piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
4004 (2019-05-12 18:18:29+00:00): feel like "sport club" is not part of the name here?
JovianMapper (2019-05-13 21:27:25+00:00): Hello 4004,

We appreciate your input regarding the name of this POI. This feedback has helped us gain an understanding of how businesses are named in Belarus. Thank for your support and guidance.

Happy Mapping,

JovianMapper
4004 (2019-05-18 20:36:55+00:00): Hi JovianMapper/apple map team;
I am by no means an expert, just following osm guidance on using the name tag - eg no "shop" in a name of the shop, unless it is an actual part of the name (eg The Sweet Shop").
hope this helps
JovianMapper (2019-05-21 19:04:59+00:00): That makes sense, thanks!
mavl (2019-05-09 21:13:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 68059293, 68104729, 68105508, 68105633, 68105709, 68105756, 68105794, 68145959, 68146345, 68146553, 68146697, 68146985, 68160864, 68160965, 68161529, 68161721, 68162153, 68162234, 68162279, 68162376, 68162611, 68163568, 68163694, 68163739, 68163838, 68164041, 68164085, 68165740, 68165906, 68165940, 68185910, 68186173, 68186549, 68186818, 68187032, 68187125, 68187226, 68187443, 68187485, 68187666, 68188069, 68188313, 68188419, 68201429, 68201505, 68201819, 68202901, 68203003, 68203435, 68204155, 68209021, 68209301, 68219195, 68219574, 68219739, 68220172, 68220806, 68221103, 68222194, 68222809, 68223067, 68223182, 68223878, 68224030, 68224108, 68224674, 68224917, 68224941, 68225338, 68225802, 68226067, 68226507, 68227031, 68227887, 68229085, 68229569, 68229829, 68230512, 68236789, 68238522, 68239997, 68240230, 68247095, 68247157, 68254338, 68255431, 68256612, 68260729, 68261425, 68262633, 68264209, 68265323, 68266171, 68268335, 68270151, 68270836, 68271582, 68272302, 68274451, 68274945, 68275128, 68275866, 68276159, 68282116, 68283110, 68283717, 68284914, 68286819, 68289047, 68291105, 68294222, 68296422, 68297967, 68298794, 68299585, 68299677, 68301187, 68301547, 68302548, 68304679, 68320691, 68321801, 68324701, 68331931, 68334880, 68335937, 68339550, 68341880, 68347033, 68349262, 68352538, 68355370, 68355422, 68356009, 68356116, 68356294, 68356946, 68364052, 68366235, 68369850, 68371410, 68376470, 68378521, 68378950, 68379651, 68382412, 68383510, 68385700, 68398957, 68399291, 68399782, 68410999, 68415910, 68420221, 68423584, 68424323, 68424816, 68426829, 68429253, 68430393, 68431131, 68435575, 68436037, 68438609, 68440451, 68441506, 68445511, 68449963, 68451718, 68453195, 68453821, 68454265, 68454853, 68456313, 68457805, 68461972, 68461999, 68470135, 68472619, 68473840, 68474670, 68478553, 68479612, 68480583, 68480769, 68481059, 68482276, 68504512, 68508186, 68509217, 68509411, 68511594, 68512732, 68513256, 68522231, 68522792, 68543895, 68590317, 68622884, 68624896, 68625555, 68626317, 68632967, 68637600, 68667338, 68667792, 68671144, 68672198, 68676292, 68677578, 68699310, 68701260, 68701674, 68701804, 68715154, 68715560, 68716454, 68717330, 68726805, 68727988, 68757049, 68760622, 68761787, 68762697, 68790311, 68792530, 68794430, 68795279, 68831135, 68865085, 68865275, 68865601, 68869172, 68870281, 68870622, 68872458, 68872673, 68893573, 68894195, 68895155, 68958266, 68959415, 68966165, 68966428, 68966840, 68967075, 68967170, 68991977, 68995311, 69011097, 69046189, 69140482, 69150153, 69150744, 69170723, 69171419, 69177526, 69178135, 69182449, 69201587, 69203539, 69204391, 69205822, 69242042, 69242271, 69295064, 69296765, 69345956, 69349941, 69358348, 69369923, 69370472, 69372794, 69375281, 69379002, 69382150, 69385738, 69387010, 69395301, 69395710, 69402647, 69406490, 69409242, 69410903, 69416107, 69416729, 69422282, 69422845, 69424353, 69425609, 69427087, 69427817, 69438933, 69442833, 69445192, 69450587, 69452938, 69458491, 69460807, 69464815, 69476830, 69480051, 69501933, 69502957, 69503313, 69759396, 69759457, 69762413, 69841058, 69879265.
user_6110846 (2019-05-09 12:27:30+00:00): Ви порушуєте правила 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.900254544813166/28.854579439425855 
дорога що сполучає село та залізничну зупинку а також як резервна сполучає з селом майданівка 
t
Ти взагалі домовленість української спіольноти коли відкривав

хотя б попитав би в dudka olehz andygol
user_6110846 (2019-05-09 12:45:29+00:00): and violate the rules
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.900254544813166/28.854579439425855
the road connecting the village and the railway station and also as an alternative connects with the village of Maidanivka
t
You when the resolution of the Ukrainian community read about the status of roads
Apparently, the last 2 years did not read at all

though would have asked in cartographers dudka olehz andygol
KakarotCake (2019-05-08 22:43:52+00:00): meant greenvale oops lmao
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70051822 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fake peak imports in UK and Ireland.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2748 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-05-08 23:01:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 70049062, 70049548, 70049582, 70049608, 70049640, 70049678, 70049702, 70049734, 70049767, 70049792, 70049815, 70049845, 70049879, 70049911, 70049956, 70050005, 70050026, 70050074, 70050107, 70050134, 70050161, 70050196, 70050220, 70050262, 70050311, 70050340, 70050376, 70050414, 70050456, 70050492, 70050521, 70050561, 70050580, 70050624, 70050645, 70050689, 70050714, 70050737, 70050774, 70050819, 70050853, 70050891, 70050930, 70050974, 70051019, 70051077, 70051095, 70051143, 70051171, 70051207, 70051240, 70051261, 70051293, 70051327, 70051393, 70051413, 70051430, 70051455, 70051477, 70051491, 70051504, 70051533, 70051565, 70051588, 70051624, 70051646, 70051677, 70051699, 70051708, 70051730.
vorpalblade (2019-05-14 02:17:47+00:00): Since you've asked for a review, here we go:
1) Harley Davidson could be tagged as a motorcycle dealership (pretty much the same thing you did for Bookcliff Gardens).
2) When outlining buildings/drawing in new roads, I _highly_ recommend using the county's aerial imagery (you can use that by clicking on the layers icon or pressing "b" on the keyboard and then selecting "Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2018" -- you'll only need the other imagery if you are mapping Mesa County outside of Grand Junction/Fruit/Palisade).
3) It looks like you realigned some roads based off of the Bing Aerial imagery -- again, I'd use the county's imagery, since it is more accurate, higher resolution, and newer.

I've left everything alone, so you can play around with it and see the difference.

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and if you have any questions, send me a message!
Anisa IRM-ED (2021-06-24 01:52:15+00:00): Ola, @Ederson Panini Marques
o corpo d'água (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/688761881) cruzou a rodovia. Por favor, dê uma olhada! Você se importaria de consertá-lo? Obrigado e feliz mapeamento!
translated by Google
eggie (2019-05-09 06:31:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Je vraagt om een review.. Niet dubbel taggen svp. Of je kiest voor de adresnode of voor het gebouw. Niet beide. 
Een gebouw krijgt ook niet nog eens een adres. 
Het netste is hier om alleen op het gebouw de place_of_worship info te laten staan Het rendert dan als religieus gebouw.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-09 06:48:27+00:00): Duplikaat tagging verwijderd....
catholic omgezet naar roman_catholic
Info staat nu alleen  op de kapel zelf.
building=chapel ipv yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=place%20of%20worship?uselang=nl
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-05-09 06:34:12+00:00): Landuse op landuse kan eigenlijk niet. je zult zoiets moeten "inbedden" in de omliggende landuse als inner in een outer multipolygoon. Iets voor als je meer ervaring hebt.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-05-09 06:42:02+00:00): aangepast met mp
Warin61 (2019-05-13 05:01:05+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

The change of way 674596553 from highway=construction to highway=footway left behind construction=footway. That is confusing .. is it still under construction as the tag construction=footway or has it been constructed and now finished as highway=footway suggests?
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-09 07:17:51+00:00): Hi devinpfoff, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting all service ways, which you mapped before? Thanks.
devinp (2019-05-09 09:22:36+00:00): I'm still new to this and I mapped several driveways on a street. Wasn't sure I did it right. I dont see many driveways mapped anywhere else.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-09 09:25:20+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
Looks fine to me.
freebeer (2019-05-10 04:15:29+00:00): driveways are fine to map, and if you look far away enough, you will see places where every private driveway shows on the map.

if you agree, i can revert this in order that your original driveways re-appear.  the osm rule is that if something exists, it can show on the map, and over time, this level of detail will be the norm.
devinp (2019-05-10 09:14:57+00:00): You're welcome to revert my driveway additions if you think that is ok. Also, Is it standard practice to attach the driveway straight to the house polygon? I'm trying to find many best practices when mapping.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-10 10:06:10+00:00): See #OpenStreetMap #Help --> https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/35795/map-buildings-connecting-the-road-or-not
Glassman (2019-05-09 02:24:13+00:00): Your recent edits all look good. If you have any questions, please let me know.

Question for you. Is this area in tribal lands? If so we need to add the boundaries.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70053758
TravGW (2019-05-09 03:35:05+00:00): It has become quite obvious that most of your edits are an attempt to manipulate Pokémon Go data. This is considered an act of vandalism and has been reverted. Continue to manipulate the map and you will be reported, possibly banned. If you want to contiune to edit the map you must follow the guidelines set forth in the wiki. All other edits found to be acceptable were adjusted to fit OSM standards as needed. Again please review the wiki before continuing to make edits. The online editor has links to the wiki for each feature. Clicking on the `i` found to the right of each tag or feature will show a link to the wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-09 15:15:35+00:00): What was wrong with these updates.   town homes have different addresses and should be split separately.   The grounds around the homes have grass and sidewalks and parking areas?
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-09 17:42:50+00:00): You may want to read it yourself.   

"Good changeset comments
Main article: Good changeset comments
A good changeset comment should concisely and adequately describe an edit. You should do this out of courtesy to your fellow mappers, to avoid misunderstandings, and get mistakes fixed quickly. It makes your edits more valuable. It may even help you when you look back at your edits in future."
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-09 17:44:29+00:00): reverting is doing nothing but delaying changes.    The map is incomplete and should be finished.    I am slowly working on my area.   I have ADHD, I jump around because that is how my brain works.
viloan (2019-05-09 00:25:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-09 12:06:06+00:00): Please, use more meaningful description than "Updated area." - every edit updates some area.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-09 15:17:18+00:00): What was wrong with the updates?     townhomes should be broken down.  The sidewalks, grass, and parking should be identified?
mbethke (2019-05-14 09:36:05+00:00): Hi, thanks for your additions! Please remember though to name-tag things only with their *name*. If you don't know it or can't spell the Lao, that's not a problem, you can leave it blank and someone else will probably fill it in.

cheers,
Matthias
skquinn (2019-05-09 02:20:34+00:00): Somehow, JOSM managed to upload this after freezing and refusing to display an upload dialog box. Changeset comment should have been: Add buildings. Source should have been: Mapbox Satellite; Texas Orthophoto
skquinn (2020-01-23 00:00:57+00:00): See comments on changesets 70056500 and 79941854.
skquinn (2020-01-23 00:00:42+00:00): Somehow, between this changeset and 70056063, I managed to wind up making duplicate buildings, fixed in changeset 79941854.
bielebog (2019-05-09 21:29:58+00:00): Entweder ist das ein Wegweiser, so wie Du es mit dem name-tag andeutest.

Dann wäre das korrekte Tagging

information=guidepost ¹
Ohne name=*

Oder es handelt sich, so wie es mit historic=wayside_cross ² eingetragen ist, tatsächlich um ein Wegekreuz.

Dann ist einfach nur das name="Wegweiser" falsch.

Generell ist name=* ³ nur für Eigennamen von Objekten gedacht. Für die Beschreibung, um _was_ es sich handelt existiert spezielles Tagging.

Eine Übersicht: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a




¹ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguidepost

² https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic=wayside%20cross?uselang=de

³ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
Bonix-Mapper (2019-08-26 17:33:45+00:00): Olá We3er-xD,

Você fez um reajuste em dois polígonos e eles estão gerando um warning do tipo "building inside building". Os dois polígonos estão se sobrepondo:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/618145122/history

Se os prédios estão unidos, os dois pontos de uma face do prédio devem estar conectados ao outro.

Se estão um ao lado do outro, devem estar separados totalmente.

Você consegue corrigir ou precisa de ajuda?
We3er-xD (2019-08-26 18:16:30+00:00): Não estou encontrando o erro..
Se você encontrar poderia fazer essa reajuste pra mim por favor...
Obrigado!
Bonix-Mapper (2019-08-27 21:10:06+00:00): 
A área dos banheiros públicos, mapeada como building, estava sobrepondo-se ao edifício.

Corrigi:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688813185/history
Warin61 (2019-06-27 05:34:05+00:00): Hi,
way 688813424 self intersects. Fixed... but then

Way: 688813418 overlays Way: 688813420 .. and so on.

Don't do that. Not fixing those.
voschix (2019-11-15 17:13:29+00:00): Hi, the two new roads are on a military area,  (gates). Knowing the area I will correct the access tagging. Please be careful when mapping from satellite photos.
dirtyidol (2019-05-15 08:23:11+00:00): "(местное название поля и по совместительству озера)" из name= нужно переместить в отдельный тег description= 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:description
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70059062
mavl (2019-05-10 02:35:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70094185 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
clairedelune (2019-10-29 11:35:26+00:00): Hi @ElYunque, is it possible to share the reason for downgrading all those roads as paths please? Roads with the function of connecting settlements should rarely be tagged this way. On satellite imagery, roads may appear very narrow simply because 4-wheels vehicles are rare in the region, it doesn't mean that the road isn't widely used or important. Please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
ElYunque (2019-10-31 01:57:29+00:00): I changed these to path because they connect isolated settlements. The Highway Tag Africa page says paths “may be the primary access route for isolated settlements.” Originally they were secondary. I see what you are saying and will use unclassified when roads connect settlements like these ones.
DP24PH (2019-05-19 06:08:46+00:00): Kindly confirm if Caltex is closed actually.
bielebog (2019-05-09 21:30:40+00:00): Entweder ist das ein Wegweiser, so wie Du es mit dem name-tag andeutest.

Dann wäre das korrekte Tagging

information=guidepost ¹
Ohne name=*

Oder es handelt sich, so wie es mit historic=wayside_cross ² eingetragen ist, tatsächlich um ein Wegekreuz.

Dann ist einfach nur das name="Wegweiser" falsch.

Generell ist name=* ³ nur für Eigennamen von Objekten gedacht. Für die Beschreibung, um _was_ es sich handelt existiert spezielles Tagging.

Eine Übersicht: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a




¹ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguidepost

² https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic=wayside%20cross?uselang=de

³ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
bielebog (2019-05-09 21:30:21+00:00): Entweder ist das ein Wegweiser, so wie Du es mit dem name-tag andeutest.

Dann wäre das korrekte Tagging

information=guidepost ¹
Ohne name=*

Oder es handelt sich, so wie es mit historic=wayside_cross ² eingetragen ist, tatsächlich um ein Wegekreuz.

Dann ist einfach nur das name="Wegweiser" falsch.

Generell ist name=* ³ nur für Eigennamen von Objekten gedacht. Für die Beschreibung, um _was_ es sich handelt existiert spezielles Tagging.

Eine Übersicht: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a




¹ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:information%3Dguidepost

² https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:historic=wayside%20cross?uselang=de

³ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
Protoxenus (2021-01-08 15:48:27+00:00): Du hast hier eine unvollständige und für mein Verständnis sinnlose Relation eingebaut oder geändert. Würdest du diese noch mal überprüfen? Danke.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-09 07:15:19+00:00): Hi SAJANSS, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind modifying this node 7 times without any change? Furthermore, which editor did you use? Thanks.
aharvey (2019-05-10 06:53:57+00:00): highway=secondary is for major roads, this is just a minor service road so I've downgraded the classification.
eggie (2019-05-09 06:53:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-05-09 06:59:37+00:00): Dag bernicek..

name =bare_soil hoort niet op de kaart.
area=yes doet ook niets op de kaart.
Stukjes "gemeente groen" zijn altijd lastig.
Je zult er op de kaart niets van zien behalve wellciht de naa bare soil en dat hoort hier niet thuis.
MVG,
Eggie

name=bare_soil is not according taggingrules in OSM.
area yes has no effect.
eggie (2019-05-09 07:09:30+00:00): area=yes  and name=bare soil removed. .. landuse=grass added with some trees.
The landuse is now an inner in an outer multipolygon otherwise is has no effect what's however.
Have patience for rendering .
Gr eggie
trigpoint (2019-05-15 11:56:50+00:00): Hi Peter
The consensus among mappers is that references that are not verifiable on the ground should be put into other tags.
In the case of rights of way we use the prow_ref tag, please could you use this instead.
More specialised renderers do display them, see https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html
If you want to see an example see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/355132221
Cheers Phil
Peter Leese (2019-05-16 05:06:41+00:00): OK thanks, I will make the change
trigpoint (2019-05-16 11:21:49+00:00): Thank you Peter