piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
René84828 (2026-01-23 11:44:31+00:00): Ist die Benutzung des Wanderweges wirklich für Fußgänger verboten aber für Radfahrer erlaubt? Das ergibt für mich keinen Sinn.
syntex (2021-09-29 18:15:17+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniłeś kszałty budynków na błędne?
maraf24 (2021-09-30 16:23:55+00:00): Błędne otagowanie: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865418148
Opis "aaaaa" jest niezgodny z zasadami.
Kandydat do rewertu.
syntex (2021-09-30 17:18:14+00:00): Wycofałem część tego zestawu zmian na Bemowie. Ale prawdopodobnie reszta jego zmian zarówno w tym zestawie zmian jak i w innych też jest "wątpliwej" jakości
syntex (2022-01-11 15:48:17+00:00): Ok odkryłem inne błędne zmiany tj przetagowywanie ścieżki pieszo rowerowej na chodnik
mueschel (2021-09-25 09:58:06+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong here: all the objects in this changeset are duplicates of existing objects. I reverted it.
user_1566574 (2021-09-30 13:58:39+00:00): highway=path au lieu de highway=footway me paraît plus adapté, non ?
gscholz (2021-09-30 04:48:30+00:00): Hi erickdeoliveiraleal,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Alfredo Lazo": 

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-86.35601&lat=13.07549&zoom=16

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111335556

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-10-08 20:21:08+00:00): fixed
Jakka (2021-09-18 08:01:38+00:00): voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dfarm pour améliorer votre edit.
mettez sur node intérieur bâtiment
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111335638
Eiim (2021-09-17 17:05:31+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap! It appears that you have deleted some paths and recreated them rather than just modifying them. In the future, try to just modify existing objects where possible rather than deleting and recreating them with the new features.
I am also not familiar with some of the tags you used. Can you explain what angle and surface_id mean? If you meant to indicate the grade/slope of the path, you should use "incline" instead. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline for more information.

Thanks,
Eiim
pio2_122 (2021-09-17 12:49:54+00:00): Wypada zapoznać się z treścią uchwały przed wprowadzeniem zmian:
„§ 3. Uchwała wchodzi w życie po upływie 14 dni od dnia ogłoszenia w Dzienniku Urzędowym
Województwa Zachodniopomorskiego” - uchwała nie została nawet ogłoszona w DUW...

Wycofane.
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:15:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:10:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
Poretsew (2021-09-19 19:47:41+00:00): Beste Tilia_J,
Ik ben even benieuwd hoe je aan de namen van deze sloten bent gekomen. Ik kan op Google wel een paar namen vinden, maar het is bij OSM belangrijk dat er licentievrije bronnen worden gebruikt en het liefst duidelijk worden aangegeven.
Mvg,
Jelle
Tilia_J (2021-09-20 19:28:54+00:00): Beste Jelle,

Ik ben actief voor de Stichting tot Behoud van de Veluwse Sprengen en Beken en ben in Januari 2019 begonnen met het overnemen van hun bekenatlas in Openstreetmap. Vanzelfsprekend heb ik hier toestemming voor. Vervolgens is dit ontaard in het in kaart brengen van de waterlopen op en rond de hele Veluwe. Zowel actueel als historisch.

Hierbij heb ik gebruik gemaakt van een grote hoeveelheid online en offline bronnen alsook raadplegen van contacten binnen de stichting. Daarnaast heb ik ook veel bevindingen gedaan die hun weg hebben gevonden richting de eigen bekenatlas, provincie Gelderland mogelijk ook andere partijen waaronder het waterschap

In die zin beschouw ik de ontstane samenhang als (afgeleid) eigen werk. Vandaar mijn bronvermelding "local knowledge"

Verreweg de meeste namen, etc. zijn ook terug te vinden in de actuele leggers van waterschap Vallei en Veluwe. De bijbehorende gebruiksvoorwaarden vermelden: "Deze data is openbaar beschikbaar en voor het gebruik van deze data gelden geen beperkingen"

https://valleienveluwe.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=271caf9deb7b458bb66d004a398a2bd7
Poretsew (2021-09-20 19:38:52+00:00): Dank voor de zeer duidelijke uitleg en fijn dat we een hele toegewijde bijdrager hebben. :)
Toch een tip: een korte omschrijving van de (externe) bron met URL voorkomt discussie over de herkomst van de informatie.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-03-24 10:40:14+00:00): Hey Tilia_J, 

Zou je alsjeblieft geen waterwegen aan landuse vast willen maken? Dit maakt het later bewerken van deze objecten namelijk veel lastiger dan nodig is. Zie bijvoorbeeld https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342326133.

Mvg,

Casper
Tilia_J (2022-03-24 11:25:37+00:00): Hier heb ik zelf ook een hekel aan. De door jou aangehaalde way was volgens mij onderdeel van een eerdere edit van jou en toen zat deze ook al vastgeplakt.

Of zie ik iets over het hoofd?

17-9-21 Tilia_J (deze change)
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111336536

30-06-20 Friendly_Ghost
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87355021
Friendly_Ghost (2022-03-24 11:46:49+00:00): Nu ik opnieuw kijk zie ik ook de volledige historie, en dit is zo te zien ooit Poretsew's werk geweest: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342326133/history
Sorry dat ik hier de verkeerde persoon op heb aangesproken ;)
渤海西岸 (2021-09-18 11:50:17+00:00): 别乱改
渤海西岸 (2021-09-18 11:51:10+00:00): 我们这里都是已经确认好了的
渤海西岸 (2021-09-18 11:54:52+00:00): 外地人/外国人不要乱动
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-09-19 04:39:30+00:00): Dear lorenzo23622:

At first I should thank you for your attention on China‘s road network, but maybe you've made some mistake such as ( www.openstreetmap.org/way/928321185 ). A local mapper PM me for this and he is very angry about this.

This is a provincial class road and according to the tagging guideline in China, it is a secondary highway. Many place have local mapper to maintain a road network, sometimes satellite map is out dated so you will think there haven't a road. 

You can communite with China community before make such kind of highway class change.

Best wishes.
快乐的老鼠宝宝
(A user who want to join DWG and hard working to reach this goal)
wkdgs (2021-09-17 15:04:58+00:00): Hallo,

hier gilt dasselbe wie bei deinem anderen Änderungssatz.

LG
winkeldings
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
wkdgs (2021-09-17 15:02:51+00:00): Hallo,

in deinem Kommentar hast du angegeben, dass die Höchstgeschwindigkeit am Wochende 50 ist. Du hast aber nur den maxspeed-Tag gelöscht, sodass diese Straße jetzt überhaupt keine Geschwindigkeitsinformationen mehr hat.

Wie man eine solche Höchstgeschwindigkeit einträgt findest du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed#Abh%C3%A4ngigkeit_von_anderen_Bedingungen

LG
winkeldings
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
syntex (2021-09-17 15:35:39+00:00): Dla różnych nawigacji wystarczy sam znacznik access=no, który już oznacza zakaz wstępu dla wszystkich, nie trzeba wtedy dodawać motor_vehicle=no czy foot=no
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
kapazao (2021-09-17 16:05:47+00:00): Hola, por favor trata de colocar los edificios con respecto a su base y utilizar imágenes PNOA para ello. Puedes usar también la capa de Catastro para dibujar con más precisión el edificio, pero siempre colócalo con PNOA.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111338279
jmty8 (2021-09-17 13:37:27+00:00): right hashtag - #mbx_germany_roads
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111338411
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
dvdhoven (2021-09-17 14:40:44+00:00): Nogmaals network:type=node_network gebruiken!!!!
Het barst weer van de fouten in knooppuntnet.nl
dvdhoven (2021-09-17 14:51:10+00:00): Knooppunten moeten lid worden gemaakt van het netwerk.
Vervallen knooppunten moeten uit het netwerk verwijderd worden.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SK53 (2023-01-03 16:58:20+00:00): Hi,

Is the bit of the Chiltern Loop along the service road to Stubbings Nursery a pavement or similar? I can't  exactly remember what it looked like before all the changes here.

Jerry aka SK53
Mikey Co (2023-01-03 17:29:11+00:00): Hello
It's a separate footpath. Indeed the mapping of the path and the service road isn't correct as the road is visibly (from the aerial photo) in the wrong place, while path leave the road and is on the other side of the woodland, next to the school grounds.
Mikey Co (2023-01-03 17:29:48+00:00): I will correct this based on the out of date aerial photo and my recollections
SK53 (2023-01-03 18:05:52+00:00): You can get more up-to-date aerials by using "https://ecn.t{switch:0,1,2,3}.tiles.virtualearth.net/tiles/a{u}.jpeg?g=587&n=z" in the Custom imagery. There's a bit of an odd thing about BIng imagery at the moment in the iD editor which it's getting hard to resolve. Also, if you don't know it, the cadastral parcel overlay often helps line things up.

I see your edit & makes perfect sense. I suspect it follows the old line climbing out of the cutting and then along the edge of the school.

I've been trying to add some footpath designations in Maidenhead Thicket (mainly from a survey 13 years ago). I've now moved permanently from the area and for some reason never did the Thicket thoroughly.
Mikey Co (2023-01-03 18:36:33+00:00): Thanks for that custom imagery link, that's really useful!
I'll tweak my mapping a bit based on it, as the path is out in the open
osmviborg (2021-09-17 14:46:44+00:00): Why name a single tree? That don't make sense. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
ragit (2021-09-18 08:34:50+00:00): Right. Use Case:

"As a user, I want to be able to search for æbletræ, and get a list of æbletræer."

Like I wrote, I simply want to enable finding this, and other apple trees with this search:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=æbletræ

Would adding "æbletræ" to another field work better?
osmviborg (2021-09-18 09:29:54+00:00): Nominatim, the OSM search tool is is a tool to search OSM data by name and address. If you want to search for 'æbletræ' try https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1bhc
ragit (2021-09-18 16:30:45+00:00): Thanks, overpass-turbo.eu could work, but doesn't look too user friendly ... I think searching via openstreetmap.org would be better, if at all possible. I will expand the Use Case:

"As a user, I want to be able to search on openstreetmap.org for æbletræ, and get a list of æbletræer."

Isn't that possible? Do you know which fields are searchable directly on openstreetmap.org?
osmviborg (2021-09-18 18:07:46+00:00): https://nominatim.org/release-docs/develop/
ragit (2021-09-19 16:11:09+00:00): Thanks! It looks like only street, city, county, state, country and postalcode are searched for via the openstreetmap.org search form.

I didn't realize your link was a shortened URL, to a search with extra parameters, so I found this shorter method for apple trees search at https://overpass-turbo.eu/ where the search is only the visible area:

node[description="æbletræ"] ({{bbox}});
out;

Your search, limited to Denmark:

// fetch area “Danmark” to search in
{{geocodeArea:Danmark}}->.searchArea;
// gather results
(
  // query part for: “description="æbletræ"”
  node["description"="æbletræ"](area.searchArea);
  way["description"="æbletræ"](area.searchArea);
  relation["description"="æbletræ"](area.searchArea);
);
// print results
out;
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
nurdafur (2023-01-02 08:41:36+00:00): Hallo skyper
Du hast hier an der Moselbrücke https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/321498539 und wohl auch noch an anderen Orten die Fahrradspuren zugefügt. Soviel ich weiss, braucht es dazu immer noch den Tag vehicles:lanes=*, bei dem die Spuren, die bicycle=designated sind auch noch vehicles=no bekommen.
Liebe Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartografieren 
Urs
skyper (2023-01-02 13:22:46+00:00): Hi Urs,
danke der Nachfrage. Normalerweise verwende ich `access:lanes` anstatt `vehicle:lanes`, aber das ist wohl Geschmackssache. Hier handelt es sich aber um einen Schutzstreifen und keinen exklusiven Fahrradstreifen, daher wäre `vehicle=no` falsch und "yes" ist default und damit unnötig.
Ist das nachvollziehbar?

Ebenso viel Spaß beim Mappen,
LG skyper
nurdafur (2023-01-02 14:28:38+00:00): Das Wiki sieht das anders als du. Gemäss dem Beispiel ganz rechts auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Radwege#Radfahrstreifen_in_Mittellage_.2F_Fahrradschleuse_.2F_Fahrradweichen ist auch bei einem Fahrradstreifen in Mittellage der als Advisory gilt die Fahrspur für Autos als Bicycle=no und der Radstreifen als vehicle=no zu kennzeichnen. Access:lanes zu benutzen finde ich übrigens nicht optimal. Das inkludiert dann ja auch foot.
skyper (2023-01-02 15:13:06+00:00): Das Beispiel zeigt ein Fahrradstreifen (exklusive) mit gestrichelten Fahrbahnmarkierungen zum Überqueren. Leider fehlen auf allen die DE:237 und "advisory" bzw "exclusive" sind nicht erwähnt.
Auf exklusiven Radstreifen hat außer Fahrräder kein anderes Transportmittel inklusive der eigenen Füße was zu suchen. `vehicle` vergisst dann zusätzlich noch `horse`.
nurdafur (2023-01-02 16:25:17+00:00): Ich sehe, wir sind uns da definitiv nicht einig.
Ein Fahrradstreifen ist gemäß der Definition dann exklusive wenn er durch eine ausgezogene Linie von der Fahrbahn getrennt ist und advisory, wenn die Linie gestrichelt ist. In den oben verlinkten Beispielen ist die Linie, wie du richtig gesehen hast, gestrichelt und somit advisory. Die Farbe hat keinen Einfluss. Hier bei meiner Partnerin vor der Haustüre gibt es einen benutzungspflichtigen Radweg mit entsprechend ausgezogener Linie. Dieser muss aber von Autos überquert werden, damit die Straßenrandparkplätze  erreicht werden können.
So, genug geschrieben, denn wie gesagt, wir werden uns da nicht einig.
Ich wünsche dir noch einen schönen Abend.