piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
geof1 (2016-07-25 19:32:30+00:00): I can remove it and all the changes that I've done with this tag, if it's necessary. Please see my response on the forum-
SomeoneElse (2016-07-25 20:29:37+00:00): I'd try just explaining what it's for first.  The forum's something of a backwater (at least the English-speaking side of it) - not many people will read what you write there.
marc__marc (2022-09-28 21:12:16+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4310051713
3 seats in a bycycle_parking ? or 3 cycles ?
Regards,
Marc
johnarupire (2022-09-30 01:37:15+00:00): 3 cycles, I don't remember...
user_5359 (2016-07-19 07:39:08+00:00): Wlcome to OSM! Did you the building http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/285900676#map=19/40.86482/-73.93180? You entry is a duplicate entry.
Athalis (2016-07-21 19:17:43+00:00): Hallo Jens,

danke für deinen ersten Beitrag. Der Tag "historic=castle" scheint jedoch nicht zu passen. Kannst du dir das mit einem anderen Editor noch mal anschauen, z.B. unter openstreetmap.org mit dem iD Editor?
Athalis (2016-08-03 08:15:58+00:00): Auch keine Reaktion auf direkte Nachfrage. Da ich von einem Bedienungsfehler des Editors ausgehe habe ich historic=castle zu office=logistics geändert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41209149
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-07-19 01:31:58+00:00): Pare de usar nomes abreviados, pare de deletar vias e pare de desenhar vias inexistentes.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-22 21:00:02+00:00): Hi.
You've changed the name to "Big Ben / Elisabeth Tower" here.  That combination isn't in use at all, but both already exist as "name" and "official_name".
I've changed it back.
Achoin (2016-07-19 07:57:21+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Вы внесли исправления в карту openstreetmap с помощью приложения MAPS.ME.
Ошибка: 
1. Вы добавили POI "Магазин электроники". Не думаю, что магазин может находиться внутри гидроэлектростанции. Удалил.
2. Вы добавили POI "Автобусная остановка" На здание службы транспорта. Исправил на "офис". Название оставил прежнее.
Спасибо за участие.
chillly (2016-07-25 17:46:06+00:00): Hi,

Have you missed a tag from the way into the churchyard?
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-07-25 19:26:34+00:00): oops, looks like I have! Now fixed, thanks for spotting this.
(or it could be Potlatch not recording all my changes in a changeset again)
Dino Michelini (2016-09-19 13:14:34+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che a due sentieri hai dato come nome "bad way!" ma non è il nome caso mai si tratta dello stato...
Dino Michelini (2017-05-25 07:32:07+00:00): Hello, please correct the name of the path; Bad way! Is the state of the path not the name. Read the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility
goodidea (2017-05-25 10:43:24+00:00): Hello! Thank you. I know the wiki. I found it so important to mark this way also with a name (and added also sac_scale and trail_visibility) to make it visible as really bad and dangerous although it doesn't correspond to the principle "never tag for the renderer". I know... 

But when I was there, this way was tagged as a normal path and I took it therefore and was really very much in trouble after that (even with good equipement). So it was perhaps a very personal decision. 
So if you think, the rules should be followed in any case, don't hesitate to change it!

Note: I used LocusMap on that trip, which is a quite good app, but trail visibility is not rendered there as far as I know (or not very good).
dgitto (2017-05-26 12:39:27+00:00): Yes the rule should be followed. The name is the name only.
chillly (2016-07-25 17:51:09+00:00): I think the multipolygon might need more tags. If you can have two outers (not sure you can) then both of the school areas need to be tagged as outers. Would a site relation be better than a multipolygon?
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-07-25 19:38:01+00:00): I'm no expert, the OSM wiki says a multipolygon can have "Two disjunct outer rings" and says on the relations:site (proposal) page that for schools with multiple sites to use a multipolygon relation.

I have now tagged the ways as outers now, which I had failed to do on this changeset. Hopefully this will fix it - unless you have a better way to fix this (I didn't want to have the schools joined together across the road as this would give the wrong impression that the road would be going though a school campus rather than being a public road going between two school campuses)
Thanks
SomeoneElse (2016-07-25 20:25:26+00:00): You'll want amenity=school on the school relation presumably?  Unless I've completely misunderstood what's happening here...
Yorvik Prestigitator (2016-07-26 00:13:06+00:00): You're right, I can't work out why it was not there. I have added it now, thanks.
ff5722 (2016-12-01 11:46:52+00:00): Je hebt de tunnel=yes tags weggehaald, zou je dit zelf weer kunnen herstellen?
Aggregaat02 (2016-12-01 14:56:19+00:00): Zal ik meteen doen :)
naoliv (2016-07-30 18:59:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 41130767 where the changeset comment is: Reverting undiscussed and wrong mass edit
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2021-06-22 09:05:34+00:00): oi erickdeoliveiraleal, posso deixar assim https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334232301 com 2 nomes diferentes? o primeiro com o nome original da rodovia, o segundo com um nome que se refere ao segmento da estrutura que é uma ponte?
Obrigado companheiro
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-07-19 01:43:41+00:00): Pare de deletar vias que outras pessoas desenharam, elas estão certas.
Supaplex (2016-07-29 15:25:57+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
chihchun (2016-11-20 08:09:40+00:00): 地圖是共用的，請不要隨意註解。相關說明請登錄到 description 標籤。
mavl (2016-07-19 16:44:58+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы сдвинули много объектов. Перед тем как их сдвигать, вы выравнивали спутниковый снимок по трекам?
mavl (2016-07-19 16:47:41+00:00): На углу Широтной и Малой Боровской нет торгового центра. Он ещё только строится и будет построен в следующем году.
mavl (2016-07-19 16:59:51+00:00): Здание по адресу Широтная 193 вы зачем-то удлинили на 21 метр. Оно правильно было обозначено. Здания нужно обрисовывать по крыше и выравнивать их по фундаменту.  
  
В этом пакете правок много ошибок и я его полностью отменил. Пожалуйста, начните с небольших изменений. Ознакомьтесь с документацией http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия
va-deam (2016-07-24 14:39:03+00:00): Стоматология уже год назад переехала!
Chetan_Gowda (2016-09-02 05:45:21+00:00): Hey @TriziaM I appreciate your valuable work on OSM. Here in this changeset, you've created many many duplicate buildings. Can you take a look at this and try to clean them out. If you want help from me, reply to this comment. 

Best,
Chetan
user_5359 (2016-07-19 18:27:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please check the right position of you node. I can’t find a street nearby with your street Co Rd K.

If you don’t change the position, I will delete the entry.
user_5359 (2016-07-30 18:44:25+00:00): Okay, no responce: I have delete the node
user_5359 (2016-07-19 15:39:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I think your node is on the wrong place! Did you see the building http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298509600 ? Please move your node to right place or I must remove this spam!
user_5359 (2016-07-30 18:45:50+00:00): Okay no responce, I have delete the entry!
maraf24 (2016-07-20 20:38:52+00:00): Skąd taki adres? W tym miejscu jest Obrońców Warszawy 9.
manoharuss (2016-07-19 06:35:48+00:00): This was a test to see if iD editor gives warnings on overlapping buildings. Going to revert it, now.
user_870861 (2016-08-04 05:48:17+00:00): j'ai corrigé des ways en doublons exactement dupliqués (géométrie et tags) issus du changeset:40807984 ou changeset:40849516  
il reste ces 2 vays qui sont superposés mais n'ont pas les meme tags 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431821856
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431585717
Kiekin (2016-10-05 08:37:42+00:00): Erschließungswege highway=service immer mit dem Zusatz service=*  kartieren, da sie sonst von Navigationsgeräten nicht als befahrbare Straße erkannt werden.
bastibay (2016-10-05 08:56:28+00:00): Das sind ja auch nur Zufahrten zu Garagen. Diese sollen ja auch nicht von einem Navi als befahrbar erkannt werden.
Kengaru (2017-02-24 12:33:03+00:00): адрес дома не верно обозначен addr:housenumber 	44 (А,Б,В,Г,Д)
letihu (2016-08-06 20:28:29+00:00): Hier sind ca. 430 nodes übereinander, ohne dass sie verbunden sind, entstanden.
letihu (2016-08-06 20:32:04+00:00): Hier z. B.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/163658634/history
sind es schon 16 fehlende Verbindungen.
BeKri (2016-08-06 22:01:10+00:00): Dann hoffe ich, dass ich alle erwischt habe
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-26 02:01:42+00:00): I modified some highways based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-26 02:01:43+00:00): I modified some highways based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Tomas Straupis (2016-07-19 09:13:06+00:00): Change reverted. Please consult Open Street Map rules before doing changes.
Hjart (2016-07-19 20:15:45+00:00): This is a duplicate. Removed.
ForstEK (2017-07-05 08:40:13+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Исправил данные в Вашей правке - номер дома перенёс в специальное поле addr:housenumber, оно не пишется в поле name, это поле только для имён собственных (ЖК Цивилизация)
fserges (2017-07-05 19:26:48+00:00): Не очень понял комментарий и правку. Ни один из домов ЖК "Цивилизация" не сдан (http://www.lsr.ru/real-estate/residential-real-estate/progress/121773/?ELEMENT_ID=116807#.WV088VFpyHs), поэтому addr:housenumber не уместен - у домов пока нет адресов. Дом 1 - Дом 10 это не номера домов как адрес а название домов как названия домов в рекламном буклете, т.е. name. Названия домов/корпусов вводятся для того чтобы люди могли ориентироваться где какой дом до тех пор пока адрес не присвоен.

Когда какие-то дома будут сданы, им будет присвоены официальные адреса, тогда и addr:housenumber нужно будет заполнить.
ForstEK (2017-07-05 19:37:49+00:00): Суть правки была в том, что в ключ "name", где был указан номер дома, не вносят такую информацию, её надо вносить в поле "descriprion" или "note". Это всё правила: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
fserges (2017-07-06 05:06:49+00:00): Такая практика принята в Петербурге. Застройщики выводят в продажу огромные комплексы, части которых имеют названия (в рекламных материалах, документах) - Корпус "А", Дом 1, Секция 1, Корпус "Бриз", "Башня А" и т.п. Так они именуются на форумах, сайтах и т.п. Это ничем не противоречит тегу name. Можете пройтись по всем новостройкам СПб и ЛО - такая практика устоялась за много лет. Это помогает ориентироваться покупателям и посетителям на карте в районах массовой типовой застройки, как, например, здесь - http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/59.85949/30.41465.
utack (2016-07-19 23:59:35+00:00): Danke fürs Ändern  
Gut dass die Erklärung einleuchtend war
Supaplex (2016-07-29 14:28:58+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Nakaner (2017-05-23 20:37:44+00:00): Hallo Miple,

im Rahmen dieses Änderungssatzes hast du den Namen der "Blinde Gasse" in "Blindegasse" geändert. Auf Basis welcher Quelle hast du die Änderung vorgenommen?

Ich möchte dich um eine zeitnahe Antwort bitten.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Commodoortje (2016-08-30 17:00:13+00:00): Routering loopt fout, door: 
area=yes 
highway=service
Mogelijke oplossing:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area:highway
Deze methode laat de routering wel goed werken. 
PS. Waarom is geen amenity=parking op deze contour geplaatst 
Daarentegen op diverse andere posities.
Zie ook topic in het forum:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606573#p606573
eggie (2017-06-28 15:36:37+00:00): Met tussenpozen weer aan het mappen.. Wellicht wel handig om alsnog een welkomstmail zoals wij die nu sturen met nuttige links te ontvangen.
afkab (2016-10-29 23:48:27+00:00): you seem to have deleted Queen Elisabeth National Park in Uganda. That is a very real National Park. The Queen actually visited it in 1953. Could you restore it please?
mapwitch (2016-11-15 10:09:58+00:00): Oops, I'm sorry, this must be happened by mistake. I've recreated the relation now.
literan (2016-07-19 12:20:26+00:00): зачем дубль создавать?
woodpeck (2016-07-24 14:59:51+00:00): This appears to be an undiscussed and faulty import of data that's more than 10 years old, with partially overlapping polygons. Can you explain?
Reino Baptista (2016-07-24 17:37:32+00:00): Dear Woodpeck,

The data edited on this changeset (and comment as source:CLC) is from the well known "Corine Land Cover 2006"  data set and was inputted accordingly with the osm recommendations on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Corine_Land_Cover.

In what concerns the data age please notice that I did use "Version 17 (12/2013) - Corine land cover 2006 is the year 2006 update of the first CLC database which was finalised in the early 1990s as part of the European Commission programme to COoRdinate INformation on the Environment (Corine) as described on http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/clc-2006-vector-data-version-3.

The overlapping polygons are a misshape. I'm trying to load, roughly, one Portuguese county each time. In this case Aljezur.

Concomitantly, of course, I also tryed to harmonize new data with previous existing polygons. 

I will gladly revise it.

RB
woodpeck (2016-07-25 13:03:44+00:00): RB, the wiki page you cite is not a carte-blanche for undiscussed CLC imports. You are expected to discuss your import on the imports mailing list nonetheless. Many people are of the opinion that CLC data is too old to be valuable. You appear to have deleted a large amount of data, partly forest polygons that were drawn from aerial imagery and much more current and detailed compared to what you have imported, for example see this area:http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/deletion.png. Deleting and replacing data is NOT the right approach to "harmonize new data with previous existing polygons" - you are destroying careful and valuable work that people have invested and replacing it with older, less accurate data. Please stop this import immediately and repair the damage that you have done.
Reino Baptista (2016-07-25 16:03:16+00:00): Dear Woodpeck,
Thank you for your opinion. 
As I previously stated I did not erase any data. 
I added, joined and updated.
After you kind contact I did start revising the CLC data I added, coincidentally, around the coordinates depicted on "deletion.png".
RB
woodpeck (2016-07-25 23:35:15+00:00): Dear RB, I am slightly concerned by your choice of words: "Thank you for your opinion". I might not have made myself clear enough. When I asked you to stop importing data, that was not an opinion, but a request of the OSMF Data Working Group that you would ignore at your own peril. I think the question of whether you deleted any data is not an "opinion" either; look at the list below this comment and you will see that this changeset alone has deleted 1 relation, 33 ways, and over 3500 nodes. Also a before-after comparison like I did in my image shows that detail was lost in the process.
Reino Baptista (2016-07-26 00:16:24+00:00): Dear Woodpeck,

Please don't be alarm.
I used the word "opinion" just referring when you said: "Many people are of the opinion that CLC data is too old to be valuable" Finding this data was my motivation to do the work I did, since it dates from 12/2013. Now I know there are more opinions different from mine and certainly more correct. It was not, and is not, my intention to work outside the regulated parameters that come from OSMF Data Working Group and there personnel, which includes instructions/requests to stop importing more data. I never said that I would not accept what you are saying or ignore what you requested. Please don't make broad conclusions just because I used the word 'opinion'. My only concern now is to improve from my previous insertion of CLC. Has I told you before I already started to "harmonize new data with previous existing polygons" or as you put  it "repair the damage that you have done". As I can't go back in time I started meticulously repairing, with the best of my knowledge, the all area, analyzing with same priority all the existent polygons. I'm willing to learn and I can not accept that I wont be able to do a better job and improve that part of the OSM map.
RB
ethylisocyanat (2017-06-05 12:23:40+00:00): @woodpeck: What's the outcome of discussion? IMHO you should revert.
bkil (2016-11-19 14:55:45+00:00): Hi. I'm delighted to see that you are also using the lunch tag. I have extended the wiki page. Would you be interested in giving some feedback on the discussion page?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lunch
user_5359 (2016-07-19 15:01:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you add turning circle on a street crossing?
NoelB (2017-03-05 23:05:03+00:00): what does "No. 65 on list" mean?
Dafo43 (2017-03-05 23:25:00+00:00): The link I had seems to be gone now but basically there were 81 signal towers erected in the early 1800s. They were broken into 2 sections, Dublin to Cork Harbour and Cork Harbour to Donegal. Some background info here - http://photopol.com/dca4/archirl_towers.pdf
Владимир К (2016-07-21 08:37:36+00:00): убрал ссылки на букинг и убрал новый свет. то ли дубль, то ли черт его знает. Будьте внимательнее
Ninelly O (2016-07-21 12:27:48+00:00): Добрый день! прошу прощения, я была уверена что те места что я добавляю на карту - персонализированные и видны только мне. 
Хотела бы уточнить, можно ли создавать персонализированные метки с информацией, видной только мне?
Владимир К (2016-07-22 07:59:09+00:00): Конечно, можно. Нажмите на звездочку и всё. А вы можете подробно описать, как вы добавили эти метки и почему думали, что это ваши личные заметки?
pangoSE (2018-09-16 19:17:27+00:00): Hej.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431865563 verkar fel. Hittat via OSM insp.
user_5359 (2016-07-19 14:53:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have add the key tourism=hotel to describe your business.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-22 19:43:37+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Please don't add test data to OpenStreetMap, even to the middle of the Atlantic.  If you want to upload to a test server, you can use http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap!
Пожалуйста, не добавляйте тестовые данные OpenStreetMap, даже до середины Атлантики. Если вы хотите загрузить на тестовом сервере, вы можете использовать http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/
Adrien Desprez (2016-07-19 18:34:57+00:00): Errata, I was talking about Bata, not Beta (too used to this word ;) )
user_5359 (2016-07-19 14:46:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
Hjart (2016-07-19 15:10:15+00:00): Jeg har lige fixet broen så den virker med routing
kayle (2016-07-20 05:40:35+00:00): Zdravím, čo je to za POI ten "Magic"?
marian63 (2016-07-20 06:52:21+00:00): sorry,to je firma a zle som to priradil - budova
anyrain (2016-07-20 13:15:02+00:00): не смещено было. подложка была выравнена по трекам. :-)
Harald Hartmann (2016-07-20 14:45:13+00:00): Nur zur Info und unabhängig von der Diskussion im Forum: du kannst auch gleich einen Verweis auf wikipedia taggen ;)
Nakaner (2016-09-26 20:51:10+00:00): Hallo tklug,

ich bin gerade dabei, den Import von Fahrtreppendaten von Benutzer sawalter zurückzusetzen (Quellenangaben nicht nachvollziehbar, Qualität schlecht, Editierfehler usw.).

Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz am westlichen Zugang zum S-Bahnsteig die steinerne Treppe ergänzt, nachdem sawalter bei seinem  Import die Treppe in eine Fahrtreppe umgewandelt hatte.

Warst du oder ein Kollege vor Ort gewesen und kannst mir sagen, ob die Fahrtreppe nach oben oder unten fährt?

Im Voraus vielen Dank für deine Antwort.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner (2016-09-26 20:53:24+00:00): Nachtrag: Die conveying-Angaben (Fahrtrichtung), die sawalter ergänzt hat, stehen halt oft zu dem im Widerspruch, was andere Mapper vor ihm vor Ort erhoben haben.
Euskirchener (2016-07-19 13:39:43+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Dein erster Beitrag ist leider nicht ganz fehlerfrei! 1. Du hast dem neu erstellten Fußweg eine Adresse gegeben (Straße, Stadt, Hausnummer, Postleitzahl). Das ist natürlich Quatsch, denn in der Realität haben Wege auch keine Adressen. Das Gebäude, zu dem der Weg führt, hat schon eine Adresse. Deshalb solltest du alle Adressen-Einträge vom Weg wieder entfernen. 2. Der Weg ist nicht mit dem Rest der Karte verbunden. Du hast also den Weg mittenrein gezeichnet, aber es gibt keine Anbindung an den Kaiser-Karl-Ring oder an das Gebäude. Somit können Routenplaner nicht über diesen Weg routen. Du solltest also ebenfalls den Weg mit der Straße und dem Gebäude verbinden. Wenn dort an der Stelle im Gebäude ein Eingang ist, kommt an diesen Punkt "entrance=*". Falls du nicht weißt, wie man das (korrekt) macht, kann ich das auch übernehmen. Bevor du weiter Änderungen an OpenStreetMap vornimmst, empfehle ich auf jeden Fall, sich etwas mehr damit auseinanderzusetzen. Ein schönes Anfänger-Tutorial gibt es hier (http://learnosm.org/de/beginner/). Bitte melde dich hier in der Diskussion zurück!

Gruß, CorrectMapper
gnorkx (2016-07-19 13:59:48+00:00): Danke Für die Hinweise. Ich denke so ist es nun korrekt.
Viele Grüße
Euskirchener (2016-07-19 14:17:49+00:00): Ja, wunderbar, Danke. So sollte es sein. Nur mir ist gerade ein Fehler aufgefallen, den ich selber begangen habe. Ich hatte dir geschrieben, für den Eingang "entrance=*" zu vergeben. Das hast du falsch verstanden, denn ich habe mich unklar ausgedrückt. Der erste Teil "entrance" ist korrekt. Mit dem zweiten Teil, dem Sternchen, sollte nur ausgedrückt werden, dass hier ein Wert hin soll, den ich nicht weiß (ich wohne nicht hier). Guck mal auf dieser Seite nach (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:entrance). Was passt am Besten? Ist das eher ein Haupteingang ("entrance=main") oder was anderes? Da du wahrscheinlich vor Ort warst, kannst du das am besten sagen. Ersetze dann einfach das Sternchen durch die richtige Bezeichnung. Und was auch noch schön wäre: wer darf den Weg/Eingang benutzen? Mithilfe des "access=private" oder "access=service" etc. legst du das fest. Kannst du dann auch noch ergänzen. Steht ja alles auf der verlinkten Wikiseite.
gnorkx (2016-07-19 14:49:03+00:00): Ah, ok. Änder ich sofort. Hatte das * als "allgemeiner Eingang" verstanden ;)
Euskirchener (2016-07-19 15:16:39+00:00): Wunderbar, so kann’s bleiben. Damit wäre das erledigt.
GinaroZ (2016-08-26 14:16:00+00:00): Hi, I noticed you added a duplicate of Latchmere Road, which wasn't connected to anything in a few places. Do you remember why that was?
LeighG (2016-08-30 20:53:24+00:00): Hi there. That may have been an error on my part. I've just started using OSM. It looked like routes weren't joined up out of Ham Gate to Latchmere Lane.
MKnight (2016-08-01 13:21:46+00:00): was muss man sich hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1154336394 unter "Mo off" vorstellen?
MKnight (2016-08-01 13:24:06+00:00): Das selbe Problem bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/333329669
MKnight (2016-08-01 13:26:38+00:00): Ok auf der Webseite von Backwerk steht Di-Do, wäre entsprechend opening_hours Tu-Th statt Mo-Fr.

Zumindest da ist es nicht falsch, aber irreführend.
Korrigierst Du das?
muralito (2016-07-19 20:33:30+00:00): Hola Pablo.

¿Como encuadra un admin_level 8 con is_in:city distinto de el mismo?
¿El is_in:city no tiene que ser cosas mas "chicas"?
muralito (2016-07-19 20:33:59+00:00): Sobre lo de Ing. White me refiero.
pablopareja (2016-07-19 21:24:04+00:00): Efectivamente.

Gracias, ya corregí el error. Cualquier otro problema que detectes por favor avisame.

Saludos!