piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-01-10 23:17:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45064832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps tracing Usage
Hjart (2016-09-28 19:15:49+00:00): What kind of Osmose error did you "fix" here?
Geofreund1 (2016-09-28 19:32:04+00:00): Mostly connections from parking places to the corresponding serving street.
Hjart (2016-09-28 19:41:12+00:00): Please note that routers do not take  amenity=parking into consideration, so to make routing work you really need to do something like i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56182026. What you're doing demonstrates a common misunderstanding and I was just wondering which Osmose error led you to this (I didn't spot anything obvious).
Hjart (2016-09-28 19:49:09+00:00): A better example could perhaps be https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56456181. To make routing work you need to connect roads and paths directly. Connecting them to the edge of the parking polygon isn't enough.
Geofreund1 (2016-09-29 09:48:16+00:00): In those cases I fixed, it was mainly not a routing problem, but Osmose complained about a missing access to the parking place like

http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.12034&mlon=13.50045#map=19/53.12034/13.50045&layers=N

What would be your solution for the above example?
Hjart (2016-09-29 09:59:10+00:00): I would do something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444879277 (note that I find it a little bit hard to see what's going on the ground and this is just my best guess)
Which Osmose instance is this and what's the text of this particular flag?
Hjart (2016-09-29 10:04:08+00:00): Note that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218719592 works in a similar way
Geofreund1 (2016-09-29 10:05:09+00:00): And what exactly is the reason, that your solution is so much better than

http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=53.12037&mlon=13.49957#map=19/53.12037/13.49957&layers=N
Hjart (2016-09-29 10:08:14+00:00): A good example of why it is better is http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=osrm_car&route=53.10906%2C13.49722%3B53.10947%2C13.49524
Hjart (2016-09-29 10:09:06+00:00): Note that routing stops where the road stops. It doesn't progress over the parking lot.
Geofreund1 (2016-09-29 10:14:29+00:00): Not every parking place has got a parking_aisle.
I think in most cases it is enough to lead the user to the entrance of the parking place, since in any case you have to look for a free space there yourself.
Hjart (2016-09-29 10:30:16+00:00): You could say that, but if you have to create roads as short as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444880270 just to "lead the user to the parking place", you could just as well make the extra effort to do what I propose. Also note that the layout of lanes on many parking lots are complex enough to make it a good idea to draw them.
Geofreund1 (2016-09-29 10:45:17+00:00): It is not because of leading the user to the parking place, but Osmose complained about "missing access to the parking place". Access in my opinion means just access and not routing on the parking place.
I have the feeling that we should stop the discussion here.
Hjart (2016-09-29 10:48:41+00:00): I have already asked you which instance of Osmose flags this as an error, because that instance of Osmose actually could be wrong/incorrect. Which one is it?
Hjart (2016-09-29 10:55:52+00:00): As a further example: If you parked your car at http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=54.41757&mlon=13.43516#map=19/54.41757/13.43516 and want to leave and turn on your car navigation, where do you think it will tell you to go?
Geofreund1 (2016-09-29 11:25:00+00:00): You can use Osmose via

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr

You can also look there for errors where Osmose thinks you should take care of.
Hjart (2016-09-30 12:04:17+00:00): Hmm.. I know and occasionally use that site. I just had never come across a flag like the one you describe, so I was wondering whether you were using a different site running Osmose with different checks.
AlexSpritze (2025-12-14 21:29:48+00:00): Hi Bernd,
hast du etwas Hintergrundinformationen zu dem Memorial? Vor Ort finde ich nichts.
user_5359 (2016-09-29 18:10:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the correct notation form.
Константин Гам (2018-11-15 13:56:18+00:00): Зачем дубли плодить?
PeeWee32 (2016-10-16 14:52:05+00:00): Hoi Dick

Je hebt op de Hanzeweg bicycle=no gezet. Ik ben er vandaag weer geweest maar heb nergens een verbodsbord gezien (C14, C15 etc. )  Ik zal er straks een bicycle=use_sidepath van maken. Mocht het het daar niet mee eens zijn dan moet je het maar laten weten.
Groet PeeWee32
dvdhoven (2016-10-16 15:14:16+00:00): Ja, dat is prima.
Blijft toch abitrair en ik kan niet goed wennen aan dat use_sidepath.
Voor mij betekenen die G11 en G12a gewoon dat je niks tussen de auto's te zoeken hebt, of je nu breed bent of niet.
Maar ik vind het uitstekend als je het aanpast. Het is ook meer "jouw" gebied dan het mijne :-)
Ik heb het laatst gereden omdat het ook bij de Fietsersbond in de planner moest en het eindelijk een fatsoenlijke noordzuidverbinding vormt. 
Die zijn daar niet veel.
De straatnamen heb ik uit een pdf, die ik met wat zoeken op internet heb gevonden.
PeeWee32 (2016-10-16 15:45:35+00:00): Ik snap dat het voor de meeste fietsers om het even is maar als er nog geen bicycle tag is opgegeven is het safer om een use_sidepath te nemen. Mocht iemand een expliciet verbodsbord zien dan wordt het toch wel een bicycle=no. Ik zet dan bv de traffic_sign=NL:C14 op de hoofdweg zodat ook dat helder is. Ik heb het net aangepast.

Groet
PeeWee32
PlaneMad (2016-11-17 09:44:20+00:00): There is a duplicate place here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4322351175
Alecs01 (2016-09-29 20:14:10+00:00): Cia Fabio, grazie delle aggiunte, ricordati che per convenzione in Italia "Via" in OpenStreetMap si scrive con l'iniziale maiuscola, e i nomi di persona vanno per esteso (nome e cognome) se possibile, vedi http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade ciao buon mapping
SomeoneElse (2021-04-12 14:31:42+00:00): Hello OrsiJenei,

Andy from OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group here.
I'm writing to you about https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/278 . A mapper there seem to have become a bit confused - I spotted an edit using the changeset comment "#hotosm-task-278" in South Wales.  It looks like they could benefit from a bit more supervision?

Best Regards,
Andy
Alecs01 (2016-10-02 13:22:47+00:00): Per favore non aggiungere informazioni personali (nomi dei resindenti all'indirizzo x), grazie
marc__marc (2026-02-11 14:39:07+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444828906
it's a natural=tree_row or natural=wood ?
Regards,
Marc
kartler175 (2016-10-01 11:22:54+00:00): Bitte landuse-Grenzen nicht mit highway-nodes verknüpfen. Das ist reines mappen für den Renderer und entspricht nicht der Realität und widerspricht somit den best practice-Regeln von OSM!
OF0 (2017-05-20 14:42:14+00:00): @Kartler175 Das passt schon: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes
Littlebtc (2016-09-29 13:52:02+00:00): Refined:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42519296
DannyAiquipa (2016-11-29 22:49:18+00:00): thanks for your correction, I will be more careful
user_4547543 (2016-09-28 22:59:22+00:00): should say: Actualizaciones en Chile. Reconocimiento cartográfico por KG 2016
user_4547543 (2016-09-28 23:00:34+00:00): should say: Actualizaciones en Chile. Reconocimiento cartográfico por KG 2016
user_4547543 (2016-09-28 22:59:58+00:00): should say: Actualizaciones en Chile. Reconocimiento cartográfico por KG 2016
TheSwavu (2016-09-29 01:29:50+00:00): You do realise that these all need to be connected to the appropriate waterways?
Warin61 (2016-09-29 06:55:16+00:00): Yep. 
I will target those with no local waterway first. Ones with adjacent waterway will be next. 

I have done one .. and that creek looks to have no 'outlet' .. other than some 'lakes'. Only another 194 to go.
Warin61 (2016-09-29 07:16:31+00:00): Humm ..
Maybe I should put a 'fixme' on them .. that way the 'fixme' can be removed by anyone who fixes it? 'fixme=attach to waterway' would do.
Warin61 (2016-10-02 23:34:38+00:00): Fixmes in place. 
I have done the 'easy ones' - those with existing simple waterways. These are quick so possibly were the best to 'fix' first. 
Around 105 left without waterways. And 5? that are on waterway areas ...
TheSwavu (2016-09-29 01:29:10+00:00): You appear to have added about 50 "new suburb in A.C.T"
nm7s9 (2016-09-29 06:58:09+00:00): Yes, bad choice of changset comment.  I suppose I should have said checking (and correcting) osm road names and adding maxspeed and other features during survey trip to new A.C.T suburbs.
Peuc (2016-09-30 15:33:04+00:00): Salut SanMarq,
Suite à notre discussion, j'ai trouvé le tag amenity=animal_shelter¹ qui est plus indiqué dans le cas de la SPCA. Je viens de faire la correction.

1 : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Danimal_shelter
SanMarq (2016-09-30 15:44:15+00:00): Merci beaucoup Peuc d'avoir pris le temps de voir à cela. C'est très apprécier.
Nakaner-repair (2016-09-29 15:12:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42521764 where the changeset comment is: Revert of changeset 42507717 which added temporary data. Please use umap.openstreetmap.fr or a self-hosted Leaflet map instead.
Nakaner (2016-09-29 15:14:15+00:00): Hallo miaumiaumiau,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM. Leider sah ich mich genötigt, diesen Änderungssatz zurückzusetzen. Objekte temporärer Natur werden bei OSM nicht erfasst. Siehe dazu auch das OSM-Wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Mappe_keine_vor.C3.BCbergehenden_Ereignisse_und_Objekte_tempor.C3.A4rer_Natur

Viele Grüße

Michael
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 16:25:25+00:00): its not a castle: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4423012390 eliminando
militrik (2016-09-29 20:14:58+00:00): Проверено. Данные соответствуют.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2020-02-02 16:21:12+00:00): I don't think the name of this cafe is "amenity=cafe" 😉 I've changed it here. If I'm wrong, please put it back
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80440170
glibbertorsten (2016-10-05 11:12:54+00:00): tag a building as landuse erases the building. Please keep both seperated and put back the buildings into the map. Thanks
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:20:42+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
marc__marc (2019-07-01 11:21:23+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3932840801
I don't understand your change.
is it a drinking water point or a shop that sells several stuff including water?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=drinking%20water
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=kiosk
Regards,
Marc
Giblet (2019-07-01 11:57:12+00:00): Hi Marc,

These are small shops that sell only drinking water. THere is no formal water system in this community.

Best,

Matt
marc__marc (2019-07-01 12:48:04+00:00): so it'sn't a amenity=drinking_water nor a shop=kiosk
that seem to be a small shop=water, isn't it ?
Владимир К (2016-09-30 07:44:40+00:00): а вы вот этими магазинами что обозначили? кассы или сами входы?
salwater (2016-09-30 12:46:16+00:00): Места, где собирают деньги. Скажем так.
Supaplex (2016-10-08 17:20:22+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Tchiller (2016-10-03 09:33:37+00:00): Sali, der müsste in Hausnummer 58 sein. Stimmt die Position nicht oder die Häusertrennung? Danke schön.
captain_slow (2016-10-03 10:49:52+00:00): ich weiss dass die adresse des ladens nummer 58 ist. möglicherweise ist der eingang noch in der nummer 58, aber der laden selbst ist dann im teil richtung westen und somit wohl in der 62, aber die postadresse ist 58. ob die häusertrennung genau stimmt weiss ich nicht.
captain_slow (2016-10-03 15:23:55+00:00): ich habe vorher auf der heimfahrt noch mal geschaut. der eingang ist ziemlich genau dort wo der punkt jetzt platziert ist. ich denke mal die adresse mit nummer 58 ist auch angegeben, damit man nicht am falschen ende des gebäudes sucht.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 17:57:15+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-06 18:40:23+00:00): Hello! Did you mean highway=path on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444855844 ?
newbie_paul (2016-11-07 07:19:43+00:00): Hi, Yes you are correct.  Fixed it!  I am new to looking at changesets.  How do you find the changeset for a particular entry?  From the web, I click on history and get nothing.  I click on an object when in history and nothing.  BTW, how did you happen to find this mistake? Thanks.
newbie_paul (2016-11-07 15:38:29+00:00): It is unlikely anyone will see this, but, here is the answer to my question, likely known by most folks who see this.
find a changeset for an object
  in JOSM
  click on object (select it)
  in "changesets" section of right pane
  click for selected objects only
  right click on entry with changeset number
  select show info
  opens a browser window to the changeset
  can view, comment,...
user_5359 (2016-11-07 18:20:34+00:00): in the web the changset number directly next  to the version number.

I found this mistake with tool taginfo.openstreetmap.org using the button overpass turbo (or directly https://overpass-turbo.eu).
d1g (2016-09-29 18:06:02+00:00): Придирусь к b=house, b=yes менее ошибочный. Было пара объктов похожих на коровники и сараи по снимку.

Наверняка все объекты не знаем.
iWowik (2016-09-30 18:39:52+00:00): Но на них люди написали что это Дом, то есть они там живут :)
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
Athalis (2016-09-29 12:43:05+00:00): Hallo m-f-p,

Danke für die Ergänzungen :)

Hier noch zwei Tips: Wahrscheinlich würde hier an diesem Knoten der Tag office=company noch gut passen, ohne weitere Angabe ist es leider nicht ersichtlich worauf sich der Name bezieht. Die Adresse ist im Knoten übrigens unnötig da sie bereits am Eingang erfasst ist (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:One_feature,_one_OSM_element).
eggie (2019-05-21 08:30:07+00:00): Ooit de eerste edit buiten Nedrland, daarom nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen. Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
de vries (2017-07-14 08:08:20+00:00): Hoi EOS,
wat bedoel je met de tag "zone:traffic=BE:urban" die je in deze changeset aan een groot aantal wegen hebt toegevoegd?
mvg
MadelNL (2017-07-15 04:05:36+00:00): Hoi Jaap,

Da's met een verkeerde plugin gedaan. Ik zal ze een dezer dagen wijzigen. 
Bedankt voor de tip!
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
rarad74 (2016-09-29 09:36:27+00:00): Please do not add again names of the buildings to the housenumber. Thank you.
indigomc (2016-10-06 18:46:10+00:00): Please state why you deleted two roads, and created this as a secondary road with an embankment?
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
indigomc (2016-10-06 18:50:49+00:00): Why delete one roundabout with a properly spelt name to create another all in lowercase?
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
indigomc (2016-10-06 18:52:31+00:00): Here you've deleted one road and then added it again. Only the second time it has been added as a primary road while the other carriageway going the other way remains a secondary road. Why?
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
Tomas Straupis (2016-09-29 10:54:55+00:00): maxspeed rodo koks yra maksimalus leidžiamas greitis pagal KET, o ne koks siūlomas, pageidaujamas ar pan. Ir tuo labiau negalima kaitalioti info tam, kad kažkur kažkoks įrankis grąžintų „norimus“ rezultatus, yra kertinė OSM taisyklė: „don't tag for the renderer“.
Tomas Straupis (2016-09-29 10:57:37+00:00): Šitos klasifikacijos keliai Lietuvoje visada žymimi highway=secondary.

Maršrutizavimą turi tvarkyti maršrutizavimo programos kūrėjai, negadinant duomenų ir nepritempinėjant duomenų prie norimo rezultato.
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
IIVQ (2016-10-03 20:46:46+00:00): Hoi Bouncer,

Je hebt in deze changeset een aantal wegen op "niet geopend" gezet, maar voor het stukje A1 ri Amsterdam ter hoogte van het nieuwe Muiden P+R klopt dat niet; dat is gewoon open voor iig bussen.  Dus waarom heb je dat als construction getagd?
Bouncer (2016-10-03 21:32:07+00:00): Er was een set wegen op open gezet terwijl ze nog in aanbouw zijn. Het stuk bij p+r muiden is afgesloten voor verkeer en nog niet open geweest, vandaar dat ik het mee had genomen en terug op construction heb gezet. In feite ligt de weg er al wel, dus je zou het ook construction weg kunnen halen en de weg op gesloten kunnen zetten. Ik vond deze oplossing de actuele situatie duidelijker aangeven voor normaal verkeer.
IIVQ (2016-10-04 17:55:26+00:00): Ik was er van overtuigd dat die weg al open is, maar ik zal het binnenkort nog eens nakijken.
Bouncer (2016-10-04 18:20:21+00:00): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpdScUMgNaI#t=2m50s
Zie de afzetting rechts. Kan zijn dat het sinds 28/9 is veranderd, maar ik denk dat ze het dicht houden tot de parallelbaan verderop klaar is.
IIVQ (2016-10-04 19:45:07+00:00): Dan rijden de bussen van Connexxion al 3 weken niet de juiste route :-)
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
luiswoo (2016-09-29 13:58:30+00:00): скамья на шоссе, что бы это значило?
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:54:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:57:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
Владимир К (2016-09-30 07:35:37+00:00): сместо магазина вы отметили адресную точку
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
Nakaner (2016-09-29 15:29:35+00:00): Hallo mh_le,

herzlich willkommen bei OSM.

Bitte beachte, dass OSM eine Datenbank für Geodaten und kein Kartenprojekt ist. Die Karte auf openstreetmap.org ist nur ein Beispiel, was man mit OSM-Daten machen kann. Es gibt viele weitere Nutzer unserer Daten, die damit selbst Karten zeichnen („rendern“). Bitte verschiebe daher nicht Objekte einfach so, dass sie angezeigt werden. Objekte werden dort erfasst, wo sie sind. Wenn viele Objekte dicht bei einander sind, werden halt nicht alle angezeigt. Das ist halt so.

Siehe dazu auch die http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=18063 (ins Forum kannst du dich mit deinem OSM-Benutzerkonto einloggen) und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Viele Grüße

Michael
Zverik (2016-10-20 09:46:04+00:00): Здравствуйте, вы, кажется, перепутали «метки» в maps.me с редактором общедоступной карты. Я откатил эти изменения, извините.
Nakaner (2016-09-29 15:24:51+00:00): Hallo Traumschiffkapitän,

besser als die Brücke nur zu löschen (gut, dass du einen aussagekräftigen Änderungssatzkommentar eingegeben hast), wäre es, an den Ende der Rampen noexit=yes + note="Brücke abgerissen" zu taggen. Sonst kommt bestimmt irgendwann ein Sesselmapper, der keine Ortskenntnis hat und ergänzt die auf den Bing-Bildern sichtbare, "fehlende" Brücke.

Könntest du das bitte noch machen?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Владимир К (2016-09-30 07:34:52+00:00): это ведь личная заметка?
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:55:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
sanjayb (2016-10-07 18:56:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 42718779 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import