piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:34:11+00:00): Hi,

This appears to be an import of Microsoft building footprints. Please note that imports must be discussed and documented prior to uploading, see https://wiki.osm.org/Import/Guidelines

Although the quality of these footprints are fine, this changeset adds tags to these buildings that aren't useful for OpenStreetMap. For example: 'FID', 'capture_da', and 'release' in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098579227

I ask that you revert this changeset and follow the import guidelines/fix errors I pointed out before reimporting. If you're not sure how to revert changes, read https://wiki.osm.org/Change_rollback
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:34:35+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
DressyPear4 (2022-10-01 10:07:23+00:00): Olá, não vejo a necessidade de usar a tag name, sendo que não vai aparecer na renderização e já está especificado na "descrição"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126744959
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:34:45+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
umapjpnic793 (2022-09-28 15:20:08+00:00): note : fixed already for Tokyo Metro lines, apparently it was misconnected with pedestrian crossing.
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:35:04+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:35:08+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:35:12+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
user_1566574 (2023-06-16 12:19:01+00:00): Hello !
Petite question : pourquoi layer=1 pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084925230 ?

Merci !
mapper03 (2022-09-30 23:48:15+00:00): please change this to proposed, this is not yet implemented nor being constructed by the government
DP24PH (2022-10-01 05:56:25+00:00): ALERT: For your next edit, kindly verify first if the concerned project is implemented or constructed before making such changes. Due to such complex project, this is considered as proposed as of time being. Your kind understanding is highly appreciated. Thank you very much.


DP24
ervinjoshuadelrosario (2026-05-26 17:15:44+00:00): Sorry for not responding. Yes. When an infrastructure is not yet built, I will map it first as proposed. Thank you and you're welcome.
user_5359 (2022-09-29 16:09:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on my correction of https://www.osm.org/way/6571824. I changed your "litYES" = "parc" to "lit" = "yes" (is there any meaning of the value parc?)
Jrachi (2022-09-29 13:56:47+00:00): Ciao Maria.
Hai creato una relazione per il sentiero di Bogone.
Però:
1) non è segnalato come hai scritto quindi il tag osmc_symbol non serve
2) non è parte del 220 
Insomma non ha molto senso fare una relazione. Suggerisco di cancellare la relazione mantenendo il sentiero.
Ivo
grawal (2022-09-29 14:07:05+00:00): Non mi pare sia il sentiero di Bogone. E' quello più a valle presso la località Aghieri. Inoltre il ponte non è mappato come bridge.
Walter
Jrachi (2022-09-29 14:37:55+00:00): Hai ragione Walter!
Però è anche peggio.
È stata creata una path che è sovraimpressa sulla footway precedente e sul ponte.
Correggo quello che riesco.
Lascia la relazione a Maria.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-30 23:27:18+00:00): why you created this road? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098593090
pedrito1414 (2023-01-31 08:01:59+00:00): Agree. I think this is a mistake. I will delete it.
eggie (2022-09-28 17:14:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip.. Je hoeft geen oneway=no toe te voegen aan reguliere wegen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
JoekeM (2022-09-28 19:58:19+00:00): Bedankt voor de tips!
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:35:16+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:35:23+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
Langlaeufer (2022-09-28 16:10:37+00:00): Hi sacky,

ich hab die Memeler Str. noch mit ein paar Übergegängen versehen, so wie ich das im Luftbild zu sehen glaube. Bitte schau mal drauf ob das so stimmt.

Grüße
Frank aka Langlaeufer
Hungerburg (2023-01-06 09:47:23+00:00): Are you certain, that anybody can drive their car there?

This track is signed vehicle=agricultural on the ground.

You removed or changed lots of other ground based access tags in the area. Do you have any local knowledge?
Map47 (2023-01-06 18:24:25+00:00): Served by a road that is not propitiously agricultural are a restaurant, a church, a castle, and a farm. I am reasonably convinced that patrons can access them with their own vehicles (motocar=destination).
Hungerburg (2023-01-06 19:15:44+00:00): Beware, 1) Destination includes guests. Did you mean Private? 2) There is not much sense in tagging a locked lift-gate as passable by anybodies' in a car.

You also invented a bridge and two fords in the area :) Nonsense has been reverted. No need for any actions on your side.
blackboxlogic (2023-12-18 21:03:23+00:00): Based on the text and image in the article you put as the commit message, Front Street doesn't seem correct. I think it still has parts that are one-way (going north). Are you local and can you get ground truth?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126747171
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2022-09-28 16:30:25+00:00): FYI, there is a tasking manager job for importing these buildings at https://tasks.openstreetmap.us/projects/228 . I bumped this job up to urgent status due to Ian's landfall.
highflyer74 (2022-10-18 20:55:42+00:00): Hallo nochmal!

Ich gucke mir alles morgen nochmal an, da ich gerade gesehen hatte, dass hier unnötige Relationen entstanden sind und diverse Dinge wie Website etc doppelt vorhanden sind.

Gute Nacht!
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:55:27+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126747745
ZLima12 (2022-09-28 23:48:13+00:00): Hi, and thanks for joining OSM!

Overall, this is a good edit. There's lots of stores that need to be added to the map.

There are a couple things I had to fix:
- It looks like you deleted a couple address points. These points are important, as they help people look up where an address is.
- It looks like you set a whole building to be named "Fratelli's Trattoria", though it includes other businesses too (e.g. the Black Cow).
- When entering the name of a place, the rule of thumb is to enter it exactly as the place displays it. As such, I changed the name you added from "10520 Burgers" to "105 Twenty Bar and Grill", as that is how they name themselves.

That aside, thanks for the good work! For every store you map, we get a little closer to being a viable alternative to some bigger map apps, when it comes to finding stores. OSM is relatively weak in comparison for this specific use.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126747806
Nielkrokodil (2025-02-01 20:56:05+00:00): Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098606202 ist ungewöhnlich. Fehlt dort vielleicht foot=no und bicycle=designated?
Falls es so stimmt: Gilt die EInbahn auch für Fußgänger?
Benoît C MdP (2022-09-29 07:46:46+00:00): Bonjour Mathieu,

Seul le tronçon entre Croix Nivert et Convention a été pérennisé. Le reste, c'est soit du provisoire en blanc, soit du jaune, soit en travaux.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
SekeRob (2022-09-28 16:37:25+00:00): Incl a motorway bridge extension from single element to 7 pier stretch across stream valley.
puma515 (2022-09-28 18:21:29+00:00): Moin, 
Am Flugplatz Aukrug gibt es kein Fitnisscenter. 
Habe den node gelöscht. 
Aber da beide Namen genutzt werden habe ich nun den Name Segelflugplatz Aukrug mit Adresse auf das Vereinsheim auf dem Flugplatzgelände neu erstellt. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149532279#map=17/54.06372/9.80213
tiptracks (2022-09-28 16:58:01+00:00): Hi GLB,

I do not understand your recent changes on this highway.

1. Why did you change the highway type from busway to service? This road is dedicated to public service buses and other motor vehicles are not allowed
2. "P+R Westlaren" is not the given name of this road (only bus stop). I suggest you remove it
eggie (2023-09-26 13:17:04+00:00): Hoi Jeroen,

Bij dit soort mutaties heb ik altijd m'n twijfels bij een startende mapper.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141772080#map=15/51.6568/4.4246&layers=N

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=141772080

Het is nu niet consistent getagd.. 
Een kant motorway Afslag  vanuit noord en link naar het noorden. 
Kun jij even kijken?

MVG
eggie
canfe (2022-09-29 07:03:43+00:00): No, non attribuire ad un'area residenziale il toponimo.
Per quello usa un singolo nodo e posizionalo, ovviamente, nel possibile "centro" tipo la piazza del paese o municipio se possibile.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126748937
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:35:45+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:35:48+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:35:51+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:35:55+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
archpdx (2022-09-29 16:35:59+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126744755
eggie (2022-09-28 18:58:02+00:00): Dag Camille...   Wat zegt foot=private hier?

Je mag er dan wel met motorvoertuigen , fietsen e.d ?
Maar niet te voet.

KIjk je nog even?
Is het niet gewoon access=private hier?
eggie
Camille van der Heide (2022-09-29 17:28:13+00:00): Hoi Eggie, Mee eens. Ik heb het zojuist aangepast naar Access=Private.

Groetjes,
Camille
ruugie (2022-09-28 17:32:12+00:00): You are not responsible for the bad data, but this CAN'T BE SOLVED without
a) fixing the geometry of
b) deleting
this bad lake.
VLD190 (2022-10-03 17:03:00+00:00): Hi user @ruugie,

I went ahead and adjusted the geometry of the lake, per changeset 126749941. Please note that I did not create the lake nor the surrounding lakes in the nearby area.
E de Wit (2022-09-29 10:29:10+00:00): @DWG there's quite a bit of damage that requires reverting from this user that seems to have a history of vandalizing the map

-E de Wit
eggie (2022-09-28 19:05:33+00:00): Hi Buzy.. 
Welcome to OSM. 
Two restaurants in one building?
Please have a look again. 

Greetz,
eggie
BuzyBee56 (2022-09-28 19:29:29+00:00): Hi, new to all this. Can't see where I went wrong
eggie (2022-09-28 19:37:32+00:00): No problem.. I removed the former restaurant https://restaurantharmsen.nl/
It's moved to Weesp.
Greetz,
eggie
Sheila Job (2022-09-29 18:03:57+00:00): Hello, I just squared this building. but i notice that the same building is at three chabgesets, Changeset: 126751781, Changeset: 126751828, Changeset: 126751729 this all have the same buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126750763
Palolo (2022-12-28 20:21:24+00:00): It appears that you traced the T19 road with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098637178
The way does not have a tag and should be removed please.
Nakaner (2022-09-29 09:49:04+00:00): Hallo,

bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097828386/history hast du das segregated=yes an einem Weg ohne Radfahrerlaubnis übrig gelassen. Magst du das noch korrigieren oder hast du da ein Hybrid aus reinem Gehweg und getrenntem sonstigem Radweg gefunden? ;-)

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126751201
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2022-09-29 10:32:26+00:00): Oops, mir fiel gestern nur das oneway als übrig gebliebener Fehler auf und das fehlende des. ein Stück weiter.
Ja, ist ein ziemlich komischer Weg da, hatte ich mir nach einer Disk. bei ka-news genauer angeschaut, auf dem Abschnitt nix mehr von Radweg übrig, im weiteren Verlauf Fragmente, die man nach § 2 (4) III als sonst. Radweg interpretieren kann ... Vmtl. ungewollte Überbleibsel, aber vor der Kreuzung Tullastr. mündet ja auch noch ein "Gehweg, Schleichradler frei" aus der Anlage ein ... Das Tagging ist ein Kompromiss ... Rechtstheoretisch echt sehenswert der Weg, falls Du mal zufällig in der Nähe bist ... ;-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-16 18:23:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358627253/history - you marked this building as demolished

is this toilet still operating?
Mike Krüger (2025-03-19 14:35:22+00:00):  This toilet does not exist anymore.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-20 18:16:21+00:00): then https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/358627253/history should be edited - you deleted info that there is a building there but this object describes operating toilet (via amenity=toilets tag)
os-emmer (2025-03-24 16:56:57+00:00): Hi Mike Krüger and thank you for your support. I checked the surrounding area and found 294 similar objects. I didn't check all of them but it seems you edited them:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/20Y0
Is it right that these toilets do not exist anymore and that the buildings there got completly demolished?

We are trying to improve the data for this camp. There is a discussion in the forum about this. Maybe you want to join.

Thank you in advance.
Mike Krüger (2025-05-15 13:11:19+00:00): Hello. I don't think the camp is like it was at the beginning. It would be best to take a more recent aerial photo for corrections.
gscscnd (2022-09-29 06:28:10+00:00): <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229910872>, <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504829493>, <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098641733> — na pewno miało być highway=cycleway, nie highway=path? <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442555705> — czy foot i segregated nie są zbędne?
Tomasz Herud (2022-09-29 07:11:22+00:00): Ad1. Patrząc na predefiniowany propozycje z edytora webowego, to żadna nie pasuje w 100%, bo albo traktuje to jako przejście albo jako przejazd, ale żadna jako oba.

Ad2. To śmieci pozostałe z wcześniejszego (błędnego) tagowania. Poprawiłem.
gscscnd (2022-09-29 07:26:00+00:00): crossing=* na drodze jest średnio potrzebne, IMHO wręcz nie powinno być stosowane gdy mamy już crossing=* na węźle (np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1827073512). Szablony w iD nie są idealne, nie każdy przypadek do nich da się dopasować.
Tomasz Herud (2022-09-29 08:57:57+00:00): Czytam sobie teraz jeszcze Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing) i tam jest jeszcze inaczej :/

PS Czy taki zestaw tagów, będzie Twoim zdaniem dobry dla tych przejścio-przejazdów?
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
segregated=yes
gscscnd (2022-09-29 09:33:55+00:00): Tak, tzn. nie ma specjalnej różnicy w tagowaniu pomiędzy drogą dla rowerów z równoległa drogą dla pieszych (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_universal_tag) wzdłuż ulicy czy na przejściu/przejeździe. Gdyby to był sam chodnik (highway=footway), to należałoby odpowiednio dodać footway=sidewalk lub footway=crossing. Do highway=path też się to czasem dodaje, jak kto uważa.

Dodawanie crossing=* na segmentach chodnika przechodzących przez przejścia to relatywnie nowy pomysł iD, moim zdaniem (i nie tylko: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing#Tagging_crossings_as_ways) nienajlepszy. Ale to iD, więc i dobre, i złe pomysły bardzo szybko i skutecznie do OSM się wprowadzą.
Tomasz Herud (2022-09-29 11:43:04+00:00): Zmieniłem tagowanie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126776499#map=17/50.08971/18.25767
rarad74 (2022-09-28 19:10:32+00:00): Salut. Ai fost acolo, sau ai un track gpx inregistrat? Vad ca din imagini pare mai vizibil circulata portiunea pe care ai transofrmat-o tu in path decat cea de langa care ocoleste mai mult si ai tranformat-o in track.
ted3sco (2022-09-28 20:11:12+00:00): Salut. Da, am inregistrat trackul in OSMAND, dar mai dureaza ceva timp pana o sa am acces la laptopul personal sa-l pot pune exact. E trasat aproximativ cu ce am pe telefon. Fostul drum acum se excaveaza. Nu inteleg exact ce vor sa faca fiindca mutau pamantul mai sus.
Noul traseu e mult mai bun si mai lat ca vechiul traseu. Se poate urca lejer cu orice masina.
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:54:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next point:
* A few overlapping buildings drawn.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126751823
CorruptComputer (2022-09-30 15:49:24+00:00): Looks good, thank you for your contributions!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126751876
gscholz (2022-09-29 08:07:50+00:00): Hi MrKothy,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=20.57159&lat=40.17414&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126751962

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Andrea Musuruane (2023-03-27 14:58:37+00:00): Ciao. Perdonami, ma questa strada dov'è? Non vedo alcun cartello e sembra si entri dal civico 3: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3560133900940530 Grazie, Andrea
ivanbranco (2023-03-27 15:29:51+00:00): È proprio quella, infatti è taggata come service private. Effettivamente insieme a "Corso" Argentina (poco a nord) avrei potuto taggarle come old_name. Un altro caso di via senza cartello è Via America, però questa a differenza delle precedenti è pubblica. La mia fonte erano libri su Vercelli ma se non ricordo male tutti e tre i nomi appaiono anche su documenti del comune di Vercelli.
Andrea Musuruane (2023-03-27 15:58:35+00:00): Sulla Carta Tecnica Comunale questi nomi non sono segnati. Lo stradario non lo trovo. Qui (non so quanto sia aggiornato), ce ne sono 2 su 3: https://www.comune.vercelli.it/anagrafe-servizi-civici/elettorale/ripartizione-del-territorio
Jrachi (2022-09-29 14:00:53+00:00): Ciao Andrea.
Vedo che hai modificato il teg network da rwn a lwn
Però si tratta di un itinerario registrato in regione con importanza regionale.
Non sono sicuro al 100% ma mi sembra più corretto rwn.
Ivo
Andrea Del Sarto (2022-09-29 14:10:46+00:00): Ciao Ivo,
la relazione padre è rimasta rwn, le singole tappe forse è più logico che siano lwn, nell'ottica del tag network. le singole tappe hanno più una logica locale che regionale, il percorso nella sua interezza rimane di importanza regionale.
non credi?
Jrachi (2022-09-29 14:34:42+00:00): Hai ragione mi era sfuggito!
Tra ieri ed oggi ho fatto diversi cazziatoni ad altrettanti menestrelli neofiti.
Frans S (2022-10-25 12:10:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.


How to map tall buildings. These needs to be mapped over the rooflines and moved to its ground plan. See point 9 on attached document.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126752862
Nakaner (2022-09-29 09:47:26+00:00): Hallo,

ist die Tür zugemauert worden oder warum hast du den Eingang gelöscht?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126753001
bastko (2022-09-29 15:48:40+00:00): Hallo Michael,

es gibt zu jedem Atelier eine eigene Einganstüre. Da bisher nur Fablab e.V. eingetragen war, war die Tür zu deren Räumen richtig, jetzt wäre es aber irreführend. Fablab ist ja umgezogen. Sie sind jetzt neben Fettschmelze und haben schon einen neuen Eintrag.

Gibt es eigentlich ein Symbol für Atelier oder Werkstatt - und wie kann man es aufrufen?

Viele Grüße

Benno
adrianojbr (2022-10-01 13:32:29+00:00): Olá, Sname!

Por que você está apagando os números de casa nos endereços?

O da JP Performance, por exemplo, estava correto conforme o site da empresa: https://www.jpperformance.com.br/
eggie (2022-09-28 19:32:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
adrianojbr (2022-09-28 19:50:08+00:00): Olá, Sname!

Por que você está apagando os números das casas?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126753438
Stereo (2022-09-30 22:36:39+00:00): Hi Piona! Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and congratulations on your first edit.

Happy mapping,

Guillaume
eggie (2022-09-28 20:17:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip.. Kijk in de wiki hoe een winkel toe te voegen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
Gebruik ook als het kan de bestaande adresnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
habi (2022-12-05 09:55:13+00:00): Ciao Lindsey
You've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098657146/ to the map (with wrong tags, but that's not the issue).
There is nothing visible on aerial imagery, has the building been built recently?

Also it would be good to add *rectangular* buildings, you can do this by pressing 'Q' on your keyboard after having drawn the building.

Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
Kai Johnson (2023-08-01 18:03:45+00:00): Some time back in changeset 102871214, you added an  lgbt_friendly=no tag to this pub, now changed to lgbtq=no. The guidance on the Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lgbtq) suggests not to use tags of this type. Was there a verifiable source you used to determine that this tag was appropriate?
Firefishy (2023-08-01 21:58:59+00:00): Good call: I have removed the tag in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139319954

This used to be our after work local around 2016 until the owner became very unfriendly to some of our team. Cannot be directly verified.

Recently a new generation is taking over the pub (for the better): https://www.willhawkes.net/blog/2023/1/23/januarynewsletter
Kai Johnson (2023-08-02 21:02:22+00:00): Ah. I'm sorry to hear that happened. Thanks for correcting the tag. Let's hope that the pub is now friendlier to everyone, especially since it seems to have a good selection of ales! Cheers!
os-emmer (2024-08-31 08:12:11+00:00): Hallo Mike Krüger,
du hast hier anscheinend einige Toiletten und Küchen als demolished:building=* gekennzeichnet. Diese haben teilweise fragwürdige tags wie operator=inactive.
Existieren diese Toiletten und Küchen noch? Oder sind die komplett verschwunden?
archpdx (2023-02-22 03:06:44+00:00): Please note that the name field shouldn't be used to describe features in OSM. If a road doesn't have a name, the name field should be left blank and the tag `noname=yes` should be added (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#No_name)