piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Richard (2021-09-15 13:45:13+00:00): Where someone with just 86 edits decides that they know better than 10+ years of the settled community will, and decides to break numerous downstream apps without consultation, that is vandalism pure and simple.

There are numerous countries that use highway=trunk in a similar way to the UK, and frankly I have already wasted enough of my day on this ****.
Barry86m (2021-09-15 14:03:53+00:00): Which countries use highway=trunk in a similar way to UK OSM? There are quite a lot of roads tagged as 'trunk' that are single lane, single carriageways, with 30mph limits and multiple roundabout - which is clearly not what the global OSM 'trunk' tag is designed to be used for.
Richard (2021-09-15 14:22:36+00:00): It has literally taken me less than a minute to find a stretch of single-carriageway highway=trunk with a 40km/h limit, and three roundabouts a few hundred metres from each other, in a mainland European country.

Maybe it might behove you to learn a bit more about OSM, perhaps do a few more edits than just 86, before lecturing others on how OSM "clearly" works. I'm (I think) the third or fourth longest-standing active participant in OSM and even I wouldn't steam into a country and start reclassifying their roads willy-nilly.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-09-15 14:51:10+00:00): I want to repeat that large scale reclassifying of roads is one of the worst ways to start OSM editing.

It is tricky, involves many editors, road classification in an incosistent mess (mostly due to fact that real world road classification is messy in many ways). And here consistency is especially nice.

> here are quite a lot of roads tagged as 'trunk' that are single lane, single carriageways, with 30mph limits and multiple roundabout 

So?

highway=trunk can be even unpaved road - it is not based on physical characteristic

> I wouldn't steam into a country and start reclassifying their roads willy-nilly.

I wouldn't do even in area where I am highly active editor
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse (2021-11-11 23:01:13+00:00): See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110097966 .I've deleted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113672192 . Please do not add fictional data to OpenStreetMap.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
ovruni (2021-09-07 22:41:54+00:00): Hola, he notado que en los últimos días diferentes cuentas han realizado por la zona ediciones similares a la suya donde se han agregado nombres ficticios. Lo que sugiere que existe en curso un conjunto de ediciones organizadas sin seguir las directrices de edición organizada. [0] Este tema ha sido comunicado en la lista de correos de la comunidad. [1] Por favor comunique a la persona u organización encargada para que se ponga en contacto mediante el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2021-September/000893.html
ovruni (2021-09-07 22:47:56+00:00): Hola, he notado que en los últimos días diferentes cuentas han realizado por la zona ediciones similares a la suya donde se han agregado nombres ficticios en edificios. Lo que sugiere que existe en curso un conjunto de ediciones organizadas sin seguir las directrices de edición organizada. [0] Este tema ha sido comunicado en la lista de correos de la comunidad. [1] Por favor comunique a la persona u organización encargada para que se ponga en contacto mediante el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2021-September/000893.html
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
ovruni (2021-09-07 22:50:29+00:00): Hola, a pesar del mensaje que le había dejado ha continuado agregando nombres ficticios en edificaciones. Procedo a revertir este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
ovruni (2021-09-07 23:07:43+00:00): Hola, he notado que en los últimos días diferentes cuentas han realizado por la zona ediciones similares a la suya donde se han agregado nombres ficticios en edificios. Lo que sugiere que existe en curso un conjunto de ediciones organizadas sin seguir las directrices de edición organizada. [0] Este tema ha sido comunicado en la lista de correos de la comunidad. [1] Por favor comunique a la persona u organización encargada para que se ponga en contacto mediante el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2021-September/000893.html
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
maraf24 (2023-02-26 16:15:54+00:00): Niestety, ale to położenie jest błędne.
Przywróciłem stare.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
ottwiz (2021-09-11 19:54:09+00:00): Btw, if you survey the area, you should use your phone with StreetComplete and add addresses, this is a very good idea, so you can add lot of addresses that are missing. :)
ovruni (2021-09-07 23:16:41+00:00): Hola Noemi Condori, he notado que en los últimos días diferentes cuentas han realizado por la zona ediciones similares a la suya donde se han agregado nombres ficticios en edificios. Lo que sugiere que existe en curso un conjunto de ediciones organizadas sin seguir las directrices de edición organizada. [0] Este tema ha sido comunicado en la lista de correos de la comunidad. [1] Por favor comunique a la persona u organización encargada para que se ponga en contacto mediante el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2021-September/000893.html
PrimaryColours (2022-01-30 20:48:10+00:00): The dam access tunnel does not end in or below Colrodo River. It ends at the right hand size of glen canyon power plant (node 4194439172). See https://www.usbr.gov/uc/rm/crsp/gc/
Tunnel entrance with red light.
bryceco (2022-01-31 19:07:24+00:00): Yes I agree with you. I was going off the horribly aligned Bing imagery and trying to route it to the parking lot down there. Should it connect to the node you mention or end right next to it?
PrimaryColours (2022-01-31 21:48:42+00:00): I would not connect it to the mentioned Node. It should end a bit more south. In fact the tunnel entrance is underneath Glen Canyon Dam Bridge.  See https://images.fineartamerica.com/images/artworkimages/mediumlarge/1/glen-canyon-dam-ricky-barnard.jpg or Google Earth imagery from 5/1/2002.
bryceco (2022-02-01 07:55:58+00:00): That’s great information. Looking at the Apple Maps 3-D flyover view makes it all very obvious, pretty much what I thought it was like originally. Everything around there is somewhat misaligned with the MapBox imagery, I’ll try to fix it up as best I can to make it consistent.

I notice you haven’t made any edits yourself, feel free to jump in since it seems you have local knowledge.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
Mashin (2021-09-08 03:50:56+00:00): You are doing a great job!

If you want to make your life easier try editing with JOSM. It is not as easy to learn as iD, but has tons of useful functions and plugins and is way faster.

Particularly useful for landuse/landcover are:
* Improve way accuracy (for improving existing shapes) 
* fastDraw (for quick drawing of curved shapes)
* Merge Contour 
* Balloon (Shrinkwrap) for fast fill of areas
Jmapper007 (2021-09-09 19:51:52+00:00): Okay, thank you!
ovruni (2021-09-07 23:28:13+00:00): Hola thaneo, he notado que en los últimos días diferentes cuentas han realizado por la zona ediciones similares a la suya donde se han agregado nombres ficticios en edificios. Lo que sugiere que existe en curso un conjunto de ediciones organizadas sin seguir las directrices de edición organizada. [0] Este tema ha sido comunicado en la lista de correos de la comunidad. [1] Por favor comunique a la persona u organización encargada para que se ponga en contacto mediante el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2021-September/000893.html
ovruni (2021-09-07 23:35:13+00:00): Hola Luizma9292. Veo que en este conjunto de cambios nuevamente se han agregado nombres ficticios en edificios. Procedo a revertir este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
ovruni (2021-09-07 23:44:16+00:00): Hola steban18. He notado que desde esta cuenta se suele editar cada vez que aparecen ediciones organizas por esta zona, lo que sugiere que podría ser la cuenta que organiza estas ediciones sin seguir las directrices de ediciones organizadas. Por lo que lo he mencionado en la lista de correos de la comunidad. Por favor comuniquese por ese medio o por el grupo de telegram https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
[0] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2021-September/000894.html
ovruni (2021-09-07 23:50:32+00:00): Además le indico que he revertido este conjunto de cambios donde se agregan nombres ficticios en edificios, la etiqueta nombre esta destinada solamente para objetos que tengan un nombre en particular. [0] No son para añadir descripciones ni direcciones, para eso existen etiqueta de tipo "addr:full" o "description".
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
ovruni (2021-09-08 05:18:50+00:00): Hola nhylton hidalgo, actualmente ya existe la vía 277735944 [0] con la etiqueta man_made=pier, por otra parte las etiquetas wikidata y wikipedia deben de referirse al objeto en cuestión, que en caso existiese sería sobre el muelle, no sobre la ciudad.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277735944
mariotomo (2022-04-29 16:36:28+00:00): hi. I was reviewing the osmose reports for Panama, and I noticed a whole series of "Same wikipedia topic on other language". OSMCha also warns about "Deleted a wikidata/wikipedia tag" and "Invalid tag modification".
hopefully you have time to review your work even if it's 8 months later.
Mashin (2022-04-29 17:44:06+00:00): Removed a wikipedia tag. Maybe that was it.
mariotomo (2022-04-29 18:40:43+00:00): possibly, I don't check osmose every week, and its refresh cycle is also rather slow.  thank you for the fix!
frydzio (2021-09-10 10:26:15+00:00): Drobna uwaga - nie rysujmy wszystkiego jak leci z podkładów. Budynek o adresie Bartycka 75 został wyburzony w ubiegłym roku pod inwestycję https://kkdominvest.pl/inwestycja-na-mokotowie/ Na miejskiej ortofotomapie z 2020 roku jeszcze go widać, ale obrys nie jest już widoczny na topograficznej. Na geoportalu też nie ma już obrysu. Usunięcie budynku i pozostawienie samego punktu adresowego zostało dokonane w zmianie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99600720
syntex (2021-09-10 12:13:06+00:00): Ok, bo brakowało tutaj na tyle dużo budynków, że byłem pewien, że istnieje. Na przyszłość możesz dodawać do adresu znacznik note=Budynek zburzono. Ja taki dodaję, by właśnie unikać takich błędów, szczególnie, gdy w danym miejscu brakuje budynków. Poprawiłem
ovruni (2021-09-08 00:16:43+00:00): Hola JAIR TONE, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado la abreviación "Rest.". [0] El uso de abreviaciones es desaconsejado en OSM.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_.28no_hacer_esto.29
ovruni (2021-09-08 00:30:03+00:00): Hola, en algunos de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado nombres con minusculas, el uso recomendado en OSM es el uso mixto. Poniendo en mayúsculas la primera letra de cada palabra en el nombre.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may.C3.BAsculas
DUGA (2024-06-24 14:42:13+00:00): Any legit reason to map this?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9072284523#map=19/39.72099/-76.66365
Allison P (2024-06-24 19:52:02+00:00): Any legit reason not to?
DUGA (2024-06-24 19:57:30+00:00): The state boundary is already there.
ElliottPlack (2024-06-25 02:34:28+00:00): It is there on the ground, so it can be mapped. We can map signs and borders. It shows the state maintenance may not follow the state line, as is sometimes the case.
Violaine_Do (2021-09-08 01:39:52+00:00): iaorana, tu viens de supprimer un batiment. Si tu veux uniquement supprimer le fait que ce soit un magasin il faut juste supprimer les tag shop=yes et name=Carovog. je peux faire un revert (annuler tes changements si besoin). La le bati a disparu de la carte ce qui n'est pas souhaité je pense, à moins que le bati n'existe plus du tout?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110883686
carovog (2021-09-08 05:42:53+00:00): Iaorana @Violaine_Do ! Oui j'ai dû faire une erreur, peux-tu rectifier ça ? Ce bâtiment est désormais notre entrepôt et n'est plus un magasin (j'aimerais qu'il ne soit plus référencé si possible sur la map car trop de confusion pour nos visiteurs)

 Autre question: Combien de temps pour que la map soit actualisée ? Notre magasin se trouve à l'emplacement de POLYNESIE MARINE à côté de Ets Aming, j'ai fait la rectification dans l'éditeur mais elle ne semble pas actualisée en mode "navigation" (si je puis dire). J'aimerais également supprimer "CAROVOG BATIR" de la map car les 2 sociétés ont fusionnées en 1 seule et s'appelle maintenant CAROVOG  mais je n'arrive pas à cliquer pour modifier. Désolé je viens de prendre en  main l'interface. Merci d'avance !
Violaine_Do (2021-10-24 02:59:16+00:00): ok, c'est fait
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110883686
❤️‍🔥 (2021-09-08 02:56:24+00:00): It is perfectly acceptable to map driveways. I've reverted this. If you don't like the look of it, use a map style that doesn't render driveways
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110883921
ralley (2021-09-10 02:38:12+00:00): You have been asked multiple times to please stop deleting driveways.  Just because you don't have a use for them does not mean they are useful.  There are many different renderers for OSM data, if you don't want to display driveways choose or configure a renderer that does not display them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110883921
❤️‍🔥 (2021-09-08 02:56:52+00:00): reverted along with https://osm.org/changeset/110883921
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110883978
Jarek 🚲 (2021-09-10 02:54:15+00:00): Hello Andrew, thank you for your updates in the GTA. This edit ended up making the entire Gardiner between Yonge and DVP mapped as closed for construction, which is not the case. Did this happen accidentally?
Kevo (2021-09-10 19:42:49+00:00): Also, many of your edits were of roads and other changes that haven't even begun.  Only changes that have happened or are actively underway should be mapped.
user_14024706 (2021-09-12 02:12:37+00:00): Gardiner on Exit157 has been discontinued
Jarek 🚲 (2021-09-12 02:37:24+00:00): Gardiner connects to the DVP. It's the continuation to east (locally known as the "Logan ramps" or "Logan exit") that is being demolished. That is correctly represented on the map.
mueschel (2021-09-14 13:45:56+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what a 'paste_bridge' is? This tag is not used in other places.
Sadhana Dhakal (2021-10-21 14:58:03+00:00): that Bridge name is paste bridge
Kovirii (2025-10-11 05:14:55+00:00): Looks like the address 1207 is for the Post Office to the East, while 1189 is the Gas Station.
skquinn (2021-09-08 02:33:09+00:00): Oops, Bing should have been included in imagery used/sources
ovruni (2021-09-08 02:39:47+00:00): Hola, he notado que en los últimos días diferentes cuentas han realizado por la zona ediciones similares a la suya donde se han agregado nombres ficticios en edificios. Lo que sugiere que existe en curso un conjunto de ediciones organizadas sin seguir las directrices de edición organizada. [0] Este tema ha sido comunicado en la lista de correos de la comunidad. [1] Por favor comunique a la persona u organización encargada para que se ponga en contacto mediante el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
[1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2021-September/000893.html
DressyPear4 (2021-09-08 11:58:23+00:00): Olá, se a calçada é paralela com a via não há necessidade de criar um caminho separado (pior ainda por cima das edificações) apenas adicione tags na via existente.
Layer -1 você está informando que o caminho é pelo subterrâneo, e esse não deve ser grudado nos prédios.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110885052
kikonit92 (2021-09-08 12:35:37+00:00): Entendo a sua opinião, mas existe duas peculiaridades na via: 1ª - ela é muito larga; e 2ª- as calçadas são cobertas pelos próprios prédios, por isso o "subterrâneo". E, como sou relativamente novo no OpenStreetMap, gostaria de saber se existe alternativas para colocar tais características de maneira respeitosa às diretrizes da plataforma.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110885052
DressyPear4 (2021-09-08 14:09:18+00:00): Para adicionar tags na própria via acrescentaria sidewalk=(valor correspondente)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
Se adicionar linha para cada calçada, na parte que passar por baixo do predio teria que colocar covered=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
ou seja, teria que dividir em vários pedacinhos, veja esse exemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775121568
aweech (2021-09-08 14:48:07+00:00): Hi,
In this edit you deleted a whole bunch of service roads associated with a new development off of Corporate Drive. I restored the service roads assuming that you were in error because you were looking at old imagery.
abg521 (2021-09-09 01:18:33+00:00): Oops, I thought it was old data but I see the other sat imagery with those. I went by the other day and didn't notice that
JJIglesias (2021-09-08 06:35:00+00:00): Slds Marco Antonio. Te sugiero q revises esa via con las imagenes de Mapillary q subi este fin de semana, precisamente de ese tramo hacia Morochata...
Carnildo (2021-09-08 21:40:03+00:00): What sort of a business is a "Chris O'Doherty - Windermere"?  It's useful to tag that so people can find it when searching by type, not just when searching by name.
CoyKoi (2021-09-09 10:20:09+00:00): Hi Paulie, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for the contributions. I've reviewed the edit and it all looks good. Always nice to have restaurants kept up to date!
Patr1k_P (2021-09-08 14:36:18+00:00): celu budovu si nemal mazat, len znacky ktore sa tykali restauracie
Patr1k_P (2021-09-08 14:39:40+00:00): si to zle pochopil a vymazal zas vsade budovy :/
Patr1k_P (2021-09-08 14:45:34+00:00): co sa tyka adries pozri si treba c. 15 vedla obchodu

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58850061

treba to tagovat takymto sposobom...ked nema obec ulice, nedava sa street ale place..
yrtimiD (2022-01-09 01:36:07+00:00): Hi, this is kind of useless change as areas which are not highways are not used for navigation, so bicycle=no will not affect anything. If you want to let mappes/users know some details, you can use note/description keys instead
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Patr1k_P (2021-09-08 14:49:10+00:00): v name len obecny urad