piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 20:34:21+00:00): You were "fixing" buildings that did not exist in reality, some user created them as fiction. 
That means you did not even look onto "Bing", which you claim as source, as they are not visible there. 
Mechanically fixing data problems without looking into the reasons for the errors is masking those reasons, and making reverts more difficult.
 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671562528/history

and in CS #67448998
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671560651/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671562523/history
 
Continent-sized changesets are not helpful either.
B_KSL (2019-02-23 05:11:28+00:00): Hello,
Yes you are right. I change again and again some nodes without even looking at a photo. Mostly this is unnecessary. These are simple technical errors such as duplicated nodes or crossing lines. I also try not to delete any objects (like buildings) - visible on photos or not - so it's quite possible that I'm "fixing" something that does not actually exist. That would not be wise because there are quite a lot objects that are there although not visible in any photo. My mistakes here are unfortunate, not precisely specified sources. In some rare cases, this can also be called as "masking". For that I can only apologize and try to do better, specify no sources etc. More obvious are oversized changsets. I will limit it in the future although I believe that in the case of problems with reverts, the number of objects plays a role rather than the size of the area. Thanks for your hints. Regards.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:35:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Kovoschiz (2019-02-24 15:43:25+00:00): Can you explain your unsourced and non-standard naming of Hung Hing Road bus-only lane?
Kovoschiz (2019-02-24 15:49:42+00:00): Aside from designating it as highway=motorway instead of motorway_link.
jc86035 (2019-02-26 13:43:03+00:00): The edit to the bus-only slip road was partially reverted by Kovosch. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67581939
Horza (2019-02-22 13:24:23+00:00): Has this been scouted out or is it based entirely on aerial imagery? It looks to be like this driveway stops near where it hits the trees and the southern half actually comes from the road coming down from the junction with Gwynford Lane
bathis (2019-07-08 15:07:30+00:00): Hi Horza,
Thanks for reviewing the edit and we apologize for the delayed response. Here the edit was made entirely based on the aerial image. It’s a clear mistake from my side.  It is correct to add roads till what we see from the aerial image than assuming. Going forward there won’t be any of these kind of errors.
Regards,
Bathis
freebeer (2019-07-08 19:28:33+00:00): serwoas bathis,

i am guessing you are part of  mapping group given the flood of commentary of late, although it is neither obvious, nor relevant.

in any case, not seeing the unmodified entry of this changeset, i'd like to propose that you expand your aerial imageries to include the archive and sometimes leaf-off imagery of old bing as esri clarity.  and in this area which blindly i am guessing to be in part of florida from past mapping altercations, the current esri imagery looks to be good if from a lighting angle that i cannot parse with my present latitude,

horza, i thought you had no seasons which is reason for me to call your haunts me home.  on the other hand, that means leaves, which means lousy aerial mapping.

arrgh.

cheers.  and ignore me.  please.
Horza (2019-07-08 20:03:57+00:00): freebeer, haha, yes, it can be hard to work out where things are sometimes. You get used to it though

I tend to use a mixture of Esri and Mapbox, Mapbox tends to be oversaturated a lot of the time, but having two different image sets to look at can help with visually parsing what I'm looking at, especially as the lighting is different. It's sometimes essential with outlining houses as esri imagery is full of stitching errors between different areas

bathis: The Duval property map can be pretty helpful sometimes, especially for weird situations like this
http://maps.coj.net/DuvalProperty/
rab (2019-02-21 19:09:15+00:00): Why? It connects a primary with a trunk,
jula_june (2019-02-22 22:18:40+00:00): Hi Rab,
Looking at the imagery and less traffic along the corridor I made it as tertiary, thanks for changing back to secondary.
Baloo Uriza (2019-02-22 00:50:54+00:00): Looks like there was a few roads there but nice find.  I fixed i up a bit if you want to take another look.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67417800
yaswap (2019-07-03 11:41:33+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit and making the changes. We apologize for the delayed response. 

We are always happy to engage with the OSM community.(commenting on behalf of the editor)

Regards,
yaswap
tomhukins (2019-03-19 14:10:00+00:00): Hi, this edit creates a new node for Brinkley's Estate agents right next to the node that already exists on the map.  I've removed your duplicate node, merged additional data onto the existing node and fixed the format of the opening hours.
tdctdctdc (2019-04-21 09:57:15+00:00): Hi FuxDror,
I noticed you changed way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240240094 from a "military area" into a "sidewalk".
If this was a mistake, could you please change it back? I believe it is misleading and potentially dangerous for map users.
If this was an intentional change (in the spirit of censorship?), I invite you to discuss your reasoning at the Israeli OSM forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=33).
Thanks.
SafwatHalaby (2020-09-25 08:54:03+00:00): Hi there, I noticed that you glued several bus stops into roads. This is problematic. I've fixed them in the most reasonable way possible Please let me know if I missed anything.
abakus_uploader (2019-02-21 23:30:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-02-21 09:21:49+00:00): Une mosquée c'est amenity=place_of_worship avec religion=muslim. Votre name=Musulmane est faux.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67420254
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-02-21 09:22:30+00:00): Et le positionnement au milieu de la rue est également erroné.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67420254
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-02-21 09:23:25+00:00): Un name seul est toujours faux. Dans votre cas je suppose que c'est shop=beauty
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67420276
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
VictorIE (2023-07-19 18:19:10+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9344924/

Cabra-Glasnevin LEA incorrectly includes Stoneybatter and Grangegorman areas.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4658842

This is the 2014 North Inner City LEA, there is no 2019 North Inner City LEA. Different between Dorset Street and Phibsborough Bus Garage.

https://www.boundarycommittee.ie/Maps/Dublin%20City%20LEA%20Report%20Map%202018.pdf
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
pio2_122 (2019-02-21 09:41:06+00:00): Moim zdaniem linie Transportu na żądanie nie powinny być dodawane do relacji Komunikacji Miejskiej w Szczecinie. Można jedynie uzupełnić ich prztstanki z opisem działania TnŻ.
Transport na żądanie to tak naprawdę "liniowa taksówka" - trzeba zamówić kurs, poczekać na odpowiednią liczbę osób i dopiero wtedy odbywa się kurs.
Nie jest to tylko moje zdanie, ponieważ zapewne celowo kolega diverpl, który ogarnia KM w Szczecinie nie dodał tych linii.
szymo1500 (2019-02-22 09:07:38+00:00): Z jednej strony się zgadzam, z drugiej zarządza tym ZDiTM. Można też dodać dodatkową relację, która łączyłaby relacje linii transportu na żądanie w jedną, a tą dodać do relacji Komunikacji Miejskiej w Szczecinie.
pio2_122 (2019-02-24 18:54:01+00:00): Hm, moim zdaniem to dobry pomysł.
philam48 (2019-03-03 08:52:44+00:00): Hi there, this path does not connect to the driveway in real life. I have checked this twice with an on-site survey.
AndjelaS (2019-03-04 09:35:39+00:00): Dear philam48,

Based on the imagery, I got the impression that these two ways were connected. Thank you for pointing me to the mistake, and thanks for correcting it for me.

Cheers
snigdhap (2019-07-31 06:03:24+00:00): Hi Adiatma IRM-RV,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Surabaya, I have come across the way 509828118, as per the latest imagery path is not existing. 

Kindly refer this screenshot : https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-Bk6baDv0sBw/XUEu1AFobkI/AAAAAAAABIA/ZCqch187-zouNF4HOTIkfOA9uJJ5UuCwQCK8BGAs/s0/2019-07-30.png

Please suggest what needs to be done in such cases.

Thanks in advance.
Adiatma IRM-RV (2019-07-31 06:11:56+00:00): Hello again, snigdhap 7!

I suggest to delete way509828118 and draw using Maxar as the latest imagery.

Happy mapping!
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
archie (2019-10-22 12:03:49+00:00): Hej, skulle du kunna kolla om det här vägavsnittet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/614743467) borde vara med i route-relationen https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7331731. Det finns en lucka i relationen där. Du känner ju till trakten bättre än vad jag gör. Stor tack!
DrJoshua (2019-10-23 17:18:25+00:00): Tack för tipset! Kollar på’t!
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
MKnight (2019-02-21 09:55:41+00:00): Moin, 
Du hast hier ein Gebäude zu viel gelöscht, ich habe es in #67423112 korrigiert.
volker26 (2019-02-23 12:54:49+00:00): Danke, ich versuche als Teilzeit-Mapper das Tagging so hinzubekomen, dass unser Haus einigermassen korrekt bei osmbuildings angezeigt wird. Dann werde ich mich mal iterativ an das gewünschte Ergebnis heranarbeiten.
MKnight (2019-02-23 17:59:13+00:00): Moin,
ich habe noch ein paar Korrekturen gemacht, sollte zeitnah vernünftig gerendert werden.

Ich persönlich finde f4map schöner, ist aber auch noch nicht komplett neu gerendert:
https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=52.26303&lon=10.51830&zoom=19.4&tilt=37&rotation=-130
MKnight (2019-02-23 18:00:02+00:00): arr, ich meinte: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=52.2630295&lon=10.5190923&zoom=18&camera.theta=42.726&camera.phi=-2.578
volker26 (2019-02-25 15:30:04+00:00): Super, das Ergebnis sieht schon recht gut aus. Was musstest du noch korrigieren?
osmbuildings rendert das Dach des Hinterhauses gar nicht, f4map zeigt dass ich noch was aendern muss.
Hast du eine Idee wie ich die Durchfahrt zum Innenhof bauen kann?
MKnight (2019-02-25 17:10:31+00:00): f4map hat keine aktuellen Daten, also abwarten.

der Tunnel muss building_passage sein.
Wird aber glaub noch nirgends gerendert.

Alternativ kannst Du es mit building:min_height und/oder building:min_level komplett in 3D modellieren; Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/387329712 vs: https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.0029016&lon=11.3627631&zoom=21&camera.theta=60.703&camera.phi=-76.203
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 14:19:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
adjuva (2019-03-01 22:13:54+00:00): Ich denke, die Angabe der Fachgebiete im Schlüssel 'description' ist ok. Ich habe aber den werblichen Charakter aus dem Text entfernt.
mavl (2019-02-21 15:36:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. OpenStreetMap - это карта реальных объектов. В то же время вы добавляете несуществующие объекты (например, заборы, сельскохозяйственные поля, дачные участки). Также вы удаляли с карты правильные объекты, меняли правильные статусы дорог на неправильные, допускали геометрические ошибки (например, дорожка для пешеходов и здание имели общие точки или превращали правильные прямоугольные здания в непрямоугольные).  
Поэтому я не считаю ваш вклад в редактирование карты Сосновки полезным (возможно, что ваш вклад в других местах также неполезен). Подозреваю, что вы не посещали это место. В связи с этим, я отменю все сделанные вами изменения в Сосновке.  
Лучший способ помочь проекту OpenStreetMap это редактировать карту тех мест, которые вы знаете.
EkaterinaV (2019-02-22 04:38:51+00:00): Здравствуйте! Ну может в части геометрии мне не хватает опыта, но по всему остальному - все достоверное!
mavl (2019-02-22 16:08:44+00:00): К сожалению, не всё в ваших правках достоверно. Как я понял вы рассматриваете спутниковый снимок и пытаетесь что-то там разгадать. Но разгадывать снимки не нужно. Снимки не основной источник, а дополнительный. Основной источник - это ваше знание местности. Например, вы знаете, что в этом месте находится лес. Его границы вы можете обвести по снимку. Но если вы не знаете, что показано на снимке, то и угадывать не нужно. Так у вас получилось с сельскохозяйственным полем возле школы. Там нет поля. Там просто земля вытоптана.
aceman444 (2019-02-22 23:28:32+00:00): Prosim nezadavajte do "name:en" fiktivne anglicke nazvy, ktore oficialne neexistuju. Dakujem
aceman444 (2019-02-22 23:30:01+00:00): Typ paliva 'LPG' sa nezdava do nazvu cerpacej stanice. Spravna znacka fuel:lpg=yes tam uz bola.
filip777 (2019-02-24 21:06:13+00:00): ok
zors1843 (2019-02-21 11:41:13+00:00): Shouldn't it be :
oneway:bicycle=no ?
Bailijun (2019-02-23 10:40:11+00:00): Yes, thank you!
Fra00 (2019-02-24 11:55:16+00:00): Satellite maps not up to date
andygol (2019-02-24 13:16:15+00:00): Fra00, oh sorry.  It's possible to face outdated imagery from time to time. May I ask you to submit several GPS-tracks for this area along with Mapillary or OpenStreetCam sequences to avoid other mappers to do the same mistakes as I did. And if you have the opportunity to share a fresh aerial photo of this area then upload it to https://openaerialmap.org.
wambacher (2019-02-22 10:49:16+00:00): Hi, don't change admin_levels of boundaries, especially nothing to "2". 

Has been fixed.
Dave Venables (2019-02-22 13:12:36+00:00): Actually last Saturday in the month and the day before the last Saturday (not necessarily the last Friday if the month ends on a Friday). Syntax for this beats me as does that for the last Saturday before Christmas.
Discostu36 (2019-02-21 13:06:19+00:00): Warum? Das building= Tag soll bei Schiffen nicht benutz werden, siehe Wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic%3Dship#.C3.84hnliche_tags
Fischkopp0815 (2019-02-21 13:40:53+00:00): Das ist mir bekannt. Das building=ship  war aber vor meiner Löschung vorhanden, ich habe also den alten Zustand bezüglich building=ship wiederhergstellt vorhanden. Wegen der Löschung kamen Beschwerden bei mir an, jetzt gefällt dir der Ursprungszustand nicht. Das Thema ist eben umstritten. Die einen wollen die reine Lehre, die anderen etwas Tagging für den Renderer.
Supaplex (2019-02-21 15:29:56+00:00): 不好意思，這在馬路中央，請問是在北邊嗎?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67423943
starsep (2021-07-20 21:55:33+00:00): I've noticed that you changed translated names all to "Stadion Narodowy". According to your changeset "Double stadium name not allowed." - why not?
Current state makes no sense to me. If indeed for some reason stadium shouldn't have multiple names then why not just remove extra name:* which all contain duplicated Polish name?
RicoElectrico (2019-02-23 11:56:14+00:00): https://www.trojmiasto.pl/wiadomosci/Pomnik-ks-Jankowskiego-wrocil-na-miejsce-n132105.html

I co teraz? ;)
eggie (2019-02-21 11:22:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SuleymanAkgol (2019-02-21 18:16:23+00:00): Bedankt!
EneaSuper (2019-02-21 17:08:11+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che hai dimenticato la maiuscola nella parola "via".
eggie (2019-02-21 11:29:25+00:00): Dag Suleyman. Netjes gedaan...maar....in OSM Nederland maken we niet zelf adressen aan. We taggen bij op de bestaande adresnodes. Verder zij alle gebouwen import vanuit het Kadaster. Wanneer een gebouw is verbouwd is kun je het opnieuw laten importeren via he OSM forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import ..
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 

Doe je dat zelf? 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-21 11:37:36+00:00): Het westelijke gebouw is niet helemaal gesloten en zal straks dus niet renderen.. Ik zal het voorlopig herstellen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-02-21 11:45:53+00:00): Denk dat een import even geen zin heeft, want de gegevens van het kadaster spreken elkaar ook tegen. Zou het maar zo laten.
Westelijke gebouw is hersteld. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-02-21 11:47:13+00:00): Dit was je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67424920
eggie (2019-02-21 11:55:42+00:00): Dag rodborst.. Alle begin is lastig. Je pad eindigt aan de no kant op de outer van het bosgebied, maar hort alleen een verbinding met die track te hebben.
Even de node losmaken met G. De track ok lsleggen en dan weer alles vastmaken zonder bos met toets M.
Dit is je edit.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67425246
Doe je het zelf
Eggie
eggie (2019-02-21 11:56:38+00:00): ... en bij mij kan m'n toetsenbord m'n typsnelheid niet bijhouden zie ik..
eggie (2019-02-21 12:33:37+00:00): Er staat ook nog aan de zuidkant een note=unfinished.. Die zal er nu afkunnen?
eggie (2019-02-21 11:30:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-02-21 11:34:17+00:00): Dag  MamdouhOmar.. Wanneer de gebouwen zijn gesloopt kun je ook de adresnodes weghalen. Doe je dat zelf?

MVG,
Eggie
Marych_ (2019-02-22 09:50:28+00:00): ESavdo - занимает все здание?
Ds5rUy (2019-04-07 09:45:18+00:00): Don't know how many other ways you've vandalized like this, but the data is incorrect now.

The lanes tag counts only full sized lanes, of which there are 3 here.

The :lanes suffix tags includes all lanes, including bicycle ways, which is why there are 4 lanes described in the :lanes suffix tags, but the lanes tag was saying 3
miroslavuzice87 (2019-04-15 06:24:38+00:00): Hi  Ds5rUy. Thank you for pointing out to me this problem. I was not sure if this should be changed, but I found on the forums that the bike path should not be counted as a lane, but evidently it should. Thanks for fixing it and sorry for my mistake.
Ds5rUy (2019-04-15 13:43:27+00:00): Specifically, bike lanes are not counted in the lanes tag, which counts full sized vehicle lanes.

But they are shown as separate lanes in the different :lanes suffix tags, which are not limited to full sized  vehicle lanes.
RafalR (2019-02-27 09:20:47+00:00): Jestem w trakcie poprawiania danych w okolicy którą edytowałeś. Czy jesteś pewien że w tym miejscu powinno być tak jak jest - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2436605214. Wydaje mi się że tu jest brama i dojazd do parkingu na południe od węzła
B_KSL (2019-02-27 11:27:01+00:00): Nie, nie jestem pewien. Mało tego, wygląda na to, że masz rację. Ta highway=service na północ od bramy kończyła się przed bramą. Nie było żadnego połączenia z parkingiem. Dopiero teraz widzę, że nie ma innej możliwości żeby na niego wjechać. Kolega LafarM  nie dorzucił bramy i dojazdu do parkingu, a kolega Radkitt pociągnął płot bez żadnej w nim przerwy. Cień na zdjęciu też sugerował, że jest tam jakaś bariera i żadnego połączenia nie tylko z parkingiem ale i choćby z chodnikiem tuż za płotem. Jak się nijak nie da przejść z drogi na chodnik (bo jest płot) to noexit wydawał się konieczny. Nie mam pojęcia jak to w rzeczywistości wygląda, bazuję jedynie na zdjęciach i na tym co mogę wymyśleć patrząc na tagowanie innych (czasem na szybko, bez wielkiego zagłębiania się w temat). Teraz widzę, że nie tylko jeden parking jest nieosiągalny. Wypadałoby dodać bramę, drogę przez najbliższy parking aż do następnego, jeszcze jedną bramę i drugi parking na pd-ws od pierwszego. Chcesz to poprawić czy mam ja? Tak czy inaczej dzięki za konstruktywną uwagę.
juminet (2019-02-22 19:54:42+00:00): Bonjour GamelleTrophy,

Je me suis permis de modifier cette édition (crfr changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67478134). En effet, au lieu d'ajouter un polygone de forêt au-dessus d'une forêt existante, il vaut mieux l'ajouter en tant que "inner" d'une relation multipolygone. C'est un peu technique, mais je vous invite à regarder au wiki pour cela. En outre, généralement en Belgique on préfère "landuse=forest" à "natural=wood". 

Sinon bravo pour votre travail sur la zone et bonne chance pour la carto détaillé en fonction du type de forêt ;-)

Happy mapping, 
juminet
Tomas Straupis (2019-02-21 14:40:49+00:00): Privažiavimas prie namo yra highway=service, kažkur miške gali būti highway=track, bet tikrai ne highway=residential.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-02-21 21:55:25+00:00): edição revertida. a toponímia mudou
Kovoschiz (2019-03-04 12:50:48+00:00): The end Rumsey Street Flyover isn't defined this way. Refer to IEC western end. It's not a `_link`.
Kovoschiz (2019-03-04 12:51:21+00:00): And https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664762490.
Kovoschiz (2019-03-04 13:03:35+00:00): Sorry, disregard, mixed up two changesets.
flohoff (2019-02-22 17:55:35+00:00): Moin,
sind die neuen Fußwege wirklich reine Fußwege oder darf ich da auch mit dem Fahrrad durch? Im moment sind das ja reine Fußwege.

Flo
Carto'Cité (2019-02-28 08:17:56+00:00): Bonjour Yondas,
Je remarque que ce changeset comprend de nombreuses contributions inappropriées. Sans rentrer dans un long détail, les principaux problèmes sont la suppression de routes remplacées par de nouvelles routes avec des données moins complètes ; cette pratique est à éviter le plus possible car elle supprime l'historique des objets. Ces suppressions ne sont pas justifiées. Tu as aussi ajouté des pistes cyclables là où il n'y a que des bandes cyclables qui étaient déjà décrites (c'est une erreur classique). Reprendre toutes ces modifications demande un trop long travail d'inspection et puisque l'ensemble de ce changeset pose problème, je vais recourir à ce qu'on appel un « revert ». C'est une pratique exceptionnelle et je t'invite à me contacter si tu estime qu'elle est injustifiée et si tu veux faire un point sur les différentes pratiques à faire évoluer. Merci d'avance pour ta compréhension.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
BCNorwich (2019-02-21 15:22:20+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tagged the school area and buildings as disused as per OSM best practice. This will show folk scanning the map the status and hopefully alleviate them being reinstated from aerial imagery.

Regards Bernard