piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mcld (2017-04-10 21:11:36+00:00): (Also, are you sure they're the same place?)
Uysie Oosthuizen (2017-04-11 09:05:08+00:00): Hey - You are completely correct. To asnwer your first question, I added "Isington Assembly Hall" as the Afrikaans alternative while on my mobile and wasn't aware I can add it by using the "alt_name" tag.

In regards to your second question, yes they are definitely the same place. I had massive trouble finding the Islington Assembly Hall to go and see a show, only to find that it is infact hidden away in the Southwest corner of the town hall complex. 

Was just trying to help future travelers out... Hope that clarify things.
mcld (2017-04-11 17:38:30+00:00): Thanks. I think they're not quite the same place but they're both part of the same building? If so, then I'd suggest you actually add the Assembly Hall as a separate node inside the town hall. That has advantages: you can specify totally different properties for the two things (e.g. phone number). But at minimum, I hope you don't mind fixing the name issue. Cheers.
mcld (2017-04-30 20:35:25+00:00): Hi - could you please fix the "Afrikaans" naming on this object? It does need fixing.
joost schouppe (2017-03-23 09:39:01+00:00): Waarom zou je dit als universiteit taggen? Het is toch gewoon een secundaire school?
In OSM is het ook de bedoeling om één ding maar één keer te mappen. Aangezien het schooldomein is al als school gemapped, dus hoef je aan het gebouw geen extra info meer te hangen. Enkel het gebouw zelf, eventueel als "schoolgebouw" en eventueel adresinfo (als het gebouw maar één adres heeft) is voldoende.
Glenn Plas (2017-04-10 10:06:47+00:00): nice catch.  tx
gpstracks (2017-03-22 19:06:58+00:00): Questo non è un rifugio gestito, così come ache altri che lei sta modificando in questo senso. 

La prego gentilmente di correggere questo  edit.
Ho notato che sta togliendo il nome "Rifugio" di nodi tipo "alpine_hut" e simili.
Devo chiedere gentilmente di revertare questi edit poichè sono errati,
Grazie
Marco Barbieri70 (2017-03-22 19:33:38+00:00): Grazie a lei. Provvedo a correggere gli errori che ho fatto sui rifugi gestiti/non gestiti.
Per quanto riguarda il nome mi sto informando in mailing list se è opportuno o meno tenere esplicitare il nome Rifugio nel tag name, quando l'informazione che si tratti di un rifugio è nel tag tourism=alpine_hut.
Ma credo già che abbia ragione lei. Appena ho conferma, provvederò a ripristinare i nomi corretti.
will_p (2017-03-23 18:13:44+00:00): Hi Stan,

Last week I commented on a bridleway you added north of Kegworth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46882223). I received no response from you, and at the weekend I decided to survey it on the ground, because your remote mapping was clearly approximate and rather confusing in the way it overlapped other features. Since I uploaded my survey, I see you have made more changes. I have some concerns about this -

1. You have changed a section of the designated route east of 'Cedar Isle' from track to bridleway. I don't think this is correct, because it certainly looked to me like it was used by agricultural vehicles and therefore should correctly be tagged as a track.

2. In making the above change you deleted the way and recreated it. In doing so you have removed valid tags: specifically, designation and surface tags.

3. You have extended the way tagged with highway=bridleway so that it overlaps the adjoining service road (driveway). Ways should not be placed on top of each other in this way. For one thing, it will cause problems with routing.

I don't doubt these changes were made in good faith, but please do be careful not to delete valid information, particularly information someone has taken the time to collect on the ground. Also, when changing something someone has just added, it is always helpful to provide a descriptive changeset comment explaining why. 

I'm inclined to revert these changes, but will wait a couple of days in case you wish to comment first.

Regards,
Will (will_p)
Stan W (2017-03-23 21:09:49+00:00): Hi Will,

Apologies for not responding - I am not familiar with the concept of discussions.

While I was relying on second-hand information from one of my team of surveyors who walked the route, this does raise an issue in my mind as to the purpose of including routes on OpenStreetMap.

If we just show the physical characteristics of a track or drive, there is no indication of whether the public can use it or not - my terminology of bridleway indicates that the public have a right to use it, and can therefore plan a route along it without fear of challenge.

Apologies for inadvertently deleting additional data - if you feel that it should revert, please go ahead.

Regards
Stan
will_p (2017-03-24 11:34:40+00:00): Hi Stan,

There has been a lot of discussion in the past about tagging rights of way and the general consensus is that the highway tag should only be used to indicate physical characteristics and not access rules. There are separate tags available for tagging access (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access). Although for rights of way in England and Wales the most important tag to use is designation (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation), which is the only unambiguous way to indicate that a right of way exists.

I do understand you wishing to see rights of way shown on the main map rendering at http://www.openstreetmap.org/. The problem is that rendering is intended for use worldwide and a deliberate decision has been made not to show country specific access rules.

It is important not to think of OSM as just a single map. The idea is that the data should be usable to create a wide variety of different maps. There is a good chance that eventually a general purpose UK specific rendering will become available. 
Here is an example that exists at the moment - 
https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=16&lat=52.85252&lon=-1.27637
- but note that this is on a mapper's personal site and probably isn't intended to handle lots of traffic.

It is worth considering adding designation tags to the rights of way you are adding, because this is the tag that any future renderings will probably use.

Regards,
Will
SomeoneElse (2017-03-24 16:00:09+00:00): Hi Stan, hi Will - for info https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html is on a server in Germany now, and should be able to cope with people viewing maps there (though tile scrapers would be a problem).
Best Regards,
Andy
SK53 (2017-03-24 16:17:07+00:00): Hi Stan,

A couple of blog posts about footpath mapping & assessing completeness of PRoW information are: https://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/10-years-of-footpath-mapping-for.html and https://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/looking-for-footpaths-in-hickling-notts.html might help build the picture.
nyuriks (2017-03-23 04:59:26+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding wikipedia tag. Please use "add field" (dropdown) instead of adding tags directly. It will automatically add wikidata tag too. Thanks!
kreuzschnabel (2018-11-19 21:19:51+00:00): Bitte gelegentlich mal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name lesen. „Elbbachhalle“ ist ein Eigenname, also in Ordnung, aber „Kindergarten“ oder „Feuerwehr“ mit Sicherheit nicht :) ich nehm die mal raus.
naoliv (2017-03-23 03:45:16+00:00): Jéssica, estradas municipais e ruas residencias, por exemplo, que não são pavimentadas, não devem ser representadas como "track".
"track" é apenas para trilhas agrícolas.
Utilize "surface=unpaved" junto com o tipo da via (residential, unclassified, tertiary)
literan (2017-09-17 22:05:20+00:00): а велополосу не открыли часом к Дню города?
trolleway (2017-09-18 09:01:17+00:00): я сам там давно не был, в жж читал что вроде открыли всё кроме Рождественского бульвара, там длительные раскопки
trolleway (2017-09-18 09:01:38+00:00): сам я рисовать это не буду, потому что не уверен, надо самому посмотреть
ddavmac (2017-03-22 19:22:41+00:00): Correcto, muchas gracias.
Khalil Laleh (2017-03-23 02:46:39+00:00): دوست عزیز در این چنجست 283 نود حذف شده است.
لطفا توضیحی در مورد چنجست بفرمایید.
hamid-aha (2017-03-23 19:04:20+00:00):  اینها همه پوینت های بدون نام بوده است
Khalil Laleh (2017-03-23 19:58:16+00:00): معمولا افرادی که با تصاویر ماهواره ای نقشه رسم میکنند، مسیرها و پوینتها رو بدون نام ثبت میکنند.
بینام بودن دلیل بر اشتباه بودن نیست.
لطفا در صورتیکه دلیل دیگری نداشته باشید، این پوینتها رو ریورت کنید.
اگر مشکلی داشته باشید، اینکارو من میتونم انجام بدم.
hamid-aha (2017-03-24 06:08:43+00:00): عذرخواهی میکنم من از این مورد اطلاعی نداشتم. اگر امکان دارد شما زحمتش رو بکشید . سپاسگذارم
Khalil Laleh (2017-03-24 11:22:21+00:00): برحسب اتفاق نودهایی که شما حذف کردید از چنجست اشتباهی بود که یکی از کاربران غیرعمدی اونها رو وارد نقشه کرده بود و خودش هم به دنبال حذف این چنجستها بود.
hamid-aha (2017-03-24 11:38:14+00:00): بسیار عالی ...
eggie (2017-03-22 23:00:04+00:00): Revert due to vandalism
eggie (2017-03-22 23:20:59+00:00): Beste dkt2.. Een park is iets anders dan een parking. De parking was al keurig gemapt hier. Je legt er een park overheen aan met de naam parking.
Er zijn je al eerder vragen gesteld over wat je aan het doen ben, maar je hebt geen antwoord daarop gegeven. Je brengt schade toe aan de kaart. 
De vraag is nu om even te stoppen met editen en eerst te reageren.
Ok het voetpad dat je aanlegt bestaat helemaal niet in deze vorm. 
Wat is de bedoeling van deze edits?
Graag een reactie... 
MVG,
Eggie
jmsbert (2018-06-29 19:22:43+00:00): Hi,
just recognized the pub "Bunker" you added in 2017 at Overbergstraße, 49661 Cloppenburg. I am wordering if this location really exists and if it is a public place. If it is private i would suggest to replace it by a simple building and add an adress if available...
jmsbert (2018-07-15 14:59:21+00:00): Since I got no answer, I decided to add "disused"-tags to this amenity. Thus it is possible to reveal the information if neccesary...
nyuriks (2017-03-23 05:03:49+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding wikipedia tag. Please install "wikipedia" plugin, and use "fetch wikidata IDs" too - it will add both wikipedia and wikidata tags for you. Thanks!
sebastic (2017-03-23 07:13:21+00:00): I only moved the tags from the outer ways to the relations. The wikipedia tag was already present on the outer way.
poornibadrinath (2017-03-22 20:12:21+00:00): This revert is still not complete. There are several other changesets that caused this change. Looking into all of them and see where it broke the route relation. Until then, if this changeset appears to have broken something or generally appears bad, please wait or comment on this changeset before taking any further actions. Thanks!
poornibadrinath (2017-03-22 21:38:27+00:00): Fixed here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47079819
mxrev8 (2017-04-03 09:46:32+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-23 08:17:47+00:00): Reverted some fantasy "bridges".
Upendrakarukonda (2017-03-23 10:18:57+00:00): Hello Queenducky21,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. In https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106192792/history you changed the name of the building from Potomac Yard Fire Station to residential. Could you mention the reason please?

Regards,

Upendra.
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-23 06:35:30+00:00): Reverting natural=wood back to landuse=forest
utack (2017-03-24 17:19:09+00:00): So there is really a shelter here, in the middle of the field?
BeKri (2017-03-24 18:37:58+00:00): Nop, def. not ...
mxrev8 (2017-04-03 09:46:10+00:00): OSM is not a place for stalkers and bullies like dgitto. dgitto must stop stalking and sistematically reversing and deleting edits of singled out contributors. the tag "name" (Common name) means the name normally used by the general public in everyday life. it cannot be used to describe things. for long bureacratic names use the tag "official name" and for other descriptions use other tags like the tag "description"  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions. dgitto reversed a perfectly legitimate editi just for the purpose of stalking and bullying. stalking and bullying is a crime in real life and it is punished by the law with restraining orders and prison time. OSM administrators must not allow the stalking of bullying of dgitto  https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dgitto/history
tux67 (2017-03-24 20:56:57+00:00): Hallo micshow, 
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithilfst die Kartendaten zu verbessern. 
Einige Anmerkungen zu deinem Änderungssatz: 
Für das Vereinsheim reicht der Name nicht aus. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben

Community Centre wäre wohl passend:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden: 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14 
Gruß 
Stephan (tux67)
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf 
Wichtig auch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
Fa7C0N (2017-03-23 07:26:36+00:00): Hi  khbritish,

I found that you have deleted a POI in this changeset can you please verify that? Because there is a note saying the name of exact POI you deleted.

Thank you.
Fa7C0N
canfe (2019-03-08 07:06:55+00:00): Mi sono imbattuto per caso (più o meno, perché son della zona e scorrazzo sulle mappe dei paesi a me vicini) in molti alberi vicini mappati.
Secondo me sarebbe meglio identificarli come "filare di alberi" (c'è l'opzione) a meno che non siano per importanza, portamento, rarità o fatti storici, degni di nota ciascuno.

Ferruccio
Fa7C0N (2017-03-23 07:12:53+00:00): Hi lk07,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I found that you are adding natural = marsh tags to a lot of water bodies in this region. can you please check this [link]("https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dmarsh") and tag. because the schema you are using looks like deprecated.

Thank you
Fa7C0N
j03lar50n (2017-03-22 21:37:02+00:00): I would suggest changing the road type and possibly only removing the name tag, instead of deleting the entire feature. Having driveways included in the road network can assist with routing.
srividya_c (2017-03-23 06:53:19+00:00): @zhackney and @ j03lar50n
I have reverted the changeset at #47087298 changeset. 

@zhackney do improve the existing highways and not delete them if it exists in imagery.
SomeoneElse (2017-03-23 16:29:40+00:00): The website that you added suggests that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/715633050/history is shut...
eggie (2017-03-22 22:42:08+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-22 22:46:36+00:00): Even wat verbeterd. amenity=restaurant en name= .... aangepast. Staat nu ook op adresnode.
restaurant-= gate of.... was niet goed getagd. Zie de wiki hierboven hoe te taggen.
BCNorwich (2017-03-23 06:53:52+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to point out a couple of things.
I wonder if "Sutcliffe Park Walkway" is a proper name given to all of the footpaths and if this is verifiable on the ground? (Please see :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability).
Secondly there is no provision of bridging or fords where the paths cross water features.
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2017-03-23 07:03:59+00:00): Hi, there are now several area named "Kidbrooke Village". I doubt if this large area is one apartment build, rather it could be several buildings. From the quoted website "Kidbrooke Village" is a name given to the whole area.
Regards Bernard
eggie (2017-03-22 22:49:46+00:00): Is het werkelijk name=de kapper ?
eggie (2017-03-22 22:53:26+00:00): klopt.. 'k heb website en Phone toegevoegd
GerdP (2017-08-29 05:35:20+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=footpath
on all three ways in this changeset.
Did you mean path or footway?
poornibadrinath (2017-03-22 21:35:28+00:00): Hi. I have fixed the changes from the above mentioned changeset 45468393 to remove the unwanted oneways and duplicated tertiary links added. I have made sure to check the relations and maintain them as I edit the roads to retrieve back the data. If in case any relation is broken due to the fixes, please let me know :) Thanks! 
Poornima
user_5359 (2017-03-26 07:54:38+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Du hast verschiedene Wege über den Ansbach eingezeichnet (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482091229 ) ohne dass Du verzeichnet hast, ob eine Brücke, ein kleine Tunnelröhre oder ein Furt ist. Könntest Du das entsprechend nachtragen?

Wenn Du Hilfe brauchst: Du bist jederzeit willkommen mit Deinen Fragen.
Mapeiro (2017-03-23 00:23:20+00:00): Acho que são todos alunos dela:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Liliana%20Osako
PlaneMad (2017-03-24 06:21:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Nice edits! Some of the names needs better capitalization bird pond -> Bird Pond.
Aleks-Berlin (2017-03-23 08:50:55+00:00): Hi O., please use key="email" not "@". Thanks, Alex
poornibadrinath (2017-03-22 21:47:23+00:00): Also deleting the tag service=parking_aisle because the roads were for a fuel station.
michalfabik (2017-03-26 09:00:04+00:00): Pozdrav, tag name:en služi za upisivanje opšte prihvaćenog engleskog naziva objekta, ako takvo ime postoji, ne za vaš izmišljeni prevod ili bilo koju dodatnu informaciju na engleskom jeziku. Na primjer, ako je name "Ambasada Bosne i Hercegovine", onda će name:en sigurno biti "Embassy of Bosnia and Herzegovina", jer to je naziv pod kojim ta institucija sama sebe predstavlja na engleskom. Ali ako se kladionica zove "Bobana", engleski naziv sigurno nije "PlanetWin365". Takođe, website "http://planetvin365.com" koji ste postavili ne radi. Ako ste mislili napisati "http://planetwin365.com", to je opet website neke međunarodne kompanije koja nema nikakve veze sa ovom kladionicom.
ToeBee (2017-04-25 04:40:06+00:00): Given your other removal of a path in this area, I am also questioning this one. I see a couple of GPS traces along it. Do you personally know this area? I will restore this path as well for now. Please chime in if you really have first hand knowledge that it should be removed.
PlaneMad (2017-03-24 06:29:19+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM. Nice work on buildings, if you can correct any overlapping buildings that would be great!
aceman444 (2020-08-01 19:31:04+00:00): Zdravim, preklad toho korejskeho nazvu v Trnave je podla prekladaca "hotel", takze to mozno vobec atm nebude. Tento pouzivatel zvykne davat nezmyselne typy objektov (napr. viewpoint) a do name:ko napise co to vlastne je. Maps.me ...
Jose Riha (2020-08-01 20:28:05+00:00): dakujem, aspon uz nie je aktivny..
aceman444 (2020-08-01 21:02:58+00:00): Vacsinu bodov mu uz ini pomazali, ja som teraz presiel tie co mal na Slovensku a ked sa dalo z toho prekladu nieco pouzit tak som to poopravoval. Len tento 'atm' som este nechal, ak viete zistit aky by tam mohol byt hotel, tak to pripadne opravte. Dakujem
PlaneMad (2017-03-24 06:39:07+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Many of the buildings don't line up very well with the imagery, can you please check this again?
manoharuss (2017-03-24 06:40:23+00:00): Hi DaveHath,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. Nice job here on building mapping. If you can fix the building overlapping issues here, that would be great.

Thanks,

Manohar
manoharuss (2017-03-24 06:42:07+00:00): Hi EmGee0430,

Nice job on building mapping here. If you can correct the overlapping buildings here that would be great.

Thanks,

Manohar
aharvey (2020-04-03 07:00:18+00:00): The Cowan Track is signposted as walkers only so I've removed your mtb route relation.
Warin61 (2020-04-03 07:53:07+00:00): Arrr ... memory is gone on this, sorry. Possible that I had the walker/runners up with strava.. or that the bicycle strava was illegal? Or it could have changed over the time.
aharvey (2020-04-03 09:23:48+00:00): reading some forums seems like plenty of people just ignored the sign and ride here anyway, but also looks like it's within the last few years it changed. Either way I've updated it now, but we should try and check some of the other ones you've added here.
Warin61 (2020-04-03 22:18:42+00:00): For checking the National parks website could be used as confirmation? 
Centre Trail https://www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au/things-to-do/cycling-trails/centre-trail

There are also the MTB sites.. this among them
http://nswmtb.asn.au/node/2970
Warin61 (2020-04-03 22:28:01+00:00): Oh... just a moment...
http://nobmob.com/files/imagecache/preview/files/forum_images/2011/09/MTB_tracks_in_KCNP.jpg

Think the walkers only sign is well out of date? Might be worth a phone call to the rangers... if they are in the office with this virus around.
Warin61 (2020-04-10 05:29:37+00:00): I have emailed NP about this .. see what happens.
Spanholz (2017-03-28 08:06:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

I saw you added a footway north of the middle/high school. It's not connected to any other way. So it will not be used for routing etc. Maybe connect it or delete it. Residential roads imply sidewalks in my eyes.
GerdP (2017-08-25 11:39:07+00:00): Hi!
I've noticed that you often use the tag highway=pathway instead of highway=path
Is that intended?
GerdP (2017-08-30 09:58:18+00:00): I've now changed them to path, please check
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51570587
nyuriks (2017-03-23 05:01:20+00:00): Hi, please use "add field" when adding wikipedia tag (from dropdown). This way it will automatically add wikidata tag too. Thanks!
manoharuss (2017-03-24 07:54:15+00:00): Hi Love Toys Ctg,

The correct tag for sex shops is shop=erotic. I corrected your edit. Can you confirm the name of the places here? if they are correct.

Thanks

Manohar
manoharuss (2017-03-24 07:17:37+00:00): Hi asdunn,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. For buildings instead of area=yes, building=yes is the right tag. It would be great if you can correct.

Thanks,

Manohar
Upendrakarukonda (2017-03-24 07:40:14+00:00): Hello  kellyjfernandez,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Can you realign the buildings you traced? You added many crossing buildings. For better mapping you can refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page happy to help.

Best,

Upendra.
nyuriks (2017-03-23 04:52:29+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding wikipedia tags. When you add them, do you use "tags" or "fields"?  Because if you add "wikipedia" __field__ (from the dropdown), it will automatically add wikidata as well. Thanks!
wolfgang8741 (2017-03-23 04:54:49+00:00): Yes, I'm using the dropdown wikipedia field to get the wikidata association as well.
nyuriks (2017-03-23 06:00:03+00:00): Strange, this edit only added wikipedia tag: http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=47082371