piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-11-29 13:52:40+00:00): quote of Michael Montani, PM on this project about tracks :
Regarding tracks, we usually use them when the scope of the road is generic or unclear (it is used to reach agricultural or natural areas), while we put unclassified only when it is a clear connector between villages and towns. Often, you need to look far away your mapping area to understand the role of one road. People in Somalia are mainly moving by foot, small motorbikes and vehicles, and by going through the desert they actually create the trace. I personally tend to map a road/path if I see it is leading to something (a village, a small pond, and hedge), even though, as before, you may have to look a bit futher your mapping area to take a final decision. I hope this cleared your questions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128952498
Osmwithspace (2023-02-09 12:10:45+00:00): Hallo DL2ZAV,
soll das wirklich als Übergang eingezeichnet sein?
Grüße Osmwithspace
gscholz (2022-12-18 07:25:20+00:00): Hi Grannymeg,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=80.46805&lat=6.69205&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128952589

Can you please fix this?

You may like to educate yourself about how to edit multipolygon relations:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind regards
Guido
Frans S (2022-11-29 14:07:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
About tagging of highways. 
Please map roads in accordance with this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
Do not over extract. Especially in roads / rivers networks, there may be many paths / streams in the imagery. You are not requested to map them all, and most of the time you can trace only the main ones as explained in the instruction.
Main roads are to be tagged as highway=unclassified in general

The tag Secondary is to be used as a connection between towns etc.
These are leading just to an empty place.  Unclassified is a better tag.
Best regards
Supaplex (2022-11-16 01:15:07+00:00): 他宅->住宅
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128952792
highflyer74 (2023-01-10 17:21:45+00:00): Moin! Ich würde "Haus 11a" etc nicht als Eigenname sehen. Eher "Nordseehaus" oder "Haus der schönen Aussicht". In diesem Fall wird (vermutlich) nur die Adresse besonders prominent dargestellt. Das ist aber nur eine Vermutung, da ich selbst nicht vor Ort war. Kannst du dich noch erinnern?
Verkehrskai (2023-01-10 17:38:04+00:00): Moin,
es ist tatsächlich ein Eigenname. Hintergrund: Die Häuser gehörten zum alten Telekomgelände, welches für alle Gebäude eigene "Namen" hatte. Daher heißen diese Haus 11a etc. Hat also nichts mit der Hausnummer zu tun, sondern stammt noch aus der Zeit und ist auch so vor Ort zu finden.
highflyer74 (2023-01-10 17:42:55+00:00): Ah, alles klar. Kannst du vielleicht in diesem alten Hinweis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/426923) noch etwas beitragen? Dann könnte man den mal schließen. Viele Grüße!
Verkehrskai (2023-01-10 17:57:24+00:00): Hab ich kommentiert und auf erledigt gesetzt. Hoffe es ist so in deinem Sinne. Lieben Gruß.
rarad74 (2022-11-16 16:13:32+00:00): Salut. Nu se pun niciodata strazi rezidentiale in jurul magazinelor gen supermarketuri. Toate sunt service roads. Lasa-le asa ca le-ai inebunit de tot!!!
OddlyAngled (2022-11-16 01:58:03+00:00): did you also modify the existing canyon?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128953724
Frans S (2022-11-29 13:36:04+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
A few points.
Did you take the courses how to map?
On this project we are to ask to map roads
Are you familiar with the guidelines of how to map and tag highways ?
If not, please read these wiki pages

Please map roads in accordance with this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines
Do not over extract. Especially in roads / rivers networks there may be many paths / streams in the imagery. You are not requested to map them all, and most of the time you can trace only the main ones as explained in the instruction.
Main roads are to be tagged as highway=unclassified in general
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128953801
Frans S (2022-11-29 13:36:10+00:00): quote of Michael Montani, PM on this project about tracks :
Regarding tracks, we usually use them when the scope of the road is generic or unclear (it is used to reach agricultural or natural areas), while we put unclassified only when it is a clear connector between villages and towns. Often, you need to look far away your mapping area to understand the role of one road. People in Somalia are mainly moving by foot, small motorbikes and vehicles, and by going through the desert they actually create the trace. I personally tend to map a road/path if I see it is leading to something (a village, a small pond, and hedge), even though, as before, you may have to look a bit futher your mapping area to take a final decision. I hope this cleared your questions!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128953801
JJIglesias (2022-11-15 18:48:26+00:00): Slds
e) Ningún objeto lleva Nombre (name), a no ser que tenga nombre propio; así una casa NO tiene ningún nombre; como SI puede tener un edificio, la etiqueta (Tag) define la Identidad del objeto; el nombre solo se coloca a objetos que SI tienen un nombre propio real (Ejemplos: Edificio Los Tiempos, o Panadería Uvita, o Farmacia Bolivar, etc.). Ningún nombre se escribe en MAYUSCULAS, todo va capitalizado ósea solo lleva Mayúsculas la primera letra de cada palabra; tal como los ejemplos anteriores.
Quack87 (2022-12-12 18:05:56+00:00): budynek został wyburzony - na najnowszej mapie satelitarniej go nie ma. Droga jest w lini [prostej.
MomSaysBeKind (2022-11-15 18:23:55+00:00): I'm brand new and learning. I realize now I should have saved after each section I did, versus working through a bunch of areas and then saving. I will get better! I used ESRI to see updated satellite so I could get the newly built buildings in. In some cases, landscaping, sidewalks, and drive throughs aren't fully updated on satellite, so they'll need corrected/finished later. But at least the businesses are there now with their open hours and labels.
Allison P (2022-11-15 21:16:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

A few things from this changeset:

Don't use names as descriptions, like on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/929534812 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113411405. Not all features need to be tagged with a name.

Some of the features were duplicated, such as the Wendy's and ICCU mapped as nodes under construction. Make sure a feature isn't already represented in some way before adding it.

A lot of presets add tags indicating that an area is a building. For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080134565, this is incorrect. The entire lot on which the restaurant is located has been marked as a building. For features like that, the building itself should be tagged with the restaurant information.

Hope this helps! I've made a few of the more advanced corrections myself.
NorthCrab (2022-11-15 21:08:54+00:00): Witaj,

Proponuję użyć jakiegoś tagu do opisania tego punktu aby aplikacje mogły to zrozumieć. Możeby tak: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:backcountry?

Sprawdziłem też website i nie znalazłem tam informacji na temat tego punktu, to wygląda jak po prostu link do innej mapy. Natomiast poszukałem i znalazłem coś takiego: https://www.lasy.gov.pl/pl/turystyka/program-zanocuj-w-lesie Uważam że ta strona byłaby bardziej informacyjna dla użytkownika.
Carnildo (2022-11-16 00:00:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

Please don't abbreviate names.  It's easy for a computer to construct an abbreviation when it needs to save space, but nearly impossible to expand one.  (For example, is "St" short for "Street", "State", or "Saint"?)
jrr_yvcog (2022-11-16 19:43:34+00:00): I puzzled over what to do with the highway name for a while before saving.  I scanned around looking for an example but could not find one in a reasonable amount of time.  I'll keep this in mind in the future and thank you for the admonishment.
Carnildo (2022-11-17 02:39:23+00:00): If you've got questions, the "help and support" section of the forum is reasonably active: https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/help-and-support/7/none

You can also look around on the OSM Wiki for answers: whatever information you're looking for is probably there somewhere, though it can be tricky to find at times.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
Jorge Rivas (2023-01-08 17:59:51+00:00): Autodeon sigue ahí, Casa Odeón es otro negocio.
Vuelvo a añadir Autodeón
silversurfer83 (2022-11-16 12:54:10+00:00): Moin,
du hast einen Feld-/Waldweg ohne Angabe von Gründen (Quellen) gelöscht. Wie kommts?
Grüße
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128955763
Geo-Tobi (2022-11-16 18:29:05+00:00): Servus. Ja, bin da entlang gewandert. Einige Wege existierten nicht mehr. 
Grüße
daniel_k (2023-01-31 19:43:05+00:00): Wird der Eschelhof wirklich noch landwirtschaftlich genutzt? Ich dachte er dient nur noch als Wanderheim des Schwäbischen Albvereins. Also: farmyard: disused ->yes ?
map per (2022-11-17 19:24:59+00:00): Hallo woerther,

bezüglich "Meine Änderungen Überürpfen":
Sieht alles gut aus, danke für die Korrektur!

Viele Grüße
map per
Frans S (2022-11-28 14:59:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project,
A remark. When you map a trace as a path, check the width of that trace,
A width more than 2 mtr should be considered as a highway= unclassified,  depending on the purpose of that road.

 How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.
best regards and keep mapping
Lapjun (2022-11-30 00:19:53+00:00): Thank you for the tip, I will use this for future mapping.
AngocA (2023-09-09 05:30:28+00:00): Hola Oscar. Gracias por haber contribuido a las divisiones de Bogotá.
Te quería comentar que se vincula un Wikidata ítem y un artículo de wikipedia solo cuando existe. No encontré un artículo para 2 de las UPZs de Bosa de este changeset.
https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/Colombia%20(Kolumbia).html

Te recomiendo lo tengas en cuenta para que sigamos mejorando nuestro mapa.
emersonveenstra (2022-11-16 21:06:01+00:00): Hi,

This phone number is formatted wrong. Please see the correct format here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Usage and fix it, thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128957303
jcr83 (2022-11-15 21:35:20+00:00): Bonjour,
Quelle est votre source pour le "Caïre Garouns" ? La carte IGN TOP25 indique "Caïre Garous" et celle de 1950 "Caïre Garons". Pourriez-vous mettre à jour le champ "source" de ce sommet (vous avez laissé "IGN BDTOPO 2021-12-15" ?
Garabus (2022-11-16 19:06:40+00:00): Bonjour,

Comme l'atteste la carte au 25 000° de l'IGN, il existe dans le secteur plusieurs lieux nommés "Garouns" : la combe des Garouns, la crête des Garouns, le collet Garouns.

Il s'agit manifestement du même nom que celui du caïre voisin, que les locaux prononcent pareillement avec la voyelle nasalisée finale transcrite par la séquence "-oun" (selon la graphie mistralienne).

Sur la carte IGN au 50 000° de 1950 (elle-même issue de cartes italiennes antérieures, car le secteur était italien jusqu'au traité de Paris de 1947) comme sur le cadastre, le caïre est nommé "Garons". La graphie "on" est en effet une transcription classique de la voyelle nasalisée "oun" dont on retrouve de très nombreux exemples dans la toponymie francisée des Alpes-Maritimes :  Falicon pour Falicoun, Paillon pour Paioun ou Palhoun, Peillon pour Peilhoun, Aspremont pour Aspremount ou Aspermount, Bonson pour Bounsoù, Cantaron pour Cantaroun, Castillon pour Castilhoun, Conségudes pour Counseguò, Gourdon pour Gourdoun, Gordolon pour Gordoloun, Venanson pour Venansoun...

En passant de la carte au 50 000° aux cartes ultérieures au 25 000°, l'IGN n'a pas seulement enrichi ses cartes de nouveaux toponymes, il semble aussi s'être efforcé de mieux rendre compte des usages et des prononciations locales mais sans grande méthode. Il était ainsi certainement judicieux d'ajouter systématiquement le tréma sur le i de caïre, sans doute aussi de remplacer "Monte Combuglion" par "Mont Combouillon" (même si Comboulhoun ou simplement Combouioun eut été préférable) mais pourquoi avoir conservé la graphie italienne dans "les Adus" alors que l'on dit "les Adous" (toponyme très répandu désignant un point d'eau, une source) ?

Pour en revenir aux Garouns, pourquoi l'IGN a-t-il choisi de nommer le caïre "Garous" alors qu'il nommait correctement, juste à côté, la combe des Garouns, le collet Garouns, la crête des Garouns ? Mon hypothèse est qu'il s'est basé sur la carte esquisse du docteur Paschetta, car c'est ainsi que le caïre y est désigné (au moins dans la 6ème édition de 1965), tandis que les noms de la combe, de la crête et du collet (non nommés chez Paschetta) ont sans doute été directement recueillis sur le terrain.
Carto'Cité (2022-12-13 11:38:47+00:00): Salut Nzau,
J'ai remarqué une erreur assez classique sur l'ajout de cette piste. Elle était déjà décrite en cycleway=track dans ces way :https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103510564
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1024028785
C'est un classique rassure-toi. Ça crée des doublons. C'est quelque chose qui s'identifie très facielement sous JOSM avec le rendu des aménagements cyclables. Pour info c'est mieux maintenant avec ta contribution car là c’était ajout sur le way de la route avec StreetComplete ce qui n'est pas toujours le plus adapté.
À bientôt.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Nzau (2022-12-13 13:57:26+00:00): Salut Charles,
Effectivement tu as bien fait de corriger ça merci !
Il faut aussi que j'y retourne parce qu'il y a eu des gros travaux un peu plus loin.
Merci, Nzau
aceman444 (2022-11-20 21:52:08+00:00): You removed the shop=furniture from the IKEA shop, effectively disabling it as a shop. Pay more attention next time.
archpdx (2022-11-15 22:22:31+00:00): It appears that you are editing on behalf of a company. If so, that's perfectly fine, but we require that you comply with OpenStreetMap's organized editing guidelines and document the activities your company is doing on the wiki:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
gscholz (2022-11-16 08:54:13+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
Dodko (2022-12-06 14:50:55+00:00): building=pharmacy sa nepoužíva
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building

addr:conscriptionnumber=1831
súpisné číslo sa nemaže, je súčasťou adresy
gscholz (2022-11-17 07:14:50+00:00): Hi andreaadelgado1,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and overlapping buildings:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128958617

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-20 07:07:52+00:00): Hi andreaadelgado1, 
this error still exists, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
andreaadelgado1 (2022-11-21 11:12:16+00:00): Hello! How can I fix it? I dont know how.. I tried with JOSM but couldnt do it
gscholz (2022-11-27 09:01:45+00:00): Hi andreaadelgado1,
thanks for your response. You can just revert your changeset:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

Guido
andreaadelgado1 (2022-11-28 11:39:38+00:00): i think its done :)
gscholz (2022-11-30 11:29:46+00:00): Hi andreaadelgado1, 
not really, I had to help out but there are still a lot of overlapping buildings.

Here is an old changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82024558

Which collides with this newer changeset:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128577879

May be you like to invest some time here.
Guido
NorthCrab (2022-11-15 23:19:55+00:00): you know if you know
Paradox460 (2022-11-16 18:09:56+00:00): Looks good
Map_HeRo (2025-06-14 17:47:19+00:00): Hallo Interteutones, Du hast in Winden einer Betonruine am Bahndamm den Namen "Füllrumpf" hinzugefügt. Dieser lässt sich nicht verifizieren, bis heute ist unklar, was dieses Gebäude überhaupt darstellen soll. Hast Du eine Quelle für diesen Namen? Siehe dazu auch die Diskussion im Forum: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/fullrumpf-in-winden/131228/1
Gruß Mikke
gscholz (2022-11-16 08:51:37+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
Patr1k_P (2022-11-19 20:18:32+00:00): kapor ako zdroj sa už neuvádza, keďže už neexistuje.. pre obkreslenie z wms by sa malo použiť source=ZBGIS
Dodko (2022-11-20 09:11:11+00:00): Pridal som im aj adresy.
Dodko (2022-11-20 09:11:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Slovakia/Sources#ZBGIS_WMS
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:08:25+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:08:21+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:07:54+00:00):      Hi micmahon,
    this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

    Kind regards
    Guido
marczoutendijk (2022-12-07 19:43:13+00:00): Hi,
Why did you draw a path in the middle of nowhere that connects nothing with nothing?
Also you should use highway=path, not name=path.
See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
englu (2022-11-16 13:51:12+00:00): Czy w okolicach 49.656291, 21.018777 stara droga została zlikwidowana? Po nagranych śladach widać, że jest mocno uczęszczana (zrzut ekranu tu: https://we.tl/t-cd7hy7tcM7). Czy może w terenie są dwie drogi?
Domino123 (2022-11-18 20:01:06+00:00): Nie zauważyłem że poprawiając przebieg drogi zmieniłem też przebieg szlaku turystycznego. Prowadzi on ścieżką w śladzie ''starej" drogi, równolegle do "nowej" drogi. Poprawiłem w nowym zestawie zmian. Dzięki za czujność. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129099777
englu (2022-11-19 08:10:18+00:00): Dzięki za poprawkę.
maraf24 (2022-11-16 10:41:50+00:00): power=minor_line, bo to sieć 400V
gscholz (2022-11-16 08:53:44+00:00):      Hi micmahon,
    this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

    Kind regards
    Guido
canfe (2022-11-16 06:07:55+00:00): Ho trovato un po' di tettoie a Chieri con layer a 1 ma senza che ci passi nulla sotto.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593446872
Se non ci passa nulla, non sarebbe di default a zero?
ivanbranco (2022-11-16 08:15:21+00:00): Teoricamente dovrebbe essere così,

ho visto che anche tu hai applicato lo stesso tagging ad alcuni roof, nel tuo caso qual era la logica?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918135452
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/918135453
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062934001

Questo check di iD è up dal 26 agosto 2018 e nessuno se ne è mai lamentato, ho dato per scontato ci fosse un consenso, anche perché esiste già un check separato sugli edifici sovrapposti a way, quindi direi che è deliberata l'aggiunta ai building che non si sovrappongono a null'altro. Se non sei d'accordo secondo me sarebbe utile aprire una issue su GitHub o commentare la issue originale https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/5204
canfe (2022-12-18 08:44:18+00:00): Rispondo purtroppo dopo molto tempo, ma son stato preso da mille cose.
Ti ringrazio per le tre segnalazioni. Era in effetti un lavoro non finito. Ora ho fatto passare sotto i roof le strade di servzio.
In effetti ID aggiunge il layer di default, mentre JOSM no.
Ci può stare.
gscholz (2022-11-16 09:08:34+00:00):  Hi micmahon,
this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-16 08:52:20+00:00):      Hi micmahon,
    this changeset has created a lot of mess. I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about the OSM basics before you continue:

    https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

    Kind regards
    Guido
nimrodxx (2025-02-13 08:49:40+00:00): Warum hast du oneway auf no gesetzt auf dem Stück?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/735075124

Zwischen "Am Papenholz" und "Am Stadion" stehen keine Schilder, die das Fahrradfahren in Gegenrichtung zulassen, erst ab der Straße "Am Stadion" bis zur Kreuzung "Lehrter Straße" ist eine beidseitige Nutzung freigegeben
Langlaeufer (2025-02-13 09:44:08+00:00): Vermutlich weil an der nächsten Kreuzung wieder ein 241 steht.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=167462241883908&focus=photoway=735075124#map=20/52.3174083/9.9599144

Aber ja, da dort kein Zeichen steht ist es strenggenommen auf dem Abschnitt nicht erlaubt in diese Richtung zu fahren.
nimrodxx (2025-02-13 12:06:52+00:00): Stimmt, danach steht wieder eins, hat mit den örtlichen Gegebenheiten zu tun.

50% der Schüler, die Richtung Sehnde Mitte wollen, fahren durch das Papenholz und müssten den zeitgleich fahrenden Elterntaxis auf der B65 ausweichen um auf die "Richtige" Seite zu kommen -> Nicht zumutbar.

Eine Kreuzung vorher ist aber eine Fuß-/Fahrradampel, die nicht zu nutzen ist reine Faulheit ;-)

Und in Sehnde werden Verkehrsregeln sehr ernst genommen, da kontrolliert der Bürgermeister noch selbst :D
nimrodxx (2025-02-13 12:14:04+00:00): Ganz streng genommen, darfst du auch nur dann in die Richtung fahren, wenn du aus "Am Stadion" kommst, denn 10m später steht ein Schild, das den Fahrradfahrern aus der Bismarkstraße nur das Fahren in Fahrtrichtung erlaubt (241 + Pfeil in Fahrtrichtung)
Langlaeufer (2025-02-13 14:14:30+00:00): Nein, das Schild hebt ja das andere nicht auf. Der Pfeil ist jedoch überflüssig oder falsch.
Das Ende des Doppelseitigen Radweges ist hier tatsächlich beschildert https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=136642105178508&focus=photo
nimrodxx (2025-02-14 08:29:45+00:00): Ich halte den Pfeil nicht für Überflüssig, so wie es aufgestellt ist, finde ich das sogar sehr logisch. Wer die B65 aus Richtung Bismarkstraße überquert kann auch gleich die richtige Seite nehmen... Und so wie es steht, hat es meiner Meinung nach auch nur für den Fall eine Gültigkeit.

Ansonsten komme ich da ca 10x am Tag vorbei und kenne die Beschilderung ganz gut (und leider auch die nörgelden Anwohner ;-))