piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mokart1 (2016-03-26 21:43:58+00:00): Also jetzt noch einmal der Reihe nach:
- Als ich den Poller einfach so auf die Straße gezogen hatte, konnte ich ihm keinerlei Attribute zuweisen, und Du hast moniert, er stehe neben der Straße.
- Dann habe ich statt dessen an der Position des Pollers einen Punkt auf der Straße eingefügt. Nun konnte ich der Straße links vom Poller andere Eigenschaften zuweisen als rechts vom Poller. Dem Poller selbst konnte ich aber auch jetzt keine Attribute zuweisen. Ich dachte mir aber, es seien nun genügend "access"-Parameter angegeben, denn bei "access" geht es ja wohl um die Zugänglichkeit der Straße(nteile) und nicht der des Pollers.
- Wenn das nun doch nicht erreicht, sag mir bitte exakt, wie ich das mache. Im Wiki finde ich nichts dazu. Zudem kann ich auf den Poller jetzt nicht mehr isoliert zugreifen, weil er entweder Teil der einen Straßenhälfte ist oder der andere, aber nicht ein Element für sich allen.

Zur Benennung: Nicht ich habe sämtlichen Straßen um das Justizzentrum den Namen Rathenaustraße zugewiesen. Immerhin hat aber das Justizzentrum die Adresse Rathenaustr. 13; man könnte also argumentieren, daß auch all sein Straßenland zur Rathenaustraße gehört. Zudem scheint die Rathenaustraße ein Kuriosum zu sein, das nicht nur (zunächst per Rad- und Fußweg) die Felsenkellerstr. mit der Westbahnhofstr. verbindet, sondern auch das Viertel nördlich und bis hin zum Westbahnhof umschlingt.
czubi (2016-03-26 22:55:05+00:00): Na das sieht doch schon ganz gut aus.Genau wie die Straße kannst Du auch den Punkt des Pollers auswählen und Ihm ein access Attribut geben, das gleiche gilt ebenso für die Parkplatze an sich, denen muss du das attribut privat  auch noch anhängen. Eine Anmerkung noch: Der Teil vor der Schranke ist nicht access=private (Lösung-> Straße an der Schranke teilen und access=privat im vorderen Bereich wieder entfernen. Du arbeitest mit Potlatch, das ist der einzige Editor bei dem ich dir leider nicht helfen kann.
czubi (2016-03-26 23:08:21+00:00): Nochmal zu deinen Fragen in kurz. Der Poller muss immer IN die Straße sonst können die Router nichts damit anfangen.
Wenn die Router was damit anfangen sollen dann musst Du ihnen sagen was. (passierbar für welches Verkehrsmittel)
Das gleiche gilt auch für die Straßen und die Parkplätze.
czubi (2016-03-27 19:42:13+00:00): Das ist jetzt leider falsch. access= privat am poller? vorher hast du geschrieben Autos können da nicht durchfahren. Da mußt Du dich jetzt mal entscheiden.Bycicle und foot yes bedeutet im Umkehrschluß das die Rathenaustraße eine öffentliche Straße ist.
Was ist denn nun richtig?
czubi (2016-03-28 09:16:50+00:00): ich hab's eingebessert
PT-53 (2016-03-09 17:23:12+00:00): In diesem CS wurden 3 Wege gelöscht. Warum ?
Was soll der Kommentar "lt. GeoPortaal BW" bedeuten ?
PT-53 (2016-03-16 18:38:29+00:00): Änderungssatz revertet, da auf Kommentar vom 09.03. keine Reaktion erfolgte
mavl (2019-03-17 16:04:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:04:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
*Martin* (2016-03-29 13:27:17+00:00): Dobry den Emanuel. Planujete dokoncit/opravit modru znacku v mape? Pretoze je akasi rozbita. Vid. https://www.freemap.sk/?l=15494-6907
Dakujem.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
trigpoint (2016-03-09 14:03:42+00:00): Please can you explain this addition?

Thanks Phil
Alecs01 (2016-03-09 19:28:34+00:00): Grazie e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap!
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2025-01-21 17:45:07+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai l'impression que dans ce groupe de modifications vous avez enlevé toute la cartographie intérieure du bâtiment Inria, qui était connue pour être très précise. Est-ce qu'il y avait une raison ?
Thibaud MICHEL (2025-01-21 18:50:42+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement c'était à la demande de la direction de l'époque dans le but de ne pas exposer l'intérieur du bâtiment.
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2025-01-21 19:58:55+00:00): Ça marche 😊 Merci beaucoup !
Hjart (2016-03-09 19:39:00+00:00): Er dette også importer? Undskyld jeg spørger, men jeg kan slet ikke forestille mig dig tegne sådan noget her manuelt.
Priscilla73 (2016-03-22 03:27:29+00:00): こんにちは。ひとつ確認したいのですが、熊谷市のハイアールアジアR&Dを横切るウェイ#402677100は削除してもよろしいでしょうか？元々この辺は田畑で、確かにこの場所に道はあったのですが、数年前のハイアールアジアR&D（旧三洋電機の家電部門）のこの場所への進出に伴い、この道は無くなったと記憶しています。私がこのハイアールの地物を追加したときに元々あった道も削除しました。私のほうでも時間のあるときに再度現地調査を行おうと思いますが、ご確認いただけると助かります。BingやGSImaps/std、GSImaps/ortには反映されていないので、少し間際らしいのですが。数日前に高崎線の車内から眺めたときは変化が見られなかったので、新たに構内道路を新設したとかっていうこともないと思うのですが。
tkamada (2016-03-22 13:13:14+00:00): ご連絡有難うございます。
国土地理院のオルソ画像からの描画でしたので、古い情報を元に地図に反映してしまったようです。
お手数をお掛けして申し訳ないです。
Priscilla73 (2016-03-23 15:07:51+00:00): ご確認ありがとうございます。近いうちに私のほうでも再度現地へ赴いて、確認した結果を地図上に反映させたいと思います。
Priscilla73 (2016-03-28 03:10:39+00:00): 変更セット#38104278で地図へ反映いたしました。よろしくお願いいたします。
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_751601 (2016-04-17 10:37:21+00:00): маршрут 1 тралика не соответствует действительности
pfg21 (2016-04-18 05:01:24+00:00): это старый маршрут.
надо вообще маршруты доделать, времени нет.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:14:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
martiensch (2016-04-02 16:11:39+00:00): Hoi JJJWegdam,

Ik zag jouw commentaar bij de in aanleg zijnde spoorlijn Roodeschool-Eemshaven. Hier is meer informatie te vinden: http://www.provinciegroningen.nl/uitvoering/verkeer-en-vervoer/spoorlijn-roodeschool-eemshaven/

Groeten,

Martien
JJJWegdam (2016-04-02 16:24:27+00:00): Bedankt voor de informatie Martien! Ik hoop dat de vernieuwde rail shapes in de smaak vallen
martiensch (2016-04-02 16:34:11+00:00): alle info is mooi mee genomen. Zelf kan ik weinig vinden. Op de renders lijkt het dat het spoor noordelijk van de Borkumkade, tegen de dijk aan komt te liggen, maar nu is het zuidelijk getekend.

OSM blijft vaak genoeg itereren en wachten op iemand die alles precies weet of meet en dat komt het goed
maxerickson (2017-08-18 16:47:35+00:00): It seems this import accidentally omitted building relations: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/r3L

Not just in this changeset, the entire region. Not too bad to patch up, ~180 ways shown in that query, so probably 90 fixes at most (depending on how many of the ways are from other sources and how many of the buildings have multiple inners).
Jonah Adkins (2017-08-21 12:31:46+00:00): Thanks for catching that. Ill check it out.
mueschel (2016-03-12 14:25:39+00:00): Hi Yorvik,
this node has a strange key:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4051038589
Is that supposed to be entrance or access or something else?

Cheers, Jan
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-03-12 15:18:39+00:00): is the entrance - the perils of predictive text.
Thanks
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:05:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:06:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:06:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:06:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:06:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
5m4u9 (2016-03-11 06:44:40+00:00): Gracias por añadir más información en el mapa.

Si puedes completar las otras calles, las direcciones de flujo, los negocios, y demás estaría bueno.

Añadir tu casa esta bueno, pero ponerle nombre no.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:06:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:06:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:06:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-17 16:06:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
freeExec (2016-03-10 08:03:45+00:00): Так ты хотел добавить тропинок, а добавил пешеходных дорожек!
mavl (2019-03-17 16:06:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Kars (2016-07-25 10:29:32+00:00): Hoi,

Ik zit even naar de history van "Way: Johannes Vermeerstraat (236482421)" te kijken, en zie dat jij deze in versie 2 de naam "George Breitnerstraat" hebt gegeven. Die naam is daarna weer verwijdered door Commodoortje, waarna jij de naam in deze wijzingenset op "Johannes Vermeerstraat" hebt gezet.

Volgens mij heeft deze weg geen naam, en was de wijziging van Commodoortje correct. De weg komt niet voor in het meest recente "Nationaal Wegen Bestand", wat betekent dat deze geen naam heeft. Het is alleen maar een toegangsweggetje voor de achtertuinen.

Heb je bewijs dat de weg inderdaad een naam heeft?

Groet,

Kars.
dvdhoven (2016-07-25 12:01:59+00:00): Hallo Kars,

Als je vindt dat het niet moet, pas het aan.
Ik heb geen idee verder en ook niet veel zin om er diep in te duiken. Ik ben al met diverse andere zaken bezig
Als het gaat om het weggetje achter de schuren, dat kan naar vmijn idee een naamlooos pad worden

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Viajero Perdido (2016-08-26 12:30:46+00:00): Hi alester.

Many of these CanVec waterbodies don't seem to exist any more; see satellite view.  A random example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6037966#map=17/53.89413/-112.21312 or others nearby; it's simply farmland now and not even the outlines are visible.

(The geocaching map allows an easy back/forth comparison.)

Farther west, I'm personally hand-mapping water bodies (from satellite) in an attempt to discourage CanVec imports.  I hope it works.
Nakaner (2016-08-27 19:44:13+00:00): @Viajero Perdido: I yesterday found (by accident, I tried out To-Fix and the second error was CANVEC stuff) another CANVEC import changeset by another user which lacks any quality checks before upload. The user even ignored the messages of JOSM validator. Did you have a look at the changesets of alester if they are technically ok? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39517002

If you want, I can revert this changeset and others, too.
Viajero Perdido (2016-08-28 04:34:29+00:00): I'd hesitate to revert this.  I was thinking more about "urging caution" for future work...
Richard (2017-01-22 10:18:16+00:00): Hi Mike,

Interested to note your retagging of the D'Arcy Dalton Way with a comment that it's "no longer classified as a long-distance path". It still appears to be signposted round here and the guidebook has just (December) been republished. Can you shed any light?

All the best
Richard
Mike Baggaley (2017-01-22 12:51:56+00:00): Hi Richard, Unfortunately I can't remember where I got the information from (possibly LDWA), but my update predates the new guidebook by almost a year. I assume that the route has subsequently been updated and reclassified. I have removed the historic prefix.

Regards,
Mike
Richard (2017-01-22 16:34:18+00:00): Hi Mike,
That's great - thank you. Went for a walk today and it is still (happily) very much in evidence on the ground, albeit a bit muddy!
All the best
Richard
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Robert Whittaker (2016-07-11 17:02:33+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4051381385 (currently tagged with name=Defibrillator) an Automated External Defibrillator (AED)? If so, it should be tagged with emergency=defibrillator. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency%3Ddefibrillator
woollypigs (2016-07-11 18:05:04+00:00): Yes it is a AED, I couldn't get my head around what to call it and if we are marking them on the maps. I will change it now
woollypigs (2016-07-11 18:08:54+00:00): Hmm can't change it. Do you know how?
SomeoneElse (2016-04-06 19:22:47+00:00): For info, in case you haven't seen it, https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/49058/rendering-of-lakes-on-garmin-devices .
andygol (2016-08-18 09:56:39+00:00): This relation was copied to another one http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/6447668. Now there are two same features with the same errors. <br />

1) members with empty roles (w428966612, w 428969676) <br />
2) excessive member - w437000772 <br />

Andy (@SomeoneElse) could you take a look 👀
SomeoneElse (2016-08-18 12:52:54+00:00): @andygol see https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2016-August/thread.html#19100 .
Protoxenus (2018-05-25 20:46:42+00:00): Hallo, 
du hast hier in Comthurey eine "Bungalowsiedlung Vogelheide" gesetzt. Ich Bin da lang gefahren, habe aber nirgends einen Hinweis darauf gefunden und auf den Luftbildern sieht das überhaupt nicht wie eine Bungalowsiedlung aus. Bist du dir da ganz sicher ?
Gruß Protoxenus
Geofreund1 (2018-05-26 06:36:15+00:00): Lt. ORKA-MV heißt die Gegend so, ob da nun Bungalows stehen oder nicht. Was möchtest du denn genau korrigiert haben: Name, Gebäude, .. ?
Wenn da jetzt auch keinerlei Gebäude mehr stehen, dann reißen wir sie eben ab.
Protoxenus (2018-05-26 10:22:09+00:00): Wenn man bei ORKA-MV weiter hineinzoomt, steht da nur Vogelheide, ohne Bungalowsiedlung. ORKA-MV übernimmt viele Daten aus OSM. Könnte sein, dass sich die Katze hier in den Schwanz beißt? 
Die dort stehenden Doppelhäuser sind jedenfalls keine Bungalows. Ich wollte nur mal den Ursprung des Namens erfahren, weil er mir seltsam vorkommt.
Gruß Protoxenus
Kengaru (2017-03-13 14:05:23+00:00): Откуда название мыс Кут?
sergeybe (2017-03-13 15:01:59+00:00): А про это где-то читал. Что на востоке Крыма есть два мыса, если их имена соединить то получится имя мыса на западе. Кут - это угол, если перевести с крымско-татарского или украинского.
Рыбаки, которые наблюдали за бакланами с обрывов с левой стороны бухты Рифов, тоже его называли Кут.
ramyaragupathy (2016-03-15 13:02:32+00:00): Hi Saloni,

Good to see you improvising data here! Please make sure to add tags for the roads here,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402744797/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402744794/history

Also there is a random line here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402744795/history which does not align to any real world object in imagery.

Can you please make sure to fix these issues?
maraf24 (2016-03-09 22:49:00+00:00): Cześć
Skąd masz informacje o takim przebiegu granicy? Była jakaś zmiana?
Krister (2016-03-10 18:20:22+00:00): mieszkam tutaj. 
Generalnie źle jest wrysowana granica Kobylanka - Dominikowice. m.in. całe centrum Kobylanki jest jako Dominikowice. W miarę wolnego czasu poprawię to.
maraf24 (2016-03-10 19:43:43+00:00): Granica była wyrysowane wg danych z EMUiA. Oczywiście zdarzają się tam dane nieaktualne. 
Z tego co widziałem, to nowa granica biegnie mniej więcej po granicach działek, czyli tak jak powinno być. 
Trzeba uważać przy adresach. Np. tu http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396806341 w addr:place i addr:city są dwie różne miejscowości, a powinna być ta sama.
maraf24 (2016-03-09 22:51:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/402746586
To jest budynek i musi być oznaczony jako budynek. Podwórzem gopodarskim można oznaczyć teraz wokół tego budynku.
Krister (2016-03-10 18:16:36+00:00): ok, racja. To moje pierwsze zmiany.
LeTopographeFou (2019-12-16 21:37:52+00:00): Hi, you put maxweight=40000 which means 40000 tons (40000000 kg!) on four ways here. I think you wanted to say 'maxweight=40000 lbs'. Can you please fix?
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-18 16:40:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Hjart (2016-03-09 20:27:59+00:00): Pas på. Veje må ikke krydse sig selv og det er de kommet til flere steder her. Jeg fikser det lige.
Hjart (2016-03-09 20:31:51+00:00): Hvornår er de iøvrigt omlagt? Det er en noget særegen konstruktion, som jeg ikke har set før.
MichaelHaase (2016-03-15 13:54:43+00:00): Det var i løbet sidste halvår af 2015.

"Ombygningen omfatter en omlægning af venstresvingssporene på Vallensbæk Torvevej, så de ligger modsat normal udformning. På den måde bliver der mulighed for at forlænge venstresvingsbanerne i begge retninger og skabe bedre kapacitet i krydsene. "
Hjart (2016-03-15 18:49:51+00:00): Tak for svaret. Jeg har lige tilføjet lidt tekst på dem, så den næste der ser på dem ikke bliver forvirret ligesom jeg :-)
Geography Canada (2016-03-13 16:45:01+00:00): The Wikipedia page says it is a city. Source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unalaska,_Alaska.
Geography Canada (2016-03-13 16:45:32+00:00): The Wikipedia page says it is a city. Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unalaska,_Alaska.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-13 20:33:53+00:00): There are a couple of reasons why we can't use wikipedia as a source.  One is that wikipedia is cc-by-sa licensed, and that licence is incompatible with OSM.

The other is that what OSM calls a "city" is described on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity .  Wikipedia essentially just records what the city calls itself (or strictly speaking what someone has reported the city as calling itself).

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity even says "Smaller charter cities should normally be tagged using place=town to avoid these places being promoted too highly in gazetteer search results. According to OSM the population here is 4167, which even for Alaska counts as "smaller".
It should also be noted that admin levels and "place" levels are something that should be discussed within an OSM community - having someone coming in from outside and applying what are essentially random values without discussion just makes OSM data harder to use and OSM harder to edit for the people who _are_ trying to work together.
Geography Canada (2016-03-14 15:06:37+00:00): Oh sorry... I never thought of that... I will discuss with the community from now on.
Geography Canada (2016-05-10 20:45:15+00:00): Redland City's website (which I thought, at the time, was an allowed source, before I knew) says that it's a city, but now you've explained why we can't source from such places, as OSM has its own rule on what's a "city". I did not know that then. Sorry.
Geography Canada (2016-05-10 20:51:04+00:00): "What the place describes itself as is essentially irrelevant in OSM terms. If local OSM mappers think that it deserves to be a city, then it does. Previous to your edit, it's actually spent time in OSM as both town and city. It's original "city" status seems to have come directly from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cities_of_Australia , and there are a bunch of places on there that I've been to that I don't think should qualify as "cities" in OSM terms - Rockingham and Fremantle are obvious examples (both currently "towns" in OSM).
I'd suggest discussing it on the talk-au list."
Geography Canada (2016-05-10 20:51:15+00:00): Same applies here, right?
Geography Canada (2016-05-10 20:54:47+00:00): "There are a couple of reasons why we can't use wikipedia as a source. One is that wikipedia is cc-by-sa licensed, and that licence is incompatible with OSM.

The other is that what OSM calls a "city" is described on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity . Wikipedia essentially just records what the city calls itself (or strictly speaking what someone has reported the city as calling itself).

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity even says "Smaller charter cities should normally be tagged using place=town to avoid these places being promoted too highly in gazetteer search results. According to OSM the population here is 4167, which even for Alaska counts as "smaller".
It should also be noted that admin levels and "place" levels are something that should be discussed within an OSM community - having someone coming in from outside and applying what are essentially random values without discussion just makes OSM data harder to use and OSM harder to edit for the people who _are_ trying to work together."
Geography Canada (2016-05-10 20:55:52+00:00): See comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37716055 - the same applies here.
Geography Canada (2016-05-10 20:56:14+00:00): I did not know all of that at the time. Sorry.
Geography Canada (2016-05-10 20:40:16+00:00): I was sourcing from Wikipedia, which I thought was allowed at the time. It says that Capalaba West's no more. Sorry.
Geography Canada (2016-03-13 15:10:52+00:00): Logan City's website refers to it as a city... Source: http://www.logan.qld.gov.au/about-logan/living-in-logan/statistics-and-facts. Should we revert it to "City" status?
SomeoneElse (2016-03-13 20:57:24+00:00): See comment on http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37716055 - the same applies here.

What the place describes itself as is essentially irrelevant in OSM terms.  If local OSM mappers think that it deserves to be a city, then it does.  Previous to your edit, it's actually spent time in OSM as both town and city.  It's original "city" status seems to have come directly from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cities_of_Australia , and there are a bunch of places on there that I've been to that I don't think should qualify as "cities" in OSM terms - Rockingham and Fremantle are obvious examples (both currently "towns" in OSM).
I'd suggest discussing it on the talk-au list.
karitotp (2016-12-01 16:17:37+00:00): Hi Nate_Wessel
Thank you for contributing to OSM, while working on this area, I found you deleted some highways which clearly exist based on Bing satellite imagery. So did you delete them for any special reason?
karitotp (2016-12-01 16:20:38+00:00): Also this changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37716174
Nate Wessel (2016-12-01 16:23:59+00:00): You might have noticed that much of this area is a mess of unedited TIGER imports whose tags bear little relation to reality. 

I think I probably deleted something that was not a residential road but was tagged that way.
Nate Wessel (2016-12-01 16:25:10+00:00): I feel like there are bigger fish to fry here... look just a little to the west to see what I mean.
yurasi (2016-11-30 19:36:06+00:00): Hi Nate_Wessel:
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed you deleted a road that is visible on satellite imagery Bing. ¿Can you revert your change? maybe you deleted them by mistake.
Nate Wessel (2016-11-30 20:00:40+00:00): I can't tell for sure, but I probably deleted an inaccurate TIGER import representing a minor driveway or track as a residential road. It's probably much easier just to draw it back in than to revert.
yurasi (2016-11-30 21:18:41+00:00): I've reverted your change. I think that like this is better XD https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19221607
Hjart (2016-03-09 21:15:49+00:00): Jeg bliver glad når jeg hører om god dokumentation. Mange tak :-).

Bemærk at der allerede er nogen Mapillary sekvenser i området og at nogen af dem (af "tryl") ser ud til at være blevet uploadet mindst 2 gange.
simonmikkelsen-dk (2016-03-10 11:54:29+00:00): Jeg er "tryl" på mapillary. Mine sekvenser skulle gerne kun være kommet op 1 gang. Jeg bruger 4 kamerarer (i forskellige vinkler) så der vil der ligge 4 streger oven i hinanden. Ellers kan der altid være smuttere. Men send mig gerne en privat besked med fejl. Mapillary er ved at moderisere der backend til at lave rettelser, så man har ikke kunnet lave rettelser i flere måneder. Men de kan altid gemmes.

Mapillary er godt til at dokumentere - bruger det ofte i stedet for eller sammen med en ren GPS.