piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2017-05-15 08:39:45+00:00): Skulle "Primitiv legeplads" (playground) have været "Primitiv lejrplads" (camp site)?
Dige (2017-05-19 09:11:09+00:00): Nej det er en primitiv skovlegeplads. Ikke i så go stand mere. Der må ikke overnattes.
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-14 04:08:58+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151515618 being built? Imagery doesn't show anything
MrManny (2019-02-13 11:56:20+00:00): Vielleicht bin ich ein bisserl spät mit der Frage dran, aber ich hab gesehen, dass in diesem Changeset die Pedestrian Street beim Heuplatz zu "Paul-Hatheyer-Schütt" umbenannt wurde. Außerhalb von Webseiten, die Daten aus OSM beziehen, finde ich aber dazu keine weiteren Referenzen. Der KAGIS schweigt sich hier auch ein bisserl aus.
Ist das eine informelle Bezeichnung?
MrManny (2019-02-13 11:57:19+00:00): Addendum: ich meine hier konkret https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/69950326
osmidal (2025-05-16 21:58:34+00:00): This changeset introduced a `fence_type=hedge`, which should be corrected according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge#Possible_Tagging_Mistake.

Regards!
ulmtuelp (2025-05-21 12:22:21+00:00): Hi osmidal, please feel free to change fence-type to barrier. Thanks in advance Ulmtuelp
osmidal (2025-05-21 18:22:21+00:00): Fixed.
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-09-03 06:57:52+00:00): Hi LTKA,
I added a bridge on this road (way151691589) because it crossed with waterway. Thank you
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2021-05-06 03:28:55+00:00): hi Paul_012,
I found the waterbody https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/151750344 already a building in all imagery (Maxar, Bing, Ersi, and Mapbox), so I've changed it to be building area. 
thank you
Linus W Frische (2025-04-19 14:21:55+00:00): Du har tilføjet en masse hegn uden at angive hverken kommentar eller kilde. Tilmed er det let at se, at mange af hegnene er hække, når man kigger fra luftfoto.

Er det med vilje at de alle er tilføjet som hegn?
osmviborg (2025-04-19 16:40:59+00:00): Lukket for omkring 13 år siden
MKnight (2016-04-02 22:32:39+00:00): was muss man sich denn unter type=Special Airfield vorstellen?
majji (2019-11-12 15:37:34+00:00): "Hi PetaMap,
Trust you are doing well. While reviewing some of the road network in Surabaya. I have come across some ways in the locality such as
 way 151876829
way 151876825
way 151876827 
are created by you and have been marked as highway=path for classification. However, going by aerial imagery and other ways around we can upgrad the classification as residential. Request you to suggest if otherwise.

Thanks in advance"
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-09-02 08:02:25+00:00): Hi LTKA,
I changed the classification of the road (way151898251) to be unclassified highway. I also made some changes around this changeset. Thank you.
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-07-28 02:55:54+00:00): Hi LTKA, I modified this road (way151966563), change to residential road and smoothing the geometry. thank you
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-07-28 03:05:14+00:00): I also modified this road (way151966538), changed the residential road to unclassified road. thank you
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-12-21 03:02:38+00:00): Proszę wykalibrować wszystkie budynki w gminie Raczki do podkładu z geoportalu. W obecnej sytuacji nie widzę możliwości zrobienia importu adresacji.
pyram (2022-12-30 13:41:16+00:00): Hi martinbone,
thank you for your benefits.
Long time ago you added these "housenumbers":
https://nominatim.org/qa/#map=14.78/51.14/-0.47&layer=addr_housenumber_no_digit

I think, this should be "addr:housename" ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:* )!?

Best regards
pyram
fabiotofy (2022-07-31 02:39:04+00:00): sicuro di questo nome "Via D'Ombra" per la strada forestale ?
SK53 (2018-12-07 11:29:52+00:00): Should the traffic lights named "The Commodore" have some kind of junction tag. At the moment it renders remarkably early as it is (perhaps a bug in Carto-CSS)
will_p (2018-12-07 15:55:44+00:00): I'm surprised it doesn't have a junction tag already. Perhaps junction=crossroads could be added? I don't think that would make any difference to the rendering though. Looking at other junction names I've added, they do all appear to render too early, so I think it is probably a rendering issue rather than a problem with the tagging.
Takuto (2016-04-28 14:10:52+00:00): Посмотри пожалуйста местоположение автостанции в Спас-Деменске - по новому Бингу там ничего похожего нет.
SDmitrii (2016-05-01 04:14:30+00:00): Я не знаю, когда смогу уточнить, но лет пять назад автобусы действительно заезжали в аппендикс к вокзалу.
largescale (2015-09-12 23:26:24+00:00): Not so good :-) Please stick to the Chinese naming convention and dont mix Latin and Chinese names 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#China,
Allison P (2020-05-02 19:35:50+00:00): I don't think section lines should be a part of OSM. They aren't on-the-ground features.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-03 16:39:10+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/618773911/history has un = yes that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by un=yes? It seem to be not documented value and has no obvious meaning.
habi (2018-08-20 10:16:33+00:00): Ciao FischersFritz.
Ich bin via http://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/2669/task/2458393 über dieses Changeset gestolpert.
Findest du die Telefonnummer der PostAuto AG (0848 888 888) in den Nodes nötig?
Soll ich die Telefonummer ins internationale Format überführen oder grad löschen?
E Gruess,
Habi
SomeoneElse (2015-10-26 14:13:59+00:00): Oops - I think that something went a bit wrong with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3293099/history here, it got changed to "lit=yes; no". From memory http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131559947 is not lit and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3293099/history is, but I'm not sure how much of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/211447351/history (and the corresponding section on the other carriageway) is.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-28 21:11:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151173302/history - te plany są nadal aktualne?
Allison P (2024-02-08 18:26:00+00:00): Sorth? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/10824707
Allison P (2024-02-08 18:26:19+00:00): Oops, copy and paste fail. Meant to link to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6706581
Riyadi IRM-RV (2020-08-04 04:52:48+00:00): hi LTKA. just to inform you. i realign  unclassified road.way 152426069. thank you
hahae (2025-07-05 12:30:54+00:00): 请问北苑路的法语名Route Běiyuàn 是怎么来的
eggie (2017-03-20 08:47:46+00:00): Beter laat dan nooit....

"Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2018-11-16 08:35:17+00:00): PB gestuurd met opnieuw welkom
popilen (2018-07-13 12:50:38+00:00): Ciao Fabrizio, una amica mi riferisce che nei paraggi del sentiero 761 che sale a Raschetto non ha trovato le prime due "wayside_shrine" che forse hai inserito tu.
Ha invece trovato una cappelletta, che ora ho inserito io, dove ho messo il bollino blu, cappelletta che puoi vedere qui:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/661435740669412/permalink/1477771519035826/
Sei sicuro che le prime due "wayside_shrine" esistano e siano correttamente mappate?
eggie (2020-06-09 12:25:44+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen die iedereen nu krijgt.. bij deze alsnog
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-27 16:04:00+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2021-10-17 16:28:51+00:00): Na vele jaren weer bijdragen in Nederland, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2018-01-20 09:38:22+00:00): a jaren weer een edit: Daarom alsnog Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Valerio_Bozzolan (2022-09-01 07:56:06+00:00): Grazie per l'import. Ho notato che alcuni edifici che probabilmente non esistono più da almeno 20 anni risultavano probabilmente presenti in questo dataset. Per esempio gli edifici di fronte alla Tomba Brion.
Procedo all'eliminazione degli edifici che non ho riscontrato durante la perlustrazione di ieri. Soprattutto gli edifici non hanno identificativi della regione.
Valerio_Bozzolan (2022-09-01 07:56:19+00:00): E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152898499
Gumeg (2016-07-08 08:37:50+00:00): Парковый переулок точно highway=living_street ? таким тегом омтечаются лишь улицы со знаком "Жилая зона". Кроме того смущает одностронне движение. Из этой улицы только выезжают??
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-28 07:12:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24478977/history has access:vehicle that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using vehicle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:vehicle ) be fitting at least equally well?
Janice Nordin (2017-09-27 10:52:48+00:00): Great, thank you!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-31 14:10:20+00:00): Hello and sorry for bothering you about an ancient note!

Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3474019 ?
Borut@OSM (2015-09-28 06:03:39+00:00): Bitte die Forststraßen aufgrund der Luftaufnahmen sehr vorsichtig einzeichnen und anschließend vor Ort verifizieren. 

Die Forststraße um Hochtratten https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153179379 existiert als ein geschlossener Ring nicht. Wenn man dem folgt, ist man dann gezwungen, einen großen Umweg zu machen. 

Ich werde in den nächsten Tagen und Wochen den Bereich aufgrund meiner vor Ort Wanderung aktualisieren. 

Danke und liebe Grüße aus Leoben, 
Borut
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:36:37+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1658993926/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
osmviborg (2024-02-01 15:46:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627741228
aceman444 (2020-05-11 17:19:22+00:00): Zdravim, aky objekt je 'cajkov' a preco sa nazyva 'kuriatka' ?
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-01-14 12:21:12+00:00): Hi! In this changeset you added lots of buildings in Marian Avenue/Place ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/10874908#map=18/53.02922/-7.30670), and many of the buildings overlapped. I've cleaned it up now. Do you know about the JOSM terracer and building utils plugsin? :)
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-19 18:15:29+00:00): What you wanted to represent by adding https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1659875823/history ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-20 08:28:56+00:00): And is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1659876096 representing anything really existing?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-02 15:18:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4693068
VitalieS (2020-11-26 00:59:39+00:00): Bună,
Cunoașteți dacă magazinul Ecran de la această locație mai activează?
eggie (2019-06-17 13:40:33+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze.. Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
user_1974520 (2016-06-12 20:45:49+00:00): Ciao DaniloP, perché questa fontana l' hai taggata come natural=spring? Non era meglio come amenity=fountain drinking_water=yes?
DaniloP (2016-08-01 12:41:32+00:00): Ciao, sì si tratta di una fontana. Penso di aver corretto!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-03 09:41:23+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1663778925/history has shop = alterations that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=alterations ? What kind of alterations? Of clothing? Of engines?
jeka p (2016-07-15 19:00:35+00:00): те саме тут: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4304948221
Hb- (2026-05-01 06:08:05+00:00): Das Entstehungsjahr des Carler Teiches wird hier https://www.harzlife.de/teiche/carler-teich.html mit ~1540 angegeben. Hier wurde 1673 eingetragen
Ogmios (2026-05-01 10:51:36+00:00): Ich hab es übernommen und gleich in den Wikidata-Eintrag übertragen mit der Quelle. Woher das Datum 1673 kam, kann ich jetzt nicht mehr sagen.
SomeoneElse (2020-05-23 11:48:22+00:00): Hello Marcos F,
I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 8 years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/153925437 was added with a "source=Google" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.
If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
Marcos F (2020-05-27 14:14:20+00:00): Ok, so please change to "local_knowledge"
eggie (2018-08-03 10:34:32+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen voor OSM, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
OPerivar (2015-09-01 04:06:27+00:00): kein barrier=lift_gate an Bahnüberwegen setzen, sondern  crossing:barrier=*
user_5359 (2016-11-18 08:48:25+00:00): Hallo Caronna, durch die Note 766574 bin ich auf Deinen vier Jahre alten Eintrag aufmerksam geworden. Hast Du etwas dagegen, dass wir den Hochsitz durch ein club=sport, sport=shooting ersetzen (das sich wohl in der Zwischenzeit durchgesetzt hat)? Ist das Gebäude 2a das zugehörige Schützenheim?

Mit freundlichen Grüßen        Georg V. (OSM=user_5359)
Caronna (2016-11-18 12:53:31+00:00): mach ma ;) ist eigentlich ein träger für eine Zielscheibe. 2a? vermutlich ja, bin mir aber nicht sicher.
cor dem Zielhalter ist nich son Gestell mit einem Rohr wo das Gewehr reingelegt wird, damit der Tragekasten nicht verfehlt werden kann, Gruß aus der Eifel
Steffen
SomeoneElse (2017-06-24 21:29:39+00:00): Hello,
What does "disused=no:isolated" on "Cromford Canal - Pinxton Arm (new line)" (now named as "Smotherfly Wide") mean here?  I'm confused - as this stretch of waterway has had or is hoping to have at least 3 uses - a previously one as a diversion for the Erewash during opencasting, a current one as a bit of an unofficial nature reserve free from development, and a possible future one as a part of a reconnected Cromford Canal (but that last one's a considerable distance away with no actual plans in motion as far as I can tell).
Best Regards,
Andy
SkegHammer (2017-06-25 09:00:31+00:00): See: http://tinyurl.com/y6v8a5le  Feel free to update tags if appropriate. Rgds //Mike
SkegHammer (2017-06-25 09:25:37+00:00): See also: http://tinyurl.com/yal3n4u4. A small scale map generated back in 2012 from the tags here: http://tinyurl.com/yar46lde
SomeoneElse (2017-06-25 14:57:04+00:00): Thanks - so it's supposed to indicate bits that are disconnected, but are usable in some way as a canal?

The bottom bit of Smotherfly isn't (I retagged that as drain because that's closer to what it is now).  The top bit is probably wide enough, but there's no way to get a boat in and out.
The Cromford side is physically accessible, but I don't think it's open to the public?  Should that be disused=no:isolated too?
Best Regards,
Andy
SkegHammer (2017-06-25 18:53:32+00:00): I think probably disused=yes if it's not open to the public. I can't remember what info I had that caused me to tag it as no:isolated. Rgds //Mike
SomeoneElse (2017-06-26 15:06:52+00:00): Thanks - I'll review the local ones to see if any others need changing.
Humitos (2014-11-05 01:03:54+00:00): Hola, ¿cómo estás? Por favor, ¿podrías indicar que significa el tag "occupant" y el nombre que tiene en el valor.
PcMouse1 (2025-07-19 03:11:30+00:00): Bonjour mml12, 

Est-ce que ce ces batiments sont cartographie par la main ou importe? Beaucoup de batiments sont mal alignees.
AnStBoc (2015-11-22 03:10:10+00:00): Адрес: дом 15
GerdP (2017-09-29 08:39:27+00:00): Hi there!
You have used the tag highway=snow_path
for 4 ways, e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183478110
This tag is not used anywhere else. My understanding is that highway=path + 
ice_road=yes
might be better here? Or maybe route=piste ?
See also
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ice_road
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dpiste
yangbb (2017-06-13 05:37:10+00:00): 公交
glglgl (2016-01-05 22:38:40+00:00): Die hier gelöschte U 65a (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/157454) existiert. Habe sie daher wiederhergestellt.
GITNE (2018-08-12 16:38:50+00:00): Hallo ajoessen,

Warum ist der Schlüssel „place=town“ in „de:place“ umgewandelt worden? Der Schlüssel „de:place” wird von keinem Verbraucher verarbeitet, im Gegensatz zu „place“.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-12 06:37:09+00:00): Zerkniesz na http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1136396 ?
Hjart (2015-02-03 16:30:09+00:00): Ok. Det var altså meningen at det skulle være en cykelsti, selvom det blev tagget som briddleway (ridesti)
zstadler (2017-03-26 13:16:55+00:00): Ways 380785433, 154456997 have no tags. What are they?
zstadler (2017-03-27 13:27:08+00:00): Correction: Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154456997
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 13:48:31+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70767321
eggie (2017-11-01 07:18:55+00:00): Opnieuw ...Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
4004 (2021-11-10 17:52:46+00:00): в заметке говорят, Заречье https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7525311/history мол не там отмечено, и вроде как в мапиллари тоже видно - изначальные границы были из какого то авторитетного источника?
marc__marc (2026-02-12 08:06:52+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/150261915/history/3
Slove est-il une typo pour stove ?
Cordialement,
Marc
bjoern_m (2016-02-28 22:34:38+00:00): Moin, was sind denn das für komische Brückenmittenpunkte da in Rothenburgsort? Werden die (nach 4 Jahren) noch gebraucht?
Viele Grüße
BubbaJuice (2021-09-22 14:06:16+00:00): Hey MojaveNC,
The polygons you made in this changeset are very low quality. Much of the area they cover isn't even forest but is shrubland (scrub). That is why I think they should be deleted. A follow up response if you agree or disagree with me would be appreciated.
Thanks.
MissingCSAA (2021-09-22 17:37:46+00:00): Thanks BubbaJuice. The areas in those "wood" polygons are juniper-piñon forest, so I'd have a hard time accepting that as downgrading to scrub (which is definitely true of downslope areas). The polygons could probably be cleaner.
Ramying (2017-06-11 09:54:18+00:00): Il quartiere lombardo non è solamente il quadrilatero compreso tra Viale Europa, Viale San Martino, Via Catania e Via Lucania (mentre il quadrilatero compreso tra Via La Farina, Viale Europa, Viale San Martino e Via Lucania è il quartiere Americano)?
Constable (2018-02-16 10:50:32+00:00): hi there, are you sure about this area tagged as leisure park? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154865552
Wouldn't multiple leisure=pitch better suit the area? Parks should be green areas where people can play with kids, run and stuff like that, here I see mainly baseball pitches.
What's your idea on it? thanks
jlevente (2018-09-11 15:25:15+00:00): the area you mentioned has been remapped by someone else. generally, I think it is fine to map these places as leisure=park as people go there for recreation. and you can always add more details inside (e.g. pitches). I would prefer to stick with leisure=park over sports center or anything else. There are pavilions here you can rent and stuff, so it's not just baseball pitches.
ElliottPlack (2025-01-27 16:13:26+00:00): hi there, Elliott here with the Data Working Group. This edit deleted a bunch of city names from the map (albeit over a decade ago). Was there any particular reason to delete all of that information?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 19:00:39+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1674676697/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
nw520 (2022-12-20 11:27:41+00:00): Hallo FahRadler, weißt du zufällig noch, ob „Entlang der Bist“ ein verbreiteter Namen für diesen Weg ist? Ein anderer OSM-Beitragender hat ihn zwischenzeitlich zu „Entlang der Bist        -         Entlang der Grenze“ umbenannt.
FahRadler (2022-12-23 07:43:25+00:00): Hallo nw520,
das war so die Bezeichnung von mehreren aus Überherrn.
Ich hab gesehen dass GPS-Hobby wieder zurückgesetzt hat.
Er fiel mir schon mehrfach durch krude Änderungen und vor allem Namen auf. 
Frohe Weihnachten
Warin61 (2023-03-27 04:58:59+00:00): Hi,
These relations named 'Loop 1', 'Loop 2', 'Loop 3' ... what are they??? Are there any web pages on them?
Warin61 (2023-04-07 05:19:10+00:00): Removed relations...
Nakaner (2015-05-25 09:09:59+00:00): Wie bist du denn beim Bahnhofsgebäude auf die Adresse "Eisenbahnstraße 1" gekommen? Laut Maps4BW ist das Eisenbahnstraße 50. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155065773
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-14 04:30:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155076555 do you know if this is completed? Imagery is inconclusive
user_8466505 (2020-11-27 19:41:29+00:00): Documentation?
mueschel (2018-09-20 14:11:11+00:00): Hi,
I know this is an old import, but could you comment on the tags on these bus stops? There are several which don't look like they should appear in OSM. Is there any way to change them to some common tagging scheme to make this information accessible by all our applications?

Cheers, Jan

For example:
Bike_Route=No
Id=0
Location=Pierce Avenue and Old Horton Road
OBJECTID=289
Route=Ocmulgee
Type=1
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-12 17:06:44+00:00): At least the bus stop at the south pole https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1676466607/history has already been deleted :)
zluuzki (2021-08-03 15:02:06+00:00): I reverted this entirely, because everything is completly wrong - locations, tags, no source, ...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109100174
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-23 20:41:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1676466614/history has Id=0 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
marc__marc (2025-12-29 13:02:41+00:00): Hello,
can you review this note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5109650 ?
Regards,
Marc
tuxayo (2015-09-20 13:59:32+00:00): It seems this changeset used a different alignment than this one:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/11003497
lucadelu (2021-04-23 09:51:36+00:00): Non credo che credo sia corretto mappare le cascate come un'area, va segnato come punto https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Awaterway%3Dwaterfall
SomeoneElse (2018-10-10 19:53:13+00:00): Hello,
What does "source=null" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89167128/history mean?
Best Regards,
Andy
DeBigC (2021-07-26 07:18:19+00:00): The landuse=brownfield that was applied here in 2012 is no longer required as I see residential here now https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.36586621160319&lng=-6.247545008577731&z=18.773893928674994&pKey=300630731600839&focus=photo&x=0.4049555145635672&y=0.6534970835116952&zoom=1.3777267508610793
tuxayo (2015-09-20 13:54:44+00:00): There is are a lot of building alignment problems:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/438253
Владимир К (2018-04-03 08:55:43+00:00): У вас неверно обозначены лесные кварталы. Сейчас есть схема специально для них, вот тут подробно описано как нужно обозначать https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Alekzzander/diary/42476