piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Dawid2849 (2022-11-23 17:47:00+00:00): source=https://s1-myslowice-bielsko.pl
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:23:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Sanniu (2026-03-30 07:41:28+00:00): Hi, can you add street name to address https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480075379 to facilitate search?
Langlaeufer (2022-11-23 17:58:50+00:00): ja, das kommt schon eher hin!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129292017
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:51:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:09:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:07:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
trigpoint (2022-11-25 12:00:53+00:00): Whilst not 'normal', there is no legal restriction on U turns here.

Turn restrictions should reflect only legal restrictions.

Cheers Phil
Bolt010 (2022-12-01 07:50:44+00:00): Hello Trigpoint,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I will analyze your suggestion and proceed with edits accordingly.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:17:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Discostu36 (2022-11-24 14:22:07+00:00): Das sind ja wohl nicht wirklich alles einzelne Hotels? Außerdem bitte Quelle und sinnvolle Änderungssatzkommentare angeben.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:25:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:14:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
gscholz (2022-11-24 08:09:59+00:00): Hi,
I have reverted this changeset as it created self intersecting ways:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129293462

Kind regards
Guido
HellMap (2022-11-26 16:30:16+00:00): Sveiki!

Par `place=island`, piemēram https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116609522/history. Ja tās ir maziņas saliņas, tad tās gandrīz vienmēr būs `place=islet`.

Šajā vietā izskatās pēc putras ar salām, bet te viss (varbūt izņemot Lāču salu) izskatās pēc islet. Latviski gan tas viss is "salas", tāpēc nesakrīt ar OSM izpratni, kur līdz kādam kvadrātkilometram par "īstu" salu neskaitās.

Paldies!
Frans S (2022-11-24 11:45:54+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
When you map hedges, and a road is visible between the hedges, please map them as well.
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129293716
Frans S (2022-11-24 11:35:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark.
Tagging of settlements. 
When you map an area around a settlement, just tag it as landuse=residential.
Tag barrier=hedge is not required.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129293935
Fizzie-DWG (2024-08-08 23:42:08+00:00): Reverted by DWG for incorrect mapping

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/155000661
Frans S (2022-11-24 11:31:37+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
About tagging of settlements.
A settlemen need to be tagged with a single node, tagged as place=.....
When it is a larger inhabited area, you can tag an area and tag it as landuse=residential.
Bes regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129294109
trigpoint (2022-11-25 12:20:55+00:00): Again why?

There is no turn restriction here.

Cheers Phil
Bolt010 (2022-12-01 07:47:47+00:00): Hello Trigpoint,
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I will analyze your suggestion and proceed with edits accordingly.
Hufkratzer (2022-11-24 22:30:54+00:00): Hi,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116614678 doesn't look like a riding centre (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure=horse_riding, iD preset name "Centro ecuestre"), it looks like a riding arena (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure=pitch#Pista_de_equitación, iD preset name "Picadero"); compare example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015428698
silversurfer83 (2022-11-26 19:27:13+00:00): Hi
die Werte, die einem Schlüssel (key) zugeweisen werden, sind praktisch immer (britisches) Englisch. Daher gehört hier bei "office=" statt architekturbüro der Ausdruck "architect" (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Darchitect)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129295418
MarcoR (2022-11-25 22:55:09+00:00): Ciao, ho corretto la mappatura del tuo negozio; consiglierei di aggiungere un numero di telefono e gli orari di apertura.

Buon mapping,
Marco.
NorthCrab (2022-11-23 20:21:17+00:00): Jak dla mnie to punkt powinien znajdować się w centrum strefy, aniżeli mapowanie pod aplikacje. Dodatkowo, wygląda że tekst o którym mówisz nie jest generowany przez ten punkt a bardziej przez tą relację: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/130919, która sama tworzy napis na środku strefy.
NorthCrab (2022-11-23 20:22:14+00:00): Nie podoba mi się ta zmiana.
maraf24 (2022-11-24 00:23:22+00:00): Zgadza się, nie wpływa to na rendering na mapie podstawowej.
Hufkratzer (2022-11-24 22:51:12+00:00): Hi,
you have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116626580 with leisure=horse_riding (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding), but this object does not look like a riding centre, it looks like horse walker (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:animal=horse_walker).
8err (2022-11-25 15:48:13+00:00): Hi, I only know it has something to do with horse. If you understand that better, you are probably right.
Hufkratzer (2022-11-26 12:32:43+00:00): I have retagged the object; as horse walker; a horse walker also has to do with horses. The horse walker is listed on https://www.ppstables.cz/areal/ as "oválný kolotoč pro 14 koní". Tagging a horse walker as a riding centre because it is located in a riding centre seems to me like tagging a fitness_station as a park because it is located in a park. You wouldn't do that, would you?
BestestGuy (2026-06-29 18:59:29+00:00): Zdravim, vidim že jste změnil cestu 215474128 z highway=track na highway=service, ale za mě uplně nevypadá jako service, protože afaik, highway=service jsou krátke cesty aby se člověk k něčemu dostal, zatímco tahle je dost dlouha a nevede uplně k něčemu konkrétnímu... Chápu to špatně, nebo jde o chybu? Díky :)
emersonveenstra (2022-11-23 22:45:46+00:00): Hi,

This won't work, it's not a valid use of a road route. The best thing to do is probably connect the driveway to your house (where the driveway meets the garage door or main entrance).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129295719
ElectricK (2022-11-24 13:50:11+00:00): Gracias, I have made your suggested edits in a new change set.  Thank you for the review.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129295719
Piskvor (2022-11-24 09:55:14+00:00): Please do not delete buildings that were mapped correctly: the single node that you added instead was not an adequate replacement. Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129316513
jeslop (2022-11-23 22:35:21+00:00): Reverted on changeset #129299802.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
ALu68 (2022-11-23 21:36:35+00:00): Dieser Parkplatz ist aber nicht Typ "parking=street_side" .

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499439883

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:parking=street%20side?uselang=de
Frans S (2022-11-24 11:24:36+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark about tagging of settlements.
A settlement needs to be tagged with a single node, tagged with place- ....
You tagged the surrounding areas wrongly. They can be tagged as landuse=residential.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129296173
limes11 (2022-11-23 21:59:07+00:00): Hi, 

die Änderung an 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1000462206

ist inkorrekt. Der Laden existiert weiterhin. Ich hatte das am WE bearbeitet (siehe Historie) und einen expliziten Hinweis  hinterlassen. Keine Ahnung, was der GA schreibt, ist hinter eine Paywall. 

VG, Limes
limes11 (2022-11-23 22:07:35+00:00): Hab's repariert
LateNightTone (2022-11-24 15:01:10+00:00): Hey Openallhours, thanks for this edit.
Not a criticism, but a tip - when removing roads from use, rather than deleting the way, it's better to update the highway=* tag to disused:highway=* (or demolished:highway=* if you know the road has been entirely removed), rather than deleting the way. This is because aerial imagery still shows that the road exists, and leaving the line in place with this tag clarifies for other editors that the road should not be reinstated on openstreetmap. Roads with the disused: etc tags are not rendered on the openstreetmap.org mapping, or in GPS software, so it just remains as a reminder to editors in case someone comes along, sees the road in imagery and tries to add it back.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix for more information.

After the demolished: ways have been around a while, I tend to only delete them once at least one of the aerial image sets is updated to show that the road is now gone.
map per (2022-11-26 11:30:18+00:00): Just for documenting what happened here:
Most of this changeset was reverted by Soshal Distan Singh
map per (2022-11-26 11:28:58+00:00): Just for documenting what happened here:
This changeset was reverted by Soshal Distan Singh
map per (2022-11-26 11:27:38+00:00): Just for documenting what happened here:
This changeset was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129382932 by Soshal Distan
map per (2022-11-26 11:26:54+00:00): Just for documenting what happened here:
This changeset was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129383025 by Soshal Distan
MxxCon (2022-11-26 01:07:10+00:00): Hello.
When adding max height tag, the road should be split so that tag gets applied only the relevant section of the road, not the whole street. 👍🙂
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129296835
syntex (2022-12-16 21:35:32+00:00): Podjazdy tego typu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1053648197 powinny mieć jeszcze service=driveway
NorthCrab (2022-12-17 10:02:32+00:00): Pododawałem driveway w rejonie tych budynków - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130181070
NorthCrab (2022-12-17 10:08:17+00:00): Witaj, ten odcinek drogi ma oznaczony 1 lane (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1116633696/history) a powinny być dwa https://i.imgur.com/i058WKx.png. Trzeba na całej długości poprawić chyba. Trzeba potem dodać embedded_rails=tram (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:embedded_rails). Przykład mapowania tego przypadku znajdziesz tutaj: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.22000/21.01297 Tylko nie nakładaj na siebie linii 1:1 bo potem ciężko się z tego korzysta (jak zaraz się przekonasz xd), rozdzielone tak jak teraz jest super.
starsep (2023-01-21 13:46:46+00:00): Mam wątpliwości do https://osm.org/way/1116633692 oraz https://osm.org/way/1116633693
To zdaje się jest trambuspas?
1. name=BUS do zmienienia
2. access=no nie zezwala też na autobusy, więc przydałoby się psv=designated lub bus=designated
3. Nie wiem czy tu powinny być osobne linie na autobusy/tramwaje czy wspólna + łaczniki
Frans S (2022-12-03 10:07:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please read and follow the tagging info on this linked document.
Decision tree, which tag to be used for roads
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S48CEVi3yiAYWhIJu57jtLyv0ZVUbGwJ/view?usp=share_link
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines

 How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.
Best regards
evod (2023-06-20 06:54:36+00:00): Hi!
I believe that connecting the barrier to the road (i.e. that they have a common node) is problematic for usage of OSM data in routing. So I would prefer removing the common node, or only mapping the retaining wall on both sides (as I would argue is the case in the real world). What are your thoughts on this? 
All the best, evod
Rainero (2022-11-25 21:08:04+00:00): Hallo ticki_52,  
in diesem und wahrscheinlich weiteren Änderungssätzen hast du eine Menge doppelter Punkte erzeugt (Punkte, die an derselben Position übereinander liegen). In dem Kartenausschnitt, den ich vorhin im JOSM geladen hatte, habe ich ca. 120 solche Doubletten  zwischen Backnang und Steinbach bereinigt, aber in der Gegend gibt es viel mehr: https://ibb.co/B2hfPtx  

Eigentlich setzt der iD-Editor gemeinsame Punkte, wenn man eine Landuse-Fläche entlang einer anderen zeichnet. Hast du evtl. Landuse-Flächen markiert und versehentlich die Taste "d" gedrückt? Das würde die gemeinsamen Punkte zu solchen Punkt-Pärchen machen. Man braucht das nur, wenn man zwei Flächen trennen will, weil man z.B. etwas dazwischen einfügen will.  
Es wäre gut, wenn du der Ursache auf den Grund gehst, denn wie man sieht, wimmelt es in der Gegend nur so von doppelten Punkten.  

Viele Grüße,
Rainer

Hier noch der Link zu Osmose, es kann aber evtl. etwas dauern bis alle Marker im Kartenausschnitt angezeigt werden: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=15&lat=48.94556&lon=9.46914&item=1010,1050,1060,1070,1090,1110,1120,1140,1150,1180,1190,1200,1210,1221,1230,1250,1260,1270,1280,1290,2xxx,3xxx,4xxx,5xxx,6020,6030,6040,7xxx,8xxx,9000,9001,9002,9003,9004,9005,9006,9007,9009,9010,9011,9014,9015,9016,9017,9018,9019,9020&level=1,2,3&tags=geom&fixable=
ticki_52 (2022-11-25 23:21:15+00:00): Hallo Rainero,

mea culpa... die Ursache des Gewimmels ist klar: 
die Dubletten kommen durch mein Lösen von verklebten Highways mit Landuse-fächen. (Dieses Verkleben ist eine Seuche, die UNBEDINGT gestoppt werden sollte.) Aktuell gibt es Situationen, wo man ohne Lösen der Nodes kaum mehr an die Highways kommt. (Manchmal sind 2 oder 3 Wegkreuzungen und ebensoviele Flächen an einem Node verklebt. Da muss man für Änderungen sogar Löschungen von Teilstrecken der betroffenen Highways durchführen, um die Änderung durchführen zu können. Und wenn man dabei nicht aufpasst, dann beschädigt man womöglich Routen-Relationen und merkt es nicht.) 
Nach meinen Änderungen verklebe ich die landuses nicht wieder. So bleibt das Gemappte übersichtlich und man kann Änderungen viel einfacher durchziehen.

Ich werde die Dubletten nach und nach abarbeiten.

Wäre das aus Deiner Sicht ok so?

Grüßle ticki_52
Rainero (2022-11-26 13:15:53+00:00): Ah, danke, dem Entkleben von linienförmigen und flächigen Elementen kann ich nur beipflichten. Das erschwert die weitere Bearbeitung oder produziert auch unbeabsichtigte Fehler.  
Somit ist die Ursache geklärt :)  
Mir scheint, iD warnt nicht bei doppelten Landuse-Punkten. Bin nicht der iD-Spezialist, vielleicht kennt jemand eine Möglichkeit? Daher, denke ich, hast du das nicht bemerkt.  

Danke auch für die schnelle Antwort und das Abarbeiten. Vielleicht schnappe ich mir auch noch ein paar.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
ticki_52 (2022-11-27 09:33:23+00:00):  Hallo Rainero,
 
danke für die Unterstützung. Ist doch schon einiges an Schioefständen aufgelaufen in letzter Zeit. Dafür muss ich um Nachsicht bitten. Ich hatte ein OSM-Projektchen, welches mir wichtig ist, aufwandsmäßig doch etwas unterschätzt.... Da blieb die Fehlerbereinigung halt liegen. Im JOSM werden die "Doppelpunkte" aufgezeigt und dort sind diese Fehlerchen auch schnell behoben. Ist halt etwas stumpfsinnig, aber wenn man nach dem Trennen der verklebten Wege und Flächn das übersichtliche Mapping sieht, hat sich der Aufwand gelohnt...
 
Einen schönen Sonntag wünsche ich
 
Grüße ticki_52
abakus_uploader (2022-11-23 23:32:10+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SekeRob (2022-11-24 19:12:53+00:00): Hi,

Weeeell, you changed this one, but not the other 2 with the same 'typo', so I fixed that this morning since a soundex flag was raised. Now all 3 are same and correct.

ciao
VLD526 (2022-12-16 11:28:10+00:00): I agree.
I have only encountered this typo once in my challenges, otherwise I would have corrected it in the other occurrencies as well.
Thank you.
mappinglander (2022-11-30 14:33:43+00:00): Merhabalar,
Yapmış olduğunuz gerçek dışı düzenlemeleri geri almak zorunda aldım. Uydu fotoğraflarına göre orada bir otoyol yok, ne de bu şekilde alanlar. Lütfen gerçekte ne varsa onu haritalayın, planlanan ve/veya sadece kadastroda var olan şeyler değil.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-30 20:04:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77383331/history

I see that you have changed name

has it started being used again? is building=vacant accurate there?
EdLoach (2026-03-31 10:46:20+00:00): I think it is still vacant. It has outline planning permission to be converted to flats https://idox.tendringdc.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=SJWDWXQB0RE00
and what looks to be an old outstanding application for redevelopment https://idox.tendringdc.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=summary&keyVal=R3DT2DQB0EL00
I'll try and drive down there at some point and check. Most recent Mapillary image is September 2024 though I walked past it last August and it was still empty then. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=904175351560595
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-11-24 01:26:43+00:00): you substituted the building drawing for a plot contour drawing, that is wrong, the building tag goes to a building object, not a land use object.
eggie (2022-11-24 06:53:10+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk.

Ziet er verder netjes uit. 

Het 'hokje'waar je kaartjes koopt is geen leisure=pitch  Ik heb het teuggezet naar building.
name= heb ik omgezet naar description.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-24 06:40:42+00:00): Dag Paul...  Van deze actie begrijp ik helemaal niets.

Je verplaatst alleen maar adresnodes. Je edits zijn ongeloofwaardig. 
Zie.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129299029
Ik draai je wijzigingen terug.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-24 06:41:42+00:00): reverted by changeset #129308528
Paul_Palmpje (2022-11-24 06:47:26+00:00): Sorry, hier is blijkbaar iets misgegaan.
eggie (2022-11-24 06:54:40+00:00): Geeft niet.. Het staat weer terug.. Ik kijk even je edits na. Het gaat best goed.
Let wel op dat je niet tagging gebruikt om bepaalde effecten te krijgen. Dat heet taggen voor de renderer.
name=  niet gebruiken voor functies.

Mapse
eggie
mmis-berg (2023-07-01 16:14:37+00:00): Der eine Hydrant auf dem Sportplatz ist klar. Aber wo genau befindet sich der zweite Hydrant? Momentan ist er auf den Gleisen eingezeichnet, was vermutlich ein Fehler ist.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-11-24 19:32:39+00:00): Hi!

The golfcart paths and footpaths should be connected to the rest of the road network otherwise it could create incorrect routings in routing engines (these are called unconnected islands). I don't know if it would be best to remove them all or to create artificial road connections... I'll let you decide.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-11-24 19:33:14+00:00): (Writing in english for other users, but feel free to answer in french)
Nadeaua (2022-11-25 01:29:16+00:00): Salut!
Je viens de finir le Club de golf Vaudreuil. Pour le problème des chemins non connectés, j'ai opté pour l'option des InformalPath, je pense que c'est la meilleure solution.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-11-25 03:25:24+00:00): Parfait!
tordans (2022-11-25 07:37:29+00:00): Hallo F_L_54321, danke, dass du mithilfst bei OpenStreetMap! Für deine Änderung müssen wir noch etwas nacharbeiten.

Es gibt nämlich weitere Tags, die man aktualisieren muss, wenn man die "maxspeed" ändert. In diesem Fall ist das zum Beispiel "zone:maxspeed=DE:30". Er gibt die Quelle der "maxspeed" Angabe an. Bspw. an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1016203846 sind die Tags jetzt nicht mehr passend (50 <> DE:30).

Ich habe das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129354936 korrigiert und ein kleines Segment, das in der Mitte vergessen wurde auch angepasst.

Schau gerne nochmal, ob das so passt.

Viele Grüße!