piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mgpx (2021-11-11 22:29:41+00:00): Én pártolnám, a jogi helyzetnek megfelelő jelölés, és a természetvédelmi szabályokat kevésbé ismerő, de jogkövető természetjárók számára figyelmeztetést adhat.

Nemrég egy ismerősöm hívta fel a figyelmemet, hogy az FVTT táblákon szereplő "Belépés csak engedéllyel" felirat félrevezető, pont a lényeget ("Maradj a jelzett utakon") nem írják ki. Emiatt csomóan nem is ismerik ezt a szabályt. 

Abban megoszlik az OSM szerkesztők véleménye, hogy etikus-e FVTT-n jelzett úton el nem érhető szép kilátásokat (és hasonló POI-kat) OSM-en jelezni. Az ellenőrizhetőség kritériumának megfelel, de tény, hogy nem túl felelős viselkedés tiltott területet turisztikai célpontként feltüntetni. Ellenérv viszont, hogy pl. a Cartographia térképeken is fenn van néhány ilyen pont, ezek szerint ők sem tartották etikátlannak.
Bruno Medeiros (2021-11-06 18:46:11+00:00): This is my first time using JOSM, I used it to transform the tracks available at https://arcg.is/0y10ja into trails for OpenStreetMap. Hopefully I did it well, but it would be great if someone more expert could check for errors in metadata.
mariotomo (2021-11-09 12:37:37+00:00): hi. we should ask explicit permission to import this. the license "CC:BY-SA" is not compatible for importing to OSM. Milton Solano is on OSM, and he may be able to confirm an exception. I posted a topic on the Panama Forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=846222.  please do intervene in the petition.
Milton Solano (2021-11-09 14:08:40+00:00): Excellent job importing the BCI trails. There are other features available for BCI, like No visitors zone, trail markers, building names, streams on the island.
mariotomo (2021-11-16 22:55:30+00:00): Hola. Gracias Milton por quitar la cláusula SA de vuestra licencia. Sin embargo podrían considerar una excepción explícita? Así como lo mencioné en el foro.
Piotr Strębski (2021-11-05 21:55:33+00:00): Ogólnie bardzo ciężka edycja - słabe zdjęcia lotnicze, bardzo duże skupisko leśne, dużo domyślania się i kombinacji w oparciu o mix różnych podkładów. No ale trzeba było tą część w końcu zmapować, mając świadomość, że trzeba by było przeprowadzić wizję lokalną. Z pewnością jest tam znacznie więcej budynków niż oznaczono. Fatalnie poprzesuwane obrysy z dawnych lat i podkładów, bez wsparcia obecnej ewidencji budynków i gruntów. Wszystko na oko.
archpdx (2021-11-06 18:35:22+00:00): If there's going to be construction here, I would make this area a greenfield with the name, or a construction area if construction is already going on.
Frans S (2022-01-18 14:52:01+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A request.
Please follow in next mappings the wiki highways in east Africa when mapping in that region.
Here you tagged many roads as track despite they connect settlements and farms
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

Best regards
Tomasz Rmn (2022-07-29 09:56:12+00:00): Cześć, czy ta asfaltowa droga kończy się w Ułazowie? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/295477211#map=15/50.2820/23.0227&layers=N
rickmastfan67 (2022-04-10 22:47:25+00:00): I honestly doubt NY-5 here should be secondary, even if it's based on a 'ACC classification'.  If you're wondering why, every time I've been in the area, about 75% of the traffic follows NY-5 instead of US-20 after leaving Seneca Hawk @ NY-438, as NY-5 is mostly 4-lanes, while US-20 is 2-lanes.  Now, this was before they built the roundabout to be honest, but I'm honestly doubting that the traffic patterns would change.

Just thought I'd throw my 2-cents in here.
Adam Franco (2022-04-10 23:48:27+00:00): Hi rickmastfan67, thanks for the feedback. I'm local to the Adirondacks and spend some time in the Rochester area, but haven't been to this area south of Buffalo. The NYS Streets is a very good indicator, but not perfect. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:_New_York/Highway_Classification for details. I'm totally open to the idea that NYS Streets has the priority of NY-5 and US-20 wrong and that NY-5 should be the primary for that segment. 

Most of the conversation on highway classification in NY and nationally has been taking place in the OSM-US Slack's #local-newyorkstate and #highway-classification channels. It would be great to get more feedback from western NY mappers as we still need to figure out more of the lower-classes now that the motorway/trunk network is better sorted out.

Best,
Adam
Adam Franco (2022-04-10 23:49:09+00:00): Here's the link to the OSM-US Slack if you haven't joined: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
rickmastfan67 (2022-04-11 00:05:17+00:00): I'm actually a PA mapper, but I went thru this area a ton when I was on trips with my family going up to Ontario, so I'm a little bit more knowledgeable about this area of NY-5 in particular.

We would always get off the Thruway @ Exit 58, hit up Seneca Hawk for the cheap gas (or one of the other 2 stations there if they were a tic cheaper), and then take NY-5 all the way into Buffalo to I-190 & the Peace Bridge.

But while sitting at Seneca Hawk eating (they had a Goulash deal on Saturdays back in the day that was all-you-can-eat), I kept an eye on the old traffic light there (StreetView of it since it's long gone: https://goo.gl/maps/po7jajQyrV6EUJWJA ), and noticed that ~65% (maybe is a better guess) would take NY-5 there over US-20.  Plus more traffic seems to be coming from NY-5 than US-20 when the two routes merged there.
Linkid (2022-09-03 15:22:24+00:00): Salut. Tu as ajouté un doublon pour l'arrêt de bus La Terrasse. J'ai ajouté une note pour ne pas l'oublier : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3344160. La ref n'est pas la même, faudrait voir laquelle est la bonne, du coup.
Luuuddooo (2022-09-04 15:16:36+00:00): Salut, oui effectivement, les deux arrêts sont toujours visibles sur la carte de Tisséo, mais apparemment l'un n'as plus aucun bus qui y passe, il faudrait aller voire sur place pour comprendre pourquoi il y a une nouvelle référence d’arrêt. Merci pour la note.
Carboon33 (2023-04-29 21:06:11+00:00): Bonjour, je suis venu faire un repérage terrain suite aux modifications d'itinéraires des lignes du secteur avec les travaux de la future ligne C de métro. Le POI avec la ref 3923 est la bonne. Il faut donc supprimer l'arrêt en doublon + l'arret de l'autre côté de la rue.
J'effectue les suppressions, à voir où le SCOL5 passe, je ne modifie rien là-dessus
mueschel (2021-11-09 11:13:38+00:00): Hi,
the tag 'electric_mofa' is not used in other places. Is that really accurate? In most cases it's speed_pedelec that are allowed on such cycleways.
Herrieman (2021-11-09 12:00:16+00:00): Hi mueschel, thanks for your alertness. I think I forgot to check this value before uploading. Technically it is correct though. In the Netherlands the traffic sign used here forbids mopeds (including speed pedelecs), but allows mofas without an (active) combustion engine. Therefore allowing electric mofas. But you are right that this tag is not commonly used and undocumented. I think I will therefore change it to mofa=no, even though that is not fully accurate. Hope this clears it up.
mueschel (2021-11-09 12:56:41+00:00): Actually, this tag is mentioned in a proposal:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/ElectricScooters
The last state of the discussion there was, that it's not really clear what is the best way to proceed - special tags for moped/mofa or go for a full scheme including all kinds of vehicles right away.

Maybe you could add your case to the examples table there?
Herrieman (2021-11-09 16:49:35+00:00): Thank you for looking further into it! :)
I added it to the examples over there.
ivss_xx (2022-05-23 02:10:14+00:00): There is no entrance to Wiliams St from Ferry Rd.
I had updated to reflect this last year. Not sure why it got changed back to two way.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:43:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Mashin (2021-11-06 02:21:47+00:00): Please don't delete exiting trails.
Thanks
Glassman (2021-11-06 17:41:22+00:00): This app requires that I review everything as good or bad. There is no in between. When I mark it as bad, it may only be that it doesn't fit the OSM tagging scheme. I'll leave a changeset comment with what I found.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113430145
Glassman (2021-11-06 17:42:20+00:00): I removed the hospital tag and added a healthcare clinic tag instead. We don't want people rushing to what they think is a hospital when it isn't.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113430145
blackboxlogic (2021-11-08 16:32:28+00:00): Thanks for fixing this street! And welcome to osm.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113430469
Irwin Schwab (2021-11-06 00:46:09+00:00): [comment got cut off] Someone here added all these Paths in OSM, where they eventually appeared in AllTrails, and now more people are using the illegal trails because they can see them in the app. It's a nightmare!
Mashin (2021-11-06 02:19:48+00:00): Here is a draft of document for solving this issue.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Trail_Access_Project
Mashin (2021-11-06 02:20:47+00:00): More discussion on Slack channel #Trails
https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
Irwin Schwab (2021-11-10 16:14:14+00:00): Fascinating discussion. Thank you for the insight and guidance moving forward!
MxxCon (2021-11-06 04:15:43+00:00): Hello.
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dclock, this feature should be mapped as a node, not area/building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113431457
mueschel (2021-11-09 14:58:26+00:00): Hi,
there's a "kerlo" tag on two nodes, e.g. here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9228847302
Could you check that?
NieWnen (2021-11-09 16:00:28+00:00): Thank you. It should be "kerb=lowered" and I don't know why JOSM didn't detect it as an error.
Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113571350
adamh (2021-11-06 03:00:15+00:00): Hi there, welcome to OSM.
This changeset includes different sorts of changes which are 150km apart. Generally it's recommended to keep your changesets as focused and local as possible.
This one should probably be 2-3 changesets.
Russ McD (2021-12-20 01:07:17+00:00): Well if Way: 72704945 if not a service road, what about the tiny bit of track at the Southern end, and the service road at the North ? Is that really how it is on the ground ?
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-18 05:11:52+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Arlo James Barnes (2021-11-19 23:26:00+00:00): Fair.
ivanbranco (2021-11-08 15:32:19+00:00): Hi Maria,

IGREJA=IGREJA DO AMOR DE CRISTO
area=yes

is not the correct way to tag a church. You could do something like: building=church + name=Igreja do Amor de Cristo + amenity=place_of_worship

Can you fix it?
muralito (2022-01-16 03:04:32+00:00): No. Se llama Arroyo pero es semejante "river".
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
aceman444 (2022-03-15 11:12:51+00:00): Thanks for the fixes. Someone always breaks the Flixbus relations somewhere in Europe. Sometimes the iD editor itself does invalid reordering of members.

In the country of Slovakia, please use Ortofotomozaika SR imagery (which is the best), not Bing.
Thanks.
aceman444 (2022-03-15 11:34:10+00:00): But there was no need to change "maxspeed:type" to "source:maxspeed", it was the correct tag. Yes, the wiki says source:maxspeed is mostly used in the world, but maxspeed:type is semantically the better tag so why should it be limited to UK?
DaveF (2022-03-18 17:48:46+00:00): This edit is vandalism. Do not delete entities just because you're unable to comprehend them.
ICU812 (2022-03-18 18:14:50+00:00): I'm sorry I wish I knew what you were talking about and I haven't done anything on this course in 4 months and you spanked my hand about an edit I did here back then and now this. I see the "delete" part and I've learned not to delete existing entities/splines but to edit them since then if that is what you are talking about.
DaveF (2022-03-18 18:45:32+00:00): I've reverted your vandalizing changeset where you deleted valid PROWs footpaths. 
Example: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42333646/history

And falsely resized fairways & other golf features.
ICU812 (2022-03-18 20:10:20+00:00): All are "Don't do that" lessons I've learned since then so you shouldn't see them happen again. I'm sorry for making you spend your time of my "vandalizing" errors.
skyper (2021-11-06 12:20:34+00:00): Hallo Jan
Please, always take a look at the history of objects. You missed to readd `highway=trunk`.
JOSM warned me about it, if iD does not, please, ask for it. As iD has quite a lot of problems it might be time for a different Editor.

Take care
skyper

#REVIEWED_BAD
Jan Olieslagers (2021-11-06 12:34:54+00:00): Thanks for polite comment - but what is the relevance? I meant and still mean to express doubts about this bit of public road being a runway of any kind - please elaborate?
Also, please do not tell me what I missed to read - how can you tell?
skyper (2021-11-06 12:56:24+00:00): I think you got me wrong. With "readd" I mean to add again. No doubt about that this is not a runway but you left the way without any primary tag.

Please, take a look at the object's history (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269744432/history) and this changeset some hours ago:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113419117
Jan Olieslagers (2021-11-06 13:02:55+00:00): Sincere apologies, but you ARE trying my patience. I only wanted to question the aeroway=runway on this road. That is basically wrong until the contrary be shown. For all the rest, feel free to have your way. And, err, when you mean "re-add" then please do not write "readd" - that is open to double interpretation, to say the least. Kindly yours but slightly irritated,
skyper (2021-11-06 13:29:09+00:00): Common, if you would have taken just alittle  more patience with your edit and would have taken a short glance at the history, you would have been able to understand what's going on and I would have never started this conversation.
"Readd" is proper BE so what is wrong with that?
Simply removing the primary tag but not adding a new one is simply poor editing.
Jan Olieslagers (2021-11-06 13:35:55+00:00): I removed a tag that was highly unlikely to be correct. If you feel that action was incorrect then feel free to revert it. If you see room for further improvement then please feel free, also. But please stop lecturing me - I am not here to be lectured, I am doing my little best effort to improve on our database. Either the removal of the aeroway=runway was correct or it wasn't - and I have no interest beyond. Remember this is a collective effort?
Jan Olieslagers (2021-11-06 13:39:25+00:00): Please also be aware that I am using iD only for lack of anything better - and I am very much aware that it is far rom perfect.
skyper (2021-11-07 12:33:40+00:00): I politely asked for at little improvement of your workflow. Well, if you are not interested and if you do not want not realize a problem in broken major road data, I am done. Hopefully, you are able to loosen your blinkers and take a little peak beyond your own nose, in the future.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-06 13:54:46+00:00): Hi. These features were wrongly tagged as streams. This should be also obvious from aerial photos since there is no way you can jump these features, even without local knowledge. Please revert these and other changesets in Italy. Thanks. Andrea
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113434320
MapSpot (2021-11-06 17:13:39+00:00): Sorry about the misunderstanding. I will recheck any recent stream areas I have placed.

There are a lot of additional problems in this region with very wide waterways tagged as streams. I left the ways alone and only modified river area and land use polygons. But I believe there is an over-abundance of waterway=stream. This should be checked by locals to prevent future issues from arising.
MapSpot (2021-11-06 20:35:48+00:00): I have changed the tagging from water=stream to water=river. Leave a comment on the new changes if there are any further issues.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113460519
canfe (2021-11-18 17:34:46+00:00): Non trovo corretto seguire pedissequamente ciò che propone ID e vedo che tu usi unicamente ID.
Un torrente, e spesso è denominato così proprio nel nome, ha un basso flusso e solo occasionalmente, in genere in autunno e primavera, per alcuni giorni ricopre l'alveo (riverbed). Se davvero conosci le zone, dovresti disegnare l'alveo e all'interno la zona affettivamente ricoperta stabilmente dalle acque (riverbank). Infine non segnare le zone ghiaiose (shingle) come intermittent dato che di intermittente non hanno nulla. Son secche tutto l'anno, tranne nella piena autunnale.
Vedi changeset:
113823533
113826244
113830014
113830828
MapSpot (2021-11-18 20:57:47+00:00): Thanks for letting me know about the seasonal fluctuations of this river.

I will fix the geometry of the river area so that year-round sections of the river are distinguished from the rest of the riverbed using seasonal=yes to avoid confusion.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113962909
DaveF (2022-03-11 18:49:46+00:00): Hi
Don't remove valid data.
Don't make amendments to objects you have no knowledge of.
aceman444 (2022-12-23 07:19:11+00:00): Hi, why the change to unsigned_ref on one of the roundabouts? How do you know there is no sign from just aerial imagery? Also, we do not use unsigned_ref in Slovakia, most roads aren't signed with numbers on site, but we still have all the numbers in the map. So if you really want to indicate there is no sign, better use the ref:signed=no method.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2022-12-22 02:13:18+00:00): hi Konmuang 
Thanks for contributing to osm. I see your focus and concern to improve data in Thailand. I do armchair mapper and come across Mondol Seima. I wonder, you improve the coastline to wetland tidal https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/313960965 to https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/999814281  . I found there are several issues about crossing water. There is a path crossing into the wetland you made. (Id Way 326921806), the land use residential comes overlapping with tidal wetland. I think tag wetland isn't appropriate in this area. The area doesn't present the warning and error in JOSM. Is there an area affected by tidal/ flood in season? If yes, i think additional tag such as tidal=yes or flood prone is necessary to fixing the issue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tidal
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:flood_prone 

But if you have any other suggestions, feel free to discuss. 
Happy mapping
DeKaN (2021-11-06 08:07:47+00:00): тег surface не ставится на точки. и насколько я помню, автобусы на Советской не останавливаются, там только трамвайные остановки на путях
RiverBearings (2021-12-09 23:57:30+00:00): سلام بهینام. من متوجه شدم که شما اخیراً در حال تبدیل جاده های موجود به ویژگی های مانع هستید. این‌ها به‌عنوان تغییرات برچسب نامعتبر در OSMcha مانند https://osmcha.org/changesets/111197379 پرچم‌گذاری می‌شوند. برچسب مانع برای نوع خاصی از ساختار فیزیکی جدا از جاده ها است که ممکن است نزدیک به آن باشند - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier. اگر دانش محلی از این موانع در نزدیکی جاده ها و رودخانه ها دارید، می توانید آنها را به عنوان ویژگی های جداگانه اضافه کنید، اما تبدیل جاده ها به موانع، آن جاده را از شبکه موجود حذف می کند. متشکرم و روز خوبی داشته باشید!

Hello behinam. I noticed that you are converting existing roads to barrier features recently. These are flagged as invalid tag modifications in OSMcha such as https://osmcha.org/changesets/111197379. The barrier tag is for a certain type of physical structure separate from roads that they might be near to - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier. If you have local knowledge of these barriers near roads and rivers you can add them in as separate features but converting roads to barriers will remove that road from the existing network. Thanks and have a good day!
augxcgrwxo (2021-11-06 16:01:04+00:00): Я правил недавно пляж похожий, наткнулся на мнение, что должно быть natural=shingle, потому что пляж из гальки, а гравий это другое https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dshingle Как вы считаете?

Или возможно surface=pebblestone

Я могу своими силами, чтобы у вас время не занимать.
solenoid jam (2021-11-06 17:23:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Видимо есть разные схемы тэгирования для таких пляжей. Я руководствовался тем что представлено тут:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbeach

При этом для такого пляжа предусмотрена своя отрисовка, что говорит о актуальности схемы. 

Что же до surface, то часть пляжей Гурзуфа галечная, а часть более крупной фракции, тянущей на гравий, при чем крупный. Я сейчас не могу сказать где что, по этому отметил все как отметил. Если у вас есть более точная информация, можете уточнить. 

По использованию natural=shingle особо ничего против не имею, но на мой взгляд это несколько менее релевантно чем natural=beach. Чисто интуитивно.
Если хотите, можно поменять, я не против, но лучше поднять тему на форуме, может там всплывут аргументы за ту или иную версию.
А вот что стоит добавить, так это leisure=beach_resort
Scout Jens (2024-10-19 12:21:17+00:00): Du hast hier in der Forststraße oneway.bycicle=no gelöscht , dadurch wurde die komplette Straße in der Gegenrichtung für Fahrräder als unpassierbar erklärt. Das ist falsch. Bitte besser aufpassen beim Ändern. Danke und Grüße, Jens
Lee Carré (2021-11-06 21:47:10+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Warin61 (2022-01-25 08:26:51+00:00): Hi,
Node: Sweets of Lebanon (9229343034) only has a name. That does not say what it is for OSM. 

Is it a shop ? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

Is it a restaurant? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant

What is it???
Gallia-Strike (2022-01-25 08:55:53+00:00): honestly don't know l, that's why I left it blank. The place was closed when I was there so I only saw the signs
eggie (2021-11-06 08:50:38+00:00): Dag Ithilis.. Paden die er niet zijn kun je gewoon verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-06 08:57:11+00:00): Dag Ithilis,

Gebouwen worden periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster.
We tekenen niet zelf.
Je kunt een importverzoek doorgeven aan het forum van osm in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Fouten in het Kadaster kun je doorgeven via deze site van het Kadaster zelf.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=leidseweg%20221&resultOffset=0&objectId=0626200000006351&geometry.x=91660.285&geometry.y=461107.666&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0626010000006351

Op de door jouw getekende plek staat geen gebouw. Wel een eindje verder.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-06 09:05:34+00:00): Kleine gebouw heb ik verwijderd. (Graag doorgeven aan het Kadaster anders komt het weer terug op de kaart ). Pad verwijderd.
Nieuwbouw wat opgeschoven conform BGT en Kadasterdata.

MVG
eggie