piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-09-28 07:30:50+00:00): Zie hier de huidige fietsroutering
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=50.7829%2C5.9660%3B50.7802%2C5.9572
Mochten er nog vragen zijn.. stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
mikafinja (2021-09-28 08:12:25+00:00): Your edit look good to me. Thanks for your efforts and keep on mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111799951
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
literan (2021-10-08 16:40:37+00:00): как правило, "Продукты", "Чулки-носки", "Пиво лучших производителей дешево" это не имя.

Не стоит заносить в это поле тексты с вывесок и рекламных объявлений
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
sebarnaud (2021-09-28 17:07:29+00:00): Même commentaire que https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111814780
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
sebarnaud (2021-09-28 17:06:02+00:00): Même commentaire que https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111814780
wielandb (2021-10-15 19:54:53+00:00): Hey :)
Wieso hast du den building-Tag entfernt?
Ich gehe mal davon aus, dass das ein Versehen war, und würde den building=hotel-Tag wiederherstellen(?)
Connecticut (2021-10-15 20:02:30+00:00): Ups. Da hab ich zuviel erwischt.
Hab den Tag wieder hinzugefügt ...
sebarnaud (2021-09-28 17:05:57+00:00): Même commentaire que https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111814780
sebarnaud (2021-09-28 17:05:53+00:00): Même commentaire que https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111814780
sebarnaud (2021-09-28 17:05:47+00:00): Même commentaire que https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111814780
sebarnaud (2021-09-28 17:05:36+00:00): Même commentaire que https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111814780
sebarnaud (2021-09-28 17:05:26+00:00): Même commentaire que https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111814780
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
mikafinja (2021-09-28 08:42:06+00:00): Your edit look good to me. Thanks for your efforts and keep on mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111801540
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-09-28 08:23:58+00:00): Hi reinhrdt..
Indeed .. no motor_vehicle here.. 
Now changed into a highway= pedestrian with bicycle=yes.
Tag  flood_prone=no  removed.
Greetz,
eggie
vulasala (2021-09-29 09:35:12+00:00): Hi peterkata,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 985543153 from service to residential, as the path giving access to multiple rooftops.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111801668
Eduard Popov (2021-09-28 07:33:06+00:00): :3
kuhni74 (2022-08-04 10:06:43+00:00): Der Königsschusssattel kommt mir mit 1854m wesentlich zu hoch vor - 1654m ließe ich mir einreden, bitte prüfen.
fkv (2022-08-05 12:29:10+00:00): Da muss ich mich verlesen haben, ist jetzt korrigiert.
kuhni74 (2022-08-05 16:54:11+00:00): merci
Sandal man (2021-10-27 19:05:18+00:00): Hola, gracias por tu contribución a OSM, pero ¿puedes echar un vistazo a tu cambio?
Una "road" es un nombre inapropiado y la carretera de conexión todavía tiene "acceso = no"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4545190#map=19/43.53989/-5.64718
ver también 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:highway
Saludos Juan
MoutmoutInSpace (2021-12-03 07:58:02+00:00): Hola, solo quería indicar que esta parte ya no está en construcción. No hay cambiado el tipo de la carretera.
Sandal man (2021-12-08 22:26:57+00:00): Pero, ¿qué tipo de camino es?
kartonage (2021-09-28 07:55:18+00:00): Hej, 

before you continue can you reply to the comments I made on your earlier changesets?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=13478049

Эй,

прежде чем продолжить, можете ли вы ответить на мои комментарии к вашим предыдущим изменениям?

https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=13478049
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Hadi Omid (2021-09-29 20:09:02+00:00): سلام
وقتتون بخیر،
جسارتا منبع ویرایش شما چی هستش؟
ممنون
opendcc (2021-09-28 09:34:36+00:00): Hallo,

typischerweise geht die Hausnummer auf das Wohnhaus. Postbote liefert die Post nicht in den Stall ...
MxxCon (2021-09-29 00:31:58+00:00): Hello.
Why did you remove part of a building in Manhattan, pointlessly moved a bunch of other nodes around the world?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111803949
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Lepuse (2021-10-03 13:30:48+00:00): 请不要将土地利用的节点粘合到道路上，这既不符合真实的土地利用情况（用地红线不允许超过道路红线），也给道路编辑带来不必要的麻烦。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Rainero (2023-05-02 19:04:06+00:00): Hallo el_tanno,
du hast hier die Adresse des Betreibers eingetragen; diese Adresse ist aber 10 km von hier entfernt. Das kann dazu führen, dass bei der Nutzung von OSM-Daten fälschlicherweise hierher geroutet wird. Daher entferne ich die addr-Attribute hier.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
KingKull2112 (2021-09-28 08:21:15+00:00): "Shape of swing set might not be accurate, please fix if you can." is what it cut off
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
murble (2023-09-16 16:06:53+00:00): corrected spelling of what?
Sandal man (2021-09-29 16:14:27+00:00): Please don't draw foot ways on top of other foot ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/987634283

Regards Jan
whb (2021-09-28 10:03:11+00:00): Guten Tag,

ist das ein öffentlicher Parkplatz?
Bitte ein passendes access-Tag hinzufügen. Danke!

Viele Grüße
whb
SebMarc1 (2021-09-28 14:00:06+00:00): Habs angepasst, danke für den Hinweis
martinst (2021-09-29 18:36:55+00:00): FYI: Für Bäche in denen nicht ständig Wasser fließt gibt es einen Tag, sie werden dann gestrichelt gerendert:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:intermittent
Gruß Martin
syncronic (2021-11-02 11:42:25+00:00): Hab ich doch gemacht (zB Kothgraben)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
bxl-forever (2021-09-28 19:13:37+00:00): Hello,
I get your point for this.

Just a question about this shape: this is not a school but it is still a building, right?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101966684/history
JuanjoMC (2021-09-28 19:24:04+00:00): Hi,

oups, yes indeed, in my mind I was deleting an amenity=school tag instead of building=school

Fixed, thank you for spotting it.
JuanjoMC (2021-09-28 19:29:08+00:00): BTW, do you know if there is an appropiate tag for this kind of "internat"?
I searched the wiki but did not find any
Frans S (2021-09-29 13:24:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Dob't combine (small) buildings. 
Follow traces of the roof more accurate,
In the open, look for a shadow which proves that the object is above groundlevel and probably a building. 
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111806613
ivanbranco (2021-09-28 15:37:05+00:00): Ciao Martino,

il changeset precedente era il mio. La modifica non era "a caso". Ho creato un'area che includesse tutti gli edifici che sapevo facessero parte dell'area ospedaliera, che conoscevo grazie a questo changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98122618
L'area dell'ex ospedale è quindi bene o male quella, sicuramente era da perfezionare, ma sarebbe bastato aggiungere un "fixme=Confine approssimato, correggere quando disponibili informazioni piu' dettagliate" o un note=* o una nota, o tutti e tre volendo.

Passando da nodo ad area secondo me si è andata a perdere informazione, perché non c'è più nulla che correla gli edifici all'area se non un nodo volante.

Se non hai nulla in contrario io procederei a ripristinare l'area, con l'aggiunta di un fixme o note.
ivanbranco (2021-09-28 16:23:30+00:00): refuso, ovviamente intendevo: "Passando da area a nodo secondo me ecc."
eggie (2021-09-28 11:15:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
trigpoint (2024-03-17 13:31:33+00:00): Hi
Just wondering why you removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6280854138/history ?

Cheers Phil
Sandal man (2021-09-30 09:25:05+00:00): Removed because no tags and no response. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/987644484
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Odin (2021-09-29 10:56:23+00:00): Where did you get the shift from?
flother (2021-09-29 11:32:49+00:00): GPS traces from Já 360 and locations of addresses in Staðfangaskrá (both available for use on OpenStreetMap).

The whole of Ísafjörður is slightly off actually, but that was too big of a job for me to take on.
Odin (2021-09-29 15:03:44+00:00): Well, if the _rest_ of the town is off, isn't it better to keep the relative distances approximately right? In particular, the gap between the church and house nr. 5 (which, now that I look closer, is incorrectly split in two) is decidedly larger than that.
Odin (2021-09-29 15:27:45+00:00): Incidentally, I can't seem to find the traces you mentioned publicly available anywhere. I presume that's from a differential/RTK receiver, as otherwise the shift made here is within the accuracy range of GPS...
flother (2021-09-29 17:53:52+00:00): From experience I would say it’s better to try and do things bit-by-bit, because otherwise tasks become too overwhelming. I’ll aim to find some time soon to realign more of Ísafjörður.

The GPS traces are visible on https://ja.is/kort/ (click the 360 button). I work for Já so I have direct access to the raw GPS coordinates. Staðfangaskrá is a public government dataset available from https://skra.is/gogn/grunngogn-til-nidurhals/stadfangaskra/. Those two datasets aren’t perfect but combined they can provide a high level of accuracy.
Odin (2021-09-29 18:44:13+00:00): Fair enough. I may end up doing the work for the row of houses north of the church, as I am looking to use the OSM data to generate the backdrop for a map to help visitors locate graves in the cemetery. Having the three metre gap between houses show up as less than one metre is ... less than ideal. :)
flother (2021-09-29 20:18:19+00:00): I improved the alignment of the buildings on Sólgata in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111885119. The gap between the church and the row of houses should be much better now, and you can use that alignment if you ever want to correct the alignment other buildings. Good luck with your map!
Odin (2021-09-29 23:05:13+00:00): Hmm. Thank you. I may set off with a tape measure and a time-of-flight laser sometime in the next few days. I'll need to get an RTK unit sometime. :)
Frans S (2021-09-29 13:27:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Do not include a yard into your mappings.
Follow the rooflines (buildings with extention) and map those not as a simple rectangular building.
A round building can be made good round with the O key when the object is still selected.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111807559
Dodko (2021-09-28 16:06:11+00:00): Do popisu zmien sa nepíše update ale niečo rozumné čo sa menilo/pridalo.

Na tom ihrisku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/987648284 je nadbytočný tag playground:theme=playground to sa používa pre detské ihriská.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:playground#Motivy
eggie (2024-01-23 18:44:47+00:00): Hoi Sven.... 
Even terinfo... 
De VR (Brandweer) is momenteel actief hier in het centrum met de boel openzetten voor hulodiensten. Dat ging (gaat)  niet helemaal goed. Wellicht in de gaten houden.
Ik heb motor_vehicle=designated allemaal omgezet naar emergency =yes in het voetgangersgebied.
Alle routerelaties heb ik ook weer hersteld hier. 
Met één VR mapper krijg ik geen contact.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146423744#map=17/51.82733/4.41164&layers=N

en 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Kevinneeleman/history#map=19/51.82674/4.41152&layers=N

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Gabriele Dri (2021-10-01 19:42:06+00:00): Ciao! Senza sapere eravamo entrambi nella stessa zona a fare sopralluoghi :-D Complimenti per aver trovato e mappato il sentiero dietro la Fiera. Ho appena controllato quando avevo percorso e mappato la prima parte 2 anni fa e mi ero bloccato al nodo 6694724058, quindi vuol dire che allora era impossibile proseguire oltre e in questo periodo hanno liberato. Oggi per cercare se esisteva ancora un sentiero presente nelle ortofoto del 1998 (se c'è è completamente ricoperto, sono riuscito a trovare solo i primi metri oggi; way 988720953) ho scoperto quello che avevi fatto tu 3 giorni fa. Quindi ho solo sistemato qualche nodo anche col mio gpx ed inserito il sentiero N-S "intermedio" presente. Grazie per il contributo!
borgofumo (2021-10-01 20:35:29+00:00): Ciao Gabriele, grazie a te che hai completato e aggiustato. In realtà sono passato di li per caso ed ho approfittato x mappare. Ci sono dei tratti che potrebbero essere considerati come track ma dubito che ci sara in futuro una manutenzione adeguata percui meglio lasciare path tanto si restringera'...
sbelemey (2021-09-28 09:42:15+00:00): #mbx_germany_roads
Ltrlg (2021-10-01 07:28:53+00:00): `addr:housenumber` n’est pas suffisant seul pour que l’adresse soit correcte : il faut soit ajouter `addr:street`, soit créer une relation `type=associatedStreet` (comme ceci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13279742).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111808949
Hungerburg (2021-09-28 21:38:16+00:00): Dear CreCrePL, please use an Editor, that does not damage relations.
Hungerburg (2021-09-28 22:14:41+00:00): After fixing the warnings that my edit inherited from yours (PSV routes), looks like the editor did not behave that bad after all.

Still I do not understand, why you split roads, with NO tag changes afterwards.

Because of a temporary "no right turn"? The split is not needed for the restriction, and the restriction is not going to last, when construction work is over. Will you be there again, to remove it?

In another place, you mapped a turning way, where there is no way; A turning circly would have been good. Now it is wrong.