piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
scdhin (2021-10-15 18:22:19+00:00): Hey, I like to learn. So firstly, yes I did maybe a mistake in tagging, but before it was tagged as commercial. And I do not understand why an academic area is commercial. So I think it was wrong before, or do you have another opinion? Secondly, I saw the shape of an HQ-9 SAM site (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HQ-9) on wikimapia (Russian based platform, so no "western" view. So I had to choose between academic or military. I do not know if it is university or college or just a research_facility. So why did you tag it as university? Do you have any local proof it is not military and academic? Maybe the following example of the CAS IMECH site helps in tagging better this site? Its well tagged with landuse=education, operator=government: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489691058). Thirdly, I used Google Translate to check it out, but there was no excellent information about this site. I like the story about the Qian Xuesen, which is quite famous in working between german, american and chinese science, according to wikipedia. If it is an academic part of the CAS you might have a website or wikidata link to that branch, which we could add? CAS is quite popular. Fourthly, I don't follow "western", OSM is a global project, and I try to have a cosmopolitan view neither eastern or western or southern or northern. Thanks and have fun in mapping.
渤海西岸 (2021-10-17 15:47:04+00:00): @scdhin
你在中国的网络地图上能搜到的都不是军事区
Nikolai E (2021-10-19 01:14:22+00:00): 您好，您在杨雁路以东标出的所谓“钱学森工程试验基地”明显是一处HQ-9地空导弹阵地。如果您试图观察过卫星图，您就可以看到导弹发射车和预警雷达清晰地呈现在战位上，还能看到作为营地装饰的HQ-2；弹药库、防空洞、道路、操场、办公建筑形制完全符合HQ-9（S-300）地导阵地特征。事实上此处就是空军地空导弹第2营（原隶属空军地导第4师12团）的阵地。现已对您的更改进行回滚修正。希望您在以后编辑时注意辨识卫星图特征。此致。
user_10360149 (2021-10-20 05:56:18+00:00): @scdhin
@Nikolai E
首先，之前我是根据这个用地最初的类型来的，我事先确实不知道这里是军事基地，对这次乌龙非常抱歉
具体的实际情况，已有其他人继续完善，因此这块用地的事件就告一段落吧
并且，我不觉得Nikolai E所认为的，一个没有从军经历的普通人，能够从卫星图判断出一个基地中所述内容到底是什么器材。
First of all, I came here based on the original type of the land. I really didn’t know in advance that this was a military base. I’m very sorry for this Oolong.
The specific actual situation has been improved by others, so the incident on this land will come to an end.
And, I don’t think that Nikolai E believes that an ordinary person with no military experience can judge from the satellite image what equipment the content of a base is.
user_10360149 (2021-10-20 06:08:53+00:00): Nikolai E先生，你要画军队那我拦不住，但是反正我们其他人是不会主动去给国外人标注军事目标的。
Mr. Nikolai E, if you want to draw the army, I can't stop it, but anyway, the rest of us will not take the initiative to mark military targets for foreigners.
渤海西岸 (2021-10-21 03:25:55+00:00): 这些画军队的是真不怕查水表啊，要是OSM被墙了，这些人要负主要责任。最好不要标兵营，军校、在市区的军队办公区标标就行了，兵营最好别标，标了也别详细的说出兵种和番号。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
gendy54 (2021-12-18 19:41:25+00:00): Il manquait les tags principaux. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:51:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a r as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A, E and F of  following document


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112533601
Leo Slager (2021-10-16 10:17:47+00:00): You draw a highway over the sea and around the half of the world.

Please, never, never moves the map over this long distanves.

I removed the way.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
GinaroZ (2021-10-15 21:21:16+00:00): Not sure if you are aware but the Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment with the existing data
- you should use the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer to help align Bing before editing.
Central America (2021-10-23 13:15:06+00:00): Will do
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 15:58:57+00:00): Перед добавлением объектов, пожалуйста, настраивайте смещение подложки по трекам. Для выравнивания зданий правильной формы можно использовать клавишу Q. И карта сразу будет смотреться опрятнее.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112534182
DaveF (2021-10-15 13:09:58+00:00): Hi
landuse=grass in not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume iD's validator *suggestion* is valid or correct.
DaveF (2021-10-15 13:12:45+00:00): I've flagged it as an error:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748#issuecomment-940155347
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Ars-UA (2021-10-20 15:11:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не добавляйте, пожалуйста, на общую карту несуществующие объекты (бары). Если увидели неточность, добавьте заметку и кто-нибудь из опытных пользователей исправит.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 15:53:34+00:00): тут мультиполигон совершенно не нужен. мультиполигон нужен, когда здание примыкает к чему-нибудь или состоит из частей разной этажности. перед корректировками необходимо настраивать смещение подложки. Тут куча треков Strava, по которым это можно было быстро сделать. Присоединяйтесь к сообществу в ТГ: @ruosm, чтобы научиться редактировать карту правильно.

Тут я преобразовал мультик обратно в обычный полигон и откорректировал геометрию и смещение.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112534555
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 15:56:13+00:00): layer=1 нужен только для объектов приподнятых над землёй. Часто используется для мостов, чтобы не пересекаться с реками и другими дорогами. Дом, стоящей на земле считается находящимся на layer=0, который имеют все объекты по умолчанию. Указывать его явным образом не имеет смысла.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112534555
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
vojtechzaboril (2021-11-09 15:53:36+00:00): Dobrý den, chtěl bych se zeptat na základě čeho jste změnil stav této silnice (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/730175653) z proposed na construction? Dle Bingu to určitě není.
Cestu jsem změnil na proposed.
Díky
VSA_ (2021-11-09 17:11:43+00:00): Od silnice 35 ke křížení s komunikací 29821 je odhrnutá ornice a jsou tam stavební buňky dělníků. Občas jezdím kolem. Na mapách.cz je už taky naznačena.
vojtechzaboril (2021-11-09 17:46:30+00:00): Dobrý den,
v mapách.cz se nerozlišují silnice v plánu a ve výstavbě, dále není možné brát jak zdroj jiné mapy. Ani pozemky po stavbu nejsou zatím odděleny. Pokud je dle vás silnice ve výstavbě (podle oficiálních informací nikoliv), přídávejte do zdrojů např. survey (pokud tuto informaci ověřujete v terénu). Při měnění tagů je třeba postupovat důsledně. Tedy změnit nejen highway=proposed na *=construction ale také proposed=secondary na construction=*. Hodí se i přidat popis stavu do poznámky (tag note) např note="od yyyy/mm probíhá skrývka ornice"
S pozdravem a přáním pěkného večera.
V
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-15 11:47:07+00:00): hello, please revert this edit as it does not comply with OSM none use of abreviations.
rittoch (2021-10-18 11:36:59+00:00): Hi, NunoCaldeira!
Thanks for your comment. I edited the feature based on the official site and the customer feedback. Should I remove them?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-18 11:47:29+00:00): Yes, we. Do not use abbreviations on OSM.
rittoch (2021-10-18 12:17:54+00:00): I'm awfully sorry. I've reverted my edit
user_18526234 (2023-03-02 15:36:20+00:00): Hello dieterdreist,
I seems that you have added an man_made=flowerbed:
https://www.osm.org/way/993018375
    
I recently started documenting and using landcover=flowerbed as an alternative to the controversial landuse=flowerbed. 
  
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=flowerbed
  
Would you mind it if I change this objects tag from man_made=flowerbed to landcover=flowerbed? Or even better would be if you change it to show support to landcover=flowerbed.
Please let me know what you think.
  
Best regards,
Tjuro
dieterdreist (2023-03-02 19:18:56+00:00): actually I do mind, there is already a different landcover, while it is physically a flowerbed construction, there is currently only grass in it, your proposal would lead to information loss in this case. Generally I would see flower beds as part of the countable items, hence I would prefer something like “ornamental_planting” or “cultivated_flowers” or something like this in landcover, not flowerbed because this would be ambiguous.

Anyway, thank you for reaching out,

Cheers Martin
Tjuro_Global (2023-03-03 08:08:34+00:00): A, I see what you mean now, it is just a bit of a hard problem.
So, if I understand you correctly, you can have man_made=flowerbed + landcover=grass/dirt/ect, to indicate the landcover most of the year. And then use the man_made=flowerbed that it has been seeded with flowers?
Greetings,
Tjuro
dieterdreist (2023-03-03 08:35:31+00:00): I think this particular one isn’t seeded since many years, in general I think we should distinguish between the structure (flowerbed as a countable feature) and eventually what is growing there, and we should use different values and not just different keys (to avoid confusion)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:48:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112535292
eggie (2021-10-15 11:51:22+00:00): Dag Jeroen.. Je vraagt om feedback. Lijkt me oke. access=yes op die trappen kunnen beter weg.
Dat is default.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-15 11:55:05+00:00): De noordelijke trap heb  ik even goedgelegd en gelijk maar access=yes verwijderd. Ik gebruik een recentere luchtfoto.
Quick otho HR 2021
Gr eggie
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:47:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Traces on the ground with no proof of a building, Rooflines, shadow of the building on the groudn are mostly no buildings. Often just a piece of bare ground or a yard.


This document  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112535579
eggie (2021-10-15 11:48:15+00:00): 
Dag Caspar.. Je vraagt om een review.
Gelukt zo te zien. Het is weer zoals het was.

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2021-10-15 15:42:17+00:00): Hello! Don't add GPX tracks directly to the OSM database!
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 15:40:47+00:00): Хорошо бы научиться смещения настраивать. Линия 993022619 вообще не совпадает ни с одной указанной подложкой. Озёра должны быть вырезаны из болота, а не наложены на него. Для редактирования природы необходимо изучить мультиполигоны: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%8B_%D0%BC%D1%83%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2

Также обращайтесь за помощью в сообщество в ТГ: @ruosm Чем раньше научитесь, тем меньше потом исправлять.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112536199
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 15:22:34+00:00): Всё же зачем-то убрали оргформу у оператора. Откачу тогда, раз всё равно не меняли ничего. Чейнджсет без изменений никогда не сохранится, так как сохранять нечего.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112536540
tigerskin (2021-11-16 11:40:06+00:00): если только случайно. нет опыта совсем. стараюсь ничего не испортить
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112536540
Marek-M (2024-03-13 12:23:23+00:00): Cześć, czy ta pętla ma w rzeczywistości nazwę ulicy? Zwykle nie mają, więc nie jest to typowe rozwiązanie
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187628491
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591882629
syntex (2024-03-21 11:37:28+00:00): To nie jest nazwa ulicy, ale wiele pętli w Warszawie ma tak dodaną nazwę
Marek-M (2024-03-21 11:43:06+00:00): Ale jest to chyba nieprawidłowe rozwiązanie?
syntex (2024-03-21 13:14:46+00:00): Dlaczego?
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 15:20:18+00:00): Удаление и пересоздание точек не приветствуется, так как вы уничтожаете историю объектов. Объекты следует уничтожать лишь тогда, когда они физически перестали существовать "на земле". Следовало просто передвинуть точку и отредактировать теги.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112536648
tigerskin (2021-11-16 11:39:20+00:00): понял, спасибо
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112536648
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:42:36+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112536968
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:59:16+00:00): Hello. 
A remark.
I noticed that you map in JOSM. Great ! one of the better tools to map.
I reviewed some of your mappings and noticed that you hardly square the buildings.
Don't you have the Building tool installed and in use? This tool draws direct good squared buildings. 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112537016
gendy54 (2021-12-18 19:16:13+00:00): Bonjour,

Doublon supprimé
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 15:17:07+00:00): Прежде чем вносить правки выравнивайте подложку по трекам или лучше по Strava heatmap. Когда вы правите геометрию зданий правильной формы, используйте клавишу Q для выравнивания углов.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112537067
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:41:35+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A and A on following  document
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112537110
Ser9ei (2021-10-16 15:12:20+00:00): Непонятный комментарий к правке. Зачем было менять тип дороги? Вряд ли это улица. Откачу. Сначала читаем, потом правим: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112537185
bielebog (2021-11-07 17:23:48+00:00): Could you please revert your edits based on outdated sat imagery. The motocross track is long gone and the ADAC extended onto this area. 

See changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112311072 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112311072 and others in the same period of time.
bielebog (2021-11-07 17:27:19+00:00): BTW, I'll just drive up there again now to have some some bicycle tracks to  upload to OSM in a few days so this doesn't happen again ;-)
emacberry (2021-11-09 19:51:10+00:00): ... if you really believe the previous version is "better"... go ahead... I am looking forward to see the final result - I am going to revert this change...
bielebog (2021-11-09 22:40:20+00:00): Thank you. To assure you that the motocross track is gone: https://www.flickr.com/photos/54913063@N00/51669112225
bielebog (2021-11-11 18:34:28+00:00): Updated according to last night's track and survey
sanchi (2021-10-23 09:06:21+00:00): Buenas.
El edificio está puesto como altura 0. Tiene que tener alguna altura para ser un edificio. 0 significaría que el tejado sale del suelo. Me supongo que sera de altura 1 ¿Puedes comprobar la altura?
Gracias
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-06-03 15:17:54+00:00): Hello!

You used
mtb:scale=-1
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963263883/history

Have you maybe meant
mtb:scale=1-
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
RicoElectrico (2021-10-15 11:51:47+00:00): Cześć, proszę o wyjaśnienie, bo nie do końca jest to dla mnie oczywiste: te budynki i skwery mają takie nazwy w rzeczywistości i uświadczyłbym ich dowodów w terenie? Bo ja, nie wiedząc lepiej, i nie będąc w stanie nic znaleźć, uznałbym że są fikcyjne.