piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gwahak (2022-07-01 03:33:50+00:00): https://law.go.kr/LSW/ordinInfoP.do?ordinSeq=1701269&chrClsCd=010202&gubun=ELIS&nwYn=Y&conDatGubunCd=undefined 법적으로 행정동계가 법정동과 다르게 바뀐 것은 없으며 법정동상으로 세종동의 하천변이 인접 생활권에 편입되기 전까지는 현 조례상으로는 세종동이 전부 새롬동 관할입니다.
gwahak (2022-07-01 03:36:52+00:00): 잘못 만들어진 새 바운더리들은 행정구역 개편등에 대비해 생활권 경계로 남겨놓더라도 법적인 바운더리가 아닌 것처럼 구분해야 할 것 같습니다.
gwahak (2022-07-01 03:46:21+00:00): 잘못 만든 line을 장래에 활용할 수 있으므로 삭제하지 않되, 행정동 경계는 일단 복구하겠습니다.
Jisho (2022-07-01 03:53:14+00:00): 개정 사유에 '금강 하천구역을 인접한 행정동에서 관할하여 효율적인 하천 및 천변 관리를 도모하고자 함'이라 되어 있습니다(입법예고, 공고 제2022-224호). 조례 별표 상 한솔20통 등 일부 통에 '인근 하천·천변'이 추가되어서, 불명확하긴 합니다만 세종동 강변 지역 일부는 인접한 행정동에 포함된다 봐도 될 텐데요.
Jisho (2022-07-01 04:35:59+00:00): 이런 이유로 현 조례와 링크의 세종시 공지사항의 이미지 사이에 안 맞는 점이 없다고 판단하여 이미지대로 경계를 반영하고자 한 것인데, 혹 여전히 세종시 공지사항의 이미지가 옳지 않다고 생각하신다면 원대로 하셔도 됩니다.
gwahak (2022-07-01 05:30:55+00:00): 제가 보기에는 그게 원문을 보고 해석한다면 금강 하천구역을 의미하는건지 아니면 해당 법정동 내의 공원 등을 해당 통에 포함시킨다는 건지 확실하지 않아 보이는데, 세종시의 입장을 확인해야 할 것 같습니다.
gwahak (2022-07-01 05:32:32+00:00): 하천구역이 어느 행정동에 속하는지에 대해 조례(법)랑 실질 행정지도가 불일치하는 경우가 있어서 on the ground rule에 따라 일단 세종시에서 밝힌 지도 기준으로 놔둘게요.
skquinn (2022-07-01 00:45:23+00:00): Oops. Looks like Every Door likes to submit the occasional empty changeset.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-01 05:19:39+00:00): I would consider uploading image to Wikimedia Commons and linking using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons

This will it make it more usable due to a clear copyright status
Thierry1030 (2022-07-01 07:52:19+00:00): I don't have a preference. 
I posted your remark in the chatgroup of OpenStreetMap Belgium -> https://matrix.to/#/#osmbe:matrix.org
you can also react/comment over there with the other users and members
pertile (2022-08-30 22:45:08+00:00): hola, estos cambios todavía no se implementaron y ya pasaron dos meses. Como regla general no modificar hasta tanto se habilite, menos en un lugar tan poblado donde seguro alguien lo marcará el día que se habilite
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:01:57+00:00): Hi,

the relation 14311516 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

Best regards
gurglypipe (2022-07-01 11:41:57+00:00): Hiya, what was the reasoning behind this change? As far as I know, that road is just a driveway for The Villa, and is not a public road.
gurglypipe (2022-07-01 15:04:12+00:00): Update for anyone else reading this later: the change was reverted as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123088018

Thanks
hanchao (2022-07-31 13:38:52+00:00): 不要在osm上添加不存在的测试数据
相关数据已删除
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124303690
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124303543
5m4u9 (2022-07-02 03:59:48+00:00): hola, como que no tiene mucho sentido ese hashtag en description, en el changeset ya tiene el hashtag -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123050683
JJIglesias (2022-07-04 23:34:30+00:00): si pero yo quite ese hashtag q lo habian puesto como Tag independiente, solo lo movi a descripcion para q no se perdiera
JJIglesias (2022-07-04 23:34:57+00:00): pues incluia un nombre
SistemaRayoXP (2022-07-01 03:10:51+00:00): La anterior no era A07, se me fue el texto
jqngarcia (2022-07-01 05:39:16+00:00): Buenos días Yoyo, son dos talleres de electrónica o alguno de los dos está mal ubicado?

Salud y Mapas, JQN
@Yoyo (2022-07-01 13:19:34+00:00): Saludos es solo un taller pero por error mío puse uno fuera de su ubicación el que marque fuera de la edificación. El que se encuentra en la edificación es el correcto. Muchas gracias y disculpe la molestia. El marcado como taller de reparaciones favor eliminarlo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:50:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
MxxCon (2022-07-01 04:47:28+00:00): Hello.
What is "crossing_ref=" tag for?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123066582
parabolaprince (2022-07-03 01:21:36+00:00): Apparently it's for the way the crossing is painted on the street. If it looks like a ladder, it's marked as ladder. It doesn't really matter imo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123066582
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:18:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SistemaRayoXP (2022-07-01 04:16:24+00:00): Es la T03-C01
Piskvor (2022-07-01 09:07:09+00:00): Super, díky za úpravu. Ta sedmdesátka je tam vyznačená v celém úseku?
redd (2025-07-10 10:45:18+00:00): Hi hanxna,
bei der Erfassung des Namens "Spiekplatz" gehe ich von einem Tippfehler aus und hab es gelöscht. 

Falls doch anders, bitte nochmal überprüfen.

vielen Dank,

redd
Carto_Graph (2022-07-02 13:16:44+00:00): Желательно выпрямлять углы (правой кнопкой->прямоугольник). И чтобы забор не пересекал здание. Исправил.
Carnildo (2022-07-01 23:13:48+00:00): "access=designated" doesn't make sense.  "designated" is meant to be applied to specific modes of travel, such as "hgv=designated" to indicate a truck route.
Coloradohusky (2022-07-02 00:46:02+00:00): On Go Map!!, it gives me multiple options to choose from for ‘All Travel’: Allowed, Prohibited, Permissive, Private, Designated, Destination, Dismount, and Permit - I selected Designated, as signs said it was for maintenance use only (see https://ibb.co/KF8mdwS and https://ibb.co/smQFgW4 for screenshots of the app)
Carnildo (2022-07-02 01:37:57+00:00): Sounds like the access should be "private", then: you can only use it with explicit permission.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 13:00:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128210005 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Leo Slager (2022-07-01 18:07:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2022-07-01 18:23:35+00:00): review:
Alleen de naam doet niks op de kaart.
Ik heb de volgende tag toegevoegd:
tourisme=hostel
Zie ook de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhostel
Kortendijk4 (2023-03-11 07:21:43+00:00): Hoi Leo
Wij zijn niet zo handig in computers zou u dat niet voor elkaar krijgen. Omdat toe te voegen bij ons mvg Ludwig en Petra 
The hive
Leo Slager (2023-03-11 10:53:56+00:00): stond al netjes op de kaart.
extra toegevoegd:
website=www.campercontact.com
phone= +31 612803583
e-mail=llfjansen@home.nl
dog=yes
Kortendijk4 (2023-03-11 15:30:48+00:00): Hoi Leo
Bedankt
Mvg Ludwig en Petra Jansen
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:00:57+00:00): Hi,

the relation 7099854 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

Best regards
Warin61 (2022-07-02 01:11:45+00:00): Hi,
level=-2;0 is not a valid entry. 

The level=* key indicates the floor level where a feature (such as an amenity or shop) is located in a building. A railway line ... here .. in a building. No. 

Tag deleted. 

The following train routes have been repaired after your changes;
India Pacific
Dubbo XPT
Broken Hill Xplorer
mapsamillion78 (2022-07-04 00:49:47+00:00): Hi, thanks for checking this out. 

In this particular instance, as the platform has a Level value less than 0, the railway line segment adjacent to the platform must match the Level value of the platform. 

Essentially, the platform level value and railway line level value should match. 

This is for routing purposes to ensure the train is on the right "level" for passenger navigation.

TfNSW is updating more and more stations in OSM, please continue to keep an eye out on edits and question any anomalies as it is much appreciated.
Warin61 (2022-07-04 08:23:34+00:00): The platform here is at 'ground level'. OSM convention is that 'ground level' is level=0. 
The platform is not a building - so it does not require a level value and should be left without that tag. A feature without the level tag is taken as level=0. only when the platform & railway line are not at ground level should the level and layer tags be used. 

I note you have a roof at layer=1 - above gorund ok .. but then level=-2 - below ground? 

And the signal box at layer=-2 .. below ground and level=-2 .. below ground again?

The platforms are tag as level=-2 by you ... and that is not correct. 

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level#Ground_floor_number

In particular the words "For typical street, waterway or railway crossings over bridges or tunnels, layer=* should be used instead. Roads or other ways passing through buildings should be marked with tunnel=building_passage; they should be only marked with level if there is a strong relation to the corresponding level of the building. "
mapsamillion78 (2022-07-04 10:40:49+00:00): Hi Warin61, thanks so much again for looking at this.. much appreciated.

Technically yes, any feature on "ground level" implicitly is level=0 and doesn't need the Level tag per se. 

However, for routing purposes and particularly Indoor routing software, it is useful and important to have the Level=* tag on connected features on the same "level" - inclusive of the railway line (just for the length of the platform, not entire length of line); platform; connecting pathways on the platform itself and; connecting stairs/ramps/evevators.

There are precedents throughout the world with this convention and we are moving towards this convention throughout NSW.

In regards to the Layer tag - yeh this can get get overlooked/messed up in long editing sessions that's for sure!!! As far as I understand it, Layer=* determines the graphic or "drawing" order, whereas Level=* is used strictly for topological congruence. 

Happy for Layer=* to be fixed if you see something doesn't look right.
Warin61 (2022-07-04 11:17:18+00:00): The level value is 0 for 'ground level' and that would be the platforms and train line in this region. Connecting things would therefore be on level=0 ... That is the convention. More over the convention is that level=o does not need to be tagged explicitly as it is the default value. 

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:level

-----------------------------
For the layer tag read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer

Note drawing order is set by the render ... not the OSM tags. While most renders pay attention to the layer tag it is not what mappers should tag for., mappers should tag the layer for the vertical relationships between crossing or overlapping features.
somix (2022-07-01 18:37:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. В название улицы пишите слово "улица".
Frans S (2022-07-09 10:45:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions).

D: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.

E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123071075
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:47:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
PlayGuide (2023-01-30 21:18:46+00:00): Bonjour, il y a une erreur dans le tracé du parc Simone Veil, il s'étend trop loin vers le sud-est. La maison blanche au toit en zinc (numéro 123 de la rue, parcelle 171 du cadastre) n'a pas été démolie ! Il faudrait la rétablir en allant fouiller l'historique (je ne sais pas faire...). Par ailleurs, il y a un petit parking public à l'entrée du parc (le long de cette fameuse maison), ça serait bien de l'enegistrer dans OSM.
Polarbear (2022-10-29 21:44:29+00:00): Der Weg war bereits mit access=no komplett gesperrt. Du hast ihn nun zu einem Zaun "umgebaut" - das ist nicht plausibel. 
 
Repariert.
Leo Slager (2022-07-02 09:31:24+00:00): Helaas gaat dat met de editor iD altijd fout.
De editor iD kan niet met routerelaties omgaan en plaatst een nieuwe halte of wegen altijd achteraan in de relatie.
Dat levert dan een foutmelding op omdat de wegen en haltes niet in de juiste volgorde staan.
Als je serieus met routerelaties wilt werken dan adviseer ik je om over te stappen naar de editor JOSM.
Daarmee kun je de haltes en wegen wel in de juiste volgorde opnemen in de routerelatie.
.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
Leo Slager (2022-07-02 09:31:50+00:00): De routerelaties zijn weer gerepareerd.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:08:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:49:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
cyton (2022-07-01 14:08:39+00:00): ist unter der neuen brücke doch noch gesperrt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123072284
StefanHRT (2022-07-01 14:36:19+00:00): Keine Ahnung, kann sein das da wieder offen ist, ist auf meinen Bildern nicht genau zu erkennen.
Syl (2022-07-07 08:39:47+00:00): Bonjour, je viens de supprimer les descriptions publicitaires qui vous aviez ajouté sur 4 de ces campings.
Cordialement.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:18:12+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184129728

https://osm.org/changeset/184129728
ika-chan! (2022-07-01 07:42:54+00:00): Can you wait a bit while I try and recover the relations? I tried to do it and I keep getting an edit conflict.
Thanosmed (2022-07-01 07:49:36+00:00): Hello. Sorry again for the mess. After a lot of effort I think I found out what kind of mistake I had done and tried to restore it. In fact I added all relations I believe that are related to this line. I tried to do that as my intention is to learn and fix any trouble I had caused. You may check it out of course, thank you.
ika-chan! (2022-07-01 08:11:54+00:00): Okay, I fixed the relations. Here is how routes work: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport#Service_routes - one object (stop_position) per stop to the route relations.
Thanosmed (2022-07-01 08:19:43+00:00): Thank you ika-chan and sorry again for the inconvenience. It won't be repeated.
woodpeck_repair (2023-12-14 09:33:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145103843 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits einer Sockenpuppe des gesperrten beautifulplaces, s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15368
AmanBD (2022-07-13 07:58:06+00:00): This is a Zilla Road, not trunk road. For more details, see https://www.rhd.gov.bd/RHDMaps_new/Maps/Roads/7.jpg
StC (2022-07-02 09:02:32+00:00): Bonjour,

votre modification a détruit le nœud 268041685, qui était une partie constitutive du réseau pédestre de Grand Lac. Pouvez-vous regarder svp ?
user_10714872 (2022-07-03 13:11:04+00:00): 你好，原648县道（水口—竹山路）已升级为281省道的一部分，现已修正
Andrea Musuruane (2022-07-02 08:19:47+00:00): Ciao. Inserire tag per placare degli errori senza capirne il perché è un problema. Ad esempio, hai inserito il tag layer=-1 alla way 438417970. E' errato perché il sentiero non passa sotto la strada ma la attraversa. Quindi bisogna togliere questo tag e inserire i vari nodi in corrispondenza degli incroci. Altro esempio. Alla way 474229530 è stato anche qui aggiunto il tag layer=-1 perché incrociava un edificio. Anche in questo caso è errato. Se la way attraversa un edificio, bisogna usare il tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage solo (ovviamente solo nel tratto in cui la strada passa sotto all'edificio, non su tutta la way). Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123074224
mavl (2022-07-03 06:12:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок меняет статус населённого пункта Головина с village на hamlet.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1375905032/history  
  
Деревне возвращён прежний статус, так как он больше подходит для этого населённого пункта.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:place
BJMTR (2022-07-02 13:21:00+00:00): 可以以https://space.bilibili.com/44218/channel/seriesdetail?sid=897812
为参考
SNH48-林忆宁 (2022-07-02 13:31:48+00:00): 这不雅音的pov吗（但是只能知道一侧的大致的情况
SNH48-林忆宁 (2022-07-02 13:40:29+00:00): @BJMTR

另外L6钱-丰，L3新-汽，L4皋-新，L1云-下和大会展中心西边那段，L7坎-新，HF公-桂的走向似乎有点不太对，有兴趣的话可以对着这些视频改一下[滑稽]
BJMTR (2022-07-02 14:09:37+00:00): 好的，大会展中心过江段不是单洞双线吗？
SNH48-林忆宁 (2022-07-02 14:15:44+00:00): 单洞双线没错，但是线位不对。往下沙江滨方向出站后马上是个往右的弯道，然后一直走直线过的江（
BJMTR (2022-07-02 15:51:52+00:00): 部分已改，L7在我对其系统性编辑时统一修改
BJMTR (2022-07-02 16:00:49+00:00): 在编辑曲线（即弯道）时要体现出缓和曲线（即由直线到圆曲线半径逐渐减小的一种曲线过渡段）
SNH48-林忆宁 (2022-07-02 16:30:26+00:00): あのね缓和曲线这种基础的专有名词我也知道，但是这些数据从哪里来？没有设计图纸的话不是只能瞎猜吗？

而且osm里的曲线全都是用直线拟合的，硬凹这种东西也没什么意义（
ChehrehBargi (2024-04-24 06:52:24+00:00): Hello
You have registered this business or shop with the wrong tag. You have two weeks to correct it.
ChehrehBargi (2024-05-09 06:35:19+00:00): Following the reminder two weeks ago and your non-response in correcting the tags of this place, the problem will be removed.
jeslop (2022-07-01 08:56:21+00:00): Hola Noelia_879, bienvenida a OSM. Dos cosas sobre tu edición:
- L'Acàcia, ¿es una sirena de emergencia que suena en ese horario de lunes a viernes y fines de semana? Revisa la etiqueta que has usado porque creo que te has confundido.
- Has eliminado la etiqueta "hamlet" para Siurana, esto no debe hacerse casi en ninguna circunstancia. Lo he corregido.

Te recomiendo leer la Guía de principiantes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes / https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ca:Beginners%27_guide

También que contactes con la comunidad local: 
lista correo talk-es: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-es/
el foro: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=83 
los grupos de Telegram: https://t.me/OSMes
https://t.me/osmcat

Saludos.

Jesús López | OpenStreetMap Foundation | Data Working Group
aceman444 (2022-07-22 05:53:08+00:00): Dakujem za upratanie vlakovej linky. Ma vlak aj opacny smer? Lebo teraz mame len zo Zvolena do Kosic. Tiez ked uz je to public_transport:version=2 tak by clenmi mali byt zastavky (public_transport=platform) a miesta zastavenia vozidla (public_transport=stop_position), nie body reprezentujuce celu stanicu. Chapem, ze to asi tak doteraz bolo, ale teraz to nesplna kriteria public_transport:version=2. Hlasi to JOSM a mozno bude aj OSM Inspector. Dakujem
Filip009 (2022-07-22 06:38:18+00:00): Áno jasné, že má chcel by som to upratať, na celom Slovensku. Chcel som si k tomu spraviť wiki stránku, len som sa pustil radšej do jednoduchšej veci, ktorou bol ten reimport ŠOPSR. Chýba nám tu väčšina vlakov. Čakal som, kým sa to objaví na https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=9/48.4502/19.2892&layers=O, že či to bude vyzerať okej, či som nič nepokazil.
Chrbticová sieť by mala vyzerať RR Gemeran (Zvolen - Košice), R Urpín (Bratislava - Banská Bystrica), R Tatran (Bratislava - Žilina - Košice), R Fatran (Vrútky - Banská Bystrica). Budem rád, keby sme sa nejak spojili a poradil by ste mi, čo a ako by to bolo spraviť najjednoduchšie.
Filip009 (2022-07-22 22:31:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Slovakia_railways

Spravil som nejakú základnú wiki stránku. Vedeli by sme sa skontaktovať, aby sme spolu prišli na nejaké riešenie?
aceman444 (2022-10-09 17:53:36+00:00): Ano mozme sa spojit, v mapovani MHD som aktivny. Poslete mi sukromnu spravu cez OSM alebo chcete emailom?
aceman444 (2022-10-09 17:55:23+00:00): Vyznacit aspon hlavne IC/EC/R linky v SR by bolo fajn, hned by sa lepsie routovalo :)
jeslop (2022-07-01 09:02:58+00:00): Hola Aina-, bienvenido a OSM. Dos cosas sobre tu edición: 
- Las pistas de tenis no tienen como nombre "Pista de tenis", si se llamase Pista Paula Badosa si estaría en la etiqueta nombre, pero en tu caso solo describe lo que es que ya va en otras etiquetas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones

- Procura ser más claro en los comentarios en los conjuntos de cambios, ayudarás a que otros usuarios sepan lo que has hecho y ayudarte en caso de necesidad: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Te recomiendo leer la Guía de principiantes: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes / https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ca:Beginners%27_guide

También que contactes con la comunidad local a través de cualquiera de estos grupos: 
lista correo talk-es: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-es/ 
el foro: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=83 
los grupos de Telegram: https://t.me/OSMes 
https://t.me/osmcat

Saludos.
Jesús López | OpenStreetMap Foundation | Data Working Group
SekeRob (2022-07-01 17:24:50+00:00): Ciao

Una piccola battuta, ma secondo i link di wikipedia https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camillo_de_Lellis e tutte le altre strade di OSM con il nome 'de lellis' si scrivono come 'San Camillo de Lellis'

L'onore è tuo di apportare la correzione su tutte e 20 circa parti del nome di questa via a Chieti

buona serata.
alix_geovelo (2022-07-05 09:03:57+00:00): Bonjour
Etes-vous certains que la voie "remplace" la route principale sur cette partie ? OU c'est un chemin en parallèle de la route principale  ?
NicalBrgs (2022-07-05 09:48:28+00:00): Bonjour, 
Effectivement c’est un chemin en parallèle. 
Je débute sur OSM désolé de cette fausse manip.
alix_geovelo (2022-07-05 13:46:44+00:00): Aucun problème ! 
Si vous avez des photos ou autre à communiquer à support@geovelo.fr, cela nous permettra de mettre à jour.
SInon, quelques petites lectures intéressantes pour la contribution sur le sujet vélo sur OSM 

Le wiki d'OSM Bicycle : tous les détails sur les sujets  vélo
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

Un concentré des tags et divers : 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/6/62/OSMecum_CartoVeloIDF_moyen_A4.pdf

Et en général, le wiki est votre bible :)
mueschel (2022-07-09 10:11:25+00:00): hi,
you added a 'BETECKNING' tag to several road - could you check that?
blajo (2022-07-09 11:09:23+00:00): Thanks for alerting, removed the tags.