piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
malenki (2015-06-15 20:01:47+00:00): "hamlet" war das Node schon immer – vielleicht wird es jetzt ja etwas weniger prominent gerendert. Es fällt jedenfalls weniger auf als in village.
Die ausführliche Beschreibung war zuvor nicht vorhanden – das sieht man, wenn man auf den "Chronik"-Link klickt. Die bekam ich vom ortskundigen ursprünglichen Ersteller.
Natürlich finde ich die fehlende Erwähnung von "Kaffeehäuser" im Netz "interessant", aber wir sammeln ja Geodaten. :)
malenki (2015-06-15 20:16:34+00:00): PS: Man könnte statt name ja loc_name nehmen, da es kein "offizieller" Name zu sein scheint
indigomc (2016-08-05 14:39:10+00:00): It seems that in this changeset all the WHC information and the names in differing languages of the Taj Mahal were removed. (Sometime afterward another user removed this apparantly near empty way but did not replace the names, which he would only have noted by looking up the history. )
Jean-Marc Liotier (2020-08-19 18:40:11+00:00): Ekomtolo (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3037843882) is a duplicate of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2467813971 and is is wrong - I just surveyed it.
keithonearth (2024-07-23 06:14:12+00:00): Hi James, I've seen a number of sections of sea on the coast of Haida Gwaii, tagged as `natural=water` and `intermittent=yes`, below the `natural=coastline`,  like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299759857/

This is a strange tagging convention, and I'm not sure how to interpret it. Areas of sea that are exposed at low tide? Reefs? Something else? Do you know what the features were intended to represent in the Canvec data? How could we better tag them? As the features are currently tagged they do not mean anything, and are messy.
james_hiebert (2024-07-23 14:18:38+00:00): I did this nearly 10 years ago, so I can't necessarily recall everything that went into it. But IIRC, all of the features in the changeset are straight out of the CanVec data. The way that you mention sure does look like a low tide area.
keithonearth (2024-08-20 22:26:37+00:00): OK, sounds like it doesn't mean anything here on OSM, so I'll see what I can do in terms of deleting the relations and ways. 

I'm not very experienced with imports, but the one I did I documented what tags I used in the imported dataset and how I translated them into OSM tags on my import userpage (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/keithonearth_imports). While the one import I did is far less complex than yours, and I could have done a better job of phrasing it, I think it's a good thing to do. I'm not sure about the rules about imports, but I recommend the approach.

I was going to say it's only been a couple of years since the only import I've done, and I've already forgotten the details. But it turns out that it's been 7 years. I couldn't remember how I translated the CoV data tags a few months later, or which ones I used and which ones I discarded, but I don't have to because I wrote it down.
keithonearth (2024-09-11 03:28:05+00:00): I've been working on it, deleting some areas, and retagging some as `natural=wetland`, `wetland=tidalflat` when the satellite imagery makes that look likely.
crystalwalrein (2016-06-20 21:30:35+00:00): Why were these roads changed to primary? And why was Harry Wright Boulevard marked as cobblestone?
jeka p (2016-10-12 16:00:26+00:00): Hi! The sign in the Gablerstrasse is this one: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motor_vehicle
I've corrected it.

BR,
Jeka
eggie (2022-10-04 15:45:55+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen...  bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_6110846 (2017-08-27 11:33:46+00:00): Я откатил эту правку поскольку разгребать масовые ошибки в украинском переводе а вернее насмешке над украинском переводе нет желания.
sheldonelectric (2025-04-19 07:35:34+00:00): hey there, I wanted to ask if you think it's ok that I put the lighthouse onto its building https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/165140804
PT-53 (2019-11-25 11:21:08+00:00): Hallo Ulrich,
Du hast an dieser Brücke
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75781167/history
das Merkmal construction=yes ergänzt.
Statt highway=path + construction=yes sollte für eine längerfristige Weg-Sperrung wegen einer Baustelle die Merkmalkombination highway=construction + construction=path verwendet werden.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction
Besteht die Baustelle noch oder ist der Weg schon wieder freigegeben worden?
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-08 10:53:43+00:00): erledigt
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-01-04 00:33:02+00:00): Proszę stosować korekcję prostopadłości przy rysowaniu obrysów. Przykładowo, ten budynek powinien mieć kąty proste a nie ma: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299868323
W edytorze JOSM służy do tego skrót kl. Q
Pozdrawiam
jeka p (2017-02-25 10:08:54+00:00): Згідно Вікіпедії це річка Домажир:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299925336#map=13/49.8598/23.7957

Чому вона була позначена як Зимна Вода / вишенька?
skyper (2015-03-30 23:45:16+00:00): Was für Quellen hast Du denn für die Hausnummern verwendet ?

Wildtalstraße Hausnummer 24 ist jetzt doppelt eingetragen.
aharvey (2018-04-21 23:01:53+00:00): you've added this picnic site over a residential area, could you move it to the right location based on the LPI Imagery which should be clearer here?
tuxayo (2018-02-08 07:39:33+00:00): Hi, what was your source for this changeset?

For this node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3040166436
should we remove it as it's not fixed?
species (2018-02-08 07:43:27+00:00): I was on a photomapping tour three years ago.
Probably some shops have changed anyway - feel free to remove/rename the node in question.
tuxayo (2018-05-23 20:14:32+00:00): Okay, It's not clear now.
Thanks for your answer.

note added: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1403321
Autopat (2024-11-18 00:04:13+00:00): Garage AutoPat
j-wills (2015-12-28 17:08:55+00:00): в чем смысл amenity=parking на точке?
FreedSky (2016-06-16 07:35:15+00:00): 不要脸
keithonearth (2024-07-01 19:32:17+00:00): This import seems to include coastal regions of sea tagged as both `natural=water` and intermittent=yes`, I've just found this as relations, but there may be some mapped as a single circular way. (example relation: 

Some of them seem to be areas of shallow water, probably to the low tide line. Others include deeper water. To my knowledge OSM does not map low tide lines, nor does it make sense to me to map some areas of sea as `natural=water`, as opposed to `natural=bay`, or some other named feature.

I'm tempted to just delete the relations as I come across them. Do you have any input?
keithonearth (2024-07-01 20:33:12+00:00): oops, I forgot to link to the example relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3989104/
trial (2026-06-10 12:02:46+00:00): And water bodies like this one https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299967036 are "inside" the forest, it should be excluded from the forest.
canfe (2020-11-27 10:11:05+00:00): Ho tolto il passaggio bici nei portici perché vietato.
Le statue non sono monumento e i portici sono colonnade non tunnel.
JesseFTW (2023-01-30 01:06:31+00:00): I assume the wikipedia=en:Bing link was a weird mistake? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300020046/history
Jorge Juan (2015-03-10 12:54:13+00:00): La glorieta tiene una fuente rodeada de acera, la cual no es accesible desde ningún paso de peatones. No creo que "highway=pedestrian" (calle peatonal) sea la etiqueta adecuada. Yo eliminaría la vía completamente.
Por cierto, esto no está en Triana.
user_5359 (2016-07-02 05:50:20+00:00): Hello! I have revert your changeset because you add a address to street not to a building. Please try again to add the address to the right location.
kreuzschnabel (2016-10-24 11:37:17+00:00): Falls du noch aktiv bist: Mittelspannungsleitungen sind power=minor_line, die Masten power=pole.
Jiří Eischmann (2024-12-02 12:16:06+00:00): I came across the relation 3990718 yesterday and it looks strange. It leads from nowhere to nowhere, has no sign on site. If no one objects, I will delete it in one week.
Nakaner (2015-09-02 20:44:13+00:00): Bis du dir sicher, dass das das Blockkennzeichen Nr. 84 ist? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2355312950/history

Ich bin gestern dort entlang gefahren und habe durch den Führerstand des IC-Steuerwagens eine "80" gesehen. Es kann sein, dass ich mich verguckt habe, aber das Blockkennzeichen Nr. 84 steht bei ca. Strecken-km 91,25 im Tunnel Langes Feld.

In OSM habe ich noch nichts geändert. Bis 12.9. kann ich dort noch vorbeifahren, so lange gilt noch mein Deutschlandpass.
Markus K (2015-09-04 09:38:47+00:00): Hallo Nakaner,
ich glaube du hast recht, an der Stelle sollte das Blockkennzeichen 80 stehen. Ich werde heute abend aber sicherheithalber nochmal meine Fotos anschauen. 
84 solle aber nicht im Tunnel sein, das sollte kurz vor dem Beginn des ersten Trogs stehen.
Gruß Markus
user_3022894 (2018-10-27 18:23:34+00:00): Hi herrmann51,
ich habe unter anderem diesen von dir bearbeiteten Weg: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95017484 wieder auf highway=track zurückgesetzt. Der Weg für zu keiner Siedlung und zu keinem Haus mehr hin. Er wird auch nicht stark genutzt, ist für mich also keine "kleinere Durchgangsstraße" o. Ä. Im motorisierten Verkehr wird der Weg ausschließlich von den Traktoren der Bauern befahren. Habe da noch nie jemand anderes herfahren sehen. Auch westlich davon schließt sich highway=track an.
Viele Grüße Lukas
eggie (2018-04-28 06:39:29+00:00): 'k Zie dat je nooit een welkomstmail hebt ontvangen... bij deze..Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
pnorman (2017-02-26 03:18:58+00:00): Hello,

In OpenStreetMap you can't copy from copyrighted maps without permission. This includes vworld, which you did here. Continuing to copy like this could lead to a permanent block. Unfortunately I have to remove this copied data.

Paul Norman
For the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group


안녕하세요.

오픈스트리트맵(OpenStreetMap)에서는 저작권이 있는 지도를 여러분이 허락없이 복사하여 사용할 수는 없습니다. 이 해당 범위에는 여러분이 사용한 Vworld도 포함됩니다. 이와 같은 복사작업을 지속적으로 하게 된다면, 접속이 영구적으로 차단하게 될수도 있습니다. 안타깝지만, 저는 복사된 데이터는 삭제할 수 밖에 없다는 것을 알려 드립니다. 

오픈스트리트맵 데이터 워킹 그룹을 대신하여
폴 노먼 (Paul Norman) 드림
Endres Pelka (2015-03-14 20:21:48+00:00): Dodajesz kościół? I do tego usuwasz atrybuty Doliny Górnej Wisły?
Endres Pelka (2015-03-14 21:00:12+00:00): O tak, o tak! Relację mezoregionu zmień w relację drogi! Wszystko takie kompatybilne! Robię pełny rewert, bo nie wiadomo co jeszcze popsułaś/eś.
GerdP (2015-11-23 21:20:23+00:00): Hi there!
I'e noticed that this part of the coast is surrounded by natural=water polygons.
Is there a good reason for this?
The wiki says that natural=water is for lakes, not for oceans.
MrMoehritz (2020-01-17 15:49:47+00:00): Hallo Christina, du bist ja schon lange nicht mehr aktiv aber, vllt kannst du ja noch kurz schreiben warum du aus der Infotafel ein Bücherregal gemacht hast?
Riyadi IRM-RV (2020-02-27 04:31:39+00:00): hi mr saidin. can you give me information. is that possible secondary road dead-end? especially in this area. makasih
b108 (2015-02-01 14:52:26+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Что обозначает  тэг

ticket:plain = yes

у этого объекта?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3043296464

Может быть имелось в виду "plane" (самолёт) ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-12-15 17:48:40+00:00): What is the source of this toilet data? BTW, is it really a good idea to map private toilets in OSM?
dieterdreist (2018-01-22 11:08:13+00:00): questo changeset ha introdotto un sacco di "doppioni" di parcheggi, perché il lavoro buono di aggiungere i parcheggi come aree non ha tenuto conto del fatto che c'erano già parcheggi come nodi (punti). Dove mi sono accorto, ho già provveduto e cancellato il nodi.
EugenyN (2014-12-14 20:47:32+00:00): Здравствуйте! Не нужно подписывать назначение зданий в теге name. назначение должно быть понятным из тега building. то же с детскими площадками. достаточно leisure=playground

улицы - это всегда highway=residential независимо от покрытия.

Если будут вопросы, пишите.
PT-53 (2019-08-11 07:48:02+00:00): Hallo AletGPS,
in keep right wird für diese Fläche 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300252464/history
ein Hinweis schwimmende Inseln, Way 300252464 angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=67949068
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an:
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-19 15:52:34+00:00): Hallo AletGPS, 
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
SomeoneElse (2016-07-03 16:30:56+00:00): Hi Brian,
Is "Bethel Church" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300285453 a name or a denomination (or something else)?
Cheers,
Andy
brianboru (2016-07-04 07:41:57+00:00): Thanks Andy - corrected
trial (2017-03-14 22:43:11+00:00): bonjour, vous êtes sûr que le bbq est enterré ? ;-)
C'est ce que veut dire covered=yes, Cf. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:covered
shelter=yes ?
lann (2017-03-15 18:53:19+00:00): J'ai enlevé covered qui veut dire couvert
trial (2017-03-15 21:10:38+00:00): on est d'accord covered veut dire couvert mais dans le sens de couches OpenStreetMap, or ici le bbq est bien au niveau du sol, pas en souterrain.
C'est parce que j'avais moi-même fait la faute que j'ai signalé le problème.
trial (2017-03-27 19:48:44+00:00): oups, autant pour moi, je répare. Concernant les bbq, vous avez raison (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbbq) mais cette description est en contradiction avec la règle pour les abris bus (shelter=yes) et avec la règle générale de l'attribut covered https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:covered)
GerdP (2015-11-03 08:16:52+00:00): bitte prüfen:
highway=mini_roundabout ist für sehr spezielle nodes.
Ich vermute, es ist eine Wendeschleife,
da passt evtl. highway=turning_loop (auch für node).
Ich habe es erstmal auf residential zurückgeändert.
Siehe auch 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout
dort wird der Unterschied deutlich.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-15 09:42:33+00:00): What was the source of the change of (for example) "landuse=churchyard" to "landuse=religious" in http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242868714/history ?  Did you survey it and find that it was _not_ a churchyard?
Polarbear (2015-02-15 10:23:35+00:00): landuse=religious + religion=christian is internationally better understood than churchyard. 

We also use amenity=PoW and not amenity=church.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-15 10:52:39+00:00): So you didn't actually survey any of these?
Polarbear (2015-02-15 11:29:36+00:00): As documented in the source tag of the CS, they were surveyed on aerial imagery, the 14 landuse=religious among 121 residential features, mostly residential buildings. 

Aerial image survey is a well-accepted style of mapping.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-15 12:01:24+00:00): The changeset comment doesn't say anything about religious, only residential.

If someone's surveyed a place and thinks that it is best tagged as landuse=churchyard then it is NOT an "accepted style of mapping" for someone to change that based on aerial imagery, simply based on discussions on the tagging list.  We map what we see and what we know; the strength of Openstreetmap is its local mappers.
Polarbear (2015-02-17 18:39:47+00:00): Right, the CS comment should have then said 88.5% residential and 11.5% religious refinements. Which percentage of mappers leaves no comment at all?

On the issue, I was messaging local mappers based on your personal comment last summer, and all but one agreed and welcomed it as a fix; only one didn't and changed it back.
Pierce (2018-12-22 22:34:47+00:00): Is this pitch a bowling green? Or genuinely called "Bowling Green"?
Pierce (2018-12-22 22:59:25+00:00): Can you please describe what this workshop is?

My guess is that you're looking for the following tags.

amenity=social_facility
social_facility=workshop
social_facility:for=senior

Can you please also describe what you're trying to capture with Gym? You should not be putting the name of the place as they type of place.
Is this is genuinely for gymnastics? Or is this a gymnasium? Or is this just a fitness center?
Pierce (2018-12-22 22:23:27+00:00): Hi there, it's generally not particularly a good idea to include other meta data within the name of the location. If it's indeed still called Damascus College.
Nenad Micic (2016-07-08 15:18:38+00:00): I am interested to know if this 'fix me' path from punta Anna down actually exist and what is level on SAC scale. On some forums people say that this path is not real path ? 
Thanks in advance,
Petr Slavíček (2016-07-10 10:55:55+00:00): Hello, the way there. I went after her personally. It is clearly visible, but I did not have GPS.
Petr
PT-53 (2019-10-16 07:32:29+00:00): Hallo  Wychuchol,
Du hast an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300519707/history
das Merkmal disused=yes eingetragen. Das ist gem.
Lifecycle prefix - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
falsch. Stattdessen sollte disused:highway?path + disused:bicycle=no + disused: ....   verwendet werden.

OSMI-Hinweis "nonop_confusion_on_ways":
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=9.40727&lat=48.49846&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways,ways_without_tags

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Nakaner (2019-10-16 09:05:38+00:00): @PT-53 Schau dir mal https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=29368 bzw. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/search.php?action=show_user_posts&user_id=80291 an.
PT-53 (2019-10-16 09:33:17+00:00): Hallo Michael,
ich habe mal nur die ersten Beiträge überflogen, alles zu lesen habe ich keine Lust.
Ich nehme mal an, Du zweifelst das disused=yes an. Dann laß ich das wie es ist. Für eine eigene Vor-Ort-Kontrolle ist mir das zu weit weg.
Grüße
Felix Schütt (2017-02-01 12:42:07+00:00): Guten Tag,

ich wollte fragen, ob die Strassennamen in diesem Changeset wirkliche Namen oder eher ausgedachte "lokale" Namen sind.

MfG, Felix
gravedigger1981 (2017-02-02 21:21:03+00:00): Hallo Felix,
die Namen habe ich von z.T. aktuell nicht mehr vorhandenen Wegweisern entnommen.
Es sind keine offiziellen Straßennamen, da es auch keine Straßen, sondern nur Waldwege sind.
Grüße
Christoph
Constable (2019-05-08 12:30:55+00:00): Ciao, l'area picnic https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3046078308 ha davero quel nome?
Il tag name deve essere aggiunto solo quando un oggetto ha un nome proprio, es. Stadio Meazza, Rifugio Capanna Margherita,... se un oggetto non ha nome proprio è giusto che venga mappato senza nome invece, senò dovremmo usare name=casa per ogni casa del mondo, name=albero per ogni albero, name=sentiero per ogni sentiero,...
Grazie!
Irma IRM-ED (2022-12-19 22:57:06+00:00): Hello, Farras
 The geometry of this object (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/300534297) based on Maxar's image it is crossing with the natural:water.

Please, check and repair.
If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.
Thankyou
GerdP (2015-10-15 07:35:10+00:00): please review:
way 253360741 has 
highway=unclassified;tertiary
malajul (2018-02-06 01:56:49+00:00): Is the service road section of 236th St SW really not accessible from any direction? Are cars not allowed on that segment? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107115572) Thanks!
Natfoot (2018-02-06 03:42:18+00:00): This is an Emergency access only.  You could pass through illegally with a car.
malajul (2018-02-06 18:42:27+00:00): Thanks! I will add the access restriction
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:10:58+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/300603354
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:41:32+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83221424
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-04-21 07:35:22+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1752171 ?
Mike Baggaley (2016-01-06 18:21:23+00:00): Hi, "Service Road To Hever Close" does not sound like a valid road name to me, more a description. I can't make sense of your explanation of the rename from Hughenden Close. If the road is signposted Hughenden Close, then that is the name that should be used, whether or not there are any houses with that street name and regardless of whether houses with a Hever Close address also face Hughenden Close. I suggest setting the name to Hughenden Close with a description saying it is a service road for properties on Hever Close.

Regards,
Mike
Heverman (2016-01-06 18:58:24+00:00):  I am only interested in Facts. The road was renamed by the Council as I have reported and the roadside sign changed accordingly.  You can check with them. The reason, or your opinion on the name,  doesnt matter to those who are delivering to residences on this estate. I think the whole concept of open street maps is to keep them up to date, not to pick holes in the actual names.
Yorvik Prestigitator (2014-11-07 17:36:16+00:00): The "hole" at top of New Lane is coming up on keepright as an untagged way - is it meant to be an island in the residential landuse?
Yorvik Prestigitator (2014-11-07 17:36:46+00:00): way 300655231 for clarification
SomeoneElse (2014-12-09 18:04:26+00:00): Sorry I didn't reply to this - unfortunately people are only subscribed automatically to changesets from the time that changeset discussions were turned on, which was 2nd November I think.
freeExec (2015-02-16 07:49:13+00:00): Откуда информация по населению ?
Dodko (2023-02-07 09:01:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3048130039
Ak je tu pálenica zmeňte značku na
craft=distillery
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft=distillery
aceman444 (2023-02-12 22:13:39+00:00): Super, dakujem. V tej dobe zrejme taka znacka poriadne ani neexistovala :)
SomeoneElse (2015-10-22 08:31:16+00:00): For info, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24584589 where one of the adverse effects of this mechanical edit are being discussed
GerdP (2015-10-15 18:15:06+00:00): please review:
footway=ebankment 
is a very unusual tag. Was ist
meant to be embankment=yes ?
Shmias (2014-11-24 11:22:47+00:00): "Driving Range", "Pitchinggreen" und "Puttinggreen"? sind das wirklich die Namen dieser Flächen oder ist das nicht eher eine Beschreibung? 

wenn ja sollte vielleicht eher das description tag verwendet werden.
Shmias (2014-11-24 11:31:55+00:00): [name ist nur der Name](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name)
malenki (2014-11-24 16:42:20+00:00): golf=driving_range gibt es bereits im Wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Golf#Details_within_a_golf_course
Taginfo¹ kennt auch 
golf=putting_green sowie  
golf=pitching_green  

http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/golf#values
Shmias (2014-11-29 10:05:01+00:00): das wurde recht häufig so getaggt:

Driving Range:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Driving%20Range
Drivingrange: http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Drivingrange

Pitching green:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Pitching%20green
Pitchinggreen:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Pitchinggreen

Puttinggreen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Puttinggreen
Putting green: http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Putting%20green

ich werds mal ersetzen wo ich es sehe
Shmias (2014-11-29 10:08:24+00:00): die tags waren tatsächlich schon vorhanden. ich habe also nur das name-tag entfernen müssen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27107790
neuhausr (2015-03-19 22:00:09+00:00): I didn't follow the whole way, but at least parts of these lines don't appear to meet the standard on the wiki for "abandoned"--they're more like razed (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways#Life-cycle) Can you please review and retag as appropriate?
railfan-eric (2015-03-19 23:40:21+00:00): thanks for the suggestion.  i took care of it.most of the line was hard to really see so i did it all as razed.
plasmaron (2014-11-29 16:47:13+00:00): Ich habe hier den Namen entfernt, da ein privater Vorgraten nicht so gekennzeichnet werden sollte. Hier gibt es Infos wie man einen privaten Garten kennzeichnet: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Garden_specification
Ob hier überhaupt in Garten sein sollte, wird in diesem Kartenfehler besprochen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/278104