piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Max-Kritic (2022-12-06 15:06:44+00:00): Pour les lignes bus, j'utilise OSM Inspector pour avoir les way et les arrêts dans le bon ordre. voir ci-dessous

Artis a un plan dynamique avec les horaires. La VP en charge de la mobilité à la CUA est la présidente du Club des Villes Cyclables. Elle est pro pince roue et n'a pas ouverte le DSC devant les écoles de sa ville lorsqu'elle a mis la rue à sens unique.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=2.79571&lat=50.29600&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.98&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
ConsEbt (2022-12-06 10:03:11+00:00): I used a GPS track but the connecting areas as well as the platform in the middle are still FIXME.
lefuturiste (2023-05-07 17:48:40+00:00): Pourquoi avoir carthographier la zone autour de la gare de Val de Reuil comme zone résidentielle ? Il n'y a pas d'habitations, ce ne peut pas être catégorisé comme une zone résidentielle.
ivanbranco (2022-12-05 10:43:23+00:00): Ciao Erico, benvenuto su OSM,

c'è qualcosa che non torna. Hai sostituito il place "Case Basse" con una tenuta che ha come indirizzo proprio "Loc. Case Basse", mentre hai mappato un'altra attività ricettiva sempre chiamata "Tenuta La Santissima" avente come indirizzo "Loc. La Santissima".
Come mai?
save2desk (2022-12-08 05:27:48+00:00): Тропы есть и активно используются. Кроме того, на них уже стоял запрет доступа, а доступность в зимний период отмечается не удалением, а тэгом seasonal. И опять были удалены не только переходы, но и соседние тропы в лесу.
Вернул все удалённые тропы, поставил ещё одному переходу access=no.
save2desk (2022-12-08 04:44:56+00:00): Не согласен с удалением троп через ж/д, тем более, когда под удаление попали соседние тропы. Откатил, поставив переходам access=no.
save2desk (2022-12-08 07:34:55+00:00): В ПДД не удалось найти явного запрета на пересечение трамвайных путей при отсутствии в зоне видимости оборудванного перехода.
Поэтому вернул переход через трамвайные пути южнее рынка.
Piskvor (2022-12-05 11:17:12+00:00): Aha, díky, to s tím layerem mi nedošlo. Sleduješ to přes nějaký nástroj typu keepright?
Lukáš Jelínek (2022-12-05 20:39:14+00:00): Obvykle to řeším jen nahodile. Mám zapnuté kumulativní zobrazování chyb a když se mi v editoru při pohybu nějaké nahromadí, vyřeším je.
save2desk (2022-12-08 03:55:37+00:00): Ты издеваешься? Там бетонная лестница.
save2desk (2022-12-08 05:35:40+00:00): Откатил пакет. На случай недоступности путей зимой есть тэг seasonal=no_snow.
Правда, алгоритмы построения маршрутов его не используют, но это всё ещё лучше бездумного удаления всего подряд.
kkw02959 (2022-12-31 05:32:33+00:00): Где какие теги использовать не знаю, но сейчас зимой там не пройти не смотря на оборудованную лестницу в летний период
save2desk (2022-12-31 09:05:36+00:00): Нужно читать вики и форум, там есть ответы на почти любые вопросы по редактированию карты.
Дорожку можно было удалить, если бы на её месте появилась непреодолимая капитальная преграда вроде здания или бетонного забора, или если бы её точно никто не использовал ни сухим летом или по заморозкам пешком, ни зимой на лыжах.
mrpulley (2024-08-02 13:30:13+00:00): Ways 172300988 maxspeed correct (100) apart from eastern end (maxspeed 80). Ways 172300973, 172300966 are also maxspeed 80. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153204765
Maxspeed on Federal Highway is 110, so entry/exit ramps will also be 110 entering and leaving highway (ways 4734793, 21237597, 764315394). Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/154736933
Sutton Road is maxspeed 80, so adjacent entry/exit ramp for ways 20791675, 172300979, 723189631, 764315395 are correct (80).
coopercovelo (2022-12-05 01:56:22+00:00): https://clark.wa.gov/sites/default/files/dept/files/public-works/Parks/Legacy_Lands/Legacy_Lands_brochure%20rev%202018.pdf

This falls under section 4 of a conservation area.
coopercovelo (2022-12-05 18:08:44+00:00): There are several things all happening in this area. The restoration is on county owned Legacy Lands, and is part of the McCormick Creek Restoration project (Link Below), and is being performed by Clark PUD as I understand it.
from NW lacenter road, a path has formed, but crosses private property per the survey link below. technically this is not part of the restoration beyond this point for a little ways. The middle section is.
Last, the other end that was shown on private property was partially access for restoration on the south side of McCormick creek. The restoration efforts reach to the private property.
Also, this area of Legacy Lands falls under location 4 CONSERVATION AREAS on the last link below.

Once again, sorry for any confusion in the lack of documentation that was provided. I will add this to the history track with my other edits to help try and alleviate this.

https://gis.clark.wa.gov/PDFbuilder/tiff2pdf.aspx?doctype=survey&imageto=/bk19/19_02601

https://www.ezview.wa.gov/Portals/_1962/Documents/EastForkLewisRiver/fundedapplication_ClarkPUD_00160.pdf

https://clark.wa.gov/sites/default/files/dept/files/public-works/Parks/Legacy_Lands/Legacy_Lands_brochure%20rev%202018.pdf
save2desk (2022-12-08 06:35:06+00:00): Откатил. Внимательное чтение тэгов и поиск в гугле перед удалением могли бы подсказать, что станция не пассажирская, но не вымышленная.
kkw02959 (2022-12-31 05:31:55+00:00): Станции никогда не существовало ни в пассажирском, ни в грузовом исполнении. Вымышленный объект.
save2desk (2022-12-31 08:44:47+00:00): Одна из первых ссылок по запросу "назаровка пермь" выдаёт список связанных закупок:
"Предмет: оказание транспортных услуг при перевозке грузов (право пользования железнодорожными путями необщего пользования станция Курья - станция Назаровка и право пользования железнодорожными путями необщего пользования станции Назаровка)"
"Предмет: Оказание транспортных услуг при перевозке грузов (право пользования подъездными ж.д.путями ст. Назаровка)"
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-05 08:39:26+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
stlmapper74 (2022-12-05 23:37:05+00:00): Also please don't edit the whole world in a single changeset. Keep your edits confined to smaller local areas like metro areas. Thanks.
muchichka_s (2022-12-09 17:21:35+00:00): User randomly changed road levels. This should be reverted
map per (2023-01-04 16:40:02+00:00): REVERTED this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130874264
map per (2023-01-04 17:08:42+00:00): Hello TheSeamonster,

unfortunately I had to revert all your edits as you seemingly randomly changed road classifications. OpenStreetMaps (1) is a global Map database. Please don't vandalize it. 
How to properly classify roads can be found on (2).

regards
map per

(1) https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenStreetMap
(2) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
Dimitar155 (2022-12-10 15:29:16+00:00): Hello Unbeatable101,

Why did you change back the value of turn:lanes:both_ways of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1089701195 to reversible? It's clear from aerial imagery that this lane is for left turns only so turn:lanes:both_ways=left seems correct to me.

Best wishes,
Dimitar
Unbeatable101 (2022-12-10 19:04:23+00:00): Oh, I thought you had changed it turn:lanes:forward, looking at the wiki it seems I misunderstood the meaning of the reversible value, I'll change it back.
Dimitar155 (2022-12-10 19:13:37+00:00): Thanks!
AngocA (2023-01-09 17:32:51+00:00): Hola, hemos visto que has modificaciones en el área, pero nos gustaría aclarar ciertos elementos de este cambio. Para eso hemos creado un PoW: https://github.com/OSMLatam/pow/issues/10
MxxCon (2022-12-05 03:00:45+00:00): If citibike station is there, doesn't it mean that bikes are allowed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129722732
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-05 08:40:01+00:00): Hi.

Same again, could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
map per (2023-01-04 16:46:54+00:00): REVERTED this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130874599
cserpell (2022-12-05 15:10:49+00:00): Nota: Los muros fueron eliminados ya que en el lugar hay cercas muy pequeñas, y solo en algunos casos.
julcnx (2022-12-05 05:01:01+00:00): hi, thanks for your contributions! Do you mind next time to submit changes at country level so it’s easier to review them? Your changesets span over multiple countries. More info: More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129723099
Haris IRM-ED (2022-12-05 06:16:02+00:00): Hi cmoffroad,

I'm reviewing my work for the past 1 week, to reduce errors and warnings. Henceforth I will review per country.
Kovoschiz (2022-12-05 07:23:18+00:00): Please use `description=` for labels.
nevw (2022-12-07 00:59:50+00:00): Hi
the roads in to private properties are not tagged with highway=residential...they need to be changed to highway=service plus service=driveway
Do you want me to do it or are you able to do those for both your user names?
julcnx (2022-12-05 05:00:50+00:00): hi, thanks for your contributions! Do you mind next time to submit changes at country level so it’s easier to review them? Your changesets span over multiple countries. More info: More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129723736
kurisubrooks (2022-12-06 03:21:45+00:00): Hi Maradona11,
Thanks for your changes to Central Station. They're greatly appreciated.

I've been working on fixing up Central the past few weeks so I hope you've found the changes satisfactory.

With your changes however I did want to point out one thing, that being the escalators from Grand Concourse (east) down to the Eddy Avenue Pedestrian Area. Following a recent survey, around the same time of yours, these escalators were still in their original position and haven't appeared to have moved or been changed as you had altered in your changeset.

I've gone ahead and rectified this, as well as a few other minor fixes and realignments in my changeset here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129763067

Please let me know if you have any issues with any of my fixes.

Have a great day!
Chris.
Bienson (2022-12-05 07:25:29+00:00): Bei beiden Gebäudeteilen wieder die Adressen und die falschen building-Tags entfernt.
Bienson (2022-12-05 07:25:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129728954
julcnx (2022-12-05 05:00:44+00:00): hi, thanks for your contributions! Do you mind next time to submit changes at country level so it’s easier to review them? Your changesets span over multiple countries. More info: More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129724150
mrpulley (2026-02-28 06:02:00+00:00): Malpas Street (New England Highway) - previously surveyed as maxspeed 50, you changed to 70. Survey Nov 2025 confirms maxspeed is 50. Fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/176165200 (ways 98290444, 628566415, 762382437, 762382439, 762382441, 762382442, 762382443 already fixed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171386411). Other ways not checked.
julcnx (2022-12-05 05:00:33+00:00): hi, thanks for your contributions! Do you mind next time to submit changes at country level so it’s easier to review them? Your changesets span over multiple countries. More info: More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129724247
MxxCon (2022-12-07 00:45:54+00:00): Hello.
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it), it's not necessary to abbreviate place names. That article even explicitly gives an example of St. being ambiguous of Street or Saint.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129724385
user_17724595 (2022-12-07 22:55:38+00:00): Hello MxxCon,

I know about the documentation about not abbreviating names, and I try my best to follow it.

But, I think that St. is different and should not be spelled out as Saint. If you look at the cemetery's website, or at any street or place names on Wikipedia, or in any address anywhere, it will nearly always be written as St., and never Saint, even where everything else is spelled out.

I think I read something about how it's incorrect orthography to use the full word Saint in place names somewhere. Unfortunately, I don't remember what I read, and I don't think it will convince you anyway. 

I looked through the area on OpenStreetMap later and discovered that nearly all the major landmarks and place names have Saint spelled out since more than a decade ago. So, I suspect that you're not the only one who thinks that Saint should not be abbreviated.

In conclusion, I decided that I won't be changing any more Saint to St. in OSM anymore, but don't expect me to expand St to Saint (unless it means Street) either. 

I'm just going to leave all the names with Saint or St alone as they are.

Thank you reverting my changes for me and not making an issue out of it.
MxxCon (2022-12-08 00:18:05+00:00): A couple of things: while both wikipedia and OSM are community contributed projects, we have different rules and standards and needs. So on OSM we should be following OSM's norms, not wikipedia's. :)
As that article says, if a string/name is too long, for computers it's trivial to follow certain basic language rules to abbreviate words. However, certain words are impossible to accurately expand without human intervention.
It cost us nothing to expand abbreviated words and avoids potential confusion in the future.

OSM is a volunteer project so I can't force you to make edits you don't want. :) As long as they are not wrong, everybody is free to map what they want. Since you've been on a spree of adding wikidata/wikipedia links to features, it would be nice if when you come across such names to fix them, but it's your call.

Also there are some conversations going on of potentially in the future stop adding wikipedia links and only use wikidata since it's usually more specific, and if appropriate add wikipedia links into wikidata article..
Grass-snake (2024-07-01 02:21:29+00:00): Привет, извини что беспокою, вы уверены в наличии улицы в адресе на этих двух домах?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1111955243
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675288731
addr:street=улица Ленина
MxxCon (2022-12-07 00:49:26+00:00): Hello.
If this business is on Lex and E40th street, how come you positioned it on E181st street?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129724582
gscholz (2022-12-07 10:54:35+00:00): Hi Ronan_SV,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Sonsonate":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-89.72104&lat=13.72059&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129725872

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
silversurfer83 (2022-12-05 17:13:27+00:00): You've already been asked twice to please properly comment on your changes. Here's a handy guide on how to that:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thank you for your contributions to OSM and happy mapping :)
map per (2023-01-04 16:52:18+00:00): REVERTED this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130874794
jmapb (2023-04-08 19:05:38+00:00): Hello.. I'm curious about the grass landuse https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119519649

What's the source on this? It looks to me like it encompasses a service road, a small bit of woods, and people's private back yards. And it intersects with a few buildings as well.
pesec (2022-12-05 06:10:18+00:00): Добрый день.
Не нужно присваивать объектам неофициальные названия.
Данный пакет правок отменён.
Lostmonkey (2025-03-15 23:30:33+00:00): Er way:1119523723 en fejl? Ser udmiddelbart lidt malplaceret ud.
osmviborg (2025-03-16 07:10:36+00:00): Slettet.
aceman444 (2024-01-04 08:23:32+00:00): Zdravim, ta budova zvonku velmi nevyzera ako kostol, takze building=church je sporne. Alebo ste snad boli vovnutri (tak ako vsade po Slovensku)? Netreba vsade trieskat building=church len preto ze sa to vola alebo pouziva ako kostol. Rozlisujte stavbu budovy a jej vyuzitie.

Popis sady zmien tiez ziadna slava, nic nehovoriaci ako obycajne.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dobr%C3%A9_koment%C3%A1%C5%99e_sad_zm%C4%9Bn
jacobwhall (2022-12-05 06:40:19+00:00): ...Brookdale Assisted Living. This appears to have evolved into a mountain bike track, with little foot traffic anymore. It's unclear if bikes are allowed here, but I left the tag for now. Thanks to Alyssa for keeping me company today!
CurlingMan13 (2022-12-29 15:33:03+00:00): When is it supposed to reopen?  And will you be following up to "reopen" roads and ensure it isn't forgotten about?
ashybko_lyft (2022-12-30 10:06:10+00:00): Hi, CurlingMan13!

My name is Anna, and I'm Veranika's (vrynkevich_lyft) teammate. We are mappers on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for paying attention to our edits!

According to info from an official source indicated in the changeset comment, completion of the construction is scheduled for the third quarter of 2024. Our workflow is set up so that we are able to notice changes on high traffic roads in a timely manner.  So most likely our automatic pipeline will detect active GPS tracks here. With enough evidence, our team will restore the necessary tags on the road.

Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thank you for your contribution!

Best regards,
Anna
CurlingMan13 (2023-01-03 07:20:29+00:00): Anna,

Thanks for getting back to me and helping me understand better the workflow.  I wasn't aware that Lyft tracked closures AND openings.  Thanks for keeping track of it.  See you around the maps.

Best,
CurlingMan13
ivanbranco (2024-08-26 06:05:02+00:00): Hi KwaXoloXolo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119525239/history

building=industrialZondereindeZondereinde

what's the meaning of Zondereinde?
Tatfahren (2022-12-05 06:47:01+00:00): einer Dammlage aufgeschüttet wurde.
Tatfahren (2022-12-05 06:50:38+00:00): Da hab ich doch Glatt vergessen die review requested checkbox zu markieren...
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 10:31:16+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501588167/history has 2=9 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
user_3716049 (2023-01-09 19:36:58+00:00): Deine note hier, wäre laut wiki denke eher als comment dienlich gewesen ; )

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:comment
tux67 (2023-01-10 07:27:35+00:00): Stimmt - zumindest zusätzlich. Als note fand ich es weiterhin wichtig, um dieses Konstrukt zu erklären (welches nicht aus meiner Feder stammt)
abakus_uploader (2022-12-05 23:31:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
gosausee (2022-12-10 07:54:13+00:00): I reverted your change because you destroyed a new street and street connections.

May I ask you to check the local conditions before such actions.
Vika_Nosovich (2022-12-12 05:56:47+00:00): Hello  gosausee!

Thank you for your correction. I had images from OSM for mapping. Can you share some local features of mapping for Switzerland. I would be very grateful for information.

Best regards,
Vika
gosausee (2022-12-13 19:39:20+00:00): What kind of features do you expect?
Vika_Nosovich (2022-12-14 13:35:01+00:00): Hello! In particular about road mapping
mappOG (2022-12-05 17:42:55+00:00): Hello.. There's no need to repeat tags within one area. See OSM wiki for more information. One tag is enough
ualios (2022-12-11 16:38:27+00:00): ???
user_12500175 (2022-12-30 14:53:57+00:00): Hallo,
mir ist beim Editieren aufgefallen dass du z.B die Zugangswege zu Reihenhäusen als 
highway=service
service=driveway
mapps.
Allerdings sind die in den allermeisten Fällen nicht befahrbar, wären also 
highway=footway
z.B. hier gleich der erste1119532171, v1

Gruß
Danfost
habi (2025-01-31 09:32:05+00:00): Really?
NorthCrab (2022-12-05 08:18:02+00:00): Witaj,

Staraj się nie nadużywać klucza name=. Nazwą może być np. nazwa ulicy, nazwa sklepu, ale nie nazwa domu albo przejścia (chyba że jest jakaś tabliczka z nazwą). W skrócie: nie używamy nazw do opisywania obiektów - aplikacje nie będą w stanie ich przetłumaczyć, w pełni obsłużyć, i wprowadza to duplikację danych.

Więcej informacji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-05 08:20:38+00:00): Te budynki się na siebie nakładają: https://i.imgur.com/z5xgQ76.png

Trzeba to poprawić i usunąć klucz layer=1 (bo jest to bardziej zignorowanie błędu niż jego naprawienie).

W edytorze możesz prostować kąty w obiektach przy pomocy menu kontekstowego (prawy przycisk myszy) albo przy użyciu skrótu klawiszowego "Q".
NorthCrab (2022-12-12 04:58:13+00:00): Usunąłem potencjalną nazwę opisową bo nie odpisałeś.
motyla (2022-12-12 06:07:24+00:00): Ok, dzięki
drkt (2022-12-05 08:07:19+00:00): Jeg kan se at du har svaret på changeset/129593416 men du beskriver stadig ikke dine changesets. 
Jeg kan se at du bruger iD. Jeg har markeret med rødt hvos du skal skrive dine changeset comments, hvis det kunne hjælpe
https://u.drkt.eu/D48LDa.png
NorthCrab (2022-12-05 08:18:10+00:00): Witaj,

Staraj się nie nadużywać klucza name=. Nazwą może być np. nazwa ulicy, nazwa sklepu, ale nie nazwa domu albo przejścia (chyba że jest jakaś tabliczka z nazwą). W skrócie: nie używamy nazw do opisywania obiektów - aplikacje nie będą w stanie ich przetłumaczyć, w pełni obsłużyć, i wprowadza to duplikację danych.

Więcej informacji: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-12 04:59:15+00:00): Usunąłem tą nazwę opisową bo nie odpisałeś
motyla (2022-12-12 06:06:42+00:00): Dziękuję i przepraszam, ale uczę się jeszcze OSM :)