piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-01-21 21:22:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
PT-53 (2018-01-22 09:19:36+00:00): Hallo Matthias,
nach Deinen Ergänzungen in Untermarchtal werden in keep right nun diese Hinweise angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=48.20326&lon=9.689&zoom=16&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C50
Schaust Du Dir das mal an ?
.
Ich persönlich bin kein Fan dieser Garagen-Zufahrten. Ich finde das macht die Karte eher unübersichtlicher.
.
Grüße
Matthias Frank (2018-01-25 21:32:49+00:00): Hallo Peter,
ich habe nun dort in Unterstadion die Garagenzufahrten entweder ganz auf das Gebäude gezogen oder, gemäß Deinem Hinweis, dass diese die Karte unübersichtlicher machen, wieder gelöscht, mit Ausnahme von Fällen, in denen die Zufahrten länger sind und vielleicht nicht den erwarteten Verlauf nehmen. Grüße von Matthias
PT-53 (2018-01-26 08:20:41+00:00): Hallo Matthias,
ich zeichne Zufahrten auf Privat-Grundstücken ein, wenn Wohnhäuser oder Betriebe "in der zweiten Reihe" stehen und / oder von der Straße aus nicht sichtbar sind und dann eine Routinganweisung (biegen Sie ..) hilfreich ist. Alle anderen Zufahrten halte ich für überflüssig.
Grüße von Peter
SOSM (2018-01-25 19:46:48+00:00): Hallo gnss und willkommen bei OSM.

Kleine Frage, was für ein Editor verwendest du für deine Edits? Es ist eigentlich Brauch, dass dieser sich in den changeset Tags identifiziert, und das macht deiner nicht.
M!dgard (2018-03-27 12:25:38+00:00): You forgot layer=-1 on the glass wall https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554733351 . It's better to keep stuff on different layers somewhat separate: avoid letting them share nodes except at the connections between layers. (I know, this wasn't done perfectly before.) I've tried to fix the situation here.
Luizhnd (2018-01-22 13:01:56+00:00): Questionei no grupo de editores o uso de área militar, landuse=military, e é bem claro no wiki o uso para forças armadas, como exército, marinha e aeronáutica.
Em caso de PM e bombeiros, me falaram para utilizar amenity=police para PM e amenity=fire_station para Bombeiros, e deram como exemplo amenity=school para o terreno da escola e building=school para o prédio.
Inclusive procurei em outras cidades (Curitiba, São Paulo, Brasília) o uso de área militar para PM e bombeiros e não encontrei.
adrianojbr (2018-01-22 23:35:35+00:00): olá, luiz.

as respostas no grupo do telegram foram:
1. É bom mas não necessário (https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Suporte/26508);
2. Pessoalmente costumo colocar quando há placas indicando "área militar - proibido a entrada". (https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Suporte/26511); e
3. É para áreas militares. Se for polícia militar ou bombeiros militares, pode usar. Se for polícia civil ou bombeiros civis, acho que não faz sentido. (https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Suporte/26512).

nenhuma delas diz que não se pode usar landuse=military para polícia e bombeiros. pelo contrário, a primeira diz que "é bom", a segunda especifica alguns casos onde se usa e a terceira, praticamente, recomenda.

quanto ao wiki, não vejo como o texto "Area used for military purposes" ou "Etiqueta para demarcar uma área utilizada para fins militares, normalmente de acesso restrito ao público" limita a aplicação somente para forças armadas.

se for o mesmo critério de interpretação restritiva para amenity=police diminuiriam muitos os casos onde usar algo que diz "A Wikipedia-16px.png police station is a building where police officers and other staff work and are dispatched from, and where suspects and evidence are collected and processed" ou "Usado para marcar uma delegacia/esquadra de polícia".

sobre o uso, há vários casos onde houve a combinação dessas etiquetas, conforme http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ver.

além disso, no caso específico, o "complexo da polícia militar de santa catarina" inclui vários postos militares (amenity=police e amenity=fire_station), por isso entende, sem sombra de dúvida, que a área maior deve ser landuse=military.
Luizhnd (2018-01-23 14:10:27+00:00): Está certo então, eu havia interpretado de outra forma.
Alexander-II (2018-01-22 06:33:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/3089276 для истории: откуда пошел omkum и sorting_name
PlaneMad (2018-02-05 23:21:34+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55638950
gscholz (2018-01-22 05:46:34+00:00): Hola,
this changeset has broken several relations:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-78.10305&lat=-2.19316&zoom=10&opacity=0.70

Can you please fix this?

Perdone por escribir en inglés, pero mi castellan es muy mal.
Saludos de Alemania
Guido
neuhausr (2018-01-23 16:50:58+00:00): Hi, I am an area mapper, wondering why this POI got flagged for removal of data for advertising? Aside from not having the leisure=tanning_salon tag, it seems like legitimate data, and doesn't have a lot of the "description" garbage like a lot of SEO spam does.
woodpeck (2018-01-23 21:04:19+00:00): I am investigating a pattern where a SEO firm has created a single account for each of their clients, and used that account to add one POI only, and added that POI with a focus on getting the business name and website URL into OSM, without respecting OSM customs (often using spammy descriptions; not specifying an amenity/shop/office/... tag; adding a suite number to the addr:street tag). It is true that I *could* have guessed the leisure=tanning_salon from the name or looked up the URL given, but I felt that it is not my job to help the SEO company earn their money. In my mind, a POI that is just there to get a business name on the map is advertising. But I am making this edit as a private individual and not as a member of the OSMF data working group and if you, as a local mapper, would rather have the old node back then I'm happy to revert, or let you revert.
neuhausr (2018-01-23 22:01:29+00:00): Fair enough, I monitor this area and I've certainly seen plenty of obvious SEO spam! However, if a business owner wants to get their business name in OSM, I hope it won't get flagged for removal just because they used their business name for their account and only did one badly tagged node. Note, I don't know if that is the case with this particular node, but it seems like a slippery slope.
freebeer (2018-01-24 11:33:55+00:00): Hi neuhausr,
Refer to the initial changeset, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41861684 .
There you see the particular edit was questioned by Georg but no reply was given, in over a  year.
If this were to have been a legitimate business playing by OSM rules, they would have been interested enough to actually participate by replying, and would have been given tips on how to improve their edit.
There are other signatures that map-abusers leave behind, that a Real User may or may not make the same mistakes, that I also see in this particular original edit.
Hope this allays your worries about trigger-happy trashing of true truth, at least a bit.
neuhausr (2018-01-24 15:15:22+00:00): good point, I'd missed that
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-07 21:37:46+00:00): porque 3?
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-01-22 08:06:58+00:00): Kolego, co to za bzdury tutaj natworzyłeś? Przypisałeś adresy w Śliwicach do Otmuchowa? Domyślam się, że chodzi o to, że zostały nazwane ulice w Śliwicach, ale zrobiłeś to źle.
Jason Harrison (2018-01-22 02:15:20+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55639876
R0bst3r (2018-01-22 12:33:31+00:00): Hallo zichwi,
ich habe deine Änderungen gereviewt. Sieht gut aus.
Viele Grüße
borishag (2018-01-22 15:41:22+00:00): Please Undo you changes to ICI PARIS XL, (Node istead of Way)  Our shop is now unfindable, and more importantly it doesn't contain an essential geo-location in this case lat="50.4564270" lon="3.9324662"

Please note that all our shops Including Kruidvat are Nodes .

B. Hageman, Editor AS Watson Stores
b.hageman@nl.aswatson.com
OSMDoudou (2018-01-22 18:06:10+00:00): Not findable by whom and where ? I'm asking before it's findable in OpenStreetMap.org: https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Mons%20ICI%20Paris%20XL#map=19/50.45646/3.93246. I'm asking also because mapping a shop as area is preferred over mapping it as a node because an area can capture the entire surface where the commercial activity is conducted (e.g. the terrasse of a pub) which a node cannot represent. See the Buildings paragraph in the Wiki page on Shops: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Shops#Buildings. I'd like to better understand the issue you're experiencing because I wouldn't like to be constrained in mapping places more accurately based on a problem I don't understand.
OSMDoudou (2018-01-22 18:06:50+00:00): Typo: before -> because
OSMDoudou (2018-01-22 18:26:27+00:00): As a courtesy and awaiting your input to clarify the issue, I re-created a node with the shop information: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5355126785.
borishag (2018-01-23 15:55:40+00:00): Thank you for restoring our shop. All AS Watson Stores Are created as Nodes. Our goal is to update all our shop information according to our company guidelines. This project started with our Benelux branch and covers over 1700 stores in NL, B, F, L,D. Also Rossmann Chemists (all countries)  and Marionnaud Perfumeries (all countries) will be updated this way. A global format will be used, similar to the way shops and buildings are named in The Neths. All AS Watson Shops in Belgium are now present as a node; ICI PARIS XL-120,  Kruidvat-252. Since our start in 2016 we never encountered any problems with this issue. Vital for us is that a node always conatins a geo-location.
B. Hageman
OSMDoudou (2018-01-24 19:47:15+00:00): I raised this to the attention of the OSM Tagging mailing list: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-January/034974.html. There may be an easy way out, but we'd need to understand how it works at your side, so I'd like to ask you join the discussion there to expose the problem you're facing and see how we can resolve it.
escada (2018-01-25 13:36:12+00:00): borishag, I think I have seen a similar discussion with you not so long ago about another store that "disappeared" for you. 
We provided solutions with Overpass I think that should overcome your problem.

Please review your workflow and accept that shops can be mapped as node and areas.
borishag (2018-01-25 13:50:47+00:00): We do have several shops in Malls in Belgium, e.g. Anderlecht-Cora, where there is only one housenumber, there are no unit numbers. Also we do have a number of so called "Shop-in-Shop" Stores that cannot be handled in the way you are suggesting. how should we handle these stores instead?
escada (2018-01-25 13:57:41+00:00): You query should obtain both ways and nodes from OSM. Overpass allows such queries. It can even calculate the middle of ways for your convenience, so you only obtain nodes.
Otherwise the software on your side can still do that.

The software that I use (OsmAnd, MagicEarth, maps.me, etc. etc.) can all cope with the fact that POIs are represented by nodes, ways and (sometimes) relations. 

It will be less time consuming for you and the mappers involved to adapt your software.

Here is the Overpass query http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/vmD you can execute. In this case I limited it to a bounding box, but it can be adapted to run world wide (taking more time then of course)
Glenn Plas (2018-01-25 13:59:33+00:00): Sure they can be handled, you can easily mark a node as an entrance, but since you keep on trying to put this data on ways, you are in essence creating this problem for yourself.  There does not NEED to be a 1 on 1 relation with a shop and a house, there are many cases where addresses are shared by multiple shops.  But the thing is: you are changing the data to better accommodate your broken tools, that don't seem quite up for the job since they can't seem to handle the most basic node.   This is not how it works, you should fix your toolset, get it fixed, escalate it , where or to who you need to escalate it to to stop this editing madness.    You're not alone in OSM.
OSMDoudou (2018-02-04 17:41:22+00:00): @borishag Can you update us on your (company's) plans to handle shops as areas ? Thx. Should assistance be needed, the community will gladly help.
borishag (2018-02-06 13:02:29+00:00): We will only change nodes to area's if the majority of all other shops are done. Now in Belgium There are for Perfumeries only 12 areas and 283 nodes, for Chemsits 5 areas and 141 nodes. We think that untill that is done by the community we will have the time to work out a solution. In the meanwhile we think that the community should give us more flexibility, as we are one of the first company's that are keeping theirshops up-to-date in OSM.
OSMDoudou (2018-02-06 20:46:08+00:00): The start of the response ("We will only... if...") sounds obtuse, but the rest shows openness, so I'm happy and supportive. With that said, you better already prepare your plans, because converting a good 200 nodes to areas is not a challenge. :-)
SomeoneElse2 (2018-01-25 20:22:21+00:00): The change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4982670096/history isn't exactly a spelling error, is it?  It's changing it from one tag to another.
thetornado76 (2018-01-25 20:34:20+00:00): Ok spelling Error is Not the correct wording. I had changed this, because boat_hire was only 3x used and boat_rental is the documented Tag for Boat rentals.
Jason Harrison (2018-01-22 02:15:07+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55640331
viloan (2018-01-21 23:18:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
aceman444 (2018-02-08 20:50:41+00:00): Dobry den, na jednom mieste sa nesmu prekryvat viacere cesty a este k tomu s roznymi typmi. Mozu sa krizovat, ist vedla seba ak je taka realita, ale nie ist paralelne a na sebe.  Urobili ste to napriklad na chodniku way 167626015, way 230557367 a way 167626020 .
Zalitoar (2018-01-22 13:46:23+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55641099
Felipe Alves (2018-01-22 15:24:14+00:00): Oi, Rodolfo. Tudo bem?

Vi que adicionou este ponto aqui, mas o que queria representar? Pesquisei sobre algum loja com este nome que colocou, mas não encontrei nada... Qualquer dúvida, fico a disposição.

Abs
abakus_uploader (2018-01-22 23:31:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897 - tam również proszę zadawać ewentualne pytania.
Pozdrawiamy!
Zalitoar (2018-01-22 13:46:20+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55641363
maraf24 (2018-01-22 09:23:19+00:00): "Park profesora Gerarda Labudy"
Profesora powinno być dużą literą:)
RicoElectrico (2018-01-22 10:43:54+00:00): W iMPA / TERYT jest nawet "prof." ;-)

Możesz poprawić, jeśli chcesz.
maraf24 (2018-01-22 11:16:05+00:00): W TERYT jest dobrze:) Skróty piszemy małą literą.
Zalitoar (2018-01-22 13:46:10+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55641441
viloan (2018-01-22 01:43:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
CharliePlett (2018-01-23 04:34:11+00:00): Most people call this Chetumal Street but I recently found evidence that the South side of the street is LIB and the north side is Chetumal Street.
mike140 (2018-01-22 07:30:01+00:00): Объясните, пожалуйста, зачем Вы нарисовали сервисный проезд от Покровской площади до собора?
mike140 (2018-01-22 07:32:09+00:00): И на Воскресенской тоже
OSMGuardian1 (2018-05-13 23:12:14+00:00): Bing could not have been the source for one of the areas mapped here may I ask how you used Esri World Imagery to map out the Chipotle and surrounding area?
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 05:43:49+00:00): 道路名称不适用描述
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 09:00:43+00:00): 不要添加不存在的道路：西三环
lh11019 (2018-01-26 00:56:52+00:00): stop being a cunt
HYPERseal (2018-01-26 01:29:16+00:00): Maybe try using the map responsibly then?
muralito (2018-01-22 21:27:15+00:00): Por favor, revisa lo que mapeaste de La Fontana. La agregaste como algo que no es https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=wilderness hut
muralito (2018-01-22 21:27:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=wilderness_hut
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 09:02:27+00:00): 未建设好的铁道不适用railway=rail的标签
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 09:02:21+00:00): 未建设好的铁道不适用railway=rail的标签
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 09:02:16+00:00): 未建设好的铁道不适用railway=rail的标签
GOwin (2018-01-22 03:05:42+00:00): re blocked roads, are these confirmed by yourself?

If these are highways blocked by informal occupation, consider adding barrier=yes in end nodes, and add access:motorcar=no (or a more restrictive access:motor_vehicle=no) in the linear way, while keeping the appropriate highway tag (i.e highway=residential)
GOwin (2018-01-22 03:06:40+00:00): This are especially important for roads, but could apply to streets, as well.
Rally (2018-01-22 03:24:39+00:00): I did not add additional access tags (that has to be verified). But with fair degree of certainty (from newer imagery), the edge of roofs of houses on the street occupied by informal settlers won't permit vehicles to pass thru (to err on the side of safety). Instead, the affected street polygons with these occupants were tagged with landuse=residential. By the way it looked, they will stay there for the next few years, until they are demolished or resettled somewhere)
GOwin (2018-01-22 05:56:57+00:00): please add your note=* or description=* to the feature itself.
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 09:02:10+00:00): 未建设好的铁道不适用railway=rail的标签
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 06:01:42+00:00): 未建设好的铁道不适用railway=rail的标签
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 06:01:31+00:00): 未建设好的铁道不适用railway=rail的标签
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 06:02:08+00:00): 未建设好的铁道不适用railway=rail的标签
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 06:02:01+00:00): 未建设好的铁道不适用railway=rail的标签
JJIglesias (2018-01-22 04:07:14+00:00): Buen Trabajo
garx91 (2018-01-23 18:11:42+00:00): Muchas gracias.
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 06:01:52+00:00): 未建设好的铁道不适用railway=rail的标签
Vulcanodong (2018-01-22 06:01:11+00:00): 未建设好的铁道不适用railway=rail的标签
JayTurnr (2018-02-20 01:42:18+00:00): This building was always present, are you sure you don't mean the building just east of this, which was the extension built roughly, if I recall correctly, 2015?
Josh Tilley (2018-02-23 13:35:39+00:00): You’re right, the extension is the most recent construction, however I have personally been in the Achieve building after the extension and renovation, and it is definitely the westernmost of the two - it’s possible that the 2015 extension is named Achieve also.
JayTurnr (2018-02-24 16:21:53+00:00): I'm a little unsure. I'll try to get a hold of a up to date internal map. I've not been in campus in a number of years.