piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
santamariense (2020-10-13 19:57:10+00:00): Também não marque restrições que são óbvias e desnecessária, como esta https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11722782.
Por que ela é obvia? Porque um roteador jamais ira mandar o usuário na contramão, uma vez que este pedaço de rodovia https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855655412 é mão unica. Entende?
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-07 11:15:21+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11722783

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11722784

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada (possui uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar, e sendo o caso excluir essa relação?
Retired Account (2020-10-23 12:51:06+00:00): Hi,
Your building height has broke rendering of 'Supreme Court of Singapore'.
Retired Account (2020-10-23 12:51:10+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2907160&lon=103.8510140&zoom=18&camera.theta=55.363&camera.phi=37.815
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-07-17 10:05:18+00:00): Is it intentional that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/593166364/history  lost construction=footway?

Mentioning because I added it again.
Noen (2021-07-17 11:21:49+00:00): It was probably by accident.
Glassman (2020-10-06 02:16:19+00:00): areas=yes isn't necessary. If it is a private runway, adding access=private would be appropriate. However, I don't believe I've ever seen one marked as private. When possible try to use tags instead of description.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92010309
dpolovinkin (2024-04-26 00:22:56+00:00): dunno if it will be read, but I wonder why did you put height = 18 to basically all buildings in the districts to the right from Clarke Quay? it is obviously not correct if we look at google map 3d model, many buildings have different heights there...
TheSwavu (2020-10-09 23:29:55+00:00): Is there any particular reason why you don't think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/731269504 is a wetland?
Ewen Hill (2020-10-09 23:55:17+00:00): I would call it a soak or an arid wetland however happy for you to change it to something else if you feel. I initially thought the fence around this was to prevent cattle getting in and bogged or it was a reserve but there is a cattle lot in there. I assume it might be for overnight use.
Ewen Hill (2020-10-09 23:56:09+00:00): Sorry, just re-read your comment and agree with you. Will fix
Glassman (2020-10-06 02:30:27+00:00): Tip: trails are usually mapped as highway=path. highway=footway is more like a sidewalk you'd find in the city. Can you fix it?

I also see someone uploaded gpx traces with no corresponding trail mapped. It's possible Strava has gpx traces that could be useful. At one time it was available as a background in our editors. Strava made some changes so adding in their traces is more difficult. You might find more information on the wiki, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava or Slack. 

I'll send you more info on OSM and how to get on Slack.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92010901
marc__marc (2022-10-20 19:05:25+00:00): Hello,
solar isn't a generator:method, it's a source.
the method is photovoltaic
Can you fix it ?
Regards,
Marc
Hedaja (2022-10-21 15:29:54+00:00): Thank you for noticing

Fixed it

Best,
Christian
marc__marc (2022-10-22 13:04:37+00:00): Thanks you !
aceman444 (2020-10-06 22:39:10+00:00): What "navigation fix" ?
jurajik82 (2020-10-09 22:03:06+00:00): It's about OsmAnd working correctly on OSM data. After I've seen source codes of OsmAnd I think now OsmAnd should be fixed.
Name of changeset only refers to vehicle road here.
aceman444 (2020-10-26 00:04:01+00:00): I mean what does the fixme on thsoe sidewalks mean? What needs to be done there? We can add footway=sidewalk but other than that, what is wrong there? Do you mean to remove embankment=yes from the road and sidewalks and draw the embankment on both sides separately?
jurajik82 (2020-10-26 23:23:27+00:00): Yes, something like that. Either embankment on both sides or embankment as area around 'road with sidewalks' or embankment line with width. Now it looks like 3 separate embankments. But I'm not the one who can decide this. I expect some expert to decide this and write it in wiki.
E.g. Tag:man_made=embankment recommends drawing it on both sides, correctly directed, similar to retaining walls.
aceman444 (2020-10-29 11:11:33+00:00): The wiki is written correctly, there are sometimes multiple ways to do something. embankment=yes on a way is the easy way if there is a single road on top of the embankment. Then adding separate man_made=embankment ways would not add more info and would just be tedious. In the case here adding the ways can be useful, I can do it, thanks.
jurajik82 (2020-10-29 21:42:33+00:00): Thanks.
aceman444 (2020-10-06 22:37:02+00:00): What "navigation fix" was needed here? You just added 1 mostly unneded node to the way.
jurajik82 (2020-10-09 22:10:30+00:00): I reverted this change. I was trying to change angle of road relatively to previous road to make OsmAnd speak when navigating to right. That was before I looked at OsmAnd source codes.
Retired Account (2020-10-23 12:56:38+00:00): Hi,
Your incorrect building height has broke the rendering for 'Suntec Towers'.
Retired Account (2020-10-23 12:56:41+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2964817&lon=103.8590899&zoom=18&camera.theta=45.05&camera.phi=-21.59
Retired Account (2020-10-23 12:59:15+00:00): Hi,
Your incorrect building height for swimming pool has broken the rendering of 'Marina Bay Financial Centre'.
Retired Account (2020-10-23 12:59:24+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2775859&lon=103.8541941&zoom=18&camera.theta=52.785&camera.phi=149.724
Retired Account (2020-10-23 12:28:08+00:00): Hi,
Your incorrect building height addition has broke the rendering of 'The Treasury'.
Retired Account (2020-10-23 12:28:15+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2917398&lon=103.8494330&zoom=19&camera.theta=57.368&camera.phi=19.481
Retired Account (2020-10-23 12:29:03+00:00): Hi,
Your incorrect building height addition has broke the rendering of 'Peninsula Plaza'.
Retired Account (2020-10-23 12:29:08+00:00): https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=1.2929702&lon=103.8505379&zoom=19&camera.theta=48.487&camera.phi=17.475
rledezma (2020-10-31 16:20:51+00:00): Hi, Could I possibly revert these changes creating the broken render?
skquinn (2023-06-08 06:53:33+00:00): This Walgreens actually has an address on Calder Avenue. In the future, please don't enter the street name if you don't know 100% for sure.
5m4u9 (2020-10-06 22:53:27+00:00): Sorry, I revert this changeset because you move aerialway route :(...
Timmy_Tesseract (2020-11-05 22:30:36+00:00): Good day. Assessing the classification of roads can be difficult from aerial imagery alone. The two segments in this changeset are very rough roads that are almost exclusively used by residents. Please check way histories to see if existing classifications might be sourced from on the ground mapping.  Thanks!
TaraRiverCanyon (2020-11-06 23:08:57+00:00): Hi Timmy_Tesseract, Thank you for reaching out and providing your local knowledge. It appears the tertiary classification for www.openstreetmap.org/way/539317931 may also be more appropriately modeled as an unclassified. Do you think this should also be downgraded to unclassified?
Timmy_Tesseract (2020-11-10 23:14:31+00:00): Hi TaraRiverCanyon, Tawan-tawan is a very populous village with nearly 4000 residents. The way that you are referring to is of equal significance as any other parts of its tertiary road network.
TaraRiverCanyon (2020-11-12 01:33:30+00:00): Hi Timmy_Tesseract, Thank you for your consideration and providing your local knowledge.
user_4493657 (2020-10-07 10:26:30+00:00): Cześć. Podoba mi się, że poprawiasz mapę, jednak mam małą prośbę do ciebie mianowicie prosiłbym cię o "niesklejanie" ze sobą obszarów i linii w tym przypadku dróg z polami i lasami, ponieważ utrudnia to dalszą ich edycje. Pozdrawiam.
chodzieznamapach (2020-10-07 11:02:31+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za uwagę. Faktycznie drogi polne i leśne czasem były złączane z obszarami. Postaram się na przyszłość tego nie robić. Pozdrawiam
mueschel (2020-10-08 10:21:54+00:00): Please check this import. There is a huge number of waterways with a foreign tag 'StreamOrder'.
s8evq (2020-10-06 07:24:23+00:00): Dag AndriesP,

Bedankt voor deze edit. Een kleine opmerking. Als de weg momenteel op access=no stond, en je wil wel toegang geven, dan is het beter om deze "access=no" gewoon te verwijderen. Beter zet je die niet op "access=yes", omdat je met die "yes" eigenlijk toegang geeft voor allen (ook auto's etc...). Ik heb het aangepast.
Wulf4096 (2020-10-09 09:50:03+00:00): Hallo schueszel,
dort gibt es eine ausgeschilderte Reitfurt.
Warum löschst du diese?

Wenn du Ideen für besseres Tagging hast, dann lass hören.
Wenn das Tagging so passt, dich dein Navi aber durch einen Fluss schicken will (und du gerne trocken bleibst), dann ist das ein Problem der Navi-Software.
schueszel (2020-10-09 18:51:28+00:00): Hallo, entschuldige bitte. Ich war jüngst an der Glockenhausbrücke, habe von dort aber die Schilder nicht gesehen. Und in den Eigenschaften des Weges hatte ich offenbar die Furt übersehen. Damit war da für mich ein Weg über die Bille, ohne dass da ein Steg oder eine Brücke war. 

Jetzt habe ich die Reitfurt wieder eingesetzt. Schau gerne noch einmal drauf.

VG
Jan
Wulf4096 (2020-10-11 01:51:05+00:00): Okay! Ich hab deine beiden Änderungen trotzdem mal rückgängig gemacht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92290282), um die Historie wiederherzustellen; https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik

Wenn du dir unsicher bist, schau gerne mit welchem Änderungssatz etwas in die Datenbank reingekommen ist und frag dann dort nach. Das wäre hier z. B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88263543 gewesen.

Schöne Grüße!
schueszel (2020-10-13 19:06:47+00:00): Hallo, müsste nicht der Punkt im Kreuzungspunkt von Gewässer und Pfad mit ford=yes markiert werden?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:ford%3Dyes

VG
Wulf4096 (2020-10-13 19:19:42+00:00): Siehe dort Unterpunkt "Gebrauch als Weg".
Dort steht nicht, dass der Kreuzungspunkt das Tag haben soll, sondern der Weg. Und das hab ich so gemacht.
Das deckt sich auch mit der englischen Version.
s8evq (2020-11-06 13:22:59+00:00): Dag AndriesP, Vandaag was ik in Bulskampveld en heb de toegankelijkheid nagekeken van de wegen dat jij in deze changeset op access=no gezet had. Ik heb overal access=no moeten verwijderen, want deze wegen zijn gewoon toegankelijk. Er is ter plaatse geen enkel bordje te zien. De gele wandeling passeert zelfs hier. Moest ik iets over het hoofd gezien hebben, laat gerust weten. Want jij zult wellicht beter op de hoogte zijn van de toegankelijkheid dat Westtoer wenst te hebben dan ik. :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92022537
Jakka (2020-10-07 06:51:46+00:00): de verwijderde wegen stonden gecodeerd als private..... Als deze niet binnen een omheinde afsluiting staan, kunnen deze dienst doen als herkenningspunt, oriëntatie ......
joost schouppe (2020-10-07 12:57:19+00:00): Beste,
Zoals Jakka aangaf was het niet nodig om deze te verwijderen. De bewoners hadden dit reeds gevraagd via https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2304935 . Op die plaats leggen we uit waarom we dit niet doen. Ik stel daarom voor dat we uw changeset terugdraaien.
pesec (2020-10-06 09:51:12+00:00): Для чего вы расставили данные запреты разворота?
1. Данных знаков запрета там не установлено.
2. Назовите мне ситуацию, когда вам может понадобиться развернуться при выезде с прилегающей территории?
3. Согласно ПДД данный разворот не запрещен, но осуществляется поворотом направо, движением задним ходом (это не перекресток) и поворотом обратно направо.
Taxist23061982 (2020-10-07 11:47:56+00:00): Согласно этому пункту с учетом отсылок к пункту 8.11, движение задним ходом запрещается:в местах с видимостью дороги хотя бы в одном направлении менее 100 м а в этих местах видимость явно менее 100 м!
pesec (2020-10-08 04:09:27+00:00): То, что регламентируется ПДД, не обязательно должно вноситься в карту. Вы просто перегрузите её излишней и очевидной информацией.
Не забывайте, что объем влияет на скорость работы навигационных программ.
Stalker61 (2020-10-08 06:10:58+00:00): Что-то у вас явный перебор с рестрикшенами.
chnav (2020-10-08 06:26:58+00:00): Картографирование под навигатор или программу диспетчеризации. При отсутствии знаков зароета разворота действуют ПДД по-умолчанию. Автоматизируйте свою систему диспетчиризации, чтобы она учитывала ПДД, обратитесь к разработчику. Пожалуйста учтите, что всё, что вы вносите месяцами, может быть откачено относительно быстро. Пожалуйста не тратьте своё и наше время.
Something B (2020-10-20 22:43:48+00:00): Бессмысленность разворотов в таких случаях очевидна. Если инструмент построения маршрута строит маршрут с разворотом с прилегающих проездов, это недостаток его алгоритма.
SGorskiy (2020-10-21 04:02:25+00:00): Односторонки часто делают двухсторонними. При смене статуса запрет разворота останется.
pesec (2020-10-21 04:05:12+00:00): В данном случае односторонки являются линками развязки и точно не поменяют статус.
pesec (2020-10-21 04:05:34+00:00): Откатывать нужно эту правку.
Taxist23061982 (2020-10-24 14:39:01+00:00): Так же если установлен знак поворот на лево запрещён, то запрещён и разворот! Не помню кто, ссылался на старые фото данной развязки, и на этой развязке везде установлены знаки либо 4.1.2 либо 3.18.2 при установке которых РАЗВОРОТ ЗАПРЕЩЁН!!!
pesec (2020-10-06 06:44:48+00:00): Выезд есть и его прекрасно видно на фото:
https://www.car72.ru/images/photo/2020/08/47805.jpg
https://www.car72.ru/images/photo/2020/08/47811.jpg
Cebderby (2020-10-06 23:25:00+00:00): In this and your previous 8 edits in London, you trashed all the office, amenity, religion, shop, brand and building:part tags on all the many buildings you touched, removing places of worship, offices and countless restaurants, shops etc.  You also trashed the 3d modelling of various well modelled landmarks eg the monument to the great fire.   Additionally, you added meaningless layer values to a number of buildings (presumably due to iD's bad proposal of this as any kind of 'fix' for perceived overlaps).
All the height values you added were dubious at best, typically twice that expected where building:levels info is present.
Accordingly all these 9 changesets are reverted, and changes of this nature cannot and will not be tolerated.
Sowa1980 (2021-02-13 18:12:06+00:00): Привет, а что это такое, что это делает в адресе?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/855761174/history#map=19/51.72072/103.68074
Tomas Straupis (2020-10-07 07:15:28+00:00): Atkabinau Puškino mokyklą nuo greta esančių kelių. Tai nėra susiję objektai, tai geometrijos neturėtų dengtis.
DD1GJ (2020-10-06 10:48:33+00:00): Hallo Thomas,

willkommen bei OSM und danke für die Korrektur der Bank. Ich habe den Doppeleintrag und die im Projekt verpönte Werbeprosa entfernt. Zusätzlich habe ich die Firma korrekt als Werbeagentur eingetragen. Wir freuen uns auf weitere sachliche und neutrale Verbesserungen  der OSM-Daten. Die SEO-üblichen Tricks sind allerdings verpönt.

Bei der OSM-Karte auf Deiner Kontaktseite fehlt noch die korrekte Attributierung, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright

Weitere Informationen stehen z.B. unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
Basstoelpel (2020-10-07 15:59:37+00:00): Hallo pbkawph,

Transformatorhaus ist kein Eigenname. Die Eigenschaft hast Du schon anders angegeben. Interessant ist aber der Betreiber (operator) und dessen Referenznummer od -name (ref=.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
joost schouppe (2021-09-30 05:38:59+00:00): Is this really a caravan site? I think it's just a regular parking where you are allowed to put a camper - during the day only
map per (2021-09-30 08:45:30+00:00): I am not 100% sure anymore as I was there on year ago. But I think that the ticket machine sold overnight tickets for motorhomes. If thats wrong or different by now feel free to delete the caravan site
joost schouppe (2021-09-30 10:38:51+00:00): Thanks! I wasn't sure I'd make it myself, but I was just there and it is in fact allowed to go ark a camper (rare in the area!) but you need to leave by 9pm. I'll make the necessary updates.
jmaspons (2020-10-06 16:42:53+00:00): El camí de can Feu fa referència a la masia que hi ha al sud-est de la casa que has anomenat com a can Feu, prop de la depuradora. Segur que en diuen així d'aquesta casa?
jqngarcia (2020-10-07 05:31:08+00:00):  M'he passat de frenada, estava revisant places sense nom i l'he editat malament trrno a deixar-ho com abans

JQN
jmaspons (2020-10-07 07:53:51+00:00): Potser seria millor afegir el polígon dels edificis en comptes de posar un place=isolated_dwlling? O també surt la nota a OSMI si els polígons no tenen nom?
jmaspons (2020-10-07 07:57:44+00:00): Ara veig que ja ho has fet així :)

Per aprendre. Si no té nom millor poligon?
jqngarcia (2020-10-07 07:58:32+00:00): Es l'aternativa, isolated sense nom no agrada, millor un building amb name o sense, així queda mes detallat
RicoElectrico (2020-10-06 11:05:07+00:00): Cześć, przypadkiem przesunąłeś węzeł drogi:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92030090

 Naprawiam to, ale proszę o uważność w przyszłości ;)
KFbydpol (2020-10-06 11:41:14+00:00): Ok, przepraszam i dziękuję za czujność i poprawkę. Będę uważał. Pozdrawiam
ndm (2020-10-06 20:04:07+00:00): Bing Streetside shows this as a footway connecting to a pedestrian crossing.
kukarana (2020-10-07 06:12:13+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have misinterpreted the foot way as a service road. thanks for the quick correction. going forward, i will make sure to check all the available imagery before adding any new roads. once again, thanks for the correction. always happy to learn from the community.
yrtimiD (2021-09-12 19:37:19+00:00): Hi and welcome, small note: when you add name tag please put local name used by most civilians in the area in the "name" tag, and other languages in the name:he, name:en, etc. If you can't fill the local name, just add only relevant name:* tag and other mappers will complete.
dval (2020-10-06 09:26:25+00:00): Hi, Energizer1986! Вы изменили класс отрезков дорог до ЛПУ. Они, конечно, не service., но также и не tertiary. Правильно, имхо, было до правки Mir76 - unclassified.
eggie (2020-10-06 09:04:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

-------------------------


Review.. Alleen name= Picasse zal niets doen. Ook de aard van de instelling toevoegen.
bv office=company  of een meer toegesneden tag. Zie wiki.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-06 09:34:47+00:00): tagging aangepast naar offce=company
eggie (2020-10-06 09:37:29+00:00): Typo. ) office=company
Ricolvb (2020-10-06 11:03:20+00:00): Dank Eggie. Ik hoop dat het zo goed is.
groeten, Rico
eggie (2020-10-06 11:24:48+00:00): Vast wel.. rendering duurt altijd even
eggie (2020-10-06 08:31:36+00:00): Dag Nightfalls... Goed bezig!
Ga na of Koeienspeeltuin de officiële naam is.
Wanneer we die naam alleen in de buurt bezigen door de omwonenden taggen we loc_name=  ipv name.
Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
eggie
Nightfalls (2020-10-06 08:38:30+00:00): Heb het aangepast.
eggie (2020-10-06 09:15:35+00:00): Maar waarschijnlijk niet ge-upload?
Koeienspeeltuin staat er nog?
Nightfalls (2020-10-06 09:18:22+00:00): Als het goed is zou hij nu aangepast moeten zijn
eggie (2020-10-06 09:23:31+00:00): In het begin is dat mapppen lastig.
Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed. je hebt nu getagd
loc_name=   (=)  Koeienspeeltuin
maar je hoeft dat = teken niet te typen.. Dat komt er vanzelf.
De "key" is dus loc_name  zonder =
Kijk je nog even?
Eggie
Nightfalls (2020-10-06 09:25:32+00:00): Nu zou hij dus goed moeten zijn.
eggie (2020-10-06 09:40:40+00:00): Het klopt... :)
muzirian (2023-10-30 14:08:11+00:00): Thanks for mapping on osm.
I have noticed you have added some highway crossings unnecessarily.
please refer to wiki for the right use, also join osmkerala on matrix/telegram for join other mappers on discussions
eggie (2020-10-06 08:33:54+00:00): Hi jorg... Why a difference in the names?

Greetz,
eggie
amenity		=restaurant
cuisine		american
internet_access		wlan
name		American sparibs
name:en		American spareribs
name:nl		American spareribs
eggie (2020-10-06 08:35:36+00:00): name=  what will render on the map.
name=nl is use outside the Netherlands. 
I don't think there will be a different name in English for a restaurant. 
Please have a look again.
eggie (2020-10-06 09:01:24+00:00): name corrected
lakedistrict (2020-10-06 13:16:24+00:00): Hi, thanks for your contributions. Unfortunately the Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta is out of date in this area. Bing is the latest imagery available. Please can you amend your changeset, using Bing imagery? Thanks :)
jamenimm (2020-10-07 05:19:52+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, I have missed checking the latest imagery. Thanks for the suggestions. please find the changeset (92081566) for the suggested modifications I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to strictly follow it in my future edits. Always happy to learn from community.
lakedistrict (2020-10-08 13:08:16+00:00): Not a problem, thank you for fixing so quickly :-)
dval (2020-10-06 09:50:03+00:00): Здесь не совсем понятно, зачем вы переклассифицировали track в unclass. Какой смысл?
muzirian (2020-11-09 20:55:49+00:00): Hi, try to map whats on ground, don't map or tag for validators
naveenpf (2020-10-09 07:37:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92032171
WoodWoseWulf (2020-10-07 08:59:28+00:00): Hi Paolo!
You added a park tag to this farmland: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/699156927
I'm not sure if I understand your thought process here?
mueschel (2020-10-08 15:52:35+00:00): Please check your edits of the past days. You added hundreds of buildings with a 'buildings' tag instead of the correct 'building'.
marcoSt (2020-10-09 10:22:04+00:00): Hallo RBOCity, 

dieses extra Tagging bei der ref-Nummer ist nicht nötig, da die Zuordnung, zu welchen Busnetzwerk die Linie gehört, mit den Tag "network" abgedeckt ist. 

Ich werde das Ganze wieder zurücksetzen.

Viele Grüße 

Marco
RBOCity (2020-10-09 19:41:03+00:00): Moin Marco, 
Danke für die Erläuterungen. Grundsätzlich hast du natürlich recht, ich hatte mich nur über die Darstellung in der ÖPNV-Karte gewundert, wo diese Linien eben nicht differenziert werden und aussehen wie normale Stadtbuslinien. Das kann in Städten wie Hamburg sehr verwirrend sein, wenn die jeweiligen Liniennummern auch im Stadtbusnetz existieren. Aber vermutlich müsste man hier eher mit dem Ersteller der ÖPNVKarte überlegen, ob man den Betreiber bei Fernbussen noch in die Darstellung mit einbezieht, wenn die ref hierfür nicht der geeignete Wert ist.
Viele Grüße
Ben
mueschel (2020-10-10 09:38:15+00:00): Hi,
you introduced several new keys here,
multipurpose, commercial, Commercial, comercial

Please consider user the established 'building;use' tag instead:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=building%3Ause#values