piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
olo81 (2022-12-15 17:23:28+00:00): Druga sprawa to że nie dublujemy nazw a teraz jest kilka parków, dodatkowo punktowa nazwa. A w rzeczywistości park jest jeden. Nie wystarczy poprawnie oznaczonych lasów zamienić na park.
eggie (2022-12-14 15:58:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Kleine stukjes groen zijn leisure=park..
Het lijkt erop dat je de landyse on Elburg hebt verwijderd.
Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. Dit gebeurt meestal om het spel PokemonGo te beïnvloeden. 
Je verwijdert de details en vervangt deze door een transparant.  
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam.  

Leisure=park is de functie en die moet je los zien van wat je ziet de landuse. 

Hier een voorbeeld van een park met landuse en een losse cover leisure= park er helemaal los overheen. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-12-14 16:05:15+00:00): reverted by changeset #130081712

Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-14 16:14:13+00:00): Verlengde Schietweg 9 heb je ergens anders geplaatst in 't Harde.
Dat heb ik hersteld. 
Meestal gebeurt dat bij schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Elk begin is moeilijk.
Lees je svp goed in voordat dat op grote schaal zomaar van alles gaat veranderen op de kaart. 

Je edits...  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130079964

Groet
eggie
Henkje20 (2022-12-14 19:52:19+00:00): Oké ik snap nu dat een park een laat is op een bestaande onderliggende laat als een weide of een bosgebied. Heb ik dan nu het honingsveld juist toegevoegd?
eggie (2022-12-14 20:10:23+00:00): Henk.. ik zal zo even kijken..
Laat je niet weerhouden door krtiek.
Ik zet zo wel commentaar op je changeset voor dat park.
Mapse
Eggie
hatul (2023-01-17 16:39:13+00:00): אתה מתבקש לא לשנות שמות סתם. זו לא הנקודה היחידה שסתם שינית.
SafwatHalaby (2025-05-18 19:40:59+00:00): 2 years later, the user is still doing this. Discussion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/157482706
bxl-forever (2022-12-14 16:49:09+00:00): Hello,

Your changeset has no title, therefore we’ll have to guess what you wanted to do.

You added the name Libburo to the building.

I don’t think this is the _name_ of the building.  Libburo is a company, right?  It’s probably better to tag it as a simple node within this building, and use a proper office:* tag.

I can do it if you want.  What kind of company is that?  Is there a website we can link to, or any relevant contact details?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-12-19 08:54:40+00:00): Hey Yves,

This changeset is made with Gnome-Maps; this is quite experimental software. I'll experiment with this on the meetup tomorrow
Nidal Tech (2022-12-19 09:49:39+00:00): Hello,
libburo is a kind of library/tobacco shop and a parcel pickup point for companies like DPD, ... that's why I wanted to add it because many people might seek for it.
Also this was my very first contribution to OSM via Gnome-maps. I wasn't sure about how to add it. 
I will contribute to fill in all relevant shops in my area if I learn how to do it properly.
Kr
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-12-19 09:52:54+00:00): Hi Nidal,

You can also easily add shops with mapcomplete.osm.be/shops, cafés with mapcomplete.osm.be/cafes_and_pubs and restaurants with https://mapcomplete.osm.be/food

(And there are some other maps too on mapcomplete.osm.be/)

(Disclaimer: I'm the dev of MapComplete).

I also had a look to the edit functionality of Gnome Maps, it is somewhat basic; so don't feel guilty.
bxl-forever (2022-12-19 16:56:08+00:00): Thanks for the explanation.
I will fix the tags here.
Have a nice day.
Jrachi (2022-12-15 13:37:10+00:00): Non usare 
osmc:symbol=red:red:white_stripe:000:black
Se il percorso ha un ref devi mettere quel numero al posto di "000".
Ma qui non hai messo alcun ref!
eggie (2022-12-14 16:02:38+00:00): Ook hier verwijder je alle landuse in Elburg...
In een eerder commentaar heb ik al proberen uit te leggen dat de functie leisure=park als een losse deken ligt over de landuse en water 
Een park heeft dan ook meestal een naam.
Je edits zullen worden teruggezet.

Svp stoppen met het verwijderen van landuse

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-14 16:04:18+00:00): reverted by changeset #130081688
amadvance (2022-12-14 20:53:03+00:00): Ciao  mngon,

Ho visto che stai aggiungendo le relazioni della REL marcate come "tr" in Valle Imagna. Queste relazioni non hanno nessuna marcatura sul terreno (sono del posto) e quindi non si qualificano per essere rappresentate in OpenStreetMap.

Per questo sono da rimuovere.

Tra l'altro, aggiungendole tutte si nasconderebbero i veri sentieri marcati sul terreno,  come quelli CAI, rendendo la mappa di più difficile lettura.

Nel caso possiamo discuterne nella lista talk-it, ma la conclusione sarà sicuramente che vanno eliminate.

Ciao,
Andrea
Giuseppe Cillis (2022-12-15 12:12:30+00:00): Ciao,
grazie per il messaggio.
Il caricamento deriva da un dataset ufficiale che è stato inoltrato della comunità montana e che fa riferimento alla REL. 
Però in considerazione di quello scritto, provvederò a rimuovere i sentieri indicati così da correggerli in futuro quando le cose saranno chiare. 
Saluti
Jrachi (2022-12-15 13:25:06+00:00): A me non è chiara la fonte dati. Cercando sul sito regionale ho trovato solo un "© Copyright Regione Lombardia - tutti i diritti riservati" che rendono i dati di questa fonte incompatibili con la licenza OSM.
amadvance (2022-12-15 14:30:42+00:00): Ciao mngon,

Grazie. Nel caso ti possa essere utile ho scritto un messaggio nella lista talk-it, che spiega meglio le ragioni:

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2022-December/074615.html

Ciao,
Andrea
amadvance (2022-12-24 08:25:49+00:00): Ciao mngon,

Riguardo la licenza, ho cercato un po' ed effettivamente c'è un problema. La REL è rilasciata dalla Regione/ERSAF con licenza CC-BY-4 e tale licenza non è compatibile con OpenStreetmap.

Ti metto i due link di riferimento. Il primo è della REL che dice che è CC-BY-4 il secondo è di OpenStreetMap che dice che CC-BY-4 non è compatibile ed è richiesto un permesso esplicito della Regione/ERSAF per l'utilizzo di tali dati in OpenStreetMap.

https://www.geoportale.regione.lombardia.it/en/metadati?p_p_id=detailSheetMetadata_WAR_gptmetadataportlet&p_p_lifecycle=0&p_p_state=normal&p_p_mode=view&_detailSheetMetadata_WAR_gptmetadataportlet_uuid=%7B948F0A78-F285-4932-9D06-8368A760A129%7D

https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/

Ciao,
Andrea
Jrachi (2022-12-24 09:08:47+00:00): Dai commenti sui changeset sembra che tu stia lavorando per il CAI.
In Piemonte abbiano la piena collaborazione con la regione, ed in effetti il catasto piemontese è stato rilevato in maniera quasi integrale dal CAI, e con la convenzione CAI - OSM, abbiamo automaticamente la licenza per inserire i dati ufficiali su OSM.
Non è che la SOSEC Lombardia abbia accordi simili con la regione?
Se ci fosse un qualcosa di scritto che permette al CAI l'utilizzo dei dati regionali, non ci sarebbero problemi di licenza.

Ivo
amadvance (2022-12-24 10:16:35+00:00): Ciao Jrachi,

Si. Il CAI di Bergamo mi ha fornito il suo shapefile per la mappatura in OpenStreetMap, ma è differente dalla REL. Tutte queste relazioni ad esempio non ci sono.

Non sono a conoscenza di particolari accordi, e credo che se ci fossero, dovrebbe essere presenti in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors

Ciao,
Andrea
amadvance (2022-12-29 15:09:04+00:00): Ciao mngon,

Vedo che stai continuando a mappare queste relazioni. Fai attenzione che così facendo senza affrontare i problemi esposti, rischi di fare lavoro per nulla.

In particolare, sono relazioni senza evidenza sul terreno, da informazioni vecchie e quindi non affidabili (ho mappe del 2011 che le hanno), e con la licenza CC-BY-4 incompatibile.

Sei anche pregato di non mappare nuove way dalla REL. Tutta questa zona è stata mappata con survey. Se una way non è mappata, è perché non c'è o ha altri problemi. 

OpenStreetMap è di maggior qualità rispetto alla REL in questa zona. Aggiungere way dalla REL senza una survey che le confermi, stai diminuendo la qualità.

Ciao,
Andrea
amadvance (2023-01-12 06:46:02+00:00): Ciao mngon,

Ho sentito il CAI di Bergamo, e mi confermano che tali relazioni sono nella REL sostanzialmente perché l'accatastamento nella REL è una precondizione per accedere ai finanziamenti regionali, ma di fatto non corrispondono a veri  percorsi come sono i sentieri CAI.

Sono frutto di rilevamenti fatti una quindicina di anni fa non dal CAI, ma da un mix di volontari e Comunità Montana anche collaborando con una azienda locale che produce mappe.

Considerando tutto questo e anche la questione non risolta della licenza CC-BY-4.0 della REL, non vedo alternativa se non all'eliminazione di tali relazioni. 

Capisco che la cosa possa essere seccante, ma obbiettivamente è l'unica cosa da fare.

Me ne occuperò io nei prossimi giorni.

Ciao,
Andrea
luxiaghd (2022-12-14 15:51:49+00:00): testing error, have reverted.
luxiaghd (2022-12-14 15:51:42+00:00): testing error, have reverted.
luxiaghd (2022-12-14 15:51:33+00:00): testing error, have reverted.
Brandon Sutton (2022-12-14 21:22:33+00:00): Incorrect changeset description.  Includes multiple citywide revisions to address a scope of bicycle facilities from the past several years.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-12-24 09:35:59+00:00): This changeset was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130086604 by Mazda05.
gscholz (2022-12-15 08:26:12+00:00): Hi sempreingiro666,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-5.78842&lat=32.07154&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130081191

This kind of error irritates routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Friendly_Ghost (2022-12-24 09:37:21+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130449321
MikeN (2022-12-14 18:28:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  This is the correct use of the access private tag since it is gated.
user_5359 (2022-12-15 10:50:42+00:00): Hallo Wanderfalter! 
Ich habe mir erlaubt Dein Tippfehler acess mit access zu korrigieren. Ich hätte eine Rückfrage, warum die Verkehrszeichen nicht als Punkt markiert wurden (Aufstellungsort nicht Wirkungsraum).

Grüße aus Würzburg nach Bonn!
Wanderfalter (2022-12-15 11:18:26+00:00): Hallo user_5359!
Die Verkehrszeichen sind z.Z. noch prov. aufgestellt und werden von den Landwirten in ihrer Position oftmals verändert.
Der genaue Standort wird wahrscheinlich erst in einigen Wochen feststehen. 
Grüße aus dem Rheinland!
Salsicha019 (2022-12-14 16:28:52+00:00): boa tarde, exclui pois fique uma tarde toda atolado nessa região por tentar passar por essa "estrada"
DressyPear4 (2022-12-14 17:16:35+00:00): Você pode rebaixar para track e definir o tipo de superfície
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
DressyPear4 (2022-12-14 17:18:04+00:00): Caminhões ficam atolados todos os dias na rodovia Transamazônica, nem por isso deve ser deletada.
Salsicha019 (2022-12-14 19:17:11+00:00): Tranamazônica, br-319 e outras da regioão são rodovias, essa é uma estrada que foi convertida em lavoura e tomada por reflorestamentos, onde nem os moradores da região a utilizam
Henkje20 (2022-12-14 19:36:19+00:00): Waarom heeft u het Honingsveld park verwijderd? Dit is een nieuw aangelegd park in de wijk oostendorp van Elburg. Daarnaast heeft u een gesloopt gebouw aan de wimpel 6 weer toegevoegd terwijl dit er niet meer staat. Wie bent u eigenlijk? Een beheerder?
eggie (2022-12-14 20:08:12+00:00): Dag Henk..

Wanneer je een park wilt toevoegen kun je een los vlak over water geboomte en gras intekenen met leisure=park.
Op dat vlak zet je de naam.
Ik heb echt geen park met een naam verwijderd. .. alleen de landuse grass hersteld.
Ik heb geen gesloopt gebouw teruggezet.
Even ctrl f5. Cache leegmaken.. dan zie je dat het weg is.
Verder ben ik gewoon een medemapper die de welkomstmails verstuurt en ik doe de eerste screening.
Mvg
Eggie
Friendly_Ghost (2022-12-14 17:50:42+00:00): Hello. I reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130084976. Do not map in Ukraine until the war has ended.
eggie (2022-12-14 21:28:35+00:00): Dag Enadeag.. Wanneer het oneway=no  is dan kunnen de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers ook weg.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130082060
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-12-14 21:33:04+00:00): De Artsenijstraat heb ik voorzien van oneway=yes  Het is gewoon eenrichtingsverkeer muv tweewielers.
Groet
eggie
Enadeag (2022-12-14 21:41:46+00:00): Sinds een week of 3/4 is dat geen oneway=yes meer. De werkzaamheden daar hebben geresulteerd dat het stuk dat ik had aangepast daadwerkelijk tweerichtingen is. 

In ieder geval staat er nergens meer een indicatie dat dit nogsteeds eenrichtingsverkeer is. 

Waar ik niet 100% zeker van ben, maar dat controleer ik morgen nogmaals als ik daar ben: Een bocht restrictie wanneer er vanaf de Artsenijstraat de Dokter Bakstraat wordt opgedraaid, dat mag alleen als het verkeer rechtsaf afslaat.
eggie (2022-12-14 22:00:01+00:00): Ahh oke..  maar wat jij juist had gedaan is oneway=no verwijderd  Dat zou dan juist correct zijn geweest. Alleen dat strookt niet met de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers.
Dus de voorgaande mapper Seat Ibiza had het goed gedaan, maar was vergeten de uitzonderingen te verwijderen.
Ik pas het wel even aan. Dan kun je evt die afslagbeperking zelf toevoegen na controle.

Groet en bedankt voor je reactie
eggie
eggie (2022-12-14 22:02:02+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast naar oneway=no en een note toegevoegd.. Uitzondering tweewielers heb ik verwijderd,
gr eggie
gscholz (2022-12-16 06:33:35+00:00): Hi dianamadde,
I have reverted this changeset as it added a lot of errors to the database regarding not existent water areas:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130082724

Please watch out what you are doing.
Kind regards
Guido
BCNorwich (2022-12-15 08:13:06+00:00): Hi, I see from the list above that there are several resolved tags, which is good, but also 16 warnings about crossing highways/waterways. There are also 5 warnings about crossing highways. As well as some other warnings.

I would usually correct the odd mistake myself but this changeset is rather large. So could you please have a look at correcting any problems highlighted in the warnings?

Regards Bernard.
JasmineRanasinghe (2022-12-15 12:33:30+00:00): Hi Bernard, thanks for pointing out those problems highlighted in the warnings. I have gone through the paths and corrected those with warnings which should all now be resolved. 

Best wishes, Jasmine.
BCNorwich (2022-12-16 07:54:52+00:00): Hi, One more duplication. I've removed a diplicated section of Way: 33902203

Regards Bernard.
JasmineRanasinghe (2022-12-22 12:14:33+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
wkdgs (2023-01-30 16:12:15+00:00): Hi,

auch private Grundstückszufahrten können in OpenStreetMap gemappt werden und sollten nicht ohne besonderen Grund gelöscht werden. Ich habe deine Änderungen daher rückgängig gemacht.

Damit es besser als private Zufahrt zu erkennen ist habe ich noch die Tags "service=driveway" und "access=private" hinzugefügt.

Hier findest du mehr Infos dazu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service%3Ddriveway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130082936
MikeN (2022-12-14 18:42:30+00:00): Hi, this road appears to be privately owned, but not gated and therefore not privately accessed.   Bing streetview also does not show a no-trespassing sign.   It had been previously created as a 'residential' road.    It should be changed to type service / driveway and the 'private' attribute removed.   The neighboring driveway's private access should also be removed - in the past too many were marked as private in  a  confusion over private ownership and private access.
1998alexkane (2022-12-15 10:45:56+00:00): Hi!

Could you tell me the purpace of the nodes with the tag done=yes? (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10262869354)

Thanks!
pkoby (2022-12-15 14:05:06+00:00): Whoops! I'm using a reference dataset of cycle infrastructure (not an import), and I left behind some nodes because my JOSM filters hid them. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. I'll clean them up.
Benoît C MdP (2022-12-15 07:46:41+00:00): Bonjour Paul,

Je n'ai pas compris ta contribution. La mise à sens unique avec couloir bus à contresens de la rue de Reuilly aurait été annulée ? C'est ce que tu as vu cette semaine sur le terrain ? 

Bonne continuation

Benoît
Paul Racanière (2022-12-15 12:43:24+00:00): Bonjour,
J'avais à tord indiqué que la rue de Reuilly sur toute sa longueur était à sens unique sauf bus alors qu'après vérification sur le terrain, il n'y a qu'une seule partie proche de Montgallet qui est en tête bêche sauf bus.
Les parties proche de Diderot et place Eboué continuent d'être des double-sens généraux, notamment pour limiter l'impact de la modification du plan de circulation sur les sorties de parking.
emersonveenstra (2022-12-14 18:16:35+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your contributions! opening hours have a strict syntax requirement, please see the wiki examples here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Simple_examples and the generator here: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
Would you please go back through and fix your opening hours? Thanks!
emersonveenstra (2022-12-14 18:17:03+00:00): Oh, also phone numbers must include the country code
Jrachi (2022-12-15 07:44:52+00:00): Attento!
nella way:
Percorso: La strà di vacch (159949689)

hai messo :
    "ford"="yes"
    "note"="Difficult and dangerous ford, only possible with low water"

Invece di metterli solo sul punto di guado.
VictorIE (2023-01-05 13:23:18+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1122100238

Could you check surface=* here? :)
eireidium (2023-01-05 13:34:39+00:00): Thanks for catching that. Have no idea how the clipboard got pasted into the surface label. Apologies. Fixed.
VictorIE (2023-01-05 15:42:35+00:00): Oh it happens, although I usually catch it. :D
DiogoBaptista98 (2023-01-28 16:41:31+00:00): Porque adicionaste material falso que não se encontra na realidade nomeadamente os campos na futura feira popular de lisboa? Aconselho a verificares as imagens mais recentes de satelite.
topolusitania (2023-01-29 12:17:49+00:00): O comentário acima é o típico caso de uma observação não construtiva e quase agressiva que pode contribuir para o afastamento de colaboradores.
Eis, o que acho que deveria ter sido escrito:
" Olá Daniel Nunes. Verifiquei que há dois meses actualizas-te a zona da futura Feira Popular de Lisboa com dois campos de desporto e um arruamento. Infelizmente as fotos que usast5e estão muito desactualizadas e o que mapeaste já não existe. Experimenta usar as fotos da empresa MAXAR e poderás verificar a diferença. Boas edições"

Porque escrevo este reparo ? Porque se queremos contribuir para o OSM a nossa principal função de mapeadores experientes não é a de desenhar novas informações e actualizações. È a de estimular mapeadores ocasionais a serem mais participativos e de captar novos colaboradores. Não é quase acusar de mentiroso (adicionaste material falso) um colaborador que usou uma foto desactualizada seguramente com boas intenções
TL
Ale_Zena_IT (2023-01-27 21:16:50+00:00): Guardando il sito dell'associazione non sembra svolgano servizi ospedalieri. Essendo in ambito sociale, bisognerebbe usare https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility amenity=social_facility
aliensuperstar (2022-12-14 19:34:28+00:00): Thanks!
silversurfer83 (2022-12-14 21:45:10+00:00): Freut mich, dass Du meinen Kommentar gelesen hast :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/130084360
gscholz (2022-12-16 06:33:51+00:00): Hi dianamadde,
I have reverted this changeset as it added a lot of errors to the database regarding not existent water areas:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130084432

Please watch out what you are doing.
Kind regards
Guido
Patr1k_P (2022-12-17 13:30:07+00:00): Hi, why did you remove this building? The building has an address and according to the satellite images it is not demolished

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84905948/history
NorthCrab (2022-12-14 18:27:58+00:00): Witamy na OpenStreetMap!

Czemu ta nazwa ulicy jest taka dziwna? Na danych z geoportalu, poprzednia nazwa wydawała się być poprawna - ale może jest coś czego nie wiem. Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-14 18:38:40+00:00): Okej wszystko zrozumiałem 😂

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96824817
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108969518
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110480831
Herr Huber (2023-09-15 10:11:19+00:00): Schau mal hier, da wird Deine Bearbeitung in Frage gestellt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3494633
Vielleicht magst Du auch was dazu sagen (hab den Marker allerdings geschlossen, vermute aber, flohoff macht den wieder auf, da er ja sowieso immer das letzte Wort haben muss...)
gscholz (2022-12-16 06:34:28+00:00): Hi dianamadde,
I have reverted this changeset as it added a lot of errors to the database regarding not existent water areas:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130085135

Please watch out what you are doing.
Kind regards
Guido
pitscheplatsch (2025-10-13 09:18:45+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM.

Your changeset should be reviewed by the local community.

Thanks.
lluv (2022-12-14 18:12:49+00:00): POI was on the map three times. Deleted one of the POI nodes and updated the remaining tags.
Still, it's duplicated now: It seems to be useful to have a POI node on the main building, but then again the path marks the (restricted) area where you would be outside for cafe/bar setting.
flo2154 (2023-01-13 22:02:43+00:00): "bicycle_parking = stands" doesn't really make sense on an "amenity = bicycle_rental". Did you maybe mean "bicycle_rental = docking_station" instead, or is there another bicycle parking next to the rental station?
DilanKoyunoglu (2023-01-14 09:44:03+00:00): I don't remember I put the "bicycle_parking = stands" maybe it was like that before so I didn't want to change it, usually I'm checking if the address tag and station name are correct or not. However, I can add "bicycle_rental = docking_station" instead of "bicycle_parking = stands" if you like.
Thanks
Best
flo2154 (2023-02-05 11:14:48+00:00): It depends how the bicycle rental station looks like. Is it a docking station? But in any case, the bicycle_parking tag doesn't make sense.

Also, I just noticed that there is another bicycle rental station mapped in OSM nearby: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8151192050

Please verify which position is correct and merge those two duplicates into one node.
eggie (2022-12-14 21:21:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab (2022-12-14 19:10:38+00:00): Witamy na OpenStreetMap!
"zaproponowanie" - czy te zmiany są fikcyjne? jeśli tak, to należy je wycofać. jeśli propozycja jest oficjalna, to można ewentualnie użyć tagów proposed. Pozdrawiam!
SzymonH (2022-12-14 20:29:20+00:00): To wandalizm do wycofania. Problem twórcy fikcyjnych łączników torów tramwajowych mamy tu od niemal roku.
syntex (2022-12-14 21:05:56+00:00): Wycofane
:-} (2022-12-22 12:17:36+00:00): Pomysłowość zaproponuj w google maps albo w jakiejś grze
NorthCrab (2022-12-22 15:49:10+00:00): ez_mastez171 nie bądź niemiły dla nowych… każdy się uczy. a tym sam masz sobie sporo do zarzucenia.