piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
MxxCon (2022-09-24 05:00:15+00:00): Hello.
When extracting POI from buildings, please keep "nycdoitt:bin=*" tag on the building since that's the unique id to look it up in NYC's building database.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126548678
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-29 16:29:18+00:00): reverted
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Anon-4 (2022-09-23 13:44:35+00:00): El área residencial no ocupa la correcta superficie ya que estoy fragmentando los cambios en varias partes. En el futuro estará correctamente acotado.
Lennardderudder (2024-04-03 18:44:32+00:00): I was just validating some stuff in JOSM and saw in some of the census boundaries that the ref:name tag was used instead of just the name tag. JOSM was complaining about that so I was wondering why you chose to use the ref:name tag instead of the name tag?
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-04-04 08:25:51+00:00): Hi Lennardderudder,

This was done in communication with the community. These are statistical boundaries; some were added with SETTLEMENT and SETTL_NAME tags then we wanted to fill missing data and to unify the tagging. At that moment, the community was against adding name tags, so we agreed to change the original tags to ref:settlement and ref:name accordingly. I see now that ref:settlement has been changed to ref:IE:census2015 which makes sense. 

It was a part of adding OSi National Statistical Boundaries - 2015 after we obtained the waiver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/PermissionsIreland 

If you have agreed within the community to change it to another tag, I will be glad to help.
EricTheLinguist (2023-01-19 21:13:01+00:00): Your edits are still shifting everything from *=cycleway to *=path. Please hold off until you fix whatever is causing this, because it's overriding sidewalks and clashes with local convention
pkoby (2023-01-19 21:45:37+00:00): Hi Eric,

I finished mapping in Austin four months ago, as you might have seen by the age of the changeset. I changed my mapping practice after your first comment (Oct 3). In discussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126552073 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126548350, I mentioned that you could point out if you found more changesets with issue, as I'm not working back through all my changesets to find them.
pkoby (2023-01-20 00:40:01+00:00): I've gone through all cycleway= to path= that I last touched within Austin and reverted them. Let me know if there's anything I missed.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-23 14:33:07+00:00): Please be sure an object you see is a building. 
the top mapping is not a building
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126550162
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
OldManCelli (2022-09-23 18:26:30+00:00): Hello Namratajk, I think some of the buildings you are creating are not accurate enough. You may want to try using Rapid instead of ID for creating these buildings. I believe that the buildings included in the rapid MS building set are better than the ones you have created. Try this link - https://mapwith.ai/rapid#background=Bing&datasets=fbRoads,msBuildings&disable_features=boundaries&id=w1097294660&map=19.58/30.72593/76.72207
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-23 14:25:04+00:00): Hello. Please read the comments on your mappings.
They are rather sloppy
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126550724
marczoutendijk (2022-09-30 07:41:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097297098
This is a bad example of drawing buildings!
Don't you know that most buildings hav square corners?
Please improve your "namrataedit", whatever it means.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:34:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-23 14:33:13+00:00): Top!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
adrianojbr (2022-09-23 16:50:15+00:00): Olá, Jonathan!

As casas nessa via (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230593224) foram demolidas para ampliação do parque?
EricTheLinguist (2022-10-03 08:23:14+00:00): Local convention has been to tag as highway=cycleway with "foot=designated". Why have you switched the western portion to highway=path? Documentation suggests either is appropriate but local convention should take priority.
pkoby (2022-10-03 12:33:43+00:00): My tagging techniques are evolving throughout this project. I have no longer been retagging cycleways with foot tags for shared-use paths, but some in Austin clearly got caught up. I will review this changeset and revert those unnecessary changes.
EricTheLinguist (2022-10-03 14:00:00+00:00): Ah wonderful. Thank you! This is great work overall and I'm really excited to see more people contribute. I didn't want to just swoop in and run roughshod on your edits too. Cheers!
pkoby (2022-10-03 14:05:25+00:00): No worries! Please let me know if you come across any other issues I might have introduced.
BPTT (2024-04-14 21:42:32+00:00): Hi pkoby, I've found that OpenCycleMap won't render cycleway:both=lane but needs the left and right modifiers. CyclOSM, meanwhile, has no trouble with "both." This obviously doesn't apply to the paths in this changeset, but your project also seems to cover roads, which is great!
adrianojbr (2022-09-23 17:03:43+00:00): Olá, Jonathan!

Você etiquetou alguns edifícios com shop=yes. Entendi que a intenção era indicar que há lojas que operam nesses edifícios. A maneira correta é pelo valor da chave, ficando building=retail. Por isso, procedi essas alterações.

shop=yes é útil quando não se sabe o valor a ser colocado para a chave shop, mas nesse caso é bom incluir name=* e descrição em description=* para ajudar os outros mapeadores a corrigirem.

Abraço.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-23 15:04:48+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=14.595447%2C121.135974%2C18.05
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126552662
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-23 15:06:20+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=14.595447%2C121.135974%2C18.05
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-23 15:09:00+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=14.595447%2C121.135974%2C18.05
kakiremora (2022-09-23 15:44:41+00:00): Please, add descriptions to your changesets
SHARCRASH (2022-09-23 19:53:04+00:00): Yes, please add such descriptions. Like "naturals/volcanos added" is enough for such small changeset.
Frans S (2022-12-18 14:26:05+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. A remark. When you map a road, take the width of that road in considerations.  Narrower than 2 mtr, tag it as a path, otherwise, Unclassified.
I retagged a number into unclassified highways.
Best regards
mendhak (2022-12-18 16:23:37+00:00): Many thanks, I will learn. Makes sense now.
mueschel (2022-10-18 13:16:03+00:00): hi,
it seems like you're using tags like 
wikimedia_commons_1
in many places. 
If it's really necessary to add more than one tag, please use the common spelling with a colon: "XYZ:1", not an underscore.
Also, please check if you can link to a wikimedia commons category instead - that would be very helpful to not clutter OSM with too many links
Bexhill-OSM (2022-10-19 20:43:05+00:00): Thanks for your feedback, I'll look into it soon.
Alex
MadelNL (2025-03-21 14:35:25+00:00): Hoi,

De Rene Bartelsstraat heb ik verwijderd. Ik neem aan dat dit een grapje was. Da's leuk, maar daarvoor is op de gewone kaart van OSM geen ruimte.

Gr. Madel
Nic Gommans (2025-03-29 22:10:11+00:00): Hoi Madel,

Het is misschien een onofficiële naam, maar absoluut geen onacceptabele grap. Namelijk: er staat een opvallend straatnaambord met Rene Bartelsstraat, de werknemers in de omgeving noemen het zo en het is niet bekend onder een andere naam (behalve dat je het zou kunnen zien als onderdeel van de Vogelzankweg). Zie ook: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Good_practice 
"street names and other proper names are generally entered as they appear on signs. (...) the simple default rule is whatever name are used by the people on the ground at that location are used."

Voorstel: als name=Rene Bartelsstraat voor jou niet acceptabel is (ondanks dat het is wat op het bordje staat), dan kunnen we loc_name=Rene Bartelsstraat (of alt_name=Rene Bartelsstraat) gebruiken in combinatie met name=Vogelzankweg.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Local_names_(loc_name)

Met vriendelijke groet,
Nic
MadelNL (2025-03-30 08:01:33+00:00): Beste Nic,

In de 30 jaar dat ik gewerkt heb in deze gemeente, heb ik nog nooit iemand de inrit horen benoemen als Rene Bartelsstraat. Dat misschien anderhalve paardenkop die bij hem werkt, de oprit zo noemt, kan goed .
Zulke opritten worden in de regel al niet ingetekend in de Nederlandse versie van OSM, maar als het dan toch gebeurd, verdient het absoluut de voorkeur om het gewoon Vogelzankweg te noemen.
Dat je er een alternatieve naam aanhangt, is prima.
OSM wordt inmiddels ook gebruikt als navigatiekaart voor de Nederlandse hulpdiensten. Door de oprit een andere naam te geven, zou dat navigatie naar Vogelzankweg 163A onmogelijk maken. Voor klanten is dat niet zo'n probleem, maar als elke seconde telt, kan dat wel een probleem zijn.

Mvg

Madel.
user_2066394 (2022-09-24 21:19:03+00:00): Stimmt "Schloss 1" usw. für Hohenaschau?

Hohenaschau und Prientalmuseum sind eigentlich offiziell in der Kampenwandstraße bzw. der Schloßbergstraße verortet.
LanciaDelta (2022-09-29 20:18:40+00:00): Also meines Wissens geht die Schlossbergstraße nicht bis zum Schloss hinauf. Stimmt, im Internet findet man immer Kampenwandstraße 38 (ist in Wirklichkeit die Tourist-Info) und Schlossbergstraße 1 oder 3 (ist in Wirklichkeit Gewerbegebäude bzw. die ehem. Wirtschaft "Schlosseinkehr"). Laut Bayernatlas werden die einzelnen Gebäudeteile des Schlosses mit "Schloss" 1-4 tituliert. Meiner Meinung nach hat also entweder der Bayernatlas einen Fehler (was zwar sehr selten, mir aber schon mal untergekommen ist) oder das Schloss hat tatsächlich keine richtige Adresse.
Soll ich die Adressen wieder herausnehmen?
user_2066394 (2022-09-30 09:38:56+00:00): Interessant wäre die Hausnummernbeschilderung vor Ort ...
Cafetom (2022-09-25 04:06:44+00:00): Hola jnramirezg! la etiqueta highway=living_street no se debe usar para carreteras en Colombia, esto está en la guía de mapeo de Colombia. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear
jnramirezg (2022-09-25 04:19:13+00:00): No, no estoy de acuerdo. Con la ley 1811 de 2016, aunque no se define, se profundiza en el concepto de prioridad peatonal.
Cafetom (2022-09-25 04:50:10+00:00): La etiqueta highway=living_street corresponde a carreteras bajo una legislación específica que NO existe en Colombia, te invito a que explores nuestra guía de mapeo, allí se discuten las normas con el fin de crear un mapa de Colombia que sea usable, detallado, claro y consistente.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:51+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 126413877, 126414400, 126414436, 126414501, 126414639, 126414739, 126415034, 126415074, 126418412, 126418601, 126418650, 126418744, 126418796, 126419134, 126452223, 126452330, 126452430, 126452523, 126452558, 126452618, 126452725, 126452829, 126452868, 126452914, 126452956, 126453055, 126453100, 126453125, 126454090, 126455020, 126457778, 126457984, 126458913, 126460822, 126468323, 126468364, 126468498, 126468628, 126468714, 126487170, 126487642.
hbede (2022-09-23 18:01:54+00:00): I edited Noccio accidentally...
user_3022894 (2022-09-24 21:25:21+00:00): Hallo Jörg,

vielen Dank für das Ergänzen des GLS-Standortes hier.
Allerdings täuscht die Vorlage im Editor für die GLS-Postfiliale ein bisschen. 

Eigentlich ist sie sehr schön, das Problem dabei ist nur, dass die Vorlage eigentlich nur für eigenständige Postfilialen gedacht ist, bei denen die Postdienstleistungen nicht von einem Dritten wie z. B. einem Kioskbetreiber übernommen werden (diese Art von wirklich eigenständigen Postfilialen gibt es so in DE eigentlich kaum mehr).

Für die klassischen kleinen Postfilialen und Paketshops innerhalb von Kiosken etc., gibt es ein neues Verfahren zum Tagging mit der Verwendung von "post_office", welches direkt an den Kiosk-Punkt getaggt wird.

Das heißt, es wird kein eigenständiger Node mehr für die Postfiliale verwendet. Zugegeben wird das alte Tagging noch verbreitet, sollte aber bei Neueintragungen nicht mehr zur Anwendung kommen.

Das konntest du jedoch nicht wissen und der Editor bietet da auch irgendwie nicht das passende für an - daran wird gerade gearbeitet.

Weitere Informationen findest du auf
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:post_office

Die hier an dem Kiosk selbst anzubringenden Tags wären in diesem Fall für GLS:
shop = kiosk [bereits vorhanden]
post_office = yes
post_office:service_provider = GLS
post_office:service_provider:wikidata = Q366182

Diese Art des Taggings ist wirklich gerade erst neu und z. T. auch etwas kompliziert, ich dachte nur, ich informiere dich trotzdem mal, da dies auch für andere Paketshops relevant ist.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
joel1972 (2022-09-26 06:55:38+00:00): Hallo Lukas,
 
vielen Dank für die Information und die Verlinkung. Ich hatte schon befürchtet, dass der zusätzliche GLS-Eintrag subobtimal ist.  

Im Vorfeld habe ich die Hilfe OSM-Hilfe zum Kiosk besucht und nach einem Tag dafür gesucht. Das post_office war leider noch nicht gelistet und ich war mal so frei und habe es gerade eingetragen. Rechne mit einer Rückmeldung, sollte dies nicht korrekt sein.

Den Eintrag zum Kiosk habe ich angepasst und den zusätzlichen GLS-Punkt entfernt.

Etwas OT: Was passiert, wenn der Kiosk mehrere Postservices anbietet? Habe ich hier im Umfeld schon gesehen.

Schöne Grüße,

Jörg
user_3022894 (2022-09-26 09:24:44+00:00): Hallo Jörg,

prima, das hast du super gemacht, es sieht alles gut aus.

Gute Frage, was dann passiert. Die zwei bzw. mehreren Post-Marken werden dann zusammen als zwei Werte jeweils eingetragen.
Trenner ist jeweils ein Semikolon, hier allerdings, wie eig. immer in OSM, ohne ein (zusätzliches) Leerzeichen einzufügen.

Also zum Beispiel:
post_office:service_provider=GLS;UPS

und ggf. weitere "doppelte Daten" wie post_office:service_provider:wikidata=Q956xxxx;Q5967xxxx

P.S.: Weiß nicht, ob das eventuell sogar hier an dem Kiosk zutreffen könnte - du erwähntest, dass GLS und UPS dort einen Standort haben sollen/könnten.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
Patr1k_P (2022-09-25 10:52:27+00:00): opisne nazvy sa nedavaju, vyjadruje to znacka...a zle si ju kategorizoval, kriz u cesty su vacsinou bozie muky

aj tu treba nazov vymazat a zmenit na bozie muky...okrem toho preco tam je -1? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10047641868
Patr1k_P (2022-09-30 08:09:45+00:00): zle si to pochopil...bozie muky sa znacia takto

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_cross

...je to kriz pri cestach (krestansky)

...druha moznost je kriz, ktory byva vacsinou na vrcholoch a kopcoch

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made=cross

a name treba vymazat
Oregonian3 (2022-09-23 17:19:02+00:00): The USFS official map at https://www.fs.usda.gov/ivm/ has the name of this trail listed differently, as "Donut Falls Connector" for part of it and as "Jordan Pines Connector" for the lower part. I wonder if "Donut Falls Trail" is in common-enough usage for the lower part that it would take precedence over the official name, or if we should go with the USFS map as I've been doing.