piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kiss_Karoly (2021-10-01 17:23:08+00:00): Köszönöm a javítást. Eegen ... feltehetően, amikor egy autóbusz útvonalat szedtem össze, akkor sikerült mellényúlnom. Elég otromba hiba. Szerencse, hogy másoltam a 47-est és nem áthelyeztem :)
ottwiz (2021-10-01 17:25:38+00:00): Nincs mit. Remélem legközelebb ilyen hiba nem fog előfordulni :)
elsy1 (2021-10-03 10:02:15+00:00): تبلیغ و خرابکاری نقشه موجب مسدود شدن حساب شما میشود لطفا اصلاح کنید
Carto'Cité (2021-12-12 17:09:25+00:00): Bonjour Aradin,
Je me suis permis de passer le opposite_lane à simple opposite pour cette route https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27935423 car il semblerait que ce soit un simple double sens cyclable et qu'il n'est pas matérialisé par une bande. Dis moi si tu as observé une autre information sur le terrain.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
taketaketake (2021-10-07 00:12:25+00:00): 右折レーンを描画しているようですが、航空写真を見る限り右折専用レーンはソンジしない箇所に設定されているみたいですが現地は違うのですか？
規制設定するために交差点形状を変えるのは止めてください
リレーションにて適切に設定してください
MikeN (2021-10-02 02:02:30+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap!   You're doing a great job adding local features.   The subdivision tagging has evolved in the US.  The most common method is to draw the residential land use outline, then add the name to the outline.   If there is an original GNIS tag, it may be removed.  The place tag is no longer used for subdivisions, as these are not a traditional hamlet.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Princess_Aurora (2021-10-03 11:03:58+00:00): Dear Saif alhattali;
Please be aware that you can't use your name in highway names, and if you can please verify the source for these changes.
Regards,
Princess_Aurora
Princess_Aurora (2021-10-03 11:03:36+00:00): Dear Saif alhattali;
Please be aware that you can't use your name in highway names, and if you can please verify the source for these changes.
Regards,
Princess_Aurora
Princess_Aurora (2021-10-03 11:03:18+00:00): Dear Saif alhattali;
Please be aware that you can't use your name in highway names, and if you can please verify the source for these changes.
Regards,
Princess_Aurora
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-10-01 17:36:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-10-01 19:23:07+00:00): Dag Johan.. Je vraagt feedback.
Het is nu kennelijk een G13 fietspad ipv een algeneen pad. 
De juiste tags staan er al op zie ik. 
----------
bicycle=designated hoort er  juist weer niet op.
Ik zal wat aanpassen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-01 20:49:07+00:00): surface=concrete weer toegevoegd ipv paved.
PPete2 (2021-10-29 08:08:06+00:00): Hallo, herzlich willkommen bei OSM! 
Ich habe deine Änderung von Garsten von village auf town wieder zurückgesetzt, da der Ort im OSM Sinne keine "Stadt" ist. Weder hat es Stadrecht, noch ist es im Dunstkreis von Steyr ein besonderes regionales Zentrum. Auch wenn es manche vielleicht als "Kleinstadt" bezeichnen, was ich aber so für Garsten auch noch nie gehört habe. 

Falls du dazu eine andere Meinung hast, wie auch zu jedem anderen OSM-Thema, bitte diese vorher im Forum diskutieren, danke. Konkret zum Thema Städte in Österreich auf https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=845213
NieWnen (2021-10-02 11:32:38+00:00): Parking przy Lidlu jest płatny? :O Czy pomyłka?
Kovoschiz (2021-10-16 15:09:56+00:00): Please don't add route names to roads. They should be kept separate when there is a street name.
user_11435438 (2021-10-01 14:31:54+00:00): tmd忘记关闭，两个代传的修改集混一块了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111964850
Ser9ei (2021-10-01 16:28:03+00:00): Если даже официально перехода там больше нет, то надо еще смотреть на навигацию. В реальности люди не пойдут в обход до пешеходного перехода. а перейдут проезд тут.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111964993
﴿﴾‎ (2021-10-01 17:30:30+00:00): Why have you done this? I can still see the farmland boundaries removed in https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111965591
SHARCRASH (2021-10-01 17:34:15+00:00): Done what? Please be specific.
SHARCRASH (2021-10-01 17:38:16+00:00): Also, communicate to me with your usual account, with ﴿﴾‎ you have zéro edits... Very weird!
﴿﴾‎ (2021-10-01 18:13:05+00:00): Ist es für den Kern der Sache entscheidend, wieviele Edits ich habe?
Ackerland sollte an Schlagrenzen aufgeteilt werden und das machst du in Luxemburg sicher auch so.
tux67 (2021-10-02 09:20:13+00:00): The way you updated the farmland is not in line with the way boundaries of farmland are mapped in the region. Previous mapping was based on NRW ALKIS Data and latest 2021 DOP.
Please revert to previous stage.
https://www.opengeodata.nrw.de/produkte/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111965591
SHARCRASH (2021-10-02 14:02:21+00:00): Again, please be specific, which element(s) are you talking about? 

As i am not very familiar with the sources available for this region, for this changeset I realigned a global aerial imagery and corrected the offset to the Heatmap (which has thousands of GPS traces) by carefully matching several ways crossing NS and WE. 

Your entire region here is not "perfect", there are elements, whether areas or ways, which are clearly already misaligned compared to your NRW sources. Examples:
- this crossway on a survey_point, which makes me wonder even if the survey-point is correct: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/414904172 You can clearly see that the surrounding farmlands are not positioned correctly, at all. 
- the curve of this road and the perimeter of nearby forest on north side https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/129698556

According my changeset comparison with the previous state, I only did few handful position changes on areas. I mostly corrected overlapping polygons, inner MP integrations and duplicates. Anyway I'm waiting for your response about of the elements i misplaced.

Note: NRW ALKIS is Germany's land registry. I know by experience that this kind of data does not reflect accurate positions in reality. Please do not use this resource to demonstrate accurate positions. Example:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/205819292 this way's northern end was previously straight like in NRW's ALKIS whereas it is supposed to have a curve as i corrected. You can see on aerial photos from NRW that it is indeed curved.

Finally, are you user )( who contacted me first?
tux67 (2021-10-02 15:12:24+00:00): "The way you updated the farmland ..." translates to changes to the boundaries of landuse=farmland 
Thought that should have been specific enough in the context of the comment of the thread-starter.

But anyway - maybe not worth a longer debate at a weekend.

Not commenting other elements of the CS.

I usually use NRW DOP or individual tracks for highway=x
But choosing the right ALKIS Layer, it shows property boundaries - this one is reliable and fits to the initial cause of the thread.

"Finally, are you user )( who contacted me first?"
No. 

BR 
tux67
SHARCRASH (2021-10-02 15:40:39+00:00): I asked you which element(s) exactly, such as  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107079678, for example. This is one of the very few areas i changed the perimeter. The other areas are: 
Actually the others are: 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11776714 because of multiple overlapping meadows with the  forest
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96744468 because of overlapping farmland and meadows
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247186289 was overlapping also with forest and actually the perimeter with forest was not correct, i admit still not perfect after my intervention but it's certainly not worse, it is now more enhanced compared to previous state.

The rest were highways.

Well... it seems like it was worth to give me swiftly a bad rating from your part... But what if you made a mistake and it's not me... It happened several times contributors think it's me and i was able to demonstrate i was not the original person who misplaced. Hence why I am asking you exactly which elements... But if you are not able to give me evidences... Indeed it's certainly not worth commenting and i will recall our communication.
tux67 (2021-10-02 16:21:12+00:00): As you took the feedback serious, you're right and I at least owe you the effort to explain the trigger of seeing parts of the CS as a step backward:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107097679 has been combined with 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107097644 while it's visible as differently used areas OTG and Flurstücke Layer in ALKIS.
Similar statement for replacing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107097449 by expansion of 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107097431

No complaints about the rest so far - focused for now only on the areas the thread starter mentioned.

Hope that's now sufficiently explicit 
tux67
tux67 (2021-10-04 06:25:24+00:00): "that you pay more attention to this futile detail instead" 
That's what the thread starter complained about and despite the fact that I understand your arguments about landuse merging,  I do not agree with them.
Where I see (over years of areal imagery) diffently used fields I see no error in mapping them as separate.

BR
tux67
emvee (2021-10-01 21:01:19+00:00): Hoi,

In deze changeset heb je o.a voor https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7520416

bicycle=use_sidepath

verandert in:

cycleway=seperate

Dat vindt ik geen goed idee, er ligt een fietspad naast en dan is bicycle=use_sidepath de aangewezen tag.

Groeten,

Martin.
eggie (2021-10-02 06:52:31+00:00): Hoi... 
Het is 'lekker' onduidelijk hier.. Vooral door de belijning. 
Denk dat deze tagging wel kan, maar dat inderdaad bicycle=use_sidepath extra nodig is voor de juiste routering.
Je komt ander verkeerd uit.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dseparate

cycleway=separate is alleen maar een indicatie en zegt niets over de verplichting wel of niet het aparte fietspad nemen.
Hier is het een G11 fietspad dus het fietspad is verplicht.


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dseparate

Groet
eggie
eggie (2021-10-02 07:02:37+00:00): Op de Burgemeester Diepenhorstsingel  het ik bicycle=uee_sidepath toegevoegd.. De routering gaat anders daar nergens meer goed. 
Die tag is echt essentieel.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-02 07:49:40+00:00): typo use_sidepath
FERINA365 (2021-10-02 09:27:25+00:00): Bedankt heren voor deze informatie. Ik kon er op Wiki maar geen wijs uit worden wanneer use_sidepath benodigd was. Ik dacht eigenlijk dat cycleway=seperate en bicycle=use_sidepath hetzelfde deden met de routering. 

Thanks voor jullie scherpheid! 

Fijn weekend.
emvee (2021-10-03 11:12:34+00:00): Op de wiki bestaat cycleway=seperate niet, zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dseperate maar bicycle=use_sidepath wel, zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath

De cycleway key geeft fysieke eienschappen aan, de bicycle key access/toegangsattributen.

Groeten,

Martin.
eggie (2021-10-03 11:31:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dseparate

Het is ook separate..
Ik gebruik die tag eigenlijk nooit.
emvee (2021-10-03 12:03:23+00:00): Naar mijn idee is het een overbodige tag als er een fietspad is gemapt, het enige doel dat ik zie is aan te geven dat er een apart fietspad is maar dat nog niet op de kaart staat.

Die wiki pagina bestaat nog niet zo lang en (gelukkig) is het gebruik laag.
eggie (2021-10-03 12:39:11+00:00): Martin... Ik denk dat het ook met de ontwikkeling van Street Complete te maken heeft. .. cycleway=no e.d Ik zie ook de meerwaarde niet. Iedereen kan zo al zien dat er apart getekende fietspaden zijn.
Mvg
Eggie
Eggie
eggie (2021-10-01 17:42:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip: Eigen bedrijf toevoegen 

https://www.onosm.org/ 

en 

 

https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/11/46.87897/8.23975 

 

En video 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6edDUi1o9RA 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-01 17:53:19+00:00): Dag Studio..
Volgens het Kadasteren de BGT  is het hier juiste wel de Reginahof.
Mocht dat niet kloppen kun je een terugmelding doen naar het kadaster via deze site.
https://www.verbeterdekaart.nl/#?geometry.x=66189.74&geometry.y=418575.9&zoomlevel=15.33
Het apartementencomplex heeft als adres Reginahof? 
Doe je een terugmelding?
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-22 13:57:30+00:00): Why you made this edit? This medicines are not recycled.

Please do not make edits that reduce quality of OSM data.
mueschel (2021-10-22 14:21:34+00:00): There are plenty tags in the recycling:* scheme that are not recycled, but either burned, put to landfill or re-used. Despite the name, the namespace is not limited to recycling, strictly.

Actually, the documented tag is "recycling:drugs", not "recycling:medicines", so my edit wasn't fully right.

A namespace "trash_accepted" is not used anywhere.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-22 19:31:25+00:00): Every tag and namespace was created at some point.

"tag X is not used elsewhere" is not a valid reason for retagging if some info would be lost

And popularity of some misleading tagging is not really sufficient to justify autromated retagging
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-10-22 19:32:11+00:00): https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org//search?q=recycling%3Adrugs is used just 312 times so it is not even so dominant
mueschel (2021-10-23 07:41:27+00:00): It's always bad to have two different tags that have exactly the same meaning. If you want to introduce a new scheme with a better name (which your tag definitely is), we should deprecate the old one and document the new one first.
whb (2024-02-16 21:02:55+00:00): Guten Tag,

könntest du vielleicht noch die Schwierigkeit des Weges eintragen?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sac_scale

Viele Grüße
whb
A636374747 (2024-03-03 12:52:00+00:00): ist erledigt
plennert (2021-10-03 10:13:47+00:00): Hallo opendcc,
ich verstehe Deine Änderung nicht. Ein Eingang ist kein Ausgang. Ich verweise an dieser Stelle auf folgende Diskussion:
 https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71138

Bitte korrigiere diese.

Viele Grüsse
Ralph
opendcc (2021-10-03 16:05:21+00:00): Das war getagged mit entrance=no
exit=yes, und das habe ich ersetzt durch extrance=exit. entrance=no ist nirgends definiert und wird wildwest-style verwendet: einmal um darauf hinzuweisen, dass man hier nicht rein kann (im sinne von oneway), zum anderen um z.B. eine zugemauerte Öffnung mit zugeweisener Adresse zu kennzeichnen. Wie sieht denn Deiner Meinung das korrekte Tagging hier aus?
plennert (2021-10-05 15:17:22+00:00): naja, ein Eingang ist ein Eingang und kein Ausgang. Ein Ausgang ist ein Ausgang und kein Eingang.
Eine Türe kann entweder nur ein Eingang oder nur ein Ausgang oder eben beides sein.
Im voliegenden Fall sind die Türen eben nur Ausgänge und keine Eingänge. Daher
-entrance=no
-exit=yes

Der entrance-Tag sagt ja nichts über die Ausgangssituation aus, sondern nur was über die Eingangssituation.
Das wurde so auch im Forum bestätigt und die entsprechenden WIKI-Seite weisen dies auch so aus.
opendcc (2021-10-05 15:28:23+00:00): Bitte wo genau ist entrance=no im wiki zu finden?
opendcc (2021-10-05 15:31:36+00:00): Ich finde aber eine Beschreibung zu entrance=exit. Also 'entrance' bedeutet: hier ist ein Loch in der Wand. Und die Werte geben an, was für ein Loch. main, home, exit usw.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-28 04:55:13+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3283344 ?
SammysHP (2021-12-25 22:20:12+00:00): Hallo,
 
handelt es sich hierbei um ein Ladengeschäft, das von Kunden betreten werden kann? Wenn nein, dann sollte dieser Eintrag besser entfernt werden. Wo Personen wohnen, die ortsunabhängig Dienstleistungen anbieten, interessiert in OSM nicht.
 
Viele Grüße
SammysHP
Mirco Gabriel (2021-12-26 08:22:48+00:00): Hallo,
Guter Hinweis, vielen Dank. 
Werde ich entfernen.
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-29 03:02:39+00:00): 是“宝鸡过境高速”不是“鸡过境高速”啊

后者意思是“Chicken pass expressway”啊

---

Hey, ff5722, I think your edit may miss a character "宝" before "鸡", which will let people misunderstand that this expressway is build for chicken. 
XD
ff5722 (2022-01-29 11:11:12+00:00): 谢你 我修正了
user_11418917 (2021-10-05 04:54:33+00:00): Hello Dear friend,      
Why did you remove "قاعة دار السلام" and you also removed the 3d shaped dome?        
And can you please write the changeset comment for your future edits instead of just "update", let us know what you edited so it's easier for us to understand and to help and improve if needed.       
Regards.
user_12523467 (2021-10-05 06:10:07+00:00): Hello Dear,
about the " قاعة دار السلام" I didn't remove it, just changed it borders. and " مسجد المصطفى" dome is being added in the tag (addr:city=Baghdad
building=mosque
height=3
roofColor=#30D5C8
roofShape=dome) . and about change set comment I'll make a brief description next time, much appreciated your concern.

Regards.
user_11418917 (2021-10-05 07:30:25+00:00): Hello,     
Just re-added the 3D look dome shape for "مسجد المصطفى"       
Regards.
user_12523467 (2021-10-05 07:36:34+00:00): Hi, good job, but there is a fountain under the dome circumference.

Regards.
user_11418917 (2021-10-05 07:55:12+00:00): Oh, I thought it’s a mistake. I apologize for that. I will add it back later today with a note tag description saying there is a fountain under the dome. You can add it back before me if you want.     
Regards.
user_11418917 (2021-10-06 05:14:58+00:00): Dear friend, Fountain re-added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112150029 , what do you think? is it good or do you want me to improve it? I also added the base inside building under the dome based on pictures I found online.       
Regards.
user_11418917 (2021-10-06 05:29:33+00:00): Also in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112150636
user_12523467 (2021-10-06 05:49:44+00:00): Hi, great effort you did, thank very much.. the mosque is a masterpiece, I wish I can upload sketchup 3D model of it to OSM.

1- shorturl.at/ceoIV
2- shorturl.at/hoHNU
3- shorturl.at/msvE8
4- shorturl.at/wRSW8
5- shorturl.at/bcgyU
user_11418917 (2021-10-06 06:44:27+00:00): Hello, The links you provided are not working. You can post the full links or message them to me and I will do my best.    
Regards.
kapazao (2022-12-06 12:29:39+00:00): Buenas, ¿sabes en qué estado esta el puente?
Si está en construcción es mejor haberlo puesto el etiquetado highway=construction + construction=secondary, más que solo poner access=no.
En cuanto al carril bici si ocurre igual pues highway=construction + construction=cycleway.
Un saludo
ielham (2022-12-06 12:35:15+00:00): Sigue cortado el acceso ya que el mantenimiento del mismo iba a durar más de un año. Tanto el puente como el carril bici en paralelo. Le deben quedar aún unos meses. Para fechas señaladas como navidades es probable que lo abran al tráfico unos días pero lo volverán a cerrar.
Reviso luego lo que me comentas. Gracias!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-10-05 07:19:09+00:00): أستاذي الكريم أشكرك على مجهودك لكن مسميات الشوارع لا تترجم وإنما تكتب كما هي بالانجليزية وهذا المعمول به رسمياً لأن الترجمة قد تكون خاطئة مثل ترجمتك الخرج بـexit والتي تعني مخرج ولا تعني الخرج
EneaSuper (2021-10-02 11:06:02+00:00): Ciao, da quello che so la Galleria delle Grazie dovrebbe essere quella adoperata, in parte, per la metropolitana dopo la stazione di Sarzano/Sant'Agostino, approssimativamente sotto a Porta Soprana.
fedc (2021-10-02 11:16:48+00:00): Ciao,
vero: la metà meridionale della galleria delle Grazie (da piazza Corvetto al porto) è stata riutilizzata dalla metropolitana, mentre la metà settentrionale (da Corvetto alla stazione Brignole) è rimasta in abbandono e viene attualmente riattivata con un nuovo binario ferroviario da Brignole a Principe sotterranea.
EneaSuper (2021-10-02 11:35:08+00:00): Capito, tutto chiaro, grazie del chiarimento 🙂
fedc (2021-10-02 11:54:54+00:00): Per maggiore chiarezza ho creato una relazione:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13283349
ScantLeopard336 (2021-10-02 03:23:35+00:00): Hey there, and welcome to OSM! I was just wondering why you deleted the walking trails from Wrensch Park. According to the Strava Heatmap, there's some sort of trail through the park that is not visible from satellite.

Happy Mapping,
Scant
Sunny Feng (2021-10-02 05:03:53+00:00): Hi, I just moved right next to the park recently. There is no path from Melrose Pl as this map suggests. I tried getting into the park but can't find an entrance. I asked my neighbors and apparently it used to have this well maintained path but then was reclaimed under environmental protection and is now overgrown and no longer walkable. Hoping to help out with accuracy in my area :)
ScantLeopard336 (2021-10-02 05:40:04+00:00): That's unfortunate, I heard the park was a cool hidden gem and was looking to visit it eventually. Though the heatmap shows the entrance is off Kanouse Place, so maybe it was just mapped incorrectly at some point.

Anyway, thanks for keeping an eye out for map errors around the area. There's still a lot of errors hiding, buildings to be mapped, and much more, so I appreciate whatever you can do to improve the area.
skyper (2021-10-01 16:28:52+00:00): Sorry, Angaben vergessen:
Kommentar: Gebäudeaktualisierung
Quellen: Maps4BW (LGL-BW, www.lgl-bw.de); Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta; Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta); Bing; OSM Notes
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-02 16:36:39+00:00): al posto di eliminare portevi solo rimuovere il tipo di relazione!
MitjaJez (2021-10-03 13:25:03+00:00): This relation is useless. You have networg tag for this. 42, 43, 44, and 39/ were correct but you made a mess.

When you collect all together it's imposible to add departments time
Please, read the documentation!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport

Or if you want, it's collecting here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mitjajez/public_transport
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-03 14:08:18+00:00): okay, i just tried to make all the lines of trieste the same in order to group in the relationship that you have unnecessarily deleted. I redid it by adding the fixme for the relationship type.
I do not find the sense of the osm rule of creating two relationships divided by return. this is of no use to the tags inherent foward and backward, since if you create different lines it is obvious that the paths are either foward or backward.
Greetings