piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2022-10-28 09:22:21+00:00): Hi bekirucarci,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue marker):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=30.04378&lat=39.38367&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1
Have a look at way 561221831 here:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128041446

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-01 07:30:02+00:00): Hi bekirucarci, 
this errors still exits, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2022-11-05 07:28:19+00:00): Hi bekirucarci, 
due to your missing response I have reverted this changeset to fix those issues.
Guido
EdLoach (2022-10-25 16:26:12+00:00): It looks like you've merged an abandoned:railway way with a highway=footway way, which now leaves an erroneous name, start_date and end_date on the footpath way, which probably wasn't the intention. I'm not sure what you were aiming for, so haven't just reverted the changes.
Mauls (2022-10-26 12:58:30+00:00): I was demerging, not merging - those dates were on there from the previous merge. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160291839/history
EdLoach (2022-10-26 15:40:35+00:00): Oh yes, my apologies. Thanks for fixing it too (though I might also remove the name, as it isn't the name of the footpath).
aTarom (2022-10-25 16:03:13+00:00): Hola arte2002, si no m'equivoco les dates van separades per "-" Any-Mes-Dia, et sembla bé canviar-ho

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9583913279/history

Salutacions
arte2002 (2022-10-25 21:36:57+00:00): D'acord, rectificat
adiatmad (2022-10-26 05:25:55+00:00): Good day, Ashim Paudel! Your edit looks awesome. But you have some crossing issues, for example (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106847502), (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106847500), and (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106847498). Allow me to suggest you double-check before uploading to OSM. Happy mapping!
Ashim Paudel (2024-02-12 12:59:22+00:00): Thank you for your feedback. I will keep in mind next time.
CedCed (2022-10-25 14:13:12+00:00): Fixed traffic light way in modification 128042469
Alexmol (2022-11-25 16:53:08+00:00): Olá, o posto de carregamento é operado pela Iberdrola, não pela Mercadona.
MxxCon (2022-10-26 04:45:01+00:00): Hello.
Why did you delete this? That is indeed railway area..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128042773
Mashin (2022-10-25 15:54:04+00:00): Hi, thanks for working on roads improvements in CT, but I see a few problems here.
I don't think that a commercial map is authoritative how the roads should be named. And secondly, any maps even on internet are copyrighted and copying information from them (whether it is google maps or mailamap) into OSM is not OK.

You can use public domain sources from government like https://portal.ct.gov/DOT/PP_SysInfo/Functional-Classification-Maps or those provided in iD editor like Bing Streetside or Mapillary. You can find them in the side menu "Map data" or when you press U.

But important is what is on the ground through a survey. For example this Lockwood Road turns out to be Wayside Lane which is posted on the road sign: https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=41.281554%7E-73.415384&lvl=17.0&v=2&sV=1&style=x&dir=293.5&pi=-2

Since you are editing roads, few more things:
1) Please don't create descriptive names like "(PRIVATE)". Use "ownership=private" tag
2) Don't use abbreviated names like "Rd" or "Ave", but spell the full name.
3) Before changing road classification please consult https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Connecticut/Highway_classification wiki page or user jnighan who spent  quite some time on the current classification in CT.

Cheers
impiaaa (2022-10-25 19:54:39+00:00): These roads aren't part of the main road network. How can they be considered living streets?
impiaaa (2022-10-25 20:09:13+00:00): Also, please use descriptive changeset comments. Here is some guidance: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-25 14:53:06+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 127966728, 127967548, 127967756, 127967765, 127995023, 127995345, 127995702, 128001024, 128001442, 128001563, 128002338, 128007671.
Alexey Vazhnov (2024-01-04 10:44:27+00:00): They moved in 2022 from https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9767904379
bxl-forever (2022-10-25 16:05:52+00:00): No youtube spam, please!
The website tag is for the official website of a facility.
This change has been reverted.
KronosTheLate (2023-09-06 07:13:12+00:00): Swesome work! Several of the motorways on which there are tolls are not tagged with `toll=yes`, meaning that routing applications do not avoid them. Would it be possible to automate the process of making a cut at the next and previous nodes of the motorway, and tag the cut-out section automatically?
For reference:
Discussion on incorrect routing in Organic maps: https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps/issues/5902
Relevant wiki artikkel: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ahighway%3Dtoll_gantry
Sitat fra artikkel: "The way that the node is placed on must also be tagged with toll=yes on any applicable road segments."
haukep (2022-10-25 18:44:14+00:00): Hallo DonMarcello,

willkommen bei OSM. Danke für deine Bearbeitungen. Es wäre super, wenn du etwas aussagekräftigere Beschreibungen für die Changesets wählen könntest - das erlaubt den Leuten, die sich über die aktuellen Changesets informiert halten, ein schnelleres Verständnis der durchgeführten Änderungen.

Bezüglich dieses Changesets: Um was für eine Art von Piratenschiff handelt es sich hier? In dieser Gegend gibt es sicherlich kein Piratenschiff im Sinne eines Freizeitparks geben - daher müsste vermutlich ein anderes Tagging gefunden werden.

Beste Grüße
Supaplex (2022-10-26 02:48:50+00:00): 不加到 name 裡?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128044601
Bustycat (2022-10-26 03:01:13+00:00): 等換過去了再加
bxl-forever (2022-10-25 16:13:18+00:00): Police station already on the map.
This change has been reverted.
Langlaeufer (2022-10-25 16:05:08+00:00): Hallo Synchron.
Bitte die Zufahrt zwischen den Garagen nicht löschen. Bitte auch nicht die Verbindung zu anderen Wegen nicht löschen. Landuse=garages ist keine Verkehrsfläche und nicht navierbar. Landuse=garages beschreibt die gesamte Fläche inklusive Garagengebäude und nicht nur den Hof.

Grüße Langläufer
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128045438
bxl-forever (2022-10-26 00:07:46+00:00): Hello,

Adding addresses to building is fine but if you do that, please ensure you write the name correctly.  It must match the street name exactly as written on the map, otherwise, the house may not be matched with the existing data and your change will raise lots of warnings.

"hertogenlaan" entirely in lower case is not correct.  I see you are using StreetComplete, it can help you doing that by tapping on the road when you fill an address.

Hope this helps.
Benoît C MdP (2022-10-31 09:23:25+00:00): Bonjour Vardyger,

Je n'ai pas compris d'où vient cette bande cyclable https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25471515 que tu as ajoutée. Il n'y a rien de spécifique pour les cyclistes puisque la zone correspond à un arrêt de bus. 
Bonne continuation

Benoît
Vardyger (2022-10-31 13:37:11+00:00): Bonjour Benoît,

Effectivement je n'ai pris en compte que le fait que la zone empiétait sur la bande cyclable du reste de la rue. Merci d'avoir corrigé !

Bonne continuation également
silversurfer83 (2022-10-26 07:24:56+00:00): Moin :)
Du hast dem Weg im Wald (sieht auf dem Luftbild zumindest so aus) den Namen "Neuer Weg" gegeben. Steht dort ein Schild, welches diesen Weg auch tatsächlich so ausweist?
Bitte um Antwort

-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128046663
silversurfer83 (2022-10-26 07:49:51+00:00): Noch eine Frage: Du hast dort "access=no" gesetzt. Daher würde mich die Beschilderung des Weges allgemein interessieren. Gibt es dort Schilder? Wenn ja, was steht da wirklich drauf? Ist dies ein Privatweg von Hessenforst?
bkil (2022-11-30 17:56:30+00:00): Amelyik padhoz asztal is tartozik annak a jele https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table
literan (2022-10-26 16:56:58+00:00): и зачем теги на контур дома ставить?
 вряд ли ваш офис занимает все квартиры этого многожтажного дома.

Откачу, поставьте точку с тегами вашего офиса в нужном месте
habi (2022-10-26 08:36:36+00:00): Hallo Parania88.
Cool hast du hier eine erste Änderung in OpenStreetMap gemacht.
Wenn möglich, ist es gut, einen angepassten Changeset-Kommentar anzugeben, damit die anderen User:Innen einfach erkennen, was du beigetragen hast.
'Hofladen eingetragen' wäre z.B. ein passender Kommentar gewesen :)
Gruss aus Bern und viel Spass beim weiteren Mappen!
habi
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128048164
HellMap (2023-10-14 20:37:45+00:00): Hello,

Can I ask how you determined that the fences you drew are here? For example, this fence https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106880261 crosses a building or this fence https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106880266 seems to go through the middle of property. It looks like these are just drawn on top of the cadaster plot borders.

Thanks
aixbrick (2022-10-25 16:59:43+00:00): Nochmal der eindringliche Hinweis, damit aufzuhören, ansonsten werde ich ein Sperre des Accounts veranlassen.
Emilius123 (2022-10-26 20:53:23+00:00): ehrenmann
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:02:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
SHARCRASH (2022-10-25 17:26:23+00:00): + noexit added, barriers updated
watmildon (2023-08-22 03:04:58+00:00): Hilariously enough this revert caught this place node that actually does have the name Pond! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/153647080/history

I've patched it up as part of a bigger cleanup but thought you may find it amusing.
watmildon (2025-11-16 06:25:33+00:00): 2 years later and I found one more. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/174713660

Amusing to me. I hope you are well. Happy mapping.
marczoutendijk (2025-11-16 10:35:38+00:00): Waiting for the next one!
oba510 (2022-10-26 05:58:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/150963254/history appears to be a valid place name.
marczoutendijk (2022-10-26 06:52:17+00:00): Thanks for notifying me. Restored.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128067101
matheusgomesms (2022-11-03 16:10:02+00:00): Olá, tudo bem?

Parabéns pelas excelentes adições ao OSM! Uma dúvida, qual a origem desses dados? Poderíamos acessar também para adicionar essas informações em outros estados?

Att,
Matheus
Florestas Osm (2022-11-04 20:06:02+00:00): Olá, os dados foram obtidos no Qgis por vetorização de imagens dos satélites CBERS-4A e Sentinel e alguns ortomosaicos levantados por drone. No momento foco está na região sul do país.
matheusgomesms (2022-11-07 11:13:42+00:00): Obrigado pelo rápido retorno! Teria alguma maneira de termos esses dados para outras regiões do país? Vi algum tutorial na wiki, mas não sei se é o mesmo processo que você segue para gerar esses dados.
marczoutendijk (2023-02-01 15:38:55+00:00): Hi LAURCANN,
The correct way of tagging a body of water (like a pond) is
natural=water
water=pond
The surface tag shouldn't be used for that!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106892663
I changed it for you.
map per (2022-11-10 20:55:45+00:00): Hallo drellinger,

Grundstückszufahrten habe normalerweise keinen Namen. Heißt diese Zufahrt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106892965) wirklich Untere Bachstraße oder heißt nur die angrenzende highway=residential so?

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
drlellinger (2022-11-11 07:25:22+00:00): Hab in diesem Fall das Schema von den anderen Wegen übernommen vor allem weil da mehrere Hausnummern über diesen Zufahrtsweg erschlossen werden.
drlellinger (2022-11-11 07:25:52+00:00): Würde aber in anderen Fällen dies genauso unterlassen…
drlellinger (2022-11-11 07:27:22+00:00): Auch ins Gewicht für diese Entscheidung ist gefallen dass die Straße ab Hausnummer 49 eine Privatstraße ist aber den Charakter einer ortsstraße hat
user_3022894 (2022-10-26 21:07:34+00:00): Hallo Stefan,

Hi,
bitte nicht erschrecken, ich wollte nur kurz Bescheid geben, schön, dass es auch weiterhin so gut klappt, die Gebäudepunkte in Lüdenscheid nach dem NRW-Orthofoto bzw. ALKIS zu positionieren.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
richlv (2022-12-07 12:38:44+00:00): Heya, thank you for the great map improvements :)

In this changeset, some name=* tags were added to buildings - but those were just addresses.
In OSM, address tags are structured in addr:street and addr:housenumber tags, among others.
Names are used only for objects that actually have names.

I've removed addresses-as-names from some buildings, and if you spot any other places like that, please feel free to remove them as well.
In Latvia, address data is imported from official VZD data, thus any address related issues are best discussed in the community, for example, the Signal group: https://signal.group/#CjQKIBQDZFRYENhgTzY0czaSnYxt6-NCXdW5Rp2o6144bO4wEhCUSXKPmsjKnTbzUgLj0MpL .

Thank you again for improving the map - if any questions arise, please don't hesitate to ask them here or in the group chat :)
streckenkundler (2022-10-25 19:49:52+00:00): Hei,

Oh, geht es da vorwärts? Sehr schön!

Ich komme nicht allzu oft in diese Ecke. Wenn du da hin kommst: achte mal im Bereich Ullersdorf, südlich, östlich und westlich davon auf Fahrradknotenpunkte... Ich erwarte da eine Einbindung des Heideradweges ins Knotennetz LDS und Verbindung zum Netz SPN!° 
An Fotos von Radwegweisern und so bin ich immer interessiert!
Danke in viele Grüße aus Lübben,

Sven
Oderradler (2022-10-27 16:19:22+00:00): Hallo sven, ich habe nur den letzten Streckenteil von Ullerdorf bis Weichensdorf gezeichnet. Dort gibt es keine Knotenpunktbeschilderung. Oder-Spree mach meines Wissens da auch noch nicht mit. Aber in Preilack am Beginn des Heideradweges steht ein Schild Nr. 65. Zu sehen ist das in meiner Komoottour.
https://www.komoot.de/tour/955715035
An der Wegzeichnung stört mich, dass man immer ziemlich weit hineinzoomen muss um überhaupt den Weg zu sehen, geht das besser?
gscholz (2022-10-27 05:27:50+00:00): Hi alliegeglia1,
this changeset has created several errors int the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128051350

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
Langlaeufer (2022-10-26 09:19:34+00:00): Habe die Fußwege verbunden.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128051835
traveleditor (2022-10-25 21:01:11+00:00): Hello, thank you for your contributions, but you cannot use Google Maps (its' data, satellite, street view and etc) for mapping in OSM due to copyright.
Alam malik (2022-10-26 18:38:05+00:00): i own this business and want to know how to add business on osm
literan (2022-10-26 16:52:13+00:00): Пицца Хат это не ресторан. Не надо от балды ставить теги, предлагаемые некачественным редактором
Xvtn (2022-10-25 22:47:06+00:00): Wow, I had no idea the "tree row" feature existed. Nice!!
flohoff (2022-10-26 08:35:02+00:00): Moin,
ich hab hier so meine Schmerzen mit der Fläche um die Halle hier:

https://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/tmp/20221026/Screenshot_from_2022-10-26_10-32-42.png

Die hier:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764006704

Das ist ja kein "landuse=grass" sondern das gehört zu dem Hof - also landuse=farmyard. Da liegen Silageballen und die Zufahrt. Da wächst ja nirgends Gras.

Und wie man an der Oberfläche sieht ist ja auch noch 2-3m um die Halle eher Landuse=farmyard und ackerland. D.h. die Fläche ist IMHO viel zu eng geschnitten.

Flo
PavelChekov (2022-10-31 19:49:27+00:00): Moin,
ja, ich hab das auch so übernommen und nur ein bisschen geschoben. Das ist schon Gras dadrunter, aber prinzipiell trotzdem landwirtschaftlich genutzte Fläche. Gehört allerdings nicht zu dem Hof, aber zu einem.
Paul
Glassman (2022-10-26 22:21:20+00:00): Can you verify that this house is a cafe? It looks just like the rest of the residential houses. Usually cities limit zoning in residential neighborhoods.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128053623
kartler175 (2022-10-26 08:40:15+00:00): Multipolygonee dienen der Erfassung von Flächenobj3kten, sie sind kein Sammlung von berlieben Objekten.
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=10.01879&lat=53.53655&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
highflyer74 (2022-10-27 05:01:45+00:00): Ich habe hier nochmal einen selbstüberschneidenden Weg repariert.

@flor!an: zusätzlich zu dem, was @kartler175 sagte: die ganze Ecke ist voll von nicht unerheblichen Fehlern. Wenn du dir das mal in JOSM anschaust, "haut" er dir das um die Ohren. Selbst "iD" meldet (siehe oben) diverse Geometriefehler. Sei so nett, das etwas anzupassen und dich vor allem auch mit der Funktionsweise von Multipolygonen vertraut zu machen. Diese sollten nur verwendet werden, wenn eine einfachere Darstellung nicht möglich ist.

Viele Grüße!
silversurfer83 (2022-10-26 15:23:46+00:00): Please quit it! You're creating useless double entries!
Glassman (2022-10-26 22:23:49+00:00): Removing the building=yes implies that this isn't a building but it clearly looks like one. Can you review?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128054251
Glassman (2022-10-26 22:25:11+00:00): highway crossing are added to highway=* features. This is a building. Can you review your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128054395
silversurfer83 (2022-10-26 15:26:30+00:00): And again. Double entry.
silversurfer83 (2022-10-26 15:29:04+00:00): Please respond to this message and explain why you keep doing this.
My next step would be reporting your account for vandalism.
marczoutendijk (2022-11-01 09:36:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6500
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Ropino (2023-05-31 20:02:52+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du bei vorhandenen Adressen den Wert addr:street ergänzt, obwohl bereits addr:place existierte? (z.B. in Wessen und Röcka)
In den kleinen Ortsschaften existiert kein entsprechender Straßenname +
addr:place UND addr:street zusammen macht halt keinen Sinn.
Es sollte immer nur eines von beiden genutzt werden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:*
VG Ropino
Dodko (2022-10-30 18:49:35+00:00): Pri poľnej ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106929825 je dobré doplniť aj tracktype 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
gscholz (2022-10-27 05:28:13+00:00): Hi alliegeglia1,
this changeset has created several errors int the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128055015

I have reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido
pbnoxious (2022-10-26 17:14:51+00:00): Hallo,

wie sicher bist du dir mit dem "Park & Ride"-Tagging auf dem Parkplatz östlich des Busbahnhofs?

Dort steht meiner Erinnerung nach kein solches Schild und die südliche Hälfte ist sogar mit "Nur für Kunden" für die beiden angrenzenden Lokale (Sägewerk & Sunrise) beschildert. Denke dass wird nicht Bahn-Infrastruktur sein?

Grüße
pbnoxious
rms_LDIE (2022-10-27 14:17:43+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe das überprüft und korrigiert. Du hattest recht. Das ist kein park_ride Parkplatz. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis.
Dodko (2022-10-30 18:52:52+00:00): Na poľnú cestu highway=track nie je nutné pridávať 
bicycle=yes
foot=yes
to už vyplýva z povahy cesty.
ToniE (2022-10-31 18:53:52+00:00): Servus Peter,

habe gerade die Buslinien angepasst, hoffe das passt so.

Gruß
Toni
Map-Peter (2022-11-01 20:29:11+00:00): Hallo Toni,
 
ja passt so. :-)
 
Vielen Dank
arichnad (2022-11-02 18:35:10+00:00): Hello Zarchary,

I noticed you removed the bicycle repair station with this edit.  I see it there today, and it has been there for at least the last month.

Thanks!
Zach Rowe (2022-11-02 19:07:25+00:00): yeah, I thought it was removed. need to add it back
Spush (2022-11-16 13:07:59+00:00): Egész háztömböket egy darab épületnek lerajzolni :D Mekkora trollkodás ez már. :D
KkLilla (2022-11-16 19:57:07+00:00): Bocsánat, én az alapján próbáltam rajzolni, ahogyan a többi épületeket is láttam. Mit rontottam el?
KkLilla (2022-11-16 20:03:29+00:00): Látom már, hogy a típusát nem jól írtam. Nem láttam a Sorház lehetőséget. Javítottam őket, így már jó?
Spush (2022-11-16 20:22:36+00:00): Nem jó. Mert egy épületnek rajzolod meg az egész utca összes épületét.
Így kéne valahogy:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129010084#map=19/46.90818/19.68020
MxxCon (2022-10-26 04:56:32+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of these street names?
Based on the steetview imagery, it seems like only the "lower" street has name of West 134th. Upper street has no street name signs..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128055973
osmkarl (2022-10-26 05:26:35+00:00): Although I didn't originally name the W 134th (upper) segment, that segment does have a sign. Confirmation can be viewed from Google Street View when positioned on Riverside Dr. just north of this intersection and look back toward the NE corner. Green "Riverside Dr" and "W 134th St" on green sign on pole on sidewalk.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128055973
MxxCon (2022-10-26 05:31:51+00:00): Please note that you CAN NOT use Google Maps or Google Streetview for any mapping in OSM. It is copyright violation! Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?
osmkarl (2022-10-26 05:58:05+00:00): No argument from me.  Like I said, I did not create that segment, nor did I name the "W 134th (upper)" segment. How would you like to proceed?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128055973
MxxCon (2022-10-26 06:01:26+00:00): I'm not saying you created the upper name, but you did create the "lower" one so I'm trying to clarify the info to ensure the correct info is recorded.
osmkarl (2022-10-26 06:17:35+00:00): As you've already attested, "Based on the steetview imagery, it seems like only the "lower" street has name of West 134th.".  Are you asking that I add "mapillary=499165854541223" to the lower segment?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128055973
MxxCon (2022-10-26 06:26:52+00:00): But that mapillary image doesn't show "lower" on the street sign either. I'm just trying to understand if that's an official street name or a name you came up with?
osmkarl (2022-10-26 06:43:02+00:00): So your objection is that I put "(lower)" in the street name?  You got me.  I've edited the name to remove the descriptor and added it into the alt_name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128055973
MxxCon (2022-10-26 06:47:52+00:00): You seem to have overly-defensive attitude towards of your edits.. 🤨I'm simply trying to make sure that accurate data is being recorded on the map by reviewing edits and making sure people don't make mistakes. There's no need for "you got me" sarcasm here..