piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-07-10 23:23:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
Владимир К (2017-06-23 13:06:38+00:00): всё хорошо, только разрывать не надо было. блок и есть блок. надо только проставить доступ
jaap de vries (2017-06-26 06:07:09+00:00): Ben je bekent met deze opmerking? http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/720576 
Zou je als je iets toevoegt ook willen reageren bij opmerkingen? Dan weten de mensen die daar wel reageren hoe de vork in de steel zit.
Geldt niet alleen bij deze maar ook bij andere opmerkingen.

Jaap
jaap de vries (2017-06-26 06:18:47+00:00): Ik zie ook dat je op de van Riemstraat nr 3 hebt toegevoegd. Hier zijn ze deze week begonnen met de fundering en ligt kadastraal gezien tegenover nr 8. Pas je dit even aan?
de vries (2017-06-26 06:40:46+00:00): Ik heb de panden toegevoegd op basis van de bag en PDOK luchtfoto's. Als er toevallig ook en opmerking is waarop ik niet gereageerd heb, dan mag je er van uitgaan dat ik die opmerking niet kende. 

Wanneer je op basis van locale waarneming concludeert dat een geïmporteerd gebouw niet helemaal klopt ben je vrij dit zelf aan te passen.

mvg
jaap de vries (2017-06-26 06:42:35+00:00): http://www.funda.nl/nieuwbouw/ijzendoorn/project-49742478-ijzendoorn-west/#foto-5
damjang (2017-06-30 09:52:37+00:00): Hi! Can I ask how do you find this housenumbers? To me it seems rather strange, so I'm asking here...
Thank you
Elektra Web (2017-06-30 13:03:45+00:00): I'm working for Poste Italiane as a mailman ;)
damjang (2017-06-30 22:14:52+00:00): Perfect! Thank you!
MadelNL (2017-09-07 05:56:43+00:00): Kun je mij eens uitleggen waarom je de, door mij, eerder ingetekende versie van de N300 voor een groot deel verwijderd hebt, om hem vervolgens weer opnieuw in te tekenen?
Het betreft niet alleen dit stuk, maar het valt mij op dat je dit bij meerdere stukken van de N300 gedaan hebt.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-07-10 23:23:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-07-10 23:23:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50188052 where the changeset comment is: Following discussion on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50130355 , reverting some problematic imports in India.
tbm (2017-06-25 21:04:50+00:00): This looks like an incorrect edit. Can you please double check?
tbm (2017-06-30 10:00:42+00:00): Removed.
highflyer74 (2022-12-19 12:27:34+00:00): Moin!

Ist schon etwas her, aber bei dem von dir hier in eine MP-Relation umgemappten Parkplatz stellt sich die Frage, warum du ein MP gewählt hast. Kannst du dich da noch dran erinnern?

Das Wiki sieht so etwas nicht vor (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking) und nach meinem Verständnis handelt es sich bei dem südlichen Teil um einen Parkplatz, den man auch einfacher als Fläche mappen kann.

Viele Grüße aus HB!
Enzyklopädix (2024-10-26 18:34:47+00:00): Weiß ich nicht mehr, vermutlich wegen der vieln Flächen. War ohnehin ungewöhnlich, dass sier jemand alle Parkplätze einzeln eingetragn hatte...
user_5359 (2017-09-09 15:24:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-06-23 13:06:56+00:00): Ummm.... Why are you adding sqkm tag? If you need to know the area of a country you can just do a geographic calculation? Have you checked the the values you entered match the currently mapped areas? What happens if there is a difference?
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-29 15:26:45+00:00): zerkniesz na http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1188621 ?
rowers2 (2017-11-07 12:33:20+00:00): Odpowiedziałem w notatce
rowers2 (2017-11-07 14:31:11+00:00): Prośba o posyłanie mi takich info na priva bo bardzo rzadko przeglądam komentarze do changesetów. Powodów jest wiele w tym ten że nie dostaję powiadomień o nowych wpisach.Zatem gdyby było coś ważnego to kanał na priva jest najszybszy i tak od lat do mnie piszą koledzy z kraju i  zagranicy.Koledzy nie odpisujący na komentarze do changesetów mają podobny stosunek co ja do tego kanału bo wiele o tym rozmawialiśmy.
Służy on zbyt często do wylewania frustracji różnym oszołomom którzy nie chcą rozwiązać problemu i kulturalnie się porozumieć (co większość robi) a wykorzystując, że to forum publiczne chcą po prostu komuś dokopać.

Zastanawiamy się od lat czy te komentarze więcej złego narobiły czy dobrego.
Czy łączą we współpracy czy dzielą.
Powtarzam jest grupa rozsadnych osób która innym nie szkodzi i w tej czy w wielu innych kwestiach jesteśmy zgodni.
Mam nadziej że z czasem przejrzysz na oczy dlatego na razie nie odopowiadam na Twoje niesprawiedliwe oceny co do mojego stosunku do osób które dały się poznać od najgorszej strony.Zakładam że pewnych rzeczy nie dostrzegasz. ale nie musisz choć z tym stażem pewnie powinieneś.
Ja swoje zdanie buduję konfrontując swoje spostrzeżenie z opiniami kolegów z wieloletnim stażem .Jestem dorosły i nie muszę się skarżyć. Zawsze znajdzie się ktoś kto podkłada nogę ale każde chamstwo z czasem wraca do autora i często z nawiązką.
Zatem jeśli masz za mało danych nie wyciągaj pochopnych wniosków.Jest grono osób w którym wiele kwestii jest obgadanych.Nie ma potrzeby tego roztrząsać lub nagłaśniać no chyba że cie to interesuje to słyszę obszerniejszymi wyjaśnieniami ale już na priva
GinaroZ (2017-06-27 19:09:07+00:00): Hi, please do not add features which are already mapped, thanks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-28 07:09:21+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1744505211/history has access:hgv that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using hgv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv ) be fitting at least equally well?
gzin (2024-02-28 18:57:18+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the hint, I've changed to hgv=no now.
Supaplex (2017-06-23 14:56:20+00:00): 不是建築
SafwatHalaby_bot (2017-06-23 11:28:42+00:00): Total names copies: 77
Total name to name:en: 31
Total name:he to name: 1
Total name to name:he: 39
Total name:ar to name: 0
Total name to name:ar: 6
Whitespace fixes: 0
Total scanned: 927
Total unhandled errors: 838
Polarbear-repair (2017-07-15 23:58:37+00:00): DE: revert all 4 CS by 'woelleraner', a sock puppet of wbmstr; for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects w/o specifying a valid source; for giving non-existent/fake/alibi sources; moving placenodes w/o reason; edits wars; see userblock 1377
Revert in CS 50315733
Supaplex (2017-07-09 18:03:35+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Reza_koulivand (2019-09-13 06:41:59+00:00): سلام، مگه اسم این شهرک محمدیه نیست؟ و اسم قدیمیش زیباشهر؟ الان هم محمدیه ثبت شده هم زیباشهر؟
Goffredo (2017-06-23 18:50:10+00:00): Ciao, i nomi non sono descrizioni. I tag che hai inserito descrivono già l'oggetto, io toglierei il nome, visto che non è il nome proprio della telecamera... Ciao
Polarbear-repair (2017-07-15 23:58:29+00:00): DE: revert all 4 CS by 'woelleraner', a sock puppet of wbmstr; for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects w/o specifying a valid source; for giving non-existent/fake/alibi sources; moving placenodes w/o reason; edits wars; see userblock 1377
Revert in CS 50315733
Polarbear-repair (2017-07-15 23:58:24+00:00): DE: revert all 4 CS by 'woelleraner', a sock puppet of wbmstr; for large-scale renaming of churches and related objects w/o specifying a valid source; for giving non-existent/fake/alibi sources; moving placenodes w/o reason; edits wars; see userblock 1377
Revert in CS 50315733
joe egg (2017-06-25 11:28:07+00:00): This is odd . Sometime between 2013 and now this path has been downgraded by council . Would it be better shown as " Footpath " , rather than "path"  which would show up more defined than a dotted red line and be more representative of its status as a tarmac track.
Hildrop92 (2017-06-25 11:43:34+00:00): Yes, thinking about it that would make more sense to have, as it would make it stick out from the dirt paths around it.
trigpoint (2017-06-23 14:23:02+00:00): Hi Martin, is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502622232 really a park? 
It looks a very odd place for a park, and aerial imagery suggests it isn't.
Also it is bad practice to join areas such as this to the centreline of roads. The area will end at the edge and should be mapped as such.
Cheers Phil
Martin Wynne (2017-06-23 15:34:17+00:00): Hi Phil,
I use "park" for any public green space with trees or shrubs, because there doesn't seem to be any other designation available. I have noticed the same used in lots of other places on OSM.  "Grass" is ok for plain grass, but this clearly isn't that - see: https://goo.gl/maps/LPuDqLwdNrP2

It's a "land-use" boundary, so you can't have a boundary without something on the other side, otherwise it wouldn't be a boundary. If taken only to the kerb, you then need a "road surface" land use for the middle bit, and I haven't been able to find one. It would be a massive waste of effort anyway, because OSM draws roads symbolically over the top without regard to the actual width. In that circumstance, taking boundaries to the road centre-line is the sensible thing to do, and produces the neatest results at different zoom levels.

cheers,

Martin.
chillly (2017-06-23 17:02:11+00:00): mapping landuse boundaries to the centre lines of roads is not good practice. Your explanation sounds good, but in practice we don't do it. Creating a map image is only one use of OSM data and whatever your renderer of choice does to make the result neatest is not a good justification. A park, or any other landuse, does not extend to the centre of a road. There is an edge before the road begins. At that edge there may be a fence, a kerb, a footway or whatever. If you insist on there being a boundary between two landuse features (which seems pedantic) you could add landuse=highway to describe the extent of the land set aside for the highway and all its features. 
A map is a representation of the world. That representation needs guidelines to work well. We do not attach landuse to a highway. That guideline is widely followed and I suggest that you, as a new contributor, might like to follow it too.
EdLoach (2017-06-23 17:12:05+00:00): Personally I'd have mapped it as an area of (mostly) grass and perhaps added an occasional natural=tree node (similarly when I mark an area as wood or forest I don't usually map holes for every clearing in the trees). I also don't like to think about the amount of time I've had to spend ungluing landuse area from road centrelines (in this case I'd have probably extended the residential area across the residential roads to the edge of the grass area).
trigpoint (2017-06-23 17:17:04+00:00): Please do not tag for the render, a park should only be used for area that are really parks. Mapping is not about making something appear a particular colour on one particular renderer. If I had brought my grandkids here because OSM says there is a park then they and I will be pretty pissed off.
From your description this should more likely be landuseor or landcover=scub.

Cheers Phil
Martin Wynne (2017-06-23 17:24:45+00:00): Hi Ed, You wrote " (in this case I'd have probably extended the residential area across the residential roads to the edge of the grass area)."

This surely illustrates my point - a road is no more a residential area than it is a park.

I found this on the Wiki: "If you choose to let a landuse area end at a road, you have a choice of either re-using the nodes of the way representing the road, or drawing the boundary using new nodes next to the road. Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages, and neither is clearly "wrong" as long as highway landuse is not mapped." See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential

cheers,

Martin.
trigpoint (2017-06-23 17:24:55+00:00): Hi Martin
I forgot to say we do not have permission to use g.maps so please do not look at it, use it to check something, use it to illustrate something. Mapping must be done from what you have seen by being there, imagery we have permission to use, and out of copyright maps and information.
Martin Wynne (2017-06-23 17:33:26+00:00): Hi Phil,

It is clearly not scrub. There is a suggestion on the Wiki to make it village_green for public green space, but that doesn't sound right here.

If you want to visit a proper municipal park, it is likely to have a name, such as "Jubilee Gardens" or whatever.

p.s. I have started reverting the SVR to "preserved" but I'm not happy about it. For example it makes the platforms much more prominent than the tracks when zoomed out, which looks silly.

cheers,

Martin.
Martin Wynne (2017-06-23 17:43:35+00:00): p.s. I have been there. I use Google Streetview only to confirm my memory of what I saw. Mostly I use OS OpenData to align buildings, water-courses, etc. Also the NLS 25K maps are very useful. The Bing aerial is very poor quality for seeing details.

Will the NLS 25" historic maps ever be available in the editor? That would be great. Often farm tracks, field boundaries, public footpaths, etc. haven't changed for 100 years.

cheers,

Martin.
SomeoneElse (2017-06-23 14:28:15+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy
Nakaner-repair (2017-07-31 21:45:05+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50733982
user_5359 (2017-06-23 16:17:13+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kann bei Container auch Glasscheiben einwerfen oder ist dies ein Container mit runden Einwurf mit Glasflaschen (recycling:glas_bottles=yes)?
jc86035 (2017-07-10 10:16:42+00:00): Do you have data for the other 8 districts?
Fischkopp0815 (2017-06-24 03:31:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160902990

Ich vermute,dass die RKiSH nicht das ganze ehemalige Telekom-Gebäude belegt. Darum würde ich die RKiSH  Verwaltung vom Gebäude trennen und an einen eigenen Punkt im Gebäude setzen zusätzlich mit dem Tag office=company.Ist das neu hier? Auf der Website finde ich Esmarchstraße 50 beim WKK.

https://www.rkish.de/kontakt.html

Hier 2 sehr niedrige Gebäude.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167964371

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167176675

Hier ist doch wohl eher building:levels=1 gemeint, oder sind die ebenerdig. Außerdem fehlt da an beiden Gebäuden jeweils ein Tag, das die Funktion beschreibt (wie oben office=company). Mir fällt da aber auch gerade nichts passendes ein.
Commodoortje (2017-06-23 18:42:34+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
eggie (2017-06-23 17:12:37+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
baptistemm (2017-06-23 14:33:01+00:00): Bonjour,

je vois que vous debutez, si vous voulez faire des essais sans craindre de casser ou mal faire, il existe des serveurs de tests ou les données sont effacées régulièrement.

la  page wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing (en anglais par contre) détaille cela.

Bonne continuation
eggie (2017-06-23 19:20:06+00:00): Dag Platenaer. Je kunt het beste even dat water zo neerleggen dat het niet op het Farmland ligt. Je zou het Farmland dus om het water kunnen leggen. Water is altijd lastig mappen in het begin.
Ítalo Paixão (2017-06-23 14:37:25+00:00): Nome correto da fazenda: Fazenda Água Azul. Acabei escrevendo errado e não consegui editar. Solicito que editem com o nome correto ou excluam por favor.
santamariense (2017-06-23 17:34:38+00:00): Olá e bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap (OSM). Antes de mais nada, comunico que temos uma comunidade de colaboradores do OSM no Telegram e já te convido a participar (https://web.telegram.org/#/im?p=@OSMBrasil_Comunidade).
Para editar você tem que fazer assim... no site principal clica em editar (ou clique neste link http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&node=4932418654#map=18/-2.49855/-48.48816) > Seleciona o ponto coo nome da fazenda para abrir do lado esquerdo as opções > Vai no submenu "todas as etiquetas", clica em "+" e adiciona "place" embaixo de "name" e "farm" embaixo de "Agua Azul"
Deverá ficar assim (http://i.imgur.com/XNt5D22.png) então é só clicar em Salvar quando você acabar suas edições.
Se por qualquer motivo tu não quer ou não pode fazer, a gente corrige para ti.
Bons mapeamentos,
usuário santamariense
dónal (2017-06-23 14:14:37+00:00): reverts changesets 48546507 and 48546615.
JamesKingdom (2017-06-23 15:18:34+00:00): Well watching the video, is it about that lift, so I'm assuming that's where he got the information from about the levels, etc. So it might not be an accident?
Ítalo Paixão (2017-06-23 14:35:03+00:00): Nome correto da fazenda: Fazenda Ademar. Acabei escrevendo errado e não consegui editar. Solicito que editem com o nome correto ou excluam por favor.
Ítalo Paixão (2017-06-23 14:39:03+00:00): -1.80548113847536,-48,9124579935057 LAT E LONG CORRETOS.
Commodoortje (2017-06-23 15:01:59+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-06-23 15:06:53+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik je wat geholpen.
De wegen heb ik omgezet naar highway=residential en de naam toegevoegd.
Gebouwen importeren we vanaf 2014 middels een import vanuit BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) Mocht je nog lokaties weten waar nieuwbouw/verbouw/aanbouw/herbouw zou moeten geschieden laat dit dan weten op het forum.
Je kunt hier een verzoek doen voor import van gebouwen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=651840#p651840
Er valt nog veel te verbeteren in OSM en je was op een zeer goede weg!!
Lees je welkomst mail even die je in een PB is verzonden.
Commodoortje (2017-06-23 15:09:26+00:00): Hier kun je zien wat ik heb gewijzigd.
Er staan nog een aantal huizen gepland, deze importeren we niet standaard.
Stel dat je huizen mist die in aanbouw zijn laat het dan gerust in het forumtopic weten.
Commodoortje (2017-06-23 15:09:36+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49773150
Vincent Feitsma (2017-06-25 09:29:07+00:00): Hee Commodoortje, bedankt voor je wijzigingen. Ik heb een woning in aanbouw in deze buurt (die er al op staat) en vond dat de betreffende info wel aanvulling verdiende. 

Ik had al het gevoel, gezien de wijzigingen die verder door jou aangebracht zijn, dat ze uit een Database kwamen. Ik ben echter direct op de Wysiwyg manier aan het werk getogen. Bedankt voor de Heads up dat het ook makkelijker kan. Korte vraag: komt de aanvulling van het water ook uit BAG? Het water langs de Hounsdyk loopt namelijk inmiddels onderaan door langs de knik, langs de Drachtsterweg omhoog en langs het fietspad onder de Drachtsterweg door, waardoor deze wijk een wateraansluiting heeft op de Tearnzer Wielen.  Dit watergedeelte staat er echter nog niet op de kaart.  

Ik zal even op de fora rond sneupen om één en ander bij te leren.
Commodoortje (2017-06-25 11:58:31+00:00): Het water had ik middels de satelliet beelden PDOK Luchtfoto 2016 Beeldmateriaal 25cm overgenomen. Ja dit kan inmiddels gedateerd zijn.
Ítalo Paixão (2017-06-23 14:36:11+00:00): Nome correto da fazenda: Fazenda Agua Viva. Acabei escrevendo errado e não consegui editar. Solicito que editem com o nome correto ou excluam por favor.
BCNorwich (2017-07-02 06:57:38+00:00): Removed duplicate building (502893780), several buildings can easily be seen here.
MikeN (2017-06-25 16:37:03+00:00): Hi, is this the current or planned speed limit change?  Signs are still up for 55mph.
Saucon Support (2017-06-26 12:48:31+00:00): Hi Mike, we had received a notice from one of our clients that I 85 Bus had a posted speed limit of 70. Since signs are still up for 55 MPH, I will revert the speed limit to 55 MPH.
karitotp (2017-06-23 18:49:47+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for contributing. Could you please confirm and share the source to change square tag to a park, even in the way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502901110) there are a clinic into a park? Thank you 
Karito
santamariense (2017-06-23 19:57:40+00:00): Yes. I search for and really the place is a park with name "Praça Professora Santinha" second a municipal law http://bit.ly/2s4wWtq

Bem vindo ao OSM, @Ricardo Valente. Temos uma comunidade no Telegram de colaboradores do OSM. Convido você a participar: https://web.telegram.org/#/im?p=@OSMBrasil_Comunidade
Ricardo Valente (2017-06-23 20:47:58+00:00): Thanks! I'll check it out
eggie (2017-06-23 17:20:24+00:00): In het verleden was je al gewaarschuwd voor het omzetten van landuse naar Leisure park. 
Toen zijn al je edits teruggedraaid. Nu doe je weer precies hetzelfde.
Ik overweeg om een je account te laten blokkeren.
Graag reactie 

Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. 
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
eggie (2017-06-23 17:24:39+00:00): Reverted due to total ignorance.. making Leisure parks out of landuse grass. Had several warnings in the past and is continuing in  spite of former warnings.
eggie (2017-06-23 17:33:49+00:00): DWG in kennis gesteld.
eggie (2017-06-23 17:34:34+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49773545
is reverted
alphensebezorger (2017-10-05 20:01:57+00:00): Hallo Chiuaua, moet de straatnaam van deze weg niet gewoon Concertweg zijn:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502904390? En op de kruising zou ik de tertiary van de Concertweg door laten lopen tot de westelijke baan van de Eisenhouwerlaan.
Chiuaua (2017-10-05 20:20:47+00:00): Je hebt helemaal gelijk. Opgelost met changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52665667.
FatPhil (2017-06-26 09:36:59+00:00): It's a sit-down food and drink place, not a bar.
Jethro10 (2017-06-26 14:27:07+00:00): Updated a "business" then if it matters? To me all that matters is there is more data that is correct. But call it what you will.
Jethro10 (2017-06-26 14:28:39+00:00): Maybe you need to have a chat with the originator of the business on OSM who called it a bar?
FatPhil (2017-06-26 22:48:15+00:00): Apologies, I was misled by the changeset data. Unfortunately it never shows what the data was before a change, and it included "<tag k="amenity" v="bar"/>", which I interpreted to mean that you had changed its amenity type. Apparently that's not the case. Apologies again for my confusion.
stefanct (2020-12-26 16:15:06+00:00): Hi, wie kommst du darauf, dass genau dieses Haus (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7352054) Wanzenöd heißt? Das ist meines Wissens nach die Bezeichnung für die Siedlung, siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2509860486
Manfred538 (2020-12-27 10:24:24+00:00): Hi, ist schon eine Weile her , aber ich hab damals die Häuser in der Siedlung NO von hier ergänzt und hier nur die Umrisse korrigiert. Hausnamen kenne ich keine und mappe sie daher auch nicht, der war schon drauf.
Bitte korrigier es wenn du dir sicher bist.
Danke!
stefanct (2020-12-27 15:18:43+00:00): Ah richtig, das hast du nur beim Erstellen des MP vom way übernommen. Das kam schon von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/22636301. Werd dort mal nachfragen, aber der Mapper war nur kurz vor 6 Jahren aktiv - dafür sehr lokal.
trial (2025-12-01 22:22:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4896118923/history : était-il nécessaire de reproduire les fote de la note originale ? ;-)