piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Martiniano_2 (2017-11-16 18:00:35+00:00): obrigado por informar , sou reconhecedor geografico na cidade de jaboatão dos guararapes os limites são doplano diretor do municipio mesmo assim farei um esforço para utilizar ao maximo as fontes de dados do ibge 2010
santamariense (2017-11-16 22:33:25+00:00): @Onainitram, isso mesmo. O Plano Diretor de uma cidade prevalece sobre dados do IBGE. Mas tome cuidado para não bagunçar os limites. Existem também padronizações a serem seguidas. Qualquer dúvida ou ajuda, pode recorrer a comunidade https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact (sendo o Telegram o mais dinâmico e que podem te ajudar até mesmo nas dúvidas que vai surgindo na edição)

Uma coisa que eu fortemente te sugiro é aprender a usar o JOSM para fazer esses tipos de edições no OSM. Neste link você encontra alguns tutoriais: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCbdDCg2DvbGvdUnImoQd4xw , além do auxílio da comunidade, é claro ;)
mavl (2018-12-25 21:46:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:03:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-15 17:56:38+00:00): water=canal zou je eraf kunnen halen.. Dat dekt de lading niet.
eggie (2017-11-15 18:27:29+00:00): voetpaden graag intekenen als highway=footway.. pedestrian is meer voor voetgangersgebieden. Ook als vlak.
eggie (2017-11-15 18:13:02+00:00): Op de Calandweg bij de kruising zit iets dubbel. Ik kijk even.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53811391
eggie (2017-11-15 18:16:09+00:00): Calandweg hersteld. Die zat een beetje heen en weer dubbel. Duplicate way.
eggie (2017-11-15 18:17:59+00:00): Dit was mijn edit http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53811913
Leo Slager (2017-11-16 12:09:15+00:00): Dank je, ik vertrouw de melding toch niet helemaal, mogelijk ook een verouderde luchtfoto, dus ik ga daar zelf eens even kijken,
eggie (2017-11-16 12:27:22+00:00): Mooi.. dat is het echte mapperswerk!  :)
saintam1 (2017-11-15 20:26:25+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

If you know that there is no hairdresser here, feel free to delete it. It's been there for 6 years, it could very well be outdated.

Happy mapping!
lleung (2017-12-03 16:22:45+00:00): 請注意當衛星不是在正上方，可看到建築物側面時，不要將建築物側面也描繪出來。地圖上應當是建築物的平面圖。同時要留心衛星影像的位置偏移。
lleung (2017-12-03 16:30:03+00:00): 例如這個：https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/496481783 (我已恢復，show more 可以看到區別)
HolloWorld (2017-12-04 05:36:52+00:00): Thanks for the advises !
mavl (2018-12-25 19:55:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:15:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:20:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:32:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:14:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-07-30 03:07:43+00:00): Hi ALYZUIDEMA
I'va changed this road classification of this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53811850) to residential road
Thank you
mavl (2018-12-25 21:16:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
arvdk (2017-11-15 21:01:35+00:00): You eddited a road. Please mind your description. Besides, see this node about your edit: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1207309
mavl (2018-12-25 19:40:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:59:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:01:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
carciofo (2017-11-16 08:41:34+00:00): Hi, regarding the segments from Natioanal Highway 29 which were changed from highway=trunk to motorway in this changeset, please note that these roads don't satisfy the requirements for motorways. Kindly set back to trunk. Thanks
Jan van Bekkum (2017-11-16 15:41:18+00:00): Hello,

I drove the road in March of this year.Not only it was indicated as Motorway, but in my opinion it also met the Colombian requirements for Motorways. Therefore I don't believe it is necessary to reverse the change I made.
carciofo (2017-11-18 18:41:42+00:00): How exaclty is it "indicated as a motorway"? The local name "autopista" does not mean that the road qualifies as a motorway: for starters, the road has at-grade intersections and does not have controlled access (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway). There are no roads in Colombia that fit the definition of motorways (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway). Kindly revert.
Jan van Bekkum (2017-11-19 06:30:24+00:00): The definition in OSM for Motorways includes the following:
1. GENERALLY resemble a controlled access road and must be free from intersection controls (such as traffic-signals, rotaries and roundabouts, and stop signs or stop markings);
2. Typically have at least two lanes in each traffic direction with some degree of separation;
3. Have access roads only for servicing purposes, such as a limited number of driveways serving non-residential property, service roads to infrastructure, or rest-area roads or bays, which may be more typical in regional or rural settings

For the roads under discussion condition 2. and 3. are met and 1. is TYPICALLY met (there are exceptions). As the road is called Autovia and the OSM international equivalence table does not give more detailed specifications for Colombia I still believe the change was correct.

However, I noticed that my change was already reversed by someone else. I'll keep it like that and focus my attention on other areas.
carciofo (2017-11-20 08:37:34+00:00): The road is *colloquially* called Autopista, not autovia. As you probably are aware, names don't necessarily map to tags in OSM, much less in cases where international meaning of the same word varies greatly. Further, 3 is also not satisfied as the intersections are not serviceways (both tertiary and secondary intersections exist at-grade in the segment you edited). I will add the entry for Colombia to the international road equivalences article on Wikipedia to clarify what is already established in the wiki article linked in my comment above. Thanks
mavl (2018-12-25 19:16:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
L'imaginaire (2017-11-16 12:18:13+00:00): Deze aanpassingen werden gedaan op basis van verouderde luchtfoto's. De huidige situatie was vrij correct gemapt als ik me niet vergis.
L'imaginaire (2017-11-16 14:26:41+00:00): We zijn er om te helpen natuurlijk. 
Kan je jouw aanpassing zelf eens kritisch bekijken en waar nodig opnieuw juist zetten (op basis van recente luchtfoto's en eventueel een plaatsbezoek)? Of laat je dit liever over aan anderen?
delgante (2017-11-17 08:29:41+00:00): Ik ben hier zelf vorige maand op plaatsbezoek geweest omdat de OSM-data verouderd was door de vele nieuwe infrastructuuraanpassingen. Op basis van verschillende gps-tracks (gelogd met auto/fiets/tevoet) heb ik zo de situatie geactualiseerd. Gebruik van orthofoto's hebben op deze plaats door de voortdurende wijzigingen weinig zin.
delgante (2017-11-17 08:36:14+00:00): Het segment Bovenhove (540767545)  mag wat mij betreft dus opnieuw verwijderd worden.
L'imaginaire (2017-11-17 23:55:23+00:00): Ok, done. Bedankt voor de uitleg en voor het nauwkeurige mapping-werk!
BHiko (2017-11-20 09:20:09+00:00): @L'imaginaire @delgante. Ik kreeg via http://www.osm.be/2017/01/06/en-project-road-completion.html en bijhorende maproulette bericht dat hier iets niet n orde was en wijzigde weinig omdat ik met imagery wijzigingen zag (JOSM AGIV recent en AGIV 10cm) maar dat dit onvoldoende was. Bedankt voor jullie werk en sorry als ik iets fout deed.
L'imaginaire (2017-11-20 09:35:55+00:00): Geen probleem! Altijd goed om eens met meerdere ogen naar complexe situaties te kijken.
literan (2017-11-18 11:05:05+00:00): Добрый день! по поводу этой точки: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5230921935#map=19/55.80249/37.54377 shop это всегда розница. Так что если там только опт - т.е. я не могу с улицы прийти и купить одни боксерские перчатки - то это надо менять на office=company
F-5 System (2017-11-20 10:05:03+00:00): Я действительно вначале указал как shop, но поскольку купить там нельзя, то до сохранения поменял на офис. Похоже что-то пошло не так, поскольку тег сайта тоже не сохранился. Сейчас поправил.
Glassman (2017-11-18 16:06:12+00:00): should have been made by my Glassman username.
eggie (2017-11-15 19:12:02+00:00): Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. Ik kijk er even naar. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53812844
Constable (2017-11-22 17:53:20+00:00): hi there, I just came across this trail you added some days ago https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540768385
Are you sure it's really there? I mean, it looks like it cuts through a few volleyball pitches. Looks like you used the strava heatmap to map it and if you take a closer look at the heatmap you'll see this trail as a part of a circuit, I suspect it was a ciclocross race held in october https://www.strava.com/segments/796793. CX is a discipline which includes few sand section on each lap and that could explain why the trail cuts through those pitches.
I think this trail should be removed as it is probably not a real trail. Let me know if you have any local knowledge and if you might be able to survey the area.
Thanks
eggie (2017-11-15 19:09:01+00:00): Tip: Wanneer een pad een onderdoorgang door een gebouw  heeft dan dat stuk taggen als tunnel=building_passage, en  layer=-1
eggie (2017-11-15 19:09:29+00:00): Een voorbeeld zit bij nr 32
eggie (2017-11-15 19:16:23+00:00): Het path heeft geen tags en zit een beetje dubble. Ik zal je de welkomstmail sturen met een aantal tips.
Even niet mappen hier.
The path collapses as duplicated way and has no tags. I'm fixing its. Please reply if possible in Dutch... Otherwise English.
eggie (2017-11-15 19:26:37+00:00): Het pad is uit de knoop"gehaald en hersteld. . 
ik heb er de tag highway=path aan gegeven. Er waren geen tags aan toegevoegd. Het was een lege "way.
surveyor54 (2017-11-16 10:33:38+00:00): Hi,
nur für mich, zum besseren Verständnis.
Du vergibst hier auf Waldwegen das Tag  surface=wood.  
Was soll ich mir darunter vorstellen.

Liegen da Bretter, gehexeltes Holz oder ???

Gruß
surveyor54
Radmaroeder (2017-11-16 11:36:42+00:00): Hi,
sollte Waldweg sein, ich werde das ändern.
Gruß
Norbert
Radmaroeder (2017-11-16 11:37:19+00:00): Ich hoffe ich habe nichts vergessen
surveyor54 (2017-11-16 18:05:41+00:00): Schau die diese bitte noch einmal an:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310819020
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341826329
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450677738
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517059687
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532340909
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532340911
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532340913
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532340915
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532340917
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533232642
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538505766

Da ist noch was dabei.

Gruß
surveyor54
Radmaroeder (2017-11-17 10:49:41+00:00): Hallo,

ich hoffe ich habe alles.
Ich werde in Zukunft ein bisschen besser darauf achten.
Für Verbesserungen und Vorschläge bin ich jederzeit dankbar.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

N.Gerhard
arvdk (2017-11-15 20:49:53+00:00): Hi, please describe what you have edited in the description. It's not 2 buildings..
besides, I think you accidentally moved this node because the foot path now ends in the middle of a pond: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2893521481
DaveF (2017-11-15 22:27:52+00:00): A car aprk in surface
Hjart (2017-11-15 19:38:26+00:00): Vejen  er ikke færdig?
DanelNo5 (2017-11-15 20:33:38+00:00): Jo, den er færdig.
Hjart (2017-11-15 21:30:38+00:00): Super. jeg har lige lavet et par mindre ændringer.
ChristopherMatthewTurner (2017-11-15 19:48:11+00:00): Nice building edits!
LockOnGuy (2022-05-04 01:53:04+00:00): Hello siyuanx, and welcome to OSM, in this changeset you tagged these buildings you added with "area=yes" instead of "building=yes". Just wanted to let you know.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/53816453
ridixcr (2017-11-15 19:59:48+00:00): sorry comment error!

Mapping exit and destinations in San Antonio
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-08-28 03:05:42+00:00): Hi Алекс Мок,
I changed the classification of the road (way540804836) to be residential road.
Thank you.
btwhite92 (2017-11-15 20:32:48+00:00): This convention is based off signage observable on other CA expressway/freeways with point at-grade intersections. See CA 70 & Kempton Rd., CA 99 & Sankey Rd. for similar examples.
dahliaalamy (2017-11-15 21:11:58+00:00): #uclagisday2017
eggie (2017-11-15 22:20:55+00:00): Merged info with bag address-node. Please use the present nodes. Don't add duplicate addresses.
BCNorwich (2017-11-16 08:42:28+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your StreetComplete app has not actually put the speed limits into OSM. It has added the tag "maxspeed:type=GB:nsl_single" which is the type of speed limit but not the actual speed restriction. The tag "maxspeed=30mph" needs to be added to show a restriction of a maximium of 30 miles per hour.
I don't use StreetComplete so I can't advise how to do this.

Regards Bernard
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-15 20:44:43+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 53795774, 53795823, 53795990, 53796134, 53796357, 53796451, 53796487, 53796867, 53796942, 53797201, 53797257, 53797284, 53797296, 53797319, 53797360, 53797389, 53797460, 53797480, 53797552, 53797566, 53797691, 53797709, 53797732.
nevw (2017-11-16 09:10:39+00:00): I think you should read this post when considering merging landuse areas to the centreline of roads:
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/5352/should-the-edges-of-landuse-or-boundary-areas-share-points-with-streets-that-form-their-borders
The issue was recently raised in the help forum and the reply directed to the above.
tracker5 (2017-11-16 09:16:30+00:00): I noticed my mistake after I read this "meme" on the openstreetmap subreddit on reddit https://i.redd.it/7r3xp43m4hxz.png

What should I do? manually re-align the wooded area /grass/residential area?
tracker5 (2017-11-16 09:18:42+00:00): Also can I start mapping roads with area:highway if that is technically correct?
nevw (2017-11-16 09:20:42+00:00): It's not really a mistake so I would leave as is unless it bothers you. My preference is to not merge them but others differ.
nevw (2017-11-16 09:23:38+00:00): I haven't considered mapping roads with area:highway so no opinion from me.
Regards
Nev
tracker5 (2017-11-16 09:24:58+00:00): take a look at this proposal - it looks pretty awesome

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area:highway
nevw (2017-11-16 09:47:22+00:00): Yes, I have come across this recently somewhere else, but is too detailed for me, though I do see the merits of dedicated mapping in that manner.
iandees (2017-11-15 21:14:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap! This change looks great. One thing to note is that when entering the name of a road we don't use the abbreviated parts of the road name because it's easier for a computer to build the abbreviation than it is to un-abbreviate. In this case, the road should be "Snyder Lane" rather than "Snyder Ln".
gileri (2017-11-27 21:01:33+00:00): Bonjour,

Source=knowledge est très imprécis comme source, qui signifie "connaissance".

Toutes les contributions sont basées sur la connaissance d'une information, mais ce qui compte c'est de savoir d'où vient cette connaissance (ex: survey, ortophotos, photos satellites, mapillary etc.), pour donner une validité à la donnée.
dahliaalamy (2017-11-15 21:11:26+00:00): #uclagisday2017
dahliaalamy (2017-11-15 21:13:12+00:00): #uclagisday2017
chillly (2017-11-19 18:55:38+00:00): Could you please use more descriptive changeset comments. 'Improvements' really is too brief.
rurseekatze (2018-07-24 14:38:19+00:00): Hi filu,

in this and other changesets 8 months ago, you changed the railway stations at the Line Knin – Zadar to railway=yard or disused:railway=station. If have no local knowledge and cannot find much information about this line in German or English sources, but https://prodaja.hzpp.hr/en/Ticket/Journey?StartId=76260&DestId=76317&ReturnTrip=false&DepartureDate=2018-07-24&ReturnDepartureDate=2018-07-24 says that there is bus transport. Is there really just freight traffic any more on this track? Then the tracks should be tagged as railway:traffic_mode=freight, at the moment they have railway:traffic_mode=mixed.

Best Regards
Alex
filu (2018-07-26 09:56:34+00:00): Hi,

Yeah, line 71 has no passenger trains for a few years now.

http://www.hzpp.hr/Media/Default/Documents/kurir%202018%20-srpanj.pdf
Chris Fleming (2017-11-19 12:48:44+00:00): Hi Alistair, I see that you requested a review of these edits, I wanted to drop you a quick note and let you know that the edits look great. 

Please let me know if you have any questions.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-12-02 21:08:46+00:00): Poproszę źródło tej zmiany?
Aight 2009 (2017-12-03 17:24:31+00:00): Jestem z Jasła i ta ulica się tak zawsze nazywała, podobnie jak obok ks. Stanisława Konarskiego

przykładowo: https://mapa.nocowanie.pl/jaslo/ulice/

jednak tam wszystkie skróty w nazwach ulic są rozwinięte, a wymienione ulice mają skróty
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-12-03 18:05:31+00:00): I to ma być wiarygodne źródło? Śmiem wątpić. Poproszę dokument urzędowy lub zdjęcie tabliczki z terenu. Poza tym, na tej stronie widzę rozwinięte skróty, a Ty dałeś "ks." "bł.". W OSM rozwijamy skróty w nazwach ulic.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-12-03 23:22:46+00:00): Nie tagujemy dróg w ten sposób. Dostęp do drogi zawsze ktoś ma, a dając access=no wyłączasz go zupełnie. Access=private byłoby lepsze.
5m4u9 (2017-11-16 03:37:45+00:00): para otras ocasiones, los mercados en bolivia los registramos como "marketplace o mercado"
Glassman (2017-11-16 00:37:47+00:00): We don't use descriptive names, like name=Appartment. I changed the building=yes to building=apartments.
Carnildo (2017-11-17 18:49:27+00:00): Thanks for your additions.

For future reference, it's best if you save your changes before moving to edit in a new area.  An edit like this will show up in the map history for anyone looking at the west coast of the United States or a large part of the Pacific Ocean, even though it only actually affects two small areas.
aceman444 (2024-04-01 22:51:06+00:00): Zdravim, aky je zdroj tychto zmien? Bing, ktory jediny uvadzate zrejme nie.
Lebo podla sucasneho katastra (ZBGIS) ta Konvalinkova bola umiestnena aj spravne, neviem teda preco bol nazov presunuty na chodnik v ZOO. A kam ste dali nazov Kalinova je dnes nazov Stuhova. Ulica Kalinova v Karlovej vsi ani nema existovat, napr. podla https://bratislava.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/Dokumenty/Str%C3%A1nky/Zoznam_komunikacii_v_Bratislave_februar_2020.pdf je vo Vrakuni. Skuste to teda poopravovat.
Illio (2024-04-02 11:39:09+00:00): Ak si dobre pamätám, bola mapa, myslím, že sa volala "Mapa BSK", ktorá bola na portáli BSK a tam boli tieto názvy. Názov Kalinová nájdeme aj na mapách z 90., resp. 00. rokov, niekde v tvare "Kalinová cesta". Je pravda, že mapy už túto ulicu neuvádzajú.
Svalbard (2017-11-16 06:27:40+00:00): Hallo BeKri,

auch Bezug nehmend auf Deine anderen "refinement"-CS: Kannst Du bitte kurz erläutern,

- warum Du fast vollständige Adressen (es fehlt die Hausnr.) löschst

- woher Deine genauen Ortskenntnisse in Schleswig-Holstein stammen, wenn als Quelle z. B. Bayern (80 cm) angegeben wird (deckt das auch S-H mit Adressen ab?)

- warum Du (unterstellt, dass Du keine Ortskenntnis besitzt) den Einstiegshinweis bei Aufruf der osm-suspects-Seite mit Deinen Deinen Änderungen ignorierst?

Vielen Dank!

Gruß

Svalbard
BeKri (2017-11-16 06:54:15+00:00): Servus Svalbald,
zu 1: fast vollständig ist unvollständig, für mich ein Fehler
zu 2: als Quelle steht bayern 80 drin weil ich das in Josm als Standart drinstehen habe, ich habe aber auch Bing drinstehen
zu 3: ehrlich gesagt weiß ich nicht, welchen Einstiegshinweis Du meinst.
Kannst Du bitte konkret mitteilen, was Dich stört ?
Gruss derBeKri
BeKri (2017-11-16 07:22:04+00:00): Servus Svalbal,
ich noch mal,
ich habe diesen CS nochmal durchgesehen
und gebe folgende Erläuterungen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227850503
	Hausnummer 5 wohl kaum richtig, da ungerade Nummern gegenüber
	Hs-Nummer war somit doppelt, eine ist falsch, welche wohl ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227850507
	Hs-Nummer seit fast 4 Jahren nicht ergänzt,
	bin davon ausgegangen das Du keine Interesse mehr hattest 
	und habe unvollständige Angaben gelöscht
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/227850497
	siehe oben
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2687167389
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2687167385
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251998182
	siehe oben
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257274394
	siehe oben
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259592216
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259592246
    doppelter Eintrag der selben Tankstelle, warum ?
Gruss derBeKri