piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
giro61 (2017-04-06 13:32:34+00:00): Questo è un errore grossolano perché mi si è bloccata la connessione internet. E' da cancellare
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:20:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Constable (2017-04-06 10:10:15+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai iniziato a mappare in zona. Vorrei darti due consigli prima che sia troppo tardi.
1) vedi che questo edificio risulta sovrapposto alla strada? succede perché le immagini di Bing che hai usato per mappare l'edificio, sono male allineate con il resto della mappa. Il problema sono le nuove immagini di Bing, non la mappa, quindi ricordati di NON spostare gli elementi che vedi già mappati. Le alternative sono due, usare JOSM come editor e non iD, in modo da poter utilizzare le immagini del geoportale nazionale, le quali sono ben allineate, seconda alternativa è usale le immagini più vecchie di Mapbox, le quali sono anch'esse ben allineate.
2) per favore quando salvi una modifica, inserisci un commento leggermente più preciso di "sto inserendo la mappa" e cose simili. Scrivi brevemente cosa hai modificato, in questo caso "aggiunto edificio" sarebbe stato perfetto.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Se hai dubbi chiedi pure, a me o segui la mailing list italiana https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
Grazie, ciao
eggie (2017-04-05 17:38:27+00:00): ahh .. Lekstraat..oke
eggie (2017-04-05 15:04:48+00:00): onderste footway losgemaakt van landuse forest en rechts vastgemaakt aan van heuven Goedhartlaan. Had geen verbinding.
Tip. pak een node en verschuif die... dan kan je zien wat er aan vastzit.
Zo gaat het toch al veel beter! Je moet er ook de lol van inzien. Wij zijn er niet op uit om iemand onderuit te halen. Goede mappers hebben we juist nodig.
eggie (2017-04-05 15:06:27+00:00): Liever dus niet met acces=no beginnen.
foot =yes hoeft dan niet op een voetpad. Het scheelt een hoopt tags. motor_vehicele mag automatisch niet, dus hoeft ook niet.
heathcliff (2017-04-05 15:20:07+00:00): als motorrijder wil ik dat betwisten.. Een auto niet want die past niet op het pad maar een motor mag wel want er staat geen bord dat dat verbied. er staat geen enkel bord bij de paden in dat stuk bos. :)
eggie (2017-04-05 15:29:06+00:00): motorvoertuigen routeren niet op wandelpaden. Dus die tag hoeft er niet bij. Bij doorsteekjes in de wijk (woonerf) met paaltjes kun je expleciet aangeven motorcar=no Dan routeert het wel voor motorfietsen. Zo min mogelijk tags is het beste.
eggie (2017-04-05 16:38:08+00:00): Zie hier hoe moeilijk doorgewinterde mapper het nog moeilijk hebben met onderscheid tussen footway en path
Toevallig net over motorcycle
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=640023#p640023
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
annorton (2017-04-05 12:43:58+00:00): Added building and side road
Владимир К (2017-04-06 06:58:44+00:00): Wrong way for naming ЗЯБ. Do not enter different names in one tag. name=ЗЯБ, full_name=Завод ячеистых бетонов.
Also English names are not always needed
agnostico (2017-04-05 12:45:51+00:00): Why "Statale" disappeared from the name?
Please give an answer to the question, not a "copy and paste".
This is a gentle warning: ignoring this kind of warnings could lead to a report  to DWG.
mxrev8 (2017-04-05 14:53:23+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
eggie (2017-04-05 17:39:59+00:00): In het begin volgen wij de verrichtingen van startende mappers.. ook om te helpen.  Succes.
Zijn er vragen ..bezoek dan ook het forum. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
trigpoint (2017-04-05 12:48:46+00:00): Hi, is this a real business that customers can visit?
I was about to ask, the website looks like it is contact by web or phone only so should not be in OSM.
Cheers Phil
andrewsh (2017-04-05 12:53:11+00:00): No idea, I just added the correct tag.
andrewsh (2017-04-05 12:53:50+00:00): Hmm, the website says they're in Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire:
4 – 12 Kempson Close
Gatehouse Way Industrial Estate
andrewsh (2017-04-05 12:54:56+00:00): I will probably remove them. Thanks for paying attention. It looked like a legitimate business to me… which it probably isn't. Well, not in Oxford, at least.
trigpoint (2017-04-05 12:59:01+00:00): Thank you.
It looked like spam, both the username and long description.
andrewsh (2017-04-05 13:00:46+00:00): Well, these two looked like spam, but the website looked okay-ish to me. I should have checked the address :)
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
pippinu (2017-04-10 15:44:42+00:00): Don't you think that amenity=shelter is more rich in information than building=roof?

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dpublic_transport
dgitto (2017-04-06 12:12:28+00:00): io chiederei sempre che vengano evitate le abbreviazioni, quando se ne conosce la soluzione. come sempre asserito nel wiki e altrove
dgitto (2017-04-06 12:14:52+00:00): anche perché poi ci si fiondano i matti come api sul miele, e gli dobbiamo pure dare ragione, dio ci scansi :))
francoLI (2017-04-06 20:25:43+00:00): purtroppo questa area, come quella del canalone del tripodo, risponde ad altre esigenze più che ad esigenze di protezione ambientale. Chiamarla senza la sigla non da l'idea di cosa si sta indicando, perchè sono due località completamente differenti, ne l'area è una riserva.
rimane che chiamarla per quel che  è una creazione burocratica
dgitto (2017-04-06 21:39:39+00:00): Io parlavo delle abbreviazioni.
M., C.da
 Cav di gr croc. Daniele
francoLI (2017-04-07 04:27:20+00:00): ah,era solo  grafica, potrebbe venire una dizione enorme.
cmq
dgitto (2017-04-07 05:11:45+00:00): Monte e contrada? Ci sono gigabyte a disposizione. Grafica di che? Parli della mappa su openstreetmap.com?
Non mappare per i rendering e non usare abbreviazioni sono due concetti facili e ripetuti ovunque nel wiki. Impossibile non imbattercisi.
mavl (2017-04-15 08:18:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:14:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:19:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:15:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2017-04-15 08:16:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
Sanniu (2017-06-08 08:20:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/86430987 - is it really a roundabout? It has very strange geometry for this...
user_3216889 (2017-04-05 15:38:23+00:00): Welkom op OSM

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
user_3216889 (2017-04-05 16:01:39+00:00): Een grasveldje is geen park.
ObliviousCT (2017-04-06 16:43:10+00:00): Ach er spelen kinderen en je kunt er ontspannen. Ik zou het een parkje of trapveldje noemen. Why so serious ;)..
user_3216889 (2017-04-06 18:38:17+00:00): Omdat de laatste maanden diverse personen overal ineens parkjes hadden toegevoegd, omdat ze het idee hadden dat e.e.a. gunstig was in het spelletje Pokemon Go.
ObliviousCT (2017-04-06 20:24:39+00:00): Juist. Dus omdat een stel Pokémonjagers willekeurig 'parkjes' uit de grond stampt, moet ik het parkje achter mijn huis als grasveldje bestempelen... Makes sense ;)
user_3216889 (2017-04-06 20:39:47+00:00): Een park is een uitgestrekt terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het een naam.
Een enkel grasveldje maakt nog geen geen park.
ObliviousCT (2017-04-09 10:54:09+00:00): Het is duidelijk dat je openstreetmaps erg serieus neemt. Ik begrijp je uitleg, als je strikt de definitie zou volgen is het inderdaad geen park. Ik heb het enkel zo genoemd omdat het in de volksmond zo wordt genoemd. Ik wilde het stuk onder Kerk & Zanen ook aanpassen en als park markeren (schuin onder Wielerpark WV Avanti langs de N11). Dit is heeft alle kenmerken die jij zojuist noemde, behalve een naam... Is het dan wel of geen park? Ik zou zeggen van wel, jij zou zeggen van niet denk ik...
user_3216889 (2017-04-09 11:53:59+00:00): Dat laatste lijkt er meer op, geen probleem.
ObliviousCT (2017-04-09 16:55:06+00:00): Ok ik heb zojuist een begin gemaakt met dat park. Het gaat aan de rechterkant nog verder, maar daar ben ik eigenlijk nooit geweest...
eggie (2017-04-09 19:45:24+00:00): Oblivious... Je bent van harte welkom op het forum van OSM. Dan wordt ook veel duidelijk hoe de community in de praktijk werkt en dat het zeker een serieuze zaak is. Je kunt je evt. voorstellen onder het draadje Welkom. Hier kun je ook om advies vragen. OSM is een samenwerkingsproject. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Polarbear (2017-07-10 15:38:42+00:00): Lieber dkwmz, du hast in diesem Changeset ein Stück A13 gelöscht und ein anderes eingefügt, dabei sind etliche Eigenschaften verloren gegangen, und routen- und Fernbusrelationen gingen kaputt. 
Ich habe es repariert. 
Leider ist weder aus deinem Kommentar "neu", noch aus den Änderungen ersichtlich, was die eigentliche Absicht dabei war. 
Bitte sei künftig vorsichtiger, und kommentiere deine Änderungen besser, damit man entsprechend helfen kann.
Polarbear (2017-07-11 22:18:23+00:00): OK, danke für deine persönliche Nachricht.
Polarbear (2017-07-11 22:14:04+00:00): Changeset has been reverted: unintentional deletion of a from-node in an enforcement relation
dgitto (2017-04-05 14:31:30+00:00): Elisuperficie is not the name.
dgitto (2017-04-05 14:34:05+00:00): Do you change EVERY train station in the world now, calling them "stazione ferroviaria". Because you are doing this
dgitto (2017-04-05 14:35:13+00:00): What about airports. Vandalize there
dgitto (2017-04-05 14:38:00+00:00): Can some mappers help us to decide please. We can accept voting. The user mxrev8 don't partecipate in mailing list so the comments arethe only place
sbiribizio (2017-04-05 19:39:16+00:00): Hi.
Elisuperficie is the italian name for Helipad.
The name 'Elisuperficie ospedale Papardo' is more useful because gives more information.
It's like calling a generic airport in New York simply 'Airport'  instead of 'JFK Airport','Newark' and so on.

I don't think you're are italian, so please think before touch others work (especially local mappers work) ignoring friendly comments.
Regards
pippinu (2017-04-10 15:26:05+00:00): Santa Maria Alemanna is NOT a place of worship. It is an ancient church, no longer consecrate, which is now used as a place for conferences. That's why it wasn't marked as place_of_worship.

The comment you used for the changeset is generic, does not describe at all what is being done into the changeset, and makes it hard for other users to check your work. You should find the time to write a meaningful comment when you change data written by others with whom you are not in contact.
user_3216889 (2017-04-05 15:47:52+00:00): Welkom op OSM

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
user_3216889 (2017-04-05 15:49:13+00:00): Park gecorrigeerd naar gras. Een park is een groter geheel (met meestal een naam), waarbinnen zich gebieden bevinden met gras, bomen, vijvers, paden etc.
dgitto (2017-04-05 14:24:58+00:00): Stop changing the schools. They are 2. You mapped 3
dgitto (2017-04-05 14:26:11+00:00): Fontanella as a name was never accepted by the community. You don't care
agnostico (2017-04-05 19:22:27+00:00): The node 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2387512078
has an incorrect tagging.
addr:housenumber ="Caserma Nicola Calipari" is wrong. The name must be "Caserma Nicola Calipari" with operator="Polizia di Stato".
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-07-20 01:59:27+00:00): Hi Oreg, please have a look at this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/484948532. Maybe you have some updated classification base on newer imagery ?? cause this road has a good surface (highly possible asphalt) and connecting several settlements area. Thank you...
Mike Baggaley (2017-04-06 10:06:43+00:00): Hi, is foot allowed as well? Perhaps access=no could be removed?

Cheers, Mike
trigpoint (2017-04-06 16:53:56+00:00): As it is designated as a public_bridleway foot is very defiintely allowed, as are horses and bikes. The bicycle=yes tag is therefore pointless and adds tag clutter.
jogger333 (2017-05-03 10:13:56+00:00): Dear Mike, Looking at the wiki, one should indeed make the usage clear with appropriate access tagging:

"Also taginfo shows a significant number of uses of:
designation=permissive_footpath
designation=permissive_bridleway
These tags should be used in combination with an appropriate highway=* tag, and appropriate access=* tags."
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation

I think that bettyA did it correctly. What do you think?
Mike Baggaley (2017-05-03 10:45:54+00:00): Hi Jogger333 , No I think the tagging was was incorrect (the original done by Russ McD). The update by bttyA was what brought it to light. The designation=public_bridleway would set the default access of foot, bicycle and horse=yes, however, access=no would override this and set them all to no. This combination allows a public bridleway to be closed (e.g. for a landslip) without losing its status.To explicitly set the accesses using access=, it would need access=designated, or could be left unset. 

At least that is my understanding.

NB in the absence of a reply from bttyA, I removed access=no and bicycle=yes a couple of days ago.

Regards,
Mike
jogger333 (2017-05-03 11:13:59+00:00): Hey mike, thanks for the explanation! I was looking for a reference of your statement "The designation=public_bridleway would set the default access of foot, bicycle and horse=yes" but I couldn't find it in the wiki, I really would like to implement it correctly in our routing, Can you give me a reference? Thanks in advance!
Mike Baggaley (2017-05-03 19:05:47+00:00): Unfortunately, I can't find a reference any more - the pages on access and UK mapping guidelines appear to have been changed towards the end of last year with the meaning of designated being changed. Bizarrely, the access=designated page now says the value is deprecated without saying what replaces it, while the main access=* page includes =designated as a standard value. The Proposed features/Designation page says designation tag was rejected, but various other pages include it. You may find the UK tagging Guidelines page at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines helpful - this is what used to contain the details of how designation=* and [access]=designated worked in combination, but this page is by no means complete in that it does not give a full explanation of how to interpret a value with highway, designation, access and individual accesses. Also, designation=permissive_footpath and permissive_bridleway seem to have been included just because there are ways with these values in the database. Bit of a minefield!
jogger333 (2017-05-04 07:42:55+00:00): Oh yes, the information is really vague. This will make it a bit difficult to conclude routing rules from it that are correct worldwide, not only in UK.
Let's see if that is possible and if there are any conflicts popping up.
Thanks for your summary, this helped me a lot to understand the issue here! Best, Jan
mavl (2017-04-15 08:17:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 47806843 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1301].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:45:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-04-05 17:43:29+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-05 17:45:08+00:00): Het is niet de bedoeling om de gegevens van de adresnode over te zetten naar het gebouw. Dit geeft verwarring. wat is je motief? Graag reactie.
jaapl (2017-04-05 18:16:46+00:00): Dank je wel voor de info. Ik begin net en had me eerst wat beter moeten inlezen.
eggie (2017-04-05 18:35:10+00:00): Denk dat het wel goed komt. Je past het zelf aan?
jaapl (2017-04-05 18:36:16+00:00): Ja, ik zag dat HenkL al 1 van de fouten had gecorrigieerd. De andere twee heb ik net aangepast.
eggie (2017-04-05 18:36:17+00:00): Kijk en doe ook mee op ons forum. Je kunt je voorstellen onder het draadje welkom. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
eggie (2017-04-05 18:37:50+00:00): Ja... dat heet teamwork :)
jaapl (2017-04-05 18:51:44+00:00): Ik heb me net even voorgesteld op het forum, hopen dat dat door de moderatie heen komt ;-)
eggie (2017-04-05 18:54:57+00:00): Dat is Martin.. en die is niet zo moeilijk.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
SomeoneElse (2017-04-05 14:42:11+00:00): Hello,
"minor edits / repetition / redundancy / abreviation / duplication / contraction / shortening / cleaning up overbloating / " isn't really much more informative than "minor edits".
I really don't understand why you have made https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45547650/history triangular.
Best Regards,
Andy
mavl (2018-12-25 19:56:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:30:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_3216889 (2017-04-05 15:50:05+00:00): Welkom op OSM

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
user_3216889 (2017-04-05 15:54:02+00:00): Huisnummers stonden al op huisnummerpunten aangegeven, hoort niet op gebouw.
Kantoren samengevoegd met bijbehorende adrespunten.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:42:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:29:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:40:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-04-05 17:46:43+00:00): idem .. niet duplicate op het gebouw taggen
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:31:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Ars-UA (2017-04-05 14:49:44+00:00): Не надо. Откатил.
Ars-UA (2017-04-05 14:52:19+00:00): Навесы оставил.