piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pio2_122 (2020-07-29 21:22:09+00:00): Mam sporo uwag odnośnie tej zmiany:
1) Zdublowałeś adres Szkolna 10 - ten adres jest przypisany do konkretnego budynku (OSP);
2) Jak wspomniałem wyżej: adresy są przypisane do konkretnych budynków, a nie do obszarów. Poza tym utrudnia to działanie nawigacji (najbliższa droga do danego obszaru to nie zawsze najbliższa [i poprawna] droga do konkretnego budynku z adresem na takim obszarze - można dotrzeć od tyłu, pod ogrodzenie);
3) Prawidłowe nazewnictwo jednostek straży pożarnej to: "Jednostka Ratowniczo-Gaśnicza PSP w Miejscowości, Komenda Miejska PSP w Miejscowości, Ochotnicza Straż Pożarna w Miejscowości" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity=fire%20station?uselang=pl - tak też dodałem, ale niestety zmieniłeś to, bez sprawdzenia poprawności, na nijaką nazwę "Ochotnicza Straż Pożarna"... Nie wspominając już, że nazwa zgodna z zasadami wiki jest umieszczona na budynku (a mapujemy wg nazw występujących w terenie, o ile nie są sprzeczne z zasadami OSM), stronie internetowej OSP, itp.
4) Dodanie OSP jako obszaru nie ma zupełnie sensu. Jak widać na zdjęciach ortofoto, wokół jednostki nie ma nic z nią związanego - jest to ogólnodostępny plac.
Mam wrażenie, że na siłę dodałeś tu landuse...

W związku z tak rażącymi błędami pozwoliłem sobie to poprawić.
matebart (2020-07-30 08:18:20+00:00): W porządku. Rozumiem. Kajam się.
eggie (2020-07-29 21:14:44+00:00): Dag Luca.. Kijk even of de vlag de lading dekt.... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Doutdoor_seating
Dat is een terras bij een uitspanning. .. ;cafe

Moeten het geen picnic plaatsen zijn?
Gr eggie
sekai128 (2020-07-29 21:37:00+00:00): Oh, je hebt gelijk, foutje. Ik zal er banken van maken; ik zie geen tafels namelijk.
eggie (2020-07-29 21:45:16+00:00): leisure=picnic_table

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table
marc__marc (2020-10-15 09:43:09+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/695940535
une typo s'est glissé dans la clef renseignant la date de la dernière visite sur le terrain.
c'est survey:date et non survey_date
par ailleurs, est-ce correct d'avoir mis la date de 2015 pour une modif envoyée en 2020 ?
pour termine, source Terrain se dit survey dans la terminologie osm :)
Cordialement,
Marc
daviddelon (2020-10-15 10:35:17+00:00): Bonjour,
En fait, je n'ai fait que rajouter nom et horaire sans vérifier les autres tags, précedemment crées, voir https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88697842&relations=true , je corrige donc. Merci pour l'indication sur survey.
David.
Nmxosm (2020-07-30 09:22:03+00:00): Hallo swiki,

vielen Dank für diese umfangreichen Änderungen. Das ist beeindruckend.

VlG Nmxosm
Jrachi (2022-04-19 19:26:19+00:00): Ciao.
Hai usato uno strano mix di tag non corretti.
Suggerirei di usare:
mappare come area
geological=giants_kettle
name=Marmitte dei Giganti
natural=bare_rock

E questo anche per le altre formazioni simili che vedo hai mappato lungo la costa.
mtbtricase (2022-04-20 07:37:23+00:00): perfetto... si tratta di questo tipo di fenomeno naturale di erosione

https://www.salentoacolory.it/la-marmitta-del-gigante/
marc__marc (2021-02-20 15:12:19+00:00): Bonjour,
Je cherche de la documentation sur boules=breton afin de compléter le wiki, quel est sa particularité par rapport aux autres variantes ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Koun (2021-02-20 18:57:26+00:00): Bonjour,

Dans le wiki il est écrit "si d'autres types, existent, n'hésitez pas à utiliser la valeur qui vous semble correcte et à la documenter".

J'ai donc apporté cet attribut. C'est utile car ce terrain n'est pas autorisé à la pétanque. 
Les terrains de boule bretonne ont des spécificités (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boule_bretonne). Avec des variantes régionales...

Bien cdlt,
marc__marc (2021-02-21 10:01:59+00:00): Merci pour  votre retour.
vous avez très bien fait de le faire, c'était justement mon but de trouver ce qui manque avec cette phrase :)
d'après wikipedia, la principale différence que j'ai compris, c'est la possibilité d'utiliser la bordure latérale, je vais documenter cela sur lr wiki osm.org
Koun (2021-02-21 11:39:19+00:00): Avec la requête "sport=boules" dans overpass (https://overpass-turbo.eu/) on voit que le type est peu renseigné.
AlaskaDave (2024-02-05 01:39:09+00:00): I was surprised and, to be brutally honest, a little bit dismayed to see this import in Alaska. It's good to have a source of data to fill in empty regions in the vast area occupied by Alaska but the NHD rendering of rivers drives me crazy. Thousands of little segments, most unnamed, some comprised of two nodes connecting two other short segments. It's simply horrible. I have done a ton of correcting of these blasted imports over the years but life is short and lately I haven't the patience to do what needs to be done. Plus, some of the water features I added a few years ago were overwritten by the NHD data.

Sorry to be so negative. I appreciate the amount of work you did to make this import happen but sometimes I wonder if NHD imports are worth the amount of effort they require to make them accurate.
Ser9ei (2021-04-09 19:11:50+00:00): без height и min_height building_parts работать не будут
 https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=60.4623000&lon=33.1394168&zoom=20&camera.theta=31.249&camera.phi=11.746
fdjrgio (2021-04-12 21:49:34+00:00): Буду благодарен вам, если вы добавите эту информацию!
Ser9ei (2021-04-13 07:50:26+00:00): Скиньте ссылку на фото здания, чтобы примерно представлять пропорции.
ovruni (2020-07-29 21:40:17+00:00): Hola, he notado que en esta edición se ha estado retirando etiquetas en vías de parques y se han agregado en un nodo en su lugar, por favor revisar la documentación para la etiqueta leisure=park [0] (parte derecha), donde se indica el uso de estas etiquetas en las vías (no en nodos). Para cualquier consulta sobre como editar puede hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos 
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
johnarupire (2020-08-11 02:06:35+00:00): Hola San Luis - Serenazgo, 
además de la información que te da Ovruni, si necesitas ayuda con la wiki de openstreetmap o con algún otro recurso, no duden en entrar en el canal que tenemos en telegram para ayudarte a resolverlas. http://t.me/osmpe 
te esperamos, saludos!
abrensch (2020-10-10 07:59:10+00:00): Hello rkumreo,

are you sure about that no-left-turn?

looks for me in Mappiliary that the sign belongs to the actual crossing and not to the turning-bridge before?

thanx, Arndt
rkumreo (2020-10-13 03:31:46+00:00): Hi Arndt,

Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, I have misinterpreted the sign board and added the turn restrictions. thanks for the suggestion. Please find the changeset for the reversion ( #92382222) . Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks,
rkumreo
Polarbear (2020-12-02 19:16:44+00:00): Could you please explain why you added that turn restriction, based on which image from those you cited?
I checked the situation on the ground, it is possible to turn, and there is even a turn lane.
In case there was a temporary restriction, please map them only if you are willing to monitor them, and mark them as temporary!
Fixed.
rkumreo (2020-12-04 07:15:23+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for checking into our edits. I have missed checking the lane markings. I have added the restrictions based on the sign board (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=u-PC3Hht2pdjVfMZVhRzyQ&focus=photo&lat=52.469351646197424&lng=13.490627688570612&z=16.779496173169072&x=0.4832814440248491&y=0.6953793840573872&zoom=0). Thanks for improvising my edits with the ground knowledge. Always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
rkumreo
b-jazz (2020-07-31 00:13:56+00:00): FYI, the woods that you added overlap with a house/building that added a year ago. I'm assuming that the house is still there, but I didn't dig too deep. Here is the house in question: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652523803
sermer (2020-07-31 00:39:03+00:00): Yup, the house is still there and the woods I added also overlap quite a few of the houses. I’m not looking at the satellite imagery right now but that is usually when the trees have grown over the top of the roof.
b-jazz (2020-08-03 17:18:50+00:00): I conferred with others in the community and they agreed that when outlining woods like these that the way should include just the base of the trees and not their canopy so that we avoid having woods and buildings overlap each other.
sermer (2020-08-03 18:07:23+00:00): A couple questions:
1) Could you please provide a source for that? Looking at the OSM wiki, It describes it as a “Tree-covered area”. I conferred with myself and would describe a building covered by a tree canopy as being a “Tree-covered area”. I map what’s there, it’s up to those who make the tiles to handle it. 
2) How would that be at all possible? These maps are made from aerial imagery. The canopy is between the base of the trees and the sky...I’m a local but I’m not about to walk around to every single tree to see where the base is.
b-jazz (2020-08-03 22:44:43+00:00): 1) It was a discussion on the OSM US Slack channel. I have a vague recollection that I only mentioned it because JOSM complained about them overlapping, but I'm not 100% sure about that.
2) If it were me, I'd just mark up to an existing building, but not intersect it. 

Anyway, it's not worth arguing over. I just thought I'd mention it and see if you're amenable to adjusting your mapping slightly.

Say Hi to Benny for me.
ovruni (2020-07-29 21:54:06+00:00): Hola, en esta edición se han eliminado etiquetas, por favor al cambiar la geometría evitar que se pierda información del lugar.
Saludos
ovruni (2020-07-29 21:44:12+00:00): Hola, lo mismo que lo comentado en el conjunto de cambios https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88699035 . Por otra parte, por favor revisar la documentación sobre lo recomendado en los buenos conjuntos de cambios[1]. 
Saludos
ovruni (2020-07-29 22:05:32+00:00): Se me habia olvidado ingresar el enlace https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
Cascafico (2020-07-30 08:27:51+00:00): in questi casi, perchè perdere il nome? Metti piuttosto un "disused:" davanti a path oppure access=no
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88699732
marc__marc (2022-07-09 19:10:27+00:00): Bonjour,
je ne comprend pas la Rue Eugénie Eboué :
vous avez renseigné un premier troncçon rue piétonne (donc assez large pour un véhicule  mais interdit à ceux-ci) et plus à l'est un tronçon autorisé aux voitures mais pour lequel tout traffic est limité par un panneau limitant l'accès à la destination.
par oü arrivent les voitures dans le tronçon à l'est ?
et les piétons eux-mêmes ne peuvent pas y aller pour par exemple se rendre au no 9 ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Yorvik Prestigitator (2020-07-30 00:18:36+00:00): I think you might be mixing up Fountayne Street with Vyner Street.
You can't turn left into Vyner Street from Haxby Road because Vyner Street is oneway towards Haxby Road, and there are signs alerting you to that no left turn.
I am not aware of any signs or any reason you cannot turn left into Fountayne Street
rkumreo (2020-07-30 15:58:54+00:00): Hi 

Thanks for the suggestion, I have mistakenly added the turn restriction. Please find the changeset(88742062) for the suggested corrections. Thanks for the quick correction. Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks,
rkumreo
Cascafico (2020-07-30 08:26:07+00:00): che problemi aveva il sentiero che hai cancellato?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88700227
andergrin (2020-07-31 06:34:10+00:00): Не треба блоки гаражів обводити індивідуальними полігонами, все обводиться одним полігоном, і пишеться building=garages
rombik97 (2023-05-29 06:48:06+00:00): Path #832028393: This supposed path, or at least the northernmost 100-200m section, is very inaccessible. Please be careful and considerate and tag appropriately! At least 100m are completely exposed scrambling along the southern cliff side, it's no joke at all and hardly a path per se.

Aquest suposat camí, o al menys la secció més septentrional, és MOLT inaccessible. Si us plau sigueu considerats editant el mapa i al menys etiqueteu clarament! Al menys 100m estaven completament exposats, requerint una travessia al llarg de la cresta penjats de la roca amb dificultat significativa, no és cap broma.
trial (2022-01-09 23:02:49+00:00): Hi, you've added a second alt_mane:eo : this is not accepted as a name has to be a name, not many. Maybe you can move one value to another field (old_name:eo, ...) so that both names are usable. Right now none is.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88700560
trial (2022-01-09 23:06:40+00:00): I mean for Taiwan: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/449220
itineris (2020-12-17 19:45:59+00:00): Szia!

Ez annyira nem sikerült. :)
(Pl. a zebrán átvezetett buszmegálló.)
Javítottam.

Üdv:
Ákos
GinaroZ (2020-07-30 12:59:47+00:00): I've added tracktype=5 to this as well
vojaj (2020-10-11 11:49:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Hjart (2020-08-02 16:24:12+00:00): Jeg har skrottet den relation du lavede her, eftersom den ikke var hensigtsmæssig
user_2066394 (2020-08-04 11:12:40+00:00): Was sagt dieses Changeset aus? Ist das ein Anbau mit Cafeteria/Kantine?
Filip009 (2021-06-29 18:30:08+00:00): Ahoj, do budúcna prosím prepájaj chodníky, tam kde sa prelínajú.
Illio (2023-04-27 22:38:35+00:00): Mohli by ste uviesť zdroj zakreslenej navrhovanej trate tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/380277256 ?
ndm (2020-07-30 19:21:08+00:00): I've removed the turn restriction -- there's nothing visible on Mapilary.
rkumreo (2020-07-31 12:46:04+00:00): Hi

Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, I have misinterpreted the sign board (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=c4lfxdvqXzBEqv5fh5Z6Gw&focus=photo&lat=51.54720881787793&lng=-2.437757531441889&z=16.779496173169072&x=0.44833049579719636&y=0.4799504461017074&zoom=0.6643598615916951) as it is placed at the entrance of the entity. I have cross verified again and realized that it is meant for Churchward Road. Going forward, I will be more cautious while adding the turn restrictions. Thanks for the quick correction. Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks
rkumreo
bxl-forever (2020-08-01 08:56:42+00:00): Good idea.
I think I may have removed the wikidata/wikipedia links from some of those murals in the past—precisely because they were not specific to the POI—I’ll try to find them and add them to the relation.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-08-02 07:05:10+00:00): Thx for the encouragement. The reason for this was https://pietervdvn.github.io/MapComplete/artworks.html where the same image showed up over and over
ndm (2020-07-30 19:25:12+00:00): I've reverted this change:
1). I've surveyed this area
2). the turn restiction would mean no one could ever drive into the road
3). I think you have been looking at a  sign that relates to the Gloucester Road/Shellmor Avenue junction which is the next turning and is mapped correctly.
rkumreo (2020-07-31 12:52:00+00:00): Hi ndm

Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, I have misinterpreted the sign board (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=v586_v-tcj4YrHJzpoG3Ew&focus=photo&lat=51.53892835606964&lng=-2.5664466340118706&z=17&x=0.5024307134434322&y=0.5518552877943146&zoom=1.5570934256055364) as it is placed at the entrance of the Elms grove. Its good to see the community improvising our edits with the local survey. Thanks for the quick correction. Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks
rkumreo
GinaroZ (2020-07-30 00:26:21+00:00): What evidence do you have for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4854371 being a one way road?
rkumreo (2020-07-30 15:49:01+00:00): Hi GinaroZ

Thanks for checking into our edits. I have added the one way based on the (mapillary https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=k21vxzl-WrvNk7-XlFY4nQ&focus=photo&lat=55.97453382877467&lng=-3.2211924341179383&z=17.62269415743672&x=0.4102480810620236&y=0.5836889905228775&zoom=1.9436101792049574). After your suggestions, I have cross verified with the available resources , I presume that the mapillary street side location is misplaced. Please find the changeset (88741844) for the suggested modifications. Please let me know if it requires any more changes. Always happy to learn from the community.

Thanks,
rkumreo
GinaroZ (2020-08-05 22:19:53+00:00): Think you made a mistake here - it's the entirety of Tron Square which is one way: https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/nJmlUQYrxYvegrec-pvVXA - I've fixed it.
rkumreo (2020-08-06 05:13:41+00:00): Hi

Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies , I have misinterpreted the direction of the signboard (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=xfiIl_co7Utt4iMdKCaieA&focus=photo) and added the one way. I will make sure to perform the complete analysis of sign boards before mapping the directions. Thanks for the quick correction. Always happy to learn from the community

Thanks,
rkumreo
andergrin (2020-07-31 10:19:05+00:00): контур будівлі ми малюємо по даху, потім переносимо контур в місце на землі. Також треба вирівнювати кути будинків клавішею Q
aTarom (2023-03-06 18:19:38+00:00): Hola cronoser,
quiero corregir un typo, pero tengo una duda con este nombre
"Centro CulturalLa Hormera"
puede que sea Hornera, con "n"?
"Centro Cultural La Hornera"?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320286885/history

Saludos y gracias por editar
cronoser (2025-03-06 19:15:14+00:00): Hola, efectivamente, es probable que me haya colado. Gracias por avisar.
DressyPear4 (2020-07-30 20:27:04+00:00): Revertido! Vandalismo.
ralley (2020-07-31 20:05:09+00:00): Review as requested: opening hours look good to me.  You can also check with https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88702704
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-01-28 14:11:10+00:00): poxa romario, aqui voce tirou a linha de tipo rua para uma construção, cuidado com as edições, ja reverti a edição
zstadler (2020-09-14 12:27:59+00:00): Hello Tamerdab

In this edit you have added the bicycle barrier at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7768429089

However, this node is not part of any path and it's not clear what is it gating.

Could you put it on the relevant path or delete it if it is not known?

Thanks!
camelCaseNick (2020-08-03 02:13:56+00:00): Hey,

species:wikidata is for entries in Wikidata. You can use species=Tilia americana and since http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q163981 seems to be the species you mean species:wikidata=Q163981 as well.

Are you sure name=Basswood really represents how those indivual trees are called?

CamelCaseNick
Hanif IRM-RV (2020-08-25 01:42:59+00:00): Hi peetha_la!
It's just for your information. I've seen this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236839357). There are many some nodes like
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7742078527, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7759521513,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7759521517, and etc. around it, shifted in your changeset.
But don't worry, I've aligned this node to the appropriate imagery.
Thank you!
gscholz (2020-08-02 10:24:04+00:00): Hi kseltar,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.61820&lat=-25.29738&zoom=14&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Guido
skquinn (2021-02-15 04:39:38+00:00): Hi,

Please do not add shop=yes with no other information. shop=yes no longer renders on the default carto layer and is discouraged; if used anyway, it should have at least a name, address, etc accompanying it to allow for further research.
doublah (2021-02-20 14:37:30+00:00): It doesn't matter if it's not rendered anymore, it's still a useful and not deprecated tag. Objects with it imply they're a shop with incomplete tagging, objects without it imply they're not a shop at all.
trigpoint (2020-07-30 09:54:21+00:00): Hi, the access you have added here has gone a little wrong.

The problem with adding access=no is that it can have unintended consequences, for example here you have excluded pedestrians which is clearly an error.

Also as there are no give way markings at the junction with Groby Road, and it is narrow, suggests that this is probably oneway. The bus stop on the left tends to confirm this.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2020-07-30 09:59:13+00:00): ps I would tend to have gone with motor_vehicle=no bus=yes which allows foot/cyclists and doesn't exclude horses

Cheers Phil
back_spin (2020-07-30 10:12:56+00:00): Hi, trigpoint! Yeah, you right. Changed that. Cheers
abakus_uploader (2020-07-30 22:31:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
JessAk71 (2020-08-07 16:17:25+00:00): Hi iD-W, 
It looks like maybe one of your changesets inadvertently deleted part of columbus ave here (the bridge that crosses over I90), I cant seem to figure out which changeset it was but the road segment is now gone. Can you add the bridge segment back with the original tags?
Jakka (2020-07-31 06:00:09+00:00): Why did you delete building parts ?
One shed OK
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88707431
user_5359 (2020-07-30 06:55:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I can’t find the street of your address nearby.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 10:32:31+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

https://www.osm.org or https://osm.org
常用圖徵(Map Features)表 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
國內網站與協作：
OSM.TW https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
OSMWiki Project Taiwan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Taiwan
Hackpad https://osmtw.hackpad.tw/
Trello https://trello.com/osmtw
GitHub https://github.com/OsmHackTW
與社群交流：
台灣開放街圖 社群組織理事會 信箱 hiboard@openstreetmap.tw
Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
敬祝畫圖愉快！
Kovoschiz (2020-07-30 08:03:09+00:00): Long line removed in https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/88717313
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88708384
Kovoschiz (2020-07-30 08:04:07+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764524952/ and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758633880 construction finished?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88708384