piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 12:26:59+00:00): Hello!

I know that it is an ancient edit, but maybe you are still mapping in this area...

What you meant by https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3009881988/history ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)
bkil (2023-03-22 16:22:55+00:00): Maybe this? But what made you investigate this POI Mateusz Konieczny? https://facebook.com/people/Internet-Call-Shop/100032396153325/
kdano (2023-03-22 22:30:22+00:00): I checked my old photo -- I guess this was indeed an internet cafe.
But I would assume that the facility no longer exists. Unfortunately I cannot check it right now, but I believe the whole building is being remodeled. I'd recommend deleting the node.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-23 08:55:59+00:00): > But what made you investigate this POI Mateusz Konieczny?

I am trying to clean up a bit unusual shop values, in some cases solution is obvious due to typos or similar - in some I ask people who added it
SK53 (2015-01-29 21:43:45+00:00): These woods along these river valleys do not exist. Yes there are patches of willows, and some willow scrub in places, but these are tiny. In populated places there will be rows of poplars to act as windbreaks. Otherwise this is Patagonia one of the famous treeless places in the world. Having recently travelled along these valleys I know how rare trees actually are. I will try and add some sequences on Mapillary.

Also the way is much too large, such that it is impractical to edit in some editors.
Владимир К (2017-03-15 09:23:02+00:00): вы выруюки обозначаете лугами
SomeoneElse (2019-06-11 22:43:21+00:00): Hello,
I hope you don't mind me commenting on a very old changeset.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38321918/history has "source=Google Maps" here.  We can't actually use Google Maps for the reasons set out at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F , although here the geometry has been significantly edited since this edit and the name is available from OS OpenData, so if anything did come from Google Maps, it's not really in OSM any more.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
eggie (2022-10-13 10:37:50+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstbericht ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SMP (2014-11-04 11:48:18+00:00): :-O per què vau eliminar l'estació de Congrés? Ara miraré de restaurar-la.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-19 13:19:44+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297217604/history#map=18/41.88520/-74.31933 has name and that it is "Unknwon"?
mavl (2018-12-20 16:15:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-20 16:14:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-20 16:14:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-20 16:14:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-20 16:14:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-20 16:13:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2018-12-20 16:12:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
luschi (2015-05-31 19:10:05+00:00): hier hast du doch etwas mit "fixme" übertrieben. Dass Telefon, Website, Name, usw. fehlen sieht man auch ohne fixme.
Bitte ändere das.
LG
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-03 09:29:08+00:00): Czy dodałeś to na podstawie wizyty na miejscu czy czegoś innego?

Bo w terenie nie ma jakichkolwiek nawet śladów
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-01-03 09:33:04+00:00): I tak, 8 lat minęło ale jak to dało się mapować jako cmentarz z zdefiniowanym obszarem to wymagało to celowej dewastacji by nic nie zostało.
RussNelson (2014-12-25 03:25:04+00:00): Why do you say this is missing? It looks present on Bing, Bing birds-eye, and Google. The geometry of this way alone suggests that it shouldn't be missing.
dieterdreist (2022-08-05 22:33:30+00:00): su via del mare hai aggiunto tanti tags =no che non capsico perché, ad esempio non ho mai visto un cartello per foot=no…
Warin61 (2019-03-21 01:56:52+00:00): HI,
Node 3011855842 has name only ... needs tags to say what it is...

There are a number of these .. take a look at 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=145.93448&lat=-41.06283&zoom=11&opacity=0.76&overlays=nodes_with_empty_k,ways_with_empty_k,nodes_with_empty_v,ways_with_empty_v,node_tags_with_whitespace,way_tags_with_whitespace,node_with_unusual_char,way_with_unusual_char,node_with_short_or_long_key,way_with_short_or_long_key,nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways,no_feature_tag_nodes,no_feature_tag_ways,ways_without_tags
SomeoneElse (2022-02-11 23:55:49+00:00): Hello Mikikiki,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 7 years ago. On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3012088324 . We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2022-02-11 23:56:22+00:00): Witaj Mikikiki,

Mam nadzieję, że nie masz nic przeciwko, że pytam o edycję sprzed 7 lat. W tym zestawie zmian dodałeś tag „source=Google” w węźle https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3012088324 . W rzeczywistości nie możemy użyć tego jako źródła w OSM, ponieważ licencja Google nie pozwala na użycie go tutaj – spowodowałoby to prawdziwe problemy dla projektu, gdybyśmy odkryli, że używamy Google Maps jako źródła.
Jeśli jest to miejsce, które znasz, wtedy „source=local_knowledge” byłoby w porządku.

Z poważaniem
Andy Townsend, w imieniu Grupy Roboczej ds. Danych OSM
Peilscheibe (2015-03-18 15:07:17+00:00): Passage time for Écluses de Fonserannes was set to 30 min in this changeset. I heavily disbelieve this. Apart from this value, it could make sense to distinguish into downstream/upstream times.
Krillle (2015-03-18 15:21:37+00:00): This is of course an average time and includes waiting for lock opening. It is used for calculation traveling times.
Do you believe in shorter or longer average passage times?
Peilscheibe (2015-03-19 12:02:00+00:00): That's interesting. On which data is this average calculated? Is the data publicly available?
And, if you want to calculate travelling time, did you consider opening hours of the locks? High-season's traffic volume? Additionally, at the mentioned Écluses de Fonserannes there are timeframes for downstream/upstream locking, this may also impact travelling time. 
btw, at Écluses de Fonserannes we had 35 minutes waiting time and 40 minutes locking time downstream at low-season.
Krillle (2015-03-19 14:00:19+00:00): The traveling time is calculated by our iPad app Rivers & Seas (http://riversandseas.de). A special app for inland navigation.
We are running this app and added the needed tagging. 
The 30 min average is estimated. You're welcome to correct this to better estimated values.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-07-02 05:53:09+00:00): image:classroom and image:outside went dead

is it possible to fix them? Or should we just remove them?

See for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2964135582/history merged into https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/585451595/history
ForstEK (2019-05-19 09:52:12+00:00): Здравствуйте, adensistema! Спасибо за вклад в редактирование карты, однако при этом надо соблюдать определённую систему обозначений. Для булочной (пекарни) используется тэг shop=bakery (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop%3Dbakery)
skquinn (2019-05-11 04:21:43+00:00): "JJ's carry out" node 297372151 -- how did the words "open now" wind up in the middle of the value of opening_hours? Was this copy-pasted from somewhere else?
eggie (2019-08-02 10:47:40+00:00): Al een ouder account, maar nu pas weer een nieuwe edit...alsnog welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
d1g (2016-06-27 12:10:36+00:00): Hello! 

Please consider re-tagging place=city_block as place=neighbourhood, this tag was approved for small parts of the city like this, long time before this changeset:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/place%3Dneighbourhood

All candidates can be found here:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/4O6
marczoutendijk (2021-11-30 20:43:35+00:00): Hoi,
Klopt dit nog?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2561533081

amenity=natuur komt maar 1 keer voor en name=ransuilen kan beter description worden.
Nakaner (2015-06-28 21:38:41+00:00): Kannst du mir mal bitte erklären, warum du diesen Node eingetragen hast? Der Blitzer ist schon gemappt und ich habe heute dort nur einen gesehen (hat mich nicht erwischt). https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3012841926/history Der andere (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1105366186/history) ist schon seit 2011, auch als Relation, gemappt. OsmAnd unterstützt Relationen, daher ist das kein Argument.
Andreas Binder (2016-02-01 19:49:18+00:00): Was möchtest Du uns mit damit sagen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3012957586
Sir Lancelot (2016-02-09 18:57:14+00:00): Vertippt noch mal...
da wollte ich einen Wegepunkt anlegen und nicht einsenden, der mir sagt, dass ich auf einen Track Grade 2 gestoßen bin. Hat "JWL" aber schon erledigt. Punkt gelöscht.
phyzome (2015-06-20 14:08:28+00:00): I might be confused by the interface, but it looks like you removed building=yes from http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29827142 -- is that intentional?
sendelhorst (2015-03-15 15:36:30+00:00): Warum hast Du korrekte Änderungen aus 20552097 in diesem Changeset 24715850 rückgängig gemacht???? Hast Du einen total veralteten Spielserver als Basis genommen????
heilbron (2015-03-15 19:18:29+00:00): Erst einmal Danke für die freundliche Anrede ;-) Wie Du siehst, ist der Changeset 24715850 schon sieben Monate alt. Es ließe sich leichter klären, wenn Du sagst, um welche Abweichungen es Dir geht. (Die Frage zum "Spielserver" finde ich unangemessen)
warangal (2018-08-07 22:54:47+00:00): Have you discussed this mechanical edit? If not it must be reverted since the Wiki is clear about this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power=sub_station
Sander H (2018-08-08 18:23:49+00:00): I don't think reverting a 4 year old changeset is going to be easy. 
Think it was an autofix in JOSM back then and just did the entire country. Don't think I ever looked up the wiki to notice the warning. Maybe not the best decision, but that's what happened...
Sander H (2018-08-15 16:20:12+00:00): Just happened I was notified again about this, and this changeset was already reverted partially: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24789993
gorn (2015-02-01 03:03:30+00:00): Můžete prosím ověřit že u benzinové pumpy jsou skutečně DVA rozcestníky? Není ten východnější spíš stará informace?
lenochod (2015-02-02 13:55:10+00:00): Ahoj.
Přímo naproti benzince přes silnici jsou tabulky pro pěší turistiku.
Na straně co je benzínka tak jsou nejprve tabulky pro zelenou okružní cyklotrasu č. 4197.
A vzdálenější (na konci parkoviště) je cedule zde začínající cyklotrasy č. 4259.

Lukáš
gorn (2015-02-03 00:06:12+00:00): Děkuju za ověření, nemáte fotky těch rozcestníků? Zvláště mě zajímají ty cyklistické, ale i ten turistický. Zkouším trochu pohnout se značenými trasami a hodilo by se to. A máte info o průběhu 4259? V relaci 3376285 je toho velmi málo. Začátek je na východ po silnici 29825?
lenochod (2015-08-12 12:31:14+00:00): Mám fotky, kam je mám zaslat??
Co vím tak od rozcestníku pro 4259 míří po silnici k obci Hoděšovice.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-10 18:36:53+00:00): Can you maybe remember why you selected shop tags in this ancient edit?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2492977
Govanus (2016-02-19 17:37:11+00:00): Hi there is a quiry from a user about wether you may have misspelt the name of a staircase as 'Stairecase 8' and we wondered if it was an intential spelling or a mistake?
The note is at:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/493340
eggie (2019-10-26 20:21:41+00:00): Na 5 jaar weer een edit , maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen Bij deze alsnog
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Rps333 (2015-10-26 13:14:53+00:00): Why did you relabel the the range?
konu (2015-10-26 22:31:41+00:00): The distance markers used the highway key, making them show up as streets in OsmAnd street searches. Using boundary:marker solved this problem.
Rps333 (2015-10-27 11:54:28+00:00): But I wanted to see the the paths on OsmAnd and OSM.org. The markers are real paths on the ground.
konu (2015-10-27 21:42:42+00:00): Can you find a way to tag the paths that will not make them show up in OsmAnd's address search? That was the objective with my changeset.
Rps333 (2015-10-28 18:25:20+00:00): What about we tag it as a path, but remove the name. ie 500m
konu (2015-10-29 01:07:54+00:00): Yes, that is a good idea. Please make this change at your convenience.
Constable (2016-08-28 10:20:25+00:00): hey sir, what's that thing?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2309529809
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:45:56+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297576741
has no tags. What is it?
Peda (2017-03-27 11:49:48+00:00): Actually I have no idea but I suppose it's a highway=residential. I have no idea as this way had been remote-mapped via an HOT task two years ago.
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:21:33+00:00): May I ask that you either tag it as highway=residential or delete it?
Peda (2017-03-27 13:10:36+00:00): Sure, done.
tyr_asd (2016-07-27 09:37:37+00:00): Zur Info: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/642399
d1g (2015-01-13 09:19:18+00:00): Сейчас понял что часть "посёлка Юриш" может зря удалил у улиц когда часть города указывал. Табличкам в частном секторе верить нельзя, нужно постоянных жильцов спрашивать или паспорт смотреть.
d1g (2015-01-13 09:21:14+00:00): Про "часть города" эта линия: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135969081/history
zstadler (2016-05-10 19:43:10+00:00): bahnpirat,
In changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39226685 I've made updates to mapping you did in this changeset.

I would appreciate if you could review the changes, as I'm not familiar with power lines mapping.
Zeev
GerdP (2015-11-02 14:19:26+00:00): please review relation 3959384:
the tag highway=lwn looks like a typo.
What is meant here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3959384
RobJN (2015-11-02 19:07:36+00:00): fixed. I meant hiking=lwn as per the wiki
GerdP (2015-11-02 19:17:08+00:00): ahh, should have found that on my own. Thanks for the feedback.
marc__marc (2020-11-15 23:54:30+00:00): Hello,
what's your meaning of class=* gas_link ?
class key was depreciated in 2006 and  was used to describe the importance of a road.
it's a man_made=pipeline substance=gas usage=link ?
Regards,
Marc
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-28 20:34:24+00:00): Zerknniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2516145#map=19/52.24496/21.08955 ?
GerdP (2022-07-28 07:47:02+00:00): Moin!
Du hast hier das bicycle=designated vom Weg https://www.osm.org/way/217452642 entfernt. Sieht für mich auf dem Luftbild aber nach einem ganz normalen straßenbegl. Radweg aus. Ebenso am nördlichen Ende dieser Weg: https://www.osm.org/way/297714771
Evtl. ein Versehen?
user_53559 (2022-07-28 16:07:22+00:00): Moin, bezüglich des Luftbilds stimme ich dir zu! Da ich solch eine Änderung nie durchführen würde, wenn ich nicht persönlich vor Ort bin, kann es sich nur um ein Versehen handeln...
Oddstr13 (2015-02-28 08:15:32+00:00): "Erikssætrin" er flere gårdsbruk.
Deler av en vei fjernet.

Hva er din kilde for disse data?
anderfo (2015-02-28 09:17:36+00:00): Hei,
veger og stier er stort sett tegnet på bakgrunn av GPS-spor (fra meg selv og fra Strava), mens navn på gårdsbruk oftest er hentet fra Kartverket/N50.

Jeg ser at FKB viser flere gårdsbruk inne på Eirikssætrin, men FKB er ikke frigitte data, så det kan jeg ikke bruke. Dersom du har bedre info er det bare å gå inn og redigere! :)

Jeg har tegnet inn det aller meste i Oppdalsområdet og forventer ikke at det skal regnes som "perfekt inntegnet" eller skal forbli uberørt. Det er bare å forbedre det!
(Men, NB, ikke bruk Bing satelittfoto, ettersom det har svært mye og variabel offset, som fører til at mye havner på feil sted...)

Hvor er det jeg har fjernet deler av en vei?

Når det gjelder det som er på nordvestsida av Hostoa har jeg en lokal kilde; en kompis av meg bor på Krokåtbekken/Gammelgården. Han har kommet med endel tips, hovedsakelig om stier og skogsbilveger i området.
Jeg husker at jeg fjernet en traktorveg på kartet i nærheten av huset hans en gang i høst, etter å ha vært på besøk og sett at den ikke eksisterte. Det er ikke den vegen du mener?
Oddstr13 (2015-02-28 21:25:15+00:00): Veibiten jeg refererte til var siste biten net til Solvang, Innset. da den aktuelle veien stopper der, og det er en separat vei som fortsetter innover. Har planer om å kartlegge nærområdet her skikkelig, men har ikke kommet skikkelig igang. Har en del GPSer jeg kunne tenkt meg å sette opp til å logge samtidig, så jeg får flere referanser / mere gjenomsnittlig måling på en tur, men har ikke kommet så langt enda. :)

Og, ja, så at bing varierte kraftig med GPS loggene mine, med flere 10m på bare et par km
anderfo (2015-02-28 21:53:25+00:00): OK, håper ikke jeg ødela mye ved Solvang, du må gjerne korrigere... Vegbiten gjennom gårdsbruket sto visst også på N50, så jeg har satt den inn (som service) nå.

Ellers har jeg god erfaring med å dra med meg en gjeng syklister ut i marka for å logge stier - alle har hver sin GPS som logger til Strava, og så kan jeg enkelt få inn Strava-sporene som bakgrunn i JOSM. Da blir det ganske god nøyaktighet på inntegninga, uten at jeg må kjøpe inn (og bære) alle GPS-ene selv...
muralito (2015-02-05 11:01:42+00:00): Revertido. "YPF" va en la etiqueta brand, no en name.
Mazezito (2018-04-01 15:10:16+00:00): Foi adicionado uma edição massiva há existente que tem uma linha de tempo de 4 anos e por isso alguns elementos tiveram de ser alterados e corregidos... foi tomada a atenção para manter a originalidade da edição anterior.
Qualquer advertência é só dizer..
ViriatoLusitano (2018-04-01 15:17:11+00:00): Importação massiva? Que me lembre por estas bandas estava tudo vazio e estive a preencher manualmente.
Mazezito (2018-04-01 21:42:03+00:00): Sim tive de ajustar novos elementos tipo estradas e edifícios para a nova imagem de fundo do bing e as edições que já existiam… Nas minhas ultimas edições também foi feito o mesmo… Como é uma área bastante editada por ti pergunto se esta nos conformes.. Estou aberto a criticas…
canfe (2024-01-30 19:53:02+00:00): Please dont tag building with addr:housenumber
Retired Account (2015-05-27 13:47:10+00:00): This changeset removes all the stations for the M Train. Is this intended to be the case?
GerdP (2015-11-02 14:46:56+00:00): please review: you often used 
multipolygon relations with highway=*
tags. This is very unusual.
Sample:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3961723
I don't see how this area could be related to a parking_aisle ?
demon_box (2018-03-17 15:37:22+00:00): ciao, su questo edificio

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297857906

cosa volevi indicare con il tag (errato)

building=Operazione_Mato_Grosso ?

è una struttura in gestione all'Operazione Mato Grosso?

grazie
Gianmario Salvetti (2018-03-17 15:52:47+00:00): E' un edificio di proprietà dell'Operazione Mato Grosso.
demon_box (2018-03-17 15:56:44+00:00): beh allora puoi mettere:

building=yes
owner=Operazione Mato Grosso

oppure

building=yes
operator=Operazione Mato Grosso

se c'è un'attività gestita da loro che si svolge in questo edificio.
cosa si fa in questo edificio?
Gianmario Salvetti (2018-03-17 16:31:59+00:00): La gestione è su prenotazione. Ospitano gruppi, gestiscono pranzi di nozze, noleggiano la struttura a chi dovesse organizzare qualcosa ... in effetti, non hanno un core business ben definito ... tendono a spaziare ... :)
demon_box (2018-03-17 16:34:22+00:00): ok, allora farei

building=yes
operator=Operazione Mato Grosso

sei d'accordo?
fai tu?

grazie
Gianmario Salvetti (2018-03-17 16:36:35+00:00): Fatto. Grazie.
Mike Baggaley (2015-03-09 13:23:47+00:00): Are you sure the name of the water at way 96215794 is Fish Pond? This seems more like a description.
aharvey (2018-01-19 11:45:36+00:00): Did you mean to mark this as access=private, when I drove past it didn't look private or restricted access.
stedewa (2017-02-09 13:30:12+00:00): Qu'est-ce que c'est le noeud "itre" aux Marécottes?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3017953798
Ralph28 (2016-11-18 22:30:21+00:00): Ja. Ist geschlossen
floscher (2016-11-19 01:14:05+00:00): ???
Ralph28 (2016-11-19 17:34:12+00:00): Steht noch auf der Karte, dass die Post dort sei
Xuacu (2015-01-16 14:16:48+00:00): Hola. ¡Gracias por tus aportaciones a OSM!
Quería recordarte que los nombres en OSM deben ajustarse lo más posible a los reales. ¿El nombre de este restaurante es todo en minúsculas? En caso contrario, habría que cambiarlo al nombre correcto.
Un saludo
Hjart (2015-08-02 12:37:24+00:00): Why did you make 2 parallel tracks north of Bork Havn?
muzirian (2017-04-11 17:30:30+00:00): need review for tags for boundaries :p
VA00 (2017-10-05 18:09:30+00:00): Dlaczego akurat na tym skrzyżowaniu dodałeś tag highway=crossing ? Czy istnienie skrzyżowania nie wynika automatycznie z przecięcia dróg?
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-05 19:13:02+00:00): O które skrzyżowanie chodzi?
VA00 (2017-10-05 19:48:47+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/376525306
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-05 20:22:21+00:00): Zależy jak traktujesz ciąg pieszo-rowerowy po wałach.

Jeśli jako drogę - to rzeczywiście nie ma sensu.

Jeśli traktujesz CPR jako chodnik gdzie rowery mogą (i muszą) jeździć to jest to przejście chodnika przez drogę.
VA00 (2017-10-06 07:03:15+00:00): Jeżeli dobrze pamiętam, jest to droga oznaczona zakazem ruchu B-1 z tabliczką ,,Nie dotyczy rowerów''.
VA00 (2017-10-10 11:03:16+00:00): Dziwacznie to wygląda, bo faktycznie stoją znaki pionowe przejazdu rowerowego.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-11 11:25:17+00:00): What you meant by surface=interlock in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/297980288/history ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-22 20:03:12+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3236673 ?
wo0GSWr6MfJgFj (2017-12-14 13:33:28+00:00): Way 298009127 has no tagging. Is it a path?
GerdP (2015-10-17 10:06:22+00:00): please check uncommon tagging:
node 2984506160 has
highway=floodway
Did you mean ford=yes ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford
TheOldMiner (2015-10-17 10:41:58+00:00): The tagging is correct.  A ford is commonly a crossing where a driver is required to negotiate an cutting in the creek bank, than cross a creek bed that is not formed (maybe sand, mud, stone) and a vehicle may or may not be required to enter the water.  A floodway, is a common term used on all roads in Queensland given to a formed road (whether gravel, concrete or bitumen) where the road may become inundated during times of flood otherwise the road remains all weather and crossed without difficultly.  The floodways are usually signed as such by Council or Main Roads.  I would be extremely reluctant to change the attributes given the widespread use of the term "floodway"
TheOldMiner (2015-10-17 10:53:25+00:00): Definitions are found in www.tmr.qld.gov.au/~/media/busind/.../mutcdamend7Part2D.pdf

Look at sections 4.10.3 and 4.10.4 for definition between ford and floodway.

Trust this helps
GerdP (2015-10-17 11:07:08+00:00): Thanks for the reply. The link to
the pdf doesn't work, but
I understand that there is a difference.
Question is: Why is this the only element
in OSM with this tag?
Do you know other places which should
be the same?
GerdP (2015-10-17 11:09:03+00:00): found the pdf with google :-)