piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
strasz-li (2022-07-10 17:37:35+00:00): You're welcome.

It turns out that the sign we discussed about is called "Partageons la route" and has no code. It's put up (legally) by local authorities and not by the police.

To supplement what you found in Cadastre, I'll check if the track encircling Griesberg from the South is still physically there. The aerial photos of the place are outdated, as there were some works recently. Next time I pass, that is.

OSM guidelines about classifying highways are a little counter-intuitive and many people don't get them right. The way S of the crossroads really is a cycleway (it's marked by C115 and physically disabled for larger vehicles). But the segments Elzange-Inglange and Inglange-Buding might indeed require correction. I'll pay attention to the signs and exits.

Thanks, happy mapping!
SHARCRASH (2022-07-11 15:14:11+00:00): Yes, I had guessed there is such sign according your description. If it's the same as the one on you profile picture, it's the code C50 (diverse information). It can be tagged as traffic_sign=FR:C50

Recently I've had another contributor who confused tagging, even though i had warned him about the signs and how to tag. He had put the way as dedicated cycleway but the way is shared with agriculture vehicles. 

First traffic sign forbidding normal traffic + exception
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Jh4plQl4GSxZ3P_3TVjEpF4E92fso2-5

Second sign informing it is shared, the same as yours.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D6qJARRyYiG9-CXFbD0_QhU_2uzf5Hib
SHARCRASH (2022-07-11 15:24:05+00:00): Oh, and thanks for checking the way along the farm! Indeed it is quite old. I had checked the GPS Heatmap though and there is one trace going behind the farm but most go over the private property. 

Indeed it's not always easy because many people intervene and some even change the Wiki without thinking of the consequences. It's always good to discuss about interpretations in the according section.
strasz-li (2022-07-24 19:04:53+00:00): Hi! I've just checked it today and made corrections accordingly. There actually is a second crossroads - easy to miss while riding, since it's just an entry to a private possession. Not sure how to classify the last segment (it does not access the fields).
SHARCRASH (2022-07-24 20:02:58+00:00): Hi! Are you sure Eselsweg is private for everybody? Cadastre shows a parcel reserved for a way, this is most often public and why would the government give a name to a private way. It's possible that if you saw a "private" sign it is illegal, happens more and more often. As I live in Luxembourg, i think i cannot ask for that kind of information about the parcel without paying. If you're sure it's private i'd rather put them as either service or track as it was before. Not sure why you've put those portions as residential and unclassified. These highways are always public since they are considered as part of the public road network for normal traffic, a service road has far more chances to be private.

Also you've left the source:xxx tags, you should update them if you believe it's private.

I will soon repair my mountain bike, so I will soon certainly plan a tour around there and check for the first time Geisenberg, Spal, etc.
skquinn (2022-06-23 18:42:28+00:00): What is your data source for this change to the Sugar Land border, and how is it more authoritative than data I obtained directly from the City of Sugar Land itself?
martinst (2022-10-15 04:18:23+00:00): Sollte das nicht "Jagdhaus" heißen?
Glassman (2022-06-25 02:46:20+00:00): #TIP: The garden most likely should be tagged as landuse=allotments. For some background, since OSM was started in England, we use British English for tags. Apparently the Brits call their community gardens allotments. Check out https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments. If this look right, can you update your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122766546
dravenlj (2022-06-27 15:42:38+00:00): Hi there - 
Does this apply if the community garden is a collective informal effort by neighborhood individuals, including a community action center and food bank, and the garden does not use the raised beds for an allotment-type growing space? I will be happy to edit if this applies, however, I did not think allotment was the right description considering its use. (Source: I am the program coordinator)
Glassman (2022-06-27 22:29:44+00:00): You are correct it's not an allotment type of garden. I see those in Seattle all the time. The recommendation for yours would be to add the tag garden:type=community. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:garden:type
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-06-25 16:36:35+00:00): التخريب مهما حصل استرجاعه بسيط فمهما تغير في الاسم فيمكن لأي أحد من المجتمع مشاهدة التغييرات وعكسها، وهذا يسيء إليك وربما لو طال الأمر رفعنا عليك قضية وطلبنا بياناتك بجميع الحسابات لأن فعلك يدخل ضمن "نظام مكافحة جرائم المعلوماتية": https://laws.boe.gov.sa/BoeLaws/Laws/LawDetails/25df73d6-0f49-4dc5-b010-a9a700f2ec1d/1 
راجع المادة الخامسة من هذا النظام، نرجوا منكم الالتزام وعدم التأثير على هذه الخريطة التي يستفيد منها تطبيقات كثيرة وهذا التخريب له تأثير عليها
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-06-25 16:42:25+00:00): انظر أيضاً:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117972235
nasersubi (2022-06-25 16:56:47+00:00): اخي العزيز عبدالله
 انت يا انك تتحدث عن امر تجهله او انه يهمك الامر بشكل خاص ! 
اذا كنت مطلّع فعلاً وعلى درايه بالقرية والقرى المجاورة لها فهذا امر واذا كنت من غير سكان المنطقة فهذا امر اخر 

ولعلمك نظام الجرائم المعلوماتية وخصوصاً الماده الخامسة من النظام تخص المواقع الخاصة واختراقها والتعديل عليها  بشكل غير نظامي وخريطة الشارع المفتوح هذا عام ليس خاص وللجميع حق التعديل عليه 

وازيدك من الشعر بيت قبل فتره كان فيه قضيه بهذا الخصوص واعتقد انك تعرف صاحب القضية اسأله وش صار عليه 😂 

عموماً الاسترجاع مثل ماتفضلت بضغطة زر وسهل لكن الصعب هو تغيير الحقائق والشمس لاتغطى بغربال 

الغريب انك خريطة العالم كله وحاط حيلك هنا على القرى هذي 
هذا الاهتمام تحته خط ! 

المهم بسترجع البيانات وهكذا الى ماله نهاية 👻
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-06-25 18:05:57+00:00): مرحبا بك، نعم الجميع له الحق بالتعديل لكن ليس له الحق في التخريب والتعدي، وبخصوص الي تذكره فأنا لا أعرف من تقصد ولست الذي تظن فأنا مع الحقائق واللوحات على الطرق والمدارس كلها تثبت الاسم الاخر وبالصور فلماذا تقوم بتغييره وهذا ينطبق عليه النظام بأنه تخريب كما أنك تقوم بتغيير القرية وجعلها مدينة وهذا تخريب واضح ومتعمد وينطبق عليه النظام، وأدارة البيانات في الموقع DWG لديها القدرة على التعامل مع أمثالك إلى مالا نهاية فلست المخرب الأول ولا الأخير!
user_5359 (2022-06-24 09:39:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have look on http://www.osm.org/way/1072750613. What Is the meaning of the tag access_private = Caravan & Motorhome Cub?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-04 12:29:55+00:00): this edit is now being discussed at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/post-partner-confusion/128321

you are welcome to comment there!
jeslop (2022-06-24 07:47:36+00:00): Hola V1LLORA.

¿Cuál es la fuente para esos nombres y las cimas? No los he podido encontrar en las fuentes habituales, te agradecería un poco de información.

Saludos

Jesús López | OpenStreetMap Foundation | Data Working Group
martien-176 (2022-06-24 12:03:34+00:00): Hi Jacob, thanks for mapping and welcome to HOT. You requested a review of your mappings. 

The buildings you mapped are well done as to their location. But pay attention to the squareness of the corners. Always draw buildings as square as you can. Then add the Building feature type. And last, right click it and click the square icon. 

Also, you can improve by avoiding mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.

Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122768968
privetMir (2022-06-27 18:42:29+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar Premium Imagery
Msiipola (2022-06-23 19:21:41+00:00): Hi! The paths you changed position on, does not follow Lantmäteriets ortofoto, which is the most accurate image. The new positions of the changed paths have an error of 5-10 meters compare with LM. 

Images from Maxar and Esri, does not show the paths. And a GPS is not reliable, it has always a position error.

This is not big issue, but please don't change position of ways, without a reliable source.
WMush (2022-06-24 15:14:59+00:00): my changes are mostly based on the GPS data and what I saw when I was there, it's definitely better now, but indeed probably not perfect

should I revert my changes? or try to correct with better imaging alignement?
WMush (2022-06-24 15:25:52+00:00): I have to agree 1072770295 is quite off
Msiipola (2022-06-24 17:19:46+00:00): No, you don't have to any revert. I have changed back the path going east-south along the shore. Your other changes are ok.
Msiipola (2022-06-24 17:23:08+00:00): In other places where they don't have good satellite images, probably the GPS is the best source. But as GPS has errors, you probably have to trace the path several times, to get a mean value of the path.
WMush (2022-06-24 17:30:38+00:00): That's what I did in the forest, where we can't see the path from the satellite images
I will correct 1072770295 then, it's not great (west of Johannisbergs herrgård)
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-24 09:03:50+00:00): Sveikas. Farmland - tai žemės ūkio paskirtis žemėnauda. Žodžiu maži ploteliai, kur žmonės pasisodino bulves ar burokus nėra farmland.
GartenStuhl (2022-08-15 13:15:08+00:00): thanks for this fix.
kapazao (2024-02-16 07:34:01+00:00): Hola, por favor ¿podrías corregir la geometría de las aceras que añadiste en Córdoba?
Por lo general no están dibujadas en si lugar y no se ajustan a imágenes por satélite. Esto crea problemas cuando se van a editar elementos cercanos y hay que estar ajustándolas todas.
Un saludo
maraf24 (2022-07-04 21:31:21+00:00): A kto powiedział, że nie? Poprzednie łącznice nazwy miały, oficjalnie.
kubahahaha (2022-06-29 22:46:51+00:00): Idąc tym tropem powinniśmy nadać jej nazwę Zakopane, a remontowaną stację oznaczyć jako construction. Przy okazji wykorzystanie torów jest nieaktualne. Pozmieniam to wszystko jako ś jeśli nie masz nic przeciwko (i nikt tego nie zrobi wcześniej), co o tym myślisz?
Frans S (2022-08-31 13:28:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
H: Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
you mapped farmland here as buildings



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122771886
flohoff (2022-06-27 11:57:32+00:00): Hi,
was ist denn "ARCore" für eine Quelle? Sagt mir nix??

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122772309
user_5359 (2022-06-26 05:58:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1072794756. What is the meaning of the tag ROAD = YES?
Did you know, that we use the key highway for every typ of path?
flohoff (2022-06-24 09:56:05+00:00): Moin,
die changes an der Unterführung mit den lanes haben einige Routingänderungen bewirkt. Hier ein Beispiel:


https://osm.zz.de/routeqa/?rid=356912,419866

Aber ich hab da nochmal durchgeguckt. Das passt schon und die routen sind auch in Ordnung.

Nur mal so als Feedback ;)

Flo
Liquorland (2022-06-30 08:13:51+00:00): Hey,
vielen Dank für den Einblick.

LG
marczoutendijk (2022-06-25 07:54:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6099
user_5359 (2022-06-24 10:26:53+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/209666433. What s the meaning of the tags
ROAD = YES
unclassfied = yes
in combination with highway = residential?
ivanbranco (2022-06-24 17:09:19+00:00): Hi Anaximandre,

why you deleted the name tag from this place?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2749411922/history
Anaximandre (2022-06-25 15:30:25+00:00): @ivanbranco Hello, I'm so sorry, this is a mistake. I normally put everything back as before. My apologies!
jodd (2023-04-18 18:30:30+00:00): Hallo,
auch mit diesem Änderungssatz hast du wieder Gebäude eingetragen, die keine Gebäude sind. Das ist schade, weil es anderen Mappen viel Arbeit macht, hinter dir wieder aufzuräumen :-(
jodd (2023-04-18 18:34:47+00:00): Siehe hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3628070
Dino Michelini (2022-06-24 09:59:09+00:00): Ciao, nella mappatura delle relazioni CAI sei pregato di attenerti agli standard pubblicati nella pagina wiki di OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:CAI. Grazie
aceman444 (2022-07-10 07:33:30+00:00): Prosim trochu lepsie popisy sad zmien:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
user_5359 (2022-06-24 10:28:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1072819075. What ist the meaning of the tags
residential = YES
unclassfied = yes
Did you mean highway=unclassified or highway=residential?
TUMAINI APOLINARY (2022-06-29 04:17:50+00:00): Yes I mean highway=unclassified and highway=residential
user_5359 (2022-06-29 06:01:50+00:00): The key highway should have only one value! Did you clean all the ways? Did you need help?
TUMAINI APOLINARY (2022-06-29 06:15:59+00:00): Please can you explain what you mean by saying the key highway should have only one value 
And how can I clean all the way
user_5359 (2022-06-29 06:26:57+00:00): You must decide which value applies. Otherwise the path will not be displayed on the map and used in the other applications. The surrounding streets can give a corresponding hint to the value. 

I will look for your entries today and make the corrections.
TUMAINI APOLINARY (2022-06-29 06:34:36+00:00): Ooh, thanks so much I like , Your comments I was wondering why can't I see the changes and contribution am doing on Openstreetmap
TUMAINI APOLINARY (2022-06-29 06:38:20+00:00): But I was using JOSM when am doing mapping
GinaroZ (2022-06-23 23:50:54+00:00): thanks but not quite right :)
Ropino (2022-08-16 17:31:11+00:00): Hi,
Bitte prüfen und anpassen:
highway=*
'*' ist kein sinnvoller Wert
Danke.
user_5359 (2022-06-24 10:35:24+00:00): Hello (again)! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1072824993. What is the meaning of the tags
unclassfied = YES
unclassified = YES
?
Did you need help for the tagging??
ALu68 (2022-06-23 21:05:57+00:00): Hallo S4JVDEQB,

bevor du mit dem Mapping weitermachst, solltest du estmal ins Wiki schauen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features

Insbesondere was in OSM Namen sind:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name
und die Seite "Lifecycle prefix"  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Gruß. Andre
Bierphysik (2022-07-18 21:13:49+00:00): Warum hast Du https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9842660825 hinzugefügt? Da gibs doch schon https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1618132191?
MxxCon (2022-06-24 03:05:57+00:00): Hello.
When mapping features, please try not attach/glue/snap unrelated features to each other unless they are actually attached. That makes it harder in the future to edit them. In this case there's no need for these 2 bike racks to be attached to the neighborhood area polygon. 🙂
It might be a little bit more hassle when editing, but something to look out for. 👍
I fixed it up for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122776038
paulbrunner (2022-06-24 14:45:36+00:00): Hi. Thanks for the heads up and for fixing it for me! I'll have an eye on it from now on.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122776038
plennert (2023-01-03 11:34:40+00:00): for node 9842706135
is there a sign indicating which buildings this connection is for?
MxxCon (2022-06-24 03:07:58+00:00): Hello.
You tagged one of the buildings here as a storage tank. Is that accurate? From the satellite imagery it appears to be a regular building..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122776193
Langlaeufer (2022-06-24 05:46:38+00:00): Ist track wirklich so passend? Die Wege sind vermutlich nicht vorranging für den forstwirtschaftlichen Verkehr gedacht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122776333
jguddas (2022-06-25 10:41:23+00:00): Stimmt, hab da jetzt beim Königinnendenkmal aufgeräumt.
Langlaeufer (2022-06-25 13:32:05+00:00): 👍
mcliquid (2022-06-26 15:10:23+00:00): As you wish: "Please don’t “correct” the objects I have mapped. The error most certainly lies in the validator you are using, not in the data. In any case of doubt, contact me instead of fiddling with the data."

This was is not connected with the nearby track. Is that the way it is supposed to be from you?https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1072835100

Greetings
fkv (2022-06-26 15:25:48+00:00): Sorry, I left that gap by accident. Thanks for the message. I've now connected the ways.
Đuro Jiří (2022-06-24 11:32:29+00:00): Scusa, hai aggiunto "Water source" senza tag. Ho inserito tag "water point".Devi aggiungere anche tag, altrimenti non si capisce nulla..
NKA (2022-06-24 00:09:12+00:00): Noen innspill til taggingen her:

* cycleway:... = exclusive brukes ikke i Norge

* Man bør ikke bruke -1 sammen med oneway. Bruk i stedet cyclway:left=lane

* Vi bør ikke ha egen tagging for sykkelveier i Oslo, så oslo_standard:cyclway må fjernes. Om dere har spesielle behov må tagging av slikt diskuteres på forumet.

Kom gjerne innom IRC så får du hjelp.

Ellers: Ikke bruke Bing i Norge, den har betydelig offset.
Glassman (2022-06-25 02:37:49+00:00): #TIP: Add a tag to describe the type of business. I went ahead and used craft=metal_construction.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122777500
Glassman (2022-06-25 02:38:05+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122777500
SomeoneElse (2022-06-23 23:29:05+00:00): Also near Heworth, from survey 05/06, tr8905b
mariotomo (2022-06-24 15:03:27+00:00): hi. have any chance you can share the source for the 'ref'?
whatmeinfallible (2022-06-24 22:35:50+00:00): Greetings Mariotomo,
This ref tag was added in order to fill a gap in ref tag data along this highway. There is no ground footage of ref signage here, but this ref tag has been present on adjacent segments since about 2018. Do you have any resources suggesting the tag is incorrect?
Thanks for reaching out.
mariotomo (2022-06-25 00:24:44+00:00): proof it's incorrect, no. 
evidence of any ref in the country, none at all apart for ref=1.
mariotomo (2022-06-25 00:27:01+00:00): every user I've asked about the ref they were adding, all answered as you just did.
Dodko (2022-06-24 16:05:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3927081583
ak je ihrisko na správnom mieste značku fixme=overit polohu môžete vymazať

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1072859977
na chodníku je značka že je aj pre bicykle? vtedy sa značí podľa https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=path
dole sú príklady
tigeral (2022-06-24 16:38:07+00:00): Ďakujeme za váš komentár a odkaz na príklad značka.

Pri vstupe na ihrisko nie je žiadna značka. Tie. je "A generic multi-use path open to non-motorized vehicles, implicitly allowed for pedestrians, cyclists, …"

Ihrisko je pre značku na správnom mieste.
> fixme=overit polohu môžete vymazať
Prepáčte, som nový. Môžem upraviť aktuálnu "changeset" alebo musím vytvoriť novú?

Túto fotku ihriska som urobil dnes.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/ZqSfMhaHwXbSwQBv5
Dodko (2022-06-24 16:47:56+00:00): Uzavretý changeset sa už nemení, treba otvoriť novú sadu zmien.
tigeral (2022-06-24 17:05:54+00:00): Urobil. Ďakujem za vašu pomoc.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122811545
Dodko (2022-06-24 17:09:45+00:00): Chodník bol dobre, len to bicycle=yes som myslel, ale už som ho dal späť.
CorruptComputer (2022-06-24 01:09:08+00:00): I should have also specified this in the changeset. 

The lake (way/463018844) is visible in "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" imagery, but this was taken before anything here was built. Look at any of the newer imagery and you'll clearly see that this doesn't exist anymore.
Stereo (2022-07-25 03:36:03+00:00): Hi 3qH4! Be careful, you dropped some street names here.
user_5359 (2022-06-26 05:38:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1072885377. What is the meaning of the foreign tags
Field lawn = Recreational physical activities for kids
Landuse = Grass
Swing Set = For children swing on
Toboggan Ride = For children to play
?
Is this a indoor or outdoor playground??
Enock4seth (2022-11-08 11:06:46+00:00): Hi, avoid mapping ghost round buildings such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1072889759 and others you have mapped here.
DUGA (2024-01-20 20:34:42+00:00): It is inappropriate to map private swimming pools with dated imagery and wrong access type.
user_14547832 (2022-08-30 15:49:15+00:00): Note: Bel Air Village only appears in Bing's Imagery.
Any other Imagery does not have Bel Air Village.
Fizzie-DWG (2022-07-22 03:32:37+00:00): Hi GC! Thanks very much for your efforts in updating the map! A couple of small points to note though, thanks. The easiest & neatest way to number a complex like this is just to add the street address ie 22 Hansford Road to the area, not to each unit. Each unit can then just be tagged as Unit number xxx in the unit field. & also please don't abbreviate street types - they have to be entered as Road, Street, Avenue etc, not Rd, St or Ave, otherwise they come up as errors. Thanks!
Joseph Crowell (2022-07-26 05:02:06+00:00): Hey Frizzy! I've corrected these today.
Fizzie-DWG (2022-07-26 05:30:07+00:00): Thanks! (& that's how it works! :-))
tastrax (2022-06-24 12:07:03+00:00): Welcome to ID Editor and OpenStreetMap. When adding buildings its best to try and make the outline as close to the building as possible. You can also 'square' the corners of the buildings by using the Q key on the keyboard after assigning the building tag. Have fun mapping!
Frans S (2022-08-26 10:00:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).

C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.

H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122781236
kartler175 (2022-06-25 09:38:47+00:00): Please fix https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-62.58266&lat=45.67293&zoom=16&opacity=0.95