piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
WoodWoseWulf (2022-01-25 03:03:45+00:00): Hi Loopylupus3,

Welcome to OSM!

You might have noticed the errors you would have gotten when you published this changeset.

The park you added is a little strange - it's full of pedestrian crossings and self-intersecting lines. You also seem to have given the park a building:levels tag?

You might want to take a look at what you've done here and give it a bit of a cleanup. Please feel free to reach out if you need help.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-01-25 03:08:49+00:00): Actually - never mind, looking at the latest Maxar satellite Imagery, it seems like you've added this over houses. Please do not add fictional features to OSM, they will be removed.
gmar5 (2022-01-25 09:48:50+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your fixes to swimming pool tags. However, if possible, I would like to encourage some more care in checking the local cases. 

In this example, the building exists but is disused, so the amenity does not. In a nearby case in Swinford, it was a swimming pool maintenance company in a commercial area (it also moved to a new location), not a swimming pool. I corrected both.

Best wishes.
w_morland (2022-01-25 12:30:09+00:00): Thanks for correcting these. I hope to avoid repeating the issue in the future.
sundew (2022-01-24 23:14:45+00:00): .. ein Node in Prepow ungewollt mit in den Changeset gerutscht ..
Silur (2022-01-24 23:08:23+00:00): Buchtstraße doch auf effektiv secondary zurückgenommen - der primary-Verkehr läuft vermutl. über Kuhmühle.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116562640
Silur (2022-01-25 18:32:38+00:00): Text hätte lauten müssen: Die Hohenfelder Brücken werden bis 2024 ersetzt, hierzu wurde die Kreuzung umgestaltet und soll wohl überwiegend so bis zum Ende der Baumaßnahmen bleiben.
GinaroZ (2022-01-27 22:18:57+00:00): Why change it to suburb when it's not one? Surely changing the city to would be better?
RobJN (2022-01-28 12:08:39+00:00): Because the Postal Town has been recorded in addr:city, and addr:suburb is the next level. It's a hierarchy and the words "city" and "suburb" can be ignored. For more info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses_in_the_United_Kingdom
GinaroZ (2022-01-28 21:20:06+00:00): I thought from the (many!) emails that I read on talk-gb, we weren't using post towns given these are for Royal Mail and not OSM? Cowie is a village so it doesn't make sense to tag it as a suburb of its post town. So I've retagged all of these to move the suburb to the city.
RobJN (2022-01-28 22:48:51+00:00): I think that was a topic that split opinions. Some want to use Postal Towns (likely as it is a standard they are used to) while others don't see the need to align to RM. I didn't want to wade in to that one with this edit so I focussed on correcting a known issue (addr:place misused). As a local mapper you seem better placed to decide on a addr:city tag :-)
CRCulver (2022-11-09 02:28:06+00:00): What is the source for the access=destination tag on Lake Drive? (The road going south from 33.08920, -117.11343.) I changed this to motor_vehicle=destination, because the access= tag is usually too general, but I wonder if even motor_vehicle=destination is justified. Is there signage there indicating that the road is for residents only?
BCNorwich (2022-01-25 08:29:43+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've tweaked a few of your feature tags to suit OSM practice, (surface=sand, surface=grass).

Please see:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course  and:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf%3Dhole  for advice/guidance.

Regards Bernard.
Panda 320 (2022-03-13 22:18:26+00:00): Hallo Bienson,
wenn ich das richtig verstanden habe, dann gehören Gewerbe-, Parkplatz- und Wohnflächen nicht zu einem Park.
Richtig?
Dann sollte die bebaute Fläche südlich der Hörder Hafenstraße vom DOCK1 bis einschließlich dem Hafenquartier heraus genommen werden, bis ausschließlich der Hafenpromenade.
Das sind Gewerbeflächen, ob da auch Wohnraum ist, ist mir gerade nicht bekannt.
Auf dem Gelände vom Hafenquartier entsteht ein ca. 12 geschössiger Bau, wenn ich mich richtig entsinne, soll da ein Seniorenzentrum rein.
Das Magazin ist ein reines Wohnhaus, früher mal das Magazin von Phoenix West.
InsertUser (2022-01-25 22:25:11+00:00): Please don't make test edits on the main database.
Lee Carré (2022-01-25 08:11:11+00:00): Another mechanical edit?
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-01-25 11:47:10+00:00): I loaded up everything with bicycle_rental=*, then cleaned up those values as appropriate.

I checked all the values one by one (or per related group) in order not to break anything.

I'm not planning on repeating this in the near future.
kartonage (2022-06-13 16:52:18+00:00): A bit late but: I'm not sure I get the rationale behind changing "bicycle_rental=cargo_bike" to "bicycle_rental=cargo bike" when the actual tagging schme is also rental=cargo_bike. This applies to all changed bicycle_rental=cargo_bike-Elements in Berlin, Germany.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-06-14 17:47:21+00:00): Hi,

I'm not entirely sure what I precisely did here; the main focus of this change indeed was to add the `rental=cargo_bike` tag. Maybe I should indeed add the `_` again in `bicycle_rental=cargo bike`
Supaplex030 (2022-07-28 21:46:51+00:00): @cargo bikes in Berlin: I have now added the new tag "bicycle_rental=institutional" for the cargo bike rental system in Berlin, as "bicycle_rental" describes the type of a rental station, not the type of bike that can be rented ("rental=cargo_bike" is fine for that). None of the "bicycle_rental"-types documented so far fits otherwise, as this are not "rental stations" in the stricter sense, but rather a rental system connected to locations.
tastrax (2022-01-25 10:49:36+00:00): Several of the roads/tracks that you recently added are actually on private property (Near the Iris River) therefore the access tag should be Private - I have just updated them
followtheminotaur (2022-01-25 11:36:30+00:00): Thanks for that! I was just extending the existing track which was incomplete, and forgot to check permissions.
paunofu (2022-02-02 17:15:20+00:00):  Bona vesprada Jordi, recorda que information=guidepost va amb tourism=information, trobe que és error de l’OsmAnd. Gràcies per la teua labor arreu del País Valencià :)
Jordi MF (2022-02-02 21:42:55+00:00): Siii. Ja em vaig adonar. Espere que no se'm passe per alt quan revise la zona. Se m'acumula la feina...
paunofu (2022-02-02 23:28:32+00:00): Ací et deixe un enllaç d'overpass amb tots els "guidepost" on falta "tourism" a la Marina Alta. És més, si vols ho arregle jo en un moment.

http://overpass-turbo.eu/?q=LyoKVGhpcyBoYcSGYmVlbiBnxI1lcmF0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIG92xJJwxIlzLXR1cmJvIHdpemFyZC7EgsSdxJ9yaWdpbmFsIHNlxLBjaMSsxIk6CsOiwoDCnMS6Zm9ybcSUaW9uPWd1aWRlcG9zdCDEuiBEw4PCqW5pYcWIwp0KKi8KW291dDpqc8WSXVt0aW1lxa7FsDI1XTsKLy8gZmV0xYIgxLDFgCDFiMKcxaHFo8WlxafEm8SrxL_FgcWDxLoKe3vEkG9jb8WYQXLFgDpsYSBNxLDEusamQWx0YX19LT4uxpVyxYLGocWAxoDGgsSPxJTEnXIgxqJzdcatcwooCiAgxrtxdcSSxJrEo3LFncWMcjrGjMWJxYvFjcWPxbfFksWUxZbFmMWaxZzFp8eIIG53clsix5jFjsWQxZIiPSLFlcWXxZnFm3QixbUhInTFrsS3c23HtijGimHGtMWAxrZoxrhhKcaAx4nHowrIicaBxoNwxLduxZ3HgceDdMeFxbvEmMafecaAPsaAyJlza2XEvXF0Ow&c=BJqyFCKMAN
Jordi MF (2022-02-03 00:25:28+00:00): Oh, si ho fas tu, perfecte! Tardaràs molt menys que com ho anava a fer jo: editar-ho al mateix temps que resolia les notes.
Si veig que no ho has pogut fer, utilitzaré eixe Overpass.
paunofu (2022-02-03 00:38:49+00:00): Ja està fet, per si vols pegar una ullada està en aquest changeset.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116940875#map=12/38.7711/-0.1270&layers=N
aceman444 (2022-05-08 21:02:04+00:00): The place does not look like a system of dykes. Embankment would be something else.

Also learn to write changeset comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
abrensch (2022-01-26 09:06:10+00:00): Hallo k127,

the TR you added is wrong, see:

http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=18/48.61914/13.00150/standard&lonlats=13.002405,48.619094;13.001113,48.61914&profile=car-eco

regards, Arndt
k127 (2022-01-27 13:46:52+00:00): Hallo Arndt,

danke für den Hinweis! Habe ich geändert [1]. Hättest du eine Idee, wie sich die Regel bereits in JOSM prüfen lässt?

Beste Grüße
Klaus

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116667635
MasonSellsFL (2022-01-26 14:41:55+00:00): Looks like a fantasy mapper edit created a fake connection across Six Mile Cypress slough between Penzance Blvd and Six Mile Cypress Parkway. Its seems to be a pattern that the "fantasy mappers" leave little errors here and there, but seem to "fix" their big fantasy creations.
MasonSellsFL (2022-01-26 14:26:04+00:00): Just looking through the edits in the area, lately there have been fantasy mappers throwing up bogus data. Looks like someone made Luckett road so it goes through. According to LCPA and the local plat, as well as aerials, much of this edit was putting down fake features.

Whoever is doing these edits is sneaky. As Grouper said, these "fantasy mappers" seem to put down a lot of fake developments. That is something I noticed, they also map real features in with their fakes so as to appear legitimate.

They then clean up their fake data, and then leave little "easter eggs" of errors throughout the areas they mess with.

It appears the fantasy mapper(s) mark their fake data edits as a random number, and their partial corrections as just fix.
Gisolic (2022-01-31 12:41:04+00:00): Hello K1u9r8d9;
I noticed you change the classification for ways and didn't change the links associated with it.
Example for links should upgrade the classification:-
1- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617717952
2- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/617717953
Regards
Gisolic
Falsernet (2022-01-25 01:41:48+00:00): Plus some building shapes. Transferred Mulberry Tree to building
mariotomo (2022-01-25 16:29:22+00:00): did you notice that the relation is now broken? any intention to help OSM, or you're too much enjoying just messing around?
watmildon (2023-03-10 03:48:44+00:00): Stumbled across this edit while doing other things. Great work!!
angys (2022-03-02 18:34:33+00:00): Hello, do you interest to join a local community OSM telegram group?
Supaplex (2022-01-25 05:01:49+00:00): 你可以編輯時打開 note 的選項，然後在編輯時關閉，就會在儲存時記錄關了那些 note
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116565457
nfx2851 (2022-01-27 01:54:31+00:00): 感謝提點，沒發現有這個功能
nitram1234 (2022-02-03 12:59:10+00:00): Nice job!
marczoutendijk (2022-02-04 18:10:13+00:00): Hi,
In this changeset you have many barrier=w which is not a valid value for barrier. What did you mean to say?

Neste conjunto de alterações tem muitas barrier=w, o que não é um valor válido para barrier. O que queria dizer?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
aselvadeasfalto (2022-02-10 12:14:58+00:00): Hi, sorry for the late response. I meant to write "wall" but must have pressed Tab just before the word auto-completed. I'll rectify this situation as soon as I can. Thank you for the warning!
Warin61 (2022-01-25 23:56:14+00:00): Hi,
The changes made to Linha de Sena  train line in Mozambique have been reverted. I assume this was an error.
MacLondon (2022-02-26 02:27:52+00:00): Hi,

"crossing=toucan" is not an approved tag for a crossing with traffic signals. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing?uselang=en-GB#Approved_tags

"toucan" is only valid as a value for "crossing_ref". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing_ref
user_5359 (2022-01-25 18:19:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-23 22:28:57+00:00): Descriptive names for pond and shed should also be removed.
Glassman (2022-01-26 00:50:56+00:00): I haven't done any seamap edits but would recommend you look at openseamap.org as well as on the wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Seamarks for any help you might need adding these features.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116566948
Allison P (2022-04-13 05:19:19+00:00): Please check the name on this bus stop https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9446277573
user_11609320 (2022-04-13 05:28:58+00:00): Sorry about that. When I copied and pasted from the live map, I didn't see it also included the map data instead of the name only.  Thanks Allison, for pointing it out.
PabloGAMES (2022-01-26 13:50:51+00:00): xd
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-28 23:18:10+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=cakes
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9446296305/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=cake
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
user_5359 (2022-01-26 10:31:19+00:00): Helolo! Please explain the meaning of the keys used and why information without OSM meaning has been taken over. Other keys already have different OSM keys.
Allison P (2022-01-25 22:15:58+00:00): Being that Gem Prep Street is in Ada County, it has a predirectional, no? If not, I highly doubt it's a legal road and should be tagged highway=service.
h551w (2022-01-26 03:35:00+00:00): I was somewhat confused when I went by too, but it's got a green street sign that just says "Gem Prep St". I'm assuming it's either that's just what got approved somehow, or someone left off the predirectional when making the sign. Maybe it gets fixed when the neighborhood that'll connect to it finishes its roads, but for now that's what's on the ground 🤷‍♀️
Allison P (2022-01-26 04:14:51+00:00): https://apps.adacounty.id.gov/adafilebrowse/WebAppDocuments/Assessor/StreetNameFinal/Meridian/GemInnovationSchool_052120.pdf

According to the street name review, it was approved as West Gem Prep Street. That's very odd that the sign doesn't have a predirectional. All new signs are supposed to be required to have them.
h551w (2022-01-26 06:07:45+00:00): Weird, I wonder how that sign ended up like that then. I do think I prefer to have it the same as on the ground, even if it wasn't supposed to be like that, but I wouldn't be entirely opposed to having the predirectional added in OSM without it being on the sign since the sign might get fixed eventually
Tatfahren (2022-01-25 13:28:40+00:00): Bitte bei Fragen zu Straßen die Gesamte straße betrachten, z.B. bei der Braunsdorfer Straße gibt es nur im unteren teil laternen, wo du dann für die gesamte straße beleuchtung gekennzeichnet hast. In StreetComplete gibt es dazu die Möglichkeit unter weitere antworten --> entlang des weges unterschiedlich --> ok  , und dann die straße passend zu den unterschieden spalten. Danke
Tatfahren (2022-01-25 13:16:36+00:00): Dort sind teilweise Bürgersteige, teilweise nicht. Ich habe das nochmal entfernt, die Straße kann man dazu aufteilen.
Mundilfari (2022-01-28 02:53:28+00:00): Hey there - can you explain why the right turn was removed from the point in the middle of the intersection? The right turn traffic has to use the slip lane, and you can't (legally) turn right from the through lanes, no?
vrynkevich_lyft (2022-01-31 09:43:39+00:00): Hi, Mundilfari. 
My name is Veranika and I am a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you so much for paying attention to this.
According to OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction, there should be turn restrictions signs or traffic lights with direction arrows to prohibit turning. In this case, there are no such signs. But I agree with you, here the driver should use the at-grade connector to turn right. So I have added an implicit restriction of turning right in the changeset https://osmcha.org/changesets/116807798/. I apologize for any inconvenience. 


Thank you so much for your input in the OSM!
Best regards, Veranika
b-jazz (2022-01-28 06:24:56+00:00): The number of nodes in way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1024449202 is excessive. Can you reduce them to a reasonable number (in this ways and any similar ways you create)? Thanks.
b-jazz (2022-02-04 17:42:05+00:00): Thanks for simplifying!
mariotomo (2022-08-28 16:53:30+00:00): hola ovruni, qué te parece de participar a la conversa?
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-an-arch-symbolising-entry-to-area/2273
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
user_5359 (2022-01-27 07:54:32+00:00): Hallo! Meinst Du die Referenz Nummer von der World Database on Protected Areas? Schreibweise siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3AKey%3AWDPA_ID%3Aref
eggie (2022-01-25 08:39:49+00:00): Dag mihaak...  Zou het wellicht surface=fine_gravel kunnen zijn ipv gravel?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

Dan routeert het ook voor fietsers.
Echte gravel is niet te fietsen. 

MVG
eggie
danieldegroot2 (2022-01-25 10:02:07+00:00): Manually reverted removal of highway=secondary tag in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116577444
user_5359 (2022-01-25 18:05:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the position of your node!
eggie (2022-01-25 09:19:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Realiseer je dat elke toevoeging ook daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart komt. Wat is precies je bedoeling en loopt er daadwerkelijk een barrier=??   om het terrein en over de omliggende wegen en door het water? 
Kun je niet meer bij de GGD testlocatie komen? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-01-25 09:23:26+00:00): reverted by changeset  #116576022

Je edits zijn teruggedraaid. Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
trial (2026-02-01 21:06:13+00:00): 2 "26 Veitstraße", ein reicht, oder?
verset (2022-01-25 14:19:42+00:00): Добрий день
будьте ласкаві джерело виправлень name:pl
which is a source of correction name:pl
Murcik (2022-02-05 08:55:37+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Источником является пополняемый мною словарь, первоначально составленный по имевшимся в OSM name:pl.
DominikGM (2022-01-29 10:18:50+00:00): Hallo Andy,

du hast bei diesem Weg als Lieferzeitraum "Mo-Fr" angegeben: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112506899/

Auf dem Straßenschild steht "werktags": https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=534180147748218
D.h. in Deutschland "Mo.-Sa". Siehe z.B. https://www.adac.de/verkehr/recht/verkehrsvorschriften-deutschland/samstag-werktag/

Hast sich das inzwischen geändert (das Mapillary-Bild ist von Ende Okt. 2020).


Viele Grüße,

Dominik
AndySchulte (2022-01-31 14:15:11+00:00): Hallo Dominik,

vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
Ich habe es zu Mo-Sa angepasst

Gruß Andy
jeslop (2022-01-25 11:23:13+00:00): Hola Pepa López, bienvenida a OSM y gracias por colaborar.

Antes de seguir cartografiando te recomendaría leer esta guía de introducción:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

También puedes leer esto sobre los nombres:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones

Saludos.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
BCNorwich (2022-01-25 10:20:31+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you please say why you deleted the house? Has it been demolished something?

Regards Bernard.
DJA-Del (2022-01-25 10:33:14+00:00): Hi,
Deleted by accident, got called away while making an outline of the building on the sat. image.
I thought I was deleting my incompleted outline. I did not know you could delete building without a getting warning messages.
How do I reinstate the building?
BCNorwich (2022-01-25 13:09:36+00:00): Hi, It's not too easy to revert with the editor you used so I've reverted it for you using the JOSM editor. All now back as it was.

Regards Bernard.
paunofu (2022-08-05 16:20:52+00:00): Buenas tardes, 

Como lo comentado en el otro changeset no calques la huella del catastro sin comprobarlo en la imágenes aéreas. Las vías https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1024488682 y https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1024488681 no existen.
4004 (2022-01-30 23:39:16+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
поправлю только name:ru	Tsentr khoroshego slukha
4004 (2022-01-30 23:41:53+00:00): а, ну и субботу и вск перепутали, поправил тут, но остальные ваши точки не смотрел
danieldegroot2 (2022-01-25 10:05:28+00:00): This changeset manually reverts part of
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116572517
ivanatora (2022-01-25 15:54:32+00:00): Това няма ли да е по-добре с:
name=Глобалкар Toyota Стара Загора + name:en=Globalcar Toyota Stara Zagora вместо както е в момента на едно.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-01-26 07:25:10+00:00): Здравейте. Да, ще бъде по-добре. Благодаря за вашата бдителност. Приятен ден.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116577593
Kovoschiz (2022-01-25 12:48:18+00:00): Thank you, but you should add it separately. The road doesn't always pass through the highest point, or can change.
Warin61 (2022-01-25 23:50:21+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

One of the  relations had 2 outer ways - when one of them should be an inner. The other relation was done correctly. 

Both relations outer ways carried the same tags as the relation - this is a 'no no'. 
The tag area=yes is not normally required.

You will find the DCS imagery better in both resolution and location accuracy. 

These errors have been fixed.
Map345673 (2022-01-26 00:39:02+00:00): Thanks mate! This was my first time working with relations and I now know how to do it properly.

And yep the train line was a mistake.
Warin61 (2022-01-26 09:02:43+00:00): Ummm those are fairly simple relations. But good first steps. 
As 'a guide' 
ways should be limited to 2,000 nodes
relations limited to 300 members. 

So 300 ways of 2,000 nodes =600,000 nodes.. when you work on a large scale things can get messy really quick. 

Have fun, map what you like to see.
eggie (2022-01-25 11:28:24+00:00): Vast wel.. Even ctrl-f5 een paar keer. Je cache leegmaken.
gr eggie
literan (2022-01-25 17:10:55+00:00): на территориях школ уже стоят правильные теги, не стоит дублировать название на зданиях школ (тем более не полное название, а аббревиатуры)
trigpoint (2022-01-29 19:44:47+00:00): Hi, what is the source of this edit? 

Was this a recent survey?

The only reason I ask is that I have been meaning to update Carluccio's as it is now a different Italian restaurant.

Cheers Phil
Tim457 (2022-01-29 21:37:26+00:00): I haven't surveyed, I was just going on general knowledge. I know a number of their branches have closed recently, and I hadn't got round to checking if this was one of them
trigpoint (2022-01-30 13:59:24+00:00): I have updated the POI with its current name / fhrs / website.
Tim457 (2022-01-30 17:18:14+00:00): Great, thanks for clearing that up!
skyper (2022-01-26 17:10:42+00:00): Hi sbelemey
Please, be careful annd take a look at all involved relations, especially when using iD.
This CS corrupted the order of Bus 17_01. I already fixed it but the problems with iD persist. I recommand to use JOSM and its pt-assistant plugin.

Regards skyper
sbelemey (2022-01-27 13:58:44+00:00): hi, skyper!
thanks for your feedback and for your help. I'll be more careful with editing.

best regards, sbelemey
Lee Carré (2022-01-26 02:49:36+00:00): “parcel_pickup”

Thanks for the pointer which led me to amenity=parcel_locker . I'd been wanting to know how to tag such things which I had found locally, but didn't even know the name of them, let alone the tagging scheme.
Josef73 (2022-02-01 20:33:18+00:00): the tag opening_hours is wrong. Look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aopening_hours