piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-12-04 11:05:10+00:00): I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me to know more about it or visit the documents listed below.
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114524365
Jarek 🚲 (2021-12-16 14:18:16+00:00): Hello, thank you for the updates on the construction here, they are very appreciated.

For your request for review, I would have a few suggestions in general:

- ramps that are temporary during the construction phase should be highway=motorway_link, rather than highway=construction. This is because routers won't map a route via highway=construction.

- ramps that are closed more or less temporarily might be better off set as highway=construction plus construction=motorway_link, rather than with motor_vehicle=no. I find that way it's easier to see what's currently closed. However, there isn't a good way of doing this with a schedule like "will close on December 2nd" - for adding a future closure, your tag "motor_vehicle=conditional=no @ (2021 December 2-2023 December 1)" looked good

- ramps that are closed permanently can be deleted as you did, or can be changed from highway=motorway_link to demolished:highway=motorway_link. The second option keeps the old ramp history for benefit of anyone who might be unfamiliar with the ongoing construction and sees the now-removed ramps on aerial/satellite imagery, but won't be used for routing

- you can also use "note" tags to put in a note to let other editors that this ramp or this routing is temporary during interchange reconstruction.

I made some updates in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115010990 but overall this was great.

Feel free to ask me if you have any other questions at any point of the reconstruction here or elsewhere.

Cheers,
Jarek
eggie (2021-12-05 19:42:49+00:00): Beste JDaalmans.. Het is niet conform de conventie binnen OSM om adressen op gebouwomtrekken te plaatsen. Ook niet de naam van een muziekschool.
Ik verplaats deze even weer naar een node. 
MVG
eggie
bxl-forever (2021-12-07 20:40:58+00:00): Hello @Mizuna,

Your changeset description says "schoolstreet" but the tags you added are "cyclestreet".

Those are two very different things: as you know, school streets are barred to motor vehicles during school days.  On the contrary, a cycle street remains open to traffic at all times but the signs imply a 30-kph speed regime and motor vehicles may not overtake cyclists.

What was the result of your survey here?
Mizuna (2021-12-08 11:59:14+00:00): Indeed it's about a cyclestreet not a schoolstreet.
ravali_78 (2021-12-06 10:53:47+00:00): Hi JanOK1337,
I have fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with highways.Kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114613568.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114524979
archie (2021-12-03 14:33:42+00:00): Hej, var vänlig och låt bli att tagga om kombinerade gång-/cykelvägar. De är helt rätt taggade med path. Tack!
intschutschuna (2021-12-07 21:18:22+00:00): Hallo BMt-Lew,

dieser Wegabschnitt ist vor Ort mit dem blauen Verkehrsschild 240 für Fußgänger und Radfahrer beschildert. Somit war der Weg gemäß OSM-Wiki mit highway=path bereits korrekt eingetragen. Siehe dazu
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath#Verwendung_als_Universal-Tag
und
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=240

Gleiches gilt auch für diesen Wegabschnitt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22802813
Ich habe das Tagging bei beiden Wegen wieder auf den korrekten Wert geändert.

Viele Grüße
intschutschuna
user_2780130 (2021-12-08 09:01:02+00:00): Hallo intschutschuna,
danke für den Hinweis und die Richtigstellung. Ich hatte mich wohl lediglich an der Wegbeschaffenheit orientiert und die Beschilderung nicht bedacht.
Beste Grüße
BMt-Lew
Leo Slager (2021-12-04 11:07:23+00:00): prima zo.
miche101 (2023-04-20 11:56:12+00:00): Hallo,

ich hab gesehen das du ganz viele Hydranten hinzugefügt hast. Dabei die "Referenznr." als Name=* erfasst hast. Ich würde diesen Name=* auf ref=* abändern wenn nichts dagegen spricht. Teilweise wurde das auch schon durch andere Benutzer gemacht. Weil ein z.B. "UH80 GA3" kein richtiger Name ist sonder eher eine Referenznr./-bezeichnung

Hab dazu auch schon ein Thema im Forum eröffnet:

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/emergency-fire-hydrant-mit-name/98152/6

Gruß  Miche
flokycool (2023-04-20 13:47:52+00:00): Hallo Miche,

UH80 steht für unterfluhr Hydrant und die 80 für den leitungs Durchmesser. Das sind wichtige Informationen für die Feuerwehr und deshalb im Namen. GA3 ist die Bezeichnung des Hydranten beim lokalen Wasserversorger. Also eigentlich ein Name… der Grund warum das alles kombiniert als Name drin steht ist damit die feuerwehrler auf den ersten Blick die wichtigsten Daten habe.. und damit nicht alle UH80 heißen, hab ich noch die Wasserwerk Referenz hinzugefügt. Es sollte im Namen bleiben kann aber auch zusätzlich als ref benutzt werden.
rempshaener (2023-04-29 15:14:24+00:00): Hallo,
miche101 hat die Namen auf ref gezogen, ich habe zusätzlich für https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9308711547 (Saugstelle) die Nennweite entfernt bzw. für 124 Objekte in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/135507676 die Nennweite durch ein fixme ersetzt.
Viele Grüße
richlv (2022-06-16 21:20:12+00:00): Sveiki, liels paldies par kartes uzlabojumiem :)
Šajā izmaiņu kopā pievienoti vairāki vārdi, kas neatbilst OSM vadlīnijām - piemēram, ēkas "Pleskavas šosejas 14. km ielas māja" un "Pleskavas šosejas 14. km sētas māja", stāvvieta "Rīgas-Siguldas šoseja 1E" un brownfield "Rīgas-Siguldas šoseja 1C".
Šī informācija iederas dažādos addr:* tagos, bet vārda (name) tagā liekami tikai īsti nosaukumi [1].
Te dažus mazliet palabošu, bet varbūt vēl kaut kur zināmi labojami.
Vēlreiz paldies par burvīgajiem uzlabojumiem un lai jauka kartēšana :)

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
IvarioLV (2022-06-20 13:20:31+00:00): Sveiks. Paldies par adrešu salabošanu šosejas adresēm. Māju nosaukumus es ņēmu no BalticMaps, un tobrīd kaut kā neatradu veidu, kā pielikt māju oficiālo nosaukumu (lai cik muļķīgs tas būtu) kādā citā veidā, kurā tās varētu arī atrast pēc šī nosaukuma. Variants par vienkāršotu risinājumu (14. km) ir diezgan labs.
richlv (2022-07-15 08:10:21+00:00): Izrādās, pilnais nosaukums ir oficiālā adrese arī VZD datos.
Adrešu imports šo nosaukumu ir atjaunojis - atvainojos par kļūdaino noņemšanu :)
No BalticMaps informāciju gan nedrīkstam ņemt nekādu, ja kaut kas vēl palicis, vajadzētu paskatīties, kādi citi avoti vai pārbaudes dzīvē iespējami.
IvarioLV (2022-07-15 09:07:07+00:00): Labi, paldies par norādēm.
felipeeugenio (2021-12-03 17:07:30+00:00): Hola Eugenio.
Esos services que dibujaste en verdad son tracks. Por favor consultar la wiki antes de hacer este tipo de cambios. AHora voy a tener que corregir todos.

y cuando sean privados por favor agregar access=private.

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114526352
MarcoR (2021-12-04 14:59:21+00:00): Ciao! Cosa è "Salotto Partenopeo"? Se inserisci solo il nome nessuno saprà di cosa si tratta (ad es. un bar, un hotel, un fruttivendolo, etc.). Il civico "86" va inserito nel nodo e non sulla strada.

A presto,
Marco.
felipeeugenio (2021-12-03 17:22:31+00:00): Hola Eugenio
Los potreros no tienen nombre, por favor seguir las politicas de nombres de la comunidad.

si acaso el potrero es administrado por alguien conocido, agregarlo como operador.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114526722
Cartographer10 (2021-12-03 16:54:05+00:00): Hallo Tanya,

Ik heb de huisnummers even terug veranderd in [1]. De adressen en gebouwen komen direct uit de Basisregistratie van het Kadaster. Ik zag dat (jij?) daar al een terugmelding had gedaan. Zodra die wijzigingen zijn geaccepteerd dan kan het ook op OSM worden aangepast. Anders zijn wij adressen aan het uitvinden :) 

Mvg,
Vincent


[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114529695#map=19/51.28250/6.05478&layers=N
MarcoR (2021-12-04 14:55:16+00:00): Non sono del luogo ma mi sembra tutto OK ;)
Leo Slager (2021-12-04 11:12:15+00:00): review:
Je hebt ook een aantal access tags toegevoegd.
Een highway=livingstreet is van huis uit al toegankelijk voor alle verkeersdeelnemers.
Dan is foot, bicycle, motor_vehicle=yes dus overbodig.
Het kan verder geen kwaad, mar je kunt ze gewoon verwijderen.
AngocA (2021-12-10 21:52:13+00:00): No hay living streets en Colombia.
fabiotofy (2021-12-04 19:20:34+00:00): può essere che il numero che hanno messo a questa strada sia SR252VAR ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114527590
alessandrocarmeli (2021-12-04 20:22:16+00:00): Non credo: sia l’inizio che la fine dovrebbero essere sulla strada stessa. Probabilmente diventerà una SR UD xxx. Non si può escludere il bis, racc o dir della 252 o della 305. Dopo guardo sul dito di fvg strade e ti so dire, sempre che sia di loro competenza!
mavl (2021-12-04 12:32:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет тег service=siding на некоторые железнодорожные пути.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381694829/history  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381700729/history  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381700728/history  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381698975/history  
  
Эти пути являются "съездами" (service=crossover), а не боковыми путями (service=siding).
MarcoR (2021-12-04 07:56:56+00:00): Ben fatto! Per il nome precedente puoi usare old_name (cioè old_name=Via D'Alaggio); in questo modo se qualcuno cerca la strada la trova con entrambi gli odonimi
FreedSky (2022-01-02 15:10:13+00:00): 你把南昌地铁主关系删了干嘛？
Claudius Henrichs (2022-02-02 10:17:30+00:00): Hi and thanks for reaching out.
This might have gotten lost in translation, but: I didn't consciously deleted "ownership" information with this change. Which object and which tag on that object are you referring to?
Ksawery Szewczyk (2021-12-03 15:47:43+00:00): 401*
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-04 11:19:51+00:00): Ciao, quando disegni gli edifici dovresti usare l’apposito strumento per ortogonalizzare gli angoli in iD: https://learnosm.org/it/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/ Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114528037
eggie (2021-12-04 08:56:16+00:00): Hoi
Je info heb ik even gecombineerd met de reeds aanwezige adresnode. Dus geen adressen aanmaken.
phoen heb ik aangepast met +31...
De format van de openingstijden klopt niet. Ma moet zijn Mo
Allemaal van die kleine dingetjes waar je achterkomt met een goede validator.
Kijk eens naar editor JOSM
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

Een aanrader
gr eggie
Sneeuwvlakte (2021-12-08 17:23:17+00:00): Bedankt voor de tip!
Ik heb JOSM gedownload.
gendy54 (2022-01-14 23:12:52+00:00): Why removed name on police station Gendarmerie nationale? See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Gendarmerie_nationale#Les_brigades

Donat
Flrbrmd (2022-01-15 07:34:06+00:00): En dehors du fait, que j'ai du suivre bêtement les proposition de correction sur ID, telle que l'ajout de la page Wikipédia. J'en ai aucune idée.

Merci de la correction.
gendy54 (2022-01-15 09:11:57+00:00): OK merci de ta réponse. je vais voir du côté d'ID si y a un truc qui cloche. Parce que si c'est ca, ca va pas.

Donat
VA00 (2022-07-17 17:32:00+00:00): Skąd pomysł aby ten twór otagować jako drogę rowerową?
mariotomo (2023-09-02 11:42:14+00:00): ciao! Qui c'è un po' di lavoro da fare, c'è un solo edificio scolastico, in cui funzionano tre scuole distinte. E poi c'è l'area con il cortile. Tutte le 5 entità sono marcate come amenity school. Come correggere?
mariotomo (2023-09-02 11:51:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140715078
starà bene?
DnaX (2023-09-03 10:59:43+00:00): Beh, potevi lasciare l'area scolastica, perché quella è. Il fatto che venda "amministrata" da 3 licei è un'altra cosa.
mariotomo (2023-09-03 11:07:00+00:00): "potevi lasciare l'area scolastica", secondo me dovremmo dirlo al renderer. perché qui ci sono tre scuole, non di più. così, senza corrispondenza grafica, prima o poi a qualcuno verrà in mente di tornarlo ad etichettare come amenity=school, e se lo fa spiegando la ragione, io non lo torno a correggere.
mariotomo (2023-09-03 11:08:29+00:00): https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/774
DnaX (2023-09-04 08:12:33+00:00): Scusa, sinceramente non avevo aprito il tuo changeset e avevo solo visto il rendering. Ok così, non conoscevo quel tag :)
wkdgs (2021-12-06 13:15:28+00:00): Sieht gut aus
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114529168
archie (2021-12-03 17:35:57+00:00): Hej, det du ritat in finns redan. Kolla upp  sådant innan du ritar, tack.
archie (2021-12-03 17:36:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3397610326
archie (2021-12-03 17:48:57+00:00): Varför ändrar du från det etablerade wlan (Wireless Local Area Network) - som även wikin föreslår - till wifi? Vilken förklaring har du för den här ändringen? Alla övriga internet_access i Göteborg är taggade "wlan". Har vi som taggat det här före dig med "wlan" varit okunniga?
r334 (2021-12-03 18:25:00+00:00): Jag är så van vid att fylla i wifi som standard i andra system så tänkte inte ens på det. Kollade igenom taggningarna nu och ser att det var fel.
archie (2021-12-03 18:27:06+00:00): Ok, var vänlig kolla alltid först innan du ändrar taggningen. De som har taggat där före dig kanske inte var bakom flötet i alla fall.
ivanbranco (2023-03-02 22:37:13+00:00): Hi Pastèque24,

you added several wikimedia_commons=* values that link to non-existent files, such as here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9308972351

this is the complete list of non-existent files I found:
PMZ_ADR_19022_CALV.jpg
PMZ_ADR_19060_GOPA.jpg
PMZ_ADR_19079_SAGN.jpg
PMZ_ADR_19121_PRAD.jpg
PMZ_ADR_19188_HAHY.jpg
PMZ_ADR_19196_ORME.jpg
PMZ_ADR_19234_DAZY.jpg
PMZ_ADR_19248_CHAT.jpg
PMZ_ADR_19250_SEXA.jpg
PMZ_ADR_19276_ALEX.jpg
PMZ_ADR_19276_FECE.jpg
PMZ_ADR_19276_RAYM.jpg
PMZ_FI-17100-0001.jpg
PMZ_FI-33140-0007.jpg
PMZ_FI-33145-0000.jpg
PMZ_FI-33165-0000.jpg
PMZ_FI-33213-0004.jpg
PMZ_FI-33505-0000.jpg
PMZ_FI-33505-0001.jpg
PMZ_SHL_19121_SUPU.jpg
PMZ_SHL_19162_COTE.jpg

could you check them out please?
ovruni (2021-12-03 20:39:00+00:00): Hola "SERENAZGO - SAN LUIS 2021", gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha colocado "edicion de locales municipales", sin embargo consiste en eliminar algunos objetos como el nodo que es parte de la relación del distrito, o mover algunos arboles sobre casas, por lo que restaurado los objetos. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
SomeoneElse (2023-11-29 22:04:55+00:00): Hello ashapancake, unfortunately we can't use Google as a source, as Google's ToS don't allow us to.  We'll have to revert and redact way 1008911663 .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
ovruni (2021-12-03 20:40:05+00:00): Hola "SERENAZGO - SAN LUIS 2021". He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han eliminado varios edificios sin motivo aparente (solo se indica "edicion de casas"), por lo que restaurado los objetos. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
Владимир К (2022-01-12 06:31:49+00:00): reverted
RemyDog (2022-01-13 17:34:57+00:00): I will reply to your related comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114496931
ivanbranco (2021-12-03 17:33:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/551841010

Perché hai cancellato l'alt_name?
user_10901495 (2021-12-04 09:11:10+00:00): È superfluo. Seconodo me gli utenti di osm inseriscono l'alt name e lo short name alle strade con un numero solo perché è riportato come esempio sulla wiki.
Se ci si pensa bene non ha nessun senso.
ivanbranco (2021-12-04 09:53:25+00:00): Come non ha senso? Via XX Settembre è un nome alternativo, il tag alt_name=* serve per i nomi alternativi.

Puoi ripristinarlo?
BAGgeraar (2021-12-28 09:40:01+00:00): Moet er aan de toegevoegde slagbomen ook niet access=yes toegevoegd worden? Dit omdat ze normaal gesproken geen beperking vormen.
Ik vraag dit vanwege foutmeldingen van brouter, https://brouter.de/brouter/suspects/TheNetherlands/Zeeland/all
eggie (2021-12-28 10:31:26+00:00): Jeroen .. Ik heb op voorhand access=yes toegevoegd aan de lift_gates op de doorgaande routes. Dit geeft in verschillende routers een hoop ellende en de routering is vervolgens helemaal zoek voor motorvoertuigen.
Check ook svp of je dit op andere doorgaande wegen bij sluizen en bruggen hebt gedaan.

MVG
eggie
SherbetS (2021-12-10 16:52:02+00:00): Thank you.
Dimitar155 (2024-01-06 16:59:01+00:00): Привет Пламен,

От тази промяна (и няколко други) има останали много възли без линии. Точните локации са налични в Osmose (https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/issues/open?source=6542&item=1080&class=1&limit=500). Можеш ли да ги прегледаш и да ги опрвиш, когато имаш възможност?

Поздрави,
Митко
plamen (2024-01-07 07:01:25+00:00): Пооправих доста, надявам се да не съм затрил нещо.
Dimitar155 (2024-01-07 08:19:37+00:00): Благодаря!
DressyPear4 (2021-12-04 10:01:02+00:00): Olá, não há necessidade de colocar praça dentro de praça.
Voce pode definir parquinhos como pontos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114531685
surveyor54 (2021-12-04 16:49:57+00:00): Hi,
das ist doch eine "Postfiliale" im Einzelhandel, hier im NDK, oder?
Dann sollte das auch nach dem neuen Schema getaggt werde.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office#.22Postfiliale.22_im_Einzelhandel

Viele Mappergrüße
surveyor54
wobi9000 (2021-12-04 17:04:32+00:00): Hi, thanks for your feedback. I tagged the DPD office as amenity=post_office. Did I miss something else?
surveyor54 (2021-12-04 17:18:46+00:00): Look at the Link.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office#Shop_as_post_partner
surveyor54 (2021-12-04 17:24:43+00:00): Here the Link to the proposal.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/shop_as_post-partner
wobi9000 (2021-12-04 17:26:23+00:00): ok, I see. Thanks for the links. I changed by description. Do you agree?
surveyor54 (2021-12-04 17:27:26+00:00): 👍
WoodWoseWulf (2021-12-08 04:06:53+00:00): Hi dwh1985.

Just curious if you have any info about this star-shaped building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008923823 

It looks really interesting! What was your source on it? Does it have a name?
WoodWoseWulf (2021-12-15 02:55:23+00:00): Hi dwh1985,

If I don't hear from you in the next 24 hours, I will remove this building and the other features added in this changeset. The imagery from March this year shows this location covered in woods with no clearing. It seems very unlikely a building of this size and design could have been constructed in such little time.
ElliottPlack (2021-12-15 18:10:11+00:00): DWH,

I agree with WoodWoseWulf here, this star shaped building seems unlikely. Please respond here.

WoodWoseWulf,

If you do the revert, please email data@openstreetmap.org and mention Ticket#2021121510000141 in the subject line, as we're tracking this issue as well.

- Elliott Plack  
OSM Foundation  
Data Working Group
WoodWoseWulf (2021-12-16 03:31:49+00:00): The building and surrounding road were removed in changeset #114985367 if this was in error and the building needs to be undeleted, please feel free to reach out with proof of the building's existence and I will assist in restoring the features if required.
SherbetS (2021-12-10 16:32:46+00:00): Thank You.
Nate Wessel (2021-12-03 23:29:02+00:00): I've reverted this changeset in changeset 114540378. I'm not sure what all changes were attempted here, but it left both India and Pakistan border relations in an invalid state. There was an open gap in their shared border. I'm not familiar enough with the region to assess the the quality of other edits so I thought it was safest to revert rather than manually bridging the gap myself.
ameziol (2021-12-04 23:51:06+00:00): a ok, czyli niezagospodarowane jako path, przyjęte do wiadomości :D
pitfire (2022-03-30 06:18:20+00:00): Hallo KöWiMM,

Wegverlauf: 998213683
ist kein "parking_aisle" und auch vermutlich nicht "Straße unterirdisch"
blackboxlogic (2021-12-05 16:50:09+00:00): Hi, you changed the name of this road from "Reid Lane" to "Wallace woods" but that seems wrong (based on the addresses along the road and the streetsign found at https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=43.367882~-70.474149&lvl=17&dir=211.397&style=x&v=2&sV=1)
Could you please change it back or provide a source showing the name "Wallace Woods".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114533184
blackboxlogic (2021-12-05 16:52:20+00:00): Hi, you removed the name "Northwood Drive" from the road but that seems wrong based on the addresses along the road and the streetsign at https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=43.372956~-70.474672&lvl=17&dir=268.036&style=x&v=2&sV=1. Plase put the name back or provide a reference for this street not being named Northood Drive.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114533299
ivanbranco (2021-12-04 09:56:32+00:00): Hi Karthoo,

because of a typo, you added many year_of_construcion instead of year_of_construction. Can you check it?
Karthoo (2021-12-04 13:13:17+00:00): Oops, thank you for the note. Fixed it
BlueMM (2022-01-27 11:43:15+00:00): Hi ChonkerStonker, I haven't seen this before in residential streets, but are all the additions of separately mapped footpaths redundant? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway seems to suggest the preferred way is to mark whether the road has sidewalks. In a few streets I looked at they were already marked, so manually adding footpaths seems to add complexity without adding more info (it looks like they are now duplicated). Thoughts?
Gamenetmoj (2021-12-03 19:06:16+00:00): عالی
ivanbranco (2023-02-19 18:51:08+00:00): Hi Pasteque24,

something went wrong with this wikimedia_commons values: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1rxz

they link to non existent images, could you take a look at them please?
PT-53 (2021-12-23 08:54:12+00:00): Hallo bigbug21,
nach Deinen Nearbeitungen in FN werden im OSM-Inspector 2 Hinweise "nonop_confusion_on_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.47263&lat=47.65298&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways

Ursache dürfte die falsche Verwendung von
disused=yes
sein.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Grüße und Frohe Weihnachten