piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Clira14 (2015-01-22 13:01:44+00:00): ahaa... uz chapem. vdaka. inak vobec to nie je ta budovova, ktoru som myslela. uz je to dobre, zmenila som to cele... lebo tu ta budova s plavarnou uplne chyba. Mozno este updatnem ten obrys, ktory neviem ci je uplne spravny, ale v zasade je to uz lepsie. Navyse tam uz nie je ten tenisovy kurt ktory je tu nalavo od tejto budovy.
andrewsh (2015-01-22 13:07:13+00:00): Hej, už vidím, asi bazén je tuná, [kde budova chýba](http://i.imgur.com/VUozVoQ.png), ale ten kurt je asi vpravo vedľa.
andrewsh (2015-01-22 13:07:28+00:00): Aha, Markdown tu nefunguje.
aceman444 (2015-01-22 20:41:15+00:00): Ono islo o to, ze ste building=yes vymazali a namiesto toho dali len leisure=swimming_pool. Takze uz to nie je budova (nech je vnutri cokolvek) ale otvoreny bazen pod holym nebom (ako napr. na kupalisku Tehelne pole). Aj keby ste building nechali, je to hybrid, lebo budova nemoze byt zaroven bazenom. Ide o to, ze ak ste chceli vyjadrit "plavaren" tak taka znacka zatial nie je (lebo swimming_pool je momentalne definovane ako samotny bazen, t.j. voda, nie cela plavaren). V plavarni (t.j. budove urcenej na kupanie) mozu byt okrem viacerych bazenov este aj ine zariadenia - wc, bufety, kaviarne, vselico). Kazde z nich sa potom moze zaznacit samostatnym bodom niekde v budove. Ano, "zbytocne duplikovanie" je mozne obist, ked ten isty objekt ma rozne vlastnosti a je cely pouzivany na vsetky tieto vlastnosti. Tak napr. building=yes moze byt zaroven aj nejakym obchodom (shop), alebo bankou (amenity=bank) alebo niecim takym. Ak cela je na ten ucel. Ale maly obchodik v jednom z vchodov panelaka by ste zaznacili samostatnym bodom.
aceman444 (2015-01-22 20:56:21+00:00): A k tej nepresnosti fotiek: satelitne fotky byvaju aj niekolko rokov stare, takze budovy mozu byt davno zmenene. A aj na najnovsej mape potom plati to co pisal andrew: budova moze byt tazko obkreslitelna kvoli tienom, stromom a streche zakryvajucej skutocny podorys.
andrewsh (2015-01-21 12:28:56+00:00): Len toto, ak dávaš to na way, tak nezabudni tak dať aj building=yes
Clira14 (2015-01-21 12:29:50+00:00): ahaa... ok, idem to upravit.
aceman444 (2015-01-21 19:32:35+00:00): Dobry den, prosim davajte na sady zmien nejaky komentar. Na niektorych sa Vam to podarilo pekne. Ale niekde chyba.
Clira14 (2015-01-22 11:18:50+00:00): Ano, chvilku trva, kym sa tu otukam. Posnazim sa pre buduce pripady :)
cadsauxk (2015-02-10 21:09:13+00:00): Não é necessário incluir o nome da cidade junto ao nome da vila Sertãozinho(Patos de Minas).

Coloque apenas Sertãozinho, removendo (Patos de Minas).
neiljp (2015-01-22 00:42:29+00:00): What have you changed here? 'The footway' is not particularly descriptive. What can you see on the satellite view that informs this?
Rub21 (2015-01-27 12:40:38+00:00): Hi neiljp, thanks for your feedback:
Yes, I've aligned the footway, because it was not unaligned and it was crossing the tertiary highway. https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/1152236/5918497/4f7f4388-a5f7-11e4-8979-e41ab6c99b85.png
Luchinobr (2015-01-22 08:43:51+00:00): around Pesaro
_al (2015-01-22 06:20:25+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Danke für Deine Beiträge!

Bitte nicht auf einem Forstweg auf der ganzen Länge ein "bridge" setzen, sondern Way teilen und Tags anpassen.

Weiterhin viel Spaß bei OSM!

Servus, Andreas
Super-Map (2021-07-27 18:51:55+00:00): Hi Verdy_p, I try to improve this map (like usually) and to clean up... as you're the owner of this relation: "n°4505476" this one is broken and not really useful any more... (look like an open relation) and this one seem malformed: "n°4505478" but "close" and you're the owner too... so it will be useful to delete all "useless" relation or broken... there is enough mistakes on the map as you know... By advance thanks for your understanding. As we want all this map to be "improved" and fully functional in the "future"... but this "future" isn't so close as the work is so "huge"... But if everyone try to work on it in this "goal" we will be able to go "forward"... By advance thanks for your understanding.
Verdy_p (2021-07-27 23:27:07+00:00): Tu te trompes. 
Ce sont les limites en vigueur depuis 2015 (nouveaux cantons élargis).
Ces relations étaient bonnes mais cassées depuis par d'autres.
Elles doivent donc être réparées à nouveau, et non détruites !
Verdy_p (2021-07-27 23:28:21+00:00): C'est l'utilisateur "Fred_OSM" qui les a cassées.
Verdy_p (2021-07-27 23:28:52+00:00): Il y a eu aussi l'utilisateur "max93600"
Verdy_p (2021-07-27 23:58:20+00:00): Je vais réparer ça. Note: si tu ne comprends pas le français, pas la peine surtout de toucher à ça.
If you don't understand French (as above), please do not touche these relations because you made false assumptions.
Verdy_p (2021-07-28 00:03:09+00:00): Note: I'm not the "owner" of these relations. I was one of the creators and editors. All these relations were valid before they were broken last year.
As far as I know, the "new" cantons have not changed since 2015 when they were enlarged with the new "parity" voting system (forcing many pairs of older cantons to be merged and slightly modified).
The legal reference links were also included in all these.
But other users did not care last year and broke them.
I'll need to reconstruct them from the history: about 50 ways have been incorrectly dropped in the boundary relation beween Merignac-1 and Merignac-2.
Super-Map (2021-07-28 06:50:36+00:00): Hi Verdy_p, Proud to be French isn't it? I saw the flag on your picture profile... '-)  I understand, but as you can to believe, I haven't yet the time to check all and I do not "politic" so I'm not able to fix anything like this... this is why I have contacted you. Ne le prenez pas mal, vous n'êtes en rien "visé". J'aime la cartographie tout comme vous, mais j'aime le faire bien! Il y a suffisamment: "d'irresponsable"!... Et pas seulement en cartographie "ouverte"...
Verdy_p (2021-07-28 15:17:36+00:00): For that mattr, you confirm that you are not French, and don't know exactly how boundaries are organized. All these were properly sourced with legal references in tags. Tis should be sufficient for you to make further checks and you would have seen that the fact these relations were broken were because of other people not checking their other changes when they broke something that was valid. I have repaired a few hours ago the damages there.
Please, if you don't understand French or French law, don't touch, or "fix" or delete boundaries, jsut contact other people to fix what you detect. Look at the history (it's not always easy with iD, but history is simple to look at using JOSM and such fixes on boundaries are easier and faster to perform in JOSM).
Verdy_p (2021-07-28 15:28:46+00:00): Also you should know that French cantons exist in two forms, the older form used until 2015 and referenced in many legal texts (notably in Code Rural for administrative purpose or environmental and local legislations) and new cantons for electoral purpose only (for departmental elections where they are only electoral boundaries, not administrative).
The "end_date" in March 2015 concerns in fact only the electoral purpose, and new legal texts referencing them since 2015. But there are tons of other legal texts remaining that apply using the boundaries that were effective when the legislation was enacted (and which is still referenced also in commercial/private contracts, or on contracts for publci markets that are still effective and whose effect must remain traceable for at least 10 years where they are still opposable in courts).
So several definitions have to coexist and date matters. For now there's no reason to delete canton boundaries that were effective for all pupose until March 2015.
The major reason why cantons were completely redefined in 2015 was the application of electoral law for parity in depearmental elections: the total number of seats was not changed, but law warrantied that an equal number of men and women would be elected; so tow council members were elected by canton instead of just one, and so the total number of cantons was roughly divided by 2; some were merged, some not because of legal quorums of residents, a few were slightly modified. This draw a new electoral map, but also a new separate definition of cantons specifically for departmental elections.
Other usages have persisted and were not canceled. Older boundaries continue to be effective in various legal documents still enforceable even if *new* documents can no longer reference them.
Verdy_p (2021-07-28 15:37:07+00:00): Another reason why old cantons up to March 2015 are kept is for statistical continuity purpose. For example, the official French INSEE institute maintains continuity of statistics for at least 10 years (this is also in conformance with international right and European legislation: actions must be traceable and comparable over a significant period of time, as it is important for correct analysis of new changes or legal reforms, some of them may be experimental and could be cancelled/reverted later). And it is also important culturally (for example the older 26 metropolitan regions are kept in OSM, also with an "end_date" tag, even if the 13 new ones are effective. The "end_tag" is used to make the distinction and allow efficient filtering when searching in OSM. Various maps and statistics depend on such "historic" data that are not just focused on the present state.
Super-Map (2021-07-29 10:25:59+00:00): "...But other users did not care last year and broke them"... unfortunately it's often the case in OSM like in "real life"... like others "open projects"... As you know, we know who we are, but the "other"... And of course I know ID, I know ID history and certainly one, with some persons to know how to use very well JOSM and much more the "history". You aren't' yet "targeted, just see something wrong and like me you "work" on OSM since "years"... And like in the real life, I don't want to do "politics" because, just my citizen right when I have this luck"! If we can call that a "luck"... but you know in a "close country" without a democratic process it's always worse! Don't worry I know who I am... But I have lot of reasons to be named: "SuperMap"! In this project and this one isn't yet only one project! As you know we do all mistakes sometime... in this project al in the real life. But like in the real life some "persons" do not mistakes, but do something intentionally! And in this case, they must be FULLY RESPONSIBLE of them acts! This is a wonderful project with very nice purpose so often misunderstanding for the most of us and maybe it's better like this (you know the world where we living all...).  English is the "international" language", so OPEN for everyone... If you have repair all relations, I have seen at less two listed "above", so: "THANKS you"! Thanks for your "explanation, but you know, I'm not really a "teenager" any more since "years" '-), I understand all even without you help... but I can't do all, you know... in the most of time I'm perfectly able to make all corrections needed for all type of relation even all messages of the software itself... Like usually I'm "autodidact" in this project and lot of other "stuff"... I love this project and I know why, but I able to tell you I hate certain" behaviours" and stupid "speech"... you know, it's like in the real life we have always a "black sheep" somewhere... never satisfy and so often very "jealous" because they are UNABLE TO DO that you're able! Perfectly the same in the real life! As you know, It's an open project, everyone is FREE to learn and improve this WONDERFUL project! And I want to see this project to go FORWARD, not the contrary! I know lot French laws, because... And I'm very "tolerant" persons with lot of "patience"... however to be "tolerant" have never been to be "blind & stupid"!... One more time thanks so much for to have spent several minutes of your time. As you know in OSM (like elsewhere) we must follow the "rules", in this case: "the WIKI", because if we want this project fully "functional" it must be interpreted by lot of "software". It's why I do lot of endeavour on this project and make it: "a reality"!
eggie (2021-01-05 13:59:06+00:00): Nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
XaMi (2015-02-02 23:48:17+00:00): Hausnummer 9 und 11 überlagern sich. Liegen die wirklich in Etagen übereinander? Hausnummer 11 ist in NRW ALK am nächsten Gebäude eingezeichnet (kann aber durchaus dort falsch sein)
muralito (2015-01-22 01:03:01+00:00): Cambio revertido. El punto no era vacio. Indicaba un desfibrilador.
muralito (2015-01-22 01:06:00+00:00): Las restricciones agregadas indican que no se permite el paso de bicicletas (ej. bicycle=no ), cosa que no refleja la realidad.
globosound (2015-02-27 07:51:54+00:00): Gebäudekategorie geändert
SomeoneElse (2015-01-25 23:47:19+00:00): Hi - it seems that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323464911 is a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323463553 here?
globosound (2015-02-27 07:51:34+00:00): Gebäudekategorie in Schule geändert, Kontaktdaten editiert
globosound (2015-02-27 07:51:07+00:00): Gebäudekategorie geändert, Kontaktdaten editiert
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-04 10:52:23+00:00): باسلام و خسته نباشید
جناب عزیزقناد برای انتهای کوچه های بن بست، ایجاد دایره گردش صحیح نیست. می توانید به تعریف دایره گردش هم رجوع کنید؛ منطقه گسترده ای از جاده که اجازه می دهد تا وسایل نقلیه راحت‌تر دور بزنند.
ChehrehBargi (2019-10-04 10:53:04+00:00): وجود نقطه برای این نوع موارد کافیست
موفق باشید
neuhausr (2015-05-21 14:03:13+00:00): Did you mean to add highway=track to all those streams in the southern part of your edits??
samely (2015-05-21 15:29:53+00:00): Thanks for your feedback. I already fixed my mistake.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-22 20:26:14+00:00): I think that something has gone a bit wrong here.  Looking at the imagery, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71291677 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88818405 look like an attempt to draw the same feature, once as a service road and once as a footpath.  I suspect the reality is that the feature has the physical characteristics of a service road with the access rights of a footpath  (but it'll need a ground survey to find out).  If you're not in a position to do that, perhaps add an OSM note so that someone (perhaps on the way to or from the ferry port) could have a look?
SomeoneElse (2015-02-03 20:19:49+00:00): Any thoughts on this - are you in a position to survey, or not?
abel801 (2015-02-19 01:50:51+00:00): Yes, I sent a message to my team and I am going to fix this in a couple of days. thanks.
abel801 (2015-02-19 19:34:15+00:00): I've fixed this road, it look as service road with access drivecar,and I deleted the footway road, it was editing 5 years ago. we can think now that became on service road as show the  satellite images.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-19 20:00:26+00:00): What about the link to the footpath to the north?  Presumably a note still needs leaving open for that?
abel801 (2015-02-22 19:26:57+00:00): As far as I see, I think that it is right but if you think that something is missing, please help me to figure out.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-22 19:48:31+00:00): It'll need someone to survey it on the ground.  You can't tell for sure from aerial imagery whether there's anything physically or legally stopping you from getting from the footpath to the north through the caravan site to the main road.

I added http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/314966 a while back.  There aren't many mappers in this part of Wales, but there are some - and there'll be many more when the tourist season picks up in the Summer.

I can understand Mapbox's desire to "fix the map" but am surprised that so much effort is spent in places where there _are_ on the ground mappers (like the UK) and not where there _aren't_, like large parts of the USA.

Perhaps come back here when the last unreviewed TIGER "residential road" in the US has been fixed?
Nakaner (2015-01-21 16:31:31+00:00): You should map the station as a node if you want to keep Aberdeen compatible to OpenRailwayMap tagging scheme. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Stations_.2F_Stops

You can connect the station node with the station building(s) and the station area (from entry signal to entry signal) by using a operating site relation. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Operating_Site_.28Relation.29
robbieonsea (2015-01-22 20:21:25+00:00): Note that cuisine tag values should match exactly something from: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine
Thus
 Italian => italian
+
Turkish_&_Meze => turkish
SomeoneElse (2015-01-21 16:53:14+00:00): Would it be possible to explain what "fixing highway intercts highway to fix, tiger http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/?error=highwayhighway" means?  This is a very wide changeset that overlaps with where I am in the UK.  How do I find out what changes have been made locally, why, and what the source was?
abel801 (2015-02-19 02:16:35+00:00): The source was bing and thank you for the comment.
Nakaner (2015-01-21 16:12:58+00:00): Da hat mir die Autovervollständigung einen Streich gespielt. Bitte im Changeset-Kommentar den Satz "In der Bahnhofskategorienliste steht "Steinheim/Main", vor Ort "Steinheim/Main (Hanau)"" ignorieren.
cadsauxk (2015-02-04 23:58:26+00:00): Não utilize abreviações tipo "Av.", escreva por extenso "Avenida".

Qual a origem dos dados? De onde tirou o nome das ruas?
boy_magia (2015-02-05 15:54:40+00:00): Já morei no local, farei alteração nas abreviações.
cadsauxk (2015-02-05 16:32:27+00:00): Se são dados coletados por você mesmo, neste caso registre como source=survey.
emacsen (2015-01-21 19:06:23+00:00): What is this changeset? All I see are lots of nodes being deleted. Why were they deleted?
GerdP (2015-10-19 06:36:25+00:00): please review uncommon tag
highway=boundary
on way 323478442
Minh Nguyen (2015-09-26 01:39:40+00:00): Looks an odd editor bug, but several of these bus stop names have numbers randomly inserted in. I removed them in changeset 34255087. I’ve never ridden TANK before, so let me know if this is some strange convention they have. :-)
Nate Wessel (2015-09-26 03:49:30+00:00): Oh, how strange. I'm surprised I didn't catch that... suppose I never went back for a second look. Good catch!
skquinn (2018-03-10 07:31:01+00:00): Please do not put ad copy into the OSM database.
freebeer (2018-03-10 13:03:16+00:00): Also I don't think hotel is the right classification of something going by the name `Bed & Breakfast'
_al (2015-01-22 06:26:47+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Danke für Deine Beiträge!

Bitte die Brücken nicht einfach über den Weg "drübermalen", sondern den Way teilen und die Tags entsprechend anpassen.

Weiterhin viel Spaß mit OSM!

Servus, Andreas
_al (2015-01-22 06:28:31+00:00): Nochwas: stimmt das wirklich, dass dort so viele Brücken sind? Ist das vor Ort überprüft? Oder stimmt nur einfach der Bach-/Wegverlauf nicht genau?
Zartbitter (2016-03-31 13:23:47+00:00): Nur zur Info: Du hast in Flensburg eine korrekte PLZ auf einen falschen Wert geändert. Mir ist das jetzt erst aufgefallen, ich habe es wieder korrigiert.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-22 00:23:10+00:00): What's the source (and licence terms) of the "Sabre Roader's Digest"?

From memory (it's about a month since I drove down here) the signage round the back of Meadow Lane is a bit odd.  I believe that traffic east for the A52 _is_ sent this way, and it is signed as something, but I can't remember what.  Maybe one of the previous mappers (if asked) might know?
robert (2015-01-21 19:42:41+00:00): You haven't given way 323491043 that you created (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/323491043) any tags. This means that OSM has no way of knowing what it "is". It's a meaningless abstract line.

In iD, after you've created a line, you've got to assign tags to it using the menu that then appears on the left.

What were you trying to create it as?
krzyk (2015-06-16 05:35:11+00:00): Hmm, przydało by się, żeby skrypt nie usuwał istniejących adresów przypisanych do budunków, teraz niestety musze na nowo nanieść swoje zmiany.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-22 17:42:07+00:00): @krzyk:
A jakiś przykład można prosić?
Może było coś z nimi (tymi adresami) nie tak? Widzę, że edytujesz w iD - ten edytor nie jest doskonały.
mueschel (2019-12-22 15:20:14+00:00): Hi,
could you check this stream? It looks like you wanted to add a name, but the tag is wrong: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206252994
zimba (2019-12-24 18:40:55+00:00): Corrected, thanks for making me aware!
Nakaner (2016-03-19 11:17:54+00:00): Hallo Linie29,

ich habe mir diesen Änderungssatz exemplarisch herausgepickt, der Kommentar gilt aber für viele andere Änderungssätze von dir aus dem Januar 2015 (und u.U. auch weiteren Monaten).

Du hast im Januar 2015 bei ca. 8000 Weichen in Österreich die Weichennummer ergänzt. Das macht mich stutzig. Woher hast du die Daten? Hast du Streckenkunde in ganz Österreich und jeden Bahnhof persönlich besucht, alle Weichennummern notiert usw.?

Im Voraus vielen Dank für deine Antwort.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Linie29 (2016-03-19 23:23:02+00:00): Hallo,
Ich komme sehr viel herum und habe auch zeitlich die Möglichkeit zum intensiven Mappen wobei ich zugeben muss, dass ich da ein bis zwei Helfer habe die mich dabei unterstützen besonders in Gegenden in die ich nicht so oft komme. Den Großteil habe ich quasi als Primärdaten erfasst, sei es vor Ort, als Fahrgast im Wagen oder auch vorne in der ersten Reihe (hilft besonders beim Signalmapping und geht auch einfacher als wenn man im Wagen auf nur einer Seite sitzt).
mfG
L29
Nakaner (2016-03-20 19:39:08+00:00): Hallo Linie29,

vielen Dank für deine Antwort. Dann bin ich beruhigt und wünsche dir und deinen Assistenten noch viel Spaß beim Mappen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
naoliv (2015-02-04 18:31:30+00:00): Vitor, esses nós de cidade não devem ter admin_level como você está adicionando.
Essa informação já está contida nas relações de limite administrativo.
Vítor Dias (2015-02-04 20:29:47+00:00): Ei naoliv! Nesses changesets, eu trabalhei pelo JOSM apenas nas vias que constituem os limites, os nós das cidades ficaram ocultos... tem certeza que eles foram modificados no meu changeset? De todo modo, vou ficar atento para as próximas edições. Abraços!
naoliv (2015-02-04 20:34:17+00:00): Oi Vitor!
Foram no seu sim: http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=416642410

Talvez você selecionou as relações e sem querer acabou selecionando os nós juntos?
Vítor Dias (2015-02-04 21:37:35+00:00): Pode ter sido isso. Vou ficar atento para as próximas edições.
naoliv (2015-02-04 21:38:53+00:00): OK. Abraço!
SomeoneElse (2015-02-05 18:39:08+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetmap!

I've just spotted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190898036 here - I'm guessing from the imagery that it's a building of some sort?  "building=yes" would do if nothing more definite was known.  Also, does it really have a housename of "Empty"?

Anyway, I hope you don't mind me mentioning this - any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-10-16 20:00:17+00:00): pasów ruchu nie rysujemy jako oddzielne linie, kasuję te cuda.
ENS LECCE (2015-01-21 21:53:39+00:00): ENS LECCE
*Martin* (2015-01-22 16:38:00+00:00): Ahoj Andi

Prosim uvadzaj zdroj udajov a popisy ku tvojim changesetom.

Dakujem.
BáthoryPéter (2015-01-22 08:35:17+00:00): Kedves kolléga, Ön volt a gyorsabb. Ez a tó tegnap még nem hullámzott itt :)
grin (2015-01-22 10:48:35+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28316029
grin (2015-01-22 10:49:02+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3C6Utr027QY
schnism (2015-01-25 12:08:18+00:00): Test
SomeoneElse (2015-01-22 00:03:18+00:00): (continuing changeset comment) - the rest isn't separate so added as cycleway=opposite_track.  Also removed a section of duplicate footpath / track, and added a fixme to the footpath, which looks iffy.
muralito (2015-02-05 02:35:49+00:00): Los nombres viejos no van entre parentesis, van en la etiqueta old_name.