piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
chillly (2017-04-06 15:09:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM
You have placed a point right over the top of a cafe (Cafe Nero) . Has this business replaced Cafe Nero? Is it sharing the building? 

The point you have added doesn't describe what it is. You have given lots of details, but no shop tag or office tag to describe what category the business is. The description is just free text. shop=yes would be a good start.
And Albert Fair Trading Ltd (2017-04-06 15:17:00+00:00): How do we make the point SHOP? This isn't clear at all. 
We are actually a shop on the upper tier of Chester's Rows ABOVE cafe Nero.
chillly (2017-04-06 15:22:41+00:00): I have added shop=yes tag. If there is a better shop description you can change it later. Now it has a shop tag it is easier to change it. 

Adding a shop above another is a problem. I suggest staggering the two points a little, maybe to reflect the relative entrances to the two premises. If your shop shows up in almost the right place people will find it when they arrive at the site. I haven't moved your shop point.
HTH
And Albert Fair Trading Ltd (2017-04-06 15:44:43+00:00): OK, Thank you.
I find this site awfully confusing to navigate and add the correct information. Well as long as people can find us that's all we want really. 
Thank s again
And Albert Fair Trading Ltd (2017-04-06 15:46:00+00:00): I can't see the tag point to change it?
trigpoint (2017-04-06 16:13:24+00:00): Hi, also spotted that you have used=ele=1, that means 1m above sealevel. The correct tag is layer=1, as already used on Eastgate Street North.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:51:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:43:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:19:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:01:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:58:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:49:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:04:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:59:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:28:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:41:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:43:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:47:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:24:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
BCNorwich (2017-04-06 16:40:56+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've taken the liberty of adjusting the address, correcting the postcode O to 0, changing the format of the opening hours to suit OSM convention, adding a website. Hope that helps Regards Bernard
mavl (2018-12-25 19:40:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
nammala (2017-04-07 06:15:29+00:00): Hi  katpatuka,

May I know the reason behind deleting `name:en` in the two features
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369497122
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369497632
katpatuka (2017-04-07 06:47:50+00:00): Hello nammala,
Sure - as you can see looking at the history of both nodes I've re-used two nodes which did have wrong place names:

* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369497122/history
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369497632/history

I've used the place names found both on http://www.cadviet.com/upfiles/3/hc_camau.jpg and GNS.
nammala (2017-04-07 06:51:09+00:00): Awesome thank you . By the way great job improving the map.

Regards,
nammala
katpatuka (2017-04-07 08:26:35+00:00): Thank you ;)
mavl (2018-12-25 19:18:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:19:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:12:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:33:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:49:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
sheldonelectric (2025-04-07 12:07:11+00:00): Hey there, as I haven't seen it on the street sign, I wanted to ask your source for the name:fr ; name:en
osm.org/way/245250248/history
ika-chan! (2025-04-07 14:43:34+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164638568
sheldonelectric (2025-04-08 11:24:59+00:00): από ερωτήσεις που κάνω σε ξένους, από που προκύπτουν τα ονόματα σε name:xx, άλλοι μου απάντησαν ότι τα εφήβραν, άλλοι ότι φταίει το app, άλλοι έχουν φάει μπλοκ και είναι ανενεργοί, κι άλλοι απλώς αγνόησαν το ερώτημά μου. Μέχρι τώρα δεν έχω λάβει κάποια απάντηση με source. Συνεχίζω να ρωτάω αλλά σε γενικές γραμμές τα name:xx πάνε για διαγραφή αν δεν βρίσκω source (wiki, website, κλπ)...
Σε κάποια POI που βρίσκω URL το βάζω σαν int_name
ika-chan! (2025-04-08 21:22:06+00:00): I already corrected the translation error for you, even though the names "Alexander the Great" and "Alexandre le Grand" are common human knowledge in the respective linguistic communities. I remain available at your disposal.
nikospag (2025-04-09 16:28:13+00:00): @DWG
I reported sheldonelectric last month because he was deleting foreign languages and you did nothing.
Now this user keeps deleting languages.
nikospag (2025-04-09 16:51:18+00:00): @ika-chan!
You should report him too.
sheldonelectric (2025-04-10 11:26:03+00:00): I have asked a lot of foreign contributors about the languages they added, and absolutely none of them provided a source.

@DWG I have reported nikospag last month because he added 26500 wrong names for his (wrongly set) consumer to work better.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:31:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Peilscheibe (2017-04-08 09:24:15+00:00): Hallo helme47,
Du hast hier an den eingefügten place-nodes als Quelle "map LGRB-BW" angegeben - gibt es denn dafür eine explizite Nutzungsfreigabe für OSM?
helmle47 (2017-04-09 11:38:35+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe,
das LGRB-BW ist eine Landesbehörde und stellt seine Karten zur freien Verfügung.
In seiner AGB unter 6.4 "Nutzungsrecht für Inhalte der Webseiten" bekommt der Nutzer ohne Rückfragen ein Nutzungsrecht nach § 31 Abs. 2. Es muss aber auf die Datenquelle hingewiesen werden.
Ich bin kein Jurist und kann deshalb nicht beurteilen, ob dies für die Benutzung in OSM so in Ordnung geht.
Hier noch den Link zur AGB.
https://produkte.lgrb-bw.de/agb/
Peilscheibe (2017-04-09 13:01:42+00:00): Hallo helmle47,
nun, wenn man den Absatz in den AGB zu Ende liest, steht dort: "Auf Produkten des Erwerbers, die dieser unter Verwendung der erhaltenen Daten erarbeitet hat, ist auf die Datenquelle hinzuweisen und an sichtbarer Stelle ein Copyright-Vermerk anzubringen". Genau das kann OSM nicht gewährleisten, daher wird ja regelmäßig nach einer expliziten Freigabe verlangt. 
Ob Du Jurist bist oder nicht, spielt insofern keine Rolle, als dass es immer Deine eigene Verantwortung ist, nur lizenzkompatible Daten einzubringen um das Projekt nicht zu beschädigen und Dich nicht dem Vorwurf einer Urheberrechtsverletzung auszusetzen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright
http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Contributor_Terms
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Potential_Datasources
helmle47 (2017-04-10 16:50:04+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe,
danke für diese Hinweise.
Wenn man also nicht 100% weiß, ob es eine Nutzungsfreigabe für OSM gibt, sollte man auf eine Quellangabe verzichten. Dies werde ich wohl in der Zukunft so machen.
Peilscheibe (2017-04-10 19:58:48+00:00): Nein. Man sollte grundsätzlich darauf verzichten, Daten einzutragen, die nicht frei von Rechten Dritter sind - das diskreditiert das ganze Projekt. OSM hat zum Ziel, einen _freien_ Geodatensatz zusammenzutragen - dem hat ja auch jeder, der hier mitmacht, explizit zugestimmt.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:07:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:30:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
trigpoint (2017-04-06 16:46:11+00:00): Hi, what is the source of this edit?
You have removed footpath L57 and the airport trail for example. L57 is a PROW and cannot simply be closed, it will at most have been diverted. Do you have any reference to this?
Arrow Cars UK (2017-04-06 17:29:39+00:00): Hi,
Sorry, I should have referenced such a significant change like this. All the site plans and access arrangements are available here:

http://www.eastmidlandsgateway.co.uk/community/phasing.php

The public right of way info is here:

https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/wp-content/ipc/uploads/projects/TR050002/TR050002-000700-5.2%20ES%20Appendix%2013.1_Appendix%20S%20NMU2%20Preliminary%20Design%20NMU%20Audit%20Rev%201.pdf

There will be many more edits over the next few years as paths are reopened/moved.

Luke
will_p (2017-04-06 21:55:02+00:00): Hi Luke,
I haven't looked what's happening on the ground here for a couple of months, but I'm a bit surprised that all these features have already been cleared. Have you actually confirmed that they have all gone? For example, you have removed a service road all the way from Church Street, Lockington to the airport perimeter - has this road really been obliterated along its entire length at this early stage in the development?  The general rule is that we map what exists on the ground now, not what is planned in future. If roads or paths are closed due to the development, you should tag them with access=no, rather than deleting them. 

The links to plans you posted above are useful for getting an overview of this development, but it is important to be clear that they are copyright and are not a suitable source for making changes to OSM.
Will
Arrow Cars UK (2017-04-07 08:34:26+00:00): Morning Will,
The features I've removed have all gone this week. The construction area I've added is the full area where ground work has started. (Obviously it's impossible to get GPS tracks at the moment as there is no access). 
The roads which are closed, such as the junction with Ashby Road and the A453, I have tagged with access=no and construction=yes.
I'll be heading to the airport later today, so will try and get some photos to show that it is indeed completely obliterated.
Luke
will_p (2017-04-08 21:38:45+00:00): Today I have had a look at the current situation. It turns out that many of the deleted features do still exist:
The Airport Trail is still there and is still open to the public with minor diversions.
The service road from Church Lane (Lockington) is still there. It's being used as one of the main access roads into the construction site.
The airport viewing area is still there. I think this is just outside the planned development and will probably remain.
The roughly square shaped area of woodland on the north of the current construction area is still intact.

I have undeleted these features. 

The public footpath Trigpoint mentioned above has completely gone. It will presumably get reinstated in some form later on.

I have retagged the recently added roads and buildings because there is no sign of them yet on the ground, not even foundations.

I don't doubt you have acted in good faith here. It is easy to get carried away when mapping large scale developments like this, but please check carefully before deleting lots of stuff.
datendelphin (2017-04-06 18:56:14+00:00): You need to make two rings to map these two clearings. I fixed it for you.
DD1GJ (2017-04-06 19:42:44+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 (vermutlich am Wochenende) verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
exploide (2017-04-07 09:39:07+00:00): Alles klar. Das ist ja unschön, dass die App in so fern zu Problemen führt. Fand den Gedanken eigentlich gut über eine (gamification) App zum Datensatz der OSM beitragen zu können ohne sich mit den aufwändigen Details des Mappens beschäftigen zu müssen.
Ich hoffe diese App (und auch andere Apps wenn ich mir den Foren-Thread so ansehe) bekommen das in absehbarer Zeit besser hin. Denn ich sehe schon Vorteile darin, gewisse nützliche Informationen (Straßennamen, Hausnummern, ...) von denen etwa das Navigieren mit OSM verbessert werden kann, nicht nur von "Profi"-Mappern eintragen zu lassen, sondern eben von der Masse, die zwar da ist, aber ggf. (noch) nicht eingearbeitet ist.
carciofo (2017-07-06 16:08:48+00:00): Hi there, could you please review your changes in this area? The roads you added already existed and now they are all overlapping existing feature (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/126173422). Thanks in advance.
carciofo (2017-07-27 07:13:46+00:00): I've removed the duplicate roads. Make sure to check for existing features when uploading tracks :) Thanks & happy mapping!
gscholz (2018-01-22 21:16:53+00:00): 
Sorry for the late reply, but I just found your comments. I did not add the complained streets, see here:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47513597

Instead I changed an overlapping building/street segment.
Kind regards
Guido
SimonPoole (2018-02-21 09:05:04+00:00): Bitte nicht Strassennamen in der Schweiz verschlimmbessern siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/56542719 (mal abgesehen davon das der NRW-Atlas da wohl auch keine Abdeckung hat).
Vladislav D (2017-04-09 23:54:09+00:00): ЛЭП там снесли уже как два месяца, я из убрал, они снова тут:)
BushmanK (2017-04-10 00:18:32+00:00): Всю целиком или только часть?
Vladislav D (2017-04-10 00:20:26+00:00): Частями. Я поправил сейчас. Там получается некоторые стоят без проводов (в гаражах) - я даже не знаю как их сносить будут, мб разбор. А некоторые что в сквере на Молодцова - валяются месяца 2, пока не убрали. В ближайшее время буду там, посмотрю, обновлю.
Короче говоря, спрятали под землю, видимо в ближайшие месяцы ничего не останется вовсе.
BushmanK (2017-04-10 01:31:46+00:00): Понятно. Вероятно, на те опоры, которые остаются, но не используются, нужно поставить disused=yes, чтобы было понятно.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Mike Baggaley (2017-04-07 13:40:09+00:00): Hi Olney Footpath 9 is not a suitable name for a path or road. Please use loc_ref or prow_ref for path numbers.

Thanks,
Mike
DD1GJ (2017-04-06 19:42:28+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Die von Dir verwendete App StreetComplete 0.5 speichert leider suboptimal und macht dadurch im Hintergrund viele Qualitätssicherungstools der Community ziemlich unbrauchbar. Leg daher bitte eine Pause bei Deinen Edits ein, bis die Version 0.6 (vermutlich am Wochenende) verfügbar ist. Die Hintergründe und weitere Informationen findest Du unter

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57855

Wie OpenStreetMap funktioniert, kannst Du z.B. hier nachlesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Vielen Dank für Dein Verständnis.
trigpoint (2017-04-06 17:00:48+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. The correct way to tag a field where sheep graze is landuse=farmland, although farmland is normally left blank.
For some reason you have made a mistake and tagged it as water, wont the sheep drown?
wir3d123 (2017-04-06 17:24:52+00:00): Appreciate the advice. New to this as you can probably tell... I think i have corrected this now. Please tell me if i need to change it again.
chillly (2017-04-06 17:06:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM

You have placed a park on top of an existing recreation ground. Not everything that is green is a park. How would you like to sort this out?
wir3d123 (2017-04-06 17:20:53+00:00): Seen as though a park is literally defined as an area of land used for recreation i am a little confused as why you felt the need to attempt to belittle me? If you could actually tell me a definition of a park that exclusively rejects the fact that they are areas of public land that are for recreation then i will gladly update my edit.
chillly (2017-04-06 17:29:34+00:00): reverted
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-07-05 20:28:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50067857 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Turkey - attempts by various people to contact the user have failed.
eggie (2017-04-06 17:45:57+00:00): Nu is het goed. Het zat nog op één plekje vast aan de landuse precies op de splitsing.
Je kunt beter zo snel mogelijk overstappen op editor JOSM. Die heeft een validator en die waarschuwt bij uploaden.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:JOSM/Guide
Michel de Jongh is de lokale mapper. Die is ook al een tijdje bezig. Veel edits zijn van hem. Je kunt hem berichten als je iets ingrijpend wil veranderen.
Wanneer je vragen hebt kun je gerust reageren.
eggie (2017-04-06 17:56:31+00:00): Wat ik doe is zo'n knoop beetpakken met de linker muisknop en als dan de landuse meekomt zit de weg vastgeplakt. In JOSM maakt ik 'm los met de G-toets. In ID weet ik het niet. Delete wil ook wel eens helpen. Knopen plakken doe ik met de M-toets. Escape in JOSM is de S-toets.