piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DD1GJ (2022-04-01 07:20:02+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OSM.

Beachte bitte die Nutzungsbedingungen von Cellmapper und der Bundesnetzagentur. Diese sind inkompatibel zu OSM.

https://www.cellmapper.net/TOS

... you may not:  
use the materials for any commercial purpose, or for any public display (commercial or non-commercial) ... transfer the materials to another person or "mirror" the materials on any other server.

Für die EMF-Datenbank gibt es derzeit noch keine ausdrückliche Nutzungserlaubnis für OSM. 

Ich habe Deine Eintragungen daher rückgängig gemacht.
gscscnd (2022-02-24 20:20:07+00:00): Do opisu gatunku drzewa są np. tagi genus, species i taxon. Wartością tagu name nie powinna być sama nazwa gatunku. Zobacz <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree>.
archpdx (2022-02-24 15:54:13+00:00): 'Wide shoulders' should not be mapped as a foot path. If this road allows foot traffic, please add the proper access tags by selecting the road segment and clicking on the appropriate 'Foot' access tag under the 'Allowed Access' field
archpdx (2022-02-24 16:07:02+00:00): This changeset and others have been reverted in changeset 117818063
praeteritum (2022-07-10 05:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123419784.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-02-24 19:50:01+00:00): Hi Glanzone,

You created a second, smaller park inside Welton's Gorge Park - what is this supposed to represent?
praeteritum (2022-07-10 05:28:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123419781.
gendy54 (2022-04-23 21:00:44+00:00): Merci pour la modif. j'ai transféré les tags sur le nouveau CIS.
Par contre, pense à enlever les tags qui ne sont plus valables, car si c'est le CIS a déménagé, il ne doit plus avoir 
 au minimum le tag amenity=fire_station. Le changement de nom n'est pas suffisant ;)

Donat, alias gendy54
praeteritum (2022-07-10 05:25:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123419710.
Lee Carré (2022-02-25 00:22:21+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
RicoElectrico (2022-02-25 00:36:22+00:00): Well, the vandal did deface this whole area... and I blocked him ;)
Lee Carré (2022-02-25 11:26:24+00:00): Ah, OK. Fair enough. Objection withdrawn. Thanks for doing the cleanup.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 05:22:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123419709.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 05:22:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123419706.
eggie (2022-02-24 15:20:07+00:00): Dag  Genieteteree...
Geef svp aan wat je hebt veranderd. Dat kan in de commentaarregel bij upload. Ook bij Vespucci.
Mapse,
eggie
Kovoschiz (2022-02-26 09:06:10+00:00): Please don't attach other features to roads. This doesn't reflect reality, and makes editing difficult.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 05:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123419700.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 05:21:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123419688.
ma-rt-in (2022-02-27 07:35:20+00:00): Hallo,

stehen vor Ort tatsächlich Verkehrszeichen die Fußgänger und Radfahrer auf der Landstraße verbieten?

vg
eggie (2022-02-24 16:07:22+00:00): Beste Ferrie.. Wanneer je een fietspad gaat aanpassen, maar dat heeft negens meer verbindingen met de zijstraten zal het niet goed routeren.
Ik heb al wat aangepast.

Wel bord staat vooraan dit fietspad G11. G12a ?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-24 16:23:19+00:00): Routering hersteld...  

Kijk steeds of er zijverbindingen nodig zijn. Je zit anders gevangen op zo'n fietspad.
Gr eggie
gabro00 (2022-03-02 10:17:16+00:00): What is this E80 relation? route=road + public_transport seems suspicious.
emo_sami (2022-03-01 09:12:46+00:00): Hello rocky24;
I noticed you change the classification for "Al Khor Expressway" and didn't change the links associated with it.
Examples of ways need to upgrade the classification:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156001824/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156001828/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/743118004/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/898598079/history
Please review all links associated with these ways.
Regards
emo_sami
dropped (2022-03-01 15:31:46+00:00): Hi
Have made some further updates to correct this - thanks for letting me know
Changeset: 117984177

There is a further change needed to correct the road number to Q6 from Q1n which is no longer in use.  Im not familiar with JOSM so have been using ID editor and this might take a very long time to do.
emo_sami (2022-03-02 07:25:42+00:00): Hello rocky24;
Thank you for your response, and I will help you to update the links for these ways.
Regards
emo_sami
aprcargo (2022-02-24 16:20:11+00:00): Molave Garden Wet Market
praeteritum (2022-07-10 05:21:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123419680.
BCNorwich (2022-03-10 09:11:35+00:00): Way: 1034838897 looks like it goes through a wall to Frog Street. Is this actually a private garden path?
archpdx (2022-02-24 16:02:11+00:00): This reverts changesets 117815182, 117815260, 117815307, 117815382, 117815859, 117815953, 117816180, 117816275, 117816953
praeteritum (2022-07-10 05:15:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123419585.
SomeoneElse (2022-08-30 16:34:05+00:00): Likely Nunburnholme not Nun Monkton
Welshie (2022-08-30 16:48:13+00:00): You are right, I've renamed it to Nunburnholme/No 3 STW
and corrected the ref
praeteritum (2022-07-10 04:14:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123418922.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-26 09:30:51+00:00): Please don't add irrelevant names to grass and trees, or add them as `=shrub` randomly.
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2022-02-26 20:05:31+00:00): Hello, 
those roads you've added on T-junctions don't really exist. You shoudn't add a separate highway just because the junction doesn't have perfectly square corners. The convention is to only add a separate way if there is some kind of physical separation or atleast road markings which separate carrigeways.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 04:09:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123418826.
Dodko (2022-02-26 14:44:36+00:00): Prvá zmena je celkom dobrá.
Pridal som tam značku refitted=yes
je tam tuším rúra a vybetónované
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sk:Tag:refitted%3Dyes
Supaplex (2022-02-25 03:37:08+00:00): 應該用 waterway=waterfall 來做為主要標籤
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117819698
Cheng-Chi Feng (2022-02-25 09:31:18+00:00): OKAY,thx.
praeteritum (2022-07-10 04:04:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123418816.
user_5359 (2022-03-08 10:15:48+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034850055. What is the meaning of the tags
Abdon = Marques
Avenida = Francisco
?
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2022-03-08 20:11:06+00:00): this information should be in a name tag. I fixed it
DJérémy (2022-02-24 22:12:17+00:00): Sur le noeud 7091432441, il s’agit d’une caméra fixe avec 4 objectifs. Je me demandais s’il n’était pas plus approprié de mettre camera:type=fixed et camera:direction=0-360 ?
Poslovitch (2022-02-25 13:23:03+00:00): Je ne savais pas que ce genre de caméra existait, et il ressemble beaucoup à un dôme !
Peut-être qu'il faudrait lancer une discussion sur camera:type, mais "fixed" me paraît être la bonne valeur. Mais je suis moins convaincuu par camera:direction=0-360...
DJérémy (2022-02-25 17:09:35+00:00): Oui c'est vrai ils sont très similaires avec cette forme sphérique, sur le 6438741220 on a les 2 modèles sur le même mât, de mémoire le dome motorisé est en dessous de la fixe à 4 capteurs. Pour le camera:direction, en effet, il serait mieux de distinguer chaque capteur. Chacun rend sa propre image, il n'est pas question d'une vue panoramique. Peut être donc 0-90;90-180;180-270;270-0
SekeRob (2022-02-25 09:23:14+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM. In your very first change set on OSM, the comment is that you  have added a Villa 'mit' Apartmanen, but the edit set shows you also changed something on the relations of Hilejski poluotok (11089756, v7) &
Adriatic Sea (9350128, v646)
Latter now shows as a huge outline on the OSM Inpector map meaning there's something not right. Can you tell what you changed/added to those to cause this?

thanks
Facalderonm (2022-05-23 03:26:26+00:00): Hola. ¿Hay alguna razón para que esta vía haya sido marcada como terciaria? Es una vía de entrada a un club, por lo que no hay razón real para eso.
JuanMelo (2022-05-23 12:32:24+00:00): Buen día...
tiene razón... estaba mal
ya se ajustó
gracias
mueschel (2022-03-10 12:32:36+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what these objects are? The tags are not used in other places:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034856577
gscscnd (2022-02-24 20:16:10+00:00): Usunięcie numerów drzew raczej nie ułatwi ich rozróżnienia w terenie.
Bartek Dutkiewicz (2022-02-24 22:53:33+00:00): Tak, ale z numeracją drzew na Alei jest ogólnie problem i balagan. My robimy aktualnie ich inwentaryzację i numery nadajemy od nowa. Jak ją zakończymy, to uzupełnię numery i pozostałe dane tutaj. Dzięki za uwagi!
gscscnd (2022-02-25 12:38:55+00:00): OK, dziękuję za wyjaśnienie. Nie przyglądałem się tym drzewom w terenie na tyle, żeby zapamiętać czy mają jakieś numery. Drugi komentarz (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117815160#c825833) pozostaje aktualny.
Percherie (2023-06-18 13:12:38+00:00): Bonjour, tu semble très bien connaitre ce que tu a ajouté sur ce changeset. Plusieurs tag sont incomplet ou incorrecte.

Peut tu me décrire ce qu'il y a autour de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034862151
Il y a un générateur ? Qu'est-ce donc exactement ? Où se trouve la sous-station électrique ? L'armoire électrique du site ?

En te remerciant par avance
h5xw02byn31e (2023-06-19 21:38:26+00:00): Bonjour, le petit local à côté du portail, à l’extérieur du grillage (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034862152) est un poste de transformation Enedis.

L'élément à côté du grand batiment à l'interieur du grillage (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034862150) est un groupe électrogène.

Et le grand batiment (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379387712) est un site de regeneration fibre optique appartenant à SFR
bergaufsee (2022-02-24 23:04:53+00:00): Hallo,
darf ich fragen woraus du schließt Alt Brieselang in Falkensee zu verorten?
Ist die bauliche Anlage https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371497976 tatsächlich nicht mehr vorhanden?
tecmap15 (2022-02-25 19:23:09+00:00): Postalisch liegen die Adressen in Alt-Brieselang in Falkensee, auch wenn die Verwaltungsgrenzen anders liegen; siehe Geo-Portal Land BRB https://bb-viewer.geobasis-bb.de/?projection=EPSG:25833&center=365086.605,5831037.769&zoom=14&bglayer=1&layers=25,27
bergaufsee (2022-02-25 21:10:55+00:00): Das beantwortet meine Frage nicht, sondern ist scheinbar deine Meinung. Was ist deine Quelle? Wohnst du dort, kennst du jemanden der dort wohnt o.ä.? Wenn du der Meinung bist die Daten der LGB sind fehlerhaft sei doch bitte so gut und melde es dort zur Korrektur. Die aktuellen Verwaltungsgrenzen dort wurden auf meine Veranlassung vor Jahren angepasst, vlt. hast du ja aktuellere plausible Quellen die eine erneute Korrektur notwendig machen.
mavl (2022-02-25 08:47:46+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет несуществующие проезды.   
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034864856  
  
Нельзя проехать с улицы Сверлова на улицу Шоссейную.  
  
Также нельзя объехать магазин "Магнит" с улицы Свердлова и снова попасть на улицу Сверлова. Пожалуйста, проверьте ваши источники данных.
mavl (2022-02-25 08:53:39+00:00): Также пакет правок заменяет правильный адрес на неправильный.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229302936/history  
  
На здании табличка "149/1".
canfe (2022-02-26 17:49:25+00:00): way 1034864989 a me questo non sembra un building, ma un parcheggio.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117822032
chnav (2022-02-27 08:11:11+00:00): По-моему вы бежите впереди паровоза. Когда в канале будет вода - тогда и меняйте теги. А то влупили наличие воды на всём протяжении канала что не есть truth on the ground. Поведение юного первонаха.
chnav (2022-02-27 08:12:11+00:00): А уж комментарий к правке - так чистой воды разжигание. Ствдобища.
user_5359 (2022-02-24 20:22:25+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4717100678/history. What is the meaning of the key autor?
lalolan (2022-02-25 17:18:39+00:00): Hi, my mistake. I will fix it. Should be "artist_name". Thank you.
eggie (2022-02-24 20:59:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Elk begin is moeilijk. 
Dit is wat je hebt gedaan https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117823256

Het fietspad staat met access=no op slot. Mag hier niemand komen? 
Ook begrijp ik niet wat er niet doorgetrokken was. Ik kijk even of ik wat kan herstellen. 
Maak geen combinaties met access=no en andere tags. Op een fietspad hoeft geen bicycle=yes en motorvoertuigen routeren er per default niet. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-24 21:08:28+00:00): reverted by changeset 117827792

Wat was hier het probleem? 
Met de revert is ook de brug hersteld. 
Wat was dan je bedoeling hier?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-24 21:18:35+00:00): construction=cycleway heb ik nog verwijderd hier. Dat stond er nog van de aanleg van het fietspad. Straatnaam toegevoegd.
Nielkrokodil (2022-03-01 20:11:59+00:00): Liebe:r Jorisbo,

ich verstehe dein Anliegen, den Wert vehicle nicht zur Beschreibung des Fahrzeugs zu verwenden, weil es auch für Access verwendet wird. Ich denke zwar, dass es hier nie ein Problem mit diesem Wert gegeben hätte, aber wer weiß.

Der von dir genutzte "type" ist aber finde ich noch schlechter. Es geht Information verloren, und type soll laut wiki nur auf Relationen angewendet werden.  

Ich werde es nun ändern auf vehicle:type.
Jorisbo (2022-03-02 09:30:52+00:00): Hallo Nielkrokodil ! Danke für deine aufmerksamkeit und die verbesserung. Vielen grussen Joris
Nakaner (2022-02-25 09:40:28+00:00): Hallo cyton,

danke, dass du die Änderungen von RomanDug (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105921007) ausgegraben hast. Dessen Beiträge sind, nachdem ein paar angeschaut habe, mangelhaft.

Gehst du die Beiträge von ihm aus dieser Zeit jetzt systematisch durch oder suchst du mit anderen Mitteln nach seltsamen Änderungen?

Angesichts des einfach dämlichen Fehlers, dass jeder Straßenname auf Straße zu enden habe, habe ich den Eindruck, dass RomanDug ohne Kenntnisse von Ort oder Kultur systematisch Websites abgeklappert hat und die Daten ohne weitere Prüfung in OSM übertragen hat. Wer so arbeitet, schreibt nicht nur Straßennamen falsch, sondern schmuggelt auch noch weitere Eastereggs in OSM.

Der Sinn und Zweck von OSM ist es nicht, eine halbautomatisch erstellte Kopie fremder Datenbanken zu sein, sondern dass die von Ortskundigen erhoben werden. Daher wäre es sinnvoll, nicht die Beiträge von RomanDug manuell zu korrigieren, sondern systematisch all seine Beiträge aus diesem Zeitraum, die im Rahmen der MapRoulette-Challenge entstanden sind, rückgängig zu machen.

Es mag hart klingen, systematisch die Arbeit mehrerer Tage eines anderen Mappers in den Müll zu werfen. Leider tut man mit solchen Schein-Verbesserungen dem OSM-Projekt längerfristig keinen Gefallen. Unser Grundsatz in OSM in Deutschland ist Qualität statt Quantität.

Falls du schon die gesamten Änderungen von RomanDug gesichtet hast, wäre der Revert nicht mehr nötig. Aber vielleicht willst du dir die Arbeit nicht machen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
cyton (2022-02-25 09:56:44+00:00): Nein, ich hab mir mal die erwähnte seite der wochenaufgabe angesehen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Schwerpunkt_der_Woche#woche_70
Und da hab ich halt auch was von romandug gesehen.
Aber ich könnte mal schauen was der so in berlin/deutschland verzapft hat.
cyton (2022-02-25 12:07:25+00:00): ich hab mir mal über overpass-turbo die sachen stichprobenhaft angesehen grad wo er zuletzt dran war, das scheint aber meistens nur eine email und oder öffnungszeiten zu sein, die poi scheinen alle schon eine adresse gehabt zu haben vorher
VigilantPenguin (2022-02-24 19:15:20+00:00): Specific sections of track are likely not named after the service(s) running on them and should most likely be changed to reflect this. However it is not clear to me at this time how Sound Transit refers to a particular section of track, so where tracks have names I simply updated them to reflect the publicized naming convention (X Line).
Kovoschiz (2022-02-25 11:18:22+00:00): 1. Please don't add names not of the woodland to it. Use `place=locality`. 
2. Don't add descriptive labels such as "former site". Put them in `description:zh=`.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-25 11:20:07+00:00): 3. Please don't attach other features on roads. This doesn't reflect reality, and makes editing difficult.
SomeoneElse (2022-08-30 17:00:02+00:00): Nun Monkton not Notton
Welshie (2022-08-30 17:24:19+00:00): corrected name and ref, thanks
MxxCon (2022-02-24 21:08:20+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you remove these tags?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117825226
SBM3 (2022-02-24 21:16:32+00:00): Hi, the tags are forcing trips we build on this route to take exit 12 as opposed to stay on route 9A.
MxxCon (2022-02-24 21:32:17+00:00): We?
If these tags are not outright wrong and accurately represent relevant data, isn't this an issue with whatever software you use to build those trips?
It seems like you are doing this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117825226
Emilius123 (2022-02-24 21:50:37+00:00): Not exactly tagging for the renderer, rather tagging for data consumers?
MxxCon (2022-02-24 21:55:14+00:00): As the linked article states: "The phrase usually refers to renderers, but it also applies for routing and geocoding and other uses of the data."
SBM3 (2022-02-24 22:56:49+00:00): destination:lanes: none|none|none|General Grant National Memorial;Mount Sinai St. Luke's Hospital;West 125th Street

turn:lanes: none|none|none|slight_right

Having "none" in the above tags were causing the issue. What are the alternatives?
SomeoneElse (2022-02-24 23:02:53+00:00): Hello,
Who is the "we" in " trips we build on this route"?
Best Regards,
Andy
SBM3 (2022-02-24 23:28:41+00:00): My friend and me.
MxxCon (2022-02-25 02:13:36+00:00): destination:lanes and turn:lanes with "none" in them is a standard and documented way to tag lanes as can be observed in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination
If such tags cause problems in your routing software, you'd need to fix your routing software rather than start deleting tags all over the world.
I'm going to revert this edit.
BCNorwich (2022-03-10 07:47:15+00:00): Hi, you dragged several nodes quite a way of position making several self-intersections of area outlines. I think I've corrected them all. Please check before uploading.

Regards Bernard.
Marek-M (2022-02-24 20:32:43+00:00): Cześć, nie da się jakoś skrócić tej nazwy w name a opis przerzucić np. do description?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117825981
Sigridstorrada (2022-02-25 19:06:51+00:00): Masz rację, wycięłam ten długi ogonek. Pozdrawiam.
user_5359 (2022-02-24 20:20:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Sorry I can see your object on the mentioned aerial image. Have also a look on the writing of the keys. Please use name instead of Name.
mackerski (2022-06-29 21:49:01+00:00): What was the source for this mapping? I've already updated the tagging to reflect the fact that no construction has begun, but I'm concerned that the source may be a copyrighted map.
avinet_ua (2022-06-18 07:54:02+00:00): -
LucGommans (2023-09-25 15:37:43+00:00): Hi! You added access=permit to this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4904045471 which has Kundenparkplatz in the name. Should this not be access=customer, or do you need to request a permit ahead of your arrival to be able to drive in?

Thanks!
Luc
andrewsuzuki (2023-02-18 23:38:38+00:00): Hi, I saw you added separate highway=cycleway ways along 25A but it's really reserved for cycle tracks (rather than bike lanes), and with physical separation from the roadway. See the wiki pages "Bicycle" and "highway=cycleway". I'd suggest it returns to the previous tagging with cycleway=lane or cycleway:right=lane on the road
jbrakomccomb (2023-04-17 03:05:35+00:00): Hi, I have begun to make these changes on several roads across Suffolk County. Will eventually make everything correct.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
Cucazer (2022-02-26 23:09:52+00:00): Please do not use objects to mark map issues. Remember that this map represents real world and each object should exist in reality. You can just leave a note (dialog bubble with plus sign button) instead, so experienced mappers can correctly implement the fix.
Also please abstain from argumenting your changesets using Google Maps. OpenStreetMap is an open-source project, which is different than license terms of Google Maps. As a consequence, no data from Google Maps should be copypasted here (I believe, this was not the case here, consider it just a gentle warning).

I generally advise you to go through some tutorials on iD before further editing to get better understanding of what are you dealing with. Nevertheless OpenStreetMap appreciates all contributions (especially from locals) that help to make this map better!
Руслан Мамедов (2022-02-27 07:50:31+00:00): Thank you very much for your advice, I will try to follow it in the future.
ZLima12 (2022-03-26 03:39:40+00:00): Great job! If you could split up your changesets slightly, it would be easier to review. Maybe do the yard in one changeset and the line in the other? Either way, not a big deal, changeset looks good to me.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117827885
ElliottPlack (2022-06-07 13:11:10+00:00): Hi there, when mapping sidewalks/crosswalks please add the surface while you're working on it. It only takes a second. It helps out the data.
Joseph R P (2022-06-08 19:57:03+00:00): Alright, thanks for letting me know. I'll consider that next time I'm on my sidewalk/cycle path mapping spree.
ElliottPlack (2022-06-08 20:13:21+00:00): Great! It is helpful, and it shows up on the main map.
user_11435438 (2022-03-01 12:49:55+00:00): 大佬，膜您
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117828554
user_12531033 (2022-03-01 12:57:43+00:00): 我把能补的都补上了，快夸我！
abakus_uploader (2022-02-24 23:31:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!