piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-01 21:18:53+00:00): Hi erniethepoop, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting buildings, which have been mapped just a few days before? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65065003
ລາວ (2018-12-10 13:52:02+00:00): Using a username containing "dingdong" to do HOT mapping in Africa is at least culturally unaware, but may even be considered insulting. What should your employer (WeWork) think about his?
lingadingdong (2018-12-10 14:28:44+00:00): Hi, i am not exactly sure what you meant in regards of my username. It is a silly name i made up myself when i was young from the onomatopoeia of the bell sounds (ring a ding dong), and have been using it since then. It is definitely not my intention to insult anyone. Also, wework is not my employer. In fact, I joined a mapathon event where the venue was sponsored by wework.
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-01 21:19:30+00:00): Hi delche, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting buildings, which have been mapped just a few days before? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65065107
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-01 21:19:59+00:00): Hi delche, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting buildings, which have been mapped just a few days before? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65065306
Frans S (2021-11-02 11:48:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A. your mappings are often oversized.
You also used the wrong Imagery. Please be sure you use the Maxar imagery here.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/65065311
mavl (2018-12-25 00:10:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:00:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:56:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:00:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:39:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
habi (2018-12-03 09:07:24+00:00): Could you please not draw the buildings over the streets that are already there?
delche (2018-12-03 09:51:11+00:00): Hi habi, do you mean to avoid edges of buildings touching the streets? Otherwise, many of the buildings were already inaccurately mapped over the streets even before i started drawing, which explains the deletions. So sorry if it has caused you more work but i hope you understand.
habi (2018-12-03 10:48:19+00:00): I mean not drawing the buildings *over* the streets, for example like these two: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651395758/history and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651395755/history
mavl (2018-12-25 00:03:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:28:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-01 21:20:24+00:00): Hi Wheels Zhuang, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting buildings, which have been mapped just a few days before? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65065509
mueschel (2018-12-02 09:53:05+00:00): You uploaded a bunch of huge rectangles that are from your internal workflow but shouldn't appear in OSM. Please fix this.
pitscheplatsch (2018-12-03 10:16:13+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65112132
nathan206 (2019-06-19 14:33:29+00:00): Good morning, I see you recently added this link road here: 40.9608368, -73.7367168, can you verify it still exists, current imagery shows it should no longer be there.  Thanks, Nathan
chnav (2018-12-01 10:24:48+00:00): Здравствуйте, когда удаляете данные пожалуйста пишите причину, чтобы остальные пользователи понимали причину. например "Изменена схема движения на перекрёстке", в данном случае Кассина и Сейфуллина. Спасибо.
Minh Nguyen (2019-08-23 04:12:14+00:00): Hi, thanks for your edits in the area. When aligning roads and other features, please switch the background imagery to OSIP 6in Most Current Available, which is newer, higher-resolution, and better aligned. Thanks!
mavl (2018-12-24 23:50:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Филиппок (2018-12-26 16:35:36+00:00): Это не нормально когда несколько остановок Красный восток ,на карте легче смотрится где какой маршрут сворачивает с трассы ,а остановки не запоминаются даже если тыщу раз их проехал , а по номерк чразу видно с первого взгляда , совки всега на картах писали № бусика на остановке , а щас каких то не понятных батыров ,даже местные не произносят их имена , не могут выговорить , зачем и для кого пишут .
mavl (2018-12-25 00:23:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:36:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
4004 (2018-12-02 23:02:24+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты.
название для зданий указывать не нужно, если только на них оно не написано - сомневаюсь, что тут на каждом павильоне надпись?
также, если это обычные ряды рынка (насколько я вижу), то это даже возможно тип здания roof
eggie (2018-12-01 08:58:46+00:00): Dag Egbert. is guesthouse Thuis een serieuze edit? 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-01 09:24:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
47NOE (2018-12-01 08:08:05+00:00): Bonjour,
attention en modifiant la route tertiary en unclassified nous perdons la continuité de la D 19. Source fichier Route 500. J'ai corrigé.
MacDony (2018-12-01 08:16:22+00:00): Bonjour,
La D19 passe bien par la Rue des Écoles, pas par la Rue du Bourg, non ?
47NOE (2018-12-01 08:56:29+00:00): Non, la  D 19 passe bien par la rue du Bourg. Je viens de vérifier avec le fichier Route 500. J'ai donc corrigé la rue des Écoles en supprimant la ref et en la reclassant en residential.
Salutations
MacDony (2018-12-01 09:43:43+00:00): Ok, bon week-end.
manings (2018-12-22 09:17:27+00:00): Roads deleted here may have used the wrong tag, but they seems to exist.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65066893
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2018-12-03 10:33:18+00:00): #WhatInGrabsNameIsThis

1. DO NOT micro-align existing data to imagery without good reason.
2. DO NOT add curves to a road where there is none.

DWG, please revert the whole of this nonsense.
harishpuppala (2018-12-03 11:01:32+00:00): Hi Nutchanon,

As per Digi Standard imagery i edited it in curve shape but not reverted as suggested.

Will make sure such edits are not repeated in future.

Thank You,
harishpuppala
harishpuppala (2018-12-03 11:02:22+00:00): but now*

Sorry for the Typo Error.
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2019-04-07 12:23:01+00:00): I have went through other Grab-related edits on this area, and found that this is a shoddy attempt to fix a mess caused by Grab team themselves- by replacing it with even more mess; adding even more burden to unpaid contributors who have to craft hand-reverts through stack of them.

This edit is now _fully reverted_ by changeset 68883346 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68883346>.
marc__marc (2020-02-24 22:17:18+00:00): Hello,
it this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5812982238 a duplicadte of this https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5812982238 or it's 2 area inside one bigger one ?
Regards,
Marc
mavl (2018-12-24 23:48:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
user_1470980 (2018-12-01 08:42:12+00:00): Hallo _!Y!_
erneut möchte ich Dich daran erinnern, beim Zeichnen von Gebäudeumrissen dem Gebäudegrundriss zu folgen.
Bei diesem Objekt hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651473505 hast Du ein Gebäude über zwei getrennte Grundstücke gezeichnet, obwohl aus dem Luftbild klar erkennbar ist, dass es sich hier um zwei getrennte Gebäude handelt. Ich sehe dass Du entgegen den Richtininen von OpenStreetMap, generell auf keine Changeset Kommentare reagierst, solches Missverhalten kann eine Sperre Deines Accounts auslösen.
Grüße Johann
theophrastos (2018-12-01 17:43:38+00:00): Das ist eine Informationstafel, die Teil des Spaziergangs durch die Gärtnerstadt ist, das Hotel National ist daneben bereits erfaßt, daher Revert.
US Woods (2018-12-01 18:54:57+00:00): Hi Dave,

thank you very much for redrawing this islands!

But may I ask you one thing? Please remove the source=PGS tag from new islands like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/651480822 . The PGS coastlines ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Prototype_Global_Shoreline ) were so bad & ugly that no trace of them should be left.

Kind regards
AlaskaDave (2018-12-02 00:16:24+00:00): I agree that those PGS coastlines are an abomination and I usually delete the source tag but I am doing so many modifications lately I sometimes forget.
Feel free to remove it if you come across a coastline that has been aligned by me or anybody else.
MrMoehritz (2018-12-02 21:35:03+00:00): Nice work! There where no aerial images two days ago, when I tried to map it :-)
I tried to fix the landuse around it here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65106267#map=17/49.44357/8.60526
mavl (2018-12-25 00:10:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-12-01 09:49:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-12-01 09:52:23+00:00): Dag Erik.. Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster. Het heeft geen zin om gebouwen van vorm te veranderen. Je zou de Carport los aan het gebouw moeten zetten als building=roof. Er vinden periodieke updates plaats en dan is de oude situatie weer terug.
MVG,
Eggie
ErikVB71 (2018-12-01 10:01:04+00:00): Dank Eggie. Kan ik wel water intekenen in de wijk waar dit nog niet goed is weergegeven op de kaart?
eggie (2018-12-01 10:34:36+00:00): Uiteraard.. Lokale kennis gewoon belangrijk en we krijgen een betere kaart.
Je werkt wel met een beroerde editor. vanuit het forum bevelen we editor JOSM aan.
Dan kun je ook betere achtergronden laden waarop je edit zoals de BGT omtrekgericht.
Zie: editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

en voor de achtergronden zie: De beste layers om NL te mappen in JOSM
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644

 Succes.
Eggie
Rodrigo Rega (2019-01-27 18:15:22+00:00): Si es posible es recomendable modificar los elementos ya existentes en vez de eliminarlos y crearlos con los datos nuevos. De este modo no se pierde el histórico. Gracias por tus aportaciones, un saludo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65067875
mglbranco (2019-02-10 21:38:20+00:00): Certo, Rodrigo, non me decatara diso :/ Neste caso o concello tiña o mínimo de lugares marcados e intentei axilizar a edición empregando un lugar xa con todos os seus metadatos (concello, provincia, código postal etc.).
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
canfe (2019-11-23 06:52:41+00:00): Ho visto che hai messo un po' di attrazioni turistiche, ma forse andrebbero messe come storici
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic
oppure memorial=plaque
Inoltre non mettere il nome a ciò che è già renderizzato dal tag. la "lapide romana" non può avere come nome "lapide romana"; in genere non dovrebbe avere un nome.
E' un po' come dare il nome di panchina a una panchina...
mavl (2018-12-24 23:37:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Rainero (2018-12-02 10:07:17+00:00): Hallo butch_cooligde,

danke fürs selbst eintragen :)
Ort und Adresse passen aber nicht zusammen.
Ist das Geschäft hier am Hauptbahnhof und Pasinger Bahnhofsplatz stimmt nicht oder ist es umgekehrt, d.h. die Adresse stimmt und der Punkt gehört an den Pasinger Bahnhofsplatz verschoben? Kann ich helfen?

Gruß,
Rainer
BeKri (2018-12-02 22:52:01+00:00): Vorher war er angeblich in der Lilienstr. 42
Position hat da auch schon nicht gestimmt.
Jetzt müsste er irgendwo hier sein.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/48.14864/11.46106
Gruß derBeKri
butch_coolidge (2018-12-04 07:37:50+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe versucht der Marker zum Ziehen nach Pasing aber dann habe ich das verloren am Hauptbahnhof und finde das kleine Knopf nicht mehr. Könnt ihr mich helfen?
BeKri (2018-12-04 15:00:58+00:00): Hallo,
doch schon selber verschoben, geht doch ;-)
Allerdings soll der Laden jetzt mitten auf der Fläche vor der Zugauskunft sein.
Ich weiß leider (noch nicht) wo ihr genau seid
aber kannst Du den Knoten noch einmal ein bißchen dahin schieben, wo ihr wirklich seid ?
Gruss BeKri
abakus_uploader (2018-12-01 23:34:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Филиппок (2018-12-26 15:23:53+00:00): Это улица Набережная ,никто других названий не знает , поэтому надо заменить на уникальную , но улиц Самал в микрорайоне Самал дофига.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:41:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
uks (2019-01-06 10:52:22+00:00): Не нужно указывать адресную информацию на подъездах
eggie (2018-12-01 10:38:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-12-01 10:42:46+00:00): review Kennelijk is de Macaréstraat vanuit het westen toegankelijk. Dan is dit een goede mutatie. Wel kun je niet doorgaande straten beter omtaggen naar highway=residential. 
Tip: Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in de editmodus. Dit geeft vaak schade met editor iD. 
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2018-12-24 23:40:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Anakil (2018-12-01 13:02:29+00:00): Hello Huibc,

Thanks for your contributions ! Just a small improvement on the addresses tagging. Not every building need an address, only some buildings have one (like houses). You also don't need to put the country or the municipality in the addresses as they are implied by the boundary (like this for the postal code https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4727592#map=13/50.7735/4.7683&layers=N ). The only mandatory information (in Belgium) are the "housenumber", the "streetname" (and the postal code if it is different than the usual one in the municipality). In belgium, you really only need the tags "addr:street" and "addr:housenumber" (and optionally "addr:postcode", "addr:city"). Example for this building : addr:housenumber=3 , addr:streetname=Rue du Rivage, (and optionally) addr:postcode=1320, addr:city=Beauvechain.

If you look on the background layer (the "paper layer" symbol on the right when editing) of the PICC for Wallonia, you can see the housenumber when there is one officially (it is inside the polygon). Sometimes it can be wrong but then it need survey on the ground. 

Happy mapping. ;-)
sergeybe (2018-12-01 13:07:20+00:00): Very cool! Thank you!
Sammyhawkrad (2018-12-01 13:18:37+00:00): Welcome
sgbln (2020-09-08 16:19:34+00:00): Is the underpass still under construction?
maciek-szn (2020-09-08 18:04:36+00:00): Yes, it is still closed.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
maraf24 (2018-12-07 09:58:46+00:00): W miejscu Małpki powstał salon kosmetyczny a nie bar: https://adensalon.com/
maraf24 (2018-12-07 18:16:15+00:00): Jakiś bar indyjski jest nieco bardziej na północ.
5m4u9 (2018-12-02 19:56:34+00:00): hola, gracias por editar. tengo una duda? el antiguo puente tenia una sola linea, esta nueva construcción tendrá una o dos carriles?
MOPSV-UTF (2018-12-05 18:54:29+00:00): Si, la antigua si solo era una linea, y esta era  : una linea ferrea, durmiente de quebracho y balasto.
zors1843 (2018-12-02 07:00:14+00:00): Please do not use the name-tag to indicate the kind of building (garage)
gileri (2018-12-01 12:15:23+00:00): Revert : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65071163

Voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63011618
eggie (2018-12-01 11:52:05+00:00): Review: Beste dsprenkels.  Probeer niet te schuiven met de kaart in de editmodus met editor iD. Dat levert vaak schade op. 
Bedrijven graag bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Dat is kennelijk even lastig hier omdat er nog een andere instelling zit. Iets dus om uit te zoeken.
MVG,
Eggie
dsprenkels (2018-12-03 15:52:00+00:00): Ok.

Dan bij de oude adresnode de tags eruit halen, of vernietigen als het een extra node is?
eggie (2018-12-03 15:58:09+00:00): In principe wel, maar in dit geval was de oude node geen officiële BAG adresnode. 
Dus die hele node kon gewoon weg. Dan daarna naar de nieuwe lokatie en de BAG adresnode zoeken. In dit geval dus lastig.
Dit was je edit http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65070165
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-03 15:59:18+00:00): En dus als op de nieuwe lokatie die andere zaak weg is inderdaad de info er uit en de nieuwe info er weer op. Je zelf aangemaakte node kun je dan wissen.
rainerU (2020-02-24 16:30:14+00:00): Salut,

tu as ajouté motor_vehicle=no sur un tronçon de la D62 : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/360585695
S'il s'agit d'une erreur, peux-tu la corriger stp.

Rainer