piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dieterdreist (2019-05-06 12:03:39+00:00): Hallo Silverman,
ich weiss nicht genau, ob Du das so angelegt hast oder das schon so war (schreibe hier, weil das die letzte Bearbeitung des Unicampus Tal war). M.E. sollten die Straßen ausgenommen werden, sie sind nicht Teil des Unigeländes sondern öffentliches Straßenland.
geri-oc (2019-09-29 17:36:59+00:00): Hier das selbe mit dem name=Kugelweg, wo ist der offiziell nachvollziehbar angezeigt (on the Ground)?

Note that OSM follows the On the Ground Rule. Names recorded in name=* tag are ones that are locally used, especially ones typically signposted.[1]

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

Gruß Gerd
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-13 16:11:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136059221 where the changeset comment is: Reverting MAPS.ME garbage such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10893535607 .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7125
vasony (2019-06-05 08:19:42+00:00): Szia!

Miért van az utcának 2 neve?
Május 1. utca / Szent László utca?

Tamás
grozsa11 (2019-06-05 09:04:59+00:00): Szia! Régi név. Van ahol még a házon is kint van. Ezt valami más mezőbe kell ilyenkor tenni? Gza
grozsa11 (2019-06-05 09:21:04+00:00): A település hivatalos Szabályozási tervlapján egyébként a Bajcsy-Zs-tól DK-felé eső szakaszra "Május 1. út" van írva, az attól ÉNy-felé eső részre pedig a "Szent László utca" fölirat... úgyhogy nem könnyű :- (
grozsa11 (2019-06-05 09:21:21+00:00): A szabályozási tervlap elérhetősége: http://www.pomaz.hu/downloads/file/1152
vasony (2019-06-05 09:38:36+00:00): A kettő közül melyik név? :) Mert szent lászlóra nincs hivatkozás.

Egyébként az old_name mezőbe kell tenni a régi nevet, a name mezőbe pedig az újat.

Ha a utcanévtáblán még/már nincs kint, akkor én nem írnám át a name mezőt.
ha csak a terven van meg, akkor alt_name-be tenném az utcanévtáblától eltérőt, és tennék egy note-ot is rá leíva mi a helyzet.

Ha lenne egy önkormányzati határozat róla, az megint más, így a szabályozási terv az még nem biztos hogy mérvadó.

A 2 részt el lehet vágni ha más a neve, ezzel nincs gond.

Bajzsy-tól délre eltér újraindul a házszámozás, vagy konzisztens a két szakasszal?
vasony (2019-06-05 09:42:52+00:00): na, szóval kicsit hosszú lett, összefoglalva:
ha biztosan tudjuk, hogy a Szent László a régi név, akkor az 
old_name=Szent László utca 
name=Május 1. utca.

látom a IV. Béla / Asztalos Sándorra is ez a helyzet
grozsa11 (2019-06-05 10:14:35+00:00): Köszi a segítséget! Kimegyek a helyszínre is előbb egyszer még és aztán föltehetően ez az old_name tag lesz amibe beteszem a helyszínen kevésbé használtat. Sajnos a Szabályozási tervlapok bár hivatalosak, de elég régiek a környéken... :- (   Gza
vasony (2019-06-13 07:28:03+00:00): Átmenetileg beállítottam így, ha felmérted és szükséges, akkor javítsd át.
RafalR (2019-07-13 11:53:28+00:00): Przy nazwach ulic nie używamy skrótów - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Skr%C3%B3ty_(nie_r%C3%B3b_tego!)
iWowik (2019-04-30 05:21:58+00:00): День добрый!
Придерживайтесь, пожалуйста, соглашения о наименовании
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183811217/history
dktue (2020-12-04 17:06:15+00:00): Beeindruckend! :-)
viloan (2019-04-29 07:36:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DaxServer (2019-04-29 11:44:58+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM :)

In this changeset, there is a modification for another road in Vijayawada. I hope this is unintentional.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/374233779

Can you please revert this part?

Best, Srihari.
eggie (2019-04-30 07:05:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Bedankt voor je bijdrage. In OSM taggen we info bij op de reeds bestaande adresnodes. Ook wordt geen adresinfo en naam op een gebouw gezet. Ik pas wat aan.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-30 07:12:59+00:00): De info naar de adresnode verplaatst.. website en phone toegevoegd.
office estate_agent toegevoegd voor de rendering.
Rendering duurt even..
MVG,
Eggie
Sierd Moll (2019-05-04 11:54:11+00:00): Prima dank je
Palolo (2019-06-26 03:53:19+00:00): We appreciate the help, but ask that you please follow the directions to make square corners on the buildings.
yellowsoar (2019-05-26 08:59:56+00:00): 位置錯誤，新崙公園並不在這裡。
Supaplex (2019-08-09 15:44:51+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
iWowik (2019-04-30 05:34:31+00:00): День добрый!
Придерживайтесь, пожалуйста, соглашения о наименовании
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685626252/history
dval (2019-08-16 16:29:48+00:00): Возле Волчанска Вы нарисовали реку, но обозначили ее как natural=water, в то время как надо было waterway=river.
dval (2019-10-15 07:57:25+00:00): Нарисовано много уже не существующих домов в Вьюжном, напр. Используйте Maxar снимки, они более свежие. Многие дома нарисованы неаккуратно, больше по размерам, чем есть в реальности.
дмитрий солодков (2019-10-15 10:57:52+00:00): Сейчас исправлю
дмитрий солодков (2019-10-15 11:11:33+00:00): вот кстати на других картах эти домики уже есть, и судя по всему они свежие
dval (2019-10-15 11:56:28+00:00): Севернее значка Вьюжный я нарисовал большой жилой 3-эт. дом (такие здесь строят, я их вижу постоянно), а севернее - снесенные дома для следующего такого дома. На более старом снимке (Esri WI) дома еще не снесены, а нового дома еще нет. Поэтому предположу, что я прав. Есть в планах прогуляться в то место, посмотрю в натуре.
bobwz (2019-05-02 23:40:18+00:00): Greetings! I was hoping you could help me understand this edit. It looks like you created a new way 686586789 which was a copy of the existing way (483842488) and added the existing field way into a new relation. Did you mean to edit the existing relation and way 483842488? This way and the old relation has all the history for the stadium edits.
bobwz (2019-05-10 17:53:37+00:00): It's been some time and I haven't seen any updates. I'll go ahead and merge your changes into the existing ways to preserve the tags and history.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-29 15:56:09+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-29 15:55:59+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Jordi MF (2019-04-29 19:31:21+00:00): Hola Ornios,

Enhorabuena por el trabajo que estás haciendo en la mejora de los datos de OSM. He visto que has realizado muchas modificaciones y has añadido información respecto al nombre de diferentes elementos. Me gustaría recomendarte que, cuando añadas un nombre en valenciano en la etiqueta "name", también añadas la etiqueta "name:ca" con el mismo nombre. Puede parecer información redundante, pero no lo es ya que además de indicar que la información de la etiqueta "name" está en valenciano, también es útil para el usuario final que tiene configurado como idioma predefinido el catalán/valenciano en su dispositivo. En caso contrario, probablemente el dispositivo usará la segunda lengua elegido por el usuario (normalmente el castellano).

De nuevo, muchas gracias por tu trabajo. Saludos,

Jordi
Ornios (2019-04-29 20:43:53+00:00): Hola Jordi, 

No ponía la etiqueta "name:ca" a elementos cuyo nombre original ya estaba en catalán, porque, como bien dices, pensaba que no era necesario volver a especificarlo. A partir de ahora lo anadiré.

Un saludo y gracias por el apunte. Siempre hay lugar para la mejora. :)
dval (2019-08-14 21:34:08+00:00): Здесь Вы нарисовали residential area и buildind так, что они пересекают друг друга. Так не должно быть.
dval (2019-08-14 21:35:04+00:00): 49 штук таких ошибок.
sasanrst (2019-06-11 04:24:05+00:00): سلام
وقت بخیر
این محدوده ای که برای شهرک گلستان رسم کردید رو میشه بگید از چه منبعی رسم کردید؟
کاملا این محدوده اشتباهه
archie (2019-04-29 18:15:57+00:00): Please do read the help-pages first, before you change tagging. Here you can study why it should be highway=path and not highway=cycleway: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_universal_tag
ftcat (2019-04-29 15:19:51+00:00): I can assure you this bridge does not have a curve to it. I have been to it many times. The imagery in this area causes it to appear to have a curve if you download the uploaded tracks in JOSM you will see they are all straight.
ftcat (2019-04-29 15:22:14+00:00): Have a look at DigitalGlobe Premium imagery to see the correct alignment
rosey100 (2019-04-29 19:04:59+00:00): Thanks for pointing out the preferred imagery and GPS traces here, I’ll make sure to take a look at those before making any further adjustments.
ftcat (2019-04-29 19:42:44+00:00): There is no preferred imagery, it varies greatly even with the same providers. If you zoom in and out with DigitalGlobe Premium imagery you can see the images are taken at different times of the year and slightly different angles. An interesting point is by how much the level of the Zambezi varies at different times of the year, from hardly any water to levels where the gorge is obscured by the spray.
rosey100 (2019-04-29 21:08:58+00:00): Okay, thanks for making the updates to this bridge.
Константин Гам (2019-05-05 17:20:19+00:00): Опять роутинг сломан! Вы выучите теги пожалуйста прежде чем редактировать граф дорог. + рисуйте то что есть на местности, без фантазий!!! Откатываю
eggie (2019-04-30 06:41:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Dit lijkt me niet onder de definitie van een park vallen.
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-30 06:49:43+00:00): reverted door  Wijzigingenset #69721411
iWowik (2019-04-30 05:31:57+00:00): День добрый!
Придерживайтесь, пожалуйста, соглашения о наименовании
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686595927/history
GPMapper (2020-02-06 06:22:52+00:00): OK
ForstEK (2019-04-29 11:24:11+00:00): gvr:codes by http://textual.ru/gvr/index.php?card=240351
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-30 06:37:33+00:00): #test #failed
freebeer (2019-05-03 15:39:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69849212 where the changeset comment is: test deleted.
Retired Account (2019-04-29 11:57:58+00:00): Hi,
Can you double check if the postal code is correct? It appears that the previous postal code seems to be in order.
kokoleka (2019-05-02 11:44:35+00:00): Yup. I got it from their website. Called them today and the exact postal code is 828761 though.
eggie (2019-04-30 06:47:10+00:00): Je hebt hier alle landuse verwijderd. Dus je ziet geen detail meer. Verder heb je helaas schade veroorzaakt omdat je hebt geschoven met de kaart in editmodus. Je verplaatste daardoor onbedoeld adresnodes. Dit was je edit.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69687690
Bij bijdrage zal worden teruggedraaid.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-30 06:48:48+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #69721375
eggie (2019-04-30 06:44:46+00:00): Dit is wel de juiste manier om een park te duiden. Wat is er op de plaats gekomen waar je landuse=forest hebt verwijderd?
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-30 06:54:24+00:00): Landuse forest hersteld.. adres verwijderd
Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. 
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group

Gr eggie
edissono9 (2019-05-06 18:49:15+00:00): colegio rio de piedras
carciofo (2019-05-15 12:36:49+00:00): ?
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-29 15:55:54+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PT-53 (2019-04-29 12:13:19+00:00): gelöscht
pitscheplatsch (2019-04-30 07:04:44+00:00): Hi atpl_pilot,

sind die Gebäude und Adressen alle selbst erfasst und gemappt oder handelt es sich hier um ein Datenimport? Danke.

Siehe: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69688484
atpl_pilot (2019-04-30 07:38:02+00:00): Das ist alles selbst abgezeichnet. Seit kurzem habe ich dort einen engen Freund wohnen, der mir bei der Erfassung der Adressen hilft.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-01 05:16:06+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.

Wenn ich es richtig sehe, hätte evtl. der Source Tag des Changesets hier, besser folgendes enthalten sollen: "source = Geoportal Berlin / DOP20RGB (2018); Hausumringe"
Jrachi (2025-03-14 08:38:04+00:00): Ciao.
sulla relazione hai messo network=rcn
che significa che è in una rete ciclistica e non escursionistica
Sarebbe più corretto network=lwn?

Ivo
Walk60 (2025-03-27 16:27:15+00:00): Ciao Ivo, scusa per il ritardo.
In effetti hai ragione, a dire il vedo se non avessi visto dalla cronologia che la modifica è mia, ti direi che non l'ho fatta io, probabilmente è stata una svista involontaria.
Comunque ho corretto.
Ciao Ubaldo
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-29 15:55:49+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Adamant1 (2019-04-30 02:39:18+00:00): What "damage" exactly did you repair? you can't just go and revert people's changes without saying what exactly the issue was or without commenting on their changeset first. Otherwise, your edit warring. 

I thought Santa Cruz could be edited. So can it? or is it only OK to edit it with your permission and how you want it to be?
stevea (2019-04-30 02:48:38+00:00): As long as you remain a Contributor in good standing, you are welcome to edit OSM in Santa Cruz or anywhere on Earth.  However, when you violate (as I say in the changeset comments as to my source) "OSM conventions" (of not damaging existing and valid data, which is considered vandalism), then you are not welcome.

The damage was (at least, there may be more, as this list is not comprehensive) to Twin Lakes Neighborhood Park, commercial zone represented by way/41171135 and residential landuse way/41170853.

I see 97% or so of your edits are done with iD, perhaps you want to graduate to a less-beginner-oriented editor, one where you might be prone to make fewer mistakes after you've learned how to use it.
stevea (2019-04-30 02:50:07+00:00): Anybody watching:  permission to treat the witness as hostile?
iandees (2019-04-30 03:01:24+00:00): If you can't say something constructive then don't say anything at all. Avoid each other until you can speak like you're both older than a 6 year old.

I don't know what the deal is between you two, but you need to resolve it and not spit at each other in changeset comments. This is embarrassing for the project.
stevea (2019-04-30 03:06:55+00:00): Thank you, Ian.
Adamant1 (2019-04-30 03:14:08+00:00): "Twin Lakes Neighborhood Park" 

I didn't edit Twin Lakes Neighboorhood Park in any way that I'm aware of. Let alone in any way that couldn't have been easily adjusted, without also reverting a bunch of perfectly fine mapped houses and businesses in the process. Your obviously just looking for an excuses to act out a personal grudge. 

Also, it's not your call to make who's welcome in OSM or not, or for what.
Adamant1 (2019-04-30 03:43:23+00:00):  iandees, we both agreed we were going to be civil to each other and not go off anymore yesterday. Today though, he reverted a bunch of houses I mapped. In no is it "spitting" for me to ask him why. I also shouldn't have to just "work it out" with someone who repeatedly does back handed, vengeful,  things like that. Especially after I wasted most of yesterday trying to do just that for nothing.

I had reported him to the DWG before when he was doing the same thing, but apparently either they never talked to him about it like they should have or it didn't do any good. Either way, if a user repeatedly causes problems and revert hundreds of edits done by someone multiple times and the there are no consequences for it, then it will just continue like it is. If you genuinely want it to stop, maybe message the DWG a message asking them to actually deal with it. 

I'm not kowtowing by stopping editing in an area I have every right to just because someone makes an issue out of it though. Nor am I going "resolve" things with someone who constantly acts the way he does, through edit wars, and repeatedly lies about his wish to get along. Take it up with the DWG if you have a problem with it. It's probably the only way it will get dealt with. In the meantime, I have every right to map around here and I'm not going to stop doing it just because he want's be a bully and act like he owns the place. 

Thanks for the comment though.
stevea (2019-04-30 03:50:22+00:00): "Hundreds of edits?"  That is a slanderous untruth.
Adamant1 (2019-04-30 04:01:19+00:00): It was at least a 150 houses etc this time reverted me, and then a bunch of edits last time. So, like 200-250ish edits if not more like 300-350. That's hundreds. Unless your talking about changesets. Then it's less. But whatever the number, high or low, or whatever metric you want to go by, it's still just as wrong and you shouldn't have done it. Especially not twice and especially after you wasted a bunch of time saying you wanted to get along and that you weren't going screw with me again after the first time.
stevea (2019-04-30 04:04:38+00:00): I have nothing good to say here, so I'll say nothing at all.  Except what I just said.
Adamant1 (2019-04-30 04:05:54+00:00): If you hadn't of lied multiple times about your civility, wish to get along, etc etc and then screwed with my edits repeatedly instead, we wouldn't even be having this conversion right now. So it's 100% on you. I hope the DWG does actually talk to you this time. They really should deal with you. I'm as sick of this none sense as everyone else is.
stevea (2019-04-30 04:09:31+00:00): I have nothing good to say here, so I'll say nothing at all.
Adamant1 (2019-04-30 04:27:19+00:00): Btw iandees, I also reported him to an admin on the wiki about a week and a half ago for the same kind of stuff. They didn't do anything either. I even told him multiple times that I'd welcome talking to someone from the DWG if he wanted to report me for anything I've done. Know one ever contacted me though. Either because he never talked to them or they just decided not to get involved for some reason. At least I did what I could on on my side to resolve this in a civil manor, but like I said, I'm not going to just quietly go map somewhere else when someone deletes a bunch of stuff I mapped. So, I don't know what people expect.
Adamant1 (2019-04-30 05:00:06+00:00): also for anyone interested here's a few choice things he's said just today, when I was minding my own business, not contacting him and also after we had both agreed yesterday we where going to be civil to each other and not do this kind of thing anymore (I hadn't contacted him sense then. So these comments are completely un-provoked). Just to back up what I said above about this. People can see a bunch of similar comments by him in many notes scattered around here. 

"What is Adamant1 babbling about? Resolving."

"To others who watch him/here, he truly can't say something without being insulting. Watch."

"I won't say STFU to you again, but that's the sentiment of me and others."

"you are like spoon-feeding a baby, sometimes, Adamant1"

"you waste time with so many words. Map" (said at the same time he's reverting the thing I'm mapping). 

"I did deal with it, exactly as I just described, with integrity and aplomb. Much more than you do"

"I don't know if it is because you are poor at editing multipolygons, (I hope the above helps) poor social skills in a shared map project, or both. But once again: map" (again, while he was reverting me). 

"Go back to square one and assert some truth (somewhere) without weasel words or insults." (while making the comment two below this one).

"You merely appear to want to litter as many "this looks poopy," "that looks poopy" tags as many places as you can."

"you're like a mouse against an elephant: little, weak, poorly constructed" (extremely un-called for).

"Argumentative and deliberately provocative. No reason to keep this open; resolving." (while calling me little and weak).

"Verbally abusive vandal wants to bullyrag and annoy, then offers word salad babble explanation. Resolving as baloney."

There's many more things he said that are just as bad and that was just today, right after he said he wanted to get along. When I wasn't even talking to him. So, yeah, we'll just resolve it....right....
iandees (2019-04-30 05:08:33+00:00): Sure, you both have said some dumb things publicly I can't imagine what private messages look like. As I said, this and other threads between you two are embarrassing and childish. Please find a different way to express yourself.