piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GreyTK (2019-02-21 01:21:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM, mmayhue!

Consider moving the tags of the Node [https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6291681062] you created for the elementary school to the Way [https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671875817] you created for the same school. Then delete the node.

It's not necessarily a bad thing to have a node and a way representing the same object, but in general, the best practice is to have only one OSM object for each feature.

Good edits. Keep it up!
Aurimas Fišeras (2020-06-29 18:40:02+00:00): Kodėl?
UETK rodo, kad Kauno HE tvenkinys prasideda ties Naravais, dar prieš Prienus?
Tomas Straupis (2020-06-30 05:29:35+00:00): Įdomiai. Tarkim GRPK Kauno HE baigiasi labai logiškoje vietoje - ties Kruoniu. Pabandysiu pakalbinti GIS-Centrą, kodėl taip yra. Kitas dalykas, kai Kauno HE tvenkinys nusitempia iki Neravų tai labai kartografija susigadina: tada iki pat Neravų Nemuno „nėra“, nors bet koks žmogus pasakys, kad jis ten „yra“ :-)
Sitethief (2019-02-22 14:39:05+00:00): Sowieso moet alles qua bus in Zwolle over de kop ;)
viloan (2019-02-20 19:02:49+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
85Bas (2019-02-20 21:02:03+00:00): Beste BAGgeraar,

Ik zie dat je correcte straatnamen van cycleways verwijdert. Waarom is dat?

Groet,
85Bas
Akkurator (2020-02-03 00:07:15+00:00): Hallo ostomat,

für Zugangsbeschränkungen und -verbote gibt es das access-Tag, im Extremfall access=no.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access
Vorhandene Wege zu löschen ist da suboptimal.

Woher kommen die Trampelpfade, wenn dort ganzjähriges Begehungsverbot herrscht?

Grüße,
Akkurator
geow (2019-02-21 21:31:43+00:00): Wow, danke, dass du das so schnell korrigiert hast!

Gruß
geow
letihu (2019-08-10 18:00:54+00:00): Bitte hinterlasse keine leere nodes, die du zum Mappen von Gebäuden verwendet hast.
Z. B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6291932077/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6291932078/history#map=19/53.87405/13.92132
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6291932072/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6291936149/history

Ich habe sie schon mal gelöscht.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-20 22:10:54+00:00): Reverted in CS #67409476
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-20 22:12:38+00:00): Reverted in Changeset #67409531
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-20 22:17:35+00:00): Pitch (344604490) incorrectly deleted, this change set needs to be reverted
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-20 22:18:05+00:00): Dinosaur Hill Nature Preserve (278325723, v14) incorrectly deleted, this changeset needs to be reverted
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-20 22:29:28+00:00): Oh, it was actually just changed to woods in the woods, I corrected this.
tdiesel (2020-02-17 23:16:19+00:00): Hallo,
bitte keine doppelten Einträge anlegen wenn diese schon vorhanden sind. Stattdessen sollte  man die vorhanden Einträge ergänzen oder korrigieren falls nötig.
abrensch (2019-09-04 20:01:42+00:00): Hallo kartonage,

sag mal die Lange Brücke in Köpenik ist doch in beiden Richtungen für Autos befahrbar?

Dieses Wegstück sperrt sie aber in Ost-West Richtung:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144184843
kartonage (2019-09-05 02:16:48+00:00): Hej abrensch,

Uff, ganz blöder Fehler. Da hatte ich wohl nicht genau hingeschaut in der Annahme, dass der Split der Ways schon vorhanden war. Ich habs ausgebessert. 

Danke für den Hinweis!
Alan Bragg (2019-02-27 14:59:09+00:00): Looking at your changes in MA. Very nice! There are over 30 datasets at massdot. Which one are you using. I'm interested in your process. Thanks, Alan
cforin (2019-02-27 17:47:43+00:00): Hello Alan, thanks for the feedback I greatly appreciate it! I used the dataset https://geo-massdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/ef9192ecac9d44deac4a6b8711868c21_0 and specifically the "road inventory 2017". Let me know if you have further questions! -Cody
jmapb (2019-02-20 22:16:28+00:00): Hi Emily, welcome to OSM! This McDonald's looks great, very thorough!

One question -- is this entire building McDonald's? Offhand it looks like it is. When a single business (or other amenity etc) is the sole tenant of a building (ie, the building houses no other businesses or offices or residential units), we usually prefer to put the tags on the building itself rather than using a node. Just to be clear -- the way you did it is *not* incorrect! But putting the tags on the building provides a little extra information, namely that the building is single-purpose.

Thanks for contribution -- there are a ton of unmapped businesses in this neighborhood so I hope you will continue mapping! J
Enukt (2019-02-21 15:14:51+00:00): This is very helpful--thanks! And yes, the entire building is McDonald's. I'll go ahead and adjust it so the information is a tag on the building rather than as a separate node. But I'll use nodes when there's more than one business per building (which is definitely the case moving south along Washington Ave.). Thanks again.
jmapb (2019-02-21 16:14:16+00:00): Sure, and just to be clear: Only tag the building itself with business tags if it's a single-purpose building. If it has contains anything else -- apartments upstairs, or even a vacant shop -- better to use a node. Basically, when in doubt, nodes are better.

Please don't hesitate to message me if you have any questions -- very happy to help. Good luck & happy mapping!
Enukt (2019-02-21 16:19:21+00:00): Awesome. Thanks!
Basstoelpel (2019-04-10 20:04:35+00:00): Hallo tmrbng,

die ganzen Gebäude, die Du in Lyren eingezeichnet hast, sind leider noch unsichtbar, da Du sie nicht mit building=yes oder feiner als building=(whatever, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building) gataggt hast. Wenn Du das nachholst, sieht der Ort schon gleich viel vollständiger aus.
Adreß-Informationen ohne Hausnummer sind übrigens reichlich sinnlos. Sie werden auch folgerichtig auf https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/map#17/52.29979/9.31820/osm-wrongcity-minimalmissing-wrongstreet-outsideplz-falsepositive-dupes als Fehler angezeigt. 

Schöne Grüße,

Baßtölpel
DressyPear4 (2019-02-20 21:56:44+00:00): Olá Jhonata, áreas não devem ser grudadas nas vias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67408495
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-28 04:18:07+00:00): As a numbered country road, the number should go in ref=* and the name should either be empty or follow local convention. I changed it to `County Road 3011` for now in changeset 184725531 to match the nearby road (albeit unreviewed since the TIGER import), but it may need to be `CR 3011` or even empty.

https://osm.org/changeset/184725531
eggie (2019-02-20 22:31:31+00:00): Dag  keohr...  Je vraagt om een review. Lijkt me helemaal oke zo.
MVG,
Eggie
Mike Baggaley (2019-02-22 15:10:04+00:00): Hi, on way 50748230 you have added landuse=depot to building=yes. The landuse tag is intended to be used for the area surrounding buildings, not on buildings themselves. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
harg (2019-02-22 16:19:13+00:00): I've moved it to the area instead of the building. That ought to work.
saintam1 (2019-02-21 06:55:38+00:00): Hi, welcome to Sofia :)

For better or worse, we have a general rule in Bulgaria that boulevards take the "бул." prefix only in their name, not the full "булевард". It's documented on the wiki, although sadly on the Bulgarian version only: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria#.D0.98.D0.BC.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B0_.D0.BD.D0.B0_.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B8.D1.86.D0.B8_.D0.B8_.D0.B1.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B5.D0.B2.D0.B0.D1.80.D0.B4.D0.B8

Thanks to the Kaart team for your help! It's going to make a nice difference.
Unicorn Ostrich (2019-02-21 17:26:11+00:00): saintam1,

Thanks for the kind response. It is great to have such an active community there! I have corrected the changes to use the previous abbreviated form. There was a question I had after reviewing the web page further. It is about the tags int_name and name:en. It was unclear to me whether the abbreviated form applied to these tags as well. Perhaps some guidance could be offered as to standard practices for this. Thanks again for your comment and for contributing to the OSM community.

Sincerely,
Unicorn Ostrich
saintam1 (2019-02-25 22:05:22+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into it! Yes so we do usually shorten all 3 tags, the name, int_name and name:en. Don't ask me why we _need_ 3 tags in the first place :)
rarad74 (2019-02-21 20:20:36+00:00): Salut. De unde ai bagat toate datele astea pe harta? Nu exista pe nicio alta harta, iar pe osm nu poti pune informatii din alte surse ( fara drepturi) decat din cele de care dispune, adica doar imaginile proprii OSM sau trackuri gpx inregistrate de tine...
Nikolaїch (2019-02-21 10:27:49+00:00): Звідки берете інформацію про назви вулиць?
viloan (2019-02-20 22:05:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SHARCRASH (2019-02-20 22:11:29+00:00): + new elements
santamariense (2019-02-21 14:09:04+00:00): Reserve place=suburb para bairros oficiais ( estes são os oficiais de SG: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Gkl ). Para os demais (sub-bairros), como este https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6292172722, use place=neighbourhood (vizinhança)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67410650
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
BCNorwich (2019-02-21 07:55:11+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The path is saved to the database, it takes a little while even for the OSM map to be re-rendered. Other compiled maps could take quite a while before a fresh map is compiled/re-rendered and released.

The iDeditor always downloads up to date data so to check your features are in the database sign out of the editor. Signing in again downloads all the newest data. 

Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-02-21 08:02:22+00:00): I forgot to say the sidewalk tag is not appropiate as a sidewalk is a footpath beside a street (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk). There's no street so I've removed it. Also I tagged part of the path as covered=yes.
Juan Carlos G F (2019-02-20 23:28:56+00:00): *Corrección A-8 no A-67
saintam1 (2019-02-21 16:48:55+00:00): Hello, and welcome to Sofia!

Just wanted to point out that these appartment blocks don't have their street as part of the address -- the address in these socialist-era blocks is number+neighbourhood name (addr:place is the tag).

Happy mapping!
peacewaya (2019-02-25 17:15:17+00:00): Thank you, 
Our team mapping in Bulgaria is now aware of this. Unless the neighborhood is known, we will leave the apartments in these “socialist-era” blocks untouched. 

Do you have any criteria that would help us distinguish what apartments or areas should be tagged this way? Is it only apartment buildings that fall under this rule? 

We continue to learn new things in each country that we map and really appreciate the feedback!

I look forward to working with you!
saintam1 (2019-02-25 21:19:18+00:00): Hello!

It's only apartment blocks that fall under this rule, yes. You'll see them tagged already with addr:place.

It gets worse, actually, because many apartment blocks in fact have two addresses, both valid -- one is number+street, the other is number+place. People use either one. Just to keep things interesting ;)

Thanks for getting back in touch. And thanks for your team's work in Sofia!
Peter Bremer (2019-02-21 08:52:58+00:00): Bedankt voor de wijziging! Sorry, ik zeur een beetje, maar als het een C12 bord is (ziet er ook zo uit op Mapillary) zou het dan niet motor_vehicle:backward=no moeten zijn? En misschien zelfs oneway=yes met bicycle:backward=yes. Sorry, ben niet bekend met de situatie, maar werd er door m'n zus op gewezen... :-)
Leo Slager (2019-02-21 10:11:08+00:00): Sorry, had moeten zien dat het een vraag van een ervaren mapper was.
Je hebt gelijk, het moet motor_vehicle zijn.
Oneway is in het forum aan de orde gekomen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65331
Geen consensus.
Hier is toepassing van oneway wel mogelijk gezien de fysieke situatie.
Voor het fietspad ga ik nog even op verkenning: Hoe en waar eindigt het fietspad? Apart intekenen ?
Leo Slager (2019-02-21 11:55:29+00:00): Men is bezig met het nieuwe verkeerscirculatieplan voor het winkrelgebied. 
C12 inmiddels vervangen door C2, en het. fietspad is opgeheven
Peter Bremer (2019-02-23 11:41:17+00:00): We worden in ieder geval bezig gehouden :) Bedankt voor al het werk!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-03 07:53:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2379996262 - co miało być zaznaczone przez dispensing=no tutaj?
m@rio (2023-02-06 23:03:03+00:00): Cześć Mateusz Konieczny,
choć gramatyka Twojego pytania wzbudza pewne wątpliwości, 
to odpowiadając - prawdopodobnie wykonałem tu o jedno kliknięcie za dużo - skorygowałem.

pzdr
m@rio
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-03-09 14:34:57+00:00): Porque deletou coisas que o outro usuário fez? Edições revertidas.
GUTEMBERG SANTOS BEZERRA (2019-03-09 17:43:06+00:00): Primeiro, se foram deletadas tem um motivo, ou você acha que eu estaria perdendo tempo excluindo edições que não condizem com a realidade, como está bem descriminado na justificativa das exclusões. Sou do município em questão, conheço muito bem o que estou fazendo, trabalho na prefeitura do mesmo município, na área de obras e desenvolvimento de infraestrutura. Reveja oque fez, só como editor do Google mapas tenho mais de 8.000 pontos, tem alguns anos que faço isso.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-03-09 18:00:08+00:00): não fui eu quem reverteu, só estou te informando.
santamariense (2019-03-11 23:48:12+00:00): @GUTEMBERG, Muita coisa foi trazida de volta e adicionada tags mais apropriadas. Ou seja, era só ter mudado as tags/etiquetas. O bom é sempre avisar quem cometeu erros, nesse caso ter mapeados coisas de forma errada, para que aprenda e não volte a cometer os mesmos erros em outros lugares, &, que o outro mapeador corrija também o que foi feito errado. Para isso comente nas changesets quando notar algo errado.
chnav (2019-02-22 08:09:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста пишите комментарии к правкам, особенно когда что-то удаляете. Например "соединил линии ЛЭП" и т.д. При объединении линий остаётся история только одной из них, остальные удаляются. Пожалуйста учтите это. Спасибо.
viloan (2019-02-21 00:37:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Karthoo (2019-02-21 11:12:12+00:00): This changeset mostly adds duplicates of the existing service centers with the only difference being that the nodes are located on the streets!
mariotomo (2019-02-22 15:49:51+00:00): wrong description. I removed a residential road which was going into the church, and into the park.
dmlu (2019-02-21 18:38:33+00:00): Hello,
I noticed that you request a review. You changed the address, but didn't move the office node to "50, rue d'Eich". I moved it for you in the changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67439736.

Thank you for your contribution!
DressyPear4 (2019-02-21 10:49:34+00:00): Olá Geraldo, nomes não devem ser mapeados em caixa alta.
n76 (2019-02-21 03:58:00+00:00): For the Walmart in my town you've duplicated the store with a new node. There should be only one object for each feature. Old polygon is 395695579 and your new node is 6292287233.

Since there are apparently 4671 nodes you've touched/added here, this seems to be a mechanical edit and poorly done at that as your "OSM Conflator" did not conflate this at all.
woodpeck (2019-02-21 08:47:41+00:00): DWG has reverted this import after receiving a complaint. Since edits made with this account were generally sensible in the past, I assume it must have been some kind of error condition that led to this large import. Please fix your process by adding suitable safeguards (like "if number of objects to create > 100 then issue warning to operator" or so).
Karthoo (2019-02-21 11:09:43+00:00): The same happened in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67412441 with Express Oil Service Centers
Nmxosm (2019-02-21 06:38:42+00:00): Hallo Saihttam26,

kannst du bitte erklären, welchen Vorteil das Aufteilen von Straßen deiner Meinung nach bringt? Ich sehe darin vor allem eine unnötige Datenkomplexität, die das Pflegen und verarbeiten von OSM erschwert. 

VlG Nmxosm
Saihttam26 (2019-02-21 11:58:18+00:00): Auch hier wollte ich die Routenplanung verbessern, da man aus südlicher Richtung von der Oppenheimer Landstraße kommend nur nach rechts in die Schweizer Straße abbiegen, nicht aber um den Kreisel herumfahren kann.
Wenn diese Änderung mehr Probleme als Vorteile bringt, kanns sie auch gerne rückgängig gemacht werden. Vielleicht kannst du es ja auch so einstellen, dass es nicht zu unnötigen Komplikationen mit anderen Daten kommt. Ich habe gerade erst hier angefangen. Sorry!
Prince Kassad (2019-02-21 20:02:07+00:00): Hab mal einen Marker gesetzt, da ist mehr im Argen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1688782

Der Edit ist nur Symptombekämpfung und behebt nicht die eigentliche Ursache.
Saihttam26 (2019-02-21 22:31:57+00:00): Man kann es auch so lösen, wie bei der Einmündung des Oppenheimer Landstraße auf der Nordseite des Schweizer Platzes, wenn das weniger Umstände verursacht.
Allerdings verstehe ich noch nicht ganz, warum die Abbiegebeschränkung Probleme verursacht bzw. warum dabei Straßen aufgeteilt wurden. Vielleicht könnte das jemand mir als Neuling erklären.
Nmxosm (2019-02-22 12:13:27+00:00): Ich habe jetzt mal auf Basis der hier genannten Fakten, Mapillary und Luftbildern die Situation angepasst: https://osm.org/changeset/67463753

Wie von Saihttam26 vorgeschlagen, endet die Oppenheimer Landstraße jetzt in der Abbiegespur in Richtung Schweizer Straße. Außerdem habe ich die Wege wieder zusammengefügt und noch Abbiegebeschränkungen an der Schweizer Straße hinzugefügt. Wenden ist da ja nicht möglich. Aus junction=roundabout habe ich oneway=yes gemacht.

VlG Nmxosm
Saihttam26 (2019-02-22 20:25:47+00:00): So sieht es für mich richtig aus. 
Vielen Dank!
Commodoortje (2019-02-21 07:36:30+00:00): Revert due to ignorance
eggie (2019-02-21 07:48:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-02-21 07:57:28+00:00): Dag martijn, Je vraagt om een review. Het zit er netjes uit. De laatste trap was wat aan de lange kant. Die heb ik wat ingekort. 
MVG,
Eggie
mueschel (2019-02-21 09:27:50+00:00): Hi,
you added several reference numbers here.

ref:FASTEIGNAHEITI=Hafnarstræti 14
ref:HEITI_NF=Hafnarstræti
ref:HNITNUM=10045480
ref:HUSNR=14

The page about this import doesn't say anything about these tags. Are they actually needed in OSM?

And: The tag "import=yes" should be on the changeset, but not on the individual objects.

Jan
Staðfangaskrá_import (2019-02-22 18:57:43+00:00): Thanks for the comment. Correct, those refs were added in the test run, they will be removed shortly and not added in the rest of the project. However, in talking with Jóhannes, who did the original import, he suggested including ref:HTNINUMR going forward, which is the unique ID of the address from Staðfangaskrá. That way you can check back with the data source.
mueschel (2019-02-22 19:18:11+00:00): Thanks for the reply. One ref seems useful but the rest seems not needed.
mueschel (2019-02-27 13:15:44+00:00): Hi,
you added a key "align" to several golf objects - this is not used in any other place, what does it mean?

Thanks,
Jan
viloan (2019-02-21 03:13:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
arvind_1 (2019-04-03 10:07:42+00:00): Hi  Hanif Al Husaini,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across way 547195503, way 642459433, way 642459439, way 619027091, way 642459436 and way 619347718 classified as 'primary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'tertiary'.

and for the way 671952041, way 671952040 and way 671952039 this seems to be 'unclassified'

Making necessary changes, please revert if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.