piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-10 16:12:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:11:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:15:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:14:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:13:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:15:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:13:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:12:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:16:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:11:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:12:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:12:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:11:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:11:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:15:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:14:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:14:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:15:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:12:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:12:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:15:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
Phyks (2018-12-07 10:37:28+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OSM,

La modification apportée sur l'impasse a ajouté le nom correct en name:fr (nom français) mais a laissé le nom initial dans le champ name (nom général de l'objet) : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50313707

Je pense qu'il faudrait plutôt modifier le champ "name" pour n'avoir qu'un seul nom, "rue du Vieux Moulin".

Bonne journée,
mavl (2018-12-10 16:15:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:11:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
Филиппок (2018-12-26 16:39:23+00:00): В Алма-Атах понаставили остановок а пассажиры стоят  в другом месте ,просто лень идти до неё.
pitfire (2021-05-24 10:04:31+00:00): Hallo Der Troisdorfer,
dein Änderungssatz: 65261600 Siegburg Peterstraße (142938492, v3) hat die Einträge "lanes - 2" und "narrow=yes" 
Nach meiner Ansicht und Befahrung mit dem Rad ist das aber eine Einbahnstrasse mit einer Fahrspur ohne Mittelstreifen und ohne "narrow=yes-verengten Abschnitt des Weges" 
Kannst Du dir das nochmal anschauen.
Gruß pitfire
mavl (2018-12-10 16:12:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
ynx (2018-12-16 21:47:04+00:00): Не очень понял, насчёт отката. так как точка всё ещё на месте. Но это явно лишняя точка - она стоит не там, содержит некорректные данные и дублирует точку на соседнем здании.
mavl (2018-12-17 04:09:10+00:00): Не было отката этой точки, так как эту точку уже успели изменить.
ynx (2018-12-17 11:00:08+00:00): Спасибо. А то просто смутил первый комментарий. Тогда я её удалю.
mavl (2018-12-10 16:13:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
katpatuka (2021-09-13 11:46:46+00:00): Uydu resimleri bakarak askeri alan gibi pek gelmedi bana (way 653334728) - daha çok tarla gibi. Ne dersin ? ;)
mavl (2018-12-10 16:13:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:14:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:11:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:12:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
R0bst3r (2018-12-10 07:44:10+00:00): Hallo miltonjohn,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe folgende Anmerkungen:
* Du hast hier aus 5 Stolpersteinen 4 gemacht. War das beabsichtigt?
* Das Verschieben der Marker dürfte unnötig sein, da die Steine wahrscheinlich nicht mehrere Meter auseinander liegen. Wenn man auch nicht 100% die Wirklichkeit abbilden kann, fand ich das vorherige passender. Die Darstellung auf einer Karte sollten wir dem Renderer überlassen ...
Zur Einführung empfehle ich den Beginners' guide auf wiki.osm.org. Dort findet man auch Anleitungen zu allen Themen. 
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65261940
DD1GJ (2018-12-10 08:14:23+00:00): Diese Änderung wurde bereits vor 3 Tagen rückgängig gemacht.

Hallo miltonjohn, zur Erklärung: OpenStreetMap ist eine Geodatenbank und auf der Karte unter openstreetmap.org ist nur die Spitze des Eisberges sichtbar, da es sonst zu unübersichtlich wird. Daher wird an dieser Stelle nur das Symbol, aber keine Name angezeigt.

Speziell zur Anzeige der Stolpersteine gibt es z.B.

http://www.historic.place/themes/stolpersteine/index.html?zoom=16&lat=48.70396&lon=9.65336&layers=B0000TT

Wenn Du auf einen Standort klickst, wird das Bündel aufgelöst und die Steine einzeln dargestellt. Weitere Informationen findest Du auch unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
mavl (2018-12-10 16:13:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:15:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
Supaplex (2019-02-06 15:51:09+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
安格拉 (2018-12-11 21:29:55+00:00): Dear Brian,

you've mapped a lake ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653336901 ) at a place were a much better version was already existing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529754593

So I'm asking myself - why?
Brian@Brea (2018-12-12 09:03:07+00:00): Sorry, My map did not render the area when I scrolled over it and mapped it over again. I have removed the duplicate ways and it appears that I'm not the only one as other lakes in the area have multiple map overs too.
mavl (2018-12-10 16:14:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
pra_veen (2019-04-15 10:33:50+00:00):  Hi Aulia Ishmata,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across way 653336946 classified as 'UnClassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
Please look into this and share your observations

Thanks in advance.
mavl (2018-12-10 16:11:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:12:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:14:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
maraf24 (2018-12-16 13:14:20+00:00): Numery dróg dajemy w ref gdy można je odczytać w terenie. Jeśli nie, to idą do unsigned_ref.
B_KSL (2018-12-16 15:36:57+00:00): Ok, zgadza się. Dodałem numery między Nowym Targiem a Gorlicami tam gdzie ich nie było. Przy okazji, łącząc różne odcinki zaplątały się te z unsigned_ref na kilku drogach w okolicy Limanowej. Nieuwaga. Poprawię.Przy okazji pytanie: tam gdzie nie wiem czy w terenie są oznaczone - dodać numer w ref czy nie dodawać wcale?
maraf24 (2018-12-16 16:50:27+00:00): Ja dla dróg gminnych i powiatowych dawałbym z automatu do unsigned_ref, bo rzadko kiedy te numery można zobaczyć w terenie.
Albo do official_ref, to w żaden sposób nie sugeruje widoczności lub jej braku.
B_KSL (2018-12-16 20:55:34+00:00): przywrócone
SHARCRASH (2018-12-11 14:29:54+00:00): Why buildings inside buildings???
SHARCRASH (2018-12-11 14:30:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653337442/history
AndersAndersson (2018-12-07 23:42:06+00:00): Don't remove roads. If you are not allowed to drive on them, change road class instead.
mavl (2018-12-10 16:15:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:12:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
tux67 (2018-12-07 13:19:29+00:00): Hallo Karl Motif
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern. Bei der con die erfassten Kamera hast du (ggf. unwissentlich) einen 2. direction Wert erfasst (direction_1=180) dieser wird nicht ausgewertet und kann gelöscht werden.
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst. Eine Quellenangabe wäre ggf. auch noch wünschenswert. In diesem Fall nehme ich mal an eine eigene Beobachtung. Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.
Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
Stephan (tux67)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65262317
mavl (2018-12-10 16:14:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-12-10 16:13:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
FrankXF (2018-12-16 23:20:00+00:00): public_transport:version fehlt bei relation SB59
SomeoneElse (2018-12-09 12:54:54+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain the changeset comment "Names added." here?  What you appear to have done is change the name of a number of things from the correct "St James" to the grammatically incorrect "St. James" (with a full stop).  FWIW National Rail's app actually has the station name as "St James's Park" but I don't think they're the station operators here so I'd let a local fix the name.
Best Regards,
Andy
stadiaarcadia (2018-12-09 20:08:43+00:00): Hi Andy, St. James really is the official name, although St James also is used. Check out the official Newcastle United site: https://www.nufc.co.uk/stadium They also use St. and not St
SomeoneElse (2018-12-09 20:36:56+00:00): Ha! So they do...
lakedistrict (2018-12-09 22:21:21+00:00): Former local mapper here: "St. James' Park" is the name on the stadium signs and "St James" is the name on the metro station signs. I've fixed the station name in changeset 5326684
mueschel (2018-12-19 11:38:33+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node? The payment and phone tags seem to be wrong.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4735960160

Thanks, Jan
kartonage (2018-12-07 17:46:27+00:00): Hi, 

sind das irgendwie Testchangesets? Weil es hier heute eine handvoll Changesets ohne nennenswerte Änderung gab und das Gebäude nun ein unpassendes levels-Tag anstelle des building:levels-Tags hat.

Schöne Grüße
osmbuildings (2018-12-08 03:05:12+00:00): Hallo,
Danke für die Hinweise. Hier sind tatsächlich ein paar Änderungen zuviel raus gegangen.
Das Tag wird korrigiert. Daher in Kürze noch ein Change.
Viele Grüße
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-12-07 09:51:02+00:00): przepraszam tu źródłem miało być "survey"
mavl (2018-12-10 16:15:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65348923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
Eberth (2018-12-07 11:14:08+00:00): Du hast offenbar den gesamten Wald auf der Montabaurer Höhe gelöscht.
Hast Du das im Blick und wirst das bei den angekündigten weiteren Bearbeitungen korrigieren?
Ansonsten wäre vielleicht ein Revert des Änderungssatzes sinnvoll.

Viele Grüße

Thomas
berndw (2018-12-07 12:08:07+00:00): Dieses Riesenpolygon war schwierig, deswegn habe ich das sicherheitshalber in mehreren Schritten bearbeitet und  hochgeladen. Deswegen auch mein inweis 'noch nicht fertig' ;-)

Aktuell ist der Wald wieder da, ich denke mal ich werde auch nichts mehr kaputt machen.
BTW: Auch jetzt sind die MP noch sehr groß, da sollte noch was dran getan werden.
Eberth (2018-12-07 12:51:25+00:00): Ah, perfekt, es ist wieder alles grün auf der Montabaurer Höhe.
Wenn ich Zeit habe, schau ich mal, ob ich das Riesenpolygon noch ein wenig aufteilen kann.
Hast Du eine Strategie beim Aufteilen, die sich bewährt hat? Also z. B. wo du Grenzen setzt?
berndw (2018-12-07 13:11:51+00:00): Ich trenne an Landestraßen aufwärts, bzw. Eisenbahn. Ansonsten wo es sinnvoll erscheint.
Bei diesen Riesenolygon waren die innenliegende Flächen das größte Problem, ich hoffe ich habe alle gefunden.
Kannst Du mal kontrollieren?

Bernd
P.s.: Ich erstelle gerne MPs aber so was sollte verboten werden ;-)
kreuzschnabel (2019-08-15 17:52:12+00:00): Danke fürs MP-Aufdröseln, aber ich habe den leisen Eindruck, dass du dabei die Autobahn-Rampe Richtung Frankfurt, die ich ein Jahr zuvor schön sauber ausgerundet hatte, wieder etwas eckiger gestaltet hast :) ist behoben.
pkn (2018-12-07 11:10:28+00:00): Moin Can, da ist dir ein Punkt beim Harpener Hellweg verrutscht. Der macht nun einen heftigen "Schlencker" nach Osten...
Gruß
Peter
c3112n (2018-12-07 11:18:25+00:00): Danke Peter, habe ich schon gesehen. Mit der iD baut man gerne Mist.
Ist jetzt hoffentlich wieder in Ordnung.
pkn (2018-12-07 11:52:41+00:00): Jep, passt wieder. Ich nehme meistens den JOSM. Da kann man auch schnell Mist bauen... ;-)
viloan (2018-12-07 10:33:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2018-12-19 11:45:30+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "epis" to severl guest houses. This is not used in other places, what does it mean?

Jan
Anakil (2018-12-19 12:03:35+00:00): Hi,
It is a regional (local) classification of guest houses (documentation (in french) : http://pro.ftlb.be/index.php/votre-secteur/tourisme-de-terroir/229-epis ), and it is an undocumented tag as i created it for these guest house.
I added the information in partnership with the local tourism office (as they needed a proof-of-concept of what we can put in OSM), but i was not sure if i should propose this new tag (probably only used here in Wallonia, not entire Belgium) or i should use more common tags like stars=* ("stars" tag represent something different than "épis" in its regional definition here). Thus i kept this as a "local custom tag" for the time being as we didn't agree on something in the local community (and it is always easy to bulk change a simple tag like that if needed).

Anakil
Anakil (2018-12-19 12:06:23+00:00): Apparently, France also use this classification name "épis" for their guest houses... And in some case a place can both have stars and "epis" (these two classifications are made by two different organisations).
mueschel (2018-12-19 12:17:38+00:00): I guess we can find more local classification systems for hotels and similar. I would opt for a more general top_level tag that also conveys the information that it is about categories. How about something like "local_category" or similar?
Anakil (2018-12-19 13:12:46+00:00): I'm not opposed to a more general term. i'm not sure if something like "local_category" is good enough, maybe a namespace would be better ? 
But then why use "stars" as a key ? As locally (i mean in the region of Wallonia, as we make everything differently in Belgium ^_^), stars are only for hotel, epis for guest_house (and similar thing like Bed & breakfeast) and we also have a similar rating for "tourism attraction" with 'soleil' (litterally 'sun') as the words "attraction touristiques" (french translation of tourism attraction) are a protected designation. 
I will bring it to the mailing list talk-be (or tagging) it would be easier ahah. ;-)
mueschel (2018-12-19 19:03:58+00:00): "Suns" or "flowers" are also used in at least some German speaking regions.  Is there somewhere a region of more than one local system that is worth tagging? If not, we don't need a namespace.
mavl (2019-07-23 20:52:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
robert (2018-12-23 13:24:25+00:00): Think you managed to remove the name "Peacehaven" in this edit, breaking a match: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=579509

Deliberate?