piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MxxCon (2022-06-09 07:00:08+00:00): You didn't add that data from from that website. You took it from another copyrighted source and as such it will be deleted.
Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?
If you continue to add copyrighted data, your account will be referred to DWG.
SteveM9191 (2022-06-09 07:04:55+00:00): So why the data source field (when adding data) is not mandatory? Why this link is not linked there? It is also an usability problem. Thanks for clarification and bye.
MxxCon (2022-06-09 02:11:13+00:00): Hello uplander.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122131599
SteveM9191 (2022-06-09 06:31:13+00:00): Friend of me gave me a flyer of this restaurant.
MxxCon (2022-06-09 06:48:43+00:00): Considering you map for upland, and considering in the past virtually every single edit from upland-related people have been either straight up vandalism or taking copyrighted data, I find it hard to believe that you have a flyer to a local biz, while not being local to NYC. Would you mind showing that flyer?
SteveM9191 (2022-06-09 07:09:55+00:00): Shall I delete all my entries?
MxxCon (2022-06-09 07:13:32+00:00): If they were originated from copyrighted sources, yes.
user_5359 (2022-06-09 07:12:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thank you for adding the BUILDING G4 Collosion Center. Please notice you didn't add any information about the business.
MxxCon (2022-06-09 02:11:18+00:00): Hello uplander.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122131660
SteveM9191 (2022-06-09 06:31:49+00:00): Friend of me told me that he was there and gave me the data.
MxxCon (2022-06-09 06:52:38+00:00): Considering you map for upland, and considering in the past virtually every single edit from upland-related people have been either straight up vandalism or taking copyrighted data, I find it hard to believe that you have a friend that was there.
SteveM9191 (2022-06-09 07:01:55+00:00): So please explain me shortly (or link a source) how osm community is adding data to the map. It seems that just owner of objects, mapping when walking around and osm itself are allowed sources. There are many discussions in the internet (forums, etc.) what is allowed and what is not allowed (even by osm moderators).
MxxCon (2022-06-09 07:09:36+00:00): In addition to what you mentioned, there are also sources that have compatible licenses with OSM and they can be used for mapping. 
You can also take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_OpenStreetMap? And numerous other articles on copyright on OSM's wiki.
Buraddo (2022-06-24 06:49:33+00:00): How come this is not Piața I.I.C Brătianu if there is a streetname sign on-site and the addresses of the buildings are on Piața I.I.C Brătianu? Just by searching online the addresses of Brătianu Real Estate and of the Lutheran church you can find that they are no. 1 and 3 on Piața IIC Brătianu
Are we even allowed to copy from http://www.harti-orase.ro/ ? I doubt...
VLD518 (2022-07-06 08:13:57+00:00): Thanks for pointing out and providing the street name map! I will update it back to the previous version
tyfi (2023-11-27 00:32:48+00:00): Hi, my name is Tyler.

I see you've been abbreviating a lot of road names in your edits on OSM. One of the most important conventions we have is to use fully-expanded names. This is because abbreviations are ambiguous, so it's easier for software to abbreviate stuff with a lookup table than it is to un-abbreviate stuff at render time.

So instead of N, E, S, and W, we spell out "North", "East", "South", and "West". And "Blvd" should actually be "Boulevard".

This is done deliberately, and we must not undo this. (Sometimes the actual name of a thing looks abbreviated, but that is a rare exception).

Please see this wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Abbreviations

Have a good day!
Dodko (2022-07-10 08:51:44+00:00): Adresu som opravil.
Ak sa dáva addr:streetnumber musí byť aj ulica a nesmie byť addr:place ale mestská časť sa dá do addr:suburb
GUFSZ (2023-04-06 14:17:15+00:00): Wie kommst Du auf die Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068000282#map=19/50.11921/8.68641&layers=N
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068000282#map=19/50.11921/8.68641&layers=N

Dort gibt es keine Gebäude. Ich war gerade da. Und warum hast Du die Gebäude gnadenlos in den Spielplatz reingestellt?
GUFSZ (2023-04-10 13:34:18+00:00): Du hast seit meiner Frage schon einige Male wieder gemappt. Es wäre schön, wenn Du antworten würdest.
seattlefyi (2022-06-08 21:28:42+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit, glad to see it! Just a quick note that the Street Name should be just “Rainier Avenue South” in this case, and the Building Number (as OsmAnd refers it) should be “5710”. So the number and street info are completely separate, with no abbreviations. That’s  a great start!
seattlefyi (2022-06-08 21:28:57+00:00): Also, I don’t think you can add city, state, country or zip code in the app without going into advanced mode and adding the specific tags. If you need help, please let me know! Thanks again.
seattlefyi (2022-06-16 00:25:37+00:00): Hope you don't mind, since it was easier to do this way, I went ahead and merged your additions into the node which was already there, and fixed the address tags -- all in the live data. Should be reflected in a future data update to OsmAnd, if that's how you prefer to edit.
bxl-forever (2023-01-13 17:12:57+00:00): Hello,

I would like to react to the changeset description here.  It is not correct to state that an option does not exist… in OpenStreetMap.  It just doesn’t exist in the editing software you are using.  Every piece of software provides a list of options but choosing another value is always possible.  

surface=bark has 313 occurrences in the OSM database so far.  It surely does exist.  However, we recommend using surface=woodchips instead, this tag is understood by most apps.  Sometimes we have to simplify some choices to reduce tag fragmentation, since OSM is a large ecosystem with plenty of apps using our data.

Have a nice day.
Johnwhelan (2022-08-30 12:43:48+00:00): You'veused highway=service alley=service on a highway connecting two settlements rather than highway=unclassified that I might expect according to the African highway wiki.  Any special reason for the tags?
MxxCon (2022-06-09 02:13:02+00:00): Hello.
This terminal is already mapped as relation/3778271
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122135772
PasqualeD (2022-06-09 08:03:59+00:00): Hello! Of course you are right but I read this post on Instagram and I updated the map. 
Here is the Link: https://www.instagram.com/p/Ceibmvaj2B-/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
user_10714872 (2022-06-11 06:56:58+00:00): 大佬牛逼
mariotomo (2022-06-08 22:13:00+00:00): hola. gracias por apoyar OSM y gracias por pedir revisión (review-requested). te tengo una pregunta, quizás no entendí: mencionaste que entre los dos carriles de la transístmica hay una división en concreto?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122135814
mariotomo (2022-06-08 23:26:19+00:00): p.s.: gracias por comentar el conjunto de cambios, facilita mucho la revisión!
Leo Slager (2022-06-19 23:04:54+00:00): Eénrichtingsverkeer op de Tolhuisweg stond in de verkeerde richting.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3232003
VictorIE (2022-06-10 04:26:21+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14232109

This polygon is touching itself here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9804753351 It would be better as a multipolygon or as multiple areas, each representing a field.
mueschel (2022-06-20 19:51:56+00:00): Hi
could you check this node? It got a 'uic-name' and a 'uic_name' tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2483323431
Kevin Kofler (2022-09-06 01:03:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125835114.
Kevin Kofler (2022-09-06 01:08:47+00:00): Rereverted as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125835145 because the above revert was partial and broken.

I'm reverting it manually now because the revert scripts are all useless.
Kevin Kofler (2022-09-06 01:31:05+00:00): Should be fixed by: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125835390
rainerU (2023-03-31 17:51:40+00:00): Bonjour,

Avec ce CS, tu as ajouté bicycle=designated aux chemins qui sont prévue pour faire parti de la future liaison Es Têt entre St.Estève et la D16a au sud-est de Pézilla. A mon avis, cela ne correspond pas à la réalité sur le terrain. Cela fait par exemple que sur Géovélo ces chemins sont présentés comme des pistes cyclables, voir cette note : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3606688

Rainer
rainerU (2023-03-31 17:58:12+00:00): Ce sont les chemins en question :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/695553055

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068017594

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196264180
LySioS (2023-03-31 18:29:07+00:00): Ah oui en effet, j'ai dû mal comprendre la communication de PMM à l'époque, en me disant que c'était aménagé.
 On les bascule en proposed=cycleway ?
rainerU (2023-04-01 06:24:13+00:00): ok
user_2066394 (2022-06-15 11:49:14+00:00): Auf welchen Laden beziehen sich die Öffnungszeiten? Sind beide Läden im gleichen Raum?
rnhodek (2022-06-15 13:15:15+00:00): Die beiden sind nicht im gleichen Raum, sondern nebeneinander im gleichen Haus. Beim Verschieben des Nodes sind beide aufeinander gelandet und waren nicht mehr zu trennen... dass sich die Metadaten dabei vermischen war mir nicht bewusst, sorry.

Die Öffnungszeiten sind vom Optiker, der Rest der Metadaten eher von der Eisdiele. 

Ich versuche das mal zu korrigieren...
user_2066394 (2022-06-15 13:28:14+00:00): Ok. Im iD-Editot hast du oben links die Pfeiltaste "Rückgängig", damit kann man Änderungen sukzessive rückgängig machen, wenn sich mal ein Fehler einschleichen sollte.
user_2066394 (2022-06-15 13:28:45+00:00): (Das andere Links)
rnhodek (2022-06-15 13:55:24+00:00): Egal welches Links -- ich hatte es nicht als Fehler gesehen, weil ja beide im gleichen Haus sind und gleiche Adresse haben. Ich dachte auch, dass anscheinend nur ein Node in einem Haus geht und hab's stehenlassen. An die restlichen Metadaten hatte ich nicht gedacht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-07 09:38:14+00:00): Hello!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9804812307

shop=iparcikk ? What is the meaning of that shop value? What kind of services or products are sold here? Is anything from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop fitting? Maybe new value needs to be invented? Maybe this data is wrong and there is no shop here? Maybe it is not a shop but something else?
DNL852 (2024-04-29 10:06:59+00:00): Ahoj,
stanice Nextbike (nebo Rekola) by měly být mapovány jako samostatný objekt pouze tehdy, pokud se jedná výhradně o stojan společnosti (značený přímo na místě, většinou zamykatelný). V Brně provozovatelé nejčastěji používají městské stojany, které jsou už zmapované. Jedná se tak o duplicitu. Viz: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_rental#Types_of_bicycles_and_accessories
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-17 23:00:03+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3403577 ? Chyba tam ograniczenia dostępu brak
Jrachi (2022-06-09 19:10:34+00:00): Ciao.
Il source si indica sul changeset non sulle way
map-improver-42 (2022-06-09 21:35:23+00:00): Changeset values are automatically generated. Source is personal survey.
Jrachi (2022-06-10 06:21:25+00:00): Thank you.
I'll take care of deleting the source tag from the ways.
LockOnGuy (2022-06-09 00:47:27+00:00): Wrong, deleting the name:ar is kinda vandalism because the name indeed reflects the correct name,        
The Arabic name for the town is "القصبة" this is what the Arabs call it, Some Arabs call it "قصبة الفیحاء" like to glorify it, etc.       
The northern part of the town is called "قصبة النصار", the southern part of the town is called "قصبة المعمرة" and all the town is called "القصبة" according to the local Arabs in this town and the Arabs in all Ahwaz region, also in nearby Iraq who speaks Arabic too.         
     
This changeset was reverted in changeset 122139761 where the changeset comment is "revert changeset 122137149, restore the name:ar tag"       
Regards.
VLD557 (2022-06-13 11:36:09+00:00): According to Wki, we can use both أروندكنار and القصبة after it (ex: أروندكنار-القصبة) just facilitate it to all users.
VLD557 (2022-06-13 13:19:36+00:00): Hi LockOnGuy,
Thank you for pointing it out and making the correction! I should have not deleted the tag name:ar. I really appreciate you share more local knowledge about the city name. I wonder if we can use both أروندكنار and القصبة after it (ex: أروندكنار-القصبة) just facilitate it to all users.
Kindest Regards
LockOnGuy (2022-06-13 14:33:15+00:00): Yes and that would be:  
alt_name:ar= أروندكنار   
Regards.
user_2066394 (2022-06-09 12:55:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068027150
Hier fehlen noch Tags.

Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude etc. orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
ottwiz (2022-06-08 21:51:55+00:00): I should've mentioned Esri World Imagery (non-clarity), but I forgot to put there. Most of the work was done from NAIP and Bing
Hevał (2022-07-30 13:07:56+00:00): @VLD557 it’s the other way around my g this is a Kurdish village + it should end with a “ة” in Arabic, you don’t even know your own language my dude!
VLD557 (2022-08-16 10:35:14+00:00): Thanks for pointing out the features is a Kurdish village. I appreciate the updates as well.
gscscnd (2022-06-09 07:36:04+00:00): Ewentualnie ustawić building=supermarket (jeśli jest to zgodne z rzeczywistością) i usunąć tagi opening_hours i shop.
irik (2022-06-09 08:54:17+00:00): Tak ustawiłem, dzięki!
mariotomo (2022-06-08 23:29:18+00:00): pregunta … si está en contacto con la empresa que realiza esta urbanización, podría obtener el plan (a lo mejor georeferenciado) de todos los edificios?  y será que están numerados?  el editor off-line JOSM debería poder leer un archivo en formato razonable.
clay_c (2022-06-08 22:38:59+00:00): oops, changeset comment was supposed to say Arizona county roads
MikeN (2022-06-09 02:06:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  The default imagery (Bing) usually has an offset from the true GPS position.   Check the background settings - usually the ESRI Imagery or ESRI Clarity layers have best alignment.   Also, the building location should be aligned to the base of a building and not the roof.  You can draw to the roof outline, then move it to match the base if the image was taken from an angle.   So for the water tower, the circle should go around the legs and not the tank offset.
BubbleGuppies (2022-06-10 05:50:07+00:00): Greetings! 
The tag amenity=hotel is deprecated and no longer used. Please use the tag tourism=hotel, thanks!!
evgenykatyshev (2022-06-10 11:06:51+00:00): Thank you to told me, I didn't know.
tastrax (2022-06-20 04:46:47+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Warin61 (2022-08-31 02:53:10+00:00): Hi,
The Relation: Munda Biddi Trail (5810814) looks to have some alternative bits - I have given them that role and they are towards the bottom of the listed ways. See what you think...
steerage250 (2022-08-31 08:23:55+00:00): I'm sorry.  I have pondered your message and am not sure what you mean.  Did I add some stuff to the Munda Biddi Trail relation when I should have been adding it to Munda Biddi Alternate ? - and you've moved them into Munda Biddi Alternate ?
regards
Ian
Warin61 (2022-09-01 08:19:07+00:00): Sorry .. I'll try for less gibberish. :) 

I have edited the Relation: Munda Biddi Trail (5810814)  to make it contiguous. I have moved those ways that are not part of the contiguous sequence to the bottom of the relation and added roles that reflect what I think they are. Possibly they should be in the 'Munda Biddi Alternate Relation' ... 

Is that somewhat clearer? Note I am not local nor have I walked the trail as yet .. possibly next year, fingers crossed.
steerage250 (2022-09-01 09:31:21+00:00): Yes, I understand.  (I hope you haven't walked it as it is a mountain bike track :-) )
I can see a bunch of miscellaneous items like buildings etc down the bottom.  Roughly how many items are we talking about that you moved? half-a-dozen? 50?
Were your changes related to the changes I made? - or just a general cleanup-type change?
Warin61 (2022-09-02 07:20:56+00:00): I reordered them so as to make the trail continuous and in-sequence. This makes it much easier to spot gaps and 'fix' them. 

I have not moved anything out of the relation .. unless it conflicted with the route. There was one bit that uses the bibb track but had a short cycle path off to the side, could have removed the bibb track and included a short section of road there .. but well simpler. 
I think the alternatives ( I placed the role 'alternative' on them IIRC) could be moved to the 'alternatives' relation. As for the buildings (shelters) and campsites .. they presently have no formal place in the OSM relation.. not that OSM cannot change ... but I see no one thinking of it. 

I'm thinking of walking the bibb track .. and as I was making alterations to it and they both use the same bits occasionally I anted to make certain I did not accidentally destroy the bike relation.
steerage250 (2022-09-02 08:38:04+00:00): You've put it all in sequence! Fantastic - I have been wanting to do that for ages.  I have tackled bits-at-a-time, but never tackled the whole lot.  I presume it was a purely manual exercise? Do you use JOSM?

OK, I think I understand:
- your changes were not really about my last changeset, just a general cleanup and you contacted me because Iwork on the relation a bit - correct?
- You've tagged a lot of ways you're suggesting could go into Munda Biddi Alternate, but have left them in Munda Biddi - but just down the bottom.
- You're not ure what to with a few random bits and pieces - also down the bottom.

thanks for your work

Ian
Warin61 (2022-09-02 10:00:40+00:00): JOSM user here. Makes things like the India Pacific train route much easier!  JOSM will automate putting them in order .. then I go through looking at the gaps and filling those in - in this case short sections only, and then redoing the auto sequence, check for gaps .. untill you can get from end to end without gaps .. fairly quick process when the gaps are small. Much harder when gaps are large and there is more than one possible path. 

Yes, you look to be more acquainted with it than me, so any errors, by me or others, might get picked up by you.. I hope!
steerage250 (2022-09-02 10:44:52+00:00): Oh right - how do you get JOSM to do that? (I only operate on the top 2% of JOSM capabilties I'm sure)
Warin61 (2022-09-02 12:08:51+00:00): I operate on a very narrow 1%. 

Right side bar . relations - select a relation, then at the bottom of that relation window there is an edit button click that - opens a window for the relation .. on the left of that there are a number of buttons .. you want the arrow with the red bubbles beside it .. click on either the up of down arrow and it will sort the way/s you have highlighted. Play with it.. I think I have the descriptions right ... just don't save untill your happy with the result. Or quite without saving. A newer version of JOSN has a rotate function .. I'm keen to see if that does what I want ..
steerage250 (2022-09-02 13:36:28+00:00): thanks, I use the JOSM relations editor, but hadn't tried that button.
I'll get onto your odds & sods.
Thanks again
Ian
Warin61 (2022-09-03 06:26:12+00:00): Don't be afraid of trying things out. 'Control Z' will undo most things. You can also 'save' (upper right tab 'File' then 'save) the work locally to your drive so you don't loose stuff before you try something out... To get back what you saved - upper right 'file' tab 'Open Recent' and select the file name you used.
steerage250 (2022-09-03 09:06:22+00:00): local save & restore - another thing I've learnt!
thanks
Ian
joost schouppe (2023-05-02 12:39:16+00:00): Vergeet de snelheid niet aan te passen als je een fietsstraat doorvoert :)
Ik heb het nu gefixed.
Thierry1030 (2023-05-02 12:50:27+00:00): Ik had de snelheid juist gemapt, maar ene KingCharles5 heeft dat om bizarre reden aangepast ...
joost schouppe (2023-05-02 16:05:34+00:00): Ha whoops, verkeerd gezien, sorry!
steerage250 (2022-06-09 00:05:54+00:00): Update Munda Biddi for the Larego mine realignment
Das Beetle (2022-06-09 00:26:04+00:00): Since the changeset didn't allow the full comment to be displayed, I wrote:

"But there are parking lots on either side that requires a pass/permit"

This is based on surveying the area in person. There is a sign that was posted warning that permits are required.
olo81 (2022-06-09 04:12:39+00:00): Kino było wiele lat temu. Tagowanie tego budynku amenity=cinema wprowadza w błąd. Do poprawy. 
Aż strach zerkać na twoje edycje, same babole
maraf24 (2022-06-09 19:58:41+00:00): Nieczynne kino nie jest kinem. Tak jak zamknięty sklep nie jest już sklepem.
A taka nazwa to nie nazwa a opis.
canfe (2022-06-09 04:42:55+00:00): Hai disegnato questa rotatoria way 1068067989 ma non l'hai messa come roundabout e in più con nome che di solito non hanno. Sei sicuro?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122139981
LockOnGuy (2022-06-09 01:13:51+00:00): source=https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/القصبة_(الأحواز)
MxxCon (2022-06-09 02:21:12+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122140157
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
BC4FUN (2022-06-11 19:43:38+00:00): Existing business reviews and websites.  It looks like tag was reverted.  I appologize for any confusion. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122140157
BC4FUN (2022-06-11 19:46:12+00:00): I am new to Openmaps but it appears that you are reverting all of my tags.  This sseems like a malicious and personal attck.  We map for the greater good of all members and umap users.  I would encourage you to confirm or deny mapped locations accurately.  Thank You!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122140157
MxxCon (2022-06-09 02:27:17+00:00): Hello uplander.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122140252
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 12:50:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122248058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some data from dubious sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 .
felipeeugenio (2022-06-09 16:23:57+00:00): Hola. Me da la idea de que es el hoyo 1 ese.
Daniel Bräuning (2022-06-09 16:51:33+00:00): ese es el hoyo 10 de Santa Martina y se llama LA ROCA
felipeeugenio (2022-06-09 17:07:59+00:00): ok. pero el 11 donde esta? si fuera tan amable por favor de revisar el resto. Porque un poco mas al norte hay otro 10.
saludos
canfe (2022-06-09 04:50:11+00:00): Se scrivi aggiornamento cosa si capisce?
Detto ciò non sono d'accordo che Grange Basolo sia un quartiere.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122140308
MxxCon (2022-06-09 02:27:42+00:00): Hello uplander.
What is the source of this data?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122140324
SHARCRASH (2022-06-09 09:32:50+00:00): Hi! Please be careful https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/561305338/history