piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 21:31:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
SomeoneElse (2021-11-15 13:04:18+00:00): Just for info - I've merged the ways in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3367263 into 3131984 (it's part of the same route).
Commodoortje (2017-05-03 11:14:39+00:00): Hoi Simon,

Inderdaad de huisnummers aan dit stuk zijn 's-Gravenzandseweg
Wel heb ik de spelling op de straatnaam gecorrigeerd.
Je gebruikte " en er stond geen koppelteken tussen.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48362593
Simon Voets (2017-05-04 05:33:38+00:00): Bedankt voor je scherpte!
scai (2017-05-03 18:11:28+00:00): Hallo KommissarZufall,

statt disused=yes ist es besser einen Namensraum zu verwenden. Heißt in diesem Fall, shop=yes auf disused:shop=yes zu ändern. Das hat den Vorteil dass der Supermarkt damit nicht mehr auf der Karte erscheint und auch nicht mehr über die Suche gefunden wird. Einen geschlossenen Supermarkt anzuzeigen oder finden zu lassen ist nicht sehr nützlich.

Für mehr Informationen siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
BCNorwich (2017-05-06 06:04:20+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've amended the address and opening tags to suit OSM best practice. Regards Bernard
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
eggie (2017-05-03 11:46:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap (OSM)
Je hebt je aangemeld om een bijdrage te leveren en dat inmiddels ook gedaan. Je kunt je nu 'amateur-cartograaf' noemen; onderling gebruiken we meestal de term 'mapper';)
Elke mapper is allereerst en vooral waardevol vanwege lokale kennis. Het is juist die lokale kennis die OSM laat uitstijgen boven welk 'concurrent' dan ook. OSM is daardoor niet alleen beter, maar meestal ook veel actueler. Niet voor niets wordt OSM door veel instanties gebruikt. Daarom is het leveren van bijdragen aan OSM een serieuze zaak.
Graag aandacht voor de volgende punten:
1.	Er wordt meegekeken. In het begin worden je bijdragen bekeken door meer ervaren mappers. Ze zullen soms commentaar leveren, tips geven. Je krijgt dan automatisch een mail op het mailadres dat je bij aanmelding hebt opgegeven. Controleer dat dus regelmatig. En geef reactie op een commentaar, zodat duidelijk is dat je het hebt gelezen.
2.	Beperk jezelf. Alle begin is moeilijk en iedereen maakt fouten, zelfs de meest ervaren mappers. Maak niet meer dan een paar wijzigingen per dag in het begin. Maak niet in één sessie wijzigingen die ver uit elkaar liggen. Eventuele fouten kunnen dan snel en gemakkelijk hersteld worden.
3.	Nuttige links. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM (een introductiepagina met veel nuttige tips onder het kopje 'Waar moet je op letten als je de kaart gaat bewerken?') http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features (overzicht van vrijwel alle elementen die in OSM gebruikt worden) https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 (Nederlandstalig deel van forum; de plek om vragen te stellen en ideeën op te doen)
4.	Vragen staat vrij. Je kunt op het bovengenoemde forum terecht met vragen, maar ook altijd ondergetekende een PB sturen.
Vriendelijke groet,
Eggie
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
arcanma (2017-06-02 17:51:06+00:00): La pista ciclabile 489785838 è stata inserita senza considerare tutti gli incroci con la viabilità normale, con i dati inseriti si interpreta che c'è una pista ciclabile separata dal resto della viabilità, forse sopraelevata, transitabile solo dalle biciclette, non dai pedoni vedi (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=cycleway). Ritengo improbabile questa situazione, mi sembra più plausibile una pista ciclabile a tratti su sede separata e in alcuni tratti ricavata dalla sede stradale normale, forse utilizzabile anche dai pedoni. Se fosse così andrebbe realizzata una relazione, come ho fatto per il raccordo ciclabile di Spoleto (http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7173668), dove erano stati commessi gli stessi errori. Avendo a disposizione le informazioni con le caratteristiche dei vari tratti potrei provvedere alla sistemazione.
Marcello Arcangeli - Coordinatore OSM Umbria
ComuneDiFoligno (2017-06-05 07:41:07+00:00): In effetti la ciclabile 489785838 non esiste più (avevo solo ritoccato la posizione geografica del tratto già esistente a raccordo con la nuova viabilità di collegamento tra viale Firenze, via Pasciana, via San Giuseppe).  Più in generale, andrebbe aggiornato il sistema ciclo-pedonale di quella zona.
BCNorwich (2017-05-06 06:12:09+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I see the alteration you made to a section of the Jubilee Line is changing the layer from -3 to -5. I wonder how you came to this decision as the adjacent sections of the line remain at layer=-3, thus indicating a step of two layers? Regards Bernard
Владимир К (2017-05-17 07:14:59+00:00): для указания породы дерева есть https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:genus
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:41:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
brianboru (2017-08-14 17:12:40+00:00): This footpath seems to be mistaken for a power line?
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
Mike Baggaley (2017-05-04 17:18:21+00:00): Hi for footway 491117955, you have specified access=no, foot=yes. As all access except foot is by default no for a footway, the access=no does nothing other than cause confusion about whether you intended something different. Can you remove access=no, or did you intend something different?

Cheers,
Mike
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-03 12:37:12+00:00): I started with the buildings near the main street. I will gradually outline more buildings. If someone wants to help, contact me to avoid conflicts.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
A67-A67 (2017-05-05 19:07:13+00:00): First of all: thanks for mapping the cycling network. 

But you made one mistake. The ways should be added to a route relation (like this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7165090) and not directly to the network relation of Le Brabant Wallon à Velo. Each route relation contains a route between to nodes. I made new route relations for the ways that were in directly in the network relation.

If you do everything in the right way, the network should be visible on this map within a few minutes:
https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13!50.7138!4.8681
And within a week it should appear on the cycling layer of OpenStreetMap itself.

Good luck!
Mike Baggaley (2017-05-04 17:21:43+00:00): HI, can you clarify what type of public right of way this is, and move its detail from the name to the designation tag e.g. designation=public_footpath  (as "public right of way" is not a name)?

Thanks,
Mike
DaveF (2018-12-23 21:46:30+00:00): Hi
Why did you add Chiltern AONB boundary to ways when it's already tagged in a relation? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7129946
SiHollett (2018-12-31 15:53:04+00:00): Because it wasn't showing, and so I copied what was working on the North Wessex Downs, or the Cotswolds (I can't remember exactly which as it's been over a year) wrt tagging.
DaveF (2018-12-31 17:20:26+00:00): Hi
I'm unsure what you were expecting to see other than what's already rendered.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65917515
This is a test. Note the relation renders without the boundary tag on the way & the polygon with just the way boundary tag doesn't render at all.
SiHollett (2018-12-31 17:51:54+00:00): What *is* already rendered is not what *was* rendered when I made the change. I made the change expecting to see the boundary, which didn't previously show, and low and behold it did!

There might have been a change in the rendering engine in the 599 days since I made the changes to make my edit now moot, but it wasn't moot then!
eggie (2017-05-03 13:55:36+00:00): Graag voorzichtigheid betrachten met buslijnen. Dat is specialistenwerk.
PB met welkomstbericht gestuurd
mugthijs (2017-05-04 14:49:40+00:00): PB beantwoord
eggie (2017-05-04 15:03:54+00:00): Uitgenodigd op forum.. Verwezen naar oa. Maarten Deen
5m4u9 (2017-05-04 16:10:22+00:00): hola, gracias por colaborar en el mapa.

te acuerdas de que banco era el cajero?
eggie (2017-05-03 13:59:15+00:00): Nu staat het adres er 2x op het gebouw. Zou je de info op de adresnode willen zetten van de BAG. 
Graag reactie.
mugthijs (2017-05-04 14:49:14+00:00): Nu aangepast, beschrijving van de niet-BAG weghalen?
eggie (2017-05-04 15:02:46+00:00): correct.. de BAG is "heilig"  :)
eggie (2017-05-03 14:00:28+00:00): Welkomstmail gestuurd PB
eggie (2017-05-03 14:03:19+00:00): highway=pedestrian wordt gebruikt in voetgangersgebieden in bv winkelstraten. Is dat hier het geval?
SafwatHalaby (2017-09-11 20:24:25+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please avoid adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Bad edits were reverted.
eggie (2017-05-03 14:05:41+00:00): Hier geef je een gebouw dat bovenop een ander gebouw is gelegd adresgegevens die ook al op de adresnode staan.
Adresgegevens zetten we niet op gebouwen.
MoiraPrime (2022-04-04 22:33:02+00:00): I know I'm 5 years late on noticing this, but it appears you removed the route number from the MS 471 route relation. Was this a mistake or were you intending to do something else?
MoiraPrime (2022-04-04 23:00:15+00:00): I see at some point MS 471 got re-routed along MS 25 for that section. Is that correct? If so, I've done my best effort to try to fix the relation to match the new routing, and to fix the names on the old sections to match OSM tagging standards. Please feel free to review what I've done and let me know if the route I changed MS 471 to is correct or not.  
 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1527721
eggie (2017-05-03 14:07:44+00:00): Graag de info zetten op de BAG adresnode. Het adres komt nu 2x voor in OSM. Doe je dit zelf?
eggie (2017-05-03 14:08:22+00:00): Welkomst PB gestuurd
eggie (2017-05-03 14:27:37+00:00): 
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
MVG, 
Eggie
mueschel (2017-05-06 13:42:51+00:00): Hi,
you added many strange tags here, like these:
    EntityHand=AEB
    ExtendedEn=3 gros { FACING_3 PTE EXT } FACING_3-E01PTE 109710 38.1 0.0 5 { 0 0 0 0 }
    Layer=GROS$
    SubClasses=AcDbEntity:AcDbPolyline
What is the meaning of all this? 
Also, indoor corridors should be tagged as indoor=corridor, but not as highway=footway.

Cheers, Jan
Michi_ (2017-05-08 13:09:17+00:00): Dear Jan,

those tags descend from the shape files from which the map was created. For this reason, they will be removed as soon as possible.
The tag highway=footway is necessary to guarantee the beta navigation as Adrien Pavie suggested.

Cheers,

Michela
mmd (2017-06-03 09:10:20+00:00): Those shapefiles seem to originate from some AutoCAD files. How about the copyright status of those files? In any case, has this been discussed with the community beforehand? Are you aware of the following process? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import
Michi_ (2017-06-04 18:28:34+00:00): Dear mmd,

the shapefiles were originated from Quantum Gis software, which is open source.
Moreover the plans were officially provided from the building office of "Sapienza" University of Rome .

With my warmest regards,

Michela
mmd (2017-06-04 18:32:16+00:00): FYI: OSM Data Working Group (DWG) has already started reverting your imports as they don't adhere to OSM standards: see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49230231 as an example.
mbethke (2017-07-14 00:01:47+00:00): Sorry, I had to delete a whole bunch of buildings here, they are actually caravans.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:14:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:30:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:37:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:04:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-03 23:14:14+00:00): Hi 01719, I see you are creating/deleting/reverting a lot - do you need any help?
01719 (2017-05-04 13:38:50+00:00): Polarbear, probably - thank you. The original in OSM was a bunch of disparate areas that came from GIS - it was confusing for anyone looking at the map as this land has been called Patch Hill Conservation area for decades now. I tried to merge them together, but the new area would only show in edit mode. I tried reverting, but I ended up with just points rather than the original areas. I've now gone back over and created several new areas that are at least named correctly, even if it's not one area (Shurtleff Woods does need to remain distinct). However, even my new area is not showing - but perhaps that's because it's taking some time to create newly rendered tiles. I was going to let it settle for a few days and see what happens - I shouldn't have screwed with the GIS areas, but would like to provide a map that reflects the contiguous conservation area. Thank you for reaching out.
Polarbear-repair (2017-05-08 17:52:24+00:00): Yes new tile rendering can take anything between minutes and days, depending on server load and other circumstances. 
If you uploaded them from your editor and tagged them correctly, just be patient. 
If you click in such a list here on an existing way, you will get the outline in a layer above the tiles, so you can see things are there.
01719 (2017-05-08 17:59:33+00:00): Thank you - it's there now - took a few days which surprised me.
Polarbear (2017-05-08 19:13:57+00:00): Well, for the re-rendered tiles to be updated in your browser, you also need to force-refresh the browser cache, Shift-Reload in Mozilla browsers.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:12:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:24:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
danvyr (2017-05-18 07:02:10+00:00): access=no запрещает всем пользоваться этой дорогой, зачем его ставить на пешеходные дорожки?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
Yaugen (2017-05-18 07:07:22+00:00): О какой дорожке идет речь?
danvyr (2017-05-18 07:21:10+00:00): например вот об этой https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83986716/history
я там уже всё исправил, но можно посмотреть историю
Yaugen (2017-05-18 07:30:12+00:00): насколько я понимаю, access=no запрещает доступ всем, кроме явно указанных. У меня было выставлено yes для велосипедистов и всем, кто на ногах.
Тэг yes разрешает доступ всем, кому явно не указано, что нельзя.
danvyr (2017-05-18 08:24:09+00:00): А кто по пешеходной дорожке ещё сможет проехать? Автомобиль навигатор не пустит туда просто потому что это пешеходная дорожка.
Как правило на дороге запрещают тот транспорт, который на ней может проехать, если это нужно. Например на некоторых автодорогах в городе стоит запрет на велосипед. Ну и в англ вики немного более полно об использовании этого тега https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
mavl (2018-12-25 20:32:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:37:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
BCNorwich (2017-05-03 16:10:47+00:00): Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I've tidied up the buildings and removed the fiction parks.
mavl (2018-12-25 19:25:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:22:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:48:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:25:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:42:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:47:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:27:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:54:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:39:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:32:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:22:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:43:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:51:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:40:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].