piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 21:28:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
majid1359 (2017-11-18 07:25:09+00:00): تغییرات انجام شود
mavl (2018-12-25 19:48:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:32:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:09:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:13:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:26:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:27:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:44:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:35:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
hsimpson (2017-12-05 16:04:31+00:00): Hi,
auch hier wäre es schön gewesen, wenn du die Fehlermeldung zu der Verbindung dann auch geschlossen hättest :)
Viele Grüße
mavl (2018-12-25 19:48:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2017-11-18 08:41:33+00:00): In principe taggen we geen adressen op de gebouwen zelf, maar op de adresnode. Wellicht een terugmelding doen bij het kadaster, want daar bestaat het adres niet?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=geldeloozepad,%20goes&resultOffset=0&objectId=0664100000004738&geometry.x=51047.637400512&geometry.y=392900.4415982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0664100000004738
mavl (2018-12-25 19:54:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Supaplex (2018-01-21 05:19:16+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2018-12-25 19:52:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:12:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:36:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Jakka (2017-11-18 17:27:08+00:00): Thx for adding. The use of name:en tag is used when there is a real translation of the tag name. thx
eggie (2017-11-18 09:25:27+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Nakaner (2017-11-18 09:25:02+00:00): Hallo nk63,

seit diesem Änderungssatz ist der Waldweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28027647 für alle Fahrzeugklassen und Fußgänger ausgenommen forstwirtschaftliche Kfz gesperrt. Ist das Absicht? Ist es Absicht, Fußgänger und Radfahrer auszusperren?

Die Access-Tags (access=*, vehicle=*, motor_vehicle=*, bicycle=*, …) sind hierarchisch aufgebaut, d.h. wenn access=forestry getaggt ist, dürfen nur zu Fuß gehende Forstarbeiter den Weg benutzen, aber keine Spaziergänger, außer es ist foot=yes getaggt, weil foot=* das übergeordnete access=* überschreibt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Könntest du das bitte korrigieren?

Du kannst auf diesen Änderungssatzkommentar nicht per E-Mail antworten, sondern musst dich auf openstreetmap.org einloggen und kannst dann unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53894623 eine Antwort schreiben.

Viele Grüße

Michael
BeKri (2017-11-18 09:56:37+00:00): Servus,
Die Adresse ist 2* eingetragen, am Umriss UND extra als node, das ist unüblich.
Ich empfehle den node wieder zu löschen.
Gruss derBeKri
mavl (2018-12-25 19:36:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:20:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:08:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:17:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:32:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:42:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:27:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:26:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:19:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:22:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:27:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:50:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:37:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
surveyor54 (2017-11-18 13:46:38+00:00): Hi projekttm,

kurze Frage, wg. Forstarbeiten weggefallen;
bedeutet das, nicht mehr vorhanden (kann ich mir nicht vorstellen), z.Zt. nicht benutzbar, oder ...

Kläre mich bitte auf!

Gruß
surveyor54
projekttm (2017-11-18 19:15:38+00:00): Hallo Surveyor54,

ich bin ein newby bitte etwas Nachsicht, bin für alle Anregungen offen.

Zu den Fragen : Löffelplatz ist ein Baum mit dem Schild "Löffelplatz" und einen verschraubten Löffel. Ich habe leider kein passendes Symbol gefunen. Bei Muße bitte ergänzen. Wenn ich das Passende finde ergänze ich es selbst.

Zur Änderung am Säunickels Kleiderschrank: die Waldbesitzerin, Alice von Schlabrendorff, lässt monentan erhebliche Rodungsarbeiten durchführen. Dabei werden viele Trampelpfade mit Ästen usw. zugeschüttet. So z.B. das hier betroffene Stück. Nette Menschen räumen gelegentlich wieder einen Trampelpfad frei. Wenn ich beim Waldspaziergang mit dem Hund eine Änderung im Wegenetz sehe, trage ich sie ein.

Ich schaue mir meine Änderungen noch mal an und versuche sie zu verbessern.

Gruß projekt
surveyor54 (2017-11-18 21:33:00+00:00): Hi,
natürlich haben wir Nachsicht mit newbies, doch wir müssen dich auch auf Fehler aufmerksam machen.
Löschen sollte man nur, wenn etwas nicht mehr vorhanden ist, sonst das Vorhandene umzeichnen (korrigieren) oder das Tagging ändern.
Der Löffelplatz könnte man wie folgt taggen:

natural=tree
name=Löffelplatz
vielleicht noch
place=location 

Die Wege könnten ja in absehbarer Zeit wieder frei geräumt sein, dann müsstest du sie wieder neu eintragen. Um die zu vermeiden, könnte man sie folgendermaßen taggen.

disused:highway=track
......
......

Lies dir einmal folgenden Forumsbeitrag durch, das Tagging musst dann du entscheiden, der die Örtlichkeit kennt.
Wenn der Weg wieder frei ist, einfach das "disused" entfernen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56426

Ich werde die betroffenen, gelöschten Wege wieder herstellen, du solltest dann die richtigen tags anbringen.
Ich werde hier eine Liste posten.

Bei Fragen melden, hier, per Mail, oder im Forum, die beißen nicht.

Gruß
surveyor54
projekttm (2017-11-18 22:06:57+00:00): Guten Abend,

das "Ich werde die betroffenen, gelöschten Wege wieder herstellen" begreife ich nicht. Die Änderungen, die ich vorgenommen habe, beschreiben den Ist Zustand. Warum dann einen Pfad herstellen den es gar nicht mehr gibt ? 

Gruß projekt
surveyor54 (2017-11-18 22:10:37+00:00): Und wenn er wieder frei geräumt ist?
Ich habe das so verstanden, dass er nur z. Zt nicht begehbar ist.
projekttm (2017-11-18 22:35:34+00:00): Wie schon oben geschrieben, wenn ein verblockter Trampelpfad wieder frei wäre, hätte ich es in der Karte eingepflegt.
Constable (2017-11-19 16:29:28+00:00): ciao, tieni conto però che così come hai fatto non va bene, perché hai creato una linea senza indicare il tipo di elemento che stavi mappando. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/541489889
Tra le altre cose la linea da te aggiunta risulta sovrapposta a strade già presenti sulla mappa, quindi anche se le avessi dato le corrette etichette e la avessi indicata come strada, non sarebbe andato bene comunque, perché sarebbero risultate due strade sovrapposte. Rimuovo la linea che hai aggiunto.
I tratti di strada per raggiungere l'agriturismo sembrano già ben mappati, cosa volevi aggiungere?
Constable (2017-11-19 16:33:32+00:00): l'etichetta addr:housenumber serve a indicare il numero civico, non la ragione sociale, snc non è un valore significativo. Inoltre, il nome della strada non deve essere in maiuscolo, quello dell'attività dipende dal vero nome della stessa. va corretto
mavl (2018-12-25 21:22:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:52:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:18:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
majid1359 (2017-11-18 10:22:47+00:00): تغییرات  امروز در نقشه اپدیت فردا maps.me  اضافه شود
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-18 10:28:19+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 53178832, 53178936, 53178991, 53179071, 53179219, 53253701, 53253773, 53254287, 53295049, 53865494, 53865594.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-22 20:34:38+00:00): self-reminder: todo 53866108
Hjart (2017-11-18 11:59:51+00:00): Hvor har du dette fra? Der er intet i de source du har angivet der antyder at der skulle være nogen ændringer her.
Jørn-osm (2017-11-18 16:04:27+00:00): Mit gæt er "danmarksadresser.dk" under "Seneste nye vejnavne" for Vejen Kommune.
http://dkadr.temakort.dk/service/webapi/attachmentdata/?listId=2&detailId=11992&attachmentId=32272
Hjart (2017-11-18 17:25:41+00:00): Ok, men det bør ikke være nødvendigt konstant at skulle gætte sig til hvad han tegner efter. Det er ikke i længden realistisk at følge med på den måde og derfor bør han specielt i tilfælde som dette, angive tydelig og præcis kilde.
user_5359 (2017-11-18 14:16:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your key healthcare:speciality because teh values aren’t defined as site-related (.. Drug_Rehab_Salt_Lake_City ..). For better description please https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility .
eggie (2017-11-18 12:10:28+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-18 12:15:53+00:00): Je hebt nu een adres erbij gemaakt. Ik heb het weer verwijderd en nr 24 dat in het hoopje adresnodes lag verplaatst naar jouw "plek". 
In principe geen adressen aanmaken svp. Ze zijn al aanwezig.
Arthur Rump (2017-11-18 12:29:48+00:00): Bedankt eggie! Ik kon het adres niet vinden, hoe kan ik dat een volgende keer aanpakken?
eggie (2017-11-18 12:43:49+00:00): Je gebruikt standaard editor iD. Die vind ik zelf lastig.. In editor potlatch2 (kun je ook kiezen)  is het makkelijk zoeken naar de nodes en een beetje schuiven. 
Ook kun je de juiste adresnode vinden door een zoekslag in te typen(het adres)  linksboven. Dan kom je op de juiste plek, maar dan moet je nog grabbelen in dat hoopje adressen. 
De adresnodes komen direct van de BAG en worden niet altijd nauwkeurig geplaatst.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=hortensiaweg%2024&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=1730010000013828&objectId=1730200000012912&geometry.x=233518.84740052&geometry.y=573405.6915982&zoomlevel=7
Je kunt de adresnode evt goedleggen volgens je lokale kennis. De BAG klopt nog steeds niet kennelijk.
Arthur Rump (2017-11-18 12:48:09+00:00): Oké, bedankt!
Commodoortje (2017-11-18 17:24:19+00:00): Aangezien in dit complex 25 adresnodes aangwezig zijn, zullen deze niet allemaal gevisualiseerd worden in openstreetmap.org
De oplossing om te zien of het adres bestaat is door te zoeken in het zoekvenster links boven (is in onderstaande link ingevuld)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=24%20Hortensiaweg%20Paterswolde#map=19/53.14137/6.56029&layers=N
feket (2019-03-06 12:34:00+00:00): There is no sign of any apartment here.
Do you have more info on it?
literan (2017-11-18 11:56:12+00:00): Здравствуйте! для дворовых проездов следует применять тег highway=service+living_street=yes. Также вы некорректно ставите адреску (например, здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/55.79641/37.96341 ) - перед с3 (строение 3) нужен пробел. Ссылки с правилами: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr Здесь я все поправлю.
iglubokiy (2017-11-18 13:26:52+00:00): literan, спасибо. Преимущественно пользуюсь оригинальной (англоязычной) документацией, не знал что в русскоязычной wiki уточнены локальные особенности. Учту в следующих правках.
user_5359 (2017-11-18 14:10:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards.
rnewmark (2017-11-18 12:11:29+00:00): I've only deleted one small section I see. I will delete the rest of the route at a later time, assuming no-one objects (I'm just new to this editing!)
Chris Fleming (2017-11-19 12:14:47+00:00): HI Mark, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for preceding with caution. I've had a look at this. Doing a google for this showed up: http://www.transitionblackisle.org/userfiles/file/million%20miles/community_cycle_links/150305-ccl-route-10.pdf

So I think this *is* an official cycle route. My feeling would be to make sure that the surface of the various parts of the route are properly recorded, and hopefully that will make the routers less likely to send you down it?
rnewmark (2017-11-19 17:32:26+00:00): Thanks Chris. I tend to consider official cycle routes as something with signs, and proper cycle paths - not as a communities aspiration that a footpath becomes a route for bicycles (otherwise every footpath might be regarded as a cycle route!).
But I'll do exactly as you suggest and change the surface, and hope the routing software is clever enough not to use it (although I suspect https://www.cyclestreets.net isn't that clever and will just see 'cycle route - must use it'). Regards, Richard
Chris Fleming (2017-11-19 22:07:39+00:00): Sounds like a plan, it looks like cycle.travel avoids this route, but as you say both the balanced and quiet route in cyclestreets use some of these tracks.  As well as making sure the surface is correctly tagged, I think it would make sense to remove the lcn from the relation as well.
demon_box (2017-11-18 17:02:35+00:00): ciao, la questione del Monte Porno o Pornio l'ho discussa già tempo fa con uno storico locale (di Nave) e si è giunti alla conclusione che nonostante suoni strano Monte Pornio è la storpiatura dei cartografi più recenti del nome originale Monte Porno e non viceversa. riporto testualmente le sue parole: "Monte Pornio è una invenzione di Bernardo Parecchini del CAI di una ventina di anni fa. Monte Porno è segnato all'IGM 1: 25000 ancora dal dopoguerra."
procedo alla correzione, grazie, ciao.
SebaC (2017-11-18 17:16:40+00:00): Ok, sono decisamente meno informato, solo ci sono stato ieri e su parecchi cartelli c'era la "i". Grazie della correzione, alla prossima!
dgitto (2017-11-21 06:26:06+00:00): Quindi un alt_name non farebbe male, visto che esiste segnaletica
demon_box (2017-11-21 07:03:13+00:00): Certo potrebbe anche starci e magari lo aggiungo davvero ma ricordiamoci che siamo in presenza di un puro nome di fantasia nato ed esistente soltanto sulle mappe più recenti. Ma forse in effetti normalmente nessuno di noi quando tagga un alt_name o anche un loc_name si preoccupa o ha possibilità di indagare in profondità sull'etimologia del nome alternativo o locale.
Grazie ciao
dgitto (2017-11-21 08:20:55+00:00): Sì io sono d'accordo con te. È che molti mappatori danno abbastanza peso alle targhe e segnaletica (spero ufficiale) presente nella realtà
pitscheplatsch (2017-11-18 15:30:47+00:00): Hi Странник, starting with this changeset, you created more than 1,200 changesets within 12 minutes. I guess all changesets have the same content. I think something is wrong here. Could you please describe your map edit? Thanks.
Странник (2017-11-18 16:28:46+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch! Yes, this may not be true. It seems that Vespucci is behaving inappropriately. But I don't know how to deal with it. Can you help me?
Thanks.
SimonPoole (2017-11-18 19:59:52+00:00): @Странник while the underlying reason for the issue is not clear, i've added some protection against what is likely happening (with some debug information so that we may be able to find the root cause). It has as far as we know, only happen twice up to now, so it must be fairly special circumstances.
SimonPoole (2017-11-21 00:32:36+00:00): @Странник the new version should be available from f-droid as soon as they've build it.
tonyf1 (2017-11-18 22:27:32+00:00): ¿Hay un camping aquí? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:tourism%3Dcamp_site
Is there a campground here? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Atourism%3Dcamp_site
tonyf1 (2017-11-21 05:22:32+00:00):  Sin respuesta. Eliminado. 
No reply. Deleted.Changeset #53966431
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-18 12:35:27+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 53884303, 53884320, 53884336, 53884366, 53884540, 53884840.
mapper999 (2018-06-22 20:59:15+00:00): Hi,
what is the point of the LF10-kopie? The name and ref e.g. appears on OSM-based cycling maps which is a bit confusing.