piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
TheSwavu (2020-04-30 08:01:03+00:00): That's how admin boundaries have been tagged in Australia. It classifies what type place entity the boundary represents.

If you want to ask more I'd suggest an email to the talk-au mail list.
Sanniu (2017-06-29 07:14:06+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155117799, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404224335 - is it roundabout?
sivan00 (2017-06-29 07:19:02+00:00): No, it is not.
Sanniu (2017-06-29 07:20:19+00:00): both?
sivan00 (2017-06-29 07:20:42+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155117799 is a roundabout.
Sanniu (2017-06-29 07:22:20+00:00): R U sure? I rather bet that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404224335 is.
sivan00 (2017-06-29 07:24:40+00:00): Sorry, you are correct http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404224335 is a roundabout.
Sanniu (2017-06-29 07:26:07+00:00): ok, fixed, thx
richlv (2016-03-18 06:26:32+00:00): thanks for the update - but what happened with the previous road ?
notice how the new road now overlaps with the southern part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292102086
Dwoex (2016-03-18 07:48:22+00:00): They had built this in Sep 2015. I visited Latvia in Jan 2016 and rode the bike on it. Suprisely, it doesn.t have proper finishing on the north end. Some pics of the road are here http://www.velo36.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=12772&p=251631#p251631
apm-wa (2016-05-10 01:52:50+00:00): Это не гостиница Лачын.  This is not the Hotel Laçyn.
MKnight (2016-03-20 08:13:37+00:00): Hier ist irgendwas schiefgelaufen, etliche Gebäude sind doppelt hochgeladen.
FahRadler (2016-03-22 12:23:02+00:00): ja, du hast recht, seltsam, das ist bei Josem eigentlich gar nicht möglich.
Ich kümmere mich darum.
Kann aber ein bisschen dauern.
FahRadler (2016-03-22 12:46:25+00:00): beim Hochladen hat josm abgebrochen, beim erneuten hochladen vier Konflikte gemeldet - nach dem lösen dieser gings.

Kennst du evtl eine Overpass Query mit der man so was selektieren kann?
Es dürften zu 99% buildings sein.
MKnight (2016-03-22 15:10:23+00:00): overpass wüsste ich jetzt nichts, was nur ein Gebäude selektiert. Was evtl. ginge, wäre nach Uhrzeit zu laden, http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/fbs gibt aber leider nix aus, keinen Plan warum

Ich würde an deiner Stelle so vorgehen:
Revert vom CS
STRG+Z (revertieren rückgängig)
STRG+F -> building
Validieren
Manuell die Gebäude löschen
Nakaner (2016-03-22 16:06:17+00:00): Wenn der JOSM-Upload abbricht und man ihn erneut hochlädt, ist es normal, dass neu angelegte Objekte ein zweites Mal hochgeladen werden. Da JOSM zu dem Zeitpunkt noch keine ID für diese Objekte bekannt ist, nimmt er an, dass diese noch nicht auf dem Server existieren und ruft erneut CREATE auf.
FahRadler (2016-03-30 13:57:52+00:00): Ich hab mal ein wenig Zeit investiert.
Über Overpass finde ich wenigstens doppelte nodes.
--------------------------
[bbox:{{bbox}}];
node;
foreach->.a(
    node(around.a:0)->.b;
    (.b; - .a);
    out;
);
----------------------
Wenn dann vier direkt beieinanderliegen war noch ein building doppelt.
Leider berücksichtigt das noch von ways gemeinsam genutzte nodes.

Gibts irgendeine offiziele Vorgehensweise wie bei Hochlade - Abbrüchen zu verfahren ist?
MKnight (2016-03-30 17:45:36+00:00): Vielleicht sinnvoll da mal im Forum dazu zu fragen, hier lesen ja doch nur 3-4 Hanseln.

Wie oben gesagt, ich halte ein pseudorevert für am sinnvollsten, ist dann zwar manuell einiges zu löschen, dafür sieht man auch false positive besser, als wenn man via overpass stumpf löscht
adjuva (2018-08-15 01:02:08+00:00): Hallo Bahnpirat!

Du hast 2010 beim Gleichrichterwerk Friedrichstraße (Way 43174768) als Betreiber die BVG und als versorgte Bahn die U-Bahn eingetragen. Gleichzeitig führt durch das Gebäude ein 30-kV-Kabel der S-Bahn.

Nach 

http://www.industriekultur.berlin/web/medien/pdfs/industriekultur_stromnetz_s_bahn_1496046477/industriekultur_stromnetz_s_bahn.pdf

ist das aber ein S-Bahn-Gleichrichterwerkt. Ein Versehen? Besseres Wissen?

Schö
  Adjuva
Nakaner (2016-03-17 17:17:51+00:00): Was möchtest du uns denn mit diesem Node sagen? :-)

naptan:CommonName=* ist ein Tag des NAPTAN-Imports in Großbritannien. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN

webs=* scheint mir ein Tippfehler zu sein, add:level=* auch.

Was dem Unternehmen fehlt, ist das Tag office=it.
vv01f (2016-03-17 17:34:39+00:00): Ich hatte nur die Autovervollständigung für eine Firma genutzt, die ich hier nicht direkt fand; danke für die Hinweise.
naoliv (2016-03-17 13:13:20+00:00): Jocimara, como exatamente será esse curso de cartografia? Qual vai ser o público alvo?
Você não quer entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira para conversar sobre isso e tirar dúvidas?
Nessa sua edição de teste, por exemplo, tem alguns detalhes que poderiam ser melhorados.
Temos várias formas de contato, caso você tenha interesse http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Jocimara (2016-03-17 13:18:43+00:00): Olá, 
Esse curso para capacitação de professores da rede pública no município de Lençóis. Estou buscando aprender a ferramenta. Toda ajuda será bem vinda.
Jacek Placek (2016-03-25 14:49:48+00:00): To jest ogólnodostępna droga asfaltowa
stefangl (2016-03-25 16:39:14+00:00): Ta droga od zawsze była własnością Nadleśnictwa Lubniewice, a to, że ludzie dojeżdżają nią do OW "Pod Basztą" nie oznacza, że jest ona ogólnodostępna.
Nigdy też nie nazywała się ona Sosnowa.
DD1GJ (2016-03-20 08:00:04+00:00): Hausnummern wurden wg. inkompatibler Liegenschaftskarte nach Rücksprache zurückgesetzt, siehe CS 37950976
mueschel (2016-03-18 10:54:36+00:00): Hallo Blacky,
die Öffnungszeiten können in einem Key zusammengefasst werden, ich habe das gerade geändert:
opening_hours = Mo-Fr 08:00–18:00;Sa 08:00-16:00;Su 10:00-13:00

Aber ist das hier wirklich ein Supermarkt oder nicht eher ein shop=garden_centre ?
Gruß, Jan
BeKri (2016-03-17 16:36:56+00:00): A geh hörst, dös is jetzt aber ned nett, das Du dös Tagging vom Mentz durchanand bringst ;-))

Und weil wir kurz vor Ostern sind: ganz in der Nähe sind noch 3 EntranceEasterEggs ...
Und wenn Du schon dabei bist: Mach doch mal nen Overpass (i bin z'bläd dafür) für entrance=yes + Entrance sitzt nicht auf einer Buildingkante und gugst Du ... 
Das dürfte inzwischen an jeder S-Bahnstation in München auf den von Mentz gewünschten Zugängen hängen,
dito das umstittene entrance:light = yes
Grossraum München 681 Nodes ... Und nu ???
bopoh13 (2018-08-01 12:35:06+00:00): Для просеки есть отдельный тег https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:man_made%3Dcutline
d1g (2016-06-13 20:44:12+00:00): Привет! 

По снимку здесь два ряда заборов:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329101495
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283056137

так как http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404247225 - дорога проходит через них?
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
DD1GJ (2016-03-20 07:59:32+00:00): Hausnummern wurden wg. inkompatibler Liegenschaftskarte nach Rücksprache zurückgesetzt, siehe CS 37950976
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
DD1GJ (2016-03-20 07:59:17+00:00): Hausnummern wurden wg. inkompatibler Liegenschaftskarte nach Rücksprache zurückgesetzt, siehe CS 37950976
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Hjart (2016-03-17 16:40:41+00:00): Why did you remove the route=ferry tag?
joost schouppe (2016-07-06 20:29:21+00:00): Ha, die Panos is goed gemapped. Heb je tagging style maar overgenomen. Moet die strikt gezien ook niet nog een operator=Panos hebben? Of is dat een franchisenemer, en niet direct iets dat we opnemen?
M!dgard (2016-07-13 13:56:38+00:00): Ik weet niet of het zelfstandige winkels zijn of door Panos zelf worden uitgebaat, daarom heb ik geen operator toegevoegd.
Ik denk trouwens dat ik die stijl misschien zelf wel van iemand anders heb overgenomen. De brand:wikidata is in elk geval Polyglot's invloed. :p
tdctdctdc (2017-06-25 10:02:07+00:00): Hey,
You added a bunch of name=traffic_sign in this changeset. As it is, it has no meaning that I can see for the OSM map. Perhaps you meant traffic_sign=* ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-19 12:47:06+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1242842 ?
user_5359 (2016-03-17 17:01:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your point to the right building.
user_5359 (2016-03-17 16:44:09+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wurde das Gebäude mit dem Montessori Kinderhaus tatsächlich abgerissen oder ist nur das Kinderhaus nicht mehr im Gebäude?
ramyaragupathy (2016-03-18 03:23:12+00:00): Hey Saloni! It is right that you have tagged the roads here as residential. But names cannot be `residential` here.

Name and tags are two different things.

For example a road can be tagged `highway=residential` and the name can be something like `name= Ashoka Street`. You can tag a road as residential/service/trunk/primary by looking at it from the imagery. But name is something you can fill in only if you have local knowledge or a valid source  of information.

`name`  key is used to fill in the real world name of a feature. More about `name` key here,

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
gpstracks (2016-03-17 17:28:56+00:00): Buongiorno.
Volevo gentilmente chiedere il motivo per il quale sono state cancellate alcune strade.

Grazie
AMDmi3 (2016-03-24 20:06:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163929181

"Чапаего"? Уверены?
2maxic (2016-03-24 20:51:08+00:00): опечатка, поправил
AMDmi3 (2016-03-24 21:46:23+00:00): Спасибо!
kartler175 (2016-04-09 11:16:52+00:00): Bevor du so (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.18948&lat=50.03746&zoom=14&baselayer=GeofabrikGerman&opacity=1.00&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way) weitermachst, informiere dich bitte, wie Flächen geometrisch korrekt erfasstt werden. Und bleibe bitte bei den Tatsachen und kleistere Straßen nicht mit Wiesen un Äckern zu, OSM ist kein Malbuch für Landkarten.
hufgardm (2016-04-14 15:47:16+00:00): Sorry wurde korrigiert!

Tschau

Marcus
Hjart (2016-03-17 23:43:00+00:00): Stier mm bør forbinde til banerne på p-pladsen
DD1GJ (2016-03-17 23:46:51+00:00): Hallo Steelarscher, Du hast ohne vernünftigen Kommentar 8 Geschäfte gelöscht. Daher mache ich das wieder rückgängig.
unsungNovelty (2016-03-25 06:21:07+00:00): I can see that this changeset deleted a bunch of service roads for this area. Can you please confirm why you have deleted the service roads for this parking area? I can see that the road exists as per the Bing satellite imagery and you haven't provided any source or changeset comment.
PierZen (2018-03-05 21:43:42+00:00): vous avez ajouté un noeud au croisement du chemin et ligne électique à haute tension. Les voitures vont griller ! J'ai corrigé.
user_5359 (2016-03-18 09:21:58+00:00): Thanks for the complement of the OSM dataset. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Glassman (2016-03-19 05:44:18+00:00): The park is already tagged in OSM.I am removing this name only tag. When adding a feature, besides the name, the feature type should be included. For a park it would be leisure=park. Since the area is already named, a node is not necessary.
mueschel (2016-03-18 10:41:13+00:00): Hi ragra2808,
there are a lot of misspelled new keys popping up in Melbourne recently. E.g. I found
dwelings, dwelligns, dwellinds, Dwellings, Dwelling as well as
caparks, car park, car_park, carparking, carparks

Some of them are added by you, some by others. Is this some kind of common mapping effort going on there? If so, could you write a note to the others that spelling of keys is very important as is documentation in the Wiki which seems missing.

Cheers and enjoy OSM,
Jan
kartler175 (2016-04-02 21:06:56+00:00): Please be careful with editing highways. You freqently disconntected higway sections. See
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-73.66772&lat=45.50204&zoom=17&opacity=1.00&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways

For consequences see: http://map.project-osrm.org/?z=16&center=45.499880%2C-73.669617&loc=45.500707%2C-73.669145&loc=45.499643%2C-73.661951&hl=en&alt=0
SomeoneElse (2016-03-23 12:59:22+00:00): Would it be possible to explain in a bit more detail about what the change actually was here?  "#to-fix:highwayhighway" doesn't actually say anything.

Also what are the turn restrictions at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2667031585 ?
samely (2016-03-23 14:11:48+00:00): Hey there! I was working on connectivity errors using To-Fix : http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix/#/stats/highwayhighway. I didn't consider the turn restriction, but now is done! Thanks for your feedback.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-23 14:55:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6074901 isn't correct.  Traffic from the west can carry on along the ring road as well as turn right.  It can't turn left.  You'd need to survey it to see if u-turns are prohibited here.
There will be other similar restrictions at the other nodes too.
samely (2016-03-23 19:47:56+00:00): You were right. I fixed it and added a note because I don't know about turn restrictions at this point. I just wanted to intersect highways. I'll be careful next time. Thanks!
Maartends (2016-03-27 10:31:11+00:00): Eric,

might it be that, in this changeset, you accidentally deleted:

- a way called 'Branduddens väg' connecting way/404298254 (Kolmyrsvägen) to the north with way/386014573 (path) ->
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/312617858/history

- a way called 'Göstas Väg' ->
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385982788/history

Compare, for instance, OSM standard with OSM DE (which has not yet been re-rendered) on http://mc.bbbike.org/mc/?lon=11.268175&lat=58.661202&zoom=16&num=2&mt0=mapnik&mt1=mapnik-german

Kind regards,
Maarten
aceman444 (2016-03-17 23:33:58+00:00): Hi. When you join roads like this, be sure it is actually possible to turn at the joins you have created (junctions). In this case it is not possible (the roads were intentionally not connected). So you have allowed incorrect routing at this junction. Please do not do that again if you do not know the place.

I have now fixed it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37909579
karitotp (2016-03-20 14:58:22+00:00): Hi aceman444,
Thanks for your feedback and fixing the wrong junction. 
I was working on connectivity errors using [to-fix](http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix) and did not realize the missing junction was intentional. So I'll be more careful in these case. Thanks again.
Rub21 (2016-03-21 14:50:42+00:00): Hey aceman444- We are detecting all crossing highway issues in the world and we are fixing them, however why you left intentionally the crossing highways? that is not perfectly good for navigation, maybe it works but not completely fine. Also I saw the issue (junction) was fixed it by you, it looks awesome.

Thank you.
aceman444 (2016-03-22 20:48:53+00:00): Yes, I know crossing roads should have a common node to have a complete navigation. The roads were not joined to have a proper navigation atleast for normal cars (not caring about ambulances or so). The other (perfect) alternative was to join the roads but add the ton of turn-restriction relations. I have done that after your (and others') edit on the junction. My point was, your change did make things worse also for normal cars as you didn't add the restrictions. It would allow life-threatening 150deg turns which are actually not allowed on that junction. So theoretically you are right, but you can't fix the problem (crossing roads) blindy half-way without knowing the place and adding the turn restrictions where needed. Thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 20:24:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52338424 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
GinaroZ (2020-06-09 12:33:10+00:00): Do you know what this surface value is meant to be? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404302949
drnoble (2020-06-10 19:25:38+00:00): @GinaroZ possibly "paved" but I might head out this way at the weekend and take a look, There are apparently a few paths resurfaced in this area
drnoble (2020-06-13 10:15:44+00:00): Have updated to asphalt following survey
MKnight (2016-03-23 14:19:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness#H.C3.A4ufige_Fehler
mapper999 (2016-03-18 16:31:05+00:00): Ist es korrekt, dass der Zusatz Städtisches Klinikum in der Kußmaulstraße entfallen ist? Falls ja sollte man vielleicht ein note und old_name, bzw ein alt_name ergänzen, da der Zusatz zum Beispiel im Liniennetzplan und auf den Mapillary-Bildern noch enthalten ist.
bjoern262 (2016-03-18 16:36:23+00:00): Laut Fahrplantabelle/ -auskunft und Haltestellenverzeichnis KVV heißt die Haltestelle nur "Kußmaulstraße". Ich kann aber gerne einen alt_name hinzufügen.
Nakaner (2016-03-19 11:43:12+00:00): Wir taggen als name=*, was vor Ort ausgeschildert ist. Abweichende Namen aus Kursbüchern etc. werden als alt_name=* erfasst. Schönes Beispiel ist der DB(!)-Bahnhof Bretten, der als "Bretten Bf" beschildert ist, was ein name="Bretten Bahnhof" (wir kürzen nicht ab) und alt_name/official_name=Bretten (DB-Betriebsstellenname) ergibt.
muralito (2016-03-18 00:05:56+00:00): Please stop making changes without surveying the data in the field. You are making a lot of mistakes.
bryceco (2016-03-30 19:48:14+00:00): Shouldn't these be Southwest instead of SW? Abbreviations are discouraged.
Viajero Perdido (2016-03-30 21:49:19+00:00): Hi bryceco.

I'm following the example of the Edmonton wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:Alberta:Edmonton where they use NW in the examples.  

And... I believe the streets are actually officially named NW, SW, etc.  Checked my property tax bill; it says NW.

And... I haven't yet seen a renderer smart enough to abbreviate "North-west", so things were quite a mess visually.
Viajero Perdido (2016-03-30 21:50:39+00:00): So in short, it's not abbreviation-by-mapper, it's abbreviation-by-municipality.  Municipality does whatever they want.
bryceco (2016-03-30 23:45:35+00:00): Okay sounds good. BTW I'm down in PV mapping and saw the note you dropped; that's the only reason I was checking out your edits.
dudka (2016-03-21 16:02:44+00:00): проверьте пожалуйста мультиполигон http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3596271

похоже вы его сделали невалидным когда редактировали линию http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268240069
Serzhanya (2016-04-01 22:05:45+00:00): Спасибо, поправил.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:54:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:55:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
BeKri (2016-03-20 07:20:46+00:00): Servus Roland,
Danke für's rausnehmen des Leerzeichen bei der Hausnummer, allein es hilft nix, Anoniman ist anderer Meinung und hat es wieder eingebaut. Ich habe ihn schon angeschrieben, vielleicht hilft es was ...
kubahahaha (2021-10-22 21:54:49+00:00): O co chodzi z tą nazwą Króla Zygmunta?
Zbigniew_Cz (2021-10-23 06:43:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3468362526
 - ten nazwany kawałek drogi musi zostać w tym miejscu ze względu na ten pojedynczy adres.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:55:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_242798 (2016-12-08 08:53:52+00:00): Bridge (id: 287938474) FIXME, NOT CORRECT:
{building=yes},
{man_made=bridge} SHOULD BE AREA, 
MISSING {bridge=yes}+{layer=1} on highway;
BRIDGE ENDS in the middle of water and SHOULD reach land (CycloMedia, BING);
Unclosed building.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:55:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:55:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Viajero Perdido (2016-03-18 02:00:22+00:00): Apologies if I accidentally referred to some hand-editing with that "Geobase droppings" crack.  I've just changed the whole city over to the standard NW (and SW etc.) terminology, per the Edmonton OSM wiki.

Geobase had set a bad example and provided a ton of extra work...
CloCkWeRX (2016-10-27 04:45:19+00:00): Do you know if the intersection at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/614616601 is accurate? Imagery suggests something different to what is mapped.

Strava users report: "it will always send me up this road against traffic. I must deviate around it one block and then cut over.", which I think refers to that intersection.
fayor (2016-10-27 13:36:15+00:00): A quanto mi risulta l'incrocio è mappato correttamente. L'immagine si riferisce a un periodo precedente.
Thundercel (2016-05-08 21:48:51+00:00): Quem disse que trunk deve ser duplicada? de acordo com http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway identificamos que Trunk The most important roads in a country's system that aren't motorways. (Need not necessarily be a divided highway.)  Havia eu alterado para trunk após debates internos e desejaria que retornasse para trunk
Skippern (2016-05-08 23:21:54+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Pt-br:How_to_map_a#Propostas_de_classifica.C3.A7.C3.A3o_de_vias
Thundercel (2016-05-08 23:39:51+00:00): O link apontado trata-se de uma página de discussão e proposta não aprovada. O que vale é a página por mim apontada http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway onde é citado: highway 	trunk 	Way 	The most important roads in a country's system that aren't motorways. (Need not necessarily be a divided highway.)
Thundercel (2016-05-08 23:45:25+00:00): Aproveito a oportunidade para lembr-alo do compromisso assumido de correção do roteamento cruzando Vitória e saindo da Br-101.
Skippern (2016-05-09 00:10:55+00:00): EU fiz números testes do roteamento entre as cidades Iconha, Anchietano, Guarapari, Viana, Vila Velha, Vitória e Serra, com o BR-101 como truck e como primary, no meu Garmin Nüvi50 e no Garmin BaseCamp, e entrou em contato com departamento de desinvolmento das formatas das mapas Garmin, e com diferencia em comprimento nos trechos não vai adiantar fazer o roteamento passa o contorno do Cariacico em vez do passa pelo Vila Velha/Vitória sem fazer obstruções falsos no vitória. Vi no jornal que Vitória vai reduzir velocidade de sirculação que pode ajudar roteamento "mais rápida", mas roteamento "mais curto" vai continuar passa VV/VIX até um novo formato das mapas pode ser disponível
Skippern (2016-05-09 00:14:01+00:00): Tambem o Eco101 informou que trabalho com duplicação ja começou, mas ainda não sei que trecho que vai ser o primeiro. Único que vi ate agora e preparação das algum patios das maquinas entre Guarapari e Viana.
Thundercel (2016-05-09 01:50:31+00:00): Agora estou morando em Vila Velha. Vou reabrir o debate sobre classificação de vias porque o que ocorreu levava em conta as condições da época. Hoje no Brasil as velocidades estão sendo reduzidas na maioria das rodovias para 60 km/h. Devemos ter o bom senso que não é recomendável retirar um tráfego da BR-101 em cruzamento da grande Vitória fazendo com que ele entre nas cidades de Vila Velha e Vitória para novamente pegar a BR-101. Não podemos desconsiderar a BR-101 Contorno que foi construída para desafogar o tráfego em cruzamento.
Thundercel (2016-05-09 01:55:56+00:00): E quanto a duplicação volto a comentar que mundialmente uma TRUNK não precisa ser duplicada como citado em http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway que aqui reproduzo: highway 	trunk 	Way 	The most important roads in a country's system that aren't motorways. (Need not necessarily be a divided highway.) 
Não se pode negar que a BR-101 é a mais importante rodovia que cruza o Espírito Santo e ela temd e ter dessa forma uma classificação maior que as demais no estado.
Thundercel (2016-06-01 17:39:53+00:00): Estou aguardando sua resposta aqui já que Trunk não precisa ser duplicada.