piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Martin Borsje (2017-10-24 12:59:51+00:00): Een losliggend voetpad wordt als highway=footway (of path) getekend. En dan niet tevens footway=sidewalk.

Sidewalk tag je aan de highway (zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk) als er sprake is van een trottoir: d.w.z. door middel van een stoeprand gescheiden maar direct aan de hoofdweg liggend voetgangersgedeelte.

de combinateie hw=footway EN footway=sidewalk is incorrect.
Allroads (2017-10-24 14:30:27+00:00): ik heb het ingevoegd als probleemstelling in het volgende topic.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=669441#p669441
majid1359 (2017-10-23 19:58:34+00:00): لطفا تیپاکس شعبه انزلی و کلوچه ملوان و محدوده نظامی و ایستگاه قایق سواری بلوار   به نقشه اضافه گردد
Allroads (2017-10-24 12:50:03+00:00): Hier wordt foot=use_sidepath verwijdert. Waarom? Het is een aanvulling voor routering. De ernaast gelegen weg footway, was zo aangesloten dat het door routeerde.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460782893 en andere
Er ligt een pad naast voor voetgangers.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53189835
cycleway:right=lane
bicycle=use_sidepath daar is gedeeltelijk fout, moet zijn bicycle:backward=use_sidepath, want het is aan 1 zijde een lane.
footway is aan 1 kant niet aangesloten.

Al met al geen verbetering. Op een serviceweg na.
carciofo (2017-11-23 14:23:55+00:00): Hi, this changeset among many others from your colleagues at Mapbox from Oct 23/24 adds duplicated/overlapping roads. Here NW 18th Ct. Kindly coordinate and fix (cross ref changeset 53190045)
piligab (2017-12-01 13:08:17+00:00): Hi carciofo.
Thank you for notifying us about this issue, My coworker Karito was fixed it in this changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54027811.
Regards!
thermo_nuclear (2017-10-23 20:54:52+00:00): я добавил точку центр для того, чтоб при поиске объектов или улиц писало, что они действительно в центре. А то вбиваешь в поиск "Большая Садовая", а оно тебе "Ростов-на-Дону, Ленгородок". В Новочеркасске аналогично.

Да и вообще у многих городов видел точечку центра, напр. Воронеж, Таганрог, Псков, Кострома, Красноярск.
Думаю, поможет в роутинге.

Если лишнее, всегда можно удалить
luiswoo (2017-10-23 22:00:31+00:00): Точки не достаточно, нужен ещё и контур. Место считается за место (place=*), если есть однотеговые точка и контур, что был поиск.
luiswoo (2017-10-23 22:08:11+00:00): Да, если в РнД "правильно" отметить "центр", то его границы будут пересекаться с границами уже официальных районов. В поиске районы тоже показывают http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=%D0%9A%D1%83%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B4%D0%B0.%D1%80%D1%83%20%D1%80%D0%BD%D0%B4#map=13/47.2572/39.7050
luiswoo (2017-10-23 22:21:51+00:00): pps2 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:place о теге place
eggie (2017-10-23 20:58:52+00:00): De cycle_barrier ligt hier los en zou onderdeel van de weg moeten zijn. Lukt je dat?
Casper Meijn (2017-10-27 19:54:31+00:00): Aangepast in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53301792
eggie (2017-10-27 20:50:56+00:00): oke...
carciofo (2017-11-23 14:24:11+00:00): Hi, this changeset among many others from your colleagues at Mapbox from Oct 23/24 adds duplicated/overlapping roads. Here NW 18th Ct. Kindly coordinate and fix (cross ref changeset 53189994)
karitotp (2017-11-23 14:41:59+00:00): Hi, thank you for notifying us about this issue, I've just fixed it in this changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54027811.
Regards!
Jack Manon (2017-10-23 22:44:58+00:00): Good work!
t_ja (2017-10-24 18:16:44+00:00): Ahoj,
kontroluješ si vôbec svoje zmeny pred tým, ako ich nahráš do OSM? Asi nie, lebo inak si neviem vysvetliť, ako môže premávať MHD Bratislava v Žiline: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/332486371 . A takýchto bodov je viacej, niekde sa to mieša s operator=DPMŽ a network=MHD Bratislava, čo dosť bije do očí.

Opäť prosím o kontrolu všetkých zmien a urýchlenú opravu.

T.
Valec (2017-10-24 19:42:49+00:00): Malo by byť všetko opravené (nenarazil som na nič s chybou). Počas úprav mi 3x zamrzol PC, takže niečo sa uložilo v neopravenej verzii.
*Martin* (2017-10-25 08:52:34+00:00): Prosim nepouzivat mrznuci pocitac pre editaciu v OSM.
74523978 (2017-10-24 15:14:44+00:00): Dit had ik pas geleden nog bijgewerkt (survey) en lag precies goed. Geen vooruitgang geconstateerd.
maraf24 (2019-07-07 14:57:31+00:00): Kościół jest pod innym wezwaniem.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1836746
vng_me (2018-01-03 21:32:02+00:00): Зачем вносить точки, без соответствующих тегов, с именами остановок, если рядом уже есть отмеченные остановки?
eggie (2017-10-24 10:10:57+00:00): Info naar BAG adresnode verplaatst. website en Phone toegevoegd.
mepper (2017-10-24 12:25:09+00:00): Top, dank je!
naoliv (2017-10-24 10:17:38+00:00): Carlos, bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap.
O que você quis representar aqui, por favor?
berndw (2017-10-24 16:22:14+00:00): Wenn Du einen Namen einfügst, solltest Du vielleicht highway=track erhalten, ansonsten wird dieser Weg nirgends angezeigt.

Ansonsten willkommen bei OSM
berndw (2017-10-24 16:24:35+00:00): Und einfach über andere schon vorhandene Wege sollte man einen Weg auch nicht führen, Verbindungen über Knoten müssen vorhanden sein
4004 (2017-10-23 21:24:15+00:00): здравствуйте ,
ну хорошо хоть теги с колодцев поменяли на скважины, но разве ж там газоны?
brianboru (2018-05-25 18:27:10+00:00): This footpath is a public right of way according to Warwicks CC. You have it as access=no. Do you mean no access for vehicles?
brianboru (2018-05-25 18:26:35+00:00): This footpath is a public right of way according to Warwicks CC. You have it as access=no. Do you mean no access for vehicles?
user_5359 (2017-10-28 16:50:06+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Verstehe ich den französischen Namen richtig als Zeuge Jehovas? Dann würde ich den passenden Religion und denomination Wert nachtragen.
surveyor54 (2017-11-18 13:59:24+00:00): Hi,
nur name=Löffelplatz bringt hier gar nichts, es fehlt ein physisches Tag. Was ist denn an dieser Stelle?

Gruß
surveyor54
Nakaner (2017-10-24 22:25:38+00:00): Hallo FrankXF,

warum hast du bei einigen Bahnsteigen (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/393245323) light_rail=yes entfernt?

Viele Grüße

Michael
FrankXF (2017-10-27 20:36:20+00:00): Hallo Michael, 
laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/VRR_Tagging ist das gar nicht vorgesehen. :-) Dort ist nur tram/bus/subway, etc. vorgesehen.
Wie auch immer, es ist nicht verpflichtend. Da alle U-Bahnen stop_position haben, ist es dort sinnvoller und da diese subways sind muss hier subway=yes stehen. Nur wenn es keine stop_position gibt, dann ist es auf der platform oder stop_area sinnvoll, meist bei Bussen.
Habe das mal konsequent auf bisher 3 Linen durchgezogen. Es war sehr verschieden getaggt. siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/VRR#Stadtbahnnetz_Rhein-Ruhr

Finde auch das light_rail eigentlich passender ist, aber so hat man sich geeinigt, also sollte es einheitlich sein.
Mfg, FrankXF
Nakaner (2017-11-07 12:43:50+00:00): Hallo FrankXF,

das Entfernen mag zwar richtig sein. Was ich eigentlich schreiben wollte, aber aus irgendeinem Grund dann noch nicht geschrieben habe, ist, dass du zwar light_rail=* gelöscht, aber kein tram=* ergänzt hast, sodass man jetzt nicht mehr erkennen kann, welchen Verkehrsmitteln dieser Bahnsteig dient.

Viele Grüße

Michael
FrankXF (2017-11-12 23:59:05+00:00): Hallo Michael, nach PT2 ist  tram=*, etc. auf platform gar nicht vorgesehen. Beim VRR tagging ist es auch nur empfohlen. 
Man kann es sofort an der Relation erkennen. IMHO ist es keine Eigenschaft der platform, was dort hält. Habe einige Beispiele wo Bus/Tram/Stadtbahn halten und sich das geändert hat.
Außerdem lässt sich damit der Konflikt tram oder light_rail vermeiden. 
Mfg, Frank
FrankXF (2017-11-13 00:03:24+00:00): Ich meinte tram oder subway, light_rail ist ja nicht vorsesehen.
jc86035 (2017-10-24 03:10:34+00:00): The imagery is probably out of date here and the layout keeps changing due to construction, so best to do it based on survey.
bgard (2017-10-24 21:21:39+00:00): Hello jc86035,

Thank you for pointing out the major construction in this area. In this case I was aligning using Mapbox imagery which I verified for accuracy using Strava. But for future edits I will be careful where road construction is underway.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-10-24 07:44:22+00:00): Po co dodajesz punkty adresowe, skoro już adresy są przypisane do budynków?
Lora Karch (2017-10-23 23:17:12+00:00): Great job on shaping up the buildings! I guess one comment I could add would be trying to label residential areas.
Lora Karch (2017-10-23 23:17:26+00:00): Great mapping!
SherbetS (2022-10-23 00:57:50+00:00): Hi Kirbert,

can you tell me what these objects are that you have added?

Thanks, SherbetS.
maxerickson (2017-10-27 16:41:02+00:00): Hi-

This edit introduced a small error and I just wanted to give you a tip for avoiding it. When you disconnected the little stub of Calle Estrella: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267368388 the operation also created a disconnection in the straight street, which happened to be made of 2 pieces.

To avoid the problem, you can use shift-click to select both the intersection that you want to break and the street you want to break away from it:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/3926#issuecomment-290087985

It really is a small error, don't worry about it, I mostly wanted to let you know about using shift-click to make changes to specific elements.

Thanks for mapping,

Max
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-10-25 10:15:57+00:00): You asked for a review, so here it is. This looks great! I'm not local to Tralee, so I can't check it's there, but I trust you. It's great that you added lots of details, like phone number, postcode, and address data. Keep it up!

One note: The "operator" tag shouldn't be put here, that's only for things like ATMs ("The operator of this ATM is [BANK]", some countries charge a fee for using an ATM outside your bank), or for things like bus routes ("The 45A is operated by Dublin Bus"). You don't need to put someone's personal details here.
andrewwiseman (2017-10-26 20:33:22+00:00): Hi, this mountain is officially called Mount Obama so I am going to fix it https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Obama
AsgerFrank (2017-10-27 12:08:19+00:00): Please disregard request for review.
DaveF (2017-10-24 12:53:14+00:00): Hi Morzo Welcome to OSM. 
Are you trying to map a building? Try https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
ndm (2017-10-24 20:56:18+00:00): I've had a quick go at adding the building, etc. It might not be great, but hopefully close enough so you can fix it.
DaveF (2017-10-24 21:23:57+00:00): Nice Update.

As it's a place where people stay/sleep on multiple nights I'll add landuse=residential.

I've not been through that development. Is all the rest commercial?
Apachy (2017-10-28 05:26:22+00:00): Поаккуратнее корректируйте! При изменении линии 534686412 улица Ферсмана стала кривая. Пока не исправляю, хочу чтобы вы сами увидели.
Allin_kindA (2017-10-29 06:20:45+00:00): Да, спасибо, поправил. Впредь не стесняйтесь "тыкать носом", так-как я ещё новичок в редактировании карт
Davie Dean (2017-10-24 06:34:47+00:00): There's nothing wrong with using footways to map sidewalks, in fact I think it is better and more detailed in the long run. It also allows you to indicate useful things like pedestrian specific crossings, and tactile paving.
Davie Dean (2017-10-24 06:36:24+00:00): Wiki page here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks. Both are acceptable, so I don't think removing someones mapping work to make a less detailed approach is a good idea.
aharvey (2017-10-24 08:57:12+00:00): Agreed both styles (separate way and sidewalk tags) can coexist.
aharvey (2017-11-04 23:35:22+00:00): No response from the mapper, so I've gone ahead and undeleted the footways while leaving the new sidewalk tags on the highways as both can coexist.

Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53516154

Undeleted with JOSM:
w524640907 w532523005 w524635444 w524635443 w524635442 w524640908 w524640159 w524641618 w524640906 w524633279 w524640161
John Castillo Soberano (2017-10-24 01:01:31+00:00): MBN DWAG-AM Transmitter
carciofo (2017-11-06 12:23:50+00:00): ALL lane and turn:lane information around El Dorado Airport was destroyed in this edit... sigh...
Corban8 (2017-11-08 21:31:14+00:00): I took a quick look over the changes that I made and under this change set and all I saw was that I added a speed limit to the road and changed the classification of a link. I don't know how these minor changes would effect turn lanes but If you could explain to me how this may have destroyed the turn lane information in this edit I would be more than happy to try and make changes to fix the issue. Thank you.
mcroes (2017-10-25 00:04:58+00:00): Some of the roads aren't traced closely but other than that really good job of mapping streets as well as residential areas
neuhausr (2017-10-26 20:31:56+00:00): Hi, I am a local mapper and noticed the recent edits to this node's tags. I think amenity=events_venue would be the best tag, as amenity=community_centre is for public places, and this appears to be a private venue.
herried (2017-10-31 15:10:16+00:00): Agreed. I was parsing through the tags and was a little confused. But, that definitely makes sense. Thanks for the update.

I am also a cartographer from Mpls and getting married there next September!

I will update the record.
neuhausr (2017-10-31 15:33:36+00:00): Congrats! Looks like a cool place.
Warin61 (2019-03-21 02:02:51+00:00): Hi
Adding a name to a node and nothing else does not add anything to the map. I take it the name 'water tank is a simple description, not the name. So I have deleted that . 
I have made a circular closed way and added the tags man_made=storage_tank, content=water. 
Please make better entries.
JJIglesias (2017-10-24 02:22:35+00:00): Hola y Gracias por editar #OSM-BO.
Para agregar el Hotel Falta el Nombre y otros datos como telefono. Podrias agregarlos.
Gracias
OSM-Inspector
maraf24 (2017-10-25 10:26:16+00:00): Miasto nazywa się "Lwówek Śląski", a nie "Lwówek".
Zmiana wycofana.
b-jazz (2018-11-10 20:12:27+00:00): FYI, the Bartlett River Trail you uploaded duplicated nodes (went all the way out and then doubled back along the same nodes). It also duplicated portions of the Lake Trail that you uploaded on the same day.
Thomas_M (2017-10-24 03:01:02+00:00): updating the start and abandoned date of logging roads based on already existing tags.

www.loggingroads.org
Thomas_M (2017-10-24 11:36:49+00:00): updating abandoned date based on already existing tags

www.loggingroads.org
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-25 09:11:10+00:00): Proszę, używaj sensownych opisów zmian. "kk" jest bezużyteczne,
5m4u9 (2017-10-24 05:16:59+00:00): hola, por lo general las escuelas las mapeamos con punto, ya que puede contener varias escuelas dentro de la misma infraestructura
Davie Dean (2017-11-09 00:00:50+00:00): Hey @stragu, nice work on the tree species, but I think they should be tagged species=..., not name=....
stragu (2017-11-09 00:03:00+00:00): yeah you're right, I keep getting confused because the app I use only has "name" in the preset.
carciofo (2017-11-23 14:20:59+00:00): Seems like your colleagues from Mapbox edited this place at the same time and resulted in not only duplicate turn restrictions, but duplicated ways as well. Please fix the relation and overlapping ways on NW 22nd St @ NW 67th Ave. Thanks (cross ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53196663)
Teesta (2017-12-04 04:01:18+00:00): Thanks for bringing this into notice. I went ahead and fixed the duplicated ways and the duplicate turn restriction.
carciofo (2017-11-23 14:20:48+00:00): Seems like your colleagues from Mapbox edited this place at the same time and resulted in not only duplicate turn restrictions, but duplicated ways as well. Please fix the relation and overlapping ways on NW 22nd St @ NW 67th Ave. Thanks (cross ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53196661)
Iqhra (2017-12-04 04:04:51+00:00): Hey, thanks for bringing this into notice. I went ahead and fixed the duplicated ways and the duplicate turn restriction.
carciofo (2017-12-15 20:54:01+00:00): US 1 south of Marlin Road was duplicated on this changeset. Kindly fix
mavl (2018-12-25 21:16:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:53:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:20:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:24:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:24:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:53:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:12:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:53:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
datendelphin (2017-10-24 19:45:06+00:00): Why did you shuffle the lanes to different ways on the bridge? Why split up the trunk south of the roundabout? 

There is no turn restriction. See https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Mxyk_ORixW4OX7iRxppetQ
ika-chan! (2017-10-24 20:08:46+00:00): According to https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/OCGA2618o24nDCjHRoQGuQ the northbound lanes south of the roundabout are only separated by a white line, hence I thought I should use "change:lanes", and the u-turn was created because I believe I cannot just do that at any junction. Nevertheless I reverted the whole changeset because I think I am not good enough or may be I should try again from scratch.
ika-chan! (2017-10-24 20:15:05+00:00): I should also add that I map each direction separately if the road is separated by a  visible central reservation raised by a kerb, regardless of surface.
datendelphin (2017-10-24 20:30:54+00:00): You are right about the split ways. I'm sorry, I misremembered that situation.
True it is an awkward turn, but it is not prohibited, so I would not map it.
As for not good enough, rest assured you are good. Sorry that I cam across as harsh, I was merely puzzled, and my apologies especially because you were right about the shuffling of the lanes indeed. I hope this incident will not deter you in contributing, and I hope to see more of your fine edits.
mavl (2017-10-24 16:36:59+00:00): Здравствуйте. В тегах addr:street и addr:housenumber использована точка с запятой.  
  
Например, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2697766292  
  
 Это не запрещено, но с адресами так обычно не поступают. Боюсь, что ни одна программа не найдёт ни один из этих адресов. Лучше указать каждый из адресов на отдельной точке.
pesec (2017-10-25 04:10:44+00:00): Эти адреса уже стояли в виде точек до моей правки. Я их перенес на углы зданий. В вид чужих записей не вникал. Попробую исправить.
mavl (2017-10-25 04:19:58+00:00): Да. Эти адреса были в виде отдельных точек внутри зданий. Это не ошибка.
carciofo (2017-12-06 11:54:43+00:00): Hi, Okeechobee Rd southeast of NW 72nd Ave has been duplicated in this changeset. Kindly fix. Thanks in advance. https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/344
carciofo (2018-01-10 16:06:25+00:00): Hi, just wondering if you could have a look at this? It's been there since Oct of last year... Would appreciate it if you could have a look and remove the duplicate. Thanks in advance.
Bhojaraj (2018-01-11 06:45:02+00:00): Hi,
Sorry for late in replying and thanks for letting me know this, fixed it in this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55343164.
mueschel (2017-10-27 18:30:16+00:00): Please watch out for the correct spelling of tags - just corrected 4 different misspellings of 'implicit' on several ways.
Владимир К (2017-10-24 11:59:39+00:00): этот разворот был и так отмечен как строящийся. по нему не должно вести.
RicoElectrico (2017-10-27 14:34:59+00:00): Cześć. Przypominam, że oprócz nazwy ulicy trzeba zmienić ulicę w adresach. Już to poprawiam. 

Post na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=389016#p389016
carciofo (2017-12-06 09:48:32+00:00): Hi, you've duplicated eastbound SW 11th St in this changeset. Kindly fix. Thanks. https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/344
Bhojaraj (2017-12-06 10:46:18+00:00): Hi, fixed the duplicated highway here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54397023
manog_nya (2019-05-22 08:01:05+00:00): "    Hi adiatmad,

                                  Trust you are well.While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across way 
way 534774261
 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this road seems to be hanging as there is no path existing.
Please look into this and share your observations
Thanks in Advance."
user_6110846 (2017-10-24 08:32:26+00:00): для общественных заведений как муз школа building= civic
mavl (2017-10-24 16:45:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту  [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
В этом пакете правок добавлены два почти одинаковых офиса. Это ошибка (просто дубликат) или так действительно задумано?
user_6110846 (2017-10-24 08:28:46+00:00): согласно вики-  правилу  names нельзя в names названия идентичные названиям категорий . https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names раздел Names is the Names only  здесь
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-29 01:12:25+00:00): Hi, in this changeset way 37132157 which is tagged as a public footpath has had foot=no set. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-29 01:18:44+00:00): There seem to be several other ways that also have odd looking access tags.
AJR-GB (2017-10-31 08:12:57+00:00): Thanks Mike, have updated changeset way 37132157, it is listed as a path rather than footpath but have updated foot=yes. Will review the others again this week. thanks.
Mike Baggaley (2017-10-31 08:17:26+00:00): Sorry, I was unclear, I meant it has designation=public_footpath, which should imply foot=designated.
AJR-GB (2017-10-31 08:43:57+00:00): Thanks for the clarification, i will double check
Constable (2017-10-24 12:43:50+00:00): ciao, guarda che questa strada (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534805593) però è sovrapposta alla via Corridoni già mappata.
Per favore rimuovi il tratto da te mappato ed eventualmente aggiorna i tag del tratto che era già presente sulla mappa
Grazie, ciao