piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
xephos1one (2022-01-22 10:52:09+00:00): If you have to realign something always move the nodes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Moving the nodes of a house may also still be faster than deleting it and adding a new one (that you should max. only do with your newly mapped objects without any other history).
You can check the History of objects with Ctrl+Shift+C or via the menu on the right and then clicking on the way/node.

If you have questions regarding how to map particular things I'd recommend you to join one of these:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels

Your edits are looking much better now. :)
I'll still have a few hints for you:
a turning_circle is just this node in the middle without a street running around it.
Stop and give_way should always be on the way where the the sign is on and please add a direction (forward/backward) depending on which way the sign is facing.
The only exception are all-way-stops where you would add the stop on the crossing node and not where the signs are.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/ does a good job in stating how to map particular things.

Bye and have fun mapping :D
ottorol (2023-05-03 12:25:04+00:00): вопрос по столику для пикника. не увидел таковой возле скалы
user_5359 (2022-01-12 06:23:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You add 15 Nodes only with name and description. Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

You add also a closed business in the same way (see https://www.osm.org/node/9411818433/history). Why?
Allison P (2022-01-12 20:05:25+00:00): My bad.
Владимир К (2022-01-12 06:22:43+00:00): не надо отмечать бывшие територия действующими промышленными территориями, это неверно
Lucifer Kinoff (2022-01-12 10:47:03+00:00): У меня другое мнение на этот счет! Да, и кто вас назначил судией "верно-неверно"? Полномочия свои поднатужьтесь подтвердить, не то пойдете (публично!) в хорошо известном направлении...
Владимир К (2022-01-12 11:20:16+00:00): я руководствуюсь логикой.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dindustrial

тег обозначает територию используюЩУЮСя в промышленных целях,

если територия бывшего, значит в промышленных целях уже не используется. 

соизвольте общаться корректно.
Владимир К (2022-01-12 11:22:56+00:00): также напоминаю, что обозначать разобранные пути через railway=disused+name=разобр. тоже неверно. есть как минимум railway=razed
felipe77° (2022-01-12 05:17:45+00:00): error en fecha, sin efecto
ravali_78 (2022-01-13 05:20:49+00:00): Hi areynolds29,
Trust your doing well and welcome to OpenstreetMap! While mapping the Myanmar we have observed that unclassified road created  at the hospital. I have modified classification to service. Kindly check with way 1020457419,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116090596. Refer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified.
Happie mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116050067
felipeeugenio (2023-01-11 14:06:00+00:00): Hola Felipe
Habrán terminado ya la reparación de la Calle San Luis?
ha pasado mas de un año. La voy a dejar como transitable. Pero me confirmar por favor.
gracias
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
DUGA (2024-04-29 16:27:04+00:00): Your TIGER updates in this area is mostly questionable.

TIGER cleanup is not just for the tags, geometries need to be updated and fixed. Removing all tags leaves everyone else harder to track the actual junk from 2007.
Random Points (2022-01-13 12:18:51+00:00): There is Changi City Point (a mall), but never have I ever heard of Changi city. Singapore itself is city, but never individual suburbs/towns being another city in Singapore.
Random Points (2022-01-13 12:19:42+00:00): Downtown Core is a suburb in Singapore, but never a city by itself. There is only Singapore as both city and country.
rene78 (2022-01-17 00:56:23+00:00): @Laveure, you should address concerns that other users have about your changes. This is not the first time that you ignore comments about debatable edits.
jinalfoflia (2022-01-19 12:39:58+00:00): @Laveure,
Hi Laveure,

I agree with JaLoooNz. Downtown Core is not a city for sure and the best way to represent it is “suburb” as it was previously mapped.

We can refer to this for more details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dsuburb  for more information.

I'm going ahead and changing it back to suburb, doing the same for Changi and Jurong too. Thank you!
Random Points (2022-01-13 12:18:06+00:00): There is Woodlands town, but never have I ever heard of Woodlands city. Singapore itself is city, but never individual suburbs/towns.
Kelerei (2022-01-14 02:28:47+00:00): Actually, motorway to motorway junctions _are_ allowed, but are strongly discouraged (according to the highway=motorway wiki article anyway).  From the newly installed signage and road layout, this _may_ (but also may not!) be one of the rare situations where a motorway to motorway junction is acceptable.  Compare with the Ngauranga Interchange, which is mapped as a motorway to motorway junction and for which such mapping appears to be widely accepted.
Kelerei (2022-01-14 02:36:01+00:00): Probably also worth adding: the split in the northbound direction is on a slight right-hand curve on the Johnsonville-Porirua Motorway, so the physical geometry of the junction isn't too dissimilar from a Y junction.  The curves are really slight, so it's not very perceptible from the current LINZ imagery (might be more perceptible when we get post-construction imagery), but it is noticeable when you actually drive it.
julcnx (2022-01-14 06:33:19+00:00): Please kindly set a proper changeset description so that other mappers can understand your changes:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Please be aware, that accounts that do not follow guidelines may be reported for vandalism. Thank you for your understanding.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116052419
Dimacn (2022-01-12 11:52:39+00:00): Зачем вы удалили здание Соборная 3 ? Его снесли?
Ewen Hill (2022-02-25 22:28:46+00:00): Hi doublephaeton, Thanks for adding Hughes Place and a few other roads. If they are just on the planning board then it's better to mark these as 
highway=proposed
proposed=residential

If works have commenced then use these tags.
highway=construction
construction=residential

I'm not certain of the status of the road but happy to assist if you need and thanks again.
Ewen Hill (2022-02-25 22:32:21+00:00): Sorry, I have noticed that the road has been constructed and appears open - apologies for the previous message.
JeroenHoek (2022-01-12 07:32:21+00:00): There is already a car dealer mapped here. Is it gone?

Please add the link (https://www.lexus.nl/dealers/lexus-groningen) to the website=* key.

Add the address, or if the other car dealer has left (it looks like it), merge the shop node with the address node.
KostyaZAyAc (2022-01-12 15:12:40+00:00): Thanks for the advice that helps to improve the edits on the OSM, you can see the changes in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116070456
Thanks for your feedback.
JeroenHoek (2022-01-13 09:22:10+00:00): Thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-01-18 18:09:14+00:00): On jest wewnątrz budynku cze zewnątrz?

Bo jak na zewnątrz to skąd ta ograniczona dostępność?
geomarcin1972 (2022-01-18 18:40:49+00:00): Aed umieszczony jest na ścianie budynku na zewnątrz na prawo od wejścia. Teren posesji Centrum Kultury jest ogrodzony i po ostatnich zajęciach ok. godziny 21:00 często zamykana jest furtka i brama. Stąd w informacja o ograniczonej dostępności. Pozdrawiam. Marcin.
t_ja (2022-01-12 15:38:19+00:00): Ahoj,
v poznamke je vyslovne uvedene, ze tento usek nie je motorway, preto ma zaujima, z akeho zdroja si vychadzal. Mozes dolozit foto z autokamery, ze tam bola medzicasom osadena ina dopravna znacka? Ak nie, tak to prosim vrat do povodneho stavu.

T.
tlconrd (2022-01-12 07:43:03+00:00): oh, just because a house is located inside a wilderness/study area doesn't mean that person loses their land or access to their land. there are several properties within national parks that are still private property
highflyer74 (2022-01-12 13:05:45+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please be so kind to use proper changeset comments (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments).

As you are editing a lot of roads the community needs to know what you did and what your source of information is.

Please also read

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Thank you!
jambamkin (2022-04-28 09:22:01+00:00): Hi FlawOfAverages, I've bumped into a few buildings that you have outlined but left with no tags such as https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1032480333. I't snot  big deal just thought it might be helpful to point it out, so you can check whatever tool you are using
FlawOfAverages (2022-04-28 18:14:51+00:00): Hi there, jambamkin. It's me, I'm the tool :D I'll have scrolled away when doing an area and not remembered to go back to resolve them when I submitted the change. I have seen them on my OSMI issues list so I was intending to go back to them after sorting out any addressing issues I have made in some areas. As you say, not a big deal as people can either finish them off or just leave them and I will get to them in a bit.
jambamkin (2022-05-01 14:19:51+00:00): Good to know you are aware. I picked a few up, feels like a freebie to get my number of mapped buildings up :D So I certainly don't mind
user_5359 (2022-01-14 15:14:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the key "Автомобиль-ная дорога 55-241 ОП МР 17 (от Черлакского - Моисеевка - Дробышево) до автомо-бильной доро-ги Нововар-шавка -Черлакское"? See http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020483203
mosstreet (2022-01-13 10:07:28+00:00): В правке внесена ошибка по созданию перекрестка равнозначных дорог, при том что согласно разметке, установлены знаки о главной дороге
Seth3315720 (2022-01-14 07:32:33+00:00): Поясните пожалуйста о каком именно перекрестке идет речь и какие знаки приоритета?
Если Речь о Ленина-Колхозный... Ну всё одно не понимаю какой равнозначный перекресток, они по умолчанию все равнозначные.
Поясните, что Вы имеете ввиду, исправлю.
mosstreet (2022-01-15 10:38:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116055046#map=19/45.44585/40.70106 https://yandex.ru/maps/?l=mrc&ll=40.701243%2C45.445647&mrc%5Bid%5D=248311071&z=19
Seth3315720 (2022-01-17 08:11:06+00:00): Яснее не стало. В значение статуса дорог изменения не вносились, равно как не устанавливались и не удалялись теги приоритета. Изменена геометрия перекрестка. В приведенном Вами снимке, авто движущиеся справа и поворачивающие на лево двигаются прямо без заворотов. Это обычный Т-образный перекресток, хоть и широкий. Что касается знаков приоритета, так за этим нужно следить водителю а не двигаться "по приборам". На прокладку маршрута, приоритет проезда перекрестка никак не влияет.
mosstreet (2022-01-20 11:28:57+00:00): ПДД изучите а так же те таблички разноцветные что перед вами на дороге бывают
Seth3315720 (2022-01-20 11:41:14+00:00): Вместо того чтобы хамить. Объясните, какая связь между знаками на дороге и схемой карты. Карта это не путеводитель по приоритету дорог. Если у Вас есть желание, займитесь этим. В принципе, это не исключено. Но картирование приоритета перекрестков не популярно.
Ошибки нет. Одинаковая значимость дорог не создаёт ошибки, равно как на любом другом перекрестке.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
Frans S (2022-01-12 09:08:05+00:00): Hello Putri Hardini
Thanks for mapping on this project.
A question.
According to your records you used the Maxar Premium Imagery (As requested by the project)
However, you mapped also long buildings in a field which are only visible on the Maxar std imagery.
So there are other objects which are different or not present. Please be sure to use the Maxar Premium as only source.
Nest regards
Frans S (2022-01-12 08:55:31+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A question. You tagged quite a lot of buildings as building=bakehouse. Do you have local knowlegde?  If not, would you please change these taggings?
Standard in HOTOSM project buildings are to be tagged as building=yes since we cannot see what the use is.
You  also connected lots of buildings to each other with nodes.
For the same reason buildings are to be tagged without connecting them to eachother except it is obvious like terraced buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116055982
Zainab Ramadhanis (2022-01-12 09:23:58+00:00): Hello. Thanks for the feedback. My apologies, it was my mistake, I set a building preset and didn't realize several buildings are tagged as building=bakehouse (it is supposed to building=yes). I am working on fixing this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116055982
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-02 15:31:17+00:00): Do not use descriptive names on objects.
Pink Duck (2022-08-11 11:06:17+00:00): Pavements are usually surfaced with bitmac (bitumous McAddam), not concrete asphalt. surface=paved is fine for the user agents to understand suitability. Could always use surface=bitmac or surface=bituminous.
Dimacn (2022-01-12 12:04:42+00:00): Ваша правка расценивается как вандальная. Вы удаляете существующие дороги, рисуете вместо них новые, рисуете поверх существующих свои, и вообще не восстановили дороги. С какой целью вы это делаете?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-01-13 13:16:37+00:00): Advertisement and/or too any details in the description tag (description tag was not necessary, so I removed it)
maro21 (2022-02-12 18:01:31+00:00): Where are these street names come from?
ToniE (2022-01-12 09:31:47+00:00): Hi tymcat,

willkommen bei OSM.

addr:housenumber und addr:street sind öffentliche, postalische, keine DHL-internen Werte.

D.h. 

addr:housenumber 406 und addr:street=Paketshop sind falsch hier und müssen zurück-korrigiert werden.

Viele Grüße,
Toni
ToniE (2022-01-12 10:14:24+00:00): evtl. auch hier

ref=406 als DHL-interne Nummer des Paketshops
AndersAndersson (2022-01-12 23:50:21+00:00): Jag skulle inte säga att en raststuga har en adress. Däremot har den ett namn.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763457743

Namn är mer rimligt än adress då adresser är något som hanteras av myndigheter. De hanterar inte numreringen av campingstugor t.ex.
archie (2022-01-13 01:03:53+00:00): buildings bör inte ha några namn. dessa representeras istället av  addr:housename. Allt i enlighet med MapRoulette-projekt.
AndersAndersson (2022-01-13 14:59:49+00:00): Ok. kan vi vara överens om att det är myndigheter som hanterar adresser och att t.ex. raststugorinte har adresser?

Vem som helst kan väl skapa ett projekt. Det innebär inte att det är rätt.
Var kan jag hitta mer information om just detta projekt?
AndersAndersson (2022-01-13 15:00:31+00:00): Rastsugor "inte har adresser" skulle det stå.
AndersAndersson (2022-01-13 15:50:58+00:00): Är det denna så gäller den nordöstra England.
https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/21056
I England är det vettigt där man använder husnamn som adress. Definitivt inte i Sverige. Enda undantaget kan möjligtvis vara gårdsnamn eller platser som saknar riktiga adresser. Typ en fäbod. Resten känns mer som vandalism då du aldrig kan avgöra bakom skrivbordet varför en byggnad har ett visst namn.
Gör du en revert?
AndersAndersson (2022-01-16 12:12:58+00:00): Har du något mer att säga eller ska vi gå via Data working group?
archie (2022-01-16 13:28:32+00:00): Oh, gör dig inte besvär. Jag har redan anmält dig och ditt uppförande här till DWG.
ElliottPlack (2022-01-20 17:45:29+00:00): Hi there, Elliott with OSMF DWG. I hope I can help resolve the issue here but first I am a native English speaker only. Can you both communicate in English? If not, I can find a Swedish speaking DWG member.
AndersAndersson (2022-01-21 00:24:47+00:00): Hello
What is communicated in this changeset from my side is about the same as I wrote in my mail to you. A house (like a shelter in the forest) can have a name not being an address. Changing all house name to addresses is wrong.
I would want this chageset to be reverted.
Archie is for some reason complaining about my behaviour and claiming to have reported me to DWG for that. I can't really see the reason for that. No words from my side where offensive or written in anger. Just asking and stating facts.
ToniE (2022-01-12 09:38:24+00:00): Hi tymcat,

hier könnte man die Hermes-Paketshop-Nr. als

ref=637866

mappen.

Wird auch so bei DHL-Paketstationen gemacht.

Gruß,
Toni
tymcat (2022-01-12 09:50:43+00:00): Hi ToniE,
in welches Feld kommt das "ref" rein?
tymcat (2022-01-12 09:55:01+00:00): Ich versuche sinnvolle Adressangaben mitzuliefern, jedes Logistikunternehmen hat andere Anforderungen an die Adressierung und die sind meistens sehr versteckt.
Selber gelernt durch nervige Erfahrung. Bei Internetbestellungen essentiell, da die Masken der Bestelldienste oft nicht passen.
LG, Felix
ToniE (2022-01-12 10:13:46+00:00): Du musst ein neues Feld anlegen und der Name des Feldes ist 'ref' und der Wert ist "637866" - analog zu "addr:housenumber" ist der Name des Feldes ...
literan (2022-02-01 16:55:41+00:00): перестаньте баловаться
Dimacn (2022-01-12 11:56:31+00:00): Скажите, для чего вы добавили  эти линии/полигоны?
abrensch (2022-01-15 09:19:53+00:00): Hier war ein Rechts-Abbiege-Gebot bei der Ausfahrt aus dem Edeka:

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=314689413635800&focus=photo&lat=50.6102118&lng=8.7153425&z=17

nach Deinem Edit sind Reste davon jetzt an dem Nachbarknoten.

Sieht mir auch nach einem GeradeAusfahrverbot aus. Das kann man nur abbliden, wenn die gesamte Kreuzung wie bisher als ein Knoten gemapped ist statt jetzt 2 nach Deinem Edit.

Schaust Du mal?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
Trevor_1 (2022-04-19 23:03:10+00:00): Hi, is this block you created permanent, or temporary? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9412286865
adlid (2022-01-13 12:27:04+00:00): Hi,

The default Bing imagery is misaligned and should not be traced without correcting. You must first calibrate the offset in iD using a known good location source. See https://learnosm.org/en/josm/correcting-imagery-offset/

In the UK, the Cadastral layer (can be enabled in iD) is the best standard for aligning the imagery and shows that the previous location of these buildings was actually closer to correct.
adlid (2022-01-13 12:38:40+00:00): Actually the old positions were indeed way off and Bing seems to have a very variable offset round here. Ignore me :/
eggie (2022-01-12 10:48:50+00:00): Dag Jannie...  Een barrier=gate kan altijd open.. Dus het zal geen regulier verkeer tegenhouden.
Wanneer de parking alleen in gebruik is bij evenementen dan wellicht access=customers op gates, parking en wegen op het parkeerterrein.

Verder zijn sommige barriers geen gates hier maar barrier=lift_gate
Die houden motorvoertuigen per default tegen.
Je kunt accesstags toevoegen.
access=yes (Het routeert)
access= private of customers.. Dan routeert het niet.
Geen tag.. Dan routeert een lift_gate ook niet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dlift_gate
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-12 10:51:14+00:00): Als voorbeeld een hek aangepast naar slagboom aan het eind van de Tiber.. Nog zonder accesstags.
gr eggie
JannieA (2022-01-12 12:59:55+00:00): Dank voor de feedback. Ik heb het aangepast. De gate die jij had aangepast zijn eigenlijk twee gates, een slagboom en een hek.
eggie (2022-01-12 13:01:53+00:00): Oke.. up to you!
Gr eggie
JeroenvanderGun (2022-01-14 23:55:21+00:00): I reverted your additions to the Country of the Netherlands. ISO 3166 assigns the codes to the Kingdom of the Netherlands, which is a different OSM relation.

https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:code:3166:NL

The Kingdom of the Netherlands relation already has the ISO 3166 codes:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2323309
pantufla (2022-01-15 09:16:27+00:00): Oh, thank you. I'm sorry I didn't notice.
mike140 (2022-01-30 15:25:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13367782
Domkot_Free (2022-01-31 06:30:49+00:00): Дякую за вказівку, виправив
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-06-19 09:51:12+00:00): Jeg har fjernet access=yes fra stierne da de tillod fx motorkøretøjer.
andershl (2022-06-19 15:02:44+00:00): Så møj manne tak. Har ikke været bevidst om, at dette tag var sat, og slet ikke om dets implikationer...
ToniE (2022-01-12 10:54:04+00:00): Hi,

hab's auf ref=406 korrigiert, denn das bezieht sich auf amenity=post_office (den Paketshop) und '#' ist not notwendig
ToniE (2022-01-12 10:56:07+00:00): Hi,

auch hier korrigiert auf ref=637866
ChehrehBargi (2024-04-26 20:58:56+00:00): You have used the wrong relationships in your business registration and have made errors in other places.
ChehrehBargi (2024-04-26 21:00:32+00:00): Similarly, with your editing, the relationship between the two bank buildings has been damaged.
Leo Slager (2022-01-13 11:45:04+00:00): reverted with my changeset 116103135
tordans (2022-01-13 12:09:10+00:00): Hallo Joculari, nur zur Info eine Berliner Eigenheit: Wir haben in den meisten Fällen die Adresse+Hausnummer als einzelne Node "über" dem Haus liegen. Streetcomplete kann das nicht wissen und macht nichts falsch; ich habe es aber trotzdem mal ins System gebracht https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116104106.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116061232
RicoElectrico (2022-01-12 13:51:28+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za dodanie przedszkola. W tej edycji przypadkiem przesunęłaś sklep: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/1772853406
Lee Carré (2022-01-12 22:29:45+00:00): Thankyou! 🙂