piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-24 23:48:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:39:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
InfosReseaux (2019-12-21 14:45:28+00:00): Bonjour

Merci d'avoir pris le temps d'ajouter tout ces sites électriques, il y a vraiment beaucoup dans la zone.

Ces modifications posent toutefois un problème : les postes électriques se cartographient avec power=substation et non power=transformer (bien qu'en français on ait l'habitude de dire "le transformateur" en parlant du bâtiment).
power=transformer est un appareil à l'intérieur de chaque poste, qu'il n'est pas nécessaire de faire figurer sur OSM dans ces cas de figure.

Est-ce possible de reprendre tout ces bâtiment on y ajoutant les tags suivant :
power=substation
substation=minor_distribution
operator=Enedis
voltage=20000 (ou voltage=20000;400 si préféré)
S'il vous plait ?

Cela permettra de régler un grand nombre d'erreurs Osmose et d'améliorer significativement le rendu de cartes comme http://www.openinframap.org

Merci par avance
François
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:45:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-11-26 09:02:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
osmviborg (2018-11-26 09:08:45+00:00): Skulle havde været: Rettelser til 'Kattegat' Kilde: http://denstoredanske.dk/Danmarks_geografi_og_historie/Danmarks_geografi/Indre_danske_farvande/Kattegat
geozeisig (2018-11-26 10:55:43+00:00): Thanks
mueschel (2018-11-26 11:56:47+00:00): Please watch out for the correct spelling of keys. I found ~60x "adrdr:city" which I just corrected to "addr:city"
mavl (2019-07-21 12:07:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Luzandro (2018-11-26 17:27:30+00:00): Hallo Raphty,
der ID-Editor rastet standardmäßig in der Nähe von anderen Linien ein und erzeugt eine Verbindung mit deiner neuen Linie. Bei Straßen möchtest du diese Kreuzungspunkte natürlich haben, in deinem Fall hier wurde dadurch aber die Reitanlage  mit der Bezirksgrenze und ein paar Wegen verbunden, was man eigentlich nicht haben möchte. Um das zu vermeiden musst du beim Zeichnen die Alt-Taste gedrückt halten - du siehst auch an der Hervorhebung des anderen Objekts, wann ein Verbindungspunkt angelegt wird.
Ich habe die problematischen Verbindungen wieder gelöst.
LG Andreas
mavl (2018-12-25 00:16:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Frans S (2018-12-14 11:27:29+00:00): Hello Yasin, I am reviewing this task and have a remark.
When a waterway crossed a highway with a bridge (highway) don't add a layer=-1 on a piece waterway. The bridge tag layer=1 is sufficient. Thanks for mapping
Yasin Rahaman (2018-12-20 04:23:56+00:00): Hello Frans S,
Thank for your remarks.
DemoLogin (2019-06-23 20:33:12+00:00): Аналогичный случай, но решение противоположное.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71439337
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402889926
Luzandro (2018-11-26 17:28:32+00:00): Hallo Raphty,
bitte verwende keine generischen Beschreibungen wie "Schrebergärten" oder "Heuriger" als Name
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Wenn du im ID-Editor beim Objekttyp nach "Schrebergärten" suchst, wird dir auch die entsprechende Landnutzung "Kleingartenanlage" vorgeschlagen, das habe ich jetzt auch schon geändert.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:35:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:21:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:30:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:08:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:30:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Phyks (2018-11-26 10:16:27+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM,

Je ne connais pas le terrain donc je ne peux pas commenter l'exactitude de la modification vis à vis de la réalité du terrain.

En revanche, après cette modification, il reste encore au moins deux portions de l'Avenue Doyen Louis Trotabas, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/195991049 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25307287. Est-ce volontaire ?

Bonne journée,
ReMqL (2018-11-26 13:40:28+00:00): Bonjour,

De ce que j'ai pu voir ce weekend en passant dans ce quartier avec OSM allumé, la rue après avoir quitté l'Avenue d'Estienne D'Orves s'appelle bien Rue Robert Schuman sur une portion avant de devenir l'avenue Doyen Louis Trotabas. Je n'ai d'ailleurs pas très bien compris la raison de changement de nom de cette rue...
Je peux si nécessaire refaire un tour dans le quartier à l'occasion avec un GPS pour confirmer la limite entre la Rue Robert Schuman et l'Avenue Doyen Louis Trotabas.

Cordialement,
Phyks (2018-11-26 19:59:19+00:00): Ok. Il peut être utile d'appliquer le nommage plus finement (en notant les portions de rues avec les noms), si possible.

En l'état, je renommerai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25307287 avec le nom "Rue Robert Schuman". Cette section (surlignée en orange sur le lien précédent) et la section parallèle sont a priori la même section de rue (avec une séparation des voies de circulation). J'imagine qu'elles devraient porter le même nom.

Cordialement,
mavl (2019-07-21 12:07:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Jakka (2018-11-26 13:45:37+00:00): Indien F12a staat is het een living_street. Best bij vermelden dan maxspeed=20
thx
mueschel (2018-11-26 18:51:27+00:00): Bitte lösche keine Daten, nur weil irgendeine Software ein Problem hat. Das ist übrigens definitiv ein Software-Bug in deinem Router, da diese Fahrstrecke durch folgende Relation verboten ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8686837
mavl (2018-12-25 00:38:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
murble (2019-01-08 23:25:55+00:00): Please revert this, the Bing streetside imginary is very old, if you look at recent imaginary or walk down there you will see there is now a road way and a new development on what was once waste ground.
sskalyan (2019-01-09 07:24:10+00:00): Thanks for the update, Murble. We have reverted the edit and changed it back to Residential road. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.
Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
nevw (2018-11-26 11:00:47+00:00): Hi
you have placed the business in the carpark. It is expected that you place it over the building you operate from.
nevw (2018-11-30 04:20:05+00:00): Shifted business on to correct building, corrected hours format
mavl (2018-12-24 23:39:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
nevw (2018-11-26 11:15:36+00:00): This business appears to be placed in the wrong location - on a vacant block with an incorrect street number from the latest info available to me.
You are expected to be based at a real physical building location and place you business details on it.
If you don't have that to offer, it is unsuitable to add the the OSM.
nevw (2018-11-30 04:22:44+00:00): no response, reverted.
pio2_122 (2018-11-26 18:32:47+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś 	bicycle=designated ze ścieżek, które są na trasie szlaku rowerowego??
wajak (2018-11-26 22:10:27+00:00): Ponieważ te ścieżki nie są tylko dla rowerów i nie zostały tylko dla nich stworzone. Tutaj wystarczy oznaczenie szlaku rowerowego jako relacji do drogi. Problemem oczywiście jest mała ilość map, które taki szlak renderują, ale takie oznaczenia jak było jak niezgodne że specyfikacją i niektóre algorytmy wyznaczania tras mogłyby omijać te drogi przy nawigacji pieszej.
pio2_122 (2018-11-26 22:14:48+00:00): Rozumiem, dzięki za informację!
ndm (2018-11-26 21:27:46+00:00): Bing streetside doesn't show any u-turn restrictions -- is there any reason this shouldn't be reverted?
yaswap (2018-11-27 11:36:25+00:00): Thanks for the update,ndm . 
In some view angle of bing street side the legal median looked like a continuous one so the restriction was given. We have reverted the U-turn restriction as per your recommendation. Thank you for spending your valuable time to help us.

Please let us know if you have any recommendations or suggestions. We are always happy to engage with local OSM community and learn from them.
DD1GJ (2018-11-26 20:16:04+00:00): Hallo Soeren_87, Du hast hier fast 100 Adressen gelöscht, ohne für Ersatz an den Gebäuden zu sorgen. Daher habe ich diesen Änderungssatz komplett zurückgesetzt. Diese Art der Adressknoten ist gleichwertig mit Adressen an Gebäuden und bracht daher nicht geändert zu werden.
Soeren_87 (2018-11-27 05:42:59+00:00): Hallo DD1GJ,
wie du schon schreibst, sind die Adressknoten gleichwertig mit den Adressen an den Gebäuden. Es macht für mich keinen Sinn, über die eh schon eingezeichneten Gebäude noch eine Adresse zu legen. Ich werde die Adressknoten wieder löschen und die fehlenden Adressen bei den Gebäuden  nachtragen. Man muss den Datensatz ja nicht unnötig unübersichtlich gestalten.
DD1GJ (2018-11-27 07:19:49+00:00): Wenn zusätzliche Informationen wie Ort und PLZ hinzukommen und sichergestellt ist, dass keine Informationen verloren gehen, dann gerne. Neu gezeichnete Häuser kannst Du im Kontextmenü oder mit der Taste s rechtwinklig machen. Weitere Informationen findest Du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Jakka (2018-11-26 13:42:08+00:00): hoe noemt dit stukje ? wegen worden steeds in stukjes getekend daar ieder onderdeelke een bijkomde eigenschap kan hebben. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64892194
Jakka (2018-11-26 13:39:28+00:00): Dit is niet echt wat de wiki verwacht met square zie uitleg: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=square?uselang=nl  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/649097756#map=19/50.86122/3.27232
BCNorwich (2018-11-26 11:07:30+00:00): Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I don't really understand your changeset comment. You have put a barrier on Rowney Gardens blocking access to it from Harlow Road. Is there a physical barrier here? If not it should be removed.

If you can explain what it is you are trying to accomplish maybe someone can help.

Regards Bernard.
nuzg_1988 (2018-11-26 12:29:29+00:00): Hi Bernard,

The block was originally put on Harlow Road when in fact it was at the end of Rowney gardens. Because it was put on Harlow road, this is causing navigation to think there is a block on Harlow Road which in turn navigates around 4 miles out. so I have removed the block from Harlow road and placed it on Rowney Gardens where it should be.
BCNorwich (2018-11-26 14:37:41+00:00): Hello, I agree the barrier should not have been on Harlow Road. But my concern is, that the County Council map does not show a barrier here, nor can I see any other evidence on the web showing a barrier here. Hence my question, is there actually a physical barrier here? If not then the barrier should be removed. 

Have you actually seen the barrier? Because maybe it was mistake to place a barrier anywhere here.

Regards Bernard.
nuzg_1988 (2018-11-26 15:52:53+00:00): Hi Bernard,

I will be honest I was working on 3rd party information. We use the service for our mapping system and it was causing an issue for them. They advised there was a barrier there but they have been and checked personally and are now advising there is not barrier at all. I have since removed the barrier. Maybe someone originally added in error as you say.

Thank you for your assistance on this
Hjart (2018-11-26 11:13:32+00:00): Nu fremgår det ikke længere af kortet at bygningen her er en bygning. Jeg vil iøvrigt også anbefale at indtegne skolens grund og lægge navn mm på den istedet
Hytten33 (2018-11-26 11:53:48+00:00): ka' du ik' gør' det
Hjart (2018-11-26 11:58:09+00:00): jo, det kan jeg godt
Hjart (2018-11-26 12:01:10+00:00): Hører bygningen ud mod Sankt Peders Gade med til skolen?
Hytten33 (2018-11-26 12:14:58+00:00): Jepski depski
Hjart (2018-11-26 12:33:48+00:00): Ok, nu har jeg ændret det i databasen. Der går formentlig lige nogle minutter endnu inden ændringerne bliver at se på kortet.
Hytten33 (2018-11-26 14:35:05+00:00): Okay, mange tak. Vil gerne undskylde for min dårlige attitude - Tak for hjælpen!
Hjart (2018-11-26 15:07:14+00:00): Helt i orden. Langt de fleste begyndere skal lige have lidt tid til at finde ud af hvad vores projekt egentlig er for en størrelse 😀
R_S (2018-11-26 22:30:58+00:00): Hello there, what exactly did you change the tags? Thank you.
Hallo daar, wat heeft u precies gewijzigd de tags? Hartelijk dank.
dvdhoven (2018-11-27 06:58:32+00:00): Dat kun je met achivi zien: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64892913
monument is in OSM een gebouw dat behoudenswaardig is. Een monument, bijv. voor gevallenen in de oorlog is in OSM een memorial
Zie ook de wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
R_S (2018-11-27 10:46:35+00:00): Top, gezien bedankt voor de tips!
literan (2018-11-26 14:41:12+00:00): не совсем понимаю, зачем "Жилой комплекс" превратил в ЖК https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/568584897 - я обычно делаю наоборот, согласно https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.A1.D0.BE.D0.BA.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.89.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B8_.D0.B0.D0.B1.D0.B1.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.B2.D0.B8.D0.B0.D1.82.D1.83.D1.80.D1.8B_.28.D0.BD.D0.B5_.D0.B8.D1.81.D0.BF.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.B7.D1.83.D0.B9.D1.82.D0.B5_.D0.B8.D1.85.29 Также, вот здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3862798391 ты leisure=dance зачем-то удалил https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=dance
Felis Pimeja (2018-11-27 08:58:59+00:00): 1. ЖК - это я проверяю на что ругается Osmose. Откачу, как выясню.
2. leisure заменил на training под заброшеный пропозал amenity=training. Который тут использован. Но если считаешь leisure более уместным - возвращаю.
literan (2018-11-27 09:13:49+00:00): ну так amenity=training там уже был, и не мешал тегу leisure=dance (см. историю точки). Тегирование под две разных схемы )
eggie (2018-11-26 11:06:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-11-26 11:13:32+00:00): Het is beter niet zomaar zaken te verwijderen uit OSM. Het gebouw is een ligplaats die vanuit de BAG (Kadaster) is geïmporteerd. Deze kunnen soms beter omgezet worden naar mooring=yes access=private. De buildingtag dan verwijderen. Het vlak heeft ook een adres.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=holtenbroekerdijk%20100&resultOffset=0&objectId=0193020000050719&geometry.x=201892.09340052&geometry.y=505959.5895982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0193020000050719
MVG,
Eggie
maraf24 (2018-11-29 17:49:21+00:00): Widać wszystke przystanki tramwajowe.
matthewsheffield (2018-11-30 12:47:43+00:00): Seems reasonable. Looks like every other runway I've seem mapped.
Phyks (2018-11-26 13:00:00+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM !

Il y a un nœud qui existait au même endroit pour indiquer un magasin d'articles ménagers (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3195352348). Est-ce que ce magasin existe encore (si oui, il pourrait être utile de le compléter) ? Sinon, le nœud peut être supprimé car il a probablement été remplacé par le magasin Meurgey Orfevre.

Concernant le nouveau magasin ajouté https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6092445366, il serait utile de préciser en plus que c'est un magasin (amenity=shop, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:amenity) et le type de magasin dont il s'agit (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop).

N'hésitez pas à me faire signe en cas de doute sur mes remarques.

Bonne journée,
djacko (2018-11-26 13:22:55+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai complété la fiche existante. Je m'étais un peu emmêlé les pinceaux avec l’outil d'édition.
Phyks (2018-11-26 19:55:55+00:00): Bonjour,

Je crois que la modification n'a pas été validée. :)

Vous pouvez retrouver vos modifications ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/djacko/history et il n'y a que celle-ci.
Carto'Cité (2018-12-06 16:06:18+00:00): Bonjour Thomas.
S'agit-il de travaux pour modifier la piste cyclable, rendue inutilisable mais pas vraiment supprimée ?  Dans ce cas je te propose d'appliquer le préfixe disused: afin d'en garder trace : disused:cycleway:left=track.
C'est un peu lourd, mais permet de garder une trace. C'est également une demande des agences d'urbanisme de Paris et d'Île-de-France.
Antoien de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Truchin (2018-12-06 21:27:20+00:00): Bonsoir Antoine
Ce sont des travaux de suppression de la piste qui n'existe donc plus (qui sera récrée de l'autre côté de la chaussée). Pour l'APUR, faut leur expliquer comment utiliser overpass-turbo qui gère très bien l'historique des données
freebeer (2019-01-22 10:21:19+00:00): just as an example,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/649112270
this is absolutely *not* the way to map missing buildings, and as is clear from the imagery, has *no* relation whatsoever to any sort of reality.

adding this sort of garbage to the map does no favours to anyone and if the entire changeset is as foreign to reality as the random example, where a single building spans the length of a street, then i suggest this changeset be reverted so that another mapper can attempt to map reality without being burdened by this fiction.

please stick to mapping real buildings and don't invent this sort of fiction.
stadiaarcadia (2019-01-22 12:29:22+00:00): Please take a look at pictures of this area of Mexico City. You’ll see that the houses / apartments are built against each other. Like row houses, it can be seen as one building, there is no space between the buildings. In the UK, row houses are also mostly drawn as one long building on OSM, because there is no space between the houses.
stadiaarcadia (2019-01-22 12:36:43+00:00): By the way, I will stop with editing on OSM.
letihu (2018-12-03 11:48:42+00:00): Was soll dies
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/649114906/history
denn darstellen?
frosm (2024-09-22 08:40:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9048921
il y a un problème car le from vers le to ne tourne pas à droite
user_8655426 (2018-11-27 10:56:48+00:00): 架空の国道を追加されたようですが、編集ミスでしょうか？ ご確認をお願いいたします。
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/649122490
最近編集された弁天島周辺でも、存在しない道路の追加や、2本の道路が完全に重複した場所がいくつか見つかっています。誤りや雑な編集が非常に多く、県内の編集者の間で問題になっています。Wikiをよく読んでタグを付ける、航空画像で判別できないものはマッピングしない、スピードよりも品質を重視するなど、編集方法を見直されたほうがいいと思います。
user_3688357 (2018-12-01 00:15:59+00:00): ご指摘の件、意図的な編集ではありません。再修正をお願いいたします。
user_8655426 (2018-12-01 00:20:30+00:00): 自分で修正してください。
Gwenj (2018-12-27 14:41:08+00:00): Bonjour David,
Je vois que vous avez modifié le nom de beaucoup de chemins ruraux aux alentours de Brécey, balise name.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386620874
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386687315
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386687316
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/386687317

J’avais volontairement mis le nom du cadastre dans name en plus d’un nom raccourci, qui correspond aux vôtres, dans short_name.
C’est dommage car c’est beaucoup de boulot pour lire le cadastre en ligne souvent coupé dans JOSM, tout ça pour arriver avec des doublons et une perte d’info.
Gwenj
josmougn (2018-12-27 15:11:38+00:00): C'est vraiment une richesse d'ajouter le nom complet du cadastre et c'est aussi un sacré boulot qu'il est dommage de gommer d'un simple clic. Il y a suffisamment de déclinaisons de la clé name pour se permettre cette richesse.