piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_2322809 (2020-05-03 07:40:41+00:00): The current situation is wrong as (de-facto) there is no one united Palstinian State. There are two territories controlled by different organizations: Gaza Strip controlled by Hamas Movement and West Bank partially controlled by Palestinian Authority which mainly run by Fatah Movement.
Additionally, many ares of west bank are now wrongly appears under "Palestinian Territory", in geocoders based on OSM.
The whole relation was not removed and kept for any future development.
Your changeset was reverted on changeset #84550701.
SomeoneElse (2020-05-10 12:29:43+00:00): @JimGum Aside from the discussion about the boundary, why did you remove the wikipedia tag from http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=1703814 in this changeset?
user_2322809 (2020-05-10 13:50:46+00:00): There is nothing to discuss about. The current situation does not reflect the reality, but only reflect the wishful thinking of some Palestinians and some anti-Israeli people.
Palestine is not one united state, therefore this relation should not have the boundary=* tag.
In addition, area C of west bank is not ruled by Palestinian Authority. The implications of the current situation are that the entire West Bank is appears as "Palestinian territory" in OSM-based geocoders, which is completely wrong. If you wish to keep this boundary=* tag, you should include in this relation of Palestine, only areas A & B of West Bank and not Area C. 
I deleted the wikipedia and wikidata tags because the articales there DOES NOT reflect the truth. There's a group of senior editors who are pro-Palestinian in Wikipedia, and they are forcing their propaganda there and preventing editing that reflects the actual situation regarding Palestine.
SomeoneElse (2020-05-10 13:58:33+00:00): > There is nothing to discuss 
There is - not least I think that it would be helpful for you to understand what the tags that your removed on http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=1703814 actually indicated.  That's why I suggested that you set out your evidence for "who controls what" on an international mailing list.
Best Regards,
Andy
literan (2020-05-02 22:31:53+00:00): не надо от балды писать текст в поле name. Там только имена собственные. Вычистил все.
Aryaanata (2020-05-02 22:50:12+00:00): Добрый день. Подскажите что именно некорректно указала. Постараюсь учесть в будущем. Я вижу тегов для некоторых участков не хватает (аллеи или скверы, например)
literan (2020-05-03 09:26:18+00:00): я, вроде, понятно написал: не надо от балды писать текст в __поле name__. Там только имена собственные. 

Никаких "посадки у дома", "площадка" и т.п. В принципе, в Москве все парки и скверы с именами давно нанесены.
Myazyk (2020-04-30 21:30:14+00:00): Назву школи слід наносити не на будівлю школи, а на територію подвір'я школи
orest_m_j (2020-04-30 22:17:33+00:00): Проводиться інвентаризації шкіл області. Існує стандартний обєкт будівля (школа) з тегами. Для ідентифікації обєкту будівлі школи потрібна назва, та повнв адреса,(індекс, вулиця, номер, будівлі та населений пункг). Крім того оскільки можливі помилки при заповнені рекомендують вносити ID (id_building) унікальний інформптивний ідентифікатор в межах держави. За відсутності цих даних про будівлю школи або відсутності обєкту школи експорт даних не здійснюється. Крім того це стандарт (див опис шкіл Польща) Всі дані узгоджені з Відділами освіти районів та будуть звірятися.Якшо ви знаєте інший спосіб внести дані про будівлі школи та ххню площу, та поверховість а потім екпортувати прошу пояснити. ДЯкую за розуміння.
Frans S (2020-05-01 13:29:47+00:00): Reviewed your mappings. See comment on Slack.
Please square always your buildings with the 
Q key.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84435251
SomeoneElse (2020-05-01 12:06:00+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
A quick question about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603552896 - would some other tag (perhaps man_made=pier) be appropriate here?  You've removed the building tag, but haven't eplaced it with anything else.  Also, it'd be really helpful if the changeset comment said a bit more than just "Remove tag".
Best Regards,
Andy
PS - any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
SomeoneElse (2020-05-01 12:06:42+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!
Быстрый вопрос о https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603552896 - подойдет ли здесь какой-нибудь другой тег (возможно, man_made = pier)? Вы удалили тег здания, но не заменили его чем-либо еще. Кроме того, было бы очень полезно, если бы комментарий к ревизии содержал чуть больше, чем просто «Удалить тег».
Наилучшие пожелания,
Энди
PS - любые вопросы, пожалуйста, не стесняйтесь спрашивать.
unwirklich (2020-05-04 05:47:16+00:00): Yes, this is my mistake. Thank you for your comment
user_5359 (2020-05-02 10:26:43+00:00): Hello! Please check the tag Earth=sum from node http://www.osm.org/node/7468237269
Osmegnos (2020-04-30 20:20:27+00:00): Hallo,
sehr schöne Fortschritte, aber bitte keine Wege mit Areas oder Administrativen Grenzen verkleben. Das ist bei dem Radweg mindestens 2x geschehen. Das machen andere zwar auch, sollte man aber vermeiden. Der Grund ist, dass wenn Knoten an Wegen verschoben werden, auch die Areas und Grenzen verschoben, Wenn Knoten an 
Areas und Grenzen verschoben werden, werden die Wege mit verschoben. Um das zu  vermeiden, müssen die Verbindungen erst wieder aufgelöst werden. Wenn man mit Filtern arbeitet, dann kann man übersehen, dass an einem Objekt ein anderes mit dran klebt.
siehe dazu die Diskussion im Forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64158

Weiterhin viel Spass
Syntrox (2020-05-01 11:28:24+00:00): ok
Osmegnos (2020-05-01 13:19:54+00:00): Hallo,
bei diesem Changeset sind doch noch ein paar Fehler.
1. Cycleway wird nur verwendet, wenn z.B.  ein Radweg auf der Straße aufgemalt ist.
siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway Bei Mappilary habe ich mir die Berkenbrücker Chaussee angesehen. Es handelt sich um einen kombinierte Fuß/radweg. Bitte den cycleway wieder löschen und den Fußweg ändern.

2.Bahnhofstrasse "give_way;crossing"
verursacht eine Fehlermeldung. Was ist das? Ich würde es weglassen.

Ich schlage vor, nicht solche großen Änderungssätze anzulegen, lieber mehr kleinere. Dann kann man Fehler besser korrigieren oder reverten.

Außerdem empfehle ich, JOSM als editor zu verwenden. Vieles wird dadurch einfacher. es gbt auch links zu den features. So hätte man wie in diesem Fall mit einem Klick die Erklärung zu zu dem cycleway bekommen.
Vor dem Hochladen wird man auf mögliche fehler hingewiesen. 

Bei Fragen bitte melden.

Viele Grüße
Benutzername187 (2020-05-01 14:35:08+00:00): Hallo,
also den Fußweg zum Mehrzweckweg machen? Ich habe den Radweg gelöscht und finde keine Fehlermeldung...
Liebe Grüße
Benutzername187 (2020-05-01 15:08:40+00:00): Ich habe den Teil das Fußweges wo ein "Fahrräder frei" schilt steht zum Mehrzweckweg gemacht und da wo es geteilt ist Rad und Fußweg
janolezab (2020-04-30 19:50:09+00:00): (Uff, nächstes Mal nehme ich für sowas JOSM)
janolezab (2020-04-30 19:57:13+00:00): (iD scheint es aber noch nicht zu verstehen…)
janolezab (2020-04-30 20:00:22+00:00): Und Mapnik ebensowenig 🤔
eggie (2020-04-30 20:27:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-30 20:31:37+00:00): review:  
Dag Lekn
Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.. Je krijgt dan vaak onbedoelde verschuivingen.
Halewijn heeft geen shoptag meer, maar wel nog de naam. Kijk nog even. Voor de rest ziet het er netjes uit.
Je edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=84436407
MVG,
Eggie
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-03-04 02:02:55+00:00): hey, voce definiu um condominio como uma prisao? por favor, não faça mais edições deste tipo
user_2066394 (2020-05-05 14:26:49+00:00): statt löschen gerne ein lifecycle prefix dazugeben, dann bleibt der ort nachvollziehbar

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84437116
Britzz (2020-04-30 22:17:57+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : c'est tout bon :-)

Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).
Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84437365
ma-rt-in (2020-05-03 16:56:23+00:00): Hallo,
was genau soll hier sein? Auf dem Esri Sat-Bild steht hier ein landwirtschaftlicher Schuppen.
vg
outcast5 (2020-05-03 17:00:09+00:00): Hallo,
du hat recht. Die Kapelle liegt einen Weg tiefer. Ich werde das korrigieren.
Danke für den Hinweis.
VG
user_2066394 (2020-05-05 14:25:32+00:00): statt löschen gerne ein lifecycle prefix dazugeben, dann bleibt der ort nachvollziehbar

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84437509
Frans S (2020-05-01 13:08:01+00:00): Hello. I reviewed your mapping acc to your request.
Rather good mapped. A remark,
you mapped on this changeset a piece of road as unclassified highway, continued on another changeset as path. just 50 meters, and continues further as unclassified. This is not logic and don't work with navigation systems. A car can select unclassified highways, but not paths. So the route here ends at the path. :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84437593
eggie (2020-04-30 21:02:31+00:00): Tip: Gebouwen worden niet zelf ingetekend, maar geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG (Kadaster) 
Je kunt import versnellen middels een verzoek op het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Inlog identiek aan OSM account. 
Iets veranderen heeft meestal weinig zin door periodieke import. 
MVG,
Eggie
Anakil (2020-05-01 09:34:16+00:00): Hello Xiovas,

Following the community review, I have reverted your edit here because of this reason :  the imagery (old topo map) used from NGI is not compatible with OSM license and should not be used to edit the map.

Furthermore, these subminicipalities have no existence officially and are historic boundaries that don't really reflect the current situation on the ground as the boundary of municipalities were changed since that date (especially following a map from 1969). 

Kind Regards,
Anakil
Member of OpenStreetMap Belgium
Xiovas (2020-05-01 19:08:08+00:00): Hello Anakil,

Apologies, didn't know that. Are there other resources I can use? I saw that many other communes in Brabant Wallon had their submunicipalities mapped (e.g. Rixensart) so I tried to do the same for Wavre.

Kind regards,
Xiovas
Anakil (2020-05-01 20:02:11+00:00): From what i know, there is no source for submunicipalities as they really don't exist anymore officially. The only way to have them was to have the old boundaries before the merging (like we do in some case in Flanders where the merging happened quite recently). And for few places where the municipality release as open data this information (like Antwerpen with the districts and old subminicipalities).

Here for the subminicipalities boundaries that exist in Brabant Wallon, it is mainly guessing it and using some derived old source like cadastre (it is open but the accuracy of the data is really poor and often not really recommended) and some really old maps that are not with a copyright like the "Vandermaelen map" of 1850 (but again it could be questionable if it is still relevant). If you think that such information is useful then it could be added based on that and some guessing to fit to current situation. 

Kind Regards,
Anakil
eggie (2020-04-30 21:23:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review volgt.. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-04-30 21:28:02+00:00): Voor het juiste formaat van de opningstijden kun je deze tool gebruiken.
Het resultaat plak je dan in de value.
openingsuren-tool

http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Een jachthaven kun je het beste als leisure=marina taggen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dmarina

Dat kan op een adresnode op het haven gebouw... kan ook in de haven. 
We taggen niet op de gebouwen zelf. 
Het gebouw heet niet jachthaven Steenbergen.
Kijk je nog even>
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-01 08:06:47+00:00): Bij de jachthaven heb ik wat aangepast.
Mvg eggie
kartonage (2020-05-01 05:45:14+00:00): Hej crisitunity,

have you discussed this mass edit with the community? Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct for further information.

Cheers
Frans S (2020-05-01 12:48:49+00:00): Hello. Reviewed these mappings.  Be sure not connecting nodes of a building to a highway. These are errors.
You also tagged a rather thin trace as unclassified highway. Path was a better tag here, but the highway on the left size  into the fields did not to be mapped.  Did you see the Guidance for road tagging in Tanzania? see page 14 and around what or what not to be mapped.  I removed them
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84438903
Frans S (2020-05-01 12:39:29+00:00): Hi. Reviewed your work.  Siwilde commented already.
I just squared the buildings here
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84438933
eggie (2020-04-30 21:29:37+00:00): Lijkt me prima zo.. Scholen kun je ook op het schoolterrein taggen.
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Education_features
Mapse verder,
eggie
Myazyk (2020-04-30 21:40:17+00:00): Що то за за будівля школи така, розмірами приблизно 50х50 метрів у селі? (Я вже виправив).
Робіть розумні редагування!
Myazyk (2020-04-30 21:41:33+00:00): Ой, не туди написав коментар
Frans S (2020-05-01 11:49:12+00:00): Reviewed as per your request. Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84439650
Sucursal de Neos (2021-09-01 08:17:33+00:00): Cra.3 No.20a-27 Las Mercedes Pasto
mapper999 (2020-05-01 18:09:04+00:00): Hi,
wurde bei einem Unfall zerstört und soll wieder aufgebaut werden: https://feedback.karlsruhe.de/reportId=9a58cabf-cc42-416f-aec6-3eac22486755
Schröcker (2020-05-04 12:50:20+00:00): Hallo,
dann sollte man das fixme löschen oder abändern oder ???. Ich bitte um weitere Bearbeitung.
Danke!
mapper999 (2020-05-09 09:58:55+00:00): Ich habe das Fixme angepasst.
karson_ (2020-05-04 01:58:37+00:00): You changed the address of a building located in Denver, Iowa. Iowa is not Colorado. You should changed the state back to IA.
Tech Learning Collective (2020-05-04 02:00:54+00:00): Our bad, apologies. Fixed.
vasony-qa (2020-05-19 05:55:10+00:00): Szia!

Az iskola épületére nem szükséges átmásolni az iskola pontjait, így most duplán szerepelt, visszajavítottam.
Az iskolák címkézése: amenity=school az egész iskola területe (kerítésen belül), building=school az épületek.
A tulajdonságokat az amenity school részne lehet hozzáadni.

Tamás
SomeoneElse (2020-05-10 13:35:30+00:00): Hello GlennPowers,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7468552251 looks a bit odd - is it really called "Massive Erosion"?  What actually is it?
Best Regards,
Andy
PT-53 (2020-05-01 07:00:19+00:00): Hallo Ibu,
Du hast an diesem Sendemast
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1727109788/history
das Merkmal
name=27012724
eingetragen.
Das Merkmal Name ist nur für echte Eigennamen vorgesehen. 27012724 gehört nicht dazu. Das ist wohl passender in ref aufgehoben. Ich habe das entspr. abgeändert.
Grüße
PS Wiki ref:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ref?uselang=de
lbu (2020-05-02 13:19:52+00:00): Hallo PT-53, danke für den Hinweis. Habe den anderen Masten ebenfalls angepasst.
DP24PH (2020-05-01 00:53:56+00:00): Hello! It seems that the changeset boundary may encroach the parts of the Republic of the Philippines. The only recommendation is to separate the changeset per country (unless international ferry) and to be guided always on the mapping guidelines per country. Your kind understanding is highly appreciated. Thank you very much.

DEARPAUL24
Adam Ravn (2020-05-01 14:42:56+00:00): Thank you DearPaulPH
Obviously a complete blunder. I'm unsure how to undo / cancel the seporate nodes in the changeset - even how to just undo the creation of the entire changeset. As of now I can only delete the nodes, and add them again one by one, which, if this was a much larger changeset, would prove cumbersome. I'm sure there is a more elegant way.
I will be much more exact in adding new edits in the future, and read up on national guides.
trigpoint (2020-05-01 12:42:38+00:00): Other than a literal translation, what is the source of this name:cy?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-06-21 10:40:20+00:00): I removed it
aceman444 (2021-07-17 15:40:15+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za doplnanie odbocovacich pruhov, len pozor kde presne su umiestnene. Napr. na https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84442577 nie su 2 pruhy po celej dlzke ale len v jednej tretine v strede. Idem to zaktualizovat.
Illio (2021-07-17 17:56:33+00:00): Nie som si istý, o akých odbočovacích pruhoch hovoríte. V tejto zmene som, pokiaľ viem, pomenoval ulice.
aceman444 (2021-07-24 22:26:30+00:00): Pardon, dal som zly odkaz. Napr. tu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471991875/history ste pridali aj 'lanes' a 'turn:lanes' ktore su nespravne. V rovnakej zmene ste tejto ceste pridali asi 5 bodov, ktore som ja zase odobral (rozdelenim cesty). Takze je mozne, ze se len kvoli novemu pomenovaniu spojili viac ciest do jednej, ale nevsimli ste si, ze maju rozne vlastnosti (znacky).
blackboxlogic (2020-05-01 18:28:25+00:00): When you add a building where there is an address node, feel free to delete the address node. Thanks for your changes!

Example:
you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/798537665
and you could have deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7289636941 because you had already copied the tags from it and there is no reason to have both.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84442650
mueschel (2020-05-02 11:02:09+00:00): Hi,
I would like to point out that it's not necessary to add a large amount of wikipedia tags in different languages to objects - one is sufficient. The articles are linked in wikipedia itself, so all available language versions can be found easily without having many tags in OSM.

Cheers
Jan
MapMakerGal (2020-05-02 11:05:21+00:00): It never hurts to add this information, it's something they always told me, and it doesn't bother anyone.  Cheers :)
mueschel (2020-05-02 11:13:38+00:00): For sure it doesn't hurt, but Wiki is quite clear about it:
"only provide a link to a single Wikipedia article"
"In almost all cases, a single wikipedia tag is sufficient. Data users can access articles in other languages using Wikipedia's interlanguage links"
MapMakerGal (2020-05-02 11:17:08+00:00): I was discussing it with the Spanish community on their telegram and there are opinions for all tastes. It is not something so transcendent, it is true that it can be redundant, but well, it is already done and I will try not to do it anymore.
Many thanks!
user_5359 (2021-12-27 17:30:39+00:00): Hello! Please check the relgion value buddisth1 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778025325. Did you mean buddisth?
cronoser (2020-05-09 15:45:39+00:00): Hola, ¿de donde viene dicho nombre?
Un saludo
mariuco (2020-05-09 17:10:12+00:00): A que nombre te refieres?
mariuco (2020-05-09 17:11:19+00:00): Si es "camino divertido" es el nombre de un segmento de Strava que coincide con ese sendero
cronoser (2020-05-09 23:01:44+00:00): hola, 
me refería a "camino divertido", aunque sea un segmento en Strava, no es el nombre oficial y no debería aparecer dicho nombre, a lo sumo con la etiqueta: loc_name="Camino divertido".
Un saludo
user_5359 (2021-12-27 17:43:43+00:00): Hello again! Please check also the religion value of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778005864
korolenok (2020-05-07 13:17:08+00:00): Hey! 
Please, stop using `leisure=park` with number in `name` over buildings. This is considered as vandalism and is not acceptable. 

And in addition, please use shortcut Q to square the corners of buildings. They look very inaccurate if not use the shortcut.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84444385
trigpoint (2020-05-01 12:44:40+00:00): Removing correct and valid data from OSM is not ok. Add name:cy, where it is valid is fine but in general the primary language in Glamorgan is English.
trigpoint (2020-05-01 12:47:46+00:00): Also why have you changed  Ffordd y Dywysoges Margared to secondary, an isolated section of B road is a bit unlikely.
user_11034976 (2020-05-06 00:01:06+00:00): The primary official languages of "Glamorgan" are English AND Welsh.
blackboxlogic (2020-05-01 18:19:57+00:00): Welcome back to OSM (looks like you took a break). I've been adding address nodes in Maine. When you add buildings, feel free to delete the address nodes and move the details to the buildings you add. Though I understand if you don't because it's more work. Thanks for adding buildings!
emulsi (2020-05-02 01:59:44+00:00): I did take a break. But I have been home now seven weeks, and I'm getting board. I will look at addressing.
Frans S (2020-07-27 10:35:30+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
Please pay attention on the issues brought up by the Issue triangle on the right hand menu.
You ignored 9 issues which should be corrected before uploading your work.
See also my PM to you
tastrax (2020-05-04 04:55:27+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tastrax (2020-05-04 04:56:37+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
blackboxlogic (2020-05-01 18:14:13+00:00): 04043 came from Maine's E911 dataset, which I've been trusting until I have a reason not to. USPS agrees with your change. Thanks for the fix.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84446402
jleedev (2020-05-28 23:04:21+00:00): Gas station pumps are usually building=roof.
eggie (2020-05-01 05:53:36+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
cgrowe (2020-05-01 13:42:50+00:00): I mainly used Bing Aerial Imagery as this gave me a better vision and most of the other users before me also used this. I used Maxar Premium Imagery to double check. I mapped all the buildings and corrected some of the previously mapped ones. I didn't correct all, as they may have seen a building I couldn't see etc. I will have a look at the roads next.
stevea (2020-05-01 05:02:39+00:00): I don't know about this one.  If you know the name, please enter the name in the database using the name= key.
stevea (2020-05-01 05:04:13+00:00): I have used name_absent=yes to replace Name=Unknown Name from an import, so I think I understand something about the edge.

OSM is a database.  It isn't about how Standard rendering looks, but I'd say it looks pretty good and the recent improvements are appreciated!