piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
سامبا (2018-09-01 21:22:57+00:00): As salamu alaikum, These are two examples where you converted an Arabic village name in Iraq to a persian Name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2487917997 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401251582. There are some more, I will correct them now.
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
literan (2016-12-13 11:40:32+00:00): и правда, не совсем разобрались (хотя в основном все сделали правильно). Мультиполигон создали корректно, но: 1. Продублировали внешнюю линию (удалил) 2. Про тег area=yes вообще забудьте. Он нужен только в одном случае - пешеходные площади отрисовывать. А что, школа действительно такая кривая? Если что, в iD есть инструмент для выпрямления углов...
Наталья Бурага (2016-12-13 11:49:55+00:00): Яндекс видит эту школу именно так. По моим документам с посадкой здания конфигурация д/с так же совпадает. Нельзя суда фото приложить,  а так бы выслала. На почту не смогла ответить. По поводу поправок, спасибо.
literan (2016-12-13 16:42:34+00:00): фото, да, не приложить - только если выложить кудато (на яндекс.фотки к примеру) и сюда ссылку бросить
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2016-12-13 16:40:33+00:00): Замена тега building=yes на building=office это хорошо, но это только тип здания. А для того, чтобы указать конкретный офис, нужен отдельный тег office. В интернете удалось найти, что это строительная компания ООО "ПСК "ДОМ". Причём слово "Дом" они заключают в кавычки, как имя собственное. Для имени собственного как раз используется тег name. Для строительной компании на странице [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:office] нет специального тега, поэтому можно было бы использовать:  
building=office  
office=company  
name=Дом  
official_name=ООО «ПСК «Дом»  
  
Но в taginfo есть редкий, но подходящий тег office=construction [http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/office=construction]. Можно использовать его:  
building=office  
office=construction  
name=Дом  
official_name=ООО «ПСК «Дом»
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
cquest (2016-12-13 12:42:15+00:00): modifié en landuse=construction si il sagit d'une zone en travaux...
ChristopheMaes_210181 (2016-12-13 23:04:16+00:00): J'ai indiqué que les éléments supprimés de la carte l'étaient suite à démolition. Mais aujourd'hui, la construction du lotissement est terminée et habitée. Je pense qu'il s'agit désormais d'une zone résidentiel.
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
arcanma (2016-12-25 09:37:13+00:00): Eleonora, il parcheggio creato ha il perimetro non chiuso correttamente, la way è collegata all'edificio e torna indietro, creando un percorso autointersecante. Anche l'edificio di Oviesse non è corretto, è tracciato seguendo la linea del tetto ricavata da immagini Bing. Leggere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Buildings per informazioni su come mappare gli edifici. Più in generale credo sia necessario che tu dia uno sguardo a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Beginners%27_guide. Grazie per la collaborazione
aceman444 (2017-04-29 01:02:06+00:00): Zdravim, naozaj su tu 2 lekarne vedla seba? A naozaj funguju? Hovorilo sa, ze budovu Apollo zburaju a preto boli vsetky obchody vystahovane. Nie su to len stare napisy?
*Martin* (2017-04-30 08:00:24+00:00): Ahoj. Tak som to tam vtedy videl. Nevchádzal som do budovy aby som to preveril.
aceman444 (2017-04-30 08:04:48+00:00): No asi to budu stare neplatne napisy, Cosmed sa uz napr. prestahoval: http://www.cosmed.sk/kontakt
BB3, Prievozska 6 je o par budov dalej.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:16:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Commodoortje (2016-12-14 08:47:13+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-12-14 08:51:06+00:00): Gertjan,

Je hebt de woningen naar de andere kant van de Frederica van Schaikstraat verplaatst. Maar zou het niet kunnen zijn dat de weg verplaatst had moeten worden? 
Ben je misschien in de gelegenheid om een met een gps een track op te nemen om zo de positie van de weg te kunnen bepalen?
Ik heb een note geplaatst omdat ik denk dat de huizen in eerste instantie juist waren gepositioneerd.
Alvast dank voor je reactie.
GertjanRoke (2016-12-14 18:20:29+00:00): Beste Commodoortje,

Het zou kunne  dat de straat nog een keer verplaatst moet worden. Maar de huizen staan nu goed. Ik ga er namelijk zelf wonen  : )
Vandaar dat ik ze nog even naar de goede kan hadden gezet.

Als ik er woon kan ik nog wel een keer kijken met een gps of het allemaal goed staat.
Commodoortje (2016-12-14 19:33:41+00:00): Lijkt me persoonlijk onwaarschijnlijk dat de huizen goed staan nu. Of de medewerker van de BAG moet zich vreselijk vergist hebben!
marczoutendijk (2016-12-14 20:46:42+00:00): Als ik hier kijk:
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=190857.82&geometry.y=505534.4&zoomlevel=6
Zie ik heel wat anders dan Gertjan heeft ingetekend. Zo te zien moet de straat worden verplaatst naar het zuidoosten, want de straat ligt t.o. huisnummer 20 zoals je in bovenstaande link kunt zien. Wie corrigeert?
Het feit dat je ergens gaat wonen wil nog niet zeggen dat je ook weet of de panden op de juiste coordinaten liggen!
marczoutendijk (2016-12-14 20:50:28+00:00): En voor de duidelijkheid:
Huisnummer 32 in de Frederica van Schaickstraat ligt dus tegenover Anna Nabermanlaan 18. Er moet dus flink worden teruggeschoven met straat EN huizen.
GertjanRoke (2016-12-14 21:06:30+00:00): Zo beter?
marczoutendijk (2016-12-14 21:27:06+00:00): Lijkt me wel, maar ik zou Commodoortje ook nog gewoon een controle met hernieuwde BAG import laten doen.
Commodoortje (2016-12-14 23:18:36+00:00): Marc, jouw conclusie was ook de mijne, was verkeerd gepositioneerd, inmiddels door dvdhoven verlegd naar de juiste positie.
Gertjan heeft inmiddels het huizenblok opgepakt en verplaatst naar bijna de juiste positie. 
Voor de nauwkeurigheid heb ik nog 66cm verder verplaatst.

Nu staat alles weer op de juiste plek.
In de situatie van Gertjan was zijn achtertuin wel heel klein geworden. ;-)
Goed gezien dat er iets onuist was.
(in dit geval de weg)
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-13 14:13:05+00:00): Tu devrais utiliser un compte d'import pour ceci. Est-ce que tu as de la documentation sur le wiki pour ce import?
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:16:20+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:16:29+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
evod (2017-01-12 21:23:45+00:00): Hi, wieso hast du die Info vom Gebäude in einen Punkt extrahiert? Die Info am Gebäude war meiner Meinung nach passender - jetzt sieht man auf der Karte auch zwei Cafes statt einem.
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:16:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:49:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44151319, 44105238, 44127540, 44117498, 44095323, 44090371, 44115857, 44142301, 44115747, 44095990, 44076764, 44151536, 44103719, 44076948, 44086754, 44142057, 44077143, 44088709, 44090031, 44117920, 44147496, 44148457, 44116945, 44089731, 44117231, 44160662, 44151194, 44103294, 44162807, 44049218, 44146868, 44120379, 44086463, 44105435, 44118548, 44075180, 44095678, 44139231, 44127700, 44119854, 44076363, 44139511, 44149374, 44120597, 44117738, 44085388, 44049801, 44076535, 44160883, 44118030, 44149188, 44159984, 44147074, 44119479, 44147291, 44118907, 44127096, 44149593, 44139786, 44150655.
Osm1980 (2017-01-30 16:33:54+00:00): manzoreton az pointe pub chieh?
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2019-01-13 17:18:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:17:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
dgitto (2016-12-13 12:38:43+00:00): Is it ok? why building=university?
and why now there is a museum without name and a name="museum..." without museum tag?
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2019-01-13 17:18:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2019-01-13 17:18:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:18:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
nlehuby (2016-12-13 18:48:28+00:00): Attention, ta relation vers Libération (2504515) est à la fois membre et parent de ta relation route_master (6789691).
overflorian (2016-12-14 09:03:57+00:00): Merci j'ai corrigé ça. C'est dingue la vitesse à laquelle tu peux faire une erreur avec ces relations de relations. Même en s'appliquant bien ... on a vraiment besoin d'un outil adapté !
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-12 09:01:24+00:00): Proszę, zerknij na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5162694

czy te plany realne są?
Myazyk (2020-08-31 16:35:21+00:00): Ви впевнені, що там у кущах, за 150 метрів від дороги є пост ДАІ?
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:16:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:16:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Athalis (2016-12-22 16:13:01+00:00): Hello Paul,

as I mapped in the HOT projects in this area I'm interested why you deleted the landuse=residential. Should settlements outside a city not be tagged with it? Not that I'm upset or even angry about this deletion, just want to know if there was something wrong about adding them in the first place.
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:16:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
trigpoint (2016-12-13 19:10:09+00:00): Bourns Office is a very odd name for a mobile phone shop, are you really sure about this?
trigpoint (2016-12-20 16:38:13+00:00): Reverted after maps.me user didn't respond
Luuuddooo (2016-12-14 00:15:20+00:00): Bonjour, il y a déjà un magasin de sport Décathlon cartographié ici: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4338115172, ça me parait étrange qu'il y en ai deux différents dans le même bâtiment.
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
user_5359 (2016-12-13 19:50:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
user_5359 (2016-12-13 19:46:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you really want to paint circle? I can’t see a circle on the arial images.

I have revert your changeset. If this isn’t an error, please communicate with me, we find a solution. You are welcome!
user_5359 (2016-12-13 19:38:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t write a description (House) as name to the objects.

Please check the existing and positioning of the "Rih Drive“.
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:27:27+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-13 16:26:23+00:00): Why are you deleting a bunch of objects instead of updating the existing objects?? Same with this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44371614
de vries (2016-12-13 19:39:56+00:00): Because those object are also removed in the database they were imported from. This edit is part of an effort of the Dutch community to keep building and address data updated.
Updating includes, but is not limited to adding new building and addresses, modifying existing building outlines  or deleting demolished houses.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-13 19:42:23+00:00): so there are no new object to replace the ones you deleted(buildings are demolished)?
de vries (2016-12-13 19:53:21+00:00): nope. here you can view the source: https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?geometry.x=143729.80371155&geometry.y=396584.78696443&zoomlevel=4
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-13 19:54:46+00:00): Thanks, continue your awesome effort :)
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:27:50+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
maraf24 (2016-12-14 14:19:34+00:00): Jak rozumiem, żadnych torów tramwajowych fizycznie nie ma.
Dlaczego więc stosujesz railway=tram?
shamai (2016-12-14 14:25:28+00:00): Zawiesiło mi się zapisywanie. Poprawiłm sekundą. Mój błąd
literan (2016-12-13 16:12:55+00:00): и зачем вы это сделали? https://www.facebook.com/golovabar
jn0 (2016-12-14 11:11:58+00:00): это просто неудачно вышло (из МАПС.МИ)
а так - https://www.facebook.com/pboroda/
он там действительно есть, новый кабак.
но вход со двора - левый нижний (юго-западный) угол "кубика" дома №15.
jn0 (2016-12-14 11:13:17+00:00): Упс, а там - "апдейт" получился???
jn0 (2016-12-14 11:19:50+00:00): Добавил теперь штатно, вроде как (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44394998)
literan (2016-12-14 13:15:16+00:00): Да, теперь все ок. Добавил craft_beer=yes. А как бар-то, стоит зайти? :)
jn0 (2016-12-14 18:19:40+00:00): мне понравилось, только с вешалками пока проблема :)
есть разный крафт (в т.ч. прикольная "хреновина" - с хреном) и типа London Pride, но не эль, а портер.
И что-то вроде лёффе фруктового...
user_5359 (2016-12-13 19:32:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-03 19:31:40+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
marc__marc (2022-06-16 13:09:44+00:00): Bonjour,
si vous êtes actifs, pourriez-vous corriger la valeur de club en en club=sport ? le fait d'être "boule de fort " est deja correctement renseigné oar la valeur boules=boule de fort 
Par ailleurs je me perd dans l'intéret de fusionner le batiment avec le club. et un club et ce qu'il utilise (batiment, terrain, ...) sont 2 choses différentes
Cordialement,
Marc
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
literan (2016-12-14 13:31:45+00:00): шлагбаум, ворота - это должны быть ТОЧКИ, входящие в линию дороги. А никакие не отрезки
DavidKewley (2016-12-13 18:24:12+00:00): Hi darius44, in this changeset you deleted County Road 4, which appears in Bing imagery to be a significant local highway. I'm wondering why you deleted it? Thanks, David
DavidKewley (2016-12-26 00:00:18+00:00): Hi darius44, please reply here. It looks like you deleted a significant road, and I think we should probably undo this change. Let us know what you think. Thanks, David
GOwin (2016-12-21 12:47:18+00:00): Robert, when adding POIs, make sure you use the appropriate tags for them. For example the POIs you tagged as outdoor shops are more likely to be convenience stores.
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-13 15:59:22+00:00): Pourquoi as tu suprimer des édifices?