piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-06-12 20:35:28+00:00): na verdade nao existe mais a passagem, era melhor excluir
Zian Choy (2020-02-28 07:48:16+00:00): I think you misspelled the word "specialty" in the tag name according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Specialties.
user_5359 (2020-02-28 14:55:14+00:00): Thank you for pointing that out, I hadn't actually noticed. But unfortunately the wiki has the error here.
Specialty is the word used in American English (the OED reports it's chiefly Northern American), while speciality is used in British English. In medicine (as for what reported by the OED) both specialty and speciality are used.
source: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/25753/is-there-a-difference-between-speciality-and-specialty
I will add a comment to the wiki!
user_5359 (2020-02-28 14:57:44+00:00): See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare. There is the British speciality used.
AkuAnakTimur (2020-02-15 11:46:20+00:00): Sila check semula edit way ini, angle-nya sangat off, bisa tidak boleh navigasi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317618782
Riyadi IRM-RV (2020-02-17 07:47:29+00:00): already fixed it. it's probably drag off for previous editing. terimakasih
TheSwavu (2020-09-25 23:28:40+00:00): Hi,

I don't think Flinders Council LGA should extended across the Victorian Border.
RoundCircle (2020-09-26 00:10:08+00:00): https://www.theage.com.au/national/states-divided-between-diemen-and-deep-blue-sea-20050120-gdzefu.html

I believe these islets are disputed territory, hence the overlap.
TheSwavu (2020-09-26 06:28:17+00:00): Did you read that article? It says that "neither state government seems to mind sharing custody". That's not really disputed. 

There's a great article linked off the Wikipedia article that explains the history: https://web.archive.org/web/20160816075748/http://www.surveying.org.au/docs/traverse/TRAV294.pdf
RoundCircle (2020-09-26 06:37:56+00:00): Disputed was the wrong word on my part then. However, the source PSMA data for the LGAs includes these areas as part of Flinders. Hence why they overlap across the Vic border.
TheSwavu (2020-09-26 06:43:28+00:00): The PSMA boundaries have lots of "leakage" across state borders.
mavl (2020-02-02 11:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80431948 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3428].
mavl (2020-02-02 11:19:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80431948 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3428].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-15 11:51:30+00:00): Hello,
Just to let you know, 
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=681872209 has been "source=Google Maps" since version 3.  I suspect that that tag actually got there as a merge with another Google-sourced way.  If you're happy that there's basically nothing left of the original Google Maps data I'd suggest removing that tag from it and any other similar roads that you might encounter further east (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/QJu is a list).  If you're not, leave it and we'll delete it later.
I've just done a revert of a number of changesets that included Google-sourced data starting at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80608729 , but where other mappers have edited the data since (like this road) I haven't yet done anything.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
atomwaffen (2020-01-20 00:17:07+00:00): Have you imported Microsoft building footprints? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762169639 is clearly from there.

→ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Microsoft_Building_Footprint_Data
AndrewSnow (2020-01-20 05:49:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM - you seem like a fairly new contributor. None of my 2.2M+ changes have been performed using imports, a term which has a specific meaning in OSM.  Instead, in the last few months when I edit in Maproulette, I switch from JOSM to Facebook's new RapidID editor (see link in changeset above).  There's a number of useful things you can do in that editor not currently possible in JOSM, including manually selecting MS bldg outlines one at a time as part of the of editing session.  Not all the the MS detections are useful - I talk about this in the OSM Slack session dedicated to AI assisted editing, but much of what's there is useful, some of it with rotation required.  In some cases, extensive follow up in JOSM is required for precision, which I usually reserve for large civic buildings like schools, universities and hospitals.  That said, you should check it out.
SomeoneElse (2020-01-11 11:05:49+00:00): Hello,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7121590485 doesn't look like a "tourist attraction" to me.  
You may not be aware, but when you edit OpenStreetMap you're editing a map that everyone can see, not just your personal copy. Please do continue editing, but please do only add things that are verifiable on the ground. If you want to add a personal bookmark to MAPS.ME you can - just select the thing that you want to bookmark and select "menu" and then "bookmark". 
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-01-11 11:12:30+00:00): こんにちは、

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7121590485は、私にとって「観光名所」のようには見えません。
気づかないかもしれませんが、OpenStreetMapを編集するときは、個人のコピーだけでなく、誰もが見ることができるマップを編集していることになります。 編集を続けてください。ただし、検証可能なもののみを追加してください。 MAPS.MEに個人のブックマークを追加したい場合は、ブックマークしたいものを選択し、「メニュー」、「ブックマーク」の順に選択します。
宜しくお願いします、
アンディ
user_5359 (2022-04-08 06:00:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762174838/history. What is the meaning of the tag key = Assegaaibos?
shavankrats (2022-04-08 07:19:32+00:00): Not sure. Possibly invalid or should just be the name.
ika-chan! (2020-08-14 16:05:32+00:00): Hello, you have seemed to add a lot of rings with the tag "man_made=pipeline". I wonder what are you trying to represent? Maybe I can find a better tag for that.
jimkats (2020-09-20 23:54:14+00:00): He did that here aswell? Darn, it seems it may be trolling, because same thing was added in Argos, while no visual evidence exist.
mueschel (2020-01-12 09:42:36+00:00): On at least 10 ways you changed the attributes maxspeed:forward and maxspeed:backward to maxspeed and maxspeed:1.

There are also two bicycle routes that seem to be broken - both directions run along the northbound oneway street.

Please fix this!
shadty (2020-01-13 06:30:03+00:00): Hi,
As part of my edit, I had to split the segment to dual carriageway during which I had to remove the forward and backward tags. As the neighboring segment had only one cycle path, I had continued to add it. However if you suggest I shall add it on both ends.

Please advice!

Looking forward to learning more from you.

Thanks,
mueschel (2020-01-13 09:01:59+00:00): The maxspeed tags are now definitely wrong, please add only the correct one to each way.

About the cycle path - check the situation on ground. Currently there is no cycleway tagged and the route makes cyclists use a oneway street in the wrong direction.
sskalyan (2020-01-17 14:47:31+00:00): Hi,

I have fixed cycle routes by assigning north and south bound routes. But, we are not clear of maxspeed tags since we are remote mappers we didn't tampered existing tags. We  just followed tagging methodology of adjoining segment  (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399543200#map=18/33.72625/-118.08047). Please refer to this link. If you are aware of local speed limits, kindly let us we will add them accordingly.

Thanks in advance,
Kalyan
mueschel (2020-01-17 14:59:14+00:00): The speed limits where all properly tagged before your edit. Just check the history of all the ways.
mueschel (2020-02-01 16:03:39+00:00): Can we still expect you to fix this issue?
sskalyan (2020-02-03 06:23:46+00:00): Hi,

I have modified maxspeed tags uniformly according to connecting segments. changeset:80457805. Please let us know if you have any other issues.

Regards,
Kalyan
mueschel (2020-02-03 18:19:25+00:00): That's still not correct.
E.g. this way
http://osm.org/way/399677993 
had a 'maxspeed:backward=55', but your new way running in opposite direction has 'maxspeed=45'.
sskalyan (2020-02-04 07:05:25+00:00): Hi,

The segment you have mentioned is a child segment created by our editor while creating dual carriageway. Parent segment for the mentioned segment is way: 399677993
https://snipboard.io/HKJugc.jpg (please refer to the URL for deep history screenshot) which is then a bidirectional road has three maxspeed related tags. 
maxspeed, maxspeed:forward and maxspeed:backward, these tags are contradicting in nature, so we have removed forward and backward values since we have made segment into dual carriageway. Maxspeed values are fluctuating and not clear along this stretch of  Pacific Coast Highway, to solve this I propose adding OSM note so that local mapper with sufficient knowledge in local speed limits can verify and do modifications accordingly. As per the information I have provided it is clear, that we did not add multiple speed limits.

Honestly,
Kalyan
mueschel (2020-02-04 09:17:51+00:00): You deleted valuable information. There are plenty of sources (e.g. Mapillary) to check that the formerly tagged maxspeed:forward and maxspeed:backward were indeed correct. 
The 'maxspeed' tag was there, but simply overridden by the two more specific tags. 

Please stop destroying data and invest in some proper training about OSM!
sskalyan (2020-02-04 10:59:53+00:00): Hi Mueschel,
I didn't understand your point on how to add maxspeed:forward and maxspeed:backward for a uni-directional road. Please help me in understanding that information. As per your inputs,  I have gone through the mappilary imagery of entire road stretch and identified the right maxspeed tags and updated them in OSM (80528644). Let me know if any further changes are required. 
Regards,
Kalyan
user_5359 (2020-01-10 10:25:59+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM.
Deine Aussage ist flasch, die Wache ist seit über 10 Jahren existent (https://www.osm.org/node/391683510/history). Eine Beschreibung mit den Schlüssel name und description ist übrigens generell nicht ausreichend. 
Ich habe die Informationen zusammengeführt.
A67-A67 (2020-01-10 22:41:03+00:00): Hallo dvdhoven,

Een knooppuntroute in een richting kun je taggen met oneway=yes. Dan komt deze door de validatie van Knooppuntnet en is het niet nodig om een virtuele terugweg toe te voegen.

Zie ook https://github.com/vmarc/knooppuntnet/issues/1
dvdhoven (2020-01-11 06:31:16+00:00): Bedankt!
Ik wist dat je er mee bezig geweest was.
Dit is dus de oplossing
tanish1980 (2020-01-16 08:56:54+00:00): Anchana,
The mapping you have done is excellent and well appreciated. please continue the same.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79406434
tanish1980 (2020-01-16 08:53:30+00:00): Ashik,
The mapping you have done is excellent and well appreciated. please continue the same.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79406776
RicoElectrico (2020-01-10 23:44:46+00:00): Contains fake objects. Reverted.
user_5359 (2020-01-10 10:36:10+00:00): Hello! Is "peachtree Road highrise" a shop http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
freebeer (2020-01-11 11:52:48+00:00): georg, many thanks for cleaning this poorly-designed-app spam.

i would guess from the name (if it is not just a description for personal use - and it needs capitalisation to Peachtree, and if the proper name, Highrise), that it should be tagged like the nearby https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/269196206 as a block of flats - or, None Of The Above  :-)
BCNorwich (2020-01-23 14:59:42+00:00): I've removed your fiction.
mueschel (2020-01-11 13:58:35+00:00): Please make sure you only add tags that are intended for the OSM database. The tools you used added some 'dupe' tags on several nodes.
EditConscript (2020-01-11 16:03:02+00:00): i do not understand, could you please guide me on the issue than demand? i am new here btw
EditConscript (2020-01-11 16:14:54+00:00): Just checked the nodes again, and do not see 'dupe' tags?
mueschel (2020-01-11 16:30:57+00:00): I removed these tags already, they were on these three nodes I edited:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79452169

I guess you used the tool mapwithai - it somehow randomly adds these tags and the user has to remove them again.
ForstEK (2020-01-11 13:50:52+00:00): Here was an error of Level0, i don't know why.
user_5359 (2020-01-10 10:18:48+00:00): Nocheinmal Hallo! Ich habe mich schon gewundert, da ich nur auf die Sperren geachtet hatte und ich dort keine Änderung feststellen konnte. Leider waren Deine Änderungen nicht ausreichend genug. Ich habe jetzt mal sowhl die Tore als auch die Wege entsprechend angepasst.
ForstEK (2020-01-11 13:50:43+00:00): Here was an error of Level0, i don't know why.
ForstEK (2020-01-11 13:50:27+00:00): Here was an error of Level0, i don't know why.
UT93 (2020-12-24 11:08:51+00:00): Die Bushaltestelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6533638554 welche eigentlich irgendwie nie so richtig eine war, ist seit der dortigen Strassensanierung nicht mehr existent. Die Zickzacklinie am Boden wurde entfernt, die Tafel, falls überhaupt jemals eine vorhanden war, ebenso. Der Bus hält dort also nicht mehr.
Die Plattform https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696046992 dient neu nur noch als Ausstiegsplattform an der Zielhaltestelle. Zum Einsteigen wurde gegenüber eine neue Plattform errichtet.
sovereign_ch (2020-12-25 09:45:42+00:00): Vielen Dank, grade mit CS 96414921 aktualisert. Schöne Festtage.
UT93 (2021-03-03 21:38:09+00:00): Die Bushaltestelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/697869421 wurde kürzlich verlegt. Sie befindet sich neu gerade bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2477991645 .
Der Standort der Haltestelle in der Gegenrichtung wurde beibehalten, der Wartebereich jedoch mit einer Erhöhung für die Passagiere versehen.
UT93 (2021-03-03 21:40:28+00:00): Der Wartebereich https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/695813181 weist seit Kurzem einen Unterstand auf.
sovereign_ch (2021-03-04 17:11:58+00:00): Aktualisiert mit CS 100436611 (Hallenbad) und CS 100436674 (Schulhaus).
abakus_uploader (2020-01-10 23:32:04+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
marc__marc (2020-12-08 23:08:12+00:00): Hello,
can you improve the wording for "vmap0 is inaccurate".
what's inaccurate ? tag ? geoloc ?
Regards,
Marc
Trastevere (2020-12-09 23:15:54+00:00): Hi marc_marc, thanks for reaching out. I did not add the vmap0 tag you mentioned I just split this road where it crosses the riverbank here to create a ford. It looks like it may have been added years ago by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AND%20Data.
marc__marc (2020-12-10 09:00:02+00:00): Hello,
ho yes you 're right, the fixme exist before the split, added 7 year ago https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236396696/history
I'm removing wrong origin=AND_DATA : origin is about the cuisine and product in a shop or restaurant
Regards,
Marc
Thanks.
czubi (2020-01-11 15:25:06+00:00): Hey, hat das einen Grund warum die aus der Fläche einen node gemacht hast?
sephiroth90 (2020-01-15 09:00:16+00:00): Sorry, dachte es wäre korrekter, wenn ich das als node mache und nicht als Fläche. Soll ich es wieder ändern?
czubi (2020-01-15 09:18:29+00:00): Na eigentlich war es ja vorher detaillierter mit dem landuse. Das wiki schreibt auch "Das Attribut sollte pro Kindergarten nur einmal verwendet werden, am besten am Grundstück, wenn das nicht möglich ist am Punkt. (Ausnahme: z.B. mehrere verschiedene Kindergärten im gleichen Gebäude)"
Habs für dich mal revertet, dann ist es wie vorher. Den Namen habe ich übernommen.
sephiroth90 (2020-01-15 09:58:26+00:00): Okay, mist, da habe ich nicht ordentlich recherchiert. Danke!
SpaLeo (2020-06-24 13:48:21+00:00): Achte wenn du Wege von path auf footway änderst darauf bicycle=yes zu setzen. Außer natürlich es sind wirklich reine Fußwege, die es in diesem Bereich in Park aber kaum gibt. Du hast bei deinen Änderungen Radrouten durchbrochen.
viloan (2020-01-10 10:05:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Prusaker (2020-02-04 10:37:31+00:00): По факту остановочный пункт закрыт. Не совсем ясно зачем его снова обозначать?
maraf24 (2020-01-10 11:30:14+00:00): Wycofane.
frosm (2020-01-10 12:21:35+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
il n'y a aucune raison de supprimer une voie sous prétexte qu'elle est privée.
en effet les maisons sont aussi privées, cela n’empêche pas tous les bases et cartes au monde de les reprendre.
si la voie en question dispose d'un panneau "accès privé", il suffit d'ajouter cette restriction d'accès.
Si vous voulez vraiment renseigner la propriété privé, il existe l'attribut owner=private, il est cependant quasi jamais utilisé.
Si la voie ne dispose d'aucun panneau, il n'y a rien de spécial à faire, celle-ci étant alors accessible par ex au livreur.
Vu la déserte du bâtiment situé au no 13B  par cette voie, je suppose que c'est une voie dite de service et qu'il n'est pas interdit de l'utiliser pour accéder à ce bâtiment.
n'hésitez pas à lancer le tutoriel pour découvrir la base de l'outil qui est plus nuancé que "j'efface" :-)
j'ai rajouté d'autres voies de déserte pour vous montrer le principe.
Bonne continuation.
frosm (2020-01-10 12:26:12+00:00): voir vers les no 4 11a 12 15 et 27
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/47.81212/-4.17712
EdLoach (2021-11-18 16:06:36+00:00): Interestingly (at least to me) the legislation has just caught up with the signage. The 8 tonne 1993 restriction officially became 7.5 tonnes on 15 November 2021!
shiftee (2020-03-03 22:58:19+00:00): Are you sure about the following two areas being quarry?
The Maxar imagery (2018) seems to show green fields.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762212534

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762212527
pittrichimica (2020-03-22 05:22:43+00:00): You are right. I corrected it to field. Seems it was a copy/paste error. Sorry for that...
Stay healthy, everyone...
PT-53 (2020-01-10 13:27:56+00:00): Bitte noch
atm=yes
am Gebäudeumriß löschen.
PT-53 (2020-02-16 13:17:37+00:00): erledigt
km2bp (2020-01-11 13:56:51+00:00): Witaj coś poszło nie tak . Drogi zostały zdublowane https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/294880900#map=17/51.83993/15.90960.  Gdybyś chciał  robić bardzo szczegółowe mapy nie tylko  na podstawie zdjęć satelitarnych to polecam apkę do zbierania śladów GPS  OSMtrcker. jaki jest  pożytek z drobiazgowej szczegółowości wyjaśniam w tym filmie. 
 https://youtu.be/8O2OEGL6i3k  Pozdrawiam.
km2bp (2020-01-11 13:58:31+00:00): OSMTracker
aceman444 (2020-03-11 09:00:51+00:00): Hi, creating an attraction without any name or other properties is not useful. Also, if you wanted to mark the Cumil (Man at work) statue, that one was already mapped. Please be more careful next time.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 22:08:20+00:00): removido
marc__marc (2020-04-09 22:52:41+00:00): Bonjour,
il y a une confusion dans le tag sources,
c'est source sans le S final.
à noter que vous pouvez aussi indiquer la source pour l'ensemble du groupe de modification.
a noter aussi que dans la mesure du possible, on essaye de conserver les objets en les modifiant au lieu de supprimer recréer. cela permet de garder l'historique, bien utile si quelqu'un se met par exemple à afficher une imagerie sat périmée.
Cordialement,
Marc
cmunoz (SIG CA Val Parisis) (2020-04-10 07:20:49+00:00): Bonjour Marc,

Je te remercie pour ton retour. Pour le tag c'est une erreur de notre part d'il y a quelques mois lors du début de cette vaste mise à jour. Actuellement nous indiquons bien "source" pour le tag. Concernant la suppression de l'objet on est parti du principe que si un bâtiment est totalement détruit et un nouveau reconstruit, on supprime le polygone et on en recrée un nouveau. Avons nous tord?
fgouget (2020-04-30 19:54:56+00:00): Pourquoi '3 months' dans le champ maxspeed ? Typo dans le nom du champ ?
Kalepom (2020-04-30 19:56:45+00:00): Oui, effectivement, l'autocomplétion est allée plus vite que moi. C'est maxstay=
Merci
user_5359 (2020-01-10 14:24:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Valor Naram (2020-01-10 12:01:04+00:00): See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Valor_Naram/validation#Playgrounds_mapped_as_relation for this. Please also use the key http://wiki.osm.org/Key:playground: orthogonally and equally.
mavl (2020-02-02 11:20:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80431948 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3428].
majkaz (2020-01-14 08:40:29+00:00): Zdravím. 
Prosím o ponechávání adresního bodu v původní poloze, a přidání té školy na nový bod. Navíc to jméno je sice správné, ale jako name= by mělo být něco "krátkého, obecně používaného". Tady netuším, co by to mělo být, nejlépe asi "Soukromá střední a jazyková škola". Paradoxně bude problém to s tím originálním jménem vyhledat.
hannaklimovich (2020-01-17 14:02:35+00:00): Hello majkaz,
Thank you for advise. I've fixed it on "Soukromá střední a jazyková škola".
As I know it doesn't matter how to add new object and addition tags on OSM (I mean everyone may add new amenity using point or building poligon), there is no common rule how to do it. I added school in address poi because I didn't want to make duplicate data coping address info.
eggie (2020-01-10 14:30:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review... Kijk in de wiki hoe zoiets  te mappen. Zie welkomstmail... 
name=Mariabeeldje kun je weer verwijderen. Dat kan in de description. 
Wanneer het een kapel is dan amenity=place _of_worship

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
MVG,
Eggie