piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Carto'Cité (2023-02-06 12:00:21+00:00): Salut Furdrien,
Merci pour ton retour. Ok je prends ton avis sur le choix track/lane et je corrige.
Tu me diras ce que tu penses du rendu. Moi je ne peux pas m'en passer et je l'améliore de temps en temps. Il me révèle vraiment bien les aménagements et les éventuelles erreurs.
À bientôt.
Charles
Furdrien (2023-02-10 17:08:00+00:00): Salut Charles !

Merci pour ta compréhension ! Je suis curieux de savoir comment cela est carto autre part en idf mais je n'ai trouvé pas d'exemples pertinents... 

J'ai essayé ton rendu JOSM et il est très agréable et permet clairement de ne pas faire d'erreur sur les gauche/droite ! 
Je valide ! Merci du partage !

a + 

Furdrien
Carto'Cité (2023-02-12 16:17:56+00:00): Merci pour ton retour ! 😀
Charles
ashs_as (2022-12-01 11:17:59+00:00): Hello Nano Iglesias;
We notice that you add the tag "barrier=wall" to that way:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517966640
 and we think there is something wrong because there is no wall all over the way so please could you explain more what is this for?
Regards,
ashs_as
Nano Iglesias (2022-12-01 22:59:52+00:00): I din´t added this thing. I erased an erratic line crossing moroccan dessert. I didn´t edit something in Algeria. You can see I´m editing the moroccan border wall, adding access tracks and improving building accuracy there. Maybe this line is part of the erratic line I erased and remains like mine, but it´s not the case.  I never put this thing. 
Kind Regards.
Nano Iglesias (2022-12-02 00:14:33+00:00): Anyway . I´ve just erased the whole line, so problem resolved. There are some weird lines drawn in this zone between Morocco and Algeria. Even they are not tagged . Just lines . 
Glad to see there´s people taking care of osmand maps , taking a look what´s people painting here
Regards 
Nano
ashs_as (2022-12-04 06:48:50+00:00): Hello Nano Iglesias;
Thank you for your comment and fixing the issue.
Regards
ashs_as
johantiden (2022-11-24 18:09:54+00:00): Fint mappat!

Är du säker på att det är cykelvänligt genom lekparken? Jag skulle nog snarare sätta det som endast highway=footway genom hela lekparken.

Det sticker ut speciellt eftersom resten av Rålis inte är mappat som cykelväg.

Kolla kartan nedan:
https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=15/59.3285/18.0242/cyclosm
Elias Sjögreen (2025-07-13 14:46:31+00:00): Lite sent svar, men jag tror* (2 år sedan nu, så lite osäker) att jag tänkte att dessa vägar var avsedda för lekcyklarna som fanns att låna i parkleken och därmed mappade jag dom som cykelväg. Nu i efterhand så känns det på sätt och vis fel eftersom det inte är för normala "cyklar".
highflyer74 (2022-11-24 06:03:33+00:00): Moin!

Kleiner Hinweis: Windkraftanlagen bekommen keinen Namen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:generator:method=wind%20turbine?uselang=de). Alle wichtigen Daten sind bereits in anderen Tags vorhanden.

Ein wichtiger Grundsatz von OSM ist, dass wir keine Tags hinzufügen, nur um eine bessere Darstellung auf einer bestimmten Anwendung zu erzielen. Die Idee ist anders herum: die Anwendung muss sich an OSM anpassen und die Tags entsprechend auswerten. Weitere Informationen dazu findest du hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_for_the_renderer
highflyer74 (2022-11-24 06:45:30+00:00): Entschuldige, falscher Wikiartikel verlinkt. Jetzt aber: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:generator:source%3Dwind
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-11-28 12:03:39+00:00): Das ist mir auch aufgefallen. Vor allem das doppelte Erfassen der Kennzeichen mittels ref und name ist nicht OK, da redundant. Die Verwendung von ref ist richtig und sinnvoll! Ich lösche daher die name-Tags.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
Benoît C MdP (2022-11-24 08:17:41+00:00): Bonjour frutruc,

Le marquage est certes plutôt effacé sur Fleming, mais il y a bien les panneaux carrés C113 en entrée. Donc pour moi, les bandes cyclables sont toujours là sur cette rue.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
frutruc (2022-11-27 19:01:24+00:00): Bonjour Benoît,
OK, je fais donc une demande sur DansMaRue. 
Dans les faits, sans peinture, pas de trace de la bande cyclable.
Bonne continuation également
user_17724595 (2022-11-25 20:09:27+00:00): .
user_17724595 (2022-11-25 20:09:09+00:00): .
user_17724595 (2022-11-25 20:08:49+00:00): .
tordans (2022-11-23 05:59:40+00:00): Hey henningmz, a good pattern of mapping for those cases is IMO to tag the main key with „disused:amenity: (live cycle prefix) so we can update the shop once it re-opened.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129257368
hnghng (2022-11-23 10:58:38+00:00): Thanks for the info. I'm kinda new to this, but I'll look into it!
user_17724595 (2022-11-25 20:08:27+00:00): .
user_17724595 (2022-11-25 20:43:31+00:00): Sorry for spamming comments.
 
It seems that if I comment on my own changesets they get reassigned to my latest username in OSMCha, so I did that.

If I filter by my current or previous username it will show only some of my edits. I have to filter by my user id to see all of my edits on the same page on OSMCha. This is very annoying and if I had known this would happen I wouldn't have even changed my username.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129257477
flohoff (2022-11-29 23:03:34+00:00): Moin,
das mit dem natural=grassland auf der geschlossenen Mülldeponie halte ich für falsch. 

Das ist und bleibt eine Mülldeponie. Ich halte da landcover= für richtiger. Mag ja mit Gras bewachsen sein - bleibt aber eine Mülldeponie

Und "Müllberg" Ist ja auch eher Description als Name.

Flo
DeFra85 (2022-11-30 12:28:09+00:00): Hej,
aber die Deponie ist ja seit Ewigkeiten geschlossen, wurde abgedeckt/versiegelt, seit mehreren Jahren renaturiert und in kürze ja als Naherholungsgebiet für die Öffentlichkeit freigegeben.

"Müllberg" würde ich in local_name ändern, da er im Dorf durchaus gebräuchlich ist.
HellMap (2022-11-23 10:42:28+00:00): Hi!

Was there a reason to delete address node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9887775286/history ? These are from official VZD data, so they are technically correct and the bot will just readd it later anyway.

Thanks.
dadavid (2022-11-22 23:24:32+00:00): Da die Mehrheit der bestehenden Haltestellen mit U-Bahn das tagging subway=yes verwendet habe ich die verbleibenden Relationen daran angepasst. 

Siehe dazu auch den Thread im Forum: 
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hilfe-fur-overpass-query-fur-u-bahn-haltebereiche-in-munchen/5597
IgorEliezer (2022-11-29 04:27:02+00:00): Você tem um mapa que mostra a serra com este nome?
jeslop (2022-11-23 11:27:47+00:00): Hola Suburbanos-RENFE, bienvenido a OSM.

Este tipo de acciones no tiene cabida en el mapa, abstente de realizarlas porque los cambios van a ser revertidos y tu cuenta podría ser bloqueada.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
ma-rt-in (2022-11-24 17:42:18+00:00): Hallo,

bist du dir sicher mit deiner Änderung? Ich habe nicht das Gefühl du warst vor Ort und gesehen das die Bar nach 2 Jahren wieder aufmacht.

vg
zwombie (2022-12-01 22:48:54+00:00): Hallo Ma-rt-in, ja ich bin mir sicher, ich wohne nebenan. Was gibt dir dieses Gefühl?

Gruß
ma-rt-in (2022-12-04 12:10:16+00:00): Hallo,
das du keine Details ergänzt hast. Holst du das noch nach?
vg
zwombie (2022-12-04 12:28:36+00:00): ja, habe schon etwas nachgetragen, die Öffnungszeiten muss ich noch herausfinden.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-02 00:18:27+00:00): Do not change valid service roads into a golf cartpath.  This is blatantly wrong and has been wrong for 3+ months.  User has been referred to DWG.
Violaine_Do (2023-01-09 23:50:52+00:00): iaorana et mauruuru pour tes contributions. Attention le nom doit être le nom du lieu. Le "made by" se retrouve via le contributeur du lieu mais n'a rien a faire dans le nom. Merci et bon mapping. Et pour la suite autre bonne pratique: spécifier le type de mise a jour que tu as fait dans ton commentaire de changement.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129259223
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 06:55:00+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164842492
Polarbear (2023-05-15 13:08:13+00:00): Hallo ZuquetuPlexis,
für Gebäudeeingänge verwenden wir typischerweise 'entrance=*' und nicht gate. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10210973270/history
Dass man nicht mit Pferden in die Rettungsstelle reitet, ist eigentlich selbstverständlich, daher muss man es nicht tagen. 
Für die Rettungsstelle gibt es dann noch den spezifischen 
emergency=emergency_ward_entrance
viele grüsse
ZuquetuPlexis (2023-05-16 15:59:59+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise👍️
Violaine_Do (2023-01-09 23:59:55+00:00): Iaorana et mauruuru pour tes contributions. Petit conseil, on ne rajoute pas de "made by" au nom. Ta contribution se retrouve en regardant qui a contribuer.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129259869
DressyPear4 (2022-11-23 15:12:55+00:00): Olá, não crie edições fictíceas
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129259896
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 06:00:00+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164880087
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 02:43:21+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164748511
user_115918 (2022-12-04 17:33:04+00:00): Looks like brandywine place was accidentally pulled in this change. I realigned it.
Helium314 (2023-02-06 10:40:46+00:00): Woher hast du die Information dass es die Durfahrt nicht gibt?
Helium314 (2023-03-14 11:44:09+00:00): ich hab die Durchfahrt wiederhergestellt, bitte lass solchen Blödsinn in Zukunft.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 02:43:22+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164748511
NieWnen (2022-11-24 12:40:46+00:00): To może już bez tego landuse=grass?
NorthCrab (2022-11-24 18:25:45+00:00): Można ale mi jest obojętne :) Więc jeśli tak czujesz to zmień.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-23 03:36:35+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJCZWdpbl9Qb2ludCI6WzAsMzQ4LjQ4OF19&location=34.116151%2C-84.010643%2C16.10&style=ROUTE_NAME
4b3eff (2023-05-09 01:17:46+00:00): Is this the same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14205621 ?
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 06:55:01+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164842492
ikopanjirukmana (2022-12-05 08:52:18+00:00): Hi!
Toni100 (2022-12-23 06:34:47+00:00): Moikka! "foot=no" tagia tulisi käyttää jos kävely on erikseen kielletty liikennemerkein. Tässä tapauksessa voi käyttää tagia "foot=use_sidepath" . Kävin nyt perumassa muutoksen! https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130403723
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129262764
KevinOs (2022-11-23 06:21:47+00:00): right on, glad someone else is using the open data off COE, there is a ton of stuff on there to help.
MxxCon (2022-11-26 00:33:25+00:00): Hello.
If you want to add a country to the address, it should be done as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
"country=" is an invalid tag.
However, due to the nature of OSM's database and inheritance properties of objects, explicitly specifying a country really unnecessary since it's trivial to see that this node is located within the perimeter of US.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129263082
tastrax (2022-11-26 04:29:39+00:00): Hi Folks - is the "Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority nomenclature for building names" open data? If its not open data then its likely we cant use the database/document as a source for place names.
Jan Olieslagers (2022-11-23 10:17:45+00:00): This modification confuses me, and it is not correct. We now have all the aeronautical information twice, once in way 608674696 and then again in relation 14923843. We have however a strong p[rinciple that every "featture" on the ground should be one and exactly one time in our database. Please correct. Or can you explain what you tried to achieve?
B_KSL (2022-11-24 03:58:06+00:00): I've corrected broken multipolygon, doubled fences and overlooked all the remaining tags on the one outer line (608674696) of the new multipolygon. 
I've already removed them - should be ok now.
Jan Olieslagers (2022-11-24 16:36:04+00:00): Many thanks, it looks much better now! Regards from Portugal!
Karel
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-23 05:28:26+00:00): These rails all go through bedrooms and/or roads where there are clearly no rails going across the pavement.

These rails do NOT exist and thus should not be mapped.
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-23 05:40:24+00:00): These rails go through houses and across roads.  It is clear they do not exist.  In addition, local survey in several areas confirm that they have been replaced by trails and do not in fact exist as an abandoned or razed railway as there is NO trace of what potentially existed at some point in time.

These features should be moved to OHM instead.
ikopanjirukmana (2022-12-05 12:42:46+00:00): Modified Tag
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 06:25:18+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164841827
infeeeee (2022-11-23 13:44:58+00:00): Szia!
A Forrás/Source mezőt a beküldéskor töltsd ki légyszíves, ha ismerős vagy a környéken, és nem konkrét felméréssel készült, akkor használhatod a 'local knowledge' választ. Ha légifelvétel alapján rajzolsz, akkor azt, hogy melyiket nézed. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
Köszi! További jó térképezést!
habi (2022-11-23 11:32:28+00:00): Ciao BERNEXPO Team

Schön macht ihr hier in OpenStreetMap mit und pflegt die Daten in eurer Nähe!

Mit dieser Änderung habt ihr dem Defibrillator ein `access=permit` hinzugefügt, d.h. eine Bewilligungspflicht (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Dpermit).
Ist das wirklich so, oder ist der Defi an sich frei zugänglich, wenn mensch im Gebäude ist?

Ä Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
BERNEXPO AG (2022-11-24 05:59:49+00:00): Hey Habi
Cool von dir zu hören, hoffe es geht dir gut! 
Ja, bin per Zufall darauf gestossen und jemand Fremdes hat den Defi nicht ganz korrekt erfasst. 
Grundsätzlich freizugänglich, wenn die Person sich im Gebäude befindet. Dann passe ich diesen Punkt noch an. 
Häbs guet u lG Céline
Владимир К (2023-01-24 00:34:45+00:00): Добрый день!
А зачем Акаева сделали двухвейным? По панорамам там по одной полосе в каждую сторону
https://yandex.com/maps/-/CCUzNNTiPA
Гусейнова то же самое
emersonveenstra (2022-11-23 14:37:33+00:00): hi,

This import added two tags to each node, see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10211358343. the tags aren't relevant, they all have the same value, would you mind removing those? thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
MxxCon (2022-11-26 00:42:23+00:00): Hello.
Please stop with keyword stuffing into POI names. All that information is already recorded in appropriate tags.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129266347
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-26 07:33:10+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129268043
emersonveenstra (2022-11-23 14:38:14+00:00): Hi,

Same thing with the node tags here. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129266713
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:10:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Bexhill-OSM (2022-11-23 13:09:50+00:00): Pretty sure there's no tap here, nor would you want to drink it!
pitscheplatsch (2022-11-26 07:33:20+00:00): partly revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129266534
eggie (2022-11-23 08:22:59+00:00): Dag Michael

Top... 
Het best kun je alleen bijtaggen op de adresnode.. Dus geen adres- en bedrijfsinfo op de gebouw omtrek.
Het staat er nu ook allemaal dubbel in.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-23 08:37:48+00:00): Dubbele vermeldingen verwijderd..
eggie (2022-11-23 08:26:43+00:00): Dag Michael ..
Bedankt voor je bijdrage .. het is weer actueel.  
 Je hoeft geen access=yes toe te voegen.. Dat is altijd default.
Wellicht ook sports_centre  sport=.....  ?
swimming_pool wordt gebruikt bij de bak met water. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-23 08:43:42+00:00): Even aangepast naar sports_centre

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre

MVG
eggie
sipka (2022-11-26 06:59:08+00:00): Ahoj Rasťo, vidím že intenzívne mapuješ čo je chváli hodné ale všetko má svoje hranice a pravidlá. Moje výhrady smerujú k pridávania nových vrcholov a pomenovanie ich nezmyselnými menami a ešte k tomu z nepovolených zdrojov. 
Ak si stojíš za svojimi činmi tak ich pokús obhájiť na maperskom fóre kde som na to vytvoril diskusiu. 
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/mXlJTkcfEK0

S pozdravom Ivan Šípka.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-11-23 08:23:12+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?filters=eyJCZWdpbl9Qb2ludCI6WzAsMzQ4LjQ4OF19&location=40.306681%2C-74.091584%2C16.63&style=ROUTE_NAME
marczoutendijk (2022-11-23 08:46:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
marczoutendijk (2022-11-23 08:46:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
marczoutendijk (2022-11-23 08:45:38+00:00): What did you fix at this point?
Co naprawiłeś w tym momencie?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2022-11-23 08:46:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian
IlBano (2022-11-27 09:39:00+00:00): Ciao,

in questo changeset la way www.openstreetmap.org/way/369367209 è diventata un percorso chiuso in sovrapposizione con la corsia dell'autostrada.
Puoi verificare ?

Grazie

IlBano
luschi (2023-02-22 18:23:39+00:00): Hi Pucciotrex30,     
I have reverted your edits from this changeset, because after your edits the turn lanes(way/369367209) was no longer correct and was deleted from some other user.      
Pay attention when moving motorway junctions, because moving the point to the end of the line is not the mapping system we use.

Turn lanes are the most recent system for mapping motorway junctions!

regards     
luschi
DressyPear4 (2022-11-23 15:55:30+00:00): Olá, evite adicionar linhas por cima das vias, aqui está o uso para cabos de fibra
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:communication%3Dline
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129270305
Dodko (2025-11-17 10:42:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110439129/history
k čomu je dobrá vymazávať z budovy source:addr a ref:minvskaddress?
MarcoR (2022-11-25 23:10:04+00:00): Ciao!
Finché non è presente l'indirizzo è impossibile geolocalizzare un luogo che si trova  a quell'indirizzo; la buona notizia è che grazie a te, adesso "Via Caioli 36" può essere cercato :)

Ho sistemato il nome e il formato del telefono del ristorante; se conosci con più precisione l'orario di apertura sarebbe meglio indicarlo perché ora come ora è impostato su 24/7 che significa che non chiude *mai*.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
nevw (2022-11-23 10:13:57+00:00): Hi, you have added a bridge tag to a long stretch of road. Instead, you need to split the road at each end of the bridge and add the bridge tag only to the section of the road that goes over the bridge.
nevw (2022-11-27 16:11:21+00:00): No response, bridge deleted , oneway=no not needed as implied to all roads unless otherwise tagged
Adikso (2022-11-23 09:30:23+00:00): Wycofałem zmiany (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129272286)
Coś nie tak jest z tymi zmianami, te budynki na pewno nie pływają na wodzie :)
gurglypipe (2022-11-23 12:37:41+00:00): Hiya, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap.

You’ve changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527563341 so it goes down to the beach, but the public footpath data from the council shows it as going to the middle of Simonscales Wood. Is there no footpath on the ground which goes to Simonscales Wood?

You can see the council footpath data by selecting the ‘Public Rights of Way’ overlay in the ‘Background Settings’ panel on the right in the editor.

Thanks!
adventuringwithmike (2022-11-23 12:55:45+00:00): Hello Gurglypipe, 

Unfortunately the River Cocker has eroded its northern bank in that area and taken the path with it.
gurglypipe (2022-11-23 13:02:05+00:00): Thanks for your fast reply!

In that case, I’ve re-added the path, but marked it as destroyed, in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129281766. Re-adding the line of the path will prevent others from erroneously re-adding it in future from the footpath data.

Happy editing :)
Suburbanno (2022-11-24 03:46:22+00:00): Olá, evite fazer exclusões desse tipo, quem fez gastou um enorme tempo fazendo o micro mapeamento, por mais que os polígonos são estejam exatamente idênticos com a realidade, devido a baixa qualidade de imagem e distorção, é uma edição válida. Excluir uma enorme quantidade de dados sem ao menos consultar a comunidade é complicado. A ideia é melhorar o mapa, adicionando dados e melhorando os dados existentes, não excluindo o que já está mapeado.
Matheus Barboza (2022-11-24 09:12:23+00:00): Olá. obrigado pela dica. Como devo consultar a comunidade nesses casos?
Raphaelkaart (2022-11-24 13:27:07+00:00): Bom dia!! 

Entra na Comunidade Brasileira no Telegram; https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade
user_5359 (2022-11-23 13:00:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please write more detailed change comments. I don't know what you tried to do, but you only managed to destroy the Nürberg-Ring for a short time. I have just taken back your changes.
aTarom (2023-02-22 09:02:45+00:00): Hola jeslop,
Me puedes orientar con esto? Parece que puede haber un error o en el BOE o en la AVL
https://www.avl.gva.es/web/publicacions/noms-dels-municipis-valencians
AVL
"la Torre d’en Besora"
BOE
"Torre d’en Besora"
¿Te has encontrado algún caso así?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/346719/history
Saludos
jeslop (2023-02-22 12:09:28+00:00): Hola aTarom.
Se me ocurre, por el enlace que adjuntas, que la fecha de actualización del listado de la Academia es anterior a la publicación del BOE (junio del 22, mientras que el BOE es de noviembre) y que de ahí venga todo el 'problema'. Quizás cuando la academia actualice el listado ya refleje el cambio, parece una cuestión de sincronización.

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group