piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
AlanStans (2017-07-22 18:04:29+00:00): Drove along today. Only change is painting at the south end and a no entry except cycles  Just painted bike lane north bound at the junction for short distance, rest of road seems to be still two way.  
Link at North end unchanged.

I have edited road to show only one way just at the southern end.  Anyone know how to put the cycles allowed bit?

Not sure whether new cycle path is open as per comment from Dave F, but has been built.
AlanStans (2017-07-22 18:06:32+00:00): Just noted cycle path for that bit exists, so should be good.
AlanStans (2017-07-22 18:07:52+00:00): Meaning the cycle path at south end of AVon cresent to allow cycles in.
ndm (2017-07-22 18:25:27+00:00): Cheers for that -- obviously an area to keep an eye on -- the Ashton Avenue Bridge is was open today too -- strangely no separate cycleway -- just a wideish pavement.
AlanStans (2017-07-22 20:07:09+00:00): The bus route from Ashton Bridge to Cumberland road has also been built (hence my move of the railway platform - yet to be rebuilt) but I cant work out how to draw a bus only route!
DaveF (2017-07-22 20:42:36+00:00): I've just added the route over Ashton Bridge. I've tweeted MetroBus to confirm that section's a guided busway:  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509467560

I took the tags from Cambridge except I've kept is a construction for now:
www.openstreetmap.org/way/93272889
DaveF (2017-07-28 16:13:58+00:00): Metrobus confirm this section is to be guided, but unclear of the extent.
emergency99 (2017-07-21 19:09:41+00:00): stop posting that as a name
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-12-18 14:31:56+00:00): Hi there. Could you tell me what's going on with the historic_1=yes tag on Dublin House here? I've never seen that before and I'm confused.

you also added a node with a building tag *inside* the other building. I've removed that, since that doesn't make sense
RinIRL (2017-12-18 19:03:40+00:00): probably an error on early edit going off the keys in the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic

There's a bookshop within part of the overall building but the whole building is not a bookshop hence why it was done like that.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-12-20 13:40:33+00:00): OK, maybe do you wanna fix it up? 🙂
Supaplex (2017-08-13 04:13:23+00:00): 這樣不對呦
Don't map for render
Carina Su (2017-08-13 15:32:46+00:00): 這幾天會更新，謝謝。
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-24 15:54:07+00:00): Hi, I see you have added access=no to ways 16533193 and 16533219. These are footways and have foot=permissive on them, so access=no has no effect other than to cause confusion as to what was intended. If you intended there to be no pedestrian access, please remove foot=permissive, otherwise, please remove access=no.

Thanks,
Mike
SomeoneElse (2017-07-24 16:13:42+00:00): @Mike For info see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50175156 and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Broadmarsh_Re-development - it's very much a work in progress at the moment.
dieterdreist (2019-11-15 12:56:42+00:00): Ho notato che hai modificato alcuni motor_vehicle=private in motor_vehicle=no, cosa mi sembra molto improbabile, visto che parliamo di strade su una piazza pubblica. Al solito ci sono autorizzati (polizia ecc.) che possono usare queste strade. Access=no è appropriato quando _nessuno_ po' prendere al strada (per esempio perché pericoloso / franata / ecc.)
JamesKingdom (2017-07-21 20:14:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50468512 where the changeset comment is: Doodle
Hjart (2017-07-21 20:30:33+00:00): Please make sure that your changeset titles reflects your edits. This edit obviously has nothing to do with any hotosm project
guyporter (2017-07-21 21:06:34+00:00): Sincere appologies. I realise the error. It won't happan again. Sorry.
guyporter (2017-07-21 21:15:04+00:00): Just read your profile mate. I'm a new boy on the OSM, and want to contribute, a lot. Believe it or not have been working the last 17 year producing digital maps of Denmark and the rest of the Nordic countries for a well known international company. Any advice would be very welcomed. :-)
Hjart (2017-07-21 21:16:14+00:00): I didn't intend to cause a guilt trip. Welcome to our little project and thank you for your contributions so far.
Hjart (2017-07-21 21:22:39+00:00): Ok, I'll keep an eye on your first edits and point out any obvious mistakes :-). OSM obviously is a very different beast from commercial closed projects with some very different challenges, so I'm sure there will be some :-)
guyporter (2017-07-21 21:45:57+00:00): Cheers mate. :-)
JamesKingdom (2017-07-21 20:14:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50468500 where the changeset comment is: Doodle
JamesKingdom (2017-07-21 20:13:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50468490 where the changeset comment is: Doodle
changchun_1 (2017-11-25 10:45:29+00:00): Hallo gpermant,
Keep right https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=en&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch60=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch350=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=6&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=49.14475&lon=9.20487&zoom=19&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C20%2C60%2C300%2C360%2C390

Meldet hier einen Fehler mit dem Baum. Kannst du nachschauen ob da ein Schreibfehler vorliegt. Kenne mich mit Bäumen nicht so aus.
gpermant (2017-11-25 16:06:32+00:00): Wer meldet den Fehler?

Ich war da im Juli, der Baum steht an der Spitze der beiden Wege.
changchun_1 (2017-11-26 11:21:25+00:00): Das Tool siehe link oben. Fehlermeldung lautet "This node is tagged 'genus=quercus' where "quercus" looks like "Quercus".  OK hab den Fehler gerfunden laut wiki muss der Wert groß geschrieben sein. Hab es korrigiert.
gpermant (2017-11-27 18:24:20+00:00): Ich sehe weder ein tool noch eine Fehlermeldung links oben.
In welcher Ansicht?

Das finde ich absolutely strange.
Weder das Englische noch das Lateinische (quercus robur = die Steineiche) kennt groß geschriebene Substantive!
Wer verantwortet dieses "tool"? Ich würde ihn gerne anschreiben.

Ich werde meine Baumgattungen weiterhin klein schreiben. Vllt kann der Autor des Tools gar kein Latein...?
gpermant (2017-11-27 18:26:28+00:00): Ich staune: der online-OSM-Editor bietet mir tatsächlich eine Reihe von Baum-Gattungen an, und schreibt alle groß...
gpermant (2017-11-27 18:35:51+00:00): Und unter https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/genus#values finde ich über 400T Einträge von key:genus, und die allermeisten Gattungen sind groß geschrieben. Ist allerdings im Wiki nicht beschrieben, dass und warum. Naja.
changchun_1 (2017-11-28 16:16:15+00:00): Hat mich auch gewundert, da ja sonst alles klein geschrieben wird. Kannst ja im Forum mal nachfragen warum das so ist, oder vielleicht schreibt es auch einer hier.
gpermant (2017-11-28 16:24:23+00:00): Vielleicht der Respekt vor Latin Language... ;-)

Danke, das du die wieder geöffnete Ilsfelder Straße in U'gruppenbach samt Kreisel wieder aufgemacht hast.
Habe heute morgen gesehen, dass wieder offen ist. Lang genug hat's gedauert...
nammala (2017-07-27 06:53:39+00:00): Hi Danny, May I know the reason behind changing the place tag from town to hamlet
LogicalViolinist (2017-08-22 14:52:26+00:00): It's a very small town in(Heckston) North Grenville. Like <1000 people live there. Same with Actons Corners and Pleton's Corner
Jame Thomas (2017-07-21 18:44:17+00:00): Tagondaing တံခွန်တိုင်
eggie (2017-07-21 19:19:38+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-21 19:26:56+00:00): Info samengevoegd met BAG adresnode nr 39. Anders data-vervuiling door twee identieke adressen.
smaprs (2017-07-22 00:52:22+00:00): Olá, qual é a fonte de onde vc tirou estes nomes? Vc conhece a rua?
Kewen (2017-07-31 12:50:15+00:00): Eu conheço sim, alias é a rua que eu moro! Obrigado!
smaprs (2017-07-31 13:56:07+00:00): Ok, de fato está conforme o mapa da Prefeitura. Obrigado.
SomeoneElse (2019-07-18 15:08:30+00:00): Hello,
(from a discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70364367 )
I'm not quite sure what http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=3430824 is supposed to be. It started out as a large "wood" multipolygon, but is now some sort of boundary?
Best Regards,
Andy
Chetan_Gowda (2017-07-25 05:14:27+00:00): Hi panoramedia, I've noticed that the city "Rason" has been away of 4.93 K. Can I know the reason behind it?
panoramedia (2017-07-25 07:41:22+00:00): The thing is, there actually is no city Rason. There is 라진 (Rajin) and 선봉 (Sonbom). Koreans like to build these composites, So Rason is a composite from the first syllables of both twin cities. It's als the name of the province and special economic zone. Thus I placed it inbetween the two places.
panoramedia (2017-07-25 08:45:57+00:00): You can learn more about the twin-city Rason here: https://koreanologie.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/p_koreanologie/North_Korean_Cities/Rason/Rason.pdf
oormilavinod (2017-07-26 06:27:57+00:00): hey  bulldoghot12 !!welcome to OSM, I appreciate your interest in mapping. I notice that you have traced a large area and classified as a park, this area looks too hi=uge and does not look like one in the imagery. could you please confirm the source? have a great day
bulldoghot12 (2017-07-26 14:33:29+00:00): Sorry, not a park. I deleted it.
gbm1 (2017-08-17 06:40:01+00:00): Hallo meeperz,
leider ist durch deinen Eintrag das MA:DORO jetzt doppelt erfasst und wird von Diensten wie maps.me unvollständig angezeigt. Ich hatte das MA:DORO bereits unter dem Änderungssatz #47447486 (weitgehend) komplett angelegt. Zugegeben, wenn jemand "Madoro" eingibt, findet er nichts, aber das Restaurant heißt nun mal MA:DORO.

Mein Vorschlag: ich nehme in meinen Datensatz den tag description=Madoro auf, dieser wird von den meisten Suchmaschinen auch gefunden und deinen Datensatz löschen wir. Ist das i.O?
gbm1 (2017-08-27 10:25:46+00:00): Hallo meeperz,
ich habe meinem Eintrag den tag short_name=madoro hinzugefügt. Dieser wird zuverlässig von den Suchmaschinen gefunden. Wenn ich in den nächsten Tagen nichts von dir höre werde ich deinen Eintrag löschen.
Gruß gbm1
Alecs01 (2017-07-21 20:15:56+00:00): What is that? a monument in the middle of the street called "dedis traaki"? What did you wanted to map?
eggie (2017-07-21 20:58:02+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
Commodoortje (2017-07-22 12:02:36+00:00): Ik heb de typefouten, en tags aangepast. 
Hier kun je zien wat ik heb gewijzigd.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50480044
eggie (2017-07-22 12:34:49+00:00): Wellicht kan addr:city=....  er ook nog bij.
eggie (2017-07-22 12:37:30+00:00): IJsselstein toegevoegd
Commodoortje (2017-07-22 17:53:48+00:00): Je hebt helemaal gelijk, inmiddels de bestaande adresnode samengevoegd
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50486266
eggie (2017-07-22 19:14:15+00:00): oke.. die kon ik even niet vinden. :)
eggie (2017-07-21 20:14:23+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-21 20:17:56+00:00): Alleen een naam ergens op heeft geen enkele zin. name:nl moet ook gewoon name zijn. name:nl wordt alleen in Friesland toegepast.
eggie (2017-07-22 08:12:43+00:00): shop antiques toegevoegd
jbwalters22 (2017-07-21 19:49:10+00:00): Edited Apartment Complexs
Alecs01 (2017-07-21 20:16:57+00:00): Already on the map: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/718857126
Johnny Mapperseed (2017-07-21 19:52:49+00:00): Gah! Forgot to change the default comment. Sorry about the wrong hashtag!
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-21 20:38:07+00:00): Hi MaximLi28, welcome to OSM. Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50467973
oormilavinod (2017-07-26 06:09:00+00:00): hey, Mehal welcome to OSM, I appreciate your interest in mapping. but I have noticed that you have added a polygon that defines as a park, but this also covers some building . could you please verify
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-07-31 08:37:39+00:00): "Lycée" means "high school" - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509309950 erroneously tagged it as a park but it has been deleted and replaced with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351676144 which correctly models it as amenity=school.
eggie (2017-07-21 20:12:52+00:00): Van zo'n eilandje ga je op deze manier niets zien.
Je moet het dan toevoegen als inner in de multipolygon van het water. eigenlijk hoort het water weer als inner in de multipolygon van het gras.
Begrijp je wat ik bedoel.
Vincent Jacobs (2017-07-21 20:14:24+00:00): Bedankt! Ik had zelf ook gezien dat er iets niet klopte, met een merge-actie ging het beter, volgens mij kunnen we die zometeen bekijken.
eggie (2017-07-21 20:38:05+00:00): Die multipolygonen maken gaat niet echt jofel met editor iD.. als het al gaat..
Je kunt als je echt zulke zaken wilt mappen beter overstappen naar editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2017-07-21 20:42:39+00:00): De validator van JOSM vindt het helemaal goed....ben benieuwd :)
eggie (2017-07-21 20:44:07+00:00): Deze layer laat het al zien. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50468109#map=17/52.37188/4.81328&layers=H
oormilavinod (2017-07-26 06:03:38+00:00): 
hey Kelkamon, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
dgitto (2017-07-22 05:58:10+00:00): Ciao. Ma questo edifici con nome "Campo Calabro"?
Di che si tratterebbe?
cotroneo79 (2017-07-22 13:09:06+00:00): Ciao, sto muovendo i primi passi per con la digitazione del Comune. Ora sistemo il tutto. Grazie
dgitto (2017-07-22 13:45:40+00:00): Ok quindi è il municipio. Buon mapping
dgitto (2017-07-22 06:04:24+00:00): Ciao. Secondo me, se sei della zona ci sarebbero cose più prioritarie degli edifici (i nomi delle strade soprattutto, poi le scuole, le farmacie, i benzinai, le banche, i supermercati)
Gli edifici come vedi a reggio calabria sono stati importati in blocco
RicoElectrico (2018-07-07 22:20:52+00:00): Cześć,

Spójrz proszę na uwagę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1447532
Commodoortje (2017-07-22 05:50:07+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-07-22 05:51:21+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
Commodoortje (2017-07-22 06:20:01+00:00): Hier zit niet "het Spanjaardsgat" 
De historische waterpoort ligt tussen de Granaattoren en Duiventoren, en is reeds aanwezig binnen OSM.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2043183726
Ik heb daarom uw bijdrage verwijderd.
Een veel gemaakte fout met maps.me is dat een monument aangemaakt wordt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=monument
Deze key wordt heel vaak onterecht gebruikt, omdat veel objecten die in gangbaar Nederlands worden aangeduid met het woord 'monument' dit in OSM context niet zijn. Lees eerst de paragraaf Waarschuwingen voor je besluit deze tag toe te passen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:historic%3Dmonument#Waarschuwingen
oormilavinod (2017-07-26 06:02:32+00:00): hey Buttered Popcorn !! welcome to OSM, i appreciate you interest to map. but i have noticed that you have added a polygon that identifies as a park over the building. please  add the ground reality to the map. reverting this change. happy mapping
Gumeg (2017-08-08 19:24:13+00:00): У вас в последних правках одни и те же комментарии.. Это совсем не хорошо и не понятно для других.. Кому вы пишите "что не так исправьте"??
Supaplex (2017-10-01 14:58:54+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
nammala (2017-07-25 05:45:49+00:00): Hi Zowie polie,

Noticed that you have been deleting lot of valuable data. I have reverted your changeset. Please make sure the data in the OSM is crowd sourced and the data is so valuable please don't delete the data.

Regards,
nammala
woodpeck (2017-10-03 00:05:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
tekim (2017-07-28 16:20:14+00:00): Hi Raymond, I noticed that you are editing the names of peaks to include the elevation in feet. You probably were not aware of this, but the name tag is for the name only[1].  Elevation should be placed in the ele tag[2]
Mike

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele
Raymo853 (2017-09-07 20:38:39+00:00): Hello. I would argue the elevation is part of the name.
Raymo853 (2017-09-07 20:39:02+00:00): It is often the most useful information for peaks.
tekim (2017-09-07 21:21:41+00:00): Raymond, Yes, the elevation information is   very useful for peaks, but it belongs in the ele tag, and in most cases, is already included in that tag.  We should not tag for the renderer.  If you would like the elevation in feet to show up on the standard rendering, perhaps submit a pull request for the standard style, although I am not sure the maintainers  are willing or able to have country specific rendering and the rest of the world pretty much uses meters. Mike
tekim (2017-09-07 21:33:19+00:00): I posted this question to the tagging mailing list to get input from the wider community.  I would have cc'ed you, but I don't think I have your email address. You might want to subscribe to that list if you are not already in order to participate in the discussion and explain your point of view.
n76 (2017-09-07 21:50:03+00:00): Putting the elevation in the name field is flat out wrong. Elevation should be in the ele=* field and the renderer can, if the developer of the renderer desires, be shown along with the name.

Consider that this data and the maps made from it could be used by a person desiring metric elevations. You can easily convert the well defined values in the ele=* field when rendering (I convert from meters to feet for my maps). But converting a value in a field that expected to be text only like the name field is not possible without lots of artificial intelligence.

Basically you are breaking the map for many, many users.

FWIW I render the elevation along with the names of peaks on the paper topo maps I create for my own use. In fact, I render the elevation tag even if there is no name on the peak. Basically the same as the old USGS topos did it. And even though the peak elevations in the areas I've created maps for are in meters, my maps are in feet.

There are some maps that already use the elevation field like http://www.hikebikemap.org That has an international orientation so the elevations are in meters but it does show others care and need to have the elevation in the ele=* tag and not polluting the name text.
Raymo853 (2017-09-07 21:52:54+00:00): Is it possible to have the elevation in the proper tag but have tags for both SI and English units?
mvexel (2017-09-07 21:54:33+00:00): Hi Raymo853 -- tekim is correct, you want to use the `ele` tag to note the elevation. The information in OpenStreetMap needs to be a little bit structured for everyone to be able to make sense of it. That is why we separate the names of things out in one tag, and have other useful information go into designated other tags (like `ele` for elevation, `opening_hours` for opening hours, etcetera. Anyone who would want to make a map with the elevations of peaks prominently displayed can still do this. They would just need to look for an available `ele` value. There are already over 5 million objects in OSM with `ele` attribute, so if we all adhere to this standard, we keep the data consistent. Thanks and happy mapping!
Raymo853 (2017-09-07 21:56:34+00:00): I was adding the elevation in meters to the tag, but also adding it in feet to the name. I do not understand how having more info in the name field can cause such chaos.
mvexel (2017-09-07 21:59:35+00:00): It's not chaos :) It's just that people expect a name when they query the name tag, just as they would expect to see elevation (in meters) when they query the ele tag. Anyone who wants to create a map with elevation in feet prominently displayed can query the ele tag and do the conversion. Having elevation in both meters and feet in the data is redundant.
Raymo853 (2017-09-07 22:02:29+00:00): Thanks for the clarification mvex*. It just seemed other were making remarks without understanding I was putting meters into the elevation tag and thereby was causing all sorts of terror and heartache for all users.
n76 (2017-09-07 22:06:47+00:00): "I do not understand how having more info in the name field can cause such chaos." -- Because it is not expected and hard for a renderer to remove. If I create a map of an area you tagged this way the elevation will be shown twice (with different formatting). In addition, lots of people do searches with exact matches and they won't be expecting to have to remember the foot based elevation to have the search complete.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-11-05 10:57:43+00:00): name is for name only.

Adding height in feet is tagging for renderer - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Raymo853 (2017-11-07 16:26:14+00:00): Hello Mateusz. Thanks for the reference. I have already changed my practice and have been un-dong the feet elevations when I find them.
woodpeck (2017-10-03 00:05:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
woodpeck (2017-10-03 00:05:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
kreuzschnabel (2018-01-28 16:51:31+00:00): Was willst du mit Abbiegebeschränkungen wie http://osm.org/relation/7410667 bezwecken? Router im PKW-Modus biegen sowieso nicht auf Radwege ab, und Routern im Radfahrer-Modus, die hier natürlich abbiegen dürften, wird es eigens verboten! Ich halte diese Abbiegebeschränkungen deshalb nicht nur für unnötig, sondern für geradezu falsch. Wo Rad- und Fußwege Fahrstraßen kreuzen, reichen die Default-Access-Werte der jeweiligen Ways vollkommen aus, um falsche Abbiegungen zu verhindern, da muss man normalerweise keine TRs setzen.
opendcc (2017-07-21 22:50:14+00:00): Hallo,

lade doch in JOSM bitte Bayern 80cm als Hintergrund.

Servus Wolfgang
oormilavinod (2017-07-26 05:56:29+00:00): hey Josbel89 . Welcome to OSM, I  appreciate your interest in mapping. but I noticed that you have added a zebra crossing tag to a nod at the corner of the park that is traced by you. I have fixed the tag. have anice day . happy mapping
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-22 06:36:36+00:00): Hi asmazhr. And again: Is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
Hjart (2017-07-21 22:29:47+00:00): Please note that we recommend that landuse polygons are kept separated from roads
Hjart (2017-07-21 22:40:16+00:00): I attempted an explanation for this in https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/47947643