piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
redd (2022-09-04 11:00:18+00:00): Hi Mat_Ei,
vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag und damit herzlich Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Der name= soll stets dem tatsächlichen Namen bzw. dem offiziellen Namen vorbehalten sein.
Daher habe ich die von dir erfasste Inschrift in den dafür vorgesehenen Wert insciription= geändert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9672004536.
Schöne Grüsse,
redd
GinaroZ (2022-08-04 21:56:38+00:00): I think these would probably be better tagged as parking=layby? e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6304638643/history
FlawOfAverages (2022-08-08 21:13:33+00:00): Hi there, yes that seem to make the most sense. I tagged them when going past with StreetComplete and layby unfortunately wasn't an option on there. I'll not tag them when going past again.
MxxCon (2022-04-18 06:59:05+00:00): Hello.
Does this restaurant occupy the whole building or just the ground floor and above it is a residential/office building?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119818729
yeetbeep (2022-04-23 18:28:52+00:00): The restaurant only occupies the ground floor.
MxxCon (2022-04-24 02:18:40+00:00): In that case you shouldn't have tagged the whole building as that restaurant, but instead created a new node with restaurant's info and positioned it inside of the building's perimeter, preferably closer to the main entrance.
Only if a business occupies the whole building is it appropriate to tag the way you did here. For example a standalone McDonalds or a standalone Costco can be tagged on the building.
I'll go ahead and correct this one. 🙂
If you have any questions, feel free to ask. 👍
kerby418 (2022-04-17 14:36:38+00:00): Sorry this is an error changeset
abakus_uploader (2022-04-17 23:46:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
bxl-forever (2022-04-17 15:02:17+00:00): Hello,
Belgieplein or Belgiëplein?
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:16:02+00:00): I think it is Belgieplein so it is on urbiris
SekeRob (2022-05-05 14:13:50+00:00): Hi,

What is this *featureless* double line overlaying itself and denoted as object https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350991058 generating a change set warning "warnings:suspicious_name:generic_name". There's only a CLC explanation with a wiki link, the same link as the line below as part of the area relations. The line is linked to a farmland relation except there's no farmland, only a landfill on the left and a residential area on the right. Let me know please.

Ciao.
Luzandro (2022-08-25 05:12:03+00:00): Hallo,

kannst du dir bitte diesen Hinweis ansehen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3277795

Das Fahren gegen die Einbahn hattest du mit diesem CS schon eingetragen, aber ich weiß nicht, ob das jetzt wirklich auch schon eine Fahrradstraße ist.
evod (2022-08-25 08:07:41+00:00): Ich weiß zwar, dass das eine Fahrradstraße werden soll, damals war sie aber noch nicht beschildert. Und ich komm dort leider auch sehr selten vorbei, kann also jetzt nicht nachschauen.
vmicho (2022-04-18 12:39:01+00:00): Hi. Can you describe more your edits?
redd (2022-08-11 22:57:00+00:00): Hi gominu,
danke fuer deine Beitraege zu OpenStreetMap!
Ich glaube der watermill fehlt das doppelte l in deiner Erfassung building=watermil, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9672133820
Koenntest du das bitte nochmal pruefen?
vielen Dank! 
redd
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:29:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Streetview247 (2022-04-17 16:21:44+00:00): Bitte diesen Kommentar ignorieren da die AutoKorrektur mir diesen Text einfach übernommen  hat. Der zweite Änderungsansatz ist der richtige Text
Kovoschiz (2022-04-18 07:55:18+00:00): Would be very bad if a new acc is opened to do this.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-18 07:55:50+00:00): Not to mention the changeset comment.
HKHikerhang (2022-04-18 16:34:16+00:00): CHProtection, your edit war would be useless. We are keeping watching you (or this place/path) everyday and your changes would be change back immediately.
Arnaud Champollion (2022-05-17 19:44:36+00:00): Bonjour,
Si le chemin 1000323175 a disparu, il vaut mieux le supprimer je pense.
Sinon, déjà supprimer le "name"="disparu" (name est réservé au nom propre de l'objet), et peut-être supprimer le tag highway puisqu'il y a déjà un disused:highway qui le décrit très bien :)
JJ46 (2022-05-18 04:54:23+00:00): Dans ce cas, je préfère le supprimer, c'est toujours très désagréable de prévoir un itinéraire et de s'apercevoir, au final, que le chemin qui n'existe plus... 
Merci pour ce commentaire.
Arnaud Champollion (2022-05-18 05:01:33+00:00): Exactement.
Tu peux le supprimer, ou juste laisser ce seul attribut :
was:highway=path
ce qui le fera disparaître du point de vue carte, mais conservera l'historique dans la base de données si un jour un contributeur ce demande ce qu'il est devenu pour une raison ou une autre.
JJ46 (2022-05-18 07:48:59+00:00): Intéressant pour une prochaine fois (vu que j'ai déjà supprimé ce bout de chemin). Je tombe régulièrement sur des chemins qui disparaissent ou qui ne sont plus praticables que pour les lapins ou les sangliers. Je mettrai donc cet attribut dorénavant.
Merci beaucoup.
Bruno
tuttiton (2022-04-17 20:42:51+00:00): Sorry for the giant change set box, the reason is:
I updated tags of Flint Subdivision railroad with iD suggestion (checked that its actually operated by Canadian National Railway before doing that), didn't though it'll be this big
Sanniu (2022-04-18 04:24:18+00:00): Please don't! This is building and you keep removing building=yes tag! I know ID is hard to master, but still...
Patr1k_P (2022-04-19 15:15:00+00:00): podla coho je ten nazov?
Jose Riha (2022-07-25 07:25:54+00:00): tak tak. do "name" nepatria vseobecne nazvy. urcite nie je cielom mat v mape obchod s nazvom "Obchod", cestu s nazvom "Cesta" a pod. do name patria vlastne mena, teda idealne nieco, co niekto schvalil alebo existuje (aspon polooficialna) tabulka
Scout Jens (2022-05-05 13:22:52+00:00): die Treppe dort bei der Horbachquelle bin ich schon gegangen - eine temporäre Sperrung einzutragen halte ich nicht für sinnvoll
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2022-05-05 14:51:33+00:00): Ich habe den ersten querliegenden Baum am unteren Ende für eine Pinkelpause genutzt und hatte von daher einen guten längeren Blick ;-) auf den Weg dahinter und da liegt offenbar mehr Mikado als nur der erste Baum ... Und das sperrende Schild sah stabiler aus, Von daher fürchte ich, dass das so temporär gar nicht ist ... Deswegen habe ich es auch eingetragen.
Scout Jens (2022-05-06 06:54:46+00:00): Danke für Deine Antwort. Dann ist es wohl so. Schade um diese Verbindung. Grüße, Jens
Wynwood (2022-04-27 03:08:27+00:00): Hi Apay00, I have found your recent edits near Tanjung Uban port where you have changed the highway classification from service to platform. Based on OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dplatform) a platform is a "raised structure along the side of a road.” Instead, I feel it is more appropriate if you use the public_transport=platform tag for the pier, which gives the facility to ferry route. Let me know if you agree, and if so I’d like to update those ways back to service roads. Also, I noticed t a few untagged ways (way 1052461852, way 1052461851, way 1052461850, way 1052461849) in this changeset, which are potentially storage tanks (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=storage_tank). Let me know what you think, Happy Mapping!
HirschKauz (2022-04-20 19:10:00+00:00): Hi tg4567 
magst Du bitte dran denken Telefon/Fax/Mobil -nummern immer im internationalen Format zu taggen? also +49 123456789 (ohne dei 0/Null) 
Viele Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119824630
fullsailor (2022-05-17 17:45:36+00:00): Hi Manny, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There is a specific format for opening_hours values which helps machines read the tag. The value for this building would be "Mo-Th 09:00-16:00; Fr 09:00-12:00". The format is defined in the wiki [https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours]
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119824999
1998alexkane (2022-04-18 00:38:52+00:00): I believe some of your modifications to the path types are incorrect (for example some of the paths around the hoyt park pool are definitly not cycleways)
BPTT (2022-04-18 00:51:39+00:00): Feel free to change or revert any that you believe are inaccurate. I base my edits to path types around path width (shared multiuse paths are usually 8-10' wide), path material (almost always paved asphalt), and personal experience (seeing many people commonly riding bikes there). Regarding Hoyt Park specifically, it is the trailhead for the OLT Menomonee Line (at the bridge) and the Hoyt Park MTB Trail, which surrounds the pool at the park's perimeter. https://www.mtbproject.com/trail/62201/hoyt-park I would argue the changes I made to paths in Hoyt Park are correct as Cycle & Foot Paths because they and the park connect the former two trails with the OLT Root River Line - but it may be true that I inaccurately and mistakenly tagged them (the Hoyt Park paths specifically) as part of the OLT Meno Line when they in fact are not.
1998alexkane (2022-04-18 01:40:30+00:00): Personally I am quite cautious about tagging pathways as bicycle=yes/designated specifically within parks since cycling on park footpaths in the parks is technically illegal except on areas designated for cycling (of course we don't map legislation, but access restrictions should be legal :))

As for the OLT route relations, ideally there should be a correspondence with the waymarking signs on the trail, I believe the signs around there indicate that the two routes intersect at the intersection of Menomonee River Pkwy and Swan Blvd
jpennycook (2022-04-17 17:46:05+00:00): Thanks!
Frans S (2022-05-04 14:20:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
I reviewed a number of your changesets, and they all are of the same poor quality.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention to following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings, not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119826200
highflyer74 (2022-04-19 09:33:53+00:00): Hi! There seems to be an error in this relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13524509) as there are both a way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130573661) and a building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052487892) included.

Also, according my understanding, there is no need to add a relation to map a peninsula (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dpeninsula).

Are you in contact with the danish community?

All the best from Bremen!
DKTrail (2022-05-26 18:22:27+00:00): Thanks for letting me know :) I've tried with a more simple edit and have submitted that.
larsalonian (2022-04-18 07:45:54+00:00): Remember to orthogonalise buildings. The shortcut in iD editor is Q, and in JOSM is S.
Alexey Vazhnov (2022-04-17 18:11:24+00:00): source = survey.
4004 (2023-09-01 12:22:48+00:00): наврали вы с номерами подьездов, там 7 и 8
BCNorwich (2022-04-18 06:16:45+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder how anyone would get to this parking spot as there's no path or track to it? Please take note that only genuine verifiable features should be added to the OSM database. Do you need help removing the POI?

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2022-04-24 18:22:13+00:00): No response so removed.
bxl-forever (2022-04-17 18:51:18+00:00): Added, thanks
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9672650541
bxl-forever (2022-04-17 18:51:58+00:00): (Sorry, not meant to be a comment on this changeset, this was the reply to a note.)
bxl-forever (2022-04-17 19:29:16+00:00): Hello,

Do you know the name of that restaurant you’ve just added to the map?

There is a new bar here, which was surveyed and recently added; I want to make sure you didn't create a duplicate.

Thanks.
Frans S (2022-04-19 13:17:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119828283
Patrick Lehner (2022-04-18 16:04:17+00:00): Hi AJWelsbie, thanks for contributing to OSM and HOT!
I noticed that you added a lot of building shapes that don't really match the satellite imagery. The building shapes should be square, and separate buildings should be recorded separately. Please try to be more careful and precise :)
vladosaro (2025-09-16 18:54:07+00:00): naozaj je tam vstup do jaskyne? Lebo ja som našiel iba toto:
https://backend.freemap.sk/gallery/pictures/341065/image?width=1110&authToken=06deYs%2BrKqPaFkFTEccmZKaPekKDmZO3VmvGdcTsHe4%3D
menganito (2025-09-17 08:00:36+00:00): Je tam jedno aj druhé, jaskyňa je o kus východnejšie ako okno, možno pár desiatok metrov. Presne si to už nepamätám. 
https://backend.freemap.sk/gallery/pictures/684803/image?width=1110&authToken=fd%2BRewQeuRkCOMrmnrMe%2FqW%2BmbxKKdjSipFwWMlpmZ4%3D
Frans S (2022-04-20 10:52:00+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key, You did not square a single building. Another point: Buildings needs to be tagged as Building=Yes.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119828806
Mordechai23 (2022-04-18 12:29:00+00:00): Cześć, fajnie że tyle rysujesz w Bielawie, wygląda to naprawdę super, ale wiele rzeczy otagowałeś niepoprawnie i to trzeba poprawić

1. Kiedy rysujesz obszar natural=wood jak tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046253102, to nie należy dodawać na nim drzew. albo rysujesz obszar wood, albo landuse=village_green i na nim punkty drzew.

2. Bramka lub furtka w płocie taka jak tu https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9641365701 to barrier=gate, entrance=yes zarezerwowane jest dla wejść do budynków

3. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049107439 podjazdy na posesję powinny mieć jeszcze tag service=driveway

4. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1033924377 leisure=outdoor_seating to ogródek piwny w restauracji, nie czyjś ogródek na posesji.

5.https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1040908688 zatoka autobusowa to nie public_transport=platform. Ten tag służy to oznaczania "peronu" czyli miejsca, gdzie się czeka na tramwaj, autobus czy pociąg

6. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322176041 name=* nie służy do dodawania opisów obiektów. Patrz na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw.C4.85

7. Zestawy zmian muszą mieć opisy, a nie losowe znaki jak wypisujesz teraz. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian

Jeszcze mógłbym długo wymieniać, generalnie dobrze by było jakbyś przed korzystaniem z jakiegoś tagu patrzył na wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Main_Page i sprawdzał do czego dany tag służy, bo używanie szablonów ID jest bardzo mylące. 

Jeśli miałbyś jakieś pytania, to najlepiej wejdź na discorda polskiej społeczności, mógłbym ci wytłumaczyć tagowanie dogłębnie w wolnym czasie https://discord.gg/T4hhFNAk
;)
Coolawik (2022-04-19 11:07:34+00:00): naprawione! reszta na dsc
Mordechai23 (2022-04-18 07:58:02+00:00): it looks just about right to me
ivanbranco (2022-04-19 16:41:24+00:00): Ciao Niko, benvenuto su OSM :)

Per l'orario si usa un solo tag, e c'è una sintassi da seguire, in questo casa sarebbe opening_hours=Oct 01-Mar 31 08:00-17:00; Apr 01-Sep 31 Mo-Su 08:00-19:00
puoi trovare le varie regole qua: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:opening_hours
o usare questo tool se preferisci: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

nel precedente changeset avevi taggato un parcheggio parking=street_side come parking_surface, ho corretto anche quello

se hai domande chiedi pure, buon mapping :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119828958
crosstato (2022-04-18 07:51:07+00:00): Oops, wrong changeset comment. Correct comment: Added nail salon, updated restaurant tags
bxl-forever (2022-04-17 21:57:30+00:00): Hello,

It’s a good idea to push the Upload button in StreetComplete at the end of your survey.  Do that before you move to another area.

Otherwise, your changes from the first survey are still stored on the phone and uploaded together with changes taken in your other survey, a few hundred kilometers away.

Cheers.
user_5359 (2022-04-18 17:21:24+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir nochmal http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3677665196 an. Was ist die Bedeutung des Tags
Bootsverleih Heidehafen = down
?
Protoxenus (2022-04-18 17:28:31+00:00): Danke für den Tipp, dass ich da Unsinn geschrieben habe. Das passiert, wenn man unkonzentriert ist, JOSM benutzt und ein schon vorhandenes tag ändern will. Manchmal springt bei JOSM der Cursor in die erste Zeile, manchmal in die Zweite. Ich habe noch nicht herausgefunden, warum. Wenn man dann nicht genau hinsieht, überschreibt man das tag und nicht den Wert. Ich werde mich bemühen, besser aufzupassen.
SomeoneElse (2022-04-17 20:30:00+00:00): Coulton, from survey 10/4/2022, tr8728a
jeslop (2022-04-18 15:17:37+00:00): Hi BigKev97. Can you explain why you have changed the marketplace tag to town? And why the name is the same in ru and uk?
Regards
Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
mariotomo (2022-05-09 23:21:45+00:00): here I need to (sort of) come in defence of BigKev97.  his change is a partial bad revert of the mistake in changeset 113355896, where the place=city was changed to amenity=marketplace.
(Russian and Ukrainian are very very similar, I guess most places have the same name in those two languages.)
os-emmer (2024-02-28 18:56:50+00:00): Hi john paul jones & gringo,

you added 4 emergency=life_rings here. Why did you add amenity=emergency to that? The tag is undocumented and barly used. What information does it give?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9672832774
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9672832773
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9672832771
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9672832772
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2024-03-01 10:53:03+00:00): I guess I was following guidlines from a wiki tag 'how-to' If you feel this is wrong please change/delete as required. I honestly can't remember to be fair.
os-emmer (2024-03-01 15:59:54+00:00): Thanks for the response. I remooved the tag.
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2024-03-02 09:38:41+00:00): OK
Looking at it again, now I have a little more time.  It could be I placed the amenity tag in there so that it shows up on OSM, ClclOSM etc. Currently they are not showing on my OSM, ClclOSM, Cycle Map they don't even show up on Open Sea Map, which I would expect them to.