piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SimonPoole (2021-12-29 15:21:23+00:00): Partiality undone in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115524916#map=12/46.4007/9.7533
highflyer74 (2021-12-02 21:19:59+00:00): Referring to your previous change:

Please do not use a name, when something has no name.

The sanitary dump station certainly does not have the name "Camping car Park".

Thank you!
DAUPHIN84 (2021-12-05 20:10:04+00:00): Je voulais simplement dire que c'était à l'intérieur du site de Camping-car Park, et donc que c'est Camping-car Park qui s'en occupe.
Salutations
daganzdaanda (2021-12-06 22:42:46+00:00): Bonjour! 
Peut-être que la balise "operator=Camping Car Park" pourrait mieux décrire la chose?
Est-il possible d'ajouter "operator" avec Osmand?

Svp veuillez consulter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Name_est_juste_le_nom

Et si tu y es allé, tu pourrais peut-être ajouter le nom pour le camping? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/356921624
daganzdaanda (2021-12-06 22:48:46+00:00): Hm, maintenant il y a deux noeuds avec des sanitary_dump_stations:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9306835805
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9313224845
Est-ce correct? Ou est-ce le résultat d'une modification avec Osmand? Je ne sais pas si Osmand peut modifier ou supprimer des éléments existants.
daganzdaanda (2021-12-06 23:11:27+00:00): > Je voulais simplement dire que c'était à l'intérieur du site de Camping-car Park

Vous n'avez pas besoin de le dire explicitement. C'est déjà clair par la géométrie.
muralito (2021-12-05 00:30:27+00:00): Hola. Creo que la fuente esta equivocada. Avenida "del" Libertador es en Buenos Aires. Esta avenida de Montevideo nunca se llamo "del", a lo sumo Avenida Libertador.
MKnight (2021-12-03 08:44:31+00:00): Moin, sieht doch gut aus...
Hab noch fehlende Tags dazugetan.
MKnight (2021-12-03 08:46:13+00:00): Ah seh grad. hat noch wer anders Korrekturen zugefügt.
wkdgs (2021-12-06 13:49:07+00:00): Nochmal zur Info: Das OSM-Wiki oder das deutsche Forum helfen bei solchen Fragen oft weiter:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:junction%3Droundabout

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
A67-A67 (2021-12-02 17:35:44+00:00): Volgens mij heet deze verzorgingsplaats gewoon Labbegat. Het wegnummer is namelijk geen onderdeel van de naam.

Daarnaast zijn de parkeerplaatsen op de verzorgingsplaats zelf vrijwel altijd naamloos. In dat geval zou deze way dus geen name-tag moeten hebben.
JeroenvanderGun (2021-12-02 18:56:06+00:00): Over de name-tag van de verzorgingsplaats zijn we het eens:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669368846

Parkeerplaatsen binnen verzorgingsplaatsen met name-tag "<wegnummer> <verzorgingsplaats>" is volgens mij de meest gebruikelijke vorm binnen Nederland, naar analogie van "<merk> <wegnummer> <verzorgingsplaats>" voor tankstations, hoewel er inderdaad ook veel zonder name-tag zijn. Al komt dat laatste soms ook omdat het vaak niet één aaneengesloten parkeervlak is.
JeroenvanderGun (2021-12-02 22:33:57+00:00): Overigens kan wat meer standaardisatie van tagging van Nederlandse verzorgingsplaatsen geen kwaad. Naast name-tags van tankstations/parkeerplaatsen varieert bijv. ook gebruik van highway=motorway_junction (wanneer wel, wanneer niet, en wat te doen bij combinatie met afrit), wel/geen gebruik van stukjes highway=*_link tussen hoofdweg en verzorgingsplaats (snelwegen meestal wel, minder belangrijke wegen meestal niet), en gebruik van service=* tags op geen/sommige/alle wegen binnen de verzorgingsplaats.

Als je hier ideeën voor hebt, zou dat best een nuttige wiki-pagina kunnen worden.
A67-A67 (2021-12-03 09:35:54+00:00): Bij het tankstation zou ik aanhouden wat de uitbater als naam gebruikt. Het is hun tankstation, dus zij mogen de naam bepalen. De name-tag is niet bedoeld voor echte namen, niet voor zelfbedachte constructies van wegnummers en namen van verzorgingsplaatsen. 

De parkeerplaats heeft zover ik weet geen naam. Eerder heb ik bij verzorgingsplaatsen dit soort namen zelfs verwijderd en naar de (toen nog vaak ontbrekende) way met highway=services/rest_area verplaatst.
JeroenvanderGun (2021-12-03 13:34:10+00:00): Lijkt me prima, de parkeerplaats/tankstation en verzorgingsplaats zijn immers al ruimtelijk aan elkaar gekoppeld.
JeroenvanderGun (2021-12-03 13:38:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114491916
A67-A67 (2021-12-04 05:40:07+00:00): Bedankt!
Metoda (2021-12-02 23:15:38+00:00): The admin boundary https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/770670133 looks very much like a shifted variant of the Lukusuzi park boundary. Do you think they could be merged?
ftcat (2021-12-03 08:37:48+00:00): It is very likely as the boundaries tend to follow rivers as do parks. I am working to copies of the acts establishing the boundaries so better to leave it for now 'till I am sure. Unfortunately the writeup of the acts is not always clear
cyton (2021-12-03 05:18:28+00:00): Das Ding hat ne Adresse? Schau an
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114492460
user_53559 (2021-12-03 10:10:14+00:00): Ja, laut Brandenburgviewer: https://bb-viewer.geobasis-bb.de/?projection=EPSG:25833&center=385976.49219107995,5833099.931901161&zoom=14&bglayer=1&layers=19,25
pio2_122 (2021-12-02 18:50:59+00:00): Zmiana organizacji ruchu nie nastąpiła: https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=3017771048541196&id=1453995574918759
Fasha4 (2021-12-02 18:54:07+00:00): O, to nie zauważyłem, dzięki!
pio2_122 (2021-12-02 19:22:26+00:00): Rozumiem - nie wszędzie pojawiła się stosowna aktualizacja.

Aktualizacja pojawiła się na szczęście także na stronie GDDKiA o. Opole: https://www.gov.pl/web/gddkia-opole/zmiana-organizacji-ruchu-na-dk41-w-wierzbiecicach2. Zapewne będą pojawiać się tam też kolejne informacje na ten temat, więc warto ją obserwować :)

Na razie wycofałem więc tą zmianę.
20180911 (2021-12-07 09:20:12+00:00): Ce parc solaire n'a sûrement pas une capacité de 75000 MW = 75 GW. Peut-être s'agit-il de 75 MW ?
De plus, veuillez ajouter une source à vos changesets.
eggie (2021-12-02 18:26:35+00:00): OKe,,  Je hebt de oude situatie hersteld., maar nu klopt de afslagbeperking niet meer.
Je mag volgens mij niet rechtdoor komende van afrit 8
Ik kijk zo wel even. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-02 18:37:31+00:00): Afslagbeperking hersteld niet rechtdoor..
Je kunt dan niet vanaf de afrit weer rechtdoor de A20 op.

Klopt dat?
gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-02 18:40:05+00:00): Voorlopig de hele afslagbeperking verwijderd. Die klopte toch niet.
Zijn er afslagbeperkingen komende vanaf afrit 8?
eggie (2021-12-02 18:44:41+00:00): Nu zit 'niet rechtdoor' er goed in.
eggie (2021-12-02 22:04:14+00:00): Bij nader inzien turnrestictie verwijderd
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-03 08:45:02+00:00): Ciao. Non è corretto neanche wikidata=Q17405 perché anche questo elemento si riferisce a Morano sul Po. Ciao, Andrea
SHARCRASH (2021-12-02 18:17:44+00:00): Accidently uploaded without changing my comment, tags only added
Vinber-Pro (2021-12-20 07:32:21+00:00): Bonjour,
que veux dire AIT_2021 svp ? c'est seulement un mot clé, il est plus sympa d'ajouter un commentaire pour expliquer ce que vous avez fait svp ?

Bonne journée
Vinber-Pro (2021-12-20 07:35:00+00:00): et je découvre que vous débutez dans OSM et direct je pose des questions !

Donc tout d'abord bienvenue (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue) et si vous avez aussi des questions n'hésitez pas !

désolé pour l'ordre des messages, celui ci aurait eu sa place en premier :)

Bonne cartographie
user_2066394 (2021-12-04 22:49:23+00:00): Der Laden wurde erst im November eingetragen, wurde das Geschäft aufgegeben? Tags aktualisieren?
abakus_uploader (2021-12-02 23:31:04+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
GinaroZ (2021-12-09 13:45:02+00:00): Probably better to add individual nodes with highway=crossing+crossing=* rather than add crossing=* to the traffic lights, that way you can position them accurately and add details.
edircksen (2021-12-05 14:27:34+00:00): I eyeballed each one and changed the one at a time.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114494879
Hungerburg (2021-12-03 22:43:03+00:00): Hallo Higher Ground,

was ist denn die Quelle für das Gebiet? Am angeführten Ort finde ich nichts dazu.
HigherGround (2021-12-06 09:36:01+00:00): Hallo Hungerburg!
Die Quelle ist diese: https://data-tiris.opendata.arcgis.com/maps/tiris::wald-und-wildschutzzonen-1/about
Wie schon in vielen anderen Teilen Tirols durch andere OSM-User geschehen (siehe zB benachbartes Senderstal) finde ich es wichtig, dass alle diese Schutzzonen für Wald und Wild in OSM aufscheinen. Da ich neu bin bei OSM habe ich bis jetzt erst eine Fläche geschafft. Habe ich die Quelle mit dem Tag "source" nicht korrekt angegeben? Danke für Feedback!
Hungerburg (2021-12-06 20:12:13+00:00): Stimmt! Ich hab erst am 29. November das geojson geholt, da waren ein paar weniger drin als heut; Das ist offensichtlich im Aufbau begriffen. Auch die Verbreitungsbedingungen haben sich sehr zum Wohl der Allgemeinheit geändert!
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-03 09:59:13+00:00): Ciao. Alcune note. Innanzitutto, devi inserire dei commenti significativi ai changeset. "Sistemazioni" non fornisce alcuna informazione utile. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments Inoltre, ci sono dei problemi di etichettatura. Il vecchio ponte sul Chiusella ha dei tag errati. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379062091 Come puoi vedere sulla wiki non bisogna inserire i tag highway e bridge, che non si applicano alla struttura del ponte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man made=bridge La way che attraversa il ponte, ha un nome descrittivo e non un nome proprio e pertanto deve essere rimosso: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1008709744 Ciao, Andrea
Frans S (2022-05-25 13:07:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. (a bit late, sorry)
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.
I: Tagging of buildings. The standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings. do not add names etc to a building except when you have local knowlegde


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114495247
Dimitar155 (2021-12-07 13:23:55+00:00): Здравей vesanan,

Не е необходимо да изписвате "ул." пред името на улицата (виж https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bg:WikiProject_Bulgaria секция "Имена на улици и булеварди"). Ако имате някакви въпроси, на разположение съм.

Поздрави,
Димитър
Frans S (2021-12-07 11:36:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
You mapped multiple buildings as 1 building
Connected nodes of buildings to each other
Oversize buildings


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114495550
eggie (2021-12-02 21:31:38+00:00): Dag Simon..

Svp niet zaken dubbel vermelden. 
De Hervormde Kerk staat nu alleen nog op de gebouwomtrek. 

Kijk nog eens naar je edits 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-02 21:35:17+00:00): Je kunt deze 'tool' gebruiken voor de openingstijden. Dan krijg je wel de juiste format.
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Gr eggie
adrianojbr (2021-12-02 22:34:30+00:00): Olá, Ruan Álex! Primeiro uma sugestão: inclua em source:name=* os dados da (Lei n. XXX, de XX/XX/XXXX, p. ex.), a fim de facilitar a consulta por outros mapeadores.

Além disso, e o motivo principal do meu contato, tenha atenção ao mapear, pois indevidamente nessa changeset foram removidas os tipos das vias https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/105359060/ e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37739377, mas também foram removidas as etiquetas que definem como limite administrativo da relação de Juazeiro do Norte (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/302487).

Abraço.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114496569
Ruan Álex (2021-12-02 22:57:22+00:00): Muito obrigado pela sugestão! Claro, irei tomar mais cuidado ao realizar as edições. Mas que estranho, no momento em que realizei as edições, apenas acrescentei um novo campo de "nota" para adicionar o link da lei e mudei o nome de algumas ruas que estavam 
errados, fora isso não editei mais nada.
adrianojbr (2021-12-02 23:08:37+00:00): É raro, mas acontece sempre rsrs! Mas veja, houve alterações indevidas em Porto Alegre/RS, Unaí/MG, sendo que você estava editando principalmente em Juazeiro do Norte/CE. Não é normal acontecer uma alteração sem querer em locais tão distantes. Você não tem o perfil de destruir o mapa, então pode ser algum bug no editor iD.

Ao salvar, o iD faz uma checagem de possíveis erros e mostra alguns alertas; por favor, fique atento se aparece referente a algo que você não alterou. Caso positivo, você pode avisar do bug em https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues

Abraço.
Ruan Álex (2021-12-02 23:19:34+00:00): Pode deixar! Tenho certeza de que foi um bug. Quando estava editando, apareceram erros de ruas nas quais não são constituintes do bairro que realizei as alterações.

Vou reportar o bug, muito obrigado novamente! Abraço.
legofahrrad (2021-12-02 20:02:22+00:00): Quelle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2836007
laurent-38 (2021-12-03 08:32:00+00:00): Thanks for your fixes.

Please, in France, use BDOrtho IGN or OrthoHR imagery as the offset is smaller than Maxar. See for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=263616146#map=19/45.58603/5.19931

Another point : when a service way is connected to a building, it may be a parking entrance (eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66185884). In this case, IMHO, you should not disconnect the way, instead add a fixme on the node, it is probably missing the attribute  "parking=entrance".

cheers
~~
laurent-38
Theo Asselman (2021-12-03 09:50:26+00:00): Merci Laurent! I didn't realize that the 'ortho' images were better. (Although I still see some shifted houses.) 
I did try to determine if a way was just a driveway to a home or the entrance of a parking or even a 'tunnel' under a building to parkingplaces behind it. 
I'll will be taking more care in the future. Never to old to learn! (^_^) 
Merci again,
Theo
laurent-38 (2021-12-03 10:57:47+00:00): Yes, many houses are shifted because they were imported years ago from french cadastre, which is randomly shifted (and sometimes, some house  are mis-registred and not builded as planned). It would be a long job now to re-align all these building with recent imagery.

Mappers are welcome to fix building shape and position.

~~
laurent-38
Владимир К (2022-01-12 06:30:04+00:00): hi!
Why did you delete vehicle=destination?
RemyDog (2022-01-13 17:35:32+00:00): Hey Владимир К,
I see evidence at the north end of this stretch of highways in Mapillary, that the vehicle restrictions should actually be `hgv=destination` (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=505659454113036). The ground-level imagery I found at the south end is unfortunately very blurry, but I believe these two Mapillary images are indicating an HGV turn restriction (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=222395812841303) and some text clarifying the access restriction, which I cannot read (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=132756095591251). Are you aware of the specific details here? I get the sense `vehicle=destination` throughout this entire area is not quite correct.
Владимир К (2022-02-12 17:26:19+00:00): Agree. I deleted tag again
pyram (2021-12-24 14:13:49+00:00): Hier ist eine Frage gestellt worden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2973338
Das Museum wurde von Dir eingetragen, daher gehe ich davon aus, dass Du die Frage beantworten kannst. Wenn es nur Firmenintern ist, dann wäre mindestens "access=private" sinnvoll.
zluuzki (2021-12-31 18:28:41+00:00): Entfernt.
karson_ (2021-12-03 15:57:53+00:00): Did they actually change the name of the Recreation Building? I see https://www.facilities.uiowa.edu/building/0304 refers to it by the name you used. Other campus resources still list it as the Recreation Building. 

Having trained in the building for 5 years, it was always referred to as either "The Rec" or "The Recreation Building". Emails I receive which mention the building still refer to it as the The Recreation Building.

Yes, the building does have an indoor track as well as locker rooms for track/xc. The building also has the locker rooms for baseball/softball. And a weight room that is used by other teams. And an athletic training room. And an equipment room.
MMADDISON01 (2021-12-08 14:50:40+00:00): The official name has changed, the name will change in emails and other resources as those postings get updated.
Hungerburg (2021-12-02 21:09:46+00:00): Das Betreten von Wildruheflächen nach Tiroler Jagdgesetz ist nicht generell verboten, auch nicht im Winter. Vielmehr dürfen dort zu gewissen Zeiten Wege, Steige, Pisten usw. nicht verlassen werden. Der gesetzte access-Tag ist für diesen Anlass aus der Taufe gehoben worden.

Diese Überarbeitung will keine Aussage über Sinn oder Unsinn solcher Flächen treffen. Und schon gar nicht, ob die protect_class 4 hier richtig oder falsch ist.

Eine umfassende Untersuchung zur Überwinterung von Rotwild (in einem Tiroler Bezirk) siehe https://www.tirol.gv.at/fileadmin/bezirke-gemeinden/landeck/downloads/dokumente/Rotwild_Landeck_20210705_klein.pdf
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-03 09:32:39+00:00): Ciao. L'edificio mi sembrava posizionato meglio prima di questa modifica. Ora rispetto a varie ortofoto lo vedo spostato di quasi 4m. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114497968
TITOTITOTITO (2021-12-03 12:27:01+00:00): Ciao. Anche secondo me le mappe ESRI, Bing, dicono un' altra posizione. Quello che non riesco a vedere con ID sono le mappe PCN che solitamente sono precise. (un tempo si vedevano).
Lo spostamento l' ho fatto perchè il gps ripetutamente me lo dà spostato e la zona è abbastanza aperta..  Devo riallinearlo con ESRI?
Ciao
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-03 13:18:51+00:00): Ciao. Usando JOSM vedo che le ESRI (non Clarity) combaciano con le PCN 2006 e 2012. Userei una di queste per riallineare. Attenzione che anche il GPS ha un errore spesso non trascurabile. Ciao, Andrea
Scout Jens (2022-12-18 18:21:29+00:00): Hallo Thorben, gibt es da keinen Gehweg mehr? DE 240 nicht mehr da? - Auf dem Luftbild sieht das aus wie straßenseitiges Parken.
Grüße, Jens
mueschel (2021-12-05 09:58:11+00:00): Hi,
this note got a 'communication:5' tag - should that be "5G"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8758174469
Yurii Pylypenko (2021-12-05 10:01:54+00:00): some kind of typo or bug. fixed
Wilmer Osario (2021-12-03 20:51:26+00:00): Por favor no elimine la prioridad (highway=primary) de las carreteras que atraviesan el poblado
Kovoschiz (2021-12-03 04:28:33+00:00): What's wrong with it? Is it gone or something?
honeychuu (2021-12-03 20:15:59+00:00): I believe you are correct, it does still remain. I have undeleted the highway segment and added `vehicle=no` and `bicycle=no` tags to match the connecting service highways. Thanks for pointing this out!
DAUPHIN84 (2021-12-05 20:43:27+00:00): Bonjour , je ne comprends pas bien l'anglais , mais j'ai l'impression que vous avez éliminé plusieurs de mes contributions. Il m'a fallu beaucoup de temps pour les rédiger de façon précise , même si cela vous paraît insatisfaisant.
Je suis très étonné que la TOTALITÉ de mon travail ait été jugée mauvaise. Je me demande si votre décision ne résulte pas d'un mouvement d'humeur , et si c'est le cas je le regrette fortement . Salutations

P.s. : à qui puis-je m'adresser pour avoir un second avis sur mon travail ? Merci
daganzdaanda (2021-12-06 23:20:14+00:00): Je ne sais pas s'il était nécessaire de revenir complètement sur les 23 changements que vous avez effectués. Il semble qu'il y ait eu beaucoup de petites erreurs. 

Si vous voulez contacter la communauté francophone pour vous aider, allez peut-être sur https://forum.openstreetmap.fr ou https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=22.
(traduit avec deepl.com car mon français n'est pas assez bon)

I don't know if it was necessary to revert completey all the 23 changes you made. It looks as if there were a lot of small mistakes. 
If you want to contact the french-speaking community to help, maybe go to https://forum.openstreetmap.fr or https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=22
aTarom (2021-12-04 09:58:59+00:00): Hola banderas191, que te parecería colocar los nombres que utilizáis en el colectivo mtb en mtb:name en lugar del name?
mtb:name=Austin Powers
Es para mantener la base de datos lo más ordenada posible y así evitar confusiones con los name oficiales, locales, históricos...
Saludos
banderas191 (2021-12-04 12:05:35+00:00): ¡¡ Hola Tarom!! en primer lugar muchas gracias por la información y por explicarme cómo hacerlo correctamente. Llevo desde Junio de este año actualizando los mapas OSM y hay cosas que se me escapan. No sabía que había un apartado concreto para nombrar los senderos solo para MTB, y ni qué decir tiene que es lo lógico hacerlo así.

    Mañana Domingo me dedicaré a corregir los 20-25 senderos que he nombrado incorrectamente, pasándolos a mtb:name

   ¡¡ Muchas gracias de nuevo. Saludos cordiales !!
blackboxlogic (2021-12-05 16:33:20+00:00): Thank you for your edits. FYI referencing google as a source for editing OSM is taboo. Microsoft bing has a street-view which is allowed. Please ask if you have questions. -Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114499017
eggie (2021-12-03 06:43:53+00:00): Beste Kees  Dit is niet de juiste manier.
Nu is het oude adres van de kaart verdwenen en waarschijnlijk komt op de nieuwe locatie het adres 2x voor.
Dus alleen de info verwijderen en opnieuw toevoegen op de nieuwe locatie.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-03 06:46:36+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode.
MVG
eggie
MKnight (2021-12-03 08:31:19+00:00): Moin, Du hast die Hausnummer 1 vom Gebäude auf den Parkplatz verschoben, ich habe das rückgängig gemacht.