piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Muhmaker (2022-09-07 09:19:53+00:00): Warum diese Eile mit dem Abriss. Die Gebäude-Brücke gibt es noch. Die Lokalzeitungen haben oft genug über Pläne berichtet die erst Monate später oder auch gar nicht umgesetzt wurden. Hier noch was zum Lesen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#On-the-ground-Prinzip
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125858386
DeFra85 (2022-09-08 13:03:45+00:00): Als ich vor ein paar Tagen vor Ort war war die Kavalleriestraße schon komplett gesperrt in dem Bereich für den Abriss der Brücke.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-09-07 10:52:21+00:00): Hi! Please do not remove sidewalk=separate when the sidewalks are drawn separately. sidewalk=both and separated sidewalks is duplicate information and will make routing engines route pedestrian on the street instead of sidewalks. I will fix them, but please make sure to check for separated sidewalks next time. Thanks and have a nice day!
Minh Nguyen (2024-04-20 19:22:32+00:00): There is no consensus yet about whether a roadway’s name=* can refer to a route number, but there is broad agreement that it is incorrect to replace a ref=* tag with name=*, especially based on TIGER. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/names-are-not-refs-vs-some-names-are-based-on-refs/109995

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150277655
Anton Valodzin (2024-04-22 15:49:03+00:00): Hi, Minh Nguyen! Thank you for your feedback and help. At that time, I didn't have that kind of knowledge in this area of edits. I took into account this information and your recommendations for the future, and also read the comments on the OCM community forum. I will be more attentive to such edits in the future.  Best regards,Anton Valodzin.
mavl (2023-05-23 16:37:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
mavl (2023-05-23 16:36:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
mavl (2023-05-23 16:36:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-11-14 13:15:12+00:00): this user deleted your edit: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128813451/
mavl (2023-05-23 16:36:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
Niiepce (2022-09-07 13:02:13+00:00): Hallo Sanderauer,
Ich würde mich freuen, wenn sie häufiger auf Nachrichten in Änderungssatzdiskussionen antworten würden besonders, wenn diese Nachrichten Fragen enthalten. Dann müsste ich sie nicht immer wieder zu den gleichen Themen kontaktieren.
Hier verwenden sie wieder den name Tag falsch und das hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125481312) angesprochene Thema taucht hier auch wieder auf.
Ich würde mich freuen, wenn die Kommunikation besser funktioniert und sie angesprochene Themen nicht immer wieder auf die gleiche Art und Weise fehlerhaft bearbeiten trotz zahlreicher Hinweise, wie beispielsweise beim Thema der Verwendung des name-Tags.
Könnten sie bitte eine Antwort unter diesem oder dem verlinkten Änderungssatz hinterlassen?
eggie (2022-09-06 13:53:22+00:00): Hi shigi..

I think this tagging was okay with bicycle=designated 

It's the German way to tag a cycleway.
What traffic_signal is at the beginning of the highway=path?

A highway=path is not a footway. 

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-09-06 13:59:43+00:00): But in case there is an G7 sign.. 
Blue (round  father with child)
 highway=footway of course
No permission to bike. 
A highway=path will route per default for bikes.
shigi (2022-09-06 14:29:35+00:00): Oops, you're right, it's still tagged as a path. The Norddijk is crossed by Duinlaan to form 2 segments with 4 endpoints in total. On 3 of the 4 endpoints there are 'father with child' traffic signs.
Thanks for spotting my tagging mistake.
eggie (2022-09-06 15:06:17+00:00): Okay...  In that case all segments 
highway=footway

and remove foot=designated (default)

and bicycle=designated has also removed as well.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-09-06 15:52:23+00:00): I removed bicycle=designated anyway from the whole path.
If the sign is G7  you may change the path into footway.
The path that crosses the Noorddijk to the Duinlaan is indeed a cycleway G11. 
Gr eggie
shigi (2022-09-06 19:03:17+00:00): Ok, I've changed it to footway. There are G7 signs at the western end and at the crossing with Duinlaan cycleway (G7 in both directions). When coming from East I didn't notice a sign only to have them both ways a bit later. I'm not a local resident, but it seems quite clear to me that bikes shouldn't use Norddijk. I hope the tags are now alright. (I did change all 6 segments and will leave it at that.) Thanks
impiaaa (2022-09-07 15:45:10+00:00): Please save your changes in one area before moving on to another, to keep the changeset area small and easy to review.
silakshm (2022-11-01 07:43:12+00:00): Hi,

We apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs, we always confine our edits to small geographical location. This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue.

Going forward, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors. Thanks again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
silakshm
maraf24 (2022-09-17 14:41:45+00:00): Pokasowałeś tutaj adresy z budynków.
troglobiont (2022-09-06 15:20:06+00:00): Hallo,
3912/05 ist die Katasternummer dieser Höhle. Du kannst das in OSM als cave:ref eingeben.
aixbrick (2022-09-06 15:47:59+00:00): Hallo,
danke. Wenn das einmal in der Vorschlagsliste ist und man nicht richtig hinschaut...
Gruß
highflyer74 (2022-09-06 15:49:14+00:00): Hello!

According to the FB site / the website it seems that this POI has just been dis-assembled. When did you see it?

All the best from Bremen!
Frans S (2022-10-03 09:25:32+00:00): Hello,
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.

Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
You changed the highway tag "highway=unclassified" into Secondary and later into tertary. (used to be used for main roads!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125860874
Minh Nguyen (2024-04-20 19:37:02+00:00): There is no consensus yet about whether a roadway’s name=* can refer to a route number, but there is broad agreement that it is incorrect to replace a ref=* tag with name=*, especially based on TIGER. See https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/names-are-not-refs-vs-some-names-are-based-on-refs/109995

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150278166
Anton Valodzin (2024-04-22 15:49:53+00:00): Hi, Minh Nguyen!  Thank you for your feedback and help. At that time, I didn't have that kind of knowledge in this area of edits. I took into account this information and your recommendations for the future, and also read the comments on the OCM community forum. I will be more attentive to such edits in the future.  Best regards, Anton Valodzin.
legofahrrad (2022-09-06 14:11:08+00:00): Sorry für die große bbox, hatte vergessen zwischendurch hochzuladen ;)
highflyer74 (2022-09-06 15:28:54+00:00): Skandal! Aber sehr formschön ;-)
mavl (2023-05-23 16:36:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
mavl (2023-05-23 16:36:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
NicoSa (2022-09-07 05:46:33+00:00): Danke dir ;-)
2tefan (2022-09-07 15:19:28+00:00): Please don't create changes with such large geographic span. See wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history#Keep_changesets_manageable
Anonym271 (2022-09-07 17:32:51+00:00): Oops, I'm very sorry for that. I was using StreetComplete and the app uploaded all of my changes in one changeset.
Luzandro (2022-09-07 10:37:04+00:00): Hi,

please pay attention to the warnings you are shown by your editor. You have moved a node and thereby the connected path across the whole settlement, crossing multiple streets and buildings

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/1679219776
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125861753
drgis (2022-09-07 10:57:15+00:00): Sorry, this was a mistake
emersonveenstra (2022-09-06 15:44:09+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your contribution to OSM! The correct way to map charging stations is to make the point a standalone node (not connected to the parking lot) by selecting it and hitting the E key, and then change it to "ChargePoint"   feature type. Would you mind doing this? Thanks!
BloodDonorMI (2022-09-06 15:46:00+00:00): Yes I will try, thanks
bxl-forever (2022-09-08 22:44:16+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM.

I see you requested a review of this changeset.  

Your edit is good.  You added the name of a company on a building, and this is fine.  Of course, only if A&C Systems is the only company using this building.

Anyone who types the name of the company will now find it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=A%2526C%20systems

If you want, you can also edit it again: under the address you can add a description of the type of business they do, or a link to their website, that might be useful.
eggie (2022-09-06 17:24:12+00:00): Martin ..  paving_stones heb ik veranderd in grass_paver
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125863038

MVG
eggie



MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-06 17:32:52+00:00): Dag Threore.. Je vraagt feedback
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125863099

Tip  Kijk goed naar hoe die andere paden zijn getagd.
met tunnel=building+passage en/of covered=yes
Tenminste als je paden onder en/of door de gebouwen lopen. Het geeft nu foutmeldingen
warnings:crossing_ways:building-highway 	6
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	1

MVG
eggie
Grass-snake (2024-09-19 18:50:08+00:00): Здравствуйте, вынужден удалить тег owner=* с улиц, вряд ли этими улицами владеет администрация. Если я ошибся и вы уверены в этом теге, напишите пожалуйста.
Anton Melnichuk (2022-09-08 07:30:52+00:00): билборди знесли?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125863318
otis19 (2022-09-16 16:29:44+00:00): В садовых сообществах оказалось не проехать
Anton Melnichuk (2022-09-19 12:38:43+00:00): Так я питаю про рекламу вздовж дороги, ви прибрали билборди, і про них питаю
otis19 (2022-10-13 09:42:57+00:00): вибачте, я зробив щось не те
Supaplex (2022-09-07 06:37:19+00:00): 為何要把跑道刪除呢？
Jeff0703 (2022-09-07 13:18:50+00:00): 原本田徑場的跑道是噴漆在草地上的，並沒有獨立的跑道
目前田徑場正在整建，等完成後再評估是否加入跑道
soshial (2023-06-29 08:21:16+00:00): Liels paldies!
MxxCon (2022-09-07 05:19:00+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate where all these names are coming from?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125864304
MxxCon (2022-09-07 05:19:02+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate where all these names are coming from?
LockOnGuy (2022-09-06 16:36:52+00:00): Hello, please use a changeset comment, also, please answer my question in  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125808485
Business intelligence agency (2022-09-07 11:39:00+00:00): Instagram page : https://www.instagram.com/business.intelligence.agency/
amritkarma (2025-05-29 09:39:44+00:00): Hi while adding, please make sure not to delete other objects. Whole park has been deleted here.
pesec (2022-09-07 04:18:00+00:00): Добрый день.
Вы внесли ложные данные.
Будьте внимательны при редактировании, изучите правила внесения правок.
Этот пакет правок был отменен.
pesec (2022-09-07 04:17:43+00:00): Добрый день.
Вы внесли ложные данные.
Будьте внимательны при редактировании, изучите правила внесения правок.
Этот пакет правок был отменен.
ohmanger (2022-09-06 16:13:29+00:00): Source survey/aerial imagery
Allison P (2025-04-29 07:40:05+00:00): "denomination=cult"?https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14550904
rskedgell (2022-09-06 16:32:14+00:00): Thanks!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-09-14 14:38:39+00:00): Good job, Aulo's edits are something.
Niiepce (2022-09-07 10:51:02+00:00): Bitte verwende statt tree_species die Tags species, species:de oder species:en
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:species
trigpoint (2022-09-06 16:50:11+00:00): This seems an odd change, unclassified is probably the correct tag as this road is quite narrow. 

Wondering why you changed it as it has been unclassified since it was first mapped 11 years ago.

Cheers Phil
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
som-tam (2023-04-13 10:36:45+00:00): Was ist das? Ist "Maßanzüge" gemeint? Wie heißt der Laden?
Hypoknosimus (2023-04-13 11:03:34+00:00): Es handelt sich um eine Werbeagentur/Film-&Fotostudio namens "Marsanzüge"
som-tam (2023-04-13 13:20:45+00:00): Danke für die Aufklärung.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
dónal (2023-01-21 15:18:01+00:00): Reverted by changeset 131544493. No evidence of a park or wood.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125867080
LockOnGuy (2022-09-06 17:04:42+00:00): Hello, can you explain what is this?        
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1092410561 and why did you add it?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Benoît C MdP (2022-09-07 07:15:30+00:00): Bonjour 871694e9-20e8-4037-b035-e4c8607650cf

Attention, tu as doublonné le couloir bus pour le boulevard Saint-Germain. Il existait déjà sous la forme d'une voie séparée.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
pitfire (2022-09-07 05:09:58+00:00): Hallo sasan-maker,
access no bedeutet: Kein Zugang für die breite Öffentlichkeit (Benutzung nicht erlaubt.), Das ist hier nicht gegeben.
Ein barrier bollard Impliziert
    access=no
    foot=yes
    bicycle=yes
pitfire (2022-09-07 05:42:49+00:00): Hallo sasan-maker, 
sorry, natürlich erst einmal willkommen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erfasse_keine_Vorschriften.2C_die_nicht_durch_Gegenst.C3.A4nde_vor_Ort_repr.C3.A4sentiert_werden
LockOnGuy (2022-09-06 17:11:08+00:00): Take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4074578 , the name:fa you added is wrong.
MUHAMMED`sab (2022-09-06 17:57:29+00:00): Hello, thanks, it has been corrected
jeslop (2022-09-06 18:13:38+00:00): Hola David. Te has confundido al utilizar la etiqueta place=village aquí. Fíjate bien en la definición de la wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place=village?uselang=es

La inmensa mayoría de lo que has dibujado no tiene uso residencial ni se corresponde con un pueblo, villa o ciudad...

Cambiálo lo antes que puedas.

Saludos.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
David Ll L (2022-09-06 20:44:24+00:00): Buenas. Acabo de hacer un cambio. Desconocía esa opción, espero que así esté bien hecho.
jeslop (2022-09-06 21:06:59+00:00): Disculpa no había visto este mensaje. Te contesto en el otro conjunto de cambios. Gracias por contestar.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
ScantLeopard336 (2022-09-07 00:53:09+00:00): Hey there,

Are you sure these are Livingston addresses? I know the cities in addresses can be weird sometimes, but the apartment community is even called Avalon Roseland.
clay_c@wonder (2022-09-07 13:51:32+00:00): Good catch. I tried a sampling of these addresses in the USPS ZIP Code lookup tool and they all seem to belong to 07068/Roseland. The Census Bureau puts this area in the ZIP Code tabulation area for 07039/Livingston, causing some of our data sources to incorrectly report that as the actual ZIP Code.

Updated here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125903491
gis_shafter (2022-09-06 17:17:24+00:00): *Edit - 18 houses, 2 residential buildings, 1 detached house, and 1 address point.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-06 17:28:14+00:00): Hello, you said "Deleting the incorrect segment" which I assume for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4335767 that you deleted in this changeset. But the road is cleanly visible in all sat images, you can see there is cars parked too, why did you delete it? and how is it incorrect segment?  Thanks.
Saeed SJ (2022-09-07 06:26:39+00:00): Hello
Yes, it is true that there are a few parked cars, but in the aerial image, there are clearly walls and buildings on both sides, and this is probably a private path and not a way for the public to pass. (At this point, Bing aerial imagery is more clear)
 However, if your opinion is against this, I will draw again.
In addition, two ways 4335766 and 4335760 were connected in the map, which I separated because of the building and the wall.
Thanks
LockOnGuy (2022-09-07 06:32:31+00:00): If a road look private don’t delete it, instead tag it as a private.        
If you see cars parked on a road, that mean the road is accessible and should not be deleted.        
If I were in your shoes I wouldn’t spilt ways, but add a barrier tag where the concrete barrier wall is at the road.     
Thanks.
Saeed SJ (2022-09-07 07:22:34+00:00): okay. I will correct this section and consider this suggestion in the next edits.
Thanks for your attention.
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-07 05:46:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Jeno87 (2022-09-07 13:35:10+00:00): Hi!

Thank you. 

Of course, my bad. Will do so going forward.

I look at Google Street View pictures to determine the size of the premises.
pitfire (2022-09-07 05:25:37+00:00): Hallo sasan-maker,
Betr: 2177305465, v3
barrier = gate
access no bedeutet: Kein Zugang für die breite Öffentlichkeit (Benutzung nicht erlaubt.),
Hast Du bestimmt vor Ort überprüft, was genau hier ausgeschildert ist?
Sinnvolle Kombinationen ist:
    access=private
    foot=yes
    bicycle=yes
    maxwidth=*
    locked=*
sasan-maker (2022-09-07 06:57:31+00:00): Das Tor an der Bonner Strasse ist privat. Dahinter befindet sich ein Privatgrundstück. In diesem Bereich wurde der Weg verlegt. Der Weg war und ist für die Öffentlichkeit begehbar. Ich hoffe, dass ich das in der Map richtig eingetragen habe.
pitfire (2022-09-07 09:08:46+00:00): Wenn dem so ist, wie Du es beschreibst, braucht der Abschnitt über das Grundstück noch ein "access=private oder permissive".
Gibt es das VZ "traffic_sign=DE:239", oder ist die Nutzung nur geduldet?
Die Handhabung findest Du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=footway?uselang=de
sasan-maker (2022-09-08 16:44:33+00:00): Den Fussweg zwischen Mühlenweg und Zur Mühle habe ich so angepasst, dass er nicht mehr über das Privatgrundstück führt. Wegen des geschlossenen Tors sowie eines neuen Zauns ist der Fussweg gar nicht mehr anders nutzbar als jetzt eingezeichnet.
Wetterhorn (2022-09-06 20:56:33+00:00): Hi MrKooken, plotseling weer heel actief, goed bezig! Maar wat is de reden dat de retail area heb verwijderd rondom Winkelcentrum Lage Bothof?
Mashin (2022-09-07 22:20:27+00:00): Thanks for contributing! Do you know what kind of business this is (restaurant, fast food,..)? Name is not sufficient to find it.
Frans S (2022-09-14 09:15:01+00:00): Hello.
A remark.
This is a building and residential area mapping project.
Please don't waste time on mapping roads. (The highways you've mapped are mostly just tracks in the fields. No need to map them at all.)
Best regards
bradrh (2023-01-29 21:34:52+00:00): This road #686208509, labeled FR 315.2 is shown as 315.1 on USGS topo, and is not on the MVUM?  Were you there and verified that it is open?  There is another road, just west of this one, which is labeled 315.2 on the mvum, and is open to MV
pmckay419 (2023-01-29 21:51:16+00:00): Are you asking about the spur road to the top of Sheep Mountain, FR 315.2 on the MVUM? The MVUM shows the wrong location for that road. I drove it and GPSed it myself in September and it's about a quarter mile east of where the MVUM and FS GIS data shows it. There is no road where the MVUM shows it. My mapping in OSM shows the correct location.
bradrh (2023-01-29 22:19:14+00:00): Yes, thx.   Every usfs map & usgs topo shows it in the wrong place.   I'll tag it as abandoned & add a note about the official maps being wrong so someone else doesn't look at the and mess up the correct one.   I though I saw something on imagery,  but maybe not.
I was wrong about it showing as 315.1 on the topo,  I was misreading a label for another road.
pmckay419 (2023-01-29 22:35:19+00:00): Just to clarify, 315.2 is open, just shown in the wrong place on government maps. Just making sure you're not tagging that one as abandoned.
pmckay419 (2023-01-29 22:42:41+00:00): I just added a note to the way.
bradrh (2023-01-29 23:16:05+00:00): Yes, correct. Didn't touch that one. Added this one with a note.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1136310598
pmckay419 (2023-01-29 23:47:32+00:00): Ah ok, gotcha.
Kovoschiz (2022-09-30 09:55:50+00:00): Is this ever used? Please don't make up your own names by transliteration.
wireguy (2022-10-18 17:11:34+00:00): Doctor, can you revisit the changeset and area?  Seems that several boundary relations are now not closed, including: Vienna Center, Fowler Township, Vienna Township, Mecca Township, Johnston Township, Mecca, Hartford Township and Bazetta Township.
relation 183465
relation 14365571
relation 14365756
relation 14365558
relation 14365572
relation 14365757
relation 14368174
DrDisaster (2022-10-19 20:37:49+00:00): I'll be honest... I have NO idea what I am doing with respect to township boundaries.
Minh Nguyen (2022-10-19 23:42:39+00:00): Here’s some documentation on mapping townships in Ohio: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ohio/Boundaries/Townships
woodpeck (2022-09-07 10:59:58+00:00): Hallo, in diesem Changset hast Du die Arztpraxis Müller/Erkens-Fabers mit einer Personaldienstleistungsfirma überschrieben. Gibt es die Arztpraxis wirklich nicht mehr, oder war das ein Versehen?
pitfire (2022-09-07 12:12:24+00:00): Hallo, 
der Knoten: ADITUS hat keinen regulären Phone Eintrag  nach international (ITU-T E.164) format.
Ar999 (2022-09-07 18:24:05+00:00): Hallo,

es ist wirklich so, dass es dort keine Arztpraxis mehr gibt. Zwischendurch war sogar ein Steuerberater in den Räumlichkeiten.
Nun aber die Firma Aditus.

Die Telefonnummer habe ich ebefalls im entsprechenden Format angepasst.
woodpeck (2022-09-07 18:56:26+00:00): Alles klar, danke für Deine Antwort!
silversurfer83 (2022-09-08 07:42:04+00:00): Eine Bitte noch, unabhängig vom verwendeten Editor:
Bitte diese Seite beachten https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

(und vielleicht noch diese https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)

Danke :)
Sree1922 (2022-09-06 18:25:29+00:00): Imagery used Maxar Premium Imagery
HKHikerhang (2022-09-07 10:26:07+00:00): Any proof of this name?
Minh Nguyen (2023-10-18 04:43:01+00:00): Thought you might be interested to know that one map style was rendering these emoji, though ideally it would render something more faithful to the logos:

https://github.com/ZeLonewolf/openstreetmap-americana/issues/451#issuecomment-1169406462
HKHikerhang (2022-09-07 10:23:44+00:00): Any proof of this name?
HKHikerhang (2022-09-07 10:23:16+00:00): Any proof of this name?