piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
LockOnGuy (2022-09-14 09:21:01+00:00): >You are watering down the number of Kurds in Kirkuk.                
And how's this related to your edit here? Here we are talking about a town in another state.                 
                
> I didnt cuss you .        
go read your previous messages and see what you said at the end of each one of them.                      
                     
> the dwellers of Ankawa do not understand that alphabet.                    
also wrong, this alphabet and language. is used by the locals of this town as the only spoken language and it is mandatory to teach how to write and read in Schools.                  
                
> Most of them are Pure Arabs.              
No, they are Assyrians who speak Syriac, most of them barely speak Kurdish and use the Arabic language with the Kurds since it's a language both parties understand.                 
             
> their mother tongue is chaldean and Arabic               
Chaldean is an accent of the Syriac language, and Arabic is not their mother language.                         
                          
Please read here and try understand more about Ankawa town:                     
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankawa
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 10:04:33+00:00): It is not in another state. It is inside Iraq. same state same constitution.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-14 10:43:18+00:00): And the constitution said it is an official language. Here in OSM we use local language as the language of 'name' this town 'name' should be in bilingual in local Syriac and Kurdish for the nearby residents.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 11:46:21+00:00): And in Kirkuk, when a neighborhood is purely 100 % Kurdish,  the name should be 100 % only in Arabic ??????????????????????????
LockOnGuy (2022-09-14 11:56:30+00:00): Here we are discussing this matter, the matter of this node.           
Your comparison here is not apple to apple, here is different alphabet too.       
And there is no 100% Kurdish neighborhood in Kirkuk, not even the most populated Kurdish areas inside the Kurdish region.              
Here, this town of Ankawa should be in bilingual language, the language of the locals and the language that's spoken by nearby locals.    Please don't argue and try to understand.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 12:32:36+00:00): Yes there is 100 % Kurdish in Kirkuk
dont bring information from your bible and tell me that it is from the government
Understood ?
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 12:33:36+00:00): This town of Kirkuk should be in bilingual language, the language of the locals and the language that's spoken by nearby locals.
You understand or no ?
LockOnGuy (2022-09-14 12:40:11+00:00): Again, here we are talking about Ankawa town in Erbil, not a neighborhood in another state.       
Also, please use respectful words.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 12:46:28+00:00): In Erbil, it is Halal and in Kirkuk, it is Haram and Tabooooooo ?
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 12:47:27+00:00): I will tell the Data Group Team about the your personal racist rules that you want to impose on the map.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-14 12:53:29+00:00): Again, you're not comparing apple to apple, read my comments again and read my messages, I've already answered this many time and even gave you examples of how it's mapped around the world. Please read carefully. Take a break and read it after your break.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 13:44:30+00:00): Yes dear
when the people are Christians 
the name should be in two languages
when they are kurds, Only arabic is halal.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-14 13:45:35+00:00): I am very clear
you are playing around from the USA.
The tag NAME must contain both 
Kurdish & Arabic script together.
Dont play around .
LockOnGuy (2022-09-14 13:57:23+00:00): Again we here are talking about edits in this changeset. if you keep being an ignorant then I'm not going to repeat myself over and over while you do not understand nor cooperate. I was being very patient with you, don't take advantage of this.            
You are being a hypocrite here when you say a neighborhood in another area should be bilingual while you delete the bilingual from a town here.
Bravo Mapper (2022-09-15 14:16:36+00:00): Dear. You have 6 violations :
1. You keep claiming that Arabs are majority in Kirkuk without providing any document or governmental link.
2. For two months, you have been removing the Kurdish parts from the NAME tag, that made me create duplicate points next two each other, one in Arabic one in Kurdish.
3.  You keep claiming that duplicate points are against OSM and left no any option for the kurdish text to appear. completely racist.
4.  You are in the USA and want to do demographic changes in Kirkuk and claim that you have been on the spot when renaming POI's. I have called you hundred times to meet face to face but you keep evading because you re in the USA.
5. You claim that it is taboo to find a neighbourhood in Kirkuk that all the dwellers speak entirely Kurdish as if you have visited every single house in Kirkuk which are estimated 670000 houses.
6.  In the NAME tag for a town in Erbil, you had put an alien alphabet that is not decryptable by any one for only one reason, because the dwellers are from your race but you dont accept the Kurdish to appear.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-15 14:28:16+00:00): @Bravo Mapper You have deleted all of the language names for https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/2479376280 here.  This is not OK and I will revert it.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-15 14:32:27+00:00): @Bravo Mapper   This will be my last comment for you since you're being in ignorant here. I told you we are talking about this edit of yours here, but I'm just gonna answer you one more time about these points of yours.           
              
1. The last census done by the Iraqi government stated the Arabs are %72 and the Kurds are %21                       
2. Because 'name' should be in the local language only.                       
3. Duplicate points are consider spam.                      
4. No, I'm local Iraqi and I'm from this City unlike you who maybe from Sulaymaniyah. You never asked me out to met face to face, that was Renas Azad account which this proves that Renas Azad account is yours and you have been Kurdification the nearby areas around the Kurdistan region. And you probably paid by the KRG to rename such areas to Kurdish only.                  The ones I changed are only the ones who was added in Arab areas with Arab names and the Kurds changed them to only Kurdish like the user Renas (you) and many other users.                    
5. Wrong, there is no neighborhood that are only kurds, the most one that have kurds are like only 50%. this is absolute not true.                       
6. You mean Ankawa, not Erbil, and the name I put is the only name in the only language the local use for the town of Ankawa, I added it in bilingual with Kurdish because the face that it's a town that are neighbored by Kurdish. You called this Syriac alphabet "alien" while it's the historic alphabet used by the same Assyrians locals in this town from thousands of years even before the existing of the Kurds and Arabs in Iraq.                
      
Lastly, Stop kurdification of the nearby areas of the Kurdish region.
Ghybu (2022-09-15 16:33:41+00:00): Hi,
Can someone show me (a photo for example) how the name of this city is displayed on street signs in the city? Double or single signaling and in which language?
LockOnGuy (2022-09-15 16:54:52+00:00): @Ghybu The law number 6 was issued by the Kurdistan regional government parliament in 2014 in their 9th sitting on October 29, 2014.         
The law is clear and stated that all signs in Ankawa should be in the local Syriac language. and This law was published in the official newspaper and sent to all governmental offices around the region. This law forces all shop owners, hotels, etc to have Syriac in their banner. also forces the municipal department to put road signs in Syriac.            
You can read and see the official governmental papers here: https://ankawa.com/forum/index.php?topic=784369
Ghybu (2022-09-15 17:35:26+00:00): OK! The name in Syriac is justified here (this is a decision taken by Iraqi Kurdistan).

But you also added names in Syriac in areas outside of Iraqi Kurdistan. Do they also allow Syriac names in the city (eg see Bartella https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/36.3535/43.3843)?
LockOnGuy (2022-09-15 18:04:11+00:00): @Ghybu I'm not the one who added that but it is correct.         
          
Iraq’s constitution, Article 4/Fourth stated that the Syriac language is the official language in the administrative units in which they constitute the density of the population.                
English: https://investpromo.gov.iq/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/iraqi-constitution-En.pdf          
Arabic: https://investpromo.gov.iq/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Iraqi-constitution-Ar.pdf                       
                           
If you're too busy to read it, here is a quick and short text from Wikipedia that explains it:               
The constitution of Iraq stipulates that the Syriac language is considered an official language in areas where the speakers constitute a population density. This is applied in the Nineveh Governorate, which is the main center of gravity for the Syriac language. It is considered an official language in the districts of Hamdaniya, Bakhdida, Bartella, Karamles, Tel Kaif, and Al-Shekhan, in addition to the Sumail district in Dohuk governorate and Shaqlawa district in Erbil governorate. 
read here: https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D8%BA%D8%A9_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%D8%B1%D9%8A%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%8A%D8%A9#cite_note-81:~:text=%D9%8A%D9%86%D8%B5%20%D8%AF%D8%B3%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%B1%20%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%82,%D9%81%D9%8A%20%D9%85%D8%AD%D8%A7%D9%81%D8%B8%D8%A9%20%D8%A3%D8%B1%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%84           
             
So I guess we should add the Syriac name to the other places too so it can be according to the OSM name rules that state the name should be in the local language of those areas, and the Iraqi constitution and the Kurdish regional government law.
Sanniu (2022-09-14 09:07:19+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please use meaningful changeset message that other people can understand what you change about.
Please connect newly added ways to existing network to allow automatic routing. Please ensure that all ways crossings have common point for sake of automatic routing.
Brayat Mentaok (2022-09-13 10:47:04+00:00): Ada salah tulis.
Maksudnya ialah penambahan lampu APILL di Simpang 4 Jetis, Bantul.
eggie (2024-12-02 14:07:49+00:00): Dag Martin,

Op de Hoeksedijk in Maasdam heb ik bicycle=use_sidepath weer verwijderd.
Je mag daar gewoon fietsen. 
Er loopt zelfs een fietsroute.
Het kruispunt met de Dorpsstraat heb ik opnieuw gereconstrueerd en de routerelaties verlegd. 

MVG
eggie
emvee (2024-12-02 14:59:56+00:00): Hoi,

Bedankt voor de melding, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319382691

Volgens mij was bicycle:backward=use_sidepath daar gewoon goed, de fietsroute gaat er "forward" overheen dus dat is geen probleem en noordelijk staat er een G11 bord dus fietsers "backward" worden geacht van het eenrichtingsfietspad gebruikt te maken.

De fietsroute over dit stuk weg is niet de laatste vijf jaar gewijzigd, https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/analysis/route/2060420/changes?pageSize=25&pageIndex=0&impact=true

Groeten!

Martin.
eggie (2024-12-02 15:10:55+00:00): Hoi Martin Je hebt gelijk...  Ik heb het teruggezet.
Ik was daar zo aan het hannesen om het allemaal goed te krijgen met al die routerelaties dus heb ik daar overheen gekeken.
Het is weer correct nu.
Groet,
eggie
emvee (2024-12-02 15:55:39+00:00): Fijn.

Al met al toch een positieve impact: https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/analysis/changeset/159842205/6372489
RaphaelPasloin (2022-09-13 10:55:49+00:00): rue du Bourget 1, B-1049  not 1149
literan (2022-09-14 19:23:31+00:00): корректный тег для совмещенных вело/пеше дорог это

highway	path	
bicycle	designated
foot	designated

верну назад корректный тег
canfe (2022-09-16 08:19:39+00:00): Non penso che la rotatoria abbia quel nome
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126127343
canfe (2022-09-16 08:20:13+00:00): La rotatoria non penso abbia nome
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126127343
canfe (2022-09-16 08:21:28+00:00): La rotatoria non penso abbia nome
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126127343
canfe (2022-12-18 12:20:33+00:00): Passati tre mesi senza risposta provvedo ad eliminare
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126127343
Richard (2022-09-19 18:19:23+00:00): Hello Sam,

highway=tertiary isn't really appropriate for a single-track winding rural road. I have changed this back to highway=unclassified.

Richard
Sakari_N (2023-03-16 18:28:13+00:00): Hi, I see you added a guest house in the middle of a forest, with no building. What is this edit based on? I can't see any evidence of this guest house being here.
vojtechzaboril (2022-09-20 17:54:06+00:00): Neměla by být označena jako construction? Již se staví a v řece jsou základy pilířů. Díky za odpověď
Piskvor (2022-09-29 09:35:48+00:00): TL;DR: neměla.

Pilíře jsou tu už zmapovány jako existující (protože už jsou reálně postavené). Jinak je to podobný stav jako u Dvoreckého mostu: bridge=* je mostní konstrukce, highway=* je cesta, která po dané konstrukci vede. Přes řeku může být most bez cesty, ale ne naopak: 
nelze stavět cestu po neexistujícím mostním tělese, nejprve je třeba postavit ten most, než lze dělat svrchní stavby. Náhodou jsem to dnes viděl v terénu: ve vzduchu nad Vltavou žádná cesta ve výstavbě není, dosud je jen v plánech ;)

Z hlediska renderů je to asi akademické, ale pro konzumenty dat to rozlišení mezi construction:* a proposed:* dává smysl. Přetahovat se o ten stav sem a tam nebudu, vzhledem k tomu, že by realita do pár měsíců měla mapu dohnat :)
Piskvor (2022-09-29 09:55:01+00:00): Příklad mostu bez cesty je třeba tenhle viadukt k bývalému NNŽ: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26249738 
koleje jsou sneseny, pěšina zarostla, ale most stojí. Zanedlouho bude dokončena i ta kratší část mostu tady, z Karlína na Štvanici - pořád po něm nic nepovede, ale až tehdy reálně na něm bude odpovídat stav highway=construction.
GladGrip (2025-08-29 09:30:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094115081#map=19/28.032762/-82.435015&layers=N

highway=services? Probably highway=service
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2025-08-29 11:34:42+00:00): Hi GladGrip!

My name is Yuliya, and I'm the Quality Control Lead on the OSM team at Lyft. 
I have reverted this change because the service roads here have already been mapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171178124#map=15/28.04327/-82.43362&layers=VN. This was a clear oversight. Thank you very much for bringing it to our attention. We apologize for the error.

Best regards,
Yuliya
gscholz (2022-09-17 05:56:52+00:00): Hi Rymno,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=2.38047&lat=6.39101&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

As it has connected ways in a strange way:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126130071

I have reverted it to fix those issues. I am wondering about how this could happen as you are using JOSM. May be you like to educate yourself about its internal validator:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator
Kind regards
Guido
Lejun (2022-09-13 13:46:08+00:00): Salut les jeunes, ou les profs après tout… Un grand merci pour cette 3e contribution à OpenStreetMap qui comporte malheureusement deux légers soucis :

– Les horaires indiqués du Sabay Thaï ne sont pas au format demandé[1] et rendent impossible la compréhension par un logiciel. La valeur attendue serait « We,Fr,Sa 12:00-14:30,19:00-23:00; Su 12:00-15:00 » ;
– Le fleuriste Vegetal Kaz a été placé au milieu de la route. Il faudrait le déplacer vers le bâtiment adéquat.

Je vous laisse faire les modifications nécessaires et reste à votre disposition si vous avez des questions ou autre.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening%20hours
Lejun (2022-09-24 05:20:34+00:00): Faute de réponse, je suis intervenu et ai modifié la valeur de opening_hours et déplacé le nœud du fleuriste. Strike 1.
user_18108372 (2022-12-31 00:39:44+00:00): from satellite imagery there seems to be nothing here. Are you sure the school is in the correct location?
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-09-13 19:20:09+00:00): Hi, please don't overcomplicate junctions. As far as I can see, nothing was missing here. Separate lanes should not be mapped as separate ways.
Heldis (2022-09-14 14:25:46+00:00): Hi, there was missing left turn and route was guided from right trough sharp corner!
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-09-14 14:43:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/629198769/history#map=19/59.47383/24.89777

It looks like it was fixed only 8 days ago. Maybe your routing software had an outdated version of the map.

Thx for reverting to a more simple variant!
Frans S (2022-09-13 14:06:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
Don't let ways of residential areas cross buildings.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126131016
SHARCRASH (2022-09-14 10:26:11+00:00): Testing the comments formatting: [this track was misplaced](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/845832995)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-26 05:18:20+00:00): name=الاسدي لبيع مواد التنضيف
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10020770400

shop=الاسدي_لبيع_مواد_التنضيف ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Tag_descriptions_for_key_%22shop%22 fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-09-13 12:47:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126132810 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-09-13 12:47:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126132810 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-09-13 12:47:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126132810 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
pitfire (2022-09-14 05:56:00+00:00): Hallo Matyjace,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
Please the number should be in international format (ITU-T E.164).
Tilia_J (2022-09-18 12:43:15+00:00): Als het geen buurt of wijk is wat is het dan wel? Zomaar de verkeerde tags weghalen zonder de juiste toe te voegen is "not done".

Zou je dit willen corrigeren?
Rubenke (2022-09-18 14:33:46+00:00): Het is onderdeel van een andere buurt en wijk, had het kunnen verplaatsten i.p.v. een nieuwe aanmaken op een andere plek. Maar dat heb ik niet gedaan.
Dus een correctie lijkt mij overbodig, dan klopt er niks meer van.
Tilia_J (2022-09-18 15:13:28+00:00): Je kunt place=plot gebruiken of anders de tags naar de landuse=commercial verplaatsen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aplace%3Dplot
user_5359 (2022-09-13 15:58:33+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Du übermalst ein Gebäude (auf Grund des Luftbildes (wo man "nur" die Dachfläche aber nicht die Wände sieht, die normalerweise eingetragen werden.)  Jetzt kann man sicherlich diskutieren, ob das richtig oder falsch ist. Aus meiner Sicht sollte man die deutliche getrennte Garage auf jeden Fall erfassen.

Was mit Sicherheit aber bei Deinem Vorgehen falsch ist, dass Du beide Varianten stehen läßt, statt die unkorrekte Variante zu löschen. An einem Platz kann nur ein Gebäude stehen. Bitte entscheide Dich für eine Variante und lösche die andere Variante.
user_5359 (2022-09-13 15:51:50+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Das Baujahr wird im Schlüssel start_date erfasst und nicht im Namen. Wenn der Name "Haus am Walde" nicht groß an der Hauswand steht, wäre dies auch eher eine Beschreibung als der Name des Hauses.
map per (2023-11-04 16:36:16+00:00): Hallo loocee,

ist hier wirklich ein öffentliches Kunstwerk oder ist das das Privathaus oder das Studio von W.L.?

Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139040716.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
eggie (2022-09-13 14:52:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


Tip Een woning van vorm veranderen heeft vaak geen zin, want bij een update komt de oude vorm weer terug. Het is BAG import. Het beste kun je een terugmelding doen richting Kadaster.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=westfalen%2030&resultOffset=0&objectId=0344200000040355&geometry.x=138008.961&geometry.y=452402.76300042&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0344010000030371

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
yasslay (2022-09-13 12:38:43+00:00): Apologies for the vague changeset comment, I definitely did not remove any roads or ways in this changeset, I removed the word 'road' from the roundabout and junction exit naming, e.g. Grovehurst Road Junction becomes Grovehurst Junction.
marczoutendijk (2022-09-13 13:01:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126133442 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
osmLover (2022-09-13 17:12:18+00:00): Anstatt sie zu löschen, hätte sich auch eine elegantere Lösung angeboten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Damit wäre sie zumindest vermerkt und mit der übergeordneten Relation verknüpft; dann wundert man sich nicht, warum sie fehlt (so wie ich)...
monotar (2022-09-13 18:20:35+00:00): Es gab die Route nie. Ein einziges Planungsdokument von vor 4 Jahren reicht für OSM nicht. Um eine geplante Fahrradroute einzuzeichnen soll in OSM mindestens eine Absichtserklärung zur Einrichtung vorliegen (z.B. Zeitungsberichte oder Einzeichnungen in Geoportale).

Klar kann das nicht jeder wissen, aber bevor man großflächige Edits macht muss man sich damit beschäftigen.
marczoutendijk (2022-09-13 13:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126133442 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk (2022-09-13 13:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126133442 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
trigpoint (2022-09-15 14:03:43+00:00): Hi Sam
I tried to contact you over a week ago asking what your motivation is for changing a large number of unclassified roads to tertiary but you have not responded and have continued making these damaging edits. As a mapper I consider this very disrespectful.

This road over the Beacons has been mapped as unclassified for over 10 years, why do you consider that to be wrong? It certainly does not meet my expectations of a tertiary and your edits could result in some very poor routing decisions.

Also please use meaningful changeset comments that inform your fellow mappers of your intentions, line correction is just meaningless gobbledeegook.

Your edits are over a wide area, have you surveyed them? I believe they should be reverted asap.

Cheers Phil