piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Alex Popp (2022-11-15 16:17:08+00:00): Hello.
You have the wrong addressee. Please refer to "arcth".
Sincerely,
Alex Popp
Henosb (2021-06-28 22:34:08+00:00): Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta)
Proved_stroller (2021-06-30 08:00:15+00:00): The levels were gathered from memory and even though the buildings were traced from the aerial imagery, I have seen that they are still standing there today.

I am quite new to this, so please feel free to correct everything that seams wrong.
gscholz (2021-07-10 06:03:49+00:00): Hi laurahicar,
this changeset has detroyed the boundary relations of "Santa Ana" and "San Lucas":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-54.64168&lat=-25.53013&zoom=15

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107113066

Can you please fix this?

Your changelog comment "Ucap" seems also not to explain what you are doing here. Can you please educate your self about how to annotate properly? There is a wiki chapter which can help you:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Guido
Andrea Musuruane (2021-06-29 07:27:12+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. 

Per favore, non usare le immagini aeree di Bing perché non sono ben allineate nelle nostre zone. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. 

La modifica che hai fatto non è corretta. Il tag leisure=park è usato per definire uno spazio aperto ad uso ricreativo, solitamente progettato e allo stato seminaturale con aree erbose, alberi e cespugli, indipendentemente dalla sua dimensione. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark

Invece natural=wood viene di solito usato per indicare aree boschive senza gestione forestale.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood 

Ciao, Andrea
RicoElectrico (2021-06-29 13:01:41+00:00): Cześć, inni mapowicze mają zastrzeżenia do edycji z Waszej organizacji. Dodatkowo, prowadzicie płatne/zorganizowane edytowanie mapy bez powiadomienia społeczności. 

Hi, other mappers have remarks to edits coming from your organization. Moreover, you're conducting paid/organized mapping without notifying the local community.


https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=833799#p83379

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
TSymaps (2021-07-01 14:34:51+00:00): Sorry about this, we didn't know about this! If there a link so that we can consult the guidelines in detail? 

We will be more careful and abide by the rules

Cheers
RicoElectrico (2021-07-02 09:53:52+00:00): No problem :) 

Guidelines are described in the Wiki link I posted. But as it's written there - they're enforced as much as the local community wants. I think in the case of Polish community it'd be best to (for starters):

- create a topic on Polish forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 describing 1) where you got the data from 2) what is the licence, 3) scope of edits, 4) list all the accounts your company is using 5) propose how you're going to map the objects you want - which will be discussed by the Polish community to improve if needed.

Greetings
user_7130456 (2021-06-29 09:22:59+00:00): APM用单轨没问题，问题是这个不是APM，这个是PRT，宣传名叫智能小车。可以看 https://m.weibo.cn/status/4645110844756751 ，明显不是轨道交通
北巷猫眠 (2021-06-29 09:29:26+00:00): 早上的编辑记录中提到的APM是写错了，因为之前APM的类型也被选成了导轨巴士。
arichnad (2021-06-29 00:26:42+00:00): oof.  ignore my comment about cycleway=no not a thing.  sorry, I was wrong.
taki3hira (2021-06-29 00:53:49+00:00): 前肥田付近の建物の追加。道路・海岸線の調整。
by GISmaps/seamlessphoto
コメント途中でuplolad になってしまったので追記。
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-07-01 04:36:09+00:00): Good day. Please put this undiscussed import on hold and have a look at the guidelines that the OSM community has laid out for such endeavours. 

While it is much easier and faster to just copy data from google maps than to survey it yourself, this goes against many core principles of OSM. 

If you are willing to work together with the local community in cleaning up this import please send an email to talk-ph@openstreetmap.org. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines and contact the
manojkmohan (2021-07-11 17:57:51+00:00): ഇല്ലാത്ത റോഡൊക്കെ വരച്ചുവച്ചിരിക്കുന്നു :((
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107114909
MxxCon (2021-06-29 03:59:45+00:00): Hello.
Please note that when mapping flagpoles, as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dflagpole they must be mapped as a single node, not an area.
Additionally, it appears that you deleted and recreated identical features. Is there a reason for doing that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107115103
oruk09 (2024-12-26 03:15:21+00:00): 일부 지역태그가 아닌 건물로 된것이 있습니다
_caleb (2021-06-29 03:39:31+00:00): Hey I noticed that you're missing the sources info in your changesets. This has to do with essentially marking how you got the information contained within the changeset, and can be important for the future if people want to get an idea of how accurate some particular data is (for example, seeing something in person is almost always better than what you can get from aerial imagery).
Whenever you go to upload, click in the box under the changeset comments box called "Add fields:", and type in "Sources", hit enter. A new "sources" box will appear. This is where you can put your sources info. You can add multiple if they apply. 

Some common ones are: 
* survey - for if you've seen it with your own eyes within recent enough memory
* local knowledge - for things you may not have seen in recent time, but your experience in the area (whether from working there a lot, growing up there, living there, it's part of your commute, etc.) has contributed to your edits in some way that'd be better than just plain aerial imagery. 
* aerial imagery - self explanatory, but always good to add if you've used it
* street-level imagery - if you've used Mapillary, OpenStreetCam, or Bing Street Cam (all integrated in the OSM iD editor and licensed to be used)

There's some others you could use if applicable and you can read about them here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source#Specific_values
jonorossi (2021-07-01 09:16:31+00:00): You've created a concrete beach strangely shaped covering grass, roads, buildings and beach.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 03:11:40+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353681
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 03:11:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353681
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-30 03:17:24+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153353716
tomhukins (2021-08-04 19:13:17+00:00): In this changeset you have added the "access=private" tag to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222711697 yet this way already has "designation=public_footpath".  How can a public footpath be for private use only?
srikmar (2021-08-06 15:22:35+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. Apologies; I have misinterpreted the access tag based on the existing barrier. Please find the changeset for the suggested modifications 109269283. Thanks for the heads-up, Always happy to learn from the community. 
Regards,
srikmar
tomhukins (2021-08-08 17:51:03+00:00): It might also be worth restoring the "foot=yes" tag you removed to make it clear that pedestrians have a legal right to use this route.
InsertUser (2021-06-29 17:54:10+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 
This edit seems to have added a node tagged with just a height near Milwaukee. Did you mean to add this node?
nitram1234 (2021-07-06 08:31:39+00:00): Hi! Great job with the editing. In the future, could you be careful to not include two distant edits in the same changeset? That would greatly help on the history panel to see where the latest changes have been made. 

Thanks for your help, cheers!
Land-o Calrissian (2021-10-06 02:58:38+00:00): Hi diegoberesp,

This changeset has a large number of overlapping buildings.  Could you please correct this?  Thank you.
ovruni (2021-06-29 03:22:42+00:00): Hola Martha, gracias por contribuir a OSM. El uso de la etiqueta nombre se encuentra destinado solamente para entidades que tengan uno en particular y no para descripciones [0], en caso dese etiquetas una casa basta con agregar el valor house a la etiqueta building.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
jonorossi (2021-07-01 09:18:50+00:00): You've created a randomly shaped beach named Cribb Island with bad tagging next to Dunwich. Please stop defacing OSM.
radiotrefoil (2021-07-01 01:55:25+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits, just wondering why you removed the "natural=bare_rock" tag from Uluru?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107117096
aharvey (2021-06-29 03:40:23+00:00): Hi this feature already exists at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/765088610 so I've removed the duplicate one you just added.
aharvey (2021-06-29 03:38:47+00:00): Does this facility analyze the samples or just collect them. Usually these customer facing facilities are just for sample collection so better tagged as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:healthcare%3Dsample_collection
Daryl Radivojevic (2021-06-29 09:53:26+00:00): After looking closely at the website, it seems this site only does sample collection.
Anisa IRM-ED (2022-12-02 02:47:26+00:00): Hi, boyini01, Thank you for your mapping contribution!

I deleted floating highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/160828299) because it's not connected to other highways and the road is connected to the boundary. https://maproulette.org/challenge/30179/task/142913710
please let me know if there's any update on this area. Thank you and happy mapping!
user_13980615 (2021-10-06 14:06:06+00:00): 朋友，南阳站前广场拿区域框出来比较好吧，如果没问题的话过几天帮你改成区域？
Frans S (2021-07-20 14:15:22+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A remark. As the requirements ask for mapping highways like unclassified and higher, Paths and tracks are not required to map
On this task you mapped (or modified) paths. Please look for the width of a road. You can measure that easily by starting to draw a circular building and stay within the edged of the road. read the diameter on the bottom line of the task. If the road is smaller and appr. 2,5 mtr  it is to narrow for a road and should be seen as a path.
When the image is very good, you can see wheel tracks. You then can decide it is a highway suitable for vihicles with 4 wheels. Don't map tracks or very local short tracks.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2021-07-20 14:17:25+00:00): Hi.  please ad the tag surface=unpaved when it is obvious the road is not aspalted or similar.
Best regards
jcr83 (2021-07-05 08:55:13+00:00): Quelle est la source du nom "Suocle" que vous avez ajouté ? Les panneaux indiquent "Suolcle", et le cadastre "Socle".
Garabus (2021-07-05 09:45:47+00:00): J'ai toujours entendu dire "Suocle", jamais Socle et encore moins Suolcle qui est imprononçable, du moins pour les gens d'ici. Socle est sans doute la transcription francisée du gavot "suocle".

Voir aussi : 
https://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjnoab50cvxAhVi8OAKHRRHAHYQFjAAegQIBBAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vttour.fr%2Fsentiers%2Fgranges-du-colonel-croix-du-suocle%2C3347.html&usg=AOvVaw1L8j_XkM2eDVs2-S-sQrfX

et 

https://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjnoab50cvxAhVi8OAKHRRHAHYQFjABegQIAhAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vttour.fr%2Fm%2Fsentiers%2Fsentier.php%3Fid%3D3335&usg=AOvVaw1LsMoYAobg9oqx9e3XgStx

https://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjnoab50cvxAhVi8OAKHRRHAHYQFjAGegQICRAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Fpaca.lpo.fr%2Fblogs%2Flittoral-nicois-et-mentonnais%2F2016%2F11%2F29%2Fsortie-aux-terres-rouges-de-la-gordolasque-le-26-novembre-2016%2F&usg=AOvVaw1AHi8DJ_yFyqofDkCS0JWc

https://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwjR79e_0svxAhUOmhQKHTDvCXU4ChAWMAl6BAgMEAM&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ascvtt.com%2F2016%2F12%2F04%2Fmont-pel-ane%2F&usg=AOvVaw1N4PNZCPgOUFkOSzjuUQxH
jcr83 (2021-07-05 12:44:39+00:00): Il y a aussi beaucoup de références à "Suolcle" sur Internet, ce qui est normal, puisque c'est ce qu'indique l'IGN. L'inscription à la peinture sur la croix indique aussi Suolcle, mais c'est peut être une faute d'orthographe qui a été ensuite recopiée sur les cartes. Les cartes d'état major indiquent "Croix de Trémenil". Pas simple ...
Garabus (2021-07-05 16:55:16+00:00): Non, ce n'est pas simple. Ainsi, partout on écrit "Siruol" pour désigner les sommets qui surplombent Roquebillière, mais j'ai toujours entendu prononcer "Siriol"... 

Pour Suocle, il y a mes souvenirs, et je peux me tromper, mais il y a aussi le cadastre, avec Socle qui semble bien en être une transcription maladroite mais classique (comme Cros pour Cruos). Seul un berger ou un chasseur de Belvédère pourrait nous le confirmer.

Pour le Capelet Inférieur, l'orthographe "Cafalch" me semble finalement préférable car c'est celle qui est utilisée par le traité de délimitation de la frontière de 1861.
wireguy (2021-06-29 21:24:49+00:00): hi convissor. why are you removing marked crossings and tactile_paving on corners? The footway was adjusted to through a barrier, maybe the barrier needs adjusting too.
jonorossi (2021-07-01 09:37:12+00:00): You've created a beach at Deception Bay. You should familiarise yourself with the tagging guidelines for beaches, specifically the upper and lower limits which are mapped incorrectly.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=beach

Are you sure the beach is named "Deception Bay"? The suburb/town name shouldn't be added to the beach if it doesn't have a name.

OSM tagging uses lower_snake_case tag values, and so the surface=Sandy_with_vegetation tagging is now unique world wide. Usually the primary surface is used, in this case "sand", if you want to keep vegetation then you should use surface=sand;vegetation.
nevw (2021-07-02 05:43:44+00:00): ....also take into consideration that there is no sandy beach here. It is all mudflats and mangrove vegetation in parts.
nevw (2024-08-01 01:39:28+00:00): I have removed this beach.
aharvey (2021-06-30 11:12:27+00:00): I've removed the overlapping beach sections here and split them into a few with different names.
wa0kxo (2021-06-30 00:33:53+00:00): I found that when I last surveyed there was a portion of the road being torn away which I incorrectly assumed was not being replaced. I've reviewed https://i25powers.com/design and will restore the section of the offramp which leads directly to the round about. The rest of this changeset remains correct
aharvey (2021-06-30 11:07:40+00:00): hi it looks like you've added two overlapping beaches here so I've removed one so we have just the single beach. The south beach you've set the name as Mm could you please explain that?
aharvey (2021-06-30 10:59:50+00:00): It's good practice to try and modify existing objects rather than deleting and adding new ones to retain the history https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history. In iD you can right click the node and select disconnect.
pitscheplatsch (2021-06-29 06:47:11+00:00): Hi mohaqeq, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your data import? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Adam_Piszczek (2021-12-25 21:14:29+00:00): 959024646, wersja 1,nie ma tu żadnej drogi w budowie sama ziemia.
VA00 (2021-12-26 07:50:04+00:00): No tak, droga gruntowa na czas remontu PKP. Nie ma jej już?
Adam_Piszczek (2021-12-26 09:54:53+00:00): Nie ma.Usunąłem,dodałem uwage zamknięta droga z dwóch stron pod wiaduktem ,dlatego z rowerm musiałem się przedzierać w tym miejscu .
pitscheplatsch (2021-06-29 06:47:23+00:00): Hi mohaqeq, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your data import? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
mohaqeq (2021-06-29 07:00:06+00:00): Hello,
I work in MUDL Afghanistan.
we collected geospatial data of Afghanistan cities by using ODK collect and I import the public data via ArcGIS editor for OSM.
gscholz (2021-07-01 04:33:57+00:00): Hi Deltacentaury,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Rafael Uribe II":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-75.74142&lat=4.80027&zoom=18

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=107123370

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
carfog81 (2021-07-01 20:53:33+00:00): Hola, por favor no dañar las relaciones!
mariotomo (2021-12-24 21:20:31+00:00): grazie
aharvey (2021-06-30 10:53:52+00:00): 1. May I suggest https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility it sounds like it might be bad or intermediate.

2. Per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things the name should be the proper name only, the one you entered can be added as a description tag. Or better yet, encode that information in tags. eg trailblazed=cairns https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trailblazed#Values
ZenBiddist (2021-06-30 12:55:22+00:00): Thanks, I’ll add trail visibility when I’m at a desktop computer. As for the title denoting the fact that it’s a scramble rather than a path - this is a purely pragmatic safety choice. If no warning is given in the title visible on offline map apps, some runners and walkers might find themselves over their heads. Open to another method of warning that is visible on apps piggybacking OSM like maps.me, strava, MapOut, etc.
captain_slow (2021-11-03 18:46:52+00:00): Hallo TU_ZSG
Du hast in diesem Changeset drei Schiffshaltestellen (Bürkliplatz, Enge, Zürihorn), einige Stege inklusive der Fusswege darauf und einen Teil der Limmatschiffroute gelöscht. War das ein Versehen oder was war die Absicht dahinter?
Grüsse
TU_ZSG (2021-11-15 09:40:09+00:00): Hallo captain_slow
Enge wird nicht mehr durch Kursschiffe angefahren. Die Route von Bürkliplatz verläuft direkt nach Zürichhorn. Von da direkt nach Bellevue weiter nach Landesmuseum. Grüsse TU_ZSG
captain_slow (2021-11-15 09:53:41+00:00): Danke für die Info, dann werde ich heute Abend Teile der gelöschten Limmatschiffroute wiederherstellen und die sicher die beiden gelöschten Schiffshaltestellen Bürkliplatz und Zürichhorn wiederherstellen. Wurde die Schiffshaltestelle Enge abgebrochen? Falls diese noch vorhanden ist, werde ich diese auch wiederherstellen.
TU_ZSG (2021-11-15 10:36:00+00:00): Die Schiffstation Enge ist noch vorhanden, wird aber nicht mehr durch die Kursschiffe angefahren. Vielen Dank für die Wiederher- und Richtigstellung.
captain_slow (2021-11-15 16:54:45+00:00): Ich habe jetzt die oben erwähnten Objekte wiederhergestellt [1] und auch die Route des Limmatschiffs gemäss der Beschreibung angepasst [2], ich hoffe, jetzt stimmt es.
[1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113813452
[2]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113814022
TU_ZSG (2021-11-16 06:51:20+00:00): Stimmt alles. Vielen Dank
SekeRob (2021-06-29 08:55:53+00:00): Hi,

Funny, when I mapped my imported  cycle trace goes absolutely straight at the Via Volta/Nenni crossing. Always knew I could fly low ;O)))

Stay cool

PS Will add source:name tag and yield spot to Nenni>Volta.
If you have bus stops, could you please see which routes visit them. Tag route:ref=nn;nn etc. Long term I'll be mapping more bus route relations. Some of the present ones as documented by e.g. Moovit do not match reality. A classic case presently at Falcone & Borsellini. seen the buses stop there of line 14 but the spot is way outside the bus routing, so much so that Osmose gives an alert. Need to update, whence finding a reliable source (visit the TUA office ;)

cheers
FinixFighter (2021-06-29 12:27:30+00:00): You're right! I know that one of the three bus stop I added is visited by 14 and 15 (I also remember the sign). But I'm not sure about the other two. I should check on site whenever I'll get there. Anyway mapping bus routes is a very great project! I hope TUA will make GTFS files public one day! 
Have a nice day!
Leo Slager (2021-06-29 09:25:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
riysingh (2021-06-29 06:52:01+00:00): Hi,
I have made the edits in this changeset : 107126745 based on #MapWithAI.

Regards,
riysingh.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-26 07:22:11+00:00): Hello! Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5418332 ?
Leo Slager (2021-06-29 09:39:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2021-06-29 09:29:57+00:00): Hi MrGysta,
Je hebt hier de adresgegevens toegevoegd aan het terrein.
het adres hoort echter bij het gebouw en de adresgegevens worden in NL rechtstreeks geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster.
Ik zal het even aanpassen.
Leo Slager (2021-06-29 09:35:49+00:00): Verder zat er nog een foutje in de openingstijden.
So met zijn Su.
We gebruiken nu enmaal het Engels als standaard.
MrGysta (2021-06-29 09:58:37+00:00): tuurlijk, dom. zoal het onthouden.
Planvoll (2021-06-30 07:58:53+00:00): Please revert my change! These traffic signals have no tactile indication!!

How could I revert those changes by myself in future??
PT-53 (2021-06-30 08:38:22+00:00): Siehe Anfrage im OSM-Forum
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73164
Grüße
Nakaner (2021-06-30 08:38:42+00:00): Hallo,

es gibt mehrere Möglichkeiten, die Änderung rückgängig zu machen:

1. Im Online-Editor iD auf openstreetmap.org bearbeiten

2. Mit JOSM (Desktop-Anwendung) bearbeiten

3. Mit JOSM und dem Reverter-Plugin den Änderungssatz rückgängig machen

4. Mit Vespucci (Android-App) bearbeiten

Willst du es selber machen oder soll ich es tun?

Viele Grüße

Michael
eginhard (2021-06-30 08:52:45+00:00): Das geht sonst auch direkt in der StreetComplete App über den "Rückgängig machen"-Pfeil unten links, allerdings nur für Änderungen der letzten 12 Stunden.
Planvoll (2021-06-30 08:56:23+00:00): Gerade diese Möglichkeit

1. Im Online-Editor iD auf openstreetmap.org bearbeiten  

sehe ich nicht. Vielleicht habe ich Tomaten auf den Augen.
Planvoll (2021-06-30 08:58:31+00:00): Aber ich werde die anderen Angebote ausprobieren. 

Vielen Dank für Eure Antworten.
PT-53 (2021-07-01 07:03:12+00:00): >>>  1. Im Online-Editor iD auf openstreetmap.org bearbeiten   <<<
Wenn Du die Seite
https://www.openstreetmap.org
aufrufst in der Menüzeile oben auf Bearbeiten klicken, dann hast Du die Auswahl zwischen ID und anderen Editoren.
RicoElectrico (2021-06-29 13:00:16+00:00): Cześć, inni mapowicze mają zastrzeżenia do edycji z Waszej organizacji. Dodatkowo, prowadzicie płatne/zorganizowane edytowanie mapy bez powiadomienia społeczności. 

Hi, other mappers have remarks to edits coming from your organization. Moreover, you're conducting paid/organized mapping without notifying the local community.


https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=833799#p83379

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
Vinber-Pro (2022-05-17 09:08:15+00:00): Salut,
en se posant des questions sur comment taguer des MAM (Maison d'Assistantes Maternelles) je suis tombé sur ce tag que tu as créé il y a 11 mois. Il semble intéressant, nous llons nous en servir dans la manche :)

J'ai commencé à le poser sur le wiki, pour le documenter un peu. Si cela t'intéresse, c'est sur la page de discussion de https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:kindergarten:FR

Au plaisir
StefanHRT (2021-06-29 07:32:30+00:00): Hallo. sicher dass das eine residential ist? Die zuführenden Straßen sind living street soweit ich mich erinnere ;) VG
crissiloop (2021-06-29 07:43:07+00:00): Der Dörferweg ist kein verkehrsberuhigter Bereich, da mit Tempo 30 beschildert. Beim David-Friedländer-Weg ist einfach die Beschilderung uneindeutig. Wenn man von der Henriette-Herz-Allee kommt gibt es kein Zeichen für einen verkehrsberuhigten Bereich, wenn man aber von der Johann-Jacob-Engel-Straße kommt, wäre es ein verkehrsberuhigter Bereich da am Beginn der Jacob-Engel-Straße das Schild steht