piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Polarbear (2022-04-21 20:00:30+00:00): Hi KartoGrapHiti,
es wäre gut, wenn du bei der Quelle konkret angibst, welche Luftbilder du benutzt hast. 
Dann kann man einerseits erkennen, ob diese für OSM zugelassen sind, andrerseits mit Aktualisierungen vergleichen.
viloan (2019-03-31 20:04:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-13 16:11:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136059221 where the changeset comment is: Reverting MAPS.ME garbage such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10893535607 .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7125
sergeybe (2019-04-02 15:02:56+00:00): Привет! А что обозначает "1" в тексте с описанием ваших правок?
user_3022894 (2021-01-08 11:59:31+00:00): Hi Signalschruber,
auch, wenn es schon lange her ist, wollte ich nur Bescheid sagen, dass ich die nicht mehr aktuellen Linien(-äste) nach Bestwig jetzt gelöscht habe. Das ist mit iD zugegeben wirklich kaum möglich, habe es daher mit JOSM gemacht. Krass, dass das zuvor noch niemandem außer dir aufgefallen war hier in OSM.

Viele Grüße, Lukas
Chris Fleming (2019-04-01 12:14:32+00:00): Hi, I see that you requested a review of this change.

Thanks, for taking the time to sign up to OpenStreetMap and help us improve the map.

You edit itself is great!

However, sometime rather than completely removing the closed branch we often just remove the name and amenity, keeping the point on the map. The advantage of this is that hopefully when someone new moves into the building the point can get the new name and use. 

So for the moment, I've restored it and removed the use and name and added the address.

I'm looking forward to seeing more edits in Alva. Please let me know if you have any questions?
RicoElectrico (2019-06-01 21:12:11+00:00): Cześć, ze zdjęcia (które jest dodane w tagu) wynika, że nie ma tutaj funkcjonującego telefonu, ani nawet jego szczątków:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6374572270
km2bp (2019-06-02 12:52:12+00:00): Cieszy mnie to że ktoś interesuje się moimi zmianami i zdjęciami.  Ten betonowy postument to własnie dawna budka telefoniczna którą oznaczyłem dodatkowo kluczem "ruins" Skąd to wiem?  Proszę  oto odpowiedź https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/x6s9VdX6DRbLxd2HMe4jlw. Niestety przy całej mojej kreatywności nie jestem w stanie wymyślić bardziej pasującego do obiektu zestawu tagów.  Pozdrawiam.
maraf24 (2019-06-03 21:31:57+00:00): historic=telephone?
Może lepiej byłoby umieścić w description co tam było, a zmapować to, co jest? man_,made=telephone_box+ material=concrete+historic=yes
km2bp (2019-06-08 11:54:34+00:00): Dzięki za sugestie. Już poprawione  Dzięki nadaniu kluczy  historic=yes  Obiekty te zostaną wyszczególnione teraz na tej świetnej mapie historycznej naturalnie wraz z doczepionymi zdjęciami które służą za opis obiektu. http://gk.historic.place/
fberthold (2020-03-29 13:24:39+00:00): Hallo moonrider_ka, ich sehe Du hast die Muckenklinge editiert, und die Anschlüsse entfernt. Ist der Weg nicht mehr vorhanden? 
Gruß Frank
flohoff (2019-04-01 08:24:26+00:00): Moin,
wir hatten uns in OWL mal drauf verständigt das wir POIs als Nodes pflegen.

So das die Eigenschaftes des Gebäudes und des Nutzers getrennt sind.

Wenn dann der Nutzer auszieht kann man den node einfach löschen und das Gebäude, Adresse und Co bleiben.

Wenn Mapper die Tags sortieren müssen was da bleiben soll und was weg kann kommt meist leider murks bei raus.

Flo
Dan_Fi (2019-04-01 08:45:50+00:00): Hey Flo,

alles klar. Werde ich dann zukünftig anders machen.
Adressdaten selbst kann oder soll ich aber an beides (Gebäude und Node) legen?
Dan_Fi (2019-04-01 09:02:24+00:00): Node wieder hinzugefügt
flohoff (2019-04-01 12:30:51+00:00): So machen wir das typischerweise - Damit sind beide Objekte "Self conained" und sind auch einzeln komplett.

Flo
Carnildo (2019-04-01 04:55:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

Please don't use the "name" field to describe things.  It's confusing for people who are relying on the map for directions.  (Picture a GPS unit saying "Take a left turn onto Unnamed Steeper Alternative to M trail".)
ma-rt-in (2019-04-01 07:17:24+00:00): Hallo,
deine Änderung wird leider nichts bewirken, da Fuß/Fahrrad immer noch zugelassen sind. Bitte anpassen. Am besten dann noch eine Note aufmachen, dann kann man die aufhebung der sperrung besser dran denken.
vg
Eiland (2019-04-01 13:22:15+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ich habe es gerade angepasst und eine Note geschrieben.
ma-rt-in (2019-04-01 07:18:17+00:00): Hallo,
was genau ist da? Eine Kapelle/Kirche oder nur ein Denkma?
vg
Magnus84 (2019-04-01 16:35:31+00:00): Das ist meines Erachtens eine Andachstätte.
Das ist ein Kreuz / Schrein wo Kerzen stehen.
Ist auch auf Google Maps mit Foto abgebildet.
ma-rt-in (2019-04-01 18:57:56+00:00): Ok. habs mal angepasst.
ma-rt-in (2019-04-01 07:12:28+00:00): Hallo,
dein access bitte wieder entfernen. Der Radweg ist so eingetragen von mir wie örtlich beschildert.
vg
Eiland (2019-04-01 13:32:14+00:00): Ist entfernt.
eggie (2019-04-01 06:26:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-04-01 06:29:07+00:00): Dag HPieter.. Graag de source=BAG  (Kadaster)  intact laten bij mutatie.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-04-01 06:35:37+00:00): source BAG hersteld
utack (2019-04-04 18:39:33+00:00): Thank you, looks good!
tyr_asd (2019-10-24 12:07:04+00:00): Hi. Zur Info: Hier hast du vergessen ein kurzes Stück der Mönchgasse (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88660527) als nicht-oneway zu markieren. Außerdem bitte in Zukunft daran denken, beim Umdrehen der Wegrichtung auch die Tags anzupassen (z.B. sidewalk=left<->right, turn:lanes, etc.) und Turn-Restrictions entsprechend zu aktualisieren.

Sollte in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76150639 jetzt passen, aber gerne nochmal drüberschauen. :)
whb (2019-10-25 15:18:12+00:00): Danke fürs Aufpassen. :)
Mich wundert allerdings, dass ich das mit dem left <-> right übersehen habe, da JOSM bei Änderung der Wegrichtung automatisch die Seitenänderungen vorschlägt, vielleicht habe ich mich bei dem Bestätigungsdialog vertan.
geoaria (2019-04-01 05:17:16+00:00): دوست عزیز توجه داشته باشید برای کوچه ها و کوچه های بن بست از تگ residential استفاده نمایید تگ tertiary (جاده درجه سوم) برای معابر شریانی با درجه اهمیت بالاتر استفاده می گردد. برای آموزش حتما متون ویکی را مطالعه نمایید
viloan (2019-03-31 22:18:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-04-09 10:59:47+00:00): Hallo,
kannst du diesen Node mal übrpüfen? Da ist ein "?" in einem Key:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6374723749

Gruß
Jan
MitteloberrheinischerWaldameisenschreck (2019-04-09 11:45:05+00:00): Das ist vom nächstliegenden (Weichen-)Signal kopiert, da es aber kein Weichensignal ist, sondern irgendwas anderes, was ich auf der Actioncam nicht erkennen konnte, das switch prov. durch ? ersetzt und die Note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1730965 gemacht ... ;-)
cdruck (2019-04-03 20:58:09+00:00): Hi stevea,

I'm not sure if you noticed, but I think something glitched with this changeset. There is a huge chunk of unattached points with no tags along a portion of the Palo Alto city boundary. I'm not sure what went wrong, but I thought I should bring this to your attention. Here is a node id for one of them for reference: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6374728376
stevea (2019-04-03 21:36:13+00:00): First, thank you for calling what appears wrong to me so politely.  I reloaded relation/1544955 into my JOSM browser and I found that there is a single point in that relation which had the role "label" instead of the more proper "admin_centre."  I have changed this to admin_centre.

While the editor before me placed this "in the general downtown Palo Alto area" (I've been there many times), in a city (like this relation), it emerges as an OSM convention that this be placed at City Hall (rather than the relatively random nearby location of University Avenue and Centennial Walk) — a very minor fix.

However, I can't find what you mean by "a huge chunk of unattached points with no tags along a portion of the...boundary."  The members of the City relation do "make a nice loop" with the members, indicating that it is a closed polygon, which for City Limits, is correct and proper.

This was a difficult edit and I was managing multiple data sources, so I am the first to agree with you that I MIGHT have left such a segment, but without some further lat/long coordinates or specific /way or /node specifications, I don't know where you mean.  If you help me discover these (where you mean by continuing OSM errors), I'll do my very best to clean them up or apply whatever remedy is correct.

This channel is fine, or you could missive me at user:stevea.  Thanks again!  -Steve
stevea (2019-04-03 21:43:44+00:00): Ah, I see what you mean about the ONE node you specify, but I'm now in a better process of discovering any others that exist and clean them up.  It's a tricky "changeset inclusion" algorithm I'm applying.  Stay tuned, I'm working on it now.  This channel is fine for communication. -Steve
stevea (2019-04-03 21:58:41+00:00): Yes, there a whole bunch of unconnected nodes not "tied together" by a way along San Francisquito Creek.  I have no idea why this happened, though I suspect a bug in the JOSM editor:  version 14824 which I am using and is current has had several problems I've notice (but not yet reported as defects via bug report).

I'm working on cleaning these up, though it may take me several changesets as I discover them.
stevea (2019-04-03 22:18:29+00:00): OK, I think I got them all, but if you find more, please let me know. -Steve
cdruck (2019-04-03 22:30:40+00:00): Thanks for getting on this so quickly! I did a quick look around the area and I did see that there are still a handful of nodes (though not as dense as before) south of El Camino along the city boundary. This string of nodes that I still see are between these 2 nodes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6374728474 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6374728531
Other than that, it looks good! Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!
-Chris
stevea (2019-04-03 22:52:09+00:00): Sure, Chris:  cleaning up OSM messes is one of my long-time undertakings in the project, especially when the mess is MINE!

I deleted those two nodes (thanks for your specificity), though I couldn't find any others.  Perhaps if you tell me your method for discovering these, I can delete them all.  (I loaded into JOSM the PA boundary, then used Validator plug-in to check for "unconnected node with no tag").  I don't see others, but that doesn't mean I might have missed a few!

PA is a weirdly-shaped city:  it has that "strip" through the Stanford Dish area to connect the southern park areas to the urbanized area (similar to how San Diego connects San Ysidro's Mexico border area to the rest of the city, Chula Vista and National City are conveniently avoided with a clever "strip" through the bay).  In the earlier version before I did this cleanup over last weekend, these were totally disconnected in PA, and it truly needed fixing.  I think it is largely OK now.  (Though, true to OSM fashion, "the map is never done").

Thanks again for pointing out these node glitches and again, should you find any more, I'll clean them up, or if they are minor, I might ask you to do so.

Regards,
Steve
cdruck (2019-04-04 19:40:48+00:00): Thanks for taking care of that! I will let you know if I come across anything else.

Best, 
Chris
Константин Гам (2019-11-04 16:39:25+00:00): вот зачем было ломать геометрию идеально прямого проспекта?
532910 (2019-11-04 18:06:15+00:00): 1. геометрию идеального прямого проспекта по прежнему пряма и идеальна.
2. а вот к чему ваш вопрос, если вы даже в изменениях не разобрались?
Константин Гам (2019-11-05 06:09:04+00:00): Она идеальна после восстановительной правки, а после ваших подвижек было вот так: https://ibb.co/rGPJNst
Colin Smale (2019-04-01 19:25:54+00:00): Why have you changed the boundary=administrative into boundary=historic? These appear to be current admin boundaries.
Colin Smale (2019-04-01 19:28:26+00:00): I take it back, just read about the structure change. Sorry!
SiHollett (2019-04-01 20:28:05+00:00): No worries - it's only just happened.
viloan (2019-03-31 23:05:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
JulianoG20 (2019-03-31 23:26:38+00:00): Obrigado pela receptividade.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-04-01 08:47:07+00:00): @topolusitania a igreja não se chama Igreja de Santa Maria Maior. Petence é à paróquia de Santa Maria Maior. a edição do utilizador removeu o nome correto "Igreja do Socorro" e substituiu por este incorreto. Mesmo que se admita o nome que colocou, nunca deveria ter removido o outro. Este utilizador tem mudado nomes sem os fundamentar, quando já solicitei que os fundamente. Exemplo o Jardim Municipal do Funchal, que colocou como sendo "Jardim de São Francisco", quando não  se chama assim, nem nunca teve esse nome. Aguardo que o utilizador fundamente, caso contrário as edições serão revertidas.
topolusitania (2019-04-01 11:41:24+00:00): Eu nunca diria que a "Igreja do Socorro" que de facto tem vários nomes, e um dos oficiais é o de "Igreja de Nossa Senhora do Socorro" nunca teve o nome de "Igreja de Santa Maria Maior". basta fazer uma busca pela web para que este nome apareça e indique explicitamente esta igreja. Por isso acrescentei a nota.
https://funchalnoticias.net/2017/09/25/festa-na-igreja-de-santa-maria-maior-em-homenagem-a-senhora-do-socorro/
https://www.madeira-web.com/pt/locais/funchal/arquitetura/igreja-santa-maria-maior.html
A própria igreja católica lhe chama apenas São Tiago Menor e diz que fica no Largo do Socorro.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-04-01 11:44:05+00:00): Exacto. Imprecisões. O problema aqui está na edição do utilizador que removeu um dos nomes. Vou fazer revert à edição que mudou o nome.
kiaraSh-Q (2019-04-11 20:38:51+00:00): متاسفانه در این چنجست شما اشکالات زیادی هست و تغییرات شما باعث از بین رفتن بخش مهمی از دیتای نقشه که مربوط به مرزهای سیاسی بوده شده. لطفاً بیشتر دقت بفرمایید.
Stereo (2019-04-01 15:50:59+00:00): Hello! I'm curious, would the Macedonian and Serbian name always be the same? Happy mapping, Guillaume
bjankuloski (2019-04-01 21:26:48+00:00): Hello Guillaume. For areas on the Balkans, they are usually similar, but often not the same. Even if names are the same, serbian tradition dictates that the ending be a bit different than Macedonian (e.g. -ац vs -ец) and vice versa. Some can be very different), but overall there are lots of similarities.
As for foreign places, especially country names, they are often pretty different. Thanks you for the question and all the best!
viloan (2019-04-01 00:44:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-04-01 06:36:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-01 03:11:59+00:00): This got slightly messy with conflicts with Nate_Wessel's edits on College Street and of the 505 and 504 relations around Dundas West station. Hopefully nothing broke...
Jarek 🚲 (2019-04-01 03:16:52+00:00): I also have no idea how I ended up "editing" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667697356 - sorry!
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Kovoschiz (2019-07-15 19:00:55+00:00): Please don't delete ways and replace them with faulty tagging.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:10:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
kiaraSh-Q (2019-04-11 20:39:24+00:00): متاسفانه در این چنجست شما اشکالات زیادی هست و تغییرات شما باعث از بین رفتن بخش مهمی از دیتای نقشه که مربوط به مرزهای سیاسی بوده شده. لطفاً بیشتر دقت بفرمایید.
kiaraSh-Q (2019-04-11 20:39:06+00:00): متاسفانه در این چنجست شما اشکالات زیادی هست و تغییرات شما باعث از بین رفتن بخش مهمی از دیتای نقشه که مربوط به مرزهای سیاسی بوده شده. لطفاً بیشتر دقت بفرمایید.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:11:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:11:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:11:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Mark Holt (2019-07-29 16:33:00+00:00): Crossroads United Methodist Church ended up with a duplicate church building and shed.  I didn't know if I should just fix it or if I should tell you since it was a (somewhat recent) building import.  I also don't know if I should trust the satellite or your import.  Thoughts?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68740992
Mark Holt (2019-07-29 18:26:38+00:00): Crossroads United Methodist Church has two buildings (and two sheds) apparently from your import.  I'm not sure if I should delete one of the duplicates but I don't know which duplicate to delete, if you even care or if I should be telling you so that you can look for other duplicates from this import.  I could match it to the satellite image that I prefer but I don't know if your import had more accurate data.  Thoughts?
JohnHovercraft (2019-07-29 20:44:25+00:00): Thanks for letting me know, Mark. You're right, it looks like this import did end up with some duplicated buildings that need to be cleaned up. This imported building data is somewhat dated, and I find that the "Mapbox Satellite" imagery is the best reference in this area. I'll try and get this cleaned up later today.
JohnHovercraft (2019-07-29 21:12:12+00:00): I think I've removed all the duplicates in this area now. Let me know if you find others. Thanks again, Mark!
skiddleyboop (2019-04-18 18:32:49+00:00): nice
jnucc (2019-04-01 04:40:45+00:00): Changeset correction - "Changed way tag from 'path' to 'unmaintained track'"
marczoutendijk (2019-05-10 19:43:02+00:00): Hola Motores
En esta área has marcado una gran cantidad de "landuse = farmland". Pero en realidad debería estar etiquetado como "landuse = orchard". He cambiado algunos pero hay tantos que tal vez quisiera cambiarlos usted mismo. Un huerto es fácilmente reconocible por su diseño típico de cuadrícula cuadrada de los árboles. Mayormente olivos, pero también almendros.
Marc Zoutendijk.
viloan (2019-04-01 05:02:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2019-07-21 15:11:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 15:11:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
user_5359 (2019-04-01 14:42:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the definition of emergency (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aemergency%3Dfire_extinguisher). I correct this.