piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2020-03-12 08:37:04+00:00): Naprawdę lokalna ludność używa tych nazw oznakowanych jako place=locality?
Karol_S (2020-03-12 13:46:18+00:00): Nazwy jaskiń na Skałce (WWA) ustalone w roku 2007, torfowisko – nazwa oficjalna, miała zastosowanie w pracach biologów, nazwy w lasach na N od Suchedniowa – uwarunkowania historyczne, m.in. dawne kamieniołomy. Pozostałe nazwy odnotowano ok. roku 2012 głównie w oparciu o wywiad lokalny – chyba nie będziemy powtarzać owego wywiadu wykonanego przez urzędy 8 lat temu? :)

Zresztą kryterium stosowalności nazw powinny być raczej oficjalne źródła trzecia, a nie nazwy tylko zasłyszane lokalnie
maraf24 (2020-03-12 19:11:34+00:00): Nazwy pochodzącę z Komisja Nazw Miejscowości i Obiektów Fizjograficznych - ok.
Nazwy z wywiadu mający status niezestandaryzowanych - tu był szukał dodatkowego potwierdzenia.
A skoro kopiujesz dane z PRNG, to może skopiujesz też dodatkowe informacje? Np. w ref:prng można podać id w PRNG obiektu, a  w description co to takiego jest , np "cześć lasu". Bo place=locality to bardzo ogólny tag.
Karol_S (2020-03-12 19:44:36+00:00): Dziękuję za podpowiedzi dot. tagowania, dopiero się uczę rozmaitych tagów, wielu jeszcze nie znam.

Ponadto próbuję się oswoić z JOSM-em, którego używam dopiero od niedawna, kiedy poważnie odczułem ograniczone możliwości i wady edycji w przeglądarce
maraf24 (2020-03-12 21:00:53+00:00): Dzięki za wyjaśnienia. 
Nie mam nic przeciwko dodawaniu nazw w sposób świadomy, zwłaszcza z zapoznaniem się z całością informacji w PRNG (a nie tylko skopiowaniem nazwy wyswietlonej na podkładzie WMS).
W komentarzu do zestawu dobrze jest obszerniej opisać metodę, sporo tam miejsca, dzięki temu można potem uniknąć pytań od innych mapujących :)
Olla_Ko (2020-03-13 12:15:11+00:00): Hi! Could you please provide any details about your edits? They seem fictional
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82020987
Lyon-St-Clair (2020-03-14 10:11:18+00:00): Arrête de prendre OpenStreetMap pour ton monde, c'est pas un jouet.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-15 12:14:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82215411 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in France.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3564 for more information.
muralito (2020-03-11 12:39:58+00:00): Hola. No se que quisiste hacer, pero a primera vista parece no tiene sentido el resultado.,
WoodWoseWulf (2020-03-10 23:03:23+00:00): Hi lazarevm,

Welcome back to OSM

Are you sure that all of these parks you are adding are actually parks actively used for leisure? They do look like open green spaces but looking at satellite they kind of just look more similar to nature strips/green spaces between parking lots and buildings.
lazarevm (2020-03-16 17:36:58+00:00): I did the change based on observation from last 3-4 years around how this part of greenery is used. I believe that property-wise, this belongs to Canada Post, but someone (CanadaPost, likely) put couple of picnic tables under the trees, and since two bus stops are nearby, seemingly plenty of people use it daily. To my surprise, I've seen people eating lunch (and not just CP or ScotiaBank employees, those are usually on their own patios nearby), people with dogs resting, joggers chatting (I don't even know where are the joggers from, Wynford has better jogging space in huge parkland on east side of DVP).
I could remove it, because you are right, this is not formally a park, I was just trying to reflect what I see daily (not so much in winter, though).
Chris Fleming (2020-03-11 01:02:20+00:00): Hi, thanks Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Thanks  for taking time to sign up for and account and help improve the map. 

I do have a question about this edit, is Abbey Gardens here really a footway, in OSM this implies no vehicular access?

Also let me know if you have any questions?

Cheers
Chris
!bm (2020-03-11 00:07:10+00:00): Hey tordans, das nenne ich mal eine interessante Kombination:
way 779999278
way 364590496
node 2096395291
Bin mir noch nicht sicher, was ich davon halten soll... Die (zu befürchtende) logische Konsequenz wird wohl sein, dass die Straße samt daran klebender Relationen in Richtungsfahrbahnen aufgesplittet wird. Kann man machen, aber ob es die Kartendaten wirklich verbessert, halte ich für fraglich. --besteGrüße!bm
tordans (2020-03-11 10:31:35+00:00): Agreed, das war quatsch. Ist gelöscht https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82052837. Danke!
Mike Baggaley (2020-03-19 23:12:44+00:00): HI in this change you have tagged ways 24941507, 24941513, 24941516 and 498811864 (Hall Walks) as highway=primary. However, they have ref=B1283. Are these now part of the A182? If so, please change the ref. If not, please revert to highway=secondary as per the UK tagging guidelines.

Thanks,
Mike
Vinber (2020-03-11 06:39:35+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour les corrections sur les noms.
J'ai l'impression que la personne renseigne correctement name:fr et name est souvent tronqué ?
C'est une impression ou c'est bien cela ?
Bonne journée
Vincent
trouyer (2020-03-11 19:57:47+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui, c'est bien, ça. On peut voir sur Osmose qu'il en reste encore.

Thomas
Chris Lawrence (2021-04-09 20:17:03+00:00): This changeset was largely in error, as can be seen using current NAIP imagery that shows a five-lane configuration of the Cochran bypass (and could have been verified from GDOT's own plan sheets).
eggie (2020-03-10 21:35:18+00:00): Hi Hisger,

You move addressnode Rustenburgerlaan to the middle of the street.
You deleted a vending_machine for parking tickets.. No vending_machine here? 
Your edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=82023260

Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-10 21:39:07+00:00): restored addresnode
tordans (2020-03-10 20:56:43+00:00): Source: Geoportal Berlin / Berlin Zoom
Source: Geoportal Berlin / Digitale farbige Orthophotos 2019 (DOP20RGB)
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 06:50:34+00:00): Hello! In case that you remember it or can visit this location...

What you meant by shop=online on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7283268350/history ?

Is there pickup point of bought products (nowadays marked as shop=outpost)

Office of shop company (office=company would fit better)

Officially registered business address, with no on-the-ground activity?

Something else?
Jakka (2023-03-20 07:12:01+00:00): No shop no takeaway a individual person like sales representative
But see he/her site is offline.
Need to check if still exist
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-09 18:17:28+00:00): have you had opportunity to check it?
Jakka (2023-05-10 09:08:35+00:00): nope I Deleted this
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-11 20:05:52+00:00): Hi NKA,

may we know the reason behind deleting several mapped service ways? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=82023882

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
NKA (2020-03-11 21:10:16+00:00): Many of them were replaced in one of the other changesets for this import.
Some short segments had considerable offset or did not exist, and were not replaced (they were mapped before we had orthophotos for Norway).
I will look into it though. I still have the file.
py_berrard (2020-04-26 22:45:35+00:00): J'ai supprimé celui-là : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7283375933/history
(au milieu de la rue et rien de correspondant dans le secteur)
eggie (2020-03-10 21:44:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Alle gebouwen ..ook construction.. zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. we tekenen dus niet zelf in.
Je hebt nu gebouwen die al waren geïmporteerd en nog onder constreuction staan verwijderd. Is dat de bedoeling.
Gebouwen die je hebt ingetekend kun je beter via een verzoek op het forum van OSM laten importeren.
Dit kan in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-10 21:50:38+00:00): Wegen die nog niet gereed zijn kun je mappen als highway=construction en de extra tag construction=residential

Zijn deze wegen allemaal al gereed?
eggie (2020-03-10 21:58:47+00:00): Verzoek import gedaan https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=780006#p780006
eggie (2020-03-11 08:30:05+00:00): Dag Gq  Het beste kun je een terugmelding doen bij het Kadaster via deze site https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=roedenberge&resultOffset=0&objectId=1701100000243574&geometry.x=216903.24999573&geometry.y=542108.11899851&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=
Doe je het zelf?  Anders blijven de imports verkeerd gaan. 
Het Kadaster moet gewoon z'n administratie op orde hebben.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-10 21:46:04+00:00): Playground structure doet niets in OSM.  Lees je goed in.. zie welkomstmail.. link naar de wiki. ( leisure=playground) 
MVG,
Eggie
leofranz (2020-03-10 23:07:01+00:00): Hi LanovkarJ,
bei der Hohen Fürleg ist offenbar etwas schiefgelaufen. Du hast 100 Meter vom bereits eingezeichneten Gipfel eine neuen Gipfel mit dem gleichen Namen angelegt, und beim alten den Tag "natural=peak" entfernt. Laut Tiris Laserscan passt aber die Position des alten Gipfels viel besser. Hast du die Änderung unabsichtlich gemacht oder bist du dir sehr sicher, dass der alte Gipfel falsch ist? lg leofranz
If you prefere to communicate in English let me know.
Hungerburg (2020-03-11 09:39:17+00:00): No need to be polite - this is plain vandalism - look at the other changes of this user - even if it was meant honestly, OSM does not need such idiots on board!

I did revert the changes around Vomperloch, there are plenty more stupid changes that I rather not touch.
Hungerburg (2020-03-13 19:43:29+00:00): Vandalism by LanovkarJ reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82049637
Hungerburg (2020-04-02 10:40:54+00:00): LanovkarJ, I would be interested to learn where you got the information for the aerialway Walderalm-Huderbank-Eiskar from.

It is no longer on the map, but you can see some hints still here https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=82024546
Hungerburg (2020-04-03 18:24:52+00:00): No answer, does that mean, no source?
LanovkarJ (2020-04-08 17:52:32+00:00): It was from liftworld, but it was deleted.
Hungerburg (2020-04-08 18:12:27+00:00): I am not into the skiing business, but this was so incredibly a hoax, how could you fall for that?
leofranz (2020-04-09 06:48:57+00:00): @LanovkarJ, do you mean lift-world.info? Have you read https://www.lift-world.info/en/community/terms.htm ?
This is a copyright validation.
leofranz (2020-04-09 06:49:22+00:00): violation
Hungerburg (2020-04-09 18:22:17+00:00): Hi tyrolean lads and bohemian boys; Here my two cents: Giving a web rescource as evidence is not a copyright violation. Mapping a single fact from e.g. a credible report on the web or from a book, that is neither. Taking a collection of facts (or fiction - this does not matter then) from one medium to another, that is a c.v.

To me, the Laovkar edits look most like a sample from the last category. Sometimes publishers plant easter eggs into their collections, that make wholesome copying easy to spot. If the Eiskarlbahn was of that type, I suppose no. But the effect remains the same.
Hungerburg (2020-04-11 21:54:48+00:00): To belabour the subject some more: Wholesale copying of lift-world or other such services is nearly impossible, because OSM data in itself is too complete :)

But dear bohemityrolean Lanovkař (rhymes with "sei kein *rsch"), do your research more diligently, e.g. vet against multiple sources. And please, please do not move or level mountains for a proposed gondola!

PS: Still waiting for the source of the Saharan Skiing resort, and also for the downhill piste from the top of Mount Everest
Hungerburg (2020-03-13 11:00:28+00:00): Vandalism by LanovkarJ reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82159008
muralito (2020-03-11 12:42:45+00:00): Hi. A stream does not have an address. Only buildings and plots.
CapAhab (2020-03-11 15:21:20+00:00): Yes, you are correct. I didn’t add those tags to the streams.  It appears that hector0775 may have done that.
Polarbear (2023-07-03 09:04:29+00:00): Hallo Anrijs, 
woher stammt der Name
"Der olympische große Kessel"?

Ich konnte da ausser Fundstellen, die OSM-Daten benutzen, keine Quelle finden?
Polarbear (2023-07-03 09:32:26+00:00): Habe da jetzt eien Beschreibung draus gemacht.
eggie (2020-03-10 22:16:33+00:00): Beste  Gqipst,
Nuttige bijdragen.. 
Wanneer de wegen nog niet gereed zijn dan svp intekenen als highway=construction
construction=residential 
MVG,
Eggie
Filip009 (2025-01-23 08:13:56+00:00): Prečo by malo ísť meno zrušenej prevádzky do old_name? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5002073978/history/2 Všimol som si to na viacerých POI a príde mi to odveci, pretože keď sa tam otvorí niečo iné, tak to s tým novým nemá žiadny súvis a tak nechápem, prečo by sa to malo dávať do old_name, keďže to vidieť v histórií objektu.
aceman444 (2025-02-06 09:12:29+00:00): Davam to tak vtedy, ked sa nezmeni typ prevadzky, napr. je to stale restauracia. Povodny nazov mozu ludia stale poznat a hladat.

Historiu objektu vidia len editori OSM, bezni pouzivatelia v aplikaciach vymazane znacky uz nevidia, nedopracuju sa k nim. Takze toto nepovazujem za vhodny zdroj pre nich.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-15 16:28:43+00:00): name is not ref, don't use refs in the name tag.  You also added embankment tags where they don't apply, and extended turn lanes past their exits.  This edit makes very little sense.
Baloo Uriza (2020-03-15 16:31:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82221598 where the changeset comment is: See previous note.
Mond00 (2020-03-25 19:32:31+00:00): Bitte die Öffnungszeiten der Apotheke kontrollieren. Am Samstag zur Zeit verschiedene
GeoJess (2020-11-11 19:36:42+00:00): Hi Erick,

Hope you are having a wonderful day and thank you for all of your contributions to OSM! I am leaving a changeset comment to inquire about w438014800. Seems like it doesn't exist on any of the aerial imagery and was wondering if you had any local knowledge about it. Hope to hear from you soon!

Regards,
Jesspher
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-11-11 19:50:19+00:00): Hello, I was not the one who created that, I checked and it really doesn't exist, I deleted it.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-03-10 22:57:13+00:00): Hi kyoung5446,

Thanks for your recent additions.

As a quick note: If you're adding a parking lot, the appropriate tag is "amenity=parking" rather than "leisure=park". The latter tag is used for open, green community spaces designed for leisure rather than somewhere to put your car.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:46:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
tux67 (2020-03-11 06:04:02+00:00): Hallo RamBro,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Du hattest ein Review requested. Was ist denn die Quelle für deine Änderung. Die solltest du immer beim Hochladen angeben. 

Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82025679
tux67 (2020-03-11 06:53:40+00:00): Kleiner Nachtrag. Ist es Absicht, daß ein Teil der Straße highway=path ist? Das wäre für den Autoverkehr nicht zugelassen.
RamBro (2020-03-11 07:38:20+00:00): Hallo tux67,
danke für die Hinweise...
Ich habe den Bereich vor Ort schon gesehen und dann anhand Luftbilder von Maxar erfasst.
Der hintere Teil der "Wege" ist tatsächlich nicht für den Verkehr zugelassen...

Viele Grüße
RamBro
tux67 (2020-03-11 11:12:56+00:00): Prima .. Nordöstlich des Aldi waren auch noch neue Gebäude und die Straße Zum Römerfeld. 
Wenn du dich vielleicht auskennst: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206856197
Gibt's den Pfad jetzt so noch?
TrueWeast (2020-03-10 22:45:51+00:00): The proper imagery citation for this changeset is Maxar Premium Imagery.
Chris Fleming (2020-03-11 01:04:33+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for helping to improve the map.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris
Barrold (2020-03-12 15:45:36+00:00): Thank you! So far I have been improving the map locally around me where there is a fair bit of construction and so on. If I have any issues I will reach out!
EdLoach (2020-03-13 09:54:07+00:00): Hi. I'm guessing this is a private pool from the imagery (I live near, pass regularly, and have never seen it advertised), so the wiki suggests adding access=private https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool - did you want to do this, or shall I? Best wishes, Ed
TrueWeast (2020-03-10 23:04:47+00:00): Proper imagery citation for this changeset is Maxar Premium Imagery.
VA00 (2021-02-23 12:17:31+00:00): Te ścieżynki chyba zostaną ,,zrewitalizowane''. Skasować?
pan_borsuk (2021-02-24 00:49:59+00:00): jak to było z tą nadgorliwością ? :-D

ludzie są uparci <3 i chodzą cały czas tą między tuwima a 29listopada. druga jest klasycznym skrótem odkąd pamiętam za dzieciaka. Skoro jest ogrodzenie i mapa nie wytycza to po co kasować? - tym bardziej że nie ma jeszcze wyznaczonych/naniesionych nowych/zrewitalizowanych. poczekamy zobaczymy po remoncie. park-M robi głównie to co na "górze parku" a na tej łace miał być wygrany projekt z budżetu obywatelskiego lecz na razie go wstrzymali co coś tak kolidował z czasem remontu m-parkowego.

sprawa rozwojowa.

 (notabene między parkową a 29listopada też chodzą-odchylają sobie w jednym miejsu płotek)
DUGA (2021-12-07 01:43:21+00:00): This kind of building is usually considered as a service building.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/780036548/history#map=19/40.71701/-77.89170
mbeyerle (2021-12-07 02:36:49+00:00): good catch thanks DUGA
To clubber up (2020-03-11 07:16:51+00:00): Ciao papà’ addio
eggie (2020-03-11 08:02:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review... oneway:bicycle=no is inderdaad de goede manier.. Wanneer het ook voor brommers geldt kun je oneway:moped=no toevoegen. bicycle=yes hoeft niet op reguliere wegen. Dat is default. cycleway=opposite mag weg. Dat is de oude manier van taggen.
MVG,
Eggie
muralito (2020-03-11 12:50:35+00:00): Hola.

No entiendo porque estas eliminando las etiquetas oneway=no.

Borrar la etiqueta oneway=no es una perdida de informacion, porque alguien relevo y mapeo esa caracteristica de la calle.
tuxayo (2020-04-21 15:40:24+00:00): note liée: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2113435
Andrea Musuruane (2020-03-11 09:28:20+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Per favore, non usare le foto di Bing per riallineare gli elementi presenti, dato che non sono correttamente posizionate. Meglio usare "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" come riferimento. Ciao, Andrea
Rostaman521 (2020-03-11 00:03:41+00:00): U dokumentu su prisutne neke pravopisne pogreške (velika početna slova za "ulica", "trg", "sveti/sveta" itd. mimo početka naziva), neke sam ispravio
nurdafur (2021-02-12 09:36:41+00:00): Hallo Chriss

Du hast hier die Wanderrelation Sonnenstrahlweg erstellt. Ich bin gestern etwa die Hälfte des Weges abgelaufen, konnte aber nirgends irgendwelche Markierungen sehen. Vielleicht habe ich diese ja nur übersehen. Ansonsten sollte die Relation gelöscht werden.

Liebe Grüße
Urs
ChrissW-R1 (2021-02-12 10:15:56+00:00): Vielleicht verdeckt der Schnee aktuell die Markierung. -.-

Es handelt sich um eine gepflasterte rote Linie, welche an einigen Knotenpunkten eine Sonne bildet. Aus dieser Sonne "strahlen" zwei Linien in die beiden Richtungen ab.

Das Ganze ist natürlich nur zu sehen wenn man auf dem Bürgersteig diesen roten Steinen folgt, was ich letztes Jahr getan habe. Sofern also das Pflaster seitdem nicht geändert wurde, ist diese Relation korrekt.

Ein guter Einstiegspunkt für den Weg ist die Ampel am Signal-Iduna-Haus: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/253576908
nurdafur (2021-02-12 12:23:18+00:00): An der Ampel bin ich losgelaufen. Markierungen am Boden wären tatsächlich schwierig zu sehen gewesen. Ich schaue mir das nochmals an, wenn ich das nächste Mal  in der Stadt bin und der Schnee weg ist.
haukep (2021-10-25 14:14:32+00:00): Hi! Hast du zufällig mehr Informationen, was für ein Weg das ist und wieso er existiert?
Johnny Mapperseed (2020-03-11 00:19:50+00:00): OSIP was the reference imagery. Details were added from survey.
Natfoot (2020-05-25 01:55:22+00:00): Howdy, Sense we are having conversations in the comments section. The signals here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7091921118#map=19/39.76207/-104.99537 
If you look at the bing imagery you can see that the signal heads are pointed only in one direction rather than "both" I can see that this control point or railway=junction does have signals in both directions but have two locations of the signals.  Do you have updated information for this? What are your thoughts on signals position either in line or along side of the railway line?
chachafish (2020-05-25 03:36:53+00:00): It's been months since I touched these. I don't remember where I would have gotten the info. I checked some images I posted to Mapillary and you're correct. They are not pointed in both directions. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=oc3c-ogLxKCQ9aIzgmnL6w&focus=photo&lat=39.76209166666667&lng=-104.995125&z=17 That's easily fixed. I think they popped up on a QA tool because they didn't have a specified direction at the time. As to how they should be mapped...I try not to have opinions. Whenever possible I try to follow the OSM wiki. It says, "Signals are tagged as a point on the track." Feel free to modify these, or I can. Either way is fine with me. Cheers :)
Natfoot (2020-05-25 04:50:35+00:00): Thanks for the pointers at the Mapillary. I changed it as well as the signs that are there. I will need to go back and look at how to add the Begin CTC to OSM. CTC is Centerlized Traffic Control a dispatching system for the railroad. 
Regards,
Nat
chachafish (2020-05-25 04:57:57+00:00): 👍🏽 👍🏽 👍🏽
JJIglesias (2020-03-11 05:07:34+00:00): What kind of elements are you trying to map in Bolivia? square water is not an existing element for what I know of that area. Please clarify if you are trying to add water=basin and use the propper Tagging convention.
Thanks
JJ
user_5359 (2020-03-11 05:09:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add a key, if you don't know the value (e.g. height=unknown). A description isn’t the name of a building.
Dr Kludge (2020-03-14 21:27:15+00:00): GREGMAP1 there are routes that depend on existing ways.  You damage existing work by deleting the ways that are there.  You are not adding back information that was already there.  If you make these changes, then make them fully.  I am having to come behind you and fix your work.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-05-30 03:00:25+00:00): essas vias que criou estão fora do lugar correto. é possível desenhar com muita precisão usando a camada Strava  e Sentinel.
mariotomo (2020-03-12 22:44:56+00:00): Hi!  I had left this mangrove island unmapped, waiting to see who would finally edit it.  I had signalled it on the OSM Panama Telegram group, hoping locals would pick up the challenge.  anyway, thank you for your contribution, and for your attention to detail!