piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-03-08 02:00:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
luschi (2018-03-19 18:30:18+00:00): Hello 8dirfriend, 
I changed 2016 all `bridge_name`/`tunnel_name` to `bridge:name`/`tunnel:name` after contacting talk-ja. 
Please no longer use `bridge_name`/`tunnel_name` with underscore( _ ) in Japan. 
here the link to talk-ja: 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2016-August/009485.html

regards
luschi
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:40:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
viloan (2018-03-08 02:56:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
RussNelson (2020-11-05 21:06:11+00:00): Hi. You say that the rails are dismantled, but I can see rails in various stretches in the Google Streetview photos. E.g. https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7427387,-73.424831,3a,60y,12.24h,88t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sSxwoOSPafGLze8jBzI9fjw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
user_5359 (2018-03-08 04:57:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add a tag building=construction to the highway="W Stadium Ave". Is it that what you intended (there is also a highway=construction)?
Maxattax (2018-03-08 05:54:45+00:00): highway=construction sounds correct. I don't know if this is what I am supposed to put, the road has been functional for a long time, but they recently decided to do some very heavy work on it. It's totally blocked off.

Thanks for checking this!
user_5359 (2018-03-08 05:58:12+00:00): Please do not forget to restore the original value after completion of the construction work!
Kenny Hung (2018-03-08 03:48:15+00:00): #amm
freebeer (2018-03-08 11:13:31+00:00): Hallo,
the road segment you deleted can be seen too have existed as a private access road into a field.
However this area can be seen to be very hilly with erosion that has taken out most of the east part imported from TIGER, and instead it takes a switchbacked path to the north now., before emerging onto the driveway mapped to the northeast.
This, if left in, should have been downgraded to a poor track.
Other tracks can be seen criss-crossing the area, and this one does pass an electrical pole without a clear destination, though.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:26:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
user_5359 (2018-03-08 06:30:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area.
chachafish (2018-03-13 02:33:36+00:00): Greetings. I see you created some lines, or ways, northeast of East 110th Avenue and Landmark Drive in Commerce City. Did you mean to create residential roads here? Can you please add the correct tags? If you need any assistance, please feel free to ask :)
mbethke (2018-03-14 05:16:19+00:00): Hi,
"Mabgkokham" looks like a strange spelling for Lao. Are you sure about that?
maraf24 (2018-03-09 14:43:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163901351 - this is not a track.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:39:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
freebeer (2018-03-08 10:57:00+00:00): Hallo,
this road segment can be seen as the turning end of a driveway whose path is easy to follow in the archival imagery layer that corresponds fairly well to the ten year age.
Now no other driveways are mapped here yet, such as the one parallel to it and repaved more recently for the house north of here, but they can be seen easily enough, so there is not too much lost here, except the hint that the driveway ends near this point, to make adding it in full easier.
Glassman (2018-03-08 06:40:24+00:00): I don't understand what feature you added? Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=information for help adding tourism information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56988537
Elmore91 (2018-03-08 06:48:47+00:00): I guess the picture of the map isn't up to date, in reality there is a information stand out there explaining about the Ridgefield National Wildlife Refuge, the closest option I could find to label it was "Information" and I wasn't sure whether to wait until the map is updated or if it would automatically just roll over when the map is updated, heres a pic :3 https://i.imgur.com/Hf4XHTt.jpg
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56988537
freebeer (2018-03-08 11:40:26+00:00): Hallo,
Going by DigitalGlobe Standard imagery, I would say:
building=no makes no sense for your area here. I think I see a rectangular structure maybe 5m long.  Just a roof?  Or an actual enclosed stand?  (Or a vehicle at time of the photo?)
Your info-`i' does appear, but nothing to suggest an area, rectangular or random.
Note that the only non-satellite imagery with any detail is also the oldest and pretty useless for mapping any paths seen today or even aligning.
Glassman (2018-03-08 20:06:13+00:00): Using your image I changed the building=no area to highway=pedestrian since that's what it looks like. and added an info board in the center. Feel free to revert if it's not what you think it should be. Also added a fixme to align when new imagery is available.
user_5359 (2018-03-08 06:31:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

Please have also a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
viloan (2018-03-08 06:15:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:39:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Cascafico (2018-03-08 09:45:09+00:00): Ciao (e benvenuto ij OSM :-)

per cortesia: i numeri di telefono nel formato internazionele...
per esempio:
+39 040 313131
user_5359 (2018-03-08 08:39:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please see the tag name and name:en for the pharmacy. The booth keys should have the same value.
Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:40:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:03:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:04:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
user_5359 (2018-03-08 15:48:39+00:00): It would be very helpful if you read and accept the change comments. Similarly, the incorrect keys should not be used again for corrections, but rather the corrections. The value of key description has been identified as advertising and deleted as unwanted.
freebeer (2018-03-11 23:21:47+00:00): If they're going to delete the opening_hours you fixed for them, perhaps they are trying to tell you it's now closed, and should be deleted from the map.
(As a non-speaker, I can only parse OSM keys in their defined format, and can't figure out half the rubbish there is here.  Like `Hours'?  Must be a typo for the OSM key whores=value )
Baloo Uriza (2018-03-09 03:53:47+00:00): These could have been converted to highway=service more accurately.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56989838
gabro00 (2018-09-13 19:12:47+00:00): Itt mire gondoltál a cycleway:both=no taggel? Csak annyi, hogy határozottan nincs bringaút?  
Ma láttam a behajtani tilos tábla alatt a kivéve kerékpár felmentést, ezt felraktam a térképre.
GBAB (2018-09-17 07:16:24+00:00): Szevasz Gabro00!
Bevallom, fogalmam sincs, mire gondoltam egy fél éve… Szerintem nyugodtan törölheted.
Kösz az észrevételt!
Gábor
gabro00 (2018-09-17 07:20:27+00:00): Rendben, azért ma ha lesz időm megnézem alaposabban a helyszínen.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:39:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
freebeer (2018-03-08 10:27:36+00:00): Hallo,
It looks like here you have deleted one outer way, leaving behind several inner ways detailed for one of the two relations listed below.
You might want to add them as inners to the remaining relation, assuming they match the imagery.  I've not looked at this as the outlines look too coarse and mechanical for me to guess what is being done or intended with the slightly-different-but-overlapping polygons.
freebeer (2018-03-08 10:39:35+00:00): Hallo,
This road you deleted and the house it serves, as well as the others branching off it, are quite easy to see in the imagery I looked at, even USGS (probably the oldest) as your source.
Things do not change much in this part of the world even after well over ten years.
I am not sure why your deletion only affected from the county line to the northwest, and not down to the nearby NC 73 to which it can be seen connecting, along the way passing another house served by this road, and if the TIGER import missed that much..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:04:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-07-25 19:03:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61065639 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles by icuit reported to the Data Working Group (those that have not already been reverted).
Baloo Uriza (2018-03-09 03:57:39+00:00): Please be careful about copying tags to new ways in the same street.  Granted, this may be easier in JOSM than in ID.  Otherwise, nice catch.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/56990601
4004 (2018-03-12 19:30:58+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты.
если вы хотели отметить радары, то они уже там есть. ваши отметки - для камер наблюдения.
удаляю
opendcc (2018-03-08 14:57:44+00:00): This changeset contains obviously mostly pokemon mapping and was reverted. 

Tim, Du bist herzlich eingeladen, SINNVOLL bei openstreetmap mitzumachen. OpenStreetMap ist Datenbank für alle möglichen Dienste - auch der Pokemonhersteller darf das nutzen. Aber es ist nicht erlaubt, wegen der virtuellen Jagd nicht existierende Dinge zu taggen oder existierende Dinge falsch zu taggen! Damit risksierst Du ernsthafte Schwierigkeit. Zusammen mit dem Edit wird auch Deine Rechneradresse in unserer Datenbank hinterlegt.
RicoElectrico (2018-03-08 11:40:44+00:00): Cześć. Dodałeś przedszkole jako atrakcję turystyczną, co jest błędem. Poprawiam to.

Bardzo polecam edytować mapę przez edytor na stronie osm.org, bo ten w maps.me jest bardzo wybrakowany. Nie ma wielu typów obiektów, a dodawanie rzeczy z błędnym typem jest niepożądane.
RicoElectrico (2018-03-08 11:42:58+00:00): Poprawione. Dzięki za zainteresowanie się edytowaniem OSM. Jeśli masz jakieś pytania, śmiało pisz do mnie :)
rskedgell (2020-02-03 11:34:48+00:00): Some of the infrastructure may now be complete around the junction of Sumner Road with Commercial Way, as LB Southwark have introduced traffic orders effective from 2020-02-03.

See note #2077953 and
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3482025 

I will try to get there some time this week and take some Mapillary imagery along C35.
MacLondon (2020-02-03 20:42:46+00:00): I'd be a little surprised if work on the proposed cycle tracks has already been done, but I agree the Commercial Way junction might well be worth the survey.

If you get the chance, there is a planned pathway realignment/straightening (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/567718774) that could be worth keeping an eye for, although I don't expect this has been worked on yet.
rskedgell (2020-02-08 15:39:12+00:00): You're quite right about the work not having started yet, seeing the traffic order made me a little overoptimistic.

There were land surveyors working on the section of Surrey Canal Walk east of Summer Road, so work may be due to start soon. I'll try check on progress whenever I cycle down to Beckenham Place Park lake.

Mapillary images for C35 from south to north are in the process of being uploaded and should be available soon.
MacLondon (2020-02-08 20:40:45+00:00): Thanks for the update.

Southwark also had a tmo for contraflow cycling on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506015142 ~5 months ago... that hasn't yet been enacted. So this C35 work might not be done for a while yet.

http://public.londonworks.gov.uk/roadworks shows that there is 'Q9' work planned in April around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7998498, which might well be the start of the planned work here for the C35 route.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:39:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
user_5359 (2018-03-12 15:14:12+00:00): Hallo, mal davon abgesehen, dass der Schlüssel note nicht für private Diskussionen gedacht ist, wäre doch der Changeset Kommentar bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56285060 besser geeignet, dass die Information auch ankommt.
Wo wir gerade bei Fehlern sind: eine Anbetungsstätte wird mit "amenity"="place_of_worship" notiert und nicht mit "amenity"="place of_worship". Und tatsächlich ist die Verwendung vom diesem Tag bei einem Wegkreuz eher unüblich, siehe auch Beschreibung https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic%3Dwayside_cross oder auch Taginfo https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/historic=wayside_cross#combinations. Allein das löschen von religion=christian ist diskussionswürdig, aber dazu müsste man auch das Entstehungsjahr wissen. Am Wegkreuz selber ist der Wert für denomination in den wenigsten Fällen erkennbar.
Cassini97 (2018-03-15 20:56:15+00:00): Servus!
Wenn Du einen Tipp- oder Autovervollständigungsfehler findest darfst Du den gerne selbstständig verbessern.

-Das löschen der Religion ist tatsächlich nicht diskussionswürdig, weil fehlerhaft.
Was das Entstehungsjahr damit zu tun hat weiß ich nicht.

-denomination muß man allerdings wissen, aber im erzkatholischen Würzburg, Gegenreformator/Fürstbischof Julius Echter sei 'Dank', kannste davon ausgehen das katholisch zutrifft.
Die vielen Bildstöcke/Kreuze stehen auch deswegen bei uns rum, weil die katholischen Fürstbischöfe so ihr Gebiet auch gegen die restlichen, mehrheitlich evangelischen Franken kenntlich machten. Religion hat bekanntlich auch immer mit Macht zu tun.

- Andachtsstätte... egal ob Bildstock/Kreuzschlepper oder Wegkreuz sind tatsächlich solche. Kann plastisch z.B. zu Fronleichnamsumzügen, Patronats- oder Kirchweihfesten beobachtet werden. Auf dem Land sieht man auch immer wieder Gläubige beim Gebet (vorallem auf den gefährlichen Reisen in alter Zeit). Das beschränkt sich nicht nur auf Kirchen. Wobei z.B. auch diverse Aussegnungshallen/Kapellen auf Friedhöfen dazuzählen. Im Christentum ist der Begriff ziemlich vielfältig. Der tag macht auch bei anderen Religionen Sinn, wo ein Andersgläubiger nicht gleich erkennt, daß das Objekt einen religiösen Hintergrund hat. Ob ich beim ersten Anschein gleich auf z.B. Buddhisdisch käme?
-Bildstöcke/Wegkreuze: Was mir bei dem Thema sowieso fehlt ist etwas in der Art type=xyz. Gerade bei Bildstöcken gibt es verschiedenste Arten. Gerade bei den bei uns beliebten Kreuzschleppern wanke ich gerne zwischen den zwei Optionen.
Gruß
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-11 19:39:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58015667 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by sri_harsha because of participation in an undiscussed organised edit with lots of errors. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
SomeoneElse (2018-03-09 12:30:43+00:00): "Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy
Nakaner-repair (2018-07-12 18:27:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60661711 where the changeset comment is: Reverting potential copyright violations by mentioning Bayernatlas as source
tonyf1 (2018-03-09 04:30:28+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your map contributions. You have marked three hotels. Hazel looks like a private house in the satellite photos. Is it? The other two are very close to existing hotels. Are they duplicates?
tonyf1 (2018-03-10 23:37:04+00:00): No reply to changeset comment, deleted 3 hotels
user_5359 (2018-03-08 15:31:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
mueschel (2018-03-11 11:57:24+00:00): Hi,
the dog tags on this restaurant are new, and not used before. What do you think about the following tagging, which follows the established 'access' and 'conditional access' keys:

dog = yes
dog:conditional = no @ (12:00-15:00);no @ (weight > 10)

Cheers, Jan
kempelen (2018-03-12 12:07:45+00:00): Szia! Köszi a javításokat. Ellenőrzést kértél, azért nézem meg.
A Google Maps-ról nem szabad átvenni dolgokat, mert az egy jogvédett anyag, és az OpenStreetMap csak úgy biztosíthatja a szabad licencét, ha a rajzolók a regisztrációnál elfogadott elvek szerint saját hozzájárulásokból vagy erre a célra megkapott adatokból rajzolnak. Ez az apróság persze nem a világ vége, de később inkább saját magad által is látott, vagy forrásként felhasználhatónak megjelölt anyagokból dolgozz. Köszi! :-)
A jelölésed egyébként jó!
covek (2018-03-12 12:44:45+00:00): Ok, A google nekem csak referencia volt. Ott voltam a helyszínen és láttam hogy néz ki a parkoló. Ezért volt a módosítási javaslat! Örülök, hoghy jól csináltam amit kellett! :)
kempelen (2018-03-12 12:53:48+00:00): OK, köszi! :)
user_6328178 (2018-03-08 15:15:01+00:00): Please consider revert the change of Lung Wo Road based on local knowledge

The satellite image is outdated
Nakaner-repair (2018-07-12 18:27:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60661711 where the changeset comment is: Reverting potential copyright violations by mentioning Bayernatlas as source
BCNorwich (2018-03-08 15:57:50+00:00): Hi, that pub was already mapped with a POI.
I've drawn in the building and put both POI info there. Regards
sommerluk (2018-03-08 14:07:19+00:00): Merci !
Nakaner-repair (2018-07-12 18:27:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60661711 where the changeset comment is: Reverting potential copyright violations by mentioning Bayernatlas as source
Athoss16 (2018-03-10 20:08:26+00:00): Szia!
Kértél ellenőrzést a szerkesztéshez. Szerkesztő nézetben ha kijelölöd az épületet, majd jobb klick és kiválasztod a "Derékszögesítés"-t, akkor sokkal pontosabb lesz.
Wulfmorn (2018-03-08 11:43:26+00:00): Skulle varit en outer ring för farmland.
archie (2018-03-08 15:00:32+00:00): ok. Sorry
bkil (2022-09-11 11:03:29+00:00): Szeretnék érdeklődni, hogy honnan vannak a házszámok? Az óvoda honlapján Tompa utca 8 szerepel, viszont fizikailag az óvoda nem ott található.
sputnik8300 (2018-07-09 06:01:40+00:00): Hallo BacanDeLaives,
pass in Zukunft bitte besser auf was du änderst. Mit dieser Änderung hast du einen Wald im Teich gepflanzt.
lg