piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:28:22+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:28:02+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:27:48+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:27:15+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:15:40+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:15:23+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:14:49+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
GOwin (2018-12-22 08:20:13+00:00): Hello @ceberzeus. Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM). 

It has been noted that personal and private information were added to buildings in this changeset.  The freedom to map the world in OSM has limitations where it violates the privacy of people living in this world.  For OSM policy details on this matter, refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information.

Names of the inhabitants of these dwellings has been redacted from all your changesets.

If you have questions or concerns, please let me know or reach out the local mapping community: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PH/channels

Cheers,
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65395149
GOwin (2018-12-21 14:24:30+00:00): Hello @josepgpagatpat! Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM)

It's been noticed that you've been adding personal information to the features you've been editing on OSM. Kindly refrain from doing so, and roll back the changes you made. Let us know if you need any help with that.

Persona, and private information, has no place in a public database like OSM. You can other information, like housenumbers, streetnames, etc, but not personal information.

Cheers,
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:12:56+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:12:04+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:11:41+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
nevw (2018-12-12 05:05:17+00:00): Hi
it is preferred to use mixed case in names where suitable.
See wiki info ...
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions
Casual Mapper (2018-12-17 04:38:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/654385748 について、隣のとても大きいなビルはありますが、小さいなビルはありません。

『654385748』の場所に、デコレーションプールと複数の木があります。
hjmkth (2018-12-18 01:48:13+00:00): ご教授ありがとうございます。
Bing aerialで建設中の写真になっている時点で現地確認もしくは保留するべきでした…
大変失礼いたしました。
mueschel (2018-12-16 13:00:02+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tag "lu_reclass=kebun/tegalan"? This is not used in any other place.

Thanks, Jan
Dion Qairawan (2018-12-16 13:16:33+00:00): Hi Jan,
Sorry for the confusion, the tag stands for Landuse Reclassification. I'm making a map with landuse data and my own classification. I included the tag so that i can just apply the layer style to the data on QGIS. I plan to delete the tag after i finished making the map.

Regards, Dion
smootheFiets (2020-01-15 00:40:55+00:00): Dear Sultan Masoud,

Two of the highway=tertiaries that you've added in this changeset are linked to one another via a bridge.  That bridge, it turns out, is tagged as a path (i.e.: inaccessible to motor vehicles):

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#item=1120&zoom=17&lat=33.190854&lon=65.628692&level=2&tags=&fixable=

One consequence is that routing tools won't route cars over the bridge, thus not over 'your' highways.  Does that correspond to reality?  I'd be curious to know your opinion.

Thanks a lot in advance,
MMMigo
mueschel (2018-12-22 18:20:13+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn "csv"? Das Tag gibt es sonst nicht. 

Nebenbei, wer und was darf hier genau fahren - deine neuen Tags sagen etwas anderes aus als die alten.
naoliv (2018-12-12 17:02:58+00:00): Hi, Shane.
What's the source of this data, please?
Has this import been discussed previously somewhere?
Shane Curless (2018-12-12 23:11:18+00:00): Hi,

This data is from OpenAddresses.io, a service that compiles various other sources (usually ArcGIS and government provided data sources) into a common CSV format.

I took the CSV and converted it into XML compatible with JOSM and from there imported it out of need for my home town and surrounding areas to have correct house numbers.

I think you will find the data to have very accurate, locations for the house number, exactly where the buildings they are assigned to are located.
naoliv (2018-12-12 23:31:12+00:00): Right.
I believe there are 2 parts here: one is that we should all be aware of the import guidelines, available at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Imports, especially like this one, should be discussed first.

For this specific case it is also good to read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenAddresses.io

The other part is that I could not find any information about the license or the terms of use of this data in any of the following places:

http://results.openaddresses.io/sources/ca/on/leeds_grenville

https://github.com/openaddresses/openaddresses/blob/master/sources/ca/on/leeds_grenville.json

https://services3.arcgis.com/KQcdsE7S72bcD7R8/ArcGIS/rest/services/CivicAddress/FeatureServer/0

https://www.leedsgrenville.com/en/services/maps-and-gis.aspx

Do you know any place where we could get such information, please?
Shane Curless (2018-12-13 00:41:32+00:00): Hi, apologies as I was unaware of these policies - I was under the impression that the data simply wasn't there because it hadn't been put there yet.

So far, the best information I have found regarding the data is the description provided at https://uclg.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Viewer/index.html?appid=b563b852d0a641d19c81a619fa404847 

This states that the data sets are made available as a public resource. There does not appear to be any licensing information available, perhaps you would like me to contact UCLG and find out more this way?
naoliv (2018-12-13 01:03:50+00:00): If you can get in touch with them to clarify that, it'll be perfect.

In the meantime, can we revert this import?

There are places where the inserted data got duplicated with the objects that were already on the map. For example, this address already existed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/616966931 and you inserted the same at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6132038786

It might be interesting to discuss about this import, in a first moment, in the Canadian mappers list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca or in the forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=16

Of course, by having the license information and checking a way to not duplicate the data (and avoid some other possible inconsistencies), we can reinsert this data later into OpenStreetMap.

Is that okay for you?
Shane Curless (2018-12-13 01:36:03+00:00): Hi, yes go ahead. If we are able to re-import this data then I would like to do so with some info I had missed (mainly apartment/unit numbers) when converting the CSV so it would be best to start fresh anyway. Also, I intend to write a program that will compare positions with existing data before importing to avoid such duplicates.
naoliv (2018-12-13 01:38:33+00:00): Great!
Let me know as soon as you have any news about the license of this data.
If you have any questions and I can help, just send a message.
Thank you for your patience and understanding.
rab (2018-12-12 09:34:47+00:00): It isto early to draw residential roads here. Please wait until new imagery is available
Alternativ you can tag highway=construction. The layout of the buildings may give a hint of how the final road layout may look like
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:11:11+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2019-02-24 17:37:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-02-24 17:37:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Владимир К (2018-12-14 08:27:55+00:00): не надо дописывать адрес по городу на каждое здание.
Eugene_C (2018-12-14 08:40:45+00:00): ok
Felis Pimeja (2019-09-16 10:35:57+00:00): Привет. Зачем ты поменял теги
с
area:highway=footway
на
area:highway=pedestrian
highway=pedestrian
area=yes
?
Это не пешеходные улицы, а обыкновенные тротуары.
ghost_07 (2019-09-16 10:43:45+00:00): Я исходил из того, что там большая пешеходная зона, явно шире обычного тротуара. Даже какие-то лавочки / клумбы посередине стояли. Потому и менял.
abrensch (2019-07-15 21:18:57+00:00): Hallo DSF-DFSx,

weisst DU ob dieUmgehung Haltingen fertig ist?
abrensch (2019-07-17 20:17:49+00:00): Hab was gefunden, dauert also wohl noch:

https://www.weil-am-rhein.de/pb/stadt/Home/Aktuelles+_+Projekte/nordwestumfahrung+haltingen_+haltinger+und+basler+strasse+noch+bis+ende+august+gesperrt.html
PT-53 (2019-11-12 07:29:43+00:00): Aktuelle Info:
Fertigstellung Ende Dez. 2019?
https://www.verlagshaus-jaumann.de/inhalt.weil-am-rhein-umfahrung-wird-1-8-millionen-teurer-als-gedacht.fcc2016c-9f38-4d19-8b87-1b27a4f07b73.html
osmviborg (2018-12-12 08:34:06+00:00): Det her ser underligt ud. Er det en pontonbro der er lagt ud i nat, eller øver du dig bare?
Ticker Berkin (2020-09-13 09:28:26+00:00): I notice you've put closed ways tagged highway=unclassified, area=yes around junctions. This causes grief to routers that assume these highway/ways can be used. Why have you done this?
James Derrick (2020-09-13 11:41:01+00:00): This tagging practice is expressly _not_ one I use for exactly the reasons you cite.

Please check the object history before pointing fingers.

As point of fact, I have been replacing highway=* area=yes with individual road lines.

I suggest you read this note:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2081923
Ticker Berkin (2020-09-13 13:17:13+00:00): Really sorry - I'll study the history carefully next time.
Mac_01 (2018-12-12 16:36:29+00:00): Hallo gla_weiss,

so kann man sich auch beschäftigen.

Ich habe im November mir erlaubt, die Flächen hier von den Straßen zu lösen, weil ich es mit den verklebten Flächen als absolut unübersichtlich und in dem Zustand als auch nicht wartbar fand. (Straßen zu selektieren ist da ja mehr Zufall)

Soweit ich sehen kann, hast du heute dies wieder rückgängig gemacht.

Dieses Spiel können wir natürlich endlos weiter spielen.

Von dem her die Frage, hast du die Diskussion im OSM Forum bzgl. Polygone & verklebte Flächen mitbekommen ?

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64439&p=11

Daraus entstand auch ein Proposal:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Proposed_features/Empfehlung_zur_Verwendung_von_Multipolygonen#Proposal (siehe Punkt 4)

Eine Abstimmung über das Proposal gibt es noch nicht. Aber nach meiner Meinung ist die Mehrheit der Mapper gegen das Verkleben.

Ich werde an deinen Sachen keine Änderungen mehr vornehmen.

Aber vielleicht hast du Lust deinen Mappingstil bzgl. Landuses und verkleben mit Straßen mal zu überdenken

Viele Grüße

Mac


P.S. 

Wir müssen hier nicht über die Vor & Nachteile der unterschiedlichen Stile diskutieren. Dazu wurde im Forum bereits alles gesagt.
Warin61 (2018-12-12 23:40:07+00:00): Hi,Getting there with the relation... but still not 100%

The relation type should be multipolygon, not building.

The relation should than have another tag (like it has a name tag) - this one is the physical tag for what it is .. a search on 'court' the OSMwiki got https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcourthouse 
So amenity=courthouse looks like the best tag to use here. 
-----------------
The relation has a name.

The outer way of that relation also has a name .. this is not on. Remove the name from the outer way and it will be better. The outer way/s should not have any tag that is used by the relation. 

------------------
The inner way is tagged as a type=building? Why? It does not need any tag on it at all ... just leave it blank and it will work well.
mavl (2019-02-24 17:37:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
waldhans (2018-12-13 18:41:30+00:00): it seems there are some duplicate nodes on the boundary along the 'Bosbeek' like
node 634469456
node 634469335
Please check and correct; 
Thank's, Kurt
sebastic (2018-12-13 19:09:32+00:00): I don't find any issues in the datasets I use (which are limited to the administrative boundaries).

Other features should not be connected the boundaries, so I advise you to move the other features away from the boundaries instead of merging duplicate nodes.
waldhans (2018-12-13 19:57:16+00:00): sorry, I give you step-by-step instructions to reproduce the error:

load node 634464833 in JOSM (Download object...)
load from the slippy map in Josm an area around this point, about 3km along the Bosbeek
now use the Validation tool in JOSM to find the errors

There are at least 12 duplicate nodes on the border.
You should do this check along the whole border you edited.

If you have problems to find and correct the errors, please let me know!
sebastic (2018-12-13 20:13:53+00:00): Those look like disconnected ways resulting from the Replace geometry action.

Because those ways were not modified when the boundary way was replaced, the validator doesn't check them.

I don't consider these nodes a problem as they belong to different ways and should not be nodes shared between those ways. In my JOSM layer they aren't exact duplicates, their high precision coordinates are different.

If those nodes do bother you, see my previous comment.
waldhans (2018-12-13 21:35:43+00:00): So you tell me that your JOSM is not reporting multiple errors "duplicate nodes"? If this is true, we should compare the validator .settings!
Warin61 (2018-12-27 22:05:40+00:00): Hi,
Combining Lurline St into one segment means the bus route relation for route 686 will not work! 

Please leave the street as 2 separate bits... You may find similar issues if you try combining separate segments into one segment .. even if they are the same street/road .. they may be separated for any number of reasons.
carciofo (2019-01-09 17:24:40+00:00): Hi, what's the source for the terminal name changes please? Do you have on-the-ground knowledge that those are the names on maps, etc?
hjmkth (2018-12-12 09:36:13+00:00): 道路ではなく建物の誤りです。申し訳ございません。。
Warin61 (2019-02-24 05:21:10+00:00): What is your source for moving Terrys Creek to run nuder Progress Ave?
mueschel (2018-12-13 10:14:45+00:00): Hi,
you added a huge number of "building" tags to nodes - they should only appear on the way outlining the building, but not on the nodes.

In addition, I found thousands of "KODOBIEKTU=BUD" on the objects - this seems to be a mistake. Could you have a look and fix these?

Jan
maraf24 (2018-12-13 21:29:29+00:00): Import, probably from BDOT database. 
KODOBIEKTU=BUD just means "building".
The data is outdated, aerial photo shows that many buildings don't exist or have different shape.
I'm going to revert this.
borishag (2018-12-14 09:02:12+00:00): Hallo,

Ik zie dat je onze vestiging hebt omgezet van een node maar een gebouw (waypoint). Zou je de originele node met alle daarbij horende informatie weer terug kunnen zetten? zodat we weer optimaal vindbaar zijn?

B.Hageman
Editor AS Watson BNL stores
b.hageman@nl.aswatson.com
Jakka (2018-12-14 12:00:03+00:00): Hoezo niet vindbaar....https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.32468/4.93039&layers=N
borishag (2018-12-14 12:11:28+00:00): Los van de onvolledigheid van het adres (woonplaats ontbreekt) is deze winkel niet te vinden als je een search doet op "chemist" of op bijvoorbeeld "operator" Als ik me beperk tot België dan zijn al onze 395 winkels (KV & ICI) nodes.
Jakka (2018-12-14 12:17:01+00:00): De onvolledigheid zou geen invloed hebben op de search. zie mijn test https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=chemist%20turnhout#map=19/51.32466/4.93007&layers=N
Jakka (2018-12-14 12:20:37+00:00): het bewerken plaatsen van oa shop is toegelaten op nod als area zie rechts onder description op deze pagina. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
borishag (2018-12-14 12:23:17+00:00): Als je een search doet in overpass dan krijg je geen gegevens 

**[out:xml];
{{geocodeArea:Belgium}}->.searchArea;
// gather results
(
way[operator~"Kruidvat"](area.searchArea);
);
// print results
out meta;
>;
out meta qt;
Jakka (2018-12-14 12:30:35+00:00): dit komt voorbeeld van Kaai dat de operator (die staat wel gevraagd in de overpass) niet ingevuld is. Ik baseer mij op deze wiki waar men heeft geprobeerd om winkelketens te groeperen en zo een meer uniforme tagging invoerd. Niet iedereen zoekt uitgebreid naar nodige documentatie. Dus alle winkels zijn operator zuiver kruidvat geen hoger bedrijf overkoepellende naam. Zou deze dan proberen in te voeren in de wiki ?https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:BelgianChainStores:K
borishag (2018-12-14 12:30:49+00:00): Zolang Nodes nog toegestaan zijn en er geen algemene ruling is over het omzetten lijkt het me zinvol om alleen nieuwe poi's of gebouwen als way neer te zetten. Lodde1949 heeft in ieder geval verzuimd om de overige info uit de node mee om te zetten, en dat is het verwijderen van relevante en juiste informatie (niet toegestaan)