piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
cMartin (2015-05-19 15:17:56+00:00): Als ich mit indoor-mapping begonnen habe, existierten mehrere verschiedene Taggings. Ich habe damals das für mich am besten dokumentierte genommen, und da stand building:level für das Stockwerk. Mittlerweile ist "level=*" etabliert. Bei einigen Punkten habe ich beide Schreibweisen verwendet. Heutzutage versuche ich nur noch "level" zu verwenden. Das heißt aber, dass es überall noch Altlasten gibt.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-05 07:54:43+00:00): Can you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1258528 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-05 07:59:14+00:00): And http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1258539 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-05 08:03:00+00:00): And http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1258542 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-05 08:03:52+00:00): There are other suspiciously named villages, I will not spam notes for all of them.
pbnoxious (2021-01-31 16:08:35+00:00): Hallo, was ist das denn für eine Wanderroute die du hier eingetragen hast? Habe weder vor Ort Markierungen gesehen, noch sie auf anderen Karten gefunden.
milet (2021-02-03 09:36:47+00:00): Der User hat nur diese eine Bearbeitung gemacht, und seitdem nie wieder etwas. Vermutlich wird da keine Rückmeldung mehr kommen... Ich denke, wenn du vor Ort keine Hinweise auf die Route finden konntest, ist es vollkommen in Ordnung sie zu entfernen.
mueschel (2025-01-08 18:59:49+00:00): Die Tags an diesem Gebäude existieren seit einer Ewigkeit, aber viele davon sind ausschließlich hier in Verwendung. Sind diese Daten noch aktuell, oder gibt es eine Möglichkeit das auf "normale" Tags umzustellen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267201439/history
flohoff (2025-01-09 08:05:57+00:00): Das ist unsinn. Da hat jemand vor Jahren sowas man überall an so Gebäuden in GT gepackt. AUch an den Kitas - das macht null sinn.

Ich räume da mal auf. 

Danke für den Hint. Hatte das gar nicht gesehen.

Flo
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-23 15:29:12+00:00): What do
CONSOMMATI=40
PERSONNE/P=9
Mean?  Where could I find a key that gives meaning to that data collected?
zwaygp (2017-11-28 18:16:54+00:00): Buildings, boundaries, and parking lots should not be connected to roads. Please fix.
bigbug21 (2015-08-19 08:34:48+00:00): Es gab ein Feedback zu den Geschwindigkeiten der Strecke auf "Drehscheibe online": http://www.drehscheibe-online.de/foren/read.php?3,7516273
neuhausr (2015-01-06 17:07:41+00:00): these parking areas don't make a lot of sense. try tracing them more accurately as they actually are, including tracing around buildings. tagging capacity is a nice touch, though!
Josef73 (2018-11-09 19:27:35+00:00): Hello, what are the business hours of the cafe?
GerdP (2015-11-09 06:54:14+00:00): Please review:
The tag highway=unclassified_link was rarely used is not documented, so I've changed it to unclassified to make sure that routing software will not ignore it:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16160502
Josef73 (2019-01-01 14:36:51+00:00): Hello, when is the chemist open?

 https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/139994
d1g (2015-12-08 19:01:59+00:00): как может быть admin_level=0?
Kelerei (2017-08-30 20:48:10+00:00): Best changeset ever.
eggie (2018-07-08 20:18:54+00:00): Na 4 j weer aan het mappen.. daarom alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
segi (2022-05-24 13:42:01+00:00): Ahoj,
neviem či si to budeš pamätať ale pred 8mimi rokmi si označil územie Červená Hora ako rezervácia.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234829376
Vieš si spomenúť na základe čoho? nikde som nenašiel zmienku o tom že by sa jednalo o rezerváciu.
MarkusHD (2015-11-18 22:58:53+00:00): Es dürfen keine Informationen aus Google Maps übernommen werden wie hier wohl in der Brückenstraße 49/51/52 geschehen. Bitte vollständig rückgängig machen, auch bei eventuellen weiteren betroffenen Objekten oder Änderungssätzen.
MarkusHD (2016-03-24 19:01:20+00:00): Ich sehe, du mappst wieder, also gibt es dich noch. Was ist jetzt mit meinem Verdacht?
M!dgard (2019-05-26 16:16:19+00:00): Hi opani, what does ET (HSN) stand for, maybe hoogspanningsnet.com? The license on their grid map is not compatible with the ODbL. Additionally they source from other maps not acceptable for OSM. The only relevant change I see is the addition of some pylon references, these are easy enough to remove.
opani (2019-05-31 01:57:31+00:00): ET refers to a member of the hoogspanningnet forum who in a forum thread provided me with the info of some new developments in the grid in that area. It is a long time ago so I don't quite know exactly what it was. It is not data taken from their map.
M!dgard (2019-05-31 17:14:54+00:00): Okay, thank you!
PasqualeD (2022-09-10 18:35:18+00:00): Ciao cancello il Tag perché non c'è nessuna "località non popolata"
Borneo (2022-09-23 19:30:20+00:00): ma il toponimo esiste, andrebbe modificata la tipologia, non cancellato il toponimo
Borneo (2022-09-23 19:34:23+00:00): https://www.borneo.name/cartografia/gsgs/4229/189-3-altamura
qui lo trovi segnato
PasqualeD (2022-09-23 19:48:11+00:00): Ok va bene se per te non è un problema lo puoi aggiungere tu? Grazie
Borneo (2022-09-23 20:40:12+00:00): ok
pfiers (2021-01-04 22:37:01+00:00): Excuses voor het commenten op een 7 jaar oude changeset, maar ik had een vraag over de "Vriendschapsboom" in het stadspark (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2730787551).

Is dit de vorige plek van de Vriendschapsboom zoals besproken in:
http://leveninleuven.be/onderwerpen/jaartallen/page/10/
(onder "Weetjes :")
of:
https://immaterieelerfgoed.be/files/attachments/.421/Mannenvanhetjaar.pdf
(op de kaart)?
Nils (2017-11-15 21:10:23+00:00): Ich bezweifele, dass die Umbenennung der Bahnhofstraße im Bereich Einmündung Thomas-Mann-Straße bis zu dem Knick südlich auf Höhe des Bahnhofsgebäudes in Duderstätder Straße zutreffend ist. Die in OSM vorhandenen Hausnummern und die Tags der dort liegenden Gebäude sprechen dagegen.
Nakaner (2014-11-23 13:05:39+00:00): Die Bahnstrecke Schwäbisch Hall-Hessental–Öhringen-Cappel ist nicht elektrifiziert, steht so bestimmt auch in der Wikipedia.
Nakaner (2014-11-23 13:08:39+00:00): partially reverted by changeset /26972661 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26972661)
Jojo4u (2015-01-23 23:47:19+00:00): Was soll denn das Gruhe sein? Mit nur name= hat es leider keine Funktion in der Karte, ich habe es gelöscht.
Herrieman (2021-06-06 22:13:33+00:00): Dit gebouw, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268043505, klopt niet helemaal. Aan de zuidoostkant wordt bestaat het 'uitstekende' deel niet. Ik heb dat gecorrigeerd, maar wilde het even melden. Ik weet niet of dat ook nog teruggemeld moet worden naar de BAG o.i.d.? Ik heb daar verder niet zoveel kennis van.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 05:37:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268045914/history has waterway = brook that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by waterway=brook? Is not using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream intentional and wanted here? How waterway=brook differs from waterway=stream in this case?
MarkusHD (2016-08-20 16:29:09+00:00): Habe gesehen, dass der Straßenname "Am Bolenzer Graben" nicht mehr stimmt, als ich heute dort unterwegs war. Hab es gerade wieder zurück korrigiert. Bitte keine korrekten Namen mit falschen aus LGL ersetzen.
Jojo4u (2015-07-26 18:35:49+00:00): Hallo navigate, was ist mit dem access=permissive an der Dinkelstr. tatsächlich gemeint? Vielleicht ein note=* weil permissive oft missbraucht wird. Bitte auch hier kommentieren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/403498
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-31 20:09:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2735305507 - "inaugurated on Flanders' day of litter removal, we're slowly drowning in our own waste" - is it maybe an inscription?
Polyglot (2018-05-31 20:18:01+00:00): 4 years ago, it looked like this: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.82360833333334&lng=4.66332&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=LmXnC9ARzs9ykQ8lV_ndEg

This is the inscription, although I don't know if that is still present: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.823478333333334&lng=4.663318333333334&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=nro9qDlpDhRnvPj9lnvigQ
Polyglot (2018-05-31 20:19:29+00:00): The text in description was a 'transcription' of the idea he communicated to me that's behind the work. Probably my own interpretation. You can remove it, if you like.
alphensebezorger (2017-07-30 17:00:09+00:00): Hallo Jan Westerhof,

In deze changeset verwijder je de tag "name=Voetpad" van een pad. Zo'n naam lijkt natuurlijk een beschrijving van het pad, en dus een gevalletje "Don't use name tag to describe things".
Maar... hier zijn de BAG-adressen echt "Voetpad 6" enz. De straatnaam van dit fietspad(?) is dus echt "Voetpad".
Mag die naam weer teurg op het pad, of heb je daar bezwaar tegen?

Vriendelijke groet, Alphensebezorger.

P.S. Een recente changeset hier trok mijn aandacht (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50691120).
Jan Westerhof (2017-07-31 06:50:17+00:00): Hoi,
Inderdaad, je hebt gelijk. Het heet idd Voetpad.

Over die andere changeset: het is idd vreemd dat huizen alleen per fietspad bereikbaar zijn. Ik ken de details van de verkeersborden ter plaatse niet. Het kan soms zo zijn dat huizen niet goed bereikbaar lijken op de kaart. Of misschien ontbreekt een onderbord over 'uitzondering voor bestemmingsverkeer'. Misschien helpt informeren bij de gemeente?
GerdP (2015-10-26 19:49:01+00:00): please review way 268273937:
it was tagged highway=show_ring 
Was is meant here?
urbanrambler1 (2015-10-27 07:51:37+00:00): This is a purpose-built enclosure around which horses are led so that they may be viewed by potential buyers or similar interested parties. It's the same as the structure found on race-courses, but this one is in a private setting and apparently unconnected directly with any race. At a race-course it might be know as an 'enclosure', but show-ring seems to be more descriptive of its purpose across various settings.
GerdP (2015-10-27 07:58:15+00:00): thanks for the explanation. I think it is better to use a common tag like highway=path
for that in combination with access=*, e.g.
access=no,horse=private
and a note that explans the details.
Is that okay for you?
urbanrambler1 (2015-10-27 09:25:52+00:00): Don't waste my time with automated and irrelevant queries.
SomeoneElse (2015-10-30 07:50:20+00:00): @urbanrambler1 OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project - we have to work together to try and create the best map.  It's far better that someone asks about a tag value that they don't understand than they just change it to something that doesn't represent what's on the ground.  If the current tagging of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268273937/history (as a highway=path) is wrong, say so.
marc__marc (2020-11-14 22:57:55+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2737375271
what's the meaning of esr:user ?
Regards,
Marc
SomeoneElse (2022-02-11 23:52:28+00:00): Hello Secumax,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 8 years ago. On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1487136624/history . We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
SomeoneElse (2022-02-11 23:53:13+00:00): Salut Secumax,

Sper că nu vă deranjează că vă întreb despre o editare de acum 8 ani. La acest set de modificări ați adăugat o etichetă „source=Google” pe nodul https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1487136624/history . De fapt, nu o putem folosi ca sursă în OSM, deoarece licența Google nu permite să fie folosită aici - ar cauza probleme reale pentru proiect dacă s-ar descoperi că folosim Google Maps ca sursă.
Dacă acesta este undeva cu care sunteți familiarizat, atunci „source=local_knowledge” ar fi perfect OK.

Toate cele bune
Andy Townsend, în numele grupului de lucru al datelor OSM
redd (2026-01-31 14:00:33+00:00): Hi miscosm,

eine Frage zu dem Waldweg, bei dem du name="Dachswaldweg" gesetzt hast (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22734760).

Weißt du, ob dieser irgendwo so beschildert ist?

Aus westlicher Richtung von der Straße "Dachswaldweg" habe nur die Beschilderung der Straße aber nicht des Waldweges gefunden.

Danke im voraus und freundliche Grüße,

Redd
miscosm (2026-01-31 21:11:40+00:00): uff, nach 12 Jahren schwer zu sagen. Evtl. hab ich das damals aus Maps4BW übernommen, das wir ja nicht mehr haben.
Auf https://maps.stuttgart.de/stadtplan/ ist der Name auch drin (ja, ich weiß wir dürfen das nicht nutzen, nur als Hinweis, dass es in Maps4BW vermutlich auch so drin Stand).
redd (2026-02-01 07:57:46+00:00): Ok. Danke für die schnelle Antwort! (Auf das 12 Jahre alte Changeset)

Theorie: Vielleicht ist der "Dachswaldweg" ein historischer Name und die Wohnststraßen wurden dann zusätzlich danach benannt.
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-11-27 11:14:49+00:00): see http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/475001
OSM_RogerWilco (2019-07-17 15:06:57+00:00): Hallo Heideammer,
den Weg quer durch die Dorfmarker Grundschule https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268435244 scheint mir nicht richtig.
Kann der gelöscht werden?
Gruß Roger Wilco
Heideammer (2019-07-17 15:12:37+00:00): Ja, es scheint als hätte ich das versehentlich was gestreckt/eingezeichnet. Kann weg, danke!
OSM_RogerWilco (2019-07-17 15:16:16+00:00): Alles klar. Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Ist erledigt.
marc__marc (2020-02-02 21:39:18+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2414003520
can you draw the extend of it ?
I suppose it include all those pitch
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667396622
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667396624
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667396623
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667396625
but I have no idea if the whole grass area is a camping or not.
Regards,
Marc
SLU_GIS (2016-01-11 16:58:04+00:00): Parking Lots
marc__marc (2021-04-03 10:38:55+00:00): c'est quoi l'espace Paul Roussel ?
Bernard59118 (2021-04-03 15:32:10+00:00): https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=espace+roussel+bondues
marc__marc (2021-04-03 15:48:54+00:00): Merci pour votre retour mais je ne sais pas trop de ce que je vois en comprendre :
les 2 lieux sont distant de plus d'un km
les 2 lieux n'ont pas le même nom
les 2 ne décrivent pas le même type d'objet
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?search=building%3Dyes :)
Bernard59118 (2021-04-03 16:00:43+00:00): désolé, je ne me souviens plus.gardez l'école de musique et supprimez l'autre
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 13:20:43+00:00): Hello!

I know that it is an ancient edit, but maybe you are still mapping in this area...

What you mapped as shop=internet in this edit ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)

It is about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2739231978/history
Nakaner (2015-05-20 16:26:36+00:00): Das war keine gute Idee. Eine Gleis darf nicht mit usage=* und service=* gleichzeitig getaggt sein (ausgenommen Industrie-/Werks-/Grubenbahnen mit usage=industrial und Militärbahnen usage=military). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging
Nakaner (2015-05-20 16:28:41+00:00): Tipp zum Bahmapping: Mittlerweile gibt es eigene JOSM-Validationsregeln fürs Bahnmapping. http://www.openrailwaymap.org/validator/openrailwaymap.validator.mapcss
HolgerJeromin (2015-05-21 09:29:04+00:00): Ok gerne. Dann sollte man aus dieser Relation alle services nehmen und dort das usage wieder rausnehmen. Machst du das?
user_6110846 (2017-10-13 09:55:00+00:00): на каком основании  украинский релейшн Крыма был перереведен на русскій язык. На русском должэен быть только русскій релейшн . Такак гос языком в Россіі есть русскій язык. Украінскій релейшн (отдельный от русского ) должен быть на украіском языке так он показывает позіцію Крыма со стороны Украіны.
user_599436 (2015-09-09 04:04:24+00:00): Hi! The Bowl Natural Area is tagged as natural=land, a deprecated feature. Is there a more accurate tag that could instead be used to describe that feature? Maybe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area
skyper (2015-01-16 00:15:58+00:00): Hey jf_simon

Bist Du Dir sicher, dass addr:city=Lörch hier für die Rheinstraße richtig ist ?

Ist das nicht Sexau ? und Lörch nur der Gemeindteil (suburb) oder etwa gleich Vordersexau.
jf_simon (2015-01-16 08:01:01+00:00): Hi Skyper, 
hast recht, mein Fehler, sorry.
Habs grad korrigiert.

Gruß Simon
skyper (2015-01-16 13:03:16+00:00): Das scheint hier ein generelles Problem zu sein. Siehe "Im Grün" bzw "Buchholzer Weg". Die Postleitzahl bezieht sich auf Sexau und somit auch addr:city. Wie dann die weiterer Unterteilung aussieht, weiß ich leider nicht.
SomeoneElse (2022-01-23 23:28:35+00:00): Hi Dudley,
I know it was 8 years ago, but just on the off change, any idea what "stile=g" might be on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2164688539 might be?
Cheers,
Andy
dudone (2022-01-24 19:43:01+00:00): Hi Andy

Many thanks for spotting this.

Fortunately I have some geotagged images so I have managed to update this.   I assume it hasn't changed since 2014! There are two gates that relate to the track.  One small another larger one.  The smaller one is that one that is in general use.  I don't have a picture but but I'm fairly sure there is a third gate for the "path" as this is on a higher level with a retaining wall on the image I have.  I tend to map gates as lines now so I have changed these, removed the section of all and added a bit more detail.  

Dudley
SomeoneElse (2022-01-24 19:50:13+00:00): Thanks - re the gates as lines, any suggestion about how to render them better than https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#zoom=21&lat=53.2683976&lon=-1.6100976 would be gratefully received!
dudone (2022-01-26 20:47:52+00:00): Not an easy one.  My suggestion would be a line for the gate with a circle at each end for the posts.  It would however depend on how, walls, fences and hedges are rendered, although I guess you could use distinct colour.  I guess the other issue is, can you have a way with a circle at each end with the software you are using?  I don't think this is possible with a garmin map but my skills with this are quite limited.
Dudley
awesm (2016-02-27 03:35:25+00:00): Is that really a prison on Stanmore Rd? Its name sounds more like the operator, too.

(refer http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/519614)
aharvey (2018-04-29 06:03:16+00:00): Based on the LPI Suburb boundaries, Strahfield South High School appears to be in the suburb "Strathfield", you entered this school as being in "Strathfield South", are you sure about that?
Stimpson J Cat (2018-05-11 03:52:57+00:00): no not sure. probably just did it based on the name. you can't refute the LPI though...
aharvey (2018-05-11 04:18:58+00:00): Thanks, I've updated this now.
oini (2016-01-06 09:22:38+00:00): Hi! It would be great if you could please confirm whether the tag 'motor_vehicle=no' is correctly added to this road. Thanks
abbafei (2014-12-10 08:44:45+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I think there may be a problem with some of the changes you made in this changeset in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in the USA.. On Shady Avenue (267178665 and 54286661) you changed "5 short tons" to "5 t". However, the two are not equivalent; "5 t" is 5,000 kilograms (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tonne), but "5 short tons" is 10,000 pounds. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ton#Units_of_mass.2Fweight)

Therefore, per (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxweight#Imperial_unit_conversion), "<number> short tons" is not valid, however, "5 t" is not a correct conversion :-)

So the short tons have to be converted to tons, since they are not equivalent.

(It is true that 5 short tons is 4.535 metric tons, and therefore "5 short tons" rounds to "5 t"; however, this is a big (~250 kg) difference.)
abbafei (2014-12-10 08:50:32+00:00): Forget the above message, just found this :-)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21527289

Thanks!
Nakaner (2015-04-15 11:50:23+00:00): In Ostdeutschland gibt es keine Hp-Lichtsignale. Die einzigen Lichtsignale mit Hauptsignalfunktion in Ostdeutschland sind Hl- und Ks-Signale. Bitte beachten!
tdctdctdc (2017-09-09 18:10:15+00:00): Hi Mr_Israel,
Can you clarify what is the writing "Ad Nishmar" in the middle of Yavneel that you added here (Way: 268940818 etc)? Is it a real physical feature?
geri-oc (2018-05-30 15:29:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1402068#map=16/54.1229/12.0596&layers=N

Kannst du bitte einmal nachschauen - Gruß Gerd
BeKri (2016-02-04 17:39:49+00:00): Servus Baßtölpel,
an dem node 833404249, v3 bist Du der letzte "Verschieber" und da hängt eine Note dran. Kansch Du mal drübergucke ;-)
Gruss derBeKri
skquinn (2021-12-06 06:25:25+00:00): Hi,

Please do not change road names to full addresses. This is incorrect data and leads to incorrect labeling on the map as well as confusing data from navigation software. Thanks!
awesm (2016-02-28 02:13:02+00:00): Why did you map the small Sumner shopping precinct as a building? What was your source? Did you look at any imagery?

And please please use descriptive comments for your changesets.
user_599436 (2015-07-02 17:22:06+00:00): Did you mean to mark US 4 as a oneway road? I've removed the oneway tag for now. Please correct if I am mistaken.
scribecoater (2015-07-02 18:19:30+00:00): No, if I did that it was in error. Thanks for catching that.
user_599436 (2015-07-02 20:41:37+00:00): I figured as much. Thanks for the reply.
SomeoneElse (2020-03-28 10:50:06+00:00): Hello wvdp,
I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap over 6(!) years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2142261809 http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=2142261809 had a "source=Google" tag on it from the initial version. Maybe that came from somewhere else - perhaps you copied tags from another object? We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.  Incidentally, I notice that this changeset has a "source=wikipedia" tag on it.  Strictly speaking, wikipedia can't be used as a source for OSM either, because their licence isn't compatible with ours - but I'm currently asking about Google-sourced stuff.
If not, and there are more of these, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
wvdp (2020-04-05 18:32:37+00:00): Hello,

Even after some research i don't know where the google tag came from. but i don't think i ever copied google maps.

as for the wiki tag on the changeset. I think i add it as a source for the wiki tag. as in the wiki plugin for josm says this city is around here and the i match it by name.

I know that copying Google or any other closed source is a big no no. And i am aware that there is a big gray area around wikipedia. 

but I hope that the way I used wikipedia here is a valid use case.

With kind regards,

wvdp
SomeoneElse (2020-04-07 12:29:35+00:00): Thanks.  I've removed source=Google from that node since even if it came from Google originally, I believe that the subsequent edits to the city confirm its existence via other sources.
tuxayo (2018-06-26 10:40:59+00:00): Hi! :) there was a mistake the on following ways. level was used instead of admin_level.


https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56129243/history
joost schouppe (2018-06-26 14:06:22+00:00): Sorry! Thanks for the fix.
aceman444 (2015-06-03 22:12:50+00:00): Dobry den, co by malo znamenat "entrance=yes" na celej budove? Tu v Tlmacoch je to skoro na kazdej.
Durko_freemap (2015-06-04 05:49:45+00:00): Zdravim aceman, v zaciatkoch mi bola predstavena tato stranka http://wiki.freemap.sk/cislabudov (priklad dole), neskor som ten tag pouzival inak, ak to viete vymazat komplexne, tak nemam nic proti tomu, Durko
aceman444 (2015-06-04 19:50:07+00:00): Dakujem, opravil som.