piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-21 23:36:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105114877 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-21 23:36:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105114877 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
ovruni (2021-04-13 21:32:12+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiado la etiqueta a highway=unclassified [0], sin embargo esta etiqueta se encuentra destinada para carreteras menores que conectando diferentes pueblos.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway=unclassified
mueschel (2021-04-17 11:05:09+00:00): Hi,
you're using the term 'e_scooter' here  - what type of vehicle does it refer to? 'Scooter' is an ambiguous term, it can be used for kick-scooters as well as mopeds. We're still looking for some reasonable terms for keys here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ElectricScooters
CjMalone (2021-04-17 21:48:39+00:00): According to that wiki page they would be classed as "small_electric_vehicle". If there is consensus, feel free to change it, but as it stands most tags are in British English, and this feels like the best key to me.
mueschel (2021-04-18 08:41:55+00:00): We're still discussing... Would be nice to collect some more opinions on the discussion page in the Wiki - feel free to participate!

British English has this problem as well. The Oxford Dictionary defines 'scooter' like a moped or childrens kick-scooter,  while Merriam-Webster names only kick-scooter and its electric variant
mueschel (2021-04-18 08:48:42+00:00): That shouldn't read "British English" up there, sorry. What I wanted to write, it seems like many (including British) people have a "natural feeling" what a scooter is - either one or the other type of vehicle - and are surprised to hear that this is different for other people.
CjMalone (2021-04-19 16:56:56+00:00): Issues like this have come up before, my opinion is that the definition is what's important not the key, and that editors should start abstracting away from key/value towards localised options.

Honestly from the talk page I kind of like scooter_the_big_one and scooter_the_small_one. Where in the en-GB they would be translated as moped and e-scooter.

Once there is consensus I'll happily change all my uses.
lxpeter (2021-04-17 19:03:04+00:00): Hi,
Reviewing this very large change set, it looks like it is machine scripted changes. It has off-set previously carefully mapped street and building locations, since the satellite image it is based on is off by 10-15meters. 
Also, the building outlines are based on the roof outline instead of base, further offset correct location.

Kindly, would you consider reverting this change set? This way we can work together with smaller change sets that are easier to review.

If not possible, please consider using the same script, and do an offset so that streets and buildings end up in correct locations? There are uploaded GPX tracks that can be used for offset, and if possible add your own inspection, gps tracks for offset.
I-76 (2023-06-12 19:00:08+00:00): some very weird things here...

1. sidewalks are different from pedestrian streets

2. DO NOT name things what they are

Thanks.
Jrachi (2021-04-14 10:04:31+00:00): Utilizza le lettere accentuate.
Cà e non Ca'

È meglio!
sorcrosc (2021-04-14 23:07:28+00:00): Ca' di solito è il troncamento di Case e credo sia meglio scriverlo con l'apostrofo.

Ciao
Jrachi (2021-04-15 07:24:13+00:00): Solitamente, si evitano abbreviazioni su OSM.
L'uso dell'apostrofo per segnalare la troncatura non mi risulta essere una pratica corretta nella lingua italiana.
Ma se il local_name è trascrivibile "Ca' di ..." mi sembra automatico che il name debba essere per esteso "Casa di ..."
andgiors (2021-04-15 08:04:24+00:00): il toponimo scritto sui cartelli comunali è "CADR' ". non sapendo quale sia l'origine accertata del nome della località ho pensato di utilizzare una forma che si adattasse ad entrambe. La prima ipotesi è la contrazione di Casa dei Drò (ma non si risale a nessun Drò che vi abbia trascorso la vita o l'abbia costruita - la famiglia Drò ha origini a Vonzo), la seconda è Ca du Ro, che tradotto dal patuà significherebbe Case del Cerchio....però non si trova nessun cerchio, siamo su una riva!!!!
Avevo messo l'accento dopo il tuo primo suggerimento, cosa faccio, metto "Casa Drò"?
poi ho modificato lì vicino il percorso del sentiero ma rimane sempre dov'è....
andgiors (2021-04-15 08:05:51+00:00): mi è sfuggita una O al nome del cartello: CADRO'
Jrachi (2021-04-15 08:18:06+00:00): Il nome.
Ci sono due (anzi tre) linee di pensiero:
1) Si mappa quello che si vede.
name="CADRO'"
2) Si mappa quello che si vede ma nei toponimi si usa le regole della lingua italiana
name="Cadrò"
3) se il nome locale differisce come significato si aggiunge
name="Cadrò"
loc_name="Ca Drò"

L'etimologia è interessante!
Ipotizzabile che il cerchio non fosse un oggetto ma una "tavola rotonda"?

Ma su OSM l'etimologia non si mette.

La storia, ma solo un pochino, si.
Se esistono mappe o una solida memoria originale, "i vecchi lo chiamavano così", esiste anche il tag old_name, in cui inserire il nome scritto sulle vecchie carte.
Ma se il nome è ricordo di tradizione popolare? Come lo scrivo?
Bella domanda!
Io userei l'alfabeto fonetico internazionale.
Molti scrivono come gli pare e non credo esistano modi univoci per trascrivere un nome dialettale.
Se fossi io a mappare quel posto metterei la terza versione. Ma tu sei del posto, conosci il posto, e sai come viene pronunciato.
Devi decidere tu.
felipeeugenio (2021-04-13 21:59:11+00:00): Hola
Qué significan esas formas de bosques?
Supaplex (2021-04-14 02:23:55+00:00): Hi, Could you explain your editing, because someone delete polygon Taiwan Strait, replacing with a simple node. Now you are adding a simple polygon.
And no local mappers are council for that matters
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102889215
Supaplex (2021-04-14 02:24:08+00:00): https://osmcha.org/changesets/102759369
related edit
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102889215
EnumMapper (2021-04-14 19:46:46+00:00): Hi,

There is a discussion here: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/79613/multipolygon-taiwan-strait-does-not-show-in-nominatim-search

The previous broken multipolyon was removed by moderator Frederik and replaced to a node. However, a node strait does not appear look good either in Nominatim search or Carto rendering: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/305639278
trigpoint (2021-04-14 12:36:57+00:00): Hi
The UK community have obviously been discussing tagging of beer gardens and outside seating areas in the past few days.

Whilst in this case I probably didn't choose the best tag in landuse, simply moving the surveyed information that there is a garden here to the fact that you can sit down outside, which is not the same as I can sit in a pleasant garden.

Please bear this in mind when fixing tags remotely.

Cheers Phil
redd (2021-04-14 14:21:40+00:00): Hi Phil,
thanks for the response to my change. There were only 2x landuse=beer_garden in whole UK and even worldwide.
A beer garden is obviosly not well defined yet.. it can be all kind of outside sitting places.. does not even need a "garden" at all.. see picture search: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=beer+garden&t=h_&iax=images&ia=images
Of course I wanted to be as sensitive as possible to your initial tag, which was already untouched since 7 years! I added a note, that it is originally mapped as "beer_garden", and think this is enough to somebody from even remote places to interpretate this as beer garden. 
You stated, that this was intented to be tagged as "garden", therefore I now added this information as outdoor_seating=garden. Maybe you can add even more local knowledge, just have a look at the possibilities at the page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Doutdoor_seating

greetings,
redd
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 11:37:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103098788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in the USA by a mapper trying to evade a block - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4931 .
mariotomo (2021-04-13 23:59:41+00:00): hola. perdona si pregunto, pero de dónde obtuviste el nombre de la calle?
MundoMaps (2021-04-15 13:58:16+00:00): Hola, mariotomo! Gracias por contactarme. Un usuario de la aplicación de Apple Maps proveyó el nombre.
mariotomo (2021-04-14 00:00:54+00:00): hola. perdona si pregunto, pero de dónde obtuviste el nombre de la calle?
MundoMaps (2021-04-15 13:58:20+00:00): Hola, mariotomo! Gracias por contactarme. Un usuario de la aplicación de Apple Maps proveyó el nombre.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-31 03:58:21+00:00): Blocked & all Changesets reverted by DWG for vandalism: changeset/131903795
nw520 (2021-04-14 22:12:57+00:00): Hallo goodidea, bei der Kreuzung östlich der Alten Brücke hast du ein cycleway=asl eingetragen. Soweit ich mich nicht irre, liegt dort zwar die Haltelinie für MIV versetzt hinter der des Radweges, hat aber keine Aufstellfläche vor dem MIV, auf der sich Radfahrende direkt vor diesem platzieren können und ist somit kein ARAS. (Beispiel für ARAS wäre die Kreuzung Paul-Marien-Str./Mainzer Str. nördlich kommend)

Hier finde ich den Wiki-Artikel zu cycleway=asl etwas uneindeutig und vermisse eine klare Definition eines ASL, die besagt, ob eine Aufstellfläche vor dem MIV obligatorisch ist oder die reine versetzte Haltelinie ausreichend ist. Aus "advanced stop line" wäre die Anwendung hier inbegriffen, bei der als Synonym genannten Bezeichnung "bike box" eher nicht.

Vor diesem Hintergrund: Denkst hier wäre es sinnvoll zu kartieren, dass keine Aufstellfläche vorliegt?

Beste Grüße
nw520 (2021-04-14 22:14:11+00:00): Ah, sorry, vergessen: Betroffener Knoten n8627195512
nw520 (2021-04-27 21:48:05+00:00): Hallo goodidea, in Saarbrücken kenne ich ebenfalls keine "echten" ARAS bei einspurigen Straßen. Der Hauptzweck scheint vor allem darin zu liegen, dass man sich bei roter Ampel als Radler zum Abbiegen umpositionieren kann. Die vorgezogenen Haltelinien dienen meiner Kenntnis nach vor allem dazu, die Sichtbarkeit zu erhöhen. Wie es in anderen Städten aussieht, weiß ich nicht.

Dass ich den ASL-Knoten vor der der Ampel platziert hatte, habe ich durchgängig gemacht. Dabei hatte ich mich an der Wikiseite orientiert: "Create [the ASL-node] ideally level with the stop line at the front of the painted box.", was ich so übernommen habe. Im Wiki war aber die Annahme, dass die Ampel auf der Kreuzung kartiert ist; der Fall mit Platzierung auf der Haltlinie wurde gar nicht berücksichtigt. Nach kurzem Überfliegen scheint die Situation in Deutschland auch nicht hundertprozentig eindeutig zu sein: In "Langendreer", "Hilden", "Aachen", "Berlin" und "Geel" (NL) wird das ASL hinter der Ampel gesetzt, in "Heerlen" und "Fulda" vor der Ampel. Angesichts deiner Begründung und der größeren Verbreitung werde ich dann demnächst nacharbeiten und die von mir eingezeichneten ASLs dem anpassen. Weitestgehend ist das ja bereits von dir vorgenommen worden.

Du hast natürlich recht, dass es derzeit an einer Alternative fehlt, wie man die vorgezogene Haltelinie von einer ARAS unterscheiden kann. Dennoch finde ich es etwas unbefriedigend, dass es keine Möglichkeit gibt, zwischen den beiden Dingen zu unterscheiden. Einen Untertag im Stile von asl=area/asl=line fände ich grundsätzlich tatsächlich ganz ansprechend, vielleicht ließe sich das auch mit der "Wie-viele-Spuren-ist-die-Aufweitung-breit"-Breite erfassen — da könnte ich mir mal was überlegen.

Soweit ich sehe scheint im englischsprachigen Raum das Konzept einer vorgezogenen Haltlinie nicht sonderlich üblich zu sein. Auch im Wikipedia-Artikel werden Box und Linie synonym verwendet, während die Niederlande oder Luxemburg da schärfer trennen und auch in Wikidata sorgt die englische Gleichgültigkeit für Verwirrung.

Beste Grüße und danke für deine Antwort, übrigens!


PS: Noch kurz zur Begrifflichkeit, wie du aber sagtest ist das nicht relevant für OSM: Der "aufgeweitete Radaufstellstreifen" bezeichnet tatsächlich nur die "Bike box", eine (aus Perspektive des MIV) vorgezogene Haltlinie mit Radweg daneben ohne Ausweitung fällt hingegen nicht unter den Begriff. [1]

[1] http://www.wuerzburg.de/media/www.wuerzburg.de/org/med_14177/50277_anlage4__erlaeuterungen_regelwerk.pdf
blackboxlogic (2021-04-14 21:19:44+00:00): It accidentally got removed in change #100797661. Thanks for noticing!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102889938
SColchester (2021-04-14 10:12:18+00:00): Checked - several buildings unsquared, please ensure to square the corners of buildings by pressing 'q' on your keyboard after you have tagged them as buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102890037
ash_win (2021-04-15 02:42:33+00:00): Hi youngtsai,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on Service road roads.Kindly Check with way 877373836
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102958591
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102890149
Glassman (2021-04-17 00:06:20+00:00): #TIP: That looks like an alley. Typically we don't add names to alleys unless there is a sign. If we do, the name is spelled out instead of abbreviated. The reason - software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you review your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102890211
Neil Sorens (2021-04-17 00:15:57+00:00): Well, the reason I’ve edited the map is that apps whose mapping functionality uses OSM don’t know where my house is. Its address is on this small street, so it would be difficult for these apps to become aware of my house’s correct location if the street remains unnamed here.
RicoElectrico (2021-04-14 12:14:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2621336
Vinber-Pro (2021-04-26 15:34:37+00:00): salut,
peut-être ajouté access=private sur la piscine non ? car ce n'est pas une piscine privée si ?
Vincent
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102890583
SomeoneElse (2021-04-13 23:12:32+00:00): Just wanted to say thanks again for all your efforts tidying this stuff up!
Best Regards,
Andy
Terrajoven (2021-04-13 22:48:15+00:00): Added footpaths in Kampung Desa Aman neighborhood. #adt 
Sources: Esri World Imagery; Strava
user_5359 (2021-04-14 04:04:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.

see https://www.osm.org/way/930441514, https://www.osm.org/way/930441517
maxolasersquad (2021-05-12 18:53:08+00:00): Remember that the name tag is "To provide details of the name for a feature included in OpenStreetMap."
Source: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Are you sure these recycling bins exist? We map actual features, not possible features.
Tilia_J (2021-04-14 12:15:35+00:00): Why use the latin name for the modern municipality which was founded in the nineteenth century?
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 15:18:49+00:00): Based it on info i found on Wikidata at the time it now has been chanced to Apeldornium

https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q101918
Tilia_J (2023-01-22 18:49:58+00:00): Historical records for "Apeldoorn" can be traced back as early as 792 where it was referred to as "villa ut marca Appoldro"

I consider the Latin name a transliteration with no historical significance.

Besides that, you applied the name on the municipality of Apeldoorn which was only founded in the nineteenth century instead of the (original) city / village.
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 18:54:10+00:00): I think we should keep the latin name even for the municipality as it is the modern incarnation of Apeldoorn which tracés it roots to villa ut marca Appoldro
Tilia_J (2023-01-22 19:24:20+00:00): I don't think so. There is no indication of any Roman (like the well-known Tacitus or the one who described "Flevo") who mentioned the name "Apeldornium".

Until the nineteenth century "Apeldoorn" was only a tiny village.

Many Dutch municipalities are eponymous with the largest or oldest built-up area within its boundaries.

This doesn't mean that the municipality "inherits" the history of its namesake.
radiotrefoil (2021-07-19 14:37:30+00:00): Thank you for your good work on the houses around here - but I notice you have copied the houses from changeset 102891064 to this block without checking them, please take care to avoid mistakes like this
AnselmoMatsui (2021-07-19 22:50:46+00:00): Hi,
You are right.. Due to a deadline I copied and paste quickly. Feel free to make changes if you wish.
nevw (2021-07-20 01:24:45+00:00): @AnselmoMatsui  
should we revert this or do you feel free to correct.
nevw (2021-08-18 03:19:04+00:00): no suitable response from mapper, reverted to improve the map.
fishcharlie (2021-05-30 19:53:33+00:00): The Target (node 2698621578) is not currently open. I don't think this is the correct tagging because of that. It gives the impression that this store is open, which it is not.
Your Village Maps (2021-05-30 20:06:22+00:00): I have edited it, adding:
opening_date = 2021-07
check_date = 2021-05-30
Tilia_J (2021-04-14 09:30:17+00:00): As far as I know the name Baduhennae lucus is for the Frisian forest far north in the Netherlands

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baduhenna
https://www.ensie.nl/betekenis/baduhennae-lucus
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 15:20:00+00:00): Based it on info i found on wikidat https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1153251
Tilia_J (2023-01-22 18:10:30+00:00): I didn't find the name on the wikidata page you linked.

I did a quick search and found the proper name, mentioned on the latin lemma of the Netherlands: https://la.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nederlandia

I changed it accordingly: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131576456
dgitto (2021-07-16 09:11:30+00:00): Ciao, cerca di non usare nulla nel tag "name" che non sia il nome proprio di un oggetto. Senza elementi descrittivi come quello tra parentesi.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
highflyer74 (2021-04-27 10:30:11+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Irgendetwas bei Deiner Editier-Technik verursacht sich selbst überschneidende Weg. Ansehen kannst Du das hier http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.94724&lat=52.12173&zoom=17

Wenn Du Hilfe brauchst, melde Dich gern, damit wir der Sache auf den Grund gehen können.

Viele Grüße!
o27 (2021-04-27 11:28:52+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Sollte jetzt behoben sein: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103702599
btwhite92 (2021-04-15 13:38:29+00:00): Please be specific with your changeset comments (obviously you are making edits, it is clear where they are being made by looking at the boundary of the changeset) - your changes tend to make substantial adjustments to roadway classifications that other mappers would appreciate hearing your justifications for.
Kha_nam (2021-04-15 07:18:46+00:00): Hi tsailawrence
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road ,Kindly check with way 129424005
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102972615
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102891954
user_5359 (2021-04-17 04:57:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Kha_nam (2021-04-15 07:12:23+00:00): Hi brennanBreuer
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road .Kindly check with way 823694595
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102972195
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102892551
SColchester (2021-04-14 10:06:13+00:00): Checked - several buildings unsquared, please ensure to square the corners of buildings by pressing 'q' on your keyboard after you have tagged them as buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102892565
jleedev (2021-04-14 02:32:15+00:00): The barrier at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/106057698 should be adjusted too, if this is to be a bicycle=permissive route.
mstriewe (2021-05-07 18:59:37+00:00): Hallo. Seit dieser Änderung gibt es ein Problem mit einer doppelten Linie in der neuen Relation für den Rosengarten (siehe http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.69916&lat=51.19318&zoom=18).
Sollte der Parkplatz ausdrücklich mit in die Fläche des Rosengartens aufgenommen werden?

MfG
Michael
Glg11 (2021-05-10 02:29:53+00:00): Hi Michael,
danke für den Hinweis. Ich hoffe, ich habs nun richtig editiert.
Gruss
mstriewe (2021-05-11 18:54:26+00:00): Hallo. Ja, sieht gut aus und es werden keine Fehler mehr angezeigt.

MfG
Michael
Fariduddin (2021-04-14 06:31:07+00:00): This part of JI-189 is not a secondary road. Instead, it's a minor/unclassified road.
EnumMapper (2021-04-30 15:29:08+00:00): Hello @Supaplex,

Not sure if you saw my reply on the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102889215

My apology if it was a bad change. However, with a node strait, it's no longer visible on the map.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-28 04:54:26+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3283342 ?
karson_ (2021-04-15 14:12:36+00:00): Hi, sorry to bother you, but I have a few issues with your edit.

1. You misaligned buildings and ways to offset imagery. You should reference other imagery, GPX traces, and existing features to establish an offset datum.

2. You added nonsquare buildings. In the iD editor, you can press `Q` with a polygon selected and it will become square.

3. You aligned the Art Building pond to the edge of the foliage rather than the edge of the pond. Trees usually overhang water bodies, so you should try and use winter imagery so there is no obstruction.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102894866
isaacibex (2021-04-15 23:42:37+00:00): Hi karsonkevin2.  Thanks for taking the time to reach out and for the constructive notes. I'm a sporadic user on this platform, so I apologize for any norm violations I may have made, and I'll make sure to do better in the future. No obligation, but I have a couple questions.

Re: your comments.
1. To clarify, is the gist that the default satellite imagery on the editor is not necessarily accurate, and it's inappropriate to base your edits purely on that imagery? I see you mention other imagery, GPX traces, and other features, is there a standard mechanism by which to verify I'm using accurate information? Or is that something I need to do my due diligence on every time?

2. I didn't know that, thank you for sharing, though I should have realized that for square buildings I shouldn't just eyeball it. For buildings that have a combination of squared and rounded sides, is there a means by which to square the square parts without disrupting the non-square components?

3.  Your point about using winter imagery is well taken, though to be a tiny bit defensive I will note that the previous shape of the art building pond also did not align with reality. Still, I should have done my due diligence instead of eyeballing it and going from memory.

Also, is there any sort of limit on the number of changes you should include within one edit? I made over 100 changes within this edit, is that problematic for verification?

Thanks again for your comment.
Kovoschiz (2021-04-14 05:01:00+00:00): 1. You removed the `residential=apartments` there. 
2. The `landuse=retail` shouldn't be added, with `shop=mall` already describing it.