piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Dimacn (2019-08-17 18:31:52+00:00): В name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  Удалите названия.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:32:09+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Dimacn (2019-08-17 18:30:28+00:00): В name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  Пожалуйста удалите названия.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:32:18+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Nmxosm (2019-08-04 09:17:15+00:00): Hey,

please be careful about blindly using iD presets without local knowledge. It is heavily biased towards the developers' view (from the US?) and has been criticised therefore multiple times. 

Greetings
Nmxosm
one_half_3544 (2022-02-24 21:39:51+00:00): Please don't add private information to the map (start/lunch/etc).
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:34:14+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
nevw (2019-07-29 08:05:30+00:00): I shifted yor bar off the roadway. Please place it over the building it occupies.
elgolfo (2019-09-24 13:23:23+00:00): Ich habe dieses Changeset wieder revertiert.
elgolfo (2019-07-29 09:24:41+00:00): Hi gruenesoosse,

du hast die Note zur Bäckerei Eichhorst ohne Kommentar geschlossen und auch das Fixme Tag entfernt, ohne jedoch das Problem gelöst zu haben (die Frage war, wie die Öffnungszeiten außerhalb der Saison sind). 
Bitte  trage deine Öffnungszeiten der Nebensaison nach – so du sie denn rausgefunden hast. Oder stelle das Fixme Tag wieder her und öffne die Note erneut.

Dinge ohne Erkenntnisgewinn  kommentarlos entfernen oder schließen, bringt nix.

Wurde denn die Powerline, die offensichtlich außer Betrieb war, und du wieder als aktiv getaggt hast, auch im echten Leben wieder aktiviert? Wie hast du das rausgefunden?

Moritz
elgolfo (2019-09-24 13:23:51+00:00): Ich habe dieses Changeset wieder revertiert.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:36:58+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
abakus_uploader (2019-07-29 22:30:38+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:38:53+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:39:33+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:40:53+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:41:03+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:41:35+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:41:53+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:52:37+00:00): UKR: added destination=Днiпро;added destination:ref=M-04;destination:int_ref=E 40;added destination=Ізварине;added destination:ref=H-21
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:42:03+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:42:58+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:43:06+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
monxton (2020-06-01 17:08:26+00:00): Ticker Berkin, would you please explain why you think permissive is the wrong access value for this gate? The sign before the gate says "Permission to proceed may be assumed when the gate is open". 

Currently the road is not routable because of the access values on the gates, even though the road itself is marked access=permissive.
Ticker Berkin (2020-06-02 07:20:07+00:00): Hi Monxton, my understanding of access=permissive was that it isn't a right-of-way but the landowner allows general public use while retaining the right to withdraw permission some time in the future. Often the way will be closed one day a year to protect this right.
see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
and https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/blog/2018/07/right-to-roam-public-rights-of-way/
Before I changed the gate access, my device would calculate a route through the military base and I would be confronted by a locked gate when trying to get somewhere.
monxton (2020-06-04 15:57:26+00:00): I'm surprised your experience is so different to mine. I've never found the gates closed. I was there on Tuesday (reason I was trying to route that way), so I took a photo: https://dgtzuqphqg23d.cloudfront.net/SdOczq6dh94DYpThFIaR1MIyfCBIHBDKsJzDY2laRfA-2048x2048.jpg
Was there any particular time of day / time of year you were having a problem? I searched "road closure under the porton and winterbourne gunner military lands byelaws 1977" and found there was a month-long closure in Summer 2019. Even so, I still don't think that making the road unroutable at all times is an appropriate mapping solution.
Ticker Berkin (2020-06-05 10:52:01+00:00): Hi, If you consider one or both of these gates to be generally open, then please change them back to permissive or let me know. I also changed the gate at the SE end of Winterslow road (2208500323) and this looked very private at the time. Is it ever possible to route through the Danger Area?
monxton (2020-06-05 16:49:36+00:00): Thanks I have done so, and added a note to the road itself, though I don't think any router will flag it up. It was actually the SE gate where the photo was taken. 

Not sure I understand your routing question. The access sign says "public must keep to the road at all times", so no, access is strictly on the road only.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:44:11+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:44:37+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:46:37+00:00): UKR: added destination=Киiв;added destination:ref=M-03
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:46:02+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:45:39+00:00): UKR: added destination=Мукачево;added destination:ref=M-06
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:47:02+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:31:42+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:32:24+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:33:48+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:33:57+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-30 11:26:43+00:00): I would like to draw attention to your mapping team: be extra careful to map potential highways in this area with paddy fields surrounding it.

For example, this highway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/708427243) was mapped as an unclassified highway.

I drive around this area a few times a month. Usually highways adjacent to canals are merely dirt track for agricultural purposes. It may appear quite prominent, e.g. http://osmz.ru/imagery/#17/5.87901/100.44482/mp (from the imagery) but please, please take extra care.

I hope your team would begin fix this issue. Please let me know when it's completed.
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-30 11:28:03+00:00): This issue might also affect every potential highways which have been mapped as highway=unclassified or highway=residential.

Please, hopefully your team's edits are re-reviewed.
imi007 (2019-08-26 03:18:39+00:00): Hi  AkuAnakTimur,

Thank you, for the detailed inputs and explanation in such areas all the necessary changes have been made here.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:34:17+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:34:27+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
andergrin (2019-07-29 14:07:00+00:00): Тегування проїзду крізь будинок: 
highway=service
tunnel=building_passage
Без layer
gileri (2019-07-29 09:58:39+00:00): Merci !
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:39:04+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-29 09:07:57+00:00): UKR: added destination=Сичавка;added destination:ref=M28;added tag oneway=no
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:22:28+00:00): UKR: added destination=Сичавка;added destination:ref=M-28;added tag oneway=no
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:40:13+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:51:11+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:58:17+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:01:49+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-30 11:01:53+00:00): Hi ArjunIsIt, welcome to OSM.
Is there really a cafe or is this a test?
Thanks.
ArjunIsIt (2019-07-30 11:03:35+00:00): It is a test. I am unable to generate a sample map.
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-30 11:07:54+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
Your changeset has been reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72806450

#revert
--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:54:46+00:00): UKR: added destination=Первомайське;Джанкой;Харків;destination:ref=35A-002;destination:int_ref=E 105
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:08:18+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:21:24+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:52:48+00:00): UKR: added destination=Kиїв;Одеса;destination:ref=M-05;destination:int_ref=E 95
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:28:08+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
nw520 (2019-08-02 19:49:02+00:00): Hallo osm_saint-louis,
bitte verschiebe `public_transport=platform`s nicht auf die Straße. Das ist nur für das selten gebrauchte `public_transport=stop_position` sinnvoll.
SHARCRASH (2019-07-29 10:15:11+00:00): + tag additions (information board)
mavl (2019-11-10 13:04:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:34:59+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:35:37+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:36:02+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:36:21+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
mike140 (2019-07-30 17:29:27+00:00): Припиніть займатися вандалізмом та поверніть все що ви "почистили" тут та в інших місцях
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72764237
BCNorwich (2019-07-29 19:32:12+00:00): Hi, 
You're making a lot of mistakes in the mapping you added around here.

You've drawn several paths on top of sections of service roads. 
You've drawn hedges as area features. A hedge is a barrier, a linear feature.
Some paths are drawn over buildings.

Could you please take the time to look at and rectify these problems.

Regards Bernard.
yeeeetlazar (2019-07-29 19:38:51+00:00): Sorry Bernard,
Would you mind showing me what it looks correct so I can improve in the future
Thanks, Dwight Gros
BCNorwich (2019-07-30 06:49:09+00:00): Hi,
Here is a link to show where the paths duplicate existing highways :- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-3.35713&lat=53.34820&zoom=17&overlays=duplicated_edges

If you wish I can rectify the duplications and hedges? 
I would like to know please if there really are formal footpaths between and around all those buildings?

Regards Bernard.
yeeeetlazar (2019-07-30 10:24:57+00:00): Thanks for your reply,
Yes I can confirm there footpaths all around it I've been there. Its not that clear on the map.
I'm deleting the the dups thanks :)
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:36:32+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:36:59+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:37:42+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
eggie (2019-07-29 11:26:27+00:00): Dag Stefan,  cuisine=vis   is geen Engels.
In OSM is Engels de taal in de tagging. 
Beetje ook een lastige, want is het ook niet gewoon een viszaak?
Welke vlag dekt de lading het beste? 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-29 11:26:57+00:00): Michael de Meij heb ik verwijderd hier.
StefanJanssen (2019-07-29 11:34:09+00:00): Dat klopt inderdaad, de eerste paar tags die waren voorgesteld waren in het Nederlands (maar het engelse woord was hetzelfde) en de rest van de site is om een of andere reden ook in het Nederlands. Vandaar de verwarring.

Ook het vlagtype was mij onduidelijk, al lijkt het het meeste op FastFood omdat het over the counter is, misschien is snackbar iets correcter. Vanwege deze twijfel is ook waarom ik had aangegeven dat het nagekeken moest worden.
Ik heb niet zoveel ervaring met dit type nodes, ik heb tot nu toe eigenlijk alleen maar wegen aangepast.
StefanJanssen (2019-07-29 11:39:42+00:00): Ik zie net dat er geen "snackbar" type is, wel cafetaria al past dat dan weer niet.
eggie (2019-07-29 11:42:30+00:00): Zou zelf gewoon voor viswinkel gaan, want de meeste viswinkels verkopen ook gebakken vis en een haring met uitjes om daar op te eten.
Zou dus gaan voor shop=seafood
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dseafood
Zal er eens een visje halen.. :)
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-29 11:43:34+00:00): For establishments selling fish prepared as food. Use amenity=fast_food/amenity=restaurant + cuisine=seafood/cuisine=fish/cuisine=fish_and_chips/... instead.
eggie (2019-07-29 11:44:45+00:00): Wellicht het laatste toch beter en dan cuisine=seafood of fish
eggie (2019-07-29 11:46:28+00:00): Een lastige... zou dus nog even in die wiki kijken. In ieder geval = vis even veranderen in fish
StefanJanssen (2019-07-29 11:46:53+00:00): Ga ik doen
Constable (2019-07-30 16:18:31+00:00): ciao, occhio perchè con questa modifica hai danneggiato la geometria di via tangitt
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=72764667
Provvedo a ripristinare
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:41:54+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:42:21+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:44:34+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:44:45+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
bielebog (2019-07-29 20:21:50+00:00): Da Du "review requested" ausgewählt hattest, erlaube ich mir, ein paar Kommentare:

addr:street des Apartmenthauses steht nun auf "Ranthumer Str." – die Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19624239#map=19/51.35039/9.45371 , an der das Haus liegt, jedoch "Rantumer Straße", ohne 'h'. Das bezieht sich wohl auf "Rantum" auf Sylt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240057964 , was wohl korrekt ohne 'h' geschrieben wird. Desweiteren sind Abkürzungen wie "Str." für Straße 
in Openstreetmap unüblich. Das müsste also im addr:street auch ausgeschrieben sein, allein, damit die Zugehörigkeit zur Straße passt.

Dann erstreckt sich Dein Changeset über einen größeren regionalen Bereich. Die Commity behält besser den Überblick, wenn man die Changesets kleiner hält und lokal begrenzt.

Bei der Stromleitung https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42859507 hattest Du voltage von 0 auf 110kV geändert. Gab es da eine reale Änderung. Man beachte die note=* des Vorbearbeiters.
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:51:27+00:00): UKR: added destination:ref=M-07;destination:int_ref=E 373
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:19:55+00:00): UKR: added destination=Киiв;added destination:ref=M-06
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:49:02+00:00): UKR: added destination:ref=M-03;destination:int_ref=E 40
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:49:56+00:00): UKR: added destination:ref=M-03;destination:int_ref=E 40
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:19:05+00:00): UKR: added destination=Iванiвка;Луганськ;added destination:ref=Р-21
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:46:01+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:46:24+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:46:53+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:47:04+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:47:27+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:48:05+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:48:18+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Frans S (2019-08-02 16:59:20+00:00): Hello Akash Soni.  A short remark on the quality of your mappings.
You mapped 42 buildings here and none has been squared. This is an important issue. Please review your mapping skills and use each time you have mapped a building the Q key in iDeditor,
Best regards
Frans S (2019-08-02 17:02:45+00:00): Another issue  Please use the MAXAR P image in which the instructions refer.  Bing is to old to be reliable.
Please reopen this changeset  in Id editor tor and use the MAXAR P image to map the rest of the buildings,  Try to correct and square the others as well, Correct also the offset. 
Best regards
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:51:25+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
elgolfo (2019-07-29 11:50:23+00:00): Das ging ja fix. Dankeschön.
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-29 14:08:15+00:00): UKR: added destination=Броди;added destination:ref=M06
User1 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:18:13+00:00): UKR: added destination=Броди;added destination:ref=M-06
User4 - Lightcyphers (2019-07-31 08:47:02+00:00): UKR: added destination:ref=M-06;destination:int_ref=E 50;E 471
eggie (2019-07-29 12:12:59+00:00): Stefan .. normaliter maak je geen adressen aan in osm. Die zijn er al in de vorm van de BAG adresnodes. Bakker Bart geeft zelf aan dat ze op nummer 14 zitten Je kunt dus gewoon adresnode 14 gebruiken. 
14a is ook bij het Kadaster niet bekend. 
Info kun je kopieren naar nr. 14
Eggie
StefanJanssen (2019-07-29 12:15:04+00:00): Volgens de website van BakkerBart zitten ze wel op 14a
https://bakkerbart.nl/winkels/dordrecht
eggie (2019-07-29 12:22:44+00:00): Wonderlijk.... 
Adres: Achterom 14, 3311 KC Dordrecht
Openingstijden: Geopend ⋅ Sluit om 17:00
Telefoon: 078 202 0200
Zal wel een kunstgreep zijn van hunzelf.
Zou het dan zo laten.
eggie (2019-07-29 12:25:08+00:00): Zal wel door https://www.kippie.nl/kippie-dordrecht-centrum
komen. Die zitten op 14b.. Ook niet bekend bij Kadaster.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:53:32+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:53:41+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:53:56+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
ToniE (2019-07-29 12:19:46+00:00): Hallo Anwohner1,

so weit ich das nun gelesen habe, ist eigentlich doch nur der Kreuzungbereich Richtung Salmdorf betroffen, oder?

Ist denn die Feldkirchener Straße auf der gesamten Länge im Ortsgebiet für Motor-Fahrzeuge aller Art gesperrt, oder nur ein Teil?

Nach der jetzigen Lage kommen ich von Süden her nicht bis an die Weißenfelder Straße, und die ist doch als Umgehung ausgeschildert, oder?
Oder ist die Vaterstettener Straße ganz im Süden als Umgehung gedacht?

Bei motor_vehicle=no auf der geamten Länge dürfen dann auch die Anwohner/Kirchgänger/Friedhofsbesucher nicht rein? Wäre auf einem Teilstück dann motor_vehicle=destination besser?

Für "kurzzeitige" Sperrungen würde ich statt 

motor_vehicle=no

lieber

motor_vehicle:conditional=no @ (2019 Jun 29 - 2019 Oct 04)

setzen. Einige Navis verstehen das schon und man ist als Anwender nicht auf einen Update der Daten aufs Navi genau am 4. Oktober angewiesen. Das Problem mit motor_vehicle=no ist, dass diese Einstellung so lange gültig ist, bis das/die Navi(s) wieder mit neuen Daten gefüttert wird (Oktober, November, Dezember, ...).

OsmAnd z.B. holt sich neue Daten meist am 1. eines Monats und bietet sie den Anwendern so ab 10. eines Monats zum Download an. Die Freigabe der Baustelle hier liegt nun genau dazwischen ... und wird für die Anwender wohl erst ab 10. November wirksam sein.
Leider "versteht" OsmAnd "x:conditional" nicht - also irgendwie ist dann beides eine nicht optimale Lösung.

Siehe auch St 2079 zwischen Putzbrunn und "Beim Forstwirt" (bei Harthausen).

Viele  Grüße
Toni