piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-04-26 07:55:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Het pad was hier goed gemapt en getagd met access=no  Ook een pad waar niemand mag komen hoort gewoon op de kaart. Dat kan van belang zijn voor hulpdiensten.
Ook het hek zou je op een node kunnen toevoegen met barrier=gate access=no
Het pad waar het verwijderde pad op uitkwam staat ook op access=no  Is dit wel correct?

MVG
eggie



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-04-26 07:57:07+00:00): Aanvulling Grote kand dat een medemapper het pad weer gaat toevoegen, maar dan zonder de tag access=no..

Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-26 08:13:56+00:00): reverted by changeset #120199369

Ik heb je verwijdering even teruggedraaid. Dan kun je evt zelf de barrier=gate met access=no toevoegen op een node.
Tip/.. Gebruik als achtergrond PDOK actueel.. Die is recenter dan BING en lig ook niet verschocen.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-04-26 08:15:10+00:00): Het hek heb ik als voorbeeld toegevoegd
JdenHartog (2022-08-16 11:34:14+00:00): Beste eggie,

Bedankt! Ik denk dat ik het meeste nu begrijp en dat het nu allemaal klopt.

En als antwoord op jouw vraag:
"Het pad waar het verwijderde pad op uitkwam staat ook op access=no Is dit wel correct?"
Ja, alle paden links van mijn change waren ook niet toegankelijk en zouden in mijn ogen wit i.p.v. rood moeten zijn zodat duidelijk is dat er niet gewandeld kan worden.
eggie (2022-08-16 11:43:23+00:00): Oke.... up to you! 😀
JdenHartog (2022-08-16 12:11:30+00:00): Dus als ik die paden op access=no zet worden ze wit i.p.v. rood?
eggie (2022-08-16 12:20:43+00:00): Dat ligt aan de kaart die je gebruikt. Elke kaartenmaker doet het anders. Op de standaardkaart layer worden paden dan minder prominent gerenderd.
Ik kan er dus geen eenduidig antwoord opgeven. Over welke kaart heb je het.?OSM is geen kaart. Dat is een database.
JdenHartog (2022-08-16 12:29:15+00:00): De kaart waar ik nu naar kijk recht van deze chat op https://www.openstreetmap.org en de kaart in "Go Map!!" voor iOS met de *Mapnik only* background.
eggie (2022-08-16 12:50:07+00:00): Path en footway renderen een beetje oranje/rood op de mapnik.. Die beschouwen de meeste mensen als de standaardkaart.
Access=no resulteert dan meer een vaag lijntje. Je kunt access=no dus wel zien.
eggie (2022-08-16 12:51:47+00:00): Sommige kaarten laten soms helemaal geen weg meer zien.
JdenHartog (2022-08-16 13:25:36+00:00): Aha.
Ik heb het hier geprobeerd:
Changeset: 124971552
Even kijken hoe dit uitpakt.
user_5359 (2022-04-25 19:19:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

 Don't add any private information from residential
danieldegroot2 (2022-04-25 21:23:20+00:00): See for more information
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
(Name is the name only, Names are not for descriptions)
ygcgjp5 (2022-05-16 13:49:05+00:00): O važiuojant nuo Kauno iškarto už nuvažiavimo į Vilnių tikrai ne 70?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
user_5359 (2022-05-02 20:31:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1054811222, https://www.osm.org/way/1054811221. One way has NO tag, the other has  the tag highway=Road. Please notice, that ways with the key highway will not shown, if the value of highway isn't known. 

Please correct this. 

If you need help: You are welcome
felipeeugenio (2022-04-25 20:37:04+00:00): Hola
highway=track es algo distinto de lo que estás intentando expresar (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack). track es mas para caminos internos de campos y forestales.
Quizás ese sendero es un path (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath).
Porfa agrega también, si los conoces bien, el surface y el tracktype (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface y https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype)
también el access, por si acaso es privado o libre (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access)

saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120174226
drivec (2022-05-11 02:50:31+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, GPS traces, and observations.
user_5359 (2022-04-25 19:31:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/4657108250/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
philippec (2023-02-19 11:27:43+00:00): Ostende Sailing en Phare East
Dat gebouw daar bestaat toch (al lang) niet meer.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-26 08:56:13+00:00): Please don't just delete it. This looks to be valid, if only improper representation. It's likely a `=strait` or something.
user_8101879 (2022-04-30 17:53:05+00:00): Hi,

- the 2 relations I deleted were empty (no tags) so useless.
- the way was a water area inside a water area so useless : the only interesting thing was the name = Tsing Chau Lek. But this name was the same as the island "Tsing Chau" so I found strange to have 2 times the same name, except the word LEK (瀝) but in google and bing's translate tools this word means nothing.

Finally I chose to put back the name, not as a water area but as a node with "place=locality" : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120394410

Thanks for your comment.

Best regards
user_5359 (2022-05-03 09:14:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on the newest version of your nodes. We use other tags to mark an AED.
philippec (2022-04-25 18:00:11+00:00): Carrefour Gentbrugge aed
Zo in het midden ?
location ?
Glassman (2022-04-28 22:50:05+00:00): Cleaver. I always tell new mappers not to delete old information but to update it to the correct. your the first person to not only do that but keep the history intact. Way to go!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120176337
gscholz (2024-11-23 07:50:59+00:00): Hi Thiago AG,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate nodes and displaced ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-47.02375&lat=-22.84190&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120176423

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
ovruni (2022-04-26 07:25:00+00:00): Hola, etiquetas como equipamiento, group, tipo no son etiquetas. He revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
FrankOverman (2022-05-12 21:03:44+00:00): Het is niet gebruikelijk om in NL zelf gebouwen in te tekenen: daarvoor kan een import verzoek gedaan worden op het forum, zodat deze data uit het kadaster kan komen: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52973&p=428

Als ik dan kijk op deze plek in het kadaster dan is die data (nog) niet beschikbaar.

Ik vraag me daarnaast af of dit construction gebouw al daadwerkelijk in aanbouw is: een gebouw dient pas te verschijnen in OSM als het (begint te) bestaat. Ik zie nog niets op satportaal van 8 mei (die is recent!).

Daarnaast is het ingetekend dwars over de bestaande OSM data. Ook niet gebruikelijk.
Commodoortje (2022-05-16 06:15:22+00:00): Ik heb de contouren laten bestaan, maar de tagging aangepast.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-25 21:58:13+00:00): Hola en este conjunto de cambios indicas Modifico POI, pero se han borrado areas residenciales. ¿Cual es el motivo?
Saludos
ovruni (2022-04-25 19:02:45+00:00): La etiqueta building se encuentra destinada a edificios individuales, no para grupos de edificios. Por otra parte group=3Y4 no es una etiqueta de OSM.
Saludos
nevw (2022-04-26 03:48:22+00:00): Hi
the treed areas bear little resemblance to the real situation with only some patches of trees being mapped.
https://postimg.cc/gallery/Hd3Xwfp
nevw (2022-04-26 06:05:52+00:00): I think the tag natural=wood may be more suitable for areas of trees than tree_row
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-25 18:04:31+00:00): Hola, en sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado etiquetas como group=3Y4, lo cual forma parte de un patrón similar a otras cuentas por la zona, por lo que las he revertido.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú puede hacerla en el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe de la comunidad peruana. 
Saludos
ovruni (2022-04-25 21:59:25+00:00): Aquí lo mismo que en el conjunto de cambios 120177259.
SherbetS (2022-05-16 02:10:42+00:00): asdfjkll, why did you change the wetland objects to woods?
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2022-05-16 02:23:36+00:00): The majority of it doesn't look like a wetland (couldn't see much water under the trees like in other wetland areas). When the landcovering gets over here the area shall get addressed again to check for waterlogged forests.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-25 19:03:26+00:00): La clave group no es una valor de OSM. Revierto este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Amr@Gis (2022-04-26 13:11:36+00:00): Hello ArleneC;
 I noticed you split some streets with the wrong way which led to making it disconnected and floating from any highway.
 There is a new track" Mapillary" showing that the streets already exist.
Could you fix your edit in this area as it was, please?
Example link for the issues:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4714243774/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5847453864/history
Mapillary track:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=26.224448203896&lng=50.611838180358&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=711820109974369&mapStyle=Mapillary+satellite
Regards
Amr@Gis
ArleneC (2022-04-26 16:28:23+00:00): Thank you for catching this. It has been corrected.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:30:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ottwiz (2022-04-25 18:31:12+00:00): I removed the bridge=yes because on Imagery (like Bing) it's only a bridge where it crosses the stream
turepalsson (2022-05-11 08:56:00+00:00): Relation  7622871 har råkat bli medlem i sig själv.
archpdx (2022-04-25 19:14:17+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for adding this new street! However, please note that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM (see https://wiki.osm.org/abbreviation). In this case, this should be unabbreviate to 'Primrose Street'.
archpdx (2022-04-25 19:16:34+00:00): *unabbreviated
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
ovruni (2022-04-25 19:04:34+00:00): Este es el area de colegio, no el edificio. Revierto este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
LockOnGuy (2022-05-17 04:29:42+00:00): Hello Msalmanq, you changed the road name to a wrong name, the street name is "شارع غازي" it is the current and official name.      
Source:  https://www.amanatbaghdad.gov.iq/admin/uploads/7545960384-6f1e86048ae5b44f30f6be5546120d35.jpg          
From:     https://amanatbaghdad.gov.iq/page.php?link=Rusafa%20municipality&lang=ar          
No worries, I'll fix it.    
Best regards.
Msalmanq (2022-05-20 23:51:46+00:00): Hello LockOnGuy, thank you for your edits!
Hind (2022-04-25 18:39:03+00:00): О, контрибьютор осм в Фетхие :3
Tim Apelov (2022-04-25 19:48:40+00:00): Ну не на долго, но да, по чуть-чуть вношу
Mammi71 (2023-04-02 13:54:46+00:00): Hallo Axel-A,
kann es sein, dass nach dem Eintragen dieser Wetterstation die andere, fast deckungsgleiche Wetterstation https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304242132 gelöscht werden kann. Genaugenommen müsstest Du Deine Wetterstation löschen und die Daten zum Erhalt der Historie an die bereits seit 8 Jahren vorhandene Wetterstation ergänzen.
eggie (2022-04-26 09:18:43+00:00): Beste AjdeH   
De landuse heb ik losgemaakt van de highway=turning_circle

Je pad had je ook verbonden met de hoogspanningskabel. Ieder die hier loopt staat onder spanning van 220000 Volt.  :)
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=120178929

MVG
eggie
jmapb (2022-05-13 17:47:01+00:00): Do you know if  Doyers is oneway for bikes? I was here yesterday and saw "no entry expect bicycles" signage on the south end, which would seem to suggest that it isn't.
TheBestIdea (2022-05-31 17:33:44+00:00): Sorry for the delay in getting back. Sounds ambiguous given that, I assume, the normal one way signs have not been removed. I've found that the openstreet signage is not always consistently deployed so I haven't been changing oneway info. I would imagine two way bike traffic is at minimum tolerated.
martien-176 (2022-04-26 18:34:41+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of your mappings. 

They are quite well mapped. But please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. For the round buildings you should use the 'o' key. 

Keep up the mapping - many thanks! Kind regards, Martien Global Validator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120179050
Firefishy (2022-04-25 20:55:40+00:00): Awesome set of first edits! Thank you for making OSM awesome. Happy mapping.
olo81 (2022-05-17 15:05:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054844646#map=18/52.41804/16.90716
Pasy dla autobusów nie są osobnymi drogami, są dla nich odpowiednie tagi. Druga sprawa to że nie dałeś węzłów na przecięciu dróg. Jeśli drogi czy tory tramwajowe są na jednym poziomie dajemy węzły na przecięciach i ewentualnie dodatkowe tagi. 
Pobieżnie przeglądając okolicę widzę że brak przecięć jest nagminny w Poznaniu.
DaveF (2022-04-27 19:10:20+00:00): Please don't amend the Cotswold AONB boundary. Don't attach an entities to it (residential in this changeset).
The AONB is set by Natural England & should not be manipulated to suit what OSM contributors believe to be accurate.
Robert Whittaker (2022-04-28 11:04:28+00:00): I've detached the AONB boundary and put it back to the Natural England GeoJSON dataset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120298934 .

I'm not sure it's settled that such boundaries shouldn't be attached to other objects when they are indeed coterminous. In general I would expect common boundaries to share the same nodes, though I can see practical reasons for not wanting to do so here.

More importantly, the reason I moved the boundary was to align it with the Land Registry Index Polygons around the edge of Alderton. Almost certainly this is what the AONB boundary should be aligned to. However, it looks like the data from Natural England has an offset of a metre or so from this -- possibly due to coordinate transformation errors. How confident are you that the Natural England data is correct, and are their GIS files definitive anyway?
d1sr4n (2022-05-10 00:27:01+00:00): Что именно вы тут корректировали и зачем?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Commodoortje (2022-04-25 20:22:27+00:00): Wellicht had je de historie van de vorige uitvoering en ligging kunnen behouden.
Je hebt nu verwijderd en opnieuw getekend, waardoor de historie verloren gaat.

Het is geen doodzonde, maar meer respect voor de historie.
Dannox (2022-04-25 20:27:03+00:00): Dat wist is niet. Mijn excuses hiervoor. Mocht je het willen terugdraaien dan mag dit. Dan teken ik het wel even opnieuw :)
Commodoortje (2022-04-26 03:31:14+00:00): Geeft niet, meer een puntje van aandacht. Soms gaat het ook niet om de historie te behouden.
Wellicht zou je onderstaande link kunnen lezen om de algemene regels te begrijpen. ;-)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice

Succes, met mappen, het verbeteren van OSM is ons gezamenlijke doel.
MxxCon (2022-04-26 05:23:34+00:00): Hello.
Please note that NYSE is already mapped. As such this node is going to be deleted since it goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120179582
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-06-25 19:55:30+00:00): please, dont add personal info, only public info
user_5359 (2022-04-25 19:15:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM!  Short inquiry to the key service_times: the services are held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case add a Su (followed by space character) at the beginning of the value. Please notice also: We use the 24h notation for time informations.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-26 01:56:13+00:00): Hole number shouldn't go in the name.
bisonprarieafternoon (2022-04-26 16:07:49+00:00): These shouldn't be marked as buildings, an area with building=* should only include the actual physical building. These should be marked as

landuse=residential
residential=apartments

and probably include the parking lots with it as i assume these are all part of the Crimson Villas complex.
Frans S (2022-05-10 13:06:19+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
The standard Imagery for this project is Maxar P. Please change this.
: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
B: Overlapping buildings drawn.
C: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120180112
danieldegroot2 (2022-04-25 19:29:16+00:00): Reverted changesets: 120170622 120170533 120170432 120170256 120170062 120169901 120169688 15172478

Changeset comments: 120170622 15172478
TheNet1996 (2022-04-26 21:11:21+00:00): Servus!
Willkommen bei OSM und Danke, dass du die Karten mit verbessern möchtest :)

In diesem Fall war die Hausnummer 44 schon erfasst und zwar am Eingang des Gebäudes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/739860897

Somit ist eine Hausnummernvergabe am Gebäude nicht nötig bzw. sollte vermieden werden.

Viele Grüße
Mike
darubyruby (2022-04-26 21:24:58+00:00): Hey mike,

danke für deinen Hinweis.
Gibt es eine Regel wann man einem Eingang eine Adresse zuweist und wann einem Gebäude?

Ich mache die Änderung gleich rückgängig.

Gruß
Stephan
TheNet1996 (2022-04-28 05:05:42+00:00): Hallo Stephan,
eine feste Regel gibt es nicht.
Wenn allerdings ein Gebäudekomplex mit mehreren Hauseingängen existiert, macht es natürlich Sinn die Hausnummer auf den Eingang zu mappen, z.B. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59640447/

Auch ist das Routing zur "Hausnummer auf Eingang" etwas genauer, wenn sich z.B. der Hauseingang irgendwo im Hinterhof befindet. Hier sollten natürlich die Wege zusätzlich gemappt werden, damit das Routing zur Haustüre funktionieren kann.

Viele Grüße
Mike
martien-176 (2022-04-26 18:31:05+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of your mappings. They are quite well mapped. But please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. For the round buildings you should use the 'o' key. Keep up the mapping - many thanks! Kind regards, Martien Global Validator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120181142
Joseph R P (2022-04-27 01:40:49+00:00): Hello, this section of VA 7 has one interchange and is quite short, it shouldn't be a motorway.
martinst (2022-04-25 21:13:01+00:00): Wäre das nicht besser bei inscription= oder description= eingetragen? name=* ist nur für Eigennamen.
santon (2022-04-27 14:59:50+00:00): Stimmt, ich ein bisschen in Hektik :-(
Firefishy (2022-04-25 20:54:13+00:00): Very nice set of first edits! Thank you for helping make the map great. Happy mapping.
user_5359 (2022-04-26 18:06:08+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1054841885 (only for example). You forgot to add any highway key for your gpx tracks.