piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_4493657 (2022-06-06 17:31:29+00:00): This name does not appear in the field.
Vandalism?
user_4493657 (2022-06-06 17:31:24+00:00): This name does not appear in the field.
Vandalism?
user_4493657 (2022-06-06 17:31:05+00:00): This name does not appear in the field.
Vandalism?
user_4493657 (2022-06-06 17:30:56+00:00): This name does not appear in the field.
Vandalism?
user_4493657 (2022-06-06 17:30:48+00:00): This name does not appear in the field.
Vandalism?
user_4493657 (2022-06-06 17:30:40+00:00): This name does not appear in the field.
Vandalism?
mga_geo (2022-11-13 09:22:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez changé le network et ajouté des tags wikidata. Le network Libéo est du côté de Brive ...
Marc
Wulfmorn (2022-06-07 08:20:56+00:00): Är vägen borttagen? Jag ser den på flygfotona. Kanske skulle varit "track".
MapChan (2022-06-07 09:13:55+00:00): Är placerat stora stenar för den tidigare infarten närmast bron och numera är det placerat en serveringsvagn där.
Wulfmorn (2022-06-07 11:19:11+00:00): Aha, nice. Du kan tagga in stenarna (natural=stone) så kan man undvika att nån annan är där och ritar in vägen igen. Serveringen kan väl mappas som ett kafé eller nåt?
user_4493657 (2022-06-06 17:30:32+00:00): This name does not appear in the field.
Vandalism?
bxl-forever (2022-06-07 23:18:46+00:00): Hello,

Next time, please create a single point inside the building instead of putting the tags directly on the building outline.

You told the map: "This entire building is a huge pharmacy."

Don’t worry, I fixed this one.
Glassman (2022-06-08 20:56:34+00:00): #TIP: To square a building, just select the outline then type "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122032804
ChehrehBargi (2022-10-13 10:35:46+00:00): Hello
Thank you for your help in correcting the missing parts. I also added the buildings to the school polygon
user_4493657 (2022-06-06 17:30:22+00:00): This name does not appear in the field.
Vandalism?
user_4493657 (2022-06-06 17:49:26+00:00): Which means Groß Lenka?
user_4493657 (2022-06-06 19:13:36+00:00): You can safely add these old names in the historical project. https://openhistoricalmap.org
NicoVargas (2022-06-06 17:04:09+00:00): Estimado @erickdeoliveiraleal. Las guías para mapear en Colombia desaconsejan el uso de la etiqueta highway=unclassified Conozco en persona el lugar de mapeo, y dichas carreteras corresponden al tipo Track. Agradezco reviertas las ediciones, ya que no atienden a los lineamientos de mapeo acordados en Colombia. Muchas gracias por tus aportes. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear#V.C3.ADas_desconocidas
mapcreator-guus (2022-06-13 09:53:58+00:00): They asked the UN to change their name and that got approved. Isn't that the standard that should be used here then?
https://www.un.org/en/about-us/member-states/turkiye
user_177389 (2022-06-13 10:30:40+00:00): boundary=administrative was deleted. This tag is very important.

But "Türkiye"? I can not believe it. There are no umlauts like "ü" in charset or tastatur layout.
ivanbranco (2024-01-18 12:37:12+00:00): Ciao Martj9,

mi sembra corretto segnalarti che i trail blaze che hai mappato sono stati cancellati, vedi: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146381807
Martj9 (2024-01-18 16:58:33+00:00): Sì mi hanno detto.
Visto che mi sa che ero l'unico a metterli, d'ora in poi mi risparmierò la fatica, tanto ormai sono persi. Di sicuro non ho voglia di litigare per una roba che facciamo in tre al mondo
lakedistrict (2022-06-06 20:33:59+00:00): Thanks for adding these! For future reference, local names can be put in the loc_name tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name (via the Tags section in the editor)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-11 14:28:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122251158 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits by a user trying to avoid https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
ovruni (2022-06-06 18:57:57+00:00): En este conjunto de cambios, de manera similar al anterior se ha agregado un place=town [0] no existente en esa zona, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios. Si tiene dudas sobre el uso de etiquetas por favor contacte con la comunidad peruana en https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA/Caracter%C3%ADsticas_cartogr%C3%A1ficas
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:13:32+00:00): ok
SaldañaFord (2022-09-09 15:14:56+00:00): Si existe, el mapa esta fdesactualizado
Jrachi (2022-06-07 06:03:39+00:00): Ciao.
Hai dimenticato di assegnare il ruolo guidepost ai guidepost che hai aggiunto alle relazioni 582 e 582A
Martj9 (2022-06-07 10:55:03+00:00): Giusto

Aggiungo
adrianojbr (2022-06-09 16:11:04+00:00): 👍
Dino Michelini (2022-09-12 15:11:53+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che alcune strade sono disegnate dentro edifici. Puoi correggere? Grazie
vbertola (2022-09-12 16:11:52+00:00): Non saprei, non le ho disegnate io, ho solo sistemato l'altra parte della via.
Kovoschiz (2022-06-07 10:48:11+00:00): Please stop your damaging deletes. There have been complaints about your wrong "fix".
GunSmoker (2022-06-09 08:50:50+00:00): О, не я один их добавляю :)
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Kovoschiz (2022-06-07 13:07:41+00:00): Please don't randomly connect and draw.
letihu (2022-06-27 18:24:55+00:00): Hast du hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1067251765/history
vielleicht die tags vergessen ;-)
Skyhead (2022-06-28 20:17:48+00:00): Entschuldigung, ich habe wirklich vergessen das einzutragen. Ich habe es nachgetragen (landuse=farmland)
(und bei der Gelegenheit noch ein paar ungemappte Gebiete ausgefüllt.
Viele Grüße
Skyhead
nbguy (2022-06-07 18:10:48+00:00): I'm curious why the san antonio region extends to almost houston and worth worth but also includes austin?
Jocelyn (2022-06-07 20:13:24+00:00): These relations for Highway Patrol were generated from this pdf: https://www.dps.texas.gov/sites/default/files/documents/sunset/documents/att12.0_dpsregboundaries.pdf

or here: https://www.dps.texas.gov/section/about-dps

Do you think there is an error in the relations I've pushed to OSM?
nbguy (2022-06-07 20:18:25+00:00): I'm not sure. Maybe it's how open street map delegates information. For example, if you find University of Texas At Austin, then `query features` (on a computer, right click menu) then the Police shows up as San Antonio Regional. I'm just a regular user who contributes too so I'm not sure who to ask to be certain.
Jocelyn (2022-06-07 20:38:03+00:00): I see, and I understand why it looks strange.

I've also seen these Highway Patrol Regions called with North/South/... Would it be more correct?

(I don't live in Texas, so I don't really know how these regions are usually called)
nbguy (2022-06-07 21:03:56+00:00): No worries! That's a great suggestion. I think if it was named like Texas DPS Region 1-6, then it would more clear. The PDF only lists numeric regions and not cardinal directions. If I saw "DPS" in the query features results then I would immediately know it's state police and not local police which is where I was getting confused as a user of OSM.
Jocelyn (2022-06-07 21:16:11+00:00): I've changed the name of the relation - it should now be clearer.
Trevor_1 (2022-06-07 21:36:41+00:00): Are you sure these should be added to OSM?
Trevor_1 (2022-06-07 21:42:07+00:00): It's better to discuss this with a group before making large changes like this. Are you on Slack?
Jocelyn (2022-06-08 17:14:13+00:00): I'm not aware of any Slack channel for OSM, but I can connect if needed. I'm also on Matrix/IRC.

About these relations: they have a meaning, are stable, and can be useful, so I don't see why they shouldn't be on OSM. I agree that the tags can be discussed.
Trevor_1 (2022-06-08 23:23:50+00:00): Hi! For the US, the Slack channel is https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
It's probably fine, but it might be good to double check with the group.
eggie (2022-06-06 18:59:52+00:00): Hi Steijner.. Please use the present addressnode

Ik merged the info
Greetz
eggie
eggie (2022-06-06 19:02:57+00:00): merged info with the present addressnode
maraf24 (2022-06-08 19:12:09+00:00): The correct name is "Powiatowy Ośrodek Dokumentacji Geodezyjnej i Kartograficznej".
Budynek C is localization description.
VLD529 (2022-06-10 10:44:31+00:00): Dziękuję za zmodyfikowanie części „Budynek C” przy użyciu tagu „ref”.
Syl (2022-06-07 15:07:14+00:00): Bonjour, il s'agit d'un évènement temporaire ou c'est un commerce ?
Julbus (2022-06-16 17:47:46+00:00): Un évènement annuel
Syl (2022-06-17 04:53:44+00:00): Du coup ça n'a pas sa place dans OpenStreetMap, je viens de le supprimer.
Frederic1971 (2022-06-17 17:54:31+00:00): D'accord
eggie (2022-06-06 19:01:15+00:00): Please use the right format for the postal code..
	1054BT
I will fix it.

gr eggie
SHARCRASH (2022-06-06 17:34:43+00:00): + new elements
km2bp (2022-06-06 21:10:21+00:00): Są komary?   :-)
grelus (2022-06-07 05:04:10+00:00): to dane z majówki...wtedy nie było :D
fkv (2022-06-07 11:49:31+00:00): Angepasst an was? Das ist erst 2 Wochen her, dass ich dort alles genau gemappt habe! Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass sich seither viel verändert hat.
bergradler69 (2022-06-07 16:39:52+00:00): Ich bin am Wochenende dort gewesen und bin mir recht sicher, dass es so passt. Wenn du aber bedenken hast, kannst du es canceln. Die Gegend ist leider noch immer gesperrt ...
fkv (2022-06-07 16:54:47+00:00): Gesperrt war es vor 2 Wochen auch schon, aber nur mit Zäunen, an denen man vorbei konnte. Kein Betretungsverbot. Auf den Tafeln steht immer noch "Betreten auf eigene Gefahr". Anscheinend wollen die Betreiber die Besucher nicht verärgern, sondern sich nur gegen Klagen absichern, wenn was passiert.
Ich weiß nicht sicher, wie weit der Zaun nach Süden ging, aber sicher nicht bis auf den Asphaltweg, mit dem du ihn verbunden hast.
bergradler69 (2022-06-07 17:04:56+00:00): Ich hab das so interpretiert, dass die Zäune mutwillig zur Seite geschoben wurde, kann aber auch anders sein ... Der Zaun war sicher länger, ob er er bis zur Brücke ging bin ich mir nicht sicher - kann aber durchaus so sein, wie du das schreibst ...
fkv (2022-06-08 04:29:55+00:00): Im Westen (auf der Grotteninsel) hätten die Besucher viel Kraft aufwenden müssen um den Zaun zu verbiegen, und im Osten müsste ein Abschnitt gestohlen worden sein um die Lücke zu schaffen. Also ich habe den Eindruck, dass die Betreiber absichtlich diese Lücken gelassen haben, damit Leute, die von einer Seite irgendwie reingekommen sind, auf der anderen Seite nicht eingesperrt sind. Ich hab mir meine Fotos nochmal angeschaut und bin überzeugt, dass der Zaun vor deinem Edit näher an der Realität war, also revertiere ich ihn. Dafür trage ich dann noch die Holzzäune ein, die mir jetzt auf den Fotos aufgefallen sind. Vom Rastplatz aus hab ich den Zaun nach SW gar nicht gesehen, weil alles so verwachsen ist.
fkv (2022-06-08 04:30:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122096974 where the changeset comment is: revert 122037674
bergradler69 (2022-06-08 06:18:55+00:00): alles klar, danke!
felipeeugenio (2022-06-06 19:03:14+00:00): Hola. Lamentablemente no tiene mucha cabida este tipo de mapeos en OSM, pues no son comprobables en terreno y no son entidades oficiales. Lo que si sería ultil es saber como se llaman los barrios y donde está la sede de la junta. 

saludos y gracias
Rodrigo CA (2022-06-06 19:29:45+00:00): Hola, estoy de acuerdo, solo estaba experimentando pero en realidad no quería hacer cambios públicos sino que un mapa para mi, para marcar el área de la junta de vecinos para documentar/mapear los actos delictuales que han estado ocurriendo ultimamente. Ahora estoy tratando de hacerlo con https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/, la idea es generar un mapa personalizado, para publicarlo o embeberlo en algún blog o sitio para uso de los vecinos.
felipeeugenio (2022-06-06 19:46:30+00:00): Hola Rodrigo
No existe el concepto de mapa personalizado en OSM y menos el hacer experimientos. Si quieres agregar capas personales en OSM debes extraer la información y la puedes agregar en capas propias, como lo hacen cientos de empresas. Probablemente Umap te ayude con eso. Yo por lo menos no lo conozco. gracias
Saludos
adrianojbr (2022-06-09 16:10:42+00:00): 👍
adrianojbr (2022-06-09 16:11:39+00:00): 👍
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-17 00:01:53+00:00): whats this?
adrianojbr (2022-06-09 16:13:20+00:00): 👍
Leo Slager (2022-06-08 16:15:37+00:00): Hi DutchBiker40,
Een enkele container wordt aangeduid met amenity=waste_disposal.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_disposal

Een transfer_station bestaat meestal uit meerdere 40-foot containers.
ik pas het even aan.
Leo Slager (2022-06-08 16:16:37+00:00): En dan verschijnt er ook een symbool op de standaard kaart.
kubahahaha (2022-06-06 18:54:57+00:00): Obniżyłem do residential cały odcinek od Ronda Grzegórzeckiego do ronda Grunwaldzkiego. Sam miałem wątpliwości czy to poprawna zmiana, ale ta droga nie ma żadnego skrzyżowania z drogą wyższej kategorii.
Yunkers (2022-06-07 13:51:36+00:00): Ja bym tak nie zrobił, Starowiślna jest tetriary - obecne otagowanie wygląda jakby nie dało się wyjechać ze Starowiślnej w stronę centrum/ATW drogą tetriary, a da się, wystarczy zrobić nawrotkę przy Wielopole (i ludzie tak robią robiąc od uwagę wieczne korki w tamtym miejscu)
kubahahaha (2022-06-07 14:15:27+00:00): O tym nie pomyślałem, racja. To zaraz podniosę od nawrotki do Grunwaldzkiego, dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi, bo właśnie mi też to nie do końca pasowało.
APneunzehn74 (2022-10-02 11:11:17+00:00): Hallo diesen Weg habe ich geändert zu von highway=footway zu highway=path. An einem footway müssen entsprechende Schilder stehen. Siehe Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=footway

LG APneunzehn74
BodoW (2022-10-02 12:24:47+00:00): Ich komm mit der korrekten Klassifizierung immer wieder mal ins Gehege, sorry.
Danke für die Anpassung!
APneunzehn74 (2022-10-02 12:47:09+00:00): Kein Problem, im Grunde ist es ja trotzdem ein Weg.
LG
MxxCon (2022-06-07 22:30:21+00:00): None of the satellite imagery shows this road layout.🤔 Is that accurate?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122039622
user_5359 (2022-06-09 10:45:34+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the key ref:Coralie? Why don't you use the existing ref:operator key?
mga_geo (2022-06-09 12:35:31+00:00): Un arrêt de bus peut être desservi par plusieurs réseaux de transport et chaque réseau de transport a sa propre référence.
gpserror (2022-06-14 14:18:37+00:00): Hi again,
Looks like The Dog Pawlour was already tagged as well, however it was not completely tagged and not named properly, perhaps that's why it seems like it was missing.  Need to merge the two info together, let me know if you don't understand what I mean.
gpserror (2022-06-19 12:09:23+00:00): I added shop=groomer to the old tagging and took out the duplicate tag.  Take a look/no further action is needed.
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-06-06 19:48:56+00:00): Hello, please don't put "Residential Home" in the "name" tag. Thanks.
gpserror (2022-06-13 20:41:32+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMaps.
I saw your edit here and it appears to be a duplicate.  The building is already tagged as a bakery shop for ButterCream.  May want to double check the existing data and clean up redundant data.  Thanks!
gpserror (2022-06-19 12:10:44+00:00): Take a look at the existing building that is tagged Buttercream - I cleaned up the duplicate, no further action is needed,
Thierry1030 (2022-09-04 17:11:16+00:00): Hello Jhowie,
With this changeset you removed the description and outdoor_seating tag.
Do you know why? Was it an accident? Could you correct this?
Thank you in advance.
Thierry
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:06:01+00:00): Hi, I think i removed it by accident. What should i add to it?
Thierry1030 (2023-01-22 16:10:18+00:00): no worries. bxl-forever restored the outdoor_seating tag and I just restored the description tag
Steffons (2022-06-14 16:09:07+00:00): Bitte Informationen zur Beleuchtung taggen
Steffons (2022-06-14 16:17:33+00:00): Bitte bei highway=footway auch die width aggen (s. Ausfüllhilfe)
Steffons (2022-06-14 16:28:21+00:00): Bitte das Schild an die korrespondierende Linie taggen
Branko Kokanovic (2022-06-07 19:28:44+00:00): Здраво, видим да си померио границу https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235809009. Да ли имаш неки извор који си користио за ово? Питам пошто смо ми користили податке катастра, па можда можемо да упоредимо катастре? Ми смо увезли све податке за сва насеља у Србији и ускладили са осталим државама које имају отворене катастре. Ако Македонија има нешто, дај да попричамо! Ако нема, онда бих ревертовао ово. Више детаља има овде: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/RGZ_Import. Благодарам:)

Hi, I see you moved national boundary https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235809009. What source you used for this movement? I am asking since we used open data from cadastre, so maybe we can compare these datasets? We imported data for all settlements in Serbia and adjusted border with all countries that do have open data in cadastres. If Macedonia do have something similar, let's discuss! If there is not, I will revert this change. More details here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Serbia/RGZ_Import. Thanks in advance
Oskarst_ (2023-09-28 18:11:44+00:00): Hei, ser at way 1067293597 ligger helt for seg sjøl uten at den vises i N50 eller har nevneverdig aktivitet i Strava Heatmap. Kan den fjernes?
Wulfmorn (2023-09-28 19:59:45+00:00): Kanskje er en gammel sti av noe slag. Sikkert ingen som blir veldig lei seg hvis den forsvinner.
Christian Madsen (2023-09-28 21:24:57+00:00): Har fjernet den. Det er etablert nye stier i området.
Josef73 (2022-07-24 05:56:00+00:00): Hallo, wann hat die Schloss-Schenke offen? Hier sind nur die Ruhetage angeben. Gibt es für die Öffnungstage auch Uhrzeiten?
pasbi (2022-07-24 09:05:50+00:00): Hallo!
So steht es auf dem Schild.
Die Inhaber reduzieren ihr Angebot kontinuierlich und wollen in absehbarer Zeit ganz zusperren.
Ich erkundige mich mal bei der Stammkundschaft, ob es aktuell sowas wie Öffnungszeiten gibt.
pasbi (2022-07-24 10:27:16+00:00): Siehe
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124003949
Josef73 (2022-07-24 11:16:10+00:00): Danke für's anpassen.
TheShiningAlbatross (2022-06-06 20:29:32+00:00): Used Esri World Imagery and Mapillary for changeset.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122042563
MelancholicSlav (2022-06-07 20:08:31+00:00): Hi there, welcome to OSM and congratulations on making your first edit! In the future, you should avoid abbreviating street names like you did here as full spellings are preferred when they are verifiably correct. 

(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions#Don't_use_abbreviations)
DaveF (2022-06-08 13:45:45+00:00): Hi
What form does this fire hydrant take?
Why would the authorities install one right next to a river?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9799906911
MaGIStokrat (2022-06-07 12:32:48+00:00): Hallo TaurusCB,

auch hier noch eine Anmerkung (gilt ebenso für die Fw Sachsendorf).

Der Hubschrauberlandeplatz war mE (und lt. der Wiki Beschreibung) richtig getaggt mit "aeroway=helipad"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:aeroway%3Dhelipad

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:emergency%3Dlanding_site
wäre dagegen in diesen Fällen unpassend.

In der Standardkarte wird dieses Objekt nun auch nicht mehr dargestellt. 
Daher die Frage, was Dich zu der Änderungen bewogen hat, da das Wiki ja eig. recht klar die "bisherige" Version beschreibt & unterstützt.

Gruß MaGIStokrat
george1201 (2022-06-06 21:47:27+00:00): Korrektur: Meine Ortsbegehung betraf nur den Abschnitt zwischen Langer Weg und den Treppen auf Höhe von Hausnr. 81.
frasty (2022-06-07 18:10:27+00:00): Ciao,
questa 14226052 relazione route=bicycle che cosa sarebbe? Mancano tag che la identifichino, come network, name, operator e magari state=proposed (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:state), se il caso. Così non ha molto senso.

ciao
picchiov (2022-06-08 04:21:23+00:00): Ciao! Si avendola percorsa in bicicletta, trovandola su strade poco traffico e avendo trovato diversi ciclisti a percorrela ho pensato aggiungerla così come ho visto fare fatto diverse volte in percorsi mtb nell'area del lago di Bracciano. Non fa parte di network ma di esperienza personale. Sarebbe meglio porla come percorso Mtb. Non sapevo di questa key proposed. Se serve la immetto, se crea intralcio posso togliere tutta la relazione, anche se sarebbe utile per molti cicloturisti. Se serve allego traccia gpx.

Grazie, buona giornata
picchiov (2022-06-08 06:53:03+00:00): L'unica fonte esterna all'esperienza personale é stata la Strava Heatmap (https://www.strava.com/heatmap#7.00/-120.90000/38.36000/hot/all ) vedendo le strade più percose dai ciclisti.

Penso anche questa sia una fonte abbastanza attendibile.
frasty (2022-06-08 09:11:50+00:00): Percorsi di qualsiasi tipo vanno mappati solo se indicati da segnaletica o comunque in qualche modo riconducibili  ad una rete e con un ente che li mantiene o, al limite, si potrebbe trattare di percorsi con una riconosciuta rilevanza storica. Altrimenti chiunque potrebbe mappare percorsi arbitrari, pur se in buona fede. Per questo sono sufficienti le tracce pubbliche/private gpx. Anche in Strava ci sono soltanto aggregate le tracce degli utenti ma un utilizzo de facto non definisce da solo una route. Vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes
Francamente eliminerei la relazione
Ciao!
frasty (2022-06-08 09:20:28+00:00): Per quanto riguarda il tag state=proposed, credo che comunque sia da utilizzare solo se la route è da intendersi come eventuale futuro percorso ufficiale, vedi la ciclovia tirrenica BI16 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2163392
picchiov (2022-06-08 10:48:34+00:00): Va bene, grazie! Appena posso tolgo la relazione

Buona giornata
Trevor_1 (2022-06-07 13:18:41+00:00): Hi, can you try to make your changesets smaller in the future? This one covers a very large area across multiple continents.
Emilius123 (2022-06-07 13:51:56+00:00): I am a dictionary. While I do contain words, I cannot read, so please don't even bother writing changeset comments.
Trevor_1 (2022-06-07 14:07:39+00:00): Being uncooperative can get you banned.
Emilius123 (2022-06-07 14:33:56+00:00): Says who? Where on this page is this information stated? Are you making stuff up just to scare me?
Emilius123 (2022-06-07 14:37:28+00:00): yeah sry, will comply
Emilius123 (2022-06-07 14:38:02+00:00): Sorry for being rudesdfjkfdijsgfdigdfgdfgssdffsdy
opendcc (2022-06-08 12:37:04+00:00): Hello, OSM is a community work and being inpolite will surely bring you a good standing :-)
Shall we revert this changeset? Reason: undiscussed mechanical edit ...
SomeoneElse (2022-06-11 15:03:35+00:00): @Cambridge Dictionary / Emilius123 : What you have appeared to have done here is to have changed hospices from "social_facility:for=terminal_ill" to "social_facility:for=terminally_ill".  This is a reasonable edit, in that it's correcting a misspelling / grammar error, and not open to misinterpretation.
However, creating a new account, pretending to be dictionary and generally being a bit of a idiot don't really help.  It might have been nice to mention it on the tagging mailing list, to warn people that the edit was going to happen (and in case someone knows of another meaning for the term that might explain the two values - sometimes people merge tags when they shouldn't because there really is a different meaning).
SomeoneElse (2022-06-11 15:05:18+00:00): @opendcc Are you aware of any problematic changes in here? Are you aware of any changes that weren't "social_facility:for=terminal_ill" to "social_facility:for=terminally_ill"?
SomeoneElse (2022-06-11 15:06:16+00:00): @1T-money Please try and be nice, to avoid outing the inner "Kevin the teenager" in other mappers :)