piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SimonBoulanger (2022-09-05 08:10:23+00:00): Bonjour « Trial »

Pour la route à travers le hangar : il s’agit d’un hangar de contrôle douaniers, les flux passent donc dans le hangar.
	Tous les hangars présents sur le Port ont été modélisé selon leur fonctionnement…rien n’est à revoir de ce côté.
	Idem pour les cheminements piétons. (Entretenu par nos services et contrôlés per notre CHSCT)

Pour les noms : il s’agit des noms d’usage connus par l’ensemble des personnels opérant sur le Port…

Merci pour vos retours !
trial (2022-09-05 11:50:06+00:00): Bonjour, pas de souci pour le passage à travers le hangar, c'est juste la modélisation qui pose souci, Cf. https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/SimonBoulanger, il faut sans doute découper le bâti en trois, le centre étant juste building=roof (un building:min_level pourrait aussi convenir), Cf. hhttps://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings#Additional_attributes

Je doute que les opérateurs du port parlent de "Hangar PIF (HPIF)". Ils doivent parler de "Hangar PIF" ou de "HPIF" mais pas les deux en même temps. C'est pour cela que je propose name="Hangar PIF" d'un côté (idéalement name = ce qui est écrit sur le bâtiment si ce n'est pas une ref) et ref, loc_ref ou short_name=HPIF de l'autre : un nom ne doit pas comporter deux noms, on a assez d'alternatives (aussi alt_name par exemple). J'espère avoir été plus clair.
Sinon une fausse manip visiblement : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087448494 (et d'autres) devraient être juste des footway, les attributs des passages piétons sont à laisser sur les passages piétons.
ivanbranco (2022-08-17 16:34:48+00:00): Ciao Janex,

grazie per la modifica :)
Per i numeri di telefono e gli orari c'è una sintassi da seguire però, la puoi visionare sulla wiki di OSM. 

Per gli orari un tool utile è questo: https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Per i numeri telefonici basta che aggiungi il prefisso internazionale volendo.

Buon mapping!
The_Nickname (2022-08-17 12:01:55+00:00): Bavaria 80cm und Bing sind dann beide Outdated und die Straße wurde irgendwann mal abgerissen schätze ich
map per (2022-08-18 16:50:59+00:00): Ich wollts nur nicht still und heimlich löschen
MopenT (2023-03-27 06:57:17+00:00): Tempo 30 ist aufgehoben, es gilt wieder Tempo 50.
user_6110846 (2022-08-21 07:19:04+00:00): stop changing in polish translation to bohdana chmielnickiego 
This is a newly created translation that has not yet taken root in the Polish language. The main translation is still Bogdana Chmielnickiego
iWowik (2022-08-23 06:19:24+00:00): Polski Słownik Biograficzny
Internetowa wersja 
https://www.biogramy.pl/a/biografia/bohdan-zenobi-chmielnicki-wiesz

Further discussion:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125028701
user_5359 (2022-08-18 11:19:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
kubahahaha (2023-02-11 02:10:38+00:00): Jakie jest źródło tej nazwy?
Póki co wycofuję.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237880740
user_5359 (2025-10-15 17:24:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/14468764. What is the mean of the tags
FUNAI:ADR = Goiânia
FUNAI:AREAETNO = I
FUNAI:AREA_HA = 38000
FUNAI:CDOC = Port Decl
FUNAI:CODAREA = 4602
FUNAI:DATADOC = 1996-10-02 00:00:00
FUNAI:DOCUMENTO = Portaria Declaratória
FUNAI:ETAPA = Planejamento demarcação
FUNAI:EXTENSO = Principal
FUNAI:FLUXO = 230
FUNAI:GID = 503
FUNAI:GRUPOS = Ava-Canoeiro
FUNAI:LINKAREA = TI Avá-Canoeiro
FUNAI:NOME_AREA = Avá-Canoeiro
FUNAI:PERIMETRO = 90
FUNAI:SITUACAO = Declarada
FUNAI:TITULO = Portaria nº 598, de 02 de outubro de 1996
Robert Whittaker (2022-09-16 11:55:44+00:00): In this changeset you added "Fulton's Foods" tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052126162 , and a note saying it was under construction and yet to open.

Are you sure that this is (will be) a "Fulton's Foods" store? According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fulton%27s_Foods the stores were all closed earlier this year. So it would be odd if a new one was about to open.
Urbana rimor (2022-09-16 13:08:09+00:00): Thank you for contacting me regarding this mistake, I have fixed this mistake on my half, changing the premise from Fulton to Heron Foods:

https://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/20231957.bolton-heron-foods-announced-new-store-deane/
Robert Whittaker (2022-09-18 16:18:07+00:00): Many thanks!
pesec (2022-08-18 04:57:52+00:00): Добрый день.
В данном случае правильнее было поставить на выезде с территории не запрет левого поворота, а выезд только направо, т.к. по факту установлен дорожный знак.
Frans S (2022-08-29 10:39:46+00:00): Hello. Please do not tag buildings as landuse=building. Just building=yes. 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125015676
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:21:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
Frans S (2022-08-29 10:01:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125016198
Frans S (2022-08-29 10:01:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125016198
Frans S (2022-08-29 10:01:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125016198
Frans S (2022-08-29 10:01:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125016198
Frans S (2022-08-29 10:01:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125016198
Frans S (2022-08-29 10:01:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
E: Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125016198
Frans S (2022-08-29 10:23:10+00:00): Hello I noticed that I send this message 6 times. Sorry for that.
The message system works so slow that I repeatedly pushed the send button with this result. 
Best regards
Langlaeufer (2022-08-17 15:03:41+00:00): Der Radweg verläuft hier mittlerweile auf der Fahrbahn. Nun haben wir hier einen Fußweg mit segerated=yes? - Frage wäre, darf man noch auf dem Fußweg radfahren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125016431
Fra00 (2022-08-17 12:49:22+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, usa Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta, non Esri World Imagery. Le strade sono così disallineate.
eggie (2022-08-17 13:35:27+00:00): Dag ZW   De info heb ik verplaatst naar een node.
We taggen in OSM bij op de aanwezige adesnode.
De spelfout in de straatnaam heb ik gecorrigeerd.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125016617

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:20:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:22:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
RaphaelPasloin (2022-08-17 12:58:47+00:00): Kerkebeek
marczoutendijk (2022-08-17 18:03:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125029621 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:17:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
sazrodrigo (2022-08-18 15:02:26+00:00): Ao invés de criar novas vias, apenas transforme as vias "em construção" em "vias construídas" para evitar elementos duplicados.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125017059
sazrodrigo (2022-08-18 15:02:56+00:00): Ao invés de criar novas vias, apenas transforme as vias "em construção" em "vias construídas" para evitar elementos duplicados.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125017059
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:09:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
marczoutendijk (2022-08-17 18:03:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125029621 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:38:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:08:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
sazrodrigo (2022-08-18 15:01:40+00:00): Ao invés de criar novas vias, apenas transforme as vias "em construção" em "vias construídas" para evitar elementos duplicados.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125017198
GeoMechain_repair (2022-08-17 13:07:25+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125015750, 125015597, 125015549, 125015495, 125015437.
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-18 08:48:06+00:00): It seems you changed the address of this existing building, rather than moving the actual POI--which in any case appears to be only one unit of this building and should be a separate node rather than tagging the entire building with it, is missing any top-level tags describing what it actually is, and has the building:units=* tag used when I _think_ you probably mean addr:unit=*, as well as not using the common name=* of the business (without GmbH).

Therefore, I've had to revert this change, as well as the original. in changeset 184260525

https://osm.org/changeset/184260525

You can add the POI at the new location, provided you are careful to use correct tagging, not reference Google Maps, etc., and tag it as a node rather than the entire building way.
Hufkratzer (2022-08-18 09:15:28+00:00): Hi, I had a look on the website from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9959241690. Thsi doesn't seem to be a horse racing track. Possible Alternative: leisure=horse_riding + sport=equestrian, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:20:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SHARCRASH (2022-09-29 19:11:29+00:00): Bonjour! Plusieurs de vos contributions m'ont attiré l'oeil par leur manque de qualité, désolé de vous le dire, qu'ils soient anciens ou récents. 
Exemples:
www.openstreetmap.org/node/4319548874/history barrière vélo que j'ai corrigé suite à votre changement en v2, ensuite je remarque qu'il était déjà d'origine en cycle_barrier. Le deux sont fondamentalement différents et impliquent un comportement différent par les usagers du chemin. Veuillez respecter le tag adéquat svp. 

www.openstreetmap.org/way/625131466 le chemin passe par le jardin d'une résidence, faites attention que votre image de fond ne soit pas décallée, le les BD Ortho d'IGN n'ont pas besoin de correction) 

www.openstreetmap.org/way/67353810 est grand polygone que vous avez mis en farmyard en v5 alors qu'avant il était en farmland. Vu que les champs sont beaucoup plus grands que les portions de ferme, cela n'a pas été pertinent de votre part de changer. Si vous ne vous sentez pas l'envie de cisailler les portions pour corriger comme je viens de le faire, faut laisser au plus pertinent.

Ce sont des points qui ne demandent pas beaucoup de travail, juste de la connaissance et de l'attention, donc s'il vous plait veuillez en prendre considération pour ne pas désinformer. 

Cordialement,
S
ybis57 (2022-10-04 19:56:22+00:00): Bonjour, 
j'ai bien reçu votre message mais je n'ai pas eu le temps d'y répondre avant.
Je vais vous répondre surtout par rapport à www.openstreetmap.org/node/4319548874/history : en fait j'avais effectué les modifications sur cette portion de piste cyclable (par le biais de JOSM installé sur mon ordi) car depuis pas mal de temps j'avais constaté qu'en traçant mes circuits sur mon ordi et en les envoyant sur mon GPS, la piste cyclable sur laquelle vous aviez placé à juste titre plusieurs barrières, me refusaient le passage avec mon vélo de route. J'utilise Openrunner la dernière version, en mode « cyclisme sur route ». C'est pour cette raison que j'avais modifié l'attribut de ces barrières. Suite à ces modifications le tracé autorisait le passage en cyclo route. J'ai testé à l'instant cela fonctionne toujours même après votre modification. 
Je me souviens également que plusieurs points de cette piste cyclable étaient fusionnés avec une zone « Géographie/Frontière/Administrative » : j’avais donc séparés les points (JOSM me le signalait lorsque j’avais validé avant d’envoyer les données modifiées).

« www.openstreetmap.org/way/625131466 le chemin passe par le jardin d'une résidence » : oui en effet, un peu surpris par cet ajout un peu ancien et pas mal décalé, j’ai rectifié. Je n'ai pas voulu le rattacher au vôtre, car à certains moments de l'année ce chemin est peu praticable en raison de la végétation. Mais c'est discutable.
« www.openstreetmap.org/way/67353810 est grand polygone que vous avez mis en farmyard en v5 alors qu'avant il était en farmland » : j’avoue que je suis très surpris, car en général je ne touche pas à ce que je ne connais pas. 

Pour conclure, j’avoue que vos connaissances sont nettement supérieures aux miennes.
Il faut savoir que je passe parfois pas mal de temps à rechercher sur Internet avant de modifier certains attributs, dans le respects des autres utilisateurs. Pas toujours évident de comprendre quelque chose dans cette jungle.
Mais je trouve l'idée de pouvoir mettre à jour tout ce qu'on peut découvrir sur le terrain en faisant du sport ou en se promenant, absolument formidable. 
Ce qui me plaît avant tout c'est de pouvoir modifier ou rajouter certains chemins ou pistes cyclables que je découvre sur le terrain. Et je me rends compte qu’il y a encore beaucoup de choses à modifier dans ce domaine. Mais j'aimerais savoir s'il existe un moyen de se former davantage en utilisant JOSM par exemple, car tout seul c'est parfois un peu difficile. Je suis prêt à passer le temps nécessaire.
Cordialement,
SHARCRASH (2022-10-11 18:11:07+00:00): Bonsoir,
Merci pour la réponse, même si tardive, c'est toujours plus apprécié et démontre à réel effort de coopération. 

Je comprends votre volonté de pouvoir utiliser vos outils de guidage mais ce sont ces outils qui sont dans l'erreur donc à eux de rectifier le tir. Quand c'est comme ça pour moi ces services ne prennent pas le temps de faire correctement leur outil, donc je change.

Merci pour les rectifications. Pour la visibilité d'un sentier il y a la clé "trail_visibility=*" Je les collerai avec le bon tag.

En effet c'est un réel plaisir de savoir qu'on retrouvera une carte améliorée grâce à nos contributions. Cela fonctionne également comme un aide mémoire avec tous les endroits où nous sommes passés.

Dans Youtube il y a la chaine de Capitainemoustache OSM. Aussi, prenez le temps de regarder les plugins qui existent dans la configuration de JOSM pour installer des nouvelles fonctions. Il y a beaucoup d'outils supplémentaires qui peuvent vous aider à contribuer plus facilement ou pour des fonctions supplémentaires. Regardez aussi du coté des "Map Paint Style" pour visualiser autrement les éléments et ils peuvent s’additionner en cascade.

Bonne continuation! 
Cordialement,
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-08-17 13:17:54+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hov#hov:lanes=*
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:40:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:12:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
hanchao (2022-08-19 09:20:18+00:00): 在建道路应该加在建属性
NieWnen (2022-08-18 07:52:49+00:00): Tag area=yes jest zbędny dla budynków.
limes11 (2022-08-17 15:11:41+00:00): Hallo HWBall,

danke für deine Aktualisierungen hier. 

Bitte dabei keine Pfade löschen. Diese sind mit den entsprechenden Lifecycle-Tags korrekt ausgewiesen. 

Ich nehme diese Änderung zurück.

Viele Grüße, Limes
BCNorwich (2022-08-18 06:57:22+00:00):  Hi, With the exception of Way: 1086970535 I've reverted these changes because you somehow inadvertently dragged lots of existing features out of alignment. All is OK now.

Regards Bernard.
jfothergill (2022-08-18 09:11:45+00:00): OK. Thanks. Are you able to suggest where I might have gone wrong? To the eye it all looked OK.