piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rskedgell (2022-09-22 07:09:02+00:00): When you add separate footways/sidewalks to roads, would you mind adding the tag sidewalk:both=separate (or sidewalk:left/sidewalk:right as appropriate) to the road as well? Pedestrian routing software should be able to use that information to avoid using the carriageway.

Thanks!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk#Separately_mapped_sidewalks
Derick Rethans (2022-10-06 10:52:26+00:00): IMO, these new ways should not have been added at all, but instead just the tags on the roads should be there. These new ways hint at that these paths are separate from the road, and they are not, and they indicate only that you can cross at certain points, which is not a think in the UK. This now needs a massive review as it also misses other connections from already existing roads (like Donnington Road with the King Edward Park).
rskedgell (2023-01-17 11:33:42+00:00): @Derick I've started threads about these in Talk-GB and Talk-GB-London, if you'd like to join in.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125705132
rskedgell (2023-01-18 15:05:26+00:00): Also just noticed: a correctly mapped puffin crossing n1674808373 deleted and replaced by n9995372381 (crossing=marked).
maraf24 (2022-10-08 20:43:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091298565
Dawny zakład ogrodniczy, możliwe, że Zieleni Miejskiej.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:26:07+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9995341507/history
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-05 00:11:10+00:00): porque adicionou isto aqui? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091301872
user_5359 (2022-09-03 12:06:29+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/84192817. what ist the meaning of the tag 5=3?
vasony (2022-09-17 19:43:41+00:00): I reverted your edit, Germanus Gyula park is the other side of the park, where the memorial is located,
Frans S (2022-09-03 10:25:57+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.

 Overlapping buildings drawn.

 Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
I have to revert your mappings because it cost more time to adjust them rather than map them from scratch

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125706145
bxl-forever (2022-09-03 15:38:31+00:00): Nice work but a footway with an open end, not connected to anything, trigger errors on the map.

I suppose there is a door there: I suggest connecting the footway to the building and add "entrance=yes" on the node.  (Or other values, depending whether it is publicly accessible, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance)
jonashoffmann (2022-09-08 10:55:24+00:00): Hey, he visto que has añadido bicycle=no. Esta etiqueta se utiliza para expresar que no se permite el ciclismo, no si es posible o no. creo que no es prohibida alli.
mejor usar mtb:scale=2? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
Saludos, Jonas
pvp (2022-09-04 18:32:09+00:00): Здравствуйте. А зачем вы поменяли очертания landuse? Раньше они были нанесены по картам лесничеств и отражали именно то, какая территория закреплена за "Брянском-18" и военной частью. Эта территория больше по площади, чем собственно городок и часть.
Mazda05 (2022-09-04 18:57:00+00:00): Указанная вами местность восстановлена как military=danger_area https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14542937
eggie (2022-09-03 20:52:30+00:00): Dag just.. Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo.. tenminste als er niet gefietst mag worden en een ruiterverbod geldt.

mvg
eggie
justb (2022-09-04 15:17:14+00:00): Hoi Eggie, Bedankt, had al tijd niet meer gemapped.
Is zandpaadje over heide, kom daar vaak. Maar, net als alle bospaden daar, moet ik fiets-toegang opnieuw bekijken. Ruiters sowieso niet.
eggie (2022-09-04 15:30:54+00:00): Ha Just... Je OSM werk lag 7 jaar stil, maar ik schat in je zo kennende dat je vast wel iets met kaarten hebt gedaan :)

Groetjes en wellicht in het nieuwe jaar bij Dudok.


Groet
eggie
Frans S (2022-09-19 10:50:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).

* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125707080
LuxuryCoop (2022-09-02 23:54:17+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
Futur3r (2022-09-03 13:59:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-ce que tu pourrais documenter tes changesets avec des commentaires s'il te plaît.

Merci, bonne carto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125707961
aetius (2022-09-03 18:09:45+00:00): Bonjour
concernant le secteur encadré sur la carte OSM j'ai effectivement noté pas mal de choses : 
1 - création de sentes qui ne figuraient pas sur la carte comme le "sangle d'Arguille" 
2 - insertion des symboles "falaise" qui ne figuraient pas (réclamation permanente des gens qui trouvent OSM insuffisamment descriptif sur ce sujet) 
3 - suppression de sentes qui n'existent plus et ont été condamnées par le parc de Chartreuse (sur Pravouta par ex) 
4 - correction de trajectoires de sentes non conformes aux photos satellites IGN (telle la route de l'Océpée) et parfois à la simple réalité 
Bonne carto aussi
Futur3r (2022-09-03 18:59:59+00:00): Merci pour le retour, c'est sûr que c'est important pour les gros changesets.

Mais même pour les petits, rien que de mettre "corrections diverses", "MaJ de ..", etc .. permet au moins de connaître le type de modifications faites.

A+
aetius (2022-09-03 19:14:45+00:00): Ok mais 
- je ne sais pas comment annoter et où 
- on ne va pas surcharger avec des annotations toute création ou mise à jour ...
Futur3r (2022-09-11 11:07:32+00:00): C'est sûr que ce n'est pas facile à chaque fois mais comme je te l'ai dit un simple commentaire "correction", "ajout", "mise à jour de ..." pour les petites changeset sont le minimum.
Pour les plus gros, juste l'intention générale suffit comme "Mise à Jour du massif des ... après passage sur place", ...

Et si, il faut commenter les changesets, ce n'est pas un surplus de données, c'est un mécanisme très fortement recommandé à la limite de l'obligation.

Voir -> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Faites_de_bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125707961
MiroJanosik (2022-09-10 12:24:27+00:00): Ahoj, asi to potrebuje opravu, jeden bod koľaje  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/832209863
ide pod divným uhlom a cez domy a školu.
user_13006008 (2022-09-05 01:03:46+00:00): Hello,  I'm a local mapper around here.

Can you tell me more about "Kaart Ground Survey 2022"? Does "ground survey" mean the data source is collected directly from ground surveying?
Toddtodd (2022-09-06 13:42:35+00:00): That's correct. We put cameras on a car and I drove in this area collecting footage with a local editor and making changes based on what we saw while we're there.
RVR015 (2022-09-16 22:52:21+00:00): Hi Matthew! Can you explain the purpose of Way: 146018637? Thank you so much!
MatthewAndersonUS80 (2022-09-17 18:43:10+00:00): Hello. Thanks for pointing that out. It does seem rather redundant, so I have taken the liberty of removing it.
legofahrrad (2022-09-18 10:14:34+00:00): Auch hier bitte keine beschreibenden Namen; die angenommenen Materialien zum Recyclen sind bereits korrekt erfasst.
Cycleguy13 (2022-09-19 08:03:08+00:00): Oh das wusste ich nicht. Schade, weil OSMAnd die Materialien nicht anzeigt und entsprechend nicht danach gesucht werden kann.
highflyer74 (2022-09-19 09:44:28+00:00): @Cycleguy13: doch, das funktioniert: suche mal per Lupe nach Abfall oder Recycling, dann bekommst du eine Liste, an deren oberen Ende die Kategorie "Abfallverwertung" steht. Wenn du die auswählst, kannst du oben rechts Filter auswählen und die Anzeige auf die von dir gewünschten Features einschränken.

Auch ein Klick auf einen gemappten Container zeigt diese an. Du musst nur (wie bei allen Dingen) einmal "hochziehen", damit du die Details siehst. Ich hoffe, das war verständlich ausgedrückt, sonst schreib' mich gern nochmal per PN an.

Viele Grüße!
legofahrrad (2022-09-18 10:12:34+00:00): Moin,
wieso hast du hier "Blumen" gelöscht?
Erst erstellt, dann zwei Tage später gelöscht und direkt wieder einen neuen Punkt erstellt?
Viele Grüße
Cycleguy13 (2022-09-19 17:01:35+00:00): war am falschen ort, bin dran vorbeigefahren
Hridoy Faridi (2022-09-02 18:16:22+00:00): <p>There are some natural products that can sometimes be useful for men who suffer from low libido or erectile dysfunction. The list of these products claiming to be aphrodisiacs or “boosters” of sexual performance is therefore endless, but there are only a few products for which we have scientific proof of their effectiveness today.Natural erectile dysfunction remedies which ones boost your libido </p><a href="https://moneysupermarket.live/natural-remedies-for-erectile-dysfunction/" title="Please Follow The Link">Follow the link</a>
SekeRob (2022-09-03 06:56:10+00:00): Wiki for Prominence says it's an abandoned feature proposal i.e DNU. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/key:prominence

quote
""this property is not suited for adding to OSM because it is

"computable based on suitable external data."
"practically non-verifiable except by computing it based on suitable external data."

The absence of a link to documentation of the tag is telling.

Just FYI
habi (2023-06-15 08:11:47+00:00): Du hast hier das ganze Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255915362 zu einem Restaurant gemacht.
Da das Gebäude so gross ist, würde ich ein allfälliges Restaurant da drin als einzelnen Knoten erfasst.
Hast du noch mehr Informationen über das Restaurant?
emersonveenstra (2022-09-03 01:21:17+00:00): Hi,

Unfortunatly we will need to revert this changeset, you are strictly forbidden from using any part of Google maps, including streetview. see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google for more information.
emersonveenstra (2022-09-03 01:22:53+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125720144
habi (2023-06-15 08:16:57+00:00): Ein Ofenhaus ist besser als `building=bakehouse` erfasst als einfach 'Altes Ofenhaus' in den Namen zu packen.
Ich habe das dementsprechend angepasst.
habi (2023-06-15 08:19:04+00:00): Hier ebenfalls; `building=bakehouse` ist besser :)
Adikso (2022-09-02 19:19:59+00:00): Thanks for adding your restaurant to OSM. Could you add opening hours? 

The format might not be the most obvious, but the simplest example would be "Mo-Fr 10:00-19:00; Sa-Su 15:00-20:00"
Which means open 10:00-19:00 Monday-Friday and 15:00-20:00 Saturday-Sunday.
Adikso (2022-09-02 19:26:50+00:00): You can also use generator for opening hours: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
chris66 (2023-06-09 17:40:34+00:00): way 32634389 :

Ist der Weg denn als Fußweg beschildert oder gar nicht? Falls gar nicht wäre es besser als path zu taggen und Fahrräder dürfen drüber fahren....
Jo321 (2023-06-13 15:45:36+00:00): Der Weg ist komplett nicht beschildert. 

Das ist ein Gehweg außerorts mit 1,6 m Breite, der vom Kreisverkehr kommt und der B29 Richtung Gmünd folgt.

In Richtung Kleingärten wäre es ein linksseitiger Geh-Radweg. Die vorgeschriebene Mindestbreite als Geh-/Radweg ist da weit unterschritten. Es kann so gesehen nach meinem derzeitigen Verständnis eigentlich kein Radweg sein.
Jo321 (2023-06-13 15:46:40+00:00): Unabhängig davon ist diese Trasse bei BaWü RadKultur als Zielradweg ausgewiesen. Leider ist die dazugehörige Karte nicht mehr online.
habi (2023-06-15 08:28:45+00:00): Das Gebäude ist schon seit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45080636 als Ofenhaus markiert.
Bitte verwende *nicht* den Namen um Dinge zu kennzeichnen.

Gruss aus dem Liebefeld,
habi
Hungerburg (2022-09-03 20:29:10+00:00): Hello Jorisbo, Welcome to Innsbruck. I'd like to make you aware, that we have a great Terrain Model, this should be available in your editor too, something like Tiris DGM or so.  After your edit, way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116916036 forms a very nice arch; but to make it look like that on the ground, some construction work would be needed.
Hungerburg (2022-09-03 21:10:37+00:00): Also there is no T-intersection 20m above, so I reverted the geometries there. From the aerial alone you just cannot see below the trees and even with the terrain model you would not be able to tell.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-17 15:39:39+00:00): Hello!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243551662/history - is changing surface to surface=y intentional here? If yes, what you meant by that?
JassKurn (2023-04-17 17:38:04+00:00): Thankyou. The tag was a mistake. I've fixed the tags in changeset - 135025739
JassKurn (2023-04-17 17:39:22+00:00): Just to clarify, it should have been surface=asphalt, and I left out smoothness=intermediate
mcliquid (2022-09-04 05:38:56+00:00): Hallo Leander, du hast dieses Teilstück der A2 in "Südautobahn" umbenannt, obwohl alle anderen Teile "Süd Autobahn" heißen. Selbst die ASFINAG spricht von der "Süd Autobahn", siehe Liste hier: https://www.asfinag.at/verkehr-sicherheit/webcams/
Oder Wikipedia hier: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%BCd_Autobahn

Würdest du das bitte wieder korrigieren? Vielen Dank!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125711844
user_13006008 (2022-09-03 09:22:17+00:00): Apparently, there is a new proposal to mass delete service=driveway2 on OSM-talk mailing list.

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-September/087734.html
user_5359 (2022-09-04 13:17:06+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1091338204/history. Don‘t use the misspelling of building to add  comment for a building.
Adedewe Abiodun (2022-09-05 08:14:56+00:00): Okay. Thank yo very much for your reply.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
mcliquid (2022-09-04 05:44:10+00:00): Hallo Leander, du hast hier die B50 von highway=primary in highway=unclassified geändert. Im WebGIS des Burgenlandes ist von dieser Änderung in der Klassifizierung nichts zu sehen, dort ist die Bundesstraße durchgehend. 
Siehe: https://gis.bgld.gv.at/WebGIS/externalcall.jsp?project=GeoDaten&x=762588.5505842008&y=261460.01207772404&scale=25000&rotation=0&view=standard_extern&basemapview=gk_katasterkarte_extern&user=guest&group_id=public&client=core&language=de

Hast du eine andere offizielle Quelle deiner Änderung?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125712192
eggie (2022-09-03 08:10:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
maikelonline (2022-09-03 10:03:59+00:00): Dankjewel, ik zal mij dit weekend inlezen en voorlopig ook geen aanpassingen maken per telefoon. Ietsje ontoegankelijker.
Frans S (2022-09-03 12:12:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).

I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125712240
Frans S (2022-09-30 12:28:42+00:00): Hello Again.
You added residential areas and mapped them through buildings and connected them as well on highways and other features. Be more accurate please
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125712240
eggie (2022-09-03 06:34:16+00:00): Dag Maikel... 
We gebruiken name= Dijkgraafplein braakliggend terrein
alleen voor officieel gebruikte namen. Dus niet om iets te omschrijven.

Een braakliggend terrein dat ligt te wachten kun je gewoon als landuse=grass (surface=unpaved hoort niet op een node en zal vast niet hier) invullen net als de aangelegde paadjes, bankjes en het schaakbord.
De naam= en surface=..  zal ik verwijderen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-03 06:40:12+00:00): Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dchess

en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbench

Let er ook goed op dat je geen officiele adresnodes verwijderd. Een bedrijf vedwijnt, maar een adres blijft achter.  In dit geval was het geen officieel adres. 
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-09-03 06:51:49+00:00): Je 'braakliggend' terrein. heb ik als voorbeeld even ingevuld.
Braakliggend is het allang niet meer. 
Wellicht kan de node van de speeltoestellen nog verplaatst worden?

MVG
eggie
maikelonline (2022-09-03 19:12:30+00:00): Dankjewel voor de tips. Het terrein wordt in de volks/politieke mond "Braakliggend terrein" genoemd en later nog een knappe naam krijgen.  Ik snap de edits.
eggie (2022-09-03 19:20:37+00:00): Hoi...
Wanneer het in de volksmond Braakliggend terrein wordt gemoemd kun je dit als loc_name=...  invoeren. Bv op de omtrek van het gras.

Je zou ook nog een losse transparante laag  los over het geheel kunnen leggen met leisure=park. 
Dan zou je ook daar de loc_name op kunnen zetten.
Wel een twijfelgeval of het een park is.
Up to you...
Mapse
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
mcliquid (2022-09-04 05:48:01+00:00): Hallo Leander,
dieser Changeset Kommentar ist leider nicht sehr aussagekräftig. Schaust du dir mal diese Wikiseite dazu an? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Vielen Dank!
Frans S (2022-09-03 12:39:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125712375
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Frans S (2022-09-03 12:27:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).

Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building and squared with the Q key



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125712970