piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-16 11:22:09+00:00): note: you added some image tags linking to image from StreetComplete notes (for example in this changeset)

Sadly this images are not permanent and are scheduled to be deleted shortly after note is closed, and were never intended for long-term archiving.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#Are_the_pictures_taken_with_StreetComplete_permanent%3F for details.

You can use http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nOD to find remaining links in image tag, including what you added to OSM objects.

If you want to do something with them some may be still retrievable.

All such links are scheduled for removal (broken ones were already removed)
HansWürstchen (2022-11-18 15:05:46+00:00): Hi, everything, clear, thanks for the hint, I've removed the links.
Nice weekend!
ToniE (2022-10-06 13:39:59+00:00): auch hier: bitte nichts doppelt mappen.

Bitte alle Edits dahingehend nochmals prüfen.
ToniE (2022-10-06 13:38:31+00:00): Servus,

"one feature, one OSM object".

Bitte die FF Siegertsbrunn an der Egmatinger Straße nicht doppelt mappen. Sie war bereit als way auf dem Haus gemapped.

Theoretisch könnte/sollte man das sogar auf dem Gelände machen. Priorität sollte immer das größere Objekt haben: Punkt < Haus < Gelände

Gruß,
Toni
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
ToniE (2022-10-06 13:48:46+00:00): hi,

ich weiß auch nicht, warum das Gelände nun als landuse=commercial (Büros) mappes, denn amenity=fire_station war schon korrekt.

Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfire_station

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfire_station#Wie_mappen?

Bitte wieder rückgängig machen und eventuelle Ergänzungen auf das Gelände mappen.

Es gibt hier nichts was ein "refactor" bedarf.

Gruß
Toni
HirschKauz (2022-10-06 16:49:39+00:00): Hi FWBedburg und Willkommen bei openstreetmap :-) Wie ich sehe nutzt Du OSMHydrant zum Mappen und das sieht auch alles top aus. Nur ein kleines Detail: Hydranten haben keinen name=* (genau wie zB Kleidercontainer, öffentliche Telefone etc) Ich werde die Eingaben aus Name=* in description=* ändern. Wenn ein Hydrant eine offizielle Referenz hat, dann gehört das in ref=*  
Grüße aus Bergheim!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127100826
FWBedburg (2022-10-07 05:14:28+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
Dodko (2022-10-08 22:13:39+00:00): odkiaľ ste zobrali číslo domu 184?
dom 184 je celkom inde

https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/12970600?pos=48.768406,18.491003,18
Frans S (2022-10-14 10:25:01+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads. A road you mapped went through buildings.  And some buildings are connected to a road with nodes.
Please be more accurate on those issues.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127101068
Frans S (2022-10-14 09:20:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and hardly squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building and placed on the footprint (high buildings).

Please pay attention to next points:
See this picture how your mappings looks.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_tROSXfo9R2JQBrYE35baIangTfgd93Y/view?usp=sharing
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
* Quality prevails over quantity



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127101227
Dodko (2022-10-08 22:16:52+00:00): pri adresách si pozrite susedné adresy ako boli urobené, treba vyplniť aj addr:place a môžete aj addr:conscriptionnumber tam sa tiež dáva súpisné číslo.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58254292
Dodko (2022-10-08 22:19:41+00:00): adresa je už v budove, nedáva sa duplicitne aj do bodu nad budovou
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52739555

k úradu sa hodí vyplniť aj mail, telefón a úradné hodiny
adrianojbr (2022-10-06 16:43:24+00:00): Olá, Leonardo Favero!

Por favor, evite apagar elementos para recriá-los com outras informações, sempre é preferível que corrija o que já foi adicionado ao mapa, a fim de, principalmente, manter o histórico, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

Abraço!
bxl-forever (2022-10-07 06:37:23+00:00): Hello,

I must warn you this change was misguided.
MapRoulette can be a nice tool to spot mistakes but there was no mistake in the name here.

The French name is "Place de la Monnaie" and the Dutch name is "Munt".  This was confirmed by official data from the Brussels Region and from surveying: those are the names on street signs here.

Yes, we know it might make more sense to create a match and ensure that "Place" goes with "Plein" but that is not correct.  We know people regularly do mistakes like this, and this why we had anticipated the problem and had set alt_name=Muntplein some time ago, to make it searchable through Nominatim.

(There are dozens of streets elsewhere in Brussels where French and Dutch name do not match, e.g. "Place du Jeu de Balle - Vossenplein".  This is normal in a city with a complex history.)

We had to revert your change.
VLD549 (2022-11-01 15:24:48+00:00): I understand, good to know. Thank you.
skyper (2023-02-08 21:45:54+00:00): Hallo Simon,
danke für die Änderung.
Kannst Du in Zukunft bitte den alten Namen unter `old_name=` in der Datenbank lassen. So ist z.B. im GTFS der SBG der Name noch nicht angepasst.
Danke und liebe Grüße,
skyper
NieWnen (2022-10-09 14:13:42+00:00): Może nie ta zmiana, bo było ich tu trochę, ale błędnie oznaczona zduplikowana ścieżka pieszo-rowerowa połączona z chodnikiem

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37971408

Zachęcam do zapoznania się z wiki Rowery. W tym przypadku będzie to "S5".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery
GPar (2022-10-10 07:02:00+00:00): This traffic light doesnt exist
kmpoppe (2022-10-10 07:11:01+00:00): Hi GPar, thanks for pointing this out.
In the mapillary image from 2020, where this node was changed to a traffic light (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=642385810051599) there's still a traffic light to be seen, in photo from 2021 (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=930665197502104) it looks like the complete street layout has changed.
I am not a local, this change was made by a script that updated the mapillary value only.
If you are in the area, please correct the mapping around here accordingly, thanks!
Kai
GPar (2022-10-10 08:32:13+00:00): Hi Kmpoppe,
yes I'm a local...there's one traffic light only on intersection  with "via Ceretta inferiore" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/999168924#map=19/45.20129/7.62278 . And it's same  showed on mapillary , in fact you can see that just few pictures before  on "Via martiri della Libertà" doesn't exist.  https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=146515580775648&lat=45.20182949838&lng=7.6215177000011&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.5590701977257767&y=0.5830837753536908&zoom=0.6005888125613343
May be a deviation problem in the script? 
The layout has never changed...
Thanks
eggie (2022-10-06 14:23:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback Meestal zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer. Is dat hier ook het geval. Dan toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no
en 
hetzelfde evt voor moped en mofa.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-06 15:24:35+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast...
Gr eggie
PiMP3 (2022-10-07 13:18:36+00:00): Hallo Eggie, klopt het eenrichtingsverkeer is uitgezonderd voor (brom)fietsers.
Dodko (2022-10-08 22:11:08+00:00): stavebniny sa značia značkami
shop=trade
trade=building_supplies
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dtrade

telefónne číslo v medzinárodnom tvare +421

číslo domu 209 je už n abudove https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58254439 vtedy s anedáva duplicitne aj do predajne a navyše je s chybou

Hodiny v sobotu majú byť 07:30
Marc_ch (2022-10-06 14:27:59+00:00): Hello,
how does a pedestrian cross the road without a crossing ?
how does a pedestrian cross the road without a crosswalk? the path crosses the road so it's a (unmarked) highway=crossing 
I have reverted the change

PS: overpass isn't a source, it's just a tools. the source you seem to have used is aerial imagery

Regards,
Marc
bxl-forever (2022-10-07 08:42:24+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this.

Writing proper changeset comments is always appreciated, out of courtesy for your fellow mappers.

When you label your changes "Updates" or "Kleine toevoegingen", we need to do detective work and look at objects one by one to check what has changed exactly.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Have a nice day.
eggie (2022-10-06 14:38:52+00:00): De uitzonderingen voor tweewielers heb ik toegevoegd zodat het ook routeert voor (brom)fietsen.

MVG
eggie
PiMP3 (2022-10-07 13:22:24+00:00): Hallo Eggie, klopt, het eenrichtingsverkeer in deze 2 straten is uitgezonderd voor (brom)fietsers.
Neuwessi11 (2022-10-15 12:28:09+00:00): Der Platz des Taxistands ist noch der alte, müsste also noch verlegt werden, richtig?
OEPNV_Achim (2022-10-18 15:12:21+00:00): Richtig, die NEW konnte aber noch nicht genau beschreiben, wohin er verlegt wird. Wenn Du Ortskenntnis hast und den neuen Ort weißt, gerne selbst verlegen, ich höre aber parallel nochmal bei NEW nach.
OEPNV_Achim (2022-10-19 07:15:00+00:00): Taxi-Vorfahrt (2 Fahrzeuge) und neue provisorische Taxi-Aufstellfläche sind jetzt platziert.
Neuwessi11 (2022-10-19 09:22:15+00:00): Ich wollte Dir gerade einen Link schicken, aber da warst Du schneller. :)
Dodko (2022-10-08 22:22:29+00:00): addr:housenumber=583 je nesprávne, tá budova už má číslo 144.
maro21 (2022-10-23 12:22:02+00:00): Proszę nie kopiować danych z innych map. Ulicy Magazynierskiej już nie ma od dawna.
Fiszi37 (2022-10-10 20:30:02+00:00): Cześć! 
Jeśli mapujesz w Polsce opisy twoich zmian mogą być po polsku.
highflyer74 (2022-10-08 07:30:17+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Du hattest um einen Review deiner Bearbeitung gebeten und ich bin gerade drüber gestolpert, da hier eine Multipolygon Relation (der Parkplatz) entstanden ist, welche gar nicht notwendig ist. Vermutlich weißt du gar nicht, was das ist und ich habe es entsprechend in eine normale Fläche geändert.

Entstanden ist das vermutlich, weil der von dir verwendete Editor "iD" die Tendenz dazu hat, in bestimmten Situationen MPs zu erstellen. Genau kann ich es nicht sagen, da ich einen anderen Editor benutze.

Tipp: überlege dir genau, welche Dinge du miteinander verbindest. Generell sollten Wege nicht mit Flächen verbunden werden. Direkt aneinander grenzende Landuse Flächen können verbunden werden. Bedenke, dass viele übereinander liegende Linien es dem nächsten Mapper erschweren, Dinge anzupassen.

Ein bisschen Lesestoff hänge ich dir hier noch an:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://community.openstreetmap.org/

Wenn du Fragen hast, melde dich gern!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Viajero Perdido (2022-10-06 15:32:21+00:00): Oops.  Part of previous changeset (the "simplify" stuff) got mixed in with this one, probably because the server conked out partway during the previous upload.  It all seems fine though.
monotar (2025-05-14 20:37:10+00:00): bisschen spät mein Kommentar aber stimmt einfach nicht. Radweg ist von oben kommend als Ende markiert
adreamy (2024-01-21 15:31:08+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:첫_걸음#한국의_보안_지역(군사_지역)의_매핑과_훼손행위
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:33:38+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127133866
MxxCon (2022-10-07 01:56:44+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you change this tower into full building rather than building part?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127107282
rhtb0 (2022-10-07 07:24:31+00:00): 평택 미군기지, 오산 공군기지, 서울공항, 국정원, 용산 미군기지, 군산공항 등 지울 것들이 많습니다
rhtb0 (2022-10-07 07:25:53+00:00): 해병대 사령부, 진해기지, 계롱대, 육군특수전사령부, 해군 제2함대본부도 있습니다
adreamy (2023-09-07 09:01:55+00:00): 군사시설을 지우고 계신 건지요?
임의로 군사시설을 지우는 것은 훼손행위(Vandalism)에 해당합니다.
복구해 주시기 바랍니다.
rhtb0 (2024-01-21 15:12:15+00:00): https://tiles.osm.kr/#18/37.57500/126.97700
오픈스트리트맵 한국에서는 군부대가 노출되지 않는 지도를 공개하고 있습니다.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 05:31:39+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
mego_map (2022-10-09 12:57:51+00:00): Dear Metwaly Ali;
Please be aware you deleted "264" geocode points and Removing existing data is not good practice, especially if they are good data.
I reverted the geocoded you deleted.
Link OSMCha:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/127107403/
Regards
mego_map
Polarbear (2022-10-06 19:13:25+00:00): Es war sicherlich richtig, die Place-node zu korrigieren. 

Allerdings frage ich mich, was die Quelle "streetlevel imagery;survey" hier bedeutet, insbesondere da dies in vorangegangenen Changesets so verwendet wurde. 

In diesem Fall ist ja die Quelle der vorherige Zustand des Knotens.
eggie (2022-10-06 20:57:10+00:00): Dag Joris.. De brug zelf heb ik nog toegevoegd. Wanneer het de naam van het fietspad is dan heb je het correct gedaan. Heeft het vervolg dezelfde naam?

MVG
eggie
gscscnd (2022-10-06 17:55:36+00:00): Dzięki!
irik (2022-10-06 18:16:35+00:00): Nie ma za co. ;)
skquinn (2022-10-13 11:06:31+00:00): Hi,

Please don't forget to add the direction when the stop sign is on a two-way road, as otherwise navigation software will erroneously call out a stop sign for the other direction (at least OsmAnd will).
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-28 21:08:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101512854 - can you try mapping more accurate areas or at least mark them with fixme tags?
Pilou@nowhere (2022-10-31 10:24:01+00:00): hi Mateusz. Thank for the tip, i will ad this tag next time i have to map spead residential areas. Map it more accurately is difficult : where is the limit of the reidential use and the agricultural use ? the "perfect" solution will be to map only the building. therfore this solution have for consequence that the populated area are visible only at the last zoom level, wath is quite useless for the map users. And this solution il also exessively time consuming. For large  areas of africa, where the map is quite ''virgin'', the maper's time is a limited resource...
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-01 07:21:36+00:00): if the same shape gets copied to multiple areas despite their different shapes then it should be definitely get 

fixme=actually map geometry
or
fixme=fix geometry
or something similar

Exact border depends heavily on context and quality of nearby mapping (this kind of landuse mapping would be definitely not welcome in Poland/Germany - here it may make sense and be useful first step)

> the "perfect" solution will be to map only the building. 

not really, it would be to map landuse shape - for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/757794145#map=19/50.34713/21.28291 is quite good
eggie (2022-10-06 20:04:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-06 20:09:34+00:00): Feedback  Het noodelijk deel rendert niet omdat dit als building:part=yes us getagd.
Is dat wel de bedoeling. De adresnodes liggen nu ok los van het gebouw.
Wellicht nog even kijken?
MVG
eggie
maraf24 (2023-04-16 11:13:45+00:00): 1.Dziura w rowerowym EV9
2.Zniknięcie informacji o jakości i szerokości ddr
3. Zniknięcie informacji o surface dla footway i cycleway

Taki szczątek tylko został: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094513029
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-05 08:35:42+00:00): hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5079559 ?
maro21 (2022-10-08 19:15:12+00:00): Rowery mogą tunelem jechać?
Lukasik (2022-10-09 15:48:09+00:00): Nie jest to ścieżka rowerowa, ale rowery są dozwolone.
maro21 (2022-10-19 20:03:49+00:00): To w takim razie powinno być bicycle=yes :) A dałeś bicycle=permit, co oznacza, że żeby wjechać, trzeba dostać przepustkę
Denis_Helfer (2022-12-12 17:48:46+00:00): Bonjour, 

Bravo pour la mise à jour !
la clé old_ref:FR:SNCF_Reseau a un côté anecdotique (cela cré une nouvelle clé pour rien, les voies concernées ne faisant plus partie de la voie principale). Un jour, elles seront arrachées.  On peut tranquillou supprimer vu que le report de la clé sur le nouveau tracé a été correctement fait. Merci.
Reste plus qu'à observer combien d'années l'opendata SNCF prendra pour se mettre à jour.
eggie (2022-10-06 20:09:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ivanbranco (2022-10-07 15:56:13+00:00): Ciao Elia110894,

image=C:\Users\eliab\Desktop\Immagini open street\Immagine 2022-10-06 182155.png è una directory del tuo pc e non un link quindi è inutilizzabile. Andrebbe cancellato.

Benvenuto su OSM e buon mapping :)
NieWnen (2022-10-07 09:17:17+00:00): Dodałem alt_name="Rondo Liczby Pi". 

W takich przypadkach warto takie coś dodawać, kiedy znak jest użyty nieoczywisty znak, którego nie da się łatwo wyszukiwać.
Inna sprawa, to nie wiadomo w tym przypadku, czy na tabliczce również będzie taki znak, czy jednak słowo "Pi", ale to się ewentualnie potem przeniesie do official_name.
limes11 (2022-10-07 11:42:30+00:00): Hi, 

was ist denn da vor Ort? Kein Hinweis auf den Verein? Wenn dort Räumlichkeiten des Vereins sind, kann man das schon erfassen. Vielleicht nicht unbedingt so, wie es getan wurde.

VG, Limes
Klampfradler (2022-10-07 14:08:46+00:00): Vor Ort ist ein Dymo-Label am Briefkasten eines anderen Vereins, der dort seine Räume hat. In diesen Briefkasten kann die Deutsche Post Briefe einlegen, weil das nach deutschem Recht erforderlich ist.

Es gibt ansonsten kein Schild oder anderen Hinweis, wir haben dort keine eigenen Räume, und man kann uns dort nicht regelmäßig antreffen.

Der Mapper, der den Punkt eingetragen hat, hat einfach ziemlich wirr Informationen von unserer Website zusammenkopiert, ohne je vor Ort gewesen zu sein. Er wollte uns damit zeigen, wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert (weshalb auch immer er das für nötig hielt).
limes11 (2022-10-07 15:24:23+00:00): Alles klar, danke für die Antwort!
zstadler (2023-08-13 14:40:13+00:00): שלום אלכס,

בעריכה זו הוספת שביל ירוק במקביל וממערב לשביל ירוק שהיה כבר מסומן.

ראה במפת הטיולים הפתוחה
https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/map/18.00/29.8754/35.0242

על פי מה שראית בשטח, מה לדעתך צריך לעשות עם קטע השביל הירוק הישן?

בברכה,
זאב
GorALexeY (2023-08-24 06:34:54+00:00): הקלטתי את המסלול לפי הליכה דרך הסימונין. את השביל שלא סימנתי אפשר להוריד
zstadler (2023-08-24 06:44:22+00:00): תודה!

עשיתי קצת סדר עם צבעי המסלולים והיחסים של OSM
muralito (2022-10-07 18:03:08+00:00): Hola. Tene cuidado porque quedo rota la relacion de limites https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2604159
muralito (2022-10-07 18:03:54+00:00): No se si ese nuevo fraccionamiento pasa a ser parte de la Barra del Chuy o se considera como otra poblacion...
NieWnen (2022-10-06 20:01:21+00:00): Nie zdjąłeś proposed:name oraz source:proposed:name.

Nazwa jeszcze nie obowiązuje, choć o to się za specjalnie nie czepiam dopóki jest to nazwa nowa, a nie modyfikacja istniejącej/usunięcie.

Poprawiłem.
tkk (2022-10-07 06:07:48+00:00): Hello, why are you removing tag about no ref present? It is used to distinguish between unknown ref status and known no ref. Please keep it if possible. Thank you.
Luzandro (2022-10-07 11:03:27+00:00): ref=none seems to be common especially in Czech Republic, but it's not documented that "none" should be treated differently and not as a regular value. Similar to noname=yes there exists a key noref: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:noref
tkk (2022-10-07 11:12:40+00:00): But it was not replaced with any such tag, just removed without a reason nor replacement. You may not use it, but as others do, removing it makes the data worse not better.
Luzandro (2022-10-07 11:27:19+00:00): I didn't remove it, just noticed the message and that ref=none isn't the preferred way to do this
gerhard81 (2022-10-09 04:42:51+00:00): As Luzandro posted, ref=none is not correct. I personally don't see an extra value in this tag and removing this won't make the data worse. I use the ref tag only when f. e. there are designated cycleways, walkways or streets which clearly have a reference.
tkk (2022-10-09 14:31:48+00:00): OK, sorry for my misunderstanding. If content of OSM data in Germany is driven solely by your personal view and needs, then it is of course correct to delete whatever you want without taking other's needs into account.
gerhard81 (2022-10-09 15:23:08+00:00): You are using tags which are not correct - so where ist the difference between your interpretation and mine?
tkk (2022-10-09 15:28:51+00:00): No, we in CZ are using tag, that is not documented, it is your interpretation, that is is not correct. The main point is, that you are not using it so it does not hurt you to have it there and still you remove it so you make the data worse for us.
Luzandro (2022-10-09 16:24:13+00:00): The tag is documented and every app that uses ref has to assume that "none" is the actual value. I guess you also won't put name="none" on every unnamed road and argue that this is correct.
user_5359 (2022-10-07 12:39:02+00:00): Welcoem to OSM (again)! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1101533660. What is the meaning of the tag prop = SIM? Did you mean proposed = sim ? 

Please use standard keys, notice the difference of lowercase and uppercase writing of key and values.

Please notice there is also a bigger number of the key pro. What is the difference.

Did you discuss this import? What is the source of your data?
abakus_uploader (2022-10-06 22:31:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!