piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DoodleBob (2016-11-08 22:57:05+00:00): Hola,

Lo siento por la confusión que se originó en mis ediciones. Quería limpiar la geometría y las intersecciones alrededor de la ciudad. Me di cuenta de Buenos Aires tiene una serie de cuestiones relativas a las intersecciones, la alineación de las carreteras y la direccionalidad de las vías. Los caminos tienden a tener otros objetos asociados con ellos, que a su debido tiempo, deben ser reparados también.

Como OSM es una comunidad de código abierto y voluntario como Wikipedia quería hacer cambios en áreas donde vi algo que faltaba o algo incorrecto. No estoy tratando de hacer ediciones malintencionadas en Buenos Aires, sino más bien corregir algunos datos que deberían haber sido alterados antes de agregar las relaciones, etc. Lamento tener que romper las relaciones de autobús. Seré más cuidadoso.

El mapa de calor de Strava hace un gran trabajo de mostrar los cambios de geometría en un camino en comparación con imágenes. Tiendo a usar datos abiertos del gobierno y Strava al actualizar la geometría de camino y las intersecciones. ¿Puede señalar un área donde una carretera que curva no debe ser curvada? Strava fue discutido recientemente aquí: https: //forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php? Id = 56193. Strava recoge datos de GPS de los teléfonos de los usuarios incluso mientras están conduciendo si han dado el permiso de la aplicación, no sólo senderos para bicicletas. 

Strava ofrece una gran cantidad de trazas precisas GPS para OSM y se puede encontrar como una capa de imágenes dentro de JOSM que es muy útil cuando las imágenes sat no está alineado con la realidad (lo que sucede con bastante frecuencia) para ayudar con las compensaciones correctivas.

Por favor, dime saber lo que piensas sobre esta estrategia. Creo que bueno discutir diferentes enfoques y métodos en OSM!

Muchas gracias.
AgusQui (2016-11-10 02:56:49+00:00): Arenales entre Esmeralda y Maipú son dos tramos rectos no hay curva, buscalo en Street View para comprobar, Avenida Castillo no tiene calzada dividida y no tiene la curva que le hisciste en la interseccion con Comodoro Py, esas curvas aparecen en Strava porque son los radios de giro que hacen los ciclistas en una avenida que es muy ancha. Ése es el problema con tus ediciones, no debes tomar Strava como unica herramienta para alinear calles, debes usar Strava, trazas gpx de OSM, o trazas propias para alinear las imagenes satelitales, y recien ahí ponerse a editar, desde las satelitales alineadas, y si moves calles debes mover TODO, porque sino dejas todo el mapa peor que antes como lo esta ahora, hay zonas que las dejaste completamente descolocadas con el resto de los elementos dibujados.
Por otro lado tambien veo que inventastes cruces extraños, por ejemplo en Libertador y Ramos Mejia agregaste 3 "islas" que no existen para nada, recuerda que las vias se separan solo si existe un elemento fisico separador entre ellas.
Por favor si te surgen dudas consulta y tratá de realinear todos los elementos que quedaron mal, usa las satelitales alineadas, y recorda que Strava lo usan principalmente los ciclistas, los cuales generalmente van por un lado de la calle, no por el medio lo que puede generar que las lineas que veas esten corridas hacia un lado de la realidad.
BladeTC (2016-11-14 19:07:18+00:00): Fontes de prórpio conhecimento adicione a tag "source=survey" ou "source:name=survey".
DavidKewley (2016-10-28 22:32:52+00:00): Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Is this a beauty shop business named "home"? That is how it shows up in the map everyone in the world sees. If instead this is a business with a business name, it'd be best to change the name to how it is publicly known. If it is just your  private home, it'd be best to remove the name and the shop=beauty tag. Hope that helps, --David
DavidKewley (2016-12-25 23:28:55+00:00): I have remoed the name "home" from this location, but otherwise leaving it, on the assumption that the other tags may be accurate.
user_5359 (2016-11-02 20:01:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Pleasse define „all weeks“ Did you mean Mo-Sa or all days Mo-Su. For details see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Carnildo (2016-10-28 03:32:33+00:00): The classification of places is based on their size, not on the official name.  That said, I agree that Pullman is probably large enough to be classified as a city rather than a town.
geohacker (2016-10-28 04:01:43+00:00): Hey afonin, in this changeset looks like you removed name of a way - https://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#43235013/way/158862234. Just wanted to make sure this wasn't accidental. Thank you! :)
afnxn (2017-03-04 08:11:56+00:00): no, it's not accidental
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
skorasaurus (2016-10-28 20:09:06+00:00): 
Hi, 

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your edits! 

I just wanted to let you know about a couple things. 

There was a feature that you deleted and later readded on the map, but you forgot to add the tags on the new building you drew. 

(the Coastal Taco - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/416156730/history was deleted eand you added a new building very close to the deleted one and didn't add the information about Coastal Taco back to your new building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/449791884). 

If you need any help with mapping or have any questions, feel free to contact me :) 

Regards, 
Will, a Clevelander.
Carnildo (2016-10-28 07:35:20+00:00): Since when has Pinecroft Natural Area Preserve been a military area?
Howpper (2016-10-28 21:57:42+00:00): I did this because the area is not open to the public, and it was meant to represent a restricted area.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-11-02 19:26:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:51:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-11-02 19:16:37+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-10-29 22:44:51+00:00): Co to za bezsensowna zmiana w adresacji?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-11-02 19:07:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the coorection of your entry!
user_5359 (2016-11-01 17:18:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did You see the second tattoo shop in the same building https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/471774452/history ? Does this business still exist?
user_5359 (2016-11-01 17:08:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have merge your both entries.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 17:00:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the building with an other hotel name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/224697381 ? What is the actual hotel name?

If you need help: You are welcome!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-11-01 16:54:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-01 16:54:15+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-01 07:40:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .

One short question: Exists the street 325th Avenue (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/18163668) ?
user_5359 (2016-10-31 10:59:44+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-31 10:12:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-10-31 10:03:44+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-10-31 10:03:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-31 10:01:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
-karlos- (2017-07-13 20:42:37+00:00): osmgo.org: ColourMaterial unknown hex color
#d3coa2, way 71503741
#fuede6,217693274
#fOd198,217693278
user_5359 (2016-10-31 10:00:44+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-31 09:59:56+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
EneaSuper (2016-10-28 18:46:25+00:00): Ciao, ottimo lavoro ma presta attenzione alle maiuscole :)
ernestoandolfi (2016-10-28 20:25:31+00:00): Grazie. In che senso? Che ne metto troppe, troppo poche o che le sbaglio? Avevo letto in wiki di mettere solo la prima lettera come maiuscola a meno che non ci siano nomi propri. Di solito faccio cosi. Dici che si potrebbe fare diversamente? Un saluto, ciao.
EneaSuper (2016-10-29 09:45:46+00:00): Ad esempio, il nome "Associazione anziani oggi - argento vivo" andrebbe scritto come "Associazione Anziani Oggi - Argento Vivo" proprio come sul loro sito Web:
http://www.anzianioggi.altervista.org/

Sta a te prestare attenzione alle maiuscole in base a dove devono essere applicate :)
ernestoandolfi (2016-10-30 21:10:09+00:00): Hai ragione, mi sono confuso con le indicazioni per scrivere gli indirizzi. Appena ho 10 minuti correggo. Poi ci sarebbe da mettere l'accesso ai Vigili e all'ATS che è allo stesso livello di corso Firenze e quindi ha un livello superiore della pedonale  che passa intorno alla Villa (che hai modificato per ultimo tu e ha layer 1 sottointeso) e ancora sopra alla funicolare che ha layer -1. 
Al di là che dalle foto aeree si vede male, io potre anche disgnarli ma come faccio con i livelli? Un caro saluto, ciao.
EneaSuper (2016-10-31 09:47:42+00:00): Per i livelli bella domanda: se ci sono diversi accessi posizionati su altezze diverse rispetto a quello della strada o di altri percorsi come da te indicato bisogna inserirli correttamente. Per esempio, quello su Corso Firenze andrebbe indicato senza livello, quello dai giardini con layer=1, mentre quello dalla funicolare con layer=-1 (sempre che non mi sia confuso leggendo la tua spiegazione). La cosa migliore è una verifica sul posto, spero comunque di essermi spiegato a dovere :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-10-31 09:48:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-31 09:46:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-10-31 09:43:03+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-31 09:42:23+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-31 09:41:36+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-31 09:40:46+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Владимир К (2016-10-28 10:12:32+00:00): Спасибо за внесение данных. Улицы надо писать со статусной частью: Толпыгинская улица. Покрытие надо писать не по-русски, а как написано в документации, в данном случае asphalt
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
user_5359 (2016-10-31 09:43:46+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
manoharuss (2016-10-28 10:50:02+00:00): Hi Lourence,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed that there are buildings that are crossing highways. I have checked the tms layer you have used and it seems the previously traced roads do not align with the imagery like the buildings you have traced. Can you align the roads as well?
 Feel free to reply and let me know.
Best,
Manohar
letihu (2017-01-27 11:05:15+00:00): Auch wenn die Straßen noch im Bau sind, bitte immer schön miteinander verbinden.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4209236955/history
Marych_ (2017-04-29 16:09:22+00:00): Подскажите пожалуйста
что это за дорога ГАЗ ?
Uzbek Traveller (2017-05-01 04:49:08+00:00): Около кратера Газдагана, находится посёлок Газ. Это дорога к нему.
user_5359 (2016-10-30 13:42:29+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
letihu (2016-10-30 12:57:41+00:00): Warum ist hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/138708169/history
denn alles entfernt worden?
Steht das Gebäude nicht mehr?
juangdse (2016-10-30 14:30:53+00:00): ich hatte fälschlicherweise den building tag entfernt.  Ist jetzt korrigiert.
Alecs01 (2016-10-29 14:51:35+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, can you explain which kind of attraction is this one? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4467654533
user_5359 (2016-10-30 13:40:53+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
andygol (2016-10-28 12:58:52+00:00): Доброго дня, mike140!

Це дуже добре, що ви виправляєте помилки в даних ОСМ використовуючи to-fix!👍🏻

Від себе прошу вас надсилати ваші зміни на сервер частіше та по можливості уникати таких "великих", як цей (що покривають маже весь світ), наборів змін.
user_5359 (2016-10-30 13:39:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-30 13:38:58+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
pesec (2016-10-28 10:53:37+00:00): https://youtu.be/x3HB_-Lym24
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
Sanniu (2017-02-08 09:10:06+00:00): Way: 449855015 - should it be part of emergency road or it's a footway only?
zstadler (2017-03-26 13:16:28+00:00): Ways 380785433, 449855015 have no tags. What are they?
Fabian Adelio (2016-10-29 07:10:22+00:00): Mike lagi d mana skrg
user_5359 (2016-10-29 16:22:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-29 16:22:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
kempabub (2024-02-28 08:28:47+00:00): Weg 334733711

Please remove the footpath - this is private property and unfortunately people keep walking along the lake thinking it is public. Thank you.