piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Strubbl (2021-09-15 18:12:58+00:00): Hi Pferdo, das ist gut zu wissen. Du könntest sie mir mailen oder bei einem Bilderdienst hochladen. Ich habe gesehen, dass einige Mapper den Dienst https://imgbb.com benutzen.

Mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111257320 habe ich die zuvor gemappten Wege wieder entfernt und den von dir beschriebenen Weg hinzugefügt.

Viele Grüße
Sven
Pferdo (2021-09-17 11:37:50+00:00): Hallo Sven,

https://nextcloud.ich-war-hier.de/index.php/s/7KpwA6j8f9cQHTP

Bitte Bescheid geben, wenn du diese heruntergeladen hast. Ich will nicht Übergriffig sein, aber ich bin auch noch Mal extra 9 km Hingefahren heute... ;) der Serviceweg o.ä. an der Südkante des Gebietes ist nicht mehr existent, da steht im Osten bereits ein Haus darauf ;)

Die Bilder bis zur Draufsicht des kompletten Radweges sind alle legal (Anstand/Höhe/Lizenz). Die 3 späteren vom Rückflug könnten diese Anforderungen nicht ganz erfüllen und dienen lediglich dem kurzfristign Eindruck. Grüße
Strubbl (2021-09-17 16:49:15+00:00): Wow, vielen Dank. Den Download habe ich schon mal. Aber noch keine Zeit mich damit zu befassen.
Strubbl (2022-01-13 18:43:20+00:00): Danke nochmals für die Bilder. Heute habe ich endlich Zeit gefunden, sie in JOSM zu laden und darauf zu kartieren. Siehe CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116118787
Pferdo (2022-01-13 19:17:36+00:00): Ganz vielen Dank!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Canal des Pangalanes (2021-09-15 19:35:53+00:00): Please use better changeset comments than "edit": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
maraf24 (2021-09-14 17:19:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7162529619
Nie wiem skąd ludzie mają problemy z tymi garażami na parterze. Przecież nawet na orto z 2018 roku widać, że nie są pod ziemią.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:31:27+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:31:37+00:00): Привет и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!

Не могли бы вы объяснить, какой у вас источник для ваших дополнений? Я уверен, что добавленные вами имена не видны на аэрофотоснимках.

С уважением,
Энди Привет и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!

Не могли бы вы объяснить, какой у вас источник для ваших дополнений? Я уверен, что добавленные вами имена не видны на аэрофотоснимках.

С уважением,
Энди
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-09-14 14:21:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Gebouwen worden niet zelf ingetekend, maar periodiek geïmporteerd van uit het Kadaster.
Je kunt dan een aanvraag doen via het forum van OSM om dat te bespoedigen in het draadje 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Alle begin is moeilijk 
Dit kan pas als de bouw is gestart name=adres zal niet kloppen net als isolated dwelling. 
Dat is een plaatsbepaling van een gehuchtje dat bestaat uit een huis met een koeienstal ergens in de Schotse Hooglanden.
Ik kijk even in de BAG en zal wat aanpassen.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-14 14:34:48+00:00): BAG importverzoek loopt https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=841030#p841030


Welk adres heeft dit pand?
eggie (2021-09-14 15:15:25+00:00): Ahh 15.. staat op de omtrek.
eggie (2021-09-14 20:26:57+00:00): In de BAG is nog niets ingevoerd... wanneer het pand er daadwerkelijk staat even om import vragen svp.
Het pand 15a is wel geimporteerd.
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2021-09-14 14:43:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip: Gebouwen hebben bij import vanuit de BAG de adresnodes al meegekrege. Beter dus niet één separaat adres op het hele gebouw zetten.
Ik zal het adres weer verwijderen. 
Met de losse adresnodes kun je overigens gewoon schuiven. 
Mocht een adres ontbreken dan doorgeven aan het Kadaster.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-14 14:45:58+00:00): Removed address from buildingshape.
aweech (2021-09-14 19:23:04+00:00): Hi,
There isn't a little path here. The asphalt connects through to the other side and there is a barrier. The barrier is tagged with motor_vehicle=no because it looks like it is immovable. Please stop drawing a little path here.
mubbasa (2021-09-15 11:05:48+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. I really appreciate the information provided. Apologies, for classifying the road segment as "path".
Going ahead, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors. Thanks again, looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
mubbasa
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-09-14 15:54:41+00:00): Dag TvdB
Je hebt nu busway=track toegevoegd.
Dat zal niets uithalen.

De juiste tagging voor busway is tegenwoordig 
highway=busway en dat impliceert al access=no 
Voorheen werden busbanen als highway=service ingetekend. 
Bij busstations ligt het soms anders en wordt soms nog wel service gebruikt.
Bus-only service roads 	These are short service roads connecting to bus-specific facilities (such as bus garages) off of the main carriageway. 	
Bus garage
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbusway

je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111190377
Kennelijk negeert jullie app access=no

Of dat bij een highway=busway ook het geval is?  Geen idee. Het zou dan ook niet mogen routeren. 
budway=track zal in ieder geval verwijderen  en psv=yes  omzetten in bus=yes.
Wellicht pakt HVC wel de psv tags omdat die gebuik mag maken van busbanen zoals taxi's .
 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-14 15:57:43+00:00): psv=yes heb ik omgezet naar bus=yes

Wie weet..
osmmichl (2025-03-02 17:01:23+00:00): Hi LvdT,
from your tagging ...
---
| natural=spring
| volcano=yes
| water_characteristic=mud
---
... I conclude that this is a hot spring? 

Based on ... 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dhot_spring
... I suggest this: 
---
| natural=hot_spring
| (volcano: DLETED)
| water_characteristic=mud
---
Best regards, OsmMichl
LvdT (2025-03-02 17:16:34+00:00): No, this is not a hot spring, this is mud volcano (salsa) a phenomenon that is not geothermal in origin, but rather to the presence of hydrocarbons in the soil. This is the best tagging I could find for this sort of thing.
osmmichl (2025-03-02 19:38:53+00:00): Oh, thank you for explaining - interesting for me. 
With your description I found it in Wikipedia: 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mud_volcano
itineris (2022-01-02 14:51:02+00:00): Szia!

Véletlenül törölted útdíjas szakaszok végpontjait. Kérlek, legközelebb jobban figyelj oda!

Köszönöm:
Ákos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
DD1GJ (2021-09-14 19:08:36+00:00): Hallo He Schu,

willkommen bei OSM dun Danke für Deine ortskundigen Änderungen. Fernradwege wie der Saale-Radweg werden als Relation erfasst und werden auf entsprechenden Radkarten dargestellt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2153839

https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=2153839

Ich habe daher Deine Benennungen rückgängig gemacht. Weitere Informationen zu OSM findest Du z.B. bei https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Wetterauer (2021-09-15 08:15:42+00:00): These changes are incorrect. Please reverse them. We record according to OTG rule and not according to which satellite is the best.
sbelemey (2021-09-16 14:20:47+00:00): Hi!
thank you for your feedback.
I noticed that my changes have been corrected.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/4940062108
Best regards!
parukhin (2021-10-17 20:09:47+00:00): Андрей, точно корпус 11?
Zagoskin Andrey (2021-11-11 20:21:49+00:00): Добрый день! Извините, что долго не отвечал.
Химиков 21к11 в 2гис, Яндекс.Картах и https://dom.mingkh.ru/arhangelskaya-oblast/arhangelsk/962691
parukhin (2021-11-11 21:25:10+00:00): Доброй ночи. Ничего страшного, спасибо, что нашли время.
Я посмотрел уже на аншлаг, там какая-то смесь, но к11 тоже есть, хоть и немного странная нумерация.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
hackthemap (2021-09-14 14:01:11+00:00): Hi, thanks for your additions!

Are you sure the smoothness tag makes sense on a point here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4816620113 ?
Maybe it was meant for the way this entrance is part of?
DianaDemchuk (2021-09-14 14:27:39+00:00): Hey! This change was made due to a tagging error. You may want to re-read the OSM manual to be sure of the entry tagging rules. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_entrance
hackthemap (2021-09-14 20:21:06+00:00): Oh sorry! I thought it was your change.
Thanks for the quick reply!
SomeoneElse (2021-09-16 14:03:28+00:00): Presumably this changeset comment belongs on a changeset in the USA somewhere, and a different one should be used for this one in Newbury?
VitKlim (2021-09-16 15:20:15+00:00): Hello SomeoneElse. Could you clarify what certainly confused you?
SomeoneElse (2021-09-16 16:28:07+00:00): I'm confused that you've either (a) just used the wrong changeset comment or (b) you're copying data from an external site that includes data that isn't licence-compatible with OSM (your Arcgis site claims a source of "Esri UK, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P, USGS").
VitKlim (2021-09-17 10:39:20+00:00): Sorry that i confused you. You are right. I accidentally added wrong information in comment  with changing in USA.
SomeoneElse (2021-09-17 11:48:20+00:00): Thanks.  What should the changeset comment have been?
VitKlim (2021-09-18 11:48:47+00:00): Added road name based on Bing and customer feedback
SomeoneElse (2021-09-18 12:06:52+00:00): Thanks
VitKlim (2021-09-20 04:42:57+00:00): Thanks for your help in drawing up the correct map.
Jakka (2021-09-15 13:47:36+00:00): attention il y a déjà "amenity=fire_station" caserne ... sur surface building vous ajouter double... pas bon
claire isf (2021-09-15 15:16:16+00:00): En effet ! Tu as raison... Ce sont mes premiers pas sur OSM :-).  Merci de tes conseils !
Jakka (2021-09-15 15:30:01+00:00): pas de problème, corriger et c'est bon ;)
claire isf (2021-09-15 16:01:47+00:00): trop cool ! Merci !
eggie (2021-09-14 14:52:52+00:00): Alle man_made= tower zijn inmiddels omgetagd naar man_made =mast
soms antenna  (ligt eraan.

Beter dus die tag gebruiken voor de 'communicatietorens'
Je krijgt anders op sommige kaarten kerktorens te zien. 
Kijk je nog even?

De meeste masten zijn een bulkimport van vele jaren geleden en er zal nog weinig van kloppen. 
Kijk steeds wanneer de laatste mapper iets heeft gedaan. 
Dat was lokale mapper HenkL in 2018.
Kijk je nog even naar je towers ?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-14 16:07:48+00:00): 'k Zie nu man_made=antenna staan.. Dus dat lijkt me correct.
Je kunt HenkL ook even vragen. Die was de voorgaande mapper.
gr eggie
tonyf1 (2021-10-12 21:35:01+00:00): Hi, this changeset has at least one bad edit and is at risk of reversion if you do not act https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2021-October/015093.html
tonyf1 (2022-12-19 10:59:43+00:00): Hi, you have a number of vehicle roads in Bunurong Park tagged bicycle=no This seems inconsistent with their publicity: "you are welcome to enjoy the grounds, ... or explore this unique property by bike" https://smct.org.au/our-locations/about-bunurong-memorial-park. Do you have any evidence for the tag?
DUGA (2022-07-24 03:55:39+00:00): If you cannot keep OSM up to date, then do not close any road just because you think they will not be reopened.

https://www.skooknews.com/2021/06/penndot-announces-road-work-scheduled_19.html
ivanbranco (2021-09-18 08:20:04+00:00): This highway is unclassified or track?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/979758483/history
whb (2023-04-24 11:21:44+00:00): Hallo sbelemey,

diesen Änderungssatz habe ich komplett rückgängig gemacht, denn alle Änderungen sind falsch:

1. Der Weg endet hier und ist nicht verbunden, er war sogar von mir entsprechend mit einem noexit=yes gekennzeichnet:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2265712175

2. Der komplette Weg ist eine Einbahnstraße, somit auch dieses Teilstück:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983209558
Es handelt sich um die Ausfahrt einer Tiefgarage.

Bitte unterlasse solche Änderungen ohne Ortskenntnisse.

Vielen Dank
whb
sbelemey (2023-04-26 07:09:15+00:00): Hello!
Thanks for your remarks. I'll be more careful in the future at make changes.

best regards, 
sbelemey
obst96 (2021-09-14 15:23:48+00:00): Moin. Mir ist da kein "Werder" Fanclub bekannt. Ist das eine Spaß änderung?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111194822
klippenhuhn (2021-09-14 16:43:37+00:00): Ein bekannter von mir ist ein Werder Fan und wohnt dort.
MxxCon (2021-09-16 02:28:08+00:00): What is this changeset?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111194970
noelbov (2021-09-14 13:52:50+00:00): Dag Mich4711
Het wegsegment (15 nodes) tussen die voorrangsborden is éénrichting getagged (door jou?).
Daardoor is de fietsknooppuntroute van 21 naar 22 niet meer toegelaten.
Is er een alternatief voor deze fietsrichting?
Dank voor antwoord. nb.
emilinthelowlands (2021-09-16 14:18:44+00:00): Hmm, ik heb zojuist het segment nagekeken en kon geen problemen vinden (maar heb voor de zekerheid over het hele segment, waar van toepassing, aangeduid dat fietsers beide rijrichtingen mogen volgen). Zou je misschien kunnen aanduiden waar het probleem zich precies voordoet? Alvast bedankt voor je oplettendheid!
noelbov (2021-09-16 16:32:18+00:00): Hallo, ik ben misschien te ongeduldig geweest, maar omdat ik van u nog geen reactie had gekregen had ik gisteravond besloten de enkelrichting-tag op dat segment weg te doen, bevestigd door fietsnet en vlaanderen-fietsland trouwens. Daar is nu inderdaad geen probleem meer.
Bedankt voor de reactie.
emilinthelowlands (2021-09-16 18:59:46+00:00): Blij dat alles opgelost is, het ziet er prima uit ;).
Reitstoen (2021-09-14 12:58:12+00:00): Hei!
Ser du har tagget disse med camp_site.
Men jeg regner med du egentlig er ute etter taggen picnic_site. You fix? :)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=picnic%20site?uselang=en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=camp%20site?uselang=en
Virre Vapp (2021-09-14 19:55:40+00:00): Det skal jeg prøve å få ordna :)
chap donya (2021-09-14 13:27:40+00:00): تنها چاپخانه 24 ساعته جنوب ایران
maraf24 (2021-09-14 17:01:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101654376
Nie rozumiem tego łączenia wielu budynków w jeden obrys. Jeszcze gdyby to było building:part, ale tak jak jest teraz znika informacja o podziałach konstrukcyjnych.
Mordechai23 (2021-09-14 17:04:13+00:00): to jest jeden budynek, gdzie garaż przechodzi przez całą szerokość i nie stanowi oddzielnego budynku
maraf24 (2021-09-14 17:13:35+00:00): Nawet gdyby to była prawda, to każdą część, która usunąłeś, należało zmienić na bulding:part, bo każda ma inną charakterystykę.
Z tego też względu nie wydaje mi się, by to był jeden budynek. Za duży i za duża różnica wysokości między częściami.
alexashh (2021-09-17 05:59:05+00:00): Привет! А что было не так с тегами? 

highway=bus_stop ставится на остановку, а не на дорогу.
Денис Безыкорнов (2021-09-17 11:59:54+00:00): Да, действительно накосячил. Исправил и передвинул место конечной остановки в правильное положение.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 10:47:55+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on Bing aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
kapazao (2021-09-14 22:05:58+00:00): Buenas, por favor no uses Bing para ajustar geometrías, usa PNOA que es como lo tenemos en la mayoría de sitios, sino se desajustan las cosas.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111197142
Iván_ (2021-09-18 10:08:34+00:00): Hola, con Vespucci, no vi la opción de añadir PNOA.

He revisado con JOSM, parece OK, hace falta alguna corrección extra?
gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111197142
kapazao (2021-09-18 13:16:32+00:00): Ya lo corregí, no pasa nada.
Gracias por la respuesta, un saludo.
Super-Map (2021-09-16 05:22:08+00:00): Hi laurent-38,

Thanks for your help, contribution, however, there is no building here on the way: "Way: 983226071" it's a parking we haven't yet the imagery at this time, however, before to delete something, please read all informations, in this case it was on the node: "8675229485". Node history link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8675229485/history
So, please take care next time if you want to delete something... can you reverse what you have done? By advance thanks for your understanding. Have a nice day.

Super-Map

PS: Supers Map, because it is and very "serious"...
laurent-38 (2021-09-16 08:16:32+00:00): Hello,

You're right, I'm sorry.
I used Maxar Imagery, which is generally the most up to date, and I misinterpreted what I saw. The center of parking is red, I thought it was the roof of a building.

I'll fix that in a few hours. I plan to keep the service road as seen in Maxar, and draw an area for parking.

Cheers
~~
laurent
laurent-38 (2021-09-16 10:05:47+00:00): Please check fix in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111283148
Super-Map (2021-09-16 12:30:02+00:00): Thanks, it will be good until we have the imagery... for now, it's "perfect"! Just what need all contributors and "beyond" '-) Have a nice day.
ivanbranco (2021-09-22 11:30:15+00:00): Hi Niranjan_S,

what's the meaning of cbse=yes?
user_1566574 (2022-01-28 18:11:03+00:00): Salut !
Pour ce chemins et ceux alentour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983229983, il pourrait s'agir d'un chemin forestier, donc highway=track devrait faire le job. T'en pense quoi ?

Note : Je n'ai pas été sur le terrain
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
naomap (2021-11-22 11:31:32+00:00): Bonjour.

À Chaville-Vélizy ce chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983234249 est en access=no, ce qui ne permet pas de passer du trottoir https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/829620874 au passage piéton https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/193902775. Est-ce que cette traversée est vraiment interdite ?

Merci pour ton retour,
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
naomap (2021-11-22 11:35:51+00:00): Au fait, le trottoir en question est déjà indiqué par le tag sidewalk sur la rue voisine https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554750110, il n'est pas forcément utile ici.
Antoine.