piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Harvesterify (2022-01-22 12:15:49+00:00): Pourquoi avoir supprimé le chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/795405346 ?

Il longe l'Yvette, et a été emprunté par un grand nombre de personnes durant le premier confinement, puisqu'il était pile dans les limites des 2 kilomètres entre Saint Rémy et Chevreuse. Durant la majeure partie de l'année, il est fermé car les terrains traversés sont privés, mais il est souvent accessible au printemps et durant une partie de l'été.

Merci de restaurer ce chemin.
Harvesterify (2022-01-22 12:18:40+00:00): Je me disais aussi : je l'avais enregistré sous forme de trace à cette période : https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Harvesterify/traces/3282891.

En sus, le chemin est clairement visible sur l'imagerie satellite.
cartojo (2022-01-22 18:09:18+00:00): Malheureusement, la situation a changé. Au niveau de St Remy en Chevreuse, il y a un gros portail cadenassé avec un panneau passage interdit. Derrière le portail, le chemin commence à s'embroussailler.  Je pense que maintenir ce sentier sur la carte serait trompeur pour les utilisateurs d'OSM.
Harvesterify (2022-01-22 19:29:18+00:00): Et pourtant c'est bien le comportement attendu, et c'est pour cela que le chemin était taggué "permissive" : le propriétaire du champ traversé ne l'ouvre qu'une partie de l'année.
cartojo (2022-01-22 20:29:57+00:00): Le tag permissive n'est pas adapté pour un chemin avec panneau interdiction de passer et portail fermé ! 
J'ai des gros doutes sur le fait que le chemin redevienne accessible, mais, je vais restaurer le chemin avec un tag acces=no. Je vous laisse aller voir sur le terrain ou chercher les informations pour la période où il serait accessible et ajouter un tag access:conditional donnant l'info de la periode d'ouverture
cartojo (2022-01-22 20:45:47+00:00): En complément VeloDB avait ausii ajouté un fixme il y a 4 mois pour dire que le sentier n'existait plus...
Baloo Uriza (2022-01-18 20:57:09+00:00): Is this a street or is a named driveway?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116200116
dktue (2022-01-16 09:21:48+00:00): Herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Eine Telefonnummer wäre für das Taxiunternehmen noch gut. :-)
ygcgjp5 (2022-01-20 12:33:16+00:00): Kokia čia tų viršūnių reikšmė?
PovilasDew (2022-01-20 17:15:09+00:00): Vartotojas sauls dar 2015 m. pažymėjo šlaitus. Buvau jo klausęs, kodėl klifus/skardžius per visą Kauną pažymėjo, sakė, kad tag'as tinka ir šlaitams, naudojamas Vokietijoje. Šlaitus žymėjo daugmaž per šlaito vidurį, ne visur tiksliai. Sakė, nežinantis koks tag'as galėjęs būti geriau. Aš irgi nerandu geresnio tag'o, nors dabar randu, kad kai kur geriau manmade=enbankment.

 Sugalvojau juos patikslinti.  Nemažą dalį senųjų cliff linijų ištryniau, pakeisdamas naujais, tikslesniais. Juolabiau, tai žymi detalė Kauno mieste - šlaitai.

Esu atviras pasiūlymams ką būtų galima su šiuo žymėjimu daryti. Gal yra geresni tag'ai, gal iš vis nereikalingi (nors sunku pasakyti ar tikrai tokie nereikalingi).
PovilasDew (2022-01-20 17:16:30+00:00): Kas liečia viršūnes mikrorajonuose. Tai visada norėjau pažymėti mikrorajonų kalveles, kurių aukščių skirtumas 5-10 m, turi stačius šlaitus. Jei nepatinka, galite ištrinti, mane tik informuokite.
ygcgjp5 (2022-01-20 19:33:25+00:00): Nieko nežadu keisti, tiesiog buvo pasidarę įdomu :-)
ottwiz (2022-01-15 23:40:08+00:00): Removed ref=* tag more precisely, so i left the ref:penndot=*
vasony (2022-01-23 16:30:36+00:00): Kedves Júlia!

Átnevezték az utcát, kérem ne írja vissza a régi névre.

Tamás
Szüts Júlia (2022-01-23 19:43:51+00:00): Kedves Tamás,
én nem találom az Önkormányzat honlapján csak az előterjesztést, de a döntésről szóló határozatot nem. A Balogh lejtő - Ménesi út sarkán lévő ház falán van egy dr. Balogh Jenő igazságügyi miniszter emléktábla, ő itt lakott, a táblát az Igazságügyi Minisztérium helyezte el 2-3 éve.
üdvözlettel
szj
vasony (2022-01-23 19:56:33+00:00): Kedves Júlia!

1) Az emléktáblát fel lehet venni, egy pontot kell letenni a házra ahol a tábla található, itt a leírás hozzá ha a szerkesztő program nem találná:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:memorial%3Dplaque

2) Amit az utcát illeti:
A főváros hatáskörébe tartoznak az utcanevek, ott lehet megtalálni, itt az összes közgyűlési anyag:
https://einfoszab.budapest.hu/list/fovarosi-kozgyules-nyilvanos-ulesei

A konkrét utca:
1296/2021. (IX. 1.) Főv. Kgy. határozat
https://einfoszab.budapest.hu/list/fovarosi-kozgyules-nyilvanos-ulesei;id=114220;type=3;parentid=12190;parenttype=2


Vagy a teljes jegyzőkönyv:
https://service-einfoszab.budapest.hu/api/dvd/179513

176. oldal

Tamás
Szüts Júlia (2022-01-23 20:03:07+00:00): Köszönöm a tájékoztatást.
riiga (2022-01-16 09:27:58+00:00): Looks fine, but you should connect the tracks to each other and to the roads. I've done that now at your request.
Lucarion (2022-05-25 23:06:19+00:00): Hej Patrick,

Heter "Patrick's backe" verkligen så? Har inte varit på platsen, men hittar inga källor som kan styrka att gångbanan verkligen heter så.
PatrickPAKA (2022-05-26 07:13:26+00:00): Ja självklart heter den det.
Titta på Google Maps så ser du...
Lucarion (2022-05-26 10:51:46+00:00): Hej Patrick,

På Google och Here Maps heter den mycket riktigt "Patrick's backe" respektive "Patricks backe"... men båda karttjänster tillåter användare att föreslå redigeringar. På Lantmäteriets karta och andra kartjänster som inte tillåter användarredigeringar har gångvägen inget namn. Det är samtidigt alltid anmärkningsvärt när vägavsnitt i Sverige har namn med apostrof (') innan genetiv-s, för så skriver vi inte i det svenska språket.
Eiim (2022-01-16 01:05:01+00:00): Bagel & Deli, along with a bunch of other POIs uptown, was added by myself about 4 months ago. MAPS.ME is likely using outdated data. I recommending checking out Organic Maps, an open source and actively developed fork of MAPS.ME which I use.
Syl (2022-01-19 11:32:40+00:00): Bonjour, vu la position des téléphones de chaque côté d'une voie ferrée cela doit être plutôt des téléphones d'urgence. Je viens de corriger.
Kalepom (2022-01-19 17:47:26+00:00): Tu as très bien fait. Merci
mcliquid (2022-12-18 15:21:11+00:00): Das "not:brand" bei der BP schien mir widersprüchlich, ich habe es entfernt.
rjgambrel (2022-01-26 08:58:19+00:00): Before making additional changes to highway classifications in Minnesota please refer to ongoing statewide guidelines being developed at: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Minnesota/Minnesota_highway_classification
mcliquid (2022-12-18 15:22:15+00:00): Auch hier: Bei der Avia das not:brand entfernt, da es ident war mit brand.
mariotomo (2022-01-16 15:54:06+00:00): hi, are you remote mapping, or can you provide local information? thank you for your contributions in both cases!
archpdx (2022-01-16 08:17:45+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for updating this road name. However, please note that we don't abbreviate street names in OpenStreetMap. For example, this street should probably should be named "Southeast 20th Avenue" instead of "SE 20th Ave". You can read more about why we don't use abbreviations here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
Hugoren Martinako (2022-11-18 22:32:05+00:00): Hi there,

Please do not double the nodes place=* for municipalities only to set the role "label" on them. It's not necessary for such elements, and leads to duplicate the tags.

Thanks
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
b-jazz (2022-03-20 17:47:30+00:00): Hi there Capn71,

I just wanted to let you know that golf=hole ways aren't meant to define an area around a fairway, but instead being that straight line (or couple of line segments) that show the approximate path from the tee to the green. I'm making a couple of changes around the first hole and thought you might want to know for future mapping you do. Thanks for the contributions.
Jonathon Of The Creators of all creators! (2022-02-07 15:21:18+00:00): Stop adding unneeded buildings!!!11!1
>:(((
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
Hugoren Martinako (2022-11-18 22:32:10+00:00): Hi there,

Please do not double the nodes place=* for municipalities only to set the role "label" on them. It's not necessary for such elements, and leads to duplicate the tags.

Thanks
SekeRob (2022-01-16 14:27:02+00:00): Hi,

I'm impressed you're able to confirm that e.g. water taps are still there in northern and southern Italy on the same day. Did you actually 'survey' as what the StreetComplete tool is for?

cheers from middle Italy.
Đuro Jiří (2022-01-16 16:32:07+00:00): To je velmi jednoduché. Teď cestuju na kole na jihu Itálie a Grado(GO) pozná,jako svoje vlastní nohy.
Udarian (2022-01-16 05:41:21+00:00): this is the second time that when I commit it cuts off part of my message so here is the rest of the message:

also updated surround roads etc. as a note there were several bus routes that had a motorway link that had to be deleted due to it no longer existing so they have holes inside of them now since I have no clue how to properly map those. someone else will have to fix that. as a note the motorway link had been out of commission for at minimum a year now so those bus roads would have been inaccurate for a while now. I also deleted a peace of railway that is no longer existent since it seams to have been build over.
MxxCon (2022-01-16 07:24:35+00:00): Hello.
Writing location name as a changeset comment doesn't help other mappers understand what you are editing. We can see that this Manhattan, NY by the location of your edits. But explaining what you edited would've been a lot more helpful.
Please see this article for more detailed explanation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116203782
MxxCon (2022-01-16 07:33:37+00:00): Aren't you double-mapping that pedestrian plaza? You mapped it as both, pedestrian area and actual ways.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116204048
kguenther24 (2022-01-16 16:17:41+00:00): I was following suit of other high profile parks/plazas across the country (The Battery, National Mall, large sections of Chicago, etc.) In conversation with other mappers they agree that this is appropriate when both the exact shape of the plaza, as well as best routes (ways) through them, can be useful in higher profile areas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116204048
MxxCon (2022-01-16 16:49:16+00:00): Those mappers are incorrect and what you are doing is tagging for renderer.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Mapping so that it looks pretty on the renderered map rather than having semantically accurate tagging.
kguenther24 (2022-01-16 18:52:58+00:00): Ok, so are you suggesting it all gets removed? From my understanding different routers aren't capable of using pedestrian areas for routing and vice versa. I would argue that this "double-mapping" wasn't done for aesthetics but for better accommodating users of the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116204048
akadouri (2022-01-17 16:34:00+00:00): This discussion bled into the OSMUS Slack.
 https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C4DPLAN3U/p1642373310020500

I'm inclined to say we keep these features and style of mapping due to the additional information each representation captures. In the case of ways for routing/accessibility and the areas for micromapping detail.
jothish_geominds (2022-02-04 08:57:03+00:00): there is no need to create a extra way for adding island tag you can give tag to existing one.. deleting the way you created.
BCNorwich (2022-01-16 08:44:57+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

A couple of things I'd like to point out, the name as spelled was not, I think, intentionally derogative in any way. It was actually misspelled, the correct spelling was "Scumptious", this word is in the dictionaries and is not an offensive word by English standards.

Secondly, it's wrong to delete something just because you presume it to be offensive. Also if it was ascertained as offensive one would only remove the offensive section (word). Further, it's not OSM policy to remove the building outline or address in such circumstances.

Thus I've reverted the deletion, and corrected the name. I did look up the cafe and found that it was closed in 2018, so I've now tagged the amenity and name as disused as per OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.

PS My comments are as a fairly local person, your locale is Australia, I wonder, is the word Scumchus a derogatory term over there?
Christurton8 (2022-01-16 21:39:07+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Firstly - Thank you for amending. It is appreciated.

Two points - Scumchus is offensive as is a not Scrumptious Tearooms as the business was originally called - the key offence word being ‘scum’ - putting chus on the end prevents the word being flagged directly by any filters openstreetmap may have - I trust you acknowledge why ‘scum’ would be offensive. 'Chus' is a company of singers.. therefore ScumChus can be translated to 'singing scum'

Secondly - it was my wife’s award winning business as we originate from Great Dunmow but it was targeted for its success by a few local people whose businesses did not stand up to ours, they used the term scum on other review platforms. We did however had a huge cyclist patronage and the word as written appears on Strava.

Again thank you for correcting and trust you understand our point of view.

Regards

Chris & Jane Turton
gscscnd (2022-01-16 09:20:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116206723
Lyon-St-Clair (2022-02-08 18:00:07+00:00): How do you manage to make so much errors about the pitlane with all of the TV coverage ??
BCNorwich (2022-01-16 09:27:46+00:00): Hi, You're making a lot of problems with these paths you are adding. A lot of sections of your paths are placed on top of existing highways making duplications that disrupt routing.
In many places you've joined paths to waterways and other features. Sometimes crossing waterways, sometimes running on top of waterways.

Please see here:- https://tinyurl.com/2sxvpvaf   these are the highway duplications, there are many more problems. Could you please remove or correct your mapping? If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2022-01-22 09:42:31+00:00): Hi, No response so I've removed the duplicate ways.
user_5359 (2022-01-16 08:06:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the school please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
hatul (2022-01-16 16:51:32+00:00): A barrier should be on the way.
Yitzchak M (2022-01-16 16:55:28+00:00): On IHM, there is a barrier!
hatul (2022-01-16 17:01:31+00:00): create new on the way
hatul (2022-01-16 17:03:05+00:00): you moved the way 😁
Yitzchak M (2022-01-16 17:14:33+00:00): On the trail itself, there is no barrier. I was there recently and I have pictures. The barrier is located exactly where I put it. Between the two trails! I am NOT changing anything!
Yitzchak M (2022-01-16 17:54:05+00:00): OK. I see that you went ahead and made the changes that you wanted. You removed the tag of attraction. I could have compromised on that. You removed the gate from where there actually is one. That is wrong. And you extended the Shvil Sharon beyond where the actual markers begin, which is why I moved the route. I would like to know. Who are you? That you feel free to make changes without actual proof that you are right? I have pictures. Do you?
hatul (2022-01-16 19:10:08+00:00): אז אני לא מבין מה הטעם במחסום שלא על שביל. אבל אתה כמובן יכול להחזיר אותו.
Yitzchak M (2022-01-16 19:35:02+00:00): הכוונה הייתה שאי אפשר ללכת ישר אחרי הגשר על שביל השרון. חייב לפנות ימינה, ללכת 10 מטר, ואז שמלה על השביל שרון. אבל אם לא משנה, אז הכל טוב.
abakus_uploader (2022-01-16 23:31:15+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ChehrehBargi (2022-07-31 16:27:34+00:00): سلام
انتهای کوچه پهلوان موسوی (اتحاد) ماشین رو هست.
JeroenHoek (2022-01-16 10:18:57+00:00): Voor zo'n kort stukje is het niet handig (of nodig) om de rijbanen samen te voegen. Er kruist daar niets, keren is sowieso verboden, en het maakt het toevoegen van lanes en turn:lanes lastiger.

Om de routing nu correct te maken moet je ook nog eens twee turn-restrictions toevoegen (die ontbreken nu), want het is een doorgetrokken streep.

De regel dat je rijstroken samenvoegt als er geen fysieke barrière tussen ligt is niet absoluut. Dat is vooral nuttig bij lange afstanden zoals een autoweg. Bij dit soort stukjes zitten er geen voordelen aan.
JeroenHoek (2022-01-16 10:23:44+00:00): Daar verderop waar de weg de woonwijk ingaat is het prima natuurlijk.
JeroenHoek (2022-01-16 10:30:09+00:00): Kijk, zo kom je uit met turn:lanes erbij: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116208324
JeroenHoek (2022-01-16 10:37:09+00:00): Goed gezien dat die maxwidth maxlength moest zijn trouwens.
Geim (2022-01-16 13:13:00+00:00): "De regel dat je rijstroken samenvoegt als er geen fysieke barrière tussen ligt is niet absoluut."
Ben ik het helemaal maar eens, maar gezien de discussie die er op het forum heerst v.w.b. turborotondes, werd deze regel wel als absoluut gezien.
JeroenHoek (2022-01-16 14:29:46+00:00): Ja die indruk heb ik ook. Ik vermoed dat dit een richtlijn is die in de begintijd van OSM steeds meer als regel gezien werd.

Als richtlijn is hij prima (dat stuk hierboven is zinloos om als twee rijbanen in te tekenen), maar toepassen puur om het toepassen voelt wat doelloos. Vreemde note trouwens voor zo'n specifiek stukje.
E de Wit (2022-01-16 17:31:19+00:00): maxwidth heb ik (blijkbaar) vaker onterecht gebruikt. Echt geen flauw idee waarom.
De foute maxwidth=* heb ik nu allemaal gecorrigeerd.

Ik deel trouwens de mening om deze regel voor het splitsen / samenvoegen van wegen niet als absoluut te zien.
JeroenHoek (2022-01-16 18:08:14+00:00): > Echt geen flauw idee waarom.

Misschien door het bord? Het is een liggende ↔ met '* m' er boven immers.
Geim (2022-01-16 18:59:12+00:00): Kwam vaak voor, in heel NL een stuk of 50 gevonden.
dcapillae (2022-01-16 11:20:17+00:00): Hi, BubbleGuppies.

This changeset was reverted. The streets with names shouldn't be tagged with  "noname=yes". The way in a square with name are tagged "noname=yes" according to the local community guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas_en_Espa%C3%B1a#Plazas_peatonales

Thanks for your collaboration.

Regards,

Daniel
BubbleGuppies (2022-03-09 16:55:07+00:00): Understood, thank you
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-02-04 04:49:40+00:00): تم التصحيح
GUFSZ (2025-01-03 16:25:10+00:00): Was ist aus diesem Verkehrsversuch geworden? Bzw. woran erkennt man, dass dieser Verkehrsversuch noch stattfindet?
coureur (2025-01-05 08:48:26+00:00): So weit ich weiß ist die Evaluierung positiv ausgefallen. Bin leider nicht mehr vor Ort. Die Stadt Neu-Isenburg hat dazu am 24.11.2024 folgendes veröffentlicht:

"Nachdem die Evaluierung des Verkehrsversuchs von Hessen Mobil zwischen Offenbach und Neu-Isenburg positiv ausgefallen ist, steht fest, dass dieser Abschnitt beibehalten wird. Da in diesem Jahr bereits der südliche Abschnitt zwischen Neuhöfer Straße und Dreieich fertiggestellt wurde, gilt es nun, die verbleibende Lücke zwischen Gravenbruchring und Neuhöfer Straße zu schließen."

https://www.neu-isenburg.de/pressemodul/pressemitteilungen/november/entwurfsplanung-fuer-radweg-gravenbruchring-neuhoefer-strasse-vorgelegt
Larmax (2022-01-16 09:27:06+00:00): Moi, highway=living street on tarkoitettu vain pihakaduille, jotka merkataan aina tällaisilla kyilteillä:  https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6f/Finland_road_sign_573.svg
archpdx (2022-01-17 07:12:22+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for updating Bend Senior Center! I think it's best to leave it as one building with nodes for the gym and swimming pool as these aren't physically different buildings. Besides, leisure=swimming_pool is meant to only be for the water area and not as an outline for the facility (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool).
trigpoint (2022-01-16 14:22:26+00:00): Why have you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/718122173 to unclassified?

In real terms I would describe it as a track, but in OSM terms it is service with restricted access for motor vehicles.

Cheers Phil
eggie (2022-01-16 09:51:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2022-01-16 13:21:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! May I ask what you were trying to do? Currently three relations of borders are not closed
Syl (2022-01-16 09:51:18+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de modifier le type du lieu-dit Kernon, isolated_dwelling semble plus adapté.
MacDony (2022-01-16 10:10:22+00:00): Bonjour,
Pas de soucis, bonne journée ;)
Denis
trigpoint (2022-01-16 11:40:22+00:00): Unclassified implies public access for motor vehicles, which these are not. They were correctly mapped as service.

What is the source of the name as there are no signs?

Cheers Phil
DD1GJ (2022-01-23 01:36:33+00:00): revert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116474657
Supaplex (2022-01-19 11:36:53+00:00): 一般縣市填addr:city, 縣下管的鄉鎮市加在adde:district 欄位
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116207433