piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ebraplmap (2018-10-24 16:06:26+00:00): با سلام و سپاس از وقتی که گذاشتید و راهنمایی هایی که ارایه نمودید، برداشت شما از منظور من در استفاده از کلمه ترازبندی کاملا درسته و مبنای این تغییرات هم تصاویر ماهواره ای به تنهایی نیست، برای مثال در محدوده سپاهان شهر با اینکه فایل جی پی اکس آپلود نشده ولی با استفاده از لایه Strava cycling heatmap و تطبیق تصاویر ماهواره ای DG (که اتفاقا اینجا نسبتا جدید هم هستند ۲۰۱۷-۲۸-۹) با آن این ویرایش ها انجام شده و همونطور که جنابعالی اشاره فرمودید سعی شده درمواردی صورت بگیره که مقدار جابجایی از عرض معبر بیشتر باشه. لطفا اگر هنوز ابهامی وجود داره بفرمایید. با سپاس دوباره.
Glassman (2018-10-03 23:43:40+00:00): One tip - the outline will look nicer if you square it. Just select the outline in the editor, either type an "s" or right click and chose the square icon. Let me know if you need any help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63172946
Brendan Co (2018-10-04 08:22:35+00:00): @Glassman Thanks I made the suggested change.
Bazaar Review (2018-10-03 20:04:17+00:00): In Bazaa Rreview you will Get The Information about The product. Also you get review of product user, in briefly price of the product, specifications, product in budget, pros and cons, bottom line, live review, info graphic, user manual etc.
freebeer (2018-10-06 05:06:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63248127 where the changeset comment is: destroy spam AAAARGH NUKE KILL MANGLE GRRRR
canfe (2019-02-04 06:59:57+00:00): Il giardino è mappato come punto e come area. Tolto il punto.
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-04 02:08:15+00:00): Looks like that it ended up getting dragged and joined to the Holiday Inn somehow.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63173582
Baloo Uriza (2018-10-04 02:08:16+00:00): Looks like that it ended up getting dragged and joined to the Holiday Inn somehow.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63173582
kiaraSh-Q (2018-10-24 07:11:15+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز، اگه منظورتون از ترازبندی (که توی خیلی از جنجستاتون ذکرش کردین) جانجا کردن عوارض بر اساس تصاویر ماهواره ای و منطبق کردنشون بر هم هست، باید خدمتتون عرض کنم که این کار از پایه اشتباست و تقریباً کار بیهوده ای هست، چون تصاویر ماهواره ای هر چند وقت یکبار یکسری جابجایی های (اغلب جزئی و در حد چند متر) دارن و الزاماً به معنای این نیست که این جابجایی ها در جهت برطرف کردن آف ست بوده... ولی اگه اینکارتون بر اساس فایلهای چی پی ایکس آپلود شده در یک منطقه هست (که البته مثلاً در شهرک سپاهان شهر اصفهان هیچ فایل جی پی ایکسی آپلود نشده که بر اساس اونا بشه تصاویر ماهواره ای رو ست کرد، ولی بازم شما اقدام به جابجا کردن معابر کردین) کار درستیه، البته به شرط اینکه تعداد جی پی ایکس های آپلود شده قابل توجه و مقدار جابجایی دیده شده از عرض اون معبر بیشتر باشه. در غیر این صورت لطفاً از جابجا کردن معابر الی خصوص بصورت موردی پرهیز کنید. ممنون از توجه شما
ebraplmap (2018-10-24 16:06:53+00:00): با سلام و سپاس از وقتی که گذاشتید و راهنمایی هایی که ارایه نمودید، برداشت شما از منظور من در استفاده از کلمه ترازبندی کاملا درسته و مبنای این تغییرات هم تصاویر ماهواره ای به تنهایی نیست، برای مثال در محدوده سپاهان شهر با اینکه فایل جی پی اکس آپلود نشده ولی با استفاده از لایه Strava cycling heatmap و تطبیق تصاویر ماهواره ای DG (که اتفاقا اینجا نسبتا جدید هم هستند ۲۰۱۷-۲۸-۹) با آن این ویرایش ها انجام شده و همونطور که جنابعالی اشاره فرمودید سعی شده درمواردی صورت بگیره که مقدار جابجایی از عرض معبر بیشتر باشه. لطفا اگر هنوز ابهامی وجود داره بفرمایید. با سپاس دوباره.
R0bst3r (2018-10-04 09:40:44+00:00): Hallo kazoolians,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63173970
viloan (2018-10-03 20:45:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
maraf24 (2018-10-07 19:09:38+00:00): Uchwała została wydrukowana w dzienniku wojewódzkim i weszła już w życie?
kotkiller (2018-10-07 20:35:26+00:00): Uchwały zostały przekazane do służb ratunkowych, żeby miały wiedzę o nowych ulicach. Nie wiem czy były publikowane w dzienniku wojewódzkim.
maraf24 (2018-10-07 21:01:27+00:00): W sumie to uchwały są nieistotne:)
Istotne jest, tabliczki z jaką nazwą są przy tej ulicy.
midgardlowsec (2019-01-30 13:30:25+00:00): Je tekent hier de Eeklose watergang in zonder rekening te houden met bestaande sloten: https://framapic.org/vBkOS4fqcr94/tk1ZhKNN0WtQ.png

Pas op met die filters ;)
Nakaner (2019-02-27 13:14:52+00:00): Hallo,

was möchtest du denn mit place=square + surface=sett, aber ohne name=* ausdrücken? place=* ist doch für benannte Objekte da. Wenn es dir um eine befestigte Fläche geht, wäre area:highway=* o.ä. doch besser?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Nakaner (2019-02-27 13:15:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/510162644
Peilscheibe (2019-02-27 13:22:09+00:00): Hallo Nakaner, 
ich möchte hier gar nichts ausdrücken, der Platz ist ja nicht von mir.
Das Objekt wurde in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50553124 angelegt, vielleicht kann der Autor dort weiterhelfen.

Viele Grüße, P.
AndersAndersson (2018-10-04 16:57:10+00:00): En ö är väl en ö även om den inte har något namn?
Essin (2018-10-04 20:30:02+00:00): Fast det markeras redan av att den är inner i multipolygonen. Place-taggarna är till för namngivna platser enligt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:place
AndersAndersson (2018-10-04 20:33:27+00:00): Inner i en multipolygon innebär ju bara att den inte har något värde alls. Som vilket land som helst utan taggar.

Fast egentligen kanske det är lite dumt att ha en place tag som säger att det är en ö. Borde väl kanske vara natural eller något. Lite sent att ändra det nu dock.
Essin (2018-10-05 19:30:14+00:00): Jag förstår inte riktigt, "ingår i en multipolygon och har rollen inner" är väl också en egenskap, även om den inte uttrycks med taggar? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=land fanns förut, men avvecklades för att multipolygoner fyller samma funktion. Det var innan jag hade börjat följa med i vad som hände "bakom kulisserna" på OSM, så jag vet inte hur diskussionerna gick då. Angående place-taggarna tror jag att de är mer lättbegripliga om man tänker sig name-taggen som primär, alltså "Här är något namngivet, vad för något? En ö" snarare än "Här är en ö, vad heter den?"
AndersAndersson (2018-10-05 20:28:39+00:00): Inner i en multipolygon innebär ju antingen motsvarande natural=land, men kan lika gärna innebära att den är skog eller parkering, men har inte fått något värde än.

En ö är ju en geografisk egenskap, som jag kan tycka bör taggas, precis som t.ex en bergstopp (oavsett namn eller inte). Och i dagsläget är det place=islet som är det allmänt använda som bäst beskriver det. Men jag förstår vad du menar.
Essin (2018-10-06 08:04:14+00:00): Hm, inner i en natural=water-multipolygon skulle jag förstås ha sagt.
AndersAndersson (2018-10-06 16:49:20+00:00): Jo, men rent hypotetiskt skulle det kunna vara en fläck med annat vatten som har ett annat namn. Inget säger att det är en ö. Mitten på sjön kallas för "Djupen" och övriga sjön för "Lången" om jag ska hitta på något. En ö är en geografisk egenhet och borde ha en tagg. Men vi löser det inte här, det är mer storskaligt än detta changeset.
eggie (2018-10-03 21:42:15+00:00): Oke.., maar nu is de highway=- tag...   verdwenen. Dus zal de weg van de kaart verdwijnen. 
Dit was je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63175064
eggie (2018-10-03 22:04:20+00:00): added highway residential
RicoElectrico (2018-11-26 13:31:16+00:00): Cześć,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/441498218/history

Ja bym tu zostawił service. To wąski, stromy podjazd. Inaczej GraphHopper tędy prowadzi.
Mister_of_America (2018-11-26 19:08:40+00:00): Witam, jak zmienisz to się nie pogniewam :) Kwestia tego, jak to wygląda potem na mapie. Albo można ustawić, zamiast service, to droga wewnętrzna, może to by było lepsze.
eggie (2018-10-03 21:46:22+00:00): Oke.. foot=yes niet op een voetpad .. dat is default.  access=yes ook weghalen (niet gebruikelijk) 
In het begin is alles abracadabra, maar dat gaat allengs over. Veel vragen en afkijken van ervaren mappers.
Digne (2018-10-04 19:54:34+00:00): Hoi Abri01,

Ik zag dat er om feedback was gevraagd. De foot=yes mag er ook wel af, het is al een voetpad. 

Hier is een overzichtje met standaardwaarden voor verschillende wegen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Netherlands

Bijvoorbeeld foot=yes of horse=no hoef je alleen toe te passen als de realiteit afwijkt van die standaardwaardes.
LeifRasmussen (2018-10-03 21:58:00+00:00): Common sense indeed.
eggie (2018-10-04 06:21:20+00:00): Review.. dag Jeroen.. Het lijkt me in orde zo. Wanneer brommers ook nog uitgezonderd zijn van eenrichting dan nog toevoegen oneway:moped=no
MVG,
Eggie
flohoff (2018-10-04 12:54:02+00:00): Moin Bielebog,

das dingen heisst wirklich Torgauer Straße!?!?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/630375432
bielebog (2018-10-04 15:49:16+00:00): Yup. Siehe https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/r_Dw5JvIHB95BadVWxB9Bw
flohoff (2018-10-04 18:03:25+00:00): Hmmm - Das ist echt komisch. Da steht ein StVO Zeichen - also öffentliche Straße und offiziell Gewidmet - Ist aber als Service drin und so wie ich die Daten sehe kommt du bis zum Tor und dann ist Schluss!?!?

Was ist das denn für ein seltsames Konstrukt.

Hat die Stadt mal die Straße verkauft !?!?

Flo
flohoff (2018-10-04 18:10:41+00:00): Ach ja - OSM hat ja an der Bahn weiter Südlich noch ein stück Torgauer Straße. Der BKG Webatlas kennt das da gar nicht. Für den ist nur das nördliche Stück eine Offizielle Straße.
bielebog (2018-10-04 19:09:13+00:00): Wenn man sich mal eine alte Karte zum Vergleich anschaut – bspw. (¹) – schaut es so aus, als wäre diese Straße mal durchgegangen bis zur Borchener Straße. In den 90ern war hier eine Mülvervrennungsanlage angedacht. Und noch früher war hier oben übrigens mal der Luftpark Mönkeloh²


¹ http://kreispaderborn.maps.arcgis.com/apps/StorytellingSwipe/index.html?appid=48b97a08f17248fdbbacdb76cd77da0f# 

² https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flugplatz_Paderborn-M%C3%B6nkeloh
pio2_122 (2018-10-04 04:36:18+00:00): Wypadałoby zmienić też ulice w adresach.
aharvey (2018-10-04 03:35:55+00:00): I've unglued this park from the road.
aharvey (2018-10-04 03:30:55+00:00): +1 This park is shown in the LPI Basemap and Imagery.
Warin61 (2018-10-07 09:10:16+00:00): If you look you'll find a few missing parks ... No 1 Lucinda Rd is a park on the LPI base map.
viloan (2018-10-03 23:46:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:49:21+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
aharvey (2018-10-04 03:24:44+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

I've reverted this change.
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:49:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:49:00+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:48:45+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
hsimpson (2018-10-04 13:53:07+00:00): Hallo Guelp,

hast du deine Änderungen wirklich vor Ort verifiziert?

Stand 8. Juli 2018 ist die Autobahn immer noch als A44 beschildert, von einer Umbenennung ist nirgendwo etwas zu finden! https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.46090798752475&lng=7.305294895445544&z=17&focus=map&dateFrom=2018-07-01&pKey=yvjJUZpoClPo5bqKvBuKBA&x=0.4999999999999976&y=0.46157843387477976&zoom=1.1440677966101696

Sollte sich das seitdem geändert haben, dann gib bitte an, woher du die Kenntnis davon hast. Andernfalls bitte ich um einen umgehenden Revert deiner Änderungen!

Viele Grüße,

hsimpson
kreuzschnabel (2018-10-04 16:46:52+00:00): Ergänzend sei auf die Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/952866 und im Forum unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60471 hingewiesen. Für OSM ist entscheidend, was an der Straße selbst dransteht, und solange da „A 44“ auf den Wegweisern steht, bleibt das in OSM auch so. Dass die Umwidmung beschlossen ist, ist bekannt, aber wir warten, bis sie an der Straße selbst vollzogen wurde, damit es keine Verwirrung gibt (Navi sagt „Fahren Sie auf die A 448“, Fahrer flucht „Du Dösbaddel, die gibt’s hier doch gar nicht, nur die A 44“).
hsimpson (2018-10-10 09:11:11+00:00): Dieses Changeset wurde Revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63373032 da der User Guelp es unterlassen hat, die Korrektheit seiner erfassten Daten zu belegen und es daran erhebliche Zweifel gibt.

Für weitere Informationen bitte den durch Kreuzschabel verlinkten Forumsthread aufsuchen.

Viele Grüße
FraukeLeo (2023-03-06 22:01:15+00:00): In https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119149651 ist es wieder die A 448 geworden. Am AK Bochum/Witten ist eindeutig noch A 44 ausgeschildert und sonst nix, da bin ich heute auf der A 43 durchgefahren.
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:48:34+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:48:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
nevw (2018-10-04 07:49:02+00:00): Hi, you need to use the correct format for opening hours
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples
Arma IRM-ED (2020-08-03 06:49:21+00:00): Hi Sal73x, I added bridge on highways (way160605620) because it crossed with waterways. Thank you
CmdrThor (2018-10-04 18:45:34+00:00): Hey there,

As I mentioned in my PM to you yesterday, please do not try to change OSM data to get Pokémon GO to behave in a certain way. There are many other users & consumers of OSM data and altering the map can break things for them.
For example, since you changed the footways to service roadways drivers would think they could turn in to the park from Ronald Reagan, which is simply not possible.

For your future reference, service roadways are the lowest priority roadway in OSM, and cars are (generally) considered to be allowed on these ways. Highway=footway is correct for all footpaths within the park, and I have changed them back.

If you haven't already, please have a look over the OSM beginner's guide: https://tinyurl.com/osmbeginners

And the OSM best practices guide: https://tinyurl.com/osmgoodpractice

And if you're not sure on what exactly a tag means, it's always a good idea to double check the wiki to see what values are valid or proper, or if there's perhaps a better tag that can go on the features.


Also as I mentioned in my PM, please feel free to contact me for any question or concern you may have, I try to respond within a day and usually respond within a few hours.

-Brandon
lukeleiapadme (2018-10-04 19:11:30+00:00): Ok. Maybe it's easier to coordinate with you before I make changes. Yes true, OSM isn't exclusive to Pogo use, the other app I've seen it used is Ingress. So are you speaking on behave of Ingress players? If so, you're tagging them for your own benefit for Ingress playing as well.
  Case in point,there was one path which allows vehicle access that was marked footway. That would be incorrect since it'd indicate no vehicle access is allowed.
  The other 2 paths I'd like to change to path: "highway=path is a generic path, either multi-use or unspecified usage, open to all non-motorized vehicles and not intended for motorized vehicles unless tagged so separately. The path may have any type of surface."
  Please let me know if you agree the proposed modifications.
CmdrThor (2018-10-04 20:14:23+00:00): I've never heard of Ingress before, but mapping purposefully for their benefit would not be correct either. Since you've asked; I map purely for correctness and my primary use of OSM data is for offline navigation (Both in cars & while on hikes.) I do not map for the benefit of any particular application or service.

----

For the path that allows vehicle access I'm not sure which path you're referring to. I have been to this park in the past and I do not recall any of the paths allowing cars to drive on them. If a path is used by maintenance or service crews then adding motor_vehicle=private would be a better option as the intended use of the way is still a footway.

----

While footway or path would both work on and be valid for any of the paths in the park, if you read a bit further on the path wiki page: "This tag is used for paths for which all and any of highway=footway, highway=cycleway and highway=bridleway would be inappropriate or inadequate." Since the primary use of the paths in the park is as pedestrian paths highway=footway is the more appropriate tag. (Though, arguably bicycle=yes could be added to the ways as well.)

If you do end up changing the footways to paths, I won't edit them back as like I said either tag would be valid, however footway is still the better tag to use.
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:48:14+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:48:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator5 (2018-10-17 13:47:51+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
aharvey (2018-10-14 05:50:53+00:00): Glad to see that City of Melbourne imagery being used. For the toilets to the west, if that whole building is toilets you can drop the node and just add all the tags on the way.
Rhubarb (2018-10-14 08:15:20+00:00): Cheers :)
The building in the west seems to be a club house (didn't note it on my last survey of the place). Though it does have toilets accessible to the public out of hours.

Also, City of Melbourne imagery is awesome!!! :D
Wright One (2018-10-06 01:39:10+00:00): Reverted at changeset #63246449: Multi-storey buildings must be positioned at its base, not its roof.
mueschel (2018-10-12 09:19:46+00:00): Hallo
kannst du uns das Tagging von diesem Knoten erklären? Da stimmt irgendwas nicht.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5952870255

Danke, Jan
vichada (2018-10-12 16:02:42+00:00): Hi Jan,
sorry that was a copy&paste error btw selected wrong object and paste - error.

Thanx for noticing - already fixed it ...
literan (2018-10-04 10:50:03+00:00): Снова удаление информации, здесь потеряна информация о том ,что это лазертаг-арена. Причем вы опять не отвечаете на предыдущие сообщения.
literan (2018-10-04 10:50:20+00:00): Здесь 100% некорректная правка, откатываю
osmviborg (2018-10-04 06:25:44+00:00): Please don't move the address nodes.
Addresses in Denmark are imported from an official database and maintained automatically.
Spongilla (2018-10-04 17:01:03+00:00): Sorry, I know that the adress nodes in Denmark are imported, and in normal case all adress nodes lay exact above the building of this adress. In this case the adress node was originally put on an empty plot without a building. Now a building was build on this plot and I put the adress node on the place where the building was constructed. Now the adress node lays about 10 m aside the  building. Is this right and better?
osmviborg (2018-10-04 17:25:38+00:00): Eventually the node will put in the right place, just a matter of time.
Hjart (2018-10-04 17:35:05+00:00): Unsuspecting newbies regularly drag random adressnodes several hundred meters (when trying to pan the map while clicking one), so the import bot has to move all adresses back to their positions in the government database. The correct action is to correct the position in the government database. Moving imported adress nodes in OSM is futile.
ChehrehBargi (2020-06-10 06:22:32+00:00): با سپاس از وقتی که آقا بهزاد عزیز برای طراحی می‌گذارند، تقاطع مقدس اردبیلی و خیابان تاکسی‌رانی ، یک مسیر هست و رفت و برگشت جدا ندارد.
از توجه شما به بهسازی نقشه اردبیل تشکر ویژه داریم
SimonPoole (2018-10-04 19:13:57+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63206958
user_3022894 (2018-11-29 09:50:27+00:00): Hello shadty,
in this changeset, you removed this way here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286721848 - may I ask you where did you get that from, that there would be no physical road? There have been construction workings but they are finished since begin of 2018, and why shouldn't there be a road?
Pleas also look at this note which was created: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1601444 saying there would be a road...
user_3022894 (2018-12-01 20:36:19+00:00): I do not know where you have taken the data from, so I and another user added the missing road part again.