piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-12-21 23:22:46+00:00): In ieder geval weer actueel nu.
Wellicht is er nog een verbinding met het fietspad? 
MVG,
Eggie
bhietsch (2022-01-01 23:50:11+00:00): Hi haprager, maybe I missed it somewhere while reading through the bill, but does it specify that there is going to be any changes to the boundary of White Sands? Looked more like just an upgrade from national monument to park, not an addition or loss of land.
geoaria (2020-04-03 11:03:53+00:00): سلام
دوست عزیز برخی ویرایش های شما باعث خطا در نقشه شده بود که برخی از آنها را حذف کردم. سعی کنید وقتی مسیر را ترسیم می کنید چه راه پیاده و چه ماشین رو به شبکه راهها آنرا متصل کنیدو در غیر این صورت حالت جزیره برای آن مسیر ایجاد می کنید.   سعی کنید از تگ های ایجاد کننده محدودیت برای یک مسیر به درستی استفاده نمایید. وقتی تگ ممنوعیت خدرو برای یک مسیر ایجاد می کنید به مسیر های متصل به آن هم توجه کنید. برای آنها هم می بایست این تگ یا ایجاد شود و یا مسیر دسترسی خودرو به آنها مشخص شود. اگر یک مسیر دارای نگهبانی است ، این مسیر قابل عبور خودرو می باشد باید عبور خصوصی را برای آن فعال نمایید. و ....
Dimacn (2019-12-22 07:08:45+00:00): Замечания: 1. Не надо на территории детского сада наносить детские площадки, подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure%3Dplayground 2. Тегом leisure=stadium отмечают крупные спортивные сооружения с трибунами. Школьные спортивные поля отмечают тегом leisure=pitch , подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure%3Dstadium  3. Не надо делать гигантских размеров детские площадки во дворах прилепляя их к дорогам.
iWowik (2019-12-23 06:17:33+00:00): Про площадки детских садов это какая-то придумка переводчика.
На оригинальной странице наоборот сказано, что площадки могут быть не только в парках и т.п., но и в школах.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground
Dimacn (2019-12-23 06:43:49+00:00): Школа не детский сад. Территории школы чаще всего открытая для всех, в отличие от детских садов (по крайней мере у нас).
iWowik (2019-12-23 09:14:31+00:00): Если доступ ограничен, то чтобы это отразить, есть специально предназначенный тег access.
Насчет "чаще всего" это уже где как.
У меня в округе ночью калитки в школьных заборах закрыты.

Поэтому все объектам на школьной и детсадовской территории не плохо бы иметь access и т.п. теги, ограничивающие факт и/или время посещения.
jmapb (2019-12-24 16:13:50+00:00): Hi happygo -- I think amenity=cafe is actually the best tag we have at the moment for Setugekka and other teahouses. Shop=tea is meant for a store that sells tea leaves to be brewed at home.

There's a proposal underway for amenity=teahouse but it's sort of stalled for now.

(See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtea and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Teahouse )

By the way, thanks for all of your edits and additions in NYC! Jmapb
happygo (2019-12-31 15:43:00+00:00): I guess they also sell tea, but I think the intent of the place is to be a teahouse. thanks! happy mapping:)
ralley (2019-12-21 22:31:02+00:00): Please don't put descriptions in the the name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78721870
Vincent de Phily (2019-12-21 21:41:06+00:00): Clicked too fast, wrong changeset comment.

De-abbreviated church name, removed generic "st mary's church" wikipedia tag, added wikipedia tag to town.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-12-23 23:48:54+00:00): Boa noite Pedro, pode explicar o motivo de ter alterado os limites administrativos legais?
user_5359 (2019-12-22 07:03:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.
Billjh (2019-12-23 13:31:32+00:00): Was attempting to add home address. Unsubscribing.
freebeer (2019-12-24 19:33:03+00:00): your attempt was repaired by Georg, who sent you a form-letter mail describing what you did not quite get right.

further, comparing the map data now, it appears Georg also fixed the imported road to better match reality and put your added address in a probable likely location.

thanks Georg for your improvements, not only here, but also in the thousands of other places; and Bill, do not worry, and do not give up -- it is a simple beginner's mistake from not understanding the details of how everything works, no harm done.

fröhliche Weihnachten wünscht
birra gratis
Paranomix (2019-12-23 23:05:06+00:00): Those are not "meadow" (they are not use for pasture), they are "grass".
Also, they are not as big as you sized them.
Lastly, the school is under construction on the south side, so the southest element you added doesn't even exists at the moment.
Paranomix (2019-12-23 23:09:40+00:00): The previous comment was related to the school changes; now for the bus stop:
This ones are just completely wrong as a roundabout has been built on September.

Please fix your edits.
Mathias_ADAV5962 (2020-09-01 07:59:13+00:00): Bonjour, pour ajouter une école, je vous préconise de garder building = yes ou de faire building = school ; et de créer une zone  encadrant l'ensemble des bâtiment pour l'école,  en utilisant le cadastre pour la dessiner.
szalona_entropia (2019-12-22 18:21:41+00:00): Proszę o uzasadnienie.
szalona_entropia (2019-12-22 18:23:06+00:00): W kwestii Skierniewic to polecam się zapoznać z artykułem 19 ustęp 5 ustawy o drogach publicznych
pio2_122 (2019-12-29 11:22:13+00:00): W kwestii Skierniewic, to podany artykuł określa tylko winowajcę braku oznakowania na terenie miasta...

W związku z tym, stosując się do zasad OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Mapuj.2C_co_jest_na_ziemi i https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki#Weryfikowalno.C5.9B.C4.87)
nie można tagować tego odcinka drogi ref'em DW, ponieważ nie jest on oznaczony poprawnie w terenie.
maraf24 (2020-01-01 22:26:56+00:00): Wycofałem.
Stok_2 (2020-01-01 22:41:37+00:00): Zobacz https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/artyku%C5%82y/2019:12:17:Kowalewo_Opactwo-Wie%C5%9B
PerplexingPenguins (2019-12-22 20:49:00+00:00): It's probably worth adding an `access:conditional` tag to express that
Leo Slager (2019-12-22 00:42:05+00:00): Na 5 jaar weer een bijdrage en nooit een welkomst bericht gehad.
Ik zal het je alsnog toesturen.
Misschien kun je dan in de wiki eens opzoeken hoe je dit soort wegen en fietspaden moet taggen.
Als je nog eens naar de Groenewoudsedijk kijkt dan zie je hoe ik het gedaan heb.
kapazao (2019-12-22 14:51:26+00:00): Hola Jotaele_, el año pasado llegamos a un acuerdo en la lista de correo https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-es/2018-August/016258.html sobre el etiquetado del Metro de Granada y quedamos en etiquetarlo como tram.
Te pediría que reviertas estos cambios que has realizado recientemente en la línea y si no sabes hacerlo ya lo hago yo.
Si tienes alguna duda o no sabes cómo revertir no dudes en consultar.
Un saludo
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78723285
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 11:41:14+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86044790
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 11:41:11+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86044790
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 11:41:08+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86044790
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 11:41:05+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86044790
mtbboy1993 (2020-04-07 18:55:27+00:00): hvorfor endret du det til sykkelvei? det er lov å gå der også. er altså ikke kun sykkelvei men gang og sykkelvei, som den var før du endret den. jeg bor i Askim, den er skiltet som gang og sykkel vei, ikke sykkelvei.
mapman44 (2019-12-23 05:07:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Please provide some description of your edits so we know what you are trying to accomplish. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78723525
unclemac (2019-12-22 13:09:39+00:00): ok
agumore (2019-12-22 08:54:42+00:00): Perfecto!
agumore (2019-12-22 08:53:41+00:00): ok
pitscheplatsch (2019-12-25 21:17:44+00:00): Hi Wayne Little,

please don't add test data to the live OSM Server.
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
agumore (2019-12-22 08:54:11+00:00): Ok
rskedgell (2019-12-22 13:43:57+00:00): That's fine, although the access tags you have added aren't really necessary, they are unlikely to confuse routing software or renderers. However access=yes ("All" in iD), means wide open to all transport modes.

For a footway/pavement/sidewalk in the UK (highway=footway +  footway=sidewalk), the default assumed by routers and in law (s. 72 Highway Act 1835 https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Will4/5-6/50/section/72 ) is:
  foot=yes
+ bicycle=no
+ motor_vehicle=no
+ horse=no
(for the purposes of the 1835 act, both a bicycle and a motor vehicle are a "carriage").

It's also worth looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#United_Kingdom for the default access restrictions on different types of highway=*

 I know the iD editor presents all of these as options in the "Allowed Access" section, but they only need to be completed where access is other than the default. A footway might have more restrictive access permissions for foot=* e.g. permissive, customers, or private. 

The unnecessary tags may well get changed sooner or later, not least because quality assurance tools like Osmose and some editing software will report highway=* + access=yes and highway=footway + foot=yes as tagging issues.
user_9517839 (2019-12-22 19:00:59+00:00): Ok I have read through your message and will understand if anything is changed I know why.

Thank you for explaining it all to me.
user_5359 (2019-12-22 06:52:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! the tag building:levels=0 means that the building has no height above ground level. But I see a building on the aerial image. See https://www.osm.org/way/757736896, https://www.osm.org/way/757736897
AndriesWijma (2020-05-31 23:46:48+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86024385
FvGordon (2019-12-23 11:30:24+00:00): The line across the golf course was not a road but the boundary between Vimont and Duvernay, which I have repaired.
Mr_Schrodinger35 (2019-12-23 11:35:34+00:00): Oops i'm truly sorry! Thank you for the heads up and repairing my mistake! I'll know for next time! I didn't expect a boundary to cut across a golf course!
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 12:21:33+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86046482
AndriesWijma (2020-06-01 12:22:43+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86046145
AndriesWijma (2020-05-31 23:46:46+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86024385
geri-oc (2020-07-09 09:00:11+00:00): Beachte bitte:
Meßtischblätter sind nicht als Vorlage genehmgt.
Deine Korrekturen solltest du auch prüfen, Wasserwege schneiden Wege.
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=101&error=111297269&zoom=16&lat=50.90997&lon=13.79046&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C20%2C60%2C300&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0
sdicke (2020-06-20 19:34:26+00:00): Ich frage mich bei way/90179329 für für das QQ bei addr:district steht. Ist das unabsichtlich da hin geraten?
black_bike (2020-06-20 21:58:25+00:00): Ich wars nicht. Hat 2017 ein anderer Mapper gesetzt. War wohl Tippfehler. Das gibt es sonst in Bochum nicht. Hatte es übernommen, als ich das Büro vom Umrisss getrennt hatte und es war dann auch auf dem neuen Node für das Büro. :-(
Ich habe es jetzt repariert, das heißt gelöscht.
Arun Madhavan (2019-12-22 07:28:28+00:00): You may draw temple as area; also map the pond near it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78727477
pitscheplatsch (2019-12-25 10:46:56+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78843778
Leo Slager (2019-12-23 11:35:16+00:00): Dag GPX,

Dan zou ik dat ook gewoon taggen met
moped=no
mofa=no
Anders blijft het gewoon routeren.
4004 (2019-12-25 12:36:09+00:00): судя по огражедению, там не мусор а контейнеры для переработки и смешанных отходов?
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=UupiuV7cY1pJYTouEDQnaQ&focus=photo&lat=53.6496548&lng=23.845376599999998&z=17&x=0.3661097454474494&y=0.5400946662045826&zoom=2.937442841991503
4004 (2019-12-25 14:05:21+00:00): уже есть, обновите карты или поставьте османд
AndriesWijma (2020-05-31 23:46:43+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86024385
mariotomo (2019-12-22 16:34:21+00:00): hola y gracias.
te sugiero sólo: podrías considerar de subir los datos agrupando por tipología?  en este caso, tienes muchos conjuntos de cambios con no más un edificio, todos en la misma zona, me parece más comprensible para quien revisa el trabajo, si los juntaras.
para la próxima pues.
gracias, ciao.
user_5359 (2019-12-22 09:54:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name and start_name, have little sense. See https://www.osm.org/way/757783496, https://www.osm.org/way/665169010
Thomas8122 (2019-12-23 18:26:23+00:00): und was ist jetzt der Unterschied zum mechanischen Edit?
kjon (2020-01-01 15:12:16+00:00): Wenn ich mir die entsprechende wiki Seite zum mechanical editing anschaue, sehe ich da durchaus Unterschiede, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_edits

Habe ich Fehler hinterlassen oder bestehendes Tagging verschlechtert?
Thomas8122 (2020-01-01 22:38:36+00:00): die Frage ist: hast du alle POI auf Vorhandensein geprüft, weil jetzt haben sie einen aktuellen Zeitstempel der es (fast) unmöglich macht, nach lange nicht mehr angefassten POI zu suchen (könnten ja evtl. weg sein)
kjon (2020-01-02 11:47:31+00:00): Hallo Thomas, natürlich habe ich nicht alle POI auf Vorhandensein überprüft. Das war wohl eher eine rhetorische Frage, auf die Du auch gerne verzichten darfst. Viele (nicht alle) der korrigierten POI sind auf Luftbildern erkennbar (Brücke, Denkmäler, Wege) so dass ich davon ausgehe, dass diese noch vorhanden sind. Das ist bei Geschäften nicht möglich, hier vertraue ich den vorhandenen Daten. Und wenn diese falsch sind, werden sie meiner Meinung nach durch Ergänzungen nicht falscher, sondern fallen bestenfalls sogar eher ins Auge und werden entsprechend korrigiert. LG kjon
MikeN (2019-12-22 12:54:38+00:00): Please add a better description of changes.  
Save more often before moving to a new area so that one changeset doesn't cover half the state.   What is your source for US800?
MikeN (2019-12-22 12:55:25+00:00): Why was Outback deleted and redrawn?
Thymedar (2019-12-22 10:02:13+00:00): ดี
mavl (2019-12-30 15:17:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79019169 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3355].
mavl (2019-12-30 15:17:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79019169 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3355].
laurent-38 (2019-12-23 11:04:15+00:00): Bonjour Revali_380,

j’ai supprimé le point « École Maternelle » car il faisait doublon avec l’école primaire (élémentaire+maternelle) à proximité.
cf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78769105

Cordialement
~~
laurent
mavl (2019-12-30 15:17:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79019169 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3355].
trigpoint (2020-12-11 10:30:41+00:00): Reverted in changeset 95674415
ChehrehBargi (2020-06-12 09:55:59+00:00): تغییر در مرز شهرستان
schoka (2020-01-23 17:25:24+00:00): Den Weg neben der Bäckerei solltest du noch mit der nahegelegenen Kreuzung verbinden, dann kann ein Navi den Weg auch vorschlagen. Reine Gehwege an der Strasse, würde ich aber gar nicht einzeichnen; das kann man über den "erlaubten Zugang" der Straße regeln.
opendcc (2019-12-22 15:46:45+00:00): Hallo,

laß das besser auf residential stehen, Anlieger dürfen da rein. schoka hatte die Tags schon korrekt gesetzt.

Servus
SHARCRASH (2019-12-22 10:58:27+00:00): + new elements
DaveF (2020-06-09 11:27:57+00:00): Hi
Why have you tag it as both bridge & tunnel? These are clearly in confliction.
If the railway passes above the water line it is still a bridge, even if it's covered.
Lyon-St-Clair (2020-06-09 11:29:13+00:00): The metro line passes in the structure of the bridge under the road.
DaveF (2020-06-09 11:45:58+00:00): I know. As I indicated in my first post. That doesn't make it a tunnel. It is still a bridge structure

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
or
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dcovered
iWowik (2020-01-31 06:57:56+00:00): Рад вас приветствовать в проекте, я заметил, что вы рисуете домики и ставите им адреса.

Скажите пожалуйста, где вы берете адреса для домиков?
Обычно их сложно найти.
eggie (2019-12-22 12:29:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review.. Lijkt me prima zo.. één kleinigheidje..geen spaties in een telefoonnummer. 
MVG,
Eggie
Remco Landegge (2019-12-22 12:46:25+00:00): Dank voor de review en tip
ralley (2019-12-22 17:51:44+00:00): Are you sure these are paths for non-motorised vehicles? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath) From the aerial imagery they appear to be driveways (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78732253
GinaroZ (2019-12-22 12:20:49+00:00): What is your source for this change?
Greyseal18 (2019-12-22 13:32:25+00:00): https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=West_End_Junction
pio2_122 (2019-12-22 12:00:51+00:00): Brak źródła - wycofane.
Klasyfikacja dróg w OSM nie jest kopią klasyfikacji urzędowej.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78732484
Bartek93ZGL (2019-12-22 12:19:22+00:00): Przy podnoszeniu klasyfikacji dróg w OSM na "trzeciorzędną" nie opieram się klasyfikacją urzędową dróg. W powiecie goleniowskim są drogi powiatowe, gruntowe, których nie podnoszę do tak wysokiej klasyfikacji. Jednak drogi, które mają nawierzchnie asfaltową, 6-7m szerokości i stanowią uzupełnienie dróg drugorzędnych podnoszę im klasyfikacje zgodnie z zasadami. Robiłem tak w Gminie Goleniów i zostało to zaakceptowane po dyskusji.
Bartek93ZGL (2019-12-22 12:20:04+00:00): źródła nie wskaże przy tym, bo znam je z własnej obserwacji z terenu.
pio2_122 (2019-12-22 12:25:34+00:00): Znów problemem był opis do zestawu zmian, który wprowadził mnie w błąd...
Mam wielką prośbę: używaj bardziej konkretnych i szczegółowych opisów :) Dzięki temu unikniemy takich sytuacji.
W tym przypadku (jeśli chcesz) mogę przywrócić ten zestaw.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78732484
Bartek93ZGL (2019-12-22 12:47:03+00:00): Ok, poproszę o przywrócenie zmian. Postaram się podawać pełniejsze i dokładniejsze opisy.
pio2_122 (2019-12-22 13:01:05+00:00): Zrobione.
Tomas Straupis (2020-01-25 07:08:42+00:00): Is there really an actual road sign with a speed limit of 8 (eight)?
4004 (2020-01-26 20:46:06+00:00): unless the maxspeed sign convention is different in Lithuania, you can see for yourself here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=FDccAg1XG_s3MXCLk40gW9&focus=photo&lat=54.718461382840566&lng=25.744840815960643&z=17&x=0.42557308182037423&y=0.4470750933819394&zoom=2.486737400530504
Tomas Straupis (2020-01-26 21:43:40+00:00): Very interesting, thank you for information! Will add 8 as a valid maxspeed value in our validator.
eggie (2019-12-22 13:08:17+00:00): Ivm met je vraag.. 
Bij Joyce is dus correct bijgevoegd aan de bestaande adresnode.. Alleen de spaties nog weghalen in het telefoonnummer.
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-22 13:02:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
JezCrow (2019-12-24 20:43:21+00:00): Hi map_man_06, welcome to OSM! You're the second new editor of Ingleby Barwick this month and it's great to see this area getting attention.
You requested a review - can I point out the 'square' function - shortcut 'Q' - which causes the corners of a selected object to be right-angles.
Happy mapping, Jez.
Tomas Straupis (2019-12-22 15:51:42+00:00): Kas čia turėjo būti? :-) Negali būti pelkės, kaip taško, ir dar su adresu.
Audisx (2019-12-22 17:11:55+00:00): Nėjo kažko nuimti to taško. Ten lidl nebestatys 👍
Tomas Straupis (2019-12-22 17:52:54+00:00): Supratau. Ištryniau tašką. Ačiū už info.
Audisx (2019-12-22 18:31:00+00:00): Ačiū 👍
eggie (2019-12-23 07:53:46+00:00): Oke mapgein.. Ziet er netjes uit. Houd je er wel rekening mee dat je de afslagen bij de zijstraten intekent. Nu zit je op het fietspad "gevangen" en kun je nergens afslaan. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-12-22 12:56:53+00:00): De  Brouwershof kun je als gebouwcomplex laten importeren via het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
Doe je dat zelf. Inlog identiek aan osm account.. met wat vertraging wegens accountcheck.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
MVG,
Eggie
multimodaal (2019-12-22 13:07:15+00:00): Herstel omschrijving, excuus, moet zijn: 
-Naam Smitsbos toegevoegd
-Source:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1730355
ted3sco (2019-12-23 20:24:06+00:00): Strazile au denumirea completa. Ex: Strada Principală, Calea Craiovei, Aleea X, Bulevardul Y. Ia exemplu de la alte localitati daca cunosti zona asta si vrei s-o completezi. Vezi si wiki pentru alte sfaturi.
HubMiner (2023-04-04 04:33:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322301742/history

Hello, the second rule in the opening_hours is confusing, could you review.
Jordi MF (2019-12-23 17:24:26+00:00): Hola,

He vist que has afegit un landuse=residential per a fer referència on estan situats els masos on antigament es vivia. Tingues en compte que l'etiqueta landuse=residential (i l'especificació de rural) només s'utilitza en aquels nuclis actualment habitats o on l'ús del sòl està clarament definit com a residencial. Caldria corregir-ho. Gràcies.
goterris (2019-12-23 20:40:15+00:00): No he trobat cap ús més adient (de fet he mirat de copiar-lo de com s'havia classificat un mas semblant i proper).
Quin seria l'ús més correcte per a un conjunt de masos en ruïna? O només deixe constància dels edificis? que per cert tampoc deixen diferenciar els qui estan drets o en runes com són la majoria de masos en alguns llocs.
Gràcies per les respostes.
Claudius Henrichs (2019-12-30 18:48:08+00:00): Hi Halbtax,
Was there a specific reason that I miss out on why you removed the Leman Express train stop position from the stop area relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9003408 ? I can see that one could separate the stop areas for train infrastructure and bus, but I am not sure if that is what you were aiming at.
Halbtax (2019-12-31 14:59:34+00:00): Hi  Claudius Henrichs
When I tried to map the station with more detail, I also observed how the trains stop here. The trains do not stop on an exact position but over a range of about 160m. Since the platform and station are already mapped in detail, the arbitrary indication of a chosen stop position seems to me more misleading than useful.