piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
saerdnaer (2021-09-18 16:21:17+00:00): Whats your source for these rules? 

According to the Nominatin developers and my per personal experience of 14 years OSM, housenumbers should always be connected to a building. If you really want to define the entrance you can add an housenumber node on the buildings outline, but totally disconnecting the housenumber from the building is definitely wrong.
ivanbranco (2021-09-18 19:35:05+00:00): Hi saerdnaer,

you're both right. The address is connected to the building... but not in Italy. In Italy the address doesn't identify a building but an entrance, so the italian community tags addresses as nodes.

See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Italy
archie (2021-08-21 07:23:35+00:00): You have procuced rather a lot of errors latly (https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=18.51792&lat=57.70839&zoom=10&overlays=duplicate_node,single_node_in_way,duplicate_segment,intersection,intersecting_segments,ring_not_closed,touching_rings,role_should_be_inner,role_should_be_outer,inner_with_same_tags,old_style_multipolygons,same_tags_on_outer_ring,ways). All are related to multipolygon-issues. One wonders if you have a grasp of the nature of multipolygons. Anyway, would you kindly fix all those errors. Thanks!
archie (2021-08-21 12:27:26+00:00): För din info; det västra området - närmast Visby - har jag åtgärdat. Vi får avvakta till dess att omsi har uppdaterats för att se om jag förbisett några fel.
archie (2021-08-21 14:16:22+00:00): intressant skogspolynon: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13103368
DD1GJ (2021-08-25 10:26:31+00:00): Hallo windkraft-os,

könntest Du bei abgebauten WEAs bitte den Lebenzyklus-Präfix https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix für alle Tags verwenden? Wenn Du nur power=generator entfernst, meinen andere Sesselmapper, dass dass Tagging fehlerhaft sei und bauen das Ding halbautomatisch wieder auf. Beispiel: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110217473

Beschreibung oder Änderungssatzkommentare werden bei Massen-Edits oft nicht berücksichtigt.

Vollständiges Löschen ist auch keine Lösung, denn dann meinen andere Sesselmapper anhand veralteter Listen oder Luftbilder, dass da was fehlt.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
skyper (2022-01-08 13:37:43+00:00): Die einzige bisherige Antwort:

https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/114974383
DressyPear4 (2021-08-23 20:51:31+00:00): Olá, não adicione linhas de forma aleatória, se estiver em construção ou não for visível, mantenha o traçado mais próximo do correto possível, ou deixe uma anotação no local
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110007158
marc__marc (2024-09-19 21:06:59+00:00): Hello,
if it's now maxspeed=30 for some roads, it'sn't source:maxspeed=BE-VLG:urban anymore but source:maxspeed=BE:zone30 
for ex https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23645788/history
Regards,
Marc
Allison P (2021-08-26 19:38:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/909791424

+=bridleway es un error, ¿verdad?
WoodWoseWulf (2021-08-21 09:11:54+00:00): Hi LincDk,
Thanks for your updates. When I last visted Strickland about 12 months ago, there was a sign at the North end of the track you removed stating that visitors are welcome to Narara Eco Village... is this no longer the case?
LincDk (2021-08-21 12:03:07+00:00): Hey there. Yep, since then we've learnt that the Strickland forest authorities dont want any public access from the ecovillage. Also, that road leads to other area's of the ecovillage are are residents only (like the dam etc) and people using alltrails app are turning up in droves without a clear understanding they are on private property. So all up, the access road should be removed from the public database.
eggie (2021-08-21 11:34:43+00:00): Besste Padvinder... Waar is alle landuse gebleven in je changeset met als commentaar Details omg Sint Nicolaasga.

Waarom met een simpele editor de landuse te lijf? Dat is gewoon vragen om problemen.
Ik zal kijke of het hier simpel is op te lossen. Verder zie ik track verschijnen, maar mag een ieder hier ook over rijden of is het wellicht access=private?
Zie https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110008227

De landuse is niet gesloten.
Probeer nu svp mbv van bv achavi je edits te checken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-21 11:46:11+00:00): Landuse hersteld
IlBano (2021-12-27 17:07:09+00:00): Ciao damianeue.

In questo changeset hai mappato i penduncoli di uscita dall'A14 con access=no, di fatto "chiudendo" in uscita il casello di Roseto. Era una situazione temporanea ?

Grazie

Ciao

IlBano
damianeue (2021-12-27 17:11:51+00:00): Controllerò quanto prima di persona, se riesco anche domani
damianeue (2021-12-30 09:35:58+00:00): Ciao IlBano, ho sistemato come da tua segnalazione. Grazie
IlBano (2021-12-30 09:53:11+00:00): Ottimo. Grazie
Ciao
Friendly_Ghost (2021-08-20 22:33:40+00:00): Please excuse me for mistakenly press "upload all" instead of "upload selection"
ottwiz (2021-08-22 14:05:17+00:00): + I used NAIP too.
GoatoftheNorth (2021-08-20 23:33:57+00:00): I made a mistake. The citation should have been Maxar Premium Imagery (1.79; 1.64), Strava.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110009100
amuppidi (2021-08-20 23:31:25+00:00): fixed placement and added paths in little river commons community. added retail area for community corner plaza near tall cedars parkway. added outdoor seating area for gateway community church, and for gum spring village shopping center. added parking aisles and service roads near defender dr. changed classification of residential roads in the hartland community. added parking lot for old farm winery off of Fleetwood rd and hartland dr (new construction). added road names and paths in gateway commons community near dehavilland dr. 

fixed placement the following roads: 

1. elk lick rd at tall cedars pkwy

2. belmont ridge rd at rt 267 toll rd

3. park center dr at frying pan rd/sunrise valley dr

4. s riding blvd at john mosby hwy

5. sunrise valley dr at hunter mill rd

6. plaza america dr near sunset hills rd

7. sayward blvd at carta way

8. service roads along sunrise valley dr

9. rolling fork cir at fox mill rd/sunrise valley dr. 

added foot paths near frying pan rd and fairfax county pkwy, and at sidewalk at poland rd.
mueschel (2021-08-26 19:21:36+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "bicycle:lts=0" to many different roads. What does it mean? Is there some documentation?
ElliottPlack (2021-09-02 15:46:53+00:00): Hey there, sorry this comment slipped through my emails but I wanted to reply. The LTS score is a quantitative measure of the traffic stress a bicycle rider would feel.

I haven't found any osm documentation yet so I've been adding the tag with the hope of proposing a standard on the wiki. I believe it would be a good candidate for mapping since the formula is based on highway characteristics and nothing subjective, (perhaps) unlike the sac_scale or something like that.

In this case, a road separated bicycle path is the lowest possible stress score, zero.

Here's some more info. What do you think?

https://blog.altaplanning.com/level-of-traffic-stress-what-it-means-for-building-better-bike-networks-c4af9800b4ee
mueschel (2021-09-02 16:08:26+00:00): Hi,
thanks for the reply.

So, this is yet another approach to tag how a bicyclist might feel. There are already several approaches by local communities. For some reason they all claim their own approach is incompatible with existing tagging, use it in a very small area and don't write documentation.

There is at least the documented 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:class:bicycle

There is someone in Minnesota advocating "LOS" and "LOS2" tags.

There is a larger group in Berlin who developed a scheme to describe physical features of bicycle lanes in great detail (unfortunately in German only)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Radwege#Tagging-Beispiele

... and I think I remember at least 2 more "bicycle experience" schemes, which I can't find now because of the obscure keys they used. 
I think it would be beneficial to start a discussion about a tagging scheme and involve all these groups in it.
ElliottPlack (2021-09-02 16:14:26+00:00): Agree 100% and thank you for bringing this up. I've started the conversation on the OSM US Slack and will bring it up in the lists, and with those other communities. I'll poke around at some of these other options already in use as well. Perhaps I could join forces by the Minn. folks.
ovruni (2021-08-21 00:09:28+00:00): Hola, nuevamente veo que ha agregado más areas colindantes del mismo tipo, la última vez que le pregunté no me dijo el motivo. ¿Me puede decir esta vez el motivo?
Saludos
TuAmigoElEditor (2021-08-21 00:47:46+00:00): Lo siento pero se me hace facil hacerlo asi ya que hay zonas que no clasifican como zona residencial y las trato de evitar.
Saludos
ovruni (2021-08-21 00:53:39+00:00): No solamente se han agregado zonas residenciales colindantes, sino comerciales también, por eso lo pregunto.
Saludos
Allison P (2024-04-21 05:03:26+00:00): Re: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975126251, could you use turn restrictions?
InsertUser (2021-09-15 00:14:02+00:00): This doesn't appear on the cited imagery. Do you have another source?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110009487
JackMaverick (2021-09-16 13:38:23+00:00): It is still under construction
https://lighthousepointbahamas.com/progress/
InsertUser (2021-09-17 01:41:57+00:00): Construction should be prefixed or tagged with dedicated construction tagging. In this case proposed would be more appropriate as construction hasn't started. However overriding both of those is the copyright notice on the bottom of that page indicating that it doesn't meet the licensing requirements for inclusion in OSM.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Construction
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data
JackMaverick (2021-09-17 20:58:37+00:00): Deleted.  I will add when completed.
fkv (2021-08-23 10:58:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 110108795 where the changeset comment is: revert 110009868, weil dabei Daten (u.a. von mir) verloren gingen, Details siehe note #2149311
Woazboat (2022-04-08 01:23:59+00:00): Daten aus diesem changeset wurden in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119448104 teilweise wiederhergestellt
Frans S (2021-08-25 09:12:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please update not each individual mapped building, but collect them .
-
A remark.
Most Buildings have a rectangular shape and  needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please square each building with the Q key of the iDeditor.
 A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners.
When parts of a building are hidden by trees, extrapolate the rooflines rather than following the treelines.

See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg

Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/

Best regards and success with future mappings
okadatsuneo (2021-11-17 23:54:28+00:00): Hi,
Because 河内熊川線 is one of the Fukui Prefectural Roads, it is tagged as highway=secondary.
See wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_tagging
Jeffrey Friedl (2021-11-22 03:55:21+00:00): Real OpenStreetMap rules take precedence over local conventions. See TRUE OpenStreetMap instructions:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=secondary

Marking this dead-end road as "highway=secondary" is wrong, and unhelpful both to humans and automated routing.
Frans S (2021-08-21 08:34:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Each rectangular building needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor.
Most of the buildings are strickt rectangular.
 A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
When parts of a building are hidden by trees, extrapolate the rooflines rather than following the treelines.

See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg

Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/

Best regards and success with future mappings
WotanF (2021-09-09 12:06:49+00:00): Please revert,
Mr. Taiwan has messed up so much again. Just one example:
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/857320321
user_11418917 (2021-08-21 05:00:22+00:00): Describe your edits with the changeset comment please! Please read the comment I left you in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106063627
Mike_A_L2020 (2021-08-21 02:49:10+00:00): Las tres casa juntas estan tras el mismo porton de la ACAFESAL (y venden cafe molido a $3.50, pegado a un cartel en el portón verde)
Mike_A_L2020 (2021-08-21 02:52:23+00:00): Pase caminando hoy el Centro Comercial Granada (hoy Salvador del Mundo) y noté que faltaban locales nuevos. Agregue todas que pude. el venta de zapatos y la optica aun no tienen nombres visibles y estaban cerradas.
Kovoschiz (2021-08-21 07:36:23+00:00): Although this was wrong, your interpretation is not entirely accurate either. `bus=yes` can mean all bus can use it, including coach bus, private bus, "tourist bus", etc. `access=private` or `motor_vehicle=private` would already allow certain bus in by individual permission.
hanchao (2021-08-22 01:20:19+00:00): OSM是中立地图。请不要随意删除军事用地
Jakka (2021-08-21 08:33:10+00:00): Sur ce tronçon il y a plusieurs route point nœuds et route ravel.... Les déviation sont bien installer sur place ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110012130
Celejowski C (2021-08-21 08:44:25+00:00): Oui, tout est deviez sur la rive gauche (coter Amay) que ce sois les Ravel et les eurovelo. Rive droite il n'y a plus que la RN90 qui est sur deux bande au lieux de quatres et interdite au piéton et cycliste.
Frans S (2021-08-21 09:07:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Each rectangular building needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor.
Most of the buildings are strickt rectangular.
 A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
When parts of a building are hidden by trees, extrapolate the rooflines rather than following the treelines.

See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg

Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/

Best regards and success with future mappings
Johncarlo (2021-08-21 12:45:45+00:00): Hello Frans, I thank you for your remark. I'll try to make them better next.
You're welcome!
Frans S (2021-08-21 09:03:52+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
Each rectangular building needs to be squared. See the task instructions.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the Q key of the iDeditor.
Most of the buildings are strickt rectangular.
 A remark here. When your corners are not close enough to the 90 degrees angle the Issue triangle on the right hand menu don't react so try to map more precise and close to the 90 degrees corners
When parts of a building are hidden by trees, extrapolate the rooflines rather than following the treelines.

See this picture (example) Review own work in iDeditor.jpg

Did you have seen these pages ?
https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/

Best regards and success with future mappings
AnuradhaRajanayake (2021-08-21 15:04:24+00:00): Yes, I did those changes
shanhulittle (2021-08-23 13:39:48+00:00): 建成区社区请使用place=neighbourhood标签
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/China#.E6.9D.91.E7.BA.A7.E8.87.AA.E6.B2.BB.E7.BB.84.E7.BB.87.2FVillage_level
bxl-forever (2021-08-22 12:35:08+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for spotting this.
I completed the change and also updated the name on the other segments of the same street.
francians (2021-08-21 06:35:46+00:00): Ciao,

Grazie per il contributo.
Al posto di condition, se è impraticabile anche in MTB:

smoothness=impassable

Se è impraticabile a piedi, cambia la Key highway in was:highway in modo che sparisca anche dalla mappa (senza cancellarlo).

Grazie ancora
Francesco
NetWormKido (2021-09-09 04:32:48+00:00): Добрый день, на этой развязке дорога, уходящая на Томск, пересекается https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230082843 , но не имеет общей точки в месте пересечения. У меня есть подозрение, что после реконструкции/постройки развязки этот кусок для разворота убрали. Можете подтвердить?
Mikhail Kruglov (2021-09-09 04:39:41+00:00): Здравствуйте, если честно, внимания не обратил, проехал мимо, но вполне вероятно что да, этот разворот как минимум перекрыт.
NetWormKido (2021-09-09 05:07:33+00:00): Михаил, похоже вы удалили лишнего. Два съезда, о которых речь не шла надо вернуть. Они там по логике точно должны быть.
NetWormKido (2021-09-09 05:15:32+00:00): Как минимум нужно вернуть съезд по направлению с Новосиба в Томск.
NetWormKido (2021-09-09 05:17:09+00:00): Тот, который убрали с Томска на Кемерово скорее всего действительно не нужен. Там поворот через мост идёт.
ivanbranco (2022-05-03 20:36:45+00:00): Hi Marych_

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6321499985

are you sure that a caffe with georgian and mexican "cuisine" in georgia has a name in cyrillic? Could you check it out?
Marych_ (2022-05-05 09:28:10+00:00): Hi ivanbranco,

I was there last summer. Sign was in cyrillic.
Li-H (2021-08-23 14:52:25+00:00): Убрал задваивающиеся одинаковые теги на внешней границе полигона сельхозугодий под Руновщиной.
Basik71 (2021-08-23 07:39:39+00:00): Ciao,
ho dovuto annullare la tua classificazione della circonvallazione di Olbia che non è affatto Trunk. Si tratta di strada a scorrimento veloce (Tipo C) a doppio senso di marcia, e con limiti di velocità molto ridotti.
Ciao
Fra00 (2021-08-23 07:44:27+00:00): Ciao. "Trunk" non è per forza una strada con carreggiate separate, stai attento. Una strada a scorrimento veloce è trunk! Quali sono questi limiti ridotti?
Fra00 (2021-08-23 07:46:28+00:00): In ogni caso, la strada è trunk: "Le strade extraurbane ad una sola corsia per senso di marcia, che però non presentano incroci sul loro percorso e abbiano accessi ed uscite mediati da corsie di ac/de-celerazione potrebbero essere marcati da highway=trunk, per distinguerle da altre strade che potrebbero presentare incroci e rotonde" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway). Se puoi, sarebbe meglio ti annullassi da solo in caso.
woodpeck (2021-09-04 19:03:31+00:00): Hello Maskulinum, I think you're over-doing it with your attempts at "streamlining" OpenStreetMap data. This is just one changeset of many but I think that there are better uses of your time than playing with taginfo and finding rare tags and guessing what might have been meant by them. You have zero local knowledge in most of the areas you're editing in. Try going out mapping for a change.
user_5359 (2021-08-21 16:44:21+00:00): Hello, Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/628758309: What ist the maning of the tag false=A?
eggie (2021-08-21 09:01:46+00:00): Dag Luc  Je vraagt om feedback.
Er liggen vier oversteekplaatsen los op de kruising Speltpad en Roggehegge.
Eigenlijk hoef je alleen maar een oversteekplaats te maken als dit staat aangegeven op de weg dmv bv belijning. 
De losse nodes heb ik  verwijderd.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110016571
MVG
eggie
PaoloLombardi (2021-09-29 16:06:47+00:00): Come da verifica sul campo il percorso N. 975184170 è poi una "track" e non un "path". Ricolgo l'occasione per suggerirti di fare più attenzione nel fare la scelta giusta dei tag più appropriati ed idonei a quella che è la realtà. Più collaborativo di così! Saluti.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-08 07:31:21+00:00): zapraszam do komentowania na https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/relacje-kategorie-do-skasowania-parkomaty-zdm-poznan/127066
eggie (2021-08-21 09:07:03+00:00): JOSM de hik...  Commentaar vier losse highway=crossing verwijderd. Nergens aan vast.
Vastzittende nodes laten staan. Twijfels of het oversteekplaatsen zijn.
Lee Carré (2021-08-22 22:46:49+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
user_8655426 (2021-12-02 09:32:41+00:00): 変更セットコメント訂正： 三番鉄橋 -> 二番鉄橋
Basik71 (2021-08-24 11:08:27+00:00): Sei sicuro dell'opportunità di definire superstrada questo tratto di SS597 proprio in questo momento? Attualmente la strada è un cantiere per tutta la sua estensione, la carreggiata è ridotta di un quarto rispetto alla larghezza originale, il limite di velocità è fissato a 50 km/h (con cartelli ripetuti anche in assenza di intersezioni) da Oschiri a Berchidda, vige il divieto di sorpasso, in prossimità della Strada del Vermentino è in fase di ultimazione una deviazione di circa 1 km su percorso alternativo ed il viavai dei mezzi pesanti della trasformazione in SS729 è continuo.
Fra00 (2021-08-24 11:24:12+00:00): Si può riportare a primary tranquillamente, i lavori prima o poi finiranno e sarà nella sua veste definitiva. Questa deviazione di cui parli andrebbe però segnata in qualche modo, se ancora non ultimata come strada in costruzione.
Fra00 (2021-08-24 11:26:43+00:00): Un'altra cosa: non è in costruzione tutta la tratta? Perché la linea della strada in costruzione ne copre solo una parte?
Basik71 (2021-08-24 15:18:06+00:00): Aggiungo la deviazione di cantiere tracciandola "a vista", in attesa di rilevare la posizione esatta col GPS.
Si tratta di una deviazione temporanea finalizzata alla realizzazione di un nuovo ponte lungo l'asse principale.
La linea in costruzione è invece relativa alla sola carreggiata nord (direzione SS), in affiancamento al tracciato attuale che a fine lavori sarà carreggiata sud (verso Olbia). Mi pareva inutile sovrapporre il tracciato in costruzione a quello esistente, visto che il lotto 4 della SS729 prevede il solo adeguamento del percorso esistente.
KartoGrapHiti (2021-10-04 06:56:28+00:00): Der vordere Teil der Straße Am Wall ist keine Einbahnstraße. Ich habe daher den Eintrag wieder entfernt. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=838299587094115
eggie (2021-08-21 11:11:39+00:00): Beste Libbe,
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Wanneer het pad niet meer herkenbaar is als pad dan is het correct.
Wanneer het nog wel herkenbaar is hebben we een procedure op het gefaseerd te laten verdwijnen om te voorkomen dat medemappers het weer gaan intekenen.
highway:disused=path
Zie ook dit draadje.. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73238

Zo is het pad gisteren ingetekend door medemapper Padvinder.
Je zou kunnen vragen wat zijn bron is.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110021957
Op vragen van mij komt helaas geen antwoord meer. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109956699#map=16/53.0898/6.3042

MVG
eggie
E de Wit (2021-08-21 12:16:40+00:00): Op de obliekbeelden (2021-04-20) is er een fysieke barrière aan de noordzijde met opgehoogde grond en aan de zuidzijde een hek.
Het voormalige pad is op meerdere plekken (helaas) nog wel duidelijk zichtbaar.

Pragmatisch gezien denk ik dat disused:highway=path met een noexit=yes het meeste recht doet aan de situatie. (Ervan uitgaande dat de situatie niet is veranderd de laatste 4 maand)

-E de Wit
eggie (2021-08-21 12:32:31+00:00): typo  disused:highway=path  inderdaad.. Had het niet meer helder voorogen.
Procedure dan 
1. In het veld duidelijk ontoegankelijk maken
2. Indien met verbod of hek: in OSM access en/of barrier taggen
3. Indien met "natuurlijke" middelen (doornstruiken, greppel, houtwal): in OSM disused:highway taggen en een note toevoegen. Welke note is dan het meest effectief en zorgt voor weinig discussie? Zoiets: note=Aangepast door medewerker terreineigenaar Natuurmonumenten?
4. Zodra het zodanig overgroeid is dat het pad als verdwenen kan worden beschouwd, het pad ook uit OSM verwijderen.

Maar wellicht is het inderdaad nu al overgroeid met al die nattigheid de laatste tijd.
gr eggie