piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
*Martin* (2020-02-16 13:12:33+00:00): Ano, to je aj moja otazka :-). Mne to pride podstatne lahsie pre routovac, dokonca prirodzene, kedze pre pesie routovanie maju chodniky vyssiu vahu ako cesty a tak su automaticky preferovane. Avsak renderovac nema ako zistit ci pre danu cestu neexistuje nablizku vhodny chodnik. To by musel obsahovat aj routovac.

Tiez mi napadlo, ze na mnohych cestach je dokonca subjektivne, ci ich este moze chodec pouzit alebo nie. Niektory policajt povie ze OK, najblizsia obchadzka po chodniku je "az" 10 minut peso a iny policajt povie ze je "len" 10 minut peso. Pripadne niekto je viac mobilnejsi, niekto menej a policajt moze posudzovat podla toho. Tym padom aj foot=no na mnohych tychto cestach moze byt casto subjektivne a tym padom IMHO nevhodne davat do OSM.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-26 05:12:11+00:00): What is the meaning of cosmha=yes tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48374970/history ?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 16:27:55+00:00): ¿Son correctos el tipo y el nombre? esto existe?
ChrissW-R1 (2025-06-01 12:23:36+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4785183
changchun_1 (2015-10-02 07:31:56+00:00): Hallo lutzr69 der von dir erstellte Spielplatz geht flächenmäßig nicht bis zur Straße. Habe auch eine Note erstellt. http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/444635
Auch der Fußweg dort endet auf einem Fahrradweg ohne Berechtigung für Fußgänger. Bitte schau dir das mal an.
Gruß
Matthias
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-27 14:39:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49338650/history

why you added project=OTI_HRI_COSMHA_STM020 tag there? Is it safe to remove such tags, in your opinion?
pitscheplatsch (2024-02-06 19:26:32+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/147144911
mipedso (2017-02-24 10:44:19+00:00): ah, alles umgebaut ?
user_5359 (2016-11-18 09:55:02+00:00): Hallo Dein Ein Eintrag von den Schießstätten Schöppelnberg ist schon etwas länger her, aber hast Du etwas dagegen, dass wir den Schützverein mit club=sport, sporting=shooting (wie jetzt üblicher ist) kennzeichnen?
anderfo (2016-09-28 09:56:15+00:00): Hey,
are you aware that when you tagged this trail with bicycle=no and ski=no you are telling that it is strictly forbidden to use skis or a bicycle along the trail? Or did you misunderstand the access tags?

It is rather common to misunderstand the access tags (e.g. bicycle, foot, horse, ski and snowmobile) and interpret them as an "advice" as to what is suitable for the trail, but that is the wrong interpretation. It is only about legal access...

Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access and tell me if I should remove all the access tags you put on this trail, or let me know if it is actually forbidden to cycle, ski or ride a horse on this trail so I should let them stay there.

best regards,
  Anders
anderfo (2016-09-28 09:59:11+00:00): PS. Please write more than "Ergänzungen" (additions/updates) on your changesets. Write instead something about what you actually did:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Why_should_I_use_Changeset_Comments.3F
GerdP (2015-11-14 20:58:03+00:00): please review:
I assume surface=b stands for beton?
way 170511971,way 170511974,way 170511973,way 170511978,way 170511977,way 23136293
brianboru (2015-11-16 19:53:05+00:00): I have no idea - I must have a had  brainfart when editing this. Just delete the tag
GerdP (2015-11-16 20:05:28+00:00): :-)
done
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:27:42+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170665413
has no tags. What is it?
eric22 (2017-03-28 19:41:43+00:00): Made it into a wadi. There might also be a trail there, but I don't know so I didn't put it.
luschi (2015-02-18 20:12:12+00:00): These LPG imports come from a dubious source.
Deleted
naoliv (2016-06-09 12:57:54+00:00): Ulf, "região Montenegro" is where Jessé Guimarães is located, it's an alt_name or it's the area name? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1818437900
mrpulley (2022-04-25 01:03:31+00:00): Just letting you know that your 'test' edits here have been removed - one was already removed, I removed the other last night.
canfe (2019-04-12 08:35:30+00:00): Cascina Peppinella e Castello dei Laghi nella Mandria non mi sembrano la stessa cosa e non nello stesso posto.
Talitha IRM-ED (2021-05-07 04:11:34+00:00): Hi, LungSabai. I deleted this building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/170827705) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. Thank you
Talitha IRM-ED (2021-05-07 04:13:42+00:00): Hi, LungSabai. I deleted this building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/170828937) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. Thank you
eggie (2017-07-28 06:31:42+00:00): Dave... na vijf jaar weer een bijdrage. Opnieuw welkom dus.  Ik stuur je per PB de welkomstmail die iedereen ontvangt.
Nakaner (2017-04-25 07:57:52+00:00): Hi Nobody229,

you added the interior of a bunker in this and two other changesets. Some members of the German OSM forum doubt whether there are legal sources to add this information to OSM. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=642717#p642717


Could you please explain which sources you used to add this facility to OpenStreetMap?

Best regards

Michael
Anu_Zade (2020-04-30 21:02:05+00:00): Hello dufekin, 

My name is Anu and I work as a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. While mapping in this area, I found some discrepancies regarding St Ferdinand St way/12633005, way/181653702 and way/181653709. Each of these has been modeled as oneway =yes. Looking at the history of these ways you added directionality on 12 July 2012 for this changeset/12193906. St Ferdinand St starts from the intersection of North Boulevard (node/115263476) until South Boulevard intersection (node/1821126612). According to Mapillary street side Imagery 2018, presently the street is bi-directional. Along with this change, we need to change directionality for Saint Louis Street which needs to be updated from a oneway to a bi-directional way as it runs parallel to St Ferdinand St from South Boulevard until North Boulevard. Again, directionality was added on 15 July 2012 for this changeset/12182556. Can you please revert both changesets, and correct the changes to reflect the current state of imagery? Or if you have another recent source that discounts this change, could you please provide further information on this? 

Thank you,
Anu_lyft
kreuzschnabel (2018-02-22 09:09:04+00:00): I strongly suppose that "Cleveland Way" is not the name of the paths or tracks themselves but of the hiking route using them (the relation of which bears the name). So, the paths should not have a name=* tag at all unless they really have a specific name on their own. Could you change this back?
Matija Nalis (2023-03-30 19:34:41+00:00): Hi, I've noticed you've used undocumented "camp=yes" tag here. I'm trying to document known usages at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp - can you help what you meant here? Maybe amenity=refugee_site or something else? (what is "IFO camp"?)
Harry Wood (2023-03-31 10:48:00+00:00): I don't remember very well, but I can see what happened here. I created an area  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171166746 representing this little side offshoot of the big refugee camp ("IFO camp") to the east https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/467513806/history and I copied the same tags that had been applied there for consistency (see version 1). That tagging was changed 3 years ago (improved/simplified I guess), but unfortunately without changing my little offshoot area. 
...so I shall change it now (including removing the camp=yes tag)
aharvey (2017-06-16 12:04:33+00:00): I'm not sure about UNSW as a neighbourhood, UNSW is a university area and it's already tagged as a university. So I'm tempted to remove https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1822379544
Anisa IRM-ED (2022-12-20 02:09:35+00:00): Hi, LungSabai. Your edit looks awesome.
I delete a reservoir (pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/171194571) because does not exist in Maxar imagery and Bing Aerial imagery currently. if there's any update on this area and you have any other suggestions, please let me know. Thank you and happy mapping!
Martin Borsje (2017-12-20 20:51:49+00:00): Hi Radler,

I observed you have drawn a lot of fences and wals in Aachenquartier as separation between gardens of houses. You might think this looks nice; but are al these based in true observations? On hires Dutch aerial foto's I can often not see any walls where you have drawn these.

Appreciate your comment; German reading is OK for me! :-)
nammala (2017-05-29 06:28:27+00:00): Hi iamsid,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding valuable data to the map. But noticed that you have been adding some data based on proprietary sources :
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1824367470/history
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171388855/history
OSM is the real map of the world and adding data based on using proprietary sources is not at all encouraged. Read this wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ for more information.  Make sure you continue adding valuable data to the map and let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Best Regards,
nammala
marc__marc (2021-02-20 15:29:41+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171412914
je cherche à documenter sur le wiki en quoi consiste la variante bretonne, as-tu des infos ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Thomas Clavier (2021-02-21 21:16:33+00:00): J'ai du mal à voir de quoi tu parles, c'était un énorme changeset :-)
Alan Bragg (2017-07-04 14:40:38+00:00): Thanks for breaking up these ways. It made it a lot easier for me to add road names from new TIGER data.
DAF06 (2019-03-26 19:56:45+00:00): Bestaat niet meer 
Is nu de m37
eggie (2020-01-03 12:25:10+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage. weliswaar met vraagtekens. 

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-29 01:03:34+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1825440040 for motorhomes or dog waste?
Peilscheibe (2015-04-29 06:44:21+00:00): This facility is designed for motorhomes
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-29 07:54:42+00:00): Thanks for clarifying.  Very similar tags are used for dog waste.
GerdP (2015-11-02 14:38:44+00:00): please review 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2280918
It was tagged highway=memorial,
I've changed that to historic=memorial.
Maybe you have a name for it?
sw_uwu (2024-08-02 23:46:17+00:00): Hi, warum ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25049919 als park getagged? Es gibt dort keinerlei man-made features.
Michi (2024-08-03 14:52:23+00:00): Hi,

puh, das ist 12 Jahre her. ;-)

Schlussendlich ist es eine Wiese, auf der im Sommer gern mal sonnengebadet und gegrillt wird, man muss sich nur vor der Hundekacke in Acht nehmen. Viel Vegetation ist da ja auch drauf, vielleicht wäre landuse=grass das bessere Tag...
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-29 18:11:06+00:00): Please check https://osm.org/note/4594023
ChrissW-R1 (2025-05-28 20:14:30+00:00): Please check fixme in https://osm.org/node/1825813421/history/5
loveshack (2021-01-15 21:40:34+00:00): I meant to ask about this ancient changeset some time ago.
There are two streams north of the Oakley estate.  You labelled the more northerly one Wyman's Brook.  Do you have any idea why, at this juncture?  Streetview and NLS 6" say Wyman's Brook is the one that borders the estate (whose route NLS Bartholemews shows across town until it joins up before Pittville).  I should take some exercise to collect addresses on the estate sometime, and could maybe see if there's any sort of labelling on the footbridge.
Kjarrval (2016-08-15 15:37:35+00:00): It seems that this changeset mistakenly put Árgil as the name of a lot of streets. I know this changeset was submitted about four years ago but I must ask: Do you know why it might have happened?
Glassman (2016-12-29 06:29:08+00:00): Should Freezland Rock be a separate country with admin level 2 borders? I can't find any reference to Freezland as a country.
Zecke (2016-12-29 08:35:36+00:00): Should be part of South Sandwich Islands which are Britisch Overseas territory according to Wikipedia. It's long ago but I'm sure I just copied tagging from surrounding islets at that time.
GerdP (2015-10-26 15:17:56+00:00): please review:
I found a few ways tagged 
highway=turning_loop 
This tag is meant for nodes only,
so I change them where I find them.
msevilla00 (2016-08-20 21:11:48+00:00): Las "calles secundarias" del camping Playa Joyel, ¿no deberían de ir como highway=living_street?
cronoser (2025-03-06 19:07:50+00:00): entiendo que son de servicio interno del camping.
msevilla00 (2025-04-27 08:43:37+00:00): si, son internas del camping... hace 13 años debí pensar que era mejor esa nomenclatura/etiqueta ... a saber
anderfo (2023-05-11 10:08:52+00:00): Hei, ser at dette er 11 år siden, men uansett: 
Stemmer det at det er forbudt å sykle på disse stiene, slik du la det inn? Du har brukt bicycle=dismount som betyr at man _må_ leie sykkelen og kan ikke f.eks. sitte på den verken oppover eller nedover.

Både bicycle- og foot-taggen gjelder kun adgang/access (foot=yes er derfor implisitt på stier og skal kun brukes hvis det er andre grunner til å tro at det er forbudt å gå på stien/vegen).

Hvis poenget her var å angi at det er vanskelig eller umulig å sykle på denne stien, angir man det heller med andre tagger som mtb:scale og class:bicycle:mtb :)

Anders
alphensebezorger (2016-05-03 18:02:50+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2283682 is marked as landuse=recreation_ground. Was that intentional? It seems rather watery for something named ground.
datalogg (2016-05-03 21:32:38+00:00): You're right, that's a mistake. The recreational_ground should only refer to the water playground area.
utack (2016-01-19 16:39:06+00:00): Hi.
shop=bike does not exist.
Is it a shop=bicycle or shop=motorcycle?

Cheers
suslikk (2016-01-20 06:32:20+00:00): It is shop=motorcycle.
utack (2016-01-20 10:26:03+00:00): Cool, thanks for checking
PT-53 (2021-08-14 06:39:50+00:00): Hallo,
hätte bei diesem Weg (?)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38120171/history
nicht auch die Linie gelöscht werden?
Fragende Grüße

Gefunden mit OSMI:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.28309&lat=47.98445&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags
goodidea (2018-03-22 18:50:33+00:00): Gibt es einen Grund, warum hier ganz vielen Straßen (nur in Deutschland?) eine Menge von access-Keys zugewiesen wurde, die nach den implizit geltenden Zugangsbeschränkungen unnötig sind? z.B. access=yes, foot=yes, bicycle=yes, horse=yes. Das führt doch nur zu überfrachteten Tags.
AndresDuhour (2021-06-03 11:41:00+00:00): Buen día! Puede ser que el tramo de Túpac Amaru entre Cortejarena y Sánchez sea Estanislao del Campo? Estaba revisando que los dos tramos están acentuados distinto y me surgió esa duda. Saludos!
AgusQui (2021-06-03 12:23:10+00:00): Se supone que Florencio Sánchez es un "cambianombres" pero no lo revisé personalmente así que puede que esté mal.
AndresDuhour (2021-06-03 13:33:20+00:00): Mientras no lo podamos revisar voy a unificar la acentuación. En algunas fuentes vi que se escribe Túpac amaru: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C3%BApac_Amaru
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:56:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107278850/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
az09 (2019-12-18 08:10:42+00:00): Привет. Хотелось бы узнать про osm.org/way/50875364 из чего следует что эта ветка не используется? Вроде на http://osmz.ru/imagery/#18/53.49172/123.88674/mp станция Рейново просматривается отлично, видно что путевое развитие задействовано
trolleway (2019-12-18 09:57:00+00:00): Ну везде написано, что на ней движение закрылось в нулевых, и всё.
https://periskop.su/1640359.html
az09 (2019-12-22 19:30:19+00:00): жаль не получится сейчас предъявить максар, но там в одном месте я даже какие-то то ли моторвагончики, то ли ж/д автобус разглядел (правда не конкретно на этом way, а между Лесной и Сковородино). а за ссылку спасибо, интересно!
trolleway (2019-12-23 10:01:40+00:00): ну в общем свидетельств о том что линия заброшена больше, чем о том, что она работает
Constable (2017-12-18 10:01:51+00:00): please see http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1241278
Maybe you'll be able to fix this up
thanks
Mariusz Dykierek (2022-11-17 12:46:23+00:00): DTŚ nie jest drogą ekspresową. motorroad=yes wydaje się być nieuprawnione. Natomiast na pewno trzeba dodać access foot=no tam gdzie nie ma chodników wzdłuż drogi.
dzamper (2022-11-18 07:34:39+00:00): motorroad=yes wcale nie oznacza że dana droga jest ekspresową i dodatkowo implikuje foot=no, więc nie bardzo rozumiem ten komentarz
Mariusz Dykierek (2022-11-18 08:35:00+00:00): W zamierzeniu to właśnie miał oznaczać - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorroad. To że implikuje ograniczenia podobne jak na autostradzie to rzecz przydatna. Wpisałem też buga na OsmAnd, że tego taga olewa i prowadzi pieszych po DTŚce. Niczemu to nie szkodzi, więc możesz to zignorować.
Mariusz Dykierek (2022-11-18 09:05:48+00:00): Jako ciekawostkę dodam, że OSRM też ignoruje motorroad i spokojnie prowadzi pieszych przez tunel w Katowicach.
maraf24 (2022-11-18 09:13:39+00:00): Osmand stosuje się do ograniczeń z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions
Jak tam widać, przy Polsce motorroad nie występuje.
U nas ten tag nie był zbyt znany ani często stosowany, może to dlatego. Dlatego najlepiej jest dodawać do dróg dodatkowo normalne tagi access.
Mariusz Dykierek (2022-11-18 09:38:02+00:00): OsmAnd sprawdziłem w Badenii-Wirtembergii i spokojnie pieszego prowadzi B464, więc bug jest.
maraf24 (2022-11-18 09:52:42+00:00): Jak na stronie tagu napisano "Due to unreliable software support, consider supplementing this key with explicit tags about access restrictions, speed limits, etc." :)
Mariusz Dykierek (2022-11-18 09:56:09+00:00): To chyba potrzeba nam ochotnika, który botem to doda.
Mariusz Dykierek (2022-11-19 12:48:55+00:00): Po akcji z dziećmi na DTŚ jeszcze refleksja mi przyszła - DTŚ formalnie nie jest drogą ekspresową. Na większości wjazdów, może wszystkich jest "trójzakaz" ale już nie na wszystkich są znaki zakazujące ruchu pieszych. Może ktoś mądrzejszy ode mnie powie kto spieprzył - Ci od znaków, czy "my" dając motorroad lub foot=no?
alessandrocarmeli (2021-05-06 21:19:40+00:00): è corretto il tag school?
damjang (2021-05-06 22:20:43+00:00): Prima era amenity=school adesso cascafico l'ha cambiato in landuse=school. Direi di si.
uvi (2016-12-24 11:29:05+00:00): Hallo skar, du hast vor einigen Jahren viel Arbeit in die Erfassung des FUSION-Festivalgeländes gesteckt. Bitte beachte doch mal diese Diskussion: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4195500326 Es wäre doch schade, wenn aus den dort genannten Gründen eine Löschung erfolgt und die Daten verloren wären. Beste Grüße und ein Frohes Fest
Uwe
skar (2016-12-24 11:57:06+00:00): Hallo Uwe, leider kann ich unter dem angegebenen Link keine Diskussion finden. Worum geht es genau?
Viele Grüße und auch schöne Feiertage,
Adrian
Prince Kassad (2016-12-24 12:14:42+00:00): Das war wohl der falsche Link. Der richtige ist hier:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=623784#p623784
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-14 04:21:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251154876 Do you know if this is still under construction? Imagery is inconclusive
SomeoneElse (2023-03-06 20:35:40+00:00): Now (10 years later!) that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042413994 exists, is there still a need for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172152776 ?
Cheers,
Andy
InsertUser (2024-05-31 12:06:42+00:00): @SomeoneElse 
I've merged the two Dogger Bank features now, keeping the oldest way ID (from this changeset) and the better geometry from the newer import.
SomeoneElse (2024-05-31 12:34:15+00:00): Thanks - I'd agree with the comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152077744 (that it's not really a reef) and will have a think about whether me showing subsea=bank as anything is worth doing.
tyr_asd (2016-08-20 20:30:49+00:00): Was für eine Schutzhütte ist denn https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1831343285? Am Luftbild sieht man keinen Anhaltspunkt für eine Hütte in der Gegend.
Zottel100 (2016-08-24 14:32:35+00:00): Es ist eine offene Jagthütte
tyr_asd (2016-08-24 15:48:03+00:00): Danke für deine schnelle Rückmeldung!
Ok, dann passt statt "alpine_hut" wohl besser ein "shelter" als Tag. Ist schon angepasst.
d1sr4n (2022-07-14 23:30:09+00:00): #12345678
czubi (2020-11-12 16:37:06+00:00): Was hattest du hier vor? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172280487
czubi (2020-11-12 16:39:12+00:00): Gibt ganz viele dieser leeren Ringe...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172280505
_torsten_ (2020-11-12 16:43:06+00:00): Das weiß ich heute nicht mehr. :(
Es sieht aus, als ob das innere Flächen von Polygonen waren ... 
Wenn da (nach 8 Jahren) nix zu sehen ist, einfach löschen. :)
czubi (2020-11-12 17:07:54+00:00): das sind so viele... und immer fehlt das inner.
_torsten_ (2020-11-13 06:17:43+00:00): Der erste hat kein (inner) -> hab ich entfernt.
Der zweite hat aber ein (inner), nur keine Eigenschaften. Ist das schlimm? Die Fläche wird doch ausgeschnitten.
czubi (2020-11-13 07:21:10+00:00): Den inner hatte ich schonmal entfernt um aufzuzeigen das er keinerlei Eigenschaften besitzt. Die anderen inner auch meist keine Eigenschaft. Mal angenommen man würde die Relation auflösen dann wären da nur noch Flächen ohne Eigenschaften. Das ist m.E. nicht im Sinne des Erfinders. Und warum sollte man was ausschneiden ohne anzugeben was es ist?
_torsten_ (2020-11-13 15:14:38+00:00): Ich habe ein paar fehlende Eigenschaften ergänzt und "inner", die keine sind, entfernt.
Nmxosm (2018-10-22 14:23:46+00:00): Hallo papillon81,

ich habe gesehen, dass Tim1977 in dem Änderungssatz https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63758864 einen Bücherschrank mit amenity=public_bookcase erstellt hat. Laut Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_bookcase) wäre das die passendere Beschreibung.

Bitte ziehe eine Änderung zu diesem Tag in Erwägung.

VlG Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2018-11-27 06:48:20+00:00): Ich habe den Bücherschrank jetzt mit amenity=public_bookcase getaggt: https://www.osm.org/changeset/64817860
sander79 (2017-12-30 12:57:00+00:00): Hoi,

een tip voor de volgende keer.

Als je highway=path gebruikt dan geef je indirect meteen access aan (brom)fietsers,paarden, etc

zie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Netherlands
SomeoneElse (2015-06-08 13:04:34+00:00): (assuming it's still there) are you going to undelete https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1833702708/history , or would you like me to?  They also replaced https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59267532/history with https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3558188850 which has fewer tags.
Yorvik Prestigitator (2015-06-09 05:23:08+00:00): After discussion with rsg123 about their deletion of clock and damage to Piccadilly in changeset 31477231 they told me the deletion and damage were by mistake (though slightly confused why they apologised from a different account - maybe they have 2 accounts).
I could not see any way of undoing their edit so reinstated the clock and repaired Piccadilly in changeset 31521214.
The Cut hairdresser node seems to be rsg123's creation so I assume they would be best to edit it, (though not sure why they would delete it and create new rather than simply edit it).
fkv (2020-05-25 07:37:20+00:00): Dort wo unten der Weg zur Hochgrua-Hütte anfängt, ist am Wegweiser eine Union-Hütte angeschrieben. Sind die identisch?
syntex (2020-09-21 17:56:23+00:00): Вы хорошо всё добавили, но я думаю что этот слой, который вы использовали был очень перемещавший
zarl (2016-08-24 06:32:13+00:00): Hallo Michael,

wie erklärt sich denn die Hausnummer "19 links" in deinem Node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1834480140/history und natürlich auch das Gegenstück "rechts". Steht das so auf dem Nummernschild?
Michael_H (2016-08-24 15:56:59+00:00): Richtig. Zumindest war das vor 4 Jahren so, als ich dort war.