piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:31:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Glassman (2022-09-29 15:19:07+00:00): What makes this road private? The county doesn't show it as a private road.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126782605
CarlosFigueira (2022-09-29 17:03:15+00:00): There is a barrier at the road, and a sign by the side saying it's a private driveway - https://imgur.com/IYj1qE8

Where can I find the road information from the county? Thanks!
Glassman (2022-09-29 18:14:26+00:00): Thanks for the info - looks like King County isn't accurate. I removed the section of 226th Ave SE that hasn't been built and added a service road in place.

I use the counties iMap. https://kingcounty.gov/services/gis/Maps/imap.aspx. They also have some great open data you can download at https://gis-kingcounty.opendata.arcgis.com/pages/download-gis-data
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-30 21:22:05+00:00): هذه خريطة عامة أرجوا منكم عدم إضافة أماكنك الشخصية إلى الخريطة العامة واستخدم البرامج الشخصية لحفظ أماكنك الشخصية
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
ToniE (2022-09-29 14:43:26+00:00): Hi Michael,

willkommen bei OSM.

landuse= haben keine (postalische) Adresse. nur Häuser und einzelne Grundstücke haben das.

addr:city ist hier also falsch.

Früher gab's mal 'is_in', aber das wurde als veraltet definiert und großflächig/automatisiert entfernt.

Viele Grüße
Toni
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-29 14:16:45+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=35.709647%2C-82.006166%2C16.81
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-29 15:29:47+00:00): Dag edwin.. Je voegt een laadpaal toe waar al een laadpaal op de kaart staat?
Klopt dat wel?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-29 15:32:27+00:00): Je laadpaal naast Greenflux  geschikt voor twee auto's heb ik verwijderd. 
MVG
eggie
Edwin Lijnzaad (2022-10-02 10:48:48+00:00): Dag Eggie,
Ik denk dat ik die laadpaal heb toegevoegd in maps.me. Ik had me niet gerealiseerd dat hun kaartmateriaal achter zou kunnen lopen. Voortaan zal ik het rechtstreeks in openstreetmap doen. Dat lijkt me betrouwbaarder.
Dank voor het meekijken,
Edwin
eggie (2022-10-02 11:05:19+00:00): No problem... 😀
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
parukhin (2022-11-19 22:50:14+00:00): Коллеги, здравствуйте.
Я немного не понимаю где вы берёте информацию для импорта?
Дочки-Сыночки закрываются по всей стране, в витринах уже стоит эльдорадовская  техника и тут рокетдата восстанаввливает месяц как закрытый магазин.
Проверьте, пожалуйста, что вы ещё так восстановили по стране.
arik123max (2022-10-02 12:18:54+00:00): There are multiple instances in which you deleted existing buildings with addresses and other data already assigned, if you really need to remove parts of building at least modify the part with all the data assigned.
You also should not modify building with source=kapor2 as those are imported from slovak cadastral portal, and are much more accurate than if you just draw them. 
You should add cadastre layer to your editor and draw buildings according to that where possible.

wms_endpoint:https://kataster.skgeodesy.sk/eskn/services/NR/kn_wms_orto/MapServer/WmsServer  source=ZBGIS

There are also instances where you changed building type to yes from already assigned value, if you don't have a good reason for it, please don't do it.
MiroJanosik (2022-10-02 17:32:05+00:00): arik123max: I think that with "instances" you meant "changesets".
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-29 15:23:44+00:00): Dag Douwe.. Wat je ook hebt gedaan is de adresnode 	Roosje Vosstraat 8 verplaatst naar een ander deel van Spijkenisse.. Waarschijnlijk door schuiven met de kaart in editmodus.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126784891

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-29 15:25:11+00:00): Adresnode teruggeplaatst
eggie (2022-09-29 15:27:23+00:00): Een eerste edit in Nederland, mar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen... bij deze alsnog
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
abakus_uploader (2022-09-29 22:31:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Glassman (2022-10-01 23:49:39+00:00): already existed. merged with existing.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126785395
wille (2023-01-06 15:29:07+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Fiz algumas correções em sua edição. Não é necessário incluir os edifícios que você mapear na relação do bairro.
Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126785518
eggie (2022-09-29 18:14:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Strubbl (2023-01-14 17:00:29+00:00): Hallo Hittin, mit dieser Änderung hast du ein Bild hinzugefügt, wobei der angegebene Pfad auf eine lokale Bilddatei auf deinem PC zeigt ("C:\users\user\desktop\VHS Haselünne.jpg").
Hast du die Datei noch und könntest sie ins Internet laden und verlinken? Z.B. zu Wikimedia Commons.

Viele Grüße
Sven
SHARCRASH (2022-09-29 15:41:04+00:00): + tracktype added
wuff57 (2024-07-18 11:51:08+00:00): Hallo cmk23, Du hast vor einiger Zeit die Zufahrtsstraßen zu den Berghöfen von highway=service zu highway=track, häufig auch ohne tracktype, umgemappt. Das sind doch frei befahrbare Straßen (keine Beschränkung auf landwirtschaftl. Verkehr) und als Zufahrtsstraßen würde doch hier highway=servide perfekt passen, oder nicht? Viele Grüße, wuff57
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-09-30 21:21:45+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
seattlefyi (2022-09-30 17:12:10+00:00): I'd updated this business last week, it looks like the Organic Maps app undid some of it since its data was slightly behind. I've reapplied some of the changes, but might want to double check!
sctrojan79 (2022-10-02 21:47:04+00:00): Hey, good catch and thanks for fixing.  There really should be some kind of data conflict warning in Organic Maps for this type of situation.

Cheers!
joost schouppe (2023-09-04 19:25:35+00:00): Hi Stef,
Did you survey tracks like this one? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098856872
I was there recently and could not find it. Pictures should be on mapillary soon.
Luzandro (2023-01-12 16:27:58+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe die Adressen aktualisiert und die alten Straßennamen mit Vorname, wie hier "Franz-Kobold-Gasse" als old_name wiederhergestellt

könntest du dir diesen Hinweis bitte ansehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2780041

ich bin seitdem leider nicht mehr dort vorbei gekommen, aber so wie ich das sehe, dürfte nördlich des Anzbach wohl alles Franzosenweg statt Sportplatzpromenade heißen und auch die inkonsistenten Wegklassen ab der Brücke mit highway=track / residential sind vermutlich beide falsch und es passt eher service?
aTarom (2022-09-29 17:03:16+00:00): Hola francas1
la etiqueta
"naptan:CommonName"
del elemento
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4101921249/history
es un error?

Parece que solo es aplicable para la base de datos NaPTAN de UK en paradas de transporte público?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:naptan:CommonName?uselang=en

Saludos y bienvenido a OSM


https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
https://t.me/OSMes
https://t.me/osmgalicia
francas1 (2022-09-29 17:58:24+00:00): Efectivamente, muchas gracias
Acabo de corregirlo para establecer alt_name
Fra00 (2022-10-02 16:13:58+00:00): Be careful, you deleted the correct tag "building", which must be used anyways.
J-MUC (2022-09-29 16:46:12+00:00): CS comment should have been: Edit Restaurant.
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-01 13:50:52+00:00): 9-29...= -20!  I solved it!

I'm assuming this is the date.  Regardless, please use better changeset comments.  What did you change, and why?
highflyer74 (2022-09-29 19:09:55+00:00): Hallo nochmal!

Könntest du bitte einmal erklären, was deine "Minor changes" beinhalten? Es ist wichtig, dass du aussagekräftige Änderungssatzkommentare verfasst, damit deine Mitmapper nachvollziehen können, was deine Intention war.

Lies dir dazu bitte folgenden Artikel durch:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Danke!
Apocolocyntōsis (2022-09-29 19:37:58+00:00): Hallo Highflyer,
Vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Zukünftig werde ich den Inhalt meiner Änderungen genauer spezifizieren.
highflyer74 (2022-09-29 19:05:35+00:00): Hallo!

Kannst du mir sagen, warum das Gebäude an der Elbchausee jetzt schief ist und mit einem layer=1 versehen wurde?

Viele Grüße!
Apocolocyntōsis (2022-09-29 19:35:06+00:00): Hallo Highflyer,
Vor meiner Änderung kreuzten sich Himmelsleiter und das Gebäude 187b. Ich habe das Gebäude verschoben. Dass das Gebäude mit einem layer=1 versehen wurde, ist ein Fehler. Ich habe diesen inzwischen rückgängig gemacht. Vielen Dank fürs aufmerksam machen!
highflyer74 (2022-09-30 06:14:57+00:00): Moin und danke für deine Antwort!

Das Verschieben von Gebäuden oder anderen Objekten solltest du nicht ohne Abgleich mit verschiedenen Luftbildquellen oder anderen in Hamburg verfügbaren Datenquellen machen. Luftbilder haben meist einen Versatz und / oder perspektivische Verfälschungen. Hier stellt sich nämlich jetzt die Frage: hat das Haus einen Knick? Laut Hamburg DK5 (HH LGV DK5 2021) ist dies nicht der Fall.

Warst du vor Ort?
Apocolocyntōsis (2022-09-30 07:32:53+00:00): Moin,
Das Haus hat tatsächlich keinen Knick, das habe ich kürzlich bei einer Begehung festgestellt. Wenn ich es ohne Knick kartiere, kreuzt es jedoch wieder den Weg (was in der Realität nicht der Fall ist, und ja auch das ursprüngliche Problem darstellt, das ich beheben wollte). Ich habe jetzt einen Kompromiss gefunden, indem ich das Haus wieder rechteckig, wenn auch leicht verschoben kartiert habe.
Dimitar155 (2022-09-30 07:26:05+00:00): Hello taxxxi,

What exactly was vandalized here? I see nothing wrong with the place names. The same question applies to the rest such changesets that you've made in the region.

Best regards,
Dimitar
Mavpa_z_mapoiu (2022-09-30 08:27:28+00:00): There was added random city point by uzer who made a lot of other damage and was blocked for 10 years.
Dimitar155 (2022-09-30 08:47:09+00:00): Assuming you that you are talking about user "Pirnul + Kurnul" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Pirnul + Kurnul), his edits in Bulgaria are fine, I've reviewed them. He only updated the population of the cities.
Dimitar155 (2022-09-30 08:48:27+00:00): First line of my last comment should've been:
Assuming that you are talking about
silversurfer83 (2022-09-30 19:19:55+00:00): Hi
Kleiner Tip fürs Mappen von rechtwinkligen DIngen: Wenn Du das Objekt fertig gezeichnet hast, noch einmal das ganze Objekt anwählen (klick) und dann die Taste "Q" drücken (oder rechtsklick --> rechtwinklig machen). Sieht dann einfach hübscher aus :)

Weiter viel Spaß
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126791147
ualios (2022-10-01 16:40:09+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto. Hai però cancellato il tag highway, immagino inavvertitamente, facendo scomparire la strada.
Per convenzione il nome della strada andrebbe scritto "Via Venti Settembre", magari aggiungendo il tag "alt_name=Via XX Settembre".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade
ivanbranco (2022-10-01 22:24:58+00:00): Aggiungo: perché hai riutilizzato il nodo di Benetton invece di crearne uno nuovo? Benetton è stato chiuso? Sul loro sito appare ancora se lo si cerca nello store locator.
ualios (2022-10-13 16:45:15+00:00): Ok corretto. Creato un nuovo nodo con i tag del poi inserito da jpart. Ritaggato il vecchio nodo Benetton mantenendo cronologia e vecchie coordinate.
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:50:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key.
* Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126791279
Florawi (2022-10-01 09:57:14+00:00): Hi Frans,
I am a bit surprised about your comments.
Most tasks I worked on yesterday already contained a lot of buildings, added by previous contributors. Some of those buildings may have been incorrect.
Building added by me I made rectanguar or circular with the Q key. And I was keen avoiding yards into buildings. But of course it's possible that there were some mistake in my mapping. 
Kind regards from Florawi.