piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:35:58+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
timmito (2020-10-25 17:50:17+00:00): Hallo roema, Danke für deine Ergänzung. Ich habe es noch mal korrigiert. Bitte auf gemischte Groß- und Kleinschreibung mit Großschreibung für den ersten Buchstaben achten. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
FreedSky (2020-11-30 02:33:16+00:00): 国が島に長期間駐留している場合を除いて、この方法を行政上の境界に追加しないでください。
Please do not add this way to any administrative boundary unless a country is stationed on the island for a long time.
damember (2020-11-30 15:06:58+00:00): According to the OpenStreetMap wiki, the following is a description of how to resolve disputed names:
“In the case where there are multiple local names, then if the government with effective and sustained control of the area has an official source of names or an official stance on a naming dispute, then that name is default.”
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes

Therefore, I tagged it as a Japanese border because this area is effectively controlled by Japan.
user_2008655 (2021-11-01 06:26:13+00:00): As suggested by Supaplex, the only preferred way to discuss any (INCLUDES the shapes of way combinations) edits of this area is to contact data working group, are you already a member of them? I'm requesting so, so if not, please consult one of their members to get informations on how to request joining, any edits that are not from this group can, should and were already reverted by every members of that group.
aachso (2020-10-25 17:15:02+00:00): Hallo zinkenmartin und willkommen bei OSM!

Deine Bearbeitung hat keine Änderungen enthalten. Was wolltest du denn ändern?
zinkenmartin (2020-10-26 12:26:21+00:00): Moin, danke. Ich wollte eigentlich neue Informationen für das Restaurant hinterlegen, zum Beispiel die Webseite und Telefonnummer. Das hat ia anscheinend nicht geklappt. Soll ich es dann einfach noch mal probieren?
aachso (2020-10-26 13:08:13+00:00): Ja, versuch es einfach nochmal. Falls es nicht funktioniert, probier es mal im Browser: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?node=1204819870

Viel Erfolg! :)
Nakaner (2020-10-26 08:46:08+00:00): Hallo,

nehmen die Büroräume die gesamte Fläche des Hauses in allen Stockwerken (ausgenommen Garagen/Lagerräume ein)? Falls nein, bitte ich dich einen separaten Node mitten im Gebäude anzulegen und diesen als Büro zu erfassen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93020725
LorenzoPesci (2020-10-25 21:45:45+00:00): What is this? "Nonna Ana Maria Stella Childhood House"
Rafael Raposo Pires (2020-10-26 08:54:35+00:00): I did not want to create a public pin, how do I delete it?
LorenzoPesci (2020-10-26 09:10:52+00:00): edit button - select point - edit or delete the point
user_5359 (2020-10-29 06:17:58+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.

CAT_CALLE=CVIA2L
ESTADO=EN USO
FECHA=0000/00/00
NOMBRE=CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE ALEMANIA; CALLE DEMETRIO KORSI
OBJECTID=7573; 3779; 202; 4872; 7680; 2132; 6304; 2761; 986; 8374; 2131; 6431; 6414; 4371; 5386; 4782
RUTA_ID=122; 122; 122; 122; 122; 122; 122; 122; 122; 122; 122; 122; 122; 212
RV_CATEGOR=0

see https://www.osm.org/way/863553876
Trevor_1 (2020-11-01 23:50:00+00:00): I'll delete the extra tags. They must have already been on there when I split the line
felipeeugenio (2020-10-25 19:40:30+00:00): Hola.
Est{á terminada esa construcción? Las fotos que vemos son de mayo de este año y da la impresión de que falta harto. Incluso hay una edificación atravezada. Saludos
SqAll (2020-10-28 19:24:03+00:00): Hola, sí, está construida la calle. Aún no la entregan formalmente, pero ya se puede transitar en vehículo. Falta que habiliten unos semáforos.
mjans (2020-12-19 11:17:32+00:00): Net voorbij gewandeld/gereden. De baan + fietspaden zijn (terug) open voor alle verkeer.
GR-menneke (2020-12-20 20:07:23+00:00): Dag Mjans, bedankt voor de tip. Ik heb er vandaag ook over gereden, en zojuist de nodige aanpassingen gedaan (sta zeker open voor suggesties ;-) ). GRoetjes, GR-menneke
ToniE (2020-10-26 09:07:53+00:00): Servus nw520,

passt das, dass der 285er nur network=saarVV hat, denn der fährt mMn nicht (nur) im Saarland und fehlt nun in der Auswertung für VRN .

Gruß,
Toni
nw520 (2020-10-26 09:57:41+00:00): Hallo ToniE,
du hast natürlich recht, dass der VRN fehlte. Den habe ich jetzt an Master und allen 4 Routenrelationen nachgetragen. Bei zwei Routenrelationen habe ich dafür den saarVV entfernt.

Entschuldigung für den Fehler und danke für den Hinweis!
user_11435438 (2020-11-20 09:48:21+00:00): Hi. 東急電鉄 is not Tokyo Metro or Toei Subway, why do you think it should be tagged as subway?
DaveF (2020-10-26 15:53:57+00:00): Hi
Could you clarify the purpose of your edit to Green Park?
What happened to its original polygon way?
Why have you made it a MP with only one member?
Why is there a MP of all the trees?
ecatmur (2020-10-26 20:44:59+00:00): Sure!

> Could you clarify the purpose of your edit to Green Park?

Correct the eastern boundary - it is a more or less straight fence, not the complicated shape that was there before. I figured that was probably the shape of the adjacent gardens, so I split that into ways 863554955 and 156867476.

> What happened to its original polygon way?

Converted to a multipolygon - this is what iD does when you split a polygon way.

> Why have you made it a MP with only one member?

See above. If you want to convert it back to a single polygon feel free - I don't think it's possible in iD, or at least I don't know how. It's complicated by the grass relation 7578325 sharing the outer way, so if you could fix that at the same time that'd be great.

> Why is there a MP of all the trees?

No idea, it was like that when I got here.
DaveF (2020-11-21 13:56:03+00:00): Thanks for the detailed reply.

>Converted to a multipolygon - this is what iD does when you split a polygon way.

I think this is incorrect behaviour by iD. It assumes the user's desired end result is a MP. Just because it does it, it doesn't mean it's right way to leave it. Unless they're extremely long, splitting polygons into MPs is unnecessary.
Jakka (2020-10-26 08:41:24+00:00): Indien geen toegang deel over particuliere eigendom op "access=no" zetten ?
eggie (2020-10-25 16:50:08+00:00): Top!
Gr eggie
Jakka (2020-10-26 08:43:04+00:00): name=Moordplaats Henri d'Udekem d'Acoz eerder een beschrijving en dat staat er reeds.
simulator1 (2020-10-26 08:47:11+00:00): Zašto je izbrisana Ciglenica?
https://mapiranjetresnjevke.com/kvartovi/ciglenica/
eggie (2020-10-25 17:00:09+00:00): Hi Cavemaker.. All buildings are 'import' from the Dutch Kadaster. The outline must be oke.
An attached roof must be add seperately and tagged with bullding =roof.
greetz,
eggie
Cavemaker (2020-10-25 17:25:23+00:00): It's like small overhang coming from the roof, you can see it on street view. It's new, that's why it wasn't imported yet.
eggie (2020-10-25 18:08:16+00:00): Oke.. I changed this part to building= roof..
I use the transparant from de BGT omtrekgericht.

Sometimes we have problems with BAG updates. You will get your old shape back.
Gr eggie
damember (2020-10-25 23:47:41+00:00): According to the OpenStreetMap wiki, the following is a description of how to resolve disputed names:
“In the case where there are multiple local names, then if the government with effective and sustained control of the area has an official source of names or an official stance on a naming dispute, then that name is default.” 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes
Therefore, I tagged it as a Japanese border because this area is effectively controled by Japan.
user_2008655 (2021-11-01 06:23:08+00:00): Please do not do so, because even Japanese government doesn't have effective military controls, this is confirmed by Supaplex (a Taiwanese OpenStreetMap editor)
highflyer74 (2022-08-03 10:57:03+00:00): Moin!

Es ist zwar schon etwas her, aber vielleicht kannst du dich erinnern, ob diese Reparaturstation wirklich so heißt, oder ob sie vielleicht gar keinen Namen hat (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name).

Viele Grüße!
HansDerRadler (2022-08-19 16:53:47+00:00): Moin highflyer74!
Wir haben hier im Rems-Murr-Kreis inzwischen mehr als 50 solcher Reparaturstationen, alle haben ein einheitliches Design und sind mit der Bezeichung "Fahrrad-Reparaturstation" bedruckt. Das Landratsamt sponsert die Stationen und in allen Publikationen werden diese Stationen hier im Kreis so benannt. Daher habe ich den Namen bei allen diesen Stationen so eingetragen.
Viele Grüße!
HansDerRadler
highflyer74 (2022-08-20 10:34:12+00:00): Moin Hans und danke für deine Rückmeldung!

In diesem Fall ist es nicht völlig falsch, bereitet aber vermutlich einigen Leuten Bauchschmerzen, denn im Grunde ist es nur eine Beschreibung der Einrichtung, damit Leute wissen, um was es sich handelt. 

Im OSM-Sinne sagt amenity=bicycle_repair_station ja bereits aus, was es ist, insofern wird das name=* Tag ein bisschen "mißbraucht". Das wäre so ähnlich wie name=Sitzbank.

Sinnvoller wäre es, sofern die Dinger z.B. nummeriert sind, diese als ref=* einzutragen, bzw. name=* nur zu verwenden, wenn sie wirklich einen Eigennamen (fiktiv: "Reparaturstation Meyerstraße") haben.

Ist kein Beinbruch, ich wollte nur darauf hinweisen, da es durchaus vorkommen kann, dass ein anderer Mapper das name=* Tag mit obiger Argumentation entfernt.

Gruss aus dem Norden!
VitalieS (2020-10-25 19:22:27+00:00): Bună. Cafeneaua nu se află de partea opusă a clădirii? Iar în locul unde se află acum nu e un magazin alimentar?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93021997
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:36:13+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
PT-53 (2020-10-26 07:49:55+00:00): Hallo Chris,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz - wohl aus Versehen - diesen "Way" mit nur einem Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863559407/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8044489161/history
neu angelegt. Ich habe diesen wieder gelöscht.

Der von Dir neu eingezeichnete Parkplatz
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863559411/history
reicht in dieses Baugebiet hinein:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518403974/history
Das wird so wohl auch nicht ganz korrekt sein.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
ChrisFromRV (2020-10-26 13:36:40+00:00): Das Gebiet ist kein Baugebiet, sondern brachliegendes Land. Es gibt keine Begrenzung zwischen dem Parkplatz und der anliegenden Fläche. Der Parkplatz ist auch nicht geteert, sondern es wurde nur die brachliegende Fläche planiert.
PT-53 (2020-10-26 13:40:00+00:00): Parkplatz oder Brache? Beides sollte sich nicht überlappen.
Frans S (2020-10-27 11:02:57+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

The Maxar Imagery shows many more buildings here which still have to be  mapped.

Best regards and keep mapping.
Frans S (2020-10-26 12:34:32+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93022298
gmckone (2020-10-27 01:25:48+00:00): Thank you Frans S I appreciate your feedback. Yes I was primarily using Maxar, but did switch between backgrounds to try to identify permanent features better.  I may have unintentionally left bing imagery up.  I'll keep that in mind! Be well!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93022298
Jorisbo (2020-10-25 17:40:02+00:00): Dankjewel voor het repareren
gr Joris
noelbov (2020-10-25 21:27:19+00:00): Graag gedaan,
mvg.
Noël
Frans S (2020-10-26 12:34:25+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93022572
sorcrosc (2021-05-10 19:39:31+00:00): Ciao. Questo supermercato è stato spostato ma l'indirizzo non corrisponde al luogo in cui si trova ora.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4012298689

Puoi controllare?

Grazie
Tomas Straupis (2020-10-26 06:18:22+00:00): Should I report you to DWG for damaging data even after being warned about it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11759924
Andrea Musuruane (2020-10-26 15:44:31+00:00): Ciao. Hai cambiato l'etichetta nel percorso 443466609 da highway=track (strada agricola o forestale) a barrier=kerb (un cordolo): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443466609 La modifica sembra senza senso. Ciao, Andrea
aceman444 (2020-11-18 11:19:27+00:00): Hi, Bing is really outdated in Slovakia, please use ESRI and Maxar imagery, or best high res is Ortofotomozaika SR, albeit sometimes older than Maxar/ESRI. The buildings you added do not exist anymore.
Константин Гам (2020-10-26 11:29:51+00:00): Пожалуйста не создавайте дубли, магазин уже есть на карте
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:41:29+00:00): source: bustimes.org
compdude (2020-11-02 02:06:06+00:00): How is this "Not long enough of a segment between intersections?" It's over 5 miles. There are many freeways of that length.
deven_smith_ (2020-12-06 22:01:48+00:00): From ID 53 to ID 54, this could definitely be a freeway. Once Garwood is rebuilt next year, it will have no same level intersections and the speed limit is 70 all the way
Константин Гам (2020-10-26 16:13:45+00:00): Это мягко говоря не Коммунар :)
Алекс Мок (2020-10-26 16:42:32+00:00): Ну немножко левее))
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:04:48+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93023937
Frans S (2020-10-26 12:34:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93023977
kartler175 (2020-10-26 08:04:11+00:00): What is the reason for the revert? What is the effective source of your changes?
pio2_122 (2020-10-25 18:46:28+00:00): Proszę, nie przenoś ręcznie punktów adresowych na budynki, jeśli nie przepiszesz wszystkich tagów z punktu na obrys. W ten sposób usunąłeś ważne informacje źródłowe.

Prostym sposobem na automatyczne przeniesienie tagów z punktu na obrys jest opcja:
1. trzeba zaznaczyć obrys i punkt leżący na nim za pomocą schifta
2. kliknąć na klawiaturze "c"
3. gotowe

Z góry dzięki
Cascafico (2020-10-26 17:30:51+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM,

il tag foot=yes è ridondante per la highway=footway

Nel caso di sentiero, cioè non pavimentato e senza cordoli, meglio highway=path
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93024640
aceman444 (2020-12-23 21:03:54+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za aktualizacie oblasti. Nekomplikujete to ale prerabanim vsetkeho na multipolygony? Aky to ma prinos?
Jan K-J (2020-12-27 19:37:34+00:00): Zdar! Majme 2 obrlzniky ABCD a CDEF ktore maju spolocnu hranu CD. Nech jeden je povedzme les a druhy vinica. Potom mame dve moznosti: 1) Vytvorime obdlznik ABCD a tiez obdlznik CDEF ako uzavretu way a jednej takto vytvorenej oblasti dame atribut "les" a druhej "vinica". Takto tam vsak mame usecku CD dvakrat ,nakrelenu jednu "na druhej". 2) Urobime neuzavrete ways CBAD, DEFC a tiez CD, z CBAD a CD urobime multypolygon "les" a z DEFC a CD vinicu. Toto je zdanlivo zlozitejsie ale v skutocnosti to ma spustu vyhod, napr. ked sa ide hranica medzi oboma oblastami upravovat, spresnovat, a pod. V skutonosti by sa - podla mna - ways mali prekryvat len naozaj vynimocne.
kartler175 (2020-10-26 08:20:45+00:00): There was no broken relation after my changeset 93014725. After this changset you left behind two broken relations. Maybe you should use JOSM not only for reverts.
MitjaJez (2020-10-26 10:43:31+00:00): I know, that's why I marked changelog with WiP - "work in progress ". Relation was wrong, mountain Storžič is in Kamnik-Savinja alps, you override this fix, that's why I reverted your changes.
kartler175 (2020-10-28 10:08:12+00:00): What's about way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424375860 ? It is member of the Alps relation, but not of any other mountain area.
And again my recommedation of JOSM for editing relations: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.89840&lat=45.75046&zoom=11&opacity=1.00&overlays=duplicate_node,single_node_in_way,ring_not_closed,ways
MitjaJez (2020-10-29 22:16:41+00:00): This way has been before there all around alps and I merging this on the same line as parts of Alps are defines.
Tnx for Inspector link, I'll do my best.
gscscnd (2020-10-26 13:57:19+00:00): Zobacz też <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office>.
tomith (2020-10-28 21:26:55+00:00): Kolego, przywróciłeś rondo Kościuszki/Parkowa które zlikwidowałem bo już jakieś pół roku nie ma tam ronda tylko światła. Proszę o posprzątanie po sobie czyli doprowadzenie do stanu zgodnego z rzeczywistością.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92725600#map=16/50.2946/18.9663
dawid1993625 (2020-10-29 10:00:53+00:00): ok ok zajmę się tym nie jestem z chorzowa nie wiedziałem tego sugerowałem się tym co widać na mapach google i innych poprawię to
dawid1993625 (2020-10-29 10:40:14+00:00): poprawiłem mam nadzieję że jest ok sory za to
tomith (2020-10-29 19:41:45+00:00): OK, dziękuję.
Na przyszłość, nie mapujemy na podstawie map google...
Frans S (2020-10-29 11:22:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mappin here.
Difficult mapping here  Lots of objects which seems to be buildings. (huts)
Please map the round objects (identified as a building) as a round hut:
Drawing a triangle over the edge of the object, tag it as Building=yes and hit the O key while selected.and  It becomes a circle.
A number of objects are no buildingsm but f.i Corrals or just cultivated land,
When there is both in and outside a shadow it is not a building but something like a corral. When there is no shadow at all, meaning it is not above groundlevel, don't map it.
Here are some examples to give you an idea what are buildings or something else

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bfsqjrbyN2rI8T3nMp5GvFymAs1zfPLu/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bb5HOnaEkQjmjoHv1dX2jbNhyJSKvKEz/view?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping
czubi (2020-10-26 16:28:40+00:00): Hallo, schön das du mithilfst bei OSM. Kannst du bitte nochmal schauen ob der Bach richtigherum fließt? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554849638#map=18/50.80965/10.77548&layers=N
Die angrenezenden Flüsse fließen nämlich genau andersrum
Man bekommt auch Fehlermeldungen dazu eingeblendet
czubi (2020-10-26 16:31:10+00:00): Ist Baggerloch der offizielle Name oder nur ein regional gebräuchlicher Name?
czubi (2020-10-26 16:31:58+00:00): Warum ist das ein Fußweg?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863584407#map=18/50.79715/10.76442&layers=N
czubi (2020-10-26 16:48:32+00:00): Der und der westl. angrenzende fließen bestimmt auch in die falsche Richtung ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573524937
ImGuRo (2020-10-26 20:16:56+00:00): Hallo czubi,
ich habe weitere Fließrichtungen von Gräben und Bächen um Wölfis herum korrigiert und hoffe alle Fehler bereinigt zu haben.

das Gebiet war im 2. Weltkrieg eine „Muna“ (Munitionslager) mit vielen Bunkern. Das Erdreich zum Schützen und Tarnen dieser Bunker wurde aus einem Loch gebaggert und das später voll Wasser lief. Dieser Teich hat sich zum Biotop und Anglerparadies entwickelt und wird seit vielen Jahrzehnten in den umliegenden Ortschaften „Baggerloch“ genannt.
Das Gebiet wurde nach dem Krieg von der „Roten Armee“ genutzt und nach der Wende von der LEG von Altmunition geräumt und die Bunker renaturiert.
ImGuRo (2020-10-26 20:18:45+00:00): Es ist ein Fussweg, weil es nicht gut mit dem PKW befahrbar ist. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863584407#map=18/50.79715/10.76442&layers=N