piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2021-10-09 09:21:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Difficult to judge your mapping based on 1 building you mapped.

Please pay attention on these points. 
Your mapping is oversized and includes 2 buildings.
Square the rectangular buildings you map and be more accurate.
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112131663
Frans S (2021-10-07 09:02:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
An urgent request. Please use the Mapbox imagery instead of the Bing.
Bestregards
Frans S (2021-10-09 09:19:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key.
You did not map all buildings on your task square.

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112132457
Glassman (2021-10-08 21:57:24+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112132516
nmombo12 (2021-10-10 18:22:44+00:00): Hello,

I reviewed this changeset and it looks good. 

-Noah
jonrellim (2021-10-05 18:48:47+00:00): Als ik de website bekijk zie ik juist dat op het lege veld nog een 8 tal kavels moeten worden verkocht (let op dat de kavelkaart omgedraaid is). Bouwen moet nog beginnen want op het moment is het een braak stuk land.
jonrellim (2021-10-05 18:50:38+00:00): Hier een vrij recente street view https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1470719793321351
Wetterhorn (2021-10-05 21:26:28+00:00): Verrek, ik heb het kaartje niet goed bekeken. Maar het is ook gek dat er inmiddels gras is gezaaid op dat stuk land 🧐 Kan nergens meer info (incl data) vinden over die CPO. Nu zo ff laten totdat er bouwactiviteiten beginnen?
jonrellim (2021-10-05 22:51:28+00:00): ja prima, we zien wel ;)
zorglubu (2021-10-06 08:08:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Je reviens vers vous, car dans ce groupe de modifications également, vous avez créé des relations sur des contours simples (contour école, parking, bâtiment, ...).
Je vais les corriger mais c'est un gros boulot.

Pour un bâtiment simple qui ne contient pas de zone intérieure, ou un parking, ou le contour de l'emprise de l'école, essayez de le dessiner avec un seul trait continu. Merci.
Glassman (2021-10-08 21:57:29+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112133449
azakh-world (2021-10-11 15:37:17+00:00): Hello.
When you convert a railway=station object to railway=stop, train routes get invalid. Please, create a stop_area relation that combines a station, stop_positions and platforms, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13314817. Sometimes a stop_area is already created, so you need only to add new members.
Validation page https://maps.mail.ru/osm/tools/subways/latest/south-africa.html show all such problems.

Best regards,
Alexey
JohanWJoubert (2021-10-11 17:08:22+00:00): Noted, @azakh-world, Alexey. But they were tagged incorrectly to start off with. Stations should not be associated with the rail track (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstation ). Nodes on the `railway=rail` ways should be `stop_positions`, not stations. The `stop_position` is part of the train route, not the station (because a station means different things to different people). We need them to be `stop_positions` otherwise we cannot have navigable transit networks.

I am currently cleaning it up so we have navigable networks. I will add the stations to the `stop_area` going forward. When I'm done, I will go back and fix the others already changed.
JohanWJoubert (2021-10-11 17:10:55+00:00): If you can point me to wiki documentation indicating what the correct relationship should be between "train route" (relation), and "stop area" (relation), then we can hopefully get clarity. But the current documentation seems to suggest that there need not be a formal tie (I stand corrected, so please advise). 
Best regards,
Johan
azakh-world (2021-10-12 11:05:30+00:00): If a station node is part of rails it is not a critical error - data consumers may simply ignore that fact. If a stop_position is used in train routes and it is not connected with a station via stop_area relation, then this makes public transport broken and routing impossible over such networks. See the list of members https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area#Members
JohanWJoubert (2021-10-12 14:54:51+00:00): Noted, thanks. I started to make the new changes accordingly - sorry for the unintended consequences. I will fix those that we already changed. Just give me a few days.
TrickyFoxy (2022-02-25 21:05:47+00:00): 👋 Какой источник данных вы использовали? Половины домов нет на доступных спутниковых снимках
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112133849
LySioS (2021-12-12 20:21:26+00:00): Tu as laissé l'arrêt Lurçat au croisement de l'avenue de la côte Vermeille. il existe encore ?
hoancat (2021-12-12 21:13:31+00:00): Non, mais il y a l'arrêt Camus juste après, devant le collège. Je l'avais laissé parce que je n'étais pas sûr de son emplacement à l'époque.
Glassman (2021-10-08 21:58:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: Square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112134919
bigopenmac (2021-12-27 17:19:54+00:00): Когда двигаешь здания, то необходимо также двигать ПОИ внутри этих зданий, иначе они висят на улице. Исправишь Сухаревскую 62?
Eugene Chernik (2022-01-03 19:43:26+00:00): Хорошо
eggie (2021-10-05 19:15:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ZLima12 (2021-10-07 20:49:06+00:00): Hi,

Saw Mill River Parkway and Briarcliff-Peekskill Parkway should not be motorway here. They are not built to those standards.
ZLima12 (2021-10-07 20:53:34+00:00): Hi,

Briarcliff-Peekskill Parkway should not be motorway here.
ZLima12 (2021-10-07 21:32:05+00:00): Hi,

Taconic State Parkway is not consistently built to motorway standards in these areas.
felipeeugenio (2021-10-05 18:54:10+00:00): Hola.
No es accesible o no existe? porque lo borró completamente.
Podemos arreglaro, pero diganos por favor por cual lado no se puede acceder y si acaso hay una reja que impide el paso.
saludos
ZLima12 (2021-10-07 21:37:08+00:00): Hi,

Taconic State Parkway is not consistently built to motorway standards in this area.
Glassman (2021-10-08 22:06:28+00:00): #TIP: access=private would indicate that the public isn't allowed there. Most people don't add private to playing fields.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112136305
KL Teh (2021-10-11 01:25:51+00:00): Good morning. Chew Jetty has both the tags building=house and place=neighbourhood, which is probably a tagging mistake. So in this case, it's more appropriate to use the tag place=neighbourhood for Chew Jetty separately from the houses, if refer to the documentation. Btw thanks for the effort you put into drawing the outline of the houses.

Reference:
1. "(House is) A single dwelling usually inhabited by a single  household, such as a single family or small group of people sharing a kitchen and living space. " from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=house
2. "A neighbourhood is a named, geographically localised place. It may be an area within a place=suburb or place=quarter of a larger settlement (such as a large place=city) or an area within a smaller settlement (such as a place=town or a place=village). " from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood
eggie (2021-10-05 19:02:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Glassman (2021-10-08 22:11:18+00:00): #TIP: Select the roundabout then right click and select the circle to make it very round. I went ahead and made the change.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112136979
Glassman (2021-10-08 22:12:16+00:00): #TIP: You might want to adjust the hops fields since it looks like a residential development is going in.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112136979
habi (2023-01-16 21:17:02+00:00): Tschou zäme
Hier auch ein Defi, der mitten auf der Wiese ist.
Laut Details sollte er wohl bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2015040707 sein, wohin ich ihn auch bewegt habe.
Gruss,
habi
habi (2023-01-16 21:18:49+00:00): Beziehungsweise, jetzt da ich gesehen habe, dass da schon einer ist, mit diesem zusammengeführt.

PS: Ich bin hier wegen https://maproulette.org/challenge/7379/
habi (2023-01-16 21:20:25+00:00): Hier das relevante Changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131353753
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-08 01:35:13+00:00): it's still misaligned, see: https://postimg.cc/zLRhyg6q

you can map it using strava layer https://erickdeoliveiraleal.medium.com/tutorial-strava-openstreetmap-josm-or-id-2e2003f4aea3
SomeoneElse (2022-06-06 10:34:59+00:00): Hello,
The bridleway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990140725 seems to cross https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/990140724 without joining it, leaving a gap in the Wye Valley Walk at https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/61495#map=18/51.86979/-2.60513 .  Any idea how things should connect up here?
Best Regards,
Andy
ma-rt-in (2021-10-08 07:11:07+00:00): Hallo,

darf man diesen Fahrradständer wirklich nicht allgemein nutzen?

vg
rop77 (2021-10-25 12:42:44+00:00): :-)
hab mich auch schon gewundert. Eine Bankfiliale im Wald...

gruß, rop77
enezeg (2025-02-05 15:36:57+00:00): bonjour, il y a quelques années vous avez ajouté des bancs sur le parvis de la gare de guingamp. je me permets de les supprimer car ils font doublons. bonnes contributions
eggie (2021-10-05 19:53:44+00:00): Welkom bij OSM.
Kleine aanpassing verricht:  
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode 
 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-05 19:56:53+00:00): Dag Bart Adema..  De info heb ik even samengevoegd met de BAG (Kadaster) adresnode..  
Lijkt me verder prima zo.
MVG
eggie
bxl-forever (2021-10-06 00:22:23+00:00): Hello,
Your landuse=residential area is overlapping two existing construction areas.
Do I understand from your change that construction is finished in this zone, i.e. get rid of the construction sites?
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:49:25+00:00): No the buildings that are already finished are in this residential area and the rest is still under constuction
bxl-forever (2023-01-22 15:58:22+00:00): Uh… your answer is about a discussion we had 15 months ago.  Things have changed here, and incidently I surveyed it a couple of times, even earlier this month, and the map has been updated to the latest situation.
But thanks for having replied, anyway.
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 16:01:13+00:00): The reason i replied is because i got blocked and one of the conditions to not get blocked again was to reply to comments on my changesets
DressyPear4 (2021-10-05 22:44:13+00:00): Olá, não faça testes no mapa, adicione apenas o que existe.
Heinz_V (2022-01-05 22:34:11+00:00): Where do I find the notification that ODR78 is declared a trunk?
Heinz_V (2022-01-05 22:36:08+00:00): Please give the source for all roads that you declare a trunk.
El ArquiPachuca (2021-10-05 20:37:10+00:00): Era por Mapbox
charl3s (2021-10-10 07:50:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978539360#map=15/51.1937/22.0868

Dlaczego access=no? Nie jest to błąd?
kubahahaha (2021-10-10 08:01:00+00:00): Wygląda na błąd, ja tu tylko podpiąłem któryś podjazd i nie patrzyłem wcale na tagi.
Stawiam że autor chciał dać motor_vehicle=no
Henosb (2021-10-05 21:48:01+00:00): Maxar Premium Imagery (5.97; -3.58); Strava
jqngarcia (2021-10-06 05:44:14+00:00): Hola iraima, crec que estas equivocan les etiquetes fountain, es per font ornamental, per font de beure es amenity=drinking_water.

Salut i Mapes, JQN
iraima (2021-10-06 11:12:22+00:00): Hola!
És veritat, com es nota que sóc nova amb tot això. Ja els he modificat, espero que ara si que estiguin bé!
gràcies,
Iraima
ralley (2021-10-05 21:11:30+00:00): If you see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95324620 this name was added from signage observed on the ground.  As per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name the name is "The most prominent name on a sign posted on the feature itself", i.e. the name OTG.  Have you observed your new name OTG?  If not please revert your change and add the new name as official_name or alt_name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112140988
Rodrigo_Freire (2021-10-06 11:27:57+00:00): Sempre desenhar o perimetro da edificação em si e não apenas o lote.
Fiz algumas correções também no uso do solo (mudando de "área para comércio" para "comércio"
Friendly_Ghost (2021-10-06 13:59:44+00:00): Hoi Tilia_J. Ik woon hier vlakbij. Als je lokale kennis nodig hebt roep je maar ;)
Tilia_J (2021-10-09 19:52:46+00:00): Hi,

Dank voor je "local knowledge" en je aanvullingen op mijn edits.

Ik ben in het algemeen aan het worstelen met de beken / sprengen voor wat betreft naamgeving en positionering.

Met name de loop van de Halveradsbeek iets ten noorden van de "boardwalk" vind ik tijfelachtig maar volgens de bekenstichting (waarvoor ik actief ben) en het waterschap is dit correct.

Als je bekend bent met de Renkumse beken dan hoor ik dat graag
gurglypipe (2021-10-06 09:59:33+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you please try and make future changesets a bit smaller? This one covers most of the area of England, which makes it hard for other local mappers to review, as they end up looking at changes outside their local area. Splitting it into multiple changesets, one for (say) each town/city you’re editing would be great.

Note that you can also select a building and press the ‘q’ key to automatically square its corners, which makes it easier to draw regular buildings.

Thanks, and happy editing :)
NieWnen (2021-10-05 21:50:24+00:00): *https://msochaczew.e-mapa.net/;
spely (2022-01-13 14:10:26+00:00): Писать названия капслоком не рекомендуется. Ознакомиться с рекомендациями можно здесь: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
spely (2022-01-13 14:06:16+00:00): В название остановки мы пишем то, что написано на аншлаге (в соотв с https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%89%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D1%82%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%82). Если название точно неизствестно - оставляем имя пустым.
timmito (2021-10-14 01:05:50+00:00): Danke für die Eintragung der Fahrradpumpstation. Bitte beachten: Name is the name only. Ein description ist schon gut, ein Name ist das eher nicht. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
PT-53 (2021-10-06 07:42:37+00:00): Revert,
wegen Änderungen am Friedhof Mengen ohne Ortskenntnisse und Ergänzung eines Bildstockes ohne Angabe der Quelle.
ovruni (2021-10-06 04:49:57+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios nuevamente ha agregado etiquetas de edificio en una vía que no es completamente un edificio.
Saludos
Kevo (2021-10-11 15:07:23+00:00): Most of these edits are pretty close to vandalism, whether intentional or not.  Please stop making changes and edits that do not exist and please stop turning address ranges into roads that do not exist.
Dawid2849 (2021-10-06 13:57:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2883324
kubahahaha (2021-10-06 14:02:02+00:00): O co chodzi? Ja właśnie usunąłem tą wypożyczalnię. Może ktoś nie widzi jeszcze zmian.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4820728546/history
Dawid2849 (2021-10-06 14:06:54+00:00): Wiem. Chciałem tylko żebyś zamknął, bo to Ty usunąłeś :)
MatthewSeale (2021-10-10 01:59:27+00:00): Hi flushmaniac, you have tagged a variety of named service roads as bicycle=no tags with only Bing imagery listed as the source.  Most of them appear to be either laneways open to all traffic or roads within property developments.  Did you mean that all access is restricted (access=xxx) in some of these?   What is your source of information that these roads are closed to bicycles, but open to other vehicles?   Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112144836
flushmaniac (2021-10-10 02:09:23+00:00): Hey Matthew,
I've physically ridden those rides on my bike.

I use an awesome app called Wandrer. It uses OSM to show which roads/paths are rideable to gamify the map. You then ride the roads and with integration to strava. Wandrer shows you've completed each suburb. 

So if I get to a road and can't ride it, then I'll mark as access private if gated community or as bicycle= No.

Hope that helps, if you're a cyclist who is into maps then checkout wandrer.earth
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112144836
MatthewSeale (2021-10-10 03:56:31+00:00): Thanks flushmaniac.  
Yes I know and use Wandrer.Earth.  Agree that Wandrer can be useful to help cyclists identify roads may need updating on OSM.  However I’m not convinced that bicycle=no is the correct tag to apply on some of these roads as it seems the restrictions on most of these roads are unlikely to be specific to cyclists.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle

If housing estate roads like Andrews Crt (WAY: 23892487) are part of a gated community where the public is restricted from accessing (no entry, gate control) then you can use access=private rather than a mode specific tag like bicycles=no.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate

I did see Wandrer changed their selection criteria in the September to include named service roads that had not previously been included.  That caused a debate on the Wandrer.Earth strava group since cyclists who had previously ridden every road in a suburb in the past are now missing isolated named service roads.  https://www.strava.com/clubs/528504/posts/17623214.   

For some of those roads they are not restricted for bicylces or other traffic.  Rather they were not part of Wandrer when the cyclist completed that area so may not have been attempted. In those cases your options are to take the issue up with Wandrer admin (or the Strava group) about their change of criteria and/or go ride the road if you still want to complete Wandrer in that area.   

I spotted a couple of other ways in this changeset that look to have other errors that would be worth fixing:
•	Luntar Lane (way 232008369) does not go through to Warrigal road on Bing or Vicmaps.  Suggest the issue here is that the road geometry needs correction.  Again suggest unlikely it would be restricted for cyclists specifically.
•	Way 49131971 is the drive thru in Red Rooster Brighton.  Agree cyclists are not normally permitted in a drive thru (I’ve tried it once), but the OSM problem here is that it should not be tagged with a name that describes the purpose (name is the name only in OSM).  Suggest to delete the name tag and apply the correct service=drive-through tag.  That should render as not for cyclists in Wandrer and other correctly configured cycling apps so no need for bicycle=no once it is correctly tagged.
impiaaa (2021-10-06 16:48:07+00:00): On the wiki and elsewhere, an asterisk ("*") is usually not literal, rather it means that that part of the tag can be anything, and a literal asterisk is incorrect. I've changed this to highway=residential to match the surrounding roads.
RoYank (2021-10-06 12:37:24+00:00): Привет. А почему oneway=-1 ? Ведь направление линии правильное
Pavel239 (2021-10-06 12:45:29+00:00): какой именно линии?
Там две параллельных проезжих части с односторонним движением, естественно в разные стороны
RoYank (2021-10-06 12:51:47+00:00): oneway=-1 вы поставили только у одной из проезжих частей проспекта. Соответственно, я имею ввиду линию где oneway=-1 :)

Согласно wiki: "oneway=-1 -- одностороннее движение в направлении, противоположном направлению линии."

Но там движение не противоположно направлению линии. Линия направлена в правильную сторону.
Pavel239 (2021-10-06 12:56:38+00:00): нет, обе линии в одну сторону направлены, а движение в разные. Посмотрите на стрелочки - сейчас всё правильно
RoYank (2021-10-06 13:01:15+00:00): Странно всё это. Я отчетливо вижу стрелочки направленные в разные стороны. И в iD и в JOSM перепроверил
RoYank (2021-10-06 13:05:54+00:00): Разобрался. Вы правы :)

Но мне кажется, проще линию развернуть.
Frans S (2021-10-06 10:22:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Buildings needs to be mapped individually. Not clustered. 
You mapped a few traces as a building without proof of a building. (shadow that proofs that an object is above ground level.  I removed the bad mappings . Status changed back to more mapping needed.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112145313
Frans S (2021-10-06 10:14:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. 
You tend to oversize your mappings. Please map as accurate as possible.
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112145603
TuAmigoElEditor (2021-10-06 01:43:06+00:00): Hola, he notado que en todas tus ediciones has usado el mapa satelital de Bing. Quisiera hacerte notar que varias calles editadas están hechas con la imagen satelital de Maxar ya que es el mapa más actualizado al menos aquí en el Perú. 
Para poder acceder a el mapa Maxar puedes ir a la opción de Background settings (con su atajo por defecto: tecla B) y seleccionar Maxar Standar Imagery como fondo de Edición.
Espero que consideres usar este mapa satelital a menudo ya que hay algunas construcciones recientes que no podrían ser visualizadas sin dicho mapa.
Saludos.