piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-10-06 11:01:31+00:00): Okey.. I see..
It's changed a few days ago https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529761756#map=18/51.83429/4.64948
I's an old (wrong)  tag indeed.
It was mapped wrong here with a combination with seperate leisure=parks combined with landuse=grass on the same way.
So I changed the whole park with one leisure park on top of the seperate parts with  landuse grass and natural=water. 
The  rendering is okey.
I use JOSM and it's hard to make wrong tags with that editor. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529761756#map=18/51.83429/4.64948
eggie (2017-10-06 11:02:17+00:00): ... Thanks anyway !!  :)
eggie (2017-10-06 11:04:19+00:00): This was my edit 2017-10-03
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52605142
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 11:09:18+00:00): Hmm, sorry, but the relation itself is still defect and has `landusesss` tagged! 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7625201
eggie (2017-10-06 11:11:29+00:00): No problem.. Strange wil have a look again
eggie (2017-10-06 11:34:14+00:00): I emptied all the relations and started over again. Added landuse and water. Validator JOSM say it's okay.
All the tags comes from presets JOSM. landuse=grass
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 11:41:41+00:00): No, the relation is still there, still untouched, still no members. Please download the relation manually (CTRL+SHIFT+o) to JOSM
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7625201 r7625201
eggie (2017-10-06 11:57:20+00:00): Strange.. if I load this in osm.org I see the town of Bavel near Breda. 

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7625201#map=16/51.5667/4.8313

I try to figure it out.
eggie (2017-10-06 12:06:42+00:00): Hi.. I removed the empty relation..  Let''s see :) Thanks
eggie (2017-10-06 12:35:17+00:00): It's still an empty relation but I'm not able to sove the problem?? Why is the faulth still present. I can't find that relation but the validator in JOSM find evry time the empty relelation 7625201 ??
eggie (2017-10-06 12:38:42+00:00): After restart JOSM and afterwards the validator I think the problem has solved.
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 12:40:44+00:00): Indeed. You have remove all the members, childs, tags ... but not the relation itself.
I will delete it.
eggie (2017-10-06 12:50:11+00:00): Okay.. thanks.
Glassman (2017-10-03 22:48:25+00:00): I went ahead and changed the street to 120th Court Southeast. In OSM we use the full spelling since software has a hard time UN-abbreviating words.
Rainero (2017-10-08 13:25:15+00:00): Hallo Hans,
sollte die PLZ hier nicht 86316 sein? M.W. hat ganz Friedberg 86316.

Grüße,
Rainer
Hans Gollmann (2017-10-08 13:37:30+00:00): Du hast Recht, habe mich vertan, sorry
Hans
Mariaaaaa (2017-10-05 20:05:59+00:00): Hello could you please add #msftidentity to the changeset hashtags. Thanks.
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 09:32:06+00:00): Hello Arlo James Barnes. You have introduced the new and so far unkown key
`timepoint` instead of perhaps
`timetable`, right?
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/timetable#combinations
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 09:42:45+00:00): And what is `route_direction=o` for?
Arlo James Barnes (2017-10-07 08:56:05+00:00): Hi, you hit upon my main reason I wanted my edit to be reviewed. I was trying to match the data published by the city of Santa Fe (https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?mid=1pQGo8Vr7L6EFIK5uqPhm9MWSEog) and the actual stop location and amenities verified with ground truth, but was not sure of the current status of tags; I thought a more experienced OSMer might know :)

The route direction was a typo, it should say "outbound". I will fix it when at a better computer tomorrow.
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-07 09:12:12+00:00): Sorry, i'm not a specialist in Public Transport. I've only pointed out the new tags (bus_routes, route_direction, stop_id, timepoint).
First of all you have to read
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport
Then you should be sure to have the data checked on-site and haven't copied any data from other sources, because OSM has a very strict (open) license which is often incompatible to other licenses!
Hjart (2017-10-03 20:05:47+00:00): Det ser ud til at det ikke er oversat korrekt i iD. På engelsk hedder det "cattle_grid" og jeg har iøvrigt rettet det.
Constable (2017-10-04 09:52:06+00:00): Hi there Buzzo, please consider using proper changeset comments, "Revision n.* " don't help other mappers understanding your edits. Here you can find more info about the changeset comments that we as mappers are supposed to use.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Thanks for your help
Cheers
Supaplex (2018-01-20 00:12:01+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-10-04 07:55:45+00:00): Ciao,
secondary in OSM è una strada di rango molto elevato, probabilmente sarà una highway=unclassified o addirittura una residential (vedi qui http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Map_Features#Highway_.28strade_e_vie.29). Ho fatto qualche piccola modifica, ma se sei del luogo verifica tu.
Grazie
  Alessandro
eggie (2017-10-04 06:43:52+00:00): Tip: Volgens mij had commodoortje dat al gezegd. Je kunt ook apart aangeven waar de ingang van het gebouw is met entrance=yes
voorrangsweg (2017-10-04 19:53:51+00:00): Ik zie dat Exportstraat nummer 41 nu twee keer voorkomt, welke van de twee zou weg kunnen?
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 09:41:22+00:00): Hello mdelatorre. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425224332
you have tagged
`Vega del Heno`.
What is it for? Please keep in mind: keys should be in english ;-)
mueschel (2017-10-07 11:15:36+00:00): That's a copy and paste error of the name. Fixed it according to source of this changeset.
mdelatorre (2017-10-12 05:07:48+00:00): My mistake. It was a residential street as you have already fixed. :-)
user_1213011 (2017-10-03 20:13:40+00:00): Sorry - autofill error on the changeset description. Should have read:
Sutherlin, Oregon - Add tags: Stephens Community Historic District
S-zation (2017-10-03 20:27:23+00:00): Hey tws45, looks like you accidentally removed the place=town tag for Princeton, New Jersey.  Without the tag, the "Princeton" label disappears from the map.  I went ahead and fixed it for you.  Please be more careful in the future if you need to edit place tags!
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 09:07:47+00:00): Hello Werewombat. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/523933181
you have tagged
`heritate` instead of
`heritage`, right? #typo
I'm not an expert in heritage, so i hope the other tag combinations are okay.
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 09:09:01+00:00): And at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/524527786
`heritage_operator` instead of
`heritage:operator`, right? #typo

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=heritage
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 09:45:22+00:00): Hello 30303020. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514834619
and arround you have tagged
`railway.etcs` instead of 
`railway:etcs`, right? #typo
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 09:47:03+00:00): arround = all the rails in the station at Fürstenwalde (Spree)
30303020 (2017-10-06 23:35:18+00:00): Thanks. I fixed it.
schoka (2017-10-06 19:45:01+00:00): Bist du sicher, dass Du  hier ein zweites Windrad als "Monument" einzeichnen wolltest?
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 10:16:00+00:00): Hello QuercE. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115917796
you have tagged
`disused:religiion` instead of
`disused:religion`, right? #typo
VincentVE (2017-10-06 10:39:22+00:00): indeed, I've fixed it
eggie (2017-10-04 06:46:34+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
eggie (2017-10-04 06:50:24+00:00): info combined with address node
smaprs (2017-10-04 01:28:47+00:00): Olá Gaspar, os nomes no OSM devem ser escritos diferenciando maiúsculas de minúsculas,  tipo São Jorge. Sem adicionar a cidade com hífen, pois já está contido nesta
Cascafico (2017-10-04 07:25:20+00:00): Ok, grazie.
tyr_asd (2017-10-07 06:59:13+00:00): Hi. Danke für das Eintragen des Parkplatzes. Was hat diese Änderung aber damit zu tun, dass irgendwo eine Bank eine Rückenlehne hat (wie du im Kommentar zu dieser Änderung angegeben hast)? ;-)
eggie (2017-10-04 06:03:04+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-10-04 06:09:09+00:00): We zetten in nederland geen adressen op gebouwen zelf. Die staan al op de adresnodes. De Regenboogboogkerk en het zalencentrum heb je van vorm veranderd. Die komen echter uit de data van het kadaster. Hebben ze een andere vorm gekregen of is dat per abuis gebeurd. Haal je zelf weer de adresgegevens van de gebouwen. Dit was je edit. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52608902
eggie (2017-10-04 06:30:37+00:00): Door zelf een gebouw van de kaart te halen en het op nieuw te tekenen gaat de historie verloren en zijn de kadastergegevens ook verdwenen. 
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je een terugmelding doen bij de BAG.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=endeldijk%207&resultOffset=0&objectId=1783100000042653&geometry.x=75529.922400512&geometry.y=447403.5015982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=
Graag reactie
eggie (2017-10-04 06:33:06+00:00): Ja.. in het begin moet je het allemaal maar weten?  :)
De regenboogkerk heeft nu ..en zijn gegevens op de node ..en dezelfde gegevens op het gebouw. daardoor zie je het kerksymbool 2x. Het is dus zaak een keuze te maken. Doe je dit zelf?
eggie (2017-10-04 06:35:40+00:00): De functie  "zalencentrum" hoort denk ik niet op het gebouw zelf.
Het lijkt misschien op gezeur..maar we proberen de beste kaart te maken met elkaar. beginnersfouten worden je niet kwalijk genomen.
dcapillae_old (2017-10-03 21:51:43+00:00): Hola, Tolo530.

Por favor, ten cuidado al añadir datos al mapa de no borrar los datos previos existentes. He vuelto a redibujar los edificios eliminados que hay en este lugar. Gracias por añadir el restaurante.

Si necesitas información sobre cómo empezar a mapear en OSM, puedes consultar el wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Gracias de nuevo.
Feliz mapeo.

Cordialmente,
Daniel
cadsauxk (2017-11-29 20:40:34+00:00): Lucas esse trecho da BA-275 é de terra, eu sei porque passei lá, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325549080

não pode ser secondary em hipótese alguma
cadsauxk (2017-11-29 20:43:26+00:00): Um amigo meu capotou o carro neste trecho porque não sabia que a rodovia virava terra logo depois da rotatória (sério!!).

Então pro favor, volte a rodovia para o que ela estava antes.
naoliv (2017-12-02 20:05:16+00:00): Lucas, a comunidade só avança se tiver diálogo e entendimento entre os participantes (incluindo seguir algumas convenções já discutidas e estabelecidas).
Mudar algo unilateralmente geralmente não ajuda.
Se algo não lhe parece correto, o caminho é discutir com a comunidade para se chegar numa solução melhor.
Por favor, não ignore as mensagens de outros mapeadores. Também não faça mudanças que vão contra as definições já aceitas.
Tente discutir na comunidade caso algo não lhe pareça correto.
eggie (2017-10-04 06:11:11+00:00): Dit is wel een erg groot gebied voor een chnageset met je edits. Probeer in een heel klein gebied iets te mappen en sla het vervolgens op. Ga dan pas naar het andere gebied.
eggie (2017-10-04 06:17:32+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk... en OSM wel in het bijzonder..
Wanneer je zelf adressen aanmaakt komen ze 2x voor in de database. De kadaster adresnode staat er immers ook. Die zou je moeten gebruiken. Verder heb je een gebouw van de kaart gehaals en op die plaatst een nieuw getekend. In Nederland tekenen we binnen OSM geen gebouwen maar importeren we uit het kadaster (BAG)
Je doen dan een verzoek op het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import en hebt in no time je gebouw.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Doe je het zelf? Graag reactie.
Zet dan de link van openstreetmap.org erbij.
mavl (2017-10-07 06:55:05+00:00): Здравствуйте. Строго говоря, в Тюменской области нет деревни Ершовка. Полный список населённых пунктов приведён в законе Тюменской области № 263 и он не содержит ни одной Ершовки. Возможно, Ершовка - это коттеджный посёлок или что-то подобное.
MaksimTo (2017-10-07 07:14:11+00:00): Здравствуйте. Может быть.
MaksimTo (2017-10-07 09:16:14+00:00): Не подскажете, как лучше, добавлять точку POI или заметку osm? А то я смотрю заметки не удаляются
mavl (2017-10-07 09:31:28+00:00): Заметки созданы для того, чтобы любой человек (даже не знакомый с редактированием в OSM) мог оставить сообщение об ошибке на карте. Подробнее [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Notes]. Созданная заметка будет отображаться на карте пока кто-нибудь не исправить ошибку и не переведёт заметку в состояние "Закрыто". В состоянии "Закрыто" заметка ещё поотображается на карте 7 дней и исчезнет с карты.  
  
Если же вы точно знаете, что какой-то объект существует, то добавляйте его сразу в OSM без заметок. Но если у вас нет времени, то вы, конечно, можете добавить заметку и ждать, пока объект добавит кто-то другой.
MaksimTo (2017-10-07 09:33:46+00:00): Спасибо. Я просто добавляю пока что, потом либо сам либо кто-нибудь раньше меня может исправит.
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 09:38:01+00:00): Hello jzarate53. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5146127969
you have tagged
`Taller de Costura`. What is it for?
Should it be a craft=tailor?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft
Jørn-osm (2017-10-03 22:24:20+00:00): Vejnavne m.m. skulle kommentaren være.
Noen (2020-07-01 17:14:28+00:00): Hei igjen! Siden det finnes en enighet om at historiske ting ikke helt hører hjemme i OSM, har OpenStreetMap fått et søsterprosjekt: Open Historical Map (OHM). Kunne jeg kopiere over arbeidet ditt med Eidsfossbanen dit? I OHM må man spesifisere en lisens på arbeidet. Siden Kartverkets historiske kart er brukt så er det kanskje NLOD?
NKA (2020-07-01 17:46:27+00:00): Om du mener at dette skal slettes i OSM så vil jeg motsette meg det. Det er nok konsensus om hovedregelen (at ting som ikke finnes lenger ikke skal være i OSM), men det er mange års praksis for at nedlagte jernbaner like vel legges inn i OSM. Det er i hvert fall ikke konsensus om å fjerne dem. Det meste av slike baner lever uansett videre som veier, stier, broer osv og det er som regel bare korte strekninger som ikke kan sees lenger (og selv da kan man ofte se avtrykket i terrenget).

Jeg håper virkelig ikke du fjerner nedlagte jernbaner. Det vil mange her se på som vandalisering av deres arbeid.
Noen (2020-07-01 21:37:55+00:00): Neida, ikke slette noe, bare kopiere. Skulle vært enda klarere på at jeg ikke foreslår å slette noe.
Rester etter jernbaner slik som bruer, fyllinger, skjæringer, og tunneler, og sykkelstier og veier som har erstattet en jernbane skal være med i OSM, og det er en fordel at det kan tagges at disse har vært jernbaner.
Diskusjonen på e-postlista har gått på om de delene av en nedlagt jernbane som ikke er synlig i terrenget lenger skal få være med.
Det er ikke en diskusjon det er særlig produktiv å ta opp igjen.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-July/008559.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2015-August/073665.html

Tanken var kun at Eidsfossbanen lever tryggere hvis den ligger i OHM i tillegg. I tillegg vises den frem på OHM kartet.
NKA (2020-07-02 06:00:04+00:00): Bra, ble et øyeblikk bekymret :)

Jeg oppfatter at det fremdeles er strid om dette temaet for jernbaner og at det ikke er konsensus. For min del fortsetter jeg å mappe railway=razed der andre egenskaper mangler.

Disse dataene kan du nok kopiere som du vil slik ODbL gir anledning til. NLOD er nok ok. Vi har bare tillatelser for OSM, men antar at OHM regnes som en del av OSM.
stephankn (2017-10-06 20:24:41+00:00): way 529811317
way 529811311
way 529811338

and others in that area are clearly residential roads in a newly constructed residential area. Should be tagged as such, not service.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:35:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
highflyer74 (2017-10-04 06:25:56+00:00): Moin! Kannst Du hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5146205533 einmal nachsehen? Da ist ein "#" zuviel, aber irgendwie passt auch der Wert nicht zu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type.

Gruss aus HB!
Spongilla (2017-10-04 06:54:54+00:00): Moin highflyer74,
vielen Dank für Deine Anmerkung. Was ich dort kartiert habe ist ein kleiner überdachter Unterstand (Fläche 2 x 3 m) zur Vogelbeobachtung. Abgeleitet habe ich den Wert von Vogel-Beobachtungstürmen, die ja als man_Made:tower mit tower_type: oberservation  und tourism: viewpoint kartiert werden. Die Hütte ist aber eindeutig kein Turm. So dass ich es so für die logischste Benennung hielt. Basiskartierung Shelter was ja zutrifft.
Hättest Du dafür eine andere Idee?

Viele Grüße aus BS
highflyer74 (2017-10-04 08:27:08+00:00): Vielen Dank für Deine Rückmeldung. Das macht die Sache klarer :-) In dem Fall fällt mir auch nichts besseres ein, als https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dwildlife_hide. Ich habe mal Taginfo befragt und der meldet folgendes: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=wildlife*#values

Schönen Tag Dir!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-06 09:29:35+00:00): Hello padvinder. At
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/529816200
you have tagged
`TRACKTYP` instead of
`tracktype`, right?
Do you remember the surface?
padvinder (2017-10-25 13:13:32+00:00): thanks. changed things.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
AlaskaDave (2018-10-12 10:27:33+00:00): Hi,
You have tagged a feature (id=529818369) using 1493 nodes as natural=water but much of it it appears to be wetland. The DigitalGlobe-Premium imagery you used clearly shows this. I'm confused.
avalancha (2017-10-05 13:38:21+00:00): Hi, I can't see the whole "Glen Ora Housing Site", the nice curvy bumps of the Haddington road west of the law, or any of the buildings that are supposed to be in the very southwest of North Berwick according to this on Google Maps, Bing Maps, Bing or Google Sat, Streetview or any other service. Is this planned? Or done by local knowledge?
GinaroZ (2017-10-05 13:52:14+00:00): Hi, my edit in that area was to fix a typo - see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=52611098 for my edits.
It seems the changes were made in this changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40949676 in case you want to contact the mapper.
If you google the site name you can find out more about the development, including a site plan, and recent photos of the area: http://www.geograph.org.uk/search.php?i=77625275
avalancha (2017-10-05 13:56:01+00:00): oh man, sorry about that, total newbie here, thanks for your guidance!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-10-21 12:36:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53127025 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/business-industry/heavy-vehicles/maps/restricted-access-vehicles-map/map/
JJIglesias (2017-10-04 15:23:56+00:00): Saludos y gracias por la Edicion. Queria saber que es lo q estaba mal colocado exactamente. Pues OSM Inspector marco esta edicion como sospechosa. Gracias JJIglesias
aharvey (2017-10-05 13:30:33+00:00): This node somehow got caught up with the road. Instead of deleting the tags I've restored it's position and detached it from the way in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52654782

If you've surved that there is no library then that's fine, but I guess you're just deleting it since it was incorrectly attached to the road.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/4370846255
Wilson Yung (2017-10-05 21:50:14+00:00): I saw two byron bay library, one at -28.642389, 153.610847(the one I deleted)
,the other at -28.643286, 153.615522( which is the real byron bay library location)
aharvey (2017-10-05 22:52:42+00:00): Got it, I was confused as the changeset comment was "hotel name change".

It would be awesome if you mentioned this in the changeset comment, something like "removing duplicate library already existing at http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4621800012". Thanks!
Wilson Yung (2017-10-05 22:58:23+00:00): I will make sure changes are reflected in the summary....especially when I move from one location to the other...