piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
luschi (2018-06-06 16:08:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41887700
Wieso hast du hier die Nummer im Name hinzugefügt?
     
Nummer 24 ist bereits in der ref erfasst und im namen falsch und überflüssig!
Pathumthani (2018-06-06 17:30:17+00:00): 1.) Kann keinen  Zusammenhang zwischen Kartenausschnitt und Changeset erkennen
2.)  Mir ist keine Quelle bekannt, wo das als falsch bezeichnet wird.
3.) Die Offline-App. Maps.me kann keine Relation verarbeiten, sondern nur die von mir vorgenommene Darstellung.
luschi (2018-06-06 18:13:10+00:00): Link war ein Kopierfehler von mir.     
Gemeint ist logischerweise der Name des Meraner Höhenwegs den du hier geändert hast.     
Die Nummer gehört in die `ref` und ausschließlich der Name gehört in `name`!     
Zur Quelle: `ref` oder auch `Names` der OSM-Wiki     
Zitat ref: wird verwendet um die üblichen Nummern bei Elementen einzutragen.          
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ref?uselang=de      
Zitat Names: Die Namen sollten nur den eigentlichen Namen des fraglichen Objekts enthalten und keine Kategorien / Typen, Beschreibungen, Adressen oder Anmerkungen enthalten. Jegliche über den Namen hinausgehenden Informationen sollten in gesonderten Tags (siehe unter anderem vorstehende Links) eingetragen werden, um ihre Bedeutungen zum Ausdruck zu bringen.     
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name      

Zu 3: Das ist mappen für den Renderer wie es im Buche steht.     
Dass eine App die Relations nicht unterstützt ist kein ausreichender Grund um OSM-Daten zu verfälschen.
Hier solltest du den Support von maps.me kontaktieren oder auf eine andere App umsteigen die Relations von Wanderwegen unterstützen.     

lg

PS: Wenn du diese Mail in deinen Posteingang bekommst, ist ganz unten, unter den grau hinterlegten Block der Link zu dieser Diskussion.
ralley (2017-09-27 16:49:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.  Strange but correct that the road is Green Lane while the suburb is Greenlane.  Well spotted.
Seraphle (2017-09-26 19:00:43+00:00): correction du commentaire su changeset : sil s'agit de Veules-les-Roses et non de Roumare
NonnEmilia (2017-09-27 08:38:17+00:00): Ciao Coldfear, ho visto che hai cambiato le `barrier=lift_gate` in `landuse=military`; `military=checkpoint` ("Posto di controllo" nell'editor iD, ma `military=checkpoint` va usato solamente per posti di guardia controllati da forze di polizia o militari (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:military%3Dcheckpoint), non per le aziende private. In questo caso è più corretto fare come hai fatto con l'ingresso a nord: mettere sulla strada il `barrier=lift_gate` con `access=permissive` o ancora meglio `access=private` (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access). Buon mapping!
coldfear (2017-09-28 03:45:35+00:00): E vero. Grazie mille.
imagico (2017-10-01 14:21:49+00:00): Bonjour abdeldjalil,

i am sorry for missing the existing mountain region polygon.

However the tagging is still quite wrong since in the area covered exposed bedrock is not the dominating surface type.  Most of this area is covered by loose material - mostly either scree or alluvial deposits - like here: https://mc.bbbike.org/mc/?lon=8.069623&lat=25.976448&zoom=14&num=3&mt0=bing-satellite&mt1=mapnik&mt2=google-satellite

Exposed bedrock is mostly limited to steep parts where relief prevents accumulation of loose material.

Having such a big polygon covering a very heterogeneous area makes it difficult for mappers to correctly map details more specifically on a local level.

Merci,

Christoph
gurglypipe (2017-09-27 10:02:31+00:00): I think you might need to route the sidewalk into the crossing island with a footway=crossing (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dcrossing).
John-O (2017-09-27 16:44:28+00:00): Changed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52418986. Does that seem ok. The other side of the road, the pavement is immediately adjacent to the road
gurglypipe (2017-09-27 16:52:21+00:00): I think that’s right, yes.
marc__marc (2019-04-04 23:35:05+00:00): Hello,
about :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5131573975
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5131573974
horse=* is an acces key, so it's better to avoid horse=mounting block
maybe it's better to change it into man_made=mounting_block
Regards,
Marc
dudone (2019-04-07 17:52:42+00:00): Hi Marc

There is actually a proposal at the moment for this tag.  One of the options is horse=mounting_block but as you suggest it would seem horse is an access tag.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/mounting_block

I have changed it to man_made=mounting_block but it might need changing again soon.
Regards

Dudley
marc__marc (2019-04-07 18:51:08+00:00): yes, we are talking about this propal on the tagging mailing. it's why I have checked and write to the few mapper who have used horse=* to have one less problem in the proposal :-)
Thanks for the change !
Regards,
Marc
gurglypipe (2017-09-27 09:59:12+00:00): Nice work, but careful with roof shapes. It’s a slippery slope towards doing the wall colours and drives and hedges and individual flower beds. :-P
naoliv (2017-09-26 23:00:44+00:00): Gabriel, não podemos copiar dados do Google, Bing, Here, Maplink ou qualquer outro mapa comercial que não possuimos permissão.
Inclusive essa é a mensagem que vemos ao enviar as modificações ao mapa: https://i.imgur.com/YQbG6z8.png
Caso queira inserir nomes de ruas de forma lícita, podemos utilizar os dados do IBGE.
No editor que você utiliza você pode apertar a tecla "B" (ou clicar no quarto ícone, de cima para baixo, da barra da direita) e escolher a camada "IBGE Mapa de Setores Urbanos"
Copiar dados sem autorização apenas traz prejuízo ao projeto.
mavl (2017-09-27 11:22:24+00:00): Gabriel iTer. This changeset uses the data of Google (copyrighted data). These data are deleted.  
  
(tradução automática)  
  
Gabriel iTer. Este conjunto de mudanças usa os dados do Google (dados protegidos por direitos autorais). Esses dados são excluídos.  
  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Perguntas_frequentes]
bkil (2018-01-07 15:12:15+00:00): You've removed the layer of the running path on top of Köki and tagged it inside. We do not know what 'inside' means, because there is no wiki page for it. Note that the path is not inside the building, it is on top of the building (and anyway, the whole park and playground is on top, not just this single path). You have also seem to removed the path that goes through the park. Please clarify, otherwise I will have to revert your edits.
Владимир К (2017-10-10 10:31:50+00:00): пятерочка уже обозначена на здании
4004 (2017-09-27 09:21:57+00:00): Здравствуйте и спасибо за вклад в развитие карты.
Ваши правки пешеходных дорожек похоже не имеют проблем, но вот смена полевой дороги на местную, пожалуй, неправильна - ознакомьтесь https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=tertiary . Если даже дорога со времен снимка была заасфальтирована, она все еще не теняет на местную, а скорее на проезд
eggie (2017-09-26 20:58:24+00:00): TW van de carpool zie ik volgens mij geen landuse tag meer staan. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52396246
bikebd review (2017-09-26 20:07:36+00:00): http://www.bikebd.review/
StephaneP (2017-10-15 08:52:39+00:00): Bonjour marco443,
N'oublie pas que tu peux utiliser l'imagerie aérienne de l'Ign, elle est de bien meilleure qualité que celle de Bing. https://openstreetmap.fr/bdortho

A+
Cyclono (2017-09-26 22:47:00+00:00): Hey, waarom is de weg van classification veranderd?
Cyclono (2017-09-26 22:53:46+00:00): Oh het is van secondary naar primary road veranderd. Ok Prima
josq (2017-10-16 18:11:07+00:00): ja Maasboulevard is een van belangrijkste invalroutes natuurlijk
literan (2017-09-27 12:08:11+00:00): приветствую! place=suburb - он для названий районов (в том числе исторических), которые употребляются сейчас. Для тех, что остались в прошлом (как и для прочих исторических объектов) надо применять historic=suburb (или historic=neighbourhood), например, как здесь http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4864098332
Sanniu (2017-10-10 06:29:31+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527949355 - is it roundabout?
Flayer (2017-10-10 18:20:44+00:00): yes
Sanniu (2017-10-11 11:09:01+00:00): Thx, fixed
GerdP (2017-09-27 05:47:38+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you used highway=crossing for a way here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527949637
and here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527949648
The tag is onöy meant for the node shared by a minor way (footway, cycleway) with a major road. I assume you used it accidentially here?
xolrax (2017-09-27 12:50:04+00:00): Yes, I'll correct it. Thank you.
indigomc (2017-09-28 17:18:21+00:00): Reverted.
Cyclono (2017-09-26 20:46:03+00:00): changeset opslaan over heel rotterdam was per ongeluk, het gaat over een klein gebied aan de eendrachtsweg in het centrum van rotterdam.
sorry..
mueschel (2017-10-01 10:58:35+00:00): Hi,
is there a difference between disabled_motor_vehicle and disabled_vehicle, or do they describe the same category?
Jan
Allroads (2017-10-01 12:44:26+00:00): The hierarchy is disabled_vehicle, then subcategory  disabled_ motor_ vehicle,  
The wiki is not completed but C9 C15, disabled_vehicle, C13 disabled_motor_vehicle ( not a moped), C14, new key needed. Subcatergory, should be a not motorized disabled vehicle as a key ( i do not have yet found a logic key, disabled_non _motor_vehicle, which is not a wheelchair, this could be motorized.)

Traffic_sign (law) makes the difference,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden#C:_Geslotenverklaring

How I come to this, working on a JOSM style and a possible preset.
http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/JOSM/Styles/Road_extended_JOSM_style_info.html
mueschel (2017-10-01 13:47:28+00:00): Alright, I wasn't sure if this difference was a mistake or on purpose.
Thanks, Jan
ralley (2017-09-27 16:42:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for the correction.  Looks fine to me.
ralley (2017-09-27 16:37:21+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding the walkway but I don't think this should be tagged as footway=crossing and crossing=zebra (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing)
Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (2017-09-26 21:34:33+00:00): Przepraszam - zapomniałem się przelogować po edycji profilu.
Mateusz Konieczny - bot account (2017-09-26 21:34:29+00:00): Przepraszam - zapomniałem się przelogować po edycji profilu.
Constable (2019-06-13 07:18:38+00:00): Ciao stefano, con questa modifica hai inserito la sterrata https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527960384 , ma perché è etichettata come access=no ? significa che l'accesso non è consentito a nessuno (a parte bici e pedoni perché specificato da foot=yes e bicycle=yes) e mi sembra strano. Volevi indicare che l'accesso non è consentito ai veicoli?
grazie, ciao!
lfemak (2017-09-26 21:22:31+00:00): comment corretion:

"-way an Relation Rhön-Rennsteig-Radweg."
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:09:11+00:00): Hello VLD007. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527960887 you have tagged `laye` instead of `layer`, right? #typo
VLD007 (2017-09-28 17:15:22+00:00): Hello Harald. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I corrected the spelling mistake. Happy Mapping! 
-Kurt
Beddhist (2018-12-28 07:47:54+00:00): Way 527960878: another unclassified road that in reality is a muddy, bumpy goat track.

When will Facebook start to review all these old edits?
Fischkopp0815 (2017-09-27 04:24:28+00:00): Du hast hier einige Straßen zum verkehrsberuhigten Bereich gemacht. So ein Bereich ist durch das Schild DE:325 gekennzeichnet.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Zeichen_325.1_-_Beginn_eines_verkehrsberuhigten_Bereichs,_StVO_2013.svg
Ich war vor einigen Wochen in der Gegend und habe nichts davon gesehen. Hat sich das geändert? Wenn ja, dann entferne bitte noch das maxspeed=30 von den betreffenden Straßen. Das gibt es dann nicht mehr. Ansonsten bitte auf highway=residential zurückändern.
FFB Admin (2017-10-04 18:59:18+00:00): Moin! Ich ändere das wieder zurück. Gruß!
user_5359 (2017-09-27 19:03:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For your main concern: Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/FAQ

Probably the definition of neighbourhood is missing.
5m4u9 (2017-09-27 06:06:03+00:00): en este cambio, borras bien el area residencial, pero tengo la duda si "mallasilla" es un barrio o algo así?

podríamos restitutir un puntito de tipo barrio con ese nombre,,, para que no pierdan la referencia
Caleidoscopic (2017-09-27 17:02:46+00:00): Es un barrio, pongo el punto ahora mismo. Gracias por el seguimiento.
Caleidoscopic (2017-09-27 17:09:06+00:00): ya estaba el puntito :D
osm-sputnik (2017-09-27 19:27:16+00:00): Hi,

first of all, thanks for the height import in Nice. This is very helpful for me because we estimate the floor space of each building from the building polygon and the height (either in meters or in number of stories). This data is used for risk assessments for natural catastrophes (e.g. earthquakes). 

I have been looking into the results of this import so far and I found a small region in the northeastern part of the import area where apparently something must have gone wrong. Please see this area:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/43.7590/7.3039

On our website, on which we display the floor space per building, you can see that the majority of the buildings have too large floor spaces (red color). I have checked several of them and they report heights of more than 400m, which I have to assume is wrong. See our display (please be patient, it is slow):

http://www.openbuildingmap.org/#zoom=17&lat=43.76105&lon=7.30284&layers=B00FFFFTFFF

Again, your contribution is great and I hope to see more of this data coming to OSM.

Cheers
osm-sputnik (2017-09-27 19:46:05+00:00): Hi,

You can nicely see the too tall buildings here:

https://osmbuildings.org/?lat=43.75733&lon=7.29973&zoom=15.2&tilt=30
VinceFromNice (2017-09-27 20:57:18+00:00): Indeed on that small area the DTM file has no value but the DSM has.. so the computed height is equal to the elevation of the building ! :)
I will fix soon, manually I think.
Thanks a lot for your report.
Regards, Vincent.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-27 00:12:28+00:00): If you want to perform a mechanical edit on OSM data then, as pointed out previously, you need to follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .  You are not doing this.
nyuriks (2017-09-27 00:15:08+00:00): SomeoneElse, I think you are not being fair or impartial.  I have reviewed every single change in this edit - they are done manually, one by one, not mechanically. This is very different from massive wikidata tag upload.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-27 00:33:42+00:00): I'd spend a few more characters spent in the comment explaining what you're doing would be helpful, not just "found with tinyurl" (link does not load for me; presumably it needs Javascript).
Explain what the problem is - for example in the case of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4807083811/history it was a wikidata link that you added in error because there was a wikipedia link from this tree to the "species of tree" wikipedia page, and that you're changing that to use species:wikidata, which according to https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=wikidata is the most popular way of expressing that concept.
Also say that while you're not familiar with each individual tree you're trusting the previous mappers that they've got the species correct and that you're sanity checking each object that you're changing.
If you don't say this people will assume that you're not checking each change, because in your previous edit to e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4807083811/history you didn't.
nyuriks (2017-09-27 00:38:14+00:00): Thanks, this is a valid feedback. I should make my comments more detailed.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-28 16:32:24+00:00): Hello Raulvior. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527673726 and around, you have tagged `turn:lanes:left=diagonal` .. did you mean `parking:lane:left=diagonal` instead?! #typo
Raulvior (2017-09-28 17:51:01+00:00): Yes. I meant "parking:lane:left=diagonal". I am uploading a new changeset correcting the mistake and adding the parking:condition information.
Raulvior (2017-09-28 17:53:25+00:00): Changes made and uploaded: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52453299
user_5359 (2019-11-29 07:11:55+00:00): Hello! Short question to this change set. You add a tag handicap, which is defined for a golf course to the bus relation https://www.osm.org/relation/5560216. What is your interpretation of this tag?
Shawn Noble (2019-11-30 05:47:14+00:00): I used the incorrect tag in creating this. Thank you for noting the error. I will correct the error.
Athalis (2017-09-28 20:41:44+00:00): this changeset has been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52457364
SomeoneElse (2017-09-27 01:09:56+00:00): Er - not only does https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4792387396 not have a Chinese name signed on it the actual name used here ("York Chocolate Factory") is actually incorrect.
SomeoneElse (2017-09-27 01:05:42+00:00): I've never seen any Chinese signage on McArthur Glen York!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56748281
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 15:51:10+00:00): Hello RoadGeek_MD99. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/527989952 you have tagged `constuction` instead of `construction`, right? #typo
RoadGeek_MD99 (2017-09-29 16:06:02+00:00): Hello Harald Hartmann,
Yes, #typo and fixed.  Thanks!
imperialmog (2017-09-27 18:26:43+00:00): I was able to build on the information you placed here. Defined the houses you added with addresses and details along with some additional buildout of the sidewalks and street refinement.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 16:58:55+00:00): deletado. não existe castelo aqui
user_6703715 (2017-09-27 02:47:35+00:00): Just looked at the nursing home, shouldn't it be mapped to the area of the building and not a node?
Minh Nguyen (2017-09-27 05:18:06+00:00): This changeset missed a few duplicate features that had gotten joined to preexisting features in changeset 52372799. The remaining duplicate features were removed in changeset 52402863.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 13:30:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52730957 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed removal of wikipedia=* tags from ways because it is semi-mechanical and/or the user lacks of enough knowledge in the topics and regions he edited.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 13:30:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52730957 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed removal of wikipedia=* tags from ways because it is semi-mechanical and/or the user lacks of enough knowledge in the topics and regions he edited.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 13:30:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52730957 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed removal of wikipedia=* tags from ways because it is semi-mechanical and/or the user lacks of enough knowledge in the topics and regions he edited.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 13:30:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52730957 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed removal of wikipedia=* tags from ways because it is semi-mechanical and/or the user lacks of enough knowledge in the topics and regions he edited.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 13:30:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52730957 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed removal of wikipedia=* tags from ways because it is semi-mechanical and/or the user lacks of enough knowledge in the topics and regions he edited.
Minh Nguyen (2017-09-27 05:11:02+00:00): Some of changeset 52313882 was omitted from this reversion due to intervening edits; these ways were deleted in changeset 52402863.
aharvey (2017-09-28 07:46:27+00:00): Similar to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/18260888 I've added some extra tags to your SLSC's.
huonw (2017-09-29 00:47:36+00:00): Oh, awesome, didn't realise they existed!
raito (2017-09-28 05:38:46+00:00): #reverts required. My internet is too slow at the moment to fix this. Also only started to read about how to use the Reverter plugin, so best I don't touch these.
Ms Kiara (2017-09-29 02:53:06+00:00): Thanks for contribute..
user_5359 (2017-09-27 18:56:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
I must deleted also your node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
nyuriks (2017-09-27 23:12:56+00:00): Hi, please add wikidata tags when adding wikipedia. JOSM can do it automatically using "Fetch IDs" in Wikipedia plugin.  Also, please help with https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Link_Improvement_Project if you can. Thanks!
freebeer (2020-03-04 20:47:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81792222 where the changeset comment is: delete a maps.me wilderness hut inna big city
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:49:46+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:19:15+00:00): Hello 51114u9. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4050476 you have tagged `intermitent` instead of `intermittent`, right? #typo
5m4u9 (2017-09-29 17:55:31+00:00): yes, typo error
flohoff (2017-09-27 14:15:35+00:00): Hi,
ich habe gerade diesen Changeset gesehen und mir ist der "name=Teststrecke" ins Auge gesprungen. Das ist ja eine beschreibende Nutzung des "name" tags. Das sollte so nicht sein. Das IST ja eine Teststrecke - Die heisst ja nicht so. D.h. das sollte aus dem Name tag raus.

Flo
mavl (2017-09-27 12:48:27+00:00): О каком именно участке дороги идёт речь?  
  
На какой улице поворот с правой полосы разрешён только направо? И на какую улицу? Вероятно, со второй полосы можно проехать прямо и проблемы быть не должно. Многие навигаторы не учитывают движение по полосам.  
  
Где много проблем? В каком-то конкретном навигаторе?
mavl (2017-09-27 13:01:47+00:00): Раздвоение улицы Дорожников привело к тому, что некоторые ограничения движения (запреты поворота) были нарушены. Также не нужно раздваивать улицы в конце (мы не обозначаем каждую колею на перекрёстке). Это обычный Т-образный перекрёсток.  
  
Я пока отменил этот пакет правок, чтобы восстановить отношения. Так, наверное, будет проще разобраться, что нужно изменить.
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-29 17:42:54+00:00): Hello bhavana naga. At http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/59399596 you have tagged `ref_left` instead of `ref:left`, right? #typo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-17 13:05:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53011130 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names that appear to have been copied from a Russian library book.  See block 1591 and changeset 52420815 for the attempt to find out licence details (or where the names may be verified).
maxerickson (2017-09-27 16:45:10+00:00): Hi-

It does not work in iD, but the Puerto Rico OSM community has a server with the major road network for the island: 

http://geoserver.prosmap.org:80/geoserver/prosmap/wms

If possible you should refer to this imagery before upgrading roads to primary/secondary. I've used it to make some adjustments to the roads in this changeset.

Thanks,

Max
r2d (2018-04-02 07:26:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Suite à cette modification plusieurs chemins ne sont plus connectés. Pouvez-vous les remettre en état ? Voir à cette position : https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=45.29874&mlon=5.51705#map=19/45.29874/5.51705 quatre chemins ont été "raccourcis". Merci