piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rainero (2022-02-13 22:26:36+00:00): Hi Pieter,  

with the QS tool OSM inspector I found many duplicated points in the ways of buildings in Merchtem. Those in the screenshot https://ibb.co/wQPjwRb I have corrected, but there are more: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.23152&lat=50.95943&zoom=18&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way  
I suspect that is caused by the editor MapComplete, as I have seen other edits recently, but those had only a few of these errors.  
Maybe you can check after a new edit, if you can identify how the issue appears or maybe MapComplete is not the ideal editor for buildings?

Bye,
Rainer
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-02-13 23:48:52+00:00): Hi Rainer,

These buildings have been made by a somewhat experimental import tool. I also noticed those duplicate points, and updated the import tool to prevent duplicate points from being added to ways.

That being said, I didn't come around cleaning up the old points.

By the way, what is your process of fixing these duplicate points? I didn't find an easy way in JOSM to fix them.

Kind regards,
Pieter
Rainero (2022-02-14 13:20:37+00:00): Hi Pieter,  
understan, so it is not generally MapComplete.
In JOSM I fixed it with  
1. run the validator to get all the errors and warnings listed and marked  
2. the easier case: a simplepoint in the outline of one building:  
select the point, use the shortcut g which makes 2 separate points at the same position, move the selected point (which is the upper of the 2points) a bit aside and delete it; the other point at the original position remains  
3. the a bit mor complicated cas: the duplicate point is common with the neighbor building. In that case you need to know to which building it belongs. For that I used the list of the errors, selected one, right-clicked + zoom to problem, then I selected the building and the duplicated point and used g , which now deconnects it from the neighbor building. The rest is like in 2.: use g again on the selcted point, move the upper of the 2 points aside and delete it. Finally I merged the now single point with that from the neighbor building that was originally a common point (select both + shortcut m).  
I am only not sure, whether the shortcut g is from utilsplugin-2 or another plugin.
You can skip the move aside of the upper point and delete it directly, the bottom point remains, but the moving visualised me that I am doing right.

Best regards,
Rainer
user_5359 (2022-02-12 12:40:08+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9496744429? Which type of diet did you mean?
mini-me (2022-02-11 19:50:17+00:00): Не надо выдумывать иностранные названия
Kovoschiz (2022-02-11 03:39:30+00:00): It's likely this leads to a carpark inside.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-11 04:56:04+00:00): Although truly wrong when connected to the road uphill.
MxxCon (2022-02-12 06:04:57+00:00): You mapped this as "site" relation. According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:site it seems like if situation is suitable it's preferable to use other types. I think here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon is a suitable match with both sections being tagged as "outer".

At the same time I'm not sure if this situation warrants the complexities that relation brings. Perhaps map the whole dog park as a single area and just draw a fence between the two sections? Similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/955051726
Nat Bradley (2022-02-12 13:15:10+00:00): Yeah, I think I was overcomplicating it. I followed your advise and changed it to one large dog park and added a fence.
Thanks for your help!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117320789
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-11 06:39:27+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (462)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ff5722 (2022-09-18 11:51:28+00:00): The city node also applies for county seats https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/China/Boundaries#%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%8E%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E5%85%B1%E5%92%8C%E5%9B%BD%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E5%8C%BA%E5%88%92%E6%A6%82%E8%BF%B0:~:text=County%2Dlevel%20administrative%20district%3A%20place%3Dcity
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-11 19:19:30+00:00): Please read.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-13 03:09:05+00:00): 您好，“新疆维吾尔医学专科学校新校区”是否已建成？根据卫星影像，它还是什么都没有建设的
因此，对于建设中的内容，应保留landuse=construction
construction=college
这是一个组合标签，在确认一定建成以后，应移除这两个标签（都得移除）并用amenity=college代替
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-13 03:10:29+00:00): 我已在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117341081 中将该学校的状态回退到之前，若您确信它已建成，请您按照规范的标注方法移除建设中状态。感谢！
G_P_J (2022-02-16 14:09:03+00:00): Proszę o podanie źródła informacji o adresie budynku kościoła. Portal gminny i Geoportal nie podają takiego adresu.
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-11 06:39:24+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (462)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
tastrax (2022-02-21 02:45:35+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-17 14:32:01+00:00): Why were these houses deleted?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117268219
Allison P (2022-02-17 15:06:08+00:00): They're row houses, but I mapped them separately a few years ago as a greener mapper. I just didn't feel like remapping them at the time.
CurlingMan13 (2022-05-29 10:41:16+00:00): Can you elaborate more on what you do in your changesets or why?  Putting "a" does not help us in understanding what was done or why.  Thanks.
Glassman (2022-02-11 22:33:01+00:00): #TIP: In addition to the name, it is good to add a tag to describe the feature, in this case leisure=park. Can you update your edit? Let me know if you need help
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117268303
G_P_J (2022-02-14 22:18:14+00:00): Skąd informacja, że kościół ma numer 17? Wg Geoportalu budynek kościoła to nr 15.
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-11 06:39:15+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (462)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
G_P_J (2022-02-14 22:21:32+00:00): Skąd informacja, że jest to nr 33? Taki numer nie występuje w Geoportalu.
G_P_J (2022-02-14 22:34:49+00:00): Skąd informacja, że jest to nr 37? Wg Geoportalu ten budynek nie ma numeru.
snoozingnewt (2022-02-11 02:30:59+00:00): Oops - I also added another forest near Webster Springs too
balint36 (2022-12-20 20:29:10+00:00): Szia!
Most nézem utólag, hogy ezzel a szerkesztéssel a 2108-as és a 21128-as utaknál (Balassagyarmat) lévő több vonalból álló körforgalmat egy vonallá alakítottad.
Bocsi, hogy így fogalmazok, de ez kifejezetten káros volt, mert az a körforgalom különböző szakaszain áthaladó autóbuszok (azokhoz tartozó kapcsolatok) miatt volt szétvágva, az egyesítéssel meg mindent egybe gyúrtál.
Például annál a vonalnál (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9603652), ahol a körforgalom egyik oldalán bemegy a busz, vele szembeni kijáraton kimegy, ezáltal a körforgalomnak csak a felét járja be, most már úgy lett jelölve, hogy az egész körforgalmat bejárja. Nem véletlenül volt úgy szakaszokra bontva, ahogy eddig is volt.
balint36 (2023-01-02 12:05:52+00:00): Rendben, akkor ne válaszolj.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-20 12:42:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117636871 where the changeset comment is: Undoing a golf node drag in the US (more work may be required afterwards)
SomeoneElse (2022-02-20 13:32:12+00:00): See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117636871 that explain what I did to patch up the golf course afterwards.
ivanbranco (2022-02-11 21:38:23+00:00): Ciao openangelo,

la prassi è mantenere nel tag name solo il nome piu' utilizzato, ulteriori nomi si possono aggiungere in alt_name, es:
name=Villa Ilderis
alt_name=Torre del Conte
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117269480
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Dimacn (2022-02-11 06:40:19+00:00): Скажите пожалуйста, реально у вас улицы называется в формате Переулок №1 ?
Dimacn (2022-02-11 06:48:36+00:00): Скажите пожалуйста, реально на этом проезде стоят знаки ограничения скорости 40? И дорога однополосная? И кажется у вас опечатка в названии, должно быть: Берёзовый проезд.  Соглашение о наименованиях улиц в OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
ivanbranco (2022-02-11 21:41:37+00:00): Ciao openangelo,

bicycle=yes+foot=yes+horse=yes sono già impliciti in highway=track, vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Italy

Inoltre name	Ingresso Laterale destro della villa Ilderis. non va bene, il tag name=* va utilizzato solo per nomi propri, per le descrizioni c'è il tag description=*

Per capirci non si tagga una fontana come name=Fontana, ma si può taggare name=Fontana di Trevi in quanto è un nome proprio
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117269742
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-02-13 03:03:04+00:00): 您好，尊敬的wanderer09
故宫旁边的这些水系是属于关系的，在关系内它只需要作为一根线，而不需要添加此类关系。

您不慎做出了善意的破坏。您另外的三个变更集中给建筑关系中增加线上的building=yes依然是善意的破坏，我会安排其他同志回退您的编辑。

此外，注意到您的账号与wandergis很相似，若您属于wandergis公司，您的一切编辑需要按照组织编辑指南申报。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117270383
user_10360149 (2022-02-13 03:29:08+00:00): wanderer09您好
关系内的线条不需要带水体或建筑的标签，建筑部分也是一种合法的标签，因此回退了您的这些编辑
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117341339
user_10360149 (2022-02-13 03:29:14+00:00): wanderer09您好
关系内的线条不需要带水体或建筑的标签，建筑部分也是一种合法的标签，因此回退了您的这些编辑
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117341339
ovruni (2022-02-11 04:54:12+00:00): Hola "ildo muhary putra" en este conjunto de cambios donde se ha utilizado Bing, se ha ampliado una vía residencial que pasa por un área donde parece existir parte de esta vía, por la que la he recortado. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Dimacn (2022-02-11 06:24:41+00:00): Зачем вы переименовали Трактовую улицу? Пожалуйста придерживайтесь правил наименований улиц в OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог  Должно быть: Трактовая улица, Радужная улица, Полевая улица и т.д.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:37:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:37:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-02-12 08:12:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не имеет значения главная Садовая улица или не главная. Статус дороги определяет важность дороги во всей сети, а не то главная она или второстепенная. Пожалуйста, почитайте рекомендации в вики и остановите войну правок.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
mavl (2022-05-20 15:37:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
wireguy (2022-02-11 16:27:39+00:00): Rich, can you look more closely at your change?   I think you accidently dragged half the golf course outline.  Also please read the wiki on mapping golf courses: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
mavl (2022-02-12 08:16:11+00:00): Здравствуйте. Навигатор может построить маршрут по дороге с любым статусом. Хоть residential, хоть service. Если там проходит именно ваш маршрут, то это не повод менять статус.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
mavl (2022-02-12 08:20:24+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
  
Ещё раз. Статус дороги не показывает главная дорога или не главная. Вы и так уже подняли статусы всех дорог, по которым вы ездите, до tertiary. Остановитесь, пожалуйста и не обозначайте дороги под ваш навигатор.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway  
  
Если ваш навигатор неправильно строит маршрут, то нужно обратиться к создателю вашего навигатора с сообщением об ошибке, а не менять карту под ваш навигатор.
user_10360149 (2022-02-13 03:29:37+00:00): wanderer09您好
关系内的线条不需要带水体或建筑的标签，建筑部分也是一种合法的标签，因此回退了您的这些编辑
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117341339
user_11609320 (2022-02-11 06:30:01+00:00): Would anyone mind if I eliminated the eastbound route and just kept one route instead of two. there was five duplicates for route 20. but maintaining it was difficult and confusing when I was trying to add bus stops. I don't want to delete other people's work, but I do want to make it easier for future mappers to maintain changes when it gets rerouted
user_10360149 (2022-02-13 03:29:44+00:00): wanderer09您好
关系内的线条不需要带水体或建筑的标签，建筑部分也是一种合法的标签，因此回退了您的这些编辑
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117341339
user_5359 (2022-02-11 16:27:04+00:00): Hello! Is this the same import like https://www.osm.org/changeset/117201094 and https://www.osm.org/changeset/117228248?

Please stop importing this data multiple times!

Please read and understand the comment! Unfortunately I can't see which languages you speak
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-02-13 02:07:34+00:00): You edited lines that destroyed associated routes, the error has been fixed, be more careful next time as you are destroying others' work, Greetings
Editou linhas que destruiram rotas associadas, o erro foi corrigido, tenha mais cuidado de uma proxima vez pois está a destruir trabalho de outros, Cumprimentos
HaPe-CZ (2022-02-14 07:27:02+00:00): I do not consider straightening the paths according to the street axis to be damage. So are the tram tracks.
I don't see you correcting anything in the history. What exactly is it about?
DD1GJ (2022-02-11 07:50:28+00:00): alles rückgängig gemacht, chaotischer Marketing-Eintrag incl. verschobener Straße

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
ququruzka (2022-06-12 09:40:04+00:00): Вулиці на території України вказуються виключно українською мовою.
topius (2022-02-11 14:09:53+00:00): An airport should not be tagged as a building. In addition, I believe that this airport is only in its planning stage. Only actually existing features should be added to OSM.
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-02-13 02:07:51+00:00): You edited lines that destroyed associated routes, the error has been fixed, be more careful next time as you are destroying others' work, Greetings
Editou linhas que destruiram rotas associadas, o erro foi corrigido, tenha mais cuidado de uma proxima vez pois está a destruir trabalho de outros, Cumprimentos
HaPe-CZ (2022-02-14 07:26:54+00:00): I do not consider straightening the paths according to the street axis to be damage. So are the tram tracks.
I don't see you correcting anything in the history. What exactly is it about?
Supaplex (2022-02-11 10:09:34+00:00): american0831 畫得建築差很大
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117276490
Eifelkobold! (2022-02-21 09:33:20+00:00): Ich habe diesen Änderungssatz in Änderungssatz 117671719 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117671719) teilweise zurückgesetzt.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:37:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:37:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
ivanbranco (2022-09-22 10:13:00+00:00): Hi Qotola,

why connecting the landuse=grass to the motorway?
osmviborg (2022-02-11 09:39:10+00:00): 👍
H4N5-antw (2022-02-11 10:21:14+00:00): Waarde @Jakka, 
Dank voor uw note, dat deel met fine gravel is idd gravel op (aangevulde) grond tussen soort keermuren uit natuursteenbrokken in wat wel Gabion cages worden genoemd :u ziet een voorbeeld onder het 'bankje' op 't nog te tekenen eilandje; daarnaast 2022-02-10 prentjes getrokken / opgeladen ter verduidelijking.
pesec (2022-02-11 11:33:03+00:00): Добрый день.
Данным пакетом правок вы присвоили нескольким зданиям статус многоквартирных домов, хотя они находятся на территории строительной площадки. Если вы обладаете информацией, что эти дома действительно сданы, то необходимо изменить контур строительства.
pesec (2022-02-11 11:33:49+00:00): Ряд ваших правок испортил геометрию объектов. Пожалуйста, следите внимательно за вносимыми изменениями.
Syl (2023-11-22 14:41:39+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé cette modification, ça ne semble pas être le cabinet d'un docteur en médecine.
Carto_Graph (2022-02-11 12:32:52+00:00): crossing:island понятно, не нужен. А lit и sidewalk зачем убирать?
Ars-UA (2022-02-11 13:52:44+00:00): Потому что добавляют от фонаря. Sidewalk там никакого нет, они есть разве что на трассах, и то не на всех. А lit на пешеходных дорожках есть по проспекту Мира, в парке на Драмтеатре и может ещё где. Свет от соседней дороги или луны не считается.
Carto_Graph (2022-02-12 11:23:09+00:00): Понятно, я думал человек понимает, что делает.

Ну а здесь ведь sidewalk есть?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399307912
Ars-UA (2022-02-12 13:43:29+00:00): Sidewalk - это ведь обочина. Вот как на трассе Мариуполь - Никольское. На Мангуш не помню, есть или нет. На Старый Крым нет, там по дороге ходят оглядываются. По Флотской кое-где тротуары есть, я добавил.
MrX_ua (2022-02-12 14:36:45+00:00): sidewalk це тротуар. Узбічча - shoulder
Marcel-NL (2022-03-02 11:17:49+00:00): Hoi Andre. Je hebt Mortelweg (noord-zuid stuk) aangepast van residential naar tertiary, maar deze weg is recent opnieuw bestraat en is een smalle, doodlopende weg die alleen bedoeld is voor aanwonenden. Het oost-west gedeelte van de Mortelweg is wel tertiary omdat een van de twee toegangswegen is tot de wijk. Dit stuk is ook veel breder en heeft max snelheid van 60.
P.S. Ik woon hier om de hoek ;-)
П3тр0виЧъ (2022-02-14 03:21:01+00:00): Откат. Не нужно под валидатор править.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117278142
mavl (2022-05-20 15:37:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Dave Venables (2022-02-11 12:17:03+00:00): I've updated surrounding buildings to match your spelling and hyphenation https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117285698 but am not sure what is truely correct. Did you have a source or was it from a local survey?
Dave Venables (2022-02-11 14:40:44+00:00): Cast iron street sign in the building passage https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/747895613 says "LOCK UP YARD" without any hyphens; this agrees with 2 out of 3 of the Food Standards entries including https://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/1083108/Tangs-Kitchen-Derby 
Leaving as "Lock Up Yard" as amended today
eggie (2022-02-11 11:10:29+00:00): Dag paver... Maar even het standaard antwoord.....  Je bent niet de enige dit dit zo doet..

Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. Dit gebeurt meestal om het spel PokemonGo te beïnvloeden. 
Je verwijdert de details en vervangt deze door een transparant.  
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam.  

Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse. 

Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665 

 MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-11 11:18:07+00:00): De landuse heb ik weer hersteld.. het is gras en wat bomen.
Dit zijn geen parken zoals bv het Vondelpark in A'dam.
gr eggie
yuliyaKoldaeva (2022-02-11 09:21:12+00:00): на карте дорога не отредактировалась, участок дороги не добавился
user_5359 (2022-02-12 19:38:51+00:00): Добро пожаловать в OSM! Как вы думаете, что означает ключ 69H-8? Если это дорога, то я рекомендую использовать клавишу "highway".
skquinn (2022-02-13 06:52:48+00:00): 1. "fix boundaries" is almost useless as a changeset comment. What boundaries were you fixing, and why?
2. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets -- please read and try to follow going forward.
Lee Carré (2022-02-14 20:10:00+00:00): Seconding skquinn.
Lee Carré (2022-02-16 07:39:04+00:00): “useless […] changeset comment. What boundaries were you fixing, and why?”

What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Felis Pimeja (2022-02-17 22:06:59+00:00): Ok. Thank you for advice. I'll try to make more descriptive comments.

Speaking about that particular changeset - it mostly contains routine fixes of broken boundaries relations.
frozenrabi (2022-02-14 04:29:25+00:00): Are these features track? I am afraid these are not tracks. This may be waterways. I do not know the topography of Somalia. Correct me if i am wrong.
ivanbranco (2022-02-11 21:26:23+00:00): Please consider adding meaningful changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

Also, it would be cool to reply to other users comments sometimes: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=9059129
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117279713
maraf24 (2022-02-11 12:27:19+00:00): Wojna edycyjna?
Yunkers (2022-02-11 13:25:47+00:00): Eee, a teraz fragment DK35 stał się tertiary? Powoli kończą ci się możliwości, już chyba próbowałeś zmieniać wszystkie drogi w okolicy xD
Warin61 (2022-06-07 07:10:47+00:00): Hi,
The area=court, sport=handball ...
Well area=court should be leisure=pitch.
The OSM handball wiki does not match - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asport%3Dhandball
The sport is four_square
zorglubu (2022-02-11 12:44:18+00:00): Bonjour,

merci d'avoir mis à jour OpenStreetMap.
Mais notez que si vous changez l'adresse de la maison paroissiale sans déplacer le noeud lui-même sur la carte, elle va rester là où elle est : avenue Gourdault.
Si vous souhaitez de l'aide, n'hésitez pas à me le dire en répondant à ce commentaire. Bien cordialement.
PAROISSE SAINT-LOUIS (2022-02-11 15:32:50+00:00): Bonjour et merci de votre message. Je recours bien volontiers à votre aide pour le déplacement dont vous faites mention. je ne suis pas coutumier de ce genre de pratique. Bien cordialement.
zorglubu (2022-02-11 18:19:15+00:00): Je l'ai déplacée ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/48.76759/2.40756
Merci de me dire si ce n'est pas exactement au bon endroit.
Attention, il faut parfois une heure ou deux pour que la carte se mette à jour.
Nölke75 (2022-03-10 17:54:03+00:00): Hallo Joop,
je hebt de naam aangepast maar dit is Meuleveldlaan volgens het bordje op de fietwegwegwijzer bij de kruising met het fietspad naar de Zuiderbrug/Molenbossen.
Joopvdl (2022-03-10 18:04:00+00:00): Op de kop van de Molenbossen staat de straatnaambord met "Van Boerlostraat" [1]

Volgens de BRT is het stuk weg tussen Molenbossen en het fietspad achter de flats langs ook de Van Boerlostraat terwijl de BGT zegt dat dit stuk weg de Meulenveldlaan is.

Ik zal eens een melding maken op verbeter de kaart om daar duidelijkheid in te krijgen.

[1] https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=257315032847022