piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToniE (2022-08-29 08:58:38+00:00): Hi,

you've left again many bus route in a very bad state.

I started fixing them for 602 and 603 (I guess) but am not willing to clean up all the stuff.

Kindly see the PTNA results https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-MVV-Analysis.html#bus_601 and following.

BR
Toni
ToniE (2022-08-29 09:02:46+00:00): I suggest you change to the JOSM editor or stop destroying bus relations. JOSM is the best editor for handling (bus) relations.

Also don't use the the "sort" function of iD and JOSM for complex bus routes - they destroy more than actually fix.

BR
Toni
zorae (2022-08-29 10:08:01+00:00): Thanks for letting me know! I will attempt to revert the problematic changes asap. I did check that iD had put the new ways in the correct position within a relation and that all the surrounding members were still in order, but apparently it caused some other issues I didn’t catch. FYI, I’ve had similar issues with JOSM, where adding members to a relation caused unrelated members of the relation to re-arrange unexpectedly.
ToniE (2022-08-29 10:24:27+00:00): Yeah, bus route relations are hard to maintain if they include loops. 

Automatic sorting by iD and JOSM use to fail then, creating isolated loops and so on.

Also splitting at traffic islands usually requites 50% of the routes to be adapted: delete the old (now oneway) part, add the new one.

Manual sorting is also hard, 'cause you need to know the sequence of stops and ways.
zorae (2022-08-30 16:38:32+00:00): I've gone through and fixed all the relations. Let me know if you still encounter any issues.
zstadler (2022-09-26 10:53:31+00:00): Hello Liron,

Thank you for your contributions to OSM and Israel Hiking maps!

In this edit you have changed the colour of a section of the red trail to black. 
On both sides of the new black segment there are still red segments.

Can you elaborate on what happened there?
Was the red trail cancelled?
Is there an overlap between an old red trail and a new black trail?

As far as I can tell, this segment is not part of the black
סינגל גבעת המורה
from KKL:
https://www.kkl.org.il/bike/trips/2131/

Thanks and Happy New Year!
Zeev
Liron Lev (2022-09-26 18:25:01+00:00): Hi Zeev,
This part is not part of the Giv'vat HaMoreh single.
I've changed the color since on the trail it self, the color was changed.
On that part, that I ran at, the black color was on top of the red one.

Hope my answer clarified your question.

Shana Tova, 
Liron
zstadler (2022-09-28 14:42:36+00:00): Apparently, this change was done by the "vaada". See the bottom of
https://www.teva.org.il/idcunim/idcunim-3

Thanks for the update!

As a result, I've completed the change up-to the peak, and added a new relation for the new trail
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14634462#map=15/32.6179/35.3629

Shana Tova,
Zeev
deepblue66 (2022-12-04 22:44:54+00:00): Ist das wirklich ein roundabout (Kreisverkehr) nach https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stvo_2013/__8.html mit den Zeichen 215 und 205?
Josef73 (2022-12-05 11:41:22+00:00): Ich werde meine Änderunge rückgängig machen. Bitte noch klären wer von circular auf roundabout geändert hat.
Josef73 (2022-12-05 20:45:21+00:00): der revert ist erledigt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129756514#map=19/52.43616/9.69924
user_2066394 (2022-08-28 09:36:56+00:00): Die Hausnummern 226 und 228 sind hier bereits erfasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1529122605
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1529123103

Die 226 ergibt jetzt ein Duplikat.
user_2066394 (2022-08-30 23:12:38+00:00): nachbereitet
SekeRob (2022-08-28 10:14:58+00:00): Hi,

You should NOT add arbitrary names to general public roads and tracks, use the official.

I see you already created a Lungofiume Foro route relation, where each section needs to get the proper track rating (grades 1-5) and mtb scales etc.

You can create as many route relations as you like on the same ways, tag them as local or per the official national/regional network coding. If Percorso Lungofiume Foro is different to this relation you made/edited.

At any rate, the asphalt road you marked with name "Percorso..." is Contrada San Vincence and has the road ref of ex SS263.

cheers

PS Respect ways that are signed with 'strada/proprieta privata. Don't include them in any routing and if you see the access=private tag missing on a way where signed, please add them.

traduzione:

NON dovresti aggiungere nomi arbitrari a strade e piste pubbliche in generale, usa l'ufficiale.

Vedo che hai già creato una relazione di percorso Lungofiume Foro, dove ogni sezione deve ottenere la corretta valutazione del tracciato (gradi 1-5) e scale mtb ecc.

Puoi creare tutte le relazioni di percorso che desideri negli stessi modi, contrassegnarle come locali o secondo la codifica della rete nazionale/regionale ufficiale. Se Percorso Lungofiume Foro è diverso da questa relazione che hai realizzato/modificato.

Ad ogni modo, la strada asfaltata che hai segnato con il nome "Percorso..." è Contrada San Vincence e ha il rif. ex SS263.

Saluti

PS Rispettare le vie che si firmano con 'strada/proprieta privata. Non includerli in nessun percorso e se vedi il tag access=private mancante in un percorso, aggiungili.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
bxl-forever (2022-08-31 15:32:23+00:00): Hello,

I don’t think it is correct to use addr:housename here.

addr:housename means "This POI has no ordinary address (street+nbr) but is found in the building with that name", and the value must match an existing name for a building.

If Toison d’Or is the name of this building, then simply use "name" for it.

("building:name" can also be used for buildings with many other tags, to avoid confusion about what the name refers to; on this building I think that "name" will be enough.)

Hope this helps.
Pol Dellaiera (2022-08-31 15:49:39+00:00): Ok thanks for the clarification, I will do the changes here and in other places in Nivelles.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:04:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 07:10:41+00:00): Fuerteventura is mainly made up of sand and volcanic rock this has been updated accordingly / Fuerteventura se compone principalmente de arena y roca volcánica, esto se ha actualizado en consecuencia
paunofu (2022-08-28 09:23:30+00:00): Buenas tardes, que Fuerteventura se componga principalmente de arena y roca volcánica, no hace que sea natural=sand y el place=archipelago no se debe de suprimir puesto que es un archipiélago y así lo recoge la wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Darchipelago
jeslop (2022-08-28 11:00:17+00:00): Te he revertido este cambio por las razones que te explica el compañero, la composición de la isla no elimina que forme parte de un archipiélago ni la convierte en natural=sand porque no es exclusivamente arena. De nuevo te pido un poco más de atención en el mapeado.

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125465187
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 17:23:58+00:00): the islands are made of sand and volcanic rock, the reversal of the set of changes is false
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 17:24:11+00:00): las islas están hechas de arena y roca volcánica, la inversión del conjunto de cambios es falsa
SomeoneElse (2022-08-28 22:10:14+00:00): > the reversal of the set of changes is false

Jesús López was correct to revert this.  I can guarantee that I've been to bits of the Canary Islands that _weren't_ sand.
I'm sure that everyone involved in OpenStreetMap would encourage you to become a little more familiar with how to map things where people are suggesting you aren't getting it right (as mentioned at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=16957800 ).  If in doubt, please ask - https://community.openstreetmap.org/ would be an excellent place to start.
Best Regards,
Andy
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 22:56:00+00:00): La inversión del conjunto de cambios es falsa El 99% es arena y roca volcánica solo estamos actualizando el mapa con datos precisos corrigiendo el conjunto de cambios de las islas andy
SomeoneElse (2022-08-28 23:07:23+00:00): Please learn how things are mapped in OSM before making statements like that.
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 23:33:44+00:00): "AlguienElse" sabemos cómo ingresar datos de mapas la información ingresada datos precisos que se pueden obtener de la fotografía satelital de la tierra sugerimos hacer referencias cruzadas a este agradecimiento
SomeoneElse (2022-08-28 23:43:40+00:00): No, I'm afraid you really don't yet.
Patr1k_P (2022-08-31 09:03:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089803583

pedestrian sa pouziva u nakupnych centier a namesti...bezne chodniky ak su asfaltove a v dobrej kvalite tak pouzit footway a v horsej kvalite pouzit path
eggie (2022-08-28 08:08:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ruboqif (2022-08-28 08:10:18+00:00): Bonjour,
La ligne 230 n'existe plus depuis le 1er janvier. Elle a été reprise par Keolis dans le réseau aix-en-bus avec le numéro 26. 
Il faudrait donc modifier toutes les infos et le circuit également car le terminus se fait au complexe sportif d'Eguilles.
Pa413 (2022-08-28 08:54:21+00:00): Bonjour et oui je comprenais pas pourquoi.
Pourtant elle figure encore ligne 230 sur le réseau La Métropole Mobilité le Car.
Je ferais les changements. 
Merci pour l’info.
Bonne journée
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 07:58:37+00:00): El aeropuerto no existe cuando miras las imágenes satelitales globales de Bing
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 07:59:14+00:00): Aeropuerto Eliminado
paunofu (2022-08-28 09:25:53+00:00): No sale en bing pero si en Maxar y Esri, entonces si existe. Se revertirá este changeset.
paunofu (2022-08-28 09:29:47+00:00):  changeset de reversión 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125469161
jeslop (2022-08-28 10:55:05+00:00): Saludos. No puedes eliminar un aeropuerto porque no sale en las imágenes que tu usas, primero debes contrastar tus fuentes con otras, como bien te comenta el compañero.

Ten cuidado con las ediciones, estando causando problemas en varios puntos, pon mayor atención o pueden ser consideradas vandalismo. Al ser tus primeras ediciones tienes una guía para principainates aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 17:16:29+00:00): Satellite images of the earth confirm this, as well as ATXLDN team members living on the island can confirm that the islands are made of sand and volcanic, therefore this set of changes is valid.
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 17:16:32+00:00): changeset de reversión is false since the changeset is actuate to satellite photography
Location Capture By DUH (2022-08-28 17:20:18+00:00): esto no se considera vandalismo, el aeropuerto no existe en la vida real, se refiere a las imágenes satelitales de la tierra. [ Captura de ubicación por atxldn Spanish Data Team ]
paunofu (2022-08-30 07:31:36+00:00): Pero que imágenes satelitales? Las de Bing? Maxar y Esri si muestran el aeropuerto.
jeslop (2022-08-30 09:05:09+00:00): Hola paunofu. Estaban utilizando imágenes de Bing, más antiguas. Hemos hablado desde el DWG con el usuario y se ha comprometido a ir resolviendo los problemas creados por este desfase en las imágenes.

Saludos

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
InfosReseaux (2023-01-05 00:06:10+00:00): Bonsoir !

Je remarque l'ajout de la section souterraine du ruisseau du marais ici et déversement dans le lac.
Quelle est la source de cette section souterraine ?
Pour moi la BD Topage est fausse. Le déversoir visible sur les vues aériennes correspond uniquement à la galerie EDF qui débouche à cet endroit.
M'étant déplacé là-bas, je n'ai pas vu d'autre débouché à la surface. Cette canalisation irait-elle plutôt dans la galerie EDF en souterrain ?

Bonne soirée
JFK73 (2023-01-05 12:52:42+00:00): Bonjour

C'est bien vu, il est rare que j'extrapole autant que je ne l'ai fait ici.

BD Topo hydrographie indique une galerie que j'ai choisi de garder. Toutefois la position des galeries est souvent fausse dans cette BD.
Elle indique aussi un deuxième écoulement vers le Nord.
Enfin Carthage indique juste une "perte" au départ de la galerie.

De toute façon si vous êtes allé sur place et qu'il n'y a pas de déversoir vers le lac, soit :
- il y a effectivement une perte mais j'en doute un peu.
- il y a une galerie souterraine qui se déverse dans la "grande" galerie
- l'estompage RGE Alti pourrait confirmer l'écoulement du ruisseau vers le Nord parallèlement au Chemin du Marais le long de la lisière de forêt juste à côté d'un sentier qu'il faudrait emprunter pour en avoir le cœur net ....

En attendant je propose de relier les deux galeries avant le déversoir comme vous l'avez suggéré pour coller au terrain et éventuellement mettre une balise FIXME résumant le cas.
Si vous préférez supprimer pas de souci non plus.
Ce coin n'est pas évident.

Bonne cartographie
InfosReseaux (2023-01-08 17:35:56+00:00): Bonjour

Il n'y a pas de mal, Carthage/Topage ont leur lot d'imprécisions en effet et c'est bien dommage.
Je doute aussi de la perte, il doit être canalisé.

Sans avoir de certitude, je pense qu'il faudrait supprimer l’exutoire du ruisseau pour l'instant.
Il peut aussi bien déverser dans la galerie EDF ou bien dans le réseau d'eau pluviale sous voirie de la départementale à proximité.

Il vaut mieux supprimer la section et indiquer un fixme pour inciter à la rechercher.
Puis-je vous le laisser faire s'il vous plaît ?

Bonne soirée 

Bonne soirée
Warin61 (2022-12-21 09:50:52+00:00): Hi,
What is the source of the 'locality' node 9982966777 (De Grey Station) ??? 

Note 'Stations' are usually farms of some description - so they do have people there. 'Localities' in OSM terms have no people..
AndrewS (2022-12-21 20:21:39+00:00): changed to farm. thanks.
Warin61 (2022-12-22 07:16:20+00:00): Thanks for this change to 'farm'. but what is the information source of the 'De Grey Station'???
AndrewS (2023-01-08 03:33:21+00:00): I honestly don't recall. I was marking the De Grey river and disused mines in the vicinity so maybe the station was on a mine map I was using. There were also plenty of pre-existing De Grey  clues in the vicinity, so probably just that.
Warin61 (2023-01-08 09:11:48+00:00): Pitty. If there was a source we could use ther are a great many homesteads that could be mapped.
Protoxenus (2023-10-24 08:36:14+00:00): Was soll denn das für ein Art "artwork" sein? Könntest du das näher spezifizieren?
Gruß Protoxenus
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
silversurfer83 (2022-08-28 20:15:27+00:00): Gude Einrotsch,

eine Bitte: Wenn Du Änderungen in zwei so weit voneinander entfernten Gegenden der Republik hast, dann mach das doch bitte in zwei eigenen Änderungssätzen, damit nicht die QS-Tools für Nutzer quer durch DE darauf anspringen. Danke.
Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125467229
user_2066394 (2022-08-28 18:14:06+00:00): Wurde der umgepflügt?
abakus_uploader (2022-08-28 22:32:43+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-08-28 22:32:49+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2022-08-28 09:59:46+00:00): Dag Wolf Je vraagt feedback.. Klopt.. geen water daar.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-28 10:27:11+00:00): Er is op meer plaatsen water gemapt door mapper Robbie.  Ik heb wat verwijderd.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-08-28 10:28:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125471271
xephos1one (2022-09-24 18:14:50+00:00): Bitte achte darauf, deine Bearbeitungen je Changeset lokal zu begrenzen, vielen Dank :)
user_2066394 (2022-08-28 09:13:13+00:00): Ist mit
caravans=no
bereits erfasst (caravans vs. caravan)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site
HiddeWie (2022-08-28 09:25:44+00:00): Thanks, I didnt notice the duplicate key. I reverted my changeset.
SekeRob (2022-08-29 08:56:17+00:00): Hi,

If you did so, you may have dragged path nodes causing a self intersection on the bare rock. This caused it to disappear from rendering. Duly corrected.

cheers
billybug (2022-08-29 10:58:09+00:00): Merci pour l'ajout des trottoirs ;-)
eddynamite (2022-08-29 12:30:49+00:00): Mais de rien ;)
dentonny (2022-09-16 08:56:30+00:00): Dag Sus,

Controleer jij niet eerst of de huizen die je toevoegt al niet op osm staan?
Nu staan de huizen in de Yvonne Verbruggenstraat er dubbel in want ik had deze al toevoegd.
susvhv (2022-09-16 16:54:13+00:00): Dag Tonny,

Ik controller dat wel, maar daar is een verklating voor dit toeval. 
Un invoer dateert van 27/8/22  om 22u17 , mijn invoer om  28/8/22 rond 11 uur. Het is best mogelijk dat ik nog met gegevens OSM zat die ik dag voordien ingeladen had. en zag ik uw bijdrage niet.
Wat ook mogelijk is, is dat men bij OSM de gegevens nog niet verwekt had
susvhv (2022-09-16 17:05:55+00:00): (sorry voor de onderbreking.
Ik heb al opgemerkt dat gegevens die men invoerd pas na een tijdje op de OSM kaart verschijnen.
Ik zie ook dat in uw invoer inkepingen zitten in de huizen, daar waar de daken rechthoekig zijn. 
Maar dat is de eeuwige discussie tussen grondplan en dakplan. Maar destijds kadden we enkel luchtfoto's.
Meestal als er twee mappers op deze plaats mappen crast JOSM, dat had beter geweest want dat had ik niets ingevoerd.

Groetjes
eggie (2022-08-28 09:53:49+00:00): Dag Els.. het museum staat al op de kaart.. Dus 2x is 1x te veel. Ik zal je bijdrage weer verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
Carto'Cité (2023-01-12 16:41:31+00:00): Salut Furdrien,
Sur cette route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40745129) il n'y a a priori pas de signalétique qui confirme le DSC. J'ai corrigé pour la mettre en zone 30 d'ailleurs. Je supprime le DSC mais dis-moi si tu as des observations.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
eggie (2022-08-28 12:12:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2022-08-29 10:45:37+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.osm.org/way/1089822355. What is the meaning of the tag bygningsty = Bygning?
osmviborg (2022-08-29 15:13:54+00:00): Deleted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Waaslander (2022-08-28 10:43:59+00:00): Er hoeven geen misdiensten plaats te vinden opdat dit label mag worden toegevoegd. Het mag ook gezien worden als een plaats waar dat je kan bidden.
user_3022894 (2023-04-27 13:49:23+00:00): Hi,

laut TIM-online lautet die Adresse "Haus Martfeld", nicht "Im Martfeld".

Hat ein User gerade (zurück-)geändert, ich wollte dich nur eben informieren.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Niederpruem (2023-04-27 16:19:34+00:00): Schaue Dir mal die Homepage vom Restaurant Haus Martfeld an.
Dort steht unter Kontakt die Adresse Im Martfeld 1
https://hausmartfeld.de/kontakt/
Aber Haus Martfeld ist auch ganz gut.
user_3022894 (2023-05-02 18:00:03+00:00): Ich verstehe. Auf jeden Fall Danke erst mal für den Hinweis.

Das könnte man vielleicht in einer note=* oder description=* an das OSM-Objekt "Haus Martfeld" schreiben.

Eig. ein bisschen komisch, dass die ihren eigenen Straßennamen nicht richtig kennen... Na ja.
mtmail (2022-08-29 19:01:04+00:00): Hello Claudio,

Please do use meaningful changeset comments - “m” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.
Mordechai23 (2022-08-29 14:20:27+00:00): nr in lower case letters means "number" in polish, maybe it was that?
Alexey Vazhnov (2022-08-29 15:15:16+00:00): I think it was 633 in past, then somebody put a label "4" in the middle. But the label is partially transparent, and I can see "3" in a background.
Mordechai23 (2022-09-07 07:45:30+00:00): https://www.urbancard.pl/punktysprzedazy

Its ref=643 now.
Also NR is not a part of the ref, it just indecates that its a number

I stumbled upon this website searching for a completely unrelated thing, but Im sure it could be of use for you ;)
Alexey Vazhnov (2022-09-09 19:31:25+00:00): Mordechai23, thank you! I will use the website for corrections.
gscholz (2022-09-03 06:04:33+00:00): Hi Ale_Zena_IT,
this changeset has created errors in the OSm database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=17.80876&lat=40.55864&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125471440

The rrror is cause by way 1089830579 (steps):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089830579#map=19/40.55884/17.80862

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Ale_Zena_IT (2022-09-04 09:41:50+00:00): Hello, I see it was already fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125752140

Thank you,
  Alessandro
literan (2022-08-28 20:28:43+00:00): это не названия, а текст вывесок. Откачу.
Frans S (2022-08-28 10:57:43+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Each building need to be mapped separately, 
Square each building with the Q key !



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125472087