piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tarta (2021-01-29 02:49:14+00:00): Tranquilo, eu estava esperando para fazer essa edição tem uns 6 meses desde que a ponte foi finalizada e foi dado o início do aterro para o encabeçamento
aceman444 (2022-01-18 22:13:56+00:00): Zdravim, pisete, ze ste pridali maximalne povolene rychlosti, ale namiesto toho ste zmenili ulice na obytne zony, co ma podla zakona aj dalsie implikacie ako len maximalnu rychlost=20 km/h. A napr. na ulici Stvrt SNP v roku 2019 ziadne rychlostne obmedzenie nebolo. Uz tam je nejaka znacka? Viete tieto zmeny dolozit? Pisete, ze obhliadna na mieste (survey), tak aka je tam presne dopravna znacka?

Aka je to zona 50? "SK:zone50" Vsetky ulice (residential) na Slovensku maju automaticky podla zakona rychlost 50km/h (ak sa neuvedie inak), tak pochybujem, ze tam je znacka "zona 50".
aceman444 (2022-01-18 22:19:46+00:00): Ak na ceste nie je znacka "obytna zona"  (https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoznam_dopravn%C3%BDch_zna%C4%8Diek_na_Slovensku#/media/S%C3%BAbor:315_Obytn%C3%A1_z%C3%B3na.svg), tak si tam prosim highway=living_street nevymyslajte. Je to normalna ulica. Ak sa Vam zda, ze tam nie je mozne dostahnut rychlost 50km/h (ale takych moze byt vacsina ulic) mozete tam dat "maxspeed:practical=cislo", ze kolko sa tam da realne dosiahnut.
barkat sara (2021-04-17 00:44:46+00:00): Cabinet Psychiatre
Psychotherapie
Psychiatre
Pedopsychiatre
JayTurnr (2021-01-28 23:23:38+00:00): I found so many damn duplicates here
Burricane (2021-02-03 17:20:17+00:00): Hello Tómas Ingi!

I noticed that you have made some recent edits to ref networks and road classifications in Reykjavik. I’m curious about some of the changes, because they don’t seem to be supported by the most recent Vegaskrá from 2020: http://www.vegagerdin.is/vefur2.nsf/Files/Vegaskra_2020/$file/Vegaskra_2020.xlsx and http://www.vegagerdin.is/media/vegakerfid/Vidhengi_nr.xlsx. By my understanding, the Viðhengi lists highways that will be managed by local municipalities, but have not been formally returned to them, according to the description here: http://www.vegagerdin.is/vegakerfid/vegaskra/. To me, this disclaimer suggests the `ref` tags should remain in place. Do you have additional knowledge I might not be aware of to make these changes?

Thanks, I am curious to hear your thoughts!
Burricane
Tómas Ingi (2021-02-03 17:37:21+00:00): Hi Burricane,

That's true, I forgot to look at the addendum!

I suppose that it's a matter of judgement whether these roads should be considered a part of the national highway network, since they are de jure managed (or supposed to be managed) by the local municipalities; does the highway number go when it is formally handed over is it no longer relevant already? I'm personally not sure which is better.
Burricane (2021-02-04 18:35:00+00:00): Hello again Tómas Ingi!

I think it would be best to retain these refs until they are formally returned to the local municipality and removed from the addendum. That's how I interpret the statement on http://www.vegagerdin.is/vegakerfid/vegaskra/. Alternatively, the loc_ref tag may be suitable (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref#Key_variations) but I am not confident that is totally appropriate and I think it would be best if there was agreement from the greater Icelandic OSM Community before committing to that scheme. What are your thoughts on this?

Thanks!
Burricane
Tómas Ingi (2021-02-05 10:46:33+00:00): Hi,

That sounds good; we'll add the ref/network tags to those roads which are still formally administered by Vegagerðin.
Burricane (2021-02-08 22:58:58+00:00): Hi Tómas Ingi,

I went ahead and added the refs back into the map, based on the Vegagerðin spreadsheets and what previously existed in the data. Let me know if you notice any problems with changes and we can come up with a solution. Thank you for the help, it’s much appreciated! 

Burricane
blincoln (2021-03-05 14:39:53+00:00): Hello,
The road area introduced with this street level photo is interpreted by both OSRM and some map rendering as a road (so a fork of the highway into three lanes and then back).
Is this area defined correctly? Should it be marked as highway?
km2bp (2021-03-05 15:09:11+00:00): Thanks a lot. Error removed. Yes you are right. Sometimes you have to wait a few months to see how the mobile navigation will display the changes made. Roads can also be marked as areas. I just tried to attach a photo to the road section in such a way that the road is not divided into sections. It was not a good idea. I already know what not to do. https://photos.app.goo.gl/PCTZxngdXsXuZ3qB8
4004 (2021-02-01 02:09:53+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit. please note the warnings (which should show up in josm as well) due to your extension overlapping with buildings
TheJAwesome1 (2021-02-01 17:35:52+00:00): Thanks for catching that! I'll make sure to be more careful moving forward with edits.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:38:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
ququruzka (2021-01-29 15:00:06+00:00): добрий день. 
ви би нге могли писати більш точніші коментарії до своїх правок ? 
"все" - це нічого не означає точно.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:56:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
marc__marc (2021-03-04 17:21:18+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8373672305
si cet endroit représente l'endroit oü s'arrête le bus, il doit faire partie de la route.
si cet endroit représente l'endroit où les piétons attendent, alors il y a une erreur de tag.
Cordialement,
Marc
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SHARCRASH (2021-01-29 01:28:42+00:00): + tags corrected on Serbian Center
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:27:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:36:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:29:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
user_5359 (2021-01-29 04:36:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/516619392: There is a typical Potlach error. What is the meaning of the key (new tag)?
alain2003 (2021-01-29 11:16:02+00:00): indeed an error would be 
name:en=Tamri
DressyPear4 (2021-01-30 23:30:27+00:00): Olá, a via só deve ser dividida se houver um canteiro central, você pode ver mais detalhes sobre ciclovias nesse artigo
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:23:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:40:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:34:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:47:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:39:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:56:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:26:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:48:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:29:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:42:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:29:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
seattlefyi (2021-01-29 20:37:06+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the edit! Looks like you did a great job editing this -- thanks for leaving the address tags. I think the only suggestion I'd made is removing the cuisine=pizza tag. Otherwise, looks perfect! Thanks again.
IanH (2021-02-06 01:56:20+00:00): Looks good bit its hard to tell how well the current imagery is aligned with the existing ways.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98328731
Glassman (2021-01-29 23:25:40+00:00): Tip: If you know the local name use that instead of the english name. The english name can be add using the tag name:en=Fort House.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98328839
ScottWalkerAU (2021-01-29 05:48:46+00:00): Confirming library is closed for good
ScottWalkerAU (2021-01-29 05:49:05+00:00): Confirming buildings are in the process of being demolished
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:49:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al