piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Strubbl (2021-04-17 15:44:08+00:00): Dürfen auf diesen beiden Wegen, die du hier geändert hast, wirklich Kraftfahrzeuge aller Art, dazu gehören LKW, PKW, Motorräder, Traktoren, fahren? Und was bedeutet designated in diesem Fall? 

Welches Schild steht hier für diese Wege?
Siehe: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:motor%20vehicle?uselang=de
Strubbl (2021-04-17 15:52:40+00:00): Ich frage das auch auch im Forum nach, weil es mir sehr unbekannt erscheint:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=826676

Dort kannst du dich mit deinem OSM-Benutzernamen einloggen und mitdiskutieren. Die ersten 3 Benutzerbeiträge im Forum müssen manuell freigeschaltet werden wegen Spamschutz. Es dauert also einen kleinen Moment bis dein Beitrag erscheint.
user_5359 (2021-04-17 04:20:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area.
Marc_ch (2021-04-17 12:08:56+00:00): Hello,
I fail to understand what are you doing.
the comment suggests that you have imported a lot of "table tennis tables" from SwissImage by Swisstopo or from "SwissName3D
but your changeset deletes a lot of them, so it's incomprehensible
can you explain ?
Regards,
Marc
Marc_ch (2021-04-17 12:19:23+00:00): for ex I fail to understand why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921511850 near https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/46.52044/6.61787 is delete. SwissImage show a table tennis
Marc_ch (2021-04-17 12:27:43+00:00): but also
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674533087
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921511851
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921511852
landscapemapper (2021-04-17 14:25:26+00:00): Hi. Thanks for asking. I did not delete any tables (at all), but I replaced the closed ways with nodes. The main intention there was to homogenize at least the Swiss TTT dataset. Right now we have about 3720 tables mapped as nodes and 280 as closed ways. I am aware that this action is questionable as it overrules a fellows decision. As a relative newbie I am absolutely open to critics and arguments restraining me from doing that from now on.
regards.
landscapemapper (2021-04-17 16:35:49+00:00): I see. I deleted the former contributors credit. My bad.
SimonPoole (2021-04-18 14:11:15+00:00): Note there is no need to homogenize the data set in this way as it is trivial to generate centroids from table outlines if they are mapped in that way (overpass api supports this directly).
landscapemapper (2021-04-18 16:12:46+00:00): Ok. Got it.
Juampayo Escorpio (2021-04-18 23:35:02+00:00): Una parte de la calle Senador Estébanez quedó alterada al realizar estos cambios. Cuando intento hacer la corrección, me aparece un ícono de prohibición que me lo impide.
RicoElectrico (2021-04-17 11:15:49+00:00): Hi, I do not think it's correct. Did you verify it with imagery? This is not highway=platform - it's just  a traffic island fot a two-stage crossing with a bit of grass. Original tagging could probably be improved, but new one is not what the object is.
Dawid2849 (2021-04-17 11:41:46+00:00): I tried to fix it, tell me if I did something wrong.
willisturm (2021-04-17 16:41:01+00:00): Hi Dawid,
that is perfect. Thank you
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-11-15 12:37:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2936380 - are you sure that there is bus platform there?

Are you sure that this edit corrects anything?
user_2066394 (2021-04-16 22:03:58+00:00): Passt surface=* ?
map per (2021-04-17 05:12:48+00:00): Der Teil https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444996326 ist auf jeden Fall asphaltiert. Beim Rest weiß ich es nicht so genau
impiaaa (2021-04-21 18:22:39+00:00): Please don't draw an area and copy duplicate information to the area. Instead, merge the existing point to the area. I've fixed it in changeset 103359049
PamDOB (2021-05-05 00:30:45+00:00): Sorry. I will make sure that I merge.
joost schouppe (2021-09-05 09:01:20+00:00): Hoi Johwie,
Een lokale specialist zegt me dat deze "bergtop" niet echt bestaat, en ook niet 80 meter hoog is. Wat is je bron hiervoor?
JhowieNitnek (2021-09-05 12:56:32+00:00): Oei sorry ik weet niet meer waar ik deze info vandaan heb
joost schouppe (2021-09-06 08:54:48+00:00): Dan zal ik hem maar verwijderen
jleedev (2021-04-16 15:51:28+00:00): service=parking_aisle seems appropriate for those roads, and that sure looks unpaved in the imagery -- if you have a source that says otherwise please include it.
kylebakerpa05 (2021-04-16 16:05:05+00:00): i'm pretty sure it's been paved now that i've been there.
jleedev (2021-04-16 15:42:13+00:00): Elevation should be given in meters, not feet.
kylebakerpa05 (2021-04-16 16:05:21+00:00): if you know it, can you fix it then.
portalaventura (2021-04-16 15:31:21+00:00): Boas-vindas Kinhas, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
arvdk (2021-08-23 05:40:57+00:00): Hoi Jeroen, in deze changeset tag je individuele huizen en schuurtjes als building=terrace. Is dat per ongeluk? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dterrace
Jeroen van Omme (2021-08-23 05:50:28+00:00): Dit is denk ik een misverstand bij het gebruik van de StreetComplete-app.
Is alweer 4 maanden geleden, dus helemaal zeker ben ik niet, maar ik vermoed da ik heb aan willen geven dat het rijtjeshuizen betreft.
czubi (2021-04-17 08:57:20+00:00): Habe mir mal erlaubt die 2 Adressen zu korr. weil es sonst zu Fehlermeldungen kommt. Die eine war doppelt (den Adressnode auf St. Crucis gibt es schon) und bei der anderen war city=Ohrdruf OT Wölfis falsch. OT Wölfis wird schon über addr:suburb=Wölfis abgebildet und city=Ohrdruf muss mit der umschließenden boundary übereinstimmen (daher OT Wölfis gelöscht)
Supaplex (2021-04-17 12:06:13+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
StefanHRT (2021-04-16 16:09:33+00:00): Da gibt es laut CyclOSM noch einige Wege mit designated. Die Frage ist ob die Wege überhaupt alle für den Radverkehr freigegeben sind (Stichwort Geschützte Grünanlage und extra ausgewiesene Wege für den Radverkehr) ;)
CuriousAboutPNR (2021-05-05 13:57:54+00:00): Hello,

Is the restoration of the Metro North Commuter Line still ongoing?

Until now, there are no updates from PNR about the planned extension of that railway line to Valenzuela City. I'm wondering if they already scrapped that plan.
McMurd0Station (2021-05-06 04:24:43+00:00): Hi CuriousAboutPNR, Thank you for reaching out. Unfortunately, I’m not aware of future plans for this railway line and I was just fixing a "Crossing highway/railway” validation error by adding the level_crossing tag.
sutsisatsi (2021-04-16 15:54:03+00:00): Siirretty pyöräilyreitit laillisesti ajoradalle Sotkatiellä, parsittu kasaan puuttuvia pätkiä Lauttasaaressa. Siirretty Salmisaaressa poikkeusreitille We Land-työmaan kohdalla.
Rassilon (2021-04-16 20:48:38+00:00): Hull MA - Aligned Crescent Beach; Green Hill Rock (I accidentally uploaded before adding comment)
Nonexhudlix (2021-04-16 21:13:38+00:00): Der Obernühlenweg zwischen Ärztehaus und The-heiuß wurde fälschlicherweise gelöscht.
blackboxlogic (2021-04-19 16:57:59+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding this building. I added address nodes as placeholders for buildings. When you add a building, please move the address tags from the node to the building, then deleting the address node so it isn't redundant. Regarding: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7231419605
Please ask if you have questions. -Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103070879
portalaventura (2021-04-16 16:12:54+00:00): Boas-vindas LEO TATSCH, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse (2023-07-16 10:38:37+00:00): Should https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/252673627/history perhaps be disused:highway=bus_stop if buses no longer stop there?
CjMalone (2023-07-19 09:01:35+00:00): I'm unsure if Minibus-plus still use this stop, but Southern Vectis definitely don't.

Minibus-plus seems to be much more informal, and would stop anywhere. Bus stop or not.
rms_TSCH (2021-04-16 16:29:17+00:00): Haltestelle Heiligkreuz, Schule erstellt. Neuer Straßenname Rudolf-Geiss-Weg.
portalaventura (2021-04-16 16:30:30+00:00): Boas-vindas Jesse Santos, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
Mordechai23 (2022-02-07 17:44:46+00:00): dodajesz tracki w miastach
Palolo (2021-04-16 17:26:37+00:00): Thank you for your help in mapping Tanzania. Please look at the OSM materials to learn how to map buildings accurately. Use the q key to make square corners on the buildings.  Thanks
eggie (2021-04-16 17:02:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 
Elk begin is moeilijk.  
Tip: Kijk goed naar de waarschuwingen die je krijgt.
	Douglashout voetpad heeft net geen verbinding met de Loper.
warnings:almost_junction:highway-highway
Kijk je nog even?


MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
FWessels (2021-04-16 22:51:44+00:00): Als het goed is gefixed nu
portalaventura (2021-04-16 16:49:37+00:00): Boas-vindas WolmerJr_BRA, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2021-04-16 17:21:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Thierry1030 (2021-08-18 17:27:59+00:00): Dag Erik,
Afgaand op uw comment mogen fietsers hier in de twee richtingen rijden, terwijl auto's maar in 1 richting mogen rijden.
Dat dient als volgt getagd te worden:
oneway=yes
oneway:bicycle=no

verder dient ook een waarde ingevuld te worden bij highway. Hier lijkt me highway=residential (dit is een woonstraat) aangewezen ...
Jakka (2021-08-18 18:30:46+00:00): Ik stel vast Erik bovenop de corect bestaande weg een nieuwe heeft opgeplakt met de foute info https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79394254#map=18/51.22348/4.92018&layers=N
enkel oneway:bicycle=no ontbreekt. Graag een verbetering Erik. Hulp nodig laat het snem weten dan doen we het voor jou...deze bewerking verhindert goede werking van app.....
Dino Michelini (2021-04-18 08:45:43+00:00): in accordo con quanto previsto nella wiki di OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments) sarebbe opportuno lascire un commento esplicativo delle modifiche fatte. Grazie
Wulf4096 (2021-10-03 10:49:31+00:00): Hallo,
hab die Änderung zurückgesetzt. Radfahren ist auf der Robert-Schuman-Brücke erlaubt, da nicht verboten.
eggie (2021-04-16 17:34:14+00:00): Top!
portalaventura (2021-04-16 17:33:00+00:00): Boas-vindas Vick Doceria, parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição ao OpenStreetMap!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo, e em https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato canais de interação com a comunidade de brasileira.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
Warin61 (2021-05-05 10:47:08+00:00): Reverted.

Restore 3 buildings - still there according to the referred imagery. And undo combining things.
MxxCon (2021-04-16 18:34:22+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what suggestion are you talking about that updated these tags?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103074221
JuliaW323 (2021-04-16 20:26:47+00:00): Hi, OpenStreetMap suggested to upgrade the tags for power station grounds.
Glassman (2021-04-17 00:03:40+00:00): #TIP: You can also add a node on the pier where the gate is located to further indicate that no one is allowed beyond the gate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103074263
Tolstoi21 (2021-04-19 08:45:48+00:00): Merikannon tietä sivuavalla pyörätiellä on kaksi kaistaa pyörälle, eli saa pyöräillä molempiin suuntiin. Merikannintielle siis syytä laittaa use_sidepath -tagi.
sutsisatsi (2021-04-19 10:17:11+00:00): Kiitos huomiosta, mutta 1.6.2020 voimaan tulleen tieliikennelaissa sanotaan, että jos pyörätie ei kulje kulkusuuntaan oikealla puolella niin pyörällä saa oman harkintansa mukaan kulkea myös ajoradalla. ”Jos pyörätie on kulkusuuntaasi nähden tien vasemmalla puolella, voit ajaa myös ajoradalla tai pientareella, jos se on turvallisempaa.”

Käytännössähän pyörätiellä on yleensä turvallisempaa kulkea mutta tämä on nykyään tällaisessa tilanteessa pyöräilijän päätettävissä. Pyörätiellä kulkeminen on siis ”optional”.
sutsisatsi (2021-04-19 10:18:38+00:00): * voimaan tullessa tieliikennelaissa
sutsisatsi (2021-04-19 10:19:18+00:00): Äh! *tulleessa
Tolstoi21 (2021-04-19 10:33:57+00:00): Hei, suurkiitokset selvennyksestä! Tämä kohta oli jäänyt itseltäni uudesta lainkohdasta muistamatta, vaikka aktiivisesti pyöräilenkin. Täytyy tänään polkea kotimatkalla Merikannontien kautta. Olin ihan muistavinani, että siinä on Pohjoisen Hesperiankadun ja Kesäkadun välisellä osuudella kaksi kaistaa pyöräilijöille, mutta voi olla, että muistan väärin. Kiitos muuten myös korjauksistasi Sotkatien varrella. Taitaa tosiaan olla, että Sotkatien varrella rannassa kulkeva osuus on vain jalankulkijoille. Pitää käydä itsekin katsomassa (ja myöhemmin merkkaamassa karttaankin) päivitetyt liikennemerkit tuolla Sotkatiellä.
sutsisatsi (2021-04-19 10:47:23+00:00): Juu Merikannontiellä taitaa olla vain yksi yhteinen kaista pyörille, ja toinen puolikas jalankulkijoille. Ymmärtäisin niin, että pyörätien käyttö on "optional" vaikka pyörätie olisikin jaettu kahtia eri suuntaan kulkeville, tärkein pointti on siis siinä onko pyörätie kulkusuuntaan nähden oikealla puolella. Itsekin kyllä lähtökohtaisesti kuljen pyörätietä jos sellainen löytyy. :)
Dino Michelini (2021-04-17 16:25:48+00:00): Ciao, sarebbe opportuno lasciare un commento ai changeset. Grazie
Sebastian St (2021-04-16 17:53:34+00:00): So, ich hoffe mal, dass ich dieses Mal keine Relationen kaputt gemacht habe, denn diesmal habe ich alle Linien und Haltestellen in der richtigen Reihenfolge angeordnet.
Bert Araali (2021-05-01 03:42:54+00:00): Hello Jean-Marc, what is the intend of this super-relation ? It conflicts with the local situation on the ground, local mapping practices and I fear it is going to increase the already heated land conflicts in our Capital.  Kampla, neither any other Ugandan city is a unified residential zone.  We are working for years to map the landuse in the city as neutral as possible, on a detailed, often micro scale. It's like you want to map all of Paris and part of it's suburbs as one huge residential zone. Which is obviously not the case.  This relation is going to interfere with all projects and data we offer to various data consumers, overlaps and duplicates already intensively mapped landuse and goes against the practices how the local community maps.  So for now, I removed the landuse=residential tag from this relation and will be happy to assist in any philosophy or intend to find appropriate tags for the large job you have done, with the consent of the local community of course.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-05-01 12:30:44+00:00): You mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12571016 ? This is standard practice everywhere - look at Conakry here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=12/9.6143/-13.5630 - or anywhere else really. Yes, it is the norm in Paris too: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1988489, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10967048 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10837210 for example. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential says: "The landuse tag is mostly used for larger areas and not at parcel granularity". It represents the extent of the agglomeration. Inside, there is room for detail such as place=neighborhood, landuse=industrial etc. Of course More granularity would be even better, and this could be broken down to smaller pieces - but mapping the agglomeration is the standard Openstreetmap way to start that process.
Bert Araali (2021-05-01 13:34:09+00:00): Yes, I do mean https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12571016. You focus on single phrases in a guideline. The wiki is a guideline, not a rule or necessarily reflecting "common use" of OSM. Landuse is used differently across the world, in some countries on a macro scale, in some on a mirco, as you might say on a plot by plot basis if it makes sense. You should follow the local practices and contact the local community before undertaking such large edits.  Local guidelines are developed on an ongoing basis for this purpose and the majority of the countries worldwide does not implement landuse on this scale. The examples you refer to are common use outside of Uganda, even outside of Africa, and at least in UG considered as not favourable for our local needs and reality.  The wiki, besides the isolated sentence you refer to says also "The extent of the area should mark the boundary of known residential use, not the extent of the whole town or village."  What you are mapping is not just the extend of our Capital, Kampala, but even trying to include areas outside the capital district boundaries, into Wakiso district, which neither is managed, belongs too or managed in the same way as the capital.  Kampala, meaning the district as it is managed by the city authority KCCA,  has so far 588 residential areas mapped, Wakiso district 10912 ! The whole Kampala district could be considered a residential area if I try to follow your reasoning and mapping, we already have a nice administrative boundary relation for that. Your relation tries to overrule this ? Besides this, it is absolutely wrong, locally to align landuse=residential with the boundaries of natural features like wetlands. Encroaching of wetlands is a common detrimental practice in UG. Wetlands are mapped according to the situation on the ground, which in many cases cannot be determined from satellite imagery.  All wetlands are community, government owned land.  This situation changes rapidly.  So we map the encorachers on a neutral basis, adding the buildings and the landuse on an individual basis within the wetlands.  So they overlap with the wetlands.  Landuse overlaps with natural (or landcover as you like) allowing data consumers to analyse the extend of the mispractices but also retaining a neutral position as a mapper.  People are getting killed because of this practice.  Another major reason why in UG we don't map landuse on the scale which might be favourable in Western countries.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-05-01 14:31:24+00:00): The logic I was following is the mapping of the built-up area of the agglomeration, so independently of administrative boundaries (which I usually filter out in JOSM - because I have no information about them, so I don't touch them). Aligning residential areas with administrative boundaries is a possibility - albeit a rare practice, but they are usually independent because, contrary to the residential areas, the administrative boundaries are not directly observable and land uses are usually not aligned with them. Agglomerations typically extend well beyond official city limits and the contrary exists too when only part of an administrative circumscription is built up.

The wetlands are a different story. I excluded them from that relation because I observed on orbital imagery that in Kampala they almost always correspond to the boundary of built-up areas - and you explained why this is the most common case. But of course residential areas encroaching on wetlands are a common occurrence - for example in the last twenty years Dakar has had terrible problems with that, although the situation is improving. So, yes - while aligning landuse=residential with wetland boundaries was a practical expedient for a first approach to mapping Kampala's urban area, it is by no means the last word and finer description is superior... But this has to start somewhere and the lack of a landuse=residential to encompass Kampala's built up extent is troubling.
Bert Araali (2021-05-02 13:17:53+00:00): I wouldn't call the lack of landuse tagging in Kampala and UG at large troubling. It's a next step in establishing more details on base maps, the local community with the help of other OSM users and groups is working hard to improve it. Groups include the UN mappers, HOTOSM, youthmappers and a local Workgroup to document the local mapping and tagging practices, make appropriate field checks if in doubt.  This with support and grants from the OSMF and other donors. Super-relations are hard if not impossible to maintain on the long term by the average user, so the local community decided to avoid them as we have very bad experience like with f.i. Lake Victoria. The reason why this relation is troublesome is primarily the fact that it is overwriting thousands of already mapped landuses in the area and does not comply with the good mapping guidelines, as I said before, landuse should not be used to map areas as big as an "agglomerate". Mass or edits with a large impact like this one should always be made in consensus with the local community. So did you contact the local community, have consensus ?