piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-02-27 15:20:36+00:00): Je hebt parkeerterreinen Die geef je aan met amenity=parking

De wegen op een parkeerterrein hebben de tags highway=service
service=parking_aisle
Hewoon langs de straatparkeren kun je aangeven met parking:lane:parallel (of perpendicular)= right, left. both 

Een nieuwere tagging (proposal)  is die grotere haven toch als parkeerterrein te taggen, maar met een restrictie  parking=street_side

Zie ook wiki amenity=parking
Maar probeer eerst maar zelf... Kijk straks wel.. Alles is te herstellen.
Succes,
eggie
opposecartilage (2021-02-27 15:23:01+00:00): Heb hem net aangemaakt!

Zal vanavond ook maar eens wat meer tutorials kijken op Youtube want correct taggen is wel een ding natuurlijk...
eggie (2021-02-27 15:27:20+00:00): Yep.. 'k Heb feedback op de changeset gezet. Het is allemaal rijstebrij in het begin. 
Dus hier gewoon amenity=parking
met evt aanvullingen.
street_side weghalen van het wegdeel
highway=service
service=parking_aisle
!bm (2021-02-28 14:37:09+00:00): Hallo ironspock,

visibility=area scheint mir für Litfaßsäulen zu hoch gegriffen, *=street scheint passender – man könnte sogar *=house argumentieren, weil die Werbebotschaften eher nur von Fußgängern gut erfasst werden kann. S. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:visibility

Beide entsprechend korrigiert.

--besteGrüße!bm
totera (2021-02-27 16:36:32+00:00): government=commune non mi sembra proprio adatto per la Regione...
FinixFighter (2021-02-27 21:18:01+00:00): Grazie per avermelo fatto notare, l'ho selezionato per sbaglio, volevo mettere town_council, inoltre avevo già in mente di fare altre ricerche per capire se è il tag più adatto. Secondo te town_council può andar bene? Hai qualche suggerimento?
totera (2021-02-28 18:44:55+00:00): Neanche town_council (= consiglio comunale) direi che va bene. Potrebbero andare local (173 occorrenze su taginfo), local_authority (127), local_government (122) o regional (5)
FinixFighter (2021-03-01 07:39:20+00:00): OK, grazie per i consigli!
pyrog (2021-02-27 11:21:06+00:00): As-tu une photo pour celui-là ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8463184317

Il est au sur le chemin ??

Yves
LGjm (2021-02-27 12:54:50+00:00): Je n'ai pas de photo, désolé
Sur le bord de la route (D768), les propriétaires on fait installer un grand panneau "Défibrillateur"... L'appareil est installé dans la cours de la propriété, dans un coffret. Il est accessible à tout le monde...
Cordialement
JMARC
pyrog (2021-03-16 07:24:35+00:00): Merci Jean-Marc pour l'ajout du DAE au stade de Camors.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8463175217

Si tu es certain qu'un défibrillateur est  à l'extérieur, tu peux rajouter opening_hours=24/7 pour indiquer qu'il est tout le temps accessible.

A l'intérieur d'un bâtiment, c'est utile de mettre les horaires d'ouverture quand ils sont réguliers (ce qui n'est pas évident pour des salles des fêtes…).

Cordialement,
Yves
Discostu36 (2025-05-11 18:56:42+00:00): Bitte separate eingezeichnete Fußwege am Übergang zu impliziten Bürgersteigen mit der Fahrbahn verbinden, um vernünftiges Routing zu gewährleisten. Außerdem sollte der Way der Fahrbahn dann mit foot=use_sidepath getaggt werden, um die Nutzungspflicht abzubilden.
Kautilya3 (2021-06-22 20:17:27+00:00): Soumya8974, this is not a "historic place". It is still claimed by India as Indian territory. See the Wikipedia page on Depsang Bulge.
user_11418917 (2021-10-14 08:34:16+00:00): Hello NFZANMNIM, Why did you delete the ref tags of the roads?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100090200
NFZANMNIM (2021-10-14 08:42:07+00:00): I did this edit last year lol.
anyways, I removed Baghdad's urban road refs because, 
1. as far as I know, there is no official source that assigns road numbers to Baghdad urban roads,
2. Baghdad urban boulevards and expressways are not numbered on their signage, whereas inter-urban Iraqi roads are numbered.
user_11418917 (2021-10-14 10:40:43+00:00): As local and have local knowledge to the area, they are correct.    
Please next time don’t remove valid data because “as far as you know” this is not a source, you should make sure and be sure %100 before editing such things or removing these data.      
Edit them back. Thank you and regards.
NFZANMNIM (2021-10-14 14:12:00+00:00): Is there any actual evidence of this information? picture of a street name sign? picture of a road sign? or an official Federal or municipal map?
user_11418917 (2021-10-14 15:11:11+00:00):  NFZANMNIM, as I said, local knowledge, I'm local, you're not! you're not even Iraqi. You can't just remove valid data when you "as far as you know", no offense but you don't know anything about Baghdad road numbering and you think they are non exciting, therefore you should never edit such thing without knowledge.         
         
You said "2. Baghdad urban boulevards and expressways are not numbered on their signage, whereas inter-urban Iraqi roads are numbered." And this is absolutely wrong and untrue, and here is few map picture to look that I have on my laptop, even big streets have both road name and road number.                   
https://i.ibb.co/0j24s56/photo-2019-05-10-16-21-24-2.jpg         
And     
https://i.ibb.co/1Qd76FC/image.jpg        
Edit these numbers that you deleted in this changeset and others. Thank you.
user_11418917 (2021-10-16 08:05:15+00:00): Dear NFZANMNIM, it's been 2 days since my last message to you, please don't ignore my messages and reply to me. Are you gonna revert your ref tags deletion or not? You know removing such valid data consider as vandalism, so revert it. If you don't want to revert let me know and I will do it. Thank you and regards.
NFZANMNIM (2021-10-16 08:08:15+00:00): Hey

I do not have the ability to revert as I do OSM editing from my browser... and there's no revert option or anything there. if you could do it, that'd be appreciated
user_11418917 (2021-10-16 08:56:54+00:00): The revert option is not possible now since there is newer version that would resolve a conflict, you can edit them back in your browser by putting this changeset number and the other ones  in osmcha and you will see the one you deleted, in this changeset it’s around 250, you can add them back manually and put the data you deleted back.   
The other data that you deleted you can see them in overpass if you don’t wanna go and see your history of edits.    
Please don’t remove any more tags in Iraq if you dont know anything about.       
Also if you edit in Iraq again please provide sources in the changeset source so we can validate it.   
Regards.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-16 11:30:38+00:00): @lockdownguy Please calm down.  "it's been 2 days since my last message to you, please don't ignore my messages" - do you seriously expect a reply in two days?  People have families, jobs and lives outside of OSM, and it's unreasonable to expect someone to reply so quickly.
user_11418917 (2021-10-16 11:37:36+00:00): @someoneelse I said that because he was super active editing in OSM in the last couple of days, he wasn’t away. After my comment here he start edit in Iraq. And yes to be honest I was kinda mad when I see someone vandalized my citie like that and deleted every road number…   Regards
SomeoneElse (2021-10-16 11:38:09+00:00): With regard to re-adding the "ref" values back, a revert of this changeset wouldn't be easy because (a) it was 8 months ago, and other people have edited things since and (b) some new items were added here too (of which https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/911464817 is one example).
If it would help, I can probably try and sort out a list of ways which just had the "ref" removed in this change and revert those ref removals, but I suspect that it'll fix only a small part of the problem - just look at the ref changes on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4074318/history as an example ("ref=2;4;5" is a clear example of an invalid merge).
SomeoneElse (2021-10-16 11:43:02+00:00): Something that either of you could use to add the ref values back through normal editing is https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1c7t .  That shows what ref values were in place on trunk roads on 1st Feb this year.  You can of course change the area that the query covers, change the date or change the highway type.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_11418917 (2021-10-16 11:46:35+00:00): I will try re add them back later today or tomorrow. I’ll add some official sources too if I can. Thank you and regards
SomeoneElse (2021-10-16 12:18:02+00:00): Thanks.
One other thing to perhaps think about - if there aren't signs for these you might think about adding "ref:signed=no" or similar (there are a few variations on that; see taginfo).
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-10-23 10:15:40+00:00): @lockdownguy Are you happy that all the trunk road refs that you said that you were going to re-add are correct?
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cja (from yesterday) shows fewer than https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1cjb (from February).
user_11418917 (2021-10-23 23:59:10+00:00): Thank you @SomeoneElse,     
  unfortunately I couldn't make it yesterday because at work I had to much pressure so I didn't want to take this task now cause it's a headache for me, in that time I was adding grass lands etc.. you know, easy tasks, Now on the weekend I have time and I'm free to add what was deleted in this changeset and the others by the same user, I will use your overpass link and edit the time etc.. Thanks again and have a great evening sir.       
Best regards.      
        
           
I typed this comment above before you did this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5403  And couldn't comment so I went and saw that you did this... super disrespectful.. super unjustifiable.. and super wrong... I'm the one who contacted you and report what happend, I'm not gonna name it this time but you know what is war edit when someone re-edit the same edit without providing any official sources to back the name change, name changing entire nighborhoods in that particular way is clear sign of "that word"..          
Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism#Vandalism_and_other_types_of_bad_editing          
The user I reported did these:       
* Disputes within the OpenStreetMap database (edit wars)       
^ his edits in Israel and his edits in the Gulf       
* Purposeful removal or degradation of data that are known to be correct      
^ his road numbers removal in Baghdad      
* Persistent disruptive behaviour     
^ as discussed in the changesets.      
But you blocked me who reported these, cool...         
 Anyway, I'm not gonna argue this anymore because you don't seem to understand my words unfortunately, anyway, had a nice day..
user_11418917 (2021-10-24 00:40:08+00:00): I'm looking at the overpass query you provided, unfortunately it doesn't cover all of the deleted road numbers this user deleted, it only shows the "trunk" highways. I edited to include the other tags, And it's too much...    
In this changeset alone he deleted 231 ref tags, it's not easy to readd, it will need time, he deleted refs in: trunk, trunk_link, motorway, motorway_link, secondary, tertiary,  construction, residential, primary, etc..   he also deleted another tags which was ref:ar..         
This is a headache to deal with, I've been trying adding them back but I'm just dizzy now.. It would be nice if the NFZANMNIM edit them back just like the way he deleted them manually..           
Best regards..
eggie (2021-02-27 10:49:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
mdgabriel (2021-03-02 13:27:04+00:00): Hi. Thank you for mapping on this area. However, I noticed that these features are not yet present in the imageries currently available to OSM. May I ask what is the source of your data and if there is a corresponding approval to upload these on OSM? Thank you.

Also same concern as above for the following changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100088173
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100045338
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100042945
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99772980
eggie (2021-02-27 11:06:26+00:00): Dag Guido.. Let op dat je de paden niet overal vastplakt aan de landuse. Ol heb wat losgemaakt.
De linker alttoets gebruiken tijdens intekenen voorkomt dat.
mvg
eggie
guido-vh (2021-02-27 15:45:29+00:00): Bedoel je het smalle pad onder het vijvertje? Dat klikte inderdaad op de grens van het grasland (geboortebos), jij hebt het al losgemaakt?
eggie (2021-02-27 15:50:28+00:00): Alle paden zaten vastgeplakt in het geboortebos. Ze liggen weer los.
Hier kun je zien waar dart het geval was. Het is geen ramp.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100090396

mapse
eggie
eggie (2021-02-27 11:13:46+00:00): tracktype=grade?  is de specificatie van een highway=track  Je hebt er een wandelpad van gemaakt. Dan kan die regel dus weg.
Kort door de bocht
G7 bord of duidelijk bedoeld voor wandelaar dan highway=footway
geen bord en smal dan highway=path  (routeert voor tweewielers) dus vehicle=no als dat niet mag.
Breedspoor voor bv landbouwvoertuigen  .. dan highway=track met tracktype
Dus kijk nog even.. 

De paden hier heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse.

MVG
eggie
guido-vh (2021-02-27 16:04:20+00:00): Dank voor je commentaar.
Geen G7 bord, maar wel duidelijk bedoelt voor wandelaar (hondenlosloopterrein); niet expliciet verboden voor fietsers. Dan zou je er ook met de auto op mogen? want ook geen auto-verbodsbord. Wel smal, 1-1.5m, met harde zandlaag.
Wat zou je aanraden?
eggie (2021-02-27 16:11:53+00:00): Op een highway=footway routeert niets met wielen.

highway=path als er geen bord staat. Dan routeert het ook voor fietsers.
Auto s routeren per default niet op een path. Dat hoef je niet te taggen.
Een highway=track routeert wel voor motorvoertuigen. Daar dan motor_vehicle=no
Mits er een bord staat.
eggie (2021-02-27 11:40:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2021-03-02 14:20:20+00:00): Hallo,
das Tag 'share_busway=yes' gibt es nicht. Was bedeutet das?
Emya (2021-03-02 18:40:14+00:00): eigentlich soll da stehen
cycleway:right=share_busway
also an dieser Stelle ist die rechte Spur einen Busspur und als Radspur definiert.
Ich schau nochmal ob ich da was falsch gemacht habe.
mueschel (2021-03-02 18:45:42+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Dann muss aus dem "share_busway=yes"  ein "busway:right = lane" werden. 

An diesen 11 Wegen:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/14oE
maro21 (2021-02-27 12:46:09+00:00): Naprawdę salon fryzjerski ma nazwę "Pizzeria"?
Dracaron (2021-02-27 12:52:10+00:00): To nie jest już fryzjer. Jest tam teraz Pizzeria. http://www.farinapizza.pl/.
maro21 (2021-04-25 18:28:04+00:00): Dzięki za info! Poprawiłem
literan (2021-04-07 08:32:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8463256805/history

это киоск, и прямо в киоске кафе со столиками??? (amenity=cafe)?

не дубль ли это соседней точки, которую вы добавили?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-15 18:32:01+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/6340494/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
jcr83 (2022-10-07 08:00:08+00:00): Bonjour,
D'après le document cité, la circulation des véhicules à moteur n'est pas interdite pour tous. Par conséquent, access=no est trop restrictif.
Je vous suggère d'jouter les autorisations private, forestry et agricultural (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access).
Il manque l'accès pour les chasseurs, que je ne sais pas comment indiquer.
lyctkel (2023-12-05 16:48:04+00:00): Moin Andreas König,
bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3417437012 hat sich wohl ein Kopierfehler und möglicherweise auch ein Verständnisfehler ergeben.
recycling:glass = farmland
recycling:paper = farmland
recycling:plastic = farmland
sieht ungewöhnlich aus. 
Ich nehme an es war
recycling:glass_bottles = yes
recycling:paper = yes
recycling:plastic = yes
gemeint (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling).
Viele Grüße,
lyctkel
user_11418917 (2021-02-27 16:50:55+00:00): STOP ADDING SPAM! I'VE  COMMENTED BEFORE TELLING YOU TO NOT ADD ANOTHER SPAM! IF ONE ANOTHER SPAM ADDING YOU WILL BE REPORTED!
szalona_entropia (2021-03-14 00:30:23+00:00): Nie wiem skąd pomysł, że DW344 nie istnieje.
Dawid2849 (2021-03-14 08:43:35+00:00): Cóż... Zobaczyłem uwagę o tym, że nie istnieje, więc chciałem szybko zweryfikować i znalazłem to:
http://g.ekspert.infor.pl/p/_dane/akty_pdf/U70/2011/212/3647.pdf
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droga_wojew%C3%B3dzka_nr_344

Jeżeli się pomyliłem, to przepraszam.
szalona_entropia (2021-03-14 10:54:14+00:00): Kluczowy fragment uchwały: " pod    warunkiem zaliczenia drogi wojewódzkiej nr   344 do kategorii dróg gminnych przez Radę Gminy Kobierzyce"
Dawid2849 (2021-03-14 11:01:40+00:00): W takim razie przepraszam i Wikipedia do zmiany.
user_5359 (2021-02-28 05:28:27+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag added=72.36km (see https://www.osm.org/way/864552136 and other railway inside of Feroze Gandhi Unchahar Thermal Power Station https://www.osm.org/way/148452693).

this information belongs (regardless of whether this information is correct at all) to the change record and not to the individual data.
ivanbranco (2021-02-28 15:10:15+00:00): Also this tag: aaaaa=aaaaa 
here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847089563/
DaxServer (2021-03-05 18:32:20+00:00): Hello.

Why have you deleted the data from nodes:

2665437088
4885601110
5936565061

Please revert them.
RobertEves92 (2021-02-28 08:15:09+00:00): These pavements are intended to be combined cycle/footpaths, and work is in progress to make them as such, however they have not been completed and there are no markings showing that they are cycle paths as yet
VitalieS (2021-03-02 02:34:00+00:00): Bună, 
Locația a fost adăugată inițial cu numele de „Buono Caffè”, iar ulterior i-a fost adăugată denumirea în română de „Betty Ice”. Cum se numește de fapt?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100092950
joder (2021-03-03 08:57:35+00:00): Hi Vitalie, it is just a very small kiosk/ice cream stand and probably does not it´s own specific name. Betty Ice and also Buono Caffe are both brand names, which the kiosk is selling...
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 12:15:29+00:00): You're breaking perfectly working tags. It is clearly stated in wiki that waterway=riverbank is a perfectly working tag which should not be changed. Reverted changes in Lithuania.
Dimitar155 (2021-02-27 17:01:29+00:00): How am I breaking "perfectly working tags" and what even is "perfectly working tags"? There is no such definition in the wiki.
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 17:12:06+00:00): The point is you are not "upgrading" any tags. You're just doing a pointless change removing tags which are perfectly fine. Therefore you're not doing anything good to this project.
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 17:13:29+00:00): And it is also said in wiki that water tags should NOT be changed just for the sake of changing it. You're not doing any improvement to the map, just going around and changing to tags with the same meaning.
Dimitar155 (2021-02-27 17:24:27+00:00): Since when "guarding" a country from other editors is considered good for OSM?
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 17:30:03+00:00): Since some people start "fixing" stuff which is not broken before getting to know OSM.
Dimitar155 (2021-02-27 17:49:05+00:00): But you are fixing stuff that are not broken..
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 17:54:55+00:00): waterway=riverbank is a perfectly woriking tag and there is no "upgrade" for it.
Dimitar155 (2021-02-27 17:59:11+00:00): natural=water + water=river is also perfectly working tag. Why wouldn't you want to use it?
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 18:11:53+00:00): The original is working very good and the new one does not add anything beneficial. General rule: do not touch things which work well and which you do not understand. Do not change things just in order to do some "change".
Dimitar155 (2021-02-27 18:23:29+00:00): I see that you haven't seen what I've done in my changesets. I fix the numerous mistakes that were made years ago and no one has fixed them (like disconnected ways, accidentally moved nodes in ways, duplicated ways/nodes etc.).
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 18:41:14+00:00): No, you have changed a lot of objects which you have not fixed. And anyway, at the sime time you've decided that you, after spending less than a year in OSM, will force everybody else to use duplicate water tags instead of the ones we used for more than 15 years? Why?
Dimitar155 (2021-02-27 18:54:51+00:00): There could be things that I have missed and there could be things that I can't fix since the imagery is not the best in some places. About your last question: it's not my decision. It is a project ran by another user. The goal is to unify the tagging system so that data consumers don't have to deal with different sets of tags. Also the existence of two way to tag the same thing thing is not necessary and generally decreases the quality of the data.
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 19:01:51+00:00): And thus you're doing damage to data consumers, who are using waterway=riverbank for 15 years or more. Ok, this has already wasted too much of my time. DO NOT CHANGE ANYTHING in Lithuania. We want data QUALITY, not chaos created by clueless "unifiers".
Dimitar155 (2021-02-27 19:06:21+00:00): These data consumers won't be here for a lot of time if they haven't changed anything in 15 years. If things don't change, this project will become even bigger chaos. Also you aren't the person to tell me what to do or not to do.
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 19:13:23+00:00): Data consumers do not want change for the sake of change. The new schema you're forcing does not have ANY advantages. You will not be able to force such changes on larger countries as they also oppose such unprofessional actions. We are here for way more than you have been here and probably will be more than you will be.
Dimitar155 (2021-02-27 19:22:40+00:00): The only data consumer that doesn't want the change is you. The new schema does not have any advantages FOR YOU. The world DOES NOT spin around you or Lithuania. I do not enforce these changes since anyone can revert anything if they so desire. I don't know who are you referring by "we", but I'm pretty sure that enforcing 15 years old policy isn't very professional. Also the fact that you have an account that is made before mine doesn't mean anything.
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 19:27:10+00:00): Eventually you will grow up and learn not to point fingers when you enter the house. Or maybe not :-)
Dimitar155 (2021-02-27 19:33:04+00:00): Are there any other countries that are guarded by people like you? Are there any projects except yours that rely on this exact tagging and doesn't want to  support the newer standard? I don't think that any company or project that doesn't want to improve over time will not survive for a lot of time. Even the governments upgrade their systems and scrap older technology.
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 19:38:07+00:00): There are pretty large countries where OSM users also think that duplicate water schema is not only giving no advantage, but has disadvantage from cartographic and mapping perspectives. Bye.
Dimitar155 (2021-02-27 19:42:21+00:00): This is what we are trying to solve. We want to remove waterway=riverbank in order to not have duplicate water schema. I don't see where is the problem.
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-27 19:46:50+00:00): Don't you think it is quite stupid to INTRODUCE duplicate schema and then try to "SOLVE" the duplication? This whole initiative of new water schema was introduced by nerds and is only pushed by nerds, it was never supported by anybody doing serious stuff.
Dimitar155 (2021-02-27 19:51:25+00:00): I haven't introduced this schema. The problem wouldn't even exist if by creating the new schema, the old one was deprecated. Unfortunately it wasn't done, but if it doesn't get done now it won't get done.