piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Firefishy (2015-07-04 09:45:53+00:00): Thank you for the accessibility info to OpenStreetMap/Wheelmap, any additional appreciated. Happy to answer any questions you have. - Grant
5m4u9 (2015-06-22 00:03:04+00:00): Buena edición. 

No sé cómo va allí, pero acá en Bolivia el Salar de Uyuni (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1769713) es un desierto de sal (natural=desert + desert=salt).

Nos hace falta una definición exacta geológica experta. La forma en la que mapeamos debería ajustarse al tipo de elemento natural mayoritario, hasta ahora estamos por el camino correcto.
cronoser (2015-06-22 09:37:47+00:00): hola, efectivamente, después de subir la edicción estuve pensando que era mejor indicarlo como desierto en lugar de pantano. Procederé a cambiarlo. Gracias por recordarlo.
joost schouppe (2015-06-22 12:45:04+00:00): Vea tambien esta discusion - para mi no es muy muy claro cual es lo mejor... https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/1556/how-do-you-tag-salt-lakes
5m4u9 (2015-06-28 17:09:16+00:00): @joost hace bien la discusión, aunque nos falta un experto de este mundillo. 

Vos mencionas algo cierto, que Uyuni o (Copiasa) estacionalmente se inunda. Para mi la condición inicial debería primar, luego añadir las excepciones: lagos internos, areas extracción sal, estanques evaporación industriales (para crear baterias), etc. 

Ahora que tenemos el contacto y las ganas de contribuir a OSM de la gente de la cuenta Titicaca-Desaguadero-Poopo-Salar vamos a establecer estas características con mayor respaldo técnico-científico.
t2425b (2015-07-06 21:13:58+00:00): Hallo PKautz,

Du hast die B 248 hochgestuft mit der Begründung, dass sie eine Bundesstraße ist. Die Begründung ist durchaus richtig, allerdings sehe ich darin keinen Grund, daraus highway=primary zu machen.

Zitat von http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attributierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland#Einstufung: "Bei der Unterscheidung zwischen den Attributen highway=primary, highway=secondary und highway=tertiary insbesondere sind die Verwaltungsklassen Bundesstraße, Landes-/Staatsstraße und Kreisstraße nur eine Richtschnur!"

Und dieses Zitat von http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Germany/Bundesstra%C3%9Fen bringt es auf den Punkt: "Die Wege, auf denen die Bundesstraße verläuft, werden normalerweise mit highway=primary getaggt. (...) Wenn die Straße nur sehr wenig Verkehrsbedeutung hat, weil sie z. B. parallel zu einer Autobahn verläuft, kann sie auch highway=secondary sein."

Merke dir: Bundesstraße bedeutet nicht gleich highway=primary, Landesstraße bedeutet nicht gleich highway=secondary und Kreisstraße bedeutet nicht gleich highway=tertiary. Ich persönlich finde es schade, dass viele das immer gleichsetzen. Aber ob es nun Bundes-, Landes- oder Kreisstraße ist, kann man ja schon an dem Buchstaben aus dem ref=* ablesen! Also hilf mit, eine realistische Einschätzung der Straßen durchzusetzen.

MfG, t2425b
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-25 19:09:20+00:00): please stop adding numbers after names
literan (2015-06-22 14:14:46+00:00): визовый центр это не посольство и не консульство!!!!! :-№

это office=company. Поправлю.
zimba (2015-06-20 11:29:23+00:00): Hallo,

Bitte keine so generische Namen wie "Feldscheune"/"Scheune" verwenden, nur "richtige" Namen.

lg
Xmypblu (2015-06-21 08:51:34+00:00): если есть возможность собрать адресную информацию и POI - будет совсем хорошо ;)
zimba (2015-06-20 11:34:46+00:00): Hier wurde der neue eingezeichnete Bach mit einer Hochspannungsleitung verbunden, die beruehren sich aber nicht (bereits korrigiert).
utack (2015-09-03 22:50:52+00:00): Glaube die Baustelle Linie 35416368 ist beendet?
utack (2015-09-05 22:30:58+00:00): So halb, man kommt wieder durch aber sie ist noch da.
kbroderick (2015-06-19 21:38:48+00:00): It looks like you left the worse part of the road (which is questionable for travel by normal sedan) as a track; is that correct, and was that your intent? Does that match other local mapping?

(I'm relatively new to the area, have done a fair bit of less-travelled-way mapping back in Vermont, and the question of what qualifies as a road and what qualifies as a track can be a tough one, as even the "passable by normal passenger car" standard varies depending on who's driving the car)
SomeoneElse (2015-06-19 21:50:24+00:00): For info I didn't add a comment on the changeset that caused this problem because (a) my tourist Spanish would struggle and (b) I didn't want to scare a user off by commenting negatively on their first edit.
*Martin* (2015-08-05 07:32:27+00:00): Ahoj  rb11sk

Na znacenie farby turistickych relacii sa pouzivaju relacie. Tieto 2 trasy ktore si nazval "red marking" uz su v relacii https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1229551 ktore farbu aj tvar znacky specifikuju. Preto prosim odstran tagy name="red marking" z oboch ciest. Dakujem.
*Martin* (2015-08-05 07:35:37+00:00): s/turistickych relacii/turistickych tras
PlaneMad (2016-07-04 05:44:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37453089 Are these stairs actually called `Beer Drinkers and Pot Smokers` ?
hofoen (2015-08-26 06:41:46+00:00): I have reverted this CS [CS 33588206], as it inserted a translated copy of the road network of "Krum"... Why did you do this?
stefanct (2017-09-03 16:09:20+00:00): This is not "better" naming - this is just as wrong as before. It's understandable that people get excited when their favorite sport gets some public space to play on but many tags in the area where disc golf is played in Prater are simply wrong as of now, especially the naming tags. The meadow in question is named Sonnenscheinwiese AFAICT for example. This is even pointed out on Putterfly website... please fix these errors after reviewing http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
GerdP (2015-10-30 18:38:03+00:00): please review node 1124475394:
barrier=toll_booth
highway=start
The tag highway=start (or highway=end)
is rarely used.
If I got that right, you want to mark the
place where the toll road starts or end.
I think you should better split the corresponding road at this point and
add toll=yes to one part.
JeSe-MX (2015-06-21 21:12:20+00:00): ¿Qué representan estas lineas?
orson (2015-06-21 21:24:17+00:00): Edit message incorrect. Should be: Garrity and 11th are only divided from Sugar Ave to 5th St
CJ'Snow (2015-06-20 04:47:24+00:00): Added Schools
tyr_asd (2015-06-20 16:04:53+00:00): Wurde die Bushaltestelle tatsächlich auf die andere Seite der Kreuzung verlegt?
orson (2015-06-21 21:26:43+00:00): Commit message incorrect. Should be: Fixed a few validation warnings.
JeSe-MX (2015-06-21 21:19:40+00:00): Buenas tardes.
Para tienditas, se debe poner "shop=convenience", y no "supermarket"

No olvide la fuente "source="
JeSe-MX (2015-06-21 21:22:41+00:00): Una vez que se agregue la línea, hay que especificar qué representa la línea, pues puede ser desde una calle, avenida, autopista, barda, linea eléctrica, etc.
Skippern (2015-06-20 16:12:36+00:00): Bem vindo ao OSM! Talvez ajudar coloque alguns tags/etiquetas para identificar o que voce quer entra no mapa?
Rondom (2015-06-20 06:05:52+00:00): For further explantion see:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31894686
andrzej_aa (2015-08-06 06:20:24+00:00): Wandalizm
XaMi (2015-06-21 19:08:51+00:00): Die Attribute von Weg 271599466 wurden schon einmal aus gutem Grund entfernt: Das Gebäude hat einen Innenhof und wird daher mit einem Multipolygon dargestellt. Daher werden die Attribute, die das Gebäude betreffen, auch an die Relation 3625675 gehangen und nicht an eine äußere (oder innere) Begrenzung,
Und auch hier macht es keinen Sinn, einen Knoten in ein Flächenobjekt zu legen, welches nochmals Attribute enthält, die bereits am umgebenden Objekt (hier die Relation) gesetzt sind.
Beides bereits korrigiert.
eggie (2022-09-08 20:03:10+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen  Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2015-06-24 11:43:25+00:00): I think that something may have gone a bit wrong here - you've changed "Level" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267518166/history to "building:levels".  Given that it's a "highway=path", this seems unlikely.  It's not exactly clear what the original mapper meant, so maybe a changeset comment on the original changeset or a note might be a better way to try and resolve the issue?
GerdP (2015-12-01 14:27:10+00:00): Hi there!
It seems you have added the "National Trail"
3 times at different positions, Also another way was duplicated. Please review 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35685650
I also guess that the trail is much longer ?
unsungNovelty (2015-12-21 10:24:42+00:00): Yes. I have extended the trail as per the satellite imagery. Kindly do correct me if there was something wrong where i have added the data.
Heinz_V (2015-06-21 05:11:49+00:00): Why did you delete the ref-tag of Saradhana?
indigomc (2015-06-21 10:40:16+00:00): Sorry. The village is correctly named Saradhana but the station is Saradhna. So since the first is the more common name, I changed the station to Saradhana, then couldn't find a ref for it, so I deleted it. I've changed it back the way it was.
literan (2015-06-22 14:21:15+00:00): никаким метро там не пахнет - из-за кризиса начало строительства центральной части желтой линии отложено минимум за 2018 год. Коммуникации перекладывают.
sabas88 (2015-06-21 20:54:28+00:00): Why not adding details to the building instead?
trigpoint (2015-06-20 11:30:59+00:00): I have reverted this, you had deleted a park and re-added it less much detail which our volunteers had worked on.
Please remember that this is a live map, and is visible to everyone and is not a private map or a marketing tool.
If you need a customised map you could try http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/
Sanniu (2017-09-04 12:03:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133601461 set to oneway block routing here. This does not look right...
hypothal (2015-06-20 11:38:14+00:00): That was for Asharfilal Kulfi.
Changed the amenity typeto fast fodd, cuisine to burger for McDonalds
yogi_ks (2015-06-22 11:19:45+00:00): Hi hypothal,
I guess the name should be McDonald's instead of Mc'donalds as per their official website - http://www.mcdonaldsindia.com/
fkv (2015-07-11 21:42:57+00:00): Warum hast du hier so viele Flächen gelöscht und neu angelegt? Warum landuse=meadow in landuse=grass umgewandelt? (Das benutzt man doch nur noch für urbane Rasen, siehe Wiki.) Und warum hast du die Flächen aus dem Wald-Multipolygon herausgenommen? (Das führt z.B. dazu, dass in der Wanderreitkarte auch die Wiesen als Wald dargestellt werden.)
GerdP (2015-10-07 19:19:27+00:00): this change produced some invalid
route restrictions. I tried to guess
what was meant near
node 3607052485
Bakuvian (2015-10-07 19:43:38+00:00): Yeah, it is strange... Fixed with changeset 34498175.
GerdP (2015-10-07 19:51:31+00:00): JOSM still reports a lot of errors here.
I am not sure how well iD supports
restrictions. The typical restriction
has a from way, a via node, and a to way.
The from way must end at the via node,
the to way must start at the via node.
Bakuvian (2015-10-07 21:03:51+00:00): Well, I'm not aware about iD having problems with this. Installed the JOSM, how can I see/replicate these errors?
GerdP (2015-10-08 02:29:30+00:00): start JOSM, download the data around this area. Make sure to have the Validation Window (see Windows->Validation Results) open and click on Validation. See also 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator
Bakuvian (2015-10-08 17:50:33+00:00): Oh, this will take some time to fix...
eggie (2019-09-27 13:44:28+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
nurdafur (2020-09-03 19:02:41+00:00): Bei cycleway=opposite sollte für ein korrektes Funktionieren der verschiedenen Navi-Apps immer zusätzlich noch oneway:bicycle=no zugefügt werden.
k1wi (2015-09-20 16:02:32+00:00): destination=* no se indica en el nodo highway=motorway_junction, sino en la vía de la salida highway=motorway_link
RafalR (2015-06-20 16:34:16+00:00): Przy nazwach ulic pomijamy skrót ul.
zarl (2015-10-18 08:35:19+00:00): Hi kartler175, du hast bei der Wiederherstellung der Grenzrelation die VBT (Ost) vergessen, da steckte jetzt eine Lücke drin. Ich fixe das grad mal. Gruss, Carl
SK53 (2021-11-18 13:58:58+00:00): Hi,

Was just looking for "heath" names in Warwickshire (based on Steven Falk's map - https://mobile.twitter.com/StevenFalk1/status/1203423627863085058) and noticed that the end bit of Heath Lane, Brinklow is mapped as unpaved, which is very unusual for highway=unclassified. This Geograph images suggests it is actually asphalted https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/5503798.

Regards,

Jerry aka SK53
GerdP (2015-10-11 12:07:19+00:00): please review, what is this?
StefanB (2015-07-01 08:58:34+00:00): Hi, I have changed the name back to Hrušica, see  http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32326506
plamen (2017-01-05 20:07:38+00:00): There is no tag natural=bush_row, but could be proposed.
maraf24 (2015-06-21 18:35:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336753167
Przecież tam jest mur. Oraz trawnik. I teraz droga idzie po trawniku i przechodzi przez mur.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-27 16:22:07+00:00): Hallo Erno54. Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1252257538 hast du einen Verweis zu Wikipedia bzgl des Naturdenkmals Winterlinde gesetzt. Leider gibt es diesen (anscheinend) nicht mehr. Magst du mal schauen, ob du noch etwas findest und korrigierst es?
Endres Pelka (2015-10-25 01:03:54+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Roger Browne/diary/36175
SK53 (2015-10-25 10:54:48+00:00): I would just like to add that deleting 'dangerous' paths is not an activity of which I approve. Accurately tagging such paths yes, deleting information about something which exists  Working to render paths which are not suitable for the ordinary pedestrian would also be helpful. There is a whole comment thread on this point on Github: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1500.

I see that you are a relatively inexperienced contributor and might not be fully aware of OSM's ethos: if it's verifiable on the ground it can be mapped.

Also consider that roads with cars generally are much more dangerous for pedestrians: would you delete these too!
Andreas Moeller (2015-10-28 11:09:01+00:00): maybe I am unexperienced mapper and maybe there is an OSM ethos. But local people living in tenerife asked me to delete the path because there is NO path and the area is extremely dangerous. So, life is more important for me than such an ethos. I was 1 month ago on Tenerife and in Igueste de San Andres. I validated what the people told me. Note that every year hikers die in the mountains of Tenerife. 

I tried some of the paths in the Anaga mountains. OSM is not always correct and again there are a few really problematic paths. But its OK for not to update OSM.

Game over.
SK53 (2015-10-28 12:29:55+00:00): OSM can never be regarded as wholly reliable: anyone using any map as the sole navigation aid for paths in mountainous country is just asking for trouble. For instance for several years we had a path marked on the Hoernli ridge of the Matterhorn, and people mark Via Ferrata as paths to enable them to appear. Hikers must take responsibility for themselves, and that means informing themselves of local conditions. 

Another example: things marked paths around Diavolezza http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ckc

I would suggest a sensible, albeit not entirely satisfactory, approach would be to add something like "(Perigloso)" after the path name.

The problem with doing what locals want is that often they want things not to be displayed for many reasons other than safety. I can make no judgement about this is this case.
Andreas Moeller (2015-11-01 19:15:46+00:00): I have seen that the path is visible again. The locals mentioned above are not really local. They are German hikers and experts in the region (some of live on Tenerife since 10 or 20 years). They urged me (and I was in the Anaga region last August / September) to remove the path. The simple reason is that there is no path! And the area is really dangerous!
One of the locals mentioned that the reason could be that a geo-cacher tried to find a geo cache at the Semaforo. 
If there is an accident on the path, the OSM path is maybe one of the causations. I would not bear such a risk.
The experts / locals told me that the responsibility question is not easy to answer. If you are an experienced hiker, you are already responsible for the whole group. You are treated as a professional guide and it is recommended to have an insurance. 
Moreover please note that that path in nor far away from the restricted area of "Reserva Natural Integral de Ijuana". The path contributes to the destruction of the "Parque National de Anaga".
BeKri (2015-06-21 12:16:06+00:00): Hallo,
gibt es einen Grund, warum Du die Ampel Knoten: 2139154378 
samt Wegen über die Gleise in den Norden
von Pasing verlegt hast ?
BeKri (2015-06-21 12:17:13+00:00): Hallo,
darf ich fragen, was Dich veranlasst hat
den Wald heraus zu nehmen ?
Xmypblu (2015-06-21 07:30:05+00:00): привет, вопрос - почему так криво обрисовываешь здания? 
Если лень использовать хоткей "s" для создания прямых углов - используй редактор JOSM и плагин http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools
...и здания не должны накладываться друг на друга
Toni73 (2015-06-20 19:00:53+00:00): Demolished in 2014
shura0 (2015-06-22 08:46:29+00:00): Привет.

Леса у нас обозначаются как natural=wood, не надо их менять на forest.
Cat_XF (2015-06-22 10:05:14+00:00): Спасибо. Я только знакомлюсь с интерфейсом :)
shura0 (2015-06-27 13:49:14+00:00): Привет.
Не ставь пожалуйста на тропинки теги типа foot=yes и bicycle=no, эти теги совсем про другое, они означают ЮРИДИЧЕСКУЮ возможность проехать/пройти. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
Я так понимаю, что по тропинкам ездить на велосипеде не запрещено.
Cat_XF (2015-06-29 13:33:46+00:00): Я не ставил ЭТИ теги.
shura0 (2015-06-29 14:10:58+00:00): Ок, я почему-то подумал что это ты их добавил.
Cat_XF (2015-06-29 17:23:38+00:00): Я добавлял новые просеки и тропинки.
Старые просеки кто-то другой неправильно создал, я просто не поправил :)
Xmypblu (2015-06-21 09:24:14+00:00): при проблемах с обозначениями - смотреть тут:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Как_обозначить
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=2094
удачи!
Xmypblu (2015-06-21 09:19:59+00:00): подписывать "болото" и "просека" - ошибка, достаточно поставить нужные теги
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Как_обозначить
Cat_XF (2015-06-21 14:51:06+00:00): я не понял из ссылки как подписывать
названия "просека" - убрал
Xmypblu (2015-06-21 18:22:36+00:00): Что именно необходимо подписать? тег "name" (подписи) используется редко, только для объектов имеющие собственные имена. 
Если необходимо отметить просеку - ставим теги просеки, если отмечаем болота - ставим тег болота + уточняющие теги
Если что-то совсем сложное и нет в примерах - спрашиваем на форуме:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=2094
Cat_XF (2015-06-20 19:51:02+00:00): Часто бываю в этом лесу, дорисовываю что и как
naoliv (2015-07-19 15:38:10+00:00): badoo, não altere a classificação dos locais dessa forma
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2016-07-10 12:48:19+00:00): decimaler i fx bredder (width) skal angives med punktum og ikke komma. dvs fx "width=1.5" og ikke "width=1,5"

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355174662
ToniE (2015-06-21 11:43:44+00:00): Hallo dmo84,

ich denke der Node 573389599 ist auch für foot/bicycle=private, da die Uni BW Neubiberg hier einen Ausweisleser installiert hat. "permissive" würde bedeuten, dass "jeder" ohne weite Kontrolle hier lang kann.

Ich werde das entsprechend ändern.

Viele Grüße,
Toni
RicoElectrico (2015-09-19 20:21:38+00:00): Cześć, mam pytanie: skąd wyrysowałeś budynki? Nie widzę ich ani na Bingu, ani Geoportalu. Rysowanie na oko budynków bez zdjęć lotniczych na pewno nie jest dobrą praktyką - można po prostu dodać sam adres jako punkt i nikomu nie stanie się krzywda ;)
Po drugie: adresy w formie 7A, 7B są niepoprawne! Trzeba albo podzielić budynek (jeśli przecięty jest granicą działek), albo wstawić adresy jako punkty.
Jeśli masz jakieś pytania, pisz śmiało, bo widzę że masz zarówno lokalną wiedzę, jak i zapał ;-)
slawek1990 (2015-09-19 20:48:06+00:00): Budynki wrysowywałem przy pomocy strony kosakowo.e-mapa.net.  Co do punktów adresowych to nie wiedziałem, że są wymagania co do formy.
Tomas_J (2023-07-11 07:25:29+00:00): Ahoj, pre autora sochy pouzivaj sekundarne odkazy - viz.:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:wikipedia
Tomas_J (2023-07-11 07:29:10+00:00): Ahoj, pre osobu, ktoru socha/doska zobrazuje alepo popisuje pouzivaj sekundarne odkazy - viz.:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:wikipedia
Govanus (2015-08-07 19:37:22+00:00): Hi Socks,
I'm confused about the connection of adding node 3105547790 to way 305867452 which was originaly only with Way: 305867453.  The confusion is that you can't reach node 3105547790 from way 305867452 without using Way: 305867453 or a ladder as they are on different floors!  At this site I had begun to include the entrances to flats that have front doors built above each other so under the indoor convension it needs stacked nodeing.  There's a lot of similar stcked nodeing for verticaly seperated entrances at the the CAB has this edit damaged the flooring of nodes and ways?
Socks (2015-08-13 19:26:32+00:00): If it's wrong, it probably wasn't intentional - as the changeset comment says I was correcting poor spelling and standardising tags to use established schemes. The problem with much of this "micromapping" is that it's very confusing when the next person comes to edit it - I don't really have a solution to this. Personally, I think it's a shame so much time/effort is being put into mapping interior levels and footpath areas when there are parts of the city without basic building outlines and address information, but family commitments mean I don't really have time to improve things myself with actually useful stuff at the moment.
Govanus (2015-08-13 20:47:32+00:00): thank you for the reply.
I think I sufer time contraints a lot which I think makes me more ancious when I spend so much effort on getting details right for people to make errors not because I'm wrong in the detail but they make asumption on limmited facts oftern its not so common but used to have at one time someone tailgating all my work that drove me crazy in the endas you could tell they didn't even check arial maps in editors by what they did but so as not too come over negitive espcially as a bell is tolling here and I'll be cut off midstream before the better part.

I like to be a detail-merchent mainnly because of the size of maps I make for the data.  ie entrance to building maps and footways for pedestrians (like a cycle map but for wheelchairs ansd walkers.

I'll fin tommow.
Viajero Perdido (2017-05-14 04:35:10+00:00): You put forest atop existing landuse=residential, see
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261105003#map=16/51.0984/-115.3316
huaraz (2017-05-14 15:34:42+00:00): What is wrong with having natural=wood in landuse=residential? How would you represent "here are trees" inside a landuse=* ?
Viajero Perdido (2017-05-14 15:42:58+00:00): Hi.  My point was, the trees likely no longer exist there.  CanVec has old data; the subdivision is new.

Just trying to encourage you to be careful when importing CanVec, if you must at all.  As you might know, I have a low regard for the quality of that data.  Cheers.
Nakaner (2015-11-06 19:29:17+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35133565, Begründung siehe dort