piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tyr_asd (2016-10-29 08:48:58+00:00): Hallo. Diese Änderungen verstehe ich nicht ganz. Wieso hast du hier ein neues Polygon für die Alm angelegt, wenn es schon http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3205367 gibt? Auch fehlten dem Polygon weitere Tags, zusätzlich zum "name". (Und die Schreibweise "Saiser" mit ai ist wahrscheinlich nur ein Tippfehler, oder?)

PS: Wofür war denn die andere Linie, die du in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41460790 hinzugefügt und hier gelöscht hast ursprünglich gedacht?
tyr_asd (2016-12-21 08:58:44+00:00): Schade, dass du auf meine Frage nicht geantwortet hast. :(

Ich habe das Polygon jetzt aufgrund der oben genannten Mängel gelöscht.
mavl (2019-01-13 16:58:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 16:58:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Rustamok (2023-04-05 15:45:06+00:00): данное здание указано не под этим номером
Владимир К (2016-08-15 12:47:48+00:00): вы бы домики что ли выровняли - сделали из квадратными, а то жуть же :)
Tomas Straupis (2016-08-15 08:45:10+00:00): Mikrosofto (Bingo) ortofoto labai netikslus. Atstačiau kai kuriuos objektus į teisingas pozicijas pagal ORT10LT.
acsd (2016-08-18 18:17:41+00:00): Правильный тег для бани leisure=sauna
Carnildo (2016-08-16 03:39:48+00:00): I'm not comfortable with armchair-mapping the trails in Mount Spokane State Park.

1) There's been some re-alignment and closure of trails in the park in the past decade.  Some Strava tracks correspond to routes that are now closed.

2) Some of the trails in the park are former logging roads that are maintained for vehicle access in the event of a forest fire, and are better mapped as "highway=track" rather than "highway=footway".  This isn't always obvious from the air.

3) *Nobody* has a good map of the park trails.  Every map I've looked at has major errors, ranging from showing trails that don't exist and omitting ones that do, to routes that are actually a mile or two longer than shown, to trails that haven't had the brush cleared from them in a decade or more.

In this edit, one of the two trails you've added has been closed for revegetation for a few years, while the other looked like an informal trail when I mapped its junction with Trail 160, and it may no longer be passible after last fall's windstorm.
Supaplex (2016-08-15 15:51:21+00:00): 您好：

恭喜你完成第一筆編輯，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

一般來說不建議初次編輯的人使用較強大但也容易不小心出問題JOSM來編輯，請使用網頁版的編輯器iD，裡頭也有教學模式教基本的概念。一定需要使用JOSM時請對照OSM Wiki的文件，查詢能夠使用的標籤

剛剛瀏覽你的編輯，發現以下問題：
1. building=yes拚成buildings=YES，前者才正確
2. 有中文標籤，但是寫中文程式認不得，需要協議用訂英文的標示方法
3. amenity=school是用來標示學校範圍，裡面可能有好幾棟教學樓，或是操場、球場，不應該用building標籤

如果有什麼進階的資料想要放到OpenStreetMap上，請洽詢下面列出的溝通管道，與社群講你想做什麼。先前也有討論防災相關的標籤標準：
https://osmtw.hackpad.com/OSM-lis34MoHRDu

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群 Facebook 社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
敬祝畫圖愉快！
mueschel (2016-08-17 11:04:13+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du den Way hier mal anschauen? Da stimmt was mit dem Tagging nicht:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328415896
Gruß, Jan
gerhard81 (2016-08-17 11:50:39+00:00): Hallo Jan!
Danke für den Hinweis - ich hab's bereits korrigiert.
Grüße Gerhard
EdLoach (2018-03-26 16:17:37+00:00): The traffic lights on the underpass seem to have been a little premature - this newspaper article describes them as long awaited (but still not there) http://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/16110107.New_underpass_is_long_term_plan_for_traffic_gridlock/ so I'll remove them.
ecatmur (2018-03-26 16:36:32+00:00): Yes, please do - don't know how I got the idea that they had put traffic lights in.
fkv (2017-09-10 22:08:13+00:00): Du hast am Prochenberg Wege gemappt, die dann von User martin0203 vereinfacht(?) wurden (u.a. in Changeset 48600801). Kannst du dir das anschauen? Woanders hat er ziemlich viel Schaden angerichtet, also befürchte ich, dass auch hier seine Änderungen nicht vorteilhaft waren.
freebeer (2017-09-11 08:41:33+00:00): Hallo fkv,
Thank you for bringing this to public attention and poking my old memories.
I have investigated the area against a poor selection of orthophotos and my worse memory and compared achavi to see the changes.  I would not call these changes just simplification, but a loss of accuracy/precision and actual introduction of errors and ambiguity.
I know imagery can be misleading, but a deleted path is clearly visible in a place where the simplified representation would leave me wondering how to continue -- way 437251882.  Further, better rounded curves are now awkward angles and multiple junctions such as near the summit are now schematically represented in a confusing manner, where I would be misled to follow a path to reach a junction which actually would have been on the curve had it been present.
I may well have found the current markings adequate when I was in this area with no 0SM (damn kezb0ard) experience and starting t0 learn a Garmin GPS, perhaps bef0re kn0wing h0w t0 effectively use EGN0S in the treec0ver.  But I cann0t agree the current lack 0f preciseness w0uld be g00d t0day, having just mapped in hurricane areas against z20 and even better z21 imagery and trying t0 d0 my best against that, where the Haselstein Gipfelkreuz cannot even be seen in the imagery I viewed, and the twisted path up to it is shown for simplicity as a straight line (I was too much a beginner to enter my GPS traces back then).
Then again, now it seems m0re pe0ple are mapping using a Handy or tablet with no EGN0S/WAAS, which puts me in the river 0n wh0se banks I sit n0w while my Garmin puts me 0n the 0SM sh0reline/beach.
I never traced fr0m my GPS traces, but had I attempted t0 trace the imagery t0 f0llow the path centre as I w0uld t0day with perhaps better accuracy than the 2m (usually better) GPS/EGN0S error, then I would n0t be happy to see such accuracy deleted.  A m0untain trail does not foll0w a straight line between tw0 points for d0zens 0f metres where earlier d0zens 0f p0ints traced a path cl0ser t0 the curves seen 0n the imagery.
There are 0ther things t0 bother me, unrelated t0 this changeset, such as the p0siti0n of the Prochenberg summit near a basemap.at backgr0und at 1116m, when I th0ught I remembered the summit marked cl0ser t0 the Aussichtsturm years ag0, which is higher than the Gipfelkreuz I photographed against the fascinating (as a valley dweller) sky.
I cann0t see the simplificati0ns f0rced by the later changesets and similar Verschlimmbesserungen elsewhere as an impr0vement, where the accurate truth has been l0st.
Just my 2 Groschen
-- Freibier
t00 lazy to swap kezb0ard when leet-speak d0es the j0b (sort 0f)
fkv (2017-09-12 12:32:25+00:00): Thank you for your statement, but it is quite long and hard to read. Are you (freebeer) = pingufromwoodquarter, and if so, why did you switch to English? Do you suggest a revert of these simplifications, or can you even get it done yourself?
freebeer (2017-09-12 18:32:25+00:00): Hallo,
$MUTTERSPRACHE == English
Also, I hope to catch the attention of some who do not read german.  Ich kann nur Schlechterduutsch schreiben...
After losing a long comment (damn kezboard) again, I have looked at more changesets in the area entitled `Bereinungen Forst & Wiesen Prochenberg' and I feel they should be reverted as like this changeset, and those you mentioned in talk-at, `clean' things thereby losing accuracy which I verified against the imagery.
I am unfamiliar with JOSM, thus I cannot myself perform a revert, but might these simplifications be the result of applying SimplifyWay within?
I disagree with applying this (with which I am not familiar) to the work of others who have made the effort to add the detail and accuracy -- here we are talking of well over a metre difference from reality, and on the roads, curves turned into sharp angles.
The debate belongs elsewhere, but having relocated roads formerly under construction yesterday and trying to smoothly reflect their curves, I would be displeased to see that turned into jagged lines at the detail I worked with.
That has shortened my original long reply :-/
Freibier, kein Pingu
fkv (2017-09-12 19:39:21+00:00): I thought you were Pingu because you found out so quickly that this changeset discussion is going on. It's only the changeset creator that gets an automated notification by default.

As a Merkaartor user, I am no more familiar with JOSM than you, but I agree that the SimplifyWay function was certainly involved. Some users are so fascinated by these funky JOSM functions that they apply them wherever they can.

I know how to do reverts, but I already have a reputation of a paranoid reverter, so you could do me a favor by handing this over to the Data Working Group (data@osmfoundation.org). When you refer to this changeset discussion, please point out that it's not this changeset that we want reverted.
freebeer (2017-09-13 00:23:20+00:00): (Du darfst gern auf deutsch schreiben)
(As you know, changeset comments and discussions are public, and I guess I was just awake at the right time to see yours)

What I wrote earlier, then lost, was that I wanted to know the thinking behind martin0203's actions, which the first changeset comment gave me no clue what, nor why, was being done.
Cleaning/simplifying ones own data like GPS track points taken regularly can be a legitimate use of such a feature.  Luckily my Potlatch has a `straighten way' function which I tried, and indeed, it did reduce a complicated curvy track with comparable switchbacks to the Prochenberg, to a nice straight line between two points, so no danger from that ;-)
I suppose repeated simplification of OSM ways would have the same effect...
I am not aware of martin0203 defending or explaining these actions, but I have not yet looked.  I also hesitate to involve the DWG for what could be over-eager ignorance, as I would rather see community agreement that changing, say a zig-zag line with, say, a metre offset every 10 or 20m is abuse, which is what these Sauberkeit actions to the forest outlines appears to me, introducing small inaccuracies, rather than eliminating redundancies.  As more detail is available to map, these inaccuracies add up.
Must add -- just read the SimplifyWay default is up to 3 metres inaccuracy, when I have been tracing 10cm imagery.  Aieee.
literan (2016-08-15 15:27:56+00:00): правильно не landuse=churchyard, а landuse=religion.
maraf24 (2016-09-04 08:19:39+00:00): W budowie. Oznacza to, że nie ma tu stacji.
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:43:30+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Erelen (2017-01-17 01:21:59+00:00): А на каком именно из четырёх направлений, отходящих от перекрёстка, стоит шлагбаум?
Vachok (2017-01-17 08:07:08+00:00): На север
Vachok (2017-01-17 08:26:17+00:00): Я уточнил - там нет шлагбаума. Исправил.
uvi (2017-02-14 15:32:06+00:00): 
Handelt es sch bei der "Milchtankstelle" http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4350715600um einen Automaten? Dann empfiehlt es sich diesen nach diesem Beispiel einzutragen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264211545
uvi (2017-02-15 12:46:51+00:00): Kommen Waren aus dem Regal, ist m.E. shop=farm mit der description, welche Sachen es dort gibt, korrekt. Sobald ein Automat steht, sollte der doch so auch erscheinen und recherchierbar sein. Da sind dort dann zwei nodes nicht falsch, zum Beispiel das Häuschen als shop=farm (mit allen Daten) und im Häuschen der Automat mit seinen Daten.
Aglis IRM-ED (2020-08-21 06:15:14+00:00): Hi Super-Map. I changed the classification and geometry  of this way based on Maxar Premium Imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/437258574). I also made some change around this changeset. Thank you
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-24 06:35:12+00:00): Hi, Super-Map. I changed the classification of the roads (way 437258160, way 437258550) to be track.
alphensebezorger (2016-10-19 18:50:25+00:00): Hallo dvdhoven,
Zo te zien krijgt in o.a. deze changeset een deel van de N331 de straatnaam Stadshagenallee, terwijl zowel ten noorden als zuiden de naam Hasselterweg staat. Waarschijnlijk is dit een foutje. Het betreft in totaal 5 'ways':
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376356503, de andere weghelft daar, de twee spoorviaducten vlakbij, en een klein stukje op de kruising met de Zwolseweg (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46269877). Weet u of dit inderdaad allemaal Hasselterweg moet zijn? Trouwens, ook de ref=N331 mist op een deel van de Hasselterweg zie ik nu. Ik ben hier niet bekend, kunt u ernaar kijken?
Gegroet, Alphensebezorger.
dvdhoven (2016-10-19 19:13:34+00:00): Bedankt voor de attentie.
Ik pas het aan.
Overigens ben ik geen u, dat was mijn vader :-)
65 jaar, maar nooit u geworden, je kunt me gewoon met je aanspreken, dat voelt prettiger.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Tchiller (2016-08-19 13:04:38+00:00): You have created a dupe to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4350782590 here. Please merge and add the opening hours for the restaurant (Opening hours Restaurant
MI - SA 09:00 - 21:00
SO 09:00 - 18:00
MO & DI closed), and close the OSM note which has been opened here. Thank you very much.
Tchiller (2016-08-19 13:04:59+00:00): You have created a dupe to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41463322 here. Please merge and add the opening hours for the restaurant (Opening hours Restaurant
MI - SA 09:00 - 21:00
SO 09:00 - 18:00
MO & DI closed), and close the OSM note which has been opened here. Thank you very much.
species (2016-08-17 09:12:17+00:00): Du bist dir sicher, dass du das changeset so hochladen wolltest?
lg
species (2016-08-16 15:10:50+00:00): Are you sure the name changed? It was "Sackstraße 15" for some years now...

If you do not react, I will revert this.
Supaplex (2016-08-15 12:46:51+00:00): 這應該在路的東邊或西邊，不在路中央吧？
ndm (2016-08-15 22:55:42+00:00): Layer -1?

Is it really disused -- are the rails visible?
serendipity (2016-08-16 07:53:52+00:00): I was there recently (Aug 2016).  There are no rails visible.  Both ends are bricked up.
Derick Rethans (2016-08-15 10:41:36+00:00): Hi!

This is nowhere near Felthem? Which I think is spelled Feltham? Are you sure it's really hear on Tamar Way on which looks like a residential street?
ChrissW-R1 (2017-10-19 15:42:49+00:00): Please have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1179181
eggie (2019-08-17 08:07:24+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2017-07-23 19:37:22+00:00): Eerste changeset buiten Nederland en daardoor nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze..
Minh Nguyen (2016-08-15 11:09:44+00:00): To clarify, the semicolon-merging and lane-splitting was what happened to this road before I cleaned it up.
esther81 (2016-08-16 11:09:52+00:00): mapa tesoro
highflyer74 (2016-08-16 07:12:51+00:00): Moin!

Kannst Du Dir einmal diese Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37623361 ansehen? Hat die keinen Namen? K 213 ist bereits als ref=* vorhanden...

Gruss aus HB,

Oliver
AMDmi3 (2016-08-15 19:52:31+00:00): Можно поинтересоваться что вы пишете в скобках в названиях улиц и адресах ("Дачная улица (Семчино)")? Такое уточнение нужно только в одном случае - когда в одном населённом пункте есть несколько улиц с одним названием. Тогда уточнение пишется в addr:suburb (и для улиц, и для адресов). В name и addr:street никаких уточнений в скобках быть не должно.
gileri (2016-09-04 17:34:36+00:00): Hello,

For chiringuito "salitre", please only keep the name part and use uppercase caracters, like this : "Salitre".

For "playa para perros L'Estany", please use leisure=dog_park, and keep only the name part in the 'name' tag.

You can look into the wiki or ask me or mailing lists if you have any question about mapping on OSM.
user_5359 (2018-01-06 22:19:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:44:11+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
maraf24 (2016-08-16 07:19:29+00:00): Nazwa była dobra, pułkownika ma być dużą literą.
junbun (2016-08-15 13:15:49+00:00): 補充大度路三段300巷
HubMiner (2017-08-01 00:03:43+00:00): About "Mount Trashmore", could you clarify what are you asking to fix, otherwise take we remove "fixme" tag?
jidanni (2017-08-05 14:53:24+00:00): Add sea level elevation (too), as all proper mountains would have.

Also note if the name Trashmore is the official  government name. (Or add James Park Hill as an alternate name...)
HubMiner (2017-08-22 04:13:56+00:00): Ok, updated.
literan (2016-08-15 15:18:01+00:00): не следует в name писать все подряд. Это только для имен собственных. Также, тегом amenity=fountain обозначается не дырка (точка), откуда вода льется, а вся площади фонтана (и никаких natural=water)
literan (2016-08-15 15:18:51+00:00): ну и, наконец, в воде газон не растет, поэтому надо было сделать мультиполигон, где площадь фонтана будет внутренним (inner) полигоном.
Echo78 (2016-08-16 08:01:55+00:00): По поводу имени понял. С редактированием существующих полигонов пока не совсем разобрался.
Echo78 (2016-08-16 08:10:36+00:00): Получается, полное название (Центр досуга "Даниил") надо в description писать, а в name только "Даниил" (без кавычек)?
Echo78 (2016-08-16 08:32:37+00:00): А как мультиполигон делать (бублик)?
Echo78 (2016-08-16 08:49:11+00:00): Выделить оба и кнопка "C" в первом редакторе (тот, что в браузере, не flash)?
literan (2016-08-16 12:33:30+00:00): насчет редакторов iD и Potlatch - не подскажу (сам пользуюсь JOSM, там все очень просто) - это вам самому надо читать help и разбираться... Что касается названия - у вас сложный пример :-) Сейчас такой консенсус есть: если вид объекта однозначно задается тегом (например, детский сад "Даниил"), то тогда amenity=kindergarten + в name только "Даниил". Если же брать именно центр досуга - то это несколько непонятная сущность, для которой специфического тега нет (если там есть дошкольное образование, то это тоже amenity=kindergarten + name=Центр досуга "Даниил", если образования нет, то скорее всего это amenity=childcare + name=Центр досуга "Даниил".
literan (2016-08-16 12:35:01+00:00): Да, и если слово "детский сад" является частью названия (например "Великолепный детский сад" или "Детский сад №8") - то здесь в name опять же идет все целиком
Harald Hartmann (2017-09-08 19:54:35+00:00): Hi Welshie, i'm wondering about your usage of "source:maxspeed=GB:urban", so can you explain it a little bit? 
PS: There's a general discussion about source:maxspeed at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59664
opendcc (2016-08-15 14:48:49+00:00): Hallo,

road ist nicht ganz korrekt. Was ist es denn genau? Bis zum Hausnummer 1 eine Zufahrt, dann ein Fußweg? Gepflastert?
niki (2016-08-15 18:04:25+00:00): stimmt genau. Erst eine Art Zufahrt, dann Fußweg. Aber über die Beschaffenheit weiß ich nichts. :-(
opendcc (2016-08-15 18:32:31+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe das mal so aufgeteilt - Zufahrt und Fußweg.
highflyer74 (2016-08-16 08:01:05+00:00): Guten Tag und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich musste gerade etwas über den verwendeten Changeset Kommentar schmunzeln. Dort soll eigentlich stehen, was verändert wurde. OSM ist keine Plattform, um sich kommerziell mit Werbesprüchen zu präsentieren. Sollte also (ausser der Selbsteintragung) noch weiteres Interesse an einer Mitarbeit bei OSM bestehen, bitte ich darum, dies zu beachten.

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
AndriesWijma (2016-12-14 16:21:57+00:00): Naamsverandering was onterecht. Het Fries Verzetsmuseum is onderdeel van het Fries Museum. Ik heb ze nu beide een eigen vermelding gegeven.
user_5359 (2016-08-15 18:41:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-16 18:55:42+00:00): Hi,
If the Arches Leisure Centre has closed then you can edit the "leisure" tag to "disused:leisure".  That'll make it clear that it's not currently a leisure centre at the moment (rather than one with "closed" in the name).
You'll need to use an editor at the osm.org website to do that though - maps.me won't be able to.
Loremo (2016-09-13 20:30:45+00:00): Hallo Sandro Tuena
Wenn ich das Richtig sehe ist dir hier ein Fehler passiert und du hast die Gemeinde Adlikon in Adliswil umbenannt. Ist es ok, wenn ich das Rückgängig mache?
Siehe die Änderung hier: http://osmhistory.appspot.com/changeset/41469115
Gruss Jonas
Tarad CGI Studio (2016-08-15 16:08:35+00:00): CGI
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:38:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
fkv (2019-05-23 02:58:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70535407 where the changeset comment is: revert 41469615
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-15 16:41:37+00:00): A classificação para campos de futebot seria leisure=pitch e sport=football
santamariense (2016-08-15 21:46:30+00:00): sport=soccer. football é para o football americano.
santamariense (2016-08-16 01:15:07+00:00): Só para corrigir o que eu disse.... Futebol americano é sport=american_football
streinger (2016-08-15 19:11:23+00:00): на highway=pedestrian никакие ограничения не нужны
Supaplex (2016-08-15 16:59:19+00:00): 重覆了?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3990245177
Tomas Straupis (2016-08-15 18:44:24+00:00): Šis CRAP.ME šlamštas atstatomas.
Øukasz (2017-08-17 21:50:03+00:00): hello

you made the khurmatu-kifri road one-way, meaning there is now no way to go the other way. is it a dual carriage way and the second one needs to be drawn, or is it a single one and the one way tag should be removed?

thank you
patzi (2016-08-17 07:39:40+00:00): Moin,
gibt es einen besonderen Grund dafür, dass Du die Infos von Wegen teilweise auf einen neuen Punkt übertragen hast? Du hättests ja auch die neuen Infos auf bereits existierende Flächen übertragen können.
Wenn es da keinen besonderen Grund für gibt, würde ich die Infos von dem neuen Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4351445080 wieder auf die Fläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230975939 übertragen.

Grüße :)
nebulon42 (2016-08-17 17:56:59+00:00): Hi, ja es gibt schon einen Grund. Für mich gehören zur monitoring_station eigentlich nur die Instrumente und nicht das ganze Gelände inkl. Gebäude etc. Ich versuche meist die Wetterhütte mit einem Punkt zu bezeichnen, auch weil die Instrumente teilweise über das Gelände verteilt sind. Auf der Fläche würde man die Messtation ein wenig mit der Einrichtung "Wetterwarte" vermischen. Darüber kann man natürlich diskutieren und es gibt sicher verschiedene Meinungen. Im konkreten Fall ist die Ausdehnung aber überschaubar und ich möchte da auch nicht diesem Detail so viel Bedeutung beimessen. Ich überlasse es also dir das so zu ändern oder zu lassen wie du es für richtig hältst. Nur den Namen "Wetterwarte" halte ich bei einer monitoring_station, monitoring:weather=yes für redundant.

vG