piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
user_5359 (2022-11-20 20:43:50+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo: Use is_in:country instead of is:in_country. By the way: It is better to use the key is_in:country_code=UG, because then there are no problems with different spellings of the country name. I will make the corrections accordingly.
archie (2022-11-19 18:22:37+00:00): Hej,

du har lagt in dubbla placenames för Nordhag (hamlet), dels som node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7483292881), dels som area - closed way - (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115540760).

Förutom att placenamne nu finns dublerad är problemet att vi brukar sätta placenames på noder eftersom gränsen för det du uppger som hamlet inte finns definerat. Gränsen är obestämd och vid sådant förhållande sklla placename sättas på en nod.
archie (2022-11-19 18:32:18+00:00): Jag har raderat closed way för Nordhag samt för Stället. Observera att boundary-taggen är till endast för administrativa gränser. Båda områden representeras redan av noder med respektive place-name. Det rörde sig avseende de raderade objekt med andra ord om dubbletter.
traveleditor (2022-11-20 19:18:37+00:00): Tack, det kommer inte att hända igen.
archie (2022-11-21 00:29:37+00:00): Det är lätt att missa att ortnamnet redan finns. Jag har ett script som visar ortnamn och eventuellt namn på landuse som   etiketter på kartan. Då ser man snabbt om något namn på något ställe är dubblerat. Det ser förresten fint och städat ut i Kungälvs kommun; inga ytterligare dubbleringar.
Olyon (2022-11-20 18:39:27+00:00): Hello,
Be careful when you cut ways, you must have loaded in JOSM the relations that use this way otherwise the relation will be broken. Here, several administrative relations were no longer closed after your modifications (relation of Tanzania, Mozambique, Cabo Delgado Province...).
I corrected these errors.

You use humdata.org for source but I don't think the license allows these additions in OSM.
Ruben Morgado (2022-11-20 20:07:23+00:00): Olyon,

Thanks for the note and corrections. I will be more careful in the future and load anything thing that I cut.
bkil (2022-11-30 17:36:01+00:00): Szeretnénk kérni, hogy legyen a leszúrt entitásokon elsődleges funkció is (pl. shop=supermarket ) különben nem fogják a felhasználók megtalálni.
bkil (2022-11-30 17:34:27+00:00): Szeretnénk kérni, hogy legyen a leszúrt entitásokon elsődleges funkció is (ez esetben: amenity=car_wash ) különben nem fogják a felhasználók megtalálni.
euroPathfinder (2022-11-20 07:49:22+00:00): Guten Morgen hell_mapper,
bitte arbeite in Fällen wie diesen mit Lifecycle Prefix sodass Mapper für den Fall dass die Brücke wieder errichtet wird auf die Historie zugreifen können. In diesem Fall wäre wohl das demolished: prefix geeignet: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Viele Grüße und ein schönes Wochenende!
euroPathfinder
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129130916
kartler175 (2022-11-20 10:12:21+00:00): Wirklich besser ? 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.87062&lat=48.02241&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
DUGA (2022-12-24 02:20:28+00:00): Please use PEMA imagery to draw everything in Sus County.
martinst (2022-11-19 18:36:38+00:00): Hallo Axel,
eine Brücke einfügen geht ganz einfach: Den Weg am Beginn und Ende der Brücke auftrennen, Brückenwegstück mit bridge=yes versehen.
Wenn noch was unklar ist gerne rückfragen.
Gruß Martin
eggie (2022-11-19 17:26:53+00:00): Dag Tim..

Elk begin is lastig..  Het is ongebruikelijk om aan alle wegen oneway=no toe te voegen.
Dat doe je alleen als je bang bent dat een andere mapper oneway=yes gaat toevoegen. Bv aan een tweerichting -parallelfietspad- of fiersrotonde. 

MVG
eggie
Tim_runner (2022-11-19 19:10:47+00:00): Bedankt voor je hulp!
Jillis inactivE (2022-11-19 17:38:14+00:00): Waarom heb je deze op private access gezet, Martin? Veldweg was een paar weken geleden vrij betreedbaar, tussen de rotsblokken bij de holle weg door.
Jillis inactivE (2022-11-19 17:43:49+00:00): En ook een stuk weggehaald, op basis waarvan is dat?
Martin Borsje (2022-11-19 18:39:52+00:00): OP basis van zeer recente luchtfoto
Martin Borsje (2022-11-19 18:44:40+00:00): Stond daar niet een hek en een verbodsbord dan? Volgens mij is de groeve zeker nog niet vrij betreedbaar.
Jillis inactivE (2022-11-19 19:07:44+00:00): Zeker geen hek of bord meer, er is toch duidelijk een stukje opengesteld. 
Nou nodigt het vervolg van de zandweg niet uit tot verder betreden, maar er staat nergens dat t niet mag of kan...
Martin Borsje (2022-11-26 12:14:37+00:00): Zie mijn wijzigingen :)
ivanbranco (2022-11-19 17:16:14+00:00): this was supposed to be a small changeset in Krakow, apparently I edited something in my hometown as well by mistake. I'm gonna fix it, sorry for the big changeset area!
hoserab (2022-11-21 21:07:17+00:00): Hi Josh,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! I'm just writing to give you a couple pointers about your edit here. First of all you created a way outlining a bunker on the golf course, but you tagged it as "natural=beach". That tag is for where there is a naturally-occurring beach along a waterway, not a bunker. A golf bunker has its own tagging, "golf=bunker". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf=bunker and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=golf_course for more info.

You also added a name to the bunker, calling it "bunker". You don't need to do this, and really, you don't *want* to do this. Name tagging should only contain the name of the feature, not a description of it. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only.  You don't need to describe the feature like this using "name=bunker" because, 1) "golf=bunker" already means it is a golf course bunker, and 2) it's not *named* "bunker", it *is* a bunker. :)

If you're ever not sure about how to tag a feature the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org) has lots of info.

Thanks again for your contributions!
NorthCrab (2022-11-19 21:56:08+00:00): Witaj,

tag opening_hours ma standardowy format którym należy się posługiwać. opisy w stylu "Czynne w swzonie letnim" są niepoprawne.

Więcej informacji na wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-06 17:16:59+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10202328733/history has amenity = fixme that was added in this edit
What kind of object is here? Is it a shop? What kind of a shop? (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop )
DaveF (2022-11-20 11:53:31+00:00): The western most steps do not join the road.

Why have you given platform 2 a ref of 5?
DaveF (2022-11-20 12:12:59+00:00): This edit looks like vandalism & will be redacted.
NorthCrab (2022-11-19 21:54:36+00:00): Ta "zmiana nazwy" usunęła większość informacji na temat karczmy oraz adres budynku. Jeśli chciałeś usunąć punkt to pozostaw tagi adresowe bez zmian jeśli przypisane one są do konkretnego budynku.
NorthCrab (2022-11-19 21:57:23+00:00): Hello,
Please avoid adding "ulica"=="street" to street names. In this case "Ulica Szpitalna" should be simply "Szpitalna".
I will correct this issue.
DaveF (2022-11-20 11:43:39+00:00): Hi
Could you explain the purpose of your edits?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Langlaeufer (2023-05-31 13:13:17+00:00): Hi, bist du dir sicher mit der Einbahnstraße in der verkehrsberuhigten Platanenstraße?
osmidal (2024-02-05 13:36:32+00:00): "tourism=camp_site" is for official campsites only.

I cannot find any here.

Can you provide reference? Add the "operator="-tag and add the name of the operator, and add opening hours/ seasons, and if applicable add a "website=" tag.

If it is not an official camping spot but just your personal bookmark of a place for wild camping, then please remove the item.

Regards!
adrianojbr (2022-11-20 04:43:35+00:00): Olá, Caconog!

As imagens da Maxar parecem estar mais atualizadas nessa região.

Abraço!
Adamant1 (2022-12-06 09:21:32+00:00): Hi there. Can you explain what the deal with the payment types here is? Like do people pay with their shoes, a ball, or what?
Glassman (2022-11-21 18:54:44+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129133829
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
JochenB (2023-05-01 23:12:47+00:00): Hallo Öreg,

du hast vor ca. 5 Monaten in Grubschütz die Draninagegräben von waterway=ditch auf drain geändert, siehe z.B. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219971057

Das ist nicht korrekt denn waterway=drain sind offene Abwasserkanäle, keine Entwässerungsgräben.

Ich habe das auch viele Jahre falsch gemacht weil ich dachte mit "drain" ist "Drainage" gemeint. Ist es aber nicht. 

Ich hab das wieder geändert wollte dich nur darüber informieren.

Viele Grüße,
Jochen
4004 (2022-12-07 14:49:47+00:00): Добры дзень, а чаму Падкрыжацкую абрэзалi? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615360748
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-11-20 05:35:29+00:00): أستاذنا العزيز وضحنا لكم أكثر من مره إن هذا المكان والصور الفضائية لا تتطابق مع الذي تقوم بادخاله، نرجوا منكم عدم تغييره
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:00:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
eggie (2022-11-19 19:12:12+00:00): Dag Tim .. Je zou de tagging kunnen uitbreiden.
Zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

Vooral voor wie is het bedoeld.. Je hebt immers ook overal oplaadpunten voor e bikes. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-19 20:31:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
NorthCrab (2022-11-21 19:26:53+00:00): Hej, sorry że na changeset ale ta notka czeka na twoją odpowiedź: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2926014
NorthCrab (2022-11-19 21:50:28+00:00): Hello, you have requested a review.

All I can say that in cases where the street has no name, addr:place is the best key to use and it's also fine if you combine it with addr:city (both may have have the same value).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:place
NorthCrab (2022-11-19 21:50:53+00:00): You didn't make any errors, I am saying this just to inform you.
SekeRob (2022-11-22 14:24:55+00:00): Hi.

You used deprecated tags!

Please fix.
Arctic gnome (2022-11-25 16:52:10+00:00): Which tags are deprecated?
SekeRob (2022-11-25 17:21:09+00:00): Well, when you were about to save your change set you had a warning of 5 per the summary above. I only noticed because this global edit set crow barred itself into my little Italy corner change set history view and opened it to see if it affected my regular area of mapping, said corner. Did not, so I FYI'd you on the notice and closed. The probability is that if you open up your personal Osmose and OSMI problems listing, they will include these. E.g today my list, which is short and kept short includes: "The tag `landuse=reservoir` is deprecated in favour of `natural=water`+ `water=reservoir`", so I fix that in a minute.

The summary of the issues of items you touched you find at https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?Arctic%20gnome

Anyway, you commented in the CS 'time zones', so best guess it is related to those tags.

ciao
bxl-forever (2022-11-20 21:11:35+00:00): Hello,

Would you please be so kind and use proper changeset comments to describe what you are doing?
"changed", "added"… provide no real information.

It looks like you have been changing the highway type of some roads.
I am a bit puzzled about this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/381113307/history → you changed a highway=pedestrian into highway=unclassified, but the street still has a—probably useless—huge list of access tags, making it impossible to route properly (whatever the highway type, only pedestrians will be allowed to use it, according to the current tags in the database; judging by the changeset comment here, restricting access to pedestrians was deliberate https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35420351).  This is an example of why it is important to document changesets properly.

This is also a problem here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115576090
It looks like pedestrian routing was broken. Good point for using a proper footway connector but now you’ve broken cycleway routing (in both directions) and invalidated cycle relations.  Was this intended?
SustainableMobile (2022-11-30 16:33:26+00:00): The intention was to change the bicycle lane into a footpath as the street became a cycling street
bxl-forever (2022-12-01 12:45:57+00:00): You are talking about this one, right: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23329856
Adding cyclestreet=yes is fine, I had no problem with that.  But since you used oneway=yes with no additional tags, it means that cycling is only allowed in the same direction as motor traffic, with NO contraflow (and no more cycle track on the side).
If cycling is allowed on the road in both directions, we must add oneway:bicycle=no.
I haven’t been in this area recently, I don’t know what road signs have been installed here.  If you can describe it, we’ll know how to repair the map.

It would be appreciated if you would also answer the main part of my comment, about *other* roads you changed in the same upload.  I provided you the direct links to some of the suspicious objects.

Thanks.
SustainableMobile (2022-12-08 09:49:15+00:00): This is the situation: https://ibb.co/ySCCznr. The cycle path became a foot path
abakus_uploader (2022-11-19 23:31:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
MxxCon (2022-11-22 21:25:21+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you tag some of these curb as not having tactile pavings when they are clearly visible from the satellite imagery, and would be on the ground while you were surveying?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129136957
Squ_are (2022-11-22 21:36:02+00:00): Hi. Could you please specify which curb you are referring to?

As far as I can tell and remember it was only the NW corner of W 169 and Fort Washington Ave that had curbs with tactile pavings. 

I am rather new to editing these tags, so it is possible that I have done some mistake, in which case I am sorry
MxxCon (2022-11-22 21:44:25+00:00): That is correct. On the NW corner of FWA and W169 they are grey/blue.
But also on the SE corner of FWA and W170 they are bright red.

Such information is important for the navigation apps for visually impaired people. Accurate tags of those tactile plates helps people with low/no vision better orient themselves.
Squ_are (2022-11-22 22:55:37+00:00): Thank you for correcting the error. I see tactile paving at W 170 and FWA now too.
StC (2022-12-03 10:39:41+00:00): Bonjour,

cette mise à jour a cassé deux relations représentant des itinéraires de randonnée partant de la mairie. Les orthophotos disponibles ne me permettent pas de réparer. Avez-vous le moyen de le faire ?
mga_geo (2022-12-02 06:12:03+00:00): Bonjour,
Sur les horaires de la ligne 21, l'arrêt "Guingamp" ne figure pas.
Vous êtes sur ?
Marc
rubensd (2022-12-07 18:17:43+00:00): Hola.
Te escribo porque he modificado la rotonda, para corregir algunos de los cambios que has hecho.
Está más detallado en el siguiente enlace:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74446987
También te he mandado un mensaje con algo más de información.
NorthCrab (2022-11-20 19:20:35+00:00): Na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115579661/history brakuje uwzględnienia ruchu rowerowego. samo segregated=yes nie wystarczy.
outref (2022-11-21 11:17:19+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi, już poprawione!
Cristoffs (2022-11-24 16:08:01+00:00): You marked the roads as barriers, pay attention to that next time
Josef73 (2023-03-11 12:35:04+00:00): Hello, can you please check the value of the tag opening_hours? Thanks
Minh Nguyen (2022-12-06 01:09:44+00:00): Hi, please refrain from changing streets and parking lot aisles into golf cart paths. OpenStreetMap needs to remain usable to the general public, not just golfers. The changes in this changeset could have prevented some people from getting routes to this neighborhood by car, or prevented delivery services from reaching its residents.

To indicate that golf carts are allowed on an ordinary street, expand the “Tags” section in the left sidebar and add a new tag: “golf_cart” on the left side, and “yes” on the right side.

Changeset 129761521 restores the streets around Beckett Ridge. If you have any questions about how to edit OSM, please don’t hesitate to ask me or join the chatroom at slack.openstreetmap.us for help from the broader community of mappers.
Max-Kritic (2022-11-22 17:24:58+00:00): Bon suivi. Pour Arras, les travaux sont pas finis. Pour Boulogne, l'appel d'offre n'est pas lancé.
gendy54 (2022-11-22 17:29:16+00:00): Merci.
Merci de l'info. N'hésite pas à mettre des notes avec le hashtag #pompiers, ca me permet de les retrouver facilement.
Max-Kritic (2022-11-24 18:19:50+00:00): #pompiers, c'est pour OSM ou Facebook ? 
Pour ton info : Les casernes d'Arras et de Boulogne sont/seront construits par le Département du Pas-de-Calais lui-même. Par contre les CIS de Lens et Longuenesse ont été construits directement par le SDIS62, naturellement avec une aide financière du Département. La différence dans les marchés publics, c'est qu'il y a des casernes avec de la clause sociale et d'autres pas.
gendy54 (2022-11-24 18:23:05+00:00): Pour OSM, on peut retrouver facilement avec OSMCha.
user_17724595 (2022-11-25 20:18:52+00:00): .
scai (2023-06-07 06:27:53+00:00): Hallo Badabuga,

wenn du Gehwege separat einzeichnest, dann bitte auch die sidewalk-Tags an der zugehörigen Straße entsprechend setzen oder aktualisisieren. Aus sidewalk=both muss dann sidewalk=separate werden, aus sidewalk:right=yes muss sidewalk:right=separate werden etc. Andernfalls sind die Gehwege in den Daten doppelt vorhanden.
ivanbranco (2022-11-19 21:50:24+00:00): Hi,

the image=* tag is for images depicting the object, not for logos.

You changed internet access tag from wlan to a more generic =yes, why so?

The telegram contact doesn't seem to work anymore.

The description is: "Manufacturer of wood industries" (instagram also refence to wood stuff), while the object is tagged as a supermarket, while the website looks like a electronic online shop. What's really this place?

You added 40 (!!) payment methods, are those methods all really available?
Patr1k_P (2022-11-23 11:55:24+00:00): footway sa pouziva hlavne v mestach, ci obciach kde je kvalitny asfaltovy chodnik...ak je to niekde v lese alebo mimo obec, pouzite radsej path

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footway
Geim (2022-11-19 21:49:02+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Geen voetpad te zien: https://goo.gl/maps/4Bkhi4VN7JAFNYxq9 en https://goo.gl/maps/ZiRqTmsRHFZwwqi66
eggie (2022-11-19 22:02:04+00:00): Hoi.. wil jij het verwijderen.. Heb mn comp net ingeklapt.. Anders haal ik het morgen wel even weg.
Groet
Eggie
eggie (2022-11-20 06:37:29+00:00): Pad verwijderd..  Lijn zonder tags ook maar weggelaten. 
Inderdaad geen pad.
Geim (2022-11-20 08:55:59+00:00): Sorry, had je eerste bericht niet op tijd gelezen. Maarre top!
eggie (2022-11-20 09:04:24+00:00): Had nog even met obliek gekeken.
De voorgaande tagging maar verwijderd. Dat zet iemand op het verkeerde been.
Groet
Eggie
collect (2022-11-20 00:58:36+00:00): 不要用1这么种没意义的描述
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hans:Good_changeset_comments
gscholz (2022-11-22 09:22:28+00:00): Hi 4eversad,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=28.96572&lat=40.19115&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=129139366

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.

I have reverted it to fix those issues.

Before you continue mapping you may like to read the beginners guide:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Kind regards
Guido
gurglypipe (2022-11-21 08:56:00+00:00): Heya. What was the reasoning behind changing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71189144 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158237527 to highway=bridleway from highway=track? :)

As I remember it, these are physically tracks on the ground, even if motorised access is private. imo highway=bridleway is never really appropriate because it doesn’t describe what’s physically on the ground, only its legal status, and that’s already given by designation=public_bridleway and foot=designated horse=designated.

I’d be interested to learn about your interpretation of the tags. Hope you had a good walk :)