piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
geoffengland (2022-06-29 03:54:24+00:00): If you look back at the history of Rochester Ave you'll see I was the one who re-designated it to tertiary 7 years ago, therefore I believe I am liable to change it back to residential.
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:21:44+00:00): Hi,

the relation 5346192 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM will help you to prevent a new one, maybe you could update your software ?

Best regards
archie (2022-06-29 05:28:24+00:00): Hej, jag ifrågasatte inte parkeringsplatsen i sig, utan varför du valde att göra en multipolygon av den. Jag kunde inte se något som helst skäl till det, men det kanske finns omständigheter som gör att det bör vara så...
Harri-Postnord (2022-06-29 06:03:59+00:00): Hej!
Okej, såg så ut på kartbild, men ska tänka på det.
jaapsen (2022-07-04 10:34:19+00:00): Why has this been reverted? The actual road is currently paved in red-asphalt. The sign at the start also says: fietsstraat (auto te gast)
A67-A67 (2022-07-04 11:08:26+00:00): This is a fietsstraat, not a fietspad (highway=cycleway). These are two different things.

A fietsstraat is indicated by the tag cyclestreet=yes, not by changing the highway-tag to cycleway. So it had been mapped correctly.

See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cyclestreet
jaapsen (2022-07-04 17:06:27+00:00): Thank you.
nevw (2022-06-29 08:48:13+00:00): Hi
Why have you added the following tags to this building?
description=Really cool
name=not my house
nevw (2022-06-29 12:16:50+00:00): I deleted both tags
maraf24 (2022-07-04 21:53:16+00:00): Duplikat: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9854870035
maraf24 (2022-07-04 21:55:45+00:00): Dlaczego zaimportowałeś ten adres na środku pola: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9854870042 ?
charl3s (2022-07-05 02:48:34+00:00): Bo na sentinelu widać, że jest budowa lub coś w tym stylu.
charl3s (2022-07-05 02:48:59+00:00): a tamten się zduplikował bo wcześniejszy był źle wprowadzony i walidator nie krzyczał
gscscnd (2022-07-02 06:29:48+00:00): OsmAnd niestety nie obsługuje fotoradarów otagowanych na węzłach niebędących częścią drogi.
lekkir (2022-07-13 07:42:52+00:00): sugerowałem się fotoradarem, który był postawiony naprzeciw - zrobiłem w ten sam sposób. Jeśli coś schrzaniłem to proszę o poprawę...
gscscnd (2022-07-15 11:32:46+00:00): Jest zrobione prawidłowo, po prostu można to też zrobić inaczej. Aktualny sposób jest bardziej precyzyjny, tyle że niestety nieobsługiwany w OsmAndzie.
user_10241830 (2022-06-29 08:35:39+00:00): Hallo,

die Hauptsatzung der Gemeinde Echzell schreibt Grund-Schwalheim mit Bindestrich und nicht mit Deppenleerzeichen:

https://www.echzell.de/verwaltung-politik/gemeinderecht/satzungen-und-gemeinderecht/hauptsatzung-der-gemeinde-echzell.pdf?cid=4qm

Warum wird hier davon abgewichen?
lkw (2022-09-14 08:40:30+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe den Namen aus dem place node übernommen. Die Abweichung ist mir gar nicht aufgefallen.
Ich habe jetzt auf Mapillary ein Ortsschild gesucht, aber keins gefunden. Ich füge den Bindestrich hinzu.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-09 22:28:50+00:00): reverted, fake mapping
Strubbl (2022-06-29 17:41:21+00:00): Bitte beschränke deine Changeset auf eine kleinere Region!
Strubbl (2022-06-29 17:45:06+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude rechtwinklig machen. building=house ist bei freistehenden Häusern nicht korrekt, bitte informiere dich im Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Geb%C3%A4ude zu dem Gebäude-Tag
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122985986
Strubbl (2022-06-29 17:46:06+00:00): Die Sundpromenade hatte ich gestern bereits zurückgesetzt. Ich weiß nicht, warum du diese Änderung unter dem Kommentar "erzeugt Gebäude" versteckst.
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:20:43+00:00): Hi,

the relation 7135046 is empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM will help you to prevent a new one, maybe you could update your software ?

Best regards
LorenzoPesci (2022-07-07 09:38:11+00:00): l'olivo è già presente da 4 anni e non va etichettato come "monumento" ma come albero monumentale
abakus_uploader (2022-06-29 22:31:18+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
zidel (2022-06-29 21:37:48+00:00): Hei, tok en kjapp titt på endringene og klarer ikke se at du har ødelagt noe. Det at jernbanen du la til er koplet på så mange andre ting (vei, bygning, bydelsgrense) gjør at fremtidige justeringer lett kan endre mer enn det som var planlagt, så i utgangspunktet er det en grei ting unngå, men vet at iD gjør det ganske vanskelig å unngå når ting er nærme hverandre.

Velkommen til OSM.
Noen (2022-09-29 22:46:57+00:00): I iD kan du holde inne «alt»-tasten når du tegner, for å unngå å hekte det du tegner fast i andre nærliggende ting.
Frans S (2022-08-28 12:35:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions). Each building needs to be mapped individually. I reviewed most of your mappings on this project and all have the same issues.
I revert these changesets.
Please pay attention to these points:



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122987159
Frans S (2022-08-28 12:25:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested.
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Please pay attention to these points:
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped individually.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122987910
Langlaeufer (2022-06-29 10:56:40+00:00): also here, you connected a fence with a street - I guess this does not help also #tomtom.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122987936
TravetteR (2022-06-30 12:54:27+00:00): Thanks Langlaeufer, I have changed this highway way 1020253299 to barrier=fence and removed the highway tag along with the parking aisle tag which was added by MrKrisKrisu based on imagery.
Langlaeufer (2022-06-30 14:20:56+00:00): o.k. sorry, I see it was no your mistake. I can't see any fence there, only 2 (open) gates. I changed that in this way and also updated the roads. I'm still not sure about the connection of the to parking areas. There seems not to be a fence but perhaps a curb?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122987936
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-01 13:43:31+00:00): 朋友你好，备注写明做了什么编辑就可以，不要用来测试

以及 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074428112 画的确实是真实存在的建筑，但是在一次编辑中不要跨这么大的范围，不然其他编辑者看到没法进行复核。之前也有因此引起两岸冲突的情况。

望以后注意。
cyton (2022-06-29 11:55:25+00:00): Ah mist, ich kann mit vespucci nich umgehen. Danke
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122988524
kartonage (2022-06-29 12:06:20+00:00): Ach, kein Ding. :)
AmanBD (2022-08-01 12:29:21+00:00): Dear @Kmr mahim, 
Shahbazpur is not a town. There is no municipal corporation in Shahbazpur.
Shahbazpur is a village in Sarail Upazila. It is part of Shabazpur Union. See http://shahbazpurup.brahmanbaria.gov.bd/bn/site/page/TPH2-%E0%A6%8F%E0%A6%95-%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%9C%E0%A6%B0%E0%A7%87
Also there is no police station here according to http://police.brahmanbaria.gov.bd
Frans S (2022-09-10 10:27:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building and map each building individually  (with extensions).
Your mappings will be reverted.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122989161
mueschel (2022-06-30 10:30:59+00:00): Hi,
could you check this relation? It seems to have several foreign tags that shouldn't be in OSM.
fabiotofy (2022-06-29 09:13:11+00:00): dovrebbe essere limitata ai soli residenti e/o mezzi agricoli. Non è così ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122989791
borgofumo (2022-06-29 10:01:31+00:00): Fabio, in realtà da Cavazzo non ci sono cartelli specifici mentre dal Casone e da Pioverno ci sono solo cartelli di limiti di velocità e di attenzione. Allego link a una mia foto su mapillary https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=898307850738847
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122989791
Langlaeufer (2022-06-29 10:48:22+00:00): reverted; you connected a private service road with an fence.
TravetteR (2022-06-30 12:54:57+00:00): Thanks Langlaeufer, I have changed this highway way 1020253299 to barrier=fence and removed the highway tag along with the parking aisle tag which was added by MrKrisKrisu based on imagery.
balint36 (2022-08-17 17:29:42+00:00): Hi! You marked the railway line 81M as service=yard. The description (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=yard) says the service=yard tag "is used for the tracks at yard stations which are operated by the railway company itself (in difference to spur tracks)." Line 81M leaves 'Salgótarján külső' station.
As you can see in the station implementation instructions (https://www.mavcsoport.hu/sites/default/files/upload/page/salgotarjan_kulso.pdf) Salgótarján kölső has an entry signal from the line 81M although the garman description (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service%3Dyard) says service=yard doesn't have any main signal (Hauptsignalen).
So I'd like ask you one thing. Why did you delete usage=branch and change into service=yard?
balint36 (2022-08-17 17:35:18+00:00): https://www.kapella2.hu/ehuszfelulet/vonalak?vonal_id=18259645
balint36 (2022-08-18 09:40:24+00:00): Please answer my question. If you won't give a reason for the tag changing or revert the changeset by yourself then I have to do it myself because I have sources for the original version but you don't have any for the current one.
gunnar1m (2022-08-18 09:59:24+00:00): single-track line, only one main track
balint36 (2022-08-18 12:11:28+00:00): That's not an aswer for my question. Those are two separate line running parallel. There many of them in Hungary.
balint36 (2022-08-18 12:15:43+00:00): But let me another question. Do you know very well the Hungarian railway network? Just because you didn't even ask if that's okay or you didn't attach any sources that says tha old one is bad and the new one is the right one. I've provided you two of them saying othervise.
balint36 (2022-08-18 15:04:34+00:00): Okay you don't want to answer me (however you are online and making edits) and the descriptions and the provided sources prove this railway is not service=yard so I'm gonna revert is. Next time if you not sure about the rail network of MÁV (or GYSEV) in Hungary, please ask me or another Hungarian contributor about is. Thasnk.
Leo Slager (2022-06-29 10:30:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2022-06-29 10:39:08+00:00): Dag Lucas,
Je hebt hier vele adressen en fietspaden verwijderd van de kaart.
Ik kan mij niet voorstellen dat dat correct is.
Deze changeset wordt dus teruggezet.
Als een winkel inmiddels is gesloten dan kun je wel de gegevens van de winkel verwijderen maar de adresgegevens moeten blijven staan.
Een navigatie-app kan anders dat adres niet meer vinden !
Het lijkt allemaal zo eenvoudig, maar dat is het niet. Er schuilt achter de kaart een geweldige database met geografische gegevens en in de wiki staan dan een heleboel regeltjes waar aan voldaan moet worden.
We nemen je overigens niks kwalijk.
Laat je hierdoor niet ontmoedigen om verder te mappen.
Leo Slager (2022-06-29 10:57:47+00:00): Reverted with my changeset 122996577
Leo Slager (2022-06-29 10:59:37+00:00): Als de winkel gesloten is, kun je dus de gegevens van de winkel verwijderen van de adresnode. Het adres moet dus op de kaart blijven staan.
Zijn die speeltuintjes inderdaad opgeheven ?
En de fietspaden ?
Piskvor (2022-06-30 14:26:15+00:00): Zvláštně je to v RÚIANU vedený. Katastrální území se jmenuje Vestec u Prahy ( https://vdp.cuzk.cz/vdp/ruian/katastralniuzemi/781029 ), ale obec je jen Vestec ( https://vdp.cuzk.cz/vdp/ruian/obce/513458 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/436660 ). Obdobně vedle Jesenice...
Piskvor (2022-06-30 14:34:17+00:00): Podle wiki by admin_level=10 mělo být katastrální území, a admin_level=8 obec: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#10_admin_level_hodnoty_pro_konkr%C3%A9tn%C3%AD_zem%C4%9B
LuxuryCoop (2022-06-29 10:29:04+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
fkv (2022-06-29 08:46:02+00:00): Sorry, war note #3243382, nicht #2945120.
ma-rt-in (2022-06-29 18:21:53+00:00): Moin,

du hattest die Straße ja freigegeben.
Ist den auch die Krezung Süderstraße komplett fertig?
vg
kuhni74 (2024-12-08 22:40:54+00:00): Nein, liegt sie nicht, siehe basemap und ÖK50; und wo der Weg den Grat erreicht, ist es schon einiges höher (gut 2500m).
tolioalessandro (2022-07-04 09:38:12+00:00): Buongiorno,
non è così che si interiscono percorsi in OpenStreetMap. Non potete creare un nuovo sentiero per ogni percorso che caricate. Il sentiero o la strada, l'elemento fisico, è solo una, nella maggior parte dei casi è già disegnato nella mappa. Quello che potete fare è creare una relazione: ovvero selezionare tutti i tratti di sentieri, strade, etc che formano uno dei vostri percorsi e riunirli all'interno della stessa relazione.

Qui trovate alcuni info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Relation:route#Walking_routes_(also_hiking_and_pilgrimage)

Prima di intervenire sulle mappe è sempre opportuno consultare il portale wiki.openstreetmap.org per capire il modo migliore in cui intervenire.

Allo stato attuale, i percorsi come sono stati caricati, sono un atto di vandalismo informatico. Vi prego di correggere quanto prima.
Sviluppo sostenibile (2022-07-05 09:43:05+00:00): Buongiorno, 
grazie per avermi fatto notare l'errore. Ho provveduto alla cancellazione di tutti i sentieri che avevo caricato in maniera errata. Provvederò a creare delle relazioni.
Grazie ancora
pitfire (2022-06-29 09:54:00+00:00): Hallo sectionz,
habs jetzt korrigiert. 
Brückenfläche und Brückentrassen benötigen Knotenverbindung. DE:Tag:man_made=bridge
"Brücken mit einer Ebene"
Verbinde alle Wege, die auf der Brücke verlaufen bridge=yes, mit einem node am Außenumriss.
sectionz (2022-06-29 11:59:49+00:00): Hallo pitfire,
für mich besteht dazu keine Not ;-) Mich stösst es aber nicht, wenn Du eine Knotenverbindung herstellst.
Schöne Grüsse
sectionz (2022-06-29 12:15:45+00:00): *stösst=stört
fkv (2022-09-14 22:18:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126199547 where the changeset comment is: revert 122992543
4004 (2022-06-30 16:00:37+00:00): чтобы обозначить например магазин, нужно задать ему теги магазина.
вы отметили, что здание торговое (building=retail), но это еще не магазин.
в левом меню при поиске шаблонов можно выбрать супермаркет (shop=supermarket_ или что другое (еще в правом меню есть обучалка)
John Kastner (2022-07-04 02:14:28+00:00): I notice there's another "Rosetree Court" just a bit west of this road which, according to your source should be "Layhill Valley Court" instead. I don't have local knowledge to day that this is definitely correct, but, if you're confident the source is correct, that road should be updated.
John Kastner (2022-07-04 02:14:37+00:00): east*
Dmithry (2022-07-08 14:20:53+00:00): Thanks for your comment, I added the street name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122992643
Eslam_Elsayed (2022-07-06 12:18:01+00:00): Hello medzar193;
I noticed you added some streets not exist in any satellite images.
I fixed these issues.
link for achavi:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123265848
Regards
Eslam_Elsayed
Eslam_Elsayed (2022-07-06 12:27:41+00:00): Hello olfadh;
I noticed you added unofficial tags that didn't match the Wiki OpenStreetMap.
I have fixed these issues and replaced them with suitable ones.
You can use Wiki OSM to add the tags suitably.
Link for Wiki OpenStreetMap.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features
Regards
Eslam_Elsayed
mueschel (2022-06-30 17:45:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Please be careful when editing. In this changeset you deleted a highway.
Benoît C MdP (2022-07-06 13:00:46+00:00): Bonjour Grola,

Pourquoi avoir supprimé le nom de la rue sur le chemin ? C'est indispensable pour les itinéraires de calcule d'itinéraire.

Merci

Benoît
Grola (2022-07-06 14:15:47+00:00): Bonjour,
le nom du chemin me paraissait faire doublon avec celui de la place. J'ignorais ce paramètre de calcul d'itinéraire.
Bien cordialement.
Eslam_Elsayed (2022-07-06 12:13:44+00:00): Hello marwa27;
I noticed you removed "highway" tag and added unofficial tags that didn't match the Wiki OpenStreetMap like "NOME", and "type".
Example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244653125/history
I have fixed these issues and replaced them with suitable tags to match the Wiki OpenStreetMap.
Regards
Eslam_Elsayed
user_2066394 (2022-06-29 22:09:25+00:00): Da gibt es eine Unterführung:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4592356

Du hast jetzt noch eine Brücke draufgelegt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074460452
user_2066394 (2022-07-09 19:42:52+00:00): korrigiert
mueschel (2022-06-30 17:44:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Please be careful when editing - with this changeset you deleted a highway.
Eslam_Elsayed (2022-07-03 10:16:26+00:00): Hello lotfimabrouk;
Please be careful when editing, You removed the "highway" tag, added the unknown key in the street, and changed some streets to an unsuitable classification.
Could you check it please and fix it?
Link for highway you removed the "highway".
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/705013779
Link for highway needs to revert the classification.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53382994
Regards
Eslam_Elsayed
alirezamousavipanah1 (2022-06-29 17:43:59+00:00): ساخته نمیشه
DaveF (2022-07-14 17:30:31+00:00): Hi
Please don't add the conflicting landuse tag to golf features. It's meant to be used as a stand-alone tag not a sub/adjective tag, Surface is the correct one to use.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass
bxl-forever (2022-06-29 10:06:10+00:00): Hello,

What kind of update did you apply to the bus routes?  Have the routes or stops changed in this area?

Or did you just click a "fix" button somewhere?
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:10:12+00:00): It was a automatic update suggested by iD
DeFra85 (2022-07-06 18:34:16+00:00): An der Ecke zur Stettiner Straße steht KEIN Straßennamenschild "Brenzlauer Straße". Rechts des Pollers ist Zuwegung Stettiner Straße 38 und links davon zu Bunzlauer Straße 9 und 11.
Den rechten Teil vielleicht unbenannt lassen?
flohoff (2022-07-07 12:30:09+00:00): 
Wenn man sich die Hausnummern ansieht würde ich sagen:

highway=service

Man könnte nochmal auf die Flurstück Nummern und aufteilungen im ALKIS gucken ob es da eine indikation gibt das das öffentlicher Grund ist. 

Auf der anderen seite. So steht denn das Zeichen 325 ? Das ist ja living_street. Steht das am Poller oder an der Stettiner Straße oder erst an der Ecke Bunzlauer Straße?

Zeichen 325 geht ja eigentlich nur auf Öffentlichen Straßen.

Und es ist jetzt auch nicht SOO ungewöhnlich das Hausnnummern von Straße A die Zufahrt über Straße B haben.

Flo
DeFra85 (2022-07-07 12:33:55+00:00): 325 steht direkt an der Zufahrt Stettiner Straße. Aber halt kein Straßennamenschild
flohoff (2022-07-07 12:37:43+00:00): 
Dann würde ich davon ausgehen das das einfach vergessen wurde.

Ich würde das so lassen.

Macht am ende auch keinen unterschied für die Navigation oder das Geocoding der Hausnummer 38. Wird gefunden - wird der Stettiner Straße zugeordnet (Wenn addr:street) und das Routing geht halt über die Bunzlauer Straße.

Flo
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-15 10:18:07+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184129728

https://osm.org/changeset/184129728
gscscnd (2022-07-02 06:33:48+00:00): Here the original restriction was added: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96239771
Badojo (2022-06-29 18:06:35+00:00): Nije bitno jeli je glavna nego državna. highway-primary označava isključivo one ceste koje su državne što potez od Predavca do centra nije. Ta cesta je nerazvrstana bivša županijska pa se označava kao secondary, po dogovoru (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Croatia/Ceste)
bjelsjole (2022-06-30 09:20:07+00:00): Uredu, to je razumljivo. Malo je cudno da glavna zila kucavica zapadnog Bjelovara nije klasificirana ali razumijem. Hvala na komentaru!
user_8101879 (2022-07-02 12:18:21+00:00): Hi,

the relation 12653749 and 12653750 are empty (no member) so useless : do you know how to fix this ?

The last version of JOSM will help you to prevent a new one, maybe you could update your software ?

Best regards
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-30 18:37:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123057038 where the changeset comment is: Reverting an allegedly fake cafe.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6114 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6000.
gszkr (2023-02-08 11:44:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074472673 - podjazd od ciągu pieszo-rowerowego? Poprawiłem. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1074237097 - chodnik równolegle do ciągu pieszo-rowerowego? Nijak się nie schodził z podkładem, poprawiłem już. 
To tak "na szybko" co mi się w oczy rzuciło poprawiając geometrie z podkładem.
VeryStrangePerson (2023-02-12 12:02:11+00:00): Dziękuję za poprawienie moich błędów! Robiłem to na początku mojej przygody z OSM i nie miałem zdjęć tylko jakieś małe dane z gps. Postaram się nie popełniać podobnych błędów w przyszłości!
mueschel (2022-06-30 10:28:01+00:00): Hi,
why did you change the correct 'currency' tags to incorrect 'payment' tags? Please be so kind and revert these changes.
jqngarcia (2022-06-30 11:25:39+00:00): Hi mueschel, where is correct use for currency and payment? Currency is for banks and payment for shops and other retailers?
mueschel (2022-06-30 11:38:56+00:00): Currency describes the currency used, e.g Dollar or Yen. Payment describes how you can pay, credit cards, cash, special apps. 

The tags are used in the way on any object, there is no difference between banks and shops.