piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lee Carré (2022-03-10 21:39:16+00:00): “change set uses version 2.20.2 when we're on 2.20.4”

👍. Eagle-eyed SekeRob strikes again.


“stale browser application cache.”

Depends what the caching-related HTTP headers have declared. If the browser has been told that it may use the resources for a year+ (without re-checking with the server), then (strictly) the cache isn't stale (even though the data within is outdated, in this case).

Which, from a Web-dev PoV, indicates that this wasn't thought about in iD's implementation (or possibly how it's been deployed on the host site; which goes back to how iD has been implemented).

Users shouldn't have to (know (how) to) flush their HTTP cache (think about those behind shared caches, administered by someone else, which they can't flush).
Even if they did know; when are they supposed to, or how would they know when to (without being expected to watch the GH repo)?
Having to manually flush cache is a workaround or troubleshooting step. Shouldn't be part of normal operations. Caching (done correctly) is good. Flushing an entire cache (adversely) affects other sites.

The naive retort (of developers) would be ‘how are we supposed to know how to set the caching headers, since we don't know when we'll release a new version?’.

Well, firstly, regularly scheduled releases (say, monthly) wouldn't be a bad idea.

However, the strategy which is commonly used with images is (in simplified terms) to set long-lived caching headers on each image. If there's need to change which image is used, then point to a another one at a different URL, with the HTML set to have relatively short-lived caching headers.
If a script is selecting images, then give it the conditional logic to figure out which image is the right on, among a set.

For iD, there could be a small file for checking version, which has headers declaring it to be cached only for somewhere between an hour and a day (I'll let the server admins determine that), and then differently-versioned files of iD sit at different URLs (perhaps use the version-number in the URL), which each have long-lived caching headers.
The version file points to the current stable version (or uses a mini-language, or a terse well-known language (JSON?), to specify each of stable, previous, beta testing, development, or whatever the developers / admins wish).

If things are done sensibly, then it should be possible to invoke different versions of iD (for testing purposes) by hacking the URL.

Besides easily testing for regressions, keen users could also easily test beta / development / nightly versions.

I'll open a ticket at iD's repo.
Lee Carré (2022-03-10 22:16:17+00:00): “I'll open a ticket at iD's repo.”

http://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/9028
Lee Carré (2022-03-10 23:21:43+00:00): “version 2.20.2 when we're on 2.20.4 suggesting a stale browser application cache”

Or not, having noticed that
host=https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/12003/map/

So, may be that HOTOSM simply haven't updated their version.
Lee Carré (2022-03-10 23:35:51+00:00): Maybe a report needs to be opened at http://github.com/hotosm/tasking-manager instead, to simply request them to import the newer version of iD (and to automate future imports).

But, it's late (23:35) and brain says it's time to sleep.
Lee Carré (2022-03-12 23:08:33+00:00): iD repo triager confirmed my suspicion, so I opened http://github.com/hotosm/tasking-manager/issues/5038
SekeRob (2022-03-13 18:12:07+00:00): Whatever the problem is, observed this morning, and your investigation now having put me in the know of those hashtag meanings, a fresh edit set using hotosm with 2.20.1 in the references.
mueschel (2022-03-13 10:54:21+00:00): Hi,
please check these two areas, they have no common OSM tag:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038337912
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1038337963
user_5359 (2022-03-15 08:30:43+00:00): As a small reminder, the question of meaning again. 

Como um pequeno lembrete, a questão do significado novamente.
danctc (2022-03-21 23:39:02+00:00): Hi, 
I ended up not getting notification of this changest, I will correct now.
praeteritum (2023-05-17 05:56:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136194506.
praeteritum (2023-05-16 07:07:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136153521.
Polarbear-repair (2022-03-09 19:47:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118292452 where the changeset comment is: revert fictional golf course mapping, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5752
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-08 20:08:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 118035043, 118035242, 118035284, 118035352, 118035393, 118035510, 118035537, 118035617, 118035663, 118035707, 118234873, 118235074, 118235124, 118235202, 118235272, 118235353, 118235414, 118235613, 118235708, 118235785, 118235803, 118235897, 118235935, 118236265, 118236373, 118236434, 118236540, 118236644, 118236717, 118236813, 118236862, 118236894, 118236942, 118236969, 118237156, 118237226, 118237420, 118237560, 118237647, 118237728, 118237881, 118238006, 118238264, 118238307, 118238368, 118238411, 118238468, 118238508, 118238594, 118243355, 118243507, 118243682, 118243810, 118243905, 118243976, 118244062, 118244152, 118244190, 118244232, 118244311, 118244380, 118244475, 118244502, 118244515, 118244580, 118244623, 118244703, 118244847, 118244910, 118244935, 118244997, 118245023, 118245043, 118245071, 118245257, 118245286, 118245384, 118245486, 118245509, 118245545, 118245552, 118245643, 118245700, 118245784, 118245846, 118245895, 118245925, 118245966, 118246118, 118246196, 118246250, 118246305, 118246417, 118246525, 118246650, 118246690, 118246726, 118246764, 118246801, 118246844, 118246881, 118246923, 118247011, 118249925, 118249962, 118249983, 118249993, 118250028, 118250064.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
◪ Jarv (2022-03-09 01:08:37+00:00): This looks to me like a waste water treatment plant (aka. sewage works), rather than a water treatment plant.
praeteritum (2023-05-15 00:44:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136104527.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-29 05:44:53+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import by OEG, possibly using unauthorised data sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522524
praeteritum (2023-05-14 00:30:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136069969.
praeteritum (2023-05-13 04:38:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136040372.
user_3022894 (2022-03-13 12:40:33+00:00): Hi, 

hier noch ein kleiner Tipp:
Das Tag "playground:theme" ("Thema") wird tatsächlich für Spielplätze so vorgeschlagen vom Editor. Wir verwenden es jedoch nur dann, wenn der Spielplatz ein spezielles, eigenes Thema hat, also z. B. ein Schiff-Spielgerüst oder so etwas. Hat der Spielplatz keine besonderen thematischen Bauten, lassen wir playground:theme einfach weg.
Viele Grüße
Lukas
bxl-forever (2022-03-08 21:14:04+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for this.  It is always useful to add one more tag here, it could be a description or the inscription on this plaque, or the name of someone remembered here.  Otherwise, it feels a bit empty. ;-)
Patr1k_P (2022-03-09 16:09:24+00:00): hradba tam uz predsa je od r. 2009 a este k tomu si to nakreslil akosi krizom krazom aj cez ulicu
Patr1k_P (2022-03-12 11:11:17+00:00): aj toto treba opravit, resp. vymazat tvoj duplikat
Pavol33 (2022-03-12 11:14:06+00:00): Mazat neviem prosim urobte to niekto
Patr1k_P (2022-03-12 11:29:50+00:00): opravim to..bud prosim opatrnejsi v niektorych upravach a radsej sa najprv poriadne pozri, ci nie je dany objekt uz v mape, pripadne ked si niesi v niecom isty, bud vytvor poznamku (na pravej strane mas moznost pridat poznamku do mapy) alebo sa spytaj na fore

https://groups.google.com/u/1/g/osm_sk
praeteritum (2023-05-12 07:00:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136004019.
Rogoyski (2023-04-07 19:12:46+00:00): Rozwaliłeś tutaj model 3D budynku przy Chmielnej 35 w Warszawie. O co chodzi i co to za zadanie map roulette?
conradoos (2023-04-07 22:12:24+00:00): A te building:part to nie były przypadkiem poza budynkiem?
conradoos (2023-04-08 05:04:21+00:00): Ale rzeczywiście nie powinienem ich usuwać tylko napisać, że są poza budynkiem. Przywróciłem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134638734
Rogoyski (2023-04-08 09:23:40+00:00): Dziękuję! Nie wiem, co masz na myśli o napisaniu, że są poza budynkiem. Czy odwołujesz się do opisu zadania w MapRoulette? Dlatego właśnie zapytałem o to zadanie, bo jestem ciekaw, jaki tam był opis.

Uważam, że te elementy powinny znajdować się w obrysie i tak kiedyś było, ale potem @syntex wymienił obrys, wstawiając geometrię sztywno wg EGiB. Przy braku sprzeciwów za parę dni to przywrócę.
conradoos (2023-04-08 11:54:16+00:00): Nie pamiętam, jaki dokładnie był opis w MapRoulette, bo robiłem kilka różnych wyzwań dotyczących budynków z różnymi opisami (a ja nie byłem autorem tych wyzwań).
user_5359 (2022-03-13 06:01:55+00:00): Hallo! Kannst Du Dir bitte nochmal http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9563485916 ansehen? Welche Bedeutung hat der Tag NW = ESE?
rupertvdk (2022-03-13 10:07:24+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, da sollte eigentlich ein direction=* Tagging hin. Hab es korrigiert.
Falsernet (2022-03-08 20:42:14+00:00): ^^^Changed track to path + service road based on access
surveyor54 (2022-03-09 15:12:38+00:00): Hi,
die Namen, die du hier bei einigen Gebäuden einträgst, sind keine Namen. So etwas gehört eher in den Tag "operator" oder "description".
Lies dir bitte den Wikibeitrag über Namen durch.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names

Gruß
surveyor54
Knightyyyy1 (2022-03-09 16:09:14+00:00): Hi!

Der Vorschlag kam von OSM. Wenn ich bei dem Telekom Gebaeude den 'name' Tag entferne wird er mir automatisch vorgeschlagen.

"Vorgeschlagene Aktualisierungen:
+ name=Deutsche Telekom AG"

Ideen?
dieterdreist (2022-03-09 21:25:59+00:00): Zu diesem Thema wird gerade auch im deutschen Forum diskutiert:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75088
BCNorwich (2022-03-10 08:00:54+00:00): Hi, I just want to point out that placing a bridge on top of a road makes for highway duplication, thus disrupting routing. There should only be one highway. What you ought to have done in this situation is make a section in the existing highway where the bridge is and then tag the bridge section appropriately. I've deleted your bridge and amended the original highway to include the bridge.

Regards Bernard.
whb (2022-03-10 11:20:06+00:00): Umbenennung "Riedstraße" in "Im Ried" nicht plausibel, deshalb rückgängig gemacht.
Bitte Quelle für diese Änderung angeben!
std_82 (2022-04-05 18:46:23+00:00): Der Pfad existiert weiterhin. Er hat keinen offiziellen Anschluss an die Fichteallee mehr, geht aber weiterhin bis zum Waldausgang.
Er wird auch noch weiterhin von Einheimischen benutzt.
philippec (2022-03-08 21:16:57+00:00): Mechelen Guldenstraat - added addr:housenumber 10 and 12
Zesde keer, goede keer.
bxl-forever (2022-03-08 21:38:35+00:00): :-)
vasony (2022-04-19 18:18:06+00:00): Szia!

Felpéc:
A Rákócziból és Dózsából is Petőfit csináltál, biztos jó így?
A Polgármesteri Hivatalnak és a 
Postának is Dózsa utcai címe van, nekem nem tűnik annak.

Tamás
hujberg (2022-04-22 18:00:50+00:00): Szia Tamás!

Kösz az észrevételt. Igazad van. Javítottam a hibát.

géza
praeteritum (2023-05-11 06:46:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135962306.
user_5359 (2022-03-09 05:25:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60645321, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60646463. What is the meaning of the foreign tags
acres=0.0
category=MAINTENANCE
facility_type=PARK
park_type=LANDSCAPING

Please notice also: We didn't use a slash to combine different values, we use the semicolon.
surface	bushes/trees
TTmechanicalupdates (2022-03-10 09:51:48+00:00): Hi! These edits were made in an automated way by a bot that was created to fix duplicated inner polygons (more information can be found in the links in the tags). In case of a duplicated way, the bot copies the existing tags of that way to the inner ring way and then removes the duplicated way. It does not make any changes in the tags–these were already present on the duplicated way.
ZLima12 (2022-03-25 04:28:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM!

I left these fixme tags here so that people could adjust the roads once new imagery is available. Why did you delete them?

Thanks,
ZLima12
Fra00 (2022-03-10 07:59:22+00:00): Ciao. Puoi per favore spiegare tutte queste modifiche con più di quattro parole? Ti ricordo che il tag "trunk" non vuol dire automaticamente "superstrada" e che, da wiki: "Le strade extraurbane ad una sola corsia per senso di marcia, che però non presentano incroci sul loro percorso e abbiano accessi ed uscite mediati da corsie di ac/de-celerazione potrebbero essere marcati da highway=trunk, per distinguerle da altre strade che potrebbero presentare incroci e rotonde." Se sono state taggate trunk per anni, un'azione unilaterale non è la soluzione migliore.
Inoltre, per quanto riguarda i link: "Gli svincoli/rampe si considerano appartendere alla strada che entrano/escono. Di norma è la strada con la classificazione più alta"(!!!)
alessandrocarmeli (2022-03-10 08:27:14+00:00): Come già spiegato svariar volte nella comunità italiana va messo dolo quando è presente un cartello, sarebbe opportuno inserire una primaria con il segnale motorroad=yes.
Fra00 (2022-03-10 08:33:28+00:00): E quale cartello dovrebbe essere presente? Quello di inizio superstrada? Allora che senso ha la frase in wiki?
Per i link procedo io alla correzione.
alessandrocarmeli (2022-03-10 08:47:27+00:00): No: il segnale motorroad è un segnale quadrato con un auto bianca su sfondo blu che si usa in questi casi su strade con nuove costruzioni che la fanno sembrare una superstrada ma non lo sono in realà
Fra00 (2022-03-10 08:50:32+00:00): Scusa, spiegati meglio. In caso ci fosse questo "segnale motorroad" (che presumo abbia un nome tecnico anche in italiano) la strada come andrebbe taggata secondo te?
Fra00 (2022-03-10 08:53:51+00:00): Quel segnale di cui parli nulla ha a che fare con le caratteristiche tecniche della strada (quindi distinzione tra trunk e primary), ma semplicemente limita l'accesso ai soli veicoli a motore. Cosa c'entra?
alessandrocarmeli (2022-03-10 08:55:49+00:00): Il segnale è http://www.mininterno.net/segnale.asp?num=228. Le superstrade si mettono solo con il segnale suo di inizio e fine, che in questo caso non ce.
Fra00 (2022-03-10 09:00:22+00:00): Dove si trova questa prescrizione, che è molto importante dato che l'utilizzo di questo segnale è molto limitato?
In caso ciò che dici fosse vero, quasi tutti i trunk italiani andrebbero riportati a primary, ma in wiki non è scritto.
Dove si è espressa la "comunità italiana" in merito a ciò?
alessandrocarmeli (2022-03-10 09:39:42+00:00): Se ben mi ricordo nel gruppo telegram italiano e/o nella mailing list
Fra00 (2022-03-10 09:43:56+00:00): Se questa regola esiste non è applicata e non è chiarita nella wiki, che dovrebbe essere un manuale generale anche per chi è fuori da tali circoli esterni.
Comunque okay, se così è non c'è altro da dire. Purtroppo tra i molti problemi che ha OSM c'è anche la chiarezza inesistente delle linee guida.
praeteritum (2023-05-10 06:23:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135920269.
wireguy (2022-03-08 22:15:11+00:00): hi McKenna, welcome to OSM!  Thanks for adding the houses.   Try and get the corners of the houses more accurate.   Then press the Q key, it will square the corners making it look much nicer.   If you have any q's, just ask.   Keep mapping!
◪ Jarv (2022-03-10 16:58:12+00:00): Hi john paul jones & gringo,
When specifying width you do not need to use "m" for metres. Standard Metric Units are presumed unless a different unit is specified. So for width/height its presumed to be metres.

Kind regards,
Thomas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118253434
⇄ john paul jones & gringo (2022-03-11 09:21:25+00:00): Okay, thank you for that. 
Should I remove the 'm' if I see it? 
The width info was already there in this case. I often see the 'm'  I adjusted the cycleway to reflect the fact that it moves from road to path or vice versa and in some cases does not exist
◪ Jarv (2022-03-11 16:37:03+00:00): Ah, I didn't look at the history for it, my bad.

Its not critical to remove the "m", data users usually have no issues if it is there.
Although if you see it on something that you are editing has the "m" on it, then I'd recommend removing it
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-08 23:12:22+00:00): All deleted!!
Please email data@openstreetmap.org
marczoutendijk (2022-03-09 02:30:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5753
ameziol (2022-03-08 21:42:26+00:00): mam wrażenie że numerki są przesunięte o jeden i dlatego taki szajs się odwala między 97, 99, 101 i 103, ale to jutro w terenie sprawdze najpierw
ameziol (2022-03-09 07:20:09+00:00): Yup, przesunięte
wireguy (2022-03-08 22:16:15+00:00): hi sunflower!, welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding the houses. Try and get the corners of the houses more accurate. Then press the Q key, it will square the corners making it look much nicer. If you have any q's, just ask. Keep mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118253864
Leo Slager (2022-03-08 23:55:04+00:00): Beste guncoen,
Het is misschien goed om je te realiseren dat alle gebouwen en adressen rechtstreeks worden geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG van het Kadaster. Als er iets niet klopt kun je bij het Kadaster een terugmelding doen:
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=88727.613586736&geometry.y=436750.60992859&zoomlevel=6
Met het blauwe potloodje links kun je een terugmelding doen zodat de fout hersteld kan worden.
Sommige gemeenten zijn daar echter zeer traag mee.
Het is dus beter om gebouwen in OSM niet te veranderen, want bij een volgende import wordt de oude situatie weer hersteld.
Leo Slager (2022-03-09 00:00:30+00:00): Het zijn dus weldegelijk drie aparte gebouwen die slechts met loopbruggen met elkaar zijn verbonden.
de tag building=residential is een niet bestaande combinatie.
Probeer je in te lezen in de wiki en zoek daar dan de key building op.
Dan lees je daar wat er wel en niet kan met de tags op een gebouw.
Leo Slager (2022-03-09 00:13:21+00:00): Het lijkt allemaal zo eenvoudig. Maar er zit een hele wereld van conventies achter:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Building:levels
ik heb nu toegevoegd:
building=yes
building:leveld=4
building:min_level=1
Gonéo (2022-05-05 15:48:15+00:00): Bonjour,

Ce groupe de modifications a entrainé le déplacement du n°13 Grande Rue de Vaise. L'immeuble traverse la rue et déborde sur les autres bâtiments. Il y avait d'ailleurs un avertissement (listé ci-dessus sur le sujet). 
Comme il y a beaucoup de changements il ne vaut mieux pas annuler ce qui a été fait. Est-ce que je te laisse corriger ou bien tu as besoin d'aide ?
fflorent (2022-05-05 15:52:07+00:00): Étant nouveau sur OSM, je veux bien de l'aide à ce sujet, car j'aurais beaucoup de mal autrement.

Merci à toi !
Gonéo (2022-05-06 14:50:22+00:00): Corrigé: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120634413
fflorent (2022-05-10 11:02:30+00:00): Merci beaucoup !
boopington (2022-03-08 22:09:04+00:00): meant buildings
skyper (2022-03-09 11:20:38+00:00): Hallo TFTD
Schön, dass Du Dich um Buslinien kümmerst.
ÖPV in OSM ist nicht so einfach und es passieren schnell Fehler. Ich rate daher auf jeden Fall die pt_assistant Erweiterung zu installieren und ein Blick auf PTNA zu werfen, Linie 1 (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-bodo-Analysis.html#bus_1-7) bzw. Linie 5 (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-bodo-Analysis.html#bus_5-5). Auch dürfen wir in BW, inklusive dem gesamten bodo die GTFS-Daten verwenden, siehe Quellen (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-bodo-Analysis.html#A2.2)

Kannst Du Dir das bitte nochmal anschauen? Brauchst Du Hilfe? Fragen beantworte ich gerne.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
Dodko (2022-12-09 17:22:38+00:00): name=39 je to naozaj názov podniku?
Kabaz (2022-12-09 18:25:57+00:00): Opravím na "Klub 39"
MxxCon (2022-03-09 02:08:01+00:00): Hello.
When mapping crosswalks, end nodes of those crosswalks are not supposed to be tagged as crosswalks too. They should be either tagged as curbs, if appropriate, or w/o any tags if you are not sure there are curbs. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118254654
Umer Randhawa (2026-05-25 22:06:39+00:00): This is Village Sardar Aurangzaib khan Rajar
eggie (2022-03-09 06:08:58+00:00): Beste guncoen,
Het ondergrondse station heb ik hersteld met building:part=yes

mvg
eggie
fabiotofy (2022-03-09 06:45:50+00:00): ciao, ho creato un tag apposito con nome "name:en" dove ho riproposto il nome inglese. Così li abbiamo entrambi
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118254892
gscholz (2022-03-11 05:51:56+00:00): Hi Mia Guspitasari,
thsi changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=106.77664&lat=-6.52743&zoom=18&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=118254948

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Gujido
gscholz (2022-03-13 06:14:17+00:00): Hi Mia Guspitasari, 
this error is still not fixed. Can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Wetterauer (2022-03-10 10:11:48+00:00): Hallo Friednauerin,
Du  schreibst: "nicht jedes Gebäude muss mit dem Namen der Schule versehen werden"
Heist umgekehrt aber, es darf jedes Gebäude den Namen tragen.
Und in wie weit die Lesbarkeit der Karte dadurch besser wird, ist ebenfalls Deine Ansicht.
Was aber überhaupt nicht geht, ist, dass Du Keys wie "Schule" oder "Sporthalle" gelöscht hast. Damit wurden auch wichtige Informationen gelöscht.
Ich bitte Dich daher Deine Änderungen wieder zurückzunehmen.
Friednauerin (2022-03-11 01:26:19+00:00): Die drei Schulen und auch alle Sporthallen sind als solche gekennzeichnet. Auch nach Löschung des Browser-Caches fällt mir da kein Mangel auf.
Croniac (2022-03-09 04:26:55+00:00): Contrary to the invalid-tag-modification flag, this property is not residential, and is absolutely a gas station and convenience store.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118255110
fabiotofy (2022-03-09 06:48:34+00:00): Ciao, Non utilizzare questo tag (name_1), etichettare un nome con un suffisso con più valori è deprecato. Utilizza il tag alt_name - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118255348
VLD075 (2022-03-09 20:08:36+00:00): Hello fabiotofy, thanks for reaching out and for the heads up on using the alt_name tag instead. The mapper has been informed and will remember to use the correct tag in the future. If you have any other questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to us!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-08 23:11:15+00:00): 118253652 118253575 118253333 118236459 118236375 118236335 118218983 118218963 118218916 118218841 118218833 by lily2014
Sockpuppet of:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5585
omarsoukane 
bob2000
jodie1974
munger2002
barry_fortnite_2002
adam2011
larry_2002
noa2003
omarsouk
larson1974
adams22052003
magic 2001
daisy_2014
lusk_2014
lily2014
drivec (2022-05-11 01:43:08+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and traces.
vojtechzaboril (2022-03-16 07:23:53+00:00): Dobrý den, proč jste upravil tuto cestu (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23000209) z motorway na trunk? Ve skutečnosti je to dálnice i v tomto úseku.