piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-09-05 00:06:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Leigh (2019-09-05 00:41:20+00:00): Ooops - was changeset 68356514
Warin61 (2019-10-06 23:56:44+00:00): By combining the coastline this has made the whole Island a National Park.... 

One section of the coastline is used by the National Park as its boundary... 

Coast line is now in 4 sections. It may be broken to more sections e.g. for use as a beach boundary or other things. 

So now the coastline is a relation.
Warin61 (2019-10-06 23:58:06+00:00): Comment .. 
There is a lot of work to do in NZ.. see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=175.34514&lat=-39.87126&zoom=7
petenz (2019-10-07 00:07:29+00:00): Aah, apologies, will look into getting this changeset reverted.
Warin61 (2019-10-07 04:58:11+00:00): No worries, fixed.
iWowik (2019-10-16 06:46:20+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики, а также вносите адресную информацию.

Обычно ее сложно найти.
Скажите, пожалуйста, а откуда вы ее берете?
mavl (2019-09-05 14:33:23+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, откуда были взяты адресные данные?
mavl (2019-09-05 15:47:36+00:00): Новоалександровка уже обозначена на карте:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1678216179  
  
Вторая не нужна:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6773432015/history
iWowik (2019-11-23 16:33:34+00:00): Здравствуйте, TESShar!
К сожалению вы не ответили на комментарий к этому пакету правок
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о комментариях, поэтому повторю вопрос, который меня тоже интересует
Откуда вы берете адресную информацию?
boopington (2020-05-20 23:58:22+00:00): are these ramps under construction?
user_5359 (2019-09-05 03:55:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node!
user_5359 (2019-09-05 03:57:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
470Vinyl (2019-09-09 15:07:13+00:00): Unsure if this would have posted on OSHM as I kept getting errors after changing the url on JOSM. Hence the test prior to making any additions to it. 

Would this have posted between the time periods I added to OSHM? This change was made with the default URL in JOSM
user_5359 (2019-09-12 15:35:23+00:00): I am unfortunately not an expert on OSHM, but if there is a possible explanation, the matter has been clarified.
viloan (2019-09-05 02:17:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
tguen (2019-09-05 05:50:57+00:00): * McClellan Street
AkuAnakTimur (2022-08-13 04:02:35+00:00): Your taxi friend gets this really wrong. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73990842

It's been probably a few good years, the street name has changed into a new name https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1015130885975165

(your edit was made 5 September 2019, I've personally been there myself December 2016; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44848542)

Just admit you copied stuff already...
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
user_5359 (2019-09-05 03:59:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry.
PerplexingPenguins (2019-09-05 14:22:23+00:00): I've reverted this, as it looks like vandalism, but I have not actually checked on-site
muralito (2019-09-05 22:38:08+00:00): Gracias.

Tene en cuenta que las cosas se mapean una sola vez, o como punto, o como area, pero no ambas. Ej. la escuela te quedo dos veces.
Supaplex (2020-01-02 14:28:23+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
keithonearth (2019-09-05 05:00:09+00:00): In reality the sections of road that are inaccessible to the public are likely to be much longer than this, as border areas are sensitive military areas, with restricted access to the public. But with these tags, I hope that routers will not try to send people across closed crossings.
keithonearth (2019-09-05 05:01:46+00:00): weird. This is tagged as part of #osmnepal, but is far from Nepal.
Manoj Thapa (2019-09-11 04:46:06+00:00): We from Nepal are validating and supervising the mapping work.
Nurum (2019-09-06 22:45:00+00:00): Ich wusste nicht, dass die Straße als "Tainer Straße" ausgeschildert ist. Tut mir leid, dass ich dir extra Arbeit gemacht habe.

Kann es sein, dass die Wegsegmente
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533312248 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243258467 auch noch unbenannt werden müssen, oder ist die Straße mit zwei verschiedenen Schreibweisen ausgeschildert?

Freundliche Grüße
Nurum
mavl (2019-09-05 15:51:21+00:00): Здравствуйте. Напишите, пожалуйста, откуда были взяты адресные данные?
iWowik (2019-11-23 16:29:02+00:00): Здравствуйте, Gelia!
К сожалению вы не ответили на комментарий ни к этому пакету правок, ни к https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74107554
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о комментариях, поэтому повторю вопрос, который меня тоже интересует
Откуда вы берете адресную информацию?
WalkerB (2019-09-30 20:30:15+00:00): Salaam Walaikum Sharifullah.  Welcome back!

Thank you for adding the roads to the map!  I see you're using Bing Imagery, you may want to use Maxar Imagery.  It is better.  You can change this by selecting "Background Settings" on the right side of the screen and selecting "Maxar Premium".
literan (2019-09-05 11:17:52+00:00): а этот дублер точно открыли? странно получилось - съезд из Бесед пересекает его
vylekzhanin (2019-09-05 15:16:23+00:00): Да, сейчас специально по внешке МКАД проехал по этому дублёру. Всё съезды только на дублёр, поправлю попозже. Внутренний дублёр не открыт.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
TheNet1996 (2019-09-05 11:25:00+00:00): Hi,
the road goes through the house nr. 28???
BR
Mike
tux67 (2019-09-05 14:03:27+00:00): @Mike - I guess a rhetoric question - highway obviously needs to be more to the east . 
@ansukess - I guess you have a supervisor to check with.
kreuzschnabel (2019-09-05 15:32:48+00:00): Hi ansukess, please keep in mind that most aerial images show considerable lateral offset so you always need to align the imagery (to GPX traces, or objects already given) before copying from it. Newly drawn objects should always fit into the existing data.
ansukess (2019-09-06 10:38:27+00:00): Hi Mike,

Thanks for looking into my edit. It was an honest mistake and I have understood the severity. I had a discussion with my team and now I am aware of the imagery offset feature. I will take this as a learning and will be more careful going forward. I have improved the edit (#74167449). Let me know in case you have any further suggestion.

@tux67 – I had a word with my manager and have realized the mistake. I will be diligent going forward. Thanks for looking into it. Let me know in case you any further suggestions.

@kreuzschnabel – I have been made aware of this by my team and I have taken this as a learning. Let me know in case you have any suggestions

Regards
ansukess
TheNet1996 (2019-09-06 12:29:55+00:00): Hi ansukess,

please make a recheck of the railway in the area which you have edited. The railway tracks are no more in a straight line - it's more a "Z"! Also the Street "Stadtberger Str" is incorrect now.

In general, i don't understand your edit at all because the access to the church is closed with an barrier.

Do you ever checked the situation on-site with your own eyes?? I think not.


Thanks and regards
Mike
galyanh (2019-09-06 14:08:11+00:00): Hi Mike,
Thanks for noticing this. I have corrected the mistake of our team member. He is new into the system hence this mistake happened. I have had a word with him and have asked him to be extremely cautious while adding the data into OSM. Also, we have initiated a fast paced internal quality review process to look into all his edits. We would be improving all the mistakes as soon as possible! Thanks you for bringing it to our notice. ln case you have any further concerns, please let me know. 
Regards
galyanh
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74114321
gscscnd (2019-09-05 07:23:26+00:00): highway — ważność drogi. surface — nawierzchnia. Zobacz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface i https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=26736.

W przypadku drogi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167938584 najprawdopodobniej powinno być highway=residential. Droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167939938 to raczej tertiary (nie unclassified), ale dobrze by było skorygować typy okolicznych dróg.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:37:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
Jakka (2019-09-05 07:32:38+00:00): ajouter https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722136223 see also https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/2H1qMJSCIJBSlyeT0xMlMw these are taken by .... free of use for osm
lthreva (2019-09-05 07:58:34+00:00): je me suis trompé de tag... 
 je modifie donc de nouveau
Warin61 (2019-09-06 22:16:08+00:00): Deleting way 2952237745 has destroyed the relation for Bluff Beach... 

The coastline is supposed to be the high tide mark. Looking at Bing there is evidence of water at a higher point than you have marked. 

Iluka Beach now exists as - a closed way natural=beach and as a way natural=coastline. 

There needs to be more work done here.
nevw (2019-09-09 05:51:46+00:00): Hi
this OSMI link shows the errors in the relations
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.35602&lat=-29.39723&zoom=13
nqndwc (2019-09-10 00:55:59+00:00): Hi
I have finished attempting to fix the coastline and beaches near Iluka as best I can.  I was a visitor to the area using OSM maps to find my way around and noticed that the coastline of Iluka was scrambled.  I have tried to edit it in a way consistent with the coastline south of the river mouth. 

About 4 years ago I edited the entire coast of Phillip Island in Victoria because the island did not show up in OSM and the Yamba coastline seems to be done the same way as I did Phillip Island.
  
There is now a single coastline way from the centre of the river mouth to the Iluka/Woody Head locality border and a second coastline way round Woody Head.  The coastline ways are members of the mainland, shire and locality relations.

Behind this coastline I have created named closed ways for beaches and rock platforms and connected up access paths to them.  The only orphan way in the area that I can see is the National Park boundary.  I haven't fixed this as I don't have authoritative info as to where it should go.  

I can continue editing the coast north of Woody Head if you want or if you think my coastline edits are wrong let me know and I will roll back all the edits I have made to the coast.
Warin61 (2019-09-10 01:37:46+00:00): Hi,
Not a matter of 'what I want' but what you want to map. 

So, map what you want. 
I'll only comment if something gets broken, if it appears untruthful or I think there might be a  better way of doing it.
nevw (2019-09-10 05:33:46+00:00): Hi
osmi found no errors today in the areas and geometry so all that is correct.
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=13&lat=-29.4201&lon=153.3314&item=xxxx&level=1&tags=geom&fixable= also found no geometry errors. 
Looks good apart from the coastline not aligned with the mean high water spring line which is about where the debris line that high tide leaves. That would normally result in the beach area crossing the coastline when I occasionally map a beach.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=coastline
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beach
It can be left for others unless your keen.
There appears not much consistency in how these are mapped in practice.
I would leave the National Park (and other protected areas if any) separate from the coastline and admin boundaries as these have gazetted boundaries that can be checked by someone who has the dataset and/or when the  dataset is updated. It is common to see these boundaries not coincide.
Thanks for all your work in the area. I camped at Woody Head a couple of years ago and found it to be a great place for a holiday.
Cheers.
Bradilos3 (2019-09-13 14:36:13+00:00): schau mal: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1924611
czubi (2019-09-05 09:55:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6772934408
hier ist noch was falsch. ein node kann nicht landuse haben und ausserdem ist Scolz recycling doppelt trenne den adressnode wieder ab und schreiben die infos vom recycling an den landuse  mit dran
czubi (2019-09-05 09:59:57+00:00): Wenn du vorhast dauerhaft was in OSM zu machen versuche dich mal mit JOSM anzufreunden. Eher früher als später.
funkyzitrone (2019-09-05 10:28:35+00:00): Ah, ich glaube, ich kann mir erklären wie das mit dem Landuse auf dem Node passiert ist: dieser ID-Editor bietet mir auf einem Node den Typ Schrottplatz an und trägt dann die ganzen Attribute, welche vermutlich für die Fläche gültig sind, trotzdem mit ein...
abakus_uploader (2019-09-05 22:30:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
FRichard44 (2019-09-09 18:51:31+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour votre contribution.

S'il s'agit d'un rond-joint, il faut plutôt utiliser les attributs "junction=roundabout". Dans ce cas, le "oneway=yes" est à retirer, car implicite.
Si ce rond-point est franchissable (car plat), généralement pour passage des poids-lourd, il faut utiliser un "highway=mini_roundabout".

Vous pouvez trouver la description de ces attributs dans le wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:junction%3Droundabout et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout

Florent
Ernie C (2019-09-05 08:37:50+00:00): Oeps, iets te enthousiast met de area waardoor de parkeerplaats en de kerk weggevallen zijn. Gefixt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74119316
eggie (2019-09-05 09:14:34+00:00): Dag Ernie,
Ziet er netjes uit. 
Aan mp's is kennelijk ook iets veranderd. Voorheen kon je nooit inners die gekoppeld waren apart in een mp relatie zetten. Kennelijk kan het nu wel. 
Gr eggie
mavl (2019-10-25 17:05:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76218999 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3227].
CaptainCrunch (2019-09-24 17:37:15+00:00): Hallo D91596Michael,
ich hab deine Changesets 60903501, 74067931 und 74119199 mit CS 74869989 revertet, weil du alles mögliche nach Bing-Luftbild verschoben hast. Bing liegt nicht richtig, die alte Lage war und ist korrekt. Die Abbiegebeschränkungen und Tags am Parkplatz habe ich nach bestem Wissen beibehalten. Du kannst ja nochmal drüberschauen.
Du hattest früher schonmal das gleiche gemacht. Bitte achte vor dem mappen nach Bing und ganz besonders vor dem verschieben existierender Sachen darauf, dass du nichts verschlechterst. Das nachträglich wieder zu korrigieren ist unnötiger Aufwand.
Viele Grüße,
CptCruch
tastrax (2020-01-01 04:16:37+00:00): Hi redimon - with phone numbers please add the full international codes. There are some great tagging tips in this document https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines
mueschel (2019-09-06 08:40:41+00:00): Hi,
these 200 ways have only foreign tags like:
    Name=Site
    Site_No=69
    id=8
Please have a look and fix this.

Thanks
Jan
Dilancelik (2019-09-05 08:57:39+00:00): also i added roads and classified them, i forgot to writing, sorry! :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74120243
ralley (2019-09-08 20:04:58+00:00): Hi wlecome to OSM and thanks for your edit.  Do you have a verifiable source for your changes?  I ask because you have added a park that does not appear in the Auckland Council park extents data set and appears from aerial imagery to in fact be private land.  Thanks, Rob.
Muren16 (2019-09-08 20:32:41+00:00): Hi rob, you are correct, it is not council owned land, I did not see an option for private park , the area is currently being developed and the neighbouring properties are also having foundation works started soon also for more residential specific applications, I had to add it as a park for a report I needed to print out for the land surveyors and construction consultants
ralley (2019-09-10 04:54:27+00:00): Thanks for responding.  Maybe change leisure=park to landuse=grass?
Muren16 (2019-09-10 05:02:53+00:00): i didnt even know that was an option as it wasnt listed when i clicked the landuse button, i had to search for it before it showed up, thanks i have changed it now, hope that clears up any confusion
ralley (2019-09-10 05:03:45+00:00): Awesome, thanks for that.
mavl (2019-10-25 17:06:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76218999 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3227].
literan (2019-09-05 17:52:32+00:00): по секрету, османд платит биткойны не за количество чейнджсетов, а за количество исправленных объектов. Так что только время теряешь, сохраняясь каждую минуту.
Sowa1980 (2019-09-07 23:31:24+00:00): Как же мне твое ученичество надоело!!!
Ты лучше бы на Вопрос ответил,  что это в заготовках твоих Русские POI
https://habrahabr.ru/company/megafon
Разве это официальный сайт мегафона , что это за пиар хабра или проплаченая реклама?
Буду выпиливать везде, сразу предупреждаю.
Предлагаю убрать из заготовок твоих самому и из базы OSM
literan (2019-09-08 08:03:13+00:00): дурака учить — что мертвого лечить
mavl (2019-09-05 16:18:14+00:00): Здравствуйте. Просто для информации.  
В OpenStreetMap принято указывать полные названия улиц: "улица Хохлова", "Ореховая улица".  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Jonaes (2019-09-05 14:37:51+00:00): Hallo und Herzlich Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!
An deinem Edit sieht alles gut aus, vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.
Falls du noch Fragen hast, kannst du dich gerne an mich oder das OSM-Forum [1] wenden.
Alles Gute und viel Spaß beim Mappen,
Jonaes

[1] https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
dgitto (2020-03-16 14:26:07+00:00): Ciao, il comune di castiglione olona ha la sede municipale (il municipio) nel palazzo che si chiama  "palazzo del comune". poi oltre la sede comunale c'è anche la scuola di canto, e potrebbero esserci cento altre attività all'interno del palazzo (puoi mappare le singole macchinette del caffè). Quindi non va bene che l'edificio in sé si chiami "Palazzo del Comune" e anche "Scuola di Canto". Anche perché, se queste due entità hanno differenti numeri di telefono, website ecc ecc dove mettiamo questi dati?. In questi casi è davvero semplice: si mappa il palazzo nudo e crudo col suo nome proprio ("Palazzo del Comune"). Poi si mappa il municipio come nodo a parte (amenity=townhall e name="Municipio di Castiglione Olona", il suo indirizzo, i suoi contatti ecc). E avanti così con la scuola di musica: un altro nodo col suo indirizzo, contatti, ecc
dgitto (2020-09-26 09:57:00+00:00): dato anche che non rispondi ripristino la situazione precedente
LukeDH (2020-09-26 10:13:41+00:00): Ciao. Ripristina pure la situazione precedente: non mi ricordo neanche di quelle modifiche (ormai non entro più in tali particolari e modifico altre cose). Mi scuso per non aver risposto, ma spesso non mi arrivano le notifiche dei messaggi. Grazie per aver riparato al mio errore
eggie (2019-09-05 10:08:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie