piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kapazao (2022-08-12 08:22:07+00:00): Buenas, supongo que has revisado el hilo y has visto los comentarios de los que participaron.
A parte en el grupo de Telegram de OpenStreetMap España (https://telegram.me/OSMes) se comentó también y es verdad que he visto que algunos comentarios no se registraron en el hilo, lo cual habría estado bien. En el grupo se dió el visto bueno y desde entonces no ha habido problema alguno.

Para continuar el hilo tendrías que enviar un email en respuesta al mensaje del hilo a talk-es@openstreetmap.org con el asunto "Corregir Metro de Granada". Ahí ya indicas los motivos por los que quieres cambiarlo y comentas lo dicho por aquí y lo que veas necesario.

Yo ya te digo que no tengo problema en cambiarlo siempre y cuando se haga en acuerdo con los demás y de la forma correcta, para que no tengamos luego problemas con otra gente que crea que es otro tipo de transporte, así lo tenemos todo registrado.

Un saludo
Famlam (2022-08-11 10:29:55+00:00): @Chap_oga, please contact your colleague Courtney directly and stop these vandalizing edits, as was promised by Courtney that these invalid edits would stop.

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=869339#p869339

I assume you take care of the repairs yourself?

Just to be sure: a residential road cannot be connected to footways on both sides. Cars don't get picked up by helicopters to get to the road network (usually). Also make sure you get familiar with the local area: classification of roads is also based on much more than i.e. satellite imagery.
Chap_oga (2022-08-18 13:12:41+00:00): Hi Famlam,

As discussed in the Dutch forum, this edit and other edits revert previous edits I made following community feedback. In the future, I will make sure my changeset descriptions clearly indicate this to avoid confusion. And, thank you for all your feedback since it is helping us further improve our edits.
user_5359 (2022-08-18 07:03:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of you booth tags. Please notice we use (British) English for description. Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org for details.
eggie (2022-08-11 11:04:39+00:00): Hi Chap... What's the trigger this can't be a path..  ?
Greetz,
eggie
Chap_oga (2022-08-18 13:14:27+00:00): Hey eggie,

As mentioned in the Netherlands forum, I made this edit and other edits to revert previous edits I made following community feedback. I will provide clearer changeset descriptions in the future. Furthermore, we have been working hard at analyzing these cases in order to improve our editing practices. Your feedback is helping us get better, so thank you again.
Chap_oga (2022-08-18 13:15:00+00:00): Hi eggie,

As discussed in the Dutch user forum, this edit and others reverted previous edits I made following community feedback. In the future, I will make sure my changeset descriptions clearly indicate this to avoid confusion. And, a lot of time has been spent analyzing these cases so we can improve our edits in the future. Your input is helping us, so thank you for that.
eggie (2022-08-11 11:07:28+00:00): Hi Chap

What makes you think this must be a track?

Greetz,
eggie
Chap_oga (2022-08-18 13:13:52+00:00): Hi eggie,

Like Courtney mentioned in the Dutch forum, this edit and others are reverts of previous edits I made based on community feedback. I will make sure to provide better changeset descriptions in the future. And thanks for all your feedback which is helping us analyze these cases and get better at improving the map.
eggie (2022-08-18 14:16:36+00:00): I know.
Thanks for reply
eggie
user_5359 (2022-08-18 07:04:55+00:00): Welcome again! Same problem like your first change set.
PVitt (2022-08-11 15:32:59+00:00): Hi Jan,

Danke für die schnelle Korrektur. Allerdings ist an der neuen Position auch kein Schulgebäude, sondern überdachter Schulhof.
Wenn dir die Position des Defis nicht genau bekannt ist, ergänze den Knoten doch einfach mit einem fixme-Tag, damit er von Ortskundigen korrigiert werden kann.

Davon ab: Danke für's Eintragen der Defis :)
JanW_ (2022-08-12 06:08:28+00:00): Hi PVitt,
danke für den hinweis. Habe den Defi nun um ein fixme ergänzt.
Genau deshalb machen wir dieses openStreetMap-projekt auch, damit wir von Ortskundigen Unterstützung bekommen.
Weitere hinweise und verbesserungsvorschläge kannst Du mir jederzeit gerne zukommen lassen.
Jillis inactivE (2022-08-11 06:36:42+00:00): Hoi, bij nr 117 staat addr:street=Rading nog op het gebouw.
eggie (2022-08-11 07:00:12+00:00): 'k Wordt slecht in multitasking..
eggie (2022-08-11 07:02:58+00:00): 'k Heb het idee dat leisure=horse_riding met sport= equestrian niet rendert op de standaard kaart.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-08-11 07:07:43+00:00): Dat sport =horse_racing heb ik aangepast naar equestrian. 
track heb ik aangepast naar pitch..
eggie (2022-08-11 07:09:59+00:00): Dat atelier gate51 .. en wat ik zo tegenkom ook als van gebouwen verwijderd.

Een reactie heb ik nooit gekregen.
Mapper gaat dat echt niet aanpassen.
alexashh (2022-08-12 21:09:32+00:00): Благодарю за подробные и понятные комментарии к правкам. Спасибо!
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
Jillis inactivE (2022-08-11 06:31:37+00:00): Hoi, office=company staat nog op het gebouw.
eggie (2022-08-11 06:58:22+00:00): er af :)
impiaaa (2022-08-11 15:01:00+00:00): Please use more descriptive changeset messages. "Tagging" could mean anything. "Update outdated tags" or "Added trees" might be better.
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:19+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
Langlaeufer (2022-08-11 20:01:10+00:00): crossing=traffic_signals für Fußgänger- und Radfahrerübergänge mit Ampel
highway=traffic_signals für beampelte Autokreuzungen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124758309
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
Langlaeufer (2022-08-11 20:00:52+00:00): crossing=traffic_signals für Fußgänger- und Radfahrerübergänge mit Ampel
highway=traffic_signals für beampelte Autokreuzungen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124758523
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
tg4567 (2022-08-15 08:14:17+00:00): wikimedia_commons linki de varmış, eklerseniz OsmAnd'da resimler çıkar: Category:Bebek Mosque
turankaya74 (2022-08-15 08:33:50+00:00): Nasıl ekleniyor ?
tg4567 (2022-08-15 12:28:32+00:00): burada ekledim: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124915748

tag bilgisi burada: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons
aleno150 (2022-08-11 07:51:37+00:00): @archie Varför tar du bara bort ändringar utan diskussion? Nu visas enbart färjeläget för bilfärjan som går någon enstaka gång i veckan. Däremot MS Burö som avgår flera gånger per dag avgår från piren bredvid.
archie (2022-08-11 16:23:59+00:00): Det är inte en bilfärja utan "sopfärjan" som transporterar sopor och andra skrymmande saker. Du saknar tydligen grundläggande lokalkännedom inom området. Döper om vägar till fel namn efter ditt eget tyckande osv.
aleno150 (2022-08-11 17:09:17+00:00): Alltså jag förstår inte... det räcker med att du kikar på Bing kartan i OSM redigeraren så ser du ms Polstjärnan och ms Burö att de ligger vid olika pirer. Björköleden markerade jag de filer som man hänvisas till när man kommer med bil till Lilla Varholmen. Den återställningen kan jag köpa. Men snälla, vi har uppenbarligen intresse för samma områden, jag ser gärna att du modifierar, tillför och även ifrågasätter men nästa gång kan jag be dig att vara lite restriktiv med att deleta och återställa allt man tillför direkt?
archie (2022-08-11 17:21:48+00:00): Du bör nog sätta in dig lite mera i hur det ser ut, inte hur du gärna vill ha det till. Och låt bli att kopiera från Google maps.
archie (2022-08-11 17:23:41+00:00): Nu har jag redigerat Öckerö färjeläge. Innan du tillför eller ändrar något så bör du vara lite mera noggrann med dina redigeringar än du varit hittills.
aleno150 (2022-08-12 06:03:02+00:00): Öckerö färjeläge blev jättebra redigerat. Jag har en ödmjuk vädjan att istället för att hacka ner på mig se det som ett samarbete att jag påvisade att färjeläget saknade information och du slutförde det. Återigen vi har intresse över samma områden, båda kommer tillföra mer information och då kan vi väll även hålla diskussionen med en god ton?
archie (2022-08-12 06:25:15+00:00): Du har inte förstått osm om du har fått för dig att dina editeringar inte får röras.
maestro_alubia (2023-03-28 08:29:41+00:00): Hallo, du hast hier den Radweg an der Hans-Böckler-Straße entfernt.

Hier gibt es aber definitiv einen Radweg ohne Benutzungspflicht. Erkennbar hier insbesondere an den Radfurten und der klaren Trennung vom Gehweg-Teil des Bürgersteigs. (Vgl. auch https://www.adfc-diepholz.de/radwege-ohne-benutzungspflicht/ und https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=49.975842496638&lng=8.2398199359577&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=3547277382044038&x=0.4924016411672133&y=0.5333533090919695&zoom=0)

Dieser wird gemäß Konvention weiterhin mit bicycle=designated gekennzeichnet, siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren

Die fehlende Benutzungsfplicht kann durch die Definition von "traffic_sign=none" gekennzeichnet werden.

Neuerdings gibt es  für bicycle auch den Wert "optional_sidepath", der das ausweisen kann. Das ist aber noch nicht sonderlich gut unterstützt. Daher würde ich empfehlen das erst mal nicht zu verwenden und später halb-automatisiert zu ersetzen.
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
archie (2022-08-11 06:51:40+00:00): Även om helt planen är en grusplan så är inte hela området en parkeringsplats. Jag är hemma i trakterna!
aleno150 (2022-08-11 07:35:06+00:00): Sant, det är en stor gårdsplan där man får ställa bilen fritt på området. Kanske finns bättre taggar?
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:17+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:14+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:12+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:10+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:15:07+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
archie (2022-08-11 16:48:35+00:00): Ändra inte namn på vägarna efter ditt tycke. Björköleden resp Hönöleden är officiella namn på Vägverkets färjeförbindelser till resp ö. Vägen till färjeläget heter officiellt Hjuviksvägen och kallas ofta för Öckeröleden (det skyltas t o m numera med detta, dock oofficiella, vägnamn). Det finns ingen anledning för dig att döpa om vägar som redan har rätt namn bara därför att Google maps har dessa namn på vägbiten.
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
Andre68 (2022-08-11 15:58:05+00:00): Overlapping coastlines is not valid! 
Coastline checkers (like mine) will detect it.
Since I cannot see the construction area on any imagery service (even not on Maxar Premium!) I cannot fix it.
So, it most likely is up to you to fix it...

(If not fixed) You will see the error tomorrow at noon UTC here:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=coastline&lon=15.21785&lat=43.10634&zoom=3&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=coastline%2Ccoastline_error_lines%2Cline_not_a_ring%2Cline_overlap%2Cline_invalid%2Cline_direction%2Cquestionable%2Ccoastline_error_points%2Cunconnected%2Cintersections%2Cnot_a_ring%2Cdouble_node%2Ctagged_node
EdLoach (2022-08-15 13:45:33+00:00): It does show it. Firstly because the way direction is wrong (I haven't reversed it, but couldn't even find how to in iD) and secondly because two coastlines are overlapping. I would say either remove the natural=coastline tag (effectively reverting to v1 of the way), or make the coastline go around the outside of the new area rather than having two overlapping ways at the join.
Andre68 (2022-08-15 21:30:41+00:00): No, the direction of the way is correct (Land is on left hand side)!
I would currently not remove the coastline tag, because it "might" be correct... Problem is, that it is not visible on aerial images right now!
Thus, I think that only a local can solve this problem...
If the (initial) editor/mapper does not react on this discussion, than it "might" also be legal to remove the coastline tag on the new area, but currently I would prefer to not do this!
It seams, that coastline update process is broken anyway currently... See
https://osmdata.openstreetmap.de/data/coastlines.html
Andre68 (2022-08-15 21:35:26+00:00): Revision...
Corrected way direction...
EdLoach (2022-08-16 09:08:16+00:00): I think the update process is broken because of this issue making the coastlines invalid (and perhaps a different issue before this one).
EdLoach (2022-08-18 13:56:46+00:00): This news article from July seems to have a photo of what is planned. https://tw.news.yahoo.com/金門料羅港區北碼頭區圍堤造地工程動土-2-圖-071011032.html
Andre68 (2022-09-02 07:27:24+00:00): It seems, that there is in fact a construction area and thus I've now fixed this. Hope, it is okay...
Very sad, that the original author did not react...
Langlaeufer (2022-08-11 19:59:58+00:00): crossing=traffic_signals für Fußgänger- und Radfahrerübergänge mit Ampel
highway=traffic_signals für beampelte Autokreuzungen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124761998
user_2066394 (2022-08-11 15:21:57+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-08-24 20:57:54+00:00): لماذا قمت بحذف النقطة التي تمثل القرية؟
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-08-24 21:28:41+00:00): هذه النقطة تمثل نقطة العدوة وكانت بدون اسم وتم استرجاعها:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7730447073
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
habi (2022-08-11 08:00:13+00:00): Closes https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3306281, not 330281!
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
segubi (2023-11-06 22:01:52+00:00): Wo gehen dann die Radrouten entlang? Auf Google-Streetview, das allerdings aus urheberrechtlichen Gründen nicht als Quelle herangezogen werden kann, finden sich hier 9/22 KEINE Einbahnstraßenschilder (1 Monat NACH dem Changeset). Wenn möglich noch einmal überprüfen. Oneway setzt voraus, dass tatsächlich Verbotsschilder vorliegen. Ansonsten müßte die Routenführung der hier verlaufenden Fahrradrouten auch noch angepaßt werden. (ggf. bei Fahrradfreigabe: oneway:bicycle=no). (Gleichzeitig als Note gesetzt, falls jemand mehr in der Nähe sein sollte...)
pjotr (2023-11-09 20:08:16+00:00): Hi, ist fehlerhaft getaggt worden und nun korrigiert. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis!
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
Tomas Straupis (2022-08-11 16:16:38+00:00): Laba diena. Trinti nereikia, kol kelias remontuojamas, užtenka pakeisti į highway=construction.
aixbrick (2022-08-11 12:52:44+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM,
bitte in solchen Fällen am Besten ein https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix verwenden ("disused:shop"). Das erhält die Objekthistorie, falls wieder ein neues Geschäft eröffnet. Das ist hier aber wohl eher nicht der Fall.
Gruß
somix (2022-08-11 08:40:28+00:00): Здравствуйте, корпус 438 - не улица. Не надо дублировать адрес на части здания
Dodko (2022-08-11 11:10:06+00:00): Penzión už existoval označený na budove
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93945672
stačí len aktualizovať email, telefón, wifi a ten duplictný čo ste pridali ako bod môžete vymazať
Teshuvah (2022-08-11 12:27:57+00:00): V 93945672 som zmenil nazov "Saris" na "Hotel Saris". Hotel Saris momentalne posobi ako nezikova organizacia, ktora spravuje budovu byvaleho Hotela Saris. V tej budove sa nachadza Penzion Saris, firmy a taktiez sukromny vlastnici bytov (resp. nebytovych priestorov) v ktorych byvaju. Povodny bod oznacoval celu plochu Hotela Saris. Avsak Penzion Saris, ktory sa nachadza na 7. poschodi je len sucastou budovy Hotela Saris. Dufam, ze to bude teraz zrozumitelnejsie.
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
osmuser63783 (2024-01-20 09:30:06+00:00): Hi thanks for adding https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1018683647. Do you think it's sufficiently accurate that the following notes should be closed?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2998613
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2998618

And possibly
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2996034

There's more notes in the area that are older than recent surveys.
Casey_boy (2024-01-20 15:24:17+00:00): I think those notes can be closed. The mapped route follows the council's PRoW data and is showing up in Strava Heatmap as being used.
osmuser63783 (2024-01-20 15:43:36+00:00): Thanks for confirming!
RaccoonFederation (2024-01-22 09:20:55+00:00): I'd rather these notes aren't closed since they haven't been surveyed on the ground. It can really ruin a hike if you have to walk an extra 5 miles because a path that is shown on the map doesn't exist. One of those paths goes through a hedge where there is no gap in the hedge from satellite imagery.
Casey_boy (2024-01-22 10:59:15+00:00): I 100% agree a ground survey is absolutely the best option. But these routes are showing up in Strava Heatmap so it does look like somebody is using them (though admittedly, with some deviations in this instance). I would also say gaps in hedges often won't show up in aerial imagery (especially for simple, small stiles) so I wouldn't be overly concerned by that. Having said that, I also don't see any harm in keeping the notes open either.
osmuser63783 (2024-01-24 12:38:16+00:00): I've reopened them!
GinaroZ (2022-08-11 11:16:09+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/827503886 signed as a cycle path?
f8aj3k (2022-09-22 20:43:35+00:00): No, the towpath isn't designated specifically for (only) cycling. I've therefore updated it to the generic path type which is "either multi-use or unspecified usage, open to all non-motorized vehicles". Even if this isn't 100% accurate, it's more accurate than the cycleway type.
f8aj3k (2022-09-22 20:49:45+00:00): Apologies, just realised the question related to Ashley Rd rather than the towpath. I can't help with that, but will keep my edit to towpath as "path" is more appropriate there than "cycleway".