piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-09-03 18:54:15+00:00): Je hebt een stuk van de Belikstraat ontdaan van de tagging en dus verwijderd van de kaart. Is dat de bedoeling?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-03 18:56:06+00:00): Je hebt nu een deel van de Belikstraat in een multipolygoon veranderd. Wat is de reden?  
het lijkt me beter je edits terug te draaien. mee eens?
MVG.
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-03 18:59:17+00:00): reverted by changeset  #90377303
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust
Gr Eggie
eggie (2020-09-03 19:07:50+00:00): PDOK is hier wel de juiste keuze..  Go Map is best lastig om onder de knie te krijgen.
Op een computer met een reguliere editor zal het wellicht makkelijker gaan.
Gr Eggie
tarta (2020-09-03 20:26:40+00:00): Ana Lessa, boa tarde, você sabe informar qual o novo endereço? Posso mover o nó para o novo local mantendo o histórico.
GartenStuhl (2020-09-04 06:27:36+00:00): Your changes are looking fine to me, i looked at some of them and didn't notice strange things, so well. there is you review ;)
nitram1234 (2020-09-10 13:59:38+00:00): Thank you for the review! I am still new here and wanted to double check that I am doing things correctly. Btw, do you know if there is a wiki for Geneva for OSM that is up to date? The default one seems to be quite out of date. Thanks in advance et merci!
GartenStuhl (2020-09-15 04:06:35+00:00): Sorry, i cant help you with that.
For myself i just use the wiki, try to hold on that and if i see differences in the local map i just go with that if its reasonable.
And of course, you are being watched here anyway ;)
*Martin* (2022-01-08 11:43:52+00:00): Hello. Are you sure that all features you mapped as natural=sinkhole (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844045373) are really sinkholes and not just dolines? Because sinkhole should have natural surface opening where water sinks. Please see also https://www.freemap.sk/?map=15/48.550844/20.470060&layers=X
*Martin* (2022-01-08 11:45:56+00:00): Anyway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dsinkhole is ambiguous as in description it also mentions dolines. And images on that wiki page doesn't very match features found in Slovak karst.
*Martin* (2022-01-08 11:50:39+00:00): BTW I just found https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sinkhole%3Ddoline
*Martin* (2022-01-08 11:51:58+00:00): ...and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sinkhole

So maybe your tagging may be actually OK :-)

(sorry for spamming)
mgpx (2022-01-08 19:08:43+00:00): Ahoj Martin. I think natural=sinkhole is the original top level tag, while sinkhole=* is a second level what was introduced a few years later. That's why many dolines are still tagged only with the top level one, and that's why old mappers like me remembered only the top level one and did not use the 2nd level. 

As of today, we should use both, I'll fix my earlier edits
*Martin* (2022-01-10 08:16:14+00:00): Thanks for the clarification :-)
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:31:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90377007
smootheFiets (2020-09-11 09:53:27+00:00): Kijk, bord NL:J37 kende ik nog niet!
Ik twijfelde hier tussen good en intermediate. Mijn keuze ging uit naar good omdat het met de racefiets toch fatsoenlijk te doen was, ondanks het bordje "slecht wegdek". Ik vermoed dat je de hobbels pas met 60 km/u voelt ;) 
Dus, intermediate kan ook.
multimodaal (2020-09-12 10:45:10+00:00): Hoi, je kan hier inderdaad verschillend naar kijken; de wegbeheerder vond het "slecht", in de auto vond ik het "redelijk", op ERTRO-37-349 hobbelde het behoorlijk, maar dat doet het vaker. Maar voor de keuze tussen good en intermediate in OSM is jouw ervaring op de racefiets denk ik het meest relevant, dus als jouw ervaring echt is dat het voor een gemiddelde racefietser op smalle banden echt lekker te doen is, dan is good wellicht beter. 

Of kan het zijn dat in de tussentijd tussen onze bezoeken de situatie achteruit is gegaan, bijvoorbeeld door bouwverkeer met overbelading? Dat zou de wijziging van maximumsnelheid (met als opgegeven reden het slechte wegdek)   kunnen verklaren. Hoe dan ook mooi fietsen daar (-: Groet!
smootheFiets (2020-09-25 20:40:01+00:00): Hoi E de Wit,
Ik heb de vrijheid genomen om een plaatsnaambordje Surhuisterveen (7873507965) aan te passen. Ik heb "It fean" van de Friese naam verwijdert. Het staat niet op het bordje: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/iaktEUVxTJ7oYxLA8sIrcd 
Plaatsnamen zitten altijd wat gevoelig, daarom waarschuw ik je even. :)
Groet'n uut Grunn,
smootheFiets
E de Wit (2020-09-25 21:56:34+00:00): Hoi smootheFiets,

Je hebt helemaal gelijk, dit is een slordigheid van mijn kant. Meestal pak ik Mapillary er wel bij, maar bij het updaten van BAG vergeet ik wel eens de extra dingen die ik wijzig te controleren..

In dit geval heb ik (foutief) de waardes van:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/48123231
overgenomen.

Groetnis út Ljouwert,
E de Wit
nw520 (2020-09-03 21:17:50+00:00): wikidata=Q98511264 wiederhergestellt.
user_5359 (2020-09-04 08:50:22+00:00): Hallo! Bitte kontrolliere nochmal den Weg http://www.osm.org/way/219053517: Mir scheint, dass Dir hier ein Kopierfehler unterlaufen ist.
johantiden (2020-09-05 07:33:45+00:00): Orphan provides_feature!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7517642#map=19/59.33402/18.06956
eggie (2020-09-03 20:34:21+00:00): Oke Wistaire.. goed mogelijk... Geen uitzondering voor tweewielers hier?
Dus oneway:bicycle=no ?

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-04 08:24:40+00:00): Aangepast met uitzonderingen tweewielers..
literan (2020-09-08 10:31:02+00:00): не надо спамить рекламными текстами. Интернет-сайты, облака, людей, мысли и прочие не существующие на местности объекты мы не вносим в карту.
Carto'Cité (2020-09-16 19:05:34+00:00): Bonjour Patrick,
Je pense que le bicycle=designated n'a pas trop de sens dans la mesure où il est déjà décrit les bandes cyclables sur cette route (cycleway=lane). Dis si tu vois une raison de le laisser. Merci d'avance pour ton aide :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2020-09-16 19:06:45+00:00): Pardon ; pour être plus clair je parle de cette route : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23023495
Charles
Carto'Cité (2020-09-16 19:18:25+00:00): Une autre question :)
Concernant les pistes cyclables que tu as ajoutées (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844060273#map=18/48.80342/1.89824 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844060274) ; est-ce que tu peux me préciser s’il y a bien une séparation avec les piétons comme de la peinture ? J'ai commencé à corriger en précisant qu'il s'agit d'un trottoir cyclable (highway=footway + footway=sidewalk + bicycle=designated + oneway:bicycle=yes) mais il manque cette information importante pour pouvoir considérer s'il s'agit d'une vraie piste ou non (segregated=yes/no ?). Aussi sur les photos Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=68doIR_qfH_VeNHz0RID1A) on voit qu'il y avait en 2018 une bande et non une piste au début de la partie ouest. Est-ce que tu sais si c'est toujours le cas où si elle a été transformée en piste ?
Merci d'avance pour ton aide. Parfois le plus simple est de prendre des photos pour échanger et pour cela le projet et l'application Mapillary sont vraiment efficaces.
À bientôt.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Patrick78 (2020-09-17 11:02:09+00:00): Bonjour,
Il ya bien des lignes blanches sur les cotés de la piste comme tu peux le voir sur 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=pqtw_WQQw1O1IMUcYoNPVw&lat=48.80388159610925&lng=1.896894659910913&z=17
à droite donc coté sud. C'est pour cela que j'ajouté cette partie qui n'était pas présente alors qu'elle existe depuis longtemps. idem dnas le sens descendant. tu peux constater les signe vélo peints sur le sol + ligne sur https://www.google.fr/maps/@48.8031615,1.8987089,91m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=fr
ex intersection rue Saint-Louis coté nord.
Historiquement la piste s'arrêtait de moire à l'arrêt de bus nommée Rue Andin mais en fait elle monte jusqu'a le passage piéton en haut. Donc je pense que ma piste est bien dessiné après concernant lé définition exacte dans les options Designated et autres là je suis moins sûr car je ne suis pas expert. Si tu veux corriger cette piste essaye de t'attaquer au sujet du rue point rue du pontel et rue des artisans où la piste est physiquement séparé par une petite bordure coté nord qui n'apparait pas sur openstreet. Mais cela reste du détail.
https://www.google.fr/maps/@48.8052902,1.8934219,3a,75y,74.93h,72.44t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sHbceCc6GBpGqnuvVJLJoPg!2e0!6s%2F%2Fgeo3.ggpht.com%2Fcbk%3Fpanoid%3DHbceCc6GBpGqnuvVJLJoPg%26output%3Dthumbnail%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.tactile.gps%26thumb%3D2%26w%3D203%26h%3D100%26yaw%3D158.00244%26pitch%3D0%26thumbfov%3D100!7i16384!8i8192?hl=fr
Tu vois bien une petite bordure. Bizarrement sur les modifs que j'ai faite la piste cyclable apparait en pointillé rouge au lieu de vert continu.

En espérant avoir répondu à tes questions. Cdlt,
Patrick78 (2020-09-17 11:07:30+00:00): Conccernant ta remarque: où il est déjà décrit les bandes cyclables sur cette route (cycleway=lane)
Attnetion pour moi c'est valable lorsque la piste est sur le coté adjacent à la route sans séparation physique. Là les parties que j'ai ajouté, on aprle bien d'une piste cyclable de l'autre coté des voitures donc bien distincte. Mais je suis preneur d'explication. Rien à voir je découvre CartoVeloIdF. Ce sujet de cartographier les pistes cyclables devrait etre une obligation légale des villes afin de favoriser ce mode de déplacement.
Carto'Cité (2020-10-20 17:01:58+00:00): Bonjour Patrick,
Pardon pour le délai de retour et encore merci pour tes explications. Quand il n'y a pas de séparation physique, il s'agit bien d'une bande et pas d'une piste nous sommes d'accord :)
Attention les bandes cyclables ne sont pas souvent rendus sur les cartes. N'hésite pas à aller sur Cyclosm pour visualiser les aménagements cyclables. Sinon iD n'est pas très adapté pour contribuer sur les aménagements cyclables. Si tu as l'intention de contribuer régulièrement sur les aménagements cyclables, je ne peux que te conseiller d'apprendre à utiliser JOSM qui malgré son apparence est un logiciel très puissant et très bien fait.
Bon courage pour tes prochaines contributions.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
DaveF (2021-10-13 23:51:37+00:00): Hi
I'm checking golf features.
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=844062479

http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=844062480

Are these both bunkers & are they grass lined instead of sand?
BrackoNe (2020-10-29 12:34:47+00:00): Pozdrav,

Molim te da ne dodaješ naziv "Round about" na kružne tokove jer kružni tokovi nemaju naziv.

Hvala unapred,
Nemanja
MirjanOil (2020-10-29 12:50:59+00:00): Pozdrav Nemanja,

Nema problema.

Pozdrav,
Mirjan
BrackoNe (2020-10-29 12:51:59+00:00): Hvala! Sve najbolje!
MirjanOil (2020-10-29 12:54:40+00:00): Nema na čemu.
Takođe...
Vinber-Pro (2022-05-19 08:10:32+00:00): salut,
l'image que tu avais ajouté à été retiréz, sans doute par des gens que j'ai eu en formation, avec également un changement de nom.

Si il y a erreur de leur part, n'hésite pas :)

et je peux être relais évidemment !

à plus

PS : tu viens au sotm à Nantes ?
trigpoint (2020-09-09 16:22:27+00:00): Are there really so many fast food outlets in an industrial area?

I cannot imagine enough people wandering into an industrial estate on their way home from the pub.

Cheers Phil
eastender (2020-09-09 18:21:15+00:00): Yes, they are so-called dark kitchens. They exist to service the fast-food delivery sector. There are a few clusters of dark kitchens in various parts of London. Typically, they are in temporary units of disused car parks or in railway arch premises. There is an argument for tagging these type of outlets as either fast food or caterer but I’m usually guided by how they have registered themselves with FHRS.
trigpoint (2020-09-09 20:25:14+00:00): They should not be tagged as fast food, they are not retail outlets.

Fast food to a map user means I can go there to order a takeaway on their way home and they will be disappointed if they can't.

I tend to ignore those businesses in fhrs which are not verifiable.

Cheers Phil
eastender (2020-09-09 21:18:23+00:00): Fair enough. I'll switch them all to caterers for consistency.
trigpoint (2020-09-10 13:14:23+00:00): Thank you
os-emmer (2023-06-19 19:48:48+00:00): Du hast hier etwas eingetragen, was ich nicht einordnen kann. Was ist das?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844067541
431c57 (2023-06-19 20:40:02+00:00): Puh, ja … 
Laut Luftbild und Kataster-Foo würde mal behaupen, es ist eine power=substation.
Ist aber schon ein paar Tage her, das ich da das letzte mal lang gegangen und hingeschaut habe. Komme aktuell auch nicht mehr regelmäßig vorbei.
PeterPan99 (2021-04-08 18:45:24+00:00): According to Golley Slater's website, their address is:
Richmond House, 
5-8 Richmond Terrace,
Otley Road, 
etc.....

However, it is currently tagged as:
addr:housename=Richmond House
addr:housenumber=5-8
addr:street=Otley Road, 

which would return it as:

Richmond House
5 - 8 Otley Road,
etc.  

I suggest re-tagging it as:
addr:housename=Richmond House
addr:housenumber=5-8
addr:street=Richmond Terrace
addr:parentstreet=Otley Road
etc.
Please see my proposal at 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Proposal_to_Document_the_Key_%22addr:parentstreet%22

Peter
TrekClimbing (2021-04-08 21:36:46+00:00): Thanks. Done (and a few others)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102591088
eggie (2020-09-04 06:23:45+00:00): Even wat aangepast. construction motorway verwijderd van 1ste melmseweg
construction=yes omgezet in highway=construction bij het bouwproject stukje Dwarswal. 
lanes=1 verwijderd (meer voor opritten eenrichting)
maxspeed 50  hier? 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-09-04 06:26:15+00:00): Linksonder Wakemanstraat loopt volgens mij dubbel met een middenberm.
literan (2020-09-08 10:29:38+00:00): вот только это надо было не на дом ставить, а на территорию школы, где теги самой школы стоят. перенес.
limes11 (2022-05-14 18:44:50+00:00): Hi, 

kannst du mal hier schauen?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3179085

Angeblich steht das alles noch. Du hattest es 2020 geprüft, wie war denn da der Zustand?

Passt nicht zusammen.

VG, Limes
eggie (2020-09-04 06:50:29+00:00): Dag Steven, 
Even ter leering ende vermaeck  Gebouwen geen adres geven. De adresnode is voldoende.
Scholen kunnen op meer manieren. amenity=school hoort er wel bij. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
name= Trommelaar 1-53 ??
Die nummers horen er niet. Trommelaar gebouwnaam? 

De adresgegevens van de gebouwen  heb ik verwijderd.

 De schoolnamen heb ik toegevoegd aan de adresnodes. Je kunt ook schoolterreinen intekeken en daar de naam opzetten. Van de Calvijnschool kun je ook één groot terrein maken die de twee gebouwen omvat. 
Zie als voorbeeld het Ichtuscollege. 
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-04 07:13:19+00:00): Alle paden (Trommelaar)  en wegen heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse=grass  Geen vlakken vastplakken aan wegen. De kaart wordt dan onwerkbaar voor anderen.
alzyee (2020-09-16 02:35:50+00:00): I don't think there are cycle lanes on this section of the road. Was this road recently widened?
Hunter Irvin (2020-09-16 21:01:44+00:00): Thanks for commenting. This was my first edit in OSM so appologies if I've done something wrong. 
I was working off of an August 2019 SUSBR shapefile of statewide bike trails, provided by ODOT. I don't believe there are cycle lanes (validated on google street view) but it appears its designated as a cycleway per ODOT, which is why I added it here. LMK if there's a better way to tag
alzyee (2020-09-17 00:52:47+00:00): "validated google street view" You can not use any incompatible licenses (definitely not google street view or maps). as source or confirm data with them in the process of making edits on openstreetmap. I don't know what SUSBR is (quick search didn't turn up anything) but unless you know for a fact the license is compatible (likely isn't) you cannot use it as a source either.
If you drive or bike through the area and take some pictures. Those pictures or what you see while you are there are a valid source. 

bike lanes are cycle lanes.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dlane

This is a highway for car traffic that does not prohibit bicycle use. I would not say it is a particularly good highway to ride a bike down but that has no bearing on tagging. The majority of the road that you tagged doesn't have a marked shoulder or anything that vaguely resembles a bike lane.  So the way it was tagged before is appropriate highway=tertiary and no special bike tag (bike-yes is assumed).
Oregon On Demand (2020-09-03 22:56:15+00:00): The proper tagging of this area is ambiguous as it is is owned federally (managing water conservation for power) and then operated at county level providing recreation as a county park. It appears the best way to tag an area such as this is using the protected area tag along with the natural reserve tag to indicate the conservation aspects and allowance of recreational activities. I've mapped the individual recreation grounds within the park with the recreation tag. Hopefully this will work for now until more consensus is reached on these type of areas. wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands
sabamacx (2020-09-04 13:45:04+00:00): Is this the name of the building, or the organisation working within the building? If the latter it may be better served with a node inside for the organisation, and leaving the name of the building blank.
(The building might have a name like Training #1?)
PeteTheMapper (2020-09-04 22:19:31+00:00): Thanks sabamacx. I've adopted the methodology suggested - makes sense. Have updated CAE and one other building accordingly.

New to this so no sure about etiquette of updating other peoples work?
repoi (2020-09-03 22:01:02+00:00): Der Changeset ist so groß, da ich den Weg mit der Berliner Mauer verbunden habe (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41779143), obwohl nur die Alexandrinenstraße geplant war. Falls dieser Teil wieder rückgängig gemacht werden soll, wäre gut zu wenn mir das jemand mitteilen könnte.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-23 14:40:48+00:00): Are  you sure that construction=shed is correct? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/747496146/history - months-long shed construction seems unusual
Sander H (2021-03-24 19:04:35+00:00): quite sure it's one of the on-shore sheds for the houseboats over there
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-04 04:53:56+00:00): Hi Logan Nuernberger, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several mapped trails? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=90382157#15/38.5601/-90.5427

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Logan Nuernberger (2020-09-08 12:48:39+00:00): Hi!
I actually work for Missouri State Parks, and my position is responsible for maintaining the accuracy of our tail data and maps. Lately, I have begun to update 3rd party sources of trail info with our official data to get things more consistent. I’m going through OSM currently and replacing all “Paths” with our official route data. 
You’ll notice that I’ve not really deleted anything at Castlewood, just replaced. Any changes to trail layout were done at the direction of the park superintendent. 

-Logan
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-10 07:56:36+00:00): Thanks for your answer. However, please don't remove and redraw more or less the same objects. This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-04 04:45:31+00:00): Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

#test #data
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
leofranz (2020-09-04 08:18:28+00:00): Hallo Ervin26,
du hast mit deiner maps.me app ein Gerichtsgebäude in Innsbruck eingezeichnet. Bitte gib Acht was du da einzeichnest, die Änderungen werden direkt in Openstreetmap übernommen. Ich habe mir erlaubt das Gericht wieder zu entfernen. Schöne Grüße, leofranz
McKulkin (2020-09-25 13:31:59+00:00): Какой бардак с https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11579052#map=17/60.62884/30.07040
_PG_ (2020-09-25 16:28:21+00:00): Не моё творение. Но да, релейшн для дороги использовать задумка сомнительная.
houston_mapper1 (2020-09-05 12:02:43+00:00): please verify your edits before you commit. this edit changed a secondary highway into a golf cart path.
arehaan (2020-09-07 12:09:25+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for looking into my edits. I have Added a driveway  from Golf court  haven’t changed  highway tag .previous editor has converted secondary road into golf court .

Regards,
arehaan
houston_mapper1 (2020-09-07 13:08:20+00:00): sorry about that, i looked at it again and messaged the older user about this issue.
UPegasus (2020-09-13 21:25:01+00:00): Hello!
Did You align base layer before mapping?
All Your new buildings are offset from surrounding ones. Also you are wrong with their real size and apply them together with fences or asphalted yard.
Please keep this in mind, as it's harder to correct your mistakes than to apply the objects correctly on my own.
EarthtoTones (2020-09-18 17:30:09+00:00): Hello UPegasus,
  I aligned the ways that I created to Maxar Premium Imagery, since it aligns best with roads such as way 151223864 and seemed to be the most updated imagery for this particular area. Looking back over my edits, I made a few adjustments to building geometry. Thank you!
UPegasus (2020-09-19 08:46:20+00:00): Hi!
Unfortunately, Maxar has worse image quality than Bing, although newer than it. That's why I edited several of your objects by size. When applying objects, it is better to stop at one of the sources to avoid displacements.
Best regards!
DressyPear4 (2020-09-05 05:29:43+00:00): Olá, evite alterar a classificação de vias sem justificativa.
Evite adicionar áreas de matas exageradas( sobrepondo locais onde nem tem vegetação).
DressyPear4 (2020-09-05 05:33:40+00:00): Desconsidere o comentário sobre vias, foi para outro mapeador da região.
DUGA (2022-03-08 16:48:49+00:00): Your edit has been partially reverted.

Please do not mess with traffic engineering, and your edits in Pennsylvania will be closely watched.
5m4u9 (2020-09-04 04:16:10+00:00): hace tiempo me comentaron que por ucuchi pasaba antes el antiguo camino a aguirre, en los años 50's, aunque no dijeron si había laguna, la salida sale casi en wacanqui. voy a averiguar más
JJIglesias (2020-09-04 05:12:16+00:00): Posiblemente si, el camino viejo a Aguirre fuera por Ucuchi, yo he recorrido esa zona con mi Buggy y hay varias sendas, muchas de las lagunas son artificiales para retener agua para riego
Slds
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:36:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90384176
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-04 04:51:36+00:00): Hi jazzyj11, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several parts of this golf course, which have been mapped by a different contributor yesterday? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
aharvey (2020-09-04 03:52:17+00:00): FYI I just created the proposal to try and formalise the existing tag for a rock overhang shelter see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tag:shelter_type%3Drock_shelter
user_5359 (2020-09-05 07:43:00+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags 
AGENCY=1
AGENCY_DES=NORTHFIELD TWP
GlobalID={287063E1-63BD-423A-B04C-E30384522FC3}
OBJECTID=2
SHAPESTAre=1.6558210500769043E8
SHAPESTLen=322344.7624470328
cbasOptIn=NO
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
ZeLonewolf (2020-09-05 14:10:03+00:00): Those should have been cleaned up, can you tell me which relation you're seeing that on?
mueschel (2020-09-05 14:55:43+00:00): Here you go:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/XJc
user_5359 (2020-09-05 14:57:09+00:00): mueschel was faster :)