piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
newpavlov (2017-11-07 07:27:02+00:00): Во-первых, украинское и российское АТД на территории Крыма на данный момент (поправьте если не прав) полностью идентичны, я никоим образом не буду возражать если вы включите "российское" АТД в украинскую иерархию с помощью роли subarea, поэтому делать и поддерживать дубликаты отношений считаю совершенно нецелесообразно. Во-вторых, для "российского" Черноморского СП даже статья на википедию ведёт на "uk:Чорноморське (АРК)". В-третьих, то что вы называете "украинским АТД" было ошмёточными (два СП тут, одно ГП там и всё) и не поддерживаемыми украинским сообществом (ситуация тут напоминает отношения дорог), плюс насколько я понимаю текущие "российские" отношения АТД были созданы на основе отношений существовавших до 2014-го. В-шестых, про "оскорбления и игнор", голословных утверждений я наслушался от вашего товарища Богдана, не советую идти таким же путём. Ну и в седьмых, принцип ToG, если не ошибаюсь, даже по украинским нормам работающих (а не просто существующих на бумаге) местных украинских администраций не существует, в отличии например от того же правительства АРК.

Выложил ссылку на данный вопрос на форуме, дальнейшее обсуждение продолжу там:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=24613&p=42

Откат без прихода к какой-то общей договорённости приведёт к обращению в DWG. Можете спросить у Богдана как кончились мои предыдущие обращения.
user_6110846 (2017-11-07 07:37:58+00:00): в болоте Крыма  (отношения ) черт сломит ногу туда лезешь и не контролируешь емоции - лезут  наружу внутрешние черти  . Я как раз собирался  в ДВГ отправлять по поводу https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5997031/history#map=12/45.5228/32.6938 . Как будет так будет.
fantomas (2017-11-07 09:17:56+00:00): People write that "Poliakoff Mykhailo" is "Bondar Bohdan". (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=661779#p661779)
msevilla00 (2017-03-26 15:31:34+00:00): Hola, me he fijado que tus comentarios de los conjuntos de cambios son muy escuetos. Te sugiero, aunque sea más esquemático, que pongas: Edificios Torrero (Zaragoza)
De ese modo un usuario que no te conozca y vea tu changeset a nivel global se podrá hacer una mejor idea de lo que has hecho.
;-)
eggie (2017-03-26 16:29:21+00:00): yes... prima zo  :)
eggie (2017-03-26 16:30:08+00:00): In het begin volgen wij startende mappers. Ook om te helpen... vandaar..
MiriamHaije (2017-03-26 18:09:56+00:00): Ik snap het, ondanks alle handleidingen blijft het begin best wel lastig. Ik zal rustig aan beginnen met het in kaart brengen van mijn eigen omgeving (Leeuwarden). Bedankt voor je opmerkingen!
eggie (2017-03-26 18:49:24+00:00): Strak plan... We maken wel eens anders mee. Bezoek zeker ook het forum van OSM. Daar krijg je zeker antwoord op evt. vragen. Je kunt je evt. voorstellen onder het draadje "Welkom". https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
user_5359 (2017-03-26 17:11:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I can believe the guidance of the railway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11563784#map=19/40.85507/-74.09658. 

The branch is not connected to the main track, but to the country boundary (Even before your change).

I can't see the wall you mentioned in the comment.
bhousel (2017-03-26 17:44:54+00:00): Hey @scetron, welcome to OpenStreetMap.. I filled in some of the details around this new train station based on more updated 2015 aerial imagery.  

When mapping in New Jersey, we have access to free imagery provided by the our wonderful state government.  You can open up the "Background" pane in iD and switch between Bing and the NJ 2015 layer for comparison.  NJ 2015 is a little slower to load and not always as clear as Bing, but is a few years newer.

Thanks for your contribution :)
scetron (2017-04-04 17:15:13+00:00): Thanks for the input! This one was bugging me because it's a convoluted area and a new station. The rail spur there actually goes to a NJ Transit building. I'll be sure to check out the NJ aerial maps for future edits.
DaveF (2017-03-26 21:32:39+00:00): Hi
What is the source of knowledge for your numerous & widespread maxheight edits?
ndm (2017-03-26 23:25:03+00:00): As above. Plus, 11'9'' is a perfectly acceptable maxheight -- there is no need to convert it (approiximately) to metres -- should only map what is signed.
cdavila (2017-03-27 14:31:06+00:00): The source is data already in OSM coming from nodes tagged maxheight=*. In case of doubt, bing imagery is used to clarify. As a background, I usually keep the original node, so that anyone can check the information and the source if it contains one.
@ndm: you are right, but meters is the default value according to maxheight description in the wiki (1), but there's no problem in leaving it in feet.
(1) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight
DaveF (2017-03-28 11:32:24+00:00): Ah, I understand you now. I thought you were moving tags, but you're in fact interpreting them to add additional ones. Unsure if hgv=no on a way is required when there's a maxheight on the entrance, but does no harm, I suppose. Cheers.
eggie (2017-03-26 16:34:07+00:00): Het is absoluut niet de bedoeling om landuse te verwijderen en om te taggen in park. Graag reactie van je motieven.
eggie (2017-03-26 17:30:14+00:00): It's not done to remove the landuse park and forest. Leisure= park is the use in general. You need to map it on top of the landuse forest and grass. 
You have a lot of good edits by the way. We follow the starting mapper to give assistence... so please answer the remarks on your edits in the changesets: aanmelden om mee te praten.
I'll revert this changeset ...
eggie (2017-03-26 17:39:27+00:00): restored 3dshapes.. The artworks are still there.
eggie (2017-03-26 20:38:03+00:00): Middels PB hier over contact gehad. 
De bedoeling is dat het park "Potgietersingel" als een deken los over de landuse wordt gelegd zonder aan iets te plakken. leisure=park en name=Potgietersingel
eggie (2017-03-26 20:42:28+00:00): Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47178168#map=17/52.53191/6.05354
heb ik ook even landuse in het park aangebracht en de leisure park laten staan.
manings (2017-03-27 17:51:35+00:00): There some duplicated roads added in this changeset.  Remove a few but some edits touched relation leaving that untouched.
PlaneMad (2017-03-31 05:08:21+00:00): Hi Arshy, welcome to OSM. This is a live map seen by millions of users. Please don't use it for testing, i'm reverting your edits.
km2bp (2021-09-26 21:55:39+00:00): Ten budynek do poprawki gdyż przecina się z innym i nie posiada żadnej wieżyczki na rogu przy krasnalu
km2bp (2021-09-26 21:56:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/482848112   Ten budynek do poprawki gdyż przecina się z innym i nie posiada żadnej wieżyczki na rogu przy krasnalu
5m4u9 (2017-03-26 19:08:05+00:00): no añadir datos privados al mapa, borraré
marc__marc (2021-03-12 12:04:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4756497824
it's an embassy ? witch country ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:diplomatic=embassy
Regards,
Marc
eggie (2017-03-26 17:23:28+00:00): I see two buildings on top of each other. Is thats your intention.?
eggie (2017-03-26 17:17:03+00:00): The name of this fountain isn't watersculptuur.
Why did you delete the bicycleparking?
Please answer..
farmal (2019-07-23 02:51:57+00:00): "Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across these ways between

way 557212832 
way 542090842
way 542090841
way 542090840
way 542090823
way 542090839 
way 542090831
way 542090830
way 542090829
way 542090828
way 542090827
way 542090826
way 542090825
way 542090824
way 542090844
way 542090843
way 542090837
way 354789503
way 542090836
way 542090835
way 542090834
way 542090833

classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-28 04:31:53+00:00): Ways 542090842 and 542090841 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090842, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090841) are believed to be mapped as an unclassified highway because they might carry more traffic in the surrounding residential area. Though I'm fine if it's going to be downgraded as residential ways.
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-28 04:37:15+00:00): I guess the same might apply to

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090823
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090839
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090831
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090830
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090829
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090828
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090827
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090826
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090825
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090824
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-28 04:42:13+00:00): On top of that, these may be downgraded as residential highways:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090843
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090837
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090835
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090834
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090833
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-28 04:44:03+00:00): Also, maybe this as well:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090840
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-28 04:45:36+00:00): However, I don't think this should be upgraded into a residential highway. If I recall correctly this leads to a few houses that are not built together as a housing estate.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557212832/
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-28 04:49:03+00:00): These highways should stay as unclassified because obviously they carry more traffic anywhere across the residential area.

Source? Personally surveyed manually this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354789503

These are not have been manually surveyed but I think following the above argument, they should stay as they are.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090844
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542090836
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-28 04:52:29+00:00): Sorry for the delay in responding for your changeset discussions, for I was having other commitments lately. I will try my best to respond to each one. On top of that, I live across this particular area of the world and contributed to OSM for more than 5 years in this same area.
naoliv (2017-10-07 17:14:06+00:00): Precisa ter cuidado com realinhamento dessa forma. Acabou distorcendo.
Nem sempre imagem de satélite nova é mais alinhada ou correta.
Владимир К (2017-05-10 08:24:15+00:00): то что вы отметили стадионом быть не может. Leisure=stadium это сооружение со зрительскими трибунами для просмотра матчей/соревнований вживую. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure%3Dstadium
Исправил. 
осталось добавить спорт
mavl (2017-03-27 17:30:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. В России принято соглашение об именовании улиц  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог]  
По этому соглашению улицу нужно назвать «улица Мелиораторов», но не «Мелиораторов улица».  
Если кратко, то «улица Пушкина», но «Пушкинская улица».
eggie (2017-03-26 17:43:31+00:00): I see a abuilding on top of a building. 
You changed the landuse=commercial into a building.
dachefte (2017-03-31 09:23:34+00:00): Die bauliche Trennung ist hier strittig (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37705427). Ich finde es etwa seltsam, nach nur 5 Tagen einfach Daten zu löschen. Die Begründung mit den Navi ist hoffentlich nicht ernst gemeint...
user_367191 (2017-04-01 04:04:33+00:00): Welche konkreten Probleme gabs denn beim Navigieren? War vielleicht der Bürgersteig einfach nur nicht richtig oder vollständig eingetragen?
Ohne Beispiel finde ich die Löschung unangebracht, mit der Begründung "nicht nötig" könnte man alle Bürgersteige und noch vieles anderes löschen...
Graf Westerholt (2017-04-02 04:57:58+00:00): Doch, die Begründung mit dem Navi war enst. Allerdings hätte man man auch bicycle=no eintragen können, die Löschung war wohl etwas voreilig. Siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57806 Dazu https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57863

Ich hätte nach links in die Dümptener Straße abbiegen sollen, aber das Navi wähnte mich auf dem Fußweg, welcher ohne Abzweigung auf die Dümptener Straße führte, und hat daher keine Richtungsanweisung gegeben. Ich war aber auf der Fahrbahn der Oberhausener Straße und bin dieser daher weiter gefolgt.
eggie (2017-03-26 18:44:01+00:00): De info van Dirk heb ik op de Bag adresnode huisnr 30 gezet. 
https://www.dirk.nl/winkels
Hjart (2017-03-26 17:59:58+00:00): Hvad har du lavet med landuse polygonen omkring Villestofte? De fleste erfarne gør et stort nummer ud af så vidt muligt at bevare historikken på eksisterende objekter og historikken på denne her er røget sig en tur nu. Har du klippet polygonen op og så slettet den del, historikken var på?
DaxServer (2017-03-27 05:17:18+00:00): Hi. Please write a better changeset comment! "Bing" doesn't convene information. Thanks!
hadw (2017-03-26 17:43:52+00:00): You are still creating changesets with only "Bing" in the comment.  Please outline what you are doing, why you are doing it, and either in the comment, or source tags, from where you got the information.
chandusekharreddy (2017-03-26 18:04:19+00:00): Bing is the source and I am digitizing roads
DaxServer (2017-03-27 06:23:59+00:00): https://www.dropbox.com/s/uwg4rn6815ahn2q/Screenshot%202017-03-27%2011.48.49.png?dl=0
Tiamate (2018-01-22 14:37:20+00:00): Bitte entferne deine PokemonGo Elemente oder alle deine Änderungen werden automatisiert entfernt.
DannyAiquipa (2017-05-25 14:12:39+00:00): Hello! Can you confirm if currently exist leisure =pitch on the beach? What source did you use for adding these objects?
DannyAiquipa (2017-05-25 14:12:54+00:00): Regards!
Danny
KR-KRKR-KR (2017-05-27 05:37:01+00:00): Hi Danny,
thank you for your interest & question.
Please see changeset tag "imagery_used".
Best
KR

ps: Do you want to go there for playing? :-)
bhousel (2017-03-26 18:08:49+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
jeka p (2017-04-02 14:48:48+00:00): Hallo,

für Fussballplätze und ähnliche Objekte Area ist immer besser, als Node.
Ein zusätzliches Node ist nicht notwendig.

Node leisure=pitch habe ich gelöscht

LG,
Yevheniy
jeka p (2017-04-02 14:54:12+00:00): Hallo,

gibt es mehr Info zum "Türkischen Konsulat"?
z.B. Website, Nummer, Adresse usw.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4756660268/history

Konsulat soll auch entsprechend markiert werden:
diplomatic=consulate
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:diplomatic%3Dconsulate

Gruss,
Jeka
jeka p (2017-09-09 11:58:02+00:00): shop name soll ohne "Fa.", "Firma" oder sonstiges sein. Für Firmen bitte office=company benutzen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office=company?uselang=en
frasty (2017-09-19 14:06:35+00:00): Ciao sembola, un tratto (#482887844) di strada comunale m.marittima-accesa è indicato con access=no. Mi pare di averla percorsa quest'estate, forse era stata chiusa solo temporaneamente per lavori?
Sembola (2017-09-19 17:05:48+00:00): C'è il cartello di divieto di transito sia in alto che a Capanne,  ma senza altre avvertenze. O almeno, c'era quando ci sono passato a primavera... le bici passano, ma a stretto senso del CdS il divieto vale per tutti...
Sembola (2017-09-19 17:06:59+00:00): Controllato, l'ho fatta il 25 marzo.Ora chiedo ad un amico sul posto.
Sembola (2017-09-20 08:01:08+00:00): confermo, divieto sempre presente
frasty (2017-09-22 19:51:34+00:00): ok, grazie
eteb3 (2024-09-29 08:40:29+00:00): Hi

I was just wondering if you remember why you tagged the footpath under Sounding Bridge as “former cycleway”? 

It’s still marked on OS maps as a traffic free route, and signs at the bridge itself have “cyclists dismount “ - so arguably still a cycle way? (I just about managed without dismounting fwiw!)

But if there’s been some official change then that makes sense

If you can remember from 7 years ago…

Happy mapping
Commodoortje (2017-03-26 19:32:01+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-03-26 19:35:42+00:00): Vreemd dat deze mutatie niet in de gemeentelijke BAG (Basisadministratie Adressen en Gebouwen) is opgenomen.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?searchQuery=van%20der%20Loostraat%205%20Veen&objectId=0738200000010263&geometry.x=135695.15128125&geometry.y=421192.19415625&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0738010000004806
Je zou kunnen overwegen om een terugmelding te maken aan via het potlootje op vermelde link.
.
De tagging is niet geheel goed gegaan, de adresnode heb je als building=yes aangegeven.
Ook heb je de adressering dubbel op de panden.
Mocht je vragen hebben stel ze dan gerust.
Arie van Loon (2017-03-27 07:02:11+00:00): Dank, die tagging was even wennen. BAG snap ik ook niet, want het huisnummer 5 is op 7/2/2017 ingetrokken door de gemeente en op dezelfde datum is 5 en 5A verleend. PostNL heeft 5A al opgepikt. Misschien is de procedure zo snel doorlopen dat de BAG nog even tijd heeft. Het klopt in ieder geval wel ;)
Commodoortje (2017-03-27 08:14:44+00:00): Ik zag dat de overzijde van de weg ook wat nieuwbouw is verrezen.
Zal vanmiddag even kijken voor een bag update.
Commodoortje (2017-03-27 19:17:06+00:00): De tagging heb ik voor je aangepast.
Hier kun je zien wat gewijzigd is.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47209933
Avlaak (2017-03-27 11:34:35+00:00): Уважаемый, ваши правки нарушают граф дорог, прошу прочитать https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway

Так же про граф можно посмотреть тут
http://checker.osmlab.tk/qa/RU-IVA/routing-map
Gazer75 (2017-03-27 12:14:21+00:00): Please do not move house number nodes to buildings. they should be left as separate nodes. Helps verification and updates from official data later.
Gazer75 (2017-03-27 12:16:29+00:00): I see you actually added the addr tags to building. This creates duplicates as we use separate nodes in Norway.
maraf24 (2017-03-26 20:51:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4756764231
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4756764229
Czy tourism=information jest tu odpowiednie?
user_4493657 (2017-03-27 01:32:00+00:00): poprawiłem
ulmtuelp (2017-03-28 10:48:10+00:00): Hier ist auf dem landuse=residental bestimmt die q-Taste gedrückt worden und dabei ist die Landfläche rechtwinklig geworden.
lexaikon (2017-03-28 19:19:43+00:00): verdammte Axt. Bloß gut, dass hier noch jemand aufpasst ;)

Sorry - ich ziehe das wieder krumm :)

Axel
lexaikon (2017-03-28 20:35:35+00:00): erledigt.
JeroenHoek (2017-09-27 11:35:18+00:00): Hallo,

Ik heb de pizzeria (Sardegna) amenity=restaurant gemaakt i.p.v. amenity=marketplace, dat zal een foutje geweest zijn bij het invoeren?
Dakon (2017-10-29 11:15:23+00:00): Du hast an einigen Hydranten fire_hydrant:count getaggt. Ich vermute, du meinst die Zahl oben rechts auf den Hydrantenschildern. Diese Zahl gehört in das Feld "ref".
snodnipper (2017-04-20 23:34:03+00:00): Hi 3yoda, there appears to be a large number of attributes that have been removed.

Original http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313036846/history vs http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483131490

Are you planning to add those attributes?
snodnipper (2017-04-22 20:01:23+00:00): I have now restored the attributes.  http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48043191
snodnipper (2017-04-22 20:06:53+00:00): FYI, the new attribution has increased the relevance within nominatim from 0.301 to 0.7511771902, helping to ensure that it has a good search position.
neuhausr (2017-03-27 15:13:41+00:00): Hi, the consensus tag for places like this is leisure=fitness_centre. Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre for more info.
Piskvor (2017-03-28 13:07:21+00:00): Ahoj,

díky za nová data v OSM! Mám ale dotaz: to předchozí číslování odpovídalo oficiálnímu stavu v katastru nemovitostí - je to teď správně vůči reálnému stavu? A které to číslování je teď správně? (data v addr:housenumber teď neodpovídají addr:streetnumber)

Mapování zdar,
Piškvor
Vit Hojdar (2017-03-29 14:06:19+00:00): Ahoj,
ano, nový odeslaný stav souhlasí se skutečností. Čísla orientační máme číslovány směrem od silnice, přičemž jeničku má budova 32/1 (ta je dobře), pak to stoupá z leva do prava od severního domu (čp 33) na jih (až k čp 37).
Na mapy.cz se to zobrazuje správně.
Někde jsem už také viděl to otočené číslování, ale skutečnost je jak píšu. Poslal bych i fotku(y), jen tu nevidím možnost přidat obrázek :-)
Piskvor (2017-03-29 14:09:29+00:00): Aha, tak to je super zpráva, díky! Jenom teda bude potřeba ještě upravit i addr:streetnumber (č.orientační), aby i to odpovídalo realitě. Zvládneš to, nebo to mám opravit podle toho addr:housenumber?
Vit Hojdar (2017-03-30 08:16:36+00:00): Už na to koukám, vidím. Jo, zvládnu. Původní prvotní změnu jsem dělal na mobilu, až teď jsem se naučil používat i PC.
Susanna Rius (2017-03-26 20:32:16+00:00): Modificació de La Perxada de la Font (afegint un camp) i edició de varis senders
luschi (2017-04-10 17:07:30+00:00): Hi GLS-67,     
connection to highway=rest_area/services should be highway=motorway_link and not service.     
Here te link to the Wiki http://goo.gl/ZojWSh     
regards
snodnipper (2017-04-02 22:01:28+00:00): I see that "The Wizarding World of Harry Potter" was removed in this changeset.
May I ask if this was deliberate as it is a feature that tourists use in relation to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wizarding_World_of_Harry_Potter.

Thanks.
snodnipper (2017-04-23 18:37:36+00:00): I have restored the locality.  Thanks.
Mike Baggaley (2017-04-05 21:36:15+00:00): Hi, home you don't mind me mentioning, but access=designated (as specified on ways 482913717 and 482913719 in this changeset) is an invalid combination of tag and value. You can find more information at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Ddesignated

Cheers,
Mike
INeilC (2023-10-09 00:52:28+00:00): Thanks, Mike
Vincent de Phily (2017-03-26 22:22:32+00:00): Seems like you replaced the multipolygon with a simple closed way to fix the rendering ? It works in the sense that the feature should now render as you expect, but you miss out on details that you had initially added.

The better fix would have been to tag the multipolygon relation with the relevant tags (amenity=police, building=*, name=*...). 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3 an especially the "relation" link.

It's a great idea to try out different editors like you did. But Potlatch2 is a bit akward to edit relations with.
user_5359 (2017-03-27 15:50:01+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Dein Geschäft kann auch direkt mit shop=hearing_aids gekennzeichnet werden (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhearing_aids)

Die Parkflächen werde ich noch überarbeiten, eine doppelte Kennzeichnung als Fläche und Punkt ist erstmal nicht nötig.
iey6Om7C (2017-03-27 06:34:45+00:00): У переезда в Ольгино светофор вроде бы только для пешеходов перед перекрестком. Или что-то уже поменялось?
yuryleb (2017-03-27 08:10:58+00:00): Пересмотрел вчерашнюю запись с регистратора повнимательнее - да, ошибся, светофор только на переходе. Скоро исправлю обратно.
iey6Om7C (2017-03-27 10:39:52+00:00): Спасибо!
SomeoneElse2 (2017-03-26 21:35:23+00:00): Thanks for the update - if "MMT/7/1" is the PROW reference, maybe add it as a "prow_ref" tag?
Best Regards,
Andy
saikabhi (2017-03-27 16:59:13+00:00): Hi,

Again similar issues in this changeset as to this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47188620. When we delete buildings instead of modifying it, we lose some important information. 

Thanks,
Abhishek
Владимир К (2017-03-27 09:11:00+00:00): Не очень понятно что вы хотели сделать. Расскажите.
oini (2017-03-27 06:32:25+00:00): I have reverted all your edits since they were vandalizing the map. Please be careful not to add fictional features to the map hereon.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-13 08:50:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1859414337/history - skąd ten link? Zdjęłem go ale może czegoś nie zauważyłem i był OK