piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Harvesterify (2021-03-18 13:33:54+00:00): Hello,

Good catch, effectivement c'est moi qui me suis planté... Je repasse par le rond point ce soir, je vérifierai de visu, mais 99% de chances que ça soit une "lane" et pas une "shared_lane", my bad !
StephaneP (2021-03-18 13:45:04+00:00): Si tu passes sur place, c'est parfait.
Je te laisserai corriger si c'est nécessaire.

A+
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
ALu68 (2021-01-11 16:56:59+00:00): Ein Baum wird nicht mit leisure=park erfasst.
Wirst du den Knoten auch wieder entfernen, wenn der Baum entfernt wird?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=park?uselang=de
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
osmviborg (2021-01-11 16:22:58+00:00): Hej. Her begår du en klassisk fejl. Cykelstierne er tagget på Mariagervej som cycleway=track
osmviborg (2021-01-11 16:29:18+00:00): For at komme godt igang med cykelstier, er det en god ide at læse vejledningen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning
jenspeterhansen (2021-01-11 17:55:15+00:00): Hej - tak for korrektion og links. Har nu slettet cykelstier. Er glad for, at der ikke - som jeg opfattede det - mangler mange cykelstier. Omvendt ville jeg foretrække, at cykelstier i eget tracé blev lagt ind som stier frem for tracks.
trigpoint (2021-01-11 17:11:54+00:00): Hi, Greyfriars Road has no lane markings so tagging it as having lanes is not really appropriate. It should really be residential.

Cheers Phil
Tom Chance (2021-01-11 17:26:47+00:00): Oops, good catch, I'll correct it
ALu68 (2021-01-11 17:00:06+00:00): Das Gebäude heißt nicht Brautmodengeschäft https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1450421
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

Das ist Unsinn: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8312078141
Parzelle13 (2021-01-11 17:35:54+00:00): 8312078141 -> beleuchteter Weihnachtsengel in dem man beteń kann, toll
TheNet1996 (2021-01-12 11:56:02+00:00): Sorry, aber was soll das nun?
Ein Weihnachtsengel mitten auf dem Rathausplatz.

Lieber Patrick, fast all deine durchgeführten Änderungen hier bei OSM sind falsch. Grundsätzlich sind wir froh um jeden Mapper in Augsburg aber du solltest die Sache schon etwas ernster nehmen und auch ein Blick ins Wiki werfen, wie etwas getaggt werden muß. Danke!
Viele Grüße
Mike
ALu68 (2021-01-12 17:47:47+00:00): Changesets vom 11.01.2021 (97318863, 97318811, 97318678, 97318481, 97318409, 97317981, 97317753, 97317645, 97317523) fixed

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97389704
shuui (2021-01-11 18:25:27+00:00): Hi! Why add area=yes to piers? The wiki says they can be mapped as areas so that would make this tag unnecessary.
daderkina (2021-01-12 16:54:29+00:00): Hi! 
Thanks for your question! I did it because piers should be mapped like poligon, not like lines.
So, it has an area inside lines
shuui (2021-01-12 17:02:44+00:00): It seems like mapping piers is the same as mapping buildings. For example, building=yes doesn't need an area=yes tag.

The wiki says, "piers can be tagged as areas" which I believe is the same meaning as with buildings?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpier
daderkina (2021-01-12 17:13:31+00:00): You are right, but buildings are mapping like poligons, not like lines.
Piers could be mapped with lines, but in this case they should be in the middle of the pier, like a road, and not along the perimeter.
If they are mapped along the perimeter, then on the maps they are displayed as an empty square, not with area
ALu68 (2021-01-11 17:01:39+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop=clothes?uselang=de

vs.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Ddry_cleaning
stillhart (2025-05-28 21:10:55+00:00): 🤩
ALu68 (2021-01-11 17:04:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dlanguage_school
user_5359 (2021-01-12 05:48:25+00:00): Hallo! Kurze Frage, welcher der beiden deutschen Wikipedia Artikel ist jetzt der passenderer Artikel?
ALu68 (2021-01-11 17:07:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=bank?uselang=de

vs.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dbeauty

Das "Nagelstudio" hat sicherlich einen richtigen Namen?
Parzelle13 (2021-01-11 17:33:59+00:00): Wieso das ist doch eine Bank die Nagelstudio heißt?
ivanbranco (2022-01-04 15:34:16+00:00): Hi PraKH,

I noticed that you added in this and other changeset invalid place=* values. Can you check them out and fix them please? 

You can find them here:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1eM6
rskedgell (2021-01-11 18:27:54+00:00): Thanks. I'll have to walk the Three Forests Way at some point in order to fill in the rather large gaps either side of Theydon Mount/Theydon Tawney.
Mike Baggaley (2021-01-11 19:52:46+00:00): 18km tagged, 78km to go!
karson_ (2021-01-11 18:09:29+00:00): Heads up, when making names don't use abbreviations. So something like, "hwy 6", should be written in full as, "highway 6". 

This allows the renderer to judge when the road name should be abbreviated or not. It also prevents confusion in abbreviations. For instance, consider https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15933860. This street was abbreviated as "Heim Str" which someone assumed meant "Heim Street". In reality, "Str" was short for "Strasze"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97320169
luiswoo (2021-01-11 23:40:18+00:00): в ростове-на-дону - это "линейный" парк "первая миля" https://rostov.rbc.ru/rostov/freenews/5dcab47d9a7947daf071d7b6 а не улица им. Миля.
iWowik (2021-01-13 07:30:47+00:00): Ничего не понял. что за парк. И как парк может быть линейным.
У любого физического объекта есть ширина.
luiswoo (2021-01-13 08:06:32+00:00): Так он назван в госзакупках.
luiswoo (2021-01-13 08:43:47+00:00): Вру, там это «Прибрежная зона вдоль реки Темерник».
zorglubu (2021-01-12 14:11:48+00:00): Bonjour,

Bienvenue sur openStreetMap. Vous avez amélioré un entrepôt Leclerc avec des building:part, ce qui est bien courageux pour débuter ;-)

C'est pas mal, mais il y aurait quelques petites erreurs à corriger.
Le bâtiment building=warehouse englobant doit être corrigé pour correspondre à l'emprise au sol globale.
Certains "building:part" ont des valeurs inappropriées comme
* building:levels=36 (qui signifie 36 étages - bat au SE)
* building:material=8 (entrée)

N'hésitez pas à me faire un retour si vous avez des questions. Et bonne continuation sur OSM.
Bien cordialement.
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-12 18:38:51+00:00): building=yes
in this case no need to give 
name=building
it is an error.
I corrected

Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
felipeeugenio (2021-01-11 23:25:17+00:00): ALonso. Se achicó permanentemente el estanque? o es solo que está más bajo. En ese caso por favor dejar el dibujo como estaba antes y consultar a la comunidad como hacer con flujos de agua permanentes. Algunas preguntas le han sido hechas directamente, pero no las ha contestado en el chat.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97320863
salve100 (2021-01-13 15:05:36+00:00): hola, en ese caso yo le pondria tag=wetland al rededor, esta imagen creo que se tomo entre julio a septiembre, epoca en las que aun habia lluvias (centro sur), no creo que este se llene de agua a menos que el municipio o alguien lo llene de agua, lo cual es poco probable, ya que con las escasas lluvias no se llenara en años

para estar seguro lo dejare en wetland

saludos
felipeeugenio (2021-01-13 15:09:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dwetland

hola Alonso. creo que wetland no aplica. es solo una baja en el nivel de un estanque o lago y no tiene las plantas que lo caracterizan. déjalo así mejor. saludos
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-11 18:49:25+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
Use Minimum number of nodes...
No need to give name like "Building".
building=yes: is already added(tag)
Please correct it...

Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
santamariense (2021-02-10 22:24:27+00:00): Olá,
Percebi que você fez algumas modificações na classificação viária da cidade de Ponta Grossa. Recentemente foi aprovada [1] pela comunidade algumas regras de mapeamento de modo a harmonizar o mapeamento pelo país, e deixá-lo mais em sintonia com a comunidade internacional. Não sei se você utilizou alguma fonte oficial, ou conhecimento local, mas da maneira como está a configuração do mapa da cidade no OSM hoje, ela ta quebrando o conceito de continuidade. Exemplo: A Avenida General Carlos Cavalcanti está como primary porém não está ligada a nenhuma outra primary (ou superior) da cidade. Dentre outros casos que precisam ser corrigidos.
Existe grupo de OSM Paraná [2] no Telegram, caso queira participar para trocar ideia com a comunidade.
[1] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil
[2] - https://telegram.me/osmpr
ArqUrb Ighor Dombroski (2021-02-11 01:58:52+00:00): Olá! Eu utilizei do conhecimento técnico que tenho sobre o assunto. Elas estão fundamentadas no processo histórico do desenvolvimento urbano do município. A malha urbana de Ponta Grossa é definida por cinco espigões que são as principais avenidas da cidade e principais meios de ligação para os demais pontos da cidade. Nenhuma dessas vias se conecta com vias da mesma tipologia e importância. Agradeço seu comentário e gostaria de entender mais sobre as regras.
seattlefyi (2021-01-11 20:23:24+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit! In order to be consistent with topical mapping convention, just have a couple of suggestions: request expanding the street name abbreviations (SE -> Southeast, CT -> Court), and changing the street type to "residential", as "living street" is a specific classification of street design (see wiki for info). Thanks again!
Salmonleg (2021-01-11 19:43:21+00:00): Привіт!
layer -1 — це під землею;
зазвичай highway=unclassified в межах міста не має бути (від близький до residential по типу). Тут service (+ service=parking_aisle).
Dino Michelini (2021-01-14 10:57:42+00:00): Ciao Patrick ti segnalo anche questo percorso con le modifiche da fare: il name va tolto e c'è sempre il rwn:name errato. Per la url del sito metterei semplicemente https://www.caisora.it (con il protocollo sicuro) tralasciando "sito" perchè in questo modo il vostro sito internet sarà sempre raggiungibile anche quando "sito" fosse rinominato/cancellato, evitandovi così un possibile successivo lavoro di aggiornamento della key website in tutte le relazioni in cui compare.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-01-17 19:46:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 97650366 where the changeset comment is: Reverting sock-puppet vandalism around Longford.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4692
kapazao (2021-01-12 12:11:47+00:00): Hi, I explained you about Mediterranean Sea tides, they almost don't exists and must not be drawn as you want.
A few months ago you destroyed a lot of beaches in Granada doing this and you did not repaired them. You continue saying that you are sure that there are low water marks, I don't know what to say.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96307227
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97322177
kapazao (2021-01-12 12:15:06+00:00): This changeset has lots of edits which are not explained. You should do smaller edits and explain them.
Regards
Salmonleg (2021-01-11 19:35:55+00:00): Привіт! Тут мало б бути building=apartments, не landuse=residential. Перше позначає об'єкт як будинок і вказує його призначення, а друге — тільки тип використання землі.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dapartments
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-11 18:38:04+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
Use Minimum number of nodes...
Please correct it...
 
Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
gscholz (2021-01-17 07:28:59+00:00): Hi RÁDIO Bigode,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-53.45643&lat=-25.25823&zoom=12&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-11 18:36:11+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
Use Minimum number of nodes...
I corrected the shape of the building...
Please check it...
Happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
AMEERUNNISA (2021-01-12 02:55:01+00:00): Ok
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 10:54:52+00:00): Stessi problemi: inserite key ruote in highway
karson_ (2021-01-11 18:19:46+00:00): In this situation, the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/772941530 should be name="2nd Street". Name is supposed to refer to the commonly used name, typically found on the street signs.

So the name of the street is 2nd Street, but is also Highway 6. Notice the tag ref="US 6". The ref tag is used to denote highway networks which are posted with route shields. This tag is rendered in the standard Carto layer in addition to the name tag. The ref tag can be used for interstates as "I ##", US highways as "US ##", state highways as "IA ##", and county roads as "CR ##"
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 10:54:31+00:00): Stessi problemi: inserite key ruote in highway
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 10:54:13+00:00): Stessi problemi: inserite key ruote in highway
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 10:55:19+00:00): Stessi problemi: inserite key ruote in highway
ndm (2021-01-11 19:33:14+00:00): Not a service road - two separate driveways to two separate garages.
tishbh (2021-01-12 14:59:32+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. i have made the edits based on the available imagery. it is good to see the community improvising our edits with the local knowledge. always happy to learn from the community.
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-11 18:28:01+00:00): Buildings shape need to be maintained while mapping (Short key: Q)
happy mapping...
#Naksha2021
Dino Michelini (2021-01-13 10:53:47+00:00): Stessi problemi: inserite key ruote in highway
user_5359 (2021-01-11 19:13:35+00:00): Please answer on https://www.osm.org/changeset/97107539 and stop importing wrong OSM keys.
!bm (2021-01-11 20:45:04+00:00): Hallo sirnicolaz,

OSM ist keine Spielwiese für Fiktionen oder Fake-Einträge. Da deine Hinzufügung offensichtlich gegen OSM-Grundprinzipien verstößt, habe ich sie wieder entfernt. Bitte halte dich an die Regeln!

--besteGrüße!bm
!bm (2021-01-12 00:58:57+00:00): s. auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97330497
Darío Norberto Ruiz (2021-01-12 08:24:24+00:00): Esto es Palestina, no Israel
user_11354269 (2021-02-10 17:33:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Делайте здания прямоугольными. Пожалуйста!
iriman (2021-01-14 21:33:37+00:00): سلام، اینجا ارتباط خیابان اصلی حسین آباد با خیابان دیگری که از جنوب غربی به شمال شرقی می‌رود قطع شده.
jumbanho (2021-01-12 13:35:31+00:00): Hello, thanks for adding all the SR numbers to roads.  There has been a long discussion in the OSM community about the appropriate tags for these numbers. The consensus is to use "unsigned_ref" instead of "ref" for these numbers to indicate that the numbers are  not readily visible to road users (in my experience they are printed in small font on some road signs).
MacLondon (2021-02-24 03:42:14+00:00): Hi. Are you sure that "cycleway:both=track" is correct for Balliol Road + Kelfield Gardens?

It looks suspiciously like "cycleway:both=no" might have been intended here.
ricallan (2024-09-22 13:23:45+00:00): Apologies for long delay. You were correct - I made the wrong selection in StreetComplete for cycleways here.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-31 15:17:06+00:00): Hello,
Just to let you know - if you're participating in organised editing as part of Climate Trace you'll need to update your profile in the same way that https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/isabellasr has.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_2066394 (2022-08-22 15:26:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8066902
Bei den Zufahrten ganz interessant, die sind laut Mapillary Spielstraßen. Hat sich da was geändert?
Netniuq (2021-01-11 19:16:34+00:00): D'ailleurs, la carte et le street vieuw sont trop virux. Donc les toilettes publiques que j'ai ajoutées ne sont ni unisexes ni accessibles en fauteuil roulant sur le mode street vieuw. Cela n'empêche pas que des travaux ayant été réalisés, ce n'est plus le cas maintenant
frosm (2021-01-15 21:16:44+00:00): Bonjour,
la rue a été modifiée car l'objet toilette a été créé comme appartenant à la rue.
n'hésitez pas à les positionner du bon côté.
Bonne continuation
frosm (2021-01-15 21:17:56+00:00): a noter aussi que ele renseigne l'altitude, ce n'est sans doute pas 0m= niveau de la mer que vous avez voulu renseigné, mais sans doute le niveau/étage
Netniuq (2021-01-23 10:52:17+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement je voulais renseigner l'étage, j'enlève cette précision, merci, je ne savais pas que ça signifiait autre chose. Et je vais modifier l'emplacement exact des toilettes. Merci à vous pour votre réaction !
frosm (2021-01-23 15:11:06+00:00): Merci pour les améliorations.
pour l'étage, il y a l'attribut level
bonne continuation
ovruni (2021-01-12 00:33:28+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se menciona "Calles de Castilla, Piura", sin embargo también se han agregando una vía de manzana y dos áreas de manera colindantes a las calles sin explicar el motivo.
Saludos
luiswoo (2021-01-13 08:49:05+00:00): Улица не может быть обозначена как полевая дорога. Покрытие, проходимость и прочее обозначается другими тегами.
luiswoo (2021-01-13 09:09:39+00:00): В ID буквально можно указать, что за транспорт может проехать. Если пузотерка не может проехать, то это не значит, что это не сможет сделать джип или трактор. Не нужно вешать ограничения проезда — они предназначены не для этого.
luiswoo (2021-01-13 09:13:18+00:00): Если проходимость плохая, то не лишним будет указать и реальную скорость передвижения — 20 км\ч, к примеру.
woodpeck_repair (2021-03-31 06:46:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 102020319, 102013660, 102017051, 102013098, 102011378, 102025540, 102016336, 102012763, 102015297, 102022908, 102027001, 102011893, 102014416, 102018345, 102009137, 102015795, 102012305, 102030139, 102028531, 102024191, 102013937, 102019227, 102017661, 102014727, 102021580, 102013409, 102014180 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed Kosu77 imports
Glassman (2021-01-11 21:30:16+00:00): Tip: a better method would be retag and if necessary better align the objects. This method retains the history of the object. However, once deleted the history is lost.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97327198
yrtimiD (2025-05-01 20:58:53+00:00): hi, for some reason you incorrectly changed here many name tags to be in English instead of Hebrew, which is a local language. 
also, I don't see any good reason from changing suburbs to neighbourhood, accordingly to osm wiki - these all are suburbs. 
I'm going to undo all these changes, if you think I'm wrong - let's discuss.
yrtimiD (2025-05-01 21:10:49+00:00): happily this was fixed by other mappers long time ago.
Kangsabati (2021-08-07 10:37:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882602416/history ain't not a culvert!
Nakaner (2021-01-12 09:41:38+00:00): Hallo,

falls es an dir vorbeigegangen ist: Im Gebiet zwischen 8,9°E und 9,9°E, 48,9°N und 49,9°N gibt es neue Bing-Bilder. Diese sind eine sehenswerte Alternative zu Esri-Clarity.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Paramida (2021-01-12 11:32:25+00:00): Hallo,

vielen Dank für diesen Tipp! Habe das Bing-Material in dieser Gegend selten genutzt, obwohl ich im Openstreetmap-Forum etwas über entsprechend gut aufgelöste Bing-Satellitenbilder gelesen hatte. Die neuen Sat-Bilder sind überraschend aktuell und top aufgelöst.

Grüße

Paramida
jleedev (2021-01-12 14:25:59+00:00): Source: https://www.goerie.com/story/news/2020/12/31/state-pays-million-18-acre-gateway-presque-isle-state-park/4102026001/
kylebakerpa05 (2021-01-12 14:38:06+00:00): My mistake forgot to include it
pvp (2021-01-12 17:22:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. Скажите, зачем вы удалили исторические границы поселений? Они были исправлены на boundary:historic и никому вроде не мешали. Район был преобразован недавно, они еще могут понадобиться.
Noro Hibu (2021-01-12 17:27:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. Это уже исторические данные, причём это не физические данные, а виртуальные по сути, на местности их нет. И потребности их сохранять нет. И как показывает практика, такие данные никогда в дальнейшем не требуются.
pvp (2021-01-12 17:59:13+00:00): Любой административной границы "на местности нет". Тег boundary=historic был использован ровно в том самом значении, которое описано в вики. Зачем удалять-то?
Noro Hibu (2021-01-12 18:01:25+00:00): Мне сложно вам сейчас дать ссылки где написано, что ОСМ не база для хранения исторических данных. Это база актуальных данных. На форуме подобные темы периодически обсуждались.
pvp (2021-01-12 18:29:00+00:00): Об этом написано, например, в описании самого тега: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dhistoric
Там же написано, как его следует использовать: временное сохранение данных о границах. У нас там, по-моему, еще даже какие-то мун. органы района еще действуют, на переходный период. В общем, удаление преждевременное. Думаю, надо откатывать.
Noro Hibu (2021-01-12 18:35:15+00:00): Переходный период уже закончился. И эти данные не нужны. С вами не согласен, но войны правок не устраиваю. Если лично вам нужны эти данные - восстанавливайте.
pvp (2021-01-12 18:47:48+00:00): Последний документ, подписанный администрацией района, датирован 24 декабря. http://www.zh32.ru/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/vzhr-2020-12-30-n031.pdf
И это не предел, она до сих пор действует. "Период" -- это не просто вступление в силу закона, это всякая "передача дел" и прочее.
DressyPear4 (2021-01-12 22:59:02+00:00): Olá, não adicione o que não existe.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97328053
Romwriter (2021-03-13 19:35:04+00:00): Hallo cbffosler, Du hast das östliche Ende des Klosterpads mit dem Tag noexit=yes versehen. In dem Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2577856 heißt es, der Klosterpad gehe weiter. Was ist zutreffend?
highflyer74 (2021-03-20 20:17:16+00:00): @cbffosler: könntest Du hierzu bitte kurz Stellung nehmen, damit wir die Lage klären können? Mir fiel auf, dass Du in diesem Änderungssatz recht viele noexit=yes verteilt hast. Hast Du Dir jeden einzelnen vor Ort angesehen?

Dann fiel mir noch das Tagging von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250251698 auf. Irgendwas ist da bei den Höhen-Tags durcheinander. Schau Dir dazu bitte einmal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings an. Danke!
cbffosler (2021-03-23 22:23:03+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. die max-hight und min-hight waren verwechselt und das Dach hatte die verkehrte Farbe. Der Bogen wird nicht darstellbar sein. Ich bleibe dran.
highflyer74 (2021-03-24 11:35:19+00:00): Moin cbffosler und danke für Deine Rückmeldung. Ich glaube, Du bist hier einem Irrtum aufgesessen, der scheinbar öfter vorkommt. Lies Dir nochmal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:min%20height?uselang=de durch. Es müsste vermutlich height=* und nicht max_height=* heissen. Letzteres gibt es nicht. Auch nicht zu verwechseln mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3AKey%3Amaxheight.

Dann fiel mir noch der Name auf. Ist Seufzerbrücke der offizielle Name? Oder wird sie von uns Locals nur so genannt? Dann müsste man ein anderes Tag nutzen.

Dann hatte auch unser Mit-Mapper Romwriter noch eine Frage an Dich (ganz oben), und ich hatte Dich zu noexit=yes auch noch etwas gefragt. Vielleicht könntest Du da noch etwas zu sagen.

Viele Grüße aus HB!
cbffosler (2021-03-25 19:36:53+00:00): Klosterpad:
Den Hinweis hatte ich nicht gesehen - also kein noexit.
Seufzerbrücke:
Das hatten wir damals in der Schule so gelernt - aber Lehrer sind eben auch Schauspieler -
also loc-name
BCNorwich (2021-01-12 10:28:07+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If the path was in the wrong place, (as per your comment above), could you say why you deleted it rather moving it to the correct position and amending the tags? Thanks.

Regards Bernard.