piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 15:28:57+00:00): I tried my best to explain, but alas, it was half of the picture?, I'm sorry, I tried
SomeoneElse (2022-05-03 15:30:22+00:00): I previously suggested on https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/119761959 that you engage with the Canadian community on the talk-ca mailing list.  I've just replied to a comment at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2022-May/thread.html#10415 , which suggested that rather than doing a "local survey" you've actually just been copying from Google Maps.  I suggest that you engage with the community there and explain the logistics behind your other "local" surveys such as Winnipeg and Thunder Bay.
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:08:19+00:00): Not true, besides I learnt from that mistake, I am not lying
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:09:48+00:00): But ok, I'll accept
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:10:58+00:00): I live in Winnipeg, so I am a local and it just so happens I travelled around Winnipeg and made sure my edits were correct
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:11:38+00:00): I took photos of Street signs
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 17:27:44+00:00): The streets that I edited in Winnipeg are true, and confirmed in Winnipeg before editing
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-04 00:26:04+00:00): Because i live in Winnipeg, you should have more trust on the street name edits there
alester (2022-05-05 21:06:46+00:00): This is not the location of Flute Lane, neither on-the-ground nor in the Stats Can dataset. Flute Lane was already mapped slightly to the north. You've mapped Flute Lane in roughly the spot Google Maps has it, which is wrong and a good indication that you copied from Google.
SekeRob (2022-05-03 16:14:02+00:00): Hi,

What's the function of this broken (import?) line around a section of industrial area?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14099794

You say 'Errata corrige' but the change set indicates with a warning that the line is not closed.

cheers
SekeRob (2022-05-06 08:52:57+00:00): Reminder.

This broken outline with just area=yes persists. What was/is the purpose of this unfinished business?
Was it in error and should it be removed?

cheers
fkv (2022-05-03 15:23:07+00:00): Ich hab mich da noch nie durchs Gestrüpp geschlagen, aber ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass da kein cliff ist. Dieses seh ich weder im Geländemodell noch auf Orthofotos, und vor Ort wäre es mir wahrscheinlich auch schon aufgefallen, und allein von der Geologie her ist es hier gar nicht möglich.
fdemmer (2022-05-03 15:27:35+00:00): ich zitiere wiki: "A  cliff is a vertical or almost vertical natural drop in terrain topography as it occurs for example in form of coastal cliffs or escarpments. The face of the cliff usually consists of bare solid rock but can occasionally also consist of clay, compacted sand, ice or other solid materials - for some materials other than rock natural=earth_bank could be a better choice."

zutreffend für diesen ort:

- almost vertical natural drop in terrain topography 
- occasionally also consist of clay, compacted sand
fdemmer (2022-05-03 15:28:50+00:00): sinn der eintragung ist, dass man dort anders als sonst generell im dem gelände ort nicht einfach grad runtergehen kann und der pfad direkt an der kante verläuft. imho sind das für mapping relevante und sinnvolle informationen.
fkv (2022-05-03 16:34:23+00:00): Das ist aber nicht "almost vertical". Ich traue mich so ziemlich jeden Betrag mit dir wetten, dass ich an jeder Stelle rauf- und runtergehen kann.
fdemmer (2022-05-03 17:44:18+00:00): bist gern eingeladen mal hin zu gehen. treff ma uns, zahlst a bier.
fkv (2022-05-03 18:02:44+00:00): Ich hab dzt. wahrscheinlich öfter Zeit als du. Morgen geht's erst ab Nachmittag, weil ich ungefähr bis Mittag im AKH bin. Auf jeden Fall bräuchte ich deine Handynummer, falls was dazwischen kommt.
martien-176 (2022-05-04 15:53:52+00:00): Hi Melinda, you requested a review of your mappings.

Well mapped but please be a bit more precise when tracing. Do not forget to square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. 

Also to ensure buildings/highways do not cross or connect, zoom right in and carefully place the building corners. If a road overlaps a building you should feel free to adjust the position of the road before mapping the building.

Thank you for mapping. Kind regards, Martien, global validator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120478254
Jessica Lily (2022-05-02 21:08:23+00:00): This is actually from bing, not local knowledge. I had JOSM misconfigured.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 14:27:00+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9710057122/history has guest_house = hotel that was added in this edit
Would it be hotel? ( tourism=hotel - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel )
Guest house? ( tourism=guest_house - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house )

Something else?
Martin868 (2025-05-14 20:15:02+00:00): I am not sure. It is what we call a Pourvoirie, which is a place that provide lodging and other services for people that go either fishing and/or hunting. So it is not really an hotel accommodation in the classic sense, people there are going for the other services. It is not really a hostel. It is not a gest house either. I am open to ideas, I do not really know how to classify this.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-23 12:01:36+00:00): "people there are going for the other services" 

I think it is not a deal breaker

you sometimes have a bit weird hotels with some custom attractions
Lejun (2022-05-05 09:05:17+00:00): Contribution vérifiée et approuvée. Bon travail !
czubi (2022-05-03 09:15:12+00:00): Hallo OBM, willkommen bei OSM, schön das du mithilfst deine Gemeinde zu verbessern. Eine Bitte bzw. Anmerkung. Wenn du einen footway einträgst, dann ist das immer verbunden mit einem Fahrradfahrverbot und das gilt eigentlich nur bei entsprechendem Verkehrszeichen (VZ:239) bzw. wenn der Weg nur als Bürgersteig gewidmet ist. Wenn Radfahren nicht verboten ist dann nimm bitte path. Die anderen Fehler habe ich weitestgehend beseitigt. Die Fehler werden auch immer beim Hochladen angezeigt. Wie z.B. in diesem CS hier disconnectet_ways. Bedeutet der Weg ist nicht korrekt mit einem anderen Weg verbunden. Versuche bitte auch doppelte Hausnummern zu vermeiden, jede HN gibt es nur einmal. Das habe ich aber schon weitestgehend berichtigt.
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-05-03 05:30:19+00:00): Danke! ;-)
Nawfal85 (2022-05-02 21:14:04+00:00): trying to change the shape of the top minaret
yrtimiD (2022-05-06 22:43:08+00:00): vandalism: reverted
andrewwiseman (2022-05-06 20:08:15+00:00): Thanks for the edits. For Yin & Yang massage you should also add a tag for the type of business, in this case https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmassage
theMETAVERSr (2022-05-07 13:54:53+00:00): I am also helping with the proper uploading of this map to Blind Square so not all specific OSM tags work in Blind Square. Thank you for being patient with this process. Can I ask for all the mods in this platform why is the map either not tagged properly or not updated? Ive had some seriously terrible experience here with mods.
clay_c (2022-05-07 15:14:07+00:00): What mods do you speak of? There are no "mods" on OSM.
eggie (2022-05-04 06:40:08+00:00): Dag Fillifera.. Je vraagt feedback

De waterbekkens kun je taggen met 
leisure=swimming_pool
sport=swimming
Dus niet natural=water... 

De zwembadinstelling op de adresnode als leisure=sports_centre sport=swimming
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool

Ik pas even wat aan dan moet je maar eens kijken.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-04 06:50:51+00:00): Tagging aangepast conform wiki 
 A facility containing one or more swimming pools (mainly focused on swimming as a sport) should be tagged leisure=sports_centre + sport=swimming. 

Ziet er verder netjes uit
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-05-03 06:28:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
felipeeugenio (2022-05-03 13:42:22+00:00): Hola Edgardo
El motivo porque el que no agregamos los tags al edificio en estos casos es que, al tener "inners", lo que estás diciendo es que todo es el supermercado menos el inner. Por lo que hay un poligono por fuera con todo.

Actualicé éste con los datos que incoporaste, pero ojo con eso.
saludos y muchas gracias
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120479385
MxxCon (2022-05-03 04:56:44+00:00): URL to a 3rd party website is not a description. Furthermore, this kind of info should go on OHM, not OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120479513
theMETAVERSr (2022-05-05 19:33:21+00:00): there are thousands of historically significant homes tagged here. Please don't be petty about what should be tagged because you and your gang can't keep up with tags and keeping them current and relevant.
MxxCon (2022-05-06 01:42:59+00:00): There's no pettiness here.
I will not let OSM get vandalism by cryptobros like you and other scammers who have zero interest in actually helping OSM by PROPERLY mapping useful data, but instead the only interest is in scamming people out of their money.
FFS! Even your OSM profile is spam for your nft crap!
If you genuinely wanted to add useful data to OSM, you wouldn't intentionally DELETE valid information from the map. You wouldn't knowingly and intentionally add bad tags to the map. You wouldn't intentionally move and mis-position data on the map just so that your software can display labels because you don't know how to properly code it. You wouldn't intentionally add nonexisting features to the map. You wouldn't make crybaby changeset comments like "Don't be petty." or "more trees. need more trees... not enough trees. ". FFS! You don't even bother to add any wikidata or wikipedia tags to those "supposedly" historic places!

Why don't you and your cryptobros stop vandalizing the map and go buy some more of those beanie babies, that'll be a lot more useful.
theMETAVERSr (2022-05-07 13:51:13+00:00): yikes. it amazes me how protective you all are with the terrible job of tagging locations and keeping tags current. We are not metaverse bros. We are investors relying on an accurate OSM map for our investments. I've had to fight to change tags that are 5-10 years old. So yes, comparing all your work on this map, choosing not to tag a significant home in NYC is petty. I am sending this comment to the complaints because of how vulgar it is.
theMETAVERSr (2022-05-07 13:56:46+00:00): nothing i've posted can be considered vandalism. All my tags are current and valid.
emersonveenstra (2022-05-02 21:48:29+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM! Just as a note, on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369939487, multiple values are delimited by semicolons, not commas, so it should be `cuisine=donut;ice_cream`. Would you mind quickly fixing that?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120479525
jesswynne (2022-05-03 01:09:35+00:00): Fixed, thanks for the tip!
ivanbranco (2022-05-03 15:27:03+00:00): Hi dmgroom_ct,

the correct value is atoll, not atol.

(are you sure is an atoll? was mapped as reef before)
dmgroom_ct (2022-05-04 20:01:47+00:00): I have corrected the spelling, the reason i chose atoll rather than reef, is that the way I tagged is the inner way of a realtion which is the reef
eggie (2022-05-03 05:34:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Lijkt me oke... craft rendert overigens niet.. office=company wel shop=printing ook, maar of dat de lading dekt?
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-02 21:34:21+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 117855993, 119032104.
SomeoneElse (2022-05-02 21:59:14+00:00): I can't vouch for either the "before" or "after" state of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13319965 ; only that I re-applied some name:uk that had been removed.
Best Regards,
Andy
eggie (2022-05-03 05:37:25+00:00): Feedback.. Dit is niet correct.. 
Er is al een adresnode gecombineerd met de bedrijftsinfo. Dat is voldoende.
Beter de extra node verwijderen. 

MVG
eggie
C_Schouwenaar (2022-05-04 04:52:39+00:00): Heb net de dubbele node weggehaald. En nog bedankt voor de feedback.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
archpdx (2022-05-03 05:44:36+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Quick tip: use the hotkey 'q' when selecting a building to square the corners.

I highly recommend going through the walkthrough if you haven't done so already as it goes over some useful tips. You can do this by pressing 'h' in the editor or by clicking on the question mark on the righthand menu of the editor and clicking on the map icon that says 'Start the Walkthrough'.

Also, it looks like this edit also covers a Dunkin' location in the Boston area. In the future, please upload your edit before you move to a different area, read this wiki article for more info:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
eggie (2022-05-03 05:39:45+00:00): C_Schouwenaar... Lijkt me oke..
Mapse verder
eggie
abakus_uploader (2022-05-02 22:32:01+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
andrewwiseman (2022-05-06 20:06:59+00:00): Is this the name of this house? A better option might be description= or loc_name if this is a local nickname. You can learn more here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
theMETAVERSr (2022-05-07 13:46:59+00:00): It is the name of the house. I would add a http describing it and being sold as this name, but some OSM mod keeps denying the tag because I can't ass http as a description. How terrible at OSM can y'all be if you don't know the name of historical locations easily verified by internet sources?
theMETAVERSr (2022-05-07 13:47:43+00:00): I'm curious if any of the OSM mods for this area are locals or just protective of their terrible mapping skills?
clay_c (2022-05-07 15:18:20+00:00): Is there any reason you're being so rude and hostile to local mappers who point out problems with your edits? I don't think it's necessary to insult others for following consensus-based mapping practices that we've had years to develop. Since you're new, I would recommend you slow down and learn more about the history of OpenStreetMap, and try to build good relationships with local mappers in areas where you edit.
theMETAVERSr (2022-05-07 15:25:33+00:00): Yes, there is a reason. Because the mappers start off with being rude. And very aggressive. None of my tags are invalid, if anything they lack the specificity that boarders petty... perfect example is Left Field Denim repair shop... it is a shop by name not a clothing store but someone keeps changing the designation. The Branford Marsalis House is the current fight where mapper says these homes are not to be tagged which is a lie because i spent 2 week fighting someone on the Malcolm X home.
theMETAVERSr (2022-05-07 15:28:05+00:00): This home is a valid tag. It is marketed as both the Branford Marsalis House and the GangStarr house. Both as local designations but for real estate. Why this is a battle I still don't understand????
theMETAVERSr (2022-05-07 15:29:21+00:00): FYI... I've had ZERO propblems mapping outside of NY. West coast and Midwest mappers are much nicer.
clay_c (2022-05-07 15:46:24+00:00): I've looked through your changesets and changeset comments, and the only hostility I'm seeing is from you. The rudeness from other mappers looks to be a response to your own rudeness.

When other mappers have disagreements with what you are doing, you need to come to common ground with them and find guidelines that work for everyone. OpenStreetMap has been a community-based volunteer project for a decade and a half. It's essential to get along with others in such a collaborative space. I would recommend you take an approach to communication that is more respectful of other, more experienced mappers, and the substantial amount of time they have spent creating the map you are looking at.
clay_c (2022-05-07 15:50:06+00:00): Also, mappers have been having problems with your work nationwide. As I'm sure you're aware, everything in the US you have changed to shop=yes has been reverted:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120647255
SomeoneElse (2022-05-17 21:17:52+00:00): FWIW, neither name suggested here checks out.  https://duckduckgo.com/?q=%22gangstarr+house%22&t=ffsb&ia=web , https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffsb&q=Branford+Marsalis+House&ia=web .
eggie (2022-05-03 06:47:29+00:00): De verwijderde landuse in het Hertenkamp heb ik hersteld. 
Een tourism=zoo is een functie en geen landuse.  Dat staat  los van elkaar. petting_zoo omgezet naar enclosure. 
Gr eggie

MVG
eggie
heretofore (2022-05-05 14:35:52+00:00): Hi. If you're going to turn traffic island nodes into pairs of one-way streets, can you fix the relations on the roads that now have a one-way segment in them with no return path?
KB-01 (2022-05-05 14:47:56+00:00): I usually make sure to add the new way to all the necessary route relations, yes. I guess I must’ve missed a few.
syntex (2022-09-28 21:21:41+00:00): Obszary typu wood, scrub itp w tym przypadku nie powinny mieć znacznika parku
Mudumala (2022-05-25 13:04:30+00:00): Hi LaMusico,

Trusting you are doing well!

While mapping in this region, I came across this particular node 1700990048 having ‘highway=crossing’ tag to it. Ideally the crossing tag is added for pedestrian crossing or railway crossing. Since it’s a high priority road, can you help us verify if there’s a crossing present? Thank you in advance.

Regards,
Rajeswari.
BCNorwich (2022-05-03 06:35:38+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Very good first effort.

You've got a few footpaths going through the bus station building. It cannot be determined by the present tagging if these paths are above, below, or through the building. 

Please see here the layer tag which determines the relationship of crossing features:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer

Further, this link describes building passages for ways going through buildings:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage  

You can use both of these tags here. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard
rab (2022-05-10 20:43:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/218565834/history

onway?
Eric Geiler - A&B Courier (2022-05-03 19:11:58+00:00): Alignment is still not correct.  Did you visit this area to verify the details?
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:11:58+00:00): I confirmed using Maxar imagery, it is what is used in the in site editor
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:12:19+00:00): It is a verifiable
SomeoneElse (2022-05-03 20:45:56+00:00): Obviously the names aren't verifiable from aerial imagery - or did you survey these
PopeyePopcord (2022-05-03 20:54:41+00:00): i verified the alignment not the names using Maxar, For the names i used https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/92-500-X
Deni Hankin Artist (2026-07-22 13:10:53+00:00): This artist now operates from Church Road
yrtimiD (2022-05-06 22:43:00+00:00): vandalism: reverted
eggie (2022-05-03 06:34:27+00:00): Dag geterind.. 
Het water en de landuse hier zijn een import uit 2011 vanuit de 3dshapes. Die waren een hele vooruitgang, maar nu achterhaald.
Advies is om het voorzichtig aan te pakken en niet alles te gelijk.
Je kunt ook gebruik maken van de BGT omtrekgericht. Alle waterwegen zijn ingemeten. De landuse en het water kun je het best bewerken met editor JOSM.
Met al die multipolygonen is iD minder geschikt. 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 

BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg 

MVG
eggie
maraf24 (2022-05-03 09:08:13+00:00): Mapujemy przez analogię? 
secondary było prawidłowe.
szalona_entropia (2022-05-03 09:34:22+00:00): primary też jest prawidłowe
BeJotEl (2022-05-03 18:53:09+00:00): Hallo cehceh,
deine Änderungen waren an dieser Stelle völlig kontraproduktiv, da die Straße derzeit im Rückbau ist und ich erst vor zwei Wochen den aktuellen Stand, der noch auf keinem Satellitenbild zu sehen ist, eingetragen habe.
Den aktuellen Stand kannst du dir gern via Kartaview ansehen (z.B. https://kartaview.org/map/@51.19360258850298,12.466648357523354,17z).
Ich werde diesen Änderungssatz morgen revertieren, in der Hoffnung, daß dann nicht wieder anhand von veralteten Satelliten-/Luftbildern nicht mehr aktuelle Daten eingetragen werden.
cehceh (2022-05-03 19:36:13+00:00): Hallo BeJotEl,
danke für den Hinweis; sorry. Ich bin über kaputte Relationen gestolpert und war mir nicht im Klaren, dass da aktuell ein Rückbau stattfindet.  Dann mach das bitte rückgängig.
Vielleicht ist es sinnvoll, an solchen Stellen irgendwie einen Hinweis unterzubringen, dass die Satellitenbilder gerade den Zustand gar nicht wiedergeben?
Viele Grüße!
MxxCon (2022-05-03 04:59:34+00:00): Hello.
As I commented in changeset 120417933, please do not map the same features twice, as building polygon and a node. This ambulance station is already tagged on the building itself.
Please see this article for more details:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120480745
wildcatz$ (2022-05-06 02:00:02+00:00): hi,                                                                            
I read your comment and I agree with you about anyone that is mapping to build a node or polygon. I believe that on any map, a building like that should have marked on it. as a fellow mapper, I take you comment with good faith and hope in the future we can work together to create better maps.
MxxCon (2022-05-06 02:20:15+00:00): I'm not sure what map you were looking at, perhaps it has some old cached data, but here on default OSM map style this building shows the name of what it is.
MxxCon (2022-05-06 02:26:16+00:00): Also, having said that, one thing you should be aware of, is that for mappers one of the most important aspect is to make sure that the underlying data is as accurate as possible, and not that the map looks pretty. 🙂
If the data is good, let the different maps worry how to ensure that all the useful and relevant data is displayed at various zoom levels.

It's an incorrect approach to try to intentionally fudge things around just so that it shows up the way you like in one specific map style.
OSM's data is used by dozens if not hundreds of different maps designed for various purposes, and they rely on the accuracy of the data.
If you haven't see this article already, it explains this in a bit more detail: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
👍