piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pgiraud (2015-03-02 06:39:50+00:00): If you try to execute the following request in overpass-turbo, you'll get all the country capitals of the world.
Yesterday, only some capitals from South America were missing.
If I don't use the "admin_level" filter, I get way too much nodes back.

[out:json]
[timeout:25]
;
(
  node
    ["capital"="yes"]
    ["admin_level"="2"];
);
out body;
>;
out skel qt;
muralito (2015-03-02 13:07:41+00:00): In my opinion your query should be 

<osm-script output="json" timeout="25">
  <!-- query part for: “id:2418275” -->
  <query type="relation">
    <has-kv k="boundary" v="administrative"/>
    <has-kv k="admin_level" v="2"/>
  </query>
  <!-- get childs with role=forward -->
  <recurse type="relation-node" role="admin_centre" />
  <!-- print childs -->
  <print mode="body"/>
  <recurse type="down" />
  <print mode="skeleton" order="quadtile"/>
</osm-script>

and not adding the admin_level tag to the nodes.

Remeber, "Don't map for the renderer"
muralito (2015-03-02 13:08:26+00:00): Here is the permalink to the query.

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/7WZ
naoliv (2015-05-06 21:02:07+00:00): Please, don't add "admin_level=2" to Brasilia.
See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28340149 for the exactly same problem.
mapper999 (2015-03-02 08:09:17+00:00): Hallo FF189,
herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Könntest du bitte erklären, warum du "amenity=driving_school" gelöscht hast? Dieser Tag wird benötigt um die Fahrschule als "Fahrschule" zu kennzeichnen.
siehe dazu auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Ddriving_school
SomeoneElse (2015-03-02 12:42:20+00:00): Hi, just spotted you patched up a "doubling back" way in Brichover by a newbie here.  Did you send them any sort of "hello and welcome" email to help them not do the same thing again?
SomeoneElse (2015-03-02 21:44:24+00:00): This looks very much like a mechanical edit.  Was it discussed anywhere first?  Regardless or not of whether or not the tag change would make sense it would be only polite to let people know that you're changing the data that they are consuming, so that they get some warning that their maps or calculations based on extracted data will no longer show some things because tags have been changed without warning underneath their feet.
dexterslu (2015-03-02 01:02:32+00:00): Woah, please revert. You cannot dump the entire City of Detroit address points all at once. The data pulled from the City of Detroit's data portal is quite old and does not reflect the 10,000+ demolitions that have occurred over the last couple years.
naoliv (2015-06-28 03:57:18+00:00): amoriello, de onde você tirou o nome das ruas?
amoriello (2015-06-28 16:15:08+00:00): Bom dia naoliv,

como sempre faço viajo para Ilha Comprida e no começo do ano não foi diferente, aluguei uma casa em ilha Comprida recebendo somente o endereço para chegar a mesma, "Rua Dona Emília, 500" e ao pesquisar vi que os nomes das Ruas estavam erradas e muitas não constavam o nomes do banco de dados do OSM podendo chegar somente pelas coordenadas como o fiz, e como gosto de contribuir com OSM andei umas três horas por varias ruas e anotando os nomes corretos, e alinhando e inserindo ruas que não constavam no mapa, sou o que alguns diria louco ficar dirigindo por varias horas gastando combustível gravando trilhas e contribuindo com algo que considero muito legal compartilhar sem receber nada em troca.
não contribuo somente com o OSM mas também com o TRC, Here e TomTom, apesar que os dois ultimos demoram para fazer as atualizações que envio para eles.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-01 21:53:44+00:00): Hotel Ameliówka leży w Ameliówce, a nie w Masłowie - poprawiłem.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-01 21:54:59+00:00): Znaczy - miałem na myśli Mąchocice Kapitulne.
zito-pl (2015-03-01 21:43:28+00:00): Brak lewoskrętu z Grunwaldzkiej w Jasną.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-01 23:40:40+00:00): W miejscowościach bez ulic stosujemy addr:place= zamiast addr:city=
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760

Zachęcam również do przesiadki na JOSM.
gormo (2015-03-03 07:45:47+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier die Markau doppelt eingetragen (bzw. es gab teilweise schon eine, und du hast noch eine dazugemappt). Konkret hier http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.82256&mlon=10.22265#map=17/51.82257/10.22265 .
Kannst du da nochmal drübergucken und die Doppelungen wegnehmen? Vielen Dank!
woodpeck (2019-03-21 21:40:49+00:00): Hello release_candidate, DWG has received a complaint from a resident saying that the path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330874722 does not exist and is on private property. I realize it's been a while, but do you remember anything about adding this path and is it possible that they are right?
emacsen (2015-03-02 18:03:07+00:00): This is a great first edit!
Mazzilli16 (2015-03-09 16:25:35+00:00): @emacsen Thanks for the feedback! I appreciate it :)
dolphinling (2015-03-02 18:40:34+00:00): Hi,
This looks like an import. In general, imports are supposed to follow the procedure at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines, which includes things like talking with the community so they can discuss the potential impact, making sure the data is high quality and can be properly matched up with data that's already there, and making sure the new data is licensed in a way that's actually legal to import.

For this changeset in particular, the data seems good, but I noticed a few places where it didn't match up well with the existing data in the map, either because there was a road to the water nearby that the new data didn't match with or because the slipway was already marked and the new data added a second copy of it.

More problematic, though, I couldn't find any license for the data. All I could find was the site's general copyright statement: "This site is protected by copyright and trademark laws under both United States and International law. All rights reserved. © 2011 - 2014, NH Fish and Game Dept." That isn't enough to say it's legal to add to OSM.

I recommend you post on the imports mailing list describing the data and the work you did to add it. This will give the community a chance to look through and discuss the changes.
Parcanman (2015-03-02 19:25:58+00:00): This is an import, but I personally went through each and every point to verify that it is where it's supposed to be before uploading the changeset.

The data is from the state's fish and game department and every aspect of this data is simply describing the location of a public boat launching facility.
zool (2015-03-03 13:42:51+00:00): Following the import guidelines - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines - it is important to discuss and document a signficant import before adding to OSM. This should help to ensure a more coherent data model as well as a harmonious community.

As it stands, this and the other boat access bulk import at  http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29193535 haven't been through the process suggested by the guidelines and have been flagged up as problematic to the DWG, so we will have to go ahead and revert these changes. Wishing you luck in the discussion of the import.
zool (2015-03-03 15:00:43+00:00): Reverted, along with the other changeset at 29193535, on behalf of the DWG.
Graf Westerholt (2022-03-30 11:01:32+00:00): Warum hast du Reformhaus Grüssing als nur bio eingetragen?
zool (2015-03-02 15:15:56+00:00): hello Parcanman,

This looks like a mass import of data from a third party source that hasn't been discussed with the wider OSM community.

You may not be aware there are import guidelines http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines including an imports@ discussion list, where mass additions to OSM of this kind should be discussed; there you should be able to get help with most appropriate tagging for the data and linking it to objects already in OSM.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imports

Another mapper has been in touch with the Data Working Group to complain about this undiscussed import and request that we revert it, along with http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29192498

It would be good to hear your opinion, as it stands the DWG is likely to go ahead and revert these undiscussed imports...
Parcanman (2015-03-02 19:30:52+00:00): This is an import of public data from the state department of fish and wildlife.  Before submitting it I personally viewed each and every point to make sure that it is where it is supposed to be using bing with the proper alignment.  All of the data in this post is individual nodes describing the location of a public boat launch facility.

I'll admit that I may have created a few duplicates by accident,
jremillard (2015-03-02 22:39:05+00:00): The tagging includes all of the source files attributes and there are duplicates. Please revert the changeset, and follow the import process. The tagging issues and duplicate points can easily be addressed with a bit more more up front preparation time.
Nakaner (2015-05-26 19:43:05+00:00): Du hast das mit der enforcement-Relation leider nicht ganz verstanden. role=from wird nicht als Tag verwendet. In einer Relation kann jedes Mitglied eine Rolle haben. Der Node, von dem der Geblitzte her kommt, bekommt die Rolle "from". Das trägt man im Relationseditor ein. Dafür gibt es in iD unter "Alle Relationen" das Feld "Rolle". Ich habe es korrigiert.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/209078307

Ich habe nicht danach geschaut, wie oft du den Fehler noch gemacht hast. Relationen, die so getaggt sind, wie diese, werden von den Datennutzern nicht ausgewertet.
TZorn (2015-05-27 07:57:41+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich schau nach, wo ich das noch so gemacht haben könnte.
Paul Berry (2015-03-06 12:42:45+00:00): Motorway regulations don't apply until the route is signed, which is immediately after the footpath crossing, so this part is not a motorway. You'll notice there are similar changes of classification on the slip roads elsewhere about this junction.

Thanks.
matteo_ (2015-03-04 21:59:59+00:00): non vedo l'ora di scaricare delle mappe aggiornate da osm e caricarle sul mio garmin, in tal modo allorquando mi toccherà di passare nei dintorni di via casino fondrini potrò ammirare sul mio garmin un edificio con scritto sopra barol's home. sweet emotion
Barol (2015-03-09 13:17:23+00:00): Vale la stessa cosa per me per il suo edificio. Anche se purtroppo Matteo's home non appare la zona di Moniga mi sembra alquanto interessante.
Credo che farò un giro nelle sue zone quando programmerò di andare in direzione Rocca\Punta Sasso.
Goffredo (2015-03-08 12:50:24+00:00): gli attributi addr:* non vanno inseriti sulle strade, ma sui civici o sugli edifici
Barol (2015-03-08 14:29:04+00:00): Grazie per il chiarimento.
Ho cominciato da poco a mappare su osm e sono ancora un neofita.
luiswoo (2015-03-02 15:28:41+00:00): Зачем был удалён "Дистанционный столб", он же "Верстовой столб", притом без комментариев?
АДВ (2015-03-03 09:04:09+00:00): Извините! случайно так произошло, хотел исправить, но не удалось пропал интернет. Исправьте пожалуйста.
canfe (2019-04-12 10:39:17+00:00): Il campo da gioco per che sport è?
Va indicato.
dudka (2015-03-02 11:41:54+00:00): це не "виправлення", а дублікат
dudka (2015-03-02 11:40:36+00:00): це не "виправлення", а помилка
dudka (2015-03-02 11:40:44+00:00): повертаю назву
SomeoneElse (2015-03-04 16:44:21+00:00): This is a large changeset, but in terms of the geographical area that it covers and the number of ways affected.  How do I know, without going through each of the 27 pages of ways individually or using an external site if any of them affect my local area?

It'd be much better if you could use smaller changeset bounding boxes and more meaningful changeset comments - "div. Adresskorrekturen" doesn't say what was wrong and was fixed or what the source was.
Nakaner (2015-03-05 16:19:28+00:00): In mehreren Diskussionen im Forum in der Vergangenheit (siehe u.a. den Thread zur Schiersteiner Brücke) hat sich der Konsens herauskristallisiert, dass wir Baustellen erst ab einer Dauer von sechs Monaten (manche befürworten sogar neun Monate) Mindestdauer mappen. Für kürzere Zeiträume gibt es Conditional Restrictions (z.B. am Grötzinger Tunnel angewendet). Ich werde daher die Brücke umtaggen. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Conditional_restrictions http://www.ka-news.de/region/karlsruhe/Karlsruhe~/Bahnhof-Bruecke-gesperrt-Droht-Hagsfeld-der-Verkehrskollaps;art6066,1593505
SomeoneElse (2015-04-02 13:21:14+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Currently http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330911514 isn't actually joined to anything and I suspect that the name of it isn't really "A646 Cycle Lane" (at least I never remember seeing that name when driving down here).

In OSM, a "highway=cycleway" is usually used for separate infrastructure, not something that's part of the road (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycleway ).  What you might be looking to add here is probably better described as a cycleway=lane (if it's a lane on the road) or cycleway=track) if it's a separate track or a shared pavement.
Владимир К (2017-04-04 13:27:58+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3379454092 здесь ведь в названии высота, да? причем не над уровнем моря, а просто высота?
uname (2017-04-04 19:02:51+00:00): да это просто высота исскуственного обьекта. в данном случае террикона и да просто в названии. было обсуждение. высоту указывать на вершине а название и остальные данные на полигоне. поскольку вершин бывает более чем одна.
Владимир К (2017-04-04 19:07:06+00:00): ну если просто высота, то ведь есть тег для этого height. А то я взялся выправлять тег ele(точки вместо запятых в десятичном разделителе и просто число высоты из name в ele перенести), и пришлось выкидывать ваши natural=peak из правки.
uname (2017-04-04 22:07:58+00:00): вы там еще поищите ты тыщ 60 исскуственных обектов типа валуны курганы и прочие точно также высота в теге name. это не то чтобы общепринято, но весьма удобно и досих пор никого не раздражало. лично мне удобно видеть высоту ориентиров на карте в любом рендере. дело ваше. когдато абсолютно все горные отвалы по донецкой и луганской области даже очень старинные вместе с курганами историческими были аккуратно отмечены, классифицированы и занесены в спечиальные отношения. потом когото неустроил русский язык в name, комуто высота не там, комуто еще чтото. там вобще должен быть не пик и не натурал, нет подходящего... всё за 2-3 года настолько испоганили разрушили единообразие что вобщемто пофигу. делайте как считаете нужным. пока у вас есть время и желание хоть чтото делать в этой помойке.
tosky (2015-03-02 15:27:40+00:00): Questa via ciclabile: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330914660
passa sopra le strade esistenti ma  senza intersezioni; ha proprio quella forma?
poryhawaii (2015-03-03 11:15:48+00:00): Perdonami, in realtà si interrompe in prossimità della strada ed è presente un'attraversamento ciclo/pedonale...come mi suggerisci di modificarla? Meglio inserire un attraversamento o interrompere la pista e farla riprendere dopo la strada? Scusa, ma sono le mie prime modifiche...volevo dare un contributo anch'io, ma devo imparare un po' prima...
tosky (2015-03-03 21:21:43+00:00): Non sono espertissimo di ciclabili; in generale, se due entità (vie) si intersecano devono avere un punto in comune (attenzione: diverso è il caso in cui se si sovrappongono, ad esempio un ponte o un sottopassaggio, in cui è giusto che non abbiano punti in comune).

Se poi la via si interrompe, come mi sembra di vedere dalle foto satellitari, conviene sì interromperla e agganciarla alla strada nel punto in cui finisce/inizia.
Però attraversare impunemente la strada in mezzo a delle corsie vicino alla rotonda, no :)

In generale il wiki del progetto ha un bel po' di documentazione a partire dalla guida per principianti (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Beginners%27_Guide), ma forse l'hai vista anche tu, inclusi i contatti (mailing list, IRC, ecc) della comunità italiana. Infine, se vuoi maggior controllo posso suggerire l'uso dell'editor JOSM invece di iD (quello integrato).
t_ja (2015-03-06 21:27:27+00:00): Ahoj, 
pred nahratim budov do OSM treba premazat zbytocne body, napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330916849 ma 6 bodov z stacia pritom 4, alebo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330916339 ma 11 bodov a staci 8. Odhadom tak stvrtina budov ma aspon jeden nadbytocny bod.
Prosim precisti si tento changeset.
Dik vopred.
gryphon (2015-03-06 19:15:56+00:00): Не надо обозначать спортивные школы как amenity=school, этот тег для общеобразовательных учреждение. Для спортивных - amenity=training, training=sport
Подробности тут http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=20352

Поправьте, пожалуйста
Поправьте, пожалуйста
nicke83 (2015-03-04 04:48:13+00:00): Shop changed
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-04 19:23:24+00:00): Is this a self service bicycle tool stand? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3379605184/history
dieterdreist (2015-03-03 11:05:37+00:00): highway type is likely not living street. Driveway is not connected.
Saxonyking (2019-07-14 07:22:55+00:00): Warum wurde die Chemnitzer Straße von highway=secondary in residential geändert?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
zimba (2015-03-02 17:20:18+00:00): Habe diese Aenderung rueckgaengig gemacht: "Schrebergaerten" ist zu generisch fuer einen Namen und durch den landuse eh schon klar was es ist, und die Gebaeudeumrisse sind nur noch schraeger geworden, das Haus in der Schuetzenstrasse war komplett deformiert. Hab dafuer jetzt in der Umgebung ein paar Adressen nachgetragen. lg
changchun_1 (2015-04-26 06:31:03+00:00): Hallo mischuer, Wegeigenschaften werden nicht als Namen angegeben. "name=Trail" ist falsch.
Josef73 (2018-11-18 08:19:22+00:00): Hello, when is the Tabac Presse de Rompsay open?
emmanuelalex (2018-11-18 18:48:03+00:00): Monday to Friday : 06h45-13h00 / 14h00-19h00.
Saturday : 07h15-12h30.
Sunday : closed.
Josef73 (2018-11-19 19:33:49+00:00): Thanks. I change the tag opening_hours
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:13:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:13:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
kuhni74 (2025-02-02 12:10:24+00:00): Where do you have the name "Sisne" and its elevation for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3379901668 from? I'm only aware of a rural municipality and a himal called Sisne, which are both west of Dhaulagiri (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1354684537, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10494404). In FinnMaps, the peak you call Sisne is neither named nor has it an elevation (which is peculiar, since it is one of the highest around), but it may be close to 6000m.
kuhni74 (2025-02-02 12:12:44+00:00): Sorry, I mismatched two peaks in FinnMaps - the peak you named Sisne has elevation 5973m there, and the north-east neighbour is untagged.
seichter (2025-02-02 15:41:11+00:00): The name and height (19791 ft) are from an US Army Map out of the license-free Perry Castaneda Library at Texas University, 1:250000 Jumla NH 44-11 (1954).
The actual official name may differ and very often names change from one valley to the other.
Height and precise coordinates may vary, too, since a differing projection and geoid model have been used.
kuhni74 (2025-02-02 16:22:26+00:00): Thank you very much - ah, now I realise that you already gave the source of your mapping in the CS source anyway.
Unfortunately, I cannot find a Sisne and / or 6032m peak on http://maps.lib.utexas.edu/maps/jog/india/nh-44-11-jumla-nepal-china.pdf
I only find the peak 5852m there (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3380368710, few km to the SE), and peak 5864m (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3380368925, few km to the NW). So the puzzle remains unsolved?
kuhni74 (2025-02-02 18:45:30+00:00): Ah, I think I found the right map: https://maps.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ams/india/nh-44-11.jpg (U.S. Army Map Service AMS, not India Joint Operations Graphic Series JOG). The terrain information from the AMS map is terrible in this area, compared to the JOG map or more recent maps. AMS valleys run over real ridges etc. By the way, on https://maps.lib.utexas.edu/maps/ams/india/nh-44-12.jpg, Kande Hiunchuli (in western Kanjiroba Himal) is also called "Sisne Himal", probably because they mixed it up with Hiūnchuli Pātan in that Sisne Himal which is situated west of Dhaulagiri Himal.
I'd suggest omitting the AMS data completely.
seichter (2025-02-02 21:13:00+00:00): You are right, the height information is from the AMS and not from the JOG map.
I agree that the AMS map is very inaccurate in this region. But I wouldn't rely too much on horizontal position of any topographic map and aerial image in high mountains.
A better indication is obtainable on DEM-based maps like Tracestrack Topo Universal since these data are derived from Altimeters which look down perpendicular at a 30 m horizontal grid. Position of sharp peaks can therefore be well located in that grid. Height is less reliable since each single radar return contains contributions of a large span of heights.
Looking at the DEM-Map countour lines I consider several of your lately introduced peak positions based on FinnMaps as also considerably inaccurate.
kuhni74 (2025-02-02 21:32:44+00:00): I agree that the position and elevation of sharp Himalaya peaks remain with some uncertainty. Tracestrack Topo has indeed better DEM data than the SRTM data, but it is still far from being more precise than FinnMaps. When I was mapping peaks recently, I tried to find an "average" position between the various aerial photographs, FinnMaps and DEM. Usually I omitted sources if there was obvious significant distortion or DEM error (the latter often results from clouds during the DEM mapping).
Anyways, me first reason for asking was about a probable error of several 10s of kms due to a peak mismatch. This was not because of minor measurement uncertainties.