piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jptolosa (2020-05-15 14:35:10+00:00): Gracias por considerar lo que dije y por la información que desconocía. Las conexiones que hiciste hacia el este con V Centenario me parece que está super bien.

Sin embargo, el problema sería para alguien que viene desde el sur por Marga Marga y quiere seguir hacia el oeste por Los Carrera, siempre ha estado ausente la continuidad de ese highway=primary (sólo está la conexión para tomar hacia al este). Los usuarios tienden a elevar la categoría de Blanco Encalada porque a primera vista parece la opción más óptima a tomar, pero desconociendo lo que comentas.

Mirando el mapa las únicas opciones serían Blanco Encalada o Esmeralda para completar esa conexión faltante y alguna de esas debiera ser primary, o por último secondary.

Ahora también la clasificación de un camino depende del tráfico y la presencia de lugares importantes, si es una calle muy transitada aunque sea lenta debiera tener una clasificación importante, pero idealmente menor que aquella calle que te ofrezca un tránsito más expedito en comparativa. Fue ese el motivo por el que le puse secondary. Pero como tu eres de allá sabes mejor esos detalles más finos.
jptolosa (2020-05-15 14:35:36+00:00): Este es un parrafo importante de la wiki: Within larger urban settlements such as large towns or cities, tertiary roads link local centres of activity such as shops, schools, or suburbs. Use only for roads with low to moderate traffic. For the quietest sort of linking, non-residential road consider using highway=unclassified instead. For busier through routes and main roads use highway=secondary or greater.
jptolosa (2020-05-15 14:36:57+00:00): Otro detalle sería que a veces aparecen calles cortas sin salida etiquetadas como tertary o superior, las cuales solo pueden ser residential. Y siempre van a llegar usuarios de otras partes a corregir esos detalles.
cserpell (2020-05-15 14:41:48+00:00): Según ese párrafo, podemos dejar entonces el final de Marga Marga y Blanco como secondary. Como dices, si no la otra opción manteniéndose en carreteras primary, sería tomar esas calles chicas, luego la "Variante Camino Troncal" y finalmente Remón Freire hacia el poniente, una vuelta demasiado larga.
cserpell (2020-05-15 14:44:17+00:00): Después de mi último comentario, probablemente la gente que define los sentidos de las calles debe verlo así, hay dos calles hacia el oriente abajo (Los Carrera / Covadonga para vehículos particulares) y dos calles hacia el Poniente arriba (Ramón Freire y Baquedano para vehículos particulares), como circundando. Pero no hay por qué seguir esas ideas, este mapa lo hacemos nosotros =).
jptolosa (2020-05-15 15:02:36+00:00): Buena, me parece bien Blanco con el tramo final de Marga Marga como secondary. Sin embargo, a mi parecer la calle Esmeralda se ve como una opción equivalente a Encalada como solución óptima para viajar hacia el poniente desde Marga Marga. No sé qué calle considerarías la más óptima a tomar suponiendo que eres un viajero que viene desde el sur por la ruta F-50 y quieres llegar a Viña por Camino Troncal, esa es la razón por la que a veces a algún usuario se le ocurre etiquetar un primary adicional. Sin embargo usar secondary me parece una solución aceptable también para completar la conexión. Puede ser Esmeralda como secondary también tal vez hasta Cumming o sino Bulnes (y la cuadra que falta para conectar a Carrera), o al menos Esmeralda debiera ser tertiary por ser buena opción de circulación hacia el poniente. No sé qué opinas al respecto.
cserpell (2020-05-15 15:07:15+00:00): En ese caso prefiero dejar como secondary Blanco y Marga Marga. Cuando terminen la remodelación de calles (están instalando algunos semáforos adicionales), habrá que reevaluar la situación.
jptolosa (2020-05-15 15:14:31+00:00): Claro, y Esmeralda como tertiary entonces? por ser un calle céntrica y una alternativa de menor grado respecto a Blanco. Residential parece ser muy bajo.
yves klein (2021-11-18 19:01:14+00:00): Eine Wiesenmitte wie tausend andere. https://de.share-your-photo.com/acff08814c Was qualifiziert sie, außer dem stabilen Kanaldeckel, zu einem Aussichtspunkt?
andrewwiseman (2021-05-14 22:06:03+00:00): Thanks for mapping! Make sure to tag these are buildings, and note when you get any error messages. These are just empty shapes currently
mf8s003j (2020-05-13 22:12:36+00:00): In way #803488006, the lane:turns and turn:lanes keys are mixed up. They've been fixed in changeset #85166298
GinaroZ (2020-05-15 12:34:01+00:00): What made you change some of these roads to tracks? e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11799370
Pawcio (2020-05-15 12:58:05+00:00): Because they are unpaved what is the most important for road users.
user_5359 (2021-12-27 17:34:17+00:00): Hello! Please check the relgion value buddisth1 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803489327. Did you mean buddisth?
Britzz (2020-05-14 21:11:33+00:00): Bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap.
Vous avez "souhaité que quelqu'un vérifie vos modifications" : c'est OK

Pour bien démarrer : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
N'hésitez pas à poser des questions à la suite de ce commentaires ou rejoindre les autres canaux de discussion (cf. lien supra).
Bonne poursuite, prenez plaisir à contribuer à OSM !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85165985
gendy54 (2020-05-24 16:15:58+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour l'ajout de la caserne.
La caserne a déjà été cartographiée sur l'emprise du terrain. Il est donc inutile de le rajouter sur le bâti, cela fait doublon.
Je supprime donc le tag sur le bâti.

Donat
rauminet35 (2020-05-24 17:42:36+00:00): Bonsoir Donat,

Merci pour ta rectification. Je salue ta compétence ... qui me remplit de modestie.

Bien cordialement

Joël
gendy54 (2020-05-24 18:10:44+00:00): C'est pas une histoire de compétence mais d'expérience. J'ai aussi fait des "conneries" et je continue à en faire ;)
Tym K (2020-05-13 22:19:28+00:00): Looks good.
Frans S (2020-05-17 13:29:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I am reviewing your mappings and have some remarks.
The buildings are (except round huts) rather rectangular. please keep that in mind during mapping. Where a tree hide a part of the roof, extrapolate the building. Don't follow the line of the tree.
Please square each building you map with the Q key in IDeditor.
Best regards
gpserror (2020-05-15 16:17:37+00:00): Uh wow... Looks like this edit is messed up, should we request a revert on this?
pitscheplatsch (2020-05-15 05:15:51+00:00): Hi thompsonpsu, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SomeoneElse (2020-05-13 23:40:26+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments.  Having lots and lots of changes with a description of "Puts - adjustments" doesnt really help other mappers understand what changes you're making.  Also "source 	Aggregate" doesn't really help people understand what sources you were using either.  Was it a local survey, a GPS trace or somethng else?
Best Regards,
Andy
archie (2020-05-14 00:21:33+00:00): kind like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84976038?
user_5359 (2021-12-27 17:34:41+00:00): Hello! Please check the relgion value buddisth1 on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803502526. Did you mean buddisth?
BCNorwich (2020-05-14 07:02:23+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStretMap.

I've made a few amendments. 
Removed duplicate section of college road and path.
Move residential and park areas off of highway line.
Remove added nodes from Fleet.
Move areas off of highway center lines.
Remove unnecessary multipolygon (chapel), redo chapel.
Amend outline of Denyer House.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-05-16 07:22:59+00:00): Hi, You somehow created or left some untagged unneeded lines and polygons,
Way: 803511982, Way: 803511973, Way: 803511961, Way: 803511962 in this area. I've deleted them as that seemed easier than explaining to you exactly where they were. Please have regard to errors and/or warnings when uploading.

Regards Bernard.
owenward (2020-05-16 12:44:28+00:00): Hi,

Thank you. It was only lately that I discovered how to cycle through ways which overlapped each other. I have been more careful in addressing errors since then.

Owen
Jarek 🚲 (2020-05-14 00:55:45+00:00): I changed the public transit relation for the GO 40 bus since it's PTv2. Didn't bother with the others as they're PTv1 so not crucial for routing anyway.

I didn't make the intersection between the south crosswalk way and the west sidewalk way because the west sidewalk is a single way all the way up to 16th which would give me a huge bounding box. Sorry, not sorry.
harmor (2020-05-19 22:18:55+00:00): Wieso hast du am „Sengscheider Hof“  in St. Ingbert die Adresse gelöscht  aber disused:amenity restaurant nicht?
Hier ist ein Hotel !!!
Ändere doch nur das was du kennst !!!
BeKri (2020-05-20 06:25:10+00:00): Ja wieso wohl ???? WIESO ???
Weil ich vielleicht etwas gemacht habe 
was DIR scheinbat nicht passiert, einen FEHLER !

Servus hamor, (Anrede darf schon sein)

Es ist schon üblich seinem Gegenüber ein Hinweis zu geben
um WAS es überhaupt geht.
Meinst Du jetzt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136893697
oder
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/136893993
???
Wenn Du #1 meinst, ist da der Birkenkopfweg 4 ?
UNd wenn ja warum ist dann um die Ecke
(wohl jetztiger/ neuer Standort Sengscheider Hof)
noch ein Birkenkopfweg 4 ?
Gibt's bei Euch Adressen zweimal ? wohl kaum ...
#1 scheint ja wohl Zum Ensheimer Gelösch 30 (ehemaliger Standort Sengscheider Hof ?) zu sein ?

WO ist jetzt DEIN Hotel ?
Hotel war und ist nirgends eingetragen (hätte man/ ich machen können)
es ging mehr/ ausschließlichum 	Axel‘s Restaurant
Wenn Du schon weiß, wo ein Hotel ist,
trag's ein und es besteht Klarheit,  Danke !
So gibt es den Sengscheider Hof a zwei Stellen mit verwirrenden Adressen !
	
Abschliesend ein paar Worte zu Deinem Stil:
Ich bin ja auch ein Freund der aufbrausenden Worte
aber vielleicht unterstellst Du anderen
nicht gleich Absicht und Unvermögen
und vielleicht geht's auch mit a bisserl WENIGER AUSRUFEZEICHEN ;-)
Den letzten Satz kannst Du Dir auch sparen,
halte Deine Gegend sauber, dann pfuscht Dir keiner rein.
So, und jetzt bist Du dran ;-))

Auf konstuktieve Zusammenarbeit und immer locker bleiben
wünscht sich
derBeKri
tomhukins (2020-05-18 11:10:00+00:00): Thank you for helping to improve the map.  I don't know this area, but it looks like your change fixes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1792887
BCNorwich (2020-05-16 07:25:00+00:00): Hi, I've amended the tags on the garden to OSM practice.

Regards Bernard.
owenward (2020-05-16 12:42:46+00:00): Hi,

That garden doesn't actually have a name, in fact it may be part of the Argyle School grounds. May I remove the name?

Owen
BCNorwich (2020-05-16 12:59:36+00:00): Hi Owen, 

I've removed the name, I had thought you meant it as a name.

Regards Bernard.
owenward (2020-05-16 13:11:12+00:00): Hi,

It must have been a typo or an old tag that I overlooked. Thanks for removing it.

Owen
aharvey (2020-05-14 08:19:40+00:00): Hi, I can still see some kind of service road/driveway connecting these two streets on the aerial imagery, has that changed recently?
Dive (2020-05-15 03:34:20+00:00): Not sure, I will have to visit and check. I imagine there is.
I changed it because it looked like a continuous road, but graphhopper would not route through it.
aharvey (2020-05-15 03:38:25+00:00): It has a bollard mapped, which would block vehicles, so I can't see anything wrong unless the bollard has since been removed.
sunilaak (2020-05-14 02:55:47+00:00): Hi,
Apologies for the usage of internal terminology on OSM. The correct comment for this changeset is as follows :
**added unmaintained track road.***
Regards,
sunilaak
nevw (2020-05-14 04:20:12+00:00): Hi
I noticed that the buildings bound by Monash Freeway, Feentree Gully Road and Springvale Road are tagged Glen Waverley,  3150.

Should they be tagged Waverley Gardens, 3170 instead as shown on another map I saw.

#10-11 Rosemary Court is an exception and tagged Glen Waverley, 3170 ?

I am not local so I am unable to sort this out, can you fix it thanks?
byron1989 (2020-05-14 23:18:40+00:00): I am not sure  but the business owners at 10-11believe they in 3070 and several other maps  I have looked at also state this.
sunilaak (2020-05-14 02:56:26+00:00): Hi,
Apologies for the usage of internal terminology on OSM. The correct comment for this changeset is as follows :
**Added Driveway***
Regards,
sunilaak
bhietsch (2020-07-09 19:03:49+00:00): Curious - any particular reason you changed the paths here to be bridle paths? I'll admit it's been a long time since I've visited Gettysburg, but from what I can recall the trails there are pretty much entirely dedicated to foot traffic
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-06-11 01:17:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11097596#map=19/-16.66984/-49.25378

Essa restrição que voce criou está errada, ficou impossivel sair da Araguaia para a Paranaíba
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-06-11 01:20:10+00:00): Agora vi que esta certo de certa forma, mas seria mais correto eliminar o trecho que permitia, pois ele ficou inacessivel de todos os acessos.
Adellane (2020-06-11 14:52:24+00:00): Bom dia.
Então, essa conversão é proibida há anos e fiquei surpreso de isso não está ainda refletido no mapa numa região tão central. Eu tinha notado que era mais fácil elimiinar a via que falou. Contudo eu não fiz isso pois para quem vem da praça cívida pela avenida araguaia e deseja fazer a conversão à esquerda na avenida paranaíba esse via parece bem natural. Agora ao tirar ela como você fez não ficou natural pois dá a impressão que só é possível fazer essa conversão à direita na avenida paranaíba. Tanto é que se você olhar na imagem de satélite ou pessoalmente vai reparar que tem uma divisão na pista com faixa especiais na avenida araguaia, para quem vem da praça cívica, para que o condutor entre na faixa correta para ver se faz a conversão à esquerda ou à direita.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-06-11 15:07:14+00:00): Entendi, mudei a estética as restrições pra ficar melhor, mas não era esse o problema, anteriormente um trecho tinha ficado inutilizado, por isso a mensagem.
Adellane (2020-06-21 21:53:05+00:00): Boa noite,Olhei esse trecho acima, hoje no openstreetmaps, dia 21 de junho e continua com a permissão errada para converter à esquerda para a avenida paranaíba para quem vem na avenida araguaia sentido centro. Achei que você tivesse consertado. O certo era para ser proibida essa conversão.Será que mudou alguma coisa? Tem um mês que não vou à Goiânia.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-06-21 23:01:43+00:00): corrigido
ElliottPlack (2020-07-02 04:15:52+00:00): Hello again, by now I trust you've seen https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3768 from Woodpeck. We need to roll back these changesets where you've tagged walking paths as bridleways throughout the Gettysburg area. Unless these trails are designed primarily for horse travel, they should not be mapped this way. You seem to have a lot of knowledge around the Gettysburg area. Could you change any paths that are walking paths to the "Path" tag?
rab (2020-08-07 12:28:12+00:00): Hello,
you missed to modify the turn:lanes
Takadanobaba (2020-08-10 20:25:23+00:00): Hi rab,
Thank you for letting me know about this! I’ve reviewed this area and updated the turn lane tags to accurately represent the dual carriageway modeling.
rab (2020-08-11 11:57:57+00:00): Thank you
BohdanKuts (2020-05-16 14:51:42+00:00): Hi Jabir_hussain!
Please, do not make changes which covers such a large area. Because there are some limitations and problems when trying to riview them due to the size of the area. Smaller changsets are easier to review and manage :) Next time, please make changeset in smaller regions at a time.
Thanks!
pitscheplatsch (2020-05-14 05:37:46+00:00): Hi AU84, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting the entire mapped golf course? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=85172206

#GolfMapping
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
save2desk (2020-05-14 14:17:42+00:00): Народные тропы правилами OSM не запрещены.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85172257
richter_fn (2020-05-15 07:47:36+00:00): Опять тропы начали зарастать?
Вот, например, на Сысольской за ДЮСШ:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=iwSyTbXvkQd0axs88ypTNA&focus=photo видно даже человека, уходящего в лес
И рядом https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=i2x4yF7qJLuQ5L2vGgaW9g&focus=photo
никаких заборов, только нахоженное место.
richter_fn (2020-05-15 07:50:26+00:00): Или на Сысольской/Магистральной:
https://goo.gl/maps/wHL21ngTKQWyL6MA6
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=P6T5W5zLD4StkqI_8vS7vg&focus=photo
что может помешать там ходить?
richter_fn (2020-05-15 07:51:19+00:00): И рядом на Магистральной:
https://goo.gl/maps/9VZEwxMJuFLX8cZp6
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=JNu4FD5OdHOvN9hK0_Hq_w&focus=photo
Всё на месте.
richter_fn (2020-05-15 07:52:40+00:00): На 5-й Каховской:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=AcEfMbtYGCzoc544ImQadw&focus=photo
что могло случиться с тропинкой за месяц, если уж даже по таким сугробам там нахожено?
richter_fn (2020-05-15 07:54:54+00:00): И на Ушакова тропинка за лавочкой всё так же уходит в лес:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=k_AKSUZ8vWloFiEr7zdlGQ&focus=photo
richter_fn (2020-05-15 08:01:05+00:00): Про тропинки на Спешилова около Ашана я уже спрашивал тут:
https://osm.org/changeset/84540600, тоже прошу прокомментировать.
save2desk (2020-05-18 05:17:03+00:00): Откатил пакетом https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85358058.
Причина - регулярные необоснованные удаления существующих объектов.
save2desk (2020-05-14 14:24:44+00:00): Цитирую osm-wiki на тему highway:path:
"Тропа (чаще всего, стихийная) использующаяся пешеходами, либо одним или несколькими видами транспорта, кроме четырехколесного (лыжи, снегоход, велосипед). Местами визуально не распознаётся, так как может проходить по любым типам поверхности."
save2desk (2020-05-14 14:27:17+00:00): И вот эти вот самые стихийные переходы мной и отмечены. Кроме того, к точкам перехода местными натоптаны столь же стихийные тропы.
save2desk (2020-05-14 14:33:32+00:00): Другой вопрос, стоит ли отмечать такие переходы как crossing:unmarked, но претензии у тебя, похоже не к типу перехода. И да, если систематически заниматься массовыми удалениями и игнорировать комментарии, то можно получить, например, десятилетний бан.
save2desk (2020-05-14 17:08:21+00:00): И ещё цитата из osm-wiki, которую мы оба можем понимать по-своему:
"crossing=unmarked
Место, где есть пересечение пешеходной дорожки с автомобильной или железной дорогой, не обозначенное дорожной разметкой и не имеющее пешеходных светофоров."
richter_fn (2020-05-15 08:50:02+00:00): Ну и снова - что случилось с тропинками от остановки Сосновый бор в сторону города?
https://goo.gl/maps/8bDAUpy9pLp5u1Es9
https://goo.gl/maps/6AawCUoy3fzSyLN78
save2desk (2020-05-15 08:55:09+00:00): А вот и незаконные переходы возле ашана:
https://goo.gl/maps/1FsbEMf3tAxsfapS6
https://goo.gl/maps/P6EyDEndauMcBJ6y6
save2desk (2020-05-15 08:56:52+00:00): Целая сеть тропинок прямо под запрещающими знаками. :)
Anton Khorev (2020-05-17 19:36:34+00:00): Здравствуйте, Кирилл Хафизов.

Ваши правки и комментарии к пакетам вызывают некоторые вопросы:

* понимаете ли вы разницу между "вымышленными" и "устаревшими" объектами? Особенно её стоило бы понимать, если вы намерены использовать слово "вандализм", как в предыдущем пакете правок. Если вы называете удаляемую тропинку именно "вымышленной", вы имеете в виду не то, что она уже заросла, а то, что её никогда не было, или, по крайней мере, что рисовавшему её участнику не было известно о её существовании? 

* понимаете ли вы разницу между "несуществующим" и "запрещённым"? Удаляемые вами тропинки не существуют, или по ним запрещено ходить?

* знаете ли вы о существовании тега access? Вы им ни разу не пользовались, и при этом большая часть ваших действий - это удаления. Если вы на самом деле имели в виду, что проход через существующий объект запрещён, вместо удаления вам следовало бы воспользоваться этим тегом. Например, если тропинка идёт через железнодорожные пути, а вы уверены, что в этом месте переходить через них нельзя, вы могли бы поставить на соответствующий участок тропинки тег access=no. Конечно, использование данного тега не будет гарантией того, что другие участники согласятся с вашими правками, но количество разногласий наверняка уменьшится. В используемом вами редакторе iD тег access находится в поле "Общий доступ - Всем".

Антон Хорев  
Data Working Group
save2desk (2020-05-18 05:09:06+00:00): Откатил пакетом openstreetmap.org/changeset/85358058.
Причина - вымышленная вымышленность добавленных мной троп с источником "survey + gps".
ⵣZiri_Atlasⵣ (2025-03-06 11:44:07+00:00): Hi,
Why do you remove the names written in Latin letters and replace them with Arabic names?
user_5359 (2020-05-14 04:32:36+00:00): Hello! Why did you delete the street to the park slot between the booth buildings? Please switch to newer aerial images as bing.
Fendasis (2020-05-14 05:54:29+00:00): It was an unaware error I made on my side, I apologize.
user_5359 (2020-05-14 18:41:24+00:00): Hello! Please notice we use britisch English for the keywords. This means roof:colour instead roof:color.
user_3688357 (2020-05-20 10:54:24+00:00): Thank you for your comment.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:44:00+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Flurps (2020-07-07 14:33:58+00:00): Hey there,
This edit puts a service way thought the middle of a police station... pretty sure that's bogus. Could also be neater, looks like finger smudged paths.
PontaDoOuro (2020-07-07 20:43:52+00:00): Hey Flurps, thanks for reaching out. I rechecked this area and definitely agree with you about the service road. I’ve removed it and also adjusted the alignment of the back alley so it’s neater.
Flurps (2020-07-10 10:39:05+00:00): Thanks PontaDoOuro :)
Baloo Uriza (2020-05-15 17:19:46+00:00): Pretty incomplete and very, very obviously a public school.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85174322
kurugunk (2020-05-18 05:32:18+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the edit. According to our understanding, though school is publicly owned and maintained, it shouldn't be accessed by all the public due to child safety concerns. The access needs to be open for parents, children, school staff and deliveries who will have all the necessary permissions to access the road. In this case as the road is connected between two residential roads, without access tag. Vehicles may use it as shortcut to reach either of the connected roads. Moreover as private is not completely restrictive tag, according to OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate) vehicles can access private roads on individual case to case basis. 
However, we are open for your inputs on this. 
Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
kurugunk.
Joseph E (2020-10-11 06:15:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803547358 and other ways with waterway=tidal_channel in this area are incorrect. A tidal channel is only found by the sea, where there are tides.