piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Constable (2017-12-02 09:07:30+00:00): @freebeer, got it, thanks for the explanation. I do pretty much the same, I mean, I wrote here because I know I've no local knowledge of this particular area and then I tried getting in touch with the author of that edit, (which happened to be iandees) instead of arbitrarily editing/deleting that node.
@iandees, no he is not referring to you, he is talking about a guy who keeps opening useless notes near places named "Kimberly", just search for "Kimberly" on the map and you'll find a ton of notes opened by him.
Just like this one http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=kimberly#map=13/33.7755/-86.8147&layers=N
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-17 13:42:29+00:00): can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3784962 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-03 17:06:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357794831/history

name=Noname is probably wrong here...

Do you think it is better to tag it as noname=yes assuming it has no name, or just remove this tag?

See also http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1JtE
AriannaL (2025-02-08 23:36:45+00:00): Hey there, I'm checking out the school grounds single node tags in North Dakota and found that most of these aren't actually schools nearby and just farmland (i.e. Strasburg School Number 4). Just trying to understand this changeset's import.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-09 04:48:38+00:00): this import imported official data that was in many cases inaccurate or outdated

that Strasburg School Number 4 may be gone (in suhc cases it can be deleted) or placed at town center instead of real location

some places have piles of several nodes each placed at the same location

is there any trace of this school still operating?
iandees (2025-02-09 04:58:59+00:00): Yep, this import happened 16+ years ago. Some of the data added was pulled in from very old topographic maps. If a thing that was added doesn't exist, then feel free to delete it. If it exists somewhere else, please move the point added here. If the thing already exists in OSM, consider merging the GNIS identifier in to the existing OSM data and deleting the imported point.
AriannaL (2025-02-09 14:43:28+00:00): Got it, thanks guys!
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 02:30:28+00:00): Hi MatzeM. Your edit looks awesome, but I suggest you to improve water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/28494839) due crossing with highway. If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143787400). Thank you.
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-05-06 05:29:57+00:00): I just modified the object base on Maxar Premium Imagery
stephankn (2021-05-06 06:10:14+00:00): great. These water features had been created 12 years ago, based on Landsat imagery, which at that point was also a bit older already. Water line might have changed over the years and Maxar imagery provides much higher resolution. Cross-check alignment of imagery against GPS tracks before doing large-scale changes to avoid the need of another round of corrections later.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-02 09:42:49+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/357804424/history has name = Noname that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
That is probably object without name, not object named "Noname". I think that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes would work better here, should it be changed?
iandees (2024-04-02 19:06:51+00:00): Resolved in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149495656
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-09 22:00:45+00:00): Is this import adding mistagged no longer existing schools - according even to source of import? Like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358061082 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-09 22:01:13+00:00): See https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/91
vojtechzaboril (2022-02-03 11:33:21+00:00): Dobrý dne, chápu že se jedná o 13 let starou úpravu, ale chtěl bych se zeptat na toll=yes u této cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28511851
Není to chyba? Díky
V
Petr1868 (2022-02-03 14:25:57+00:00): no pravděpodobně se jednalo o uklepnutí, zrušil jsem.
vojtechzaboril (2022-02-03 14:32:49+00:00): Díky
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-20 04:26:05+00:00): Hi MatzeM. Your edit looks awesome, but there's an issue with water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/28519237) due data doesn’t exist on newest imagery and causing overlap with highway. Would you mind to recheck and fix the issue, please? If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143786790). Thank you.
MKnight (2015-11-01 12:56:58+00:00): what about the names of the nodes ie: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358017616 and so on? 

See http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=17&lat=19.53075&lon=-99.52782&item=2110&level=3&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT for that too
marc__marc (2021-04-04 13:28:51+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/331123557
can you please move the node clubhouse to the correct location ? I guess it's one of the 2 buildings close by but I don't know which one
Regards,
Marc
blackboxlogic (2020-05-11 18:49:55+00:00): 11 years later... But I see your account is still active!

I'm looking at a Dam (node/358228362). Its position (44.0767432, -69.6178236) seems pretty far off when looking at the imagery because it isn't near any water. Those coordinates are different than what I find in GNIS: (44.0760500, -69.6732900). see https://geonames.usgs.gov/apex/f?p=138:3:0::NO:3:P3_FID,P3_TITLE:1774354,Trout%20Brook%20Dam

Another example: A school (node/358230314) which was .7 miles off but I've fixed. See
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/358230314

Do you know how many of the elements imported are geographically inaccurate (maybe I found the only 2 that had problems but the rest is fine and I should ignore it)?

Do you know what caused the problem (bad data source, truncated data during import, typo)?

I'm considering trying to address the issue in Maine and would like to understand the background or any clues you can give me.

Thank you!
iandees (2020-05-11 18:55:13+00:00): Howdy! This came from a GNIS import a looong time ago. Take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/USGS_GNIS#Editing_GNIS_data for suggestions on how to handle fixing it.
heretofore (2021-03-17 19:33:16+00:00): You didn't find the only two suspicious ones. There's a cemetery marked in the middle of a neighborhood that definitely predates the gnis:created tag.
Yury Yatsynovich (2021-06-22 13:51:11+00:00): Looks like many imported POIs from this changeset are problematic. I found misplaces "Downey School" that should be in Westwood, but this changeset mapped it in Norwood...
heretofore (2023-05-18 19:57:23+00:00): Found another one 5 miles away from its real location.
blackboxlogic (2023-05-18 20:12:59+00:00): Is anything from this changeset in the RIGHT location? (not rhetorical, I haven't checked)

We could delete anything created from this changeset which is still at version 1, as long as it's not part of a relation or way. Would that be awful?

Probably a discussion for an import list.
heretofore (2023-05-18 20:24:38+00:00): I've spot checked maybe 6-8 that I thought might be identifiable from satellite. Most have been deleted. Some indeterminate. This church appears to be right across the street from its imported location: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358284478/history
DaveF (2020-06-13 15:17:19+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/181310448
Do you have any current details of this? Is it still on the books?
kevjs1982 (2020-06-15 08:46:15+00:00): Good question, don't recall seeing it on any of the tram stop posters since the new branches of NET were opened, and not seen it on any Broadmarsh area proposals in recent years, last I saw was in the initial proposals for the Nottingham College site but that was dropped.  In the next few months the city should be publishing it's plans for the urban realm improvements around here (funded from Transforming Cities bid which is due to be accepted this week) - if there's no mention in that fair to say it's been abandoned.
Geography Canada (2016-05-29 19:49:22+00:00): Was your source? See here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37353298. Chris had to delete the school.
Horza (2020-03-13 15:04:49+00:00): For anyone coming across this changeset, the source is probably GNIS
iandees (2020-03-13 15:08:44+00:00): Yep, this was a GNIS import. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/USGS_GNIS
Horza (2020-03-13 15:24:02+00:00): "vast swathes of incorrect data still needs to be tracked down and corrected"
Haha. Yeah. 

The article mentions places no longer existing, though also sometimes GNIS just has them in the wrong location and the feature does exist, just anywhere up to a few miles away
mappinglander (2021-08-30 12:00:44+00:00): seems like this import spammed some extra nodes, I guess the quality of the dataset can be considered a bit low.
ZLima12 (2025-11-08 09:56:58+00:00): Hi,

What was your motivation for using highway=living_street for the streets in Delilah Terrace?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28664205

From aerial imagery at least, these look like pretty normal residential streets.
BushmanK (2014-11-02 17:23:32+00:00): Я так понимаю, что http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/67232 можно убить за ненадобностью?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-29 08:26:29+00:00): What should be done with outdated/clearly misplaced objects like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358975095/history at the parking lot?

At this moment I keep deleting them but maybe there is a better solution.
freebeer (2018-05-29 17:36:26+00:00): In this particular case, and knowing it's somewhat controversial, I fed the name as a google text search and the results here indicated where you might have deleted it (as it's no longer trivial to pull up and locate), and that it seems to be active and thriving.
Some results give an address, which is not nearby, but pops into view to the southeast here in Huntsville Alabama.
Panning over that road shows no mapped church, or even likely building.  I presume as the church grew, it moved to a larger site.  I'm not bothering to see what the search results tell me.  I also didn't see if the address I find corresponds to anything  mapped, with often poor address coverage.
So, I'm not doing anything with that bit of wasted time, and I don't know if it is helpful.  At most I might add a note referring to my search, which maybe in years a local mapper can confirm.
tyr_asd (2016-08-31 16:48:18+00:00): Is think there might be a typo in the elevation of the following peak (added by this changeset if I'm not mistaken): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/332019722
Luc Gential (2023-10-03 10:12:07+00:00): Salut, tu as donné l'altitude de 3514 m à l'Aiguille Centrale d'Arves, à égalité avec la Méridionale. D'où tiens-tu cette altitude ? La carte IGN affiche 3513 m pour la Centrale, et 3514 m pour la Méridionale.
sly (2023-10-03 10:27:35+00:00): C'était il y a bien longtemps, loin de mes souvenirs actuels.

Bref, je l'ignore, si plusieurs sources dont wikipedia donne 3513, va pour 3513 !
sly (2023-10-03 11:50:03+00:00): j'ai oublié de préciser : voilà, je l'ai fais
hee243898 (2022-02-25 09:54:43+00:00): There's no actual post office in K-supermarket Runosmäki. Should it be edited to letterbox or parcel locker?
Osmwithspace (2022-06-17 10:44:23+00:00): Hallo fossy,

kannst du zu diesem Hinweis etwas sagen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2931677

Es geht da um die Position des Fischerhofes https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/359619130

Grüße Osmwithspace
GerdP (2015-10-29 18:14:54+00:00): please review node 359828354.
highway=marked_trail
What is this?
sir-mapalot (2015-10-31 00:40:12+00:00): This node is a trailhead for a yellow hiking trail.  This changeset is an import and there was at this time no major tagging scheme for trails, hence the fixme=yes.  I've removed the highway= and other tags and only left a "note" and "fixme" until someone with local knowledge can map the whole trail...
GerdP (2015-10-31 05:28:41+00:00): okay, thanks for the explanation. OSM contains 280 nodes with the tag highway=trailhead, but I guess a note
is better here.
eggie (2019-03-03 23:19:51+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-21 01:34:55+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/315823975/history has FIXME = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
plexi32 (2025-12-23 17:57:46+00:00): this is already 17years old, the fixme is on the end node of the way. Clarification is needed how the way continues (length and exact location). Meanwhile I would also suggest to check the way type here.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-01-07 11:23:16+00:00): I changed fixme to useful one
GerdP (2015-10-17 06:21:27+00:00): the tag highway=neverbuilt is not widely use.
Please join the discussion at
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/how-to-tag-a-highway-that-doesn-t-exist-tp5857111.html
Emilius123 (2022-10-17 20:00:51+00:00): creator of the most funny multipolygon on earth
Magonreal (2023-09-15 10:48:56+00:00): Hallo Mathbau
Du hast hier (vor 13 Jahren) viele Radwege mit name=Radweg R2 erstellt. Das ist wohl nicht ganz richtig vermute ich, da diese Wege einfach Teil der Relation R2 sind.

Z. B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30416444/

Relation:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11951286

Könntest du diese Namen wieder entfernen, oder soll ich das übernehmen?

Oder gibt es einen Grund, warum die Wege diesen Namen haben?
Magonreal (2023-09-15 10:49:52+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1Aw9
eriosw (2023-09-15 11:26:08+00:00): Ja, das ist sicherlich falsch. Bitte ändern.
Lg Erich
marc__marc (2019-04-07 19:15:28+00:00): Hello,
about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/360435268
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/360435266
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/404738792
according to wikipedia, the term would be mounting_block
the most currently used value in osm is amenity=mounting_block
we are talking about it on https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-April/044293.html
Regards,
Marc
SomeoneElse (2018-10-26 23:04:42+00:00): Hello,
There looks to be a problem with the nodes that you've imported in this changeset, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/336149042 .  There are 4 adjacent "villages", and from the imagery it's clear that they are not in fact villages at all.
Where did they come from?  Should they be removed?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2018-10-26 23:05:09+00:00): 324/5000
Hola,
Parece que hay un problema con los nodos que ha importado en este conjunto de cambios, como https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/336149042. Hay 4 "aldeas" adyacentes, y de las imágenes queda claro que no son en realidad aldeas.
¿De dónde vienen? ¿Deben ser removidos?
Atentamente,
Andy
Francisco Farmer (2020-08-14 00:51:23+00:00): I agree there is a problem with the changeset.  Farm or locality identified as village.
Korgi1 (2021-01-02 21:07:44+00:00): They should all be removed, most are junk in the middle of nowhere.
bumpyroad (2022-09-02 04:04:54+00:00): This changeset should be reverted
ASIM as7 (2024-05-02 19:41:05+00:00): evet allowed hate alos Changes right now
ASIM as7 (2024-05-02 19:42:14+00:00): Changes ever not allowde ever not like
utack (2019-07-07 14:19:39+00:00): Hi,  
kann es sein dass an  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30246983/history  
noch ein bicycle=yes dran darf?  
Aktuell ist es Teil einer Radrouter, aber dan access=agricultural nicht für Fahrrad freigegeben.  
VG
Yaron (2019-07-07 14:33:05+00:00): Ja, vermutlich dürfen Fahrräder da lang. Ich glaube mich zu erinnern, dass auch Pferde dürfen. Ich schaue es mir mal an. Danke!
Yaron (2019-09-22 18:27:25+00:00): Da steht ein Schild mit viel Text, das besagt Motorfahrzeuge und Anhänger verboten, Forst- und Landwirtschaft frei. Ich habe jetzt das access= Tag gelöscht und vier Tags (Motor, Hänger, Forst, Landw.) hinzugefügt.
Beste Grüße!
sheldonelectric (2026-04-20 16:24:24+00:00): Hallo, what is the source for the german names?
sheldonelectric (2026-04-20 16:25:26+00:00): And in French?
AiNikolas (2026-04-20 20:59:03+00:00): Hallo.
Greek and German native speaker translating Greek name into German.

Concerning French:
Translation via dictionary

Sincerely
sheldonelectric (2026-04-22 17:49:07+00:00): I understand that the german names fall into this category of constructed names https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Invented_and_real_names
For the French dictionary, is it copyrighted?
AiNikolas (2026-04-22 17:54:55+00:00): Greetings.

A translation is not a construction. Especially when original names as set forth by official rules are translated.

In order to keep discussion at bay: if still doubting delete it. Or correct it, which is preferable in my 1 cent worth view.

I had to look this up in my library.
Unfortunately, I do not have time spared to do so.
Delete it. Or preferably correct it.

I am sorry that I am of no further or additional help.

Sincerely.
sheldonelectric (2026-04-22 18:13:17+00:00): We add the names in Latin characters (found on street signs) as int_name. For this case, I will change the name:** into int_name and leave a comment that it has to be crosschecked with survey.
AiNikolas (2026-04-22 18:29:38+00:00): Thank you
elot360 (2024-03-20 22:31:14+00:00): Czemu zmieniłeś nazwę ulicy Dobrego Urobku, na odcinku od Załęskiej/Dolnej do Brygadzistów, na ulicę "Brygadzistów", jeśli pierwotnie była ustawiona prawidłowa nazwa ulicy?
kreuzschnabel (2017-11-04 08:04:45+00:00): Ist schon etwas her, aber weißt du noch, wo http://osm.org/node/364696668 genau steht? Sicher nicht auf dem Dach des Gebäudes, wo er jetzt ist. 
Den Mast vorher (#2) hab ich etwas nach Norden geschoben, da sieht man den Schatten im Mapbox-Luftbild. Ergibt dann auch nach Süden eine gerade Linie.
Carsten Güse (2017-11-06 19:23:40+00:00): Hallo kreuzschnabel,
die Position war damals grob geschätzt. Ich konnte die richtige Position von Mast #1 auf dem Mapbox-Luftbild jetzt erkennen/erahnen. Jetzt ist die Leitung auch eine gerade Linie. 
Danke für den Hinweis!
kreuzschnabel (2017-11-07 11:53:52+00:00): Ja, manchmal hilft die Erinnerung, wo das Luftbild allein nicht klar ist. Deshalb hab ich gefragt :)
SomeoneElse (2015-04-17 12:48:01+00:00): (adding this comment as a note in case anyone tries to reconcile these nodes in the future)

There's a bit of an offset at least in some areas with these.  For example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/338591136/history which was at http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/53.2556111/-1.0081667 according to this import is actually at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271670229/history , somewhat to the southwest (this direction of offset seems to be common in North Notts).  See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/338601431/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292578549 .  Note that a number of sites that were marked as disused were definitely in operation as of 2014 - I suspect if varies according to the oil price.
utack (2015-09-03 22:47:58+00:00): Relation 38.897 komplett als landuse=farm zu bezeichnen finde ich etwas größzügig.
Ich würde da mal das Fußballfeld und den Gasthof Wörnbrunn rausnehmen falls genehmigt?
ToniE (2015-09-04 09:18:29+00:00): Da hast du Recht. Da kann man einiges optimieren. Da gibt's ein paar landuse=meadow (eingezäunter Bereich?), landuse=grass (restliche Grasflächen?), landuse=residential (Gasthof + Sportplätze + Hausnummern 3+4?), landuse=farmyard (nicht eingezeichnete Häuser rechts vom Gasthof?), die Bänke rechts oben scheinen mir weit vom Fußweg entfernt ( IIRC stehen die direkt am Weg), ...

Zudem ist das kleine landuse=meadow süd-östlich nicht Teil des Multipologons und somit mit Bäumen übermalt (die Regeln des Renderers Mapnik scheinen nach und nach geändert zu werden).

Das jetzige landuse=farm(land) ist 'inner' des Multipolygons "Grünwalder Forst". Könnte kompliziert werden die Änderungen sauber zu mappen.

Gruß,
Toni
ToniE (2015-09-04 09:19:28+00:00): ... "Perlacher Forst" sollte es heißen, nicht "Grünwalder Forst".
utack (2015-09-04 09:20:27+00:00): Ich werde mal hinsehen in zwei Wochen.
Da kommt jetzt wohl auch eine Unterkunft für Flüchtlinge hin, und sonst hat sich auch viel getan. Da ist sicher Potential da (zumal auch die Baustelle am ehemaligen Parkplatz Richtung Grünwald wohl nichtmehr existiert)
utack (2015-09-05 22:33:31+00:00): Hab das jetzt mal etwas aktualisiert. Das Tiergehege mit Zaum hat ungeahnte Ausmaße, aber der Rest stimmt jetzt
ToniE (2015-09-06 13:29:42+00:00): Ich habe im Perlacher Forst mal das Multipolygon korrigiert. Da waren sehr viele landuse=meadow, die nicht als 'inner' im MP waren und somit derzeit mit Wiesen-Farbe aber drübergemalten Bäumen gerendert wurden (gut, da man somit Fehler schneller findet).

Bzgl. Wörnbrunn wir die Sache sehr kompliziert, da hier mehrere 'inner' (farmland, residential, meadow) aneinanderstoßen (gemeinsame Linien haben). Das wird in den nächsten Tagen hier:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=11.55129&lat=48.03933&zoom=16&opacity=0.63&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touching_inner_rings_hull,touching_inner_rings,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags

evtl. als Fehler "Touching inner rings" auftauchen.

Dann werde ich mir die Arbeit machen und das ganze gemäß MP-Regeln aufräumen.
Rahardja (2024-02-26 09:14:26+00:00): Good job, salam [Rahardja](https://modelrumahkayu.com)
fwsmit (2022-07-22 21:11:02+00:00): Weet je nog hoe je bij de naam "Speelnatuur" komt van het grasveldje? Ik heb zelf die naam niet gehoord.
Zie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3278390
Constable (2017-12-19 17:41:22+00:00): Hi, do you mind having a look at this note?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1240757
Thanks!
skyper (2023-01-26 19:37:07+00:00): Hallo Granjow,
diese Änderungen sind schon uralt, aber das Problem ist noch das gleiche. `man_made=communications_tower` bezeichnet Fernseh- und Fernmeldetürme. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/380635845 und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/380716417 sehen eher nach `man_made=mast` aus, siehe auch https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22677. Kannst Du das bitte korrigieren.

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
Granjow (2023-02-04 11:55:56+00:00): Done!
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-08 10:51:29+00:00): Sorry for bothering you about an ancient change - but can you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1196954 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-05-19 11:25:14+00:00): Jakie jest znaczenie tagów teryt:rm i teryt:stan_na?

Czy teryt:stan_na to data aktualizacji użytej bazy TERYT?
Jajcuś (2020-05-19 11:31:33+00:00): Dokładnie tak jest.

A komentujesz zmianę sprzed 11 lat, gdy TERYT był jedną z niewielu dostępnych nam metod ustalenia co gdzie jest – granic gmin i powiatów w OSM jeszcze nie było, TERYT przynajmniej dawał możliwość powiązania miejscowości z gminami, powiatami i województwami. Obecnie to nie jest taki istotne, więc pewnie nikt tych tagów nie aktualizuje, bo po co.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-05-19 13:31:04+00:00): > A komentujesz zmianę sprzed 11 lat

Zauważyłem, więc tym większe dzięki za odpowiedź.

A jakie jest znaczenie tagu teryt:rm? Pamiętasz może?
Jajcuś (2020-05-19 13:57:06+00:00): To jest jedna z kolumn bazy TERYT SIMC. Tu jest jej opis:

http://eteryt.stat.gov.pl/eTeryt/rejestr_teryt/udostepnianie_danych/baza_teryt/uzytkownicy_indywidualni/pobieranie/pliki_pelne_struktury.aspx

Akurat niewiele to na temat tego 'rm' mówi.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-06-18 16:41:10+00:00): Utworzyłem https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:teryt:stan_na by inni nie musieli się zastanawiać https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:teryt:rm - daj znać jeśli jest tam coś błędnego/mylącego
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-11-04 11:27:03+00:00): What is the meaning of id tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33666021 ?