piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JanFi (2018-01-24 18:16:08+00:00): Je hebt er in de Damstraat wel een onvoorstelbare knoeiboel van gemaakt: dubbel getekende fietspaden, verrkeerde eenrichtingsaanduidingen, bepaalde afslagbewegingen die niet meer gemaakt konden worden, een onbestaand fietspad, ... Ik denk dat ik de meeste fouten hersteld heb.
Glenn Plas (2018-01-28 17:50:21+00:00): Beste Jan, als jij er in de eerste plaats was afgebleven zou ik zoveel werkt niet gehad hebben om alles terug te zetten.   Je mag altijd concrete zaken naar mijn attentie brengen want voorlopig weet ik niet waarover je het exact hebt.
Glenn Plas (2018-01-28 17:51:20+00:00): Ik zal jouw edits graag toetsen aan de waarheid, bedankt om mij erop te wijzen dat je weeral met de grove borstel OSM naar je hand probeert te zetten.
Glassman (2017-07-26 01:43:00+00:00): We try not to use descriptive names for objects. Use the appropriate tags instead. For private driveway use highway=service, service=driveway, access=private.
seattlefyi (2017-07-26 15:48:53+00:00): Thanks for making the correction! Hope to see more edits (also, hope you successfully got your pokemon!).
wambacher (2017-07-29 20:46:09+00:00): WHY did you remove mostly all ways from this boundaries? they are like ruins without walls.

walter
Julio_Costa_Zambelli (2017-07-29 21:38:02+00:00): Dear Walter, Starting in August this will be the north boundary of the "Región del Biobio". And the "Provincia de Ñuble" will be eliminated to give way to the three new provinces (Punilla, Itata and Diguillin) that were created in this and other changesets. Although I still have to delete the Provincia de Ñuble relation (I was editing with iD and I think it doesn't have a delete relation option). Cheers
wambacher (2017-07-29 23:04:26+00:00): Something like that I had expected. I was not quite sure. 

btw: you should switch to JOSM - iD is not made for relations. You are mapping since 2008 (me 2009) and using iD? no good ;(

Regards
walter, germany
Julio_Costa_Zambelli (2017-07-30 01:04:16+00:00): Yeah, I know 😆 I am already using JOSM I would say half of the time, but I am no power user at all. I am actually not sure why I started this task with iD, I was probably doing something else when I decided to do this.
muralito (2017-07-26 12:56:11+00:00): Por favor, no cambiar de trunk a trunk_link com ohiciste en este caso. los _link son para rampas o similares, no para vias comunes y corrientes como esta.
ElliottPlack (2017-07-26 04:24:45+00:00): Hi there. Welcome to the OSM project! It looks like you have been mapping sidewalks. These look good so far. Just one request though: when a sidewalk reaches the end, connected back to the road (unless it truly ends with no connection). This will help with pedestrian/detour routing. You can use the "crosswalk" preset for mapping the connection. Thanks!
ElliottPlack (2017-07-26 04:25:34+00:00): CORRECTION: Just one request though: when a sidewalk reaches the end, connect *it* back to the road
maptastical (2017-07-26 20:14:59+00:00): Okay, thank you for the feedback! I've tried to check the wiki often and follow mapping conventions whenever I can build on what others have done before me, but there's still so much I haven't learned yet. Thank you for explaining the proper practice!
TheBestIdea (2020-02-10 18:22:20+00:00): Hey Daniel,

I can't find anything that indicates this is Congress St. Street signs say 6th Ave/Ave of the America and so does the NYC GIS map (links below). Can you point to anything that says Congress?

Thanks!

Brandon

https://goo.gl/maps/ZNoJZh433J95jy4h9
http://maps.nyc.gov/doitt/nycitymap/?z=10&p=983481,204556&c=GISBasic
chihchun (2017-09-06 13:56:14+00:00): There is no toilets or any building in natural area, please don't tag toilets which is not exist.


* 節點：合歡荒草大茅坑 (4993731382)  - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4993731382
* 節點：天地廁所 (4310344753)  - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4310344753
* 節點：合歡置高點小茅坑 (4993747406)  - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4993747406
愛台玩 (2017-09-07 15:24:10+00:00): 是茅坑
不是馬桶廁所
請到現場確認後再評論
chihchun (2017-09-08 11:23:15+00:00): 謝謝答覆。會補上相關 Tag
chihchun (2017-09-08 11:24:30+00:00): 請問天地廁所也有茅坑嗎？
chihchun (2017-09-08 11:30:34+00:00): 另外請問指示牌不應該用 樹木 標示，這些路標是否為實地踏查結果？或是用長度計算的虛擬指標？

請改用 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmilestone 標注。
chihchun (2017-09-08 12:08:21+00:00): 已經修正兩個茅坑，補上 toilets:disposal=pitlatrine

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51842623
Upendrakarukonda (2017-07-26 05:48:08+00:00): Hi  luanalymasouto2010,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind the deletion of this highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43041839/history even though it's existing in mentioned imagery? I'm reverting it back as it seems to be appropriate data.

Regards,

Upendra.
oormilavinod (2017-07-26 05:13:21+00:00): 
hey knzfv, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
calfarome (2017-07-27 06:18:19+00:00): The comment here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50578881
GOwin (2017-07-26 05:07:47+00:00): Hello. It's not necessary to add name=rumah in your buildings.

Do you mean something else? Is "rumah" a place name? 

Just remember you're editing a live database, and there are many others using the map you get out of it.
Nakaner (2017-07-28 20:48:29+00:00): Hi TheDude05,

this changeset looks very much like an import. When was this import discussed on the Imports mailing list? Where can I find its documentation on the OSM wiki?

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner-repair (2017-08-01 18:11:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 50759459, 50758874, 50760122 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of buildings (changesets 50575548 and 50575508) from Charleston County GIS. I did not find wiki page about it. Please follow the Import Guidelines. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
TheDude05 (2017-08-18 21:00:17+00:00): Forgive me, I did not know what I was doing was in fact what was defined as importing as I am an individual and not an entity.  With reading the import protocols and seeing that its application is not restricted to large entities or large data sets I see that I was in error.
TheDude05 (2017-08-20 23:36:22+00:00): I would also like to point out that another user told me that what I did was not an import so I suppose I would like some clarification of what your definition of an import is if it differs from the official one and whether or not you think opening a shapefile in JOSM and copying the contents and cleaning any errors would be considered an import.
oormilavinod (2017-07-26 05:12:24+00:00): 
hey Juaninacio94, welcome to OSM.  I appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a park over the buildings. please add ground truth to the map. have a nice day  Happy mapping !!
SafwatHalaby (2017-08-01 11:11:51+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
DustyOnTheRoad (2017-07-27 15:45:01+00:00): Piazza Della Repubblica
Piazz_a_
dgitto (2017-09-16 07:22:51+00:00): Il tag "name" va usato solo per inserire il nome proprio di un oggetto, se esiste. "Parcheggio" non lo è.
mavl (2017-07-26 16:40:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы удалили часть линий и вместо них добавили новые. Так не нужно делать. Нужно редактировать существующие линии, а не создавать вместо них другие.  
  
Новые линии добавлены неаккуратно. Линии  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510365102  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152777960  
пересекаются. Они не должны пересекаться. Они должны иметь общие точки.  
  
Статусы highway=secondary_link и highway=trunk_link перед кольцом - это ошибка. Эти статусы используются на многоуровневых развязках, но не на кольцах.  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway?uselang=ru]  
Эти статусы обычно можно безболезненно отбросить без нарушения связности дорог.  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Additional_rules_to_highway_classification]  
  
От этого пакета правок больше вреда, чем пользы. Напишите, пожалуйста, какую проблему должен был устранить этот пакет правок?
lkskg34 (2017-07-26 07:05:04+00:00): Psychiatrist Aglaia Chrysidou
geoaria (2017-09-05 18:17:40+00:00): آقا جواد در نقشه خرابکاری کرده اید خیابان "اصغر امینی" را به صورت خط مستقیم در آورده اید و ایجاد یک مسیر به عنوان خط نیرو و اتصال آن به جاده مسکونی اشتباه است
اگر به ویرایش نقشه آشنا نیستید . از ادامه کار و خرابکاری در نقشه خودداری کنید که زحمات دوستان نقشه کش را از بین می برید
SafwatHalaby (2017-08-01 10:33:50+00:00): Those buildings don't seem to be properly tagged. In order to tag "holes" in buildings, you need to use multipolygons.
SafwatHalaby (2017-08-01 10:36:49+00:00): Fixed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50748113
gscholz (2024-01-02 12:25:05+00:00): Hi Семён Семёнов,
currently the user Реdактор is active in this region and covering the wood areas you have added 6 years ago with grassland like here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145611933

May be you could help to teach him how to edit multi-polygones properly. 

I have already opened a discussion about this topic here:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/145753610

Kind regards
Guido
Ars-UA (2017-07-26 09:12:10+00:00): В этой местности огромные территории уже отмечены как landuse=farmland, не рисуйте более мелкие участки с этим же тегом.
Аександр (2017-07-26 11:33:39+00:00): ок
Hjart (2017-07-26 08:07:59+00:00): Bemærk at denne her "guideline" kun gælder hvor skilte på stationen ikke indeholder ordet "station": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation#Things_to_avoid.
Personligt finder jeg det også rart at have f.eks. "Vojens Station" fremfor kun "Vojens"
c960657 (2017-07-26 09:24:34+00:00): På de mørkeblå skilte på de danske stationer (de som hænger på perronerne og kan ses inde fra toget), bruges ordet “Station” generelt ikke. Så derfor er det vel i overensstemmelse med den citerede retningslinje, når jeg fjerner “Station” fra navnet?

Jeg har dog ikke aflagt besøg på Gelsted Station, så jeg tør ikke sige, om skiltningen der afviger fra normalen.
Hjart (2017-07-26 10:11:42+00:00): Ok, det kan du have ret i.
Iøvrigt super at få ryddet lidt op i stationerne. Der trænger til det nu :-)
calfarome (2017-07-27 06:16:29+00:00): Hello Kyaw Htet Aung, 
Thank you for your map  edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
What is the source of this data that you are adding?, it seems that each of the points you added has its duplicates to the side and that is inconsistent for OpenStreetMap.
Could you please explain what happening is here?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50578881#map=12/16.8433/96.1824
mueschel (2017-07-27 08:32:03+00:00): Hi,
it also looks like there are many tags copied from the source without changing them to common OSM standards. E.g. these tags should not appear in OSM

Shape_Area=0.00606869668746
Shape_Leng=0.57835062104
lat=16.850959
lng=96.162165

And, for example name tags in different languages have to use a well-defined scheme to be usable by all tools.
rene78 (2017-07-29 21:30:33+00:00): Time to revert?
wasyl50 (2017-07-26 07:58:33+00:00): Nie wyświetla się nazwa rezerwatu.
eggie (2017-07-26 09:48:07+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
trigpoint (2017-07-26 11:04:49+00:00): Hi, welcome to Osm. Please remember that OSM is a public database. This edit, combined with your note, makes me think that this is some sort of personal marker. If you want to save or share a location then there is the mapshare button on osm.org. 
Cheers Phil
user_5359 (2017-08-31 09:57:47+00:00): Hello

Could we change the amenity=Public Toilet to amenity=toilets (because all OSM toilets are public)?
And it would make sense to add a building=yes.
Rafiki Blues (2017-07-26 08:35:09+00:00): I meant 82a
nammala (2017-07-27 06:30:18+00:00): Hi ,

May I know the reason behind changing all the place city town tags to suburbs. Could you please confirm the edits you have made.

Regards,
nammala
Vulcanodong (2017-07-27 06:32:59+00:00): Hi this place shall be tagged with the rule in this link http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_China#.E4.B9.A1.E7.BA.A7.E8.A1.8C.E6.94.BF.E5.8C.BA.2FTownship_level
nammala (2017-07-27 06:39:43+00:00): Great Thanks for getting back
Chieftl (2017-07-26 10:08:36+00:00): Позначки особистого характеру заборонені на загальній карті OpenStreetMap.
Вам доведеться видалити їх.
Для цього в Maps.me є мітки, які залишаються тільки у вашому телефоні.
Allroads (2017-07-26 09:25:24+00:00): Hoi, die achterpaden dat zijn geen paden met een blauw voetpad bord.
Ze zijn feitelijk openbaar, je mag er namelijk ook fietsen bromfietsen, zelfs met de motor op veel plaatsen, breedte is een beperkende factor, vaak is er geen stoeprand om er te komen.
Achterpaden hebben een hoofd functie, bereiken van de huizen, brandgang,
Ik zou voor highway=path kiezen.
Zelf voeg ik er aan toe path=service
service=alley, om de functie te benadruken.

Ook voor foot routering is het goed om te weten, dat er verschil is. Zou toch graag voor de huizen langs gerouteerd willen worden.
Allroads (2017-07-26 09:27:17+00:00): Boven op deze pagina dat blauwe pijltje routering kan je zelf eens kijken hoe foot routeerd.
karitotp (2017-07-27 06:35:25+00:00): Hi Barbara du Preez-Ulmi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. Could you please confirm if this object is an water way, if so you should aligning according the imagery. Thank you.
BCNorwich (2017-07-26 12:44:49+00:00): Hi, you inadvertently moved a bus stop, no problem though I've reverted the change. I mapped the area of your new Pocket Park and included the website. Hope that's OK, good luck. Bernard
MoragNimbus (2017-07-26 13:12:33+00:00): Thank you, thank you, thank you! I was a bit baffled about my E10 postcode search first suggesting a location near Hampstead Heath. And as you say - I had no intention of moving a bus stop. Thanks for including the pocket park.
mueschel (2017-07-31 15:45:14+00:00): Hi,
could you explain all the name tags of this node?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4858193412
I doubt it has this name with '3.5 t'
Jay May (2017-08-01 07:13:29+00:00): Hi :)
Sure! This is for people using OSM-based GPS apps (ex.: maps.me) to know which lane is for regular cars (≤3.5t meaning “for vehicles with a weight up to 3,5 tons), and which one is for trucks (TIR, abbreviation of Transport International Routier, is understood by every truck driver using those border checkpoints). OSM policy states clearly we must tag with “border control” the exact place(s) where border control takes place, which I regularly correct (most people tag the border itself). However, nothing is stated about the names, so I usually add the name of the border checkpoint + additional info (ex.: car lanes, truck lanes, “nothing to declare” lanes, “local traffic only”, etc.). This allows people to have the info before they head to the border checkpoint, and sometimes before they make the wrong border checkpoint choice :)
Hope this helps.
mueschel (2017-08-01 14:30:29+00:00): We do have a clear policy that the name tag contains just the actual name and does not contain any description. For this you can use tags like maxweight or hgv. If tools like maps.me do not support this, request them to adapt to common OSM tagging rules.
Jay May (2017-08-01 17:40:00+00:00): One question: what will it change for OSM if those border control tagged names are not visible to regular OSM users anyway?
mueschel (2017-08-01 18:15:40+00:00): Who is a "regular osm user"? There are hundreds of different maps and tools around. All of them render different things. And for example searching for names gets increasingly difficult if we add arbitrary information to the name tag.
Jay May (2017-08-01 18:52:38+00:00): I'm afraid this is not arbitrary info. It is useful info, otherwise I wouldn't waste my time to look for it and reflect it on OSM. Rules are there as an indication, and may sometimes be wrong Some of them must be changed. 
You state the policy on names it clear. I'm afraid it isn't. There are a couple of contradictions that I highlighted in my profile. 
Look what happens with Belarus, for instance. Some people here decided that all should be in Russian, and guess what? All locality and metro station names are in Belarusian, which only brings confusion among OSM users, even Russian-speaking just because a minority on OSM decided arbitrarily not to reflect the reality.
All this to say, not disrespecting your work, that before caring about such small details, we should care about drawing everything as it should be. Latvia is the perfect example of a total lack of prioritizing. Roads drawn totally randomly (sometimes 1km from their real path!!), village names forgotten or wrongly placed, unexisting names in Russian or in English. A total catastrophy! Somehow nobody started correcting it before myself. I even launched an appeal recently on OSM on that matter because I won't be able to take care about it alone (I work, etc.)
I am open for discussion with in PM on these matters.
Please accept my apologies if you don't agree with me
Kind regards
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 06:07:37+00:00): hey  Foxelefant, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 05:59:49+00:00): hey Foxelefant, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
Essin (2017-12-27 21:14:23+00:00): Är detta verkligen ett namn, inte bara en beskrivning?
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 05:59:11+00:00): hey, Sillmario, welcome to OSM, I appreciate your interest in mapping, I do observe that you have added a park over a building. I would be really nice if you could verify this. have a nice day
literan (2017-07-27 10:13:00+00:00): и теперь у вас здание стоит на дороге. Пожалуйста, будьте поаккуратнее
Vesnushka (2017-07-28 06:15:18+00:00): Спасибо.
zalex_ua (2017-08-02 11:25:18+00:00): Там вже створено ігровий майданчик, це дублікат.
Я відкочую вашу правку.
RobJN (2017-09-15 18:57:53+00:00): Hi MTreeWill,

A belated thanks for all your edits to on OpenStreetMap. I hope you enjoyed it :-)
http://www.mappa-mercia.org/
daveemtb (2017-09-06 10:29:17+00:00): I'm not sure whether the source you have used is ok copyright wise, as it is (I think) based on an OS map. Please check. Which section of the SDW was missing? It used to be complete here.
daveemtb (2017-09-06 10:30:32+00:00): also some of the surface tags appear to be inaccurate. I will correct from local knowledge.
HamsterFangs (2017-09-07 11:59:37+00:00): Hi Dave,
The vast majority of changes I'm making is to ensure the bridleway or byway designation is stated, including the SDW designation in some very short sections. This is to ensure correct routing for mapping software such as Strava, RideWithGPS, etc, which often missed out rideable sections. I'm colour blind so I can't easily use the OS maps; the ESCC map helps me see the bridleways, which I can then cross reference by OS.
OS doesn't show everything. I've found a couple of licensed bridleways that are not mapped (ESCC are adding them to the definitive map).

BTW I'm riding the whole SDW on Saturday :)
daveemtb (2017-09-07 12:17:56+00:00): Enjoy the SDW - it's a fantastic ride! :) I did it last July, but I'm not fit enough this year to be able to manage it again, 35 miles was quite enough for me when I rode from Amberley to Southese a month ago! If you haven't ridden it before, the following website can be useful, though it is probably getting outdated. http://www.bikedowns.co.uk/

I would be very cautious about taking information from OS maps or any county definitive map. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey I believe that 1:25k and 1:50k maps showing public bridleways, footpaths, etc, aren't part of the OS open data release.
GerdP (2017-08-24 13:24:11+00:00): Hi!
I've fixed a typo highway=residencial
instead of highway=residential
on several ways in this area. This is probably caused by the auto complete function in JOSM, so watch out ;-)
See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51406992
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-08-16 11:10:43+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
gileri (2017-07-27 21:06:51+00:00): Nickel !
Pikse (2020-10-02 13:07:01+00:00): Viki ütleb, et "highway=bus_stop" käib kokku sildiga "public_transport=platform" ja mitte sildiga "public_transport=stop_position" ning veel, et viimase sildiga sõlme pole tee peale tarvis eraldi märkida, kui tee kõrval läheduses on sõlm sildiga "highway=bus_stop". Vt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport=stop_position
zstadler (2023-05-13 12:19:24+00:00): Hello,

In this edit you have changes the min_height of the saddlebrown building part
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510457003/history
from 89.1 to 80.24.

However, the height of the ivory building part https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509856108/history remained 89.1.

As a result, there is an overlap of these building parts between 80.24 and 89.1.

Could you please look at this?

Thanks,
Zeev
Ynhockey (2023-05-13 17:42:45+00:00): Hi, I have hopefully fixed it. I don't think there was an issue with the overlap per se, but some renderers might not know how to handle it, so I have made specific non-overlapping objects. Not having done 3D in a long time, it might not look good the first time, but I hope it will.
GinaroZ (2017-07-27 11:57:57+00:00): Hi. You should probably add the important tags onto the hospital grounds. And then just leave building=hospital on this relation, so that there is not a duplicated hospital.
msevilla00 (2017-07-27 12:23:42+00:00): Yes, you're right. I hesitated when did it. I'll solve it. Thanks
msevilla00 (2017-07-27 15:05:24+00:00): I guess I did it correctly: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50621497
RicoElectrico (2017-07-27 06:32:28+00:00): Cześć, mam kilka uwag: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4947003196 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4947025636
Teraz te węzły to tylko adresy z nazwą, a brakuje określenia typu (szkoła, przedszkole) - czyli powinien tam być jeszcze tag amenity=school lub amenity=kindergarten.

Druga rzecz, że ten budynek jest narysowany jak mniemam na oko, a nie ze zdjęć lotniczych/satelitarnych lub Twoich pomiarów? Myślę, że lepiej by go po prostu nie rysować i poczekać, aż źródła będą. Mniejsza szansa, że ktoś go poprawi do  faktycznego stanu, jeśli już coś (nawet o tak dużej niedokładności) jest narysowane.

A, no i plac zabaw nie musi się nazywać "Plac zabaw", bo w końcu to wiadomo, wystarczy mu oznaczyć typ.
PlaneMad (2017-09-01 09:19:18+00:00): One more mistaken tag change to a National Highway. Please see on how the tags work https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 05:48:15+00:00): hey Ceuthophilus, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
raito (2017-07-26 13:19:05+00:00): source=digitalglobe
(mapillary not used)
literan (2017-07-26 22:54:38+00:00): amenity=water_point в центре Москвы, на доме? Удаляю.
iWowik (2017-07-27 05:32:07+00:00): Откатываю...