piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2016-10-26 17:53:57+00:00): HI Aleks-Berlin,

regarding item 1: If you want to calculate the land area, that's trivial. Even if you want to calculate the area on sea which belongs to Russian territory, it is simple.

regarding item 2: If you software is unable to calculate correctly if the orientation of the segments is wrong you either have to patch your software or fix this error in your OSM extract before doing the calculation (suggestion: use libosmium or buy a paid shape file).

regarding item 3: That's no argument. I think that Overpass API is able to handle such a request. Or you filter the relation out of the Russia extract from Geofabrik.

regarding item 4: That's no reason to introduce new questionable stuff.

Please remove all sqkm=* you added or I will do.

Best regards

Michael
woodpeck (2016-10-26 18:22:50+00:00): If I may add 2 points: (a) Just because there is rubbish in OSM, that's not an excuse to add more! (b) Wikidata is more often than not derived from Wikipedia which is licensed CC-BY-SA; I know that Wikidata claims to be CC0 but I highly doubt the legality of this.
SimonPoole (2016-10-26 19:00:40+00:00): It should be noted that the WMF does not make any representations that the contents of wikidata are actually free of any third party rights, The CC0 licence of wikidata is simply based on a position statement by the WMF that facts can't be copyrighted..
Aleks-Berlin (2016-10-26 21:02:43+00:00): again: how to calc the area of nodes (like place=ocean, that do not have any border) ?
Who should question the free usage of facts?
I understand that area can be calulated 'easy' for smaller objects. But why download megabytes to get one number?
With this argument we should stop overpass-turbo.eu, because anything can be done using planet.osm file. Sometimes a shortcut to information is usefull. Why not make it more comfortable?
SimonPoole (2016-10-26 21:31:39+00:00): You already have the comfort of looking up the value via the wikidata reference for not essential things (as for example the area).
Nakaner (2016-10-26 21:34:54+00:00): … and therefore there is no need anymore to add this information to OpenStreetMap because the object which represents the territory of Russia (relation 60189) already has wikidata=Q159.
Aleks-Berlin (2016-10-27 17:43:58+00:00): removed again for this relation, but todo (next days) for others
Andreas Binder (2016-10-25 18:53:06+00:00): Falscher Kommentar: Sollte heißen "Details nach aufgezeichneter Autofahrt", Source: survey;bayern(80cm)
dbf_ (2016-10-25 21:05:34+00:00): Добрый день, в поле "Номер дома" должен быть указан номер дома и ни что иное.
mosstreet (2016-10-25 19:37:12+00:00): any reason to change something that is not created? maybe it's worth to at least something to do? Your amendment has complete nonsense
ediyes (2016-10-25 21:15:42+00:00): Hi there!

Thank you for your comment, but I need to know what is the exact error?, This edit is removing a duplicated street.

Edith.
mtrnord (2016-10-25 19:49:17+00:00): Actually wrong Title. I did add buildings. Sorry
redrace (2016-10-26 17:43:33+00:00): HUHU
Du hast u.a. an der Schmiedegasse 27 die Adressdaten entfernt und an den POI der Massagepraxis getaggt. Hat das einen Sinn? 
Schöne Grüße Meik (redrace)
chris66 (2016-10-27 07:34:55+00:00): Ja, der Benefit ist, dass so die Adresse mit dem POI assoziiert wird.
redrace (2016-10-27 09:25:52+00:00): Huhu 
Und was ist wenn der Poi unbedarft gelöscht wird! Meiner Meinung nach ist es besser die Daten am Gebäude zu belassen und den Poi ggf. ebenfalls mit Adressaten zu versehen. Was ich eigentlich aber als überflüssig ansehen denn der Poi wir ja im Gebäude angezeigt. Die doppelte Angabe der Adresse wird auch im Forum wohl gerne gesehen und auch gemacht.
chris66 (2016-10-27 09:29:23+00:00): Da gibt es halt keinen Goldstandard. Ich bin kein Fan von Doppelungen.
redrace (2016-10-27 10:11:55+00:00): Huhu 
Eben weil es kein einstimmige Meinung gibt sollte man das Entfernen der Daten unterlassen. Ich bin auch kein Fan von doppelten Dingen.  Darum erfasse ich POI auch in der Regel ohne Adressedaten solange ich sie einem Gebäude zuordnen kann. Zumindest bis jetzt.  Wenn der Poi wird jetzt verschoben wird, aus welchen Gründen auch immer, ist das Gebäude ohne Hausnummer. Machtbauch keinen Sinn.  Also dann bin ich dafür in dem Fall Redundant zu erfassen.  Aber das Entfernen der Daten ist auf jeden Fall nicht in Ordnung. 
Schöne Grüße Meik
redrace (2016-10-27 10:33:29+00:00): Huhu 
Habe ich eben vergessen.:-)
Wir mappen ja was wir sehen.  An fast jedem Gebäude ist eine Hausnummer.  Aber an dem Geschäft im Gebäude steht in der Regel nur der Name! 😁
Schöne Grüße Meik
highflyer74 (2016-10-27 13:38:45+00:00): Hallo zusammen! Ohne mir den konkrekten Fall angesehen zu haben und auch ohne ein Fan von Doppelungen zu sein: wenn man sich zwischen Adresse am POI oder am Gebäude entscheiden muss (will), dann sollte das Gebäude auf jeden Fall mit einer Adresse versehen werden, denn die bleibt. POIs kommen und gehen, wie schon von redrace erläutert. Weiterhin fröhliches Mappen!
redrace (2016-10-27 14:46:04+00:00): Dopplungen gehen ja noch aber was ist in Ärztehäusern oder Einkaufszentren z. B. da gibt es mehrere Arztpraxen oder Geschäfte. Da hast Du dann Verxfachungen :-) der Adresse. 
Also ich packe an die Gebäude wieder die Adressdaten. Denn das ist für mich der sinvollere Weg.
Schöne Grüße Meik
SomeoneElse (2016-11-22 11:53:37+00:00): Oops - some buildings and building nodes got dragged into the middle of the sea here.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/762380470/history#map=17/46.19626/38.20465 .
SomeoneElse (2016-11-22 11:58:30+00:00): See also https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/53071/how-to-remove-wrong-building
dudka (2016-11-22 12:27:15+00:00): syberrus removed this building in changeset 43869048, but I reverted his changes by changeset 43869333 and moved building back to proper location
andygol (2016-11-22 13:23:09+00:00): SomeoneElse, I even haven't any idea how this building turned up in the middle of the sea. Because main purpose of my edits was working with the address relation, but not editing shapes of the buildings.  

Dudka, thank you for fixing this issue.
andygol (2016-11-22 13:28:54+00:00): Yeah, it looks weird 🤒

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43171930
SHARCRASH (2017-08-21 16:58:15+00:00): Hello! You had created this track https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449440189 but it crosses a fence visible on the satellite imagery at this position https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5048773555 What is the real situation? Is it a former track since it's nearly overcrowded by grass, is there a gate, is there a gap in the fence... ?
Thanks for clarifying.
Frédéric Gutkin (2017-08-28 09:08:40+00:00): Hello SHARCRASH,
In fact, the way coming from the forest stops before the farmyard. The visible track was a fence. I corrected it.
Thank you for your remark and sorry.
Regards
SHARCRASH (2017-08-31 10:14:11+00:00): Hi! OK thanks! Happy plotting!
literan (2016-10-26 14:12:35+00:00): было б здорово, конечно, при переименовании старое название в old_name засунуть - могут искать по нему
Freek Bes (2016-10-25 19:52:53+00:00): Ik bedoelde natuurlijk

https://www.amsterdam.nl/publish/pages/561597/tekening_inspraak_kruising_kadoelenweg_-_vorticellaweg_v1_0.pdf
cadsauxk (2017-08-14 18:17:32+00:00): Olá Tarcis, por favor não mude a rodovia de classificação sem consultar a comunidade. Essa rodovia é de terra, deve ser somente tertiary.
tarcisttobias (2017-11-29 20:03:49+00:00): Ok desculpa, nem me recordo a alteração que fiz.
Tomas Straupis (2016-10-25 21:04:11+00:00): Neteisingas adreso keitimas. Pakeitimas atšauktas.
Peilscheibe (2016-10-25 21:08:20+00:00): Du hast hier die Relation der Radroute "Bodenseeradweg" gelöscht. Kannst Du das bitte erklären?
kartenschreiber (2016-10-26 07:10:46+00:00): Sry!!! Das war nicht beabsichtigt. Kann ich das wieder rückgängig machen?
Peilscheibe (2016-10-26 10:03:09+00:00): Habe ich bereits gemacht. Wenn ich einen Ratschlag geben darf: Du benutzt JOSM, das ist gut ;-) Wenn Du die "Befehlsliste" ständig auf dem Bildschirm hast, siehst Du immer was Du gerade gemacht hast, dann fällt sowas schneller auf.
kartenschreiber (2016-10-26 20:18:43+00:00): Danke für den Tipp!! Gruß
tyr_asd (2016-10-26 07:04:30+00:00): Why did you remove the non Italian names from tis place node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3658626298/history (see https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavarone)?

Also, the removal of bilingual names in Valle della Fersina (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3420327670/history) seems very problematic, as I can't find a discussion about this with the local community (e.g. in https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it-trentino/). At least from my outside perspective the names should be bilingual (see wikipedia: *“La toponomastica locale è bilingue: presenta il nome della località prima in italiano, poi in mocheno. Tutto questo è regolamentato da una legge e da un regolamento provinciale che concretizzano lo Statuto di Autonomia delle Province Autonome di Trento e Bolzano che esprime la parte sulle minoranze linguistiche.”* https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pal%C3%B9_del_Fersina).
fayor (2016-10-26 13:14:31+00:00): Lavarone è un "comune sparso", non esiste una località abitata chiamata Lavarone, la sede comunale si chiama Gionghi. I nomi in altre lingue di Lavarone si trovano nella relazione boundary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/46505
Per quanto riguarda i nomi bilingui nel tag "name", questi dovrebbero esserci solo nella provincia di Bolzano, non in quella di Trento (vedi elenchi Istat e Agenzia delle Entrate).
tyr_asd (2016-10-29 08:32:08+00:00): How do you know? Do you live there? People on the regional mailing list (who know the local situation better than me) seem to be of a different opinion: see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it-trentino/2016-October/001094.html and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it-trentino/2016-October/001091.html

I would kindly ask you to please revert your changes for the time being and contribute to the discussion on the mailing list to solve this question. Once it's resolved, we can go on to implement any eventually needed changes together as a community! Thanks!
fayor (2016-10-29 12:52:49+00:00): È chiaro che ognuno può avere opinioni diverse. Al momento non c'è una regolamentazione univoca. Sul wiki non si parla del Trentino (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#Alto_Adige.2FS.C3.BCdtirol_.28South_Tyrol.29) e sulla lista italiana si sta cercando una soluzione per situazioni analoghe, ma non è ancora partita la votazione.
tyr_asd (2016-11-22 09:52:50+00:00): > votazione

OK, so you clearly acknowledge that a discussion has to be held (and optimally consensus has to be achieved) inside the local community in order to avoid conflicts and edit wars? Why didn't you start a discussion on this topic before changing stuff around to match your personal taste?

As you can see in the linked thread of the local mailing list, people are here of the opinion that the mentioned towns should be named bilingually (as they are even signposted bilingually on the ground). Are you OK with me (partially) reverting this changeset in order to get back to the previous state in order to fulfill the will of the community?
SomeoneElse (2017-01-21 19:59:55+00:00): @tyr_asd given the lack of response here, I'd revert the removal of the tags.  A similar thing happened in Sardinia (see talk-it https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2016-August/thread.html#54305 and much discussion after that).
If someone who lives locally comes forward and says that "name:cim really doesn't belong here" then fair enough; but until that time it seems wrong to remove it.
mapper999 (2016-11-05 17:21:09+00:00): Diese Linie (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449445289) hat keine tags. Hast du die tags vergessen oder kann die Linie gelöscht werden?
maraf24 (2016-10-28 09:09:00+00:00): Konstantego Damrota, a nie Damrota, bo w OSM zawsze dajemy imię.
streckenkundler (2016-10-26 07:06:29+00:00): Hei,

bei deinem Edit hast du bei der Spreewaldbahn einen Fehler gemacht. Der Streckenabschnitt: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113706964 war in seinen ursprünlichen Verlauf korrekt. Die Strecke verlief zwischen den bestehenden Gebäuden hindurch, die aktuelle Gebäudesituation existierte bereits zur Betriebszeit. Fotos in der Literatur belegn das. Bitte ändere das wieder zurück. Ich kenne die Streckenverläufe der Spreewaldbahn sehr genau. 

Eine Grundsätzliche Sache noch. Ich persönlich finde es unschön, wenn in deinem Beispiel hauptsächlich Elemente im Harz geändert werden und dann ein einzelnes noch im Spreewald. Ich bitte dich, die Änderungen zukünftig in gesonderten Changesets hochzuladen.

Danke.

Sven
streckenkundler (2016-10-26 07:25:44+00:00): Ach ja, falls du den WMS-Dienst
http://isk.geobasis-bb.de/ows/dr25_wms verwendet haben solltest, zu dem die jetzige Streckenführung passt... Dieser Dienst darf nicht verwendet werden, es ist eine unerlaubte Quelle. Auch sind auf diesen Karten die Strechkenführungen generalisiert und passen nie 100%ig zur Situation vor Ort!!!

Sven
streckenkundler (2016-10-26 19:06:37+00:00): Abschnitt der Spreewaldbahn wiederhergestellt.
eskarina (2016-10-31 16:29:23+00:00): Hi Sven,

Sorry, falls ich da was kaputt repariert habe. Der Verlauf sah mir etwas unnatürlich aus was oftmals passiert, wenn man zu wenige Nodes spendiert.
Danke für Deine Aufmerksamkeit und das revert-en.

Gruss,
Eskarina
Cyclono (2016-10-26 19:52:39+00:00): good job!!
Paul_012 (2016-10-25 20:44:53+00:00): Yes, this is literally tagging for the renderer, and should be reverted some time in the future. However, the most relevant & common use of these tags is likely for rendering 3D buildings, and many applications are still unable to recognise building outlines vs parts. I think this is reasonable as a temporary measure.
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-06-09 05:52:22+00:00): Hi DannyAiquipa,
I've modified this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/449449163) based on maxar premium. I also made some changes around this changeset.
Thank you, happy mapping!
geri-oc (2019-05-13 06:36:55+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=14.04694&lat=50.86313&zoom=14&opacity=1.00
Hjart (2016-12-14 20:06:51+00:00): Vær opmærksom på at rundkørslen Brogade/Storegade er en såkaldt minirundkørsel som vi normalt markerer med en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout
nammala (2016-10-26 03:47:47+00:00): Hi Yulia_Car,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind deleting `natural=wood`. 

Regards,
krishna
SomeoneElse (2016-12-29 20:00:43+00:00): Hi @nammala,
What are the planned next steps with this one?
Cheers,
Andy
nammala (2017-01-02 04:00:37+00:00): Hi Andy,

The user still didn't get back and there is no changes to the changeset. Would you like go ahead and revert the changeset.

Cheers,
nammala
richlv (2016-10-25 22:25:41+00:00): thanks a lot for the improvement and for the useful changeset message :)
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-07-30 02:56:39+00:00): Hi RichRico
I'va changed this road classification of this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43176541) to residential road
Thank you
mueschel (2016-10-28 11:11:24+00:00): Hallo,
dir ist da ein kleiner Tippfehler unterlaufen, an einigen Wegen steht destination:int:ref mit : anstelle von _ in int_ref. 
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/jGs

Gruß, Jan
Smiljan_02 (2016-11-04 07:57:55+00:00): Hallo Jan,

danke für deinen Hinweis, habe es berichtigt.

Gruß, Senni
juvvanapudi_1 (2019-03-29 17:10:52+00:00): Hi  yurasi

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Aceh, I have come across way 234521302 classified as 'UnClassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance.
nammala (2016-10-26 03:38:56+00:00): Hi  LBeidler,

May I know the reason behind deleting the roads.

regards,
nammala
SomeoneElse (2016-11-29 15:24:34+00:00): Hi nammala,
What are your planned next steps here?
Cheers,
Andy
santamariense (2016-10-25 23:50:53+00:00): Bem vindo à comunidade OpenStreetMap.
Parabéns pelo detalhamento feito ao adicionar o Totem ao mapa. Boas contribuições. Qualquer dúvida é só contactar.
AgusQui (2016-11-06 03:29:20+00:00): Este conjunto de cambios ha sido completamente revertido, por favor tenga mas cuidado de aqui en adelante
eggie (2017-01-18 19:15:35+00:00): Ha padvinder,
Er zitten erg weinig verbindingsnodes hier. De wegen kruisen, maar je kunt niet afslaan. Ik ben aan het repareren geslagen. Misschien eens overstappen op JOSM? Die geeft een waarschuwing bij uploaden. MVG, Egbert
trigpoint (2016-10-26 17:55:49+00:00): Please remember that OSM is a public database and it is considered vandalism to rename existing objects as personal markers.
I am reverting this change.
Gumeg (2016-11-24 10:20:20+00:00): Это название где-то уже установилиу парка? Про голосование в курсе, но пока не видел нигде объявлений.
Gumeg (2016-11-24 10:30:17+00:00): Судя по всему название у это зоны официальное - "Парк у Святого озера" http://sovdepku.ru/news/a-319.html Поправлю
neo-plan (2016-11-24 11:58:53+00:00): А как было? В газете "Восточный округ" приводилась выдержка с какого-то официального сайта правительства.
Gumeg (2016-11-24 12:51:05+00:00): Сначала его называли просто "Народный парк", его построили по одноименное программе. Потом было голосование за название где победило именно это "Парк у Святого озера". Но я не стал добавлять, так как ни табличек там до сих пор не висело никаких.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-10-29 22:47:03+00:00): Proszę nie dokonywać bezsensownych zmian w adresacji.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-10-29 22:49:35+00:00): Jeśli ten adres nie wyszukuje się w Maps,me, proszę zgłaszać problem do Maps.me. W danych OpenStreetMap jest wszystko OK.
Glassman (2016-10-26 05:19:02+00:00): The website doesn't have any news about going out of business. Nothing in a search of news articles. Do you have any documentation to back up removing a section of the course?
pdxrider (2016-10-26 06:10:14+00:00): I remembered that their website was replaced with a notice regarding closure due to construction activity, but can't seem to find it now. But I found some social media posts about it.
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1049628695083477&id=173173612728994
https://www.reddit.com/r/camaswashington/comments/455d5a/green_mountain_golf_course_has_closed/
BuellR (2016-10-27 03:35:48+00:00): Yeah, the course closed about a year ago.  I live up the street.  Just found out about your maps and started looking around my neighborhood.  Noticed the golf course that isn't there.  I didn't delete the trails and roads because of all the heavy construction going on right now.  I just don't know what's left.  Thanks, Rob
user_5359 (2016-10-26 19:43:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-26 19:41:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
DavidKewley (2016-10-26 21:10:44+00:00): Thanks so much for contributing so much work to this Tanzania project. I have a recommendation and request for you. Most buildings either have square corners, or are round. When you draw a square-corner building, draw it close, then while you still have it selected, press the 's' key in the editor to make the corners square. This only works if the corners are already close to square. When you see a round building, first draw a triangle area with the three points roughly evenly spaced around the circle, at the edges of the circle. Then press the 'o' key with the triangle selected, and the editor will turn it into a neat circle. Thanks once again, and hope this works well for you. Feel free to reach out to me for any help. -David
literan (2016-10-26 15:23:22+00:00): Здравствуйте! спасибо за ваши правки. Маленький момент: ворота надо вешать на точку, входящую в состав линии забора (и дороги, если она проходит там), а не просто рядом
user_5359 (2016-10-26 19:40:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
gileri (2016-11-06 22:25:12+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai supprimé ce nœud car tu l'as déjà créé le 10 octobre :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4441243394/history
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
highflyer74 (2016-10-27 07:05:30+00:00): Moin Schramme!

Guck' mal eben bei MussWessels... Da stehen noch Infos vom vorherigen Bäcker.

Gruss aus HB!
Schramme (2016-10-27 08:11:32+00:00): Hi, hab ich korrigiert. Gruß Schramme
user_5359 (2016-10-26 19:42:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-26 19:34:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-26 19:33:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-26 19:32:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-10-26 19:28:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2019-01-31 16:58:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.