piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jillis inactivE (2022-07-07 19:33:11+00:00): I don't think you and your colleague did. This https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=108132.69390625&geometry.y=479430.04484375&zoomlevel=7&objectId=0394100000240265&detailsObjectId=0394100000240265 is what this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268043969 building should look like.
But leave it, please, And you better not map any buildings in The Netherlands anymore.
Jillis inactivE (2022-07-07 19:47:42+00:00): I've made a request to have the buildings here imported again from the BAG (the key register), that will fix them.
sbelemey (2022-07-11 10:16:45+00:00): Hello, Jillis E!
thanks for your help me in fix the buildings. And i will not to do mapping any buildings in The Netherlands.

Best regards,
Sergey
mariotomo (2022-06-29 14:27:53+00:00): please do accept help when editing bus routes. you have added as stop position a node at the end of the route, interrupting the otherwise correct segments sequence.

sería útil ponerse de acuerdo si estamos mapeando con puntos de parada o puntos de espera, en este país.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_position
mariotomo (2022-06-29 15:14:02+00:00): after a minimal check, i see that the sequence you defined is against the one-way restriction of the segments:
Way: Avenida Centenario (31573238)
Way: Vía Querévalo (1000388950)
Way: Vía Querévalo (1024390672)
mariotomo (2022-08-09 14:28:55+00:00): a week after my last hint, you again edited this route, without addressing the mistake. I would be glad to fix this, if I knew your intentions, but you apparently refuse to disclose them.
Alvarado2510 (2023-01-23 03:08:52+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=502991698496209

Buenas noches, uso esa foto para explicarte como son la gran mayoria de las paradas de autobus en el distrito de David, como puedes observar solo el letrero, no existe caseta o plataforma, tampoco un area donde el autobus se estacione.

El bus en estos punto se detiene en la vía, deteniendo el trafico para recoger o bajar los pasajeros.
Alvarado2510 (2023-01-23 03:20:16+00:00): Buenas noches, aqui otro ejemplo de parada sin caseta y area para el autobus:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=170566502033490
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:56:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
BJMTR (2022-06-29 15:36:46+00:00): 你对我的编辑（特别是车辆段）到底有什么看法，我这样的编辑有什么特别大的问题导致你要删去这么多的建筑？你知不知道带有上盖的车辆段内部还是有库房划分？你有没有实地考察，还是仅仅关注卫星图上的平面信息？
BJMTR (2022-06-29 15:44:16+00:00): 你甚至连绝大部分带上盖的车辆段位于地面都不知道，竟然写了tunnel=yes，而不是covered=yes。
BJMTR (2022-06-29 15:53:49+00:00): 我建议你多去看看，了解一下车辆段内部的结构，线路布置；我知道你对这方面比较感兴趣，并且刚开始涉及交通领域，我也希望你多去实地考察，查阅公示信息以及资料，千万不要想当然，要知道完善一个上盖车辆段的线路、厂房是十分不容易的。目前绝大部分的城市还只是用一条直线代替。
BJMTR (2022-06-29 15:59:58+00:00): 说实话你的改动对于整个地铁线网的完善没有任何意义
BJMTR (2022-06-29 16:02:20+00:00): 建议你补充完善一下7、8号线的线位及车站，这样你就可以体会到什么是有意义的修改。
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-01 08:37:13+00:00): @BJMTR

> 我这样的编辑有什么特别大的问题导致你要删去这么多的建筑？你知不知道带有上盖的车辆段内部还是有库房划分？

您好，它对于OSM来说应该是一个完整的建筑，建筑物内部的划分，您应该考虑采用三维建筑的形式或者建筑内部结构的形式来完善

可以到OSMWiki看一下S3DB/F3DB/Indoor相关的绘图标准，而不是把建筑物拆成一个个小的建筑物。

如果您找不到，我可以帮您找对应的文档链接
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-01 08:40:20+00:00): @BJMTR

> 你甚至连绝大部分带上盖的车辆段位于地面都不知道，竟然写了tunnel=yes

是，我承认tunnel=yes并不妥当，但是tunnel并非意味它一定是位于地下的，我觉得tunnel=building_passage是更为准确的用法，covered更接近开放式建筑上盖的场景（而显然车辆段不算开放式建筑，OSM的开放式建筑是凉亭之类的）。
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-01 08:43:15+00:00): @BJMTR

而且只要您打开OSMWiki看一眼您就会发现，在Key:covered里面加粗大字明确指出

For highways and railways this differs from tunnel=* in that it is usually open at least on one side. This then implies covered=yes. 

意思是说tunnel本身就暗示了这一定是covered的

我不知道到底谁才是需要多去看看，多去了解一下。为什么这么多人都对您有意见呢？

那接下来我们期待 @珊瑚宫心海/@和小吉祥草王贴贴 的7/8号线表演，我会去请大群里其他活跃贡献者都来参观和监督，看他的绘图是否质量合格。
hanchao (2022-07-01 14:53:59+00:00): @和小吉祥草王贴贴 大量删除别人的工作成果是不负责任的。意见有冲突可以多讨论，不要搞编辑战。

我的意见：
1.建筑物内部结构确实可参考S3DB/F3DB/Indoor
2.车辆段覆盖的地铁线路，tunnel还是covered我觉得需要讨论，至少我不确定
3.地铁名添没有确切的标准，加上“上行”“下行”更准确的方向是可行的。
真空中的球形猫 (2022-07-01 14:59:43+00:00): @hanchao

> 地铁的线路名称没有确切的标准

这话可不见得
PTv2是有建议的命名规范的，我记得中国社区也有七种常见的规范，都没有上下行的空间

加 note=上行 应该是最折中的做法


---

备注：真的有人觉得和BJMTR讨论能有结果吗？也不看看编辑战是谁跳起来的？我觉得现在的building:part确实是正确的。他其实也没删，就是building <-> building:part 之间来回摇摆罢了。
SNH48-林忆宁 (2022-07-01 15:03:05+00:00): @hanchao
1. 但是不包括通过违法途径获得的成果。部分车辆段内部信息无法通过公开资料获得，且就bjmtr言辞来看有擅闯车辆段进行非法测绘之嫌疑。
2. 上下行不应该放在name字段里，因为这并不是名称的一部分。并且考虑与同作为铁路的大铁的一致性，以线路名称作为name更合适且被大多数人接受。
hanchao (2022-07-01 15:43:20+00:00): @和小吉祥草王贴贴。非法测绘？您现在就在非法测绘。
@真空中的球形猫 不和BJMTR不讨论？那你直接给dwg举报他就好。
SNH48-林忆宁 (2022-07-01 15:48:26+00:00): @hanchao
噫，您不是也在吗。但是至少我们可没去实地搞捏。我可不希望杭州也出个喻学轩。
真空中的球形猫 (2022-07-01 15:54:10+00:00): @hanchao

我举报了啊，没用，Maps Man那种的我肯定也举办了，大陆的工单怕是压根不管？直接一个自动回复打发了，说明解决问题还得靠自己
hanchao (2022-07-01 15:55:03+00:00): @和小吉祥草王贴贴 我不否认，我是非法测绘。散了吧，多说无意
真空中的球形猫 (2022-07-01 15:55:32+00:00): @和小吉祥草王贴贴

如果是一般的配线是可以从一些公示上面获得的，但是如果是铁道内鬼直接闯车辆段里面去看布局，我只能说觉得这不好
hanchao (2022-07-01 15:56:18+00:00): @真空中的球形猫 别搞编辑战，言尽于此
真空中的球形猫 (2022-07-01 15:58:06+00:00): @上面两位

别打了，真非法测绘在座的一个也跑不掉。我觉得草王的意思，别整出个去禁区重地里面搞survey的铁败出来，因为那个“喻学轩”，搁当年叫爱好者，搁现在那绝对算“铁败”/“巴败”了，而且各地都有很出名的此类名人。
SNH48-林忆宁 (2022-07-01 16:03:04+00:00): @真空中的球形猫

我当时在#122832974的评论区里让他补上一些公示的链接，毕竟我也不确定我查不到的是不是真的没有。如果能找到公开来源那是皆大欢喜（
BJMTR (2022-07-02 13:00:08+00:00): http://zjjcmspublic.oss-cn-hangzhou-zwynet-d01-a.internet.cloud.zj.gov.cn/jcms_files/jcms1/web3390/site/picture/lslzfl/picture/old/644bedb5-bbbe-4e40-a863-7c12d0cfbffc.jpg
user_12500175 (2022-07-01 15:50:27+00:00): Ich denke der Bienenstock selber heißt nicht "Andreas Schelle Mering" sondern das ist der Betreiber- habs mal geändert
jotthaah (2022-07-02 06:33:00+00:00): Danke. Unterwegs am Handy tu ich mich schwer, die Tags zu finden...
Frans S (2022-07-10 13:30:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards. I reviewed quite a number of your changesets and my comment is valid for all of them
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123004450
Frans S (2022-07-10 13:33:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
I reviewed a number of your changesets. My comments is valid for most of them.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123004450
user_5359 (2022-07-02 05:09:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Niiepce (2022-07-01 14:41:10+00:00): Diese Anlaufstrecke ist kein highway=footway und ihr Name ist nicht "Anlaufstrecke zum Weitsprung". Achte auf die korrekte Verwendung des name-Tags. Ich habe es korrigiert. :)
LockOnGuy (2022-06-29 17:01:33+00:00): Hello again iriman, what is the source of node 9855827834? Regards.
iriman (2022-06-29 18:12:27+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy, 

This is a hussainiya, and in fact it is a building whose main function is to hold ceremonies in religious occasions, and it may have other public uses as well.
The hussainiya can be located inside the area related to a mosque and be part of the mosque buildings and may be built independently of any mosque.

To confirm this specific one, please have a look at this video:

https://youtu.be/SxBgtMdluXM?t=423

You can find "مطعم نسيم دجلة", and after camera turns, a little further on, you see a red building, which you can also find in the "Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta" imagery, and then on the left, the columns of the hussainiya building can be seen.

This video is really great and if you watch from the first minutes, it confirms name and other data I added to the feature.
LockOnGuy (2022-06-29 19:02:22+00:00): Hello Iriman, YouTube, Google Maps and any other services by Google is not an allowable source. Regards.        
https://www.openstreetmap.org/redactions/6        
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potential_Datasources
GerdP (2022-06-30 07:11:22+00:00): Moin,
bitte aufpassen, das tag ist de:strassenschluessel_exists (mit ue wie im Kommentar)
Strubbl (2022-06-29 17:54:07+00:00): Hello, it would be nice if you could use the lifecycle prefix in future. Please read more about it in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:
I restored the deleted POI and set it to disused. This way it is easier to re-enable the POI when a new shop or bank is in that building at the same address.
literan (2022-09-07 09:15:24+00:00): что-то я не уверен что эта ветка disused: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58228223

как тогда новые электрички из ДМЗ вывозят?
solenoid jam (2022-09-07 10:58:28+00:00): Я летом там проезжал на велосипеде, и ветка выглядела заброшенной, о чем я сделал заметку. Возможно предприятие не функционирует. Если у вас есть более достоверные данные, я не против их внесения.
solenoid jam (2022-09-07 11:08:27+00:00): Не исключено что ветка зарастает, и рельсы успевают заржаветь из за редкого использования. Или в этом году по неизвестным причинам производство остановлено.


https://nakarte.me/#m=17/55.79703/38.90855&l=S&n2=_g/g/55.797618/38.906750/274.3/-7.4/1.9

Сделайте как считаете нужным.
literan (2022-09-07 16:36:43+00:00): вовсю работает, вот например https://expert.ru/2022/04/15/rzhd-v-2022-godu-zakupyat-okolo-870-passazhirskikh-vagonov/

эти белые электрички именно там выпускают.

на панораме даже накат на рельсах виден - сверкает. Обычно они ржавеют за полгода ,если путь не используется
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:15:33+00:00): Hi,

the relation 12653660 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM will help you to prevent a new one, maybe you could update your software ?

Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:26:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
skyper (2022-08-16 14:09:26+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122963560
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
jqngarcia (2022-06-30 06:30:05+00:00): Bon dia Joan, manca l'etiqueta fitness_station, ja l'he modificat jo.

Salut i Mapes, JQN
rskedgell (2024-02-22 12:27:04+00:00): I see that you have changed the address of your business, but the POI is still located in Whitechapel High Street. Would you like it moved to a location which matches the new address?
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:14:17+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14307665 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM will help you to prevent a new one, maybe you could update your software ?

Best regards
wkdgs (2022-07-05 08:36:24+00:00): Hi,

da der Weg ja tatsächlich existiert sollte er nicht gelöscht werden. Stattdessen trage einfach die Zugangsbeschränkung z.B. mit "access=private" ein.

Kannst du den Weg wieder hinzufügen?

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123007824
Dodko (2022-06-29 18:49:28+00:00): tourism=guest_house už existuje na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2271451133 takže tento nový nadbytočný vymažem
ivanbranco (2022-06-30 11:10:48+00:00): Hi Masutani,

what are this kind of place=photospot you're adding, such as here?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9856016312
ivanbranco (2022-08-05 19:53:43+00:00): Hi, I see you're still active, any news? As it is now is something understable to you only, if I will not get a reply I will considere deleting them.
ivanbranco (2022-11-06 23:53:38+00:00): Hi, 4 months passed and no reply arrived, I deleted them in changeset/128574090
felipeeugenio (2022-06-29 18:47:38+00:00): Hola. El proyecto OSM no es para hacer pruebas. saludos
user_115918 (2022-08-05 22:46:13+00:00): There's a lot of issues in this change wwunjo. The border is a service road which crosses roads left and right. Not sure if this was part of the revert, but there's some serious cleanup that needs to be done here. Routing is probably busted in this city
wwunjo (2022-08-10 15:57:08+00:00): Timothy Smith thank you for paying attention to my edits, the revert was done, just because the edits of new mapper caused the road network issues, we are not able to fix all the issues but trying to solve the major ones. 
In the OSMcha you can see the features which were affected by revert (link) and features were modified by the new not experienced mapper.
Is there anything that was affected by these edits, I have to fix?
wwunjo (2022-08-10 15:57:57+00:00): Sorry, adding the links https://osmcha.org/changesets/122481550/
https://osmcha.org/changesets/123008285/
PH_ (2022-06-29 15:31:08+00:00): E adição e correções dos terminais rodoviários.
Frans S (2022-07-19 12:02:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123009030
user_2066394 (2022-06-30 09:52:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074557662
Das Haus hat keine Zufahrt mehr?
Mr_Neefs (2022-08-09 07:24:12+00:00): Beste Tom,
Ik ben niet overtuigd van het nut van het toevoegen van de oude voetwegen zoals in het molenveld te Humbeek, Grimbergen. Ondanks ze in theorie misschien nog zouden moeten bestaan, zijn deze al lang niet meer in gebruik en simpelweg niet te bespeuren in het landschap. Wat is uw mening hierover? Welke toegevoegde waarde hebben deze wegen volgens u?
Tom Ameye (2022-08-09 20:56:48+00:00): Dag Mr_Neefs, de criteria die ik hanteer om een trage weg al of niet op de kaart te plaatsen zijn de volgende:
•	Is de buurtweg of voetweg al of niet afgeschaft?
•	Zijn de perceelsgrenzen nog min of meer dezelfde als bij het opstellen van de Atlas der Buurtwegen.
•	Kansen op herstel, zelfs op lange termijn. 
Bij het karteren hou ik uiteraard rekening met de verleggingen en als de buurtweg of voetweg niet of moeilijk begaanbaar is, wordt die op access=no geplaatst, zodat 1) dit duidelijk wordt op de kaart en 2) programma’s die ook niet gaan gebruiken bij het berekenen van routes.
Dit is ook in lijn met de kaart van de trage wegen op de website van de vzw Trage Wegen.
Wat het specifiek geval van het Molenveld betreft: dat is heel groot en heeft heel wat trage wegen maar de meeste ervan zijn moeilijk bereikbaar omdat ze ofwel onrechtmatig omgeploegd worden of onrechtmatig afgesloten worden. De wegen errond (Kruisstraat, Molenstraat, Beigemsesteenweg) zijn onaangenaam. Er zou daar dus zeker wel terug een doorgang kunnen gecreëerd worden noord-zuid en oost-west. In Grimbergen vraagt het RUP HERBESTEMMING OPEN RUIMTE voetwegen te restaureren.
In Grimbergen zijn heel wat trage wegen (een 20-tal), die mits een kleine ingreep terug (volledig) begaanbaar kunnen gemaakt worden. Goed voor de onthaasting en ontsnippering ;-)
Becky Candy (2022-06-30 07:50:51+00:00): To ensure buildings/highways do not cross or connect, zoom right in and carefully place the building corners. If a road overlaps a building you should feel free to adjust the position of the road before mapping the building. Thank you for mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123009646
GinaroZ (2022-07-05 22:56:00+00:00): This doesn't look like a playground on Bing, have you actually surveyed it? (guessing you haven't)
archpdx (2022-07-02 20:19:18+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding this apartment complex. I've added it as its own point here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9862825384
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 18:39:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9856097742/history has shop = gate that was added in this edit
shop=gate ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
KAMI (2025-05-14 18:56:07+00:00): Hi,

As far as remember that was a shop to sell gates.
Not it seems a shop to sell car care stuffs.

I found them here:
https://www.carzoneshop.hu/uzletek
KAMI (2025-05-14 18:56:32+00:00): Not->Now
Jrachi (2024-08-23 15:42:06+00:00): Ciao.
Hai messi dei layer=-1 dove hai tracciato delle strade senza curare gli edifici mappati malissimo?
Frans S (2022-07-02 12:24:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
E: Rectangular buildings, not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.
A building can be recognized by the shadow it gives. No shadow= no building. 




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123010740
jqngarcia (2022-06-30 06:27:41+00:00): Bon dia, he modificat la teva edició, no hi ha dos carrers, sino que el carrer actual se ha de restringuir l'access i el peatons tenen preferencia.

Salut i Mapes, JQN
silversurfer83 (2022-06-30 08:21:23+00:00): Moin Rob,
ich hätte eine kleine Bitte an Dich: Deine Änderungskommentare sind ein bisschen Ausbaufähig. Besonders bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118294421 ist die bearbeitete Gegend so groß und die Anzahl der angefassten Wege und Punkte auch, dass man nicht nachvollziehen kann, was du getan hast.
Hier ist es schön übersichtlich, jedoch wäre ein anderer Satz schon hilfreicher :)
Vielleicht hilft dir diese Wikiseite:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Weiter frohes Mappen
silversurfer83
tordans (2022-06-30 04:47:33+00:00): Hallo! Ich denke, das müssen wir hier anders lösen. Die Stelle sollte als „Ort wo Bäume stehen können“ also „Baumscheibe“ und damit Platzhalter bis zur Neupflanzung dienen. Aber ich gehe davon aus, dass du nicht vor Ort einen neuen Baum gesehen hast, oder?
Viele Grüße und danke fürs Aufräumen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123012056
Supaplex030 (2022-06-30 11:37:59+00:00): Habe removed:natural=tree draus gemacht und die Baumscheibenflächen erstmal ignoriert.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-03 08:55:14+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9856210791/history has shop = tortilleria that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=tortilleria ? Should it be shop=tortilla proposed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:shop=tortilla ?

Is it amenity=fast_food or amenity=restaurant by any chance? Or are they selling pieces not ready to eat? Or ingredients? Maybe some https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine would be a good idea?
adrianojbr (2022-06-29 21:16:59+00:00): Olá, ProjetoMapeia!

Alerto para o cuidado necessário ao alinhar elementos exclusivamente por imagens de satélite, as quais são distorcidas já que são imagens em 2D de um mundo em 3D. No caso, específico, a ponte não faz curva, ela é reta, conforme pode ser constado nas camadas OpenStreetMap GPS Traces e Strava cycling and running heatmap.

Além disso, favor conferir o maxspeed:backward da linha 1074575902 que ficou com o valor "0". Também a linha 470063153 que ficou com tags conflitantes (maxspeed x maxspeed:backward).

Abraço!
adrianojbr (2022-06-29 21:29:26+00:00): Complementando, mais informações em: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
ProjetoMapeia (2022-06-30 11:27:02+00:00): Olá adrianojbr!
Obrigado pelo feedback, houve um erro de digitação, já vou corrigi-lo e verificar as tags conflitantes. 
Abraço!
willkmis (2022-06-29 18:38:33+00:00): Hello, it looks like you removed amenity=place_of_worship from this church, and added building=church. These two tags are not synonymous, as building=church indicates the building was built as a church, and amenity=place_of_worship indicates it functions as a current church. I am going to re-add these erroneously deleted tags.
theMETAVERSr (2022-06-29 18:41:28+00:00): gotcha... sorry. I was just there and they kept calling a house of worship because they host cross denominational studies too... thanks for the clarification.
Msiipola (2022-06-30 06:41:48+00:00): Hej!
Några synpunkter:
1. Hela byggnaden är felpositionerad. Den är förskjuten några meter åt väster och norr. Verkar som din bakgrundsbild inte är kalibrerad.
2. Jag tycker att namnet känns tveksamt. Heter hemmet officiellt som du skrivit ? (Almby på öster)