piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-05-10 08:24:28+00:00): ahhh .. ik zie dat je met josm werkt!
SenV2312 (2017-05-10 09:17:19+00:00): ...sorry voor het ongemak maar ik moet het allemaal nog leren ;-) 
Als JOSM makelijker is zal ik mij daar op concentreren
eggie (2017-05-10 09:43:45+00:00): .. nou.. josm heeft een steile leercurve, maar via het forum kun je hulp krijgen. Maar josm is natuurlijk geen verplichting nu.
gormo (2017-05-09 14:13:55+00:00): Hallo, wieso hast du das Striegelhaus wieder weggenommen? Steht das da nicht mehr?
diboehme (2017-05-09 17:35:35+00:00): Die Defintion "Gebäude" und der Zuweg "Pfad mit Brücke" trifft nicht die Wirklichkeit.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:00:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
maxerickson (2017-06-23 10:23:52+00:00): Hi-

For some reason the name and various other tags of the airport didn't get copied over to the relation you created. I guess if you are adding details to airports that is something to keep an eye out for. I've fixed it.

Max
carciofo (2017-06-23 13:44:26+00:00): Hi Max, thanks for the fix! I probably relied on the JOSM tool to create the multipolygon but forgot to verify the results. Cheers! :-)
eggie (2017-05-09 18:20:35+00:00): Dit is echt een hel groot gebied waar je veranderingen aanbrengt. De kans is groot dat je het overzicht dan kwijt bent.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48526618
eggie (2017-05-09 18:22:25+00:00): Is de naam echt bospad/ruiterpad? Die naam haal ik er even af.
eggie (2017-05-09 18:23:37+00:00): omgezet in bridleway en losgemaakt van landuse.. verbonden met omliggende wegen.
eggie (2017-05-09 18:24:58+00:00): Aan de bovenzijde loopt het nog dood
SK53 (2017-05-09 11:31:39+00:00): Hi Luke,

Many thanks for adding this info to OpenStreetMap. I have a few suggestions which may make the edit more useful:

1. There are several buildings on the site. Presumably the original Harston Lodge is the house in the centre. Individual buildings can be mapped and addresses added.
2. We have a tag craft which could be used to add information. You could use craft=guitar_repair instead of/or as well as office. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft#Craft
3. The driveway to Harston Lodge is currently marked as a track (mapped by someone passing on the main road). It looks to me that it could perhaps be better mapped as a driveway (tags highway=service, service=driveway) which would also mean better routing for any one who wished to find your premises via OSM.

This is quite a lot of different things, they should improve the visibility of your business on OSM and OSM-derived apps & maps. However, I'm interested in tapping into your local knowledge, and am willing to help out. OSM thrives by having this kind of local detail.
RoterEmil (2017-05-10 08:05:10+00:00): Hallo 'thominator', nur eine kleine Frage: stimmt die PLZ 04886 für die drei Häuser in Neusorge? Ich finde in den Tiefen des www die 04860, was aber nicht zwingend richtig sein muss. Auf welcher Basis hast Du die 04886 gewählt? Danke und schöne Grüße :)
Athoss15 (2017-05-14 14:16:33+00:00): Szia!

A Pest megyei piros áthelyezéséhez mi volt a forrásod? Gödöllőn nagyon jó helyismeretem van, a piros sáv az Ady Endre sétányon fölül megy a házak mellett, majd csak a zebránál megy át a zeneiskolánál.

Lásd: https://www.google.hu/maps/@47.5920466,19.3529215,3a,75y,330.12h,77.91t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1syxx6Wai0D8Fxn-Zi-5Ovcw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.hu/maps/@47.5952771,19.3497874,3a,62.7y,222.82h,78.43t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1slsF8DUopsQvWlyW2SYDi1g!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Athoss15 (2017-05-14 14:28:12+00:00): Illetve a P+ az Isaszegi útnál a zebrán átmegy az út túloldalára, azt is javítottam
Domcsi (2017-05-14 16:40:27+00:00): Innen vettem:
http://turistautak.openstreetmap.hu/turutszerkeszto.php?id=137,138
Akkor lehet hogy hogy a beküldő tévedett.
Ahogy elnézem a gúglihoz képest is sokat változott a környék:
http://turistautak.openstreetmap.hu/index.php?mapillary=o8tmIjxVUskYCvUCz9M95A
Athoss15 (2017-05-14 19:35:54+00:00): Tényleg van néhány változás, felmértem az új jelzéseket, és feltöltöttem Mapillary-ra is.
Domcsi (2017-05-14 22:25:44+00:00): Itt úgy nézki mintha a Martinovics utcán menne a Piros sáv:
http://turistautak.openstreetmap.hu/index.php?zoom=18&lat=47.59068&lon=19.34602&layers=0B0000FTT&hlat=47.59067&hlon=19.34517&mapillary=Jdss1eJmj1Vie5LDB9xMJw

A P,P+ fonódásnak nem sok értelme van és a Honvéd utcában nem is látszik piros sáv.
Athoss15 (2017-05-15 13:39:56+00:00): Úgy tűnik, tényleg arra megy, a Török Ignác utca-Ady Endre sétány sarkán lévő piros jelzést is lefestették.
Domcsi (2017-05-15 14:37:23+00:00): Átraktam a jelzést:
http://turistautak.openstreetmap.hu/index.php?zoom=16&lat=47.59373&lon=19.35068&layers=0B0000F
@JP (2017-05-09 10:27:18+00:00): 最近オープンしました
桜山ジェラートLoopを
記載しました。
GinaroZ (2017-05-09 10:48:31+00:00): This is clearly not a park, and therefore it has been removed. Please do not add features which are not present on the ground.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-12 10:15:45+00:00): Uważaj na przyszłość - na Karmelickiej (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22424924#map=19/50.06870/19.92696&layers=N ) nie ma asfaltu.
mavl (2017-05-09 11:55:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Названий типа «Магазин» лучше избегать, потому что это не название, а вывеска на магазине. Названий у маленьких магазинов часто нет. Если это просто текст с вывески, то лучше использовать другой тег, например  inscription=Магазин.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:inscription  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  
  
Значений shop=yes тоже лучше избегать. Лучше указывать что-нибудь более определённое (bakery, convenience).  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:shop?uselang=ru]
geri-oc (2017-06-29 15:20:19+00:00): Have the multipolygon corrected and overlapping lines shifted. JOSM has a validator exam.
Set the tip in the background:
DigitalGlobe Premium aerial photography
BING aerial photography

Greeting Gerd - geri-oc
geri-oc (2017-06-29 15:31:15+00:00): Please consider only as a hint / tip.

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=15.82859&lat=57.57925&zoom=12&opacity=0.63

https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=sv&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch295=1&ch296=1&ch297=1&ch298=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&ch20=1&ch60=1&ch300=1&ch360=1&ch390=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=45131728&highlight_schema=101&lat=57.59197&lon=15.85027&zoom=13&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C170%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C412%2C413
emj (2017-06-30 07:22:00+00:00): thanks for fixing, I would never have returned here.
bxl-forever (2017-05-12 10:03:31+00:00): Hello,
Apparently, you have made several tag fixes on the database to add FR+NL names when necessary.
This is a good idea but please look more carefully.  For instance, on Athénée Royal d’Auderghem (way 159325527) you have changed the website into a weird "http://www.arAuderghem - Oudergem.be" string.  And I have seen occurrences of you translating unilingual strings such as name:fr or name:nl
Also, it would be better to use something better than "Update tag" for every contribution, so that the other participants can see what you have done.
Thanks in advance and happy mapping.
Markus366 (2017-08-25 13:39:26+00:00): Dieses Restaurant soll mitten auf der Kreuzung sein ??? Bitte verschiebe mal den Eintrag!
Markus
eggie (2017-05-09 16:04:04+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
user_5359 (2017-05-09 16:53:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I can’t find the street of your address nearby.
GinaroZ (2017-05-09 11:22:19+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. Thanks for the edit however you've only added a named node but without any tags. If there are two bus stops you should add two nodes tagged with highway=bus_stop on either side of the road.
SomeoneElse (2017-05-09 12:36:33+00:00): Thanks for fixing!
MMN-o (2017-05-10 06:48:00+00:00): Hej avaricious! Jag noterade att du ändrade "Traktorväg" till "Gångväg" (track till footway). Om det är en gammal bilväg känner jag spontant att den borde vara bred nog för fordon att köra - och då borde det nog fortfarande vara en "track".

Vad tror du?

Tack för ändringen i alla fall, hoppas du tycker det är kul att kartlägga!
saintam1 (2017-05-25 15:56:18+00:00): Привет Incendium,

(Можете на русском ответить)

I think parallel ways should only be used when the two sides of the road are physically separated, e.g. like this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IMG_2238_-_Clara_Barton_Pkwy_at_NSWC_(looking_east).JPG

There's been a lot of discussion of this and this seems to be the consensus: https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aopenstreetmap.org%20dual%20carriageway

Also, please notice bus line relations: this changeset broke bus 102: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/536928#map=18/42.67461/23.30594

Всего доброго!
PT-53 (2017-05-09 13:38:22+00:00): Hallo Cherub,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz - wohl versehentlich - einen Knoten aus der Gemarkungsgrenze zwischen Aulendorf und Bad Schussenried gelöscht (Siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2186463543/history) . Ich habe diesen wieder hergestellt.
Bitte achte darauf nichts aus Versehen zu löschen.
Ansonsten noch ein Willkommen bei OSM.
Grüße aus dem Landkreis Biberach
PT-53 (2017-05-09 13:45:12+00:00): Du hast ja den Editor JOSM benutzt. In diesem kann man die amtliche Karte Maps4BW (Siehe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW) im  Menü Hintergrundbild einblenden.
Vergleich mal den Verlauf des von Dir eingezeichneten Weges mit dem Verlauf auf Maps4BW.
PT-53 (2017-05-09 14:00:40+00:00): Hallo Cherub,
in diesem Änderungssatz hast Du einen path eingezeichnet. Ein path ist ein Weg, der nicht von zweispurigen Fahrzeugen befahren werden kann. Ein Ausschluß von zweispurigen Fahrzeugen ist daher unnötig. car=no wäre sowieso falsch.
Hier kannst Du sehen, welche Nutzungsrechte bzw. -beschränkungen bei den einzelnen Highway-Typen impliziert werden: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#German  
Nur davon abweichende, durch Verkehrszeichen geregelte Nutzungsbeschränkungen müssen / sollen expliziet eingegeben werden.
Mit dem Verkehrszeichen-Tool (http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/) kannst Du durch anklicken der entspr. Verkehrszeichen die passenden Access-Tags anzeigen lassen.
Bitte paße Deine Access-Eingaben noch entspr.an. Danke.
Grüße
gormo (2017-05-10 14:41:14+00:00): Danke für deine Bearbeitungen! Du hast "step.condition" verwendet, meinst du "step:condition" mit Doppelpunkt? Solche Subtags werden eigentlich immer mit Doppelpunkt geschrieben. Und kannst Du die Toilettenanlage noch mit "toilets=yes" oder/und http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets markieren? Das wäre dann die große Königsklasse :-)
gormo (2017-05-10 14:42:13+00:00): Okay, hab das Klo gefunden. Danke!
bielebog (2017-05-10 15:00:01+00:00): step.condition ist schon richtig. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Steps_features#Step_condition
Das hat im Wiki wohl irnkwie nie den Sprung vom proposed feature geschafft.
GinaroZ (2017-05-09 11:46:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits. If you know the surface of these paths you could that as well :)
mavl (2017-10-02 16:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
eggie (2017-05-09 18:51:21+00:00): Cees.. op een woonerf Gasthuissteeg hoeven geen accestags
Commodoortje (2017-05-10 03:19:06+00:00): Kijk hier om te zien wat de standaard tagging per wegtype is in Nederland.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
Thundercel (2017-06-05 12:14:14+00:00): Prezado Marcão, meu nome é Marcio, username no osm Thundercel. Andei corrigindo algumas edições deitas por voce as quais faço alguns comentários: 1 - a TAG REF de rodovia não deve nunca ser inserida no campo name. Ela sempre é inserida no campo REF e quando existirem duas ou mais REF para um mesmo trecho elas devem ser separadas por ponto e virgula. 2 - Não sei o que houve, mas na sua edição ficou um longo trecho da BR-265;BR-369 como ponte e onde não existe ponte (bridge). Também não compreendi o emprego de layer=1 nesse trecho citado. É certo que empregamos layer=1 quando de bridge, mas somente onde realmente ela existir. 3 - no trevo da Av Joaquim Tres Pontas com a rodovia incluiu voce um acesso que não existe e fez cruzamentos de vias sem conexões. Andei corrigindo tudo que vi e que apontava como erro no validador JOSM, mas existiem muitas outras coisas mais a serem corrigidas na cidade. Um forte abraço e qualquer duvida que eu saiba responder, só perguntar.
mavl (2017-10-02 16:01:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
bielebog (2017-05-09 20:09:06+00:00): Hmm, Auto umgeparkt?
Mal ehrlich, diese Daten gehören nicht nach OSM, is' klar, nicht? :)
Nakaner-repair (2017-05-10 20:19:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 48573481 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 48529598 (personal, temporary data which does not belong into OpenStreetMap). Please use umap.openstreetmap.fr
eggie (2017-05-09 16:04:44+00:00): PB gestuurd als welkom
eggie (2017-05-09 16:08:54+00:00): Je hebt van een voetgangersgebied een highway service gemaakt.
Is het niet gewoon higway=pedestrian met als uitzondering delivery ?
eggie (2017-05-09 16:15:44+00:00): Ik heb het teruggezet naar wandelzone, want dat is het. met uitzondering van bedieningsverkeer.
Jan Nieswaag (2017-05-10 06:59:51+00:00): Eggie, oke, wat ik graag wilde is ook het een richtings verkeer opheven.
maar dat is nu weg. Bedankt,
Jan Nieswaag
mavl (2017-10-02 16:01:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
ravalim (2019-04-29 13:33:32+00:00): Hi IwanHr,

Trust you are well. While working on Jakarta came across your edits where these ways
way 30066555
way 590057309
way 492336548 are marked as "Tertiary", but as per road quality and other ways around it seems to be "UnClassified".

Making necessary changes as of now. Please revert back if it is otherwise.

Thanks in advance.
mavl (2017-10-02 16:01:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
user_5359 (2017-05-09 14:58:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please verify, that these highway https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184166907 is the Chevy Street.
mavl (2017-10-02 16:01:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
sander79 (2017-05-09 13:08:09+00:00): Hoi, de tags 'atmotorway' en 'motorway_direction' komen mij niet bekend voor. Staat dit ergens op een wiki beschreven ?
AdVerburg (2017-05-10 08:18:02+00:00): What tags are these?
Where is this documented?
PTT (2017-05-10 10:44:56+00:00): the 'atmotorway' was proposed at the wiki, and used a little bit in germany, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dfuel
I gave it its own wiki page too: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:atmotorway

I added the motorway_direction tag there last year, and now thought to just add it to a bunch of gas stations to see if it could be useful for rendering.
AdVerburg (2017-05-10 10:55:43+00:00): Now I see. Thanks for your information.
eggie (2017-05-09 16:16:29+00:00): PB gestuurd met Welkom
eggie (2017-05-09 16:19:16+00:00): Alleen een naam is niet genoeg op een adresnode. Daar hoort nog de aard van het bedrijf bij met evt website en Phone. 
Zie wiki in welkomstmail.
eggie (2017-05-09 16:20:47+00:00): shop=beauty toegevoegd
eggie (2017-05-09 16:23:28+00:00): + 3176 521 93 02 en website
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
Владимир К (2017-05-10 12:02:14+00:00): что-то вы непонятное сделали.
почитайте для начала https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9A%D0%B0%D0%BA_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D0%BE%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%87%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%8C , пожалуйста
chillly (2017-05-10 13:19:58+00:00): HI,
Tidy after an import? Where was this import discussed? Are you aware of the guidelines? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
GinaroZ (2017-05-10 16:28:04+00:00): Looks like the school grounds are from OS OpenMap Local according to the source https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/492338815
SomeoneElse (2017-07-19 13:31:35+00:00): My personal experience of the various bits of OS OpenData (trees, water, buildings) is that "trees" were basically rubbish (there are probably some trees in the area, but you can get a much better idea of exactly where from Bing+survey), "water" was pretty good, if a few years out of date (which often isn't a problem) and contained some "cartographic effects" e.g. near roads, and "buildings" was a very very rough approximation indeed.  I'd be keen to see a diff layer such as https://a.os.openstreetmap.org/layer/gb_os_sv_diff_2015_11_2016_04/9/254/166.png is part of TBH.  That's one of Firefishy's OS OpenData layers; as far as I'm aware no-one's done anything similar with OS OpenMap Local.
polar7 (2017-05-09 12:43:51+00:00): Uchwała XLVI/794/VII/2017 RMP z dnia 4 kwietnia 2017 r.
mavl (2017-10-02 16:02:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
SomeoneElse (2017-05-10 14:10:56+00:00): Hello Rowland,
You've not added a changeset comment here, so it's difficult to understand what's going on.  Also, what does "created by=Tayberry" mean?  Is that something that you've used to import or otherwise process this data?
Please do use meaningful changeset comments so that other mappers know what's happening, and if you are doing any sort of import, you really do need to read and follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import and the links from it before continuing.
Best Regards,
Andy
Dani CS (2017-07-16 17:44:03+00:00): Has cambiado highway=proposed a highway=pedestrian, pero este paso aún no está abierto al público. También has añadido lit=yes pero aún falta el alumbrado.

http://www.ideal.es/granada/pasarela-peatonal-pajaritos-20170714024407-nt.html
Jotaele_ (2017-07-16 17:51:55+00:00): Cierto, pensaba que se había inaugurado y parece que aún no.
Dani CS (2017-07-16 17:56:55+00:00): Echaré un vistazo los próximos días por si se mueve algo. Vivo al lado.
Dalkvist (2017-05-11 09:19:21+00:00): Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre. 
Det är mycket att sätta sig in i början, några kommentarer/tips:

Tror översättningen i ID editor som du använd inte är 100%, path används till mer än stigar.
Vi brukar bara använda footway på ställen där det är skyltat med bara gångväg, på gång- och cykelbanor brukar vi använda cycleway och foot=yes eller path med bicycle=designated och foot=designated. Finns lite exempel i wikin[1]

När man lägger in vägar/stigar är det viktigt att de ansluter till vägnätet om det ät glapp så hittar inte vägbeskrivningsprogrammen på den. Ex från Perenna parken norrut till Hantverkaregatan.

Hör gärna av dig om du har några andra funderingar.

[1]https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Highway_tagging_samples/urban
karitotp (2017-05-09 16:38:36+00:00): Hi, welcome to Openstreetmap and thank you for contributing. 
You added many ditches and parks (as nodes and as polygons) on this area, i cannot verify them by satellite imagery, could you confirm if currently those exist?  Let me know if you need any help.
Karito
mavl (2017-10-02 16:01:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
carciofo (2017-07-07 13:46:46+00:00): Hi there, thanks for your contribution. Are you sure this road exists in reality? Was this an on-the-ground observation? Thanks
FlipsideZA (2017-07-09 21:35:50+00:00): Hi, yes 100% sure. I walked the road, and watched many cars and taxi's drive into this road from the main road.
mavl (2017-10-02 16:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52565941 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48336094].
eggie (2017-05-09 18:36:44+00:00): In case there is a parellel cycleway there is no need for tagging cycleway=track. It's even not allowed to cycle here. I will change it. You are welcome for any questions.
eggie (2017-05-09 18:36:57+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=48531729
eggie (2017-05-09 18:41:51+00:00): removed cycleway=track
eggie (2017-05-09 16:25:19+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-05-09 16:38:40+00:00): 'k heb het village_green even van de parkeerplaats gehaald en de trappen op de parkeerplaats laten aansluiten voor de routering.
eggie (2017-05-09 16:40:18+00:00): De parkeerplaats is nu ook routeerbaar