piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2019-09-09 22:31:15+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
me_vij (2019-10-03 13:40:56+00:00): "Hi NURU ATHUMANI_ImportAccount,
Hope you are doing well! 
While reviewing the roads in Bali I came across 
way 583628301
way 583628303
way 583628302
way 583628307
way 583628308
 which has been classified as "track"however while going through the road quality, connectivity and other ways around it is fine to tag this as a "residential" as per Indonesian tagging guidelines.
Please suggest if otherwise.
Thanks "
NURU ATHUMANI_ImportAccount (2019-10-07 09:51:03+00:00): Hi, me_vij
Thanks for your concern.I have already fix the problem, it is true to be tagged as residential as per maxar premium imagery, previously I only used FB Maxar as the main imagery for the project.
Thanks once again.
blackboxlogic (2020-06-04 15:34:51+00:00): I've seen you add `inner=yes` to ways which are an inner member of a relation. I don't think the tag serves any purpose, as the membership's role is what provides the geometry. Am I missing something?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/74248402
Frans S (2019-09-17 14:14:51+00:00): Hello and thanks for mapping.
A remark. you mapped highways as paths despite the width is 3 mtr or more. Track should be a better tagging, (Check also other mappings how they map highways by widening your view by download a bigger part)
Best regards
SimonPoole (2019-09-11 09:17:29+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74343113
trigpoint (2019-09-09 09:41:18+00:00): Hi, this edit has gone a little wrong.

Please stop and think when assuming that residential roads are missing. It is very unlikely that the mapper who mapped this area would have missed a public road.

This is a private shared driveway.
1. It is not shown in OS Opendata Streetview.
2. Imagery clearly shows that the pavement is crossed.

Cheers Phil
karmsudi (2019-09-10 09:15:54+00:00): Hi Trigpoint,

Thank you for looking into my edit. I understand the point you are trying to make and I am completely aligned with your view. As per your suggestion I have made the changes (#74298018). This is a learning for me and I will make use of it in my future edits. Let me know in case there is anything further I can do.

Regards
Karmsudi
rene78 (2019-09-10 12:24:23+00:00): Warum hast Du den Apple Store gelöscht?
amilopowers (2019-09-10 13:40:58+00:00): Hoi René
Dieser ist an den Rennweg 66 umgezogen.
Gruss Ueli
rene78 (2019-09-13 22:28:28+00:00): Sali Ueli
Alles klar. Danke. Bin gestern auch dran vorbeigekommen und hab's gesehen. Entschuldige, dass ich so kurz angebunden war.
Ciao, René
amilopowers (2019-09-14 06:29:57+00:00): Kein problem. Lustig ist, dass die glauben, dass ihr Laden am Rennweg 66 ist, dabei ist er am 43.
Flurps (2019-10-02 13:18:13+00:00): Requested review: This does not seem to be a single building in the latest aerial maps, and as far as I can remember from being in the area.

Since you have mapped it as a single building with 5 levels, it seems to be incorrect. This area can be marked off as a retail area rather, then have the individual buildings and parking+access mapped instead.

Lastly: Does it have a single house number/address? The other details look fine however!

Thanks for the edit!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74251505
jalaska (2019-09-09 11:04:17+00:00): the walkway crossing the Physik Teich is still reachable. so the construction cut off starts a bit further east, still allowing access to  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455058376
tyr_asd (2019-09-09 12:08:06+00:00): Thanks <3
Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74259148
ma-rt-in (2019-09-10 19:45:59+00:00): Hallo,
was genau soll diese Bus-Route AAA Bus XYZ ?
Che98 (2019-09-12 10:32:15+00:00): Hi,
ich glaub da hab ich einfach was hochgeladen, was ich vergessen hab vorher zu löschen
muralito (2019-09-09 17:51:41+00:00): Hola.

Tengo entendido que De los Arcos es claramente un amenity=hospital. ¿Porque lo cambiaste a clinic?
AgusQui (2019-09-21 05:58:30+00:00): ¿Porque agregas bus=yes a las paradas? ¿Porqué le quitas highway=platform a las plataformas? ¿Porque le quitas amenity=embassy a las embajadas?
AgusQui (2019-09-21 05:59:24+00:00): ¿Porqué agregas highway=footway a las plataformas de tren?
MrMoehritz (2020-03-13 10:36:19+00:00): :-)
whb (2019-09-09 11:07:39+00:00): Warum dieser Knick im Weg?
Eine in den Luftraum eines Weges hineinragende Baumkrone macht den Weg nicht kurvig.
Vielleicht solltest du nochmal vor Ort nachsehen.
tyr_asd (2019-09-09 12:01:47+00:00): Ah, sorry. Hatte den Weg falsch im Kopf. Danke für den Hinweis. Ist in https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?changeset=74252224 ausgebessert
4rch (2019-10-21 22:38:18+00:00): Hello Constrado,

you've done some changes to the territorial boundary between Germany and Poland. Can you provide some sources for the changes you've made? As far as I can see the changes don't reflect the actual treaty between Germany and Poland on the delimitation of the seas area: https://www.un.org/Depts/los/LEGISLATIONANDTREATIES/PDFFILES/TREATIES/DEU-POL1989DS.PDF
user_8023523 (2019-10-22 00:53:02+00:00): everythink is super correct : 

http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20170002205/U/D20172205Lj.pdf

http://www.gdansk.uw.gov.pl/attachments/article/2367/Wyznaczanie%20granic%20obszar%C3%B3w%20morskich.pdf

best regards !
pyram (2019-11-05 19:46:26+00:00): @Constrado 
See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=768022#p768022
I think 4rch has the correct source. See Art. 16 and Art. 67 3) of your source.
trial (2022-02-07 18:45:57+00:00): Bonjour, attention vous avez semble-t-il confondu sens unique de bande cyclable et de rue.
Si la piste est dans un seul sens, c'est juste le cas normal. Si c'est un seul côté qui est en bande cycleable, Cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:cycleway
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259940273/history
Ben Harris (2019-09-10 12:34:32+00:00): Note that above I confused "inbound" and "outbound".  It's the inbound carriageway that's closed, and the outbound one is being used for two-way traffic.
user_5359 (2019-09-09 14:36:48+00:00): Hallo! Bitte beachte, dass Du in der letzten Zeit häufiger addr:post_code statt addr:postcode schreibst.
ToniE (2019-09-09 14:41:02+00:00): Argh, oops und danke. Trage derzeit mit OsmAnd ein, da fehlen wohl ein paar pre-sets. Werde das korrigieren, wenn ich wieder auf JOSM zugreifen kann.
Frans S (2019-09-17 14:25:17+00:00): Hello.
Thanks for mapping.. A remark
You mapped a piece of road south - North as a path.  There are wheel tracks (4wheeldrive"?) visible.  Track should be a better option.
Best regards
Martaga71 (2019-10-17 10:23:39+00:00): ¿Estas sí son oficiales del Ayuntamiento y por tanto aparecen como tales en el catastro?
(Vaya doble vara de medir tiene usted...)
s8evq (2019-12-07 21:40:17+00:00): Hello bxl-forever. Would the street Laskouter really be a rural street? (buiten bebouwde kom / hors agglomération). Does that exist in Brussels?
bxl-forever (2019-12-08 08:53:02+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for spotting this.
Indeed, this is a mistake.  I used StreetComplete and must have pressed the wrong button.  Fixed now.
SimonPoole (2019-09-11 18:45:59+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74343113
mavl (2019-10-02 09:36:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 75178838, 75179998, 75177624, 75175920, 75181338, 75182839 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: the deleting of valid data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3185].
Warin61 (2019-09-10 06:01:07+00:00): Multipolygon outer ways cannot share segments. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.98431&lat=-33.91123&zoom=18&opacity=0.56

A google search for the village gets https://www.facebook.com/pages/Gillawarna-Village/167769939899763
ortho_is_hot (2019-09-11 00:10:12+00:00): Thank you for pointing out that error; I have removed the duplicate segments and changed some roles on lines to achieve the desired result in changeset #74331988 (as far as I can tell)
abakus_uploader (2019-09-09 22:31:14+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
chnav (2019-09-09 19:03:26+00:00): Здравствуйте, ничего не удаляйте без основательной причины. Вы удалили дворовый проезд и нарисовали заново, в ОСМ так не принято.
chnav (2019-09-09 19:04:26+00:00): Дворовые проезды обозначаются service.
Сижу исправляю.
Sawan Shariar (2019-09-12 18:30:15+00:00): Overlapping building. need to be more concern about it. Thank you for your contribution .
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-09-09 14:43:36+00:00): tens áreas a se sobreporem nesta edição ;)
rggmapmaker (2019-09-12 13:30:47+00:00): Boas, 

Neste caso são áreas de floresta a sobrepor-se na rede viária, certo? Já estava dantes, aqueles erros antigos... Estive a alterar as classificações de algumas áreas, mas com o tempo vou tentando corrigir essas situações de sobreposição :p
danmactough (2019-09-09 23:48:57+00:00): Hi, eriosw. This edit appears to be unintentional, as it breaks relation 956244 (which contains these relations). I'm going to revert this edit, but please update relation 956244 if I am in error and these relations should be deleted.
danmactough (2019-09-10 00:02:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74284254 where the changeset comment is: Revert bad edit that breaks referential integrity
GinaroZ (2019-09-11 17:19:18+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding the fixme - however it's probably better if you add a note like this to the location as it's more likely to be seen by other mappers :) 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1921623
fkv (2019-10-07 15:13:55+00:00): In diesem Changeset und in weiteren hast du Adressen von Gebäuden gelöscht und auf Nodes verschoben. Das ist eine eindeutige Verschlechterung. Abgesehen davon verstößt du mit deinen Edits gegen den automated edits code of conduct (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct). Ich fordere dich auf, alle derartigen Änderungen rückgängig zu machen, dann jene Seite genau zu lesen und Imports künftig entweder richtig zu machen oder zu unterlassen. Abgesehen davon gehört es sich, lokale Mapper vorher anzuschreiben, bevor man auch nur in Erwägung zieht, an von ihnen mit Ortskenntnis erfassten Daten herumzupfuschen.
santamariense (2019-09-09 16:25:27+00:00): Olá. Estive revisando sua edição. Parece estar tudo OK. Fique a vontade para perguntar sobre qualquer dúvida que tenhas.
Participe do grupo OSM RS no Telegram: https://t.me/osmrs
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74259094
santamariense (2019-09-09 16:25:08+00:00): Como todo o município provavelmente tem este mesmo CEP, parece ok.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74259256
bagage (2019-10-14 11:30:57+00:00): Hello Luuuddooo, il y a du avoir une fausse manip sur le way 95855234. Il y a un attribut building=roof qui a été ajouté, est-ce que tu peux vérifier de ton côté ?
A+ :)
Luuuddooo (2019-10-16 19:21:54+00:00): Ah oui effectivement, je ne sais pas ce que j'ai fabriqué. Merci de m'avoir averti !
dmlu (2019-09-10 10:26:07+00:00): Hi, mir ist aufgefallen, dass das Gebäude [1] als layer=-1 gekennzeichnet ist. Was soll das bedeuten? Falls das Gebäude noch nicht vollständig errichtet wurde, sollte man dies als building=construction mit construction=apartments kennzeichnen.

Gruß
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723124825
SHARCRASH (2020-09-02 13:50:37+00:00): Hi! Obviously you are new and totally are wrong on how to use tags according their definition. I noticed this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169277043/
It was a parking spot and correct but you changed it for a leisure=park, which clearly is not what's on the location. So i would suggest you to read the first steps tutorial for new users and check OSM's Wiki when you want to contribute elements and tags corresponding to a certain feature in reality. Please correct it as it was, in amenity=parking. Thanks for your comprehension!
SHARCRASH (2020-09-02 19:51:57+00:00): Very nice of you to not care about what other users comment in your changesets... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74260249
OK...
dmlu (2019-09-09 16:55:47+00:00): Bonjour, je voulais juste dire que le format pour le code postal utilisé dans OSM (au Luxembourg) consiste de 4 chiffres, sans le préfix du pays (L-….). J’ai corrigé l’adresse du restaurant Faust. 

Merci pour votre participation a OSM :)
Jordi MF (2019-09-09 18:40:58+00:00): Hola,
Gracias por mejorar la base de datos de OpenStreetMap. Desde la comunidad española de OSM hemos visto que has modificado diversas áreas peatonales o plazas para etiquetarlas como leisure=park. Ten en cuenta que en OSM un "parque" es un área grande, con vegetación semisilvestre y donde se pueden realizar múltiples actividades de ocio. Las zonas que tú has mapeado como "parque" no encajan en esa descripción. Realmente, las zonas que has modificado se tratan de áreas peatonales con bancos, alguna zona ajardinada y algún árbol. Por favor, consulta la wiki de OSM donde se describen detalladamente las diferentes etiquetas.

Muchas gracias y te animamos a seguir mejorando OSM.
Saludos,
Jordi
user_5359 (2019-09-27 04:36:14+00:00): Hello! You add on the site https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696888796/history the key web (normally a shortcut for website). But the value isn't any url content. What is your meaning of this key?
ivanbranco (2021-12-22 21:55:01+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723118953

what the meaning of place=*?
StephaneP (2019-09-20 15:00:28+00:00): Bonjour christophe_anto, et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap.

Tu as ajouté des chemins sous forme de pistes cyclables, mais en fait il s'agit de bandes cyclables, qui ne se dessinent pas séparément, mais s'ajoutent sous forme d'information supplémentaire sur la voie principale. Et ces bandes étaient déjà indiquées. J'ai donc supprimés ces pistes cyclables. Si tu veux en savoir plus sur la façon de représenter la cyclabilité dans osm, tu as un résumé ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle

A bientôt
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
tux67 (2019-09-09 14:22:41+00:00): Hallo DIDIOpladen
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Auch hier hattest du ein Review angefordert. Das Access Tag war schon mal die richtige Wahl - allerdings würde das auf alle Wege des KGV zutreffen und müsste private statt no sein. Ich habe jetzt erst mal ein Tor an der Stelle eingetragen, wo ich es vermute - bitte mal prüfen.
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.
Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74263638
DIDIOpladen (2019-09-09 14:43:17+00:00): Genau dort - Hauptsache das meine Komoot-App (iPhone) mich nicht nochmal da durchleiten will oder andere.

Vielen Dank fürs Verbessern!
Gazer75 (2019-10-26 13:38:15+00:00): Please do not add municipality road refs to the normal ref= tag. Use unsigned_ref= instead.
abakus_uploader (2019-09-09 22:31:13+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2019-09-09 15:56:59+00:00): Hello! Please check the access value for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723142004!
sgmamz (2019-09-11 15:07:06+00:00): Hi George,

Thanks for your response. Apologies for the error. I've corrected the access under changeset #74264225

Regards,
sgmamz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74264225
PT-53 (2019-10-13 06:42:26+00:00): Hallo  Dieserrobin,
Du hast diesen Straßenabschnitt
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/723147933/history
- als fertigestellt - neu eingetragen und mit access=no gleichzeitig voll gesperrt.
Ich halte das für falsch.
Es ist üblich, solange die Straße noch nicht für den Verkehr freigegeben ist, die Straße - wie die anderen Straßenabschnitte der Ortsumgehung - mit highway=construction + construction=secondary zu markieren.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Dieserrobin (2019-10-13 06:58:12+00:00): Hallo PT-53,
Danke für die Hilfe. Werde es gleich korrigieren.

Schöne Grüße.
PT-53 (2019-10-13 07:51:50+00:00): Hallo Dieserrobin, 
die Merkmale access=no und motor_vehicle=no sind jetzt "unnötig" und sollten noch gelöscht werden.
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-10-19 15:02:31+00:00): Hallo Dieserrobin, 
löscht Du noch die unnötigen Merkmale access=no und motor_vehicle=no ?
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-10-28 10:06:40+00:00): Hallo Dieserrobin,
löscht Du noch die unnötigen Merkmale access=no und motor_vehicle=no ?
Grüße
PT-53 (2019-11-04 07:29:41+00:00): Hallo Dieserrobin, 
nach dem Du leider nicht mehr reagiert hast, habe ich heute die unnötigen Access-Markmale gelöscht.
Grüße
SimonPoole (2019-09-11 09:16:48+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74343113
SimonPoole (2019-09-11 18:40:11+00:00): This was not actually reverted (which can be seen from the object history), simply a typo when adding the comment.
BrackoNe (2019-09-11 19:10:02+00:00): Thanks for clarification! I was like: "what's going on here?" :)

Thanks for your time!
SimonPoole (2019-09-11 20:30:33+00:00): IIRC C&P was playing up when I wanted to add the comment so I typed the id manually and switched 56 to 65. Sorry.
BrackoNe (2019-09-12 05:36:14+00:00): It's not a problem at all. Thanks once again for your time and for clarification.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-09-09 23:39:14+00:00): Viva, pode explicar esta edição? qual o motivo de isto ser uma atracão turística?
SimonPoole (2019-09-11 09:16:32+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74343113
viloan (2019-09-09 13:55:47+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
KarmaCleaner (2019-09-12 12:38:34+00:00): You deleted oneway in trunks. Why?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74265235
Hjart (2019-09-09 15:07:59+00:00): Bemærk at vores bot https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/autoAWS automatisk flytter vildfarne adresser tilbage til deres positioner i DAR (det officielle adresse register)
Helt Ude i Skoven (2019-09-09 15:22:09+00:00): Ok. Tak for info.
SimonPoole (2019-09-11 09:16:15+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74343113
user_5359 (2019-09-09 15:54:25+00:00): Hello! Please check the relation https://www.osm.org/relation/10019793, you miss the role "from".
ksnghr (2019-09-11 15:24:37+00:00): Hi George,

Thanks for your response. Apologies for the error. I've corrected the access under changeset #

Regards,
ksnghr
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74265431
viloan (2019-09-09 14:12:28+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Dave Venables (2019-09-10 13:27:40+00:00): Calm Yoga https://calmyogastudio.co.uk/pages/contact-location-derby  https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/whats-on/whats-on-news/calm-yoga-derby-3302880
SimonPoole (2019-09-11 09:15:40+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74343113
Martin Borsje (2019-09-10 04:27:34+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.