piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ndm (2019-12-03 22:44:03+00:00): Does this still have any signage for Niche Frames? Is it still a shop?

Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office. 

The names have only been removed fro mthe map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building.
ndm (2019-12-03 22:42:26+00:00): Does this still have any signage for Ceres? Is it still a restaurant?

Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office. 

The names have only been removed from the map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building.
ndm (2019-12-03 22:41:37+00:00): Does this still have any signage for Bristol Office Furniture? Is it still a shop? Are the contact detalis still relevant?

Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office. 

The names have only been removed fro mthe map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building.
ndm (2019-12-03 22:40:26+00:00): Does this still have any signage for Seabright printers?

Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office. 

The names have only been removed fro mthe map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building.
ndm (2019-12-03 22:39:37+00:00): Does this still have any signage for avon law centre? Is it still an office?

Generally, local Bristol mappers have been leaving signed names on buildings and just marking them as disused:amenity / disused:shop / disused:office. 

The names have only been removed fro mthe map when the last signage has disappeared from the physical building.
mueschel (2019-12-05 11:44:38+00:00): Hi,
please check this relation, it doesn't have any valid tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10367463
abrensch (2019-12-08 09:25:06+00:00): Hallo Hemlut,

hier ist Dir wohl ein Missgeschick passiert (falsche one-ways):

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/752013898
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/751881460

Gruss, Arndt
vanagaudi (2019-12-08 15:05:36+00:00): Hallo Arndt
Danke für die Aufmerksamkeit. Habe es korrigiert und gleich noch ein paar Abbiegeregeln hinzugefügt.
Viele Grüße
Helmut
pyram (2019-12-18 18:30:02+00:00): Ich habe die Matthias-Erzberger-Straße wieder in der früheren Version hergestellt.
Bitte keine Straßen löschen, nur um sie einen Meter daneben neu zu zeichnen. Das macht die Historie ziemlich unübersichtlich und es sieht so aus, als ob Du Ortskenntnis hättest...
Einfach die Nodes verschieben reicht doch völlig aus!?

Gruß
pyram
Polarbear (2020-05-15 20:59:08+00:00): Du wurdest hier bereits gebeten, die History von Objekten nicht zu löschen, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

Leider machst du das immer wieder: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/83813753
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80932404
viloan (2019-12-03 20:45:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-12-04 06:14:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your parking lot area. You take some very unusual keys for the information.
viloan (2019-12-03 21:00:46+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mariotomo (2020-02-29 14:31:24+00:00): hi.  tertiary/unclassified/residential … In Panama we still have no official base to say that.  I have proposed to discuss this in the wiki, I hope to read more opinions there, and to reach an agreement that we can follow.  otherwise we keep changing back and forth only based on opinions.
DeBigC (2020-02-16 04:18:16+00:00): I think the building is really a truck trailer used for advertising tourism services - see Mapillary
ted3sco (2019-12-03 21:47:10+00:00): Appreciate the help, but I noticed my mistake and was in the middle of fixing it. I was saving and got an error with synchronizing(didn't knew why, but this edit explains it).
A comment first would've been useful.

Thanks anyway, no need to respond to this.
BCNorwich (2019-12-04 07:28:07+00:00): Hi, Is there a physical presence here, like an shop/office that customers can visit? Or is this an online only business?

If it's online only then the shop tag should be removed.

Regards Bernard.
mavl (2019-12-06 19:24:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78068790, 78065244, 78067045, 78062691 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Tomas Straupis (2019-12-04 06:25:22+00:00): Atstačiau teisingą tvenkinio žymėjimą - landuse=reservoir. Nereikia keisti į natural=water+water=reservoir.
aš aš (2019-12-04 14:03:25+00:00): Kai kur rašoma "upgrade the tags", dėl to pasirodė kad reikia pakeisti.
Tomas Straupis (2019-12-04 14:32:21+00:00): Taip, suprantu. Saugiausia yra neklausyti, ką iD redaktorius siūlo.
O vėliau, įpratus, idealu pereiti prie tikro redaktoriaus - JOSM.
BCNorwich (2019-12-04 07:28:30+00:00): Hi, Is there a physical presence here, like an shop/office that customers can visit? Or is this an online only business?

If it's online only then the shop tag should be removed.

Regards Bernard.
Markus366 (2019-12-03 22:02:36+00:00): Ich habe nicht den Eindruck, dass du meine Hinweise ernst nimmst. Die neuen Edits sind nicht besser als die vorherigen. Ich habe daher dein Benutzerprofil wegen der Edits in Bilshausen und Lindau gemeldet.

Ich schlage dir ernsthaft vor, mit neuen Einträgen zu warten, bis sich jemand bei dir gemeldet hat.
Digikiller123 (2019-12-07 21:02:47+00:00): Was kann man den falsch machen, wenn man die Spielplätze markiert?
maraf24 (2019-12-04 00:16:11+00:00): Proszę o sensowne opisywanie swoich zestawów zmian: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Good_changeset_comments
user_5359 (2019-12-04 05:36:00+00:00): Hello! Please note: A relation is only necessary if more than one object is combined. 
Or to put it another way: A boundary relation is only necessary if two areas have a common border.
JamesChevalier (2019-12-09 16:29:30+00:00): I'm unsure how to comprehend this (I'm new to many OSM details). It doesn't _seem_ to align with what I've seen in OSM so far.
I've got a project where I'm collecting Streets (with their Nodes) within Cities. In my experience so far, a "City" is generally defined as a relation at admin level 8 (it varies from region to region; where regions are _usually_ at admin level 4, but those also vary across Countries - which I've seen consistently exist at admin level 2).
With - so far - 100% consistency, every city I've come across in OSM exists as a relation.
I'm probably misunderstanding something, so hopefully sharing my point of view helps you explain your point in a way that I'll understand it.
user_5359 (2019-12-09 16:48:31+00:00): Not quite. 
Cities are areas marked with admin_level=8. A relation only comes into play when the surrounding line of the area cannot be drawn as a continuous line. This should always be the case if several borders meet each other, but unfortunately in America many borders were imported blind. In case two city areas collide, two overlapping lines are often drawn here, enough to draw only one line, which marks the common border between the two cities.

In other words: For your evaluation it is not relevant that it is a relation, but that the line has the mark admin_level=8, no matter if path or relation. I suppose you use the Overpass-Turbo.eu page for such queries?
JamesChevalier (2019-12-09 20:55:38+00:00): Yeah, I've built out my own Overpass server to avoid over-loading theirs. I query by area, which (as I understand it) is based on relations (the OSM relation ID + 3600000000 gives me the Overpass area ID).
Apologies for keeping the conversation going, but I still don't see a way around using a relation. I also don't see how it can be a bad thing, if (in my experience) every other city I've ever seen in OSM is a relation.

(text can be hard, I'm genuinely interested in getting this right - not trying to be argumentative)
viloan (2019-12-03 22:10:43+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Carto'Cité (2019-12-18 12:53:26+00:00): Salut,
Merci pour cet ajout :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
E de Wit (2019-12-03 22:44:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77726561
ACarlotti (2019-12-04 17:35:26+00:00): I think this changeset is rather misleading and confusing - the road isn't open yet, you've deleted some of the under-construction bits leaving a strange gap, and made it difficult to work out what's happening near the Swavesey junction. I think it should still be mapped as under construction until Sunday length - there's certainly no reason I can see to partly 'open' it now.
ACarlotti (2019-12-05 03:03:57+00:00): There was some discussion of the A14 bypass opening here, in which it was recommended that it isn't marked as open in OpenStreetMap until Monday morning. This recommendation was seemingly ignored. I suggest reverting changesets 77903602, 77902225 and 77902052 to get back to map data that is more accurate for the present, and to fix various other minor issues introduced in those changesets.
ACarlotti (2019-12-04 18:37:02+00:00): highway=motorway_junction was correct - this tag is used even where the road in question isn't actually a motorway.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction

Also, when splitting a way, try to preserve the history on the most substantial/significant portion of the way. In this case you kept the history on the tiny stub you created near Swavesey. (I disagree with splitting that way as well, but that's probably better discussed on your earlier changeset.)
user_5359 (2019-12-04 04:42:59+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Ist das eine Geschäft https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop, ein Büro https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:office oder ein Handwerker https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft ?
eggie (2019-12-06 11:29:36+00:00): Rendering eendenkooi hersteld.Water op bos dat gaat niet. dan rendert het door elkaar. Het zijn hier niet voor niets allemaal multipolygonen.
Waarom zo'n eendenkooi helemaal veranderd?? 
Gr eggie
hobbesvsboyle (2019-12-23 17:08:05+00:00): It looks like you significantly shortened Morrill Road in this changeset. I can see that we you cut it off, the road changes from what looks like a regular paved road to something that's more narrow and unpaved, but it's definitely still some kind of way (could be private?). Can you provide some more info why you cut short the road?
hogrod (2019-12-25 11:09:36+00:00): I was removing a non-existent road from the map. These are downright dangerous being mapped and can route people incorrectly. Removal is more important than getting the exact details back in place in a case like this. Morrill Road is only a dead end road on the south end, it doesn't exist on the north at all. 

I have completed some edits here so have included the private track roads back in this area.
hobbesvsboyle (2019-12-25 14:40:29+00:00): Thanks, appreciate it!
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:39:44+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719968

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
s8evq (2019-12-05 10:03:40+00:00): Hello Paul-Andre,
The route you made is a duplicate. It already existed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/946614
It would be nice if you remove yours.
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-29 13:58:21+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
BCNorwich (2019-12-29 10:41:41+00:00): Hi, 
The buildings in this changeset do not appear on the Bing imagery you seem to have used.
Further I see a great many buildings, parks and wetlands you've mapped that are not on Bing imagery. Features on OSM must be verifiable,can you state the true source of your information please?
If these features are fiction please remove them.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2020-01-15 18:19:20+00:00): No response so I've removed all the fiction. 
This done in Changeset: 79617384
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:38:11+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719951
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
G1asshouse (2019-12-07 08:26:17+00:00): I have surveyed the area and found a physical barrier, in the center of the intersection, supports the turn restrictions this changeset removed. Could you please revert the changeset.
G1asshouse (2019-12-07 10:03:07+00:00): Disregard. I figured out my how the edits went. My mistake.
Olla_Ko (2019-12-05 10:44:15+00:00): Hi, Nurunnajmi!
Your edits look like fictional. There are no any proofs of existence of all these features on images. Could you please provide any details? In another case, I will be forced to revert your changesets.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77904592
Mazda05 (2019-12-10 22:17:01+00:00): Владимир К, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office Поправьте, пожалуйста name и addr:city
Владимир К (2019-12-14 12:58:47+00:00): Спасибо, что обратили внимание.
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:36:42+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719922

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Frans S (2019-12-18 13:35:37+00:00): Hello Hector. Thanks for mapping here
A request. Please pay more attention to square the buildings you map. On this task 69 out of 72 buildings you have mapped are not squared. Use the Q key every time after mapping a building (should be selected)
Best regards
dieterdreist (2022-01-10 11:32:04+00:00): Hi, I just wanted to let you know in this changeset you somehow ended up with a broken multipolygon relation (only inner ways). Maybe this is an iD-editor bug?
Relation 106272
pangoSE (2019-12-06 07:31:50+00:00): Hej, här har du också använt LM topo verkar det som. Kan du sluta med att ändra på byggnader utifrån en olämplig källa?
LM topo är bra för vattendrag, namn på sjöar och några andra saker men deras byggnader stämmer inte altid med verkligheten.
Birger Canerstam (2019-12-06 07:48:51+00:00): Hejsan!
Majoriteten av dom ändringar jag gjort på byggnader är utifrån lokalkännedom då jag rör mig i områdena. Och av dom kartor som fanns som hjälpmedel så var det LM topo som överensstämde i dessa fall 

Kommer dubbelkolla mina ändringar under helgen för att säkerställa att de stämmer.
eggie (2019-12-04 07:48:07+00:00): Beste padvinder... Zou je het gebied van je edits kleiner kunnen houden om schade aan de kaart te voorkomen. 

MVG,
Eggie
aharvey (2019-12-04 05:30:26+00:00): generally I'll try to align the way with where the center line of the road is and then use the placement tag to be explicit with where this is in relation to the lane tags. Is there a particular reason here for shifting these ways away from the painted centerline of the road?
inas (2019-12-04 05:43:59+00:00): Hey Andrew.  Surely an admirable goal, and one that is quite easily applied to most streets (and you will see in this changeset, that all of Johnson Street is so mapped).  However, through Albert St, we have overlapping left and right turn lanes that in my view if mapped strictly along the centre line may not reflect the straight nature of through traffic.  Still, in response to your comment I have remapped these sections, and while not strictly on the centre line, hopefully are a better compromise between this and the actual topology.
aharvey (2019-12-04 06:04:16+00:00): Thanks. I've added a few extra placement tags here so if you turn on the "Lane and road attributes" Map paint style in JOSM the lane visualisations line up with what's on the imagery.
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:34:52+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719895

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:33:33+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719875

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
mavl (2019-12-04 09:01:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 70815353, 70815686, 70815741, 70816018, 70816109, 70816132, 70816700, 70817178, 70817252, 70817342, 70817402, 70817483, 70817548, 70817572, 70817664, 70817688, 70817718, 70818296, 70820543, 70820720, 70820849, 70820972, 70821157, 70821700, 70821781, 70823604, 70823722, 70823743, 70823926, 70824065, 70829234, 70829664, 70830332, 70830378, 70830569, 70830741, 70830872, 70832094, 70832151, 70832274, 70833519, 70833579, 70834413, 70834825, 70838186, 70838313, 70838582, 70838656, 70839305, 70839941, 70841511, 70851720, 70852449, 70853319, 70854006, 70854713, 70855250, 70855676, 70855978, 70856680, 70856848, 70893055, 70893170, 70932420, 70937622, 70962138, 70963283, 70963441, 70963773, 70963890, 70963933, 70965565, 70967727, 70967943, 70967999, 70996665, 71000170, 71032855, 71035698, 71057567, 71067559, 71069104, 71071370, 71071555, 71071924, 71074188, 71079093, 71112751, 71144964, 71150490, 71154780, 71167411, 71168811, 71179015, 71274557, 71376897, 71378111, 71410348, 71415139, 71453985, 71454217, 71494879, 71504775, 71506928, 71507497, 71571149, 71574853, 71610251, 71612604, 71645989, 71650010, 71650736, 71684223, 71684384, 71736302, 71738524, 71740720, 71742174, 71743429, 71750327, 71752013, 71752906, 71791720, 71905224, 71955870, 71958518, 71960338, 71976164, 71978434, 71981687, 72088780, 72088905, 72207063, 72209358, 72209526, 72209651, 72214317, 72217903, 72228037, 72231113, 72234541, 72357153, 72443574, 72443676, 72444236, 72698800, 72698888, 72787280, 73549602, 73553218, 73590251, 73592348, 73593763, 73638180, 73683186, 73684528, 73692876, 73696689, 73698930, 73714531, 73717303, 73720386, 73720745, 73723122, 73765872, 73811181, 73944342, 73944789, 73945242, 74052768, 74053544, 74092543, 74101265, 74101909, 74168988, 74175861, 74176548, 74211918, 74212132, 74221930, 74223821, 75310902, 75312647, 75313649, 75314081, 75314204, 75314448, 75314640, 75429965, 75618813, 75619593, 75619922, 76842524.
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:32:30+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719852

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:31:05+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719829

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:29:44+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719803

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:28:08+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719769

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:25:45+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719736

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:23:20+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719699


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:21:23+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719662

 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:10:27+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719492

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2019-12-21 19:08:02+00:00): DWG revert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78719461


Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
GeoJess (2020-09-08 22:00:47+00:00): Hi fadiq umar,

Thanks for all of your contributions to OSM! I noticed that a lot of the buildings in this changeset are not visible in the imagery source based from the changeset information. Please kindly review the area to check for buildings that need adjustments. Let me know if my message is unclear and if there is anything else I can help with.

Regards,
Jesspher