piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vilson Gartner (2021-05-18 14:04:53+00:00): Olá,
compreendi a discussão sobre o tema no GitHub, mas sem essas sinalizações, os algoritmos de rotas sugeriam trajetos incorretos e/ou manobras não permitidas.
Após a adição das referidas restrições, os trajetos foram apresentados de forma correta, conforme o esperado no "mundo real".
santamariense (2021-03-09 15:00:47+00:00): Olá ClesioLima,

Notei que tu adiciounou a tag access=no em
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162393450 referente a obras na região. Sabe dizer se já foi concluída ou tem previsão de conclusão desta obra?

[]'s

santamariense
tomhukins (2020-06-23 16:37:48+00:00): It seems odd to add these "service roads" without the car parks that they provide access to.  It makes the map look strange to someone with local knowledge, and might confuse people who don't know the area.
hrikrib (2020-06-25 03:19:12+00:00): thanks for the suggestions. It is good that local knowledge is improving our edits. Please find the changeset (87110412) for the suggested modifications. I will make sure to classify the highway tag in more detailed manner. Please let me know in case of anymore suggestions.always happy to learn from the community.
Mathias_ADAV5962 (2020-04-27 15:22:13+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai remis highway = path pour ce chemin. track c'est plutot pour les chemin agricole avec vehicule motorisé
Luzandro (2023-01-06 07:03:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3506238
viloan (2019-10-15 14:31:48+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-10-15 14:39:41+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
2maxic (2019-11-30 09:12:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
LeTopographeFou (2020-10-11 13:57:02+00:00): Hi, regarding equestrian shop I suggest to change it to in used shop=equestrian. What do you think? I propose to make the change.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-23 19:33:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2523716
historic=* is describing or characterising an object and not a date. It seems you have been trying to put a date in the historic key. Maybe you should use start_date?
Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Ahistoric and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date
mavl (2019-10-16 15:28:51+00:00): Здравствуйте. Понимаю, когда люди удаляют некоторую устаревшую информацию. Но разве информация в тегах end_date и source:end_date устарела? Или вы считаете, что эта информация неправильная?
Noro Hibu (2019-10-16 16:57:40+00:00): На мой взгляд это уже относится к исторической информации о когда-то существовавшем н.п. Таким же образом можно создать отношение СССР и поставить тег end_date. Только какой в этом смысл... На своей точке зрения не настаиваю, если лично вам нужна эта информация, восстановите конечно.
mavl (2019-10-16 17:17:11+00:00): Если принять вашу точку зрения, то тег end_date тогда вообще не нужен, так как если он появился на объекте, то этот объект нужно удалить как исторический.  
  
В случае с СССР действительно никакого смысла нет, так как на его месте возникли другие государства с другими названиями. Но на месте заброшенной деревни ничего другого не появилось. Объект place=locality в OSM для него есть. А у любого объекта может быть тег end_date.
mavl (2019-10-16 17:30:11+00:00): В taginfo у тега end_date 647 использований совместно с тегом place. Это не очень много, но показывает, что для людей это имеет смысл. Пожалуй, я восстановлю это два тега.
viloan (2019-10-15 14:53:40+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Anakil (2019-10-15 21:16:56+00:00): Hello xogalla,

I have a question : is there a particular reason to have put these man_made=works on some of these sites ? Being from the area, I wouldn't qualify these sites as industrial ground or factory but more labs and office. They don't produce a lot of stuff here (at least from what i know). But maybe you have another source ?! ^_^

Happy mapping,
xogalla (2019-10-16 08:02:45+00:00): Hello Anakil,

indeed I've wanted to map several company grounds here. Do you know a better suiting tag for the enclosed grounds of a single company – even when it's not from manufacturing?

Kind regards
Anakil (2019-10-16 08:27:08+00:00): There is not really a tag for the company parcel, because we generally don't tag parcels in OSM for many reasons including the fact that it can change quickly and it is not verifiable on the ground (see a list of these reasons on the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Parcel). The only case i saw where we map an area in a commercial park, is for sub-division that are named differently that the main "park". Like for "Parc Monnet" (also in LLN) and one of the sub area is "Monnet Center" which include multiple buildings with multiple companies. It is like a commercial park inside a commercial park, so there we generally creating a second area with the same landuse=* tag but with different name. It is not really recommended but sometimes it can be a way to map it (until someone find a better scheme for it ;-) ). 

For companies, what i would do myself is : 
- I would map the company names and information on a node or the main building for each one of them. In that case, we can use the "office=company" (or any office=* tag) + name=* if that's an office (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office). You can also have other type of place, but i don't think they would fit in this case as it is mostly offices and labs (at least i think so ;p). It could sometimes also be a shop or a craft (artisinal production), and if so you can use the related tag (you have a similar list of value for shop=* or craft=* on the wiki).
For real industrial places (here there is none of that), the landuse=industrial + industrial=* subtag should help and maybe man_made=works or other for matching sites (see more on the wiki ! Like the list of industrial subtag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:industrial). 
- Secondly, i would map the details like fences, hedges, grass area, trees, ... in the area. And generally that should be enough to identify the area on the map very well. 

These two steps would at least be verifiable on the ground, and well represent the reality.

Kind Regards
Bytemark (2019-10-16 09:38:01+00:00): Most of the companies mapped there seem to produce either pharmaceuticals or medical equipment. So I would be totally OK with man_made=works.
Anakil (2019-10-16 09:49:48+00:00): On the ground it doesn't seem to be production site (to me a production site is an industrial plant like you have for Solvay in La Hulpe or near big harbour like Dunlerque...). From the one I know, it is only R&D happening there as it is linked to the university in Louvain-la-Neuve. I don't know of an intermediate tag between office and man_made=works for labs used during R&D...
tania979 (2019-10-15 15:09:15+00:00): #missingmaps #amm #cork
phaerrax (2020-10-04 22:43:23+00:00): Hi! The name tag should not be used to describe or label the feature: the fact that this shop is a newsagent is already (correctly) encoded in the "shop=newsagent" tag, without the need for "name=Edicola". The same goes with your other changes around the station building.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice.
andrewwiseman (2020-02-18 22:44:50+00:00): Thanks for mapping. The "Name" field is for the proper name of the thing, like High Street or Highway 1.
tania979 (2019-10-15 15:08:29+00:00): #missingmaps #amm #cork
woodpeck (2019-10-17 22:56:20+00:00): Es wäre hilfreich, Details über die verwendeten Quellen anzugeben - welcher Kunstführer genau (damit man prüfen kann, ob es urheberrechtliche Bedenken gegen die Weiterverwendung der Daten gibt), und wo findet man diesen Schematismus (aus dem gleichen Grund). Danke.
Glassman (2019-10-15 18:40:23+00:00): Based on the name, this business sounds more like amenity=clinic than amenity=hospital. I changed it. I also
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75731637
Glassman (2019-10-15 18:41:27+00:00): Forgot to finish my comment. I also merged the building and node since they are the same. 

If the clinic is really a hospital feel free to change it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75731733
user_5359 (2019-10-16 15:41:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4900764063/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I  move the node back to the original position.
Frans S (2019-10-16 17:05:51+00:00): Hello eduke722
Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. You hardly squared the buildings you have mapped. Just 2 out of 140 squared. 
Please square always the buildings you map with the Q key and watch for the issue messages on the issue triangle in the right hand menu, It warns you about issues like these.
Also be more accurate in following the outlines of the buildings you map. 
Do not cross highways with buildings. You 've got 3 warnings for that which you ignored.
Best regards and keep mapping
evod (2019-12-07 14:07:10+00:00): Servus, du hast in der Lobau auf Salten- und Vorwerkstraße teilweise bicycle=yes entfernt, ich habe es wieder hinzugefügt weil man dort soweit ich weiß radeln darf (und vehicle=forestry würde es sonst verbieten)
LG!
mbethke (2019-10-16 05:54:19+00:00): Is this really one big building? Because you mapped another building inside it as a node - one of them doesn't make sense. And natural=landform doesn't render as anything. I'd say remove that and add office=company to the building.
cheers,
Matthias
mavl (2019-11-16 17:59:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77162861, 77164108, 77168783, 77165597, 77167134, 77158548, 77170414, 77161342 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3257].
gscholz (2019-10-16 04:38:12+00:00): Hi Julio,
the quality of your building mappings is very low. The buildings do not have a rectangular shape, are attached to streets, have duplicate nodes (which I fixed), are attached to each other even when there is space between them etc.

Can you please improve your mapping style?
Guido
fkv (2021-10-14 21:41:02+00:00): In diesem Edit hast du die richtig gemappte Rossbachklamm gelöscht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/72765511/history) und durch einen falschen Node ersetzt. Warum?
Jgaordhelagenornres (2021-10-16 17:36:58+00:00): Meinst du die Sehenswürdigkeit "Roßbachklamm"?
Ich wusste nicht, dass eine Sehenswürdigkeit auch auf eine Linie Bezug nehmen kann - außerdem ist das ganze schon wieder 2 Jahre her.
Wie ich aber gerade sehe, hast du die Roßbachklamm eh wieder als Linie gemappt. Danke dafür.
fkv (2021-10-16 18:07:57+00:00): Du siehst eh, dass man das kann. Selbst wenn es laut Wiki nicht für Linien vorgesehen wäre, geht es hier gar nicht anders, weil die Klamm in erster Linie eine Klamm ist. Dass sie sehenswürdig ist, ist nur eine Eigenschaft.
mueschel (2019-10-16 08:09:11+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the ways you uploaded here? They all have only foreign tags - was this a mistake?
E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/734887551

Jan
mor (2019-10-23 18:57:34+00:00): Perdona, el comentario sobre la abreviatura Av. era para este conjunto de cambios. Al iniciar sesión se me ha ido a otro sitio y no me he dado cuenta.
user_5359 (2019-10-16 15:49:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between description and name. You didn't need a tag name=playground if you has the tag leisure=playground (for example).
SomeoneElse (2019-12-14 23:03:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78418905 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some mechanical edits involving 'subway'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3277 and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/77145512 for an explanation why there is a problem with this change.
viloan (2019-10-15 16:57:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-10-16 15:52:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why is only the small part of 111th Street a secondary highway?

If you need help, You are welcome!
eggie (2019-10-15 17:26:37+00:00): Beste ejp..  Mag je er niet fietsen of kun je er niet fietsen. In dat laatste geval geen bicycle=no gebruiken.
We taggen alleen bicycle=no als er een fietsverbod is.
Bij een bord ook beter vehicle=no taggen ipv bicycle=no
Er zijn ook nog brommers en snorfietsen.
Je kunt nog wel aangeven surface=??? sand, gravel?? 
smoothness=bad  ?? 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-15 17:28:23+00:00): Tip: Op een footway hoef je niet aan te geven dat je er niet mag fietsen of wel mag lopen.
eggie (2019-10-15 17:30:13+00:00): idem.. tags zijn al default. Het is een wandelpad.
Hier de default accesstags voor Nederland
Wat groen is hoeft niet getagd te worden. 
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-15 17:59:01+00:00): Zie hier: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
Hier kun je zien wat al default is.
Kwaad kan het niet, maar bicycle=no  hoef je niet te noemen op een footway.
eggie (2019-10-15 17:32:24+00:00): ejp
Is hier een fietsverbod ?  Zo ja dan vehicle=no taggen ipv bicycle=no
Geef svp concreet aan wat je hebt getagd. 
Gr eggie
viloan (2019-10-15 17:11:08+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
os-emmer (2024-02-10 14:37:04+00:00): Hallo öreg,
was ist emergency=FFW?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259064245
Ist da eine Feuerwache von einer freiwilligen Feuerwehr?
öreg (2024-02-10 18:44:06+00:00): Ich habe heute keine Ahnung. Im Sommer werde ich hinradeln und ich kucke mir das an.
Gruß   Georg (öreg)
os-emmer (2024-02-10 19:03:11+00:00): Danke für die Schnelle Rückmeldung. Damit es nicht in Vergessenheit gerät habe ich einen Hinweis erstellt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4107470
MaGIStokrat (2024-02-13 19:55:27+00:00): Hallo zusammen,
ich denke @öreg muss da nicht nochmal extra hinradeln.
Das Gebäude beherbergt die Garage/Rüsthaus nebst Schlauchturm der FFW Freiwilligen Feuerwehr Gosda II und ist zudem Bestandteil des Lausitzer Museenlands.

building=fire_station wäre daher hier m.E. angebracht.
VG
öreg (2024-02-13 20:05:55+00:00): Ich danke Dir! Ich habe jetzt ein Feuerwehrikon editiert. Es sieht man relativ zeitig.
os-emmer (2024-02-15 17:37:11+00:00): Ich habe das emergency=FFW jetzt weggenommen und building=fire_station gesetzt.
gscholz (2019-10-16 04:32:22+00:00): Hi Hora,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the osm database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-55.31847&lat=-26.95636&zoom=16&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Are you going to fix this?
Guido
dvdhoven (2019-10-15 18:55:34+00:00): Merkwaardig commentaar, 70-85 is een rwn route en geen rcn route. En wandelroutes krijgen nooit forward/backward.
Wel is met deze changeset de sortering van de rcn route 04-87 verstoord en met een eerdere changeset de sortering van 02-04.
In beide gevallen liep de terugrichting niet goed. De terugrichting begint op dezelfde plek als de heenrichting en loopt dan tegen de rijrichting in. Wel moet de forward/backward uiteraard wel de goede waarde hebben voor de rijrichting.
Alleen de volgorde in de relatie is tegen de rijrichting in,
Ik heb nu 02-04 en 04-87 weer goed gesorteerd.
Je kunt overigens ook https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/overview raadplegen nadat je rcn of rwn routes hebt aangepast. Na plusminus 10 minuten kun je zien of alles goed verlopen is.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
user_242798 (2019-10-15 19:47:36+00:00): Correct, ik dacht dat ik vandaag uitsluitend met bicycle routes bezig was... en dan vind ik een G13 beter dan een cobblestone. Foutje dus.
gscholz (2019-10-16 04:32:26+00:00): Hi Hora,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the osm database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-55.31847&lat=-26.95636&zoom=16&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Are you going to fix this?
Guido
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-25 08:16:35+00:00): Note that individual enclosures are not separate zoos, tagging every enclosure as zoo is incorrect.
lmason_aph (2019-10-25 12:18:13+00:00): Hello Mateusz,
This is a cut and paste of the rule from the Wiki that I used. It comes up if you put ‘zoo=enclosure’ into the search bar:

“Part of zoo fits this description
Create an area inside tourism=zoo and tag it zoo=enclosure. 
If you are not sure of its border you can place a single node in the middle and tag it zoo=enclosure but the area is preferable. 
If given object has its own name then name=* is useful. “

As I interpret this, I have tagged them correctly. They are tagged nodes inside of zoo areas. Since another mapper started this before our organization was asked by the venue to map it, and there is some remodeling going into the new year, we did don’t want to create finite ‘areas’ until the remodeling is complete, so I used the less preferable, but still acceptable node/enclosure method as specified by the Wiki until we can visually survey the site post renovation.
I hope this clearly explains my rational for tagging these elements this way. 
Regards,
Lem Mason
Louisville, KY
lmason_aph (2019-10-25 14:33:16+00:00): I am further concerned, because it has come to my attention another mapper made edits at the same time, and the first one I clicked on, which was "Zebra Area" has Lynx listed as the wiki entry, so with three mappers making edits the duplicates and consistency are now an issue. May we discuss this through email to come to a consensus about how it should be tagged? I feel I am correct in in my tagging according to the wiki, but a consensus might be the most important issue right now. Thank you for adding info in the tags and your help in this matter.
freebeer (2019-10-26 02:53:20+00:00): the first node below i pulled up was not tagged as you described at any point in its history as zoo=enclosure, but as a duplicate tourism=zoo which is incorrect.

i have not checked further past this one.