piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
highflyer74 (2021-04-14 14:28:29+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe hier ein paar Änderungen vorgenommen, da Du (was nicht schlimm ist) ein paar Fehler gemacht hast, die fast jeder am Anfang macht.

Ein paar Punkte die mir auffielen:

- Nutze name=* bitte nur für Eigennamen und nicht, um ein Objekt zu beschreiben. Um was es sich handelt, geht meist schon aus den vorhandenen Tags hervor (Beispiel: leisure=pitch und sport=soccer reicht und ein name=Fußballplatz ist nicht gewollt).

- Sei so nett, Landflächen nicht mit Wegen oder anderen linienförmigen Objekten zu verbinden, da dies die Wartung der Daten sehr erschwert.

Damit Du eine bessere Vorstellung davon bekommst, wie OSM funktioniert, lies Dir bitte folgende Informationen durch:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Falls Du Fragen hast, oder mehr Infos möchtest, melde Dich gern, dann lasse ich Dir per PN noch mehr Tipps zukommen.

Viele Grüße!
SColchester (2021-04-14 13:56:07+00:00): Reviewed - several buildings unsquared, please ensure to square the corners of buildings by pressing 'q' on your keyboard after you have tagged them as buildings. Please also zoom right in when you map buildings to ensure that you hit each corner as accurately as you can with a left click.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102862763
Greg_Rose (2021-04-14 05:01:34+00:00): Hello - Please stop creating fake routes and objects. Your mapping assistance is greatly appreciated in Mali, but what you're doing is considered map vandalism, and is NOT helpful at all. Thanks
oldwarm (2021-04-14 05:19:26+00:00): sorry, I will try to delete them.
Greg_Rose (2021-04-14 05:23:18+00:00): I have already deleted them - no need to.
oldwarm (2021-04-14 05:27:21+00:00): ok, thank you. I thought this is a game.
SColchester (2021-04-14 13:48:11+00:00): Checked - several buildings unsquared, please ensure to square the corners of buildings by pressing 'q' on your keyboard after you have tagged them as buildings. Please also zoom right in when you map buildings to ensure that you hit each corner as accurately as you can with a left click.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102863109
totera (2021-04-13 15:07:14+00:00): Qui sicuramente non va bene, passando da railway=disused a railway=rail hai "riattivato" la ferrovia (stesso discorso per i passaggi a livello da disused:railway=level_crossing a railway=level_crossing)
Andre68 (2021-04-13 13:01:38+00:00): Overlapping coastlines are WRONG! Please fix! I will NOT fix it again! The render will also NOT render this correctly... It was correct until you "fixed" it. Remember that coastline edits take _days_ to go through the renderer...
Most likely some other coastline reviewer will fix this in a few days... if you don't...
SnailMiner (2021-04-17 11:11:10+00:00): Sorry about making a mistake in the first place. The coastlines were not actually overlapping, but had a common edge which was wrong. My wording was also "tried to fix", and I'm only hoping the fix I tried on 15.4.21 separating them (which is actually wrong in reality) will work.
These islets are in reality grown together through landrise. What would be the correct way to represent this?
Andre68 (2021-04-18 09:32:42+00:00): Hi SnailMiner. OK, sorry for beeing harsh... The area is still not rendered correctly (because of the rendering delay), but I think it will at least beeing rendered with the not mapped gap in a few days. I would suggest to wait until this happens. After that I would offer my help to "fix" the gap... The correct mapping would have been how I did it. The coastline should enclose the whole land area, while the separate islands then would go into two separate multipolygone relations.
Andre68 (2021-04-18 09:42:56+00:00): I've just looked more closely to the aerial image and it could be that the area between the island is intermittend water. If that is the case then the island are _not_ connected... But that can not be decided due to the aerial images, only a local can know this...
SnailMiner (2021-04-24 19:10:59+00:00): Hi Andre68
The rendering has still not completed, but some tiles on a couple of close zoom levels looks to render ok now.
Meanwhile I did some more research on if the area should actually be land or intermittent water on the map. I found a DEM with 2 m grid size and history data on sea level recorded every hour in Porvoo some 25-30 km away. According to the DEM the lowest point between the islands has an elevation of about 45 cm and looking at the sea level history it would be submerged some 3-4 time per year for some hours during storm surges mainly in the autumn and winter time. 
The definition for areas without tides looks to be that the coastline should be placed according to the mean sea level so maybe it is land. It is probably quite wet anyway.
SColchester (2021-04-14 12:28:24+00:00): Checked - several buildings unsquared, please ensure to square the corners of buildings by pressing 'q' on your keyboard after you have tagged them as buildings. Please also zoom right in when you map buildings to ensure that you hit each corner as accurately as you can with a left click.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102863689
marczoutendijk (2021-04-14 18:55:43+00:00): This was not for kaashvi but for: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/virlgil%20van
SColchester (2021-04-14 11:50:32+00:00): Checked - several buildings unsquared, please ensure to square the corners of buildings by pressing 'q' on your keyboard after you have tagged them as buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102863876
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 10:50:23+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on Bing aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 10:50:34+00:00): Привет и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!

Не могли бы вы объяснить, какой у вас источник для ваших дополнений? Я уверен, что добавленные вами имена не видны на аэрофотоснимках Bing.

С уважением,
Энди
Ontario_Cartographer (2021-04-13 23:43:57+00:00): You forgot to mark it as proposed, I marked for you.
tonyf1 (2021-10-25 11:31:45+00:00): see Changeset #112942687
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-02-04 04:47:29+00:00): المكان لا يوجد فيه عامود أو برج هل أنت متأكد من وجود برج؟
BAK365 (2021-04-13 21:05:20+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe deine Änderungen an der Via Alpina rückgängig gemacht [1], da du die Superroute gelöscht und ganze Etappen umgekrempelt hast. Revertiert deshalb, weil es sehr schnell sehr schwierig wird aufzuräumen, wenn andere Mapper irgendwo an den Etappen etwas ändern. Sorry, normalerweise ist die Reihenfolge umgekehrt - zuerst diskutieren und dann ändern.

Die Via Alpina ist so gemappt, wie sie in der Schweiz bekannt und signalisiert ist. Betreiberin ist Schweiz Mobil / Wanderland Schweiz. Du siehst das auf den Fotos hier https://i.imgur.com/nXG2j2B.jpg und hier https://i.imgur.com/uPhe9nl.jpg. Diese Route solltest du nicht ändern. Wie man sie ins europäische Fernwanderwegnetz aufnehmen kann, weiss ich nicht. Ich habe mich damit nicht befasst. Vielleicht diskutierst du das am besten auf talk-ch.

Grüsse, BAK365

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102886954
enz1an (2021-04-14 07:52:43+00:00): Das ist in Ordnung! Wo finde ich die entsprechende Diskussionsplattform?

Das Einbinden ins europäische Netz könnte auch über eine zusätzliche Relation (Via Alpina Green, network: iwn) gehen! So müsste man die bestehende Relation, welche die Sektionen zusammenfasst nicht ändern...
BAK365 (2021-04-14 14:53:57+00:00): http://lists.openstreetmap.ch/pipermail/talk-ch/

Ich weiss, dass das Thema bei europäischen Fernwanderwegen schon diskutiert wurde, kenne mich da aber nicht aus.

Happy mapping!
user_3022894 (2021-04-17 15:49:14+00:00): Hi Kienzler,

ich hab eine Frage bezüglich deiner Bearbeitung von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5396630903/history , und zwar hast du dich dort doch glaube ich vertan. Der Punkt, den du hier bearbeitet hast, stellt eine Parkhaus-Einfahrt dar. Das ist aber nicht dasselbe, wie eine Fahrradverleihstation. Ein und derselbe Punkt sollte daher nicht dazu verwendet werden, auch einen DeinRadschloss-Standort darzustellen. Der DeinRadschloss-Standort ist und war doch auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5807523759 bereits eingetragen. Mit allen Details. Ist zwar nicht direkt am Eingang, sondern wenige Meter weiter, aber die dortige Position entspricht meiner Kenntnis nach eben dem genauen Standort. Das heißt dann, es war doch bereits alles eingetragen, oder?

Viele Grüße, Lukas
eggie (2021-04-13 13:19:51+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
Tip.. maak altijd een combinatie met de aard van het bedrijf.. anders doet de vemelding niets in osm.
Bv office=company
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2021-04-13 15:03:25+00:00): office=company toegevoegd
rthik007 (2021-04-14 05:40:03+00:00): Hi Divyaaa,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road .Kindly check with NODE: 321414013.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102901303
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102865134
SomeoneElse (2021-04-14 08:10:51+00:00): Hello,
It looks like the changes here broken the High Weald AONB relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8815682 .  I've fixed that in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102912562 .
Best Regards,
Andy
Christopher-0118 (2021-09-20 13:45:59+00:00): Hello
Thank you very much for your attention and correcting the inaccuracies of my mapping.
eggie (2021-04-14 19:39:30+00:00): Dag Joost,

De tag die een ervaren openseamapper gebruikt is
barrier=cable_barrier
seamark:obstruction:category=boom
seamark:type=obstruction

access=no gaat hier denk ik niet helpen of het moet bedoeld zijn dat je niet over de ballenlijn naar de overkant mag? 
Gr eggie
Joost4000 (2021-04-14 20:13:46+00:00): Nee dat laatste is niet de bedoeling. Ik heb het gewijzigd
literan (2021-04-14 21:38:52+00:00): и зачем вы мультьиполигоны зданий превратили обратно в полигоны (да еще и теги мультиполигона при этом оставили)? откатываю.
user_10654882 (2021-04-13 13:52:01+00:00): Reported,
SomeoneElse (2021-04-13 16:25:26+00:00): For the avoidance of doubt "legal entity" is completely irrelevant; what matters is verifiability - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability .
user_10654882 (2021-04-13 16:33:00+00:00): Please return each entry as it was
woodpeck (2021-04-13 18:41:07+00:00): MTB FORIS, you are clearly deleting information that belongs to a competitor of yours. You have a massive conflict of interest here. You are not a neutral party. In the future, if you find that members of "Evolution" have created paths that you do not agree with, please report them to DWG and we will investigate. Do not delete anything yourself; we will interpret that as vandalism.
woodpeck (2021-04-13 18:44:57+00:00): save eskimo, please provide evidence about the physical existence of the "Evolution downhill 1" and "Evoution downhill 2" routes. We would be looking for photos of clear, on-the-ground signage. If these routes are not visible on the ground and not clearly visible then they cannot be in OSM. (The same is, of course, true for any "MTB Foris" routes.)
user_10654882 (2021-04-13 19:48:29+00:00): The trails are captured with the mapillary app and you can see everything.
i can insert 20 gpx files confirming the tracks I am an enthusiast and have no interest or conflict of interest.
user_10654882 (2021-04-13 19:59:54+00:00): Global Heatmap screenshot :
https://www.flickr.com/photos/192152915@N03/51113891699/in/dateposted-public/
user_10654882 (2021-04-13 20:45:44+00:00): Photo album :
https://flic.kr/s/aHsmVfzDP2
user_10654882 (2021-04-13 20:56:57+00:00): GPX : https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/sava%20eskimo/traces/3635852
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/sava%20eskimo/traces/3635855
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/sava%20eskimo/traces/3635857
user_10654882 (2021-04-13 21:00:59+00:00): I think this will be enough evidence to justify the existence of trails. I also think you will be looking for the same kind of evidence from a user who deleted my drawing on OSM.
Best regards
MTB FORIS (2021-04-13 22:46:29+00:00): And let's do it again. There are no bike paths. These are forest roads, through a private forest. The name "MTB evolution" does not exist. It's a fictional name. It is confusing to users who want to pass here.

OSM profile MTB FORIS is the official profile of our cycling club that is registered and legally exists. A person who introduces himself at OSM as Sava Eskimo, or another name MTB Evolution, degrades our club in all public media, behind which stands a large number of prominent citizens, ... Google map, Facebook, OSM ....
It is perhaps most visible on Facebook where it can be publicly read that almost every post is aimed at degrading our work.
View profile: https://www.facebook.com/MTBEvo

So, this person is constantly degrading our work. And here I was the first to draw the path, which after me "Sava Eskimo" immediately began to change and edit.

Check in the history that every change of mine "Sava Eskimo" edited, rewrote deleted ...
I reported to the administration ... This is a classic mobbing and systemic degradation of our work ....

Check it out. And if you need any proof, I am at your disposal.
user_10654882 (2021-04-13 23:25:28+00:00): @MPB FORIS 
I don't know how relevant this is in proving the non-existence of the path.  Thanks for advertising my FB page.  Maybe one of the administrators will start following me😉
MTB FORIS (2021-04-14 00:14:00+00:00): I pointed out to the administration that you are deliberately degrading our work at OSM. I can easily check this if they check the history of changes. It is about changing everything I add to OSM, the "Sava Eskimo" account, deleting, entering false data and the like.
I shared a Facebook URL to show how you selectively degrade and violate the integrity of our club on the MTB EVOLUTION page. And that can be easily seen.

Right now, you have deliberately mistakenly named our club and typed the acronym “PMB,” which you also emphasize on Facebook, on a Google map to call us by our nickname.
This is an acronym in our language that as a club wants to connect us to politics.
So, in this way, "Sava Eskimo" insults and humiliates us.
MTB FORIS (2021-04-14 00:18:35+00:00): Right now he has insulted us publicly and in front of the administrators. This is the greatest audacity and impudence.
We are not "PMB", but "MTB". “PBM” is an acronym that connects us to political parties. In no case, as a non-governmental and non-profit organization, do we cooperate with the parties. This is an insult ...
I am asking the administrators to react immediately !?
MTB FORIS (2021-04-14 08:30:02+00:00): Now specifically.
These trails are not arranged, they are not completely passable for bicycles, they do not have bicycle content, nor do they have any sign that says that it is a bicycle path.
Also, the name Evolution was invented and it is confusing to call a trail such, and especially several trails, ie one terrain, because this name was invented by one individual "Sava Eskimo". All that "Sava Eskimo" does, that is, the individual who hides behind this account, and presents himself in other media as MTB Evolution, is to degrade our work.
Behind our account is a cycling club, the only one in this city of East Sarajevo. We do concrete things. And everything that we physically change and exist in the field, we want to put the same on OSM. I think that's the only thing that's right.

With respect,
user_10654882 (2021-04-14 08:47:21+00:00): What is right will be decided by the OSM administration.
Your opinion is that there are no paths, although you have not proven it. I'm not hiding behind a name. I have one account on OSM, unlike you who tried to draw a polygon with two accounts, although the administrator was warned. Please do not spam anymore let the administrator make the decision.
MTB FORIS (2021-04-14 10:17:06+00:00): This is a forest private road passed by tractors and pedestrians.
There is no path.
There is no tag.
There is no name "EVOLUTION". It is in fact the fictional name "REVOLUTION", with the omitted "R" designed only to degrade our work. I proved this with links. If necessary send as much evidence as needed.
The person "Sava Eskimo" insulted me, because she called me a deliberately wrong name.
MTB FORIS (2021-04-14 10:20:27+00:00): This is a forest private road used by tractors and pedestrians.
The bike path is not arranged.
There is no physical sign that says it is a trail.
There is no name "EVOLUTION". It is actually a fictional name "REVOLUTION", with the omitted letter "R", systematically created by an individual who wants to humiliate the work of our local club. I proved it with links. If necessary, I will send as much evidence as needed.
The person "Sava Eskimo" insulted me because he called me a deliberately wrong and derogatory name.
woodpeck (2021-04-14 10:55:09+00:00): MTB FORIS, clearly you have invested a lot of time and money to establish a proper organisation and set up physical infrastructure and so on. That is laudable but it does not give you a monopoly about mountain biking in the region. Other people - individuals, hobbyists, non-organised people without any club, without a leader, without structure - have the same rights as you to use their mountain bikes and to record trails that exist on the ground in OSM. Just because you are the only recognized club doesn't mean that only your trails can be on the map. @sava eskimo we will review the material. @both please do not resort to name calling on OSM or we will block you both.
MTB FORIS (2021-04-14 12:14:10+00:00): Since the announcement is public, I would not like the public to misinterpret our actions. We certainly support the work of all cyclists, especially our local ones, because we are fighting for a better local cycling infrastructure. We support the constructive work of any individual. We don’t want to be alone in that story, and we especially don’t want to have a monopoly. We invite all cyclists to get involved and to improve cycling in every domain through constructive work. However, here we point to an individual who constantly degrades our work through all available web media, including OSM, we point to an individual who humiliated and insulted us because he called us a derogatory name in front of you.
Basically, there are no trails arranged here, so there are no bike signs, or any detail that would indicate that these are bike trails. This should remain a forest road. The name should by no means be "Evolution" because that is not the name of this place. That is our opinion.
user_10654882 (2021-04-14 12:26:40+00:00): The attack on me continues,
Unbelievable. Will someone stop this?
user_2066394 (2021-04-14 09:25:20+00:00): Die Nr. 1 hattest du hier in den Friedhof verschoben:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102866965
joergro (2021-04-14 09:33:48+00:00): Danke für's korrigieren. Das war ein Versehen von mir.
Tomas_J (2025-03-26 14:38:02+00:00): ahoj, vseobecne popisy do name nepatria. pouzi nabuduce tourism=viewpoint, opravil som
Marek-M (2021-09-29 12:24:56+00:00): Cześć, bądź proszę bardziej uważny przy hurtowym łączeniu adresów z budynkami, bo w tej edycji zdarzyło Ci się niepoprawnie połączyć budynek ze sklepem Rossman. W budynku jest więcej sklepów, więc taka zmiana jest nieprawidłowa. Przywrócę ten budynek i sklep Rossman ale pewnie warto jest przejrzeć pozostałe edycje hurtowe.
Marek-M (2021-09-29 12:44:52+00:00): Widzę, że sporo budynków zaktualizowałeś w taki sposób, że jedna z firm w budynku została wpisana do obwiedni. Nie jest to dobra edycja. Wg mnie powinna być wycofana. Często tylko mały fragment budynku jest zajęty przez jakiś sklep a przez tą edycję cały budynek staje się sklepem.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102867232
Marek-M (2021-09-29 12:47:22+00:00): Edycje w Kartuzach są całkowicie do wycofania, tylko  n24981918 może być uznane za dobrą edycję. Postaram się wycofać te zmiany w Kartuzach.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102867232
Piotr Strębski (2021-09-29 13:32:35+00:00): To dosyć dawne łączenie adresów z obrysami budynków, faktycznie z czasem zobaczyłem nieoczekiwane efekty (o których piszesz w przypadku Rossmann) i zacząłem ręcznie odkręcać takie efekty. Dziś wieczorem mogę w Kartuzy powrócić i przejrzeć tego typu "kwiatki". Dzięki za uwagę!
Piotr Strębski (2021-09-29 13:34:33+00:00): Swoją drogą to pokazuje, czemu nie powinno dublować się danych adresowych w konkretnych POI względem punktu adresowego wpisanego lub nie w kształt budynku.
Marek-M (2021-09-29 20:02:49+00:00): Patrząc na to w ten sposób, to faktycznie adresy w POI są utrudnieniem. Nie mniej jednak nie są to błędne tagowania i być może autor wtyczki do łączenia adresów z budynkami mógłby ją przerobić, żeby z punktów POI pobierał tylko dane adresowe do budynku a POI zostawił by bez zmian. Ten scenariusz jest dla mnie bardziej wykonalny. Łatwiej wprowadzić zmianę w pluginie wykorzystywanym przez tysiące mapowiczów niż odzwyczaić ich od dodawania adresów do POI. Sam zresztą dodaję adresy do POI, więc Twoje błędne scalanie jest poniekąd przeze mnie :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Glassman (2021-04-13 18:50:37+00:00): Thanks for fixing, I appreciate it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102867698
jonorossi (2021-04-14 01:11:43+00:00): I've partially reverted this changeset. You've accidentally modified the place node for Caloundra and changed it to parking.

Tip: check out the summary of your changes on the left in iD before you upload.
Leo Slager (2021-04-14 22:15:43+00:00): Dear SOlutionS,
This is not the correct way to put an entrance on the map.
Read the wiki about this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:entrance
The entrance should be on a node and not on a way.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.37030&lat=51.15728&zoom=18&opacity=0.70
conradoos (2021-04-28 05:33:09+00:00): Cześć,
widzę, że dodałeś kilka dróg lub zmieniłeś ich przebieg na podstawie zdjęć lotniczych. Ale te zdjęcia lotnicze są nieaktualne (pewnie z zeszłego roku, jak jeszcze trwała budowa). Byłem tam na początku kwietnia br. i uaktualniłem mapę. Wrzuciłem teraz kilka zdjęć na Mapillary (ale chyba trzeba poczekać do jutra aż się pokażą). Moim zdaniem ten zestaw zmian jest do wycofania.
Deuar (2021-04-28 19:58:43+00:00): Cześć, pełna zgoda. Jeśli byłeś tam ostatnio to masz dużo lepsze dane. Te zdjęcia były lepsze niż to co było poprzednio, ale mają chyba z pół roku przynajmniej. Piotr
conradoos (2021-04-29 20:00:52+00:00): Wycofałem Twój zestaw zmian. Przynajmniej tak mi się wydaje, bo nigdy wcześniej tego nie robiłem. Ale skorzystałem też z Twojej edycji, bo poprawiłem zbiornik na wodę - na tych nowszych zdjęciach lotniczych już ma ostateczny, prawidłowy kształt.
Deuar (2021-04-30 08:44:01+00:00): Super :)
erenozdemir (2021-04-19 12:51:46+00:00): ups masss edit :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102867895
eggie (2021-04-14 19:34:28+00:00): Dag wjtje   Zie nu dat je om feedback vraagt.
'k Had al eerder wat aangepast hier. 
Lijkt me oke zo..  Dat pad naar het water heb ik even op de steiger laten eindigen.
In het noordelijke pad heb ik een brug gelegd.. anders wordt het zo'n natte boel bij de oversteek. 
MVG
eggie