piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-08-23 03:11:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
5m4u9 (2019-08-26 21:39:16+00:00): gracias por contriuir
nevw (2019-08-24 02:07:23+00:00): Hi
there is no need to delete these driveways.
Just tag as highway=service + service=driveway + access=private
Supaplex (2020-01-02 14:11:51+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2019-08-23 14:39:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useless information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
Zhent (2019-08-25 10:03:58+00:00): Sorry but you are out of line and have no mandate for the wholesale removal of data. 

It appears you do not understand how OSM works and I would suggest you read through the Wiki pages about OSM and good practice editing.
Key to note:
OpenStreetMap is 'whats on the ground'
OpenStreetMap is not a platform for your local grievances.
pkoby (2019-08-23 20:55:10+00:00): I noticed that you added landuse=forest to a lot of National Forests. I know for a fact that for Wayne and Allegheny, this tag is incorrect. I recently changed the polygons of these two NFs to reflect the actual USFS land, not the proclamation boundaries (which are not the boundaries of the National Forests, but just boundaries where the NFs can acquire land). I have reversed these two NFs, but in future, can you check that the coverage of polygons is actually forest? Thanks!
sebastic (2019-08-23 21:10:06+00:00): The relations don't have tags describing the feature, mostly just the note: "Nantahala National Forest"

That implies landuse=forest. If it's not than it should be tagged accordingly by someone familiar with the on the ground truth, e.g. you.

As long as these (kind of) relations show up in the old-style dataset, they will be on my daily todo list to get them out of it again.
sebastic (2019-08-23 21:11:40+00:00): "It will be removed sometime in the near future.", why wait. Just delete them now if they can't be tagged appropriately.
pkoby (2019-08-23 21:42:37+00:00): I understand that they don't have descriptive tags. Can I suggest for National Forests, instead of landuse=forest, using boundary=protected_area? That's I think the least number of tags to add that would be accurate, but more can be found here if you'd like to supplement: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Public_lands#Agriculture_Department_.28USDA.29_National_Forests_.28USFS.29.2C_National_Grasslands.2C_Special_Biological_Areas.

As for deleting them "sometime in the future", I'm working on it. It's not just a matter of downloading and deleting the ways, because I want to make sure that they aren't breaking anything else if they're connected to something. I have removed 2/3 parts for Wayne. Allegheny is next.

No hard feelings!
Sanniu (2020-02-05 08:59:47+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6737885086 lack proper tagging - is it camping site?
b-jazz (2022-03-31 16:41:19+00:00): I thought this was Pokemon Go map vandalism when I first saw it, but satellite imagery confirms there is actually some sort of course here. Is this a private house with a golf enthusiast? Do the lines between tees and holes actually criss-cross and go through the corner of the house? Is this your house?
user_5359 (2019-08-23 14:33:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your change set because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
user_5359 (2019-08-23 14:31:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!

I have delete your adveritising in the key description. You mention a website, but you don't add this with the key website ?!
nyampire (2019-08-23 06:14:48+00:00): すみません、変更セットとメッセージで、森林データの状況についてご連絡させていただいているのですが、お読みいただけているでしょうか。

すみませんが、森林データを削除することは控えていただけますでしょうか。
また、そうした編集にあたって、どういった意図で削除を行っているか、教えていただければ、コミュニティとしてなにか支援ができるかもしれません。

ご連絡をお待ちしています。
GOwin (2019-08-28 03:49:30+00:00): Are you sure that this is a valid ferry route? This was an administrative boundary relation. Also, are you sure that motor_vehicles are allowed in the Pasig River Ferry system? I don't think so, but please provide reference docs to help us evaluate this change better.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73649469
user_5359 (2019-09-01 16:58:23+00:00): Hello! Don't add a key, if you don't know the value (e.g. access=unknown).
ajijohn (2019-09-02 12:47:21+00:00): Hi User_5359,

Thank you for looking into my edit. Can you please elaborate your concern. I would be happy to learn from the community. Let me know your suggestions.

Regards
ajijohn
user_5359 (2019-09-02 14:58:01+00:00): Hello ajijohn,

please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106615633/history. 

Regards  Georg V. (OSM=user_5359)
viloan (2019-08-23 07:57:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2020-01-02 14:12:22+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
j numminen (2019-08-23 08:38:46+00:00): Hei!
Asetit näille pisteille vantaalaiset osoitteet, vaikka tämä rakennus sijaitsee Helsingissä. Jos Schmiedmann ei enää toimi Konalassa, pisteet voisi mieluummin poistaa. 
Terveisin 
jn
SomeoneElse (2019-08-24 00:26:57+00:00): Strictly speaking, looking at the picture, it definitely looks more a boxcar than a shipping container...
marc__marc (2019-08-25 22:05:42+00:00): Hello SomeoneElse
Indeed you're right.
let's talk about it in the previous changeset where I talk with the previous mapper.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64469784
Regards,
Marc
trial (2020-02-15 16:00:58+00:00): bonjour, je suis tompé par hasard sur ce lot de modifications et j'ai plusieurs remarques :
- les is_in... n'ont pas lieu d'être en France (les communes sont complètes, la géométrie suffit)
- idem pour les ref:FR:commune=09065 ; c'est renseigné dans ref:INSEE de la commune
- les associatedStreet n'ont d'intérêt que si on a des numéros de rue.
J'ai remarqué qu'un autre contributeur a supprimé une telle relation inutile. Je préfère signaler au contributeur initial, c'est plus sympa et plus efficace !
parsd51 (2019-08-23 10:53:43+00:00): Dele af Firskovvej stod, mig bekendt, korrekt som construction (OSM lifecycle) (fra den blinde del af Jægersborgvej til den ensrettede Firskovvej). Resten stod diskuterbart som residential. Se også Mapillary.
osmviborg (2019-08-23 11:22:19+00:00): Nu har jeg også givet et bidrag. Dels på baggrund af 2019 ortofoto & https://www.ltk.dk/sites/ltk.dk/files/styles/content_style_size/public/2019-01/Oversigtsplan_Etape1.jpg
parsd51 (2019-08-23 11:36:15+00:00): På Mapillary fra 5. august 2019 er vejen ikke åben. 
Var forbi i går og så vidt jeg husker var skiltet med “Kun kørsel til Jægersborgvej ...” der stadig.
Ud fra nedenstående kan “virksomhedsdelen” af Firskovvej ikke “klare” trafikken før omlægning.
https://www.ltk.dk/borger/trafik-og-veje/vejprojekter/anlaegsarbejde-paa-firskovvej/etape-2-midlertidig-omdannelse-af-den-eksisterende-firskovvej ﻿
osmviborg (2019-08-23 12:30:26+00:00): Jeg har rettet til 'construction'.
parsd51 (2019-08-23 13:03:03+00:00): Super
TueAA (2019-08-26 13:47:45+00:00): Fair nok ;-)
mueschel (2019-08-24 12:05:53+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded 26 objects with strange tags that don't look like they belong to OSM:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6738216218

Were these uploaded by mistake?

Jan
Alecs01 (2019-09-01 09:52:46+00:00): La pagina wiki "Matera" si riferisce alla città, non c'entra nulla qui.
PT-53 (2019-08-24 07:17:39+00:00): Hallo,
wenn Du Gebäude "verbesserst", dann benutze doch bitte Maps4BW! Sonst wird das, wie bei diesem Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220717678/history
eine Verschlimmbesserung!
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-09-10 08:55:37+00:00): Hallo Dietmar,
kümmerst Du Dich noch darum?
Fragende Grüße
NVBW_Seifert (2019-09-10 09:25:52+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
ich habe zwar Deinen früheren Kommentart zugegebenermaßen vergessen, also danke für die Nachfrage, aber ich habe jetzt mal die Historie des Gebäudes, das Du angegeben hast, geprüft und das habe ich nicht geändert, es wurde zuletzt 2016 bearbeitet.
Meinst Du ein anderes Gebäude oder findest Du, ich hätte das dieses Gebäude bei der Gelegenheit verbessern können?
PT-53 (2019-09-10 10:21:16+00:00): Hallo Dietmar,
Du mußt Dir die History der Knoten anschauen. Dann siehst Du, daß das Gebäude am 23.08.2019 von Dir verschoben wurde.
Grüße
NVBW_Seifert (2019-09-10 10:31:32+00:00): ok, das Gebäude um 1,86m zu verschieben ist aber nicht wirklich eine Verschlimbesserung, oder?
Ich habe es gemäß maps4bw angepasst und das südwestliche Gebäude mit Hnr. 3 aber auf Basis Luftbild vergrößert, weil die Dachfläche meistens zählt. Bei der Gelegenheit noch einige Gebäude in der Umgebung nach mapw4bw in Lage korrigiert, hoffentlich nur zum besseren.
Grüße Dietmar
PT-53 (2019-09-10 10:42:54+00:00): Die Änderungen vom 23.08. an o.g. Gebäude waren aber "total unnötig", da das Gebäude zuvor gem. Maps4BW lagegenau eingezeichnet war!
Dir ist schon bekannt, daß in OSM - soweit möglich - Gebäude mit dem EG-Grundriß und nicht mit der Dachfläche eingezeichnet werden sollen?
Ich dachte Du seist ein erfahrener Mapper. 
Zweifelnde Grüße
NVBW_Seifert (2019-09-10 11:07:53+00:00): Du nimmst die map4bw als Grundlage einfach hin, das passt auch nicht immer.
Zum Grundriß versus Dach: das geht hin und her, ich erinnere mich eher an die Dachfläche als mehrheitliche Aussage in einem früheren Forums-Thread.
Was machst Du bei Bahnhöfen mit Vordächern? Die sind bei maps4bw nicht drin. Ich ergänze die schon noch und tagge sie extra. Vertrau nicht zu sehr den offiziellen Daten
PT-53 (2019-09-10 11:39:14+00:00): Ja, auch Maps4BW enthält Fehler. Das hält sich aber sehr in Grenzen. 
Ich habe anfangs - in meiner unmittelbaren Umgebung - wegen den teilweise großen Unterschieden zw. Luftbild und Maps4BW bezüglich Umriß einige Gebäude besichtigt. Bei allen lag die Ursache in den Dachüberhängen bzw. Vordächern (wie bei landw. Gebäuden früher oft üblich) und nicht bei Fehlern in Maps4BW.
Auszug aus DE:Key:building
>> Versuche, die wahre Position der Grundfläche am Boden zu ermitteln und nicht die des Daches. <<
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-09-23 11:34:50+00:00): Gebäude Bahnhofstraße 3 wieder an Maps4BW angepaßt.
Leo Slager (2019-08-23 22:24:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-08-23 22:29:18+00:00): Hier is wel het een en ander fout gegaan.
We nemen je dat zeker niet kwalijk.
Alle begin is moeilijk.
De omtrek van het parkeerterrein krijgt de tag amenity=parking.
Daarna kun je de wegen op de parkeerplaats intekenen en die krijgen dan highway=service, etc etc.
Je kunt dat alles nalezen/opzoeken in de wiki.
Als er vragen zijn, kun je die rustig stellen.
Dat kan op het forum of via een PB aan mij.
Leo Slager (2019-08-23 22:29:57+00:00): Ik zal wat verbeteringen aanbrengen. Dan kun je zien hoe het er dan uitziet.
Thierry1030 (2020-12-04 09:43:58+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/uKYy_6lwrHemvpu1ea2kLg
Dag Joost, de 2 witte onderborden zijn ondertussen vervangen door een blauw onderbord, maar de toelating voor fietsers en bromfietsers klasse A is nog steeds van kracht ... :-)
joost schouppe (2020-12-04 11:37:58+00:00): Juist, dan lijkt me dit correcter:
vehicle=private
mofa=yes
bicycle=yes
Ik heb het alvast zo aangepast.
Jammer dat ik daar dus niet met de pedelec mag komen!
Thierry1030 (2020-12-04 14:52:21+00:00): ok merci. Heel de westkant van't kanaal moogt ge inderdaad (op de jaagpaden) met de SP NIET in, de oostkant uiteraard wel ... er valt daar anders niet te veel te zoeken ze, buiten een hele hoop ergerlijke kasseien en de andere stukken met veeel modder ... :-(
skquinn (2020-07-27 21:06:12+00:00): Please do not add shop=yes with no other information. To have any hope of completing the data, we need at least a name or address.
viloan (2019-08-23 09:35:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
RicoElectrico (2019-08-23 11:29:18+00:00): Hej, jesteś pewien, że to jest cały jeden budynek, a nie obszar przemysłowy? Czy SUW to stacja uzdatniania wody?
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
Hjart (2019-08-23 16:02:33+00:00): Jeg retter lige denne her tilbage igen. Se gadens historik for begrundelse
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
sabas88 (2019-08-24 08:09:48+00:00): Questa settimana via gropallo nel tratto in piano diventa senso unico verso via romani
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
Blueduck1847 (2019-08-24 15:31:20+00:00): 이름
Riyadi IRM-RV (2020-03-17 07:32:30+00:00): halo angys, i've check this area. there's primary link w607743609 with long segment. this way have different segment with the other primary link in other side . please kindly suggest the road segment should be is. or you can fix that segment if any wrong.

thank you
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
PT-53 (2019-08-23 15:30:00+00:00): Hallo Angela,
Willkommen bei OSM.
Ringgenbach ist ein Teilort von Meßkirch. Die korrekte Adresse in OSM lautet daher
addr:city=Meßkirch
addr:suburb=Ringgenbach
Ich habe das so abgeändert. Auch habe ich den Gebäudeumriß anhand der amtlichen Karte Maps4BW (kann man im ID als Hintergrund einblenden) überarbeitet.
Grüße
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
shinjiman (2021-04-26 11:21:34+00:00): While adding the areas please do not  snap over to the road. It's hard to add the relation onto the road later such as bus routes or cycling routes.
mavl (2019-08-27 16:34:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
dgitto (2020-09-30 12:52:49+00:00): Ma è Parri Francesco o Ferruccio?
In italia poi i nomi di persona (nella toponomastica) vanno nome-cognome, non l'inverso. E le abbreviazioni sono da evitare
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Nomi#Abbreviazioni
mavl (2019-08-27 16:35:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
mavl (2019-08-27 16:33:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73806070 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3130].
PT-53 (2019-12-23 09:39:21+00:00): Hallo  Akkurator,
im OSM-Inspector wird für dieses Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/704376715/history
ein Hinweis"nonop_confusion_on_ways
" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.82421&lat=47.67891&zoom=18&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways
Ich halte
building=construction + construction=parking
und
amentiy=parking
für einen Widerspruch.
Ist das Parkhaus evtl. schon fertiggestellt? 
(opening_date=2019-10)
Weihnachtliche Grüße
Akkurator (2019-12-23 13:53:12+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Gute Frage, wie man amenities im Bau richtig taggt.
Das geht eigentlich nur mit lifecycle-prefix:
construction:amenity=parking

... und tatsächlich, so steht's auch im wiki als Beispiel: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

Ich habe das nun so umgetaggt und (zum zweiten Mal) das "im Bau" im name-tag entfernt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78776652


Kurz gegoogelt:
https://www.schwaebische.de/landkreis/landkreis-ravensburg/wangen_artikel,-darum-ist-das-wangener-erba-parkhaus-fertig-aber-noch-nicht-nutzbar-_arid,11147113.html
Stand 2019-11-23 fertig, aber noch nicht nutzbar. "Offizielle Eröffnung soll erst Ende des Jahres, spätestens zum Silvesterkonzert der Stadtkapelle in der Waldorfschule sein. "

Ich denke, man könnte es jetzt als eröffnet betrachten, aber OSMchecker wird's bestimmt updaten, sobald es in der Zeitung steht. Vermutlich muss man danach noch das ein oder andere Tag korrigieren...
Akkurator (2019-12-31 01:16:36+00:00): ... und genau so war es dann auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79035955