piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_12733236 (2022-08-27 15:04:45+00:00): it won't be rendered as building, rather it will be rendered as a dark green area , since stadium is supposed to include both pitch and related buildings(this arena is covered, so I think it's better to use leisure=stadium) , I would like to think it's quite a safe tag to use.. 
I'm not trying to appear like I know anything, hell, I don't know anything.. just discussing stuff
If you feel like that it should have the building tag, go on and edit it or tell me to do so...
I would ask others as well
Hufkratzer (2022-08-27 15:26:45+00:00): On a map that only shows buildings (regardless of their use) buildings without a building tag will not be shown.
Of course, nobody forces you to map the building(s) in a stadium; but in this case it was already tagged as a (quite large) building before, and you removed the tag, although it was not wrong. I thought that was unintended.
Compare indoor examples on wiki page for sports_centre: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=sports_centre#Indoor. If you can find further evidence that a building tag is unnecessary in this case, please let me know; this is not the first time that I have seen mappers replace building tags with leisure tags.
user_12733236 (2022-08-27 15:33:53+00:00): I see your point and apparently you speak from experience.. I would add the building=yes again.. although I think osm discourages using it,rather specify building type, and for this case since only building=stadium should be used(but it's not multipolygon so no)...so I simply would add back building=yes.. is that ok?
Hufkratzer (2022-08-27 15:42:18+00:00): I don't know this building. You wrote that the area is covered, so maybe building=roof would be more specific? Otherwise, perhaps building=stadium or building=riding_hall? If nothing more specific fits, building=yes.
user_12733236 (2022-08-27 16:12:39+00:00): Sorry for the late reply was busy 
Building=stadium is out of question for this specific case since its not a boundary/multipolygon(no relation), so I guess I go with riding_hallz gimme a few minutes and I'll see
user_12733236 (2022-08-27 16:18:13+00:00): Is it possible I'm missing something?
I have a feeling I'm missing something for some reason
user_12733236 (2022-08-27 16:54:01+00:00): I ruled out building=stadium and building = roof, building=riding_hall is in use tag, and renders as same as building=yes , so gone with this..
Thanks
Hufkratzer (2022-08-27 16:58:50+00:00): It seems the site "Old Spanish Trail Arena" is an area much larger than just this building, see
* https://barrelhorseworld.com/Details/902/Old-Spanish-Trail-Arena
* https://grandcountyutah.net/179/Old-Spanish-Trail-Arena
So the leisure tag (stadium? horse_riding? sports_centre? ...?) would probably go for the whole area and the building tag just for the indoor arena (building) inside that larger area.
user_12733236 (2022-08-27 17:03:04+00:00): Yes, I was looking at street level imagery, there are also separate stables for horses
user_12733236 (2022-08-27 17:04:58+00:00): I'll look into this more throughly, but unfortunately don't have time to do so
Feel free to make adjustments if you feel like it
I made a new change, but unfortunately it's not really correct and I'm apparently using way too many tags
user_12733236 (2022-08-27 17:07:47+00:00): It's definitely an indoor riding hall, and it's more stretched out(its more like rectangular than square), I'll definitely make adjustments, but at a later time
Allison P (2022-09-09 23:54:48+00:00): Names should not be used as descriptions. Please remove "Toilets" as name
RicoElectrico (2022-10-17 11:57:52+00:00): Hej, wydaje mi się, że ta ścieżka nie istnieje: https://postimg.cc/7CxTCb9s
Byłem tam i to jest nie do przejścia, bardzo gęsty zagajnik. Może nie widziałem czegoś?

Jak patrzę na lidar, to jest coś 50 m na zachód, tak jak przebiega granica dzielnic. Ale to też musi być dość ukryta ścieżka.
RicoElectrico (2022-10-17 11:58:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220801683 miał być też ten link :)
lefuturiste (2022-08-24 14:47:09+00:00): Mistake: I also included a change made near Les Douaires where I glued forest and farmland landuse!
bordaben (2022-08-24 18:18:17+00:00): Szia!

Ez még létezik? Google keresés és tavaly tavaszi streetview alapján csak üres rétet látok ott. (Persze ettől függetlenül újraépíthették).

Üdv,
Ben
ssummoner1 (2022-08-25 04:51:17+00:00): Szia!

Dehogy létezik. Josm-ban szerkesztettem főmi orthofoto 2007-2010 alátéttel én meg azt hittem Maxar-on van. Letörlöm mihelyst gép elé kerülök. Köszönöm hogy szóltál!

Üdv: summ
ssummoner1 (2022-08-25 15:01:30+00:00): Törölve. Most már nincs ott semmi.

Üdv: summ
mueschel (2022-09-06 13:50:11+00:00): Please watch out for the correct spelling of keys. It's "motorcar" and "motorcycle", not "motocar" and "motocycle"
umapjpnic793 (2022-08-24 15:15:25+00:00): noticed that I made a mistake on some of this change set :(
umapjpnic793 (2022-08-24 16:00:55+00:00): fixed in 125322443, however, not sure should be reverting
emersonveenstra (2022-08-24 16:05:26+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your contribution, however, trailheads need to be attached to the trail they are for, they can't be a standalone point. Would you mind fixing that?

Also, your description isn't necessary, tagging it as a trailhead means people will know what it is without the description. So can you remove that as well?

Thanks!
CJW33 (2022-08-24 16:09:13+00:00): Hi, this was my first attempt at creating this and I'm a bit lost.  What I'm trying to do is create the trailhead POI for a new trail located on the Whirlpool ghq campus so it shows up on Strava as a POI.
CJW33 (2022-08-24 16:17:03+00:00): I tried just having it as a POI, but it kept on giving me an error and I don't know how to get past it.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-24 16:21:51+00:00): Okay, generally for Strava you need to create the actual trail, not just the trailhead.
Carucci (2022-08-24 16:06:39+00:00): La strada é di costruzione moderna, corredata di pozzetti, scoli per l’acqua, attraversamenti, ed é perfettamente carrabile e NON coltivata. le catene segnalate puntualmente vengono rimosse da forze dell’ordine su segnalazione della cittadinanza locale, stufa ormai di anni di soprusi e minacce perpetrati da tale attività in modo illecito e dalla loro testardaggine e scarsa disponibilità a collaborare.    Tale strada risulta essere uno snodo vitale per il passaggio di mezzi di soccorso in caso di estreme emergenze che impediscano l’accesso al paese di Serra dalla via principale, e funge ormai solo da via tagliafuoco.  La vecchia mulattiera tirata in ballo dai signori e segnata al catasto é ormai franata, non più utilizzabile ne visibile ed  il rudere del mulino é pericolante ed il ponte inagibile, per cui segnalare quel percorso, oltre a non essere affidabile, costituisce un pericolo per i possibili avventori escursionisti, e non è utilizzabile in caso di emergenze. Stiamo comunque lavorando per poterla far tornare fruibile a livello turistico, se ve ne fossero in futuro solidi standard di sicurezza.  La strada da voi reclamata fu voluta dalla comunità montana per gli scopi suddetti e interdire il passaggio segnalando in modo errato “terreno coltivato” é un inesattezza.   Inoltre tale chiusura comporta danni al turismo della zona in quAnto rende inutilizzabile una bellissima strada turistica che rimane aperta a monte. Non abbiamo inoltre prove che risulti dannosa alla vostra attività turistica ne che ci siano stati atti gravi di vandalismo. Abbiamo già provveduto a segnalazioni presso le varie forze dell’ordine e chiediamo agli amministratori di rimediare a tali e fuorvianti indicazioni.  Inoltre chiediamo all’agriturismo o chi per loro ne fa le veci di collaborare, garantendo un minimo passaggio pedonale ed il passaggio di mezzi di soccorso in caso di emergenze.  Sperando in tale collaborazione, condannando vandalismi e fiduciosi che la questione si possa risolvere senza dover arrivare a vie legali (che saranno prese in carico dai comuni di competenza e non dai singoli privati),
porgiamo distinti saluti. 
Comitato Cittadini
Agriturismo La Valle dei Castagni (2022-08-24 16:32:44+00:00): Buonasera Sig. Carucci, noi siamo persone reali con diritti reali. Se volete dialogare potete richiedere un appuntamento. 

Distinti Saluti, 
Azienda Agricola ed Agrituristica La Valle dei Castagni
SekeRob (2022-08-25 15:48:04+00:00): Hi,

What's the source of your name change from Via della Stazione to Via L. Sansovini on 2 sections and then leave Via della Stazione in the middle? For source add the source:name=.... tag.

Notably OSM street names are written in full, so it's Via Luigi Sansovini as tagged on the last part of the way till corner with Primo Maggio.

Ciao,

Qual è l'origine del tuo cambio di nome da Via della Stazione a Via L. Sansovini su 2 sezioni e poi lasciare Via della Stazione nel mezzo? Per la source aggiungi la source:name = .... tag such as survey, local knowledge, sign.

In particolare i nomi delle strade OSM sono scritti per intero, senza abbreviazioni, quindi è Via Luigi Sansovini come etichettata nell'ultima parte della strada fino all'angolo con Primo Maggio.
user_16544420 (2022-08-25 16:26:09+00:00): ciao, però via L. Sansovini inizia di fronte alla stazione ferroviaria, quindi andrebbe corretto anche il tratto dove è "via della stazione", in pratica via L. Sansovini inizia poco dopo la Salita Pacchiarotti fino all'incrocio con via primo maggio
SekeRob (2022-08-26 07:53:05+00:00): OK, in realtà è nel punto in cui si trova il vialetto recintato, vicino all'ingresso del parcheggio. Ho corretto la situazione.

Saluti

PS e L. é Luigi, no abbreviazione quando e ritrovabile. Il consumatore di dati cartografici è responsabile dell'abbreviazione, l'inverso non è possibile. ;O)
user_15552334 (2022-08-25 15:55:48+00:00): Hello fam, so your name Arwh and welcomd to OpenStreetMap!

My boys noticed that some of your damn small changes span the entire globe and it so flipping annoying - it helps to make them more localised in your smelly area so that people can look them up in the 'History' tab. In this case, I could bloody see these changes in history for small towns in the amazing United Kingdom which I assume was not your intention right fam?

Also, BLOODY do use meaningful changeset comments - “/” does not help other meme lords understand what you are flipping doing. You can find guidance on good changeset comments in the OSM wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Fam next time let me know if you need further help with any of that of bruv?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
iWowik (2022-10-07 04:38:02+00:00): Прекратите, пожалуйста ломать данные.
Вы меняете тип населенного пункта на точке, но не меняете на границе.
Поправте, пожалуйста, сами.
Вы больно много такого нагородили.
TrickyFoxy (2022-10-07 07:46:30+00:00): Мой косяк в инструкции рулетки. Пройдусь и поправлю
iWowik (2022-10-07 07:57:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1612658876
population=4
Тут любой маппер скажет, что это не locality и вернет hamlet
TrickyFoxy (2022-10-07 08:22:04+00:00): population:date=2008

любой маппер скажет, что данные старые
iWowik (2022-10-07 11:53:59+00:00): Да, но других-то и нет, да далеко не каждый смотреть-то на дату станет.
TrickyFoxy (2022-10-07 12:01:41+00:00): Ну тогда получается population не нужен и его можно снести:) wiki(data|pedia) наше всё
iWowik (2022-10-10 06:31:40+00:00): Ага, и name тоже?
Уж лучше таки обновить данные
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
RicoElectrico (2022-08-24 20:40:16+00:00): Cześć, czy na pewno ta Biedronka jest zamknięta w soboty? Trochę to dziwne.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
sazrodrigo (2022-08-24 19:44:59+00:00): A forma deve manter a etiqueta "edifício".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125322401
Kairo Amorim (2022-08-24 19:51:19+00:00): ok
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125322401
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Bobropiton (2022-08-25 22:41:00+00:00): http://xc.gati-online.ru/allinfo.php?key=436938
Ордер ГАТИ по перекрытию дорог и отводу транспорта действует по 30.08. Зачем вы вносили изменения?
SomeoneElse (2022-08-24 16:24:00+00:00): Hello again Angelica D,

Please do use better changeset descriptions than just "#hotosm-project-12825 #OSMBD #Bangladesh #BangladeshFloodResponse2022 ".  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for more information.

Best Regards,
Andy
silversurfer83 (2022-08-25 04:51:39+00:00): Hallo und Herzlich Willkommen bei OSM :)

Ich möchte Deine ersten Änderungen nutzen und Dich begrüßen und Dir ein paar Hinweise hinterlassen:
Wenn du Daten eingibst findest du rechts vom Datenfeld ein kleines "i", welches Dich zum passenden Eintrag im Wiki führt und Dich darüber informiert, worum es bei diesem Datenpunkt geht und wie es gemeint ist.
Grundsätzlich sind folgende Seiten für Einsteiger sehr hilfreich:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

Außerdem findest Du hier jede Menge aktive Chatgruppen, in denen du eigentlich immer Unterstützung bei Fragen findest
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers

Eine Anmerkung zu dieser Änderung hätte ich auch noch:
Handelt es sich hier um einen einzelnen Tisch mit Bank (wäre dann leisure=picnic_table) oder wirklich um mehrere oder auch ein Schutzdach und vielleicht eine Feuerstelle dabei (dann, so wie du eingetragen hast, leisure=picnic_site)?

Weiter viel Spaß beim Erfassen des Wittgensteiner Landes
-silversurfer83
Dirk_Hom (2022-08-25 06:12:41+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,

vielen Dank für Deine guten Hinweise, werde mir die Punkte anschauen und ggf. nochmals eine Korrektur durchführen.

Gruß pischa
Aleksa M (2022-08-24 18:49:12+00:00): Mislim da bi trebalo da se vrati building=train_station jer je praksa da se building odnosi na to šta je njena izvorna namena, kao što kaže na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:use Nova namena se označava sa building:use.
zuri8 (2022-08-24 20:08:06+00:00): Nisam se u udubljivao u temu nego onako u zaletu počistio. Ako si pri kompu ispravi, ja ne mogu sa telefona.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125323782
Aleksa M (2022-08-24 20:20:32+00:00): Važi, ispraviću, samo čisto obaveštavam.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-28 05:01:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9975290963 - I would say that just wikimedia_commons link is fine! No need to add image tag
amadvance (2022-08-28 20:02:51+00:00): Hi Mateusz,

Unfortunately, there are sites/visualizers that support only the image tag. The most prominent example is waymarkedtrails.org. I even tried to convince them to support wikimedia_commons but without result: https://github.com/waymarkedtrails/waymarked-trails-site/issues/359

So, adding them both seems the best option.

Ciao,
Andrea
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-29 04:48:13+00:00): BTW, https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/restrict-wikimedia-commons-urls-as-image-tag-values/2271 is related discussion (though I commented here for a different reason)

(you can post on that new official forum using OSM account)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Jakka (2022-08-25 07:57:59+00:00): place_of_worship te gebruiken als er regelmatig erediensten plaats vinden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship building=chapel
RVB38 (2022-08-28 10:13:44+00:00): Aangepast
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-24 17:15:06+00:00): Hi,

highway=unclassified is not the correct road type, since it is not considered part of the public road network. Please change it back to highway=service, thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125324802
EZRouting (2022-08-24 17:18:16+00:00): Thanks, I will change this one to a service road.
Hufkratzer (2022-08-27 14:34:42+00:00): Hi, I think leisure=track + sport=horse_racing is inappropriate for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088856632. This is a jumping arena, it should better be tagged as leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena. The obstacles / fences in this jumping arena are not permanent and should therefore better not be mapped, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier=horse_jump.
topolusitania (2022-08-28 22:15:02+00:00): Thanks. Corrected
TL
Hufkratzer (2022-08-30 11:11:41+00:00): Thanks, I also corrected these old ones: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125563663
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 16:17:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128217853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
b-unicycling (2022-08-24 23:13:55+00:00): If you mean the green line, very possibly; I've only cycled down the lane, as you can see on mapillary.
mueschel (2022-08-27 08:59:53+00:00): Hi,
what is "the digital property map "? Is this available with a license compatible with OSM? I find it hard to believe that the L417 road runs on private property...
RubenKelevra (2022-08-27 14:20:30+00:00): Source is provided: ALKIS.

License for this source is always CC-0 in NRW.
user_5359 (2022-08-28 10:59:11+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.osm.org/way/1088863587. What is the meaning of the unknown tags
aktualit = 2022-02-07Z
art = Gemarkungsteil/Flur
gemeinde = Remscheid
gmdschl = 05120000
name = 063
oid = DE053264063
schluessel = 053264063
uebobjekt = DE053264
ueboname = Lüttringhausen
?
RubenKelevra (2022-08-28 11:29:47+00:00): Usually I don't keep those tags, but in this case it kinda made sense to me to keep them for future reference to the ALKIS.

If you don't think so, feel free to drop them.
user_5359 (2022-08-28 11:33:56+00:00): Hello! Please have look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Grenze_zeichnen. We use other keys to store this type of informations.
RubenKelevra (2022-08-28 11:36:01+00:00): As I said, feel free to fix that 🤷‍♂️
RubenKelevra (2022-08-28 11:37:44+00:00): This is *not* an administrative boundary. So nothing in the article you linked applies here.
wolfshafen (2024-10-01 12:25:48+00:00): Ich bin der Meinung, dass der Seewald-Parkplatz direkt neben der B30 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36976809) aus OSM entfernt werden sollte, da er nicht ausgeschildert und nur ordnungswidrig erreichbar ist: Sowohl die Seitenlinie der B30 als auch Linien auf beiden Seiten des Geh- und Radwegs sind durchgezogen, ein Abbiegen an dieser Stelle ist somit verboten.
wolfshafen (2024-10-01 12:29:46+00:00): Einen offiziellen Parkplatz gibt es am Ende der Straße "Am Seewald" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372622245).
errezz (2024-10-01 13:14:49+00:00): Da müsste ich nochmal vorbei gehen. Ist der sicher nur "wild"? Am Kreisverkehr ist auf jeden Fall ein inoffizieller Teil.
wolfshafen (2024-10-01 13:37:25+00:00): Möglicherweise ist das Parken hier geduldet, erlaubt ist es jedoch keinesfalls (siehe oben). Die Situation ist auch in Google StreetView ersichtlich:
https://www.google.de/maps/@47.6653935,9.5128262,3a,58.3y,149.74h,83.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQOiL-Rtek2MwRoO2kUj3vw!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?coh=205409&entry=ttu&g_ep=EgoyMDI0MDkyNS4wIKXMDSoASAFQAw%3D%3D
errezz (2024-10-01 14:13:46+00:00): Nach den Regeln dürfte gegenüber und in Richtung FN nicht zum ESV abgebogen werden. (Das Stadtwerk hätte am Umspannwerk auch ein Problem) Außerdem wird hier das Fuß-/Radweg Schild wiederholt, was auf einer "hier darf eh nicht durch gefahren werden" Strecke nicht nötig wäre. 

Daher würde ich nach der Beschilderung nebendran https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11055321505 oder https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1338583253 gehen. Die kenne ich nur leider nicht auswendig.
seewäldler (2024-10-02 14:12:34+00:00): Am hinteren Ende des Parkplatzes Richtung Wald ist auf dem Streetview Bild ein Verkehrszeichen 260 und eine Schranke zu sehen. Das deute ich so, dass bis dahin Autos fahren dürfen, also auch ein Parkplatz angefahren werden kann.  Die Seitenlinien des Fuss- und Radweges sind vor nicht allzulanger Zeit neu gemacht worden, hier würde ich eher vermuten, dass versäumt wurde das hier zu überfahrende Stück auf der gesamten Strecke durch den Wald beim Markieren auszulassen. 

Den Parkplatz in über 1 km Entfernung Am Seewald, der nur durch das Wohngebiet zu erreichen ist und oft schon zu klein ist als ausschiessliche Alternative zu sehen finde ich hier nicht passend.
Allison P (2022-08-26 17:03:33+00:00): The zip code is 83642, not 83716. The address was already in the database, just not the business info. It is better to add the info to the point that already exists. This time I fixed it for you. Thank you for the addition.