piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bolt026 (2023-01-06 08:56:57+00:00): Hi Rick :) Happy New Year!

I see that you've added a barrier=kerb on highway=unclassified at this location: 48.7195258, 21.2612904. Because barrier=kerb blocks the access for cars in OSRM, the entire road, from intersection with Biela (48.7236466, 21.258357), to intersection with Krmanova (48.7194417, 21.2618784 and 48.7191833, 21.261079) becomes inaccessible, due to oneway street, and no other way to exit that street.
So routes are created to the closest accessible roads: https://map.project-osrm.org/?z=17&center=48.722124%2C21.262107&loc=48.720046%2C21.252451&loc=48.722913%2C21.258727&hl=en&alt=0&srv=0
I can’t find enough evidence, except for Maxar Premium Imagery (which is not super clear), to see exactly what is changed at the entrance of that parking where barrier=kerb is added. Can you please take a look and let me know if this issue can be fixed somehow? 
Thank you in advance!

Regards,
Catalina
aceman444 (2023-01-08 10:18:14+00:00): Spravne, na priechod v strede cesty sa nedava barrier=kerb, ale len kerb=*
Rick Richards (2023-01-10 19:33:25+00:00): Hi Bolt, thanks for explanation. During my next "problem resolving changes" in OSM I will be more cautious. Fixed with: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131119387#map=19/48.71953/21.26129

@aceman444 taktiež vďaka, pri resolvovaní problémov si dám väčší pozor na takéto chyby..
Bolt026 (2023-01-11 06:50:07+00:00): Hey :) no worries!
Thank you so much for the quick update! 
And thank you @aceman444!

Happy mapping! 🗺️
Langlaeufer (2022-09-01 19:41:09+00:00): Ähm, wurde der Keisverkehr entfernt, oder warum geht jetzt der Fußweg mitten hindurch?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125665172
Langlaeufer (2022-09-01 19:51:48+00:00): ok, kreisverkehr ist tatsächlich verschwunden
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125665172
tesp (2022-09-05 12:27:07+00:00): Hei!
Näitä paikkapisteitä käytetään merkitsemään paikannimiä eikä niinkään kuntien nimiä. Akaan kaupunki löytyy rajarelaationa: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2389014
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-09-03 13:30:03+00:00): Nu har jeg rettet "propsed" tags en del gange. 
Fx https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091057675

Jeg gætter på at din JOSM har cachet det.
parsd51 (2022-09-03 16:31:51+00:00): Tak for du har set det, rettet det og skrevet, det er jeg glad for :-)

Jeg overpass’er lige Danmark og får alle rettet - og min cache.
gscholz (2022-09-02 10:14:19+00:00): Hi Don_Ojeda,
thsi changeset has created errros in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-60.27601&lat=-31.60766&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.73&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125665314

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Mazda05 (2022-09-12 20:00:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war
Mazda05 (2022-09-12 20:10:00+00:00): https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#n725
Langlaeufer (2022-09-01 19:38:21+00:00): Hi sacky,
schau dir mal die Definition von parking_isle an. Zufahrten und Durchfahrten werden damit nicht getaggt. sondern nur die Weg unmittelbar bei den Stellplätzen sofern diese nicht Grundstückszufahrt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125666182
julcnx (2022-09-02 09:02:45+00:00): Hi Hervella. Thanks for your contributions. Do you know if Osmose Editor can split changeset in smaller geographical (e.g. country size) ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125666861
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-09-09 17:22:36+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9993356658/history has maxspeed:source = sign that was added in this edit
is it intentionally used instead of source:maxspeed=sign ? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asource%3Amaxspeed%3Dsign

maxspeed:type is also sometimes used as a key for such data, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:type
Josef73 (2023-01-14 14:37:51+00:00): Hello, is the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025117685 open to 12am or 12pm?
JaggedRubber55 (2023-01-14 14:42:04+00:00): 12am
JaggedRubber55 (2023-01-14 14:43:18+00:00): I guess by documentationthat makes it 24? Sorry for the confusion
Josef73 (2023-01-14 15:10:39+00:00): No Problem. Thanks
flohoff (2022-09-04 11:12:07+00:00): Moin,
ich hab hier mit dem Wohnwagenstellplatz so meine Bauchschmerzen. Ersten ist der name eine Beschreibung. Das muss also in die Description. name ist ausschliesslich für Eigennamen, nicht für beschreibendes. Die 10€ in der description gehören in ein fee=yes und ggfs kann man auch die Gebühr wirklich angeben, halte ich aber für eher schlecht weil das in OSM nichts zu suchen hat. Wir haben ja auch keine Menukarten der Restaurants.


Also guck dir das nochmal an.

Flo
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 07:18:14+00:00): What you meant by shop=plastic at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9993397629/history ?

What kind of plastic objects are they selling there? Are they really selling solely plastic objects?

Is maybe one of shops listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop a better fit?
redd (2022-09-01 19:52:54+00:00): thanks!
Vil4ckc (2022-10-17 07:48:03+00:00): Якщо ви уточнєюте назву вулиці то робіть також у зв'язку
Tilia_J (2022-09-02 15:15:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

MVG,

Tilia ,

Namens de OSM Community
Strubbl (2022-09-01 21:39:19+00:00): Hi Fred, wenn der Weg nicht mehr zu erkennen ist, könnte man auf den Lifecycle-Präfix razed: benutzen statt access auf no zu setzen. access=no hinzuzufügen bedeutet hier, dass der Weg noch existiert, aber kein Zugang erlaubt ist.

razed-Doku: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:razed:
orthocircular (2022-09-01 22:42:46+00:00): Please avoid making changes that span cities or states, it makes the change really hard to view and notifies hundreds of people.
gscholz (2022-09-04 05:25:11+00:00): Hi  KwaXoloXolo,
you recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=31.79531&lat=-25.55493&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=31.79531&lat=-25.55493&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
user_1566574 (2022-10-23 21:08:00+00:00): Salut !
Bravo, merci pour cet edit ! Tu as fait ça dans toute la France ?
Frans S (2022-09-30 14:09:34+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
I reviewed most of your changesets here. 
Please pay attention to next points:
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125670156
4b696d (2022-09-02 15:33:45+00:00): Nee, kein fix. Ganz im Gegenteil. Regionalstelle != Ortsverband. Ich habe es rückgängig gemacht.
Strubbl (2022-09-02 15:51:46+00:00): 👍
paunofu (2023-02-02 10:28:44+00:00): Bon dia, Jordi.

Els consultoris, sobretot en zones rurals els etiquete com a "doctors", ja que rarament tenen més d'un metge i/o infermera i fins i tot no obrin tots els dies.

Espere la teua opinió. Salutacions, Pau.
Jordi MF (2023-02-02 11:02:36+00:00): Així pensava jo, abans. Però, en algun moment, algú va dir, o vaig llegir en algun lloc, que era millor amenity=clinic. Per això ara ho faig així. No tinc cap inconvenient en canviar, però després de tants anys, la feinada de revertir els tots els consultoris que he afegit pot ser bonica. Bé, supose que amb una cerca per 'name' a través d'Overpass no costaria tant...
Sí, també li veig més sentit a utilitzar 'doctor'.
Salut,
Jordi
Jordi MF (2023-02-02 13:24:12+00:00): Ja he corregit tots els de Castelló i alguns de la Marina, com este. En queden per corregir uns quants entre Gandia i València, i des de Calp cap al sud. He fet servir esta cerca en Overpass:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1qTP
Salut,
Jordi
paunofu (2023-02-02 15:59:13+00:00): Bona vesprada, 
he corregit la teua consulta per a que siga un poc més precisa. Permet buscar per àrees en compte de bbox i busca qualsevol cosa que no siga un doctors però que al nom té Consultori, té falsos positius com veterinaris o parades d'autobús, però també detecta consultoris que estan com a hospitals o sols com a building. 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1qU2

Salutacions, Pau.
abakus_uploader (2022-09-01 22:30:58+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2022-09-19 10:57:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please pay attention to this point:
* Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects, the standard tagging is 'building=yes' No text adding.  Please keep that in mind at further mappings.
Best regards
Silva1989 (2023-03-17 18:36:04+00:00): Hi Seichter,
I hope everything is fine. What is the purpose of this edit?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125670838
From my understanding It's just a mass deletion of nodes. Is there any advantage in removing almost all of the highly detailed turns of the trail?
seichter (2023-03-17 19:15:46+00:00): To me that was just the conversion of something like a GPS track to a GPS way.
Such a high density of waypoints pretends an accuray that isn't true.
Looking at the trail together with raw data in JOSM, e.g tracks uploaded by other users, the now simplified way follows the trend of these GPS tracks rather well. I couldn't identify any missing turns.

There are some slight deviations from arial imagery, but I trust more in a bundle of GPS tracks than in imagery which trends to be distorted in mountain areas.
seichter (2023-03-17 19:16:24+00:00): correction:
GPS track to OSM way
Silva1989 (2023-03-21 15:53:49+00:00): Hi Seichter,

I understand your point, as well as your motivations.
I've made the Caldeira Trail numerous times. Once, I recorded the trail with a Garmin Dakota GPS. It has an accuracy of less than 2 meters every 0.5s.
The previous version of the way was already a simplifyed and averaged version of the GPS track. It wasn't particularly sourced from aerial imagery, yes, imagery is very distorted near a ridge.
That's why I said it represented the turns. Yes, a trail like this has numerous turns that can be mapped using such a device. This is useful for runners for instance so that they get a feel of how technical a path can be.
https://forcanasola.blogspot.com/2009/11/ilha-do-faial-caldeira.html
seichter (2023-04-02 10:28:50+00:00): Sorry, a single GPS track does not show the details of a trail even after some simplifying. There is an inherent jitter of more than 2 m even for the latest Garmin  2-frequency devices. If you record the same trail on different occasions you will see the difference,
I am using at the moment seven loggers in parallel, three of them with 2-freq-chips. I then do an weighted average of them. The single tracks have an rms deviation of typical 1 to 3 m, but single trackpoints may often exceed 5 m from the averaged track. The accuracy shown by the devices is always overoptimistic.
In short: You cannot rely on the turns from a single GPS track.
Richard (2022-09-02 14:13:42+00:00): Hi - you've changed the operator of the Moreton Co-op from Midcounties to the (Manchester) Co-op Group. Are you sure about this? Midcounties bought the Warners Budgens stores a couple of years ago and it seems vanishingly unlikely they've sold it onto the Manchester group.
Null07 (2022-09-02 22:59:52+00:00): It is, Shows up as Co-operative food shop, should be set as that but probably shouldn’t mark that as Manchester Co-op type.
Thanks for saying. (should add both Co-op types to the editor or mark it out)
dzamper (2025-04-04 16:47:17+00:00): Oznaczenie tych przejść jako przejścia z sygnalizacją jest trochę mylące, one nigdy w swojej kilkunastoletniej historii nie pracowały a od niedawna nawet nie migają na żółto
Mariusz Dykierek (2025-04-04 17:28:23+00:00): Dawno tamtędy nie jechałem i nie mogę z tym stwierdzeniem dyskutować. Światła na "pewnych" zdjęciach street-level jeszcze w czerwcu ubiegłego roku co nieco świeciły i pewnie tylko migającym żółtym. Niemniej jednak światła tam stoją, przyciski na słupkach są i nie znam przyczyn dla których są wyłączone. Ktoś przesadził przy projektowaniu, czy Zabrze na prądzie oszczędza, czy nikt nie jest w stanie ogarnąć programowania tych świateł? Jeśli uważasz, że powinny być "zwykłe" marked, możesz zmienić. Protestował nie będę. Może notkę warto przy nich zrobić...
Tilia_J (2022-09-02 08:21:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.
MVG,

Tilia_J ,

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-09-03 08:08:24+00:00): Dag The GabeMan..
Je vraagt feedback.. 
In zo'n geval kun je het beste een opmerking op de kaart zetten. Rechts in het scherm bij het wolkje, maar ik denk dat je er rustig van uit kunt gaan dat het kennelijk niet de bedoeling is dat je er mag fietsen en vanaf welk punt  (Het bankje?).
Groet
eggie
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-02 04:56:30+00:00): Pagal LT susitarimus, atskirais vektoriais nebraižome šaligatvių, kai jie nuo gatvės nėra atskirti fiziškai (bent metru žolės ar pan.).
V-Li (2022-12-01 11:09:11+00:00): Das war natürlich mit viel Fleiß Fußwege ergänzt, es fehlen leider Übergänge, so dass einige nicht-routingfähige Objekte entstehen (siehe https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=107&error=137106011), das Fußgängerrouting ist damit potentiell kaputt. Eine Auszeichnung des Fußwegs als Eigenschaft der Straße wäre vielleicht in Mosbach besser, da die Komplexität der Fußwege eher gering ist (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Gehsteig).
gscholz (2022-09-04 05:24:35+00:00): Hi  KwaXoloXolo,
you recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=31.79531&lat=-25.55493&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=31.79531&lat=-25.55493&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
KwaXoloXolo (2022-09-04 09:59:51+00:00): Thanks Guido, will do - newbie error, thanks for pointing it out.
emersonveenstra (2022-09-08 11:32:11+00:00): Hi,

The `lanes` value on these sections of highway are now different then the number of lanes in the `change:lanes` tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/183521648
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091102911
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091107523
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/701472155
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1063760399

Would you mind going through those and fixing them please? Thanks!
ZeLonewolf (2022-12-08 16:07:32+00:00): Thanks for doing this.  If you're inclined, there's still a whole bunch of errant objects that come up on a name search for "River Thames" in the area, especially stray or side_stream ways that need to get added to the main waterway relation.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-12-08 16:52:15+00:00): You're very welcome. I'm well aware of the remaining parts that need attention. I hope I can make time for it, but it's one thing in a long list of OSM objects to clean up.
user_2066394 (2022-09-01 23:30:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56315003
ist jetzt nicht mehr verbunden mit der St 2105
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536108953
Verbindung aktuell nur noch mit dem Radweg.
user_2066394 (2022-09-04 08:22:27+00:00): Verbindung wiederhergestellt.

@rms_SBAB prüft nochmal die Position der Bushaltestelle.
VA00 (2024-04-17 06:06:51+00:00): Czy ta ścieżyneczka szerokości 0.5 m naprawdę ma nazwę? I skąd tam peeblestone, zwykła ziemia.
Leo Slager (2022-09-02 15:30:17+00:00): Nice work here.
I changed type=multipolygoon into type=building.
in accordance with wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
VLD190 (2022-09-02 17:15:59+00:00): Hi Leo Slager,

Thank you, and thanks for taking a look at the relation. Can you give some context on why you changed the relation type from type=multipolygon into type=building?"
Leo Slager (2022-09-02 17:51:54+00:00): Hello VLD90,
By definition it is not a multipolygoon.
A multipolygoon consists of 1 outer and a number of inners. The inners are completly surrounded by the outer.
The building:parts may be put into a relation.
The relation is described in the above mentioned wiki.
This kind of relation has 1 outline and several building:parts with role=part.
So this is all in the wiki.

Nice to know that in the Netherlands all buildings and the adress-nodes are imported from the government office: Kadaster. So the outline of the building is on the correct location.
Leo Slager (2022-09-02 17:57:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Types_of_relation
Tilia_J (2022-09-02 08:24:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht.

MVG,

Tilia_J ,

Namens de OSM Community
map per (2022-11-11 16:08:49+00:00): Hallo AP_MUC,

Bei U-Bahn Eingängen solte name=* nicht für den Namen der U-Bahnstation verwendet werden (siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:railway=subway%20entrance?uselang=de). Habs korrigiert.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
map per (2022-11-11 16:10:13+00:00): Was hat dieser Edit eigentlich mit "gehwegen" zu tun? (siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments#Warum_sollte_ich_%C3%84nderungssatz-Kommentare_nutzen?)
bkil (2022-09-01 23:19:29+00:00): Köszönjük a sok értékes közreműködést. Szeretném felhívni viszont a figyelmet, hogy Foxpost automatából kettő van felvéve a térképre az OMV mellett. Lehetne törölni az újabbat és a helyes helyre behúzni a régit? https://osm.org/node/9903560783 https://osm.org/node/9501119853
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
Langlaeufer (2022-09-02 06:51:29+00:00): Sind sie denn dann auch mit "Radfahrer frei" beschildert?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125675322
matipau (2022-09-02 11:36:45+00:00): Nein, tatsächlich nicht. Ich habe bicycle=yes nun entfernt (changeset #125694730).
Langlaeufer (2022-09-02 11:46:54+00:00): Danke und frohes Mappen.
mariotomo (2022-09-02 20:55:01+00:00): hola. siendo 'mariotomo' ese que sigues mencionando como 'el editor anterior', estoy intentando llegar a un entendimiento. has grabado trazas tú mismo con Mapillary, y las he utilizadas para corregir tus ediciones. y sigues borrando lo que hago. porqué? han quitado las señales octagonales que se ven en las fotos mapillary?
mariotomo (2022-09-02 21:08:04+00:00): reverted in changeset:125715969
Alvarado2510 (2023-04-23 22:38:58+00:00): yo corregí la señalización del los altos a lo largo de la calle C Sur, lamentablemente, lo tenias mal ubicado, utilice mapillary como referencia para que notes que te equivocaste.
Alvarado2510 (2023-04-23 22:41:44+00:00): me toco volver a corregír, mariotomo si tienes alguna duda con los cruce de la calle C sur, con mucho gusto te ayudo, pero como lo editaste estanban errados.
%20Bunny (2022-09-19 10:59:10+00:00): Thanks for doing this update.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-23 12:55:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696048437/history

surface=spur? what you wanted express here?
Osmosefixer2021 (2022-09-02 01:03:50+00:00): Source: Bing Aerial Imagery
adamh (2022-12-21 01:10:04+00:00): If this is properly open now, then we should probably remove the access=no ?
Poltroon (2022-12-21 04:04:49+00:00): Thanks.  I missed that.
InsertUser (2022-09-02 07:11:45+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

This appears to be the third time a node for this tank has been added here. Have you got the latest map downloaded?

Also the name tag for tank should be the name only. The description of the contents can go in a description tag, or even better using tank specific tags in the advanced part of the OsmAnd editor or with another editor like Vespucci.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank
Himké (2022-10-02 03:29:06+00:00): There was no need to delete features and then re-add them (with incorrect tagging to boot)
Niiepce (2022-09-03 15:05:53+00:00): Hallo,
Wieso haben sie hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46188835) highway=path zu highway=footway geändert?
user_9648254 (2022-09-03 15:41:50+00:00): ganz einfach, weil ein Fussweg ist und kein Pfad!