piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2021-10-27 14:54:19+00:00): Здравствуйте, 1Анастасия. Этот пакет правок добавляет лавочки прямо на пешеходную дорожку. Это не правильно. Люди ведь не перепрыгивают через лавочки, когда идут по пешеходной дорожке. Ну и само обозначение лавочки как объекта с тегом "name=Лавочка" не имеет смысла, так как такое обозначение поймут только люди, знающие русский язык. OpenStreetMap - это международный проект, в котором далеко не все знакомы с русским языком, и в котором лавочки обозначают тегом amenity=bench (без названия, так как в действительности у каждой лавочки нет своего названия).  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dbench  
  
Было бы очень хорошо, если бы вы обозначили лавочки в тех местах, в которых они действительно находятся (слева или справа от пешеходной дорожки).
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-26 11:42:11+00:00): see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112158087
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Emilius123 (2024-08-17 14:25:35+00:00): OG Changeset
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Jano John Akim Franke (2022-11-13 11:07:41+00:00): This changeset deleted "DW Kattegat South" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775428556/history which is still in force
Where in the source does it tell otherwise?
AlexZam (2022-11-15 11:18:54+00:00): It is the item 4655 starting on the page 22. It contains a lot of subitems, the list ends on the page 24 and I cannot tell now which one is about "DW Kattegat South". The section for removal is marked with the word "Упразднить" and fairway is most likely "рекомендованный путь". But anyway please restore it if you know that it is still exists.
osmviborg (2022-11-15 13:10:56+00:00): https://dma.dk/safety-at-sea/navigational-information/new-shipping-routes-in-kattegat-and-skagerrak/dw-routes-between-laesoe-og-anholt-and-east-of-grenaa-
Sheila Job (2021-10-29 12:59:07+00:00): The same issue please see the link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&#map=21/-3.39181/36.67359...
thanks for mapping, please continue
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112991552
Luzandro (2024-09-04 10:37:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4419136
DressyPear4 (2021-10-26 13:27:58+00:00): Não crie edições fictíceas
Dave Venables (2021-10-26 15:28:32+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap

Just checking whether the bus stop name is Birchover Way or Amber Road as there is a Birchover Way bus stop further along https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7779287510

The name required is that on the bus stop sign 

Would be worthwhile double checking the names as there should only be one of each name on each side of the road.

Thanks
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Heinz_V (2022-01-09 21:56:17+00:00): You made correction to NH727A: 
each NH is part of a relation; you should update these relations.
VLD211 (2022-01-11 14:24:38+00:00): Hi Heinz_V, I added the relations back and the ref-tag as well
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Shaun das Schaf (2021-10-26 20:43:23+00:00): Hallo beCyko,

du hast recht, da hatte noch das "through" gefehlt.
Auch bei solchen kurzen Straßenstücken dürfen die Lanes gerne korrekt gemappt sein.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Lee Carré (2021-11-01 18:04:47+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/2616804
Lee Carré (2021-10-26 13:08:07+00:00): +source: http://www.osm.org/note/2616828
Cascafico (2021-10-27 08:30:21+00:00): Recently I did many edits in Galapagos, but cannot figure out why all islands are grouped in a multipolygon in which each island is an outer; doing so, cannot map specific landcover (heath, bare rock or whatever).
Please if some expert would remove such multipoly, so we can go on.
eggie (2021-10-26 15:09:28+00:00): Feedback

Marcel..  Je kunt nog aangeven of het apparaat 'inside of ouside' is bevestigd.
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator

De node heb ik vastgemaakt aan het gebouw. Niet naar de dakranden kijken. Die kloppen niet bij schuingenomen luchtfoto's.

MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Lee Carré (2021-10-26 13:23:29+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/2616842
WalkerB (2021-10-26 16:29:49+00:00): Hi!  Your edits look great!  Thank you for putting in so much work on Afghanistan.  I see you use ID editor a lot, have you ever looked at using RapID to quickly add even more roads?  If you're interested check out mapwith.ai it's Facebook's computer vision extraction efforts.  Happy Mapping!
vanagaudi (2021-10-28 09:09:10+00:00): Hello, thanks for your comment and your hint for RapID. I checked out and found that the FB-AI ist not very useful for my way of mapping. I'm exploring aerial images to find at least something about the way people living over there in that country. This way I'm mapping also other tiny details beside those dust roads. Thanks again and Happy Mapping as well!
Dawid2849 (2021-10-26 16:16:56+00:00): Thank you for fixing my typo! :)
Lee Carré (2021-10-26 13:35:02+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/2616839
SekeRob (2021-10-26 13:53:23+00:00): Thank you for contributing and tell every other mapper between San Francisco and Calcutta. They appreciate everyone keeps their edit sets local. Makes review lots easier by others... trust is good, blue eyes or not, verification is better.

cheers from Italy.
MxxCon (2021-10-26 19:32:05+00:00): Hello.
Please do not make changes "globally". It is much better to split up your edits into smaller geographic areas, be it neighborhood, city or region. That makes it much easier to ensure that changes you make are valid and accurate.
maraf24 (2021-11-22 09:51:43+00:00): Na pewno private?
Tutaj od lat były otwarte furtki i każdy mógł wejść na podwórko (ale nie wjechać samochodem).
Mordechai23 (2021-11-22 13:08:14+00:00): jak edytowałem to założyłem że 
1.  pewnie zamykają furtki na noc
2.  przez te otwarte furtki i tak nie da się zrobić żadnego skrótu właśnie przez zamkniętą bramę przy hotelu przy Gwarnej
maraf24 (2021-11-23 09:27:31+00:00): A to muszę sprawdzić, bo jak ostatnio tam byłem (w tym roku), to właśnie przy hotelu wchodziłem.
Furtki/bramy zamykane na noc taguję tak: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3866953354 (nie do końca sprawdza to się zimą ;)
maraf24 (2021-11-23 14:36:30+00:00): Byłem dziś, wspólnota wymieniła płot, teraz jest porządny, nie taki jak na GSV :P 
Nie ma już furtek prowadzących wprost do klatek.
Od Dworcowej są tylko dwie skrajne, północna otwarta, południowa na klucz.
Furtka od strony hotelu otwarta, tak jak ostatnio.
Czy tak jest na stałe oczywiście (jeszcze) nie wiem.
toeklk (2023-12-29 23:50:39+00:00): Hi, in this changeset, you set way #932798599 to private, but the bicycle=yes tag is still there (meaning that bicycles are allowed to pass but pedestrians not for instance).  Was this intended?  TIA!
Sandal man (2021-11-18 23:38:21+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits, but you are drawing two ways on top of each other, that is not possible, can you repair it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996638181#map=19/36.51084/-4.65816
Sandal man (2021-11-25 12:12:33+00:00): Solved myself, while there comes no reaction.
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:19:21+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112995770
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:19:38+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112995857
Erick tamba (2021-11-05 06:05:40+00:00): Added buildings
skyper (2022-03-03 16:56:22+00:00): Hallo Eichner@KVV
Die Gelöschten und durch Neue  ersetzten Wege hätten ja schon aus dem Grab geholt werden können, z.B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/620700144

Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112981367

So geht halt doch einiges an Information der Objektgeschichte verloren, schade. Beim nächsten mal vielleicht besser doch die Hilfe erfahrener Personen annehmen.

Grüße skyper
eggie (2021-10-26 15:02:20+00:00): Hier is de enige fout dat de oversteek met de hoofdrijbaan Haarlemmertrekvaart geen verbindingsnode heeft.
Zie foutmelding
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-26 15:16:49+00:00): De verbindingsnode heb ik even gemaakt.
Ook al mag je daar niet afslaan.. altijd een verbindingsnode maken. Denk ook bv aan hulpdiensten die wel het fietspad moeten nemen. 
eggie
eggie (2021-10-26 15:04:05+00:00): feedback Wat er niet is kan weg.
Wat nog niet klopt is dat het fietspad de N444 kruist zonder verbindingsnode.
gr eggie
Lee Carré (2021-11-01 19:31:06+00:00): http://www.gov.je/News/2021/Pages/GovernmentOfficeDevelopment.aspx
Erick tamba (2021-11-05 06:05:23+00:00): Added buildings
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:19:47+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112996711
SHARCRASH (2021-10-28 17:00:00+00:00): Hi! You could have kept landuse=commercial since the final aim of the institute is to commercialise its researches.
danwax (2021-10-28 20:27:04+00:00): Hello, I have no objection against adding it again, and I have noticed that you already did so. All good for me!
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:19:55+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112996801
vorpalblade (2021-11-29 23:29:45+00:00): Just an FYI, I *have* georeferenced all the available imagery using the imagery offset database.

Unfortunately, the editor you are using doesn't pull from that database, and JOSM requires a plugin for that.

Anyway, just so you know, Mesa County GIS has allowed us to use their (much more) up to date imagery for tracing in OpenStreetMap. You can see it by clicking on the "Background Settings" button in iD (keyboard shortcut "b") and select "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018".

JOSM also has access to the 2019 (County wide) and 2020 (Grand Valley) aerial photos with the names starting as "Mesa County GIS".

Thanks for your contributions,
vorpalblade
vorpalblade (2021-11-29 23:35:41+00:00): Addendum:
I'm not certain how the turn restrictions at https://osm.org/node/176212265 are valid (from a legal perspective). I'm not seeing anything in the 2020 aerial imagery that would indicate that vision is obstructed.

Anyway, something else that you can add to discourage routing would be stop signs. Assuming they exist on the ground.

I'll try to remember to do a drive-by to get Mapillary imagery for that intersection some time.
Vinber-Pro (2021-11-03 10:43:41+00:00): Bonjour,

on parle de celui ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9013274617

Bonne journée
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112996951
OTPBIJAUREGUIBERRY (2021-11-09 10:00:03+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est celui le lieu actuel de ce laboratoire.

Bonne journée.
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:20:05+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112997009
aixbrick (2021-10-27 06:58:31+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,

dieser Weg wurde doch offenbar bewusst zu dem Aussichtspunkt angelegt, zumindest deuten die Luftbilder und https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.825169654444&lng=6.1116763483333&z=17&pKey=847856665828639&focus=photo (links zweigt der Weg ab) darauf hin. Warum ist dieser Weg nun "illegal"?

Wofür steht denn der Username "UNB-SRAC-LQ"? UNB = Untere Naturschutzbehörde? Falls ja, ist das ein offizieller Account? Dann muss im Profil darauf hingewiesen werden und es sind die https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Organised_Editing_Guidelines zu berücksichtigen.

Gruß
aixbrick (2021-10-27 11:41:04+00:00): Wurde per PN geklärt.
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:20:40+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112997194
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:20:53+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112997280
eginhard (2021-10-26 19:06:12+00:00): Could you add proper changeset comments please? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
BBMaper (2021-11-15 07:49:50+00:00): Hello, it was street and building geometry correction according to swisstopo images
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Sheila Job (2021-10-29 12:53:47+00:00): Here, got the same problem, please in the link:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&#map=21/-3.39298/36.67495
and have some buildings that are not retctangular you can see in the link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&#map=21/-3.39316/36.67641.

Thanks please keep going
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112997521
SomeoneElse (2021-10-27 10:37:29+00:00): Hello DaveF,
This appears to be an automated edit to change tags from one tagging scheme to another.  Can you please explain where you followed https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct , including discussing it with the local community first?  In the case of GB edits, I'd suggest that talk-gb was the best place for that.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
DaveF (2021-10-27 12:03:34+00:00): Hi
As I've used at least three pieces of 'official' software in series, knowingly & intentionally restricted the search area to England, Wales & Scotland, knowingly & intentionally restricted the search criteria to three tag keys, & further restricted the value tag of one of those keys to four values, please explain how this is an automatic edit.

Please clarify what theses "one scheme" & "other scheme" are? You're not clear.

In what way are you claiming this edit reduces the quality of the OSM database?

If you so wish, please feel free to start a topic on any forum that keeps a record of posts & is accessible to all. Please inform if you do so.
DaveF (2021-10-27 12:13:45+00:00): From:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

"Recommended to also tag with surface=sand"

"Do not use the tag landuse=grass in order to make the rendering more appealing. Use surface=grass"
DaveF (2021-10-27 14:27:30+00:00): Please explain how my voluntary contributions to improving the OSM database have been performed "without consideration of each change."?
DaveF (2021-10-28 00:48:50+00:00): The changeset comment clearly states the reason for my contributions in improving the quality of the OSM database. Why did you not read that?
SomeoneElse (2021-10-30 08:37:46+00:00): (with regard to the "tagging" comments above)

> Please clarify what theses "one scheme" & "other scheme" are? 

By that I simply meant "what you're changing from" and "what you're changing to".

> In what way are you claiming this edit reduces the quality of the OSM database?

I've not made any suggestion that your series of changes here makes OSM "better" or "worse", although some of the complaints that the DWG have received, and some of the comments at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=115894 , clearly think that it is making it worse.

>  please feel free to start a topic on any forum that keeps a record of posts & is accessible to all

I think that that is the best way forward (I've already suggested it in response to a couple of recent complaints the DWG has had about these edits).
Best Regards,
Andy (from the Data Working Group)
SomeoneElse (2021-10-30 09:24:16+00:00): (in addition)

> Why did you not read that?

For the avoidance of doubt, I have read that - in fact I remember the tagging and rendering discussions prior to the "surface=sand" change, numerous other "should the wiki lead tagging or merely reflect it" discussions, and the discussions about how editors such as iD show what tags are in use, and the specific iD issue that you opened https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748 , with all the comments there, (and numerous other similar ones around "should iD lead tagging common practice or follow it").  To summarise, I have read it.

More generally, making comments like this (and numerous others visible at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=115894 and elsewhere) is completely out of order.

Please read https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Etiquette (and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Etiquette#History_of_the_Etiquette_Page ).  It's been OSMF policy since 2011.  

Your comments here and elsewhere fall quite a way short of what is expected of all of us in things like "Assume good faith".  This has a couple of effects - one is that people won't want to ask your opinion or advice, or discuss things with you, because (to quote one person) any discussion was "probably going to be a waste of my time" because you are (to quote another) "gratuitously rude".  The other effect is that people will be reluctant to support you even when you're correct in your analysis of how things are normally done in OSM.

Please do try and remember that the people that you're discussing things with are actually people, and that their goal (improving OSM) is the same as yours.  It's in everyone's interest, including yours, to discuss things calmly and to listen to other people's point of view especially when, as here, both views have some validity.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
Jakka (2021-10-27 07:55:45+00:00): Add house number and street would complete your location better Thx
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:21:08+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112997730
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:21:15+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112997838
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
mueschel (2021-10-27 17:53:29+00:00): Hi,
please check the nodes you added here - many got just a name tag, but no actual tag describing what they are.
Mashin (2021-10-26 20:06:10+00:00): Hi,
thanks for your edits. I am just bringing to attention that trail blazes and descriptive names don't belong to name= tag.

If you want to add a hiking trial you can do that by creating a relation e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12180957

You can check which trails are already mapped in https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=16!41.8679!-72.985 or https://en.mapy.cz/turisticka?x=-72.9863089&y=41.8712555&z=15
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:47:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
gscholz (2021-10-31 08:52:27+00:00): Hi Carlos,
your recent edits have created  some broken boundary relations in the OSM database:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-55.23357&lat=-27.04058&zoom=14

Can you please fix ths?
Kind regards
Guido
Carlos Brys (2021-11-01 11:50:34+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. 
It's already fixed
wireguy (2021-10-26 16:54:38+00:00): Hi peace2, fyi, 
this change broke the  wood relation.  there is a small gap missing where the wood meets the top of the reservoir.  I didn't want to touch it if you are still working in the area.
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:21:30+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112998326
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:21:39+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112998382
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:21:45+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112998500
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
skquinn (2021-10-27 05:06:32+00:00): This looks like a lot more than just adding a service road. Looks like you left the changeset open by mistake?
luin132 (2021-10-27 15:51:42+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out. I had a setting incorrect in JOSM.
mariotomo (2021-10-27 20:55:22+00:00): a better description, at least as far as the edits in Peru are concerned, might be "adding/refining roads, reclassifying, adding several access gates and specifying their access property for the road behind them". it feels weird to me that the gate should have access=permissive and the road access=private.
luin132 (2021-10-27 21:06:18+00:00): I made each change as a separate changeset when I edited each feature. The problem is I use Java Open Street Map to edit and I had a setting incorrect that uploaded all my changes as one open changeset. I have now corrected that setting so all my changes will upload as separate changesets.
Viki_travel_weak (2021-10-28 11:21:52+00:00): #mbx_linters_canada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112998650