piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2021-12-11 12:10:23+00:00): Hello,
I'm struggling to see any sign of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961703557 in available imagery (Bing, Maxar, Esri).  Bing's pretty clear, and there's nothing there.
Please check this, and all other tracks added in this changeset.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-12-11 12:11:15+00:00): Sorry - "this changeset" means https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107458287 not 114412123, since that was where this track was added.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-11 12:17:19+00:00): Hello,
What is your source for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/961703850 west of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8933482165 ?  I can't see anything on the available imagery.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-12-11 13:13:42+00:00): Hello
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962302175/history
Seems pretty unlikely - it is a track that "flows into a stream" https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962302171/history .
Best Regards,
Andy
VARVAR8 (2021-12-11 16:52:14+00:00): So. According to my data, the stream https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962302175/ really exists. Everything else - Corrected
SomeoneElse (2021-12-16 12:29:39+00:00): Now you've changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962302175/history from a track to a stream it makes much more sense.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-16 12:31:13+00:00): Looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/968249780 , it doesn't appear to go through https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8957929769 at all but around to the east.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-27 11:28:49+00:00): Does https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967666499/history really exist?  It has been suggested to us that it doesn't.  It doesn't connect to anything.  What was the source?
SomeoneElse (2021-12-27 11:30:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965042783/history is another one that does not connect to anything and has been reported to us as probably not existing.  What was the source?
VARVAR8 (2022-01-07 00:45:40+00:00): Hi, Andy. So. It was my mistake. Some tracks missed. Tried to fix them. Later I will go again to fix the "islands". I fixed the above mentioned paths 967666499; 965042783 (and some others) in the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115858206
jtracey (2021-12-01 20:03:11+00:00): Thanks for the edits! So a couple notes for the future:
 - It's preferred if you add a source tag to your edits (in the default editor, iD, that's "Add field"->"sources" when you're saving). It's not big deal if you forget, but it helps things like figuring out how precise the newly mapped features are, and ensuring there's no copyright issues.
 - It's a good idea to try to keep the area your editing on the smaller side (roughly the size of a city or smaller, though larger edits are sometimes justified, especially in rural areas). This makes it easier to check out what you changed, and also makes it so the bounding box doesn't span large areas that weren't touched in the History tab. Similar to forgetting sources though, it's not a huge deal if it happens.
VARVAR8 (2021-11-30 22:30:28+00:00): Дякую. Випередив мене!
SomeoneElse (2021-11-30 19:09:23+00:00): Looking on the available imagery, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006191185 does not look like a track at all.  Likewise, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6093419 does not look at all like allotments.
VARVAR8 (2021-11-30 21:26:44+00:00): 1. Do you need me to delete them? 
2. The author of r6093419 was not me!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114413141
VARVAR8 (2021-11-30 21:46:28+00:00): ...although in my opinion there are is allotments (r6093419).
SekeRob (2022-09-10 18:02:02+00:00): Hi,

when mapping bicycle routes, particularly on footways, but any other way too, is that you have to make sure the way is from tag point of view allowed for bicycles. In case of footways, add bicycle=yes+ segregated=yes/no as per the situation. Fixed a dozen and surely there are many more.

caio
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-30 19:43:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 109493230, 114355934, 114356224, 114356681, 114356755, 114387398, 114387425.
Carto'Cité (2022-01-17 16:20:00+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour cette mise à jour. 
Aurais-tu suffisamment d'informations pour cartographier les voies de service du parking restant ? C'est important pour les itinéraires piétons depuis la gare vers le parking - notamment les places PMRs. Je suis preneur de photos par exemple.
Merci,
Antoine de Carto'Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
lunaticstraydog (2022-01-17 18:45:53+00:00): De mémoire je ne sais plus, j'essayerai d'y penser quand je passerai par la (probablement pas tout de suite, mais bon)
lunaticstraydog (2022-03-16 19:34:11+00:00): Bonjour,
comme promis et avec (un peu) de retard, des photos prises en passant :
(j'ai essayé de faire un umap pour les localiser, mais j'ai pas réussi --')
https://ibb.co/MNZnF7p
https://ibb.co/CJTnz8M
https://ibb.co/wpGjR7Y
https://ibb.co/6mbMRwJ
https://ibb.co/hRzcy9f
https://ibb.co/DrY7bPQ
https://ibb.co/PDFL8KR
Je cartographierai ça ce week end si j'ai le temps, d'ici la sentez vous libre de vous y essayer :)
lunaticstraydog (2022-03-18 18:29:10+00:00): Changements faits dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118643654#map=18/48.43804/2.15967&layers=N
Loin d'être parfait mais c'est un début
apm-wa (2022-06-15 09:33:50+00:00): This terminal is NOT for use by diplomats or Turkmen officials other than the president and members of his family. It should not be labeled as you labeled it.
ElliottPlack (2021-12-01 03:17:54+00:00): Looks like a home office sort of location. I would typically use the same criteria for these sorts of businesses as Google Maps, i.e. if it is not publicly accessible location, it should not be mapped as a POI. It if fine to list the mailing address on a website that the business controls but not to list the office location unless there is some sort of show room. This node has the same address and yet a different location, probably the same sort of SEO stuff: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6829598587/history
user_5359 (2021-12-01 04:27:36+00:00): Thanks for pointing out the address three houses down. Since it is unclear where exactly the address mentioned (and the status of the stores) is, I would delete both nodes as spam. Agreed?
John Kastner (2021-12-02 14:01:32+00:00): Another change-set with the same pattern: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114480515
ElliottPlack (2021-12-02 14:10:50+00:00): Agreed, I’d delete all as spam. According to public records, the 718 address is the one where Affordable Roofing is. However based on the aerial there is no parking there. I think it’s just a home office.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-13 13:48:29+00:00): Ciao. Le due delibere, quella del comune di Trivero prima e quello di Valdilana dopo, cambiano solo il nome delle aree di circolazione (=le strade), non i nomi delle frazioni. Ciao, Andrea
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-12-16 13:00:37+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكن عشوائية وغير صحيحة
mueschel (2021-12-01 18:04:31+00:00): Hi,
the tag "name:route" is not used in other places yet. It's also not necessary - routes can be mapped using route relations:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route
mappeur-itinerant (2021-12-02 04:51:20+00:00): Hi,
Indeed "name:route" is not a common tag, I used it because:
- Some mappers want to add the name of the route/itinerary, but they use the "name" tag and overwrite the "name" of the local street/road.
The "name" of the local street/road is more valuable than the name of the route/itinerary in my opinion.
- I want to preserve the local name and show to other mappers that the route name is something else and should not overwrite the local one. So "name:route" acts then as a precise "note" to others mappers.

I am aware of the route relations, but "name:route" is a 1-tag quicker fix during some sessions when I do not have the time to create a full route relation.

In any case, even after the creation of route relations, I feel that the note of "name:route" as a mapping warning would still be useful for other mappers in our area.
Otherwise, people overlooking relations might want again to change "name" of all segments with a "ref" to the "name:route".
SomeoneElse (2021-12-11 12:56:04+00:00): Are you sure that the middle part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965674960 , around https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8933483933/history , actually exists?  It doesn't look like it on the imagery.
Best Regards,
Andy
VARVAR8 (2021-12-11 21:52:33+00:00): corrected
mapko (2022-05-19 18:55:23+00:00): Dobry den. Na zaklade akeho zdroja ste tieto cesty zmenili na primary 68? Ako viem, su to linky k motorway D1.
mapko (2024-07-31 22:57:23+00:00): Dobry den. Do dnesneho dna ste neodpovedali a ani nedoslo na zmenu ze by toto bola I/68. Prosim vratte zmeny spat, lebo toto zodpoveda legalnemu stavu. Dakujem.
Liqid1010 (2024-07-31 23:08:12+00:00): Neviem, nemal som zdroj ale logika predsa káže ze neoznacim dvojprudovku jednosmernú ako highway link a tiez ze su to očividne dve rôzne križovatky. Tiež by potom táto križovatka bola nerozumne dvojfarebná. Jednoducho logickejsie a citatelnejsie by to bolo takto ako to je. Tiez nehovorte mi ze to nie je cesta I/68. Cesty bezne idu az po križovatku s diaľnicou, ktorá je "červená" ako highway link.
mapko (2024-08-02 20:51:55+00:00): Logika??? 👏
Prosim vychadzajte vzdy len z oficialnych informacii. Tu je cestna "biblia" https://www.cdb.sk/files/documents/cestna-databanka/vystupy-cdb/2024/kniha_miestopis_2024-01-01.pdf
Miestopis jasne hovori, ze cesta I/68  krizovanim III/3445 x I/68 x D1.
Je to len jedna krizovatka a (ne)rozumne je trojfarebna, presne ako som to kedysi zaznacil.
Prosim o zrovnanie sa miestopisom (stav aky tam bol pred vasimi upravami).
PS: Ak by ste mali historicku stopu, tak ta by ste vedeli ze Petrovianska bola III/068010, rovnako ako je cesta do Petrovian. Potom bola zmenena na dialnicny privadzac PD16, potom privadzac I/80 a nakoniec jednotka I/68.
Liqid1010 (2024-08-02 21:14:08+00:00): V poriadku, ja som za korektnosť a presnosť a budem Vám veriť keďže sa asi vyznáte ako to má byť. Len zase OpenStreetMap nie sú len oficiálne zdroje ale skôr to co je v teréne (kde sú oficiálne označenia zväčša len arbitrarne subjektívne ľudské výmysly). A tam si myslím ze je to očividné a citatelnejsie pre každého tak ako som tak spravil ja. Jednoducho tak ako to je podla Vás správne mi to bude veľmi neprijemne biť do očí a pozerať sa na to budem s. ťažkým srdcom, avšak ak sú na ceste v daných miestach označenia s číslom cesty (kilometrovniky) a cesta 68 naozaj začína až neskôr tak v tom prípade nech bude po Vašom. Dajte ešte vedieť s tymi kilomtrovnikmi prosím. Ďakujem.
Liqid1010 (2024-08-02 21:19:40+00:00): Nakoniec som sa pozrel na daný odkaz a neviem no. Ako to interpretovať že "koniec cesty 68 je na križovatke 68,3445,D1"?? Co je potom v danej križovatke? Hovoríte že D1? Prečo nie logicky 68? Podľa mojich skúseností by sa mala najväčšia cesta predĺžiť čo najviac (D1 ale nie keďže ta ocividne pokračuje iným smerom a nekončí tu), Ted 68 by mala ist až po križovatku s D1 kde sa vetvi (ved tam aj reálne plynule cesta pokračuje a nekončí nejako divne hneď pri odbočke na 3445).
mapko (2024-08-02 21:37:54+00:00): Ano, OSM zaznamenava aj realnu situaciu v terene. Verim ze budete verit tomuto kilometrovniku https://www.google.com/maps/@48.9520993,21.256766,3a,16.2y,60.68h,85.21t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sfoYraYckPhbiWIwa8Os7VA!2e0!6shttps:%2F%2Fstreetviewpixels-pa.googleapis.com%2Fv1%2Fthumbnail%3Fpanoid%3DfoYraYckPhbiWIwa8Os7VA%26cb_client%3Dmaps_sv.share%26w%3D900%26h%3D600%26yaw%3D60.68392731551969%26pitch%3D4.788040645925776%26thumbfov%3D90!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205410&entry=ttu (krizovatkova vetva V2 zacina odbocenim z D1 od Kosic a konci za mostom, kde sa pripaja cesta od Petrovian)
Vetvy dialnicnej krizovatky sa oznacuju podla znacenia dialnice, v tomto pripade D1... to D1 co je na kilometrovniku.
Prosim nie podla skusenosti, ale podla reality.
Liqid1010 (2024-08-03 09:19:12+00:00): V tom prípade sa ospravedlňujem a ďakujem za opravu.
user_14547832 (2022-06-27 13:33:29+00:00): This is my first changeset
GEOIG (2021-11-30 19:25:30+00:00): Added POI according to official site https://www.lexus.fr/retailers/lexus-frejus/
user_5359 (2021-12-01 17:17:16+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9297460642? Did you know the tag not:wikidata?
mappeur-itinerant (2021-12-02 05:09:08+00:00): Yes and no!
I sometimes forget or confuse "not:wikidata" with "note:wikidata" :-/
I made the change https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114466963
mappeur-itinerant (2021-12-02 05:14:18+00:00): (but quite honestly I prefer how "wikidata" and "wikidata:error" are ordered together alphabetically, whereas "wikidata" and "not:wikidata" are far away)
Dimitar155 (2021-12-12 20:37:24+00:00): Hello fazerr,

Why have you moved the bus line to the trolleybuses' relation and tagged it as a trolleybus line?

Regards,
Dimitar
fazerr (2021-12-25 13:32:18+00:00): Hello Dimitar!
I did not find any OSM-related info regarding electrobuses; however on the sofiatraffic.bg site they are mentioned in "Trolleys" section. Also I was sure that E84 and E184 lines are included to Trolleys network, but for now it's not true (E84 is in Buses network and E184 is not mentioned at all).
Do you know whether electrobuses should be included to Trolleys network or to Buses one?
Dimitar155 (2021-12-25 13:52:31+00:00): It's quite messed up system to be fair. All "trolleybus" lines that have "E" in their name are operated by "Metropolitan Electric Transport". There are also other lines that use electric buses (9 and 309) but they are operated by "Metropolitan Autotransport" (which also operates most bus lines in the city). sofiatraffic.bg is trying to distinguish these things in a strange way. In my opinion electrobus lines are bus lines since they don't use catenary wires and they don't have trolley poles.
fazerr (2021-12-26 12:07:23+00:00): "In my opinion electrobus lines are bus lines since they don't use catenary wires and they don't have trolley poles" - sounds reasonable indeed. I'll set E6 line back to the Buses network. Thank you, Dimitar =)
eggie (2021-12-01 08:46:53+00:00): Dag der3b  Je vraagt feedback.

Wanneer dat echt een trap is 'in de zin van'...  is het uiteraard goed getagd. 

MVG
eggie
A67-A67 (2021-11-30 20:30:12+00:00): I've corrected the start of the living street (woonerf) in the Stieltjesweg to the location that was mapped before. It starts at the intersection with the road through Applied Physics, not at the Schoemakerstraat.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-30 20:02:49+00:00): You've removed tracktype here, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/999523559 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/971767658 don't appear to exist at all (other than "someone could drive round a field here").
VARVAR8 (2021-11-30 21:18:02+00:00): Do you need me to delete them?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114416464
SomeoneElse (2021-11-30 21:20:48+00:00): I'm just concerned that you're spending a lot of time editing things that I'm probably going to have to delete shortly - I don't want you to waste your time.
VARVAR8 (2021-12-01 08:21:45+00:00): 28.Now.2021 I paused working with MapWithAI. Maybe for a long time. I will ask you as an administrator, and why did you see my mistakes after 8 months of my work?
VARVAR8 (2021-12-01 08:25:38+00:00): ...and dоn't see such imports directly in the neighborhood of other OSM members.
Frans S (2021-12-02 09:28:39+00:00): Hello. I reviewed all 3 changesets on this project issued by you and, sorry to say, none of them is accurate mapped. Please improve your mapping quality. 
 You also connected buildings to each other.
See my comment on changeset 114416714
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114416486
ravali_78 (2021-12-01 06:15:03+00:00): Hi tzx59h
I have fixed the alignment as building polygons overlapping with highways.Kindly check with w725065326,w911118456,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114429121.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114416631
SherbetS (2022-04-11 12:02:36+00:00): hello Chris Lawrence,

on this object, you tagged it as man_made=communications_tower 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9297545116
the correct tag is man_made=mast+tower:type=communication even though the JOSM preset is confusing.
Frans S (2021-12-02 09:30:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
Buildings should be tagged as building=yes, which is the standard for HOTOSM projects.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114416665
ravali_78 (2021-12-01 06:09:08+00:00): HI mperry21,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygons overlapping with highways.Kindly check with w724875944,w727696678,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114428885.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114416700
Frans S (2021-12-02 09:23:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114416714
Frans S (2021-12-02 09:22:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Difficult imagery to map from.
 Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114416741
ravali_78 (2021-12-01 06:00:11+00:00): Hi Jceccacci,
I have fixed the alignment as building polygons overlapping with highways.Kindly check with w702591721,w702591722,w702591724,https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114428498.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114416778
Frans S (2021-12-02 09:21:16+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.  Difficult imagery to map from,
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114416986
Frans S (2021-12-02 09:33:41+00:00): Hello. In addition to my previous comment I am sorry to say, but all your changsets have the same issues. Please be sure to map more accurate and tag correctly.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114417041
SomeoneElse (2021-12-11 10:50:42+00:00): Hello,
Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981394969/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981394966 actually exist?  It doesn't look like they do from the imagery.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-12-11 11:34:56+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962737350 actually exists east of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8905571075 ?  It really doesn't look like it from the imagery, even allowing for imagery offset in hilly areas.  There is a cliff!
Best Regards,
Andy
d1sr4n (2022-05-14 15:41:39+00:00): Привет. Исправьте ваши пресеты, большинство торговых точек пятерочки это не supermarket а convenience store.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-11-30 20:52:04+00:00): Hi!

Question - you're changing a lot of simple closed way areas into relations composed of several distinct ways. Is there a reason you're doing this?

I ask because by taking Vales Point Park as an example, that area is now composed of 6 distinct ways as opposed to just being 1 - which will make things a bit tricky for future editors and which also makes it much more likely someone is going to break something in the future without realising.