piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2019-03-30 07:53:39+00:00): Hi interdite,

I'm sure. The problem is the rendering. A building renders always on top of the landuse. That looks funny. 
We are trying to solve that renderingproblem. All buildings are imported from the Dutch Kadaster. It's all messured. A speacial team updates the buildings frequently. 
You may also look at the data from the Dutch Kadaster. It's the same data.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=amster&resultOffset=0&objectId=3594&geometry.x=122131.364&geometry.y=487394.738&zoomlevel=2&detailsObjectId=3594
Gr Eggie
MKnight (2021-08-18 09:02:40+00:00): Sure that for example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333427875 have 22 building:levels somewhere in layer=-1?
eggie (2021-08-18 09:32:29+00:00): Hi MKnight,

That's some time ago..

I merged the additional buildinginfo with BAG building.. removed layer-1 in your example.
Other mappers added additional info at duplicated buildings (not BAG import) or added building:part.

and by the way .. I noticed this message

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3541
Greetz en thanks for the hint,
eggie
MKnight (2021-08-18 12:45:08+00:00): Thx for Feedback.

There is a discussion in the german forum for that too:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73586
eggie (2021-08-18 12:59:59+00:00): Thanks for the link to the German forum.
The duplicated buildings I merged were no import from the Dutch Kadaster.
The underground building south east are BAG import.
There are more solutions and a lot of discusion how to handle this.
I understand SmoothFiets will have a look.
The problem is ofcourse the rendering.
Sometimes I use buiding:part=...   in stead of building.
Effect.. no rendering. 

Greetz,
eggie
PT-53 (2019-03-30 07:03:56+00:00): Hallo ckr,
in diesem Änderungssatz hast Du Waldwege von track auf service "höhergestuft". Bist Du Dir da sicher? Nur weil ein Weg geteert ist, wird daraus noch keine "Straße". Entscheidend ist die tatsächliche Verkehrsbedeutung.
Fragende Grüße
ckr (2019-04-04 18:20:29+00:00): Hallo,

ja, da bin ich mir sicher: Zufahrtsstraßen zum Kieswerk.

Erklärende Grüße...?!.
PT-53 (2019-04-05 06:32:50+00:00): Hallo ckr, 
dann ist das ja so korrekt.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-03-30 06:53:50+00:00): Hallo ckr,
Du hast bei diesem neuen Waldweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680431124#map=17/47.98119/9.48555  access=no + motor_vehicle=permessive + bicycle=yes eingetragen. Danach wären ausgerechnet Fußgänger verboten. Das wird so wohl nicht stimmen.
Welche Verkehrszeichen stehen denn dort?
Schau Dir mal das Verkehrszeichen-Tool (http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/) an. Damit kannst Du sicher die korrekten Eingaben für die Zugangsbeschränkungen ermitteln.
Bitte beachte auch, daß mit jeder Straßen- bzw. Wegeart bereits bestimmte Nutzungsberechtigungen bzw. -beschränkungen als Standartwert verbunden sind. Diese kannst Du hier nachschauen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany
Diese Standartwerte brauchen und sollen nicht extra eingetragen werden, nur die Abweichungen davon.

Bei diesem Wegstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680431125#map=17/47.98343/9.48723 sind ebenfalls unwahrscheinliche Nutzungsberechtigungen eingetragen. Außerdem hast Du den Weg mit tracktype=grade1 (Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype) markiert. Das dürfte wohl ein Versehen sei, da das Wegstück nur mit Wegen verbunden ist, die nicht "geteert" sind.

Schaust Du Dir Deine Eingaben nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße
maraf24 (2019-04-19 08:28:26+00:00): Fałszywy park - wycofane.
mcld (2019-08-07 20:07:57+00:00): Some of these, e.g. Raventhorpe 352173386, could do with re-tagging as power=plant with PV areas contained within
itsfreetux (2019-03-31 10:19:12+00:00): سلام دوست گرامی باید به عرضتون برسونم که ثبت موارد شخصی مثل خانه ننه اینا در نقشه کار درستی نیست امیدوارم ادیت های خوبی روی نقشه کرمانشاه از شما ببینم ضمنا تو تلگرام اگه با من تماس بگیرید میتونم بیشتر راهنمایی کنم آیدی من freetux
Carto'Cité (2019-04-07 16:58:56+00:00): Bonjour Clément,
Tu as ajouté oneway:bicycle=yes sur la Rue Riboutté en laissant cycleway=opposite ce qui ne serait pas compatible il me semble. Tu cites aussi un arrêté pour le justifier ; est-ce que tu sais si sur le terrain en pratique le double sens cyclable n'existe pas/plus ?
Merci d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Clement R (2019-04-08 10:55:24+00:00): En théorie ce dsc n'existe pas, il n'y a d'ailleurs pas de picto vélo au sol. Mais il est vrai qu'un panneau sauf vélo est présent, bizarrement à gauche de la voie. Avec l'inversion de sens de la rue bleue ils ont visiblement déplacé le panneau sauf velo sur la rue Riboutté.
Carto'Cité (2019-04-08 11:33:36+00:00): Merci pour ton retour.
Je suis allé jeter un coup d'œil sur les « photos ». Il y a bien un "sauf vélo" qui en ferait bien un DSC sur le terrain (en plus en zone 30). Qu'est-ce qui selon toi justifierait de ne pas le décrire comme un DSC ?
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Clement R (2019-04-08 11:41:42+00:00): En soit, rien, le panneau est là. En revanche la gestion de la sortie n'existe pas. Pas d'interdiction de tourner à gauche, et priorité à droite pas très explicite, et non compatible avec les habituels aménagements parisiens. Je pense qu'il s'agit d'une erreur de panneau, mais les panneaux priment dans osm.
Clement R (2019-04-08 11:46:55+00:00): Et pas de marquage au sol. Il se pourrait que le panneau disparaisse un jour ou l'autre. Je pense que l'info devrait rester au moins dans les notes.
Carto'Cité (2019-04-08 12:22:07+00:00): Merci encore pour ton retour. Quand je roule à Paris je rencontre d'autres cas de genre, où il n'y a que le sauf vélo en entrée puis plus rien et c'est vrai que c'est assez compliqué dans ces rues et en sortie. C'est là qu'une distinction opposite_shared_lane pourrait compléter la simple opposite mais en ce moment c'est déjà un peu le bazar dans les discussion sur le sujet que je voudrais pas trop m'aventurer.
Carto'Cité (2019-04-08 12:22:19+00:00): Ça marche. Ça te va si je supprime le oneway:bicyle=yes ?
Clement R (2019-04-08 12:29:59+00:00): Pas de problème, mais je pense qu'il est intéressant de garder une note sur l'interdiction par arrêté
literan (2019-04-20 13:40:10+00:00): не понимаю, зачем вы наделали secondary-изолятов. Для красоты? Верну как было, в соответствии с фактической значимостью в транспортной сети
Frans S (2019-04-03 17:31:40+00:00): Hi Wim.  Thanks for mapping here. A remark. Please check this wiki (again) how to tag highways in east Africe.   A residential road here is not correct.
Best regards
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
azakh-world (2019-04-07 21:17:39+00:00): Hello.
You've created a way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680443650 which is duplicate of existing "railway=station+station=subway" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3148750837
It violates the "one feature on ground - one OSM object" and brings uncertainty.
If you see the need to replace a node with an area, please leave one of them, in particular there must be only one station in stop_area relation.
BCNorwich (2019-03-30 07:08:31+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Potten End, the school name and details are on the school grounds outline as per OSM practice. Placing it on the building as well is just unnecessary duplication so I've removed it. The same applies to Ashlyns School.

Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool

Regards Bernard.
Charles IV (2019-03-30 11:12:02+00:00): Thank you for correcting this.
I was not aware of these practices, and when creating the new buildings, I cross-checked with the existing buildings, which were named, presumably incorrectly.
BCNorwich (2019-03-30 09:15:08+00:00): Hi, has the slipway actually been removed?

Regards Bernard.
JDPELL88 (2019-03-30 09:17:40+00:00): No, it hasn't. But I did notice it wasnt in the right spot on the aerial photos and had intended to relocate it in its proper position. However, me being new to this still, couldn't quite figure it out! I intend to re-add the slip way in its correct position.

Kind regards

Joe
BCNorwich (2019-03-30 09:59:57+00:00): Hi, Thanks for responding. It's OSM practice when features change or need moving/adjusting to amend the original mapped feature. Thus the full history of the mapped feature is kept. Deleting a feature remove all history related to that feature.

Reverting changesets is difficult for new mappers and likely to make further problems.
So I've reverted this changeset for you and then moved the original slipway, (adjusting joining features to suit). I kept the change you made to The Nettles area.

I hope this is OK, there's a lot to learn about mapping in OSM. If you need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard,
JDPELL88 (2019-03-30 10:02:06+00:00): All good. Thank you for that. Lots to learn and I'm sure I'll get the hang of it all quickly!

Thanks again. All the best.
BCNorwich (2019-03-30 07:20:34+00:00): Hi, it is OSM practice to amend the existing way if changes are needed rather than delete and redraw. Thus the complete history of the way is retained. So I have reverted your deletion and redrawing (reinstated the history), then made your amendment to the existing way. 

Regards Bernard.
Charles IV (2019-03-30 11:03:32+00:00): Apologies, I think I accidentally dragged the path while trying to amend it, and forgot about the undo button.

Thank you for correcting it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-29 23:12:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68682087 where the changeset comment is: Reverting renaming of a park, seemingly for advertising purposes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2628
archie (2021-12-22 20:13:07+00:00): Hej, finns det någon chans att övertala dig om att rätta till en besvärande offset? Den här vägen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575651030) och saker däromkring som du har ritat in har en kraftig offset. Med hjälp av JOSMs "måttband" kommer man fram till att offseten för vägen är nästan 11 meter! Vore kanon om du kunde rätta till det. Tack på förhand. 
PS. jag har även i andra sammanhang noterat att saker som du ritat in har en viss imagery offset, visserligen inte så kraftig som här men ändå. Därför min fråga; du vet väl att du måste justera bildbakgrunden (satellitbilden) för att få bort offseten innan du börjar rita? Kolla in här: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-29 23:03:51+00:00): Hi Dingo1411,

Thank you for your first contribution to OSM :)

Having a look, this feature already exists as a single area on the map - is there a reason two additional areas need to be created for the park?

I see that you've added descriptions to both areas stating what is there, but this can also be achieved by adding tagged areas (such as the existing pitches and ponds) to the park.

Additionally, your new areas cover several houses outside of the park, is this intentional?

If you need any help, please don't hesitate to ask :)
Dingo1411 (2019-03-30 02:40:55+00:00): I couldn't figure out how to do the park in one piece. I didn't mean to get the houses in the drawing. If it was already drawn, my addition can be deleted.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-30 11:53:42+00:00): Sure, no problem, I'll revert your change for you. For your info, the original park is here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/661348890/ , it was added three months ago and seems fine :).
dgitto (2020-11-05 13:05:34+00:00): Non sembra possibile che attualmente Via Alessandria sia access=no. Dico bene?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-29 23:12:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 68681187.
monotar (2021-09-30 22:08:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136704946/history bitte mal bei sowas aufpassen. Es ist der absolute Zufall dass ich das gefunden habe. Der Edit ist schon irgendwo überflüssig aber der Fehler trotzdem gewaltig wenn das ein Router wirklich zu 100% beachtet!
JochenB (2021-09-30 22:57:08+00:00): Halllo Monotar,

Ich habe keine Ahnung was du mir mit deinen etwas ruppigen Worten sagen willst. 

Der Weg ist eine asphaltierte Feldzufahrt, sehr schön auf dem aktuellen sächsischen Luftbild zu sehen. Genau als das ist es getaggt.

Viele Grüße,
Jochen
monotar (2021-09-30 22:59:19+00:00): foot=designated. Was ist mit dem Rad dann?
JochenB (2021-09-30 23:11:54+00:00): Rad ist auf track laut Waldgesetz eh' zugelassen. 'hw=track' hat also 'bicycle=yes' implizit. Insofern hat es auf den Router keine Auswirkung ob das dransteht oder nicht. 

Wenn da ein Rad- &Gehwegschild stände könnte man das 'bicycle=designated' hinzufügen, was das Wegstück in Rad-Routern etwas aufwerten würde. Wegen der Kürze des Weges hätte das aber sicher keine praktische Auswirkung.

Allerdings steht da laut Mappilary kein Rad- & Gehwegschild, so dass 'bicycle=designated' nicht korrekt wäre und das 'foot=designated' eigentlich auch weg müsste.
monotar (2021-09-30 23:17:23+00:00): wenn man foot=designated mappt wird die Implizierung für bicycle=yes aufgehoben da Router von einer exklusiven Nutzung ausgehen. Und ja, dass foot=designated muss dann weg, darauf wollte ich dich ja hinweisen wenn Router dann wen Weg sperren kommt man nämlich nicht mehr auf "Am Wasserwerk"
JochenB (2021-09-30 23:44:04+00:00): Ah, wieder was dazugelernt.
JochenB (2021-09-30 23:50:10+00:00): Habs grad probiert, GraphHopper , OSMRM, OSMAND und Naviki haben mit dem Wegstück keine Probleme. Da sind die wahrscheinlich fehlertolerant.
monotar (2021-09-30 23:56:47+00:00): wie gesagt, kurze Strecken sind kein Problem (auch wegen Treppen usw.) aber bei langen habe ich schon Probleme gesehen, aber die Stelle gibts nicht mehr. Mit dem designated könnte man ja auch durchaus einen "Deutschland-Router" bauen, da es in Deutschland anders ist. Dass jemand Fußwege mit bicycle=no taggt ist ja eher selten, aber trotzdem müssen die Wege vom Router gemieden werden.
JochenB (2021-10-01 23:16:01+00:00): ich hab da foot=... rausgenommen, gab noch andere Verbindungen, wo das auch so war.
Frans S (2019-04-04 12:29:06+00:00): Hello.  Thanks for mapping.  A request.
Please square all rectangular buildings with the S key in iD editor after mapping each one.
Best regards and keep mapping
Kenairod (2020-01-23 15:37:14+00:00): Salut,
Je viens de voir que tu as ajouté ce point au milieu du pâté de maison, il est vraiment là ?
Si c'est le cas, je me dis qu'on pourrait peut-être ajouter l'adresse par laquelle on peut y accéder ?
Bonne journée !
Dorian
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-06-11 00:46:14+00:00): the correct action should be to delete the road not create a restriction, because it doesnt exist anymore, so I did it, thank you.
abakus_uploader (2019-03-30 23:30:58+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2019-03-30 23:30:59+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Sosha1996 (2019-04-01 11:24:24+00:00): برادر این دایرش زیادی بزرگ بود، کوچیک‌ترش کردم:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680460401
viloan (2019-03-30 00:41:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-03-30 00:45:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-03-30 00:50:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-03-30 00:50:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-03-30 00:56:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
jo_yo (2019-04-30 04:16:12+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. Look for existing features before adding a new one. Igbogbo-Ebute Road was already mapped so it would be better to change the surface and max speed there. Also try to zoom in, as sometimes things are hidden when zoomed out.
viloan (2019-03-30 01:02:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Frans S (2019-04-04 12:10:35+00:00): Hello
 Thanks for mapping here.
Please check the Highway wiki how to map highways in East Africa the tag residential is restricted to urban areas.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot/West_African_HOT_Mapping_Tips

Thanks and keep mapping
archie (2019-03-30 08:35:34+00:00): STOP this! Your vandalism is being observed by lokal, swedish osm editors. Your changesets will be reversed. OBS den här personen ägnar sig åt ganska omfattande förstörelse i "Kungalv". Han har ingen som helst lokal kännedom. Bl a gör han om gator inne i Kungälv till primary, gör enskilda avsnitt i vägnät som är enkelriktade t dubbelriktade m m.
traveleditor (2019-03-31 09:50:54+00:00): :(  i not do wrong thing, i know anywere else Kungalv. I not have swedish keyboard. I AM SUPER IN OSM EDITOR!
traveleditor (2019-03-31 09:54:22+00:00): İ CRY.