piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2021-12-02 20:24:28+00:00): #TIP: Instead of moving the object, the imagery may be not aligned well. You can change the imagery alignment in the editors background icon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114466146
tamism (2021-12-29 02:13:59+00:00): This is not Cowrie Bay. That's already mapped on the other side of the peninsula.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 03:20:31+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153272762
ezekielf (2021-12-02 04:39:06+00:00): https://osmus.slack.com/archives/C3LJ03BCY/p1638162053104400?thread_ts=1637039485.038000&cid=C3LJ03BCY
BerZ (2022-01-01 18:30:04+00:00): Приветствую! Если Вы правили контура около Партизанского водохранилища - почему севернее пропал лес? И что за контур по снимку Вы правили?
besgeo (2022-01-02 21:30:47+00:00): Приветствую! Правил контур береговой линии водохранилища. Лес не удалял. Севернее вроде все на месте.
besgeo (2022-01-02 21:35:52+00:00): Вот южнее леса нет. Там ошибочно стоит тег natural=scree на мультиполигоне. Но это не я его поставил.
besgeo (2022-01-02 21:37:42+00:00): Уже исправил.
besgeo (2022-01-02 21:57:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115686576
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115686911
tonyf1 (2021-12-03 06:37:20+00:00): Hi, thank you for your contributions to Open Street Map. Can you please contact us or if you are editing under someone else's supervision, for example a school teacher, can you please ask them to contact us here or by email to https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au thanks
tonyf1 (2021-12-03 06:38:27+00:00): Hi thank you for your contributions to Open Street Map. Can you please contact us or if you are editing under someone else's supervision, for example a school teacher, can you please ask them to contact us here or by email to https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au thanks
tonyf1 (2021-12-03 06:39:07+00:00): Hi thank you for your contributions to Open Street Map. Can you please contact us or if you are editing under someone else's supervision, for example a school teacher, can you please ask them to contact us here or by email to https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au thanks
nevw (2021-12-02 05:50:11+00:00): Hi
the tag place=isolated_dwelling is not suitable.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Disolated_dwelling
GOwin (2022-02-08 03:25:55+00:00): Maraming salamat sa pag-aambag ng datos sa OpenStreetMap, lalo na sa mga lugar na liblib!  👌
Ahmad Fawad Hassan (2021-12-02 06:19:50+00:00): That is nice near to hostel
Ramesh1987 (2025-04-05 08:40:20+00:00): Thank you Ahmad
ivanbranco (2021-12-02 15:10:14+00:00): Hi Lancelotance,

as another user already asked you (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114387813) would you please consider adding a meaningful changeset comment?

See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Good_changeset_comments
Herman Lee (2024-05-18 02:43:20+00:00): 该修改集已退回
archpdx (2021-12-02 07:12:29+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Something's gone wrong here: it looks like you dragged a node from a building (https://www.osm.org/way/327015560) and added a tree in the middle of the street (https://www.osm.org/node/9301974688).

I highly recommend you use one of the aerial imagery options (Bing is the clearest in this area) instead of OSM so that you can easily see where the trees are at - some trees you added in this changeset are in the middle of driveways.

It also looks like the names of the trees you added relate to their scientific species name. I highly recommend looking at (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:taxon) as we don't use the name tag to describe features (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions).

If you have any questions or need further help feel free to respond to my comment.

Thanks,
archpdx
archpdx (2022-01-15 20:37:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in changeset 116196359
nimrodxx (2022-04-16 15:30:26+00:00): Wo hast du das Riesenrad in Bilm her???
eggie (2021-12-02 09:07:01+00:00): Dag Jelle.. Volgens de BGT ook.
Eigenlijk mag je google niet als bron gebruiken in OSM. De BGT wel.
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=246417.74&geometry.y=575033.36&zoomlevel=13.61

Het is in ieder geval weer correct nu. 

MVG
eggie
archpdx (2022-01-15 20:38:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in changeset 116196381
user_2066394 (2021-12-02 21:59:59+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
Kovoschiz (2021-12-11 10:57:08+00:00): 1. Please don't delete to directly connect stairs.
2. Those are `barrier=hedge`, not `natural=tree_row`.
user_5359 (2021-12-02 07:55:54+00:00): Sorry: Correction of changeset comment.
Move wrong admin_level tag to note. Clear self overlapping boundary!
eggie (2021-12-02 09:03:31+00:00): Dag Kees...  Volgens de BGT heet het hier de Abrikozenweg.
Of de weg terugkomt en in welke vorm  kun je hier navragen door een opmerking op de kaart van het Kadaster te plaatsen.
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=93698.87&geometry.y=462468.54&zoomlevel=13.25

MVG
eggie
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-04 18:39:55+00:00): Hi!  The preferred tagging for river areas in the US is natural=water + water=river.  You can find it under Presets->water->river.

waterway=riverbank was deprecated back in 2011 and really shouldn't be used anymore:

See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Water_details
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-04 18:43:02+00:00): I also noticed that you put a name on the river area.  River areas should not have names, names only go on the waterway=river line.

Here's a YouTube video from a past OSM US Mappy Hour where I discuss best practices in river tagging:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5YwXDKGr2Y

Happy mapping!
Nzara (2022-01-02 12:25:46+00:00): Hallo  jmarchon

bei deinem Changeset hast du auch den Umriss einiger Gebäude verändert. (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53609250). Es scheint, als hast du nun auch Balkone hinzugefügt. Balkone sind auf einem Luftbild nicht immer einfach vom eigentllichen Gebäudekörper zu unterscheiden, sie gehören aber nicht zur Grundfläche des Gebäudes. Bitte versuch zuerst die wahre Grundfläche eines Gebäudes zu ermitteln, bevor du solche Veränderungen vornimmst. Einige Hinwseise dazu findest unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building#Wie_mappt_man_Geb.C3.A4ude

Beste Grüsse
jmarchon (2022-01-03 21:09:05+00:00): Hallo,
Danke fuer die Tips.
:)
jmarchon
Nzara (2022-01-09 17:14:37+00:00): Hallo jmarchon,

Ich wäre dir dankbar, wenn du deine bisherigen Edits in Hinblick auf die Thematik überprüfen könntest. Wenn etwas zum schlechteren verändert wurde, sollte das wieder rückgängig gemacht werden.  

Vielen Dank, beste Grüsse
Frans S (2021-12-02 09:04:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Reminder: please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114472299
martin-kokos (2022-01-09 14:11:40+00:00): Why do you add these buildings when cannot be seen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114472770
Samwel Kyando_Import Account (2022-03-08 07:56:03+00:00): Thank you for the comment but in this project Special high resolution satellite imagery aligned to existing mapping (MB TILES)
martin-kokos (2022-03-08 18:35:23+00:00): Thank you. So those are not normally publicly available I assume, or are they?
Samwel Kyando_Import Account (2022-03-14 07:06:18+00:00): Yes martin.
they are not publicly available, most of these are for private projects.
martin-kokos (2022-03-14 09:08:17+00:00): That's unfortunate. Thanks for answering my questions. Have a nice and successful week.
rab (2022-03-15 17:20:38+00:00): Most of these buildings are quite small.
Some are less than 5 m² in size.
To me, that also seems a bit suspicious.
kombe1207 (2022-03-16 10:25:54+00:00): Hello, the spotted area is the tourist place in Zanzibar and probably has many huts that are found in the Tourist hotels, as the part of  the project was just remote mapping and few data collection in few wards but was not validating the buildings.
In addition to this, these are the coastal areas with a lot of beaches surrounds, so having the small size is normal,

Thanks
segubi (2023-11-01 10:06:22+00:00): Bezüglich der Relation 13501997: Die ausgeschilderte Route - wenn da die mit dem Schäfer tatsächlich gemeint ist, ist die "Spökenkieker-Route", inzwischen als Relation 15975653 angelegt (weiterhin allerdings auch noch nicht ganz komplett, aber fast), so dass ich die Relation 13501997 jetzt lösche und hoffe, das ist ok so... Grüße, Sebastian
Max Tenerelli (2022-08-16 11:01:02+00:00): Ciao, per quale motivo hai cancellato i segmenti 146344670 e 213544859 dalla relazione "Sentiero delle Sette Pietre"? Inoltre potresti spiegarmi che senso ha la relazione 13502117 ("from"="Castelmezzano", "to"="Pietrapertosa")?
eggie (2021-12-02 10:09:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Beter niet de combinatie maken access=no  (Gebiedsverbod.. Verboden Toegang)  met foot=yes
Je pad rendert ook nauwelijks op de kaart.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-02 10:30:29+00:00): access=no (Bijna altijd verkeerd gebruikt) heb ik omgezet naar access=private met foot=permissive.
tracktype=grade5 toegevoegd.
Het zal routeren voor wandelaars. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-02 10:11:41+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Editor iD heeft de neiging overal alles aan elkaar te plakken. De linker alttoets gebruiken voorkomt dat.
Ik zal de landuse even losmaken. 
De track (veldweg eindig op het fietspad en niet op de Junnerdijk. 
Voor wie is het hier verboden?  Wel bord staat vooraan.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-02 10:19:55+00:00): Wellicht 
access=private met 
foot=permissive 
op het Landgoed?

MVG
eggie
rab (2021-12-03 22:05:31+00:00): Hi, what is the scope of #hotosm-project-11862? I can’t find the project page. Are you the project manager?
aweech (2021-12-02 14:06:08+00:00): Hi,
This feature represents the Wasatch Mountains. The Wasatch Mountains are not entirely a plantation. In fact, most of it is barren rock and scrubland, and the rest is largely a untouched between sporadic thinnings. If you know of any tree plantations on the edges of the National Forests, please feel free to create areas for those.
francians (2021-12-02 12:30:50+00:00): Ciao, il tratto di strada a tetto Veglia, va collegato con la traccia inserita.

Francesco
sektov (2022-05-26 14:34:40+00:00): Why have you removed them (after first creating them)?
MS50 (2022-05-26 18:05:57+00:00): Hi Sektov, 
the Trail was entered as waymarked trail, in violation with the rules for waymarked trails, as it is not waymarked. I did not see any other option.
Best,
Max
sektov (2022-05-27 18:23:42+00:00): I will restore them with a custom relation type.
Frans S (2021-12-02 11:24:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114476327
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
literan (2021-12-02 16:00:41+00:00): вы зачем-то внесли линии без каких-либо тегов. Что они означают, непонятно. 

также, в качестве источника правки вы указали сайт kladbisha-moskvy.ru.
На нем внизу указано "© 2008-2021 Ритуальные услуги Все права защищены "

Внесение данных из несвободных источников в OSM запрещено. Поэтому эта и аналогичные ваши правки подлежат откату. Пожалуйста, вносите в базу OSM только то, что вы видели лично (либо данные из свободных источников или предоставивших персональное разрешение на внос данных).
maraf24 (2021-12-19 23:02:25+00:00): A skąd to wiadomo?
Lola Fox (2024-12-21 19:14:21+00:00): I'm live near Ravenna city and here there isn't any restricted area . Can you delete it?
literan (2021-12-02 15:58:22+00:00): и зачем эти фейковые дороги?
Моисей нашего времени (2022-03-05 16:52:24+00:00): https://anonfiles.com/d2g0g5M4x4/IMG_20211207_114824_jpg
literan (2022-03-05 17:51:02+00:00): что? 
ссылка эта не открывается.

вы данной правкой добавили улицу, автодорогу через все кладбище
ZB_BN (2021-12-08 16:14:32+00:00): Was meinst du mit "Gewidmete Eisenbahnstrecke, mit Gleisen (zu 80%)."? Worauf beziehen sich die 80%?

Da wo der Oberbau bewusst und gewollt abgebaut wurde habe ich abandoned getagged. Damit ist meines Erachtens nicht die Aussage einer Entwidmung verbunden.
gallseife (2021-12-08 16:25:05+00:00): die wikis sagen zu abandoned:
Ehemalige Strecke ohne Schienen.
A tag to map former railways.

Die Strecke in Rede ist aber nicht ehemalig sondern defekt.
Sie ist gewidmet und mit bestelltem Nahverkehr und es gibt intensive Planungen zur Wiederinbetriebnahme. Selbst "disused" ist laut wiki und üblicher Verwendung eigentlich falsch, aber irgendetwas muss ja da stehen und railway=rail wäre auch ziemlich unpassend bei dem Zustand ;).
ZB_BN (2021-12-08 17:27:29+00:00): Das verstößt aber gegen das "on-the-ground"-Prinzip, wonach nur Tatsächliches gemappt wird, keine Interpretationen.

Eine "Widmung" bedeutet nicht, dass dort Schienen liegen.

Bestellter Nahverkehr bedeutet nicht, dass dort Schienen liegen.

Fakt ist: Nahezu alle Schienen dort wurden abgebaut.

Somit wäre es "abandoned".

Eine Garantie, dass Schienen genau auf der alten Trasse wieder aufgebaut werden, gibt es überhaupt nicht.

Von der Flut zerstörte Häuser und Straßen dürften dann auch nicht gemappt werden, weil der Eigentümer vor hat, sein Haus irgendwann in den nächsten Jahren wiederaufzubauen?
eggie (2021-12-02 11:34:44+00:00): Dag Mitchel..  Lijkt me kloppen die verbinding.
De accesstags tussen het fietspad en de track Junnerdijk heb ik verwijderd. Dat zal buiten de hekken liggen.
Gr eggie
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-04 06:03:26+00:00): Removed SEO spam description=* and image=* tags on City Residential POI in changeset 183625348

https://osm.org/changeset/183625348
Patchanka (2021-12-02 20:22:53+00:00): bonjour Alban
pourquoi cette modif du type "mural" à "streetart" ? Il me semble que "streetart" est une qualification plus générique.
La plupart des autres fresques murales à Bayonne sont bien en artwork_type=mural
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1dIe
Donlooba411 (2021-12-02 22:42:41+00:00): Bonsoir Laura, c'est une erreur de ma part ; je corrige, merci.
J'étais au tél avec Stephane en train de parler de requêtes diverses et je m'interrogeais sur la pertinence de ce type d'attribut...
Patchanka (2021-12-04 10:06:40+00:00): ok, merci :-)
Vinber-Pro (2021-12-03 09:41:35+00:00): Bonjour,
j'aurai tendance à penser en opening_hours=May-Oct ? une note cela ne sert pas vraiment si ce n'est aux autres contributeurs (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:note).
à creuser
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114478448
Clotildebisca (2021-12-03 10:27:38+00:00): Bonjour,
En effet, je me suis posée la question et je n'ai pas trouvé d'exemples pour ces fermetures saisonnières en fait..
Vinber-Pro (2021-12-03 10:36:31+00:00): je dirai que c'est plutôt de l'ouverture saisonière (hihihi) et donc par exemple https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114681815 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by accounts related to reports from the community in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5507 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114681815 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by accounts related to reports from the community in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5507 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114681815 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by accounts related to reports from the community in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5507 .
carfog81 (2021-12-03 20:29:46+00:00): Please do not damage multipolygon relationships or administrative boundaries.
MakinIsland (2021-12-06 23:36:41+00:00): Hi carfog81, Thank you for keeping an eye on the data here and reaching out. In order to add the missing one-way at way 542289650 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542289650), I needed to split the way here, which added a member to these relations, but still accurately maintained the relation members through this area. Was there a specific issue that you found with this change?
carfog81 (2021-12-09 16:48:01+00:00): Hola, el daño estuvo en la vía 459680049 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459680049). Ya lo organicé
MakinIsland (2021-12-16 03:19:58+00:00): Thank you.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114681815 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by accounts related to reports from the community in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5507 .
GinaroZ (2022-01-17 23:11:46+00:00): Hi, I'm assuming that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9303695226 is just the instore bakery and not a separate shop?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114681815 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by accounts related to reports from the community in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5507 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114681815 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by accounts related to reports from the community in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5507 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114681815 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by accounts related to reports from the community in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5507 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114681815 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by accounts related to reports from the community in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5507 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114681815 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by accounts related to reports from the community in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5507 .
eggie (2022-12-07 10:14:27+00:00): Uitzonderingen op oneway yes  tweewielers zijn inmiddels toegevoegd
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114681815 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by accounts related to reports from the community in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5507 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-12-08 01:27:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114681815 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits by accounts related to reports from the community in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5507 .
skyper (2021-12-03 13:32:59+00:00): Salli Halbtax
Bitte achte beim Erstellen eines Multipolygon auf die Mitgliedschaften in Relationen. Diese müssen ebenfalls angepasst werden indem die Linie durch die MP-Relation als Mitglied ersetzt wird. Habe es mal für die beiden Bahnsteige 2/3 und 4/5 nachgeholt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114523451).

Eine andere Frage ist das Löschen der "Verbindungslinien" innerhalb der Flächen. Ich finde sie auch nervig, aber ich bin mir nicht sicher ob Mentz GmbH oder die Deutsche Bahn AG sie verwendet.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
Halbtax (2021-12-04 06:16:49+00:00): Sali skyper

Danke für deinen Hinweis. 

Ich hatte vor einiger Zeit intensiv in Schaffhausen zu tun. Nun habe ich Details ergänzt, die bisher gefehlt haben und das entfernt, was vor Ort nicht mehr vorhanden war. Schliesslich soll die Karte die aktuelle Situation zeigen ;-) .

Gruss
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
gscholz (2021-12-04 05:35:28+00:00): Hi Fathima Faizeen,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=32.91683&lat=2.87799&zoom=16&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114480637

Can you please fix this?
Guido
gscholz (2021-12-04 05:33:07+00:00): Hi Fathima Faizeen,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=32.91683&lat=2.87799&zoom=16&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114480651

Can you please fix this?
Guido
gscholz (2021-12-04 05:32:38+00:00): Hi Fathima Faizeen,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=32.91683&lat=2.87799&zoom=16&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114480652

Can you please fix this?
Guido
gscholz (2021-12-04 05:33:35+00:00): Hi Fathima Faizeen,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=32.91683&lat=2.87799&zoom=16&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114480679

Can you please fix this?
Guido
gscholz (2021-12-04 05:34:57+00:00): Hi Fathima Faizeen,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=32.91683&lat=2.87799&zoom=16&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114480707

Can you please fix this?
Guido