piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FransFeytens (2021-12-07 09:55:40+00:00): Klopt. Het NO deel van de stallingen is met milieuvergunning  grondig verbouwd en opgeslitst als aparte wooneenheid met nr 41. Is bijna klaar, maar nog niet in gebruik. Mogelijk nog niet in alle systemen actueel.
FransFeytens (2021-12-07 09:57:15+00:00): Misschien nog even wachten tot nr. 41 effectief bewoond is?
Jakka (2021-12-07 10:03:05+00:00): Dan kunnen we dat inderdaad inpassen. De officiële data krt laten soms op zich wachten. Koerier diensten en andere kunnen dan al profiteren van osm ;) Nu staat op N deel de naam van de hoeve Zo wordt nr niet getoond.... Is deze naam belangrijk ?
Jakka (2021-12-07 10:03:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/764459503
FransFeytens (2021-12-07 10:25:54+00:00): Het is/was inderdaad zo goed als onmogelijk om via koerier iets te bestellen. Heb bij Google nr. 39 (goedgekeurd) en nr 41 (pending) ook laten aanpassen.
eggie (2021-12-06 12:04:37+00:00): Dag Lars,
Tip:
Wanneer een weg gereed is dan ook de regel construction=residential verwijderen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-12-06 12:06:02+00:00): Er liggen ook twee wegen in de Marterstraat op elkaar en het kruispunt zit los van elkaar.
Lars Derks (2021-12-06 12:47:59+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Ik heb de wegen nu opgeknipt en aangegeven welke stukken wel klaar zijn en welke nog niet. De wegen over elkaar heb ik gecorrigeerd.

construction=residential heb ik nu verwijderd waar de weg klaar is. Bedankt voor de tip. Zo leer ik weer wat bij.

Groeten,
Lars
Warin61 (2021-12-06 23:03:57+00:00): Hi
Would not these 'shelters' be better mapped as covered walkways? highway=footway, covered=yes, surface=paved ???
someart13 (2021-12-06 12:19:02+00:00): #mbx_uk_editing
enemenebene (2021-12-28 22:20:24+00:00): In der Intzestraße sind keine Parkplätze im Sinne des wikis und als Beschreibung einer größeren Fläche zum Parken, wie z.B. nebenan in der Claßenstraße zwischen Nobis und CARL, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=parking.

Die vorhandenen Stellplätze sind als "parking:lane:both=perpendicular" an der Linie  und mit dieser Änderung nun doppelt erfasst. Ich schlage daher vor, die Flächen weiterhin nicht als Parkplatz zu erfassen, weil das etwas andere beschreibt als Stellplätze am Fahrbahnrand.
eggie (2021-12-06 13:39:27+00:00): Oke... bijna goed..

Lastig om 'foutjes' te ontdekken in het begin.
De kruising Veldzicht Marterstraat zit nog los.

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-12-07 10:46:38+00:00): Duplicated nodes fixed
Vinber-Pro (2021-12-17 17:02:22+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue Sandro64,

est-ce voulu d'avoir retiré sport=surfing de la surf academy ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5406105333/history

Bonne cartographie
silversurfer83 (2023-06-20 13:14:01+00:00): Moin,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.91968/10.69061 hier gibt es jetzt ein Neubaugebiet und deine wunderschöne Graslandrelation macht es nicht gerade einfach da vernünfitg zu arbeiten.
Wie wär's: Du setzt dich mal da dran und machst das jetzt hübsch?

Silversurfer83
PT-53 (2022-08-18 05:18:57+00:00): Hallo pietz,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz diese Straße
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009602973/history
nei eingezeichnet und u.a. mit den Merkmalen
- construction=yes
- highway=residential
versehen. Diese Merkmalkombination sollte nicht verwendet werden.

Für Straßen, die neu gebaut werden oder die wegen längerfristigen Baustellen (mind. 6 Monate, besser erst ab 9 Monaten) gesperrt werden, sollte die Merkmal-Kombination
highway=construction
construction=* (z.B. residential, tertiary, primary …)
verwendet werden.
Wiki: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dconstruction

Sollte die Straße schon fertig sein, sollte das Merkmal 
construction=yes wieder gelöscht werden.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an? 

Grüße
pietz (2022-08-18 07:28:29+00:00): Ist erledigt. Aber das hab ich ja nicht absichtlich gemacht sondern die Werte standen im DropDown-Menü von OSM eben zur Auswahl. Dann sollte man auch die Auswahl auf korrekte ZUsammenhänge reduzieren, oder?

Grüße
PT-53 (2022-08-18 09:02:36+00:00): Hallo pietz,
das sollte keine Vorwurf sondern nur ein Hinweis sein.

Du hast mit dem intergrierten Editor ID gearbeitet. Der frühere Entwickler von ID ist dafür bekannt, daß er sich bei seinen Vorlagen öfters nichts an das Wiki gehalten hat. Zwischenzeitlich gibt es einen neuen Enmtwickler und die ID-Vorlagen werden nach und nach überarbeitet. Das wirtd aber wohl noch ertwas andauern.

Danke für die Berichtigung.

Grüße
pietz (2022-08-18 09:37:34+00:00): Habs nicht als Vorwurf gesehen ;) Grüße :)
CHANEL2NO (2021-12-06 13:38:36+00:00): مرکز تخصصى زيبايى ويــولا
⭕️تزریق ژل وبوتاکس💉
⭕️ليفت صورت و جوانسازى
⭕️خدمات ليزر
⭕️مزوتراپى مو و صورت
لاغرى و ...
☎️76 70 61 48
📱09356074737
مدیریت ۰۹۱۲۱۸۲۴۷۷۲
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:11:03+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114490867, 114490996, 114506386, 114541966, 114541984, 114562030, 114562148, 114562262, 114562278, 114562586, 114562800, 114562913, 114562931, 114563088, 114563265, 114563270.
Marcos Dione (2022-10-24 14:38:26+00:00): I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/451656896 has a typo
miroslavuzice87 (2022-10-25 07:07:17+00:00): Hello Marcos, thank you for reaching out to us. Could you be a bit more specific and tell us what is actual typo mistake?
Marcos Dione (2022-10-27 07:57:49+00:00): 'Humedal Corodba'
Frans S (2021-12-10 14:01:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
Tag buildings as building=yes


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114619316
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 14:14:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5498
Frans S (2021-12-20 13:31:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Buildings with an extention should be mapped as 1 building (6nodes)
See link to achavi page
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115167024


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114619570
marczoutendijk (2021-12-06 13:43:49+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 114588754, 114588857, 114588950, 114589004, 114589091, 114589113, 114589167, 114589307, 114589345, 114589480, 114589539, 114589579, 114589692, 114589766, 114589829, 114589854, 114589882, 114589989, 114590019, 114590105, 114590196, 114590312, 114590347, 114592333, 114592358, 114592576, 114619291, 114619395, 114619421, 114619514.
aledue (2021-12-06 20:58:53+00:00): Chiedo scusa, ma quale sarebbe il significato delle way senza tag che hai aggiunto? :)
MarcoR (2021-12-07 17:38:09+00:00): Io penso che sia un tentativo di tracciare il percorso della mezza maratona di Pisa :)

Il percorso è già visibile su https://www.maratonadipisa.com/competitive/cetilar-maratona-di-pisa-la-competizione-e-il-percorso/ con OpenStreetMap come sfondo.

A mio avviso questi percorsi su OSM possono essere cancellati (tranne rare eccezioni, infatti, non si dovrebbero mappare eventi temporanei).
MarcoR (2021-12-09 21:44:21+00:00): Ho annullato la modifica con questo gruppo di modifiche: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114760947

Possiamo sempre discuterne se volete (ogni modifica può essere annullata).

A presto,
Marco.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
NieWnen (2021-12-13 21:14:37+00:00): Budowa rozgrzebana, nic się nie dzieje – nikogo nie ma, bo śnieg przeszkadza.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
eggie (2021-12-06 14:56:52+00:00): Dag HBA

Je vraagt feedback. 
Eeen toevoeging is natuurlijk oke. (Het gebouwtje is niet bekend bij het Kadaster. )
Er is al een adresnode op het hoofdgebouw. Beter geen adressen toevoegen aan de gebouw omtrek.
Is het een keet (dan niet name=Keet toevoegen)  of heet het gebouw officieel Keet?

MVG
eggie
Iltis183 (2021-12-06 15:10:54+00:00): Eggie,

Het heet "Keet" en het is een bouwkeet bestaande uit 3 delen 600x700cm.
eggie (2021-12-06 15:26:23+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk. Wel beter om het adres te verwijderen. De locatie heeft al een adresnode.
Mapse
Eggie
Iltis183 (2021-12-07 10:02:11+00:00): Adressering verwijderd.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
PT-53 (2021-12-07 07:06:36+00:00): Hallo pabul,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast an diesem Gebäude in Riedlingen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242230340/history
die Adressangaben
addr:housenumber=3
addr:postcode=88499
addr:street=Schlachthausstraße
eingetragen.

Diese Adresse gehört aber zu diesem Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242230342/history
und ist dort auch schon seit Jahren vermerkt.
Da die Adresse jetzt doppelt vorhanden war, was nicht sein sollten, habe ich Deine Eingaben dort wieder gelöscht.

Bei dem von Dir eingetragenen (illegalen) Campingplatz "Waldbesetzung Ravensburg" handelt es sich nicht um einen Campingplatz im OSM-Sinn.
Ich habe Deinen Eintrag daher wieder gelöscht.

Grüße aus dem Landkreis BC
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
Arminus (2022-10-02 18:27:41+00:00): Fun fact: Inzwischen hat jemand eine alte Karte im Bayernatlas ausgegraben in der der Bockstein 1808-1864 tatsächlich am Breitenstein Westgipfel verortet wird: https://geoportal.bayern.de/bayernatlas/?lang=de&topic=ba&bgLayer=historisch&E=723690.89&N=5289603.80&zoom=15&catalogNodes=11
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:28:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:28:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
adrianojbr (2021-12-07 22:31:05+00:00): Olá, Nathan! É importante dividir a via com limite de altura no trecho que está sob o delimitador, pois ao marcar maxheight=* num trecho longo, todo ele fica com restrição, mesmo não tendo limite.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114621751
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
Frans S (2021-12-08 14:58:04+00:00): Hello.
Never connect a waterway to a highway.
Only when it continue on the other side of a road, you can map and tag a bridge or a ford. 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114622229
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
conifermapper (2021-12-06 19:03:27+00:00): Is this some sort of revenge thing or do you genuinely belive that grass pastures are farmland?
etgg (2021-12-06 21:19:08+00:00): Firstly, my only interest is in creating a more accrate map that better reflects the actual usage of the places being mapped. I only map places that I have been to in person or know well.  Farmland is both pastoral and arable and pertains to all the land operated by a farm. A meadow is a very specific type of grassland that is not regularly grazed by livestock. Since from aerial imagery you cannot tell the difference (generally) between a true meadow and grass farmland the likelihood is that it is farmland by default. 70% of the UK is farmland which is made up of both pastoral and arable. Non-grazed meadows form a very small proportion of this figure so the default position should be that they are tagged as farmland first. Please see the wiki note on farmland here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland and the wiki note on meadows here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dmeadow and the wikipedia description of a meadow here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meadow
SomeoneElse (2021-12-10 10:18:42+00:00): It's possible to further classify farmland with an extra tag, such as "farmland=pasture" for farmland that is predominantly or currently pastoral.  I added that as a slightly different colour to https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=16&lat=54.08448&lon=-1.04706 - that lighter green is regular farmland, but usually has sheep on it.  None of that shows up here https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=14&lat=51.07093&lon=-1.62774 , because I suspect the farmland hasn't been further classified.
etgg (2021-12-10 15:23:46+00:00): Hi, thanks for taking an interest in the subject matter. Personally, where the grass fields in question are unknown (without an in person survey) if they are in use as pasture/grazing, or as set-aside (out of date terminology I know), or as a rotation crop to boost nitrogen for the next crop in that field then I would say they would be best tagged with crop=grass (as that covers all bases) rather than pasture meaning grazing for cattle/sheep/horses etc. To your second point - I think the question over how the many iterations of map styles and renderers out in existence across the web using openstreetmap data interpolate this classification system is secondary to the classification system of tagged land and especially the hierarchy of that tagging. In this instance I am proposing that the landuse=farmland tag (and crop=grass where appropriate) has a higher priority of use over the more blanket / vanilla use of just the landuse=grass tag. Happy to discuss this further in / outside of specific changesets though since it's a bit of a big topic....
RicoElectrico (2021-12-07 10:01:35+00:00): Hej, nie dodałeś w tej edycji parkingu, jedynie alejkę parkingową niepołączoną z siecią drogową. Spójrz w innych miejscach jak są oznaczone parkingi.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:28:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:28:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
ovruni (2021-12-06 23:20:46+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios solamente se indica " actualizacion de la ciudad", sin embargo se han generado varios vías superpuestas, cruces de vías, ademas de vías a enlaces.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
lasagna (2022-02-19 02:04:16+00:00): This looks like a good changeset. Out of curiosity, did you do a survey to confirm that the minor road does not exist?
I noticed that someone else added that road back (changeset 114653412), and if that was wrong I'd like to clear things up and delete the road again.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:29:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114651543 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
Srdjan023 (2021-12-06 16:04:38+00:00): *residential
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.
marczoutendijk (2021-12-07 09:07:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114650470 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism with duplicated highways and fantasy names.