piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Polarbear-repair (2021-10-05 20:55:03+00:00): Dear komoot user, 
based on which evidence have you declared 6 residential roads as unusable for bicycles? This would mean that all residents cannot access their houses by bike, which I cannot imagine. In particular as a previous mapper has assigned rcn=yes, i.e. declaring them part of a regional cycle network.
Polarbear-repair (2021-10-21 15:44:47+00:00): This changeset was reverted in 112798461 where the comment is:
DE: revert implausible bicycle=no from residential roads in an area with ca 150 residential homes whch are certainly not all controlled by one landowner.
Polarbear-repair (2021-10-21 15:45:02+00:00): DWG Ticket#2021092710000081
Access Claims (komoot) (2021-10-25 12:31:45+00:00): Dear Polarbear-Repair,
Thank you for your comment. In this case we made the changes to the residential area by mistake. Our editor intended to make the changes to certain paths of the camping ground based on information provided by the owner of the camping. Unfortunately, the changes were made to the residential area which should not have been targeted. Thank you for reverting the changes and please excuse the mistake.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-16 10:16:16+00:00): Hello again Simseva,
Whatever https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855634609 is, it does not look like an office to me.  You've added 638 of these across the US and Canada http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1c7k , and we will need to undo those changes.
People have also asked you about some of your other changes, for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109427923 , and you have not replied. You can see a full list of comments at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5697119 .
If you can explain why we should keep some of your other changes we may be able to keep them, but if you don't reply we mayhave to undo them all.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
Negreheb (2025-07-20 11:22:33+00:00): Servus, weisst du zufällig noch, wo du die note=* -Hausnamen herhast? Sind die von einem Adressimport eines gelöschten Users, kann das sein? Hab im österreich-Chat mal nachgefragt, die (also einer bisher :D ) wären auch eher für housename, wenns wirklich vom Import her kommt und sonst nirgends zu finden sind, würde ich persönlich die sogar glatt löschen.
gebux (2025-07-21 13:40:16+00:00): In einer sehr frühen Version der von luzandro aufbereiteten BEV-Daten waren diese Adresszusätze als addr:housename drin. Beautifulplaces oder wie auch immer er sich damals nannte, hat diese Daten dann großflächig in AT importiert, immer nach dem gleichen Muster vorgehend:

Erst alle vorhandenen Adressen löschen, dann die Adressen wieder als Punkte aus dem BEV-Daten einfügen. 

Ich habe die Daten aus den Adresspunkten wieder an die Gebäudeumrisse gepappt und addr:housename zu note transformiert, damit diese unkontrollierten Daten nicht mehr ganz so prominent gerendert werden. Mangels Ortskenntnis kann ich nicht sagen ob z.B. dieses Gebäude wirklich noch als 'SAUSCHNEIDERGEUSCHE' bekannt ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243866815
Negreheb (2025-07-21 13:51:00+00:00): Danke für die Antwort! Hm, sind jetzt nicht mehr drinnen. Spricht von deiner Seite her was dagegen das zu löschen? Soll ich im Forum einen Thread aufmachen und schauen? Oder einfach gut sein lassen? (Alles okay für mich :D )
pesec (2021-09-01 05:22:17+00:00): Старайтесь, чтобы названия правок отражали суть вносимых изменений.
Kovoschiz (2021-09-01 06:06:58+00:00): This is actually also a historic structure. The `shop=mall` should be tagged on a new area for the entire site, not this building.
NanMadol (2021-09-02 10:59:17+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz, thank you for the additional info here! You mention that there is a larger site here, what should be included in the mall polygon? Thanks for the help!
kapazao (2021-08-31 12:58:34+00:00): Hola, ¿qué es lo que estás haciendo aquí?
Por favor indica con buenos comentarios los cambios, "mapa poniente" no ayuda en nada a revisar.
Por otra parte eliminaste un etiquetado incorrectamente sin motivo, ten cuidado con ello porque es importante.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110507269
Frans S (2021-09-01 14:11:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. ( most, 11 out of 15, are not squared.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110507498
GeorgeKaplan (2024-06-09 15:07:37+00:00): Bonjour, est-ce qu’il y a une page de discussion de cet import ? J’ai une question particulière sur ses données.
Landry GAIFFE (2024-06-09 15:13:17+00:00): Bonjour, je ne crois pas. Je l'avais fait à ce moment-là sans trop avoir conscience des problèmes des imports
Landry GAIFFE (2024-06-09 15:27:45+00:00): Pour rapidement développer, j'avais importé ces données car elles étaient plus à jour et plus complètes que ce qu'il y avait dans OSM. J'avais essayé de veiller malgré tout à conserver les informations supplémentaires ajoutées par d'autres contributeurs comme les arbres à valeur historique, les descriptions associées ou les noms particuliers. Je n'avais alors pas encore conscience de l'importance de l'historique dans le projet. Je m'étais d'ailleurs fait tapé un peu sur les doigts pour un import en Bretagne avec le cadastre et l'importation surtout de tout un tas d'adresse manquantes (et c'est là que j'ai pris conscience du problème des imports et du pourquoi je n'en fais plus maintenant). Quant aux donnés, j'ai récemment fait une conversion car j'ai reçu un commentaire me disant que les valeurs n'étaient pas bonnes et qu'il fallait les convertir, afin que l'échelle soit correcte
GeorgeKaplan (2024-06-09 15:35:39+00:00): J’ai vu un autre problème. Tous ces objets disposent de la clé non documentée "domanialite", ce qui est à proscrire car non réutilisable.
D’après les 2 valeurs (alignement ou jardin), je comprends qu’elle indique si l’arbre fait partie d’un alignement ou non au sens de la mairie de Paris. Je constate qu’il y a systématiquement la clé "denotation" qui décrit la même chose. Je propose donc de simplement supprimer les tags domanialite sur tous les objets de ce changeset, OK avec ça ?
Landry GAIFFE (2024-06-09 16:17:25+00:00): Oh, en effet, vous avez tout à fait raison. Je m'en charge dans une dizaine de jours, peut-être un peu avant, lorsque mes examens seront terminés. Je tâcherai de vous le notifier lorsque ce sera fait !
GeorgeKaplan (2024-06-10 18:53:53+00:00): Ce n’est pas nécessaire, je viens de le faire.
Landry GAIFFE (2024-06-12 13:51:07+00:00): C'est noté. Dans ce cas, merci !
Leo Slager (2021-08-31 17:26:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
rthik007 (2021-09-01 11:23:02+00:00): "Hi mahafi,
I have removed  all untagged ways which were created.
as these are not necessary in navigation
way 978118355
way 978118354
way 978118353
way 978118363
way 978118362
way 978118359
way 978118361
way 978118358
way 978118360
way 978118357
way 978118356
way 978118365
way 978118364
Kindly check with ,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110561567.
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110508781
Dawid2849 (2021-08-31 12:30:23+00:00): maxweight=30 i maxgcweight=40? Znacznik maxgcweight chyba do skasowania.
kubahahaha (2021-08-31 13:14:32+00:00): Przeoczyłem. Usunę z domu, ale to chyba bezużyteczny znacznik
Baloo Uriza (2021-09-02 15:54:25+00:00): Isn't 44 through Lawton toll-free?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110509622
user_3022894 (2021-10-16 19:31:01+00:00): Hallo astrozyte,
um vielleicht noch kurz deine kleine Frage im Änderungssatz zu beantworten: Ja, genau, richtig, das sieht sehr gut aus, wie du den Altkleidercontainer hier eingetragen hast. das Tagging ist in Ordnung.

Vielleicht noch eine kleine Sache: Wenn ich mir das Luftbild so anschaue, dann ist doch wahrscheinlich eher dieses kleine rote Quadrat der Container, oder? Weil du hattest hier glaube ich eine zuvor als Gebäude getaggte Fläche in den Container umgewandelt.

Wenn das Gebäude nicht zufällig abgerissen sein sollte, würde ich die Fläche, die derzeit in OSM als Container markiert ist, eher wieder als Gebäude taggen und für den Altkleidercontainer dann einen Punkt nehmen (reicht in der Regel aus, außer du möchtest es explizit als Fläche haben).

Welches Objekt genau der Container ist frage ich nur deswegen so genau nach, weil mir diese rote Fläche auf dem Luftbild so spezifisch nach Container aussieht...

Ansonsten freut es mich sehr, dass du auf so etwas in der Umgebung hier geachtet hast,
viele Grüße
Lukas
Commodoortje (2021-08-31 17:19:24+00:00): Inventieve manier om je vraag te stellen. Deze vraag zal door weinig mappers gelezen worden, en vraag dan ook om in de toekomst op dit draadje de vragen van Veiligheidsregio's te plaatsen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73716
Commodoortje (2021-08-31 17:19:54+00:00): Het antwoord op je vragen is in dit YouTube filmpje uitgelegd.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqnkIdyNe6Q
EJlol (2021-09-01 06:57:51+00:00): Let er wel op dat de eerste forum reacties van nieuwe accounts handmatig goedgekeurd worden om spam te voorkomen. Dit betekent dat het even duurt voordat ze zichtbaar op het forum worden.
Commodoortje (2021-09-01 19:35:50+00:00): Er wordt goed meegedacht op het forum, en er zijn een aantal nuttige tags voorgesteld, en de reden waarom.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=839558#p839558
Константин Гам (2021-09-06 14:23:04+00:00): You make service road -> living_street, but in Russia its difference. 
highway=service + living_street != highway=living_street

Please be a careful
Jakka (2021-09-01 09:40:49+00:00): de tag access=no is een erg vergaand verbod voor alles en iedereen, je moet dan elk afzonderlijk middel toevoegen.
Meestal bepaald het type weg reeds wat er op mag.Zie welkom bericht, staan er verbodsborden dan extra *=no
zorglubu (2021-09-01 12:51:14+00:00): Bonjour,
La correction est parfaite mais attention à ne pas laisser le croisillon #mbx_france_roads  sur toutes vos modifications :-)

Bien cordialement.
KVI0n (2021-09-01 13:04:47+00:00): Bonjour)))
 Merci pour votre commentaire!!! 
Si quelque part mes corrections sont incorrectes, j'apprécierais que vous me corrigiez. 
Cordialement Liliya!
Gonéo (2021-08-31 13:05:32+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vois que tu as demandé une validation. Si tu confirmes que ces 2 sections de la rue sont à double-sens alors la modification est correcte.
Suggestion : quand tu envoies la modification avec ID tu peux ajouter source=survey qui indiques que tu as vérifié l'info sur le terrain.
ducktor69 (2021-08-31 14:54:01+00:00): Bonjour,
merci de l'information.
user_1566574 (2021-10-01 12:43:28+00:00): Cet objet n'est plus une fontaine ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54181734

(« Oh, j'ai connu le temps où c'était une fontaine... »)
2p2m (2021-10-02 06:01:44+00:00): Ah oui, une jolie fontaine... qui débordait de mousse de lessive les lendemains de belles soirées d'été !
Cela fait au moins 2 ans qu'elle a été transformée en bac à fleurs !
Mais un projet de réfection de toutes les places du centre-ville est en cours, alors patience...
user_1566574 (2021-10-02 07:02:59+00:00): Tiens, le mode de vie du Haut-Doubs s'exporte. Pontarlier aussi avait une fontaine, qui moussait, pour les mêmes raisons... :') Je ne crois pas l'avoir connue cependant.
Frans S (2021-09-01 14:09:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key ( non of your mappings are squared.)
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110512871
ToniE (2021-08-31 12:48:04+00:00): Servus Manuel,

die Radroute "Auf den Spuren von König Ludwig" hat hier nun leider eine Lücke, weißt du wo die lang geht?

Gruß,
Toni
Manuel Schwarzenberger (2021-08-31 15:52:10+00:00): Wie der letzte Erkunder geschrieben hat über die beiden nördlichen Forstwege.
Frans S (2021-09-01 14:08:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Don't map the yard next to a building as part of the building.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110513207
kapazao (2021-08-31 13:01:57+00:00): Hola, no sé si sabes que puedes usar la capa de Catastro de España para añadir los edificios, así lo podrás hacer con mayor precisión y no habrá que corregirlo después.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110513288
brust84 (2021-08-31 12:46:17+00:00): noexit*
Tomas Straupis (2021-08-31 15:10:59+00:00): Na ne, čia pastatų pavadinimai. Kam reikia juos perkelinėti į bet kaip sukurtus landuse?
Tomas Straupis (2021-08-31 15:13:04+00:00): Plius anksčiau jie ir adresą turėjo, o dabar pavadinimas vienoj vietoj, adresai - kitoj.
Leo Slager (2021-08-31 17:32:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
hu9o (2021-09-02 14:10:30+00:00): Bonjour Alban, pourquoi avoir retiré ces arceaux vélo ? ils sont pourtant toujours existant.
Alban37 (2021-09-03 18:32:42+00:00): Salut,
Une personne de geovelo avait signalé me semble-t-il leur disparition. Mais j’avais supprimé la note avant de supprimer l’objet. J’ai donc pu commettre une erreur et supprimer le mauvais parking à vélo. Heureusement tu veilles au grain. Lol
Merci de ton intervention. Si tu ne l’a pas fait encore tu peux les réactiver dans le doute. Cdlt alban
Frans S (2021-09-01 14:06:19+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped.
You mapped a number of trees as a building. 
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110515153
Hanan Tikveša (2021-08-31 23:17:38+00:00): Hi
why did you put the "gravel street" name on a lot of roads?
i removed those names in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110535218
please don't do something similar like this anymore.
Leo Slager (2021-08-31 17:33:52+00:00): Top. Goed dat je dat zelf verbeterd hebt.
totera (2021-08-31 23:06:40+00:00): Ciao gigi2037, qual è l'utilità di queste modifiche con cui aggiungi prima e ultima fermata delle linee non preoccupandoti di tutto quello che c'è in mezzo (peraltro non avendo conoscenza diretta spesso sbagli pure come in questo caso), a parte accontentare OSM Inspector?
gigi2037 (2021-09-01 05:20:26+00:00): Ciao di solito metto insieme le relazioni con gap e poi guardo la linea di trasporto della città le fermate le aggingo in basea dove inizia le relazione e finisce.
rthik007 (2021-09-01 08:34:11+00:00): "HI Ugamcgib,
Fix the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential roads
Kindly check with,
WAY: 697891826
WAY: 628228499
WAY: 697891673
WAY: 697891673
WAY: 697891809
Remove the connectivity of buildings to the residential roads
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110516359
rthik007 (2021-09-01 08:27:08+00:00): "HI Ugamcgib,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential roads
way 698807589
Kindly check with,
way 725258874
way 624991683
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110551532.
Thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110516406
rthik007 (2021-09-01 08:22:32+00:00): "HI Sybille F ,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential roads
way 656673028
way 656673027
way 656648374
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110551227.
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110516475
rthik007 (2021-09-01 08:17:42+00:00): "HI Emilie OA ,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential roads
way 698807589
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110550971.
Thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110516517
Laci (2021-08-31 14:04:33+00:00): Danke. Auch die anderen Geschäfte in der Innenstadt müssten aktualisiert werden, viele sind mittlerweile geschlossen worden
sportskanone85 (2021-08-31 19:26:29+00:00): Das ist mir bekannt und wurde von dir im Hinweis 2019597 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2019597) bereits festgehalten. Da die Anpassung etwas aufwendiger ist und etwas mehr Recherche benötigt, habe ich damit noch nicht angefangen.
Dieser Änderungssatz beinhaltet daher ausschlielich die Ergänzung des Handyladens.
skorasaurus (2021-09-01 20:45:17+00:00): hi janiceg, 

thanks for editing and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edits look great so far. 

I would suggest to use the OSIP 6 inch aerial imagery layer, it is newer than the bing imagery . 

https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer has details how to change it. 

if you have any questions about editing, feel free to ask and welcome again and thanks for editing. 

-will in cleveland.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110517459
JaniceG (2021-09-02 00:46:12+00:00): Thanks Will! I tried changing the background to OSIP 6 inch aerial, but it is older than the Bing for the University Circle area (the Nord Family Greenway project is the area that I use to see what's updated.)
skorasaurus (2021-09-02 20:57:07+00:00): Oh, thank you for correcting me and sharing that! The bing imagery has been updated and I wasn't aware of it! (OSM doesn't announce when imagery layers are updated and the updates are random, arbitrary, and OSM has no control when imagery is updated, it's all done by the provider)
rthik007 (2021-09-01 07:59:05+00:00): "HI Sybille F,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential roads
way 656673028
way 627943862
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110544826.
Thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110517547
rthik007 (2021-09-01 06:08:02+00:00): "HI americaone,
I have removed the unnecessary layer=1 tag to the highway and also Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential roads
way 697077525
way 799720014
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110543803.
Thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110517664
Strubbl (2021-09-11 16:03:48+00:00): Hi lbacc, are you sure the hydrant does not exist anymore? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1698262125/history
It was an underground one.
lonelyviper (2021-09-11 20:27:08+00:00): Hi Strubbl, 

sorry, I didn‘t realize. I was looking at ground level amenities.

Thanks for noticing. I‘m pretty new here, how do I cancel this specific edit?

Cheers,
Leon
Strubbl (2021-09-11 23:57:37+00:00): Hi Leon,

thanks for confirming. There are several ways to undelete an object, but it's not that straight-forward. Please see the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Undoing_deletions
I just did the undelete for that specific hydrant with the JOSM undelete plugin, because i saw you were using Go Map on a mobile. So you don't need to that anymore.

I reverted the deletion of that object in changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111079933

Near the underground hydrant there's always a sign like the one in the example for the diameter in the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Dfire_hydrant
You can also see the metal cap of the underground hydrant if you search for it on the floor. It's not that easy to spot compared to a pillar, but once you spot them, you see them everywhere :)

Best Regards,
Sven
rthik007 (2021-09-01 06:02:07+00:00): "HI Stacy Holmes,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential roads
way 646272073
way 646272074
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110543552.
Thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110517880
SomeoneElse (2021-09-19 12:41:16+00:00): Hello clementader,

On this changeset you added a "source=Google Maps" tag on the sand here.  We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
We'll need to revert and redact this change, and any others where you've used Google Maps as a source.  What I'd suggest that you do is contact other members of the French OSM community and ask them which imagery they think is most up to date here - and it looks like this sandbank might also be visible from the road.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2021-09-19 12:41:52+00:00): Bonjour clémentade,

Sur cet ensemble de modifications, vous avez ajouté une balise "source=Google Maps" sur le sable ici. Nous ne pouvons pas réellement l'utiliser comme source dans OSM car la licence de Google ne permet pas de l'utiliser ici - cela poserait de réels problèmes au projet si nous utilisions Google Maps comme source.
Nous devrons annuler et supprimer cette modification, ainsi que toutes les autres pour lesquelles vous avez utilisé Google Maps comme source. Ce que je vous suggère de faire, c'est de contacter d'autres membres de la communauté OSM française et de leur demander quelles images ils pensent être les plus à jour ici - et il semble que ce banc de sable soit également visible depuis la route.

Meilleures salutations
Andy Townsend, au nom du groupe de travail sur les données de l'OSM
DressyPear4 (2021-08-31 15:15:44+00:00): Adicione apenas o que existe.
Edição removida.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110517945
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-08-31 14:33:47+00:00): Dear local editor:
This fix is to make those points have a more wildly used tag value.
You'd better use lowercase character and underline to create a value or key.

Thanks.