piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
lcat (2021-02-20 13:35:45+00:00): Видимо да
iWowik (2021-03-17 08:15:29+00:00): Тогда похоже стоит откатить вандальное удаление валидных данных
Geogast (2016-07-20 15:06:30+00:00): source=public domain image
Ben Carson (2016-07-20 17:00:16+00:00): Oops, I meant "It is noW BNC Bank.
Geogast (2016-07-20 15:06:21+00:00): source=public domain image
yasunari (2016-07-20 15:26:42+00:00): 独立した建物ですので、
building=shrine
を付加してください
sommerluk (2016-07-21 19:16:02+00:00): Les maisons dans l’eau de Ganvié en OSM – j’aime ça ! Merci !
Jean Passepartout (2016-08-24 18:39:12+00:00): Bridge (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432145527) flows north-south but each end connects to roads flowing east-west.  There is no current imagery, so I can't tell if this is correct.  I can fix this, if you want.
trigpoint (2016-07-20 17:10:12+00:00): OSM is a public database, please do not abuse it by adding personal markers.
I am reverting this
5m4u9 (2016-07-20 17:32:27+00:00): añadí aquí la categoría correcta del colegio...

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4313264565

sería bueno añadir más datos de horario de servicio, telefonos, email, página web, si tienen wifi gratis, y otros.
trigpoint (2016-07-20 17:06:29+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. This edit is a little odd, alpine huts are really rare in Birmingham.
The name seems to translate as Macka's House which makes it look like a personal marker.
Please remember that OSM is a public database and should not be used in this way.
I am reverting this.
naoliv (2016-07-20 21:39:59+00:00): MiLorde, não realinhe os dados que já existem no mapa, por favor. Ao invés disso apenas desloque a imagem de fundo.
Na hora que estiver editando, dê uma olhada nessa parte:
https://i.imgur.com/8N8zcfn.png

Basta clicar nas setas até que a imagem de fundo se alinhe com o que já existe no mapa.
FredrikLindseth (2016-07-20 19:23:36+00:00): You should look whats in the map before you add new objects. Also the names should be in norwegian or at worst english.

These bus stations are duplicates of already existing. The names are also not the actual names, and not in Norwegian. I reverted this changeset.
Åleg DN (2016-07-20 20:32:45+00:00): at worst, and so will do)
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-08-19 01:39:52+00:00): Hi dcthomp
I'va changed this road classification of this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40901771) to service road
Thank you
mavl (2016-07-21 17:18:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. К сожалению, вы неправильно изменили названия. В соглашении не это имелось в виду.
Правильно:  
улица Такташ  
улица Механизаторов  
и так далее.  
Общее правило: улица Пушкина, но Пушкинская улица.  
Сейчас улицам возвращены прежние названия.  
  
Вы перестили точку населённого пункта на 3 метра. Эта точка должна находится в культурном центре (возле дома культуры, на главной площади или в другом важном месте). Если вы знаете, где находится этот культурный центр, то передвиньте точку центра туда. Сейчас эта точка находится в чьих-то огородах, где вряд ли находится культурный центр.  
  
addr:city=Ембаево на домах можно не указывать. Все дома внутри границы населённого пункта автоматически относятся к этому населённому пункту.
Dmitriy (EvilTwin) (2016-07-22 04:15:38+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Извиняюсь, действительно неправильно понял. Центр поселка переместил видимо случайно, но знаю где он находится.
Перемещу в следующих правках.
mavl (2016-07-22 04:23:38+00:00): Хорошо. Спасибо. Немного о центре населённого пункта написано по адресу http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:place
Tomas Straupis (2016-07-20 20:27:06+00:00): ref žymoje yra valstybinus numeris (šiuo atveju 5256), o name yra gatvės pavadinimas (šiuo atveju „Žirgų g.“). Nereikia prigalvoti savo sistemų :-D
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-07-28 06:38:24+00:00): Hi MayHlaing
I'va changed this road classification to residential
Thank you
Fanny IRM-ED (2020-08-04 04:11:59+00:00): Hi kmaratea87
I'va changed this road classification to residential highway
Thank you
PT-53 (2016-07-20 18:53:50+00:00): Hallo Finnbaer ,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz einen Node mit tourismus=information und name=Brackenhofen eingetragen.
Leider fehlt die Art der Information (information=board + board_type=?) siehe
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:board_type
. Auch hat eine Informationstafel keinen Namen.
Verbesserst Du das noch ?
Grüße
user_5359 (2016-07-21 05:46:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
Владимир К (2016-07-21 08:23:28+00:00): Удаляю, больница уже отмечена на контуре здания.
maraf24 (2016-07-22 16:11:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432193081
Po narysowaniu budynku można wcisnąć S, co spowoduje wyprostowanie katów. Większość budynków ma kąty proste, w tym ten, do którego link podałem wyżej.
freebeer (2018-05-12 12:26:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58901316 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal residence shelter spam
11daf (2016-07-22 14:21:51+00:00): Добрый день. Не уточните на какой улице этот дом? Ленина или Маркса?
Tomas Straupis (2016-07-20 20:45:22+00:00): Prieš keičiant esamus objektus reikia pasidomėti žymėjimo taisyklėmis. Pakeitimas atšauktas.
Tomas Straupis (2016-07-20 20:47:25+00:00): Panašu, kad prašomasi paskyros blokavimo.
CurlyCurd (2016-07-20 20:55:10+00:00): Ok, sorry. Look new to this. I will look more into how to cleanly edit. Will be more careful.
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-07-28 07:17:26+00:00): Hi Theresa Olson
I'va changed this road classification of this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40904190 to residential road
Thank you
MMN-o (2016-07-24 19:37:32+00:00): Awesome changeset! *applauds*
5m4u9 (2016-07-22 06:13:16+00:00): please dont tag using cuisine=vegetarian, already added diet:vegetarian=yes
kayle (2016-07-26 12:40:27+00:00): Zdravím, jedna otázka tá zastávka je naozaj tak "ďaleko" od cesty?
pyram (2016-07-21 16:08:05+00:00): Hallo Weltstaat,
was bedeutet für dich, dass Du das 3D-Modell nicht zerstörst/das building nicht veränderst, wenn Du innerhalb von 24 Stunden schon wieder den Grundriss unsachgemäß änderst? Wir verwenden hier übrigends HiRes-Luftbilder, die man lagemäßig definitiv nicht nach bing verbessern kann. Die source-Angabe survey halte ich dahingehend für einen Witz, wenn ich deine länderübergreifenden Änderungen sehe...
Weltstaat (2016-07-21 20:16:15+00:00): Hallo Pyram,
wenn ich Indoor-Flächen modelliere ist es nur logisch, dass ich die mit dem Gebäude-Grundriss verbinde. Dass dieser dadurch minimal beeinträchtigt wird kann ich nicht ausschließen. Allerdings handelt es sich da maximal um Dezimeter, was auf keinen 3D Renderer eine optische Auswirkung hat. Nur, dass wir uns verstehen - ich hab mir das 3D Modell angeschaut und finds super - ich will das keinesfall zerstören. Ich versuch einfach nur da noch eine schöne Indoor-Umgebung reinzuzaubern. Dass da jetzt noch einige Fehler drin sind, ist klar nachdem ich erst Ebene 0 und 1 von insgesamt 6 hab. Deine Einwände von gestern, hab ich berücksichtigt, auch wenn ich "highway=pedestrian" nicht unbedingt nachvollziehen kann. Für das building auf dem Fahrstuhl tuts mir leid - das war ein Fehler. 
Ich hab momentan leider nur Zugriff auf Bing, falls du einen offenen WMS kennst, würd ich mich freun!
Weltstaat (2016-07-21 20:17:07+00:00): ps: ich bin sehrwohl in Nürnberg und hab gute 15h auf dem Bahnhof verbracht ;)
pyram (2016-07-23 13:36:21+00:00): Das 3D geht nicht dadurch kaputt, dass man Punkte um ein paar dm/m verschiebt, sondern wenn die building:part nicht mehr das komplette building ausfüllen oder gar teilweise außerhalb liegen. Auch ist es hier üblich, dass die Gebäude nicht nach footprint erfasst werden, sondern auch wesentliche oberirdische Gebäudeteile/Dächer mit umfassen. Objekte, wie http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=49.4404518&lon=11.1056024&zoom=19&camera.theta=75.13&camera.phi=42.008 wären sonst nicht ansatzweise sinnvoll in OSM erfassbar (und das sieht die bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung auch so, wenn Du im BayernAtlas die Grundrisse der Bundesanstalt und des Bahnhofs vergleichst).
Welche Teile dann auch auf dem Boden "wirksam" sind, erkennt man dann z.B. am min_level. Momentan fehlen in F4map die beiden seitlichen Gebäudetrakte :-(
Wenn Du mit deinem Umbau fertig bist, werde ich das jedenfalls notfalls schon wieder reparieren.

Mir ist dein indoor ansonsten ja schnuppe - aber dass die Läden bis zur Außenwand gehen, finde ich bei der "Präzision" irgendwie komisch.

Und ob das mappen von Läden als Flächen in mehreren Ebenen für das KISS-Prinzip so hilfreich ist, wage ich zu bezweifeln: Habe erst diese Woche zwei doppelt erfasste Geschäfte im Bahnhof wieder entfernt...

Nicht jeder flächige Fußweg ist eine Fußgängerzone. Sonst könnte man jeden breiteren Gehsteig auch so erfassen - und das will hoffentlich keiner ernsthaft. Wenn man unbedingt will, dann kann man mit area:highway=* arbeiten. Wobei ich beim indoor definitiv corridor für ausreichend halte und man da keine "Straße" modellieren sollte.

HiRes bekommt man in N nicht per WMS, sondern so:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:WissensWert/Luftbilder#Anleitung_f.C3.BCr_die_AEROWEST-Webseite
Weltstaat (2016-07-23 16:18:45+00:00): ok, ich verstehe. Vielen Dank für den Hinweis auf die Aeroview Photos! Die waren mir nicht bekannt. Ich werde die Geschäftsflächen auch nochmal überarbeiten und einen 30cm Abstand zu den Aussenwänden lassen, damit wir da nicht in Konflikt geraten!
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-07-28 06:34:41+00:00): Hi Sam Koenig
I'va changed this road classification to residential
Thank you
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-07-28 07:03:53+00:00): Hi Sam Koenig
I'va changed this road classification of this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40904917 to residential
Thank you
Hjart (2016-07-20 20:30:25+00:00): Ihvertfald i Brøndby Haveby afdeling 1 har dette resulteret i dobbelte adressenoder (med forskellige identifiers og gadenavne ganske vist)
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-07-28 07:18:57+00:00): Hi Sam Koenig
I'va changed this road classification of this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40904962 to residential road
Thank you
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-07-28 07:09:57+00:00): Hi Sam Koenig
I'va changed this road classification of this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/40905091 to residential
Thank you
Vulcanodong (2016-07-21 03:51:23+00:00): the name tag is not a tag but a address
chnav (2016-07-21 04:01:21+00:00): похоже на персональные закладки, часть исправил, часть удалил
literan (2016-07-21 17:12:39+00:00): И что это за дорожка, которая пересекает дом и стройку? Извините, но я это удалю: надо делать или аккуратно или вообще никак
Erelen (2016-07-21 13:41:40+00:00): Если POI является всё здание - следует не ставить точку внутри здания, а навешивать соответствующие теги на всё здание.
GerdP (2017-08-24 13:05:13+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo (?) highway=unpaved
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432248519
Maybe you meant landuse=brownfield?
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Alanduse%3Dbrownfield
GerdP (2017-10-14 09:44:44+00:00): Or maybe it is an amenity=parking?
letihu (2017-03-17 19:00:06+00:00): Kannst Du bitte diesen node
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4258278989/history
an die richtige Stelle verschieben?
Die defekte Wheelmap hat hier wohl einen Fehler gemacht.
naoliv (2016-07-21 04:33:02+00:00): Erick, você AINDA continua editando de forma automática as coisas.
Você por acaso sabe que existem objetos nos caminhos que são dependentes da direção dele?
Você sabe que o JOSM não altera alguns desses obejtos, ficando ERRADOS portanto?
santamariense (2016-07-21 12:55:52+00:00): Acho que seria interessante que informássemos cada edição automática  na lista de e-mail antes de ser executada. Daí os demais mapeadores da comunidade podem propor melhorias nas queries do Overpass para os objetos a serem modificados ou até mesmo negar se for gerar outro problema.
Essa changeset não pode ser revertida?
sputinyk (2016-07-21 12:59:49+00:00): Ok, eu parei com as edições automáticas, sério, não faço mais a a partir de agora. Mas santamariense tem algum erro que vc percebeu? Eu reverti o caminho antes de aplicar o oneway para yes
sputinyk (2016-07-21 13:01:30+00:00): Fui bloqueado do outro por isso estou usando esse outro nome.
naoliv (2016-07-21 13:06:13+00:00): Exemplos de que existem objetos que se tornam errados ao inverter a direção do caminho, e que o JOSM ainda não corrige automaticamente na inversão:
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/10727
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/12537
https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/10260
santamariense (2016-07-21 13:51:58+00:00): Nos lugares que eu vi a direção não foi afetada. Eu digo por experiência própria. Nunca fiz edições automáticas por todo o Brasil, e as que fiz na minha região eu estudo bem as implicações antes de aplicar as modificações, e muitas vezes desisto delas.
Jojo4u (2016-08-07 16:03:35+00:00): Hello AnilT,

I revert the edits to the Magic Roundabout:

- there where overlapping highways  (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/432268534)
- the new highways don't have lane information, i.e. less detail
- the roundabouts are mini-roundabouts, now they are neither roundabout or mini-rounabout
- the shortcut triangles in the inner ring give wrong priority impression
 
added later:
- there was a two highways where no physical separation exists (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435937460)

If you have improvement ideas for the roundabout please discuss beforehand.

Regards, Joachim
Jojo4u (2016-08-07 16:11:52+00:00): Hello AnilT, the correct tag for traffic islands as area is area:highway=traffic_island. I corrected your edit already. For reference see here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area#Tagging

Regards, Joachim
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
Carnildo (2016-07-21 03:13:56+00:00): When you come across an issue like this in the Inland Northwest area of the United States, there's usually more than one problem with the data.  In this case, for example, way #13922679 was simultaneously tagged as a mine, a stream, and two different roads.
ridixcr (2016-07-22 20:39:02+00:00): Hey there!
The tag landuse=quarry is recommended just for points or areas, and as you can see in the changeset comment I was working on broken polygons so that was the reason for removing just the mentioned tag. However if you know better this area, you can please clean up all the incorrect tags in the way. Just for info, I've already reverted my edit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40909243 . 
Thanks for your feedback.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:29:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:29:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:26:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:27:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:29:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-06-06 10:28:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 86274871 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-sourced data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45837736 and previous reports.