piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2017-07-27 09:16:51+00:00): ну и зачем вы это восстановили? Вредничание? Ведь нормальный тег не поставили - что вы там имели в виду.
eggie (2017-07-26 13:48:04+00:00): Gebouwen dragen niet de adressen.. Die horen op de BAG adresnodes. Wat is de reden dit te veanderen?
Gebouwen en adresnodes zijn direct geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG.
Graag reactie
eggie (2017-07-26 13:54:33+00:00): De adresnode zonder verdere tags staat nog op het gebouw. Graag de adresgegevens nr2 overzetten naar de adresnode. Doet u dit zelf?
eggie (2017-07-26 18:00:53+00:00): Via PB contact gehad. Adresgegevens van gebouw gehaald. ofice=yes toegevoegd en website http://vkr-debilt.nl/index.php
Een terugmelding naar de BAG zou gewenst zijn. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=maartensdijk&resultOffset=0&objectId=2936&geometry.x=140690.74406152&geometry.y=462939.45378467&zoomlevel=4&detailsObjectId=2936
eggie (2017-07-26 18:05:51+00:00): Phone 06-845 91 231 toegevoegd
DaveF (2017-07-26 13:33:00+00:00): Hi
A detailed household depot already exists. If public can't enter the bit you've just mapped would it better as a separate polygon? Is it for commercial companies? 

Your addition also doubles up landuse=industrial.
uberchump (2017-08-01 13:27:07+00:00): Hi Dave - would take your lead - I work for the company that operates the site and I'm trying to address two audiences - technically it's a single site with partitioned access for public / suppliers and staff - the additional area is not a commercial as such but where service and staff vehicles access - the area defined in the original polygon was the public access only - we want to be able to direct trucks to the correct part of the depot - happy to add second polygon if that clarifies - thanks.
mavl (2017-07-26 16:44:44+00:00): Hello. You use the same changeset comment. Please, use good changeset comments.
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments]
mavl (2017-07-26 16:49:28+00:00): Hello. Please, give me one good reason why the tag "name:en" of a district contains the name of region ("Belozersky District, Kurgan Oblast")?
Upendrakarukonda (2017-07-27 06:57:07+00:00): Hi  Eduardo_Delgad0,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Observed that you deleted many POIs and useful data in this region. I reverted and brought back the data. May I know the reason behind this deletion?

Regards,

Upendra.
marc__marc (2022-09-28 21:10:27+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4994889059
it's a bench ?
Regards,
Marc
nurdafur (2022-09-29 06:00:33+00:00): Hi Marc
Uff, it is a long time ago.
From the way I do my notes while traveling, it must be a bench, yes. Dono why the main-tag is missing.
Regards, Urs
marc__marc (2022-09-29 07:01:19+00:00): are you willing to add the main tag or I do it ?
Regards,
Marc
nurdafur (2022-09-29 08:13:47+00:00): Would be nice, when you do it. I am just on the run.
Thanks and regards
Urs
scai (2017-07-26 16:17:44+00:00): Is this really a bar? There is already a shop "Hopfenkult" next to this POI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2726488740
literan (2017-07-27 10:20:34+00:00): здравствуйте! пересекающиеся дороги, тропы всегда должны иметь общую точку, а не просто лежать друг на друге (иначе навигаторы не смогут по ним строить маршруты). Я здесь исправил, но, пожалуйста, в дальнейшем следите за этим - это очень важно
Constable (2017-07-26 19:52:00+00:00): User answered, see changeset 50554290
firefoxinspace (2017-08-29 09:46:03+00:00): Die Straße ist nicht kreuzungsfrei von Norden kommend bis einschließlich der T-Kreuzung zur Konrad-Adenauer-Straße. Ab dann jedoch schon.
VictorIE (2017-08-27 16:10:58+00:00): The connection between the N52 and Main Street seems to be missing. Has the layout of Emmet Square changed?
Jord5792 (2017-08-29 10:44:50+00:00): Yes it has changed. They removed the straight connection between N52 and Main street, creating a one way road from Green St./The Green (R439) to MainSt. in front of the Garda Station and a two way from N52 to MainSt. in front of Doolys Hotel. A pedestrian area was made around the statue there.
eggie (2017-07-26 18:13:56+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
oormilavinod (2017-07-27 05:40:13+00:00): hey Luis Jorge Santos Pinho, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-03 11:05:42+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2631095007/history has shop = it that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=it ? Is it computer repair shop? Office of an IT company (office=company) ? Place selling computers? Something else??
ViriatoLusitano (2017-07-26 20:44:41+00:00): Podias-me ensinar o teu método de mapear as áreas húmidas? Eu tinha ideias de melhorar um pouco o mapa pelas zona da ria de Aveiro e reparo que já andas-te por lá. :) Contudo nessa não utilizas-te a tag para wetlands mas na ria formosa usas, qual é a diferença?
topolusitania (2017-07-28 15:57:52+00:00): Aveiro foi desenhada há mais tempo. e como a linha de costa não penetra pela ria, foram desenhadas as diversas ilhas sobre um fundo Riverbank. Não usámos relações complexas para não perder "o fio à meada" No mapa ao lado podes ver o que a existencia da coast Line implica no desenho - à esquerda se queremos "terra devemos desenhar islets com a tag coast line. À direita como a coast line passa ao lado, foi desenhar os braços da ria e as "wetland"
Em Aveiro estão desenhadas algumas wetland, mas de facto são piucas... :-(
ViriatoLusitano (2017-07-28 16:39:06+00:00): Obrigado pelo esclarecimento.
DaveF (2017-07-26 16:37:25+00:00): Hi
There's already a John Wood House. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89231070

Is that the block of the student accommodation?
ENZiRThE (2017-07-26 17:15:36+00:00): Hello, yes it's the accommodation I'm staying at the moment, my apology if I've duplicated it.
DaveF (2017-07-26 18:45:18+00:00): Excellent. Could you correct it please.
ENZiRThE (2017-07-26 21:23:14+00:00): Hello I Will correct it, please describe how.
 I have logged into my account but cannot see how to do it.
I think I will refrain from adding further POI as its beyond my ability at present.
DaveF (2017-07-28 15:08:39+00:00): I'm unsure if OsmAnd has the ability to amend polygons. Hve a lok hear for ones that do: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editors
 
Please don't stop adding nodes to OSM, but do a search in OsmAnd to see if the entity already exists.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:39:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310008390/history has access:motor_vehicle that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using motor_vehicle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle ) be fitting at least equally well?
eggie (2017-07-26 18:19:09+00:00): Oke... goed bezig!
geow (2017-07-26 19:34:26+00:00): Hallo e-quadrat, du hast hier und in einem weiteren Änderungssatz http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50592716

Wege gelöscht, weil sie angeblich nicht existieren. Kannst du das etwas näher erläutern? 

Ich frage, weil in einem anderen Änderungssatz davon die Rede ist, dass dass die Polizei hier Mountainbiker einsammelt, die verbotenerweise den Weg benutzen, siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50315181

Daher wären wir dir für ein paar Erläuterungen dankbar, zumal du dich extra für die Löschung als neuer Nutzer angemeldet hast.

Danke
geow
e-quadrat (2017-07-28 17:49:48+00:00): Hallo,
Ich beziehe mich auch auf den Diskussionsbeitrag https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59158 und kenne den Inhalt und auch die Hintergründe. So wie Frederik sagt, er möchte die Ortskundigen bzw. Waldeigentümer bitten die Karte in OSM vollständig und richtig darstellen und dem OSM-Projekt helfen ein korrektes und vollständiges Abbild des Wegenetzes zu etablieren. Ich finde gefallen daran und möchte nun gerne aktiv mithelfen die Unklarheiten zu beseitigen und das korrekte Wegenetz in diesem Bereich zu zeichnen.

Zum gelöschten Weg selbst: Die in OSM als Weg dargestellte Linie ist eine historische Durchforstungslinie welche innerhalb forstwirtschafticher Aktivitäten einmal (historisch) entstand ist. Aktuell (seit ca. 5 Jahren) findet intensive und forstwirtschaftlich gewollte Verjüngung auf dieser Linie statt. Die Tatsache, dass diese Linie bei OSM als "Weg" markiert und nicht zuletzt bis vor kurzen auch "nicht explizit für Radfahrer gesperrt" markiert war, führte in jüngster Zeit zu Irritationen: Fahrradfaher nutzten den scheinbaren Weg und störten den Jungwuchs der Bäume. Nicht zuletzt führte dies zu Misstimmungen bei dem Waldeigentümer. Ich stehe mit dem Waldeigentümer im intensiven Kontakt. Kenne den Ort und möchte nun sukzessive das Wegenetz in eine richtige Darstellung bringen.
Viele Grüße und auf gute Zusammenarbeit,
e-quadrat (Eckart Schulze)
geow (2017-07-28 19:13:45+00:00): Hallo Eckart, vielen Dank für deine Erläuterungen, jetzt wird mir einiges klarer. :-)

Dann herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! 

Wenn du noch Tipps zum Einstieg brauchst, schau mal auf diese Seiten:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/help
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap
http://learnosm.org/de/
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn du Spaß an OpenStreetMap hast und regelmäßig etwas beitragen möchtest, empfehle ich dir JOSM als Editor. Die überwiegende Mehrheit der aktiven Mapper benutzt JOSM als Haupt-Editor, weil er effizienter ist und weit mehr Möglichkeiten als iD bietet. Schon nach kurzer Einarbeitung geht damit vieles leichter, schneller und besser als mit iD.

http://learnosm.org/de/josm/start-josm/

Und eine Anleitung zu GoMap!! findest du hier: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Go_Map!!

Viel Spaß beim Mappen weiterhin und danke dafür, dass du OSM besser machst!

Gruß
Klaus aka geow
Constable (2017-07-26 15:39:51+00:00): ciao, perché hai aggiunto questi due oggetti?
Erano già mappati, sia il cestino di via brugallo, sia le panchine di via Maronati
Per favore rimuovi i due che hai aggiunto.
Mapper726 (2017-07-26 15:47:24+00:00): Il cestino non era segnato. Ce ne sono 2 in quella zona. Ne è presente uno anche tra le due panchine in Via Brugallo e non era segnato.
Per quanto riguarda le panchine in Via Maronati sono 2 non una. Penso vadano segnate entrambe, no?
Se ho sbagliato scusa, sono nuovo in OSM.
Constable (2017-07-26 15:55:54+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la risposta.
Il cestino era già mappato, il problema è che se alcuni oggetti sono vicini alle volte non li si vede sulla mappa; prima di aggiungere qualcosa scarica l'area con Vespucci, in questo caso ti saresti accorto che il cestino era già li http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3941334915
Stessa cosa per le panchine di via Maronati; le avevo aggiunte io stesso qualche tempo fa. Sono vicine quindi se ne vede solo una, a dire il vero non si vede neanche il cestino che è appena a fianco.
Una delle regole di OSM è non mappare per la mappa, nel senso che la mappa deve rappresentare la realtà, non essere bella da vedere. Openstreetmap è un contenitore di dati, ogni mappa che usa quei dati decide che elementi mostrare, quindi, i cestini e le panchine erano messi nella posizione reale, se poi su questo livello di mappa (mapnik) non si vedono pace, non è un problema nostro.
Già che ci sei, se sei interessato a mappare ti consiglio di inserire tra i segnalibri la wiki di openstreemap http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Pagina_Principale in cui trovi tutti i tag disponibili e le informazioni necessarie, e la mailing list della comunità italiana, su cui scrivere quando hai dubbi/problemi https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Se sei di Magenta, tieni conto che la città è già molto ben mappata.
Grazie per la collaborazione
Ciao
Mapper726 (2017-07-26 16:07:35+00:00): Ciao, grazie mille per i consigli!
La prossima volta starò più attento.
Come faccio ad eliminare i due oggetti che ho creato?
Constable (2017-07-26 16:12:30+00:00): dipende che editor usi per modificare la mappa. Per aggiungerli ho visto che hai usato vespucci, se vuoi rimuoverli con vespucci devi fare il download della zona in cui hai inserito l'oggetto, selezionarlo e premere il "bottone" con il cestino (giusto per stare in tema :D )
L'altro gruppo di modifiche (su via Mazenta) lo hai fatto con iD, dal browser, ti basta aprire openstreetmap.org, selezionare modifica in alto e andare a cercare i due oggetti, selezionarli, tasto destro del mouse, elimina.
Se sei interessato a una breve guida introduttiva puoi guardare qua http://learnosm.org/it/, viene spiegato come fare le operazioni base con i vari editor.
Se in futuro dovessi avere problemi o dubbi scrivi pure o in mailing list o a me; all'inizio abbiamo fatto tutti qualche casino con la mappa.
Ciao
Mapper726 (2017-07-26 16:17:48+00:00): Grazie mille davvero!
Dovrei esserci riuscito, grazie.
Ciao
polari (2017-07-28 09:37:09+00:00): Merkitsit tuon metsätien pihakaduksi. Pihakatuja on esimerkiksi Tehtaankatu Rauman keskustassa. Onko merkitty liikennemerkillä pihakaduksi? Service road-olisi muussa tapauksessa parempi.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-22 10:01:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1625903817/history  what kind of school is that?

elementary school? flight school? dog training?
arvdk (2017-09-01 20:12:23+00:00): Ook hier dubbele adres nodes. Deze heb ik voor je gerepareerd. JOSM gaf een validator warning.. groetjes, arvdk
Martin Borsje (2017-09-01 20:15:53+00:00): OK'
Dank je

Geen warnings gezien?
bobbert123 (2020-12-09 21:48:38+00:00): Gideon Italiaander bestaat niet meer
bobbert123 (2020-12-09 21:49:41+00:00): De Birkt is geen fa. Plekkepoel meer
ligfietser (2020-12-10 08:29:27+00:00): Pas het maar aan, dit zijn edits van jaren geleden
eggie (2017-07-26 18:08:42+00:00): De bedoeling is dat de kapperszaak op de bestaande adresnode wordt gezet. Nu komt het adres 2x voor.
Ik pas het aan.
eggie (2017-07-26 18:12:21+00:00): PB gestuurd en gevraagd om reactie.
muralito (2017-07-26 18:25:58+00:00): Hello roses7.

Why did ypou change this road name?
roses7 (2017-07-28 16:01:46+00:00): I used this source http://visualizador.imcanelones.gub.uy/ to add the road name but I added it to the wrong road segment. I reverted my edit. Thanks!
muralito (2017-07-28 20:05:28+00:00): OK. No problem. Please be careful and check the license. The whole government is moving to public domain or open data licenses, but i'm not sure if Canelones already did the movement.
user_5359 (2017-07-26 18:28:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
pm3123 (2017-07-26 19:23:37+00:00): You got it! I'll fix it right now!
SHARCRASH (2017-07-28 16:53:46+00:00): Hi! I noticed for the 3'rd time that you're not placing accurately the elements you edited these last days. Check the offset of your editor's imagery and correct its offset with a procise source.
saintam1 (2017-07-31 22:30:22+00:00): Привет,

Виждам, че си променил адреса на http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166218858 от "бл.31А" на "бл.30А". Това умишлено ли е? Аз тъкмо го бях променил и се чудя дали app-ът, който използваш, не разполага с най-новата база данни. Аз лично ходих да проверя и на блока пише '31А'.
goadelic (2017-08-01 05:40:12+00:00): Здравей,
Интересното тук е, че изобщо не съм променял адреса на сградата а само сложих брой етажи. Не знам как е станало през приложението MAPS.ME за Android.
Поправи го като е в реалността. Благодаря!
saintam1 (2017-08-02 09:20:17+00:00): Да, предполагам, че app-ът, който използваш, не беше регистрирал веднага направената от мен промяна. Мерси!
ViriatoLusitano (2017-07-26 20:32:52+00:00): Obrigado, ainda hoje visitei este sítio.
Reino Baptista (2017-07-27 22:26:08+00:00): Boas férias.
AndersAndersson (2017-07-27 07:04:52+00:00): Hej!
Glömde du sätta highway=path och eventuellt surface=ground på en av sträckorna (510524607)?
pereubu (2017-07-27 18:26:31+00:00): Tja!
Den är ganska övervuxen och oklart om den kan räknas som path längre
narceliodesa (2017-12-26 20:20:04+00:00): Olá Hernandes, porque tu mapeou as portarias do Alphaville como área militar? essa etiqueta é para demarcar uma área utilizada para fins militares, normalmente de acesso restrito ao público.
eggie (2017-07-26 21:21:56+00:00): natural=tree zet je op een node. het is voor seperate bomen.
Ik zal een paar voorbeelden erbij zetten
Dus hier landuse = grass en dan evt lossen nodes met bomen.
eggie (2017-07-26 21:22:43+00:00): Dit was jouw changeset http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50595911
Ik pas het aan
eggie (2017-07-26 21:38:01+00:00): Even wat landuse toegevoegd met losse bomen. natural=tree op een aparte node.. Dus niet op een vlak.
eggie (2017-07-26 21:38:30+00:00): Even als voorbeeld om het af te maken.
marc_marc_repair (2018-06-08 00:06:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59651727 where the changeset comment is: revert import données cadastrales du canton de Fribourg (problème de licence + problème de qualité + manque de discussion préalable à l'import)
سامبا (2017-08-12 21:13:45+00:00): Please read the OSM naming conventions (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names) Names should be always in the predominant 
local language.

The most important thing is that local people can use it in there daily lives. Many people in Mauritania cannot even read and write, and if they can, they can only read and write Arabic.

In Germany names are also in German, even if in English more people could understand them. In China they are also in Chinese, in Georgia they are in Georgian, with Georgian alphabet.

Since in Mauritania the nearly only used language is Arabic, they have to be in Arabic. Also, according to taginfo.openstreetmap.org, Arabic is more used on OSM than French.
sommerluk (2017-07-27 22:15:41+00:00): 👍
luckpogbe (2017-07-27 23:46:00+00:00): Very usefull application, i like it!
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-27 10:44:35+00:00): Dodanie ronda, to nie jest "Drobna aktualiaacja". Innymi słowy, prosiłbym o bardziej wyczerpujące opisy.
nyuriks (2017-11-19 02:42:37+00:00): hi, did mean to use "yes" and "no" instead of "true" and "false"?
user_5359 (2017-07-26 18:39:09+00:00): willkomen bei OSM! Bitte liest Dir mal die Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Packstation durch, damit Du Packstation auch so beschreibst, damit Sie auch gefundne werden können.
Marcel Dunkelberg (2017-07-26 18:51:46+00:00): Hallo und Danke für Deinen Hinweis. Habe die Packstationen entsprechend editiert.
stephan75 (2017-08-05 20:28:57+00:00): Hallo Alkazaa, in diesem Änderungssatz hast du u.a. in Lüneburg in der William-Watt-Straße die Form eines Gebäudes geändert, sodass jetzt eine Spitze davon mehrere zig Meter weit nach Osten ragt.

Ursache ist dieser Punkt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1350469466

Wolltest du das Gebäude dort derartig verändern?

Oder nur den Hydranten eintragen?

Ist denn der Hydrant Nr.  892 dort am Ende der Wilhelm-Hillmer-Straße so richtig?

Gruß, Stephan
DaveF (2017-07-27 16:20:52+00:00): Hi
The restaurant already exists as a building polygon in OSM
eggie (2017-07-26 21:09:04+00:00): name=   is not a correct use. 
That's in the same way as this is a bench or this is a house.
Look in the wiki how to tag a waste-disposal.
I will change it. 
-	Nuttige links. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM (een introductiepagina met veel nuttige tips onder het kopje 'Waar moet je op letten als je de kaart gaat bewerken?') http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features (overzicht van vrijwel alle elementen die in OSM gebruikt worden) https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 (Nederlandstalig deel van forum; de plek om vragen te stellen en ideeën op te doen)
eggie (2017-07-26 21:17:19+00:00): aangepast
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-27 16:02:02+00:00): Hi, newly created footways 510547164, 510545824, 510545789 and 510544174 all have access=no and foot=yes. Whilst this combination is not invalid, it does lead to confusion. As the access=no is overridden by foot=yes for pedestrians, and no other transport method is by default allowed for a footway, the access=no tag doesn't change the access rights at all. It does however lead to confusion as to whether a mapper intended all access to be prohibited without noticing the foot=yes tag (generally when evaluating the tags, you don't know whether they were added separately or at the same time. I suggest removing the access=no tag if pedestrians are allowed to use the footways, otherwise remove the foot=yes tag.

Regards,
Mike
rwrev (2018-01-23 20:01:57+00:00): Some anomalous data appears to be part of this changeset.
**way id="510548248" indicates self as aeroway=runway, and lists length of "11095 ft", but the referenced nodes <nd ref="1523113554"/> <nd ref="3402826496"/> appear to cover less than a couple hundred feet, was this to be a blast_pad or displaced_threshold that is not currently marked as such?  If marked as blast_pad/displaced_threshold the length should be corrected or removed.
**way id="510548245" This way indicates <tag k="ref" v="07L/25R"/> is marked as a displaced_threshold, and the v="?" should only reference the runway (end) it belongs to.
**way id="510548249" is indicated as blast_pad but is labeled with both runway designators, <tag k="ref" v="06R/24L"/>, it should have only the runway designator for the runway it is part of.
**way id="510548250" lists <tag k="length" v="10285 ft"/> but its nodes appear to cover only a few hundred feet.  The length should be corrected or removed.  It is also labeled k="ref" v="06R/24L" but marked as a displaced_threshold which is only on one of those runway(end)s, and should have v="the end it is part of".
**way id="510548251" is marked as blastpad by lists <tag k="length" v="10285 ft"/> while its nodes appear to cover only a few hundred ft. The length should be corrected or removed.  It is also labeled with <tag k="ref" v="06R/24L"/> but should have only the designator for the runway (end) it is part of.
**way id="510548252" is marked as a blast_pad but labeled with <tag k="ref" v="06L/24R"/>.  It should only be labeled with the runway (end) it is part of.
**way id="138935869" is marked as a blast_pad but labeled with <tag k="ref" v="07R/25L"/>.  It should only be labeled with the runway (end) it is part of.
4b696d (2018-01-23 22:27:11+00:00): I fixed some things but I don't see why thresholds and blast pads should not carry the full name of the runway.
rwrev (2018-01-26 01:17:25+00:00): A 'single runway strip' is actually two separate runways for air traffic.
A (single) blast pad or threshold is only on one runway (one end of a strip), not both ends.  OSM data seems to only record one strip to represent two otherwise logically separate (for air traffic) runways, and additionally in renderings uses the combined label, when only the applicable part of those combined labels should be used on the runway (strip end) to which it belongs - at least to follow US FAA guidelines.  But the blast_pad/displaced_thresholds for each runway (end) are (have to be, since they are disjoint?) recorded separately, and hence really only the runway (end) to which they belong should be used to label them.  I am by no means an authority, but you can see that I do have an opinion. :)
It seems OSM could have actually represented the runways separately, with two ways (one for each logical runway) that listed the representing nodes in opposite order.  But so far, having only been working with three US states, this does not seem to have been done anywhere.  Maybe there's something I'm not aware of that makes it a bad idea.