piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rom1 (2021-05-24 20:31:17+00:00): Bonjour, s'agit-il d'un parking identifié comme tel ou juste d'un endroit où il est possible de stationner un véhicule ? Aussi, ce serait possible de préciser quels sont les objets représentés par tourism=information https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8761126943, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8761195663 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8761181076 ? Merci !
Gwenvador (2021-05-28 16:51:38+00:00): Corrections effectuées. Ce parking est pour les ruines des tranchées allemandes qui n'étaient pas mappées.
eggie (2021-05-25 09:36:29+00:00): Dag Germo Je vraagt om feedback. Volgens de BGT is het nu correct.
MVG
eggie
Jakka (2021-05-25 09:34:32+00:00): Je vais essayer de modifier un peut. Pas évidant circuit fermé ...
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105227811
dval (2021-05-24 14:17:48+00:00): Здравствуйте, Energizer1986! В устье Тыпыла вы нарисовали поверхность воды. Но как-то очень хитро, то есть так, что линий совпадают, чтобы выделить остров. Есть более продвинутый способ рисования островов - и вообще всех сложных поверхностей - через мультиполигоны. Хотя вроде бы и так ничто не ругается, но всё-таки OSMCha говорит, что есть какие-то две близко расположенные точки. Также нарисованная вами поверхность воды имеет два пересечения с дорогой через реку. И следовательно, между точками пересечение надо бы указывать, что здесь брод по линии дороги. Я поправил и первое, и второе.
manoj@123 (2021-05-24 13:02:56+00:00): Here, I used Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta).
Tesla (2021-05-25 08:57:23+00:00): Ну и зачем удалили пруд возле метеостанции? Нравится портить всё к чему прикасаетесь?
MarcoR (2021-05-24 20:20:58+00:00): Ciao! Quello che hai convertito in un sentiero dovrebbe in realtà essere un piccolo rigagnolo; sei sicuro che il sentiero "Piloni" non sia quello già mappato più a Est (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/242016194) ? Inoltre i nomi dei sentieri vanno scritti con solo la prima lettera maiuscola (vedi le regole della comunità italiana qua: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade) e se il nome è usato solo dai "mountain-bikers" alcuni utenti preferiscono usare mtb:name al posto di name. Buon mapping!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105228656
southglos (2021-05-24 14:38:29+00:00): Hi.  This changeset moved one corner of Mill Farm several fields away - assume this was accidental; I've put it back where it was.

Cheers, Paul.
Jrachi (2021-05-26 09:01:18+00:00): Ciao.
Sto inserendo i percorsi del catasto sentieri e vedo che hai inserito il 309A.
Vedo due problemi:
1) Non esiste nel catasto. È un proposed?
2) Parte da un bivio con 304 e passa lontano dal 309 ufficiale.
Domanda: sui guidepost sono presenti indicazioni con "309A"?

Ivo
cartomatto (2021-05-27 18:53:30+00:00): Mi sono fidato dei nomi che sono assegnati ai vari segmenti di sentiero, creando la relation in base a quelli.
Onestamente non ricordo se è indicato sui segnavia, mi pare di si.
cartomatto (2021-05-30 14:23:38+00:00): confermo che all'estremità ovest della relation, sulla testa del palo segnaletico c'è scritto 309A/3, anche se sulle frecce non è indicato un numero.
Jrachi (2021-05-30 15:12:20+00:00): Ti ringrazio.
Si tratta di una variante non a catasto.
Ivo
ElliottPlack (2021-09-10 02:39:26+00:00): Good edit here. Noticed and was going to add this
Tesla (2021-05-25 09:02:03+00:00): way 782709828 это именно просека, а не дорога. Прекратите слепо редактировать по спутнику. Берите ноги в руки и идите лично провеяйте. Задолбал портить всё!
southglos (2021-05-24 14:35:57+00:00): Hi.  This changeset moved the telephone box bookcase some distance - I assume that was accidental, and have put it back where it was.

Cheers, Paul.
ndm (2021-05-24 22:11:21+00:00): "access=no" means no one can legally access this service road -- which seems odd. Maybe "service=private" was intended?
Jakka (2021-05-24 20:31:40+00:00): is gans dit gebied/oppervlakte een overkapping gebouw https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946467846 Graag retour antwoord
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105230472
Leumas-69 (2021-05-24 22:41:54+00:00): Neen, op alle lange perrons op deze lijn staat een standaard tramhokje/shelter. Vooral de perrons werden langer gemaakt en zijn verhoogd aangepast toen de nieuwe trammodellen in gebruik zijn genomen. In bochten zoals aan ferrerlaan heeft de tram geen mogelijkheid meer om er te stoppen door de lengte doordat er gevaarlijke situaties ontstaan waar de chauffeurs geen zicht op hebben. halte guislainstraat richting evergem/wondelgem stond ook op een fout punt aangeduid.
Jakka (2021-05-25 08:41:03+00:00): Prima heb deze aangepast met je info.
Een hokje erop gezet mogelijk niet 100% op juiste locatie. Kan altijd wat verschoven worden ;)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105230472
ndm (2021-05-24 22:09:00+00:00): It seems odd to have a cycleway with "bicycle=no" did you survey this?
ndm (2021-05-24 22:07:24+00:00): I've corrected a long node drag from this changeset -- seems like it might not be the only one.
user_5359 (2021-05-25 18:32:50+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.

etat revetement=bon
nama=rue Ibn Younes (name ??)
nama fr=rue Ibn Younes (name:fr ??)
name arabe=نهج ابن يونس (name:ar ??
revetement=enrobé (surface ??)
BCNorwich (2021-05-24 15:27:25+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Can you explain what it is you're trying to do please? Most of the objects/features you added in this and previous changesets are already mapped to OSM. If an object needs correcting or amending it's OSM practice to make changes to the original object.

Regards Bernard.
STAHS Prep Mapping Project (2021-05-24 16:20:55+00:00): Hi Bernard
Thank you. We realised some of the buildings were already mapped and I didn't want pupils  to amend the business details.

We are working on a project with Microsoft, the intention is to build a MS Soundscape route around the village where our school is and each point marks an information plaque for a historic building or place. As a starting point we are mapping the plaques and in a couple of weeks time we will be building the data set on the Soundscape app.
Please let me know if there is anything that needs amending as this is how we have been advised to proceed.

Kind regards

Neil
BCNorwich (2021-05-24 18:06:15+00:00): Hello Neil,

Please be advised that OSM is a live worldwide database from which lots  of maps are compiled. As such the data you've added will now be downloaded by map makers. Thus the data should if possible conform to current OSM best practice, and not include duplicated data. Please see:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

You could map your project using OSM saving it offline without uploading it. 

The mapping of plaques is outlined here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:memorial%3Dplaque and gives some good information. There's a site called Open Plaques here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Plaques  which looks like it links to OSM data.

Regards Bernard.
STAHS Prep Mapping Project (2021-05-25 06:32:30+00:00): Hi Bernard

Thank you for your reply and the links, I will have a look as we need to map more plaques today. Unfortunately mapping offline will not be possible as then the data will not be available to MS Soundscape. I have passed your query on to my technical contact, who is also in touch with the Soundscape team and has considerable experience with OSM in the hope that this can be resolved.

Kind regards

Neil
ElsieHeart (2021-05-25 08:00:41+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Thanks very much for your helpful comments. I was deliberating whether to suggest the Commemorative Plaque or not, so thank you for confirming. I've amended the Bull Inn now and the school project will amend the rest. The plaques actually form part of a numbered historical trail http://www.wheathampsteadheritage.org.uk/village-centre-trail.asp - I have put this in the description, but if you have any other recommendations about how to tag   I would be grateful for the suggestion. I couldn't see anything on the Open Plaques site but can get in touch with them.
Regards,
Linda
Kovoschiz (2021-05-24 15:46:10+00:00): At least in HK, there is ambiguity with what `bus=` means, so I add `bus=private` + `bus:conditional=yes @ (*)`. Another editor uses a less general `bus:*=`.
user_1566574 (2021-06-04 16:25:18+00:00): Bonjour,
Vos modifications vont être révoquées. Supprimer cette allée est une dégradation, laquelle si elle est encore supprimée pourra vous valoir un bannissement pour vandalisme.

Cartographiquement. 🗺️
Kovoschiz (2021-05-24 15:42:10+00:00): `:*-Latn=` is a code. It must be uppercase.
Kovoschiz (2021-05-24 15:44:08+00:00): Same as `*:*-Hant=`. This is specified in IETP BCP 47, similar to ISO 3166 country and subdivision codes.
eggie (2021-05-24 17:04:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MaxR_6429 (2024-10-18 12:49:29+00:00): Hello, 
The fire hydrant (Nœud : 8761485217) was already existing with detailled info and accurate location 
Your POI is a duplicate 
Thanks for your understanding
UNGSC_ethicallens (2021-05-24 18:12:11+00:00):  #UNSOS #UNGSC #UniteMaps
tux67 (2021-05-26 08:31:53+00:00): Keine Quelle, kein Kommentar
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105233484
cobizobi (2021-05-26 12:21:59+00:00): Quelle: Lokales Wissen
Luzandro (2021-05-29 04:15:54+00:00): Hallo,

wenn der Bereich zu einer Hundesportschule gehört, warum hast du es dann von dog_park auf park geändert?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=dog%20park?uselang=de

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=park?uselang=de
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105233674
eggie (2021-05-24 17:46:08+00:00): Dag Jaap... bicycle=yes is al default op een fietspad.. net als foot-yes.
bicycle=yes heb ik verwijderd. Je hebt er immers een fietspad van gemaakt. foot=yes kan overigens geen kwaad, maar hoeft niet. 

Tagging van de drie klassen van fietspaden gaat als volgt.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 
Dus wellicht weet je wel bord er staat vooraan. Geen bord fietspad dan is het een highway=path

Mapse
eggie
atuito (2021-05-25 08:44:47+00:00): Hi foxysrider,

I'm not sure the access tags you've changed here are quite right - footway implies that it's designated for pedestrians, but you've added bicycle=designated as well. I'm also not sure if access=no is necessary here, implies it isn't open to the general public.

Many thanks, atuito
southglos (2021-05-24 14:54:15+00:00): Reverted - see discussion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105094684
eggie (2021-05-25 09:32:37+00:00): Lijkt me correct.
Je kunt wel nog eens kijken bij highway=track naar welke tracktype erbij hoort.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:Map_Features:tracktype

mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-05-25 09:30:15+00:00): Dag Jaap.. Je vraagt feedback. Lijkt mij oke zo
MVG
eggie
UNGSC_ethicallens (2021-05-24 18:12:04+00:00):  #UNSOS #UNGSC #UniteMaps
jmty8 (2021-05-24 14:45:34+00:00): deleted duplicate road
joost schouppe (2022-06-23 07:15:46+00:00): Hoi Sylle,
Ik passeerde hier gisteren: fietsers mogen hier niet in beide richtingen. Ik heb het aangepast.
BCNorwich (2021-05-24 18:47:59+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the multipolygon relation for the 5 houses reverting the addresses. Retagged Way: 119472447 as a track, as it is used by vehicles for agricultural access. I've amended the pharmacy tagging to OSM practice, amenity=pharmacy implies a building and there's no need for two pharmacy tags.

Regards Bernard.
!bm (2021-06-01 18:06:19+00:00): Hallo MariusEbe,

auf Basis welcher Quellen hast du hier Indoor-Mapping (in Regierungsgebäuden) betrieben? (Siehe meine Anm zu Quellenangaben in [1]; die im Cs angegebenen imagery_used=* sind dafür unzureichend). Sind das öffentlich zugängliche Informationen?

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105182706

--besteGrüße!bm
!bm (2021-06-20 21:51:21+00:00): Reichstagkuppel:
Changesets 105925439, 105565321, 105235219 revertiert/korrigiert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106681866
Friendly_Ghost (2022-10-31 09:31:00+00:00): Hoi Lucien, je bent hier iets te enthousiast te werk gegaan met het mappen van landuse; een enkele boom is zeker nog geen bos: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946508651
Lachgast (2022-10-31 09:39:41+00:00): Dat is een filosofische stellingname. Maar ik ben het met je eens dat dit op zijn hoogst gras had moeten zijn (of dat enkele boompje). Maar dit is uit mijn soloboomloze periode, dus behoorde dat tot de logica.
Lachgast (2022-10-31 09:40:24+00:00): Hoe ben jij trouwens in Bovenkarspel verzeild geraakt? ;)
Friendly_Ghost (2022-10-31 22:44:46+00:00): Ach, je hebt tenminste de BGT overgetrokken en niet de boomkroon als vlak ingetekend. 

Vaak genoeg zoek ik een willekeurig stukje Nederland op waarvan ik het idee heb dat er nog wel het een en ander te vernieuwen valt m.b.v. de BGT & luchtfoto, en daar ga ik dan een uurtje mee aan de slag. Zo ook hier vandaag ;)
Lachgast (2022-10-31 23:26:29+00:00): Grappig dat je Bovenkarspel hebt gekozen. Richting Enkhuizen is er inderdaad nog wel werk te doen, verder ben ik binnen de gemeente Drechterland wel redelijk grondig te werk gegaan (al zie ik ook wel nog "grijze plekken" op de kaart).
Ik hanteer een vergelijkbare aanpak: als ik naar een mij onbekende plek moet reizen bereid ik mij voor door de plaats van bestemming flink onder handen te nemen. Ook een advertentie op Woningnet is een dankbare aanleiding om eens ergens in te duiken.
Komadinovic Vanja (2021-06-07 10:19:08+00:00): Поздрав Дујо,

Возао сам се мало бајсом са викенд  ( https://www.wikiloc.com/mountain-biking-trails/istrazhivanje-divchibara-75217715 ) и делује ми да ова улица не постоји ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/946509685 ). Могуће да сам нешто омашио, који ти је извор за ово?
Duja (2021-06-07 11:31:22+00:00): Taj severni deo se vidi na satelitu, a taj južni sam onda malo ekstrapolirao :D, jer se do tih kuća iza vatrogasnog doma mora nekako stići. Slobodno prepravljaj. 

Fali i ona nova ogromna vila Vrh na krivini, ali nisam jesenas snimio tačan položaj, pa ako znaš...
Komadinovic Vanja (2021-06-07 12:02:35+00:00): Договор, гради се овде баш тако да тешко да ортофото може помогне, једино ако је дневни :)
Duja (2021-06-07 12:08:54+00:00): FYI, ovde imaš dnevni, ali je baš lošeg kvaliteta: 
https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2&lat=44.11254039274199&lng=19.998207092285156&zoom=16
Komadinovic Vanja (2021-06-07 12:33:40+00:00): Е страва, нисам знао за ово, хвала.
eggie (2021-05-24 17:05:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
RobJN (2021-07-11 18:41:09+00:00): That's a shame that these businesses are now longer there. Has anything replaced them?

P.S. Is the Natwest ATM still there? If not, that can be removed from the map too.

Thanks,
Rob
atuito (2021-05-25 08:11:40+00:00): Hi foxysrider,

I see you've converted this parking aisle to a cycleway with access tags for motor vehicles & pedestrians. 
However, I think it's more accurate to be a service road/parking aisle with access permissions for cyclists & pedestrians. Cycleway implies that it is designated for bicycles, which isn't the case here, and the service road rendering would make more sense to me.

Many thanks,
atuito
atuito (2021-05-25 08:07:53+00:00): Hi foxysrider, welcome to OSM!

I see you've changed the permissions for this track to access=no, however I don't think that's quite right. The general public can currently walk along the track, as well as cyclists/horse riders I believe, so access=no has stopped routing for these other modes of transport.

Additionally, access=no changes the rendering to a desaturated/greyed out look, the same as the tracks to the south which are in fact private, so this change is likely to create confusion about which paths are open to the public.

Many thanks,
atuito
DaveF (2021-07-26 11:32:49+00:00): These are service roads.
SafetyIng (2021-05-24 17:23:49+00:00): Was für eine Attraktion ist denn da?
eggie (2021-05-24 17:13:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ndm (2021-05-24 20:58:35+00:00): This looks like a duplicate of the parking aisle.
foxysrider (2021-05-24 21:08:28+00:00): the cycle route goes through the car park
ndm (2021-05-24 23:20:01+00:00): There shouldn't be overlaping ways for the same item - just add "bicycle=yes" to the existing parking lane.
cyton (2022-02-24 19:06:04+00:00): again, streetname without street
eggie (2021-05-24 17:16:45+00:00): Tip  Het gebied van je  changeset is zo groot omdat je de weg aan de grens van de wijk hebt geplakt.
Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken bij intekenen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-05-24 17:19:50+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway
Je toegangsweg zat niet vast aan de St Annastraat maar aan de wijkgrens. 
Fixed..
gr eggie
ndm (2021-05-24 21:31:17+00:00): This looks like a bmx-style racetrack, rather than a track for agricultural vehicles -- did you survey this?
GinaroZ (2022-01-20 19:33:45+00:00): Probably better to use the amenity=social_facility tag instead?
FlawOfAverages (2022-01-20 20:52:05+00:00): Thanks, I've added 
amenity=social_facility
social_facility=group_home
social_facility:for=senior

Hopefully this is what you were after.
eggie (2021-05-24 17:22:35+00:00): Mocht het nog verkeerd in de BAG staan dan doorgeven via hyn website anders komt het oude gebouw  bij periodieke update weer terug in OSM.
Doe je zelf een terugmelding?
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=sint%20annastraat%20256&resultOffset=0&objectId=0268100000012845&geometry.x=187421.19&geometry.y=426835.00199978&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0268010000029466

MVG
eggie
TomPar (2021-10-27 03:48:00+00:00): FYI: I removed private CR altogether.  IMHO, these should have never been added in the first place.  They were included on the MassGIS OpenSpace import from a decade ago.  They cause confusion as they are often mapped like "public lands".

That being said, the trails here appear to be heavily used (from Strava heatmap data).  Do you know if the landowner allowed the use of the trails?  There may be an informal "permissive" use of the trails like I know in other areas adjacent to public conservation parcels.  If so, this would warrant keeping them mapped in OSM.  Thanks.
JuanjoMC (2021-06-06 11:17:39+00:00): Hi,

I reverted this changeset. The fact that a way is private is not a reason to remove it from the map, it should be tagged as such instead, and this one was already marked as private.
As an exemple, houses are private and we map them.

Cheers
eggie (2021-05-24 17:25:35+00:00): Welkom bij OSM
Kleine aanpassing. Info samengevoegd met de huidige adresnode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-05-24 17:30:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  access=no heb ik maar gelijk van het paaltje gehaald. Dat stond ook nog verkeerd. 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SafetyIng (2021-06-13 19:06:00+00:00): Hey
du hast die Adressen gedoppelt.
Die waren jedoch auch schon an den Gebäuden.
Adressen sollten nur einmal vorgenommen werden.....
Ist dir wohl in der ganzen Straße passiert....
user_5359 (2021-05-24 19:23:16+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys.?
osm_id=679753429
timestamp=2013-03-18T14:25:44Z
type=police
eggie (2021-05-24 17:30:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
ndm (2021-05-24 21:25:40+00:00): There's no one-way markings visible on satellite imagery, given tree cover. Bing shows it as a cul-de-sac from A366 (necessarily two-way) https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=f70f66a5-0f98-4376-b48c-bcb9533cd932&cp=51.314973~-2.299937&lvl=19&dir=302.45245&pi=-6.536615&style=x&mo=z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027 Mapillary also shows it as a dead end from A366.

From A36 Mapillary shows it as 2-way, as does Bing Streetside https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=7a4e5f6a-6c92-4d49-afba-6db7519997ad&cp=51.318157~-2.309885&lvl=19&dir=137.589&pi=-8.623945&style=x&mo=om.1~z.0&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027
phodgkin (2021-06-27 20:30:03+00:00): Sorry - hope you don't think I'm picking on your edits! I'm fixing this to a culvert going underneath the path.

Paul H.
MPaine (2021-06-29 09:28:08+00:00): Hi Paul,
It's absolutely no worries, I'm still getting to grips with it so any changes you make are teaching me something as well. Thank you for the support!
Matthew
eggie (2021-05-24 17:32:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-05-24 17:33:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Anisa IRM-ED (2021-06-29 06:29:17+00:00): Hola @kaxtillo.
Espero que lo estés haciendo bien.
Encontré un cruce de carretera con este cuerpo de agua (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/100354063), hay un puente o alcantarilla?

Le importaría solucionar este problema? o avíseme si hay alguna actualización en esta área.
Gracias, feliz mapeo!

traducido por Google
Anisa IRM-ED (2021-06-29 22:58:36+00:00): gracias por contribuir a solucionar este problema.

Que tengas un buen día y un saludo!
habi (2021-11-23 16:42:19+00:00): Ciao pxdthfg
We're allowed to use the 'official building outlines' from the cadastral survey in Bern, and the user ydrgbjo traced the Kantonales Jugendamt-building nicely from it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67040802
Nearly all buildings outlines in Bern are drawn according to this so-called MOPUBE, I thus reverted your changeset, since the building outline was drawn correctly before.
Greetings,
Habid
SafetyIng (2021-05-24 17:25:37+00:00): Was heißt denn "nicht mehr passierbar"?
matchman (2021-05-25 21:32:14+00:00): Nicht mehr zu nutzen. Nicht mehr zu erkennen.
atuito (2021-05-25 08:38:53+00:00): Hi foxysrider, 

Did you do a survey to determine this is a footway not a track?

Many thanks, atuito
ChromeLotus (2021-05-25 17:32:05+00:00): Correction: Source used was DigitalGlobe 2021-05-03
atuito (2021-05-25 08:50:28+00:00): Hi foxysrider,

Did you determine this track was private based on a current survey? I believe it's a designated bridleway, so access=private wouldn't be correct here.

Many thanks, atuito