piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-12-08 13:56:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-12-13 11:58:33+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn fww=yes?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7041771427
N9713 (2019-12-13 14:52:40+00:00): Tippfehler, sollte fee=yes heißen. Ist korrigiert.
eggie (2019-12-08 14:27:34+00:00): Dag DenDeV.. In Nederland wordt op de adresnodes bijgetagd. Dus niet op het gebouw zelf.
Voeg dan ook toe
club=scout
De naam svp van het gebouw halen. 
club =scout rendert momenteel niet, maar daar schijn aan gewerkt te worden. 
MVG,
eggie
DenDeV (2019-12-08 14:45:18+00:00): Dag eggie,
Dank voor je opmerking. Nog niet veel mapping in NL gedaan. Ik had het naastgelegen gebouw als voorbeeld genomen :) zojuist gecorrigeerd.  Grtz. Den
eggie (2019-12-08 14:55:06+00:00): Den..als iets niet rendert ..maar we vindbaar is.. gaan mappers het op een andere manier doen.. vooralsnog alleen namen op gebouwen zetten als het de naam van het bouwwerk is.. paleizen.. kerken. E.d
Mapse verder
Eggie
Kovoschiz (2019-12-08 15:05:26+00:00): Please don't delete disused APM station.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78110440
Leo Slager (2019-12-08 23:56:38+00:00): En door het samenvoegen van deze ways zijn de busroutes beschadigd.
Als er routerelaties over wegen lopen, dan nooit zomaar wegen samenvoegen !
Leo Slager (2019-12-09 00:01:07+00:00): Ook bij de rotonde Rijnland/Parnassialaan is de busroute beschadigd. Hier door het verkeerd intekenen van de Z wegen naar de rotonde en het verkeerd opknippen van de rotonde.
aceman444 (2019-12-13 06:49:59+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za pridanie domov v Stupave. Aj ked obkreslovat ich podla Bingu nie je velmi presne, na Slovensku mame aj presnejsie/novsie zdroje ako napr. ESRI alebo ZBGIS (pozrite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Slovakia/Sources).
A prosim davajte pozor na znacku building=house, ktora je len vseobecna na "obydlie pre zhruba jednu rodinu". Na samostatne rodinne domy (ktore ste pridali) je presnejsia znacka building=detached.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-04-09 18:29:43+00:00): motor_vehicle=permissive - are you sure that anyone is allowed to drive there?
ZldYe (2021-04-10 09:38:07+00:00): Hi! Thanks for correcting this. For a correctly mapped, finished TBC Tunnel, please visit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/633116268
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-04-10 14:35:24+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/753693763 also existing?
ZldYe (2021-04-11 09:18:08+00:00): Yes, it is! See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFWZWDqyV2I
dekatherm (2019-12-08 15:37:44+00:00): Hi JRThomas,
if you think that a feature is mistagged you may retag it, but in no case it's justified to delete any real features for your personal advantage.
JRThomas30788 (2019-12-08 15:43:56+00:00): Please look at other areas that are mapped and compare with edited area. You will notice this does not match if other parts Residential areas.
JRThomas30788 (2019-12-08 15:46:24+00:00): Also show another area mapped like this that isn't Birmingham or the West Midlands Area. This does not match what other people are mapping.
trigpoint (2019-12-09 12:40:07+00:00): JRThomas
Please do not do this. OSM is an evolving project, when I started 12 years ago were happy to just have roads mapped. As the project has evolved mappers will add more detail. The detail here was not wrong and you have destroyed other mappers work, which they have spent time on. This is not the way we build a community.
Removing a feature because one particular renderer cannot handle it is not the way forward, but if oomap cannot handle these features you should raise a ticket with the developers or find an application that works.

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

The West Midlands has a long established community and for many things they are ahead of other areas, this is just one example where they are ahead of others.

Please try to work with what is mapped, but please do not simply destroy other mappers work because your renderer

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2019-12-09 12:43:54+00:00): Also please explain what doesn't work? OOmap simply renders gardens as orange, as these are private what functionallity is lost?

Cheers Phil
JRThomas30788 (2019-12-09 13:10:18+00:00): For Orienteering, Yellow/Orange is classed as open areas which private gardens are clearly not. I suggest having I look in Oomap yourself and see what you think. I will not do anymore work.
Richard (2019-12-09 13:12:38+00:00): thank **** for that
trigpoint (2019-12-09 13:24:40+00:00): Your issue here is with OOMap, which is just one rendering of OSM of which there are many.
The tagging here was correct, these areas were tagged as access=private, Maybe the rendering on OOMap should be corrected to take into account the private tags and render accordingly.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2019-12-09 19:04:51+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted in https://www.osm.org/changeset/78166466
Ollie (2019-12-10 14:20:22+00:00): Just got alerted to this by both Jerry and JRThomas. Yes, this is a fix for me to make in my rendering rules on OOMap, I shouldn't be treating leisure=garden like leisure=park. 

PHil - AFAIK there aren't access=private on many of the affected areas by the way - it would be great if there were, however it is also reasonable to assume that gardens are private already unless otherwise indicated.
JRThomas30788 (2019-12-10 17:27:16+00:00): All,

I would very much like to apologise for my actions. I understand now a lot of effort has been put into mapping the area the way it is and therefore I'm truly Sorry.
Hope this doesn't effect my position putting in map updates going forwards.
trigpoint (2019-12-10 19:24:20+00:00): Apologies accepted. 

I did spot that you had also added some footpaths, which I did not revert and are very useful features. Please continue adding things to the map.

Cheers Phil
!bm (2019-12-09 17:36:10+00:00): Hallo famosm! Wieso entfernst du die name-Tags? So auch hier bei zweien: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77485826 – was hat es damit auf sich? Gibt es diese nicht mehr, wie jenen, den ich nach deinem Cs (auf)suchte und nicht mehr fand: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/912003198 – orientiert habe ich mich dabei an anderen, nicht mehr vorhandenen P(l)umpen – pump=no: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/OPu . Ob der Brunnenschacht selbst nicht mehr vorhanden ist, lässt/ließ sich evt/ nicht eruieren. --besteGrüße!bm
famosm (2019-12-11 20:51:35+00:00): Hi bm,
ich habe die name-Tags zufällig entdeckt und für einen Fehler gehalten. Habe dann später entdeckt, dass dies ein vorgeschlagenes tagging Schema vom Wiki ist und dort eine Diskussion gestartet:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE_talk:Berliner_Stra%C3%9Fenbrunnen

Grüße!
Supaplex030 (2020-01-13 14:33:43+00:00): Hallo! Bin gerade erst auf die Diskussion gestoßen. Es gibt ein mit dem name-Tagging verbundenes Problem, was ich in der Diskussion im Wiki geschildert habe. Auch auf der Berliner Mailingliste habe ich gerade etwas dazu rumgeschickt. Finde das name-Tagging aber grundsätzlich auch unglücklich und bin gespannt, was sich ergibt. --beste Grüße!
Supaplex030 (2020-01-13 14:41:09+00:00): P.S. Den "loc_name"-Tag ("Plumpe") finde ich allerdings legitim, da diese Bezeichnung für diese spezifischen Objekte tatsächlich existiert. Diesen würde ich auch gern wieder in den Tagging-Vorschlag aufnehmen. Wenn es dazu Bauchschmerzen gibt, lässt sich das aber sicher auch gut im Wiki klären (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Names).
TXBG (2019-12-08 16:58:46+00:00): Vidim da si nov pa da ti dam kratko objašnjenje. Trenutno je u Srbiji aktuelno ažuriranje adresnog registra i mnogim ulicama je promenjen naziv. To je slučaj i sa ovom ulicom. Verovatno nisi obratio pažnju na to da svi objekti u ovoj ulici imaju tag addr:street=Николе Симића. Tvoja izmena bi učinila nemogućom pretragu tih adresa. Takođe si upisao nepostojeći tag name:Serbian, a pravilan name:sr obrisao. Molim te za početak poseti: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Serbia
Pozdrav
deuzeffe (2019-12-25 22:42:10+00:00): Bonjour,

Je vois que vous avez modifié le NRO d'Aixe-sur-Vienne, en rajoutant des données redondantes ("nom du NRO", ville et postcode). Vous n'auriez-pas sa référence ?
msajadi824 (2019-12-08 15:09:25+00:00): تعمیرات ساعت آقای علی زمانی ثانی
chnav (2019-12-08 16:54:02+00:00): откачено
trigpoint (2019-12-09 19:05:21+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted in https://www.osm.org/changeset/78166466
PierZen (2020-03-12 18:51:46+00:00): Merci de collaborer à OSM. Pour mieux tracer ce bâtiment, il faut zoomer suffisamment et suivre les contours le plus près possible. Dans iD, il y a aussi un bouton pour rendre le bâtiment rectangulaire.
gendy54 (2019-12-10 20:02:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Il faut supprimer tous les hôtels que vous avez mis sur chaque bâtiment et créer une zone.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Un_item.2C_un_objet_OSM

Je vous laisse corriger
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78112860
gendy54 (2019-12-10 20:04:24+00:00): le tag amenity=parking est celui qui convient le mieux, à moins que ce ne soit des places réservées: livraisons, handicapés...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78112990
gendy54 (2019-12-10 20:07:26+00:00): En regardant les changements suivants, je confirme. Il s'agit d'un parking global, il faut le mapper dans tout son emprise et indiquer le nb de places totale.
Vous pouvez en profiter pour rajouter les voies de parking
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78112990
gendy54 (2019-12-10 20:10:52+00:00): Les tags addr:city et postcode sont inutiles en France
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78113397
gendy54 (2019-12-10 20:11:46+00:00): Voir commentaire sur l'hôtel: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Un_item.2C_un_objet_OSM
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78113498
ma-rt-in (2019-12-09 10:48:49+00:00): Hallo.
bitte überprüfe deine Tags die du gesetzt hast. Du hast zum Teil ein doppeltaaging produziert!
vg
Omegatherion (2019-12-15 18:13:18+00:00): Könntest du etwas genauer sein? Wo habe ich welches doppeltagging produziert?
ma-rt-in (2019-12-15 18:53:35+00:00): Hallo,
es geht um Way 5410181:
Dort findet sich acces:lanes=yes|psv auf dem weg, jedoch gibt es kein access=psv, da so nicht vorgesehen. Zudem hast hat der weg ein vehicle=no und noch andere beschränkende Tag´s. Was genau ist den da vor Ort beschilder?
vg
Discostu36 (2019-12-15 21:27:22+00:00): Ich habe das Tagging angepasst entsprechend der Informationen, die die Stadt Kiel auf https://www.kiel.de/de/umwelt_verkehr/baustellen.php zur Verfügung stellt. Gerne nochmal vor Ort überprüfen. Muss wahrscheinlich auch noch bis zur Ringstraße weitergeführt werden, die Sperrung.
skquinn (2019-12-10 00:41:15+00:00): Is this just the species of tree or does this refer to a tree belonging to/used as a meeting place for a club? If the former, there is a different way to tag this besides name/description (though natural=tree still applies).
davisclay (2019-12-10 18:38:45+00:00): Species
M!dgard (2019-12-08 23:50:40+00:00): Dag cpu20, bij telefoonnummers graag ook de landcode zetten:

+32 477 86 60 87 ipv 0477 86 60 87

Groetjes, M!dgard
gendy54 (2019-12-09 19:44:16+00:00): Bonjour,

Si les chemins sont goudronnés, vous pouvez même rajoute le tag surface=asphalt ;)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78113951
ma-rt-in (2019-12-08 21:03:53+00:00): Hallo,
wie ich sehe nutzt du ALKIS der Stadt. Diese Quelle ist NICHT freigegeben für OSM! Bitte drauf achten.
Des Weiteren hast du Way 696984452 gelöscht, wo durch das haupttag für Gebäude weg war und nur noch builing:parts=* vorhanden war, das habe ich wieder revertet.

vg
Hjart (2019-12-08 22:28:51+00:00): Jeg har ændret bommen fra en linje til et punkt på stien, da den ellers ikke vil fungere i forhold til navigation
eggie (2019-12-08 18:13:23+00:00): Welkom bij OSM
Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
Wulf4096 (2019-12-08 18:48:59+00:00): Hallo,

Schuko liefert laut Betreiberwebseite nur 2.6 kW:
https://www.e-charging-hamburg.de/fragen-und-antworten/
Sonst hättest du ja 22000 / 230 = 96A auf einer ganz normalen Steckdose.

Woher weißt du, dass dort 44 kW insgesamt zur Verfügung stehen? Vielleicht hat die Säule selbst keinen so dicken Stromanschluss und zwei Fahrzeuge müssten sich den teilen?
Kiezkneipe (2019-12-08 19:47:31+00:00): Hallo Wulf,
die Säule hat laut HmbTG-Anfrage eine Gesamtleistung von 44kW: https://fragdenstaat.de/anfrage/ubersicht-e-ladepunkte/433504/anhang/Ladesaeulenkarte_Datenbankauszug_SNH_Okt_2019.xlsx

Leider ist mir ein Fehler bei den Sockets unterlaufen: Die Säule hat zwei Seiten mit je einem Anschluss "Typ2" und einem Schuko. Jede Seite hat eine Maximalleistung von 22kW (vermutlich dann für Typ2), nicht jedoch (wie ich falsch eingetragen habe) jeder Anschluss.

Vielen Dank für's Bescheid geben, ich korrigiere das.
LG Fiesian
Wulf4096 (2019-12-09 06:00:25+00:00): Die Daten stehen unter der Lizenz "CC BY 4.0" (siehe https://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/DE/Sachgebiete/ElektrizitaetundGas/Unternehmen_Institutionen/HandelundVertrieb/Ladesaeulenkarte/Ladesaeulenkarte_node.html) und sind somit ohne Sondergenehmigung leider nicht für OSM nutzbar: https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/
Kiezkneipe (2019-12-09 13:06:53+00:00): Oh, ärgerlich. Ist entfernt.
viloan (2019-12-08 17:37:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-12-08 18:07:58+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Luzandro (2019-12-15 10:17:17+00:00): path ist für nicht motorisierten Verkehr, also ist wohl eher service passend
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=path
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78115364
alphensebezorger (2019-12-08 19:03:12+00:00): horse=no lijkt mij een vergissing?
GPX Speedtag (2019-12-08 20:54:11+00:00): Nee bordt C1 geldt ook voor ruiters, oftewel paarden.

Horse staat niet onder vehicle maar onder de access groep.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Land-based_transportation
alphensebezorger (2019-12-08 21:01:17+00:00): Sorry, ik had moeten zeggen "horse:conditional=no@(...)” lijkt een vergissing, want er staat al horse=no bij. Oftewel er staat nu: verboden voor ruiters, behalve doordeweeks voor 11:00 of na 18:00, dan is het... ook verboden voor ruiters.
alphensebezorger (2019-12-17 23:00:26+00:00): Ik probeer nog een keer uit te leggen waarom de tagging hier volgens mij nog altijd niet klopt.
Ik ben met je eens dat bord C1 ook voor ruiters geldt, maar ook het onderbord geldt voor hen. De tag horse=no is goed, maar er staat nu:
horse:conditional=no@(Mo-Fr 00:00-11:00, 18:00-24:00). Hier zou volgens mij "no" door "yes" vervangen moeten worden.
pio2_122 (2019-12-08 22:09:39+00:00): Połączyłeś linię energetyczną ze ścieżką w https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7042212443 - mógłbyś to rozłączyć?
viloan (2019-12-08 18:38:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Oleksandr Radchenko (2019-12-08 20:14:55+00:00): Добрый вечер! Есть вопрос по редактированию карты в этом месте. Справа от детской музыкальной школы я добавил разделительную линию и справа указал отделение Укрпошты 27602, там оно реально находится. Но оно не отображается.
user_2392943 (2019-12-08 21:18:55+00:00): 1. Не нужно наносить три отдельных полигона. Так у вас вышло три здания, а не три организации.
2. Почта не отобразилась, так как вы её неправильно нанесли.

Сейчас нанесено один полигон здания с единой адресной информацией, а поверх полигона три точки, сельсовет, музыкальная школа, почта.
Gazer75 (2020-01-21 08:47:17+00:00): Why did you set Dalavegen and parts of Austefjordvegen as tertiary? Do this road have scheduled bus routes? If not then it is not a tertiary.
Gazer75 (2020-01-21 08:48:21+00:00): I see you've set several branch roads as tertiary. This is not correct unless it has scheduled bus routes.
cck (2020-01-21 09:56:14+00:00): Hei Gazer75. Bus routes are specified using relations in OSM. highway=* is just for the road class. highway=tertiary is used for any kind of local artery.

Cities do tend to use such roads for bus routes, but that does *not* mean that all roads without bus service aren't arteries. In fact, just looking inside Oslo's Ring 2, I see lots of tertiary roads without bus service. These are not tagging mistakes: Bus service is an indication that a road *probably* is an artery, but the reverse is simply not true. In rural districts all the more so, as those tend to have much worse public transport than cities do.

IMHO this is well documented in <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Norway/Highways#Road_classes>.

Do you have local knowledge in Ølve and Hatlestrand?

In this particular case, the road from Husa towards Sunnfjord very clearly is the (relatively) most important municipal road in Ølve today. It is also historically the oldest road in Ølve and today a shortcut towards Fv549 towards Nordtveit. The latter means it has a road network function, which is a rarity for branch roads in Hardanger because of its topography. IMHO, there can be little doubt that this road in fact is a local artery – especially in Norway, where national practice as per the wiki doesn't take road quality into account when classifying roads, which is not always the case internationally in OSM.

(I already mentioned part of this reasoning briefly in <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64027034>.)

Now, as for the roads to Skarvatun and Ask – I'm on the fence for those. See <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64027034> for my original reasoning there, which may well have been faulty.

Hilsen, cck
cck (2020-01-21 10:02:48+00:00): Sorry, this is the correct cs link for Dalavegen: <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64026899>
Gazer75 (2020-01-21 11:19:49+00:00): Please read the wiki for Norway. Tertiary is used for roads with scheduled bus routes.
Making local/rural municipal roads tertiary will cause through traffic that should not be there. It is valued quite high in most routing software.
These roads are not wide enough to really support large vehicles.

Road class is not based on quality for secondary and up to avoid a complete mess.
cck (2020-01-21 11:43:31+00:00): I did give you the link to the wiki page for Norway, and that's not what it says at all.

Have you actually read it?

Tagging roads with lower classes than they in fact should have is basically "tagging for the renderer". We try to avoid that in OSM. If routing software doesn't take into account the physical characteristics of roads, such as surface=* and width=*, then that's clearly a bug in the routing software.

As I said in the changeset tags: In OSM, we map facts on the ground.

Besides, routing software for large vehicles such as semi trailers *must*  take into the legal restrictions set by Vegvesenet. (If you speak Norwegian, the search terms are "vegliste" / "bruksklasse".) But that kind of data changes all the time, so it isn't really useful to include in OSM.