piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Minimalis (2020-08-06 14:11:02+00:00): Ahoj, je dobře, že se konečně někdo věnuje  Ml. Boleslavi. Bohužel je to na můj vkus až moc posunuté proti skutečnosti, i proti katastrální mapě. Ať už jde o parkovací místa, nebo travnaté plochy. Mimochodem. Je to opravdu neudržovaná louka - natural = grassland?  Autobusové zastávky jsou převážně body. Nástupiště jako plocha jsou na vlakových nádražích, tramvajové jsou většinou čára, V obou přpípadech jsou to ale pouze grafické reprezentace bez názvu. Máš nějaký důvod je předělávat na plochy? 
Electro World je posunutý o 3 metry na sever až na trávu. Takže zkus tu katastrální mapu.
tux67 (2020-08-06 14:12:46+00:00): Hi inean36,
right now your changesets are inconsistent and look more like vandalism, than like real OSM Contributions. Please stop that and support with real data. Changesets up to now are most likely to be reverted.
Br
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89040668
osmviborg (2020-08-06 14:37:15+00:00): Please don't modify the address nodes. Create a separate POI.
pyram (2020-08-07 13:59:28+00:00): Review:
Hi, I have seen your request.
You should not map buildings or highways again (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834675153 ), when they are already mapped ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/722395682 ).
(I deleted some of this duplicates)

Best regards
pyram
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
aharvey (2020-08-11 22:47:17+00:00): hi, while most of the changes here look good, I noticed a couple of these fire stations were already mapped as an area covering the grounds, not just the main building, in these cases the primary tags like contact etc should go on the existing amenity=fire_station. For example you added amenity=fire_station to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397201960/history but the fire station was already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/792923178. Did you want to fix this up, or should I?
PJ1342 (2020-08-12 03:22:19+00:00): Hi, thanks for that, i will edit it sometime today.
PJ1342 (2020-08-12 04:02:47+00:00): updated in changset 89276752
aharvey (2020-08-12 11:14:24+00:00): Thanks for fixing that one. A few other things I noticed:

1. There is also https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/498123668 which was already mapped at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498123670

2. I don't think https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Demergency_access is entirely correct here, these are mostly https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway. service=emergency_access would be for say an office building which has a separate access road specifically for firefighters.

3. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/761474319 and https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/766373702 added the building tag, but this way is for the grounds, the building is already mapped there.
PJ1342 (2020-08-12 11:51:26+00:00): No worries, updated the RFS stations on changeset 89302671 (hopefully that is what you asked for).
Also in regards to the emergency_access tag on the stations that is those driveways aren't commonly used for public access only for firefighters. Any other issues feel free to tell me and i can fix it.
aharvey (2020-08-12 12:46:51+00:00): Thanks

1. Are you saying that https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/498123668 is still used by the RFB but not the main building?

2. service=driveway doesn't imply anything about access if anything a sensible default would be to assume that service=driveway is private, but accessible for deliveries, people who work there etc. You can always add the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access tag as well

3. https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/761474319 and https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/766373702 still appear to have been tagged as a building even though their geometry is covering the grounds, so these shouldn't have the building tag.
PJ1342 (2020-08-12 13:41:41+00:00): Ah ok, i am happy that you can change it.
PJ1342 (2020-08-12 13:44:14+00:00): From your 1st point that was a error on my end and that the building is unrelated to the RFB.
aharvey (2020-08-13 01:41:27+00:00): No problem, I've fixed the rest of the issues up now.
skyper (2020-10-22 23:05:29+00:00): Hallo schmichael

Warum hast Du denn die Parkplätze alle noch einmal eingetragen? Jetzt sind sie alle doppelt vorhanden.
schmichael (2021-05-02 18:26:12+00:00): Hallo skyper,

wenn ich mich noch recht erinnere, gab es zuvor keinen optischen Hinweis auf ein Parkplatz, sprich man hat der Karte nicht angesehen, dass an entsprechender Stelle ein Parkhaus ist noch wo genau sich die Einfahrt befindet. Beides finde ich essentiell auf einer Landkarte.

Schöne Grüße,
schmichael.
skyper (2021-05-03 19:15:44+00:00): Hi schmichael

Das liegt daran, dass die Eingänge, `amenity=parking_entrance`, dargestellt wird, aber keine Tiefgaragen, da diese öfters Probleme bereiten.

Auch hier sehe ich den Grund also nur in der Darstellung der Karte. Dies wird auch "Taggen für den Renderer" und sollte weitestgehend vermieden werden.

Grüße skyper
mueschel (2020-08-08 11:20:30+00:00): Hi,
you used several tags here that are not common.
- 'amenity=school' is missing
- 'governance_type' should be 'operator:type'
- 'category' should be 'school' or 'isced:level'
- 'school code' should be something like 'ref:XYZ'
- 'village type' is not used anywhere else

Could you please have a look and fix these?
4004 (2020-08-10 00:20:07+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
мини магазин - это конв. и название у него, насколько я понял, "Сосед" а не "Магазин Сосед"
ACarlotti (2020-08-07 16:06:06+00:00): You've merged cycleways on opposite side of the road into the same way; I think that's a bad idea, since in reality they aren't directly connected and noone would normally want to travel directly from one to the other. It can also cause renderers to put oneway arrows in strange places.
DaveF (2020-08-07 16:33:54+00:00): It's seems strange they'd render at node points. Split them to see if it sorts it. Ta.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
user_8334278 (2020-08-06 14:17:43+00:00): it is complicated i can only do what i saw.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:21:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89044763
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
Lokai (2021-09-05 04:44:04+00:00): Hallo, der Wochenendplatz soll ein Naturschutzgbiet sein.

Wie verhält es sich damit?

Gruß

Siehe hier
https://naturschutz.rlp.de/Dokumente/rvo/nsg/pdf/NSG-7332-111.pdf
SHARCRASH (2021-08-21 11:47:22+00:00): Hi! Do you have a source(s) for having added these ways to Via Agrippa? It's interesting because on the South-Western end of those tracks on node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/353928150 there seems to be unnatural shaped terrain going down the hill to the existing primary road bridge. Though it's in conflict with Stereo's findings about "Rue des Romains" but for this alternative there is a cliff on the other side of the river and no evidence on LIDAR's imagery. See extra notes/fixmes on these elements: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806231823
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806231824
Anakil (2020-08-07 17:41:50+00:00): Bonjour,
Le garde champêtre m'avait indiqué que ce morceau de sentier n'existait plus (c'était juste le bord du champs) et ne devait plus être utilisé (l'année passée il surveillait les environs) car cela gênait les animaux en bordure de la réserve. Est-ce que ça a changé ? :-)

Bien à toi,
Anakil
WRiyVoV25eMZnu (2020-08-07 19:16:23+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour le commentaire. En effet je n'ai pas d'avis officiel. Ma proposition de rajout se base sur le fait que le sentier semble présent sur les cartes topo50 IGN (https://topomapviewer.ngi.be/?l=fr&x=675275.07&y=653216.73&zoom=9&baseLayer=classic.maps) et que c'est un chemin visiblement fréquenté à en voir le tassement du sol.

Je vais supprimer mon rajout alors si le garde champêtre est contre son usage. 

Bien à toi, 
Alexandre
BCNorwich (2020-08-06 17:35:57+00:00): Hi, tagging this as layer=1 means the walkway is above the buildings, is this correct?
SHARCRASH (2020-08-06 15:06:35+00:00): + tags added
DressyPear4 (2020-08-08 16:36:27+00:00): Olá, evite deletar vias em cruzamentos, você deixou partes sem roteamento e restrições quebradas, peça ajuda a um mapeador mais experiente para edições avançadas, algumas vias foram adicionadas por cima de outras já existentes.
O mesmo acontece com os bairros, todos já estavam mapeados em modo de relação, mas como pode ver, agora estão faltando partes, não havia necessidade de ter adicionado uma nova área.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89046447
DressyPear4 (2020-08-08 16:38:11+00:00): Veja esse exemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9289392#map=16/-29.0316/-51.1770
Daniel S Lazzari (2020-08-08 16:40:54+00:00): Sendo completamente honesto, não faço a mínima idéia do que isso quer dizer.
santamariense (2020-08-11 03:01:44+00:00): @Daniel, recuperei a delimitação de bairros. Sugiro que enquanto aprende a mapear, não delete qualquer objeto, nem mesmo pontos que façam parte de linhas ou relações.
Sugiro também que utilize grupos do Telegram para tira-dúvidas rápidas. Lá a gente aprende bastante e troca ideias. Junte-se a nós em diversos grupos [ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato ].
Exemplos:
* Esta linha [ https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667962341 ] que você deletou e recuperei, ela faz parte da relação de um bairro e não deve ser deletada. O mesmo vale para inúmeras outras linhas na mesma situação. Por motivos como este, sugiro fortemente que não delete objetos até entender os conceitos atrelados a eles.
É preciso que você entenda também o conceito de relação [ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Rela%C3%A7%C3%A3o ]. Basicamente no que tange a delimitação de uma área, como no caso de um bairro, se faz uso dos próprios elementos que são divisas como ruas, rios, cercas, ou mesmo linhas imaginárias para compor os limites dos bairros, e eles são agrupados em relações. Exemplo: O que você representou em https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834739866/history , já estava melhor representado em forma de relação em https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9289386 . Perceba no último a presença de "membros". Essa sequência de membros representa os limites do bairro Vêneto.
Qualquer dúvida é só chamar. Bons mapeamentos.
santamariense
Daniel S Lazzari (2020-08-11 03:06:37+00:00): Ok, muito obrigado
GinaroZ (2020-09-02 17:25:08+00:00): I'm a bit confused how you managed to edit a road named "The Roundabout" miles away from anything else!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28840295/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
naveenpf (2020-09-22 10:20:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89046533
b-jazz (2020-08-07 00:55:17+00:00): Hi there jwneptune,

Roads are already mapped for that stretch and they have appropriate speed limits defined. If those speeds are incorrect, you should modify the existing ways instead of adding additional ones along with the old ones. Also, make sure you include the units along with the speed (e.g. "35 mph") instead of just "35". I've gone ahead and deleted the two roads you added in this change. If there are multiple speed limits for the road, just split the way in two at the speed limit change and set the resulting sub-segments to the new limits.
eggie (2020-08-06 15:52:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Je highway=unclassified die over de parkeerplaats loopt zit aan de oostzijde vast aan de landsuse = grass ipv aan de weg. Eeg weg over een parkeerplaats is meestal een highway=service  met service=parking_aisle
Je hebt een bankje verwijderd en een ander bankje verplaatst en vastgeplakt aan de amenity=university. Dus beter losmaken.
Het wandelpad aan de Reelaan naar het zuiden eindigt ook op de landuse =forest ipv op de weg. 
Kijk nog eens goed naar je edits hier.. 


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=89046705

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-08-06 15:56:49+00:00): Eén pad heb je zo getekend dat de landuse forest is verplaatst en nu vastzit op de kruising van dat pad en Campuslaan. 
Editor plakt alles aan elkaar als je niet uitkijkt. 
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken of over te schakelen op een betere editor als josm. Dan heb je meer overzicht voor dit soort bijdragen.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Eggie
eggie (2020-08-06 16:09:51+00:00): Bovenin heb ik wat landuse losgemaakt en wegen verbonden met wegen ipv aan  landuse
Denk dat je je werk nog eens goed moet nalopen.
Veel plezier met mappen
Gr eggie
Frans S (2020-09-10 09:36:01+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them. Half of the buildings you did not square should be squared. 
Please go over this task again (505) and modify them

Most buildings here( not all) have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
BCNorwich (2020-08-06 17:33:47+00:00): Hi, again the must be some access here as there are cars at the buildings.
MLruns (2020-08-06 17:35:18+00:00): There’s no public access. It’s a private drive that’s inaccessible to the public.
BCNorwich (2020-08-06 17:43:21+00:00): Hi then the tag is access=private. But then it would mean deliveries cannot be made by vehicle.
trigpoint (2020-08-07 12:19:43+00:00): There should be no problem tagging these as private. In ordering something for delivery you are giving permission for access.

Any router worth its salt will popup a dialog and ask, For example OSMand says "Your destination is located in an area with private access. Allow using private roads for this trip?"

Cheers Phil
Thundercel (2020-08-07 21:39:22+00:00): Acabei de excluir o acesso da Rua Doutor Aniceto Frizzera Filho para a Avenida Santa Leopoldina porque ele não existe. O condutor que quiser acessar terá de entrar no posto shell ou no estacionamento da Drogasil. Passei por la ainda pouco e fui obrigado a virar a esquerda na Luciano das Neves
LucFreitas (2020-08-08 21:11:10+00:00): Obrigado! Eu fiquei em dúvidas quanto este acesso, mas acabei mantendo porque ele já existia no mapa.
BCNorwich (2020-08-06 17:32:33+00:00): Hi, you've drawn the highway through a building and attached it to the corner of another building. Access=no must be incorrect as there are vehicles at the houses. So there's at least private access. Could you rectify the problems please.

regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-08-15 08:51:44+00:00): Cheers!
b-jazz (2020-08-07 01:00:43+00:00): Hello Ohio,

You might want to go back and look at your import in this changeset (and possibly others using the same methodology). There are a ton of unconnect nodes being dropped all over the place. And for a possibly related reason, some of the house geometry is making some strange non-rectangle zig zags around. Check out the following node in a sea of other unconnected nodes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7791950986
ohiomapper (2020-08-07 07:03:53+00:00): Oh no, looks like JOSM had some problems with the upload. Very annoying... I'll redo this area soon.
ohiomapper (2020-08-07 08:00:15+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89078267
b-jazz (2020-08-07 18:25:11+00:00): Thanks! Those building shapes look a lot more sane now. :)
Pontius (2020-08-08 03:48:32+00:00): Does the US have Living Streets? The wiki seems to limit the designation to streets whereon cars legally must yield to pedestrians. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#United_States
PilotJosh357 (2020-08-08 16:03:23+00:00): It seems I was mistaken. I will submit a change to residential.
BCNorwich (2020-08-06 17:39:47+00:00): Hi, you've tagged as layer=-1 but is there a passage way through the building. Then is it layer=-1 across to the highways each end?
Regards Bernard.
Jeremie Joannes (2020-08-07 08:34:08+00:00): Hi, changed to covered:building_passage
BCNorwich (2020-08-07 13:25:34+00:00): Hi, sorry I should have said Welcome to OpenStreetMap and I ought to have mentioned this page in the beginning :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tunnel
I've tweaked the path to suit OSM tagging.

Regards Bernard
Jeremie Joannes (2020-08-07 14:13:35+00:00): Hi, thanks! So you would tag as tunnel:building_passage as well as (footway) covered:building_passage?
BCNorwich (2020-08-07 16:25:03+00:00): Hi, No sorry (just shows anyone can make mistakes, I must look/think twice). Only needs one passage tag, I've removed the covered tag, tunnel=building_passage implies it is covered.

Regards Bernard..
ACarlotti (2020-08-07 16:54:44+00:00): You didn't notice that there was already a node for the traffic signals at the end of the bus lane to the east of Coldhams Lane (it was first mapped slightly too far west in 2009). I've merged that node with your node for the end of the bus lane.
highflyer74 (2020-08-07 06:38:50+00:00): Hallo willypommes!

Darf ich fragen, warum Du diesem Springbrunnen das Attribut einer Quelle hinzugefügt hast?

Dies scheint laut Wikipedia Artikel (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_Coburger_Brunnen#Gurken-Alex-Brunnen) nicht so zu sein.

Bitte melde Dich einmal, damit wir die Lage klären können. Danke!
DressyPear4 (2020-08-08 16:00:02+00:00): Olá, não adicione vias onde já estão mapeadas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89048786
Gustavo22Soares (2022-10-23 21:35:27+00:00): Oi,
Estou vendo que nenhuma imagem de satélite está batendo com os dados que você adicionou poderia me dizer qual foi a fonte e fornecer o link para ela por favor?
att.
Gustavo Soares
Frans S (2020-08-11 12:46:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Quite accurate.
Just a remark. Try to avoid that nodes of buildings connect to other features.
Best regards
I copy you som hints to improve your mapping skills. (if needed :-) )
Kovoschiz (2020-08-06 17:11:44+00:00): Can you explain why you moved it upstream?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/89049800
Free gems 8 (2020-08-07 07:07:14+00:00): Because I want to move to the place that cars can't change lanes, that is the interchange.
Kovoschiz (2020-08-07 09:36:03+00:00): This is evidently false. Aside from the fact that you should use `change:lanes=`, this chopped off the remaining white dashed lines section.
Kovoschiz (2020-08-07 09:37:50+00:00): The geometry of lane drop can't be handled in this manner anyway.
Free gems 8 (2020-08-08 15:28:27+00:00): problem fixed.
ACarlotti (2020-08-07 17:07:09+00:00): I think you moved the stretch of road immediately east of Ditton Lane too far to the south, especially in comparison to the adjacent bits of Newmarket Road. I've now straightened out the inaccurate wiggle (which was partly there before, partly exacerbated in this changeset).
eggie (2020-08-06 18:18:55+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.

Eggie
marc__marc (2021-02-28 13:50:12+00:00): Bonjour,
pour info "piscine" dans la terminologie osm signifie "le bassin remplit d'eau" situé donc ici à l'intérieur du batiment.
le batiment dans son ensemble est, dans la terminologie osm, un centre sportif puisqu'on peux y faire de la natation et de l'aquagym.
si vous souhaitez renseigner le ou les bassins de 20m, n'hésitez pas à faire un 2ieme objet décrivant approximativement sa position dans le bassin.
je n'ai pas contre pas compris ce que vous vouliez dire avec location=yes : l'attribut location sert a décrire la localisation d'un élément (par exemple un défribilateur situé dans un batiment location=indoor).
peut-être vouliez-vous dire qu'il y a moyen de louer quelque chose et si oui quoi ? c'est l'attribut rental. par exemple rental=swimsuit pour la location de maillot de bain.
Cordialement,
Marc
DerGuteMercator (2020-08-08 14:35:14+00:00): Hi Garmin User,
I have seen that you reverted my changes, and I believe there is a misunderstanding. This was not a flaw, I have thought it well through before i made those changes. 

In the current state, we now have two cities of Gostivar, a node and an area. This is not correct. 
The notion in the wiki that an admin_centre should be a node is IMHO, wrong, see also the discussion page, where this also has been consensus.
user_177389 (2020-08-08 18:22:31+00:00): Hi, the consensus is not when less than a handful of people wrote an idea in 2009, 2011 or 2017, but what is on the wiki page. We have over 322,000 administrative border relations in Europe - that's consensual. (In my opinion it doesn't need members like subareas and admin_centre, but I don't force anyone to do that.)

In this respect, the relations "Gostivar" and "Municipality of Gostivar" are * technically * in order. You are right, however, there is now the place itself twice as a node and as an area. If someone removes the place tag in the admin_level-8 relation, it should be correct. It is usually unlikely that the place area and administrative area will match.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-09-23 14:34:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 91371619, 91373494, 91364469, 91369701 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some edits in Penicuik that were made using an inappropriate source (at the request of the user)
skyper (2021-12-10 12:56:03+00:00): Hallo Markus411
Leider sind nun die Busrouten beschädigt, da sie Lücken aufweisen und in die route_master gehören nur Route-Relationen und keine Linien oder Knoten.
ID ist leider auch nicht der beste Editor für ÖPV, das ist JOSM besser geeignet.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal bitte an. Wenn Du Fragen hast beaantworte ich sie gerne.

Grüße skyper
ma-rt-in (2020-08-10 13:58:08+00:00): Hallo,
woolltest du an den Sprothalle nicht noch ein building value übrig lassen?
vg