piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
santamariense (2019-08-13 14:44:03+00:00): Como a via de fato existe, não é correto deletar ela. No caso, por se tratar de uma via privada, existem tags apropriadas que permitem que os moradores trafeguem por ela e que restrinja o tráfego de passagem por ela.
Neste caso caberia marcar esta via como highway=service + service=alley + access=destination , de modo que só rotearia pelo local para dar acesso as casas que estão no local.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73253847
ricardopretto (2019-08-13 17:55:53+00:00): OK, obrigado pelo contato. Irei arrumar!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73253847
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:59:16+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-01 20:15:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73981417 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the UK.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73168327 for details.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-01 20:15:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73981417 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the UK.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73168327 for details.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:59:22+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:59:29+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-01 20:14:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73981417 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the UK.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73168327 for details.
mavl (2019-11-10 13:04:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2019-08-12 13:37:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

I have delete your entry.
Glassman (2019-08-12 22:10:11+00:00): OSM isn't the place to add personal information. I've reverted your edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73254351
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-09-01 20:15:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73981417 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the UK.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73168327 for details.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:59:36+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
Allison P (2024-02-11 18:30:24+00:00): You have added foot=use_sidepath to ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/659572145. But there are no sidewalks!

I think that access tags like foot=* are meant for signed restrictions anyway. Is it really not allowed to walk on these streets?
PerplexingPenguins (2024-02-11 23:59:09+00:00): I think I was under the impression that foot=use_sidepath was to be used for all sidewalks, but that does indeed seem not to be the case

especially for that road lol
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:59:41+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:59:47+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
DaveF (2019-08-15 19:21:14+00:00): Hi
You've added a way with no tags.
LisiMeier (2019-09-02 15:53:25+00:00): Hi
I will try to put some tags. if I have no succes you can do it for me? This is a path in the wood,he is earthy, a little bit stony, only for hikers,
DaveF (2019-09-02 16:19:55+00:00): You've previously added tags successfully. I believe you're more than capable of doing it yourself.
mavl (2019-08-12 16:04:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Очень плохо светофор возвращён на место. Неужели вы не заметили, что сдвинув точку, вы превратили здание из четырёх точек в здание из пяти точек, при этом две стороны этого здания больше 150 метров. Также это новое здание пересекает улицу и другое здание.  
  
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=73254907
mavl (2019-08-12 16:10:23+00:00): Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете правок, отменены.
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ralley (2019-08-12 07:34:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edit.  Just one thing to note, there was already an existing node with the address information for 12 Easton Way.  You could have merged that with the building outline instead of creating duplicate information for number 12.
ke9tv (2019-08-12 05:59:53+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:39:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:38:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295
ke9tv (2019-08-12 06:00:00+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
ke9tv (2019-08-12 06:00:17+00:00): Import user should be ke9tv, NOT keytv-NYSDEC-import
mapman44 (2019-08-12 19:36:46+00:00): Kaynin, welcome to OSM. Just a couple of things to keep in mind...state abbreviations are always two upper case letters, i.e. OR for Oregon. Buildings almost always should have square corners. The easy way to get that is by selecting the building and pressing the "q" key, or you can right click and select the square box in the menu. Please go back and fix the ones you created. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73255386
Warin61 (2019-08-20 04:51:22+00:00): Hi,

Would be good if you added the surface to the rest of the road .. surface=paved would do. This is viewable in Ersi Clarity.
PT-53 (2019-08-18 09:52:25+00:00): Hallo Cuzim,
Du hast diese Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319134739/history
zur Einbahnstraße gemacht.
Ist das schon korrekt?
Oneway=yes und lanes:forward=* + lanes:backward=* passen jedenfalls nicht zusammen.
Wie lande dauert die Baustelle und wo gibt es Infos dazu?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-08-25 12:41:28+00:00): Hallo Cuzim, 
es wäre schön, wenn Du noch antworten würdest.
Grüße
CuzImKaiser (2019-08-25 13:21:01+00:00): Hallo!
Entschuldigung für die späte Antwort, ich war im Urlaub!
Die Straße wird aufgrund einer Dauerbaustelle bzgl. einem neuem Einkaufscenter nur einseitig befahren. Diese ist bis September 2020 laut Beschilderung gesperrt. Allerdings ist für die Feuerwehr ein Ampel-Sytem installiert, welche es ihnen ermöglicht, schneller Richtung "Haltingen" zu gelangen.
Um meine Aussage zu bestätigen, stütze ich mich auf die Infos von der Website der Stadt Weil am Rhein. 
https://www.weil-am-rhein.de/pb/862394_865043_865211_865231_2098369_2264885_2264252_2264241.html
PT-53 (2020-09-20 07:23:59+00:00): Hallo Cuzim, 
ist die Einbahnstraßen-Regelung für die B3 noch aktuell und wie lange dauert es eventuell noch?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-11-22 08:38:40+00:00): Hallo CuzImKaiser,
es wäre schön, wenn Du noch antworten würdest.
Grüße
CuzImKaiser (2020-11-22 10:01:59+00:00): Hallo!
Die Einbahnstraße ist noch aktuell und ist weiterhin nur von Richtung Stadtauswärts befahrbar. Die neue Planung sieht eine Sperrung bis Juni 21 vor, allerdings gehe ich von aus, das dies noch länger anhalten wird. Die Befahrung gegen die Fahrtrichtung ist den Einsatzfahrzeugen der naheliegenden Feuerwehr durch eine Ampelschaltung ermöglicht.
PT-53 (2020-11-22 10:42:55+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.
PT-53 (2021-07-04 08:39:55+00:00): In VerkehrsInfo BW ist keine Info über eine halsbeseitige Sperrung der B 3 auffindbar > Sperrung per oneway=yes gelöscht
Supaplex (2020-01-02 13:58:01+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
eggie (2019-08-12 11:30:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
PT-53 (2019-08-12 07:54:48+00:00): Hallo Marsuna,
ist diese Behelfsausfahrt 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/677845278/history
noch aktuell / in Betrieb?
Fragende Grüße
Marsuna (2019-08-12 08:45:00+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

danke für die Rückmeldung. Mir selber ist sie beim Bearbeiten nicht aufgefallen, aber ich recherchiere mal, wie es sich real verhält. Der Logik nach würde ich sagen, dass sie nicht mehr aktiv ist.

Antwortende Grüße
Marsuna
PT-53 (2019-09-01 09:11:19+00:00): Hallo Marsuna, 
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an diesem Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/665074338/history
das Merkmal highway=construction in highway=tertiary geändert. 
Wenn Die Straße für den Verkehr freigegeben ist, müßte noch das Merkmal construction=tertiary gelöscht werden.

An diesem Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693889591/history
ist das Merkmal oneway=yes gesetzt, an  o.g. Straßenabschnitt aber nicht. Das paßt so nicht zusammen.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-09-10 08:17:08+00:00): Hallo Marsuna,
Du hast zwischenzeitlich an diesem Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693889591/history#map=18/47.77250/9.18776
das Merkmal oneway=yes gelöscht.
Jetzt gibt es da noch das Merkmal oneway:proposed=no. Gehört das nicht auch weg?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-09-23 12:22:14+00:00): erledigt
ralley (2019-08-12 06:57:32+00:00): Please do not create fake buildings and please use meaningful comments for you changes
ralley (2019-08-12 07:29:21+00:00): This changeset also placed kerbs accross street ways etc.  Reverted by changeset 73257261.
Arnaud Champollion (2020-06-14 06:52:36+00:00): Bonjour Troghoutsk,
Le chemin que tu as nommé "Disparu" n'existe plus du tout ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/712963013
Si c'est le cas je je supprime pour éviter d'induire en erreur le routage d'itinéraire.
Merci de ta confirmation,
Arnaud
Glassman (2019-08-12 14:35:16+00:00): Did you discuss these changes anywhere? I agree that some of the changes may be correct, but some seem questionable.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73256439
DENelson83 (2019-08-12 22:59:00+00:00): This is the methodology used for such points in British Columbia.  They are tagged with "natural=cape" and not "place=locality".  To me, "place=locality" would suggest a place that a person might have some interest in visiting, while "natural=cape" simply suggests a natural coastline feature with an official name.  However, if you feel that some of these points don't qualify for the "natural=cape" tag, you may revert them.
tux67 (2019-08-12 11:36:33+00:00): Hallo Bernd_41515,
du hattest ein review on diesem und den folgenden Changesets requested. 
Wie du schon ganz richtig erkannt hast, sind private Daten (wie dein Name am Haus) bei OSM fehl am Platz. Die Adressdaten an den beiden Garagen (beides mal Nr. 12) habe ich wieder entfernt, da die Adresse nur am 1x Haus gemappt wird. Die Poller sind mit 18 cm keine Poller im Sinne der Wiki Beschreibung:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
Soweit ich das sehe, sollen sie nur den Individualverkehr abhalten, nicht aber landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr. In dem Sinne waren 
sie bereits zuvor richtig gemappt (so wie ich das sehe, ist die Straße aber einer bestimmten Stelle nur für landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr frei). Grundsätzlich beinhalten bestimmte Wegtypen oder generelle access Tags bereits Standard Werte für den Zugang. So impliziert ein highway=path den Zugang  für Fußgänger, Radfahrer und Reiter. 
Diese brauchst du also nicht explizit zu mappen, sondern nur die Ausnahmen.
Gruß
tux67
tux67 (2019-08-12 15:19:24+00:00): Könnten wir vielleicht die gesammelten Änderungen in dieser Straße in diesem CS besprechen? Gruß tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73256534
bernd_41515 (2019-08-12 15:36:02+00:00): Die Routenplanung für Radfahrer und Fußgänger funktioniert auf dem bellinghovener weg nicht. (Ab Hausnummer 6 gerade aufsteigend in Richtung Bellinghoven Landwehr)
tux67 (2019-08-12 15:41:57+00:00): Danke fürs Feedback. Und das ist der Grund für die ganzen hin und her Änderungen?
Welchen Router verwendest du denn? Die wenigsten verwenden live Daten. Und es gilt, saß wir nicht für den renderer (oder Router) Mappen. 
Welche Verkehrszeichen stehen denn auf der Straße? (Und wo).
bernd_41515 (2019-08-12 15:52:40+00:00): Es ist der Routenplaner routing.openstreetmap.de 
dort die Fahrradroute.
In Höhe der Grundstücksgrenze Hausnummer 12 und Hausnummer 14 steht das Zeichen 250 Straßenverkehrsordnung Durchfahrt verboten für Kraftfahrzeuge aller Art ausgenommen landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr und Radfahrer.
tux67 (2019-08-12 16:00:08+00:00): Ok, wenn's recht ist schau ich mir das ganze Stück mal an und passe es ggf. Entsprechend an. Wie bereits gesagt .. Soweit ich mich erinnere arbeitet auch der OSM  Router nicht mit live Daten. Also bitte mal nicht weiter ändern. Gruß tux67
bernd_41515 (2019-08-12 16:01:57+00:00): Ok. Vielen Dank.
Gruß Bernd Demand
tux67 (2019-08-12 16:45:32+00:00): Also eigentlich müsste nach der Beschreibung das hier gemappt werden:
http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=250,1026-36

Aber das würde Rad Routing unterbinden.
Deswegen habe ich statt vehicle=agricultural - motor_vehicle=agricultural gemappt.
Ein Schild 1022-10 gabs ja nicht - oder?
 Bei den Routern tuts jetzt:
http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=17/51.06196/6.33927/osm-mapnik-german_style&lonlats=6.341246,51.063353;6.329981,51.062557

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=51.06385%2C6.34086%3B51.06227%2C6.32762#map=17/51.06271/6.33474&layers=N

http://maps.openrouteservice.org/directions?n1=51.061084&n2=6.33644&n3=17&a=51.063063,6.341397,51.062618,6.329981&b=1a&c=0&k1=en&k2=km

Es weitert sich der OSRM  Radrouter:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_bike&route=51.06235%2C6.34163%3B51.06179%2C6.33075#map=16/51.0654/6.3363&layers=N

Da würde ich jetzt erst mal abwarten.
bernd_41515 (2019-08-12 17:00:24+00:00): Dort ist weder ein VZ 1026-36 noch ein VZ 1022-10.
Auf dem Zusatzzeichen steht der Text "Landw. Fahrzeuge und Radfahrer frei"
tux67 (2019-08-12 17:02:32+00:00): Ok
bernd_41515 (2019-08-12 17:06:01+00:00): Danke. Jetzt funktioniert die Radfahrroute.
Kovoschiz (2019-08-16 15:32:25+00:00): Please explain your edit.
Kovoschiz (2019-08-21 11:41:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73576536
Kovoschiz (2019-08-16 15:32:16+00:00): Please explain your edit.
Kovoschiz (2019-08-21 11:34:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73257157
Kovoschiz (2019-08-21 11:34:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73576257
Kovoschiz (2019-08-16 15:32:11+00:00): Please explain your edit.
Kovoschiz (2019-08-21 11:41:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73576536
Kovoschiz (2019-08-21 11:42:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73576593
freebeer (2019-08-12 22:54:40+00:00): hi,

if you can find a better imagery than maxar, use that for better looking results.  here the archived clarity images from bing that are about a decade old, taken from aeroplane overflights, but have been better corrected to align the roads than any satellite imagery, recognised from being nowhere near as sharp.

i am guessing without checking that this is an amazon contribution, and i understand it is more important to you to get things approximately correctly on the map, rather than to create so-called ``beautiful'' curves that i would spend several times as long to create.

note the choice of imagery varies, and archived bing is a good rule-of-thumb for the continental us.  i have found it helpful to use the floating window feature my potlatch2 editor offers me so i can use the latest, unclear, poorly-aligned imagery to immediately detect if something visible on crisp mapbox has since been rebuilt, maxar being a good candidate for that.  i do not know if iD has that feature.

i should also give a heads-up that when you start mapping in canada, i have found the maxar imagery is much older where in some places, only bing shows thebuildings added.

my attention was also drawn to this changeset by detecting a duplicate node here, i will fix, and wondering who mapped things so far off from my background.  :-)

and if you are not amazon, sorry
freebeer (2019-08-12 23:36:12+00:00): wow, now that i have examined things, it seems you have been very busy as a team.

it seems this TN12 highway was split at the edwards mentioned in the changeset description from an over 10km length, several days ago, creating a virginal section to the north.

i would advise to be careful with this, when relations are involved, as that is how one of uber or lyft came to my attention on the west coast months ago.

(and i need a kezboard, not a touchscreen, as i had to re-type that, grrr)

here you can only get to the north section of tn12 directly from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/712975140 .  so i wonder, not understanding routing or mapping, if you would be directed to turn right, and after 0 metres, turn 180 degrees south at the co-located nodes on the north part.

it is an iD bug as far as i am concerned, and i think from the issue raised some months ago, it is known but unresolved.
reswara (2019-08-14 15:31:04+00:00): Hello Freebeer,

Thanks for your patience in looking into the edit. I have noted down the points and will ensure I share it with my team as well. We generally check all the imageries and pick the latest imageries as suggested by you. We use the latest along with the more clear imagery incase the latest imagery is not of high quality. We did not make any edits to TN12. Since the my edit was on the geometry of the segment and additions of residential roads were attached to TN12, it got tagged to my edit.
Apologies for the node duplication. Our team is working to figure out a continuous way to detect and fix them. We do try to make high quality edits and will ensure to do so going forward with suggestions and support of community members like you. Looking forward to learning more from you. Please continue helping us with your suggestions.
Regards
reswara
tux67 (2019-08-12 15:18:00+00:00): Bitte nicht das Name Tag verwenden um Dine zu beschreiben:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/73257611
cartomatto (2021-08-18 07:35:33+00:00): come mai hai marcato non percorribile un tratto di cresta tra il fraiteve e il col basset?
era un problema transitorio (se non erro c’erano stati incidenti su quella pista da sci in inverno) o ancora attuale?
solitone (2021-08-18 09:10:40+00:00): Quando l’ho percorso due estati fa l’accesso era vietato anche ai pedoni. NelLa stagione sciistica 2019-20 quella pista era ancora chiusa. Questo inverno non c’è stata stagione sciistica. D’estate non ci sono più stato e non so se è cambiato qualcosa.
cartomatto (2021-08-18 11:44:39+00:00): grazie. Sai il motivo per cui fosse chiuso? Lavori, frane, magistratura...?
solitone (2021-08-18 13:48:32+00:00): Penso a causa dei due incidenti sugli sci, magistratura
cartomatto (2021-08-23 16:34:07+00:00): immaginavo... cmq alcuni gg fa ho visto bici scendere nel tratto successivo, e quindi potevano provenire solo da lì. Ne desumo che sia in pratica nuovamente percorribile.
solitone (2021-08-23 20:09:21+00:00): be’ non vuol dire, io stesso ero sceso da lì nonostante il divieto, era l’unica possibilità che avevo per rientrare a Sauze...
Grillo (2019-08-12 19:47:57+00:00): The source for these was https://www.sscspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Safety_coordinates-shelters.pdf as indicated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1880547
SomeoneElse2 (2022-09-25 00:40:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126599332 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names from a suspect source; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6295