piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
luiswoo (2017-05-22 23:28:30+00:00): Это на основе этого проекта http://www.donland.ru/documents/Ob-utverzhdenii-osnovnojj-chasti-proekta-planirovki-i-proekta-mezhevaniya-territorii-razmeshheniya-avtomobilnojj-dorogi-obshhego-polzovaniya?pageid=128483&mid=134977&itemId=25601 ? Куцый немного, для Платова в подобном, не поленились развязки нарисовать.
-off- (2017-05-24 06:06:29+00:00): Почти. Я весь проект скачал с госзакупок http://www.zakupki.gov.ru/epz/order/notice/ea44/view/common-info.html?regNumber=0158200000517000108 и оттуда ось взяли "на глаз" посадил через dxf импорт.
-off- (2017-05-24 06:07:46+00:00): Написал на 1RND и в ДонНьюс что на нашей карте есть обход - чтобы они при публикации новостей могли использовать ОСМ.
-off- (2017-05-24 06:09:07+00:00): Тут одна развязка есть - ее я отрисовал. На таганрогской трассе развязка скорее всего будет отдельным проектом, т.к. это федеральная дорога, а обход областная.
luiswoo (2017-05-24 20:02:54+00:00): В каком же part оно всё было? :)
"На глаз"… хм вот картинка из pdf выше с привязкой (как смог) к кадастру https://yadi.sk/d/gln36YNC3JVbNd для пиктлаер, там от оси синий линии метров 30. Это составители pdf намудрили? Кадастр обычно на столько не врёт.
-off- (2017-05-29 07:41:34+00:00): Закинуло письмо в спам - только сейчас прочитал. 
Я все части скачал, чтобы не париться. Перевести координаты полосы отвода из МСК-61 в WGS минутное дело - я просто не стал заморачиваться, т.к. итак все нормально легло - привязка к существующей развязке, пересечение с Ростов-Дебальцево и примыкание к Ростов-Таганрог. Немного подправил "под рендер" участок, который идет параллельно дороге на чалтырь, т.к. он слишком близко и при отрисовке строящийся участок попадает под существующую дорогу.
elgolfo (2017-05-29 12:42:30+00:00): Hallo Wbmstr, zwei Dinge sind bei deinem Changeset falsch: 
1. Bei der Kirche zum Guten Hirten hast du 
den Grundriss verändert. Laut Bing Luftbild sieht die Kirche aber anders aus. Was soll der Appendix da links oben sein? Bitte repariere das wieder.
2. Bei der Dorfkirche Friedrichsfelde hast du wieder einmal ohne Angabe von Quellen den Namen geändert. Wenn du keine Quelle nennst wird mit an Sicherheit grenzender Wahrscheinlichkeit auch dieses Changeset wieder revertiert.
Polarbear (2017-06-12 16:09:06+00:00): Revert in 49473270: fictive changing of building layout; refusal to give source for changing church name in contrary to Wikipedia
wbmstr (2017-06-12 16:46:52+00:00): Fehler: Die alte pfk Lichtenberg befidet sich am loeperplatz in lichtenberg - Dies ist hier die Paul-Gerhard-Kirche bzw. die Dorfkirche Friedrichsfelde
Polarbear (2017-06-12 18:09:28+00:00): Quellen? Belege?
Polarbear (2017-06-12 18:53:38+00:00): Hinsichtlich der https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/de:Alte Pfarrkirche Lichtenberg hast du Recht. Für die Namensgebung nach Paul Gerhardt fehlt noch der Beleg. Hättest du den Weblink nicht schon wieder mutwillig gelöscht, wäre dir auch das fehlende 't' am Ende aufgefallen.
wbmstr (2017-06-12 19:05:58+00:00): Welchen weblink meinst du?
user_5359 (2017-05-23 07:39:18+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Und beide Geschäfte heißen Lohmar? Laut Webseite müsste doch das eine doch „HVEB Elektrotechnik“ lauten, oder übersehe ich da was?
Cascafico (2017-05-24 07:48:57+00:00): Ciao Roberto e benvenuto in OSM.
Dovrò cancellare le tuo modifiche perchè digitate su percorsi preesistenti. 
Poi, visto che l'hai digitato, ti chiedo se c'è un ingresso al Viale dei Tulipani di Villa Manin dalla strada publica ad ovest.
MMN-o (2017-05-23 18:58:36+00:00): Bra mappat, SA2TMS!
jumbanho (2017-05-23 14:13:37+00:00): It looks like the location has moved a lot, you're probably better off just creating a new node at the new location.
TheDutchMan13 (2017-05-23 13:38:17+00:00): Reverted due to unknown errors http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48917653
user_5359 (2017-05-23 11:05:16+00:00): Welcome ro OSM! Is this node described by http://woodrehab.com/ ? Please add a shop=kitchen.

If you need help: You are welcome!
01234 (2017-05-24 15:01:59+00:00): Its actually https://woodrehabinc.com, do you know if the pin for this address will now show up in the right spot on a go daddy website since they use this for their maps?
user_3216889 (2017-05-22 22:21:16+00:00): Als je de tag building=construction wijzigt naar building=yes, mag je ook de tag construction=* wel verwijderen.
calfarome (2017-05-23 19:29:08+00:00): Hi aziz dugongo, 
Thank you for your map edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Is this really a park?. In addition you are mistakenly naming the park as 'name=argini ' . Please review this wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Ddyke  and then fix your edits.
maraf24 (2017-09-19 08:36:18+00:00): Zobacz tę uwagę: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1145084
Możliwe?
km2bp (2017-09-21 06:45:03+00:00): Altana gdy ją widziałem w maju była w złym stanie technicznym,  dlatego przychylnie rozpatrzyłem uwagę że "rozebrana" Być może na to miejsce powstanie nowa , a wtedy ktoś będzie musiał dodać ją do mapy.
maraf24 (2017-09-21 10:39:47+00:00): Dzięki:)
Jakson Aquino (2017-06-17 14:20:39+00:00): Felipe, a Concha Acústica marcada como Edifício produz resultado estranho em 3D. Talvez ficasse melhor como área marcada como "Pedestrian Street" ou "Foot path" (talvez sem nome mas com adição de ponto marcado como "Anfiteatro"). Veja: http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=-3.7421167&lon=-38.5385162&zoom=20&camera.theta=48.812&camera.phi=-30.94
Felipe Alves (2017-06-18 16:18:38+00:00): Concordo com o resultado estranho, um pouco fora do real. Existem tags para arquibancadas, caminhos, palco, etc. É que não me importo ainda em entrar neste nível de detalhamento, nesta edição aí acho que só corrigi a área e a tag de anfiteatro, que antes era outra. Fique a vontade para melhorar, se tiver interesse.
Jakson Aquino (2017-06-18 22:35:09+00:00): Tentei encontrar uma solução, mas não consegui. Conceitualmente, da forma como você fez está correto: teatro, tipo=anfiteatro. Outras tags podem ser renderizadas com aparência mais realista, mas seriam conceitualmente incorretas.
Felipe Alves (2017-06-19 13:07:01+00:00): Pode tirar a tag building=yes, aí já não aparece mais na renderização como um bloco inteiro. Mas não sei como seria a melhor forma (mantendo simples) para renderizar mais realista.
Myazyk (2017-05-22 21:10:38+00:00): Хутір Кривий і струмок Кривий - це різні речі! На фіга ти перекладаєш "хутір Кривий" англійською як "Kryvyi Stream"!
Те саме стосується й інших назв. І не треба писати "River"
user_3957715 (2017-05-23 05:08:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4807220543
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/392869065
Шановний ! Проаналізуйте будь ласка мапи на анґлійській мові . на традицію , що як позначається . 
2/ Нам треба вирішити : хто зачинить питання по Верх . Яловець:
-  перетегувати хутір Гораківський так , щоб Зелена вулиця (НИЖНЯ З ПОШУКУ ) теж була як верхня в хутір Гораківський 
--- зайдіть на польську локацію нашого форуму , там є папка створена мною Прохання з України, там є лінк на файловий смітник у якому є дозволені топографічні мапи цієї територіі. Дозволені мапи -  мапи . котрим 70 років
Myazyk (2017-05-25 09:56:09+00:00): Хітір і річка - різні речі
Вулиця Зелена вся є у селі Верхній Яловець
Краще би ти там нічого не створював
user_3957715 (2017-05-25 10:20:34+00:00): Пошук спростовує ваші слова http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=%D0%97%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B0%20%D0%B2%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%86%D1%8F%20%D0%A8%D0%B5%D0%BF%D1%96%D1%82%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B0%20%D1%81%D1%96%D0%BB%D1%8C%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%B0%20%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B0#map=16/47.8184/25.0717
dgitto (2017-05-26 12:05:03+00:00): Via della Serra, con la preposizione minuscola
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-05-23 09:15:05+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue parmi les contributeurs Openstreetmap. Pour cette première contribution, je vois que tu as ajouté un lieu de culte (amenity=place_of_worship) - s'il s'agit d'une mosquée tu peux préciser religion=muslim. Si tu as des questions, je suis à ta disposition.
user_1566574 (2020-12-08 15:55:56+00:00): Concernant le chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495278138, il s'agit d'un parking et n'a jamais été une piscine. :/
Je vais corriger, mais étrange erreur...
5m4u9 (2017-05-23 02:49:49+00:00): hola, no se debe añadir el nombre de la casa o número en name, hacerlo en una etiqueta específica 

si hay tiendas añadir un punto, si es un edificio a builiding=apartaments, un galpon es un "tejado" y así.
user_3216889 (2017-05-22 22:23:34+00:00): Welkom geheten per PB.
user_3216889 (2017-05-22 22:28:54+00:00): Dit hotel stond al op de kaart. Maps.me is helaas niet de meest geschikte editor.
Wijziging teruggezet.
f00bar (2018-07-08 10:05:46+00:00): Moin,
ich finde ja irgendwie, dass die seamark-Eigenschaften da fehl am Platz sind. :)
Vielleicht eher historic=memorial oder so? Ich weiss leider nicht, wofür die Boje dort steht.
Grüsse,
f
dgitto (2017-05-23 06:01:34+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM. Due appunti:
Trony era già mappato: ho tolto il duplicato. Gemelli e De Pasquale sono cognomi e vanno in maiuscolo. Li ho corretti.
Buon mapping
JanisJf (2017-05-23 12:33:30+00:00): Dafür, dass die da den Zaun hingestellt haben sollten wir eigentlich deren POI löschen ;)
sofasurfer68 (2017-06-27 19:42:17+00:00): Hallo Janis, ich hab eh den Eindruck, dass der Zaun hauptsächlich dafür da es die, wenigen Gäste die sich von der schaurigen Webseite des Waldhotels Ziegelstadels und von den überwiegend schlechten Bewertungen in diversen Bewertungsportalen nicht abschrecken lassen, an der Flucht hindern soll. Hätte ich nicht so eine große Abneigung gegen Ämter und Behörden, hätte ich schon längst eine Anfrage gestellt, ob sie für den Zaun überhaupt eine Genehmigung haben.
anderfo (2017-08-15 07:18:48+00:00): Supert at du prøver å fjerne offset (typisk oppstått fra folk som tror Bing-satelittbildene ligger korrekt). Jeg har gjort litt av det samme i dag.
Vil du legge inn mtb:scale på flere stier?

PS. Jeg tror ikke Norgeibilder er en godkjent kilde for OSM!
Godkjente kilder er bl.a. Strava heatmap, DigitalGlobe Premium Imagery og Kartverkets N50.
Mikketeve (2017-08-15 18:49:08+00:00): Mye av den offset-feilen hadde jeg nok laget selv tidligere. :) Mye jobb å rette opp. Håper å gradere flere stier etterhvert som jeg får syklet dem noen flere ganger. Jeg tegner ikke direkte etter Norgeibilder, bruker det for å se flere detaljer enn satellittbildene - men skal være oppmerksom på det. Ferdes du i Bodømarka?
anderfo (2017-08-15 20:12:42+00:00): Aha. Ja, mye arbeid å rette det opp. Viktig å melde fra hvis du merker at andre innfører offset! 
Er sjelden i Bodø, men var innom og syklet der for et par uker siden. Supert terreng!
nammala (2017-05-24 06:31:57+00:00): Hi Radio1313,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Your edits seems good and glad that you are adding valuable data on Map. Just wanted to let you know that the `area=yes` tag which you have added is not a proper tag instead you can use the wiki to add the appropriate tag for ex: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:leisure.

Once again thanks for adding valuable data and please ping if you need any help in Mapping.

Regards,
nammala
eggie (2017-05-23 08:39:38+00:00): Dit is een lastige om dat goed te laten renderen.
Marián Kyral (2017-05-23 04:31:16+00:00): Ahoj, žádná wikidata tam nevidím, zato mraky posunutých bodů, které udělaly zubaté cesty: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/50.1037/14.3004 :-(
elkueb (2017-05-23 06:29:31+00:00): Err,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9232412#map=15/48.2464/16.4048

huh?
woodpeck_repair (2017-05-23 06:41:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48906966 where the changeset comment is: revert changeset that accidentally seems to have moved a lot of nodes, breaking geometries
woodpeck (2017-05-23 06:46:11+00:00): It appears that this changeset accidentally moved a large number of nodes. Strangely, the longitude has not been changed, and the latitude has been reduced by approximately 0.01 (~ 1 kilometre) for all nodes. See http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/9232412.png (temporary link) for a screenshot of the resulting breakage. It would be very good to find out how this could happen, so that the software you have used could be improved to avoid such issues in the future!
rmikke (2017-05-23 15:42:24+00:00): What I have done:

* Loaded results of this query to JOSM: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/peX
* Retrieved wikidata IDs with wikipedia plugin
* Saved that back to OSM.

There were some errors detected when uploading to OSM, but I haven't tried to correct any of them. However, the whole process took some time, so it is not quite impossible that I have accidentally moved.

I have done the same earlier for other locations and there were no problems, so most probably it's an accidental move rather than a bug. I suppose I try it again later on and let's see if this moves objects again. I will put a note here that I have done it. Will this be OK?
rmikke (2017-05-23 15:52:29+00:00): By "errors when uploading to OSM" I mean JOSM's validator detected errors that existed earlier - there was a duplicated relation at least, and countless warnings. I haven't tried to correct any of it exactly because I didn't want to touch anything else than wikidata IDs.
rmikke (2017-05-23 21:30:55+00:00): OK, I've repeated the procedure. It took much less time now, as most wikidata ids have been added in an earlier run (before the error).
Please check, there should be no displacement.
rmikke (2017-05-23 21:33:26+00:00): By the way, all the objects returned by the Overpass query now, require some manual action. In Poland it was usually updating a wikipedia link, as someone changed the title of wikipedia article for whatever reason.
neuhausr (2017-05-23 17:37:53+00:00): I see that you've added local_ref to some of the bus stops, but it seems like you're using it incorrectly. According to the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:local_ref) local_ref should be used to tag one platform within a station. You are using it for the bus route numbers, which are already present in the route_ref tag.
Your Village Maps (2017-05-24 00:19:07+00:00): Looks like you're right. And so I have learned yet another detail about something I assumed was correct for so long. Openstreetmap really needs to develop one or more online courses for new (and old!) mappers to help get more people "on the same page" regarding things like this. Also, the Wiki is also somewhat ambiguous. I think that OSM-US should adopt strict standards for bus stops and bus routes. Looks like instead of adding what bus routes stop at a bus stop we are supposed to add them to that route's Relation. I noticed that most (or maybe all?) bus stops in the Twin Cities were imported and I wonder about some of the tags, many of which are not mentioned in the OSM wiki. Should these be deleted. Some time ago I adopted the new practice of deleting non-OSM tags from TIGER-imported streets AFTER I edit them....so maybe the same should be done here? Or maybe person(s) who imported the bus stops should do it?
neuhausr (2017-05-25 15:15:28+00:00): I am constantly learning new details too! :) There is an effort to move to a different tagging scheme for transit, so that doesn't make it any easier. The new scheme distinguishes between the bus stop location where one waits (public_transport=platform) and the place where the bus stops on the road network (public_transport=stop_position) which is a bit overkill for my taste but YMMV. Re the TC bus stops, tags with the metcouncil: prefix can probably stay--there is some useful info in there, although it may get stale. I think there was widespread agreement that TIGER import included a lot of extraneous tags that could now be deleted. I don't know if you subscribe to any mailing lists or follow forums or anything, but one great way to keep up with the wider world of OSM stuff is http://weeklyosm.com/
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-05-23 03:55:30+00:00): Better use clear changeset comments when doing your edits as part of the LGU-led mapping. A better comment here is "Batangas City LGU/CDPO mapping: add high school in Sto. Niño, Batangas City"
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-05-23 03:54:49+00:00): Better use clear changeset comments when doing your edits as part of the LGU-led mapping. A better comment here is "Batangas City LGU mapping: add elementary school in Sto. Niño, Batangas City"
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-05-23 03:53:49+00:00): Better use clear changeset comments when doing your edits as part of the LGU-led mapping. A better comment here is "add barangay hall of Sto. Niño, Batangas City"
osmer120311 (2017-08-09 16:42:30+00:00): Сейчас же действует новая построенная дорога на том участке, зачем изменили на старый вариант? Снимки Bing в том месте старые
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-05-23 03:50:41+00:00): This is certain that this is mapping led by the Batangas City LGU, but better use more clear comments for other mappers to be aware of. If you have any questions, you can reply here.
GOwin (2017-05-25 01:24:33+00:00): Do you have contact information of the office/department leading this effort?
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-05-25 06:16:23+00:00): No, but that department of the LGU, the CPDO, is already the presumed department that maps missing POI's in barangays, tagging building classifications, and the like. Please see this talk-ph mailing list thread: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2017-April/006083.html. Brad-M is perhaps with the same LGU department (i.e. the CPDO) with the user mentioned in that thread. I have commented to changesets of other users ("digmaan", EAA22, crops production) that I presumed to map for the Batangas City LGU in the past months when activity in Batangas City is very high.
GOwin (2017-05-25 07:28:08+00:00): Thanks! I opened a ticket here, and proposed next steps: https://git.io/vHOPC
Supaplex (2017-07-09 16:14:19+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
manoharuss (2017-05-24 06:35:18+00:00): Hi Emanuel017,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. Just wanted to mention that http://learnosm.org/en/ is a good resource to get started. If you want any help in understanding anything. I would be glad to help.

Thank you.

Manohar
literan (2017-05-23 09:46:46+00:00): не надо портить. Магазины называются именно так. Откатываю.
Super-Map (2017-06-09 05:43:59+00:00): Hi rdacardenas,
Why did you change the tag residential area for "area"? It's an "residential area, urban zone with lot of buildings ender constructions. I was a part of my work on the folowing project througouth Humanitarian OpenstreetMap Team: "2677 - Peru Flood Support 2: Cayma"
By advance thanks for you answer.
Super-Map (2017-06-09 05:45:51+00:00): It was a part of my "work"... "wrong "taping" on my keyboard.
rdacardenas (2017-06-09 15:18:08+00:00): Hi Super-Map, I live in that city, I made that because the covered area is very extensive and it is also covering zones without houses, even areas like the airport or cemetery, which is bad use of residential landuse. By moment I'm coordinating with other members who live there too to improve that mapping.
carciofo (2017-07-08 20:32:37+00:00): Cordial saludo y gracias por su contribución. Esta carretera (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495336944) ya habia sido añadida por usted mismo como way 444180948. Por favor borre el duplicado y asegúrese de haber descargado el area de trabajo en JOSM antes de subir tracks. Gracias.
TheDutchMan13 (2017-05-23 13:44:51+00:00): Reverted due to unknown errors http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48917779
TheDutchMan13 (2017-05-23 13:48:37+00:00): Reverted due to unknown errors http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48917779
nammala (2017-05-24 05:14:47+00:00): Hi Hao Duong,

May I know the reason behind changing the type of place from town to village and quarter.

Best Regards,
nammala
mueschel (2017-05-28 10:53:58+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded  many objects with very strange tags here, like these:

addr:place 	02050
building 	tran thanh toan
highway 	dhok
landuse 	16092737352
place 	0340302730
shop 	56/26

This looks like something went wrong during an import. Can this be reverted?
Jan
TheDutchMan13 (2017-05-23 21:27:49+00:00): Reverted due to unknown errors http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48929179
user_5359 (2017-05-23 07:43:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
mapper999 (2017-05-23 19:12:16+00:00): Hallo kaltuna,
ich bin mir eigentlich ziemlich sicher, dass der Parkplatz größer ist als das jetzt eingezeichnete Parkdeck.
Viele Grüße
mapper999
kaltuna (2017-05-24 03:35:14+00:00): Hallo, ich bin mir ganz sicher, dass es diese Größe hat. Das östlich eingezeichnete Gebäudestück, auf dem die Fahrstraße von der Lyoner Straße entlangführt, ist nicht mal ein Gebäude, sondern eine Rampe aufs Dach. Ich habe es aber mal als Gebäudeteil belassen. Der westlich abgesetzte Gebäudeteil ist kein Parkdeck mehr, sondern eher ein Dach. Darunter befinden sich auch Stellflächen und so wie ich das erkannt habe auch Garagen.
mapper999 (2017-05-25 11:57:55+00:00): Hallo,
die Größe des Parkdecks ist in Ordnung (man kann natürlich drüber streiten, ob die Rampe ein Teil des Gebäudes oder eine Brücke ist, das ist mir aber ziemlich egal), mir ging es um die Größe des Parkplatzes. Wie du richtig bemerkst hast, befinden sich noch weitere Parkplätze außerhalb des Parkdecks. Daher würde ich das Parkdeck (als Gebäude) und den eigentlichen Parkplatz trennen.
kaltuna (2017-05-26 03:55:27+00:00): Ja das kannst Du gerne tun
mavl (2018-12-25 20:13:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:33:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:34:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:32:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:23:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:31:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].