piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 11:10:06+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2558095986/history has barrier=g' that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
what this tag means? Is it maybe supposed to be barrier=gate? Or is maybe some other barrier?
OceanVortex (2024-02-01 12:53:11+00:00): Undoubtedly was a typo and should have been barrier=gate.
eggie (2021-01-01 13:21:03+00:00): Nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog...
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.


MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Warin61 (2017-03-26 21:49:59+00:00): Are these 'cycleways'? I think these would be more of a mtb track .. and those would be better tagged as a 'path' 'unpaved' with a relation 'route' 'mtb' 
If tagged as I suggest they would then appear on  https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=14!-32.5441!151.1371 as a route - highlighted with a right hand panel that you can get for a gpx track and elevation profile...
see https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=15!-35.1138!147.3059 for an example.
GavinX (2017-03-26 23:38:10+00:00): Can't get to this right now. Can fix in a week or so, however feel free to amend.
osmfix_2013 (2015-10-05 22:45:59+00:00): Your changeset contains wrong turn restriction(s).
Fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34457694
dominikMap (2016-02-27 18:18:57+00:00): What is the source data for proposed part of Konstytucyjna Road crossing Konstantyna?
Endres Pelka (2015-03-14 20:01:18+00:00): Nieładnie tak psuć relacje mezoregionów.
eggie (2019-06-04 19:00:34+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar noot een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
TheSwavu (2023-04-04 22:49:21+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3618657
luschi (2015-08-09 13:43:09+00:00): ist die Straße hier wirklich Einbahn?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50443709
OSMChris (2015-08-10 06:48:22+00:00): Hallo luschi, das ist effektiv keine Einbahnstraße! Habs richtig gestellt!
Martin Borsje (2018-08-04 12:01:30+00:00): Maurice,

Je hebt aan enkele van deze paden de NAAM MTB Route Park van Luna gegeven.

Dat is echter, denkelijk niet juist want de naam van de paden is niet zo (aangeduid met officiële naambordjes), maar de ROUTE loopt over deze paadjes.

Een (MTB) route dient in een routerelatie opgenomen te worden (die op de openfietskaart wel zichtbaar is en je ook in je Garmin kan laden...)

Wil je dit aanpassen? Laat weten of je hulp benodigd hebt.
Martin
osmfix_2013 (2015-10-05 22:42:56+00:00): Your changeset contains wrong turn restriction(s).
Fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34457962
Polarbear (2015-01-12 16:44:14+00:00): Wenn du einen "name:de=" einträgst, bitte nicht den "name=" löschen.
prokyon (2015-07-07 19:36:45+00:00): Hallo - das Verschieben der Bushaltestelle war vermutlich keine Absicht und sollte rückgängig gemacht werden?
tschild (2015-07-11 12:45:27+00:00): Soweit ich mich erinnere, beabsichtigte ich nicht eine Bushaltestelle zu verschieben. Sorry. Welche (welcher Knoten) war es?
prokyon (2015-07-12 17:35:38+00:00): Friedrich-Schiller-Gymnasium (Knoten 599192148)
prokyon (2015-08-15 22:39:48+00:00): Habe die Haltestelle zurückverschoben.
Prot D (2015-01-24 15:29:34+00:00): Hi, it seems you deleted the way 130543788, which formed a part of the boundary of two regions - multipolygons. This was a mistake I suppose? If so, I will undelete it... Thanks!
avena701 (2015-01-24 16:03:06+00:00): I'm sorry, I can't remember what I was mapping there. Thank you for cleaning up. Feel free to undelete ...
Prot D (2015-01-25 12:11:17+00:00): Ok, no problem, done.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-09 13:38:46+00:00): Hello Nadeau,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 8 years ago.  On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2561302571 here.  We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source. 
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SK53 (2016-06-28 11:38:53+00:00): I've changed the road to service as I don't believe it is maintained by local authority. As you have been there more recently than me you may know better, in which case revert my edit.
Vclaw (2016-06-28 12:43:08+00:00): I believe it is currently maintained by SNH, but is to be taken over by the Isle of Rum Community Trust sometime soon. Anyway, I think it is important as the only main road on the island, connecting the ferry to the village and all of the amenities. And it is effectively a public road. So tagging it as unclassified makes sense.
SK53 (2016-06-30 10:23:56+00:00): Hmm, when I visited I needed a permit from SNH or its predecessor (mind you the only way off the ferry was by dinghy). The island is effectively still a private estate (whether in hands of Bulloughs, NCC, SNH or a Community Trust) and should be mapped in a manner consistent with similar estates on the mainland.

See this statement on the IRCT website (http://www.isleofrum.com/contactandlinks.php) which clearly states that the road is private: 

Q. Can I take my car to Rum?
A. No. The roads in Kinloch Village are privately owned and managed by the local community. In line with the other Small Isles, visitors to Rum are not permitted to bring vehicles except under exceptional circumstances. People generally leave their cars parked at Mallaig or Arisaig while they visit Rum.
Vclaw (2016-07-01 01:41:07+00:00): The main restriction for cars is you won't be allowed on the ferry unless you have a permit. Same as for Eigg, Muck, Canna or Knoydart. For people living and working on the island, it is used as a public road. 
The road on Eigg is officially designated as an unclassified road (with a prohibition order on vehicles), the only real difference is it is adopted and maintained by Highland Council. 

The tag highway=unclassified is usually used for roads owned and maintained by the local authority, but I think there can be exceptions.
jcr83 (2023-01-03 16:14:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez déclaré le chemin 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249622242 en access=private. Cela m'étonne, car d'après la carte IGN TOP25, cette route est utilisée pour un itinéraire de petite randonnée (PR). Confirmez-vous l'accès privé ?
osmfix_2013 (2015-10-05 22:42:01+00:00): Your changeset contains wrong turn restriction(s).
Fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34458041
rwchhs (2017-03-01 23:09:48+00:00): Das ist nicht die Schule, das ist die Firma Effgen. Werde die entsprechenden Änderungen vornehmen
philippec (2020-01-19 17:57:20+00:00): Die brievenbus staat nu daar niet.
Ik zal proberen hem wat juister te zetten.
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/8Nhgx1BEcjHa9FCUM25peA
Felix Schütt (2017-01-03 14:18:03+00:00): Hallo,

ich wollte fragen, ob das Semikolon im Straßennamen Absicht war:

Bruderholzstrasse; Münchensteinerstr.

Es ist relativ schwer, solche Grenzfälle herauszufiltern. Ich würde dich bitten, sich für einen Straßennamen zu entscheiden. Ich bin allerdings nicht vor Ort, daher kann ich nicht entscheiden, welcher Name richtig ist.

MfG, Felix
datendelphin (2017-01-03 18:06:09+00:00): Das war vermutlich ein ausversehenes mergen zweier ways. In der History betrachtet: http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=19262160
Scheint so als ob es vorher beim Fluss den Namen gewechselt hat.
aaronsta (2015-01-03 15:31:20+00:00): Edit reverted. This is a friendly request that if you chose to edit in the future you consider the integrity of the map data. Make a website, use Facebook friends or other means to spread your website, not abusing community driven map content :)
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:59:57+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249856034
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:30:56+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107780369
thebeastmodo1 (2026-07-12 04:52:59+00:00): yes it is green hills with a space i do agree to you
GerdP (2015-10-29 18:54:32+00:00): please review node 2541717237:
What does highway=transint_signal
mean? Is it a typo? The tag is only used for this node.
osmfix_2013 (2015-10-05 22:41:21+00:00): Your changeset contains wrong turn restriction(s).
Fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34458069
Sanderd17 (2014-12-17 10:21:41+00:00): I admit I used the "name" tag wrongly (due to ignorance), but the tag did contain the destinations marked when you wanted to take the junction. (a bit like the exit_to tag)
mueschel (2018-10-28 19:21:26+00:00): Hallo,
das ist zwar schon lange her, aber ich verstehe dieses osmc:symbol nicht (und andere in der Gegend ebenso).
black:black:black_rectangle:A6:white
Das ist also ein schwarzes Rechteck auf schwarzem Grund - das kann man nicht erkennen. Wie sieht das denn in Wirklichkeit aus?

Grüße
Jan
pili-pili (2018-10-28 19:56:56+00:00): In Wirklichkeit ist das ein weißes A6 auf schwarzem Grund. Du kannst es auf https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/help/rendering/osmc ausprobieren. Ohne Hintergrund + Rechteck sieht es dort dämlich aus. Ja, das ist taggen für den Renderer, aber das ist ja der Sinn hinter dem osmc:symbol.
mueschel (2018-10-28 21:33:29+00:00): Ich kann keinen Unterschied zu
black:black::A6:white
erkennen - und logisch betrachtet sollte es auch keinen geben. Der Vordergrund darf leer gelassen werden wenn da nichts ist.
pili-pili (2018-10-29 07:30:54+00:00): Dann war das vor 5 Jahren vielleicht noch anders.
Scout Jens (2022-02-21 12:14:18+00:00): Hallo aps, Du bist in dem Gebiet bei Remchingen ja schon sehr lange aktiv. Aber Du kommentierst nie. Woher hast Du Deine Infos? Ich habe hier z.B. den Namen des Feldweges gelöscht, weil es keinen Anhaltspunkt für so einen Namen gibt. 
Viele Grüße, Jens
mueschel (2018-01-01 12:33:56+00:00): Hi,
I found a strange tag on two ways here:
parking:condition:right:maxspeed= 30 mph
I hope parked cars don't move at all :-)
Could you check that?

E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250098973

Cheers, Jan
Pink Duck (2018-01-01 15:37:29+00:00): Puzzling that, and rightly pointed out, so thanks. I've removed those curious tags from the two adjacent ways, given the existing speed limit is already 30 mph there (though due to change to 20 mph in April).
osmfix_2013 (2015-10-05 22:40:40+00:00): Your changeset contains wrong turn restriction(s).
Fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34458126
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-05-12 12:14:34+00:00): Hi , you mapped lots of little campsites around here, But are they all separate? Or are they all part of one big campsite?
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-08-26 07:20:28+00:00): Proszę, podaj źródła dla highway=proposed takich jak https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250191236 (dodaj informacje w polu source w drogach które są proponowane)
Sanniu (2017-01-24 11:04:14+00:00): No tags on lines - is it footpaths?
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-02-20 08:48:26+00:00): here you added a big untagged way ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250246300 ).  What's going on here?
josmougn (2017-11-21 21:37:19+00:00): bonjour,
pourquoi avoir passé ce chemin de path à footway ? 
Si les vélos peuvent passer il faudrait laisser path (car footway est interdit aux vélos) ou bien ajouter bicycle=yes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32085358
Merci
José
Socratestravels (2015-01-27 23:29:29+00:00): After consulting with fellow mapper Snusmumriken we thought against splitting the employment_agency node into multiple nodes since there is only 1 employment agency. This agency has different telephone hours, opening hours and self-service hours. Thanks though for your interest and willingness to do good.
pratikyadav (2015-09-24 12:31:53+00:00): Thank you for adding the details.
awesm (2019-06-26 07:16:37+00:00): what is the source tag link meant to be? it is now a broken link.
jidanni (2020-03-22 02:01:22+00:00): New revisions by the government,
https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/permalink/2916016378463812/
cyclist789 (2026-02-18 12:22:03+00:00): Skensved Å
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/18528055

Ifølge "Danske Stednavne" på https://kortoverblik.dk/spatialmap og SDFI Screenmap løber Skensved Å noget anderledes.
Er det okay, at jeg retter den efter dem istedet?
b-holdet (2026-02-18 17:16:46+00:00): Du behøver ikke at spørge ved så gamle rettelser.
Det er 12 år siden, og det er jo  ikke min data alene. Det er vores allesammens og er der fejl, så retter du bare.
cyclist789 (2026-02-18 19:46:20+00:00): Nogengange har folk kilder, der potentielt kunne være bedre end statens egne. Men jeg skal prøve at huske dette. Tak for svaret.
b-holdet (2026-02-19 04:51:05+00:00): Helt ok 👍
eggie (2018-12-30 09:06:59+00:00): Na lange tijd weer actief op OSM, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze alsnog  Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Graf Westerholt (2017-02-22 14:27:45+00:00): Warum hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2570269805 als Bank eingetragen?
Warin61 (2018-10-10 03:54:04+00:00): Hi,

For Way: 250644211 you have tagged landuse=scrub. 
Scrub is not a 'landuse', in OSM the tag to use is 'natural=scrub'.
Alex McKee (2018-10-10 16:29:02+00:00): The commit you have commented on is 5 years old. I usually look up the tag if unsure so I imagine the Wiki probably listed that at the time.
Alex McKee (2018-10-10 16:32:25+00:00): People like you discourage contributors. When I started mapping in this area for OSM there were hardly any roads shown, let alone landuse. I get some sort of nitpicking message like yours once every few months, remember that without early contributors, who may not have got everything quite right, there wouldn't be a map at all.
Warin61 (2018-10-10 21:23:43+00:00): I see it as 'housekeeping' - tiding up so that things are 'in order', conforming to present tagging practice. 

I was told that I have to contact each contributor to advise them of this potential mistake in tagging and the potential correct tag. That imposes a fair degree of work on all, myself I'd rather just change them. But on the other hand contact is good too. 

I do not believe OSM has 'everything quite right' now .. so I expect there may be changes in the future too, I hope there are - OSM should evolve.
Warin61 (2018-10-10 21:44:53+00:00): P.S I took a look at wayback machine for landuse=scrub .. https://web.archive.org/web/20110801000000*/https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dscrub 
No entry found there. If I could find an entry there then I might be able to justify an automatic change. 

From April 2009 I got https://web.archive.org/web/20110312002352/http://wiki.openstreetmap.org:80/wiki/Land_use_and_areas_of_natural_land

And that has natural=scrub, no landuse=scrub.
SomeoneElse (2016-01-19 13:04:27+00:00): Just in case you haven't spotted it, someone has added http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/500708 about http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250656700 which was added here.
d1g (2014-12-22 13:51:07+00:00): Shoorick против удаления отношения 1430887.

Я против удалений без обсуждения с авторами.

Документация сломалась:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A7%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8F%D0%B1%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8C#.D0.A1.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.BC.D0.BA.D0.B8_.D0.B2.D1.8B.D1.81.D0.BE.D0.BA.D0.BE.D0.B3.D0.BE_.D1.80.D0.B0.D0.B7.D1.80.D0.B5.D1.88.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B8.D1.8F
d1g (2015-08-29 06:43:26+00:00): _area=yes?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250698312
sir-mapalot (2015-09-06 00:20:08+00:00): Tags dropped, thanks for noticing.
каракал (2015-12-28 18:04:19+00:00): НЕ ОДИН НОМЕР ДОМА НЕ СООТВЕТСТВУЕТ
SomeoneElse (2021-11-15 13:04:12+00:00): Just for info - I've merged the ways in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3367263 into 3131984 (it's part of the same route).
opottone (2016-12-23 05:37:48+00:00): Seems a bit unusual that all tracks leading to a passenger station (Bognor Regis) have yard and siding tags.
osmfix_2013 (2015-10-05 22:47:37+00:00): Your changeset contains wrong turn restriction(s).
Fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34457495
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-03 08:38:16+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2571734437/history has shop = pet_supply that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=pet_supply ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=pet ? If yes, what is the difference?

Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?  Or maybe it is so obvious duplicate that I should have replaced it with an automatic edit rather than making a note?
yxoc (2024-05-04 07:46:15+00:00): Hello, I don't remember as this was more than 10 years ago. The wiki page of shop=pet says that this is also for shops selling supplies so feel free to change to shop=pet.

-yxoc
GerdP (2015-10-28 18:31:08+00:00): please review:
I found a few nodes with highway=roundabout.
Some of them are obviously junction=roundabout (obstacle in the middle), others maybe highway=mini_roundabout.
I am not sure what node 603858193 is.
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout#How_to_map
dikkeknodel (2018-04-30 15:00:49+00:00): Hi Romolo,

You have mentioned in as a note in the BI 15 relation that www.bicitalia.org should be consulted when changing the relation. Reading this in a relation that is 4 years old I would expect that the relation would be actively maintained by www.bicitalia.org. However, when I compare this relation's content with http://www.bicitalia.org/it/bicitalia/gli-itinerari-bicitalia/140-bi15-ciclovia-svizzera-mare then I can only conclude that there is no active maintenance since only 20% of the route is in the route relation after all these years. 

Do you agree that this note does not longer make sense and should be removed?

Kind regards,
dikkeknodel

P.S. I bumped into this because I am planning to cycle the section Locarno - Mergozzo of the BI-15 in a few months. This section is not yet mapped in OSM. When I have cycled it I want to update the route relation with that information.
dikkeknodel (2018-04-30 16:01:34+00:00): Romosola agreed via PM.
Sanniu (2017-01-12 08:40:31+00:00): Look like you added some areas without other tags (e.g. Way: 250927015), should them be removed or you can add tags to them?
Nakaner (2015-07-30 14:59:39+00:00): Schifferstadt (an der Altstrecke) hat H/V-Signale. Weshalb hast du dort Ks-Signale erfasst? Siehe auch mein Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9lcggL4jTw

Ich habe diesen Signalen nicht das Präfix DE-ESO:* gegeben, weil sie in meinen Augen falsch sind.
rayquaza (2015-10-19 12:45:32+00:00): Hast recht, hab' mich vermutlich verklickt oder so. Magst du umtaggen? Bei mir würde es vermutlich länger dauern bis ich dazu komme ;-)
rayquaza (2015-10-30 07:38:54+00:00): Ging dann überraschend doch schneller und wird heute erledigt sein :-)
jidanni (2019-10-21 02:03:31+00:00): Dongxin Village / Yuening Village 界有誤。
見 https://maps.nlsc.gov.tw
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-25 11:49:31+00:00): co to jest za zmiana, do francy jasnej? czemu place=village zostało zmienione na place=yes??
RicoElectrico (2023-12-24 23:08:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2199388
eggie (2022-07-14 20:53:00+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen. Daarom opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
neoLithos (2022-08-26 07:39:02+00:00): Hallo Stadt Meißen.

Eine Frage: Könnt ihr mir helfen - wo habt ihr die Hausnummer 20a an der Garage gefunden?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251121155

Viele Grüße, neoLithos
neoLithos (2022-08-26 07:53:30+00:00): Falls Ihr es nicht mehr wisst, würde ich es einfach löschen. :)
Viele Grüße.
Sandal man (2021-08-24 15:25:05+00:00): Hoi Marc, hopelijk weet jij nog wat dit grondgebruik is :-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251127462#map=16/37.3268/-4.6302

Groeten Jan
marczoutendijk (2021-08-24 17:29:28+00:00): Ja, dat weet ik! Het is hetzelfde als het omringende gebied: landuse=orchard.
In die tijd gebruikte ik BING, maar PNOA is nu de norm. Ik heb het gecorrigeerd.
Sandal man (2021-08-24 18:09:21+00:00): Top, ook weer opgelost, ik probeer Spanje zo foutloos mogelijk te maken maar niet elke mapper reageerd zo snel als jij helaas.
Maar blijf mijn best doen :-)
letihu (2021-12-22 19:08:46+00:00): Dieser Punkt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2574218898/history
erscheint mir sehr seltsam.
Toliman (2021-12-24 19:31:02+00:00): Hier liegt eine Aufschleifung einer Leitung ohne Verwendung eines Abzweigmasten vor.
letihu (2021-12-24 22:37:09+00:00): Dann sage ich Osmose mal: Das gehört so ;-)
Vielen Dank für die Info.
dieterdreist (2015-09-25 07:56:39+00:00): ist der Rossmann ins UG umgezogen? Als ich den gemappt habe war er noch oben, bilde ich mir ein.
naoliv (2015-02-17 17:09:31+00:00): pdnzjr, de onde você importou esses dados?
pdnzjr (2015-06-09 04:41:49+00:00): Olá naoliv, boa noite. Desulpe por não te responder antes pois não leio este email com frequência.

Na verdade, fiz uns tracks e juntamente com uns folders (mapa dos lotes) na epoca que a loteadora deste bairro tava divulgando vendas de lote, juntamente com as imagens Bing e um grande mapa que fica na parede de um estabelecimento na area central daqui de naviraí que me possibilitou estas edições.  O que complicou um pouco é que na época foi tudo editado no programa gpsmapedit. Daí que vi que o osm tava ampliando as atualizações, não conhecia o Josm, converti de mp para osm via programa Global Mapper. Daí conforme foi discutido no forum, ficaram umas tags nada a ver, entao, reeditei excluido as tags excedentes. 
Não se se ficou esclarecido, mas estou aberto para instruções para não cometer esta falha novamente.

Desculpe o transtorno.

Att,

Paulo
gendy54 (2016-12-23 16:13:56+00:00): Bonjour,

Je viens de tomber sur ce tracé de parcours. Merci de le revoir. Le tracé n'est pas propre.
neuhausr (2015-02-10 14:33:30+00:00): Why did you change Aldens Corners to an isolated dwelling (wiki: "Smallest kind of human settlement. No more than 2 households.")? it clearly has more than two residences. Looks like you've done the same with other places tagged hamlet too.
MidwestMapGeek (2015-02-14 05:35:07+00:00): Aldens Corners and Elvers, while they have more than two households, are very small and aren't even referred to by any name; thefore I believe they fit more as an isolated dwelling. Looking at Aldens Corners, there are only about 5 households, but they are somewhat scattered, relatively speaking. Elvers only has 5-6 homes, and it's not really a community, it's just a slightly more dense part of the Town of Vermont. It doesn't really have an identity. At least for my interpretation of the tag, an isolated dwelling can basically apply to any place that has a name but is really nothing more than a few homes clustered together. When I think of the hamlet tag, I think of more of a community. It doesn't necessarily have to be larger, but these are just really clusters of homes- not communities. I can change them back to hamlets if you really think they should be, but there was an actual thought process that went on regarding these- it wasn't just me being careless.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-20 06:35:51+00:00): Hello!

In unlikely case that you remember it or can visit this location.

What was meant in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2575684557/history by shop=company?

Have you meant office of a company, nowadays typically tagged as office=company - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dcompany ?
Matthias Frank (2023-03-23 21:58:50+00:00): Hello!
I now corrected to "office=company". Thanks.
eggie (2020-05-01 15:25:33+00:00): Na Jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvagen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie