piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
L'imaginaire (2022-03-24 22:22:25+00:00): De aanpassingen zien er goed uit, mooi werk!
Dat de wijzigingen niet direct zichtbaar zijn op alle zoomniveaus is normaal. De kaart bestaat eigenlijk uit allemaal afzonderlijke prentjes en die worden niet altijd rechstreeks van de server opgehaald, maar vaak ook uit het cache geheugen. Je kan jouw browser forceren om de lokale cache te negeren door te herladen met ctrl + F5, maar ook dan zit er een beetje vertraging op wat je hebt geëditeerd en wat je te zien krijgt op de kaart. Na verloop van tijd zullen alle afzonderlijke prentjes vernieuwd worden en krijg je de situatie te zien zoals je die gemapt hebt (en als je de kaart bewerkt, krijg je sowieso steeds de actuele status)
gscholz (2022-07-16 06:33:53+00:00): Hi Martí,
the footway "24 de març" is overlapping with a lot of other ways: 

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=2.03403&lat=41.66473&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

May be this is meant to be a hiking route. Can you please educate yourself about how to add such features to OSM:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes#Tagging_walking_and_hiking_route_networks

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
kakiremora (2022-03-27 19:51:25+00:00): WIdzę, że ta zmiana została już wycofana.
Na przyszłość zmiany kategorii ważnych dróg lub dużej ilości dróg należy zawsze skonsultować ze społecznością maperów OSM, np. na Forum OSM.
kartonage (2022-03-24 14:36:32+00:00): Hej and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

your editing patterns look strange. Can you explain what you are trying to achieve here? This does not look like useful contributions (even when you delete them afterwards).

https://osmcha.org/changesets/118866175/ and earlier changesets creating and deleting similiar objects.

Best regards
CorruptComputer (2022-03-24 15:01:32+00:00): They are not the only account creating and deleting this exact shape over and over again, for another example of this type of vandalism see the following:

https://osmcha.org/?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22qiman%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22qiman%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%7D
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118866175
marczoutendijk (2022-03-24 20:50:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5825


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Lepuse (2022-07-07 15:07:04+00:00): Be careful when you see features that don't exist on satellite images, satellite images are often out of date and your edits based on outdated satellite images are wrong. This changeset will be reverted.
krusefahrer (2022-03-26 16:52:21+00:00): Please don't merge landuses with rivers.
pantufla (2022-03-28 07:12:59+00:00): Hmm, what do you mean? Can you please ellaborate?
user_5359 (2022-03-27 07:13:03+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/758683198. What is the meaning of the tag fixing_osm_roads = l7tktmask? Did you know the key fixme?
krusefahrer (2022-03-24 14:22:13+00:00): Hi Jesse,

I would invent a new tag for moorings and not use the generic pier tag just for the rendering.
JesseFTW (2022-03-25 00:04:07+00:00): That line is also a pier, very clearly, though. I think whoever added it previously just didn't mark it as such.
JesseFTW (2022-03-25 00:07:37+00:00): I can't actually tell if this pier is signed as a place where "boats are explicitly permitted to moor" as it says on the wiki for https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mooring -- but it's clear from the aerial images that it satisfies the criteria at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpier
stephankn (2023-04-06 17:56:51+00:00): These signs indicate maxweight: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Thailand_road_sign_%E0%B8%9A-33.svg
Helium314 (2022-06-13 06:20:46+00:00): I know Esri images are nice because of the high resolution in this area, but please also check newer imagery when adding stuff.
E.g. parking https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043464449 hasn't existed for at least a year.
ZLima12 (2022-03-28 02:57:57+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you deleted a driveway that's still visible from satellite imagery. Are you sure it doesn't exist anymore?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118868234
theurbanexploringman (2022-05-17 11:55:16+00:00): I'm positive it doesn't, thank you.
pitfire (2022-04-02 13:53:27+00:00): Hallo Plettenberger KulTour GmbH,
bitte verwenden Sie den Eintrag "description" gemäß den Regeln 
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description?uselang=de)
OSM ist keine Werbeplattform sondern eine Geodatenbank.  
Danke und Gruß
CorruptComputer (2022-03-24 15:15:46+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM! 

Thank you for your contributions, one small thing though. In the future could you make sure edit the existing features, rather than deleting and replacing them?

This preserves the history of the object, and also allows map apps with the ability to bookmark locations to work properly.

For example, this was deleted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043464526

And replaced with this: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043469058
kartonage (2022-03-29 19:32:29+00:00): Hi,

I had to clean up most of the buildings you have added in the town since they were duplicates of already mapped buildings. Some where added hours before you uploaded yours. Unfortunately yours were of poorer quality. 

I suggest always keeping your map data in JOSM as up-to-date as possible in an active hotosm-project to avoid conflicts with other mappers mapping the same area. 

Best regards
Abiodun Adewara (2022-03-29 22:41:53+00:00): fixed the error
DUGA (2022-03-27 16:58:55+00:00): Seriously?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390840823#map=18/33.88227/-84.29170

This building is not just for CDC.
zluuzki (2022-03-28 04:09:59+00:00): what a horrible problem whole map is broken now!1!1!!!!
marczoutendijk (2022-03-24 16:38:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5822
BCNorwich (2022-03-29 07:39:58+00:00): Hi, In fixing the dragged node you have now deleted the offending node. this deletion has disconnected the path, Way: 980657586 from the road  Way: 980657589.

This is not the way to reinstate the previous position of dragged nodes. You have to restore the dragged nodes position not delete it.

I've reverted your changes and then reinstated the position of the dragged node. It is very easy to inadvertently make this sort of mistake so it's best to double-check for mistakes before uploading changes.

Regards Bernard.
mirikaaa (2022-04-27 13:03:37+00:00): Hi, BCNorwich! Thank you for writing about this issue and also for fixing this case. In the future, we will be more attentive to such edits and expand our knowledge of mapping. Best Regards,Mapbox.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118869867
SekeRob (2022-08-26 10:19:29+00:00): Hi,

Your redaction of 5 months ago did not resolve 1 MAJOR issue. This 'trail' on mapped on top of other ways for most of the way causing navigation routing issues. A route relation should be created of the hiking or walking type such as I've done for tappa 1 and 2 (which I need to redo properly). Tappa 1 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14468270#map=17/41.49185/13.83158.

Those etappes can be combined in one long route putting tappa 1-5 together.

Let me know if you will plan to address this big issue.

trad:

La tua redazione di 5 mesi fa non ha risolto 1 problema MAGGIORE. Questo "percorso" è stato mappato in aggiunta ad altri modi per la maggior parte del percorso causando problemi di instradamento di navigazione. Dovrebbe essere creata una relazione di percorso del tipo escursionismo o camminata come ho fatto per le tappa 1 e 2 (che devo rifare correttamente). Tappa 1 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14468270#map=17/41.49185/13.83158.

Quelle etappe possono essere combinate in un lungo percorso mettendo insieme le tappe 1-5.

Fammi sapere se hai intenzione di affrontare questo grosso problema.

Ciao
AngocA (2022-03-25 02:18:46+00:00): Hola Carlos, de nuevo yo. Veo que hiciste una adición que me parece va más allá de la EEZ. Ya que lo más la occidente es Malpelo y de ahí se cuenta el mar territorial + contiguo + eez. En esta página he estado documentando esto para que quede bien sustentado: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Proyecto-Fronteras_Mar%C3%ADtimas
Si ves otros mapas, el extremo occidental es curvo y va con respecto a Malpelo.
Taya_S (2024-04-13 10:57:06+00:00): Hi, I just stumbled upon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043474699

Is this correctly mapped? It only has a source tag and is not part of any relation

Sincerely,
Taya
BCNorwich (2022-03-24 19:30:45+00:00): Hi, 
I've removed your new area outline Way: outer boundary defined (1043475948) as it's fiction. The outline of the golf_course named Clacton-on-Sea Golf Club is already mapped as Way: Clacton-on-Sea Golf Club (26834535).

I don't know what you were trying to achieve but please try not to accidentally upload fiction.

Regards Bernard.
LMDenny (2022-03-24 20:02:50+00:00): As you know from previous correspondence I am long retired and trying to recreate some golfing experiences from my younger days. The instructions are difficult to follow and I was not intending to upload fiction. Perhaps you can tell me how I create the course area map to work with the TGC-Designer-Tools. There are no tutorials that I can locate despite searching online.
BCNorwich (2022-03-25 08:09:45+00:00): Hi, The only tutorial I can find is here:- https://tinyurl.com/3pcvbteb

I don't think this would be very helpful to you though. The TGC-Designer-Tools seem to be directed mainly to the USA.

I downloaded the tools and tutorial and could not make sense of anything.

Anyway the tools and OSM are not linked, though the tools can draw data from OSM. Our problem here is to maintain the integrity of OSM and not alter/amend it for the sake of another product. The OSM data must be ground truth.

I'm sorry but I can't help with the TGC-Designer-Tools. If you need help with OSM mapping I'd be glad to help.

Regards Bernard.
LMDenny (2022-03-25 09:41:04+00:00): Thanks, Bernard. Useful tutorial link thanks. It is USA biased, and the lidar data over here comes from the Defra site. The section on Editing OpenStreetMap is indeed brief with a promise to create a detailed tutorial in due course. I will tread carefully in future and appreciate your drawing it to my attention. In fact I'm only looking at 2 or 3 courses in the region so not going to be a long term project. Thanks again, Lionel
EdLoach (2022-07-01 10:34:28+00:00): Hi Bernard. Looks like you forgot to delete https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043475948 - doing so now. Ed
BCNorwich (2022-03-27 08:32:16+00:00): Hi, Unfortunately, your edit to fix a dragged node has resulted in or left several other anomalies. dragged nodes, deleted boundaries, and lots of untagged unconnected single nodes.

As well as the problems I mention this changeset also warns you above of 3 crossing_ways:highway-highway, 2 crossing_ways:highway-waterway and 1 disconnected_way:highway.

These problems may not all be yours and could be on several changesets, but could you have a look at this please?

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2022-03-27 08:36:58+00:00): I now see there are some duplicated highways as well:- Way: 1043479442 and parts of Way: 49926940
BCNorwich (2022-03-29 07:23:01+00:00): I forgot to say that there are lots of single untagged nodes in the area these may be left from your deletions.
InnaSumskaya (2022-03-31 13:09:51+00:00): Hi, BCNorwich! Sorry for a long response and thank you for your fix. I am working on fixing other mistakes.
allseasonhiker (2022-03-24 19:41:44+00:00): Hi. If you want to split an existing trail, first select an existing point on the trail. You can also create a new point on the trail by double clicking on the line.

Next, you'll want to right click on this point and select 'Split', which looks like a pair of scissors.

You may need to zoom out until the whole trail is visible
allseasonhiker (2022-03-24 19:42:02+00:00): before the split option is available. Hope this helps!
allseasonhiker (2022-03-24 19:42:49+00:00): If you are still stuck, send me a message and I'll give you a hand.
chris66 (2022-10-04 07:04:15+00:00): Achtung: Neues Tagging für Packstationen: amenity=parcel_locker.

Bitte updaten. :-) 
Danke.
Patchanka (2022-04-02 09:09:33+00:00): bonjour
j'ai l'impression qu'il y a une discordance entre votre commentaire "itinéraire VTT Le Bager" et la relation créée. En effet toute la partie à Eysus semble correspondre à votre commentaire (VTT 76 Le Bager) mais est dans la relation VTT n°75 "Bords du Gave".
Normalement ça devrait être 2 relations différentes, non ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13959174#map=13/43.1486/-0.5457
MaxR_6429 (2022-04-02 13:58:35+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci pour votre commentaire, je vais vérifier cela.
AngocA (2022-03-25 02:10:55+00:00): Hola Carfog81. Veo que hiciste unos cambios en las fronteras marítimas, pero incluiste el EEZ como territorial y no es así. Las fronteras marítimas son: baseline para tomar un punto base, después es la territorial, después la contigua, y finalmente la Zona Económica Exclusiva. Las que muestra OSM en sus teselas es la territorial, aún si los tratados de Colombia hacen más que todo referencia a las EEZ.
Carto'Cité (2022-08-17 17:01:12+00:00): Bonjour Bernard,
Je me suis permis de modifier cette route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151577460) pour passer de cycleway=lane à shoulder=yes car il me semble qu'il ne s'agit pas de bande cyclable mais bien d'un accotement (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shoulder). Je n'ai observé aucun élément qui permettait de dire qu'il s'agit d'une bande cyclable mais j'ai peut-être manqué quelque chose donc surtout n’hésite pas à me faire tes retours.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
itineris (2024-02-17 19:46:11+00:00): Szia!

Légy szíves, legközelebb ne húzz utat egy másik út tetejére!

Üdv:
Ákos
SekeRob (2022-03-24 17:29:57+00:00): Ciao e Benvenuto da OSM,

Ho applica qualche correzioni a tuo addizioni nel Caramanico, particolare i formato del nr telefono, prefisso internazionale, cambia phone > phone:mobile perché qualche e numeri cellulare e i orari di apertura bisogno un formato specifiche, in inglese (visita i wiki ;o)

Buon mappatura
SekeRob (2022-03-24 17:31:17+00:00): PS, I cambi trovano nel https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118874188
20180911 (2022-03-24 16:42:42+00:00): Source was Survey and Bing aerial imagery this time.
eggie (2022-04-01 11:07:59+00:00): Hoe kun je dit nu met GoMap doen. Het zijn allemaal multipolygonen. Wanneer je die onderbreekt dan krijg je dus dit.
Ik zal het proberen te  herstellen. 
Eens kijken of dan de landuse weer terugkomt. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-04-01 11:26:36+00:00): De gebroken polygoon hersteld

De rendering is weer terug.
Mijn advies zou zijn om josm te gebruiken bij dit soort mp's Het is vragen om problemen als je een beperkte editor als GoMap gebruikt.
MVG
eggie
ChillyDL (2022-03-24 23:05:46+00:00): Hallo Puck201104, ich bin neugierig: Du hast einige der Steinkisten im der Bischofswiese mit access=no getaggt, also dass es verboten ist, zu ihnen zu gehen oder sie zu betreten. Ergibt sich das daraus, dass sie im Naturschutzgebiet liegen (wo die Wege nicht verlassen werden dürfen, was man aber müsste, um zu den Steinkisten zu kommen), oder gibt es dort noch Extra-Verbote oder Hindernisse?
puck201104 (2022-03-25 17:52:30+00:00): Hallo,

die so gekennzeichneten Gräber sind für Laien vor Ort nicht auffindbar. Mein Anliegen ist es, andere nicht wie mich dort hinzuführen mit der Erwartung, man könnte dort eine Sehenswürdigkeit bestaunen. Unter den gegebenen Auswahloptionen der POI-Merkmale erscheint mir die Deklaration "no access" am treffendsten.

Grüße, Hendryk
ChillyDL (2022-03-25 21:34:32+00:00): Hallo Hendryk,
ah, ich verstehe. Ja, das ist über den Webbrowser etwas missverständlich. Der Tag „access“ („Erlaubter Zugang“ im Programm iD, das du über den Browser genutzt hast) beschreibt nur die rechtliche Situation. Zufällig stimmt access=no, was du eingetragen hast, da es auf der Bischofswiese wie in jedem Naturschutzgebiet verboten ist, die Wege zu verlassen, was man müsste, um zu den Gräbern zu kommen (wobei es eigentlich überflüssig ist, denn das Gebiet ist als Naturschutzgebiet eingezeichnet, und damit ist das klar). 

Um zu kennzeichnen, dass ein Objekt nicht so sehenswert ist, ist access= nicht geeignet. Bei den Gräbern wäre das eher building:condition=. Hier die Dokumentation dazu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building:condition

In welchem Zustand sind die von dir bearbeiten Steinkisten denn? „Nur mehr sehr geringe Reste erkennbar“? Das wäre wertvoll, hier zu dokumentieren.
puck201104 (2022-03-27 16:38:35+00:00): Die Grabhügel mit Steinkisten Nr. 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 27 sind für das Auge eines nicht-fachmännischen Betrachters vom Weg aus nicht erkennbar; Grabhügel Nr. 5 dagegen sehr gut. Weitere Grabhügel habe ich noch nicht aufgesucht.
eggie (2022-04-01 11:02:15+00:00): Het lijkt me niet handig om deze ingewikkelde landuse met GoMap te lijf te gaan.
Al het werk dat ik hier heb verricht is weer teniet gedaan. Waarom geen overleg?
Wat is hier dan verkeerd.. Er is hier geen landuse?
Ben je hier ter plekke geweest?
Ik zie het als vernieling van de kaart.
Gr eggie
Vinber (2022-03-27 16:47:57+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour votre ajout d'une table de ping pong, ce qui ne correspond pas tout à fait à votre description (j'ai juste changé un nom).
Étant donné que vous devez faire parti d'une classe qui a eu cours de SNT jeudi aprem, pourriez vous s'il vous plaît signaler ceci à votre enseignant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/bonnes-pratiques-osm-en-snt

Par avance merci
Vincent
Vinber (2022-03-27 16:49:36+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour vos ajouts de restaurants (attention cependant car vous avez supprimé le fait que ces restaurant sont dans des batiments).

Étant donné que vous devez faire parti d'une classe qui a eu cours de SNT jeudi aprem, pourriez vous s'il vous plaît signaler ceci à votre enseignant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/bonnes-pratiques-osm-en-snt

Par avance merci
Vincent
Vinber (2022-03-27 16:53:01+00:00): à non autant pour moi, vous n'avez pas supprimé le batiment, c'est moi qui est mal lu, mais n'hésitez cependant pas à faire suivre à votre enseignant le lien précédent :D
SomeoneElse (2022-03-26 11:16:40+00:00): Hello luxiaghd and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please use changeset comments that explain what your changes actually are and what sources you used.  That way, people will be able to understand better what you have changed.
Best Regards,
Andy
hsc666 (2022-03-24 18:55:18+00:00): Hallo taygeta und willkommen bei OSM!

Hast Du ein Bild von der Beschriftung der Straße? Was ist die Quelle Deiner Änderung? Die Post kennt hier nur eine Rainstraße. 

VG
hsc666
taygeta (2022-03-24 20:06:58+00:00): Hallo!
Ich habe gerade nochmal bei Ortsansässigen nachgefragt und tatsächlich habe ich mich getäuscht. Tut mir leid! Ich war mir so sicher.
hsc666 (2022-03-24 21:04:04+00:00): Stellst Du den ursprünglichen Zustand dann wieder her?
berndw (2022-03-25 18:32:03+00:00): Hab den Namen wieder auf Rainstraße gesetzt ;-)
Vinber (2022-03-27 16:56:19+00:00): Bonjour,
vous semblez avoir déplacé un point de repère, est-ce voulu ?

Sinon pour le cous de SNT, pouvez vous aussi faire suivre ce lien à votre enseignant-e svp https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/bonnes-pratiques-osm-en-snt

Bonne journée
Vincent
Vinber (2022-03-27 17:01:10+00:00): Bonjour,
vous dites avoir ajouté des maisons avec la bd ortho de l'ign, mais on ne voit pas de maisons sur cette dernière. Je pense que vous avez utilisé une autre source non? et peut-être votre connaissance locale non ?

Et sinon je suppose cours snt, donc pouvez vous faire suivre svp à votre enseignant-e- ceci
https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/bonnes-pratiques-osm-en-snt

Bonne journée
Vincent
Q-OSM (2023-04-19 14:17:49+00:00): Ta modification est incorrecte.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N'utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d%C3%A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/8/87/Les_10_cOSMandements.pdf
Vinber (2022-03-27 17:02:59+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour vos contributions,
il est recommandé de décrire ce que vous avez ajouté, pas que vous le sconnaissez :) c'est plus simple pour comprendre que ce que vous avez fait.

je pense que vous avez du avoir cours de snt jeudi, pourriez vous faire suivre ceci à votre enseignant-e svp https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/bonnes-pratiques-osm-en-snt
Bonne journée
Vincent
SekeRob (2022-03-25 09:23:54+00:00): Hi,

Per your request reviewed and correct in Change set https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118899715

ciao
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 18:08:29+00:00): Hello ManDay,

Are you sure that the surface of these roads is sand? Are there any construction works there?

Regards,
Dimitar
ManDay (2022-03-25 07:51:57+00:00): Yes, I'm sure. It's unpaved/[sandy] ground/sand. There are no construction works there.
sander79 (2022-04-01 11:10:54+00:00): hoi, volgens mij klopt je wijziging nabij Sportcentrum Oudenrijn niet helemaal.
Je hebt het fietpad uitgebreid tot het parkeerterrein maar volgens mij is het eerste gedeelte geen fietspad. (zodat de gemeente bij de opslag kan komen)

gr,
Sander
4004 (2022-03-27 00:11:15+00:00): ну я вот что то так и не понял какое смещение у этого максара
Pavelfantik (2022-03-28 16:59:38+00:00): везде разное. сложно как-то
eggie (2022-04-01 10:59:52+00:00): En hier is weer alle landuse verdwenen?
trigpoint (2022-04-29 07:22:55+00:00): What is the source of this ridiculous name, nobody calls it Whetstone as it is not in Whetstone. 

It has no verifiable name but is generally known as Leicester South of just Junction 21.
Falsernet (2022-04-29 20:16:55+00:00): https://www.roads.org.uk/motorway/m69/10 and https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=Whetstone_Interchange

A lot of junctions have arguably silly names, the Avonmouth Interchange comes to mind which is notable for not being connected to anything, as well as not being in Avonmouth. I think the only criteria really is just that its somewhere vaguely nearby and not closer to another junction.
trigpoint (2022-04-29 21:08:11+00:00): Thank you however those sites are hardly authoritative and the names appear to have been made up with no on the ground knowledge. Hardly suitable for OSM which is supposed to reflect the real world.

A junction name should as a minimum appear on a sign.

Cheers Phil
SomeoneElse (2022-12-10 19:43:31+00:00): https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=Whetstone_Interchange isn't really anything that we can use, is it?  Without any source information (e.g. to a photograph of a sign) it's just a page on the Internet that someone made up.
Jrachi (2022-03-25 08:48:23+00:00): Posso suggerire per le vostre prossime esercitazioni di urbanistica di usare un server che non sia pubblico?
Facciamo già fatica a mappare le cose che esistono e non è proprio per niente simpatico correre dietro alle cose fasulle!
Cordialmente, Ivo
Daniele Facciolini (2022-03-25 10:01:06+00:00): Buongiorno. Grazie di cuore per il messaggio. Si ha ragione. Purtroppo sono alle prime armi con Open Street Map (é la mia prima volta con questo software). Ho avuto tanta paura ad intervenire sulla Mappa di Open Street. Come esercitazione potevo anche aggiungere informazioni ad edifici già esistenti ma per non creare problemi ho pensato di intervenire su uno spazio verde con modifiche da eliminare in un secondo momento. Infatti sto procedendo alla cancellazione di tutti gli elementi (inventati) da me aggiunti. Grazie ancora! Buona giornata e Buon fine settimana!