piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2016-01-27 21:10:32+00:00): Presently way 169174227 is tagged;

name=Blue Mountains National Park

boundary=national_park

This covers a very large area ... that is;

part of the Blue Mountains National Park (not the northern section)

all of;
Yerrandrie State Conservation Area
Yerrandrie Regional Park
Nattai National Park 

And others.

I have raised this on the talk au list and had this response
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2016-January/010865.html

I have added LPI sourced relations for things in this area. As such this way taggs are redundant.
MKnight (2017-09-30 11:32:59+00:00): moin, Du hast in diesem CS zwei place-nodes namens Hemmersbach bearbeitet und/oder erstellt. Einer der beiden liegt direkt auf einem Feld, ein anderer direkt in Horrem. 
Ich nehme an, dassnur letzterer korrekt ist, kannst Du da etwas dazu sagen?
dachefte (2017-10-02 10:03:42+00:00): Hi! Puuh, das ist lange her. Aber ich konnte es nachvollziehen: Natürlich ist nur der erste (2552339380) korrekt. Der zweite sollte das ehemalige Boisdorf sein, das Taggen nach dem C&P des Nodes hab ich damals offensichlich vergessen. Danke fürs Fehler aufspüren. Ist gefixt (Changeset 52559225).
MKnight (2017-10-02 10:06:30+00:00): Thx!
Warin61 (2019-06-19 01:12:27+00:00): Hi,

The extension to Way: Tianjara Fire Trail (132062232) looks to be a cliff line rather than a trail.
Looking at the LPI base map and imagery seems fairly clear to me.
BalancingBean (2019-06-19 08:30:03+00:00): Hmm,

Nice catch.

Not sure what I was doing there - 2 "roads" are definitely cliff lines per the LPI topo and LPI sat images.

I'll remove them shortly and mop up some nearby track naming too...
BalancingBean (2019-06-19 09:01:59+00:00): Corrected now :-)
Warin61 (2019-06-19 09:54:25+00:00): Back then all we had was imagery .. and not as good as it is now. Much better off now. In another 10 years???
BalancingBean (2019-06-20 11:12:56+00:00): :-)
I don't remember if the LPI topo was available in JOSM then either.
We are spoiled with the easy ability to switch from the LPI topo to LPI sat images (which are excellent quality)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-09 13:13:54+00:00): Hello!

You used
playground=swingy
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2624601936/history

Have you maybe meant
playground=swing
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?

If it is a mistake - can you fix it?
eggie (2019-11-17 15:10:20+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage...  maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen. bij deze opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
d1g (2015-04-09 16:11:38+00:00): 12Вк1? 12Вк2? Откуда?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-01 14:11:18+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170683978/history has access:bus = yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using bus access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bus ) be fitting at least equally well?

Usage statistics are sometimes wrong and should not be blindly followed, but are worth looking at - see http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/bus/&***/access%3Abus/
Rps333 (2020-01-01 17:10:48+00:00): Great work adding all the sidewalks. But they have to be connected to each other to enable routing. Can you connect them?
user_5359 (2016-07-06 04:09:24+00:00): Hello! For better description of your node please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0. Did your address changed to addr:street="South Street"?
user_5359 (2016-07-06 04:09:46+00:00): If you need help: You are welcome!
eggie (2020-12-02 20:05:51+00:00): Na zeven jaar weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Hungerburg (2022-12-10 14:42:04+00:00): Dear SK, the avalanche_protection features are still in place. Would you mind, if I change those to snow_bridge with underscore (as on the wiki :) and fence for barrier?
SK53 (2022-12-10 16:57:25+00:00): I suppose this is the consensus, I don't think they are fences though, even though they are distinctly barriers. 

There are all sorts of odd tags with avalanche protection (passive) and (active) which I think can lead to confusion : e.g., showing CatEx as aerialways. There is a distinct problem with proper snow fences (which are fences :-)) which protect from drifting snow (good examples on Parsennbahn), but not avalanches not being distinguished in some mapping from snow bridges.

There are also some more unusual avalanche protection features (not all of which I've been able to map, e..g. above Tasch). It might be worth exploring some of these on the community website.

Jerry aka SK53

PS. It's a very long way down from Spi da Baselgia to Zernez! I only learnt at the summit that many people took a local taxi up the forestry road to around 1800 m on the Zernez side and then walked to Lavin, but I did it the other way!
Hungerburg (2022-12-10 18:56:46+00:00): Hmm, snow bridges are barriers, I found a lot, that were mapped fence, nothing else. What would you call this, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/684105108 - those are like fins, the mountain sides concrete/stone/walls, the valley side a steep slope. Are those "berms"?
SK53 (2022-12-10 19:11:54+00:00): Yes I think I would call them berms. 

The one's I've mapped closest to this are in the Val St Antonien (and are very characteristic of Walser houses in that valley), and I did use berm (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Avalanche_protection#House_defenses_in_St_Antonien,_Graubunden).

It's a bit awkward that there are very good terms in DE and it's a little hard to translate or find the appropriate equivalent in EN.
SK53 (2022-12-10 19:33:30+00:00): I'm a little puzzled by these, because although they will disrupt an avalanche flow, they don't seem to be protecting anything on immediately downhill of the obstruction. Retaining wall is clearly wrong as one would expect a retaining wall to have the wall part to be on the lower side.
SK53 (2022-12-10 20:02:55+00:00): They are described as concrete wedges in this document: https://www.preventionweb.net/files/10851_avalancheprotection.pdf.

Long ago one of my Praktikants at UBS in Zurich was the son of the director of the Swiss Avalanche Institute, would be a useful contact now.
Hungerburg (2022-12-10 20:22:25+00:00): In New Zealand, "avalanche diversion berms" are built, but no image, but diversion sounds right to me.

The Arzler Alm Lawine 2019 destroyed most of protection that was there, so these are just rebuilds, they cost 600.000 Euro; https://www.ibkinfo.at/abschluss-sanierung-lawinenbauwerke - they call them Höcker (bump). If you put basemap aerial you see the destruction upwards. It reached settlements in the 1930ies last.

I guess the triangles are the berms, so a wall can be mapped top. The longish are dams, but I guess, I will not map a "dam" there :)
Hungerburg (2022-12-10 20:30:55+00:00): If you put the tiris DGM (lidar) in background, you will see the structures continuing further down and the big dam there too.
SK53 (2022-12-10 21:36:06+00:00): Ah, very interesting. The paper I linked earlier talks about "bumps" which are energy dissipation devices rather than straight protection (they have a high angled face which forces the flow into the air with some loss of energy). The discussion in the paper seems to always associate them with a lower dam feature.
Hungerburg (2022-12-10 22:16:07+00:00): The paper mentions Arzler Alm! The french site on same page here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8278528709 ?
SK53 (2022-12-11 10:13:44+00:00): Definitely time to start a thread on community.osm. I'll see if I can find some of the Icelandic & Norwegian examples, in the meantime there are also these above Pontresina https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981577482/history#map=17/46.49516/9.90856
eggie (2022-05-18 08:28:35+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstberciht ontvangen.. Bijdeze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2023-04-17 05:26:49+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage maar nooit een welkomsrmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Andrea Musuruane (2018-12-07 13:35:29+00:00): Ciao. Qual è la tourism=attraction del nodo 2626037300? Ciao, Andrea
Rps333 (2021-08-16 21:58:34+00:00): can you comment on this note?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2805952
Taksine (2023-06-15 09:08:44+00:00): Hi, I want to ask a question, how do you know that Чонг-Рангсу is the name of that river? I can't find any information about the Russian name of that river, and the Chinese name of that river isn't pronounced like that.
evgenykatyshev (2023-06-16 09:39:03+00:00): Hi. The edit was made a long time ago, I'm not certanly remember. I guess, I take this name from Soviet military map which available in internet.
wtavares (2017-08-30 00:24:57+00:00): Edifício mal assinalado. O tribunal fica no cruzamento a Av. da Liberdade (Que vem mal assinalado no mapa, como Avenida 15 de Decembro) e a Av. Amílcar Cabral (assinalado, também, erradamente como Av. Gustavo Monteiro)
Bratananio (2017-08-30 17:17:14+00:00): Pode com miuto gosto mudar, se sabe melhor.
Bratananio (2017-08-30 17:18:02+00:00): Pode com muito gosto mudar, se sabe melhor.
luschi (2015-04-23 18:06:46+00:00): please use for trees "natural=tree"
"natural=wood" or "landuse=forest" are wrong!
please fix this and other trees mapped from you.
thanks
Milos Cekovic (2015-04-26 14:49:22+00:00): These are not single trees, but in very most cases more than one tree or large bushes (hasel or similar). I agree with you tat single trees should be marked with natural=tree, e.g. the gloriuous oak tree on the Wintersinger Höchi. But in the case you are mentioning, natural=wood or landuse=forest is IMHO much more appropriate than single tree, because as said not single tree is there. The official guidance for natural=tree is saying: "Einzelner oder signifikanter Baum".

What should I do? Change or leave as-is?
luschi (2015-04-26 20:45:29+00:00): mapping trees or 2-3 trees in this way is not the best solution.
natural=wood is for woodland with no forestry and in this place defenitly wrong.
So better you change to landuse=forest.
in some places you can use natural=tree_row
you can use natural=scrub for hasel or similar. Hasel is in a lot of places only a bush and not a tree.
landuse=orchard is a other option.
to find the correct tag is in some places hard and so all the natural=... tags you can use as a area.
SomeoneElse2 (2023-02-14 00:15:23+00:00): Hello,
What's the significance of "designation=Historic Mill" on e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2627192242/history here?
Best Regards,
Andy
Invicta (2023-02-14 10:10:59+00:00): Hi Andy,
About 10 years ago I mapped all the historic mill sites in Perth & Kinross, Sources were the 1st edition OS Six-inch, the county maps by Stobie and Ainsley, and the fragments of Pont maps available online at the National Libraries of Scotland. Many of these have disappeared but some survive as ruins or house conversions etc. When I learned to use OpenStreetMap I put them on.
Regards,
Carol
SK53 (2023-02-17 17:16:31+00:00): Hi Carol,

These could probably do with review now that we have better buildings, as I don't think the archaelogical site tag fits. I noticed them awhile back when looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2255503162. Unfortunately it's now over 30 years since I stayed here, so can't recollect if I noticed other vestiges in the wood. There were Red-throated Divers on the river though.

Where there is an existing building it may be worth following what b-unicycling did for old creameries in Ireland (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcreamery) and the same principle could apply in other areas where there are old mills such as Lancashire.

I notice the one downstream is a flax mill (I'd rather assumed they were all jute). There were some interesting discussions on traces of flax growing in Brittany at French SotM in 2015 (old retting pits at the corners of fields etc).

In summary, there are plenty of folk interested in this sort of thing and it's worth consolidating tagging approaches.

Regards,

Jerry aka SK53
eggie (2019-02-14 10:34:55+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:09:18+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257129239
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 11:58:00+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47257686
dieterdreist (2017-07-06 11:06:50+00:00): The multipolygon that was created for Cartiera Latina, creates some problems. Also, roles (inner and outer) are mandatory for multipolygon relations, although the data is also interpreted without them. I will convert the multipolygon to a simple polygon to simplify the structure and to improve common data usage.
dieterdreist (2017-07-06 11:17:42+00:00): I have actually restructured the multipolygon rather than deleting it.
Viking81 (2017-07-06 15:45:01+00:00): Do what you think is best. Now I'm inclined to use polygons rather than multipolygons.
dieterdreist (2017-07-06 15:57:26+00:00): multipolygons are fine if you can reuse existing geometry or parts of it, but if there are adjacent polygons like the buildings in the eastern part here, you should not add the buildings but rather use only a common outline (i.e. all outside walls can create a closed polygon, do not include the inside walls, do not use overlapping outer ways in mp). I have created a big polygon around everything (and have reused your relation for this), including the outdoor spaces that connect the buildings.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-03-10 10:38:03+00:00): Moin Miple,

Heidehammer fragt, ob die Flurbezeichnung "Bremer Straße" richtig ist. Deinem Änderungssatz-Kommetar nach zu urteilen, war das wohl ein Versehen, richtig?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220002995
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317389763

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2115208

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
user_53559 (2020-03-13 16:16:50+00:00): Hallo,
das kann nur ein Versehen von mir gewesen sein, weil ich keine Flurbezeichnungen ändere, sondern ausschließlich Straßennamen.
LG
Miple
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-03-13 16:34:15+00:00): Moin Miple,
das habe ich mir schon gedacht. Danke für die Rückmeldung!
Gruß RW
pnorman (2015-03-09 20:50:36+00:00): This seems misplaced. Does this store have a physical presence?
keepright! ler (2023-09-01 16:04:01+00:00): For anyone who wonders about the comment: It’s based on a chapter from the OSM book by Jochen Topf: https://www.jochentopf.com/books/
Warin61 (2017-01-01 22:58:53+00:00): Node: 2628523302 - Forbes Rv Road looks to be out by some 50 meters .. there are other deviations along this road too. Possible side tracks?  My references are the LPI base map and the LPI imagery.
Papa Fletch (2017-01-02 11:20:16+00:00): I would have taken this from my Garmin GPS tracking.  I have found the tracking can sometimes be out by 20m or so.
Pathumthani (2020-06-05 10:05:41+00:00): Bitte Eröffnungdatum überprüfen!
user_404333 (2020-06-05 10:42:10+00:00): Gut gesehen, korrigiert. Danke.
naoliv (2015-04-20 21:17:28+00:00): Marcos, você copiou os nomes do mapa da Nokia?
naoliv (2015-04-20 21:49:37+00:00): Marcos, tem 13 changesets que você utilizou o mapa da Nokia como imagem de fundo: 20079030, 20079230, 20079283, 20080198, 20080389, 20086245, 20086695, 20086870, 20087304, 20087539, 20087881, 20088373, 20088621
Existem também 7 changesets que você utilizou os mapas do ArcGIS: 
19944330, 19944783, 19945305, 19946387, 19946413, 19969899, 19969936
Até onde eu sei a licença não permite a cópia ou utilização de tais mapas.
Existe mais alguma informação que você inseriu de outras fontes?
Muito provavelmente estes changesets precisarão ser removidos do servidor (conhecido como "redact"). Pessoas que fizeram alguma modificação em cima destes dados perderão todo o trabalho, se este for o caso.
Hanif IRM-RV (2020-10-19 04:13:52+00:00): Hi surveyor54!
I've changed this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257357197) and this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257357190) classification to the proper classification.
Thank you
kcwu (2014-11-25 16:50:37+00:00): 舊名用 old_name 來標就好了
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Old_name
eggie (2017-10-27 14:50:29+00:00): Opnieuw ....Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Janjko (2021-08-09 22:08:58+00:00): Pozdrav!
U ovoj promjeni prije 7 godina si na zgradu škole u Rapavelu dodao tag amenity=school. To bi značilo da je ovo škola koja je još otvorena. Nadam se da si još u doticaju sa ovim krajem, i da znaš je li ova škola stvarno još otvorena i prima učenike? Hvala na informaciji! Bavim se uređivanjem podataka o školama pa bi mi ovo pomoglo.
trial (2020-07-14 07:53:26+00:00): Le maxspeed=50 sur l'escalier de la Rue d'Ys (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257514454/history) m'a bien fait rigoler. Ah, ces rues que l'on découpe et où on oublie de vérifier le détail :-).
opendcc (2025-05-30 03:51:36+00:00): Rettungspunkte überprüft und an die korrekte Stelle geschoben. Ausnahme: FS-1011  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2630194578
BladeTC (2016-06-01 21:12:01+00:00): Essa Estrada existe?
dbf_ (2020-04-30 09:03:12+00:00): Добрый день,
можете подсказать, с какого источника здания 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3457302
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3457310
их не видно на снимках каких-либо.
Спасибо
VlIvYur (2020-06-06 10:14:38+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/b4SAN1TBqlA2r9UFmgmP_w
Отсюда и дальше. Удалил.
Haris IRM-ED (2022-12-12 03:28:58+00:00): Hi dlr,
Your edit looks awesome, i'd like to inform that i find this ways (tertiary road https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/341430790 and track road https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/257603873) are crossing each other.

Do you mind if i delete the track road i mention above? because based in any imagery, i find both of them have same geometry and causing crossing highways error.

Thanks for your understanding,
Happy Mapping
Tantri IRM-ED (2022-12-12 04:31:30+00:00): Hi dlr,
Your edit looks awesome, i'd like to inform that i find this ways (tertiary road https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/527000672 and track road https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/257602541) are crossing each other.

Do you mind if i delete the track road i mention above? because based in any imagery, i find both of them have same geometry and causing crossing highways error.

Thanks for your understanding,
Happy Mapping
FredB (2015-05-07 13:01:47+00:00): Je remets les trottoirs en 'highway=footway' comme indiqué sur le wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks
RicoElectrico (2021-01-14 13:58:57+00:00): Hej, wg tej uwagi wieża nie służy do obserwacji: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2497768
pelekPL (2021-01-14 14:10:27+00:00): No to uwaga jest do "dupy".
https://www.lubaczow360.pl/index.php/powiat/gmina-horyniec-zdroj/184-gora-brusno-365-m-n-p-m.html
Czy ta wieża wygląda na "transmisyjną"?
Владимир К (2015-12-09 07:01:35+00:00): Светофоры для автомобилей это только highway=traffic_signals, не нужно вешать на ту же точку crossing=traffic_signals, это только для пешеходного перехода.
Bierphysik (2023-11-08 10:18:01+00:00): Moin. Bist Du Dir sicher, dass dies ein highway=cycleway ist und nicht ein highway=path mit bicycle=yes? es stehen laut Luftbild diverse highway=path mit diesem way in Verbindung, die nie und nimmer allein durch Fahrradverkehr entstanden sein können.
Bierphysik (2023-11-08 10:20:10+00:00): bzw. eher highway=track mit bicycle=yes wegen der Breite des Weges
furban (2023-11-10 18:02:52+00:00): 10 Jahre später....
Das ist hat die Riedhalsstraße die in diesem Abschnitt für Autos gesperrt ist. Ein Track ist das also eigentlich auch nicht. Service passt auch nicht wirklich, weil die Straße komplett blockiert ist und da niemand mehr fahren kann. Außer halt Fahrräder. Ich gebe zu Cycleway ist auch nicht so ganz passendes, aber mir ist wohl weder damals noch heute was besseres eingefallen
Bierphysik (2023-11-11 10:24:34+00:00): Moin. Ein highway=cycleway korrespondiert in D idR mit dem Vorhandensein von https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Zeichen_237_-_Sonderweg_Radfahrer,_StVO_1992.svg.
Ich verstehe Dich, dass das hier so nicht ist. Ich denke das ist ein highway=track mit motor_vehicle=no und ggf. bicylce=yes.

=path und =track unterscheiden sich vor allem auch durch Ihre Breite.
Bierphysik (2023-11-11 11:29:25+00:00): Hier nochmal zur Verduetlichung wieso das relevant ist : https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=50.18309%2C8.69836%3B50.18542%2C8.70131

ein =cycleway kann von Fußgängern nicht verwendet werden (außer er ist mit foot=yes zusätzlich getaggt)
Bierphysik (2023-11-12 08:37:27+00:00): dürfen hier nur FG und FR fahren? Oder sind Motroräder, Mofas, Pfere, etc erlaubt?
furban (2023-11-12 09:12:57+00:00): Ich war da schon ewig nicht mehr. Kann das nach so langer Zeit nicht mehr sagen.
GerdP (2015-10-31 18:38:02+00:00): please review:
node 1670199508,node 1670199505
are tagged 
highway=living_street
maxspeed=30
I guess what you mean is that the short
part of the way between them should
be tagged with maxspeed=30 ?
eggie (2021-02-26 13:31:36+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage.. daarom opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2018-11-07 15:10:45+00:00): Hoi Hendrikklaas.. Je bent de oorspronkelijk mapper van deze choker. Die routeert nu niet (meer?) in OSM. Staat deze bollard hier terecht of moet hier wellicht een motor_vehicle=yes op? 
Groet,
Eggie
eggie (2018-11-07 15:41:57+00:00): PB contact
RicoElectrico (2021-05-19 16:38:18+00:00): Hej, ktoś anonimowo dodał uwagę dotyczącą nazwy którą dodałeś:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2675707
angys (2020-08-07 15:33:49+00:00): 3.111448,101.743796 should be abandoned Safari Lagoon
4rch (2014-12-19 22:34:42+00:00): I've corrected the tagging (removed highway=pedestrian and added man_made=geoglyph). Mapbox Satellite imagery shows that the memorial is a bit bigger and that 50% of the memorial are already covered with sand. Maybe in reality the memorial isn't visible anymore.
naoliv (2016-01-15 17:50:29+00:00): Richarles, você lembra qual fonte utilizou para inserir o nome dessas ruas?
leosw (2014-11-03 15:38:07+00:00): Hello,

I've already contacted you by private message (july 28).

I've already created a HRP relation 1 year before, as mentionned on this french page : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HRP

Please add modifications to this relation, and remove yours. If not, I'll will remove this duplicate.

Thanks a lot,

Léo
R0bst3r (2015-12-09 14:03:29+00:00): Hi q_un_go,
du hast mit diesem Changset viele Tags reingebracht, die hoer wohl nicht hingehören :)

Ich=bin
damit=einverstanden,
dass=meine
der=Nutzung
des=auf
die=bei
personenbezogenen=Daten

Siehe http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/dbG
Komisch, dass das noch keinem aufgefallen ist.
q_un_go (2015-12-09 14:19:04+00:00): Ja, mir auch nicht. :-) Ein typischer C&P-Fehler mit JOSM...
PatMosby (2016-10-14 22:23:52+00:00): Gebäude ist abgerissen
chrislybaer (2017-12-26 21:50:56+00:00): Hallo Seichter,
du hast in diesem Changeset bei vielen Gebäude in Erpfingen die addr:suburb zu Willmandingen geändert, was falsch ist.
Werde es in den nächsten Tagen beheben.
viele Grüße,
Chris
seichter (2017-12-26 23:49:02+00:00): Ist erledigt.
War auf Undingen gesetzt, Willmandingen war ebenfalls betroffen, Genkingen war ok.