piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dooley (2016-12-05 09:25:13+00:00): Bei den von dir zugefügten addr:postcode hat sich wahrscheinlich ein Tippfehler eingeschlichen, 41779 soll sicherlich 41179 sein? Insgesamt müssten es sich um ca. 190 Adressen handeln.
mueschel (2016-12-06 11:33:09+00:00): Hi,
I found three trees with strange tags:
  diameter_crown = width: 4.0; color: green;
  thuja = occidentalis
Could you check these?

Cheers, Jan
pezza10 (2016-12-20 15:40:38+00:00): First of all I apologize myself but can I ask who you are?
and second why are strange tags?,which one of them?
mueschel (2016-12-27 21:50:26+00:00): I'm just another OSM mapper...

How can a 'diameter' be 'green'?
'thuja occidentalis' can be the species, but 'thuja' is not a recognized tag.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 22:26:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44434250 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44162500 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 22:11:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44434087 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44162652 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 22:01:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433997 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44162865 because there was a problem with licence of data use
adrianojbr (2017-04-09 14:16:32+00:00): vitor, sei que já faz um tempo que você não mapeia, mas quando resolver voltar, evite apagar elementos para recriá-los, pois isso faz perder o histórico dos elementos do mapa.

em caibi, você apagou todas as vias para poder criá-las depois em vias duplicadas, deixando inclusive alguns problemas no mapa, que não haviam antes, e precisaram ser corrigidos por outros mapeadores.

sempre há uma maneira de aproveitar o que já está mapeado e existe. corrigindo. só apague algo quando realmente não representar mais nada no mundo real.

abraço.
user_5359 (2016-12-06 18:29:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Barn isn’t a name, barn is a description. I move this to the value of the key building.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-04 20:25:20+00:00): Hi l8ghtofheaven, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways and buildings in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44163602
l8ghtofheaven (2016-12-06 15:45:27+00:00): Hi pitscheplatsch, in fact all action taken by China on Paracel Islands and Spratly Islands is illegal. They have been building airport, houses and military office on these islands which belong to Vietnam, parallel with expanding military force in South China Sea. Although it is called South China Sea, only a north part of it belong to China, not all of it. Therefore I believe that I am as a VIetnamese citizen will not accept this. Before they use their passport with the wrong map, we dont accept it. Doing some research I know that now facebook use openstreetmap as their map service, if users use it for a long time China will say we accept it as a fact but we will ever never accept this.
l8ghtofheaven (2016-12-06 15:48:05+00:00): In Google map they already changed the name to Paracel Islands and Spratly Islands. I can see that the chinese letter means China and Sansha City is really a big joke, we are small country but we are not stupid.
FTA (2016-12-07 02:43:05+00:00): Hi l8ghtofheaven, generally in OpenStreetMap we follow a policy of representing de facto borders in the case of the South China Sea because of the disputes that are occurring by multiple countries. Usually that choice stems from the on the ground situation. This document http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf provides you with some more information about disputed regions. There are many tags throughout this region that indicate islands are disputed. If you are interested in changing tags on some of these islands, I encourage you to first start a discussion with the community through changeset comments. Also, the great thing about OSM is that it's freely downloadable. This allows you to download the data and modify it as you'd like for your own use on personal websites.
FreedSky (2016-12-10 14:01:55+00:00): OSM表示的是客观的事实，你不接受请你过去占领啊！不要破坏。
OSM is an objective fact that you do not accept your occupation in the past ah! Do not destroy.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-04 20:24:32+00:00): Hi l8ghtofheaven, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways and buildings in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44163750
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-12-11 16:26:15+00:00): Olá Vitor, muito bom suas contribuições, mas tem um erro que vc comete sempre, por exemplo nessa rua: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457732074/history vc passa em cima dessa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/412462727/history
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-12-11 16:27:17+00:00): Eu já estou corrigindo, mas por favor não faça assim pq dá um trabalhao corrigir.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-04 20:22:12+00:00): Hi l8ghtofheaven, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways and buildings in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44164108
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-04 20:21:53+00:00): Hi l8ghtofheaven, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways and buildings in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44164138
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-04 20:21:00+00:00): Hi l8ghtofheaven, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways and pois in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44164158
freebeer (2018-06-05 17:17:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59575798 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam
aceman444 (2016-12-18 22:56:01+00:00): Dakujem, za navratenie building=yes na tie palace. Ale historic=palace ste mohli ponechat. Teraz building=*+castle_type=* nema velky zmysel.
gendy54 (2016-12-17 01:38:22+00:00): J'allais remettre ce nom de voie avant de voir que tu l'avais supprimé. Qu'en est-il?
py_berrard (2016-12-17 09:20:23+00:00): quel voie ?
gendy54 (2016-12-17 09:25:23+00:00): Rue Marcelle Dorr dans le prolongement du quai Ligier Richier.
py_berrard (2016-12-17 09:34:34+00:00): J'ai considéré que la voie était devenue privée mais peut-être le nom subsiste. Regarde les photos que j'ai prises en venant de la rue Thierry-Solet. Tu peux les ouvrir dans JOSM.

https://framapic.org/gallery#mV4lwLBV66VM/KGWcfIbX8HEr.JPG,csftuM3yVTHG/llOODgQQzrLp.JPG,zXwpvkx4WTgL/Q9eGXY62XSoo.JPG
gendy54 (2016-12-18 14:57:36+00:00): C'est une bonne question... Je te propose en mettre le name en alt_name. Comme ca on ne perd pas l'info.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:55:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433868 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44164234 because there was a problem with licence of data use
GerdP (2017-09-20 14:10:01+00:00): Hi!
Please review the position of the rails at this node:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2365711704
Hjart (2016-12-04 20:12:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/121793917 = restaurant / cafe ?
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2016-12-05 01:03:27+00:00): restaurant, tak
SomeoneElse (2017-01-04 22:03:35+00:00): Hello doledechu
Your source tag here says "Bing, Google street view".  We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to stop doing this immediately. 
We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will go through your changes and will need to remove data that's been added from Google. This may take some time, but please do be aware that features that you have added from Google will disappear.
If you have any questions you can reply here, or you can email the Data Working Group on data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-01-12 23:30:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45120166 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Street View tracing usage
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:49:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433841 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44164658 because there was a problem with licence of data use
marc__marc (2024-08-14 09:14:22+00:00): Bonjour,
que veux dire 
source=arial Bing survey 04-12-16 ?
est-ce que arial est une erreur pour aerial ? et si oui est-ce que cela signifie source=aerial imagery imagery_used=Bing 2016 ?
Cordialement,
Marc
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-04 20:34:05+00:00): Hi l8ghtofheaven, welcome to the OpenStreetMap project. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways and buildings in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44164874
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433787 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44164983 because there was a problem with licence of data use
Hjart (2016-12-04 20:10:38+00:00): -> dobbelt navn
FTA (2016-12-04 23:38:36+00:00): Hello there. Please stop mass-deleting things without explanation. If you are interested in adding country-specific names to these disputed regions or commenting on a particular edit, that is fine. But deleting things without any discussion is not helpful to creating dialogue and doesn't let other mappers know why you are doing so. So, if you believe they should not have been added for some reason, then comment on the changeset to attempt starting a discussion. I will be going through edits in this region as well to make sure unauthorized sources aren't being used.
Happy Mapping,
Ethan aka FTA with the OSM Data Working Group

dịch tự động

Hi, xin vui lòng dừng hàng loạt xóa những thứ mà không giải thích. Nếu bạn quan tâm trong việc thêm tên quốc gia cụ thể để các khu vực tranh chấp hoặc cho ý kiến về chỉnh sửa cụ thể, đó là tốt. Nhưng xóa những thứ mà không cần bất kỳ cuộc thảo luận không phải là hữu ích để tạo ra đối thoại và không cho phép vẽ bản đồ khác biết lý do tại sao bạn đang làm như vậy. Vì vậy, nếu bạn tin rằng họ không nên được thêm vào cho một số lý do, sau đó nhận xét về các changeset để cố gắng bắt đầu một cuộc thảo luận. Tôi sẽ được đi qua các chỉnh sửa trong khu vực này cũng như để đảm bảo nguồn trái phép không được sử dụng.
Chúc mừng Mapping,
Ethan aka FTA với Nhóm Công tác dữ liệu OSM
FreedSky (2016-12-10 14:05:10+00:00): 狼狈为奸吗？ 退回我的编辑你有没有注意过我吧越南实际控制的地方添加了越南的relation去掉了菲律宾的？
Peter Bremer (2018-01-13 00:46:55+00:00): Isn't "Les Trois Vallées" (way 297894486) the same feature as "Les 3 Vallées" (way 45117869)?
SomeoneElse (2016-12-25 23:30:52+00:00): Hello,

You appear to have used "google.cn" imagery in iD in this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details). 
We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will look at these changes and will need to remove data that's been added from Google. This may take some time, but please do be aware that features that you have added from Google will disappear.

If you have any questions please email the Data Working Group on data@osmfoundation.org .

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-25 23:36:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44672115 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
jaap de vries (2016-12-13 07:31:31+00:00): Beste John,

Ik zie dat je bij Puur koffie hebt bijgewerkt.
Ik zie dat ze een keuken hebben met Braziliaans en Arabische eten. Dit lijkt mij heel onwaarschijnlijk voor een koffiebar. 
Haal je dit even weg?
Ik ontvang graag een reactie van je wanneer je dit hebt gedaan.
jaap de vries (2016-12-13 07:47:01+00:00): Ik zie dat je bij intertoys een mobile website gebruikt, dit moet natuurlijk de originele website zijn. Ook moet de poi een naam bevatten, zet je dit er nog in?
alphensebezorger (2016-12-13 19:16:15+00:00): De naam is toch gewoon Intertoys, zoals in name=Intertoys. Die staat er al bij. Of bedoel je iets anders?
jaap de vries (2016-12-13 19:57:32+00:00): Nu staat er een mobiele website , dus niet de originele website graag aanpassen en er staat alleen een poi speelgoed ( met een hobbelpaard) maar die is niet benoemd. Het zijn kleine dingetjes, ik kan het ook doen maar wellicht leert John er van.
alphensebezorger (2016-12-13 20:44:32+00:00): Akkoord wat betreft de website.
De naam staat wel gewoon in de data vermeld. John kan het toch ook niet helpen dat de standaard kaart op osm.org die niet tussen Huiskes mode en The Read Shop ingefrommeld krijgt.
kayle (2016-12-05 05:51:41+00:00): Ahoj, vďaka za vylepšovanie mapy. Len by som dodal, že by bolo dobré označiť čísla domov nasledovným spôsobom
http://wiki.freemap.sk/cislabudov
Je to tzv. "český systém" http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:WikiProject_Czech_Republic/Address_system
trigpoint (2016-12-04 23:12:47+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Thank you for your edit, however Tesco Express is already mapped, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223063426. 
Tesco Express is normally mapped as shop=convienience, supermarket is used for larger shops.
I have removed the duplicate.
geow (2016-12-11 19:24:43+00:00): Hi jklippel, dieses Gebäude ist schon lange abgerissen und existiert nur noch auf den veralteten Bing-Luftbildern (2012). 
Für Bayern ist es empfehlenswerter die aktuellen (hier von 2015) DOP der offiziellen Vermessungsverwaltung zu verwenden. Sie sind in JOSM und iD als  Hintergrund unter dem Namen "Bayern bzw. Bavaria 80 cm"verfügbar.
 Statt das Gebäude jetzt zu löschen, könntest du es vorerst als "removed:building=yes" taggen, siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Es wird dann nicht gerendert und die Gefahr, dass ein anderer Mapper das Gebäude noch mal auf Basis der veralteten Bing-Bilder einträgt, ist deutlich geringer.
Danke, geow
jklippel (2016-12-13 15:55:16+00:00): Hallo geow,

Du hast natürlich zu 100% recht. Habe die Änderungen in Changeset 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44375175

vorgenommen.

Danke für den Hinweis, jklippel
geow (2016-12-14 20:31:10+00:00): Super - danke für die schnelle Reaktion :-)
jaap de vries (2016-12-13 07:51:11+00:00): Bij het zwembad hoef je maar 1x de naam in te vullen. Als er ook een Engelse naam bekend is bv swimingpool great splash dan vul je die in. 
Verwijder je de tags, name_nl en name_eng? 
Dit geldt ook voor al je andere bewerkingen!!
marczoutendijk (2016-12-14 19:11:19+00:00): Ik heb John de Beijer 10 dagen geleden al een uitgebreide mail gestuurd n.a.v. zijn edits, maar hij reageerde in het geheel niet.
Ook is hij nog steeds bezig met spaties in postcodes waar ze niet horen.
Het prototype van een maps.me gebruiker vrees ik....
OMNIBUS (2017-01-06 01:46:07+00:00): Se revirtió la edición
mariotomo (2023-08-28 15:47:01+00:00): hi. I'm reading your commentary to your own changeset and I'm left wondering. what do you refer to? I see no part of this changeset that was reverted around your comment @ 2017-01-06.

I do see some nodes with descriptive names and tags that would better be associated with areas. maybe you're still around to review them?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4538509069
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4538514519

thanks, and thanks for being part of OSM.
Carnildo (2016-12-04 23:02:45+00:00): I've partially reverted this changeset.  The Bing imagery for Sprague is out of date -- the intersection at the northwest corner of the town has been re-worked into a conventional four-way intersection with a driveway coming out of it.
Chetan_Gowda (2016-12-06 06:27:25+00:00): Hi ErlynMedalle, Glad to know that you are contributing to OpenStreetMap. Project NOAH is great and shaping very neatly. In this changeset, you have added "building=yes" tag to all the features of OpenStreetMap. Can you take few minutes to delete all unnecessary nodes.
Thank you,
Chetan
alejandroscf (2016-12-16 18:49:13+00:00): Hola!

Ojo con esos barrier, si son muros van con barrier=wall y si son vallas, pues mejor poner el fence_type también ;)

Salud!
Alejandroscf
user_5359 (2016-12-06 18:21:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I didn’t see your disconnect highways on the aerial amages. I have deleted your entry.
GerdP (2017-08-31 06:35:35+00:00): Hi!
Please review unusual tagging  highway=closed:service
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453560865
Did you mean disused:highway=service?
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
Gazer75 (2016-12-08 11:36:40+00:00): Vaskehallen er ikkje teikna inn på kartet. Det du markerte som vaskehall her faktisk taket på truck diesel pumpene :)
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2017-07-24 19:02:45+00:00): Gammel Skovridervej:
Enten skal contruction=yes slettes
eller også skal den tagges
highway=contruction,construction=unclassified
trigpoint (2016-12-04 23:54:43+00:00): Hi, do you have any more detail for this hotel, such as a phone number. Also please could you capitalise names properly, all lowercase means others will have to clean up.
andrewpmk (2016-12-05 00:02:29+00:00): You do not need to add is_in for minor features like street lamps
pyrog (2019-11-12 09:48:12+00:00): Hi,

For Lowman Building (Way: 184253480), you could use wikimedia_commons=Category:Lowman Building to show current and past pictures.

So you could avoid unusable keys such image:old or image:flickr.

To link to a Flickr image, please use flickr=http://www.flickr.com/photos/70442209@N00/8251083193

Best regards
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-12-04 23:54:41+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44163283, 44163308, 44163323, 44163337, 44163346, 44163602, 44163750, 44163855, 44163875, 44164108, 44164138, 44164158, 44164187, 44164874, 44164966, 44165019, 44165069, 44165179, 44165219, 44165236, 44165274.
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-12-04 23:59:33+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44051341, 44051371, 44053602, 44055802, 44060459, 44060829, 44061722, 44073371, 44075038, 44075694, 44076925, 44076940, 44076950, 44096469, 44099089, 44103970.
ElliottPlack (2016-12-05 22:47:18+00:00): Source is the comment and my own observation :)
GOwin (2016-12-05 09:53:29+00:00): Good work @Jneil02! Keep it up.
AgusQui (2016-12-08 15:41:23+00:00): Reverti este cambio, aqui no hay parada, cualquier cosa avisame.
Zverik (2016-12-05 10:24:46+00:00): Hi, you have broken the coastline again in this changeset. Exactly the same way as before. I again have fixed it, but please be careful.

I'd recommend using JOSM editor, which gives a warning when you break something.
Sosha1996 (2019-04-24 13:56:21+00:00): im sorry and thanks.
Alexey Lukin (2016-12-19 02:48:49+00:00): This changeset breaks continuity of many roads and moves the Red Line away from its accurate track alignment. A clear mistake that has to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 01:40:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 01:39:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
FTA (2016-12-05 03:52:35+00:00): This is part one of reversions for edits within the SCS that modified boundaries.
FreedSky (2016-12-10 12:48:29+00:00): 别辩解了 各种破坏你好意思！
Do not justify a variety of damage you have the nerve!
FreedSky (2016-12-10 13:14:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6755267/history 破坏
katpatuka (2016-12-10 15:11:43+00:00): Could you please explain a bit more in detail to FreedSky why you reverted his edits?!
FTA (2016-12-10 16:19:57+00:00): Hi katpatuka,
I have communicated with FreedSky through email about the situation, but the set of edits in this area were reverted because OSM follows de facto borders in the Spratly Island area, leaving them how they are. This area is the source of numerous claim disputes for land by multiple countries, and there is currently no way to represent that matter through the tagging schema, so they are left to that and include a tag or note that they are disputed.
user_5359 (2016-12-06 17:57:17+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dtax_advisor, too.
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-12-05 04:47:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44075530, 44077784, 44079017, 44079574, 44079937, 44079969, 44079982, 44080102, 44080126, 44081061, 44081089, 44081134, 44081273, 44081462, 44082997, 44083030, 44083379, 44083405, 44083459, 44083619, 44083656, 44083672, 44083762, 44083795, 44083876, 44083919, 44083964, 44083993, 44084040, 44084072, 44084117, 44084177, 44084197, 44084224, 44084255, 44084307, 44084357, 44084432, 44084521, 44086327, 44086376, 44086423, 44086481, 44086514, 44086538, 44086559, 44086645, 44086675, 44086706, 44102216, 44102239, 44102532, 44102584, 44102618, 44102626, 44102692, 44102697, 44102709, 44102722, 44102731, 44102759, 44102811, 44102824, 44102835, 44102861, 44102874, 44102878, 44102945, 44103014, 44103055, 44103083, 44103108, 44103202, 44103232, 44103243, 44103310, 44103324, 44103350, 44103398, 44103488, 44103523, 44103538, 44103579, 44103590, 44103754, 44103870, 44103895, 44103937, 44103968, 44103997, 44104012, 44104068, 44104149, 44104168, 44104184, 44104203, 44104343, 44104718, 44105696, 44138060, 44138103, 44138132, 44138174, 44138256, 44138272, 44138343, 44138356, 44149634.
GOwin (2016-12-05 07:44:11+00:00): good work. please don't forget to digitize all  features inside a grid, and to square / orthagonalize buildings, before hitting the "Mark as Done" button. If it's not complete, select, "Stop Mapping" instead.
ridixcr (2016-12-12 18:50:51+00:00): Margonotmango you can specify why you added such amount of routes in a relationship with the unique tag type = lanalet this change is generated several errors.
margonotmango (2016-12-14 07:39:11+00:00): Please check this https://github.com/phbender/liblanelet. 
But now I'm trying to revert changeset. 
I'm so sorry.
Alexey Lukin (2016-12-19 03:03:06+00:00): Many roads in Cambridge, MA, have become disconnected after these changes. The Red Line has also shifted away from its accurate track alignment established in a changeset 31029556.
Can someone please cleanup this mess?
user_5359 (2016-12-06 17:55:15+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Aleks-Berlin (2016-12-06 18:46:09+00:00): please follow the guidelines from
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
wikipedia="lang:Article Name" e.g. "en:Name".
Thanks a lot, Alexander
pdxrider (2016-12-07 05:19:28+00:00): totally knew that, JOSM editing makes me forget about the language prefix. thanks for letting me know.
user_5359 (2016-12-06 15:05:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359