piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
hyto (2015-02-06 04:21:33+00:00): Me llevó mucha lectura, pero recuerdo que Bing (yahoo primero) permiten copiar el trazado de las calles pero expresamente prohibe utilizar cualquier otro dato o información, eso incluye el nombre de las calles.
Yo en aquel entonces quería ponerle nombre a las calles de Santana do Livramento, incluso tengo un mapa de Santana, pero no lo utilicé porque ni siquiera tenía idea de quien era el autor original.
hyto (2015-02-06 04:24:46+00:00): Aquí explica que solo se puede utilizar la información aerea y no se puede utilizar otras información, entre ellos los nombres de las calles.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing
neluy1611 (2015-02-09 13:27:18+00:00): Ahora si me cierra, Gracias hyto (yo al ver que eran mapas de Bing y que muralito me había dicho que según la zona el mapa base de edición es de Bing o no recuerdo quien mas ya di por entendido que la info.de calles también se podía usar)
Self-Perfection (2015-02-06 10:41:47+00:00): Здравствуйте!

Обратите внимание, что по принятой схеме обозначения адресов ( http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr:housenumber ) номер корпуса пишется слитно с буквой к, без пробела между ними. Я поправил.

Вообще перед использованием каких-либо тегов стоит посмотрение описание их использование в вики.
zarl (2016-09-10 15:59:50+00:00): Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/573901 gibt es eine Note zu deinem changeset.
Mike Baggaley (2015-02-18 17:03:08+00:00): Hi, to mark a road as private, I believe you should set the tag access=private, rather than setting name=(private). The name field should only contain the name by which the road is nationally known, and if there is no such name, it should be empty.

Regards,
Mike
OffTheChart (2015-02-18 17:17:06+00:00): Unless the map is rendered in everyone's interests (impossible!), I believe the private status is sometimes better spelled out for all to see as guidance. Otherwise it may encourage trespass. I realise this may be controversial :)
Mike Baggaley (2015-02-18 18:18:43+00:00): Hi, roads tagged with access=private are clearly shown in pink in the standard OSM rendered map. Users extracting map data for their own purposes can also easily determine that a road is private and take appropriate action (e.g. don't allow routing along it in a GPS). This is not possible using a name. Adding a name of private also causes the index of road names to include one named private. Guidelines on what should go in the name tag is available at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
OffTheChart (2015-02-18 22:17:48+00:00): Fine, change it if you like :)
kuhni74 (2023-05-20 19:44:54+00:00): die Heinrichshöhe (3331812255) ist laut FJLA und FK weiter westlich, wobei in beiden Kartenwerken die Lage wegen des Blattschnitts nicht ganz klar ist
fkv (2023-05-20 20:30:34+00:00): Mir war (und ist) sie auch nicht klar. Darum das fixme=*.
hlaw (2015-02-06 19:10:30+00:00): Don't think this should be encouraged although it might not be illegal. Checked transport department's e-routing and it does not advise U turn here.  It should be up to the driver to take the risk.
Weide (2015-02-06 07:06:26+00:00): Neue platform war in 6 PTv2-Relationen ganz hinten (also als Endstation) eingetragen. Erledigt.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-10 13:23:51+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

This edit and your immediately subsequent one seemed to just drag a few things around on a business park (which have now since been undone).  If you want somewhere to "practice" you might find http://opengeofiction.net/ appropropriate - no-one there is going to complain that what's on the map doesn't match the real world!

However, if you do want to map the real world, then I'm sure that there are lots of things to add around Hampshire.

Cheers,
Andy
4rch (2015-02-09 15:42:05+00:00): This edit damaged the following administrative boundary: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/347287
4rch (2015-02-09 15:49:32+00:00): I've tried to repair the boundary. Please check if all is ok know.

Here is a hole without an administrative unit, is this ok? http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=43.2748&mlon=-2.8946#map=15/43.2748/-2.8946
dieterdreist (2015-02-27 12:13:39+00:00): I have reverted this changeset because it didn't contain significant contributions as far as I've seen, but did contain some significant deletion.
trigpoint (2015-02-05 23:57:53+00:00): Hi Makda, should the paths not connect to something so that they can we accessed?
Makda (2015-02-06 10:01:29+00:00): they allow pedestrians to go across the roundabout than around - so they connect to the pedestrian crossings across the path of cars - is there is a way to show that ? - Take a look at the satellite imagery.
trigpoint (2015-02-06 10:42:12+00:00): Hi Makda
You should add footways that connect to the road at the crossing points and then continue them to join the other paths.
You may need to move the traffic lights back to the stop line and then change the node where the footway and road intersect to highway=crossing.

Keep up the good mapping.
Phil
Peter Maiwald (2015-04-21 13:06:13+00:00): Die Berliner Allee kann man nicht queren zwischen Pistoriusstr. und Indira-Ghandi-Str. Wie kommt der driveway dort hin über mehrere Änderungssätze?
Peter Maiwald (2015-04-21 13:06:42+00:00): Die Berliner Allee kann man nicht queren zwischen Pistoriusstr. und Indira-Ghandi-Str. Wie kommt der driveway dort hin über mehrere Änderungssätze?
Владимир К (2016-02-29 13:46:56+00:00): А там точно прям контейнеры для приема мусора на переработку? не на свалку?
marczoutendijk (2021-12-22 19:35:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/320252451
water=Zuiver staat niet beschreven in de wiki. Het past ook niet goed bij waar de key 'water=*' voor wordt gebruikt.
U bent de enige mapper die deze tagging gebuikt. Wat is precies de bedoeling?
nikkinikki (2016-06-17 09:01:57+00:00): Why do only some of the names include "Triq", "Sqaq", etc? Were they copied from another map?
AndriesWijma (2016-09-06 09:35:27+00:00): Dat stuk heide bij Olterterp heet 'eindeloze kapvlakte'? Het staat niet met hoofdletters en ik vind het een wat vreemde naam.
dchiles (2015-02-12 20:04:31+00:00): This seems like an overcomplicated way to map a toll plaza.
robert (2015-02-07 15:54:52+00:00): Here, you could have removed the "indian restaurant" tagging without removing the entire node (that contains really useful address (housenumber) data - presumably the address is still there it hasn't got up and walked away).
I've restored this now for you (without the restaurant).
_al (2015-02-06 08:05:05+00:00): Hallo!

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Keiner Hinweis: bitte nicht name=Wohnblock, name=Parkplatz, sondern building=apartments oder amenity=parking.

Weiterhin viel Spaß mit OSM!

Servus, Andreas
Peter Maiwald (2015-04-21 13:11:06+00:00): Die Berliner Allee kann man nicht queren zwischen Pistoriusstr. und Indira-Ghandi-Str. Wie kommt der driveway dort hin über mehrere Änderungssätze?
Constable (2017-02-21 18:44:25+00:00): Ciao, questo nodo https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3332355389 e questo poligonohttps://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326570623 contengono gli stessi tag; puoi rimuovere il nodo per favore? Adesso come adesso risultano due baite e non mi sembra verosimile.
Grazie ciao
grazie
cadsauxk (2015-02-10 18:29:46+00:00): Uma relação de restrição de conversão é sempre de uma via (from) para outra via (to) passando por um ponto determinado.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Adicionar uma restrição de conversão, onde se proíbe retornar na própria via (from=to) não faz sentido dentro das regras do OSM. Em especial para vias de mão única.

Se você tem problemas de roteamento por favor entre em contato com os mapeadores no Talk-BR e discuta esses problemas ao invés de introduzir artifícios.
Nakaner (2015-02-08 13:08:14+00:00): Für Telefonnummern gibt es eine "vorgeschriebene" Syntax https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone und für Rechtsanwälte ein spezielles Tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Dlawyer
muralito (2015-02-05 21:53:12+00:00): Hola. 
¿Cual es el motivo de dejar solo el apellido?
¿En todo caso el nombre abreviado no iria en short_name?

Otra duda similar con invertir nombre y apellido. La convencion es Nombre Apellido, o sea que iria "Alfredo Palacios", o "Alfredo Lorenzo Palacios", pero no "Palacios Alfredo"
muralito (2015-02-16 13:02:22+00:00): Bien. Primero que nada, la situacion con la busqueda en Garmin no era muy feliz, pero te cuento que afortunadamente con ese problema de la busqueda en los Garmin hubo avances en los ultimos tiempos y fue solucionado en la herramienta que genera los mapas a partir de OSM. Lamentablemente fue algo que demoro mucho en solucionarse pero hay que tener en cuenta que es en base a estudio y esfuerdo de los desarrolladores porque Garmin no publica las especificaciones para poder fabricarle mapas. Eso lo que hay que esperar es que salgan mapas actualizados con eso solucionado (o fabricarselos uno mismo)

La busqueda funcionaba mal, yo tengo un 1300 y un 2455 y hasta muy recientemente estaba ese problema pendiente.

Tambien se mejoro hace poco el tema de restringir correctamente la busqueda de una calle a una ciudad determinada.

Con eso creo que el tema de las busquedas estaria solucionado, te recomiendo seguir este hilo. http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=17139  (habria que confirmal que los mapas actualizados tengan funcionando los indices con multiples palabras)

Desconozco Tom Tom como para comentarte al respecto, pero encuentro los nuvi no tiene rivales en los navegadores que he visto para moviles que son complicados de usar.

El tener un "name", "short_name" y todos los demas _name da la libertad al programa que usa los datos para que use el que le sirva en cada caso.

Uno de los principios en OSM es "no mapear para el renderizador", sino arreglar el renderizasdor para que haga lo correcto, lo que aplicado en este caso viene a ser no alterar (artificialmente) los nombres de las calles, sino hacer lo que sea necesario para que la busqueda funcione bien, que como te comente fue lo que se hizo.

El criterio general, en OSM, es que los nombres sean los que estan en la carteleria,  aunque sin abreviaciones.

Y ante cualquer duda, por temas locales siempre tenes el foro de OSM Argentina http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=49 
que capaz que te sirve o capaz que te crea mas dudas.

Dale para adelante.

Abrazo,
M.
Jojo4u (2015-02-05 20:20:41+00:00): Erstes Gebäude und gleich Multipolygon? Respekt! ;) Das way=yes am inner ist unnötig und damit falsch:

"Ansonsten erhalten die inneren Linienzüge keine Attribute."
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon#Verwendung
globosound (2015-02-27 07:50:26+00:00): Kontaktdaten editiert
Jojo4u (2015-02-24 13:31:26+00:00): Ja, ist genau so ok.
eggie (2024-02-28 11:29:16+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen bij deze alsnog
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2015-02-06 09:49:01+00:00): Unfortunately http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324359481 still doesn't _quite_ join West Street.  You can see by looking at that "browse" page - the first node says "part of ways" but the last node doesn't.
robert (2015-02-07 13:17:42+00:00): Try not to use general descriptions for "name"s. The "name" tag is meant more for specific names of objects. I've removed some of these and added a specific parking tag to your parking area.
robert (2015-02-07 13:19:23+00:00): Oh and there's also a specific "retail building" tag. I've switched the commercial building to that too.
naoliv (2015-02-06 00:20:36+00:00): chambito, essa área que você apagou estava correta.
Outra coisa é que não é correto colocar o nome de "área verde" nas áreas verdes. O próprio tipo do objeto já define isso.
Nakaner (2015-11-01 10:45:18+00:00): Hallo luchs12,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz zahlreiche Objekte um mehrere Meter verschoben und gibst als Quelle "Luftbilder" an. Um welche Luftbilder handelt es sich denn, die du verwendet hast?

Viele Grüße

Michael
luchs12 (2015-11-01 18:40:56+00:00): Hi,
verwendet habe ich die von Bing bereitgestellten Luftbilder mit einem Offset auf Grundlage der GPS-Tracks. Lässt hier und da leider etwas Spielraum. 
Gruß
Nakaner (2015-11-01 19:45:10+00:00): Könntest du die Tracks, falls noch nicht geschehen, bitte nochladen? https://www.openstreetmap.org/trace/create

Dann kann nämlich jeder den Offset nachvollziehen. Bevor ich im großen Stil mit einem Luftbild Sachen verschiebe, lade ich mir erstmal die Tracks der Gegend herunter (in dem Fall wäre es ganz Parchim gewesen). Leider sieht es im Bahnhofsumfeld recht dünn aus. (Da Tracks einen nicht geringen Fehler haben, schenke ich ihnen erst Glauben, wenn ein ganzes Bündel von ihnen auf einer Straße vorhanden ist und ich den Fehler durch Mittelung reduzieren kann).
luchs12 (2015-11-02 06:33:29+00:00): Genutzt hab ich die vorhandenen GPS-Tracks. Die Daten sind leider etwas mager. Daher kann es sein dass auch GPS-Tracks außerhalb des Gebietes für den Offset genutzt wurden.
utack (2015-08-29 20:17:06+00:00): Der Laden heißt jetzt anders.
Evtl hat das jemand im Kopf?
Telefonnummer ist aber geblieben
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-02-05 23:12:33+00:00): dodanie nazwy "Rondo" nie sprawi, że stanie się rondem - trzeba jeszcze dodać tag junction=roundabout. Oprócz tego trzeba zadbać o kierunkowość dojazdów do ronda.
Xapitoun (2015-08-31 00:56:13+00:00): lots of bad things in Haiti' particularly admin boundaries
wambacher (2015-08-31 07:58:52+00:00): http://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/301-countries-compare-2015-08-31

go and fix them
cadsauxk (2015-12-05 13:09:19+00:00): Por favor, não marque vias residenciais como track. A tag track é somente para vias agrícolas ou trilhas. Use a tag highway=residential e surface=unpaved para indicação a não-pavimentação. Obrigado.
Linhares (2015-12-07 16:59:58+00:00): Eu fiz isso?!?

Oh, não! Por favor, me perdoe, professor Gerald!!!
cadsauxk (2015-12-07 23:35:45+00:00): Haha, sem problemas :) Até estranhei você fazer isto. Mas eu gosto de avisar quando eu vou mexer nos dados inseridos por outras pessoas. Abraço!
smaprs (2015-02-07 21:02:53+00:00): O chalé virou quadrado?
Warin61 (2020-05-19 12:08:26+00:00): Hi,

These are tagged with source:name=* .. but there is no name=*. Possibly better as  source:building=*???
Xmypblu (2015-02-07 06:49:10+00:00): с чем связано удаление зданий?  
почему нет комментария к пакету правки?
Джон-007 (2015-02-07 07:00:14+00:00): Снесли по программе переселения из ветхого и аварийного жилья.
Xmypblu (2015-02-07 07:12:13+00:00): ок, если не затруднит, на их месте - поставь точку с тегом "note=Снесли по программе переселения" чтобы не отрисовали снова по снимку. Точки достаточно одной.
frosm (2019-05-31 11:11:17+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/326681039
vous souvenez-vous ce que c'est exactement ? c'est une salle privé qu'on peux louer ? c'est une infrastructure genre la salle des fêtes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre ?
freeExec (2015-02-06 08:25:19+00:00): Там что знак повесили запрещающий?
Зарипов Тимур (2015-02-06 08:38:06+00:00): привет, нет, программа не правильно на меж.город прокладывает. Если надо ехать в мамадыш, то он отправляет через покровку, а должен через челны. На всех других сервисах (навигациях), этой дороги нет.
freeExec (2015-02-06 08:53:22+00:00): Ну раз нет знака, значит и нет запрета. И почему это он должен через Челны? Во общем-то это проблема алгоритма навигации, а не данных. Ставьте галочку использовать автомагистрали, не использовать ледовые переправы и будет вам счастье.
ggArmenia (2015-02-06 10:12:44+00:00): hunasatani despanatun
PmaiIkeey (2015-03-27 01:00:07+00:00): 2 slot post box - put 2 refs in the ref field.
MapperIAm (2015-03-27 08:54:07+00:00): I had tried but was unaware on how to do it, so added a second box. Sooks like your semicolon works. Thanks
zarl (2016-09-08 13:44:09+00:00): Advanced MENTZ mapping?

Das mit dem "not finished" glaube ich sofort. Die hier als doppelt eingetragenen POIs dürften alle von dir stammen: http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=16&lat=48.14888&lon=11.46331&layer=Mapnik&overlays=FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFT&item=4080&level=1&tags=&fixable=

Könntest du das bitte mal ausmisten?

Danke,
Zarl
Ten Moons Lipe Resort (2015-02-06 10:43:07+00:00): Viewpoint Bungalows Resort has been renovatedby the new owner and is now named Ten Moons Lipe Resort
SomeoneElse (2015-02-19 13:28:15+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You may have noticed that "Tenbury High School" that you added the other day doesn't appear on any of the maps on the OpenStreetMap.org site.  The reason for this is that although it has a name, it doesn't have anything saying what sort of thing it is.  Normally for a school you'd add an area around the outside (including all the school grounds) and say that it's a school.  In the editor, if you click on where it says "area" at the top left and search for "school" you can select either "school grounds" or "school building".  You can add "school grounds" all the way around the outside, and then add "school buildings" inside (currently your newly added area seems to include the buildings, but also bits of road and car park).
Anyway, hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help.  Any questions please do get in touch.
tbicr (2015-02-06 15:52:41+00:00): Чаму замест БелЗЭБ (БелЗнешЭканомБанк) выкарыстоўваецца БелВЭБ (БезВнешЭкономБанк) для беларускай мовы?
tbicr (2015-02-06 16:02:06+00:00): http://www.nbrb.by/system/banks.asp
alex73 (2015-02-07 07:01:41+00:00): А, дзякуй. Добрая спасылка. Я карыстаўся http://select.by/content/view/334/319/
alex73 (2015-02-09 07:34:49+00:00): Не, сапраўды БелВЭБ. "Адкрытае акцыянернае таварыства "Белзнешэканамбанк"
(ААТ "Банк БелВЭБ")". Такое скарачэньне афіцыйнае
tbicr (2015-02-09 07:44:40+00:00): На самой справе даволі дзіўнае выключэнне, таму што астатнія банкі ідуць у перакладзе і частка ААТ переклад.
alex73 (2015-02-09 07:50:43+00:00): Ёсьць яшчэ БПС-Сбербанк
PmaiIkeey (2015-03-27 01:02:04+00:00): Mail box - is this a 'new' box ? It doesn't appear on any imagery.
MapperIAm (2015-03-27 08:51:24+00:00): What imagery would it be that it doesn't appear on? Google Street view is all I can think you would use? May I remind you it's seemingly illegal to use google's copyrighted pictures to update OSM.
As for is this new? you'd have to define new because it's not that new to me, has been there for quite a long time. However, it does not seem to be on google street view, which is dated May 2009 putting the date of the box as being fitted in the last 6 years
elazarev (2015-02-06 15:52:19+00:00): None! source=wikipedia
SomeoneElse (2015-05-26 17:49:03+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3334096485 really a peak?  What evidence is there that this name applies to the hill at the top, as opposed to just the wood?  Is there a sign on the ground or some other indication?
SomeoneElse (2015-02-11 18:20:51+00:00): Why have you added a duplicate "Puffin Island" here http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3334123665 ?  See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/322941508 .

Just because some old name appears on an old out of copyright map doesn't mean that it makes sense to assume that it applies to a "natural=peak"  with that name at that location.  The driving principle should be http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element .
berndw (2015-02-06 19:05:45+00:00): wheelchair=yes bedeutet ebenen Eingang, behindertengerechte Einrichtung incl. Toilette.
Zumindest die Treppe am Eingang würde nur für eine wheelchair=limited ausreichen, dann ist aber auch eine Beschreibung der Beschränkung erforderlich
Walter Schlögl (2015-02-20 20:33:28+00:00): Falls das ein Lebensmittelgeschäft ist, bitte als shop=supermarket oder convenience erfassen.
tbsprs (2015-02-08 15:26:51+00:00): Thank you.
tbsprs (2015-02-08 16:36:40+00:00): I saw the Umweltzone Tübingen has holes. And the city publishes the same information. But how should that work? How should one get there? Is there no roading leading through the holes? It does not make sense to me with simply holes. We should contact the government and ask. What do you think, seichter?
seichter (2015-02-08 23:57:40+00:00): The boundary of the city of Tübingen is the official boundary of the LEZ. Since there are two exclaves within the area, the LEZ has two holes.
It doesn't make much sense but that's the published state by Regierungspräsidium Tübingen.
DemoLogin (2018-07-06 14:55:49+00:00): Тегирование остановки как amenity=shelter не верно. Вместо этого тега должно было быть shelter=yes.
4rch (2015-02-06 19:20:54+00:00): Viel Spaß, aber trag bitte so etwas nicht in OpenStreetMap ein sondern nutze Services wie z.B. http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/de/
gormo (2015-02-09 15:36:02+00:00): ...und vergiss nicht, auch beim Trekking Daten für OSM zu sammeln!
elazarev (2015-02-06 15:54:40+00:00): Note: source=wikipedia
SomeoneElse (2015-02-10 10:42:45+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I notice that you've deleted the name of http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3275313321/history - it was apparently "Ali Baba" until 10 days ago.  If it's something different now I'd just change the name to what it now is.  Or perhaps you were trying to change something else and the name got removed by mistake?

Anyway, hope you don't mind me mentioning this - if you've got any questions, please don't hesitate to get in touch.
Cheers,
Andy
Skelos (2015-02-06 15:08:08+00:00): Nomi degli edifici come da piano antiincendio (ultime pagine)
http://www.centrodirezionalecolleoni.com/docs/Procedure_aziende.pdf
PlaneMad (2018-03-03 09:19:21+00:00): Namaste, thank you for your mapping. Nice work!
PlaneMad (2018-03-03 09:30:42+00:00): I have added more details, please check
Skelos (2015-02-06 15:07:48+00:00): Nomi degli edifici come da piano antiincendio (ultime pagine)
http://www.centrodirezionalecolleoni.com/docs/Procedure_aziende.pdf
luiswoo (2015-02-07 00:14:27+00:00): пешеходный переход -- это highway=crossing, а не highway=footway, она же пешеходная дорожка, данный тег вешается только на линию.
luiswoo (2015-02-07 00:16:34+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C
d1g (2015-02-06 17:17:29+00:00): Вандал без знаний местности!
lampropeltis (2015-02-06 16:48:28+00:00): The city boundaries you're adding make no sense and make the map a mess. You may be confusing county boundaries with these ever changing, and cluttering city boundaries. The reason I removed them, or was cleaning them up is because nobody here in Helena knows what they are (including state GIS folks) and they don't add any worthwhile reference to the map for anyone. The line are worthless clutter.
lampropeltis (2015-02-23 17:32:03+00:00): Here is a link to accurate city boundaries for Montana: http://mslapps.mt.gov/Geographic_Information/Data/DataList/datalist_Details.aspx?did={4CBDB922-0B2F-40BC-9196-3CC46B59D852}

The tiger data is just complete junk.
JohnDoe23 (2015-02-09 01:40:14+00:00): Whats the intention of this edit? Please bear in mind the Mechanical Edit Policy: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edit_Policy
Nakaner (2015-02-09 14:07:20+00:00): It is also discussed at the German forum http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=30016
osmbuildings (2015-02-10 12:54:49+00:00): This 'correction' is a regression.
TV tower's sphere now turned into a cylinder + a dome-shaped roof. Please revert.
Graf Westerholt (2016-12-26 11:14:25+00:00): Hast du hier das PH=off vergessen? Siehe http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?setLng=de
mighty_eighty (2017-01-21 11:07:59+00:00): Jepp. Zur damaligen Zeit hielt ich es für optional.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-29 18:23:02+00:00): Can you explain why you added "(historical)" to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/151451105 ?

Is it no longer used name? Is it really a name with (historical) as its part?