piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-08-24 17:28:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту  [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
Номер телефона нужно указывать в международном формате, например +7 3452 687300  [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone].  
  
Чтобы ответить на это сообщение, вам нужно перейти по ссылке на сайт OpenStreetMap. Затем войти под своей учётной записью и написать комментарий на сайте в пустое поле в разделе "Обсуждение".  
  
Если у вас возникли какие-либо вопросы, то вы можете задать их на форуме [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21].
Frans S (2017-08-23 10:45:15+00:00): hallo. I'm new here, so I have to learn a lot.
one question. I notice that in the area I am editing the mapped some buildings or roads does not exact follow the outlines of the subject. Is this a limitation in accuracy or should I correct these ?
Frans
snigdhap (2019-02-27 08:43:20+00:00): "Hi Aisah,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the way 490843955
way 490843946 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, the area around seems to be 'Residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
lleung (2017-09-02 11:57:56+00:00): alley 是可以行车的，只能行人的用 footpath
Athalis (2017-08-24 22:40:09+00:00): I think the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2826111512 needs to be updated / removed, can you take a look at this again?
Athalis (2017-08-30 20:28:26+00:00): has been fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51545076
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:48:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
_fabian_ (2017-08-23 09:58:38+00:00): vari errori sulla mappa (intersezioni etc.)
literan (2017-08-23 11:58:12+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за правки, но к вам пара просьб. 1) не писать в тег name все подряд (вроде "деревянный настил") - это тег только для имен собственных. 2) не расставлять на тропы, дорожки, дороги хаотично теги bicycle=yes, foot=yes , почему - написано в моем профиле. Я сейчас все это исправлю.
TheOutpost (2017-08-28 17:55:47+00:00): There has been a building dragged into the Arctic Ocean from Africa. I think there was a mistake made.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
saikabhi (2017-08-23 09:51:08+00:00): Wrong comment: Added turn restrictions and dual carriageways in Los Angeles
saikabhi (2017-08-23 09:50:58+00:00): Wrong comment: Added turn restrictions and dual carriageways in Los Angeles
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:48:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
SomeoneElse (2017-08-24 15:26:11+00:00): Hello,
This is a very large changeset with relatively few items in it.  How can I see which objects in it are near me?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend
literan (2017-08-23 12:37:40+00:00): капсом писать не надо. Попробуйте еще раз
Sysem (2017-09-27 14:05:22+00:00): Hi,
ich vermute einen Zahlendreher in der Postleitzahl. Kannst du deine Änderung bitte überprüfen, danke.
=> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235033806
Yazhubal (2017-09-30 08:01:03+00:00): Fixed, thanks for the info! ;)
Sysem (2017-09-30 17:40:37+00:00): danke ;)
Regina Phalange (2017-08-24 10:20:20+00:00): I meant "fuel" station, damn keyboard...
Nakaner (2017-08-23 21:31:00+00:00): Hi,

the changeset comment of this changeset claims that this changeset is part of project number 67 on the HOT Tasking Manager. I had a look at the description of this task and there are two strange things:

1. You added buildings in Maluku Utara but the description says that the area of interest is Manokwari, West Papua.

2. The buildings you added do not match any imagery which is currently available for OSM (i.e. we have the explicit permission to use it for tracing objects).

Please answer these questions before you upload any other changesets.

Best regards

Michael
Febry Laeloma (2017-08-24 00:06:01+00:00): Hi, sorry if i've made a mess.
1. I know the title of project 67 is north halmahera district in northern maluku province and I am following Mapping Party activities organized by National Agency for Disaster Management (BNPB) Indonesia to map priority areas of RPJMN so I choose north halmahera. Then I mapped using Java OpenStreetMap software and only mapped buildings, roads, and rivers.
2. I use bing image on Java OpenStreetMap software and map the image of the building and the river by filling the description column of building = yes and water = river for North Halmahera.
Sorry if I've made a big mess. Please allow me to be able to map again to other BNPB RPJMN priority areas because I have to map many buildings, roads and rivers for the Mapping Party event to end on 22 September 2017
Nakaner (2017-08-24 21:41:46+00:00): Hi,

thank you for your response.

I was wondering because http://tasks.hotosm.org/project/67 shows a totally different area.

The quality of your drawing is good and does not give any reason to complain. I have to apologize for my question which imagery you used. This question was accidentially copied from another comment. 

Did the upload of your changeset break accidentially? There are lots of unconnected nodes. Just open the area  of this changeset in JOSM and have a look.

Best regards

Michael
Febry Laeloma (2017-08-25 00:20:15+00:00): hi, thank you. I am still in the process of learning the map using openstreetmap. For the next time I will try better.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-18 22:24:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58217008 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors everywhere except North and South America. They &quot;fixed&quot; routing &quot;errors&quot; but hided real errors instead of fixing them. See also https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964
Sanniu (2017-10-10 06:10:54+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517938517 - is it roundabout?
eggie (2018-11-13 12:01:46+00:00): De eerste edit buiten Nederland en daardoor nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog  Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
dgitto (2017-08-23 13:13:15+00:00): what is this area=yes?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517940399
dgitto (2017-08-23 13:13:49+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
Heinz_V (2017-08-31 05:13:12+00:00): You mapped a lot of highway=roads where there is only the border of a field.
Please delete these non existing roads.
You have been in this region and made records of GPX-tracks???
If yes, then please upload them else don't write that you used local GPX
Владимир К (2018-08-16 08:23:24+00:00): Зачем вы добавляете в addr:suburb старые названия улиц? старые названия улиц надо указывать в old_name=* на линии самой улицы.
Porsche84 (2018-08-16 11:28:33+00:00): В Махачкале постоянно переименовываются улицы и есть много одноименных, и если добавить субурб район города или старое название это упрощает пользование картой ОСМ на автонавигаторах, вы можете сказать, что это неправильно и нужно делать  как положено. Но в этом случае каждый останется при своем мнении
Владимир К (2018-08-16 11:37:28+00:00): может вы и останетесь при своем мнении, только вот я например сношу всё эти сабербы со зданий десятками и ставлю олднейм на улицу уже не один год. Просто потому что в вики прописан другой кейс использования этих тегов. И, заметьте, если бы у вас не спросил, то даже не узнал бы, что это не ошибка, а так задумано и надо.  Может лучше вам подстроить конвертер под правильные теги по документации?
Sanniu (2017-10-10 06:10:45+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517946631, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517938516 - are they roundabouts?
BeKri (2017-12-05 23:46:15+00:00): Du hast sicher eine gute Begründung,
wodurch sich dieser viewpoint von
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5052282123
unterscheidet, den Du einen Monat vorher eingetragen hast ... ?
Außer den Namen ?
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:48:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
rickmastfan67 (2017-11-28 06:42:11+00:00): Do you have any 'proof' that I-69 has been posted South of I-24 yet?  The following article pretty much says it HASN'T been posted yet, but will be next year, but only down as far as Wingo (Exit #14). So, do you have any photographic proof of the shields being up (Future Corridor signage doesn't count)?
rickmastfan67 (2017-11-28 06:44:07+00:00): Whoops, forgot the news article link: http://www.wpsdlocal6.com/2017/11/22/69-progress-make-better-2018-holiday-travels/
gileri (2017-08-24 06:22:34+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention des horaires incorrectes avaient été ajoutés au nœud suivant :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/508913169

Je les ai retirés
Alecs01 (2017-08-23 15:14:53+00:00): Ciao Tommaso, credo ci sia qualche problema con la app StreetComplete, hai inserito dei numeri civici senza la strada (addr:housenumber) che è fondamentale, alcuni civici peraltro erano già mappati, come questi due: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368108338/history e http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495683304/history. Considera inoltre che per convenzione in Italia per i numeri civici si preferisce usare un punto anzichè mettere l'indirizzo sull'intero indirizzo, sia perchè il numero civico rappresenta un ingresso e non un edificio, sia perchè un edificio può avere più ingressi con civici diversi.
Tommasky (2017-08-23 16:08:13+00:00): Ho capito, grazie dell'avviso! Mi sono fidato dell'applicazione, ma evidentemente non è perfetta... Vedrò di stare più attento la prossima volta. Spero non sia un grosso problema.
Constable (2017-08-24 12:09:04+00:00): Hi there; I don't think this parking is located in the middle of that road, would you be so kind to move it to a more appropriate position?
If you need some help figuring how the editor works please ask here.
Thanks for your help!
Cheers
ma-rt-in (2017-08-25 08:03:57+00:00): Hi,
warum hast du das ref der "alten" B51 entfernt. Wurde die Straße bereits abgestuft? Ich denke nicht, da der LBM dazu noch keine Info gegeben hat.
XY22 (2017-08-25 14:05:59+00:00): Hallo ma-rt-in,
ich habe die alten ref entfernt, weil die B51 laut Beschilderung vor Ort auschließlich über die neue Trasse geht. Die alten Schilder wurden ausgetauscht. Ein Teil der alten Trasse wurde gesperrt. Ob die alte Straße bereits offiziell abgestuft wurde weiß ich nicht.
mueschel (2017-08-25 10:59:40+00:00): Hi,
why did you delete so many existing buildings and redraw them? In general, this is considered bad practice because it delete the history of an object. 

I also doubt that all these buildings actually have this shape - most buildings are rectangular.

Third, you added the tag "building=residential" to all nodes of each building - the tag should only be on the building itself, not on its nodes.

Last, what is the meaning of the tag "inserito=aggiunto"? 

Jan
GeorgeKaplan (2017-08-27 10:59:57+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a un petit problème avec cette fusion : il y a maintenant les nodes d'un des ways dans cette relation, il faut les retirer.
Adrien G (2017-08-28 05:15:27+00:00): Bonjour,
Effectivement il y a une erreur. J'ai corrigé le tir.
Bonne journée
Adrien
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
Mike Baggaley (2017-08-24 17:25:57+00:00): HI I realise you have simply split part of the Black Brook Way footpath to add a bridge, but assume you have some knowledge of the area. This path has foot=public on each segment, which is not a valid value. Are you in a position to correct this?

Thanks,
Mike
krd_mapper (2017-08-24 18:34:37+00:00): Thanks Mike.  Yes, I work for Charnwood Borough Council so am familiar with the area.  Well spotted on the footpath tags, I'll sort them out when I get a chance.  Regards...Kev
HubMiner (2017-09-16 04:47:24+00:00): Hi, can you provide more info about this change: you deleted a many turn relations I created/updated.  Please share how you determined what should be deleted.
Thanks.
florinbadita_telenav (2017-09-18 12:01:14+00:00): Hi, because of the creation of the dual carriageway, a lot of the Turn Restriction had become superfluous 

No Left Turn going into a oneway street, etc
Владимир К (2017-08-24 07:27:55+00:00): откатываю
Mike - Oklahoma County Assessor (2017-08-23 17:24:49+00:00): City of Harrah now says they were wrong, no change required
Mike - Oklahoma County Assessor (2017-08-23 17:25:13+00:00): City of Harrah now says they were wrong, no change required.
Richard Dalaqua (2017-10-07 21:33:59+00:00): Boas contribuições!
eggie (2019-05-24 08:49:58+00:00): De eerste edits buiten Nederland voor Missing maps  daardoor er tussendoor geglipt met de welkomstmail. Bij deze alsnog... Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
nvk (2017-09-18 17:44:06+00:00): Can you tell me more about this edit? I've driven across the bridge as recently as last weekend and have never seen this cemetery! It is a bit funny (and is very detailed, might be useful for something like Pokemon Go?), but if it's not real this feature should probably be removed.
nvk (2017-09-19 20:49:13+00:00): Giving this another 24 hours then planning to delete feature.
nvk (2017-09-28 15:47:06+00:00): 9 days, deleting this now
Nakaner (2017-08-23 21:18:53+00:00): Hi,

did you have a look at the data and check if it looks ok before you uploaded it?

Best regards

Michael
J N Squire (2017-08-25 15:36:55+00:00): Yes, I did look at it. It took me days on JOSM to prepare it. Some things have been edited after upload with the web editor if I thought it would be faster to clean up in such ways. :)
alphensebezorger (2017-08-23 19:35:35+00:00): Hallo thebigbrick,

Geldt dat eenrichtingsverkeer ook voor fietsers? En bromfietsers? Er liep namelijk een (knooppunten)fietsroute (76-77) over deze straat. Of is die route veranderd?
Kun je de borden eens precies bekijken?
Om aan te geven dat het eenrichtingsverkeer niet voor fietsers geldt, kun je de tag "oneway:bicycle=no" toevoegen aan de straat. In de iD-editor (de standaardeditor op openstreetmap.org) kun je dat toevoegen via het plusteken onder "Alle tags".
Alvast bedankt voor de moeite, alphensebezorger.
thebigbrick (2017-08-23 20:17:35+00:00): Deze eenrichtingsweg geldt niet voor fietsers/brommers. Hij staat als het goed is nu goed gemarkeerd. Ik was even vergeten dat detail toe te voegen, bedankt voor de herinnering! -brick
sander79 (2017-08-24 06:50:05+00:00): wederom de vraag of dit ook voor fietsers van toepassing is. Waarschijnlijk niet. Graag aanpassen. (incl je vorige wijziging)

Als je hulp nodig hebt kan je het altijd vragen. Ook het forum kan daarvoor gebruikt worden.
ThidoA (2017-08-24 08:14:15+00:00): Er staat geen uitzondering voor fietsers bij het eenrichtingsverkeer, dus ik ga er van uit dat het (officieel) ook voor fietsers geldt...

Ik kan trouwens ook niet vinden waar ik dit zou kunnen aangeven, is geen optie die ik heb kunnen vinden
sander79 (2017-12-01 16:53:48+00:00): Ik heb net even gekeken en bij alle 3 de straten hangt een bord dat eenrichtingsverkeer niet voor fieters geldt.
Dit heb ik bijgewerkt in osm.

Mocht je volgende keer zo'n situatie tegenkomen kan je dit mappen met:
oneway:bicycle=no
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-09 22:56:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 51890800, 51894086, 51892760, 51889245, 51890034, 51891226, 51893828, 51893158, 51891654, 51893514, 51888634, 51892002, 51892379 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/tracing from Instituto Geográfico Militar. User cartosmapas did not answer my questions but read the user block message. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1468
Nakaner (2017-08-23 21:34:05+00:00): Hi Feldo,

the Import Guidelines say that imports must be done using a dedicated account. This account does not look to be an import-only account. That's why I ask you to create a dedicated import account for any further upload of the Canvec import or any other import.

You can find the guideline at the OSM wiki at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

Best regards

Michael
J N Squire (2017-08-25 15:02:41+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for the link. I didn't know about this.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-09 22:56:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 51890800, 51894086, 51892760, 51889245, 51890034, 51891226, 51893828, 51893158, 51891654, 51893514, 51888634, 51892002, 51892379 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import/tracing from Instituto Geográfico Militar. User cartosmapas did not answer my questions but read the user block message. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1468
philippec (2019-07-15 16:21:31+00:00): Is verplaatst, hoop ik.
pitscheplatsch (2019-08-29 11:53:16+00:00): Hi k-ham,

wieso wurden mit diesem Changeset an den folgenden Weg ein bicycle=no hinzugefügt? Konnte gestern hier lokal kein entsprechendes Verbotsschild am Weg sehen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37794571

Danke & Viele Grüße
Pascal
normalisdesned (2019-08-31 15:29:47+00:00): Hallo Pascal,
Es steht an den meisten Parkplätzen im Nationalpark ein Schild dass das Radfahren auf allen Wegen verboten ist. Außenahmen sind durch Radfahrwegweiser gekennzeichnet. Da der Radweg hier laut Wegweiser aber zur Kühroint Alm abbiegt, ist das Radfahren dort wieder verboten.
Gruß
pitscheplatsch (2019-09-03 16:13:21+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort.
Mit dem Schildern ist es so eine Sache hier in der Gegend. Manchmal steht an einem Weg nur einmal ein Schild. Z.B. von der einen Seite aus. Bin jetzt ein paar Wege gefahren, wo eingangs kein Schild, beim Verlassen aber wieder ein Schild "Nur für Fussgänger" angebracht war.
eggie (2018-12-22 09:43:24+00:00): De eerste edits buiten Nederland voor HOT OSM.. daarom nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze dus alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap Nederland. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
StephaneP (2019-02-07 17:06:39+00:00): Bonjour Shohreh,
Oui, je sais, c'est un vieux changeset :-)
La relation indiquant le cedez-le-passage pour les vélo n'a comme membre, que le feux rouge. Est-ce que tu souviens de ce que pourrais être les membres "from" et "to" ? Parce qu'en l'état, on ne sait pas, et elle devient inutilisable.

A bientôt
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Shohreh (2019-02-07 20:17:59+00:00): À Paris, à l'exception d'une expérimentation dans le 10ème, on ne trouve que des tourne-à-droite et des va-tout-droit, selon le type de carrefour.
StephaneP (2019-02-08 16:45:11+00:00): Heu d'accord, mais ça ne rend pas la relation valide pour autant. Je veux dire par là qu'un logiciel de navigation, c'est bête, et il ne pourra pas en ternir compte s'il n'y a pas les membres from et to.
StephaneP (2019-02-08 16:53:51+00:00): Ok, je viens de voir ta discussion avec Charles. A la limite, si tu ne sais pas comment ajouter les membre from et to, ajoute une description ou un fixme dans la relation, pour indiquer de quel type (tourne à droite, va tout droit) il s'agit, et à partir de quel endroit. Exemple pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7501651
En arrivant de la rue Claude terrasse (DSC), tourne à droite possible vers le Boulevard Murat.
Shohreh (2019-02-08 19:14:40+00:00): Je sais le faire, maiis 1. c'est trop lourd même avec JOSM (à moins qu'il n'existe une astuce ?) et 2. dans les cas où les ways n'ont pas été séparées, il faut au préalable les redessiner afin de pouvoir sélectionner individuellement les from et to.

J'ai donc laissé tomber, à charge à d'autres de poursuivre :-)
StephaneP (2019-02-09 12:51:28+00:00): Il n'y a rien à redessiner, il faut juste couper la voie à l'intersection.
Je vais tenter de t'expliquer la manip en passant par la messagerie privée.
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:35:41+00:00): Olá, andresgarcia_am.
Nesta sua edição você criou 2 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Владимир К (2017-11-03 08:02:37+00:00): я хочу обратить внимание на это место
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/518051946#map=18/55.54297/37.49475&layers=D

школа обозначена совсем неправильно.

Вот написано, как нужно
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dschool
user_5359 (2017-10-13 17:03:40+00:00): Hallo! Du hast sehr viele Beschreibungen von Punkten in den Schlüssel name geschrieben. Diese gehören aber normalerweise in description (nicht in note, hier gehören nur Hinweise zur weiteren Bearbeitung rein). 
Beispiel Knoten 4838172448 heißt "Rossweide 1, südöstlich des Hofes, nur für Tragkraftspritze geeignet. " dies ist eindeutig eine Beschreibung.

Willst Du das ändern oder soll ich Dich unterstützen?
feuerwehrbichl (2017-10-13 18:08:47+00:00): Hallo das ist Absicht. Weil der Name in der Kurzinformation im Web und beim Ausdruck als Hydrantenplan angezeigt wird. Die Beschreibung aber nicht. Deshalb der Umweg über das Namensfeld.
user_5359 (2017-10-13 18:14:12+00:00): Sorry, aber das ist ein Missbrauch von Feldern, nur weil die Standardkarte das nicht anders darstellt. Das Keywort hier ist Standardkarte, kennst Du schon die Abfragemöglichkeit mit der Overpass-turbo.eu Seite? Dort kann man alle Informationen abfragen. Und für einen Ausdruck dürfte es sowieso besser sein, nur das Tag ref auszudrucken (damit auch wirklich alles angezeigt wird, denn Texte können sich auch verdrängen) und die Beschreibungen separat auszudrucken (siehe obige Webseite)
Jose Luis Infante (2018-05-21 02:28:58+00:00): Hola,
veo por las imágenes que es una zona que ha tenido movimiento de obras, aunque me parece extraño que se haya eliminado totalmente la vía. Si es cierto, has dejado sin borrar los pasos de peatones de la vía borrada.
Un saludo!
Dreamboy737 (2018-05-21 08:40:18+00:00): Hola,
Si, es correcto. Se ha eliminado toda la calle y se ha modificado toda la zona. Ahora se accede al barrio por la nueva calle que se ha construido más al este. Junto al Lidl, donde había la calle de acceso antigua, se esta construyendo un gran centro comercial. No me fijé en los pasos de peatones. Gracias!