piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lodda (2020-06-07 17:27:56+00:00): Habe gelesen, dass man Wege, die nicht mehr begehbar sind wie hier die 2 Wege mit dissued markieren kann. Wird aber nicht in der Karte dargestellt. Der eine Weg ist mit herabgefallenen Bäumen auf längere Strecke blockiert, der andere ist stark zugewachsen.
Hast Du einen Tipp, wie ich diese Wege besser markieren kann?
mueschel (2020-06-07 17:30:42+00:00): Zunächst schreibt sich das Wort "disused" mit einem s. Und der Wert ist dann nicht "path", sondern "yes".

Generell ist diese Information nützlich - aber die OSM Datenbank enthält so viele Informationen, da ist es ganz normal, dass nicht alles auf der Karte dargestellt werden kann.
Lodda (2020-06-08 19:54:22+00:00): Danke!
Lodda
Piskvor (2020-11-11 16:48:42+00:00): Ne. Revert.
Glassman (2020-06-03 01:52:26+00:00): Please contact me about how to add businesses
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86094863
andrepoiy (2020-06-02 19:23:26+00:00): whoops I forgot to use my regular account for this...
glibbertorsten (2020-06-03 05:40:11+00:00): Nochmal Hallo! Wenn du den Namen der KGA weißt, dann trag ihn unbedingt noch mit ein - sind es wirklich 5 verschiedene Sparten oder ist es doch eine Kolonie mit ein paar Grünstreifen dazwischen? Du hast die beiden Nord-Süd-Zufahrten als privat gekennzeichnet, aber als track gelassen: das ist wahrscheinlich nicht korrekt. Wenn es eine Zufahrt ist, wo regelmäßig Leute zu ihren Grundstücken fahren, dann ist ein hw=service, egal wie schlecht die Straße ist. Das läßt sich dann mit surface, width und smoothness besser beschreiben.
Marmo4D (2020-06-04 06:28:49+00:00): Na du verfolgst mich wohl? ;) Danke für deine Anmerkungen, wenn ich demnächst wieder da bin, schaue ich mir das nochmal genau an. Sind glaube ich 2 Kolonien (aber jedenfalls nicht 5 wie aktuell gemappt). Mit den Tracks das lasse ich mir auch nochmal durch den Kopf gehen (schaue mir dazu auch nochmal die genaue Beschilderung dort an).
glibbertorsten (2020-06-04 08:07:12+00:00): Ich bin dein größter Fan, na klar!
RicoElectrico (2020-06-03 00:35:55+00:00): Cześć, dziękuję za wprowadzenie dodatkowe informacji do OpenStreetMap. Proszę natomiast o lepsze opisywanie zmian, zgodnie z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

W razie pytań co do edytowania OSM zapraszam na polskie forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23

Miłego mapowania!
heretofore (2023-05-25 18:16:01+00:00): Are they still here? The website lists a different address now.
LeTopographeFou (2023-05-28 19:31:35+00:00): I have no idea. The website now shows an address in Washington while their LinkedIn points to Alexandria. I think you can move this office to the Washington address.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-03 14:49:29+00:00): Kiedy te wulkany były ostatnio aktywne?
szydzio (2021-01-05 17:31:58+00:00): Tagowanie zmienione zgodnie z postem na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=813615#p813615
Nakaner-repair (2020-06-25 12:37:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87140679 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user Przem3ek because at least a large part of them are vandalism.
abakus_uploader (2020-06-02 22:31:46+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ralley (2022-10-05 05:08:19+00:00): Do you have a source for your change?  The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86095890
ralley (2022-10-05 05:11:23+00:00): Abovencomment wrongly made to V3 instead of V4
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86095890
bobbert123 (2020-12-09 22:09:01+00:00): dit is geen 'track' maar echt een voetpad, niet begaanbaar voor voertuigen. Ook erg modderig
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2020-06-03 08:36:25+00:00): Доборого дня. Будь ласка, поясніть, чому зміну класа дороги було скасовано.
Wulf4096 (2020-09-30 12:59:27+00:00): Hello,
looks like you created a duplicate.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6077645941 already existed.
fghj753 (2020-09-30 18:36:33+00:00): Merged this node with other and added more info based on taginfo. However, there's conflicting information on wikipedia regarding exact location. Added list of possible locations as fixme tag.
Marych_ (2020-06-03 08:23:40+00:00): Добрый день

почему вы все теги удалили?
Tatiana Yan (2020-06-03 09:51:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86085855 давайте в одном месте, по итогу если надо будет исправить, то я исправлю везде.
Marych_ (2020-06-06 19:47:29+00:00): там где были мультиполигоны - ладно

Но тут был простой полигон с которого снесли теги.
Tatiana Yan (2020-06-06 21:22:47+00:00): Тут насколько я вижу этот way тоже член мультиполигонального релейшена.

Можете объяснить чтобы я поняла что не так и больше не делала неправильно?
Есть relation типа мультиполигон:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4243816

в него эти два way входят как outer:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315435306
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/315416823

При этом деревня одна, значит place=hamlet должен быть проставлен в одном объекте (один объект в жизни -- один объект в ОСМ).

Если на самом деле это две разных деревни, то действительно нужно вернуть теги в way, но тогда нужно ещё удалить relation. Но если relation верный и деревня одна, хоть и мультиполигональная, то не понятно зачем каждый outer помечать как отдельный place.

Пример аналогичного объекта: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2807802 Это тоже неправильно и нужно в каждый outer вписать place=hamlet?
blackboxlogic (2020-06-07 21:48:58+00:00): Are you sure about the road name? I couldn't find any street signs but the business at the east end (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7367615870) has a website (https://www.mainewoodscompany.com/) which gives "Fish Lake Road" for their address.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86097852
blackboxlogic (2020-06-07 22:19:31+00:00): I just checked a data source I trust (from the state of maine government) and it stays this road is "Fish Lake Road" for way/173386358 and the east half of way/173386357. After that (westward) it agrees with the name you've given it. Do you have a data source, local knowledge, or maybe you found a street signs?
Jay at GaiaGPS (2020-06-07 23:44:05+00:00): Thanks, I have local knowledge as I drive the road frequently each Fall when I am in the area. The best source for road names in the North Maine Woods is the Delorme Gazeteer (a paper map) which everyone uses when in that area.
I plan on updating many of the road names in the area over the next few weeks, as I spend a lot of time in the area and would like to have updated road names when using OSM.
blackboxlogic (2020-06-08 01:52:24+00:00): Thanks for responding and clarifying local knowledge. Maine roads are pretty bad in OSM and I'm glad you're fixing street names.

I'm about to start working on roads also and I'm putting together some notes for myself (or anyone else). If you're interested in being part of a collaborative project aimed at improving routing in Maine, I'm looking for folks to work with, hoping the results might be more consistent if there is some communication between mappers.

For the record, the gazeteer would be problematic as a reference for copyright reasons. If this doesn't make sense let me know, I'm happy to clarify.

-Alex
user_5359 (2020-06-06 15:26:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags 
ARC_CODE=4
MINOR_NUM=412.0
MINOR_TOT=412
NAME=Dead Branch Brook
RESOLUTION=HIGH
SARISCODE=3211225.0
SARISNAME=DEAD BRANCH BROOK
SHAPE_LEN=294.119218229
SOURCE=USGS/MGIS
fid=3043
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-06-06 15:39:48+00:00): Greetings! Thanks for noticing! I've been adding streams for rivers in MA using the MassGIS data, but I usually add only names. Here, I must have missed it and added all these extra tags. I'll remove them (except name) as soon as I have a chance
clay_c (2020-06-02 23:10:19+00:00): Good work! Don't forget to change the from=* and to=* tags on the bus route to reflect what you've changed.
dead10ck (2020-06-02 23:12:32+00:00): Oh yeah, thanks for reminding me! Will do tonight.
eggie (2020-06-03 05:36:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Tip .. Een langsliggend voetpad kun je aangeven in de tags van het fietspad met sidewalk=right (of left)
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-03 05:38:43+00:00): Tip: De gebruikelijke tag is dan access=private
iandees (2020-06-02 21:57:39+00:00): Hello! It looks like you're trying to change the label for these train yards? If so, can you change the name on the existing train yard area, not add a new point? This will cause duplicate labels on the map.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86099041
KirkwoodJct (2020-06-03 00:52:15+00:00): Hey! I can change the names of the areas as well, but I add these points to allow for a rail-specific map (openrailwaymap.org) to prominently display this info. It is a bit redundant, but at the moment this is unfortunately the only way for this map to show location names.
iandees (2020-06-03 01:10:45+00:00): One of the tenets for OpenStreetMap is to not "tag for the renderer" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer). If OpenRailwayMap doesn't show the labels for an area, then please work to fix OpenRailwayMap's rendering and don't pollute OpenStreetMap with duplicate data that might confuse others.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86099041
KirkwoodJct (2020-06-03 03:00:08+00:00): My apologies if this caused any confusion. My goal is to better document the area for visiting railroad enthusiasts who use this map to pursue their hobby, not to pollute the map with unnecessary duplication of tags. My understanding was that tagging for specialist maps was acceptable and I apologize if adding this node didn’t fall within that guideline.
I thoroughly check my sources to ensure correct mapping data, and I will edit these points to clear up any redundancy while retaining the feature’s visibility as much as possible.
iandees (2020-06-03 03:03:00+00:00): Thank you for improving the map! One thing you could consider is to use a relation and make these points a "label" for the larger area. Normally that's used for administrative areas like cities and states, but it might work for this, too?
KirkwoodJct (2020-06-03 03:09:30+00:00): That might work. I’ll look into this more and edit the map accordingly. Thank you for the advice!
eggie (2020-06-03 05:40:52+00:00): Eigenlijk zijn bijna alle brandgangen in feite access=private. Dat voorkomt dat ze ongewenst gaan routeren. Een bordje verboden voor ruiters zal er vast niet staan.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-06-03 05:42:28+00:00): Je ziet beide tags.
Kort door de bocht. Staat er het blauwe ronde bord met de wandelaar of is het duidelijk voor voetgangers bedoeld dan footway.. in alle andere gevallen path. 
Gr Eggie
Woeper (2020-06-03 15:08:05+00:00): Dank, heb jouw opmerkingen verwerkt
lawrencebanks (2020-06-07 13:21:08+00:00): Has the whole central Bd. Republicii/Str. Sf. Ioan section been renamed, or just the central Bd. Republicii section?
Buraddo (2020-06-07 18:17:08+00:00): Yes, this one, and a lot of changes that I made before have been changed through HCL 239/2019 ( https://hcl.civicul.ro/view-hcl/hcl_238_23.04.2019 ), you can also see it appearing on the official list of street names: https://www.primariatm.ro/index.php?meniuId=1&viewCat=789 Changes on the ground will probably not appear soon as they have taken quite a long time in other cases
Frans S (2020-06-14 09:14:50+00:00): Hello. I was curious to see how your first mappings are.
We noticed that you are a new mapper and offer you some help to improve your mappings. New mappers often makes the same beginners errors, so we want to address them here. This is not criticising you, but offer help to improve your mapping skills.
You mapped rather oversized and not squared.
Please take a close look to the trace you want to map, here you mapped trees as well as a building
Be sure you see a rectangular, or round  trace (hut) 
On attached page you can see how you mapped and what i had to adjust.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=86617832
See the legend for more information
Best regards and keep mapping
marc__marc (2024-08-18 02:06:32+00:00): Bonjour,
je pense que tu devrais découper le parking Regard en 2 :
une partie en intérieur/souterrain et une partie en surface
la partie en intérieur pourrait avoir les noeuds 10-20 + à l'intérieur du batiment vu qu'on ne se gare pas dans les murs mitoyens et sa géométrie simplifiée (je pense au sud-ouest de la partie couvert:e est-ce que l'espace de parking utilisable fait réellement ce genre d'excroissance ? idem pour la partie à l'est de la partie couverte.
il y a aussi le batiment qui a été erronément changé en 3ieme parking https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038357451/history
Bon courage :)
pio2_122 (2020-06-03 07:29:42+00:00): Nie na darmo w tagach ulicy jest noname=yes... Ulica Jerzego Lechowskiego jest na innym odcinku zgodnie z Uchwałą Rady Miasta Nr XV/508/20.

Proszę nie mapuj w ciemno lub na podstawie nieoficjalnych źródeł.

Zmiana wycofana.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86099863
TheNet1996 (2020-06-03 05:26:33+00:00): Hallo T0Bi,
ich hätte eine kurze Frage bzw. Bitte:
Sofern diese Straße/Weg tatsächlich asphaltiert ist, dann stufe doch bitte den tracktype auf grade1 hoch.

Straße:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697005688

OSM-Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype?uselang=de

Danke :)

Viele Grüße
Mike
T0Bi (2020-06-03 17:53:40+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe den tracktype entsprechend angepasst
TheNet1996 (2020-06-03 18:06:31+00:00): Super! Danke und Grüße aus AUX :)
Frans S (2020-06-14 08:40:48+00:00): Hello William Thanks for mapping here
You are a new mapper I see.
Did you read the basics of mapping ?
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
A few remarks about your mapping here.
Buildings shows a black line next to it which proof it is above groundlevel and "thus" a building. Do not include that line in your mapping. If the object has 2 black lines on opposite sides it is probably a walled courtyard. No need to map them. 
You mapped 2 traces as a building which are none. No shadow.
Please square each building with the Q key in iD editor
Please pay also attention on the warning triangle on the right menu and try to solve the issues before uploading.
You had 4 warnings , not solved.
Anyhow, Best regards and keep mapping
notmyproblem1 (2025-09-06 16:53:40+00:00): Ciao Caro! Modificherò i nodi dei BIT Point presenti a La Spezia poichè si taggano con amenity=small_electric_vehicle_parking ([guarda wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsmall_electric_vehicle_parking) ) p.s.: questo messaggio sarà sia in privato che sul changeset.
SWF8 (2020-06-08 09:07:54+00:00): Hi Daniel,
may I ask, why you deleted your own railway line? It was very good an informative to see the future railway system of CZ.
Kind regards - SWF8
sovereign_ch (2020-06-02 23:37:45+00:00): Ein Handlanger, der um 00:38 Uhr lokaler Zeit fehlerhafte Tags einträgt? Ich habe ja kein Problem damit, dass man mich für einen Psychopathen hält, der selbst um 3 Uhr nachts noch editiert – aber das ist jetzt ein Bärendienst für die *Praxis". Ich führe die Konversation bewusst öffentlich, da der Hinweis auf das (selten so eindeutige) wiki und die zugrundeliegende Argumentation ignoriert werden – jetzt kann ich von bewusster Irreführung ausgehen. Phänomenaler Job, und alles wunderbar im Internet nachvollziehbar. *thumbs up*
eggie (2020-06-03 05:52:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
natural=grassland vind je in het buitengebied.
In bewoond gebied is het meestal landuse=grass.
Je zou ook eens bij leisure=garden kunnen kijken.
MVG,
Eggie
Adamant1 (2020-06-05 05:42:50+00:00): Probably a good call. I was going to do it myself  because it was in an odd spot, but I totally spaced it.
iandees (2020-06-03 01:07:29+00:00): Hi there! Can you describe why you prefer "abandoned"? The buildings here were definitely destroyed and are not abandoned.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86102339
brandonbds (2020-06-03 01:13:59+00:00): My understanding is that the prefix to building refers to the usage of the building, not the condition.
Abandoned is documented in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned.
Building condition is documented as building:condition:XXX
Destroyed=yes is not preferred: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:destroyed%3Dyes
BlaueBlüte (2020-06-04 11:08:21+00:00): In many, if not all, cases there was no destroyed=yes. Rather, lifecycle prefixes were used per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix to indicate the ‘status’ (in the wiki’s parlance) of the buildings and other objects. The above wiki page does concede that the “destroyed:” lifecycle prefix is “less commonly used”, but its definition “similar to demolished:, but destructed by any cause other than intentional demolition” makes it readily apply in these cases—contrary to the “abandoned:” prefix, which is defined as “still visible but fallen into serious disrepair and which could only be put back into operation with considerable effort”. Restoration of the “destroyed:” lifecycle prefixes would seem in order.
ralley (2020-06-03 01:28:58+00:00): Why have you changed the Hauraki Gulf from a Bay to a pedestrian highway?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86102461
CoyKoi (2020-06-03 11:50:52+00:00): Reverted with 86134424
marczoutendijk (2020-06-05 14:44:55+00:00): User blocked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3741

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
CoyKoi (2020-06-03 11:42:05+00:00): Reverted with Changeset 86133611
marczoutendijk (2020-06-05 14:44:40+00:00): User blocked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3741

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Supaplex (2020-06-18 17:23:18+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2020-06-03 04:54:14+00:00): Hi brucebruce, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting a completely mapped golf course of a different contributor? Thanks.

Also your changeset comment is somehow misleading here: "edit"?

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=86102806

#GolfMapping
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
srinatpa (2020-06-03 01:53:46+00:00): Comments correction : Added Maxweight for Uhlandstraße based on sign board in street view
user_5359 (2020-06-06 16:00:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags 
Año=2020
Longitud=1.2 Km
Tipo=Segregada
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
FabiolaCecilia (2020-06-09 02:18:06+00:00): La ciclovia segregada se inaguró en Marzo 2020, por el Honorable Ayuntamiento de Morelia.
ralley (2020-06-03 02:18:57+00:00): Why are you performing mass deletions and not using proper changeset comments as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments?  Please respond.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86103561
CoyKoi (2020-06-03 11:36:27+00:00): I have reverted this changeset, with #86133611
marczoutendijk (2020-06-05 14:44:43+00:00): User blocked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3741

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Supaplex (2020-06-03 04:46:57+00:00): Have you ever ask a  Philippines about their formal name:zh?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86104231
NM$L (2020-06-09 16:14:13+00:00): So can't others improve the translation in OSM?
NM$L (2020-06-09 16:15:28+00:00): It's a formal name:zh
ElliottPlack (2020-06-30 23:11:37+00:00): Hi there. It appears you've been working on updating the position of roads in this area. That is great work, but two requests. One, add a useful changeset comment saying what you're editing, not just something generic. No two changeset comments should be the same. More here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Second, once the roads are straightened/aligned, delete all the tags with the tiger:* key. specifically deleting tiger:reviewed=no lets people know that someone has reviewed the area. Thanks!
felipeeugenio (2025-03-11 12:16:01+00:00): eliminada
Arun Madhavan (2020-06-03 04:37:35+00:00): But how will you tell this is a stationary store ? DId you check if there is a preset/tag for that ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86104979
compdude (2020-06-28 22:23:13+00:00): Please be more careful when you are editing tags for existing roads. You changed part of SR 66 to service when it should be secondary.
rbhawa (2020-06-29 07:04:59+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit. Apologies for the incorrect edit, will ensure not to repeat such errors.

Regards,
rbhawa.