piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
stevea (2023-02-26 21:52:03+00:00): I think Jamacho is "something" and may be a real place-name while also specifying something I recall from fifty-something years ago in my childhood with that as the name of the place, even though the road ends in an a.  I/we nearly always SAID it ending with an A because we were talking about the road, but I heard it with ending with an O, but rarely, as in "that place" (somewhat different than "the road with a similar name").

So, yeah, I think "ending in O" is a real thing.  It's very hard (for me) to say more precisely than I have as to where.

What this node seems to be describing is a "neighborhood" of San Diego (with a name ending in A, likely because the road nearby is also so named).  Like a puzzle piece bumped up against Lemon Grove and all kinds of history, it is "rather vague" though I suppose with care it's exact, oddly-shaped limits could be delineated.

But as it was hard enough to "place" a node for San Carlos (and I grew up there!) along with "what's Navajo? (as a neighborhood)" and having to figure all of that out.

This is a "neighborhood corner of the incorporated City of San Diego."  It already seems to have a surrounding landuse=residential for either "it" or "roughly" or "one lobe" of "it."  Centering its node around the intersection of Jamacha Road and Meadowbrook Drive, or a bit futher east towards Cardiff, but not "Skyline" because of the canyon south of Jamacha Road as an edge between the two.

It's really hard to translate "feeling about the center of a blobby-shaped corner neighborhood" into a well-centered single node.

San Diego might also consider what some places do, put a name=* tag on the surrounding landuse=residential.  That's a sort of "rough cut first draft" that isn't totally wrong, but I live in a city where these get refined down to exclude streets and other non-residential as "lots of smaller, accurate residential nuggets" and then the "wide area" polygon that used to be landuse=residential becomes place=neighborhood.  It's slow and deliberate, but it seems to be working.

Washington, DC is also converting from "node based neighborhoods" to the tags from the node being migrated to accurate polygons around each neighborhood, one by one.  Tedious, but the work gets done as it must.

We're going from step 1A to 1B (a vague node to a "better-centered" node).  Going to step 2 where it's all blobby-nice and refined to two levels of precise OSM tagging already specified, well, we have a ways to go.
stevea (2023-02-26 22:02:20+00:00): Here's what I consider.  I might trim the existing landuse=residential so it more accurately fits the "up to the edge of the San Diego City Limit" and migrate tags from this node to that polygon.

I might add in a second landuse=residential polygon just to the north (what got trimmed out as part of Lemon Grove), what's Lansing Drive north, around Montgomery Heights Elementary, effectively "seeding" landuse=residential polygon(ization) onto an edge of Lemon Grove.  It would have a fixme=* tag of "grows north towards Alton, Mount Vernon and Palm and west towards Lemon Grove Avenue").

We're going from chalk points to watercolor lines.  Sounds about right.

Do offer you opinion on this, as It looks to me like a fun 5-10 minute edit, a little chewy, a little crunchy.  Nice to get an edge a bit feathered better.
Kai Johnson (2023-02-26 22:02:23+00:00): I guess if you think that this node is referring to something different than the other Jamacha node, we should keep both of them. I don't have strong feelings about where the nodes should be located. But merging the tags into landuse=residential areas does make sense.
Kai Johnson (2023-02-26 22:05:01+00:00): Digging a bit more on "Jamacho," it seems that this was an alternate spelling. GNIS has historical records of "Jamacao," "Jamacha," and "Jamacho" all referring to the same Mexican land grant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rancho_Jamacha
stevea (2023-02-26 22:07:43+00:00): Yes, the "something different" is the residential area (now in OSM), I think it should have the tags of the node named Jamacha, as it is a "neighborhood of San Diego, roughly cut with this landuse=residential, which now contains tags identifying it as such."

And this can wobble, too, but maybe these get an admin_level=10 tag (below San Diego's admin_level=8), but you have to be a certain tall of height to ride that ride.  One thing at a time.

Someday this might blob into really accurate little blobs of suburbia with a surrounding polygon that exists about now/today, but it'll then get place=neighborhood with name=Jamacha on it.

Could take years, but that's OSM.

Mind if I "draw a fresher edge" around here?  Really, I think 10 minutes of "I got this" would be it.
stevea (2023-02-26 22:12:26+00:00): We crossed each other.

Um, yeah, now that you mention it, this is "a corner of" (a pretty complex one!) of that Mexican land grant.  The name gets mangled a lot.

I was once talking to a "411" operator and I almost knew the address she was going to give me was on Jamacha (pronounced in my ear as "hamma-shaw") Road and she gave me the digits of the address and there was a long pause and I could hear her brain gears turning but it was only silence.  I said "I think it is pronounced hamma-shaw, but it is spelled with a J."

YES! She screamed into my earhole with joy.
stevea (2023-02-26 22:26:26+00:00): So, this node, here, gets wrapped around the landuse=residential polygon, which is trimmed to fit into its corner of the San Diego city limit, excluding Lemon Grove areas.  I think that's right.

What I don't know about is the "other" Jamacha node, over by Steele Canyon / Cottonwood.

This whole thing is a mess, as you've obviously read the wikipedia article that talk about this being partitioned out of alleged confusion from the 19th century.

I think the node near Steele Canyon is "another" thing, a "place" which is called Jamacha, or maybe Jamacho.

We should do our best to get this as clearly-tagged as we can, although, obviously, there are challenges.  Glad to see we agree on "migrating the tags," I'll do that.

If you want to discuss about "the other node," we could here.
stevea (2023-02-26 22:50:16+00:00): OK, the "tag migration" and node deletion) inside of the city limits of San Diego is done (changeset/133061971).

As for the other node near Cottonwood, if you were to change its name to Jamacho, I would nod my head.
Kai Johnson (2023-02-27 00:43:41+00:00): Thanks for making the change! As for the other "Jamacha" over by Cottonwood, I'm pretty satisfied that it has the right name in the right place. There's some good documentation to support it, and I think I've seen signs while I was going by on Jamul Dr.

As for "Jamacho" it doesn't look like that name has been used for much more than the old Mexican land grant. There may still be some people around who use the name, but that old land grant has been sliced and diced enough that I wouldn't want to try to find a boundary or center for it. Anyway, that might be something for OHM rather than OSM.
stevea (2023-02-27 00:50:16+00:00): You and OSM are welcome.  In Hungarian "köszönjük (nekünk)" which is "thanks to us."  I like your call on the other node.  I'm smiling, I'm nodding, a wave and a handshake from here.
woodpeck (2017-05-15 06:41:13+00:00): I'm afraid this, again, is a change that breaks the map instead of improving it. I will revert your problematic edits now.
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:42:20+00:00): 
恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Polarbear-repair (2017-07-27 09:19:36+00:00): Please do not add temporary and perishable objects to OSM, such as the mushrooms you have found. 
This is against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features
Repaired in CS 50613552
mstriewe (2017-05-08 19:49:25+00:00): Hallo. Ich hatte vor zwei Tagen bereit ein Changeset kommentiert, aber bisher hast du nicht darauf reagiert. Auch in diesem Changeset sind dir wieder kleine Fehlerchen bei der Geometrie passiert, die zu Selbstüberschneidungen oder doppelten Segmenten in Wegen führen. Über den OSM Inspector sind diese leicht zu finden: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.01115&lat=51.44439&zoom=13

Ich empfehle dir, diese anzuschauen und zu korrigieren, um in Zukunft weitere Fehler zu vermeiden.
derpedde (2017-05-10 00:17:12+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
Werde mich am kommenden Wochenende darum kümmern.
Sorry für die Unannehmlichkeiten... :)
user_5359 (2017-05-07 07:21:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the shop https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3577145321? I have delete your entry, because it is a duplicate entry.
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:44:42+00:00): 
恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
trial (2017-10-17 18:46:20+00:00): Hallo, alle diese Namen (name=) sind eher Beschreibungen (description=), oder?
apm-wa (2018-04-07 13:40:57+00:00): Hi--there is no need to label POIs in all capital letters.  Also, the kindergartens and schools in this city seem to be named in Turkmen using the following scheme: 166-njy Çagalar Bagy, rather than Çagalar Bagy N166, or 12-nji Orta Mekdep rather than Orta Mekdep N12.
apm-wa (2018-04-07 13:52:50+00:00): Also, this is 106-njy Çagalar Bagy, not 166-njy.  In addition, the kindergarten grounds have already been tagged, so there is no need to tag the building as well.  That creates an unneeded duplicate entry. I have thus deleted the tags on the building since the grounds are already correctly tagged.
apm-wa (2018-04-08 09:56:57+00:00): I stand corrected, it is indeed 166-nji Çagalar Bagy, my apologies--I just drove there to confirm and have corrected the entry for the Kindergarten Grounds.
user_5359 (2017-05-07 07:37:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I did some changes to your modification: The traffic light isn’t a toursim attraction any more. Your second node with tourism attraction I move to the building with the same address. Please describe more details of the attraction (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction)
mavl (2018-12-25 20:05:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:45:21+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_3216889 (2017-05-07 13:27:14+00:00): Ter welkom een PB gestuurd.
chnav (2017-06-03 10:38:06+00:00): Hi, just wander why you have deleted highway=construction from A-2 roads. There is major re-construction ongoing and nothing wrong with construction tags, so I am setting them back.
Supaplex (2017-05-07 10:03:16+00:00): 其實不用刪除舊的建築，可以原先的建築新增點調整建築形狀
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:45:35+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Dalkvist (2017-05-11 09:03:56+00:00): Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre. 

Om du har några funderingar så får du gärna skicka ett meddelande till mig.
chnav (2017-05-09 09:29:01+00:00): Пожалуйста не делайте дубликаты объектов, все они уже были нарисованы ранее.
eggie (2017-05-07 14:27:31+00:00): John .. op een footway hoeft niet de tag foot=yes Dat is default. bicycle=no kan er ook af. Die routeren niet op wandelpaden.
0000FF berries (2017-05-07 22:25:57+00:00): hi :) While the key wood=* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wood is indeed deprecated, natural=wood is still valid as far as I know :) (I'll copy this to the rest  changesets too, sorry for the spam :) )
elgolfo (2017-05-07 13:14:17+00:00): Warum verschiebst du unmotiviert den Knoten Kaulsdorf(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1673625993). 
Stört es dich, dass man bei kleineren Zoomstufen die Kirche sondern Kaulsdorf sieht?
wbmstr (2017-05-07 13:17:27+00:00): wenn du mich so fragst, vielleich ein bisschen.
stört es dich denn anders herum?
elgolfo (2017-05-07 18:52:27+00:00): Naja, der Punkt ist immer: der Mapper vor dir hat einen bestimmten Grund gehabt, den Knoten genau dort zu positionieren. Vielleicht  gab es einen Datenimport aus einer externen Quelle oder er liegt genau am Schwerpunkt der Gemeindegrenzen o.ä.
Jetzt kommst du und verschiebst den Knoten damit es auf der Karte hübscher aussieht. Das ist Mappen/Taggen für den Renderer und bei OSM nicht erwünscht. Es geht nicht darum, dass es auf irgendeiner Karte hübsch aussieht, sondern die Realität widerspiegelt. 
Schau mal im Wiki dazu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Beim_Attributieren_nicht_danach_richten.2C_was_der_Renderer_daraus_macht
user_3216889 (2017-05-07 13:28:10+00:00): Ter welkom een PB gestuurd.
user_3216889 (2017-05-07 13:31:55+00:00): Het hele veld stond al als camping Weideblik aangegeven, dit is dus dubbelop.
Maps.me is niet de meest geschikt editor, controleer daarom zaken driedubbel.
Wijziging ongedaan gemaakt.
Aram Jamal (2017-05-07 10:01:53+00:00): SAFRA COMPANY
For General Trading , Frozen Food Technology
thomersch (2017-05-20 20:30:04+00:00): Darf ich fragen, warum Du meine Änderungen, die nach Änderung der Kreuzung vorgenommen wurden, verworfen hast?
pseudo-freak (2017-05-20 20:44:28+00:00): Ich habe nicht geschaut wer und wann die Kreuzung das letzte mal geändert wurde. Ich hatte nur festgestellt, dass die (durch vor kurzem erfolgte Baumaßnahmen) neu gestaltete Kreuzung nicht korrekt eingetragen war und die Kreuzung dementsprechend geändert.
user_3216889 (2017-05-07 14:03:26+00:00): Zeker weten? Filiaal staat nog gewoon op de website van Gall & Gall vermeld.
dgitto (2017-05-08 18:23:00+00:00): C'è una farmacia senza nome vicino piazza Pertini. Conosci il nome?
iCiccio (2017-05-12 07:04:38+00:00): Si, Farmacia "Bellini"
dgitto (2017-05-12 07:17:12+00:00): Nome inserito. Grazie
Øystein Bjørndal (2017-05-14 12:34:53+00:00): Vops, her har importen gått litt skeis og tatt med seg toget:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3131534725
rubund_import (2017-05-17 20:23:41+00:00): Lurer virkelig på hva som har fått noen til å flytte denne adressenoden inn i sporet for over et år siden. :)

Dette indikerer at jeg kanskje blir nødt til å legge inn en sjekk i scriptene for om nodene er del av veier..
user_3216889 (2017-05-07 13:39:35+00:00): Openingstijden graag aanpassen overeenkomstig http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
En voor telefoonnummer internationale notatie gebruiken: +31 20 etc
zstadler (2022-07-16 10:12:36+00:00): שלום דוד-צבי,

בעריכה זו התחלת למפות, בין השאר, את "הפטרול של יצהר".

נכון לעכשיו, הפטרול מאד שבור, כפי שאפשר לראות בתוצאות השאילתה הזו:

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1k9N

אולי תוכל להשלים את המיפוי?
user_3216889 (2017-05-07 13:53:54+00:00): Heb fitness gecombineerd met al aanwezige adresnode voor nr. 99.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-11-08 19:09:24+00:00): To jest niezła beszczelność wyzywać innych od wandali gdy się wstawia np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491888424/history

Jeden dom z 1852 punktów. Jeśli ktoś jest wandalem to ty, za wstawianie takich śmieci.
mbethke (2017-05-08 01:36:23+00:00): Some good additions there, thank you! :)
Just a note: if you create a building tagged with an amenity like for the Lao-Thai-Road market (I forget what it's called), you don't need to create an extra node for the same thing.
I just made some small changes: the marketplace building is a little smaller now than on the picture on BING, and I used JOSM's "align in circle" to make the new roundabouts a tad rounder.

cheers,
Matthias
Beager (2017-05-08 02:08:23+00:00): Thanks for clarifying/fixing those things to the OSM standard.
I remember your points for future additions. :)
indigomc (2017-12-25 08:24:56+00:00): Does this relation have a purpose? Given the existence of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3303114 which is complete unlike this, it seems to me that it could be deleted. Or if it has another purpose it should be renamed accordingly.
Chetan_Gowda (2017-12-25 14:17:03+00:00): Indeed, the outer ring road is one of the important road in BLR and this is helpful for bus route. There are lot of buses go through everyday in this road. Pls refer this for info and viz http://sajjad.in/tag/bmtc/
indigomc (2017-12-25 17:34:43+00:00): Thank you for your reply. I'm still not clear what this is about. But that is probably because of my question being unclear (I assumed that the changeset referred to one relation only). I should have made it clear that I was talking about relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5881273 with name 'ORR", for which I cannot see a purpose. I can see a purpose for the full outer ring road relation referred to in my first comment however.
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-12 11:22:20+00:00): Is it  a bar or a brewery?
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-14 07:00:53+00:00): Further search shows it's kinda both.
bigbug21 (2017-05-07 21:53:00+00:00): Da stimmt was nicht: Das nun als 3607 bezeichnete Signal soll wohl ein Ks-Hauptsignal in nördlicher Richtung, als Zufahrtssicherungssignal, sein. Es ist jedoch als Ks-Vorsignal in südlicher Richtung getagged, so hatte ich es zumindest vor einem Vierteljahr vor Ort beobachtet. Das Signal, das du meinst, steht vermutlich in der Nähe und müsste zusätzlich erfasst werden.
RoterEmil (2017-05-08 07:20:40+00:00): Hallo 'LTruemper' und willkommen bei OSM, erfreulich, dass Du Daten bei OSM ergänzt :) Nur zwei kleine Anmerkungen: Öffnungszeiten werden nach einem genau Schema verzeichnet. Darüber informieren kannst Du Dich hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours und dieses Tool hilft ggf. auch: http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/. Außerdem war die PLZ geringfügig abweichend. Beides habe ich bereits korrigiert. Viel Spaß weiterhin bei OSM und schöne Grüße :)
Supaplex (2017-05-12 09:45:56+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
bigbug21 (2017-06-18 13:43:26+00:00): Danke für deine Ergänzungen. Der Barrierestatus sollte nicht in den Namen (Tag "name") mit aufgenommen werden, sondern in den dafür vorgesehenen Tags, beispielsweise "wheelchair" oder (für verbale Beschreibungen) "wheelchair:description:de".
GerdP (2017-08-22 08:15:26+00:00): Hi!
Please review way 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491894503
I guess it should be highway=path ?
Bing doesn't show anything here.
user_3216889 (2017-05-07 13:49:55+00:00): Ik zie dat je het grootste stuk Hassinkhofweg hebt verwijderd, zodat de gebouwen aldaar op nrs. 1 en 2 niet meer bereikbaar zijn. Dat kan vast niet de bedoeling wezen.
eggie (2017-05-07 14:11:37+00:00): PB gestuurd naar dzzls. Pas jij het even aan Henk?
user_3216889 (2017-05-07 15:17:01+00:00): Hassinkhofweg hersteld.
gerosm (2017-05-08 06:51:15+00:00): Ein track mit width: 0.5 - da stimmt irgendwas nicht!
Jochen Topf (2017-05-08 07:27:17+00:00): The changeset comment suggests that this changeset is about the "Closed_ways_with_spikes" I created. But there are a lot of edits here that might be due to a misunderstanding. This challenge is not about turning circles or turning loops! I don't want to say anything about whether it is right or not to turn turning loops that are mapped in detail into single points, but it definitely hasn't anything to do with the challenge. Is there some misunderstanding about the purpose of the challenge here? Or is this some other mapping that was done without changing the changeset comment?
Patchi (2017-05-08 16:08:15+00:00): Hello Jochen, my mistake. And no there is no misunderstanding at all but a user (me) that changes the challenge without closing the old change set.
elgolfo (2017-05-07 13:08:26+00:00): Bei der Kirche: wieder aus building=church building=yes gemacht. Umriss ist laut Bing viel zu groß. Bitte ändere das.

Woher weißt du, dass die neuen Gebäude genau dort stehen?
Quellenangabe?
wbmstr (2017-05-07 13:15:38+00:00): Ich bin dort letzte woche gewesen, sind wahrscheinlich letztes jahr gebaut wurden
elgolfo (2017-05-07 13:27:16+00:00): Na wird doch langsam. Was hindert dich daran, dass gleich bei deinen Änderungen mit anzugeben?
wbmstr (2017-05-07 13:33:14+00:00): Man lernt dazu.... Hoffentlich wird es bald korrekt.
tdiesel (2017-05-11 23:26:25+00:00): Hi, ich bins nochmal. Hier liegt quasi der gleiche Fehler wie im anderen von mir kommentierten Changeset vor. Du hast die Rechtsabbieger-Spuren als extra Weg gemappt, da wo sie zusammen mit Geradeaus- und Linksabbieger-Spur noch ein Fahrweg sind. Getrennte Wege bitte erst dann verwenden, wenn sie sich auch baulich voneinander trennen. Diesen Teil deiner Änderungen würde ich wieder auf den usprünglichen Stand zurücksetzen.
Gruß tdiesel
bkil (2018-10-08 18:42:03+00:00): Hello, I see that you are using the free_refill=* key. Would you be interested in discussing a potentially improved tag for the same concept either on the mailing list or on the talk page of the wiki?
Thread starter:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-September/039520.html
Answers:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-October/039562.html
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Refilling_a_purchased_drink
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-09-17 07:37:52+00:00): 
Hi Oreg. I changed geometry of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/491897367). I also made some change around this changeset. Thankyou
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-23 09:43:36+00:00): Hi, Oreg. I have adjusted the tertiary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/491897368,

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/491897379,

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/491897377) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
SafwatHalaby (2017-05-07 13:17:08+00:00): Note there are two amenities with the same name, is that an accident? Also note: name:he shouldn't be English. Remove name:he if there's no Hebrew name.