this issue is pure local issue and only users from this area sould participate.
Word besides, a tip from me: I advise Europeans not to interfere with the problems of the Middle East, also in real life, off the internet. Solve your own problems. The culture here is different from yours and you sometimes find it hard to understand.
OrDal (2019-10-21 16:43:10+00:00): (from my conversation with user Mr Massri, I understand that this is not the first time user wambacher reverting his edits)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-21 23:03:52+00:00): @OrDal re "If you wish to open this discussion to be international you should explain why do you think it is an international issue" - one reason is because one side of the argument is that it's an admin level 2 boundary (i.e. in OSM, an international one).  A forum named after one side of that boundary might be perceived as not being independent in the dispute (regardless of whether it is or not).  Another is that that forum is actually relatively low volume, and still another is that it helps to compare the situation in one place in the world with others where there are also disputes.
Finally, I'd suggest that everyone tries not to add any more heat to the conflict. Statements like "Word besides, a tip from me" are at the very least unhelpful.  No-one should be trying to rake over ancient history here.
OrDal (2019-10-21 23:21:25+00:00): @SomeoneElse
-The users:Israel forum is also hosting the Palestinian editors, as Israel and the territories are in fact one geographic unit, plus there's no Palestinian forum.
-Ok, I accept the other reasons, but still don't think that internatinal discussion will solve the issue, because many users who are not living in our area do not really know what the actual situation is (where Israel have actual control and where the PA have actual control etc. [the answer is not like the area mapped in OSM right now]).
- Sorry for not beeing polite, but my "tip" is true. I promise you that the whole Israel-Arab confict was solved long time ago if the Europeans and the Americans was putting their hands out of it.
Mike Baggaley (2020-03-30 20:25:11+00:00): HI, way 471534803 has been tagged as private in this change, but it appears to have the Trans Pennine Trail along it. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
SomeoneElse (2020-03-31 00:00:12+00:00): It looks like that arm of the TPT in OSM https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10528977 was created in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79126829, 3 months after this edit, and the changeset source suggests that it wasn't surveyed.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471534780 is a public footpath going west (I surveyed it 26/12/2018) - it's not 100% clear where it goes from the road but doesn't look like it goes south through the farmyard.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/731992614 I got on the next visit, 28/9/2019.  There's no TPT signage around here.  If I was going to pick a sensible route for the TPT, I'd pick way 731992614. The only TPT signage near here that Ive seen is north of Riccall, though there may be some in Selby.
Best Regards,
Andy
andergrin (2019-10-06 08:53:34+00:00): Вандалити не треба
mavl (2019-10-21 15:06:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76001306 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75627340].
iWowik (2019-10-15 18:28:10+00:00): Приветствую вас в проекте, я вижу, что вы рисуете домики,и даже с адресами.
Иногда адреса не легко найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы их берете?
yoshkarola (2019-10-16 09:57:00+00:00): Добрый день! А какой вам требуется адрес? Просто у меня есть данные не по всему городу
iWowik (2019-10-16 17:47:50+00:00): Мне интересно откуда такие данные.
Вы вносите адреса аж в двух республиках.
yoshkarola (2019-10-17 09:48:20+00:00): Данные предоставляют, те кто работает непосредственно с клиентами. Вношу за второй город т.к. там не нашлось готовых этим заниматься, поэтому если Вам нужны какие-то ещё адреса "огласите весь список пожалуйста" ©
iWowik (2019-10-18 16:50:20+00:00): Остается вопрос, а откуда данные берут те, кто работает непосредственно с клиентами
iWowik (2019-11-23 16:42:51+00:00): Ну если вы представляете какую-то организацию, то тогда вам следует руководству https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Если есть сложности с оригиналом документа, то вот его перевод на русский язык:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Warin61 (2024-04-27 01:09:20+00:00): Hi,
Node: Larry Adler 6854406242 ...
sport=sky ... means what???
ConsEbt (2024-04-27 21:44:26+00:00): Probably skiers. That shop was selling skiing equipment.
Akkurator (2019-10-17 18:39:30+00:00): Hallo OSMchecker,

du hast aus diesem Fußweg einen Pfad ohne nähere Klassifizierung gemacht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26193054/history
Sollte das evtl. ein Fuß/Radweg werden und die entsprechenden tags fehlen noch?

Außerdem hast du dieses Wegstück gelöscht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273469095/history
Das war ein durch Grünstreifen und Parkplatzreihe von der Fahrbahn getrennter Weg. Gibt es den nicht mehr?

Antwort auf beide Fragen wäre nett.

Grüße,
Akkurator
Akkurator (2019-10-18 12:11:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/273469095/history
Bin vorhin dort vorbeigekommen, der gelöschte Weg ist noch da wie eh und je.
Allerdings ist es nur ein Fußweg ohne Beschilderung, also nicht bicyle/foot=designated wie es getaggt war; höchstens =yes wäre angemessen.

Zeichnest Du ihn bitte wieder ein, oder begründest die Löschung?
Akkurator (2019-11-04 17:28:10+00:00): Hallo OSMchecker,
der von dir gelöschte Weg fehlt immer noch in der Karte, aber existiert in der Realität und wird viel genutzt.
Es wäre wirklich nett, wenn du entweder den Weg wiederherstellen oder deine Löschung kurz begründen könntest.
Akkurator (2019-11-09 19:06:17+00:00): Halloho, jemand da?
Akkurator (2019-11-18 18:07:11+00:00): Haaallooo, jemand da?
Akkurator (2019-12-24 11:26:41+00:00): Da sich der Mapper nicht meldet, habe ich die Löschung des Weges rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78815236
Pink Duck (2022-02-18 20:12:24+00:00): The building tag is for the original intent of the building, the current purpose is recommended to be tagged using building:use. It would be ideal if the wiki were followed, but I guess you have your reasons.