piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
axelr (2018-11-29 17:09:50+00:00): public_transport=platform ist dort, wo Passagiere auf das Fahrzeug warten. Es ist egal ob die die Zähne geputzt haben oder auf vergoldetem Boden stehen.

Die Platform ist nach ptv2 ein way oder ein area. Der Node ist die Ausnahme.
Nakaner (2018-11-30 08:36:59+00:00): Hallo Lukas,

nur damit du die Wikiseiten zum VRR nicht falsch verstehst: Die VRR-Wikiseiten ist nicht eine Empfehlung, was für den VRR (als Anstalt öffentlichen Rechts) getaggt werden soll, sondern worauf sich Mapper im März 2015 in Dortmund bei einem ÖPNV-Treffen geeinigt haben (ich war dabei).

Viele Grüße

Michael
user_3022894 (2018-11-30 18:45:49+00:00): Okay, danke euch beiden. Ja, gut zu wissen mit den Wikiseiten. Habe das jetzt besser verstanden, dass es auch so gemacht werden soll. Nur irgendwie wurde das Problem, wo highway=bus_stop hin soll, für mich gefühlt nicht ganz gelöst. Aber naja. Hintergrund ist, dass ich gerade versuche, mir einen eigenen Renderer zu "bauen", der PTV1 und PTV2 vernünftig rendert, es aber nicht hinbekomme, da ich immer doppelte Plattformen erhalte. Ja ich weiß, es wohl aussichtsloses Unterfangen. Aber egal, das gehört hier nicht rein. Okay bis vielleicht demnächst dann mal.
axelr (2018-12-03 08:46:29+00:00): Das Problem wo highway=bus_stop hingehört, lässt sich nicht lösen, da man immer irgend einer Regel widerspricht.
user_3022894 (2018-12-03 18:18:33+00:00): Oh, hihi, ja allerdings. Nun ja. Zumindest weiß ich dann nun Bescheid, ;)
Andreeeee (2018-12-04 07:41:54+00:00): farmland to teda v chyni neni (zahrady na jih od ul. Severni) :-) nastavil som to s5 na garden...
JandaM (2018-12-04 08:17:02+00:00): Data jsou brana podle RUIAN parcely. Ja si je nevymyslim. Dekuji za opravu.
  Jinak me RUIAN parcely prijdou lepsi nez neci omalovanky "lesu" ktere jdou pres budovy a protinaji se ostatnimi polygony. Viz. jina mista.
Andreeeee (2018-12-05 06:28:40+00:00): to sice nepopiram ze z geometrickeho pohladu su ruian lepsie nez ked si to "niekto" maluje ruco. Na druhej strane zahrady jizne (kolem ulic zapadni/stredni/vychodni; napr. way #649557489) vobec nezodpovedaju realite.
Andreeeee (2018-12-05 06:39:52+00:00): kazdopadne dik za zmazanie ostatnych zahrad, to bola fakt prinosna zmena.... /s

su niekde guidelines ohladne "overlapping areas"? nemozem nic najst, ani inspector nic nerve...
JandaM (2018-12-05 07:14:56+00:00): Myslim ze je pouzito village_green, misto garden - opet problem zdrojovych dat. Ale jinak polygony odpovidaji. Kontroloval jsem to podle leteckeho snimku. Samozrejme chybi prijezdove cesty...
  Na druhou stranu se mohou vygenerovat silnice lepe odpovidaji skutecnosti. Ne jen s odhadnutou sirkou podle typu silnice. (analyzou a vyplnenim ploch mezi zeleni/zahradami).
  Pro me jsou nejvetsim problemem omalovanky (nesedici a posunute objekty) nez vyznam zelene. Chyne je prikladem. I veto oblasti byly nesedici objekty. V OSM je dost lidi kteri si kresli pro ne vyznamne detaily ale ze jsou o nekolik metru mimo to jim nevadi. Garden/Village green se lisi dost casto jen v moznosti pristupu. Oboji obsahuje travu, stromy a kere. A aby zahrada skutecne fungovala ma mit doplneny plot/pripadne zivy plot, vstup... 
  PS jen se divim kolik cizincu ma zajem o kvalitu ceskych OSM map.
Andreeeee (2018-12-05 11:27:50+00:00): village_green/garden+private ma vobec nepali, zamapuj si to ako chces (aj ked zrovna tu ta druha varianta sedi asi lepsie).

Problem je, ze pred domami su spis len parkoviska prerusovane kvetinaci, nez nejaka suvisla plocha zahrad (viz napr. streetview/mapy.cz). Tzn. polygony z katastru nesedi s realitou, tecka. Tvoja varianta nie je o nic lepsia ako ta predtym, dokym to fakt nebudes po metri prekreslovat - a to teda neviem ci ma cenu pre kohokolvek.

Posunute objekty, shit happens, ano... to je realita. U zelene to IMO nijak extremne nevadi, podla toho sa bezne nenaviguje. Mna teda osobne viac nebavia vesnice komplet v sive barve, ked ma ale kazdy dom zahradu, a dokonca i panelaky mavaju casto zelen vo vnitrobloku... Nechapem ze to potom mas potrebu este mazat, pretoze to tam o meter niekde nesedi (co zrovna IMO ani nebol pripad tu; overlap s budovami je uz plne minor problem z mojho pohladu).

PS: 5% obyvatel CR su cizinci, niektori dokonca ziju i v Prahe a okoli ;-) A to este keby si zistil kolko nahodnych turistov opravuje OSM po celom svete...
JandaM (2018-12-05 11:44:22+00:00): 1m metr je pro me docela velky rozdil stejne jako prekryvajici se polygony (pripadne male mezery mezi nimi). Algoritmus nemuze rozhodnout co je spravne. Pro renderovani OSM ve 2D se pouziva obezlicka ze mensi plocha prekryva vetsi neni-li specifikvovano jinak.
  Az se nekdy pokuste z OSM vygenerovat 3D objekty, korigovat vyskopis a zkouset nad daty vypocty asi zmenite nazor.
  Ze to vypada hezky/spravne (=omalovanky) na mape jeste neznamena ze data jsou poradku a je mozne je dale zpracovavat.
JandaM (2018-12-05 11:53:04+00:00): Cizince: Nemyslel jsem zrovna ty kteri ziji u nas. Napr. tento tyden jsem komunikoval s nemci a jinymi narodnostmi ohledne editaci v CR. I kdyz tady nejsou a nevedi jak to tady chodi. Jinak druhy nejhorsi byl slovak ktery sedel v blave. Opravoval a komentoval cizi editace dat v Praze. Kde nejspis v zivote ani nebyl (jednalo se o aktualni stav veci)
Andreeeee (2018-12-05 19:41:31+00:00): Samozrejme ze chapem ze data sa pouzivaju i na strojove spracovanie, kedysi som sam GIS sw programoval... Ale to rozhodne nie je zdaleka jedine (a zrejme ani najcastejsie) pouzitie OSM, takze priste by som doporucil bud nevyhovujuce data ignorovat vo vasom sw, alebo pridat tag fixme/map note. Mazat vo velkom cudzie data, ktore prejdu validatorom, pretoze zrovna vam nevyhovuju, mi pride dost bezohladne...
aceman444 (2020-11-05 17:55:24+00:00): Aj tu rovnake podivne predlzenie 2022. Aky je zdroj? Uvadzate len snimky Bing, kde samozrejme cisla ciest nemozete vidiet, takze trochu zavadzate a iny zdroj ste neuviedli.
tux67 (2018-11-28 10:29:22+00:00): Auch hier teils redundante Daten an Gebäude und Node. Daten eines Vormappers habe ich jetzt hier teilweise gelöscht, da die Hausnummer u.a. falsch war.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64938756
RicoElectrico (2018-11-27 18:53:18+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za lepsze opisy zmian. Od razu lepiej i od razu można Ci powiedzieć, że edycja do uzupełnienia. Sama zmiana nazwy ulicy nie wystarczy - adresy do niej przypisane trzeba także poprawić.
Poczytaj: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59305 oraz https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=23753
adamsc (2018-11-27 19:01:44+00:00): Dzięki za uwagę, nie pomyślałem o tym. Już poprawione
habi (2018-12-10 09:39:54+00:00): Please draw square buildings, like this it doesn't really help...
VA00 (2024-03-27 05:43:54+00:00): Być może czas zdegradować ul. Mochaniec do residential. Obecnie to strefa tempo 30, co kilkadziesiąt metrów poprzecinana wyniesionymi skrzyżowaniami równorzędnymi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26989323
Yunkers (2024-03-29 13:20:05+00:00): Hej, widziałem ostatnio nowe znaki ale nie miałem jeszcze okazji ich wrzucić. Ale ogólnie jestem za - droga traci znaczenie dojazdowe.
aytfadc (2019-04-12 10:23:12+00:00): Bonjour,
access=no
l'accès est vraiment interdit?
mavilleavelo08 (2019-04-12 13:07:30+00:00): Bonjour.
A propos de quelle modification (sur les 20) précisément et pour quels usagers (cyclistes ? piétons ?)
aytfadc (2019-04-12 14:48:14+00:00): principalement sur la N43, 
suivant le zoom la voie apparaît en pointillée
mavilleavelo08 (2019-04-12 15:27:11+00:00): La N43 est autorisée à tous les véhicules entre la sortie 11 et l'avenue Charles de Gaulle. Elle est explicitement interdite aux piétons. https://mavilleavelo08.fr/wordpress/2-roues-autorises-sur-la-penetrante-de-charleville/
aytfadc (2019-04-12 15:49:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:access
access=no me semble interdire tous les usagers, mais cela me semble pas très clair!
mavilleavelo08 (2019-04-12 19:15:02+00:00): J'y regarderai plus précisément.
Merci du commentaire
mavilleavelo08 (2019-04-13 07:13:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:access
access=no suivi de foot=yes indique « interdit sauf aux piétons »
aytfadc (2019-04-13 07:31:31+00:00): dans ce cas, foot=no, semble plus correct
gendy54 (2019-04-26 10:00:58+00:00): access=no entraîne un accès interdit à tous (du piéton au gros camion). Donc pour moi c'est à supprimer.
habi (2018-12-10 09:41:35+00:00): Please draw the buildings only once.
tux67 (2018-11-27 16:02:40+00:00): Hallo JacobsGruppe,
diese Änderung war nicht optimal, da redundante Daten bestehen geblieben sind.  Korrektur mit diesem CS erfolgt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64941681
Falls noch mehr Feedback kommt wäre hier ein allbemeiner Platz zur Diskussion:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64623

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64939509
freebeer (2019-01-08 14:20:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 66129931 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me castle in the middle of the road
diegodeg58 (2018-11-27 17:21:49+00:00): ¡Hola! ¿No debería haber quedado como antes con la tilde y el nombre completo?
smaprs (2018-11-30 00:02:14+00:00): Olá patodiez, por favor:  
  
Há ruas que você na verdade "desalinhou", pois estavam certas antes;  
agora passam por cima de edificações:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425820793,  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425820800  
Veja esta casa:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425961273  
  
E estas vias novas também:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/649569790,  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/649569791  
Veja este prédio:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425821952  
  
Você não viu que tinham edificações em baixo?  
 
Por favor, converse com a comunidade.  
E coloque comentário que se possa entender no changset, para que se possa acompanhar. Ok?  
  
De modo geral "todas" as vias de Porto Alegre já haviam sido realinhadas para evitar sobreposição com prédios.  
Você se lembra de mais vias que tenha editado ali? Lhe peço verificar e confirmar. Grato.
smaprs (2018-12-06 10:37:30+00:00): ¿Por qué debo comentar el conjunto de cambios?  
Hay muchas razones...:  
-Por cortesía a sus compañeros editores del mapa, ya que les facilita entender lo que hizo y por qué...  
-Para evitar malos entendidos y que los errores se puedan arreglar rápidamente..., etc,etc.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
smaprs (2018-12-06 10:44:10+00:00): *Ocasionalmente, você pode ser contatado por outros mapeadores questionando sobre suas edições. Por favor, não ignore mensagens de outros. Se outro mapeador investiu tempo para examinar sua edição e contatar-lhe com alguma pergunta, as perguntas merecem uma resposta.* 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:How_We_Map
azakh-world (2018-12-12 01:34:17+00:00): Hello.
When you created a node for the station instead of building, you should have include new station into relations in which removed station participated, otherwise subway gets broken. I've fixed.

Best regards,
Alexey
DaveF (2018-12-12 11:10:21+00:00): Hi Alexey
Could you explain what stop_areas are? What are they for, who uses them?

I've asked, but no one seems to know. Their occurrences are sporadic & many entities tagged that are tagged appear irrelevant to actual rail travel (litter bins, bike racks, shops etc).
There was a post to the Transit forum saying there needs to be a review of the PT schema. Iagree - It's got out of hand.
azakh-world (2018-12-12 11:43:28+00:00): About stop_area relation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:public_transport
Note this feature is approved. Public Transport version2 (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?oldid=625726) is one of active and really used schemes, in particular for visualizing and routing city rapid transport systems. Just for example, look my profile.

In OSM many things are not standardized and have different tagging approaches. Data users must learn live with that and try to not spoil data looking useless for them.
DaveF (2018-12-12 13:46:28+00:00): Hi
Yes. I've read all that previously, & all I see is duplication & confusion. I understand the point of stop_positions, but please provide an example of stop_areas in use.

I believe any pointless data should be removed.
I see 35 edits in your profile. Are you referring to something else?
azakh-world (2018-12-12 15:18:22+00:00): In my profile info there is a link to an application that uses OSM for rendering and routing subways all over the world.
DaveF (2018-12-12 16:47:55+00:00): Sorry, you're going to have to provide me with a link.
Phyks (2018-11-27 22:15:49+00:00): Bonjour,

Quelle est la source utilisée pour ce changement ? Le canal tel que tracé après modification n'a pas l'air visible sur la BD ortho (et le tracé superpose à des zones d'habitation).

Bonne journée,
Phyks (2018-11-27 22:24:26+00:00): En fait, il y a une deuxième relation à proximité pour le canal : https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1249681#map=15/44.1959/4.7379.

Il faudrait probablement fusionner les deux. La modification sur celle-ci ne précise pas que le canal est souterrain à cet endroit, d'où notamment les problèmes de rendu.
PT-53 (2018-11-28 13:31:54+00:00): Hallo  MrWebber,
eswäre schön, wenn Du - wie die meisten Anderen - sinnvolle CS-Kommentare und Quellen-Angaben machen könntest (Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice).
Grüße
Frans S (2018-11-30 10:43:35+00:00): Hi Sheila,  I am reviewing tasks on this project. A remark. Please map your buildings more precise (you tend to map them bigger than they are) and square your buildings with the S key,  Thanks for and keep mapping!
mavl (2018-12-24 17:13:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
viloan (2018-11-27 15:33:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
robert (2018-12-23 13:22:32+00:00): I suspect you managed to remove the whole of Alma Terrace in this edit, breaking the OS Locator match: https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=847382
BCNorwich (2018-12-23 14:56:29+00:00): Hello, my apologies for breaking stuff, that would never have been my intention. 

By my changeset comment I would have thought I only intended to remove a duplicated node (which I've done often).
I have tried reverting that changeset but it only reinserts the duplicate node back into Way: Millgate (44335369).

I've spent a while investigating and find that the day before Alma Terrace was dragged out of position. I reverted that changeset then dragged Alma Terrace back. The terrace was not joined to Millgate. 
It must have been myself that inadvertently deleted the way though I can't think how I made the mistake. I hope you agree it looks OK now.

Regards Bernard.
mueschel (2018-11-28 11:28:38+00:00): Hi,
you added several ways here without any common tag, only tags like Nome or Descrizion that are not used in other places.

Could you check and fix this?
Jan
mueschel (2018-12-20 19:34:31+00:00): I removed these objects because they are not tagged in any meaningful way and I didn't get a reply. Feel free to reupload the data with proper tags.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
ika-chan! (2019-04-27 21:44:53+00:00): In this changeset, you removed a perfectly valid tunnel name that was signed.
Te-Ika (2019-04-29 14:30:14+00:00): My apologies ika-chan,
I was following the general guide lines in the Wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link
That states that links typically do not have names. From Mapillary imagery collected in October, I also was not able to see a name specifically for that link. 
I apologize for deleting it if there was a signed name for that road. Thank you for correcting it.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:39:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
gscholz (2018-11-30 05:50:11+00:00): Hola Juan,
this changeset caused again a duplicate node:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-65.26816&lat=-19.10006&zoom=10&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Saludos Guido
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Svalbard (2018-11-28 06:15:23+00:00): Hallo j1scad, kannst Du kurz erläutern wie Du aus Luftbildern Rückschlüsse auf Firmennamen (Brillux) und Art der gewerblichen Nutzung ziehen kannst. Vielen Dank! Gruß Svalbard
j1scad (2018-12-01 23:08:35+00:00): Hier wäre sogar mapillary eine mögliche Quelle: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.95942598120678&lng=9.497622409844325&z=17&menu=false&focus=photo&pKey=9vwzKEKBYcGwMOu6Je_qUQ
Grüße
Svalbard (2018-12-02 11:39:27+00:00): Hallo j1scad, vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung! Wenn Du Mapillary als Quelle für die Edits benutzt hast, dann nenne es doch einfach als Quelle. Das erspart das Nachfragen. Gruß Svalbard
pfiers (2019-02-12 17:08:34+00:00): Wat betekend "correct ingetekend"? De geometrie van de appartementen rond het Vesaliusplein zijn op GRB data gebaseerd, veel correcter dan dat kan niet. 

Gelukkig ook dat het Vesaliusplein highway=pedestrian heeft, anders zou het plein door https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/649591346 overtekend zijn.

Herbekijk of revert deze changeset aub.
Frans S (2018-11-30 11:36:31+00:00): Hi Sheila, Please take a look on this webpage 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65041155
This shows your initial mappings and the modifications which has been made.
Thanks for your contribution to this project and keep mapping
mueschel (2018-11-28 11:30:21+00:00): Hi,
you imported 5200 nodes with tags like
ele = 115.319000
geoidheight =-19.615000
time 	= 2018-11-25T08:27:23Z

Could you have a look and remove these? Those tags don't look like they should be in OSM.
Kelerei (2019-03-20 09:52:50+00:00): Hello, I noticed while mapping in the area that this changeset deleted both N2 route relations.  I've spent the last few days restoring and reconstructing these relations.  Please take more care in future.
jimstn (2018-12-01 12:01:55+00:00): Hi

You seem to be local, but you've mapped the Billy Mill roundabout again. This roundabout was removed in 2016 (which was why someone had mapped it as a junction) but the aerial imagery may not have been updated.

Are you happy for your changes to be undone?
AmerigoVespa (2018-12-01 14:30:38+00:00): Hi, yes sorry, I got carried away by the aerial. I had made the first fix  #64829075 because there were some missing connections and the navigator (OsmAmd+) had you do funny things. SO I think my first edit of it was ok.
Can't find a way to delete all the second edit...
jimstn (2018-12-01 22:50:29+00:00): No problem. I rolled back your changes to the layout, and you're right, the routing/navigation wouldn't work because the roads at the crossroads crossed without joining. I think I've fixed that.
InsertUser (2018-11-27 19:36:15+00:00): I think your changeset comment might be about a previous edit.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:05:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:27:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:14:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
chnav (2018-11-28 06:17:14+00:00): Пожалуйста не используйте кавычки в названиях. Спасибо.
PT-53 (2019-08-10 05:30:09+00:00): Hallo  sulagaloh,
im OSM-Inspector wird für diese Linie 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/649637711/history
ein Hinwies "ways_without_tags" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.33673&lat=47.57777&zoom=17&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-19 16:16:07+00:00): Hallo sulagaloh,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
b-jazz (2018-11-27 19:45:19+00:00): Hi again Bkissin,

I'd love it if you could stop doing the following style of mapping: https://imgur.com/a/oaR0j1m since it gets tagged by validators like OSM Inspector and I end up going in and cleaning it up. If you can't use multipolygons, at least don't use the same nodes going out of the "island" as you do going in. It's them crossing or overlapping that sets off error flags.
Thanks.
Bkissin (2018-11-27 19:50:18+00:00): Thanks @b-jazz! I appreciate your patience with my issues here. Is there a particular "manual of style" regarding houses near the woods like this situation? Should I just make a clean polygon and add the buildings later? I'll have to try to do more work around multipolygons to try and "cut out" bare areas in existing forest polygons.
b-jazz (2018-11-27 20:02:50+00:00): I'm pretty sure that the correct, manual of style way is to use an inner polygon for the non wood types of the outer polygon. If that is too difficult with the given tools, I'd venture to guess that making the whole area a forest and then adding some buildings inside the forest would be acceptable and wouldn't trigger any errors.
Do you need help learning how to create multipolygons, or is there another issue that makes them onerous?