piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2018-01-21 05:09:17+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
pra_sad (2019-05-14 16:00:39+00:00): Hi Riyadi Wibowo,

Trust you are well. While reviewing Bandung, we came across way 435418497
way 435427920
way 540575502
way 435427918
way 689926898
way 689926897
classified as 'Primary'. However going by aerial imagery and other ways around, it seems "Residential".

And for the 
way 540575498
way 238522576
way 689948151 direct has been changed to Bi-directional from one way

As of now making edits, Please revert if not.

Thanks in advance.
ztztztz (2017-12-26 12:24:10+00:00): Why do you delete the uyghur name from the name label of all the counties?
Austin Zhu (2017-12-27 01:26:00+00:00): Because it is unnecessary to do so. Simplified Chinese is the official language of mainland China. And they already have the name: ug (maybe) tags. FYI, I seldom see other multilingual countries do so, such as India. See china tagging guideline page on OpenStreetMap wiki.

Greetings
OpenStreetMap Chinese community
GerdP (2017-11-16 07:46:26+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=hi on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540588776
patrik6761 (2017-11-16 10:29:23+00:00): Hey, i will fix this later today. Thank you.
Glassman (2017-11-15 18:41:22+00:00): I reversed George Creek direction. Rivers and streams should be the same as the direction as the water flow. Also, the path, Asotin Waterfront Trail ends in the Chief Looking Glass park but doesn't connect to the service road and parking lot. Should it? By making a connection, it will enable routers to do multimodal routing.
woodpeck (2017-11-23 22:54:39+00:00): Hello FreedSky, please start using changeset comments to describe what you are editing - at least in cases where it is likely that more people will be interested, for example like this changeset where you edited the border between China and India. What is your source for this edit? Why was this edit made? Things like that belong in the changeset comment so that others watching the area can see what is happening, *especially* when you edit anything like borders or names. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more explanation.
FreedSky (2018-02-09 16:10:48+00:00): I made some revisions based on the boundary data and actual satellite imagery. There are some discrepancies in the frontier. Of course, my guess may be wrong, but I try my best to be neutral. My amendment to this large boundary Is based on this logic, so nothing to say, I do not like to write a reason. Sorry
WalkerB (2017-11-16 14:18:49+00:00): Hey Zahid, Thanks for adding the school.  The area you tagged should be tagged as School grounds, not as a school building.  Each individual building would be a building.  Also, please remember to hold Alt when putting polygons near roads.  The polygon should not be connected to the roads.
WalkerB (2017-11-16 14:24:29+00:00): This is really well done!  nice job getting the building footprint and not the roof.  This says Building 18 Zahid.  Is Zahid the name of the building?  If so, please leave it.  If this is because someone lives there, please remove the names.  OSM is for physical things, not people, ethnic groups , or demographics.
WalkerB (2017-11-16 14:21:05+00:00): Thanks for adding the Gym.  Remember to digitize the footprint of the building (Square/rectangle) and not the roof, which has many angles.
WalkerB (2017-11-16 14:22:10+00:00): This park is really well done!  The areas do not connect to the roads, Exactly right!
nevw (2017-11-15 11:39:30+00:00): Hi
can you check the name please as I see Coakers Lane is labeled as Coakers Road on the LPI  NSW Basemap as well as others maps.
sylloge (2017-11-15 12:30:19+00:00): fixed, I've been calling it a lane for 5 years incorrectly
nevw (2017-11-15 13:07:57+00:00): Thanks
WalkerB (2017-11-16 13:36:59+00:00): Hey Zahid, thanks for adding MRRD and NRAP.  When you put in buildings, can you make sure that the buildings have square corners?  To do that, select the building (not a single point) and hit "s", that will "square" the corners to 90-degrees.  Also, on your comment, you can write in Dari if it's more comfortable.  For adding building's you can simply write "Added Schools, Ministries"...)  Keeping it simple works
WalkerB (2017-11-16 14:10:17+00:00): Also, make sure that areas are not "snapped" to roads.  Hold down 'Alt' while clicking and it will prevent that from happening.
user_5359 (2017-11-20 19:47:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .

There aren't any location based value!
user_5359 (2017-11-15 19:58:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:social_facility for a better description of your business.

If you need help: You are welcome.
multimodaal (2017-12-03 13:49:56+00:00): Beste Leo, 
weet je misschien of dit knooppunt 18 (wat voorheen als 98 in de database stond) ook linkt heeft naar dit punt 2,5 km in het noordoosten ?  http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4015365163#map=15/52.0427/4.8178

Er zouden 3 verbindingen moeten aankomen (expected rwn relations), maar nu zijn het er maar twee.  Wandelen123 (Wandelnet, we hebben toestemming om die te gebruiken) vermeldt daar in het  noordoosten ook een knooppunt (nr 49), maar kennelijk zaten ze er ook naast met het nummer van nr 18 (ik neem aan dat je daar zelf bent geweest?)

Op Mapillary kom ik er echter zo snel niet uit (en ik kan nu ook niet even gaan kijken ;-)

Bij  KNP18/98: 
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Bk5r3GoCRffX54YZsMjJYQ

Bij KNP "49":
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Flc3wll6GY47UIt0b_wCAw

Als er inderdaad een RWN-verbinding is, dan voeg ik die graag toe, maar de situatie in het veld blijft natuurlijk leidend. Dank voor je hulp!
Leo Slager (2017-12-03 15:14:45+00:00): Beste multimodaal,
Na raadpleging van osma.vmarc zat ik met dezelfde vragen. Ik heb het voornemen om deze week die hele route ter plaatse te gaan bekijken.
Wordt vervolgd.
SomeoneElse (2017-11-16 10:54:21+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap,
You've tagged http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/537394875/history with a name of "non exsist boundary".  Is this country boundary not in the correct place, and if not where should it be?
Best Regards,
Andy
WalkerB (2017-11-16 13:34:07+00:00): Hey Zahid!  Thanks for fixing the Road.  In your comments, instead of just saying NRAP.  Could you put in what you changed?  For example: Added and corrected road locations, updated attributes using MPW/MRRD NRAP Program.  things like that.
bubix (2017-11-15 08:00:10+00:00): MI sono permesso di modificare il tuo tag in quanto nel testo della modifica ti riferivi a attacco di mandata per autopompa. Il tag suction point non è corretto per un attacco di mandata . Ho inserito il seguente tag che se anche non ancora approvato è più corretto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dry_riser_inlet

Ciao,
Bubix
Warin61 (2017-11-25 20:53:18+00:00): HI,
Welcome to OSM. 

The way 540628661 tagged 'landuse=residential' has some problems.
First I cannot see it with the source you have of LIP Imagery .. but it does show up with bing - so I'll add the source tag to the way 540628661 - that will make it clear to anyone else who comes along. Err .. you could have used the LPI Base Map .. and that is probably a better source! 
Next .. the way crosses it self .. this is not good as it is confusing for the computer to work out what is inside and what is outside. With residential areas OSM accepts that small parks etc can be included in the residential area. So easier to just not include them into OSM residential areas. Makes it simple for us to map. 

I have changed this to what I think is a little better. 
Take a look and see what you think. 
OK?
iWowik (2017-11-18 20:15:14+00:00): День добрый!
Прочтите наконец документацию о формате заполнения addr:housenumber
постепенно накапливается желание не исправлять за вами номера типа "6а", а откатывать ваши правки разом.

Исправьте, пожалуйста за собой.
mapper999 (2019-02-16 08:43:11+00:00): Hallo Nationalpark Schwarzwald,
dieser Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540632734) wurde von euch als gesperrt eingetragen, weiterhin führt aber die Gaiskopfspur über diesen Weg  und der Weg wurde von BastiaanH wieder für Fußgänger freigegeben.
Wie sind die aktuellen Beschränkungen für diesen Weg? Führt die Loipe tatsächlich über diesen Weg? Außerdem bitte prüfen ob Anfang und Ende der Beschränkungen korrekt sind, ich vermute das der Zugang zur Darmstädter Hütte und zu dem Weg südlich weiterhin möglich sind?
NationalparkSchwarzwald (2019-02-18 10:39:21+00:00): Hallo mapper999
die Loipe führt tatsächlich über diesen Weg. Da er aber größtenteils außerhalb Nationalparkfläche ist habe ich einfach den access no rausgenommen.
andi9876 (2017-11-20 01:17:12+00:00): Dear, no viewpoints there!
andi9876 (2017-11-20 01:17:33+00:00): Dear, no viewpoints there!
GerdP (2017-11-16 08:05:01+00:00): Hi!
Please review highway="residential;unclassified" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191201005
It seems that the app GoMap! creates such wrong data ?
zwaygp (2017-11-21 14:08:19+00:00): Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I have gone back and changed it.
Paul Berry (2017-11-20 08:18:33+00:00): A big thank you for tidying up the stands at the bus station - they were a bit messy before and I'd been meaning to fix them for ages.
sander79 (2018-05-31 07:34:57+00:00): Hoi jeij,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/540638186#map=19/52.08579/5.11804
Je hebt dit fietspad toegevoegd. Is dit pas geleden toegevoegd want op mapillary zie ik niets
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.085221493665244&lng=5.118581838910586&z=18.56512268465166&focus=photo&signs=true&pKey=8FbctN4EgmZWz0z0AqHC3Q&line=true&ocr=true&x=0.431956119363332&y=0.5755366427824332&zoom=0.6629834254143646

gr,
Sander
jeij (2018-05-31 08:55:36+00:00): Yes, zie https://www.duic.nl/algemeen/eindelijk-rechtdoor-fietsen-op-de-catharijnesingel/. Verandert snel dit gebied.
sander79 (2018-05-31 09:09:59+00:00): Dan kan ik niets anders zeggen dan: goed bezig :)
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-15 20:44:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53818827 where the changeset comment is: revert graffitti added under the guise of #hotosm-project-3839 #ghana #missingmaps #mapforpreparedness #climatecentre
GerdP (2017-11-16 08:15:10+00:00): Hi!
I've changed highway=residential_link to secondary_link + oneway=yes, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53832589
Please use only those _link values listed in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway#Link_roads
See also http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/highway-residential-link-td5859566.html
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-15 20:44:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53818827 where the changeset comment is: revert graffitti added under the guise of #hotosm-project-3839 #ghana #missingmaps #mapforpreparedness #climatecentre
majid1359 (2017-11-15 09:10:44+00:00): اینترنت شاتل اصلاح شد
majid1359 (2017-11-15 09:12:44+00:00): تغییرات انجام شد
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-15 20:44:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53818827 where the changeset comment is: revert graffitti added under the guise of #hotosm-project-3839 #ghana #missingmaps #mapforpreparedness #climatecentre
Volker Fröhlich (2017-12-04 22:15:13+00:00): Der Penny in Eggendorf gehört ins frühere Billagebäude südlich der Ortsstraße. Die Hausnummer 18 stimmt nicht, wie ich meine.
Luzandro (2019-04-19 17:09:10+00:00): Ich habe die Position korrigiert und entsprechend die Hausnummer auf 5 geändert. Die Adresse ist etwas eigenartig, denn auf penny.at wird es zwar an dieser Position, aber mit Hausnummer 18 angegeben, was schon alleine von der Straßenseite her eigentlich keinen Sinn ergibt?
majid1359 (2017-11-15 09:14:13+00:00): تغییرات انجام شد
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-15 20:44:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53818827 where the changeset comment is: revert graffitti added under the guise of #hotosm-project-3839 #ghana #missingmaps #mapforpreparedness #climatecentre
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-15 20:44:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53818827 where the changeset comment is: revert graffitti added under the guise of #hotosm-project-3839 #ghana #missingmaps #mapforpreparedness #climatecentre
PT-53 (2017-11-15 15:06:42+00:00): Hallo Cherub,
bei einem Tor sollte man immer auch die Nutzungsberechtigung angeben, übereinstimmend mit der Nutzungsberechtigung am Weg.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dgate
access: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:barrier%3Dgate
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-11-15 15:12:14+00:00): Ist in dem Gebäude nur diese Praxis untergebracht oder wird das Gebäude auch anderweitig genutzt, z.B. zu Wohnzwecken?
Wenn verschiedene Verwendungen vorliegen, wäre es besser die Daten der Praxis nicht am Gebäudeumriß einzutragen, sondern - innerhalb des Gebäudes - einen neuen separaten Node zu erstellen und dort die Daten einzutragen.
Grüße
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-15 20:44:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53818827 where the changeset comment is: revert graffitti added under the guise of #hotosm-project-3839 #ghana #missingmaps #mapforpreparedness #climatecentre
lleung (2017-11-16 04:21:56+00:00): 孙中山像不应该设置 amenity=place_of_worship，这个tag是用于宗教场所的，例如寺庙、教堂等，参见：
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship

对于户外雕塑，应该使用 tourism=artwork 和 artwork_type=sculpture
ForstEK (2017-11-20 11:23:45+00:00): Привет! Не забывай улицу проставлять, когда адреса отмечаешь, а то от таких адресов толку мало - навигатор их не увидит. Подправил за тобой: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/277414365/history
dima100 (2017-11-20 13:32:13+00:00): Привет! Ну очевидно же, что я просто ошибся. Подправил и подправил, молодец...
zvenzzon (2017-11-15 10:30:41+00:00): Welcome to openstreetmap! Please consider a better changeset comment where your intention is clearly stated.
Reitstoen (2017-11-15 10:57:20+00:00): Many nodes were moved all over the place. Reverted changeset.
Supaplex (2018-01-21 05:10:49+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
eggie (2017-11-15 13:35:58+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM


Beste Hanit, Je veranderde drie adressen zoals deze bij het Kadaster bekend zijn. Wat is daarvan de reden?
eggie (2017-11-15 13:49:49+00:00): Ik heb de edits teruggedraaid, want anders komt nr 17 2x voor en is 51 verdwenen uit de data van OSM.
eggie (2017-11-15 13:52:04+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3041448805
zit gewoon hier in de data.
Liever geen adressen veranderen svp.
wambacher (2017-11-16 19:49:41+00:00): Hi Susana,

something is going completely wrong. Those place areas are NO MEMBERS of the El Libertador relation. They are only simple closed lines.

i had to fix a lot of those dubious "constructions" in Argentina during the last weeks. Please stop that.

If you got questions, please contact me.

Regards
walter, Germany
wambacher (2017-11-16 19:49:54+00:00): cs: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53853453
majid1359 (2017-11-15 11:51:47+00:00): دفتر پیشخوان خدمات دولتی و عمومی صیاد نیک و شرکت خدمات اینترنتیADSl  شاتل تصحیح شد و اضافه گردد در osm
user_6820707 (2017-11-15 17:47:20+00:00): Thank you for your letter. Under your criticism, I know my mistake. My English study is not very good。 The place I edit is what I know. Real existence. I won't edit my strange place. In some places, I found the original editor was wrong, so I made adjustments and supplements. After reading your letter, I decided to delete some of the places I edited, and re locate with GPS. I'm sorry
tux67 (2017-11-23 12:49:20+00:00): Hi pili-pili,

hat es einen bestimmten Grund, warum du die Kreuzkirche in Wassenberg gelöscht hast?
http://www.ev-kirche-wassenberg.de/
http://www.limburg-bernd.de/Kirchen%20und%20Kapellen%20im%20Kreis%20Heinsberg/Bilder%20Wassenberg/Wassenberg%20Evang.%20Kreuzkirche.htm
http://www.kkrjuelich.de/index.php?id=99
Ist die Kirche nicht mehr aktiv genutzt?

Gruß
Stephan (tux67)
tux67 (2017-11-23 12:52:38+00:00): ok, ich hätte mal besser hinsehen sollen .. scheint als hättest du einen doppelten POI gelöscht und die Daten der Kirche sind noch am Gebäude. 
Entschuldige den unnötigen Einwand.

Gruß
tux67
lkw (2017-12-09 17:45:59+00:00):  Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap Yori17,

bitte achte bei weiteren Änderungen darauf, dass sie mit der Realität übereinstimmen. Der Goldene Stör und der Geranienpark in Annerod existieren nämlich zum Beispiel nicht. Weitere Informationen: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice 

Ich werde die Fehler korrigieren.
eggie (2017-12-21 10:42:22+00:00): alsnog Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
olo81 (2021-01-01 01:15:57+00:00): błąd, nazwa własna https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219340600
odpowiednie tagi wskazują że to są garaże
C2oc4 (2021-01-01 10:08:50+00:00): Sorki za to. Stara zmiana. Będę widział w przyszłości takie zmiany to zmienię. Najlepszego w nowym roku.
eggie (2017-11-15 13:53:27+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-11-15 13:59:56+00:00): Dit is volgen mij niet helemaal goed gegaan. Je verwijderd de adresnodes en voegt op één adresnode alle nummers toe. Waarom is even de vraag. Meestal zitten de gezochte adresnodes verborgen en liggen gewoon allemaal op een punt.
Graag reactie
eggie (2017-11-15 14:18:33+00:00): Deze kon ik niet terugdraaien wegens een conflict.
Hier
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=middachtenstraat%20179&resultOffset=0&objectId=0268100000007207&geometry.x=185010.08740052&geometry.y=423764.0435982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=

De kadastergegevens om e.e.a. te herstellen. Doe je dit zelf? Leuk puzzeltje.
eggie (2017-11-15 14:32:36+00:00): De adresnodes heb ik al hersteld volgens het Kadaster. Kijk in de Wifi welke tag erbij kan voor de Katten oppas. Wellicht staat  er iets bij.
eggie (2017-11-15 14:33:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=Kattenoppas%20Nijmegen#map=19/51.80173/5.82235
Staat in de data..
santamariense (2017-11-15 16:13:26+00:00): De onde você tem copiado nomes de ruas?
Robert2017 (2017-11-16 10:06:23+00:00): A unica que realmente copiei foi a mensionada pois nao lembrava o nome correto dela, eu ando por toda a cidade, inclusive se for ver os nomes do google maps com os que eu coloquei tem nomes diferentes que no google estao errados
naoliv (2017-11-16 13:03:03+00:00): Oi, Robert.
Alguns nomes, infelizmente, estão iguais ao Google.
Por exemplo, o nome que você inseriu como "Rua Maestro Gerem Rocato" só existe dessa forma no mapa do Google.
No mapa do IBGE está com o nome de "Rua Maestro Geremias Roncatto", que inclusive é utilizado pela própria prefeitura, como podemos ver em https://www.facebook.com/PMVeraCity/posts/1712612645447275
Você pode continuar contribuindo desde que utilize conhecimento pessoal ou mapas que possuímos direito de uso.
Não podemos utilizar o Google ou outro mapa comercial mesmo que seja apenas para "dar uma conferida no nome".
No editor que você utiliza basta clicar em "Plano de fundo" e escolher "IBGE Mapa de Setores Urbanos" para consultar os nomes que o IBGE utiliza. Este mapa podemos utilizar para consultas e inclusive copiar os nomes, já que temos permissão para isso.
Contamos com a sua compreensão e esperamos que continue colaborando com o OpenStreetMap.
GerdP (2017-11-16 08:17:57+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I changed the unusual highway=service_road to service here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53832667
See also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
portolan (2017-11-19 17:25:27+00:00): Thanks, I think I was meant to use service=driveway; highway=service there.
GerdP (2017-11-19 18:50:27+00:00): Well, many roads in this area are tagged like that, but I think that these tags imply access=private, as service=driveway normally leads to a single building. Maybe service=alley matches, maybe highway=living_street or just the usual highway=residential.
eggie (2017-11-15 14:08:07+00:00): Hier het zelfde bezwaar. De nummering klopt niet meer.
eggie (2017-11-15 14:16:04+00:00): reverted
Stereo (2017-11-27 19:50:51+00:00): Je ne comprends pas "leave this node disconnected, the unstraightened area routing may mislead people", c'est un bug dans les routeurs?
SHARCRASH (2017-11-27 20:48:06+00:00): Le périmètre des highway areas, parkings par exemple... sontutilisés pour le routing des directions de chemin. Si ces areas là sont collés à des batiments qui ont des formes géométriques complexes, le routing suivra la géométrie complexe, ce qui peut dérouter l'utilisateur d'un service comme Graphhopper, par exemple. Il vaut mieux donc éviter de connecter ces aréas là à d'autres simples ways pour que le routing ne soit pas pris en compte et utiliser une way dédié qui traversa la zone tout droit. Voici ce que ça donne en suivant ma technique, le chemin reste droit :  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.60897%2C6.13150%3B49.61145%2C6.13253#map=18/49.61029/6.13209

Je viens de trouver un node connecté qui permet à un routing de suivre le périmètre sur un chemin de navigation, heureusement il n'est pas trop diforme dans tous les sens:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.61047%2C6.12977%3B49.61104%2C6.13238#map=18/49.61069/6.13121

Voici un autre exemple qui utilise le routing du périmètre qui est collé au bâtiment avec une forme complexe, la navigation s'en trouve déformée et encore peut dérouter:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.75385%2C6.63648%3B49.75369%2C6.63864#map=18/49.75369/6.63767
Ca peut être encore pire selon la forme de l'area.

Voilà pourquoi.
SHARCRASH (2017-11-27 20:55:05+00:00): Voici ce que ca devrait donner avec un mapping clean (node déconnecté) par rapport au 2e exemple que j'ai donné sur mon comentaire précédent: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.61047%2C6.12977%3B49.61107%2C6.13244#map=18/49.61078/6.13113

C'est quand même mieux. Ici je ne l'ai pas déconnecté, c'est juste la position de la destination qui se trouve plus proche du way dédié.
SHARCRASH (2017-11-27 21:00:31+00:00): Un exemple bien pourri: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=49.75837%2C6.64179%3B49.75851%2C6.63974#map=19/49.75843/6.64076
Peilscheibe (2017-12-21 16:34:34+00:00): please see my comments in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53768737
user_5359 (2017-11-15 19:05:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare for a possible better description of your business.
trial (2017-11-24 19:31:14+00:00): Bonjour, plusieurs pb sur le noeud ambassade de Bretagne :
- point en doublon (par l'auteur initial)
- le nom mérite une majuscule (comme le doublon !)
- une cuisine bretonne à Marseille n'est pas une cuisine régionale.
cuisine=crepe serait mieux