piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Enock4seth (2021-10-16 20:46:18+00:00): Please remember to press "Q" after tracing a building to orthogonalize them, see this guide https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/
Ser9ei (2021-10-17 08:20:32+00:00): теги amenity допустимо переносить на контур, если школа занимает всё здание, но зачем было просто удалять name? Надо было его тоже перенести. Иначе вы просто удаляете информацию из базы.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112591241
Ser9ei (2021-10-17 08:17:26+00:00): Вы нарушили связность типов. Смотреть надо не на глазок, а куда это дорога ведёт. Нажмите пару раз уменьшение масштаба на карте и нажмите Ctrl+F5 после внесённой правки, посмотрите на большую картину и подумайте, всё ли правильно вы сделали...
Ser9ei (2021-10-17 08:12:34+00:00): Пожалуйста, перед редактированием карты читайте вики: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
Ну какой тут highway=tertiary?

Присоединяйтесь к сообщесту в телеграм и задавайте любые вопросы: @ruosm
Чем раньше это сделаете, тем меньше потом исправлять.
fndoder (2021-12-18 15:12:23+00:00): Добавление POI по списку адресов (используя геокодер) - плохая крайне идея. POI оказываются не в том месте, где фактически находятся. И потом другие пользователи создают ещё POI в фактическом месте.

Именно это случилось с точкой https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9170595974/history

Она оказалась по центру здания, хотя фактически магазин открылся с торца, на месте, где прежде был офис Сбербанка. И получился дубликат.

Кстати. В этом здании больше нет "Моей цены". Магазин закрылся. Открылся на его месте обычный магазин Магнит.
Allison P (2021-12-07 02:41:33+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993331238 really called "null"?

Vai https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993331238 tiešām sauc par "null"?
LVM_import (2021-12-07 15:05:44+00:00): Thanks, I will fix
Andrea Musuruane (2021-10-17 08:32:14+00:00): Ciao. Contrariamente a quello che comunemente si crede, disegnare gli edifici non è affatto semplice. Innanzitutto bisogna seguire la forma del tetto e poi riportare quanto fatto sulla base, come spiegato qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Roof_modelling L'edificio https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993331124 non è corretto perché presenta una corte interna. Per disegnare questa tipologia di edifici bisogna usare una relazione di tipo multi-poligono: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Relation:multipolygon Inoltre gli edifici moderni, come il https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993331132, hanno angoli rettangoli. Pertanto dovresti usare l’apposito strumento per ortogonalizzare gli angoli in iD: https://learnosm.org/it/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/ Infine, perché hai cancellato i numeri civici che erano presenti? Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112592033
SomeoneElse (2021-10-16 20:37:12+00:00): Although it's not signed, there's only really one way to get across the road between the two previously separate sections (well 2, if you count the traffic lights north or south of the junction), so I've filled in that gap too.
em1nk (2021-10-17 18:17:35+00:00): Metrobüs hat numaraları kaldırılmıştı. Araçların üzerinde de, MOBİETT uygulamasında da kod yok.
bora can (2021-10-18 01:57:12+00:00): @em1nk İETT'nin internet sitesinde gördüğüm için yazmıştım. Metrobüslerde hat numaralarının kaldırıldığını biliyorum zaten.
PT-53 (2022-09-01 05:31:08+00:00): Hallo Helmut,
diese Linie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993335832/history
hat (noch?) keine Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
seichter (2022-09-01 08:27:02+00:00): erledigt
Ser9ei (2021-10-17 08:04:43+00:00): Phone numbers have inappropriate format https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112592935
Alexey Vazhnov (2021-10-16 21:41:37+00:00): Could you please describe, what was made in this edit?
janolezab (2021-10-16 23:53:30+00:00): And please keep future changeset's bounding boxes to a minimum.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112593199
Lee Carré (2021-10-17 14:54:42+00:00): ▪︎http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
▪︎what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Carnildo (2021-10-20 19:00:02+00:00): Is there a reason why you added pedestrian crossings in the middle of nowhere in Canada and the United States?
Twardziel58 (2022-11-07 17:49:01+00:00): Dziękuję - poprawki wprowadzone
Twardziel58 (2022-11-07 17:50:10+00:00): Dziękuję - poprawki wprowadzone
McPomHH (2021-12-01 17:19:55+00:00): Wie kommst du zu der Erkennnist, dass die S31 von der DB Regio und nicht der S-Bahn Hamburg GmbH betrieben wird?
Ser9ei (2021-10-17 08:02:39+00:00): Лесополоса вокруг парковки частично осталась. Также удалён полигон, который вообще на залезает на парковку. Старайтесь не уничтожать объекты, если на самом деле они не полностью исчезли в реальности. Можно было потратить чуть-чуть больше время и просто скорректировать и разрезать полигон леса, сохранив куски, которые до сих пор существуют.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112593707
Ser9ei (2021-10-17 09:37:39+00:00): "int_ref" stands for "international reference"  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:int_ref
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112593914
532910 (2021-10-17 19:08:25+00:00): Indeed. But this is no a `ref`. Do you know a suitable key for this?
Ser9ei (2021-10-17 21:27:40+00:00): ref вполне подходит: "Сокращение от "reference", "reference code". Применяется для хранения самых различных условных кодов, условных обозначений, порядковых индексов, НОМЕРОВ КАКОЙ_ЛИБО ВНУТРЕННЕЙ НУМЕРАЦИИ (не входящих в адреса)."

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:ref
532910 (2021-10-17 22:08:28+00:00): Да, и все эти номера (касс, дорог, подъездов, входов, гаражных боксов, парковочных мест) они не просто так, а реано написаны на объекте и реально нужны пользователю. И все карты стараются их отобразить, как как это важная информация. Но никому не интересно, какой номер имеет бензоколонка или парк по какому-то там их собственному внутреннему индексу). Для различных каталогов нужно использовать ref:<something>=
Ser9ei (2021-10-17 23:15:43+00:00): Может, и не нужно никому, но не мешает.  ref:<something>= выносите на обсуждение. Никто ж не запрещает.
pitfire (2021-10-17 06:07:22+00:00): Bitte nicht an jede Hauszufahrt 
oneway=no: Dieser Werte sollte nur benutzt werden, wenn ausdrücklich, um Verwechslungen zu vermeiden, signalisiert werden soll, daß es sich bei dem Weg um keine Einbahnstraße handelt.
DUGA (2021-11-01 16:19:22+00:00): How does waterway have weight limit?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/936818180/history#map=19/39.39005/-76.55548
TAYbalt (2021-11-02 15:03:03+00:00): A waterway can have a weight limit when it is a culvert. A culvert is different from a bridge, it is a tunnel under a road. The weight limit, is the limit on the tunnel. A bridge is a free standing structure above the waterway. These changes were made based upon an authoritative dataset from Baltimore County, based on engineering definitions for bridges and culverts.  Please see the map roulette link for further information.
ElliottPlack (2021-11-10 16:30:38+00:00): The instructions in the map roulette are to change the road to a bridge if the existing waterway is a culvert. Phil probably added it as a culvert but the state/county do consider it a bridge. Truck routers would look at weight restrictions on the roadway but probably not on a waterway.
NieWnen (2021-10-17 12:00:49+00:00): Zmieniłeś w parkingu przy biedronce fee z no na yes
Podejrzewam, że raczej jest jakiś czas darmowy?
Jeśli tak, to wtedy można się pobawić w fee:conditional

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fee
SomeoneElse (2021-10-17 12:14:07+00:00): This was literally just the view from the ramp near Asda after trying to et something from Poundland and finding it shut.  More checking needs doing, for example to see exactly which unit of the vacant ones JD Sports is in, and to add "old_name" where it's still visible, such as on Mothercare.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-17 00:55:03+00:00): Also includes Easingwold from survey 6/9/2021
kartonage (2021-10-17 09:31:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full in cs 112603837 and 112603834 due to it being vandalism.
kartonage (2021-10-17 09:31:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full in cs 112603837 and 112603834 due to it being vandalism.
kartonage (2021-10-17 09:31:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full in cs 112603837 and 112603834 due to it being vandalism.
Carnildo (2021-10-22 04:42:52+00:00): Four errors:

1) A patio roof mapped as a separate building.
2) Two buildings mapped as one.
3) A building outline showing a courtyard that doesn't exist.
4) A temporary tent mapped as a permanent building.

*Sigh*
kartonage (2021-10-17 09:31:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in full in cs 112603837 and 112603834 due to it being vandalism.
NKA (2021-10-25 12:15:54+00:00): Vær snill å ikke redigere name/brand/branch slik som iD foreslår. Vi skriver name=* for btikker i Norge med avdelingsnavn, f.eks. "Coop Mega Harbitz torg".

Det har heller ikke så mye for seg å endre busstopp, om de ikke ligger helt feil. De blir synkronisert med Enter og er allerede riktig tagget.
Jožo Schwarz (2023-07-04 20:45:37+00:00): Ahoj, v rámci tohto changesetu si spravil viaceré zmeny, ktoré znemožnili routovanie po značených cykloturistických trasách 2423 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1116894) a 8425 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1689401). Konkrétne:
- uzol https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1376986396 - závora má zmenu z bicycle=yes na vehicle=private (samotná cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66338849 má pritom bicycle=yes)
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123491461, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71551945, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71551908, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66339048 na cestách, po ktorých vedie cyklotrasa je zmena z motor_vehicle=permit na vehicle=private
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/226402372, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71551867 po týchto lesných cestách síce nevedie cyklotrasa, ale podľa Stravy sa na bicyklovanie používajú.

Vieš prosím uviesť, na základe čoho si spravil uvedené zmeny? Je na týchto komunikáciách explicitná zákazová značka pre cyklistov? Alebo len klasický slovenský prípad, že je tam značka zákaz vjazdu všetkých vozidlám namiesto zákazu vjazdu všetkým motorovým vozidlám? Je pravdou, že OSM má odrážať realitu, ale v prípade, že stav v teréne a následné presné zmapovanie znefunkčňujú navigovanie po vyznačených cyklotrasách, je otázne, či mapa zachytáva realitu :) Treba nájsť kompromis, možno radšej problémové atribúty vymazať.
Mimochodom, cyklista môže použiť legálne všetky lesné cesty v oblasti. Na spomenuté cesty vyššie sa tak môže narozdiel od motorových vozidiel dostať vo viacerých bodoch z rôznych lesných ciest. Stav v mape by teda hovoril, že na každej z takýchto križovatiek (napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9352645453) je zákaz vjazdu cyklistom na danú asfaltovú komunikáciu, čo zrejme nie je.

Ďakujem za odpoveď
aceman444 (2023-07-10 12:21:45+00:00): Zdravim. Na tej ceste so zavorou som osobne bol a zmeny som urobil podla dopravnej znacky tam. Zial fotku uz nemam, ale bola "zakaz vjazdu vsetkym vozidlam okrem majitelov pozemkov". Samozrejme v OSM rozlisujem zakaz motorovym vozidlam a vsetkym vozidlam.
Samozrejme ak su tam nejake zakonne pravidla umoznujuce bicykle, tak o tych nemam vedomost (podla coho tvrdite, ze sa tam moze vsade bicyklovat?).
Ano na lesnej ceste s vyznacenou cyklotrasou tusim mozu zo zakona, otazka je co je to lesna cesta a co ked je na ceste znacka zakaz vjazdu vsetkym vozidlam. Myslim, ze sa to nedoriesilo ani na slovenskom fore. Inak ak na ceste nie je vyslovene bicycle=yes este to neznamena, ze sa tam neda ist s bicyklom. Lerbo cyklista sa lahko zmeni na chodcu na potrebnych usekoch.
Pekne to maju popisane na nemeckej verzii wiki pre kluc 'bicycle' (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle).
Chapem, ze jednoduche navigacie mozu nenavigovat cez objekty s vehicle=no, ale mozno by sa tento problem mal doladit prave v navigaciach (ak je tam pristup pre pesich, mozu pustit aj bicykel). A cez tu branu pristup je. Ale stale je otvorena otazka, ci tam cyklisti smu ked je to sukromna cesta (resp. "zakaz vjazdu vsetkym vozidlam okrem majitelov pozemkov"). Ze ci ma prioritu cyklotrasa alebo zakazova znacka.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71551867 no pokial viem na lesnych cestach (zase, co to je?) kde nie je znacena cyklotrasa sa bicyklovat nesmie, takze cokolvek hovori Strava asi nie je velmi relevantne (alebo je zmena zakona ci novy vyklad?).
aceman444 (2023-07-11 10:36:46+00:00): Dakujem, tak to uz zacina mat koncepciu. Ak teda mame mapu lesnych ciest (ale pozor, v OSM mame viac highway=track, ako je na tej mape z NLC) a na lesnej ceste je mozne bicyklovat (bol som v tom, ze len ak je znacena pre bicykle (cyklotrasa), tak potom by bolo mozne po tych cestach bicyklovat. Problemom je teda ta dopravna znacka, ktoru som videl a podla nej pridal vehicle=private.

Na bode
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1376986396 je znacka len zospodu.

Avsak chapal som to tak, ze k nej znacka zvrchu je https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/803998996 (ktoru som pridal zavoru) a teda usek medzi nimi je private. Samozrejme neviem aky je stav na inych cestach, ktore sa na tuto pripajaju odboku. Mozno tam su zavory a mozno nie.

Inak na cestach ako 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66338849/ uz znovu bicycle=yes je, cim by mohol byt problem vyrieseny aj bez odoberania vehicle=private (ale nie som proti odobraniu).

Ale minimalne na tych zavorach by som vehicle=private nechal, ked tam taka znacka je (minimalne tu juznu mozem znovu overit osobne). A navigacia by tam mala cyklistu pustit, ked je tam foot=yes, hoci by aj na par metroch musel zosadnut z bicykla.

Problem bude dalej robit znacka motor_vehicle=permit, ktoru pridava chlapik v 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66338849 , co je zatial nechvalena hodnota ale podla sucasneho vyznamu (povolenie dostane prakticky kazdy), to asi nie je pripad tychto ciest. Cize zase naopak mozno sem navigacie pustia lubovolne motorove vozidla. Skuste to s nim prebrat.
mueschel (2021-10-18 10:32:54+00:00): Hi,
on these two schools I found several tags that are not used in other places or are misspelled. Could you check and fix that?
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please have a look to the OSM Wiki to find out which tags are in use.
iandees (2021-10-17 02:17:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for making these changes. Two things to consider: be careful when you're dragging the map around so that you don't accidentally drag data around inadvertently. If you notice this happening, you can undo it with Ctrl+Z on your keyboard. Also, consider saving more often so that the area of your changes is smaller. This makes it easier to review. Thanks again!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112596671
MoiraPrime (2021-11-20 17:03:18+00:00): Why did you change the refs on MS 537?
mueschel (2021-10-19 10:02:52+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag 'diet:non_halal' here - this is not used in other places. Did you want to tag that there is no halal food? That would be "diet:halal = no".
Frans S (2021-10-17 10:27:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A and E on following document.
(this comment also applies to your other changesets pn this project)

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112597208
JackNUMBER (2023-03-22 23:50:27+00:00): Salut, j'ai l'impression que les nœuds 9177441989 et 9177441988 de ce changeset sont mal placés.
Mashin (2023-03-23 19:14:34+00:00): Thanks for catching those. I have no idea how could that have happened.
tonyf1 (2021-10-22 11:01:27+00:00): Hi, you seem to have a number of unresolved warnings, it would be better to fix them before moving on.
tonyf1 (2021-10-17 05:50:04+00:00): I think I meant 111080285
TheSwavu (2021-11-19 10:22:17+00:00): Hi

Is this turn restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13334397 supposed to be no right turn *from* Nepean Highway? Rather than to.
Diacritic (2021-11-20 09:01:19+00:00): Yes, thanks. :) 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114019540

Fixed.
bxl-forever (2021-10-18 15:41:01+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for this first edit.  It looks overall fine.

If you want to edit the map in Brussels, perhaps you might be interested to know we have more detailed aerial imagery: in the online editor you can use the Background icon on the right side and select "CIRB/CIBG most recent aerial imagery".
ALu68 (2021-10-18 07:30:59+00:00): Hello Kiran Ghatnatti,

Welcome to OSM.

The covered area of the substations is not a building.
The "building" tags you used in addition are not correct, e.g.
    110kv_ankalagi	
    110kv_ghataprabha_substation	
    110kv_mache_substation	
    110kv_suvarnasoudha	
    110kv_vadagavi_substation	
    11kv_nehrunagar_substation
see buildings tags: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings

Before proceeding with the mapping, please read the wiki first!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

See common tags for substation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dsubstation

Regards. Andre
abakus_uploader (2021-10-17 22:30:59+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Lee Carré (2021-10-17 14:55:28+00:00): Smaller changeset bounding boxes, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
iWowik (2021-12-06 05:09:45+00:00): Focus your efforts on communicating with the developers of monitoring tools, please.
This would benefit all mappers.
Lee Carré (2021-10-17 14:55:58+00:00): Smaller changeset bounding boxes, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
iWowik (2021-12-06 05:05:49+00:00): You have been answered by trigpoint in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112510841
nevw (2021-10-17 08:59:35+00:00): Hi
You have added you business node to the middle of a road intersection, possibly interfering with road navigation. Can you draw the outline of the building you operate from and put your business node over the part you operate from.
nevw (2021-10-18 09:37:09+00:00): no response, shifted to probable location, deleted malformed tags, reformatted others.
Glassman (2021-10-20 16:36:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112600431
4004 (2021-10-17 22:37:46+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
одинаковый адрес? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993389725 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993389723
vakal (2021-10-17 08:35:44+00:00): add graves, grass and ways
Glassman (2021-10-20 16:36:24+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112602033
skyper (2021-10-19 10:56:16+00:00): Hallo Hoff1980
iD hat massive Probleme mit Relationen. So wurden hier z.B. alle Route-Relationen nach Osten beschädigt. ToniE hat es bereits korrigiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112646655

Bitte sei vorsichtig mit Relationen und kontrolliere die Reihenfolge der Mitglieder oder verwende gleich eine bessere Editor-Software. Danke

Viele Grüße,
skyper
denshal (2021-10-23 18:20:12+00:00): Зачем так исправили Кутузова ?
DaveF (2021-10-19 00:29:48+00:00): Hi
landuse=grass is not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct.

I've flagged it as an error:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748#issuecomment-940155347
francians (2021-10-17 14:27:26+00:00): Dear Tom,

I'm curious about the changes you are doing to this building for the 3D rendering. How do you check the results? Do you follow a guide?

Thanks
Cheers
Francesco
tom_yorados (2021-10-21 20:04:28+00:00): Hi Francesco,

with 
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=44.6850335&lon=7.2737307&zoom=18
no real guide just infos from the osm wiki. Stuff like
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape
But the roof parts still dont want to do like i want :-).
At the end, it should like like here:
https://paesana.it/ita/gallery.asp

Cheers
Carsten
Tilia_J (2021-10-17 16:27:48+00:00): Hoi.

Volgende geldt voor alle changesets met bomkraters: 

Beschrijvende namen (name) als bomkraters zijn niet conform de guidelines.

Dit hoort hoort in de description thuis. Die had je al aangemaakt, dus name kan verwijderd worden.
eggie (2021-10-17 10:51:21+00:00): Dag mdavids.. Je vraagt feedback ..
Je vraagt feedback..  Lijkt me oke zo. Op de luchtfoto zie ik nog een bomkrater er vlak naast.
Hier kun je zien welke tags je evt nog kunt toevoegen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dbomb_crater
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-17 16:45:43+00:00): Moet inscription=Bomkrater uit WW2 niet description= zijn?
user_11435438 (2021-10-19 01:41:36+00:00): 好家伙，我直接好家伙
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112605707
Kovoschiz (2021-10-18 05:55:56+00:00): `=pedestrian` means a pedestrianized vehicular street, not any road for pedestrian. You are looking for `=footway`, plus `footway=sidewalk`.
Eucalyptus (2021-10-21 02:49:49+00:00): thanks for the clarification and correction.
Ser9ei (2021-10-17 23:07:41+00:00): Если нет знаков "60", то ставится RU:Urban
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112606012
Ser9ei (2021-10-17 23:06:17+00:00): Не пишем в name что попало: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F

Это тег ИСКЛЮЧИТЕЛЬНО для наименований.

Чтобы избежать ошибок в будущем, присоединяйтесь к сообществу в телеграм: @ruosm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112606123