piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SK53 (2021-04-14 20:35:02+00:00): Abney Park may have been an arboretum around 200 years ago, but certainly not now. Since the cemetery company ran out of cash (1970s IIRC) the place became quite wild with trees self-seeding and growing anywhere. It's full of strange things, which are growing wild: Service Tree of Fontainebleau, Various-leaved Hawthorn. Most photos don't do it justice, as when trees are in leaf the canopy cover makes it too dark for decent photos! In many places the graves are completely obscured by vegetation and so it can be treacherous underfoot. It's rightly now a wild place, even if the mix of trees is somewhat eclectic. There are also plenty of native herbs which have colonised. Also there is very little grass, just odd patches near the two gates and along the S boundary.

Jerry
Warin61 (2021-04-15 08:24:42+00:00): Ok ... 
I'll put it into OMH then. Could be a cool place to visit in hot weather.
MKnight (2016-06-14 11:33:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3773031572 ist Samstag geschlossen?
Eindeutigeres Tagging wäre in dem Falle: "Su-Th 10:00-24:00, Fr 10:00-02:00"
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2016-06-14 11:48:01+00:00): Nein, das sollte "täglich von 10 bis 24uhr, Fr, Sa bis 2 Uhr"  sein, beim Samstag fehlte also 10:00-24:00 ... ist behoben
MKnight (2016-06-14 12:48:50+00:00): Ich seh da keine Änderung, vergessen hochzuladen?
MKnight (2016-06-14 15:52:16+00:00): Eintrag ist zwar korrekt nun, Ich hab das trotzdem mal noch etwas lesbarer gestaltet.
efxribus (2015-10-05 10:05:28+00:00): Seisbach hinzugefügt (B´Nebenbach der Our)
canfe (2019-06-30 08:02:50+00:00): Ma il nome del bosco è davvero "Molliccio"??
Gh0stz0x (2019-07-02 15:14:14+00:00): A memoria, mi sembra di aver letto da qualche parte di questo "famoso" Bosco Molliccio. Se riesco a trovare il link con le foto dei segnali. P.S.:Magari mi sbaglio...
Jrachi (2021-05-11 08:01:55+00:00): "Biblioteca Comunale"?
Puoi fare di meglio!
Martj9 (2021-05-11 13:53:04+00:00): Non ho capito
Jrachi (2021-05-11 14:50:04+00:00): Intendevo solo che l'edificio contiene la biblioteca.
Il nome, se ne ha uno, è sicuramente un altro.
Io preferisco la prassi di mettere sul building le cose del building, mentre quello che contiene è un nodo al suo interno.
Martj9 (2021-05-12 07:42:41+00:00): Ah be' quello anche io. Ma è una modifica di cinque anni fa. Ho corretto in modo che spero ti sia gradito, se noti altre modifiche di cinque anni fa in cui tu "puoi fare di meglio" ti consiglio il graditissimo uso del tasto Modifica in alto a sinistra
Jrachi (2021-05-12 08:09:25+00:00): Ciao.
Mi accorgo di avere usato un tono "due dita troppo alto".
Forse è che sto facendo un corso OSM al CAI e tendo a salire sulla sedia a pontificare.
Tono cattedratico a  parte, ti chiedo ancora scusa per essere stato quanto meno indiscreto.
Una cosa che ho spiegato agli allievi (che sicuramente incontrerai) è di rispettare il lavori degli altri ma anche di controllare : 1) quando e 2) chi ed infine 3) ragionare bene sulla cosa.
Sai come si dice: "chi predica bene, razzola male"
Ivo
PlaneMad (2016-10-28 08:55:14+00:00): Hi, noticed that the Kecamatans have been tagged as place=city which may not be an appropriate tag as they don't indicate an urban area. Is there a more appropriate tag for them in Indonesia?
chippy (2015-10-05 11:18:25+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's good to see a new mapper in Leeds. I'm also in Leeds, and been mapping for a while.

Generally we don't change the name of things to add a note that it has changed. We just change the name (but you did want to note that there was a change, and that's good)

So in this example you would just change the name to FixIT Leeds. and add a note saying "previously Kaba PC Co-operative". If you get stuck doing that, just let me know in this discussion, or send a message to me privately. 

Now, I believe that Kaba PC has actually moved to Armley? I don't know if they still have the place on Burley Lodge Road. I walked past there the other day and it wasn't open, but the sign was still up.  Do you know if it's stil there but just changed name?
chippy (2015-10-05 11:21:40+00:00): Ahh I see in your other edit that you added their Armley shop. So we just need to know if this one in Burley is open or shut now.
~Jhellico (2015-10-06 06:03:22+00:00): Будь ласка, припиніть псувати мультиполігони!
canfe (2019-03-10 07:42:01+00:00): Il nome è in maiuscolo (Rocci??) e andrebbe corretto, ma sopratutto è un parco divertimenti, il che, stride.
GerdP (2015-10-24 07:54:06+00:00): please review my changes to the bunker
way 282754162:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34836228
See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:military%3Dbunker
sabas88 (2015-10-05 18:23:23+00:00): Mitico Paolo!
SomeoneElse (2015-10-11 14:11:19+00:00): Hello, Google Satellite can't be used as a source for OpenStreetMap. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for more information.
eastender (2015-10-11 18:18:21+00:00): It’s not a good idea to create buildings from satellite imagery in areas marked as landuse=construction, unless you are sure that the buildings are newly constructed buildings. Satellite imagery for construction sites typically shows buildings that are about to be demolished, or that have already been demolished. For example, the two buildings created with this changeset at the Canary Wharf (formerly Wood Wharf) construction site are incorrect re-creations of buildings that have already been demolished. I surveyed the Canary Wharf construction site this weekend and can confirm that the two buildings you re-created have definitely been demolished, and therefore shouldn’t appear on OSM.
Nakaner (2015-10-05 17:14:01+00:00): Ich habe noch ein paar Sachen korrigiert, die ich heute morgen beim Vorbeifahren gesehen habe. (Dass man da derzeit nicht durchfahren darf, ist bestimmt nur eine kurzzeitige Sperrung und daher nicht mappenswert).

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=34452249

Das junction/construction=roundabout habe ich entfernt, da es ja nicht als Kreisverkehr beschildert ist.
Hjart (2015-10-05 16:25:54+00:00): Hvorfor denne ændring? Mit bedste gæt er at denne bygning netop er en del af et landbrug (farm).
Hjart (2015-10-05 16:23:36+00:00): Hvorfor denne ændring? Bygningen er så vidt jeg forstår en del af skolen.
Руслан Хайруллин (2015-10-07 09:01:45+00:00): Исправил расположение улиц
lostmike (2015-10-07 12:32:50+00:00): Is the name this road really "Driveway"? Seems unlikely to me.
vmppsig76 (2015-10-05 13:51:48+00:00): error
vmppsig76 (2015-10-05 13:51:59+00:00): error
vmppsig76 (2015-10-05 13:52:12+00:00): error
vmppsig76 (2015-10-05 13:51:23+00:00): error
SomeoneElse (2015-10-07 20:02:39+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  Just noticed this edit down the road from me - it looks like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3773308357 is a duplicate of the already existing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/327148859/history .  There should only be one thing in OSM for each thing in the real world - see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element .  Also, you removed the "amenity=post_depot" tag.  Was that deliberate?  If this isn't an "amenity=post_depot", what actually is it?  Also I suspect that the two driveways connecting Interlink to Venture Crescent aren't actually called "Driveway".  If they're driveways that have no name, you don't need to make one up for OSM.  See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for more details.  I'd be very surprised if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373898970/history is a public road ("unclassified"), given that the roads connecting to it don't look like unclassified roads from Wimsey Way.
Apologies if any of this is confusing - any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2015-10-23 00:04:29+00:00): For info, I've now removed the "Driveway" names, removed the duplicate node, and re-added the "amenity=post_depot" tag back.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34812248 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34812259
GerdP (2015-10-16 07:21:34+00:00): please review:
way 123158137 (name=Якорный проспект) 
has now invalid tag
highway=residential;tertiary
and disappeared from the map
dvdhoven (2016-01-31 07:02:35+00:00): Een aantal wegen hadden allemaal de naam Wapserouwerweg gekregen. Vermoedelijk door kopiëren.
Ik heb de namen aan de hand van de wijzigingshistorie weer terug gezet naar de situatie van voor deze wijzigingsset.
Betrof Butenweg, Oosterbutenweg, Wapserauwen, Heuringsweg, Baeteweg
DTeelde (2016-02-01 10:41:59+00:00): Excuses; waar gehakt worden vallen spaanders, maar liever niet te veel. Ctrl+R kan gemakkelijk zijn.
Bedankt voor het herstelwerk.
Gr. Dirk
user_599436 (2015-10-06 02:21:47+00:00): I have twice removed a duplicate entry for M&T Bank added by you. Are you having trouble finding it in your software?

It is already mapped here:https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3454452313
wheelerda (2015-10-06 17:50:37+00:00): Sorry. I just found it. It is categorized as an Amenity and so shows in the editing view as a dot. I didn't expect the dot to be a Bank (especially since it was next to larger icons for a street lamp and a wastebasket! I'll try to be more careful. 

...dan
user_599436 (2015-10-06 18:52:18+00:00): Opening up the area in iD, I can see what you mean. That software could use some improvement.

I've added many of the shops on Albany Street and tried to map them as close as possible to their actual locations. The data can get a bit dense in places.

You've added a lot of detail, which is great! There are a few notes I've made on some of your changesets on how to improve some of the features you've mapped. I wasn't sure if you were getting notified of them, but now I see you are.

These comments make it easier to communicate, which is helpful since OSM is attracting more editors. Feel free to send a message or comment in the future.
wheelerda (2015-10-07 16:28:04+00:00): And it isn't the Amenity tag which is the issue, as I quickly assumed. I now see that the placement is the issue - when you place an object on an area boundary it is displayed as a dot in the editor. Not so nice. 
...dan
SimonPoole (2015-10-06 18:36:08+00:00): Dear natino, it seems as if you deleted a number of objects in this changeset that exist in reality. Can you explain your edits?
Peda (2015-11-07 00:26:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35140223 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits circumventing a DWG block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834)
Peda (2015-11-07 00:33:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35140248 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits circumventing a DWG block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834)
Peda (2015-11-07 00:45:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35140530 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits circumventing a DWG block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834)
Peda (2015-11-07 00:33:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35140248 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits circumventing a DWG block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834)
Peda (2015-11-07 00:26:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35140223 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits circumventing a DWG block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834)
Peda (2015-11-07 00:33:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35140248 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits circumventing a DWG block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834)
Peda (2015-11-07 00:45:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35140530 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits circumventing a DWG block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834)
Peda (2015-11-07 00:26:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35140223 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits circumventing a DWG block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834)
Peda (2015-11-07 00:33:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35140248 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits circumventing a DWG block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834)
Peda (2015-11-07 00:45:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35140530 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits circumventing a DWG block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834)
Peda (2015-11-07 00:33:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35140248 where the changeset comment is: reverted edits circumventing a DWG block (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/834)
Руслан Хайруллин (2015-10-07 08:59:45+00:00): Исправил расположение улиц
GerdP (2017-09-24 07:24:34+00:00): Hi!
I am looking at ways with the rarely used tag highway=access_ramp.
I assume this is a footway usable for wheelchairs (and maybe also for delivery) 
?
Why didn't you use highway=footway + wheelchair=yes ?
Tararan (2017-09-24 07:35:36+00:00): I guess you are talking about the clinic's ramp that looks like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:SSF_Main_Library_wheelchair_ramp_1.JPG
GerdP (2017-09-24 07:39:12+00:00): Sorry, forgot the link:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373911488
Tararan (2017-09-24 07:39:52+00:00): I haven't edited OSM for years, please don't ask me about properties and keys.
Tararan (2017-09-24 07:41:25+00:00): It may also look much like the picture in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Access_Ramp : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Accessramp.jpg
GerdP (2017-09-24 07:43:51+00:00): Ah, thanks for the last link.
Tararan (2017-09-24 07:46:42+00:00): Photos of the ramp: https://yandex.ru/images/search?text=%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0%20180
literan (2015-10-05 21:49:31+00:00): правильный тег для беседки - building=gazebo. Shelter - это убежище в горах. Тег name - только для имен собственных!
Mars-Curaçao (2015-12-10 05:13:21+00:00): WHAT are you a fucking asshole because off deleting my data everywhere!! My navigation app does not know the road between Grote Berg and Tera Cora anymore because you and your friends fucked with the map!! Go and play somewhere else!!!!!
SomeoneElse (2015-12-10 19:42:31+00:00): @Mars-Curaçao - calling someone a "fucking asshole" in changeset discussion comments is _not_ OK (and neither is "repaired the shit from foreigners" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35760694 ). Can you identify the specific change that has caused your navigation app to not know the road between Grote Berg and Tera Cora?  If so, explain the problem, what has likely gone wrong, and how to fix it.   OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project; we have to work together if we want to create the best map.  Swearing at people is extremely unlikely to achieve the desired result.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse), on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
canfe (2020-03-18 10:42:38+00:00): In che senso Gay?
La villa ha quel nome??
literan (2015-10-05 21:22:12+00:00): Это не монументы. Читайте вики, что обозначается этим тегом. Правку откатываю.
vichada (2015-10-05 17:57:30+00:00): Sorry, again. Wrong comment. It should be:
#coquimbo #hot-project-1198
and source was only the imagery provided by Bing.
aseerel4c26 (2015-10-07 23:50:07+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34479372
Hashim Qataberi (2015-10-05 18:15:47+00:00): Changing road information
Nakaner (2015-10-05 18:37:46+00:00): Siehe dazu auch die Quellenangaben in den Kommentaren von Änderungssatz 34429046 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34429046
Kakaner (2015-10-05 20:37:00+00:00): Du bist so gut. Ich bin stolz auf dich.
Mars-Curaçao (2015-12-05 12:34:07+00:00): Talmastraat ???
Hjart (2015-10-05 18:46:03+00:00): Der var allerede markeret en cykelfanger på Møllevejen ved Munkebo, så jeg tillader mig at slette denne her igen. Bemærk desuden at cykelfangere og lignende skal placeres på selve vejen, fremfor ved siden af for at have nogen effekt på diverse navigationsprogrammer.
Hjart (2015-10-05 18:47:00+00:00): Iøvrigt: velkommen som bidragsyder på vores projekt.
aseerel4c26 (2015-10-07 23:50:09+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34479372
EugenyN (2015-10-10 06:44:28+00:00): Привет!

Улицы - это всегда highway=residential, независимо от покрытия и качества. Покрытие и качество указываются через surface и smoothness
Nakaner (2015-10-11 08:29:49+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34564358
flohoff (2015-10-06 06:47:40+00:00): Hi,
ich habe gesehen das du in OWL jede menge Bahnhöfe angefasst hast. Hier hast du als category "7" gesetzt die es laut Wiki gar nicht gibt:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahnhofskategorie

Wenn das so richtig ist wäre es super wenn du das Wiki anpassen würdest.

Und das Dokument der Deutschen Bahn ist Urheberrechtlich für uns Nutzbar?

Flo
flohoff (2015-10-06 06:50:30+00:00): Ah - entschuldige - in dem Wiki artikel fehlt die Kategorie in der Tabelle oben - in der Beschreibung unten findet sich was.
Geogast (2015-10-09 13:37:00+00:00): Hallo! Die Erlaubnis findet sich hier: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Kommunikation/DBSuSAG
VG!
Geogast (2015-10-09 13:37:34+00:00): Eines der wenigen Punkte, wo die DB mal Daten freigibt...
opendcc (2019-07-13 17:22:23+00:00): Die Hausnummer 18 ist doppelt, was stimmt?
Nakaner (2015-10-11 08:28:05+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34564297
Maarten Deen (2015-10-07 07:37:47+00:00): Can you please stop adding "tracks=2" to railway tracks that are already mapped to represent one track per physical track? You have been asked multiple times to stop that behaviour. Tracks= indicates how many physical tracks there are per mapped way. If there are two adjacent ways in OSM and two tracks on the ground, tracks=2 is wrong.

Example: way 223324839
Nakaner (2015-10-07 08:28:33+00:00): Saying it short, but clear: If you continue adding tracks=2 where it is wrong, I will ask DWG to block your account.

See also https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-October/074453.html
marczoutendijk (2015-10-07 19:04:48+00:00): Beste WjtW,
Zou je willen reageren op alle zaken waarbij je klaarblijkelijk onjuiste tags aan het invoeren bent? Of je kunt geen engels lezen, of het kan je niets schelen. Als dat laatste het geval is ben je verkeerd bezig en wordt je account binnenkort geblokkeerd.
Ik raad je aan om te reageren op de beschuldigingen op de mailinglist. Zie de reactie van Nakaner.
Nakaner (2015-10-11 08:21:45+00:00): This changeset has been fully reverted. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34564244
PlaneMad (2015-10-06 06:05:21+00:00): Hey Anil, so good to see you editing here. Just gave Porabandar a facelift a week ago.
Sanniu (2017-01-30 11:51:52+00:00): The way with no tags, should it be road? Also it not connected to road network, so not-navigatable.
zstadler (2017-03-27 13:19:58+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373980740
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 13:45:37+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64405271
Zverik (2016-01-08 09:30:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 36440838 where the changeset comment is:
Bonix-Mapper (2016-11-07 15:45:15+00:00): Caminho,

Vou remover esta restrição. O roteamento veicular não é direcionado para o caminho de bicicletas. Assim sendo, não é necessário criar este tipo de restrição.
Glassman (2015-10-05 23:31:47+00:00): nice!
glglgl (2015-10-05 21:16:48+00:00): Leider vergessen, changesets zu schließen, dadurch wurden mehrere daraus.
* Ortsschilder
* Haltestellen
* Wegekreuze
* maxspeed
* Landesstraßenrelationen
Glassman (2015-10-05 23:30:51+00:00): You might want to draw the building outline and name it and give it a suitable tag, such as shop=electric
geri-oc (2017-01-12 18:27:36+00:00): Die Anzeige von File:* funktioniert nicht im Internet. Günstiger ist der Bildlink, wie in der vorigen Version. Habe es geändert - Gruß Gerd.
Geogast (2015-10-05 21:34:18+00:00): correct source: http://www.deutschebahn.com/file/de/2201914/NrI-UHqK9fKym_RWugjkm5znKvg/8136558/data/bahnhofskategorieliste_2015.pdf
EinKonstanzer (2016-08-06 15:32:05+00:00): Weswegen eine Parkplatzrelation? Relation dienen ja dazu Dinge die irgendwie zusammen gehören zusammen zu fassen. Beides sind Parkplätze und nichts weiter.
Weasel-Wiesel (2016-08-07 17:40:50+00:00): You could argue that they are both part of one and the same car park, but feel free to delete the relation.
Wolle DD (2015-10-07 14:05:29+00:00): Hier wurde leider ungenau gearbeitet und die Arbeit nicht kontrolliert: Die Öffnungen im Bahnsteig müssen vom MP des Bahnsteigs 3 sein - und nicht von dem der Bahnsteige 11 und 12.
Siehe: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3578209
Bitte ändern!
Nakaner (2016-12-12 09:55:26+00:00): Hallo sperlingskauz,

warum hast Du denn die Alb von waterway=river auf waterway=stream umgetaggt? Kannst Du da ohne Hilfsmittel darüberspringen? Wenn ja, bitte ich am Freitagnachmittag um 16 Uhr um eine Demonstration deiner Fähigkeit in Ettlingen an der Stadtbahnhaltestelle Wasen. Das will ich sehen. :-)

Viele Grüße

Michael
sperlingskauz (2016-12-13 07:06:47+00:00): Hallo Michael,

über einen Wassergraben kann man i.d.R. springen, durch einen größeren Bach kann man waten. Dann hat man zwar hinterher nasse Füße bis evt zur Hüfte hoch, aber man kann ohne Hilfsmittel queren. Bei einem Fluß geht das nicht. 
So ist beim Orientierungslauf die Regelung für das Kartieren. 
Ich schau mir die Alb an dieser Stelle nochmals diesbezüglich an. 

Viele Grüße, 
Uta
Nakaner (2016-12-13 10:04:56+00:00): Hallo Uta,

die Orientierungslauf-Definition eines Flusses/Bachs war mir bislang nicht bekannt, aber bei OSM ist ein Bach als "man kann darüber springen" definiert. Siehe dazu die Wiki-Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:waterway%3Dstream (die Englische erklärt es noch ausführlicher).

Du kannst ja width=* an der Alb ergänzen. Von Mapnik (Software) gerenderte Karten können das nicht auswerten, weil Mapnik keine Linienstärken anhand bestimmter Tags dynamisch anpassen kann, aber andere Datennutzer freuen sich über solche Informationen.

Es wäre schön, wenn du waterway=* ab der Alb wieder ändern könntest. Derzeit sieht das Rendering nämlich etwas armselig aus, wenn man eine kleinmaßstäbliche Karte rendert, die nur Flüsse, Relief und Schummerung enthält. Da hat die Alb von Busenbach bis Rüppurr nämlich eine Lücke. :-/

Flussbreiten kann man übrigens auch aus Luftbildern messen (geht mit JOSM).

Viele Grüße

Michael
sperlingskauz (2016-12-17 22:58:09+00:00): cleanup done.
Grant Humphries (2016-11-11 01:08:31+00:00): Hi Peter,

Having way #124103906 named "Northeast 7th Avenue" is causing a problem with our trip planner because that doubles as the sidewalk for NE Holladay St. and if the person starts there and turns on the nearby street that is actually named 7th the street doesn't change names and so trip planner doesn't provide a turn direction where it should.

It looks like your trying to comply with the wiki defined public transport scheme, but are you ok with that segment having the primary name of "Northeast Holladay Street" or "Northeast 7th Avenue MAX Station"?   The latter is the name TriMet uses for it.

If you're steadfast that you tagged this properly we could probably request some changes to the trip planner's code, but wanted to get your take.
Peter Dobratz (2016-11-11 06:51:03+00:00): I agree that the sidewalk should be named the same as the road that it parallels: "Northeast Holladay Street".

Would it make sense to not have the platform and the sidewalk be the same Way object?  What if we made the 2 parallel Ways with the platform being closer to the tracks and the sidewalk being closer building?

I'm generally not in favor of appending "MAX Station" to the name of every MAX station.  Those words are of course omitted in maps like this:
http://trimet.org/maps/img/railsystem.png