piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-03 13:01:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121894121 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely edits by a new user, mostly in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6042 .
Kuritsyn Roman (2022-06-12 07:19:28+00:00): Добрый день! Сообщите пожалуйста источник данных для переименования города и административных границ Актобе в Абдинск. Мне не удалось найти никакой информации о переименовании города. Без убедительных объяснений с Вашей стороны будет расценено как вандализм и откачены изменения.
Kuritsyn Roman (2022-06-12 07:21:33+00:00): Есть казахстанский чат в телеграме: https://t.me/osm_kz
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
DressyPear4 (2022-06-06 03:56:02+00:00): Adicione um comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Há vários avisos de vias sobrepostas, corrija antes de enviar para o servidor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121825795
Mashin (2022-06-01 20:09:27+00:00): Hi and thanks for contributing to OSM!

I just saw that you created a "site" relation from an existing building. What are you trying to achieve?
NieWnen (2022-06-01 20:36:14+00:00): Cześć,
proszę postaraj się nie sklejać nic z granicami administracyjnymi. Jest to bardzo niepożądane, bo w ten sposób granice są nieustannie sztucznie przesuwane. To konkretne miejsce poprawiłem.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-02 10:56:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121846999 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy changes by a new user.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6038 .
DressyPear4 (2022-06-06 03:56:08+00:00): Adicione um comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Há vários avisos de vias sobrepostas, corrija antes de enviar para o servidor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121826286
NieWnen (2022-06-01 20:42:50+00:00): Odklejone przez Mordechai23 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121827313
abakus_uploader (2022-06-01 22:31:19+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
englu (2022-06-02 07:18:16+00:00): Ścieżka 244286789 w okolicach miejsca 49.653040, 20.230460 została błędnie zmieniona. Proszę porównać jej przebieg z warstwą "Geoportal 2: Cieniowanie rzeźby terenu ISOK" oraz z nagranymi śladami (tutaj instrukcja jak dołączyć warstwę ze śladami do JOSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Strava). Poprawiłem już zepsuty odcinek.
englu (2022-06-02 07:19:15+00:00): Tutaj dobrze widać co się zmieniło: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121826505/ (inia 244286789).
Władysław Komorek (2022-06-02 16:45:19+00:00): Możliwe, ale ja bazuję na aktualnych danych z Geoportal2 (Cieki i ortho) oraz Maxar Premium a nie na Strava czy ISOK cieniowanie. ISOK pokazuje zbyt uproszczone linie. Oczywiście w gęstym lesie ciężko jest zweryfikować przebieg linii. "tracks" najczęściej poprawiam na skrzyżowaniach z potokami.
Władysław Komorek (2022-06-03 17:32:28+00:00): Z mojego doświadczenia wynika, że "Cieniowanie rzeźby" nie może być w 100% wiarygodne na dzień dzisiejszy.
Praktycznie to ten WMS czy Strava daje nam tylko orientacyjny przebieg, zwłaszcza w terenie leśnym.
Przekonałem się o tym przy mapowaniu wschodnich obszarów Polski.
Szkoda, że WMS'y "Time Orthophotomap" nie jest dostępny wszędzie. Podobnie jak "High Resolution Orthophotomap", bo tylko one dają nam najbardziej przybliżony przebieg ścieżek.
BartekChom (2022-06-06 19:45:45+00:00): Przepraszam, zupełnie nie zgadzam się z Twoją edycją w okolicach budowy budynku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1061144061. On ma kształt podkowy, z grubsza tak, jak podałem (z tym, że rysowałem na oko; już widzę, że zaczynają stawiać ósmą kondygnację, czyli siedem, które podałem, się dezaktualizuje). Członów szeregowca za 29 nie ma. Nie pamiętam, jak narysowałem, dziś widzę, że ta podkowa jest blisko 29 i nie widzę granicy między budową a działką z 29, ale mogę się zgodzić, jeżeli twierdzisz, że budowa nie obejmuje budynku, który najwyraźniej już od dawna stoi. W każdym razie płot czy ścianka jest teraz ukośnie, a ślepa uliczka do niego dochodzi. Tego, co się dzieje od strony Alei Wilanowskiej, nie widziałem, zaznaczyłem na wyczucie i zgodnie ze zdjęciem

Nie mam uwag do twoich poprawek budynku Śródziemnomorska 43/Karczocha 2, za to proszę o wycofanie zmian przy budowie między Śródziemnomorską 29 a Śródziemnomorską 41. Budynki, które przywróciłeś, najwyraźniej są już zburzone.
syntex (2022-06-06 20:41:32+00:00): Ok, faktycznie. Nie spodziewałem się, że zburzą domki szeregowe. Faktycznie były one już tutaj wcześniej i je zburzono. Jeśli ty je kasowałeś, to następnym razem, jeśli nadal są one w ewidencji budynków (EGIB) to zamień je na was:building zamiast building.
BartekChom (2022-06-07 15:03:24+00:00): was:building - dziękuję
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Glassman (2022-06-02 23:54:29+00:00): I see someone already added the path back. It is useful to have the information to aid search and rescue. Just tag the access appropriately.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121827146
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
CurlingMan13 (2022-06-02 13:27:21+00:00): Reviewed.  Edit looks fine.
tuxtoriel (2022-06-01 22:14:54+00:00): Is this the correct way to represent the sidewalk and crossing?
tuxtoriel (2022-06-01 22:17:41+00:00): It is needed to be able to map the sidewalk (see the following changesets for its mapping), correct?
PT-53 (2022-10-15 06:42:49+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,
könntest Du bei diesen Türmen
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065965422/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065965424/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065965421/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065965420/history
jeweils noch den Tuerm-Typ ergänzen.

Gefunden mit OSMOSE:
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=18&lat=48.087912&lon=9.215903&item=1010%2C1040%2C1050%2C1060%2C1070%2C1080%2C1090%2C1100%2C1110%2C1120%2C1150%2C1160%2C1170%2C1180%2C1190%2C1200%2C1210%2C1221%2C1230%2C1240%2C1250%2C1270%2C1290%2C2010%2C2020%2C2030%2C2040%2C2060%2C2080%2C2100%2C2110%2C2120%2C2130%2C2140%2C2150%2C2160%2C3010%2C3020%2C3030%2C3031%2C3033%2C3040%2C3050%2C3060%2C3080%2C3090%2C3092%2C3093%2C3110%2C3120%2C3150%2C3160%2C3170%2C3180%2C3190%2C3200%2C3210%2C3220%2C3230%2C3240%2C3250%2C3260%2C3350%2C3360%2C4010%2C4020%2C4030%2C4040%2C4060%2C4070%2C4080%2C4090%2C4100%2C4110%2C4130%2C5020%2C5030%2C5040%2C5050%2C5060%2C5070%2C6xxx%2C7010%2C7011%2C7012%2C7020%2C7040%2C7050%2C7051%2C7070%2C7080%2C7090%2C7100%2C7110%2C7130%2C7150%2C7160%2C7170%2C7190%2C7220%2C7240%2C7250%2C8010%2C8011%2C8012%2C8020%2C8021%2C8022%2C8025%2C8026%2C8030%2C8031%2C8032%2C8042%2C8050%2C8051%2C8060%2C8070%2C8080%2C8090%2C8091%2C8100%2C8101%2C8110%2C8120%2C8121%2C8122%2C8130%2C8131%2C8132%2C8140%2C8150%2C8160%2C8161%2C8162%2C8170%2C8180%2C8182%2C8190%2C8191%2C8192%2C8200%2C8201%2C8202%2C8210%2C8211%2C8212%2C8221%2C8230%2C8240%2C8250%2C8260%2C8270%2C8280%2C8281%2C8282%2C8290%2C8300%2C8310%2C8320%2C8330%2C8331%2C8340%2C8341%2C8350%2C8351%2C8370%2C8380%2C8381%2C8382%2C8390%2C8391%2C8392%2C8400%2C8401%2C8410%2C8411%2C8412%2C8420%2C8430%2C8431%2C8450%2C8460%2C8470%2C8480%2C8490%2C8500%2C8510%2C8520%2C8530%2C9000%2C9001%2C9003%2C9004%2C9007%2C9009%2C9010%2C9011%2C9014%2C9016%2C9017%2C9018%2C9019&level=1%2C2%2C3&issue_uuid=22a6e287-64f4-41ce-b6f7-0f6b700e60f6

Grüße
PT-53 (2022-10-15 06:45:28+00:00): Und noch einer:
-https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1065965427/history
PT-53 (2022-10-23 06:52:32+00:00): Hallo EinEngener, 
ergänzt Di die Türme noch?
Fragende Grüße
DressyPear4 (2022-06-06 03:56:17+00:00): Adicione um comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Há vários avisos de vias sobrepostas, corrija antes de enviar para o servidor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121828130
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-03 13:01:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121894121 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely edits by a new user, mostly in Ukraine.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6042 .
user_2066394 (2022-06-02 10:38:34+00:00): Der war kurzlebig.
dkf2010 (2022-06-02 13:46:02+00:00): Stimmt ;)
Wurde von der App wohl 2 Mal hochgeladen. 
Hier ist der andere Eintrag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9789139004
user_2066394 (2022-06-02 13:48:39+00:00): Einwandfrei :-)
redd (2022-06-02 19:39:25+00:00): Vielen Dank!
Nathan_A_RF (2022-11-11 22:19:24+00:00): Do motorways need maxheight tags? It's implied that the maxheight of bridges on them is default unless stated
Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle (2022-11-14 16:38:17+00:00): Sadly, some motorways require that tall vehicles are in the centre-most lane under certain bridges - I assume the screetcomplete people have a reason for having included this quest.

I guess it's the usual default-assumption vs actually-checked-on-site argument.
trigpoint (2022-11-14 18:18:02+00:00): Can you cite any in the UK, or mainland Europe? I cannot recall ever seeing such a thing having driven on motorways in many European countries. IMHO it is certainly a quest that should not be enabled in the UK
Nathan_A_RF (2022-11-14 18:57:52+00:00): All motorway bridges should be a default height, only ones that have a low height I can recall are in Leeds. The Max Height Map does not include motorways as roads missing maxheight tags. Nonetheless, you do not add max height tags to the entire road - only tag the way directly under the bridge (see the wiki for more info)
Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle (2022-11-17 17:09:50+00:00): I have seen some of these bridges in the UK, but can't remember where.

Perhaps this should be taken up with the StreetComplete team.
Nathan_A_RF (2022-11-18 18:21:07+00:00): My point above still stands so please only tag the way directly below the bridge when you add maxheight tags
Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle (2022-11-18 19:50:41+00:00): Fair enough, would you like to notify the StreetComplete people to make this change, or shall I?

Using the app, I can split the way under the bridge and only.answer there, but that still leaves a messy UI and potentially unwanted extra metadata in the OSM database.

Where's the relevant wiki page? It would help me understand more completely what should be done.
Nathan_A_RF (2022-11-18 22:24:55+00:00): I am not familiar with the StreetComplete people so please go ahead. The relevant wiki page is here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight
Ornate Swimming Mapping Turtle (2022-11-19 09:22:55+00:00): Thanks, I shall do that, and in the meantime I have disabled this question in StreetComplete.
tuxtoriel (2022-06-01 22:13:37+00:00): I wanted to express the spacing and width of the bollards, and the associated kerbs. Is this correct?
kartler175 (2022-06-02 13:15:56+00:00): Diese Art von Multipolygonen scheinst sich zu einem Markenzeichen von dir zu entwickeln: https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.95290&lat=47.95296&zoom=15&opacity=0.95. Ich habe in letzter Zeit schon einige davon repariert, aber besser wäre es, wenn selber darauf achtest.
opendcc (2022-06-02 05:41:55+00:00): paßt schon
DressyPear4 (2022-06-06 03:56:27+00:00): Adicione um comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Há vários avisos de vias sobrepostas, corrija antes de enviar para o servidor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121829243
user_5359 (2022-06-03 04:35:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use the key building instead of buiilding.

Bem-vindo ao OSM! Por favor, utilizar a chave "building" em vez de "buiilding".
tuxtoriel (2022-06-01 22:11:52+00:00): Would this be a more accurate way to map the crosswalk?
mini-me (2022-06-02 12:05:36+00:00): Пожалуйста, используйте JOSM для редактирования маршрутов. Остановки должны быть отсортированы в порядке следования, а в редакторе iD вы этого сделать не сможете.
Bobropiton (2022-06-02 12:14:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Как раз сейчас занимаюсь редактированием правильного пути следования.
DressyPear4 (2022-06-06 03:56:33+00:00): Adicione um comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Há vários avisos de vias sobrepostas, corrija antes de enviar para o servidor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121829507
StreetPlant (2022-06-01 22:30:51+00:00): Also used; https://kaartviewer.hoorn.nl/?@Ruimtelijke%20plannen&x=133005&y=519971&zoom=10
DressyPear4 (2022-06-06 03:56:39+00:00): Adicione um comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Há vários avisos de vias sobrepostas, corrija antes de enviar para o servidor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121829907
mariotomo (2022-06-02 02:01:13+00:00): hi. I don't know if you have the time, but edits by this user look associated to this other one: CindyPacey3377. maybe not, just my impression.
mariotomo (2022-06-02 02:01:52+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/6397181
user_5359 (2022-06-03 17:29:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.osm.org/relation/2230597. What is the meaning of the tag name:tsleil waututh = Say Nuth Khaw Yum Provincial Park? "tsleil waututh" is not a defined language code.
maxbe (2022-06-02 07:52:46+00:00): Wie sieht denn dieser Automat aus? 

Da war bis zum Herbst ein Hüttchen, das wurde inzwischen abgebaut. Ich hab letzte Woche nachgesehn, obs nach dem Winter wieder auftaucht und es gelöscht, weils immer noch weg ist (changeset 121729459). Ich kann gern nochmal das Haus umrunden, für den Fall dass ich einfach nur blind bin und  der Automat gut getarnt... ;)
santon (2022-06-03 06:00:26+00:00): Das Hüttchen am Norwest-Eck der Maschinehalle (?) habe ich am 13.Februar 2022 fotografiert. Letzte Woche bin ich zwar nochmal dran vorbei gegangen, habe aber nicht darauf geachtet, ob es noch vorhanden ist. Gerne entfernen, wenn es weg ist.
maxbe (2022-06-03 06:14:52+00:00): Danke, habs gelöscht. Bin gestern vorbeigefahren und war echt nicht da. Ich hab aber ein Auge drauf, obs wieder aufgebaut wird, ich würde gern wieder dort die Eier holen.
maxbe (2022-11-11 15:35:36+00:00): War grad Eier kaufen, das Hüttchen ist wieder da, nur 30m gewandert und mit kürzeren Öffnungszeiten.
Herman Lee (2022-06-03 07:14:19+00:00): 此修改集进行退回，应改回为甸柳街道
RVR004 (2022-06-12 18:31:32+00:00): 感謝你的更改， 以後我們將更為謹慎
baumann3141 (2022-06-06 16:17:28+00:00): Please note that Bing aerial images are outdated. The previous edit was based on on-site survey.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121831788
ivanbranco (2022-06-03 19:12:29+00:00): Hi ke9tv,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/174474

after this edit this boundary has now a double place value "hamlet;CDP". Could you check it out?

To be honest I don't think the boundary should be mapped as place=* at all since this tag is already mapped on the label node: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

so I would leave the node element for the place feature and the relation element for the boundary feature.

Also now both boundary and node are tagged as "hamlet" but the wiki says it's a census-designate place, which is a value used already 139 times in the OSM database: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/place=census-designated
Maybe it should be a better value?

I leave the considerations to you since you seem to have local knowledge (which I don't have).

Happy mapping!
ke9tv (2022-06-03 21:34:37+00:00): Thanks for noticing this!  The `hamlet;CDP` on the boundary was a
copy-and-paste problem - I wasn't intentionally updating `place=*`
on boundaries, only on the nodes.

As far as the choice of the `place=*` value, let me begin by observing
that this edit is part of a months-long systematic review of NY admin
boundaries against the authoritative data in NYSGIS (for counties,
towns, cities and villages), and the updated CDP boundaries in
TIGER/Line 2021. The chief focus is on correct topology (all boundaries
closed; no crossing boundaries; townships and counties share boundary ways,
etc.) and correct geometry (for instance, getting the line between
New York County and Bronx County to follow the former line of the
Spuyten Duyvil Kill correctly, rather than being glued to nearby streets).

In the course of doing that, missing associations between boundary and label,
missing town and village halls, and cross references to GNIS, FIPS code,
and NY statewide-information-system code (SWIS) are also being corrected,
and Wikidata/Wikipedia links are being verified.

The tagging is being made consistent. There has been off-and-on active
discussion over the last six months or so on Slack and on
talk-us-newyork about what correct tagging for some of these features
is, and I agree that what's being done doesn't quite align with the
current consensus.  Nevertheless, the commenters seem to be willing to
accept my contention that 'wrong consistently' is the way to go for
the moment, allowing me to focus on the completeness of the
information and the accuracy of the geometry - which is entirely hard
enough!

Once there's a tagging consensus, and in another month or two when the
remaining boundaries are updated (there are just New York City and the
two Long Island counties left to finish) it will be easy to go back
with a mechanical edit and update things - removing `place=*` from
boundaries, tagging town halls as something other than the
`admin_centre` of the towns, respelling CDP as `census_determined` or
whatever.  That will also let us sort out what should be retained if,
as here, a census-determined place and a township-decreed hamlet are
precisely coterminous.
gscholz (2022-06-04 09:15:26+00:00): Hi Lord45,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding broken multipolygon relations:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-54.69394&lat=-29.49905&zoom=14

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=121831863

Can you please fix this?

My impression is you do not know what the roles "inner" and "outer"
do mean at all. May be you like to educate yourself about this topic:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

I also recommend to switch to JOSM to avoid such errors just from the beginning.
Guido
jaguari (2022-06-04 12:03:03+00:00): Hi
Yes, i noticed that, but I forgot to pay more attention to this problem. Thanks for the tip.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-02 04:00:40+00:00): Please do not add fictional features to the map, they will be removed.
Herman Lee (2022-06-03 07:19:02+00:00): 该名称应为文东街道，将此修改集退回
RVR004 (2022-06-12 18:31:46+00:00): 感謝你的更改， 以後我們將更為謹慎
喵耳引力波 (2022-06-11 03:17:52+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122233437

Local mapper had already noted that 2 name both vaild, if you think it only have 1 name you'd PM/comment to him.

Or I think you can do all changes in 1 changeset so that we can revert easily. XD
VLD547 (2022-06-16 08:52:07+00:00): 您好，我們團隊是 OSM 的新手，正在協助客戶進行 OSM 地圖資料編輯。我會參考這些回饋來調整未來的編輯方式，感謝您的建議。
Herman Lee (2022-06-03 07:53:43+00:00): 该修改集已退回
RVR004 (2022-06-12 18:32:40+00:00): 感謝你的更改， 以後我們將更為謹慎
喵耳引力波 (2022-06-11 03:19:19+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122233462
VLD547 (2022-06-16 08:52:13+00:00): 您好，我們團隊是 OSM 的新手，正在協助客戶進行 OSM 地圖資料編輯。我會參考這些回饋來調整未來的編輯方式，感謝您的建議。
Herman Lee (2022-06-03 08:13:16+00:00): 修改集已退回
Yunzhi (2022-06-07 06:12:09+00:00): 你好， 根据当地路名标识牌（位于两端路口处），以及资料调查，此修改集里的道路应是“圣文路”而非“冲孔路”
Herman Lee (2022-06-07 06:17:06+00:00): 我希望您能够私信上一版本的编辑者，谢谢
user_11435438 (2022-06-08 12:54:17+00:00): 的确在某些资料中（包括规划图、国营的天地图）和西湾大道路口的指示牌中名为圣文路。但是更多的路边路牌、指示牌、甚至是路灯编号中可以看到此路名为冲孔路。综合考虑，冲孔路出现得更多，更加符合在地原则。
相关影像：
https://s1.328888.xyz/2022/06/08/zvdDe.jpg
https://s1.328888.xyz/2022/06/08/zv2IX.jpg
https://s1.328888.xyz/2022/06/08/zv8jZ.jpg
https://s1.328888.xyz/2022/06/08/zv4zg.jpg
https://s1.328888.xyz/2022/06/08/zvHn1.jpg
Yunzhi (2022-06-09 02:12:23+00:00): 谢谢确认和分享详细的解释
MxxCon (2022-06-02 22:47:12+00:00): Same name or are they a chain? 🤔There's a similar location near me https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7073996513
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121832428
jmapb (2022-06-03 00:40:01+00:00): I'd imagine it's just a case of the same name. This one on Court Street is very un-branded -- the current sign is just a handwritten piece of paper hanging in the window.
Herman Lee (2022-06-03 08:14:48+00:00): 修改集已退回
RVR004 (2022-06-12 18:35:25+00:00): 感謝你的更改， 以後我們將更為謹慎確認
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2022-06-02 13:42:38+00:00): Hi. From the changeset comment, this polygone was not meant to be in your changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066004968/history Can you double-check? Thanks!

In the future consider splitting your changes by country: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Thanks in advance!
Kovoschiz (2022-06-02 09:26:17+00:00): `leisure=track` should be used for ones forming a circuit inside parks, not `=cycleway`.
rarad74 (2022-06-02 07:51:29+00:00): Salut. Te rog sa adaugi macar un comentariu succint la ceea ce editezi pe harta, ca sa putem vedea si noi ceilalti dintr-o privire ce ai facut acolo. De asemeni, este obligatoriu sa folosesti diacritice. Nu se folosesc majuscule la tot numele, ci doar la prima litera din nume.
Arianatech (2022-06-02 07:54:59+00:00): Ok
abakus_uploader (2022-06-02 22:31:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!