piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Leumas-69 (2021-05-18 20:19:06+00:00): Nee, dat weet ik ook nog niet. Best nog even afwachten. De vervallen site is ondertussen tegen de grond https://imgur.com/gallery/gLqv8Dl en er gaan nog paden en delen  verschijnen die eigenlijk in nog aanleg zijn en/of zijn afgezet. De aangebrachte namen zijn mij voorlopig vreemd maar of die allen naar het punt in het stukje in het nieuwe bloemekenspark2 gaan verwijzen, geen idee. 1 aanpassing die op komst is is de verbinding vanaf het brugje aan het indigopad zuidwaarts evenwijdig met de Lieve naar de Nieuwe vaart, wat vorig jaar een shortcut was voor fiets en voetverkeer langs het geklasseerde deel van FNO.  Daar staat momenteel nog een hek en een blockage.
BCNorwich (2021-04-30 16:26:18+00:00): Please stop and correct the problems of undefined ways.
aweech (2021-05-01 15:56:51+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your two edits in Marysvale, as you requested, and I think that they are both good. Happy mapping!
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:26:00+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103924783
Glassman (2021-04-30 20:26:14+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103924969
mapper377 (2021-04-30 16:49:35+00:00): The changeset comment should say that the destination area for these two power lines is Fostoria, OH, not Fremont, OH.
Foomandoonian (2021-05-01 12:08:52+00:00): Hi Thomas. Could you possibly restore way 96616439 that you deleted in this edit? Please check your messages for details.
Foomandoonian (2021-05-01 13:19:41+00:00): I have restored the retail area.
◪ Jarv (2021-05-01 16:41:28+00:00): I removed the retail area since the area is covers is not retail. A very small amount of of it actually retail and can be mapped case by case where it is a retail area. The retail area seems to be mostly pedestrian surface
◪ Jarv (2021-05-01 16:49:04+00:00): Just saw the first message you sent. I understand now why you want to keep it for now. However for your awareness it isn't mapped in the correct place for the pedestrian surface. If using Bing it need an offset of (4.63; -2.84) at Hove Lawns and (4.48; -2.24) at the Aquarium.
Foomandoonian (2021-05-01 18:25:46+00:00): Thank you, that's very useful to know. This improper use of the retail area has been present for many years now so I figure that a little while longer while I draw out an accurate pedestrian area won't hurt.
Foomandoonian (2021-05-02 17:18:04+00:00): Can I ask where those offset values are available or how I might derive them myself? I have been trying to get to the bottom of that for a while...

Happy to communicate via OSM messages, email or whatever is most convenient to you.
TomCerts (2021-04-30 18:15:37+00:00): Esri Clarity used for alignments
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-05-01 06:51:23+00:00): Ich würde hier das access=private auch entfernen, wenn es kein Schild gibt, dass das Betreten/Benutzen verbietet. Immerhin dient der Weg als öffentliche Zufahrt zu 3 Häusern, oder?
DaveF (2021-05-02 15:54:13+00:00): All public transport station are mapped please don't add duplicates.
JeroenvanderGun (2021-04-30 17:11:51+00:00): Hier nog een extra bron: https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2019-39419.html
portalaventura (2021-04-30 17:03:52+00:00): gustavodim, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade do Rio Grande do Sul mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmrs.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
gurglypipe (2021-04-30 21:56:33+00:00): What’s the state of the site on the ground now? Has it been completely razed, or is the area still demarcated/fenced from other things? If the latter, I’d be tempted to keep the area in OSM and keep it marked as abandoned (as you have done), and change its name to old_name. Just like with a vacant shop. If the site gets reused in future, the area in OSM can be reused with its tags updated.
Artasen (2021-05-02 11:48:13+00:00): The only signs are the overgrown tracks, All buildings have been removed. The area is still fenced off though; I can send you a photo? Is it possible to put a photo or link in this discussion?. It closed in about 2015; given how much the has reverted to nature I'm inclined to delete it completely. Unlike old abandoned railways or quarries which leave a near permanent mark on the lanscape this area would not be noticed at all if you didnt know it was there!
gurglypipe (2021-05-03 11:42:22+00:00): I don’t think it’s possible to put a photo in a discussion, but you could link to a photo on geograph.org.uk (or similar).

I’d be inclined to leave the area in OSM, and the fence, but change the tagging from tourism=zoo to demolished:tourism=zoo using the lifecycle prefix scheme (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix). That means it probably won’t be rendered on the map, but the area data is still in OSM for if/when it gets bought and turned into something new. The existing boundaries would likely remain as-is in that case.
Artasen (2021-05-03 13:54:44+00:00): Your suggestion sounds like a agreeable compromise, thanks I'll add demolished to the tags and put a photo in geograph.org next time I go past. Interestingly Google streetview still shows it as it was in 2006-2010, gives an indication of how often its updated. https://earth.google.com/web/@54.15213186,-3.22891386,28.22658539a,0d,60y,355.27199315h,85.93947865t,0r/data=IhoKFlpkS2pQb25XUUdZeVZGYnBIbjJwNFEQAg
archpdx (2021-04-30 19:01:05+00:00): Hi iana24,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for your work in trying to make OSM more accurate. I noticed that you added a note about the maximum length for this bridge and the adjacent roadway. I've added maxlength 'tags' on top of the notes you've added, and it will be of best practice to use these in the future. This is because notes are usually used for other editors, and not viewers of the map. When you select a roadway, you will be able to see the 'tags' by scrolling all the way to the bottom.

Additional information can be found on the wiki here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxlength

Feel free to respond to my comment if you need any help with this. Happy mapping!

Best regards,
archpdx
Romwriter (2021-04-30 19:19:45+00:00): Dear Marc Mongenet, Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. However, I do not find any improvement of the map in this changeset. The aerial imagery shows that the OSM data matched the real street positions much better before your edit. Would you mind to explain your changeset to me?
Marc Mongenet (2021-04-30 21:33:19+00:00): Hello, I added about 100 nodes because the curves were very rough. For the alignement, as you can in the changeset, I used the imagery visible in iD editor. Maybe it is not well aligned. But only some roads were not well aligned with the Bing imagery in iD, so I am really not sure. Of course, bridges are always a problem in aerial pictures, so I am not sure which alignement is better. On which aerial imagery do you check te alignement?
Romwriter (2021-05-02 10:16:47+00:00): True, the curves in the map data were rougher than actual driving GPS tracks. The reason was that the map data matched the imagery quite good where lanes merge. If you want to map the curves in more detail, please consider adding the "placement" key where appropriate, rather than simply smoothen them. --- cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:placement
aweech (2021-05-01 16:06:01+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed your edits by Wayne High, as you requested, and I think that they're good for the most part. Just so you know, there's a way to make buildings you edit have nice, neat right angles like they do in real life. If you select a feature and press the "q" button on the keyboard, it will make the angles into right angles for you. Happy mapping!
Vinber-Pro (2021-05-03 14:10:08+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,
merci pour vos contributions, si vous souhaitez plus d'info 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Bonne journée
portalaventura (2021-04-30 17:34:50+00:00): MAAR1975, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade do Rio de Janeiro mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmrj.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
TomCerts (2021-04-30 18:14:53+00:00): Esri Clarity used for alignments
user_11418917 (2021-05-01 13:30:24+00:00): Dear shahrokhmoj,         
Here in OSM profanity words are not welcomed. Your edit was reverted and reported to the data team.      
Please don't use such words or change something without discussing things in major and critical parts of the map.
woodpeck (2021-05-01 16:53:31+00:00): In addition, this changeset seems to be using a custom imagery layer that points to Google aerial imagery, something which is not permitted when editing OpenStreetMap. While this is unlikely to be the source for this particular change, edits based on this imagery source would have to be removed anyway.
user_11418917 (2021-05-04 12:26:45+00:00): @shahrokhmoj          STOP ADDING SPAM AND PROFANITY WORDS TO OSM!               
We saw your edit from the other sock puppet account:                       
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104067400
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103928186
Jakob48 (2021-05-01 11:30:01+00:00): Hallo Aljosa,

willkommen bei OSM.

Ich nehme an Du versteht Deutsch.

Bei der Durchsicht der Changeset ist mir aufgefallen, dass Du als Newcomer mit iD Editor versuchst Relationen zu bearbeiten. Das klappt offensichtlich nicht besonders gut. Das soll jetzt keine Kritik sein.

Ich möchte Dir empfehlen in JOSM zu verwenden. In JOSM gibt es einen konfortablen Editor für Relationen.

iD ist zum Bearbeiten von Relationen ungeeignet.

Dies ist mein Tipp

Gruß
Jakob48
portalaventura (2021-04-30 17:53:05+00:00): LFSantosgeo, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de São Paulo mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmsp.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
Frans S (2022-10-13 13:10:41+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.  However, the majority of the buildings are not well squared!

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103929097
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-30 18:09:52+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 103705425, 103706209, 103711124, 103711244, 103711295, 103711418, 103787353, 103787743, 103787899, 103875365, 103920987.
StefanHRT (2021-04-30 18:46:10+00:00): Hello. The access was fine. You can't get there unless you have a permit to go to the vaccination centre. With your change you have cleared the way for everyone again
gknisely (2021-05-01 01:28:30+00:00): Hello Stefan.  I had no idea that this airport had closed and is now used as a vaccination site.  A user reported that they could not get out of the site and it was due to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8039688 having access=no. Also, I thought someone accidentally changed the other ways to have private access based on openstreetcam.  My apologies.  Should I revert the access on the other ways and leave the access=no off for 8039688?
StefanHRT (2021-05-01 03:24:52+00:00): Thank you very much for your feedback. It would be good if you could set the paths all back to either "Private" or "Permit", both would be correct. The one path that was set to no, please also set it back to that. The fact is, you can only get in there with a permit, the control is at the path https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/874079010. 
I've been wanting to ride my bike there more often lately, but they never let me in (not even at 5am). Since there are no current photos, I will take some soon and publish them so that this will not be changed again ;)
gknisely (2021-05-01 18:26:30+00:00): Ok. I reverted all but https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/874079010.  I think if this edge is set to access=private then the routing engines will not allow anyone into or out of the site.  I think this is why the user could not get out.  Can we wait until data is generated to see if it works?
StefanHRT (2021-05-01 18:45:38+00:00): Thank you. As far as I can see, there are still roads without access settlement (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8039689). Just set the one road to customers or permit, then it should work for the one user, but it does not appear in normal routing systems as freely accessible. you write that the user did not come out. The one piece that you want to wait for is the first piece when driving in or the last piece when driving out, so it shouldn't have any meaning here.
gknisely (2021-05-02 00:38:34+00:00): ok should be all set
StefanHRT (2021-05-02 03:00:11+00:00): Thank you. By the way, one more piece of information for you. There is signage everywhere on site regarding the route and how to get to Terminal C (where the vaccination centre is) and back down from the site. In 3 days, the whole area will officially no longer be an airport; according to current information from the press, a large research and business park will be built there in the future.
gknisely (2021-05-02 14:57:35+00:00): Ok.  Thank you for the help and feedback.  Apologies again.
marczoutendijk (2021-04-30 19:21:27+00:00): This should be landuse east of Solana!
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-30 19:11:55+00:00): Sorry, but I this is not according to Lithuanian tagging agreements. Change reverted.
marczoutendijk (2021-04-30 19:21:36+00:00): This should be landuse east of Solana!
rab (2021-04-30 19:06:17+00:00): This is vandalism!
Stop it!
marczoutendijk (2021-04-30 19:21:45+00:00): This should be landuse east of Solana!
habi (2024-11-13 19:38:21+00:00): Ciao Ico Rico
Ich habe gesehen, dass die Praxis hier als ganztags Mo, Di, Mi und Fr offen erfasst wurde.
Das scheint mir nicht zu stimmen.
Kannst du das noch korrigieren?
Gruss,
Habi

PS: Ich bin wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/159104892 hier gelandet.
user_5359 (2021-05-01 05:22:50+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! Short inquiry to the key service_times: the services are held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case add a Su (followed by space character) at the beginning of the value. Please notice also: We use the 24h notation for time informations.
user_3961358 (2021-05-04 12:07:20+00:00): Hi Gunstick,

If you find a new path/track, please map with the lidar (mapper's delight) layer. Unless it's a newly build way after Feb2019 that's not visible on it. GPS is significantly less precise than the lidar imagery.

Happy mapping
Tatfahren (2024-01-27 21:33:04+00:00): Hallo Itsredsect,
du hast damals https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/937397191 als Kuhstall eingetragen. Im Luftbild kann ich aber deutlich erkennen das es sich um einen Hühnerstall handelt. Kannst du das vielleicht nocheinmal prüfen?

Danke, Tatfahren.
skquinn (2021-04-30 20:45:42+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!

In the future, unless the building is demolished, please do not delete the entire building outline (there is still a building at 820 West Loop Street even if you can't go there to watch a movie). I have restored the building outline including address, moving the former cinema name and website to other tags to denote their status.
Stereo (2021-05-03 10:25:16+00:00): Salut, irgendwéi ass erëm eng Adresse op enger Trap gefall.
Kendall County GIS (2021-05-01 03:00:11+00:00): Good additions, but please use MapBox or Esri in this area, Bing is not well-aligned. Or align the imagery to existing features before starting to make edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103932212
b-jazz (2021-05-02 16:13:53+00:00): Hello Sedna, 
I have removed a few of the sidewalks that you mapped in this change since they duplicate an existing path (the cycleway). If there is only one physical path there, there shouldn't be an additional way mapped. The original should be modified or enhanced if need be. There might be some additional cleanup needed in this area. Thanks.
portalaventura (2021-04-30 19:44:02+00:00): DAYANA PINHEIRO DORNELAS, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
habi (2021-05-06 07:41:59+00:00): Ciao Chatelao
Ein Bekannter hat mich darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass die Gardistrasse (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49011269) umbenannt wird.
Warst du evtl. dort vor Ort oder hast du die Strasse ab deiner Liste mit der Wikidata-Referenz versehen?
Gruss,
Habi
habi (2021-05-06 07:42:17+00:00): Sorry, Link zur Medienmitteilung vergessen: https://www.bern.ch/mediencenter/medienmitteilungen/aktuell_ptk/zwei-strassen-im-wankdorf-werden-nach-frauen-benannt
chatelao (2021-05-06 09:41:39+00:00): Ich habe es ab Liste getaggt unter der Annahme, dass die Strassennamen stimmen.
habi (2021-05-06 10:07:52+00:00): Klaro, das hätte ich auch so gemacht.
Ist schon obsolet, jemand hat die Strasse schon umbenannt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104235309
eggie (2021-04-30 20:14:10+00:00): Hi pruvo..

In the Netherlands we tag at the addressnode.
We don't add additional info at the buildingshape.
The institute is already tagged at a node and the BAG addressnode... So there is no need for doubletagging at the building.
Please remove the additional info. 

Removing ACE is of course okay.
Greetz,
eggie
Nate Wessel (2021-04-30 19:49:33+00:00): If this building really is part of the larger embassy then we should probably join it to the others with a relation and specify its particular role if any
Max-Kritic (2021-06-15 14:54:26+00:00): C'est bien d'importer le nouveau cadastre, mais il faut effacer l'ancien.
voir http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=18&lat=50.31668&lon=2.702395&item=xxxx&level=1%2C2%2C3

Osmose indique d'autres erreurs que tu fait.
ChelSeaTheWorld (2021-04-30 20:10:15+00:00): Correction: Comment should have been "Aligned roads around Avenida López Mateos Sur #adt" and source was Esri World Imagery
user_5359 (2021-05-02 04:06:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2021-05-01 04:51:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please add name of the church, religion, denormination (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:religion) to the church.
portalaventura (2021-04-30 20:05:05+00:00): Luan Jovino, boas-vindas ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira contribuição!

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Brasil você encontra informações úteis sobre o projeto de mapeamento colaborativo.

Enquanto você se acostuma com o OpenStreetMap, procure conversar com pessoas mais experientes se tiver dúvidas ou antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que lhe causarem estranheza.

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Em https://wiki.osm.org/Pt:Canais_para_contato estão listadas formas de interagir com a comunidade brasileira. Nacionalmente, no grupo de Telegram https://telegram.me/OSMBrasil_Comunidade você encontrará muitas das pessoas que colaboram com o OSM. Regionalmente, a comunidade de Mato Grosso mantém o grupo https://telegram.me/osmMT.

Boa diversão com suas edições!
GinaroZ (2021-05-19 22:02:43+00:00): Hi, I'm assuming this is a factory and you can't actually buy anything from here? If so the shop tag should be removed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81080794
Tilia_J (2021-05-01 06:58:15+00:00): Begrijp ik correct op basis van je wijzigingenset dat het hele wildraster naar het Oosten verplaatst? Ik zie op de Mapillary foto uit 2019 dat het hek gewoon op de oorspronkelijke plek aanwezig is en behoorlijk nieuw is.

Daarnaast zie ik de verwijderde track geoon op de PDOK foto's,

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.03348972222222&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&lng=5.704099722222223&z=17&pKey=zfCwB-SOBCfdejrN9GQpvw&focus=photo&x=0.4793047812103543&y=0.48342028554858263&zoom=0.3333333333333334