piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Baloo Uriza (2015-09-03 16:24:42+00:00): Please use addr:unit=* for the suite number and E.123 International Notation for the phone number (ie, +1-800-555-1212)
Papibaquígrafo (2016-05-01 00:14:09+00:00): Neste changeset, você adicionou a tag leisure=nature_reserve na APA da Baleia Franca. Porém, a convenção da comunidade é não usar esta tag em APA. Vide artigo "Unidades de conservação" na wiki.
adrianojbr (2016-05-01 00:49:03+00:00): não foi o que eu entendi, com base nessa página: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Unidades_de_conserva%C3%A7%C3%A3o. na seção sobre "etiquetas para unidades de conservação" há a sugestão de usar leisure=nature_reserve e sugere usar protect_class=5. o que eu entendi errado?
adrianojbr (2016-05-01 00:50:39+00:00): já entendi. vc tem razão. "Omitir esta tag para UCs do tipo 'área de proteção ambiental'."

corrigirei. abraço.
Papibaquígrafo (2016-05-01 15:51:34+00:00): Obrigado pela resposta! A idéia é que em função da grande extensão das APAs e do fato de que elas englobam propriedade privada com fins diversos, não faz sentido incluir o leisure=nature_reserve nelas.
maraf24 (2015-09-03 21:49:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368835323
Skąd ta kaplica? 
Tak to wygląda teraz https://goo.gl/maps/nMDwp
Władysław Komorek (2015-09-03 22:39:27+00:00): Geoportal.
PS. Bazowanie na danych z Google narusza prawo licencyjne i jest zabronione na OSM.
maraf24 (2015-09-03 23:00:11+00:00): Czyli Geoportal ma mocno nieaktualne informacje. Wprowadzanie danych wątpliwych i nie zweryfikowanych nie jest za bardzo zgodne z zasadami osm, prawda?
Ja nie bazuję na danych Google, bo te tereny dobrze znam. 
PS Oglądanie zdjęć na GSV nie narusza prawa licencyjnego, bo one zostały dobrowolnie przez Googla udostępnione właśnie po to, by je oglądać. A do obiektów, które uwiecznił na zdjęciach, Google nie ma żadnych praw.
SomeoneElse (2017-08-01 18:18:39+00:00): Hi will,
Quick question - does the edit to the location of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3726792237/history after your change look OK to you?
Best Regards,
Andy
will_p (2017-08-02 11:21:02+00:00): It appears that the whole roundabout was moved rather than just the traffic signals. Everything was shifted roughly 2 metres to the west. Looking at GPS traces I think the original position was slightly more accurate, but it's probably too minor to worry about.
SomeoneElse (2017-08-02 12:57:21+00:00): OK, Thanks.
ViriatoLusitano (2015-09-03 00:16:02+00:00): Just noticed I've been using my main account, oops!
ViriatoLusitano (2015-09-03 00:15:45+00:00): Context: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33763244
maraf24 (2015-09-05 20:02:49+00:00): Niby nie ma w Ziębicach Polnej 17b  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226558735/history - a jednak jest w KRS http://www.krs-online.com.pl/przedsiebiorstwo-wielobranzowe-koliber-krs-630368.html
Himké (2015-09-16 03:51:40+00:00): "Do not split up the link into one part belonging to one road and one to the other with different classifications. This makes it more difficult to find out which roads a link is supposed to connect." 
cf http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
Jim Johansen (2015-12-11 06:24:47+00:00): Digitized parks using aerial.
Jim Johansen (2015-12-11 06:25:09+00:00): Digitized park using aerial.
Jim Johansen (2015-12-11 06:29:44+00:00): Parking lot road and Honeycutt classification.
Jim Johansen (2015-12-11 06:30:44+00:00): Turn rules from parking lot.
Jim Johansen (2015-12-11 06:31:29+00:00): Classified and speed limit.
Jim Johansen (2015-12-11 06:33:24+00:00): Classification.
Jim Johansen (2015-12-11 06:34:02+00:00): Bus driveway.
Firefishy (2015-09-08 21:26:51+00:00): Removed the name of the house. We'd have a lot of "My Houses" if everyone did that. ;-)

Cheers
Grant
redd (2023-04-01 12:54:13+00:00): Hi Lübeck,
vielen Dank für deine lange Mitarbeit bei OpenStreetMap!

Bei den genus:de=g Änderungen scheint jeweils ein Fehler passiert zu sein.. Könntest du das bitte nochmal prüfen?

Vielen Dank, 
redd
SomeoneElse (2015-09-03 20:57:39+00:00): Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367243493 is really all one building?  My recollection is that it's not but actually several, and that Sowters Row is not enclosed for most or all of its length.  Have a look at the imagery without the data at http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=19/53.23560/-1.42759 if that makes it clearer.  If you think that something is incorrect, perhaps add a note explaining what and why so that a local mapper (there are about 3 locally, including me) could go and check?  I certainly wouldn't want to make changes to a dense urban area without an on-the-ground survey.  There's some other likely misplaced and misspelt stuff here too that could be checked at the same time (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/350316199 isn't in the middle of the road, for example).
SomeoneElse (2015-09-09 00:19:17+00:00): For info, I've fixed the buildings on Sowters Row and Palmersgate from survey in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33896631 .
AMDmi3 (2015-09-04 18:31:46+00:00): Исправил после вас этот объект.
* Номер телефона - contact:phone а не addr:housenumber
* Номер дома - addr:housenumber, а не addr:street
* Название улицы нужно писать полностью
AMDmi3 (2015-09-04 18:48:48+00:00): Удалил адрес, т.к. он вообще не принадлежит данному объекту.
Кухарский Павел (2015-09-04 18:56:16+00:00): Адрес принадлежит Дирекции ООПТ ЛО, которая и установила щит. Тел. тоже организации.
AMDmi3 (2015-09-06 17:56:58+00:00): Я понял. Но это не адрес щита, и на этой точке ему делать нечего.
Warin61 (2018-12-04 03:19:12+00:00): Hi,
On Way: 368892427 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
BCNorwich (2018-12-04 07:33:46+00:00): Hi,
Sorry about that, you are correct and I've changed it.
It came about by my separating the scrub area from the meadow area, (which was one self intersecting meadow polygon). Thus initially making it into two landuse=meadow areas, I changed the tag value of the small area but forgot to change the tag key.

Regards Bernard
maraf24 (2015-09-03 19:45:30+00:00): Teren przedszkola oznaczamy przez amenity=kindergarten i tam też powinna być nazwa tego przedszkola, a nie na budynku.
GerdP (2015-11-26 14:01:14+00:00): Hi there!
I've noticed that you've removed most ways tagged with highway=tour.
Just one remained:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368900732
maraf24 (2015-09-03 19:44:25+00:00): Tu jest tylko dodana nazwa do budynku, przedszkola wciąż nie oznaczono.
Piotr Strębski (2019-04-25 12:26:45+00:00): Hej! A co to za budynek? Nie ma go na żadnym zdjęciu lotniczym, nie mówiąc już o rzeczywistości: znam tę okolicę jak własną kieszeń (mieszkam niedaleko): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368901255#map=19/52.28293/20.98919&layers=N
kocio (2019-04-25 13:40:35+00:00): Już wywaliłem. Kiedyś musiał być, bo sam bym go nie wymyślił, pewnie widać go było na poprzednim podkładzie - zresztą trawniki dokoła tez się inaczej układały:

https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/5439713/56740052-6cbf8680-6770-11e9-9de7-8cb7440f2eab.png
Piotr Strębski (2019-04-25 17:39:25+00:00): Dzięki, ja nie chciałem tego ruszać, wolałem wpierw spytać, bo kształt ten może miał być jakimś podziemnym schronem/silosem/itp. choć bez znacznika podziemności. Zwłaszcza ta ścieżka widoczna na Twoim załączniku, przebiegająca po budynku, była znacząca. Pozdrawiam serdecznie!
kocio (2019-04-25 17:43:48+00:00): Fajnie, dzięki za kontakt! :-)
mavl (2015-09-03 18:04:24+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Ваши действия непонятны. Зачем было удалять правильный дом http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43276166/history и на его место ставить такой же дом, но с кривыми углами? (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43276166/368902037)

Это многоквартирный дом (16 этажей), а вы ему поставили тег building=house (Индивидуальный жилой дом для проживания одной, реже двух, семей.) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building

Магазин «Магнит-Косметик» обозначен как супермаркет и при этом находится внутри многоквартирного дома. Такого не может быть. Супермаркет - это большой магазин. Например, в Тюмени это «Лента» или «Окей». Надо выбрать другой тег для этого магазина. http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3727410589
mavl (2015-09-03 18:28:13+00:00): Правильная ссылка http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368902037/history
MarcoR (2015-12-13 20:35:41+00:00): Malafrasca è il nome della via o della zona?
YarNik (2015-10-20 19:17:20+00:00): Цвяньковець вулиця - улица ни с чем не соединена
Cascafico (2015-09-03 11:51:42+00:00): come per gli altri import "corposi" ci saranno diverse hioghway da rinominare coerentemente. [OSMinspector](http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=addresses&lon=13.48744&lat=45.89236&zoom=13&overlays=buildings,buildings_with_addresses,postal_code,entrances_deprecated,entrances,no_addr_street,street_not_found,nodes_with_addresses_defined,nodes_with_addresses_interpolated,interpolation,interpolation_errors,connection_lines,nearest_points,nearest_roads,nearest_areas)
KKS (2015-09-05 01:21:41+00:00): Привіт, додавати тег шляху на кожну точку шляху не треба, причому це й не є правильною.
glglgl (2015-09-08 05:49:10+00:00): Die bauliche Trennung ist hier allerdings auf 70 m unterbrochen...
harmor (2015-09-08 11:02:57+00:00): Die Fahrbahnen sind mit Flachbordsteinen und einer erhöhten Verbundsteinfläche getrennt.
Diese soll und darf, wie auch die Grasfläche, nicht überfahren werden!
TheSwavu (2015-09-03 11:04:57+00:00): Thanks reverter plugin..the source was not ABS2011.
maraf24 (2015-09-03 20:11:51+00:00): Bardzo krzywe budynku.
Naciśnięcie S w edytorze prostuje kąty budynku.
Nakaner (2015-09-12 18:27:21+00:00): Bitte nutze nicht fremde Datenbanken – und sei es eine Filialdatenbank von Markant, Edeka, Lidl, Shell o.ä. Wir haben dafür nicht die Erlaubnis, diese zu nutzen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:FAQ#Welche_Bilder_und_Karten_darf_ich_verwenden.2C_um_davon_Karten_zu_erstellen.3F
GrafzuAdelheide (2015-09-17 11:11:58+00:00): Habe den Makel der Daten behoben, indem ich alle Daten vom öffentlich einsehbaren Firmenschild abgelesen habe.

Ist nicht unbedingt intuitiv, das Datenbank-Urheberrecht. Zumal alle Informationen darin ja öffentlich sind. Insofern bezweifele ich, dass eine Stammdatenbank so etwas wie Schöpfungshöhe besitzt. Aber sicher ist sicher.

Danke für die Kritik insofern!

Gruß
GzA
Baloo Uriza (2015-09-03 15:42:57+00:00): Moving this to note 428030.
mueschel (2022-09-01 18:22:06+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du hier mal nach der Adresse schauen? Das Gebäude hat ein merkwürdiges "addr:pa" Tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368929664
wejoe (2022-09-02 09:45:43+00:00): Habe Flüchtigkeitsfehler behoben, sollte heißen "addr:place"
AgusQui (2015-09-03 18:27:54+00:00): Este cambio está mal hecho, una cosa es la Ciudad de Vicente López, que es lo mismo que el partido de Vicente López, y otra es el barrio de Vicente López que está dentro del partido/ciudad con nombre homónimo.
AgusQui (2015-09-03 18:30:19+00:00): Además Olivos es un barrio, no una localidad, y se lo considera la cabecera del partido
eggie (2019-03-17 07:47:43+00:00): Ik heb higway=tertiary verwijderd van de skeelerbaan en Leisure track weer toegevoegd als vlak. Dat noemen we mappen voor de renderer omdat het er zo mooi uitziet.
Je moet maar eens kijken over een aantal dagen of het wat geworden is.
Toch wonderlijk dat je je commentaar ikk4591 in al die jaren nooit hebt aangepast. Hopelijk doe je dit voortaan wel. 
MVG,
Eggie
Nesim (2015-09-05 09:10:29+00:00): Bu çalışmanızda eklediğiniz Sağlık ocağı için kullandığınız Hastane Bölgesi etiketi yerine klinik  şeklinde olursa guruplandırma açısında daha iyi oluyor. Biz Türkiye genelinde sağlık ocaklarını klinik şeklinde ekliyoruz.
Nuri U (2015-09-05 09:20:38+00:00): Merhaba, öneri ve uyarınız için teşekkür ederim. Bundan sonra dikkat ederim.
drazde (2019-11-03 10:46:52+00:00): Ciao, riusciresti a dare anche un'altitudine?
NostradamusVilligianus (2019-11-04 12:22:00+00:00): Ciao la prossima volta che ci andiamo, prendo il viewranger e provo di dare un'altezza.
Punta Tose delle Plozze è il punto più alto dove ci si può calare in corda doppia per ripetere la via "Lo chiamavano Stihl"
drazde (2019-11-05 14:06:32+00:00): Ok, sto cercando di dare un'altezza a tutte le vette (trentine) che hanno un nome, ma non un altitudine

Se riesci ad aggiornare bene ;)
vovan__l (2015-09-07 18:00:55+00:00): Привіт. Змінюючи назву вулиці недостатньо змінити тільки тег name,ви залишили не зміненими name:ru,name:uk,name:en на цьому веї,нічого не змінили у зв'язку вулиці і залишили старі addr:street на будинках.Таким чином вулиця випала з адресного пошуку.Надалі дотримуйтесь правил адресації.Рекомендую використовувати JOSM він зручніший і має набагато більше можливостей
rozoom (2015-09-07 18:14:59+00:00): Вітаю! Дякую за коментар й поради - як виявляється я не знав певні нюанси, про які тепер знаю й буду враховувати надалі ;)
vovan__l (2015-09-07 18:20:25+00:00): Будь ласка.Чапаєва і Белінського я виправив, можеш подивитись як воно повинно виглядати.
bielebog (2015-09-13 14:14:42+00:00): Hallo Ernesti,

ich bin bielebog, OSM-Mapper aus Paderborn, und ich bin gerade über Deine Änderungen speziell in Paderborn-Elsen an der Sander Straßegestoßen. Deine Eintragungen sind eine Bereicherung der Daten in der Openstreetmap. 

Ein paar Details sind an den Eintragungen noch zu optimieren. So hast Du Details ins Name-Tag eingetragen, für die es nicht gedacht ist. Diese Häuser sind in Elsen sicher nicht als "die 10-Parteien-Häuser" bekannt. Ebenso die Garagen nicht als die "n Garaschen".

building=apartments
und
building=garages

reichen da aus.

Die Garagen kann man noch aufteilen in die verschiedenen Abschnitte, dann ist auch ersichtlich, wie viele das sind.

Wie man die Tatsache, dass es sich bei den Häusern um jeweils Häuser für 10 Parteien handelt, einträgt, weiss ich gerade auch nicht. So etwas kann man in dem Fall einfach mal als Notiz an das Objekt packen. 

Also das name="10 Parteien Haus" ändern in ein "note="10 Parteien"

Grüße,

 bielebog
Nakaner (2015-12-26 13:27:13+00:00): Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz den Metro von shop=wholesale auf shop=supermarket umgetaggt. Dem kann ich nicht zustimmen. Der Metro richtet sich nicht an Privatkunden (ohne Kundenkarte kommt man da nicht rein). Es handelt sich daher nicht um einen Supermarkt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25056931/history https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3ATag%3Ashop%3Dwholesale

Bitte beachte, dass es für Telefon- und Faxnummern eine vorgeschriebene Syntax gibt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
user_6110846 (2017-12-14 06:39:04+00:00): что такое тег в Коростень горсовете бундари тест ?
mueschel (2015-09-08 17:54:45+00:00): Hi brulec,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368944169
This way has many strange keys. Could you check if this was an error?
Cheers, Jan
brulec (2015-09-08 17:59:03+00:00): fixed
mueschel (2015-09-08 18:01:30+00:00): That was fast ;-)
I found another one: 368944211
Cheers
eggie (2021-02-01 11:18:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
naoliv (2015-09-03 17:04:58+00:00): Eraldo, coloque o nome das ruas só com a primeira leitra em maiúsculo, e não com todas da forma que você inseriu.
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
Hjart (2015-09-22 06:23:35+00:00): Dette har medført dobbelte adressenoder vest for Hoptrup (ved Slivsø)
Hjart (2015-10-26 08:36:34+00:00): Dette rettesæt har medført et stort antal duplikerede adresser omkring bl.a. Vojens, Herning og Hanstholm (se https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=33775423). Medmindre du har andre forslag vil jeg revertere.
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
Thomas8122 (2015-09-04 06:46:10+00:00): Bist du dir sicher das die Wege -alle- verschwunden sind?
rs-sepl (2015-09-04 06:49:00+00:00): Ja, da wird zZ die 76. Grundschule neugebaut. Das Ganze Gebiet ist abgesperrt und eh mit neuen Bagger und Kipperfahrwegen durchzogen.
Weirterhin hatte da jemand bisl Mist gemappt, also Wege quer durch die Landschaft gezogen.
Gruß
rs-sepl (2015-09-04 06:50:00+00:00): Wer will kann da also ne Baustelle einzeichnen. :)
Thomas8122 (2015-09-04 07:16:01+00:00): alles klar, wollt nur sicher gehen, dass da kein Unfall passiert ist
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
edvac (2021-08-04 11:30:47+00:00): Dear madmap77:

You had added a path following the MGWR trackbed, that trespasses private land. The owner has complained about it.

Do you have any evidence that the path was of public access?

Greetings,

Rafael Avila Coya
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
tosky (2015-09-03 15:50:30+00:00): Se sono edifici, meglio usare i tag appropriati :)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:building
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
pyram (2015-11-22 11:12:45+00:00): Ich habe den Adenauerring wieder so benannt, wie er offiziell und ohne Legasthenie heißt.
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
Hjart (2015-09-22 09:54:00+00:00): Der er dobbelte adressepunkter i Gislev på Sydfyn. Måske det kunne være en ide at revertere dette rettesæt og så lave en ordentlig opdatering af de eksisterende adressepunkter
mavl (2015-09-03 17:46:14+00:00): Здравстуйте.
Можно узнать почему удалён тег addr:district с точки http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1028723750/history?
mavl (2015-09-03 18:32:58+00:00): Посмотрел сейчас актуальную версию закона Тюменской области от 5 ноября 2004 г. № 263 "Об установлении границ муниципальных образований Тюменской области и наделении их статусом муниципального района, городского округа и сельского поселения" (от 11 июня 2015 г.). В ней есть Сладковский район.
Nakaner-repair (2018-11-01 09:09:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64071062 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 33777390 (housenumber node was accidentially moved)
maraf24 (2015-09-03 21:15:24+00:00): Proszę sobie w edytorze kliknąć na Tło i włączyć zdjecia z Geoportalu. Te z Binga są przesunięte o jakiś metr.
martinum4 (2015-12-17 01:47:34+00:00): Hey,
Ich betreibe grade ein bisschen Qualitätssicherung, bei Weg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368966543 bezieht sich der key "service" eigentlich auf den Zweck der Straße (Parkplatzweg, Drive-in, o.ä.), den bisherigen Wert bitte als description, note oder ähnliches einpflegen, Danke.
jfire (2016-01-12 05:13:29+00:00): Hi, it looks like you created a new relation. But there was already a relation for Colville National Forest: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5449320. Is this changeset a mistake?
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
Nakaner (2016-08-18 20:15:27+00:00): Hallo Sir Lancelot,

vielen Dank für deine Korrektur auf Basis einer Erhebung vor Ort. Steht auf dem blauen Bahnhofsschild (bzw. wenn es ein älteres ist dem weißen mit hellblauem Rand bzw. noch älter dem weißen ohne Rand) auch "(Gleis 1)"?

Ich würde das sonst auf name=Martinstein, official_name=Martinstein West ändern, wenn ich den offiziellen Namen so im Betriebsstellenverzeichnis der DB (Open-Data) finde.

Viele Grüße

Michael
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
woodpeck_repair (2015-09-11 15:40:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 33960782 where the changeset comment is: revert ficitional edits and other damage, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/804 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/805
rickmastfan67 (2015-11-03 02:36:43+00:00): I'm curious as to why you added the tags 'route=road' & 'road=US:I' to relation 1319303 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1319303) in this changeset.  Those types of relations for the "US:NHS High Priority Corridors" shouldn't be getting those tags and should be considered as a False Positive when validating in JOSM.
pkoby (2015-11-03 02:53:34+00:00): I vaguely remember doing this, and I would say it's because JOSM popped it up as a 'warning'. Would you explain to me the issue with those tags? I can't say I fully understand why they wouldn't be appropriate, but defer to your judgment. I've removed the tags, but would like to know for the future.