piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Minh Nguyen (2017-08-09 00:00:03+00:00): Hi Edward, thanks for your contributions to OSM! Always happy to see more Cincinnatians around here. :-)

I noticed that you added a driveway but connected it to a power line. Since the two features aren’t connected in reality, please avoid connecting them to OSM. If you make an accidental connection, you can disconnect the two features by right-clicking on the intersecting node in iD, then choosing Disconnect or Delete.

Please let me know (either here or in a private message) if you have any questions about contributing to OSM. Thanks again!
Minh Nguyen (2017-08-31 05:24:22+00:00): Fixed in changeset 51598525.
5m4u9 (2017-08-09 06:01:56+00:00): hola, unicamente recomendar que es preferible siempre obviar abreviaciones en Av. C. Psje. etc... como humanos sabemos eso, pero los equipos son todavía tontos y no comprenden estas abreviaciones...
GinaroZ (2017-08-08 23:25:30+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4382552503 not better tagged as shop=e-cigarette?
sairfeet (2017-08-09 17:15:10+00:00): Good point. Just updated the name.  Didn't check the other tags. Thanks.
GinaroZ (2017-08-09 19:22:36+00:00): Saw something that needed editing so just fixed it myself.
mweper (2017-08-09 00:50:13+00:00): Hola Ngel. ¿Que vendría a ser esto? Por favor, provee más información (website, facebook, dirección, servicios que ofrece, etc.) para poder mapearlo correctamente.
Cualquier duda que tengas, me puedes contactar y te invito al grupo de OSM Argentina en Telegram ( https://t.me/osm_ar ).
look4book (2017-08-14 05:03:46+00:00): Hallo malottki - Du hast scheinbar einen zusätzlichen way auf vorhandenen Knoten um das Erbsland gelegt und ihn als relation type=inner und leisure=garden bezeichnet. Ich gebe zu bedenken, daß es bereits eine Relation namens "Arboretum Erbsland" gibt, und daß das Erbsland 1887 nicht als "leisure" angelegt wurde. Vielleicht finden wir noch ein einheitliches tagging, das auch der jüngsten touristischen Bedeutung gerecht wird. Etwa tourism=attraction?
Baron d'Arignac (2017-08-15 19:41:52+00:00): Hallo look4book,
ich fand es etwas merkwürdig, dass die Fläche für das Arboretum bislang ausgespart blieb (also kein Wald und auch sonst nichts). Gleichzeitig fand ich, dass die Entstehungsgeschichte des "forstbotanischen Gartens" schon darauf hindeutet, dass es ein bisschen mehr ist als ein normaler Waldlehrpfad. Insofern wollte ich mich an botanische Gärten angelehnen und eine Flächensignatur einfügen. Bzgl. der genauen Spezifizierung bin  ich aber leidenschaftslos, da kannst Du gerne ändern. Eine kurze Stichprobe unter mir bekannten Botanischen Gärten hat gezeigt, dass die recht uneinheitlich getaggt sind mit einer Tendenz zu leisure=park.
SomeoneElse (2017-08-09 14:03:48+00:00): Hi,
Presumably https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3835590182/history is no longer a carpet shop?
Best Regards,
Andy
VARVAR8 (2017-08-09 20:58:43+00:00): помилково видалені об'єкти (80 шт.) знаходяться тут - changeset 50957454
eggie (2017-08-09 06:10:10+00:00): Please -- tag a shop at the present address-node.
eggie (2017-08-09 06:12:24+00:00): merged info
BekahElise (2017-08-08 22:31:45+00:00): Updated area
fkv (2020-12-03 07:51:14+00:00): Die Forststraße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90387132 heißt nicht "Staudachgegend".
Road–Runner (2021-01-01 00:18:05+00:00): Bitte einfach ausbessern, ich hab das nur der basemap entnommen
fkv (2021-01-03 20:46:20+00:00): Bitte übernimm künftig keine Daten mehr ungeprüft aus der Basemap. Ein guter Teil der Straßennamen und Flurnamen in der Basemap sind falsch, und es ist mühsam, dass wir in OSM mit dem Löschen nicht mehr nachkommen, weil alle paar Tage sie jemand aus der Basemap abschreibt.
Die meisten falschen Straßennamen sind eh schon auf den ersten Blick falsch (wie kann eine Straße "...gegend" heißen?), aber eigentlich brauchst du überhaupt keine Straßennamen aus der Basemap abschreiben, weil die richtigen Straßennamen sowieso schon zu über 99% vollständig in OSM erfasst sind. Wenn Namen noch fehlen, dann hauptsächlich solche, die man nur vor Ort angeschrieben findet.
GerdP (2017-08-25 08:59:09+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed that you sometime use
highway=driveway instead of highway=service + service=driveway
Is this intended?
stevea (2017-08-25 18:31:50+00:00): Whoops, no.  Thank you for catching this!  Of course, I'm perfectly OK with any correction that you might make to this.  As well, I'll look out for any other, similar mistakes I have made and correct them.
Ace Agustin (2017-08-08 22:44:45+00:00): #hotosm-project-3383 #MissingMaps #EliminateMalaria #Laos
eggie (2017-08-09 06:00:04+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
Salamander1 (2017-08-08 23:24:59+00:00): Sorry, false description. Updated lane count and a few bends instead.
oormilavinod (2017-08-09 05:04:24+00:00): hey Renatojr17, welcome to OSM, really appreciate you interest in contributing here. but i also noticed that you have changed the tags of buildings and tagged them as a park. this is causing the map to render buildings as parks on our map. I am reverting this changeset. please add ground reality to the make and help us improve the map. have a great day
Tomio (2017-08-28 14:49:52+00:00): Corrected
sravan7 (2019-02-28 06:51:35+00:00): "Hi restudyah,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the node 5392406152 along with 
way 514050446 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery, partial road seems to be track road.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
oormilavinod (2017-08-09 04:57:06+00:00): hey Renatojr17, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
Tomio (2017-08-28 13:46:36+00:00): Corrected.
naoliv (2017-08-09 05:31:19+00:00): MiLorde, esses nomes de rua você obteve de onde?
MiLorde (2017-08-09 13:01:43+00:00): Bom dia, Naoliv, eu sobrepus as imagens de satélite do Google Maps e adicionei os nomes das ruas como lá estão inseridos.
naoliv (2017-08-09 13:12:55+00:00): Bom dia.
Infelizmente não podemos copiar nomes do Google (ou de outros mapas comerciais que não possuímos autorização, como do Bing, Here ou mesmo mapas em papel).
Podemos copiar os nomes de ruas do IBGE ou de outras fontes que possuímos permissão.
Para ver a camada do IBGE no editor que você utiliza, pressione a tecla B e depois selecione a camada "IBGE Mapa de Setores Urbanos".
Aqui em Araraquara podemos utilizar também o mapa da prefeitura, localizado em http://www3.araraquara.sp.gov.br/Pagina/Default.aspx?IDPagina=3972
Abraço
oormilavinod (2017-08-09 04:56:23+00:00): hey Professor John Finklestein, welcome to OSM.  I appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
Alecs01 (2017-08-09 14:15:07+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, please don't add personal notes/events to the map, thanks.
Linhares (2017-08-09 15:41:22+00:00): Daniel, obrigado pelas suas contribuições ao OSM!
Este ponto, no entanto, não parece correto... Se for um local particular, você tem a opção de criar favorito ao invés de salvar. Abraços, Linhares
aharvey (2019-10-07 10:10:33+00:00): You've added noname=yes to a bunch of notes along the ways eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4073250116/history I assume this was a mistaken select all in JOSM, just a hint to be extra careful when making mass edits like that.
eggie (2017-08-09 13:24:22+00:00): Ik begrijp dat je een gebouw wilde weghalen. Er stond nog een klein stukje dat heb ik weggehaald.
R0bst3r (2017-08-09 11:56:36+00:00): Hallo tin-ion,
als Editor würde ich dir von Maps.me abraten. In deinen letzten Änderungen waren einige Tags falsch gesetzt (operator, amenity, name), so dass die Eintragungen nicht richtig angezeigt wurden.
Der Online Editor ist hier besser geeignet. Für Mobiles Editieren würde ich dir Vespucci empfehlen.
Viel Spaß noch!
kocio (2017-08-22 13:59:20+00:00): Hi, you have tagged Bendungan Pandan Duri
as a waterway=dam, but it looks like it's a natural=water and a dam is only around it (like here for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517674288). There are more such problems on this area (Lombok island) and it should be also corrected.
abDoug (2017-09-27 02:27:23+00:00): why do you think you know better about how to map roads in Calgary than the City of Calgary does? These are residential roads, not simple turning loops. Fix them!
Chetan_Gowda (2017-08-09 07:46:01+00:00): Hi chiendroopy,
This building exists or not? You have removed the building tag from it.
Supaplex (2017-08-09 07:24:55+00:00): 這邊的意思是不是基隆的災民會在這裡安置?
DarkenSiva (2017-08-09 09:27:46+00:00): 應該不是
這個地點離基隆那幾個裡都有段距離
DarkenSiva (2017-08-09 09:28:03+00:00): 里
DarkenSiva (2017-08-09 09:31:22+00:00): 且原始資料裡
address="台北市北投區中央北路二段70號" county="基隆市" defaultville="基隆市七堵區瑪東里、瑪西里、友二里"
應該把它的行政區域劃分到基隆，看起來應該是資料本身有問題
Supaplex (2017-08-09 11:07:22+00:00): 但我倒覺得基隆的安置所容量不夠，如果有大型災害需要臺北的收容所支援，所以才特定畫入復興崗營區、信義世貿大樓。

可能得問問相關業務承辦人了
DarkenSiva (2017-08-10 03:28:57+00:00): 稍微查詢了一下，
基隆市社會處公告基隆市民災民避難收容所一覽表
在106年2月(3/7發布)版本http://social.klcg.gov.tw/news/info_view.php?sid=391&dept_id=8&serno=20151210105316)中，
有出現台北世貿一館、三館、南港展覽館、復興崗營區等四處，供基隆市民在輻射災害發生時避難
但是在106年7月(8/1發布)版本 (http://social.klcg.gov.tw/news/info_view.php?sid=2473&dept_id=8&serno=20170801093605)中，
皆不見這四個避難處所，只有一般震災、風災等災害類型的避難處所。
目前無法確定這四處的輻射災害避難所是否會運作。
borovac (2023-01-24 09:57:16+00:00): Hi Andres

You have added street names that different from government data.
Can you check that and confirm that they are really called that.
I found a Mapillary source from 2017 that the street name is the same as in the government data. (It's not the most perfect recording, but the name appears.) I would like to ask you to check this information.

All best Milan (borovac)
borovac (2023-01-24 09:59:28+00:00): 60.0287384, 18.8322411
from here street name is Väddö Kustväg by government data
AndersAndersson (2023-01-24 22:32:24+00:00): Hello
Thanks for asking!

In this case I did a survey at the nothern end of the road. I had no information of the southern end of the road where it was onnected to Nothamnsvägen.
I have now splitted and corrected the name of the southern part.
GerdP (2022-07-10 13:36:47+00:00): Moin!
Ich schaue mir gerade die Twillbäke und diese beiden Gewässer an:
https://www.osm.org/way/1077435371
https://www.osm.org/way/467250101
Für mich sieht es bei Bing so aus, als ob der Bach da durchmäandert. Kennst Du Dich da aus?
~Jhellico (2017-08-11 10:10:01+00:00): Коли ви плануєте довести до кінця полігони сільрад?
zstadler (2017-09-26 16:22:50+00:00): Hi,
.
In this edit you have added http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514141807 but it has no tags and it is not a member of any relation. Can you identify what it is?
.
Thanks!
zstadler (2017-10-02 17:16:14+00:00): Thanks for the correction!
PlaneMad (2017-08-09 09:48:29+00:00): Hi, it looks like a small section of Berliner Ring is deleted, maybe by mistake?

https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/50965695?filters=%7B%22reasons%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Impossible%20angle%20in%20a%20highway%22%2C%22value%22%3A70%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3Anull%7D%5D%7D
MKnight (2017-08-09 10:55:51+00:00): reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50969319
Basstoelpel (2017-08-10 06:23:43+00:00): Hi Geofreund1, die Buchhandlung Leselust ist Dir hier nach Goch verrutscht.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
Geofreund1 (2017-08-10 15:24:34+00:00): ... ist soeben umgezogen nach Kleve ;)
Thierry1030 (2021-08-17 13:15:49+00:00): I already passed several by this place and I think this restaurant is permanently closed. The website is not active anymore. Do you add lifecycle prefixes?
bxl-forever (2021-08-17 15:27:57+00:00): Yes, it has obviously not survived the lockdown and has shut down.  I had spotted this several times but failed to update the map.  I’ve just done it now.
(disused:amenity=restaurant looks fine, indeed)
aceman444 (2017-11-12 21:04:34+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding Polish names to objects in Slovakia. However, you did more than that. In some cases you removed all name tags from rivers (waterway=river). I see some of those river segments are in relations of (type=waterway) that have those names, however I don't see any map that would use the names from the relations. So the rivers are now unnamed. Please put those names back onto waterway=river as they are everywhere else in Slovakia. Thanks.
wmyrda (2017-11-13 16:57:03+00:00): Yeah, I didnt know back then that if move all the name*: including name=* into relation it will no longer show up in the map. I'll fix it this sometime this week
wmyrda (2017-11-20 13:53:25+00:00): This change http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53947781 should fix it.
aceman444 (2017-11-21 22:01:00+00:00): Hi, thanks for the fix. I see you didn't copy all the translated names to the waterway, only the Slovak one (as name), but better than nothing. Thanks ;)
wmyrda (2017-11-21 22:53:13+00:00): It was intended from the start.
name may change for river/stream depending on the country, but name:[country code]=* stays the same for whole waterway. It is better to have it in relation once than repeated everytime on 20,30,50 or more parts of the same river.
R0bst3r (2017-08-13 19:17:55+00:00): Hi again. Doubled Tag, removed it. See other comments.
eggie (2017-08-09 11:02:50+00:00): Waarom voeg je de naam:nl  13 toe aan de placenode van Hoenderloo? Graag reactie.
eggie (2017-08-09 11:08:04+00:00): Ik heb 13 verwijderd, want Hoenderloo heet natuurlijk niet 13. Wanneer je knooppunt 13 bedoelt. Dat ligt een stukje westelijker. De routes en knooppunten is specialistenwerk. Niet aankomen svp als startend mapper. De Veluwe is net op orde gebracht.
eggie (2017-08-09 11:11:52+00:00): Je voegt een camping toe zonder naam. Er is op die plaats al een camping getagd. Ik haal je bijdrage weg.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
eggie (2017-08-09 11:18:26+00:00): Hersteld...svp
-Geen plaatsnamen veranderen in knooppunten.. Dit geeft schade aan de kaart..
-Geen knooppunten toevoegen of iets aan fietsroutes wijzigen. 
-Geen zaken toevoegen die al gemapt zijn.
Graag reactie
BeKri (2017-08-12 23:21:31+00:00): Das ist aber eine komische city ...
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514202354
PT-53 (2017-08-13 09:42:11+00:00): erledigt
mueschel (2017-08-15 20:37:54+00:00): Fixed several 'maxpeed' tags - could you check if I got them all?
aseerel4c26 (2017-08-10 10:50:40+00:00): Info für andere: Entfernte Bilder sind anscheinend alle nicht mehr existierende mit Prefix http://www.flickr.com/photos/osmwolf/.
R0bst3r (2017-08-13 19:16:25+00:00): This castle was tagged doubled. Removed your changes. Your changes are welcome, but please use a better editor!
will1999 (2022-02-06 14:18:04+00:00): I couldn't see any cave entrance by the Ogof Deuben node. Just grass by the road. I'm considering deleting it, unless I missed something?
Warin61 (2017-08-10 22:58:04+00:00): Hi again.
Shared ways. Fixed into relation.
The mapping is of the building - not the way it is constructed, nor the configuration of the roof. 

Any links to why you don't use a relationship to map building voids? 

My reference 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings#How_to_map
"If the building has an interior courtyard the use a Multipolygon relation to ensure that the courtyard is not rendered as part of the building."

The tag 'levels' is depreciated - apparently OSM now uses 'building:levels=*'
SanityChek (2017-08-11 22:46:34+00:00): Multipolygons can cause issues with particular roofs, etc. Whereas coincident, but non re-entrant, nodes should be OK in most practical usages. And as far as 'levels' is concerned, they could do with some consistency - since building:height is to be avoided, In this instance I was only interested in a quick refinement of the building, and levels got the job done.
In the end I'm more interested in getting better mapping of key areas than I am of some OSM view on semantic purity that seems to have no practical point. I do wish they would concentrate more on accurate, up to date maps than database nodes !
Athoss15 (2018-01-07 23:18:13+00:00): Hi!

You deleted a lot of multilingual names of Central European rivers, and later you restored only the local names. What was the reason behind that?
wmyrda (2018-01-08 07:44:04+00:00): I did not delete any names on any rivers. They where moved to the relations. It is better to have them once in one place for whole river than repeated on every single part of the river which even on large rivers can have may have many parts.
Athoss15 (2018-01-08 10:41:57+00:00): It may be simplier, but the multilingual map renderers, like mapcat.com or OsmAnd cannot render the local names of the relations, only the ways. I know, that we don't tag for the renderers, but it's always better to have more data, than less.
Yes, long rivers can have many parts, but in JOSM in the Download URL menu you can download all parts with one click, if you enter the URL of the relation, and you can add a new localized language for all of the parts also with one click, so I think it's not a reson for deleting multiligual data.
wmyrda (2018-01-08 10:49:28+00:00): Once again - I did not remove /delete any data just moved it to more appropriate location database wise. Over the years in forums I read time and again we do not tag for any particular renderer just to improve the database. If you know better and copy those names back it is fine by me, but do not count on me to do it.
SomeoneElse (2018-12-09 12:53:12+00:00): You've changed the 0844 number for NUFC here - is that valid?  Can you actually dial 0844 numbers internationally?
confusedbuffalo (2018-12-10 18:05:45+00:00): Possibly not, I hadn't realised that at the time though
Pitoresker Pi (2017-08-31 15:21:06+00:00): Danke fürs Eintragen dieses Denkmals. Der Name ist jedoch ganz sicher nicht "Unbekanntes Denkmal II". Ich gehe eher davon aus, dass dieses Denkmal keinen eigentlichen Namen hat (wie z.B. "Kaiser-Wilhelm-Denkmal" oder so).
Rodrigo Rega (2017-08-17 14:01:59+00:00): Hola Daneil,

Los lavaderos se deben etiquetar como: 
"amenity=lavoir" en lugar de "tourism=attraction".

Un saludo y gracias por tus aportes al mapa.
R0bst3r (2017-08-13 19:01:04+00:00): Hi GelreJoe again,
you changed the name of a courthouse to the old_name. Your changes are welcome, but please use a better editor, like iD on openstreetmap.org or JOSM etc.
I have undone your invalid change and corrected the name again.
Cheers, R0bst3r
R0bst3r (2017-08-13 19:11:31+00:00): Your renamed Schloss Haimendorf is actually called Fürer Schloss. You changed the wrong castle?
Sébastien Este (2020-10-05 08:50:10+00:00): Bonjour, le bivouac d'Engreux n'existe plus. Un nouveau site a été créé à la confluence des deux Ourthes. Merci de faire la mise à jour.
SomeoneElse (2017-08-09 13:25:20+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.
Have you any idea how incorrect latitude and longitude values could have got into the data that you added?
Best Regards,
Andy
Jonas official (2017-08-09 14:42:35+00:00): I dont know exact answer, but what i can say probably might be due to differences in projection coordinate system UTM that was set during the GPS track photogeometry
gausserrorfunction (2017-08-09 12:36:05+00:00): Maybe somebody else has an idea whether Cima degli Orsi and Motto Rotondo are one and the same. At the moment I think so, yet this peak seems to have history of naming unclarity associated to it, see <http://www.hikr.org/gallery/photo1946824.html?post_id=102812#1>
GerdP (2017-08-23 05:57:07+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
You have added a roundabout with highway=* here. I fear the wiki for junction=roundabout is missleading:"Also tag the roundabout and approaches with highway=*, the same as the connecting roads."
Whenever you find highway=* in the wiki it means something like "highway tag with a reasonable value". I've changed it to highway=secondary now.
Self-Perfection (2017-08-09 21:32:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. Очень неаккуратная правка у вас, много чужой работы испорчено. Например взялись вы переносить информацию о музыкальной школе с точки https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4431570502 на здание. Вообще указать сущность на карте не точкой, а занимаемой ей территорий это хорошо, это уточнение, но тогда уж нужно было переносить не на здание, а на территорию очерченную забором. В данном случае из неё нужно было сделать мультиполигон. И главное, вы потеряли множество тегов удалённой точки. Там было отмечено
amenity=music_school
education=facultative_school
education_form:parttime=yes
education_level:primary=yes
education_profile:music=yes
education_system:ru_standard=yes
name:ru=Музыкальная школа им. Шебалина
name=Музыкальная школа им. Шебалина

А вы указали только name.
Self-Perfection (2017-08-09 21:35:34+00:00): Ещё пример. На здании https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31064729/history почему-то выставили теги name=Царицыно
tourism=guest_house и ухудшили точность указания типа здания, вместо многоквартирного жилого дома building=apartments стало просто building=yes. Это явно ошибка, возвращаю как было.
Self-Perfection (2017-08-09 21:44:12+00:00): Указанный 2 ошибки я исправил: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50984764

Может вам в будущем стоит просматривать свои пакеты правок, чтобы видеть, что вы наизменяли. Это можно удобно делать так https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#50972284 или так https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50972284
Piskvor (2017-08-10 07:46:00+00:00): Dobrý den, ta budova je včelín, nebo se jmenuje Včelín?
literan (2017-08-09 12:51:02+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо вам за правки, однако хочу попросить не помещать в тег name все подряд ("теннисный корт", "футбольно-хоккейное поле" и др. описания). Это поле - только для имен собственных, остальное задается тегами. Поправлю.
Андрей Николаев (2017-08-11 12:03:33+00:00): Теперь понял, спасибо!
py_berrard (2017-08-09 13:14:14+00:00): police check is permanent?
Jan van Bekkum (2017-08-10 14:14:05+00:00): It looks like it is it least for a longer period; I guess dependent on the European migration and terrorism issues.
Jan van Bekkum (2017-08-10 14:14:42+00:00): It is the first exit from the Belgian border.
py_berrard (2017-08-10 14:38:17+00:00): ok, thank you for answering
dmlu (2018-03-23 13:01:24+00:00): Is this road still closed?
Jan van Bekkum (2018-03-23 19:37:07+00:00): I don't know. I haven't been there since mid last year.
ACarlotti (2019-12-16 04:01:10+00:00): You seem to have changed a lot of roads around Dover from highway=tertiary to highway=service. I'm pretty sure that most of these were errors, and you only intended to make changes to the port roads. I have therefore reverted this change in changeset 78448114 for all the roads outside the port that hadn't yet been reverted.

While I'm here, I have a more general remark about your changeset comments. These are often not very descriptive - for example I looked at four different changesets with the changeset comment "Road(s) amended" and saw that they were doing very different things. Better changeset comments in those cases would have been something like "Change roads in Dover Port to highway=service", "Add X road to map", "Update speed limit on part of X road" and "Correct name of X road". i

More precise comments (like those I suggested) make it a lot easier to check what changesets are intended to do without looking at them in detail, and would make it clear that (a) editing the other roads outside the port in this changeset was a mistake; and (b) no other changesets at the same time were doing similar things, so there's no reason to check those changesets for the same sort of mistake.