piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2018-08-10 13:25:15+00:00): Unless the building has a name, we don't add personal information to OSM to protect people. You should delete the description and name to remove personal info. Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61518474
ralley (2018-08-30 06:45:42+00:00): This changeset seems to have tagged the entire length of the river as being a culvert, did you just mean to tag a section?
Diógenes de Sinope (2018-08-13 02:59:09+00:00): Hi moviebuffAS, I noticed that you changed the restriction of the following node in this changeset from 'no_left_turn' to 'no_right_turn' (that was actually wrong, but as I will describe in the following, the restriction on the node was wrong to begin with)  - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4328313491#map=20/-8.81130/13.25542&layers=G, reviewing the changes that you made to my prior edits in this changeset allowed me to realise that I made a poor choice in representing the correct restriction at the junction where the aforementioned node is located, the restriction along this way prohibits the execution of 'U-turns' at this junction from Rua Ndumduma heading west to the same heading east via the small portion of road connecting the two, I erroneously represented the no_u_turn restriction by designating the 'nodes' at this junction with a 'no_left_turn' restriction, however, left turns 'are' permitted at this junction (for those leaving Rua Ndumduma to enter 'Cristiano dos Santos'), although, as mentioned before, what is 'not' permitted are 'U-turns' (the following hyperlink shows a Mapiliary image of the same street, just a little further along) https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=rZVMcY6ruwN8U_9bE0z0xQ&focus=photo&lat=-8.81115719666667&lng=13.25273875138896&z=17 (if you consider all of the possible manoeuvres that can take place at this junction, you will figure a node is poorly suited to correctly represent the no_u_turn restriction that is in force at this junction), ultimately, I used iD's 'relation:restriction' tool to properly designate what the street sign instructs the driver not to do and the same for the opposite direction https://i.imgur.com/hUkb4kf.png, I wrote this comment because I thought it was something you should be made aware of
moviebuffAS (2018-08-14 07:26:26+00:00): Hi Diogenes,

I accidentally changed the turn restriction when i was reversing way 57913624 . Thanks for catching that i have changed the parking lane on way 57913624 back to being on the right side of the road per imagery.
moviebuffAS (2018-08-14 18:26:12+00:00): Oops, the way ID is actually 579413624
Warin61 (2018-08-14 01:27:15+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

The Forsyth Park boundaries are shown in the LPI Base Map - these are the legal boundaries of the park. Outer areas might be seen as part of the park, but legally they are not. They can be legally part of the road verge or some other thing. Probably still a council responsibility, but not part of the park.
Warin61 (2018-08-14 01:43:01+00:00): Oh, 
The change set comments .. not the best .. 
please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
jc86035 (2018-08-10 14:39:45+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Please avoid copying from copyrighted maps without permission (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-08-15 18:55:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61694579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some features allegedly mapped from a non-licence-compatible source (shortly to be remapped from imagery)
SomeoneElse (2018-08-15 19:04:15+00:00): ... and I've remapped this green from imagery in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61694769 .
jc86035 (2018-08-15 19:04:59+00:00): Thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-08-15 18:55:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61694579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some features allegedly mapped from a non-licence-compatible source (shortly to be remapped from imagery)
user_5359 (2018-08-11 17:47:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
DD1GJ (2018-08-10 06:37:04+00:00): Hallo street-hunter, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Beachete bitte, dass Google keine zulässige Quelle für OSM ist. Weitere Informationen findest Du im Tutorial. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
unwanted (2018-08-10 07:11:42+00:00): Ich bin dort auch schon einmal vorbeigegangen. Es ist definitv eine Hofeinfahrt.
DD1GJ (2018-08-10 07:19:22+00:00): Das glaube ich Dir. Aber erwähne dann bitte nicht Streetview als Referenz.
Ewen Hill (2018-08-10 12:27:35+00:00): Are you sure this is the correct location?
Hjart (2018-08-10 08:03:52+00:00): Hej
Jeg har slettet dette punkt idet Byggebilligt ellers kommer til at fremstå dobbelt på kort og i søgninger
vakantieland dot nl (2018-08-10 07:53:00+00:00): Excuus, ik was mij van geen kwaad bewust. Ik zie nu dat er in de online editor na de tags inderdaad ook nog relaties verschijnen.
Is dat de locatie waar ik ook rekening mee dien te houden, of is er nog meer?
dvdhoven (2018-08-10 08:17:10+00:00): Je moet nooit doorverbinden, Dat moet de grondregel zijn. Er zijn zoveel routerelaties in OSM op zoveel plekken dat doorverbinden een grote kans op schade aanricht.
Dus niet een specifieke locatie, maar nooit, never, nooit.
In ID kun je relaties niet goed zien en ook niet herstellen, ID en Potlach vermoorden relaties. Pas als je met JOSM werkt, kun je relaties zien en ook herstellen
Maar het beste is dat je nooit wegen door verbindt.
vakantieland dot nl (2018-08-10 08:29:04+00:00): Ok, nooit doorverbinden. Frustrerend gereedschap zijn dat ID en Potlatch zolang e de relaties vernielen. Bij onverenigbare Tags weigert het te verbinden, en de relaties worden niet zichtbaar gemaakt laat staan geavalueerd.  Kan ik met JOSM wel meerdere lijnen selecteren en daar eenzelfde tag aan toekennen?
dvdhoven (2018-08-10 08:52:35+00:00): Ja, JOSM is eigenlijk DE editor voor OSM. Daar kun je zoveel mee doen wat je met ID en Potlach niet kunt. Zoveel dat ik ook lang niet alles weet en gebruik.
Maar je kunt meerdere wegen tegelijk selecteren en er een kenmerk aan toevoegen. Je kunt ook selecties maken op basis van een bepaalde tag. 
Nou ja de mogelijkheden zijn zeer groot.
Alleen het begin is altijd lastig, JOSM heeft een steile leercurve.
Zie ook dit topic in het forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
vakantieland dot nl (2018-08-13 08:31:10+00:00): JOSM maakt het zelfs mogelijk om alleen way-selecties in te laden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API/Sparse_Editing Helaas worden die ways geladen inclusief de onderliggende nodes. Vervolgens alleen een selectie van de ways (zonder nodes0 maken lukt mij niet.
user_5359 (2018-08-10 13:33:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic key payment:credit_cards / payment:debit_cards . This key should normaly only be used for negative value.
mueschel (2018-08-11 09:59:37+00:00): Hi,
please make sure all the tags use the correct spelling - the slightest mistake makes them unusable for any software.
Could you fix these:

roof materials  ->  roof:material
wall materials  -> building:material
-
name=residential house
Please don't use such names. The name  tag is for the actual name of an object, not for an description.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-08-15 18:55:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 61694579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some features allegedly mapped from a non-licence-compatible source (shortly to be remapped from imagery)
Kai Johnson (2023-01-01 17:42:39+00:00): I know it was a long time ago, but when you added the "Kumeyaay Highway" name to sections of I 8 in Imperial County, what did you base that on? I see that the official name designation only covers San Diego County (https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/research-innovation-system-information/documents/place-names/web-2020-named-freeways-final-a11y.pdf) but was there additional signage for the name in Imperial County?
Supaplex (2019-02-07 06:15:16+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Hjart (2018-08-10 07:13:04+00:00): Converting to footway is probably smarter than adding bunches of foot=yes & bicycle=no tags
rik_ (2018-08-10 07:26:10+00:00): Hi Hjart,

path is the right way type here IMHO, see the wiki pages[1], [2].

After thinking about it, I suppose the foot=yes tag is redundant, so I'll remove it. 

There are signs attached to the gates which prohibit mountainbike riding, so the bicycle=no tag is justified here, IMHO.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
Hjart (2018-08-10 07:45:25+00:00): Where exactly does the wiki say that path would be correct here?
rik_ (2018-08-10 08:29:31+00:00): Hi Hjart,

a footway is a way primarily and exclusively used by pedestrians (sidewalks, footpaths designated with a traffic sign).[1]

A path on the other side is less specific in it's definition and covers a lot more usages, including hiking trails[2].

There are several pages in the Wiki which cover the footway vs. path discussion. The hiking trails page[3] and the "Path Examples" page[4] have some examples including photos of tagging footway vs. path. After reading these pages I think it's obvious that highway=path is the right choice here.

mvh Marcus

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking
[4] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Path_examples
Hjart (2018-08-10 11:23:19+00:00): These paths are exclusively used by pedestrians, right? Hiking trails are exlusively for pedestrians, right? Apart from that, please note that the wiki was created by ordinary mappers like you and me, who didn't always agree on how to things and that parts of it, including sections relating to highway=path, as a result is pretty fucked up.
rik_ (2018-08-10 14:00:30+00:00): Hi Hjart,

I agree, this is a never-ending discussion which is going on for years already. I think we can agree that the goal should be to provide as much consistency in tagging schemes as possible.

With this in mind, I think your change from path to footway made the tagging more confusing in this case.

Most hiking trails in the area are tagged consistently as "path", except the handful of ways you just changed.

If you take a look at other areas in the world you would notice that the differentiation between path and footway is more and more implemented as described in the Wiki. While written by the community and people like you and me, the Wiki still provides a quite consistent guideline for tagging in the most cases these days.

Some similar ways were even changed by you in the direct opposite direction from footway to path some time ago[1] … ;-)

mvh Marcus

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39000538
Hjart (2018-08-10 14:11:17+00:00): Yes, I used to change footway->path, but with increasing experience I have changed my mind about it...
Leo Slager (2018-08-11 22:12:45+00:00): Goede aanvulling op de kaart.
user_5359 (2018-08-11 12:21:09+00:00): Hello! Short question to your two bridges: What ist the meaning of the tags
elevation=2
elevation_1=1
in connection with a bridge?
Ionut Paduretu (2018-08-27 06:31:17+00:00): Is the high of the bridge, the distance in levels between the water and the bridge
user_5359 (2018-08-27 15:04:17+00:00): Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele : this key defines the elevation (height above sea level) of a point, in metres.
I'm assuming you mean the headroom of the bridge: Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxheight.
HLOSM (2018-08-13 17:32:44+00:00): Hi Warin61,

I saw that you added a segment here with two route relations (Auckland Hauraki Tour Aotearoa and Te Araroa North Island). Here is the lat and lon for the specific segment,
-37.00144885,174.80207825000002

Is it possible for you to add these two relations into the adjacent segment with the same name (Puhinui Road) that was last edited by an user called Dave Leaver?
Warin61 (2018-08-13 23:40:31+00:00): Possible? Oh .. that is from  a roundabout ..
there are 2 duplicated segments that I did not pick up on. 

Way: Puhinui Road (615737626) is preferred as that includes the roundabout in the routing. 
Way: Puhinui Road (24709480) is not preferred as it goes directly from Tom Pearce Drive - not through the roundabout. A router would not pick up on the roundabout and miss instructions for the roundabout. 

So .. I have deleted way  24709480 and move the route membership on it over  to way 615737626 
Done. That is the reverse of what you wanted, but it is what is there on the ground - a roundabout that needs to be navigated through. 

There are problems with Onehunga to Manukau via Airport bus route .. missing bits .. missing stops .. lots to do there. 
I was concerned with the Te Araroa route as that was very mixed up - not a sequenced set of ways. That is important as it is used to generate gpx files and elevation profiles by https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=5!-41.1291!183.7799 

Hope that works for you .
HLOSM (2018-08-14 18:20:56+00:00): Thank you for changing it and moving the two relations over to the way 615737626.
dval (2019-01-22 11:52:37+00:00): Здравствуйте! Вы рисовали в Лесном landuse=residential. При этом многие дома пересекаются с этими областями. Валидатор редактора JOSM делает разумное замечание по этому поводу. Прошу Вас вернуться к правкам и устранить замечания.
dval (2019-01-22 12:05:56+00:00): Также есть много случаев, когда дома на одной улице имеют одинаковые номера, напр., Гоголя, 9 - 4 шт.
Damnit (2018-08-18 14:10:32+00:00): по поводу отношений Комсомольский и Полубратово. Комсомольский - бывший совхоз, объединявший несколько деревень; от него осталась только точка на карте. А вся деревня - Полубратово, Вы напрасно её разделили)
Alexander-II (2018-08-30 19:29:49+00:00): Deleted name:uk and name:ru
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61524778
François2 (2018-08-10 09:27:18+00:00): Bonjour, Le magasin go sport ne se trouve pas ou vous l'avez déplacé, mais il est bel et bien dans le centre commercial.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2018-08-10 09:36:42+00:00): Bonjour,

Désolé, cela est du à un bug . Cordialement,
François2 (2018-08-10 09:38:14+00:00): Ok. Merci pour la correction rapide !
literan (2018-08-10 10:55:06+00:00): зачем вы удаляете зоны landuse=residential? в этой части правка будет откачена
Александр1978 (2018-08-10 14:28:44+00:00): Потому как отрисовка от фонаря. Все это будет переделываться. Кто то зачем-то каждый дом обрисовывает этим полигоном - если так нравится то можно целым куском забить резинтиал. Может я не понимаю конечно но смысла обрисовывать каждый дом частной территорией без name, не имеет.
literan (2018-08-10 15:54:04+00:00): вот где здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206132341#map=17/55.93505/38.02723 обрисован "каждый дом"? и потом, даже если так, сначала надо переделать, а потом уже удалять. Леса у нас в Сибири или на севере грубо обрисованы - что, тоже все скопом удалить? Ваш подход противоречит базовым принципам проекта
Александр1978 (2018-08-10 16:00:10+00:00): К пром. зоне вопросов нет.  Ну ок, если так напрягает удаление именно этих полигонов то более не стану этого делать.
literan (2018-08-10 16:37:12+00:00): landuse=residential это не промзона, это жилая зона. А удаление (без обоснования и желательно обсуждения с сообществом) напрягает абсолютно любое. Приходите на форум, в телеграм-чат (если что, могу сбросить координаты), советуйтесь, прежде чем что-то подобное делать.
Александр1978 (2018-08-10 16:51:20+00:00): А давайте скиньте, интересно почитать.
literan (2018-08-11 08:47:18+00:00): форум https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21 и канал в telegram https://t.me/ruosm
laurent-38 (2018-08-10 09:04:37+00:00): Bonjour,
Le nouvel emplacement du magasin est erroné (au milieu du parking !).
Merci de le rétablir à l’emplacement d’origine.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2018-08-10 09:29:37+00:00): Bonjour,

point déplacé
laurent-38 (2018-08-10 09:11:54+00:00): Bonjour,
votre modification a supprimé un certain nombre d’attributs qui semblaient pertinents :
brand="Go Sport", brand:wikidata=Q3117422, brand:wikipedia="fr:Groupe Go Sport", wheelchair=yes.

Pourquoi les avoir supprimés ?

Cordialement
~~
laurent-38
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2018-08-10 09:40:51+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est rectifié.Cordialement,
literan (2018-08-10 10:57:46+00:00): здесь вы снова массово удаляете труд других мапперов - полигоны landuse=residential. Откатываю, при продолжении будет обращение в DWG и блокировка.
laurent-38 (2018-08-10 09:29:25+00:00): Bonjour,
ce magasin est un doublon de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5336519599, placé sur la carte il y a 7 mois, par un contributeur qui l’a vu lui-même.

Je suggère du fusionner ces 2 nœuds, en respectant l’emplacement de #533651959 

Cordialement
~~
laurent
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2018-08-10 09:50:15+00:00): Bonjour, 

C'est corrigé.Cordialement,
Jordi MF (2018-08-15 08:36:11+00:00): Hola Noark,

Gracias por tus contribuciones en OpenStreetMap. He visto que has utilizado ciertas etiquetas a la vez de manera incorrecta. En concreto, no se pueden usar leisure=*, place=* o highway=* a la vez. Por ejemplo, ésto sucede en Plaça de l'Ermira de Sant Roc. Por favor, corrígelo cuando puedas. Nornalmente, la plazas suelen etiquetarse con highway=pedestrian + area=yes (también es posible usar place=square). En plazas, asegúrate que haya vías que conecten, mediante un nodo, con dicha plaza o zona peatonal (por cuestiones de enrutamiento). Un saludo!
TihomirDugi (2018-12-17 21:35:30+00:00): This is not BIKČEVIĆEVA STAZA, the original path is going right of path No.19 and I will correct it again. 

http://www.medvednica.info/2010/10/planinarska-staza-18.html
Archiver (2018-08-10 08:46:16+00:00): Warum wurde der Weiler "Aichelbach" (geändert in suburb) in der Karte angezeigt und "Zell" nicht ?
laurent-38 (2018-08-10 09:31:46+00:00): Bonjour,

ce nœud est un doublon de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5109474433. Je suggère de les fusionner.

Cordialement
~~
laurent
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2018-08-10 09:53:07+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est corrigé. Cordialement,
frosm (2020-03-31 18:41:59+00:00): Bonjour,
que voulez-vous dire avec  source=surveillance  ?
hitohinata (2018-08-10 09:18:33+00:00): #r646
mueschel (2018-08-10 19:10:56+00:00): Hallo,
OSM ist kein Platz für Werbung. Solche Aussagen wie "Unsere Barkeeper freuen sich jeden Abend." gehören hier nicht hin. Die restlichen Angaben scheinen aber alle in Ordnung zu sein.
Nur die Telefonnummer sollte im internationalen Format mit "+49..." angegeben werden.
Gruß, Jan
grueneberg (2018-08-13 12:50:51+00:00): Dies war mein erster EIntrag danke für die Hilfe und Informationen LG Peter
abakus_uploader (2018-08-10 22:30:43+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Reza_koulivand (2018-08-23 05:37:46+00:00): سلام، خسته نباشی، آقای قبادی در مورد نام نویسی معابر نام فارسی رو فقط تو قسمت نام (name) بنویسید چون ویرایش شما در منطقه ایران هست بصورت پیشفرض زبان فارسی انتخاب میشه، و اگر قسمت نام فارسی (name:fa) رو انتخاب کنید ربات بعد مدتی حذف میکنه میتونید بجاش (name:en)  رو انتخاب کنید نام لاتین رو بنویسید. بنظر من چون این نقشه جهانی هستش بهتر که نام لاتین هم وارد بشه،چون که توریستا ازین نقشه استفاده میکنند
Chris Fleming (2018-08-10 13:41:38+00:00): Hi, thanks for making the edit, I see that you requested a review and overall the change looks great. Their are a few things that aren't necessarily obvious that will improve things.

The first is very simple, it's nice to square off the building, this is simply a case of selecting the building in ID and using S to square it off.

The second, is that rather than associate the 20A-20E with the whole building is to add entrance nodes(points) where each entrance is.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris
R0bst3r (2018-08-16 12:31:32+00:00): Hallo gabs90,
laut Kommentar wurde eine Wittwer Filliale entfernt. Tatsächlich aber ein Spielplatz gelöscht.
Ist hier etwas schief gelaufen?
Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61528179
gabs90 (2018-08-16 12:34:43+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,

das Entfernen des Spielplatzes war Absicht, der Kommentar würde aber von der vorherigen Änderung übernommen.
Gruß
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-28 04:48:41+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3283340 ?
Jakka (2018-08-10 14:08:36+00:00): Misschien een betere tag dan retail voor de patisserie...zie: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dpastry
Drukkerij daar is niet veel van te vinden zie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=printing
Omegatherion (2018-08-12 09:36:51+00:00): Hi Kaffeeringe,
was willst du mit den historic:building ausdrücken?
kaffeeringe (2018-08-12 10:49:50+00:00): Hej, Danke, dass Du Dich drum kümmerst.

Die Gebäude stehen unter Denkmalschutz. Ich hatte das Wiki so verstanden, dass die als building:historic markiert werden. Nur mit dem Wert war ich mir unsicher.
Jordi MF (2018-09-02 21:25:31+00:00): Hola Antonio,

He corregit la plaça que havies afegit. En les places cal que hi haja vies que la "toquen". Aquestes vies no només han de travessar la plaça, sinó que cal crear nodes en aquells punts on la via (el carrer) toca el perímetre de la plaça. Això permet que els enrutadors (les aplicacions que calculen rutes) sàpiguen com arribar a la plaça. Cordialment,
Jordi
antoniopolonio (2018-09-03 08:45:23+00:00): Gràcies, Jordi. Ho tindré en compte.
Jordi MF (2018-09-02 20:25:05+00:00): Hola Antonio,
Gràcies per millorar el mapa d'OSM.
He vist en aquest changeset que vas modificar el Carrer del Comte de Sicart de Vila-seca. Vas canviar el tipus de via de "highway=living_street" a "highway=pedestrian". Açò no seria correcte ja que els carrers del centre de Vila-seca tenen un senyal de trànsit característic que es correspon en el mateix que s'utilitza per a l'hora de mapejar "living_street". Ací tens la wiki per a consultar-ho: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
Deixo que ho corregeixis tu (si no estàs d'acord, comenta-ho). Mentrestant, canviaré el sentit d'aquest carrer (ja que es circula direcció nord-est).
Salutacions,
Jordi