piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:22:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90434218
TravGW (2020-09-06 00:22:20+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've reviewed your edit adding an abandoned rail line. Normally that perfectly fine however it no longer exists in any of the imagery I've checked. Here at OSM we only map what is currently on ground and not the past. Unfortunately this means I'll have to removed your edit. BUT! Fear not! These older historical edits can be made at the OpenHistoricalMap.org.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map

TL;DR
OpenStreetMap for what's currently on the ground.
OpenHistoricalMap for all the old stuff.
Mike Raust (2020-09-07 14:00:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/RussNelson has mapped all razed railways in Upstate New York and he would be mad at you if you'd delete them.
Carto'Cité (2020-09-16 13:07:11+00:00): Bonjour Cez78,
Tu as supprimé cette route et maintenant il n'y a plus de chemin (piéton ou cycliste) ici (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/48.90610/2.26859) devant la pharmacie et Le Balto. C'est curieux, tu es sûr qu'il ne reste pas un passage au moins pour les piétons et les cyclistes ? Si tu as la possibilité d'ajouter des photos ce serait super :)
Je vois qu'il y a eu des travaux donc je comprends qu'il y a eu pas mal de modifications ici.
Merci d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
4004 (2020-09-14 00:18:29+00:00): Hi, is this really necessary? seems to be just helping bad routers
SurferDude1 (2020-09-14 19:42:40+00:00): I see what you mean, and you’re probably right. I will keep this in mind going forward. Thanks!
4004 (2020-09-18 14:52:48+00:00): cheers
VictorIE (2020-11-01 17:53:26+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844411852/history#map=16/53.0977/-7.6847

The tag oneway=-1 is discouraged
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway?uselang=en-GB Could you change it to one=yes, and check the direction of travel?

Thanks
rdhma (2020-11-02 04:48:39+00:00): Changed oneway tag. Don't recall setting this, may have been previous editor.
ClickMeow (2020-09-05 19:15:22+00:00): What was the error you were trying to fix? There are four lanes at this point, but you changed the turn lane tagging to only account for three.
62847c7c2a87234e400a394bb9cd5c84ebf3c6ae (2020-09-06 00:17:47+00:00): I came across this via KeepRight issues saying 'this way is tagged "turn:lanes=left|||" where "left|||" looks like "left||".' I assumed the "|"s were to indicate empty values (as opposed to `turn:lanes=left|through|right`*). When I removed one of the "|"s, the road segment automatically changed from 3 to 4 lanes, which I assumed was to account for the turning lane as it's otherwise a 3 lane road.

*see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Turning_indications_per_lane
ClickMeow (2020-09-06 01:59:32+00:00): I can see how "left|||" can arise from a typo, which must be why KeepRight flagged it, but in this case it was correct. I changed it from empty values to explicit ones to help clear things up. I also found that the roads running north-south through that intersection had actual mistakes in them.  Thanks for helping out!
ovruni (2020-09-04 23:44:07+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que se han agregado manzanas con la etiqueta area=yes [0], sin embargo para las manzanas existe la etiqueta place=city_block [1] la cual puede utilizar en su lugar.
Si tiene cualquier consulta sobre como editar puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://telegram.me/osmPe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:area
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place%3Dcity_block
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-05 06:59:16+00:00): Thank you very much for the fix!
ozhiker2 (2020-10-09 22:51:00+00:00): No problem :-)
BeKri (2020-09-06 08:04:55+00:00): Danke !
Das ist ja schon lange zu ...
user_2066394 (2020-09-06 08:30:56+00:00): Ja, war nur kosmetische Bereinigung der disused:-Tags :-)
mueschel (2020-09-06 09:05:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
You added many tags that are not used by anybody else.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!
mariotomo (2020-09-20 23:22:30+00:00): hola.  pregunta … estabas en el área?  o cómo haces para establecer "smoothness=very_horrible"?  a veces las destapadas aquí son bad/very_bad, y si se pueden recorrer depende mucho de la temporada.  tenemos propuestas en el wiki, nos quieres ayudar con afinarlas?
Trevor_1 (2020-09-21 01:19:40+00:00): Yo no agregué "smoothness=very_horrible". Yo no estaba  fisicamente en el area; vivo en Texas. Creo que eso ya estaba en los tags, y es posible que se creó nuevo linea cuando corté la línea. Tienes un enlace para el wiki?
mariotomo (2020-09-21 01:46:31+00:00): sí, a veces pasa, que uno corta algo y luego parece que hayas sido tú a inventarte atributos inexplicables.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Panam%C3%A1/Proyectos/Nomenclatura_y_clasificaci%C3%B3n_de_carreteras
Trevor_1 (2020-09-21 02:14:42+00:00): Gracias!
literan (2020-09-05 11:20:36+00:00): только это не тоннель, а арка в доме. Правильный тег tunnel=building_passage
eggie (2020-09-05 14:08:09+00:00): Dag Alex.. Je brug zit vast aan de oever en dat is niet correct. Iets er overheen laten steken. 
Dus svp losmaken. 
Waar is het vervolg  van de brug?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90436308

MVG,
eggie
R_S (2020-09-05 16:19:39+00:00): Het klopt dat hier tegenwoordig een metalen brug staat, welke verbonden is aan een pad die uiteindelijk uitkomt op de Speelhuislaan.
Ik zal het e.e.a verbeteren en toevoegen zodat het weer klopt.
Bedankt voor de edit.
eggie (2020-09-05 16:55:00+00:00): Top.... Bedankt voor de samenwerking..
Gr eggie
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-05 07:41:32+00:00): Hi Sarah Rosita, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-05 07:41:24+00:00): Hi Sarah Rosita, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ScottWalkerAU (2020-09-05 04:01:53+00:00): Why not mark it as a private driveway instead of deleting?
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-05 13:59:47+00:00): Based on the lot boundaries on the basemap I would say it's a public road and not a private driveway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90436902
ScottWalkerAU (2020-10-15 10:23:44+00:00): I corrected this in changeset 91138761 from a survey, BTW.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90436902
Supaplex (2020-09-06 04:56:21+00:00): 請問有名稱嗎？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90437117
Facalderonm (2020-09-06 21:09:12+00:00): Cambios revertidos por no encontrarse dentro de las normas de la comunidad.
user_5359 (2020-09-08 05:35:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added a bigger number of unknown tags 
Coordenates=x1:761695,0205 y1:9814779,6864 x2:761708,3535 y2:9814768,3402 x3:761697,7822 y3:9814755,5148 x4:761684,7374 y4:9814766,4011
Ouner=Herederos Espinoza
Provincia=Chimborazo
Settlement=La Merced
Sub District=Veloz
grado de proteccion=parcial
in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:18:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90437765
Mathias_ADAV (2021-10-26 13:05:46+00:00): Bonjour Florian, je ne suis pas certain que l'allée du parking entre les deux RP Vauban soit accessible au vélo dans les deux sens. On enlève le oneway:bicycle = no ?
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:17:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90438125
user_8466505 (2020-11-05 06:56:11+00:00): I noticed you made your first contribution to OpenStreetMap. Congratulations! As of now, you can consider yourself part of the US OSM community. Your edit is live within a couple of minutes. You may have to refresh your browser to see your edit.
If you have any questions at all, we can help out. If you think you might have broken something, you’re in doubt how to map something particular, or you just want to know more about OpenStreetMap, contact us!
Here are some useful things to get you started:
* I highly recommend using the OSM [wiki-pages](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/). If you don’t find how to map something within the editor of your choice, the quickest solution is look at [Map Features](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features) on the wiki. For more complicated questions you can search in or post on the [Help-site](http://help.openstreetmap.org) or ask [the forum](http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=20). Probably the best place to ask on on OpenStreetMap US Chapter's [Slack](https://slack.openstreetmap.us/). Slack is a collaboration tool for OSM mappers, organizers, and developers. Slack even has our own #local-washington-State channel.
* [learnOSM](http://learnosm.org) is a good place to learn more about OSM. Instructions are available for using the iD browser editor and the more advanced JOSM editor. 
* Want to see who’s mapping near you, or want to see how much you’ve been doing yourself, check out the maps at [resultmaps.neis-one.org](http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/). 
* If you are a business owner and want to learn how to add OpenStreetMap to your website, check out the site [Switch2OSM](https://switch2osm.org/)
So what should you map next? I highly recommend adding features around you. Restaurants, business, streets, sidewalks, benches, basically features that you know best. You are the expert. If you find a business already mapped, make sure there is an address. There is something satisfying about filling in the map around you. Or correcting a road when the local government makes changes to it. Do you have any special interests, like biking, hiking, or even trains? Did you know we have the best bike, hiking and train world wide networks of any site. But like everything else, they can always use improvements.
Happy Mapping! 
TheAdventurer64
user_8466505 (2020-11-05 06:57:56+00:00): P.S. Thank you for adding that bus stop! We appreciate people like you adding detail to the map.
AlaskaDave (2020-09-07 05:48:22+00:00): You requested a review of this changeset. I already removed many duplicate buildings while I was reviewing another of your changesets (#90438627) so I won't repeat my comments here.
ccaputo (2020-09-07 06:00:40+00:00): It's ok, again sorry for the issues.
AlaskaDave (2020-09-07 00:24:04+00:00): This is a real mess. There are buildings placed on top of existing buildings, there are multiple buildings drawn as if they were a single building. Terrible. Why did you draw your buildings right on top of the existing ones? I see that you have done this dozens of times in this same area. What were you thinking?

All of thse of buildings were contributed by mappers who are working to help eliminate malaria. Great. But this sort of mapping will not help your cause.

I'm going through and deleting your additions but it's a big job. The Bing imagery you used is badly out of alignment so even the buildings added by your colleague (พิชัย บุญทัน) are poorly positioned. Wow, what a mess!

Please try to understand what you did and why. And please do not add any more data until you fully understand my comments.
ccaputo (2020-09-07 01:39:41+00:00): I never draw building on top of other already drawn. Also the system would not allow it, flagging an error. One time I only slightly overlapped, because buildings are very close, and the system flagged it. So I'm not sure why this issue happened. Before shouting to someone which is trying to help, you might try to advise how to improve, or maybe thinking that there could be system issues, instead of saying bullshit like "what were you thinking?".
ccaputo (2020-09-07 02:07:11+00:00): btw, I'm not sure who is this พิชัย บุญทัน. How do you assess this is my colleague?
ccaputo (2020-09-07 02:56:32+00:00): Regarding Bing imagery, this is the one suggested to be used, so I don't understand your comment about it, and you are not suggesting a solution.
AlaskaDave (2020-09-07 04:52:59+00:00): Sorry to be so direct but I have really never seen such poor technique. The buildings were present for a year before you added yours. It is inexplicable how you could have done what you did. And then, even if the buildings were somehow invisible to you, your "buildings" sometimes included shapes from several closely spaced but clearly _individual_ buildings. That's why I asked what were you thinking.

Using Bing imagery is not the problem. All imagery must be adjusted by downloading GPS traces and then moving the imagery until highways line up with those traces. After doing that, you can add objects with some confidence that they are positioned properly. 

Whether you use Bing, ESRI or Maxar imagery, it still needs to be aligned properly and the only way to do that is by using GPS traces.

Start by reading this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery

There are many other places to learn about this process but that should help.

I said พิชัย บุญทัน is your colleague because he uses the exact same hashtags as you. Even if you don't know him or her personally, I consider him your colleague.

You are a new mapper and ordinarily I am very polite to new folks but we have seen so many come along lately who do weird stuff and use bad techniques that my patience has worn thin. 

Thank you for asking that your work be checked. I'm sorry I couldn't be more accommodating.
ccaputo (2020-09-07 05:05:38+00:00): It's ok, I understand your frustration since you have to correct others. I apologize if I did wrong, and surely will put more attention. However, I'm still wondering how come I can add a building if same building is already mapped. On top of being very sure the area was unmapped, the system is not allowing to overlay buildings, so this is a bit concerning to me, because I'm not sure how can I be 100% sure I'm not overlapping and causing again the same issue. We have got a training before starting mapping, and there was no mention of the GPS tracing, I will have a look at it, thanks. Finally, regarding พิชัย บุญทัน, for sure he/she is not my colleague, of course we cannot control who uses the hashtags, so nvm. 
Thank you, have a nice day ahead.
ccaputo (2020-09-07 05:13:46+00:00): oh weird, I googled this name พิชัย บุญทัน and I found a similar one (พิชัย ใชยบุญทัน) brings to my linkedin profile. It must be some kind of auto-translation to Thai of my name?!? I never created a Thai profile, I don't even know the language, really quite weird...
AlaskaDave (2020-09-07 08:57:27+00:00): According to my Thai wife, those two names are probably the same man using two different forms of his name. Can't be sure.

I agree with you that something is wrong with a system — I have never been able to add a building over the top of another one. One way that could happen is if you are working from some sort of a "task manager" that allocates work spaces for different mappers and it didn't work as intended. A good task manager will make sure to not allocate the same area to two different mappers. Are you using a task manager?

I have a couple more questions:
What is the full name of the project you're working for? Are you getting paid for your work?

Thanks for your willingness to work together.
ccaputo (2020-09-07 09:42:46+00:00): Hi, yes I'm using this tasking manager https://tasks.hotosm.org/
ccaputo (2020-09-07 09:48:15+00:00): No, I'm not getting paid. Our Company supports charity activities, and we all try our best to contribute. Unfortunately, with the COVID situation, most activities on the field in Singapore are not practical because of the social distancing we still have to adhere to. This mapping activities is a way to still contribute somehow. And I really apologize if my activity is causing more troubles than any help. This is surely not my intention. I will use the advice you are providing, hope will improve.
ccaputo (2020-09-07 09:57:45+00:00): I know that one time, the system was hanging once I saved the task. At the end it did not save any of the mapping I've done. So I've to redo again. Now I suspect somehow it indeed saved 2 times, maybe it kept the saving job in the background. That is the only explanation I have. With this in mind, if this hanging issue happens again, I will not proceed to re-do the mapping, even if I get a clear map. Maybe I will just wait one day and see if the system just delayed the saving.
AlaskaDave (2020-09-07 10:46:02+00:00): Okay, Carlo. Thanks for the information. I suggested JOSM because of its power but unless you want to become a regular contributor it might not be worth the time it takes to learn how to use it. 

No problem about the extra work. I'm glad you want to contribute time to worthwhile projects and I'm happy you are willing to work on improving your technique.

Returning to the duplicate buildings - yep, it was probably some sort of error in the HOT task manager. Sometimes there are synchronization issues between two users working in the same area or even two versions of editing by the same user, that cause "conflicts" upon uploading. These are very difficult to resolve and most OSMers dread them. It looks like that's what happened here. 

Dave
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:17:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90438955
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-12-01 23:30:02+00:00): no parece residencial, me mudé a la "track": https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844457494
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-12-01 23:32:52+00:00): no parece existir: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844457616
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:17:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90439496
literan (2020-09-05 11:17:30+00:00): не надо писать в поле name описания объектов. Оно только для имен собственных https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
GITNE (2020-09-10 11:10:39+00:00): I am a bit confused why the `addr:housenumber` changed. Additionally, the phone number you have added does not feature Portland's area code prefix of 503. Lastly, please use ITU's phone number formatting (see the Wiki) when adding phone numbers to OSM. Could you please explain?
GITNE (2020-09-10 12:21:36+00:00): Oh, do not bother. I have reviewed it more thoroughly. The building has multiple addresses, so I have added one which is visible in the Mapillary imagery.

I not sure about the phone number because the rule of thumb is that land line phone numbers should correlate with the geographical location. So, I just left it as is.
tguen (2020-09-11 07:56:59+00:00): I've reverted your removal of the address from the building. This from is RLIS data on oregonmetro.gov. Just because there are multiple addresses for the building does not mean that there is not a primary address that belongs on the building itself. The others are secondary addresses for commercial spaces on the first floor. Please wait for a response before making such edits.

The phone number is correct, as you can see if you click the link to the building's website. 971 has been a Portland area code for many years. The wiki says NANP format is fine as long as it includes the country code.

Please do answer the questions I asked in our first discussion.
GITNE (2020-09-11 11:35:34+00:00): > This from is RLIS data on oregonmetro.gov.

It is okay to source or import data from other databases or registries as long as the data is adapted or transformed to the OSM-way of doing things. Please note also that OSM collects data based on the facts on the ground, not according to any legal or other third party registries. Official sources are not authoritative for OSM but only the factual situation at the location. So, please be careful not to simply copying from other sources even if they are official. Despite the fact that OSM does not model primary or secondary addresses—address precedence in that sense—there is nothing which would suggest that the building (or actually compound of buildings) has a primary address. Anyhow, I think that in this case it is okay to have the building outline tagged with an address.

> 971 has been a Portland area code for many years.

I did not know that, so I left it as is. So, according to Wikipedia sources 971 has only been introduced since July 1st, 1999. Well, I guess I always learn something new.
NANP is a national standard. Indeed, few other countries have also adopted NANP as a national standard. Yet, this and the fact that NANP complies in the number plan aspect with ITU does not make NANP an international standard. AFAIK, it is not an ITU standard, nor a subset of any ITU standard either. OSM does not follow national standards for good reason. So naturally, OSM prefers international standards, including the ITU standard for phone number formatting. The main reason why OSM tolerates NANP formatted phone numbers is because everybody can commit to OSM, even unaware newcomers who just do know any better and adhere in good faith to their national standard, and because of the shear count of phone numbers already collected in OSM. Nevertheless, for newly added phone numbers the ITU formatting is preferred.
GITNE (2020-09-11 13:33:54+00:00): Please let me elaborate more on the address issue, or mapping addresses from official address registries. While official address entries may exist in official records they may not “exist” in the real world. OSM's mission is to map, or more specifically model, the existing perceivable world. If a building has multiple addresses but only one or few are perceivable (mostly visible) on the ground then only these addresses should be mapped. I am not aware of any tag which could denote that an address is a synonymous or secondary address. OSM does not map or collect addresses for the post office. Post offices are governed by separate rules and regulations. For example, some entities (usually with large volumes of mail) are addressable exclusively or inclusively by a specific ZIP code. This kind of addresses should not be mapped, unless this is what a building or piece of land is signed with.