piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2022-07-03 22:31:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
FreedSky (2022-07-24 02:08:19+00:00): 不要添加不存在的东西 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14305810/history#map=11/28.5541/115.7680
literan (2022-07-03 17:47:21+00:00): вы здесь создали мультиполигон здания из одного члена, дублирующий существующий полигон.



так делать не надо. Перенесу теги на полигон
dressed-pleasekin (2022-07-03 18:53:16+00:00): Благодарю за исправление!
Только не совсем понял: как корректно связать эти два строения с1 и с2 в ансамбль как здание 12А, на котором бы висели соответствующие теги? Посмотрел - сейчас центральное строение 1 это мультиполигон, не связанный с с2
literan (2022-07-03 20:23:46+00:00): ээээ.... такого понятия как "ансамбль" в OSM нет...

мы историческую информацию не храним, сейчас это два здания, даже если раньше это был некий ансамбль

или я не совсем понял, что вы имеете в виду
user_8101879 (2022-07-03 12:32:25+00:00): Hi,

the relation 1638536vis empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software : https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825).

Best regards
E de Wit (2022-07-03 13:03:49+00:00): Hi,

Strange, in JOSM version 18427 the empty relation isn't even in the list with loaded relations (let alone as a validation error).
The relation can be removed here when it appears with 0 members.

I'll get the new JOSM executalbe and see if that fixes it. I'm usually lagging a little bit behind to keep the Dutch BAG plug-in working.

-E de Wit
E de Wit (2022-07-03 13:20:35+00:00): I updated to 'josm-tested.jar (version 18463' and have the same result.
This version didn't give me a warning after validation and the empty relation doesn't appear in the relations list.
E de Wit (2022-07-03 13:39:46+00:00): Update: with some reverter plug-in trickery I'm able to remove said relation without damaging my changeset.

I've not done so (yet) because this case might require some further investigation in order to fix JOSM.
E de Wit (2022-07-03 19:30:38+00:00): Removed the empty relation in changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123162783

And provided feedback in order to improve JOSM:
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825#comment:74
user_8101879 (2022-07-10 19:13:21+00:00): Good work.
Best regards
Fred
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-09 04:29:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/700481840/history - have you wanted to use sport=soccer ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-17 15:56:14+00:00): sending PM
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-30 14:20:48+00:00): I opened https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4271979
Nastaran_Sabouri (2024-07-14 12:05:21+00:00): It was wrong
Thank you for correcting
gscholz (2022-07-07 05:03:36+00:00): Hi Farras,
this chageset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=116.41626&lat=-8.71062&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123146836

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Farras (2022-07-07 06:21:03+00:00): It's done. Thanks, Guido.
gurglypipe (2022-07-04 08:22:28+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing OSM! Please consider writing more explanatory changeset comments when you edit: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks!
Niiepce (2022-07-09 13:23:39+00:00): Hallo
Warum hast du hier building=yes zur Bank hinzugefügt? War das ein Versehen?
uvok (2022-07-09 13:48:06+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, da bin ich wohl im Editor abgerutscht oder hab mich da vertippt. Ich mach es wieder weg
Niiepce (2022-07-10 11:14:18+00:00): Super! Dankeschön
maraf24 (2022-09-28 12:12:35+00:00): Co na Wita Stwosza robi znowu PKO BP?
Bank dawno temu sprzedał ten budynek, a wcześniej stał pusty,
GSV?
Mordechai23 (2022-09-30 09:49:51+00:00): Rzeczywiście wynieśli się w 2018. Jak tu robiłem to przekleiłem po prostu PKO z node na obszar. 

Najnowsze info jakie znalazłem z marca mówi że remontują pod kawalerki

https://gazetawroclawska.pl/dawny-bank-pko-w-centrum-wroclawia-bedzie-apartamentowcem-ale-luksus-wizualizacje/ar/c9-16091245

...ale jak tu wtedy przechodziłem to nie przypominam sobie, żebym widział jakieś roboty
maraf24 (2022-09-30 18:47:33+00:00): A skąd by się to node miało wziąć?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1393120
maraf24 (2023-03-06 12:04:25+00:00): Kolejne: zakres ulicy Łaciarskiej skopiowany z Google Maps.
Arisuaq (2022-07-03 11:21:46+00:00): This makes absolutely no sense. Private road marked as motorway? WTF? I'm angry this will take an eternity to disappear from all map layers.
Karcsesz (2022-07-28 14:23:25+00:00): This "some racing circle" is a short stretch of actual motorway built to specifications for vehicle and software testing, so I feel it would be justified to mark it as such. It really is a bit of an eyesore tho. Do you know of a way to limit render visibility to a given zoom level?
TrickyFoxy (2022-07-05 20:28:47+00:00): 👋 Аккуратнее меняйте теги: большой кусок реки стал дорогой:)
Исправил
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123147438
wkdgs (2022-07-05 08:08:52+00:00): Hi,

private Abfallbehälter werden üblicherweise nicht gemappt. Du kannst den ruhig ganz löschen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123147650
ottwiz (2022-07-03 11:34:04+00:00): *Washington County PA. (just the boundary of the project is a bit bigger)
ig4map (2022-07-03 20:07:37+00:00): Hello! Thank you for dive center information. Could you please mark also dive sites around Thoddo? Rocky Island, South Corner, Two Towers etc
As an example of dive site tagging https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8584208531

and please append tag tourism=attraction for new dive sites 

Wiki page:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=scuba_diving
yves klein (2022-07-04 19:22:04+00:00): Dieser Wiesenweg ist noch deutlich erkennbar. Ich ging auf ihm noch vor wenigen Tagen. Nach der on-the-ground Regel von osm wurde er zu Unrecht gelöscht und muss revertiert werden.
der_suelzilianer (2022-07-17 08:55:15+00:00): Ist auch meine Sicht der Dinge
Nakaner-repair (2022-08-16 22:33:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124993126 where the changeset comment is: Revert owner vandalism (changeset 123148283)
ma-rt-in (2022-07-11 05:59:17+00:00): Hallo,
 was heißt hier ungenutzt Line, das waren Admin-Grenzen, die haben einen Zweck!

vg
user_177389 (2022-07-11 07:48:52+00:00): Hallo ma-rt-in,

schon klar, stand ja dran, wahrscheinlich für Ortsteile. Ungenutzt = nicht in Relationen verwendet, also vollständig als Fläche mit dem entsprechenden Namen. Denn nur so ist es auswertbar. Seit mehr als 13 Jahren lagen die Linien brach und wurden über die Zeit eher unfreiwillig/unbewusst verändert. Sollten die Ortsteile anhand einer vollständigeren Quelle doch mal eingezeichnet werden, wird diese herangezogen und erfahrungsgemäß kaum nach schon eingezeichneten Fragmenten für etwaige Korrektur/Einbau gesucht, was das Einpflegen ja eher verkompliziert.

Beste Grüße,
Mario
AkuAnakTimur (2022-07-05 10:19:40+00:00): Betting spam from Indonesia
fabiotofy (2022-08-08 13:20:12+00:00): Ciao, perché hai cancellato le due rotonde nei pressi di Grado ? Quella per entrare a Pineta e quella per entrate a Goppion ? Ti assicuro che sono già state inaugurate da tempo e al 100 % funzionali
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123149085
czubi (2022-07-18 12:48:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27756575#map=19/51.00403/11.56566&layers=N
Was ist mit der Dorfstraße? ISt die so geblieben?
Magst Du die Hausnummern auch noch umschreiben?
Tip: Bei Straßenumbenennungen immer die alten Straßennamen unter old_name stehen lassen.

Straßenname hab ich fix gemacht, war nur die Kirche
user_15552334 (2022-07-13 18:47:33+00:00): Uno reverse card
user_15552334 (2022-07-17 12:01:37+00:00): Anywhere with over 100k people is a city.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123149151
user_15552334 (2022-07-17 18:42:57+00:00): .
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123149151
V-Li (2022-07-03 13:38:53+00:00): Hallo,

wolltest du die konkreten Öffnungszeiten ergänzen? Irgendwie fehlen die jetzt.

Grüße
Josef73 (2022-07-03 17:09:22+00:00): Guten Tag, die Daten des tags opening_hours benutzen einen spezielen Syntax. Siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3AKey%3Aopening_hours . Wenn die Daten des tags opening_hours von einer website kommen, kann man den tag opening_hours:url benutzen. Dies hatte ich gemacht. Somit waren die Daten nicht weg. In der zwischenzeit habe ich einen Revert auf meinen Änderungsatz gemacht, somit ist der alte Zustand wieder hergestellt.

Grüße
V-Li (2022-07-05 06:29:38+00:00): Ja, die Syntax kenne ich.  Habe jetzt die Öffnungszeiten in der richtigen Syntax eingetragen.
user_15552334 (2022-07-13 18:48:39+00:00): Fun fact I go to that school, it's more like hell, that's why I changed it.
School is just another name for hell imo.
user_15552334 (2022-07-17 18:42:51+00:00): .
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123149183
Đuro Jiří (2022-07-03 12:35:07+00:00): Anche le due strade sterrate che hai collegato sono state mappate bene, perché la strada è ricoperta di vegetazione, non è percorribile, nemmeno a piedi.
starsep (2022-09-11 19:51:03+00:00): Proszę nie dodawaj duplikatów stacji Veturilo. Nazwy opisowe nie są zbyt przydatne
user_8101879 (2022-07-04 12:36:15+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14318116 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM asked you about this, why do you have created this useless relation despite the warning ? Was the message not clear according to you ? (I'm not telling you that you are wrong, I just want to understand and to help JOSM's team to improve their software : https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/21825).

Best regards
CartoLot (2022-07-05 09:00:10+00:00): Good morning,
Indeed the relation 14318116 is empty and was created without express purpose. An error on my part in JOSM. I will inquire about how to delete it but if you know how to do so I invite you to correct this error. I didn’t understand the error message.
Good contribution to openstreetmap, 3630
user_8101879 (2022-07-15 15:15:17+00:00): Hi,

no problem, I will delete it.
Best regards
BCNorwich (2022-07-03 14:25:57+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OenStreetMap.

I've reverted these changes as they are incorrect. If you need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Koolkate (2022-07-04 20:45:55+00:00): Hi Bernard.
I was just trying to include the Community Garden in, as this is new to the Hospital, but slightly apart. I think I’m right in saying all the other activities, if not inside the hospital,  start from there, usually only when the hospital is open. This may not be the case for the garden which will be accessible at weekends and perhaps other times particularly during the summer.
Sorry if I messed up.
Regards
Cathy
BCNorwich (2022-07-05 06:40:46+00:00): Hi, You haven't messed up, just went a bit astray on learning, all is OK.

I can't determine where the Community Garden is so I can't add it. If it is added the tagging must be accurate as to who is allowed access and when.

Regards Bernard
Koolkate (2022-07-05 09:37:21+00:00): It’s at the Community Hospital site but the rest is fluid. 
There may be a way around this but you’ll know. 

Community Garden 
Open Day and Fete

Community Hospital and Garden.
On the poster I have, it says. 

Come along and see the wonderful Community Garden development at Wells Community Hospital and see how you can get involved.
If it has to stay as it is that’s fair enough. I’ve never used this site before but I most certainly will now. Thank you for your help Bernard. 
Best wishes
Cathy Gates.
Koolkate (2022-07-05 09:41:08+00:00): Node 1 says Cummity Hospital Trust. I’ve only just noticed this. You might be able to change it.
Again 
Best wishes
Cathy Gates.
BCNorwich (2022-07-05 09:53:45+00:00): Hi, Ref "Node 1 says Cummity Hospital Trust." I did revert the tags on that node to their original state. That node POI is actually the bus stop north side of Mill Road. Its name on the NAPTON transport list is "Hospital, opp".

Regards Bernard.
GerdP (2022-07-06 05:13:06+00:00): Moin!
Nach welchen Kriterien setzt Du das shoulder=no? 
Ich habe z.B. vor ein paar Wochen hier https://www.osm.org/node/2245348203 einen Unfall beobachtet, da passte ein Trecker mit Anhänger locker rechts neben die Straße.
AkuAnakTimur (2022-07-05 10:19:51+00:00): Betting spam from Indonesia
AkuAnakTimur (2022-07-05 10:20:05+00:00): More betting spam from Indonesia
Augusta Co VA Address and Building Import (2022-07-03 13:02:56+00:00): Add missing source tag: VGIN Virginia Address Points
user_12733236 (2022-07-03 13:04:57+00:00): چهار راه پرستار؟
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-16 03:20:42+00:00): 朋友你好，在中国境内的要素name通常只填写name:zh对应的简体中文名，详情可见
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#China

感谢您的贡献
LockOnGuy (2022-07-03 14:02:50+00:00): Hello, why did you remove the other name tags?
Bravo Mapper (2022-07-03 16:31:38+00:00): Sorry my friend.
It was by mistake .
cyton (2022-07-03 18:45:58+00:00): Oh, is that strictly necessary?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123151038
highflyer74 (2022-07-04 06:07:51+00:00): Moin!

Sei so nett, aussagekräftige Änderungssatzkommentare zu verwenden. Lies Dir dazu bitte einmal die folgenden Links durch:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Danke!
Dimitar155 (2023-05-24 15:14:21+00:00): Здравствуйте messof_anegovich,

Вы намеренно удалили название вагонного депо или это было сделано по ошибке (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123102924)?
mueschel (2022-07-04 08:18:11+00:00): Please stop adding these thousands of 'Sprinkler' nodes. Use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or engage with the community to find out which keys to use!
LockOnGuy (2022-07-03 14:01:29+00:00): Hello ESKH, why did you remove name:ar from way 732755345?
pitfire (2022-07-04 04:18:35+00:00): Hallo  bernd,
Niederkassel: Gebäudeumrisse angepasst: Weg: 35740147 schneidet Hs.15-19.
Sieht im Luftbild stark nach fehlendem "attribute tunnel=building_passage" aus.
berndw (2022-07-04 12:21:44+00:00): Bei der Sparkasse habe ich nur die Knoten im Umriss verschoben und die Lücke zwischen der 11 und 13 geschlossen. 
Kannst Du die Passage bitte eintragen?

Bernd
pitfire (2022-07-04 13:39:03+00:00): erledigt.
wkdgs (2022-07-05 08:32:20+00:00): Hi,

wurde das Gebäude mit der Nummer 12 wirklich abgerissen oder hast du es aus Versehen gelöscht?
wkdgs (2022-07-05 08:33:07+00:00): Hi,

wurde das Gebäude mit der Nummer 12 wirklich abgerissen oder hast du es aus Versehen gelöscht?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123152036
NOM37154SUPAMA (2022-07-05 17:52:29+00:00): oh sorry ..
ich bin neu und wollte nur die shop entfernen
wkdgs (2022-07-05 08:33:14+00:00): Hi,

wurde das Penny-Gebäude wirklich abgerissen oder wurde der Penny nur geschlossen?
NOM37154SUPAMA (2022-07-05 17:53:25+00:00): ups 

penny wurde geschlossen
Violaine_Do (2022-12-21 20:36:24+00:00): corrected bridge viaduc and bank bred as not real on site, please check with local information before modifying next time or provide your sources
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123152342
joost schouppe (2023-10-27 07:41:33+00:00): Op de luchtfoto's zien de werken aan de Herestraat er al grotendeels afgerond uit, ik heb aangepast wat ik zag. Misschien weet jij meer - ik vond het wel raar dat normaal de werken pas in 2026 klaar zouden zijn
MxxCon (2022-07-03 21:44:30+00:00): Hello.
What kind of mural is this? Do you have more details about it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123152470
mhx7j8 (2022-07-05 20:14:13+00:00): Trying to find the exact details.
Jakka (2022-07-04 12:33:51+00:00): Je wist wegen, zijn deze volledig weg ? niet meer te zien ter plaatse ?
highway=contruction is een optie om werken van wegen aan te duiden waar niemand door mag (ook te voet)
MateoS01 (2022-07-04 14:42:42+00:00): Beste Jakka

Bedankt voor je bericht. 

Dit gedeelte van Herestraat bestaat uit twee richtingen met enkele rijstrook met een verhoogde middenstrook. Momenteel is de rijstrook vanaf de rotonde met “het teken” tot het ambulant centrum volledig weggehaald. 

Men kan deze strook momenteel op geen manier meer gebruiken, doordat deze niet meer bestaat. Ook het voetpad is langs deze rijstrook verwijderd.

Gemotoriseerd verkeer kan momenteel enkel in één richting verplaatsen, inclusief hulpdiensten. Hierbij gebruikt verkeer de rijstrook van de oorspronkelijke richting die naar de rotonde toe ging. Voetgangers en fietsers kunnen wel nog het fiets- en voetpad aan de buitenring van de campus gebruiken.

Vanaf de bus terminal tot het ambulant centrum kruist verkeer van rijstrook, doordat hier de omgekeerde richting is onderbroken. Hierdoor is er een tijdelijke rustplaats voor buschauffeurs ontstaan op de rijstrook richting de rotonde van parking oost.

Tenslotte is ook de rijstrook vanaf berg taborweg richting en tot en met het chirurgisch dagcentrum onderbroken. Deze is wel nog zichtbaar, maar fysiek met betonbarricades geblokkeerd. Ook hier kan verkeer slechts één richting rijden, zijnde van parking oost richting parking west.

Alle prioritaire voertuigen en bussen rijden in één richting, vanaf rotonde oost, naar west, en via campus gasthuisberg terug naar parking oost.

Eventueel kan ik foto’s of een huidig circulatieplan doorsturen indien nodig. Dit zal ten vroegste tegen 7 juli kunnen gebeuren, wegens toelatingsexamen geneeskunde morgen.



Met vriendelijke groeten 
MateoS01



Met vriendelijke groeten
AsgerFrank (2022-07-05 16:06:43+00:00): Deleted, as the repair station/pump was already on the map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8364927959
czubi (2022-07-05 16:45:45+00:00): Danke, ich hatte es später (ausserhalb von Streetcomplete) gesehen, habe hier im Urlaub aber keinen Computer um es löschen. Hätte ich aber zuhause nachgeholt.
AsgerFrank (2022-07-05 17:00:22+00:00): Freut mich, dass es auch eine Möglichkeit gewesen sein könnte :-)
Russ McD (2022-10-13 02:39:46+00:00): Wiki or not,  I don't understand the logic of changing one and a half sides of the Chiang Mai Moat road to Primary, while the rest remains Tertiary.
And if routing is the logic, then how does travelling N-S differ from S-N ?
Physically both inner and outer roads are most the same (2-lane) so why the huge difference in status?
Nithinat S (2022-10-13 04:30:19+00:00): The rationale is to connect the hanging ends of 107 and 108, and the suitable link, as I edited, is a way through part of the moat. Some of it may be a one-way road.

By the way, I agree that it can appear strange at times. The requirements for urban roads differ from those for intercity highway, then I agree that all sides of the moat can be primary.
AlaskaDave (2025-08-03 00:45:30+00:00): Hi,
You tagged the ramp on the east side of the Super Highway at the junction of route 1136 as highway=trunk and name:en= Super Highway
I believe this way and all it's sections should be tagged highway=trunk_lnk and should not have either a ref=11 or a name. It merely provides access the the Super Highway and therefore should be tagged just like the similar ramp on the east side of the Superhighway.

What do you say about this?

Dave
Nithinat S (2025-08-03 04:12:39+00:00): Are you referring to the west side of the Super Highway? (829706361). If that's the case, I think typically a road with an overpass bridge should be both tagged the same. The main road that passes through the intersection should not be tagged as a link. Btw, I understand that this situation is ambiguous. If the overpass is considered the main road and the section across the intersection is considered a branch-off link to 1136, then yes it can be a trunk_link.
AlaskaDave (2025-08-03 06:33:30+00:00): I'm talking about the east side ramps. Those are the ones you edited to add the ref=11 and name tags. The west side is tagged correctly, that is, as a trunk_lnk without any names or ref added.

I believe the tags you added are incorrect. They aren't harmful, in fact, they could be helpful to a simplistic routing algorithm. However, the reason I was editing that intersection was to add destination and destination refs to the first sections of the highways branching off the 1136. I think that will supply information to routers in a more appropriate way.

I'm not going to remove any of your tagging but I think you should.

Respectfully,

Dave
Nithinat S (2025-08-03 09:19:28+00:00): Sorry I'm not sure which east side ramp you're referring to. I'm not changing the tag of the way 1152875361 and 829706379. What I changed is only the west one (829706361 and 829706378). Or you mean another one? Could you give me that way's id?
Bravo Mapper (2022-07-04 08:07:07+00:00): Why did you change my point ?
Look Carefully :
There are two points near each other 
one is Arabic and one is Kurdi.
Why do you rename both to Arabic ?
Is this correct to put 2 same exact names next to each other ?

Why do you do this ?
LockOnGuy (2022-07-04 11:35:13+00:00): Hello Bravo Mapper,       
There are 2 points with "place=suburb" for the same area.      
The main one is node 2488265639,     
which has all the corrected tags for 8 years.    
You, yesterday added another node which is node 9863833285 with the same tag as "place=suburb" for the same neighborhood, you can't do this. it should be only one node for the same area, not 2.     
I left you a comment yesterday in changeset 123150843 asking you, "why did you remove the other name tags?" and you said, "sorry, it was a mistake", therefore I reverted your edits.      
Regards.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:54:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Herman Lee (2022-07-03 14:19:49+00:00): 我的建议是县道尽量请用三级道路。
rosschen (2022-07-03 15:12:02+00:00): 感谢您的建议。不过三级道路可能不大合适，一二级可能有一些异议，我修改的这几个基本都是可查得城市主干道建设，在zf或官媒里可考。另，副中心市政府旁边的几条大道用二级道路无事实完全不相符。
Herman Lee (2022-07-03 15:38:57+00:00): 如果是有编号的话，还是以编号作为优先级考虑，不过这些媒体的用词并不能说明其osm中的等级情况。
国内的话天地图新版12级可以作为参考使用，但是国内的道路等级划分似乎和osm的划分有所不同。可以参考一下wiki的内容
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%A0%87%E6%B3%A8%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97
Herman Lee (2022-07-03 15:41:49+00:00): 如果方便的话，请移步到QQ群934831605讨论一下
rosschen (2022-07-03 15:47:04+00:00): 媒体的资讯其实也都是来自于官媒，并非个人自媒体杜撰，很多工程文件也可以查询到相关的道路信息。如若您觉得修改的等级与事实严重不符，可以进行优化调整。稍晚一点我加一下您给的群(抱歉其实现在比较少打开QQ了)。