piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 16:12:56+00:00): It is.    

https://www.chesapeakebay.net/issues/wetlands

"What types of wetlands are found in the Chesapeake Bay region?
A wetland is defined by its soils and vegetation. Some wetlands may be saturated with water throughout the year, while others are not always visibly wet. All wetlands are dominated by “hydrophytes”—plants that are adapted for life in wet soils—and have hydric soils, meaning they are periodically saturated or flooded.

Two broad categories of wetlands are found in the Chesapeake Bay watershed:

Tidal, or estuarine, wetlands are flooded with salt or brackish water when tides rise. Tidal wetlands are found along the shores of the Bay and the tidal portions of streams, creeks and rivers. As of 2010, there were approximately 282,291 acres of tidal wetlands in the Chesapeake Bay area.
Non-tidal, or palustrine, wetlands contain fresh water and make up 86 percent of the wetlands in the watershed. Palustrine wetlands are located on floodplains bordering streams and rivers, along the shorelines of lakes and ponds or covering broad, flat areas where water may collect (such as many areas on the Delmarva peninsula).
Wetlands can be further distinguished by the varieties of plants that grow there:

Emergent wetlands, often called marshes or wet meadows, are made up of grasses, sedges and other leafy, non-woody plants. 
Shrub wetlands, known as bogs or shrub swamps, are characterized by low- to medium-height woody plants. 
Forested wetlands, including wooded swamps and low-lying hardwood forests near rivers, are dominated by trees. Sixty-eight percent of the wetlands in the Bay watershed are forested."
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 16:13:17+00:00): 290k of wetlands that needs to be added...
TravGW (2019-05-13 16:31:00+00:00): Map found here. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html
TravGW (2019-05-13 16:31:08+00:00): Map found here. https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html
Viajero Perdido (2019-05-15 04:42:29+00:00): Hi edathy.

Please be careful to not delete forest polygons when editing - large areas suddendly became white.  I've repaired the damage here.

I've noticed you removed some lakes, then added them again.  Better would be to redraw the existing object; that keeps the history.

Regards, VP
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-14 05:51:46+00:00): Hi angelwakayu, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting almost 500 buildings? Thanks.

More information about this changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70201236

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
FransWillem (2019-08-06 07:35:02+00:00): Hello Daniel Thanks for mapping here.  I review mappings done by 'beginner' mappers.
A few remarks

Please square all buildings you map with the Q key in iD editor in future mappings. You can also keep the Q key pressed down and select the buildings each after  each other (except the round buildings) You squared nearly half of the buildings you have mapped.
Your mapping are rather inaccurate.
Please follow the outlines of the building as precise as possible. Zoom in till 20 mtr or level 20 for detailed mapping.
Do not follow the outlines of trees where the roofs are covered. Please extrapolate the line of the roofs.
Best regards
viloan (2019-05-13 16:57:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Wilmer Osario (2019-05-17 01:56:56+00:00): Así no se debe agregar los bosques 😐
MaestroGlanz (2019-05-17 04:44:41+00:00): Why?
Wilmer Osario (2019-06-10 16:50:47+00:00): ℹ️ Recientemente usted realizo una serie de ediciones donde intentaba cartografiar toda la masa forestal del Amazonas, en gran parte de los estados “Bolívar” y “Amazonas” del sur de Venezuela.

◾️ El primer problema con sus ediciones, es que visiblemente son de tan baja precisión que pone en duda la veracidad del mapa, teniendo como consecuencia una grave desinformación cartográfica en las zonas que cubre todos sus polígonos etiquetados con [natural=wood]:

--------------(📷 Imágenes 📷)-----------------

https://wguayana.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/osm008.jpg

https://wguayana.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/osm010.jpg

----------------------------------------------------

◾️ Un mapa como ese sería bueno para vistas muy altas del planeta, pero son muy perjudiciales al estar en zooms más bajos, especialmente cuando se intente visualizar algún poblado dentro del área de sus polígonos.

◾️ Los polígonos de natural=wood necesitan ser mucho más precisos que como usted los estaba colocando.

◾️ Al cubrir toda esa gran área de polígonos contiguos indiscriminadamente, se está perdiendo una valiosa información geográfica que en muchas zonas ya estaba cartografiada.

ℹ️ Otro grave problema es, que al trazar indiscriminadamente polígonos para que queden “encima” de todo lo que haya, se apreciaban graves problemas al solaparse los [natural=wood] con otros elementos naturales. Generando ese grave error en todos los ríos y [natural=water] de grandes zonas de Venezuela, Colombia y Brasil:

----------------(📷 Imagen 📷)-----------------

https://wguayana.files.wordpress.com/2019/06/osm-error-agua2.jpg

----------------------------------------------------

ℹ️ Otro error que usted estaba cometiendo, era cartografiar una muy amplia zona usando pequeños polígonos individuales, cuando lo ideal es utilizar una Relación que cubra toda el área.

◾️ Trazando líneas individuales alrededor de toda la masa forestal que quiere agregar, y luego agrupándola toda en una Relación, donde sus líneas del contorno tengan el rol de “outer”.

◾️ De esa manera, sería más fácil para otros usuarios agregar más detalle a toda la masa forestal que usted ha cartografiado; y los diversos programas que gestionan la base de datos de OSM tienen menos problemas al tener que procesar 1 característica, envés de 300 polígonos individuales:

----------------(📷 Imagen 📷)-----------------

https://wguayana.files.wordpress.com/2019/05/osm011.jpg

----------------------------------------------------
mariotomo (2023-08-11 05:16:22+00:00): beautiful answer. have you considered reworking this into a diary entry? (it would receive more visibility). or a community topic? (the platform would provide automatic translation for all readers).
MaestroGlanz (2023-08-11 17:31:55+00:00): Beside the fact, that this is total nonsense. Simply claiming "this is right" and "this is wrong", doesn't make it right or wrong. The tiles have several advantages. One of them is, that they can be edited in ID, another one being, that the map tiler has a limited dataset for the calculation of one map tile. Otherwise the map tiler must evaluate a 10.000 point polygon for a map tile of 1x1km. That makes no sense. What Wilmer Osario claims, makes neither from a mapping perspective, nor from a technical perspective sense. But he deleted without (!) discussion and without (!) asking anyting hours of work. I refrain from writing, what I think about this person.
And furthermore: The mapazonia people agreed with my method of mapping. The only improvement would be diamond tiles with four outer lines, each member of two polygon relations.
mariotomo (2023-08-12 06:12:05+00:00): fact is: you edited as a remote mapper into a country where locals agree with each other on how to do things. did you get in contact with the local community?, apart from asking the DWG to block the editor in question? Wilmer claims that you have ignored the previously mapped entities. Wilmer undid your contributions, which you confirm they were massive, and undiscussed with the local community. what did you expect? 
in the four years that have passed, have you tried to join the local Venezuelan community, to fine tune your mapping activity to match their expectations?
MaestroGlanz (2023-08-12 07:35:13+00:00): Yes, I got in touch, as I mentioned. I also got in touch with the DWG and one of them talked to him diplomatically (forgot, what it was). I didn't ignore previously mapped entitites. Also wrong. There were some national reserves, that were double tagged as forests, which is a bad idea. If I need a cut out from the forest, I cut out the national reserve. So, I separated it. I was mainly mapping in Brazil, touched Venezuela only a bit. 
There was nothing, which was removed from the map. Removing massive contributions without change set discussion is absolutely unacceptable. I would never (!) do that. Never.
And up to this day: Not a single person in Brazil though, it is necessary to remove any contribution, I made 4 years ago. They still all exist.
Why did I not get in contact with the Venezuelian community? What for? I gave up on Venezuela. I won't map there. Simple as that.
MaestroGlanz (2023-08-12 07:37:21+00:00): And additionally to that, Wilmer didn't remove my contributions after the DWG-guy talked to him. Not even the ones in Venezuela.
DD1GJ (2019-05-24 07:12:22+00:00): Die Adressen wurden wg. unzulässiger Quelle entfernt
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 10:20:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70832175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2771.
sdoerr (2019-05-14 06:52:47+00:00): Has Rochester Airport really changed its name to Rochester Airfield?
Jan Olieslagers (2019-05-14 07:17:18+00:00): Dear, I consider it improper to call such an aerodrome an "airport" - in general, only US'ans do this, apparently unable to differentiate. However, if you have an official source for Rochester to be called an "airport" then please feel free to revert.
Kind regards, Karel ADAMS
sdoerr (2019-05-14 21:49:39+00:00): OK, on the basis of https://rochesterairport.co.uk/ I'm going to revert the name to Rochester Airport.
Jan Olieslagers (2019-05-15 04:21:24+00:00): Fair enough, Sir. Thanks for polite discussion, and for first talking then acting.
Kindly yours, Karel ADAMS
Wulfmorn (2019-05-13 21:42:21+00:00): Hi, I am currently working on resolving the issues in this area, which I caused, somehow.
Wulfmorn (2019-05-13 22:09:39+00:00): I dont know what you did, but its taking me hours to fix. Please do not dissolve the multipolygons!
highflyer74 (2019-05-17 14:16:07+00:00): Hello!

-You are still not adding proper changeset comments. "cambios central team" is not enough to let others know what has been done. 

-You still add roads that have names that consist of geographic coordinates or are written in capital letters.

- You are still not telling us your data source.

- Your profile still does not say anything about your obviously commercial background and how you are organized.

Please adhere to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

----------------------------------------------

Hola!

-Usted todavía no está agregando comentarios apropiados sobre el conjunto de cambios. El "cambios central team" no es suficiente para que los demás sepan lo que se ha hecho. 

-Todavía se añaden carreteras que tienen nombres que consisten en coordenadas geográficas o que están escritos en mayúsculas.

- Usted todavía no nos está diciendo su fuente de datos.

- Su perfil todavía no dice nada acerca de sus antecedentes obviamente comerciales y de cómo está organizado.

Por favor adhiérase a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
mueschel (2019-05-26 16:30:15+00:00): Hallo Wuthnex,
willkommen bei OSM!
Wie ich sehe trägst du an einigen Kreuzungen Abbiegespuren ein. 
z.B. hier: https://osm.org/go/0HhLQbwVQ?m=

In OSM werden einzelne Fahrspuren aber nur dann als eigenständige Straßen erfasst, wenn sie von den anderen Spuren baulich getrennt sind, also z.B. durch eine Verkehrsinsel. Kann man zwischen den Spuren hin- und herwechseln, dann wird in OSM auch nur eine einzelne Straße eingetragen. 

Wenn du dir die Hauptfahrbahnen an dieser Kreuzung anschaust, siehst du, wie Fahrspuren eingetragen werden, z.B. an diesem Weg: http://osm.org/way/689638785  Dort sind die Tags "lanes", "turn:lanes" und ein paar weitere eingetragen. Damit ist die Straße komplett beschrieben ohne weitere Wege einzeichnen zu müssen.

Wenn du Fragen hast, melde dich gerne per Mail oder im Forum!

Grüße
Jan
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-14 01:43:01+00:00): hello, can you explain why you remove the tag:usage=irrigation	
waterway=canal
?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-19 14:48:01+00:00): you kept editing and declined replying to this edit. will revert these incorrect changesets
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-28 18:21:04+00:00): reverted
IceAgeMike (2019-06-01 09:10:41+00:00): Hello NunoCaldeira,

was on hollidays and didn´t have time to complete this: Something is wrong or missing with this "canal": a waterway canal is nomally somthing bigger, size of a river. this canal  is directly connected to a road and has also a tag highway path. A waterway=canal and a highway=path on the same element can´t be correct. Or somthing is missing: maybee intermittend=yes if it dries out or layer=-1 if it es covered

IceAgeMike
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-06-01 09:26:43+00:00): hi Mike, thanks for replying, hope you enjoyed your hollidays. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dcanal Wiki states "For small artificial waterways used for drainage see waterway=drain and waterway=ditch.", the levadas are not used for drainage, their usage is for irrigation. therefore this tag is correct. regarding the highway and the canal sharing the same element, makes sense as most of the walking elements are the structure of the canal itself. we have a few exceptions and some mappers draw the highway parallel to the canal, however doing this for 2000km of canals is something that takes time.

cheers
s8evq (2019-06-04 07:10:55+00:00): Beste FrDs,

Het is beter om de tag alt_name (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:alt_name) te gebruiken ipv beide namen te scheiden via een /
Amoksunset (2019-06-25 04:02:45+00:00): can you add the knot 6122455985 to the road 266571572 ?
PT-53 (2019-05-14 07:00:13+00:00): Hallo Macke008,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast bei Wangen in diesen Wald https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23060281 eine Waldparkanlage Herfatz Wangen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689740975 eingezeichnet und darin wiederum nochmal einen Park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689740974#map=18/47.70157/9.82024&layers=N.
Das ist technisch falsch. Auch kann ich auf der Homepage von Wangen keinen Hinweis auf einen Park finden.

Wo kann ich Infos zu diesem Park finden?

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-05-19 06:11:31+00:00): Hallo Macke008, 
es wäre schön, wenn Du noch antworten würdest.
Grüße
Akkurator (2019-08-08 10:31:08+00:00): Den Park im Park habe ich soeben gelöscht, da offensichtlich technisch falsch und der Mapper nicht antwortet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73146687

Diese "Waldparkanlage Herfatz" existiert mMn nicht. Ich radle dort ab und zu am Waldrand vorbei und mir ist nie eine besondere Anlage aufgefallen.
Wenn ich in den nächsten Wochen wieder mal vorbeikomme, werde ich mir das genauer ansehen.

Momentan glaube ich aber eher an Pokemons.

S.a. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73147177
Akkurator (2019-08-22 21:05:15+00:00): Ich war heute dort. Da ist nichts, was irgendwie nach Park aussieht. Einfach nur Wald mit ein paar Wegen drin. "Park" gelöscht. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73642069
PT-53 (2019-08-23 06:06:54+00:00): Danke
DressyPear4 (2019-05-13 22:15:25+00:00): leisure e landuse  são tag's distintas e não devem ser adicionadas na mesma área.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70206237
PT-53 (2019-05-14 07:08:09+00:00): Hallo Macke008,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz diesen Baum https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1915194768/history - vermutlich versehentlich - um rd. 337 m verschoben.
Diesen Baum https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5513883245/history hast Du neu angelegt. Ich kann auf den Luftbildern dort aber keinen Baum erkennen. Diesen Baum hast Du gelöscht, obwohl - gem. Luftbildern - dort ein Baum steht.
War das ganze ein Versehen?

Fragende Grüße
sskalyan (2019-10-24 13:53:29+00:00): Hi Jonkrato,

Is there any specific reason behind adding motor_vehicle=no to this road? Motor vehicles can be seen in latest imageries. 

Thanks in advance,
kalyan.
JonKrato (2019-10-30 16:02:15+00:00): I didn't added a motor_vehicle=no tag to that road.
JonKrato (2019-10-30 16:08:39+00:00): Add* a motor_vehicle=no tag. Looking at the history on that way it appears that Nakaner-repair added the motor_vehicle=no tag.
trigpoint (2019-10-30 19:02:44+00:00): The private tagging of this and other roads in Cheadle goes back a long way, all were added by one mapper who has not been active for 5 years.
Private access does seem a bit odd, and it was added with no explanation. 
Will add some notes to see if a passing mapper, maybe me, can see any actual evidence for these tags.
Cheers Phil
sskalyan (2019-10-31 03:56:32+00:00): Hi Jon and Phil,

Thanks for your responses and for adding note to address this issue. Is it okay to delete "motor_vehicle=no" tag based on latest imageries in which vehicles are present? We are happy to learn from local mappers.

Regards,
Kalyan.
trigpoint (2019-10-31 12:54:42+00:00): Hi Kaylan
I would think so, if motor vehicles were not allowed people would not be able to reach their houses.
Also looking at other roads mapped as access=private the tag does not make sense, For example Hall Orchard leads to a public footpath, indicating it as a minimum a right of way on foot. Also Windy Arbour is a public footpath, again making the access=private tag wrong.
Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2019-10-31 12:59:07+00:00): I should also add that the speed limit will be either 20mph or 30mph, it is certainly not 30kph. Also a speed limit very odd thing to add to a road in the same changeset that you have added motor_vehicle=no,
Cheers Phil
sskalyan (2019-11-01 04:10:34+00:00): Hi Phil,

Thanks for your valuable inputs and reasoning. Since we are unsure of private tag, let's not edit it. I will delete the "motor_vehicle=no" tag so that people would be able to reach their houses. Hoping for local mapper response on the notes you have added. 

Thanks again,
Kalyan.
nmsl🤣 (2019-10-12 12:41:42+00:00): Qingyuan Bridge is being rebuilt
(Inactive) Hoordinates (2019-10-15 16:48:09+00:00): Thanks for letting me know.
Nmxosm (2019-05-14 15:12:03+00:00): Hallo velo-phil,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Für ein geschlossenes Restaurant bietet es sich an, die entsprechenden Tags zu wählen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix). 
Passend wäre hier also amenity=restaurant zu disused:amenity=restaurant zu ändern. Dann sollte auch der Name beim ursprünglichen "Smørgås" bleiben. Das hat den Vorteil, dass Programme es nicht mehr bei normalen Suchen finden. 

Zum Überblick sind die folgenden Seiten sicher hilfreich:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Bei Fragen melde dich bitte einfach als Antwort hier, schreib unter https://forum.osm.org/ oder einer der zahlreichen Mailinglisten (z.B. http://lists.osm.org/mailman/listinfo/talk-de) oder erstelle eine Note (https://osm.org/note/new)

Ich hoffe, ich konnte dir erstmal weiterhelfen.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2019-06-14 08:51:53+00:00): Korrigiert.
viloan (2019-05-13 19:46:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
skquinn (2019-05-20 01:24:04+00:00): Please note opening_hours has a specific syntax: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

I have fixed the value for Old Falls Village for you; please note this syntax should you need to specify a certain amount of time after sunset in the future. (A similar scheme applies to sunrise, dawn, and dusk.)
BCNorwich (2019-05-15 06:48:00+00:00): Hi please refer to my previous link for OSM practice of tagging golf features. I've amended the two new greens tagging.
Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-05-15 06:49:12+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course for golf feature tagging.
PT-53 (2019-05-14 09:35:13+00:00): Hallo geo-ranger,
service=driveway ist nur für Zufahrten auf Privatgrundstücken gedacht, also nur diesen Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689517748#map=19/47.95409/9.21478&layers=N
An diesem Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220093777/history ist driveway falsch.
Falls Du entspr. Ortskenntnisse hast, könntest Du jeweils noch surface ergänzen und die Nutzungsbeschränkung access=agricultural überprüfen bzw. berichtigen. access=agricultural sperrt auch Fußgänger und Radfahrer aus, ebenso Besucher, die zum Hilarihof wollen. Das wird wohl so nicht richtig sein.
Grüße
phidauex (2019-05-13 20:44:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for your update to the map - everything looks good. Since you requested a review, I have two small suggestions for improvement - on the Eby Creek addition, the Eagle River way accidentally got joined with a node to the Eby Creek Road bridge - usually these should only have a joining node if they are physically connected. In this case, you can right click on the joined node in iD, and select "Disconnect" to separate the node.

Second, on Beard Creek Trail, you'll notice a tag called "tiger:reviewed=no" which means no human has reviewed the road segment since it was originally imported. Since you took the time to review the road segment, and correct the geometry, you can remove the tiger:reviewed tag to indicate that you've taken care of it.

Thanks, and happy mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70207721
Jan Wilts (2019-05-14 08:11:04+00:00): Hallo IIVQ, onderhoud aan de NS treinen wordt tegewoordig uitgevoerd door de afdelingen Service, Onderhoud en Modernisering en niet meer door "NedTrain". Zie: https://www.ns.nl/over-ns/treinonderhoud
IIVQ (2019-05-16 18:06:50+00:00): Ah ok. Het stond als "Nedtrain" op de tekeningen.