piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2016-06-18 22:08:31+00:00): No, I live a bit to the east... 7500km to the east to be precise. If you have further questions, feel free to send me a message.
Jan
Your Village Maps (2016-06-19 23:23:18+00:00): One thing I'm still not quite clear on:  take a typical 3-lane 2-way street like we've been discussing, tag it like you said....but in the areas where it crosses another street (usually tertiary or higher and usually with traffic signals), that center lane becomes a left-turn lane in the direction approaching the intersection (not open to traffic going away from intersection). So how do you change the tagging for those short segments, assuming there's no median so it's still a 2-way street?
mueschel (2016-06-20 20:35:51+00:00): You got a private message - I think that is too much to discuss in changeset comments.
Supaplex (2016-08-08 17:30:11+00:00): 這邊有畫重覆的狀況，記得OpenStreetMap是協同合作的共編地圖計畫，從原先畫的不足的地方補足，不必再依完整軌跡重繪一次
luschi (2016-12-10 15:51:38+00:00): Hi fayor,
why have you changed the "ref=A CT-SR" from Autostrada Catania-Siracusa to "ref=A01"?
There is no "A01" in Italy.
what are you using at source for this change?
Correct ref described in Wikipedia should be "ref=aut.CT-SR", and Mapillary image show also "ref=aut.CT-SR":
https://d1cuyjsrcm0gby.cloudfront.net/Ztqwst1l1NEgoPdq43v5_A/thumb-2048.jpg
fayor (2016-12-10 16:24:46+00:00): http://www.google.it/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjktNTFhOrQAhWFSRoKHdS6BhUQFggaMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.stradeanas.it%2Fsala_stampa%2Fcomunicati_stampa%2Fscarica%2Farg%2Fcomunicati%2Fid%2F15299&usg=AFQjCNFADVZthjJY21XKAjG8kzleKz04Cg&sig2=fLqE0Nl3PL_ouRMlACI04w&bvm=bv.141320020,d.ZGg
luschi (2016-12-10 23:53:31+00:00): for me this looks like a not official number from ANAS. 
The immage from mapillary is from August 2016 and the pdf from your link is from 2015(only this pdf use A01 for this motorway).
Also is to check, if you have the license to import data from ANAS website to OSM!
fayor (2016-12-11 14:32:17+00:00): Basta una semplice ricerca per verificare che il ref "A01", anche se non riportato nei cartelli, identifica questo tratto autostradale, seppure, ritengo, provvisoriamente. In precedenza il tratto era classificato come NSA339, ma anche in quel periodo il codice non era riportato nei cartelli. 
Ecco altri link che si riferiscono all'A01 anche come "ex NSA339": http://www.coisp.it/archivio-completo/finish/191-siracusa/14554-coisp-siracusa-autostrada-catania-siracusa-personale-impiegato-presso-il-distaccamento-di-lentini-problematiche-03-lug-2015
http://www.motorionline.com/traffico/strade-anas/strada/A01/?refresh_ce
http://catania.mobilita.org/2015/11/14/autostrada-catania-siracusa-lanas-comunica-limitazioni-del-traffico/
http://www.siracusatimes.it/per-lavori-anas-limitazioni-al-traffico-sulla-siracusa-catania-e-la-statale-di-augusta/
http://www.google.it/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj3iNi2rezQAhUH0xQKHewKCxAQFgggMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.comunediaugusta.it%2Favvisi-dell-urp%2Fdownload%2F1160_0abcd787f13313969d7651718f20aef2&usg=AFQjCNHMIE176ABaXRhZlpR2XfG8qVnBzw&sig2=vN45IyUXaGhNuLyCsKZORw
luschi (2016-12-11 17:21:44+00:00): All these links are from ANAS or using data from ANAS.
OSM use numbers what are on the streetsings and not the numbers what using some site they not can be used as source.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground     
corps.it link is from 2015 and use part of data from ANAS link in your first post.     
motorionline.com quote:"Fonti Dati: ANAS e altre fonti istituzionali".    
mobilita.org use data(2015) from first ANAS link you posted above.   
siracusatimes.it use the same data(2015) from ANAS.     
latest link from you is from ANAS from 2015.     
Because all you links are from ANAS and from 2015 and the image from Mapillary is from middle 2016, I changed the ref to that from Mapillary: "ref=aut.CT-SC" and "unsigned_ref=A01".
SomeoneElse (2016-12-24 17:41:24+00:00): Hi fayor,
Looking at the changes here, it looks like signage for "aut.CT-SC" definitely appears.  Do you have evidence that signage for A01 appears anywhere?  Wikipedia (though not directly usable as a source) claims it has no number: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autostrada_Catania-Siracusa .
A summary of changes so far for info:
http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=6192714
If A01 only appears in official documentation then the values as of http://osm.org/browse/changeset/44327582 would seem correct to me.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
fayor (2016-12-26 14:51:33+00:00): Il numero che identifica quest'autostrada, da indicare in "ref", inizialmente era NSA339; attualmente l'Anas, che gestisce la tratta, nei propri comunicati si riferisce alla Catania-Siracusa con il codice alfanumerico A01, simile a quello delle altre autostrade italiane. "A CT-SR", "Aut. CT-SR" e simili sono solo abbreviazioni del nome dell'autostrada, e in quanto tali non dovrebbero essere indicate nel "ref". Il fatto che sui cartelli non ci sia A01 (come non c'era nemmeno NSA339) è ininfluente, può darsi che in futuro verrà indicato oppure no: in molte strade la sigla identificativa non è nemmeno riportata nei cartelli (o ne è riportata una non aggiornata), ma non per questo è sbagliato inserirlo in mappa.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-27 10:13:23+00:00): The most-used tag for references that you can't use for navigation because they don't appear on signs is "official_ref" http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/official_ref .  There's some usage of that further north in Italy (see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kSK ).  There will always be edge cases (perhaps "everybody knows" that this is the A01) but that would have to be a decision for the Sicilian community.
luschi (2016-12-30 15:30:10+00:00): I dont think that the ref=A01 is correct, because in Italy existing a A1 and this bring a lot of conflicts. A01 and A1 sounds similar because I think not all will say "A zero uno" or "A zero one" The A1 go from Milano down to Napoli. and if there existing a other motorway with a 1, 01 or 001 this allways bring conflicts to people.
I dont know other country they have a A1, A01 or A001, etc.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-08 17:19:57+00:00): So no other evidence for "ref=A01" then?  If not, I'll change it to "official_ref" in a bit.
Best Regards,
Andy
fayor (2017-01-09 16:18:29+00:00): Le prove le ho già fornite; in aggiunta è stato pubblicato recentemente anche il grafo stradale Anas a questo indirizzo, dove sono indicati tutti i codici e i nomi delle strade Anas: http://www.sciamlab.com/opendatahub/it/dataset/as_grafo-stradale-anas

Non siamo certo noi a decidere quale codice assegnare alle strade: se l'Anas ha deciso così ci sarà un motivo (A01 è diverso da A1 anche se simile, e comunque il nome "Autostrada Catania-Siracusa" associato evita qualunque rischio di confondersi).
SomeoneElse (2017-01-10 13:50:12+00:00): @fayor I don't see any evidence of signage there :)
Also note that "Creative Commons Attribution 4.0" on its own is not compatible with OSM's ODBL licence.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-17 00:37:46+00:00): In the absence of photographic evidence for A01, or other licence-compatible evidence, I've changed it back to as it was immediately before http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44335349 .  Whether "aut.CT-SC" is really a ref at all is a different issue...
Thanks for everyone's patience,
Best Regards,
Andy
naoliv (2016-06-20 11:57:44+00:00): Paulo, o que seria esse ponto que você criou?
É uma obra de arte ou uma empresa que trabalha com isso?
mueschel (2016-07-12 20:16:22+00:00): Hi,
I found 243438 nodes created by you that have no tags and are not part of any way or relation. Can these nodes be deleted?
Jan
SomeoneElse (2016-07-12 21:54:16+00:00): @mueschel The Data Working Group's aware of this changeset and the need to remove the data that it introduced.  Unfortunately the technicalities of doing so aren't quite so straightforward (an normal API download fails) so we're investigating the options.
Best Regards
Andy (DWG)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-13 00:03:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40701240 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed WA unconnected node import
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-13 03:14:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40701250 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed WA unconnected node import
aaronsta (2016-07-13 03:58:27+00:00): Hi there, This data added by this sequence of changesets was removed in the changesets:
40292745
40293650
40293839

All nodes, ways and relations and their tags were attempted to be removed in these changesets. Unfortunatley as I am now aware some nodes failed to be deleted in full. I did experience internet connection troubles at the time of the changeset revert and had to cancel the upload of data. This may explain the resulting issue. I will investigate to resolve this.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-13 08:37:47+00:00): @aaronsta Thanks for the info.  We probably ought to try and warn people not to create changesets "so big that you can't download them afterwards" (and somewhere in the wiki we may do already, but I'm not aware of it).
Do you have a full list of what you consider "these changesets"?  I'd hate for there to be any collateral damage (it took a fair bit of work to create something that matched the changeset .osc to use the revert script with, since I couldn't actually download that directly - I needed to check that I wasn't reverting anyone else's nodes as well as yours!).
aaronsta (2016-07-14 02:56:45+00:00): Hi SomeoneElse, with regards to the edits I have done relating to this data.
All of these edits did not constitute of anything other than the data that was later removed by the three changesets I listed above.
The data was added with:
40051763
40051946
40052185
40052416
40052639
40052929
40053210
Add also by:
40064280
40064728
40065268
40065907
40066399
Other changesets involved include:
40195315
40195330
40195333
40195392
aaronsta (2016-07-14 03:03:04+00:00): Another person has been working hard to try and remove these changesets, if the most recent changeset does not match one of those three above then it may have been their changeset which created the untagged nodes. If the tags can be restored through a revert of smaller changesets then the nodes can be easily deleted. I do not advise reverting one of the three above as they are quite larger and probably overlap with work you have done.
aaronsta (2016-07-14 03:06:40+00:00): Unfortunatley I cannot work out a way to remove nodes without tags as it will also bring up ways without tags and relation nodes and ways without tags. But you seem to know what you are doing SomeoneElse, please let me know if I can help.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-14 08:30:32+00:00): Thanks aaronsta - I'll compare that list to what I previously had to make sure that I don't revert something that I shouldn't.
user_5359 (2016-06-16 18:02:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice I changed you node description (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4245470113) from highway=motorway_junction to turning_circle (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dturning_circle)
schadow1 (2016-06-17 01:14:30+00:00): Hello. We do not have an addr:municipality tag standard as of the moment. Please use addr:city for municipalities in the Philippines.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-14 02:16:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40726151 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed WA unconnected node import
mavl (2016-06-16 15:00:08+00:00): Здравствуйте. Ваши изменения видны миллионам людей. Не добавляйте, пожалуйста, в OpenStreetMap выдуманную информацию.  
Этот пакет правок отменён.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-15 01:46:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40751297 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed WA unconnected node import
ToeBee (2016-07-03 06:28:09+00:00): It seems you downgraded a lot of roads in this area to highway=track. What was your basis for making this change? I do not think it is correct.

Track is to be used for roads that are designed primarily for use by agricultural or other service equipment. Like the roads leading out into fields. County roads should probably be either unclassified or tertiary, depending on how they fit into the road network. In Riley county I used KDOT maps that indicate the functional classification of roads as a base line. Minor arterial maps to secondary and major/minor collectors are tertiary. Local roads are either unclassified or residential. Then I made some adjustments from there based on my local knowledge.
Commodoortje (2016-06-16 05:55:53+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  diverse aanpassingen/verbeteringen verricht. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
De naam Sellingen is niet de naam van de praktijk maar is de woonplaats.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-15 01:46:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40751297 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed WA unconnected node import
SomeoneElse (2016-07-15 01:53:06+00:00): Sorry about the accidental deletion - I've undeleted it.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-15 01:57:01+00:00): Sorry about the "reverted" message above - I've undeleted 3 nodes that were accidentally deleted.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-15 01:54:23+00:00): Sorry about the accidental deletion - I've undeleted it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-15 01:46:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40751297 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed WA unconnected node import
SomeoneElse (2016-07-15 01:50:46+00:00): Sorry aboyt the "reverted" message above - I don't believe that anything in here has actually been reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-15 05:04:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40752516 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed WA unconnected node import
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-15 12:48:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40756978 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed WA unconnected node import
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-15 16:43:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40760865 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed WA unconnected node import
manings (2016-06-16 06:16:46+00:00): Hi NoahRio, You are deleting several buildings here.  Can you explain the reason?
It is better to improve the shape of the existing buildings rather than deleting them.
NoahRio (2016-06-16 06:44:28+00:00): Deleted some buildings that were better mapped w/o being "squared".
These were duplexes and row houses that would be more efficiently mapped through the "Terrace" plug-in/feature.
Individually going through all the buildings I deleted and correcting them by adding nodes would have expended more time/effort/energy.

Cheers,

Rio
manings (2016-06-16 06:48:07+00:00): @NoahRio,  that is true.  But we want to maintain and appreciate the contributions of others.  There is a way to do this in JOSM by using the replace geometry tool.  Steps are as follows:

1. Use the terrace plugin to create row houses.
2. Select one of the new building and the old building, click "More Tools" > "Replace Geometry"
mueschel (2016-06-23 16:25:36+00:00): Hi,
your import of boundaries produced a lot of foreign tags that are not documented. Please consider removing them, change them to usual tagging or write documentation in the wiki.

Jan
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-07-15 18:15:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40764460 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed WA unconnected node import
MissingCSAA (2016-06-16 19:12:25+00:00): Please cite a source for naming this stretch the Great Basin Highway. Per NDOT, that name does not apply here. http://www.nevadadot.com/uploadedFiles/NDOT/Traveler_Info/Maps/Nevada%20Named%20Highways%202012.pdf
Supaplex (2016-06-18 17:36:10+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

Happy Mapping!
tom_konda (2016-07-10 13:29:55+00:00): こんにちは。
この一帯で、編集をされたようですが、
landuse=residential や landuse=retail はOSMのWiki（ http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:landuse=residential?uselang=ja ）にある通り、建物個別に使用する物ではなく土地の利用を示す物です。建物ならば、building キー（ http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:building ）の方が適切かと思います。
お手すきの際に、修正していただければ幸いです。
FTA (2016-07-09 05:35:41+00:00): Hi, can you provide some context for adding http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425270917 to the Sansha City relation as part of its administrative region? What does this claim stem from?
FreedSky (2017-09-23 16:24:39+00:00): Sorry, maybe this part should not add borders.
MissingCSAA (2016-06-16 19:11:17+00:00): Please cite a source for naming this stretch the Oran K. Gragson Freeway. Per NDOT, only portions west of I-15 are named for Gragson. http://www.nevadadot.com/uploadedFiles/NDOT/Traveler_Info/Maps/Nevada%20Named%20Highways%202012.pdf
tom_konda (2016-07-10 12:52:12+00:00): こんにちは。
この一帯で、編集をされたようですが、
landuse = industrial はOSMのWiki（http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:landuse=industrial?uselang=ja）にある通り、建物個別に使用する物ではなく土地の利用を示す物です。建物ならば、building キー（http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:building）の方が適切かと思います。
お手すきの際に、修正していただければ幸いです。
tom_konda (2016-07-10 13:47:56+00:00): こんにちは。
この一帯で、編集をされたようですが、
landuse=residential はOSMのWiki（ http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:landuse=residential?uselang=ja ）にある通り、建物個別に使用する物ではなく土地の利用を示す物です。建物ならば、building キー（ http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Key:building ）の方が適切かと思います。
お手すきの際に、修正していただければ幸いです。
mavl (2019-01-04 16:30:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:30:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:30:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-06-16 18:41:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node. Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. Please delete your test entry.
tom_konda (2016-07-10 13:03:51+00:00): こんにちは。
この一帯で、編集をされたようですが、建物に amenity=place_of_worship のタグが付いているようです。この一帯に宗教施設はないので、お手すきの際に、修正していただければ幸いです。
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2018-09-22 17:25:56+00:00): (Identischer Text inkl. Bilder(!) im Blogbeitrag "Bushaltestellen in Wien https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Robhubi/diary)
________________
Hi.
Beim Planen einer Tour mit Hilfe von Online-Router ist mir in der Gudrunstraße (Nähe Matzleinsdorfer Platz, Wien) eine zunächst unerklärliche Uregelmäßigkeit aufgefallen:
https://abload.de/img/hs_autoroutingbviag.png
 
Je nach Router wird im Bereich der Haltestelle auf die Straße ausgewichen oder ein Umweg genommen.
Im iD-Editor wird die Haltestelle so dargestellt:
https://abload.de/img/hs_osmedit12et1.png
 
Ich bin jetzt kein OSM/Routing-Experte, aber ich vermute das Problem liegt darin, dass die „Bushaltestelle (Wartebereich)“ den Gehsteig unterbricht.
Am Ort gibt es diese Unterbrechung nicht:
https://abload.de/img/hs_foto8zdnp.png
 
Die Haltestellentafel und die Bank sind zurückgerückt und der Gehsteig davor ist frei begehbar. Sollte das nicht auch so gemappt werden?
Jemand hat sich sehr viel Mühe gemacht, die Haltestellen so genau zu beschreiben. Daher möchte ich nichts ohne Zustimmung ändern.
Vielen Dank für eure Kommentare!
Wanderwütiger (2018-09-22 18:38:26+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe in https://www.osm.org/changeset/62833389 den Bürgersteig ergänzt. Dadurch sollte jetzt alles korrekt funktionieren.
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2018-09-22 19:21:50+00:00): Danke für die Unterstützung, fühl mich jetzt sicherer :-)
Weltstaat (2018-09-23 09:23:37+00:00): Hi Robert,

deine Analyse stimmt. Die Wege gehören richtigerweise natürlich gemapped. Ich habe das damals nicht gemacht, da unsere Routingengine auch über Plattformen geroutet hat.

Heute mappe ich Plattformen als einfachen Way entlang der Randsteinkante und verbinde sie gegebenenfalls mit dem Footway. Hierzu gibt es aber unterschiedliche Auffassungen.

Grüße, Jonathan
mavl (2019-01-04 16:29:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:29:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:29:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:29:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Hjart (2016-06-16 10:43:01+00:00): Du er kommet til at rykke Ny Ordrup Sidealle 2 67 meter mod syd
Ewen Hill (2022-10-14 21:16:38+00:00): Hi DeVries, You added way 425284646 which had the following tags. Is it ok to remove  this?
hires = yes
hires:checkdate = 2016-06-16
hires:imagery = Bing
Ewen Hill (2022-10-14 21:17:11+00:00): This is in relation to the question asked at https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/12728
Commodoortje (2016-06-16 10:57:57+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  diverse aanpassingen/verbeteringen verricht. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.

Positie stond aan de andere zijde van het water.
Supaplex (2016-06-17 05:39:37+00:00): 「美軍領台陽明山管理局北投墓園遺址」這是警察墓園嗎？然後已經遷走的墓園要另外標示
Nakaner (2016-06-29 23:25:37+00:00): Bitte keine Leerzeichen nach dem Semikolon einfügen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4246089271
apm-wa (2016-09-10 16:36:09+00:00): Two streets here are both named Petrozawodsk on the map, but only one of them can be correct.  Which one is Petrozawodsk, and what is the name of the other street?
Ale_Zena_IT (2016-06-16 16:09:53+00:00): Ciao, C. Garrone sta per Cascina Garrone? Ho visto dalle foto aeree che c'è un edificio ma essendoci solo il tag name non sono sicuro.

Grazie
  Alessandro
ibox0 (2016-06-18 06:58:25+00:00): 
Si confermo
Cascina Garrone
ho fatto una prova di inserimento ... vorrei aggiungere anche altri toponimi della zona. l'intento è mappare i nomi di tutte le cascine e dei toponimi  della zona. esiste online un atlante delle valli stura e orba che può essere usato come di riferimento.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:29:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Kamil_Piwowarski (2016-06-17 10:21:58+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie te zmiany? 

Tam jest bieda ciąg pieszo-rowerowy.
krzysmek (2016-06-17 11:16:46+00:00): Nie rozumiem co to jest "bieda ciąg".
Kamil_Piwowarski (2016-06-17 16:30:24+00:00): Chodnik, który na siłę został oznaczony znakiem C13/16:
https://web.facebook.com/KieleckiRzecznik/photos/a.464324220295389.105940.459887317405746/713662802028195/?type=3&theater
Kamil_Piwowarski (2016-06-17 16:30:58+00:00): https://web.facebook.com/KieleckiRzecznik/photos/a.464324220295389.105940.459887317405746/714347475293061/?type=3&permPage=1
Kamil_Piwowarski (2016-07-06 07:44:25+00:00): Po raz kolejny proszę o cofnięcie zmian dla tego miejsca.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:29:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Константин Гам (2018-11-05 08:59:56+00:00): Зачем вы подвинули часть Гончарной улицы, тем самым её искривив?
zarl (2016-06-16 11:38:50+00:00): Hallo zitroneneis (ich musste mir jetzt gleich mal einen Eiskaffee machen :-) ),

Danke schon mal für die Ergänzungen, aber von Planegg nach Großhadern muss der Bus eine andere Strecke fahren: die Butenandtstrasse ist beim Hubschrauberlandeplatz eine Einbahnstrasse. Und an der Kreuzung Würmtalstrasse / Am Klopferspitz hängt auch noch ein Relationsteilstück ohne Verbindung, schau mal hier: 
http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=156182

Und das auch gleich auf der Karte abgebildet: http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=156182 

Ich hab keine Idee, wo genau der Bus entlang fährt.
zitroneneis (2016-06-18 17:11:09+00:00): Hallo zarl,
danke für die Hinweise. In  #40119995 habe ich jetzt das übrige Teilstück auch noch entfernt. Sobald ich den genauen Verlauf der Linie 266 herausfinden kann, korrigiere ich alles (wenn mir nicht jemand zuvor kommt). Der aktuell eingetragene Verlauf für Hin- und Rückfahrt stimmt mit http://efa.mvv-muenchen.de überein - auch wenn das mit der Einbahnstraße nicht ganz stimmen kann...
mavl (2019-01-04 16:29:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.