piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-01-15 18:29:15+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Gh0stz0x (2018-01-16 21:35:08+00:00): Benvenuto su OpenStreetMap.
Descrivi quello che fai nel changeset, non le tue opinioni sul locale. Grazie.
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-15 18:38:04+00:00): HELLO!? Could please stop your script. This changeset contains the version 215(!) of the Best Electronics POI.
abakus_uploader (2018-01-15 23:31:02+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897 - tam również proszę zadawać ewentualne pytania.
Pozdrawiamy!
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-15 18:44:50+00:00): Stop your script!
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-15 18:42:00+00:00): shahriar, please stop your script immediately! You changed (only) the location of this POI more than 200 times within the last 8 hours.
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-15 18:45:27+00:00): Stop your script!
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-15 19:50:35+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55471808
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-15 19:50:56+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55471923
pitscheplatsch (2018-01-15 18:45:58+00:00): Stop your script!
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-15 19:51:13+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55472146
user_177389 (2018-01-15 19:01:49+00:00): addr:* tags removed (especially addr:street and addr:housenumber can not include a bigger area with different addresses)
PT-53 (2018-01-15 19:41:43+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
mich würde interessieren, warum dieses Straßenstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553332308#map=19/48.24060/9.61146 abgetrennt und diesen Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457644868/history von path auf footway (mit bicycle=yes) geändert hast.
Grüße
rainerU (2018-01-15 22:00:31+00:00): Die Bergstraße ist ab dem Punkt, wo ich sie aufgetrennt habe, in Richtung Westen 30er-Zone.

Der Fußweg am Ortseingang ist mit Zeichen 239 (Fußweg) versehen. Aus meiner Sicht ist highway=footway somit das richtige Tag. Nur ortsauswärts ist das Zusatzschild "Radfahrer frei" angebracht. Der Weg ist also für Radfahrer nicht benutzungspflichtig, aber ortsauswärts befahrbar. Daher bicycle=yes und oneway:bicycle=yes. Diese besondere Regelung wird auch durch ein grün-weißes Schild am östlichen Ende des Wegs bestätigt, mit dem Radfahrer aus Richtung Munderkingen auf die Fahrbahn geführt werden. Vielleicht könnte man das auch mit highway=Pathologie und foot=désignation taggen, Das ändert aber nichts am Ergebnis.

Der Vollständigkeit halber müsste man noch die Relationen, die über diesen Weg laufen, an dieser Stelle richtungsabhängig  aufsplitten.

Ich habe heute die Bilder hierzu auf  Mapillary hoch geladen.Es kann u.U. etwas dauern bis diese öffentlich sichtbar sind.
PT-53 (2018-01-16 09:55:08+00:00): Die Bergstraße ist ab dem Punkt, wo ich sie aufgetrennt habe, in Richtung Westen 30er-Zone. >> Das kurze Straßenstück ist aber ebenfals als 30er-Zone eingetragen.
Grüße
rainerU (2018-01-16 10:04:16+00:00): Ok, das ist natürlich nicht richtig. Korrigiert.
eggie (2018-01-15 21:42:19+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
gscholz (2018-12-23 08:18:07+00:00): Hola,
your edits in tihs region have left over douzens of OSM errors regarding selfintersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-48.56724&lat=-17.68866&zoom=11&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can your please fix this?
Saludos
Guido
Felipe Alves (2018-01-16 15:24:28+00:00): Oi, Diego. Tudo bem?
Vi que nesta edição, você deletou o estacionamento anterior, para criar este novo. Entendo que o contorno possa até ser bem diferente, mas por questões de guardar melhor o histórico dos objetos, é recomendável que não se apague para criação de novos, a não ser que seja mesmo necessário, ok?
Fico a disposição para quaisquer dúvidas ou ajuda que possa precisar.
Caso tenha interesse em entrar no grupo do Telegram de mapeadores do CE, basta acessar o link: https://t.me/osmce
Abs
Diego Mendes (2018-01-16 16:17:11+00:00): Opa @Felipe, obrigado pelas dicas... nesse caso, como eu faço pra ajustar o formato do existente (adicionar um novo vertice) ?
Felipe Alves (2018-01-16 17:10:42+00:00): Para adicionar mais vértices, basta colocar o cursor no meio da linha, e clicar 2x quando aparecer o sinal de +. Para eliminar, basta selecionar somente o ponto e deletar. Também pode arrastar a seleção completa, dividir, grudar/desgrudar pontos (tem essas opções com o botão direito do mouse).
mavl (2018-12-25 00:07:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:51:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:44:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-16 03:57:03+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55472988
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-01-15 19:17:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
lenny32 (2018-01-18 19:18:23+00:00): Bonjour,
Le bâtiment n'est pas encore sur le cadastre, mais il correspond plus à l'imagerie satellite que le précédent tracé.
Par contre la source n'est plus bonne.
Bonne contribution
cordialement
Leni
mavl (2018-12-25 00:39:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:51:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-16 03:57:27+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55473263
geri-oc (2018-04-13 17:42:13+00:00): Die Angabe der Namen an einzelnen Wegen ist falsch, da der Name in der Relation "Hauptstraße" enthalten ist.
Und an einem "Fußweg" den Namen der Straße zu wiederholen ist m.E. falsch. Oder ist es eine Fehlbedienung oder Fehler in StreetComplete?
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:38:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:09:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:08:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:03:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:12:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:43:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:12:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-16 03:58:11+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55473531
4004 (2019-10-07 17:02:17+00:00): Добрый вечер,
вы в курсе, что все ваши правки с источником "кадастр" подлежат удалению? и на жалко вам труда своего и чужого?
5m4u9 (2018-01-16 14:48:41+00:00): gracias por mejorar, las plazas... inicialmente pense como areas verdes genericas pero siempre es mjor poner algo mas especifico
Steube (2020-06-09 18:45:46+00:00): Hier wurden jede Menge Parkplätze eingetragen. Davon sind allerdings einige nicht erreichbar, da sie nicht mit dem Straßennetz verbunden sind. Darüber hinaus wäre zu prüfen, ob es sich um öffentliche oder private Stellplätze handelt. Diese hier sind alle als öffentlich nutzbare Stellplätze gekennzeichnet. Ist das richtig?
mavl (2018-12-25 00:22:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:27:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:47:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:29:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Jason Harrison (2018-01-15 22:38:32+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55473753
PT-53 (2018-01-16 10:49:36+00:00): Hallo geo-ranger,
Du hast mehrere Spielgeräte eingezeichnet und mit Namen versehen, wie z.B. Traktor-Schwingreifen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5341441944).
Traktor-Schwingreifen (und auch die anderen Bezeichnungen) ist / sind keine Eigennamen, sondern Beschreibungen. Diese gehören nicht in den name-Tag. Sie können als description (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description) eingetragen werden.
Änderst Du das bitte. Danke.
Grüße
geo-ranger (2018-02-11 17:47:05+00:00): Hallo, die Spielplätze sind Teil des Schaukelweges und sind einzeln benannt unter http://www.sigmaringen.de/de/Familie-Bildung-Demografie/Kinder-Familien/Schaukelweg/.
Falls das trotzdem nicht gewünscht ist sie so zu benennen, könnte der Name auch in description geändert werden.
Grüße
PT-53 (2018-02-11 18:25:38+00:00): Ja, bitte mache das.
Danke
Jason Harrison (2018-01-15 22:38:24+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55473942
santamariense (2018-02-17 19:48:06+00:00): Não delete objetos sem saber o que é. Um ponto com o nome "Industrial" que deletastes era um marcado de nome de bairro
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55474009
RicoElectrico (2018-01-16 08:47:46+00:00): Cześć. Witaj w OSM! Klasyfikacja drogi którą użyłeś jest do poprawy. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553340789

highway=trunk_link to zjazd z drogi ekspresowej!

Tak samo, ja bym użył po prostu highway=residential jako dojazdu do Zgłobickiej 41A, ew. dodał jaka jest nawierzchnia. highway=track to droga polna, duża część nawigacji ze zrozumiałych powodów je omija.

Do przeczytania: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:highway?uselang=pl

W każdym razie: Dzięki za to, że chcesz razem z nami ulepszać mapę. Jeśli masz pytania, śmiało pisz do mnie albo na polskim forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-16 08:38:24+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM! I'm one of the OSM Ireland old hands. I notice you requested a review of this, so let's have a look.

This is mostly pretty good. Everyone in the world can see things from aerial imagery (we call it armchair mapping), but there are things you can't see from aerial imagery, and paths like you've added are one of them. For those things we *need* people on the ground mapping things. 🙂 So thanks for adding things like that! 👍 You've added more than the bare minimum, with the surface & rating.

*However*, there is 2 little things. (a) You've set the name to "forest walk" and (b) connected the forest o the N22.

(a) "name" in OSM can be weird. It can often be tempting to add the description of a thing as the name.  But if it's just a description, then we don't put that in for the name. It's OK to just leave the name blank. We can see that it's a path, and that it's inside a forest.

(b) this is a little tricker, and probably just an honest mistake due to how the iD editor does things, but you'd attached the forest to the N22 at the point where the path goes from the road. Not a big mistake.
R0bst3r (2018-01-16 07:08:31+00:00): Hallo maglat,
willkommen bei OSM und vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag.
Da es diesen Ort wirklich gibt finde ich deine Erfassungen gut, ansonsten bitte folgendes lesen: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/

Falls du Interesse hast weiter sinnvoll beizutragen empfehle ich learnosm.org und unser wiki.osm.org.

Viele Grüße
R0bst3r (2018-01-16 07:12:18+00:00): Hallo nochmals,
ich habe den Park zu einer Grasfläche gemacht. Die Kriterien unter wiki.osm.org für einen Park sind hier nicht erfüllt.
Für den Namen bitte nur Eigennamen angeben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Viele Grüße
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-16 03:58:36+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55474563
zstadler (2018-02-12 10:57:02+00:00): Hello Sivan00,
.
Can you elaborate of the reasons for modifying the boundary of the (Relation 7421142). 
Was it announced by the minister of interior affairs?
sivan00 (2018-02-12 12:15:57+00:00): This change represents the actual situation on the ground.
zstadler (2018-02-12 12:52:10+00:00): In what sense is the boundary of the Rosh HaNikra Nature Reserve "on the ground"?
sivan00 (2018-02-12 12:57:18+00:00): I'm not sure what you mean. Please point me to the exact coordinates of the change.
sivan00 (2018-02-12 12:58:48+00:00): I do not recall ever changing this reserve.
zstadler (2018-02-12 13:24:50+00:00): You have moved https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3934393291
sivan00 (2018-02-12 13:29:38+00:00): I honestly do not recall this specific change (and I'm not sure what ecactly was changed). If you believe it is wrong, you can change it back.
zstadler (2018-02-12 14:37:28+00:00): I would appreciate it, and your future care not to change Nature Reserve's boundaries.
zstadler (2018-02-15 08:16:22+00:00): The change in Rosh HaNikra Nature Reserve boundary was reverted in changeset #56376441
Jason Harrison (2018-01-15 22:38:14+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55474877
Hjart (2018-01-15 20:42:02+00:00): Når vi ændrer tags så mange steder, er det muligt vi lige skal annoncere planen på postlisten først.
Lytter1 (2018-01-15 22:14:43+00:00): Nok en klog ide, så det gør jeg lige.
Hjart (2018-01-15 22:32:43+00:00): Du er et super eksempel for os andre :-)
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-16 03:59:06+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55474896
Pepilepioux (2018-01-16 07:31:13+00:00): Bonjour,
Et bienvenue dans la famille des contributeurs !
Ça  a l'air bien, tout ça. Sinon que ici (https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=44.71696&mlon=5.04308&zoom=18) le chemin passe un peu dans l'eau.
Alors est-ce que la limite de la rivière (riverbank) représente le niveau le plus haut atteint exceptionnellement ? Ce qui fait que le chemin serait impratiquable quelques jours par an ?
Ou cette limite de la rivière a-t-elle été tracée un peu à la louche ? Ce que semble indiquer la photo aérienne.
Dans ce cas il conviendrait de rectifier ce "riverbank".

Bonne contribution, merci