piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2021-11-27 10:49:58+00:00): Hi,

I added the Italian wiki link, after-all we're in Italy, or are we? The english wiki has no link through to the Italian which is why the addition. wikipedia:it is a legal code, at least some 80 uses per taginfo. Lest you have a solution, I'll change the main link to the Italian if you don't mind.

ciao
user_5359 (2021-11-27 15:14:13+00:00): The first sentence would be important: The language code should be used in the value and not in the key. It is up to the submitter to select the best description in Wikipedia. If several good descriptions are available, the national or local language should be preferred. Reason is that Wikipedia has its own linking of the languages, and a multiple mention on the same information is superfluous. 
I removed the Italian variant because it was added and the notation with underscore is not correct. Of course you are free to change the value from the Wikipedia key to the Italian page.
SekeRob (2021-11-27 15:27:52+00:00): I had not expected any other reply. Since the system carries dozens of the 'incorrectly' formatted with those underscores, left unactioned, the mentioned 80 or so just in Italy, that's what monkeys do, they copy and then decided to wait on Osmose to flag me tomorrow with any issue on that item, but you did not give it a hope in heck. Rather than just deleting and in the meantime while i was active in that zone and continuously touching on the park outline it caused a conflict alert during saving. Not good. Don't understand any mapper jumping in, It would have been much more appreciated if you just had dropped me a note on my change set, no conflicts, no irritations.

As an OT, here's your Neis stats page: https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?user_5359 ... An interesting read.

cheers.
user_5359 (2021-11-27 15:50:59+00:00): I look at these error sources at irregular intervals with the current changes. I am sorry if my change should have disturbed you. But whether still one works on data, one cannot determine unfortunately. With unclear situations or frequent errors of the same person I write also a change sentence comment.
SekeRob (2021-11-27 16:17:43+00:00): Reality is, I did not know what was changed and standard I then choose to keep the edit that was done by the prior mapper. Only when I revisited to do what I said I'd do did I learn that me keeping your edit resulted in some dozen sections of my edit loosing the MP link to the park relation.

As for the underscores in the wiki links I'm very aware, but as it stood, when visiting the link after saving it against wikipedia:it it proofed working perfectly fine. Makes me think the convention applies to wikipedia= only but then there are an immense mound of taggings with educated guessing required in the OSM system.

The wikidata tag did not need updating as that page does have multilingual references, pity though that they author did not insert the hyperlinks in the page. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1085735

My proficiency in that system is very limited, more chance to break it than make it.

Anyway, communicating up front is I think immensely better, makes friends not fiends.


ciao
Frans S (2021-11-27 10:33:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Building not  accurate drawn.
E: Rectangular Building not  squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114288252
Frans S (2021-11-27 11:49:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Don't mark roads with tags that don't make sense
like 'motorway crossing ' on a local small road.

Please read this wiki about tagging highways in African Countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114288337
Frans S (2021-11-27 10:32:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Do you have local knowlegde about the use of the building?
You mapped here an area as a building.
Buildings should be mapped over the outlines of each individual building.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114288367
Frans S (2021-11-27 14:16:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114288725
Frans S (2021-11-27 10:19:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.
This comment is also valid for other changesets from you

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114288796
Frans S (2021-11-27 10:15:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to tagging standards of HOT OSM
Please tag as described in this WIKI
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries

Best regards


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114288819
Frans S (2021-11-27 14:15:16+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
E: Buildings not squared.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114288899
Frans S (2021-11-27 11:26:06+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
The imagery is not that easy to map from
Check an object if it has a shadow next to it or when it is obvious it is a bulding.
I cannot recognize a building in it. 

Best regards
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114288943
Dave Venables (2021-11-28 11:07:39+00:00): The old1_name tag was not added by me but I was the last person to edit the node and did not correct it until yesterday.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-27 12:54:42+00:00): Ciao. building=retail si usa per edifici dove sono presenti esclusivamente negozi o grandi magazzini. Qui c'è un gommista. Non mi sembra il tag adatto. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114289062
mikki65 (2021-11-27 13:27:20+00:00): e' una nota fatta con streetcomplet non e' un tag una nota
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-27 13:41:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165966739
Frans S (2021-11-27 11:27:38+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114289066
Gonéo (2021-11-29 20:18:15+00:00): Attention, plusieurs bâtiments se croisent (dont la Manufacture) comme indiqué sur les avertissements du groupe de changements.
FabMarCat (2021-11-30 08:07:46+00:00): J'avais bien vu mais ce n'est pas moi qui ai saisie les bâtiments et je ne les ai pas modifié. J'ai simplement modifié la zone de chantier, puisque l'ensemble immobilier a été inauguré ...
Gonéo (2021-11-30 12:58:53+00:00): OK c'est noté. Ça devrait ressortir dans les signalements et un contributeur motivé le corrigera.
Frans S (2021-11-27 10:47:43+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.
This can be tagged as building=construction.
Do you have local knowledge? you added a bike parking


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114289330
Frans S (2021-11-27 10:38:05+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapped as 1 building.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114289398
Frans S (2021-11-27 11:53:06+00:00): Hello again.
See my previous comment on your mappings
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114289614
Frans S (2021-11-27 10:44:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114289755
Frans S (2021-11-27 10:43:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.

E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.
G: Included the shadow of the mapped building in the mapping
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114289772
trigpoint (2021-12-01 18:10:15+00:00): In the UK, where we do not have anti-pedestrian jaywalking laws the the consensus is the map sidewalks as part of the road using sidewalk=left/right/both.

Where there is a separation it important to provide good connectivity.

Some odd routing otherwise occurs https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=52.89667%2C-2.67117%3B52.89739%2C-2.67301

Cheers Phil
Frans S (2021-11-27 11:09:18+00:00): Hello. Please map more accurate
This objects, where is no roof, can be tagged as building=construction.
Nest regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114289857
Frans S (2021-11-27 11:07:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:


A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114289938
Cristoffs (2021-11-27 18:30:09+00:00): Zmiany zostaną wycofane jako wandalizm
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114289986
Frans S (2021-11-27 11:52:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings or roads.E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared.
E: Buildings not squared.
Please do not upload every single mapped building . Collect a number of buildings before uploading them.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114290016
Frans S (2021-11-27 11:58:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I reviewed your mappings till now and am sorry to say that your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not always accurate drawn.
E: Buildings not squared.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114290078
mstock (2021-12-04 15:04:50+00:00): Hallo sk94,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass in diesem und ein paar nachfolgenden Aenderungssaetzen einige Flaechen als `leisure=garden` getaggt werden. Ich weiss noch nicht, ob ich das gut oder schlecht finde, wuerde es selbst aber ziemlich sicher nicht oder nicht so machen, weil es doch auch noch einige andere Dinge, die kein Garten sind, wie z.B. Parkplaetze oder Zufahrtswege/-flaechen, in diesen Gebieten hat. Mindestens in der englischen Version der Beschreibung des Tags im Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden) steht auch "Areas should not include features (for example residential houses) which are not part of the garden itself.", das wuerde durch diese Flaechen verletzt. Im Detail gibt es auch noch ein paar Stellen, wo die neuen Flaechen Trottoirs oder Fusswege schneiden, die ausserhalb der Gebiete liegen.

Gruss
mstock
user_469696 (2021-12-04 15:49:37+00:00): Hallo mstock. Ich gebe dir in jedem Punkt recht. Ich habe die Flächen eher ungenau und auf die Schnelle gezeichnet. Ich bin mir selber noch nicht ganz sicher, wie es im Detail genau besser gemacht werden sollte. Sollte um das Haus herum gezeichnet werden? Jedes Grundstück einzeln und als Multipolygon? Was ist mit einem vernünftigen Aufwand überhaupt möglich? Die Fragen sind nicht ganz einfach zu beantworten. Grundsätzlich finde ich es eigentlich keine schlechte Sache, die Flächen einzuzeichnen. In Genf wurde sehr viel so gemappt. Aber ein Dialog wäre sicherlich gut.
mstock (2021-12-05 22:00:35+00:00): Hallo sk94,
um das Haus herum zeichnen geht vermutlich nicht in jedem Fall, daher ist das wohl schwierig. Grundstuecke einzeln erfassen haette sicher einen gewissen Zusatznutzen, aber hat halt auch das Problem, dass nicht unbedingt das ganze Grundstueck ein Garten ist - dies als Multipolygon zu erfassen und z.B. das Haus und Parkplaetze/Wege ausnehmen waere technisch zwar wohl korrekt (oder zumindest nicht ganz falsch), resultiert aber in sehr vielen Multipolygonen, was sicher auch nicht ideal ist - das muss ja alles auch noch irgendwie gepflegt werden koennen und so 'gruen' wie z.B. Frauenfeld ist, ergaebe das wohl fast ein Multipolygon pro Wohngebaeude, also eine ganze Menge. D.h. ja, es ist nicht ganz einfach zu entscheiden, wie man das erfassen will ;).
Dass diese Gaerten in Genf schon ziemlich umfassend erfasst wurden, wusste ich nicht - scheint mir aber in der Schweiz schon eher die Ausnahme zu sein, aufgefallen war mir das sonst noch nicht. Wenn man sie erfassen will, wuerde ich zumindest noch dazu tendieren, `garden:type=residential`- und `access=private`-Tags zu setzen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:garden:type), so lassen sie sich z.B. von oeffentlichen Gaerten unterscheiden.
Fuer einen Dialog in groesserer Runde kannst du ja vielleicht auch mal ein Mail an die talk-ch-Liste schicken (https://lists.openstreetmap.ch/mailman/listinfo/talk-ch).

Gruss
mstock
user_469696 (2021-12-05 23:04:36+00:00): Ehrlich gesagt habe ich eigentlich nicht gross Lust mich vertieft damit zu befassen. Vielleicht werde ich sie einfach wieder löschen, sonst komme ich noch in Versuchung.
Frans S (2021-11-27 11:40:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About tagging of highways.
In urban areas like here, you best tag roads as residential or path (narrow)
don't start a road as 'service' followed by an 'unclassified'piece
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114290579