piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pyrog (2021-02-01 16:56:30+00:00): Salut,

Essai de ne mettre que les modifications concernant les établissements de l'EFS dans ton groupe de changement.

Evite aussi d'utiliser les tags addr:* pour les POIs.

Idem pour les POIs sur le bâti. C'est difficile de comprendre les modifications.

SI l'EFS déménage, c'est plus facile de déplacer le noeud avec le POI que d'éditer à nouveau le bâtiment, au risque d'effacer par erreur l'adresse.

Cordialement,

Yves
pyrog (2021-02-01 17:04:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902710884/history

Le tag wikipedia="fr:Établissement français du sang" n'est pas adapté ici.

Ce n'est pas l'EFS, mais un des établissement de l'EFS.

A la façon de Name Suggestion Index, Tu pourrais mettre plutôt brand:wikidata=Q3591543 à tous les EFS de France.

https://nsi.guide/index.html?t=brands&k=healthcare&v=blood_donation&tt=efs

Pour ma part, je pense que le tag brand:wikipedia est redondant par rapport au brand:wikidata.

__
Yves

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3591543
pyrog (2021-02-01 17:08:42+00:00): contact:phone, contact:website : les tags standards n'utilisent pas le préfixe contact ;)

contact:twitter=https://twitter.com/EFS_dondesang

Tout comme contact:facebook, il ne faut pas mettre l'URL complète.

contact:twitter=EFS_dondesang

JOSM ou d'autres outils le rajoutent automatiquement pour générer un lien.
C'est plus lisible, plus facile à maintenir comme ça.
tartiflex (2021-02-03 17:08:33+00:00): Bonjour, je vais faire dans l'ordre pour répondre :

1/ Le POI est mis sur le bati car le bâtiment est entièrement consacré à l'EFS ce qui répond aussi à la question des addr:*. concernant les éventuelles déménagements, il est clair que déplacer un point est toujours plus aisé mais il n'y a rien de rébarbatif à déplacer des tags (je l'ai déjà effectuer sur des POI qui changement de place).

2/ brand ne semble pas le tag le plus adapté car il fait davantage référence à une marque au sens commerciale d'après la page wiki. Le tag operator me semble plus justifié pour un établissement publique à l'image de la police, de la gendarmerie, des pompiers, de la Poste ou des gares SNCF. Je met les 2 tags wikipedia et wikidata car ils ne retournent pas la même page et donc pas la même information.

3/ on peut utiliser les tag contact:phone, etc. Ils sont reconnus sur la page wiki et sur JOSM. Je les utilisent car ils offrent un schéma cohérent avec les tags contact:twitter, etc. contact:twitter et contact:facebook peuvent supporter les 2 approches (lien complet ou nom de compte) mais j'ai quand même changé contact:twitter pour le nom du compte uniquement.

Cordialement
ivanbranco (2021-02-03 09:45:51+00:00): Hi, 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902711190

what are this tags?
Andrew=Mikolajski
Pflanzenschnitt=/
98Ujm (2021-02-03 16:00:37+00:00): Sorry, I pasted this from my clipboard by accident! Thanks for letting me know!
Labo_TREE (2021-02-02 12:00:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Très bonne cartographie, bravo ! Vous pouvez rendre un bâtiment carré (ils le sont la plupart du temps) par un clic droit sur la forme. Bonne suite sur OSM !
Futur3r (2021-02-01 16:35:52+00:00): Salut, disused:* est documenté dans le wiki en tant que préfixe de cycle de vie que closed:*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Pr%C3%A9fixe_cycle_de_vie#Exemples
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98521255
tartiflex (2021-02-03 17:12:03+00:00): Bonjour, en effet c'est corrigé. Merci
Labo_TREE (2021-02-02 12:11:04+00:00): Bonjour,
Très bonne cartographie, bravo ! Le cimetière existait déjà, j'ai donc corrigé. OSM est un projet qui vient d'Angleterre, il n'aime pas les virgules. J'ai donc mis un point sur la hauteur de la haie. Bonne suite sur OSM !
Labo_TREE (2021-02-02 12:14:07+00:00): Bonjour, Très bonne cartographie, bravo ! Les parkings sont souvent carrés, vous pouvez le faire par un simple clic droit sur la forme. Bonne suite sur OSM !
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-09-23 15:33:16+00:00): removido
Labo_TREE (2021-02-02 12:15:45+00:00): Bonjour, Félicitations pour cette excellente cartographie et pour votre travail de recherche sur les objets peu courants comme les machines distributrices de pain. Bonne suite sur OSM !
SekeRob (2021-02-01 16:48:18+00:00): There I see on TI service:bicycle:sales with > 500 uses https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=service:bicycle:sales and my issue reports never flagging this as deprecated. With now 6 months, then 2 months actual experience on OSM the 'fix' without telling what was 'fixed' is really popular around here.
For mobile phone numbers there is a phone:mobile or contact:mobile tag, I prefer former. Not seen 2 numbers being squeezed into a single field.
BTW that unrelated bike rental shop still has no name after your intervention.
cheers
pippo6 (2021-02-05 20:06:33+00:00): An undocumented tag with only 500 uses and identical meaning to a documented and community-approved tag has a negligible chance of being understood by data consumers and is generally evaluated case-by-case (never in bulk/mechanically) for replacement.

; is a popular separator for tags requiring multiple values https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator
phone=* even has an explicit provision https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Parsing_phone_numbers
pippo6 (2021-02-05 20:20:38+00:00): Generally one looks up tags on the wiki and comparing with what's on the map is an invaluable exercise.

- for phone:mobile I cannot find it on the wiki and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Support_for_multiple_countries suggests it NOT for a mobile phone but for a non-community-approved ("This hasn't been voted and is just a documentation of use") phone-network-specific usage
- contact:mobile is discouraged in favor of contact:phone in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact#Contact
eggie (2021-02-01 16:31:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-02-01 16:30:39+00:00): Dag Jan.. Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt mij oke. Gereed is het hier nog niet zo te zien. 
Tip: Je kunt ook https://satellietdataportaal.nl/ gebruiken voor de laatste stand van zaken.
MVG
eggie
JanTerpstra (2021-02-01 21:15:03+00:00): Actueel? Ik ben vrijdag op de bouw geweest.
eggie (2021-02-01 21:22:21+00:00): Maar was je bedoeling om de wegen als gereed om re taggen?... Dat is nog niet gebeurd.  Ze staan nog gewoon op construction.
Dit zijn je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=98522159

MVG
eggie
ycool (2021-02-01 16:12:07+00:00): Fast! Too fast!
ycool (2021-02-01 16:12:48+00:00): Only minutes after Tom Scott published a video on Torpenhow Hill, and it is already here
mfbehrens (2021-02-01 16:18:43+00:00): That's of course the first question you ask yourself: Is this thing also in OSM ;)
GoodClover (2021-02-01 16:19:44+00:00): Should we add `alt_name=Hill Hill Hill Hill`? 😆
mfbehrens (2021-02-01 16:23:10+00:00): Go for it. I am sure that this is incorrect, but sometimes mappers are also allowed to have fun 😆
szydzio (2022-09-05 12:33:14+00:00): Hej! Czy te obszary są jeszcze do czegoś potrzebne? => https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902720552 + https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902720551 . Z tego co widzę ta relacja: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12262560 została już usunięta...
rivermont (2021-02-03 02:07:28+00:00): There was already a fire station, why did you add another one? I've removed the duplicate
Amegaz (2021-02-05 22:06:51+00:00): Hi Berhard,
you fixing Osmose and nothing is marked in osmcha? What have you fixed and why goes this update over several countries?

Best regards 
Amegaz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98523338
mariotomo (2021-02-01 22:28:05+00:00): hola.  gracias por apoyar el mapa.  acuérdate que aquí es un proyecto de grupo, y habrá maperos revisando.  es útil presentar las ediciones con un verbo de acción y un objeto, como en https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98490166
SafetyIng (2021-02-01 17:26:35+00:00): Sind die Bahnschienen im Norden nicht schon fertig gestellt?
tvbrene (2021-02-01 18:12:25+00:00): Die Schienen liegen schon, aber ob die wirklich vollständig fertig gestellt sind weiß ich nicht. Ist aber auch eine eher theoretische Diskussion, da vor dem Anschluss an den Bestand keine Bahnen fahren können, ist es nicht so wichtig, wie die Schienen zur Zeit getaggt sind.
Cristoffs (2021-02-05 00:32:08+00:00): Nazwy zmieniamy zgodnie ze stanem faktycznym. Proszę nie rób więcej takich zmian.
stefanct (2021-02-01 21:18:25+00:00): You did not only add it, you also invented it apparently. This is not OK - neither here nor in the Wikidata project.
Jakka (2021-02-02 08:25:25+00:00): attention votre test pas réusit il fout pas sauve garde...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902727503
johnnyw03 (2021-06-02 23:59:54+00:00): Hey, just an small thing but we generally don't separately map turning lanes unless they are physically separated from the main road. There are tags for numbers of lanes that you can use instead.
eggie (2021-02-01 19:30:56+00:00): Dag Eddy,
Je zou evt. de source=3dshapes (oude bron klopt niet meer)  kunnen vervangen door source=local knowledge of pdok oid.
MVG
eggie
Edmundus (2021-02-01 20:30:40+00:00): Ik weet eigenlijk niet goed wat "source=3dshapes" betekent. ik dacht dat dat slaat op een polynoom. Maar begrijp ik na dat het gaat over de belangrijkste bron waarop je je wijzigingen baseert?

Zojuist nog een stukje grasveld (eigen waarneming) ingetekend. Later deze week ga ik het water beter intekenen m.b.v. AHN3.
Groet van Eddy.
eggie (2021-02-01 20:36:11+00:00): Het 3dshapes-project  was een import jaren geleden ..   Veel is achterhaald. 
Daarvoor was de kaart grotendeels wit. 
Je kunt het rustig aanpassen.
Succes verder
eggie
Jrachi (2025-03-15 18:51:39+00:00): Ciao.
Anche qui stai usando i tag in modo errato.
Usa state=closed se non vuoi cancellare la relazione.

Ivo
micheleOSM3 (2025-03-16 17:35:47+00:00): Hai ragione, "abandoned:route=hiking" è inadeguato, l'ho rimosso.
Riguardo a "state=closed", quello che leggo nel wiki è che è deprecated, mentre usando taginfo non sembra usato.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-01 20:50:46+00:00): A https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223139513#map=17/53.12012/15.88079&layers=N jest jednokierunkowa?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-01 20:50:56+00:00): I dzięki za poprawę!
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-01 20:52:56+00:00): Thanks!
user_5359 (2022-01-15 08:12:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question: Is the iamge a local stored image?
Did you know the pages https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key%3Amaxlength, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key%3Ahazard

Please check my correction.
user_5359 (2022-01-15 08:18:43+00:00): I moved the node to the highway. See https://www.osm.org/node/152513889
Allison P (2021-02-01 17:04:49+00:00): When adding addresses in Garden City and 83714 in general, I forgot to check existing addresses and remove duplicates.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-25 09:31:12+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760244717/history has amenity = temple that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by amenity=temple? It seem to be not documented value and it seems to be a duplicate of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship.

If you used it intentionally instead of amenity=place_of_worship - then what is the difference here?
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-02 06:51:06+00:00): Kaune nėra adreso Žemaičių 125A.
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-02 06:52:47+00:00): Šitam pakeitime skylėtasis iD kažką sugadino su pastatais. Atsirado vieno kelio ryšys pastatams su nekorektišai sukombinuotu ir dubliuotu namo numeriu 11;9.
MapsInQuestion (2021-02-02 07:17:44+00:00): Aš tai irgi pastebėjau, bet pasak https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Buildings_with_multiple_house_numbers viskas yra gerai. Aš dar pridėjau adresų taškus, kad rodytų adresus atskirai.
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-02 07:39:10+00:00): Wiki informacija nereikia aklai pasitikėti, ten daug visokių nesąmonių prirašyta. :-)
Jei kyla klausimų - geriausia klausti bendrame forume - talk-lt, arba asmeniškai kokio pažįstamo žymėtojo (aš irgi tinku).
Dubliuoti numeriai (ir šiaip žymos) teoriškai galimos, bet praktiškai niekur nepanaudojamos (per daug vargo dėl mažos naudos).
O tuo labiau, kad tie patys adresai buvo įvesti ir antrą kartą kaip taškai. OSM yra taisyklė, kad „vienas objektas gyvenime - vienas objektas OSM'e“.
Dar vienas dalykas: Kauno adresai jau prieš kelis mėnesius suimportuoti iš Registrų centro, tai gali būti nebent adresų pasikeitimai per tuos kelis mėnesius, visa kita turi būti gerai.
Kovoschiz (2021-02-02 14:52:03+00:00): Again, please don't add descriptors on `name=`. They are `description=`. EVA is not a name. This is Tagging For Renderer. Some other map data appears to do this because they are based on paper maps, or have limited functionality. It will only be a name if it has proper, eg "Club Le Pont". Smething like "Le Pont Clubhouse" would be objectionable if it is not used formally, ie only "Clubhouse" is shown on signs.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-02 08:55:09+00:00): Ciao. Se il parcheggio è riservato ai clienti devi usare access=customers (non access=destination). Non aggiungere i numeri civici agli edifici. In Italia, i numeri civici sono associati agli ingressi. Posiziona quindi un nodo in corrispondenza dell'ingresso dove si trova la targhetta ed etichettalo opportunamente. Il campo addr:city deve contenere il nome del Comune, quindi Chiaverano. Inoltre, non usare le immagini satellitari di Bing perché non sono ben allineate. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98527044
LITO 75 (2021-02-02 12:26:23+00:00): Ciao, in un primo momento ho pensato anche io di usare il tag customer ma poi ho visto nella documentazione (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:access) che è ancora provvisorio e ho quindi optato per il più usato destination. Non posso omettere il numero civico nell' indirizzo del ristorante! se pensi che vada aggiunto un nodo fai pure. Anche io sono un fan Esri  ma in QUESTO caso l'allineamento (valutate le mappature circostanti) mi sembrava più corretto quello di bing. Ciao!
Andrea Musuruane (2021-02-02 13:23:33+00:00): Ciao. Purtroppo la dicitura "Aggiunto di recente con applicabilità in discussione" è lì da quando è stata creata la pagina nel 2011 e non è mai stata aggiornata. Bisognerebbe consultare la versione in inglese ma capisco che questo non facilita la partecipazione. Per specificare l'indirizzo del ristorante puoi seguire il Bremen Schema: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema In pratica puoi usare i tag contact:housenumber, contact:street, ... ecc in modo analogo ai corrispondenti tag addr:* Ciao, Andrea
LITO 75 (2021-02-02 22:23:23+00:00): ok, ne terrò conto nei futuri inserimenti: qui si tratta di un unico edificio/n°civico/proprietario. Non essendo possibili inserimenti multipli non si possono creare ambiguità.Ciao!
Geofreund1 (2021-10-20 19:01:20+00:00): Hallo WUSCH1463,
der Mapillary Verweis funktioniert bei mir nicht. Könntest du mal erklären, was man mit dieser kryptischen Angabe anfängt?
Danke
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-10-21 06:24:44+00:00): Hallo,

es handelt sich um die Kennziffer aus der Naturdenkmalliste (https://www.landkreis-fulda.de/fileadmin/intern/politische_gremien/Antraege_KT/2010/2010-06-07/TOP_II.22_-_BERICHT_CWE_-_Naturdenkmale.pdf). ref ist der richtige Tag dafür.

Gruß Roger Wilco
Geofreund1 (2021-10-21 08:18:28+00:00): Danke für die Info. Ich habe inzwischen den sog. Natureg Viewer gefunden:
https://natureg.hessen.de/mapapps/resources/apps/natureg/index.html?lang=de
Was ich mich allerdings frage: dürfen diese Informationen überhaupt für OSM genutzt werden?
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-10-21 08:31:12+00:00): Grundsätzlich nicht, außer es gibt eine gesonderte Freigabe für OSM.

Was aber grundsätzlich genutzt werden darf sind Daten aus den amtlichen Bekanntmachungen.
Geofreund1 (2021-10-21 08:33:38+00:00): ... und dazu gehören hoffentlich auch die numerischen Kennzeichnungen der Naturdenkmale?
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-10-21 09:05:04+00:00): Ja, siehe hier: https://www.landkreis-fulda.de/fileadmin/intern/politische_gremien/Antraege_KT/2010/2010-06-07/TOP_II.22_-_BERICHT_CWE_-_Naturdenkmale.pdf
Fypsi (2021-02-01 18:12:19+00:00): Please close https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98523338 - it is very large.
tux67 (2021-02-02 07:39:34+00:00): Hi,
sollte das Gelände denn nicht jetzt einen anderen Landuse bekommen? Welche Quelle aus dem "Internet" hattest du denn? Vielleicht steht da auch was es jetzt ist.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98527409
muerkelmann (2021-02-02 20:11:30+00:00): Hi Tux67,
das Gelände ist seit 2000 keine Kaserne mehr und verrottet seitdem. Letzter Google-Treffer zu 'Niederrheinkaserne'  in der RP aus 2016 sagt, man hat für das Gelände noch keine Nachnutzung. Das macht es schwer, einen passenderen 'landuse' dafür zu finden. Aber militärisch ist es echt nicht mehr und es wunderte mich, dass das seit Jahren niemand geändert hat. Mir fiel daher nur ein Lifecycle-prefix ein.
Gruß
Muerkelmann
tux67 (2021-02-02 20:39:27+00:00): Danke fürs Feedback. Das die schon lange leersteht wusste ich, aber die Hoffnung war das es da News gäbe. 
Ich hatte auch gedacht, das das Gelände weiterhin nicht betretbar ist.
Scheint ja das mit dem lifecycle tag die beste Lösung.
Vielleicht noch mit fixme dran

Gruß tux67
Kovoschiz (2021-02-02 14:45:34+00:00): 1. Please don't add descriptors on `name=`. They are `description=`. EVA is not a name. This is Tagging For Renderer. Some other map data appears to do this because they are based on paper maps, or have limited functionality. `motor_vehicle:conditional=designated @ (emergency)` + `parking:lane:both=fire_lane` makes it functional. In this case `service=emergency_access` can be debatable, since it has other functions. 
2. Don't draw separate lines for a mini-roundabout. Only do this for normal roundabouts with physical separation island in the center
SomeoneElse (2021-10-15 13:16:58+00:00): Just wondered - are relations 1239778, 1240000 and 1240001 essentially the same thing?  They're all called "Dublin Mountains Way Hellfire & Massey Spur" or something like it.
Best Regards,
Andy
obyrnegps (2021-10-16 21:43:10+00:00): They were once all part of the Dublin Mountains Way(DMW) but when the National Trails Office did not like a spur on a long distance route, several sections were renamed to distinguish it from the DMW.  One was labelled the Massey Spur and the other the Hellfire spur.  When they were later linked a composite label was applied, we have history and a succession of name changes here for what is a spur from the DMW through Massey estate and Hellfire wood
obyrnegps (2021-10-17 16:18:55+00:00): The 3 relations at this stage could all be renamed as "Massey and Hellfire spur from Dublin Mountains Way" so its clear it is not part of the Dublin Mountains Way and goes through both Massey and Hellfire woods
tomhukins (2021-07-13 13:51:16+00:00): Hi, I noticed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/243780744 was accidentally tagged as a tree in the middle of Moor Lane.  I've removed the tree tags from it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107914696
Jehsom (2021-02-01 19:16:34+00:00): Used the following map with mapwarper to trace trails: http://nebula.wsimg.com/8a7bff28df6a6de35bc6adf4b2a10d6e?AccessKeyId=AE349E9C15359B9EF2D0&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
ovruni (2021-02-01 19:27:36+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado un parque y en el conjunto de cambios se menciona que es parte del "plan nuevo de arborizacion". Sin embargo desde las diferentes imágenes aéreas con las que cuenta el proyecto OSM, entre ellas la mas actual de Maxar no parece visualizarse dicho parque, de tal forma que permita la verificabilidad [0] en OSM. ¿Este parque se encuentra construido o todavía esta por construirse a futuro como parte de un plan? La pregunta va porque en OSM solamente ingresamos elementos que existen sobre el terreno. En caso el parque ya exista, existe algún lugar que permita ver la existencia del mismo de tal forma que permita la verificabilidad.

Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad
Kovoschiz (2021-02-02 15:01:47+00:00): What happened to the skybridge?
eggie (2021-02-01 19:25:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-02-02 16:35:24+00:00): Hallo bpm54,

für Polizeiausbildungsstätten bitte nicht amenity=police verwenden sondern stattdessen police=academy. Zumindest sollte police=academy ergänzt werden, um sie von regulären Polizeidienststellen unterscheiden zu können.

Siehe hierzu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpolice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:police%3Dacademy

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
ivanbranco (2021-02-04 11:29:15+00:00): Hi,

you used many invalid tags on the hotel, you can check the wiki for the right ones. Can you fix them?
Kovoschiz (2021-02-02 14:42:08+00:00): Please don't add descriptors on `name=`. They are `description=`, not a name. You should add `leisure=track` + `sport=running`
Kovoschiz (2021-02-02 14:45:54+00:00): to make it work
marc__marc (2021-02-27 13:30:26+00:00): Bonjour,
que veux-dire précisement "medical aids" ?
parce qu'on se doute bien qu'une pharmacie est une aide médicale :)
Cordialement,
Marc
isidor (2021-02-01 19:20:50+00:00): Ahoj,
sledujem už dlhšie, že posúvaš množstvo objektov zrejme na základe satelitných či leteckých snímkov, avšak tieto sú v zásade vždy posunuté oproti realite, občas aj o niekoľko metrov! Väčšina Košíc je zmapovaná podľa katastrálnej mapy, ktorá je najpresnejším zdrojom, aký máme. Takže posúvať prosím s rozmyslom a určite nie tam, kde je source=kapor2 alebo kataster. Ďakujem.
Liqid1010 (2021-02-01 19:24:05+00:00): V poslednej dobe sa stále snažím podľa katastrálnych snímkov zarovnávať všetko čo robím, dúfam, že to je v poriadku, tiež keď posúvam tak aj pridávam alebo spresňujem dáta, nie iba posúvam.
*Martin* (2021-02-02 19:23:28+00:00): Katastralna mapa (kapor2) je v KE myslim celkom OK, v mensich obciach presnost kolise. Len pripomeniem, ze je mozne pouzit aj imagery Ortofotomozaika SR, ktore su presne skrz cele slovensko (nepresnost je tusim mensia ako meter). Vysoke budovy je potom samozrejme nutne mapovat podla podorysu (alebo obkreslit strechu a posunut na podorys).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-18 21:44:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106610390 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some suspected vandalism in Bosnia (2nd attempt, 1st was too drastic)
!bm (2021-02-01 19:22:29+00:00): sourec+= Geoportal Berlin / ALKIS Berlin - Gebäude; Geoportal Berlin / Adressen Berlin; Geoportal Berlin / Berlin Zoom
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98530716
Mike Baggaley (2021-03-03 18:49:54+00:00): Hi. In this change a number of ways have been named with what look like references. If these are the public right of way numbers, please move the values to the prow_ref field and delete the names. The name field should only be filled with a proper noun.

Cheers,
Mike
ovruni (2021-02-01 19:41:35+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han ingresado vías con la etiqueta "man_made=petroglyph", sin embargo la etiqueta para petroglifos es la etiqueta site_type=petroglyph [0].
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:site_type%3Dpetroglyph