piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gsimon (2018-07-08 20:53:42+00:00): Bonjoue Eddie, drôle d'idée de tagguer la place Jean Plotton en neighbourhood (quartier), non ?
gsimon (2018-07-08 20:55:36+00:00): Idem pour la place Boivin
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-16 18:02:55+00:00): Kolego, masz jakiś dowód na to, że ta miejscowość nazywa się Podlaski?
Ja nie znalazłem.
spartak777 (2015-04-18 07:43:02+00:00): Kolego po pierwsze na geoportalu na skanach mapy topograficznej.
Po drugie drogowskaz na 19 wskazuję drogę na Podlaski a nie laski. 
Po 3 żaden mieszkaniec Janowa nie słyszał nigdy o laskach tylko o podpaskach. 
A terytu tej miejscowości nie mogę znaleźć. Polecam zobaczyć co pisze na drogowskazie używając Street View
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-18 09:52:08+00:00): O podpaskach, powiadasz? ;-)
Wg EMUiA i PRNG tam są Laski jako część miejscowości Borownica i tuż obok Laski jako część miejscowości Biała Pierwsza. Nie neguję istnienia nazwy Podlaski, jednak trzeba to rozwiązać w inny sposób, tzn. przez dodanie drugiego (trzeciego) punktu miejscowości.
ViriatoLusitano (2015-04-16 07:35:25+00:00): Bom trabalho! Provavelmente já existiu um café aqui mas que com o tempo deixou de existir.
will_p (2015-04-15 14:47:59+00:00): Have reverted. See changeset comment.
fra76mm (2015-04-16 11:51:00+00:00): Ciao, ti suggerisco di inserire anche le stelle "stars=..." ,l'indirizzo "addr:street=...." e "addr:housenumber=....", e i contatti "phone=..." "email=..." "website=...."
ampcosta22 (2015-04-15 14:38:41+00:00): Não se pode classificá-lo simplesmente como represa não?
Skippern (2015-04-15 14:44:25+00:00): Nao sei com os traducoes, o waterway=dam e para a barreira da represa, en quanto waterway=basin ou landuse=reservoir e para o corpo da agua na represa. Eu acho landuse=reservoir mais certo porque a palavre basin tem mais que uma traducao e fico um pouco ambiguous.
naoliv (2015-04-15 14:51:53+00:00): ampcosta22, tanto landuse=reservoir quanto natural=water + water=reservoir indicam exatamente a mesma coisa (uma represa ou área utilizada para represar água).
O segundo formato é mais recente.
ampcosta22 (2015-04-15 14:53:20+00:00): Utilizando a classificação REPRESA no Editor ID, aparecem 02 tags:
natural = water
water = reservoir
naoliv (2015-04-15 14:54:39+00:00): Isso. Mas se tiver "Uso da Terra" com tipo reservoir, é exatamente a mesma coisa, não precisando substituir.
ampcosta22 (2015-04-15 14:58:39+00:00): Legal
Skippern (2015-04-15 15:05:50+00:00): No meu opiniao o tag waterway=dam deve ser mudaso pra man_made=dam pra evitar justamente este tipo confusao
andygol (2015-04-16 11:04:14+00:00): @Mariagreen24
Я (как один из сотрудников Mapbox) получил через сервис обратной связи https://www.mapbox.com/map-feedback/ уведомление о „неправильном названии СНТ "Восход"“.  Хочу отметить, что вы добавили дубликат, ранее существующего полигона (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68301839) для обозначения СНТ "Восход". 
Так как это ваша первая правка, и вы еще не в полной мере ознакомились с основами создания карт в ОСМ, прошу вас отменить, сделанные вами изменения. Если у вас возникнут вопросы, вы всегда можете задать их мне - https://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/andygol, или обсудить их с другими участниками (например на http://forum.osm.org/) См http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Contact
ToeBee (2015-04-15 14:58:13+00:00): There is registration for a camp set up in the middle of a road intersection? What are you trying to add to the map?
m20c1963 (2015-04-15 15:47:20+00:00): I should have placed the point on the registration building.  When I learn how to make the change I will move it.
ToeBee (2015-04-16 18:29:53+00:00): To add a building, use the "Area" tool at the top of the editor window to trace the outline of the building. Then you can add a name or whatever else to that area. If you want some real-time help, feel free to hop on the OSM IRC channel at http://irc.openstreetmap.org
waldhans (2015-04-16 15:21:46+00:00): cycleway=opposite ist falsch! Habe das gerade abgefahren, die Einbahn ist NICHT für Radfahrer aufgehoben, werde das sofort korrigieren.
Hast du irgendwelche geheimen Informationen oder war das nur ein Wunschtraum?
Constable (2018-03-23 16:21:05+00:00): ciao Simone, vedo che questa modifica è vecchia, però magari al contrario di me tu conosci la zona. Daresti un'occhiata a questa nota per favore https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1336204 ?
grazie
Simone Saviolo (2018-03-23 16:30:23+00:00): Rispondo alla nota, ma non lo so. Non ci sono mai più stato...
Constable (2018-03-23 16:42:10+00:00): ciao, peccato, grazie per la risposta immediata però!
GerdP (2015-10-19 06:20:56+00:00): please review:
I've changed 
www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/338651621
from highway=undefined to highway=service 
Maybe it is also a living_street?
Besides that the current satellite pictures show a rather big offset, Mapbox smaller than Bing, but maybe the roads should be moved a bit to the east?
zipp1001 (2015-04-15 16:14:32+00:00): Leśniczówka Łącza
luiswoo (2015-04-15 20:31:04+00:00): Зачем нужны дачные туалеты? Это обозначение для общественных.
-off- (2015-04-16 04:23:28+00:00): Это я по пути домой с помощью pushpin ставил номера домов. Чтобы дома их перенести на карту, но это как-то мало помогает - на спутнике там ничего не разобрать. Потом уберу их.
flohoff (2015-04-16 06:07:33+00:00): Hi,
leider hast du keinen Changeset kommentar hinterlassen was du hier gemacht hast und warum.

Ich gehe davon aus das es drum ging das ein natural=peak reicht und kein zusätzliches place=locality notwendig ist?

Das ist nur geraten von den changes die ich entdeckt habe.

flo
flohoff (2015-04-16 06:08:34+00:00): Ich nehme an hier hast du nur eine Hügelspitze eingetragen aus "local knowledge" ?
zimba (2015-04-16 09:13:41+00:00): Hallo,

Abkuerzungen wie 'FEG' bitte ausschreiben (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#Abk.C3.BCrzungen_.28nicht_verwenden.21.29), und das 'Evangelical' vom 'denomination' sollte klein sein.


lg
Maronib (2015-04-16 09:45:34+00:00): Hallo,
Danke für den Hinweis. Korrigiere ich doch gleich. 😊
lg
Hjart (2015-04-16 06:29:45+00:00): Jeg har tagget dit hus korrekt således at det nu fremtræder på kortet
maraf24 (2015-04-17 18:22:54+00:00): Już nie przesadzajmy z tymi nazwami rodzajowymi. Że to jest śmietnik wynika z samego tagu, nazwa "śmietnik" jest niepotrzebna, a nawet niepożądana.
flohoff (2015-04-16 06:11:36+00:00): Den hier finde nen bischen obskur - bei Wind gibts jetzt wenig möglichkeiten da anders Strom draus zu gewinnen als durch eine wind_turbine

Redundanz schafft sicherheit - schön wäre ein Kommentar gewesen weshalb du meinst das das doppelt drauf muss.

flo
mweper (2015-04-15 22:06:35+00:00): Hola Aurora.
Veo que quisiste agregar un área de una escuela pero no etiquetaste nada. Por favor, corrige eso, dime que es o deja una nota y yo lo haré.
Saludos.
AURORA CECILIA (2015-04-15 22:50:57+00:00): TENGO QUE ETIQUETAR, LA ESCUELA PRIMARIA MANUEL BELGRANO N 234, EN LA CIUDAD DE CARCARAÑA, PROVINCIA DE SANTA FE.
Sandal man (2021-08-21 18:50:11+00:00): Hallo, du bist enige wegen (3) vergessen zu taggen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338670804#map=17/37.63644/-6.09689
Grusse Jan
Larry0ua (2015-04-15 18:33:32+00:00): еще багрепорт :) тут track-и разъединились http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136412369
uname (2015-04-15 18:41:56+00:00): на том участке треки - границы мультиполигонов - я какраз в той степи наводу порядок
Larry0ua (2015-04-15 18:43:24+00:00): имею ввиду, что у тех треков нет общих точек, хотя они очень близки.
uname (2015-04-15 18:46:35+00:00): да я обычно прохожусь потом по валидатору http://pavlo-dudka.github.io/osm-pg-tests/ - он просто неделю гдето эту зону вобще неотображал почемуто
aceman444 (2015-04-15 20:04:44+00:00): Dobry den, podla coho ste zadali na tych cestach na nabrezi Bratislavy foot=no? Kde je tam zakaz? Ci podla toho, ze je tam pozdlz chodnik?

A cesta 227103332 asi nebude cela footway=crossing. Mysleli ste footway=sidewalk?

A prosim piste pri odosielani komentar popisujuci vytvorenu sadu zmien, dufam, ze to editor iD umoznuje. Dakujem
aceman444 (2015-04-26 14:40:52+00:00): Ten "crossing" som opravil. Ostatne ste mi napisali spravou. Dakujem.
Eebie (2015-08-24 11:33:58+00:00): Hallo,
Ik ben bezig geweest met het toevoegen van gemarkeerde wandelroutes aan OSM in Belgisch Limburg. Ik zie dat PeerkePad is toegevoegd in de regio waar ik ook actief ben. Ik mis informatie over hoe dit pad gemarkeerd/bewegwijzerd is op het terrein.
Wat is de symbol en/of color? Het best is om dit toe te voegen als 'osmc:symbol' dan is het voor gebruikers van www.waymarkedtrails.org meteen duidelijk hoe zij dit pad op het terrein kunnen herkennen.

Groeten,

Erik (Eebie)
lupien (2015-08-24 12:25:29+00:00): Erik,

Het Peerkepad is een niet bewegwijzerde en niet gemarkeerde route. De route is beschreven in een boekje. Zie ook http://www.peerkepad.nl/index.php
Groeten Ad
Eebie (2015-08-24 12:37:47+00:00): Hallo,

Een route waarvan op het terrein niets terug te vinden horen niet op OSM en zou daar uit moeten verwijderd worden.
OSM is een kaart met gegevens op het terrein en eventueel veel extra informtie daar over.
PeerkePad is een route die te zien is op www.waymarkedtrail.org en dat klopt dus niet.

Er zijn alternatieven voor niet-gemarkeerde routes.:  de GPX files kan opgenomen worden op de website en op dit website kan een OSM kaart komen waar de route op te zien is (zo zijn er veel routes te zien op internet).

Groeten,

Erik
lupien (2015-08-25 07:42:50+00:00): Erik,

Kun je mij de site geven waar staat dat alleen gemarkeerde routes in OSM mogen.
Ad
Eebie (2015-09-03 21:10:31+00:00): Het was even zoeken. De argumenten zijn te vinden in de Wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice. Zie de richtlijnen 'Map what's on the ground' en 'Verifiability' (er is een Nederlandse versie/vertaling van die Wiki maar die is niet volledig).   De consequentie van 'Verifieerbaar' of 'Controleerbaar' ( in het Engels: Data should be verifiable) voor niet gemarkeerde routes, die enkel in een boek beschreven zijn, is dat een andere mapper die op de plaats van die route komt en geen markeringen of wegwijzers ziet, enkel kan besluiten dat die route er niet (meer) is en in OSM moet gewist worden. 
Ik heb zelf al oude, verdwenen routes gewist, die vervangen werden door nieuwere routes.  
Richtlijn 1 van Goods Practice is: 'Corrigeer fouten'. 
Waarschijnlijk zal de niet-gemarkeerde route PeerkePad op een gegeven moment uit OSM gewist worden. De paden en wegen waarover Peerkepad loopt kunnen uiteraard wel in OSM blijven omdat die er ook echt zijn. 
Een oplossing kan zijn om de GPX van Peerkepad op de website van Peerkepad te zetten op een achtergrond OSM zoals de GR op http://www.lumaj.be/index.php/nl/gr-paden/gr-561-nl/gr-561-topogids-kempenmaas-nl/722-lanklaar-lanaken-nl.html
maraf24 (2015-04-15 21:56:48+00:00): school a nie college
maraf24 (2015-04-15 21:50:03+00:00): NIeprawidłowy tag dla szkoły.
maraf24 (2015-04-15 21:48:47+00:00): Usuniecie tagu budynku, nieprawidłowy tag dla szkoły.
maraf24 (2015-04-15 21:44:36+00:00): Proszę przestać usuwać tagi budynków.
maraf24 (2015-04-15 21:35:04+00:00): Usuwanie informacji o budynkach to wandalizm.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-27 10:24:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236310963/history - czy to rzeczywiście jest nazwa całego budynku?

nie lepiej by railway=signal_box było z swoją nazwą jako osobny obiekt?
MikeN (2015-08-24 20:31:15+00:00): Hi, thank you for the edits.    I found some problems -

Frontage road was blocked years ago because it was a dangerous turn.  It looks strange for a named road to be connected only by a driveway, but that's the real way it ended up.  It would be dangerous for drivers to try to follow GPS for the current layout.  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/94285444 
Bing imagery even shows grass growing over the old Laurens Road entrance.

Brown Drive is no longer a named road, and I had deleted it months ago  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338689915  it is now back to a driveway
MikeN (2015-08-24 22:24:31+00:00): One thing that will help - if the TIGER:reviewed flag has been removed, do not modify that road back to old TIGER because someone local has already worked with it.
samely (2015-08-24 22:46:12+00:00): Hi there. Thanks for your feedback. I've been working based on TIGER, and I will consider your suggestion. Thanks again for fix them.
MikeN (2015-08-30 21:34:21+00:00): Hi, I also found that this changeset moved more than 35,000 nodes.  What was the reference used in moving those nodes?  Thank you
samely (2015-08-31 14:29:57+00:00): Hey there. I just tried to align the edited area based on Bing satellite imagery. Thanks for the comments again.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-25 11:21:09+00:00): Does http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235295038 really go straight through a fence here?  It seems unlikely.
calfarome (2015-05-26 04:08:10+00:00): Thanks for your observation, I had an involuntary  error,   fixed the best possible, I will be very careful in my future editions.
chillly (2015-04-15 21:07:41+00:00): Is the postbox really in the middle of the road? :-)
rstamand (2015-04-15 20:59:56+00:00): Philippines #hotosm-task-768 #OpenRoad #osmgeoweek #MapGive Source=WorldView-2, DigitalGlobe, NextView, 2013 and 2014
hendrik-17 (2015-04-30 15:58:38+00:00): Two ways of this changeset do not have tags:
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338695692
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338695692
bahnpirat (2015-04-30 22:40:14+00:00): fixed.
flohoff (2015-04-16 06:16:10+00:00): Hi Hagar,
das ist ein riesen Changeset - den habe ich im achavi viewer zwar auf bekommen aber schön ist das nicht ;) 

Vielleicht magst du die demnächst wegen der nachvollziehbarkeit ein bischen kleiner machen - Ab und zu mal upload drücken ist vielleicht nicht so schlecht - Nur weil der josm so super stabil geworden ist ... ;)

Danke für die viele Arbeit in Halle und umgebung ;)

Flo
WiebkeCHH (2015-04-16 11:47:19+00:00): Hi Flo,
Ok! Ich hatte gestern Abend ein längeres Telefonat und da der Traces ja so schön halbautomatisch vor sich hin läuft, habe ich nicht mehr drauf geachtet, wie groß das wurde. Sorry!
SK53 (2016-06-17 09:16:52+00:00): I wonder if you discussed this import before carrying it out. It appears to have lots of duplicate nodes and areas labelled as forest which are clearly small groups of individual trees.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-28 11:24:15+00:00): ainda existe isso: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338703355 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338703346?
mweper (2015-04-15 23:26:13+00:00): Aurora. El circulo que hiciste está mal, ya que no representa la realidad. Yo ya corregí eso, basándome en las imágenes satelitales.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4793487

Por favor, lee esto antes de seguir: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_practice
Fabychumi (2015-04-16 00:15:59+00:00): Nuevas correcciones
tosky (2015-06-27 23:31:49+00:00): Tralasciando il fatto che il punto "pompa aria bicicletta ecc" c'è già accanto (e tralasciando le maiuscole), perché attribuire quell'attività all'intero edificio, quando c'è il bar che merita un suo punto? La mappatura così non è corretta.
BladeTC (2015-04-16 01:48:37+00:00): Deu errado essa changeset. Foram modificações não previstas. Será revertida.
naoliv (2015-04-16 02:01:21+00:00): Leandro, legal que você começou a adicionar objetos no mapa.
Só tem um pequeno detalhe: não precisa colocar que a igreja é católica no nome dela (porque já está especificado isso no tipo dela).
Se você souber o nome da igreja, coloque. Se não souber então pode deixar o nome vazio mesmo.
MarvinMep (2015-04-16 03:29:21+00:00): Descrição errada: trata-se da Praça Professor Pinheiro Guimarães e pequenas correções no final da Av. Maracanã.
ij_ (2015-05-04 19:44:14+00:00): hups, söit tässä liikennemerkin vahingossa keskelle katua...

...Koitanpi korjailla itse revertillä tuon.
Vincent de Phily (2015-04-16 09:57:24+00:00): OSM is a collaborative project. We all work on the same data. Changes you make here are presented to the community, so you should only contribute information that exists in real life. If you want to experiement in a sandbox, use the iD editor's tutorial mode.
ToniE (2015-04-16 09:58:49+00:00): Hallo Julia,

hmm, wie soll ich's sagen?

Diese Vorgehen hat in München vor einigen Jahren zu heftigen Diskussionen und im Nachhinein zum Löschen der Informationen "name=" an straßenbegleitenden Fuß-/Radwegen geführt.
Das könnte nun auch wieder passieren. D.h. Deine Arbeit wäre dann u.U. vergeblich.

Irgendwie sollte es aber einen Weg geben, diese Art von Informationen für den MVV-Radroutenplaner (daran arbietet Ihr bei MDV doch, oder?) verfügbar zu machen.

Wie wäre es mit einer Ankündigung/Diskussion auf der Mailingliste "[Talk-De]"? 

Viele Grüße,
Toni
drolbr_mdv (2015-04-16 10:58:57+00:00): Hallo Toni,

nicht unbedingt nur um den Radroutenplaner. Auch andere Routing-Engines haben das gleiche Problem. Die Graphhopper-Engine scheint von den Namen ebenfalls zu profitieren.

Trotzdem ist es aber sinnvoll, das Vorgehen auf talk-de zu dokumentieren. Ich werde das gleich mal tun.

Viele Grüße,

Roland
streckenkundler (2015-04-16 12:51:07+00:00): Hallo,

Ich schlage vor, der Wanderweg-Relation ein network=rwn zu geben. 

Wanderwege mit roten und blauen Balken haben in der Regel einen regionalen oder nationalen Charakter und stehen in der Bedeutsamkeit über denen mit grünen oder gelben Balken.

Viele Grüße,
Sven... der sich immer freut, wen Wanderwege hinzukommen...

PS: http://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/de/?zoom=12&lat=52.01799&lon=14.67482&hill=0# kennst du?
streckenkundler (2015-04-16 12:39:37+00:00): Ich hab noch den Highway-Tag auf construction gesetzt. Kannst du eine Aussage treffen über eine eventuell geänderte Wegeführung des Gurkenradweges? 

Eventuell könne er über die angrenzende Brücke:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.84029&mlon=14.23290#map=17/51.84029/14.23289&layers=N
geführt werden...

Danke,

Sven
maraf24 (2015-04-16 11:10:05+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/348444
(treść notatki powinna być w komentarzu do zmian)
Владимир К (2017-04-13 13:19:59+00:00): водоем и яму надо исправлять.
Skippern (2015-04-16 12:04:29+00:00): Esplica este para mim, tem algum barreira ai, ou a via fui tirado? Se fui instalado um barreira, favor mapear este. Es a via fui tirado, favor adicionar noexit=yes no termino para evitar ele se reconnetado. Também se este e para ser tirado permanente, limpa os relações no local (tem um no_left_turn que no momento gerando aviso do erro)
robbieonsea (2015-04-16 23:49:37+00:00): Probably would have been easier to tag it route-->disused:route instead.

Thus restoring it (if/when it returns) is simple.
freeExec (2015-04-16 12:30:07+00:00): Не поверишь, но комментария к правкам читают. Не ленитесь их писать.
SomeoneElse (2015-04-20 12:24:04+00:00): What are the current access rights on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338787736/history ?  There was a path here previously marked as private http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315390104/history ; has the "private" sign been removed?
axc97c (2015-04-20 13:38:16+00:00): Definatly no sign there at moment. A large part of this area was closed last year for the redevelopment of the bike trails here. It has now fully reopened.
axc97c (2015-04-20 13:39:08+00:00): Just a quick question. The bike park area just south of the trail you mentioned isnt showing on the maps. What do I need to tag that as to make it display correctly?
axc97c (2015-04-20 13:43:23+00:00): From the north, there is no entry to several of the tracks here also, as it is one way only
SomeoneElse (2015-05-09 08:22:57+00:00): Re the "bike park" what exactly is it?  I've tagged an MTB area to the west as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270878792 , maybe that would work?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-03 16:04:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338788344/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
naoliv (2015-04-16 12:57:15+00:00): mmorgado, se eu bem entendi, a via deve continuar conectada e ter um nó nela com barrier=bollard + access=no (você pode colocar foot=yes se permitir acesso de pedestre e bicycle=yes para bicicletas)
tosky (2015-04-16 16:08:18+00:00): Questa via si sovrappone a strade esistenti: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338794969

La mappa di OSM non è il posto dove inserire le proprie tracce GPX, come sembra in questo caso. Ho annullato la modifica.
Skippern (2015-04-16 13:26:37+00:00): Assim voce deveria fazer https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30264637
mmorgado (2015-04-16 13:30:27+00:00): Não existe passagem para pedestres nem ciclistas
Skippern (2015-04-16 13:32:00+00:00): como e a barreira?
Skippern (2015-04-16 13:33:00+00:00): tem algum fotos para mostrar? por exemplo no Mapillary.com, ou um gravação do GoPro voce pode compartilhar?
mmorgado (2015-04-16 13:40:19+00:00): Não Skippern
Esta estrada era a BR-259 antes da construção da ponte nova sobre o rio manhuaçú
Agora colocaram uma barreira de AÇO (aquelas de curvas perigosas) separando totalmente as estradas
Skippern (2015-04-16 13:41:26+00:00): geralmente barrier=bullard não vai bloquear pedestres, assim com barrier=bullard assumindo que ha passagem de pedestres, se a barreira e do outro tipo, muda o tag barrier=* para identificar o tipo de barrier. foot=no e bicycle=no geralmente não e necessário com access=no (exempto algum casos especiais)
Skippern (2015-04-16 13:48:21+00:00): Então nao e barrier=bullard, mas um linha de barrier=guard_rail que compartilhando no com a rua, este no deve ter access=no alem do corta o pedaço entre o barreira e o BR-259, manter o tag de highway mas adicionar access=no
mmorgado (2015-04-16 15:07:45+00:00): Assim ?
Skippern (2015-04-16 15:39:14+00:00): Assim http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30267544
dzamper (2015-04-20 19:53:35+00:00): Na pewno droga znajduje się pod hałdą? Przecież dopiero co została odbudowana...
sorbovit (2015-04-20 20:19:34+00:00): Ok, przywróciłem stan sprzed zmiany, dawno mnie tam wobec tego nie było ;-)
RicoElectrico (2023-02-03 13:48:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3506824
NorthCrab (2023-02-03 14:21:26+00:00): Oj ale żeby tak komentować po 8 latach :D Może się po prostu zmieniło i trzeba zaktualizować mapę.
Supaplex (2015-04-16 17:23:03+00:00): 讚！恭喜你第100次編輯。看到樹林、板橋越來越多資料，真得很高興
Skippern (2015-04-16 13:50:27+00:00): Faixa de pedestre deve somente ser o no onde o trilha de pedestres cruzam o estrada, com highway=crossing, como voce mapeando nao ha efeito no roteamento, mas gerando muitos erros no sistemas de controle de qualidade
naoliv (2015-04-16 13:51:06+00:00): Toninho, as faixas de pedestrem não são mapeadas assim. Esses pequenos caminhos que você traçou onde se localizam as faixas de pedestres estão incorretos.
Você só insere um nó na rua e este nó vai conter, pelo menos, highway=crossing
4rch (2015-04-27 08:14:21+00:00): Hello Golovco Anatolie, I had to remove Liberland. If you want to map fictional states please use http://opengeofiction.net/

Best regards, Arch
mitzip (2015-04-28 00:31:29+00:00): Arch, According to Serbian Govt. GIS, that area is Croatian territory. Why did you map it as Serbian?

http://www.geosrbija.rs/rga/default.aspx?gui=1&lang=1&minX=333328.74651985&minY=5070180.8965034&maxX=336817.83421689&maxY=5072351.5606656&layers=435&baselayer=100003&visibleOLOverlays&hc_location=ufi
Milooslav (2015-04-28 07:33:32+00:00): Liberland is real, but very new state (viz http://liberland.org). 
For saving and rendering OSM data will be able (as soon as possible) GIS online application on http://liberland-urbandesign.org
4rch (2015-04-28 08:06:18+00:00): Liberland has no physical control in the mentioned area. It is not recognized by any other state.

Please read the following document (paragraph "borders and boundaries") from the OSM Foundation: http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf
4rch (2015-04-28 08:09:24+00:00): @mitzip: I've restored the border line before Liberland was added. Please take into account that borders may be approximate in areas without clearly defined borders: http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf