piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dpolovinkin (2024-04-11 03:58:15+00:00): hi, 2 years passed, but can't see the reason for having two languages in the main name of those university places, there is functionality to make a separate names in other languages for POI. Will fix, just for future for you to know
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 21:16:07+00:00): Здравей Митко,

Чешмата предназначена ли е за каравани или може само да се пълнят шишета? Ако е второто ще те помоля да смениш шаблона ѝ на "Drinking Water". Ако може и името ѝ да бъде на кирилица би било чудесно. Ако имаш някакви въпроси, оставам на разположение.

Поздрави,
Митко
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 11:38:11+00:00): Пътя е третокласен (бивш четвъртокласен) следователно трябва да бъде маркиран като третокласен. За наличието (или липсата на маркировка) се използва тага road_marking. Ако някоя улица е забранена за камиони (с пътен знак) има hgv=no. Ако е забранено за МПС над определено тегло се ползва maxweight.
marczoutendijk (2022-03-24 16:38:38+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5822
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 17:05:28+00:00): Промяната е върната в промяна 118873552.
ivanatora (2022-03-24 07:24:10+00:00): На сателитните снимки изглежда пътят съществува. Моля те за пореден път - не премахвай пътища които съществуват. Ако пътят има ограничения за преминаване, използвай съответните access=* рестрикции.
marczoutendijk (2022-03-24 16:38:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5822
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 17:35:40+00:00): Пътя е върнат.
user_5359 (2022-03-24 10:14:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why delete you the key building?
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:14:40+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
HirschKauz (2022-03-25 16:29:07+00:00): Danke fürs Korrigieren :-) hatte wohl nicht aufgepasst beim Kopieren
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118848915
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:14:35+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
ivanatora (2022-03-26 08:14:30+00:00): Changeset is most probably vandalism from a previously blocked account https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 12:13:38+00:00): Здравей Иван и добре дошъл в OpenStreetMap

Името "трафопост" не е вярно за тази сграда, тъй като името ѝ не е "трафопост". Има шаблон за трафопост, който би следвало да се използва.
Ако имаш някакви въпроси, оставам на разположение.

Поздрави,
Митко
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 17:39:28+00:00): Промяната е върната в промяна 118874855.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-26 16:23:31+00:00): Hello indiasc and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
A couple of things - one is that if you're trying to draw buildings that are made up of right angles you can square them up after drawing with the "q" key.  Also, it helps a lot if you zoom in more and slow down when you are adding buildings - they will be much more accurate.
Another thing to mention is to include some actual words, not just hashtags, in your changeset comments.  Explain what your were doing so that other mappers, especially local ones, can understand your changes.
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
aceman444 (2022-04-01 07:17:16+00:00): Zase chyba zdroj. Hlavne, ked obrysy budov nie su este ani v katastri.
pippoSVK (2022-04-01 07:25:07+00:00): Pouzite boli vykresy z EIA portálu
aceman444 (2022-04-01 18:52:24+00:00): Dakujm, viete zistit, ci tento portal povolil taketo pouzitie ich map?
Do OSM nesmiete obkreslovat zo ziadnej mapy, ktora nedala na to explicitne povolenie. Napr. mame povolenie len od katastra SR a tych leteckych snimok, ktore su dostupne v editoroch (iD, JOSM a pod).
aceman444 (2022-11-05 06:36:47+00:00): Cakame na odpoved.

A preco su tie mury s area=yes? To chcete povedat, ze ten mur je vlasne betonova doska (vysky mozno ako jedno poschodie) pod celou budovou? V tom pripade je to budova, tak ako to zaznacene bolo len ste to znicili. Dodnes ste na to neodpovedali v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112834947.
Dary Raihanah IRM-ED (2022-12-22 06:04:04+00:00): Hi cheng15225,
thank you for your mapping contribution.
I found there are some highway/road features invalid cross or overlap on the reservoir you mapped (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1043350443).
I want to fix this issue but I'm not sure how to do it because I'm a remote mapper and only see the highway features and reservoir from satellite imagery. So, I want to discuss it first with local mapper. Maybe do you know whether the reservoir is intermittent or not? or maybe there are seasonal floods in that area? and if there are seasonal floods, are the roads passable during the seasonal floods?

Here are some examples of highway features that cross the reservoir.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/455719551
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/455727362

is it necessary to add the tag ford=yes like this in this road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/940886449)? or maybe if you have a better suggestion please let know. Thank you.
cheng15225 (2022-12-22 06:38:15+00:00): The road are already permanently flooded. You may adjust as per the latest satellite image.
Dary Raihanah IRM-ED (2023-01-02 04:33:44+00:00): Okay, I will modify the roads. Thank you so much for the information you have provided, it's really helpful.
user_5359 (2022-03-24 08:43:37+00:00): Hello! Please add change set comments to you modification! Which tool did you use, because there no Changeset information!
Jakka (2022-03-24 13:57:56+00:00): Dit toilet staat ergens buiten ? Vermoed van niet. Bezoekers gaan dit niet vinden ...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9602557136#map=19/50.85069/3.09534&layers=N
Kovoschiz (2022-03-24 14:01:48+00:00): Don't add `highway=steps` to `=subway_entrance`. This doesn't make sense, and is a duplicate.
philippec (2022-03-24 09:44:39+00:00): Oostkamp gemeentehuis AED
De mapillary zit op het nul eiland.
zors1843 (2022-03-24 10:06:27+00:00): Heb het opgemerkt Philippe.  Heb ondertussen een bijgewerkte foto upgeload.  Zal het straks nog wijzigen.
Prettige dag nog.
philippec (2022-03-24 10:39:18+00:00): Dat wordt dan nr 1333.
francians (2022-03-24 19:25:41+00:00): Buonasera Tizianamox,

grazie per il contributo.
Suggerisco di non scrivere tutte le lettere in maiuscolo, oltre che per i commenti dei changeset anche per il tag name, sarebbe meglio usare solo la lettera iniziale: Bosco della Costituzione e Boschi dei Bambini (essendo quei Bambini e non tutti i bambini)

Grazie molte
Saluti
Francesco
tizianamox (2022-03-24 19:48:49+00:00): Gent.mo, sono una maestra  e tendo a scrivere con i caratteri maiuscoli per agevolare la lettura. Ho modificato il tag name  ma sui commenti penso di non poter intervenire.
Grazie infinite per i suggerimenti!
francians (2022-03-24 19:55:08+00:00): Grazie per la pronta risposta! Perfetto così.

Grazie ancora e buona serata
Francesco
wkdgs (2022-03-24 09:00:46+00:00): Hier könnte leisure=garden passen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118852237
tordans (2022-03-25 08:26:47+00:00): Danke, habe ich so geändert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118897512, auch in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118897420. VG
dolomynum (2022-04-29 05:00:05+00:00): Hi, you duplicated several addresses with this changestet, f.i. this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9602656892
versus this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8918436290
I will remove the duplicate addresses.
rarad74 (2022-04-29 05:17:33+00:00): Hi. Yes. My mistake.
wkdgs (2022-03-24 08:55:38+00:00): Kannst du die Löschungen in diesem Changeset mal etwas genauer erkären.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118852911
fh77 (2022-04-08 11:47:14+00:00): Da kann ich helfen. John hat den Golfplatz komplett neu gemappt. Oft ist das alte Mapping nicht sehr gut, wenn es nicht von einem Golfer erstellt wurde. Es ist einfacher, Mappings zu löschen und neu zu erstellen, als es zu bearbeiten. Ich habe das Mapping geprüft, teilweise ergänzt. Sieht sehr gut aus.
wkdgs (2022-04-08 12:08:56+00:00): Ah, okay. Danke für die Info.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118852911
DUGA (2022-03-26 23:30:36+00:00): What you may consider doing is adding proper turn restrictions here rather than mapping a bunch of Ys.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043366932#map=19/39.19744/-76.61083
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2022-03-28 10:44:40+00:00): Hi, DUGA

My name is Yuliya and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Thank you for paying attention to this.
The unclassified road here is oneway (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1043366949). If I understand correctly, the only turn restrictions that could be needed without “Ys” are no_u_turns. But there aren’t any signs for turn restrictions here.

The Lyft team strives to make edits in accordance with all generally accepted practices in OSM.
Perhaps it is acceptable to ignore small barriers in parking lots, but we decided that it is better to apply minor geometry changes instead of adding multiple implicit turn restrictions.

However, the main reason for such geometry with “Ys” is representing the actual road geometry, not prohibition of any maneuvers.
There are physical barriers according to the proprietary streetlevel images:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_qtSdwBGTMX2D6xHMHxWPkX32OqXNZ22/view?usp=sharing - taken 2022-03-03 from the point with coordinates 39°11′50″N, 76°36′38″W
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XzdhmseoB0I2hPCR7uKTOM8B99aPT5IF/view?usp=sharing
- taken 2022-02-18 from the point with coordinates 39°11′49″N, 76°36′39″W.
Please let me know if you have any further questions or evidence that could help me to understand your point in this case

Thank you for your contribution,
Yuliya
DUGA (2022-03-28 12:16:45+00:00): Hi Yuliya,

Thank you for the reply.

Actually turn restrictions are marked on the ground, because the road is one way, you cannot make a left turn from the parking lot.

No U turn is not something I noticed to be missing (yes normally no one will do this in such a small area), however when you map it, you not only map for cars, you also need to think about trucks.

I appreciate your effort on this though. In my opinion, barriers like these become just tiny indicators of no left turn (because of one way), and that’s why I have the opinion of not mapping in details.
YuliyaShustava_lyft (2022-03-28 13:37:09+00:00): Thank you for sharing your opinion. We appreciate it. I agree with you that it really looks like there isn't a strong need for such a detailed mapping. We will learn more about mapping roads with barriers and will consider updating our approach concerning not mapping parking roads such meticulously.

Best regards,
Yuliya
gscscnd (2022-03-24 15:29:35+00:00): Relacje type=multipolygon takie jak <https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13957794> wyglądają na zbędne.
RicoElectrico (2022-03-24 16:40:38+00:00): @gscscnd - iD robi je sam przy łączeniu wielokątów.

Ale i tak ten wielokąt powinien zostać podzielony, nie ma potrzeby żeby był połączony takimi wężykami wzdłuż drogi.
NieWnen (2022-03-24 16:58:47+00:00): A to mi teraz @Rico wyjaśniłeś skąd ten wysyp multipolygonów u nowych użytkowników.
damianjj (2022-03-24 20:18:52+00:00): Rozumiem, że ten poligon to dziwny twór. Zdaję se z tego sprawę.
W miarę możliwości podzielę go.
A skąd takie coś nadal tam jest? Ja tylko delikatnie poprawiałem, naciągałem to co już było.
Sorki.
aceman444 (2022-04-01 06:57:06+00:00): Zdravim, prosim uvadzajte aj zdroj udajov. "OpenStreetMap (Standard)" mapa to urcite nebola.

Dakujem za pridanie Mobelixu. Zaujimave, ze nic z jeho arealu nie je este v katastri. Ked ma jedno parkovisko netreba ho sekat na jednotlive pasy. Pozrite okolite parkoviska.
bergaufsee (2022-03-24 21:11:16+00:00): Hallo sladeleveller und willkommen bei OSM.
Hat sich mit deinen Anpassungen der Hinweis unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3100454 erledigt? Wenn ja, magst du diesen schließen?
Solltest du dabei Hilfe benötigen oder sonstige Fragen rund um OSM haben kannst du dich gern auch bei mir melden.
Viel Spaß weiterhin beim mappen.
Gruß bergaufsee
jpennycook (2022-03-24 09:00:57+00:00): Hi!

With OpenStreetMap, we map what is on the ground - this is a road with restricted access, so should be tagged with motor_vehicle=private rather than changing it to a highway=bridleway.

I'll fix it shortly.

Jon
*myname* (2022-03-24 09:46:55+00:00): Thanks Jon,

This has been raised as a concern by the residents of the track as map/sat nav routes are sending trucks/lorries along it. Would marking it as private change routing?
jpennycook (2022-03-24 10:18:33+00:00): Hello.

Tagging it as motor_vehicle=private ought to do it, as long as the sat navs/journey planners use OSM as their data source.  Unfortunately, not all journey planners will update immediately.  If you know which journey planners are causing problems, it would be best to contact them directly to make sure they do take an update.

This entry in the Wiki seems most appropriate: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access#Road_where_residents.2C_pedestrians_and_cyclists_are_allowed (further down, there's a table with all the possible values, like "yes", "private", etc.)

Jon
Layft Greater (2024-09-09 12:40:39+00:00): Why "not:brand:wikidata" ? 
Now corrected.
Layft Greater (2024-09-09 12:41:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4242359918
flohoff (2022-03-24 09:46:19+00:00): Moin,
hier sind einige wege mit Wildwuchs an access tags

access=no
bicycle=no
foot=no
horse=no
motor_vehicle=no

Das ist alles total redundant. Ein access=no ist ausreichend. 

Ich halte im überigen das access=no für falsch. Das ist vermutlich eher access=private. Denn es wird ja nur für die öffentlichkeit gesperrt.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118854008
DeFra85 (2022-03-24 09:54:56+00:00): Du beziehst dich wahrscheinlich auf die abandoned:highways.
Da sie abandoned sind könnte des access ja glaube ich eh entfallen, oder?
Eleferen (2022-03-26 21:25:41+00:00): Подскажите, пожалуйста источник информации о новых границах? На ПКК я вижу всё ещё старые границы.
mavl (2022-03-24 13:12:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118864649 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118733296].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:35:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
eggie (2022-03-24 09:41:51+00:00): Dag Hlubach  Er is een ovesteekplaats..
Wanneer het een zebra is dan 
crossing_ref=zebra ipv marked

name=voetgangers oversteekplaats hoort niet op de kaart. Dus name= verwijderen svp.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118854405
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-24 10:24:47+00:00): crossing_ref=zebra toegevoegd..
crossing=marked was oke..
name=voetgangers oversteekplaats verwijderd.
Gebruik alleen name als iets echt een naam heeft. 

MVG
eggie
mavl (2022-03-24 13:12:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118864649 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118733296].
eggie (2022-03-24 09:44:04+00:00): Zeker weten payment_terminal ?
NIet amenity=atm operator=Gelmaat
Dus niet name=Geldmaat gebruiken.
Verder operator Abn verwijderen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118854514
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-24 09:48:52+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast..
NieWnen (2022-03-25 11:35:56+00:00): Jest to zbędne, foot=yes jest domyślnym accessem na highway=path

A ten access=forestry i inne accessy tez można przy okazji wyrzucić, bo to nie jest już track, a path, a przynajmniej tak jest zmapowane.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Poland
englu (2022-03-25 14:20:45+00:00): Wiem, że zgodnie z OSM tak powinno być, ale niestety zależy to od implementacji routera. Np. OSMR i Valhalla nie znajdują trasy pieszej po highway=path z samym access=forestry. Trochę to jest mapowanie pod routing, ale wg mnie w tym przypadku jest to uzasadnione. 

A co do samego access=forestry to dlaczego ma on nie mieć zastosowania do ścieżek? Wydaje mi się, że ścieżki w parkach narodowych dostępne tylko dla służb parku mogłyby być tak otagowane. No chyba, że jest lepszy sposób na to. W Kampinoskim PN jest obecnie trochę ścieżek tak zmapowanych.
NieWnen (2022-03-25 14:41:41+00:00): > A co do samego access=forestry to dlaczego ma on nie mieć zastosowania do ścieżek?

Bo po ścieżkach highway=path z założenia pojazdy silnikowe jechać nie powinny i jak dla mnie ktoś dokonał kiedyś zmiany, ale zapomniał po prostu zmienić tego access.

I widzę tutaj 2 rozwiązania:

1. Jeśli to jest jakaś wąska ścieżka, po której nie przejadą większe pojazdy, to wyrzuciłbym wszystkie accessy i zostawił same highway=path i to samo w sobie ma domyślne accessy na yes dla pieszych.

2. Jeśli nie, to przywróciłbym track i wtedy forestry wydaje się być ok, bo limitujemy dla służb leśnych i wtedy foot=yes, czy nawet bicycle=yes byłoby ok, aby dopuścić tam ich ruch.

Oczywiście jeśli chcemy robić accessy, to najpierw powinny zostać zweryfikowane, czy stoją tam jakieś znaki, które czegokolwiek zabraniają, bo np. tutaj (way/168351746) takie są i jest dość jasno wyznaczone, kto co może, a poprzednie np. wersja 4 były kompletnie oderwane od rzeczywistości, choć w międzyczasie się to po prostu mogło pozmieniać.
NieWnen (2022-03-25 14:54:20+00:00): Hmm zły przykład dałem, akurat tam, chyba można by zamienić z no, na forestry, niewiele to zmieni dla ogółu, ale chyba będzie bardziej poprawne w tym przypadku.
Przyznam, że z tym tagiem wtedy się jeszcze nie spotkałem.
englu (2022-03-25 15:49:10+00:00): Tag access=forestry dotyczy chyba wszelkich pojazdów, w tym rowerów, które po ścieżkach mogą jeździć, więc teoretycznie tag ten mógłby mieć zastosowanie do highway=path, ale nie wiem czy w rzeczywistości coś takiego gdzieś występuje :)
NieWnen (2022-03-25 15:58:37+00:00): > Tag access=forestry dotyczy chyba wszelkich pojazdów, w tym rowerów, które po ścieżkach mogą jeździć, więc teoretycznie tag ten mógłby mieć zastosowanie do highway=path,

W sumie to patrząc w ten sposób to masz rację. Tak przynajmniej podaje wiki (choć uważam, że akurat ten tag jest ogólnie niezbyt jasny/precyzyjny). Pytanie tylko, czy takie połączenie ma sens? Nie znam się na leśnictwie i nie wiem, czy mają taki sprzęt co się nadaje do korzystania po highway=path np.
jak by rower był podpisany, że to sprzęt leśnictwa, to wtedy może jechać, a wpp. nie, ale chyba zbyt nisko z tym schodzimy.
Vinber-Pro (2022-03-25 10:46:52+00:00): je vois que tu as ajouté shop=vacant sur La Ruche SAPIC, peut-être que le office=association n'est plus d'actualité ?
à plus
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118854673
SekeRob (2022-03-25 09:55:26+00:00): 'root'? If you don't like MP shared line use on building parts and make it simple you need to remove the multipolygon type too. On that token the building relation and building:part tagging is missing as well ;O)

ciao
SekeRob (2022-03-25 09:56:28+00:00): Sorry, the building relation is already there I see.
mavl (2022-03-24 13:12:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118864649 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118733296].
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:33:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
mavl (2022-03-24 13:12:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118864649 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118733296].
flohoff (2022-03-24 09:44:32+00:00): Moin,
nur weil ich es hier gerade sehe. Auf dem track ist ein access=yes und ein foot=yes drauf.

Das wäre mehr als der default für highway=track - Ich halte das für ziemlich kaputt:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

D.h. aus einem vehicle=destination wird ein vehicle=yes - Ich glaube nicht das du da Autos durchschicken willst.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118855203
DeFra85 (2022-03-24 09:53:38+00:00): Am access habe ich nichts verändert, die waren schon so.
DeFra85 (2022-03-24 10:09:46+00:00): Also sind quasi die bereits gesetzten access=yes auf den Forstwegen hier Schwachsinn, wie ich das aus dem wiki entnehme?
mavl (2022-03-24 13:12:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118864649 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118733296].
mavl (2022-05-20 15:51:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
muzirian (2022-03-25 18:59:03+00:00): welcome to osm mapping, orupad error varund, please check learnosm.org on how to map.

Also you can talk to other mappers on t.me/osmkerala
Vinber-Pro (2022-03-25 10:45:34+00:00): salut Matmat,
il n'y a que le tag name pour Swixim, qu'est ce que c'est comme magasin ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9602798650

Vincent
Matmat-25 (2022-03-25 15:01:31+00:00): Bonjour Vinber-Pro,
il m'avait semblé que le correctif avait été apporté en rentrant au bureau.
mais c'est corrigé, merci de ta bienveillance
@+
Matt
mavl (2022-03-24 10:22:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 118268576, 118268605, 118268614, 118268737, 118268883, 118268900, 118271764, 118271918, 118271946, 118273141, 118273327, 118273630, 118733296, 118735218, 118737352, 118737550, 118762518, 118763201, 118763947, 118765121, 118765832, 118766234, 118766534, 118768331, 118768442, 118768695, 118772903, 118773373, 118774186, 118775429, 118776571, 118778469, 118778867, 118779469, 118819869, 118820385.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-06-06 12:36:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122022118 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint t the DWG, reverting some name removals and other dubious changes in Iraq.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6046 .
KartoGrapHiti (2023-12-01 16:15:56+00:00): Der Schulhof der Ricarda-Huch-Schule wurde mit place=square eingetragen. Das macht aber keinen Sinn. Der Schulhof ist weder ein öffentlicher Platz, noch hat er einen Namen. Place wird nur für Objekte mit Namen zusätzlich zu Straßen und Wegen eingetragen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:place
HeiligerHein112 (2023-12-01 16:35:51+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. (Ich hatte den "Platz" an die Gebäude angepasst und dabei die Bezeichnung nicht geändert.) Ich habe an beiden "Plätzen" nördl. und südl. der "Schillerstraße" die Bezeichnung in Schule/Schulgelände geändert.
KartoGrapHiti (2023-12-01 17:19:19+00:00): Ein Platz ist keine Schule. Die Schule ist doch schon eingetragen gewesen. Bitte informiere Dich im Wiki, was die Tags bedeuten, bevor Du etwas änderst. Lass doch einfach die Einträge so, wie sie sind.
Philipp25 (2022-03-24 15:45:18+00:00): Danke!