piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
slash1111 (2023-07-06 17:24:14+00:00): Ahoj Dodko, mozno som to zle pochopil, sice som tam dal access=no, ale zaroven som tam dal bicycle=designated,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle=designated?uselang=en
Takze v navigacii pre pesich to nenaviguje na tuto cyklotrasu, iba pri navigacii pre cyklo. Ale ak to ma byt nastavene inak, tak to kludne oprav. Dakujem.
kawino85 (2021-11-18 18:42:15+00:00): Which goods are produced here justifying the "industrial" tag?
James Derrick (2021-11-18 19:45:41+00:00): Hi,

Clean water.

After working as a chartered engineer for a large water company, the process of processing of raw sewage is most definitely industrial. Lift pumps are 2m tall. Screens use chain conveyors to remove detritus up 5m inclines. The whole process is packaged chemical engineering - very much industrial.
And more to the point, I've stood outside the gates of _this_ very plant and listened to the sound of all the automated industrial processes.
Happy Mapping,

James
SK53 (2021-11-19 12:51:26+00:00): Hi kawino85,

Sewage works have more or less been tagged with industrial from when I started with OSM in 2009. If redundant substantial remediation is required before using for other purposes (another quite good indication of industrial processes).

Jerry
kawino85 (2021-11-20 13:11:42+00:00): "The whole process is packaged chemical engineering - very much industrial."
Something is industrial when goods are produced or processed. Utilities are NOT falling under this according to the UK Standard Industrial Classification of Economic Activities.
SK53 (2021-11-20 14:22:39+00:00): @kawino85: This is OpenStreetMap not OpenUKSISCA, so our meaning of industrial will not necessarily accord with it's usage elsewhere. You can tag the industrial sector (it's a separate tag, but an international classification is recommended, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aindustry%3Aisic_code). Equally there is a utility=* tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:utility), but both are used to supplement the existing tags.
James Derrick (2021-11-21 10:44:29+00:00): @kawino85: In the OpenStreetMap community our tagging preferences are flexible, and deliberately NOT set in stone. Often, the best way to understand how to tag a feature is to see how others in the community have modelled similar situations.
                                                                                                                           
I've been contributing to OSM since 2007 so am still learning, so find tools like taginfo useful to look for examples e.g.:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/man_made=wastewater_plant#combinations
                                                                                                                                    The variation in OSM feature tagging may create complexity for data consumers, however the same variation adds richness and detail to our project. Indeed, this is the same reason why "mechanical editing" is discouraged - running what looks like a simple SQL update may erase "ground truth".
                                                                                                                                    Adding tags is usually better than deleting those added by others - e.g. adding utility=sewerage, even a industry:type=* may be useful even if a data consumer may infer from man_made=wastewater_plant.
                                                                                                                                    In addition, "ground truth" is important here as although this facility is a Waste Water Treatment Works (WWTW), the name=* reflects the sign at the gate - which suggests man_made=pumping_station.
Happy Mapping,

James
nmombo12 (2022-01-03 15:15:05+00:00): Hello! The description key should not be used for advertising. It is encouraged to add your business to OSM, but the description should be limited to information that can aid other mappers or provide detail to an end user. Here is the wiki for the description key. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
Similarly, the image key should be used for images of the POI, not for the logo of the business operating the POI.
Thanks!

Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115716221
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113943384
totera (2021-11-18 18:22:10+00:00): There is nothing here, the pharmacy is already mapped in its right place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7387359839
user_8655426 (2021-12-01 11:12:53+00:00): こんばんは。静岡県の編集、ありがとうございます。
この変更セットで建設中の道路を追加されていますが、背景として使用された画像には建設中と思われる道路が写っていません。
https://osmcha.org/changesets/113943605/ (mapbox)
また、全国各地の建設中・計画上の道路も多数編集されていますが、このセットのものと同様、航空画像で確認できないものが多いです。
これらの道路のマッピングで、OSMの情報源として不適切なデータを利用した可能性があります。

・利用可能なデータソース
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/764

1. この変更セットでの建設中道路の「情報源(source)」
2. 全国各地の建設中・計画中道路の「情報収集方法」を教えて下さい。よろしくお願いします。

それから、別の変更セットに関することですが、以下のページもお読みいただくようお願いします。

・JA:変更セットの良いコメント
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:変更セットの良いコメント

・グッドプラクティス： 現存しないオブジェクトをマッピングしないでください。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:グッドプラクティス

・JA:Tag:railway=abandoned
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:railway%3Dabandoned

・安楽椅子マッピングのガイドライン
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:安楽椅子マッピング
user_10650376 (2021-12-01 16:24:40+00:00): 鉄道関連投稿はすべて1970年代の国土地理院の航空写真をもとに正確に作られているため問題ないと考えます。ただ、札沼線の一部区間では農地に払い下げられている部分があるためそこをどうすればいいかご教授ください。
藤枝バイパスについては四車線化時の準備構造が明確であり、また発注や着工されているため航空写真をもとに記入しました。
島田金谷バイパスも同様であり、またmaxarの航空写真なら工事現場が確認できます。個人的には用地買収や重機が入っていることが確認できた時点で建設中の道路が確認できたと考えております。（道路の概形が把握可能なため）
user_10650376 (2021-12-01 16:38:05+00:00): また国土交通省の新規事業採択時評価に付属の地図は国土数値情報ではなく国土地理院の情報であるため、また公的機関から公表されている図面は使用してもよいと判断していましたが誤りでしたらご指摘ください。
また、安来道路、広呉道はいまだ着工されていないようですので準備構造があるにせよproposedに変更したほうが良いでしょうか。
user_8655426 (2021-12-02 09:22:30+00:00): 返信、ありがとうございます。

・データの情報源 「ウェブ上で見つかるほとんどのデータには著作権があります。 絶対に著作権があるリソースを使わないでください。」
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Beginners_Guide_1.1

・JA:著作権「確証がないなら、使わないでください。 」
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:著作権

・JA:Legal FAQ (2. 協力)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Legal_FAQ

・CC BY 4.0データの利用申請テンプレートについて
https://openstreetmap.jp/node/825

・JA:データ収集手法を選ぶ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:データ収集手法を選ぶ

この変更セットは購読停止にしました。返信しないでください。
不正に取得してOSMに入力したデータや、現存しない地物(現地で確認できないオブジェクト)のデータをどうすべきかは、メーリングリスト(Talk-ja)で質問してください。ここでの議論で済む問題ではないと思います。
また、私は法律の専門家ではありませんので、著作権に関する質問も Talk-ja へ投稿をお願いします。
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
marczoutendijk (2021-11-25 13:49:47+00:00): Please use proper changeset comments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2021-11-25 13:49:53+00:00): Please use proper changeset comments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-11-18 14:28:45+00:00): Danke! :-)
SekeRob (2021-11-18 13:05:22+00:00): Confirmed to have resolved the rendering of trees through inner areas of grassland, scrub and bare rock.
MiroJanosik (2021-12-10 05:48:43+00:00): Hi, those garages had geometry exactly as they are (line of garages, and at the end some of them tilted). Though, it was incorrect they were all drawn in single line.
kartonage (2021-12-10 08:00:22+00:00): Hej,

yes that is correct. The geometries were only slightly changed. But the objects were self-intersecting so renderers were omitting part of the buildings. Self-intersecting objects usually will not work as intended.

Best regards
marczoutendijk (2021-11-25 13:50:01+00:00): Please use proper changeset comments:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
黄庭坚 (2021-12-12 01:32:53+00:00): duplicate to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8779542
tvitali (2021-11-19 08:40:31+00:00): Привет! Ты зачем забор сделал вдоль дороги у дома 78 ул. Мира? нет там его!
serega1103 (2021-11-19 16:44:58+00:00): Да, спасибо, подправил. Руки обмораживаются когда на планшете рисуешь, и схематичные наброски вовсе в каракули превращаются и не разобрать потом. Сегодня сходил опять, что успел срисовал на планшет, пока руки опять не отмёрзли.
baumann3141 (2021-11-19 02:06:21+00:00): Why did you delete these? These are absolutely features that should be on the map. Please correct and reverse your edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113944782
Dodko (2021-11-18 14:21:17+00:00): Opravil som adresu, ľavá budova na ubytovanie je 47 a pridal severnú budovu 49.
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/c/5w7mV
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-09-21 07:29:51+00:00): Is it deliberate that you put here
name:absent=yes
rather than
noname=yes
?

Have you intended meaning different than one carried by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:noname%3Dyes ?
kruemelhuepfer (2024-09-21 14:58:55+00:00): Feel free to adjust it.
Vinber (2021-11-20 15:46:45+00:00): Bonjour,
l'amplitude de votre modification englobe un bout des états unis, l'ocean atlantique, l'afrique de l'ouest, le portugal, ...
beaucoup trop grand vu le commentaire  (sans doute que ceci https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1003992072/history est éloigné de votre maison non hihihi !).
Pour rappel https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/bonnes-pratiques-osm-en-snt

Félicitation pour le nom du compte, permettant de comprendre que c'est une classe de seconde, n'hésitez pas à ajouter sur votre profil le nom du lycée.

Bonne cartographie
snoozingnewt (2021-11-29 01:12:00+00:00): Hi, can you please explain this tag that you used in this changeset?

common_good=yes
SK53 (2021-11-29 10:24:48+00:00): Common good is a specific Scottish legal term (http://www.andywightman.com/common-good) meaning the land is owned by the community; in practice the relevant local authority. I'm sure this is what Central America means. It may be possible to use the designation key (designation=common_good). There is a long history of misappropriation of common good land by others (see more detailed paper http://www.andywightman.com/docs/commongood_v3.pdf or "The Poor had no Lawyers" also by Wightman.
Central America (2021-11-29 15:07:34+00:00): Yes the term landuse=common has been downgraded but common_good land is still an important issue. Is the designation key in further use? And shuld i put infirmation in the wiki?
SK53 (2021-11-29 16:44:46+00:00): Commons ceased to be rendered which led to some (possibly inappropriate) re-tagging in England. The tag is undoubtedly slightly problematic (too many meanings) but not totally useless. I think in E&W commons & village greens can be explicitly mapped using the designation tag because there are legal lists (e.g., https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68709230). I think there was a discussion on talk-gb about that time. I see no reason why the same couldn't be true in Scotland.

BTW, nice to see you mapping again Bob!
fghj753 (2021-11-18 16:28:42+00:00): Correction: Mixed up east and west: this changeset applies to NE/SE, not west
Glassman (2021-11-18 17:55:38+00:00): You extended Widberry Lane. Country records indicate that the road ends where it did before you extended it. Can you verify your extension? Should it be a driveway instead?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113945752
flaviusm_telenav (2021-11-19 05:19:29+00:00): hello, i made the changes and i split the road and i extended it to the houses with tag driveway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113945752
gscscnd (2021-11-18 20:04:34+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/863352603
irik (2021-11-18 20:39:07+00:00): kurde przypał, zmieniłem na poprzednią wersję, więcej nie będę uaktualniał znaczników zgodnie z sugestiami edytora xD
gscscnd (2021-11-18 20:46:29+00:00): Nie wszystkie sugestie iD są powszechnie zaakceptowane, o tagowanie „wody” były długie awantury m.in. na liście Tagging. Ale chyba przegrywamy: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/waterway=riverbank#chronology
irik (2021-11-18 21:00:33+00:00): no na to wygląda, rzuciłem okiem jak te poldery u Czechów wyglądają i 2/2 są zgodnie z sugestią iD
Viki_travel_weak (2021-11-18 14:16:09+00:00): UPD comment: Improved road geometry based on Esri (Clarity) imagery and TIGER roads #mbx_missingstr_usa
pitfire (2021-11-19 06:32:16+00:00): Hallo Graf Protz,
das Gebäude ist nicht Garage.
Siehe POI "Knoten: Spitzwegstraße (1469961425)" minor_substation 	small_building.
eggie (2021-11-18 15:39:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback...  Alleen een naam doet niets in OSM Ook de aard van het bedrijf zul je 'moeten' toevoegen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-18 15:48:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Drepair
shop=repair
repair=mobile_phone

of kijk anders even hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Delectronics_repair
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-11-18 16:18:52+00:00): shoptag toegevoegd
kawino85 (2021-11-18 15:44:50+00:00): Did these vacant buildings historically have had house numbers?
b-unicycling (2021-11-18 16:40:51+00:00): I don't know, I haven't surveyed them in the past. There are no house numbers visible from the street anyway.
eggie (2021-11-18 16:04:09+00:00): Dag Thies... Je vraagt feedback.
Eigenlijk is de combinatie access=no (Verboden Toegang) en foot=yes bijna altijd fout.
Beter dus access=no verwijderen.
Wanneer er geen tweewielers mogen komen tag je vehicle=no bij.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-18 16:14:24+00:00): access = no verwijderd

Kijk zelf even of vehicle=no van toepassing is.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-11-19 08:44:19+00:00): Wellicht heb je voor de juiste ligging wat aan de hoogtekaart. Even scrollen naar Nuland.. 
Ik heb het pad iets aangepast
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/NLOSMOK/OSMOKNL/OSMOKNL.html#map=19.58/51.7316/5.4343/0
eggie (2021-11-18 15:43:36+00:00): Dag EVvS

Je zult ook de aard van de eetgelegenheid moeten toevoegen. bv amenity=fast_food
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfast_food

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-11-18 15:44:55+00:00): Kijk even bij Snackbar Geesterduin hoe dat is gedaan.
Eggie
eggie (2021-11-18 16:24:20+00:00): fast_food en website  toegevoegd
mueschel (2021-11-21 17:30:38+00:00): Hi,
"website:related_law" is not used in other places up to now.
I suggest to use "related_law:url" instead:

Links giving further information (which are not the webpage of the object) are typically tagged "url", like in opening_hours:url.

What do you think?
mweper (2021-11-21 18:02:52+00:00): Hi. Good advice, I didn't know that regulation with "URL". I will change it when I free up a bit. I should even correct also several POIs with similar label and meaning, but that I don't remember where they are.
VictorIE (2021-11-19 06:28:47+00:00): Hi,this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286986517 shouldn't be tagged highway=residential or be connected to other roads. The changes should probably be undone.
jnighan (2021-11-18 23:18:45+00:00): Hi, David. You have deleted the correct names of the Kongscut properties and town open spaces. "Kongscut Land Trust" and "Town Land" are incorrect values for the "name=" tag. Kongscut Land Trust is the operator, not the name. "Town Land" is a description, not a name, and is better indicated using "operator=Town of Glastonbury." I am restoring the correct names; see my sources below. 

The property boundaries come directly from the Town's GIS data, made available by the state (see source below). I have imported these property boundaries directly, so they were already as correct as possible. I am restoring them to their previous positions.

Also, please do not delete "natural=wood" when it is in fact true.

Also, "Baldwin Beverly Fox Restated Trust" is the name of the property owner, not the name of the parcel. Is this property in fact a nature reserve? Is it open to the public for hiking? I currently see no indication of this.

I'm glad to see people active on OSM in Glastonbury; please do not take my edits as antagonistic. 

Kongscut Land Trust: http://www.kongscutlandtrust.org/index.php?p=29

Town of Glastonbury Open Space Map (click Zoning / Regulatory Layers and then Open Space Parcels to see the names of town open spaces): https://gise3.glastonbury-ct.gov/Html5/index.html

Connecticut Property Lines: https://cteco.uconn.edu/ctmaps/rest/services/Open_Space/Parcels_for_Open_Space_Mapping/MapServer
ovruni (2021-11-18 22:44:44+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se menciona "corrección de calles", sin embargo también ha consistido eliminación de otros objetos sin motivo aparente, por lo que he recuperado estos objetos. En caso de eliminar objetos por favor indicar los motivos en el conjunto de cambios.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
eggie (2021-11-18 16:10:25+00:00): Oke.. een highway=path
Wanneer je er alleen mag wandelen dan vehicle=no toevoegen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-18 17:52:44+00:00): Best lastig allemaal..
Lees hier wanneer service=emergency te gebruiken.
Dat is de specificatie van een highway=service en dat is hier niet het geval.
Dus allen gebruiken in die combinatie.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Demergency_access

Wel staat ergens dat je emergency=designated kunt toevoegen.
Eggie
*abq* (2022-02-05 14:23:02+00:00): Hi Opix,
bitte an Objekte wie Sitzbänke kein name=sitzbank
VG Reiner
eggie (2021-11-18 16:41:26+00:00): Dag Shaya  Lijkt me correct zo.
Gr eggie
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-11-18 16:06:48+00:00): Hallo Lohmy,

willkommen bei OSM! :-)

Bitte gebe bei Deinen Änderungen aussagekräftige Kommentare an. "is so" sagt nicht viel aus. ;-) Und gib die Quelle für Deine Änderungen an. Beim online Editor iD muss man dafür das Feld "Quellen" beim Hochladen hinzufügen.

Siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Gruß Roger Wilco
Sandal man (2021-11-18 23:16:37+00:00): Again no tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004034323#map=16/37.3420/-6.0034
Please repair
ScottWalkerAU (2021-11-19 03:24:32+00:00): The boundary you traced was from aerials taken just after a flood period. Given this stretch of land is part of the Maitland Flood Mitigation Scheme, it seems like a rather arbitrary polygon?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113950525
mavl (2021-11-19 03:21:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113970568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5457].
DressyPear4 (2021-11-18 17:28:27+00:00): Não adicione o que não existe, essa edição foi revertida.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113951106
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:46:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
mavl (2021-11-19 03:20:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113970568 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5457].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-27 22:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114291939 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting a series of mass deletions in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5477 .
Frans S (2021-12-13 10:59:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113951270
Intrinsical (2021-11-18 19:07:08+00:00): description of changes should be more thorough
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113951305
NorthwestPAmapper (2021-11-19 17:33:37+00:00): Okay, basically I added a bikeway that was put in sometime in either 2019 or 2020.
fghj753 (2021-11-18 16:29:27+00:00): Correction: Mixed up east and west: this changeset applies to SW, not east.
lyctkel (2023-08-31 09:14:30+00:00): Hi Daveileci,
at node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9264357483 you have used recycling:PMD.
In the meantime, the spelling with lowercase letters has become established (see also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Arecycling%3Apmd).
Do you mean the described recycling:pmd and can I change the notation?
Regards,
lyctkel
Davileci (2023-08-31 10:01:13+00:00): Dear lyctkel,
Yes, I meant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Cómo_mapear_un#Contenedor_de_reciclaje_de_envases and you can change the notation.
Thank you so much!
lyctkel (2023-08-31 12:07:16+00:00): Thanks,
it corrected.
zbrown4 (2021-11-19 21:51:04+00:00): Hey torkteam23! Thanks for contributing! Just a quick tip when adding footways - when the footpath naturally connects to a road, it is usually best to connect the path to a node on the road. This helps with routing and ensures that the footpaths don't end up as a 'routing island' (i.e. they don't connect to anything else). For example, in this changeset, I would connect the north paths to the turning circle nodes of 72nd Ave and Deerwood Ln, connect the east path to the curve between Deerwood Ln and 70th Place, and finally connect the west path to the service road in the parking lot.

Thanks again for your contributions! It is nice to have another active mapper working on the Maple Grove area :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113951843
DeKaN (2021-11-18 17:53:19+00:00): Просьба, не создавайте бесмысленных ограничений, вида "нельзя повернуть на односторонку против движения". они подразумеваются
cquest (2022-01-17 18:14:14+00:00): Bonjour,

La D1118 a été modifiée en D168 par ce changeset.

Quelle est la source pour ce changement de numéro ? Le département de l'Aude me signale un erreur et qu'il s'agit de la D1118.

Sans retour rapide, je remettrai D1118 (cohérence aussi avec la BDTopo de décembre).
Bernard59118 (2022-01-18 10:34:47+00:00): Bonjour,
Désolé pour l'erreur (rectifiée)
muralito (2022-01-06 18:41:59+00:00): Not sure were the error comes from , but this is the reservoir Embalse de Salto Grande, and should not be deleted.
Is is from the Salto Grande  hidroelectric dam to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556476258 (the largest reservoir that can be made without involving Brazil in the project)
muralito (2022-01-06 18:44:16+00:00): Also in the version 7 of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7646101/ was a member with role "water_storage"
VLD083 (2022-01-12 16:51:57+00:00): Apologies I believe I removed it accidentally.