piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
natuur_POV (2021-09-13 13:56:36+00:00): Paden die niet binnen de gewenste toegankelijkheid zitten worden niet gecontroleerd op veiligheid. Er is gevaar voor vallend dood hout. Vooral bij harde wind, regenweer of sneeuwval.
joost schouppe (2021-09-13 14:51:55+00:00): Verbod op gebruik is geen argument om ze te deleten , zoals uitgelegd op de gelinkte pagina's
fabiotofy (2021-09-09 14:27:27+00:00): Ciao, nel campo civico si può mettere solo un numero. O il 30 o il 32. Se vi sono due civici l'elemento puntuale va duplicato
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110799412
fabiotofy (2021-09-16 06:08:29+00:00): Corrego io. Un saluto
StefanHRT (2021-09-06 12:24:17+00:00): Hallo mardiz, schau Dir mal bitte das noch einmal genauer an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390222688 ;) VG
Rainero (2021-09-10 17:45:30+00:00): Hallo Haengematte,

willkommen bei OSM und danke für die erste Änderung.
Das Objekt zieht nicht von selbst an den neuen Ort, wenn die Adresse geändert wird. 
Allerdings ist das Verschieben über größere Strecken mit dem iD-Editor im Browser nicht so einfach. Daher spiele ich mal das Heinzelmännchen und verschiebe die Einrichtung. 

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
Haengematte (2021-09-14 08:17:11+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
vielen Dank fürs Heinzelmännchen-Spielen!
Beste Grüße
Peter
fndoder (2021-09-06 12:32:24+00:00): Точка Татнефтепродукта не удалена, а просто смещена в сторону (вероятно, случайно).
См. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4491718051/history
Её можно просто передвинуть обратно.

В остальном в пакете правок всё хорошо.
pantufla (2023-09-07 21:25:05+00:00): Hola Wilmer, aquí nos prononen La Palmita: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9066840695/history

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3875797#map=17/8.76895/-71.45303
flohoff (2021-09-06 15:40:57+00:00): Moin Frank,

nur weil ich gerade gesehen haben zufällig - barrier=gate auf der ganzen zufahrt? Das ist doch bestimmt falsch ;)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980109954
Woazboat (2021-10-29 21:57:05+00:00): Hi, du hast hier in diesem Changeset ein paar public transport platforms verändert und die Tags von der platform node auf einen platform way verschoben (z.b. hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4123992755 -> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419250569), jedoch leider ohne die dazugehörigen public transport route relations (z.b. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/27176) zu ändern sodass sie die neuen platforms verwenden. (Habs inzwischen schon wieder gefixt)

lg, Woazboat


PS: Das OSM Inspector Tool kann beim arbeiten mit public transport routes recht hilfreich sein:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=15.43348&lat=47.05706&zoom=17&overlays=ptv2_routes_,ptv2_routes_valid,ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_,ptv2_error_ways,ptv2_error_nodes
felipeeugenio (2021-09-06 18:11:08+00:00): Hola. Se dibuja la base del edificio. no el techo. para eso hay otros tags.
building es la estructura. saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110802069
Carto'Cité (2022-01-07 14:01:20+00:00): Bonjour Romy G,
Merci pour l'ajout de ce chemin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980114918
J'ai corrigé car il s'agit d'un voie verte avec la signalétique qui va bien. N'hésite pas à me dire si tu as observé autre chose :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Romy G (2022-01-07 14:40:53+00:00): En effet petite coquille de mon côté sur la nature de l'aménagement cyclable...
Carto'Cité (2022-01-07 17:21:27+00:00): Merci pour ton retour :)
N'hésite pas à me solliciter pour échanger sur tes activités ; ça m'intéresse beaucoup.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Dodko (2021-09-12 09:55:22+00:00): Nie je potrebné pridávať značku foot=yes to automaticky vyplýva z toho, že je to poľná cesta highway=track tak tam môžu aj chodci.
Tak ako na na bežnú ulicu v obci sa nepridáva, že tam môže ísť cyklista aj chodec.
◪ Jarv (2021-09-06 22:57:22+00:00): This isn't an unclassified road. Its a track, at most a service road
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110804928
Vika_Nosovich (2021-09-07 06:24:00+00:00): Dear Thomas Jarvis, thank you for your comment. Indeed I didn't correctly select the class of the road. I have already corrected the map
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110834204#map=19/53.12881/-0.67572
Thank you for your interest and contribution to the common cause.
iWowik (2021-09-07 15:06:44+00:00): День добрый!
Выполняйте, пожалуйста, принятое соглашение о наименовании дорог
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Пример ваших ошибок:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980134339/history

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки за вами исправлять или откатывать
Yourez (2021-09-07 16:33:26+00:00): Добрый день! 
Благодарю! Исправлю.
Josef73 (2023-05-13 05:00:43+00:00): Hello, can you please check the value of the tag opening_hours. It has to be in English. Please look here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Thanks
RicoElectrico (2021-09-06 22:30:20+00:00): Wycofałem, bo bukmacher w środku lasu to musiała być pomyłka.
pkoby (2021-09-06 16:33:24+00:00): Any chance we can see a bit more detail/variety in your changeset comments? I'm noticing a lot more than cosmetic changes in some of your edits. Thanks!
DUGA (2021-09-07 04:22:52+00:00): Yes they are really cosmetic. 

What I’ve done is adding the full name of the garage and drop TIGER tags of 2 streets after aligning them.
DressyPear4 (2021-09-06 23:50:40+00:00): Olá, considere uma pista só se for mão única, deve ser duas se o tráfego for em ambos os sentidos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110806876
geo-d (2021-09-06 14:32:11+00:00): Erläuterung zum Änderungssatz muss richtig heißen: Hausnummern korrekt gereiht
ToniE (2021-09-06 17:14:36+00:00): Und mein Mist ist 8 Jahre nicht aufgefallen!?
zstadler (2021-09-07 08:54:21+00:00): This changeset actually reverts changeset 97218168
user_11332999 (2021-09-20 09:35:41+00:00): @zstadler: Why did you delete with this changeset Arabic names (e.g. in node 278473683 and relation 1379484)? And these name deletions are not related with a reversal of changeset 97218168. This is vandalism.
zstadler (2021-09-20 13:50:17+00:00): Dear Franswa,

I assume you have looked at the source of this changeset - https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=834783#p834783
I would therefore appreciate some caution before calling this revert "vandalism".

To your points:

According to 
http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=278473683
The Arabic name for node 278473683 was introduced in changeset 97218168 and was therefore included in the revert.

Similarly for http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=1379484

Reverting the 3 changesets was massive task. It was difficult enough to resolve the conflicts that were created since the edits were made. Performing selective reverts was not a practical option.

Best regards,
zstadler
ZeLonewolf (2021-09-06 18:49:48+00:00): Hello,

This appears to be an attempt to circumvent the blocks listed below with new user accounts and new referral domains. This type of behavior will not be tolerated by the US mapping community, and we will swiftly revert and report future attempts to bypass community standards of behavior. Please stop spamming referral links. It is a waste of everyone's time including yours.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5316
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5317
aweech (2021-09-06 16:00:36+00:00): Hi,
These look like perfectly valid paths to me. Is it against park rules to stray from marked paths in the Needles?
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:25:18+00:00): Bzdura, tam nie ma mostu.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:26:47+00:00): Wandalizm, wycofane.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:27:25+00:00): Tu nie ma mostu.
M_Gaugg (2021-09-06 19:24:59+00:00): Super, vielen Dank für diesen tollen Beitrag.
abakus_uploader (2021-09-06 22:31:18+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
bleedbogema (2021-09-07 19:21:45+00:00): this is not a highway. It is going to be a road to a new school
deepikja (2021-09-08 17:31:17+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for your comment. Existing roads are incomplete, I have checked our internal imageries (03/2021) and added construction tag to the road. Since you confirmed road exist, we have made it complete. Thanks for the feedback, happy to learn from you. 
Regards,
Deepikja
Tomas Straupis (2021-09-06 17:56:25+00:00): Hello. This address already existed. We've done full import of Lithuanian addresses 6-10 months ago.
Mashin (2021-09-06 21:42:53+00:00): Hi Sphilbrick,
thanks for adding tons of information. 

Just a small thing, the name= tag is reserved for an actual name of the object and descriptive information is placed into separate tags.
e.g. 
Private access => access=private

Information about trail routes is a bit more complicated, because it is stored inside relations
Blue Trail => color=blue
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12181034
Gazer75 (2021-10-15 12:52:01+00:00): Please do not mess with the power lines if you don't know what you're doing. This 132kV line is new and have no connection to the 22kV distribution network below it. The towers are placed based on new Aviation obstacle data available as a layer in editor.
Edelsalami (2021-10-15 13:06:01+00:00): And a good day to you as well. A simple mistake, that is. It looked like a reasonable connection at that time. Thanks for correcting it.
Gazer75 (2021-10-15 13:12:29+00:00): Sorry if I came on a bit direct. Had to deal with random people breaking the power grid over the years. To be honest if you think connecting a 132kV line to a 22kV tower/pole sounds reasonable, then you don't know what you're doing ;) There is a big difference in size on towers/poles between those voltage levels.
Edelsalami (2021-10-15 13:24:46+00:00): No worries. Yeah, that's true. But I can't see any poles of the high voltage line on the imagery, it's just so blurry... so there's that ;) I'll be more careful in the future.
Gazer75 (2021-10-15 13:36:09+00:00): Norway Orthophoto imagery should not be blurry. But they can be a few years old in some cases. The low res images are 0.25m refreshed every 5 years. Higher res is 0.1m or better and is more random. Current image for this area is from 2018, and the line was completed in 2019/20 I believe.

You can actually check age by going to norgeibilder.no There is a small globe icon top right which can change UI to English.
Gazer75 (2021-10-15 13:44:42+00:00): A tip, there are another two 132k lines just north of that spot which would show typical H tower size for this voltage level.

I use multiple sources/layers available to keep lines up to date. Imagery, Karverket DOM, Aviation obstacle and NVE data. Unfortunately the DOM and DTM layers don't work in iD as they haven't updated the wms links.

If you have any questions just ask. I've been mapping lines above the 22kV distribution gird over the past few years, and trying to keep it as up to date as possible.
BCNorwich (2021-09-06 18:34:34+00:00): Hi, I've removed the bridge tag from the path.

Regards Bernard.
maraf24 (2021-09-09 17:24:28+00:00): Wycofane.
BCNorwich (2021-09-06 18:36:31+00:00): Hi, I removed the name=driveway tag.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-09-06 18:39:45+00:00): Hi, I removed the residential area because it's inside of an existing residential area making duplication.

Regards Bernard.
Tyndare (2021-09-20 14:24:33+00:00): Bonjour, bienvenu sur OpenStreetMap.
Vos modifications posent qq problèmes: vous avez par exemple supprimé un restaurant qui existe toujours (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2460954133/history) ou rajouté une rue qui existait déjà avec un mauvais nom (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980175117/history)
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:11:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
woodpeck_repair (2022-01-17 18:11:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115987058, 116256242, 116201510, 116088865, 115961205, 115909054, 116246495, 116169440, 115907273, 116190493, 116097969, 116215378, 115858878, 116102205, 116089702, 115892693, 116209638, 115858095, 116169906, 115945264, 115997653, 116173151, 116203612, 116159666, 115917562, 116211414, 115940656, 115999487, 116182419, 116231762, 116194866, 115982719, 116163488, 116115731, 115901956, 116100067, 116016301, 116132274, 116138293, 115861170, 115954008, 116036573, 116130633, 115938707, 116111612, 115860184, 116166788, 115891057, 116220349, 116073948, 116076098, 116058603, 115932463, 115854450, 115900071, 116148640, 116048017, 116241969, 116224272, 116171543, 115957131, 116022990, 116080033, 116056361, 115947919, 116233436, 115857162, 115877026, 115850650, 116004641, 116177461, 115929128, 116249159, 116113713, 115896313, 116205510, 115883321, 115915525, 116251678, 115943146, 115866802, 116129806, 116174374, 116192503, 116136374, 116196233, 116086007, 116161599, 115984534, 115950322, 116239965, 116213416, 116142949, 116001023, 115848475, 116133876, 115989603, 116168898, 115894172, 115925419, 116258652, 115927631, 116071930, 115913517, 116086956, 115868585, 115952312, 116179230, 116126682, 116202690, 115958750, 115955551, 116129122, 116009704, 115887413, 116078274, 115920862, 115863779, 115967683, 116200009, 115975730, 115933567, 116094069, 115926630, 115895376, 115899448, 116119946, 116084875, 116092164, 116261057, 116063166, 116150818, 115928494, 116046074, 116232654, 115929587, 116007937, 115963744, 116204711, 115995802, 115969455, 115870684, 115930466, 116198840, 116124815, 116265983, 116031891, 115903472, 116038451, 115881101, 116165161, 116170468, 115889260, 115922240, 116122375, 116004006, 116045119, 115879107, 115963129, 116087727, 115898028, 116180648, 115960252, 115875029, 116049224, 116132972, 115971511, 115900840, 116234692, 116175765, 115930042, 116088329, 116096072, 116020795, 116168000, 115852688, 115966038, 116006521, 115897064, 116235490, 116024970, 116090839, 115862283, 116060792, 116203152, 115930961, 116207912, 115873052, 116227766, 116229157, 116052340, 115978064, 115964730, 116040401, 116109235, 115991758, 116141089, 115897597, 116155392, 116003243, 116034560, 116002436, 116236672, 116054351, 116005404, 116029310, 115898888, 116188418, 116170992, 115855971, 116200856, 116172218, 116144870, 115935050, 116222506, 116184294, 116230562, 116217637, 115936711, 116186305, 115923725, 116244174, 116157650, 116104506, 116117821, 116081696, 115911369, 116050711, 116131458, 115859460, 116206601, 115973628, 116027067, 116234060, 116067530, 115961954, 116226056, 116018438, 116069855, 116065512, 116202141, 116083456, 116046717, 116146732, 116128090, 115905278, 116197629, 116011710, 115931594, 116044045, 115865164, 116106711, 116042591, 116153122, 115885353, 116204137, 116254060, 116047266, 115994107, 115962544, 116134926, 115919393, 116238162, 115898455, 116263538, 115980503, 116013913 where the changeset comment is: revert an undiscussed and buggy building import in (mainly) Baghdad
Sandal man (2021-09-08 12:45:46+00:00): Hallo, dort ist bereits eine highway=track vorhanden, daher ist es nicht korrekt, der Beziehung einen "Highway= Service" zu geben.
Beachten Sie auch die 23 Fehler, die Sie editiert haben!
Ich habe es zurückgedreht.

Grüße Jan 

warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	23
ovruni (2021-09-06 22:27:40+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado nombres en minúsculas, la recomendación en OSM es seguir el uso mixto donde la primera letra de cada palabra es en mayúsculas y el resto en minúsculas. [0]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may.C3.BAsculas
olo81 (2021-10-05 17:39:31+00:00): dlaczego access=private ?
chyba wkradł się błąd 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115591091/history
olo81 (2021-10-05 17:41:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:access=private?uselang=pl
olo81 (2021-10-05 18:54:48+00:00): AA, widzę że całkiem typ drogi zmieniony.  W takim wypadku wydaje się być ok.
emvee (2023-07-09 12:44:32+00:00): I did further update the disused camping, see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=138295256 (enable relations)
John Murrell (2021-09-06 17:12:25+00:00): It is not this building that is wrong it is 'Seven Sisters Park' but this does not appear to be editable to correct the |County to East Sussex
drkt (2021-09-06 20:05:14+00:00): If this is a continuation of your crusade against highway=footway I commented on in cs 110784465, then please acknowledge my comment instead of doing this. This isn't solving the issue. This is not a path, it's a footway and that's not where that barrier is. Please respond. let's discuss this. I don't want to involve the DWG, it's a hassle.
redd (2023-01-15 12:08:40+00:00): Hallo Giftzwerg,
zu dem von dir bearbeiteten Ergo Büro in Böblingen gibt es einen Hinweis. Könntest du dir das bitte mal ansehen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3383962

vielen Dank,
reddd
AlexMcB (2021-09-06 18:04:27+00:00): unsure whether or not to mark the path as private or remove compleatly, access to it from the pub is blocked by a fence and road-side has a locked gate
maraf24 (2021-09-20 12:41:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/980194508
charl3s (2021-09-20 15:15:44+00:00): Gdzieś trafił się się budynek wyburzony. Wiem, mój błłąd. Sprawdzam każdy budynek i ten pewnie uznałem, za budynek w budowie. Poświęcanie czasu na sprawdzanie archiwalnych zdjęć lotniczych jest bezsensem. W tym samym czasie można narysować kilka budynków, co uważam za pożyteczniejsze. Na wsiach jestem bardziej wyluzowany do importu, niż w dynamicznych dużych miastach.
maraf24 (2021-09-20 19:57:05+00:00): "Sprawdzam każdy budynek i ten pewnie uznałem, za budynek w budowie."

To dane z BDOT a nie integracji, więc zasadniczo starawe. Większość budynków w budowie, jakie w BDOT  widziałem, to były budowy zawieszone, czyli trwające latami.
Sprawdzanie starych orto nigdzie nie zalecam. Po prostu wystarczy nie importować tego, czego nie widać.
RicoElectrico (2021-09-06 19:00:11+00:00): Zmiana, prócz adresu, który zgadza się z urzędowymi danymi, wycofana, wygląda podejrzanie i nie można jej zweryfikować.
ich-ich-ich-ich-ich-ich (2021-10-13 13:45:04+00:00): Hi!

Danke für den Tag access=discouraged . Ich glaube allerdings, dass stattdessen informal=yes der bessere Tag ist, da objektiver. Es gibt keine Schilder, die von der Benutzung des Weges abraten, deswegen ist access=discouraged meiner Meinung nach nicht überprüfbar.

---
I believe the correct tag would be informal=yes instead of access=discouraged since the latter is not objectively verifiable.
ich-ich-ich-ich-ich-ich (2021-10-13 13:45:49+00:00): Das ganze ist allerdings hinfällig, wenn der path ohnehin gelöscht wird... :-)
mangerlahn (2021-10-19 06:46:23+00:00): Ich bin mir da leider auch unsicher. Ich habe den Tag hinzugefügt, weil ich vermeiden wollte, dass der aktuelle Weg in Navigationen verwendet wird. Gerade  ist der Weg nicht im Ansatz barrierefrei und der "Umweg" würde parallel zum Bahndamm verlaufen. 

Wenn man will, kommt man zu Fuß letztlich fast überall durch. Mein Bauchgefühl sagt mir, dass es hier ausreichen würde, wenn ein Weg existiert, der als construction markiert ist. Ich bin mir aber auch nicht sicher :D
ich-ich-ich-ich-ich-ich (2021-10-19 10:25:26+00:00): Ich würde denken, dass der smoothness=horrible Tag genau diese Information enthält und somit ausreicht, damit Routing-Engines verstehen, wen sie dort entlang schicken dürfen und wen nicht.
mueschel (2021-09-07 10:30:31+00:00): Hi,
please check the spelling of your health_level keys, there are many with spelling mistakes.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-10-13 18:13:07+00:00): Hallo cmk23,

ich wollte dich nur darauf aufmerksam machen, dass deine Änderungen (nicht von mir) Rückgängig gemacht worden sind. Ich habe schon versucht den Mapper zu kontaktieren, der das gemacht hat. Siehe hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112175556

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1