piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
niveditha_polu (2021-06-15 15:33:37+00:00): Hi mueschel,
Thanks for flagging. It was an accidental upload. Reverted the Changeset here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106410689
mueschel (2021-06-16 08:29:14+00:00): Thanks. There are still more than 1000 nodes added by various people:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/18pA
Becky Candy (2021-06-15 09:45:24+00:00): Reverted 106353581,seems to has broken the highway running thru this project into 400+ untagged points
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106388284
rab (2021-06-15 10:42:06+00:00): Not bad, still some more work to do:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8833689884
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/435909059
Becky Candy (2021-06-15 10:51:40+00:00): Now fixed,thank you
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106388284
skyper (2021-06-24 15:41:33+00:00): Hi TUBSmail
Your change broke some route relations. Please, always download all parent relations before splitting a way. JOSM should offer you that action automatically with the stable version. Please update JOSM.

Did fix it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106909763

Regards skyper
skyper (2021-06-24 21:12:58+00:00): Hey
Sorry, my bad. JOSM does not offer this action automatically. You need to take care of it by yourself.
ivanbranco (2021-07-13 13:00:21+00:00): Ciao Orles, hai modificato una cabina telefonica in bar ma mantenendo entrambi i tag, puoi controllare? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3350042107/history
VGPGR (2024-02-12 12:49:12+00:00): Υπάρχουν λάθος αποτύπωση στον χάρτη. 
Παρακαλώ για την διόρθωση του.
SunnyIsland10 (2024-02-12 22:13:17+00:00): Greetings VGPGR:

Thank you for reaching out. I saw you commented on my colleague Karoo02’s changeset. They are no longer active so I will be handling this on their behalf. I would appreciate if you could provide a way or node ID you have in mind so I can investigate the area.

Happy mapping

--Automatic Translation--
Χαιρετισμούς VGPGR:

Σας ευχαριστούμε που απευθυνθήκατε. Είδα ότι σχολίασες το σύνολο αλλαγών του συναδέλφου μου Karoo02. Δεν είναι πλέον ενεργοί, επομένως θα το χειριστώ για λογαριασμό τους. Θα εκτιμούσα αν μπορούσατε να παρέχετε έναν τρόπο ή ένα αναγνωριστικό κόμβου που έχετε κατά νου, ώστε να μπορέσω να ερευνήσω την περιοχή.

Καλή χαρτογράφηση
Vinber-Pro (2021-06-16 07:43:05+00:00): je pense qu'il faut expliquer davantage ce que tu fais. Ici tu passes de nombreux parkings parking=street_side
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106389399
GinaroZ (2021-06-15 10:16:53+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit.
Is this retail development now open? If so the landuse=construction should be removed, and Home Bargains could be tagged as shop=variety_store.
adrianojbr (2021-06-16 14:31:11+00:00): Why remove parking aisle for service ways?
Poblenou3 (2021-06-16 21:47:38+00:00): Hello adrianojbr. The policy to remove parking_aisle service tags on the outer service ways only as their main function is circulating traffic (and retain on inner parking bays) was mentioned on Brazil's telegram channel (https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade) in the fall of 2020. We are following that guidance. Have a good day.

Olá adrianojbr. A política de remover as etiquetas de serviço parking_aisle nas vias externas apenas porque sua função principal é circular o tráfego (e reter nas vagas internas) foi mencionada no canal de telegramas do Brasil (https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade) no outono de 2020 Estamos seguindo essa orientação. Tenha um bom dia.
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 14:56:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108565276, 108568002 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mixture of edits that includes fantasy mapping and border vandalism.  Numerous attempts to engage with the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5233 et al.
user_2066394 (2021-06-15 11:25:29+00:00): Da hättte man doch den vorhandenen Umriss kleiner ziehen können und neu abrunden?
fx99 (2021-06-18 08:32:20+00:00): Hy, this imports duplicates tons of structures that have already been there before. Are you going to fix it or revert the import?
Unbeatable101 (2021-06-18 14:50:53+00:00): Oh sorry, I forgot to download the whole area I was importing to so didn't notice, I'm fixing it now
Lee Carré (2021-06-15 12:36:04+00:00): Why, exactly?

Both are recognised and they're semantically different.
mueschel (2021-06-15 12:49:03+00:00): Well, yes, there is a Wiki page about "todo".
But there are several good reasons for "fixme":

- "todo" is marked as deprecated

- Wiki says "todo=* has minimal support, usage etc."

- "fixme" is used far more often and supported by much more tools

- "todo" with a suffix / subkey is almost never used while it's common for "fixme:XY"

Sementically, having a 'fixme' tag here doesn't seem wrong to me and it has the additional advantage to be visible in many editors and QA tools. More users aware of the problem means there are better chances to have it corrected.
Lee Carré (2021-06-16 22:24:43+00:00): Thanks for the explanation.

Especially that more editors / QA tools will handle a fixme but ignore a todo, I'll endeavour to use fixme instead, in future.

I'll have to see about cleaning up all the other todo entries I've made, elsewhere.
Lee Carré (2021-06-15 12:30:48+00:00): 👍

Vespucci didn't know this info for auto-populating the fields (unless it comes from presets anyway, which should be updated), and while out surveying I seldom have the spare resources to run a browser along with everything else.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:22:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-23 09:35:43+00:00): Have you surveyed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156856852/history ?

Or have you added shop tags based on just name match (despite it can be an office or closed shop - and this one is very likely closed)
Robert Whittaker (2021-08-23 11:18:56+00:00): Oops. This wasn't from a survey. I think I would have been using iD's (often over-zealous) "upgrade tags" feature, to add missing brand tags to several outlets here. I'm usually pretty careful when using it, and check the individual changes it's about to make. I guess I missed the fact it was adding a shop=* to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156856852 when it previously previously didn't have one. Oops.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-08-23 13:12:52+00:00): Great that this is fixed (not sure are you on talk-gb list but it was mentioned there).

Well, I can just say that I predicted this :) See https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/6517
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:36:35+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:36:44+00:00): Привет и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!

Не могли бы вы объяснить, какой у вас источник для ваших дополнений? Я уверен, что добавленные вами имена не видны на аэрофотоснимках.

С уважением,
Энди
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-15 23:05:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106426588 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some commercial spam in the US.
ravali_78 (2021-06-16 03:44:41+00:00): Hi Charizard23,
I have fixed the level crossing to the residential highway.Kindly check with way 610240368,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106430728.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106392919
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-15 23:05:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106426588 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some commercial spam in the US.
Dodko (2021-07-18 20:34:59+00:00): Otváracie hodiny C - KLUB PIZZA treba zadávať v anglickom formáte, inak to nevedia spracovať mapy.
Pomôcka je táto stránka https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
trial (2021-06-15 10:44:52+00:00): Sorry for the big bounding box, my intention was to split into small changesets
subflux (2021-06-16 08:48:16+00:00): >fibre is the correct British term. Not fiber which is American 

You've made changes way outside Britain here, though, so unless I'm misunderstanding - what has that to do with a regional spelling?
trial (2021-06-16 10:41:59+00:00): Indeed, you misunderstood the comment as it has nothing to do with regional spellings as such. I thought it was well known, but I may be wrong: British is the language used for OSM tags. That's why the correct value is fibre (pronounced fiber ;-)).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:telecom:medium%3Dfibre
About one century ago, British and Americans unified their spelling. British decided to use the original spelling (here fibre, coming from French fibre) and Americans the way it's pronounced (fiber). So no mix of fibre and fiber anymore, but depending of the language, only fibre or only fiber. Therefore here fibre.
Likewise the tag for color is colour, not color.
Lee Carré (2021-06-18 17:18:35+00:00): @trial

Most interesting. Thanks for that explanation. I had wondered why I was seeing colour spelled with a U, and so on.
trial (2021-06-18 19:28:23+00:00): @Lee, as you probably know OpenStreetMap was invented in UK, therefore the language.
Lee Carré (2021-07-01 03:03:52+00:00): I actually didn't know; assumed it was German in origin (many noteworthy projects come from there).

+1 for the UK, then.

Makes a change. With it being Wimbledon season, again, I'm reminded that Brits are good at inventing sports that we lose at (tennis, badminton, football, rugby, sailing, golf (I think), cricket, probably more(!)).

Odd, then, that Yankland terms (sidewalk) and some spellings (kerb instead of curb) are common, instead of the British (dare I say English; origin of the language) versions.
Perhaps it was decided that the likes of pavement and curb were somewhat ambiguous. {Shrug}
4004 (2021-06-21 00:39:17+00:00): все также без понятия, как вы так ударно все добавляете, но одна поправка: разделитель диапазонов похоже ; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:flats?uselang=en
VitoScaletta (2021-06-23 21:46:44+00:00): Пасиб буду знать, поправил.
trial (2021-06-15 10:47:02+00:00): Sorry for the big bounding box, my intention was to split into small changesets .And for a revert, it's too late - would produce another big bounding box.
SekeRob (2021-06-15 11:38:20+00:00): Hi,

At least you put a proper comment in your JOSM edit (and with e.g. trans ocean cables hardly avoidable to generate larger boxes). The number of JOSM edits with generic default texts are endless, not to speak of Wheelchair... Never, and I know I can detail while trying that mapping vehicle. Then there are those who do many, high change count edits and just comment 'fixes X' or 'systemization Y'. I'll slap it all in the non-appreciative of how this shows in local edit history listing views, but other thoughts have crossed my mind.
If I cant fit a more detailed description in the comment box, and I'm verbose, periodically annotate what I'm doing in the comment box, I'll stop, close and start a new one but when a single node touches on a 2000 mile bus route, sorry, and then if the route was broken already, get to become co-owner in the Neis/Osmose reports such as today. That's life.
Happy mapping.
Lee Carré (2021-06-15 12:07:47+00:00): @SekeRob
👍

I'm interested in only a small jurisdiction (since I do surveying, not ‘armchair-mapping’), and quite frequently there are changesets with bounding boxes that span my island which contain zero relevant changes for my area (much like this changeset).

Would be nice if the likes of OSMCha could filter them out.

Alas; people muddle through (instead of reading documentation first). At least they're contributing here, and not to Google.

It's a social problem, not a technical one; just keep badgering them.

Though, the common editors could do something to discourage newbie contributors from making wide-spanning changesets early on. iD has a tutorial, for example. Or, there should be warnings in the UI re setting the source=* comment=* and likewise encouraging smaller areas per changeset.

The likes of WheelMap seem to be going for efficiency, over concision.
SekeRob (2021-06-15 14:19:32+00:00): ID editor has a colour changing counter right top. When turning Orange certainly time to switch to comments, fix any flagged issuea and save. For self it makes the resolutions manageble. Allows a quicker review then ust start a new one if not done.
trial (2021-06-15 19:43:21+00:00): @SekeRob
👍. With JOSM I thought - but it's now proven to be a wrong assumption - that sending in chunk would split the changeset into different changesets. Next time I'll sort my 0verpass request by region - default - and limit the output size, push the changeset then, 5 min after that, proceed with next chunk. This should work. For transatlantic cables, except if the cable links France and Brazil, it should modify less countries. 
@Lee Carré, indeed, no modification in Jersey, I don't know if you have fibre but at least you write it the British way! OSMcha can be improved, for instance by checking the BBOX of each modified/added/deleted object instead of the global BBOX. It would be more computation intensive but for large BBOX with sparse data like this it would be very helpful. Well, https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=106393896#2/27.2/3.8 shows it fast
Lee Carré (2021-06-17 01:33:30+00:00): @trial

“sending in chunk would split the changeset into different changesets”

I imagine that this isn't done so that contributors can have control over when one set ends and another begins.

It does seem better to not penalise responsible use by pandering to the clueless.

I actually wish there was a way to keep a set open longer than 2 hours. It would've helped me avoid submitting similar sets (when all the changes in one would've been better).

But, there's always trade-offs.

“I don't know if you have fibre”
Oh yes; much fanfare was made about that becoming the norm.

Even though it only happened because the incumbent telco got a phat subsidy from the state (or, rather, our tax money), and liked the idea of lower-maintenance meaning that they could fire a bunch of engineers.

As long as you're willing to shell out for it, you can have a FttP (read: low-latency) link with capacity up to 1Gbps ingress and (if I recall) 100Mbps egress.
Of course, the _minimum_ tariff also just happened to go up from what it used to be via DSL (read: £17.50 per month) to something that is overkill for anyone tech-savvy who knows how to do things efficiently (I grew up on dial-up, which should say enough about that) which just so happens to come at the price of more like £25 per month.

Also, lots of capacity, but very modest byte-count quotas (but then, being an island, submarine cables are expensive). Though, I'll admit that the speed (low-latency) is quite nice.

For the details, the webshite of the incumbent is http://www.jtglobal.com/

“at least you write it the British way!”
Well, given where I am …

Though Jersey isn't technically / officially part of Britain (though still under the Crown); Rule Britannia and all that. Besides, I speak English, not Yankish.

“OSMcha can be improved, for instance by checking the BBOX of each modified/added/deleted object instead of the global BBOX. It would be more computation intensive but for large BBOX with sparse data like this it would be very helpful.”
Ah, I see. I did imagine that there'd be a reason why, involving some trade-off.

More compute resources; a bag which no-one wants to be left holding.

Oh well, more nagging of thoughtless newbies it is.

“Well, https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=106393896#2/27.2/3.8 shows it fast”
Thanks for the pointer; being an OSM novice I'm still discovering the various funky tools.
Lee Carré (2021-06-18 17:26:37+00:00): Pro-Tip™:

OSMCha is already capable of filtering out the noise of large bounding boxes. I've been tinkering with it.

Besides selecting location of interest, also set the BBOX parameter to cover the area you care about, and set the BBOX factor to something close to 1 (that is, filter out anything with a BBOX larger than N times the BBOX you just specified above).

The matching changesets count went down from 4-5k to ~1k (for the date-range and other parameters I had input). Only local changes listed, all the noise (e.g. wheelmap) had been filtered out.

Enjoy.
trial (2021-06-18 19:32:27+00:00): @Lee, thanks for the tip but, nevertheless, after having found a bad import "thanks" to the big bounding box, I'm happy not having known the tip before ;-). Eventually the import has been reverted and will probably be done later a proper way. The guy wasn't aware of the issues and was OK for the revert.
Lee Carré (2021-07-01 03:36:21+00:00): At least there's some kind of silver-lining to the giant mid-orange boxes.

One motivation to more harshly filter was that there's relatively little activity in my locale, so the jumbo-boxes were causing very low signal-to-noise. Around half the changeset list entries were simply irrelevant. Too much mental filtering.

But, also means missing out on interesting conversations like this one.
Pavelfantik (2021-06-23 21:39:17+00:00): очень странные правки. почему так получилось?
VitoScaletta (2021-06-23 21:43:06+00:00): ну вот потому что такие там квартиры в подъездах, такой дом. Лично был там и смотрел номера квартир.
Hugoren Martinako (2021-07-16 08:04:54+00:00): Buenas,
Aunque una carretera, al atravesar un pueblo, tenga nombre y seguramente más cosas, no pasa a ser residencial.
Hay que evitar romper las continuidad de las carreteras, puesto que es por donde se redirigirá el tráfico de los navegadores.
jeslop (2021-07-16 08:22:35+00:00): Hola Hugoren. ¿Me puedes especificar a que carretera te refieres? Suelo tener mucho cuidado con esas cosas, se puede ver en los conjuntos de cambios. Probablemente haya sido una falta de atención por mi parte a la hora de recortar el tramo en JOSM. Saludos.
Hugoren Martinako (2021-07-16 09:10:16+00:00): Sí, mira, ya he corregido dos que me han aparecido a mi, por ejemplo esta de Onzonilla: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108099349
También en el San Martín del Camino. Como esas las tenía yo también, las he corregido, pero puede ser que haya más. Puedes usar esta lista para ver las tuyas: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/es/byuser/jeslop?username=jeslop&item=1120

Un saludo
jeslop (2021-07-16 10:02:58+00:00): Ok. Ya veo. La próxima vez andaré con ocho ojos en vez de cuatro. Gracias por el aviso.
user_1566574 (2021-07-01 11:50:09+00:00): Salut !
À en croire les recommandation pour la clé duration=* (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:duration), il est préférable d'utiliser deux-points « : » plutôt que « h ».

Merci pour tes ajouts néanmoins ! :D
DeuteriumTritium (2021-07-01 17:31:17+00:00): Bonjour,
c'est noté et corrigé.
Merci.
literan (2021-06-15 15:59:15+00:00): это не 1-й Нагатинский проезд, не надо придумывать
dgitto (2021-06-16 04:19:54+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM
MxxCon (2021-06-15 20:51:51+00:00): Hello.
You used a map of Colorado State University to map Brooklyn College?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106395113
kondokum (2021-06-16 05:21:19+00:00): Hi Mxxcon, Thanks for looking into my edits. That was a miss from my end. I was mapping Colorado State University map earlier and mis-placed that URL over here. Apologies, for the miss. The map I used to edit is:https://www.brooklyn.cuny.edu/web/abo_misc/CampusMap.pdf

 Regards,
kondokum
IlBano (2021-06-15 16:12:35+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto/a in OSM.
Vorrei portare alla tua attenzione un paio di elementi utili per mappare correttamente secondo le regole della comunità:
- quando carichi una modifica riporta sempre un commento al changeset in modo che gli altri mappatori sappiamo cosa è stato modificato (es. in questo caso "Aggiunto parco giochi e 2 esercizi commerciali")
- non puoi usare per le informazioni che inserisci dati provenienti da fonti protette da copyright. Google, che hai specificato come source, vieta espressamente il riuso dei suoi dati e quindi non è utilizzabile.

Grazie

Ciao

IlBano
Lee Carré (2021-06-16 07:01:38+00:00): You removed the entire todo tag, which included multiple tasks, yet only addressed the first of them.

Should've edited the value, instead.
Warin61 (2021-06-16 07:15:58+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM. 

"High water mark" is a description not a name. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Roles in a multipolygon are either 'inner' or 'outer' ... not High water Mark.
Foxydoug (2021-06-16 07:56:33+00:00): Thanks however in this case it is  important  that users know this line. The shire has created a RV camping zone that is below the line hence subject to periodic flooding. I would appreciate suggestions as my OSM proficiency is low
Warin61 (2021-06-17 08:03:09+00:00): Why not map the camping area? Add opening_hours="Closed when water high" ? 

Is the water fairly permanent or is it intermittent? If intermittent then add to the water the tag intermittent=yes.
tenzul (2021-08-08 22:27:30+00:00): Hey brasenase,

es wäre hilfreich, wenn du sinnvolle Änderungskommentare angibst. Zum Beispiel "Setze Tempolimits in Frutenhof". Dann weiß jeder gleich was du gemacht hast. Wenn du nur "Änderung" schreibst, hat niemand etwas davon. 
Ich wünsche dir viel Spaß beim Mappen!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106398568
RicoElectrico (2021-06-15 14:12:25+00:00): Ta droga wcale nie istnieje w terenie, zdjęcie z dzisiaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2714611

Do skasowania.
RicoElectrico (2021-06-15 14:13:49+00:00): I z drugiej strony też nic nie ma.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2714625
user_8120638 (2021-06-15 17:39:53+00:00): Błądzisz w oparach absurdu tu są dwie ulice Henryka Brodatego i Mieszka II Lamberta oto one w załączonym linku http://gazetawiecborska.eu/aktualnosci/2021/06/ulice-henryka-brodatego-i-czesc-ulicy-mieszka-ii-lamberta-w-wiecborku-zostaly-wytyczone-po-17-latach-bezczynnosci-radnych-i-burmistrza/
user_8120638 (2021-06-15 17:43:04+00:00): Ta droga istnieje od 17 lat i jest ponownie wytyczana na gruncie