piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
hetzmichnicht (2022-10-06 09:28:03+00:00): ja rüberschieben ist besser, die sind ja nicht weg.
hetzmichnicht (2022-10-06 09:39:25+00:00): weiss aber nicht wie das rüberschieben geht, weil das verlinkt war mit dem gebäude, kein extra poi gesehen. bitte gern so machen wie’s besser ist, ich schaue es mi dann an. danke
user_2066394 (2022-10-06 13:08:32+00:00): Habe den POI mit den ursprünglichen Daten kurz wiederhergestellt, kann dann an die richtige Stelle im Gebäude verschoben werden.
hetzmichnicht (2022-10-07 08:33:50+00:00): danke, ich habe es via Go Map!! ios verschoben. auf openstreetmaps ist nur der Kommentar sichtbar, die Verschiebung nicht. Ich verstehe das noch nicht ganz. Auf openstreetmap.org Safari mobile und Organic Maps ios konnte ich es nicht verschieben. Ich warte mal ab, vielleicht geht das länger.
user_2066394 (2022-10-07 15:00:40+00:00): Verschieben hat geklappt, allerdings ist der POI jetzt doppelt erfasst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10079985334
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100983263
Die kann man noch zusammenführen bei Gelegenheit.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
MatchaHatesGoogle (2022-10-05 04:46:32+00:00): this changeset comment is incorrect, this was not me simplifying water, but mapping more streams
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
adreamy (2024-01-21 15:31:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:첫_걸음#한국의_보안_지역(군사_지역)의_매핑과_훼손행위
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Mingwei (2023-05-22 15:23:22+00:00): Heads up the mixing zone turn lanes, e.g. at Oak onto Scott, are cycleway:right=shared_lane, with sharrows cycleway:right:lane=pictogram
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Aleks-Berlin (2022-10-06 08:28:21+00:00): Hallo B.,
warum änderst du die wikipedia-tags ab, gegen die Anleitung hier?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:wikipedia
MfG, A.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Vincentdesgms (2023-01-27 17:00:39+00:00): My local knowledge: the order of the stops in the street "Rue de Woustviller" is always: Woustviller Forêt -> Woustviller Château d'Eau ->Woustviller Ecole.
It is so in both directions of the bus line. (The timetable of the line 9 is partly wrong)
Please correct.
osm-pt-account 😎 (2023-01-28 05:03:59+00:00): Done.
😎
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-05 05:34:30+00:00): Changed road type to "Driveway" according to user feedback and Bing Maps Aerial #mbx_usa_editing
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-05 22:37:15+00:00): Hi Exokam,

Welcome to OSM! Thanks so much for joining and signing up to contribute.

There's already an area for Windy Hill Open Space Preserve on the map here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/193017

And the peak for Windy Hill is also already on the map here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4407402851

Is the peak in the wrong position? For now, I have removed the duplicate feature you added.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
martien-176 (2022-10-07 15:51:53+00:00): Hi Robert, i am reviewing and validating in this project. Thanks for mapping.

There are unfortunately a few issues here:
* Please avoid mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.
* Always square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. Except of course when the building has another shape
* Avoid buildings sharing nodes or else overlapping

Kind regards,

Martien, HOT Global Validator
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127028087
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
limes11 (2022-10-05 08:28:37+00:00): Hallo Heiner, 

'permit' ist hier nicht korrekt. Der Tag wird verwendet, falls eine Erlaubnis auf Anfrage in der Regel erteilt wird. Der VVS vergibt diese ja nur in Ausnahmefällen. 

'private' war hier korrekt. Wenn wir hier mit access=private arbeiten, müssen wir auch noch die horse-tags setzen. motor_vehicle=private war hier die pragmatische Lösung. 

(Stehen da VZ250? VZ251? Weiß ich nicht mehr, da hängt auf jeden Fall dieses lustige "Hier gilt die StVO und nicht, was Ihr Navi sagt" - Schild)

VG, Limes
HeinerSchaefer (2022-10-05 18:53:25+00:00): Hallo Limes,
da steht ein VZ260, also "Verbot für Kraftfahrzeuge". Und dann halt die Ausnahme mit der VVS Genehmigung und der Navi-Hinweis.

Das 'permit' gibt es nicht so sehr selten. 
Ohne könnte niemand zum Parkplatz der Hirschburg fahren. Also wird jeder Teilnehmer einer Veranstaltung dort ein 'permit' bekommen.
Dazu kommen alle Mitarbeiter, Lieferanten usw. des Drachenfels.

Bei der Auffahrt zum Ölberg habe ich ähnliches Tagging vorgenommen.  und bei der Str. zur Rosenau müsste man das auch noch tun. Auch die Privat-Str. sind so ausgeschildert.

Also eigentlich ist es jetzt nicht falsch?
Oder hab ich was übersehen?

Grüße
Heiner
limes11 (2022-10-05 19:51:42+00:00): Hallo Heiner, 

'access=permit' ist leider quasi undokumentiert, lediglich in der englischen Wiki findet sich etwas dazu. 
Primär ist es gedacht, um Zugangsbeschränkungen z.B. in Nationalparks abzubilden, in denen Genehmigungen beantragt werden müssen, aber für *jeden* zu erlangen und in der Regel auch erteilt werden (eine Formalität sozusagen). 

Hier ist die Situation anders. Lieferanten, Besucher der Hirschburg, Mitarbeiter des Restaurant, all das sind Sonderfälle. Wer nicht zu diesem Kreis zählt, erhält keine Erlaubnis vom VVS.

Aus ganz pragmatischer Sicht ist der Tag an dieser Stelle auch problematisch. Wie werten Router dies aus? Es klingt stark nach 'permissive', was korrekterweise als routable gewertet wird. Jedes Wochenende fahren hier dutzende Autos mit Touristen den Berg hoch, die Idee, einen Poller anzubringen, wurde leider nie umgesetzt. Hier jetzt ein schwer verständliches, kaum unterstütztes Tag zu verwenden, davon würde ich abraten.

VG, Limes
HeinerSchaefer (2022-10-06 16:45:00+00:00): Hallo Limes,
erst mal muss ich zugeben, das ich das Wiki zum Thema nicht gelesen hatte. Ich fand es so eindeutig. So kann man sich täuschen!

Hatte mir auch nochmal die Auffahrt zur Rosenau angesehen. Dort ist motor_vehicle=private eingetragen.
Das werde ich dann jetzt hier und auch an der Auffahrt zum Ölberg so eintragen. Damit wären dann die drei Privat-Str. gleich.

Und gerade heute war ein Artikel im GA zum Thema genehmigte und ungenehmigte Autofahrten auf diesen Straßen. Die Poller sollen jetzt im nächsten Jahr kommen....

Grüße
Heiner
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:29:46+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127133720
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-05 05:56:25+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=45.406944%2C-93.262838%2C16.43
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:31:00+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127133759
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:31:47+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127133797
hatul (2022-11-30 15:18:31+00:00): בבקשה להפסיק להוסיף את נחש בסוגריים. שמות חלופיים מסומנים עם התגית alt_name וזה כבר בוצע.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 10:16:06+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242785057/history has roof = flat that was added in this edit
Maybe roof:shape=flat was intended here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:shape and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof
thepriben (2026-01-19 18:07:10+00:00): Fixed.
Thank you for pointing that out.
& Happy new year!!!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:01:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
Polarbear (2022-10-06 19:05:13+00:00): Could you please explain why you removed "place=city" from the place node?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:28:38+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10076369289/history
Benoît C MdP (2022-10-07 05:55:13+00:00): Bonjour dlzv,

Y a un couloir bus dans ce secteur de la rue d'Amsterdam ? ça fait plus de 2 ans que les bus n'y passent plus et qu'il a été supprimé.

Bonne continuation

Benoît
dlzv (2022-10-07 07:05:33+00:00): Bonjour,
Non il n'y en a pas. Ils sont en train de faire des travaux pour pérenniser une piste cyclable, mais de voie bus.
Bonne journée
Benoît C MdP (2022-10-07 07:17:21+00:00): Ce ne sera pas une piste cyclable mais une vélorue.
Du coup, c'est bien une erreur de contribution. Je vais corriger.

Benoît
literan (2022-10-06 06:54:52+00:00): вроде бы пишут на roads.ru, что выезд из Зеленой Рощи в обе стороны есть

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/55.58999/36.89168
impiaaa (2022-10-05 19:16:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap. In OSM the convention is to only map one line per road, only splitting when there's a physical separation between two sections. You can read this article on how to model intersections: https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/
impiaaa (2022-10-05 19:20:05+00:00): This change has been reverted in changeset 127063935.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-05 07:34:29+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=33.366901%2C-105.715419%2C16.72
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:32:30+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127133825
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:32:48+00:00): Again, please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ToniE (2022-10-05 08:04:49+00:00): Servus, guten Morgen,

ein Grund mehr für mich dort vor Ort mal vorbei zu schauen. Hatte für irgendwann eh mal eine Mapping-Radtour über Aying, Münster, Piusheim, Jakobsbaiern, Unterlaus, Percha, Aschbach, Blindham, ... geplant.

Ist die Frage, ob die betroffenen Wege dann immer noch highway=track oder =service sind? Ist aber nicht so wichtig.

Gruß
Toni
Floppy919 (2022-10-05 08:34:03+00:00): Hallo Toni,
ohne es genau zu wissen, gehe ich nicht davon aus, dass sich an der grundsätzlichen Wegebeschaffenheit etwas geändert hat. Aufgrund der gelegentlichen (in der Realität aber vermutlich extrem selten stattfindenden) Nutzung des neuen Bedarfsbusses (hier werden Kleinbusse in der Größenkategorie eines VW Crafters eingesetzt) könnte highway=service geeigneter sein. Aber sich auf eine Kategorie festzulegen fiel mir an dieser Stelle schwer, daher habe ich den track mal so belassen, wie er war.

Vielen Dank und viele Grüße,
Flo
Sanniu (2025-01-08 07:57:44+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333122376 do not have street name in address, may you add?
Sanniu (2025-01-08 08:49:55+00:00): And https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333771495 too
eggie (2022-10-05 09:48:10+00:00): Hi VLD  According the BGT Burgemeester Huijbregts-Schiedonlaan is the correct name.

I corrected the streetname. 
Greetz,
eggie
VLD548 (2022-10-07 12:17:52+00:00): Thanks for correcting. I agree.
abakus_uploader (2022-10-05 22:31:13+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2022-10-15 10:50:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127034668
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-05 08:24:06+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=45.045908%2C-93.270541%2C18.09
Mevess (2023-01-29 21:57:30+00:00): Bonjour,
En France, les espèces sont obligatoirement acceptés, donc l'attribut payment:cash me semble superflu.
De plus comment est il possible que les espèces soit le seul moyen de paiement mais que l'on puisse payer par carte ?
NJ
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127034728
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2023-01-30 14:18:54+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre alerte
Nous avons corrigé car c'est une erreur de saisie transmise.

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB
SomeoneElse_Revert (2025-11-01 14:02:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 174063813, 174063778, 174063039, 174063675, 174063839, 174063864, 174063733, 174063852, 174063722, 174063049, 174063081, 174063378, 174063746, 174063119, 174063802, 174063878 where the changeset comment is: Following a DWG complaint, reverting a dubious import.  See e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1311170850 https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/18848
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 23:25:29+00:00): Reverted addition of SEO spam POI with blatantly promotional description and malformed address and phone tags that doesn't exist at this location per their own website

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/183759032
◪ Jarv (2022-10-06 00:16:19+00:00): Hi Jez, I've seen you have added some of the bike hangers in Brighton and tagged them as "amenity=bicycle_repair_station" due to lack of suitable other tags.

bicycle_repair_station is not a good idea for the bicycle hangers as these are usually stands which have bicycle related tools such as Allen Keys, screwdrivers, pumps etc.

The best way to tag these IMO would be
"amenity=bicycle_parking" with "access=permit" along with operator & fee as applicable tags.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_parking for more information.
Jez Nicholson (2022-10-06 06:39:03+00:00): Yeah, it was lack of tags in Vespucci whilst I was on the spot, I was going to change them when I got home.....and then forgot. :( Will do it now
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Lillianscentperfume (2023-01-19 19:08:59+00:00): This is my correct location
gscholz (2022-10-06 07:36:04+00:00): Hi maria2001m,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue marker):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=30.50684&lat=37.87732&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127037273

This kind of error irritates routing software (and looks ugly on the maps). Can you please fix this?

Probably you may also like to educate yourself about what a "motorway" means:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway

The assignment for this small street seems to be wrong here as well.

Can you please fix this as well?

Kind regards
Guido