piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DaveF (2017-10-12 21:28:58+00:00): Leave it as it was. 
As it didn't have PROW designation tags it was making no claims that it was.'
'Private' indicates it's not publicly accessible.
Nuggg (2017-10-13 11:46:50+00:00): That's at odds with what I read on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access - perhaps permissive is the appropriate choice in this case. I see you have reverted now anyhow so will leave it to you.
DaveF (2017-10-13 19:39:57+00:00): FYI National Trust map (zoom in)
http://tinyurl.com/y8ub78sj
Nuggg (2017-10-13 21:01:10+00:00): OK I concede it is NT land and so can be treated as implicitly public along with its paths. However, the track off Bathwick Hill looked like a private driveway to me, complete with gate.
DaveF (2017-10-13 21:42:58+00:00): True, just like there's a gate to the Western side. Last time I went through the Bathwick Hill gate it was unlocked & no 'private' signs. To the rear of the houses there are clearly defined property wall boundaries: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DMDIioFX0AEBtNW.jpg
Nuggg (2017-10-13 21:48:35+00:00): Rather different looking kinds of gate IMO, with the western one certainly more indicative of public access, but it is all subjective in the absence of signs.
naoliv (2017-10-12 07:00:46+00:00): Arthur, outro detalhe nessas áreas gramadas, como essa por exemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495746151
Ou ela é uma área natural (natural=grassland) ou possui ação do homem (landuse=grass), mas não as duas.
Apensar de ambas tags representarem uma área gramada, precisa entender que existe essa pequena diferença.
GinaroZ (2017-10-11 13:59:06+00:00): Thanks, knew there was issues with the bridge but didn't know that entrance was closed. I can see it now on ESRI imagery.
eggie (2017-10-11 14:07:04+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
Владимир К (2018-04-02 10:45:58+00:00): Зачем вы переделали правильные теги лесных кварталов обратно в неправильные теги леса? Почитайте, пожалуйста, как нужно https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Alekzzander/diary/42476
Jz White (2018-04-06 14:01:25+00:00): Этот вопрос уже обсуждали вот здесь.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=667768#p667768

Касаемо Вашей ссылки - у автора весьма размытое понятие об этом всем.

Мне весьма нравится фраза в статье:

"Однако с места в карьер разобраться с этим не получилось, да и плюс ко всему желаемая информация не отображалась нигде. Совсем. Но мы же не рисуем под рендер, " 

А нахуа мы тогда рисуем? Чтобы было, но использовать на практике нельзя?
Владимир К (2018-04-06 18:11:46+00:00): ну камон, осм же база данных. на практике пользоваться - настраивать свой рендер для своих нужд. В данном случае карту лесных кварталов. никто никогда не заявлял, что на сайте карта лесных кварталов. Из готовых решений есть османд, там настроили отображение этого.
eggie (2017-10-11 14:13:36+00:00): Vaak is het zo dat fieters/brommers uitgezonderd zijn. Dan de tag ebij
oneway:bicycle=no

evt ook 
oneway:moped=no
eggie (2017-10-11 14:10:45+00:00): oneway=no wordt meestal niet op wegen gezet. Wanneer je bang bent dat iemand er weer oneway=yes van maakt kun je ook note=oneway no toevoegen.
user_5359 (2017-10-11 18:36:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your business please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfurniture .
BeKri (2017-10-11 15:46:42+00:00): Ich spendiere noch ein t für den Abholmark
joerg_s (2017-10-12 04:50:30+00:00): Hallo BeKri,
ich hatte eigentlich nur die Hausnummer nachgetragen.
Trotzdem Danke
Gruß
Jörg
BeKri (2017-10-12 14:09:27+00:00): Servus Jörg,
geht mir genau so,
man konzentriert sich auf etwas und stellt später fest,
DAS hättest Du auch noch ändern können ...
Fehlt ja erst seit 4 Jahren, das kleine t ;-)
Servus derBeKri
dieterdreist (2017-12-15 17:32:49+00:00): FL3 Vigna Clara - Ostiense, ma esiste attualmente? Non è disused?
mueschel (2017-10-13 07:33:22+00:00): Hi,
I don't think that the OSM database is the right place to collect information on pot holes, using no established tags to describe them. Please co sider using a dedicates service for this, for example umap.

Jan
tuxayo (2020-10-12 16:43:30+00:00): Chemin du truc? C'est quoi la source?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/133614653
Hjart (2017-10-11 14:47:54+00:00): Du fik ikke ført wikidata + wikipedia tags på Gymnasiet med over?
Bemærk at der er et wikipedia plugin til JOSM
Alexander-II (2017-10-31 23:11:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Какой смысл несет tourism=yes на https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27087228 ?
user_5359 (2017-10-11 18:34:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree.
"Chinese Parasol Tree“ isn’t a name, it is a description of the tree (genius / species)
automaciej (2017-10-17 10:27:02+00:00): Hey! Thanks for adding Parkside!
s3b4s5 (2017-10-13 13:11:32+00:00): Hola Maria Lia. Entiendo que tenés la buena intención de mejorar el mapa, pero esta edición en particular, el conjunto de cambios #52828567, estuvo malo. Eliminaste varios caminos y rutas importantes del mapa, y rompiste el multipolígono de agua del Río Paraná. Seguramente fue un error involuntario, pero te pido que la próxima tengas más cuidado. En el siguiente link podrás observar los cambios, las líneas rojas significan objetos eliminados por tu edición: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52828567

No te preocupes que yo ya me encargué de reestablecer todo como estaba antes. Saludos, Sebastián.
GinaroZ (2017-10-11 15:20:36+00:00): Hi, notice you deleted a number of benches and other objects - did you mean to do this?
Chris Fleming (2017-10-12 12:19:15+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 

In case deleting these was as accident (very easy to do), I've restored there objects. Let me know if this is wrong, and let me know uif you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris
user_5359 (2017-10-11 18:32:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. Did you see the whole cemetery https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7140927? A cemetery inside the cemetery does not make sense.

Please cleanup your test!
olehz (2019-05-23 08:32:38+00:00): от поясни навіщо було засерати Львів "лісами"? точки стоять через кожний метр-два - навіщо обводити ті крони з такою точністю? ти ж розумієш, що все залежить від знімка і пори року? дороги гуляють з похибкою 10-20 метрів до GPS, зате крони обводимо з точністю до метра. коли по факту у дворі стоїть 2 дерева, на ОСМ тепер цілий гай, який складається з 40 точок, які на додачу ще й мають спільні точки з дорогами та іншими обєктами.
VictorIE (2020-10-07 07:01:31+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4463371

What is req=12049 ? I was thinking it was meant to be a logainm ref or something, but not logainm.

https://www.logainm.ie/1374260.aspx
Dafo43 (2020-10-07 08:27:59+00:00): Assuming it was me who added it, then it would have been a mistake. I can't think of anything it would reference.
VictorIE (2020-10-07 09:01:52+00:00): Ooops, yes, someone else had adde it.
eggie (2017-10-11 15:37:15+00:00): Nu heb ik het idee dat hier iets niet goed is gegaan. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52829772
Ik kijk even...
eggie (2017-10-11 15:45:33+00:00): Je hebt de man_made bridge als element aan de veerweg geplakt. Ik draai de changeset terug. Wat was je bedoeling hier?
Je verandert de edit van een andere mapper . Heb je hem geconsulteerd?
Dit is inderdaad een vaag stuk infrastructuur met een brug die meer dan een jaar open heeft gestaan. 
Even niet mappen hier.
eggie (2017-10-11 15:49:44+00:00): reverted 52829772
wegens onbedoelde schade
eggie (2017-10-11 15:55:31+00:00): Wat je voor het fietspad aanzag is de fysieke brug. Die hoort niet aan de Veerweg vast te zitten. De paden zijn door een ervaren lokale mapper Sander H. toegevoegd. Er is hier inderdaad steeds van alles veranderd inclusief een conflict over de brug zelf met alle vertragingen vandien.
Welke borden staan hier op het ogenblik?
Neem anders even contact met Sander op.
Je kunt overigens weer mappen nu, maar niet dat fietspad verlengen naar de veerweg svp. :)
Jeroen_Koorn (2017-10-11 15:59:31+00:00): Ja, foutje om de brug te verlengen, fietspad was de bedoeling, de brug is in bedrijf en het fietspad sluit aan op de veerweg
eggie (2017-10-11 16:07:13+00:00): Oke..verander dan die driveway in een fietspad. Welk bord staat er? is het een highway=path zoals Sander het heeft gemapt.. of is het een G11 fietspad?  .. of toch gewoon nog die serviceweg?
eggie (2017-10-11 16:08:03+00:00): Kijk in ieder geval even hoe die andere paden zijn getagd.
Succes.
Jeroen_Koorn (2017-10-11 16:28:43+00:00): Het is voor zover ik weet nu een fietspad,  ik rij er morgen even langs
eggie (2017-10-11 16:51:46+00:00): Mooi.. 
laatste ontwikkeling op fietspaden-tag-gebied
Presets: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=31077
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=yes, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13

maar soms is het gewoon ene pad waar je ook mag fietsen. Ben benieuwd.
malajul (2018-02-03 01:07:49+00:00): Is there really no way to enter the apartment complex from Palmer Street? Thanks!
LemmingVegas (2018-02-03 03:10:43+00:00): well, there is a way to enter anything in the world :) But you are not supposed to.
The gate on Palmer street is only for exit, there is no way to open it from outside. You could sneak in after somebody is exiting, but that is wrong.
malajul (2018-02-05 17:45:53+00:00): Thanks! I am going to edit it just to make the last bit of road west of the parking lot one way to make it more clear.
drazde (2021-11-27 07:55:58+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai tolto la chiave name dal "sentiero dei serbi", è vero che è presente nella relazione, ma poi non questo non è renderizzato sul sito e neanche in una app che uso (osmand). Come sarebbe meglio meglio mappare in questo caso? altrimenti anche se il dato è presente questo non viene "usato"...
ivanbranco (2021-11-27 11:41:01+00:00): Ciao Drazde,

Simone ha corretto perché non si tagga per il renderer. Il dato viene usato in realtà, ci sono siti dedicati a questo tipo di rendering (per esempio https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/) e anche su OSMand puoi abilitare il layer per i percorsi escursionistici :)
drazde (2021-11-27 13:38:18+00:00): Ciao Ivan, si, so che non si tagga per il render.. il mio dubbio era più che altro perchè spesso non c'è uniformità a volte trovo i sentieri con il tag "name".
Il sito lo conoscevo e lo utilizzo molto (e non viene visualizzato comunque il nome) cmq grazie per l'intervento
simone_girardelli (2021-11-27 19:44:10+00:00): Ciao drazde, ho visto adesso che un'altro utente ha messo mano alla relazione distorcendolo un pò, domani vedo di metterlo a posto sulla base della traccia fornita da SAT, se non lo fa qualcun'altro.

Su OsmAnd di sicuro vedi il nome "O623B", in quanto codice del sentiero SAT, e questo di solito viene visualizzato, anche se OsmAnd è un bel pezzo che non lo uso quindi non ricordo.
Come ti è stato detto c'è la possibilità di attivare altri layer, anche se non so se il nome poi si vede, dipende dalla politica di rendering delle varie app o mappe.

quanto al nome sul sentiero, da quel che vedo il primo tratto del sentiero SAT parte dalla strada provinciale e sale per strada forestale/comunale che ha sicuramente nome suo, quindi si andrebbe ad interferire con altri nomi, la relazione aiuta a mantenere differenti le tipologie di percorsi/strade.

Per visualizzare il solo nome del sentiero invece di O623B, ovvero la classica bandierina rosso-bianco-rosso, non saprei consigliarti, waymarkedtrails lo fa selezionando il sentiero sul sito, ma non credo lo renderizzi su OsmAnd il solo nome.
drazde (2021-11-27 20:03:24+00:00): Si in osmand uso una sovrapposizione per vedere i nomi sat dei sentieri, il mio dubbio era se si dovrebbe vedere o meno il nome del sentiero come si conosce
simone_girardelli (2021-11-29 20:22:31+00:00): Ciao drazde, ho appena modificato il tracciato eliminando l'ambiguità, però dal tracciato gpx risulta una deviazione, ti metto un'immagine (link in fondo) da Josm con sotto il lidar, della PAT, ma con il cerchio giallo ti evidenzio il tratto che non risulta mappato, non conoscendo il posto, non so se si tratta di una deviazione "storica" o è, sul posto, correttamente segnalata.
Da pagina del sito sat, risulta precisione ottima, quindi non so se attualmente è così o meno (link alla pagina sotto).

Visto lo frequienti spesso, lascio a te l'onere di capire ede eventualmente correggere, grazie.


https://imgur.com/ACAmQzF


https://sentieri.sat.tn.it/webapps/qualita-rilievi
drazde (2021-11-30 07:05:31+00:00): Ciao Simone, il tracciato mi sembra mappato correttamente, il sentiero l'ho fatto questa primavera, riguardando il gpx che avevo tracciato e la heatmap di strava è molto preciso.
Solitamente uso la heatmap di strava, (sotto il link del portale e il link per utilizzarla in OSM) per correggere le traccie la trovo molto utile dato chè si basa su una quantità di gpx molto vasta
https://www.strava.com/heatmap
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava
eggie (2017-10-11 17:08:22+00:00): Dit is niet goed gegaan. je plakt het nieuwe fietspad op het oude.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52830542
eggie (2017-10-11 17:09:22+00:00): Wanneer een pad een andere weg kruist moet je altijd een verbindingsnode maken.
Ik kijk even. Graag reactie zodat wij weten dat je zaken oppakt.
CZet (2017-10-11 17:15:17+00:00): Ik ga nog maar eens even goed zitten voor de introductielessen. Bedankt voor de snelle reactie!
eggie (2017-10-11 17:16:02+00:00): Weer routeerbaar gemaakt. De fietspaden zaten niet vast aan elkaar. een deel zat op elkaar geplakt. je merkt als je net begint dat je tegen zulke zaken aanloopt. Beperk je in je edits en doe niet te veel.
Graag reactie
eggie (2017-10-11 17:17:32+00:00): Ook tegen eenrichting kun je niet fietsen. Het routeert dan niet meer goed.
Het is dus steeds van te voren denken wat je doet en nadien checken en niet direct naar het volgende item overgaan.
eggie (2017-10-11 17:24:33+00:00): Mocht je vragen krijgen, stel ze dan gerust. 
 
Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
In het begin volgen we de edits van startende mappers.. ook om te helpen. :)
eggie (2017-10-11 17:20:04+00:00): oke...
eggie (2017-10-11 18:38:36+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-10-11 18:41:06+00:00): Vraag : Bevindt dit laadstation zich in het midden van de straat?
freebeer (2017-10-12 00:10:28+00:00): Hallo eggie,
If you aren't aware (I am sure you must be), it seems to be a default of maps.me to create a new object, or post a bug report, on an existing node or way.
I see this everywhere in countries that are not so well looked-after as yours...
Thanks for your work in NL!
Robert Whittaker (2017-10-16 09:30:26+00:00): Are you sure the postcodes on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5161224522 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5161224521 are correct? According to Code-Point Open, EH4 8AJ is located on Strathalmond Park about over 5km away.
Chris Fleming (2017-10-30 15:06:14+00:00): Yes, I've just checked my notes and have that postcode completely  wrong. I've fixed it up now.
eggie (2017-10-11 17:31:13+00:00): Op een pedestrian hoeft geen tag bicycle no. Het is immers een voetgangers gebied. Haal je het eraf?
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-16 09:03:41+00:00): The roundabout is disconnected from the grid
Mishari (2018-12-26 06:48:05+00:00): Hi, you had linked the service road of FYI to pai singh to, it doesn't link to the back so I added a service way and linked to that instead. Thank you.
mweper (2017-10-11 21:52:01+00:00): Hola Mario. Si quieres añadir correctamente el colegio, deberías añadirle la etiqueta amenity=school para identificarla como tal. ¿Tienes alguna otra info que pueda servir (dirección, pagina web, tipo de escolaridad, etc)?
-
Si quieres armar correctamente todo el perímetro o contorno que ocupa la escuela, por favor, lee https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dschool Si no sabés como hacerlo, me puedes contactar para ayudarte. Suerte
literan (2017-10-11 16:38:10+00:00): Приветствую! Для подъездов надо использовать тег entrance=staircase
mavl (2017-10-11 17:56:05+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 45913747, 45913811, 45913915, 45913938, 45914017, 45914601, 45914873, 45915146, 45915197, 45915629, 45915737, 45915887, 45916462, 45917949, 45918000, 45918014, 45918123, 45918337, 45918477, 45918501, 45918776, 45918795, 45938028, 45938268, 45938328, 45938369, 45938598, 45938643, 45938785, 45939215, 45946367, 45946441, 45946563, 45947314, 45948101, 45948493, 45964725, 46037114, 46037130, 46037353, 46044033, 46044299, 46044380, 46045592, 46046119, 46046199, 46046272, 46046304, 46046407, 46046511, 46046558, 46046579, 46046613, 46046667, 46046696, 46046981, 46047090, 46047118, 46047145, 46047994, 46071320, 46071371, 46071656, 46071805, 46071896, 46071907, 46071981, 46072135, 46072333, 46072742, 46072838, 46073032, 46073427, 46073495, 46073751, 46073798, 46073824, 46077460, 46077678, 46078148, 46078487, 46078695, 46079514, 46079581, 46080127, 46080402, 46080783.
eggie (2017-10-11 17:22:50+00:00): Commentaar is vaag. Beschrijf wat je edit inhoudt.
Dus weg in tweeën gesplitst. Kun je echt niet meer van het ene deel naar het andere lopen? Is er geen pad?
eggie (2017-10-11 17:34:33+00:00): Parallelvoetpaden worden in de regel niet gemapt. Ze hebben hier ook geen verbinding met andere wegen en het routeert daardoor heel vreemd. Alleen als er een groenstrook zit tussen voetpad en rijweg zou je het evt. kunnen taggen. Haal de tag footway=sidewalk er svp ook af, want dat is een bug in editor iD.
Doe je het zelf?
eggie (2017-10-11 17:36:19+00:00): De kluwen van wegen op elkaar en fietspadaansluiting (Hofge Vaart) aan het einde van de Hanna Hilgersstraat heb ik verbeterd. 
je moet echt goed inzoomen. .. een node beetpakken. even bewegen en kijken wat er meekomt. dan pas opslaan.
eggie (2017-10-11 17:41:59+00:00): Die voetpaden zijn allemaal van mapper Vistaus. Die heeft Almere helemaal vol getekend met parallelpaden die nergens aan vastzitten. Wellicht kun je er nog wat van maken.
4004 (2017-10-12 22:02:31+00:00): не уверен, что нужно разделение выезда на 2 линии
Аndrey (2017-10-14 05:10:36+00:00): В том месте разметкой нарисован треугольный "островок безопасности".
4004 (2017-10-14 17:20:41+00:00): а, точно, прошу прощения
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-12 07:10:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52850503 where the changeset comment is: reverted known vandal changeset(s)
sommerluk (2017-10-12 23:48:48+00:00): Merci !
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-14 09:30:26+00:00): Hello Antonio Rey. In this changeset you have introduced the new key `La Riba`. What is it for? What is it in english? Keep in mind, keys should be in english ;-)
kingclimbers (2017-10-16 06:45:26+00:00): Hello!! It is a sport Climbing area. Penya Roja is a Climbing sector, La Riba is a Climbing area name and the village name
Nehaj (2018-04-30 19:57:04+00:00): Hi Verdy_p,

do you really think, that there is a 500 kV power line in Puerto Rico?

Greetings
Verdy_p (2018-04-30 21:07:25+00:00): I've not indicated any voltage, I just traced the visible lines or prolongated those that were only started.
Verdy_p (2018-04-30 21:08:09+00:00): look at the history to find who indicated the voltage initially. I can't tell that!
Verdy_p (2018-04-30 21:10:02+00:00): Notably look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52718816
Verdy_p (2018-04-30 21:10:20+00:00): This was done before me!
nickvet419 (2018-05-01 20:12:29+00:00): I did the same,  but anyone can go back and adjust the default values.
Verdy_p (2018-05-01 21:14:57+00:00): So you say you indicated "default values". In OSM there's NO default value at all to insert in the database, if you don't know, don't specify anything. Anytway I have not removed anything in existing tags, even if it's possible that I interconnected two segments of a line and joined them as there was by evidence no break at all: if this happens the merged way will have the tag coming for any one of the initial segment.. I did not merge any pairs of segments when there was a doubt with other incoming lines with intersections (we have some indicators of these intersections: angles, very irregular distance between poles, even if sometimes some angles are necessary to pass over some narrow valley with longer arcs, or get into a deep valley by creating short arcs near the summit to dive into the valley, or near the bottom of the valley, or when the line follows a valley to follow its curconvolitions by zig-zaging with alternances of short arcs in the curves and long arcs passing from one side of a river to the other side. Within dense urban sectors, electric lines tend to follow the streets (due ti higher buildings), in less dense residential areas they pass easily over houses and gardens, but generally they pass near the border of forests (or along rural tracks without tall trees), and tend to limit the changes of elevation. small hills are passed with longer arcs mounted on higher poles and pass over all tress, houses, rivers, roads, railways (however these long arcs are more exposed to wind, notably during hurricanes, the huge forces can break them as the arcs will be moving/extending/ relaxing repeatedly and there will be resonance of waves creating break opportunity at more positions of the wind wave length: huirricanes create shorter wave lengths than classic tempests or local storms, resonance of these waves are a severe difficulty and the only to stop these waves is to add more poles to absorbe them, and it is more difficult to do in dense residential areas, and why electric lines tend there to follow streets/roads even if winds near the ground may be amplified (but with more constant direction, less pulses, and less resonance effects: what is needed is just a way to keep the pole firmly in place to resist the traction forces, and make sure they are deedply grounded and resist water flows on the surface)
maraf24 (2017-10-13 12:42:43+00:00): Cześć:)
Bardzo bym  prosił przy kolejnych edycjach o pisanie w paru słowach w komentarzu, co zostało wyedytowane.
Dziękuję:)
user_5359 (2017-10-11 18:58:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
habi (2020-09-21 10:40:26+00:00): Ciao
Du hast https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5161519782 nur mit name=Pegasus eingetragen, was in JOSM als Fehler moniert wird.
Ist das die https://www.praxispegasus.ch/?
Gruss,
Habi
menzo2003 (2017-10-11 20:54:14+00:00): Bedankt voor de update.

De route om bij Leidsekade 99 t/m 107 te komen is via de trambaan. Ik ga die verbinding er weer in zetten. De acces tags van de trambaan moeten we daar ook op aanpassen.
Jay May (2017-10-15 19:29:02+00:00): Good evening. May I know why you are changing "ežeras" into "ež."? A couple of OSM wiki pages clearly state we mustn't use abbreviations.
Tomas Straupis (2017-10-15 20:16:59+00:00): Local agreements take precedence over international ones.
Jay May (2017-10-16 06:02:31+00:00): ... and where is the Lithuanian local agreement?
Tomas Straupis (2017-10-16 06:33:13+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lithuania
https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas
apm-wa (2018-07-23 02:09:35+00:00): This is the ambassador's residence, not the embassy chancery.
majid1359 (2017-10-11 18:47:58+00:00): اصلاح شد
majid1359 (2017-10-11 18:49:06+00:00): اصلاح شد
Aleks-Berlin (2017-10-12 07:30:44+00:00): Hi Payam007, please do not add keys like "/"="residential". See OSM wiki for valid keys. Thanks, Alex
PeterPan99 (2017-10-11 18:58:47+00:00): Sorry!  I pressed Update too quickly!!
Description should say, "Moved Kents Hill Primary School  to correct location.  Created construction site for Kents Hill Primary School."  Source:  Consultation document for Kents Hill Primary and Secondary Schools.