piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
freebeer (2018-01-28 22:34:02+00:00): Hi,
About that deletion - my suggestion is that even if demolished, the outline of the building be left in the OpenStreetMap data for now.
The grounds being, the area is lacking many buildings, and imageries used to add things are years out of date, so that it's possible someone else will come in and add many buildings, including the no-longer-present-school outline.
If something is present in the map data, but prefixed with an appropriate lifecycle prefix, then the mapper will see that and ideally not re-add the building from an obsolete source.
thanks...
loganmikel (2018-01-28 22:45:25+00:00): Could we then: Keep the building, but remove the name/school grounds? The problem at the moment is they combined two schools (rebuilding one), and renamed it Sterling Elementary. Because the new (combined) school is at a different location, this could cause confusion if the name is kept.
freebeer (2018-01-29 00:18:37+00:00): Sure, the grounds and the name are deleted already.
Should I restore the deleted building for you?  It's easy if one knows what to do.  The learning may not be so trivial.
Then you can edit it to adjust as needed.
(Also you wrote it's slated for demolition, which I take it means it still stands, and as a generic non-school building will have a perfect place in OSM, at least, until the wrecking ball is delivered...)
(I will assume yes, so if I guessed wrong, you can delete it again ;-)
loganmikel (2018-01-29 00:22:51+00:00): Yeah, if you could restore it it would be greatly appreciated. Ive been trying to figure it out (how to restore it) for a while now (first day), and after that I can edit it to adjust the tag as needed
freebeer (2018-01-29 00:33:18+00:00): If I got the right one, it's back awaiting demolition now, so it's all yours
(dons hardhat)
loganmikel (2018-01-29 00:46:34+00:00): That's the one! Thank you!
andygol (2018-02-04 19:35:55+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55841434
nblackburn (2018-01-28 21:14:58+00:00): https://www.lancaster.gov.uk/news-and-events/greyhound-bridge-closure-29-01-18-04-08-18
avm (2018-01-28 21:56:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 55842439 where the changeset comment is: Vandalismo - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Vandalismo
iandees (2018-01-28 21:29:44+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55841523
tomhukins (2018-02-11 17:16:43+00:00): Hi, thank you for helping to improve the map. Your change adds a node for the trampoline park at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5368880403 inside the Safestore building that already existed at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317442796 - do both exist or should the trampoline park replace Safestore?
sanogra (2018-02-11 21:30:48+00:00): Hi,

Safestore is still there and the trampoline park is actually a seperate building to the rear of safestore (the map incorrectly shows a single building where there should be 2)
tomhukins (2018-03-04 12:08:59+00:00): Thank you for the explanation.  I've left a note at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1316843 to encourage someone to fix this mistake.
evod (2018-01-29 18:07:27+00:00): Hey, ich finds großartig, dass sich noch jemand darum kümmert, dass die Adressen (in Wien) mal vollständig werden - aber bitte lass die Qualität nicht außer acht. Ich hab z.B. vor wenigen tagen in der Weißenwolffgasse Adressen auf Gebäude gemappt, dort ist jetzt alles doppelt. Genauso z.B. in der Anton-Bosch-Gasse.
user_1470980 (2018-01-31 12:04:59+00:00): Hallo evod, den Wikipedia Regeln entsprechend darf es keine doppelten Adressen geben. Mir ist dies bewusst, finde aber dass es sinnvoll ist 

dass wir 

in Wien möglichst schnell sämtliche noch fehlende Adressen ergänzen. Das Entfernen doppelter Adressen lässt sich anschließend mittels einer einfachen Overpass Abfrage, und Bulk Edit in wenigen Arbeitsschritten für ganz Wien erledigen.

Vielleicht unterstützt Du die Adress- Ergänzung. Ich empfehle dazu  das JOSM Plugin AustriaAdressHelper. 

Sehr freundliche Grüße
Johann
evod (2018-02-01 06:43:41+00:00): Ich bin ganz und gar nicht für das Bulk-Löschen von Adressen, sondern für das Importieren mit Augenmaß. Denn was wird später bulk gelöscht? Dass du in ganzen Grätzln die schon gemappt sind doppelt mappst finde ich nicht sinnvoll. In Gegenden wo noch (fast) nichts war durchaus.
user_1470980 (2018-02-01 13:10:50+00:00): Ich finde Bulk löschen auch eher problematisch, und schlage daher einen zweiten manuellen Arbeitsgang zum konsolidieren der Adressen vor.

Ich finde aktuell muss für uns Priorität haben, den Adressbestand in Wien von aktuell 40% auf 100% zu heben. Für einen kurzen Zeitraum sind dafür eventuell  doppelte Adressen in Kauf, denn nur so sieht man ob der BEV Adresspunkt bereits belegt oder noch leer ist.

Mein Vorschlag, Bitte um Unterstützung in der Adressergänzung.
user_1470980 (2018-02-12 01:37:10+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=684611#p684611
skyper (2021-05-11 14:06:12+00:00): Hallo nugloor

Zur Info:
Abbiegeeinschränkungen-Relationen mit identischem `from` und `to` Wegen sind ungültig und unnötig. Vorallem no_u_turn an jeder Kreuzung bringt nichts.

Werde folgende Relationen löschen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7945627
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7945628

Grüße skyper
skyper (2021-05-11 14:10:54+00:00): Sind noch einige mehr an dieser Kreuzung.
eggie (2018-01-29 14:48:00+00:00): Hi Steelbas..  hint...  It's better to ignore the app AddCycleway. Not well suited for the Dutch infrastructure.
Hjart (2018-01-29 07:51:53+00:00): Er du sikker på at der er en fontæne midt i det der hus?
andygol (2018-02-04 19:35:27+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55841942
johsin18 (2018-06-20 07:06:12+00:00): I have corrected the probably accidental tagging of Casinostrasse from "ford=yes" to "foot=yes" .
viloan (2018-01-28 22:00:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
andygol (2018-02-04 19:34:39+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55842645
MarkusHD (2018-03-28 02:35:37+00:00): Many buildings have been added duplicated here. I noticed it on the East Hyde Park Backpackers: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556580512 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556579402
Maybe each element in this changeset is affected?
John Bek (2018-03-28 05:38:09+00:00): That's weird as I know I would have only added one, not two. I guess the older of the two can be deleted?
MarkusHD (2018-03-28 05:44:35+00:00): There is no one older than the other because they are both version 1 created in this changeset. But yes, one of each duplicated elements can be removed. Have a look at the whole change, at least the buildings in the neighbourhood of the hostel are duplicated as well.

This might be a problem with reloading before uploading or so. I think I can remember such a problem happened to myself some time ago or having seen it already somewhere else.
John Bek (2018-03-28 07:17:25+00:00): I just went through and deleted a heap of duplicates, although I lost track and may have missed some. So in future perhaps I need to save and upload more frequently rather than let it amount to too many additions and changes
DD1GJ (2018-01-29 00:48:12+00:00): Revert 55843567 55843375 55843061 , Vandalism
andygol (2018-02-04 19:34:23+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55843090
DD1GJ (2018-01-29 00:03:56+00:00): Revert 55843127 55842851, Pokémon-Vandalismus

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/
Niantic23Bot (2018-01-29 17:35:20+00:00): Sorry, wir können deiner Nachricht nicht folgen! Bitte sei konzentriert und schreibe deine Nachricht noch einmal in ganzen Sätzen!
DD1GJ (2018-01-29 19:06:47+00:00): Da die Änderungen dieses Accounts nicht der Qualität und Seriosität des Projektes entsprachen, wurden sie komplett rückgängig gemacht. Die von vorhin übrigens auch.
literan (2018-01-29 12:40:20+00:00): Здравствуйте! ставить адреску на POI не нужно, это излишняя информация. Но если уж вы это делаете - ставьте ее корректно (чтобы не запутывать пользователей OSM), чтобы она соответствовала адреске на доме. Кривую адреску вычищу. Также вычищу лишнее из name (всякие deli coffee shop - тег name только для имени собственного, см. вики)
JJIglesias (2018-01-29 01:46:12+00:00): De que es esta tienda o que vende? 
//
Normalmente Source NO es el nombre de la persona que agrego el dato, mas si fue Levantamiento de campo o fuente oficial o algo asi; 
//
El nombre propio va Capitalizado osea seria : El Cambita
//
Gracias por editar #OSM_BO
DD1GJ (2018-01-29 00:28:13+00:00): Revert 55843239 55843160 , Pokémon-Vandalismus.

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/

Was Du hier machst, ist nicht lustig. Das Internet ist kein rechtsfreier Raum; in Deutschland gibt es Gesetze gegen Computer-Vandalismus. Wenn Du weiterhin absichtlich falsche Daten in OSM einträgst, kann eines Tages die Polizei bei Dir (oder Deinen Eltern) vorm Haus stehen und die Computer einsammeln. Bitte überlege Dir ernsthaft, ob so ein paar Pokemons den Stress wert sind.
opendcc (2018-01-29 07:17:31+00:00): Hallo Tim,

wenn Du gerne draußen bist und 'reale' Punkte einsammeln willst: in Tann gibt es viele Häuser, wo die Hausnummer noch fehlt. Hingehen, Nummer nachsehen und eintragen - da würden wir uns freuen! Und wir helfen auch gerne, wenn Du noch unsicher bist, wie das richtig geht.

Servus Wolfgang
DD1GJ (2018-01-29 00:48:28+00:00): Revert 55843567 55843375 55843061 , Vandalism
redrace (2018-01-31 15:43:14+00:00): Huhu
Willkommen bei OSM! Danke, dass Du bereit bist hier mit zumachen!
Hast Du dir die von dir geänderten Wege selber angesehen! Ein Teil davon war mit einer Breite von 2 Metern eingetragen. Das ist ausreichend Beit für ein Auto! Auf der Autobahn sind manche Spuren auch nur 2 Meter oder 2,1 Meter breit!
Diese Wege in Footway umzutaggen ist dann so nicht richtig!
Den es wird dort nicht überall ein Schild stehen!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
Also bitte überdenke und überarbeite deine Eintragungen nochmal!
Schöne Grüße
andygol (2018-02-04 19:33:58+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55843471
Glassman (2018-01-28 23:15:30+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55843493
DD1GJ (2018-01-29 00:48:45+00:00): Revert 55843567 55843375 55843061 , Vandalism
BeKri (2018-01-29 01:14:04+00:00): Servus heilbron,
Du bist wirklich lang genug dabei,
aber was soll
opening_hours= "Turnhalle!" und
opening_hours="ist eine Turnhalle!"
ich kann es auch in der history nicht nachvollziehen.
Wenn Du PM hast wäre es nett wenn Du uns als note irgendwie einen Hinweis auf Deine eher unüblichen Einträge für
opening_hours
hinterlassen würdest .. Danke ;-=
heilbron (2018-01-29 20:49:14+00:00): Das ist ein leider schief gegangener Eintrag aus Verwendung der App "StreetComplete", die sozusagen um den Nachtrag fehlender Daten an POI's erbettelt, wenn man in der Nähe entsprechender Orte ist. Sorry!
Habe beide Einträge korrigiert (gelöscht).
andygol (2018-02-04 19:33:16+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55843651
tux67 (2018-01-29 14:47:51+00:00): Hi Loraus,

baulich nicht gerennte Radwege werden nicht als separate Spur gemappt. Du markierst den Teil der vorhandenen Strasse, der einen Radweg hat (notfalls musst du die Linie segmentieren) und fügst ein cycleway:right=lane (oder left, je nacht Strassenrichtung) hinzu.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:cycleway%3Dlane

iD, der Editor den du nutzt bietet dir diese Option bereits an, wenn du die Wilhelm-Strater Strasse markierst.

Gruß
Stephan
mueschel (2018-01-31 11:34:50+00:00): Hi,
could you check the name tag on this lake?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556586965

Thanks, Jan
Wulfmorn (2018-02-05 15:36:14+00:00): Oops, thanks. I have fixed it.
andygol (2018-02-04 19:32:56+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55843668
andygol (2018-02-04 19:32:42+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55843747
DD1GJ (2018-01-29 06:55:57+00:00): Revert 55844076 55844020, Pokémon-Schrott
Digne (2018-01-29 11:58:07+00:00): Hallo Sander de Goede,

Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
mueschel (2018-02-03 11:59:03+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node? This cliff is placed in the middle of the sea.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5369134426

Thanks, Jan
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-30 11:18:51+00:00): A review was requested, and for the record, I did this (& the other) on the other changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55844257
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-30 11:18:28+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM! You asked for a review on this edit (and the previous one https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55844231 ), so here it is.

Thanks for adding this, and the house number. We can't get addresses from the aerial imagery, so we need someone local to add them. Thanks for this. 👍

*buuuuut* you added your back garden  as `leisure=park`, that's mostly for actual parks maintained by the council and all that. Adding a name of "back garden" is wrong as well, since the name should be the sort of thing that would be on a sign, not just a description. It's OK if something doesn't have a name, lots of things in the real world don't have a sign with the name.

You can also use the 'square' feature to make a building have right angles, which can make buildings more accurate.
user_5359 (2018-02-04 12:09:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I can't see any lake on the aerial images. Could it be a private swimming pool?
freebeer (2018-02-06 09:42:12+00:00): A swimming pool would almost certainly be in the back yard, not in full view of the road and passing pedestrians.
This area is a front yard with more tree cover than others nearby, so it could be a small landscape garden with an artificial lily pond, if it exists, it is difficult to say.
However, without any of the nearby buildings being marked, or any housenumbers, it looks a strange and lonely addition, rather than forming part of an ensemble.
Proof of this would have to be a ground-level photo of the front lawnyard.
.
That said, I see some strange looking turning circles nearby, covering a wide area, that appear to be mapped as traffic signals in error.
Noviandrin (2018-02-06 12:02:58+00:00): Or...it could be a pond that has been there for a long time that aerial imagery has always had trouble spotting. It is one of many reasons why a person on the ground is going to have better knowledge of any given area than someone just looking at images taken from afar.  For example, looking at that imagery you would swear there is a huge chair sitting outside of a store just a ways down the road, but they removed that chair years ago.
ForstEK (2018-12-11 07:48:15+00:00): Hi, Hendrikklaas! Please see wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/556599652 - for these objects you shouldn't use tag "covered=yes", so there are nothing on top above them . All oil tanks have a roof, this is default constructive. Covered=yes is used in other cases.
Hendrikklaas (2018-12-11 19:39:49+00:00): Hi ForstEK,
I am sorry to disagree with you, there are silo's without a roof, so covered is IMHO the right tag. There is no tag for uncovered is not it ?
ForstEK (2018-12-11 20:34:17+00:00): I wrote about oil tanks but no about silos. If you mean oil tanks with stable roof and with floating roof you should use other tag (for exapmle. like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings#Roof), because the tag "covered=yes" is for cases, where you need to mark two vertical layer in the one place on the map. Please read the wiki article with attention: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered. In these and many other tanks on top and below is nothing - only one layer. For underground tanks we use tag man_made=reservoir_covered (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=reservoir_covered). But due to your logic you should write tag "covered=yes" on every building which has a roof, shouldn't you?
SteMue (2018-02-05 16:47:41+00:00): Leider ist das Symbol aufgrund eines Verstoßes gegen das OSM-Wiki wieder unsichtbar. Multipolygons sind nicht zulässig, POI's sind als Punkt zu vermarken.
4b696d (2018-02-05 18:37:38+00:00): Das stimmt ja mal hinten und vorne nicht.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Points_of_interest#POIs_in_OpenStreetMap
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:One_feature,_one_OSM_element
SteMue (2018-02-06 21:23:41+00:00): Nur das es leider nicht funktioniert, alles super!
4b696d (2018-02-06 21:24:42+00:00): Was bitte soll nicht funktionieren?
SteMue (2018-02-07 18:19:06+00:00): Außer in großer Entfernung wird der POI nicht angezeigt, weil er falsch gemappt würde.
4b696d (2018-02-07 18:31:43+00:00): Neuling bei OSM aber schon wissen, was alles falsch ist? Das sind immer die, die am meisten Spaß machen.
Ich wiederhole mich noch einmal. Hier ist alles richtig, dass das Symbol nicht angezeigt wird, ich gehe mal davon aus, dass Carto gemeint ist, ist definitiv nicht dem Mapping geschuldet.
SteMue (2018-02-08 17:07:16+00:00): Ich kann mich leider nur wiederholen, Operation gelungen, Patient tot. Mach weiter so, ich werde Dich nie wieder behelligen.
Gerade Leute mit einer solchen Haltung sorgen dafür, das OSM zu einen Forum kleiner "Könige" geworden ist. Jeder macht immer alles richtig, obwohl das Ergebnis nicht zufriedenstellend ist.
Mit dem Mapping, wie Du es erzeugt hast, erfolgt die Anfahrt zum Flughafen Schönefeld über den Flughafen BER, was defacto nicht zielführend ist, aber Du hast ja alles richtig gemacht. Geht es um den Selbstzweck einer Karte oder um eine gebrauchstaugliche Karte?
VlG Stefan
4b696d (2018-02-08 18:09:50+00:00): Für sowas habe jetzt leider keine Zeit. Wende dich bitte an eine Mailing-Liste oder ans Forum um da mal Kund zu tun, dass 628 (77%) der Flughäfen in Deutschland falsch eingezeichnet sind.
https://lists.openstreetmap.de/mailman/listinfo/berlin
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
SteMue (2018-02-08 18:11:38+00:00): ...Beim Flughafen Tegel diktiert das Routing, in Schönefeld, sind es leider 15km Umweg ;-)
SteMue (2018-02-08 18:12:09+00:00): ...funktioniert...
loganmikel (2018-01-29 00:12:08+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55844917
trigpoint (2018-01-29 18:49:23+00:00): Hi, what is the source of these edits?

Also the name suggests a record shop, however you continue to mistag and in this case have used electronics.

Cheers Phil
loganmikel (2018-01-29 01:22:59+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55844939
viloan (2018-01-29 00:16:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
abakus_uploader (2018-01-29 23:32:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!