piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
poschon (2017-03-15 22:11:22+00:00): Hello Martin, 

Grazie for the feedback. I will follow the unwritten low in case of duplicates to delete the imported address. At the next time I will search more deeply for a community. My big mistake is: I looked just for Modena. The wiki side for Regio Emilia does not include the word Modena.

According to house number:
Before I did the import. I checked the wiki (Eng., German and Russ.) and I found the format 2A or 2a and never 2/A or 2/a. In the Italian map are existing bot formats. I would like follow the format 2A and 2a. In case of 100/1 is a different discussion. Do you have differed knowledge?
And Yes the search function is not able to find the adress with the format ”/”.

You can try the following existing addresses:
Okay: Largo di Porta Bologna 48 Modena
Not Okay: Largo di Porta Bologna 48/A Modena

Grazie
Poschon
dieterdreist (2017-03-16 01:15:32+00:00): the shortcomings of the search should be reported to Nominatim (the geocoding software on osm.org). Contacting the local community about the import: best way is probably to ask on the national mailing list, they can refer to a regional mailing list (if there is). There is also an international mailing list for imports.
Regina Phalange (2017-03-16 08:58:07+00:00): Sorry for being late. I'm not much happy about this changeset, as I've seen the source in the past and I wasn't very amused about the quality. The house numbers are very often misplaced around the buildings, or even in the near buildings. If the general feeling is neutral though, I'm not going to insist on reverting the change, because I understand this numbers can help give a rough idea where things are.

I'm strongly against changing the addr:housenumber format. If you add a comma in your query, the node comes out just fine (example, http://imgur.com/a/GJI92). I'm not sure about the rest of Italy (I never cared to notice until now, sorry), but in Modena the number on the plate is written in the format 1/A, so in my opinion changing this would result in wrong data.

Thank you for your time
dieterdreist (2017-03-17 10:47:36+00:00): I think there is likely not a rule or if there is, it is not enforced, you can find different kind of 3/A, 3/a, 3a, 3A and there also are very frequent uses of the slash to make a list, e.g. 3/5/7 (for the house numbers 3 and 5 and 7) and there also are variants like 3/2 (which has to be read similar like 3/B). Anyway, I reconfirm not to change these numbers, and when written in countryspecific scheme (with the ",")  they are found: http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Largo%20di%20Porta%20Bologna%2C%2048%2FA%20Modena#map=19/44.64464/10.93042
poschon (2017-03-18 12:54:56+00:00): ciao,

the format for the numbers is important. I agree with you. Today I did a small walk around Modena. I saw just the Format <Number><Letter> without ”/”. 

Here are some pictures from plates and in upper left corner the position of this plate on the map:
https://owncloud.weberhost.de/public.php?service=files&t=bce1585ecf60536791130d18128b81c7
@Regina: Do you have other examples?
At the moment I changed nothing (related to the address) since the import.

Poschon
Regina Phalange (2017-03-19 11:41:38+00:00): Ok I'm really sorry because you are totally right about the plates. However the "/" format is default when you talk about addresses, as you can see here https://www.paginegialle.it/serramenti-infissi-klimainfissi-modena , http://www.immobiliaredonatello.it/it/contatti.html and (not Modena though) http://www.sushiko.it/it/ristoranti/sushiko-rubiera-re-rubiera . Right now I can't find any other examples because no other activity comes to my mind, but I'm pretty sure the format is always the same. Maybe it's Italian mail service related?
SomeoneElse (2017-08-22 10:12:35+00:00): Hello poschon,
What is the point of the "information=add" data that you have added to every node here? Were these tags discussed anywhere before the import took place?
Best Regards,
See also the very negative comments about this import at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/thread.html#57524 
Andy
bhousel (2017-03-02 01:27:47+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
AMDmi3 (2017-03-03 16:56:47+00:00): Название улиц обязательно нужно писать со статусной частью (т.е. "улица Энергетиков")
Supaplex (2017-03-02 17:54:09+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
wonderstar (2017-03-02 01:26:02+00:00): Comment Incorrect above. Change set description should read:
Added Pedestrian Footpath.
alexey_zakharenkov (2017-03-06 16:00:58+00:00): Здравствуйте.
По-моему, удаляя тег name, вы обедняете карту топографически значимой информацией. Вот вы удалили "name=Нотариальная контора" у amenity=notary. А ведь такие места могли называться ещё "Нотариус" или "Услуги нотариуса", но на вывеске значится именно "Нотариальная контора", и на основе именно этого названия происходит сопоставление объекта на местности и на карте.
Магазины shop=florist действительно часто называется "Цветы", а могли бы называться "Цветики", "Цветочки" или "Цветик-семицветик". Почему "name=Цветы" надо удалять, если на магазине именно такая вывеска? Ведь она даже не является прямым переводом слова florist.
Alexander-II (2017-03-08 03:27:36+00:00): Привет. Руководствуюсь https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
Если конкретнее, то интересней всего заголовок "2.3 Имя - это название и только"

Если тезисно, то: 1) name - только для имен собственных 2) В общем случае, тег имени не заполняется, если тег(и) обозначения объекта и то, что предполагается поместить в name=* - полностью взаимозаменяемы. Например, shop=bakery и "Хлеб". 3) Внося что-либо с вывесок, не следует доводить ситуацию до абсурда и копировать буквально всё, что на них нанесено, так как многие вывески содержат не имя, а, например, указание ассортимента или оказываемой услуги. Примеры таких вывесок: "Туалет", "Прием стеклотары", "Мороженое", "Изготовление ключей", "Чистка обуви". Все эти заведения можно обозначить без использования словесных описаний в name=* или description=*.
Владимир К (2017-05-02 14:01:19+00:00): Что-то пошло не так. Декабристов улица стала на поле.
pangoSE (2018-08-21 09:09:37+00:00): Is this really industrial? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/477999835#map=16/62.9133/17.8403
nevw (2017-03-02 09:56:06+00:00): The Openstreetmap is a public map so please don't put your friends names on the houses.
Thanks
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:59:11+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment. See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html
mueschel (2017-03-07 09:23:15+00:00): Please don't change the established wikipedia tag to things like 
described-in-wikipedia
described_in_wikipedia
listed_in_wikipedia
listed-in-wikipedia
and so on. Such changes have to be discussed first.

Jan
nyuriks (2017-03-07 14:20:17+00:00): Hi, you are right that they need to be more organized. I made a proposal for it https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikipedia_tag_types

Also, thanks to wikidata, we can clean up wikipedia tags now (almost 2,000 already done):
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yurik/OSM_wiki_tag_problems
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:59:17+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment. See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:53:35+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment.
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:54:21+00:00): See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:59:47+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment. See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-09-30 10:39:54+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1545511 ?
mavl (2019-01-18 16:42:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-18 16:42:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 11:00:05+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment. See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html
mavl (2019-01-18 16:42:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-18 16:42:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-18 16:42:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-18 16:42:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-18 16:42:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-18 16:42:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-18 16:42:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 11:00:10+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment. See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html
mavl (2017-03-02 17:20:48+00:00): Летом тоже можно объехать это здание (там с западной стороны дома, где почта, асфальт шириной 1-1,5 полосы).
majkaz (2017-03-02 10:03:32+00:00): Ahoj,
spíš jen upozornění - pokud ty chodníky nepřipojíš k silnici, přechodům a vzájemně nenavazují, jsou pro pěší navigace absolutně nepoužitelné a "jen" se ukážou na mapě. 
A pokud jdou souběžně se silnicí (klasický chodník oddělený obrubníkem) je z tohohle důvodu podle mě lepší je nemapovat samostatně, ale jen rozdělit tu silnici tam, kde chodník začíná a končí a přidat na ní sidewalk=right/left/both. 
Ty chodníky okolo Géčka jsou toho zářným příkladem, je třeba je provázat přes přechody vzájemně, pokud tedy mají zůstat zmapované jako samostatné cesty, připojit k silnicím nebo změnit jen na "vlastnost" silnice která se o to propojení postará sama.
sannorra (2017-03-02 14:30:56+00:00): Tak je to opravene, dekuji za upozorneni
mavl (2017-10-08 17:52:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52735183 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46495251].
bhousel (2017-03-02 14:41:44+00:00): Thank you for your contribution, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Constable (2017-03-03 10:48:56+00:00): Sir, did you see this https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/911451 ?
dieterdreist (2017-03-03 10:58:06+00:00): This should be reverted ASAP. Undiscussed import. Wrong source in changeset comment. See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2017-March/057524.html
mavl (2017-10-08 17:53:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52735183 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46495251].
Владимир К (2017-03-06 09:10:59+00:00): Что это за монстр? чем вы объясните эти теги??
mavl (2017-10-08 17:52:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52735183 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46495251].
Supaplex (2017-03-02 17:54:36+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-10-08 17:52:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52735183 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46495251].
ccamara (2017-03-07 07:50:22+00:00): En este changeset hay varios patios que están etiquetados como "name=patio". La etiqueta "name" se utiliza para poner el nombre oficial de un lugar (ej: Centro Joaquín Roncal) (ver wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name). Si lo que quieres es indicar que algo es un patio quizá sea mejor usar la etiqueta "note" (note=patio) (ver wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:note)
mavl (2019-01-18 16:42:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-08 17:52:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52735183 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46495251].
aq123 (2017-03-12 17:24:01+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Похоже большую часть улиц вы просто заменили.
Уточните, пожалуйста, какие данные использовались. Откуда это всё?
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-03-10 10:26:05+00:00): Proszę nie psuć poprawnej adresacji. Miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic mają specyficzny sposób oznaczania. Proszę się zapoznać z tym postem: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
mavl (2017-10-08 17:53:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52735183 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46495251].
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-02 12:28:29+00:00): One thing I've been meaning to do more of is indoor mapping - room=shop (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:room) combined with POI tagging kind of thing - http://openlevelup.net/ shows the results. For places around Rundle Mall, it might be a handy tool
Qwertii (2017-03-03 06:28:39+00:00): Oh cool, I was wondering how multilevel buildings would be mapped.
mavl (2017-10-08 17:52:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52735183 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46495251].
nigelramsay (2017-03-02 08:45:58+00:00): There seem to be some issues with the roads in the vicinity of Poplar Avenue, Raumati and the new Kapiti Expressway. This evening I noticed that southbound "way" that passes over Poplar Ave was marked as one-way, but from south to north. 

I corrected this, and have been trying to get a journey from Wellington to Auckland use the Expressway with one of the OSM Routing engines. Fail.

Fortunately, it appears that North to South journeys are correctly using the Expressway. 

One other thing - I believe that there should be a connector from the Poplar Ave roundabout to the northbound lane of the Expressway. I may be mistaken, but I'm reasonably sure it exists. 

Anyway, very happy to help sort this out. Any comments anyone else?
Anonix35 (2017-03-10 19:46:01+00:00): Je ne sais pas si on peut vraiment considerer cette route comme une voie rapide, surtout que vous l'avez que d'un coté à un endroit
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-15 00:33:42+00:00): Hi, Tien Tran. I modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/478030920) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-16 00:50:12+00:00): I also modified these roads https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/478030912

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/478030913

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/478030915
Talitha IRM-ED (2020-11-11 01:28:25+00:00): Hi, Tien Tran. I have adjusted the unclassified road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/478030920) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. Thank you
Talitha IRM-ED (2020-11-11 02:28:04+00:00): I also adjusted this unclassified road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/478030919) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. Thank you
mavl (2017-10-08 17:52:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52735183 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46495251].
Arma IRM-ED (2020-09-16 00:55:16+00:00): Hi, Tien Tran. I changed classification of this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/478031880) and adjusted it based on Maxar Premium Imagery.
sbiribizio (2017-03-05 13:07:44+00:00): Ciao,
vedo che hai cambiato il mode della relazione da Torino a torino.  C'e' una ragione per averlo messo in minuscolo?
Saluti
sbiribizio (2017-03-05 13:09:08+00:00): Devi comprendere che le modifiche che fai non sono locali, ma sono globali. La mappa e le informazioni che contiene cambiano e le tue modifiche risultano visibili a tutti.
Kazing (2017-03-02 10:27:58+00:00): Hello, thanks for your contribution. I think there is already an object for this market place : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23887733
You should add informations to this way instead of creating a new node.
Also you cannot adding a point with just a name, you need to add tag like (amenity, highway etc...)
Regards
GRUBERND (2017-03-02 16:15:24+00:00): looking through some of those edits: how come "Winter" should equal "Dec-Feb" and "Summer" was changed to "Jun-Aug"?
both assumptions do not reflect reality.
so.. why the change?
MapGardener (2017-03-02 19:13:41+00:00): I've also picked only some changes and had a closer look at them. Without knowing the actual opening hours, most of them seem to be useful improvements. Unfortunately, the changeset is huge and looks quite overwhelming. Hence, I probably cannot review all changes systematically. As GRUBERND said, there are some substantial errors regarding seasons. Take node 3594330289 or 420462131, for example. Both nodes used to contain data which is, afaik, not defined in the Wiki but these changes definitely introduce some further errors. On most other nodes I've reviewed, the changes just seem to eliminate German terms and abbreviations but "summer" does not directly translate to "Jun-Aug". 
Were these changes automatically generated?
parukhin (2017-03-03 10:58:36+00:00): Yes, "Winter" to "Dec-Feb" and "Summer"  to "Jun-Aug" is a semiautomatic JOSM correction. What is it "Summer" and "Winter" in Germany? I find this examle in German wiki "Winterzeit 8-18, Sommerzeit: 7-20: Mar Su[-1] - Oct Su[-1]-1 days: 07:00-20:00; Oct Su[-1] - Mar Su[-1]-1 days: 08:00-18:00"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours This is correct?
Now i'm revert these changes back to "Summer" and "Winter".
GRUBERND (2017-03-03 13:01:54+00:00): thank you very much! the problem with the values "winter" and "summer" is that they have a seasonal meaning. for example some amenity=drinking_water will be shut down some time between September/October until March/April. but the dates are not really clear.
in some cases (toilets in skiing areas) the "winter" just means "as long as the skiing area is in active use.

so reverting those values would be very helpful - for precision and also to not hide this problem in the opening_hours scheme.
MKnight (2017-03-10 10:49:04+00:00): winter and summer should not (auto)corrected without more knowledge about. Josm is mostly wrong in this case.

winter (and summer) has (min) 2 meanings:
dec-feb (winter) or winter time= End of Oct to end of Mar.

parukhin: please reverse the changes in Germany and other too. For example in #45944320 there are 15 winter/summer-changes of you.
MKnight (2017-08-06 19:58:02+00:00): reverted in #46516476
mavl (2017-10-08 17:52:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52735183 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46495251].
GinaroZ (2017-03-02 12:48:41+00:00): If you are changing the bit under the railway into a tunnel then you need to remove the bridge from the railway. You shouldn't have both bridge and tunnel crossing, it's either one or the other :)
Stephan Matthiesen (2017-03-02 19:46:58+00:00): Thanks, good point. Are there any criteria what counts as tunnel and as bridge? It is about 2m wide but 8m long, so I'd call it tunnel or underpass rather than bridge.
Kazing (2017-03-02 10:51:44+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir supprimé les clotures et la voie d'accès ? Il s'agit de détails en effet (c'est du micromapping https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Micromapping) mais ces données ont été ajouté et c'est dommage de les perdre. Chacun peut cartographier dans le niveau de détail qu'il souhaite, mais il n'est pas correct de supprimer des données alors qu'elles refletent la réalité du terrain.
Paul Vicich (2017-03-16 09:07:26+00:00): Bonjour. Avant tout, désolé pour le retard de  ma réponse. Cette modification a été réalisée dans le cadre de l'atelier multimédia que j'anime chaque jeudi à la salle des associations. Vous avez raison, notre but n'était pas de supprimer du travail d'autrui. Nous avons juste rencontré un problème en tentant d'éditer un plan de ville sur MapOSMatic. Le résultat étant décevant (trop de fouillis), nous avons pensé que d'enlever du détail améliorerait le résultat, ce qui n'a pas été le cas. Si cela vous tente, vous pouvez pousser la porte un jeudi (9h30 à 11h30) et nous pourrons remettre ensemble avec plaisir les objets supprimés. Cordialement. Paul Vicich, Josée Amielh, Michel Bonvin, Andrée Ferran, Andrée Coulouvrat.
mrpulley (2017-06-19 23:22:09+00:00): Regarding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478036874 - I walked past the southern end of this way last week but didn't see anything. (I didn't go past the northern end.) Could you please confirm the source for this way? It's not on the LPI base map, or on the map on the signs at the start of the walk. Thanks.
explorewiki (2017-06-21 07:17:10+00:00): Actually you're right. The path wasn't well defined at the southern end, yet at the northern end it was visible. I took a GPX trace as I was walking it. I will actually go ahead and remove this track as, like you said, it is not on the the national park signs at the start of the track.
mrpulley (2017-06-22 07:49:00+00:00): Thanks.
mavl (2019-01-18 16:43:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Parzelle13 (2018-03-27 20:39:47+00:00): Hallo mein Freund, nochmals die Frage woher nimmst du die Informationen deiner Hausnummern? Die widersprechen allen allen amtlichen Karten und sind zumindest bei den von mir kommentierten Fällen somit Teil doppelt vergeben.

mfg
Graf Westerholt (2017-03-04 06:51:47+00:00): So lange da noch Kaisers dran steht, und das tut es, ist und bleibt der Name Edeka! Man kann Operator=Edeka oder so eintragen, aber noch nicht name=Edeka!
Graf Westerholt (2017-03-04 06:53:14+00:00): name=Kaisers natürlich
Graf Westerholt (2017-03-04 06:53:47+00:00): Ich meinte, der Name bleibt so lange Kaisers.
user_367191 (2017-03-05 06:00:36+00:00): Bei dem Qualitätsanspruch: wehe du änderst das auch nur einen Tag zu spät ;)
user_367191 (2017-03-05 06:04:48+00:00): Und "Edeka" ist hier eher "brand=" als "operator="
Graf Westerholt (2017-03-05 06:45:14+00:00): OSM sollte den höchsten Qualitätsanspruch haben.
Carnildo (2017-03-02 21:08:21+00:00): Thanks for your work improving the map!

The usual way to map a school is to place the name of the school on the school grounds, but to not name school buildings unless they have their own, different name (eg. the "So-and-So Memorial Gymnasium").
Polarbear (2017-03-08 18:40:11+00:00): Selective revert of the separation of waterways from border lines (CS 46688164).
The roundabout w204728237 was not visible neither in bing nor Bing, exceptional source:geometry set according to previous changeset comments and GPS evidence (CS 46688307).
Selective revert of the separation of Coa Road from border lines, which caused cycle routes going over border lines instead of roads (CS 46688805).
nyuriks (2017-03-22 07:34:26+00:00): Please check the fixme in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47060050