piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
JMUU (2019-01-25 22:29:34+00:00): De doorgang is onderdeel van het zogenaamde WLZ gebouw (wonen-leren-zorg). Aan deze doorgang zitten o.a. een tandarts en een fysiotherapeut, dus deze lijkt mij overdag in ieder geval voor iedereen toegankelijk (legio mensen gebruikt deze doorgang ook om een stukje af te snijden richting het station). Of deze ook 's avonds/nachts geopend is weet ik niet zeker, ik denk eigenlijk van niet
S-zation (2019-01-25 21:15:46+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all of the changes made in changesets 65451970, 60986708
jaap de vries (2019-01-28 09:50:01+00:00): Ik zie dat je een adres hebt toegevoegd. Ziet er goed uit maar normaal gesproken geven we ook de bronlocatie aan. Dat is in Nederland de BAG, zie hier een voorbeeld https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2795783608 .
user_3216889 (2019-01-27 22:57:29+00:00): Enige zekerheid over al die 'voortuintjes' in de Hortensialaan, is dat er een heg omheen staat aan drie zijden.
Maar of er binnen die heggen gras is, dan wel struiken en/of tegels ....

Verder: markering van enkele stukjes langs de Oliemuldersweg met natural=yes is geen zinvolle toevoeging, het is nietszeggend (en wordt terecht niet op de kaart getoond). Het is groen en geen gras, het zijn lage planten of kruipende heesters, geen idee (ben geen botanicus). Mijn uitgangspunt: als het onduidelijk is, niet taggen.
Commodoortje (2019-01-25 22:03:46+00:00): Je hebt (per ongeluk?) het gebouw gewist.
Inmiddels heb ik de changeset teruggedraaid.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66644489
Commodoortje (2019-01-25 22:06:56+00:00): Je had het zelf ook inmiddels gecorrigeerd.
Commodoortje (2019-01-25 22:28:32+00:00): Bij nader inzien corrigeer ik de mutatie van het tankstation.
Je had een stuk erbij aangetrokken, maar dit staat niet in de BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen)
Natuurlijk mag je gebouwen die niet in de bag staan wel toevoegen, maar doe dit dan als los gebouw.
In dit geval is het een gebouw waar je onder door kan rijden (building=roof)
Hier kun je er iets over lezen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=roof
Hier kun je zien wat ik heb aangepast:
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66645405
flohoff (2019-01-26 09:19:43+00:00): Moin,
ist nds ein valider iso country code?

Ich dachte das name:<iso3361 code> valide ist. nds hört sich da reichlich kaputt an.

Fo
flohoff (2019-01-28 18:59:13+00:00): Moin,
ich habe da mal die Bank von dem Rest getrennt. Das ist ja nen label node der boundary. Wenn müsste der name also auf die relation nicht auf den label node.

Ich habe das wieder entfernt.

Flo
Slomox (2019-01-28 19:23:06+00:00): Moin,
names richten sich nicht nach ISO-3166, sondern nach ISO-639 und da ist nds ein valider ISO-639-3-Code.

Das mit der Bank ist mir aufgefallen und hat mich irritiert, aber ich habe es als "komisch, aber jemand mit mehr Ahnung wird sich dabei etwas gedacht haben" hingenommen.

Mir geht es darum, die plattdeutschen Namen auf OSM verfügbar zu machen, so dass der Renderer der Wikimedia Foundation (plattdeutsche Version unter https://maps.wikimedia.org/?lang=nds ) die Karte entsprechend darstellt. Da das Label einen eigenen Name hatte, habe ich den plattdeutschen Namen hier auch eingetragen.

Falls der Anzeigename des Labels einer Relation sowieso immer von der Relation genommen wird, dann war das überflüssig und kann meinetwegen auch entfallen. Da ein name eingetragen war, wollte ich sichergehen.

Gruß
Slomox
TheFish (2019-03-08 08:52:48+00:00): Hallo KlausG,

es gibt einen Fehlerhinweis auf der Karte, der anscheinend mit deiner Änderung zu tun hat:

"Die Stromleitung wurde nach Osten hin versetzt!

Das war auch bereits richtig erfasst aber jetzt ist sie wieder an der falschen Stelle!!!"

Könntest du das überprüfen? Danke!
KlausG (2019-03-13 15:51:41+00:00): Ich konnte mir das nur im Satbild anschauen und musste erst mal raten, was mit dem Fehlerhinweis gemeint ist.
Meine Änderungen bzw. Ergänzungen entstanden, nachdem mein Zug dort längere Zeit warten musste, und ich bin mir nicht mehr sicher, was ich dort geändert haben soll. Offenbar ist das die grosse Hochspannungsleitung, die dort versetzt wurde. Wenn ich Glück habe, komme ich demnächst mit wenig Umweg mal mit dem Auto vorbei und kann das mal in Ruhe zu Fuss checken.
ma-rt-in (2019-01-26 11:12:00+00:00): Hallo,
2 Anmerkungen:
1) Wenn du Gebäude neuerstellts, versuche bitte die History zu erhalten. Also nicht das "alte" Gebäude einfach löschen.
2) Bei den Adressen brauchst du das Kastel-Staadt nicht, wenn es schon im city drin ist.
vg
ma-rt-in (2019-01-27 14:17:51+00:00): Hallo,
du hast bei deiner Korrektur südlich von Kastel eine Relation zerstört.
vg
Maxometer (2019-01-27 15:00:49+00:00): Das ist mir gar nicht aufgefallen. Danke für den Hinweis.
Mfg
ma-rt-in (2019-01-27 15:05:53+00:00): Sollte es eigentlich da du JOSM verwendet. Bin grad an Serrig dran und da hat er mir den Fehler für Kastel ausgegeben.
mueschel (2019-01-30 12:06:47+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the tags 
gate_finial 	horse_head
man_made 	gate_fniial
These are not used in any other place and seem to contain some spelling mistakes.

Jan
SK53 (2019-01-30 12:45:30+00:00): https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=horses+head+gate+finial&qpvt=horses+head+gate+finial&FORM=IGRE

and yes the man_made tag is mis-spelt
nevw (2019-01-26 08:31:30+00:00): Hi
correct syntax is bridge=yes
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge
davemcn (2019-01-27 05:46:19+00:00): Oh yes, sorry. thanks.
partyfan (2020-12-23 09:49:57+00:00): 22/12/2020
ANAS: APERTA AL TRAFFICO LA SS79BIS “TERNANA” (DIRETTRICE TERNI-RIETI) TRA UMBRIA E LAZIO

https://www.stradeanas.it/it/anas-aperta-al-traffico-la-ss79bis-%E2%80%9Cternana%E2%80%9D-direttrice-terni-rieti-tra-umbria-e-lazio
Chieftl (2019-02-21 08:07:25+00:00): Добрий день
Як назва "Dim Siredzhukiv" правильно пишеться українською?
Seijon (2020-07-03 21:05:21+00:00): Спорное: перенёс название Аккем на историческое место - Это действительно спорно, потому что вершина Аккем на всех картах - это вершина 3334
665-475A (2019-01-26 09:50:35+00:00): You're tagging places that have already been
marked out, which is utterly redundant. Don't 
bother trying again and again, you're wasting 
everyone's time.
ndm (2019-01-26 12:12:57+00:00): Some of the name and name:en look more like descriptions than names, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2950423588
Bexhill-OSM (2019-01-28 12:06:22+00:00): Duplicating some places: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6237273788
Ageing Rocker (2019-01-28 23:08:45+00:00): Yes I’m sorry I must have hit “add place” instead of just saving a personal bookmark. Trouble is I don’t know how to correct the errors. Any advice welcome
Bexhill-OSM (2019-01-30 11:29:46+00:00): Hey Ageing Rocker,
You won't be able to correct the errors using Maps.Me, best option is to use the OpenStreetMap website and the Edit button.  Saying that, I've corrected those places for you, so don't worry too much.  Glad you're making the most of OSM and enjoying your travels!
Ageing Rocker (2019-01-30 15:02:12+00:00): Thanks Dr-Mx, for the corrections and the advice. I really like using Maps.Me, fantastic resource for planning and tracking my travels. Must be careful about Add Place vs Bookmark. Cheers
kartonage (2019-01-27 17:21:08+00:00): Hallo tmrbng, 
danke für das Hinzufügen von Gebäuden.

Kleiner Tipp für die Bearbeitung mit dem iD-Editor: bei ausgewähltem Objekt kannst du das Objekt mit 's' rechteckig machen. Hilfreich bei Gebäuden, da diese ja meist doch rechteckig sind.

Schöne Grüße
viloan (2019-01-26 01:54:15+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-01-26 02:23:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
andi9876 (2019-02-09 10:12:47+00:00): Dear, please stop add artwoks if there are is nothing, remember, it´s visible on map for everybody. Better u use an app for create ur own favorites.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-01-28 17:10:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 66708504, 66712182 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some sockpuppet vandalism of a primarily Italian data troll.  For more info see the links from https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2483
viloan (2019-01-26 03:41:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2019-02-02 04:05:57+00:00): Hi,
There are a few repairs to do ...

ps://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.21387&lat=-31.88315&zoom=6
Yury Br (2019-04-08 11:01:47+00:00): Добрый день,

Откуда название Казаниха?
Насколько я помню, как правило везде либо Хазиниха, либо Казиниха, название Казаниха первый раз вижу. 
В качестве условно официального названия Казиниха используется в заповеднике - см. например http://www.katunskiy.ru/posetitelyam/marshrutyi/-katunskie-vyisokogorya-
Miroff (2019-04-08 12:12:00+00:00): Добрый. Из какого-то отчета о походе. В письменных источниках этой речки нет, а при передаче названия на слух возможны вариации. Наверное, Кахиниха/Хазиниха действительно правильный вариант.
mueschel (2019-01-30 18:59:37+00:00): Hi,
could you check these two bus stops? Something went wrong with the tagging.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6089219904
aighes (2019-02-03 12:56:32+00:00): Thanks for the hint.
stevea (2019-02-06 20:32:54+00:00): Wilmaps (nice to "meet" you):  This is not the best tag on any "treed" campus area that isn't zoned or has a specific landuse.  The tag landuse=forest is "to mark areas of land managed for forestry."  This isn't that.

If you haven't, please read how complex and directly conflicting (with natural=wood) the tagging schemes can get at our wiki, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Forest .  Or, see a recent controversy (one that's been going on for many, many years; I recall one I participated in back in 2009, here:  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-January/042338.html , where in just a few days, dozens or a hundred?) of conflicting posts still couldn't unravel the arguments of this/these vs. that/those tagging conventions regarding "wooded" areas.

In the meantime, especially because this is an incorrect tag (these trees are not being "grown" to be "harvested" as they are in real timber-production zones, what OSM means by the "forest" tag), I suggest you remove this polygon in OSM.

Yes, The Natural Reserves are largely wooded (and tagged so), yes, the landuse=meadow polygons do a nice job of showing where there are meadows on campus.  The fact that "amenity=university" renders "light yellowish" where no other landuse=* or natural=* polygon superimposes upon it does NOT mean that we should start adding land COVER (quite distinct from land USE) to these areas.  In short:  #1, "don't tag for the renderer" and #2, "it is complicated."  (And has been complicated for some time, and is still quite controversial, with no end to the debate about "best practices" in sight).
stevea (2019-02-06 22:40:04+00:00): As I've said about the Stevenson forest, maybe natural=wood, maybe landcover=trees.  It's sort of ticklish.  But I don't think it's landuse=forest.
stevea (2019-02-06 23:52:26+00:00): It may be that the best thing is to examine what is meant by OSM's tenet of "don't tag for the renderer" and to ask yourself/ourselves why we wish for "wooded areas" (maybe forest, maybe wood, maybe trees) to be so tagged and/or so rendered.  It does seem to be part of the "more difficult, harder, chewier and maybe never-to-be-fully-answered" aspects of OSM.  Or even mapping, or how the human race thinks about landuse/landcover in these days of global warming, trees dying of drought, examinations of "must we really be tree stewards, as well?" (the answer seems to often be "yes, if we are good humans") and so on.  It is almost horribly complex, yet we find ourselves here simply as we attempt to be "good mappers."  It seems like a conundrum, yet it isn't, it just makes me stroke my chin in the habit of any good philosopher and steward of Planet Earth, as a human, its presently-dominant species.

Or, something like that.  And, 2/3 of Santa Cruz County is "covered with trees," so in a sense, "I know what you mean," as I imagine the UC Regents are not totally surprised to consider themselves/ourselves "foresters, as we must manage our trees."  It's easy to want a map we participate in to express "yeah, by the way, this area is dense with trees!" and UCSC is a wonderfully unique place of two thousand acres containing MANY trees. Where the lines exactly are is a crazy-wonderful fuzzy edge.  Often, I find it most useful for me to fully engage my "listening skills" and simply do that.

As you "agree with" a large segment of the East Field as natural=grassland, I think that tagging the "Stevenson wooded" area as natural=wood (rather than landuse=forest, as it sort of isn't more than it sort of is) I think we (me and many OSM volunteers included) might find ourselves in a kind of harmony.

It's a long, somewhat chewy, for-a-lot-of-different-reasons, complicated conversation.

I look forward to your further participation, response and good dialog.
stevea (2019-02-07 22:42:05+00:00): Changing this from landuse=forest to natural=wood, though it might be better to be deleted.
Wilmaps (2019-02-09 23:56:56+00:00): Nice to meet you Stevea! As you have noticed I  have recently stumbled upon OSM and found myself quite addicted. My eagerness to change things definitely got the better of me and it shows as I only have the basic knowledge provided by the intro tutorials. I will be spending much more of my time looking into the information and general guidance provided by the wiki and forums. 

I am very grateful for the general sentiment on tagging and general history/philosophy you have provided for the Santa Cruz area. As you have hypothesized I was labeling the wooded area "for the render". I feel now that it would be best to delete these areas I have created as they really are better tagged as university. While these tags are incorrect there certainly are areas on the campus that warrant the "wooded area" tag such as gulches and undeveloped upper campus. 
As of now, I don't feel confident in where those tags should start and end. Again many thanks for providing me with the general sentiment on the issue. I hope we can make the map that best represents the world around us! 
Cheers!
stevea (2019-02-11 19:38:11+00:00): Excellent.  The wiki and forum are excellent resources and allow a self-guided way to learn about OSM at your own pace in the directions that specifically interest you.

Yes, the usual "specificity of confusion" about treed, wooded, forested areas has to do with the differences between "land USE" and "land COVER."  OSM still has not fully resolved this and it remains an odd and difficult concept to explain the whole history of, especially to beginners.

As Santa Cruz (County) is 2/3 wooded, it makes things even more confusing, as many wish to explicitly show that something is wooded (or not, as with landuse=meadow) leading to some, uh, "interesting," (yet sometimes pretty, or "visually pleasing" areas, like Wilder Ranch State Park, where leisure=park is assumed to be wooded, except where a landuse=meadow means, "but not here").  The UCSC campus is much like that (the two of these do abut) where (except for Natural Reserves, which are also explicitly tagged as natural=wood) it seems to have "evolved around here" that "the UCSC campus is assumed to be natural=wood where the underlying "light yellow of university" shines through (unless there is landuse=meadow, like the Great Meadow or Mima Meadow).

As you can see, it's complicated, yet I believe your removal of these polygons (I have changed them from landuse=forest, clearly they are not, to natural=wood) is correct.  Otherwise, as you note, you'd be "chasing tagging wood" all over campus, and the exceptions to exceptions to "loose rules" would likely make everybody's head spin.

I'd be delighted if you were to remove these two (the Crown-9/10 one and the Stevenson-Cowell one) polygons.

In the future, I'm also delighted that there is another enthusiastic OSM volunteer around Santa Cruz willing to read wiki and do his or her best to contribute great data to our wonderful map.  Additionally, I offer you my firm commitment to do my best to answer any questions you might have, please simply "missive" me using OSM's built-in message system to stevea and I'll share with you the benefit of my knowledge, technical skills and sense of a decade of history in the project.

Happy mapping!

Steve
TheDutchMan13 (2019-01-26 05:09:43+00:00): This is changeset 66648758 fully uploaded. I accidently reloaded the page during the changeset upload.
TheDutchMan13 (2019-01-26 05:10:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648758
srflp (2019-01-26 14:53:03+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś tag leisure=track z toru saneczkowego?
Wg wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dtoboggan) tag sport=toboggan jest łączony z tagiem leisure=track i powszechną praktyką jest tagowanie torów saneczkowych obydwoma tymi tagami.
maraf24 (2019-01-27 13:04:40+00:00): Też mi się wydaje, że to jest powszechnie przyjęte rozwiązanie. 
Na pewno jest lepsze niż czasem spotykane railway=monorail.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-01-28 18:01:46+00:00): Bo to tagowanie pod render. Według https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dtrack jest dla tras wyścigowych.

Ale zachęcam do dyskusji na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:attraction%3Dsummer_toboggan
maraf24 (2019-01-29 12:09:07+00:00): Nic nie zabrania zrobienia sobie wyścigów na takim torze - kto uzyska najmniejszy czas, wygrywa.
mavl (2019-02-26 17:01:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-02-26 17:01:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
woodpeck (2019-02-03 11:01:58+00:00): Hello Kormi2003kutyA. Changeset comments are there so that other mappers can quickly and easily understand what your changes are about. You might find it a harmless joke to write everything back-to-front but it is an annoyance for others. Please don't do it.
Константин Гам (2019-07-18 16:07:42+00:00): Здесь ничего не начинали строить! Не вносите в карту бред!
saintam1 (2019-01-26 10:53:41+00:00): Hello, you deleted the street segment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/42.69154/23.31406 -- is there really neither a street nor a pedestrian passage here?
Corban8 (2019-02-11 16:22:05+00:00): Hello saintam1. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I must have deleted that section of road on accident when trying to delete just a small portion because it does not connect to the perpendicular road. I could not see any signs of a pedestrian path but I left it there anyways and made the appropriate changes. Thank you for your help and for pointing this out. I was also wondering if you could tell me if there is a place to talk to the local community in Bulgaria?
saintam1 (2019-02-11 16:23:46+00:00): Hey, thanks for looking into it.

Yes you can come and chat with us at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=57

Cheers!
mavl (2019-02-27 16:54:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
nevw (2019-01-26 10:47:49+00:00): Hi
you need to map your business over the building you operate from instead of placing it on the roadway centreline. I have shifted your edit to the neareast building and leave to you to re-locate over correct building.
chnav (2019-01-26 17:28:17+00:00): Пожалуйста не портите карту. Правка откачена.
mariotomo (2021-04-01 20:58:12+00:00): hi.  can you help again?  now it's the ways that don't close correctly.
gscholz (2021-04-02 06:20:06+00:00): Hi mariotomo,
there are hundreds of errors in this region but the relations seem to be OK. I have fixed some of the countles errors, but wich error are you refering to?
Guido
mariotomo (2021-04-02 14:30:51+00:00): Hi Guido! I was reviewing so randomly in the area, and I saw several way:landuse which don't close. but you're right, enough work even just limiting to relations. I'll see which osmose selection will highlight what I found so by chance.
mariotomo (2019-09-01 18:36:39+00:00): hola, te tengo una pregunta, es entre curiosidad e inquietud, lo estamos discutiendo en el grupo telegram de Panamá.  porqué estamos extendiendo las provincias en el mar?
mariotomo (2019-09-01 18:38:03+00:00): ops, Entschuldigung, hatte `de` nicht aufgemerkt.  in Panama we are wondering why the provinces extend into the sea.  you have any idea?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-26 08:47:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71627574 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
Commodoortje (2019-01-26 09:49:35+00:00): Inderdaad, volgens BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) wordt de school eronder op nummer 10 ook gesloopt. Is deze nog aanwezig?
Als deze ook gesloopt is dient ook de polygon met amenity=school te worden verwijderd.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226621282
.
Als er dan nieuwbouw komt, kun je een aanvraag doen in het forum. Aldaar worden nieuwbouw/verbouw/sloop verzoeken opgepakt, vanuit BAG geïmporteerd.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=735735#p735735
.
succes.
Commodoortje (2019-01-26 10:05:50+00:00): Zo te zien is de school op nr 10 inmiddels al gesloopt, en zijn er noodvoorzieningen voor de school. 
https://www.pzc.nl/walcheren/multifunctioneel-centrum-biggekerke-komt-nu-echt~ac3f010e/