piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2021-03-23 12:16:40+00:00): I think 土地公浜 is kot the correct name, for stram in the lountain area, it should use 溝
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101546246
mtbmatysek (2021-03-23 15:08:03+00:00): @Supaplex: Thanks, fixed....
tungstentt (2021-04-06 14:17:35+00:00): Hello Hitesh_J,
ist it correct that the border between UAE an Oman has been changed?
Greetings tungstentt
mariotomo (2021-03-23 21:27:07+00:00): hi gscholz! what was the problem and what was the fix? can you help us in Panama identify or prevent similar mistakes in the future?
gscholz (2021-03-24 05:36:25+00:00): Hi mariotomo,
thanks for your request. The errors were wrongly used relations. Those are not collections.

You can defintively help avoiding and removing those kind of errors or even better errors of all kinds by using quality assurance tools on a regular base:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance

I personally use OSM Inspector (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/) with following views more or less daily to review south and central america:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-64.29492&lat=2.10231&zoom=4&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-79.42859&lat=7.82964&zoom=8

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-80.26355&lat=8.63425&zoom=8

Thanks a lot for your engagement if you like to join me.
Guido
mariotomo (2021-07-09 22:34:12+00:00): Hi Guido, I've been using geofabrik to review/correct route relations.  can you help me on a curious issue?  "hail_and_ride", that's an admissible role, isn't it? (https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=-80.32343&lat=8.55453&zoom=13&overlays=ptv2_routes_,ptv2_routes_valid,ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes)
gscholz (2021-07-10 05:09:32+00:00): Hi Mario,
there is a proposal for hail_and_ride in the wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/hail_and_ride

So it seems to be official but JOSM does not support it and OSMI doesn't know it as well.
Guido
rthik007 (2021-04-01 03:12:24+00:00): Hi Nonoy Pablo , Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential roads way 23522066,way 23520114,way 23520542. Kindly refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102086283.. Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101547700
abakus_uploader (2021-03-23 23:30:56+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
alexashh (2021-03-25 10:10:31+00:00): Добрый день! Пожалуйста объясните что вы хотели добавить этой правкой. 

Объект-точка, но с именем "Доскинские дачи" и тегами для объекта-полигона, и на территории Нижегородского кремля. В каком-то месте произошла ошибка
literan (2021-03-23 16:18:06+00:00): по area:highway=service - если есть "ребра дорог площади", то следует использовать тег area:highway=service

если "ребер роутинга" нет (т.е. лень их рисовать, и только заливаете площадку) - то используют highway=** + area=yes. Но корректного роутинга в этом случае ждать не стоит (по площадям навигаторы водить не умеют)
literan (2021-03-23 16:18:40+00:00): пардон, не скопировалось, это по этому полигону https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921191620#map=17/55.78677/37.67090
solenoid jam (2021-03-24 17:49:32+00:00): Немного эзотерично, но попробую применять. 
Это где то в вики разжёвано?
literan (2021-03-24 18:29:55+00:00): где-то в вики было (а иначе откуда я это почерпнул?), найти не смог
limes11 (2021-03-23 08:25:47+00:00): Hallo,

ich musste das leider revertieren. Du hattest die Straße wohl versehentlich aufgeteilt und dabei die Geometrie verletzt. Passiert beim ersten Mal. Ich kümmere mich heute Abend um die Tempolimits. 

Schöne Grüße, 

Limes
Euskirchener (2021-03-23 09:40:32+00:00): Kein To-do mehr. Ich habe die Fehler korrigiert.
limes11 (2021-03-23 17:02:31+00:00): danke!
Ecky99 (2021-03-23 19:56:00+00:00): Ich bin neu hier und danke euch für Unterstützung
habi (2021-03-23 09:56:54+00:00): Ciao  Zocky17

Welcome to OpenStreetMap, great to have you here.

You've changed the road to the cable car (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/473053452/, strangely only named 's') to a driveway, which is generally only used to lead to a property: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway

Additionally, you marked it as `covered=yes` which is only to be used if an object is under another object, e.g. a roof or so.

Marking `surface=asphalt' would have been enough to tell that this road is good for biking.
I took the liberty to correct this and am happy to continue the discussion with you (also in German :) ).

Greetings from Bern,
habi
Zocky17 (2021-03-23 10:02:30+00:00): Hi

Thank you for your feedback! Was the first time, so i'am very sorry for the mistake I have done. Will take care for future corrections.

Regards, Olivier
habi (2021-03-23 10:04:55+00:00): No worries, we're all here to make the map better!

Me personally especially for bike stuff :)
habi (2021-03-23 10:18:11+00:00): And just so you know for future changes: You can request a review (like you did with this change, that’s why I’m here), then there’s a higher chance that someone else looks at it.
Kseniya_Nekrasava (2021-03-31 07:58:36+00:00): Hi! Sorry, but you added a lot of drag nodes to the map with your changes. Be more careful in next time!)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101554204
RabiIsland (2021-04-01 05:05:19+00:00): Hi Kseniya_Nekrasava, thank you for alerting me to this! I’ve made the appropriate fixes to the data, thanks again!
APneunzehn74 (2023-12-28 21:18:07+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier vor drei Jahren den "Plattenwege" angelegt. Kann es sein sein daß es sich hierbei um diesen Weg aus dem Wiki Artikel handelt? https://www.niederbayern-wiki.de/wiki/F%C3%BCrstensteig
Falls es sich um diesen Weg handelt, der wurde aktuell sogar unter Denkmal Schutz gestellt. https://www.pnp.de/lokales/stadt-und-landkreis-passau/neue-bauten-in-denkmalliste-fuerstensteig-bei-untergriesbach-mit-dabei-15105518
Ggf sollte der Name angepasst werden.
Grüße Andreas
Supaplex (2021-03-23 12:05:16+00:00): 其實店家有地址，另外有地址點也無妨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101554353
catdreamer (2021-03-23 12:14:11+00:00): 要這樣嗎?本來我們還想說可以用地址點位直接修改添加poi
DK7080BE (2021-03-23 13:35:31+00:00): De to tynde veje til nr. 19 og 23 er defineret som indkørsler (driveways). Indkørsler/adgangsvej er ikke offentlige veje. -- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Tag:service%3Ddriveway
osmviborg (2021-03-23 14:31:03+00:00): Er der skiltet med "Privat vej"? Hvordan kommer postbuddet frem?
Charl8C (2021-03-24 06:15:41+00:00): Jeg kan desværre ikke svare. Det er en ældre herre, som har givet mig informationen, da 'folk' kører ind på hans ejendom. Han har henvendt sig til os (Krak) og kan ikke selv rette det, han ikke har PC
DK7080BE (2021-03-24 15:17:45+00:00): Jeg har forkortet indkørslerne til Bredstrup Markvej 19 og 23, fjernet vejnavnene og sat uvedkommende kørsel (access=destination) på dem
DK7080BE (2021-03-24 15:20:42+00:00): Jeg har sat "uvedkommende kørsel frabedes" (access=destination) på indkørslen
Charl8C (2021-03-25 05:52:52+00:00): Tak for jeres hjælp
eggie (2021-03-23 08:21:32+00:00): Volgens de wiki kan het wel, maar het is niet gebruikelijk.
We taggen barrie=gate op een node vebonden met de weg. . Dan heeft het effect.
eggie (2021-03-23 08:25:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate#On_a_way

Je kunt de barrier =gate ook opnemen in een barrier=fence
Abokhorst (2021-03-23 08:52:14+00:00): Ik begrijp niet precies hoe het nu moet.
eggie (2021-03-23 09:00:47+00:00): Hier een voorbeeld van een hek op een node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.87301/5.74891
Wanneer er echt een hek omheen loopt kun je dat rondom als barrie=fence intekenen.
Dan maakt de 'gate' weer onderdeel uit van de 'fence" en moet verbonden zijn met de weg.
Probeer maar. Het is een doodlopen stukje dus het heeft verder geen functie in de routering.
Je eigen manier is niet eens fout, maar wel ongebruikelijk. 
In het begin kijken ervaren mappers wel mee..  uiteraard om te helpen.
Laat je niet weerhouden door kritiek. 
Succes,
eggie
eggie (2021-03-23 14:13:33+00:00): Even als voorbeeld aangepast
Met fence en gate
Rendering duurt even.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-03-23 08:19:46+00:00): Oke.. dus de uitzonderingen voor tweewielers kunnen ook weg. 
Gewoon de regels verwijderen voor bicycle en moped.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-03-23 08:18:29+00:00): Dag Abokhorst.. OSM zit vol met kleine addertje.
Geen oneway meer hier... Dus kan de uitzondering op oneway =yes voor tweewielers ook weg 
Dus  verwijderen
oneway:bicycle=no  en voor m oped ook.

MVG
eggie
felipeeugenio (2021-03-23 12:15:45+00:00): Hello.
Are you sure this is a road and not a buried pipeline from Pelambres mining complex? When I added this I wasn´t sure.
regards
borovac (2021-03-23 14:04:28+00:00): Hi,

I’ve seen that there was a way, that was untagged. On Maxar Premium Imagery I’ve noticed several cars moving along this road (e.g. -31.8975969, -70.6884636 ) and also I’ve seen this road intersecting with several roads. I was not sure whether this was a service road used for pipeline maintenance, but since I’ve seen the cars, I decided to map it as unclassified.

The northern part of the way that leads to the mine has access=private so I decided not to add the upper section.

Segments of this way are used by cars, but it also looks like a pipeline. If you think that it would be better to tag this as a pipeline, I can change the tags, so not to confuse other mappers.

Thanks,
borovac
felipeeugenio (2021-03-23 17:33:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for your quick response. I made some research in internet, and it seems to be a pipeline.

maybe there is a side road for maintenance. in that case this should be tagged as service and access=no.
felipeeugenio (2021-03-23 17:37:07+00:00): actually, you can see the pipeline emerging from the hill on the western part. This is a common thing in Chile. there is a lot of mines here.
borovac (2021-03-24 07:51:30+00:00): Hi again, 
 
Thanks for all the additional research you made!
I also did some research and decided to convert your prior geometry to pipeline, instead of highway. I've added additional ways as service roads in segments (-31.8960038, -70.6818643; -31.8944742, -70.6756714) where cars are visible. I've added barriers in places where they seem like they exist to restrict access. 
 
Thanks again,
borovac
felipeeugenio (2021-03-24 19:04:36+00:00): Thanks to you. Good work.
regards
Jakka (2021-04-10 08:08:33+00:00): Door paden te verwijderen is er geen garantie dat die ooit er terug inkomen ....
Shaun das Schaf (2021-03-23 14:58:34+00:00): Hallo Powerfuzzy,

deiner Quellenangabe entnehme ich, dass du nicht vor Ort warst und auch keine Luftbilder für deine Änderungen verwendet hast?
Maps4BW als einzige Quelle für Änderungen zu nutzen ist eine SEHR schlechte Idee, da es oft gewaltige Abweichungen zur Realität gibt.

Höchstwahrscheinlich hast du also die Genauigkeit einiger Wege eher verschlechtert als verbessert.

Maps4BW sollte nur verwendet werden, um einen ungefähren Verlauf des Weges zu erkennen. Das stumpfe Abpinseln von Maps4BW bringt jedoch keine Verbesserung der Datenqualität mit sich!

Mehr Informationen dazu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW

Da habe ich leider schon zu viele Erfahrung mit machen müssen, z.B.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71623

Sofern du deine Änderungen also nicht durch vor-Ort-Begehungen oder Luftbilder verifizieren kannst, bitte ich dich, diese rückgängig zu machen.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Supaplex (2021-03-23 11:35:44+00:00): 為何要移除台語的標示呢?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101557233
twF6wdEYwL (2021-03-23 16:24:44+00:00): Sorry, i have mistaken
Patchanka (2021-03-23 16:17:19+00:00): bonjour
je ne comprend pas votre correction sur la capacité. Ne peut-on pas accrocher 2 vélos par "poteau" ? Auquel cas cela fait bien capacity=6
Fost OT Seignanx (2021-03-23 16:35:03+00:00): Bonjour Patchanka,
Moi aussi je croyais la même chose et après confirmation de personnes formées à OSM récemment, il faut indiquer le nombre de poteaux ou d'anneaux. C'est pour ça que je me suis permise de modifier...
Patchanka (2021-03-23 17:49:57+00:00): Alors c'est vous qui aviez bien compris.
Voir la page du wiki rubrique Attributs additionnels : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_parking
Bonne soirée
Fost OT Seignanx (2021-03-23 19:45:25+00:00): En lisant le document que vous m'avez envoyé je ne suis plus si sûre...je vais aller me renseigner pour bien confirmer tout ça.
Bonne soirée
DDROMAGNY (2021-03-26 08:27:53+00:00): Bonjour à vous deux, 
Je confirme, grâce à l'image de Mapillary :https://www.mapillary.com/app/?login=true&lat=43.526648399972224&lng=-1.4509201&z=17&pKey=eAYwKlYfja5HRGNizbJKd3&focus=photo 
On peut bien y mettre 6 vélos.
Fost OT Seignanx (2021-03-26 08:41:20+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour la précision et je vais modifier ça de ce pas!
Bonne journée
Patchanka (2021-03-26 08:48:05+00:00): bonjour
je pense que la question portait plutôt sur ce qu'il faut indiquer dans le tag capacity. @Fost' indiquait le nombre de "poteaux" et non le nombre de vélos.
C'est bien le nombre de vélos qu'il faut indiquer dans capacity.
bonne journée
DDROMAGNY (2021-03-26 09:21:13+00:00): Merci pour ta précision ;)
eggie (2021-03-23 10:35:03+00:00): Alle oneway regels heb ik hier verwijderd ook uitzondering moped
gr eggie
eggie (2021-03-23 10:41:43+00:00): Hi I merged the info with the addressnode.
gr eggie
Ben97 (2021-03-23 09:22:57+00:00): Could you please make sure that you do not connect things that don't have anything to do with each other, for example the landcover and the path to Geldingadalir. This is 1. not correct and 2. makes it very annoying to edit these objects.
Ben97 (2021-03-23 09:25:49+00:00): And please provide a source
pallih (2021-03-23 09:26:53+00:00): Yes! Sorry. I'll fix right now.
mavl (2021-03-24 14:39:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не в качестве претензии.  
Есть какое-то соглашение о записи номеров стрелок в OSM?
user_6446486 (2021-03-24 15:03:26+00:00): Добрый день. Формально прописанного нет, я ориентировался на следующие моменты:
1. Стрелок с буквами в номере на территории РФ не так уж и много, и из того что есть - немалая часть уже была размечена с большой буквой в номере (запрос в overpass - node["railway"="switch"]["ref"~"с",i](area:3600060189); , станции на линии Москва - Санкт-Петербург, где литеру своими правками я не менял).
2. Отсмотр фотографий (в основном буквы используются в номерах сбрасывающих стрелок) показал, что на местности превалируется написание явно заглавными. Примеры:
https://avatars.mds.yandex.net/get-zen_doc/1671180/pub_5ce171410a0d8b00b24d10c8_5ce5b1c804e7d900b36c525a/scale_1200
https://cdn.dvizhenie24.ru/2019/08/w6-1024x765.jpg
http://scbist.com/photoplog/images/1056/1_P6010647.JPG
3. По выкладывавшимся на различных тематических форумах ранее официальных схемах ЖД станций тоже используется написание с большой буквы в номерах путей, стрелок и светофоров:
https://ibb.co/qFz9srm

Надо отметить, что это верно только применительно к России. В других странах, наоборот, может использоваться подчёркнуто маленькая буква - например, в Италии:
http://scbist.com/photoplog/images/13206/1_DSCF4862.JPG
mavl (2021-03-24 15:28:26+00:00): Понятно. Спасибо.
ndm (2021-03-23 20:24:18+00:00): Could you please add back the traffic island into Pennywell Road that's visible on Bing - it also seems to be visible on your Mapillary image :-)
southglos (2021-03-23 20:46:20+00:00): Pennywell Road didn't have the split flare at the end, just joined Lawfords Gate at an angle.  So I haven't deleted an island, just didn't add one. 

I'm usually hesitant to add islands, as I don't really feel highway=pedestrian is right for a traffic island.  landuse=traffic_island was better, but seems not to have found a footing (wiki lists as abandoned).
ndm (2021-03-23 20:57:37+00:00): My bad -- it's a definite improvement.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:37:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
user_2066394 (2021-09-26 17:34:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2869925
user_11418917 (2021-04-02 11:36:49+00:00): There is 3 points here in this location for the company. stop adding duplicated pointes! thats consider as spam! I removed the duplicated points.
ma-rt-in (2021-03-26 06:19:18+00:00): Hallo,
was genau befindet sich bei Node 8553175320 vor Ort?
vg
relssekh (2021-03-26 08:56:34+00:00): Hallo, hier befindet sich ein Marienhäuschen. Habe außer Place of Worship nichts Treffenderes gefunden. 
Mfg
ma-rt-in (2021-04-01 08:32:38+00:00): Passt das nicht eher dann: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine

Zudem ist es sinnvoll weitere tags zuerfassen, wie Glaubensrichtung, name, etc.

vg
DressyPear4 (2021-03-24 21:01:54+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101561077
poornibadrinath (2021-03-23 09:58:34+00:00): Missed adding source tag: OSC Cam imagery and Maxar Satellite
marc__marc (2021-03-26 23:52:59+00:00): Bonjour,
la chaîne se place sur un point à sa position. j'ai fais la modification. y-a-t-il aussi une barrière ou une chaîne à l’extrémité nord ?
Cordialement,
Marc
OGI2B (2021-04-08 09:30:17+00:00): Bonjour Marc,
Oui, l'extrémité nord est fermée par une palissade.
Bien à vous
Cristoffs (2021-03-23 11:14:39+00:00): Tak nie stosuje się nazw. Proszę popraw zgodnie zasadami oznaczenia takich obiektów na stronie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
user_5359 (2021-03-24 04:36:01+00:00): Hello! The key currency describe the accepted currency not the necessary fee see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/710021956/history
trigpoint (2021-03-30 17:40:20+00:00): Legally a bridleway so motor_vehicle=private and added access tags for foot/horses and bikes
b-holdet (2021-06-09 10:50:09+00:00): Forest "Kregme Mosevej" does not exist. Where did you get that name from?

You can see the correct name here

https://sdfekort.dk/spatialmap?mapheight=888&mapwidth=1925&label=&ignorefavorite=true&profile=sdfekort&selectorgroups=stednavne+dhm&layers=theme-dtk_skaermkort_daempet_daf+theme-stednavne_daf&opacities=1+1&mapext=688215.2380896044+6202096.358788248+693795.8213450172+6204662.845774982&maprotation=
Santurce (2021-06-09 20:53:57+00:00): Hi b-holdet, thanks for reaching out! I did not initially add this name -- in this changeset I created a relation to better represent the water features within the forest and transferred all of the tags over from the original way feature. 
It actually looks like you may have initially added the current name back in 2017 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51462819. 
I’d be happy to make an update with the sdfekort you sent over though!
b-holdet (2021-06-10 08:31:30+00:00): I wasn't aware of the history, sorry.
But I will change the name.
Hope you can use the SDFE map and the many layers
Mannivu (2021-03-23 10:35:34+00:00): Dalle immagini satellitari, il pezzo di Via Guzzasete compreso tra la ferrovia e l'autostrada non sembra passare sotto a nulla, quindi "tunnel=yes" credo si errato.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101564863
ulzana (2021-03-23 10:51:32+00:00): Io ci passo in bicicletta, è comunque la continuazione del sottopasso che passa sotto l'autostrada ed è tutto interrato. La strada com'era disegnata prima non permetteva di costruire un itinerario.
Mannivu (2021-03-23 10:54:28+00:00): Ma se non è coperto, indicarlo come "tunnel" è incorretto. Quanto all'itinerario mi sembra strano, dato che qui https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=45.5066,9.6347;45.5145,9.6316#map=16/45.5106/9.6333 funziona senza problemi
ulzana (2021-03-23 11:18:37+00:00): ho ripristinato
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-23 10:28:53+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 100502262, 100502522, 101417356, 90604048, 90607445, 90607470, 90607511, 90607642, 90607729, 90608049, 90608134, 90608173, 90608282, 90608490, 92117417, 92117441, 92117462, 92117476, 92117535, 92117579, 92117609, 92117633, 92117669, 92117700, 92117948, 92477264, 92477287, 95448926, 95449256, 95449275, 98194627, 98194818, 98194980, 98195095, 98195797, 98195969, 98880223, 99138621, 99328980.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-23 10:47:10+00:00): ... and " in Florida" should have been "mostly in Florida, but also https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8468290 in New York and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7283733 in Texas".
geoaria (2021-05-14 16:22:39+00:00): هنگام ترسیم مسیر ها به درجه بندی راهها توجه کنید شببکه ای از چند residential توسط یک جاده درجه سه tertiary و شبکه ای از مسیر های residential  و  tertiary  توسط یک جاده درجه دو secondary و الی آخر تکمیل می شود . در این چنگست شما کوچه را با یک جاده درجه سه تگ کرده اید که اشتباه است. در ضمن حتما در هنگام رسید مسیر به یک مسیر دیگر اتصال روی مسیر تقاطع ایجاد کنید و مسیر را ÷ایان دهید و دوباره مسیر دیگر را رسم کنید . در این چنگست در چندین مورد روی هم قرار گیری دو مسیر مشاهده می شود که اشتباه است . یک مورد اصلاح شد.
dmlu (2021-03-23 11:07:01+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap 🎉🎉😊

Thank you for your first contribution! 

If the garden has completely moved to the new location, you should remove the name "Old Gaart Belval location" from the old garden. That way there won't be any ambiguities.

Perhaps you want to add website=* to your new location?

Don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions!

Kind regards,
David / dmlu
czubi (2021-10-21 15:19:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921272570 ?leer?
_torsten_ (2021-10-21 18:04:36+00:00): Nö, jetzt nicht mehr. :-)
Kaziu Kisiel (2021-03-23 11:32:02+00:00): Tak bardziej w rzeczywistości chodziło o oddzielenie terenów oznaczonych jako las od ogrodzenia.
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-21 01:06:30+00:00): Hi harsha_pally. Your edit looks awesome, but there's an issue with highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/921275406) due data doesn’t exist on imagery and cause crossing with water body. Would you mind to recheck and fix the issue, please? If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143787287). Thank you.
eggie (2021-03-23 11:51:41+00:00): Dag TvdB,
Zie nu dat je om feedback vraagt.
Lijkt me een strakke actie zo.  De paaltjes heb ik even toegevoegd. (met moped en mofa=yes)
motor_vehicle=no en bicycle=yes heb ik verwijderd. Dat hoort niet op een fietspad en is default.
Geldt ook voor foot=yes, maar dat laat ik meestal staan.
Mapse verder,
Eggie
eggie (2021-03-23 12:02:21+00:00): Even gespiekt
Officieel zal het geen fietspad zijn dus highwat=path had ook gekund.
Zelfs residential als het breed genoeg is voor auto's. ... 
De paaltjes zorgen dan dat het niet routeert voor motor_voertuigen.
Wanneer motorfietsen hier mogen oversteken dan motorcycle=yes toevoegen aan de paaltjes.