piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Ze0zohk1 (2021-03-09 18:04:44+00:00): Hallo tobi4473,

in diesem CS hat du eine Berghütte hinzugefügt. a) passt das nicht wirklich zu dem Changesetkommentar und b) scheint mir das nicht plausibel, dass dort eine Berghütte ist (also tourism=alpine_hut). In Bing sehe ist an der Stelle nichts. Kannst du hier Klarheit schaffen? War das vielleicht einfach ein Versehen? 

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
tobi4473 (2021-03-10 12:09:44+00:00): Hallo Ze0zohk1,

danke für den Hinweis. Das war wirklich nur ein Versehen. Ich weiß nicht wie das da reingeraten ist. Es ist wieder gelöscht. 

Grüße 
tobi4473
santamariense (2021-02-22 21:14:33+00:00): rkdaudt,

A rede troncal foi aprovada pela comunidade estadual e de uma certa forma está consolidada. Esta rodovia (ERS-240) é troncal (highway=trunk) porque é rota principal a interligar cidades com mais de 200 mil habitantes, como Santa Maria e Novo Hamburgo.

Esta edição precisa ser revertida porque não está de acordo com o que foi aprovado.

Participe do grupo estadual para tirar dúvidas: https://t.me/osmrs

Guia de mapeamento de classificação rodoviária: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil

santamariense
Nonexhudlix (2021-08-08 06:30:40+00:00): "leerstehend" ist nun definitiv *kein* Name.

Sehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-24 14:09:33+00:00): I would recommend mapping orchards including palm tree orchards with areas like for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/910494421

re https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8447007548

gnis:feature_id=Palm Tree is completely wrong

natural=wood is wrong, natural=tree is at least not incorrect
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-24 14:10:00+00:00): Oh, and name=Palm Tree is also wrong
Vinber-Pro (2022-11-12 10:59:25+00:00): Bonjour,
où en êtes vous de tout ceci, car actuellement ce node avec simplement une description n'a pas beaucoup de sens.

Dans quel cadre faites vous cela ?

Et vous aviez aussi ouvert quelques notes, savez vous quels sont les matériaux traités dans ces PAV ?

Bonne journée
tonyf1 (2021-10-30 06:04:59+00:00): see Changeset #113148761
user_5359 (2021-04-05 07:27:53+00:00): Hello! You add a relation without any member and a very short key sp. What ist the meaning of this relation (there also six others)?
GinaroZ (2021-02-24 00:28:23+00:00): Perhaps https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dridge or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Darete might be worth using?
mapbear66 (2021-02-24 11:37:53+00:00): Absolutely. I saw someone has put in tower ridge (one of the classic climbs on the north face) and it'd be good to put in more. Certainly the Carn Mor Dearg arete should be marked as such, so I can see I have plenty of work to do here!
ALu68 (2021-02-23 21:30:18+00:00): Hello KVA1440, if you want to contribute to OSM read the wiki first.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Caracter%C3%ADsticas_del_mapa

I reversed your changeset .
flohoff (2021-02-25 16:25:44+00:00): Moin,
guck dir das hier nochmal an - lanes:forward=1 aber in den turn:lanes 2 einträge - Das passt so nicht.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24784376
user_1566574 (2021-04-18 19:08:01+00:00): Salut !
Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35400706, s'agissant d'un chemin fléché, il est recommandé (Wiki) d'utiliser highway=path.

Je corrigerais, mais merci ! 😉
tanonin (2021-04-18 19:39:01+00:00): Comment ça chemin fléché? Path ou track designe la taille du chemin
user_1566574 (2021-04-18 21:08:19+00:00): J'ai vérifié, j'ai tort. Sans doute une erreur de lecture, de compréhension ou autre...

Je retire ce que j'ai dit, et donc merci de la correction ! 😋
ftrebien (2021-02-23 03:56:50+00:00): É troncal sim. Rota principal entre São Leopoldo e Santa Maria. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/RS/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_RS
tux67 (2021-02-23 08:38:47+00:00): Hi, ich hab' mal die Address Reste am Gebäude removed. Der Eingang ist jetzt etwas verwirrend (wofür ist der - ich neme an Polizei) - der Rest ist dann vom Parkplatz erreichbar?

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99774029
jande75 (2021-02-23 09:10:43+00:00): Hi, ja, genau, der eingezeichnete Eingang ist der der Polizei. Die Eingänge zu den Geschäften sind vom Parkplatz aus. Werd ich das nächste mal einzeichnen, wenn ich vor Ort bin.
tux67 (2021-02-23 09:39:42+00:00): bzgl. der Adressreste - es waren noch City und Country am Gebäude.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99774029
maraf24 (2021-02-22 22:11:41+00:00): Drogę odtworzyłem. Proszę nie kasować dojazdów do domów. Dane OSM wykorzystują m.in. strażacy i oni takie informacje wykorzystują.
pitfire (2021-06-14 11:30:07+00:00): Hallo Reimund-1
beim Namen bitte keine Gesellschaftform mit reinschreiben sondern nur den eigentlichen Namen. Gesellschaftformen können unter operator=* geschrieben werden.
Aleks-Berlin (2021-02-24 10:33:27+00:00): Hi Federico Explorador,
you put a problematic tag "+++" = ESRI (3x). Do you mean "source" = "ESRI ??
Thx, Alex
Nmxosm (2021-02-23 18:18:19+00:00): Hallo corrector_91,

vielen Dank für deine Änderungen.

Du hast hier in https://osm.org/way/909783162 einen Park angelegt. 
Sowohl das deutsche als auch das englische Wiki sagen allerdings (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpark), dass ein solcher üblicherweise für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich ist - dies ist hier nicht der Fall. 
Auch das andere definierende Kriterium "Grünfläche, die zur Erholung dient" ist hier meiner Meinung nach nicht erfüllt - vielmehr handelt es sich meiner Meinung nach hierbei um einen privaten Garten, den ich überhaupt nicht kartieren würde. 

Meiner Meinung nach sollte dieser Park wieder entfernt werden. Wie ist deine Meinung dazu?

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
corrector_91 (2021-02-24 00:36:15+00:00): Hallo,

Ja, du bist richtig. Das Gebiet ist nicht für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich. Vielleicht garten ist besser als park hier. Oder landuse=grass

Viele Grüße,
corrector_91
Nmxosm (2021-02-25 10:17:08+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.

Viele Grüße
Nmxosm
❤️‍🔥 (2021-02-23 10:26:21+00:00): looks good, I've also updated the type of landuse  from construction to university
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99776155
iandees (2021-02-22 23:15:38+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. It doesn't look like there's actually a pond there, so I went ahead and removed this. Please only add stuff to the map that exists in the real world.
Anton Khorev (2021-02-26 08:13:04+00:00): Здравствуйте.

Если этот объект в реальности снова будет ликвидирован, то, учитывая вероятность его восстановления, вы могли бы вместо удаления точки поставить в её теги подходящий префикс, например "was:"?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%81%D1%8B_%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0

Так было бы легче следить за историей изменения элемента. Сейчас её часть находится на предыдущей точке, которая не была восстановлена, и вместо которой была создана текущая.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3452871735/history

История редактирования помогает понять в том числе и вашу точку зрения на счёт того, как данный объект следует обозначать.

С уважением,  
Антон Хорев  
Рабочая группа по данным
Fod (2022-05-06 14:30:22+00:00): Hej Niels.

Hvorfor har du slettet Stationskvarteret i Hedehusene/Nærheden?

Venligst,
Jakob
flohoff (2021-02-25 16:23:42+00:00): Moin,
das tagging verstehe ich nicht:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242741412

Wenn da ein Zeichen 250 steht dann scheint das so breit zu sein das grundsätzlich ein Fahrzeug drauf passt. Warum dann path?

Und ein path mit access=permissive? Wie ist das denn sonst beschildert?

Flo
Mar Mar (2021-02-22 23:28:53+00:00): Hi ABDURAHMAN AL FURJANI. I think it is great you are putting all individual trees on the map, this is a lot of work! But I'd like to kindly point out that according to the wiki the "name:" field is not to be used for the description of the species but only in rare cases the tree is very special and has received specific name as "individual". As you can see the wiki leaves no room for interpretations: "This tag must not be used for a description of the species." It is very useful to have the species but this should go in the "species:" tag. For further clarification I recommend reading the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree

In any case: Thanks for your contribution! Kind regards, Marcos (Mar Mar)
Kovoschiz (2021-02-24 16:18:51+00:00): `species=` is not strictly appropriate. There's a `tree=palm` for general use (previously `type=palm` had been used without regards), following `trees=` suggested in `landuse=orchard`. Technically, if `family=Arecaceae ` looks too ambiguous and weak, `taxon=Arecaceae` (and possibly `taxon:family=Arecaceae `) could be used.
user_8094921 (2021-02-24 17:39:00+00:00): Dear Kovoschiz and Marcos
thank you for your advice.
ok, I will map rees as areas.
regards
Note_Fixer (2021-02-22 23:22:33+00:00): Note 2374236
Note 2374239
Note_Fixer (2021-02-22 23:25:54+00:00): Note 1672543
Note_Fixer (2021-02-22 23:30:19+00:00): Note 695957
Note_Fixer (2021-02-22 23:33:49+00:00): Note 695958
Sandal man (2021-08-09 15:51:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845206828
Hola, gracias por los ajustes al osm, pero parece que estás tratando de dibujar un "footway" como área.
Sin embargo, un "footway" tiene solo 1 línea.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dfootway

Un área debe considerarse peatonal
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian

Pero tenga cuidado de no dibujar áreas / líneas duplicadas.

Saludos Jan
(Traductor de google)
Dodko (2021-04-26 10:54:30+00:00): Jarná ulica je o 100 metrov juhovýchodne.
marc__marc (2022-09-29 06:58:16+00:00): Hello,
a bank or a bench ?
Regards,
Marc
johnarupire (2022-09-30 01:32:40+00:00): Hello Marc, is a bench, yes.
tux67 (2021-02-23 08:50:26+00:00): Der Turm als place of worship? ich denke die ganze Kirche ist das? Entweder Relation oder als Building Part?
Das englische Wiki scheint mit da korrekter (ohne amenity=xx am Turm). Ich hab' mir mal erlaubt das mit einem Vorschlag upzudaten.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99778457
jande75 (2021-02-23 08:54:36+00:00): Laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=place_of_worship#Kirchturm soll ein Turm explizit als place of worship angegeben werden. Viele Grüße, jande75
tux67 (2021-02-23 09:56:46+00:00): Hi,
ja .. hatte ich gesehen im Wiki. Da das m.E. nicht der richtige Ansatz ist (eine Kirche ist eine Kirche) und wiederspricht der Maxime:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Ein_Objekt_in_der_Realit.C3.A4t_entspricht_genau_einem_Objekt_in_OSM
Im Zweifel ist das englische Wiki maßgebend, wenn das nicht ein nur lokal in DE auftretenes Thema beinhaltet.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99778457
ALu68 (2021-02-23 21:46:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM, please use common keys only, which you can find at the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:amenity%3Dcar_wash
Note_Fixer (2021-02-23 00:21:23+00:00): Note 2448456
Note_Fixer (2021-02-23 00:29:33+00:00): Note 2205593
Note_Fixer (2021-02-23 00:36:30+00:00): Note 2375690
Note_Fixer (2021-02-23 00:42:30+00:00): Note 1424653
flohoff (2021-02-23 08:09:20+00:00): Moin,
ich hab deine änderung hier gesehen. landuse=terrace ist definitiv ein falsches Tag für eine Terasse. 

landuse sind landnutzungstags so wie "Industriegebiet" oder "Wohnbebauung" und nicht für kleinteiliges mappen zu nutzen. 

Ich weiss nicht ob es für Terassen ein richtiges tag gibt. Da müsstest du mal das osm wiki befragen. 

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99779248
Kovoschiz (2021-02-23 04:10:47+00:00): Is there any good reason why you want do this? Any prior discussions on a worldwide attempt?
Kovoschiz (2021-02-23 05:32:20+00:00): Ok I found it now. Please provide info in your changeset, and mention to the local community next time. There are some that should be `water=stream` (?), and some unclosed linear `waterway=`, among other issues.
sandeman_13 (2021-02-23 01:06:11+00:00): Entrance, footway, and name edits based on local knowledge.
FennecusZerda (2021-08-04 12:14:35+00:00): Thanks for the contribution. Please use the description tag for long text, and make the name short. If name is not known leave it empty for other mappers to fill in. A fixme request can also be added - See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme. Regards, Trond
Note_Fixer (2021-02-23 01:09:15+00:00): Note 2103422
Note_Fixer (2021-02-23 01:22:38+00:00): Note 1758002
PT-53 (2021-03-01 07:18:07+00:00): Hallo  ChrisFromRV,
im OSM-Inspector wird für diesen Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4493315136/history
ein Hinweis "nonop_confusion_on_nodes" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.60547&lat=47.77950&zoom=18&opacity=0.48&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways

Statt
construction=yes
solltest Du besser
construction:shop=supermarket
oder
disused:shop=supermarket
verwenden.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction?uselang=de
Grüße
ChrisFromRV (2021-03-01 14:21:17+00:00): Ich habe es korrigiert (hoffentlich richtig).
PT-53 (2021-03-01 14:58:18+00:00): Leider nicht richtig.
Du hast als Key / Schlüssel 
construction:shop=supermarket
und als Value / Wert
yes
eingetragen.
Richtig wäre für Key / Schlüssel:
construction:shop
und für Value / Wert:
supermarket
jodd (2022-11-09 20:52:43+00:00): Hello, the name of the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7466630 sounds a bit strange in my opinion. Should we move it into the description key? Or is it really the building's name?
jodd (2022-11-09 20:53:19+00:00): Sorry, I mean the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74666303
corrector_91 (2022-11-09 23:36:59+00:00): Hello,
Yeah, it is a historical monument and this is the name they use to refer to it in the historic monument list. (I just added the historic building tag to it).
Note_Fixer (2021-02-23 01:47:17+00:00): Note 2183794
public street
Diana IRM-ED (2021-06-29 04:55:18+00:00): Hi Federico Explorador, is it okay to leave the road node shared with the waterbody node?
Supaplex (2021-04-17 08:39:10+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DaveF (2021-02-24 15:51:01+00:00): Hi
Radway=station nodes shouldn't have stop_position tags
Allison P (2022-07-04 06:40:26+00:00): I would think the buildings named with only a four digit number are just the housenumber.
JessAk71 (2022-07-04 14:54:26+00:00): thats a good question, the studio map didnt make it clear either way only the label on the building was the number. I know other studio lots tend to just name buildings like: "Building 1230" etc but unclear how they are doing it here. The numbers are all unique and dont repeat which makes me assume its a building number instead of an address based on a street but certainly it could what you suggest as well. Feel free to make updates if you think its an addr number.
Irma IRM-ED (2021-07-23 05:45:35+00:00): Hi sujatha_1 ,
Believe what you are doing is right. However, digitize your path https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/909824756 crossing the waterway.
What do you think?

Thank you and happy mapping :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
Aglis IRM-ED (2021-03-24 00:22:52+00:00): Hi vin_28. I changed the classification of this way (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/909835516) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. I also made some change around this changeset. Thank you.
Aslam Baig 958 (2021-02-23 13:42:49+00:00): Very Nice Place To Visit With Good Taste Nad Humble Staff ❤
user_5359 (2021-02-23 05:50:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
Kseniya_Nekrasava (2021-03-01 10:12:59+00:00): Hi! Sorry, but you added a lot of drag nodes to the map with your changes. Be more careful in next time!)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99789356
ZeLonewolf (2021-03-01 11:26:18+00:00): Thanks for catching this!  There's a lag issue in JOSM that caused this problem :(
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-04-30 04:58:14+00:00): I just modified the water body based on Maxar Premium Imagery
AuenseeLake (2021-04-30 21:47:18+00:00): Thanks for letting me know, happy mapping!
abakus_uploader (2021-02-23 23:31:20+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
MacLondon (2021-02-24 02:25:59+00:00): Hi. This changeset changed an accurately mapped short section of single carriageway into a 'physically separated dual carriageway' as a supposedly "necessary" change. In addition this messed up several bus route relations.
Bolt006 (2021-02-24 12:35:39+00:00): 
Hello MacLondon,

Thank you for letting me know. I have restored the relations and will be more vigilant going forward.
rskedgell (2021-02-23 12:10:09+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for updating the map.

If you alter the geometry of a junction more complex than a simple intersection between two ways, please check for and update any route relations which traverse the junction.

I have fixed the bus and cycle routes following this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99824533
Bolt011 (2021-02-23 14:45:15+00:00): Hi rskedgell,

Thank you for restoring the relations. I will be more vigilant going forward.
rskedgell (2021-02-23 18:47:36+00:00): Thanks - and thanks again for the work you and your team are doing on junctions.
user_5359 (2021-02-23 07:11:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the https://www.osmp.org/relation/3361059? Your entry is a duplicate. I merge your information together.
Irma IRM-ED (2021-04-16 07:17:47+00:00): Hy, bolle_pally.
Thanks for your mapping. I have changed a road classification https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/909882179.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
ZldYe (2021-02-23 09:40:37+00:00): Bedankt!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
user_5239402 (2021-02-23 07:05:37+00:00): 안녕하세요 
바뀜집합 댓글을 구체적으로 적으세요
user_5239402 (2021-02-23 07:05:58+00:00): ㅈㄴㅇ 같은 문구는 도움이 되지 않습니다.
흑마늘 (2021-09-12 08:43:51+00:00): 죄송합니다. 현재 편집하는건 전부 내용작성하여 작성중입니다. 앞으로 조심하겠습니다.
abakus_uploader (2021-02-23 23:31:19+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Allison P (2021-02-23 15:11:24+00:00): The driveway you deleted was already marked as private. This isn't a matter of authorization. These features were deleted previously by Map_Manager, which makes me suspect that you are the same person, especially as this is your first changeset. I have reverted your deletions.
Privacy1 (2021-02-23 19:32:55+00:00): Property owner advises that property in question is private. Property owner does not request, authorize, or approve notes made on or about owner's property which are made by non-government persons or groups.
**
Le propriétaire de propriété avise que la propriété en question est privée. Le propriétaire de propriété ne demande pas, autorise, ou approuve des notes faites sur ou de la propriété de propriétaire qui sont faits par les personnes non-gouvernementales ou les groupes.
clay_c (2021-02-23 21:23:19+00:00): It doesn't matter whether you authorize it or not. That has no bearing on whether other people may add a driveway and buildings to OpenStreetMap. 

If you don't want these structures mapped, you are free to demolish them.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-25 23:11:59+00:00): The mappers does does not require requests, authorizations, or approval notes to map buildings, addresses, roads, landuse, shops, waterways, coastline, glaciers etc.
Bert Araali (2021-02-25 23:30:35+00:00): Well noticed Yusuf, the building was mssing.  Thanks for improving Uganda's map !
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:28:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .