piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Patr1k_P (2022-05-26 07:57:54+00:00): yes, that's what I meant...although they are the same, but we should stick to the licensing conditions and in Slovakia it is necessary to use this form
bordaben (2022-05-26 11:20:55+00:00): Okay, thanks for the clarification.
sektov (2022-05-26 14:39:22+00:00): This is decent mapping, thank you very much!
cRaIgalLAn (2022-05-26 17:05:58+00:00): Thank you for your kind support.
Patr1k_P (2022-05-26 10:35:24+00:00): nazdar, tuto cestu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063361839 ani tuto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1062347203 si nepripojil k dalsej ceste, takze by ani nefungovala navigacia...treba to pripajat

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063365291 toto je napr. prijazdova cesta k domu a skor by mala byt ako highway=service + service=driveway....track sa pouzivaju vacsinou ako lesne cesty a mimo obytnych zon....

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track

a tato https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063365849 by mala byt skor service....unclassified sa pouziva pri inych uceloch (spaja dve obce alebo osady, je to vedlajsia cesta)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=unclassified
eggie (2024-12-18 17:34:36+00:00): Hoi A67 A67

Deze mapper heeft nu weer wat veranderd, maar ik heb twijfels of het allemaal wel klopt.
Wegen worders 'links'en wegnummers worden aangepast. 
Bij vragen helaas geen overleg.
Kun jij nog even kijken.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ItaliA1delSole/history#map=5/46.75/9.40

MVG
eggie
A67-A67 (2024-12-18 18:09:50+00:00): Bedankt voor het doorgeven. Alle wijzigingen van deze mapper waren incorrect, dus ik heb ze allemaal teruggedraaid.
eggie (2024-12-18 18:19:58+00:00): Top 👍
Aerond (2022-05-28 08:01:41+00:00): Bra jobbat! 

Jag vill ändå rekommendera att du gör hela genomgången av hur man använder hemsidan för att redigera kartan, den visar viktiga saker som hur man gör byggnader fyrkantiga med Q knappen och annat som är bra att veta. :)

Du kan hitta den här: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/9/96/ID_Editor_Walkthrough.png

Om du har frågor så finns det en officiell discord med ett skandinaviskt chattrum. https://discord.gg/openstreetmap

Välkommen till OSM!
geoaria (2022-08-27 16:17:02+00:00): تگ  living_street در ایران وجود ندارد . لطفا از تگ های مثل residential  استفاده نماییدو دو خط را روی هم ترسیم نکنید
DP24PH (2022-05-25 00:32:53+00:00): Yikes! It seems that there's an issue between the trunk and the primary wherein primary has to be retained for most cases on all highways designated as the national primary outside the AH26 since bicycles are passing thru, and OSRM couldn't route on all trunk routes*.

Likewise, the only trunk classification could be more on highways that are passing thru AH26 nationwide.

Hopefully, this will help you a lot.


DP24

-----
* - currently known issue
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-05-27 19:32:34+00:00): Please, stop this massive classification changes. It's so rash. Not even a good justification. And what I’m seeing is align ing DPWH classification with OSM classification. They don't match. I'll revert.
hvalentim (2023-08-30 22:09:23+00:00): I beg to differ. These are trees classified as natural monuments; the name is relevant. Did you expect them to have personal names? "Joe, The Larch", maybe?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-30 23:26:52+00:00): Yes, name field for trees is for such names.

See say https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_individual_trees
WoodWoseWulf (2022-05-24 21:26:28+00:00): Hello, you created a park named New Cay here - were you trying to change the name of Allen Cay?
Webandsoftware (2022-05-26 19:38:12+00:00): Correct, the name is New Cay not Allen Cay.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-05-27 21:52:12+00:00): Hi Webandsoftware,

No worries, I can help you change it if you like.
Do you have a source or more information about the name change?
Webandsoftware (2022-06-03 16:00:05+00:00): Yes, will email you a government reference containing list of Cays.  What is your email address?
Also see Google map link https://www.google.com/maps/place/New+Cay/@23.719489,-76.1785342,15z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m5!3m4!1s0x8931ede4d6126247:0x9cdb4f9a282569!8m2!3d23.7174805!4d-76.1682299
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-04 23:14:27+00:00): Hi Webandsoftware,

Thanks for the information. Unfortunately, we can't use Google Maps as a source on OSM.

I will reach out to you via private message here so you can share the references you are using.
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-05-27 19:35:28+00:00): Reminder lang, di dapat ibinabase sa functional Class ng DPWH ang classification dito. Ngayon, dumami ang primary dito. Please stop!
OlasMapy (2026-02-20 19:37:27+00:00): everton doesn't play here anymore, a pub around the area has closed https://www.theguardian.com/football/when-saturday-comes-blog/2026/feb/18/the-soul-left-how-evertons-move-from-goodison-hurt-the-areas-pubs
b-jazz (2026-02-21 03:43:10+00:00): Thanks for the report. I can’t confirm these so I don’t typically make edits suggested in comments. Off you want to make the change yourself, please feel free. You can find more information at https://learnosm.org
seattlefyi (2022-05-25 01:35:47+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits! I restored the Stoneway Hardware node to keep the address info, but removed the business-specific tags from it based on your change.
Scott Smith (2022-06-07 21:56:09+00:00): Thanks so much! OSM noob here :)
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-05-27 19:29:41+00:00): Please be careful! 
3-digit highway number is not necessarily a good indicator of primary status. Between Pasig and Taguig, C-5 is better. To revert this and your other contentious Road classification changes.
zstadler (2022-05-26 05:32:11+00:00): Hello diledsys,

Thank you for joining OSM and your contribution.

Several buildings mapped in this edit have invalid geometries. Please see
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=34.85950&lat=31.54081&zoom=7&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way
for details.

Could you fix them?
kartonage (2022-05-31 07:25:35+00:00): I cleaned up a few issues (intersections; building nodes) with cs 121751852 but there were many many issues here with this changeset so there is need for more improvements.
zstadler (2022-05-31 07:32:58+00:00): Are there any problems other than un-tagged ways? They all seem to buildings?
kartonage (2022-05-31 07:39:49+00:00): I suppose just minor problems remain, like inaccuracies, overlapping features and connected objects and the mentioned un-tagged ways.
zstadler (2022-05-31 16:57:26+00:00): I've added the missing building tags, fixed open geometries, and removed irrelevant tags added to some nodes.
gusfak (2022-06-08 10:15:29+00:00): I would delete these geometries. They really suck!
zstadler (2022-06-08 13:04:54+00:00): Which geometries do you want to delete?
Why do they suck?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-28 00:48:45+00:00): Is the road already removed?
Kyle Gates (2022-06-02 13:40:26+00:00): Effectively, yes. It is closed now during construction and won't be reopened.
user_3022894 (2023-01-05 13:56:09+00:00): Hallo thschick,

gestatte mir einen kleinen Hinweis:
In Wülfrath-Aprath gehört an den Bahnsteigen dieses kleine "weiße Außenstück" am Rand der Bahnsteige - zum Gleis hin - auch noch mit zu den Bahnsteigen. Das ist die Bahnsteigkante. Ich hoffe, es ist daher okay, wenn ich noch ein paar kleinere Verfeinerungen vornehme.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
thschick (2023-01-05 15:04:55+00:00): Hallo Lukas,

ja, unbedingt! Ich hatte es nur nach dem Luftbild gemappt und bin schon länger nicht mehr dort ausgestiegen.

Viele Grüße
Thomas
user_3022894 (2023-04-20 06:32:22+00:00): Hallo Thomas,

alles klar, danke für die Antwort!

LG
MaGIStokrat (2022-05-24 21:37:59+00:00): Ja wie jetzt?
Dürfen die Fzg. doch alle fahren, oder änderst Du das alles nur aus dem Bauch heraus?
Und es war übr. kein Fehler, sondern einfach nur unvollständig getaggt mit den erlaubten Vehikeln.
Allenfalls ist foot=yes bei sidewalk=both ein Widerspruch.
Dass das Parken da nicht mehr erlaubt ist, sollte mE auch mit rein.
Da musst du nochmal ran, wenn du es schon angefangen hast. So ist's halt eben auch nicht der aktuelle Stand.

Gruß MaGIStokrat
Fabian1429 (2022-05-25 10:38:52+00:00): Ich habe davon nur durch die Presse mitbekommen.
Ich weiß auch nicht, wie ich das dort eintragen soll, dass dort auch ÖPNV, Polizei usw. langfahren darf.

Gruß Fabian1429
DP24PH (2022-05-25 00:19:40+00:00): Hi! You may have a global changeset, and to avoid inconvenience to local mappers, kindly split into per country basis since every Local OpenStreetMap Communities have different editing guidelines. Thank you very much!


DP24
Allison P (2022-05-25 00:36:19+00:00): Saw this coming. I don't think it's a good use of my time highlighting a few churches, hitting upload, then undownloading them and repeating with all 101 of them. I did it before with a similar edit, and it felt very unproductive.
opendcc (2022-05-25 13:11:20+00:00): Hello,
please consider the overall productivity of ALL users, not only your personal productivity. Thank you.
Kuatsystems (2022-05-26 00:07:20+00:00): thanks so much for doing this, I have seen your work on here, and it's much appreciated
DavidKarlas (2022-05-26 02:54:08+00:00): Maybe tooling(in this case JOSM) should have ability to auto-split/separate changeset into chunks of 10kmX10km squares changesets...
wkdgs (2022-05-25 15:49:57+00:00): Die Kneipe liegt außerhalb des Gebäudes. Ist das richtig so?

Falls nicht, könntest du den Punkt ins Gebäude verschieben und ein "entrance=main" hinzufügen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121443616
gusfak (2022-06-05 17:14:47+00:00): Please don't use a generic and meaningless changeset comment
bxl-forever (2022-05-24 23:19:35+00:00): Hello,

Some advice here:

(1) If you make changes in Kortrijk and in Brussels, please upload your changes in one city _before_ doing the other.

(2) Never draw buildings from aerial imagery.  "AIV Flanders" imagery is for roads (in Flanders).
For buildings, use "AIV Flanders GRB" (but exercice common sense because official government data can be outdated or wrong, that happens).

(3) This road is very strange, it looks like you drew a line but provided no tags for it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063395923
I guess you want to add tags that say this is a (private) road.  The best way is to look at how existing roads nearby are tagged and use the same tags.

(4) I fixed the building in Brussels because you drew it across the railway line, which was obviously impossible.
Leo Slager (2022-05-27 12:19:31+00:00): De turn_restrictions op de PrinsHendrikkade bestaan uit 2 elementen. Dat levert dus een foutmelding op. Er zijn volgens de wiki  3 elementen nodig:
from
to
via

ik pas het even aan.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-24 20:21:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 111507986, 111508422.
Glassman (2022-05-26 00:38:26+00:00): #TIP: The access=no on the trail will likely prevent routers from using it. If the trail is open to the public, just remove the access=no tag.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121444446
ivanbranco (2022-12-09 17:03:32+00:00): Ciao Duro,

sei sicuro sia a pagamento (fee=yes)?

"queste bellissime terme libere sono infatti assolutamente gratis! Non si paga il grande parcheggio e non si paga l’ingresso alle piscine naturali, cosa chiedere di più??!" (source: https://www.tuttosaturnia.com/cascate-del-mulino/prezzi-e-info/)

"Le terme naturali di Saturnia sono aperte tutto l’anno, 24 ore al giorno, e l’ingresso è gratuito!" (source: https://www.cascate-del-mulino.info/#:~:text=Le%20Cascate%20del%20Mulino,-Un%20luogo%20magico&text=Le%20terme%20naturali%20di%20Saturnia,e%20l'ingresso%20%C3%A8%20gratuito!) ecc.ecc.

"L’accesso alle Cascate del Mulino è completamente gratuito ogni giorno ed ogni ora dell’anno. Non è richiesto infatti alcun biglietto, né alcuna prenotazione." (source: https://www.scorcidimondo.it/terme-di-saturnia-cascate-del-mulino-prezzi-aperture-e-orari-toscana/)
ivanbranco (2022-12-09 17:06:20+00:00): e perchè "Molino" invece di "Mulino"?

"cascate del mulino" saturnia 
95.500 risultati su Google

"cascate del molino" saturnia
Circa 4.790 risultati su Google

anche tutte le fonti citate prima usano "Mulino" invece di "Molino"
Đuro Jiří (2022-12-09 19:34:53+00:00): Saluti Ivan,
ingresso è libero 24 ore,365 giorni all'anno (ogni quarto anno 366 giorni).
Sinceramente non ricordo perché ho messo che è a pagamento, probabilmente solo per errore. Adesso ho corretto.
"Molino" ho messo, perciò sulla strada d'accesso sono due cartelli sul quali è scritto "Molino" con "o".
Confermo che anche io ho trovato più fonti sul internet dov'è scritto "Mulino" con "u". 
In Croazia abbiamo uno proverbio, vulgare,per questo motivo scrivo solo significativo. 
Non è vero tutto che c'è scritto.
Secondo me, nome è in dialetto.
Dawid2849 (2026-06-20 20:41:45+00:00): Częstotliwość 15000 Hz?
Dawid2849 (2026-06-27 21:15:45+00:00): Naprawiłem
highflyer74 (2022-05-25 21:01:29+00:00): Moin Christoph!

Nur zur Info: das Hinzufügen von addr:country=* ist in Deutschland nicht notwendig, da wir großflächig Grenzrelationen haben, die das Tag überflüssig machen. Insofern verbessert man damit nichts.

Viele Grüße aus HB!
jleedev (2022-05-24 20:59:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
VA00 (2022-06-26 09:28:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173990283

Teren wielokrotnie przeorany, napierw kładli rurociąg, potem LP wycinka. NA przyszłość proszę KONIECZNIE przed dodaniem tego typu tworów zrobić wizję lokalną  na miejscu osobiście.
Lejun (2022-05-25 09:36:36+00:00): Merci de la contribution, je me charge de reprendre les établissements scolaires.
mcliquid (2024-04-16 13:04:13+00:00): Deine Stahlschneebrücken sind hier alle doppelt. Da waren schon welche aus 2016/2019. Macht das Sinn die doppelt zu haben?
Hungerburg (2024-04-17 09:04:50+00:00): Musste suchen, alle scheint mir übertrieben, aber hier gefunden https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063405664 - da waren schon  in der Standardansicht "unsichtbare", ja. Gibt es noch mehr wo anders?
mcliquid (2024-04-17 09:41:22+00:00): Ich möchte nicht versprechen, dass ich alle ausgewählt habe, aber dass hier sind die aus meiner Sicht bereits vorhandenen gewesenen:
way 431790832
way 431790813
way 431790838
way 431790845
way 431790850
way 431790810
way 431790404
way 431790829
way 431790852
way 431790831
way 431790408
way 431790839
way 431790826
way 431790846
way 431790847
way 431790844
way 431790823
way 431790827
way 431790840
way 431790853
way 431790849
way 431790835
way 431790819
way 431790837
way 431790815
way 431790811
way 431790818
way 431790843
way 431790841
way 431790851
way 431790828
way 431790833
way 431790812
way 431790816
way 431790414
way 431790406
way 431790411
way 431790825
way 431790409
way 431790412
way 431790407
way 431790405
way 431790413
way 431790830
way 431790415
way 431790417
Hungerburg (2024-04-17 10:38:27+00:00): Danke, die 33 sind alle am Arlberg, ich werde die von mir doppelt angelegten wegtun.
Hungerburg (2024-04-17 15:59:25+00:00): Es waren 46 alte und von den 28 neuen von mir waren 11 Verdoppelungen. Danke fürs genaue Hinschauen! Ich war so frei die alten in der Standardansicht sichtbar zu machen, und so sind die ja auch ersterfasst worden.
mcliquid (2024-04-18 13:00:17+00:00): Danke dir!
Gustavo22Soares (2022-09-03 09:20:54+00:00): pfvr use a tecla Q do teclado para deixar os edifícios com ângulos retos e use somente as tags necessárias
user_5359 (2022-05-31 16:44:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1063408287, https://www.osm.org/way/1063408288. Why did you add the rounded height value?
VLD270 (2022-05-31 22:01:09+00:00): Thank you for bringing that to my attention. A correction has been made and the redundant information has been removed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121446025
jeslop (2022-05-25 11:37:37+00:00): Hola AntonioLago. Aquí se te olvidó la etiqueta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063408340

Y también estaría bien que comentases los conjuntos de cambios: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

Saludos y gracias por tus aportaciones

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Falsernet (2022-11-03 18:41:05+00:00): In what way were the exit names misleading?
Glassman (2022-05-26 00:40:22+00:00): I would recommend combining the two nodes into one to save all the info.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121447180
bxl-forever (2022-05-24 22:57:32+00:00): Hello,

You might want to use other techniques than dumping GTFS data to OSM, especially if you want to use the "ref" tag which already serves other purposes.  I’d be happy to look for alternative solutions with you.

We did that in the past but changed our mind because doing so massively corrupted data.

STIB/MIVB’s stop numbers are not valid primary keys for databases, they change too frequently.  If a stop is relocated a few meters away, it will get a suffix (3088A becomes 3088B).  If a stop is renamed—that is happening frequently, e.g. with the push for more female names—the numbers changes completely.

Could we please discuss this first?

Have a nice day.
Tchet (2022-05-25 13:38:31+00:00): Hi, I'm not really "dumping" any info, merely just adding the "ref" (or should it be "ref:IBXL" ?). I'm planning to automaticaly reconcialte the two datasources (I'm build a huge ETL anyway), so changes will be tracked.

I just wanted a minimal set of data in before going further. This editing is about the places around my office so I know this neighborhood very well.

I would be pleased to go to some meetup but there's no emergy, I will put it on hold until this happens.

Greetings
bxl-forever (2022-05-25 14:14:22+00:00): OK, good point, thanks for clarifying.

If it’s just about adding the ref number in one dedicated tag without touching geometries or other tags, it is fine.

"ref:STIB_MIVB" is the appropriate key to store this data.  I will endeavour to make sure data is properly filled in this area.
abakus_uploader (2022-05-24 22:31:05+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-05-25 22:31:24+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
AntMadeira (2022-05-24 22:49:24+00:00): Olá, Rafael.
Sê bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap!

Vi que alteraste a EM 555 de terciária para residencial. Em que te baseaste para o fazer?

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
Rafael Lopes Francisco (2022-05-25 08:04:31+00:00): Boas,
A minha motivação foi mudar para o mesmo tipo da estrada que vem do lado do Prado e da Cruz de Ferro, tendo em conta que são o mesmo tipo de rua antes e depois da rotunda até à bifurcação um pouco depois da subida para a serra. Até ai ainda é uma zona habitacional com nome de rua, no entanto talvez deva ficar só Rua Residencial até onde existe nome de rua, passando a ser terciária a partir do momento em que é apenas EM 555 ?
AntMadeira (2022-05-25 11:19:08+00:00): Obrigado pelo teu retorno.

Existe uma padronização das estradas nacionais que te aconselho a ler [1].
Fiz a pergunta porque esta região ainda não foi "padronizada" e não conheço essa zona a sudoeste da Lousã para poder opinar, só consultando as minhas cábulas.
No entanto, sendo uma EM com ligação entre povoações, não pode ser uma residencial. Aconselho-te a leres a página wiki e, se tiveres dúvidas, terei todo o gosto em discuti-las contigo, pois sou eu que estou mais responsável por essa área.
Além disso, também tens o canal Telegram da comunidade portuguesa OSM [2], onde poderás colocar outras dúvidas e participar nas discussões que vamos tendo por lá. Toda a ajuda é bem-vinda!

Cumprimentos,
António.

[1] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Portugal/Padroniza%C3%A7%C3%A3o#Estradas
[2] - https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Rafael Lopes Francisco (2022-05-25 13:20:14+00:00): Obrigado pela ajuda ! Então para já não vou estar a alterar o tipo de estradas enquanto não houver um padrão para esta região.
AntMadeira (2022-05-25 20:23:50+00:00): Na verdade, a padronização existe e aplica-se a todo o território.
O que eu quis dizer foi que ainda não se fez a revisão das estradas do concelho da Lousã. No entanto, as regras estão em vigor e, como referi em cima, uma estrada municipal não pode ser residencial, deve ser secundária ou, no mínimo, terciária.
Hans Thompson (2022-05-25 16:56:53+00:00): Hi. You've added some nice edits. One small reversion I made is to remove the name from this rink.  The name described the function but isn't a proper name. I hope that makes sense. Thanks.
Glassman (2022-05-26 00:34:33+00:00): I noticed you corrected Windrunner99 edit. Can I convince you to send them a message explaining why you reverted their work? Thanks
Wilmer Osario (2022-06-03 11:19:00+00:00): ¿Por qué marca las calles de los barrios con la etiqueta [access=no]?

Siguen siendo calles de acceso público, por lo que ésta etiqueta es indebida.
wireguy (2022-05-25 13:40:14+00:00): bgo_eiu,  when you removed the monster industrial area, you may have taken a section of a monster residential area.  Now that residential landuse is unclosed, relation 9353389.   Can you take a look?
wkdgs (2022-05-25 15:44:46+00:00): Beim Tag "class:bicycle" ist dir ein Semikolon reingerutscht :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121449561
wkdgs (2022-05-25 15:46:34+00:00): Bei den anderen Änderungssätzen auch
risturiz (2022-05-25 16:15:48+00:00): Disculpa Alejandra, pudieses explicar un poco mejor la cantidad de nodos borrados? Muchas gracias.
MxxCon (2022-05-25 03:06:15+00:00): Bowery Bay Sub? submarine? subway? subbase? subnet?😉
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121451472
Warin61 (2022-05-25 23:25:26+00:00): Hi,
Way 1063443320, tagged highway=footway, layer=-1...
looks like it goes through buildings ? and from the layer=-1 is underground? 
Possibly the building conflict is that the building are drawn to the roof outline not the building foot print which is usually smaller.
Ydgfb (2022-05-26 00:56:24+00:00): Hi. You're correct, the roof of the building extends over the path. If there is a better way to present this, I am very open to learning it.
Warin61 (2022-05-26 12:28:43+00:00): 
1 .. the buildings can be reduced .. looks like the roof detail shows the eves .. so use that for the building foot print? 

2 indicate that the path is covered .ll covered=yes IIRC. The path will have to be separated into sections so only those bits that are covered carry the tag. 

You can get more complicated with building part roof, layer=1 too .. but I don't think that is worth the time.. at least at the moment.