piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Buraddo (2021-08-12 10:02:30+00:00): I initially named it "Drumul expres" as this was the name used by the authorities and in the press (the name "drumul rapid" or "drumul expres" referred initially to the new road behind the railway station and then it was applied also to the extensions - new roads towards Calea Clujului and new road towards DN19). It was never an official name, but it stuck locally and with the officials.
Around the time time last part opened there started news regarding the Oradea-Arad highway/expressway and to avoid confusion between the projects RobertH-PUM suggested to call it Centura "Drumul expres".
I suggest looking over this forum post at what was disscused in the first half of 2020, when this road opened - https://forum.peundemerg.ro/index.php?topic=904.90
GinaroZ (2021-08-09 22:38:30+00:00): Don't know if you are aware but there's a background overlay you can enable called "OSMUK Cadastral Parcels" which will help with the alignment.
Thanks for adding the new Claypits paths btw :)
Ossian Lore (2021-08-10 00:37:55+00:00): I did thanks, your previous help some months ago has kept me on my alignment game. I suppose have should have dropped the Cadastral name instead of the ESRI Clarity now you mention it... oops.
Someone had already drawn a number of the paths in Claypits, I just realigned and added to them, still more detail begging. Will be fun (as it goes with OSM) to see how exact my Garscube Bridge link turns out to be when there's new imagery or a good trace.
GinaroZ (2021-08-11 16:22:42+00:00): Ah, didn't know if I'd mentioned it to you before (it's listed on the imagery_used if you edit it with it turned on).  This zig zag path should probably also be bicycle=yes?
Msiipola (2021-08-09 17:47:57+00:00): Inte så lyckat
psimonyi (2021-08-13 03:51:06+00:00): Hi, it looks as if you accidentally joined Smyth to Riverside under the bridge. (I've disconnected them in changeset 109600898.)
jcarlson (2021-08-09 15:00:50+00:00): I was nearly about to start in on this thing, but updated my JOSM layer just after your edits posted. Thanks for taking care of this thing!
gscholz (2021-08-27 04:44:10+00:00): Hi Carlos,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding unconnected ways (red dots):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-54.33320&lat=-26.05754&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As you probably know these cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind REgards
Guido
Carlos Brys (2021-08-27 14:13:00+00:00): All fixed
ARitz Cracker (2021-08-28 00:49:58+00:00): Hey, why exactly did you make Echo Drive inaccessible? I made it inaccessible by mistake
Recoil16 (2021-08-10 11:57:51+00:00): Hallo bomblayer!
Könntest Du womöglich etwas aussagekräftigere Changeset-Kommentare verwenden? An diesem und anderen Changesets steht "Ney. Hydranten" dran, obwohl überhaupt keine Hydranten bearbeitet wurden. 
Grüße
bomblayer (2021-08-11 08:28:33+00:00): Hab‘ da wohl der Einfachheit halber wohl ne alte Angabe übernommen. Werde ich drauf achten.
eggie (2021-08-09 15:37:25+00:00): Welkom bij OSM,
Bedankt voor de bijdrage. 
Alleen een naam zal niets doen in OSM. 
craft=metal_construction heb ik toegevoegd.
office=company zie je ook veel en  levert in ieder geval een zichtbare naam op.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dmetal_construction
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2021-08-29 12:16:29+00:00): Hi andershl, 

you added 403 nodes with OFFICIAL=yes and =no

what's the meaning of this tag?
andershl (2021-08-29 19:45:06+00:00): Oh, that one was not yet pulled back and changed to "note = Official name" or "note = Known name only, not officially approved". Thanks for being observant...
andershl (2021-08-30 07:39:36+00:00): By the way: These points are only temporary. Next step will be to assign each name to the glacier outline and delete the point. That done all 403 will disappear. I shall scan and clean up residue at some appropriate time. If you want to, you are most welcome to close some of the multi polygons and reassign corrrresponding names..
user_5359 (2021-08-12 07:18:48+00:00): Hello (again)! Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109378992
user_5359 (2021-08-12 14:39:52+00:00): Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971675951, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971675952
Hanan Tikveša (2021-08-09 15:40:35+00:00): You were wrong about moving the tunnel.
i have fixed it in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109416530
Badojo (2021-08-09 16:23:20+00:00): ok, thanks
gabro00 (2021-08-10 09:03:46+00:00): Szia!
A körforgalomra nem szükséges egyirányúsági címke, mert OSM-ben minden vonalnak iránya van iránya és a körforgalom (junction=roundabout) címkézés a vonal irányában vett egyirányúságot implikál.
Ugyan nem hiba, de nem szükséges rá, a #109450181 changesetben korrigáltam.

Itt olvashatsz részletesebben róla: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction=roundabout
neuhausr (2021-08-09 18:38:46+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! It appears you're editing a number of industrial-related tags in this changeset, but it's not clear from your "general updating" changeset comment why. Could you clarify the reasoning for your changes? Thanks much and happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109415942
eggie (2021-08-09 16:31:31+00:00): Welkom bij OSM

Bedankt voor de bijdrage. 
Kompas Werkt staat al op de officiele adresnode. Is dit niet de zelfde instantie?

MVG
eggie
Scout Jens (2021-08-12 07:54:16+00:00): Durch dieses Beispiel weiß ich nun, wie man das richtig darstellt. Vielen Dank!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-03-27 00:37:15+00:00): essas vias de fato existem? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8993505975
Hanan Tikveša (2021-08-09 16:42:48+00:00): "Area" is not a good changeset comment.
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Also, you are using google maps as a source???
i will have to contact DWG now.
Polarbear-repair (2021-08-09 19:59:32+00:00): DWG Ticket#2021080910000223
 
Dear Sandra Flores Molina,
as Hanan already pointed out - we are absolutely not allowed to copy data from Google or other copyrighted sources. 
I had to revert your changes (cs 109426885). 
As this is your first edit, I assume it is a beginner's mistake. 
Also, please only delete objects that have ceased to exist, and explain that in your changeset comment.
Jakka (2021-08-14 16:20:42+00:00): Persoonlijk geen voorstander van "crop" erbij te zetten tenzij je de wisselteelt permanent zelf kan opvolgen
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109416671
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-10 10:01:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7952812716/history - what you meant by shop=farmde here?
Hanan Tikveša (2021-08-09 16:06:28+00:00): Hi.
you modified 4 ways in different countries.
you could of made each changeset for each way.
the changeset comment "fix" is not helpful.
please read
http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
redd (2021-08-11 20:19:30+00:00): Hi blagodarenko,
please stop doing edits. In addition to Hanan I need to say that you did not fixed the bridge in Knetzgau but made it even worse by removing the highway-tag.
greetings,
redd
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-08-09 16:20:12+00:00): source=survey
abakus_uploader (2021-08-09 22:33:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2021-08-09 17:57:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database and not test database. Your change set will be reverted
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-10 22:34:58+00:00): Hey and welcome K_Feickert,

Note, other imagery layers may be better in this area (i.e. Maxar, National Agriculture Imagery Program).

If toilet(s) is/are located in dedicated building, tag it building=toilets

See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets

You can find most tags on the wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/

Just fyi, you can always mark a changeset for review when saving it in the editor.

Regards,

Daniel
K_Feickert (2021-08-10 23:12:37+00:00): Hi Daniel, I am familiar with NAIP and other imagery, I am just not too familiar with the iD editor. If there is a way for us to donate larger datasets especially for the Lompoc, CA region I am sure we could provide it. We usually use 3" aerials here in the office (MrSID). Feel free to contact my office 805-875-8264 if you have any questions. 

All the best, 
Keith Feickert 
GIS Analyst
City of Lompoc
eggie (2021-08-09 18:34:00+00:00): Dag BPutman.. Moet het niet een historic=memorial zijn ipv monument?

De vertaling van ons 'monument'is in het Engels memorial. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument

en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial


De Tajmahal is bv een historic monument.. Meestal grafmonument

M VG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-09 18:52:03+00:00): Aangepast naar historic=memorial..
Wellicht kan er nog een amenity=bench bij?

MVG
eggie
BPutman (2021-08-10 15:38:42+00:00): Bedankt, ik heb er een bankje bijgeplaatst
eggie (2021-08-10 16:10:48+00:00): Top!
eggie (2021-08-09 18:27:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Carto_Ferret (2021-08-09 16:34:32+00:00): Also, aligned and reclassified some roads in the vicinity of Ħaż-Żebbuġ.
iWowik (2021-08-11 09:53:38+00:00): День добрый!
Буква в номере дома пишется заглавная.
2Б
user_13896983 (2021-08-11 09:55:52+00:00): Спасибо! Буду исправлять
SekeRob (2021-08-10 11:48:31+00:00): Integration dati includere i verificazione gli altre tags sul POI ;)

"Missing international prefix"

ciao
G_P_J (2021-08-09 19:29:23+00:00): Cześć, ponownie proszę, abyś nie umieszczał nazwy miejscowości w znaczniku addr:city we wsiach bez nazwanych ulic. Od tego jest znacznik addr:place.
Lee Carré (2021-08-10 09:43:06+00:00): It would seem better to at least preserve the full & proper name with the official_name key, and use short_name for the abbreviated version.

Abbreviation (in this context) is a software problem (and going from expanded to abbreviated is much easier than the inverse), whereas OSM is (primarily) about accurate data, not pretty rendering.

OSM strongly advises to avoid http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Especially given the verifiability requirement (and mapping what's on the ground), when road-name signs (discovered during survey) differ (including prefixes, and/or don't include abbreviations) then the tagging should match, rather than being arbitrary.

Unless there's some rationale that I'm missing?
jcr83 (2021-08-10 13:10:06+00:00): Bonjour, 
Pour indiquer qu'un sentier est balisé, il existe la clé "trailblazed". Pour plus d'infos, lire:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trailblazed
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-09 16:57:18+00:00): Hey viplavm,

In Nordrhein Westfalen, NRW Orthophoto is the standard imagery layer. If it doesn't work, look for a wm(t)s link to put in the "Custom" layer in iD (see also the German forum).

Regards,

Daniel
viplavm (2021-08-11 12:03:05+00:00): Hi Daniel, 
Thanks for your valuable inputs. I will make sure to use NRW orthophoto imagery in my future edits in this region. Happy to learn new things from you. 
Regards,
viplavm
syntex (2022-06-05 09:45:30+00:00): Zmieniłeś adres na błędny. To nie jest Bielańska 2A tylko Corazziego 2A
Rogoyski (2022-06-05 11:08:55+00:00): Zgoda, dziękuję za uwagę. Rzadko ruszam adresy, możliwe, że to był w ogóle błąd edytorski, a nie świadoma zmiana.
Shaun das Schaf (2023-01-13 20:46:33+00:00): Hi ElektroVirus, you tagged many ways here with "mtb:scale=-1":
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1q7H

Do you maybe mean "1-" instead of "-1"? Or what does the "-1" stand for? It is not the correct format for this key.

Or do you want to express that one is not allowed to cycle on these paths? However, this is already done by bicycle=no.

Best regards
Shaun das Schaf
neuhausr (2021-08-10 19:26:52+00:00): Hi, landuse=ritual is not a tag that is used. Maybe you are looking for something related to place of worship? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109421828
babbien (2021-08-13 12:13:40+00:00): Hi neuhausr,

it's the Mormon site of 
Adam-ondi-Ahman, as far as I know there are currently not worshipping from there.
Unrelated to this I'm having problems finding the valid name of this river: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13072423 – parts are tagged as Thompson R., others as Grand River.

Best wishes,
babbien
neuhausr (2021-08-16 14:14:05+00:00): OK, then I'm not sure what landuse=ritual is supposed to mean. From reading the wikipedia page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam-ondi-Ahman) it could be tagged with place=locality (a place with a name but no population), or possibly one of the historic tags. 

On the river name, according to the Thompson River wikipedia entry, "In Iowa, it is known simply as the Grand River and passes near the city of Grand River." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson_River_(Missouri) It'd probably be best for someone local to take a look--you could add a note.
noelbov (2021-08-11 12:25:32+00:00): Is dat middelste stukje Rue du Bolland enkelrichting ook voor fietsers: dat zou een impact hebben op  relatie 65-66 (9937118, v6)
Bedankt voor antw.
noël
StijnRR (2021-08-14 10:53:18+00:00): Inderdaad. Dat is ook enkelrichting voor fietsers. Dus ik heb opnieuw de oneway:bicycle=no verwijderd en de relatie aangepast. In de andere richting loopt die via de Rue J. Wauters.
noelbov (2021-08-14 11:58:09+00:00): Dank u !
Hanan Tikveša (2021-08-09 17:59:06+00:00): Please use changeset comments.
i've contacted you but you didn't read.
in this changeset, you could of commented "deleted fiction" or something similar.
joel56dt (2021-08-09 18:44:14+00:00): What is the value in these additional nodes? I generally delete any additional nodes along a straight line because I don't see the need but if they provide some value I will make sure not to.
Allison P (2021-08-09 19:27:43+00:00): The location is fine, but more importantly, there are no descriptive tags.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:34:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
FvGordon (2022-01-10 17:02:37+00:00): Ist die Straße wegen dieser Baustelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520011523 immer noch gesperrt?
ReinholdR (2022-01-10 18:46:41+00:00): Hallo, nein die Straße ist durchgängig zweispurig befahrbar. Ich habe das gerade geändert.
mueschel (2021-08-14 08:15:46+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of 
OFFICIAL=yes
?
This tag is not used in other places - what makes a glacier "official"?
andershl (2021-08-14 11:57:53+00:00): It is an official and approved place name. Is there a better or more correct way? Then I shall re-edit. For the rest I have "official no" because it (or another one) still has be appoved or assigned (or simply have spelling changed). Lots of old norwegian names where approval would most likely simply be "fjeldet" instead of "fjellet"...
andershl (2021-08-14 11:59:43+00:00): Ahh these are glaciers, my last remark was about peaks, sorry. For glaciers changes would typically be from "gletscher" or "bræ" or "breen" to "gletsjer"....
andershl (2021-08-14 12:02:56+00:00): One more thing: Lots of glaciers are already  mapped into multipolygons as "xx glacier". This is in all instances incorrect. Name would be "xx gletsjer" or a similar inuit name with the "gletsjer" one as alt_name....
mueschel (2021-08-14 13:03:04+00:00): "It is an official and approved place name."

That would be official_name = XYZ
andershl (2021-08-15 07:33:10+00:00): Note that the points are all meant to be temporary. The glacier areas should ideally be enclosed as multi polygons, names reassigned to them and my simple points deleted. That is, however, beyond my capability.  My step 1 was the pointing out of the right places and names. Anyone is more than welcome to do so..
user_5359 (2022-04-12 15:10:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971716356. What is the meaning of the tag "religion" = "55_tenth_stree_wyoming_pa18644"?
gpserror (2021-08-13 18:14:39+00:00): Looks like the new location is tagged but the POI longitude/latitude needs to be changed... Just a reminder that the tagging doesn't move the POI.
gpserror (2021-08-13 18:52:17+00:00): Oh... btw, I figured out how to move it efficiently sorta... Don't worry about it anymore, It's fixed now :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5954688815
eggie (2021-08-09 18:56:05+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Best lastig in het begin. Editor iD heeft de neiging om de paden aan de landuse te plakken. Wanneer je de linker alt toets gebruikt tijdens intekenen plakt het niet. 



Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109423597
MVG
Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-08-09 19:09:35+00:00): Pad losgemaakt van de landuse en de landuse uit de knoop gehaald.
Maar even de rendering afwachten
gr eggie
Doctor-Snuggles (2021-08-09 19:12:25+00:00): Top, zal er de volgende keer op letten.
Groeten, Ferry
SomeoneElse (2021-08-09 18:28:09+00:00): Not sure what happened there.  Comment should have been "Stew and Oyster beer and wheelchair tags"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-14 14:35:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127521226 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes by joserrg12.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6439 and previous blocks for context.
eggie (2021-08-09 19:18:15+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback   Wanneer je een adresnummer verandert komt het waarschijnlijk nu 2x voor en één adresnummer zal ontbreken.
Alle adresnodes zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster.
Beter niets aan veranderen svp.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-08-09 19:22:47+00:00): reverted by changeset #109425659
Adres hersteld.. 
213 staat iets verder naar links. je kunt gewoon met de adresnodes scuiven, maar niet veranderen svp.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-09 19:30:38+00:00): typo.. Iets naar rechts
tekim (2021-08-09 19:49:18+00:00): Sources cited do not support all of the changes made.  What is the source for motor_vehicle=private onhttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971723603
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109424594
Clarke22 (2021-08-10 05:15:23+00:00): WTF dude!  Stop harassing me!  I added a service road that obviously existed on the air photo.  It obviously is gated. It obviously is not a public road.
Glassman (2021-08-10 23:22:07+00:00): Your edits looks good. One question - you added a traffic signal to the woods just south of SW100 St. Did you mean for it to be placed elsewhere?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109424807
Sabina Beg DTM (2021-08-11 16:07:42+00:00): The traffic signal just to the south of SW 100th St is a mistake. I will try to fix it.
tekim (2021-08-09 19:41:59+00:00): Sources cited do not support all of the changes made
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109424939
Clarke22 (2021-08-10 05:08:50+00:00): What are you referring to specifically?
aweech (2021-08-10 15:17:29+00:00): Hi,
In this changeset and in 109426429, you deleted a whole bunch of buildings. I'm assuming from your changeset description "we can do better" that you thought that the building outlines weren't good enough. In OpenStreetMap, we try to always improve on other people's work, not just delete everything. Are you currently working on restoring those buildngs? It's been almost a day, and I haven't seen you make any progress. Also, "we can do better" is not a great changeset description. Here are some examples of useful and informative changeset descriptions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments#Examples
babbien (2021-08-10 15:50:36+00:00): Hi aweech,

I'm sorry for the overly casual wording. And currently working to bring back all these mansions with better precision.
Have you seen their quality before?

Kind regards
aweech (2021-08-10 16:13:41+00:00): Hi,
I'm glad to here that you are working to restore those buildings; that way I won't need to revert your changesets myself. I did see that the buildings weren't of the highest quality.  The editor that you are using provides some tools that help you improve buildings. If you click on the + sign between nodes in a building, it will create a new node that you can move to where it's needed. Also, if you have a building selected and press the "q" button, it will make it so the corners are at 90° angles.
eggie (2021-08-09 19:28:46+00:00): Dag Alex..  De markeringen van de bomen kun je vinden in de BGT omtrekgericht. 
Dat is een transparant die je als achtergrond kunt gebruiken. (Landmeetkundige dienst)
Waarschijnlijk stonden ze allemaal goed.

Kijk eens naar de beter editor JOSM
en ook hoe je hier de BGT kunt gebruiken.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 

BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg 

De voorgaande mapper was ik zelf. 

MVG
eggie
gscholz (2021-08-27 04:44:00+00:00): Hi Carlos,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding unconnected ways (red dots):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-54.33320&lat=-26.05754&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As you probably know these cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind REgards
Guido
Carlos Brys (2021-08-27 14:13:14+00:00): All fixed
b-jazz (2021-10-18 21:26:17+00:00): Hello there. You broke one of the outer members of the national forest multipolygon. It doesn't enclose anything now as it's just two nodes. Is that something you know how to fix?
Brian562 (2021-10-18 23:03:08+00:00): I fixed it, it was a duplicate that I tried to remove but didn't fully delete
aweech (2021-08-10 14:32:22+00:00): Hi,
Is there a particular reason you have been removing surface=asphalt from asphalt highways? It seems harmful.
wambag (2021-09-25 19:51:06+00:00): I thought surface=asphalt was implied, but I have come to find that actually surface=paved is implied. I will revert that change here.