piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:38:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:38:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:39:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:38:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
eggie (2019-03-28 12:35:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

name=  is de officiele naam. name:nl wordt alleen gebruikt nuiten Nederland en in de provincie Friesland.
name:nl kan dus weg.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-28 12:37:24+00:00): Probeer svp op de adresnode bij te taggen en de aard van het bedrijf ook bij te voegen.. Bv office=it
Dan zal de naam ook renderen. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-28 12:50:03+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode.
office=it en website toegevoegd
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-04 21:53:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 68900506 where the changeset comment is: Following discussions with the French community (and no reply to complaints), reverting some dubious edits in FRance. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2650 et al
marczoutendijk (2019-10-04 18:37:20+00:00): You maybe should read this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dterminal
An airport is everything that is included on the area of that airport, not just a building where passengers can board.
Google translate:
Tal vez deberías leer esto:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dterminal

Un aeropuerto es todo lo que se incluye en el área de ese aeropuerto, no solo un edificio donde los pasajeros pueden abordar.
mavl (2019-03-28 15:50:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных.  
Пожалуйста, ознакомьтесь с системой обозначений OpenStreetMap.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D1%8B  
  
Также, пожалуйста, будьте аккуратны при редактировании. Например, ваш магазин имеет непрямоугольный контур. Этот контур больше реального здания магазина на спутниковом снимке раза в два. И на нём нет тега магазина (обязательного тега для магазинов).  
  
Граница парка, который вы добавили, пересекает сама себя. Это ошибка.
mor (2019-03-28 19:38:46+00:00): ¿Por qué pones una casa rural con la web de otra distinta? Además la casa 3enraya está en Serradilla, no en Carpio.
Civitas (2019-03-29 07:35:03+00:00): ¿Puede ser… Porque cuando se edita, se cometen errores? por supuesto que 3enraya está en Serradilla, ( la puse yo) por eso y cuando editas en JOSM,  el editor anticipa la respuesta y de vez en cuando te pone textos que ya has escrito. Esa razón cada dos o tres días reviso lo que he editado en busca de errores. Si encuentras alguno tan significativo, corrígelo en ese momento, no pasa nada, es un proyecto colaborativo, no tengas miedo en corregir algo que otro ha hecho y está mal, eso es lo que hacemos todos, no me molesta que corrijan algo que he hecho si está mal. Cuando se edita…se comete errores…es humano. Yo si encuentro un error y sé que está mal lo corrijo en el momento, cuanto menos tiempo figure dicho error mejor para todos.
Por cierto ya está corregido y tan solo era el nombre.
mor (2019-03-29 19:35:09+00:00): La mayoría de mis ediciones son correcciones de errores pero en ese momento no podía corregirlo, además al ser algo tan llamativo pensé que a lo mejor tenía algún motivo, por eso te puse el comentario.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:47:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
eggie (2019-03-28 11:20:25+00:00): Top!
PT-53 (2019-04-04 06:51:59+00:00): Hallo slavey,
in ID kann man die amtliche Karte Maps4BW (Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW) einblenden, in der die Gebäude lagegenau und mit EG-Grundriß eingezeichnet sind. 
Schau Dir mal die neuen Gebäude mit Maps4BW nochmal an.
CS-Kommentar ist leider wieder nichtssagend.
Grüße
azakh-world (2019-03-28 16:28:56+00:00): Hello.
Would you be so kind, when creating a node for a subway station and deleting building, to add the node to stop_area relation instead of building. At least this would leave the current things working in applications which rely on PTv2 scheme.

Best regards,
Alexey
DaveF (2019-03-28 19:49:01+00:00): Hi

I could add them but I'm reluctant to add data which isn't really necessary. Talk-transit has discussed their existence & the conclusion is they need to be, at least, simplified, if not removed altogether. Could you provide an explanation of why they're required & a real world example where they benefit OSM data users?

PTv2 appears to be vastly overcomplicated & unnecessary, especially with the rail network where the /vast/ majority of tags are just duplicating existing, well populated, well used tags.
azakh-world (2019-03-29 09:02:22+00:00): I'm not advocating for PTv2 as a whole, but some your actions break the base logic. Lets look at freshly corrupted Circle line https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7671006
It contains sequence of (mainly) stop_positions. But all relevant information about stations (wikipedia, wikidata, name & name translations, wheelchair, ...) is on railway=station objects. How to get information about a station on route? Answer is: through stop_area relation that binds stop_position to station. It would be ok if stations themselves would constitute the route relation, but as long as stop_positions are used we must keep stop_area relations for consistency.
Another example of stop_area usage is building a route from point to point in foot+PT mode. An application has to find nearest station, lead the user to the nearest subway entrance, build path by subway, then propose the best exit to get destination point faster. It is a stop_area relation that connects subway entrances to the station. Routing to the station node is not very illustrative since subway entrances often locate quite far away from each other and from the (often underground) station geometrical center.
Maps.Me app works as described. It builds and displays PT routes in more than 160 cities with rapid transit systems. Some screenshots:
http://www.picshare.ru/view/9973711/
http://www.picshare.ru/view/9973712/
http://www.picshare.ru/view/9973713/
Dimacn (2019-03-29 18:07:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста верните тегирование (статус) дворовых проездов как раньше было. Дворовые проезды отмечаются тегами highway=service и living_street=yes  .   Подробно здесь - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway
eggie (2019-03-28 10:50:19+00:00): Eigenlijk zouden alle niet doorgaande straten in Volendam op termijn een keer op highway=residential moeten worden gezet ipv unclassified.
Voel je overigens niet verplicht. :)
Dat Unclassified is nog een erfenis van de import van AND. 
Gr Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-08-21 20:48:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 73596173 where the changeset comment is: Reverting 'pharmacies used as personal markers'.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3102 for more details..
BCNorwich (2019-03-29 08:27:37+00:00): Hi, just wanted to let you know that a lot of the features added in this changeset are not tagged at all and some are lacking in adequate tags.

What look like building not tagged, What look like buildings within building untagged. 

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-03-29 08:34:22+00:00): Hi, you've inadvertently tagged several features here as buiding=yes, it should be building=yes will an L.

You also have barriers (fences) crossing over each other, I suspect these barriers are joined at the intersection.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2019-03-28 11:13:42+00:00): De straatnaam zal ongetwijfeld Bierkade zijn.
De contour van de brug kun je wel intekenen als man_made=bridge met naam. 
Ook wordt wel  gebruikt name:bridge=... 
naast name =Bierkade
Dat laatst zou je even kunnen nakijken in de wiki.
eggie (2019-03-28 11:16:17+00:00): Het is  bridge:name=*. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:name

Kijk je nog even, want nu is de straatnaam verdwenen.
Gr eggie
mbethke (2019-03-28 11:31:32+00:00): Whow, das nenne ich mal schnell reagiert! Eben noch die Bugs von der Schnorcheltour hochgeladen, und bevor ich zu Ende Mittag gegessen habe, ist das Ding schon gemappt :D
ent8r (2019-03-28 12:05:12+00:00): 😃⚡
Hab gerade etwas mein Tool zum Lösen von Notizen getestet (https://github.com/ENT8R/NotesReview) und deine Notiz war eine der ersten die mir angezeigt wurde 👍
VictorIE (2019-03-29 02:57:35+00:00): Hi

Just wondering what these lines represent

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680035878#map=18/52.98719/-7.90242
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680035874#map=17/52.98649/-7.90201

Note that there is some duplication and doubling back.
Sosha1996 (2019-05-09 06:30:52+00:00): به اشتباه معبر مجاوراین https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/469676391 رو حذف کردید.
Sosha1996 (2019-05-09 07:01:03+00:00): خیلی ممنون که بخشی از مشکل رو رفع کردید، اما کلا رسم این معبر مشکل داره و اون معبر کوچیک اصلا به خیابون متصل نیست.
Sosha1996 (2019-09-21 21:02:56+00:00): توی این ویرایش هم خط‌ها رو روی هم رسم کردید و هم زیاد نود به کار بردید!
eggie (2019-03-28 11:07:51+00:00): Dag Vera... adressen horen niet thuis op gebouwen. Die bevinden zich al op de adresnodes. In het Kadaster bestaat nr 74 niet.
Een terugmelding naar het Kadaster zou dus op z'n plaats zijn.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Nieuwehaven%2074&resultOffset=0&objectId=0385200000001039&geometry.x=132063&geometry.y=502722&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0385010000001039

Ik zet even de gegevens over op een node.
name=75Nieuwehaven lijkt me ook niet correct. 
MVG,
eggie
Vera de Kok (2019-03-28 14:15:30+00:00): dankjewel
PT-53 (2019-03-29 06:06:22+00:00): Hallo Verkehrsplaner_TUD,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Deine Eintragungen sind noch nicht ganz richtig. Bitte ließ Dir doch mal das Wiki zu ÖNPV dazu durch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Public_transport

Hier gibt es noch eine allgemeine Einführung in OSM:
https://einklich.net/temp/osm-tutorial.pdf

Grüße
viloan (2019-03-28 11:06:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Константин Гам (2019-05-14 09:36:16+00:00): Срисовывать что либо с народных яндекс карт запрещено!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553452460
vavposto (2019-05-14 09:47:38+00:00): Шо опять?! Ничего тут с няка не срисовано, делал правки параллельно в няке и осм, после того когда лично там поприсутствовал. + данные от председателя ДПК.
Константин Гам (2019-05-14 12:15:15+00:00): Сошлитесь на исходник и письмо с правом использования данных в коммерции и свободном пользовании всему миру.

Либо нужны фотографии табличек с названиями улиц.

Также landuse=allotments не может быть внутри residential. Тем более если это КП. Не надо мапить под рендер.

Изучите правила осм пожалуйта!
Dimacn (2019-03-28 17:14:22+00:00): Что это и с какой целью? У вас получилась жилая территория поверх другой жилой территории.
user_5359 (2019-03-28 13:53:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your node. You take some very unusual keys of the address information.
s8evq (2019-03-29 14:10:03+00:00): Dag Dusteagle, waarom heb je relation 5844680 verwijderd?
RailAir (2019-03-28 13:58:10+00:00): Hallo Alex,
danke für die Korrektur und die Erklärung. Habe dass auch in der OSM-wiki noch mal nachgelesen. Habe verstanden. Sieht tatsächlich komisch aus.
Gruß, Bernd
mapper377 (2019-03-28 12:12:06+00:00): Source tags should be Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta; Esri World Imagery. This was the imagery used. Internal details for the substation equipment are not clear.
mavl (2019-05-09 21:12:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Alan Bragg (2019-04-19 14:03:21+00:00): Changing road name: Shops As 5 Way to Shops at Five Way
Found discrepancy at https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ setting "View" to "addresses" and checking only "Street not found"
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-10-05 09:07:06+00:00): Do you remember what kind of addresses you tagged on https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/56.03411/-3.41304 ?

Are there multiple addresses such as 50A, 50B etc there?


You added "addr:interpolation=alphabetic" to that location in this address and I am confused about intended meaning.
casstr (2020-10-05 09:13:35+00:00): Those are indeed flats numbered 50A, 50B etc. as per your example in all three buildings. Can you clarify why did you just delete this without checking in first?
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-10-05 12:47:44+00:00): Sorry, it was a mistake. I will fix this.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-10-05 12:49:58+00:00): And why I did this? Because I was sure that this is an incorrect tagging and it was very similar to other cases where it was clearly incorrect tagging.

Here I opened a note because I was unsure, closed it and did edit (as basically always I am too careful in such cases and I get questions why I created note instead of just editing it).

Later someone else reopened note and asked me to reconsider.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-03-28 12:25:35+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 68550893, 68551063, 68551234, 68552007, 68552355, 68552595, 68552955, 68553306, 68553501, 68553703, 68553869, 68554143, 68554478, 68554702, 68554902, 68555072.
BCNorwich (2019-03-29 08:36:07+00:00): Untagged way removed.
eggie (2019-03-28 12:38:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-03-28 12:41:19+00:00): Dag DyaTactic,

Egenijk taggen we in osm geen adressen en bedrijfsinfo  op gebouwen. Deze hoort thuis op de importadresnode van het Kadaster.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-28 13:03:57+00:00): Info heb ik samengevoegd met adresnode.
Adres van gebouw verwijderd.
MVG,
Eggie
DyaTactic (2019-03-28 13:47:30+00:00): Dankje voor het warme welkom en het correct plaatsen van de gegevens.
DyaTactic (2019-03-28 12:24:57+00:00): Oeps, dat was de beschrijving van mij vorige wijziging.
Dit stuk land is een boomgaard, geen grasland.
eggie (2019-03-28 12:42:27+00:00): Lijkt me aardig gelukt :)
Gr eggie
iriman (2019-04-08 17:17:52+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز. برای نام‌گذاری خیابان‌ها کافی است خیابان را انتخاب کنید و نام آن را بنویسید و نیازی به رسم مجدد راه، آن هم روی راه قبلی، نیست. ممکن است خیابان چندتکه باشد اما نامش یکی باشد که در این صورت باید برای هر تکه نام را بنویسید. امکان ادغام‌کردن این راه‌ها با هم نیز وجود دارد که اگر خصوصیات همهٔ تکه‌ها یکی باشد می‌توانید آن‌ها ادغام کنید تا یک بار نام را بنویسید. در هر صورت روی راه‌های قبلی مجددا راه رسم نکنید. با تشکر

راهنمایی بیشتر:
http://ir-osm.mihanblog.com/post/5
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Fa:Beginners'_guide
viloan (2019-03-28 12:37:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2019-03-28 14:06:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! This closed area isn't a priamry highway, it is a building!
user_5359 (2019-03-28 14:03:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! This area isn't a closed highway. It is a building.
GinaroZ (2019-04-11 19:09:58+00:00): Does this path connect to the one near to it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6367519547
meteorquake (2019-04-11 21:43:10+00:00): Oh I forgot to join it in! Thanks for spotting it early!
BCNorwich (2019-03-29 08:44:57+00:00): Hi, you've inadvertently tagged several features here as buiding=yes, it should be building=yes will an L.
BCNorwich (2019-03-29 08:46:54+00:00): Hi, one building is not tagged at all.
BCNorwich (2019-04-02 08:51:37+00:00): No response so I've tagged it for you.
eggie (2019-03-28 13:11:14+00:00): Dag Frans hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan. Ik draai dit alles weer terug.
Probeer goed in te zoomen. het gebied van je edits is veel te groot. Door schuiven met de kaart ontstaat schade door onbedoelde verschuivingen.
Verder heb je ook land in water veranderd.
Dit was je edit
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68624396

verder
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-03-28 13:18:13+00:00):  reverted door Wijzigingenset #68625382
eggie (2019-03-28 13:20:16+00:00): Frans .. Probeer je eerst goed in te lezen. Dit is een bijzonder kwetsbaar gebied ivm met al dat water en land. Niet zomaar van alles gaan veranderen. 
Wat is precies je bedoeling?
Het is nu weer hersteld.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-28 13:20:42+00:00): Ook svp geen Kadasteradressen veranderen of wijzigen.
eggie (2019-03-28 13:15:13+00:00): Deze changeset wordt ook teruggedraaid, want die overlapt de vooorgaande.
wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-03-28 13:17:47+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #68625382
eggie (2019-03-28 13:47:58+00:00): De caravan die er niet meer staat kun je verwijderen. De track zou je voorzichtig kunnen aanpassen.
Gr Eggie
Horza (2019-03-28 12:59:13+00:00): Lots of roads out here tagged as residential despite no sign of houses
ma-rt-in (2019-03-28 14:17:32+00:00): Hallo,
habe gerade deine Änderung betrachtet und habe folgende Anmerkung: 
- Nutzt doch bitte Angaben die hier vorgeschlagen wurden zu verwenden https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=elevator
vg
Sosha1996 (2019-09-21 04:41:54+00:00): رسم خط 462732116 صحیح نیست.
پیاده‌رو رو باید به خیابون لینک میکردید.
frosm (2019-05-18 22:01:51+00:00): bonjour
à lire la note, cela ne semble pas être une borne de recharge de véhicule électrique mais ceci https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=device_charging_station
viloan (2019-03-28 13:26:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-04-22 10:39:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 69447924 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political language edits in de jure Georgia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68973534 .
zorkonius (2019-03-28 14:25:33+00:00): This upload introduced a multipolygon error. I am still new at these, and the ID editor did not catch it... but it rendered in an odd way, and the JOSM editor's verification tool showed an error. I will fix this in an upcoming upload.
cdella (2019-03-29 09:30:18+00:00): He visto que con un zoom alejado del polígono, aun se muestra el antiguo nombre "Camí del Ranxero" y si nos acercamos se visualizan los nuevos nombres. ¿Éso se puede corregir? Saludos.
glibbertorsten (2019-03-28 18:18:38+00:00): Supergeil, dass du dir die Zeit nehmen kannst, um die Buslinen auf den neuesten Stand zu bringen!
✌
PantherStrix (2019-03-29 09:44:15+00:00): Jetzt wo OsmAnd das noch besser implementiert hat, dachte ich mir, ist das mal dringend nötig ;-)
DyaTactic (2019-03-28 13:50:15+00:00): Mag ik ook de brondatum op vandaag zetten omdat de gegevens nog uptodate zijn?
eggie (2019-03-28 14:20:39+00:00): Die brondatum wordt gebruikt bij periodeke updates vanuit de BAG door het BAG team.
Beter daar niets aan wijzigen.
Je kunt dan zien wanneer de laatste import is gedaan.
Gr Eggie
Chrysopras (2019-03-28 14:03:28+00:00): Huch, die Relation ist ja doch noch da – offenbar habe ich da vor lauter Detailprüfung vergessen, die Relation tatsächlich zu löschen. Das habe ich in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68627100 nachgeholt.
jmapb (2019-03-28 14:50:30+00:00): Hi DMcCo, welcome to Openstreetmap!

I'm a mapper active in NYC and I'm examining the changes you've made because you requested that they be reviewed.

The bicycle shop you added as this node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6367677379
was already on the map, tagged as occupying the whole building:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248238789

I'm going to go ahead and combine the two so the shop is not double-mapped. One question -- the opening hours you added are different from the ones listed for the building. What's your sources for these hours? Do they come from a sign on the premises? From a website?

Let me know if you have any questions, I'm happy to assist or advise.

Thanks, jmapb