piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Geonick (2022-04-07 15:41:10+00:00): Vielen Dank. Da habe ich bzw. der iD-Editor kompletter Mist gebaut. Das muss reverted werden. Und ich versuche nachzuvollziehen, wie mir das passieren konnte. Eigentlich wollte ich nur OH "Mo-Fr 07:00-20:00; Sa 07:00-18:00; Su off" und post_office=post_partner  eintragen. Dann zeigt der iD-Editor Way-Warnings...
Geonick (2022-04-07 18:21:50+00:00): Ist nun reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117104652
Piz Pachific (2022-04-08 08:57:58+00:00): Passiert den Besten ;-)
Salaml (2022-11-15 15:51:06+00:00): Wo hast du die Adresse denn her? Das ist eine Garage und da steht nirgendwo eine Hausnummer oder so etwas dran. Ich würde die Adresse daher wieder entfernen.
Brandweger (2022-11-16 08:15:15+00:00): Dann hab ich die wohl bei Google geklaut? Stand ja vor 3 Jahren auch schon so drin. Ich hatte etliche fehlende Nummern nachgetragen, weil es mich geärgert hatte, manche Adresse nicht zu finden.
Danke für's Aufpassen.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-07 00:16:41+00:00): Removed and fixed SEO spam tags for POI in changeset 183759913

https://osm.org/changeset/183759913
habi (2022-04-07 19:41:15+00:00): Ciao holitianasarindra

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Since `review_requested`, here's my feedback on your first changeset.

Some of the nodes you've added in this changeset are in the middle of the ocean, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9649158112 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9649158113.
This makes your changeset area really large, potentially notifying a *lot* of people which are watching their neighbourhood (like I do in Switzerland) and making a review of your changes cumbersome.
Please try to confine your changes to a small geographic area.

The building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049974860/ is mapped *over* an already present building, which doesn't make sense, also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049974861/ and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049974862/
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049974856/ overlaps the landuse region, which (I think) should have given you a warning in JOSM.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1049974884 is drawn *over* the street, which is wrong, too.

We're all happy for you to contribute, but please take care of avoiding such easy errors, which (I guess) you've also been warned by JOSM to not make.

I'm happy to answer questions if you have any, just let me know, here in a comment or in a direct message via the OSM system.
RaccoonFederation (2022-04-07 14:56:14+00:00): Hi BinkyBunny,
What source are you using? How do you know it's an ANPR camera?
Binky Bunny (2022-04-07 16:59:04+00:00): The source is a KML file that was produced some years ago by the organisation BigBrother watch. I'm just verifying each one and adding it here along with the hundreds I have found myself as BigBrother watch haven't added my data to their data set I thought it made sense to check their data and add it here where it's still found to be reasonably up to date
raito (2022-04-08 13:31:41+00:00): Hi kita. I have to point out you removed the house numbers I gathered. Also your redraw made the houses less accurate. Bruneians like to add size to their houses.
zulfadli51 (2022-04-08 13:52:16+00:00): Hi, thanks for your feedback. As for house numbers, I don't think it's a good idea to be added as it may infringe personal privacy, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information, unless it's a public apartment like Singapore's HDB flats. As for my drawings, anyone are welcome to redraw the relevant houses. My intention is to expedite the drawings of houses especially for perumahan as they originally have standardised layouts.
raito (2022-04-08 14:23:45+00:00): I can't find where it says do not add house numbers. House numbers are not private for people to keep secret. People like postman, delivery riders, normal relatives will find house numbers on maps useful. House numbers are available on other commercial maps like Herewego by Nokia.
raito (2022-04-08 14:24:53+00:00): In UK for example, openstreetmap house numbers appears very complete
zulfadli51 (2022-04-08 14:36:38+00:00): I think for other countries like the UK seems like house numbers info are provided by the authority to OSM, not individual mappers. My stance is that as a private mapper I'd refrain from adding the house numbers myself. I don't think it's relevant to compare with other map products as each have different terms of usage, thus here only OSM policy rules. Also, my stance is that house numbers are private info. Postal services know because they have the authority, other people know only because each individual consent to giving such info.

"OpenStreetMap is not a property registry, thus do not map individual ownership of buildings or plots."
SomeoneElse (2022-04-11 19:08:16+00:00): Following on from https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/119209542 , "highway=path" isn't appropriate for the constituent parts of a canoe trail, either.
Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14014674 as a relation is OK.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5940597 for how this is done elsewhere.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-05-02 21:57:07+00:00): Hello,
Following a DWG complaint I had to revert a couple of changesets that affected some objects you've edited later here.  My changeset is https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120479705 ; see e.g. https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/163701618 for what changed in each case.  
Do any of your edits need re-applying?
What source were you using?
Best Regards,
Andy
Edman92 (2022-05-31 15:29:48+00:00): Hello! Sorry for the long answer.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names
Under the link above from OpenStreetMaps Wiki,
tag: ''name'' contains the common, default name in the local language.
In accordance with these rules, I changed the names of the streets to the local language.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119433499
SomeoneElse (2022-05-31 18:44:16+00:00): Thanks
Sylvain M (2024-05-12 20:05:33+00:00): Dommage d'ajouter un commerce (ici coiffeur) qui est déjà présent dans OSM, créant un doublon...
Je supprime le doublon et met à jour le commerce initial
Sylvain M (2024-05-12 20:09:50+00:00): Commerce mis à jour :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3274106005
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2024-05-13 07:17:41+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre alerte

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
aceman444 (2022-04-10 11:30:38+00:00): Co je zle na building=civic? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71658503

Ostatne zmeny akotak dobre, dakujem. Tieto dediny su dost zanedbane a nesedia ani na kataster ani na Ortofoto.
literan (2022-04-07 18:39:42+00:00): а что это за "Золотой трейл", что за название (и название чего?)
user_2066394 (2022-04-07 20:12:25+00:00): Die Nummer 52 ist bereits auf dem Gesamtareal eingetragen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106485505
Neo28504 (2022-04-07 20:36:55+00:00): Das von mir markierte Gebäude hat die Bezeichnung B6. Andere Gebäude sind entsprechend mit z.B B8, B5 etc markiert....B6 fehlt. Weiß nicht genau wie man das bei dem Gebäude hinzufügt... :)
Neo28504 (2022-04-07 20:41:34+00:00): Ich vergaß.... Vergleiche Gebäudebezeichnungen hier:

https://www.die-grillfabrik.de/_files/ugd/cbe227_12e6ede0e18a42eab4632d241fb06bcb.pdf
user_2066394 (2022-04-07 20:45:40+00:00): Du hast in dem Sinn die Nr. 52 auf die Gebäude gelegt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/87285263
Neo28504 (2022-04-07 20:52:05+00:00): Oh....das ist natürlich Blödsinn. So war das nicht gedacht. Das gern entfernen. Hm, evtl. geht das dann mit der Organic Maps Apps nicht ganz so wie gedacht. :( Entschuldigung.
user_2066394 (2022-04-07 20:57:40+00:00): Kein Thema :-) Wenn die Hausnummer auf dem Gesamtareal und auf den einzelnen g
Gebäuden liegt, ergeben sich Duplikate.

https://osm-suspects.gbconsite.de/#17/48.36435/10.91949/osm-wrongcity-minimalmissing-wrongstreet-wronghousenumber-outsideplz-falsepositive-dupes-errorbinoverlay
rekire (2022-04-09 12:32:00+00:00): Kann ich bestätigen, mir wurde aber gesagt das man abgerissene Gebäude als demolished:building=yes markieren soll, damit der nächste das Gebäude nach dem Luft-Fotos nicht wieder einzeichnet.
Vinber-Pro (2022-04-17 08:52:22+00:00): salut,
là tu as nommé des batiments, mais tu n'as pas qualifié que c'est des locations.

Les 2 semblent similaires, il est préférable de faire une surface englobant les 2 dans ce cas pour n'avoir qu'à écrire le nom une fois ... ainsi que les éventuelles coordonnées.

à plus
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119434706
Frans S (2022-04-08 10:52:08+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key.
 Another point. Lots of residential areas were mapped in the past . please adjust them when the build area is enlarged and don't let them cross the buildings. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119434711
Frans S (2022-04-08 10:48:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions)
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.
F: buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119434755
datendelphin (2022-04-17 11:30:09+00:00): Ein Tor sollten nicht auf einer Kreuzung, sondern danach platziert werden. Damit klar wird, für welchen Weg es gilt
Retired Account (2022-04-08 12:07:35+00:00): This change incorrectly removes the carpark building just for "fixing osmose" error.
marczoutendijk (2022-04-08 14:34:24+00:00): Hi JalooooNz,
That carpark seems to be below the other building and the swimming pool.
Hence it should have layer=-1.
The adjacent Tropez Residences seem to have the same problem.
Apart from that the landuse with the name was duplicated.
I tried some fixes. Please follow with me and check this also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
Thanks!
ottwiz (2022-04-18 20:41:10+00:00): Is the entirety of River Road a bridge? from imagery it doesn't look if it was one. (I'm mapping landcover there and I just noticed this)
Old_Forester (2022-04-25 12:25:14+00:00): ottwiz - my mistake. It should be fixed now. 

I'm curious about your efforts to map landcover in the area. Can you elaborate?
ottwiz (2022-04-25 18:23:04+00:00): Well, I decided to map Vermont because I saw that there is some very wooded area in the Northeast Kingdom and I was like "why not, I'm good at mapping woods and I know that Vermont should be green by means of wood landcover". And I know that there are few mappers from Vermont who also map woods now and then.

My main project right now is to have West Virginia's forest landcover complete hopefully in one or two years.(For WV, I also know a few friends who either live or have some of their relatives there)
ottwiz (2022-04-25 18:25:21+00:00): To be honest, I like to map those counties which have mostly woods(80+%) and not those which have a lot of farming land or cutlines because that makes the process slower for manual tracing.
Greg_Rose (2022-10-05 07:42:57+00:00): Heya! Just a note: Don't use highway=track for through roads. Tracks are generally not routable, so if it's a primitive road that nonetheless can be used as a through route (and not a dead end) use an 'unclassified' tag. You might already know that, since this change is from 6 months ago, and if so - please ignore! Happy mapping!
lyctkel (2023-12-02 21:19:59+00:00): Hi heiglandreas,
at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9649361613 you wrote
recycling:glass=true
I guess you meant
recycling:glass=yes.
By the way, is this container really for all kinds of glasses like glass for windows etc.
That's unusual for a container on the street side.
Regards,
lyctkel
datendelphin (2022-04-17 11:24:58+00:00): mehrere Hausnummern: besser direkt am Eingang mappen, oder Haus unterteilen
mueschel (2022-04-15 09:41:36+00:00): Hi,
you added the strange key 'unref' here - could you check that?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11151730
SethY861 (2022-04-19 20:21:49+00:00): My bad that "unref" was meant to be "unsigned_ref" because Antioch Road and Adams Parkway were listed as "ref" County Road 4 although there is no supporting signage. I'll correct that tag now.
Rainero (2022-04-10 21:32:58+00:00): Hallo joe2812,  
könntest du das Gebäude nochmal anschauen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319935035 ? Da sind auch einige Punkte ohne Eigenschaften. Irgendwas ist da schiefgegangen.

Viele Grüße,  
Rainer
GUFSZ (2023-04-14 05:44:14+00:00): Gab es eine Reaktion auf diesen CS Kommentar auf anderem Wege. Auch in Form einer Korrektur?
Rainero (2023-04-14 09:59:19+00:00): Es gab leider keine Reaktion auf meinen CS-Kommentar, aber das Gebäude wurde von einem anderen User entfernt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120983058
Ob da noch diese Punkte ohne Eigenschaften existieren, muss ich abends am PC mal schauen. Ich hatte  es aus den Augen verloren.
Rainero (2023-04-14 19:36:31+00:00): Diese Punkte wurden mit o.g. CS entfernt. Also ist nun alles okay.
ivanbranco (2022-04-07 16:27:13+00:00): Ciao Martino, non capisco perché mappi le panchine sia come way che come nodo.
ivanbranco (2022-04-07 16:38:49+00:00): Inoltre secondo me per le aree che hai mappato come landuse=flowerbed sarebbe meglio utilizzare man_made=planter.
user_10901495 (2022-04-07 17:44:43+00:00): Sulla seconda cosa sono d'accordo, in effetti flowerbed non mi sembrava adatto, ma non conoscevo (prima di ora) alternative. 
Ho inserito le panchine anche come nodo per lo stesso principio per cui si fa la stessa cosa sugli attraversamenti pedonali e sui cancelli (cioè che l'estensione fisica e l'oggetto in sè sono due cose diverse) e perché vengano mostrate sulla mappa principale, cosa che come puoi vedere con le panchine solo come linee non avviene.
ivanbranco (2022-04-07 18:07:12+00:00): Martino, ma fidate na volta :p

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:One_feature,_one_OSM_element

come hai fatto tu è come se ci fossero due panchine, è non è la verità. Le strisce pedonali sono una casistica a parte, ma nemmeno in quel caso sono lo stesso elemento OSM, la way è un highway=footway/cycleway mentre il nodo un highway=crossing. Qua entrambi gli elementi sono amenity=bench.

"perché vengano mostrate sulla mappa principale": non si mappa per il rendering (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tagging_for_the_renderer)
hackthemap (2022-04-07 17:22:06+00:00): Thanks for the addition! Small note : I think it should be EUR with capital letters instead of Eur at least according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:charge
joel1972 (2022-04-07 21:12:02+00:00): Thanks for your Information. I have changed it to
5.00 EUR/day
Kovoschiz (2022-04-08 07:00:39+00:00): Please only use `natural=peak` when it is higher than the entire surrounding. `place=locality` otherwise.
literan (2022-04-07 18:38:56+00:00): access=no и прочие теги юридического доступа лишние (подробнее см. у меня в профиле)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:10:24+00:00): revertido
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:11:50+00:00): No use el mapa para marcas personales, solo información de relevancia pública.
Alfredo Alexander Jumbo Romero (2022-07-28 03:15:12+00:00): Como vuelvo y le repito por si no le queda claro.
"OpenStreetMap es datos abiertos: puede usarlo libremente para cualquier propósito siempre que dé crédito a OpenStreetMap y a sus colaboradores". 
Deje de eliminarme las marcas arbitrariamente.
rainerU (2022-05-16 13:52:49+00:00): Hallo Karthoo,

du hast in diesem CS an einem guten Dutzend von Wegen das lcn=yes entfernt, welches ich gesetzt hatte. Da du im selben CS auch das tagging der zugehörigen Wegweiser ergänzt hast, gehe ich davon aus, dass dir bekannt ist, dass diese Wege zum Radverkehrsnetz des Alb-Donau-Kreises gehören. 

u.a betroffene Wege:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29334218
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124993531

Ich könnte akzeptieren, dass du das lcn=yes am Weg entfernst, wenn du entsprechende lcn-Relationen für die Verbindungen anlegen würdest, wie du das anderswo machst. So aber ist eine zutreffende und für die Kartendarstellung und das Routing wichtige Information verloren gegangen. 

Ich werde das lcn=yes wieder setzen und bitte dich, in Zukunft derartige Änderungen zu unterlassen. Solltest du damit nicht einverstanden sein, können wir gerne im Forum darüber diskutieren.

Grüße
RainerU
Mammi71 (2022-08-12 21:31:48+00:00): Hallo robsteinde, warum hast Du das proposed=rail an der Darssbahn entfernt?
robsteinde (2022-08-15 12:10:02+00:00): Hi Mammi71,

ich habe proposed=rail für den Abschnitt Meiningenbrücke bis Prerow aus 2 Gründen entfernt:
1. Es ist in der Communitiy Konsens, dass erst ab einem Planfeststellungsbeschluss (PFB) oder einem vergleichbaren Planungsschritt, der Baurecht schafft, Objekte als proposed in openstreetmap aufgenommen werden. Der PFB liegt nur bis Bresewitz vor. DIesen Abschnitt habe ich auch proposed belassen.
2. Es wurde der historische Streckenverlauf mit proposed getaggt. Das ist mit SIcherheit falsch, weil in dem Planungsverfahren kein Streckenverlauf mehr enthalten ist, der dem historischen Verlauf auf Zingster Ortsgebiet folgt.

Grund 1. ist aber der entscheidende.

LG
Rob
Jakka (2022-04-08 07:16:19+00:00): Deze naamgeving wordt verwijderd. Vermoed dat dit ook geen winkel is.
Graag meer info ove dit gebouw
Supaplex (2022-04-09 09:00:20+00:00): 你刪太快了，把文山景美運動關係破壞掉了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119437074
WWSS (2022-04-09 12:04:17+00:00): 呃... 看起來沒關係啊？
markkerrigan (2022-06-10 19:50:16+00:00): this is not really a park as it was previously tagged as leisure=nature_reserve. Although it does have some trails, the primary purpose of this protected area is as a conservation area. We have a Slack channel to help clarify if you are unsure about tagging.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-30 06:36:15+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9649500792/history has shop = outlet that was added in this edit
shop=outlet ? Is it outlet for home electronics like fridges? For clothes? For cars? For something else?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-30 06:36:38+00:00): (is this shop even existing? website is not loading for me)
alpha_ace (2025-09-02 12:02:16+00:00): Hi, the store has been permanently closed in the meantime
alpha_ace (2025-09-02 12:05:59+00:00): Removed, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/171357895
SekeRob (2022-04-07 17:04:59+00:00): OK, this has resolved the issue of no-render in standard carto mapping.
Frans S (2022-04-08 10:31:14+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119437800
Frans S (2022-04-08 10:45:09+00:00): Hello. A small remark additional to my previous comment. All rectangular buildings needs to be squared with the Q key,  You missed some.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119437800
gscholz (2022-12-29 09:12:32+00:00): Hi lamder,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-77.36390&lat=-9.16395&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130123315

As you may know unconnected ways cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?

I am wondering about what source you used to add those ways as they are not visible on satellite images. Can you please explain?

Kind regards
Guido
pitfire (2022-05-10 06:05:59+00:00): Hallo wombatmaper,
der "Weg: 698999519" ist bestimmt nur " tunnel=building_passage" und keine Höhle mit "layer=-1"
wombatmaper (2022-05-14 22:56:45+00:00): danke pitfire, ich hab dies nun korrigiert.
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-01 22:13:10+00:00): Do not incorrectly use cartpaths to outline a parking lot.  Do not map for the renderer.  These edits have been removed.
VLD191 (2023-04-05 16:27:44+00:00): Hello, I apologize for the misedit. Thank you for making the appropriate fixes.
SomeoneElse (2023-07-01 13:01:58+00:00): Should the wheelchair tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9649547673 perhaps be a source tag?
phodgkin (2023-07-10 08:36:33+00:00): Indeed it should. Fixed.
SekeRob (2022-04-09 11:14:48+00:00): rm? lande?, you're mapping in Italy, so please add proper comprehensible comments in English or Italian.

Whilst the park you mapped is brokewn with a self intersection at Via dell asparago. How we know? The area does not render in standard Carto view. I've fixed it for you

ciao.
ivanbranco (2022-04-08 16:46:32+00:00): Ciao Edarof, benvenuto su OSM! :)

Solo un appunto: su OSM i nomi delle vie vanno in maiuscolo, es. "Via Guglielmo Marconi" invece di "via Guglielmo Marconi". Invece i nomi con date vanno in lettere, es. "Via Venti Settembre" invece di "Via XX Settembre". Ho corretto io questa volta, buon mapping :)
Glassman (2022-04-09 17:47:39+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119438589
burrscurr (2025-07-30 19:37:50+00:00): Hallo WWW_Ltbg,

ich bin über https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050029268 gestolpert – ich glaube, du willst ausdrücken, dass die Altstadt denkmalgeschützt ist, oder? historic=memorial ist eigentlich für Denkmäler, Statuen, Mahnmale und so weiter gedacht. Für Denkmalschutz gibt es heritage=* (welche "Ebene" des Denkmalschutzes, z.B. heritage=4 für Bundesland), heritage:operator= (Abkürzung der Behörde, z.B. heritage:operator=tlda fürs Thüringer Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie) und heritage:ref (falls es eine Nummer für das Denkmal gibt). Die Details findest du auch hier im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:heritage?uselang=de. 

VG
burrscurr
Glassman (2022-04-09 17:49:52+00:00): #TIP: We don't add addresses to streets or sidewalks. Can you move it to the middle of the building?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119438613
Syl (2022-04-07 21:09:08+00:00): Bonjour, vous avez mis que le château d'eau a 8 niveaux, ce sont des mètres ?
literan (2022-04-07 18:36:32+00:00): по жопке сейчас получишь