piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jmania (2020-02-12 10:43:50+00:00): Why are you edit such an improper roads?? That roads that you make edit are not exist there.. I will report you as an spam user. Please stop making such an unexisting edits
SomeoneElse (2020-07-18 19:18:53+00:00): There seem to be lots of duplication of names here, of which "Cove Pasture" is one example (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771291571 is one of at least 3).  
Are all of the places called "Cove Pasture" in OSM really named that, or is the one larger feature which should be mapped, or perhaps it's just a historical name and doesn't belong in OSM at all?
ma-rt-in (2020-02-10 16:11:44+00:00): Hallo,
ist die Brücke nur gesperrt oder wird dran gearbeitet?
vg
ThG_ (2020-02-10 18:41:52+00:00): Diese Brücke ist schon seit Jahren vollständig für den öffentlichen Straßenverkehr, einschl. Fussgänger + Fahrradfahrer, gesperrt. Südlich ist eine kleines Stück der Brücke bis zu ersten Abfahrt für den Bahn-Betriebsinternen Verkehr noch offen. Vor meiner Änderung heute (Strassensperre entsprechend Deiner Änderung an der A1-Brücke in Hittfeld) haben  die OSM-Router die Brücke zTeil noch vorgeschlagen. Nach meiner Änderung heute wurden die Routen innerhalb kurzer Zeit korrigiert. Alsi nicht erst nach Tagen...

Siehe auch Fehlerbericht:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1363969#map=16/53.4001/10.0643&layers=N
ma-rt-in (2020-02-10 18:48:18+00:00): Wenn an der Brücke nix gebaut/repariert wird, dann auch nicht das highway=construction verwenden! Dann nur das access=no verwenden.
ThG_ (2020-02-10 18:50:32+00:00): Die Brücke ist für den Abriss vorgesehen und kann unter keinen Umständen noch genutzt werden wie es in den OSM-Routen noch heutemorgen vorgeschlagen wurde.
ma-rt-in (2020-02-10 18:51:40+00:00): Solange keine Abrisstätigkeiten zusehen sind, ist die Verwendung von hw=construction nicht zu empfehlen. Also bitte wieder rausnehmen.
literan (2020-02-10 17:10:25+00:00): только непонятно, зачем тег кафе (amenity=cafe)  удалили. Он основной. Вернул.
dvdhoven (2020-02-10 12:03:22+00:00): Eggie,

Ik heb deze changeset reverted. Sorry, maar ik kreeg de changeset van die nieuwe mapper niet reverted.
Er was meer mis en na jouw reparatie was 11-18 nog niet goed en de wandelroute H68-H69 zat ook in de problemen.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
eggie (2020-02-10 12:08:31+00:00): Klopt.. want ik was nog bezig. Had alleen ondertussen wat opgeslagen. In de BGT omtrekgericht is die Walboersweg inderdaad onderbroken. Kijk jij verder.. ?dan blijf ik er even af. 

Gr eggie
dvdhoven (2020-02-10 12:46:42+00:00): Eggie,

Alles is hersteld en aangepast 

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
eggie (2020-02-10 12:49:24+00:00): Zag het... Thanks
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-02-10 12:04:34+00:00): Ha Dick. Ik was aan het herstellen gegaan, maar kon uiteraard niet uploaden. Kijk jij verder?
Dacht.. leg die route over dat voetpad. 
Van de startende mapper geen antwoord ontvangen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80791774
MVG,
Eggie
flohoff (2020-02-13 15:53:02+00:00): Moin,
wenn du nen Pub einträgst dann reicht im Name der Eigenname - name ist nicht beschreibend gemeint.

D.h. das das ein pub ist steht im "amenity=pub".
Im name legst du dann nur noch "Zum Dorfkrug" ab.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/80794730
viloan (2020-02-10 12:19:12+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
WoSoe (2020-02-10 18:41:23+00:00): Warum wurde der von mir eingezeichnete way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/769449274 gelöscht?
Nur weil er auf dem Satellitenbild nicht erkennbar ist, heißt das nicht, dass es diesen in Wirklichkeit nicht gibt. ;-)
gsperb (2020-02-11 08:34:14+00:00): Hi
Sorry, ich konnte mir nicht vorstellen, dass es ihn gibt. Ebensowenig wie ich den Zufahrtsweg als "residential" betrachte.
Vielleicht lag es auch daran, dass eine Pferderennbahn nicht flächig wie ein Fussballfeld sein kann und ich ihn im Zuge der Überarbeitung "erwischt" habe.
gerd
viloan (2020-02-10 12:38:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
isidor (2020-02-16 12:55:25+00:00): Hi,
I have checked wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway
"The railway tag is used to tag the ways for many kinds of railways including including light rail, mainline railways, metros, monorails AND TRAMS."

or wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dtram

or wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Ddisused
How to map
the track of the railway:
railway=disused + disused:railway=rail/light_rail/subway/TRAM

So what exactly are you talking about?
*Martin* (2020-02-18 07:46:30+00:00): Isidor is right. Please revert.
TomiXL (2020-02-18 08:37:01+00:00): In third link posted by isidor from wiki:
"There is some use of disused=tram and disused=railway to mark railway type without using lifestyle prefixes."

Will use disused=tram
isidor (2020-02-18 11:31:59+00:00): Please read wiki carefully:

RAILWAY=DISUSED + disused=rail/light_rail/tram

i.e. BOTH tags, not only disused=*
isidor (2020-02-18 11:32:45+00:00): You might as well specify what kind of "problems in location based mobile apss" this is causing and in which apps.
aceman444 (2020-02-22 09:19:44+00:00): So now you have made a full operational tram out of it (using railway=tram). What was the point? It seems there are also other people's idea about that railway (in the history of the OSM ways), e.g. using railway=preserved (but if nothing operates on the tracks, this is not the right tag).
TomiXL (2020-02-22 17:01:36+00:00): At least its now showed on map as a tram. With tags suggested by isidor, it was showed on map as a railway witch is completely wrong. So now its taged as railway=tram, disused=tram and its showed corectly as tram.
isidor (2020-02-22 19:25:15+00:00): First rule of OpenStreeMap - do NOT tag for the renderer... there are hundreds and thousands of maps out there based on OSM data, so if one of them cannot correctly parse the railway=disused tag, it is really no reason to put incorrect data into the database. Sorry. 
More here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
aceman444 (2020-02-22 19:32:52+00:00): TomiXL: if there does not operate any tram on those tracks, why should it show up as tram? It is a generic disused railway (tracks). Thus railway=disused seems correct. The additional information 'disused=tram' only says that in the past some tram operated there (and not a real train). You yourself said no tram can operate there now as it is a pedestrian zone. Thus the tracks are just a visual detail of the pavement on the spot, but not map should show them as fully functional tram tracks/railway.
TomiXL (2020-02-23 05:44:00+00:00): Not one of them but OSM them selves (and all others then) showed it incorettly as railway.
*Martin* (2020-02-23 08:07:33+00:00): It is not "OSM themselves". It is just Mapnik Carto style on OSM. Then also host other map layers.

BTW the same map doesn't show red hiking trails. What about to tag them with highway=trunk? That map shows it nicely in red.

Sorry, thet was just an example to show that your assumptions are just wrong. Please read again that linked wiki article posted by Isidor.

Thanks.
*Martin* (2020-02-23 08:14:29+00:00): BTW if you don't like rendering on Carto map then you should report it to https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues and not to tag for Carto renderrer.
messpert (2020-02-16 20:09:29+00:00): But this turn restriction isn't there as far as I can see. I drive along this road regularly, usually with a geotagged dashcam  running. I have just carefully checked the video taken last week, and there is no restriction turning right into Tredinnick Lane when travelling East on the A38.

I have also checked dashcam video taken in January travelling West, and again there are no turn restrictions on the A38.

I haven't surveyed along Tredinnick Lane: I suppose that there could be a "No right turn" sign when joining the A38, although the dashcam video shows the sign at the end of the lane, and there is no restriction there, so I think that too is not the case.

So I don't know what this "driver's feedback" is, but it seems to be objectively wrong.
messpert (2020-02-16 20:18:16+00:00): There *is* a missing turn restriction for Tideford Road which I will add soon. Maybe the "driver" confused the turnings?
di5order (2020-02-17 13:50:56+00:00): Hello, thanks for react on this edit.

When I made this restriction, I based it on the prohibition to crossing double solid line on this intersection (point 129 from this link: https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/lines-and-lane-markings-on-the-road.html). I proposed that driver was confused by this too.

If this action is allowed and driver can turn there, please tell me and i'll fix back.
messpert (2020-02-17 15:59:33+00:00): No, the highway code permits crossing double solid lines to turn into a side road: you seem to have overlooked this part of the sentence:
"unless it is safe and you need to enter adjoining premises or a side road."

I hope you haven't applied this to other places in the UK: it would make routing almost impossible over much of the country!

There is also a sign post at the junction which again would be a bit silly if one could not turn there.
di5order (2020-02-18 13:43:57+00:00): No, this one is the only edit.
In this case only u-turn is restricted. Is it right?
messpert (2020-02-18 14:32:32+00:00): Well, I guess that a u-turn is probably covered on a strict interpretation. But double solid lines in the UK are primarily aimed at stopping dangerous overtaking. Well, white ones, anyway.

This is just a normal turning with no particular restrictions.
di5order (2020-02-18 14:53:13+00:00): Many thanks for info
eggie (2020-02-10 14:52:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
abakus_uploader (2020-02-10 23:30:49+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Hubert87 (2020-07-07 18:35:09+00:00): Hi,
könntest Du das noch ein bischen genauer erklären.
1. Fahren durch die Obernstraße fahren keine Busse, nur die Straßenbahn.
2. Wird das doch schon durch den Access-Tag "bus:conditional" genau so beschrieben. Dazu braucht es kein anderen HW-Typ, insbesondere weil dieser Bereich ja Fußgängerzone ist.
FabiStrassenbahn (2020-07-07 19:27:41+00:00): Moin!
1. Die Obernstraße wird gelegentlich auch von Bussen genutzt, z.B. als Umleitungsweg der Linie 25. Kommt immer mal wieder vor.

2. Die Domsheide und die Obernstraße waren als Fußgängerwege/-zone definiert. Folgesysteme, die die OSM-Karte und deren Tags nutzen, schließen allerdings Busverkehr und Fußgängerzonen gegeneinander aus. So wurde im gemeinten System die Buslinie 25 quer durch die Stadt geschickt, da sie laut der Definition der Wege nicht zur Domsheide fahren konnte/durfte.
Hubert87 (2020-07-07 22:20:52+00:00): Ok, 
zu 2tens. Aber ist das ein "Fehler" in den Daten oder nur ein Problem bei den Auswertern.
Ich kann hw=pedestrian + bus:conditional=* ersteinmal nichts falsches erkennen; hw=service hingegen liegt dort definitiv nicht vor.
highflyer74 (2020-07-08 06:00:58+00:00): @FabiStrassenbahn: ich muss Hubert87 zustimmen, da wir in OSM alles nur so erfassen, wie es auch in Wirklichkeit ist und nicht, um bestimmte Dinge zu erreichen (Stichwort Mapping für den Renderer / Router). In diesem Fall muss die Routing-Software angepasst werden und bus:conditional=* auswerten. Dann gibt es auch keine Probleme in der Hinsicht. Viele Grüße!
Nakaner (2020-07-08 07:41:22+00:00): Hallo,

ich sehe das auch so. Eine Routingsoftware für öffentliche Linienbusse darf nicht die highway-Werte blind in "erlaubt" und "verboten" einteilen. Es gibt unzählige Städte, in denen Busse durch Fußgängerzonen fahren. Diese nur deshalb nicht als Fußgängerzone (highway=pedestrian) zu taggen, nur weil die Routingsoftware des örtlichen Verkehrsbetriebs das nicht kann, ist Tagging für den Router und genauso verwerflich wie Tagging für den Renderer. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer

Viele Grüße

Michael
FabiStrassenbahn (2020-07-08 12:08:04+00:00): Danke für die konstruktiven Hinweise.
Dann würde ich sagen, stellen wir den "Fußgängerzonen-Zustand" wieder her.
Reicht es hier, wieder highway = pedestrian einzugeben? Oder mag das jemand von Euch übernehmen?
Hubert87 (2020-07-08 12:29:04+00:00): Ok,
ich schau mir das gleich mal im Detail an.
VG Hubert87
maraf24 (2020-02-13 15:20:14+00:00): Życzę powodzenia w jeżdzeniu wózkiem inwalidzkim po schodach.
bxl-forever (2020-02-11 21:31:43+00:00): Hello,
If we set the name of a shop both on its node and on the entrance node, there is a high risk that when a shop changes, somebody will edit the map and forget to change one of them.  Perhaps we’d better just set entrance=yes and no names.
Jakka (2020-02-12 07:36:54+00:00): Correct, but with all those entry's, private and shops I thought better to add them as the annoniem note poster puts them on the note map, its a risk we have to take.... If a see an poi like shop on shape of building I remap them to node... when shop changed the building tag stay's good
bxl-forever (2020-02-12 10:21:43+00:00): BTW, congrats for all the work you are doing with those notes!
532910 (2020-04-19 12:16:37+00:00): Вот вы нарисовали footway 691123467, ок, молодец, но почему в метре от него нарисованный unmarked pedestrian crossing я за вами удалять должен?
RusFox (2020-04-19 14:31:23+00:00): Во-первых, повежливее, пожалуйста. Иначе я перестану реагировать на вас вовсе.
Во-вторых, почему за мной?
В-третьих, попробуйте пользоваться более продвинутым редактором и обратите внимание на комментарий к моей правке. Тогда вы увидите, что пользователь разрушил и удалил дорогу, замапленную одной линией и нарисовал ее двумя линиями. При этом он не удалил точки дороги с оставшейся  линии, которая превратилась в границу, а на новые линии дороги точки дороги (переходы, светофоры, пересечения) не нанес. Я и так поправил очень много чего, этот косяк просто не заметил. А накосячил пользователь, потому что, как и вы, использовал редактор iD
dmfr (2024-09-16 16:33:54+00:00): Olá! Porque é que o Campus Académico e o Instituto Politécnico de Viseu são objetos separados? Se o Campus todo pertence ao IPV, diria que seria natural que a área do campus estivesse como name=Instituto Politécnico de Viseu, e o "Campus Politécnico" estivesse codificado como "addr:housename=Campus Politécnico".
TCVizeu (2024-09-20 14:28:18+00:00): Na altura achei melhor que toda a área fosse designada por Campus, porque dentro do campus existem vários departamentos, mas tens razão.
eggie (2020-02-10 14:55:43+00:00): Dag Wietse..  Realiseer je dat elke upload met veranderingen ook werkelijk op de wereldkaart komt.
Een adres hoort niet nogmaals op het gebouw zelf getagd te worden.
Ik haal het adres even weg.
Succes met mappen voor "missing maps". 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-10 14:57:37+00:00): reverted by changeset  #80802820
francians (2020-02-10 17:22:19+00:00): Hello,

Can you please restore the building names? "casa mia" is not useful for the map purpose...

Puoi per favore ripristinare i nomi degli edifici? "casa mia" non è utile ai fini della mappa

Grazie
Francesco
Jrachi (2020-02-10 17:27:23+00:00): Ciao.
Da quel (poco) che hai mappato mi sembra ci sia la voglia di fare qualcosa per OSM.
Ma, attento che mettere "non lo so" dove è richiesto un numero, o assegnare il name "casa_mia" o "casa del mio vicino" ha un significato solo per te.
Mentre lo scopo della mappatura è di fornire dati utili e "VERITIERI"
Se usando il preset di ID ti chiede troppe informazioni, non compilare quei campi dove non conosci il valore (o magari del significato)
Jrachi (2020-02-10 17:42:22+00:00): Ancora due osservazioni.
1) Evita di fare changeset così grandi, denotano poca professionalità
2) Hai toccato alcuni punti del Rio Grande?
Cioè hai spostato dei punti che definiscono il confine tra United States of America ed il Messico?
Occhio che potrebbe arrivare la CIA a casa tua a chiederti qualcosa...
E gli basta guardare la mappa per capire dove abiti...
Ovviamente scherzo!
Ma vorrei solo farti capire che mappare è bello, ma non è un gioco!
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-06-28 00:28:44+00:00): Olá LucFreitas,
neste objeto natural = água (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/771336979) Encontrei problema de cruzamento.

você se importaria de consertá-lo? deixe-me saber se houver dados de atualização.

obrigada
===============================

Hello LucFreitas,
on this natural=water object (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/771336979) I found a crossing issue.

would you mind to fix it? let me know if any an update data.

Thank you
eggie (2020-02-10 14:46:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Supaplex (2023-08-22 06:40:10+00:00): 這邊沒有道路噢
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771338293/history
應該是誤加的
Supaplex (2023-08-22 06:41:12+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/771338293
archie (2020-02-10 15:47:36+00:00): This letter box (tps://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7200644046) what would be access=no. Aren't access-tag rather useless in this case?
Warin61 (2020-02-10 21:33:15+00:00): Please explain:

Source of boundary for 'Cobargo Apex Park'. 

Source of name for 'Cobargo Apex Park' and why you deleted the name 'Cobargo Town Park' as seen on the LIP Base map.

Source of the name 'Sculpture Walkway'.

Source of the path 'Sculpture Walkway'.

Source for the barrier Way: 771340263 - particularly where hidden under the bridge and trees.
Hb- (2020-02-11 00:14:49+00:00): 'Cobargo Apex Park' is the common name for that area. It is local knowledge.

The boundary is clearly visible in the LPI aerials. 

Nobody uses 'Cobargo Town Park'. A web search for this term gives zero results. Seems that the LPI map guys are the only ones using it.

The sculpture walkway has it's name from the sculptures it is leading to. This is local knowledge in Cobargo. Formerly it was called Riverside Walk too.

You can see the handrail in both sources attributed in the changeset comment. No need for writing them down again here.
Hb- (2020-02-11 00:16:51+00:00): >Source of the path 'Sculpture Walkway'.

You can see the bridge over the drain in the LPI aerial.
eggie (2020-02-10 14:38:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Op een steiger kan natuurlijk wel een pad ingetekend zijn. Nu staat er allerlei accesstags zonder dat er een pad aanwezig is? 
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2020-02-10 14:47:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question to  http://www.osm.org/node/7200707043 : What is the meaning of payment:espece, 
payment:sans_contact (ddi you mean payment:contactless)?
eggie (2020-02-10 14:45:06+00:00): Dag B Verburg  Het is niet nodig om nog een keer een adres toe te voegen aan het gebouw. Er is al een adresnode aawezig. Hier zou de rest van de info ook bij kunnen incl een office=company tag om de naam te laten renderen. 
Kijk je nog even?

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-02-10 16:27:59+00:00): De info heb ik naar de adresnode verplaatst. Duplikaatadres heb ik verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
archie (2020-02-10 15:45:49+00:00): Would you please fix this. Outline of building should be done at building's base not at building's roof. 
Inside this building is node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7155776917 with partly the same information as on building. Dublette.
Building is not rectangle.
eggie (2020-02-10 14:50:23+00:00): Dag Stan.. dat zal weinig van doen hebben met Missing maps. Probeer dan gewoon in te loggen in www.openstreetmap.org en bij upload commentaar toe te voegen welke bij de edits hoort. 
Succes verder,
Eggie
mueschel (2020-02-13 16:21:48+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!
what does 'targa' mean? This key is not used on any other object.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5824149263

Thanks!
frosm (2020-04-16 08:07:08+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
lorsque vous entrez un commentaire pour votre modification, essayer de décrire votre modification. parce que "j'espère que c'est bon" n'est pas très pratique pour comprendre ce que vous souhaitez modifier.
J'ai constaté que vous avez ajouté 3 magasins, l'un d'eux sur le batiment.
Une petite remarque à ce sujet : on ne met un magasin sur un batiment que si le commerce occupe tout l'batiment.
Merci pour votre contribution et bonne continuation.
❤️‍🔥 (2020-02-29 04:15:43+00:00): Hi, you added 30+ buildings on Hillary Cresent, Everleigh Road, Lowe Street, and more which do not exist.
eggie (2020-02-10 15:03:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2020-02-20 05:54:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 81252695 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3509].
Israel Hiking Map (2020-03-19 13:23:10+00:00): Hi bentzy and thanks for contributing!
Can you please explain why this is a tourist attraction? both the image and the place on the map doesn't seem to qualify this place as "interesting"...