piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_3216889 (2017-06-20 13:43:58+00:00): Alle stukken gras zijn hierdoor verdwenen. Park is een geheel over gras, bosjes, vijvers paden heen.
Verder was het hele Tolberg park al gemarkeerd.
Wijzigingen door mij ongedaan gemaakt.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-27 21:35:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49874036 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit on boat shops. Please discuss tagging changes on the Tagging mailing list and don't adapt the data immediately afterwards. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58812
indigomc (2017-09-25 17:16:29+00:00): Set useful looking data to OSM notes, reverted the changeset.
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-27 21:35:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49874036 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit on boat shops. Please discuss tagging changes on the Tagging mailing list and don't adapt the data immediately afterwards. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58812
Skinfaxi (2017-06-19 16:12:32+00:00): Versteh ja nur den Kommentar nicht. Finnland?
Dalkvist (2017-06-19 16:24:56+00:00): Hi please remember to add a comment and/or source on the changeset, there are several good imagery sources now and it will help future mappers to know which was used. And the ones from digitalglobe and mapbox require attribution.  
 
In Sweden we mostly use natural:scrub under power lines there are very few places with natural grasslands here.
Skinfaxi (2017-06-19 16:36:16+00:00): Hej Dalkvist, we were diskussion how and why it is impossible to see the powerlines on the digitalglobe imagery att sissjön. but we found no solution. I have never mapped sameting under a powerline, i think it should be just wood and than man-made=cutline?
geri-oc (2017-06-19 16:50:09+00:00): Ja - ich war in Gedanken in Finnlands Wäldern ...
geri-oc (2017-06-19 17:05:31+00:00): Ja - Schweden wäre richtig. Ich war in Gedanken in Finnlands Wälder unterwegs ...

Ja - die Hintergrundquelle ist Digital Globe.

Bei der Breite der "cutline" würde ich schon Fläche nutzen - dann auch natural=scrub. In DE werden die Schneisen aller Enewrgieträger alle 4-5 Jahre freigeschnitten, auch die pipeline=underground.
Dalkvist (2017-06-19 17:28:33+00:00): @Skinifaxi: cutline is more for smaller gaps in the forest like for phone lines or minor power lines on small poles. It is not wrong to use it on for the large ones if you don’t feel like mapping that much detail. I do them as areas mostly because they are useful to break up the forest areas into smaller chunks of “only” a few dozen km per side ;)  
 
I can see the power lines on both lakes http://imgur.com/a/HVxzQ
geri-oc (2017-06-19 18:33:04+00:00): DIESE:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400071748

ist nicht zu sehen

http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=57.7301&mlon=16.3592#map=15/57.7301/16.3592
Skinfaxi (2017-06-21 03:15:41+00:00): Dalkvist: geri-oc ser inte den powetline som gå från öst till väst på bilden. Och även jag ser den inte. Fragan är om den är nybyggd, nedgrävd eller vad som har hänt. Följer du den i västligt riktning drycker den igen upp då alla bilder (höjd med longsjön)
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-27 21:35:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49874036 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit on boat shops. Please discuss tagging changes on the Tagging mailing list and don't adapt the data immediately afterwards. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58812
javbw (2019-10-05 11:11:40+00:00): This changeset, like so many, mis-map residential and alley roads as tracks.  I am working hard to undo all of this bad mapping.
Andy Joiner (2017-06-19 15:58:31+00:00): https://github.com/MarcusWolschon/osmeditor4android/issues
Andy Joiner (2017-06-19 15:59:14+00:00): Oops - I meant photo: https://goo.gl/photos/cvtMRhJR9JPRTNFv9
user_6110846 (2017-11-17 19:00:03+00:00): То є не вірно та кмапити. 
name= Церква Святої Варвари  
Варварівська церква це  розмовна назва  
за документами реєстр у стопудів назва буде не в такому форматі 
destination  = ukrainian_orthodox_mp
Ergerzher (2017-07-23 11:11:26+00:00): Bonjour,
Il y a environ un mois vous avez cartographié des groupes d'arbres au Blosne comme des petits forêts.
Je n'ai jamais vu cette approche. Pourquoi vous utilisez des zones natural=wood plutôt que des points natural=tree ?
Merci
JacquesL (2017-08-03 09:20:04+00:00): Bonjour.
Je me suis posé aussi la question ! Par "facilité", j'ai préféré mettre des "bois" plutôt que des arbres. Ma priorité était de faire ressortir le coté vert du quartier (que je connais bien). Il était plus facile pour moi de cartographier les contours des bosquets plus que de rentrer les arbres un à un. J'ai repris ce qui se fait sur les parcs et jardins d'ailleurs. Où s'arrête l'arbre ou commence le bosquet ???
Ca ne me pose pas de souci, s'il fallait tout remettre en pelouse (pour qu'ensuite quelqu'un fasse l'effort de rentrer tous les arbres).
Au plaisir ! Jacques
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-27 21:35:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49874036 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit on boat shops. Please discuss tagging changes on the Tagging mailing list and don't adapt the data immediately afterwards. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58812
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-27 21:35:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49874036 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit on boat shops. Please discuss tagging changes on the Tagging mailing list and don't adapt the data immediately afterwards. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58812
manings (2017-06-19 19:22:03+00:00): Hi, PanierAvide.  This edit spans the whole US.  Can you point to a documentation in the wiki about this edits.  On quick look this is a mechanical edit and should follow community guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
PanierAvide (2017-06-19 19:43:05+00:00): It is not an automated edit, it was using Maproulette (challenge about aerodromes). Each edit was made manually by myself. However, it spans over the country as Maproulette gives random tasks over the country.
PanierAvide (2017-06-19 19:45:22+00:00): See http://maproulette.org/map/1/117
manings (2017-06-19 20:02:03+00:00): Thanks for reply.  I haven't check the data completely but a quick look seems they are all good.  However, I encourage you to upload as often as possbile so that we don't have a changeset that is too big.  Thanks for mapping.
PanierAvide (2017-06-19 20:14:24+00:00): Oh OK, I was thinking not creating too much changesets was better. I will know it for the next time. Thanks for letting me know :-)
Carnildo (2017-06-19 20:26:23+00:00): Keeping the number of changesets down is okay, as long as the changes are grouped into a small geographic area.  "Cleaned up all the old airports in Pike County" is fine; "cleaned up a hundred old airports scattered around the United States" isn't.  Unfortunately, Maproulette gives you the latter.
PanierAvide (2017-06-19 20:37:27+00:00): Makes sense, but as you said it isn't easy to do so in Maproulette. We have a tool in France named OpenSolarMap which gives random tasks (about roof orientation), but when another task is available nearly, you do this before others. That way you can work on random tasks but in a small area. Maybe Maproulette can be changed to work this way.
kartler175 (2017-06-20 06:27:36+00:00): Was ist die Quelle für Beziechnungen der Waldgebiete? Die Aufteilung erinnert verdächtig an die topographischen Karten der Bayerischen Vermessungverwaltung, die m.W. keine zulässige Quelle für OSM-Daten ist.
Dalkvist (2017-06-19 17:01:54+00:00): I think you pressed q by mistake on http://osm.org/way/501050690 ;)
robbieonsea (2017-06-20 00:05:21+00:00): Can you elaborate which actual streets were missing from the 79 ways that have changed from this edit?
Hjart (2017-06-19 18:08:30+00:00): Please note that I have fixed your edits at Fisketorvet
Aleks-Berlin (2017-07-05 14:00:29+00:00): Hi Anish Thapa, please use tourism=hotel, not menity=hotel. see details here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel
Thanks, Alex
Aleks-Berlin (2017-07-05 14:01:03+00:00): typo amentity not menity
Constable (2017-06-19 19:34:35+00:00): ciao, posso sapere che relazione stai tentando di aggiungere? Pura curiosità.
Grazie mille
Angelo Giuseppe (2017-06-19 21:55:11+00:00): Percorso pedonale nel parco valle del lambro
Constable (2017-06-20 15:04:19+00:00): grazie per la risposta immediata. É un percorso segnalato ed esistente, vero?
Angelo Giuseppe (2017-06-20 15:47:41+00:00): In parte si, è esistente il tracciato da Monza a Erba sulle rive del lambro, è presente la segnaletica nel bosco del Chignolo e Rio Pegorino, il  percorso è una giunzione di vari sentieri esistenti. Eccoti la traccia
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=7345189&map=16!45.6259!9.2377
Ciao
Angelo
Constable (2017-06-21 19:22:55+00:00): ottimo, grazie per la collaborazione!
michageo (2017-06-19 17:09:21+00:00): il giorno 19-06-2017, Sono state aggiunte case di abitazione e fabbricati rurali in tutta l'area di Sorti e , dove necessario corrette le posizioni delle descrizioni
jmania (2017-08-03 09:48:58+00:00): Bu ve buna benzer edit leri neden yaptığınızı öğrenebilirmiyim? openstreetmap datalarına bu tip edit ler yapmaya devam ederseniz sizi admin e şikayet edeceğim.
user_5359 (2017-06-20 15:58:58+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte trage keine priavte Informationen (Übersetzung auf Deutsch: Arbeit Shtro Natasha (Laut Google)) ein. Parkplätze haben übrigens selten tatsächliche Namen
nikhil5 (2019-03-01 05:02:13+00:00): "Hi dewokahuripan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 487551992 classified as 'Pedestrian'.However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,the area seems to be residential and this should be marked as residential road.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
mueschel (2017-06-20 21:30:24+00:00): Hi,
du nutzt hier die Tags
maxweight:lanes:left=12t
mindistance:hgv:lanes:right=50m
Das Suffix :left bzw. :right ist in diesem Zusammenhang nicht definiert - was möchtest du ausdrücken?
Gruß, Jan
Protoxenus (2017-06-21 07:27:24+00:00): Die Brücke ist so um die 50 Jahre alt und nicht für das andauernde Befahren mit 40t-LKW konstruiert. Deshalb gibt es eine Einschränkung: linker Fahrstreifen Fahrzeuge mit maximal 12t, rechter Fahrstreifen mit minimalem Abstand von 50m für LKW. Das habe ich versucht, umzusetzen.
mueschel (2017-06-21 07:32:21+00:00): Alles klar, das würde dann so aussehen:
maxweight:lanes = 12t | 
mindistance:hgv:lanes = | 50
Bei ":lanes" werden einfach die Eigenschaften aller Spuren aufgezählt, von links nach rechts, getrennt mit "|", Spuren ohne Eigenschaften bleiben leer.
Protoxenus (2017-06-21 07:35:38+00:00): Ok, daran hatte ich nicht gedacht. Danke für den Hinweis.
berndw (2017-06-19 17:57:53+00:00): Ortsstraße?
Bei Bing sieht das eher wie eine Parkplatzzufahrt aus.
canfe (2025-03-14 15:37:11+00:00): Le living street non esistono in Italia.
Dovresti convertirle tutte se sai davvero i limiti che ci sono.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street

PS: se chiudi una nota, sarebbe bene, dire cosa hai fatto per chiuderla.
A presto
Marco_Fix (2025-03-15 14:09:47+00:00): Ok, come si può indicare una strada che è chiusa al traffico solo in alcuni orari del giorno? Per ora le rimetto residenziali
canfe (2025-03-15 15:33:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

come esempio

access:conditional=no @ (Mo-Fr 08:00-17:00)
Questo tag indica che la strada è chiusa al traffico nei giorni feriali (lunedì-venerdì) dalle 8:00 alle 17:00
Marco_Fix (2025-03-16 03:10:05+00:00): Grazie mille
GerdP (2018-10-11 08:50:04+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!
Mir sind die zwei Wege mit highway=turning_circle aufgefallen. Dieses Tag gehört nur an Knoten, nicht an Wege. Kann es leider nicht ändern, weil ich mich vor Ort nicht auskenne.
Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 14:03:56+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
SafwatHalaby_bot (2017-06-19 18:23:55+00:00): Total full match modifications: 411
Total scanned: 14307
Total unmodified: 13896


Replace table:
"Xa Наркис": "ХаНаркис",
"Xe Керем": "ХаКерем",
"Менделе Мохер Seforim": "Менделе Мохер Сфарим",
"Xa красный": "ХаРотем",
"Xa Ришоним": "ХаРишоним",
"Xa Нешер": "ХаНешер",
"Xa Хореш": "ХаХореш",
"Azarya Мелех": "Азария ХаМелех",
"Xa Шальдаг": "ХаШальдаг",
"Asa": "Аса",
"Xa Ракевет": "ХаРакевет",
"Xa-Шакед": "ХаШакед",
"Xa-Рамбам": "ХаРамбам",
"Xa-Шита": "ХаШита",
"Нир Aм": "Нир Ам",
"Xa Шилоах": "ХаШилоах",
"Александр Yanai": "Александр Яннай",
"ynнгаt": "Вингейт",
"Xa Шахам": "ХаШахам",
"Xe Керен": "ХаКерен",
"Генерал Адам Yekutiel": "Генерал Йекутиэль Адам",
"Xa Шива": "ХаШива",
"Заменxоф": "Заменхоф",
"Xa Шахам": "ХаШахам"
Hernan (2017-06-19 18:40:15+00:00): Hola Josefina: Fijate que acabas de marcar un área residencial, donde ya había otra área. Si querés marcar estas áreas, deberías respetar, lo que ya hay marcado y no superponerlas.
DaveF (2017-06-20 17:52:38+00:00): Hi
Could you provide your source for the name please.
Pykkles (2017-06-21 21:07:36+00:00): I grew up in the area and this is what everyone calls the park.  New here so not sure if local knowledge is enough.

I'm actually struggling to find an official source for this but perhaps the fact that it's on Manor Road gives enough confidence that I'm not making this up?
DaveF (2017-06-22 11:45:49+00:00): BTW Welcome to OSM.

I've never found an official name, which is why I never named it. I see it more as a leisure=recreation_ground than a park. It certainly shouldn't be tagged as both.

How about 'Manor Road Playing Fields'? http://sports-facilities.co.uk/sites/view/6001121
SafwatHalaby_bot (2017-06-19 18:38:44+00:00): This changeset's description has been wrongly named. It should be: Copied missing name tags and fixed whitespace.
SafwatHalaby_bot (2017-06-19 18:40:20+00:00): Total names copies: 356
Total name to name:en: 51
Total name:he to name: 6
Total name to name:he: 285
Total name:ar to name: 0
Total name to name:ar: 14
Whitespace fixes: 4
Total scanned: 1211
Total unhandled errors: 853
literan (2017-06-20 11:52:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не надо писать в поле name все подряд (например, name=вход в почтовое отделение). Это поле - для названий конкретных объектов имен собственных. У дверей таковых не бывает (равно как и у банкоматов, фонарных столбов и т.п.). Вычищу здесь все подобное.
Kitsune80 (2017-06-20 14:14:48+00:00): Спасибо за поправку. Впредь буду знать.
SHARCRASH (2017-08-24 18:40:18+00:00): Bonjour! Cette haie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501782654 n'existe plus depuis au moins 2015 selon les images satellites SPW(allonie) 2015 aerial imagery. Veuillez ne pas vous fier à des images satellites trop agées. Merci de votre compréhension!
JSe (2017-06-20 17:08:28+00:00): Lieber User "Designboy",

Du hast gestern mit diesem Änderungssatz die Häuser in der Rochlitzer Straße in Mittweida einheitlich getaggt (Adressen am Building Objekt). Leider haben die meisten dieser Häuser eine Adress-Note (Anmerkung Adresse). Damit wurden i.d.R. in der OSM-Anfangszeit Adressen erfasst, für die es noch keine Hausumrisse gab. Diese "Alt-Adressen" und Deine vollkommen korrekt ergänzten neuen Adressen führen leider zu doppelten Adressen. 
Qualitätssicherungstools wie OSMSuspects! "meckern" solche Duplikate zurecht an, siehe hier: 
https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/#18/50.98598/12.97676/osm-outsideplz-dupes
Da Du mit JOSM arbeitest, läßt sich das recht einfach beheben: Das Gebäude und Adress-Note gleichzeitig markieren und im JOSM-Menu unter Daten "Adresspunkte vereinen" anklicken.
Desweiteren hattest Du allen Adressen eine falsche PLZ zugeordnet, das hat aber schon ein anderer Mapper korrigiert.

Ich hoffe, ich habe Dich mit dieser Anmerkung nicht entmutigt und wünsche Dir viel Spaß beim weiteren Mappen.

MfG. JSe
bus-mt (2017-08-06 11:38:51+00:00): Hallo Galbinus,
Du schreibst, Du hast "Radfahrer verboten" hinzugefügt, tatsächlich ist aber "motor_vehicle=no" in den Daten dazugekommen - war das ein Versehen?
Ist mittlerweile gefixt. Radfahrer sind da übrigens durch "motorroad=yes" schon ausgesperrt.
Gruß aus dem Kalletal
Matthias
TourenbikerFKB (2017-08-06 15:35:07+00:00): übrigens steht an einigen Teilstücken der B1 name=B1 in den Daten. Steht da wirklich ein entsprechendes Straßenschild?
Galbinus (2017-08-13 11:49:48+00:00): name=B1 stammt eindeutig nicht von mir, wurde im Gegenteil bereits dort, wo es mir auffiel bereits gelöscht.
Hjart (2017-06-19 20:02:12+00:00): Du fik rodet et cykelcenter og en cafe sammen her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4885825879
Tomas Kovacik (2017-06-20 07:05:32+00:00): ahoj,

rieseniem zle otagovanych objektov nieje ich zmazanie, revertni to a daj objektom spravne tagy, spoj celistve parkovacie miesta do jedneho parkoviska a kludne pridaj cestu, ale mazanie naozaj nie.

dik

t.
t_ja (2017-06-26 18:30:14+00:00): Ahoj Tomas,
v podstate s tebou suhlasim, ze trebalo spojit dane plochy. Ale teraz uz nema vyznam robit revert, lebo po spojeni do jednej plochy ostane len jedna cesta a par rohovych bodov a kvoli tomu obnovovat vsetky povodne body a vsetky povodne cesty je overkill. Riesenim je zakreslit to rovno ako jednu suvislu plochu s par bodmi.

Tibor
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-27 21:35:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49874036 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit on boat shops. Please discuss tagging changes on the Tagging mailing list and don't adapt the data immediately afterwards. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58812
streckenkundler (2017-06-20 10:36:47+00:00): Hei,

gibt es eine Disskussion/ einen Beschluß zur Änderung von canoe_rental zu canoe:rental??

Das Wiki wurde auch ohne Disskussion geändert. Bitte stoppe die Änderung.

Vergleiche auch:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=651383#p651383

Danke.

streckenkundler
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-17 17:32:40+00:00): Hi! You added a way here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501806361#map=19/52.70627/-8.73282 ) but you didn't put any tags on it. I've deleted it now, to clean up. But maybe you should remap it with the correct attributes (path/track/etc)
Senihtu (2024-07-04 14:56:25+00:00): Hallo!
Ich habe eine Frage zu diesem alten Changeset.
Du hast beim Restaurant Bürgelstollen beim Walschwimmbad Kronberg "biergarten=yes" eingetragen.
Der JOSM-Validator meint, den Wert kenne er nicht.
Gibt es dort wirklich einen Biergarten (bei dem die Brotzeit mitgebracht werden darf)?
Oder sollte besser "outdoor_seating=yes" eingetragen werden?
mweper (2017-06-21 21:48:07+00:00): Hola de nuevo. Tuve que revertir y corregir tu edición porque habías "aplanado" varias edificios. Hay que editar con cuidado y revisar antes de subir.
El cambio es este: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49724866
mweper (2017-06-21 21:51:10+00:00): Otra cosa, según convención en la wiki, los nombres de las escuelas se escriben sin la abreviación "Nº" y sin comillas. Por ej. «Escuela 123 San Martín» en lugar de «Escuela Nº 123 "San Martín"»
-
También, en la información de teléfono se le agrega el "+54". Por ej. "+54 341 123-45678"

Saludos.
extremecarver (2017-06-19 22:10:16+00:00): I'm pretty sure this roundabout is usable - so construction key needs to be removed.
StefanB (2017-06-21 22:41:20+00:00): There is no construction tag on the roundabout (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300682837 ) since 8 months ago.
lakedistrict (2017-06-19 22:24:53+00:00): I notice that the survey dates say 2016. Is this correct or did you mean 2017?
Hjart (2017-06-20 08:56:33+00:00): hvorfor bruger du contact:website tags?
mikini (2017-06-20 09:37:51+00:00): Fordi
1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact giver indtryk af at tagning med namespace er "den nye rigtige måde"  (formuleringen "the old tags")
2) jeg synes kategoriseringen giver mening (især i editorer med sorterede lister af tags giver det nemt overblik over kontaktoplysninger)
3) jeg finder det inkonsekvent  at skulle tagge uden namespace for gængse kontaktoplysninger (website, phone, facebook) og med for mindre gængse (instagram, skype etc.)

Men jeg kan dog godt se at det er et ret omdiskuteret emne med holdninger fra prominente OSM-navne (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2012-April/009916.html, https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2011-May/007645.html, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:contact). Har engang tjekket efter, og konstateret at de databrugere jeg selv anvender alle kigger både uden og med contact-namespace. Derfor er min antagelse at det er den udbredte praksis i applikationer, og at tilføjelse af namespacet derfor mindst bidrager med orden/kategorisering og ikke ødelægger noget.
Hjart (2017-06-20 09:41:24+00:00): Hvad jeg specielt har lagt mærke til er: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:contact#Deprecate_this_tag_family
frasty (2017-07-03 00:00:33+00:00): Ciao,
Vedo che sei nuovo e che usi l'editor ID. Ti invito a considerare in futuro l'uso di un editor più preciso e completo come Josm. In genere ID si utilizza per modifiche minori che non richiedono grande precisione geometrica. Ciao!
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-20 11:41:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52208464 where the changeset comment is: Revert all Itzscallywagyt changesets that had not be reverted already. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1482
Gumeg (2017-10-24 07:30:11+00:00): Добрый день! А для чего вы пробовали создавать отношение https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7343996 вокруг лужайки? Отношение типа "граница" - для административных границ.
Gumeg (2017-11-16 12:05:36+00:00): Удалил его
DaveF (2017-06-20 18:07:06+00:00): Hi
Is there a reason you moved The Cove's location?
http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/visit/places/stanton-drew-circles-and-cove/history-and-research/
DaveF (2017-06-20 18:14:14+00:00): Allow me to correct myself. It is in the pub's garden & EH have located it in the wrong place
robbieonsea (2017-06-20 21:33:08+00:00): Yes indeed I moved it, as can be seen fairly clearly on Bing aerial imagery - which aligned to my GPS trace (albeit that ended on path entrance to the pub garden).
The Code stones are directly in line from that path entrance at the back of the pub garden.
Alan (2017-06-20 16:03:14+00:00): I'm confused, you say "updating leaf type", but this doesn't seem to be a tree. It's an address node, and there is a confusing building tag, too. Can you clarify what you intended to map with this feature?
Константин Гам (2018-10-25 13:44:22+00:00): Вы уверены что здесь установлены знаки запрещающие движение на велосипеде?
xronos (2018-11-07 13:07:35+00:00): да, есть таблички запрещающие любое движение
Константин Гам (2018-11-07 14:59:19+00:00): Незаконно установленные, как всегда :)
harikasid (2019-03-07 03:27:38+00:00): "Hi restudyah,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, came across way 437490243 way 437490341 way 437490523 way 437489276 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery,no imagery is supporting to retain the data.

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
streinger (2017-06-20 10:32:16+00:00): проезд открыт полностью от Народной до Охотской или там всё ещё блоки лежат?
Портнов Максим (2017-08-17 08:02:45+00:00): открыт полностью - застройщик нового дома по Народной за свой счет обустроил дорогу
streinger (2017-08-17 08:28:54+00:00): то, что там дорога есть знаю, я про блоки спрашивал,  на данный момент навигатор там не поведёт, т.к. после вашей правки другой пользователь  нарисовал там блок, раньше там они действительно лежали, и если сейчас их там нет, то этот барьер с карты нужно убрать.
chnav (2017-06-20 06:15:25+00:00): Здравствуйте, у дома реальный адрес 11-44, или это номер вашей квартиры ? В первом случае, т.е. двойной адрес, я сделаю адресную точку. Во втором случае номер квартиры надо удалить.