piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2015-09-07 09:10:52+00:00): It's not (just) about "damaging the database" - it's about communicating what's happening.  If someone extracts data or makes a map from OSM, it's helpful for them to know when there's a wholesale change to something that they might have been expecting.  

Also, if a mapper is adding e.g. "amenity=fitness_center" they'll continue to do so until someone tells them that what they really means is "leisure=fitness_centre" (and explain why it makes sense for people to use one tag when describing the same thing worldwide).

In addition, very often a portion of things that were tagged a certain incorrect way have other errors (e.g. in this case missing building tags) or might be not make sense at all, and be more of a typing error than a mistagging.
Aury88 (2015-09-07 09:54:22+00:00): I perfectly agree with your reasoning about the communication with the user.
My reasoning was that the odds are greater that users who use the old tags have already done for the areas of their knowledge, while new mappers will not be misled by the presence of that tag.
For the extracted data and maps-makers  I (probably wrongly) thought that replacing a tag with another more accurate / specific and  (already before my changeset) more widely used would not cause problems to them.
I was in doubt to add tags or correct the wrong ones but I preferred to restrict the changeset as much as possible because already touched many elements (> 500) and in an extended area.
I did not want to introduce too many changes at once that could make difficult to read the changeset (thus the explicative comment and the note on the changeset). what do you advice?how should I proceed?is it necessary a revert?
SomeoneElse (2015-09-10 18:25:39+00:00): I don't think that it's necessary to revert (from amenity=fitness_center to leisure=fitness_centre isn't a change of meaning, just fixing a typing error), but I'd certainly recheck the items in the changeset.  If someone's got one thing wrong then they might have got others wrong too (for example, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254447913 looks like it is missing a building tag).  I'd also explain to mappers who are still current mappers what you've done (in a polite and friendly way), so that they know what the correct tag is and will use it next time.
Minh Nguyen (2015-09-12 01:32:09+00:00): Can you point to consensus about amenity=fitness_center being incorrect (despite the preference for UK spelling)? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gym_/_Fitness_centre is very ambivalent on this point, and until this changeset, amenity=fitness_center was one of the more popular options. A public awareness campaign should’ve taken place ahead of this change.
Aury88 (2015-09-12 07:43:34+00:00): Hi   Minh Nguyen,
The linked wiki page said "The leisure tag is for places people go in their spare time, which is how most people use a gym." the use of amenity is due to an "overloaded with this tags in the early years of OpenStreetMap".
The use of  leisure=fitness_center/centre tag was already growing  and It was the 2nd most popular tag (after leisure=sports_centre + sport=fitness) already before this changeset (amenity=fitness_center/centre was the 3-4th ). 
Although abandoned by most mappers it still deceive /confuse due to the relative wide presence  caused by the early years of mapping where there was no appropriate tag and the  amenity tag was used for almost anything.
Also it was widely used to not compete with the leisure=sport_centre (or center) tag, although redundant/conflicting, only because leisure=sport_centre is rendered (in josm, in potlatch and in mapnik) and leisure=fitness_center/centre is not. This plus the wiki pages ambiguity also suggests that  leisure=fitness_centre was a wrong key.
Yes! definitely I would have to better manage this change, but I still feel it a change for the better that will help mappers to choose which tag to use instead of having 6-7 confused/redundant/US spelling/wrong alternatives.no ill will on my part.
having made changes by hand on "only" 560 elements  I foolishly thought that there was not need to use the automatic edit procedure based on consensus/ask by mail to single users/etc.I repeat myself, if you feel it was something improper/wrong I'm more than willing to ask a revert. Actually I'm looking for a way to contact all the  touched elements latest publishers to warn them of the change and explain my pov (hoping at that point not to get a ban for spam xD ). Do you know how to do that?How can I have a list of involved and active  mappers?
I think I know how to download all the elements and recheck/correct other tags but I would avoid if a revert is needed.
Aury88 (2015-09-12 09:09:20+00:00): sorry. the amenity=fitness_center/centre was the 4-5th most used tag in the wiki page list . the 2nd amenity=gym was (yet) the 3rd the leisure=fitness_center/centre was (yet) and sport=fitness (+ leisure=sport_centre) was (yet) the first
Minh Nguyen (2015-09-12 17:30:37+00:00): No worries, I’ve been known to get ahead of myself too, and it’s clear you had good intentions. :-) At this point, maybe the best course of action is to send a message to the talk@lists.openstreetmap.org mailing list. (Or post a diary entry.) Explain the change you made and the reasoning above, and offer to help change individual POIs back if for some reason any exceptions should have been made. That should help to get the word out and offer people an opportunity to agree or disagree.
AndersAndersson (2015-09-07 10:27:38+00:00): Hej!

Namnet är väl Liljansvallen, och sporten är bandy. name=Liljansvallen och sport=bandy borde väl räcka? Annars blir det lite som att skriva name=Stockholm - huvudstad.
Bandyakademin (2015-09-07 11:36:10+00:00): OK! Borde räcka!
literan (2015-09-06 20:53:22+00:00): задублировал Якиторию, откатываю
eggie (2018-06-17 12:29:30+00:00): Na jaren weer gaan mappen.. daarom opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
OPerivar (2015-09-07 21:01:15+00:00): In OSM werden Straßen auch nach ihrer Verkehrsbedeutung getaggt. Wenn es construction so sehr stört, ist es jetzt in service geändert.
naoliv (2015-09-12 03:10:30+00:00): From where did you take this data?
Rockus (2015-09-24 17:09:16+00:00): Hallo fussel323,

könntest Du bitte auch hier (wie bei Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33810581) Angaben zur verwendeten Quelle machen?
ij_ (2015-09-07 18:33:39+00:00): Kuis sä nyt poistit sen kylän sit? Se on eri asia kuin suburbi.
Nakaner (2015-10-22 19:39:14+00:00): "(stillgelegt)" ist kein Namensbestandteil. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
mavl (2015-09-06 18:27:09+00:00): Hello.
Sorry, I don't know German language.
Thank you for information.
Restaurant really has name «Terem'ok» (in English language)? Maybe «Теремок» (in Russian language)?  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3731492077  
Here:  
http://www.ishimprice.ru/index.php/2010-02-11-14-29-13/2010-05-07-16-19-15/849-qq-  
«Terem'ok» is a cafe, but not is restaurant.
What about:
amenity=cafe  
cuisine=regional  
name:en=Terem'ok  
name=Теремок
?
Wasslow (2015-09-07 06:58:22+00:00): Hello
Thx for your information.
I visited the restaurant on 28. July 2015 and the dinner was very good. The restaurant is on the ground/first floor. On the first/second floor is a pool table.
The name in russian is: Tepem'ok and in en: Terem'ok. I don't know the meaning of this expression.
mavl (2015-09-07 10:18:04+00:00): Thank you very much for an explanation.

About the word «Tepem'ok» (Теремок). «Tepem'ok» this is the name of the russian fairy tale for children. Also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terem_(Russia).

About the position of the node of this POI. I offer to move this POI inside of a building (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112307616), because the restaurant is inside this building.
BeKri (2016-08-03 13:36:12+00:00): Servus ludwich,
da stimmt was ned ...
An manchen Building:parts ist ein
building:levels=white eingetragen.
JOSM meint level und white passt ned und ich glaube, da hat er recht ...
Ich weiß aber nicht, was Du gemeint haben könntest.
Gruss derBeKri
ludwich (2016-08-04 15:32:57+00:00): ich bin immer noch nicht fertig, das schnapp ich mir aber bald.

Grus ludwich
mavl (2015-09-06 18:42:54+00:00): Здравствуйте.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/278348222
Это неудачное обозначение магазина. «Магазин» это не название (name=Магазин). В теге name нужно указать название магазина (если оно есть), то есть имя собственное (например, Магнит). http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  
Также для магазина нужно добавить тег shop (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:shop).
mavl (2015-09-06 18:31:55+00:00): Здравствуйте.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3731591105
Это действительно колодец (а не колонка, например), который обслуживает Горводоканал?
SnowManTobolsk (2015-09-07 04:21:07+00:00): Это колонка. Знать бы как её обозначить
mavl (2015-09-07 05:07:10+00:00): Специального обозначения для колонок нет, но можно использовать amenity=drinking_water
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Ddrinking_water

Например, http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1800667698.
zors1843 (2015-09-06 19:54:33+00:00): Is het stuk weg voorbij het kruispunt met de Nieuwstraat nog Terheydestraat, of Gehuchtstraat ?
zors1843 (2015-09-06 19:58:12+00:00): Voor flitscamera's : zie wiki :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dspeed_camera
Mvg
paulbiv (2015-09-06 18:27:31+00:00): Survey expedition on Mapillary http://www.mapillary.com/map/s/m7q1KaQD6ZvdsHZPaO-5yQ and http://www.mapillary.com/map/s/OVEK_jSOwNFaySOeCs5slg
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-09-06 13:24:52+00:00): Invalid data should not be kept as "example for wiki"

Just copy tags, list them and make screenshot.
RicoZ (2015-09-06 13:41:41+00:00): there must be a way how to link a specific version of an object but I can't see it - can you help?

Btw besides fixing this one bridge I have intended to contact the author of the unlucky mechanical edit causing this because there are a few thousands of bridges with layer=-1 in Italy. It is surprising to see how long they lasted without anyone noticing.
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-09-06 14:54:56+00:00): "there must be a way how to link a specific version of an object but I can't see it - can you help?"

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Overpass_QL#Attic_data_.28.22date.22.29

In that case it would be http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/bjc (note that map rendering is for current data)

"there are a few thousands of bridges with layer=-1 in Italy" - ops.
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-09-06 14:56:05+00:00): or simply http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/37264089/history
RicoZ (2015-09-06 16:02:37+00:00): thanks. I was also looking at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37264089/history but does not seem to have the possibility to link a specific version directly. 

So the overpass query seems like the only way to get a stable pointer.
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-09-06 16:36:42+00:00): Such feature may be (or already is) requested at https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues
RicoZ (2015-09-06 16:48:42+00:00): Indeed, it has been requested already - https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/issues/662
SekeRob repair (2024-12-02 15:25:49+00:00): Hi marcoSt

Since I see you're still mapping, a question about this oddly shaped wall that you mapped 9 years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369367345/history
I was mapping some road details, added a parking, a footway, moved the Lidl POI over the building when noticing. The wall criss-crosses over the Lidl supermarket which seemingly was mapped by you at the same time. Is it some artifact, an historical object that no one can see anymore, or like here, the city put thick glass in the pavement so you can see what's below... watching relics while shopping :o))). Maybe it needs moving to layer=-1 or has a better place in Open Historic Maps (OHM). One end node is connected to the building i.e. must have had a purpose.

No hurry, just curious, which is known to kill cats.

cheers.
marcoSt (2024-12-02 21:53:23+00:00): Hello SekeRob repair,

Thanks for your information. I really didn't know what I have drawed at that time. Maybe the Bing pictures were a little bit different than today. That is what I can imagine. 

I have tagged many buildings in Rome at that time which they were not there. And I cannot remember all details. 

Sorry, I don't reallly know where the wall comes from.

If the wall does not exit in the reality, you can delete it, now.
SekeRob repair (2024-12-03 16:05:35+00:00): Thx for your reply. I've 'razed' tagged a building and that wall to be sure that no one will remap it using PCN 2012 again as I saw recently in an edit. Added ways and parking to make it semi 2024.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159887055

Tried it in ID editor for a change but by Jove, found no functions that can make a series of nodes on a bend way into a smooth curve. Must exist though since I see ID edit users with long high node count create the smoothest arcs in ways.

cheers.
GOwin (2015-09-12 08:46:30+00:00): If the actual building geometry is not determined from imagery, do not "guess-timate" the building. A POI to represent the feature is good enough.
tyr_asd (2015-10-01 07:35:58+00:00): Hi! Das surface-Tag hier http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369371631 sollte wohl ein source oder operator tag sein, oder?
Polarbear (2015-10-06 18:18:42+00:00): Hallo Chrisss, du hast hier, und in mindestens einem Dutzend weiterer Changesets wohl großflächig sehr viele Felsen des Elbsandstein von natural=peak auf natural=rock umgetaggt? 

Gibt es dazu eine Diskussion, eien Konsens?

Ich konnte weder im Forum noch in Mailinglisten etwas dazu finden.
Chrisss Gü (2015-10-07 11:08:14+00:00): Hallo

Ich sehe ein, dass ich vielleicht vorher jemand hätte fragen sollen, deshalb könnte ich das wieder zurücktaggen um sich dann in einer anschließenden Diskussion sich für natural=rock oder natural=peak zu einigen. Das von einigen eingebrachte Arument, dass man natural=peak nehmen solle, weil es dann auf Mapnik gerendert wird, sehe ich nicht ein, da das Tagging für den Renderer ist. Dafür solle man Spezailkarten wie http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dclimbing#Renderer nehmen.

Für mich gibt es einen Unterschied zwischen einem Berggipfel (Fichtelberg/Gr. Winterberg) und einem Felsen/Klettergipfel/Kletterfelsen (Barbarine/Bloßstock/Onkel) in der Sächsischen Schweiz, weshalb ich dafür plädiere, diese unterschiedlich zu taggen, dafür finde ich auch natural=rock passend. Dies hat zum Beispiel zum Vorteil, dass Wanderkarten, die die einzelnen Kletterfelsen nicht darstellen möchten, Berg(gipfel) jedoch schon, differenzieren können.

Viele Grüße
Polarbear (2015-10-07 11:43:13+00:00): Wir diskutieren das gerade auf der talk-de Mailingliste https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2015-October/111947.html und auf der Wiki-Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:natural%3Dpeak#natural.3Drock_vs._natural.3Dpeak, vielleicht kannst du dich beteiligen.
Polarbear (2015-10-08 08:48:42+00:00): Danke für den Eigen-Revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34491237
Gumeg (2015-09-09 14:58:34+00:00): Осторожнее с правками! Отсоединили съезд с дублера шоссе Энтузиастов от Магнитогорской улицы.
mweper (2015-09-06 17:01:10+00:00): Hola rocelefer. Por favor, etiqueta correctamente este nodo para que se muestre correctamente en el mapa.

Mira aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity=school
vespax (2015-09-09 03:47:59+00:00): It appears this way used to be a one way but is no longer.  Some of the signage along the way is confusing.  There is also an old cement section of road parallel to Caracasbaaiweg.
Rom1 (2015-09-10 08:34:21+00:00): To witch street name do you associate the house number 103? La Digue de Rochebonne? Thanks
michitux (2015-09-11 20:54:14+00:00): Yes, at least the house number is at that side, I've just added that information, thank you for the question. The house numbers seem to be a bit strange on that street. Either some of the houses (27-41 in particular) have two house numbers or the mapped numbers are wrong. House 27-29 on Chaussee du Sillon have all 27 on La Digue de Rochebonne which fits with the 41 that is already mapped for La Digue de Rochebonne. I only noticed that shortly before I left Saint-Malo so I couldn't check that.
Rom1 (2015-09-24 07:22:34+00:00): I've discussed with a person working in townhall of Saint-Malo. The house number 103 is not used aymore. I've added a note (in french). The address of this house is 2, rue des Épiettes.
Cowboy79 (2015-09-06 17:00:45+00:00): Ich fass es nicht! Jetzt ist es auf einmal 'ne Linie statt 'ne Fläche??? Das hab ich überhaupt nicht gemacht, weiß gar nicht, ob man eine Fläche einfach in eine Linie verwandeln kann. Bitte rückgängig machen!
Sorry!
5m4u9 (2015-09-08 05:55:31+00:00): Thank you for your note, I added internet_access
GITNE (2018-08-10 12:28:47+00:00): Hallo Bob,

Woher kommt der Name „Alt-Siegen“ eigentlich? Dieser Name stört mich schon lange, da dieser Name nirgends offiziell verzeichnet ist. Wenn überhaupt, dann deckt sich dieses Gebiet mit dem Bezirk „Siegen-Mitte“, denn diesen gibt es tatsächlich neben anderen, festgelegt in der Gemeindesatzung. Das sind echte administrative Bezirke, mit Bezirksausschuss und so. Ich würde das gerne ändern, was denkst du?
Bob (2018-08-12 08:28:38+00:00): Hi GITNE,
aus Wikipedia bzw. der Hauptsatzung müsste das sein, wo die Bezirke definiert werden. In der Satzung werden die Ortsteile mit aufgezählt, wenn ich mich richtig erinnere. Ich habe jetzt mal Siegen draus gemacht, so wie es auf den Ortsschildern im Straßenraum steht.
GITNE (2018-08-12 16:15:20+00:00): Gut, das ist deutlich besser, denn das entspricht eher der OSM-Faustregel „Was auf dem Schild steht, stimmt“. Und, es nicht so irreführend was in der Wikipedia steht. Ich habe keine Ahnung wie der Autor auf Wikipedia auf den Namen „Alt-Siegen“ gekommen ist. Der Name ist einfach in keinen Urkunden, Dokumenten oder auf Schildern verzeichnet. Danke für die Korrektur/Verbesserung!
NicolasDumoulin (2015-09-07 07:54:49+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour cette contribution, mais il manque les attributs sur le chemin créé :
highway=footway ou highway=track pour le classer en chemin piétons (étroit) ou chemin large
bridge=yes + layer=1 pour dire que c'est un pont
Merci
matt_ellery (2017-06-05 12:05:44+00:00): Hi Dan, I first want to say that I'm impressed by the amount of work you've done around the Horsham area over the last few years. 

Apologies for commenting on an old changeset but I have noticed that you have occasionally used the "name" tag to contain details that really should be in separate tags - for example the Pavilions in the Park doesn't need "(Leisure Centre)" after it as this is already handled by the tag leisure=sports_centre. Name should only include what the object is called: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
glaucoh (2015-09-06 17:58:32+00:00): Trail measured by GPS/GLONASS, while running.
Supaplex (2015-09-07 02:31:33+00:00): Hi 保長坑訓練中心算是一片區域，並不是整片都建築，我把建築tag拿掉，畫出區域內的各別建築

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33845315
user_6110846 (2017-08-30 21:54:17+00:00): у Малинському районі ви безпідставно понизили статус доріг . Дорога що йде через село але при цьому з єднує інше село є ункласифіед . Дорога через житловий масив ЦЕ НЕ ТІЛЬКИ РЕЗИДЕНТІАЛ
_sev (2015-09-06 18:47:43+00:00): Звідки там можуть з'явитися highway=living_street? То є вулиця, яка позначається знаком "Житлова зона". Я змінив на highway=residential
user_2842609 (2015-09-06 19:36:38+00:00): lol 3andek en haq :D hahaha
abdeldjalil (2015-09-06 19:48:48+00:00): Abu Jahl why clean official name and you remplace by unofficial name ??????? Look in another country russia in russian spain in spanish middle east and tunisia and morroco in arabic. look in this page: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algérie , official name is arabic and also kabyle language is national language.
numide (2015-09-07 00:58:41+00:00): nik rabak nta w officila language, it is also said that it is democratic and popular, you are a harki working for daesh, nike yemek
abdeldjalil (2015-09-07 18:11:57+00:00): I do not work for Daech !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Why you said this ??????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
numide (2015-09-07 18:43:59+00:00): You are obsessed with arabic language, we are algerians not arabs, we use three languages, look, i'm fed up with you, go drink camel's urine instead of undermining our work, official language is for analphabet like you, all ministries use french, i will not lose my time,
abdeldjalil (2015-09-07 18:57:54+00:00): Why you said this "go drink camel's urine instead of undermining our work" ??!!! hram 3lik !! Now I stopped editing towns names and i want to add more place .
numide (2015-09-07 19:00:15+00:00): go edit palestine, syria or irak
abdeldjalil (2015-09-07 19:14:36+00:00): No , i'm from Algeria exactly from Ouled Yaïch, Blida, good luck
numide (2015-09-07 19:17:09+00:00): but your mind is in the middle east...I know blida people, they are not as close minded as you...fin des messages
Andreas Wesch (2015-09-06 19:09:36+00:00): Descrição de alteração equivocada. Correção: "Alterada a palavra "Unisociesc" para "UniSociesc"."
SomeoneElse (2015-09-14 22:50:56+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Just noticed you've mapped what looks like a gliding club clubhouse as a military airfield.  That's more usually used for things like RAF bases such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/219355109

For clubhouse buildings, building=clubhouse is used a bit (see e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289370686 ).

Cheers,

Andy
andrewpmk (2015-09-06 21:26:26+00:00): Please use shop=variety_store for Dollarama and other dollar stores.
marc__marc (2021-02-20 15:09:43+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369427395
what's the meaning of sport:boules=no ?
Regards,
Marc
malenki (2015-09-08 17:52:35+00:00): PS: Here are the waypoints I collected during the holidays:
http://malenki.ch/OSM/data/Waypoints_Wales_summer_2015.zip
malenki (2015-09-12 15:21:03+00:00): The region with my images on mapillary:
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/JRKSJXGjcEzKr5iJ2o2Ifg/map

Since you don't have or want to name your sources, don't even want to discuss the issue in public and deleted data I contributed I revert this changeset of yours.
malenki (2015-09-13 19:44:14+00:00): FYI: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=43151
JeSe-MX (2015-09-07 01:18:06+00:00): Se hace una atenta invitación a no crear vías falsas, y usar "relaciones" para crear rutas.
Javierpf (2015-09-10 12:15:02+00:00): Hola, varios usuarios que seguimos este sitio estamos notando que se estan agregando escuelas. Está buenisimo que se haga. Queriamos ponernos en contacto con el responsable de la iniciativa para darles unos tips de cómo hacerlo correctamente.
¿Tenes el contacto de quien coordine esta iniciativa?
Gracias.
Catalina Gaitán (2015-09-07 12:13:37+00:00): La biblioteca Popular 9 de Julio esta ubicada sobre calle Juan de Garay
Alecs01 (2015-09-07 07:19:04+00:00): Ciao, perchè stai chiamando ogni strada forestale o sentiero nei boschi con il nome del comune dove si trova e quella strana "H" davanti? Dubito che si chiamino veramente così; se non hanno nome, non se ne indica nessuno, semplicemente
woodpeck_repair (2016-01-13 23:31:55+00:00): Edits in this changeset have partly been reverted or modified in 36561697 after complaints to DWG.
naoliv (2015-09-08 00:12:14+00:00): Marcos, você removeu o nome de Ituiutaba
Marcos Medeiros (2015-09-15 19:37:03+00:00): Acho que foi um engano logo corrigido
Marcos Medeiros (2015-09-15 19:37:35+00:00): Na, verdade fiz um recortar e colar...