piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trigeo (2020-08-03 17:54:00+00:00): Hi Joseph E, 

Thanks for your feedback, It seemed Bing imagery was showing evidence of a bridge and seemed to be newest available here. 

Regards, 
trigeo
Joseph E (2020-08-03 21:26:43+00:00): Currently there are construction materials and equipment visible in Bing (and Maxar and ESRI)  imagery, but no bridge structure. Perhaps it is still under construction?
trigeo (2020-08-04 16:02:03+00:00): It could be, I can add construction=yes if that works, until we can know for sure it’s complete?
Joseph E (2020-08-05 22:55:11+00:00): Good idea, I've done this now.
aceman444 (2020-11-16 01:32:00+00:00): Zdravim, nespajajte nahodne cesty do jednej (v tomto pripade zapadnu,juznu a vychodnu vetvu Radnicneho namestia), ked po nich vedu relacie (tu cyklotrasa https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2733343). Editor iD je v tomto extra zly, tak mozno ste si to ani nevsimli, ze tam ta trasa je. Tak kym pouzivate tento editor, radsej takto nespajajte cesty.
aceman444 (2020-11-16 01:42:35+00:00): Chcel som povedat, ze relacia prichadzala z Vcelarskej, isla po juznej casti Radnicneho namesia a odchadzala na Strukovu. Tym, ze ste spojili tie tri vetvy Radnicneho namestia do jednej cesty, dostalo sa cele toto V do relacie a takato cyklotrasa uz nedavala zmysel.
Illio (2020-11-17 21:41:41+00:00): Tak to sa ospravedlňujem, to sa mi muselo stať niekedy vtedy, keď ste trvali na tom, že Radničné námestie sa volá "Radničné nám." :)
aceman444 (2020-11-19 19:46:40+00:00): Hej :)
marc__marc (2024-08-18 00:25:48+00:00): Hello,
why did you add treet with ref from Paris, France ? none of those tress are in Paris
Regards,
Marc
eggie (2020-05-05 19:48:53+00:00): Oke  Oliver. tracktype=grade1 is inderdaad asphalt. Wel is het zo dat tracktype de specificatie is van highway=track en je hebt er een highway=unclassified van gemaakt.
Het klopt dus nog niet helemaal. 
Of highway=track met tracktype=  of gewoon highway=unclassified , maar zonder tracktype.
MVG,
Eggie
Oliver Piper (2020-05-06 06:08:25+00:00): Dan zou het nu goed moeten zijn, nadat ik het tracktype heb verwijderd.
Bedankt voor de hulp!
Groetjes, Oliver.
Frans S (2020-05-06 12:42:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
A question. Did you join the slack channel Crow2map Tanzania? There are specific guidelines how and what to map. You can request for a review which will be done by experienced validators
See this link
https://join.slack.com/t/crowd2map/shared_invite/zt-dhhcwlkg-ROTlhoST1Rsz9Edhm67hsw

About your mappings here. 
These are not in line with the guidelines of the Crowd2map Tanzania team. 
We will review and correct your work
Best regards
cc @sab27
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84714909
4004 (2020-05-09 23:25:44+00:00): I dunno, it's supposed to link H6038 and Bahushevicha, which are both secondaries
berms (2020-05-12 15:23:33+00:00): Hi 4004, thank you for the message. I changed the ways back to secondary.
5m4u9 (2020-05-07 07:24:14+00:00): hola, lamentablemente revertí este cambio porque cambia el limite de los macrodistritos... por favor ocultar los boundaries antes de editar en la próxima :)
BCNorwich (2020-05-06 07:06:43+00:00): Hello Phil, 

You made a duplication at the west end between gate an footpath junction. I've amended this so it's OK now.

For the driveway Way: 30635767 access=no can't be correct else how is Lake Lodge accessed, I changed it to access=private. 

At the gate to the east end, tagged just barrier=gate does not allow for any access at all! This must at least be access=private, which I've added. However I cannot determine how the designated foot accesses the gate. Do pedestrians pass through the gate? Or is there a separate gate or even a gap for pedestrian access PRoW?

Regards Bernard.
PhilAck (2020-05-06 16:40:24+00:00): Hi Bernard. Yep the pedestrians go to one side of the gate. I put the gate as allowing pedestrians.
BCNorwich (2020-05-06 07:11:48+00:00): Added website from above comment and address to the POI.
jleedev (2022-01-04 02:09:48+00:00): What's the meaning of this?
elgolfo (2020-05-06 14:52:46+00:00): Hallo ickehgw, 
ich habe mir dein Changeset angeschaut, weil du "review requested" markiert hast. Es sieht gut aus.
Zwei kleine Anmerkungen: du könntest noch smoothness=* (Wegbeschaffenheit) angeben, das wird von Router ausgewertet und ist für Radfahrer interessant. surface=* könntest du noch spezifieren, vielleicht mit ground, fine_gravel oder compacted.

Viele Grüße
Moritz
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84716078
SHARCRASH (2020-05-12 11:21:23+00:00): Hello! What are your sources for ahaving reactivated this way? Did you really found and take that track? I really doubt, i have been there recently, the path suggested on outdated maps is actually a depression which may have been taken long time ago but not anymore because of vegetation, fallen trees and other unstable elements.
kxzav (2020-05-12 15:28:41+00:00): Hi. You're absolutely right, that was a mistake on my side. I drove past it some time ago and the eastern as well as the western entrances seemed reasonably free. Today I checked it and the middle is indeed obstructed by multiple fallen trees. Thanks for the comment!
SHARCRASH (2020-05-12 15:40:03+00:00): Thanks for your quick response and confirmation! One can maybe miss something as sometimes the trails are faint. But honestly the other trail is already great and far enough for fun hiking or mountain biking.

U said "drove", do you mountain bike?
SHARCRASH (2020-05-12 15:40:32+00:00): By the way, i'm going to update the changes myself.
kxzav (2020-05-12 16:24:43+00:00): Yes, I drove my mountain bike down there and since the adjacent trail is pretty steep and somebody built some ramps, I was more  focused on not crashing than on observing the trail in question here. I think that caused the error :)
SHARCRASH (2020-05-13 13:57:55+00:00): Yeah better stay focus during mountian biking, it's risky otherwise. Have you been riding this area for a long time?
kxzav (2020-05-17 09:33:20+00:00): you're right. yep, I grew up not far away so I drove there pretty regularly in my teens, and now with quarantine I picked biking up again.
eggie (2020-05-05 21:32:24+00:00): Dag Nonnominandus,

De parking er niet meer? Dan kan die weg. area = yes is eigenlijk niets in OSM. 
Een nieuw gebouw kan worden geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG (Kadaster)  Je doet dan een verzoek op het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
Zelf iets intekenen is niet gebruikelijk. 
  https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Inlog identiek aan OSM account.
Doe je het verzoek zelf?
MVG,
Eggie
Nonnominandus (2020-05-05 21:45:03+00:00): Top, geen idee dat het zo werkte bedankt!

Ik heb het geplaatst in het draadje dus dan komt het goed!
eggie (2020-05-05 21:53:34+00:00): Vast wel.. Een eerste verzoek heeft altijd even vertraging wegens een eerste accountcheck.
Gewoon even in de gaten houden dat het er niet tussen doorschiet.
Het terrein (nu area = yes ) zal wellicht een bouwterrein zijn nu. Het vlak kun je dan taggen als landuse=construction
Gr eggie
Glassman (2020-05-06 19:29:42+00:00): Please don't vandalize OSM. Many people rely on our free data. I have reverted your vandalized edits but kept the good ones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84717456
Glassman (2020-05-07 02:36:56+00:00): TIP: square the building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84718050
ovruni (2020-05-05 22:30:39+00:00): Hola
Gracias por tu interés en editar en OSM.
En esta edición se ha modificado varias relaciones de distritos en Ayacucho. Se desconoce el motivo y la fuente utilizada para editar algo tan importante como fronteras de distritos, por lo que se ha revertido esta edición.
Por favor coordinar con la comunidad de OSM en Perú para cualquier cambio importante en el mapa: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
Osmegnos (2020-05-06 17:47:07+00:00): Hallo,
die Objekte wurden anhand von Bing Luftbildern eingetragen. Das ist keine gute Wahl. Bing Luftbilder sind ziemlich verzerrt. 
Siehe dazu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden

Um den richtigen Offset heraus zu bekommen, muss das Bing Luftbild anhand von möglichst vielen gpx track verschoben werden, sofern es welche in der näheren Umgebung der Objekte gibt.

Besser wäre es, Esri zu verwenden. In Brandenburg sind die Luftbilder vom Geoportal Brandenburg und Esri fast identisch. Beim Geoportal kann man weiter rein zoomen. Die Bilder sind georeferenziert. Man braucht keinen offset. Die Objekte erscheinen in OSM Karten dort wo sie wirklich sind.

Infos zur verwendung der Luftbilder vom Geoportal gibt es hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal. 

Die funktionieren glaube ich, nicht mit ID sondern nur mit JOSM. Deshalb dann für Brandenburg Esri World Bildmaterial verwenden.
Viele Grüße
cehceh (2020-05-06 18:49:10+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis!
Viele Grüße
aixbrick (2020-05-06 06:53:37+00:00): Wenn du jetzt noch die doppelten Daten entfernen könntest... (das Sozialkaufhaus hätte man auch einfach zurückschieben und anpassen können).
Grundsätzlich fände ich etwas Kommunikation übrigens auch nicht schlecht. Ein kurzer Satz im kommentierten Changeset wie "Habe ich korrigiert." oder so ähnlich, dann weiß man, dass etwas gemacht wurde.
aixbrick (2020-05-07 14:31:20+00:00): Da das ganze auch nach deinen Änderungen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84779158 leider immer noch fehlerhaft ist, habe ich nun die Anpassungen selbst vorgenommen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84838090). Bitte sei zukünftig vorsichtiger beim Mappen.
Frans S (2020-05-06 12:32:59+00:00): Already reviewed by the Crowd2map Tanzania team
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84718468
user_2066394 (2020-05-06 13:06:45+00:00): statt löschen besser mit " disused: " markieren, dann bleibt der ort nachvollziehbar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84718577
user_2066394 (2020-05-06 10:40:28+00:00): statt löschen besser mit " disused: " markieren, dann bleibt der ort nachvollziehbar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84718806
Hacki (2020-05-06 18:36:12+00:00): O.k., danke für den Hinweis!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84718806
totera (2020-05-07 23:30:01+00:00): Scusa Fra00, hai drasticamente cambiato idea su quale criterio seguire per le town?
Fra00 (2020-05-08 09:14:47+00:00): Mi sono adeguato all'opinione più generale dopo la discussione su talk-it.
totera (2020-05-09 10:43:07+00:00): Veramente mi pare che la discussione sia ancora in corso, e tu appena due giorni prima di questa modifica hai sostenuto una posizione completamente diversa.
Fra00 (2020-05-09 11:27:59+00:00): Deve esserci stato qualche malfunzionamento allora perché non mi sono più arrivate mail di notifica dalla discussione. Comunque la mia posizione è: seguire le linee guida. Se si è convenuto che le linee guida italiane erano sbagliate e bisognasse adeguarle a quelle inglesi, ho mantenuto la mia posizione e ho seguito quelle.
totera (2020-05-12 22:37:55+00:00): Credo che avresti fatto meglio ad attendere, come prima ancora avresti fatto meglio a non precipitarti a fare il revert delle modifiche di Fintocubano
Fra00 (2020-05-12 23:30:56+00:00): Ti ripeto, pensavo la discussione fosse chiusa e comunque non mi sembra si sia detto molto nel frattempo. Ho già spiegato le ragioni del revert e il fatto che si sia aperta una discussione in merito nella talk mi sembra che faccia capire che la questione non era così banale, ma non mi sembra di dovermi giustificare con te per nulla.
czubi (2020-05-06 08:20:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800536550
Hallo, es ist sinnvoll die Straßen und Wege immer mit anderen Wegen zu verbinden sonst können sie nicht zum routen verwendet werden
WCJ1002 (2020-05-06 14:38:22+00:00): jo, habe es verbessert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-08-21 16:24:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 89755532 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles in Colombia
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-08-21 16:24:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 89755532 where the changeset comment is: Reverting doodles in Colombia
skorpion62 (2020-06-28 07:01:08+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,

Du hast dem Modellflugplatz eine Adresse gegeben, was ja auch im Normalfall richtig ist.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242361519                                                                                 Nur leider gibt es diese Adresse ein paar km nordwestlich weiter schon.

Ich kann keine Adresse für den Modellflugplatz finden, außer das er sich in Menslage befindet. Es führt auch kein Weg mit dem Namen  „Lohweg“ zum Gebäude, der Feldweg der zum Gebäude führt, hat keinen Namen.

Wo hast Du diese Adresse her?

Viele Grüße skorpion
skorpion62 (2020-07-02 08:56:20+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,

Wo hast Du die Adresse her?

Viele Grüße skorpion62
skorpion62 (2020-07-05 10:16:13+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,
es wäre sehr nett, wenn Du antworten würdest.
Wie kommst du auf die Adresse vom Modellflugplatz?
Viele Grüße skorpion62
NGL-engel (2020-07-06 19:15:52+00:00): Hallo skorpion62, 
    die Adresse kommt von einer Internetseite des Modelflugvereines. Möglicherweise ist es aber auch die Adresse des Vorstandes bzw. eines Mitgliedes. Ich habe sie jedenfalls gerade gelöscht. 
Gruß
    NGL-engel
skorpion62 (2020-07-07 08:25:58+00:00): Hallo NGL-engel,

so sieht das besser aus, das Gelände hast Du ja auch schon ausgeweitet.

Nun aber zum Thema:
Ich habe mit einem Mitglied aus dem Vorstand gesprochen.
Für dieses Gebäude gibt es keine Adresse, das läuft alles über den Vorstand bzw. Schriftführer.
Demnach ist es auch keine Adresse aus dem Vorstand oder eines anderen Mitgliedes.

Die Internetseite, wo Du die Adresse wahrscheinlich gefunden hast, ist wohl ein Shop (RC-Maps) und nicht die Seite vom MSC Artland. So steht es im Impressum. Man sollte nicht alles glauben, was im Internet steht.

Außerdem gibt es den Lohweg 4 schon nordwestlich von diesem Gelände, den hast Du ja auch eingetragen. Das hätte Dir schon zu Denken geben müssen.

Ich bitte Dich nochmals, bevor Du was einträgst, genauer zu kontrollieren (vor Ort ist wichtig) und nicht nur vom Luftbild abzeichnen. Denn diese Daten sind schon teilweise mehrere Jahre alt. Du brauchst nicht fast jeden Abend mehrere 100 qkm mappen, denn weniger  kann auch mehr sein. OSM lebt von genauen Daten.
Denk bitte mal darüber nach.

Viele Grüße skorpion62
Frans S (2020-05-06 12:30:09+00:00): Already reviewed by siwilde.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84719616
letihu (2021-01-07 18:28:46+00:00): Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800545528/history
fehlt noch das Ende der Öffnungszeit.
Sa 14:00 ist etwas zu wenig ;-)
dkudlek (2021-01-12 21:48:18+00:00): Auf dem Schild stand damals nur: ab 14 Uhr.
Laut facebook haben die noch andere Uhrzeiten und eine Adresse, die ich hinzugefügt habe.
letihu (2021-01-13 07:22:00+00:00): Bei Öffnungszeiten ohne feste Schließzeiten (Open End, Offenes Ende) wird der Startzeit oder der Mindestendzeit (z.B. bei bekannter Küchenschließzeit) ein "+" angehängt: "22:00 Uhr bis open end": 22:00+, "Sonntag ab 9:00 Uhr": Su 09:00+, "Geöffnet 18 Uhr bis der letzte Gast geht, warme Küche von 18 bis 22 Uhr": 18:00-22:00+.

So stehts im Wiki
chachafish (2020-05-06 04:22:53+00:00): Hello. Will you please stop deleting the work of other users and replacing them with your own?  If you have not read the OSM Good Practice wiki, here is a link. Thank you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
chachafish (2020-05-06 04:27:34+00:00): I just looked at your changeset history and noticed that I already sent you a link to the OSM Good Practice wiki 10 days ago. Can you explain why you continue to disregard the wiki after it was already pointed out to you?
neal33 (2020-05-06 15:49:49+00:00): Good morning - while I understand the importance of historical data, sometimes there has to be some give.  I edited the items that were not very poorly placed but some of the items were too far off to adjust in a timely manner.  I must ask you, what is more important, historical data or accurate data.
neal33 (2020-05-06 16:01:47+00:00): I will try this "For JOSM there is a tool "replace geometry" in the plugin utilsplugin2. With this you can draw a new outline of an object and then move the history of the old outline to the new outline: simply select both objects, then press CTRL+SHIFT+G." but am unsure how to do that using the iD browser editor.
neal33 (2020-05-06 16:07:23+00:00): "Can you explain why you continue to disregard the wiki after it was already pointed out to you?"
I do find this comment to be a bit unnecessary.  I responded to your questions in the previous discussion thread and got no response.
chachafish (2020-05-07 00:47:09+00:00): Hello, thank you for your response. You mention that you received no response in the previous changeset comment chain. I’m looking at that discussion. You did not ask any questions or ask for information and it looks like the conversation was at an end. If you would ever like responses or information, I will always be happy to respond promptly. Please feel free to ask.

As for the rest, the OSM Good Practice wiki link was provided to you and you were asked to not delete the work of other users and to comply with the OSM Good Practice wiki. After the wiki was pointed out to you, you continued to delete the work of other users in contravention of the wiki. 

You say, “some of the items were too far off to adjust in a timely manner.” 

I’ve reviewed this changeset and the objects you added are extremely similar to the objects you have deleted. The original edits could easily have been modified and the history could have been saved. You can see a comparison of the two versions in the link below. 

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=84720229

Of course, there are situations where the work of other users can be deleted. If a building is torn down, it can be deleted. If a road no longer exists, it can be deleted, etc. However, in this case, there was no need to delete the objects. So, I will again ask you to please stop deleting the work of other users and please comply with the OSM Good Practice wiki. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Thank you and good luck with your mapping.
neal33 (2020-05-07 04:23:51+00:00): I will ask again: I will try this "For JOSM there is a tool "replace geometry" in the plugin utilsplugin2. With this you can draw a new outline of an object and then move the history of the old outline to the new outline: simply select both objects, then press CTRL+SHIFT+G." but am unsure how to do that using the iD browser editor. 
Are you able to provide any insight, or are you just trying to be a stickler for rules?
neal33 (2020-05-07 04:25:18+00:00): From my perspective I am trying to make this a better community by updating the data to be more accurate.  Instead of trying to better the solution, you instead just want to hide behind the wiki.
neal33 (2020-05-07 04:27:15+00:00): Adding 50-100 data points to a previously added item is not time efficient.  I must ask again, what is the purpose of maintaining poorly placed data.
neal33 (2020-05-07 04:33:43+00:00): Please take a look at the examples you provided.  While the data is similar, it is lacking many necessary data points.  If nearly 100% of the points are inaccurate it is not valid data.
neal33 (2020-05-07 04:38:03+00:00): If you notice on most of the edits of the course I did in fact edit the items rather than delete them.  But for the items in your screenshot, those were 100% inaccurate.
chachafish (2020-05-07 17:22:21+00:00): Good morning, neal33. As for the JOSM plugin you are asking about, I have no idea how to use it. I don't have experience with it, so I can't say. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask. Good luck with your mapping :)
Hightide10 (2020-05-05 22:46:42+00:00): Maxar Premium Imagery (1.36, 4.93); Strava
Wynona Ryder (2020-09-29 17:30:45+00:00): Salam Abdallah,

do you really mean https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dhot_spring ?
fogey (2020-05-24 01:20:30+00:00): Hello it is very uncommon for three tracks to come to one switch. Could you please resurvey this and fix it?
fogey (2020-05-24 01:32:41+00:00): I see what is going on here. just a note we can't have railway lines going through buildings. in addition the lines you created new extend much further than pictured at lines need to be set to service:yard or spur unless it is the primary route. Are you local ? can you resurvey this?  Please set the tracks that have been removed to at least railway=abandoned or if there are buildings to railway=razed. There is a new tagging schema for this but it is not showing on openrailwaymap yet.
chachafish (2020-05-24 03:42:17+00:00): Howdy :) Thank you for your comments. In this area there are existing rails, rails that are being removed and rails that are planned/under construction. Groundbreaking commenced  just recently. The rails are not actually going through buildings. The buildings are tagged as being under construction. Foundations are being laid, etc. The rails that exist (if they still exist) are in the process of being removed as the buildings are being built. The exact status of each part of the rails vs. the buildings on a day-to-day basis is unknown (until we get newer imagery), but if you have knowledge as to their status, then that would be a welcome addition to OSM. Cheers :)
j1scad (2020-05-08 19:49:19+00:00): Kraftfahrstraßen sind nicht automatisch highway=trunk, die B 279 bei Bischofsheim ist z.B. nicht kreuzungsfrei, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk. Bitte wieder korrigieren.

Schöne Grüße
Frans S (2020-05-06 12:27:34+00:00): Hello. See my comments on changeset 84721711
these also apply to this one
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84721268
PT-53 (2020-08-05 07:01:35+00:00): Hallo RicoSc,
Du hast bei diesen Straßenabschnitten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553455004/history
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553455002/history
das Merkmal
highway=proposed.
abgeändert in
highway=residential
Wenn die Straße fertiggestellt und für den Verkehr freigegeben ist sollte auch noch das Merkmal
construction=living_street
gelöscht werden.

Welcher Straßentyp ist eigentlich richtig:
residential oder living_street?

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-08-05 07:04:26+00:00): PS:
Bitte schau Dir auch noch diesen  Fußweg an:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553455000/history

Gefunden mit OSM-Inspector:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.68358&lat=48.10486&zoom=11&opacity=0.34
PT-53 (2020-08-05 07:11:14+00:00): Korrekter OSM-Inspector-Link:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.03918&lat=48.42147&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways
PT-53 (2020-08-24 05:33:13+00:00): Hallo RicoSc,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-01 06:08:54+00:00): Hallo RicoSc,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-20 07:51:10+00:00): Erledigt
Frans S (2020-05-06 12:06:24+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping. 
A question. Did you join the slack channel Crow2map Tanzania? There are specific guidelines how and what to map. You can request for a review which will be done by experienced  validators
See this link
https://crowd2map.slack.com/join/shared_invite/zt-dhhcwlkg-ROTlhoST1Rsz9Edhm67hsw#/
I will come back with remarks on these mappings
cc @sab27
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84721711