piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-10-08 22:02:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
pio2_122 (2019-10-09 08:50:51+00:00): Proszę, nie rozciągaj edycji na trzy powiaty!
Ijon_Tichy (2020-02-17 19:56:15+00:00): Co w tym złego właściwie?
ma-rt-in (2019-10-09 21:51:32+00:00): Hallo,
wie kann es sein das die L16 zwischen Schloßheck und Oberlauch eine hhere Bedeutung hat, aber nicht zwischen Oberlauch und Schönecken?
vg
Nakaner (2019-10-09 22:35:19+00:00): Hallo,

ich bin mit dem Auto von Schönecken über Oberlauch und Niederprüm nach Prüm gefahren. Zum Ausbauzustand des Abschnitts westlich von Oberlauch kann ich nichts sagen.

Ich hänge nicht an der Herabstufung des Abschnitts. Das ist mir einen Streit nicht wert. Aber für secondary war mir die Straße ohne Mittelstrich und aufgrund ihrer Trassierung nicht gut genug.

In der Eifel sind mir bezüglich der Klassifizierung noch keine so Schnitzer wie im Pfälzer Wald begegnet (z.B. L 505, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112355545/history). Aber ich habe das Gefühl, dass in Deutschland die ein oder andere L und K eins zu hoch eingestuft ist.

Viele Grüße

Michael
ma-rt-in (2019-10-09 22:37:20+00:00): Hallo,
streiten will ich mit dir nicht, wollte nur mal nachfragen, da es ja auch keine wirklich alternative da oben gibt. Aber lassen wir es mal so wie es ist.
Danke für die Info. Das mit der Pfalz guck ich mal an.
vg
parsd51 (2019-10-09 10:35:22+00:00): Hi
Will you please state the detailed reasons for the changes?
Hjart (2019-10-09 19:29:59+00:00): Der er desværre endnu ikke Mapillary billeder her, så vi kan tjekke skiltningen, men at den østlige rundkørsel skulle være motortrafikvej, ser for mig en anelse mistænkeligt ud.
@Bulls_eye What was your sources for this change?
osmviborg (2019-10-09 20:25:55+00:00): Check http://cvf.vd.dk/cvf/mapui.jsp
Bulls_eye (2019-10-09 21:39:45+00:00): Hello all,

I made these changes based on ground level imagery, global & local policy, and some by my own judgment.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.80949849997225&lng=12.105078000000049&z=17&pKey=uCw5bWhHPD9PCvHiVBFobQ&focus=photo&x=0.6888763339261883&y=0.6147275846509603&zoom=1.446576490469858&dateFrom=2019-08-01

In this image, I can see that the sign leads to 53/211, which has been classified as primary, so I reclassified the primary link to a primary way, based on the fact that it has this ref tag and links usually do not have ref tags.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.80951780000001&lng=12.104588400000011&z=17&pKey=8pA94TsJIbh-NqArYdkmMw&focus=photo&dateFrom=2019-08-01&x=0.5422528413829993&y=0.6428354479075303&zoom=0

In this image, I can see the sign leads to the 53 expressway, so I reclassified the ways west of the roundabout to trunks per this page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway:International_equivalence

As I previously noted, highway links do not typically have ref tags, so I removed link tags from ways with ref tags, and did my best to make them as continuous as I could with the existing route classifications.

The tertiary ways were isolated, and this is not a best modeling practice. I reclassified those to be continuous with their route.

Without ground level imagery of the west-most roundabout, and without more recent aerial imagery, I cannot confirm whether my scheme is completely correct, but I did it to the best of my knowledge of local and global policy after using the Mapillary images as clues.

Please let me know if you would like to discuss any of these changes further. If you can point me to other resources that would help me with this junction, or Danish roads in general, I’d be happy to hear your feedback.

Thanks!
parsd51 (2019-10-10 13:10:41+00:00): Thanks for your feedback.
I had overlooked the trunk sign. I haven’t seen trunks going into junctions like this before.
I agree with you that some of the connections are actually just the road 53 which continues.

I hope to get some Mapillary soon.
Bulls_eye (2019-10-10 17:50:54+00:00): More Mapillary would be great!
Frans S (2019-10-09 17:46:06+00:00): Hi Daniel. A few remarks,
See the instructions please. No need to map tracks into acres etc.
Extend and connect highways to each other please
Don't map highways through buildings either
I mapped quite a number of highways, but there are more to map on this task. I invalidate it.
Best regards
viloan (2019-10-08 23:10:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
WoodWoseWulf (2019-10-09 00:09:23+00:00): Hi Thomas,

The some of the available OSM friendly imagery here is quite recent and doesn't show any footpaths at this location. I normally wouldn't question things like this, but considering you've added quite a few fictional features to the map recently, do you have any evidence that these exist?
mavl (2019-10-23 17:36:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76115760 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75627340].
mavl (2019-10-24 15:16:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76158559 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75627340].
naveenpf (2019-10-09 00:45:02+00:00): A group chat for OSM Contributors of India. Welcome to the family.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/75433999
TheBestIdea (2019-10-10 14:56:19+00:00): Hey mjaredm, Thanks for updating. Any idea if bike lanes are going in between 155th and 162nd St or if there is going to be gap? DOT presentations haven't been totally clear.
mjaredm (2019-10-12 02:09:34+00:00): I’m almost positive there’s going to be a gap. I’m not sure why, it seems kinda silly. The only ideas I have are subway station construction work, or a community board district border.
naoliv (2019-10-09 03:40:31+00:00): Oi, Tatiane.
Essas calçadas são para algum trabalho seu? (ou estão sendo inseridas por algum motivo específico)
tyos (2020-02-10 00:05:13+00:00): This edit added street parking as nodes, tagged with amenity=parking.  This tag should only be used for parking lots.  Street parking should be mapped as ways, tagged with parking:lane=*.
CurlingMan13 (2024-05-01 07:29:39+00:00): In at least one instance, parking nodes were spammed in an area rather than using a parking area.  Changeset has been reverted in part or full.
geoaria (2019-10-11 18:12:05+00:00): عزیز دل 
شما باعث بهم ریختگی در خمینی شهر شده اید..یک مسیر را به عنوان آزادراه motorway تگ گذاری کرده اید. (32.68829/51.53355)
از ادیت های شما این طور که به نظر می رسد به ویرایش نقشه نا آشنا هستید لطفا به حداقل اطلاعات لازمه ویرایش نقشه های osm با مطالعه مسلط گردید و سپس به ادیت بپردازید.
ادیتهای شما تمام نقشه را به هم ریخته است.
AndersAndersson (2019-10-09 04:43:50+00:00): Some of these are on golf courses. I guess they are not jet_bridges.
Burisma (2019-10-12 09:59:55+00:00): Many of these were totally wrong. I'm suspecting a wrong iD preset, but haven't nailed it down yet.
SomeoneElse (2019-10-12 10:14:33+00:00): @Burisma Can you explain what you were trying to do here?  I can't understand how someone can look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732184575/history and decide that "obviously the highway=corridor tag should be removed".  If you'd like to find out why someone tagged something in a certain way, I'd just ask them (like you have done for other features at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10261343&commented ).
Regards,
Andy
Burisma (2019-10-13 02:45:39+00:00): Actually I've wanted to remove the "aeroway"="jet_bridge" from the way you've mentioned. It was mapped as isolated fragment parallel to the pre-existing cycleway (now tagged as bridge: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/734029826).
user_5359 (2019-10-09 04:22:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
Is your business a shop http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop or office http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office or a craft http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft ?
IMJustice Marketing (2019-10-09 12:39:34+00:00): It's a home office, where I also have taken local appointments as well ...
freebeer (2019-10-09 13:14:48+00:00): regarding
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379674429/history

i am having a slight mental disconnect, trying to relate a two-level building that is 30 metres tall.

i suppose it is possible for a cathedral or similar, but these appear to be condominiums
user_5359 (2019-10-09 14:39:33+00:00): The question is not how big the office is, but what kind of job you do (if you are not looking for names but for marketing agencies (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aoffice%3Dadvertising_agency)).
Colleague freebeer wants to point out the standard unit of height is meter. Height=30 means 30 meters, but also 30ft (9.41 meters) seems quite big to me (unfortunately I overlooked it).
IMJustice Marketing (2019-10-09 14:39:50+00:00): Oh, I understand now ... No, the "building" is that tall, I only have cathedral ceilings in my 2nd floor home and office ... Plus, a front and rear balcony ...
IMJustice Marketing (2019-10-09 14:46:39+00:00): creating, planning, and handling advertising (and sometimes other forms of promotion) for its clients.

That seems to kind of say it right on ... If asked in person, I would say I am a Lead Generation & Marketing Strategist ... I am also a Business Coach & Author ...

Before defining myself, I used to just say I'm a Marketing Consultant ... Then, when asked what I do, I would reply with discussing what they know, what they do, and what they would like to or can afford to do .... But, the right way, which is to discuss Strategic marketing over all of the Tactical methods we may have all heard about or tried ...

Good enough?
IMJustice Marketing (2019-10-09 14:48:11+00:00): Very difficult to be "short" and quick with an answer ... I don't want to over-simplify, or cut myself short in any way ...
viloan (2019-10-09 02:10:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
geoaria (2019-10-11 18:21:58+00:00): شما باعث خطا در نقشه شده اید . مسیر هایی که از روی هم عبور می کنند یا باید باهم تقاطع داشته باشند و در صورت غیر همسطح بودن به صورت پل یا تونل تگ گذاری گردند. شما خیلی از مسیر ها را قطع کرده یا حذف کرده اید و ارتباط بین مسیر ها را از بین برده اید و مسیر های جدید را به درستی تگ گذاری نکرده اید. مسیر های مسکونی با تگ residential مشخص می شوند و مسیر های درجه یک شهر بسته به اهمیت با secondary و tertiary و primary تگ گذاری می شوند. خواهشمند است دست از تغییراتی که باعث خطاهای مکرر در نقشه می شود خودداری کنید.
viloan (2019-10-09 03:07:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Mark Esperanto (2019-11-08 05:26:51+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76786823 due to fake features
TravGW (2019-10-09 21:59:33+00:00): Once again I must ask you to please stop converting roads with a center turning lane into a divided highway.
AverageOSMEditor (2019-12-17 04:56:00+00:00): I didn't know so I decided to quit it.
yumean1119 (2019-10-09 05:17:37+00:00): 島根県の公式情報あり。

（主要地方道松江木次線）雲南都市計画道路事業３・３・２号新庄飯田線
https://www.pref.shimane.lg.jp/infra/road/kikan/unnan_kendo/jigyousyoukai/chihoudou.html
c2r (2019-11-01 12:39:07+00:00): It was a numbered crossroads,not really a motorway_junction...
kuhni74 (2024-02-21 12:09:00+00:00): Hallo! Gleiche Frage wie bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75490202, aber in diesem Fall zur Relation 37. Da gibt es bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4120556 eine merkwürdige Lücke. Vielleicht hat diese Lücke ja auch Benutzer Club Touristi Triestini verursacht, für mich schwer nachzuvollziehen. Nähere Details siehe oben verlinkte Note.
user_5359 (2019-10-09 15:07:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2019-10-09 15:08:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (you are not a church). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
Christopher (2019-10-20 18:45:34+00:00): Hallo Kiekin,
warum hast du an dem Rettungspunkt den Namen "Rettungspunkt 1013" hinzugefügt? Der Rettungspunkt hat keinen eigenen Namen, der von dir angebrachte Name ist lediglich eine Interpretation der Tags highway= und ref= siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
Christopher
user_5359 (2019-10-09 15:09:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
aseerel4c26 (2019-10-09 18:23:03+00:00): siehe dazu https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1392437
chnav (2019-10-10 05:36:15+00:00): Здравствуйте, НИЧЕГО НЕ УДАЛЯЙТЕ без основательных причин. Руины здания - надо было поменять теги, а не удалять и рисовать заново. Типичное поведение новичков - "удалю и нарисую лучше". никогда так не делайте. Спасибо.
chnav (2019-10-10 05:38:56+00:00): Правка частично откачена. Тег здания disused
chnav (2019-10-10 05:39:45+00:00): Если слишком разрушено, то abandoned
user_5359 (2019-10-09 15:15:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
freebeer (2019-10-09 19:38:30+00:00): the name should also include just the name and not a description as well.
dazerine (2019-10-23 19:34:02+00:00): Ordoño no es un cycleway. Es pedestrian en su totalidad, con tráfico de buses en un sentido y bicis en ambos.
highway=pedestrian
bus=yes
bicycle=yes
oneway=yes
oneway:bicycle=no
lanes=2
dazerine (2019-10-23 20:05:38+00:00): Aclaro: opino que es pedestrian porque su carácter es más simialr al del resto de calles peatonalizadas, que a lo que describe el wiki como cycleway (infraestructura ciclista que es parte de una carretera). Esto, si bien está asfaltado, el ayuntamiento la considera peatonal, con acceso de bus/bici, pero no parece un "carril bici"
mavl (2019-10-22 16:22:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
mavl (2019-10-22 16:22:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
mavl (2019-10-22 16:22:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
KVLA-HRO-Mei (2019-10-09 16:36:29+00:00): Hi, nur eine kurze Frage, ob die Hausnummern "17-20" wirklich beabsichtigt waren? Die stehen doch schon an den Hauseingängen dran?
mavl (2019-10-22 16:23:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
Frans S (2020-01-06 09:47:46+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping on this project.
I review mappings before validating them
A remark. Please review your knowlege about  highways. You tag a through going highway here as service road. Unclassified should be a better tag.
Best regards
Frans S (2020-01-10 08:07:55+00:00): Hello Mantvydas.
Thanks for mapping here.
I review mappings and validating tasks.
A request. 
Please map as accurate as possible and square each building by pressing the Q key in iDeditor while the building is selected.  You missed quite a number of buildings which are not proper squared. (51 out of 90)
Best regards and keep mapping
ammendir (2019-10-09 08:03:53+00:00): Created Service Road.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-10-09 07:47:14+00:00): sorry! it should "undiscussed import", not "undiscussed changeset"
eggie (2019-10-09 08:18:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Het gebied van je edits is zo groot geworden omdat je de parkeerplaats hebt vastgeplakt aan de landuse = residential van Heerle. Ook zit de parking vastgeplakt aan het gebouw. Het is beter om die vlakken los te houden

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-10-09 08:22:12+00:00): Een parking kun je beter aangeven met amenity=parking. 
Een parking_space is een afzonderlijk parkeervak.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space
eggie (2019-10-09 08:43:25+00:00): Het vlak heb ik losgemaakt van de residential/ gebouw  en omgezet naar parking. Gelijk maar de oude landuse aangepast. Er lag nog bos en gras op het gebouw. 
De pitches zou je evt. van sport=?  kunnen voorzien.
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2019-10-22 16:22:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
mavl (2019-10-22 16:22:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
mavl (2019-10-22 16:22:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 76058554 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3221].
user_5359 (2019-10-09 15:19:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Frans S (2020-01-08 15:29:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I review mappings and validate tasks
A remark. Please square all buildings you map with the Q key in iDeditor,
Best regards and keep mapping
JezCrow (2019-10-10 03:53:11+00:00): Hi priymose,
I don't think this service road connects to The Viaduct - it should continue underneath.
priymose (2019-10-10 11:37:37+00:00): Hi JezCrow,

Thanks for looking into my edit. This is an honest mistake. I understand the mistake now and will be more careful going forward. I have made changes to the segment, refer change set #: 75508226. Please let me know for any other changes as per local knowledge. Always happy to learn from the community.

Regards,
priymose.
user_5359 (2019-10-09 14:50:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.