piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
parukhin (2019-02-26 05:56:19+00:00): Коллега, здравствуйте.
Подскажите, пожалуйста, источник адресов, которые вносите в Еманжелинске?
iWowik (2019-11-23 16:00:09+00:00): Здравствуйте, CIV1986!
Возможно вы пропустили уведомления о комментарии, поэтому повторю вопрос parukhin'а, который меня тоже интересует.
Где вы берете информацию об адресах домиков?
gscscnd (2019-02-03 08:53:05+00:00): Jak wyżej, tutaj addr:place nie dodajemy.
Krewetek (2019-02-03 09:13:59+00:00): Teraz wydaje mi się, że jest dobrze. Dziękuje za komentarz
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:36:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
dktue (2019-02-03 09:17:13+00:00): Das ist ja wirklich übel -- solche Fehler zu finden ist außergewöhnlich schwer.
Toll, dass Du so kritisch prüfst!
ajf3934221 (2019-02-03 09:29:03+00:00): Dort hab ich sogar mal gewohnt :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:36:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
user_5359 (2022-04-12 15:11:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667942766/history. What is the meaning of the tag religion = seccion_11?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:35:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-26 21:36:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 67597451, 67594431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problem changes in Africa following complaint to DWG (a revert was thought to be the least-worst option).  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2533 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2762871.
Dimacn (2019-02-04 06:56:15+00:00): Пожалуйста не выдумывайте названия объектам. В name заносим только официальные названия. Перенесите информацию из name в тег description. Подробнее:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
muramototomoya (2019-02-17 07:15:23+00:00): Hello.
Thank you for contributing to OSM.

I would ask you why you changed `railway` of Tokyu Toyoko line from `rail` to `light_rail`.
I think Tokyu Toyoko line is not a light rail transit.
Diego Sanguinetti (2019-03-29 15:04:21+00:00): Thank you. Unfortunately Openstreetmap does not have a efficent notification system to know that comment. To the point, the Wikipedia article labels the route as "Commuter rail". Reviewing the documentation, I think it is recommend tag to "light_train".
muramototomoya (2019-03-29 20:59:53+00:00): Thank you for your response.
>Wikipedia article labels the route as "Commuter rail".
Would you show its link?

At least in Japan, Wikipedia article says Setagaya line is the only "light rail" in Tokyo.
https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%A9%E3%82%A4%E3%83%88%E3%83%AC%E3%83%BC%E3%83%AB#%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5

If you have another opinion, please contact to Japanese community.
Diego Sanguinetti (2019-04-04 18:00:46+00:00): Thank you for inviting the community, unfortunately I do not speak the Japanese language (but I research the area, as wide as possible). I think about these links can contribute to the community.

Commuter rail is similar to "light rail" in OSM Documentation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=light_rail.
For Tokyu line, the article link of English Wikipedia is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C5%8Dky%C5%AB_T%C5%8Dyoko_Line
muramototomoya (2019-04-05 12:07:16+00:00): Thanks.
>Commuter rail is similar to "light rail" in OSM Documentation: 
It's sorry I cannot find a document which describes that commuter rail is a kind of "light rail".

>unfortunately I do not speak the Japanese language
No problem, you can post your opinion in English. Some members in Japanese community can read/write English. 
Mailing list or facebook would be fine.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja
https://www.facebook.com/groups/osmjapan/
iz11 (2020-01-16 18:59:33+00:00): Szia!
Ez a sziklafal nem létezik:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667958506

Ugyanitt kőfelület sincs:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667958503

Csak a fedetlen kút van:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6254648383/history

fénykép:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Qnr8HRumph5Uyn5k8
zsolt d (2020-01-16 22:51:03+00:00): Szia!
Kőfelület a kút alján van. Töröltem, mert valóban, mire meglátod, már késő..
De a fotón is éppenhogy egy kör alakú szakadékot látni, nem egy kutat.  Függőleges köves falú omladék, amibe szépen beszakadsz. Szakadék. A kút szimbólum, és a fedetlen kút felirat használható, de épp fedél néküli vízvételi helyet jelöl. Odamész inni, oszt nem felfrissülsz a kútból, hanem zsupsz beszakadsz a francba, mint a szerencsétlen spanyol kisfiú. Veszélyt jelző szimbólum kellene a térképre, ha már itt turista térkép szintű. Meg le kellene keríteni és lefedni. Amíg fel nem tellik óvatlan turistákkal, nem is veszi észre senki a bajt. Hogy lehet a veszélyt grafikusan jelezni a térképen?
eerib (2022-05-20 03:18:50+00:00): Dear Kelsey John Torok,

I've reverted this changeset after confirming that users are still taking the trails and that markers still exist. This trail has been deleted in the past and claimed to be decommissioned but that isn't the case. I will update the trails tagging to further discourage their use.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-13 07:38:33+00:00): Is use of surface=timber (rather than surface=wood) on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9516821/history intentional?

Would it be fine to use standard surface=wood?

If not - what you wanted to express here by using a distinct surface?
DaveF (2023-03-13 13:38:06+00:00): Hi
If you wish to amend, please feel free.
mike140 (2019-02-04 11:10:43+00:00): Нужно ли указывать территорию, если объектом охраны является одно дерево? При этом у вас в эту территорию попали здания академии. Рядом имеются еще два подобных объекта. Это три разных дерева или все же одно? Если одно, думаю стоит два других удалить. (Кстати, на основной карте OSM отображается только "Дуб Лялі Убийвовк")
Tupikov Andrey (2019-02-07 08:57:58+00:00): Приветствую!
Спасибо за критику.
Сначала отмечу, что выгрузки объектов мы делаем по установчим документам объекта ПЗО. Однако часто точность картографического материала не позволяет указать местоположение максимально точно - есть только приблизительное место.
В этом случае мы все равно его наносим так как в документах ну или так как смогли сориентироваться.
Готовы к сотрудничеству по уточнению границ ) Если Вы обладаете более точным месторасположением объекта - давайте править и ставить его на место.
Matthew Darwin (2019-02-10 15:05:15+00:00): Hello, there seems to be some issue with the Beaver Dam relation.  The inner an outer relations intersect with each other.  Could you verify?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2019-02-10 15:14:56+00:00): The inner relation is a first nations reserve which is not a part of HRM
frodrigo (2019-02-10 15:21:04+00:00): As the inner is on the side. Can be juste removed from the relation?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2019-02-10 19:18:34+00:00): I see what your saying I have to give it  aa try
Dartmouthmapmaker (2019-02-10 22:54:52+00:00): I cleaned up the boundaries  so Beaver Lake 17 + Beaver Dam share a way plus Beaver Lake 17 +Pleasant Valley  share a way
frodrigo (2019-02-11 08:49:43+00:00): This relation is still open: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577608854
Dartmouthmapmaker (2019-02-11 13:45:02+00:00): The way is part of a r
elation
frodrigo (2019-02-11 13:55:48+00:00): Sorry, you are right!
R0bst3r (2019-02-06 09:06:14+00:00): Hallo jonemo,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66866341
fayor (2019-02-03 15:29:50+00:00): Se qualche attività non ti piace, o non la condividi, o semplicemente non la capisci, non significa che sia fatta "senza motivo" o che "danneggi la mappa"
tosky (2019-02-04 09:27:19+00:00): La modifica non aveva nessun appiglio sulla documentazione del tag place=square, tanto per cominciare.

Uniamo questo al fatto che la modifica è stata inserito in un megachangset che includeva modifiche disparate in giro, cosa che va contro tutte le buone pratiche di gestione del cambiamento (anche sul codice sorgente dei programmi).
In generale, inizia a fare modifiche che non comprendano territori vasti e centinaia di punti.

Spero di non dover andare a rinvangare discussioni passate.
manings (2019-02-05 15:47:57+00:00): Reverted graffiti via changeset/66935756
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66866762
giggls (2019-02-03 18:10:25+00:00): Hallo,

kannst Du da mal was zu sagen? Ich kenne an dieser Stelle keinen Wohnmobilabstellplatz und Dein name bzw. name:de tag sieht auch ziemlich schräg aus.
joost schouppe (2019-02-11 20:54:11+00:00): This restaurant was on the map already, for 10 months. Normally, maps.me does regular automatic updates, but maybe you can force an update. If you can't, maybe better to leave a note than an actual point of interest
kapazao (2023-01-14 11:51:42+00:00): Hola, ¿podrías revisar la vía https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667958620?
No cuadra que sea un muelle ahí, más bien será un puente que se parezca a un muelle, para eso se puede etiquetar con bridge:structure y cosas así.

Justo al lado hay un puente al que has llamado "Puente colgante", lo cual no creo que sea su nombre propio. Ya con el etiquetado se sabe que es un puente colgante.

Por otra parte las vías de la Ruta del Gollizno no creo que se tengan que llamar con el nombre de la ruta, podrían tener otro nombre y además, ¿qué pasaría si por ahí pasaran varias rutas, le damos varios nombres a las vías?
Deberían suprimirse los nombres de rutas de las vías.

Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones
viloan (2019-02-02 23:32:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-02-02 23:33:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
manings (2019-02-05 09:35:17+00:00): Removed graffiti which was part of this edit via: changeset/66925970
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/66867251
ma-rt-in (2019-02-03 12:33:42+00:00): Hallo,
bitte keine werte wie shop_x verwenden, das wird keiner auswerten. Entweder getrennte POI´s verwenden oder es in die description reinpacken.
vg
4004 (2019-02-03 13:47:27+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
только man_made=tower забыли, добавил
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
viloan (2019-02-03 00:26:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
viloan (2019-02-03 00:35:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
joost schouppe (2020-07-12 11:04:58+00:00): Hi padvinder,
We recieved this anonymous complaint about these tracks you added, see: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2261005
Since you mapped it with GoMap, I suppose you were on the ground? Do you happen to remember anything indicating that these tracks are private? (like gates or signs)
I'll mark them as private for now, but we can always reconsider.
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-03 00:59:52+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 66852089, 66852103.
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-03 01:42:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 66835307.
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
tomhukins (2019-08-13 16:30:04+00:00): Hi, I'm fairly sure this is a mistake: there's no castle here.
tomhukins (2019-08-16 08:37:57+00:00): I'm fairly sure it's a mistake, so I removed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73404584
woodpeck (2019-02-03 11:04:34+00:00): "xy" is not a useful changeset comment. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for an explanation why it is important to use this feature.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-03 07:55:25+00:00): The name tag should be reserved for actual place names, not descriptions. Also, please keep in mind that this is a public map, "Our neighbors house across the street." as a name is not information that should be included.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-03 07:59:34+00:00): Please be more careful, there was two problems with this edit:

1) You added a duplicate node for Edison Elementary school, this already existed on the map.

2) You dragged the intersection of Agate Street and East 22nd Ave way off to the side to it overlapped itself.
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-03 08:06:48+00:00): Hayward Field was duplicated three times here, please be more careful.
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
aceman444 (2019-02-22 23:53:43+00:00): Zdravim, "on appointment" piseme aj po slovensky. Opravil som. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3885753315
Jose Riha (2019-03-31 21:12:26+00:00): dakujem, nechce sa Vam na to vyrobit JOSM rule? idealne aj rovno s automatickou moznostou opravy ("on appointment" => "na objednavku/on appointment")
aceman444 (2019-03-31 21:25:10+00:00): Neviem nakolko by to bolo mozne, kedze vacsinou su tieto casy na prevadzkach uvedene ako Mo-Fr "na objednavku", pripadne aj s casom Mo-Fr 08:00-16:00 "na objednavku". Neviem nakolko by to automaticke pravidlo vedelo s tymto narabat (teda ze by v retazci zmenilo len "on appointment" => "na objednavku/on appointment", ci naopak "na objednavku" => "na objednavku/on appointment").
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-03 08:07:57+00:00): This is already on the map.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-03 08:07:45+00:00): This is already on the map.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-03 08:03:51+00:00): This is already on the map.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-03 07:50:52+00:00): Hi, this isn't the way to map features like this. I think you would benefit from going through the tutorial and visiting pages like https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ to freshen up on your OSM knowledge.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-03 08:03:19+00:00): Incorrect changeset comment here, added path ran through buildings, didn't match imagery and had a descriptive name.
Polarbear-repair (2019-02-22 18:23:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully by the DWG in changesets 67474815, 67473459 where the changeset comment is: revert fictive suburbs created by Frostwindz and PotatoCity, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2541
WoodWoseWulf (2019-02-03 07:46:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! It seems you've added a duplicate of Mission Avenue which already exists on the map!