piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:49:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
muchichka_s (2021-03-24 15:47:31+00:00): Hello Burricane

Your reclassification looks a bit suspicious. The main traffic is directed from the city bypass (M-08) in the direction of the border/customs
Burricane (2021-03-25 17:50:51+00:00): Hello muchichka_s,

After looking at this intersection some more, I agree. I did not originally notice that there was a priority road sign (Mapillary link below) showing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533165270 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533165269 are better left as Trunk roads. I have undone these classification changes.

Thanks,
Burricane

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ouoKLPWbnfU08K8dgxm8TA
MTB FORIS (2021-03-25 07:26:31+00:00): This is a macadam well-maintained part of the road that pedestrians and cyclists pass through, just physically made by the owner so that tourists can reach the artificial lake, Lake Toplik. All this is a complex of picnic areas that is under construction, because the owner has installed several tables and benches, which are covered, located in the pleasant shade of the surrounding forest. All this is in agreement with the owner part of the complex of the bicycle park MTB City road.
bxl-forever (2021-03-24 16:50:04+00:00): Hello,
Wouldn’t highway=footway be more appropriate than this whole collection of access tags?
What do you think?
eggie (2021-03-24 16:57:03+00:00): Dag Dmitnin.. Wanneer weer opengesteld is kan dan de barrier=fence er af bij de aansluiting met het Pier de Coubertinpad?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-24 18:14:41+00:00): De hekken heb ik even verwijderd..
Gr eggie
Dmitnin (2021-03-24 21:07:13+00:00): Ja, zeker! Ik wist dat er een hek was maar kon het niet vinden. Dank je wel!
eggie (2021-03-24 21:09:49+00:00): Er waren er twee, maar als fence op een node gemapt.. Ze zijn weg nu :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:56:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
DressyPear4 (2021-03-24 20:36:12+00:00): Olá, árvores individuais podem ser mapeadas como apenas um ponto.
Você pode usar  Copiar e Colar para facilitar o trabalho.
trigpoint (2021-03-29 19:43:11+00:00): Hi, a oneway street on which there is a node prohibiting motor vehicles seems a bit odd. Are you sure?

Cheers Phil
elliobur (2021-03-30 07:41:10+00:00): The bridge can only be crossed from the chester road side
trigpoint (2021-03-30 07:48:51+00:00): Then the motor_vehicle=no is redundant.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-27 11:31:13+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن غير صحيحة
lucindesky (2021-03-27 23:50:15+00:00): Muchas gracias por mapear Burundi @Aferpo Después de revisar tus ediciones del pasado Mapatón, creo que vas muy bien. Recordarte que por regla general, hay que escuadrar los edificios. Cuando un camino o sendero llega hasta una casa, ten cuidado de que no se monte el camino sobre la casa, ni que compartan nodos. No deben estar conectados. 
He visto que has cogido soltura con el mapeo de vías de comunicación. Te dejo algunas recomendaciones para que sigas avanzando. El etiquetado de vías no es difícil. Si la vía no permite el paso de vehículos de 4 ruedas (esto es subjetivo) es un sendero; las vías que permiten el paso de vehículos de 4 ruedas: si unen zonas con edificios son “camino menor/sin clasificación”, si sólo conducen a campos, bosques, ríos, … son “pista o camino rural”. Échale un vistazo a esta página de la clasificación de las vías en África. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Highway_Tag_Africa.  
Muy buen trabajo, sigue mapeando!
Lucía
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101661721
L'imaginaire (2021-03-24 22:05:29+00:00): Hi AquilaBE, good question! I've asked around on our chat channel (https://matrix.to/#/+osmbe:matrix.org) and this is the recap:
It is up to the routing algorithm to decide whether a certain type of road / path should be avoided or not based on the tagging. So the best thing to do is to tag the properties of this path as detailed as possible. The width=... tag is definitely useful here (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width). Specific hazards can also be tagged with hazard=... (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hazard).

There are some other tags to indicate how 'difficult' roads or paths are to use (e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sac_scale and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness), but I suppose these would be less suitable here. Do not hesitate to ask further questions!
NieleGeypens (2021-03-27 11:53:12+00:00): Hi, I did not map this, but it must be one of the only places in Alken I have never been.
After seeing it on OSM I tried multiple times to see it from inside the train but this is impossible.
Problably this mondayafternoon I will go see the location on foot and take some pictures to post here.
AquilaBE (2021-03-27 17:10:54+00:00): Hi, you can find a photo at following link: https://imgur.com/a/zhI8KF6
The best way to find the tunnel, is to follow Voetweg 109. You have to walk halfway up the grading of the railway, over the Herk, down the stairs.
I used Komoot to plan a running session, which led me here. On screen, I thought it was the old connection of the Molenveldstraat (long time ago it was linked next to the Paenhuisstraat 30). It was not :)
NieleGeypens (2021-03-28 19:09:35+00:00): Personally I find it that dangerously.

I measured the tunnel and path, See pictures with scales:
htps://imgur.com/a/uq9P2b8

The tunnelroof is 207cm and the path in the tunnel is 69cm wide and the tunnel is 39m36cm long.
NieleGeypens (2021-03-28 19:10:05+00:00): https://imgur.com/a/uq9P2b8
GinaroZ (2021-03-24 21:48:24+00:00): What's the reasoning behind changing the cycleway alongside the tram into a footway and bicycle=no?
Niall_Kerr (2021-03-25 00:38:25+00:00): It was incorrectly listed as a cycle path only. Is there an option to make it shared?
FrenchyF (2021-05-03 18:56:45+00:00): Tagging as "highway=cycleway" and "foot=yes" accomplishes this. Legally, you're allowed to walk on cycle paths, so anything listed as a cycle path is automatically shared use.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-12 22:36:55+00:00): an atm in the middle of the sea? please, man
lucindesky (2021-03-27 23:13:03+00:00): Gracias por mapear Burundi @amyyosky Después de revisar tus ediciones del pasado Mapatón, sólo recordarte que por regla general, hay que escuadrar los edificios. Pueden ser cuadrados, rectangulares o en forma de L, pero en raras ocasiones tendrán ángulos distintos de 90º. La secuencia más fácil para que no se te pase, es trazar--> etiquetar--> escuadrar. 
Si quieres seguir avanzando, te dejo algunos consejos para mapear vías. El etiquetado de vías no es difícil. Si la vía no permite el paso de vehículos de 4 ruedas (esto es subjetivo) es un sendero; las vías que permiten el paso de vehículos de 4 ruedas: si unen zonas con edificios son “camino menor/sin clasificación”, si sólo conducen a campos, bosques, ríos, … son “pista o camino rural”.
Sigue mapeando!
Lucía
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101663376
Ludhiana (2021-03-27 17:16:03+00:00): Are you following the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?
user_5359 (2021-03-24 18:17:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
GinaroZ (2021-03-24 21:41:48+00:00): Why have you deleted all of these trees?
Niall_Kerr (2021-03-25 00:42:04+00:00): Decluttering. The single tree node is for isolated trees. I didn’t feel an entire wooded area, as none were isolated or significant, required 100s of tree points when a natural wood area designation would suffice.
ivanbranco (2025-05-23 05:57:21+00:00): Ciao Peter,

un utente ha scritto di non aver trovate delle grotte da te mappate, esistono? Riesci a dargli riscontro?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4771134
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4771141

grazie e buon mapping
lucindesky (2021-03-27 22:56:23+00:00): Gracias por mapear Burundi @APP448. Después de revisar tus ediciones del pasado Mapatón, creo que vas muy bien. Sólo, recordarte que por regla general, hay que escuadrar los edificios. Veo que todavía no te has lanzado a trazar vías de comunicación. El etiquetado de vías no es difícil. Si la vía no permite el paso de vehículos de 4 ruedas (esto es subjetivo) es un sendero; las vías que permiten el paso de vehículos de 4 ruedas: si unen zonas con edificios son “camino menor/sin clasificación”, si sólo conducen a campos, bosques, ríos, … son “pista o camino rural”. Échale un vistazo a esta página de la clasificación de las vías en África. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Highway_Tag_Africa. 
Buen trabajo, sigue mapeando!
Lucía
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101664685
lucindesky (2021-03-27 22:35:03+00:00): Gracias por mapear Burundi @aismaelp. Después de revisar la ediciones del pasado Mapatón, creo que vas muy bien. Sigue así! He visto que has tenido que desplazar algunos edificios. No olvides siempre trabajar con las imágenes que pide el proyecto. En este caso, las de Bing. Muy buen trabajo, sigue mapeando! Lucía.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101664940
eggie (2022-11-23 12:01:07+00:00): Tag Reigi..

Ein Anfänger hat Ihre highway=path wieder entfernt.

Stimmt es das sich hier kein offiziell highway=path befindet?  


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129276026#map=18/50.95126/5.89561

und

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129276026

Gruss,
eggie
reigi (2022-11-23 15:02:53+00:00): Hallo eggie,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich hatte den Hinweis in diesem CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125672421#map=16/50.9518/5.8937 gesehen und wollte das demnächst einmal vor Ort prüfen. Im Mai 2021, als ich die Wege getaggt habe, waren sie deutlich erkennbar und auch deutlich genutzt. Also auch nach dem OTG-Prinzip richtig gemappt. Wie sollen wir denn auch als Erfasser beurteilen können, ob Wege illegal sind oder nicht? Du hast das in deinem Kommentar genau richtig ausgedrückt. Warten wir mal ab, ob und wenn ja wie der User sein Entfernen begründet.

Viele Grüße

Reigi
eggie (2022-11-23 15:16:25+00:00): Hoi Reigi...

Falls wir nichts hören, werde ich den Änderungssatz später zurücksetzen.

Und das hier war ich schon vergessen :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125672421#map=16/50.9518/5.8937 

Ich kann es Martin Borsje fragen. Er weiss gewiss Bescheid dort.
Jedenfalls routiert das Voetpad aan de lange Rijn jetzt auch nicht. 

Grüss
eggie
eggie (2022-11-23 15:23:19+00:00): Martin um Auskunft gefragt.
reigi (2022-11-23 15:25:44+00:00): Ja prima, vielleicht schau ich es mir in Kürze auch noch mal selbst an und mach dann auch Fotos.
eggie (2022-11-23 15:29:16+00:00): Ich habe es gerade revertiert. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129276026

Werde mahl sehen  oder ist das  kein Deutch?
eggie (2022-11-23 15:29:38+00:00): typo Deutsch
eggie (2022-11-23 15:57:12+00:00): Martin hat es gerade geändert.. 
'Voetpad aan de lange Rijn' is jetzt ein Fussweg.. In dem Gebied is 'Radfahen und MTB  verboten.
Mapper Spamark hatte vorher Kontakt mit Martin.

Gruss
eggie
eggie (2022-11-23 16:01:10+00:00): Es gab auch noch ein 'note' hier.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3452706#map=17/50.95202/5.89690&layers=N

Das habe ich leider später aufgemerkt.
reigi (2022-11-23 16:35:38+00:00): Doch Eggie, könnte ich so gut niederländisch schreiben wie du Deutsch wäre ich froh. Das meiste was, was in niederländisch geschrieben ist, verstehe ich ganz gut. So wie ich Martin verstanden habe, hat er die Pfade im Bos entfernt. Das fände ich aber nicht richtig, da sie ja (zur Zeit noch) vorhanden sind (also OTG). Wir Unser können ja nicht erkennen, ob sie nicht auch zu den Wegen gehören auf denen man bleiben soll. Vielleicht später mal wenn sie eventuell wieder zugewachsen sind auf abandoned setzen.
lucindesky (2021-03-27 23:25:52+00:00): Muchas gracias por mapear Burundi @JIEscavy. Después de revisar tus ediciones del pasado Mapatón creo que vas muy bien. Sigue así! He visto que has mapeado algún camino sin conectarlo al resto de la red de comunicación. Recuerda que estamos mapeando para poder llegar a las comunidades y hogares de esta región. Para ello, todas las vías deben de estar conectadas, creando una red. Te recomiendo, que de vez en cuando alejes el zoom para tener una visión más global de los que estás mapeando. Buen trabajo, sigue mapeando!
Lucía
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101665528
kuhni74 (2021-09-13 10:29:55+00:00): Was machen wir mit der doppelten Karlreut / Karlreit (westlich nochmal vorhanden)? Es handelt sich ja wohl um eine Rodung des Karl, die wird ja wohl flächenmäßig ausdehnter gewesen sein?
kuhni74 (2021-09-13 10:32:37+00:00): Und die mutmaßliche Steinleiten? Ich vermute dafür den OSO-exponierten Hang (siehe auch Administrativ-Karte), der ist im Laserscan auffällig schroff und wirkt daher recht geeignet für diesen Namen.
fkv (2021-09-13 11:05:09+00:00): Für solche Fragen ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/stg56 der kompetentere Ansprechpartner. Von ihm hab ich eine lokale Karte, in der viele Namen eingezeichnet sind, u.a. auch die Karlreit. Dass ReinerMeyer eine Karlreut schon woanders eingetragen hatte, ist mir glaub ich hinterher noch aufgefallen, aber sicher genug um seinen Node zu löschen war ich mir dann auch nicht. Die Steinleiten habe ich wegen Zweifelhaftigkeit bewusst nicht nach OSM übernommen.
kuhni74 (2021-09-13 11:16:42+00:00): Vielen Dank! Ich frage ihn! Die Steinleiten ist ja auch in der Administrativ-Karte allgemein zugänglich, ich erlaube mir, den Ort ein wenig nach Osten zu schieben.
whb (2021-09-13 10:46:03+00:00): Guten Tag,

das ist KEINE Selbstversorgerhütte mit Schlafplätzen und Feuerstelle.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism=wilderness_hut
Verbessert.

Viele Grüße
whb
lucindesky (2021-03-27 23:36:08+00:00): Gracias por mapear Burundi @Evamore Después de revisar tus ediciones del pasado Mapatón, sólo recordarte, como ya sabes, que por regla general hay que escuadrar los edificios. Pueden ser cuadrados, rectangulares o en forma de L, pero en raras ocasiones tendrán ángulos distintos de 90º. La secuencia más fácil para que no se te pase, es trazar--> etiquetar--> escuadrar.  

Si quieres seguir avanzando, te dejo algunos consejos para mapear vías. El etiquetado de vías no es difícil. Si la vía no permite el paso de vehículos de 4 ruedas (esto es subjetivo) es un sendero; las vías que permiten el paso de vehículos de 4 ruedas: si unen zonas con edificios son “camino menor/sin clasificación”, si sólo conducen a campos, bosques, ríos, … son “pista o camino rural”. Por si todavía no le has echado un vistazo te dejo también la página con la clasificación de las vías en África. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Highway_Tag_Africa
Muy buen trabajo, sigue mapeando!
Lucía
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101666588
TomPar (2021-03-28 06:09:42+00:00): Hello.  What is your goal with this changeset?  For instance, your new relation 12487256 is basically a duplicate of preexisting relation 12422350.  It's redundant data and messy.  I'm happy to chat further regarading your mapping goals.  Thanks.
Hamhock666 (2021-03-28 16:36:30+00:00): Hey, I've been comparing with state parcel data and this conservation area (Bakerfields 29676823) doesn't seem to exist anymore, the import is from 12 years ago, while the last sold data was in 2016.

As for relation 12487256, I added some water in the woods, but it didn't seem correct to have the water covered in trees, so I merged the features with the woods way, but it still shows up in the renderer looking like there are trees in the water. Do you know the correct way to handle this? Thanks
TomPar (2021-03-28 20:11:01+00:00): There's a couple of things going on.

A decade ago or more, someone did a big import of MassGIS "Open Space" data.  This contained both public parcels like state parks but also privately owned parcels that have conservation restrictions (CRs) but NO public access.  Someone made the (questionable) decision a while ago to tag these as "leisure=nature_reserve" or "recreation_ground".  Bad idea IMHO.  They get sucked up by third-party apps like Gaia and AllTrails and they get rendered in green so they LOOK like there is public access.  I've been slowly removing these types of private CRs because I don't think they have much value to the average data consumer and furthermore they are ripe for misunderstandings.  I believe this "Bakerfields" parcel has always been private, it just has a permanent CR on it too.  It was good you removed it.

As far as land cover: land cover mapping in OSM is pretty messed up IMHO.  The "nature=wood" rendering has two components: a solid green fill color and a different render layer for those little trees.  For reasons I don't completely understand those two components get treated differently.  Mapping a pond on top of a large "wood" area will put the blue of the pond on top of the green, but the "trees" icons get mapped over the pond.  Makes no sense to me.

The "right" way to do land cover mapping involves complex "multipolygon" relations where you "cut out" every single little pond and marsh and field and whatever from the larger "wood".

In this example, you should have modified the existing relation 12422350 to do what you want.  You'll likely find JOSM is a far superior tool for doing this type of thing.

Land cover mapping in the US is somewhat divisive with the OSM community.  I personally largely don't do it because almost everything is covered with trees in MA anyways.  What's the value?  Especially considering land cover mapping is now more-and-more automated with AI.

Anyways...unfortunately OSM still has a long way to go to make all of this more straightforward.  Mapping practice norms are somewhat varied...even within the state.

Happy mapping...
PLima785 (2021-03-25 15:37:33+00:00): Boa tarde Bezugo
Antes de mais obrigado pelas suas edições.
Reparei nesta sua edição e quero alertar para que existe uma padronização para as vias.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Padronização

Aproveito também para deixar o canal no telegram:
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cordialmente,
Pedro Lima
PT-53 (2021-03-25 06:42:31+00:00): Hallo SuperFlomm,
die Herabstufung dieser Straßen
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/424491422/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31097540/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30970843/history
von unclassified auf residential halte ich nicht für angemessen. Dort sind jeweils reine Gewerbegebiete.
Bitte schaue Dir das nochmal an.
Grüße
SuperFlomm (2021-04-03 13:44:46+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
die Straßen habe ich herabgestuft, weil diese Straßen wenig bis keinen Durchgangsverkehr aufweisen.
Innerorts würde ich unclassified eher für Straßen verwenden, die ein höheres Verkehrsaufkommen haben, und die restlichen Straßen mit residential markieren.
PT-53 (2021-04-03 17:15:30+00:00): Hallo SuperFlomm, 
>>> residential wird für Anliegerstraßen benutzt, die Siedlungsgebiete erschließen <<<
Ein Gewerbegebiet ist kein Siedlingsgebiet (Wohngebiet).
Grüße
PT-53 (2021-04-18 07:49:35+00:00): Hallo SuperFlomm, 
ich habe Deine o.g. Änderungen von unclassified auf residedential wieder zurückgesetzt.
Grüße
rskedgell (2021-03-24 19:27:00+00:00): I suspect the issue may be the shared node with the Limehouse Link (already layer=-2), which may be treated as a junction. Setting layer=1 on the path should not be necessary.
Caroline F (2021-03-24 22:39:56+00:00): Thanks - I hadn't realised it shared a node with the LL, obviously it shouldn't. I was really trying to change it from a cycle path (as it isn't and it's causing problems with cyclists being fined). However when I didn't see that change appearing I wondered if it was because of the warning on the levels so I though I would update that. The oath genuinely does go under an overhanging part of the Dunbar Wharf building.
rskedgell (2021-03-25 10:54:34+00:00): I'm sure I've run and walked through there a few times.

The "cyclists dismount" sign and cycle barrier are visible on Mapillary imagery, so I've added those. I have also disconnected the footways from the tunnels, as there were two shared nodes.

Some of the cycle routing problems may have been due to another mapper, who concentrates on long distance footpaths, changing footway/cycleway to path. Unfortunately, path doesn't have any default access assumptions unless access tags are added explicitly. I've reverted these to their previous types.

These changes may take a few weeks to work as expected in routing services like Komoot and Strava.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101711056
eggie (2021-03-24 19:15:16+00:00): Nu een edit in Nederland..  daarom alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2021-03-28 11:40:35+00:00): Please check & fix the issues raised by the JOSM validator before uploading. There was a huge amount of unconnected or wrongly tagged highways here.
DamonMonyo_ImportAccount (2021-03-29 10:55:04+00:00): Thanks a lot for raised me in this problem,let me promise that it w'll not repeated again,it w'll be fixed soon as possible.
DamonMonyo_ImportAccount (2021-03-29 11:00:01+00:00): THanks a lot for raised me in this problem,I promise that it w'll not repeated again but it will be fixed soon as possible.
Sanniu (2021-03-25 06:36:45+00:00): Hi, I beg you, please, give meaningful names to your changesets!
MxxCon (2021-03-25 02:11:18+00:00): Hello.
Is there an updated nyc parks web page for this new garden?
Avm241 (2021-03-25 12:59:40+00:00): We try to keep updated names on our Find a Garden page: https://greenthumb.nycgovparks.org/gardensearch.php    Although the gardens are managed on a day-to-day basis by volunteers, so they have the ability to change their names and sometimes due during a season.
UTF-8 (2021-07-01 17:18:15+00:00): in diesem Änderungssatz hast du den Dehner-Gartenmarkt vermutlich versehentlich auf die freie Wiese gesetzt. wenn dem so ist, bitte einfach wieder zurücksetzten. (Ich habe jetzt nicht vor Ort nachgesehen, ob Dehner noch an der alten Stelle ist, aber ich vermute schon.)
LorenzoStucchi (2021-03-27 18:00:51+00:00): Thanks for the mapping. It is important to do not delete the elements that are mapped by other users
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101669525
NieWnen (2021-03-24 19:33:16+00:00): Dzięki za zmianę od mieszkańca! Mam 3 drobne uwagi: 
1. Jakaś dziwna linia się pojawiła bez tagów (921821834). 
2. Zostały usunięte tagi sklepu, ale zostało "information=Lotto", jeśli kolektura nadal istnieje, to powinno się dodać shop=lottery, jeśli nie, można usunąć ten punkt (3069821125). 
3. Do paczkomatu, warto też dodać identyfikator ref, w tym przypadku będzie to prawodpodobnie OLS19A.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101669542
StefanHRT (2021-03-25 06:02:01+00:00): Hello grelus, The pictures there are no longer correct, there were some changes in the fall of 2020. I drive there on the weekend long (with bike), make current pictures and then set it right again. Best regards