piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mgranset (2021-05-05 06:02:21+00:00): Kilde = Folkemunne (En nyere henvisning til denne kollen, som ikke har noe historiske kartdata).
Patchanka (2020-07-15 12:48:54+00:00): bonjour
j'ai plusieurs remarques concernant ces modifications : 
- concernant l'école, seuls un nom (name=) a été indiqué. Or un name ne peut pas suffire pour qualifier l'objet qui est cartographié (par exemple pour une école, il faut mettre a minima amenity=school et le name= sert juste à indiquer le nom de l'école.) De plus l'école est déjà cartographiée au niveau du bâtiment.
- pareil pour la borne électrique. Il faut ajouter des tags qui indiquent de quoi il s'agit. De plus il y a déjà une borne de recharge de véhicules électriques cartographié juste au dessus. Ne serait-ce pas un doublon ?
- concernant l'objet "Crédit agricole", ne serait-ce pas plutôt amenity=atm (distributeur automatique) ? plutôt que vending_machine

Dans le doute, il vaut peut-être mieux créer une note dans OSMand plutôt que d'y créer des objets directement.

bonne journée
aceman444 (2020-08-17 05:57:24+00:00): Fakt prinosne.
iriman (2020-07-28 07:29:38+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز. بنا بر تقسیمات کشوری باند فرودگاه در شهرستان آباده قرار دارد. برای تأیید این موضوع به فایل تقسیمات کشوری ۱۳۹۷ نگاهی بیندازید:
https://www.amar.org.ir/Portals/0/Geo/GEO97.xlsx
در این فایل در ردیف 26229 باند فرودگاه در شهرستان آباده قرار دارد.
Mahdi Aghashiri (2020-07-28 19:43:46+00:00): باسلام خدمت شما دوست عزیز و گرامی .با تحقیقی که انجام دادم متوجه این موضوع شدم که این فرودگاه نه به نام اقلید هست و نه به نام آباده بلکه به نام رسمی فرودگاه شمال فارس نامگذاری شده است و از مسئولین که سوال شد این موضوع مطرح شد که اراضی فرودگاه نیمی از آن در منطقه طُغُر (Toghor)  شهرستان اقلید و نیمی دیگر در اراضی شهرستان آباده واقع شده در اصل این منطقه مرز دو شهرستان نیز می باشد بنابراین تصمیم بر این شده است که نام فرودگاه به هیچ یک از شهرستان ها اختصاص نیابد و برای افتتاح آن نیز مسئولین هر دو شهرستان حاضر شدند. این موضوع را بنده هم اکنون متوجه شدم و سلیقه شخصی نبوده از تغییرات قبلی معذرت میخواهم صرفا چون نماینده اقلید آن را افتتاح نموده و در اراضی اقلید بوده نامگذاری انجام شده که هر دو نامگذاری دارای اشکال می باشد. پس بهتر است نام فرودگاه شمال فارس را برای آن اعمال کنیم که مشکلی در آینده برای ویرایشگران دیگر نیز به وجود نیاید. با تشکر از حسن توجه شما ویرایشگر عزیز.
Mahdi Aghashiri (2020-07-28 19:49:02+00:00): https://www.instagram.com/p/BQJF-mplRya/
PT-53 (2020-07-10 05:22:34+00:00): Hallo ADAC Kartographie,
arbeitest Du für den ADAC? Dann beachte bitte die "Organised Editing Guidelines":
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an der ADAC-Geschäftsstelle das Merkmal
wheelchair=yes
gelöscht. Ist die Geschäftsstelle nicht Rollstuhlgerecht?
Und warum hast Du die Öffnungszeiten gelöscht?

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-07-10 13:57:33+00:00): Hallo ADAC Kartographie, 
Du hast zwischenzeitlich die (versehentlich ?) gelöschten Merkmale wieder eingetragen. Gut.
Eine Antwort wäre aber auch noch schön.
Wartende Grüße
ADAC Kartographie (2020-07-13 07:04:39+00:00): Servus,
danke für den Hinweis, habe die Daten aus Versehen gelöscht und jetzt nachträglich wieder eingetragen.
Viele Grüße
PT-53 (2020-07-13 09:15:39+00:00): Und, machst Du diese Einträge / Änderungen im Auftrag des ADAC?
Fragende Grüße
marc__marc (2021-02-22 14:43:39+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue.
si vous connaissez l'étendue du terrain de boule, n'hésitez pas à le représenter par une surface au lieu d'un point https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7698753105
Cordialement,
Marc
bxl-forever (2022-06-11 12:46:34+00:00): This changeset is 100% destructive (14 ways and 65 nodes) for no apparent reason: most of those small garden sheds still exist.
Your change has been reverted.
eggie (2020-07-09 09:54:00+00:00): Dag 3-14t1950  , Lijkt me correct om het te corrigeren.
Overigens rendert deze tagging niet als naam in OSM standaardkaart als het op de adresnode wordt getagd.
Ik 'verhelp' dat dan door leisure=sports_centre toe te voegen. 

MVG,
Eggie
Vinber-Pro (2020-07-10 10:14:04+00:00): Bonjour,
il semble que cela soit un ajout de doublons, un POI alors que le way est déja présent. Est-ce qu'il y a une raison particulière ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87754649
Vinber-Pro (2020-07-10 10:39:27+00:00): non désolé, en fait il y a la police et la police municipale, côte à ôte dans les mêmes locaux. Tout roule donc
smb1001 (2020-12-18 11:18:42+00:00): Hi. You deleted the St Matthew's Mission Church building as part of this change. Has it really been demolished, as their church website still talks about it?
Casey_boy (2020-12-18 12:12:19+00:00): Hi, I've just checked what happened (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87755135) and it shows the position of the church was clearly incorrect based on aerial imagery. But deleting it was an error - it should have been edited/moved to its correct location. I'll add it back, in its correct location, and post here with the changeset link. Apologies.
Casey_boy (2020-12-18 12:17:52+00:00): Restored (in correct location) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96069831
ToniE (2020-07-09 10:16:44+00:00): Hallo PHvL,

da der Bayernatlas als Quelle für OSM tabu ist werde ich diesen Changeset revertiere, d.h. rückgängig machen.

Bitte keine Daten aus dem Bayernatlas verwenden, ebensowenig wie von Google, ... und anderen Quellen, die bzgl. Copyright und Lizenz nicht kompatibel mit OSM sind.

Beste Quelle ist immer noch die Besichtigung vor Ort.

Viele Grüße
Toni
limmmoh (2020-07-09 09:37:11+00:00): Added a driveway according to Private Maxar Imagery
blackboxlogic (2020-07-11 00:16:41+00:00): Looks like you created a closed way and a node which don't have any tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87756784
velaia (2020-07-09 15:12:13+00:00): 👍 Fun mapping session together. Go OSM South Korea! 😃
Ian Wagner (2020-07-09 15:13:07+00:00): :)
limseong (2020-07-11 09:16:30+00:00): 👍
zstadler (2021-03-02 08:31:23+00:00): שלום דודי,

תודה על התרומה שלך ל OSM בעריכת ועדכון המפה!

בעריכה זו תייגת עם
tracktype=grade1
את הדרך
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309934217/history
משביל המסוע דרומה אל השביל השחור 

כנראה שאתה לא מודע לזה שעל פי כללי התיוג בארץ, 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Conventions_for_Hiking_and_Biking_Trails
המשמעות היא שזו דרך עפר באיכות גבוהה (ובוודאי שהיא עבירה לכל כלי רכב). כיוון שזה לא המצב, הסרתי את התגית.

אם אתה זוכר מקומות נוספים שבהם השתמשת בתיוג הזה בטעות, אשמח אם תתקן בעצמך או שאעזור לך לתקן.

תודה,
זאב
GinaroZ (2020-07-09 13:52:05+00:00): There was a discussion about this when the relations were initially added: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74330916 - don't think it should be tagged as an NCN
christiank61 (2020-07-09 16:33:06+00:00): There is a description on https://www.cyclinguk.org/route/great-north-trail-full-route-cape-wrath with GPX-Tracks. So its a well known route. IMO nowadays this is a good as signs along a route. 
However, if someone removes the NCN I will not insist an will find my own solution with OpenAndroMaps IF it is a LEGAL route and does not get in conflict with landowners.
Can anyone confirm this?
ACS1986 (2020-07-09 22:37:20+00:00): Not sure what you're asking re: legality. I assume that CUK's route will be perfectly legal to cycle, but it might create legal issues for OSM if the data source isn't compatible with our licence.
 I will repeat the following points which others raised in the previous changeset:
a) Explicit permission does need to be obtained before importing CUK's GPX data into OSM. They would also need to confirm that no other body (eg. Ordnance Survey) holds copyright in that data.
b) It goes against a long-standing convention to map what's on the ground.
c) If it is to be added, this route is not part of the National Cycle Network, so should not be tagged ncn.
On a final note, the real value of the OSM database is the data we collect ourselves. Taking a third party's publicly available gpx file and importing it doesn't really add much.
Kind regards,
Adam
Chris Fleming (2020-07-11 09:33:38+00:00): This isn't so much a NCN route as a bunch of rights of way combined together to form a bunch of linked rights of way.

So the NCN tagging elevates this to a level where non MTB users might end up attempting it.

So it's fine to show and and display as a route, and I have no doubts about the legality of cycling it,  however  it should be shown with the emphasis on the MTB rather than NCN!

I hope that makes sense?
christiank61 (2020-07-12 05:02:18+00:00): Thats OK for me
ACS1986 (2020-07-12 10:49:38+00:00): As there's a difference of opinions I've started a discussion on the uk mailing list in the hope of achieving some local community consensus.
The messages on the list can be viewed (after a short delay) here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2020-July/date.html
To receive messages and contribute to the list you can signup here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Saritha K S (2020-07-10 11:09:08+00:00): Please map school buildings separatly
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87758621
BCNorwich (2020-07-10 06:11:00+00:00): Hi,
You are duplicating a lot of nodes, please see here :-http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-1.94228&lat=53.74626&zoom=14&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Could you please remedy these anomalies? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-07-10 13:48:10+00:00): Hi, You have the building drawn over a wall.
Eddie Energie (2020-07-11 07:48:09+00:00): Thank you for all your comments, BC Norwich. This a minor error, which if you feel so inclined you could correct.
I am new to this, as a group of orienteers we are upgrading the map in this area as there are so many features missing.
I daresay there maybe a lot of minor errors like this and the others you have pointed out.
Eddie Energie (2020-07-11 07:48:51+00:00): Please correct them.if you feel so inclined.
BCNorwich (2020-07-11 08:38:08+00:00): OK, thanks for your response. I've made the corrections but it really is simplicity to map correctly in the first place. 
Regards Bernard.
Eddie Energie (2020-07-11 13:45:50+00:00): Cheers Bernard.
I'm used to using OCAD which makes things much easier. The problem is my computer is often used in part of my home with no internet. So Mapping is takes places as and when. You'll have seen I have made lots of edits, as masses of features are missing. I'm still getting to grips with the editind software, as it's not quite as easy as OCAD. 
cheers
Rainero (2020-07-09 20:23:17+00:00): Hallo Hardl_MC,
was ist denn daran falsch? Zuvor war es durchaus richtig mit leisure=swimming_pool kartiert. Wenn es darum geht, daß das Schwimmbecken momentan gesperrt ist, läßt sich das entweder mit den Covid-Tags oder mit access abbilden.
Servus,
Rainer
MacLondon (2020-10-26 16:56:13+00:00): Hi, there's something wrong with this conditional turn restriction. From Peter St to City Sq would be a LEFT turn, but the restriction type is set as an 'only_right_turn'.
Saritha K S (2020-07-10 10:09:28+00:00): Please avoid bulk uploading.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87761393
Saritha K S (2020-07-10 11:12:05+00:00): Please follow our instructions. Too many errors
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87761393
tordans (2020-07-09 11:07:47+00:00): <3
aharvey (2020-07-10 05:07:38+00:00): ps https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date is only for future dates, now that it's open it should be https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date per the wiki.
Arconez (2020-07-09 11:20:27+00:00): I uploaded these nodes to the wrong server, not my local server but the OSM server. I don't know how to delete them...
Arconez (2020-07-09 11:20:20+00:00): I uploaded these nodes to the wrong server, not my local server but the OSM server. I don't know how to delete them...
Arconez (2020-07-09 11:20:12+00:00): I uploaded these nodes to the wrong server, not my local server but the OSM server. I don't know how to delete them...
Arconez (2020-07-09 11:20:06+00:00): I uploaded these nodes to the wrong server, not my local server but the OSM server. I don't know how to delete them...
Arconez (2020-07-09 11:19:58+00:00): I uploaded these nodes to the wrong server, not my local server but the OSM server. I don't know how to delete them...
Arconez (2020-07-09 11:19:52+00:00): I uploaded these nodes to the wrong server, not my local server but the OSM server. I don't know how to delete them...
Arconez (2020-07-09 11:19:40+00:00): I uploaded these nodes to the wrong server, not my local server but the OSM server. I don't know how to delete them...
BCNorwich (2020-07-10 06:34:11+00:00): Hi,
Your wood areas overlap each other. They could well join each other but I doubt they overlap. There are also highways joined to the wood edge, are the paths in or out of the woods?
Regards Bernard.
pza (2020-07-09 13:16:34+00:00): Hi Peter, It looks like you accidentally moved part of Victoria St up to Rushcutters Bay Park.  It's an easy mistake to make when scrolling in the ID editor, as left click is used for both moving nodes and scrolling.  I've put that back in the right spot in changeset 87767663.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87762008
Peter Bourke (2020-07-10 00:09:20+00:00): Thanks PZA, yep that was obviously a stuff up, shouldnt be in a hurry doing this. Cheers Peter
adamh (2020-12-02 04:18:15+00:00): Looks like you accidentally moved part of Anderson St in Melbourne. Way #12985474.
Can you please check.
Peter Bourke (2020-12-03 22:03:19+00:00): thanks for the feedback - i've tried to straighten the st but cant without 'stuffing' up the tan track. Would appreciate any advice on fixing it. thanks Peter
nevw (2020-12-03 23:35:51+00:00): Hi
I have disconnected the Anderson Street node from the Tan Track and re-aligned to imagery.
Peter Bourke (2020-12-03 23:44:26+00:00): Sensational thanks
SHARCRASH (2020-07-09 11:32:53+00:00): + new elements
eggie (2020-07-09 11:46:39+00:00): Ha Jeroen,

Haal je de website ook nog even weg?
Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87762777

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-09 12:16:21+00:00): Dag Peter.. Is de straatnaam werkelijk name=Graspad... zoniet beter die naamregel verwijderen.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87763061
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-09 12:18:16+00:00): Peter.. eigenlijk hezelfde.. name=Trapveld hoort niet op de kaart.
Wel keun je evt. leisure=pitch met sport=soccer  gebruiken als het om een voetbalveldje gaat.
Kijk je nog even.
MVG,
Eggie
BCNorwich (2020-07-10 06:20:08+00:00): Hi, 
You've joined the track to a wall, showing the wall extending to the center line of the track. Is it really joined, if so how do vehicles overcome the wall end? 

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-07-10 06:13:51+00:00): Hi,
You've mapped the track as passing through the wall, this surely can't be correct. Is there a gap in the wall, if so could you please correct it?

Regards Bernard.
Kalaraj (2020-07-10 18:53:23+00:00): Good work try to use the squarize building it would be more better to see the maapped building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87764218
Kalaraj (2020-07-10 18:53:24+00:00): Good work try to use the squarize building it would be more better to see the maapped building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87764218
eggie (2020-07-09 12:23:21+00:00): Dag Marcel.. kennelijk kun je hier niet verder met bv een auto, maar wellicht wel als tweewieler of als wandelaar?
Staat er misschien gewoon een paaltje? of is het een stukje highway=footway of path?

MVG,
Eggie
marcelsmidt (2020-07-09 15:20:20+00:00): Bedankt voor de opmerking, melding was van een collega, gaf aan dat er een roadblock geplaatst was. zojuist ter plaatse gegaan het betreft idd een doorgang voor de fiets en te voet. Pas hem direct aan!
Kovoschiz (2020-07-09 20:09:36+00:00): 1. Please be aware of the scheme in overriding general `access:*=` with specific keys. 
2. "public" local streets won't be considered `highway=service`
Brian Hui (2020-07-10 02:54:09+00:00): These roads, together with all of my other edits you've reverted, are valid becoz they are roads that all vehicles, including motor vehicles, can drive along. The original tags are wrong and I made the right ones. What should I tag for such case? (using browser --> Edit with iD)
Kovoschiz (2020-07-10 09:26:18+00:00): The keys you are looking at refer to legal restriction, not physical accessibility. The `highway=*` value already indicates what vehicles can it drive on.
Kovoschiz (2020-07-10 09:28:38+00:00): For example: A generic `highway=path` may physically be able to allow at most single-tracked only; A `highway=pedestrian` physically allows two-tracked ie four-wheeled or above vehicles to drive on it. But these doesn't say all such vehicles are allowed legally.
mavl (2020-07-13 13:53:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
eggie (2020-07-09 12:27:38+00:00): Eigenlijk hetzelfde..Mag je verder als voetganger of fietser?
marcelsmidt (2020-07-09 15:28:19+00:00): zojuist ter plaatse gegaan en kaart opnieuw aangepast.

Bedankt voor het meekijken/meedenken
tordans (2020-07-11 04:33:06+00:00): Hi Martin, es müsste aber doch zusätzlich „cycleway:left=no“ heißen, richtig? Denn der Hochboard-Radweg ist gesperrt und wir können damit angeben, dass es keinen gibt (was an der Stelle echt ätzend ist…). VG!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87765133
ein Schaf (2020-07-13 00:47:13+00:00): Ja, richtig - deshalb habe ich ja auf dem Teil der Straße, wo zwar ein Radweg existiert, dieser aber aufgrund von miserablem Zustand gesperrt ist, disused:cycleway:left=track getaggt.
Nakaner (2020-07-10 07:03:35+00:00): Hallo,

bicycle=yes ist hier unnötig, da der Feldweg keine höherwertigen einschränkenden Zugangsbeschränkungs-Tags wie vehicle=no/private oder access=no/private hat und highway=track bicycle=yes impliziert. Siehe dazu auch wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87765356
zstadler (2021-06-26 11:51:32+00:00): שלום דודי,

תודה על העדכונים והעריכות במפת OSM!

יש כנראה שגיאת הקלדה במונח "בעיה בבלית" בתאור השביל 

בנוסף, אם השביל עביר לגיפים ממוגנים, אז עדיף להגדיר אותו כ
highway=track
עם ה
tracktype
המתאים לפי הוויקי

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Israel#Conventions_for_Hiking_and_Biking_Trails

תודה,
זאב
eggie (2020-07-09 12:32:11+00:00): Top!

Trouwens nog een tip... Editor iD heeft de mogelijkheid de achtergrond in te stellen als PDOK actueel. Bing is totaal verouderd en ligt er volledig naast.
Veranderen kan in de editmodus ergens rechts in het scherm.
Eggie
Cascafico (2020-07-09 14:13:26+00:00): Prima di proseguire con altre cancellazioni di fermate, ricordati che se ce ne sono due su lati opposti della strada, è un errore cancellarne una.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87765571
user_11452467 (2020-07-09 16:32:40+00:00): Ora sono in mezzo alla strada
Cascafico (2020-07-09 14:11:46+00:00): La fermata esiste, non era un duplicato.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87765626
user_11452467 (2020-07-09 16:32:14+00:00): È più su. Ce già l'altra
Kovoschiz (2020-07-09 20:10:38+00:00): Please comment if you have any issues with reverts
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87765627
Cascafico (2020-07-09 14:09:24+00:00): il parcheggio esiste
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87765758
user_11452467 (2020-07-09 16:31:32+00:00): Assolutamente no. Ora in quel parcheggio c'è una piscina interrata!
SomeoneElse (2020-10-18 12:10:06+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/824557101/history
was offset relative to the imagery - I've nudged it back.
Best Regards,
Andy
jgopatho (2020-10-20 03:10:27+00:00): Hi Andy,
Thanks for your feedback. Apologies for the miss from my end. I have added the segment based on Maxar imageries which is offset. I'll keep a tab on this issue in my future edits.
Regards
mavl (2020-07-13 13:54:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
tordans (2020-07-11 04:30:08+00:00): Und wieder ein TODO von meiner Liste gestrichen ;-). Top!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87766168
maposm (2020-07-11 15:40:55+00:00): Hallo FS Lüneburg und willkommen bei OpenStreetmap!

Du hast hier einen Knoten [1] erstellt, der den "Fairteiler" darstellen soll. Diesem Knoten hast du die Eigenschaft "shop=supermarket" zugewiesen. Das passt hier nicht, denn der "Fairteiler" bietet ja wohl kein breites Lebensmittelsortiment zum Verkauf an.
Ändere das am besten in die Kategorie "amenity=give_box" [2] um. Ich denke mal das passt hier ganz gut (auch wenn die Einrichtung hier "Fairteiler" heißt und nicht "Give-Box")

Außerdem hast du dann noch einen Fußweg [3] als "Foodsharing" benannt. Ich gehe stark davon aus, dass dieser Weg nicht so heißt und dann solltest du den Namen auch wieder vom Weg entfernen.

Viele Grüße
maposm


[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7699511429
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dgive_box
[3] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316233636
Tomas Straupis (2020-07-10 05:25:30+00:00): Nereikia klausyti iD pasiūlymų keisti „pasenusias“ žymas. landuse=basin yra visiškai teisingas žymėjimas. Atstačiau.
wardmuylaert (2020-07-09 14:05:22+00:00): For cyclists too?
toco (2020-07-09 14:14:51+00:00): no, cyclists are still allowed both ways. sorry for the confusion.
Pitoresker Pi (2020-07-21 13:05:27+00:00): In diesem Changeset hast du glaube ich versehentlich eine Kreuzwegstation [1] verschoben, oder soll das so?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1459669537
skorpion62 (2020-07-09 20:40:02+00:00): Hallo Ropino,
Wollte gerade schauen ob ich alles richtig eingetragen habe. Danke für die Korrektur, war ein versehen von mir.
Viele Grüße skorpion62
Ropino (2020-07-10 05:13:38+00:00): Hallo skorpion62,
insbesondere wenn es offensichtlich ist, bin ich so frei es einfach zu korrigieren.
Mir passieren auch Fehler und diese dürfen gern korrigiert werden.
Viele Grüße
Robert
AgusQui (2020-07-11 04:54:16+00:00): Si no indica la fuente de sus cambios, los mismos serán revertidos, también le avisé que está usando mal el valor operator, building y opening_hours:covid19
ma-rt-in (2020-07-10 06:13:57+00:00): Hallo,
woher stammt den die Info das es hier kein Kleingartverein mehr gibt sonder Neubauten entstehen sollen?
vg
ghsommer (2020-07-10 06:44:48+00:00): Moin Ma-rt-in
Quelle: https://www.hamburg.de/mitte/bplaene-im-verfahren/12751286/wilhelmsburg-96-oea/
Falls nach der Plandiskussion noch Änderungen am Bebauungsplan vorgesehen worden wären, fände ich das überraschend, zumal dort m.W. schon die Bagger angerollt waren und die Fläche gerodet wurde. Aber wenn der KGV dort bliebe fände ich das sehr erfreulich. Weißt Du mehr?
ma-rt-in (2020-07-10 06:46:21+00:00): Danke für die Infos. Du warst ja mit SC vor Ort, wie sieht es den da zur Zeit aus. Haben die Bagger da alles platt gemacht oder steht der Kgv noch?
pza (2020-07-09 23:33:19+00:00): The comment is incorrect. The partial revert is for changeset 87762008.
Kovoschiz (2020-07-09 20:11:24+00:00): Again these are wrong scheme of tagging
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87767768
Bernhard W (2020-08-08 12:34:43+00:00): Hello 
on 2020-07-09 you have changed one of Mannheims main streets at the bridge "Neckarauaer Übergang" from "primary" to "residential". Why?
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87767820#map=18/49.47159/8.48444