piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
redd (2021-07-27 18:32:03+00:00): Hi Ze0zohk1,
in der Tat fehlte das umschließende Gebäude. Ich dachte vorher, dass auch ein "anflanschen" funktionieren würde. Das wäre toll gewesen, um den Mappingaufwand für diese Art von Fehlern, in denen Teilbauten als eigene building=yes erfasst worden sind, in Grenzen zu halten und schnell zu korrigieren. 
Habe nun die Außenlinie des Hauses um den Teilbau gelegt und dem Teilbau eine zusätzliche divergierende Eigenschaft (building:levels=1) gegeben.
Danke dir und Grüße, 
redd
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-27 18:40:25+00:00): Hallo redd,

vielen dank fürs Korrigieren! Ich war mal so frei und hab noch eine Relation dafür angelegt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108704741

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
eggie (2021-07-27 05:43:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-27 16:16:12+00:00): Hello simonschaufi,

can you next time split your changeset to cover only smaller regions?

Next to the bar you added is another bar (www.osm.org/node/2449594407). Are you node and the other one maybe the same bar?

Cheers
simonschaufi (2021-07-27 16:24:53+00:00): Hi, I use maps.me for creating new nodes but editing nodes is a nightmare in this app and often even not possible at all. Many bars and restaurants don't exist any more and I was not able to delete the outdated info within the app which I wanted to do later directly in osm.
eggie (2021-07-27 05:51:11+00:00): Lijkt me prima zo.
Die aansluitende fietspaden zijn dan ook vast wel G13 fietspaden. Ik zal de tagging aanpassen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-07-27 06:00:37+00:00): Dag Martijn..

Dit routeert dan ook niet meer voor fietsers.
Wat is je bedoeling?
Wellicht motor_vehicle=destination ipv access=destination?

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108645577

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-27 06:06:29+00:00): Hier loopt notabene een officiële ANWB route..
Zal dat bord bestemmingsverkeer toegestaan.. parkeren niet toegestaan. ... niet gewoon bedoeld zijn voor autoverkeer?
access=destination is algemeen. Probeer specifiek te taggen.
bv motor_vehicle=destination

Ik zal in iedere geval even bicycle-yes toevoegen, want het is een officieel G11 fietspad. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-27 06:13:30+00:00): Maar bicycle-yes toegevoegd om het routeerbaar te maken ..   Dat klopt natuurlijk niet, want het is notabene een fietspad.
De bebording is volkomen onduidelijk. Voor wie bedoeld... Toch niet voor die fietsers? 
Wat zal jij doen als je op de fiets deze tekst ziet? Ik rijd hier gewoon door. 
Aan de andere kant staat een identiek bord. Lijkt me verstandig emergency=yes ook toe te voegen. 
Je zou eens moeten navragen wat er wordt bedoeld hier. :)

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-27 06:17:17+00:00): Martijn..iets anders ..  Weet jij wat Rossinilaan 52 voor een gebouw is. (Bouwjaar 1943?)
Op de luchtfoto niets te zien?
gr eggie
Martijn-VR-Gooi en Vechtstreek (2021-07-27 21:50:47+00:00): Ha Eggie,
hahaha, 
bedankt voor (al) je reactie(s),
tja, wat zal ik zeggen..........
De bewoners van huisnummer 4 , 8 en 10 moeten toch ook naar hun woningen kunnen navigeren? zij zijn het bestemmingsverkeer. En daar moet ongetwijfeld eens een hulpdienst naar toe. Vandaar de tag emergency=yes.
Daarom ook de vraag om dit te controleren, want ik weet niet of het nu zo goed/voldoende is getaged. 
tja een vraagje richting de gemeente Hilversum zou niet verkeerd zijn :-) 
Moet ik nu nog tags toevoegen of is het zoals het nu is, voldoende?

mbt Rossinilaan 52.
Ik zag op internet dat het een Rijksmonument pand/Kazemat uit WOII is. Volgens de BAGviewer bestaat het pand ook nog steeds. er wordt aan dit pand een "overige gebruiksfunctie" gegeven.
Meer weet ik er ook niet van.
Vanwaar deze vraag?

m.vr.gr.
Martijn.
eggie (2021-07-28 04:15:34+00:00): Dag Martijn..

Je zult dan nog emergency=yes moeten toevoegen of de brandweerapp moet access=destination negeren?

De kazemat zal een ondergronds gebouw zijn. Ik zie alleen maar tuinen.
Groet
Eggie
eggie (2021-07-28 06:53:41+00:00): De tagging heb ik aangepast
naar motor_vehicle=destination en emergency=yes.  Het zou anders ook niet voor wandelaars routeren.
Dat is onwaarschijnlijk. 
Nu is het gewoon een G11 fietspad. Het oostelijk deel is afgesloten met betonnen paaltjes (toegevoegd) en daar kun je dus niet met een brandweerwagen in.
De Doodweg vanuit het westen heb ik omgetagd naar highway=resiedential surface=asphalt.

Advies is dus om specifiek te tagen en niet algemeen access=destination. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-07-28 07:18:30+00:00): typo  highway=residential

Die bunker is inderdaad de Blaskowitz bunker op het voormalige 
terrein van de Joodse S. A. Rudelsheimstichting.
Een beladen stukje Hilversum. 
gr eggie
Martijn-VR-Gooi en Vechtstreek (2021-07-28 19:57:43+00:00): Ha Eggie, 
bedankt voor toelichtingen mbt tagen.

een bijzonder en beladen stukje historie. Ik las in de toelichting dat er een deel van de bunker boven de grond staat en een deel onder de grond

m.vr.gr.
Martijn.
goedegazelle (2021-07-27 09:31:35+00:00): Het vervangen van track door path is m.i. niet correct. Ik kan op de kaart duidelijk dubbele sporen zien liggen, bijvoorbeeld zuidoost van de Empese en Tondense Heide.
Plav (2021-07-27 09:41:31+00:00): Dank voor je reactie. Voor een klein stukje klopt wat je zegt, namelijk de “boog” in het pad vlak ten noorden van de informatieschuur. De rest van het pad is echt maar enkel, ben er twee weken geleden zelf langs gelopen. Wellicht was het vroeger anders, maar met flink gegroeid gras is er maar 1 spoor over op de rest van net pad.
goedegazelle (2021-07-27 10:00:32+00:00): "track" = veld- of bosweg, gebruikt door boeren en boswachters.

"path" = pad geschikt voor wandelaars, fietsers enzovoort.

De functie is het belangrijkst, daarna komt de vorm. Een toeristische route over een boerenweg is nog steeds een boerenweg (de boer is de 'hoogste' gebruiker).

Overigens zou je als je een "track" naar een "path" omzet ook de "tracktype" moeten verwijderen en vervangen door "surface" (indien mogelijk).
goedegazelle (2021-07-27 10:04:30+00:00): Onze reacties kruisten elkaar.

Ik moet zeggen dat dat gebied inderdaad vaak verandert. Het zou kunnen zijn dat de luchtfoto's achter lopen. Het is alweer enige tijd geleden dat ik zelf het gebied heb bezocht (> twee jaar).

Het wordt overigens erg gewaardeerd als mappers ter plaatse het terrein onderzoeken. Ik hoop dat mijn opmerkingen in de juiste context worden gelezen.
Plav (2021-07-27 10:11:37+00:00): Geen probleem. Als ik kijk naar de toegangsbordjes, dan is path meer op z'n plaats, het is namelijk alleen een wandelpad. Dat ook een boer daar wel eens zal komen om af en toe wat gras te maaien, dat zal ook kloppen.
Yu_llis (2021-09-10 11:58:58+00:00): Питання по дорозі з південно-західного напрямку до траверсу хребта Сивуль (лінія 962301679) — на основі чого були внесені дані зміни? 
Цієї дороги в реальності нема.
Yu_llis (2021-09-21 09:01:19+00:00): Неіснуючі дороги: лінії 961703869; 961703605
Glassman (2021-07-28 17:43:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108645874
Glassman (2021-07-28 17:44:24+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108645874
habi (2021-07-30 13:00:13+00:00): Ciao Jared

Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap, nice that you're here!

Inthis changeset you've added the dog park https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967670254/ with the tag `dog park=yes`, which is wrong.
The OSM Wiki suggests to use `leisure=dog_park`, which I did correct this to in my changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108892748

Greetings from Switzerland,
habi

PS: I came here from https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm, which I often browse to find tag typos which I aim to clean up :)
TheShiningAlbatross (2021-07-26 22:42:19+00:00): Used Mapbox Satellite Imagery (3.68; 1.78); Strava
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108646273
SOSM (2021-08-05 09:06:07+00:00): Please do not test editing applications against the production API. Use the dev sandbox: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing

Thanks!
gpserror (2021-08-08 23:02:02+00:00): Hello, unfortunately I'm not local and don't see imagery so I can't make heads or tails from this, but the current geometries do not seem to match what I'd call a normal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout - so I would refrain from using this tag in this situation - at least based on what's currently drawn.
archpdx (2021-08-08 23:47:24+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. After reading the wiki page, I've replaced junction=roundabout with just 
oneway=yes (osm.org/changeset/109367449) as this road doesn't have the right of way. You can kind of see it on Esri World Imagery; others seem to show the old traffic pattern as since this is a pretty recent change.
gpserror (2021-08-09 03:21:08+00:00): Cool, I couldn't make heads or tails from the Esri imagery so I figured you may know more about what's here at this location.  I just noticed with the validation tools that the circle wasn't completely marked with junction=roundabout and it seems the incoming road had right of way as you say, so this didn't quite fit.

Thanks for resolving.
archie (2021-07-26 22:17:06+00:00): Hej, du har "justerat/ritat" en del vägar med rätt mycket offset. Du bör - innan  du ritar - justera bildbakgrunden ordentligt. På vissa ställen var offseten rätt betydligt.
marc__marc (2023-04-11 20:50:57+00:00): Hello Jakka,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39120984
aerial imagery doesn't show "sett lanes", it's new or a typo ?
Regards,
Marc
Jakka (2023-04-12 07:31:08+00:00): Was a while ago, most of thode where
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=498963154677154
marc__marc (2023-04-20 20:37:18+00:00): Thanks. I added surface:middle=asphalt
mueschel (2021-07-29 17:19:25+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn "waterbody_number"? Diesen Tag gibt es nirgends sonst.

Die Quelle "Bing" kann auch nicht so ganz stimmen.
eggie (2021-07-27 05:48:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback:  Op reguliere wegen in de bebouwde kom hoef je niet steeds lanes=2 toe te voegen. lanes = 2 3 4  wordt meer gebruikt op snelwegen. 
Verder is BING verwouderd en ligt er vaak naast. Het beste kun je pdok actueel instellen als achtergrond.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Glassman (2021-07-28 17:46:13+00:00): #TIP: We spell out street names, ie. use Varsity Court. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you update the street name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108647064
portalaventura (2021-07-27 15:37:45+00:00): Por gentileza, corrija a Praça Aristides Miranda Brun. Sua alterção desalinhou parte das geometrias nessa praça.
RiverBearings (2021-07-27 17:29:00+00:00): Olá Portalaventura. Vou combinar o passeio e o extremo sul do parque mais precisamente com a versão anterior. Obrigado por trazer a questão da geometria para mim. Informe-me se observar alguma coisa que precise de ajuste e tratarei disso imediatamente. Tenha um bom dia.

Hello Portalaventura. I will match the footway and the southern end of the park more precisely to the previous version. Thank you for bringing up the geometry issue to me. Please let me know if you observe anything else that needs adjustment and I will make sure to address those promptly. Have a good day.
archie (2021-07-26 22:21:59+00:00): Du har i den här cs brutit multipolygonen för Hultaån. Gör skillnad mellan island och islet.
TheShiningAlbatross (2021-07-26 22:41:36+00:00): Used Mapbox Satellite Imagery (3.68; 1.78); Strava
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108647966
wireguy (2021-07-27 01:21:05+00:00): jrisv250, there are 4 pickleball courts here, not two.  Can you correct?
Luz R Finley (2024-06-14 14:30:08+00:00): I reverted the changeset 108648814 because this object doesn't need contact information.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/152682115
Glassman (2021-07-28 17:46:53+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108649204
felipeeugenio (2021-07-26 23:49:10+00:00): Hola.

Se abrió este loteo?
felipeeugenio (2021-07-26 23:48:35+00:00): Por favor no cambiar categorías de las calles. Eso no es una calle terciaria.
Voy a cambiarlo. Gracias
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 14:14:59+00:00): removido
OSMPossum (2021-07-27 00:10:19+00:00): Correction: Source used was SDFE Aerial Imagery
Martha@DT (2021-07-27 00:39:36+00:00): Review is not longer needed.
DressyPear4 (2021-07-27 22:53:07+00:00): Quando tiver algum problema ou dúvida, abra uma nota ou entre nos grupos da comunidade ao invés de excluir as informações existentes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108649702
ZLima12 (2021-08-01 19:39:57+00:00): Please try to break up your changesets into more localized areas.
Martha@DT (2021-07-27 00:39:45+00:00): Review is not longer needed.
BubbaJuice (2021-07-27 19:57:44+00:00): Hey GREGMAP1,

I saw a lot of your edits in Tucson. Thanks for adding all of the buildings. That sort of thing is important. I see you used iD. Did you know that if you press "q" it will make the buildings all right angled. If you could try that next time that would be great. Also, I would appreciate it a lot if you start using Bing Aerial Imagery for your houses. It is much better quality than the imagery you are currently using and would greatly improve the accuracy of the data. If you have any other questions, feel free to reach out & ask me.

Thank you, 
BubbaJuice
felipeeugenio (2021-08-08 21:11:18+00:00): Para un fundo quizás es mejor farmyard que industrial. Es otro concepto.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108650143
gordo anorexico (2021-08-08 23:15:54+00:00): Esa parte me tenía confundido.
ovruni (2021-07-27 20:35:52+00:00): Hola, he notado que en algunos de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado parques y se han cambiado vías con otras etiquetas a parques en lugares que no evidencian parques existentes, por lo que han sido revertidas.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
mrpulley (2021-07-27 22:17:00+00:00): Just letting you know that somehow you deleted the highway tag for Browns Creek Road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43048463 - I spotted this when updating an edit last night, so I've fixed this for you this morning.
kapazao (2021-07-28 15:13:18+00:00): Hola, por favor no añadas oneway a las rotondas, ya lo llevan implícito y es totalmente redundante.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108650634
user_5239402 (2021-07-27 03:37:17+00:00): 안녕하세요.
지하철 선로를 도로, 인도, 보도같은 지물이 연결하지 말아 주세요. 연결하면 선로의 위치를 수정할때 힘들어 집니다. 선로가 도로, 인도, 보도에 연결이 되여 있다면 보이는 즉시 연결을 모두 해제해 주시기 바랍니다.
지도m (2021-07-28 07:37:37+00:00): 죄송해요 도로를 수정중 선로가 함께 연결된듯 합니다
이제부터 더욱 주의를 기울여 제작하겠습니다
aweech (2021-07-28 00:34:01+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions.
I've been following your changesets in Tooele, and I have a question and comments. First the question, what do these tags in the atspm namespace mean? I couldn't find them in the Wiki. Next the comments.

First, the Wiki page for connectivity relations (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:connectivity#How_and_when_to_use_connectivity_relations) says that they should be used for more complex intersections, so I don't think they should be used for these simple intersections. At the very least, I've never seen them used before like this. They're really not necessary unless there's many intersections in quick succession.

Second, you've been adding a lot of duplicate stop light nodes. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#How_to_map for some instructions on how to map them, but, as it says, ideally each stop light would be mapped exactly once. In a simple 4-way intersection, that can be the intersection node. Where some of the streets are split, stop light nodes can go on the stopping lines with the proper direction tag (forward/backward).

Third, you've been splitting ways at the stopping lines, and I can't figure out why. It'd be one thing if the tags were the same on each side of that split, but you've been setting them to different values, which isn't good intersection modeling. OSM tries to use a 1D data model in a 3D world, and there are some compromises we have to make because of it.

Fourth, turn lanes should only be tagged where there is a turn lane. You've been tagging them hundreds of feet in either direction. I think that you've gotten better at not doing that over time though.

Fifth, you've been using some older imagery. As I'm sure you know, this road has seen a lot of construction in the last few years, and lanes and layouts have changed. It's worth checking newer layers like Esri World Imagery or Maxar Premium to make sure the most up-to-date information possible is being saved.

Sorry if this feels like a lot. You have been doing quite a bit here, and I wanted to catch it so that your future edits can be the best they can be :)
Chedly-fl (2021-07-29 18:17:05+00:00): Thank you for your comment and for reaching out. 
To give you more context, we are currently working on contributing to OpenStreetMaps - we have several ongoing projects in Utah in collaboration with the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) in an effort to make Utah's roads cleaner, clearer and safer (you can find our case study at this link https://tinyurl.com/mfym59j8). 
The ATSPM tag refers to publicly available information from the UDOT Automated Traffic Signal Performance Measures (ATSPM) website (https://udottraffic.utah.gov/ATSPM/). Since we could not find a suitable, existing tag we invented a new one after consulting OSM's documents on tagging (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Any_tags_you_like). If there is an already existing tag that we missed and would be more suitable, please let us know. 
We are trying to add additional information to OSM while keeping it within the community guidelines so your feedback is much appreciated. I will get back to you as soon as possible with a more detailed answer to your points. Please feel free to reach me out at chedly[at]flowlabs.ai in the meantime.
Best
aweech (2021-07-29 19:31:16+00:00): Hi,
I'm glad to see folks working with UDOT to make OpenStreetMap better. I've seen more than one of you, so I suggest reading up on the Organized Editing Guidelines: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.

Regarding the ATSPM tags, I still haven't figured out what they mean. Creating new tags is totally fine, though, as that Wiki page says, they should be documented in the Wiki :) 

I'm guessing that the ATSPM tags might have something to do with the signed direction that the state route goes? If so, it is true that there isn't a widely accepted way to tag that yet. However, this summer we (as a United States community) have been discussing a scheme that would handle that, documented (as a draft) here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Minh_Nguyen/Route_directions. If that is the sort of thing that you mean, I can talk to other mappers in Utah and see if there is interest in converting our state routes to this scheme.
Chedly-fl (2021-07-29 20:19:57+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for the organized editing links, I forwarded them to our team and we will be updating our entries as soon as possible on those pages. 
Regarding the ATSPM tag, it represents the cardinal compass of the incoming edge (to the intersection) using the UDOT standards. For instance, you can get those compass directions relevant to an intersection in this link (https://udottraffic.utah.gov/ATSPM/Signals/SignalDetail by entering a signal id like 7800, all of these are UDOT standards and data). The UDOT standard to assign direction could include double directions for instance Sout-West or North-East like in this example for signal 5005 in Riverdale, UT. https://ibb.co/Tmkkp7z
nevw (2021-07-28 12:29:14+00:00): Hi
You have located your business in a park next to business premises that doesn’t carry your name. Do you have an online presence only?
nevw (2021-08-09 06:34:00+00:00): no response, unable to verify at this location, reverted as expected on-line business listing.
Please re-list at your office location.
manoj_geominds (2021-12-11 04:48:32+00:00): Already there is a bus stop marked. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100670963 can i remove this ?
BubbaJuice (2021-07-27 04:02:06+00:00): Sorry the bbox is so big. I accidentally downloaded an area in JOSM and didn't modify it but it still was in the changeset. My apologies.
tekim (2021-07-27 20:49:26+00:00): Not sure what happened, but this changeset does have actual changes in both Arizona and Michigan.  Otherwise things look pretty good. You did a lot of work in Michigan.  Just need to finish that giant forest polygon
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108653009
Enock4seth (2021-07-27 19:52:04+00:00): Hi, Kindly take note of existing data and imagery offsets when adding new data; especially when using Imagery from Maxar. 

See https://learnosm.org/en/josm/correcting-imagery-offset/
karson_ (2021-08-20 21:30:57+00:00): Why did you duplicate the University boundary? There was already a well-established boundary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967728327. Also, the boundary you drew is very inaccurate and includes lots of properties that are not a part of the university.
karson_ (2021-08-20 21:35:11+00:00): It is worth noting that just because a campus map shows a property, does not mean it is a part of the college. Some universities may show independently owned housing or frats on their campus maps, but because they are not owned by the college, they should not be included in the boundary.
karson_ (2021-08-20 21:54:37+00:00): Corrected boundary to:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13111548
Dimacn (2021-07-29 17:01:45+00:00): У вас опечатка в названии улицы.
adiatmad (2021-07-30 08:51:42+00:00): Hi Neeraj Nema, welcome to OSM! Trust you are doing well.
Is this object a clothing store?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108655443
Aglis IRM-ED (2022-12-01 07:20:07+00:00): hi, saha_123, Thank you for your mapping contribution! I deleted the highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/967742861) because its duplicated with another highway. Thank you (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30155/task/142668237)
Kovoschiz (2021-07-27 12:17:48+00:00): It's not "there is no cover". It's not clear whether `covered=yes` should be used
eggie (2021-07-27 06:31:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

feedback.. 
Alle begin is moeilijk. 
warnings:disconnected_way:highway

Je pad heb ik even losgemaakt van dat bos. Het heeft nergens een verbinding met andere paden. 
Een highway=footway heeft een bord wandelpad G7  Is dat hier zo? Zoniet dan highway=path gebruiken. 

Je edits.https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108660140


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Warin61 (2023-01-25 02:53:25+00:00): Hi,
The Way: Valley Heights Rural Fire Brigade (966467520) ... looks wrong? The DCS Base Map has it on the northern side of the Great Western Hwy near the BP petrol station??