piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Futur3r (2021-06-02 15:08:01+00:00): Attention à la voirie !

Pour le POI, le tag service:bicycle:rental=yes démontrait déjà qu'on peut louer des vélo !
Le tag shop=* signifiait que c'est un magasin de vélo qui fait aussi de la location.

Merci de bien faire attention avant de téléverser tes données ! 
La documentation est à privilégier. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service:bicycle:rental
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105725606
canfe (2021-06-02 17:49:47+00:00): Secondo me i portici di Piazza dell'Annunziata non sono in porfido ma in paving stones.
Almeno, a memoria mi ricordo così, ma saran almeno 2 anni che non ci passo.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface%3Dpaving_stones
Rogoyski (2021-06-02 21:30:29+00:00): Zrobiłeś przecięcia między drogą i chodnikami na powierzchni a antresolą stacji metra Centrum, łącznie z przejściem dla pieszych na jednym z nich. Antresola nie powinna mieć poza tym layer=1.
Rom1 (2021-06-02 16:48:06+00:00): Bonjour, dans le département de Meurthe-et-Moselle, la vitesse est limitée à 80 km/h et non 90 km/h. Je vous laisse corriger ? Merci.
SekeRob (2021-06-02 16:42:05+00:00): Is it bowls or is it bocce? Bocce is a valid sport to select.

cheers
SekeRob (2021-06-17 19:23:51+00:00): On June 16, 2021 some 12 wise old men at the pitch told me it's bocce played here, but they were not allowed to use it because of some COVID-19 restriction. Also the surface of the pitch is not sand, rather some compacted material making it near as smooth as billards. Oh and tagged it as 'inner' to the 'scrub' area, which I'll shortly will retag as managed forest or wood, those are serious mature pine trees for all of the scrub strip through to where Campo Druda is.

cheers.
pippo6 (2021-06-27 17:22:33+00:00): - Thank you for retagging, yes I witnessed the pétanque and am removing bowls.

- The sports pitch area is now OUTside the forest, because "inner" stands for "my border is this other feature's inner demarcation border".

I don't think this reflects the reality - what happens in the sports pitch area is still said to happen "inside" the forest.

Otherwise everything on OSM would have to be "inner" of something.

A courtyard is usually an "inner" of a building (relation 12747849) because recovering a ball fallen in a courtyard requires exiting the building.
pippo6 (2021-06-27 17:30:59+00:00): Eh, not pétanque, bocce sorry. I hate these tags.
SekeRob (2021-06-27 17:31:25+00:00): DONT change the inner / outer, your logic goes wildly beyond how OSM works. Simple, an area fully enveloped by a bigger one needs doing this as e.g. a pond inside a forest would then render with water and trees growing in it.
pippo6 (2021-06-27 19:01:21+00:00): Thank you. I asked for an explanation in the ML and will not touch it.
Camello_AR (2021-06-02 18:27:59+00:00): Hola, te consulto porque usas una errónea descripción del conjunto de cambios. Si el mapeo es en Argentina, usas las indicaciones #MapPyOSM y mapeando paraguay.

Saludos
Paz Echauri (2021-06-02 18:44:34+00:00): Hola, estoy mapeando para una organización que utiliza la etiqueta de MapPyOSM, no significa que esté mapeando Paraguay, si necesito cambiar la etiqueta, me decís por cual por favor, gracias.
Camello_AR (2021-06-03 00:39:08+00:00): No debería decir Paraguay sino el país correcto. Y cada conjunto de cambios debe tratar de indicar en forma clara que se modifica (si son árboles, si son edificios, etc)
Paz Echauri (2021-06-03 01:59:05+00:00): En mi organización me pidieron utilizar esta etiqueta para poder identificarme, entonces si me podes decír por favor exactamente que etiqueta querés que utilice para cambiar, si no, máximo lo que puedo cambiar es el Paraguay por argentina, pero el resto dejo igual
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 14:56:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108565276, 108568002 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mixture of edits that includes fantasy mapping and border vandalism.  Numerous attempts to engage with the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5233 et al.
Tomas Straupis (2021-06-02 19:12:27+00:00): Blogai. Visiškai sugadintas buvęs geras žymėjimas :-(
PovilasJ (2021-06-02 19:29:12+00:00): O kas būtent netinka? Gal galima konkrečiau?
Tomas Straupis (2021-06-02 19:51:02+00:00): Matau pagadintą dviračių/pėsčiųjų takų žymėjimą. Čia detaliau surašyta, kaip reikėtų žymėti:
https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai
Dabar esamos atkarpos su highway=path+foot=designated+bicycle=designated yra pakeistos į footway, taip panaikinant dviračių lygiateisiškumą.
PovilasJ (2021-06-02 21:10:48+00:00): Ačiū Tomai už laiką skirtą pagalbai! Kai yra dviračių takas viskas aišku, bet kaip tokio nėra man kyla klausimas.
Changeset #102855228
Tags:footway=sidewalk+highway=footway+bicycles=Not specified
Šalia yra pėsčiųjų takas: Changeset #59704864
Tags:highway=footway+foot=designated+bicycles=Not specified.
Lieka tik Kapsų g. kurioje dviračiui leidžiama važiuoti. Klausimas kai yra pėsčiųjų takas (footway, foot=designated) ar nereikia žymėti bicycle=yes? Tokiu atveju kelias skirtas pėstiesiems, tačiau leidžiama ir dviračiu važiuoti. Juk pėsčiųjų taku leidžiama važiuoti jei nėra dvirtakio ar kelio.
Tomas Straupis (2021-06-03 05:49:22+00:00): Pėsčiųjų takuose visada leidžiama važiuoti dviračiais (išskyrus jei greta yra dviračių takas), tai bicycle=yes kaip ir nereikalingas. Jei turim highway=footway, tai iš karto reiškia, kad foot=designated, tai nereikia foot=designated dėti. Dedam tik tada, kai takas yra specialiai darytas IR dviračiams, IR pėstiesiems, tada kelias gauna generic žymą highway=path ir paskirtį nurodom dviem foot|bicycle=designated.
Nielkrokodil (2021-06-27 16:32:23+00:00): Hallo mmxmmx,

ist die Utendorfgasse auch für Fahrräder eine Einbahn geworden? 

lg
Nielkrokodil
mmxmmx (2021-06-27 22:24:03+00:00): Bisher keine Ausnahme gesehen (ich bin gelegentlich in der Gegend).
SomeoneElse (2021-07-25 14:57:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108565276, 108568002 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mixture of edits that includes fantasy mapping and border vandalism.  Numerous attempts to engage with the mapper have failed.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5233 et al.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-20 20:27:26+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4920778 ?
SomeoneElse (2021-06-05 13:10:36+00:00): Hello Google nature,

You've deleted a peak here - can you explain why?  Lots of other people had contributed to it - you can see that at http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=2669903811 .

Also, please always use changeset comments that explain what you did and why.  "a" is not a good changeset comment.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more details.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-06-05 13:11:05+00:00): Olá, natureza do Google,

Você excluiu um pico aqui - pode explicar por quê? Muitas outras pessoas contribuíram para isso - você pode ver isso em http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=2669903811.

Além disso, sempre use comentários do changeset que expliquem o que você fez e por quê. "a" não é um bom comentário sobre o changeset. Veja https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments para mais detalhes.
Cumprimentos,
Andy
iandees (2021-06-02 16:02:08+00:00): Please be careful when you're editing so that you don't inadvertently move data around while you're moving the screen around. It looks like you did that a few times in this and I'll fix it for you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105729086
WoodWoseWulf (2021-06-03 21:27:44+00:00): Hi Mallory M,

OSM is a public map. Please avoid adding personal information such as "MY HOUSE"
luiswoo (2021-06-03 07:00:09+00:00): В принципе, можно было сократить до «Кугей — М4 «Дон»», а не сносить всё название.
user_12458445 (2021-06-03 09:43:31+00:00): скорректировал, спасибо
ortho_is_hot (2021-07-02 07:05:35+00:00): Hi, I've deleted these cartpaths in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107294146 as the roads already exist and aren't cartpaths.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
Prusaker (2021-06-03 13:06:52+00:00): Скажите, может есть фото, чтобы посмотреть как организовали движение? А то сейчас на карте сделано совсем запутанно. Я бы посмотрел что к чему и поправил бы.

У меня самого есть видео с регистратора, но они прошлогодние.
rempshaener (2021-06-03 10:04:29+00:00): Teilrevert mit 105769628: Der Fußweg liegt innerhalb des Rückhaltebeckens https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678925244 und würde bei entsprechender Niederschlagsmenge geflutet
ilias_ (2025-12-08 01:46:20+00:00): si rachid vous nous avez rempli la map de poteaux métalliques ajoutés en tant que bureaux, un grand bravo
felipeeugenio (2021-06-02 21:02:31+00:00): Estimado. Convirtió un camino entero en una reja. Mas cuidado con las ediciones.
Ya fue corregido.

saludos
Keima (2021-06-03 07:14:18+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Concernant votre demande de relecture:
-Pour un ou plusieurs médecins généralistes l'attribut est "amenity=doctors" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Ddoctors). Le champ "description" ne permet pas un traitement automatique par les ré-utilisateurs de données. 

Bonne continuation,
Mashin (2021-06-02 17:42:37+00:00): Hi ogrategames and thanks for your contribution.

I just have to correct you that this is not how we map roads/paths. The correct way is to draw a single line along the center of the paved area as you can already see at the parking area.

Second issue is that when mapping green and fairway areas those should not overlap. Please see this section in documentation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
ogrategames (2021-06-02 20:38:18+00:00): Hi Mashin,

Thank you for your comment and advice. I will continue to map the course in the correct way. 

PS - thank you for one heck of a time saver with mapping the roadways/pathways. SO much easier than trying to box in a narrow road!
Jose Luis Infante (2021-06-02 17:16:12+00:00): Hola,
gracias por la edición, aunque hay cosas que corregir. Una pregunta: físicamente el bolardo está en el camino que se ha marcado como "access=no" o en el que está, que no tiene restricciones de acceso?
Un saludo!
Juan Carlos del Pino García (2021-06-04 21:19:21+00:00): Así es. Es el camino donde he marcado como prohibido, a la izquierda del que continúa. Han colocado una valla metálica, una señal de prohibido y una señal de obligación de seguir (señales de tránsito como las de las carreteras) por el camino que venimos. Alguien que por la causa que sea a cortado el acceso,  no parece ninguna acción oficial, sino más bien a nivel particular.
literan (2021-06-02 20:30:29+00:00): зачем-то вы тут подземный трубопровод к наземной дороге присоединили. Будьте внимательнее, пожалуйста. Исправлю
Igor Gurzhuenko (2021-06-02 22:02:04+00:00): Тут это где? Не вижу конткретики в вашем комментарии. Квадрат на пол Истринского района.

Все мои правки осуществляются на основе личного опыта посещения мест и на основе треков с моего велокомпьюера Garmin 1030. Обращение к моей "невнимательности" тут не совсем понятны.
literan (2021-06-03 06:51:31+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#105731195

трубопровод на пол-района, соединили с дорогой (к западу от Бужарово). Если вы это сделали не по невнимательности, а сознательно, то это плохо :=)
Igor Gurzhuenko (2021-06-03 08:42:18+00:00): Я так и не понял о чём вы... Я скорректировал положение автодороги после её недавнего ремонта. Никаких трубопроводов я не трогал.
literan (2021-06-03 08:51:54+00:00): если увеличить место пересечения трубопровода и дороги, то видно, что в старом положении дорог (более темная и толстая полоска) она не имела общих точек с трубопроводом. После вашей правки (новое положение дороги, смещенное в этом месте чуть на восток), они имеют общую точку. 

Ладно, проехали.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-06-07 11:40:07+00:00): Hallo blauloke,

den Shelter hast du eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8792501101

Aber es gibt direkt daneben schon diesen Shelter: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1338004605

Kannst du das bitte noch mal überprüfen?

Und, ich bin mir nicht sicher, aber kann es sein, dass du Gebäude löscht und dann den Shelter nur als Node einträgst? Wenn schon ein Gebäude vorhanden ist, den Shelter bitte ans Gebäude hängen.

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
blauloke (2021-06-07 17:41:00+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe vergessen die alte Hütte zu löschen. Diese wurde abgerissen und durch eine neue ersetzt. Deshalb habe ich einen neuen Note erstellt.

Eigentlich mache ich es so wie du beschreibst, wenn ein Gebäude vorhanden ist hänge ich den Shelter an den Umriss. Durch deine Frage bin ich jetzt verunsichert, ob ich doch mal anders verfahren bin. Da habe ich jetzt keine Erinnerung daran.

Servus, blauloke
Ze0zohk1 (2021-06-09 05:11:35+00:00): Hallo blauloke, dann ist ja gut. Ich hatte in diesem CS gesehen, dass du ein Gebäude gelöscht hast. Aber ich finde es schwer in einem CS nachzuvollziehen, was getan wurde.

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
olo81 (2021-06-07 07:11:12+00:00): Czy ścieżka została oznakowana? 
Jeśli od zeszłego roku nic się nie zmieniło to jest teraz błędnie otagowana!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/139321239
delexi91 (2022-03-07 22:41:59+00:00): Hallo Temotokatate, bist du dir sicher, dass du addr:place hier richtig benutzt? Im Wiki steht "Kein Objekt sollte addr:place=* und addr:street=* gleichzeitig haben."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr:place?uselang=de
delexi91 (2022-03-07 22:49:42+00:00): Ich glaube addr:housename passt hier besser.
osm915 (2023-03-14 18:16:08+00:00): Hallo Κώστας, 
almost two years have passed since you added "the soon to be constructed North Cretan" motorway A90. When do you expect the building phase of it is going to start? 
I looked for signs of construction in a few places between Skepasti and Georgioupoli a few months ago and could not find any.

What do you think about changing the tagging from "highway=construction" to "highway=proposed" or "proposed:highway=motorway"?
(Please have a look at https://osm.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction and https://osm.org/wiki/Key:proposed)

Happy mapping!
osm915 (2023-03-21 20:34:32+00:00): Hi Kostas
thanks a lot for your reply via direct message!

What you write sounds to me like the construction will most likely have to wait "some more years".
So I come back to my main question/suggestion: What do you think about changing "construction" to "proposed"?

Did you have a look at the links I included in my comment?

Best regards!
Константин Гам (2021-06-03 12:32:29+00:00): По какой причине вы убираете внесённые данные о полосности, освещённости и скоростях которые мы собирали кропотливо и вносили в базу?
Плагин reverter создан для явно других случаев. Верните утерянные данные на место пожалуйста.
xronos (2021-06-03 14:18:25+00:00): ёрничать тут не стоит. вы внесли такие изменения, что осталось ощущение, будто вы хотели кому-то насолить (мне?). разбираться со всей этой ерундой не хотелось. изучите вики, ведь очевидно что вы в неё не заглядываете
Glassman (2021-06-03 18:15:43+00:00): #TIP: Driveways by their use are private so adding the tag doesn't do much other than prevent routers from giving direction to the end of the driveway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105733023
Константин Гам (2021-06-03 12:28:24+00:00): Это что за вандальные удаления данных? class:bicycle очень полезный тег, не надо удалять ТЕГИ!
xronos (2021-06-03 14:10:20+00:00): вы явно не понимаете его смысла. что вы хотели сказать, добавив его к шоссе?
xronos (2021-06-03 15:58:12+00:00): что для одних участников ТЕГИ для других просто теги... Вас же раздражает _наличие_ тур-юнайт. А меня раздражает _отсутствие_. Поэтому и конфликты. Но с моей точки зрения лучше разнообразие, чем отсутствие
woodpeck (2021-06-30 09:58:13+00:00): In this changeset which you claim is sourced from Bing imagery, you added a new "Taormina Reserve Park" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949773696). Since neither the name nor the extent of this "park" can come from Bing imagery - what is the source of this information?
Polarbear-repair (2021-07-01 07:38:35+00:00): various objects verified as fiction
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105733091
Jrachi (2021-08-11 16:46:12+00:00): Ciao.
Hai messo un bridge=acqueduct non connesso ad alcunché
A vedere le foto aeree mi sembra sia un ponte pedonale per arrivare alla casa a sud.

Ivo
PaoloLombardi (2021-08-12 12:04:25+00:00): Ciao
sì sono ponti per il solo acquedotto e assolutamente NON pedonabili perché anche chiusi da un apposito cancello.
Li ho messi perché sono comunque dei punti di riferimento per la navigazione. Ovviamente è impossibile collegarli a qualcosa poiché le tubazioni scorrono chissà dove sotto terra. Un saluto.
Jrachi (2021-08-12 13:02:46+00:00): Ok. Ho guardato meglio ed il secondo non ha proprio niente di collegabile.
Brutto da vedere. Ma magari qualcuno troverà la maniera di inserire il resto della condotta...

Ivo
PaoloLombardi (2021-08-12 17:53:10+00:00): Negativo sono "ponti" messi lì in mezzo al nulla senza alcun tipo di collegamento nonostante siano vicini alle strade. Eventualmente per un fatto "estetico" si può mettere comunque un highway pedonale con cancello e divieto di transito. Ma non mi assumo questa responsabilità :-)
Andrea Musuruane (2021-06-03 08:33:34+00:00): Ciao Ferruccio. Ho parecchi dubbi su questi cambiamenti in tourism=museum perché nessuno di questi è un museo. Mi sembravano meglio prima con tourism=attraction. Ciao, Andrea
canfe (2021-06-04 07:42:01+00:00): Tourism=attraction è un sub tag di un tag che dice che attrazione è.
Di attrazione c'è ben poco dopo una visita sul campo.
Anche a me il tag museo non mi ha entusiasmato, ma è il meno peggio. Servirebbe un tag che indichi una esposizione (semi) temporanea. però art gallery mi è sembrato eccessivo.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-06-04 07:45:41+00:00): Perché dovrebbe essere sempre un subtag? "In some cases it is used alone, without another main feature tag, for a feature which is designed as a tourist attraction" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction
canfe (2021-06-05 10:16:53+00:00): ma la frase continua con: "... or "tourist trap", for example"!
E mi sembra un caso simile, forse non voluto con malizia.
Inoltre come da wiki citata non siamo nemmeno lontanamente vicini agli standard spiegati https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourist_attraction
Infine mettere solo tourism=attraction senza specificare di che attrazione è, diventa fuorviante per l'utilizzatore.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-06-06 11:06:25+00:00): Non mi sembra rilevante in questa discussione che _anche_ le "tourist trap" siano etichettate con tourism=attraction. Il pellegrino è un particolare tipo di turista. Le gallerie ex voto rientrano tra le cose che a cui questa figura è interessata. Sicuramente la classificazione attuale in tourism=museum è errata.
canfe (2021-06-08 07:50:18+00:00): Allora attraction anche ai gabinetti perché i pellegrini ne sono attratti. :-)
Le belle esposizioni di ex voto potrebbero essere allora mese come tourism=gallery.
Ma la sala Frassati no. Sarebbe una "esposizione", singola sala, ma non trovo tale tag.
Comunque alcune "attrazioni" son così importanti che non son nemmeno citate dal sito ufficiale del Santuario.
Mentre altre son classificate sì come museo:
https://www.santuariodioropa.it/ex-voto/
SekeRob (2025-08-14 08:13:33+00:00): Hi Stefano,

In 2021 you mapped several areas seaward from the coast near Silvi Marina which according to the history of e.g. this node. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170401369#map=18/42.540044/14.136824 were mapped by you with the rather meaningless 'aggiornamento'. You say your source was Bing+gpx. The problem is, there's nothing in Esri, Esri Clarity, Bing to confirm these coastal outcrops are real, no groyne, no breakwater  (frangiflutti), no revetments. This suggests your mapping per GPX data file drawing was faulty. Can you confirm as then these outcrops from the coast need removal.

Thanks for your prompt response.
SekeRob
literan (2021-06-02 20:26:33+00:00): я не устану исправлять. Это не линки на развязке двух автодорог, а встречное направление Челобитьевского шоссе.
maraf24 (2021-06-06 16:25:46+00:00): Teren i fundamenty dawnego budynku to nie jest archeological_site.
Poza tym wszystko jest zakopane na prywatnych działkach przeznaczonych pod zabudowę. W tym dwie są już zabudowane.
jneutron (2021-06-02 20:07:33+00:00): Oops, newbie error. The comments for this changeset refer only to way 949779854. The edits to the other ways (all of which were just changing road tags for consistency with other ways in the area) were inadvertently combined in the same changeset. Still learning how to use Potlatch ;)
eggie (2021-06-02 21:23:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mariotomo (2021-06-02 20:06:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105739040

you had created both objects on the default layer 0 (implicit).  I put the roof on layer 1 to solve the highway/building conflict.  with this changeset, by putting also the highway in layer 1 you put the conflict back in the database.

si quieres ayuda para el uso correct de la etiqueta `layer`, tenemos un grupo de apoyo en Telegram.
Strubbl (2021-06-02 19:02:15+00:00): Hi jayjayjoe, vielen Dank für deinen ersten Beitrag. Es sieht so aus als wäre hier auch eine ungewollte Änderung dabei. Schau mal auf den Verlauf der Grillparzerstraße. Die geht nun einmal durchs Gebäude.
Strubbl (2021-06-02 19:07:51+00:00): Mit dem CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105736597 habe ich das rückgängig gemacht.

Was ist TagMond GmbH für eine Firma? Diese Info würde ich noch an den Punkt hinzufügen. Schreibe am besten hier einen Kommentar (siehe Link unten in dieser Mail) oder suche entsprechendes bitte aus: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
jayjayjoe (2021-06-03 12:56:31+00:00): Ah das mit der Straße war mein fehler. Danke für das beheben
Strubbl (2021-06-03 14:47:49+00:00): Das geht mit dem Webeditor leider schneller als man will, dass man beim durch die Karte scrollen einen Punkt anfasst und verschiebt. Wenn dir das mal passieren sollte und du das mitbekommst, kannst du oben rechts auf den Button mit dem Pfeil zurück diese ungewollte Änderung rückgängig machen
Lee Carré (2022-03-15 18:26:21+00:00): Possible retagging:
female=only
Glassman (2021-06-03 22:17:17+00:00): #TIP: Zoom in before you start to edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105735070
gscscnd (2021-06-03 07:06:15+00:00): amenity=parking_space powinno być wewnątrz amenity=parking (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking_space).
Glassman (2021-06-03 18:17:41+00:00): #TIP: The original service road took vehicles under the roof of the gas pumps. I've never been there but I'm guessing that it's not a building but a roof. It's typically how we tag most gas stations. Can you relook at this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105735914
SHARCRASH (2021-06-02 19:29:55+00:00): put back trails*
joost schouppe (2022-01-29 14:51:18+00:00): There's a lot of use of this path visible on strava. Is the path blocked or is there just a sign? I think perhaps we should ask the municipality about this, maybe the signs are not legal. Especially since the governement also seems to consider a section I just added as a normal path (between here and Open Luchtlaan)
JonathanGold (2022-01-30 10:36:03+00:00): Agree about use of this path on Strava... It's Strava that led me to this path. It was not a sign but a fence that blocks the way.