piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2016-06-24 20:57:26+00:00): Nie ma potrzeby dodawania adresów do budynku, bo adresu juz tutaj są - jako samodzielne punkty.
Radek Seweryn (2016-07-07 11:29:55+00:00): Ok... Mogę się zgodzić z tym stwierdzeniem pod warunkiem uzasadnienia obecności pól, które wystęują w warstwie budynków, a które to pola umożliwiają wprowadzenie informacji adresowych.
Jeżeli możesz mi zatem wyjaśnić czemu kasujesz wprowadzone przeze mnie informacje, które wprowadziłem raczej zgodnie ze wskazaniami struktury bazy - będę naprawdę wdzięczny.
Wiadomym jest, że powielanie informacji w bazie nie stanowi praktyki dobrej, pochwalanej i wartej naśladowania. Jednak - twórcy tej bazy przewidzieli takie pola. Zatem je uzupełniłem. 
Chyba, że zapisy regulaminu określają inny sposób wprowadzania/ uzupełniania danych. Z tego co widzę, budynki posiadają uzupełnione informacje adresowe, zatem wyjątku tutaj moją edycją nie wygenerowałem.
Radek Seweryn (2016-07-07 11:32:29+00:00): Punkty adresowe pochodzące prawdopodobnie z rejestru Ewidencji Miejscowości Ulic i Adresów są, ok. Ale czy założenia gromadzenia danych akurat w przypadku OSM zabraniają mi umieszczenia informacji adresowej także w atrybutach danego budynku?
Radek Seweryn (2016-07-07 11:33:16+00:00): Jeżeli wiesz coś więcej na ten temat - proszę o wskazówkę.
maraf24 (2016-07-07 11:45:08+00:00): Jak napisałem - nie ma potrzeby. Nie oznacza, to, że nie wolno. Należy wówczas przenieść wszystkie tagi z węzła na budynek i usunać węzeł.
Tutaj miał miejsce szereg błędów:
1. nie przeniosłeś wszystkich informacji
2. dodany adres był błędny, niezgodny z obowiązującym w polskim OSM formatem
3. zostawiłeś stary adres - stworzyłeś duplikat
4. utworzyłeś zbędny multipolygon z budynkiem
To wszystko poprawiłem.

Możesz poćwiczyć przenoszenie adresów na budynek - nie ręcznie, ale przy użyciu funkcji scalania (ikona z plusem) w edytorze webowym. Należy w tym celu zaznaczyć (z shiftem) obrys budynku i adres.

Na koniec: nie sugeruj się edytorem. To jedno z wielu narzędzi związanych z OSM, ale nie będących OSM, z wieloma błędami. M.in. nie pozwala on łatwo edytowoać adresów w miejscowości bez nazw ulic. 
Tutaj jest opis, jak to powinno wyglądać: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Tomas Straupis (2016-06-24 11:40:30+00:00): Pakeitimas pašalintas. Nereikia visko iš eilės žymėti kaip tourism=attraction.
trial (2018-02-21 20:55:15+00:00): je suppose qu'un oneway=yes aurait ça place sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/426980659#map=19/43.58277/3.86247. À mettre dans le bon sens ;-)
Mobilités Montpellier Méditerranée Métropole (2018-02-22 08:29:53+00:00): du point de vue réglementaire, ce n'est pas un sens unique même si physiquement ça l'est. En cohérence avec les autres voies taggées dans la clinique, je l'ai passé en sens unique.
Merci pour ce retour.
trial (2018-02-22 21:57:07+00:00): Il va falloir se cotiser pour que la polyclinique se paye un panneau sens interdit car sinon une personne ayant raté l'entrée peut entrer par la sortie et être bloquée par la barrière !
freeExec (2016-06-24 11:44:23+00:00): Остановочный павильон - не здание. На худой конец amenity=shelter + shelter_type=public_transport
Владимир К (2017-01-24 07:51:27+00:00): Что за кодировки вы добавляете в name? это ненужно и будет снесено
Artek007 (2017-01-24 08:02:34+00:00): [P] - означает парковку;
_free - означает то, что эта парковка бесплатная;
McDonalds - означает принадлежность данной парковки к близлежащему McDonalds-у, для удобства и ускорения идентификации объекта
wambacher (2016-06-25 08:33:30+00:00): Hi, euer erster edit lag total daneben und musste stark überarbeitet werden. siehe http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=597941#p597941 und die nachfolgenden Einträge.
maraf24 (2016-06-24 20:01:44+00:00): Zwykle nazwy sklepów i innych punktów zaczynamy wielką literą. Czy te tutaj to wyjątki?
Euskirchener (2016-06-24 12:42:10+00:00): Hallo und Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Ich habe ein paar Fragen zu deinen Änderungen: 1. Heißt die Straße/der Weg wirklich so (Straßenschild vor Ort?), denn die amtlichen Katasterkarten kennen nur den Namen, der da vorher stand, „Forsthaus Steinbach“. 2. Du hast "access=private" eingetragen. Gilt das für alles oder nur für z. B. Autos? Was ist mit Fußgängern? Dürfen die dort lang, denn der Weg geht ja weiter, aus dem Wald raus auf die Weide, wo er dann auf einen anderen Weg trifft. Darf man da überall nicht langgehen? 3. Du hast "tracktype=grade2" gelöscht. Wieso? Es sollte schon ein Wert eingetragen sein. Hier (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype) kannst du mal nachschauen, welcher Wert am ehesten zutrift. Bitte melde dich hier über die Diskussion zurück.
Viele Grüße, 
CorrectMapper
superrick (2016-06-24 14:25:14+00:00): Hallo, habe nochmal nachgebessert, war noch nicht Fertig.
Euskirchener (2016-06-24 14:30:05+00:00): Ah ok, sehr gut. Haben die Gebäude hier eigentlich Hausnummern? Ich trage immer Adressen mithilfe der amtlichen Karten ein, nur hier gibt es keine und beim Forsthaus steht 0. Sehr komisch, aber vielleicht weißt du es besser weil du vor Ort bist?
superrick (2016-06-24 14:31:46+00:00): Nein hier gibt es  keine Hausnummer
NZGraham (2016-07-14 02:27:26+00:00): Hi, I've done a small tidy up for you. Good spotting with the one-way access to/from Riverlea Road at Cambridge Road. Your edit did however make Riverlea Road one-way all the way between Cambridge Road & Hudson Street. I've now split the way to correct it. Message me if you want any more info. Graham
maraf24 (2016-06-24 20:00:19+00:00): Nie "sklep ŻABKA", ale "Żabka".
Supaplex (2016-06-27 10:54:11+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
LLlypuk82 (2016-06-25 18:46:59+00:00): Судя по названию, это точно не мелкий продуктовый магазин. Что продаётся? Если товары для садоводов/огородников, то это shop=garden_centre
sautchenkov (2016-06-26 09:52:41+00:00): Да там продается садовая техника. Осваиваюсь с типами спасибо за поправку.
Hjart (2016-06-24 21:15:22+00:00): Flyvepladsens navn mm var i forvejen angivet på den omgivende polygon. Da det er bedst kun at have info et sted har jeg slettet det punkt du har lavet her (og på flere andre flyvepladser også).
En søgning på danske flyvepladser og lufthavne angivet i OSM kan ses på http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/gY7
Harald Hartmann (2017-02-26 08:11:45+00:00): Hi carlitos gomez, this changeset looks like an import (14782x man_made=water_well). Where was this import discussed and documented? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines)
The problem i see is the possible incorrect tagging: you used name instead of ref, and tagged both amenity=water_well AND man_made=water_well.
So please give us some more informations.
Regards, Harald Hartmann
edvac (2017-02-26 19:42:55+00:00): This import has been reported to the imports list. It will likely be reverted, or redacted in case there is a copyright infringement.
edvac (2017-03-03 01:10:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted, in two changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46536080
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46536388
Please, follow the imports guidelines (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) for any import.
carlitos gomez (2017-03-03 14:02:31+00:00): Hi Harald

Surely this is an error on my part. I didn't realize because the points
were well displayed  on OSM
This data have been shared by CDIG (Centre de Documentation et
d'Information Geographique du Tchad) in early 2016.
In theory these public data and shareable on OSM (I'm in the process of
requesting confirmation from my contacts in Chad)
carlitos gomez (2017-03-03 14:05:05+00:00): Hi Edvac
Sorry for my late reply, I was on  field mission
This data have been shared by CDIG (Centre de Documentation et d'Information Géographique du Tchad) in early 2016. In theory these  data is public (I'm in the process of requesting confirmation from my contacts in Chad)
Harald Hartmann (2017-03-03 14:18:37+00:00): The problem is, that public data isn't public data. In Germany we have also public OpenData, but: The "attribution" obliges the data user to name the respective data provider. This doesn't match the OpenStreetMap License Policy, and therefore this (OpenData) isn't useable in OpenStreetMap :-(
andrewwiseman (2017-03-03 16:01:43+00:00): But if he gets confirmation from the data provider then it will be fine, correct?
Harald Hartmann (2017-03-03 16:08:18+00:00): If he pays attention to the import guidelines,
and documents it in the wiki (for transparacy, legal and license issues),
and corrects the import,
and so on, yes, then everything will be fine.
Harald Hartmann (2017-03-03 16:09:09+00:00): sorry, i've forgotten the link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Step_3_-_License_approval
edvac (2017-03-03 20:04:42+00:00): Imports have to be discussed with the local OSM community too, and then with the imports list.
I would also discourage automatic imports. Better do it manually, crowdsourced, adding contextual data to each object (having a WASH point in the middle of nowhere, without the road access to it, is a really weird thing and not good mapping at all)
Some examples of crowdsourced manual imports with contextual data:
* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_Nigeria_eHealth_Borno_Health_Facilities_Workflow
* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_CAR_UNICEF_workflow
carlitos gomez (2017-03-06 15:20:52+00:00): Hi all
All data from the ResEau project (SIRE) under the DDC-Tchad-UNOSAT contract
are public and shareable data, confirmed !
carlitos gomez (2017-03-06 15:41:33+00:00): Hi edvac
Add data manually: ok for digitization some infrastructures but I do not think that is  a good idea if there are 500, 1000 or 2000 points to add.
Freaky, some members of the OSM community met for me (mostly humanitarian staff) just encourages the opposite.
"having a WASH point in the middle of nowhere, without the road access to it, is a really weird thing and not good mapping at all" : Having an access road that goes to middle of nowhere is not very pretty either !. For me the two ways of mapping are appropriates. Some water points,localities or other minor infrastructures are not easyly visible in satellite image. Add a point  can facilitate the  digitalisation of others infrastructures. 
In addition, some information collected for the humanitarian community is quite recent so not visible on the BING image
SomeoneElse (2017-03-07 23:35:18+00:00): Hello carlitos gomez,
Just to echo what has been said above - if you want to import data please do read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and follow the links from it.
If you've got any questions you can either mail the Data Working group at data@osmfoundation.org or ask on the "imports" list at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/imports/ - people will be able to answer any questions there.
They'll also be able to give advice on whether "Forage SARC229" is sensible as a name, and will probably ask what a tag such as "ID_Ouvr" means.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
evo_evz (2017-11-03 12:39:28+00:00): Hi Andrew, I'm new to editing but I wanted to delete this small part of Willarong Rd between the two Kingsways you seem to have created. The reason is because you cannot drive straight through Willarong Rd from North to South. Or would it be better to leave this small part of Willarong Rd there and set up a only turn restrictions instead (i.e a left turn only traveling south from Willarong onto Kingsway)? Both would have the same effect but wanted to run it past you first. What would be the best way to do this? You seem to know a lot about this stuff. Many thanks. You seem like a really interesting and knowledgeable guy. Evan
aharvey (2017-11-03 21:39:28+00:00): If you check the history of the way you're talking about at https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/151022092 you can see it was actually created by inas. No worries though.

Looking at the imagery, it doesn't look like there is a physical barrier and as you point out you can still make left and right turns from the Kingsway so you can't delete it otherwise routers wouldn't be able to direct people to make those right turns off the Kingsway.

What you suggest with adding the only_left_turn restrictions on Willarong Rd the way to go. Ideally you'd only add this tag where there is a sign or road marking indicating you can only make a left turn from Willarong.

PS. I also noticed that short segment https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/151022092 has oneway=yes, which means you can't turn right from Kingsway heading northbound, but looks like from the imagery that you can, so you might want to remove the oneway=yes tag.
evo_evz (2017-11-03 22:52:55+00:00): Thanks Andrew. I'm making some changes and had a few questions. First can you tell me how I modify a changeset comment? I made an error in the comment only and wanted to fix that first. It's changeset 53491460. Supposed to say, Left turn only, not Right turn only. Thanks.
aharvey (2017-11-03 23:03:58+00:00): You can't modify a changeset comment after you've saved it, but you can add a changeset comment like we are doing here. The changeset comment is helpful for others to understand what and why you changed something.
richlv (2016-06-25 20:54:24+00:00): cuisine=russian is a bit suspect for a restaurant called "Piebalga" - are you sure that is accurate ?
dieterdreist (2016-06-24 12:35:05+00:00): I agree for the attraction (although it seems that we might miss something there, as there is no attraction currently at this spot), but the B&B has good tags, including complete addressing and a name, so you should undelete it I believe. These are the tags: addr:housenumber 	20
addr:street 	Via dell'Amba Aradam
internet_access 	wlan
name 	Laterano guest house
opening_hours 	24/7
tourism 	guest_house
dieterdreist (2016-06-24 12:39:48+00:00): sorry, you are right for the attraction, that's a duplicate of the garden of oranges, likely (didn't check the russian text, but the location is it)
Constable (2016-06-27 10:44:38+00:00): would you stop adding chinese names translation to Italian names as Bocca della Verità?
You're supposed to improve the map not to damage it.
If you know the chinese translation of a name you should add the "name:zh" tag and leave the "name" tag untouched.
If mapsme doesn't allow to add the name:zh tag, please consider to stop using that bullshit app as a OSM editor
Asteliks (2023-02-22 11:54:55+00:00): Hej, w nawiązaniu do notki z: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4262655339

Mamy 2 opcje na oznaczenia tablic odjazdów według wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:departures_board
i
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:passenger_information_display
sq7obj (2016-07-23 22:57:34+00:00): Hej, do oznaczania serwisów rowerowych używamy shop=bicycle z odpowiednimi tagami, bicycle_repair_station to stacje do samodzielnej naprawy rowerów - w Łodzi są takie dwie AFAIR, przy Manufakturze i w Porcie Łódź.
Владимир К (2016-07-04 12:19:23+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1965664#map=18/55.78019/37.40772 мультиполигон не замкнут
Владимир К (2016-07-04 12:26:21+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1308835#map=18/55.79073/37.41393&layers=D еще один
cadsauxk (2016-08-29 00:48:28+00:00): Oi Vitor

"Estrada Pólo Turístico Inhotim" de onde você tirou isto?

abraço
Vítor Dias (2016-08-29 02:25:35+00:00): Olá Gerald! Tirei de uma lei municipal. Tem o link dela na wiki de rodovias estaduais. Abraços!
cadsauxk (2016-08-29 03:44:27+00:00): Rapaz, eu já devo ter passado nesta estrada uma dúzia de vezes e nunca vi isto. Por isto estranhei. Agora, você não acha que compensaria registrar isto no campo "source"? Procurei na wiki mas não encontrei nada sobre isto, não sei se procurei certo.

abraço
Vítor Dias (2016-08-29 14:07:44+00:00): Gerald, de fato eu esqueci de colocar o link para a lei nomeando essa estrada (LMG-813) em particular - ela era municipal e me parece que só a posteriori foi estadualizada, possivelmente para ser pavimentada. A lei é essa aqui: http://www.cmbrumadinho.mg.gov.br/portal/component/jdownloads/finish/429-2010/1231-lei-ordinaria-n-1-830-2010.html?Itemid=0
danidoedel (2016-06-24 14:12:09+00:00): Bitte achte auf Rechtwinkligkeit deiner eingezeichneten Gebäude. Offensichtlich rechtwinklige Gebäude sind von dir nicht als solche eingezeichnet. In iD geht das glaube ich mit der Taste "S". 
Das ist nicht böse gemeint, sondern vielmehr als eine Hilfe ;)
Viel Spaß weiterhin beim Mappen!
edvac (2020-02-18 11:04:54+00:00): Hi:
Can you explain:
1) If you have permission from the CDIG to import these data into OSM?
2) If you have followed the import guidelines? That means:
a) Contact the local osm community of Tchad
b) Wrote an import wiki
c) Discussed this with the imports list
Moreover, "Lieu" isn't a documented key. We don't usually start any key with a capital letter, and language is UK English for mostly all keys, by agreement of the OSM community.
muralito (2016-08-03 02:10:50+00:00): Hola Antonio. ¿Carga de vehiculos electricos fue lo que quisiste mapear?
dixilick (2016-06-25 01:54:53+00:00): Suggest that this access to allotments be changed to alley as vehicles use this to access rear of houses
Alecs01 (2016-06-27 18:56:12+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai mappato tutta l'area della stazione di Porta Genova come "brownfield", ma la stazione è ancora aperta per ora o sbaglio?
lordfine (2016-06-24 14:20:46+00:00): #googleldnsw Added roads, need to tag them.
LLlypuk82 (2016-06-25 18:51:53+00:00): sidwalk — тротуар, дорожка вдоль проезжей части, а здесь её нет.
Много полезной информации можно посмотреть на странице [«Объекты карты»](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82%D1%8B_%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%82%D1%8B#.D0.9F.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.B3.D1.80.D0.B0.D0.B4.D1.8B_.28barrier.3D.2A.29)
Commodoortje (2016-06-24 20:45:57+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  diverse aanpassingen/verbeteringen verricht. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
literan (2016-06-25 12:06:45+00:00): Если дорожки ликвидировали - можно убрать. Главное - вы забыли тег landuse=construction вместо leisure=park поставить. Я поправил
mosstreet (2016-06-25 19:17:24+00:00): Дорожек нет, с точки зрения глухого забора и прекращения доступа на территорию. В последующем их точно уже не будет. Название все же не правильное. Это Дримворкс и прошу все же вернуть мое обозначение
literan (2016-06-26 11:05:43+00:00): DreamWorks же это название компании, по чьей франшизе открывается парк http://moslenta.ru/article/2015/11/30/parknagatinodetsky/  https://lenta.ru/news/2016/03/18/disneyland/ - впрочем, если у вас есть пруфы, давайте посмотрим. А насчет дорожек - они удаляются только если их нет физически. Если просто закрыл доступ для посторонних, то на них следует поставить тег access=private
JohnnyGPS (2016-06-24 14:51:03+00:00): Oh, and I should add that the geometry is from Bing imagery.
StephaneP (2016-11-08 13:46:59+00:00): Bonjour,

Pourquoi as-tu changé la classification de cette route, et supprimé la séparation en 2 à la jonction avec la D763 ?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=40263946
StephaneP (2016-11-08 14:25:37+00:00): Pardon, le passage en tertiary est correct pour cette partie, c'est pour le reste, qui part en direction de la chapelle heulin, depuis l'audigère, où c'est plus contestable.
naoliv (2016-07-17 01:56:31+00:00): Márcio, nesse caminho https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30600382 você acabou criando um "destination_1" para indicar um segundo destino.
A chave "destination" suporta vários destinos, bastando apenas separá-los com ponto-e-vírgula.
Por exemplo, nesse caso ficaria destination=Macaé;Campos
Thundercel (2016-07-17 02:53:31+00:00): Não havia reparado nesse detalhe
tanks
msevilla00 (2016-06-24 18:09:17+00:00): Hola, la actualización que has hecho sobre los datos del mapa de OpenStreetMap (que son los que usa Maps.me) noes correcta. Has sustituido el nombre de este lugar de "El Chorro" por "El Chorro El Chorro 29552"
--
Hello, I guess your correction of the name of the village is not apropiate. You change from "El Chorro" to "El Chorro El Chorro 29552". Take care of the update you do through Maps.Me movile App. These changes go to the OpenStreetMap map.
Viajero Perdido (2016-06-24 17:09:41+00:00): I meant east.

BTW, I won't try to keep track of, or map, cutblocks.  They come and go.
LLlypuk82 (2016-06-25 19:06:28+00:00): чей банкомат? и пора узнать, что в нашей стране есть только Беларусбанк (без мягкого знака)
sautchenkov (2016-06-26 09:49:21+00:00): Чей банкомат не помнил, добавил пока без оператора. На днях посмотрю пофикшу.  Про Беларусбанк спасибо.
Alecs01 (2016-06-25 15:01:46+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! please note the supermarket was already on the map and named "Conad", you created two more identical nodes
user_5359 (2016-06-25 05:47:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is your hotel a different hotel as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262100975 ? If not please merge the information.

If you need help: You are welcome.
Ewen Hill (2016-06-25 02:35:51+00:00): Thanks for doing that.
Hjart (2016-06-24 22:32:57+00:00): Når du bruger iD angives source automatisk (se imagery_used ovenfor)
Viajero Perdido (2016-06-24 17:00:06+00:00): See XML within the ZIP (Shapefile) for simple as-is disclaimer; no restrictions on use.
cronoser (2016-06-24 22:15:45+00:00): Hola, veo que estás añadiendo picos en la Bureba. Antes de subir una edición pon una descripción breve de lo que has cambiado para que el resto de los usuarios sepamos que tocamos cada uno.
Te escribo para comunicarte que estás duplicando algunas cumbres, como el monte Cuchillos (encima de Oña), por eso te recomiendo que uses el programa JOSM (josm.openstreetmap.de) en lugar de Potlach ya que es mucho mejor y puedes ver lo que está añadido. Por favor contrasta antes de subir.
Si tienes cualquier duda, estaré encantado de ayudarte con ellas al igual que mi compañero walo.
Un saludo
Óscar
Viajero Perdido (2016-06-24 17:24:20+00:00): See XML within the ZIP (Shapefile) for simple as-is disclaimer; no restrictions on use.

If this goes well (no howls of outrage, etc.), I'll do Kananaskis and PLPP next.
user_5359 (2016-06-25 05:49:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I delete your test entry.
muralito (2016-06-25 03:06:38+00:00): Hola Pedro.
¿Que quisiste mapear?
user_5359 (2016-06-25 05:56:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
user_5359 (2016-06-25 06:00:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Your street has no connection to any other street, the highway class (secondary) ist to big, the name School Route is more a description as a name.

Sorry, but I have delete your entry. If you need help: You are welcome.
Mateusz Konieczny (2016-07-02 02:25:15+00:00): see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/612275#map=15/33.4610/-112.1651&layers=N
TheDutchMan13 (2016-07-02 04:37:24+00:00): Thanks for adding this!
user_5359 (2016-06-25 05:18:20+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Eine Schutzhütte innerhalb eines Gebäudes? Was wolltest Du uns eigentlich damit sagen?
R0bst3r (2016-06-26 11:23:17+00:00): Weiterer Maps.me user mit sinnlosen edit. Am besten wieder entfernen. Die edits sind leider qualitativ nicht so dolle.
SomeoneElse (2016-06-27 13:23:33+00:00): Hi,
Is the full name of the viewpoint here "The Dome - Victoria square shopping center" or is it just "The Dome"?
Leo Slager (2023-07-31 10:18:42+00:00): Dag Andre,
shop=auto is een niet bestaande tag.
shop=car is dan de juiste Engelse term voor een autobedrijf.
ik pas het even aan.
pyram (2016-10-02 19:39:19+00:00): Norisring war schon vorhanden: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1889538

Solche nicht-physikalischen Strecken werden hier als "Relation" erfasst.

=> gelöscht.