piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2019-07-21 06:47:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2018-07-20 15:51:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:28:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:57:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:37:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:50:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:44:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
maraf24 (2018-07-04 14:07:20+00:00): "mapping from Geoportal" to bardzo ogólny komentarz i w praktyce oznacza on brak komentarza.
Jesli chciałeś w ten sposób zaznaczyć, że korzystać ze zdjęć z geoportalu to jest to wiadomo z pola source=goeoportal.gov.pl
chandusekharreddy (2018-08-20 09:18:57+00:00): NH530B broekn, disconnected nodes from the highway
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
ejont (2019-02-17 20:15:32+00:00): Hello Halloween123!
You deleted a part of a road here (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378332907). I've restored it now. Do you use any scripts or add-ons so that can happen by accident? I only know that I would have to go out of my way to delete a random part of a road like this: first split it, confirm which part should retain the history, then select one part, then unselect the nodes (because the nodes were still there) and then hit delete.
mavl (2018-07-20 15:41:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:20:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:48:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:37:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:23:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Milad s (2018-07-04 12:29:31+00:00): Ok
Milad s (2018-07-04 12:29:44+00:00): Yes
mavl (2018-07-20 13:58:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:27:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:42:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
chandusekharreddy (2018-08-01 12:06:47+00:00): MDR102W broken
Halloween123 (2018-08-14 13:01:15+00:00): Hi,
Halloween123 (2018-08-14 13:04:15+00:00): I have connected the isolated nodes now. I had connected all the nodes earlier, But i am unaware of the reason why it happened.
mavl (2018-07-20 13:56:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2019-07-23 21:02:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 72564652, 72570564, 72574884 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: damage, copyrighted source].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:57:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Jose Luis Infante (2018-07-04 17:50:59+00:00): Hola,
has creado la vía sin ninguna etiqueta que indique que es una vía ciclista. Aparte la has unido al carrer de les Camèlies, cuando se supone que debe transcurrir en paralelo a la calle, sin compartir nodos.
Lo mejor es borrar esa vía y dibujar una vía nueva, en paralelo a la calle, con las etiquetas adecuadas.
Un saludo!
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:39:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
user_5359 (2018-07-08 05:43:45+00:00): Hello! Short question: What Did you mean with the keys Bochum-Dahlhausen and Freiwillige?
---
Hallo! Kurze Frage: Was meinst Du mit den beiden Schlüsseln Bochum-Dahlhausen und Freiwillige?
Mond00 (2018-07-08 17:11:46+00:00): Die beiden Schlüssel habe ich entfernt, war wohl ein Bedienungsfehler
mavl (2018-07-20 15:46:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Smiile Team (2018-07-04 12:58:08+00:00): oups, supprimé un chemin par erreur
viloan (2018-07-04 13:03:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pbnoxious (2018-07-04 21:25:31+00:00): Herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für die Änderung!

Allerdings war sie nicht ganz ideal: Eigentlich gibt es bereits einen Punkt in dem die Versicherung eingetragen ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/770108168 so dass nicht noch zusätzlich das Gebäude mit den Informationen versehen werden muss. Dieser erschien bislang nicht in der Standartkarte, da er nicht ganz "vollständig" war.

Ich habe die Informationen (und ein paar weitere von der Webseite) mal zu dem Punkt übertragen, weitere Ergänzungen aus erster Hand sind gerne gesehen!
user_5359 (2018-07-04 18:04:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way.
dikkeknodel (2018-07-13 08:54:42+00:00): Hi domob,
Nice detailing you did in the Sihlwald! I enjoy the level of detail, like you added the name to guidepost Besucherszentrum. I had seen that one in the past (last summer if I remember correctly), but it apparently slipped my mind to actually add it. I work a lot on the hiking and cycling route relations for mainly Switzerland, hence my interest.
Are you familiar with route relations and their implementation on waymarkedtrails.org? 
-----
I noticed you extended a track that is used in a hiking route relation from Sihlwald to Tannboden in this changeset and in 60580082:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33926816 
When extending a way all of its properties are also extended, so also the membership of a route relation.
The result can be viewed here: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=124455. The southeastern leg is the track you extended but which is actually not part of the route. To overcome this problem the track should be split where the route diverges.
-----
Im am well aware that it is easily missed, therefor I would like to share this knowledge with you. I suppose I still missed a few myself in the past. 
If you are interested in hiking routes as well, I can advice the JOSM drawing style 'OSMC hiking' which comfortably visualises the hiking routes with parallel coloured lines. But that still leaves the risk of accidentally changing other route relations, like cycle or bus, so caution remain necessary.
-----
I will correct this in the near future, just giving you some time to see what happened. Or if you wish you can off course correct it yourself.
-----
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,dikkeknodel
domob (2018-07-13 09:02:28+00:00): Thanks for getting in touch!  In general, yes, I'm aware of how relations work and that I have to split ways - so I probably just messed this one up.  Thanks for spotting and fixing!
dikkeknodel (2018-07-13 10:04:11+00:00): Thanks for getting back quickly, I've repaired it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60682306.
Cheers, dikkeknodel
viloan (2018-07-04 13:27:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Noé T (2018-07-04 13:42:12+00:00): Muito Obrigado :)
naoliv (2018-07-04 13:48:31+00:00): Bem vindo de volta, Grzmot.
joost schouppe (2018-11-16 21:24:49+00:00): Om straatnamen te zien kan je ook de achtergrondkaart veranderen naar het GRB. Heel af en toe zitten daar wel fouten in.
Het stukje weg dat je hebt bijgetekend, is dat niet gewoon een oprit?
Probeer ook wegen niet "vast te klikken" aan grenzen van weilanden etc, ondanks dat de editor dat nogal aanmoedigt. Weilanden klik je enkel vast aan andere vlakken, bijvoorbeeld woongebied. Ik heb hier die vlakken trouwens direct maar wat verbeterd, aangezien die niet mooi aansluitend getekend waren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/60409693
Hjart (2018-07-04 15:34:58+00:00): Undlad helst at flytte på stier mm på baggrund af et enkelt gps spor. Sandsynligheden for at lige dit gps spor er mere akkurat end de andre der er brugt her er ikke stor. Se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Accuracy_of_GPS_data#Factors_affecting_accuracy
atcomapper (2018-07-04 15:46:47+00:00): @Hjart Nu er der jo ikke andre GPS-spor tilgængelige for netop disse stier, så kan ikke lige se hvad problemet er? Dog ser det på luftfotos ud til at stien (595203357) ligger lidt længere mod syd
Hjart (2018-07-04 15:59:47+00:00): I JOSM (hvor man kan downloade gps-spor direkte fra spor databasen) kan jeg se flere gps-spor end der ses på den renderede version. Desuden har jeg her brugt terrænskyggekortet (også tilgængeligt i JOSM) som hjælp.
Hans O Nymand (2018-07-05 08:15:48+00:00): Jeg har stadig ikke lært hvordan man går fra et ændringssæt til at se hvilke(t) objekt(er) der er tale om. Men der er 3 stier jeg har rodet med
1) Nordlig øst-vest sti - har vist meget begrænset GPS info
2) Sydlig øst-vest sti har så vidt jeg vewd ét GPS spor
3) Nord-syd sti har 1½ GPS spor, begge mine fra de sidste par dage

Hjælp modtages gerne. Og jeg er fuldt ud klar over det med det sidste GPS spor ikke nødvendigvis er det bedste, jeg var bare ikke klar over at der var andre spor tilgængelige end mine.
Hjart (2018-07-05 09:35:47+00:00): Det er heller ikke lige så let direkte at gennemskue hvad der er hvad ud fra listen herunder og specielt ikke når der er tale om mere end nogle ganske få objekter. Derfor bruger vi værktøjer som f.eks. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Achavi til at gennemskue hvad der er ændret etc (i dette tilfælde: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=60409881). Er man fortrolig med JOSM's søgefunktion er det desuden en ganske væsentlig fordel.
Vil du bare henvise til bestemte objekter på kortet er det nemmeste at bruge "Find objekter" ikonen til højre i vinduet her, placere markøren tæt på det ønskede objekt og klikke. Så får du en liste frem med nærliggende objekter, som du kan vælge mellem.
Med hensyn til gps spor, så kan jeg langs de spor du har rørt ved her, ganske rigtigt se nogle spor. Da lige disse spor ikke er med info om dato og/eller bruger kan jeg ikke afgøre hvem der er ansvarlig for dem.
For lige at demonstrere problemet med gps spor kan vi tagef.eks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/503096762. Langs denne sti er der ca 10 gps spor, som fordeler sig over et bælte der mange steder er 30-40 m bredt (Dette skyldes at træerne forstyrrer satellitsignalerne). Når man ser på sådan noget bliver det helt klart at man ikke med nogen ret kan forlade sig på et enkelt gps-spor og at det er helt urealistisk at håbe på at kunne fastlægge en sti med meters nøjagtighed ud fra sådan et. Dette bedste man kan gøre hvis ikke man har adgang til anvendelige luftfotos etc er at tage et ca snit af alle de tilgængelige gps-spor.
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:40:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
Supaplex (2019-02-07 15:02:57+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Sanniu (2018-07-05 08:20:56+00:00): It's not really a Guest House according to name? Please don't add private notes to OSM.
Supaplex (2018-07-04 14:00:38+00:00): 刪除停用的洛津國小站點
Hjart (2018-10-25 07:35:50+00:00): Bemærk at hvis du som her laver serviceveje ind på kirkegårde bør de tagges med adgang privat for i hvertfald motorkøretøjer
eggie (2018-07-04 14:53:56+00:00): It's okay like this!
PT-53 (2018-07-05 05:34:12+00:00): Hallo Ostseewellen (ehemals Nordseewellen123 ?),
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz den POI-Knoten von AGS Medienservice (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3628331617/history) überarbeitet , eine ÖPNV-Relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8427496) neu angelegt und den POI-Knoten dort als Mitglied eingefügt.
Das war wohl ein Versehen. Ich habe die ÖPNV-Relation deshalb wieder gelöscht.

Das Haupt-Attribut für den POI-Knoten "office=company" könnte man evtl. noch präzisieren. Schau Dir mal das Wiki für office durch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office
Vielleicht findest Du dort etwas passenderes.

Grüße und Willkommen bei OSM
maraf24 (2018-07-04 17:38:58+00:00): Zmiana tertiary na secondary to nie jest drobna poprawa, tym bardziej, że taka zmiana jest błędna.