piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Constable (2017-10-24 12:46:22+00:00): vale la stessa cosa anche per via leonardo da vinci e vig giusti, non dovevi crearne altre sovrapposte, dovevi (eventualmente) cambiare i tag di quelle già presenti.
Anche gli edifici, se sono residenziali puoi usare il tag building=residential e basta; inserire building=yes e building_1=residential non ha senso.
Se hai dubbi chiedi pure qua o/e consulta la wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page
Grazie, ciao
dgitto (2017-10-26 12:00:28+00:00): Inoltre: Via Filippo Corridoni, Via Leonardo da Vinci, ecc.
Nomi e cognomi con la maiuscola. (E Leonardo "da" minuscolo  Vinci)
Ciao
R0bst3r (2017-10-24 13:28:47+00:00): Hallo Heinrich5579,
du hast hier die Stimbergstraße 114 nach Westen verschoben. Ich denke, dass war unbeabsichtig. Habs korrigiert.
Viele Grüße
pitscheplatsch (2017-10-29 09:33:41+00:00): Hi togeak, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Noen (2017-11-16 20:35:33+00:00): Hei!
Det ser ut til at du har tegnet oppgjørselene oppe på gang og sykkelveien. Det blir feil måtte og gjøre ting på, fordi du får overlappende veier. Splitt eller opp gangveien, og gjør om på den når nødvendig.
km2bp (2017-11-17 14:41:20+00:00): Jeg korrigerte det bare  http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53202543
km2bp (2017-11-17 14:48:42+00:00): Og her er tilgangsveien til eiendommen på sykkelstien  https://goo.gl/maps/Aezaj4ZWuyA2
Hjart (2017-10-24 11:38:23+00:00): I have removed the 3 villages you upgraded, since they are not actually villages, but merely areas with a lot of summerhouses
j1scad (2017-10-24 14:09:42+00:00): Others are also tagged as villages or maybe as suburb (Hegnet, Bjerregard, Skodbjerge...) because its better visible on the map.
every bigger place on the map is not only a "hamlet"
Hjart (2017-10-24 14:12:36+00:00): Yeah, they probably should be looked at too. I'm not yet entirely sure about all of them though.
Hjart (2017-10-24 14:14:21+00:00): These 3 definitely shouldn't be classified as village though
Hjart (2017-10-24 16:11:08+00:00): Note that I researched official sources as well as had a look at Mapillary and what I found indicated that these are at most names of minor areas within the summerhouse areas here and were not even correctly placed
carciofo (2017-11-30 07:58:11+00:00): Hi, you've duplicated Gateway Blvd on this changeset so that there are two overlapping ways for the westbound segment. The turn restriction you added is also invalid: the sign is meant to represent that a U-turn is prohibited by crossing over the rail road tracks. Since there *was* no way in OSM through which a driver could make the turn, the restriction was implicitly mapped already (correctly, I may add, since there is technically no highway crossing the east- and west-bound segments of Gateway Blvd). Now you've added a way (which doesn't exist) in order to force the addition of the turn restriction, but you've neglected to add oneway=yes to it, so that a u-turn in the opposite direction (i.e. traveling westbound) can now be made. Kindly fix the duplicate/overlapping way an remove the cross-over segment over the rail road since it doesn't exist. Thanks in advance.
Teesta (2017-11-30 12:12:51+00:00): Thanks for bringing this into notice. I went ahead and fixed the duplicated ways and the incorrect turn restriction. About turn restriction it is helpful of what you have told regarding the issue will follow it from next time.
carciofo (2017-11-23 13:25:59+00:00): Hi, it looks like one of your teammates at Mapbox added this turning restriction at the same time, which resulted in the southbound A1A way being duplicated (i.e. two overlapping ways). Kindly coordinate and fix (crossref https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534829867). Thanks
ashleyannmathew (2017-11-27 04:37:06+00:00): We have fixed the issue. We observed that it happened because several members has been working on the same road and this caused the issue. We fixed most of the issues around the same time, but missed a few. Thanks for bringing it into notice.
vam_002 (2019-04-29 04:41:00+00:00): "Hi dennisramadhan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way 534824251
way 534824252
way 534824254
way 534829246
way 534829247
classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'. and way 534824258
way 534824259
way 534824264 seems like 'Tracks' 
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance."
dennisramadhan (2019-04-29 05:43:50+00:00): yeah, you are right, I've changed the tag of those ways
carciofo (2017-11-23 13:26:19+00:00): Hi, it looks like one of your teammates at Mapbox added this turning restriction at the same time, which resulted in the southbound A1A way being duplicated (i.e. two overlapping ways). Kindly coordinate and fix (crossref https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53203796). Thanks
Iqhra (2017-12-04 04:07:23+00:00): Hey, thanks for bringing this into notice. I went ahead and fixed the duplicated ways and the duplicate turn restriction.
corfede (2017-11-01 09:19:41+00:00): Ciao Marco, ti segnalo che le nuove foto Bing sono molto disallineate, quindi spostare le geometrie esistenti seguendo queste foto porta solo errori. In particoalre per la Puglia l'import dei fabbricati eseguito partendo dalla CTR è molto più preciso di qualunque altro supporto fotografico. Se vuoi fare degli aggiornamenti per nuove geometrie (esempio fabbricati di nuova costruzione) dovresti basarti su altre foto (le foto MapBox sembrano essere generalmente più allineate, altrimenti potresti usare la cartografia regionale). Ciao. Federico
carciofo (2017-11-30 11:31:18+00:00): Hi, you've duplicated Glades Road eastbound @ Airport Rd when you added a turn restriction. Please remove the duplicate and adjust your turn restriction accordingly. Thanks
ranjithjoy (2017-12-01 12:56:10+00:00): We have fixed the issue. We observed that it happened because several members has been working on the same road and this caused the issue. We fixed most of the issues around the same time, but missed a few. Thanks for bringing it into notice.
pitscheplatsch (2017-10-29 09:34:40+00:00): Hi KartoTest, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 
Furthermore, can you please revert your map changes?
See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53204556
eggie (2017-10-25 08:17:39+00:00): Wellicht nog even op op building=construction zetten. Het gebouw staat nog niet in de data van het kadaster. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=rozenpad,%20zwolle&resultOffset=0&objectId=0193100000072319&geometry.x=200107.49040307&geometry.y=504716.79558923&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=
Wellicht handig om het via het forum te laten importeren t.z.t.. 
Dat kan in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. Gebouwen worden namelijk niet zelf getekend.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Wellicht is het al mogelijk.
R0bst3r (2017-10-24 12:29:23+00:00): Hallo Mazorius,
willkommen bei OSM.
Sieht alles gut aus, danke für deinen Beitrag.
Viele Grüße
lakedistrict (2017-10-24 14:51:41+00:00): Welocme to OSM and thanks for your edits. It's good practice to tag the building with what it is used for (eg shop, pub, guest house etc). This is a bunk house for climbing groups etc to rent out isn't it? I've tagged similar buildings as tourism=alpine_hut, but you could use tourism=chalet (holiday cottage) or tourism=hostel if you think they are a better description.
SomeoneElse (2017-12-25 01:23:15+00:00): Hi, 
I'm guessing that "embarkment_type" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/534838009 should perhaps be  "embankment_type"?
Best Regards,
Andy
Paramida (2017-12-25 15:00:37+00:00): Hello,
Yes, thanks for pointing that out. Error has been corrected. Changed from "embarkment_type" to "embankment_type". Greetings
GinaroZ (2017-10-24 17:19:30+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating the map - I've removed the duplicate church.
mavl (2017-10-24 17:12:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap. Вы называете улицы в виде "ул. Цветочная". Замечу по этому поводу:  
1. В OpenStreetMap не используют сокращения и пишут названия полностью.  
2. В России у участников есть специальное соглашение по наименованию улиц. Если кратко, то называют "улица Пушкина", но "Пушкинская улица". Подробности в статье http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3  
  
Также эти жилые улицы имеют статус highway=unclassified. Но поскольку они жилые, то лучше использовать статус highway=residential  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
dlevchenko (2017-10-24 17:24:30+00:00): Спасибо за замечания. Только начал вливаться в  сообщество. 
Поправил
mavl (2017-10-24 17:30:48+00:00): Хорошо. Спасибо.
mavl (2017-10-24 17:31:39+00:00): P.S. улица Благодатная - неправильно. Правильно "Благодатная улица".
dlevchenko (2017-10-24 17:33:09+00:00): Да вот поправил и сижу еще раз вчитываюсь в wiki уже понял
mavl (2017-10-24 17:41:23+00:00): Хорошо. Вы, наверное, уже в курсе, но напишу, что если у вас будут вопросы, то можете задавать их на форуме [https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21]
dlevchenko (2017-10-24 17:43:35+00:00): Спасибо, буду иметь ввиду!
mavl (2017-10-24 17:51:00+00:00): P.S. Регистрация на форуме не нужна. Просто используется учётная запись OpenStreetMap.
R0bst3r (2017-10-24 12:21:05+00:00): Hallo FMRK,
willkommen bei OSM und vielen Dank für deine Ergänzung. Review war erfolgreich.
Viele Grüße
surveyor54 (2017-10-24 14:58:07+00:00): Hi, 
endet der Feldweg wirklich in der Wiese und der andere Weg auf dem Firmengelände?
Außerdem hast du durch deine Trennung die Routenrelation "Wartenrundweg Steinau a.d. Straße " unterbrochen.

Gruß
surveyor54
kloebi (2017-10-24 15:15:55+00:00): der Weg ist durch den Bau des Parkplatzes der Firma ODW-Elektrk unterbrochen. Von der Zufahtsstraße kommt man durch eine Drehtür ins Firmengelände und der weiterführende Weg ist durch ein dauerhaft verschlossenes Tor an der Stirnseite des Parkplatzes und Aufschüttung nicht mehr durchgängig.
m.f.G. kloebi
kloebi (2017-10-24 15:25:07+00:00): Ergänzung:
man kann den Parkplatz über einen schmalen Pfad im Feld südlich umgehen
kloebi
R0bst3r (2017-10-24 12:27:30+00:00): Hallo Vincent Eisfeld,
willkommen bei OSM.
Beim Review habe ich festgestellt, dass du Altendorf im name_1 Tag angegeben hast. Dieses Tag wird idR nicht ausgewertet, welche Alternativen es gibt, ist hier beschrieben: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name
Viele Grüße
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-24 21:51:45+00:00): How come it's a cycleway with no cycle access allowed??
Moovit Team (2017-11-21 14:32:02+00:00): What do you mean, which cycle-way?
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-21 16:09:50+00:00): Please note that ways affected by this changeset are listed just below this discussion. You can click them to see the latest version, or you can copy the way id to https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/ in order to see its history. As you can see (e.g. here: https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/415666260), you have added highway=cycleway, bicycle=no, which are contradicting tags, in October 24, and I reverted that in October 25.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-21 16:18:53+00:00): Also note most of my comments are a month old, many were fixed already...
surveyor54 (2017-10-24 14:41:34+00:00): Hallo,
nur für mein besseres Verständnis.
Warum hast du den alten Bereich farmyard nicht erweitert, sondern einen neuen Bereich dran gehängt und noch eine Relation dafür erstellt?

Gruß
surveyor54
kloebi (2017-10-24 15:03:44+00:00):  ich bitte um meinen Fehler zu berichtigen
m.f.G.
kloebi
surveyor54 (2017-10-24 15:27:41+00:00): Habs erledigt.
Bitte achte darauf, die Bing Luftbilder haben hier teilweise einen Versatz von 5 - 8m.
Das sollte man unbedingt berücksichtigen.
Gruß
surveyor54
user_6110846 (2018-01-04 12:32:11+00:00): в откат
The RedBurn (2018-01-04 11:42:13+00:00): It's an alley, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dalley
majid1359 (2017-10-24 11:32:41+00:00): تغییرات انجام شود
majid1359 (2017-10-24 11:35:07+00:00): لطفا آپدیت شود امروز نقشه های اسمند
majid1359 (2017-10-24 11:45:20+00:00): تغییرات انجام شد
BCNorwich (2017-10-24 12:55:47+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Your new POI for Roti King is already mapped. Thus I have removed this duplication and added your new info to the existing POI. 
Regards Bernard
Hjart (2017-10-24 14:05:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Winbladh har kørt den sti du har sat fixme på (jeg kan se et par af hans gps-spor på den), så han må kende den.
AsgerFrank (2017-10-24 19:19:42+00:00): Jeg spø'r lige ...
majid1359 (2017-10-24 11:53:39+00:00): آخرین تغییرات osm  اعمال شود سریعا
mueschel (2017-10-26 06:33:53+00:00): Hi,
you added many objects with the tag "building:condion". Could you have a look and correct the spelling? It should be "building:condition:

Thanks, Jan
Harald Hartmann (2017-11-04 11:05:07+00:00): And because elly_vick, Grace Lugoba and you have the same missspelling, do you use some JOSM Preset?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53236939
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53390039
EvanSiroky (2017-10-29 06:18:45+00:00): This changeset appears to have deleted a lot of relations.  Most notably, the relation 2551642: the state of Nayarit.
dougcb68 (2017-10-29 11:58:38+00:00): Thanks for the comment.  I will look at the issue when I get time--hopefully later today.  My procedure in the areas where the coastline co-locates with  and thena political boundary is to duplicate the political boundary and use the duplicate as the coastline.  In this process, I remove the relationships from the duplicate.  It is not unlikely that I screwed up and removed the relationships from the original, not the duplicate.  I will look into this ASAP.
freyfogle (2017-10-29 20:23:11+00:00): This edit also took out 5 different Mexican municipalities (admin_level 6). Please can we revert this change? It doesn't seem you accomplished what you intended.
dougcb68 (2017-10-29 22:30:44+00:00): Mea culpa.  I think I understand my error, and have spent a couple of hours studying how to rectify it.  My plan is to load all of the ways and nodes listed in the relationship history into JOSM, select them all, then using the relationship editor, re-apply all of the relationship tags listed in the history.  Given my obviously limited understanding of relationships, I think this should correct my mistake.  It might take me a couple of days to find the time to get this done but I will work on it as fast as possible.  Any comments?
mtmail (2017-10-30 10:10:44+00:00): Try the 'undelete' plugin for JOSM. It doesn't always work, e.g. when a way was meanwile edited  but sometimes it's the fastest to get back the old version.
freyfogle (2017-10-30 10:28:05+00:00): Please can you instead roll back this change ASAP so we get the state back and then you can fine tune things at your leisure. Losing a whole state for many days is bad
dougcb68 (2017-10-30 12:07:48+00:00): I believe that I have repaired the problem for Nayarit State using the procedure I described above.  Please let me know if I was successful or if there are still issues.  If this procedure worked as I expect, I will proceed to rectify the other relations ASAP. I apologize to all I have inconvenienced with my blunder and I promise to learn more about relations before I screww around with them again.
freyfogle (2017-10-30 22:20:00+00:00): Hi Doug,

don't worry, everyone makes mistakes, the key is learning from them and repairing any issues. I'm not sure your revert worked though, relation 
2551642 still is shown as deleted as are the municipalities. I hate to press, but I have projects that depend on this data and it's now been 6 days. Please can you just reverse the entire changeset and then at your leisure make the changes you need without deleting the state and the municipalities. 

thanks for your help
mtmail (2017-10-30 22:42:17+00:00): I see the rollback in changeset 53365582 from 11h ago. Thanks a lot.
freyfogle (2017-10-30 22:59:16+00:00): sorry, I should clarify, yes, it is great that the state is back, but we need the municipalities as well if possible. And the state now has a new osm id, which causes unnecessary pain for downstream data consumers. Only one of the five municipalities is back. In my opinion the best option would be to totally reverse this changeset (if that is still possible - probably not due to other changes in the meanwhile)
dougcb68 (2017-10-30 23:15:17+00:00): Freyfogle-I´m afraid that I don know how to reverse a changeset.  The procedure that I used was the best I could devise.  Perhaps you could direct me to some reference material on how to reverse a changeset. Otherwise, I was planning on working on rolling back the changes to the municipalities right now, using the procedure I used with the Nayarit state relationships.

Also, I tried to contact you directly by replying to the email you sent.  That was returned as undeliverable.  When I tried to message you through your user page I got a server error 500 message.  Maybe we can set up a more direct link if you email me using my OSM user name at hotmail.com.  Meanwhile, I will be researching other means of rolling back changesets.
dougcb68 (2017-10-30 23:46:16+00:00): I tried the JOSM reverter plugin but it just produced a string of nodes along the coastline.  It did nothing to restore the relations.
dougcb68 (2017-10-31 01:41:28+00:00): I have now restored all 6 of the deleted relations using the procedure outlined above.  I am open to any other suggestions for repairing the damage I have caused.  I can think of nothing else to do, so I will return to my mangrove mapping.
user_6110846 (2018-01-04 11:56:18+00:00): замена в name украинского на русский категорически неприемлема для 80 процентов обьектов Такие правки  идут в откат автоматичски при вьіявлении
carciofo (2017-11-30 11:41:43+00:00): Hi, you seem to have duplicated Glades Rd westbound @ Airport Road when adding a turn restriction (which you seem to have done twice). Kindly remove the duplicate roads and adjust the turning restrictions accordingly. Thanks.
ranjithjoy (2017-12-01 12:56:20+00:00): We have fixed the issue. We observed that it happened because several members has been working on the same road and this caused the issue. We fixed most of the issues around the same time, but missed a few. Thanks for bringing it into notice.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:43:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
SimonPoole (2017-10-27 14:31:45+00:00): Hallo intruder53 und willkommen bei OSM.

Danke für dein Beitrag, bitte aber keine persönlichen Namen ins "name" Attribut schreiben, sondern es bei der Gebäudeadresse belassen (von wegen Datenschutz etc). 

Ein andere Punkt du hast auch noch die Büros der swiss-host erfasst, dafür gibt es eigene "Objekte" und die Information sollte nicht direkt ans Gebäude.

Beides jetzt korrigiert.

Gruss
AsgerFrank (2017-10-27 12:08:04+00:00): Please disregard request for review.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:52:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:14:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-25 12:07:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53233977 where the changeset comment is: reverted known vandal changeset(s)
mavl (2018-12-25 21:52:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
majid1359 (2017-10-24 13:28:58+00:00): آخرین تغییرات انجام شود
mavl (2018-12-25 21:40:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
PT-53 (2017-10-25 10:55:32+00:00): Hallo bürsti,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz u.a.diese Schranke eingetragen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4542233313
Bei einer Schranke muß auch die entspr. access-Regel angegeben werden (Siehe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dlift_gate). Das gleiche gilt für die Straßen nach der Schranke, Sonst werten QS-Tools (z.B. OSM-Inspectors) das als Routingfehler.
Holst Du das noch nach ?
Grüße
bürsti (2017-10-25 11:23:57+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe motorhome hinzugefügt. Die Schranke geht nur mit einem Schlüssel zu öffnen, welcher an der Badkasse gegen 30€ Pfand erhältlich ist.
PT-53 (2017-10-26 08:49:27+00:00): Hallo bürsti,
Schlüsselwerte werden i.d.R.klein geschrieben. Ich habe deshalb Deine Eingabe Motorhome auf motorhome geändert. Außerdem hae ich den unnötigen Eintrag access=no gelöscht,
Du hast - wohl versehentlich - eine neue Schranke eingetragen, statt die bereits vorhandene Schranke zu berichtigen. Ich habe das korrigiert.
Fehler passieren jedemmal.
Grüße
JamesKingdom (2017-10-24 14:31:38+00:00): We can still leave the construction though?
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-25 12:07:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53233977 where the changeset comment is: reverted known vandal changeset(s)
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-25 12:07:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53233977 where the changeset comment is: reverted known vandal changeset(s)
Supaplex (2018-01-20 13:50:07+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
KarmaCleaner (2017-10-25 12:07:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53233977 where the changeset comment is: reverted known vandal changeset(s)
Rainero (2017-10-26 19:04:46+00:00): Hallo Jürgen,

willkommen bei OSM!
Parkstreifen entlang von Straßen werden anders eingetragen als flächenförmige Parkplätze, nicht mit amenity=parking, sondern mit parking:lane=left|right|both .
Schau dir mal http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane an. 
Ein Postadresse gehört auch nicht an einen Parkplatz oder Parkstreifen.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Juergen Kaetzler (2017-10-27 08:49:12+00:00): Hallo Rainer!
Danke für die Infos - gut zu wissen und werd ich bei den nächsten Änderungen berücksichtigen!
Viele Grüße und schönes Wochenende,
Jürgen
manings (2017-11-06 06:38:47+00:00): You added a turn restriction on a cycle route.  Curious if this is valid: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7677436/history

Keep on mapping.