piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-05-17 12:00:25+00:00): Milo. gewoon noteren wat je precies doet. 
Hier dus "voetpad teogevoegd en water=pond"
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48753644
MiloWernars (2017-05-18 11:15:26+00:00): Zal ik doen
mavl (2017-05-17 16:09:34+00:00): Здравствуйте. Обозначать детскую школу искусств как обычную (общеобразовательную) школу неправильно.
literan (2017-05-18 09:35:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. В вашей правке огромное количество ошибок (проставляете кривые адреса, ставите адреса на детские площадки и остановки, ставите тег входа в метро на остановку и мн. мн. др.). На этот раз я исправил, потратив полчаса времени, но в следующий раз, увы, придется откатить. И вообще - не надо ставить адреса на POI (тем более кривые и не соответствующие зданиям), это не нужно. Программы берут их из контуров домов.
literan (2017-05-18 09:39:50+00:00): ко всему еще и понаставили точек магазинов прямо на дороге, продублировали давно существующую заправку...
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
literan (2017-05-17 11:06:11+00:00): не надо писать капслоком
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:56:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-05-23 04:08:09+00:00): Better use clear changeset comments when doing your edits as part of the LGU-led mapping. A better comment here is "Batangas City LGU/CDPO mapping: add elementary school in barangay San Pedro"
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:57:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
PT-53 (2017-05-17 19:40:41+00:00): Hallo BrightBay,
Du hast an diesem Feldweg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34107755#map=18/48.29964/9.76265) bicycle=yes und foot=yes ergänzt. Das ist unnötig, da dies bei einem Feldweg - ohne aussdrückliche Nutzungsbeschränkungen durch Verkehrszeichen -  als Standart gilt.
Welcher Highway-Typ mit welchen standartmäßigen Nutzungsberechtigungen bzw. -Beschränkungen verbunden ist, kannst Du hier sehen:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#German 
Nur davon abweichende Nutzungsberechtigungen bzw. -Beschränkungen sollten eingetragen werden.
Grüße
literan (2017-05-17 10:33:12+00:00): не совсем понял, зачем вы создали отношение https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7253210 из одной-единственной линии outer...
MosKartograf (2017-06-10 09:14:00+00:00): Кое-где по границам  тротуары， части зданий и заборы, поэтому отношение явно будет разбито на линии при уточнении.
MiroJanosik (2017-05-19 05:13:13+00:00): "Vinárstvo Ján & René Pretzelmayer" by malo mat shop=wine ak predavaju vino ; a male travniky by mali byt skor (landuse=village_green + landcover=grass) ako leisure=park, podla mna.
Zaijo (2017-05-19 06:49:21+00:00): Oo. Super ďakujem. Je fakt, že som taký rýchlopečený "mapár". Ďakujem. S Pretzelmayerom je ten problém, že je to viac výroba ako predaj, tak to neviem ako zaznačiť. Tie trávniky poopravujem teda.
MiroJanosik (2017-05-19 06:56:14+00:00): Aha, v tom pripade som nasiel ze existuje taketo oznacenie pre vyrobnu vina: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:craft%3Dwinery
mar3k (2017-05-17 08:58:36+00:00): Panowie, ulica racławicka między budynkiem 47 a 49f są dwa budynki (a pokazany jest jeden) + droga jest szutrowa utwardzona i również nazwana jest racławicką - proszę o poprawki.
SomeoneElse (2017-05-22 19:47:20+00:00): (re previous comment about mechanical edit of landuse=farm) http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2818914916/history is one in an area that I do know, and I certainly wouldn't describe it as a "place=farm".  The last time I was there was a while ago, but I suspect it's still operational and should really be mapped as "landuse=farmyard".
Mechanically editing landuse=farm to place=farm doesn't fix any problems; it just moves them from one bucket labelled "things that need mapping properly" to a different one labelled "other things that need mapping properly".
Perhaps the next time you're driving up the A1 you could take a detour through cabbage country and see which farms are still operational (i.e. aren't just residential now) and map the farmyards properly :)
SomeoneElse (2017-05-22 19:52:08+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2699887733 is another one - it's a bit longer ago that I was there, but I don't remember anywhere that I'd describe as "place=farm" SE of Witham.
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-22 22:03:13+00:00): You see me quite baffled to learn that place=farm does not describe a farm. It seemed quite plain to me so far. I certainly did not do a mechanical edit, I only assumed this to be the proper tagging for remote farms. As this seems to be not the case, maybe we should consider a revert while I’m looking up if highway=motorway is in fact meant for former carriageways turned into car parks instead of actual motorways. Unfortunately, landuse=* on a single node is not valid code, so it means nothing, in a strict way of speaking. Personally, I’m not sure yet I can afford a journey up the A1 this year :( though I’d really like to.
SK53 (2017-05-24 12:45:20+00:00): place=farm is generally not regarded as a valid/useful tag in the UK. Standard practice is to map actual farms with landuse=farmyard and ones which are now residential (lots) with landuse=residential. Sometimes place=locality may also be used if widely used (remote highland areas). In most of lowland Britain farms locations are a result of enclosure and so are recent & not representatives of historically used placenames. The exceptions are mainly the (highly inaccurate) work of one mapper who has been asked to desist but does not respond to messages. I'm sure this has been discussed on talk-gb several times in the past.
SomeoneElse (2017-05-30 23:26:47+00:00): Re "place=farm does not describe a farm" - presumably it's a farm (based on the previous landuse=farm tagging); the thing that's in doubt is whether it's any sort of "place" or not.  Of the couple of dozen farms nearest to me the only one that I can think of that might deserve the tag is "Owlcotes" http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372460251 (though I actually went with landuse=farmyard there on balance).  Most farmyards really aren't places at all, any more than any other industrial companies or warehouses are.  That's not to say that in wilder places elsewhere place=farm might make sense, but as SK53 says in the UK in OSM it means mostly that someone has copied a name from an OS Streetview map with no local knowledge or survey.  For example, I very much doubt that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2661890946/history#map=15/53.1960/-0.4214 is called "Poultry Farm" - it may be _a_ poultry farm but that is probably not its name.  Also many former rural farmyards (near me I'd guess 40%) aren't really farmyards any more, but are now just residential, but you mostly need to visit to see for sure.
Best Regards,
Andy
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-31 09:22:15+00:00): Given my edit was that wrong, it would be easy to retrieve all node["place"="farm"](user:"kreuzschnabel")(newer:"2017-05-14T00:00:00Z") from overpass-turbo and retag them to landuse=farm. That should install the previous state, as if I’d never touched them. The polygons edited by me should be fine since I didn’t tag them as places.
SomeoneElse (2017-05-31 10:29:17+00:00): An Overpass query would grab all the pre-existing place=farm as well, of which there were quite a few in Lincolnshire, which this changeset covers.
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-31 11:03:34+00:00): It wouldn’t grab them unless they were wrongly double-tagged both landuse=farm and place=farm previously. My changesets definitively did not touch anything else than landuse=farm, so nodes tagged place=farm only would not be affected.
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-31 11:09:55+00:00): My proposed query would affect 48 nodes in (roughly) Lincolnshire: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pqk, out of 6,446 total: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/pql
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-31 11:23:31+00:00): Sorry, bbox is not included in shortlink. So it’s
http://overpass-api.de/api/interpreter?data=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A25%5D%3B%28node%5B%22place%22%3D%22farm%22%5D%28user%3A%22kreuzschnabel%22%29%28newer%3A%222017%2D05%2D14T00%3A00%3A00Z%22%29%2852%2E609719391566%2C%2D0%2E8843994140625%2C53%2E621837552541%2C0%2E37353515625%29%3B%29%3Bout%3B%3E%3Bout%20skel%20qt%3B%0A
versus
http://overpass-api.de/api/interpreter?data=%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A25%5D%3B%28node%5B%22place%22%3D%22farm%22%5D%2852%2E609719391566%2C%2D0%2E8843994140625%2C53%2E621837552541%2C0%2E37353515625%29%3B%29%3Bout%3B%3E%3Bout%20skel%20qt%3B%0A
(I didn’t get exactly the same bbox again)
SomeoneElse (2017-05-31 11:45:01+00:00): Ah OK; Are you going to change these back then?

Obviously there's then a survey job to do to choose between landuse=farmyard, landuse=residential, landuse=industrial place=farm etc., but that can be done later (along with the existing place=farm nodes).
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-31 14:01:54+00:00): Done in CS #49137101. 

- 2,723 single nodes "place=farm" within the entire UK which have been last edited by me after May 13th have been retrieved through overpass-turbo and exported to JOSM (none in N.Ireland, a dozen in Scotland, the rest in Wales and England).

- They have all been changed back from place=farm into landuse=farm.  

- 13 of them had and still have a "fixme" (one in capitals). 

- One was tagged "man_made=Gaileshill Farm", I changed this to "name=Guileshill Farm" (spelling fixed according to OS maps SV and 1:25k).

- I added a tag "note:retag=CS #48756035" to each of them so the lot may easily be selected later if necessary.
SomeoneElse (2017-05-31 14:11:20+00:00): Thanks!
Emilius123 (2022-10-11 13:29:07+00:00): Level0 KING
mike140 (2018-01-22 09:50:07+00:00): Ну и зачем Вы удалили эти ступеньки: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554811520#map=19/50.90982/34.80500 . А 2-й Продольный переулок не доходит до улицы Героев Сумщины. Может прежде чем что-то удалять стоит спросить автора объекта зачем он его создал?
user_5359 (2017-05-17 17:25:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
Hvieira83 (2017-05-17 09:23:46+00:00): Correction: Changed address details
GerdP (2017-08-29 07:06:09+00:00): Hi!
Please review highway=rail on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222217353
This bridge has a lot of tags that differ from the 
connected rails
magol (2017-08-29 20:21:04+00:00): ooooh, I have fix that now. :-)
highflyer74 (2017-05-18 05:54:53+00:00): Hallo thal!

Das source=* Tag ist im Grunde überholt, da die meisten Editoren mittlerweile die Möglichkeit bieten, die Quelle für die Änderungen direkt vor dem Hochladen anzugeben. Dies taucht dann oben, wo jetzt "(kein Kommentar)" steht, auf. Siehe hierzu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source

Gruss aus HB!
highflyer74 (2017-05-18 06:01:08+00:00): Ich muss mich korrigieren: oben taucht normalerweise ein Änderungssatzkommentar auf, den man unbedingt vor dem Hochladen schreiben sollte, damit die anderen Mapper wissen, was man gemacht hat (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments). Schau Dir mal diesen CS an https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48771468. Dort kann man sehen, was gemeint ist.
Dalkvist (2017-05-22 09:46:15+00:00): Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre. 

Det finns flera olika taggar för grönytor och parker i osm och det är inte alltid lätt att veta vilka man ska använda. 

Är det bara den här skogsdungen som är en park, i så fall bör den också taggas med landuse=trees för träden är ju fortfarande där ;)

Om det är mer hela områden mellan bostadsområdet och kanalen så är den redan taggad som som common[1] vilket i Sverige är en lite mindre formellt grönområde.

Om du har några funderingar så får du gärna skicka ett meddelande till mig.

[1]https://osm.org/way/246357850
Commodoortje (2017-05-17 10:18:39+00:00): Welkomst PB verzonden.
Commodoortje (2017-05-17 10:22:57+00:00): Ik zie dat je de adresnodes iets hebt verplaatst, kun je zeggen waarom?
Commodoortje (2017-05-17 10:36:11+00:00): Welkomst PB verzonden.
Commodoortje (2017-05-17 10:40:26+00:00): De kinderboerderij is geen park zoals een park gedefinieerd kan worden. Toch is er een mogelijkheid om een kinderboerderij op OSM te plaatsen.
Inmiddels heb ik je wat hulp verleend, succes met mappen.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48758625
nammala (2017-05-18 05:25:13+00:00): Is this tagging valid, May I know the next actions on this Commodoortje
Commodoortje (2017-05-18 07:20:53+00:00): nammala,
What do you mean exactly?
nammala (2017-05-18 08:26:36+00:00): Just wanted to know is it valid to have park tag inside tourism
Commodoortje (2017-05-18 08:55:36+00:00): I dont see leisure=park anymore.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ut2isn9hee87nwn/2017-05-18_10-54-30.jpg?raw=1
nammala (2017-05-18 09:02:37+00:00): ok Thanks for the prompt response
mueschel (2017-05-19 08:46:43+00:00): Hi,
could you please check this import of nodes? All of them have many foreign keys which should not appear in the OSM data base. The one common key (building=yes) should not be there, because these nodes are not the actual building, which are already in the database.
Jan

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4859448366 
    CITY=Barcelona
    GEOSPECIFI=building
    IDADRESS=1004
    LOCATORDES=addressNumber
    REFCATASTR=8352415DF2785C
    STATE=BC
    ST_NAME=Carrer de l'Atlàntic
    ST_NUM=128
    TIPE=EIS MARITIMO
    ZIP=08040
    addr_city=Barcelona
    addr_house=128
    addr_postc=08040
    building=yes
    name=EIS MARITIMO
    osm_type=node
user_5359 (2018-01-27 18:53:17+00:00): Have there been any reactions or do we have to apply for a revert?
mueschel (2018-01-28 11:09:03+00:00): No, I didn't get a reply.
PortBcn - Planol (2018-11-28 14:27:15+00:00): Hello
I'm responsible of that: Enric Rodellas.
Sorry for delay in response. Raf Roset have notice about this question today.
Lets'me and help me about how repair this. If you think is better to revert and begin again, we do it.
Thanks and please accept my excuses.
Enric Rodellas
user_5359 (2018-11-29 15:25:39+00:00): Hello, I suggest that we reverse the data completely (this changeset). Do you want to do that or should I try?
mueschel (2018-11-29 18:20:32+00:00): user_5359, I agree. Would be good if you could do it - I won't have time in the next days.
pantufla (2024-04-22 18:36:01+00:00): This bad quality import is still around 7 years later. What can we do?
user_5359 (2024-04-24 19:49:34+00:00): I have now deleted the faulty keys after checking them individually. Against my better judgment, I transferred the IDADRESS key to local_ref. A revert of the change data set was not a useful alternative due to the age of the change.
marcknj (2017-05-17 19:54:07+00:00): I tell you again, put the name of the place NOT at name:en, put it just into the normal name box!!!! This would save me time for other things because I always have to fix your edits:(
Commodoortje (2017-05-17 11:20:55+00:00): Ongetwijfeld was je bedoeling goed, maar wat je hebt gedaan, is dat de detaillering hebt verwijderd. Een park is een overkoepeling. 
het grondgebruik (landuse) is grass/forest en (natural) water en het rekreatiedoel (leisure) is een park.
Overigens, niet ieder stukje gras is een park. Een park heeft meestal een naam.
Inmiddels is het teruggezet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Mocht je vragen krijgen, stel ze dan gerust.
rene78 (2017-05-17 19:44:45+00:00): Hi KNaing, careful with using Google images as reference. It is not allowed.
KNaing (2017-05-18 01:29:26+00:00): Hi Rene78, Thanks for your notice.  I forgot remove this comment. I also use Mapbox in Myeik area. Google image is Testing, Indtoduce osm to my frirnds from myeik university, they survey trip to Loikaw Town, but there is no good image in osm. So i make testing other imagery as base map and put data in this condition.
rene78 (2017-05-19 19:16:21+00:00): Great, that you show OSM to your friends. I think, that the OSM map of Myanmar is already better than the competition. Keep up the good work!
samely (2017-05-17 16:52:14+00:00): Hi Amidia... welcome to OSM! Thanks for contributing, I just wanna let you know that you overlapped some building like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494151135/history. We just trace the building itself, the construction and not all the parcel. If you have any doubt you can review any guide about buildings.
Supaplex (2017-07-09 15:46:52+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2018-12-25 21:21:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:31:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:44:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Supaplex (2017-07-09 15:48:05+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
aharvey (2017-05-21 12:52:34+00:00): I see you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/491089771 from highway=construction to residential. Based on your source tag, it doesn't look like a ground survey, did you?

Unless you did a ground survey I think you should leave it as I tagged it.
Superadlen (2017-05-22 14:35:33+00:00): merci kho 
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1118135361531340/
Dalkvist (2017-05-22 09:35:50+00:00): Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre. 

Om du har några funderingar så får du gärna skicka ett meddelande till mig.
freeExec (2017-05-18 05:18:19+00:00): Не нужно указывать такие имена, оно не имя собственное. Удалите за собой.
DaveF (2020-04-11 11:58:54+00:00): Hi
What does 'ref:usrn' represent?
Commodoortje (2017-05-17 11:23:37+00:00): Ongetwijfeld was je bedoeling goed, maar wat je hebt gedaan, is dat de detaillering hebt verwijderd. Een park is een overkoepeling. 
het grondgebruik (landuse) is grass/forest en (natural) water en het rekreatiedoel (leisure) is een park.
Overigens, niet ieder stukje gras is een park. Een park heeft meestal een naam.
Inmiddels is het teruggezet.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Mocht je vragen krijgen, stel ze dan gerust.
user_5359 (2017-05-17 17:30:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the street and replace it with a stream? Does the streets exists any more?

If you need help: You are welcome!
arrowdead (2017-05-18 03:07:42+00:00): I didn't mean to delete the street my mistake. I meant to correct something, there is a small body of water a pond if you will by the street i edited.
user_5359 (2017-05-24 09:21:38+00:00): Because of illness I changed the situation a little later. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/495640472 .
iey6Om7C (2017-05-18 10:15:59+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Скажите пожалуйста, чем Вы руководствовались при заполнении тега "local_ref"?
А также, почему Вы добавили к названиям остановок "Савушкина улица"?
Спасибо.
3bita (2017-05-19 07:38:11+00:00): День добрый. При заполнении local_ref на остановках руководствуюсь в основном картами 2gis. Ели случай сомнительный - сверяюсь дополнительно с картой яндекса.
К названиям остановок добавил улица Савушкина, так как остановка находится на перекрёстке. То есть если остановка на пересечении Савушкина и Липовой аллеи, физически находится на  Савушкина, то я её называл Савушкина улица(Липовая аллея).
Сама по себе липовая аллея довольно длинная, и если назвать остановку Липовая аллея то неясно, в каком именно месте Липовой аллеи она находится, а так становится понятно где остановка из названия.
iey6Om7C (2017-05-19 08:39:09+00:00): Спасибо за разъяснения. По поводу local_ref - я не нашел четкой инструкции по использованию этого тега, поэтому было интересно, может где-то это уже обсуждалось.

К сожалению, использование указанных Вами источников в OSM невозможно из-за [юридических проблем](https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5257). Как житель района, могу подтвердить верность большей части номеров маршрутов в этой и соседних правках, но на будущее прошу учесть этот момент.

Что касается названий остановок, то, согласно [хорошему стилю](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C), отмечать нужно то, что есть на местности, а на табличках "улица Савушкина" отсутствует (как и на сайте Организатора перевозок). Для дополнительной информации можно использовать другие теги, например, [description](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:description). Попробуйте спросить на форуме, может там предложат более универсальный вариант. Я правильно понимаю, что Вы рассматриваете случай поиска остановки, например в навигаторе?