piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Reino Baptista (2021-04-20 15:15:36+00:00): António,

Eu próprio fico dividido sempre entre fazer ou não a simplificação de estradas. Quando sou eu a desenhadar com o Fast Drawing do JOSM, e uso uma escala de desenho muito minucioso, há sempre "pontos a mais" e parece-me sempre melhor simplificar. Outra situação em que aplico a simplificação é quando procedo à ortogonização de edifícios que claramente têm uma planta regular na imagem de satélite, mas não estão desenhados com esquadria de 90º no OSM. Para além destas duas situações não sou um entusiasta da ferramenta de simplificação. Neste caso concordo que NÃO deveria ter feito a simplificação. De futuro vou cingir-me 
 às duas situações que descrevi acima.

RB
Hungerburg (2021-04-20 19:07:49+00:00): Hallo wasteoflifetime, mir gefällts, mit welcher Achtsamkeit du hier und in der Nähe auch auf die Daten losgehst. Gibt sicher blödere Dinge mit denen man seine Lebenszeit verschwenden kann. Herzlichen Dank meinerseits!
user_12861758 (2021-05-02 07:14:10+00:00): Danke für die Blumen.

Ausgenommen in Städten in welchen unsere Mitbewerber vermessene Stadtplan Gebäudeumrisse nutzen, konkurrieren wir in Österreich ausnahmslos mit Maschinen welche simpel vom Luftbild den äußeren Dachumriss abzeichnen. Man nennt das Luftbildvermessung und Photogrammetrie. Hier ist aber der Mensch der Maschine  überlegen, denn wir Mapper können mit unserer Erfahrung sowie durch Vorort Erhebungen durch Zeichnen des Gebäudegrundrisses einen Mehrwert gegenüber lediglich mit Kapitaleinsatz generierten maschinellen Karten schaffen. 

Mir ist bewusst dass Luftbilder nach vermessenen Gebäudegrundrissen ausgerichtet werden, dass hierdurch anschließend auch die vom Luftbild ermittelte Dachaussenkante vermessen wäre das ist ein Märchen.
Carnildo (2021-04-19 18:31:04+00:00): The "DIY Store" tag is meant for places like Home Depot.  Horizon Distributors looks like it might be a "Trade Shop", while I don't know how to tag a heavy-equipment dealer like Vermeer Rocky Mountain.
deven_smith_ (2021-04-20 01:07:14+00:00): Didn't realize there was a trade shop tag, thanks for the info. I'll use commercial/industrial building tags for places I can't tell what tag would work best
Carto'Cité (2021-12-28 16:03:56+00:00): Salut Mathieu,
Belle description de ce cas rare de bande cyclable à double sens ;)
Merci pour ta contribution !
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
_Mathieu_ (2021-12-28 16:37:27+00:00): Oui, un aménagement bien pourri dont nos aménageurs ont le secret (ah, ce moment où la personne qui se déplace à vélo en circulant du côté gauche de la chaussée se retrouve face à un bus qui veut lui desservir son arrêt <3 )
À bientôt,
Mathieu
baspng (2021-04-19 22:15:03+00:00): Senhor mapeador,
O que aconteceu com o Posto dos Lagos? Encerrou as atividades ou só a conveniência?
Na verdade não houve apenas uma complementação do meu trabalho, como normalmente ocorre e sim a demolição dele, inclusive com a exclusão do "building", resultando em retrocesso para o objeto mapeado.
E também, tem validador que não aceira BR como "brand". Quando isso acontece, ele recomenda alterar.
Obrigado por ter lido.
C210 (2021-04-23 19:44:15+00:00): Informo ao prezado, que não editei neste posto em questão, e também não efetuei o apagamento do local.
Favor verificar. Grato
baspng (2021-04-24 18:32:01+00:00): Olá, C210,
Você não editou, tudo bem, eu acredito, mas peço que analise a  changeset 103213320, editada por C210.
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=103213320

Em seguida, por favor, veja as seguintes, também edições de C210:
103212641
103213120 (só Terminal Urbano)
103413446
103335703
ou
 https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=103212641

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=103213120

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=103413446

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=103335703
Desculpe-me por dar sugestão, mas como você disse que não editou, interessante seria trocar a senha.
Obrigado
MxxCon (2021-04-21 04:53:29+00:00): Hello.
If it's a _community_ garden, doesn't that automatically make it publicly accessible?🤔
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103213818
portalaventura (2021-04-19 17:17:28+00:00): Boas-vindas nikferreira29, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
VA00 (2021-05-05 16:27:09+00:00): Coś Ci się źle kliknęło - cała rzeka poszła w tunel.
pan_borsuk (2021-05-07 23:07:21+00:00): dzięki A. zamiast tuneliku pod drogą.. poleciała rzeka.. na bogato :-D

i tak jeszcze dwa miejsca przecięcia odpuściłem gdyż trza pojechać i wybadać!
PèreForez (2024-06-17 17:12:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Je me permets de vous signaler que le positionnement du mémorial 470597831 fait d'après le cadastre est en erreur et en doublon avec le 2e objet mémorial 11028020389 créé à la réelle position de ce monument.
Cordialement
colgza (2021-04-19 17:48:55+00:00): If the person reviewing this wants to revert this changeset, I ask that they do so without using any scripts.
colgza (2021-04-19 17:49:22+00:00): This change set includes the addition of different features, such as tree rows and bus platforms.
clay_c (2021-04-19 19:53:24+00:00): Looks generally okay to me. Some nitpicks:

* Nearly all of the bus platforms should be shorter, and preferably mapped as areas. Look for the different-colored pavement along the platform edges. Walkways to the platforms are not part of the platforms themselves.

* Does Euclid Avenue have any turn restrictions along this route?
colgza (2021-04-19 20:05:41+00:00): 1. I will work on that at a later time if no one does so before me.

2. I think it does, but I'm not sure how it impacts buses.
clay_c (2021-04-19 20:24:32+00:00): I'm talking about turn restrictions along the main roadway rather than the busway. Of course these don't impact buses, but they're important to map so routing software doesn't direct people to make illegal turns.
skorasaurus (2024-04-08 21:19:27+00:00): Hi, 

Thanks for the discussion and the mapping. 

As a longtime clevelander who has driven and ridden as a passenger on the healthline numerous times, as recently as a few months ago..

Regarding Turn restrictions for vehicles (non-buses): 
if I recall correctly, some of the intersections (heading east/west on Euclid) are signed for no U-turns; but that's about it. 

I adjusted the bus platform for 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/669182098

in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149753311 ; there's a lot more to do (drawing the crossings for the other parts at this intersection, etc). 

this might spur me and some other local contributors to fix this up some more 

(note if you happen to edit around here by prompt of this message, note that the aerial imagery by bing and mapbox is outdated; there's been a fair amount of construction/development around this area in the past few years, even the past 12-18 months; we have local imagery provided by the county)
mueschel (2021-04-24 12:11:08+00:00): Hi,
please check this node, it doesn't have any valid tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8644562550

If it's a barrier, it should be connected to the highway.
Bernard59118 (2021-04-24 13:17:55+00:00): Yes, but I cant do it, with OSMAnd
mueschel (2021-04-24 16:43:41+00:00): Could you add a 'fixme' tag or leave a note in these cases? I spotted it just by coincidence, because this tag wasn't used in other places before.
Bernard59118 (2021-04-24 16:58:48+00:00): J'ai prévu de corriger à mon retour
kakiremora (2021-04-19 20:15:37+00:00): Dzięki, że ktokolwiek inny tutaj zagląda :). Zauważyłem jednak, że wprowadziłeś w tym i poprzednim edicie kilka budynków całkiem niepokrywających się z ortofoto?

Czy przejrzałeś zawartość importu względem ortofoto? Czy może to jakieś "niedobitki"?

Pozdrawiam

Przykłady:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/932549279
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/932549235
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/932549247
kubahahaha (2021-04-20 10:25:01+00:00): Hmm, nie wiem z jakiego ortofoto korzystasz, ale z tych budynków które podlinkowałeś, to jeden miał trochę inny kształt, ale pozostałe zgadzają się z Geoportalem. Przejrzałem okolicę jeszcze raz i mam nadzieję, że teraz już nie będzie błędów.
Dzięki za pilnowanie!
eggie (2021-04-19 18:26:03+00:00): Hier kloppen je accesstags niet.
Je hebt er een fietspad van gemaakt, maar dat heeft geen tracktype grade2 (Dat hoort bij een track)
motorcycle=yes  op een fietspad? 
Staat dat C6 bord er nog steeds.. ?
Kijk je nog even naar je edits? 

Het is verderop een Onverplicht fietspad G13
Daar mogen geen moped en mofa komen. 
Denk dus je tagging aanpassen. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103216178

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-19 18:20:35+00:00): Dag thijst
Je vraagt om een review..
Lijkt me oke.. oneway=no hoeft niet op een regulier fietspad.
foot=yes kan geen kwaad, maar is ook default.
MVG
eggie
karson_ (2021-07-05 15:31:10+00:00): Hi, I noticed that pretty much all of your changesets have issues. Some big things that stand out to me are capitalization -- you shouldn't capitalize something unless it is actually capitalized. For instance, "MIAMI", should be "Miami". Another issue is abbreviation. You should never abbreviate something. Why would you force the data consumer to make an assumption about what the abbreviation implies. It is best to write out words in full.
Glassman (2021-04-21 23:04:13+00:00): Just one suggestion, move the address to the house or building instead of on the road. Routers will pick the road nearest to the house irregardless of the name of the street. 

Also, access=private should only be used if the driveway has keep out signs. 

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103217439
bkhorram7 (2021-04-19 18:31:48+00:00): محل توزیع وپخش فرآورده های نفتی
Gerold (2021-04-21 06:59:22+00:00): Eine Aussegnungshalle ist keine Kirche.
PT-53 (2021-04-21 07:58:19+00:00): Richtig.
Wie wäre es mit
amenity=funerall_hall ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfuneral_hall
PT-53 (2021-05-20 07:36:49+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
Du hast zusätzlich zu dieser P-Fläche
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/691240575/history
noch diesen
P-Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8644839251/history
erstellt.
Damit war der Parkplatz doppelt in OSM eingetragen. Ich habe Deinen P-Knoten deshalb wieder gelöscht.
Grüße

PS:
Gefunden mit keep right
AndresDuhour (2021-06-04 19:23:56+00:00): Hola! se agregó el nombre 9 de Julio a una calle nueva, que corta otra que también se llama 9 de Julio. Parece que esta ordenanza designa nombres nuevos pero no estoy seguro cuál es el de esa calle http://hcd.saavedra.gov.ar/2019/11/25/6817-2/. ¿Tiene más conocimiento del nombre correcto? Saludos! Andrés
southtexasmonkey33 (2021-04-20 02:55:44+00:00): Looking good! Thanks for contributing to the Rio Grande Valley!
portalaventura (2021-04-19 18:58:55+00:00): Boas-vindas Woot-Woot, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
portalaventura (2021-04-19 19:02:14+00:00): Boas-vindas @viniciuscamachog, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2021-04-25 08:51:25+00:00): Hallo,
"firefighter_pole" gibt es bis jetzt nicht. Was hälst du von 
playground:vertical_pole  oder
playground:sliding_pole ?
antabeer (2021-04-25 10:55:33+00:00): Hallo mueschel,
danke für die Rückmeldung. Bin begrifflich offen, wollte mich aber am Bestand orientieren.
Mein erster Gedanke war "vertical_bar" (analog "horizontal_bar" für Reckstange) gewesen, dann hatte ich "sliding_pole" (siehe erste Version des Nodes), aber nach einem Blick in https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/playground#values habe ich "firefighter_pole" genommen, da es viermal als eigener Node vorkommt. "climbing_pole" (12x) trifft m. E. die Nutzung nicht, "vertical_sliding_pole" kommt nur 1x vor.
Als ergänzender Tag zu einem Spielgerät (und das dürfte der Normalfall sein) finde ich in Overpass Turbo mit "playground"="firefighter_pole" Einträge in Flöha (Sachsen) und Heverlee; "playground"="sliding_pole" ergibt Fehlanzeige.
Ich weiß nicht, ob es eine eigenständige Diskussion oder ein Proposal wert ist, aber das Spielgerät als solches hat einen Eintrag verdient ...
Gruß, antabeer
mueschel (2021-04-25 11:07:33+00:00): "sliding pole" ist wohl ein gängier Begriff dafür, aber ich bin da auch offen.

In jedem Fall sollte es aber nicht "XY = yes" sein, sondern entweder

playground=XY; ABC (mit Semikolon für mehrere Werte)
oder
playground:XY = yes
antabeer (2021-04-25 11:45:57+00:00): Beim Begriff finde ich in Google annähernd gleich viele Einträge für "sliding pole" und "fireman's pole" (ohne nach Bezug zu Spielplätzen zu schauen). Ist das ein Fall für eine Diskussion mit der Community (da habe ich bisher keine Erfahrung)?

Beim Tag würde ich die Semikolon-Lösung nur ungern wählen, jedenfalls wenn es ein eindeutiges Haupt-Tag (hier "structure") gibt. 
Beim Präfix bin ich offen. Vielleicht irritiert mich hier einfach immer schon das Tag "playground" für ein einzelnes Spielgerät (siehe "playground:theme" für die Beschreibung einer Federwippe). Und ich bin mir völlig unsicher, ob playground:XY bei einem Node mit Primär-Tag playground:structure nicht eigentlich eine Unterebene playground:playground:XY bedeuten würde (ich hätte "XY=yes" in Analogie zu "bin=yes" bei "amenity=bench" u. dgl. gesehen). Hier lasse ich mich gerne belehren.
mueschel (2021-04-25 12:38:57+00:00): Ich denke das wir für so ein Tag keine Diskussion/Proposal brauchen.

Bei der momentanen Nutzung sind sowohl playground=XY; ABC als auch playground:XY semantisch identisch - das ergibt sich im wesentlich aus der Abneigung mancher Mapper gegenüber Listen mit Werten.

Ich wäre dann hier für

playground = structure
playground:slide = yes
playground:sliding_pole = yes

In Präfixe darf man nicht allzuviel hineininterpretieren. Es gibt in OSM ja keinr allgemeine Präfix/Subkey Hierarchie und das Tagging hat sich je nach Thema unterschiedlich entwickelt.
antabeer (2021-04-25 13:08:53+00:00): Kann ich nachvollziehen. Da aber die Verwendung von playground:slide=* außerhalb von leisure=playground (50 von 3580) sehr selten ist, durchforste ich bei Gelegenheit noch einmal das Wiki und das Forum. Bilde mir ein, hier bzgl. Brücken (wohl "Wackelbrücken") einmal etwas gelesen zu haben (das mich möglicherweise inspiriert hat). Wenn ich da nichts finde, übernehme ich Deinen Vorschlag und ziehe auch meine "slide=yes" bei ein paar anderen Spielplätzen glatt.
portalaventura (2021-04-19 19:14:22+00:00): Boas-vindas MARCELO HONAGA, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2021-04-24 12:07:43+00:00): Please check the access tags, 'moy' is a spelling mistake.
Goatosm (2021-04-26 16:22:56+00:00): Thanks for catching that mueschel.  I changed the tag to a motor_vehicle=yes
wrivlin (2021-04-23 17:01:24+00:00): Hi, can you please explain this revert?
clay_c (2021-04-23 17:22:29+00:00): It looks like you added the bus stops to the Metro station's stop_area relation. Instead, create a new stop_area relation for the bus stops and add both stop_area relations to a stop_area_group relation.
portalaventura (2021-04-19 19:20:00+00:00): Boas-vindas HendriqueMacario, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
VictorIE (2021-04-30 20:56:05+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM.

Roads like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/932619550 are best tagged with highway=service and service=driveway https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=driveway

highway=residential should be used for (public) roads shared between a number of houses.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential

Whether the road is shared / private is an important divider between the two.

In rural areas, and very rarely in urban areas, I would use the first option for up to one business / farm and two houses. Otherwise highway=residential or highway=unclassified
user_5359 (2021-04-20 04:07:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node.
SomeoneElse (2022-01-21 10:33:59+00:00): Hello,
Do you know how https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128609899 comments to other roads at the east, and whether cycling on the highway=pedestrial here is allowed?  I noticed some gaps in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/62824 , which in turn led me to this.
Best Regards,
Andy
Mike Baggaley (2021-05-08 07:55:59+00:00): Hi, hope you are having fun mapping, but please note that the names of long distance routes should not be used as the names for individual path segments. The name goes in the route relation. This can be seen at waymarkedtrails.org which uses the OSM data (it is not shown on the standard openstreetmap renderer). Cheers, Mike
mc85eu (2021-05-08 15:29:15+00:00): Good afternoon, Mr Baggaley,

Thanks for your kind message. I have been made aware of this by you (today) and someone called Bernard (forgot his username) about a week ago. I now know not to make similar changes to well-defined, long-distance paths, due to your and Bernard's help. Thank you. I've stopped doing this! :-)

I wasn't aware of the website you cited. My further thanks.

My main OSM-using app is Strava, which overlays OSMaps data. Sadly, Strava does NOT show long-distance relations (ie Offa's Dyke Path); but I'm now assuming the "fix" is Strava altering its code, rather than my renaming small parts of ODP on OSM.

Thanks for your efforts with OSM, and helping newer ones such as myself,
Matthew
Кірыла (2022-05-13 20:28:52+00:00): Доброго времени суток! Уточните, пожалуйста, откуда Вы взяли название пруда?
Антон-1983 (2022-05-15 09:11:37+00:00): https://kurjer.info/2016/04/21/pure-pond/
Хотя уже немного засомневался - ведь в Гоцке два водоёма. Какой имелся ввиду в статье непонятно.
eggie (2021-04-20 09:19:48+00:00): Dag Marc..
 De windmolen even geplaatst volgens de BAG data

MVG
eggie
Paul Berry (2023-09-29 08:18:20+00:00): To map The Coach House, you can just set each address out as:

addr:housenumber=1
addr:street=The Coach House
addr:parentstreet=Parabola Road
addr:city=Cheltenham
addr:postcode=GL50 3BD

addr:housenumber=2
addr:street=The Coach House
addr:parentstreet=Parabola Road
addr:city=Cheltenham
addr:postcode=GL50 3BD

and then delete the associatedStreet relation.
Paul Berry (2023-10-06 15:57:51+00:00): I've now done this on changeset #142239447 but kept the relation.
nickjohnston (2023-10-07 20:52:49+00:00): Thanks for the comment. I made heavy use of associatedStreet relations when adding addresses in Cheltenham, as at the time that was what people on the #osm-gb IRC channel recommended. (Capturing the information was the most important thing; later it could be represented differently if desired.) Now I use addr:parentstreet as you suggest as it's simpler.
Rakkka (2026-06-19 12:22:19+00:00): 多磨霊園の歩道にarea=yes,highway=pedestrianが設定されていますが、area=yes,highway=pedestrianは「広場」で、歩行者はあらゆる方向に自由に移動できるものです。
　多磨霊園の歩道は方向性のある道なので、これには該当しないと思いますがいかがでしょうか。
KKK-jp (2026-06-19 12:52:54+00:00): @Rakkka さん
ご連絡ありがとうございます。

先人の方のタグ付けを見た際、広場以外にも、縁石や段差などでエリアが区別できる歩道（highway=footway）のareaマッピングに使われているケースがあったため、そちらを参考にして設定しておりました。

もし今回のケースで不適切なタグ付けでしたら、お手数ですがご修正いただいて構いません。
（今後は同様のタグ付けは控えるように気をつけます）

ご指摘いただき勉強になりました。ご確認のほどよろしくお願いいたします。
Robert46798 (2021-04-21 10:18:25+00:00): Hallo merlin1969,

vielen Dank für deine Ergänzungen zu OpenStreetMap!

Mir ist aufgefallen, dass du im Draisweg einen Weg angelegt hast und angegeben hast, dieser sei (auch) für Radfahrer vorgesehen (bicycle=designated). Vielleicht hat sich ja in den letzten Wochen etwas geändert, aber als ich das letzte Mal dort war, handelte es sich um einen reinen Fußweg.
Dann sollte der Weg auch alsw Fußweg eingetragen werden. Das auf dem Weg vermutlich viele Fahrradfahrer fahren ist dabei egal. Entscheidend für OSM ist die rechtliche Lage. Vielleicht kannst du das ja noch anpassen. (Sofern da nicht mittlerweile ein Radweg-Schild steht - dann hast du natürlich recht.)

Viele Grüße,
Robert
kylor (2021-04-19 21:21:58+00:00): This is amazing! good work!
portalaventura (2021-04-19 21:25:34+00:00): Boas-vindas andersonnaval, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
user_2066394 (2021-04-20 21:03:20+00:00): Liegt die Bushaltestelle hier richtig?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2468120315