piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Falsernet (2022-01-07 02:24:39+00:00): Yeah, it's probably worth bringing up. Must admit people have said I should use the mailing list for issues like this, but I haven't even tried to figure out how that works - probably worth a go at this point. Riding bikes on pavements being particularly contentious with a local mapper (living in Warrington); I'm of the mindset that bicycle=no on everything not explicitly a cycleway isn't the best approach.

I did notice that crossing seems much more common on ways than crossing_ref, unlike nodes. Also noteworthy that iD editor seems to endorse crossing over crossing_ref. (Yes I'm an iD pleb.) Plus personally I find traffic_signals to be redundant, as the crossing type indicates that anyway. (My understanding is that toucan, pelican, puffin, controlled are fully signal controlled, uncontrolled has traffic lights {or is part of a junction with them} but doesn't provide signals for pedestrians, and unmarked/marked aren't intended for signalled crossings.) Though foreign countries obviously don't have the same crossing types and rules; in NYC for example, marked is probably the most common tag for signal controlled crossings.

I would like to add that most of my interactions in changeset comments comprise of heated arguments over things like separately mapping cycleways as pavements, where people whine that it's an "integral part of the highway" and should be deleted in favour of tags, so an actual discussion of statistics and common practice has been refreshing lol.
Falsernet (2022-01-07 02:30:13+00:00): ^^^ Regarding riding on the pavement, it's been said on the Discord server that we should standardise a tag on the country boundary or something like that. Not an edit I feel comfortable making. In the meantime I've been using bicycle=dismount wherever riding isn't permitted.

In the future I'd like a routing interface that lets me override and route for riding along the pavement, because for some roads it's a bit suicidal to ride on the road. Plus it's not locally enforced afaik, especially with how copious our sometimes vaguely signed cycleways are.

Tl;dr: pavement cycling - hot topic.
do not bring quebec into this (2022-01-02 21:18:19+00:00): they also have a white "please drive slowly" sign earlier on the road lol
user_5359 (2022-01-03 08:10:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node over 100 meters, please check the position. See https://www.osm.org/node/9366608381
Antonino Ragona (2022-01-03 14:49:03+00:00): Grazie
MarcoR (2022-01-03 17:39:48+00:00): Figurati! Adesso se vuoi, puoi di nuovo mappare quello che avevi in mente nel gruppo di modifiche precedente.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
Patr1k_P (2022-05-18 12:34:01+00:00): Chodník na Rohov alebo Cestička na Rohov, preco tam su take nazvy? Su realne aj v terene? predpokladam ze nie, tak poprosim vymazat, opisne nazvy do osm nepatria
Patr1k_P (2022-05-23 08:50:35+00:00): gymko co tie nazvy?
gymko (2022-06-12 10:20:57+00:00): Veď už tam niesú
Patr1k_P (2022-06-12 10:26:32+00:00): lebo si to nebol schopny vymazat, tak som to urobil ja
gymko (2022-06-12 10:31:52+00:00): Aha, ospravedlňujem sa, prepáčte.
jpennycook (2022-01-02 22:08:48+00:00): More to follow another day, particularly with the pavement/shared use path/crossings
◪ Jarv (2022-01-03 20:10:19+00:00): I've ran some of your translations through a translator and whilst most of them make sense, The "东海岸线铁道" does not not mean "East Coastway Line", instead means "East Coast Line Railway". East Coastway is not the same as East Coast as the name of the railway line referrers to the line running East from Brighton along the Southern Coast, rather than a railway line running along the East Coast - such as the actual East Coast Main Line.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115687468
Arvind Kartik (2022-03-14 07:23:12+00:00): This change has broken the house addresses on the Rue de l'Abondance
Patr1k_P (2022-01-03 17:20:27+00:00): tato obec nema ulice, vtedy sa dava place...priklad ako to treba robit:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152485361
hezo (2022-01-03 18:44:17+00:00): dakujem, upravene
Eman_Mehrez (2022-01-03 09:14:11+00:00): Hello Sal73x,
I noticed you have changed the classification for "Coastal Road " but didn't change the links between for this way.
examples:-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577258657
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661685799
Could you change all links located in" Coastal Road "?

Regards
Eman_Mehrez
WoodWoseWulf (2022-01-03 00:54:03+00:00): Hi Bill,
Just wondering where the name Narara Airfield Loop comes from? I've never heard it called that before.
Is there new signage up there?
Bill Propert (2022-01-03 02:35:58+00:00): No, there is no signage there at all. Not any where around the airfield which I believe is local council land. This path/track however, is technically within the Strickland State Forest boundary but I suspect the path was made by mountain bike riders and so unofficial. There are numerous paths/tracks in the general area of similar origin but all quite well made and suitable for both foot and mountain bike traffic. The name "Narara Airfield Loop" was my choice pending an official naming which I suspect has a very low priority with State Forests. I am open to a more appropriate name.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-01-03 05:12:30+00:00): Hi Bill,
If the path is unnamed, it's perfectly fine to just leave it without a name at all.
I haven't been out that way for a good few months, I'll have to check the new path out soon.
Bill Propert (2022-01-03 11:35:37+00:00): Thanks. Do you think I should remove the name?
WoodWoseWulf (2022-01-05 19:42:58+00:00): Hi Bill,
If it's not a recognised name, then it's probably best just to leave the name tag off for now.
lonvia (2022-01-09 20:14:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9386783503 ist jetzt aber ein Duplikat von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8858607338 . Das geht auf keinen Fall. Einer von beiden muss wieder weg.
Das Mappen hier mit place=municipality für Roßleben-Wiehe und place=town für die Gemeindeteile Roßleben und Wiehe kann durchaus korrekt sein in OSM, wenn die Städte rein administrative Verbindungen bilden, kulturell aber noch klar getrennte Ortschaften bilden mit je einem eigenen Zentrum.
JausG2 (2022-01-09 21:17:41+00:00): Definitiv bilden beide Orte noch eigenständige Siedlungen aus. Die Markierung des Namens fehlt leider bei der Flächenmäßig eingetragenen Stadt. Allgemein fehlen Gebietsbezeichnungen bei OSM für große Landgemeinden. Beispielsweise wäre dann Hohenstein (Thüringen) und Werther auch "doppelt " vorhanden. Wiehe und Roßleben sind übrigens als suburb gekennzeichnet. Meinetwegen kann meine Kleinstadt Markierung von Roßleben-Wiehe wieder entfernt werden. Die Orte dann jedoch wieder als 2 eigene Städte zu kennzeichnen ist schlichtweg nicht richtig. Ähnlich wie bei Kindelbrück, welches den Stadtstatus 2019 im Zuge einer Gebietsreform verlor.
lonvia (2022-01-09 21:30:59+00:00): place=town ist eben nicht definiert als "hat Stadtstatus" sondern als "Siedlung von lokaler bis regionaler Bedeutung". Dass es keine Stadt im legalen/administrativen Sinne ist, bildet sich dann durch das admin_level an der boundary=administrative ab.
Aber ich will mich da gar nicht streiten, was richtiger ist. Das  place=town + place=suburb ist auch nicht wirklich falsch und kann ruhig so bleiben. Dann einfach Node 8858607338 löschen und alles ist wieder gut.
JausG2 (2022-01-09 23:48:24+00:00): Das mache ich jetzt mal.
Patr1k_P (2022-01-03 17:24:17+00:00): aj tu to treba opravit, niekde mas place aj street...v tomto pripade tu street nepatri
hezo (2022-01-03 18:43:42+00:00): upravene
kubahahaha (2022-01-03 21:53:23+00:00): W tym budynku jest czynna przychodnia? Można dodać takie tagi też oprócz nazwy
aweech (2022-01-08 15:50:01+00:00): I did the survey I wanted, and it left me more confused than before. I'm going to have to send a letter to NHDOT to tease this out.
literan (2022-01-04 13:50:15+00:00): нет, дело не в этом. В любом случае, не надо мапить под конкретный роутер, это запрещено правилами
SomeoneElse (2022-01-09 22:26:00+00:00): Hello,
You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017685511 here.  What was the source of this edit?  It's certainly not visible on Bing aerial imagery.
Best Regards
Andy
eggie (2022-01-03 09:54:17+00:00): Dag Teek...  Er lagen een aantal niet gesloten 'leisure=pitch 'op elkaar.
Die heb ik verwijderd. sport=field_hockey van het hek en het pad verwijderd.
sport=hockey op de pitch omgezet naar fieldhockey. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115689124


Gr eggie
eggie (2022-01-03 09:56:06+00:00): Mijn edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115702259
eggie (2022-01-03 09:56:51+00:00): typo  field_hockey
eggie (2022-01-03 06:46:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Wanneer Mussenberg ook in gebruik is kan deze als alt_name=  blijven.
Verder kennen we old_name=  
voor als de oude naam niet meer in gebruik is.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Rob Duchateau (2022-01-03 17:24:10+00:00): Hoi dank,

De Mussenberg ligt ergens anders. Fietshellingen naar een hoogte, zijn wat anders dan heuveltoppen. Ik geef het cluster beklimmingen een naam. Dat was toen de Mussenberg en dit was de zwaarste beklimming (heel Bottendaal 1 heuvel).
eggie (2022-01-03 17:37:15+00:00): Oke... Bedankt voor je reactie..
Mvg
Eggie
Violaine_Do (2022-12-06 19:40:54+00:00): attention aux restrictions de tourner, quand il y a des sens uniques il n'y pas besoin de doubler l'information.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115689252
sec147 (2022-01-02 23:46:46+00:00): Uploaded by mistake. Will revert tomorrow
eggie (2022-01-03 06:50:45+00:00): Wanneer Geitenberg de oudere naam is deze invoeren als old_name=  naast name=

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name

Dus niet verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
Map_HeRo (2025-02-25 20:30:13+00:00): Hallo, ich bin zufällig auf einige von Dir gemappte Hydranten gestoßen, denen Du sowohl Adressen (fire_hydrant:city/street/housenumber) als auch zusätzlich noch Namen (z.B. Kreuzung Steinweg - Schulstraße). Beides ist eher unüblich, da die "Adresse" aus der Position des Hydranten hervorgeht und Hydranten keine Namen haben. 
Die Namen sollten m.E. weg (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name).
Was ist denn der Grund für dieses ungewöhnliche Vorgehen?
Gruß Mikke
mdmoeller (2025-02-25 23:41:09+00:00): Die Namen sind zur schnellen Orientierung ergänzt um im Einsatzfall den Hydranten eindeutig benennen zu können
Map_HeRo (2025-02-26 22:50:33+00:00): Hmm, und wozu sollen dann die Adressangaben gut sein, wenn für das Auffinden ein "Name" vonnöten ist? Und warum hat nur ein Teil der Hydranten einen "Namen"? Werden die anderen auch ohne Namen gefunden? Und wie funktioniert das in all den Nachbarorten, wo die Hydranten weder eine Adresse noch einen Namen haben? Magst Du mal in das Forum schauen, da wurde dieses Thema unlängst ausführlich diskutiert: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/emergency-fire-hydrant-mit-name/98152
Die Namen sind keine Namen und sollten daher weg.
Gruß Mikke
eggie (2022-01-03 06:52:30+00:00): Nu staat er helemaal geen naam, meer.
Gebruik name= en alt-name= naast elkaar en old_name voor de historische naam.
Kijk je je edit nog even na?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-03 07:53:16+00:00): Je edits hier https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115689535
Geen naam?
Natfoot (2022-03-01 01:29:00+00:00): Hello, Suggest in future a comment on the change set rather than a fixme edit.  
Regards, Nat
aweech (2022-01-03 14:28:24+00:00): Hi,
Your edits in this area run afoul of OpenStreetMap's one feature, one element guideline. You combined the tags from three different features into one element, which means that the associated tags are all wrong now. As an example, the name of the stream running through Little Wild Horse Canyon is not "Little Wild Horse Canyon Trail". Also the name of Little Wild Horse Canyon is not "Little Wild Horse Canyon Trail". I'll be reverting these edits later today.
user_5359 (2022-01-03 08:01:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I completely reversed your change set.
mariotomo (2022-07-31 20:40:33+00:00): hola. ten en cuenta que toda la zona de Llano Bonito tiene como 20 intersecciones de "highway" sin punto en común, y 5 highway que terminan cerca de otra, sin conectarse. eso según JOSM que también utilizas para editar.
Gopnik McBlyat (2022-01-06 14:17:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
JJIglesias (2022-01-03 06:49:29+00:00): No se hacen Conjuntos de cambias a tanta distancia. Si editas en la Paz, salvas y subes lo que editaste, y luego abres otra edicion distinta en Ocobaya o donde vayas a editar. Pero mantienes los cambios en un area pequeña No a larga distancia
Владимир К (2022-02-17 16:10:17+00:00): на википедии написано, что Висимо-Уткинская узкоколейная железная дорога окончательно демонтирована в 2008 году. почему вы обозначили её, если её уже нет?
baumann3141 (2022-01-03 14:51:37+00:00): Thanks for correcting this!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115691810
baumann3141 (2022-01-03 14:51:07+00:00): Thank you for fixing this so quickly!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115692149
MxxCon (2022-01-03 04:21:22+00:00): Why did you redraw surf ave as a single road when it's clearly separated by a median? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway
Your change also messed up bus routes relations here.
This change was unnecessary...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115692217
brandonbds (2022-01-03 04:41:15+00:00): "Dual carriageways are not appropriate for roads that have no physical separation such as roads with single-marked centerlines, flush medians, channelized left turn lanes, or two way left turn lanes."

Surf Ave has flush medians and channelized left turn lanes, not physical separation, at least in the imagery I accessed. Is that not correct?
brandonbds (2022-01-03 04:56:35+00:00): I think I've corrected the bus routes, but let me know if I'm mistaken.
MxxCon (2022-01-03 08:23:33+00:00): There are physical barriers at W30th, W29th, W28th. Also I don't remember which block I saw them on, but there are plastic median sticks to prevent people cutting corners when turning.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115692217
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
Allison P (2022-01-04 06:32:50+00:00): Turns out the plat was recorded in December, but wasn't uploaded until the third. The roads were finished sometime in October or early November.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-01-03 07:02:04+00:00): Except Pagbilao bypass, just leave those bypass roads alone.
dasmarinas_mapper (2022-01-03 07:05:29+00:00): Please restore trunks to the bypasses/diversion roads for routing purposes.

While I agree that some bypasses may be over-the-top like the new one in Lipa, these bypasses in Quezon are actually quite straightforward and should remain trunks. 

The original components of AH26 should remain primary.
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-01-03 07:58:37+00:00): We can temporarily move the trunk back to via Pagbilao Poblacion as one mapper just updated its eastern leg that is still under construction as of December 2021, but for the rest, they can be reverted as these clearly superseded the older Poblacion routings of Maharlika Highway even though they would involve abrupt turn. 

On the bypass of JP Laurel in Lipa, that can get primary at most. Its ultimate purpose is to bypass congested JP Laurel at Marawoy, it looks more like a bypass to those coming from either Balete Road and JP Laurel (and vice versa, whether headed for STAR, Balete, LIMA or Lipa Downtown).
Violaine_Do (2022-12-06 19:47:18+00:00): Hello Manutea et bienvenue dans la carto OSM ;) Plusieurs bonnes pratiques, quand tu envoies tes données = mettre un commentaire plus explicite sur tes modifications (décalage des batiments par exemple) et 2 utiliser l'imagerie Maxar (plus récente) et la décaler sur les batis existants avant de commencer à mapper. Bon mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115695695
dasmarinas_mapper (2022-01-03 06:57:52+00:00): General Malvar Avenue is an original component of national primary route 4 before the construction of the bypass, and should therefore remain primary.
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-01-03 07:07:26+00:00): I would have to agree with this, Santo Tomas poblacion main roads being largely secondary and isn't much important as the newer Route 4 alignment. Will follow this up with downgrade to Governor Malvar to tertiary
DP24PH (2022-01-03 11:05:02+00:00): I'll say with this one since Gen. Malvar Avenue is technically in a Downtown/Bayan/Poblacion wherein it serves as a local traffic from the main PH-1/AH26 and PH-4/PJPLH. Further downgrades got applied on the subsequent changeset.
Violaine_Do (2022-12-06 19:48:33+00:00): l'interdiction de demi tour est implicite, il n'est pas utile de le mettre sur toutes les routes...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115696307
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-17 23:30:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118614062 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some implausible changes in Asia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118363386 .
tom_yorados (2022-01-04 19:39:31+00:00): Hi iWowik,

please keep your changesets local. Just split them up in smaller chunks.
Greetings
yorados
DUGA (2022-08-31 16:45:57+00:00): Please carefully check the map for golf course related editing.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1017754064#map=19/41.84276/-75.85922
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-17 23:30:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118614062 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some implausible changes in Asia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118363386 .
MapSpot (2024-12-20 14:46:10+00:00): Hello Amin,

I want to confirm whether the names of these cottage buildings refer to the buildings themselves or if these are the surnames of the occupants.

The latter scenario would raise some privacy concerns and is against OSM best practice, as this platform is not meant to contain personal non-professional data about people.
TheSwavu (2024-12-20 22:33:34+00:00): If these were the surnames' of the occupants, then it would be the greatest coincidence of all time.
Amin Fozdar (2024-12-21 10:37:47+00:00): Hi MapSpot,

No, they are NOT the surnames of the occupants. Did you even look into this before you commented? Those are the names of the buildings. Some heritage, some more recent. I will add the appropriate tags to make this clearer. Of course they aren't names of the people who were there. :D

Thanks,
Amin

P.S. TheSwavu 😂
MapSpot (2024-12-21 20:30:46+00:00): Gotcha. Sorry for the confusion. I'm not particularly familiar with this landmark. Rather, I've just been contributing to a global cleanup of the private=yes tag. But like to check in when I come across other things that look unusual.
TheSwavu (2024-12-21 22:24:23+00:00): @MapSpot to be fair the naming theme is *ludicrously* British.
ian727 (2022-10-25 10:26:34+00:00): Hi, ich habe gesehen, dass du diverse Wege in der Schönholzer Heide mit "bicycles=no" getaggt hast. Gibt's dafür eine rechtliche Grundlage oder worauf basiert das? Immerhin fahren da tagtäglich Leute auf Fahrrädern lang...
StefanHRT (2022-10-25 11:20:18+00:00): Hi,
Das Gelände unterliegt den Geschützten Grünanlagen und ist somit rechtlich geregelt. Ob die Leute dort neben den freigegebenen Wegen radeln ist deren Sache, offiziell gibt es nur die Wege mit Beschilderung (z.B. der Weg mit VZ 240)
ian727 (2022-10-25 11:39:25+00:00): Alles klar, danke!
StefanHRT (2022-10-25 11:54:39+00:00): Das gilt übrigens in Berlin für etwas mehr als 2000 Flächen, welche mit Tulpenschildern versehen sind und somit dem Gesetz unterliegen ;) (Parks, Spielplätze, Kleingartenanlagen etc).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-17 23:29:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118614062 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some implausible changes in Asia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118363386 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-17 23:30:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118614062 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some implausible changes in Asia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118363386 .
Palolo (2022-03-11 16:32:23+00:00): Abou,
Thank you for helping improve the road network in Tanzania. It appears that there was an issue with an import since many roads in this area have the key/value tag ref=T8 and surface=asphalt
Do you need help cleaning this up?
Samwel Kyando_Import Account (2022-03-14 07:43:19+00:00): YES !! Thank you palolo for the comment.

According to these road import projects The instruction before were insisting  on not changing or deleting  tag from pre existing community roads.
I think that's why our mappers didn't consider cleaning that up.

but in general those tag are wrongly added and i think will be perfectly fine if you help with the cleaning.

Appreciated 
Thanks.
Palolo (2022-03-15 00:48:39+00:00): These tags were not on the original features (2017), but were added in January 2022.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-17 23:30:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118614062 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some implausible changes in Asia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118363386 .
olo81 (2022-01-05 00:55:11+00:00): budynek już od dawna wyburzony!!!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-17 23:29:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118614062 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some implausible changes in Asia.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118363386 .
PT-53 (2022-01-04 07:36:42+00:00): Hallo mdieter,
im OSM-Inspector werden nach Deinen Bearbeitungen in Fußach 2 Hinweise auf "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.68375&lat=47.47744&zoom=15&opacity=0.34&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße und
ein Gutes Neues Jahr
mdieter (2022-01-04 09:52:11+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
danke für die Neujahrsgrüße und für die Hinweise, sorry da habe ich zwei mistakes eingebaut. Die neue Rheinbrücke mit der sich im Bau befindlichen Strassenumlegung ist eine äußerst komplexe Angelegenheit. Schöne Grüße von Dieter