piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
VeraKoDa (2022-07-21 10:16:34+00:00): Bedankt Eggie! 

Ik kom er straks nog een keer langs, dan zal ik de borden fotograferen en de juiste attributen toevoegen. 

Om zeker te zijn dat er verder geen verkeerde wijzigingen worden doorgevoerd, is het wellicht beter om mijn wijzigingen van vanmorgen volledig te verwijderen?  
Dan doe ik stapje voor stapje alles goed zetten :)
eggie (2022-07-21 10:25:08+00:00): De wijzigingen in deze changeset laat ik maar even zo.
Met de overpass https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123880283

kun je zien wat je hebt aangepast.
De voorgaande changeset met de privepaden kan ik wel reverten. 
Even kijken of het simpel kan, want ik heb landuse overlap hersteld.

Dan kun je het opnieuw bekijken.
eggie (2022-07-21 10:42:43+00:00): 

reverted on request by changeset #123887557

Het is weer zoals voor je begon.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-07-21 08:37:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-24 02:17:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9901325699/history

is vent at that location or somewhere else?

what kind of vent?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 09:33:17+00:00): "Unknown vent location tags will be added later" - when you will add them?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-07-29 09:34:35+00:00): I am planning to delete https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/28IS
abeck58 (2025-08-06 09:33:51+00:00): added them as sewer vents, they are for off gassing the land fill.
phd0 (2022-08-22 13:12:47+00:00): bonjour, j'ai déplacé les infos de DK Gones (café / coworking) sur le point existant plus bas plutôt que l'immeuble complet, car c'est avant tout un immeuble d'habitation. (et la forme de l'immeuble avait disparue)
Philippe
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Lancelotance (2022-07-21 08:22:14+00:00): 另，路径#1023987372的名字不规范，故删去
WoodWoseWulf (2022-07-22 00:12:01+00:00): Hello,

There doesn't appear to be a park here, this looks like it's someone's private home and yard.

We define parks in a particular way on OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
eggie (2022-07-21 08:39:04+00:00): Beste Gertrude Je hebt hier het hele gebouw met alle kadasterinfo verwijderd?
Waarom?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-21 08:40:13+00:00): reverted by changeset #123882118
eggie (2022-07-21 08:41:03+00:00): Alleen de naam heb ik verwijderd van de gebouw omtrek
Gr eggie
user_5359 (2022-07-26 08:43:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9901385985? What is the meaning of the tag genus:  = Beech? Did you miss a language code?
kapazao (2022-07-21 08:42:41+00:00): Trevélez, no Ugíjar
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Andrea Musuruane (2022-07-31 08:29:17+00:00): Ciao. Quella inserita è una sorgente o una fontanella di acqua potabile? Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123882463
popi (2022-09-14 20:12:35+00:00): è una fonte d'acqua. un tubo metallico che esce a lato strada, che è il troppo pieno della captazione dell'acqua che poi va in acquedotto.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-15 07:32:38+00:00): Ciao. Quel punto e' attaccato al Rio Guarabione ed è a 60 m dalla strada più vicina. Quindi direi che non è posizionato correttamente. Inoltre, nel tag name devono essere inseriti nomi comuni (quindi "fonte acqua" non va bene) ma solo nomi propri (se esistono). Se è una sorgente inoltre, il tag corretto è natural=spring + drinking_water=yes/no a seconda se l'acqua è potabile o meno: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:natural%3Dspring Ciao, Andrea
ruugie (2022-09-21 16:22:12+00:00): The buildings have bogus quality https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123882532 and will be deleted.
eggie (2022-07-21 08:51:56+00:00): Even een tip.. De format voor phone in OSM  is +31 ..  

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2022-08-27 10:43:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123882753
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
pyrog (2022-08-14 09:12:39+00:00): Itinéraire interrompu suite à la suppression ? de ways

https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/route/14021446/changes?pageIndex=0&impact=true

Corrections effectuées

Yves
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
mike140 (2022-08-21 20:04:01+00:00): навіщо ви додали будівлі до жилої зони у ролі inner? Тепер виходить що вони не відносяться до жилої зони
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:00:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Frans S (2022-08-29 10:27:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123884603
Frans S (2022-08-29 10:28:53+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123884603
bxl-forever (2022-07-21 11:20:58+00:00): Hello,

May I suggest enhancing MapComplete by adding an extra tag with the survey date, when adding "operational_status=closed".
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-07-21 11:56:12+00:00): Hi
First of all, this kind of questions should be asked on the issue tracker.

Second: no. In this case, I did only 'close' the elevator the day after the survey. Second, this date can be derived from the changeset metadata.

Kind regards, Pieter
Warin61 (2022-07-21 23:08:25+00:00): Hi,
Partially reverted this changeset to restore Admin Boundaries - Deep Creek.
Peter W34 (2022-07-22 03:18:04+00:00): Hi Warrin, Thanks for fixing my mistake. The Boundary must have been attached to a waterway that I changed in the area. I'll try to be more careful with edits like that. Peter.
Warin61 (2022-07-22 06:45:55+00:00): They are not easy, these admin boundaries. 

Looks to me like deep creep stops, in OSM, well before it should .. and you extended it along the admin boundary .. but the admin boundary stop short of where deep creek should end. 

If you just take deep creek by itself on a JOSM layer and extend it then you should be fine? Assuming the present Deep Creek way does not have anything else on it...
Peter W34 (2022-07-22 07:14:06+00:00): Thanks Warin, I'll have another look at it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Almhias (2022-07-21 09:57:11+00:00): Merci dir!
nevw (2022-07-21 12:17:55+00:00): Hi
Was the shop accidentally added to the map. There is no evidence of such a facility here.
nevw (2022-07-22 01:59:28+00:00): no response, deleted.
Landratsamt Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen - UNB (2022-07-21 09:58:40+00:00): Der Weg verläuft im Westen durch eine im Sommer abgezäunte Weidefläche und endet an einer Abbruchkante. Der östliche Teil ist nach einem Hochwasser nicht mehr vorhanden und wurde gelöscht. Beiden beiden in Nord-Süd-Richtung eingezeichneten Linien handelt es sich um keine Wege/Pfade, sondern um temporär wasserführende Gewässerbette. Die Linien wurden gelöscht.
clay_c@wonder (2022-07-21 14:53:50+00:00): My bad! Thanks for fixing this.
elsy1 (2022-07-22 10:09:17+00:00): آزادراه کنارگذر قم وجود ندارد و رسم شما باعث ایجاد مشکل در نقشه شده
elsy1 (2022-07-22 10:57:09+00:00): موردی دیگری هم در رابطه با رسم آزادراه 
 شوشتری و تهران شمال داشته اید که با اینکه آن جاده ها هنوز افتتاح نشده ولی شما اقدام حذف تگ در دست احداث کرده اید. ممنون میشم توضیح بدید در غیر این صورت مجبور به ارائه گزارش خواهم شد.
elsy1 (2022-07-22 11:06:33+00:00): I reverted this Changeset
Polarbear (2022-07-23 11:52:39+00:00): ... and validate https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9268818
Patr1k_P (2022-07-23 12:06:50+00:00): co sa tyka tej pivarnicky, tak si to neporobil moc dobre, mal si to nechat ako to bolo..teraz sa tam krizuju budovy, okrem toho budova je tam len jedna a ten podnik je sucastou ako aj trebars to fitnes...a vonkajsie sedenie uz bolo zadane formou outdoor_seating=yes, kedze si ho vsak zaznacil aj zvlast, potom si ho mal vymazat odtialto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080244616

v kazdom pripade to chce prerobit
Pavol33 (2022-07-23 14:25:15+00:00): Och prepac. To som netusil, ze to takto nie je spravne. Inspiroval som sa z inych miest, kde to takto je. Vies to prosim prerobit?
Patr1k_P (2022-07-23 15:51:58+00:00): vsak mohlo by to tak byt, akurat ten podnik mal byt ako bod a nie ako budova, stacilo teda len dokreslit vonkajsie sedenie...upravim to
aceman444 (2023-07-14 12:26:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9901614874
-> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dinsect_hotel

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680970291/history tu zase zrusena strecha nad pumpou.
wungasaurus (2022-07-21 18:26:44+00:00): Mühle restored in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123905184
Hedaja (2022-07-21 22:19:17+00:00): Hi

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass das Format der Telefonnummern icht ganz der Konvention in OSM entspricht.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone

Für noya müsste es zB nicht: 0681 98 91 59 63
Sonder. +49 681 98915963 oder +49-681-98915963

Nicht standardisierte Nummern können sonst eventuell von Anwendungen nicht korrekt verarbeiter/angezeigt werden
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-07-21 10:26:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 123574058, 123576459, 123576672, 123576764, 123730929.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
vasony (2022-08-08 21:28:12+00:00): Buszforduló utca törléséhez:

https://net.jogtar.hu/rendelet?council=fovaros&dbnum=104&docid=A06T0102.FOV
kogutowicz-mano (2022-08-09 03:58:50+00:00): Huh!
Köszi!
Gondoskodom róla.
VLD189 (2022-07-27 21:03:06+00:00): Hello Nuraddin, 
I was just curious about the name change of the road. You have deleted the previous name and added a new name. I believe you have some solid source behind this change. It will be great you share that source in the discussion. If you have any questions or would like to reach out, please feel free to do so. Thank you so much!
user_5359 (2022-07-22 10:51:23+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1080247861, https://www.osm.org/way/1080247862. Please notice your typo: Use access=yes instead of acess=yes. But why did you add this to ways without any other OSM keys?
eggie (2022-07-21 12:27:43+00:00): Dag D00L  Door schuiven met de kaart heb je adresnode Oude Molenweg 52 ergens anders in de gemeente gezet
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123887745

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-21 12:36:50+00:00): De adresnode heb ik teruggelegd.
Ook de gebruikte luchtfoto is al weer gedateerd. Er zijn recentere beschikbaar.

Bv https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=21-07-2021&loc=52.26732%2C6.802694%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-05-09&acqid=20220509_104751_SV1-03&sensor=SuperView-1
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
eggie (2022-07-21 12:06:58+00:00): Hi arcous.. No name for this campsite?

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-07-21 12:24:15+00:00): added campingname Tussen Wad en Strand
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
aceman444 (2023-07-10 14:30:04+00:00): Zdravim, to co je za znacku fitness_station=workoutové_ihrisko_talichova na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034483208 ?

To nijako nezodpoveda popisu na
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fitness%20station . Len nejaky preklep?
Pavol33 (2023-07-10 17:10:59+00:00): Neviem co presne myslis. To som robil asi strasne davno
aceman444 (2023-07-11 13:27:49+00:00): No pred rokom. Znacka "fitness_station" na cvicisku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034483208 .
aceman444 (2023-07-13 10:04:18+00:00): Tiez odobratie building=roof z
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25614417 asi nie je velmi odovodnene, predpokladam, ze pumpa ma strechu. Ci ju uz zburali?
Ale inak pridanie znaciek pre pumpu OK.
Tiez umyvacky Slovnaftu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184582104) maju myslim nazov Wash, nie Slovnaft. V 'brand' ci 'operator' Slovnaft samozrejme moze byt.

A ihrisko https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184582548 sa naozaj vola Kocky, alebo ste chceli len povedat, ze su tam preliezky v tvare kociek? Lebo to by potom nepatrilo do nazvu.
Pavol33 (2023-07-13 10:10:10+00:00): Zdravim,
tu strechu prosim opravite, ja velmi neviem, co tym myslite a ci som to ja urobil.  Lebo standartne Vam to ukazuje toho posledneho, co robil zmeny, ale to neznamena, ze som to ja robil. 
hej ihrisko sa vola kocky, to je dost specialne ihrisko
Slovnaft som vybral, lebo to tam je iba tato moznost v mape Slovnaft - Autoumyvaren
Dakujem
aceman444 (2023-07-13 10:32:53+00:00): Dakujem, popravujem to.
Tu strechu ste urcite urobili Vy (alebo mozno Vas editor iD automaticky, treba davat pozor co robi).
A tie jeho navrhy objektov (a hlavne oprav chyb) tiez nie su velmi slavne, casto viac skody ako uzitku.
aceman444 (2023-07-14 11:00:19+00:00): Hotovo.
Este som vratil spat povodny bod pumpy Lukoil a znacky Slovnaftu dal na tento bod, nech je vidiet historia, ze tam boli pred tym ine pumpy:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/271927033/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
ottorol (2022-10-31 06:33:52+00:00): по тропе вдоль бывшей базы отдыха Иж-авто. Может стоит её убрать? её там фактически нет.
askras (2022-10-31 08:05:49+00:00): Да, наверное можно. Этим летом была больше похожа на старый заросший противопожарный ров, чем на тропу. Только предлагаю не удалять, а поставить префикс жизненного цикла abandoned:
syntex (2022-07-22 11:56:07+00:00): You have added an object only with name=Norgpol tag. If you want it to render on the map, you have to add additional tags. I think, that in this case, office=company tag would be ok.
Nicolas Vial (2022-07-22 12:13:26+00:00): yes, perfect, thanks.
dcapillae (2022-07-21 13:22:49+00:00): Buenas tardes.

Estos objetos ya estaban en el mapa. Uno es una placa conmemorativa y el otro es un grafiti mural.

Gracias por los cambios. Por favor, evite añadir objetos por duplicado.


Atentamente,

Daniel Capilla
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-07-24 17:12:40+00:00): 朋友您好，您添加的“City of Nanjing” 在https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124017696 中被移除，因南京市的关系和节点在 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2131524 中已存在，且您标注的位置并非南京市的老城区之类存在特殊含义的地点，故将其移除。
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-07-24 17:13:37+00:00): 此外，建议朋友您在接下来的编辑中，使用较为有意义的变更集注释，不要用一个纯数字来代替，这不利于其他编辑者了解您做出了什么样的编辑。
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:00:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
vasony (2022-07-27 06:59:41+00:00): Szia!

A Bókay tér név honnan van?

Tamás
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
antonr (2022-08-04 10:08:34+00:00): Hej Niels,
Stien https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944457105 er ikke forbundet til stien syd for (944457107). Det ser ud til at dette changeset laver en sådan forbindelse... En del af stierne i dette område (bla. de to ovenstående) er MTB-spor bygget med tilladelse fra Naturstyrelsen, og der er for øjeblikket (altid?) postyr over folk der kører udenfor de autoriserede spor. Jeg synes det ville være godt hvis vi i OSM er omhyggelige med ikke at lede mtb-folk ud hvor de ikke må køre og dermed skabe konflikter...
mvh antonr
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-08-04 12:20:45+00:00): Men så giver det ikke mening at den er oneway=yes, for så kan man ikke køre på den.

Er oneway forkert, eller er den forbundet til noget andet?

Og på 
https://naturstyrelsen.dk/media/nst/67581/MTB_Nordskoven.pdf

Ser der ud til at være en del flere MTB spor.
antonr (2022-08-04 23:16:25+00:00): Enig, det er lidt sært... Men uanset om man i praksis kan køre på sporet (fx ved at trække/bære cyklen gennem skovbunden til startpunktet), så findes der ikke nogen synlig/lovlig sti der forbinder toppunktet, så det synes jeg ikke vi skal indikere (især jf. den aktuelle situation med piratspor).

Jeg er enig i at at brugen af oneway på mtb-spor er lidt uldent (i det hele taget og i dette tilfælde). Dedikerede mtb-spor er typisk bygget til envejskørsel, men de er (naturligvis) lovlige at benytte i begge retninger for fodgængere. Hvorvidt de er lovlige at køre i modsat retning på mtb er uklart for mig (men det er helt klart sært, upraktisk og også farligt til en hvis grad).

PDF'en du henviser til, ser ud til at være fra 2011, og svarer kun i nogen grad til virkeligheden anno 2022.

Hvis du ikke har være på stedet kan denne video måske give et indtryk af hvilken slags stier der er tale om: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvHFcHPjBOw
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:00:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
pza (2022-07-28 04:16:05+00:00): reverted a single erroneous node move in 124164461
mueschel (2022-08-08 09:47:17+00:00): Could it be that you mixed something up?  pay vs. park:
ref:easypay = 900063
ref:parkingpark = PLZ 9000 Zone 63
CreCrePL (2022-08-12 10:18:53+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124811703

Thanks :)
wkdgs (2022-07-27 08:26:35+00:00): Hi,

bei sowas bietet sich ein Lebenszyklus-Präfix an (z.B. destroyed):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Damit bleibt der Weg in der Datenbank und kann leichter wiederhergestellt werden, wenn sich etwas ändert.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123889351
Edelsalami (2022-10-03 16:12:34+00:00): Hallo Sandy, ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht, da sie unangemessen sind. Es war nicht notwendig die Wege zu löschen. Ich war vor Ort und habe die Barrieren bzw. den versperrten Weg konstruktiv gemappt. Anstatt Objekte zu löschen, sollte man die Tags passend aktualisieren. Gruß
aseidel (2022-07-27 07:54:30+00:00): Liebe Maja See, bitte Typo korrigieren bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101395435 (surface=unhewn_cobblestone), danke!
SekeRob (2022-07-21 11:31:54+00:00): Hat Tip to FinixFighter for providing the weblink to this artistry.
redd (2022-07-21 12:40:48+00:00): Danke!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
abakus_uploader (2022-07-21 22:30:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Bludator (2026-04-20 22:38:27+00:00): Dobrý den, neni zde překlep (artefakt copy&pasta)? Tady tyto body lokalit jsou pojmenovane "Omlenička" stjně jako nedaleká ves:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8815316919
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9901729973
jeslop (2022-07-21 17:18:37+00:00): Hola Paparrona. Has borrado al menos tres pasos de cebra en esta edición, la etiqueta highway=crossing es la que marca los pasos de peatones.

Saludos

Jesús López 
OpenStreetMap Foundation 
Data Working Group
Filip009CZ (2024-11-04 15:39:53+00:00): Zdravím, aký je zdroj tohto názvu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080260579/history ?
Milo_K (2024-11-04 16:02:49+00:00): Je to historický názov z obdobia Rakúska Uhorska, viaže sa k tomu zaujímavý historický príbeh.