piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2014-11-27 23:42:53+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Just for info, I think that something has gone a bit wrong in a couple of your changesets.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314396864 in this one seems to have no tags on it - maybe it was drawn by mistake?

Also http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3205949802 seems to be exactly over the top of another node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3202766974 , and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3205949795 is on top of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3205949796 (which also needs another tag besides "name" to say what it is).

Anyway - hope you don't mind me mentioning this, just trying to help.

Andy (SomeoneElse)
trigpoint (2014-11-25 11:41:48+00:00): I assume your business is not actually in the middle of the road.
You should add a new node, or trace the building, where it actually is.
trigpoint (2014-11-26 12:45:10+00:00): No response, so reverting
agsochi (2014-11-27 20:28:33+00:00): Вы находитесь прямо на тротуаре? :)
SomeoneElse (2014-11-27 23:27:33+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap

Please be aware that OSM is a public database - everything that you delete in here is deleted for everyone.

For example, this church:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203584103/history

was deleted by your first changeset.  I've restored it, and have also removed some of the "doodles" that you added later.

If you want to practice editing things but don't want yo do it on the live server, then I'd suggest that you make an account on http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ and edit there.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend.
*Martin* (2015-02-08 21:06:33+00:00): Ahoj cetus19

Podarilo sa ti spravit z administrativnej hranice lesnu cestu. Opravujem to naspat.

Prosim but opatrny ked nieco editujes a ku kazdej tvojej zmene (changesetu) pridavaj popis. V pripade otazok pis na SK forum osm_sk@googlegroups.com

Pekny vecer.
GerdP (2015-10-12 16:00:25+00:00): please review:
way 314279561  and way 314279559
seem not to be connected, but OSM shows a connection at node 3204479902.
way 314279559 has invalid tag
highway=unclassified;track
aseerel4c26 (2014-11-25 17:46:31+00:00): Einfach mal ... Danke! Auch für die gute Doku!
*Martin* (2014-11-25 15:14:46+00:00): Ahoj cetus19

Prosim pridavaj k svojim zmenam komentar (popis).
cetus19 (2014-11-25 15:34:52+00:00): Ok, nie je problem. Zakreslil som kratku cestu, chodnik, ku jednemu krizu. No nevidel som zmysel ju tam nechavat.
*Martin* (2014-11-25 15:35:56+00:00): Nemyslel som iba tuto zmenu (changeset) ale vseobecne :-)
cetus19 (2014-11-25 15:52:24+00:00): Pochopil som :) Netusil som, ze takto podrobne sledujes vsetky zmeny (mozno iba tie bez komentov :).
*Martin* (2014-11-25 15:53:35+00:00): Musia byt ludia co kontroluju zmeny lebo casto najma novacikovia vedia spravit vela skod.
cetus19 (2014-11-25 15:58:26+00:00): To je pravda. Viackrat som si vsimol, ze nechtiac zmazat nieco v editore nie je problem :) Je super, ze nieco take ako je freemap na SK funguje. Chvalim vas vsetkych, co sa o to starate.
*Martin* (2014-11-25 16:00:31+00:00): Vdaka. Inac na serioznejsiu pracu odporucam JOSM editor map namiesto toho weboveho - iD.
cetus19 (2014-11-25 16:03:07+00:00): Dakujem za tip, pozriem na to.
RoadGeek_MD99 (2016-01-20 00:45:14+00:00): This node appears to be for India, not Virginia, USA.  Can you move it?  Thanks.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-28 21:52:45+00:00): I think that something went a bit wrong with this changeset - one of the nodes was at latitude 0, longitude 0.  I've deleted it.
eggie (2019-12-05 11:36:18+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-01 11:46:05+00:00): Kurze Frage: Was soll so ein Abbiegeverboteverhau wie um http://osm.org/node/53275425 herum bezwecken? Alle Fahrzeuge (einschließlich Fahrrädern) dürfen also ausschließlich geradeaus fahren? Hier scheinen sich ja mehrere Mapper darin überbieten zu wollen, wer mehr TRs setzen kann. Schau dir mal spaßeshalber das Fahrradrouting in OsmAnd an der Stelle an.
MKnight (2018-03-01 12:23:15+00:00): Moin,
bin ich überfragt, ich hab an der Stelle an der nächsten Kreuzung östlich turn:lanes hinzugefügt. Ich nehme an, dass ich durch splitten der Strasse einen Teil der Relationen "geerbt" habe. Ersteller der Relationen ist, wenn ich das richtig sehe, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26933224
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-01 12:31:03+00:00): Dann sorry. Ich hab nur die eine aufgemacht, und da warst du als Ersteller drin.
MKnight (2018-03-01 12:43:57+00:00): Moin,
ich finde an der Stelle keine Relation, die ich erstellt habe; einziges v1 von mir ist: w314413617 (strasse gesplittet).

Ich habe jetzt mal bei mapillary geschaut, von Osten her gibt es keine Beschränkungen, von Westen her nicht nach links. 
Was auf/aus den Wirtschaftswegen ausgeschildert ist, kann man nicht erkennen.
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-01 13:17:02+00:00): Dann hab ich wohl irrtümlich eine Way-History herangezogen. Entschuldigung!
lezurdis (2014-11-25 22:59:39+00:00): Olá,

Tens que fazer cuidado quando desenhas building : é as paredes da casa que desenhamos e para uma rua é o meio da rua que desenhamos, por isso não podes ter nós em comum nem uma casa que se sobrepoe com uma estrada.

Por exemplo aqui :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314417720

E um way building representa uma casa e uma só, não podes colocar um quadrado a volta de 10 casas e dizer que é só  building.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-27 10:33:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204958131/history - zdjęcie tu bicycle=yes było błędne 

ruch rowerowy jest tu nadal legalny

poprawiłem
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-27 10:34:45+00:00): Chyba że wtedy nie było tu podniesienia do 70?
ndmystko (2024-05-27 15:05:55+00:00): Pewnie było ale nie przemyślałem do końca. Na innych odcinkach, bliżej stadionu, jest chyba poniżej 2m ale na tamtym jest szeroko. Dzięki za poprawkę.
Maxime Résibois (2014-11-26 09:49:51+00:00): Bonjour, pour info, vous aviez oublié de nommer les 2 petits bouts de la rue des Incas que vous venez d'ajouter (je l'ai fait du coup) ;-)
Hjart (2014-11-25 18:40:02+00:00): boat=yes på Tornebjerggårdsvej ?!?
edilqueirozdearaujo (2014-11-25 14:23:44+00:00): Confirmar se a Rua José Inácio é realmente dividida ao meio por canteiro central
GerdP (2015-10-31 19:21:36+00:00): please review node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3204688856
Maybe you wanted to change the way to
highway=living_street ?
ma-rt-in (2014-11-25 19:46:20+00:00): Warum sind die Spuren getrennt?
Mosel-Kartograph (2014-11-26 16:16:27+00:00): Spuren wieder zusammengeführt!
und den Tag "turn:lanes" hinzugefügt.
trigpoint (2014-11-25 16:07:30+00:00): Hi Janet , what you have put in the name is more a description than the name. The name should be what is on the signs.
I have never seen a sign there prohibiting horses.
Sylvain M (2021-03-18 15:34:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Je viens de voir que vous aviez cartographié le chêne de Saint-Civran à cet emplacement.
Pour ma part, sans avoir fait de terrain, mes investigations le placaient plutôt ici :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8520816632
Etes-vous sûr de l'emplacement ?
(peut-être n'est-ce pas le même arbre ? pour ma part, je parles de celui ci : https://lestetardsarboricoles.fr/wordpress/2013/01/13/le-chene-de-la-bitte-saint-civran-indre/ )
OverQuantum (2014-11-29 11:57:48+00:00): Wrong. Reverted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27109418
Issue created: https://github.com/osmlab/to-fix/issues/53
PlaneMad (2015-11-12 11:23:55+00:00): Replied on https://github.com/osmlab/to-fix/issues/53#issuecomment-156078387
lezurdis (2014-11-26 11:39:58+00:00): Olá,

É a tua primeira alteração, parabéns e desejo-te as boas vindas.

Queria dizer-te que a classificação do parque de estacionamento não está correto (amenity=parking é para carros), para as bicicletas temos o amenity=bicycle_parking :
- http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle_parking

Deixo-te corrigir, podes também assim tirar ou nome "Estacionamento de bicicletas" já não é preciso dado que sabemos com a classificação.

Boa continuação
joelmoliveira (2014-11-26 16:33:42+00:00): Olá, obrigado pelo comentário. Foi de facto a primeira vez que interagi com a plataforma no sentido de acrescentar conteúdo. Vou fazer a revisão.
lezurdis (2014-11-25 23:42:28+00:00): Viva,

Adicionaste a ciclovia uma de cada lado da Estrada da Mata, se calhar não tinhas reparado que a Estrada da Mata já estava classificada em cycleway=track :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257508900
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80476586

Como explicado aqui, se não houver separação fisica, um só way chega para descrever a estrada e a ciclovia.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

Toma nota também que a Estrada da Mata faz parte da rota EV1 caracteristica da sua importância como ciclovia :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2762339
scai (2014-11-25 19:12:41+00:00): Bitte bei den Öffnungszeiten an das gängige Schema halten: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
scai (2015-01-26 18:33:18+00:00): Du hast die bereits abgerissenen Gebäude wieder erneut eingezeichnet, obwohl ich sie extra mit "note=Gebäude abgerissen" getaggt hatte :(

Hab die Änderungen rückgängig gemacht. Das nächste Mal bitte genauer hinschauen :)
Gaurozauron (2014-12-04 12:09:34+00:00): Są parkingi, są samochody, więc jaki deptak?
lezurdis (2014-11-25 22:27:28+00:00): Olá,

Queria dizer-te que no OSM não abreviamos os nomes, por isso o nome desta rua não devia ter Av. mas Avenida por completo :
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314447425
sztruks (2014-11-25 18:22:32+00:00): correction à supprimer, je n’ai pas tenu compte de la rénovation du quartier, en me fiant aux seules images satellites
Hjart (2014-11-25 20:04:21+00:00): Kilde/source bliver nu (mere eller mindre) automatisk angivet i changesettet af iD & JOSM. Desuden kan man skimte en del af sporene på Geodatastyrelsens billeder.
sztruks (2014-11-25 18:21:25+00:00): correction à supprimer: je n’ai pas tenu compte de la rénovation du quartier, avec mes excuses
cadsauxk (2014-12-21 13:18:01+00:00): Em que pese a sua boa intenção de evitar confusão com localidades homônimas, a localidade "Porto Alegre" não deve ser formatada com a cidade entre parênteses, no caso "(Moeda)". 

Separar as várias localidades homônimas é função do aplicativo, no caso do mapa on-line é função do Nominatim.

Veja por exemplo todas as ocorrências de "Porto Alegre" https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Porto%20Alegre

Com a localidade formatada como "Porto Alegre (Moeda)" ela não aparece na lista de cidades.

Formatação corrigida: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27608628
GerdP (2015-10-20 07:33:02+00:00): please review way 314317302:
I've changed the invalid tag
highway=path;unclassified
back to 
highway=path
GerdP (2015-10-20 07:35:20+00:00): similar:
way 314317311
GerdP (2015-10-20 07:36:37+00:00): .. and way 314323861
emacsen (2014-11-25 20:53:31+00:00): Hello,

What is the source for this changeset?

It spans a huge area of the globe and contains details that you could not have gotten from Bing.
jfricher (2014-11-25 18:29:33+00:00): Hello 4rch, I need that polygon. Please undo the delete and ask before deleting next time.
jfricher (2014-11-25 18:40:36+00:00): I dont mind changing the landuse type. but please restore my work.
pnorman (2014-11-25 19:49:01+00:00): If you think it's a different landuse type and want it restored as that, you should indicate the type. It's fairly clearly not landuse for significant parts of it, and I can't see any type that most of it is.
jfricher (2014-11-25 20:14:43+00:00): I am a volunteer teacher helping the haitian immigrants in dominican republic.  I am using osm to organise our community teaching work within this specific territory. I havent yet found the perfect landuse denomination but I dont mind putting a new one.
jfricher (2014-11-25 20:18:03+00:00): within the next few months, I will continue to contribute in refining this area by adding tons of relevant details, street names, business & schools & other locations. But I cannot accept that someone delete my work without inquiring first. This behavior is not respecting the osm guidelines.
4rch (2014-11-26 12:00:02+00:00): The polygon could be simply restored but this makes no sense when you don't tell us what this polygon represents.

Maybe you are searching for a service like Umap where you can visualize objects which are incompatible with OpenStreetMap? I've created an example for Kreyol Matanza: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/kreyol-matanza_22614#12/19.3625/-70.6277
Or are you searching for a tool to coordinate the mapping effort? http://tasks.hotosm.org/
4rch (2014-11-26 12:48:21+00:00): Also I think that my modus operandi was ok as I've notified you about the deletion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26898665
jfricher (2014-11-27 16:27:21+00:00): I was able to open your umap link but dont know how to take control back over the polygon. Please let me know how
jfricher (2014-11-27 18:12:18+00:00): I need to import the polygone into my umap so I can continue it's edition. this way I will not have lose my work. thanks in advance
4rch (2014-11-27 19:12:31+00:00): download the following file which contains the polygon: http://www.filedropper.com/export1
Then you can upload the file into umap when you press the upload button on the right side: http://i.imgur.com/AaSE3iz.png
jfricher (2014-11-27 19:33:28+00:00): I was able to do it thanks.
Qantor (2014-11-25 21:29:58+00:00): Den 3fachen Rewe bereinigt.
Es heißt offiziell Stadtbibliothek + Stadtviertel (z.B.: http://www.muenchner-stadtbibliothek.de/index.php?id=62).
sommerluk (2014-11-26 21:39:14+00:00): Good work! Thanks for your contribution!

Bon travail ! Merci beaucoup !
przemas75 (2015-07-31 13:40:01+00:00): Skąd nazwa "Pomyślna" dla alejek parkingowych przy Decathlonie? Nie ma takiej ulicy w Gdańsku chyba (szukałem na gis.gdansk.pl)
trasa_gd (2015-07-31 15:08:54+00:00): Dodał ją dammat w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24335949
trasa_gd (2015-07-31 15:26:33+00:00): Na planie zagospodarowania przestrzennego można znaleźć ślad ulicy Pomyślnej: http://www.gdansk.pl/bip/architektura?plan=2313 .Usunę nazwę, jest oczywiście błędna.
Hjart (2014-11-25 20:32:04+00:00): Hvad har det her med footways at gøre?
Martin_Jensen (2014-11-26 08:19:48+00:00): Fair nok Hjart. Det gik vist lidt for hurtigt med JOSM, for jeg fik tydeligvis ikke ændret kommentaren fra sidst :-)
TA777 (2014-11-25 20:10:04+00:00): Previous mapper may have abandoned this area, names need fixing.
Firefishy (2015-03-21 00:45:28+00:00): This has cause massive damage to the road network. You have merged the roads and areas very badly. I have spent the last few hours unpicking this. Horrible. Please start small.
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-12-27 23:32:56+00:00): Degradacja dawnej DK19 do residential jest głupie.
psboypl (2014-11-26 16:16:04+00:00): Czemu wyrzuciłeś moje zmiany? Lepiej że jest puste czy o co chodzi?
maraf24 (2014-11-26 17:51:06+00:00): Nie mam nic przeciwko zapełnianiu pustych obszarów. 
Do jutra sprawdzę to jeszcze raz , bo widzę już że zmieniłeś większy obszar niż na to wyglądało.
Nie musisz nic robić, w razie czego sam przywrócę Twoje zmiany. choć niekoniecznie wszystkie.
clyde4x4 (2014-11-25 21:34:14+00:00): Correct position bus stop
4rch (2014-11-26 10:51:34+00:00): Please respect the OpenStreetMap guidelines for disputed boundaries: http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf
Otherwhise I have to inform the Data Working Group.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has no physical control over Sutorina. We do not map any claims.

I've reverted your changeset.

Thanks
edilqueirozdearaujo (2015-02-10 16:03:14+00:00): Não se preocupe se os dados não aparecem no mapa principal. Alguns itens não são renderizados em algumas camadas, mas o mais importante é que a informação está no mapa :D 
parabéns!
dthibau (2014-11-25 22:12:24+00:00): titel is misleidend
beter : toevoeging "turn restrictions"
luftgrafchristian (2018-02-15 14:56:31+00:00): Die Streckendaten sind teilweise doppelt vorhanden, sollten diese dann nicht gelöscht werden? Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27104374
tomasss (2014-11-25 22:26:34+00:00): sorry, my mistake
edilqueirozdearaujo (2014-11-27 18:27:20+00:00): landuse, no caso landuse=commercial, se aplica a uso de terra para determinado fim... uma boa dica é usar para sorveteria amenity=ice_cream. E como é um prédio, usar building=yes Resultado → https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27072371
Documentação → http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Tag:amenity%3Dice_cream
edilqueirozdearaujo (2014-11-27 18:27:57+00:00): É isso aí! Uma boa dica é evitar o conflito de area=yes (área) com building=yes (construção). Nesse caso, building=yes é o indicado pois diz que se trata de um prédio. Resultado → https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27072501
edilqueirozdearaujo (2014-11-27 18:25:54+00:00): Legal! Uma dica é mapear prédios internos como building=school e especificar entradas. Resultado → https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27071065
Documentação → http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
edilqueirozdearaujo (2014-11-27 18:47:41+00:00): Muito bem! Em casos como esse, quando não temos uma classificação definida ou diretamente apropriada, uma dica é fazer o seguinte: Se tiver vários elementos dentro de uma área e em caso de dúvida, prefira mapear o prédio principal e identificar somente este. No caso, a APAE.  Se existir muro ou cerca, opcionalmente pode também definir a linha de contorno como muro ou cerca. A entrada de um local pode ser definida com um simples ponto, com a tag entrance=main (quando é a principal) ou entrance=yes
Resultado → https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27074382
No caso de uma clínica, geralmente não aparece no mapa. Se puder identificar o contorno do prédio, vocẽ pode adicionar building=yes para que possa aparecer no mapa. Resultado → https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27073045
Gwilbor (2014-11-29 06:09:06+00:00): Ciao, sinceramente ho cancellato la nuova strada che avevi tracciato, in parte perché invece di modificare la via Magnolfi esistente hai tracciato sopra una strada nuova creando un doppione, in parte perché credo sia meglio mantenere via Magnolfi come residenziale invece che tertiary (anche se la classificazione strade non è una scienza esatta, quindi ben vengano le modifiche in generale). Ho visto che stai mettendo un sacco di attività commerciale con indirizzo, complimenti, buon lavoro!
SomeoneElse (2014-12-22 19:03:24+00:00): I'm guessing that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314495341 is probably an "amenity=fast_food; cuisine=burger" or similar?
dforsi (2015-01-16 11:04:22+00:00): Dopo questo changeset, il cinema Garibaldi risulta piazzato in mezzo all'incrocio tra via Galluri e via Marmocchi, puoi controllare?
naoliv (2014-11-25 23:50:46+00:00): Paulo, o que seria esse ponto que você inseriu?
naoliv (2014-11-26 00:03:47+00:00): Rogério, você está inserindo as ruas de forma incorreta. Por exemplo, essas áreas: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314499977
As ruas devem ser traçadas como linhas simples, conectando um lugar ao outro, e não como uma área fechada desta forma. Também é necessário colocar a função dela (dizer que ela é uma rua, por exemplo)
Rhubarb (2014-11-26 02:25:03+00:00): Welcome to openstreetmap ash_mcd :-)
Thanks for adding missing street names around Eynesbury, but please don't abbrieviate road names, eg: "Wangaratta Street", not "Wangaratta St". I've fixed them up anyhow. Have fun with OSM, and thanks for improving the map :) - Rhubarb.
Supaplex (2016-07-29 08:39:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3205651042
這筆在田中央怪怪的
zarl (2014-11-26 15:20:44+00:00): Hi Toni, es könnte gut sein, dass der Christkindlmarkt, den du auf der Fläche Marienplatz eingetragen hast, in keiner XMas-map angezeigt wird. Irgendwo habe ich gelesen, dass da nur nodes und ways, aber keine areas ausgewertet werden. Sollte man vielleicht in den nächsten Tage schauen, ob das hier angezeigt wird. 
Übrigens gibts da auch immer einen imposanten Weihnachtsbaum direkt vor dem Rathaus :-)
Gruss,
Carl
ToniE (2014-11-26 15:53:17+00:00): Danke Carl, die Einschränkung bzgl. Areas hatte ich gestern auch bemerkt und muss Ottobrunner Markt (wird allerdings dargestellt) noch anpassen. Den Marienplatz-Markt hätte ich aber wohl vergessen. Mach' ich mal heute Abend.
Danke und Gruß,
Toni
PlaneMad (2015-12-05 14:40:51+00:00): Uzma, looks like you changed the name by mistake of Kurla Terminus. Corrected it, thanks.
CloCkWeRX (2015-01-17 14:37:44+00:00): For the new buildings here, what's your source? I can't see much on bing, mapbox or http://data.gov.au/dataset/geelong-roofprints-kml
Udo G (2014-11-26 09:09:34+00:00): das sind neue, asphaltierte Straßen
luschi (2015-08-09 12:42:07+00:00): werden die Straßen vorwiegend von den Bauern verwendet?
Dann sollten sie als "highway=track", "tracktype=grade1" und "surface=asphalt" gemappt werden.
lg
Udo G (2015-08-10 07:01:28+00:00): Ja, wird vor allem von Bauern verwendet.
luschi (2015-08-10 10:52:05+00:00): hab ich jetzt wie oben beschrieben geändert:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33236399
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-26 10:28:44+00:00): Proszę na wikimedia commons nie wrzucać zdjęć, będących zrzutem ekranu z Google Street View.
Maxime Résibois (2014-11-26 09:50:50+00:00): test
Derick Rethans (2014-11-26 10:04:30+00:00): Hi!

Do you have a physical office at that location, that people can come and visit?

cheers,
Derick
luschi (2015-03-12 17:05:55+00:00): Hausnummern an falscher Stelle mit Fragezeichen zu versehen ist nicht die Norm. hierfür bitte "fixme=Position kontrollieren" verwenden. fixme=... wird von verschiedenen Programmen erkannt und als "Fehler" angezeigt
BushmanK (2014-11-29 01:30:46+00:00): Вот это http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314544096 - не тропа (path) а тротуар (footway). Плюс, он не соединен ни с чем общими точками. Карта OSM - не просто картинка, это схема. Кроме того, если тротуар вплотную прилегает к улице, его, чаще всего, не обозначают, а ставят на саму улицу (соответствующий ее участок) теги sidewalk=left/right/both
SanSan (2014-11-30 13:55:11+00:00): Понял, спасибо за разъяснения! Буду  впредь внимательнее.
Vincent de Phily (2014-11-27 10:57:41+00:00): Hi, congrats on your first changeset :)

You might wonder why nothing appears on the rendered map. This is because you need to add tags to your way to describe what it is. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway

It looks like this way should be "highway=unclassified" at the start of it, and then become a "highway=track" (the osm way needs to be split). Fancy finishing the job ?

Thanks, and welcome.
D Muldoon (2014-11-27 11:29:20+00:00): Thanks for the feedback. I was thinking it could not be that simple to add road to this fantastic map, so I'm not surprised that I have to add more info. I'll spend some time later to see if I can complete it.

Regards
Damian
msevilla00 (2016-09-13 11:50:08+00:00): Hola,
Estuve viendo el área que has delimitado con el nombre de "URBANIZACIÓN ILEGAL" [1] y tengo un par de anotaciones al respecto: 
- La etiqueta de nombre no es para incluir aspectos legales y/o subjetivos si no el nombre. Esta información puede ir a la etiqueta "note=*" / Notas desde iD (creo)
- La delimitación del área no se si la incluiría como un uso del suelo residencial (landuse=residential) desde la imagen de satélite y la ortofoto parece más bien un área forestal con casas dispersas (no se ajusta correctamente a la etiqueta residencial [2])

Por tanto quizá sea necesario modificar esta edición.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org
/way/314554793
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential?uselang=en
naoliv (2015-01-10 15:22:06+00:00): mmorgado, de onde você obteve a velocidade máxima (maxspeed) destes trechos?