piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
^___^ (2018-05-29 13:47:30+00:00): Ah, I see. If I may speak my mind, I would like to suggest that descriptions contain substance, that is, they actually describe what was done. "Fix" doesn't explain what was fixed, a better description would be for example "Correct spelling of attribute X to Y" or something (I'm not familiar enough with OSM to make a better example yet). Similar to version control/commit messages in source code - short and concise descriptions of the change that was made. Thanks!
Hjart (2018-05-29 14:05:11+00:00): You're correct. I often try to describe my changesets as accurately as possible, but then again for many years had a habit of editing/correcting everything I found in massive areas, making it hard to describe it accurately at all. I could have described this changeset better though. We do have tools though which helps visualize what happened in changesets though: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59334740. You could also try https://osmcha.mapbox.com/
^___^ (2018-05-29 14:18:19+00:00): Thanks Hjart, good to know about those links. Side question; I'd like to be able to find this conversation again in the future, but I'm not seeing these comments I'm making here anywhere in my profile page. Is there a way to find the comments you've made to other than your own changesets anywhere in OSM?
Hjart (2018-05-29 14:25:38+00:00): In my profile page you'll find a link to https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Hjart which lists a bunch of statistics etc. In that page you'll find a link to all my changeset comments. Just insert your own name to see your statistics etc.
mueschel (2018-05-28 11:10:45+00:00): Hi,,
you added the tag "residential_details=no" on many objects - could you explain what this is supposed to mean? This tag is not used anywhere else and is not documented.

Jan
lusdavo (2018-05-28 14:38:46+00:00): Thanks @mueschel, this has been rectified.

David.
Supaplex (2018-05-28 10:07:05+00:00): 你好，請別破壞台灣的圖資。開放街圖要依據在地實際觀察結果編輯，而不是特定意識形態。你將被提報Data Working Group。 
Please don't vandalism Taiwan data. OpenStreetMap editing is based on the ground observation, not certain ideology. You will be reported to the Data Working Group.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59334956
Littlebtc (2021-09-03 14:48:46+00:00): :(
archie (2018-05-28 14:00:31+00:00): highway=footway + foot=yes. Tycker du inte foot=yes är överflödig. Vem annars än fotgängare skall få använda highway=footway. Läs igenem hjälpsidorna under sökord "implicit default values"
archie (2018-05-28 14:24:02+00:00): Du bör samla dina taggningar och sedan ladda upp dem allihopa. Inte så som du har gjort; varje byggnad för sig. Detta stressar servrarna.
user_5359 (2018-05-28 17:59:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.Dear CreditRepair Team! Your SEO specialist does not work very well with OSM. Again and again he tries to attract attention by renaming street names. He only succeeds in doing so on the map at short intervals. This makes my personal annoyance about a company that uses service providers all the longer. In your own interest, I can only recommend that you stop working with me.
Mike Baggaley (2018-06-21 12:17:46+00:00): Hi I see you have set access=designated on ways 591563477 and 591563483. This is an invalid value - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=designated . Did you mean foot=designated? Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
Russ McD (2018-06-22 07:22:01+00:00): Mike,
Noted and tags removed, along with a few other ways similarly tagged.
However, this mistake is easily made by users of Potlatch2 as the "access=designated" tag is offered as a choice on the drop down.  Unless you had read the Wiki first, you would have no idea it was incorrect.
Perhaps if you have some influence in the UK OSM community, you could help by getting it removed. 
Best rgds, Russ.
pesec (2018-05-29 05:20:33+00:00): Просьба разделять такого рода правки по населенным пунктам, т.к. у вас в итоге зона правки на пол России.
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2018-05-28 10:45:26+00:00): Hei. Jeg har fikset taggingen for dere sånn at adressen nå er tagget riktig. dere kan også legge til website- og phone-tagger.
Supaplex (2019-02-07 16:37:30+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Reza_koulivand (2018-05-28 12:57:09+00:00): سلام، چرا تگ نام انگلیسی رو به فارسی تبدیل میکنی؟
مثال : حافظ جنوبی
iriman (2018-05-31 10:34:17+00:00): سلام. آقای کولیوند درست میگن.
من اول فکر کردم تازه نام‌گذاری کردید اما الآن متوجه شدم در خیلی موارد تگها را تغییر دادین.
درست اینه که در محدودهٔ ایران از تگ 
name
برای نام فارسی استفاده کنیم
و از تگ 
name:en
برای نام انگلیسی.
در سایر کشورها که بخواهیم نام فارسی یک عارضه را بنویسیم از تگ
name:fa
استفاده می‌کنیم.
لطفا اگر دلیلی داره کارتون بفرمایید شاید مشکل از جای دیگری باشه و بتونیم حل کنیم.
Reza_koulivand (2018-05-31 11:11:32+00:00): سلام،آقا افشین کل اسامی معابر رو تو بروجرد، به سبک خودشون دارن تغییر میدن و صندق پیاما روهم چک نمیکنن که متوجه بشن، باید جوری دیگه بهشون اطلاع رسانی بشه
abakus_uploader (2018-05-28 22:30:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Geofreund1 (2019-05-24 20:23:09+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
bei der Abarbeitung von Adressdubletten bin ich auf die Adressen Maximilian-Kottmann-Platz gestoßen, die du eingetragen hast. Leider sind da Adressen wohl nicht nur doppelt sondern auch falsch eingetragen. Bitte mal prüfen.
PT-53 (2019-05-25 06:38:01+00:00): Erledigt
sewilkens (2018-05-28 11:08:21+00:00): Tevens source: PDOK aerial imagery Beeldmateriaal.nl 25cm
TianLan (2018-11-13 03:36:25+00:00): Hi mueschel, please have a look at your contribution of 惠宇文化願景. The building is overlapping the road. 
There is a helpful page regarding roof modeling. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roof_modelling Maybe it is of interest to you.
Happy mapping
mueschel (2018-11-13 07:46:26+00:00): Hi,
I didn't add the building, I just fixed the spelling of the address keys.
TianLan (2018-11-13 18:26:32+00:00): Oh I 
see and sorry. I didn't read the history, thus I was assuming it was you. Happy mapping.
trigpoint (2018-11-06 12:59:20+00:00): Hi, is it really not possible to walk or cycle between Lubbesthorpe Bridle Road and Tweed Street? The bollard suggests that only motor vehicles are prohibited and there shoudl be a short section footway or cycleway to provide connectivity?
Cheers Phil
John Pitkethly (2018-11-06 14:59:37+00:00): You are quite right. The ways were separated only by bollards, and I've added a footpath between them in new changeset 64232985. Thank you for pointing this out.
trigpoint (2018-11-06 18:48:50+00:00): Thank you for fixing this.
Cheers Phil
eggie (2018-05-28 11:31:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Waarom hier een adresnode geplaatst midden op de rijbaan? Wat is je bedoeling hiermee?
eggie (2018-05-28 11:34:54+00:00): De adresnode heb ik verwijderd van de rijbaan. Svp niet zelf adressen aanmaken in OSM.. Die zijn al aanwezig op de gebouwen.
Reza_koulivand (2019-01-04 07:47:46+00:00): مرز دهستانه نه رود خانه .لطفا بیشتر دقت کنید.
eggie (2018-05-28 11:41:16+00:00): Dag MapAssistent. De achtergrond van BING ligt behoorlijk verschoven. Je kunt beter de PDOK luchtfoto als achtergrond kiezen. 
Bing background is not correct at the moment. Better use the PDOK areal photo.
sbegueria (2018-05-28 11:56:55+00:00): This is my first route, and I will like some feedback about my edits before they are consolidated in the map.
Reclus (2018-05-28 12:09:26+00:00): Danke!
freeExec (2018-05-29 14:35:18+00:00): Разве это дорогу использует сельхозтехника, раз вы её track обозначили? Я здесь вижу подъезд к площадкам, а это service.
frosm (2019-05-23 21:00:44+00:00): bonjour,
qu'est-ce que c'est https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591573175 ?
jebins (2019-07-16 19:12:22+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est un emplacement sur lequel il est possible de bivouaquer.
Leo Slager (2018-05-28 18:26:15+00:00): Dat heb je goed gezien.
Luuuddooo (2018-05-29 21:39:36+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai restauré cette route car je pensais que vous l'aviez effacée par erreur: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82012299/history
Baghdad Marine Equipment (2018-05-28 12:19:56+00:00): بغداد للمعدات البحرية
tanonin (2023-11-15 19:14:32+00:00): Thanks captain obvious 😅
waldhans (2018-06-01 21:38:50+00:00): bitte die Adressen nicht verdoppeln!
waldhans (2018-06-01 21:37:45+00:00): bitte die Adressen nicht verdoppeln!
freeExec (2018-05-29 14:31:50+00:00): Сама колонка обозначается как man_made=water_trap
user_389895 (2018-06-04 16:09:18+00:00): Мне не трудно исправить это для своих правок и ближайших ко мне объектов, а что делать со всеми остальными объектами по городу? Воможна ли автоматическая массовая правка (вроде патрулирования в Википедии)?
freeExec (2018-06-04 16:13:53+00:00): Не нужно никаких автоматических правок, потому что не всегда ясно что хотели отметить. Исправлять только там, где точно известно.
waldhans (2018-06-01 21:36:44+00:00): bitte die Adressen nicht verdoppeln!
praeteritum (2023-01-12 04:30:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131169244.
praeteritum (2023-01-12 04:28:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 131169215.
Omegatherion (2018-09-01 14:42:35+00:00): Hi, wie kommst du darauf, dass die Strecken hw=tertiary sind?
MrWebber (2018-09-05 16:35:26+00:00): Hallo,

Für Strasse am Mühlendamm ist auch tertiary und wird bis zur neuen Autobahn Abfahrt verlängert/ umgewidmet.

Grüße MrWebber
Omegatherion (2018-09-05 17:11:54+00:00): Die wird doch nächstes Jahr erst fertig, da kannst du das nicht jetzt schon ändern.
Supaplex (2019-02-07 16:37:06+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Florimondable (2018-10-07 10:58:27+00:00): Bonjour, c'est une erreur sur la vue aérienne il n'y a pas de bande cyclable, juste des pictos vélos.
Cordialement.
Khomille (2018-10-07 12:44:49+00:00): Bonjour,
Je ne sais pas de quel way vous parlez...
Florimondable (2018-10-07 16:07:41+00:00): Boulevard Victor, ou bd du Général Martial Valin.
eggie (2018-05-28 14:04:08+00:00): Dag Iemke Het pontje vaart toch in een soort driehoek via de Zuiderpier? Verder heeft het geen verbinding met de wegen dus het zal niet routeren. Verder zal er seosonal=yes bij moeten. Kijk je er nog even naar?
eggie (2018-05-28 15:47:35+00:00): seasonal=yes bedoel ik uiteraard. Zie dat er nu wel verbindingen zijn.
keithonearth (2018-06-16 20:42:34+00:00): I've deleted the forest tags off these parks, as none of these parks were entirely forested, many already had the forested areas mapped more accurately, and adding the forest tag to the park hid the more accurate forest boundary. I know you are a very experienced mapper, but I think it is better not to add forest tags to park boundaries.
PlaneMad (2018-06-16 20:54:43+00:00): Agree.
keithonearth (2018-06-16 21:41:24+00:00): Thanks bhai. :-)
keithonearth (2018-06-17 00:32:09+00:00): I've realized that without the forest tag the parks stopped rendering at all. While I don't want to tag for the renderer, I do want these parks to render. 

I checked how national parks are tagged in Canada, and found that the `leisure=nature_reserve` tag was on all of them, in addition to the `national_park` tag. It seems an appropriate tag for these parks too, so I've added. Please let me know if you feel it's not good tagging.
PlaneMad (2018-06-18 09:41:00+00:00): Looks good! Btw you should definitely be speaking at SOTM Asia http://bit.ly/sotmasia-cfp
keithonearth (2018-06-21 23:09:02+00:00): That's very flattering, I'm just a amateur though. Are you speaking at it?
IlBano (2019-11-09 17:08:32+00:00): Hi heilbron,

in this changeset way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591609886 was marked with access=no. Since the update dates back to May 2018 and I'm not able to find information about any road closure of that highway I believe it was temporary. What can you tell about this restriction?

Thanks
waldhans (2018-06-01 21:08:32+00:00): Familienzentrum Brigittenheim: man kann sicher etwas eintragen, ohne gleich die ganze Geometrie zu verschieben!
monotar (2021-08-23 12:33:01+00:00): mich würde wirklich interessieren auf welche Grundlage Wäldgen ein village und kein hamlet sein sollen, scheinst du ja bei einigen Dörfern gemacht zu haben?
Leo Slager (2018-05-28 18:16:55+00:00): Aan de hand van de geplaatste verkeersborden op Kerkstraat en Schapenstraat  denk ik dat oneway=yes niet juist is. Toevoegen van hgv:conditional lijkt gewenst.
mueschel (2018-05-30 08:26:23+00:00): Hi,
there are 24 ways here that have very strange tags. Could you have a look and fix this?
For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591616594

Thanks, Jan
Ale_Zena_IT (2018-05-30 08:52:59+00:00): Hi, thanks Jan, I've fixed.
Still remains an ambiguity on a place of worship https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240809743 so I've contacted the user
Tim Couwelier (2018-05-28 14:52:48+00:00): Geachte,

Ik ben het niet met deze changeset eens.
De door mijn intekende (grotere) contour is volgens de werken in uitvoering, uw bijsturing naar de (achterhaalde) luchtfoto is incorrect...
M!dgard (2018-05-28 14:59:17+00:00): Teruggedraaid in https://osm.org/changeset/59343121
b-holdet (2018-05-28 17:30:37+00:00): Hej bocaj52
Da du slettede dem havde du vel set hvad det var?
Jeg kommer i området og ved hvad det er.
Har du en anden metode at markere disse volde?
Med venlig hilsen
Flemming
bocaj52 (2018-05-28 19:56:08+00:00): Hej Flemming, jeg antog at det var en fejl da der ikke var noget på luftfoto og intet gps spor. Jeg har tegnet dem igen. Har desværre ikke noget bud på at markere en vold.
b-holdet (2018-05-29 03:37:11+00:00): Hej bocaj52
Du kan se voldene ganske tydeligt, hvis du bruger terrænkortet med Lidarmålingerne. Voldene blev brugt til at beskytte tankbilerne, der stod på flyvestationen i sin tid. Hvis en gik i brand kunne ilden begrænses. Og så kunne de gemmes af vejen for luftangreb ved at lægge net over.
bocaj52 (2018-05-30 21:06:34+00:00): Spændende med historisk fakta, . Kan man gemme dem under signaturen så det kan læses fra kortet?
eggie (2018-05-28 15:51:06+00:00): highway=road gebruiken we alleen als je niet weet hoe te taggen.. zoiets geeft een foutmelding. De vorige mapper had 'm op footway staan.
Novenx (2018-06-22 07:07:09+00:00): 请问唐港线，即省道S362，含有您所谓的双向一车道路段吗？
其次，是谁规定了车道少的道路就不能作为一个地区的主要道路？建议您查阅以下OSM在主要道路上的详细注解，如果您不懂，我可以为您翻译。
最后，唐港线本身是河北省内具有重要意义的公路通道；我购买的2015年唐山地图上、高德谷歌百度等现行地图网站上也都将其标注为主要道路，S362的作为主要道路的信息至少供上百万人次进行阅览，大家都觉的没有问题。
那么请问，通行在这条道路上的人们，唐山市政府，河北省政府，各大地图商，都将该道路视为主要道路，他们也都是搞笑的吗？搞笑可以用来修建省道吗？有些国道也很窄，车道少，难道就取消作为国家干线道路的他们，改为住宅区公路？同理，省道就是一个地区的主要道路，不然省府不会闲着没事修路玩。
诚然OSM是OSM，不是出版社发行的2015年唐山城市地图，也不是高德地图谷歌地图的照抄版，甚至是绝对不允许照搬谷歌地图的。但他们提供的信息起码具有一定的通用性，是广为被大众接受的。
本来我很早就看到了您的修改，我当时一笑了之，单凭车道分道路等级的话，长安街就得修改为干线道路。我就没有花功夫去解释和修改，而是继续完善唐山市区的信息。昨晚2点时看到您又继续按照您的理论修改他人辛苦做的滦南乐亭一带的道路，甚至将平青乐线省道改作大钊路时，我就忍无可忍了，请您查阅一下河北省的省道信息，查阅一下OSM给出的指南，或是亲自驱车调查一下道路名和车流量，再来修改也不迟。不要按自己想当然就修改，谢谢！
BeKri (2018-05-28 18:06:33+00:00): Und jetzt noch ein
office=company oder
was auch immer ihr seid/ sein wollt
und es wäre perfekt.
ecs_Beratung_und_Service_GmbH (2018-05-29 13:18:41+00:00): erledigt + Beschreibung hinzugefügt. Danke für die Hilfe/ Gruss
The RedBurn (2018-08-13 10:57:56+00:00): Salut Leroux47,

Attention de ne pas confondre asphalt (enrobé) avec sett (pavés taillés) ;)

Bonne continuation !
The RedBurn (2018-08-13 11:04:35+00:00): (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:surface)
belgianGeek (2018-08-13 20:21:07+00:00): Oups, je ferai attention la prochaine fois... Merci !
abakus_uploader (2018-05-28 22:30:42+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Alecs01 (2018-06-03 13:14:18+00:00): Ciao, hai creato sei POI sovrapposti in mezzo alla strada qui: https://osm.org/go/0Chfj5_Fb?m= potresti per favore aggiungerli nella posizione corretta?
Glassman (2018-05-28 23:30:44+00:00): Can you add a name and address to the pizza place?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59343416
luiswoo (2018-05-28 19:53:22+00:00): Зачем нужен мультиполигон\отношение из одного цельного полигона?
dikkeknodel (2018-06-06 07:12:43+00:00): Hi Andree,
By coincidence I noticed you added the rock south of the Uetliberg viewing point. I totally ignored that this was not on the map the many times I passed it, good job! I noticed some improvement possibilities today and made some changes. Let me explain the reasons.
The natural=cliff tag is directional, the left side of the way is the top of the cliff, the right side is the bottom. You applied it the other way around, which comes down to mapping a steep hole in the ground :-). Additionally the cliff way should follow the top of the cliff, not the bottom. 
You also added the area=yes tag, but a cliff is by definition a line, not an area. If you want to map rock area you should use natural=bare_rock 
You added an ele tag, which has two problems. You should follow the syntax, and just add the number in meters, or you should follow the syntax as described https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele. Additionally the elevation of 880 is definitely not correct. The Uetliberg peak is higher than the rock you mapped, and has a verified elevation of 869 m.
Please read the wiki page for more info :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcliff
What I have done: (1) I reversed the cliff's way direction, so the top and bottom are following the definition (and displayed correctly), (2) I moved the way to the top of the cliff, based on the Canton Zürich 2015 imagery, (3) I opened up the cliff way on the north side and added a path to ascent the rock (which is there if I remember correctly), (4) I've made a multipolygon relation for the natural=bare_rock and added the same ways as the inner role of the landuse=forest relation. This creates a gap in the forest rendering and fills it with bare_rock rendering. I see you are rather new to OSM, and understand applying relations is quite hard the first time. If you are interested, you can read more at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon. (5) I've removed the elevation tag and moved the description tag to a new node with tourism=viewpoint tag.
You can find all my changes here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59591294
and visualized here:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=59591294
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers, dikkeknodel
PlaneMad (2018-05-29 06:35:27+00:00): Wow, nice work!
Anton Khorev (2018-06-17 22:46:54+00:00): В этом и предыдущем пакете есть удаление существующих скамеек.
Anton Khorev (2018-06-17 22:56:20+00:00): area:highway тоже зачем-то удалены
Константин Гам (2018-10-26 11:21:28+00:00): Потому что полностью перерисовывался парк, вы комментарий читали? Существующие ныне данные были с привязкой по бингу, а мы перерисовали с сантиметровой ортофото
Anton Khorev (2018-10-27 21:13:13+00:00): Так можно и весть парк удалить, ради повышения точности. Если, например, ни одной точки не оставить, то можно смело сказать, что у всех оставшихся точек точность идеальная.

Сами площади от более точной перерисовки не исчезнут. Казалось бы, должно быть даже наоборот.

Чем могла помешать перерисовке, например, эта скамейка?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5141535738

Она не находилась ни поверх здания, ни в пруду, ни с противоположной стороны дорожки. Теперь её снова добавили:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5871179697

Мешает ли её текущее положение?
DemoLogin (2018-11-08 22:40:16+00:00): Здравствуйте коллеги,
В этой серии правок была потеряна информация о деревьях, тропинках и дорожных покрытиях по результатам осмотра на местности.
Я так понимаю, сейчас в процессе восстановления. Подскажите пожалуйста сроки?
Константин Гам (2019-01-26 14:10:01+00:00): О каких тропинках идёт речь? Парк был полностью с нуля перерисован по свежему аэроснимку, видимо некоторые тропы исчезли.

Деревья имевшиеся на карте были крайне неверны, так как нанесены были до реконструкции парка, когда был ландшаштный редизайн небольшой.

Если у вас есть конкретные замечания на ошибки, пожалуйста поставьте notes, я проверю по снимку, на местности, с сожалению, невозможно до весны...
DemoLogin (2019-04-14 16:30:26+00:00): Нашёл ещё неточность.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47287224#map=18/59.87128/30.33309
Buraddo (2018-06-13 08:24:57+00:00): From news sources and official data, Calea Sighișoarei, Strada Bega and Strada Barajului are all DJ135B, interpolating I marked Dezrobirii and Libertatii too
grouper (2018-07-22 03:55:57+00:00): Fake features.
luiswoo (2018-05-28 19:10:31+00:00): зачем эти мультиполигоны из одного outera?
Adamant1 (2018-05-30 07:20:23+00:00): Hi there. Thanks for editing Openstreetmaps. Just a heads up, it might be good if you added more of a description of what your edit is than blahhh from now on. That way other editors will know what exactly it was you edited. Thanks.
Hjart (2018-05-28 17:08:19+00:00): Genau wo ist das geldautomat (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/-aYf2LNIflrK4lRdUjsvVA) und ist das name wirklich "ATM Euro Cash"?