piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nzara (2021-04-01 06:12:46+00:00): Hi, diese war unbeabsichtigt. Bei diesem Changeset wollte ich nicht an dieser Strasse arbeiten. Vielen Dank für deinen Hinweis. 
Jetzt ist mir auch noch aufgefallen, dass sich die Verkehrssituation in diesem Bereich wohl im letzten Jahr deutlich verändert hat. Mapping und Orthophotos sind veraltet. Ich werde das nach einem Besuch aktualisieren.
trigpoint (2021-03-29 19:24:02+00:00): Restored footpath, certainly not a track
elliobur (2021-03-30 07:39:30+00:00): I have received images from DA's showing me this with both car's and vans using this as a track
trigpoint (2021-03-30 07:47:24+00:00): What is DA?

Cheers Phil
elliobur (2021-03-30 07:50:33+00:00): Driving associate, one of our drivers
trigpoint (2021-03-30 08:18:13+00:00): The track you have photos of is probably Turners Lane. This section is legally a public footpath and therefore should not be used by motor vehicles, that is not to mention the geography of the area. Turners Lane is diagonal for a reason.
eggie (2021-03-29 15:11:05+00:00): Dag TvdB  Dat gaat niet werken zo..  
Verbind een paaltje met een node die onderdeel uitmaakt van de weg. Alleen dan zal de router het begrijpen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-29 15:13:02+00:00): Twee paaltjes met de rijbaan verbonden
Tvdb-HVC (2021-03-30 05:44:04+00:00): Ah, duidelijk. Bedankt voor de uitleg
Adam Franco (2021-03-29 13:28:39+00:00): My changeset comment got automatically truncated when saving. The full comment:

Downgrading US7 near Bennington to Trunk. As discussed in previous changeset comments and replies, this highway is a "Super 7" structure that is not up to full motorway standards. While it does have many grade-separate intersections, traffic is either not directionally separated or only a single lane in either direction for all but a tiny portion of these routes. Speeds are lower than those of I-89 and I-91 as well. Depending on the consensus of highway=trunk use in the US, downgrading this to highway=primary may be warranted, but it is certainly not highway=motorway. I'm leaving it as highway=trunk now to indicate that it is "something more than primary" while it is not fully a motorway.
ezekielf (2021-03-30 00:45:29+00:00): 👍 I support this change.  So there's a VT consensus of at least two.
aweech (2021-03-31 15:08:14+00:00): Yeah, to compare it to other roads in the region, it looks a lot like Route 9 through Henniker (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/43.1601/-71.8351) or Route 16 north of Rochester (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/43.4192/-71.0111). I support having it be trunk.
VMPanes (2021-03-29 13:33:41+00:00): Edit: source should be Maxar Imagery, Bing Imagery, Osmose, OSMI, JOSM Validator
Tomas Straupis (2021-03-29 15:06:08+00:00): Laba diena. NIEKADA nereikia klausyti iD redaktoriaus pasakojimų apie „pasenusias“ žymas. Bandysiu atšaukti šį pakeitimą, nes jis sugadino krūvą gerai pažymėtų objektų :-(
MartynasB (2021-03-29 16:13:45+00:00): Ačiū, kad įspėjote. Ateityje žinosiu.
Tomas Straupis (2021-03-29 16:24:28+00:00): Puiku. Jei kyla kokių neaiškumų - visada galima klausti (galima manęs tiesiai, galima sąrašyne talk-lt https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lt). Pilnavertis redaktorius yra JOSM (josm.openstreetmap.de).
Sėkmės!
Patchanka (2021-03-29 15:13:27+00:00): voir cette discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101922623
Patchanka (2021-03-29 15:13:13+00:00): voir cette discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101922623
Patchanka (2021-03-29 15:12:58+00:00): voir cette discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101922623
habi (2022-12-16 11:44:27+00:00): Ciao defikarte_app
Der Defi gehört wohl ganz woanders hin.
Gruss aus der Nachbarschaft,
habi
chnuessli (2022-12-18 20:17:53+00:00): Defi verschoben
Patchanka (2021-03-29 15:12:32+00:00): voir cette discussion https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101922623
TaraV (2021-03-29 13:56:02+00:00): Correction: Bing aerial imagery was used
muchichka_s (2021-03-29 14:19:14+00:00): Hello, amatissart

Actually, in our cadastre, these villages (Драгиня, Яноші) had exactly the same topology of borders as I had marked. Yep, I saw these GeoFactory warnings. I consulted with Garmin-User, who corrects border errors across whoole Europe, he said it's all good. And any validator indicates only potential problems that require manual review. I don't see any reasons  shift these boundaries through any validator warnings
amatissart (2021-03-29 14:45:40+00:00): Hello,
Yes, I also noticed these warnings about "touching rings" in GeoFrabrik OSM inspector. And I thought they could be the cause of an issue with our own tools for administrative boundaries.
After verification, these touching rings are probably not an issue here.
Thanks for your vigilance. I just reverted my last 2 changesets.
muchichka_s (2021-03-29 14:56:47+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply and confirmation, that your tools handle these corner cases correctly. Have a nice day
Patchanka (2021-03-29 15:11:36+00:00): bonjour
vos modifications posent beaucoup de problèmes:
- vous ajoutez dans le "name" un mot qui décrit l'objet et qui n'est pas un nom, par exemple "Poubelle" ou "Table de pique-nique". Le nom n'est pas prévu pour cela. Une poubelle en général n'a pas de nom.
- vous avez ajouté leisure=picnic_table sur une poubelle ce qui signifie que la poubelle fait également table de pique-nique, ce dont je doute fortement... Deux objets => deux points dans OSM.
Merci de corriger ces erreurs et de tenir compte de ces remarques pour les prochaines contributions.
OTPBBAYLAC (2021-03-29 15:21:21+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour les remarques.
c'est corrigé.
Patchanka (2021-03-29 15:32:35+00:00): merci. Bonne soirée
user_1566574 (2021-06-22 12:34:45+00:00): Salut !
Pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923395817, éviter de mettre en majuscules/capitales, même si le panneau l'indique. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Cartographie_des_routes_en_France#Noms_de_voies)

Merci de l'ajout !
Cortix (2021-04-25 00:37:26+00:00): Ciao, l'avevo aggiunto io perché provato qualche mese fa. Direi che mi sembra esagerato toglierlo solo perché ogni tanto cresce della vegetazione. Se lo teniamo segnato, la gente passerà e continuerà ad utilizzarlo. Ciao
mikima (2021-04-26 07:11:30+00:00): Ciao,
l'ho riprovato anche io e soprattutto la prima parte (lato sud) è pressoché invisibile. Non sono neanche sicuro fosse un vero e proprio sentiero, in un paio di punti passa da un terreno scosceso. Comunque ok lasciamolo che magari tramite uso diventa più tracciato, magari mettiamo tag visibility:none così uno sa che al momento è poco visibile
eggie (2021-03-29 14:34:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
user_12950232 (2021-03-29 15:15:33+00:00): Bedankt Eggie!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
eggie (2021-03-29 14:37:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-03-29 14:49:39+00:00): Dag ABokhorst

Probeer in 1x bij te taggen op de bestaande  BAG adresnode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-29 14:51:34+00:00): Info samengevoegd.. svp niet zelf adressen aanmaken. Het is import vanuit het Kadaster.
gr eggie
Abokhorst (2021-03-29 16:51:46+00:00): Oke, maar ik heb toch geen BAG toegevoegd. alleen een point gemaakt, bijv net zoals een speeltuin aanduiding of een aanduiding van een camping.

Alleen aan het point heb ik het adres aangemaakt.
Abokhorst (2021-03-29 16:53:45+00:00): Het is tenslote een winkel maar ook een woonhuis, ik zie die dingen wel los van elkaar. 
Iemand kan een winkel hebben in zijn garage, maar dat betekend niet dat zijn woning een bedrijfspand is geworden
eggie (2021-03-29 17:15:41+00:00): Dag Abokhorst.. Je bedoeling is uiteraard goed. Ik begrijp je punt, maar het is niet conform afspraak binnen OSM.
Het is één pand met één BAG adres. Soms heb je bv 62A, maar dat is dan een officieel uitgegeven nummer door de gemeente. 
Eén adres is de afspraak.
Wanneer je de manier van tagging wilt veranderen dan kun je dat inbrengen in de community.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Er worden doorlopend voorstellen gedaan. 
De format van het adres klopte niet..Zie

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101923166

postcode en woonplaats  weken af.

Er is al eerder een discussie geweest om alle winkels los te taggen op een aparte adresnode zodat het huisnummer blijft renderen. Dat heeft het niet gehaald.
Maar je bent vrij om een draadje te beginnen op het forum. Zelf probeer ik me zoveel mogelijk te confirmeren aan de consensus ook al heb ik soms ook een andere mening.

Afspraken worden dan weer vastgelegd in de wiki... Tja en soms blijft het rijstebrij.

Ook bij dit soort vragen kun je op het forum terecht. 


Vanuit de BAG  (kadaster) worden de gebouwen en adressen geïmporteerd. Ook dat is een afspraak.

Soms heeft één gebouw één adres met meerdere bedrijven. Komt ook voor. Dan wordt het schipperen.
Op het forum loopt momenteel een draadje ivm een mapper die bezig was alle BAG adressen over te zetten naar de gebouwomtrek. Die is nu alles aan het herstellen .
Soms gaat iemand op z'n neus, maar er wordt niet iemand iets kwalijk genomen. 
Lees eens op het forum hoe ingewikkeld het is om de community op één lijn te krijgen.
Gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:20:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:46:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
eggie (2021-03-29 15:08:29+00:00): Dag TvdB  mofo even gecorrigeerd naar mofa.
gr eggie
Karthoo (2021-03-30 09:23:01+00:00): Hallo Hiausirg,
bitte importiere in Columbus keine Gebäude aus dem Datensatz von Microsoft, da wir in Franklin County auch bessere Gebäudedaten zur Verfügung haben. Gehe in RapiD dazu auf das RapiD-Symbol rechts neben Fläche und gehe dann auf Managa Datasets. Dort kannst du dann die Gebäudedaten für Franklin County auswählen und wie gewohnt hinzufügen.
Karthoo (2021-03-30 09:23:55+00:00): *Manage
zluuzki (2021-03-30 15:36:17+00:00): Naja, Import war es sicher keiner, ich habe ja jedes Gebäude einzeln hinzugefügt und überprüft - hätte ich die Gebäude selber gezeichnet, dann hätte es nur länger gedauert. Aber egal. Das mit den vorgefertigten Gebäuden ist ein super Tipp, danke dir!
TravGW (2021-03-29 19:07:45+00:00): Mapping a hotel as a node is an acceptable method of adding a hotel.  It was not necessary to delete the hotel node. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel
sovereign_ch (2021-03-29 17:05:23+00:00): Mappe bitte keine Dächer, wenn bereits korrekte Grundrisse erfasst sind.
realjep (2022-02-15 11:22:18+00:00): Ciao, lo skatepark risulta essere all'angolo con via Villette / via Roma non qui. Se ti risulta anche a te puoi cancellare questo e mapparlo come erba.
TravGW (2021-03-30 14:45:44+00:00): You and your mapping team need to take better care when deleting hotel points. Currently you are deleting them without copying over additional data to the hotel building. We are losing good data because of this. For example in this changeset when you deleted the hotel point we lost the address for this hotel. You must copy this data over the new hotel building.

Please read the wiki for guidance when mapping hotels. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:31:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
WoodWoseWulf (2021-03-30 23:08:20+00:00): Hi Offenstein,

Welcome back to OSM!

You've mapped https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923407904 as water, but looking at Bing Imagery (which seems to be the highest quality here), it appears to be a tarp over the roof on a shed/garage?

Please also keep in mind that the correct tag for a swimming pool is leisure=swimming_pool, not natural=water. Private pools should also be marked as such.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool
eggie (2021-03-29 14:56:14+00:00): historic=monument is vertaald uit het Engels iets heel anders.
Denk aan de Tajmahal. Het zijn meestal grafmonumenten. 
Denk bv aan de slagvelden en kenkelhuizen bij Verdun
\
A memorial object, which is especially large (one can go inside, walk on or through it) or very tall (see the examples), built to remember, show respect to a person or group of people or to commemorate an event. 

Hier dus
historic=chimney of building

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-29 14:59:41+00:00): Het monument het ik verwijderd.. Al je yags maar op de omtrek gezet van de schoorsteen.
eggie (2021-03-29 15:02:14+00:00): Hier even wat leesvoer https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument
en nog wat ter leering ende vermaeck 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic

.. en ik typ weer aardig op de verkeerde toetsen... 

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-03-29 15:05:28+00:00): kenkelhuizen> knekelhuizen  :)
Mannivu (2021-03-29 16:28:58+00:00): Mi sembra errato indicare Trezzolasco come neighbourhood (che in italiano indica i quartieri). Se è una frazione non va segnalata l'area, ma aggiunto un nodo con i tag per place=village
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101924289
Dustin C (2021-03-31 20:23:14+00:00): Hi,

I'm consuming this data for routing and simulation in abstreet.org. Currently, I'm interpreting highway=footway, bicycle=yes to mean that bikes can use the way, per the "bicyle=yes" note in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footway. I'm curious what you mean in your changeset comment by the Burke routing being normal again. How do I know this footway is usable by bikes? By the absence of bicycle=no? By segregated=no?

Thanks!
-Dustin
austinsnow (2021-04-03 15:15:22+00:00): Sure!

For a long time, the Burke-Gilman cycleway was rerouted due to construction, and the reroute took it through this intersection. This is what led to the bicycle-specific tag to be placed there, and I reverted things to the default for clarity.

While it is true that "bicycle=yes" is the appropriate way to designate that bicycles are permitted, actively adding the tag in all cases where bikes are legal (rather than leaving the default) can lead to confusion or danger. For instance, in Washington/Seattle bicycles can legally ride in all intersections and on all sidewalks, but if all of them are tagged as "bicycle=yes", it makes it hard for cyclists to know which locations are actually for cycling - like wider paved footways or connectors between cycleway routes. Cycling apps that pull in the tags to map out all bike routes (like Wandrer, for instance) rely heavily on this data to be accurate.

As for knowing in Seattle if something is useable for bikes, I would include anything that is "bicycle=yes/designated/permissive", but also all sidewalks and intersections by default, even if not specified. Footways are trickier - those are where the specific tags come in most handy, because they encompass a wide variety of routes, some of which are bike-accessible and others not.

This is admittedly challenging and controversial, because one can indeed argue that all sidewalks & intersections in the city *should* be labeled with "bicycle=yes" (as should Washington Interstate highways, for that matter), in line with what is technically legal. Perhaps this is the ideal. But as the implications of extra tags matter, and I don't think anyone is rushing out to add bicycle tags to all the sidewalks/intersections, I think in practice it's ok to leave intersections like this with default tags. 

Other challenging areas in bike access mapping include the fact that many sidewalks & intersections remained unmapped, and many non-bike trails/footpaths have been incorrectly marked as paths, which by default allow horse/bike access. But this should improve over time, I hope, as these are fixed.
- Marlan
Dustin C (2021-04-14 16:52:27+00:00): Sorry for the slow response and thanks for this explanation! I won't revisit https://github.com/a-b-street/abstreet/issues/330 (to make sure things like the Burke are modelled reasonably in A/B Street) anytime soon, but I'll revisit your notes here when I do.
ToniE (2021-03-30 09:17:40+00:00): Hallo CyberCocktail,

willkommen bei OSM und ebenso willkommen bei ÖPNV in OSM.

Es sieht so aus, als pb  du die Linien hier nach dem PTv2-Schema (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Public_Transport&oldid=625726) mappst.

Dazu wäre es gut und hilfreich, wenn in den Relationen zusätzlich

public_transport:version=2

getagged ist.

Dann kann PTNA weitere Analysen durchführen.

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/RP/DE-RP-VRM-Analysis.html#bus_988

Viele Grüße,
Toni
ToniE (2021-03-31 09:01:27+00:00): Danke, dass sieht in der Analyse "schlimm" aus, aber das wird schon noch.

Kennst du JOSM, die Alternative zum Editieren im Browser?

JOSM ist deutlich besser geeignet um Relationen zu Editieren. Der Umstieg lohnt sich mittelfristig, auch wenn die Lernkurve am Anfang u.U. steil ist : https://josm.openstreetmap.de

Viele Grüße,
Toni
ianlopez1115 (2021-03-29 14:41:53+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 99138716, 99138769, 99138781, 99138793, 99138813, 99138819, 99138831, 99138869, 99138897, 99138912, 99138963, 99138991, 99139011, 99139034, 99139055, 99139121, 99139130, 99139137, 99139166, 99139175
faustopt (2021-03-31 00:04:42+00:00): ETIQUETA ERRADA - Não usar a etiqueta NOME (name=*) para descrever coisas! Se é iniciante no OSM Antes de editar consulte as Boas Práticas em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas#N.C3.A3o_usar_a_etiqueta_name.3D.2A_para_descrever_coisas
impiaaa (2021-04-02 14:57:48+00:00): The map is only supposed to have one feature per item, however you have added 2 duplicate hotels and removed a useful point. Please keep the features as points like it was before, or make it an area or multipolygon, instead of multiple buildings. Additionally, please don't make individual changesets for single movements. Your last 3 changesets are all in the same area and could be made 1.
eggie (2021-03-29 15:49:10+00:00): אנא בהולנדית או באנגלית 
שלום 
eggie
eggie (2021-03-29 17:50:40+00:00): Dag Pepijn .. Je vraagt om een review.. Lijkt me oke zo.. verder moeilijk te bepalen voor een buitenstaander. Up to you!
MVG
eggie
user_12950232 (2021-03-29 18:28:09+00:00): Ja het zijn m'n eerste OSM wijzigingen, vandaar de review voor de zekerheid dat ik niet iets raars fout doe. Bedankt!
eggie (2021-03-29 22:33:04+00:00): Pepijn... Wanneer je paden tegenkomt met routerelaties nog even afblijven, want die kun je niet bewerken met editor iD..
Zie commentaar op een latere changeset.
Mapse,
Eggie
user_12950232 (2021-03-30 12:01:52+00:00): Staat genoteerd, bedankt!
bikingaround244 (2021-03-29 16:44:43+00:00): this was not a fitness station it was a bench I added. I was adding it from Go Mapp app on phone and im not sure why I said fitness station
Ser9ei (2021-04-04 23:31:21+00:00): Слушай, старичок, а может хватит бегать по пятам и ломать чужую работу? Надублировал линий, убил мультиполигоны, оставил линии без тегов, нарисовал какой-то нелепый трек по контуру территории. Так лучше стало? Или из принципа нагадить только делаешь? Нравится уже иметь имя нарицательное в сообществе, которое у всех только усмешку вызывает? Я думаю взывать к рассудку тут уже бессмысленно. Старичок, блин! Гений. Вандализм буду просто репортить.
Константин Гам (2021-04-05 08:16:19+00:00): Так не надо портить данные наверное, не?
Ошибок допущено здесь с десяток, что по форме, что по содержанию.

Заметил, исправил. Никаких преследований, я просто здесь живу (в Петербурге). Удачи
Ser9ei (2021-04-05 08:43:28+00:00): Можно поконкретнее тогда уж? Прямо по пунктам от 1 до 10ти, чтобы конструктив был.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-03-29 15:15:58+00:00): This was done together with FietsTeam@StadGent
wireguy (2021-03-29 17:36:11+00:00): Hi Brianw, welcome to osm!  You don't need to put a name on every green.   Take a look at the wiki  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

or at this https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85218057
DressyPear4 (2021-03-30 15:19:47+00:00): EI! NÃO IGNORE COMENTÁRIOS, o modo que você inseriu dados não é correto.
Se o local não possui nome deixar esse campo em branco.
Para definir telhado de uma olhada aqui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
Para material aqui https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:material
Lachgast (2021-05-21 11:11:42+00:00): Nice approach of showing a demolished building! Quite original, I must say :)

I noticed the building has already been demolished and they laid the foundations for the replacing building. 

If you want, you can report this on the Dutch forums and request an import from government data. This is called a BAG-import. 
The request can be done here: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52973&p=370

You'll need to share the address and the location on the map. You can easily do that through the small menu on the right of the map window.

You can log in to the forum using your Openstreetmap login details.
Lachgast (2021-05-21 11:13:09+00:00): I forgot to mention that, through the import, the contour for the new building will be put on the map, including all addresses. Have fun!
user_1566574 (2021-03-30 12:43:45+00:00): Salut !
Pourquoi avoir supprimé ce chemin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/767812856 ?

Il semble bien présent. :/
Merci d'avance !
ash_win (2021-04-01 08:46:01+00:00): Hi Marie Ysabel Reyes,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 902554027,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102108616
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101927200
Keima (2021-05-12 19:38:05+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour qu'il puisse être déduit automatiquement que c'est une pizzeria il serait utile de rajouter des attribut en plus de "name". Par exemple "amenity=restaurant" et "cuisine=pizza". 

"name=*" doit servir à donner le nom du lieu si il en possède un et non le décrire. (Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.)

Cordialement,
Keima (2021-05-12 19:38:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour qu'il puisse être déduit automatiquement que c'est une école il serait utile de rajouter des attribut en plus de "name" (Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dschool).

Cordialement,