piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cm8 (2015-01-07 06:38:10+00:00): siehe auch
https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-de%40openstreetmap.org/msg07274.html

und
https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-de%40openstreetmap.org/msg75315.html

und
https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-de%40openstreetmap.org/msg85308.html

und
https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-de%40openstreetmap.org/msg106585.html

-> Die Nutzung von highway=pedestrian für Bereiche, die keine Fußgängerzonen darstellen ist umstritten.  Das Wiki schließt eine weitere Verwendung zwar nicht hart aus, behandelt das Tag aber im Kern im Zshg. mit Vz 242.

-> Nicht so die Nutzung von highway=footway area=yes für Bereiche die Fußgängern vorbehalten sind (sogar unabhängig von der Beschilderung vor Ort), siehe insbes. dritten mailing-list-link.
GerdP (2015-11-10 10:11:57+00:00): please review ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320759609 
and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320759628
If you call those links, I think they should be tagged primary_link, not residential_link. On Bing they also look like oneways.
Polarbear (2015-10-17 11:08:55+00:00): Hallo, du hast beim Editieren der Kreuzung auch die Strassennamen der Mittelstücke entfernt, geschah das absichtlich? Ich nehme in solchen Situationen immer den Namen der abgehenden Strasse, um die Navigation zu unterstützen.
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-02-27 04:55:33+00:00): Hi katpatuka:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320770968#map=13/5.1051/101.0284 , for this way, what I know from my experience in mapping Indonesia, It's rare to see a major road particularly secondary and upper (primary-trunk) has a dead end node. I just wanna make sure if this case is actually fine in Malaysia. to be clear, this way has code ref, wide road, good surfaces, and has a dead end segment on the south at Kampung Beng. Is it fine to tag it as secondary road ? thank you
katpatuka (2020-02-27 07:11:36+00:00): Some time has past since I last edited in Malaysia - so I'm not up to date with the subject ;) The way id you gave has been edited 26 times by different users; the second part to Kampung Beng starting from the crossing over to Kota Tampan I'd say looks like a tertiary. 

Google Maps lets the A167 end near Kamping Bukit Sapi; I do not have knowledge where the all the refs come from and if there is possibly reference data on data.gov.my and ...
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-02-28 03:18:14+00:00): Ah I see... thank you for your confirmation. Agree, with that.
_al (2015-01-09 11:07:48+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetmap!
Danke fürs Eintragen der Wege.
Weiterhin viel Spaß mit OSM.
Servus, Andreas
smaprs (2015-01-07 15:07:49+00:00): Hello Fred, thank you for your contributions in Brazil. I just realized that those rivers don't fit well in the satellite image, so I tried to adjust it.
voschix (2015-01-09 16:46:55+00:00): What is the source for the two big relations 4452767 and 4452701?
joecow (2015-01-09 16:50:58+00:00): Bing aerial imagery
ToniE (2015-01-07 10:46:32+00:00): Hi Tobi,

die Adresse Haidgraben 1 (way 38302257) gibt es tatsächlich zwei Mal. Erst kürzlich wieder bei enem Spaziergang geprüft.

Gruß,
Toni
eggie (2018-03-25 07:33:44+00:00): Na jaren weer gaan mappen.. daarom... opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
naoliv (2015-05-25 22:29:28+00:00): sere_inpe, you have wrongly downgraded some highway links in this and other changesets.
For example, a way entering or leaving a motorway should be motorway_link (like it was before) and not tertiary_link
trigpoint (2015-01-09 15:35:07+00:00): What is the source of this changeset?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320791775 is certainly incorrect, I do no believe that you walked this line, the PROW does not cross the bypass, but joins Alkington Road via the lane leading to the farm.
Nakaner (2015-02-03 13:53:09+00:00): Fährt die Schöneicher-Rüdersdorfer Straßenbahn nicht nach BOStrab, sondern nach BOSStrab? :-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171091369/history
Richtig wäre workrules=DE:BOStrab
Polarbear (2015-06-26 13:39:15+00:00): Hallo Bot45715, nach meinen ersten Recherchen soll von dem Bunker https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320801275 nor noch das Portal existieren? Dann sollten wir den tag z.B. auf razed:building aendern.
ndm (2015-01-07 22:53:30+00:00): Not entirely convinced this is a great improvement -- a lot has disappeared (missing "building=yes"). The "front-line" doesn't look very straight?
ndm (2015-01-08 00:14:21+00:00): Ok, looks like Bing imagery has shifted since I sketched it -- I'll add the building tags and hopefully a few improvements :-)
Alexxrr (2015-01-08 09:28:28+00:00): Hi
I hope it's all right now.
I just wanted to name the new pub Kongs, and ensure that it and the King William were correctly shown as extending through to Little King Street.
I keep forgetting about ensuring I've set building=yes . I'll try remember that for future edits.
Warin61 (2018-10-11 00:46:53+00:00): Hi,
On Way: 320802992 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
trigpoint (2015-01-07 14:27:21+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Are the charging points really in the middle of the car parks? I would have expected them to be near a wall.
It would be useful to add the level they are on to enable users to find them easily .
yuryleb (2015-01-16 21:43:23+00:00): Простите, вы в курсе, что все космоснимки более и менее смещены относительно реальности и привязку дорог следует делать исключительно по трекам, благо на месте Большого проспекта, зачем-то вами искривленного, их предостаточно. Большая просьба выпрямить проспект обратно
neuhausr (2015-02-06 15:44:07+00:00): From spot checking, it looks like you tagged many of these roads' maxspeed twice
neanderthaler (2015-01-07 15:54:46+00:00): Parkplatzfläche neu festgelegt (Baustelle)
Benoi (2015-01-07 15:49:28+00:00): Changement de la rue de la mare bouchée, qui se prolonge par un escalier.
neanderthaler (2015-01-07 15:52:46+00:00): Name ergänzt.
user_5359 (2015-01-08 07:54:59+00:00): bitte keine beschreibende Namen verwenden. Siehe auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#Altglascontainer
dexterslu (2015-01-07 16:04:17+00:00): Oops, wrong comment here - the address was updated to the correct address. Verified by Wayne County/City of Detroit Assessors Record.
Brandon Peterson (2015-01-07 16:22:57+00:00): This is where I live - a lot of the prior "roads" were actually cattle trails or private driveways, not public roads. There are a lot of other problems in the area but for now I'm just correcting my neighborhood.
Daniel Chu (2020-10-21 12:52:59+00:00): 一線生機
Nakaner (2016-06-01 22:09:55+00:00): What are the differences between Weißer Stein–Lindenbaum and Weißer Stein–Heddernheim which make you change the tagging from railway=light_rail to railway=subway?

I myself have been there (it is about 3 years ago but I still remember good enough). There are no significant differences.

All your changes in Frankfurt am Main seem to be done without local knowledge and without knowing the definition used for railway=light_rail in Germany. Pleae also watch (and understand) this video: https://youtu.be/_5hkR-IAnwQ?t=1m25s

I hereby ask you to revert your changes. (If I do it, I will not care if you have done any useful contributions at these changesets)
Nakaner (2016-07-07 18:48:36+00:00): manually reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40551501
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-06 10:09:28+00:00): Hi, ich weiß, es ist lange her, aber mal ein kleiner Hinweis: 
Du hast hier agricultural= und forestry=yes gesetzt. Vermutlich in der Absicht "land- und forstwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei" zu taggen.
Das ist leider nicht richtig. 
Agricultural=yes ist "Traktor frei"
Forestry=yes existiert gar nicht.
Korrekt wäre Access=agricultural;forestry (häufig motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry)
Ist im Wiki auch unter "Häufiger Fehler" angegeben.
Ist kein großes Ding, doch vielleicht hilft es dir, weitere fehlerhafte Tags zu vermeiden.
Würde mich auch freuen, wenn du es in deinen bisherigen Tags nach und nach korrigierst.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320836791
Grüße 
Geo-Tobi
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-06 10:15:54+00:00): Hinweis: das zieht sich über den gesamten Feldweg bis hierhin: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98626484
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-16 22:07:00+00:00): Esse é o nome da pista mesmo? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320844954
kayle (2015-01-08 07:10:50+00:00): Ahoj, vitaj v OSM. Na úvod malá poznámka, ak ulica nemá názov nepíš do name "unnamed yet". Keď bude pomenovaná, potom sa pridá meno. Ako poznámku že ešte nemá meno môžeš napr. pridať tag "note=zatiaľ bez názvu".
Max-SK (2015-01-08 07:13:24+00:00): Dík za tip, nechcel som tam dávať nič ale bez názvu ma to nechcelo pustiť ďalej.
kayle (2015-01-08 07:16:09+00:00): Hmm.. pozerám že používaš JOSM, ten síce "kričí" ak nie je názov na ulici, ale to je len varovanie. A malo by ťa to pustiť.
Max-SK (2015-01-08 07:22:02+00:00): Skúšal som najprv tie in-browser editory ale nevedel som sa dopracovať k vlozeniu gpx do mapy. Zatiaľ sú to len pokusy, učím sa na vlastnej ulici :)
cadsauxk (2015-01-08 00:09:22+00:00): Por favor evite edições sem acrescentar comentários descritivos.
cadsauxk (2015-02-14 11:36:09+00:00): Estruturas desativadas pode ser marcadas como "disused:aerodrome", ou "abadonded:aerodrom", não há necessidade de incluir isto no nome. Estradas de terra não devem ser marcadas como "track" à exceção de trilhas agrícolas.
eggie (2017-03-31 20:15:12+00:00): Beter laat dan nooit...
 "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
dforsi (2015-01-10 09:33:48+00:00): Perché hai eliminato Via Monte Grappa e l'hai sostituita con una strada senza nome? E non hai collegato la nuova strada a Via Molino di sotto. Il commento del changeset serve per spiegare queste e altre cose che non sono ovvie a chi non abita là.
nico93 (2015-01-10 14:38:15+00:00): ma dove
cadsauxk (2015-01-08 00:20:34+00:00): O que isto tem a ver com o "Condomínio Santos Dumond" ?
chillly (2016-02-15 20:29:05+00:00): I see you have mapped Brantingham Thorpe Park as leisure=park. I don't think this is correct. This may be parkland, but it's not a park. leisure=park implies public access, usually municipal. This is parkland, so it's really farmland - it's probably used to graze animals.

HTH
cadsauxk (2015-01-08 00:21:34+00:00): Isto não tem nada a ver com "Condomínio Santos Dumond".
Nakaner (2015-04-16 11:57:16+00:00): Kann das Signal wirklich nur Hp0 (ein oder zwei rote Lichter) anzeigen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3275115358/history
cadsauxk (2015-01-08 00:14:29+00:00): Você apagou os dados anteriores pela segunda vez, porque?
cadsauxk (2015-01-08 00:17:57+00:00): Revertido pela segunda vez. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27988089
luiswoo (2015-01-07 21:50:32+00:00): power=station -- это электростанция,
должно быть power=substation 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:power%3Dsubstation
Vladimir Tyurin (2015-01-07 22:48:29+00:00): Спасибо!
_al (2015-01-09 11:32:41+00:00): Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Servus, Andreas
Peter Dobratz (2015-01-10 00:13:47+00:00): Thanks.
lks1[konto usunięte] (2015-01-07 22:27:01+00:00): To co usunąłeś to jest słupek pikietażowy. Przywróciłem. Tu jest strona na wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway=milestone?uselang=pl
fgouget (2024-07-06 18:23:44+00:00): Hi,

In this changeset you marked this track with service=siding but I suspect what you meant is service=yard. The same goes for the other nearby tracks.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130149683

Apparently the OpenStreetMap terminology differs from the UK usage.

Cheers,
cm8 (2015-01-07 22:40:45+00:00): - access=private taggen, wenn es so weit ist
- Warnungen vor dem Hunde am besten vor Ort aufstellen, nicht in OSM..
Piz Pachific (2015-01-07 23:24:20+00:00): fix overlapping building (Osmose) (JOSM oder OSM machte eine Verwechslung, weil ich 2 Changesets innerhalb kurzer Zeit gespeichert habe)
Hendrik75 (2015-01-14 04:33:03+00:00): Bonjour, Merci pour le rajout des nouvelle bretelles sur l'(ex)péage de Tina!
Il y avait juste une petite erreur dans la mesure où les bretelles n'étaient pas connectées à la route principale sur leur extrémités. Ainsi, un calcul d'itinéraire n'aurait pas été possible. 
J'ai corrigé la chose ici: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28127477 
Essayes d'utiliser l'éditeur JOSM plutôt que l'éditeur en ligne Potlach? C'est bien plus précis à utiliser et donne de meilleurs résultats: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/
Bonne continuation et n'hésites pas à poser des questions en cas de doute. Eventuellement sur la liste de discussion calédonienne https://lists.openstreetmap.org/options/talk-nc
ou française https://lists.openstreetmap.org/options/talk-fr 
Cordialement
Hendrik
emacsen (2015-01-09 12:30:39+00:00): You're adding a lot of parks in this and subsequent changesets. What is your source for this data?
monkeyrobot (2015-01-09 17:49:29+00:00): As a resident I have local knowledge of the area, but these parks are also mapped in documents on the NYC Parks Dept Website as well as the National Parks Service Gateway National Recreation Area website. Land which is owned by the park service and designated for development in their master plan for the area but not yet developed nor open to the public has been tagged as "proposed".
emacsen (2015-01-12 12:51:41+00:00): Can you please specify the sources you're using and make useful changeset comments?

The comments would be the part when you hit Save in iD, and I'm fairly sure you can set the sources there too.

This is important, especially when using third party resources to map.
q_hung (2015-01-08 10:03:07+00:00): Cám ơn nhé!
Kilkenni (2015-05-20 23:27:36+00:00): Стоянка №20 - не здание, а отдельные здания-гаражи, т.е. до правки было правильно. Вернул ;)
KnMoon (2015-01-08 03:33:53+00:00): BRT「仁愛醫院」站更名為「第二市場/仁愛醫院」站
KathleenMM (2015-01-08 04:37:52+00:00): Added Skamokawa, WA business
Greg_Rose (2021-06-21 16:17:34+00:00): I see you're still mapping - since this change is from 6 years ago I understand if your memory is blank on this... but you named a hiking/biking trail "Canl" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/209973143). Any idea what the name was meant to be? Thanks in advance...
Greg_Rose (2021-06-21 16:39:33+00:00): I think I just figured it out. Not CANL, it's "Can I".
aceman444 (2021-10-26 14:52:00+00:00): Zdravim, tie cesticky ako https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221441062 maju naozaj take dlhe nazvy? Je k tomu nejaky oficialny zdroj? Alebo su to len ich opisy. Do nazvu 'name' totiz patria len skutocne mena objektov, vlastne mena, nie opisy ani vyjadrenie typu objektu (napr. name=cesta).
Mashin (2021-10-26 15:05:30+00:00): Urcite nie su oficialne
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/16135182
Hjart (2016-09-21 18:43:24+00:00): Bemærk at grusbelagte veje ikke bør klassificeres tracktype=grade1 (se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype). grade1 bruges ved asfalt eller tilsvarende hård overflade.
b-holdet (2016-09-21 18:47:26+00:00): Wikien skriver:
Usually a paved or heavily compacted hardcore surface.
Hvilket er en fast overflade, ikke nødvendigvis med asfalt.
Og det er disse veje.
Hjart (2016-09-21 18:54:11+00:00): Jeg vil mene det i DK er de færreste mark/skovveje der lever op til betegnelsen "heavily compacted hardcore surface" og hvis de i perioder gør det, skal man altid regne med at de i andre perioder kan være kørt op af tungt maskineri. Derfor vil jeg aldrig klassificere dem grade1.
GOwin (2015-04-22 03:12:10+00:00): Hi chatt980.

You might want to reconsider how you're tagging commercial areas.  If they've been tagged as "landuse=commercial", it would be redundant, and therefore not necessary to put in "commercial establishment" in the name tag.

The name tag is appropriate if the actual establishment's name is specified, (e.g. "Mang Andok's Chicken Inasal", etc.)
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:39:08+00:00): Ways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320939573,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320939575
have no tags. What are they?
golyanitskiy (2015-01-08 09:30:18+00:00): не забывай у зданий углы выпрямлять, а то кривые выходят :)
bhav_ana (2018-12-21 04:39:45+00:00): Hi Hayrin,
Please check this way ID
way 320942953 marked as track 
But as per road quality this can be service road.
Please suggest if it is other wise
dforsi (2015-01-10 09:37:14+00:00): "gidinetti" mi sembra un errore e anche l'uso delle minuscole sia per i parco che per la chiesa
Takuto (2015-07-03 07:40:49+00:00): Уточните пожалуйста, по какой улице нижний дом №6
Zelgadis (2015-07-03 07:43:44+00:00): На нём не указано, только номер. Возможно там есть какая-то "виртуальная улица" к которой он принадлежит.
Takuto (2015-07-03 07:55:51+00:00): Улица должна быть, в городах редко бывают дома без улицы. Скорее всего табличка старая. Я в таких случаях пишу ключ note=табличка без улицы (ну или что-то вроде того) чтобы другие мапперы не путались.
Zelgadis (2015-07-03 07:57:12+00:00): Я не спорю что улица есть, но на доме таблички с ней нет, только номер дома.
Takuto (2015-07-03 08:09:54+00:00): Так и я не требую приписать какую-нибудь произвольную. Просто из тэгов дома не видно что там такая табличка без улицы, а кажется что просто забыли проставить. Не принимайте близко к сердцу.
Zelgadis (2015-07-03 08:10:33+00:00): ок :)
freeExec (2015-01-09 18:37:58+00:00): Строение в адресе указывается как "с№"
kartler175 (2015-01-10 17:19:16+00:00): Warum hier einfach neue Wege über schon bestehende legen, anstatt der Eigenschaften anzupassen?

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=12.75932&lat=46.82526&zoom=18&opacity=1.00&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-08 13:50:27+00:00): I thought I went over with you that the Blvd of the Allies was only secondary after PA-885 left it. :P
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-08 14:01:57+00:00): As for Braddock Avenue, I'll give you it as primary, but only between PA-8 & I-376.  South of the Parkway, I think it should have stayed as secondary.
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-08 14:09:57+00:00): As for Fifth Ave, why stop @ Halket Street?  If it's really primary, I would think it would make it to the ramp to PA-885 (Boulevard of the Allies), and then change back to secondary there.
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-08 14:18:27+00:00): As for O'Hara Street, you have to admit, that looks like a really weird place to end a secondary road at.  Think it probably should have stayed as a territory highway instead.
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-08 14:22:44+00:00): Now with Centre Avenue, that's also a weird place for it to change classifications.  Maybe we should just upgrade Centre all the way Downtown to 6th? Agree?
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-08 14:38:50+00:00): Now, with Murray Avenue, why just turn a small segment into tertiary?  I think that could have been easily upgraded all the way to Wilkins Ave.
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-08 14:39:33+00:00): Ok, I think I'm done. lol.  I'll be awaiting your response. :)
abbafei (2015-01-09 03:36:43+00:00): Blvd of Allies: sounds vaguely familiar; did not remember though. secondary sounds ok -- I was debating with myself whether it warrants being a primary.

Braddock: ok; sounds good to me. I know when the Sq Hill Tunnel was closed, they used north of the Parkway as an alternate route, and it generally gets a good bit of traffic, etc., therefore I primarilized it.

Fifth: made it primary there mainly because it is a "buddy" road to Forbes while passing through the university area, it is not really until after the Birmingham Brg that it becomes a lot smaller, but i suppose stopping at Blvd of Allies ramp makes sense , especially given that traffic-splitting thing by Robinson Street intersection (which shows priority there).

Ohara: was really unsure where to stop it; i guess stopping at Bigelow makes some sense. i think it is in shadyside where it (as Bayard) especially warrants secondary status, thats why i secondarized any of it in the 1st place.

Centre: yes, wanted to do that in the same commit all the way to town, along with Herron at least until the Bigelow intersection; figured I would leave it to be done another time though. can do it now though.

Murray: I suppose that makes sense; it is akin to Wightman north of Forbes, however there is no traffic light where it ends at Wilkins (as opposed to where Wightman meets Wilkins). But I suppose it could still be a tertiary at least to Northumberland, and even to its end (bikers use it a good bit, since it's one of the few flat roads in the area going in that general alignment).

Changing these right now :-)
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-09 03:52:11+00:00): Well, the only reason I mentioned Murray Avenue is because of the solid yellow line all the way up to Wilkins.  Usually, that means it's normally a tertiary highway unless it's a highway into a business park (normally 'unclassified' unless it's a thru route).
rickmastfan67 (2015-01-09 03:54:54+00:00): As for the Blvd of Allies, it was when in the past you upgraded it all the way to trunk. There should be a message somewhere in your Inbox where we talked about it and agreed to put it back to secondary. :)
aceman444 (2015-01-08 20:02:23+00:00): Dakujem za opravu cisel. Neviete kde je cislo 18?
Daniel Chu (2020-10-21 12:52:27+00:00): 虎吼石河
Daniel Chu (2020-10-21 12:52:39+00:00): 嘉頓山
user_5359 (2022-04-10 13:34:05+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1871301168/history (one of five objects). Did you mean ref instead of highwayidx?
cadsauxk (2015-01-08 15:48:35+00:00): O Condomínio não possui vias internas? Você pode mapeá-las como highway=service e access=private
freeExec (2015-01-09 18:01:46+00:00): Не рисуйте дубликаты, все их приходиться удалять, вместо полезной работы занимаемся мартышкиным трудом.
cadsauxk (2015-01-08 15:46:38+00:00): A ligação foi extinta de maneira completa, ou só para carros? Por exemplo, se ainda puder ser usada por pedestres o ideal é trocar por footway ao invés de apagar. Lembre-se que o OSM não é apenas para veículos.
luiswoo (2015-01-13 07:09:31+00:00): не плохо было бы комментировать правки, и совсем хорошо, давать ссылку, откуда дровишки...
http://www.donnews.ru/V-Proletarskom-rayone-Rostova-poyavitsya-esche-odna-ulitsa-s-odnostoronnim-dvizheniem_17710
cadsauxk (2015-01-08 15:38:03+00:00): "Escola" e "Terreno da Escola"  não são nomes, são descrições.
cadsauxk (2015-01-08 15:42:02+00:00): Corrigido: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27999440
ViriatoLusitano (2015-01-12 03:04:03+00:00): Olá Spec80, queria-te avisar que no decorrer do teu trabalho existem algumas relações que estão a ser quebradas ou duplicadas.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2383830#map=19/41.82924/-7.61147

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4037764#map=19/41.40392/-8.52009

Isto preocupa-me pois é possível que no futuro isto possa acontecer novamente.
Spec80 (2015-01-12 10:04:11+00:00): Bom dia!

Não obstante de vários erros poderem não ter sido cometidos por mim, as relações serão devidamente corrigidas após a conflation de ways. Prevejo que a demora não seja muita.

Outros problemas que podes encontrar e eu já os conheço são a duplicação de nodes nos extremos das ways e linhas admin ainda não corrigidas com traçados desviados. Esta última será corrigida com o decorrer do processo naturalmente. Os duplicados serão processados algoriticamente.

Tenho tido o máximo de cuidado para desligar nodes que estejam ligados a outros elementos. No fim também criarei uma validação para isso. Se porventura  encontrares situações destas, por favor alerta-me por comment com indicação da way e nodes detétados fora do sítio. 

Abraço!
Hjart (2015-01-08 14:20:25+00:00): Er det en skiltet rute du har forsøgt at tegne ind her?
Hjart (2015-01-09 18:05:34+00:00): Du havde lagt dele af stien dobbelt over andre stier. Dette regnes for en fejl. Jeg har rettet det.

Har du desuden gps-spor som du kan uploade som så vi andre kan tjekke at stien ligger korrekt?