piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2020-02-16 16:53:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2020-02-16 17:04:32+00:00): Oke.. Top!
Gr eggie
DaveF (2020-02-19 01:49:04+00:00): Hi
There should only be one railway=station per station. Please keep the node & see wiki about building=train_station & building=roof.
tux67 (2020-02-17 09:41:26+00:00): Hi, ich denke die Building passage ist beim Minto nicht das Mittel der Wahl. Siehe "Wann wird building_passage nicht verwendet":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tunnel?uselang=de#Hausdurchgang
Wir sind eher hier nehme ich an:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcorridor
Wird hier auch mehr oder minder als de facto Standard beschrieben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping#Proposed_Tags
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81077791
user_5359 (2022-04-16 06:57:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772958105. What is the meaning of the tag religion=31?
kartonage (2020-02-16 18:33:34+00:00): Hej EZroute,

I can see no indication that Franklinstraße should have the alternate name "Franklinstrasse" as this is very unusual in Germany. Nor do I know of any reason why this would be the case. Only the 'ß' is the correct notation. 

If you are trying to help your tool, you should probably try to find another way since almost all streets in Germany are with the correct 'ß' notation. Unlike Switzerland & Liechtenstein where the 'ss' is correct.

For reference see the Geoportal Data (https://fbinter.stadt-berlin.de/fb/index.jsp?loginkey=zoomStart&mapId=wmsk_alkis@senstadt&bbox=385681,5819664,387281,5820663) or the street sign (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.522167299972224&lng=13.328247499972221&z=17&pKey=XLWPwSoW8qWDV5pwrJiSmQ&focus=photo&x=0.8297066845227135&y=0.37914538389142116&zoom=3). You may also read up on the official Rechtschreibreform of 2006 if you are so inclined.

Best regards
EZroute (2020-02-16 19:52:07+00:00): Thanks for the comment! I completely agree and support official ways of naming the streets - but how about convenience when you're not native German speaker? For example, Google allows you to search the German streets using 'ss' instead of 'ß' - therefore making non native speakers easier to find the streets. General notation isn't changed, but you can still find the street you're looking for. Therefore making this tool more usable instead of just following the rules and "ordnung".
EZroute (2020-02-16 20:00:54+00:00): One more note regarding use of "ss" - https://rechtschreibrat.com/DOX/rfdr_Regeln_2016_redigiert_2018.pdf - Paragraph 25. Therefore - official rules allows use of double "ss".
EZroute (2020-02-16 20:01:58+00:00): Yes - the last link is from rules from year 2016 while you're referencing to rules from 2006.
kartonage (2020-02-16 20:42:25+00:00): Nominatim, the search engine for OSM, is already capable of doing the same, as in presenting the correct street even when searched by the use of 'ss'. So are a multitude of other tools, routers, etc.
Otherwise a few hundred thousand streets in Germany would have, at some point, raised a few eyebrows.

Just like URL parsing, which isn't limited to German, there are rules for when the 'ß' can not be displayed in a font or character set, which is the paragraph you are referencing. 'Straße' remains the only correct spelling. While still valid in capital letter use, often the small 'ß' is used instead of the 'SS' or the new capital 'ẞ'. All 3 variations aren't relevant in street names in Germany.
eggie (2020-02-16 19:05:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM... I removed duplicated tagging of the restaurant.
We don'nt use name:nl in the  netherlands. 
Greetz, Eggie
andergrin (2020-04-19 19:22:46+00:00): Добрий день. Дякую, що додаєте нову інформацію до мапи. Зверніть увагу, що тег name застосовується лише до назв вулиць в населених пунктах, а не для опису стежок і путівців
pangoSE (2020-02-17 11:47:23+00:00): Välkommen tillbaka!
literan (2020-02-16 19:53:10+00:00): highway=traffic_signals это тег для светофора. Для регулируемого пешеходного перехода надо испольовать highway=crossing+crossing=traffic_signals. Поправлю тут
abrensch (2020-02-23 13:28:56+00:00): Hallo blackovis,

der Kreisel braucht noch junction=roundabout, sonst ist es keiner.

Die gesamte Kreutzungsgeometrie sieht jetzt eher vorläufig aus. Wird da noch gebaut?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
blackovis (2020-02-23 18:30:59+00:00): Hallo Arndt,
danke für den Tipp, das roundabout Tag hatte ich vergessen (war mein erster Kreisverkehr ...).
Der Kreisel ist fertig und in Betrieb. Da wird sich nix mehr ändern. Der "Stummel" der alten Zufahrt ist auch genau so noch vorhanden. Ich vermute, dass wird evtl. noch eine Notausfahrt vom neuen Gewerbegebiet. Derzeit gibt es da noch keine offizielle Verbindung, nur einen Baustellenweg. Ich werde das mal im Auge bahalten.
Gruß,
Martin
pio2_122 (2020-02-16 22:21:05+00:00): Mała uwaga/prośba dot. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7217040345
Dla masztów jest osobny tag: man_made=mast; tower jest dla większych i "solidniejszych" wież.
Niestety, JOSM domyślnie nie ma tego tagu w szablonach (więc zrozumiałe jest to, że zastosowałeś man_made=tower). Na szczęście można je pobrać: W JOSM wystarczy wcisnąć F12, następnie kliknąć w trzecią zakładkę z boku (ikonka "globusu" z siatką geograficzną), później zakładka "Szablony" i z dostępnych wybrać "Communication Towers" lub/i "Towers and masts", a następnie kliknąć na trójkącik między tabelami i kliknąć "OK" - gotowe. Pojawią się wtedy na liście szablonów w głównym oknie. Więcej o tagu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:man_made%3Dmast  (polecam zerknąć też na odnośniki w dziale "Tagi do użycia w połączeniu").
A ogólnie, to dobra robota! :)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81079503
Marwis00 (2020-03-02 20:29:37+00:00): A dla jakich przypadków będzie używany klucz "tower"? Ogólnie w technice jako maszt nazywa się konstrukcję wsporczą która utrzymywana jest przez linowe odciągi (np maszty telewizyjne), wieżą za to konstrukcje "samonośne"
pio2_122 (2020-03-02 20:35:31+00:00): Przykłady z wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tower:type%3Dcommunication#First_question:_Is_it_a_mast_or_a_tower.3F

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tower:type%3Dcommunication#Examples

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:construction

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tower:type
camelCaseNick (2020-02-18 01:11:34+00:00): Hey,
if you use brand:wikidata and no wikipedia article exists in a language you want to tag, I would recommend to omit the brand:wikipedia tag instead of brand:wikipedia=ar:
CamelCaseNick
user_9838430 (2020-02-18 22:23:46+00:00): The iD editor sometimes gives a warning if the "brand:wikipedia" is missing, but I will respect your note.
dieterdreist (2021-12-29 11:23:55+00:00): Hi, you're right, there was a typo in the VATIN, but why didn't you fix it, rather than deleting it wholesale?
francians (2021-12-29 18:01:32+00:00): Ciao Martin,

Non l'avrò trovata... Meglio non lasciare info errate IMHO.

Francesco
woodpeck (2020-05-30 15:43:19+00:00): Please specify the data source for this undiscussed data import. If the stated source "bing" refers to Bing aerial imagery it is clearly wrong since aerial imagery cannot be the source for 5,800 peaks and their names. If "bing" refers to Bing maps then the use is not legal for OSM.
woodpeck (2020-05-30 15:45:42+00:00): This import has also introduced many duplicates. Please explain what processes, if any, have been employed to avoid data duplication.
Olla_Ko (2020-02-24 09:05:46+00:00): Hi! Seems as if your edits created dragged nodes. I've reverted your changeset
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81080133
user_5359 (2020-02-16 20:04:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node. see https://www.osm.org/node/7217115626
ralley (2020-02-17 07:24:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  One minor point, please don't use abbreviations in names: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_use_abbreviations  Also there is no need to create a note if you actually perform the edit (I've closed the note now).  Thanks, Rob.
Hungerburg (2020-03-13 20:31:21+00:00): Vandalism by LanovkarJ reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82180247
pio2_122 (2020-02-18 17:45:26+00:00): Jakieś źródło?
Nakaner (2020-05-03 07:38:18+00:00): Hallo,

bitte denk daran, dass wir bei OpenStreetMap nicht nur das Bing-Satellitenbild, sondern auch noch ein paar andere Layer nutzen dürfen. Darunter befindet sich u.a. "ESRI World Imagery", das in Rheinland-Pfalz mit die amtlichen Orthophotos enthält und hinsichtlich Schärfe, Orthorektifizierung und Lagegenauigkeit alle anderen Angebote überragt. Du kannst die Hintergrundbilder im Online-Editor iD über das Ebenen-Symbol am rechten Bildschirmrand umschalten.

Beachte bitte insbesondere, dass alle anderen Layer stellenweise große Lagefehler aufweisen. Prüfe die verwendeten Satellitenbilder daher mithilfe der in OSM hinterlegten GPS-Tracks auf ihre Lagegenauigkeit, bevor du sie verwendest. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden Es wäre schade, wenn du die halbe Eifel ein paar Meter daneben einzeichnen würdest.

Viele Grüße

Michael
SomeoneElse (2020-02-16 22:19:43+00:00): Hello,
Have you discussed these changes with the Swedish OSM community more widely?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-02-16 22:20:12+00:00): Здравствуйте,
Обсуждали ли вы эти изменения с шведским сообществом OSM более широко?
С уважением,
Энди
30d4f4e1ccf24 (2020-02-17 06:58:46+00:00): Hello Andy,
No, but this is how places should be named.
Lantmäteriet Topographic Map which was used as imagery, shows correct full names on high zoom, and abbreviated names on low zoom levels. In cases when a "short" name is preferred, it is still kept as short_name tag. But generally nobody says for example, "S. Mörby", it is "stora mörby", "big mörby" if translated.
30d4f4e1ccf24 (2020-02-17 08:23:29+00:00): For example, name on this place does not look right: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6612629820#map=18/60.10883/14.16301 , but I do not know how to fix it.
archie (2020-02-17 09:12:43+00:00): You caused a self-intersecting error as a result of a dragged node (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=81102701). Please be carefull. Fixed
SomeoneElse (2020-02-17 12:33:17+00:00): You've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5803797364/history from isolated_dwelling to locality - was that deliberate, and if so was it based on local knowledge or survey, or something else?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-02-17 12:38:00+00:00): > But generally nobody says for example, "S. Mörby", it is "stora mörby", "big mörby" if translated.
I understand that's how you'd say it (I used to work in Sweden a while ago), and generally in OSM you would expand things like this, but wasn't aware if there were any rules in Swedish saying you wouldn't in a particular context (like in English where you generally don't expand "St" in placenames).
30d4f4e1ccf24 (2020-02-17 19:38:16+00:00): On the isolated_dwelling to locality change - everything points towards that nobody lives there. The place was already tagged as "ruins", Lantmäteriet map shows no data, and aerial images show no houses in vicinity. I looked there one more time and the place seems to lie on a forest trail with several other "ruins" isolated_dwelling placed around. Might also change them to place=locality tag.

On the usage of "S.", "L." etc. I am not a great expert on the topic yet, but everywhere I looked so far people use full names for places, or rather shorten the end of names, like "g." for "gata". However, "S:t" for "sankt"/"saint" - that gets shortened even on signs in writing, and I do not want to edit that, of course (maybe as alt_name).

>You caused a self-intersecting error as a result of a dragged node
Sorry!
limes11 (2020-07-20 20:46:13+00:00): Hallo geraunz, 

du hast hier auf den Wegen den access auf agricultural gesetzt. Das ist schwer zu glauben, dürfen hier nicht einmal Fußgänger lang? Ist nicht vielmehr

motor_vehicle=agricultural oder vehicle=agricultural gegebenfalls mit bicycle=yes?

Im Übrigen sollte es wohl agricultural;forestry sein, zumindest ist es das, was die Notes besagen. 

Beste Grüße, Limes
geraunz (2020-07-20 22:08:16+00:00): Ne, du hast recht. Die Notes sind von mir. Kannst du ändern, wenn du magst. Danke!
limes11 (2020-07-20 22:21:47+00:00): Ok, ich änder das. Danke!
trial (2020-02-16 21:12:18+00:00): source : https://sdem.opendatasoft.com/explore/dataset/localisation-des-defibrillateurs-municipaux-dae-ville-de-lorient/information/
marc__marc (2020-10-14 14:42:04+00:00): survey:date :)
trial (2020-10-14 16:50:54+00:00): no survey! J'aurais pu (du) mettre la date de production de la source mais ça ne vaut pas dire que la source est à jour pour autant.
marc__marc (2020-10-14 16:57:01+00:00): je voulais dire qu'il y a une typoe survey_date qui s'écrit survey:date :) peu importe si c'est toi ou si c'est la source qui l'a vu :)
trial (2020-10-14 18:02:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92487059 mind the source ;-).
J'avais regardé le bâti qui n'avait pas de survey date
bxl-forever (2020-11-22 17:02:54+00:00): Hello,
You must use amenity=kindergarten, and not change the building type.
This is because the building structure is an ordinary house.  building=kindergarten is only for a very specific construction type, not the case here.
I fixed this.
user_5359 (2020-02-17 04:32:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to describe the way with the tag "highway=residetial" and to connect the highway with the "Woodruff Street".
JochenB (2020-04-14 22:50:49+00:00): Hi, 

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz einen Großteil des Leipziger Auwaldes in einen Park mit dem Namen "Stadtgarten Lindenau" verwandelt. z.B. die Burgaue zwischen Böhlitz-Ehrenberg und Neue Luppe (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/238692/history). 

Das ist mit Sicherheit kein Park sondern tiefster Wald. Das wird wohl ein Versehen gewesen sein, bitte korrigiere das wieder. 

Danke,
Jochen
streckenkundler (2020-05-14 20:25:48+00:00): CS revertet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85222051;  see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=786889#p786889 for more details.
user_4142 (2022-01-08 21:29:35+00:00): Hei

Miksihän grilli on siirretty?
pangoSE (2020-02-17 11:42:49+00:00): Please remember to put a changeset comment.
pangoSE (2020-02-17 11:46:28+00:00): Why did you delete the v5 node? Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice the section about preserving nodes.
abrensch (2020-02-26 12:39:08+00:00): Hallo Silur,

dann muss aber auch die Baustell nördliche Julius-Leber-Strasse östlich vom Tunnel aufgehoben werdem, weil sonst besteht die Vollsperrung ja weiterhin.

Gruss, Arndt
Silur (2020-02-27 16:59:14+00:00): Moin Arndt!

Tu Dir keinen Zwang an... :-)
Ich habe nur die westliche Seite der Unterführung von oben gesehen und momentan nicht recht Zeit, den östlichen Ausgang aufzusuchen. Vermutlich hat die Baustelle bis hoch zur Max-Brauer-Allee die Seite gewechselt (wie geplant).
Ich habe da neulich schon fixme-Tags drangemacht - vielleicht kann das jemand vor Ort verifizieren?

Gruß,
Silur
abrensch (2020-02-28 18:11:13+00:00): Hallo Silur,

ich hab' mir dann mal keinen Zwang angetan und das so umgesetzt. Aber anschauen kann ich mir das nicht, da sind 500km dazwischen...

Gruss, Arndt
Silur (2020-02-29 19:04:53+00:00): Hmm, also ein _bisschen_ Einsatz könnten wir von Dir schon erwarten! :-)
!bm (2020-02-17 08:53:33+00:00): Hallo frx48, zunächst willkommen zu OSM! Bitte mache dich mit den Grundlagen von OSM vertraut – OSM ist keine Halde für dein persönliches Adressverzeichnis oder irgendwelche Tests! Da dein Eintrag nicht den Kriterien von OSM entsprach, habe ich ihn entfernt. --besteGrüße!bm
Glassman (2020-02-17 03:31:45+00:00): I believe it's a privately owned street, but access=private doesn't mean the same thing. I changed it back. If there are signs posted for no trespassing then that is different. I did look on Bing Streetside but it didn't show any signs.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81082952
Austin Olney (2020-02-17 04:35:36+00:00): Thanks for the clarification. Shouldn't a  privately owned street should still be access = private because it's not open to the public? 

Unsure about etiquette on open maps, but the road from a bystander perspective, this isn't even a road. I'm not even sure why it's labeled Bruce Street. Thanks for your help though! I defer.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:13:57+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7217280923/history has shop = boutique that was added in this edit
shop=boutique? Is it shop selling clothes? Then maybe shop=clothes would fit well, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=clothes

Or maybe shop=fashion_accessories ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fashion_accessories ) would fit better? Or shop=bag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bag ) ?

Or is it some completely different type of shop, with tag used as "boutique" is French word for shop? In such case see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for some documented values.

For shop=boutique info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=boutique page
Glassman (2020-02-17 03:35:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81083050
jpennycook (2020-02-17 19:48:31+00:00): Hi.

You've deleted the shared use path on the north side of Station Road, Addlestone, between the two roundabouts (roughly Hawker Drive to Woburn Hill).  The shared use path had been there for some time - it was marked with the sign for Shared cycle/pedestrian path shown here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycling_in_the_United_Kingdom .  Can you confirm that it really has gone?

Jon
Stekki (2020-02-26 22:51:59+00:00): It is not a separate path. It is a shared footpath (a sidewalk).

Stekki
Andy Allan (2020-02-27 09:01:00+00:00): If a sidewalk is mapped as a separate way, that's fine. Don't delete it.
woodpeck (2020-02-27 10:01:05+00:00): If the shared footpath if separated from the road by any physical barrier (even if just a kerb or strip of grass that *could* be traversed by a vehicle) then mapping the shared footpath as a separate way is always acceptable, even though it might be worth checking around especially when it comes to sidewalks along residential roads. In some areas mappers frown upon mapping them as separate geometries because it can make the map more difficult to handle.
dzidek23 (2024-04-05 08:14:45+00:00): Hi Adam,
apologies for resurrecting changeset from long forgotten past.

Because of this changeset I suspect you might still live in Eye. I wonder if you would be able to add more buildings to the village? No no, don't get me wrong, I know how hard it used to be to draw each and every building in the iD editor.

There's a much easier way now, https://rapideditor.org/

With some help of data made available by Meta and Microsoft, and using Ai you can point and click to make houses appear. It's not a silver bullet but works on 80-90% of buildings.

I'm trying to map most of the buildings in Peterborough but even using Ai it is still a rather big task. Help would be really welcomed.

Cheers
wireguy (2020-02-17 13:38:17+00:00): @WoodWoseWulf  marked good, but continued cleanup work adding additional crossings, footways, and correcting warnings. thx.
WoodWoseWulf (2020-02-17 22:40:58+00:00): Fantastic, thanks so much. It was great working with you to help sort this out.
johnarupire (2020-02-17 05:15:13+00:00): Hola, qué significa "c.ugug jhkyutcu,g uykggc"
user_5359 (2020-02-22 17:11:06+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kleiner Hinweis zur Öffnungszeit bei Restaurant: Es gibt keine Aussage zum Freitag.
SuMi Bar & Restaurant (2020-02-22 22:39:13+00:00): Danke schön für diesen Hinweis! Passen wir gleich an.
user_5359 (2020-02-17 04:23:46+00:00): Hello! Short hint: In OSM we used the two-letter country abbreviation in capital letters for the value of addr:country. The value is US instead of USA. Also inside USA we didn't use addr:place, special the name of business isn't the value of addr:place.
bgirardot (2020-02-17 11:27:50+00:00): Aye, thank you.
wgwksch_2020 (2020-02-17 19:31:48+00:00): ...bitte nicht böse sein. Aber deine Penetranz geht mir auf die Nerven. Ich habe nicht die geringste Lust mit dir weiter zu "diskutieren". Mach was du willst und tschüss.
Akkurator (2020-02-17 19:50:56+00:00): Für eine Antwort fehlen mir die Worte und das diplomatische Geschick.

Für Außenstehende hier die Vorgeschichte:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79163224
PT-53 (2020-02-18 08:16:57+00:00): Hallo Til Man,
Du bist neu bei OSM und machst - wie jeder andere auch  - Fehler. Wenn man Dich unterstützen und aufzeigen will, wie es richtig gemacht wird, bist Du leider nicht sehr einsichtig und aufnahmebereit. 
Schade
wgwksch_2020 (2020-02-18 11:16:31+00:00): ...auf den Ton kommt es tatsächlich an. Und auf eine schulmeisterliche Art kann ich wirklich verzichten. Die gleichen schlechten Erfahrungen haben leider schon Andere gemacht - mit so neunmalklugen "Akkuratesken". 
So - nun genug der Zeitverschwendung bezüglich des 100prozentigen Mapperspezialwissens   ;-)
Habt allesamt noch einen schönen Tag -  Adieu
PT-53 (2020-02-18 11:35:41+00:00): << ...auf den Ton kommt es tatsächlich an. >>
Ist denn Dein Ton bessser?
Akkurator (2020-02-19 02:42:30+00:00): Ich lerne ja gerne dazu und daher würde mich im vorliegenden Fall wirklich (ohne Ironie und doppelten Boden) interessieren: wie hätte ich meine Nachfrage bzgl. Rosenweg konkret formulieren sollen, damit Til Man sich nicht beschulmeistert fühlt?
Akkurator (2020-02-29 16:52:29+00:00): hier geht es weiter: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81386374
CurranC (2020-02-16 23:23:27+00:00): … joins in its *SE* corner
zzptichka (2020-02-17 02:24:38+00:00): Hi Danny,
Any reason why you are deleting perfectly good mapillary tags like this one for retiremement residence?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=UdLaAT32Zu2zZ-uK2bMbow&focus=photo
DannyMcD (2020-02-17 03:50:28+00:00): Yes
zzptichka (2020-02-17 03:54:59+00:00): Care to elaborate?
DannyMcD (2020-02-17 03:57:23+00:00): I will send you a PM explaining why.
DannyMcD (2020-02-17 04:18:08+00:00): I have reverted this changeset because of your concerns.
johnarupire (2020-02-17 05:37:37+00:00): Hola Walter 666, en nuestra sala en telegram hemos visto algunas de tus ediciones y creemos que están mal hechas, quisiéramos invitarte a unirte a ese grupo a discutir esta cuestión, ya que consideramos que le restas calidad al mapa. Saludos.
Aquí un link al grupo http://t.me/osmpe