piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-10-05 09:34:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to map accurate and square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112099398
Frans S (2021-10-05 09:32:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
You mapped 1 building which is far oversized and not squared.
This is a building only project. Please focus on that.
(a path in the middle of nowhere tagging as Motorroad makes no sense)

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112099614
BidgeeWagga (2021-10-05 11:03:38+00:00): Could you please stop creating incorrect roads that no longer exist. Just because old aerial/satellite imagery shows it, doesn't mean it still exists.
Frans S (2021-10-05 09:29:49+00:00): Hi.  
A request. Please do not upload 1 building at the time.  Map as many buildings you can on your screen and upload them in 1 go.
Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112099731
ZLima12 (2021-11-04 19:52:02+00:00): Please don't do that. This data is already represented in the ref value on the motorway_junction node, and the junction:ref value on the exit way.
Frans S (2021-10-05 09:24:29+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Never let a road crossing a building. (Navigation systems cannot make a route through a building )
Move the nodes of the road aside
You also connected 2 buildings together by their nodes. Please don't do that. Never connect a node of buildings to another feature like roads.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112099812
Frans S (2021-10-05 09:28:33+00:00): Hello. You mapped 1 building here.
I doubt this is a building. If it is a building at all, certainly not as big as you drew it.
I miss clear outlines and shading
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112099829
Владимир К (2022-01-11 13:19:35+00:00): Здравствуйте.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42022688/history на этой дорожке, вы указали access=no и horse=designated + нескольк permit. то есть на эту дорогу нельзя никому, кроме пешеходов, велосипедистов и машин, но по билету-пропуску, как в национальный парк? и при этом сделана дорога в первую очередь для лошадей. конная тропа на заводе. 
Что-то мне подсказывает, что это не соответствует реальной ситуации.

Давайте представим, что к воротам завода подъедет житель другого города или даже страны. что ему нужно, чтобы попасть на завод?
Lucifer Kinoff (2022-01-12 05:26:13+00:00): Исправил.
ovruni (2021-10-05 04:48:29+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregando una calle residencial ficticia, esta vía es la escalera, que puede visualizarse desde Esri aclarado. 
Saludos
ovruni (2021-10-05 04:52:06+00:00): La imagen de Esri aclarado puede seleccionarse desde el cuarto botón de la derecha, donde sale una lista de imágenes de fondo a utilizar.
Saludos
LockOnGuy (2022-04-17 19:11:53+00:00): Hello Chusovaya, this relation still appears in Apple Maps and now where ever you put a point in the Basra provenance you will have "Al Qitah" name shown as the address.    
There is no such thing as "Al Qitah", this will give Apple Maps users in Basra a bad experience.         
You can open Apple Maps and put any dropped point in Basra and see what's the address.    
Here is a screenshot: https://i.ibb.co/fYmBY5N/Basra.png    
Please fix the Apple map ASAP, thank you!
Chusovaya (2022-04-20 06:33:41+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to my attention, I’ve shared this with my colleagues and they are working on making the fix! Happy mapping!
LockOnGuy (2022-04-24 08:17:01+00:00): Thank you. I let my friends in Basra knows that the error will be fixed soon, They’re thanking you too.
ToniE (2021-10-05 07:08:35+00:00): Servus,

barrier = bollard 

statt

name = Zwei ...

Ansonsten perfekt. 

Für 'name=...' gekten Regeln:

"name is the name only"

Will sagen: wenn das Ding einen (offiziellen) Namen, ein Schild hat, dann ist name= erlaubt, name= soll nicht zur Beschreibung des Objektes genommen werden.

Ob es zwei oder nur ein bollard mitten auf der Straße ist, ist weniger relevant.

barrier=bollard ist für motor_vehicle (Autos, ...) als "nicht passierbar" definiert. foot und bicycle können allerdings durch. Also keine weiteren Tags notwendig.

Gruß
Toni
Frans S (2021-10-05 09:18:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112102128
ovruni (2021-10-05 05:11:42+00:00): Hola nurdiana_ui, gracias por contribuir a OSM. En este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado una calle residencial que no parece existir desde ninguna de la imagen de Bing indicada. ¿Este otra imagen que este utilizando?
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
ovruni (2021-10-05 05:12:50+00:00): Dado que esta cuenta parece tener alguna relación con otra cuenta que ha estado agregando vías residenciales ficticias, la he comentado en la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2021-October/000896.html
Por favor participe allí.
Saludos
nurdiana_ui (2021-10-05 05:31:39+00:00): Hola ovruni, gracias por tu información. Perdón por el error que cometí al agregar la calle. ¿Puedo unirme al canal de telegramas?
ovruni (2021-10-05 05:35:01+00:00): Si por favor, únete al canal de telegram. Ahí podemos coordinar el mapeo.
mueschel (2021-10-06 08:20:58+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM.
Please check your edits for spelling mistakes, e.g. you added many different versions of a "Hospital ID' tag here.

In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!
Frans S (2021-10-06 07:35:06+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key.
A remark as well. You mapped a few buildings and included the yard next to it. Just map the building itself.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112103371
MxxCon (2021-10-06 03:12:32+00:00): Hello.
Please write more detailed changeset comments than just "added new content". This article explains in more detail why it's good to do: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Additionally, please group your changes into smaller geographic areas, such as neighborhood, city/town or at most state, to make it easier for others to review your changes and make it easier to fix any possible issues.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112103845
sinrarch (2021-10-05 06:04:59+00:00): Hi,
I have made the edits in this changeset : 112104153 based on Driver feedback.

Regards,
sinrarch.
Warin61 (2026-04-10 05:16:35+00:00): Hi,
Multipolgon outer ways cannot share segments.
See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=175.61938&lat=-40.33880&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Warin61 (2026-04-10 05:18:15+00:00): Again? See 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=175.59447&lat=-40.34534&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
PT-53 (2021-10-05 07:37:00+00:00): Hallo  martineinstein,
Du hast an diesem Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253312997/history
die Hausnummer von 7 auf 6 abgeändert. Das ist falsch. Die 6 gehört zu diesem Gebäude
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/253312996/history

Die Firma Sport Konrad ist auf 2 Gebäude aufgeteilt, Sportbekleidung im Gebäude 7 und Schuhe im Gebäude 6.

Ich habe Deine Änderung der Hausnummer wieder zurückgesetzt.

Grüße
ZLima12 (2021-10-07 20:55:40+00:00): Saw Mill River Parkway is not built to motorway standards here.
Znaika (2021-10-31 11:22:54+00:00): Hallo. Du hast POI als Konten gelöscht https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9101521349/history und das ganze Gebäude so definiert https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127628453#map=19/51.22746/6.59941.
Es ist nicht immer macht Sinn, besonders wenn das ein Wohgebäude ist und im Erdgeschoß ein Laden ist. In diesem Fall ist auch eine Waschanlage dort unter einem Dach.
Gruß, Znaika
Nakaner (2022-05-03 16:28:59+00:00): Hallo,

der gelöschte Place-Node und die gelöschten landuse=residential-Fläche wurden wiederhergestellt, weil die Löschung unbegründet und nicht nachvollziehbar war. Die Löschung war ein Versehen, oder?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120507141

Bitte gib beim Hochladen künftig immer einen aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar an.

Viele Grüße

Michael
MarkusHD (2023-06-12 23:47:55+00:00): Die Straße "Sandkuhle" ist aktuell (über 1,5 Jahre nach diesem Änderungssatz) nicht fertig gebaut, man kann dort nicht von "Deichhörn" im Norden zu "Auf der Gast" im Süden laufen, das meiste ist noch Baustelle.

Was war die Quelle für die recht ungenau oder falsch eingetragenen Gebäude und die Straßen? Ein Plan vom Architekten?
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-05 17:39:11+00:00): come messi d'accordo utilizza → al posto di >, grazie comunque per il contributo apprezzato!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112106172
eggie (2021-10-05 07:15:51+00:00): Dag mmaresch  Je vraagt feedback
tracktype=grade1 hoort niet bij fine_gravel Ik heb er weer tracktype=grade2 van gemaakt. 
(grade1 is beton of asfalt)
access=no heb ik verwijderd. Dat geeft problemen in de routatie. motor_vehicle=destination icm met moped en mofa =yes is voldoende. 
MVG
eggie
ZLima12 (2021-10-07 20:56:41+00:00): Hi,

Bronx River Parkway is not built to motorway standards here.
map per (2021-11-18 19:35:17+00:00): Hallo heilbron,

warum hast du hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278513971) cycleway=lane zu cycleway:both=separate geändert, obwohl in OSM kein Radweg separat eingezeichnet ist? Bitte keine falschen Sachen in OSM einzeichnen, damit mach man die Karte kaputt.

Viele Grüße
map per
muzirian (2022-03-18 14:09:35+00:00): Hi Hampanna,

Please try going through tagging scheme for Indian Highways in osm wiki.
Also use mapwithai after you get familiar with iD and local tagging scheme and know about the locality  thats being mapped
muzirian (2022-03-18 14:10:06+00:00): There are lot of geometry and tagging issues coming from mapwithai
eggie (2021-10-05 07:18:20+00:00): Beter dus niet algemeen access=destination taggen, maar eerst de categorie .. dus 
motor_vehicle=destination
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-05 07:19:30+00:00): .. en moped=yes en mofa= yes toevoegen.
Kijk je nog even?
gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-05 07:23:26+00:00): Zojuist vertaald naar het Nederlands  de lastige accesstags
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:access

zie ook

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=842962#p842962
mmaresch (2021-10-05 07:27:02+00:00): Kan me hierin vinden. Kun je de voorgestelde verbeteringen toepassen? 

Groeten

Maarten Maresch
eggie (2021-10-05 07:33:59+00:00): 'k Heb al iets aangepast.

Het blijft lastig.... die accesstags vooral als er uitzonderingen zijn. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-05 07:42:05+00:00): Maarten.. vraagje.. Kunnen die gebouwen in de noordoostelijke hoek weg?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=geerbunders&resultOffset=0&objectId=0860100001694618&geometry.x=165974.52854462&geometry.y=404657.19418411&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0860100001694618

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-05 10:47:03+00:00): Oke.. bedankt voor de info.. De twee gebouwen waaronder de nummer 31 heb ik verwijderd.
Gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
ZLima12 (2021-10-07 20:55:03+00:00): Hi,

What is your source for the name "Taconic Parkway Road"? I have never heard this name before as a local.
abakus_uploader (2021-10-05 22:31:01+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SHARCRASH (2021-10-05 22:22:14+00:00): Hi! What's your new place of worship exactly? Don't you mean the chapel which then your new node is a duplication? I don't recall anything being behind the chapel.
BCNorwich (2021-10-05 09:13:16+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The OSM database regarding this path is correct, the path does exist it is a Public Right of Way. If the path is overgrown or difficult to find a tag describing the problem could be added (note=overgrown and difficult to find or description=overgrown), but this information will not be rendered on a map.

Your best way to remedy a problem like this is to report it to the County Highway Authority, they have a duty to ensure PRoW's are fit for use. Here is a link to make a report:- https://tinyurl.com/3m7ubb8k

Regards Bernard.
canfe (2021-10-09 13:36:53+00:00): Ma la way 989819547 non mi sembra una farmland, bensì un impianto fotovoltaico. Sicuro??
canfe (2021-11-04 17:14:49+00:00): Guardando con le clarity son sicuro sia un fotovoltaico.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
mueschel (2021-10-09 14:17:55+00:00): Hi,
what does 'ridershare' mean? This tag is nto used in any other place.

And what are "proprietary sources"? All data that is added to OSM must be compatible with the ODbL license and the contributor terms.
smikhnouski_lyft (2021-10-11 11:12:18+00:00): Hi, Mueschel! My name is Stepan and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention to this. There is an access=no tag on the driveway that is interfering with the routing through the road. The tag rideshare=yes allows ridesharing companies to make routing on this part of the road. So I added rideshare=yes according to Proposed features/Rideshare Access
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Rideshare_Access
Rideshare vehicles may not have any specified stickers or other designated elements on them which are often present on taxis. In some States, these differences are established by law, e.g. at major airports and other zones with the separation of pick-up and drop-off areas for taxis and for rideshare vehicles.
Lyft has been working for many years with OSM and we follow the terms and guidelines responsibly. To make edits, the Lyft OSM team uses proprietary features created and owned by Lyft, specifically the street-level imagery from Lyft’s drivers taken during rides in various markets and Lyft drivers' GPS tracks. That means our evidence fully complies with the OSM requirements. This data is updated frequently and we try to make edits based on the most recent data.
As to the discussed case, we used the image from 2021-09-24 for this edit, taken from the service road w204687827
28°22′40″N, 81°33′9″W

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yiOEgX_YUDa-9JxhK_Eo7UHPrGbFtowg/view?usp=sharing.

I hope we provide the necessary context about this tag, please let me know if something is unclear to you.Thank you so much for your input in the OSM!
Best regards, Stepan
mueschel (2021-10-11 11:32:04+00:00): Hi Stephan,
thanks for the repsonse!
So, I suggest to change the tag "ridershare", to "rideshare".
smikhnouski_lyft (2021-10-11 12:53:13+00:00): Oh, I totally missed the misspell! Thank you so much for noticing. I’ve fixed the tag in the OSM changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112371914. 
Many thanks for your suggestion and attentiveness. Sorry for any inconvenience.
Best regards, Stepan
Dimacn (2021-10-05 12:36:06+00:00): Скажите, зачем вы новый парк отдыха добавили поверх уже существующего парка?
Frans S (2021-10-05 09:09:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Vague traces without a clear rooflines or shadow are mostly no buildings.
Please do not oversize your mappings. 

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112111152
Dodko (2023-07-15 19:11:43+00:00): Nemeň dohodnuté názvy pošty.
https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/afglwDyRtBM/m/KGd1-IjvAQAJ
jmsbert (2022-10-02 12:49:28+00:00): Hallo Jever61, welche Quelle hast Du zum Einzeichnen der Gebäudekonturen verwendet - auf keinem der üblichen Satellitenbilder (Bing, Esri, Maxpbox und Maxar) sind diese sichtbar. Bitte immer im Changeset angeben, was Quelle ist, sowie was überhaupt gemacht wurde.
Außerdem sind die Adressen doppelt zugewiesen - einmal auf isolierten Nodes, dann der Gebäudekontur. Bitte die Nodes mit der Kontur verschmelzen (CTRL+Shift+G in JOSM)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112111943