piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-09-02 10:08:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:

A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.

These issues have been seen on many of your changesets. 
Depending on the quantity and severity of the issues, your mappings will be reverted or adjusted.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122835509
treestryder (2022-06-25 14:48:24+00:00): A few weeks ago, I rode the B2B and did not see this trail branching off. Is it there and I just missed it?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability
treestryder (2022-06-25 14:51:00+00:00): If it is not there, yet, maybe the use of the "planned:" or "proposed:" namespaces would be appropriate here.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
c0nsumer (2022-06-25 14:56:17+00:00): It's there, today is the official grand opening per the Poto MBA and Michigan DNR. Give this a read for more info: https://www.facebook.com/dtetrail/posts/5305526459505766
treestryder (2022-06-25 15:44:22+00:00): Very good. Just wanted to make sure.

In case you didn't already know this, Michigan mappers have been meeting each month. See the WIki for information. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Community
c0nsumer (2022-06-25 16:08:06+00:00): Thanks for the check, I've been doing trail mapping for a while. ;)

Pretty neat about the in-person meetings. I'll keep an eye on them.
laurent-38 (2022-06-25 14:43:38+00:00): Bonjour Grandasse,

Ces modifications, consistant à retirant la bande cyclable sur la D522, me semblent erronées : les portions de chaussée situées à droite de la bande de rive sont indiquée comme voie cyclable à la sortie de chaque giratoire. 
Voir par exemple https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=221681636027610 

ou encore https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2847626185454750

De plus, un marquage au sol rappelle le caractère cyclable : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=155223203150361 ou https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=207805931156256 

Aussi, j'envisage d'annuler ce lot de modifications.

~~
laurent
laurent-38 (2022-06-30 20:15:52+00:00): Modifications annulées, voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123059760
Msiipola (2022-06-26 06:02:42+00:00): Hej! Angående addera parkering. Då jag ser att du är ny på detta, vill jag informera om ett par saker.
"Gravel" används väldigt mycket, överallt. Det är dock inte det vad vi menar med "grus". Snarare det som finns i vid järnvägsspår. Väldigt grovt. Kolla i osm-wiki.
Parkeringsplatsen verkar något felaktigt positionerad. Viktigt att bakgrundsbilder kalibreras mot kända referenser. Eftersom du använder JOSM, så välj lager Trafikverket Road Network, och justera bild så att den stämmer med den. INNAN du ritar nya objekt.
Hälsningar
Markku
TallTall (2022-06-26 19:08:39+00:00): Hej, tack för informationen! Detta borde nu vara fixat med ändringsuppsättning 122878354. 

Egentligen skapade jag inte geometrin för parkeringsplatsen, utan lade endast till nya taggar på en redan existerande parkeringsplats. Hur som helst så fixade jag positioneringen, och det är ändå hjälpsamt att veta till vilket lager man borde justera satellitbilderna. 

// TallTall
marco406 (2022-07-11 14:20:19+00:00): Cześć, to co zaznaczyłeś jako woda w KP OUOW to są warstwy gliny lub iłów uszczelniających podłoże. W KP będzie inna technologia składowania odpadów niż w obiekcie głównym, odpady będą wstępnie zagęszczane i nie będzie wody. A tu masz fotki jak to wygląda: https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/g%C5%82og%C3%B3w-polkowice-lubin-legnica-inwestycje-kghm.996627/post-172204711
cyberatlas (2023-07-24 16:17:35+00:00): Nie wiedziałem o tym, widziałem zdjęci satelitarne i tam była woda
Warin61 (2022-12-21 01:30:11+00:00): Hi,
Some of these phones are 'under ground' - as are the roads they are associtated with. In OSM this 'under ground' atribute is tagged using the key layer, you will find it on the associated roads and the phones should have the same value .. I thing that is mostly 'layer=-1'. I have done 2 of them under the new Art Gallery construction.
little_maper (2022-12-22 09:13:48+00:00): Hello Ahmad-0772;
I see you add "access=no" to these links, Are these links still closed or open now?
Examples
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1065861642
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1065861652
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1062726995
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1065861654
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1065861648
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1065861655
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1065861656
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/1065861650
Regards
little_maper
vng_me (2022-06-26 07:41:41+00:00): After adding new coastline geometry here, validator fails. Should remove old coastlines like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847219206
archie (2022-06-26 09:27:22+00:00): Thanks for pointing out. I did fix it.
user_3022894 (2023-04-13 14:49:20+00:00): Hi tobim91,

sorry, kurze Rückfrage:

Was hast du hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267055148

für Radwege eingetragen? Ist dort in Richtung Elberfeld wirklich ein baulich abgesetzter Radweg errichtet worden, der nicht Teil der Fahrbahn ist (cycleway=track)?

Viele Grüße
Lukas aka Elefant
canfe (2022-06-25 17:10:11+00:00): Ma via Tavagnasco non c'è lì attorno!
Inoltre la formattazione del telefono non è quella standard.
Cassiano Bruno Drovetti (2022-06-26 07:10:15+00:00): Le indicazioni sono esatte!
La ditta si chiama Dadee è un Agri macelleria, la locazione è Via Quassolo 3, 10010, Tavagnasco (TO) Italia
Cassiano Bruno Drovetti (2022-06-26 07:13:57+00:00): il numero di telefono è esatto è un cellulare
Andrea Musuruane (2022-06-26 07:55:19+00:00): Ciao. Dalle immagini satellitari, questo POI è posizionato in mezzo a un prato. E' corretto? Se è una macelleria, il tag da usare è shop=butcher e non shop=health_food. Il nome della strada si scrive sempre con l'iniziale maiuscola. Quindi "Via Quassolo" e non "via Quassolo". Inoltre, il numero di telefono si formatta diversamente: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122836953
Ze0zohk1 (2022-08-01 06:46:33+00:00): Hallo Parchim,

Wiso hast du bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1072967160/history segregated=yes getaggt.  Ich bin gerade vor Ort (siehe Notiz) und für mich (an der Stelle wo ich stehe) ist das definitiv =no.

Hast du mehr Infos die =yes rechtfertigen? (Z. B. das er noch getrennt werden soll.)

Grüße 
Peter
Ze0zohk1 (2022-08-01 06:58:29+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3293436
Patchi (2022-08-01 06:59:10+00:00): Hi Peter, 

Es war im Juni noch nicht 100% fertig und vermutlich habe ich den falschen Button in jOSM genommen (segregated=yes statt segegated=no). In der Regel sind viele solche Wege nicht getrennt. Du kannst also es ruhig korrigieren.

Schöne Grüβe,

Patchi.
Ze0zohk1 (2022-08-01 07:42:37+00:00): Okay. Ich hab's korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124330457 lieber einmal zu viel gefragt als zu wenig 😉

Viele Grüße
gscscnd (2022-06-26 06:42:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122562144
The Polish (2022-06-26 07:28:20+00:00): Poprawiłem.
bxl-forever (2022-07-10 18:36:46+00:00): Hello,

Technically you are right, because as long ar routing is concerned, "oneway=yes" applies to all modes of transport at once.

But there is a reason why we set in on some streets:

(1) We regularly query the database to extract all streets having "oneway=yes" and no additional tag for cyclists.  This will typically give all roads where the oneway tag was added by a user who just forgot to think about cyclists, and who unnecessarily broke cycle routing.  So we can inspect and fix appropriately.  When we have "oneway:bicycle=yes" we can see that the situation was already reviewed by a human and we don’t need to review the same street over and over.  That saves a lot of time.

(2) There are some mobile apps such as StreetComplete that people can use when on the field: the app will look for incomplete data around the user and will ask to review about this missing tag.  Same problem as (1): if the asks the same question to dozens of people, chances are high that at least one person will incorrectly answer it and put incorrect information into the database.

(3) We normally do this only for roads where there is a reasonable suspicion that it might qualify for a SUL/BEV, i.e. residential roads.  Of course, not for motorways, roundabout, boulevards as two parallel ways or other obvious cases.  But those roads here are perfect candidates.  That’s why we prefer to be on the safe side.
vng_me (2022-06-26 07:44:30+00:00): This coastline https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/962538356 is broken
archie (2022-06-26 09:27:59+00:00): Thanks for pointing out. I fixe it.
lyctkel (2022-07-05 07:18:39+00:00): Hi Seetroll,
gerade stolpere ich über https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101243114
Hier verwendest Du 
building=Gewerblich .
Das ist etwas ungewöhnlich. Das Gebäude ist ja (nach meiner Erinnerung) ein Hotelgebäude. Demnach sollte 
building=hotel
building:use=commercial
besser passen.
Herzliche Grüsse,
lyctkel
Seetroll (2022-07-05 11:13:35+00:00): Hallo Iyctkel,
dem ist leider nicht mehr so mit einem Hotelgebäude. Es dient mittlerweile als Abstellraum. Auch der Biergarten nebenan gibt es nicht mehr. Lediglich das Gästehaus Linde wird noch betrieben.
Grüße
 Seetroll
mariotomo (2022-06-25 19:17:49+00:00): hola, y welcome to Panamá.
https://welcome.osm.be/panama
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-28 05:30:40+00:00): Imagery that predates the first time you changed this to a park and also imagery very recent shows that this as a fenced-in compound which is about 90% asphalt and buildings. In what way could you possibly define this as a park by OSM definitions?
brayackmedia (2022-06-28 10:29:13+00:00): We planted a bunch of trees and have picnic shelters and tables etc. it’s pretty nice.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-28 10:54:05+00:00): Sure, okay, so map the specific areas that have trees, picnic tables and shelters separately (including access - can anyone walk in and use them?) rather than changing the entire Division of Highways, Materials Control Soils and Testing into a park.
mariotomo (2022-06-25 19:13:43+00:00): nice, thank you!
if you would be able to collect bus stop names? ciao, looking forward to seeing more contribs from you.
k2arim99 (2022-06-26 15:28:04+00:00): Sure thing, I'm using street complete to mark what I know around the place I live in, but I would be happy to name em too
mariotomo (2022-06-26 16:04:41+00:00): any little bit helps. if you do enjoy OSM, you could help the database with shops, restaurants, banks, and all that cannot possibly be mapped remotely.
consider that StreetComplete lets you add notes, and associate pictures to notes. this lets remote mappers process the information that local people collect.
I see you just joined the Telegram group. welcome!
VictorIE (2022-07-11 04:36:35+00:00): Hi

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9846387324

Is this disconnected for a reason?
b-unicycling (2022-07-11 09:16:54+00:00): Sorry, it probably happened, because I was working with the tiles on the task manager.
VictorIE (2022-07-14 06:44:43+00:00): The thing is, I could have sworn I had joined them up the previous day. :)
Đuro Jiří (2022-06-25 14:38:00+00:00): Ciao,ho cancellato questo numero civico e l'ho aggiunto al B&B insieme a maggiori informazioni.
BCNorwich (2022-06-25 17:26:41+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Being a residential area this feature looks more like a prank than a bank, thus I've removed it. 

Regards Bernard.
mavl (2023-06-21 16:02:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
kersentaart (2022-07-02 18:13:33+00:00): Why did you remove the new padel fields?
Staliom (2022-07-02 18:54:31+00:00): Sorry, I edited the mobile phone antenna and realized that the padel courts did not appear on the most recent satellite images. So I wanted to keep the map up to date by deleting these :/
kersentaart (2022-07-02 18:56:35+00:00): No prob, I re-added them. They don't show up yet on most imagery but I surveyed locally for the location of them
Staliom (2022-07-02 19:02:18+00:00): Nice job! Sorry for the inconvenience
JeroenHoek (2022-06-25 20:44:56+00:00): Nee width volstaat, maar wederom: dit is niet de route waarover de brandweer werd gestuurd, dat waren de boerenpaden parallel hieraan 400m naar het oosten.
HJGroenVRFR (2022-06-27 06:54:17+00:00): Oke. het grootste probleem voor de navigatie is het gewicht op het deel Bosksumerdyk. dit is in nav zelf nu aangepast. dit gebied maar in de gaten houden met alle vernieuwingen.
bedankt voor de hulp
Tomas Straupis (2022-06-25 17:27:28+00:00): Chrm. Labai prasta mikrosofto „atpažintų“ pastatų kokybė. Juos reikia arba pataisyti pagal realią ORT10LT, arba nekelti iš viso.
DaveF (2022-06-26 16:29:51+00:00): Hi
What's this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1073348157
mot_tom (2022-06-26 16:47:08+00:00): Hi DaveF,
This way is meant to show how the railway (including the current station, the disused parts to the east, and the Metrolink line/High Level Road) are elevated above the surrounding area. If you think this should be shown differently on the map, I'd be happy to edit this (eg separate sections).
Thanks, mot_tom
DaveF (2022-06-27 03:00:24+00:00): A bridge tag is for objects that span over other objects.

This appears to be more a raised area,of solid ground.
I would tag using landuse=railway (is all of the polygon used/owned by a railway company?)
I would add level=1 to any items within the polygon and layer=X to those that are passing over other objects.
mot_tom (2022-06-27 10:20:37+00:00): Hi, that makes sense, I'll make those edits later this week when I've got some free time. Thanks for the advice.
adrianojbr (2022-06-28 14:48:05+00:00): Olá, nggz! Não são só as características físicas que definem a classe das vias. Nesse caso da "Rua Coronel Caetano Costa", apesar de ter sido elevada para terciária, em alguns cruzamentos (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1348747198/ e https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1348747195/) ela não tem preferência em relação a ruas que residenciais. Depois de asfaltada, as paradas obrigatórias também mudaram?

Além disso, o link não leva notícia alguma e não encontrei também notícia a respeito do asfaltamento usando a pesquisa.
adrianojbr (2022-06-30 15:25:53+00:00): Olá, nggz! Favor responder ou precisarei desfazer as alterações que você fez.
adrianojbr (2022-07-07 17:47:52+00:00): Por falta de comunicação, vou desfazer as mudanças.
SomeoneElse (2022-06-27 13:28:42+00:00): Hello,
Just for info, I've split https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245997566 off from the longer service road and added it to the two relations here.
Best Regards,
Andy
aceman444 (2025-10-11 00:09:40+00:00): Zdravim. Ked mate vodu v tuneli pod zemou s layer=-1, nie su cesty nad nou mostami. A naozaj tam ta Jelsina tecie pod zemou? A ako moze mat dalsi pritok z pola s rovnakym nazvom?
Dino Michelini (2022-06-26 10:48:40+00:00): Cio ti segnalo che nel mappare il percorso 1058054417 hai inserito tag che non si usano con highway ma con l'oggetto route; infatti, route=mtb è usata solo nelle relazioni (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:route?uselang=it). In altre parole se vuoi creare ua relazione di tipo MTB per essere visualizzata in https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/ e gestita da un routing sarebbe oportuno lasciare iD e iniziare ad usare JOSM (https://learnosm.org/it/josm/josm-relations/). Per cui, il tag route=mtb va cancellato e va creata una relazione di tipo mtb.
Larmax (2022-06-25 20:13:35+00:00): Most of those service areas are routable, so, according to the wiki highway=service + area=yes is fine https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
SomeoneElse (2022-06-25 16:51:23+00:00): Also a bit of near "Little Sessay, from survey 24/06/2022"
Sieva (2022-08-17 02:55:52+00:00): Hi, looks like you marked Queensborough Bridge West Sidewalk one-way heading northbound. This is incorrect to my knowledge, I'll change the direction to the opposite one. Feel free to contact me.
-- Sieva
Jorisbo (2022-08-17 07:01:34+00:00): Hi Sieva! thank you , gr Joris
ma-rt-in (2022-07-07 06:49:06+00:00): Hallo,

spannende Frage, hast du das foot/bicycle=no einfach so gesetzt, oder warst du vor Ort.
Bin letztens mal da durch gefahren und nichts entdeckt von Verbotsschildern.

vg
findichgut (2022-07-08 04:19:11+00:00): Hallo,
"einfach so" setze ich sicher keine solchen Verbote. Sowohl im Norden als auch Süden waren unübersehbar die üblichen Verbotsschilder für Fußgänger und Radfahrer zu sehen. Wozu sollte es auch sonst die offiziellen Umleitungen geben?
Ansonsten wird mir die Geschichte hier langsam zu bunt, notiert doch was ihr wollt, ich bin jetzt aus der unseligen Geschichte mit der BAB-Baustelle raus.
josmougn (2026-01-14 10:05:36+00:00): Salut Tykayn
En corrigeant la note nº 5078487 je constate que tu as mis "Action" (avec "description=restaurant à l'étage avec une salle de jeux pour enfants") sur plusieurs noeuds et c'est manifestement par erreur.
Tu confirmes ?
Il faudrait corriger les points concernés.

J'ai corrigé celui de la note : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/818827456
emersonveenstra (2022-06-26 13:01:18+00:00): Hi,

Your stream crosses 2 roads, and you didn't add a bridge or tunnel for them. Could you please do that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122843669
user_2066394 (2022-06-25 23:23:37+00:00): Das ergibt ein Duplikat mit Hausnummer 6 hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242415612
CaptainCrunch (2022-06-25 19:42:50+00:00): Hallo, Danke für deine Ergänzungen. Aber ist auf dem Parkplatz zwischen Verwaltungsgericht und Sparkasse wirklich ein Autoteilehändler?
Die Ladestation an der Nürnberger Str./Eyber Str. ist jetzt 3-fach erfasst und die am Karlsplatz doppelt. Das solltest du noch korrigieren.
Bei Fragen kannst du dich gerne melden.
syntex (2022-06-25 20:29:29+00:00): To zaraz zmienię tą drogę również na living_street
Stalker61 (2022-06-27 03:48:56+00:00): Добрый день. Неужели за полтора месяца здесь произошли такие глобальные изменения? Ну и бинг очень сильно смущает.
Stalker61 (2022-06-27 03:51:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122845952#map=16/60.3713/29.4834
И вот этот "обрубок" 41К-088 непонятен.
literan (2022-06-27 16:38:34+00:00): стройка там вовсю идет, но обрубок, конечно, надо присоединить к трассе
Stalker61 (2022-06-27 17:19:29+00:00): Я не о продолжении строительства, а об удалении объезда. А работы ведутся вот отсюда и далее в сторону Выборга - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122845952#map=17/60.32932/29.72661
ZLima12 (2022-06-25 22:15:32+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing! I'm more or less okay with NY-22 being primary, at least in most of Westchester. Mamaroneck Avenue probably deserves it too, though I don't get over that way too much.

That said, you've been making a lot of significant classification changes over the last day, for the most part seemingly copied verbatim from NYSDOT. Though there are new classification guidelines in place that are based on NYSDOT data, NYC and the area around it isn't as solidified as the rest of the state.

If you're going to be making a lot of classification changes, please have a voice in the community and ask for opinions before you make significant changes. The #local-newyorkstate channel in the OSMUS Slack (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) is a great place to start. If you could join and let us know your intentions before making these changes, we can make sure there's consensus before anyone puts in the time to change anything.

Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122846000
eggie (2022-06-26 07:07:04+00:00): Mooi.. gelukt zie ik.. 😀
Groet
Eggie
cserpell (2022-06-27 23:04:59+00:00): Estimado, cambié mercado por tienda multiservicio.
alexgsy (2022-06-25 19:50:55+00:00): Здравствуйте prostislav1. 
Пожалуйста не ставьте неправильные теги. На пляже Блюдечко поверхность точно не compacted (песок гравий укатанный катком) а sand (Песок). В лесной области ground. Это сильно влияет на навигацию. Будет вести вело маршрут через озеро по плохой дороге. Спасибо.
Supaplex030 (2022-06-25 18:47:51+00:00): Gibt es Parklets, die nicht "position lane" sind..? Nagut, "street_side" wäre dann natürlich auch möglich. Aber wie Wikipedia definiert, ist es immer parkraumrelevant: "Ein Parklet ist ein Stadtmöbel auf ehemaligen Parkplatzflächen, das den Menschen mittels Aufbauten mehr öffentlichen Raum zur Verfügung stellt."

(finde die position-Ergänzung also eher überflüssig.)
Supaplex030 (2022-06-25 18:53:53+00:00): Achso, und noch ein Gedanke.

Es gibt mMn einen Unterschied zwischen "leisure=parklet" und "leisure=outdoor_seating" + "outdoor_seating=parklet". Ich vermute, du meinst in deinen beiden CS eigentlich letzteres.

"leisure=outdoor_seating" ist das Tagging, was in OSM für Außengastronomie genutzt wird, daher passt das dann hier auch und müsste durch den etablierten Subtag "outdoor_seating" spezifiziert werden.

"leisure=parklet" ist in meinem Verständnis dagegen eine spezielle Bauform von Stadtmöbel/Sitzgruppe auf ehemaligen Stellplatzflächen, die zum Verweilen im öffentlichen Raum gedacht ist, aber nicht gastronomisch genutzt.

Oder um es nochmal anders auszudrücken: bei leisure=parklet steht das Verweilen im Vordergrund, bei leisure=outdoor_seating+* das Essen. Auch wenn beides exakt gleich aussieht.
tordans (2022-06-25 18:58:12+00:00): Gut, dann für dich direkt noch das "street_side" Beispiel https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122847076 https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3053304884925006&focus=photo&lat=52.49689190000001&lng=13.440705099999946&z=17&x=0.8820219710483604&y=0.5400696169162835&zoom=0

Tagging ist mir im Detail aber egal.
Supaplex030 (2022-06-25 21:21:01+00:00): Hey, das ist kein Parklet, sondern ein man_made=planter ;)
MxxCon (2022-06-26 02:40:50+00:00): Hello.
Is there a gate somewhere blocking access to that street?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122846938
Jon_of_Brooklyn (2022-06-26 02:55:42+00:00): Yes. I tried running down this street today but a locked gate prevented every + a “No trespassing” sign.
MxxCon (2022-06-26 03:48:31+00:00): If you remember where the gate was, it would be great to add it as well. 👍
tordans (2022-07-03 19:57:12+00:00): Siehe Diskussion unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122846407
tordans (2022-07-03 19:58:26+00:00): Aktualisiert unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123163568.
emersonveenstra (2022-06-26 13:08:24+00:00): Hi,

`access=yes` is not a correct tag to use on `highway=steps`, see the wiki for more details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=steps#:~:text=Do%20not%20use%20access=yes

Would you mind changing that? Thanks!
RicoElectrico (2022-06-26 11:29:05+00:00): Hej, niestety musiałem to wycofać, bo narysowałeś drogę która nakładała się na wiele istniejących już dróg. To popsułoby nawigację. Jaki był Twój zamiar, żeby móc ew. pomóc wprowadzić to poprawnie?
Aleksander Hugo (2022-07-07 07:22:35+00:00): Z jakiego źródła są nazwy ulic Głośna i Południowa?