piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
clay_c (2021-05-07 19:50:17+00:00): The stations you changed to tram stops do in fact have dedicated platforms, with tactile pavement and everything. They even have separate wheelchair-accessible platforms. This is in contrast to the various tram stops in San Francisco, for example, which are literally curbside signposts with no extra infrastructure. Such stops are seldom seen on light rail systems built after the '70s.

Other RTD light rail stations do not have enclosing structures. I don't think that's a reasonable criterion to demote them to tram stops.

This system seems to share a lot in common with the light rail stations in downtown Houston, Portland, and Calgary. Operationally, trains always stop at these stations regardless of whether passengers are boarding or exiting. That alone suggests that these should be `railway=station`.

In good faith, I've reverted these changes [1]. Perhaps this needs more discussion with mappers in Colorado. chachafish [2] has done some work on RTD rail; maybe he can help you out.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104338636

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/chachafish
colgza (2021-05-07 19:52:47+00:00): 👍
colgza (2021-06-13 16:00:58+00:00): I'd like to dispute your reverting of this changeset. I do not think it was the right decision despite the reasons you provided. I would still consider these to be "more a tram stop than a railway halt" because of their ≤300 meter proximity between each other, their alignment to the curb on separate streets, and their lack of a clear entrance and exit or exit.
clay_c (2021-06-13 16:36:22+00:00): Hi Colin,

As much as I want to engage in this discussion, I'm actually on vacation right now. Do you mind if we pick it up in a couple weeks (around the 27th)? I'll be able to put more thought and effort into this one I'm back home.

-Clay
colgza (2021-06-13 16:55:22+00:00): That's fine.

The appropriate place to continue this conversation is in this discussion page:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:railway%3Dtram_stop#.22where_the_halt_resembles_more_a_tram_stop_than_a_railway_halt.22
RicoElectrico (2021-04-25 21:06:06+00:00): Cześć, opis nie zgadza się z tym co ta edycja naprawdę zawiera. Został przesunięty adres i tylko tyle.

Podgląd zmian: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103582199

Jeśli potrzebujesz pomocy w dodaniu punktu do mapy, to śmiało napisz.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-08-08 10:45:02+00:00): Hallo Garstig,

du hast hier www.osm.org/way/935067895 als tourism=alpine_hut getaggt. Eine Berghütte muss zwingend (u. a.) Übernachtungsplätze und Essen anbieten. Und es muss permanent ein Hüttenwart präsent sein, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut . Trifft das hier wirklich zu? Das sieht für mich eher nach amenity=shelter aus. Daneben ist doch sogar Skaterrampen. Spricht für mich für einen Unterstand.

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
Garstig (2021-08-08 11:29:11+00:00): Hallo Ze0zohk1, Du hast völlig recht, da habe ich mich wohl vertippt. Ich habe es bereits korrigiert. Danke und Gruss - Garstig
Ze0zohk1 (2021-08-08 14:20:41+00:00): Vielen Dank dir
ALu68 (2021-05-02 09:38:02+00:00): Die Bank -- the bench
Kovoschiz (2021-04-26 11:50:56+00:00): You removed the names, not adding them
Kovoschiz (2021-04-26 11:51:13+00:00): Please fix your own application if you want to show `name:en=`
Ser9ei (2021-04-25 17:31:18+00:00): без тега building=* контур здания заправки не будет отображаться на карте => https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284139298
Silenttouch (2021-04-25 20:51:02+00:00): Добавил, спасибо
RussNelson (2021-04-27 15:46:07+00:00): Of course there are no tracks left -- that's why it's an abandoned right-of-way. However, there is still an embankment visible on the LIDAR, so ... it should be left there.
Lucia Argento (2021-04-27 17:25:41+00:00): Ottimo lavoro! verifica solo di ortogonalizzare tutte le geometrie (selezionando ogni singolo edificio e poi tasto "Q" dalla tastiera.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103583709
G_P_J (2021-05-05 12:45:30+00:00): Cześć, w jakim calu zmieniasz podjazdy do zabudowań na drogi polne/dojazdy do pól? Dlaczego dajesz adresy do obiektów, które adresów nie posiadają, jednocześnie duplikując istniejące punkty adresowe, np. tu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=550622165#map=19/52.99758/18.22774 ? Adresy w miejscowościach bez nazwanych ulic powinny mieć umieszczoną nazwę miejscowości w znaczniku add:place zamiast addr:city. Wszystkie znaczniki znajdziesz w edytorze iD po lewej stronie na dole klikając "Wszystkie znaczniki".
ISBM (2021-05-05 13:28:03+00:00): Cześć. Z podjazdami - tu się zgodzę. Natomiast, co do adresów: wyszedłem z założenia, ze wszystkie zabudowania na danej posesji maja ten sam numer. Co do znaczników - dzięki za uwagę.
Pozdrawiam
G_P_J (2021-05-05 13:51:52+00:00): Punkt adresowy jest przypisany do jednego budynku, najczęściej mieszkalnego. Nie ma potrzeby duplikowania go na inne obiekty w obrębie gospodarstwa. Źródłowe punkty adresowe z Geoportalu możesz zobaczyć wybierając odpowiednią warstwę po prawej stronie na dole.
user_5239402 (2021-04-26 02:34:46+00:00): 안녕하세요
제발 하양"역"을 이름에 기입하지 마세요.
역명 뒤에 --"역"을 넣는건 금지되여 있습니다. 이 규칙은 전세계적으로 똑같이 적용됩니다.
그냥 하양 만 기입하면 됩니다.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-04-26 12:36:14+00:00): Ciao Michele, building=detached è una casa indipendente (che non ha parti in comune con altri) che ospita una singola famiglia. Tu l'hai usato anche per edifici commerciali addossati ad altri edifici. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103584104
mikki65 (2021-04-26 21:57:45+00:00): un edificio ho visto correggo grazie
mikki65 (2021-04-26 21:58:58+00:00):  l ho fatto con streetcomplete e non si pu' corregere mentre cammini devi farlo  su id
mikki65 (2021-04-26 22:11:32+00:00): non  capisco a quale edificio e' da correggere o lo hai gia' ncorretto tu???
Andrea Musuruane (2021-04-27 06:29:39+00:00): Ho già corretto io :-)
clay_c (2021-05-07 19:51:00+00:00): Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104338636

See discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103581943
wielandb (2021-06-05 22:21:09+00:00): Heyho,

ich gehe davon aus, dass das Spielfeld mitten durch den Brunnen versehentlich eingefügt wurde, oder?
jese (2021-06-07 13:11:14+00:00): Vermutlich. Habe leider Probleme, Änderungsübersichten leicht zu visualisieren. Wird schon stimmen, was du machst … Danke für die Korrektur.
wielandb (2021-06-07 14:53:30+00:00): Kein Ding. Fehler macht jeder. :) Danke für deine Mitarbeit an der Karte!
Koen VO (2021-05-19 11:05:25+00:00): Hallo Robin. Dit pad loopt over een private weide en zelfs het pad in het park is eigenlijk (nog) niet echt toegankelijk. Misschien voorlopig nog best verwijderen...
RobinManh (2021-05-19 16:41:03+00:00): Ik zal het momenteel dan als een privaat pad aanduiden.
Koen VO (2021-05-20 06:49:01+00:00): In de weide is het zelfs geen pad, je loopt daar de boer zijn gras en dus zijn geld plat en met daar aan te duiden dat het een pad is faciliteer je dat. Dat gaat ook echt in tegen de guidelines.
pio2_122 (2021-04-25 21:28:48+00:00): Brak źródła i prawidłowego opisu zmiany = wycofane.
colgza (2021-04-25 17:42:03+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dhalt
eggie (2021-04-25 18:16:49+00:00): Dag ILH
proposed =cycleway heb ik maar verwijderd. Je geeft immers aan dat het al aangelegd is. 
Ook een verbindingsstukje met Ranonkelstraat heb ik ontdaan van proposed. 

Je zegt Ik ben er langs gefietst, maar ook er over. Maw is het wel gereed? 

MVG
eggie
Iloveyouhamburgers (2021-04-25 19:51:37+00:00): Dag Eggie,

Ik ben er vandaag overheen gefietst. Was nog niet voorzien van markering, maar verder geheel gereed.
eggie (2021-04-25 19:55:31+00:00): Top!
woodpeck (2021-04-28 11:46:24+00:00): Does it really make sense to import buildings with an amount of detail like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/935085672 (note the little "chink" in the northern wall... probably 10 or 20cm in reality...)?
NKA (2021-04-29 15:46:04+00:00): You are right, buildings in OSM does not need this detail. The threshold for the shortest walls in this import is set to 0.2m. Thousands of nodes have already been removed below that thresholds.

I have tested several higher thresholds and other parameters for weeks, but they all produce other problems in a number of cases when a corner is removed (strange inner corners, rectification problems etc). So 0.2m was a compromise between removing unnecessary detail and keeping the general shape of the building.

Also, I would rather keep a little extra detail made by humans (the import data) than replace that with too much machine generated fixes.

In any case, most buildings in the import are very simple, the majority with only 4 corners.
olo81 (2021-11-28 20:23:03+00:00): skąd bierzesz lokalizacje drzew? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8665406606
ewidentnie coś z nimi jest nie tak
jfd553 (2026-05-08 17:20:01+00:00): The fairways and greens overlap with "landuse=grass" tag, which causes an error message in JOSM. Could you correct this?
Famlam (2021-04-25 18:07:18+00:00): Residential herstelt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103586026
SherbetS (2021-05-05 16:12:15+00:00): Thank you
Claudius Henrichs (2021-05-05 07:52:56+00:00): Hi,
I cannot see any construction on the ground for the Rasht-Gorgan Motorway that you added on the Mapbox Satellite imagery that you mentioned as source. Neither on Bing nor Maxar. Do you have another source?
Theodin (2021-04-28 10:31:56+00:00): Danke fürs Eintragen!
Wollte ich eigentlich gerade machen und hab den Node nicht gefunden, da ich nach roten gesucht habe...

LG, Theodin
canfe (2021-04-26 04:45:32+00:00): Son effettivamente ponti con spallette o son del culvert?
Skinoku (2021-04-26 08:05:47+00:00): Ciao, hai ragione, devo verificare.
Apro una nota per ricordarmi, appena posso passo e verifico.
A presto
canfe (2021-04-27 10:16:12+00:00): Se metti un fixme è meglio così "riappare" anche su OSMOSE
Skinoku (2021-04-27 18:05:56+00:00): Certo hai ragione... provvedo!
canfe (2021-05-16 15:48:06+00:00): Ma alla fine li passiamo come ponti? hanno le spallette?
Skinoku (2021-05-16 16:53:47+00:00): Sì sì hanno le spallette sono identici a quello che ti avevo mandato in foto solo che in zona c'era tantissima gente non mi andava di fermarmi a fotografarli direttamente ambedue hanno le spallette
canfe (2021-05-17 13:38:04+00:00): Sistemati!
stefanct (2021-06-30 21:29:45+00:00): Hi,
super, dass du so viele POIs einträgst, aber bitte keine Fantasienamen taggen, sondern nur echte Eigennamen mappen. "Toi Toi" ist offensichtlich Unsinn, "Car Wash" heißt eigentlich Carwash4you, der Skatepark heißt soweit ich weiß auch nicht so und den Engerthof hast du auf einen falschen Namen "ausgebessert"...
scrts (2021-07-02 13:03:29+00:00): Hallo!

"Skatepark Donaupark" und "Engerth-Hof" habe ich vor Ort so auf Aufschriften bzw. Schildern wahrgenommen. "Toi Toi" ist der Name einer Mobilklo-Firma, habe ich auf deren Klos eingetragen, wo ich ihn gesehen habe. "Car Wash" weiß ich jetzt nicht mehr, kann ich mich nicht mehr erinnern.

LG
Jose Luis Infante (2021-04-26 11:26:08+00:00): Hola,
moltes gràcies per les teves edicions, encara que cal afegir més dades, no solsament el nom i la descripció. Cada element a OSM té unes etiquetes per classificar-lo. Així, un edifici es dibuixa com un àrea i té l'etiqueta building, o si és històric, l'etiqueta historic. Si tens dubtes tens la wiki d'OSM a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org o la comunitat catalana a t.me/osmcat .
Salutacions!
Ficky IRM-RV (2021-06-10 00:52:23+00:00): hi Victor 2015,
can you confirm this restriction relation role (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/12084944)? relation missing a "to" member. there is only "from" and "via".
Thank you, happy mapping!
thopf (2021-04-25 21:00:00+00:00): Hallo martin-martin!

Birke ist nicht der Eigenname des Baumes, sondern eine biologische Gattungsbezeichnung. Für die biologischen Gattungs- und Artbezeichnungen existiert ein eigener "species"-Tag. Ich habe es für den Baum schon ausgebessert.

LG,
thopf.
martin-martin (2021-04-26 06:36:54+00:00): Vielen dank für die Info und deinen Edit! :)
jaap de vries (2021-04-26 11:49:31+00:00): Klopt je aanpassing bij KPN wel? 
Nu staat er een kleding winkel terwijl de website dat het om een telecomwinkel gaat.
Henk de Jong 01 (2021-04-26 14:50:23+00:00): Sorry, aangepast naar telecomwinkel.
Super-Map (2021-04-26 10:39:48+00:00): It's appear, you don't like my "WORK"!... So, if you are able to do "better", do it!... it's 'easy to "destroy" something, harder to make "better, harder for a "children", but you "aren't"... So when you touch something it's for to "improve it", not the contrary... I don't like to feel to loose my time... and for me, I want to see this project to go FORWARD and not "backward"!... It's a great project, and if I was the "manager" of this project since the beginning, we will have just to make "up date" on lot of area, cities, town and so on...
Scale and Scope (2021-04-29 19:41:18+00:00): LeTopographeFou talks less and already does better (more precise) landuses than Super-Map ... https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103588968
LeTopographeFou (2021-04-30 18:25:25+00:00): Hi Super-map, I must admit I don't fully understand your message... OSM is a collaborative project where everyone is free to add its details (as soon as it is relevent and true of course) and where everyone disserves to be treated kindly. I don't understand why you shoot at me. You even forget to tell me what you think is wrong in my changeset... I'm not afraid at all by you but I can imagine how such a poor comment can afraid new comers. Glad to hear you are not the manager, I'm not either.

Now regarding my contribution there was an overlapping of different landuses and of motorways. As a first step it is valuable data (= better than no landuse) but it lacks some accuracy. I refined the residential landuse area in order to fix some of those approximations (less overlapping, exclusion of a part of the motorway). I don't think I broke any relation/multipolygon but I may be wrong.

Can you please explain what I've done wrong ?

Thank you Scale and scope for your comment.
Super-Map (2021-05-03 10:27:50+00:00): If you haven't "time", it's simple, put a "note" one the map or "FIXME"!...
Super-Map (2021-05-03 10:32:34+00:00): Hi Scale and Scope  and WELCOME! Rule number one, don't try to go too faster and follow the "WIKI", thanks for your "comment", have a nice day!
LeTopographeFou (2021-05-14 20:30:57+00:00): Hi Super-Map, let put aside off-topic comments on Covid, crisis, democracy... to focus on mapping. I'm sincerily sorry to hear that you are suffering from the situation (and please imagine that I might also suffer...) but please here focus on what is related to mapping.

1. Once again OSM is a collaborative project. You can disagree with my changeset and say so (politely) here or in a mailing list, I've no problem to argue and maybe change my way of mapping (and please be ready also to challenge yours). But please remember that we all disserve respect in our discussions and that writing in capital cases, forgetting basic "Hi, hello...", always consider I'm your ennemy and blame me for the current crisis and all its side effects will not bring any credibility to your point of view here. See Code of conduct on wiki.

2. Your translation of "Île-de-France" as being "residential area" is very original, especially when we know that it is a region covered mainly (around 75% according to Wikipedia) by fields and woods. You might think that Ile-de-France = Paris viewed from where you live in but, again, no.

3. I maintain my point of view and my changeset. A6 highway is not a residential area... it is not a field area... it is not an industrial area... In fact no landuse has been defined yet for such wide areas. Please have a look at the wiki which explains that it is "An area of land dedicated to, or having predominantly residential buildings such as houses or apartment buildings" and that "The extent of the area should mark the boundary of known residential use, not the extent of the whole town or village.". I'm pretty sure we can both agree that motorway trunks are not a "small road". And I'm sure I can find many other rationales to this change.

So, if you think I'm the Evil you are describing, feel free to contact mailing list or DWG for arbitration.
Super-Map (2021-05-21 19:40:59+00:00): Oh! YOUR SO KIND!... First, your "wrong", secondly: "your wrong"... And I haven't' any more explanation for you, because I'm not a "teacher".... I receive "no wage" for to IMPROVE this map and not the contrary... and YES it's Île de FRANCE.... And when you spent many "minutes" for to make a "big hole" on the map, when it's so easy and fast to "represent" the area... it's for all except for to improve this map... I insist, I'm not your "teacher" than any body else, I can "help", but for lot of reasons you can wait as long than me........................ I have no more explanation for you.... ...."Please have a look at the wiki"???? That's so funny, I have READ the WIKI better than ANY BODY... And as you know it an "OPEN"project, translation: "it evolve constantly" toward the "future" not the past!.... Effectively OSM is a collaborative project. Collaborative for to "improve it", even so, everybody can make "mistakes"... when it's a "mistake"! I know why I map and why I do that "correctly".... But I'm sure equally, even if some time you have bad "behaviors", you're probably not a "barbarian"... like it's exist so many on this planet and not elsewhere.... However, all the world haven't yet hear about this project, even lot of others.... Of course I'm "enduring" the situation, but as you know so well it exist always "worse" elsewhere... I talk about COVID19, of course... And poor country know so well and will know how they will be "affected" by this crisis! Even us!... But I understand, you're a "little maper" since 2015... I'm sorry, but it's not against you, but due to the stupidity of the human being I can't help you, like anybody else... I don't think a minute you're my "enemy", but if all persons will respect the "goal" of this map, many others around the world could be "helped" and them life "improved"... I have read the Wiki even more... Everybody can make mistake, but when it's not.................... Have a nice week end.
Super-Map (2021-05-21 19:49:09+00:00): I know, you use: "StreetComplete 31.3"... Look the map before to make any change... I can't help you even if "apparently" you like this project and we share the same "passion"... I can give you more "explanations"...
Super-Map (2021-05-21 19:53:44+00:00): I "cant" give you, precisely... I don't like this project, I LOVE it! Because I know the "goal"... and  because you must "thinking", before to make anything and avoid to make more "mistakes" on the map and you must "thinking" for to be able to make lot of "corrections"...
MrMoehritz (2021-04-25 19:47:57+00:00): Hi Bernhard W,

mist ich habe ebenfalls gerade angefangen da zu editieren und jetzt Konflikte :-( Hast du noch Dinge die du Ändern wirst?
MrMoehritz (2021-04-25 19:48:19+00:00): dann würde ich noch warten mit dem hochladen
Bernhard W (2021-04-25 19:59:08+00:00): Hallo MrMoehritz, ich war heute dort und habe angefangen, einiges zu ergänzen und zu korrigieren. Jetzt mache ich erst Mal Pause, du kannst also starten, ohne dass ich dazwischenfunke. Viel Spaß.
MrMoehritz (2021-04-25 20:15:38+00:00): Danke dir! Wenn ich dich richtig verstanden habe, hast du die Wege von der Landnutzung getrennt, weil das sonst schwerer zu editieren ist. Ich mag es persönlich anders rum, hab es aber nicht geändert, denn das ist ja hier eine community und meins ist nicht richtiger :-) Ich habe aber die Landnutzungen aneinandergeklebt, die direkt aneinander grenzen. Beim info-schild "Streuobstwiese" reichte der See bis zur Bank, das ist der 'Fehler' den ich korrigiert habe.

Kannst du bei Gelegenheit mal sehen, ob das für dich i.O. ist und ob beim Mergen nichts kaputt gegangen ist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103589638 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103590348?

Besten Gruß!
Bernhard W (2021-04-25 21:31:18+00:00): Das werde ich in den nächsten Tagen nochmal anschauen. Dort gibt es noch einiges mehr zu tun. 
Wenn Weglinien unter Flächenrändern liegen, kann man die Weglinien im Editor JOSM zum Teil nicht mal sehen. Teilen oder zusammenfügen der Weglinien ist praktisch nicht möglich. Bei meinen Edits sind die Ränder der Flächen an den Flächengrenzen, nicht in der Wegmitte. Zum Verkleben würde ich bei Wegen die Wegfläche ergänzen mit area:highway=*. 
Linien und Flächen trenne ich aber nur, wenn ich einen Weg editiere, ansonsten lasse ich das so, wie es der Mapper erstellt hat. Zusammenkleben von angrenzenden Flächen ist kein Problem.
jaap de vries (2021-04-26 11:55:03+00:00): Het eetcafe de Nar is allang gesloten. Bistro de Bon zit hier. Pas je het aan? https://www.eet.nu/den-bosch/bistro-bon
jaap de vries (2021-04-26 11:58:14+00:00): De website van Sami's is ook onjuist, het moet deze zijn. https://www.samyseethuis.nl/ Let je op met google maps? Deze mag je niet zomaar overnemen voor OSM gebruik en bevat vele fouten.
jaap de vries (2021-04-26 12:01:35+00:00): Nog een nabrander, als je telefoonnummers toevoegt let je dan op de 0 na het landnummer +31 die mag dan weg. Dus voor Den Bosch +3173.... ipv +31037
jaap de vries (2021-04-29 06:21:29+00:00): Ik heb de rest zelf even aangepast.
Henk de Jong 01 (2021-04-29 17:16:22+00:00): Mijn dank. Zou ik ook jouw hulp mogen inroepen bij het juist weergeven van het Koestraatje en Achter de Wereld? Dit ligt in de hoek van de Verwerstraat en de Peperstraat en staat niet goed op de kaart.
Henk de Jong 01 (2021-04-29 17:20:59+00:00): Daarnaast denk ik dat ik, wanneer ik weer fatsoenlijk kan lopen, eens blok voor blok noteer welke zaak daar nu zit in dat blok. Het is even wat werk, maar ik ben dan wel bezig. Is ook wat waard..
DiaouligRu (2021-05-27 13:54:18+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai remarqué que vous aviez récemment supprimé plus de 200 tags "name:br" dans le pays nantais. Vos descriptions pour ces changesets étaient : "Suppression des nom Breton qui n'ont lieu d'être ici" ou "Suppression du nom Breton".

Pour votre information, le principe de localisation/référencement des toponymes et odonymes dans OSM est quelque chose de tout à fait normal mais parfois trop méconnu (cf. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Localization, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#France et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name:br). Des noms de lieux en langue bretonne sont utilisés un peu partout dans le monde (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/name:br#map). Des contributeurs sont en train de muscler ces aspects liés à la langue bretonne au travers du site http://www.openstreetmap.bzh/.

Je viens de corriger les suppressions des tags "name:br" que vous aviez occasionnées.
VA00 (2022-04-19 05:24:00+00:00): No to żeś poprawił obrys. Był poprawnie wprowadzony wg GPS, a Ty wrysowałeś stary nieaktualny zasięg wg. orto.
VA00 (2022-04-19 05:24:56+00:00): https://aleung.github.io/osm-visual-history/#/way/663013505
sbtn_ (2021-04-27 09:28:35+00:00): Calazo paper map used as to confirm elevation for one particular node. Main source for all Nodes in changeset is Lantmäteriet CC0 data.
rthik007 (2021-04-26 04:45:37+00:00): Hi matunk,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with highways way 178423953, way 820872662.Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103600553
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103589408
Bernhard W (2021-04-25 21:16:51+00:00): MrMoehritz, die stepping_stones sehen gut aus, die wollte ich in den nächsten Tage auch ergänzen, das brauche ich nun nicht mehr. :-)
Du mit dem Maxar-Bild gearbeitet, das ist allerdings ein paar Meter verschoben, demzufolge hast du auch den Steg verschoben.
MrMoehritz (2021-04-25 21:23:06+00:00): ah, das tut mir Leid, könntest du das wieder grade rücken?