piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kai Johnson (2023-01-02 00:00:24+00:00): The original address data from SanGIS was correct. I have reverted the address information.
ALLstarGUY (2023-01-04 16:43:52+00:00): This road serves the retreat/resort located at Indian Head.
Kai Johnson (2023-01-04 16:59:32+00:00): That may be so, but the street signs say "Hoberg Road," the SanGIS record says "Hoberg Road" and the address data for the parcels along this road are for "Hoberg Road." So, this is "Hoberg Road." You can't just arbitrarily give a road a new name.
sikaheimo (2020-04-16 19:18:13+00:00): *foot path, eh.
geo_roads (2020-04-21 00:33:37+00:00): Hi Ross. Can you use changeset comments that describe what changes you are making to the map? What is cambios central team? 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
user_5359 (2020-04-18 06:35:42+00:00): Hello, please have a look on node http://www.osm.org/node/7412194955 . What ist the meaning of  the tag fic=co ?
gebux (2020-04-18 10:26:02+00:00): Should have been fixme=continue, it's has been fixed by mueschel already
gebux (2020-04-16 19:39:21+00:00): Dieser Steig ist ein vielbegangener und deutlicher Abstiegsweg vom Burgstall.
howtodowtle (2020-04-17 09:10:14+00:00): Habe von oben kommend den Durchgang nicht gefunden. Hier muss ich nochmal genauer schaun, kann gut sein, dass ich etwas übersehen habe.
gebux (2020-04-17 14:06:02+00:00): Der Steig führt erst bergab auf eine Felsnase, dann mit einer Kehre auf ein etwas verstecktes Felsband. Von unten definitiv leichter zu finden.
howtodowtle (2020-04-17 18:00:22+00:00): Danke, ich probier es mal von unten beim nächsten Mal. :)
gebux (2020-04-16 19:40:22+00:00): Auch dieser Steig existiert noch, nicht allzu deutlich aber durchaus auffindbar.
howtodowtle (2020-04-17 09:11:06+00:00): War am 13.4.2020 dort und von Süden kommend war am Zaun (der hier auf OSM sichtbar ist) Schluss, aktuell ist dort definitiv kein Durchgang. Eventuell existiert der Steig von beiden Seiten, aber man kommt an dieser Stelle von Süden nach Norden nicht durch.
gebux (2020-04-17 13:43:48+00:00): Einen Zaundurchlass gabs auch bei meinen letzten Besuch keinen, Photos vom Steig danach habe ich mit Ausnahme vom Steigbaum leider keine gemacht: https://imgur.com/2HxuOBl
howtodowtle (2020-04-17 18:01:51+00:00): Hmm, vielen Dank. Habe wirklich gar nichts gesehen. Also über den Zaun und einfach gerade aus weiter, dann kommt man irgendwann zum Steigbaum?
gebux (2020-04-17 20:36:35+00:00): Ja, über den Zaun und etwas ansteigend wenn ich mich richtig erinnere. Bei meinen Besuch gabs ausreichend Steinmänner um sich zu orientieren.
pio2_122 (2020-04-20 08:30:15+00:00): Dzięki, że poprawiasz "mrówki", jednak poprawna nazwa ulicy wg TERYT to  Marszałka Józefa Piłsudskiego, a nie Józefa Piłsudskiego.
W tych adresach było to poprawnie.
grelus (2020-04-20 08:43:54+00:00): Czytałem, że oficjalna nazwa tej ulicy w Koszalinie to Józefa Piłsudskiego bez "marszałka" co ma źródło w starych systemach informatycznych kiedy nie dąło się wpisać dłuższej nazwy. Nie wnikam czy to prawda. Jeżeli nie, to powinno się zmienić wszystkie stare adresy oraz nazwę samej ulicy, a nie tworzyć drugą wersje co  powoduje bałagan.
pio2_122 (2020-04-20 09:09:20+00:00): "Organem odpowiedzialnym za poprawność danych jest organ prowadzący, czyli wójt, burmistrz lub prezydent miasta (ustawa prawo geodezyjne i kartograficzne art. 47a pkt 1 i 5, Dz. U. 2017 poz. 2101)."
Obecnie więc "Marszałka Józefa Piłsudskiego" jest nazwą oficjalną, ponieważ te adresy pochodzą bezpośrednio z PRG, a dodaje je tam UM Koszalin.
Dodatkowo taka nazwa (tylko zapisana skrótami jest na tabliczkach w terenie: https://goo.gl/maps/QhvoXqUG2jfmkVBv7)
Często adresy, które są oznaczone jako "mrówki" są poprawne, a inne adresy w OSM już nie. Często dopiero po nich można zauważyć, że np. ulica ma już inną nazwę.

Niedługo postaram się poprawić adresy i nazwę ulicy.
pio2_122 (2020-04-20 09:24:42+00:00): PS. Podobna sytuacja jest z ulicą Władysława Andersa. Tylko w tym przypadku w OSM nadmiernie dopisany jest tytuł (Generała ...). Na tabliczkach jest tylko "ul. Andersa" https://goo.gl/maps/uNjRbf4AUL64DpGn8

Tutaj też to poprawię.
MKnight (2020-04-17 08:31:23+00:00): Moin,
ich habe dieses CS rückgängig gemacht, da die von Dir eingetragenen POIs bereits vorhanden sind.
jmapb (2020-04-17 21:10:42+00:00): Hi dinosaurjr, welcome to OSM! 

I'm an active mapper in Brooklyn and I was the one who named this playground "Playground Three III". Admittedly this is a strange name but it is what was written on the official Parks Dept sign last I looked, and the general rule in OSM is to use officially signed names for points of interest on the map.

I added the more commonly used name "Third Street Playground" as an alternate name using the alt_name tag, so people searching for "Third Street Playground" should still be able to find it.

Has the sign on the playground changed?
osm915 (2020-04-16 20:11:26+00:00): Sorry, falscher Änderungssatz-Kommentar. Korrekt:
Obernburg, Wehrinsel: track-Details ergänzt und teilweise in path geändert (foot,bicycle,horse yes entfernt, da nicht explizit ausgeschildert); Hausnummern+sidewalk in Umgebung ergänzt
user_5359 (2020-04-18 07:00:55+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7412419168. What ist the meaning of the key  Num2?
Mohamed_Gamal (2020-05-07 13:50:11+00:00): Sorry it was wrong key and i remove it.
Robbert van Dijk (2020-04-16 20:28:17+00:00): Franse Kamp moet zijn Buunderkamp.
Robbert van Dijk (2020-04-16 20:28:05+00:00): Franse Kamp moet zijn Buunderkamp.
21Bede (2024-02-19 21:53:09+00:00): The current (Jan 24) Bing image for w165085877 seems to show a different footprint for the building. Has anything changed since April 2020?
Thomas8122 (2020-04-20 14:43:25+00:00): Hat das einen tieferen Sinn mit dem building-tag am gesamten Gelände?
kartonage (2020-04-21 07:32:21+00:00): Entsprechend der Diskussion und Entstehungsgeschichte des ursprünglichen Nodes, würde ich auch keine Fläche empfehlen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/487436

Das building-Tag ist natürlich so oder so nicht passend.

Schöne Grüße
BCNorwich (2020-04-17 07:06:59+00:00): Hi, There's no need to delete any names, that is just removing genuinely correct data from OSM. When you wish to amend a name to Welsh please change the English name tag from name=??? to  name:en=Cowbridge Road. 
Thus adding instead of distracting from our database. This is after all a worldwide database so everyone should be equally catered for.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-04-17 07:11:30+00:00): Please don't join areas to power lines.
kaltuna (2020-06-18 04:55:30+00:00): Hallo ! Du hast mit diesem Changieret einige Highway-Tags auf service geändert. Vor allem die Straße Im Wingertsgrund im südlichen Abschnitt ist definitiv weiterhin residential !

Zudem gibt es seit gestern auch unabhängig davon diesen Hinweismarker:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2232425

Ich wäre dafür, zumindest die angesprochenen ways wieder als highway=residential sowie mit ihrem Straßennamen zu versehen. Was meinst Du dazu ?
TuukkaH (2022-02-14 20:52:26+00:00): Not all of these should be brand=Alko even though they are shop=alcohol
houtari (2022-02-15 05:12:28+00:00): Thanks for the tip. My bad. I've now removed the "brand=Alko" from where it doesn't belong.
TuukkaH (2022-02-15 08:19:17+00:00): Thank you for fixing quickly! It makes a nice trivia question: "How many non-Alko alcohol shops are there in Finland?" :-)
HSL_HRT (2022-02-15 10:50:49+00:00): Exactly my thought too :-) Better use ["shop"="alcohol"]["brand"!="Alko"] to the Overpass query as some of these non-Alko might also have a brand tag.
CoyKoi (2020-04-22 04:24:50+00:00): Hi PabloNZ, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your edit. I see you have requested a review of your changeset: You have added the building correctly and tagged it with its address well. 

The one small problem is that you have tagged two features with the address: You have tagged the building polygon itself, and also the node on one of the corners. Both of these are correct methods to tag the address - but it should be one or the other, not both. So you should remove the address tags from one of the features (I would suggest removing from node 7412596458)

if you want to see why this can be a problem, look at how your house is rendering on the main map at openstreetmap.org at the highest zoom level - the address is rendering twice.

You can read more about the concept of 'one feature, one OSM object' on the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83669613
abakus_uploader (2020-04-17 22:30:53+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
fmarier (2020-04-17 02:17:57+00:00): Hi Allison,

You may have missed it due to the zoom level or something like that, but Chopped Leaf was in fact already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3843237663.

I removed the duplicate in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83673432.

Francois
emvee (2020-06-14 18:59:58+00:00): Hoi,

In deze changeset heb je o.a. oneway=yes voor fietspaden omgezet naar oneway:bicycle=yes. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137163266/history

Hoewel dat misschien formeel niet onjuist is, is dat niet wat de standaard is, die is gewoon "oneway=yes" voor fietspaden.

Je kan het probleem "zien" doordat bijv. o.a. ook scooters (mofa) het fietspad mogen gebruiken dus dan zou je ook oneway:mofa en alle andere categorieën moeten toevoegen.

Voor de Akkerdreef heb ik het terug gezet, zou jij het voor de rest willen nakijken?

Bedankt,

Martin.
BCNorwich (2020-05-18 09:23:14+00:00): Hi, I see the way Rhodfa Morgannwg (792725403, v1) has been changed to a track and the bus guideway tag removed, it's also now in two sections. As this way goes across fields and is on top of some other highways I wonder if it really exists. Could you shed some light on the situation please?

I would like to remedy the duplicated highways and seek confirmation of the cross-field sections

Regards Bernard
bryceco (2020-04-17 22:30:10+00:00): On what basis are you making these changes? You’re changing data that I surveyed on the ground just a week ago.
boopington (2020-04-18 23:24:29+00:00): Imgery obviously, and how the hell was i supposed to know someone had surveyed this?
boopington (2020-04-18 23:26:14+00:00): Besides, why tf is half of a road one way and the other not? How can you even drive on that?
bryceco (2020-04-18 23:52:58+00:00): Since the area is obviously under construction, and I added the road a week ago without the help of imagery, assuming it was done by survey would make sense. 

I can't explain why the segment is one-way, but the road narrows to a single lane with curbs so that's the way its going to be.
boopington (2020-04-19 00:50:15+00:00): if i had to investigate the history of every way i touched when editing i would never get anything done and my pc would fry with all those tabs, besides when i delete something i only remove when i see no trace left on any imagery.
bryceco (2020-04-19 01:05:01+00:00): I'm curious how you found that way. Are you looking at a feed that reported a problem with it?
boopington (2020-04-19 01:13:11+00:00): which way would you be talking about? and no
bryceco (2020-04-19 03:16:21+00:00): This one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/635849959
boopington (2020-04-19 06:01:39+00:00): Simple, since it was near a construction area i thought that it was some map newb who did it.
zzptichka (2020-04-16 23:59:15+00:00): It was not mass-deletion.

I had to delete/merge some of your sidewalks because we were working on the same area at the same time and after uploading I had to resolve multiple conflicts. I cleaned up and fixed everything and then you came in and reverted it all back.

Your revert did more damage than repair as it deleted multiple sidewalks on other streets that weren't replacing your sidewalks in the process.
DannyMcD (2020-04-17 00:24:47+00:00): I disagree with your characterization of events.  You could have chosen not to import your sidewalks after seeing mine, but you instead chose to mass-delete mine.

I apologize for deleting sidewalks that did not replace ones I originally drew - the reverter tool doesn't allow you to only delete replaced objects.  I have re-added most of the sidewalks on other streets that were deleted - I plan to go back over this area to make sure I haven't missed any.
zzptichka (2020-04-17 02:18:29+00:00): Uhh no. I loaded the square from task manager, merged my data, connected sidewalks to roads and as I was uploading the data I got conflicts. After synchronizing the dataset I saw your sidewalks and had to merge/delete them to proceed (since most of my sidewalks were already uploaded). You can check my history.
I wasn't even aware you were working on sidewalks in Gatineau before seeing those conflicts.

Anyway, you can use task manager to avoid this in the future: http://tasks.osmcanada.ca/project/177
DannyMcD (2020-04-17 03:00:06+00:00): In that case, you could have reverted your own upload instead of mass-deleting my sidewalks.
zzptichka (2020-04-17 04:28:29+00:00): Why should I? Nothing wrong with replacing existing geometry with new one, especially when existing geometry is of lower quality.

Anyway, I don't have time for that. Do as you like.
DannyMcD (2020-04-17 04:43:09+00:00): I disagree with your implication that my sidewalk geometry is low quality, or that the imported sidewalks are higher quality.
ma-rt-in (2020-04-17 13:25:25+00:00): Hallo,
ja sowei stimmt das mit der Brücke, aber die Ebenheit ist doch nicht schlecht, bei einer Metalbrücke?
vg
tagginator (2020-04-17 15:00:11+00:00): mit der Ebenheit war ich mir unsicher, wie man die einordnen soll, es ist so eine Art Metallrost, so ähnlich wie bei einer Kellerlichtschachtabdeckung
ma-rt-in (2020-04-17 18:14:03+00:00): Wenn es eine Glatteoberfläche ist, dann ist dies entweder good oder besser. Schau auch mal ins Wiki dafür.
wislander (2020-06-22 04:44:35+00:00): Hi coolwhiff,

Could you go into more detail about your reasoning for this change? To my knowledge, these roads are used only for forestry and recreation, which would make them a clear-cut (no pun intended) example of tracks. Service roads are typically short and found near buildings, such as driveways, drive-thrus, parking aisles, or alleys.

Thanks,
wislander
coolwhiff (2020-06-22 06:30:40+00:00): Hmm. Is there definitions somewhere? These are maintained forest service roads. And since they have "service road" in the name (& they're maintained) it seemed more appropriate.
coolwhiff (2020-06-22 07:13:14+00:00): But I'm new around here. It seems like a misnomer to call these roads "unmaintained tracks" - though there are certainly other tracks in the area. Let me know if I'm misunderstanding the term.
wislander (2020-06-23 04:53:54+00:00): Yeah, there's many of us who feel that "unmaintained track" is not the best description of that feature, but that description was chosen to try to fix some other misunderstandings about when to use tracks. Despite what that says, tracks can be maintained well, poorly, or not at all—roads in OSM are defined by their purpose, not their physical condition. 

In the editor, when you go to edit a road's type, there's a little "i" on the right side of each feature type. It'll give you a description that's a little longer, and you can see that a track is described as for agricultural or forestry, and service ways are described as providing access to a building. You'll also find a link to the relevant page on the OSM wiki there, which goes into more detail. wiki.openstreetmap.org is usually the best place to go to find definitions of different feature types, and there's also help.openstreetmap.org for when the wiki doesn't answer your question.

I hope that was helpful, and welcome to OSM!
user_8466505 (2020-10-09 22:17:32+00:00): Hi there! For buildings that are demolished, it is recommended that instead of noting that info in the name, you add the tag as demolished:building=yes to the demolished building. More info here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Ademolished%3Abuilding

Thanks,
TheAdventurer64
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-17 10:45:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83701239 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3634
Kotov Sergey (2020-04-17 01:45:19+00:00): Бетонный выступ - Опасность при сближении
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2020-06-12 19:36:12+00:00): Moin. Du hast hier bicycle=no an große Teile der B36 gehängt, mir sind da in letzter Zeit aber keine neuen Verbotsschilder aufgefallen. Ist mir da was entgangen?
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2020-06-12 19:39:13+00:00): Dito B3
Nakaner (2020-06-13 11:23:01+00:00): Hallo W0lle,

wenn du damit ausdrücken möchtest, dass es einen benutzungspflichtigen Parallelweg für Radfahrer gibt, wäre bicycle=use_sidepath korrekt.

Viele Grüße

Michael
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2020-06-13 15:21:38+00:00): Ich glaube, er meinte "Radler hier nicht!", denn nicht alle der so getaggten Straßen haben einen Radweg ... Jedenfalls stehen nirgends Radelverbote oder Kfzstraßenschilder, komme gerade von einer Besichtigungsrunde KA-(B36)-RA-(B3-KA zurück ... *schwitz* Hatte für heute eh noch kein sinnvolles Ziel ... ;-) Die gesetzten no's sind jedenfalls wohl alle falsch ...
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2020-06-13 20:05:18+00:00): So, hab's mal repariert ..
Marcos Medeiros (2021-05-11 22:01:42+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão criada por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11005360

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essa restrição?
muralito (2020-04-21 21:13:31+00:00): Es sport=padel
mariotomo (2022-08-22 15:00:44+00:00): mira que Río Sereno es capital del distrito Renacimiento, o por lo menos eso dice la base de datos OSM.
mejoras tú mismo la discrepancia?
mariotomo (2022-09-16 17:22:03+00:00): lo hice yo, pero por favor cuidado, gracias.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126272515
Alvarado2510 (2023-04-23 22:35:07+00:00): Bueno modificates la propuesta establecisa por ti, hace mas de 3 años, haber si entinedo, en un town solo por ser cabecera del distrito, teniendo menos de 4000 habitantes.
muralito (2020-04-21 21:11:07+00:00): Los elementos no llevan nombre descriptivo, solo si lo tienen realmente.
ganesh0709 (2020-04-17 03:50:02+00:00): The entire route was done using MTC's bus stop roster list.
literan (2020-04-19 12:24:49+00:00): Вы упорно присваиваете пешеходной дорожек в Красногорске название "Улица Козловка". https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/378325717/history

Я уже писал в личке, повторю здесь аргументацию: это пешеходная дорожка шириной полтора метра через лес (полтора года назад лесной массив был преобразован в "экопарк"), существует в городе как минимум с начала 80-х (я живу в городе с 1978 года). Никакой улицы там не было и нет. Козловка - общеупотребимое название данной дорожки (Common Name), его знает практически любой житель города. Также это название фигурирует на схеме парка, выставленной на щите. Приведите, пожалуйста, свои аргументы, почему эта (конкретно эта) дорожка должна носить имя "Улица Козловка".
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 18:04:13+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?  Надеюсь в преть Ваши правки будут менее глобальными. Согласовывайте импорт  и перетегирование с местным сообществом. В противном случае будет откачено
Спасибо за понимание.
Md Bappy (2020-04-17 05:38:20+00:00): Golden Eagle Open Air Scout Group
@Garam (2024-01-16 16:34:13+00:00): 바뀜 #83682198의 길 792788515를 보면 방배선행길과 이어져 있는데 이어진 위치에 실제로는 바위가 있습니다.
GOwin (2020-04-18 06:50:54+00:00): Thank you for continuing to contribute to the OSMph's community mapping project, #OSMaPaaralan 

I hope all is well with you!
user_10433168 (2020-04-17 06:50:52+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian

A highway=pedestrian is a road or an area mainly or exclusively for pedestrians in which some vehicle traffic may be authorized (e.g. emergency, taxi, delivery, ...)

Squares and plazas
For many years, a closed way tagged with highway=pedestrian and area=yes was the only way to map squares and plazas.....

Den leei pouthena "min to kanete an krivei kati", afti i perioxi pou esbises EINAI "pedestrian area", einai plakostroti k epitreponte MONO oi pezoi, (asxeto oti ellada eimaste k den iparxei astinomia na aferesei diplomata apo tous paravates me dikikla/mixanakia klp). Einai o orismos tou pedestrian area. To oti bazei mia gkriza perioxi einai sosto giati etsi einai to pedestrian area kai den exei KAMIA simasia an krivei kati apo ton xarti!!  Oi ipiresies pou xrisimopoioun to osm den tha mperdeftoun apo afto, oi algorithmoi tous den noiazonte, den exoun 'matia' skanaroun tin perioxi k 'blepoun' ola ta tags asxetos.
yadathot (2020-04-17 06:23:25+00:00): Modified the geometry of the roads as per latest imagery's and Added Residential Roads, Barriers as per Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.
Canal des Pangalanes (2021-04-29 06:29:09+00:00): Hi Mayuz Duarte,
why have you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669787189/history ?
philippec (2020-11-30 12:30:42+00:00): Het GRB is hier verkeerd.  Ik zal het gebouw aanpassen, zodat de plaats van de AED duidelijker wordt.  Ik wacht nu op mapillary.
user_5359 (2020-04-17 09:43:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
philippec (2020-11-24 10:17:16+00:00): Goed geplaatst.  Het is zichtbaar op de foto van de koncurrentie.
mavl (2020-04-17 07:10:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 83633425, 83640715, 83642904, 83652382.
literan (2020-04-17 16:22:37+00:00): прекратите безобразничать
Mbabani Allan (2020-04-21 07:42:57+00:00): Please take note of tagging the right way. Have corrected the tag of building=yes, to building=yes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83688226
Mbabani Allan (2020-04-21 07:46:13+00:00): Please take note of tagging the right way. 
Corrected building=yes, to building=yes
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83688265
DP24PH (2020-04-18 23:48:35+00:00): Don't forget to avoid the Departures area for this P2P Bus mapping since most P2P Buses are in Arrivals bay area as designated T3 Bus Terminal.