piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
westnordost (2017-01-05 20:33:16+00:00): That is an interesting. Check my latest commit, I tried to represent what you wrote here. Explanation:
- the clinic is only part of the building, so I put it is a separate node (amenity=clinic or healthcare=clinic as for the new healthcare scheme) with religion=christian
- amenity=events_venue for the building
- highway=service + surface=unpaved for the driveway (highway=track is only for agricultural/forest roads)
- landuse=religious for the area + religion=christian since it is not a church but just "something" christian
BigBaka (2017-01-06 04:20:26+00:00): Hey, that looks great, and think it is much more accurately reflected the reality. I updated the name as Karunadaw is apparently one word meaning "Grace" or "Mercy" so you could say it is "Mercy Clinic" in English, but no body knows it as such and there are no English signs. 

By the way, do you know when OSM is going to get their image file updated, there are a ton of new developments going on in Yangon, that we can't even see on OSM. Must be years since the Yangon image has been updated.
R0bst3r (2015-11-17 12:53:37+00:00): Hi Alex,
kannst du dir nochmals die Relation anschauen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5424744. Hier wird z.B. ein Tag n=3 verwendet. Was war den beabsichtigt?
Supaplex (2015-10-11 15:08:22+00:00): 您好，你這次編輯，造成欣欣景福站發車的公車路線出現狀況了
應該是合併路徑造成的問題
我已經修復了
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34571100
之後如果有發現同路名的路徑被分成兩段，有可能是畫公車路線的關係而分成兩塊，還得請多留意了
愛兜風的貓 (2015-10-11 15:34:04+00:00): 這邊下交流道的路段原本就畫錯，所以我全砍掉重劃，不知有影響到公車路線感到抱歉
我還是新手，請問上次的修改所衍生的問題是有什麼要注意的
Supaplex (2015-10-09 14:49:14+00:00): The official name is "臺東線"
trigpoint (2015-10-09 10:53:36+00:00): Hi, you seem to have split Chipstead Valley Road at the railway bridge 'to improve routing'.
If your intention was to tag a height limit, then providing you have surveyed that please add the maxheight tag to the way.
trigpoint (2015-10-09 11:14:37+00:00): Sorry missed the height, looks ok
Hjart (2015-10-09 10:26:54+00:00): Det ser ud til at du har været uheldig at rode et par adressenoder sammen.
Hjart (2015-10-09 10:27:41+00:00): Se her http://osm.expandable.dk/osm/index.html
HvaHulen (2015-10-13 06:24:07+00:00): Jeg har ikke været opmærksom på at jeg har rodet i adresserne. Jeg vil frygtelig gerne rette op; men er ikke helt klar over hvor fejlen er. Orker du at præcisere det?
HvaHulen (2015-10-13 06:31:21+00:00): http://osm.expandable.dk/osm/index.html indeholder ej info om hvad der er sket for 4 dage siden.
Hjart (2015-10-13 06:36:11+00:00): Nej undskyld, man kan ikke længere se relevant info på det link, men på https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=34526467 kan du se hvad der sker. Læg mærke til Kongensvej 12 og Kronprinsensvej 4B.

Jeg vil lige prøve om jeg kan få dem tilbage på plads uden at revertere resten af rettesættet.
HvaHulen (2015-10-13 06:45:52+00:00): Ups. Jeg anede ikke, at jeg overhovedet havde rettet adresserne disse to steder. Takker for opmærksomheden og jeg håber at du lykkedes med at få rettet tilbage.
Hjart (2015-10-13 07:16:56+00:00): Whoops, det lykkedes :-). Jeg har for første gang brugt http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Level0 og tror jeg kan kalde mig ekspert nu :-)
SomeoneElse (2015-10-10 16:52:24+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.  What exactly is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374535450 ?  It doesn't seem to match anything on the ground.
imagico (2015-11-28 18:21:49+00:00): Hello bebbi,

you here removed the previous glacier mapping (together with changeset 34702512) and replaced it with an approximate mapping of the snow extent in Bing images - as it was already done in changeset 28662999.

My previous mapping was based on comparing various literature sources and photos in addition to the aerial imagery.  Could you please restore that - unless you have more accurate information on the actual glacier ice extent.
is-zUser (2015-11-09 22:21:08+00:00): "Anschreiben der Stadt Magdeburg mit Katasterkarte"
Liegt für die Nutzung der Datenquelle eine Genehmigung für OSM vor? Daten aus Schriftstücken und anderen Kartenmaterial kopieren geht aus copyright-Gründen nicht.
Marsuna (2017-09-18 08:31:09+00:00): Eine Genehmigung ist hier, wie auch den anderen Changesets, nicht nötig in meinen Augen, da es öffentlich zugängliche Informationen der Stadt Magdeburg waren, die Pläne entspringen einem konkreten Infoschreiben.

http://ratsinfo.magdeburg.de/infobi.asp
Dort stehen alle Infos für Bebauungspläne öffentlich.
Sanderd17 (2016-01-24 15:41:44+00:00): Hi, could you please drop by on the wiki and discuss if these buildings are related to the landuse import, or how you mapped them?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_imports/Cameroun_Ouest_region_buildings_import
is-zUser (2015-11-09 22:20:18+00:00): "Anschreiben der Stadt Magdeburg mit Katasterkarte"
Liegt für die Nutzung der Datenquelle eine Genehmigung für OSM vor? Daten aus Schriftstücken und anderen Kartenmaterial kopieren geht aus copyright-Gründen nicht.
AMDmi3 (2015-10-12 14:55:28+00:00): Зачем тут official_name? Пишите name полностью. Также см. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
is-zUser (2015-11-09 22:19:21+00:00): "Anschreiben der Stadt Magdeburg mit Katasterkarte"
Liegt für die Nutzung der Datenquelle eine Genehmigung für OSM vor? Daten aus Schriftstücken und anderen Kartenmaterial kopieren geht aus copyright-Gründen nicht.
Hjart (2015-10-09 15:20:47+00:00): Så vidt jeg kan se af http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapillary billederne er det ikke helt korrekt at tagge torvet som highway=residential.
Tom Thielemann (2015-10-10 07:44:35+00:00): Det er rettet nu
Vincent de Phily (2015-10-09 16:16:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM :)

If a shop is no longer open, it's better to replace the "shop=*" tag with the corresponding "disused:shop=*" tag, otherwise it's still interpreted as a shop by renderer and other consumers. It's not the only way to express this, but I won't confuse you with options :p See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix , You can drop the opening_hours and operator tag too.

I had a look at your other edits; all good :)
LornaBlake (2015-10-11 14:27:50+00:00): Thanks for the info! I'm just trying to learn how to get around and I wasn't sure whether i could change the tag! Thanks :)
Jahed (2015-10-10 02:29:57+00:00): is in barura
eggie (2020-05-28 07:53:38+00:00): Peerke..
Al weer een edit van lang geleden maar toch.. 
 Iets is pas een fietspad als het aangegeven is met een  bord G11, G13 of G12a 
Na jou heeft iemand dit weer hersteld. 
Waaruit maak je op dat de Industriestraat een fietspad is.
Het is uiteraard wel afgesloten voor auto's. Je kunt er niet eens door. 
We tweewielers en iemand die de sleutel heeft van de afsluitboom. 
Welk bord staat bij de afsluiting waar alleen tweewielers door kunnen?
MVG,
Eggie
trigpoint (2015-10-09 20:02:51+00:00): Hi
Its seems unlikely that the bridge is signed as 3.58m. It is more likely signed in feet and inches.
It is common practice in the UK to map what is on the sign, so I am assuming this should be mapped as maxheight=11'6", although you should map what you have observed rather than my calculation.
GerdP (2015-12-04 14:08:32+00:00): Hi there!
What was meant with surface=gr ?
gravel or ground both look plausible.
DaveF (2015-10-09 15:08:34+00:00): Please stop making erroneous edits
SomeoneElse (2015-10-10 15:50:13+00:00): @DaveF can you explain the problem here?  It just looks like a slip of the mouse has joined some ways together (entirely understandable for someone with only a few OSM edits) - or is there another problem?
jeka p (2016-11-26 16:24:32+00:00): Привіт!

заміть "будні" і "вихідні" треба вживати:
Mo. Tu, We, Th, Fr and Sa, Su

я виправив:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3529262866
більше інфо на сторінці:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Supaplex (2015-10-09 16:08:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34532961
我補上資料來源，記得要加上去
Polarbear (2015-11-12 15:23:02+00:00): Hi, die "addr:inclusion=potential" wurden aber nicht angefasst?
g0ldfish (2015-11-18 17:17:07+00:00): Nein, nur wie beschrieben.
DTHG (2015-10-10 19:31:50+00:00): What did you edit here? Your other edits have good comments can you please post a similar description for this edit?
Nakaner (2015-11-06 18:50:22+00:00): Revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35132811. Begründung siehe dort.
lubosb (2015-10-09 15:55:52+00:00): Ahoj aidamis,

vedel by si prosím špecifikovať, čo presne má reprezentovať tento bod? Nejakú pamätnú tabuľ, sochu alebo niečo podobné? Ak áno, tak prosím doplň nejaký tag..

Ďakujem
Nakaner (2015-11-06 18:51:33+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35132877, Begründung siehe dort
Ásmóðr (2015-10-09 15:57:30+00:00): Прошу прощения, накосячил. Как откатить, не знаю.
flohoff (2015-10-10 11:35:00+00:00): Hi,
leider hast du keinen changeset kommentar gesetzt so das ich erst suchen musste was du gemacht hast.

Flo
Nakaner (2015-10-09 18:01:54+00:00): Warum hast du von diesem Signal die Fähigkeit, dass es Zs 3 150 km/h anzeigen kann, entfernt?

Warst du vor Ort?
samely (2015-10-09 16:25:30+00:00): POI's were added.
M!dgard (2015-10-16 20:34:21+00:00): Dag albertino
In deze changeset heb je onder andere een klein deel van een oude spoorweg verwijderd. Onlangs is er hierover een zeer lange discussie gehouden op de mailinglists, en normaal houden we ze wel nog in OpenStreetMap.
Je hebt ook een footway en een path gemerged of zo, en door een rarigheid in iD wordt dat dan highway=path;footway, wat totaal ongewenst is.
Groeten, M!dgard
marc__marc (2022-09-29 07:07:45+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2317826018
can you review it ? it's a bench or a bank ?
Regards,
Marc
Nakaner (2015-10-11 08:32:18+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34564127
Nakaner (2015-10-11 08:32:03+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34564114
yuryleb (2016-05-16 09:34:54+00:00): Наверное, улица Ангама Атнабаева (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%90%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%B5%D0%B2,_%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B3%D0%B0%D0%BC_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87)?
AMDmi3 (2016-05-16 10:03:15+00:00): Я руководствуюсь следующим правилом: когда есть нескольких вариантов написания названия (например, несколько разных с адресных табличек + из КЛАДР) берётся самый подробный из них, но не подробнее. Соответственно, не вижу смысла писать здесь имя полностью, потому что такой вариант пока нигде не встретился.
yuryleb (2016-05-16 09:35:54+00:00): Наверное, улица Ирека Муксинова (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9C%D1%83%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2,_%D0%98%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA_%D0%A8%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%84%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87)?
flohoff (2015-10-11 12:50:53+00:00): Hu,
du hast in diesem Changeset das "wetland" gelöscht? Warum? Leider hast du wie eigentlich immer keinen Changeset kommentar eingegeben und das fängt mir an ziemlich auf die nerven zu gehen.

Flo
marczoutendijk (2021-12-08 19:28:27+00:00): Hi, 
for this way you have:
leisure=5572751
Can you remember what that means?
Marc.
kräckel (2021-12-09 16:33:14+00:00): Hi Marc,
thanks for your message to this incorrect entry.
Best regards Kräckel
Nakaner (2015-10-11 08:31:34+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34564043
maraf24 (2015-10-15 21:00:41+00:00): Ten zestaw rozwalił adresację większości budynków. Np. był taki adres:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2603930488/history
a teraz jest tam: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374606378
Polimerek (2015-10-16 08:09:44+00:00): Nie bardzo wiem o co chodzi. Adresy są tu przypisane do obrysów budynków, zgodnie z przyjętą konwencją w OSM. W EMuiIA punkty adresowe były bardzo niedokładnie zlokalizowane w Piotrkowie. Często są np. w osi dróg, wychodzą na chodniki, są przesunięte w stosunku do budynków czasem o ładne parę metrów itd..
maraf24 (2015-10-16 08:23:18+00:00): Adresy były prawidłowe. Jak je przypisałeś do budynków to się zmieniły na błędne.
Nie wiem jak robiłeś to przypisanie, że się zmieniły. Nie spotkałem się z czymś takim. Podałem Ci przykład, w pierwszym linku jest prawidłowy adres, w drugim zły.
Dotyczy to większości budynków, nie wszystkich.
Używałeś jakiejś wtyczki do przenoszenia adresów na obrys?
maraf24 (2015-10-16 08:39:22+00:00): Porównanie oficjalnych (niebieskie) z tymi co są teraz: http://postimg.org/image/8add4ql0v/
Polimerek (2015-10-16 12:35:20+00:00): Ach.. teraz już rozumiem - został odwrócony ich porządek. używałem terracera do tego, który to robi automatem i nie zauważyłem, że on obraca porządek numeracji... Możesz wskazać, w których jeszcze ciągach jest odwrócony porządek? To ogarnę to też terracerem - tylko powpisuję mu odwróconą odpowiednio numerację - bo ręcznie to ogarniać to będzie masakra...
d1g (2015-10-18 21:49:52+00:00): К этому дому был заказ как "Большая затонская" не так давно. Там нужно внимательно таблички посмотреть и спросить жильцов как улицы переименовывали.

Вот пакет правок 2 месяца до этого: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33118449
Майк Лазовски (2015-10-18 23:18:50+00:00): Возможно. Там в собственности мало у кого дома, те у кого есть св-ва о регистрации - основная адресация идёт как: поселок Затон, дом №.... По этому дому рег.палата могла присвоить: ул Большая Затонская, дом 569 ! Но в съёмках по земле в упр. архитектуры все дома идут как: поселок Затон, дом №....
wille (2015-10-19 12:16:36+00:00): Oi, Rodolfo

Quando uma instituição é composta de vários prédios, não é necessário adicionar o nome da instituição em todos os prédios. Basta que a área em torno dos prédios tenha o nome. Ter vários objetos com o mesmo nome torna a busca mais difícil.

Atenciosamente,
wille
Constable (2017-07-04 08:46:23+00:00): Ciao, per favore puoi dare un'occhiata a questa nota https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1050429 ?
Chiedo a te perché sembra che tu abbia aggiunto il sentiero e io non conosco la zona.
Grazie, ciao
Nakaner (2015-10-11 08:31:12+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34563959
Peter Dobratz (2016-10-15 21:18:36+00:00): It looks like there's some confusion with the changes you've made.  For bike lanes, rather than creating new Way objects with cycleway=lane tags, these tags should be added to the existing roads in OSM.  However, a lot of the existing roads in OSM already have this information tagged on them.  I can try to clean this up at some point.  Is there anything beside adding bike lane information that you are trying to accomplish with these changes?
Keith McKinnon (2016-10-17 15:18:05+00:00): No, I was simply trying to add bike lanes.  If you can clean this up, please do.

Thanks
Ryan_Peterson (2015-10-09 21:40:21+00:00): Hi Keith,

I noticed you're drawing in separate lanes for cycleways.  This isn't necessary as the center lines already have tags on them to show they include a bike lane(you'll also notice the center lines have purple markers on the sides indicating a bike lane as well in JOSM).  The only time you should draw in a separate way for a bike is if the lane is physically separate from the road.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
Keith McKinnon (2015-10-09 21:44:18+00:00): Thanks.  Now, is there a way for me to delete the extra lines I've made?
mstriewe (2015-10-26 19:06:06+00:00): Hi Keith, as you are using JOSM, there is indeed a simple way to do it in five steps: (1) Load the OSM data for your area in JOSM; (2) Open the changeset management (CTRL+ALT+C) and load the data of this changeset; (3) Hit the button on the lower part of the window to select the contents of your changeset in the main window; (4) Double-check that the elements selected are indeed the elements you want to delete; (5) Delete the selected elements and upload your change.
You should carefully do this for all the changesets in which you added unnecessary cycleways, as these changesets contain other problems as well: They have (all?) ways tagges with name=NULL and they use bicycle-tags with undocumented values that do not fit the meaning of the bicycle-tag as an indicator of access restrictions.
Nakaner (2015-10-11 08:30:48+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34563921
SK53 (2019-04-16 17:29:05+00:00): This way you created back in 2015 never got tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374624109. Is it perhaps a better outline of the perimeter of the castle site (currently the cliff lies within the perimeter)?
datendelphin (2019-04-16 17:53:20+00:00): I had to look at my photos from back then :) I would guess that way represents the crumbling castle wall. And I probably wanted to look up how to tag it properly and forgot.
user_5359 (2016-06-26 06:46:33+00:00): Hello! Are the streets have been built? Can we move the tag Name to the tag name?
mattmaxon (2016-07-02 15:10:39+00:00): No the roads have never been built. They are labeled as proposed because they are taken from planning documents from lacity planning department. Hopefully they will never be built
Carnildo (2016-07-04 02:23:39+00:00): The correct way to mark proposed roads is with the "proposed=residential" tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed).  There doesn't appear to be an easy way to do this with the iD editor, though.

Marking them as actual roads will lead to navigation software trying to route users down them ("In 300 feet, turn right onto Proposed").
RafalR (2016-05-16 13:33:10+00:00): Do oznaczania powierzchni służy tag surface!
YarNik (2015-11-25 17:39:06+00:00): странный фикс https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251001011
KKS (2015-11-25 18:12:09+00:00): да, херня якась.... з бінгу наче навіть там трохи асфальту є. Дивно. І тей острівок в дачках не чіпався. чого я його на track змінив - незнаю. Вже виправив на unclassified
YarNik (2015-11-26 07:56:22+00:00): Чудово, вірне рішення =)
marc__marc (2026-01-13 22:07:38+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2481566810
what's the meaning of note 	1920-2007 ? start_date end_date ?
is natural=fallen_tree a valid tag to describe it ?
Regards,
Marc
odna (2026-01-15 11:47:28+00:00): Hello Marc,
oh... that's a looong time ago. :-)

But yes, you are right! It is a big old tree lying on the ground. It is a kind of "attraction"... 
You can see some pictures of it here: https://www.komoot.com/de-de/highlight/896401
Is it art? It's definitly a fallen tree.

Greetings!
marc__marc (2026-01-15 12:07:11+00:00): thanks for the feedback and for adding a main tag
nice and funny item.
so maybe note=1920-2007 could be changed into
start_date=1920
end_date=2007
odna (2026-01-15 12:10:29+00:00): It is the start and end date of the "living" tree (You can see it on the photo with the yellow sign). But that means, that THIS "attraction" just started (!) 2007. So, maybe... it is better to delete those years and put it into some note tag...
marc__marc (2026-01-25 12:38:03+00:00): you 're right.
so we must use a lifecycle prefix. 
does this decribe it well ?
was:natural=tree
was:start_date=1920
way:end_date=2007 
natural=fallen_tree
website...
odna (2026-02-19 09:40:17+00:00): Hi Marc,
sorry for answering so late...

Yes, I think thats good!
Thank you for your help!

Greetings!
PT-53 (2016-09-06 06:51:33+00:00): Hallo ranger07,

im OSM-Inspector, View Taging, wird hier eine Fehlermeldung ways_without_tags angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.90943&lat=47.88176&zoom=17&opacity=0.34&overlays=nodes_with_empty_k,ways_with_empty_k,nodes_with_empty_v,ways_with_empty_v,node_tags_with_whitespace,way_tags_with_whitespace,misspelled_node_keys,misspelled_way_keys,node_with_unusual_char,way_with_unusual_char,node_with_short_or_long_key,way_with_short_or_long_key,unwayed_segments,ways_without_tags

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
EVGstreet (2015-10-15 06:25:44+00:00): 1. <http://www.karjalankartat.fi/> (!)
2. Контур - некорректный : нет 90 %  территории Питкярантского района ? !
wislander (2017-09-27 00:59:18+00:00): Has the east path been widened? When I was last on it in 2014, it was much too narrow and had too many steps to qualify as a track.
Warin61 (2018-08-17 05:17:12+00:00): Hi,
There is a mapper who thinks the cemetery is part of the Anthony Beale Reserve ..as near as I can make out from their mapping.
You may like to put your thoughts forwards on their changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61721512
Hjart (2015-10-10 09:50:06+00:00): Hej
Jeg kigger lige lidt på hvad du har lavet og har lavet bro over banen.

Er der forbindelse fra Danmarksvej til Dronning Sophies Allé?
Edelsborgvej munder ikke længere ud i Ladegårdsbakken?
Ifølge en artikel jeg fandt skulle Solgårdsvej være lukket ud mod Ladegårdsbakken?
Kan man passere over til det nordlige spor fra Thomas Helsteds Vej?
Bentriloquist (2015-10-10 11:33:23+00:00): Hej. Jeg vil prøve at besvare dine spørgsmål.
1) Nej, biler kan ikke køre fra Danmarksvej til Dronning Sophies Allé. Cykler kan passere, men det ser ud til at arbejdet med cykelpassagen ikke er 100% færdig. Der er pt afspærringsbånd for.
2) Korrekt. Beboere fra Edelsborgvej skal køre via Dronning Sophies Allé.
3) Det er rigtigt, det har jeg ikke fået med.
4) Jeg forstår ikke helt spørgsmålet, men mellem Dronning Sophies Allé, Ladegårdsbakken og Thomas Helsteds Vej er der etableret et lyskryds hvor man fra alle veje kan køre ligeud, eller dreje til højre eller venstre. I øvrigt ser det ud til at der i visse zoomlag mangler et stykke af Thomas Helsteds Vej. Hvis jeg zoomer ud, så er stykket der, men hvis jeg zoomer for langt ind, så forsvinder det. Ved du hvad der er gået galt?
Hjart (2015-10-10 12:01:53+00:00): At begynde med det sidste: De kort du normalt ser på nettet er sat sammen af utallige små kvadratiske billeder (på fagsprog "tiles"), der bliver "tegnet" og gemt i et lager af nogle store servere, et sæt for hvert zoomlag. Når der sker ændringer i de underliggende data (som du lige har ændret i) ,  skal disse "tiles" gentegnes og afhængigt af hvor travlt disse servere  har kan det tage lidt tid og man vil kunne opleve at tiles i forskellige zoomlag eller bare lige ved siden af hinanden ikke gentegnes lige hurtigt.
Hjart (2015-10-10 12:14:51+00:00): 4) Jeg har nu tilladt mig at føre Dronning Sophies Allé helt over til Ladegårdsbakkens sydlige spor. Jeg forstår det er korrekt?
Hvad med der hvor Thomas Helsteds Vej kommer ud overfor Edelsborgvej? Er der stadig et (T-)kryds?
Jeg har sat en noexit på enden af Edelsborgvej for at tydeliggøre at den faktisk ender blindt nu (og for at hindre falske fejlmeldinger på nogle af vores værktøjer).
Bentriloquist (2015-10-13 17:50:30+00:00): Ja, det ser rigtigt ud nu.
Hjart (2015-10-13 17:56:42+00:00): Ok, Du skal have tak for dine bidrag til vores projekt.
*Martin* (2017-01-31 14:02:05+00:00): Ahoj. Nechce sa ti to zmapovat podla https://www.tvkosice.sk/video/5890894f4526ca0abfb74780 ? :-)
ozDino (2017-01-31 14:28:28+00:00): Ahoj. Chystal som sa na to a dnes to nečakane otvorili. Urobím to :)
Commodoortje (2017-01-16 03:45:32+00:00): Hoi Fillifera,

Ik merk op dat je een voorstander bent om met ID te werken, hiermee gaat vermoedelijk gepaard dat je een voorstander bent om alles aan elkaar te plakken. Dit is zeer lastig om toekomstige edits (goed) te kunnen verrichten en zeker voor eventuele beginnende mappers. 
Ik zou willen vragen om van deze werkwijze af te willen stappen om zo begrip te krijgen voor de onstane situatie.
.
PS ik heb de JOSM validator gedraaid, en zie dat je zelf ook door de bomen het bos af en toe niet ziet omdat je vlakken als parkeerplaats aanmerkt, en daarnaast een node aanbrengt met de tagging als parkeerplaats. ééntje hiervan heb ik verholpen.
Ook een parkeerplaats waar overheen een area pedestrian heen ligt, kan in praktijk niet. Deze heb ik ook hersteld verdere edits laat ik over aan jou. Mocht je hulp nodig hebben ben ik (of andere mappers) bereid je te helpen.
Alvast dank hiervoor.
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-02-18 02:20:48+00:00): Hi totim,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/374675861) based on maxar premium.
Thank you, happy mapping!
tanonin (2024-06-02 12:32:52+00:00): Pourquoi avoir transformé la rue Jacques Tarade en rue jean tarade?
Denis_Helfer (2024-06-02 16:46:11+00:00): Bonjour,

Une simple erreur, désormais corrigée.
Merci pour la vigilance.
canfe (2019-04-12 12:16:36+00:00): L'azienda Agriflora ha unqa strada che attraversa l'edificio. Forse è da inserire un tunnel.