piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tumm1 (2016-10-26 11:22:45+00:00): Hej! Ja, jag tror det. Jag utmärkte det genom Maps.Me, så därför det är kanske inte precis. (också förlot ifall att min svenska är inte perfekt, jag är finländare)
MMN-o (2016-10-26 11:48:15+00:00): Tack för att du märkte ut det! Och oroa dig inte för språket, jag förstår dig väl .)

Jag tittade lite närmare på området och såg att det fanns ett par till fornminnen i närheten. 

T.ex. om man tittar på Ekonomiska Kartan från 50-talet (katalogskyddet har gått ut, så man får kopiera data därifrån): https://maps.openstreetmap.se/#17/64.16590/20.93866 (tryck på lagersymbolen i övre högra hörnet och kryssa i "Ekonomiska kartan").

Markerade ut de andra i alla fall och satte "rätt" taggar (tillsammans med objektsnummer från Riksantikvarieämbetet).


Rekommenderar förövrigt varmt att testa OsmAnd~, till Android så finns det fritt licensierat och gratis i paketsamlingen F-Droid, https://f-droid.org/

Välkommen till kartläggandet! Hoppas du tycker det är kul .)
user_5359 (2016-10-26 19:03:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-26 19:01:26+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
kreuzschnabel (2019-11-22 20:53:47+00:00): Wieso einklich layer=3 für die Brücke? Soweit ich sehe, gehen da keine weiteren Brücken mehr drunter durch, oder wolltest du „Platz lassen“, falls mal eine kommt?
ma-rt-in (2019-11-22 22:16:07+00:00): Hallo erstmal,
da das schon gut 3 Jahre her ist, kann ich dir da keine Antwort liefern.
Ich habe den layer nun angepasst.
vg
user_5359 (2016-10-26 19:00:49+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
DenisCarriere (2016-11-25 20:06:18+00:00): How did this happen? This Wikidata code is for Iran?
samely (2016-11-27 17:48:59+00:00): Hi Denis. I'm not sure how this happened, however, I'll compare values carefully. Thanks for your feedback and fixing it.
mueschel (2016-10-29 18:27:43+00:00): Hi,
when adding tags, please check that there are no spaces in the key. Keys with spaces can not be used by most software.
Jan
utack (2016-10-26 12:09:08+00:00): man_made=works passt hier nicht so wirklich.
Bitte mal bei "office" reinsehen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
Wenn nichts dabei ist was genau drauf passt einfach office=yes nehmen
utack (2016-10-26 12:10:04+00:00): oder company
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dcompany
t_frasch (2016-10-26 12:18:31+00:00): ok. Danke.
RafalR (2016-11-01 07:02:59+00:00): Żabka nie jest typowym sklepem cukierniczym
mavl (2019-01-31 17:01:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
bkil (2016-10-27 20:55:00+00:00): Did they suspend the menu offering? If they did, we should add a note= to mention this fact, because it is still advertised on their website.
AthossO4 (2016-11-12 11:14:20+00:00): I haven't found anything about menu on their website, the 10-15h refers to food delivery
bkil (2016-11-12 13:15:23+00:00): I see. I've added the time to the delivery option then.

If you are living nearby, could you perhaps ask whether they serve a lunch menu as well as you walk by? I recall having eaten a menu there, but it was too long ago to say for sure.
Upendrakarukonda (2016-11-24 06:11:02+00:00): Hello,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You added number of convenience shops with same name. This is not correct way of adding. We are reverting the entire changeset.
To get started with OpenStreetMap, please follow this link http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/. 

Thank you,
Upendra.
dudka (2016-11-24 08:14:55+00:00): Upendra, who are "We"? Did you discuss your revert with local community? Do you understand Ukrainian? Name "Продукти" is very popular for convenience shops in Ukraine. If you didn't check any of those points on the ground you are not allowed to remove them.
andygol (2016-11-25 09:56:28+00:00): dimitrius00
Можливо кращім рішенням було б все ж таки використовувати власні назви для всіх цих магазинів, замість загальної "Продукти" (як наприклад "Оксана" або "Затишок"), якщо вони звісно є.
Upendrakarukonda (2016-11-25 10:55:52+00:00): Hello,

I really apologise for my rush with reverting the changeset. Thank you for restoring the data back. Прошу вибачення за помилкове рішення про скасування цього набору змін з мого боку.

Regards,
Upendra.
mavl (2019-01-31 17:01:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:53:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
maraf24 (2016-10-26 20:46:53+00:00): Proszę wiecej tego nie robić.
Minh Nguyen (2016-11-19 00:39:13+00:00): I reverted this change in changeset 43785169 because Q10824750 is for a Thanh Hà in a different province. Thanh Hóa province does have two Thanh Hà villages (thôn), but they aren’t in this part of the province. I’ve added a FIXME tag and will re-add wiki tags if I can find evidence that this is even the right name for the place.
Minh Nguyen (2016-11-19 00:51:13+00:00): For what it’s worth, this POI was originally part of an import that tagged all places as place=town. Clearly there’s a place here, but the author of the import has said that POIs that don’t make sense should be deleted.
unsungNovelty (2016-11-21 07:29:26+00:00): Thanks for the correction Minh. Lemme know if you need any help with the clean up if you are encountering more of this.
literan (2016-10-26 15:36:40+00:00): поставил правильный тег: amenity=brothel
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:51:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did youe see the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72596045 ? Can I merge the both objects?
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:49:19+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-16 19:33:16+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
mapper999 (2016-10-31 13:15:44+00:00): Hallo Joachim,
damit die Daten auch sinnvoll ausgewertet können, sollten die Sorten nach diesem Schema (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel) eingetragen werden.
Viele Grüße
Steffen
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:48:23+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Kengaru (2017-02-24 12:48:55+00:00): такого адрес не бывает ангар 4
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:46:33+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:42:40+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:41:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
GerdP (2018-10-16 15:02:25+00:00): Hi! You changed / added some ways to highway=demolished here. It is a good idea to keep those ways because Mapbox still shows them, but I think this tag is a bit unclear, it might be missunderstood as "bad surface". I've changed them to razed:highway=* here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63579566
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:34:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:47:25+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
highflyer74 (2016-10-27 06:45:10+00:00): Moin Xamo!

Kannst Du hier bitte einmal nachsehen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449529995? landuse=* wird nur für Landnutzung genommen, nicht aber für Gebäude oder Gebäudeteile...

Es gibt da auch noch andere Gebäude, die mit landuse=* bezeichnet wurden.

Wenn Du Hilfe brauchst, kann ich gern helfen.

Oliver
maraf24 (2016-10-26 20:45:06+00:00): amenity=cafe bez podanego cuisine nie ma praktycznie sensu. Teraz Spichlerz to może być: kawiarnia, bistro, lodziarnia, restauracja.
Ich strona wskazuje, że to jest bar lub restauracja.
one_half_3544 (2016-10-27 08:53:05+00:00): ok, retagged.
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:23:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have correct your website (double http://) and add some description of your business.
Alecs01 (2016-10-29 14:12:56+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto, ho cancellato questo nodo perchè era già mappata a pochi metri da lì: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1724555846
pavani_03 (2019-06-14 06:31:47+00:00): Hi whalerich,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 449532215, here intersection configuration is incorrect, as per the ground reality it should be simple # configuration as shown in this Screenshot (https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-evVM27fjAug/XQM8DhB7I3I/AAAAAAAAAvo/Ocdx0GeoNOMdXkufL3TCRZPzlpmF3pVFgCK8BGAs/s0/2019-06-13.png)

Please suggest what needs to be done in such cases.

and same for the way 449532209

Thanks in advance.
whalerich (2019-06-14 06:47:22+00:00): Hello!
If you think that the configuration of this intersection in the OSM is wrong, you can always correct it. Please do as you see fit.
Best wishes!
Bence Mélykúti (2018-11-04 14:49:01+00:00): Az ezt a szerkesztést megelőző, feltehetően öntől származó jegyzetet megoldottnak jelöltem, de kérem, ellenőrizze, és ami még nincs bent a térképen, arra hozzon létre ezen a környéken egy új jegyzetet (note). Köszönöm!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/736168
Alecs01 (2016-10-26 18:22:15+00:00): Hi Reuben and welcome to OpenStreetMap! is this really an hotel or a private house? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4464789993 I also doubt this could be an artwork https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4464789992
hsc666 (2016-10-26 18:55:33+00:00): Was soll das sein - ein Autobahnrastplatz im Hinterhof? Bitte sieh Dir <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite> an, wenn Du bei OSM mithelfen möchtest!
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:17:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2016-10-26 17:36:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных.  
  
В OpenStreetMap не используются сокращения. Вместо "ул. Ленина» нужно писать "улица Ленина".  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия]  
  
Для наименования улиц в Росси используется специальное соглашение.  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог]  
  
Тег addr:city=Октябрьский не нужен на границе населённого пункта. Его название уже указано в теге name.
lexaikon (2016-10-26 19:08:09+00:00): Hallo,

wieso wurde das umgetagged? Der vorherige Name "Ringbebauung" und die Kennzeichnung als "attraction" waren doch OK.

Die neue Bezeichnung und der Commit-Kommentar sehen eher nach Werbung aus?

Spam? Reverten?
Pilatisten (2016-10-27 08:22:54+00:00): Hallo lexaikon, es war keinesfalls Absicht, den Gebäudenamen selbst umzutaggen. Ich bitte um Entschuldigung, wenn dies aus Versehen geschah, ursprünglich wollte ich der Hausnr. 12 nur das Pilatesstudio hinzufügen, wie z.B. auch das Ring-Cafe oder der Karaokeclub dort stehen. Könnten Sie u.U. helfen dabei? Bitte um Entschuldigung, denn die Ringbebauung selbst sollte selbstverständlich nicht entfernt werden.
lexaikon (2016-10-27 20:31:31+00:00): kein Problem. Ich zieh das gerade. Weißt Du, wo für das Studio der Eingang ist? Die 12 ist ja so "mittendrin". Gehts da "von hinten" rein?
Pilatisten (2016-11-01 07:23:48+00:00): Ach super, besten Dank! Der Studioeingang liegt genau zwischen Hausnummer 11 und 12.  Man kommt über den Roßplatz, also "von worn" hinein. Viele Grüße!
user_5359 (2016-10-26 17:47:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your fast food has the name walmart and the website from McDonalds? Really?
BCNorwich (2016-10-26 17:30:46+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I think if you visit this footpath you will find it is a public right of way. Therefore tagging should reflect this, foot=designated, designation=public_footpath also access=permissive is incorrect and should be removed.
Tomas Straupis (2016-10-26 18:21:48+00:00): craps.me rubbish change reverted
BAN CRAPS.ME
user_5359 (2016-10-26 18:17:51+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
trigpoint (2016-10-26 17:50:55+00:00): Please remember that OSM is a public database, it is considered vandalism to rename existing objects to personal markers. I am reverting this change
user_5359 (2016-10-26 17:45:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the english name of node 4464814990!
highflyer74 (2016-10-27 07:14:06+00:00): Moin Fuchs!

Nicht böse sein, aber der Bouleplatz war schon vorhanden. Ich habe den von Dir eingetragenen wieder entfernt. Generell kann ich Dir empfehlen, zum Editieren einen richtigen Editor zu nutzen. OsmAnd ist eine tolle Kartenapp, die ich auch regelmässig nutze, aber zum Mappen eignen sich richtige Editoren wie JOSM (oder mobil auf Android: Vespucci) sehr viel besser, da sie mit Livedaten arbeiten.

Wenn Du noch Fragen hast: immer her damit!

Gruss aus HB!
Pannenfuchs (2016-11-03 12:35:44+00:00): Moin Flyer,
alles gut, hast ja Recht. Danke für die Tipps, werde Vespucci mal testen.
LG Volker
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:01:16+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:01:49+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Rom1 (2016-10-26 21:22:12+00:00): Bonjour, d'accord pour retirer le tag "name" comme vu là https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Meurthe-et-Moselle/R%C3%A9union_des_contributeurs_Nancy_12-10-2016 ? Merci
Axelos (2016-11-02 23:13:13+00:00): D’après ce qui avait été dit lors de la réunion, les stations n'ont pas de nom n'y adresse. Donc oui pour le retrait :)
Alexander-II (2017-12-14 02:46:55+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок вы повесили на тротуар bicycle=yes https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125295570/history Если там не стоит знака, что по этому тротуару разрешено передвижение на велосипеде, то и тег этот не нужен. По ПДД такое передвежение разрешено по всем тротуарам при определенных условиях.
muralito (2016-10-26 19:38:25+00:00): Los "primary_link" son para rampas. ¿Donde ves una rampa aca?
TheNodeWarrior (2016-10-26 23:09:35+00:00): Mi entendimiento y según el wiki, highway_links pueden ser utilizados para los giros exclusivos que están separados y en rotondas, no sólo rampas.  Aqui, el highway_link conecta los dos segmentos principales del carretera internacional.  ¿Por qué no una rotonda?
muralito (2016-10-27 01:12:44+00:00): Para mi el wiki es claro que no es este el caso.

Dice "Links are also used in roundabout designs that physically separate a specific turn from the main roundabout." y en esta rotonda nada separa una salida especifica de la rotonda.
TheNodeWarrior (2016-10-27 21:55:14+00:00): Ah, gracias. Es confuso para mi. ¿Cuáles son sus criterios para las rotondas, y por qué es esto no una rotonda?
pkoby (2016-10-27 18:29:47+00:00): You really shouldn't delete ways with lots of history. Any reason you can't realign the existing ways to a GPS trace? I think this changeset (and 43195172) should be reverted.
mbeyerle (2016-10-28 19:17:53+00:00): Seeing as laurel run road was deleted with these edits, I would agree
pkoby (2016-10-28 19:24:50+00:00): Reverted both changesets.
maraf24 (2016-11-04 19:04:45+00:00): https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Szadkowice-Ogrodzim
hammerheart (2016-11-04 19:17:11+00:00): Prawidłowa nazwa miejscowości to Szadkowice-Ogrodzim Osiedle. Proszę nie zmieniać. Szadkowice-Ogrodzim leży gdzie indziej.
hammerheart (2016-11-04 19:19:30+00:00): Szadkowice-Ogrodzim to sołectwo. Obejmuje ono Ogrodzim, Szadkowice- Ogrodzim Osiedle, Szadkowice i Szadkowice- Kolonię.
maraf24 (2016-11-04 19:25:01+00:00): Nieprawda. Szadkowice-Ogrodzim to wieś w gminie Szadek i tej wsi dotyczy ten węzeł oraz wszystkie dane w nim zawarte. Proszę tego go nie ruszać.
Jeśli miejsce jest nieprawidłowe to należy to zgłosić i wskazać właściwe.
trigpoint (2016-10-26 18:06:47+00:00): This is a very odd set of tags, please can you explain?
trigpoint (2016-10-26 18:07:02+00:00): This is a very odd set of tags, please can you explain?
user_5359 (2016-10-26 17:44:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
mueschel (2016-10-29 16:42:02+00:00): Hi outing,
please check the tagging of your edits - some errors I already corrected but I guess there are more, e.g. on this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449554380
I found the tags 
contact_we
contact_ph
addr_place
addr_postc
The values might be accurate but are not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look to the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let us know in case you need help!
trigpoint (2016-10-26 17:53:25+00:00): Does the Vet have an actual name, is B&M a Homestore or Bargains?
Please capitaise name correctly
rza31 (2016-10-28 14:54:40+00:00): Hallo davidkoenig09,
willkommen bei OSM. 
Gebäude werden mit building=yes, bzw. building=garage eingetragen. landuse=residential ist nicht für Gebäude vorgesehen.

rza31
RicoElectrico (2016-10-26 17:22:20+00:00): Hej, zapomniałem powiedzieć Ci że oprócz niestyków na skrzyżowaniach dróg też powinny być węzły. Tutaj na skrzyżowaniu z Głowackiego.
RicoElectrico (2016-10-26 17:22:47+00:00): oprocz niestyków = oprócz poprawienia niestyków ;)
jaap de vries (2017-01-09 15:29:10+00:00): Dag Chris,
Ik zie dat hier ook fouten zijn die je hebt gemaakt. Je hebt bij name:en, hier wordt bedoeld een Engelse naam als het bedrijf dat heeft , bv Burger King. Nu heb je hier Nederland neergezet. Verander je dit even?
Chris Huizing (2017-01-09 15:36:53+00:00): Ok komt goed doe ik nu ff. Dank je
muralito (2016-10-26 19:17:04+00:00): Con que criterio revisaste?
TheNodeWarrior (2016-10-26 23:11:47+00:00): Si, los Ministerio de Transporte y Obras Publicas sitio tiene geoservicios de WFS de rutas nacionales.  El geoservicios muestra la ruta 1 termina en la terminal del ferry, mientras que la ruta 21 sigue Avenida Jose Batlle y Ordonez.  Sitio web: http://geoportal.mtop.gub.uy/geoserv.html
Alan Trick (2016-10-30 07:23:37+00:00): Can you double check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/445849285 ? It's doesn't make sense, what does "oneway=-1" mean?
gausserrorfunction (2016-10-27 06:56:36+00:00): Moin, 
wäre cool gewesen, wenn Du vor dem Revert mal nachgefragt hättest.

Unter der Hochspannungsleitung sind bis zum Feldrand die Bäume auf Busch-Niveau gehalten -- das muss auch so sein. Was spricht dagegen, das entsprechend zu mappen?
Was genau meinst Du mit "Baumschulen gehören dann wohl auch zum Forst"? Die Weihnachtsbäume sind ja auch nach Deinem Edit nicht im Plessforst/Stadtwald-Multipolygon drin...?! Ich weiß nicht, ob das sinnvoll ist, aber darüber könnte man diskutieren.
gausserrorfunction