piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gsperb (2017-09-05 09:39:21+00:00): Tut mir leid wenn ich hier antworte.
Nachdem ich nicht OSM "bin", kann ich auch nichts mit irgendwem klären. Du wirst es öäffentlich klären (oder sein lassen) müssen.
Nebenbei: Der gerne anstelle des Haltestellenzeichens verwendete Eintrag "highway=platform"  ist veraltet und eine simple Haltestelle auf einem Bürgersteig ist keine "area"
ZitatANFANG
Da es massenweise Beispiele für Haltekanten gibt, welche von schienengebundenen und nicht schienengebundenen Fahrzeugen gibt wurde dieses Tag durch public_transport=platform ersetzt. 
ZitatENDE
hsimpson (2017-09-07 19:54:10+00:00): Hallo Marsuna,
ich habe mich mit dem Thema jetzt an das OSM-Forum gewandt, da ich mich persönlich mit den Datenimporten und den dazugehörigen rechtlichen Fargen nicht gut genug auskenne, um ein weiteres Vorgehen bewerten zu können.
-
Das ganze ist hier zu finden: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=662773#p662773
-
Daneben bin ich heute die betreffenden Haltestellen in Bruck abgefahren und meine Annahmen, dass keine der Haltestellen vor Ort vorhanden ist, stimmte. Daher bitte ich dich, die Haltestellen in der Zeißstraße, der Daimlerstraße und am Brucker Bahnhof wieder aus den Daten zu löschen und deine importe aus weitere Problemfälle zu überprüfen (nebenbei gibt es in der Zeißstraße mommentan umleitungsbedingt tatsächlich Busverkehr, aber dort ist trotz allem keine Haltestelle vorhanden!).
-
Viele Grüße,
hsimpson
hsimpson (2017-09-07 20:02:55+00:00): Nebenbei: Was ich am wenigsten verstehe:
Die Haltestelle Forschungszentrum auf der Günther-Scharowski-Straße ist seit etwa einem halben Jahr auf die andere Seite der Paul Gossen-Straße verlegt, da in der Günther-Scharowski-Straße derzeit Bauarbeiten durchgeführt werden. Dennoch hast du diese Haltestelle vor drei Monmaten noch am Ursprünglichen Ort bearbeitet, obwohl es hier tatsächlich noch vertetbar gewesen wäre, die Ersatzhaltestelle einzutragen (inzwischen auch nicht mehr, da die Baustelle grade abgebaut wird).
-
Irgendwo in den Daten, die du von der VAG bekommen hast, muss ordentlich der Wurm drin sein, anders kann ich mir das nicht erklären!
-
Viele Grüße,
hsimpson
MCDA (2017-06-20 12:22:53+00:00): What is this node? If it is a CCTV camera, then please tag it as such, using the following format
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance
Nakaner (2017-06-22 07:36:59+00:00): Hi Alexander-II,

this changeset is an automated edit. Have you reviewed before changing them?

The Automated Edits Code of Conduct applies to all users including you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct Please read it before uploading any further changesets with Level0.

Best regards

Michael
Alexander-II (2017-06-22 10:58:42+00:00): Hi. Yep, i've checked them very carefully. Each entry. It was first time i used level0 instead of josm, so to me there is no big difference where this edits might be made.  
Thanks for the link.  
Cheers.
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 13:41:09+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 14:13:16+00:00): Je geeft aan in je omschrijving dat de satelliet beelden niet juist aangeven. De imagery_used geef je PDOK Luchtfoto aan.
Deze satellietbeelden zijn van 2016. De satelietbeelden van 2015 geven inderdaad een ander straatbeeld. 
In OSM zullen de wegen nog verlegd moeten worden.
Is er na 2016 nog wat gewijzigd?
Mocht je hulp nodig hebben laat dit dan even weten. (wel even inloggen, dan kun je reactie geven op deze changeset)
legogo29 (2017-06-20 17:22:02+00:00): Er is hier laatst (mei 2017) wat gewijzigd, de link naar de website van de provincie geeft dit aan. Er staat echter niet wat er gewijzigd is.

Ik ben hier vandaag langs gereden en heb dit zo goed als mogelijk nagetekend zoals ik het gezien heb. Ik wil hier best nog een keer langs gaan en dan ook een GPX-track opnemen om aan te tonen dat de weg zo ligt.

Na de wijziging is de Wogmergouw (ri. Hoorn) weer twee richting geworden en is het Keern de bussluis (poller) weer in werking gezet. Dit vond ik belangrijk om op de kaart te zetten omdat verkeer nu niet meer over het Keern kan.

Ik weet niet zeker of ik de bussluis met een poller juist heb aangegeven, want het is een bussluis met een poller (ongeveer zoals op de wikipedia pagina voor bussluis staat).
aceman444 (2017-08-21 20:50:25+00:00): Dobry den,
ako ste dospeli k tomu, ze v tejto casti Bratislavy su ulice hgv=destination? Uvadzate zdroj dopravniinfo.cz, avsak tam mapa nepokryva Slovensko a podruhe aj keby ano, kde je uvedene, ze je to zdroj pouzitelny pre udaje do OSM? Dakujem
*Martin* (2017-09-08 10:15:41+00:00): Tato pani hromadne cerpa z dopravniinfo.cz a casto pokazi co je uz spravne zmapovane. Aj v Kosiciach.
TheHammer (2018-06-11 15:17:52+00:00): https://github.com/Luzifer/gpxhydrant/issues/1
Supaplex (2017-07-09 17:59:01+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Unhallowed (2017-06-20 20:12:26+00:00): Why does your town of residence span across nine states?
Medigo (2017-06-22 12:04:24+00:00): I clicked a known huge company in California to see how others had listed business addresses as I was having issues searching ours on a map that claims to use OpenStreetMap for its data.  It counted it as an "edit" though I changed nothing and I couldn't remove it from the log.
wille (2017-06-21 19:16:28+00:00): Oi, Priscila

Tudo bem? Revisei duas de suas edições em Florestal e foram muito boas! Praticamente nenhum erro! Muito obrigado pelas suas contribuições ao OSM! Se precisar de ajuda, pode me contactar!

wille
PriscilaLSilva (2017-06-22 19:30:55+00:00): Obrigada Wille,
Caso eu precise de algo entro em contato. Estou a disposição também!
user_3216889 (2017-06-20 14:09:22+00:00): Als de straat al klaar is, is het zo prima.
Anders aangeven met highway=construction en construction=living_street.
Als er daar al grondwerk plaatsvindt voor nieuwbouw, kan huidige gras verwijderd worden en omtrek van de nieuwbouw ruw worden omkaderd met een landuse=construction.
neuhausr (2017-06-20 15:09:35+00:00): Hi, can you give more explanation about what these memorials are? I don't see them on any imagery and don't find them mentioned anywhere online. Is there some documentation or explanation that you can point to? OSM best practices include "map what's on the ground" and "verifiability" http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice  I made a similar comment on another changeset under username Libby012 but received no reply. Without more information, this starts to look like vandalism. Thanks in advance for your help in clarifying.
Nakaner-repair (2017-09-15 22:55:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52083483 where the changeset comment is: Second attempt to revert undiscussed bus stop and IOFPT imports by Marsuna and mappedit (first attempt in CS 52080791 failed). See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59654 for further information.
rmikke (2017-07-14 13:15:46+00:00): Jezioro Uplik to tylko ten kawałek na południe od przesmyku pod drogą 58 między Zgonem, a Starymi Kiełbonkami. Duży akwen na północ to Jezioro Mokre.

Po pierwsze, Wikipedia tak twierdzi Wikipedia. po drugie spędziłem tam jedne z fajniejszych wakacji.
ZeroJeden (2017-07-14 13:53:32+00:00): Tak, oczywiście, właśnie moja korekta miała na celu wydzielenie jeziora Uplik z Mokrego, bo wcześniej to był zdefiniowany jeden akwen. Widocznie coś poszło nie tak przy mojej edycji. Już poprawione.
rmikke (2017-07-14 14:19:51+00:00): &#128077;
rmikke (2017-07-14 14:20:39+00:00): Yyy, chciałem napisac, że o właśnie tak, dzięki :D
zstadler (2017-07-21 08:36:28+00:00): Hi,
.
Please try to set the role of every member in a multipolygon. Leaving an empty role is deprecated, and an "outer" role is expected instead.
.
I've set the role of all members of http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7266553 to "outer".
.
Thanks!
zstadler (2021-07-11 17:23:54+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50451915
literan (2017-06-21 12:45:24+00:00): может, все же это санаторий? теги вы поставили наполовину санаторные, да и сайт... http://www.sanistra.ru/shema_proezda/
bridgeconst (2017-06-21 13:11:47+00:00): Там реорганизация идёт - непонятно, санаторий ли это будет или все же дом отдыха. На указателе съезда с дороги 46Н-02873 написано "Д.О. Истра". Склоняюсь больше к санаторию..
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 16:35:47+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 16:37:54+00:00): Goed van je dat je deze weg hebt ingebracht. Inmiddels heb ik de nieuwbouw huizen geplaatst.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49698515
(Shift+F5 in je browser versneld het renderproces)
Alecs01 (2017-06-28 20:17:49+00:00): In questi changeset sono sparite ben sette stazioni dalla relazione della ferrovia per Baiano: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2168284 tutti ricreate ex novo senza tag wikidata e wikipedia, come questo: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/282072122/history e http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4917826145/history. Di nuovo, fai attenzione per favore.
|||Breeze||| (2017-06-20 15:32:28+00:00): Apologies for the comments above (first day editor). The changes included here are simply to clarify open access versus restricted access.
|||Breeze||| (2017-06-20 15:34:05+00:00): First day editor: did not realize the comments do not update. I will be more careful in the future. The edit here is to name the park in question. It was previously unnamed.
|||Breeze||| (2017-06-20 15:30:10+00:00): Clarification: This is a strictly controlled Munitions area. Access is limited.
captain_slow (2017-06-22 13:56:39+00:00): sollte der raddna nicht erst am 1. juli umziehen? ich hatte den vorherigen shop gelöscht, weil mein gedanke war, dass man dann einfach am 1.7. den raddan-node von seinem alten standort an den neuen ziehen kann, sind ja nahe beieinander. ist das ein nicht so gerne gesehenes vorgehen?
captain_slow (2017-06-22 14:44:15+00:00): bin eben dort vorbeigefahren und habe gesehen dass die schon umgezogen sind, also ist das geklärt ;-)
dann ist nur noch meine frage bezüglich der mappingpraxis mit nodes verschieben oder lifecycle-präfixe und dann umtaggen (hab schon beides benutzt, weiss aber nicht welches die akzeptiertere variante ist).
gormur (2017-07-03 14:51:49+00:00): Any particular reason why you changed one out of over 30 ways of "Smalspåret" railway=preserved to railway=narrow_gauge?
(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25580533).
I would argue that railway=narrow_gauge should not be used at all...
geri-oc (2017-07-04 06:43:18+00:00): Hello gormur, I have directed to railway = *:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways (Narrow-gauge passenger or freight trains, often tourist / scenic routes. -> gauge = 891)

http://www.smalsparet.se/

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1643603#map=14/58.3712/15.3034 is a control track -> gauge = 1435.

Since it is a historical museum railway, I have edited this section - maybe it should be transferred to the route. But it can also be reverted, since I am only guest in this area.

Perhaps you can talk about this with https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Skinfaxi - he is there on site.

Greetings from Saxony - Germany - von Gerd
Skinfaxi (2017-07-05 11:33:47+00:00): Småspåret is a Railway wich is preserved by a local action group, but the Main reason is not the Heritage but the possiblity to reaktive it sometimes in the futur. Their transport service is saisonal but in this periode regulary and they are inkluderat in the normal public transport system to normale fees. The Railway is narrow
Skinfaxi (2017-07-08 10:17:21+00:00): Hör dom se deal with this issue now? It is for me totaly Clearwater that we shall have one solution from Jenny to Hultsfred. From Jenny to Västervik the rail is verry special (tre rails in one track i order to make it possible for normal and narrow gauge trains to use it)
Skinfaxi (2017-07-08 10:18:10+00:00): Sorry for My phones stupid correction ideas :)
geri-oc (2017-07-08 13:22:22+00:00): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2016_Kombinationsgleis_der_ehemaligen_Schmalspurbahn_in_Potschappel.jpg

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/186070587/history
gormur (2017-07-08 13:23:42+00:00): I think tagging narrow gauge railways as railway=narrow_gauge is just as silly as tagging a way with highway=steep just because it is steep (yes that was a thing in the early osm days). Such things as steepness and gauge has its own tags and should not interfere with the main tag (this case railway=*). So it it my opinion that Hultsfred-Jenny should be either railway=rail or railway=perserved (depending on amount/regularity of traffic).

Regarding the dual gauge section from Jenny to Västervik, this is already correctly tagged.
Skinfaxi (2017-07-17 06:10:07+00:00): i tried to clean upp. look att https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50340555#map=10/57.4449/15.9211 

The question is how to make clear that the usesage=branch is saisonal. I put same informationen (like wegsite and so on) away from the track and addet it instead in the relation för the whole route. I do not know if this is like it should be....
Skinfaxi (2017-07-17 06:12:49+00:00): gromur i tried to use the information in the wiki. i see your point but att forum.openstreetmap.org are discussions about this topic. It seems to be importend for same services like routeplanning for trains based on openstreetmap :)
gormur (2017-07-17 10:52:24+00:00): What do you think is the most important property of this railway? The fact that it is a museum railway with sporadic traffic, or that it is 891mm rather than 1435mm wide?

Regarding route planning: There are better mechanisms for route planning for railways than changing its tagging (The operator could publish a GTFS f.ex.)

In the mean time, your edit has now evolved into 8 ways of 'narrow_gauge' and 27 smaller ways of 'perserved'. Plus the bit of dual gauge that must remain as railway=rail...

I don't want to start an edit war, but can I revert both your edits back to railway=perserved (seasonal, museum), please?
Skinfaxi (2017-07-17 13:52:15+00:00): Gomur IF you för what you wan't it games to a best solution. I just tried to fix samething that an other person has started. I personaluthyrning think that usage=Link describes the actuell situation best because the railway has more trafik than the "inlandsbanan". But i am verry happy if samone cares about this issue. I only changed because i tought the situation after geri-oc changes was not Good. And IF this railway get a ref it has to be HVJ for Hultsfred Västervik Järnväg like it was called officiellt. So again: i am Lucky IF you take Care about this issue
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-02 11:51:33+00:00): HI Martin, in this and a preceding change you appear to have set a number of ways with ref A4420. If a road has an A ref, it needs to be set to highway=primary or trunk. Can you please review and update as appropriate?

Thanks,
Mike
Martin Wynne (2017-07-02 13:15:19+00:00): Hi Mike,
As I understand it, that applies to 3-figure A roads, not necessarily 4-figure roads?
This is a newly constructed road through a new housing development still under construction (on the site of a former sugar factory). I was surprised to see it given an A number - having driven along it I certainly wouldn't regard it as a primary or trunk road. Small roundabouts, and  with multiple residential side roads. A B number would have been more appropriate.
There is no significant primary or trunk east-west traffic between the A442 and A451 at this location, it is essentially local traffic.
Seeing how much was spent on it, I could have suggested much better uses for the money. No doubt the explanation is that it was covered by a Section 106 agreement with the developers.
cheers,
Martin.
freebeer (2018-05-12 08:57:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58897524 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal residence shelter spam
mueschel (2017-06-21 12:36:20+00:00): Hi,
dieser Tag hier stimmt leider auch nicht so ganz:
"access:agricultural:forward:conditional =	none @ maxweight"
Keine Gewichtsbeschränkung für landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge wäre

maxweight:forward:conditional = none @ agricultural

Grüße, Jan
Protoxenus (2017-06-21 18:30:23+00:00): habs geändert......
5m4u9 (2017-06-20 18:33:31+00:00): hola, gracias por colaborar...

qué nombre tiene esta institución pública? del estado central o del departamento?
Joske1020 (2026-01-18 00:10:21+00:00): gelet op de opmerking die ik hier 10 dagen geleden heb gemaakt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5121477 en het advies dat Thierry1030 daarin gaf aan mij,
Een combinatie van landuse=* en natural=* is niet opportuun, in geen enkele context. Gelieve hier mijn raad te volgen dat ik ook in mijn opmerking had gemaakt: "Iemand (in dit geval de persoon die het heeft veroorzaakt) moet er dus natural=wetland wetland=swamp van maken met wat inner ways van rietvelden en (natte) weiden, aangezien er  voornamelijk broekbossen zijn voor zover ik weet."
escada (2026-01-19 04:08:44+00:00): "Iemand (in dit geval de persoon die het heeft veroorzaakt)"
lijkt me onzin. Ik ben nog amper met OSM bezig, dus waarom zou ik daar tijd in steken?
Als u het anders wil zien, zal u het zelf moeten doen.
Joske1020 (2026-01-19 22:03:46+00:00): dat had ik niet door, sorry. Ik kan ook een compromis uitvoeren door landuse=forest te verwijderen en wetland=marsh in wetland=swamp
Joske1020 (2026-01-19 22:04:04+00:00): te veranderen
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 18:06:53+00:00): Revert changeset due to vandalism.
Zie forumtopic 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58795
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 18:13:28+00:00): Ik had je verzocht even niet te mappen, hier heb je geen gevolg aan gegeven. 
Er wordt serieus overwogen om een block te plaatsen op je edits. 
Overweeg je toekomstige edits goed, helaas zijn er veel Pokemon spelers die helaas niet de werkelijkheid in kaart brengen.
trial (2017-06-30 19:54:26+00:00): Bonjour, vous prétendez/tu prétends que la voie verte est une maison :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5264529/history
Je pourrais corriger mais je préfère le signaler car il y a peut-être un problème lors de l'utilisation de JOSM et donc d'autres cas de foirage (ce n'est pas la dernière édition qui est fautive).
trial (2017-12-22 17:26:41+00:00): corrigé
GinaroZ (2017-07-07 15:28:40+00:00): I have removed this data
aceman444 (2019-04-29 10:29:18+00:00): Hi, why did you tag ships on Danube in Bratislava as piers, when they aren't?
Also, the changeset description "Clean up of area close to Mileticova street" is quite inappropriate, as Danube is far from Mileticova street.
FacelessHorsey (2019-04-29 13:31:22+00:00): Hi, I've made changes both to Danube and the Miletičova street neighborhood. So I've mentioned both. I should have splitted it into two for easier review.

If the ships are tagged as ships they do not appear on the map as they are not permanent structures. However the ships are de facto permanent. They are stationary and function as buildings on water. Showing them on map better reflects reality. Unless there is a natural disaster they will always be there when someone comes visit.
aceman444 (2019-04-29 13:42:32+00:00): OSM forbids misusing tags just for making objects appear on the map (which one actually as there are many different renderings of OSM data?). Whether buildings or ships, they still aren't piers (you didn't even tag them as floating).
If you read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dship you would see that historic ships (as these were tagged) are assumed to be fixed at one place. They are not ferries or free ships roaming the waterways.
So none of your reasoning is correct and I have reverted the changes. Thanks for explanation.
FacelessHorsey (2019-04-29 15:27:46+00:00): Oh, ok thank you for your assistance.
Tractor (2017-06-21 19:15:50+00:00): Jeg er usikker på om det er riktig å bruke lanes=2 på sykkelveger. Sykkelfelt på vanlig veg regnes normalt ikke som "lane". Vet ikke hvordan det da blir med felt på en sykkelveg... 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lanes
NKA (2017-06-21 19:55:07+00:00): Jeg måtte også sjekke på forhånd og mener at dette er riktig. Jeg har bare lagt inn lanes=2 der sykkelveien er oppmerket med 2 distinkte felt for de to kjøreretningene med gul stripe i mellom.

Sykkelfelt på vanlig veg kan godt være en egen lane (men behøver ikke), se f.eks. her: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes#Crossing_with_a_designated_lane_for_bicycles

Noen av disse ekspress-sykkelveiene i Oslo var allerede tagget med lanes=2, så andre må også ha tenkt slik. Det har ikke vært så vanlig frem til nylig, men det blir nok flere av slike sykkelveier fremover.
NKA (2017-06-21 21:21:54+00:00): Jeg sjekket litt videre. I følge Overpass Turbo er det 3.000 cycleways globalt som også har lanes=2, blant annet den kjente "Venice Beach bike path":
https://www.wheredoitakethekids.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/theStrand-07.jpg
Tractor (2017-06-22 20:07:11+00:00): OK, jeg gir meg! :-)
Alecs01 (2020-01-27 18:12:15+00:00): Hi, why are you mapping areas such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502158853 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/502158062 as landuse=farmyard ? I don't believe they came close to the wiki definition https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard
Filohipo (2020-01-28 12:19:15+00:00): Corrected.  Filipe Neto is not an active mapper since 2017
Alecs01 (2020-01-28 16:55:48+00:00): Thanks for the correction! If you are a local and have enough time, this tag is spread through the whole city centre.
topolusitania (2020-01-28 18:52:18+00:00): Already detected. Local mappers already warned.
Same warning published in OSM mailing listTalk-pt and OSMPortugal (Telegram)
Alecs01 (2020-01-28 20:18:26+00:00): Thank you!
bhousel (2017-06-20 19:09:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
John-O (2017-09-03 20:20:44+00:00): Thanks for your edit. Any idea what has happened to the service-road, which now appears beneath the motorway slip road?

https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=86&error=102286504
tms13 (2018-01-09 16:20:12+00:00): Now updated from latest aerial photos.
Hjart (2017-06-20 18:36:30+00:00): Bemærk at alle danske fortidsminder fornylig er blevet importeret til wikidata (se https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q30123746).
Jeg vil mene det vil være en fordel at have relevante wikidata tags i stedet for de source.url tags du hidtil har brugt
Leif Lodahl (2017-06-20 19:08:06+00:00): Hej Hjart,
Tak for info.
Jeg er enig i at jeg bør tilføje Wikidata.
Det vil godt nok gøre arbejdet noget mere besværligt, da jeg har rundt regnet 80.000 elementer der skal lægges ind.
Det vil fordoble stykprisen ;-)

/Leif
Hjart (2017-06-20 19:18:58+00:00): Bemærk at det i JOSM er væsentligt nemmere at tilføje wikidata tags (der kræves kun 2 museklik) end source.url tags og at det i iD tilsyneladende ikke lader sig gøre nær så nemt som i JOSM.
hedanix (2017-06-20 19:46:37+00:00): Hallo zusammen,

dies ist mein erstes Changeset bei OSM, falls es etwas auszusetzen gibt - bitte los.

Nach dem Upload, und damit nach dem Schließen des Changesets, ist mir aufgefallen, dass ich mich im Kommentar dazu ungenau ausgedrückt habe. Das Betreten des NSG ist nicht überall im Rheinbogen verboten, ist aber absolut verboten in dem von mir bearbeiteten ca. 100m breiten Uferstreifen vom Ufer bis Viehweide/Wiese - ab dem von mir eingetragenen Schild im Norden (Nähe Fähranleger) bis zur südlichen Grenze.

Gibt es eine Möglichkeit den Kommentar nachträglich zu ändern? Ich glaube zu ist zu, oder? 

Gruß
hedanix