piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2019-04-08 10:43:01+00:00): Hi, I am reviewing this changeset because according to your profile you are a new mapper. In JOSM I ran the validation tool and noticed next unsolved issues ( a validators job to solve them) 
19 warning, most of them connections between highway to buildings. crossing buildings and highways
11 unsquared buildings and 4 overlapping areas. 
Also a lot of buildings were poor mapped ( oversized or inaccurate or mapped a cluster of buildings as 1.)
I will correct these.  Please stick to mapping till you have enough expericene to become a validator. 
This webpage shows your mappings
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68602476
This one after I adjusted them
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69001633
Thanks for- and keep mapping
Truchin (2019-04-02 12:42:24+00:00): C'est un peu le bazar dans la station du métro Gare du Nord. (à ne pas confondre la position d'arrêt de chacune des lignes)  
Elle existe à présent en triple voire quadruple exemplaires alors qu'elle devrait être unique.
Peux tu regarder comment corriger cela ?

Bonne continuation
Thomas
Florent972 (2019-04-02 16:37:43+00:00): Je viens de renommer les deux points pour faire la différence, la gare de surface à "Paris" avant (tel que c'est indiqué sur les panneaux dans la gare) tandis que le point pour lé métro je l'ai déplacé au croisement entre la rue de Dunkerque et la rue du Faubourg Saint-Denis vu que le croisement des deux lignes de métro est situé là.
Truchin (2019-04-02 20:22:15+00:00): ça me semble pas mal.
La Gare du Nord USFRT n'est pas une gare mais un site de formation.
A priori, il n'est pas utile de mettre (métro) ou (RER) puisque ce n'est pas le nom de la station mais un descriptif du réseau.
Voili voilà !
eggie (2019-03-27 23:19:19+00:00): Hoi.. 'k Zou alleen niets aan wegen (fietspad) plakken. Vaak geeft dat later ellende. 
Gr eggie
viloan (2019-03-27 20:23:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Andrea Musuruane (2019-03-28 08:58:07+00:00): Ciao. Hai disegnato un landuse=industrial dentro a un landuse=farmyard precedentemente inserito. Questo non è possibile. Ci deve essere solo un landuse. Ciao, Andrea
mikki65 (2019-03-30 11:04:31+00:00): ho modificato e' una azienda che commercializza sottoprodotti del riso non un azienda agricola
DGerveno (2019-03-30 18:50:27+00:00): No edites "pasos de cebra" en las intersecciones de las sendas. Lo dejo corregido.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
Por favor, consulta la wiki en caso de duda antes de poner cosas sin sentido.
jcarlson (2019-03-27 20:50:24+00:00): Ah, heck. Sorry about the size of the extent rectangle!
eggie (2019-03-27 22:35:22+00:00): Ahh.. Je hebt hier de building=yes 
of building=school) verwijderd. Het zal straks niet meer renderen. Kijk even in de wiki hoe je een school hoort te taggen.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-03-27 22:41:06+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik hersteld met behulp van de BGT. amenity school verwijderd. Dat staat al op de node. name= nog toevoegen als je die weet.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-03-27 22:43:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=school?uselang=nl
microkid (2019-03-28 04:36:57+00:00): Er stond geen building, vreemd genoeg.
eggie (2019-03-28 07:29:06+00:00): Hoi.. Hier zie je wat je hebt gedaan. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68603810
In de BGT (kadaster) die ik als achtergrond gebruik zit die uitbreiding er al aan vast. Jouw amenity = school heb ik verwijderd en het oorspronkelijke gebouw uitgebreid. 
De school heeft ook een naam.
Het is CBS De Ceder. 
Je had ook nog eenkeer een  node gemaakt met amenity=school. 
Dat is dubbel. Die heb ik samengevoegd met adresnode 1A. Nu moet je daar alleen de naam nog aan toevoegen en evt. de website=http://www.cederveenendaal.nl/
Je kunt ook kiezen om voor het schoolterrein, maar dan niet de node gebruiken als amenity.
Succes,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-28 23:18:01+00:00): naam en website toegevoegd op adresnode
woodpeck (2019-04-16 17:23:08+00:00): Dear Perrine L, thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. In this changeset you have added more than 50 roads and marked them to be "secondary" roads, which is a relatively big type of road. On the available aerial imagery, these roads look more like agricultural tracks and hence could have been marked "track" instead of "secondary". Has anyone already contacted you about the issue?

(automatic translation)
Chère Perrine L, merci de votre contribution à OpenStreetMap. Dans cet ensemble de modifications, vous avez ajouté plus de 50 routes et les avez désignées comme routes "secondaires", ce qui représente un type de route relativement important. Sur les images aériennes disponibles, ces routes ressemblent davantage à des pistes agricoles et auraient donc pu être marquées "piste" au lieu de "secondaires". Quelqu'un vous a-t-il déjà contacté à ce sujet?
Perloche (2019-04-17 06:52:12+00:00): Dear woodpeck, you are the first person reviewing my inputs to this project. Thank a lot for that! Indeed, I am new with the terminology of open street map, and indicated secondary With the ambition to be neutral. Thanks for reviewing and commenting. May I ask you wether mapping these ahricultural tracks is relevant to the project?
Perrine
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-27 21:33:14+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 66175572, 66175588, 66175614, 68441794, 68441861, 68457362.
ovruni (2019-06-10 05:12:28+00:00): Hola BikeRoad, los nodos de los centros educativos importados cuentan con información que debería de mantenerse en las áreas que reemplacen a estos nodos. Por lo cual he recuperado las etiquetas de los nodos 5361453978 y 5361453977.
Saludos
BikeRoad (2019-06-12 22:44:13+00:00): Hola Omar.
Gracias por la recomendacion. Ya no elimanaré los POI de centros educativos.
ລາວ (2019-03-28 00:05:54+00:00): Hallo Dachshund,
ist das Multipolygon http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9438579 so beabsichtigt?
sjevtic (2019-04-15 11:00:17+00:00): Please add local communities to their corresponding municipalities with the subarea tag.
Galbinus (2019-06-04 12:11:57+00:00): In Note steht: kein place=suburb (suburb wird meist ausschliesslich in (Gross)-städten für deren zusammengewachsenen Siedlungsteile verwendet) - das stimmt nicht: siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:place - für den Stadtteil Horn, ehemals eigentständige Kleinstadt, ist place=Suburb die richtige Einordnung.
ep060205 (2019-06-05 04:31:01+00:00): Hallo Galbinus,

die Information meiner note:place an Objekt Horn (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/428852868) stammte/basierte eher auf die drei anderen wiki-Artikel, die ich mir dazu angeschaut hatte:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dsuburb
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place#Populated_settlements.2C_urban

Von daher würde ich dafür, wie geschrieben, kein p=suburb verwenden. 

Nebenbei, falls Dir p=village zu klein ist und Dir p=town besser gefällt, dann wäre das für mich auch OK. 

Viele Grüsse
ep

PS: Die Info' dies als eher als p=suburb zu definieren kam in dem von Dir genannten wiki-Artikel durch diese Änderung herein:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=DE:Key:place&diff=next&oldid=735006

Man könnte mal nachforschen, ob der Inhalt diese Änderung überhaupt mal in einem grösseren Rahmen besprochen wurde, denn eine Quelle wurde für diese Änderung nicht so im Detail genannt. Der Kommentar lautete:
"Müllabfuhr und Wiederapassung an die englische Wikiseite. Wurde auch schon auf der Diskussionsseite moniert, was hier teilweise für Mist stand."
Galbinus (2019-06-05 12:37:03+00:00): Jedenfalls übersetzt die Standardkarte den Place Horn mit Dorf Horn. In der Hinsicht ist man gerade im ländlichen Raum eigen. Horn war schon vor dem Zusammenschluss mit Bad Meinberg und den anderen Stadtteilen eine Stadt und ist es nach wie vor. Daher mein Vorschlag: Horn-Bad Meinberg insgesamt als town, den Stadtteil Horn als suburb, bei Bad Meinberg könnte man noch diskutieren ob suburb oder village - ich tendiere zu suburb, bei den anderen zugehörigen Dörfern (Leopoldstal, ... ) village einordnen.
Galbinus (2019-06-05 12:40:36+00:00): Oder ist es so gemeint, dass an den Stadtteil mit dem Verwaltungssitz (Rathaus, Stadtrat) place=town kommt und nicht an den Node "Horn-Bad Meinberg"?
ep060205 (2019-06-06 12:41:09+00:00): Hallo Galbinus,

wie gesagt, für Siedlungsplatz Horn kommt laut dem Verständnis der 3 von mir genannten wiki-Artikeln kein suburb (zusammengewachsener Siedlungsplatzsteil von einem sehr grossen Einzelplatzsiedlung, sagen wir mal ab 10.000 Einwohner oder auch erst ab 100.000 Einwohnern, das könnte man mal noch diskutieren) in Frage.

place=town wird verwendet für Siedluungsgebiete ab ca. 10k Einwohner, d.h. für Horn ist es grenzwertig, man könnte aber auch p=town benutzen, schrieb ich ja schon. Für die fiktive gebildete Verwaltungseinheit, auch "Stadt", bzw. Stadtgemeinde genannt "Horn-Bad Meinberg" passt p=town nicht, da m.E. p=town ins Zentrum eines bebauten Siedlungsplatzes gehört. Daher hatte ich dafür auch p=municipality (Gemeinde/Stadtgemeinde) verwendet, siehe Punkt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240082144

Ja ich denke ich verstehe was Du meinst, für Horn mit ca. 7000 Einwohner ist p=village grenzwertig

Das hatte ich nur so von den Vorgänger:
"Jan Mathys"
übernommen, siehe v2:
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/428852868

Ich habe soeben daraus ein p=town gemacht, siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70988407
da dann z.B. der Unterschied zum ländlichen Leopoldtal besser deutlich wird.

Viele Grüsse
ep
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-28 08:47:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68616841 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a suspicious edit in Romania.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2623.
Glassman (2019-03-28 05:43:18+00:00): I'm troubled by the number of additions all over the world using Maps.Me. Where did this data come from?
moreno96 (2019-03-29 19:12:18+00:00): Isn't it an unwelcome mistake? For all over the world
Eduard Rene (2023-10-31 08:18:09+00:00): Hello!
Hope this finds you well.
I am mapping in Tonga related to project #15690 in HOT.
I don't see this road anymore in the imagery but I don't want to delate it, You are a big mapper and I would like your feedback about it, if it is possible. 
Many thanks!
adiatmad (2023-11-20 13:14:02+00:00): Hello, Eduard Rene!
Hope you don't mind if I join the discussion.
As I can see, Hendrikklaas added the road data based on both satellite imagery and survey
(https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68606566) so I will leave it as is like you mentioned.
RobJN (2019-05-16 19:52:13+00:00): Thank you for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. Find out more about the local community and how we can help at https://osmuk.org/
Glassman (2019-03-28 05:37:47+00:00): A couple of tips - first highway=footway + footway=sidewalk should only be used when the footway is next to a street. So the footway that goes between the houses would just be highway=footway. 

Second, when a footway crosses a street it should be tagged as highway=footway + footway=crossing. And if you know if the curbs have curb ramps then add kerb=lowered as a node where the ramp is located. See Stockton Lane SE near Compton Blvd SE for and example.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68607022
Glassman (2019-03-28 05:39:14+00:00): You keep adding all of those driveways, Amazon will be hiring you :-)
viloan (2019-03-28 00:12:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_11166885 (2020-07-06 19:51:07+00:00): Fonts of A9 prolungament from Umag to Dragonja?
Badojo (2020-07-06 20:06:44+00:00): No, that's a different road which is not a motorway, after Umag interchange it is an expressway and afer the roundabout it a normal road
user_11166885 (2020-07-06 20:09:45+00:00): I meant the "suspicious road"
Badojo (2020-07-06 20:10:44+00:00): Oh, can you link the exact location?
user_11166885 (2020-07-06 20:12:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679933278#map=15/45.4555/13.6367&layers=N
Badojo (2020-07-06 20:18:19+00:00): Well, that's just a proposed motorway that probably goes to somwhere around Koper, I'm don't really know much about it
Badojo (2020-07-06 20:26:14+00:00): There are articles about it, but they are on Croatian and Slovenian: (https://web.archive.org/web/20110609194845/http://www.dars.si/Dokumenti/O_avtocestah/V_gradnji/Gradnja_-_nacrti_189.aspx)
user_11166885 (2020-07-07 11:13:27+00:00): Thanks
Karthoo (2019-03-28 20:33:58+00:00): Hey Allen, you're doing a great job mapping Mansfield! Keep up the good work!
Your Village Maps (2021-04-18 21:43:37+00:00): The key for a pedestrian crossing is highway=crossing, *not* highway=traffic_signals; however, you may add crossing=traffic_signals if it is a signalised crosswalk.

I will correct those at the intersection of Main Street and Jefferson Avenue in downtown Peoria as an example.
viloan (2019-03-28 02:34:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Retired Account (2019-05-02 14:03:22+00:00): Hi,
Can you stop spamming parks where it doesn't exist? If it is not defined as a park anywhere else, it is not a park and at most a grass patch.
Davie Dean (2019-03-30 11:26:33+00:00): Armidale Secondary College is currently at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/172412504 (I haven't updated it as such yet, because I wanted to check on the ground), while the main campus indicated here is under construction. Please don't revert the landuse=construction again without checking with someone local.
Davie Dean (2019-03-30 11:28:28+00:00): (construction isn't expect to finish until end 2020)
aharvey (2019-03-31 07:49:14+00:00): Hey David, I'm so sorry about messing up here. You're right I should have checked with you first, via a changeset comment, since you set it to construction.
Geogast (2019-07-19 20:48:53+00:00): It seems that in this changeset, you disconnected several residential streets from the primary street and connected them to the cycleway (that runs parallel to the primary street). Could you please fix that?
mapcraft (2019-07-22 15:24:21+00:00): My apologies.  I believe the residential streets are now connected to the highway rather than the cycleway.  I will be more careful in the future when I am using 'wireframe'.  Your comment is greatly appreciated, thank you!
Warin61 (2019-03-28 06:25:16+00:00): Hi,
The relation 3864716 that was the park had more information on it than what you have in your new way for the park. 
Once you have copied the information over from the old tags on the relation 3864716 it can be deleted- it is no longer closed and generating error messages.
NotJim99 (2019-03-28 03:44:00+00:00): *west coast
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:46:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
Warin61 (2019-03-28 04:03:52+00:00): Hey there .. that was quick. 

You may find one of teh quality checking tools usefull 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=150.84768&lat=-33.48886&zoom=11&opacity=0.74&overlays=nodes_with_empty_k,ways_with_empty_k,nodes_with_empty_v,ways_with_empty_v,node_tags_with_whitespace,way_tags_with_whitespace,node_with_unusual_char,way_with_unusual_char,no_feature_tag_nodes,no_feature_tag_ways,ways_without_tags
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-03-28 20:07:14+00:00): Não grude áreas com vias como fez aqui
mavl (2019-07-21 15:06:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:06:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:07:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:07:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
jmapb (2019-03-28 14:39:28+00:00): Hi ibecze, welcome to Openstreetmap!

Juts FYI, it's not generally not necessary to add city and state fields within NYC, as these can be inferred from the administrative boundaries and zip codes. Adding city and state (and even country) is not wrong per se -- but it saves time and space to leave them out, so that's why you'll see lots of addresses without them.

Let me know if you have any questions -- I'm happy to assist or advise.

Thanks, jmapb
ibecze (2019-03-29 00:05:21+00:00): Hi jmapb,

Thank you for the advice. This was my very first edit on openstreetmap.org and didn't realize that the tags below included the city and the state.

I do have a question for you. The reason I was trying to edit this entry was that if you search for "530 W 45th Street, New York, NY" this node [i.e. Duane Reade (4709047191)] will come up. However the address of this Duane Reade is "530 5th Avenue", and it should not be found in a search for the above mentioned search. I was trying to change the address of Duane Reade, but when I click on the search result (in the left panel), it shows correctly "Fifth Avenue" in the addr:street tag. I noticed that if I go to nominatim.openstreetmap.org and search for the same address (i.e. "530 W 45th Street, New York, NY") the search result details for this Duane Reade has "West 45th Street" as "highway:secondary" in the Address section. I believe this is what causing the Duane Reade store coming up in the search, but this information on nominatim.openstreetmap.org cannot be edited. Do you know how to do it?

Thank you,
ibecze
jmapb (2019-03-29 02:35:42+00:00): This is an interesting problem!

I think it's caused by the fact that the value of the addr:street tag is "Fifth Avenue" while the official name of the street on the map is "5th Avenue". You'd think Nominatim would be smart enough to know that they're the same... until you consider that it would have to know alternate spelling rules in 50+ different languages, and know which ones are likely to apply in what regions. Solvable problems, for sure, but I don't think they're solved in Nominatim at this point.

So, if I'm right, it searches for a match to "Fifth Avenue" and doesn't find it, so it just takes the closest street -- which is West 45th Street. (The Duane Reade node is slightly closer to West 45th Street.) That's my best guess.

(The "highway:secondary" thing just indicates how major a road West 45th Street is -- it doesn't mean that it's a second road that's associated with the Duane Reade POI.)

So I'd say try changing the addr:street from "Fifth Avenue" to "5th Avenue" and see if that fixes the problem. (Note that if the node is inside a building that itself has address tags, as this one does, you could also just remove all the address tags and it will inherit from the building it's in. This is a nice shortcut for POI nodes in single-address buildings.)

Good luck, J
jmapb (2019-03-29 02:37:44+00:00): (Oh, PS, after you make address changes it may take a while for Nominatim to update.)
ibecze (2019-03-29 04:26:24+00:00): Hi J,

You were correct.,I entered "5th Avenue" instead of "Fifth Avenue", and that solved the problem. (This POI doesn't seem to be linked to the building as parent, so the inheritance didn't work. That will be another thing to learn for another day.)

Thanks again, I
marczoutendijk (2022-02-09 19:55:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679971040#map=16/46.0454/127.3786

Building=k??
What did you want to tell us there?
Marc.
katpatuka (2022-02-10 04:44:06+00:00): a kiln.
marczoutendijk (2022-02-10 08:39:44+00:00): Thanks!
I changed the other one 400m to the east! :)
katpatuka (2022-02-10 08:42:04+00:00): Thnak you ;)
andrewwiseman (2019-04-08 19:20:47+00:00): This is not a building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679972663
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:45:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..