piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
A67-A67 (2018-02-02 16:00:23+00:00): Bedankt. Het is altijd fijn om direct van de bron advies te krijgen. Ik heb de gehele gracht nu Westsingelgracht gemaakt en de namen van de bruggen niet meer door laten lopen over de Phoenixstraat.
Peterindelft (2018-02-03 08:36:12+00:00): Ik merk al geruime tijd dat vooral het bereik van straatnamen in Delft op OSM niet juist is (Kampveldweg is bijv, ook te lang, loopt maar tot de fietsersoversteekplaats in het verlengde van de Spoorsingel, west daarvan is Ruys de Beerenbrouckplein, in dat plein zit overigens een fout als je naar het grootste niveau zoomt, er gaan twee poten naar de Heemskerkstraat - ook bij de aansluiting Noordeinde-Wateringsevest ziet het het raar uit en niet volgens het vastgestelde bereik van die namen). Vandaar dat ik zelf aan het bewerken ben gegaan, maar dat is best omslachtig. Is het een OMS doodzonde als ik je om je e-mail adres vraag zodat ik correcties die ik zelf niet kan maken per e-mail doorstuur?
Peterindelft (2018-02-03 08:38:11+00:00): De Wateringseweg en Vrijenbanselaan hebben ook een veel te groot verloop. Misschien kijk ik wel of ik dat zelf aan kan passen, maar ik heb te weinig tijd om me te lang hier mee bezig te houden.
eggie (2018-02-01 19:09:22+00:00): Ik heb hier wat landuse grass en losse bomen toegevoegd.  Leisure=park is alleen een transparante layer die de functie en de naam draagt van een park.
Peterindelft (2018-02-01 19:36:09+00:00): Ik kreeg hier de naam niet geselecteerd en heb onbedoeld mogelijk iets gewijzigd.Ik wilde alleen de naam corrigeren in Olofspark (er staat geen 'St.' voor).
eggie (2018-02-01 19:58:15+00:00): Oke... Dat is dan gelukt. Het enige wat ik hier gedaan heb is de landuse ingevuld die ontbrak. De Leisure=park met naam Olofspark (transparante functie)  ligt er nog gewoon overheen.
Het probleem momenteel is dat de landuse wordt verwijderd en vervangen door die transparanten door Pokemonmappers om het spel te beïnvloeden. Het is dus zaak de landuse te behouden. Je kunt het als voorbeeld gebruiken.
Dit was je edit: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55973612
mapse verder.
eggie (2018-02-01 20:25:31+00:00): Er staat nog een placenode "Olofsbuurt" hier. Die kun je ook een eindje verder zetten. Rendering duurt altijd even.
A67-A67 (2018-02-02 12:50:49+00:00): Heet het fietspad naar de fietsenstalling echt Stationsplein net als de weg naar de Kiss & Ride en geen Houttuinen? Stationsstalling 2 is namelijk op Houttuinen 30 gevestigd.
Peterindelft (2018-02-02 15:48:19+00:00): Houttuinen heet alleen het pad direct langs de gracht. Tussen dit pad en de Coenderstraat heet alles Stationsplein. Ik denk dat stalling 2 hetzelfde adres als 1 gekregen heeft, zo niet dan geef ik dan door en moet het adres veranderen (ik ben lid van de commissie straatnaamgeving van de gemeente Delft)
A67-A67 (2018-02-02 15:56:36+00:00): Bedankt! Ik heb nu het pad door de Stationsstalling 1 ook in Stationsplein veranderd. 
In de BAG staan de volgende adressen:
Stationsstalling 1, Houttuinen 20
Stationsstalling 2, Houttuinen 30
zie ook https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-02 04:09:09+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55973830
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-02 04:11:30+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55973899
scratera (2018-02-01 22:07:40+00:00): cosi va meglio
ciao paolo
portobeseno (2018-02-07 09:31:29+00:00): ciao Paolo, grazie ancora
viloan (2018-02-01 18:28:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-02-01 18:29:10+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
muralito (2018-02-02 15:12:27+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55974180
user_1470980 (2018-02-12 01:39:42+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=684611#p684611
iandees (2018-02-01 23:04:30+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55974272
iandees (2018-02-01 23:02:50+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55974298
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-02 04:12:04+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55974299
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-02 04:14:04+00:00): Looks like there was a YMCA node already, I deleted the original since it looks like you got a better address and more complete information for it.
iandees (2018-02-01 23:03:48+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55974359
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-02 04:13:23+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55974365
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-02 04:14:38+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55974445
Bonix-Mapper (2018-03-23 22:29:34+00:00): blbraga,

Você apagou edificações importadas anteriormente com base em dados oficiais da PMSP.

Era necessário apagar? Você precisa considerar que existe uma diferença de alinhamento das imagens com a realidade. Os dados da PMSP são bem precisos e coerentes quando se juntam aos dados de vias.

Ou seja, um desalinhamento da edificação importada não significa que ela está incorreta.

Além disso o alinhamento muda conforme as imagens de satélite são atualizadas.

Por favor, solicito que entre em algum dos grupos de discussão do OSM no Brasil antes de apagar novas edificações importadas em São Paulo.

* https://t.me/OSMBrasil_Suporte

* https://t.me/osmsp

Talvez eu tente recuperar os dados originais que você apagou.

Atenciosamente,
Mike Baggaley (2018-02-05 19:43:10+00:00): Hi Pete, in this change way 151234397, which appears to be a motorway slip road, has had bicycle=yes added. Is this a mistake?

Cheers,
Mike
Gashete (2018-02-02 19:11:23+00:00): Ya acomode bien
user_5359 (2018-02-01 20:20:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Constable (2018-02-08 10:23:53+00:00): ciao, guarda però che le aree verdi (aiuole) a bordo strada vanno etichettate come landuse=grass, non sono parchi pubblici!
Correggo
user_5359 (2018-02-01 20:20:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2791548608/history.
I have moved the node back to his original position.
user_5359 (2018-02-01 20:16:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-02-09 09:38:21+00:00): Hello. Welcome to OSM! 😁 You asked for a review, of this change, so here it is.

This is all good edits. It's always good to see people looking after their local area in OSM.

You added some houses, did you know that you can press S in the iD editor and it'll make your corners right angeled? That's more realistic and accurate. It's also a good idea to add as much info as you know, like house numbers.

You added a leisure=park, which is more for actual parks. Patches of grass in housing estates is more like landuse=grass

There's a few beginner mistakes where the editor will "glue"/"attach" ways/lines together, but that's OK. I might go through and tidy it up, if you'd like?
Furfur93 (2018-02-09 11:41:32+00:00): Hi! Thank you for reviewing :)

I will try to fix my mistakes so i learn from it.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-02-09 12:24:13+00:00): That's OK. We all start somewhere. 😁 Lots of these aren't "mistakes", they aren't *wrong*. There are just things that could be done better. :)
rskedgell (2020-04-11 14:18:19+00:00): Are the "Private Field" and "Private Land" really the names of these, or just redundant descriptions of information already conveyed by access=no?

If these are private fields within the Syon Park estate, is leisure=park the most appropriate tag for them. They are already within the leisure=park polygon for Syon Park as a whole ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506179582 ). Perhaps access=private + natural=* or landuse=* instead?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/474992303
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557735258
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506124330
EugenyN (2018-02-02 18:02:26+00:00): для тц нужно добавить тег shop=mall. как в других тц в городе.
BisVrn (2018-02-02 23:18:22+00:00): Тег добавлен
EugenyN (2018-02-03 07:07:54+00:00): Спасибо
literan (2018-02-02 10:28:59+00:00): и еще один момент - все пересекающиеся дороги/дорожки/тропы обязаны иметь общую точку
pinkelpause (2018-02-02 20:37:15+00:00): Спасибо за подсказки, постараюсь поправить к понедельнику
pitscheplatsch (2018-02-02 17:19:31+00:00): Hi Sayma, welcome to OSM. 

Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55975384
Your Village Maps (2018-09-23 06:01:51+00:00): Hi.  I just updated these streets to OSM standards:  dropped the "N" (but added "North" for alt_name) and spelled out abbreviations, surface=paved, and removed redundant nodes on straight stretches of ways that have curves.  Your comment says "removing roads"; do you mean removing certain attributes not used by OSM?  Was this done as an import from City and County of Denver GIS data?  Tags says imagery_used = Bing aerial imagery.  Just looking for clarification and information.  Thanks
dpsspatial (2018-09-24 17:09:32+00:00): Hi. The 'N' is a standard in the City and County of Denver data and is becoming important for geocoding purposes. 

These particular edits went through a few uploads/deletes/uploads as the first time I uploaded them through JOSM they were flagged as not appropriate for OSM. However, I've been in touch with several OSM folks in the Denver area and have decided to leave these here. 

I believe its important for cartographic as well as routing purposes to have these new roads added to OSM, but as of yet, have not had the proper guidance to add new roads from the City and County of Denver where Bing Imagery doesn't have them (and cannot be traced). Any thoughts are welcome! -MB
dpsspatial (2018-10-22 21:21:34+00:00): @YourVillageMaps: I'm still confused as to why you traced these streets from Digital Globe vs. adding them from the City and County of Denver street centerlines?
Your Village Maps (2018-10-23 01:32:55+00:00): I didn't, except for the alleys and anything else that was missed (I don't recall anything but the alleys though).
dpsspatial (2018-10-23 14:28:42+00:00): Oh - I was seeing 'digital globe' as the source for the roads I clicked on - must just be lumped in with the alleys. Thanks!
user_5359 (2018-02-01 20:14:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.
Tim Couwelier (2018-02-02 08:01:08+00:00): Welkom!

Je eigen woning is altijd een leuk startpunt.
Laat je vooral niet tegenhouden na te kijken wat je verder kan aanvullen!

Als je twijfelt, kan je ook altijd even aangeven dat je wil dat je wijzigingen even worden nagekeken, en als je vragen hebt, kan je een deel van de 'mappers-kern' terugvinden in dit chatkanaal:
https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org
literan (2018-02-02 10:28:07+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо за правки. Есть маленькое замечание - гляньте как корректно вносить арки (проходы) в домах https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243096928/history - сейчас у вас получилось, что пешеходные дорожки проходят по крышам домов
viloan (2018-02-01 19:41:37+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-02-01 20:12:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
EugenyN (2018-02-02 17:58:09+00:00): Кавычки в названии не нужны. И название неоднозначное. Во многих источниках памятник упоминается как "Пирамида" в тугисе например https://2gis.ru/voronezh/geo/4363557923717150%2C39.181586%2C51.702603?queryState=center%2F39.180352%2C51.702603%2Fzoom%2F18   вообще интересный вопрос.
BisVrn (2018-02-02 23:39:11+00:00): Скорее всего правильное название памятника должно соответствовать его назначению и основному смыслу установки. Известных египетских «фараонов» и «тутанхамонов» в Воронеже вроде бы не было. Да и на многовековую историческую постройку данное сооружение тоже не похоже. Смысл данного объекта вроде бы – памятный знак в честь напоминания о войне (об этом и свидетельствует надпись на одной из граней "Воронеж - город воинской славы"). Поэтому я и решил изменить название. 
Название указано в кавычках, т.к. это не настоящая пирамида (историческая постройка), а скорее сильно распространённое альтернативное или местное название у горожан – это как «чупа-чупс» у ВГУ, или «днк» у вокзала.      
Кстати, в том же 2гисе название указано как - Памятник воинской Славы "Пирамида".
user_5359 (2018-02-02 05:33:35+00:00): Hello! If a lind is part of a relation, you should not repeat the attributes of the relation to this line.
nyuriks (2018-02-02 05:35:48+00:00): @user_5359 thanks for the info. I was following the JOSM's warning about it - should JOSM rule be disabled?
user_5359 (2018-02-02 05:44:26+00:00): @nyuriks: I think you got aline without any tags. And I got a boundary on a not closed way. I assumed: You a working on a relation in different steps, so don't stop before the work is finished. 
And no, never disable a warning rule. The rule doesn't know, that you only store between. These messages can then be accepted. Only at the end of your work the rules should not apply
nyuriks (2018-02-02 09:07:08+00:00): Hi, I am very sorry, I don't understand.  I think Google translate is creating a very bad translation.
user_5359 (2018-02-02 19:24:46+00:00): Unfortunately no Google, I will write a mail.
SHARCRASH (2018-02-02 13:13:21+00:00): Hello! Thanks for your edits and updates! I've checked some of this changeset and i noticed that you edited the way whereas it is still misaligned compared to reality/image sat.. This combined to other services, for example the terrain's altitude, might make a big difference for the practical use. So can i suggest you to try improve also the position when possible, please? Thanks for the considerations. :)
bikedeluxe (2018-02-02 16:48:50+00:00): Hello, thanks for your comment. Can you specify if possible which track(s)/way you mean, because I tried to make several changes concerning MTB-scale. I changed  2-3 times the direction of the way from up- to downhill. I deleted some ways that does not exist. I'm open to every suggestion, please just specify what is wrong.
SHARCRASH (2018-02-02 17:05:23+00:00): I checked your changeset because i like this area and contribute in it as much as i can because either there are missings, mistakes or imprecise elements already plotted. So i was curious, had an eye on your changeset and i just had found some ways that were still not precise in position. Nevermind, i already rectified what i could and added other few things. So i don't have anything specific now to tell you. My previous comment was just an invitation if you can have a closer eye on future edits. Thank you anyway for the efforts! Wishing you a nice continuation! :)
szymo1500 (2018-02-03 08:34:09+00:00): Istnieje również nowa trasa na linii 76: 
z Bramy Portowej na Nabrzeże Ewa przez Logistyczną,
z Bramy Portowej na Nabrzeże Ewa przez Heyki i Logistyczną,
z Nabrzeża Ewa przez Logistyczną do Bramy Portowej

Pozdrawiam
maciek-szn (2018-02-03 17:15:51+00:00): Mam świadomość, zostawiłem to sobie na później :-) Już dodane.
Wilmer Osario (2018-02-06 12:22:42+00:00): Bien / Good
iwhs (2018-11-08 10:52:58+00:00): Note you still have Ashey Road as access=no - haven't been there for a while but it must be re-opened by now...  Mike
user_4081914 (2018-11-09 21:25:55+00:00): that was dm groom not me. i have taken it off cos it must be open now
mweper (2018-02-02 00:14:17+00:00): Hola @JuanVerde. Por favor, corrige esta via desfasada de su lugar. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147477794
JuanVerde (2018-02-02 17:58:23+00:00): Hola @mweper, creo que el problema ya ha sido solucionado por otro usuario. Podrias revisarlo para no hacer nuevos cambios?
gracias
mweper (2018-02-02 19:35:32+00:00): Si, parece que ya lo corrigieron. Había quedado un tramo sin añadir de la relación con landuse=residential y lo corregí recién. Saludos.
user_1470980 (2018-02-12 01:32:47+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=684611#p684611
user_1470980 (2018-02-12 01:36:42+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=684611#p684611
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-02 04:15:23+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55977127
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-02 04:15:10+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55977386
R0bst3r (2018-02-09 11:17:06+00:00): Hallo Aalen1,
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus.
Viele Grüße, R0bst3r
PS: Kleiner Test von OSMCha
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55977452
user_1470980 (2018-02-12 01:44:08+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=684611#p684611
viloan (2018-02-01 21:04:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Guilherme Jorge (2018-02-01 21:22:15+00:00): #pokemon
free_as_a_bird (2018-02-03 20:26:47+00:00): My dear friend,

something went wrong with your edit: please delete the stuff you (accidentally?) added at point 0.0, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557783426

Thanks!