piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
manoharuss (2017-04-28 08:42:23+00:00): Hi jrmiller,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But this does not like a building, can you remove the building tag from the polygon and maybe improve on the shape.


Thank you.

Manohar
manoharuss (2017-04-28 08:43:41+00:00): Hi jrmiller,

Building tag from this church as well. If the area is church grounds, amenity=place_of_worship is sufficient.

Thank you,

Manohar
manoharuss (2017-04-28 09:21:52+00:00): Hi areytor,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But is this an indoor swimming pool? seems like a building in imagery. If it is an indoor swimming pool, please add indoor tag. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool

Thanks,

Manohar
mueschel (2017-05-03 08:45:44+00:00): Hi,
could you check this tagging? Is Frailes the name?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171545533

Cheers, Jan
Federico Explorador (2017-05-03 14:43:25+00:00): Hi Jan,

I think it is "Fraile", according to IGAC maps, but I have no field evidence for the rivers name.
mueschel (2017-05-04 10:24:11+00:00): Alright. I'll change the tag "Fraile = Fraile" to "name = Fraile".
GinaroZ (2017-04-27 23:45:22+00:00): Hi welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit. Just wondering, what exactly is "St Gregory's"? Because it doesn't look like a park.
Kori151 (2017-05-01 20:46:50+00:00): It is not a play park with swings & such but it is a natural green area with trees that children play on, people walk their dogs, bonfires are held here and dirt bikes are ridden. It is an area where Birds, foxes and endangered water voles call home.
nammala (2017-04-28 05:45:05+00:00): Hi AT84,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world and every data is very valuable. May I know the reason behind deleting highways and also adding `waterway=pond` to the `park` tag is not a valid one. Could you please make those changes please.

regards,
nammala
AT84 (2017-04-28 06:28:56+00:00): Nammala, 
I very much do understand that every piece of data is valuable to OSM, which is why I'm providing it with the latest data of the Village of Maxwell. I am on the local board as a landscaper, and the board has recently been asking, "How can we get word out about Maxwell?", so updating the OSM was my idea, along with other ideas that are in place as of now on other websites & shooting for businesses openings. As of now, and some time, those "highways", which were merely paths around the pond, have been barricaded off. The rain made it too muddy around there & several people have gotten stuck, so we contacted the state & as a safety precaution they barricaded the path on the north side of the pond, just south a few meters of West Maxwell Road. As for the paths that went south, I have corrected those as they are driveways to residences, and I wouldn't want people driving up to their house at night possibly blaring music & trying to throw a little late night park party, as it has happened once before on the South side of the pond. 

How can I correctly fix the tags? Remove the waterway=pond? My reasoning was as it is a park & rec, its main feature was the pond. Most people use Boot Lake (the alternative/local name, rather than the states name for the park) for boating in the summer, swimming, fishing or tubing. I currently only have access to my mobile phone, and received the email, but I will try to get everything fixed by morning. I have a busy day, but also have the upmost respect for OSM & it's free services. If I can't get it done tomorrow, I've set reminders for Monday at the latest.

Regards, 
VoM.
nammala (2017-04-28 06:46:56+00:00): Thanks AT84 for getting back . Like the way you have mentioned each and every point clearly. Happy mapping.
Let me know if I can help you in any way.

Best Regards,
nammala
freebeer (2017-04-28 19:25:59+00:00): Hi.  Maxwell?  Hmmm.
I'm taking a look at the area to see if I can help, and how I can avoid doing too much damage.
If the roads/paths are presently impassable due to rain, I would not delete anything, but at best, mark with appropriate access tags.  After all, I spend a lot of time in the sun at a spot which the latest aerial imagery shows as a metre or two under water.
I will see if I can make sense of the water, and what might be wetlands in the aerial imagery.  Please note that I'm almost halfway around the world so I will of course defer to local knowledge.
Anyway, take a look at how various areas in Europe are mapped to see the sort of detail I will strive to give to Maxwell, depending how I interpret the imagery.
And thanks for your contribution, and motivating me to do, um... something...
freebeer (2017-04-28 22:33:11+00:00): I know it's rude to reply to myself, but here are my thoughts:
The roads should not have been deleted, but instead retagged as not-residential.  They look like the paths I walk to my Sometimes-Underwater Spot.  Which paths are, at times, impassable for me, but that is not marked as such.  At other times, like the rain-free month before this rainy week, no problems.
I will attempt to restore the original paths and tag them -- they were bulk-imported from TIGER data, and, well, if anyone in the USA attempts to blindly navigate by TIGER data in OSM, woe be unto them.
Speaking of woe, I took a look around Maxwell and tweaked a few things with the sports pitches, so they now appear, although not with markings added (yet), a detail of no concern to you.
I did see a pile-up of nodes along with the Maxwell name, including a Post Office, two churches, and a fire department.  The last you had modified; all four were imports that ended up in the same place nowhere near their real positions (I hope).  I've separated them to see what all they were, so you can move them more readily to their actual locations.
I have added to the lake, with a few incomplete boundaries that I have to figure out how to tag as wetlands or scrub or something.
Mappy Happing...
hca (2017-04-30 20:36:52+00:00): Moin Noralinda.
Ich habe gesehen, daß Du neulich in Deizisau Adresskorrekturen vorgenommen hast. Das ist soweit auch gut (vor allem, was die falschen Straßennamen betrifft -- Buchen-/Ahornweg --, die ich verbockt habe), aber mit Deinem Tagging im Eschenweg: "addr:housenumber=1 u. 3" bin ich nicht einverstanden.
Entweder hättest Du das Gebäude aufteilen können und dann an jeden der Teile eine Hausnummer taggen (sieht so aus, als hättest Du das erfolglos versucht und dann die Überbleibsel Deines Versuchs nicht wieder aufgeräumt), oder Du hättest in den bestehenden Gebäudeumriß Nodes setzen und diese dann mit den Adressangaben versehen können.
Deine Variante ist aber definitiv falsch.
-- Ähnliches habe ich übrigens heute in Plochingen entdeckt.

Nix für Ungut
Hartwig
fx99 (2018-11-04 05:24:02+00:00): Are you sure,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258954896/history#map=19/48.70144/9.31589 has 2 housenumbers? 
Same house 4 u. 4|1 !
MichaelNonya (2017-04-28 00:58:09+00:00): Correction to note: this is the western side of Bill Yeck
manoharuss (2017-04-28 08:30:43+00:00): Hi Redpon,


Welcome to OpenStreeMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But this does not seem like a single building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/489964529. But if this is church grounds, can you please remove the building tag from this polygon. amenity=place_of_worship is sufficient.


Thank you,

Manohar
nammala (2017-05-04 06:55:13+00:00): Hi SEEPANA SUNEETHA,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have added buildings without tagging them. It would be great if you can tag them. 
Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Regards,
nammala
ma-rt-in (2017-04-28 08:53:29+00:00): hi warum hast du am gebäude building und an der POI das amenity=bureau_de_change entfernt?
Eduard Popov (2017-05-02 05:33:18+00:00): Что-то здесь не то сделано. Почему пешеходная дорожка слиплась с дорогой, добавилась линия без тегов. Исправьте, пожалуйста.
Polarbear (2017-06-03 14:10:23+00:00): Hier ist wieder eine Teilfäche des großen Rudolph-Wilde-Park auf 'park' gesetzt. 
Als grosse Grasfläche auf landuse=grass + landcover=grass korrigiert.
muralito (2017-04-28 21:43:00+00:00): Hola Juan Manuel.
Algo no te esta quedando bien con el mapeo, porque instalaciones militares las esta mapeando como campings.
Explicame que intentas mapear y veo como te puedo ayudar.
pitscheplatsch (2017-04-29 07:23:54+00:00): Hi Rasyid Azhar, welcome to OSM. Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48214118
mavl (2018-12-25 21:07:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:02:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:29:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:15:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
manoharuss (2017-04-28 06:21:11+00:00): Hi Ying Zhong,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. I am afraid the building you drew is too big. It might be a neighborhood or a locality. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Neighbourhood, landuse=residential can be a more general way to describe the area https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential.


Let me know what you think.

Happy Mapping!!!

Best,

Manohar
Ying Zhong (2017-04-29 16:20:59+00:00): Hi Manohar,
(Not sure if this message will get to you. I'm 2 days old to OpenStreetMap...). Thanks for pointing that out! Sorry that I was confused by the concepts here. Yes I agree with you. This is a complex neighborhood consisting of multiple apartment buildings. 

Thanks,
Ying
mavl (2018-12-25 21:12:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:51:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:42:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:41:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:27:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:41:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
MichaelSteffen (2017-04-28 08:19:43+00:00): Hello Alvar - The ponds you added here appear to be green spaces in satellite imagery. Did you intend to add them as parks instead of ponds?
imperialmog (2017-04-28 04:26:52+00:00): I might be able to help improve this park and some of the nearby area since its near my work and could stop there for lunch and be able to fill in more details.
laxin1914 (2017-04-28 05:06:16+00:00): Great! Thanks for the help!
imperialmog (2017-04-28 10:14:02+00:00): No problem. I see this park along my commute and know of a few other features in the area. You can see too some added detail i did a few days ago in and near Des Peres Park.
manoharuss (2017-04-28 07:38:28+00:00): Hi danielponks,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But I have found few issues with some of your mapped objects. Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61015388/history seems like a building. can you correct these?


Thank you,

Manohar
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 13:51:28+00:00): In unlikely case that you still remember or can visit this place...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32869623/history

surface=cobbled? What you meant by that? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=cobblestone?uselang=en
woowoowoo (2023-03-21 00:33:25+00:00): Ah, whoops. You're right, it should have been cobblestone!
Many Melbourne lanes have basalt cobblestone (approx 25x35cm) surface.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 07:13:27+00:00): and even bettter: surface=sett or surface=unhewn_cobblestone to be more specific
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-05-01 14:22:06+00:00): Bom dia Vital, Bem vindo ao openstreetmap. Não se deve colar áreas a vias como aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490003861
manoharuss (2017-04-28 08:26:52+00:00): Hi Zahid Bhatti,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. May I suggest using amenity=bank +building=yes tags on banks such as this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490004746/history. You have added really good information but amenity information can only be in amenity tag.


Feel free to reply.

Thank you,

Manohar
prakashh (2017-04-28 06:19:12+00:00): rajipur community lies in bardiya district
mavl (2017-04-28 16:38:19+00:00): Здравствуйте. Даты в OSM пишут в формате год-месяц-день: 2017-06-01
vvk123 (2017-04-28 17:57:30+00:00): Поправил, спасибо.
prakashh (2017-04-28 06:18:28+00:00): Rajipur community lies in Bardiya District.
highflyer74 (2017-04-30 11:40:26+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist.

Ist die Bank in diesem Gebäude noch vorhanden...? Wenn nicht sollten die entsprechenden Daten vom Gebäude entfernt werden. Ich kann das gern für Dich machen, deshalb melde Dich bitte kurz.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, bei OSM mitzuarbeiten, würde ich Dir empfehlen, einen richtigen Editor wie iD oder am besten JOSM zu verwenden. Maps.Me ist zum Editieren keine gute Idee, da es nicht den aktuellen Stand der Datenbank abbildet und es somit oft zu Doppeleintragungen und anderen Problemen kommt (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits). Für Android kann ich den Editor Vespucci empfehlen.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
highflyer74 (2017-05-30 15:24:52+00:00): Hallo! Leider hast Du auch nach einem Monat nicht auf meine Nachfrage geantwortet. Ich möchte Dich darauf hinweisen, daß OSM ein kollaboratives Projekt ist, das nur durch Kommunikation zwischen den Teilnehmern funktioniert. Deshalb wird erwartet, daß man auf Nachrichten, die einen erreichen auch antwortet...
highflyer74 (2017-08-14 15:56:53+00:00): Da sich "Her Wollme" nicht meldet, habe ich die Bank jetzt entfernt und die zwei OSM Notes auf erledigt gesetzt.
Miselajus (2017-04-28 10:16:07+00:00): Hallo,
da könnte sich aber manch ein waldeckischer Lokalpatriot "auf den Schlips" getreten fühlen, wenn du all deine Änderungssätze im ehemaligen Fürstentum Waldeck mit dem Kommentar ´Marsberg gemappt´ versiehst,
Gruß Miselajus
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-28 12:06:17+00:00): [San Pedro, Laguna] revert edit to Estrella (2nd time)
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-28 12:07:04+00:00): [Muntinlupa and Makati] add building heights and new/missing POI's
Glassman (2017-04-28 15:42:23+00:00): You might want to add a tag to FoodLifeLine to describe the business. For example,  office=ngo or office=charity. Check wiki.openstreetmap.org for help finding the correct tag
gpstracks (2017-04-28 16:33:30+00:00): Buongiorno.
Se intende "Delle Case Sport", il negozio si è traasferito in Via Taboga 212 da qualche anno.
eggie (2017-04-28 10:14:54+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-04-28 10:16:46+00:00): Een naam is helaas niet genoeg de aard van het bedrijf zou er log bij moeten. 
Kijk even hier bij de kaarteigenschappen..
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen
eggie (2017-04-28 10:17:12+00:00): PB gestuurd
Virgil Ciebrant | OldeKalter (2017-04-28 11:38:02+00:00): Aard van bedrijf is toegevoegd
pitscheplatsch (2017-04-29 07:25:10+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48241541
manoharuss (2017-04-28 08:20:55+00:00): Hi rit秀,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But from satellite imagery, this area https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490039512/history seems like a parking lot. If this is actually a supermarket on the ground, please ignore my comment. But if it is parking lot, can you change the feature to amenity=parking. 

Feel free to reply.

Thanks,

Manohar
SomeoneElse (2017-07-09 10:26:19+00:00): Hello,
Just wondering the reasoning behind "castle_type=defensive" on Bolsover Castle?  Whilst it's true that the original castle here was defensive, what's here now is essentially just a country house.  As your source wikipedia says, "the castle was designed for elegant living rather than defence".  The Little Castle does look a _bit_ like a castle, as was the fashion of the time, but wasn't in any way defensive.
Incidentally, strictly speaking Wikipedia isn't a suitable source for OSM - it's CC-by-SA licensed, and in theory demands attribution from data consumers that OSM can't guarantee.
Best Regards,
Andy
jaap de vries (2017-05-04 10:21:10+00:00): Hoi Wim,

Ik zie dat je hier een bus hebt neergezet die anoniem aangeeft. Heb jij deze ter plekke gecontroleerd? Anoniem maakt vaak fouten bij het plaatsen van dit soort notes.
Op de postnl site zie ik dat hier geen bus te vinden is https://www.postnl.nl/locatiewijzer/#/?centerLat=51.517552853931114&centerLng=4.469349399509626&locationid=BBN_10050271&zoom=15 
ook op cyclomediabeeld geen bus.
Kan je me uitleggen waarom je hier een bus hebt neergezet, dit geldt ook voor andere bussen in Roosendaal.

Jaap
Hjart (2017-04-28 08:15:22+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig at ændre dette tilbage, som det var (se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shelter_type%3Dlean_to)
Hjart (2017-04-28 08:20:46+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Bemærk at jeg har redigeret stort set alle dine bidrag indtil nu og at det måde shelteret var tagget på var den korrekte
DD1GJ (2017-04-28 08:51:32+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetmap. Die Namensvergabe an Häusern entspricht nicht der üblichen Vorgehensweise bei OpenStreetMap und wirkt auf der Karte wie Graffiti. Der Größe nach sind das keine Häuser sondern total schiefe Grundstücke in Neubaugebieten. Was ist Deine Datenquelle? Sind da überhaupt schon Häuser gebaut? Einige vielleicht, aber bestimmt nicht alle.
SafwatHalaby (2017-04-28 08:59:05+00:00): You used name:en for a Hebrew name.
rene78 (2017-05-04 07:12:53+00:00): Strange, that Central is much larger here on OSM compared to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regions_of_Singapore. I wonder who is right?
woodennature (2017-05-04 07:25:29+00:00): I wasn't the one who drew the district boundaries. If possible, I would have deleted the district lines because they are not reflected in the postal code but it would discount the effort of the previous person who drew the boundaries. I referred to this: https://www.cdc.org.sg/centralsingapore

Please feel free to rectify any issues. Thanks for highlighting that!
SafwatHalaby (2017-04-28 09:00:25+00:00): Hello. This is not a Hebrew name, but  you added it under "name:he"
oli-f (2017-04-28 09:21:05+00:00): Du hast hier mehrere von mir gemappten Gebäude gelöscht, die aber in der Realität existieren (Quelle: vor Ort 17.02.2017). Darf ich fragen, was der Grund dafür ist?
Bitte beachte, dass die Bilder von BING meist mehr als 2 Jahre alt und somit nicht immer die Realität widerspiegeln.
DD1GJ (2017-04-28 09:41:27+00:00): Da malt jemand in großem Stil und schlechter Qualität Pi mal Daumen irgendwelche Bebauungspläne ab ...
priyaboya (2019-04-29 13:22:45+00:00): Hi Randy Febri Nanda,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 31507425 and way 490060503 as 'Tertiary'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'
As of now correcting the data.Please suggest if it is otherwise

Thanks in advance.
opendcc (2017-04-29 09:00:15+00:00): Hallo,

Du hast da einen längeren Track rausgelöscht und mit Fehlern an ähnlicher Stelle wieder eingezeichnet. Ich vermute mal, das war nicht Absicht. Was wolltest Du erreichen?

Servus Wolfgang
baerli23 (2017-04-29 09:51:27+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang,
grundsätzlich wollte ich Wege im Mauracher Holz ergänzen. Die Änderungen sind aber in OSM noch nicht aktualisiert. In manchen Zoomstufen aber zum Teil schon. Kann da etwas schief gehen?
Ist es möglich eine Änderung wieder rückgängig zu machen?
Wo sind Fehler in meiner Änderung?
Gruß,
Thomas
opendcc (2017-04-29 11:25:42+00:00): Hallo, Thomas,

> grundsätzlich wollte ich Wege im Mauracher Holz ergänzen.

Das ist prima und Du bist herzlich willkommen. Das mit der Aktualisierung funktioniert so: Du trägst einen Weg in die Datenbank ein (bitte immer möglichst mit allen wichtigen Parametern wie Oberflächenbeschaffenheit (tracktype)), irgendwann werden aus diese Linien dann Kartenbilder errechnet - das geht im Hintergrund und kann je nach 'Wichtigkeit' des Abschnittes dauern. Das Rechnen erfolgt in sog. Kachel (Vierecke) und auch öfter in hohen Zoomstufen.

Die Änderung mit dem gelöschten Weg versuche ich mal 'sanft' (d.h. möglich viel von Dir behalten) zurückzunehmen. Und zu den Fehlern bzw. was besser geht unterhalten wir uns dann jeweils einzeln.

Servus Wolfgang