piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Carssou (2019-07-11 08:28:38+00:00): I drive there everyday, I know geoportail says the split/exit occurs later but in reality it occurs earlier and I can see drivers using GPS (Google do the same mistake) and exiting very late causing dangerous last minute change
freebeer (2019-07-17 10:18:42+00:00): can you check what you have done at https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=72124018 ?

it seems you have not just deleted polygons, but you have somehow managed to mangle others in a way i cannot comprehend, effectively scalping them and causing them to cross themselves, throwing up errors in osmi and failing to render.

there is a large number of these errors for georgia and i have just examined a few, but is this what you intended to do, or is iD somehow deciding what to do instead?

the error that came to my attention does in fact contain mostly trees in imagery, even if approximate, so i cannot tell if your plan was to delete any imprecise polygons or if it was limited to the three deletions in bright red of ways listed below.

you may do better to see the dark red of your geometry changes by changing the achavi base layer to something like osm pale, or osm grey, or lose the new green against plain osm.

thanks
Kirbert (2019-07-17 19:30:07+00:00): Yeah, that happens.  In general *ALL* of those polygons need to be deleted, but I can't get to all of them at once.  I have to sleep sometime.  And sometimes I don't make it back to where I was working before.
Leo Slager (2019-07-11 14:13:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Leo Slager (2019-07-11 14:15:37+00:00): Dag ikkedus,
In NL is het gebruikelijk de gegevens van de zaak te taggen op de adresnode.
Zo worden dubbele adressen in de database voorkomen.
Gebouwen en adressen worden rechtstreeks geïmporteerd vanuit de bAG van het Kadaster.
ik verander het even.
dmlu (2019-07-12 09:46:49+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap! As this is your first contribution to OSM, I took the liberty of (briefly) checking over your edit.

Your first contribution to OSM looks good, you even took the time to add a source and a proper changeset description :)

Thank you for your contribution!
Supaplex (2019-08-09 17:01:12+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DD1GJ (2019-07-11 09:25:11+00:00): OSM ist eine Geodatenbank und kein "Malwerkzeug" zur künstlerischen Ausgestaltung einer Karte anhand der Konturen der Baumkronen. Beantworte bitte die gestellten Fragen und arbeite dich bitte gründlichst ein. Verwende bitte den im Tutorial beschriebenen Editor JOSM, der auch ein hochaufgelöstes Luftbild der Metropolregion Ruhr bereitstellt. 

Deine momentanen Edits schaden leider mehr als sie Nutzen bringen.
DaveF (2019-08-12 17:05:52+00:00): Is this path inaccessible? access=no?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30241165#map=15/51.3148/-2.3773
Arminus (2019-07-18 15:02:19+00:00): I don't think the access path for the ferrata should be marked as highway=via_ferrata with a via_ferrata_scale? That only seems valid for the ferrata itself, i.e. way 40526818?
Gh0stz0x (2019-07-19 07:32:38+00:00): If the path is like this: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dvia_ferrata ok, if different, the surface tag and the SAC scale should be used. 😁
PT-53 (2019-07-14 05:40:26+00:00): Hallo Syncronius,
bitte verwende statt "Maschenzaun" den korrekten englischen Begriff.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:fence%20type?uselang=de
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-14 05:41:58+00:00): Ist das https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683967779/history wirklich ein reiner Radweg oder dürfen da auch fußgänger gehen? Dann wäre path die richtige Klassifikation.
PT-53 (2019-07-21 06:54:04+00:00): Hallo Syncronius, 
den Weg hast du ja zwischenzeitlich in path abgeändert. Jezt fehlt noch die Korrektur von  Maschenzaun https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/683971888/history in Maschendrahtzaun, wie im Wiki aufgeführt.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-30 06:09:52+00:00): Hallo Syncronius, 
es wäre schön, wenn du noch reagieren würdest.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-11 05:58:45+00:00): Fence-Typ auf chain_link geändert.
XY22 (2019-07-14 07:05:35+00:00): Hallo Rogehm,
einen Lidl gibt es hier nicht. Der Laden heißt wirklich Idil.
PT-53 (2019-07-14 05:38:10+00:00): Hallo  Syncronius,
ein Sportplatz ist kein "Stadium". 
leisure=sports_centre dürfte passender sein.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-21 06:55:01+00:00): Hallo Syncronius, 
schaust Du Dir bitte das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-07-30 06:09:16+00:00): Hallo Syncronius, 
es wäre schön, wenn du noch reagieren würdest.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-11 06:02:20+00:00): leisure=stadium in leisure=sports_centre geändert
frydzio (2019-07-11 10:33:01+00:00): Objazd węzła Otwock jest poprowadzony przez wschodnie rondo, nie zachodnie
https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showpost.php?p=160607738&postcount=9108
letihu (2021-02-15 19:32:52+00:00): tags fehlen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703310451/history#map=17/50.98111/9.31613&layers=N
BCNorwich (2019-07-11 14:14:39+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The tags you added to the canal bank are not needed. The name and all relevant tags are on the main stream line of the waterway. Thus I've made amendments.

Regards Bernard.
Luzandro (2019-07-13 05:18:47+00:00): Hi,
please use separate changesets for different countries. It's more comprehensible what you did and you don't show up in the feeds of people half over europe, who are looking for changes in their region.
thx
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72125720
s8evq (2019-11-14 10:32:47+00:00): Dag JosV. Ik wou nog even terugkomen op deze changeset van juli 2019. Volgens mij is het in dit geval niet nodig om op iedere way van de relatie een forward of backward role te plaatsen. Enkel als de route tweemaal over dezelfde way gaat moet je de logische volgorde bepalen met forward/backward.
s8evq (2019-11-14 10:34:16+00:00): Voor de duidelijkheid, dus bijvoorbeeld op dit stukje https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8685360#map=19/50.95191/3.13048 waar er een "heen en terug" is.
naveenpf (2019-10-18 12:34:57+00:00): Hello 

Welcome to Openstreetmap

Kerala OSM
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala

Join telegram group 
https://t.me/osmkerala

Thanks
naveenpf
BCNorwich (2019-07-11 14:22:12+00:00): Hi,  
It would be good if you did not place buildings over mapped highways. Better to amend/correct the highway line. Also please don't join building to a highway.

Regards Bernard.
czubi (2019-07-11 15:55:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1838558#map=14/50.8216/10.3162&layers=N

Hast du das Stück vergessen oder ist es nicht freigegeben?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472809983
osm-esa (2019-07-11 23:30:49+00:00): Das Acces no hatte ich gar nicht auf dem Schirm. Hat der, der die Freigabe eingegeben hat, wohl vergessen.
czubi (2019-07-13 11:16:49+00:00): Ok danke.
Nochne Frage. Ist das tatsächlich so das man hier (noch) nicht auffahren darf 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127658644 . Da ist noch access:backward=no dran!?
osm-esa (2019-07-13 16:16:20+00:00): Keine Ahnung daran habe ich nichts geändert. Habe nur die Bundesstraße durchgehend auf primary gesetzt.
Da sind wahrscheinlich noch ein paar bugs dran. Die aber nicht Gegenstand eines Änderungssatzkommentars sein sollten.
osm-esa (2019-07-13 16:18:14+00:00): Ergänzung: Editor iD, Nach Fragen:-{
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-07 15:38:39+00:00): Hello!

You used
incline=up_5
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234180345/history

Have you maybe meant
incline=up
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
gileri (2019-07-27 14:26:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention dans votre modification vous avez fait glisser le bar "Le rubis".
TCL Relation Usagers (Transports en Commun Lyonnais) (2019-07-29 08:56:18+00:00): Bonjour,
La position du pub a été rectifiée. Merci pour votre remarque.
chnav (2019-07-12 07:47:45+00:00): Я перенёс название КлараСапар в old_name. description со всяклой рекламой удалил ("самый большой... по данным ...."), это бесполезная информация для карты, ткт не рейтинговый сервис. Спасибо за понимание.
tux67 (2019-07-11 11:09:42+00:00): Hi weikOnline,

bitte nie nur einen Namen mappen. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72129862
Es gibt für diesen Fall craft=window_construction
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72129862
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72126897
mbethke (2019-07-22 08:25:06+00:00): Is that actually an electrical vehicle charging station? It's sitting in the middle of the road now so I'll move it a bit north, that looks like the most likely location on aerial imagery. Feel free to fix if that's wrong.
likhors (2019-07-22 10:21:04+00:00): No it is a railway bridge above the raod (as explained) but I do not knw how to indicate a railway bridge. Please tell me how to correct road infomations such as paved or unpaved roads, bridges, ferries replaced by bridges etc. I work from my telephone and have very bad connection, so I cannot use the openstretmap website, too heavy on the connection
BCNorwich (2019-07-11 14:37:36+00:00): Hi, are you sure this section of highway is named FOX Lane rather than Middle Street. Could you pleas say the source of the information.

Thanks Bernard.
Zabir91 (2019-08-02 15:16:01+00:00): For your kind information, It's name should be TNO->টিএনও, not টিওনো.  means 'Thana Nirbahi Officer'
Thanks.
user_5359 (2019-07-11 15:20:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (you are not a church). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
mike140 (2019-07-13 11:22:13+00:00): Этот дом https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9773674#map=19/50.50798/30.83510 нарисован неправильно, поэтому он и не отображается на карте. Мультиполигоны лучше делать в Josm или не трогать вообще, Если есть желание в них разобраться пишите в личку
tux67 (2019-07-11 11:14:07+00:00): Update based on survey and CS 72126897
ndm (2019-07-11 19:04:35+00:00): "name" should really be what's on the signage.
Moved the names to description.
abakus_uploader (2019-07-11 22:30:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Hjart (2019-07-11 12:00:22+00:00): You managed to attach this to an administrative border rather than to the road next to it. I've fixed this though. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/214266497#map=19/57.23511/9.75175
ClarkstonCorrect (2019-07-12 01:58:39+00:00): the area was from the east renfrewshire masterplan list. i think i messed up on the roads but the area is correct
user_5359 (2019-07-11 15:11:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you have any information that the highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703363713 isn't connect to the other highways (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10523418 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/501109542)?
gseethar (2019-07-13 16:13:05+00:00): Hi User_5359,

(Responding on behalf of iggujja)
Iggujja did not make the connections at the above mentioned points because the latest satellite imagery (ESRI World imagery - March 2018) shows presence of some barriers/gates.
The roads could have been connected with an assumption that by july 2019 the construction would have been completed. But we do not have any proof to make that edit.

Can you please help us with your advise/suggestion on how to go about this issue? We are eager to work with the community to learn and further improve our edits.

Regards,
Ganesh
user_5359 (2019-07-17 16:36:17+00:00): if you take a closer look at the Esri aerial photograph, you can still see flexible obstacles at all three. These are not present in the Mazar Premium aerial photo. The picture seems to be from a more recent date, as some houses are finished, which are still under construction in Esri.
But not everything can be clarified by aerial photos. In this case an on-site inspection would be useful. I will take notes in the hope that a local user will take a look.

Regards
Georg V.
gseethar (2019-07-17 17:10:26+00:00): Hi Georg V,

Thanks a lot for your update. As you suggested there is a little ambiguity/clarity in the aerial imageries.
Thanks a lot for dropping notes. Looking forward to learning more from you.

Regards,
Ganesh
freebeer (2019-07-18 18:28:10+00:00): hallo georg,

sorry that i commented on the notes you opened before i was aware of this changeset discussion.

i would update the map to reflect the maxar imagery as it is the newest and probably itself some months old, so that some of the house outlines in the earth seen in maxar, may very well be completed as structures now.

i feel it is better to have the map reflect the completed state of the aerial imageries of a completely connected neighbourhood, than to await on-the-ground confirmation of the same, which in my experience, may not happen for years in this part of the world.

of course, there is the danger someone will report later that there is no access as posted by signs, as i am well aware happens often in comments to remote mapping in the uk, and i suspect gseethar has experienced this far too often, where there actually are on-the-ground mappers to offer feedback, that i expect to be unlikely here.

schoenen abend noch
freebeer (2019-07-22 09:34:25+00:00): iggujja,  gseethar, and anyone else who may be monitoring this discussion, sorry for the late follow-up here, but...

in the case of barriers, temporary or permanent, the way of drawing the road in the esri imagery state, is not to leave a gap where a barrier is suspected, but to close and connect the ways to reflect what is actually constructed.

then the barrier is added as a node as part of the way, as presumably the visible barriers do not apply to all modes of transport such as pedestrians and likely cyclists.

only if there is an obvious gap between the roads should they be unconnected (and usually there will be something to connect the two, whether a footpath, a short section of construction, or similar).

this would also be the case if there were to be a permanent gate erected at this point to limit the traffic.

the difficulty there would be to determine the proper access values to be used, for which an on-site inspection or recent street-level photos should be used.

with the gaps as mapped now, routers will avoid using these segments, regardless of their present status, diverting people who could give feedback from actually checking out the situation unless they wonder why they were directed a less direct inefficient route.
gseethar (2019-07-25 12:59:27+00:00): Hi freebeer,

Thanks for the follow-up. I have connected the roads as per the latest digital globe imagery - July 2019 and connected the roads.
 Changeset #72643945

Please let me know your suggestions.

Regards,
Ganesh
tanonin (2020-07-24 20:59:33+00:00): Make sure to use square mode for building and cadastre for more accurate area
DaveF (2019-07-12 10:00:33+00:00): Hi
To check again, has the car park for the Bell Inn been dug up/removed? If it exists, it should still be mapped. Add access=no to indicate it's closed
DaveF (2019-07-12 10:50:52+00:00): Also, is this accessible to the public?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703365925

Names should be official/signed names. Use 'description=' 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703365925
DD1GJ (2019-07-11 21:51:48+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz wurde komplett zürückgesetzt.

Da hast leider zahlreiche Hausnummern ersatzlos gelöscht. Bei dem unerwünschten Übertragen von POIs auf Gebäude gingen Informationen verloren.
DaveF (2019-07-12 09:29:17+00:00): Hi 
Welcome to OSM

To check, is the Pathfinder Place development fully completed?
If it's still being built the tag to use is landuse=construction.  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction

Are any of the roads accessible?
NJECC (2019-07-12 15:26:52+00:00): It's still being built, Show homes open next month.
seattlefyi (2019-07-12 00:17:15+00:00): Hi, glad to see the edit, but do you know if the address is still valid? I suggest deleting just the tags pertaining to the closed business may be the thing to do here. Thanks again for the edit!
EAman (2019-07-12 06:34:16+00:00): Good point. I added a node with just the address now.
seattlefyi (2019-07-12 23:48:57+00:00): No problem, we're all doing the best we can! I think this address thing is an easy detail to overlook, so thought I'd waste some time looking for instances worldwide and reach out to strangers. Cheers and thanks for the fix!
Leruon (2019-07-11 13:08:19+00:00): Corregidos sentidos de giro
DaveF (2019-07-12 11:07:38+00:00): FYI, In the iD editor there's a option to 'square' pitches/buildings etc - select object ,right click, Square.
NJECC (2019-07-12 15:30:54+00:00): Thanks for that will do that in future.
Leo Slager (2019-07-11 13:28:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
nsz5 (2019-07-23 18:37:50+00:00): точнее 15 домов
mueschel (2019-07-17 22:23:11+00:00): Hi,
you added the tags "tyre_blower" and "tyre blower" on several nodes. I guess you ment to use "compressed_air" - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcompressed_air

Could you have a look and fix this?
Thanks
Jan
jozin-belgium (2022-01-25 18:46:55+00:00): Hi Jan, ik hou mij al enkele jaren niet meer bezig met tankstations. Het is onmogelijk voor mij om die allemaal terug te vinden.
mueschel (2022-01-25 18:53:46+00:00): Hi,
these have been corrected by now. There are no more tags containing "blower" in the database.
aixbrick (2019-07-11 13:28:59+00:00): Hi,
please see this comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72116545.
Regards
Nakaner-repair (2019-07-11 15:15:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 72141179 where the changeset comment is: Revert addition of highways in a coal mine. They have been removed. Please turn on your brain before editing! Thank you.
tmmanish (2019-07-11 16:24:34+00:00): Hi Nakaner-repair,

Thanks for your comments. From Satellite imagery we identified it to be a missing road so added the service road over here. However, from the community's local knowledge, I have understood that it is a mining area. Thanks for reverting the edit. Happy to learn from the local community.
	
Best Regards,
tmmanish
Nakaner (2019-07-11 16:58:04+00:00): Dear tmmanish, dear supervisor of tmmanish,

thank you for your quick response.

It does not require local knowledge to see that adding roads in this area is stupid (sorry, but there is no other term being more precise). If the OSM data differs a lot from satellite imagery, all alarm bells should ring. You should investigate why OSM data is different. There are either hints by note=* tags on some objects or just the precense of totally "wrong" (wrong according to the imagery) landuse, that things have changed.

I hope that you see from my comment which changes might be necessary to the workflow to comply with OSM's best practices. If not, don't heshitate to say it.

Best regards

Michael
jguthula (2019-07-11 17:14:28+00:00): Hi Nakaner,

Totally inclined with your suggestions and we are considering them as the valuable inputs to improve our editing process. Please do consider these errors as the new mapper errors as this is the first time the edits were made in Germany. From our past experience in the US we identified the land-use layer to be outdated or added from a wrong import and that is the reason we didn't consider that. But going forward we will consider your suggestion and make proper edits.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
iandees (2019-07-11 14:47:20+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM. Note that you should try to keep your edits in the same geographic area. You also didn't connect these two driveways to any existing roads.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72136322
kirrawat (2019-07-12 07:46:55+00:00): Hi Iandees,

Thanks for your suggestions. I will follow it going forward.
I went through both the driveways and it looks connected to the highway.
can you help me understand the connectivity issue here?

Regards,
kirrawat
iandees (2019-07-12 12:21:43+00:00): I misread the change report, they are indeed connected. Thanks for your response and I look forward to all your changes!
kirrawat (2019-07-12 12:42:07+00:00): Thanks Iandees. Looking forward to learning from you.

Regards,
kirrawat
abakus_uploader (2019-07-11 22:30:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SHARCRASH (2022-07-31 10:00:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez mis la mairie de Morfontaine ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6605406468 sur la surface d'une école https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/703381137 dans le même changeset. Ca ne me semble pas cohérent. Le bâtiment ne me semblait pas du tout être une école. C'est écrit "Maison communale" sur le bâtiment où vous avez mis le node. Mais plus loin je vois cette 2e mairie de Morfontaine
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8941419398 Pourriez-vous clarifier tout ça? Merci!
Rom1 (2022-07-31 10:47:05+00:00): Bonjour, c'est fait. Merci pour l'alerte. Un nouveau bâtiment a été construit. On peut le voir en photo sur https://mairie-morfontaine.fr/