piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
santamariense (2020-10-24 01:23:07+00:00): Bem-vindo ao OSM. Não se pode modificar a classificação viária de forma aleatória (como me pareceu você ter feito). É preciso seguir um padrão.
Como mapear: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/Classifica%C3%A7%C3%A3o_das_rodovias_do_Brasil
Se não tiver certeza, não modifique. De modo geral as vias principais já estão corretamente mapeadas.
Qualquer dúvida, pergunte.
Karol_S (2020-10-24 10:38:07+00:00): Szanowny Panie, poprzednio odnotowane pełne nazwy "Góra Baranowska", "Góra Pogorzelska" są nie tylko spójne z zapisami w Państwowym Rejestrze Nazw Geograficznych, ale także z użyciem lokalnym. Skrócenie zapisu powoduje brak możliwości wyszukania tych obiektów pełną, stosowaną powszechnie nazwą i jest wątpliwą oszczędnością.
eggie (2020-10-23 16:11:16+00:00): Hi Cavemaker,  What do you mean with your comment BTE?
Please comment your edits properly.

 I disconnected the building from the landuse grass. 
Greetz,
eggie
Cavemaker (2020-10-23 16:16:38+00:00): Hello eggie, the comment "BTE" means that the changes are for a project called Build The Earth which short form is BTE. We are basically recreating the earth 1:1 in Minecraft and everytime I spot something that needs changes, I comment the changes with "BTE", because the reason behind the change is BTE. 
Greetings
Cavemaker
eggie (2020-10-23 16:32:16+00:00): Oke..  But Please comment your edits more clearly in the Netherlands. 
Thanks for reply.. 
 greetz,
Eggie,
canfe (2020-10-26 08:43:54+00:00): Sarebbe bene non cancellare mai nulla se proprio non indispensabile.
Se un negozio non c'è più ha senso, ma se si è spostato la comunità OSM consiglia di MODIFICARLO in modo da preservarne la history e poterne seguire nel tempo le modifiche.
PS: fai parte per caso del FIAB che metti le ciclofficine?
CinziaDR90 (2020-10-26 09:24:30+00:00): Buongiorno!
Avevo trovato uno accanto all'altro due nodi con nome uguale ("cicli Drigani") ed entrambi categorizzati come negozi di biciclette, mi sono quindi permessa di implementare le informazioni di uno ed eliminare il doppio.
Non faccio parte della Fiab, ma mi son presa a cuore l'aggiornamento delle ciclofficine in questo periodo in cui chi può evita l'uso dei mezzi pubblici. Avendo partecipato alle ultime due edizioni del mapping party di Torino ho pensato che aumentare in numero di officine presenti su mappa potesse essere d'aiuto a chi si sposta in bicicletta.
La ringrazio per il suggerimento in merito allo spostamento di negozi già esistenti, Le auguro una buona giornata,
Cinzia
canfe (2020-10-27 14:01:06+00:00): Di solito partecipo a quel mapping party.
Se smette il COVID ci si vede al prossimo party!
canfe (2020-11-17 14:40:38+00:00): Da ultimo: Via e Viale mettile con la V maiuscola come da standard.
A presto.
CinziaDR90 (2020-11-17 14:57:52+00:00): Ciao! Grazie della correzione, nei prossimi giorni farò un check per mettere a posto questi refusi.
Al prossimo mapping party (o, più probabilmente, alla prossima correzione)! :)
DD1GJ (2020-10-24 00:58:35+00:00): Hello Sergei,

please do not reopen a closed objekt, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92959564

Please correct your problematic change records, which you can find with the following query: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Zlh

Please also inform the Mapbox team leader in order to improve the quality of the company's processing.

Many thanks, Joachim
DD1GJ (2020-10-24 01:32:25+00:00): expanded query: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Zly
ennui3000 (2020-10-26 14:14:49+00:00): Hello
Thank you for pointing out these issues, I've made corrections.
DD1GJ (2020-10-24 00:30:47+00:00): Hello Sergei,

thanks for checking the data. By removing (closed) you reopen the restaurant. The note-tag is only a hint to other mappers and will not be evaluated. In such cases please use the life cycle prefix with disused:*

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

You can see my change by clicking the nade at https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92975384.

Greetings, Joachim
Riemer17 (2020-10-23 16:26:42+00:00): Eerst ging de route in 1 richting over de Insulindeweg, Dat klopt niet, in beide richtingen gaat de route voer de Flevoparkweg
Luzandro (2021-01-21 18:58:09+00:00): Hallo,

wenn du straßenbegleitende Gehsteige / Radwege als separate Ways anlegst, achte bitte darauf, dass du das Routing dadurch nicht zerstörst
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_bicycle&route=48.03504%2C16.38583%3B48.03560%2C16.38586#map=19/48.03552/16.38585

die Beschilderung als Radweg existiert auch nur auf der südlichen Triestingbrücke, bei der nördlichen Brücke ist es ein deutlich schmälerer, ganz normaler Gehsteig, auf dem Radfahren eigentlich nicht erlaubt ist (in dem Fall will dort wohl auch niemand fahren).

mMn. sind in solchen Fällen sidewalk/cycleway Tags besser geeignet, da sie deutlich weniger fehleranfällig sind und auch der Straßenname zum Routen verwendet werden kann

Wenn man es separat erfasst, bietet es sich außerdem an, die Brücke als man_made=bridge Fläche zu erfassen, damit es nicht aussieht, als wären dort 2 völlig separate Brücken nebeneinander
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dbridge

LG
Andreas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92960950
WaWei (2021-01-25 15:39:11+00:00): Hallo Andreas.
Sorry, mein Fehler!
1. Ich habe den Radweg entsprechend verkürzt. 
2. Normalerweise achte ich schon auf "seitliche Anbindungen", das habe ich hier aber leider übersehen. 
Und 3. besten Dank für den Tipp bzgl. der gemeinsamen Brücke - ist mir bisher entgangen. Werde gleich meine bisherigen Einträge (soweit ich mich noch erinnere) diesbezüglich überprüfen.
LG Walter
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92960950
Luzandro (2021-01-29 18:47:30+00:00): Super, danke
marczoutendijk (2020-10-26 11:36:03+00:00): Please use building=yes instead of barrier=wall.

Best regards,
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
fabiotofy (2020-10-28 20:35:27+00:00): quindi solo la parte di galleria (da svincolo a svincolo) viene identificata con il nome NSA425 ?
user_11166885 (2020-10-29 12:03:41+00:00): si, lo puoi trovare ufficialmente nel sito dell'anas nella sezione della ricerca delle strade
fabiotofy (2020-10-29 12:59:33+00:00): grazie, adesso faccio qualche ricerca. Ma che tu sappia la vecchia SR355 è percorribile ? a me pare di ricordare che può essere utilizzata solo lato "valle" per raggiungere Givigliana. Se vero dovremmo aggiungere su OSM l'informazione che la strada è stata interrotta (azione umana)....
user_11166885 (2020-10-29 17:08:15+00:00): È chiusa solo la way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129119372#map=16/46.5686/12.8178
alessandrocarmeli (2020-12-26 21:28:59+00:00): Salve, dopo aver visto la vostra discussione ho mappato io la tipologia di accesso nel tratto tra la strada per Tors ed il Rio Fulin.
marczoutendijk (2020-10-26 11:35:49+00:00): Please use building=yes instead of barrier=wall.

Best regards,
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2020-10-26 11:35:09+00:00): Please use building=yes instead of barrier=wall.

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2020-10-26 11:37:33+00:00): Why don't you connect all that segments of the same driveway?

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
DD1GJ (2020-10-25 06:39:59+00:00): Hallo tenepo,

Geisfeld wurde 1978 nach Strullendorf eingemeindet. Bei OSM ist addr:city der Hauptort und addr:suburb der Stadtteil bzw. Gemarkung. Deine Änderungen wurden daher zurückgesetzt.

Die Community verzichtet gerne auf Deine weitere  "Mitarbeit" als Sockenpuppe von hans peter von güntherhausen.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-25 08:06:04+00:00): Thanks - for info see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4113 .
trigpoint (2020-10-23 18:02:04+00:00): Hi  Mathilde
Thank you for your edit, it looks good.

You may want to change the construction landuse to commercial and it would be really useful if you could add the access roads so that satnavs will direct drivers to turn at the right place.

Cheers Phil
Mathilde Delorme (2020-10-23 18:24:09+00:00): Hi Phil, thank you for your comment! I checked the building type and it says warehouse, which has in the definition the fact that it is commercial. I am not sure where else I could add this info? Regarding the road, I tried to add it but with the points it was too geometrical and not enough "road like". This is my first time with OpenStreeMap so I'm not sure how to draw a road that looks like a road, and also to draw the roundabout that they installed to get from the main road. I will wait to see if someone else can participate to this edit with maybe a bit more experience so that I don't ruin the whole thing :) The most urgent thing for me was to get the building in there as we are using this in our Yard Management software to display on our Mapbox.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:33:51+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:41:51+00:00): source: bustimes.org
Frans S (2020-10-26 15:37:38+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
literan (2020-10-24 14:16:16+00:00): why do you make fake edits? there is NO free access here for motorcars now

photo from 2018, but it's actual now https://yandex.ru/maps/profile?l=stv%2Csta&ll=37.005384%2C55.630311&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=14.980294%2C-0.210928&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=37.629327%2C55.899735&panorama%5Bspan%5D=57.351212%2C30.247072&z=16
OSMPossum (2020-10-27 00:34:15+00:00): Hello literan, thanks for reaching out. I made my edits based on recent Mapillary images, from both directions, which show the lift gate is up well before the vehicle approaches. The northbound image is unclear, so I am curious what signs may exist. Would `motorcar=private` or `motorcar=permissive` be more appropriate on this lift gate? Also, I see there are some other lift gates missing from the data which would alter vehicle access to Нагорное. This route through a parking lot seems questionable (https://maps.openrouteservice.org/directions?n1=55.899992&n2=37.634343&n3=16&a=55.899475,37.63032,55.90223,37.629676&b=0&c=0&k1=en-US&k2=km), because there are lift gates at the west and east ends (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.90514694000001&lng=37.60848983000005&z=16.38371914608384&pKey=AQoLEPM2_s_2oqS-CgBdEA&focus=photo&x=0.5064327953684716&y=0.49155326055688625&zoom=0) and (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.90484797&lng=37.6119727&z=17&pKey=I9SDIFXPSZ8xpR5x7kOxDA&focus=photo). I have added these lift gates, if you would like to add any additional tags. Thanks!
literan (2020-10-27 06:43:32+00:00): There is a sign "The end of road" on Yandex panoramas (the link above). Similar sign we have and on the other end of road, before lift-gate.

If lift-gate was open for one time, it doesn't mean that it's open any time - maybe it was the car with pass.
shaveiceberlin (2020-10-25 14:35:38+00:00): Hallo !bm,
die Öffnungszeiten sind wie Du bei b) aufgeführt hast zu verstehen. Wir haben einen fixen Stand, der jedoch nur sonntags über den Sommer öffnet.

LG Ingo & Jonas
!bm (2020-10-25 16:04:16+00:00): Frage s https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92964866
– entsprechend geändert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93020749
M!dgard (2021-01-21 11:41:57+00:00): Hoi, …=designated betekent dat dit een weg betreft waar fietsers een voorkeurspositie hebben en expliciet toegelaten zijn d.m.v. een bord, bv. D7 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Belgium-trafficsign-d7.svg . Voor zover ik de voorhaven ken is dat niet het geval.

Mogen mensen die in de haven moeten zijn hier wandelen of met de fiets rijden ook als er geen fietspad ligt, of staan er verbodsborden?

Wanneer een apart fietspad ingetekend is, komt op de hoofdweg bicycle=no (wanneer er een verbodsbord staat) of bicycle=use_sidepath (wanneer er geen verbodsbord staat).
CyberThijs (2021-01-21 14:35:48+00:00): Hallo,

Bedankt om me hierop aan te spreken. Ik probeer uit te drukken dat je deze straten enkel als fietser mag betreden als je daar "voor beroepsdoeleinden" moet zijn. (Wandelaars zijn sowieso verboden). Is er een manier om dit uit te drukken?
M!dgard (2021-01-23 14:01:30+00:00): bicycle=destination lijkt me dan het meest gepast.
M!dgard (2021-01-23 14:09:57+00:00): De situatie i.v.m. het fietspad snap ik niet zo goed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.33804/3.17971

Ik zie op de luchtfoto's dat er een barrière is tussen de hoofdweg en het fietspad. Maar als je dan als fietser bijvoorbeeld naar de Craeneveltweg wil, dan moet je dus eigenlijk over die barrière klimmen, ofwel het fietspad helemaal niet gebruiken. Klopt dat, of zijn er openingen zodat fietsers van en naar het fietspad kunnen? Die moeten dan namelijk ook op de kaart komen om een correcte routering te kunnen doen.
CyberThijs (2021-01-23 14:45:19+00:00): Alhoewel het misschien niet strikt verboden is voor bestemmingsverkeer, zijn deze wegen hier niet geschikt om als fietser/voetganger te begaan. Ik heb ze daarom aangepast naar foot=no en bicycle=no . De enige manier om je daar met de fiets te verplaatsen is via dat afzonderlijk fietspad.

(cfr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98022958 )

Ik denk dat dit de meest zinvolle invulling is voor routeringsdoeleinden.
Jose Luis Infante (2020-10-23 18:54:10+00:00): Hola,

gracias por tus ediciones.

He arreglado esta edición para añadir la tienda como debe ser, añadiendo información extra. Por favor revisa si es correcta: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8040585255

Un saludo!
user_5359 (2020-10-24 04:37:26+00:00): Hello! Please check the modified way, I delete the non standard tags
Facebook=©
OpenStreetMap=Contributors
RapiD=by
because I assume a copy & paste error.
Josuer (2020-10-24 23:51:51+00:00): Thank you, that is weird. I`m not using RapiD for these tasks. I downloaded the Josm plug in few months ago to experiment with, but not used it since. I will uninstall it, thanks again.
Rainero (2020-10-24 17:52:20+00:00): Hallo santilinares04,
die Adresse des Kathoöischen Kindergartens St. Ignatius stimmt überhaupt nicht. Laut https://www.caritas.de/adressen/kath.-kindergarten-st.-ignatius/81375-muenchen/93204 ist es Guardinistraße 83, 81375 München. Ich korrigiere das mal.

Servus,
Rainer
Leo Slager (2020-10-24 10:03:35+00:00): Dag Riemer17,
Ten Z van de Diemerspoorbrug heb je waarschijnlijk ongemerkt een node versleept.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92965391
Ik heb het even gerepareerd.
Riemer17 (2020-10-24 10:10:29+00:00): Oh oké, dankjewel voor het repareren
Minh Nguyen (2020-11-26 02:00:19+00:00): Hi, thanks for the attention you paid to this part of the map. Changeset 94805058 changes this section of El Camino and The Alameda back to a primary road. I can see how this road might look from the air like a convenient connection between San Tomas and I-880, but I can assure you it’s anything but. A common-sense road classification scheme for the South Bay would classify El Camino and The Alameda the same way as other low-speed, uncontrolled-access roads (such as Stevens Creek and De La Cruz), as opposed to the county expressways (Lawrence, Central, San Tomas), which are high-speed and limited access with occasional grade-separated interchanges.

If you have any questions or concerns, I’d be happy to explain further here, or please feel free to join OSMUS Slack’s #local-ca-sfbay channel, where we can discuss the topic with other local mappers more easily.
santamariense (2022-01-07 22:21:04+00:00): Olá hm7000,
Vi que você adicionou restrições de conversão, porém pela sua descrição do que foi feito nesta changeset, dá a entender que ao invés de ter restrições de conversões, a aplicação da tag oneway=yes na rua Inácia resolveria. Teria mais informações?
user_8466505 (2020-10-23 22:08:18+00:00): Shouldn’t the building be building=hotel?
iandees (2020-10-23 22:48:13+00:00): Yep, feel free to fix it.
◪ Jarv (2020-10-27 14:33:20+00:00): Hilland Road should still be marked as highway=tertiary or highway=unclassified until the bypass is fully opened.
Do you know the date when the bypass is due to be fully opened?
marczoutendijk (2021-11-30 10:59:07+00:00): What do you want to get on the map with: landuse=landuse and source=grass?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863106603
dudone (2021-11-30 19:27:30+00:00): Many thanks for bringing this to my attention.  It should have been landuse=residential, source=bing.  It has now been fixed.
Dudley
Dodko (2021-10-19 17:42:59+00:00): Neviem aký význam malo odstrániť addr:city a addr:place z tejto budovy.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118281938/history
Tam stačilo zmeniť addr:place na mestskú časť Staré Mesto
andrewsh (2021-10-19 17:47:40+00:00): Tá budova má ulicu, takže addr:place nesmie mať.
Dodko (2021-10-19 17:56:57+00:00): Daná adresa nemá pridelenú ulicu ani orientačné číslo, iba súpisné číslo bez ulice.
To robia na garáže, alebo technické budovy.
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/adresne-body/0/19609680?pos=49.085059,19.627098,19

Adresa s ulicou vyzerá takto https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/adresne-body/0/19609681?pos=49.084625,19.626543,19
Dodko (2021-10-19 18:10:38+00:00): Tu je záznam z registra adries https://pasteboard.co/LTdPaZFdBkMl.png
andrewsh (2021-10-19 18:16:17+00:00): Ok, beriem, ale ešte by som skontroloval ako sa tá adresa reálne používa (v listoch vlastníctva, reklame atď) a až vtedy ak nikto to nepriraďuje na ulici Kpt Nálepku, dať tam Staré Mesto.
lectrician1 (2020-10-26 03:35:27+00:00): The amount of houses you've added is insane. Keep it up! I tried looking for building footprints on the City of Batavia and Kane County websites but there aren't any. That way I know you're not wasting your time :)
lectrician1 (2020-10-26 03:38:13+00:00): Also, not to be nitpicky, but could you add dedicated crossings (marked/unmarked) for the sidewalks that cross the street? I know it takes a bit more time, but it's technically more accurate mapping.
mdelatorre (2020-10-24 23:02:13+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM. Your way is not aligned to imagery.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92966864
Glassman (2020-10-23 22:32:06+00:00): Tip: This looks like one building with multiple dwellings. If that is correct, it should be drawn as a single feature and tagged as building=apartments. (Even though they may not be apartments.

Tip: square features by selecting the outline, then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92967195
Amany_Osama (2023-05-30 14:06:18+00:00): Hello cRaIgalLAn;
I noticed you changed the classification of some roads from "highway=track" to "highway=tertiary", there is "tracktype=grade5" and for using "tracktype" the classification should be "highway=track in this case should connect with the nearest streets.
More information about how to use "tracktype"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
Example road:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/649313122
Could you check it and fixed it please?
Regards
Amany_Osama
cRaIgalLAn (2023-06-11 15:04:08+00:00): Hi Amany_Osama; thank you for being concerned about quality of OSM data. 
By your name you're African, probably Luo, so not trying to impose European standards on Africa. 
I hope we can reach a happy resolution to your comment. 
I am guided by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa  
By that guide, most roads in the desert should be tagged as "unclassified" or above as they are not an "Access route from dwellings to agricultural and forestry areas".  The state of the road is not a consideration - only the purpose and use of the route. 
Personally I'd like another classification for very bad rural highways. Above tracks but below unclassified. 
By wealthy (spoiled) European standards a road doesn't need a surface indication, but here in Africa we have some truly bad roads that are important regional routes, so I do use tracktype to indicate that the surface is horrible. For example the Kenyan B4 from Marigat to Kampi ya Samaki is so badly potholed that 5km/h is a good speed. So tracktype=5
However, I have used tracks in the desert (yes, incorrectly) as I try to find the routes using different sets of photos. In many cases the tracks stop where one set of photo coverage stops. Joining all fragmentary evidence of roads to other roads is not yet possible.  I have created similar fragments in the Congo jungles where roads are often hidden under trees.  I hope the fragmentary routes will assist others in building a full set of routes as the photos improve. 
Ok, that's my position. What do you think?
Craig
Amany_Osama (2023-06-12 10:38:41+00:00): Hello cRaIgalLAn;
Thank you for clarifying these points about desert roads and participating to develop the OSM network
but there are errors found on the OSM network on unconnected roads so we turn these roads to be tracks, that made me update the classification and in future as you mention  hope the fragmentary routes will assist others in building a full set of routes as the photos improve
Please check OSM Inspector
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=21.57947&lat=18.02752&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=1.00&overlays=islands%2Cislands_car%2Cislands_bicycle%2Cislands_all
Regards
Amany_Osama
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-23 20:00:45+00:00): Greetings. How come that your changeset stretches across such a huge area?
Tómas Ingi (2020-10-23 20:05:39+00:00): There was a way reaching from Zanzibar to the north pole (not the first time). I just removed the way; I hope that was the only issue.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-23 22:10:40+00:00): I see. Thanks for the clarification. That's quite an unusual issue, and most likely incorrect. Do you have any idea why people map ways like that?
JeroenHoek (2020-10-24 08:13:00+00:00): Probably broken data in the import source.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-25 08:26:41+00:00): Thanks all - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4114 .
Fatma Ali (2020-10-25 12:56:49+00:00): Greetings,  I have seen the comments regarding one of my changesets that buildings in Zanzibar extended to North pole.  I didn't do this intentionally. This could be because I am just new to this kind of technology and not familiar with all the features. I have just started mapping recently but I keep learning everyday to improve myself. 
I hope this clarifies the matter. And thank you all for your comm and promise never to repeat the same mistake again. 
Kind regards.
IpswichMapper (2020-10-25 12:36:53+00:00): Why did you mark this as ptv2? Firstly, you should add all the stops in order before changing it to ptv2. Stops and timetables can be found on bustimes.org
robbob700 (2020-10-25 17:06:27+00:00): Sorry, I had split the route and sorted the ways but not yet added the stops.  I shall ensure in future that I do not setthe PT Version to 2 until the stops are added.