piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2016-02-15 20:03:48+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a .
user_5359 (2016-02-15 20:40:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short question: What is the meaning of mari=mari?
Warin61 (2018-10-10 03:57:33+00:00): Hi,

For Way: 303633269 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
Scrub is not a 'landuse', in OSM the tag to use is 'natural=scrub'.
DaveF (2016-02-16 22:14:32+00:00): Hi Miko

FYI I've started a discussion on the Tagging forum regarding using relations to tag bridges.
ma-rt-in (2016-02-16 04:41:55+00:00): Naja das was du in opening_hours geschrieben hast, kann man leider nicht so einfach machen. Habs nun geändert.
Hjart (2016-02-15 21:20:13+00:00): Ups, det er en god ide at gå dine redigeringer igennem med en tættekam. Du laver dæleme nogen uheldige ting indimellem.
Martin Borsje (2016-02-16 22:12:29+00:00): Beste HLF.

Een intrigerend commentaar 'o'...;-)
De naam Stedelijk Gymnasium Arnhem stond al op het gebouw. Als je die ook nog aan het adres vastknoopt wordt de naam tweemaal op de kaart weergegeven. Ik heb daarom de naam van de adresnode verwijderd.
Alecs01 (2016-02-16 20:16:47+00:00): anche qua, una strada privata cancellata: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229569165/history
poi c'è questo landuse=construction http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398044920 se non conosci la zona che stai mappando, tieni almeno conto che le immagini di Bing sono del 2011, e prova anche a tenere in considerazione quello che mappano gli altri: lì dentro ci sono un bar (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3336423673) e un supermercato (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3336423672) mappati giusto un anno fa, dovrebbero suggerire che almeno il palazzo in cui si trovano è ormai costruito. Questa è una sequenza di Mapillary di maggio 2015 lungo la Via Emilia, mi pare non ci sia nessun cantiere (è sulla destra, le foto guardano a sud-est): http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/8C6z2d5PrqUW0ZO75YvrKA/photo. Non c'è nessuna fretta di mappare tutto il mondo nel minore tempo possibile, anzi, se vai più piano, e fai più attenzione, è senz'altro meglio.
Alecs01 (2016-02-16 20:05:50+00:00): anche qui, cancellati un giardino e un paio di percorsi privati
maraf24 (2016-11-05 10:44:10+00:00): Odtworzyłem usunięty tu węzeł miejscowości Tarnogóra.
MicDK (2016-02-16 16:59:45+00:00): Fint nok at du retter, hvis jeg har ensrettet for meget. 

Jeg vil blot sige, at jeg var nødt til at ensrette A. P. Møllersvej her ved helleanlægget, da navigation i OsmAnd ikke fungerede, som det oprindelig var tegnet ind.
malenki (2016-02-16 14:06:12+00:00): Hallo NikFehl,

den von dir gelöschten Ortsteil "Forsthaus" habe ich wiederhergestellt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/397645980/history
joost schouppe (2016-11-09 11:04:36+00:00): Considering the size, I've changed this to a dog toilet.
ma-rt-in (2017-02-19 22:20:26+00:00): Was ist eigentlich mit dem Kreisel L 12/K74? Ist der fertig?
MrWebber (2017-02-20 06:11:15+00:00): Keine Ahnung.
MrWebber (2017-02-20 06:23:22+00:00): http://mobil.volksfreund.de/nachrichten/region/bitburg/kurz/Kurz-Neuer-Kreisel-fuer-Verkehr-freigegeben;art753,4477610
Ist freigegeben.
ma-rt-in (2017-02-20 07:08:24+00:00): danke hab den kreisel mal aufgebaut
joost schouppe (2016-11-09 11:10:08+00:00): Does node 4008405717 mean the entire bit of land around there?
Aren't ways 396420072 and 398065610 dog toilets rather than dog parks?
Nakaner (2016-03-19 19:05:12+00:00): Ist das wirklich ein Nebengleis (d.h. Abstell- oder Ladegleis)? Oder führen Zugfahrten darüber, z.B. bei Zugkreuzungen?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260183367/history
martinum4 (2016-03-22 18:02:29+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/38004696 hab es korrigiert, hatte mich wohl verklickt...
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2016-02-16 09:50:19+00:00): JOSM: Du bist doof! Ich habe hier defnitiv "Details an Obernstraße, Rathausstraße, Niedernwall"  als ChangeSet Kommetnar eingegeben
gileri (2016-02-17 23:51:45+00:00): Bonjour,

Petite suggestion :

Les parking n'ont généralement pas d'adresse postale, de plus le nœud d'adresse existe déjà.

Je suggère d'enlever les infos d'adresse, à moins qu'une adresse de contact soit vraiment nécessaire, dans ce cas il est préférable d'utiliser contact:housenumber et contact:street par exemple.
user_5359 (2016-02-19 20:18:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If you want to see a building on the map, please use building=yes instead area=yes.
trigpoint (2016-02-16 13:04:45+00:00): If this is a trigpoint then it should probably be mapped as a survey point.
At 170m it is unlikely to be a significant summit.
SomeoneElse (2016-02-16 13:59:13+00:00): Where is the elevation from?  Neither the quoted source (OS OOC) nor either imagery used have it.  Was it, like http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36756253 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36818205 "from a noticeboard that happened to be nearby", or are you just copying from a copyright source?
CYM1988 (2016-02-16 14:24:57+00:00): I have gone to great lengths to ensure that any elevation data used in edits is copyright compliant and try where I can to source information from direct "on the ground" information (gps, survey, noticeboards, tourist guides, rambling groups). In this instance I took a random walk to the trigpoint and used GPS, rounding up to 170m, the closest to actual height as OSM dosen't display exacting decimal points as displayed on GPS reciever. I apologize however that my changeset comments are too vague in these instances and will explain future edits in more detail.
trigpoint (2016-02-16 18:46:37+00:00): Looking at bing imagery it looks too flat to be considered a summit, there is a reservoir there from what I can see. If you went there how come you didn't map this or the track up to it?
I would not consider this a significant summit that really needs to be mapped. Maybe change it to map the trigpoint?
Alecs01 (2016-02-16 19:55:59+00:00): altre due stradine di accesso a proprietà cancellate qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228672515/history e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228672529/history io le avrei taggate come service anzichè unclassified direi, ma continuo a non avere buoni motivi per cancellarle
Alecs01 (2016-02-16 19:51:35+00:00): un paio di percorsi cancellati anche qui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261623962/history e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190459322/history
zeraien (2016-02-16 01:48:29+00:00): ignore the invalid comment, just fixing bike lane locaitons
5m4u9 (2016-02-16 13:43:11+00:00): Gracias por seguir editando.

Revisando vi que hay errores... 

* qué ocurrió con la estatua de la rotonda? Por favor tener cuidado al editar y hacer clics.

* El biblio-avión ya esta registrado como biblioteca y como avión histórico. Se debe añadir ahí pero no crear el contorno del avión porque siempre faltará detalle para representarlo.
pantufla (2024-10-28 10:16:42+00:00): Gracias, lo actualicé un poco.
apbcn (2016-02-20 19:24:51+00:00): Han equivocado el nombre de la etiqueta "place". Debe ser village, con dos l, no vilage.

Un saludo.
MunicipalidadDePergamino (2016-02-20 20:33:26+00:00): Gracias. Ya lo cambié.
Luis36995 (2016-11-30 20:04:48+00:00): Comment does not match change , can you explain it?
northernpoint (2016-12-06 16:29:15+00:00): I am not sure, I might have hit save before changing the comment.
Alecs01 (2016-02-16 19:43:48+00:00): anche qua altre ways cancellate (solo perchè taggate access=private suppongo)
Alecs01 (2016-02-16 19:38:59+00:00): un'altra cancellazione qua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345714291/history gli altri edifici cancellati, puoi sempre spostarli/modificarli, invece che cancellarli e ridisegnarli da capo ...
Alecs01 (2016-02-16 19:36:18+00:00): ti avevo chiesto perchè avevi cancellato queste way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222040402/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203521783/history e invece di rispondere, le hai cancellate di nuovo senza spiegazioni da parte tua. Ti sembra corretto comportarsi così?
dieterdreist (2016-02-17 11:34:37+00:00): Anche il changeset comment non sembra pertinente, vorrei segnalare questa pagina wiki nel merito: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
@Alecs01 suggerisco di contattare la DataWorkingGroup qui: https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#Contact
GOwin (2016-02-16 10:27:41+00:00): As long as the data you're mapping is on-the-ground, and can be validated, i don't see why it should be a problem.
user_5359 (2016-02-19 20:57:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your change because I don't think you live on a crossing.
keithonearth (2017-04-16 00:40:57+00:00): Any idea why the riverbank relation of the Seymour River has the `name=Bear Island` tag on it? This seems like a mistake. If I don't hear otherwise I'll delete this tag, and may try to simplify the relation.
BC Trail Guides (2017-04-16 01:58:00+00:00): Error on my part. Bear Island is located directly south of the Seymour Falls Dam (the foot bridge crosses it).
keithonearth (2017-05-01 20:19:12+00:00): I've edited the riverbank relation's and island's name tags (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48317592) and think it should be good now. Please feel free to take a look and let me know if there are any issues.
chnav (2016-02-16 16:34:34+00:00): Скажите своему преподавателю - ХВАТИТ ПОРТИТЬ КАРТУ.
Hjart (2016-02-16 08:50:53+00:00): Direkte at angive created_by er unødvendigt. Det er i forvejen i databasen angivet for hvert enkelt objekt (punkt, vej eller relation), hvem der sidst har rørt det.
iWowik (2020-09-04 11:17:46+00:00): День добрый!
А "Кочуевского" это что?
Проспект, проезд, переулок, аллея, набережная?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398115655/history
jorge_o (2016-02-17 04:33:20+00:00): Hola MexicanRoad414: 
Desde mi punto de vista no hace sentido agregar a los nombres  "autopista de peaje"  Ya que tiene Highway = motorway --> autopista y toll=Yes --> peaje
Saludos
jorge_o
Traildino (2016-03-03 16:54:26+00:00): The relation should be restored, as it is the serious and good work of another mapper.
SomeoneElse (2016-03-11 00:29:56+00:00): Does anyone want any help restoring https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5489363/history ?
Traildino (2016-03-15 08:46:27+00:00): Fixed it: added national trails 120, 21, 223, 34 and 8 to super relation E9 part France. The national trails can now be edited without bothering about the super relation
SomeoneElse (2016-03-18 22:43:32+00:00): @Traildino - Thanks!
FTA (2016-02-17 02:57:39+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see you were trying to add a business in the Honolulu area. Unfortunately, you put all of the information on the actual city boundary. In addition, you modified streets on the other side of the planet. I have reverted these changes for now. If you need any help in adding something, I'd be happy to assist...just send me a message or comment back on this discussion.

Happy Mapping,
Ethan aka FTA
pyram (2016-03-05 23:20:48+00:00): Hallo ziltoid,
Du hast mit dem Eintragen der Gärten zwar nicht direkt einen Fehler gemacht (wenn, dann fehlt das "access=private").
Siehe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden

Dennoch ist das Erfassen von privaten Dingen nicht sonderlich beliebt: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/523335#map=18/48.78091/9.14737&layers=N
Princeps (2016-12-12 16:30:23+00:00): Обозначение светофоров http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
highway=traffic_signals - Обязательно. Обозначает светофор для автомобилей.
crossing=traffic_signals - Обязательно. Указывает что светофор для пешеходов. 
Но можно обозначить с каждой стороны по одному светофору для пешеходов, которые примыкают к обочине и будут находится на пешеходной дорожке. Также обозначить с каждой стороны по одному сфетофору для автомашин, которые будут находится у стоп-линии на шоссе. Итого четыре сфетофора. Fiхme здесь вообще не нужен
Владимир К (2016-12-12 17:55:58+00:00): спустя 10 месяцев сложно понять какой объекты вы имеете ввиду.
poornibadrinath (2016-04-15 07:56:45+00:00): Hey, @BelphegoR
You should not be using Google/yahoo as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F
Also there is some excellent documentation about OSM here - http://learnosm.org/
Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
DD1GJ (2016-02-16 10:11:32+00:00): Du brauchst nicht nach jedem einzelnen Gebäude abspeichern. Das bläht die Übersichtlichkeit und die Versionsverwaltung nur unnötig auf.
GOwin (2016-02-16 10:26:34+00:00): what do you mean by "this edition" and what "important study" are you referring to?
manings (2016-02-16 10:29:05+00:00): Hi, Whether it is for a research or not, as long as the data you add is true on the ground, there's no problem.  But, if its wrong, it will be removed or modified.  

Keep on mapping!
user_5359 (2016-02-20 05:10:20+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Auch wenn Ihre Geschäftsgrundlage Wasser ist, ist das Gebäude (auch laut Luftbild) kein See: Siehe auch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dwater. Ich habe mir erlaubt dies bereits zu ändern.
user_5359 (2016-02-20 05:13:43+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house ??
user_5359 (2016-02-20 05:12:47+00:00): Nochmal Willkommen bei OSM! Wäre es sinnvoll auch als Museum zu klassifizieren: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dmuseum ?
Warin61 (2016-11-20 21:33:01+00:00): Hi,
You have marked way 196266984 as noname=yes ... if you zoom in it has a name. I have corrected it.
maraf24 (2016-04-02 21:42:20+00:00): Tego budynku nie ma:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398150331
platlas23 (2016-04-06 07:57:04+00:00): cele to este nieje zburane
indigomc (2016-08-09 16:08:19+00:00): This changeset shifted the boundary between Sedam Taluk of Karnataka and Mahbubnagar district Telangana about 500m to the north and west. This contradicts the Karnataka state maps at http://www.kpwd.gov.in:8080/webris/webris . It would be useful to have the source for this change so as to have a consistent border.
Zverik (2016-02-16 13:53:50+00:00): А что, там ничего не снесли?
literan (2016-02-16 20:42:46+00:00): были вот такие теги: note=Снесено в феврале 2016
was:building=yes. Чтобы никто по бингу или панорамам вновь не нарисовал
Zverik (2016-02-16 20:46:54+00:00): Понятно, спасибо.
user_5359 (2016-02-22 08:37:17+00:00): Danke für die Ergänzung des OSM-Datenbestandes. Kurzer Hinweis: Ich habe den Geschäftstyp auf Grund der Beschreibung von shop=supermarkt nach shop=pet (siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop#Andere) geändert. Sollte eine andere Beschreibung besser passen, bitte ich um Änderung und Schließung von der Notiz https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/516781
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
SHARCRASH (2016-02-18 12:08:08+00:00): Hello, 
When editing, please make sure that:
- ways are connected, otherwise planing routes and other routing functions won't work
- for MP relations, lines are connected and perimeter is correct 
Errors since your last edit:
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5940626#map=18/49.76454/5.73299
- http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=5.72771&lat=49.76137&zoom=15&opacity=1.00&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,touching_inner_rings_hull,touching_inner_rings,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags
Thank you for your comprehension!
SHARCRASH (2016-03-17 09:06:48+00:00): Since you don't show up, I reconnected myrself the ways and corrected the MP.
Please, next time just make sure things are alright. :)
Amodef (2016-03-17 10:09:14+00:00): Hi ! Sorry to have been a bit late to answer you. I usually check twice to be sure to not let a track unconnected, but no one is perfect, right ? :)

About this particular place, I've passed lot of time unlinking the roads/tracks from the residential area (they have nothing in common, really).

By the way, what are these residential area for ? It does not correspond to any physical reality... Any idea ?
SHARCRASH (2016-03-17 10:49:51+00:00): No problem for the late feedback. OSM is about free dedication. :) Indeed no one is perfect, myself i make errors and come back on tools like OSM Inspector to check if i didn't leave any awkward element.

You don't need to unlink them, they just share the same line structure for the mechanical of plotting, as long as the position is roughly OK. There is no rule in OSM Wiki that says they are not allowed to share the same element like a node, line, area AKA polygon, area relation AKA MP relation or other relations (for example virtual hiking routes on physical ways). So instead of having 3 or even sometimes 4 lines overlapping, there is only one line sharing all those elements. Sharing the same line for different elements allows many advantages: 
- less data to be managed by the OSM server. 
- easies plotting and future edits or updates.
- saves time
See it as an advanced method to plot in OSM.

The residential area surely describes a physical reality. :) It's for areas where people reside, in general it's an urban area. So by extension also for companies, retails and public buildings, but for these there are more specific elements. You certainly noticed that many users plot extensive resid. areas to define an urban area and maybe later on they plot more specifically the dedicated commercial, retail areas, etc. If they don't have the time or do not need that level of detail they leave the resid. area. as a more general approach. I guess it's not so important for small towns, villages... where sometimes there are just a few shops or companies.
Amodef (2016-03-17 12:42:31+00:00): About the residential area, do you think that I should map legal informations (where buildings are allowed to be built) or the situation in situ ? They are usually very close, but the first is clearly defined, while the second is more subjective.
---
Legal situation is publicly available on the official cartographic websites.
---
About sharing the same line between areas and tracks, I'll try to use it more often, but I don't really like to have to deal with areas when I only want to improve tracks path... ^^

This said, I do join adjacent areas whenever possible.
SHARCRASH (2016-03-17 16:13:05+00:00): Replied you in private message.
Gumeg (2016-02-21 13:52:36+00:00): Приветствую на ОСМ. Просьба в комментарии к правке писать действительно то, что делаете. Сейчас у вас все правки с одним и тем же комментарием.
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
Peda (2016-04-24 10:49:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 38830605 where the changeset comment is: Revert changesets of user Дмитрий-Одесса due to vandalism: duplicated nodes, removal of nodes,... (See http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=588679#p588679 or contact the DWG)
sorcrosc (2016-02-16 18:28:34+00:00): Non mettere i nomi dei paesi nelle aree residential per favore. Sono già presenti i place
Semilsent (2016-02-18 18:20:45+00:00): Ok grazie mille, sto iniziando ora a conoscere il sito, ne terrò conto.
Piskvor (2016-02-16 15:33:38+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap; thanks for a nice changeset description :)

I see that you're trying to improve the map - but please check the surroundings in the editor before rushing in.

There are, currently, three street-level entrances into Staroměstská station: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/248124655 http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/248124657
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3426740041

See the OSM wiki for the difference between 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:station=subway?uselang=en (the actual station) and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=subway%20entrance?uselang=en (access to the station).

You have, instead of adding an entrance, moved the underground station itself, out from the location where it lies. Were you really trying to do that?
Trace Stierhoff (2016-02-16 15:49:03+00:00): Nooooooooooope.

It seems that the station is a block and a half long. Why is an end point showing up on the maps which is 2 blocks away from the entrance- instead of the entrances?
Piskvor (2016-02-16 15:49:45+00:00): Note the metro line (grey and dashed): http://i.piskvor.org/osm/staromestska.png . That zigzag definitely isn't on the tracks ;) I have reverted the station to the previous version, so all is fixed now :)
Piskvor (2016-02-16 15:52:51+00:00): The entrances are also showing on the map (see the image). The length is correct - the escalator tunnel also contributes to this; and anywhere you look on the map, the center point of the station is mapped as "the" station. See e.g, Narodni Trida: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/24569095
Piskvor (2016-02-16 15:58:56+00:00): I do agree that the entrances should be rendered more prominently, though.
user_5359 (2016-02-22 08:27:55+00:00): Danke für die Ergänzung des OSM-Datenbestandes. Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Punkt, die nur einen Namen besitzen sind sinnlos. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a . 

Ach übrigens fehlt im Namen ein t. Laut Google Suche hat der Verein auch eine Webseite, die darf gerne auch ergänzt werden.
user_5359 (2016-02-22 08:25:24+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte achte auf die Kommentare. Hier wurde ein Hochstand gelöscht. Existiert dieser wirklich nicht oder soll erfuhr von der Karte verschwinden?
malenki (2016-04-09 07:56:54+00:00): Welchen Sinn hat es, einen POI zu löschen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2159618907/history
und ihn an gleicher Stelle neu einzutragen?:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4009436598/history

Das ist Unfug und wird nicht gern gesehen (um es mal diplomatisch auszudrücken). Bitte arbeite an deiner Mappingtechnik.
user_5359 (2016-02-22 08:21:44+00:00): Danke für die Ergänzung des OSM-Datenbestandes. Bitte beachte, dass in OSM die Objekte vorrangig beschrieben werden und erst dann benannt werden. Punkt, die nur einen Namen besitzen sind sinnlos. Als Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie bezeichne ich was?" empfehle ich die Seite http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:14:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
kreuzschnabel (2018-03-01 07:04:03+00:00): Nur aus Interesse: Welchen Sinn hat es, Grenzen von NSG mit layer=-1 zu taggen? Sind die irgendwie unterführt, wenn ja, unter was?
OSMBenutzer13 (2018-06-03 14:11:27+00:00): layer gelöscht; war bei dem benachbarten LSG ebenfalls -1; War wohl ein copy and paste Fehler.
EneaSuper (2016-02-16 14:45:06+00:00): Oddio, ma era ancora mappato? Da non crederci!
zool (2016-02-18 19:25:12+00:00): Can i ask what is the source of the street address and house number data? Is it from physical survey?

cheers
Hjart (2016-02-16 18:21:49+00:00): Pedestrian betyder i denne sammenhæng gågade. Dette er snarere en footway.
Michael Olsen (2016-02-16 18:33:10+00:00): Ret god pointe - der er heller ingen butikker :-)
muralito (2016-02-24 00:05:55+00:00): Tenes que tener mas cuidado cuando editas limites. Si dejas los poligonos de limites rotos como hiciste con este cambio despues por ejemplo las busquedas no funcionan, porque no se sabe que es adentro y que es afuera del limite.