piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
boda boda (2020-10-24 14:32:56+00:00): Hi Mashin,

please conflate house numbers like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8042257126 before upload.

Kind regards,
Boda
Mashin (2020-10-24 20:43:23+00:00): Hi Boda,
for this import we decided to keep the addresses as separate nodes.
osmviborg (2020-10-24 16:11:12+00:00): Please don't move address tags to polygons, don't touch the address nodes. Thank you.
Leo Slager (2020-10-27 11:06:25+00:00): reverted with my changeset 93115850
Due to severe damage to the map.
olo81 (2020-10-28 02:45:40+00:00): Zamieniłeś platformę przystankową na chodnik? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/204550836/history
olo81 (2020-10-29 20:47:34+00:00): i dlaczego usuwasz nazwy platform ?
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:33:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92990070
Ale_Zena_IT (2021-04-11 20:41:13+00:00): Hello. Your comment sound a bit sarcastic.
I suggest to use the changeset's comment (the features I'm using now, after logged in, click on the blue button to insert your comment) to inform some "manager" or the local "community".

Cheers
  Alessandro
Gerd Waldmann (2021-04-14 07:55:20+00:00): Hello Alessandro, the people that I've meant, do know what I want to say with this. It seems to me some "contributors" want to keep the map unchanged, even if there are issues like those I've edited. In my opinion a map is only good if it is always up to date. That means issues should be removed and changes should be done. How ever this is, my comment is long time ago. Since that time I kept my fingers away from that region, to avoid to make one or other nervous. Have a good day. Gerd Waldmann
Ale_Zena_IT (2021-04-15 08:34:19+00:00): Hello Gerd,
this sound more clear.
Please, remember these comments are public; don't be afraid to speak clearly, so anyone can get the point.
Cheers
  Alessandro
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:33:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92990141
karson_ (2020-10-24 16:59:49+00:00): It looks like user, radissonhotelsspark, is the person going around adding the address information and changing the name tag for this hotel brand. Based on their username, it seems they are editing for Radisson. Per the Wikipedia page, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radisson_Hotel_Group, "Country Inn & Suites" rebranded to become "Country Inn & Suites by Radisson" in January 2018.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92990621
iandees (2020-10-24 17:48:12+00:00): Yep, understood. At least around me, all the Country Inn & Suites don't have the "by Radisson" on the sign, so this felt like a better name. At the very least the location/city should not be included.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92990621
tastrax (2020-10-28 11:16:01+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
sp!rt (2020-11-04 17:43:16+00:00): А что это за точка attraction "Дубовая аллея"? Это официальный топоним?
atimokhin (2020-11-04 17:54:05+00:00): да, насколько мне известно. это часть территории разрушенной усадьбы Оленино.
Nakaner (2020-10-26 08:50:47+00:00): Hi,

this changeset seems to be a mechanical edit. Could you please answer the following questions?

1. Who is the person responsible for the Maproulette task? Did he/she follow the Organised Editing Guideline?

2. Where can I find the documentation and discussion of this mechanical edit as required by the Automated Edits Code of Conduct (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct)?

I would like to ask you to pause this retagging activity until the questions above are answered and the requirements of the guidelines fulfilled.

Best regards

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92991133
DiGro (2020-10-26 10:09:47+00:00): ad 1 : thetornado76's Project.
          Don't know if he/she followed Guidelines. I just came across the task and participated.
ad 2 : I have no idea

I wil pause the task and wait the outcome
DiGro (2020-10-26 12:14:40+00:00): BTW: no mechanical edit used. I did it all manually.
Maybe I messed up the workflow which caused this ?
Greetings
DiGro
Amegaz (2020-12-29 16:54:41+00:00): Hi GPSfriend,
Bist Du sicher, dass der Weg 512673484 als Fußweg ausgeschildert ist? Wenn nicht, dann ist Highway=path richtig.
Kannst Du das bitte prüfen.
Viele Grüße 
Amegaz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92991498
iWowik (2020-10-25 17:46:24+00:00): День добрый!
Смотрю, что у вас что-то пошло не так с old_name 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/270066935/history
DP24PH (2020-10-29 04:06:51+00:00): Unfortunately, this changeset have encroached certain regions (NCR, Central Luzon) wherein it shouldn't happen for the specific comment. Kindly reduce the changeset area into one area (unless editing certain bus routes) to avoid confusion.
gscholz (2020-12-12 08:21:51+00:00): Hi Diego,
your recent acivities have created a big amount of errors in the osm database regarding not connected ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-63.47331&lat=-28.54440&zoom=8&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As you know, unconnected ways can not be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
Farras (2020-10-25 23:35:01+00:00): Hi, castillo89. You just put the entire Sumatra island underwater. Please be careful next time. This changeset has now been reverted.
Kampar (2020-11-18 12:28:28+00:00): hihihihi ... padahal dia cuma nambahin 

natural water saja ...
PT-53 (2020-10-25 07:05:39+00:00): Hallo  Joerg-CH,
Du hast an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27206861/history
das Merkmal
bicycle=no
ergänzt.
Ist der Weg zwischenzeitlich für Fahrräder gesperrt worden? 
Welches Verkehrszeichen steht dann jetzt dort?
Als ich vor 2 1/2 Jahren dort - mit dem Rad - entlang gefahren bin, durfte man dort noch durchfahren.

Fragende Grüße
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:09:10+00:00): Your mappings are rather accurate and squared.
Thanks and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92992827
ma-rt-in (2020-10-26 17:02:46+00:00): Hallo,
bitte nicht nur die Hausnummern ergänzen, sondern unbedingt die zugehörige Straße, da man sonst nix mit den Adressen anfangen kann.
vg
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:07:23+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92993004
mariotomo (2021-05-04 14:53:29+00:00): hola. I see you rewound some roads marked as "residential" back in time to "construction". that is not something I would do as a remote editor. myself, I'm not able to confirm either interpretation: I don't know how old the Maxar pictures, and I would more rely on local people for such contributions.
Trevor_1 (2021-05-05 15:54:58+00:00): Oh ok. I won't do that anymore.
mariotomo (2021-05-05 16:07:06+00:00): please check with oamn90 (he joined the Telegram group), he lives in the area, but is very much a beginner.  he has first hand information and could use some help learning how to use tags.

on the other hand, you did enjoy mapping natural features?  like waterways?  do you think you want to have a look at the area around Volcán?  there's several streams with very ample riverbeds, which I'm not so sure how to map.  be welcome to bring the discussion in the group, or on the forum, and please write in English including an automated translation to Spanish.
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:31:45+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92993162
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:32:47+00:00): The quality standards of HOTOSM are rather high. This means that a mapping must be an accurate representation of a building.

Your mappings do not comply with that criteria.

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve them

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92993162
ToniE (2020-10-25 11:13:36+00:00): Hi mctheduck,

es scheint, als ob die Buswendemöglichkeit der Baustelle zum Opfer gefallen ist.
Wie ist den jetzt die Möglichkeit für die Busse zum Wenden? Oder gibt es gar neue Busrouten?

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-MVV-Analysis.html#bus_463

VG
Toni
mctheduck (2020-10-29 23:20:25+00:00): Hi Toni,
viel Platz zum wenden ist in der Tat nicht aber laut MVG-Plan fährt der Bus die Strecke noch wie gehabt. Ich habe leider live noch keinen Bus dort beobachtet. Ich hoffe das klärt sich bald.
Grüß,
Dirk
Reeniz (2020-10-25 00:05:04+00:00): Por favor disminuye el tamaño de tus changeset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92993731
stevea (2020-10-25 02:33:18+00:00): Mis disculpas, el número de elementos cambiados se mantuvo deliberadamente bajo mientras lo hice (solo 14 formas y 1 relación en este conjunto de cambios).

Por ejemplo, trabajé para mantenerlos en países individuales de América Central y del Sur, uno o dos a cada changeset.

El área puede ser grande, pero como la densidad es baja, lo que cambió en cada changeset (¿conjunto?) de cambios no es demasiado, espero.
stlmapper74 (2020-10-24 16:56:01+00:00): http://routenstudy.com/site/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/2020.01.31_Route_N_Tentative_Preferred_Alternative_Revised_FootprintandCL-2-3-2020.jpg
Anisa IRM-ED (2021-06-24 04:00:00+00:00): Olá, @tarta
Espero que você esteja bem.
Encontrei uma rodovia cruzada com este reservatório (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/409625030), https://maproulette.org/challenge/17412/task/97100852
Eu quero resolver a intersecção, mas limitada com o conhecimento local sobre as características da área.

você se importaria de corrigir esse problema? ou me avise se houver alguma atualização nesta área. Obrigado, feliz mapeamento

traduzido pelo Google
tarta (2021-06-24 14:46:23+00:00): Done.
Anisa IRM-ED (2021-06-25 03:21:23+00:00): thank you for your contribution and fixed the issue :)
rgbimport (2022-06-06 22:31:00+00:00): Revisa la señalización de velocidad máxima ya que no coincide con la de la vía ni con la imagen de PNOA en la que la velocidad máxima cambia por carril.
Seraq (2022-06-07 05:22:24+00:00): Hola rgbimport en la Calle del Cementerio la velocidad máxima es de 20 km/h, no sé si te refieres a esta calle...
trial (2021-06-09 20:55:29+00:00): Bonjour, au niveau de https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863347995#map=20/48.24991/-4.47344&layers=Y, pourquoi avoir décrit ça comme une piste cyclable alors que c'est un trottoir, avdec usage mixte piétons/vélos ?
NicolasDumoulin (2021-06-10 10:24:21+00:00): Bonjour. En effet, en revoyant les photos, c'est bien un usage mixte. Erreur donc de ma part.
Je vous laisse corriger ou vous préferrez que je le fasse ?
En tout cas, bien vu !
Merci
Nicolas
trial (2021-06-10 18:43:21+00:00): Comme je n'ai pas de photos récentes plus à l'est et que Mapillary n'est pas à jour je préfère vous laisser la main. Sur Maxar, je vois le trottoir quasiment jusqu'au giratoire mais au delà je ne sais trop s'ils traversent à nouveau au niveau de Sport et Nature ou pas. Quant au C30 juste après ce n'est sûrement pas un path. Sans doute de la voie d'accès d'un petit parking (correspondant à la parcelle 14).
NicolasDumoulin (2021-06-10 20:39:56+00:00): Corrigé ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106177213#map=16/48.2497/-4.4811&layers=Y
Pour le rond-point de sport-nature, le tracé est correct. J'ai encore un bon souvenir de ce passage bien aménagé et des photos.
Pour le C30 qui est en path, oui, c'est plutôt une voie de service ou quelquechose du genre jusque la barrière.
Frans S (2020-10-26 13:25:40+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
I noticed that you map from the Bing Imagery
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from.
That is the most recent imagery . See the instructions which says to use the Maxar Premium Imagery.
(Bing is too old  2009 - 2014)
(Often iDeditor select standard the Bing Imagery)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92994566
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:07:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92994750
kuhni74 (2023-07-07 08:49:23+00:00): Wo kommt die Bezeichnung "Altes Schloss Mauer" her? In allen mir bekannten Quellen steht "Maurerlahn-Schlössl", insbesondere Denkmalamt.
kuhni74 (2023-07-07 08:50:22+00:00): das "Maurer Schloss" war hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8746376787
kuhni74 (2023-12-28 23:39:37+00:00): darf ich nochmal ganz artig nachfragen?
kuhni74 (2025-02-03 13:12:36+00:00): darf ich nochmal lästig sein?
Girolamo (2025-02-03 16:10:47+00:00): Kann in der Sache leider nicht behilflich sein. Ich habe das nicht ergänzt. Historiker unter uns?
kuhni74 (2025-02-03 16:25:20+00:00): Ähm, den Namen "Altes Maurer Schloss" hast durchaus Du ergänzt vor 4 Jahren, mit genau diesem CS 92994893. Vorher stand da Mauerlahn-Schlössel, und auch später dann auch wieder. Wenn Du nicht weißt, wo es herkam, kann es aus dzt. alt_name weg, oder?
kartonage (2020-10-25 20:19:03+00:00): Hallo,

kannst du bitte entsprechende Quellen angeben?
Und warum wurde das Tag vom Regierungsflughafen entfernt?

Cheers
4b696d (2020-10-26 08:49:37+00:00): Moin,
Quelle war das Luftbild von Brandenburg, hab ich leider vergessen anzugeben. 
Zum Regierungsflughafen. Das ist ein Terminal mit dem Namen Regierungsflughafen und das hat auch ne eigene Rampe, aber das ist doch kein eigenständiger Flughafen, der Flughafen ist immer noch BER. Finde ich auch bei Tegel fragwürdig.
Irgendwer hat auch das Terminal 5 zum eigenständigen Flughafen ernannt, das halte ich für ähnlich fragwürdig, zumal das so weit ich weiß noch den alten Namen trägt.
aklopau_kontur (2021-12-23 17:44:28+00:00): Hi iriman.
Thank you for your contributing in OSM.
I can't open source that you mention: http://ayan.arak.ir/pdf/mahale.pdf
Can you check this site and clarify the link?
Thanks.
iriman (2021-12-23 20:07:45+00:00): Hi Andrei. It seems website is down. You can download its archived version at archive.org.
Thanks
zuicz (2020-10-25 15:52:02+00:00): Popsułeś tory trochę przy stacji Gniezno ;)
naveenpf (2020-10-27 06:45:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92995286
ToniE (2020-10-24 17:38:12+00:00): Haus 27
Rainero (2020-10-24 23:20:22+00:00): Alle stürzen sich auf die neuen Luftbilder ;)
mariotomo (2020-10-25 15:02:52+00:00): hola. bienvenido a OSM!  es muy importante tener personas del lugar que puedan contribuir información que no se aprecia de las fotos aéreas!  cuidado con la información **personal** como esta de la **residencia**.  si se trata de residencia-taller-tienda, debes marcarla como taller-tienda, no como residencia.  tenemos varios canales de charla, lo más utilizado es un grupo Telegram, para apoyarse entre principiantes.
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:06:53+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92996021
Frans S (2020-10-27 16:06:29+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here

Validators review mappings of (new) mappers. 
This is a check on the Imagery which has been used.
According to the records you mapped from the Bing Imagery.
The Bing imagery is often loaded as standard Imagery in iDeditor.
Please change to the Maxar Premium Imagery to map from the Imagery which is prescribed.
That is the most recent imagery.
(Bing is outdated and dates from  2009 - 2014)

See this document how to change the imagery
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#configuring-the-background-layer
(Often Bing select standard the Bing Imagery)

Best regards and keep mapping.

ps: It is possible that you received this message on another changeset as well. 
Sorry for that. There is no way to avoid duplicate messages.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92996061
DressyPear4 (2020-10-24 19:00:51+00:00): Isso realmente existe ou você está inventando essas modificações?
Pelas imagens de satélite não dá para ver nada em construção ai, e a geografia do local não aparenta comportar um aeroporto internacional.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92996533
mikkolukas (2020-10-24 21:10:01+00:00): I see no controversy in removing names from driveways; I do it myself - for the same reason.

Changeset looks fine to me :)
Jolesh (2020-10-24 22:04:05+00:00): Okay, great :)
The telegram group told me, deleting/changing wrong data but keeping data which you don't understand or find unnecessary. I think that's a good principle, I also want my error/outdated edits corrected but not tags deleted just because not everybody finds them important.
mikkolukas (2020-10-25 01:24:58+00:00): Agree, but it could be a topic pf discussion for some: "Does driveways have street names even if none is present 'on the ground'?"

My argument is they don't. They don't have their own streetname sign and they don't represent the actual road, leading from point A to point B.

They are connections. From that said road to an endpoint.
Hjart (2020-10-25 07:31:27+00:00): Please note that names can be important for navigation though. I have often named footways near buildings, with unassociated roads just behind them, in urban settings just to enable correct navigation. In similar cases naming driveways can be important too.
Hjart (2020-10-25 07:43:42+00:00): Consider i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=55.3349%2C8.7677%3B55.3443%2C8.7770 . The building is inaccessible from Trojelsvej, but the routing engine has no way to know that. As soon as you name the accessroad "Fasanvej", Fasanvej will be closer to the house address than Trojelsvej and the routing will be correct.
Jolesh (2020-10-25 08:21:28+00:00): Okay good point there. But I think that is a problem of the router because I want my router to direct me to the address and not to the nearest point of a street with the same name. Maybe this is configurable and if not I think it should be reported.
Hjart (2020-10-25 08:27:11+00:00): Personally I think the router designers already thought about situations like this and found that this was the only sensible way it could work.
Hjart (2020-10-25 08:30:23+00:00): You are of course welcome to experiment to your hearts desire yourself, but good luck...
Jolesh (2020-10-25 08:33:50+00:00): Yeah I would definitely not delete the name in that situation, now that I know how important it can be.
Hjart (2020-10-25 10:52:15+00:00): Looks like if you can inch a driveway a little bit closer to an adress node than the nearest major road, routing actually will work correctly, even if the driveway is unnamed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=55.1534%2C8.7829%3B55.1489%2C8.7811
Note though that there are differences between the many OSM based router implementations out there
osmviborg (2020-10-25 12:22:43+00:00): Ladegårdvej: 
https://vis.aws.dk/navngivneveje/ca850cb2-53c7-4a00-a1e3-7c79bd4966c8