piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DD1GJ (2017-07-12 22:02:56+00:00): Hallo Fabian, insbesondere durch Löschungen wie hier zerstörst Du die Konsistenz anderer Wander- und Radwegrelationen. Du fügst zwar das gelöschte Wegstück gleich wieder ein, berücksichtigst dann aber nur Deine eigene Relation, so dass bei den anderen Relationen dann Wegstücke fehlen. Da die Analyse und Reparatur sehr aufwändig sind, werden in Kurze wahrscheinlich viele Deiner Änderungen zurückgesetzt werden. Höre bitte für den Rest der Woche mit Deinen Edits auf und arbeite Dich in JOSM ein. Dieser Editor warnt vor solchen Fehlern
Upendrakarukonda (2017-07-13 05:46:03+00:00): Hi  Sc0tt Wallace,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. You have changed the power = line to highway = road. Seems like power = line is appropriate tag according to the imagery you mentioned. Can you look into this ?

Regards,

Upendra
Sc0tt Wallace (2017-07-13 08:36:08+00:00): Hi Upendra,
Yesterday was my first attempt with an Open Street Map session. I may have changed the power line to a road as you have suggested. The changeset 50224798 is quite large, could you help me narrow the search and identify the line.
Thanks,
Scott.
Upendrakarukonda (2017-07-13 10:54:10+00:00): Hi Sc0tt Wallace,

Thanks for getting back. Sure I will change this highway back to power line. For more learning you can go through this link https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide Happy to help.

Happy mapping,

Upendra
pyrog (2019-05-20 13:17:17+00:00): Re bonjour,
Plusieurs points :
- la nom "transformateur" est fait fait une description.
Il faurdrait plutôt utiliser power=transformer pour un vrai transformateur électrique (les deux rectangles alignés avec les deux bâtiments).

- Le bâtiment qui ressemble à un "transformateur" serait un"poste de transformation électrique". Il faut utiliser l'attribut OSM power=substation et préciser le type avec substation=* quand tu le connais.

Mais en pratique, c'est un local technique (building=service) à l'intérieur d'un poste de transformation électrique : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/123700763

Le landuse=industrial pourrait se mettre sur le poste (way/123700763).

- Quand à power=plant, c'est un poste de distribution, pas une centrale de production. Il faut donc supprimer cet attribut.
Cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:power=plant

Cordialement,

--
Yves

PS: le poste visible sur OpenInfraMap :
https://openinframap.org/#14.18/47.14045/6.32334
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/50225058
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-12 12:27:17+00:00): A checkpoint should be tagged is as military=checkpoint and not as tourism=viewpoint, but I don't know if maps.me supports this..
Nidal Elwan (2017-07-12 15:16:22+00:00): maps.me doesn't support this
Regina Phalange (2017-07-12 10:11:55+00:00): This is based on the map you can find here http://www.centrocommercialelarotonda.it/i-negozi/
southglos (2017-07-12 12:17:43+00:00): Be aware that some areas marked as leisure=park are tagged that way because ten years ago that was the only option for marking areas of grass.  Nowadays we have landuse=grass, so please feel free to re-tag rather than delete.
southglos (2017-07-12 12:25:22+00:00): Similarly, looking at the not-a-building, it's clear someone has mistagged a tennis court.  Again, better to fix the tagging than deleting (or drop a note on the map if it's something you're not sure how to fix yourself).
southglos (2017-07-12 12:38:23+00:00): Have reverted the deletions and updated tags.
mmassamm (2017-07-12 14:51:18+00:00): The tennis court is private and not available to the public. How does this affect the tagging?
southglos (2017-07-12 14:57:19+00:00): Just add access=private
More info on access tags here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
nevw (2017-07-13 05:44:15+00:00): Please don't try to make the map pretty by abusing the use of the highway tags.
Those roads are now incorrectly tagged as trunk. I expect they most likely should be tertiary or secondary if not residential.
nevw (2017-07-13 05:47:35+00:00): But apart from that, keep up the editing to improve your town  :)
Travo656 (2017-07-13 06:43:42+00:00): The roads changed are recognised by locals as 'trunk' roads or major roads, roads that have high volumes of traffic on them. Wasn't trying to make the map 'pretty' just more accurate. So I'm sorry if that is what it came across as. We don't really use the terms 'secondary or tertiary' in regards to roads in Australia. It's either minor, local or major.
nevw (2017-07-13 06:57:41+00:00): Hi Travo656
When mapping we normally use the info on the wiki as a guide e.g. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway but there are also country specific guidance for many tags for our country, including the roads and this is quite useful.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines
Regards
Nev
bluetable (2017-08-05 18:05:54+00:00): Hi Travo656. Sorry mate but I reverted the ways you changed to highway=trunk. As nevw mentioned, the rules for choosing a highway value are described on the wiki under Australian Tagging Guidelines. In Proserpine, only the A1 is a trunk. Apart from that, keep up the good work! Cheers.
eggie (2021-01-24 19:28:50+00:00): Tag Hermann ,

Alle Gebäude sind Import vom Niederländische Kataster. Bitte nicht ändern.
Bing ist 'outdated' und liegt verschoben.
Besser PDOK actueel benützen.

Grüss,
eggie
Wulf4096 (2019-05-07 05:40:29+00:00): Hallo!
Zur Info: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62906413
letihu (2019-05-07 06:05:22+00:00): Danke. Sollte ich irgendwas an meiner Arbeitsweise ändern?
Wulf4096 (2019-05-07 06:20:27+00:00): Du hattest dort Gebäude fälschlicherweise auseinandergezogen, vielleicht auf Basis von veralteten Luftbildern.
Allroads (2017-07-12 11:45:48+00:00): Een doorgaande weg binnen dorp gehucht is nooit residential.
Het is een belangrijkheids waardering. In het wegenstelcil.

Ook al is het 30 km/h.

De Waaldijk op unclassified houden.
Omegatherion (2017-07-13 08:01:56+00:00): Hallo Haenner, der Stadtplan ist keine erlaubte Quelle! Zudem ist die Addresse schon am Hauptgebäude erfasst. Bitte setze deine Änderungen zurück.
Nakaner (2017-07-13 09:31:09+00:00): Hallo Omegatherion,

hast du dir auch die anderen Änderungssätze von Henner angesehen? Die meisten haben laut Änderungssatzkommentar dieselbe unzulässige Quelle. So wie es auf den ersten Blick aussieht, werden wir wohl fast alle Änderungssätze der letzten zwei Jahre von Haenner zurücksetzen müssen. Soweit ich weiß, hat uns die Stadt Kiel keine Erlaubnis zur Übernahme von Informationen aus ihrem Stadtplanwerk erteilt. Man beweise mir das Gegenteil.

@Haenner: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:FAQ#Warum_benutzt_ihr_nicht_Google_Maps_oder_sonstwas_f.C3.BCr_eure_Daten.3F

Viele Grüße

Michael
Sanniu (2017-07-14 19:29:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506997022 and similar - These doesn't look like siding - may be crossover? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dcrossover
Can you also name these service stations, if you know the names?
TheNodeWarrior (2017-08-02 20:09:25+00:00): Hello Talal Alsubaie,

Welcome to OSM and thanks for contributing.  I noticed you removed Kuwait highway 40 and Saudi Arabia highway 95 which cross the Kuwait-Saudi Arabia border.  What is your reason for removing these highways?
Talal Alsubaie (2017-08-06 05:11:41+00:00): Dear,
I only, corrected the Kuwait-Saudi Arabia border line, not the highway 40 or 95.
sorry, it's my first editing with OpenStreetMap.
mueschel (2022-06-05 11:57:12+00:00): Hi,
you used the tag 'turnabout=no' on some bollards. This is not used in any other place - could you check that?
zstadler (2017-07-21 09:09:11+00:00): Hi,
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507012017 does not have any tags. Should it be removed?
.
Thanks!
zstadler (2021-07-11 17:24:28+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50476375
Vonter (2017-07-19 12:32:31+00:00): Nice work adding all the villages and towns.

Could you provide the link of the Github repository from which you got the list.
chandusekharreddy (2017-07-19 17:20:37+00:00): https://github.com/justinelliotmeyers

In this link we can all India villages
Vonter (2017-07-20 03:42:51+00:00): Thanks for the link!
indigomc (2017-07-20 16:53:05+00:00): Hi, I have some questions; 
Why are all the names in caps; they could surely have been proper cased first. And this looks like a mass import - is it, and if so has it been discussed appropriately?
Janjko (2017-07-12 13:34:16+00:00): This changeset made a mess of this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30790330

I'm not sure what was the intention, so I'm not going to try and fix it.
bhavana naga (2017-07-13 04:25:33+00:00): Thanks for reverting back the issue. I made the necessary changes as per the imagery.
Hjart (2017-07-12 13:21:40+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Jeg har lavet lidt rettelser ("knappet" stier på Kystvejen, Klintegårdsvej & Reedtzholmsvej og rullet sletningen af den originale "Ved Broen" tilbage og overført relevante tags til den i stedet)
ianlopez1115 (2017-07-12 12:33:16+00:00): offset used is 9.40; -2.10
eggie (2017-08-08 07:53:38+00:00): Winkelgebieden niet als building yes taggen svp. Hier heeft een mapper het al verbeterd.
Marych_ (2017-07-13 07:24:07+00:00): Добрый день,

почему это
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507008589#map=18/41.27329/69.20711
military?

это обычная проходная наверно?
freeExec (2017-07-17 08:11:25+00:00): Вы слишком много всего удаляете и тоже самое рисуете. Нужно уточнять старое. Иначе вы рискуете, что ваши изменения будут просто отменять.
chillly (2017-07-12 17:17:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM
We only tag each object once. Loughborough University is tagged for the site as a whole. Tagging it on each building makes it look as though there are lots of universities. 

If you have questions please ask.
chillly (2017-07-12 17:18:32+00:00): You really need to remove the univerity from all these buildings. Please stop doing this
user_5359 (2017-07-12 18:29:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset  because you a street node across other streets (picture exists).

One small comment to the other point with name=„Bussiness Name here“. You are welcome to add local business, but on the right way. 
Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
In detail: Please read the pages for shop, craft and office (http://www.openstreetmap.org). 

And at least: Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!

If you need help: You are welcome!
streinger (2017-07-12 14:15:01+00:00): просьба проверить название улицы, может Ростошинская, а не Ростоши по правой стороне дороги, где номера домов 1,3,5,9......
денисл56 (2017-07-13 14:29:28+00:00): Специально смотрел - на табличках "ул.Ростоши"
может они устаревшие, но - что есть
streinger (2017-07-13 16:21:31+00:00): понятно,  раз написано, то пусть останется, только слово улица в название добавить надо, а не просто Ростоши.
Alexander-II (2017-07-13 16:28:22+00:00): А табличка не выглядит, как обломанная с конца? Ростоши[нская] Спрашиваю, потому что мне кажется (но я не уверен), что это не корректно, когда на доме название улицы, которая при этом не проходит рядом с домом. Будет ли этот дом находиться по адресу?
streinger (2017-07-13 16:45:08+00:00): скорее всего таблички старые,  в кладре такой улицы нет, эти дома вроде одни из первых построены и этот район назывался или всё ещё называется старые ростоши.
chillly (2017-07-12 17:19:43+00:00): This is not a university. please stop adding university to all the objects within the area of the university. This is incorrect tagging. 

Are you going to remove these?
SomeoneElse (2017-07-17 15:00:26+00:00): The "water-based hockey pitch university" has been fixed, but there is still a "national throws centre university" at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58404006 .
Olga | Yanosik (2017-09-13 13:04:41+00:00): Cześć, mam zgłoszenie, że w tym 51.8009355, 19.4595428 miejscu jest zakaz skrętu w lewo. Na GSV tu nie ma żadnego przejazdu. W bazie Yanosika również nie notujemy tu przejazdów. Czy to jest nowo wybudowany przejazd czy przeciwnie - został zlikwidowany? Czy masz możliwość sprawdzić w terenie? Pozdrawiam, Olga
user_2092025 (2017-09-24 14:59:21+00:00): Przepraszam, że po czasie.
Jeszcze w wakacje było dobrze naniesione...
Ten łącznik został wybudowany podczas remontu ulicy Inflanckiej (2014), a skręt z niego jest dozwolony tylko dla autobusów i taksówek.
Teraz powinno być dobrze.
Pozdrowienia
Hjart (2017-07-12 13:41:36+00:00): Sådan et led markeres normalt på en node(punkt) på vejen. Jeg har rettet det.
nammala (2017-07-20 06:26:06+00:00): Hi Zaeem12,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have been adding `area=yes` tag fro buildings. Please make sure you give building tags for buildings. Refer wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building.

Regards,
nammala
user_5359 (2017-07-12 18:45:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thank you for adding details to OSM! But you start with a complex thing (like relation and iD). I cleanup the  not necesssary 38 relation :).

If you need help: You are welcome!
Yorvik Prestigitator (2017-07-13 01:45:21+00:00): you might have been replicating the estra tags by mistake - some of your buildings have maxspeed=30 mph and landuse=grass
Jakson Aquino (2017-07-26 10:15:01+00:00): Gledson, você modificou o cruzamento da Rodovia Doutor Mendel Steinbruch com Avenida Parque Sul em Maracanaú? Está faltando um trecho da rodovia e há uma restrição de curva à esquerda, o que, na prática, inviabiliza que sejam calculadas rotas corretamente. Veja:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=mapzen_car&route=-3.87414%2C-38.59473%3B-3.87781%2C-38.59587
chillly (2017-07-18 11:26:26+00:00): Please add comments to your changes as you save them. It helps everyone else understand what the changes are your are making
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-13 11:49:18+00:00): Hi please note that paths should not be named with the name of a route such as Cotswold Way - this is the name of a route, rather than the name of the individual paths making up the route. There is already a relation for the Cotswold Way route and this has many paths as members. Walking, cycling routes (and others) can be seen at waymarkedtrails.org, which uses the OSM data (they are not shown on the standard OSM map).

Regards,
Mike
literan (2017-07-13 12:15:53+00:00): Здравствуйте. У вас тут получилось наложение двух одинаковых землепользований: на полигон https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108124907/history вы накладываете другие полигоны с тем же тегом landuse=allotments - что делать нельзя. Надо оставить или общий полигон, или вот эти отдельные с подписями. И еще - очень плохая практика "прилеплять" полигоны землепользования к дорогам, как это делаете вы (например здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507029638/history#map=16/55.7369/38.3089 ). Границы нужно проводить, как правило, по заборам (ведь асфальт, лежащий на дороге, не входит в СНТ!).
demon_box (2017-07-12 20:43:11+00:00): ciao benvenuto! 
scusa ma qui dove l'hai mappata non c'è nessuna banca...
puoi cortesemente rimuoverla?
grazie
oormilavinod (2017-07-13 05:13:15+00:00): hey, I-Post San Vito, welcome to OSM, I just noticed that you have added a feature over a multi-polygon and tagged it natural : water. this has caused the feature to break. please add value to the map. I have deleted the feature have a great day
Alexey Vazhnov (2017-07-12 19:35:59+00:00): Для «Добавление информации» в этой правке слишком много удалений…
chnav (2017-07-15 17:07:15+00:00): Восстановил некоторые удалённые газоны., автор умудрился налепить оверлапов т.е. например roundabout и поверх него газон. Вернул их назад.
Macsico (2017-07-20 08:46:17+00:00): Weg ist nicht geschlossen, kein Zaun vorhanden! Bin da soeben lang gelaufen und fahre dort 2x die Woche mit dem Fahrrad durch.
Bitte Änderung zurücknehmen, danke.
FloWil (2017-07-20 09:35:08+00:00): Tschuldigung - einen "Weg" verrutscht :-)
Ich wollte (und habe) den Weg in der Sportanlage gemeint, da gibt es leider einen Zaun - und und verschlossenes Tor - wie jetzt eingetragen.
Christophe Mathieu (2018-01-13 09:29:11+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/50233335
nikospag (2019-05-17 23:00:10+00:00): I cant understand why the hell you deleted the names from bus stop positions here in Greece. Why you people don't read the wiki?
tuxayo (2019-08-17 17:33:41+00:00): Bonjour, Il semble que vous avez mit "Sergic Marseille" au millieu de nulle part, avez-vous une position plus précise?
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2019-08-19 07:02:06+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement, son positionnement n'est pas du tout correct. Je l'ai repositionné, merci pour votre signalement. Cordialement
SafwatHalaby_bot (2017-07-12 15:40:57+00:00): Total names copies: 45
Total name to name:en: 6
Total name:he to name: 0
Total name to name:he: 35
Total name:ar to name: 0
Total name to name:ar: 4
Whitespace fixes: 0
Total autofix attempts: 586
Total autofix success: 372
Total autofix fail: 214
SafwatHalaby_bot (2017-07-12 15:53:52+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50234092
XY22 (2017-07-14 16:36:11+00:00): Hallo MrWebber,
du hast die Brücke und die Auffahrten bei der Kreuzung B 51 / K 112 doppelt eingetragen.
MrWebber (2017-07-19 08:53:07+00:00): Ok, schon korrigiert. War wohl ein Anzeigefehler!
Pocokkifli (2017-07-12 15:57:56+00:00): Kieg.: Ostffyasszonyfa Zalaszentiván helyett
L'imaginaire (2017-11-18 21:32:37+00:00): Knooppunt staat nu op nieuwe locatie (kruispunt meer naar oosten, zie changeset 53911685), routes zouden nog eens moeten gecheckt worden.
Polarbear-repair (2017-07-13 10:43:44+00:00): Full revert in 50254392. see reasons in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50236843
RemiBovard (2017-08-14 15:30:01+00:00): Do you know that mapnv.ch use cantonal data for the buildings, source which is not compatible with OSM data...
imagoiq (2017-08-14 16:12:54+00:00): Why ?

I hope that you are less aggressive and antipathetic with other users here. I don't think you are helping the openstreetmap community with such comment. 

May I advise as well to comment next time with a full explanation of your thinking and therefore really helping other members and their failures ? Other members likewise beginners like me.

Not sure what your incentive is with your comment, other than discourage people from trying to edit openstreetmap. Switzerland is not the most developed western country in osm and here, editors are kind of rare these days. You should take care of them, help them and at least try to have a bit of empathy.

But it's only my perspective and you may disagree.
RemiBovard (2017-08-15 06:34:20+00:00): Hi StreetAv,
I'm sorry if I hurt you with my comment, be sure that it was not my intention to be rude with you. It was a short text but not aggressive, my apologies if you received it like that.
Yes, I think I'm helping the OSM community with my warning. Even if like you say that mappers are rare today (what are your sources?), it is not a reason to use copyrighted data. Should I remember you that "OSM contributors are reminded never to add data from any copyrighted sources (e.g. Google Maps or printed maps) without explicit permission from the copyright holders." [1] and like I said before, mapnv.ch is using cantonal data for the buildings [2].
So my point here is not to discourage members to add content to the map but to avoid that mappers use uncompatible data for mapping.
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright/en
[2] https://www.asitvd.ch/chercher/geoservices/fond-de-plan-asit-vd.html
imagoiq (2017-08-15 06:51:06+00:00): ok
imagico (2017-07-18 17:09:03+00:00): Hello palimpadum,
not sure if you are aware that you are refining glacier mapping here based on images which are probably older than the ones these were originally mapped from three years ago and which are partly off by more than 100m.
grin (2017-07-13 16:50:40+00:00): What is the source of the info?
landfahrer (2017-07-14 08:44:12+00:00): the source is http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
grin (2017-07-14 11:45:27+00:00): Turned out that I was misread the related edits as a deletion and revert, while it's only been a name change. Sorry for bothering. Thanks for fixing the ring!
chillly (2017-07-12 18:21:32+00:00): Just what is this? Is this some kind of incomplete edit, or some advertising spam?
Polarbear-repair (2017-07-13 10:43:36+00:00): Full revert in 50254392. see reasons in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50236843
Polarbear-repair (2017-07-13 10:41:14+00:00): clemensen, du warst eindringlich geben worden, deine Arbeit an OSM ruhen zu lassen.

Stattdessen eröffnest du einen Sockenpuppenaccount nach dem anderen ( 16356Ahr / wbmstr / und nun clemensen). Der Data Working Group liegen inzwischen technische Beweise vor, dass es sich nicht um verschiedene Nutzer handeln kann.

Da wir ja inzwischen wissen, dass deine Änderungen an Kirchen aus einem kirchlichen Verzeichnis stammen, das nicht vom Urheber schriftlich zur Verwendung in OSM freigegebenen wurde, reicht es auch nicht, nun unspezifisch ungenannte Wikis, ungenannte Webseiten oder "diverse Publikationen" als Quelle anzugeben. Es verstösst gegen die Importrichtlinien in OSM, und durch deine Editier-Kriege mit der DWG hast du das Vertrauen in dein "Hintergrundwissen" verspielt.  

Immer noch nicht hast du verstanden, dass ein Objekt auch mehrere gebräuchliche Namen haben kann.

Auch bist du bei deiner fehlerhaften  Interpretation von Luftbildern nicht lernfähig und hast way 192121304 unrichtig vergrössert. 

Auch verschiebst du weiterhin willkürlich und grundlos Place-Nodes von Orten.

Du arbeitest GEGEN eine community von über einer Million Usern. Das ist fruchtlos. 

Full revert in 50254392.
Polarbear-repair (2017-07-13 10:47:04+00:00): s/geben/gebeten/
clemensen (2017-07-13 12:09:03+00:00): Ih benütze keine kirchl. Verzeichnisse!
clemensen (2017-07-13 12:14:51+00:00): Außerdem bin ich mir nicht sicher, dass du für JEDES deiner ediditierten Objekte eine genaue Quellenangabe eingibst. Außerdem arbeite ich für die Verbesserungen dieses Projektes!
Piskvor (2017-07-13 12:00:42+00:00): Hello/ahoj,
thank you for the effort; unfortunately, mapy.cz and firmy.cz do not have a compatible license to OSM, and therefore it is not possible to accept data from these sources. I'm afraid this changeset will need to be reverted.
Piskvor (2017-07-13 12:12:49+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50256589

Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Beginners_Guide_1.1 for some tips on data sources.
eggie (2017-07-12 22:44:51+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-12 22:57:04+00:00): Ben je er zeker van dat het water is, want op oude kaarten staat het steeds als een stuk heide?
eggie (2017-07-13 08:04:41+00:00): Via PB contact gehad. 
Het is dus water met en andere vorm. Bij de import een aantal jaren geleden zijn de stukken heide allemaal als gras geïmporteerd. Dat zal dan na survey nog veranderd kunnen worden.
Wanneer je hier reageert begrijpen collegamappers ook dat je het begrepen hebt.
Onderin op de link klikken in je reguliere mail en dan "aanmelden" om mee te praten.  Dus inloggen.
Succes..
wambacher (2017-07-13 11:13:49+00:00): Hi, i'm not shure if your changes of name:zh are ok, 

BUT NEVER EVER remove boundary=administrative from any admin boundary! 
You did this for Belarus and Falkland Islands in this changeset.
Please work more carefull.

Regards
walter 

Fixes:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50254951

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50255079