piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ALu68 (2022-06-14 06:30:48+00:00): Hallo Pietz, du hast doch amenity=childcare schon auf das Gebäde gesetzt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116028410/history 

Aber childcare ist nicht mehr zulässig: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=childcare?uselang=de "Dieses Tag wurde in einer Abstimmung ausdrücklich abgelehnt" --> kindergarten

Nach der Beschreibung ist der Krümelhof aber kein Kindergarten, siehe https://www.kruemelhof.de/kontakt/ "Meine Qualifikationen 
Rechtsanwaltsfachangestellte, Heilerziehungspflegerin, Traumapädagogin (DeGPT) Traumapädagogin Schwerpunkt Pferd (IPTh), Reittherapeutin (IPTh und BFR), Reitpädagogin, Fachberaterin für Tiergestützte Interaktion, Fachkraft Autismus."

Es ist mehr eine Tier-Sozial-Event-Hilfs-Einrichtung??? Irgendwas Undefinierbares.

* building=yes ist falsch, da die Fläche kein Gebäude ist
* layer=1 is sinnfrei
* name="Krümelhof - Tiergestützte Pädagogik" der Name ist nur der Name, nicht die Zusätze https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Gruß. Andre
pietz (2022-06-14 08:04:33+00:00): layer=1 kam automatisch weil die Straße gequert hat, habe ich entfernt.

So richtig gute Kategorien gibt es für den Krümelhof nicht, stimmt. Gerne verbessern, wenn du eine bessere Idee hast.

Grüße
Pietz
ALu68 (2022-06-15 06:50:11+00:00): Streichelzoo ist eine gute Idee.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-13 20:00:59+00:00): Hello,
As requested at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6059 , what was the source of the data used to add https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9815570430 ?
Best Regards,
Andy
Glassman (2022-06-14 00:42:16+00:00): Interesting. I like that you used power lines but we do need to come up with better terminology. I'll ask the community for help and let you know what they recommend.

i Just started updating towers in Skagit County. But when I look at the FCC records, nothing shows up for the Jim Creek Naval Radio Station.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122341305
j-alex (2022-06-14 03:18:34+00:00): Thanks, not sure why FCC doesn't list it but it's a very real transmitter. Not sure if it's okay to string 'power lines' between radio towers, or even if 'radio tower' is the right term for these support masts. I guess they hold up an antenna, so...?

(also it'd be nice to include the vertical supply lines from the valley floor that connect to the lower power way, but I have no idea how to define the mid-span nodes that'd require.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122341305
Dodko (2022-06-14 07:45:01+00:00): Súpisné číslo 1443 majú v občianskom preukaze obyvatelia tejto bytovky.
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/856941/2297_1?pos=48.992012,22.155754,19

Táto budova má v registri adries určené súpisné 4118. Ak je chyba v registri adries treba požiadať mesto Snina o opravu adresy, ak je chyba v katastri tak kataster.
Pri volaní na linku 112 a nadiktovaní adresy 1443 pošlú záchranárov do bytovky.
tenzul (2022-06-13 22:48:36+00:00): Hallo mappingMapMan,

der Weg "Im Hofacker" kommt mir etwas verdächtig vor. Kann dafinitiv sein du hast Recht, aber so, wie es eingetragen ist, heißt es folgendes:

Es ist ein verkehrsberuhigter Bereich ("Spielstraße") in dem implizit maximal Schrittgeschwindigkeit zu fahren ist. UND dort müsste ein Schild mit roteingekreister 10 hängen.
Wahrscheinlichtrifft nur eines davon zu. In verkehrsberuhigten Bereichen sollte deswegen kein maxspeed gesetzt werden. Siehe Hinweis im Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street#Hinweise

Bei den access Tags (bicycle, foot, horse,...) kannst du alle mit yes weglassen (das ist der Standardwert). Sonst hätte man bei jeder Straße eine rießen Liste für alle erdenklichen Fortbewegungsarten.

motor_vehicle=permit ist auch eher selten. Wenn du "Anlieger frei" meinst, kannst du motor_vehicle=destination verwenden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122341557
Thierry1030 (2025-04-09 19:17:16+00:00): Dag Eebie,
Volgens deze website is in Landwaartslaan 11
het restaurant "Sapori della Nonna" gelegen.
https://www.saporidellanonna.be/
Eebie (2025-04-10 13:32:44+00:00): Toen ik er in 2022 langs kwam zal het nog  La Pizza geweest zijn. Ik heb het aangepast.
InfosReseaux (2024-01-01 21:24:33+00:00): Bonsoir

Il y a dans ce changeset le chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170270925 qui a été modifié avec des informations très précises.
Elles ne sont pas exactes et je vais les retirer.
Ce n'est pas la première fois que je constate des ajouts provenant de sources nationales IGN, RTE ou autre mais il faut les manipuler avec plus de discernement s'il vous plaît.
Il faut vérifier et recouper ce que ces sources peuvent indiquer avec un niveau de précision aléatoire et moins fin que ce qu'on a sur OSM.

Bonne soirée
Danalieth73 (2024-01-01 21:41:21+00:00): Bonsoir,

J'ignorais que les données Osmose pouvaient être erronées, j'ai passé pas mal de temps à en ajouter à droite à gauche issu, je pensais bien faire. Sur quelles sources fiables peut-on se pencher - autre que le passage sur le terrain - pour compléter ces données ?
InfosReseaux (2024-01-01 21:47:24+00:00): Ces dernières années, il y a deux problèmes principaux :
* Les analyses osmose pouvaient dire des bêtises, on corrige progressivement
* Les données ouvertes sources peuvent elles aussi comporter des erreurs.
Il n'y a pas de règles universelles. Quand un signalement apparaît, il faut se demander si c'est bien vrai. Essayer de demander à des gens ou de regarder des photos, en parler à d'autres contributeurs, etc...
Pour l'électricité, il y a le rendu Volta : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Serveurs/tile.openstreetmap.fr#Rendu_%22Volta%22_des_r%C3%A9seaux_%C3%A9lectriques

Faire confiance à l'aveugle n'est pas toujours porteur de succès. C'est la valeur ajoutée d'OSM de vérifier sur le terrain, même si cela nous pousse à faire moins en quantité.
Lejun (2022-06-16 09:16:28+00:00): Ça semble correct.
Patr1k_P (2022-06-15 07:31:35+00:00): podla coho ma ten chodnik taky nazov?
Milan Gr (2022-06-15 13:30:57+00:00): Táto miestna časť sa nazýva Breh
Patr1k_P (2022-06-15 13:51:39+00:00): Môže byť, ale nenazyva sa tak aj chodník
Milan Gr (2022-06-15 15:02:55+00:00): Asi viem ako ho tu nazývame...
Patr1k_P (2022-06-15 15:40:20+00:00): Nazývať ho tak môžete, ale oficiálne meno asi nemá ak tam nie je nejaká tabuľka s názvom
Milan Gr (2022-06-15 16:32:42+00:00): To, že tam nie je tabuľka, neznamená, že to nie je oficiálny názov... Alebo inak - ak tam niekto dá - napríklad z recesie - tabuľku Štrbské pleso, znamená to, že sa to tak má nazývať?
Milan Gr (2022-06-15 16:34:21+00:00): resp. aj oficiálne názvy, ktoré niekto niekedy dal na tabuľky boli vytvorené na základe nejakého predošlého pomenovania priestoru...
Patr1k_P (2022-06-15 16:50:02+00:00): Ak tam nie je tabuľka alebo nie je uvedený niekde inde zdroj, tak to nemá žiadny názov.. To by potom mohla mať názov hocijaka lesná cesta alebo chodník len kvôli tomu že to je v nejakej oblasti ktorá sa tak nazýva
Milan Gr (2022-06-15 17:39:38+00:00): vy to nechápete... Tento chodník každý nazýva Chodník na Brehu... nie len preto, že je to v tej oblasti... od nepamäti.... Ale nikto tam tabuľku jednoducho nedal.. miestni to nepotrebujú (možno zatiaľ), ale pre cudzích je uvedenie názvu v mape možnosťou orientácie.... stačí pre zápis do mapy, že tak sa tento chodník zapisuje napr. do obecnej Kroniky? lebo jednoducho má také pomenovanie....  A teraz mi ešte vyriešte záhadu Hermanovského potoka, ktorý sa v južnej časti chotára mení na Hermanku -  Hermanka je pritom stáročný názov vodného toku...  Zrazu sa však pred pár rokmi začalo v niektorých zdrojoch objavovať poslovenčené Hermanovský potok... Myslite si, že je to správne? A čo je vlastne správne? Hermanka či Hermanovský potok?  Len preto, že názov Hermanka nebol na žiadnej tabuľke tak sa má začať používať niečo umelé? To je ako keby sa niekto odrazu rozhodol rieku Torysu nazvať  Torysska rieka (lebo pramení v katastri obce Torysky)...  Obec Hermanovce nemá pomenované ulice, nie sú tam na žiadnych tabuliach uvedené ani názvy miestnych častí... To znamená, že pre orientáciu nemožno do mapy zadať historické názvy, ktoré sa zjavne z dlhodobého hľadiska meniť ani nebudú?
Patr1k_P (2022-06-15 18:22:50+00:00): Pozrite ja tu nie som žiadny odborník na názvy... Mapuje sa realita a treba vychádzať aj z nejakých zdrojov, ktoré sú dostupné, aj mám pocit že sú biedne... Ako by asi vyzerala mapa, keby si každý v svojej obci dopĺňal objekty podľa toho že sa im tak hovorí? Asi by to moc prehľadné nebolo... Musí sa predsa od niečoho vychádzať... Ak miestni poznajú niečo od nepamäti pod nejakým názvom, dá sa použiť tag locname...to isté platí aj o miestnych častí, tagy na to sú, skúste naštudovať z wiki... Ulice ak neschválili vo VZN tak skrátka nie sú, toto záleží na danej obci.. K potokom sa vyjadriť neviem
Patr1k_P (2022-06-15 07:39:23+00:00): smerovnik bol uz tu

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2126765267
Milan Gr (2022-06-15 15:06:14+00:00): Vidno že nepoznáte miestne reálie - sú tam dva smerovníky, vyznačený bol turistický smerovník, aj to na zlom mieste, keďže reálne je umiestnený viac na severozápad a nie v strede križovatky....  Ja som pridal smerovník navigujúci k miestnej zaujímavosti - ku Glorietu...
Patr1k_P (2022-06-15 15:41:21+00:00): Ok
Truchin (2022-06-16 07:12:26+00:00): Bonjour Christophe,

Pour cette voie, c'est un simple double sens cyclable avec quelques bandes d'amorce en carrefour. Mais pas une bande cyclable dans les 2 sens. J'ai corrigé.

Bonne continuation.

Thomas
Christophe Raverdy (2022-06-21 11:36:46+00:00): Bonjour Thomas.

Je débute avec StreetComplete. Je confirme pour les bandes d'amorce aux extrémités avec plusieurs représentations d'un cycliste en sens inverse (sur le côté gauche).
mavl (2022-11-24 13:39:16+00:00): This changeset is reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-13 23:33:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122346780 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of undiscussed edits in West Africa. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122344531
SomeoneElse (2022-06-13 23:28:39+00:00): Hello,
The current mapping in this area is the result of a community discussion, which resulted in https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 . If you think that the current mapping is incorrect then please do discuss with the rest of the OSM community - at the moment, the main talk list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk is probably the best place to do that.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-13 23:33:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122346780 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of undiscussed edits in West Africa. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122344531
SekeRob (2022-06-17 12:10:43+00:00): Hi,

Se lo stesso di Unicredit Bank aggiungere tags
brand = UniCredit Bank
brand:wikidata = Q45568

se no, aggiungere

not:brand:wikidata = Q45568

ciao
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-12 19:45:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124830458 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism by Jimbo the Geographer
user_5359 (2022-06-15 09:40:45+00:00): Hello! Please use for the keys explicitly British English. For more details have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.

Use diameter_crown instead of diametro.
mariotomo (2022-06-14 00:57:00+00:00): hola. te he buscado unos ejemplos de como utilizar los turn:lanes.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jhX
dado que por supuesto no soy yo quien pone las reglas, por favor pide apoyo a la "community.openstreetmap.org". a lo mejor te estoy sugiriendo mejorar algo que ya está perfecto, y con gusto lo escucho de la comunidad.
mariotomo (2022-06-14 23:45:51+00:00): también hay esfuerzos dentro de Latam para alcanzar algo de formación de comunidad. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:LatAm
mariotomo (2022-06-15 17:12:20+00:00): with this changeset you added several objects of type way, tagged as bus=yes; public_transport=platform, where we already had nodes (Way: 1069427290). this is a violation of the DRY principle (don't repeat yourself), which, within OSM, is the guideline 'one object for one feature' https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
mariotomo (2022-06-15 17:13:34+00:00): overpass query to find public_transport platform inside public_transport platform:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jml
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-17 11:54:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122505071 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping in Canada and Guyana
KleinerHund (2022-06-13 23:07:44+00:00): Nachtrag: Ich bin Anwohner:in. Der ursprünglich eingetragene Weg ist ungenau eingezeichnet. Bis zum von mir neu festgelegten Punkt ist er eine private Zufahrt zu Haus 46. Darüber hinaus handelt es sich um einen üblichen Gartenweg zu Wohnhaus 47 (Eingang rückseitig). Die Idee des ursprünglich Eintragenden ist für Paketdienste schon hilfreich, aber die Umsetzung nicht korrekt.
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-30 13:26:52+00:00): Hi DressyPear4,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
DressyPear4 (2022-07-31 09:28:03+00:00): Eu usei este plugin
https://github.com/JOSM/areaselector

Depois Shif+Y para reduzir a quantidade de nós.
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-31 09:34:56+00:00): Thanks for your answer.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-17 11:54:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122505071 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping in Canada and Guyana
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-17 11:54:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122505071 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping in Canada and Guyana
ElliottPlack (2022-12-07 22:48:32+00:00): Hi Michal! What sort of barrier is the one at the entrance to the tunnel? A bollard perhaps?
migurski (2022-12-07 22:55:53+00:00): I think it was more like a gate at the north end of the tunnel. We didn’t get that far because they were working inside it, but you could enter the tunnel from the south at least part-way.
ElliottPlack (2022-12-07 23:09:40+00:00): oh, I see now about the detour so this make more sense! thanks for tagging it. I just asked the 9/11 Trail folks if they'd like the trail rerouted to follow the detour during the closure.
avinet_ua (2022-06-18 07:25:07+00:00): -
Warin61 (2023-05-01 01:38:07+00:00): Hi,

I'm rather confused by the multiple tags on this object. 

A water well. 

And a bubbler - projects a small jet of water upwards for drinking. 

If it has both of these it may be better to separate them .. the well as a way and the bubbler as a node???
rskedgell (2023-05-01 02:17:51+00:00): It's probably better to revert to historic=building or use historic=yes
Warin61 (2023-05-01 07:10:36+00:00): Is it a current source of water?
LockOnGuy (2022-06-14 00:37:38+00:00): Thank you so much for the correction of my mistake. I added the name as 'name:en' instead of 'name' thank you! and keep up the good work!     
I will add the English names soon for these buildings, Thanks again.     
Regards.
LockOnGuy (2022-06-14 01:32:16+00:00): Done in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120567989
LockOnGuy (2022-06-14 01:33:01+00:00): ^ wrong link,     
Correct link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122348021
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-14 01:45:36+00:00): porque voce removeu as vias internas do frigorifico?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-18 14:06:50+00:00): edição revertida,  usuário removeu vias internas do frigorifico e nao respondeu porque.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-13 23:33:13+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 122344248, 122344531.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-13 23:46:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122346924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting another undiscussed edits in West Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6070 .
5m4u9 (2022-06-14 03:11:14+00:00): hmmm, "Adela Zamudio" neighbourhood is not admin_centre of boundary, just coincidence of names. I think is better converts old admin_centre to node.
user_8101879 (2022-06-21 13:05:49+00:00): Ok.
Best regards
woodpeck (2022-06-14 11:36:54+00:00): Hello 1T-Money, the data contributed by txemt which you here claim to have been "sloppy" was totally within usual quality standards in OSM. It would not have been necessary to edit after them, and it *certainly* is inappropriate to call these edits "sloppy". 

Please stop this aggressive behaviour, and stop demonstratively "improving" contributions by txemt when they are not plainly wrong.
mariotomo (2022-06-14 00:35:42+00:00): hi Brayan. welcome back to OSM. please have a look at "turn:lanes", they are meant to represent lanes with compulsory direction, allowing for navigators to inform you that you should move to a specific lane of the same road. if you create fictive roads, the navigator will give instructions that will be difficult to understand, like moving to a different parallel road where there isn't any.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122347159
user_5359 (2022-06-15 08:49:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/920681366 (one of four ways). What is the meaning of the tags
acces_1 = emergency
access = official
see wiki 
...
Do not use official to tag roads reserved for official traffic (police, fire brigade, customs et al.). 
...
txemt (2022-06-15 12:33:06+00:00): It's not for emergency use, it's for official use for NTTA vehicles.
user_5359 (2022-06-15 13:21:59+00:00): Did you see that you have a typo of access ?
txemt (2022-06-15 14:17:57+00:00): Fixed it. I'm fixing all of them, now. Thanks, good catch.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-17 11:54:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122505071 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping in Canada and Guyana
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-15 00:42:46+00:00): Hi thewrathoxic!

Welcome to OSM and thank you for your contributions so far!

You've added some recreation grounds in this backyard here. What are they? Recreation grounds are normally used for open spaces that contain sports pitches and similar features. If it's just a house's deck or similar, it's probably not a recreation ground by OSM definitoons.

We should also limit the mapping for private usage, you can read more on the wiki here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-17 11:54:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122505071 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping in Canada and Guyana
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-17 11:54:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122505071 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping in Canada and Guyana
mueschel (2022-06-18 14:27:39+00:00): Could you check this route? It didn't get the proper tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14226117
Lejun (2022-06-23 13:22:59+00:00): Moi j’veux bien, mais faut le documenter, parce qu’en l’état…
DressyPear4 (2022-06-19 18:01:10+00:00): Olá, building corresponde apenas a área edificada e não ao lote todo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122347863
santamariense (2023-02-18 20:06:56+00:00): Aproveito a carona para relatar outros erros para os quais deve-se atentar. Lembro que isso é uma padronização. No OSM, cada característica vai em sua própria tag. 
.
Atenção:
- Não se deve colar a geometria dos prédios ao eixo das ruas
- Não se deve abreviar nome de ruas, nem mesmo o tipo do logradouro (Sempre Rua, Avenida, Alameda, etc e nunca R., Av., Al. etc)
- Os CEPs das ruas não devem ir na tag name. Para isso existe a tag postal_code.
- Na tag surface, deve-se usar apenas os valores em inglês. "Terra", por exemplo, não é um valor reconhecido. Consulte a wiki [2] para padronizações.
- O número da casa deve ir sempre em "addr:housenumber" e nunca repeti-lo em na tag "name".
.
Vamos para um exemplo:
Esta rua [1] atualmente está com as seguintes tags:
 -  highway=residential
 -  name=R Princesa Isabel - CEP: 47634-085
 -  surface=terra
Porém o correto seria:
 -  highway=residential
 -  name=Rua Princesa Isabel
 -  postal_code = 47634-085
 -  surface=earth

[1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406997481
[2] - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:surface

Qualquer dúvida contate a comunidade no telegram: @OSMBrasil_Comunidade
Becky Candy (2022-06-15 08:16:29+00:00): To ensure buildings/highways do not cross or connect, zoom right in and carefully place the building corners. If a road overlaps a building you should feel free to adjust the position of the road before mapping the building. Thank you for mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122348122
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-06-14 11:18:34+00:00): This does not exist. Please do not add non existing data.
zzptichka (2022-06-14 12:54:40+00:00): It's a known vandal who keeps creating new accounts. Reverted and reported.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-06-14 13:15:14+00:00): Yes, I reverted every changesets from this user. This is a clone of omarsoukhane from last months.
MxxCon (2022-06-16 04:19:10+00:00): This user continues to map imaginary roads.. :/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122348203
Supaplex (2022-06-14 06:35:53+00:00): 你好，台灣 name:zh 是用繁體中文的，非簡體中文。是否能夠改正?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122348780
cnvery (2024-12-09 15:41:40+00:00):  你好！已修正，谢谢提醒！
Warin61 (2022-06-14 06:15:28+00:00): OpenTopoMap is CC-BY-SA 

and therefore NOT suitable for use is OSM. 

Reverting.
Warin61 (2022-06-14 06:20:20+00:00): Reverted.
Supaplex (2022-06-14 06:36:01+00:00): 你好，台灣 name:zh 是用繁體中文的，非簡體中文。是否能夠改正?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122349000
cnvery (2024-12-09 15:20:52+00:00): 你好！已修正，谢谢提醒！
Supaplex (2022-06-14 06:36:09+00:00): 你好，台灣 name:zh 是用繁體中文的，非簡體中文。是否能夠改正?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122349121
cnvery (2024-12-08 04:25:45+00:00): 你好！已修正，谢谢提醒！
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-10 13:51:33+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249314637/history has shop = building that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=building ? Are they selling houses? Products for furnishing house? Something else?
RedAuburn (2022-06-15 22:57:41+00:00): Thank you for the much-needed changes to the cycling infrastructure :)

The landuse changes aren't ideal though, mapping landuse to the pavement edges is a fairly standard practice for micromapping, so I've reverted those to how they were before.

Although this edit wasn't perfect, many thanks for all your road/transport/cycling work across London :)
jleedev (2022-06-14 05:01:55+00:00): Vandalism, reverted.
Warin61 (2022-06-14 06:20:38+00:00): Reverted
Warin61 (2022-06-14 06:20:44+00:00): Reverted.