piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Bernhard W (2017-11-26 13:16:37+00:00): Hallo Manuel Jehle, am 14.08.2017 hast du in Meersburg zahlreiche Knoten mit allen dazugehörigen Attributen in der OSM-Datenbank gelöscht. Änderungskommentar ist "fghfgh". Ich habe deine Änderungen revertiert, weil viele Löschungen nachweislich falsch sind.

Bitte ändere Daten ausschließlich dann wenn du sicher bist und hinterlasse stets einen aussagekräftigen Änderungskommentar. 
Wenn du nicht sicher bist, frage einen OSM-Kollegen aus deiner Nähe oder den, der die letzte Änderung eingetragen hat oder melde dich im Forum <https://forum.openstreetmap.org> an und frage dort die große Gemeinschaft, z. B. bei "users: Germany". Dort erhälst du auch Hilfen für den Einstieg in OSM.
joaquin111 (2017-08-14 16:42:21+00:00): Real State in Algecioras
joaquin111 (2017-08-14 16:42:55+00:00): Real State in Algeciras
www.elijocasa.es
Mike Baggaley (2017-08-15 14:14:15+00:00): Hi, on way 515616161 you have set access=residents. Please use access=private for roads that can only be accessed by residents. "private" will be interpreted by routing software as it is a standard value, whereas "residents" will be ignored as it is non-standard. You could add a note to say access for residents if you think that is important.

Cheers,
Mike
jim197 (2017-08-15 14:19:45+00:00): Fair enough. I only used it because it was an option offered by iD. I will switch to 'private'.
Jim
Mike Baggaley (2017-08-15 15:01:21+00:00): Interesting, I hadn't realised it was an option in iD (I can't get on with it). I see there was a proposal to add access=resident (not access=residents) back in 2011, but it was never adopted.
Mike
jim197 (2017-08-15 15:12:01+00:00): It turns out iD isn't even consistent with itself. I now notice that its pull-down menu of access tag values in the 'All tags' section includes 'residents', but its pull-down menu of access tag values in the 'All fields' section doesn't! Sadly I was going by the former, silly me.
Jim
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-08-15 17:20:12+00:00): Czemu usunąłeś junction=roundabout z ronda, hm? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/197638246
manoharuss (2017-08-16 06:59:32+00:00): Hi kpedji georges,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But I have observed that the motorway you have added here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515616597/ is probably a residential road and not a motorway. Please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway for understanding highway classification on OpenStreetMap. It would be great if you can correct your edits. May I also suggest http://learnosm.org/en/ for quickly getting started on tagging schema and common mapping practices.

Thank you,

Manohar
user_5359 (2017-08-21 18:07:04+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! So wie Du es eingezeichnet hast, ist bereits ab Hausnummer 28 kein Auto zugelassen. Zu dem werden solche Sperren durch Sperren (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:barrier, Abschnitt Barrieren) auf der Straße dokumentiert.
Paul d G (2017-08-30 12:00:02+00:00): Hallo user_5359, vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Da ich noch neu bin und mich erst einfinden muss, bitte ich um Vergebung. Ich denke, dass ich hier einen "bollard" am Ende von Haus Nr. 44 setzen muss.
user_5359 (2017-08-30 12:15:58+00:00): Hallo, kein Problem, alle habe mal klein angefangen. Noch viel Spaß mit OSM!
nurdafur (2024-02-28 15:26:26+00:00): Hallo TuxFuxCH
Ich bin über diese Änderung von dir von 2017 gestolpert. Da hast du die Hausnummer 101 in zwei Teile aufgespaltet und dann eine Relation erstellt. Mir wird nicht ersichtlich, was das für einen Zweck hatte. Hast du vielleicht eine wage Erinnerung daran?
Liebe Grüsse
Urs
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 05:58:30+00:00): hey Jesfer, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. i have traced the polygon. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
Alecs01 (2017-08-15 13:55:05+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, please pay attention, you changed the name of three villages in Tunisia, I restored the original names http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/352752197/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1544821258/history http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/674390463/history
SafwatHalaby_repair (2017-09-10 08:48:54+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء اضافة اماكن ذات اهمية عامة فقط وعدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please avoid adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only. Reverted.
Stereo (2017-08-14 20:45:20+00:00): That must have been a pleasant survey :).
Mike Baggaley (2017-08-15 14:10:55+00:00): Hi Russ, in this change you seem to have added access=designated to way 324329569. This is an invalid value for access= and should only be used for specific transport modes such as foot=designated for a public footpath. As the road leads to a caravan site, I would expect that it should be access=private. Is this what you intended?

Thanks,
Mike
Russ McD (2017-08-15 21:29:39+00:00): Thanks Mike,
Yes, my mistake - the Potlatch hint was a bit confusing and after reading the Wiki, have changed it to Private as you suggest.
Rgds.
user_6110846 (2017-08-21 11:07:18+00:00): Перестаньте придумывать немецкие названия .Немецкий язык традиции  перевода советских времен  изменил на новые. -   через английский язык полностью . Или через английский язык но  с передачей некоторых букв в немецком написании. Поетому ета правка будет отменена. Также ета правка нарушает wiki-правило о транслитерации.
user_6110846 (2017-08-21 11:07:54+00:00): Как и другие с подозрительгным в качестве перевода правки.
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 05:53:00+00:00): hey bennokf, welcome to OSM. i appreciate your interest in mapping. I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
bennokf (2017-08-18 13:43:07+00:00): Hi oormilavinod. Thank you for the comment. I wasn't shure how to identify the spot I mark. It is actually a spot with a source of water. A sort of a well. It is more like a closed tank really. But the place has a name and a path that leads to it. Maybe I can also draw the path also. 

Anyway could you tell me if there is another code in OpenStreetMap for a source?
neuhausr (2017-08-16 20:10:17+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I notice in this changeset and others, you are changing road names to use abbreviations. OSM guidelines specifically say to spell out words when possible, especially for road names. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29 for further explanation. Thanks and happy mapping!
wille (2017-08-15 18:38:14+00:00): Olá, Vilacimbre
wille (2017-08-15 18:42:47+00:00): Olá, Vilacimbre

Tudo bem?

Muito obrigado por suas inúmeras contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Você tem adicionado informações muito importantes, porém cometido alguns erros. Vou listá-lo aqui não com a intenção de repreender-te, mas sim de instruir para que nosso mapa fique cada vez melhor:

- Vi que você tem utilizado o Maps.Me e adicionado nomes de ruas como pubs, recomendo que não faça isso. Clique na rua e em editar. No campo comentário você digita o nome da rua que não estiver correto. Isso vai criar uma nota que podemos corrigir sem ter que mapear erroneamente como pub/bar.

- Não adicione nome do bairro ao nome da rua, nem o CEP. Você pode adicionar o CEP da rua colocando a tag postal_code=XXXXX-XXX (se não souber como, me pergunte).

- Os nomes de bairro não devem ser escritos com todas as letras maiúsculas, apenas as iniciais.

Mais uma vez, muito obrigado por suas contribuições. Caso tenha dúvidas, estou à disposição.

Abraços,
wille
userJeff (2017-08-14 20:46:33+00:00): Park boundaries approximate based on maps at minneapolisparks.org
user_6110846 (2017-08-15 12:26:08+00:00): переробіть правки з знаком кохання. Ці правки не відповідають вікі правилу про тег нейм
Myazyk (2017-08-29 09:17:29+00:00): Де є таке правило?
Фігура саме із знаком любові ж
user_6110846 (2017-08-29 13:06:35+00:00): пошук проекту не спрацьовує на такі знаки , подібне записується у тег inscription - @напис на пам ятнику чи на вивісці" 
Другий момент - індійський картограф виправив назву а ви її скасували. Це є війна редагувань - потрібно було на форумі запитати а не нав язувати свою позицію тупо і вперто.
Myazyk (2017-08-29 13:30:50+00:00): Два місяці у проекті, а все так знаєш
user_6110846 (2017-08-29 15:01:47+00:00):  Я прочитав форум рос і укр білорус  за 3 роки . Плюс завів серед старожилів друзі які у віддаленому режимі робюлять на моєму ком пбютері правки , вчать мене, навчили основним плагінам , сучасним методам картографування. Щоб ви знали я вже записав себе до "секти кадастру ". І різні фантазії щодо малювання меж не по кадастру н е визнаю.
user_6110846 (2017-08-29 11:38:13+00:00): ваші правки зі знаком кохання перероблені у формат проєкту. Прохання війну редагувань не влаштовувати а просто дотримуватись технології картографування та реагувати на пповідомлення
Domcsi (2017-08-15 19:17:36+00:00): Szia!
Mi ez a két túra nevű mtb út?
http://turistautak.openstreetmap.hu/turut-7473224
userJeff (2017-08-14 20:46:09+00:00): Park boundaries approximate based on maps at minneapolisparks.org
iandees (2017-08-15 01:05:59+00:00): Howdy! Please reconsider using multipolygons with as the border for parks. Very rarely do the park boundaries actually lay *on* the road, but rather on the parcel of land offset from the road. Using a multipolygon with the road makes it much harder to adjust the border of a park to match on the ground layout.
userJeff (2017-08-15 03:30:54+00:00): Hi. I'm relatively new to OSM and I like the feedback. But some thoughts...

I've noticed this is not a common way to represent parks. But the narrow and irregular gaps between roads and separately drawn  park boundaries that I've seen doesn't seem optimal either. Looks a tad sloppy. If the park boundary is known exactly, perhaps it makes sense to have a separate way for the boundary. But if not, it doesn't seem worth the extra data and effort to create parallel ways that don't represent the boundary any more accurately than the road itself.

Also, as in this case, the road is the practical boundary for a typical map user. On the ground, one side of the road are residential lawns and the other side is what's regarded as the park. Even if the actual boundary is known to be offset 10 or 20 feet from the centerline of the road, its not clear that information is important enough to warrant the complication additional way.
neuhausr (2017-08-28 20:43:48+00:00): @userJeff, OpenStreetMap is at core a project to create data which can be used to make maps, do routing, etc. Over years, guidelines have formed about the best way to do that, such as "map what's on the ground". You are mostly talking about the rendering of how the data looks and making assumptions about what *map* users want. However, what is most important to OSM is making the actual data as accurate as we can, so different *data* users can use it to make the maps, routers, or other things that they want. So, does the park actually go into the middle of the road? No, it stops next to the road. Therefore don't attach the park to the road. It may not seem relevant to you now, but there are places where highly detailed mapping is being done, and mapping this way will make it harder for future editors. Thanks
userJeff (2017-09-01 04:25:53+00:00): This discussion continued at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59565
userJeff (2017-08-14 20:45:45+00:00): Park boundaries approximate based on maps at minneapolisparks.org
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-09-13 23:09:28+00:00): This way is strange: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&node=51761599#map=19/-4.20728/-69.94290
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-09-13 23:09:55+00:00): Also this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/515659272
andi9876 (2017-09-06 02:06:26+00:00): Dear, you used old satellite images. Reverted already.
andi9876 (2017-09-08 16:08:57+00:00): Veal Renh roundabout is working in progress.
Plan: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7Fwb6PHLH-JMmJFaGRUQzRPWlE/view?usp=sharing
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:35:24+00:00): Olá, Eduscott.
Nesta sua edição você criou 4 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
marcioaguiar (2017-08-22 11:51:21+00:00): Opa, Edu! Estou vendo que você está fazendo vários realinhamentos. Peço que tenha cuidado, porque muitas imagens de sattélite estão desalinhadas, então é sempre bom verificar mais de uma camada (como Bing e Mapbox) e idealmente utilizar alguma camada de GPS (pode ser sua, do openstreetmap ou strava).

Abraços.
escada (2017-10-28 06:00:51+00:00): Hallo jplannoy,

pourquoi avez vous changer landuse=forest par highway=pedestrian ?

escada
jplannoy (2017-11-02 22:04:44+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai dû faire une fausse manœuvre.
Merci de l'avoir remarqué.
jplannoy
Hjart (2017-08-15 20:36:26+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Bemærk dog at de to kirker du markerede, i forvejen var markeret på deres respektive bygninger og at jeg derfor har slettet din version af dem
CasperA (2017-08-16 06:31:33+00:00): Hej Hjart, tak for lektionen, det er modtaget.

Jeg så at der var tomme adressepunkter, ud over bygningsmarkeringerne, og troede at adressepunktet også skulle være udfyldt...
Hjart (2017-08-16 17:34:58+00:00): Vi rører generelt ikke ved de adresser vi importerer fra det officielle adresseregister. Det kan godt virke som om det ikke er helt optimalt, men det er sådan en regel vi indtil videre har.
alies' (2018-05-14 15:30:00+00:00): Почему вы отметили ПТК не как промышленную зону, а как здание?
Hopla57 (2017-08-29 19:29:47+00:00): Bonjour,

Pour votre information, il ne faut pas mettre le nom des médecins : en effet, c'est assimilé à de la publicité et les médecins n'ont pas le droit d'en faire. Comme OSM n'est pas un annuaire, on ne peut donc pas mettre les noms.

Cordialement.
przemas75 (2018-06-04 08:43:21+00:00): Zmieniłeś drogę Bukową na track, ale z nawierzchnią jako 'sett', a to już utwardzona.
Jeśli to droga polna, to należy usunąć ten surface. Może przypomnisz sobie jaka tam nawierzchnia jest?
lukaszsitar (2018-06-04 22:19:13+00:00): Poprawiłem częśc w obszarze zabudowanym.  Tam jest asfalt więc zmieniłem na drogę unclassified.

W dalszej części jest to droga polna częścowo z piachu, częściowo utwardzona na szer 2m kamieniami polnymi (kocie łby). Ustawieni drogi polnej moim zdaniem jest tu na miejscu gdyż przeważa taki typ tej drogi. W przypadku roweżystów natomiast ma ogromne znaczenie że częściowo jest utwardzona kamieniami co znacznie utrudnia jazdę w stosunku do drogi polnej.
przemas75 (2018-06-05 11:57:05+00:00): kocie łby to raczej cobblestone, sett to taka kostka granitowa, po której jakoś da się jechać (choć wiadomo, po asfalcie lepiej).
Może miałeś na myśli żwir albo coś w tym stylu (gravel).
Po nawierzchni 'sett' jak najbardziej auto wygodnie przejedzie.
Filip009 (2022-04-13 08:34:33+00:00): Dobrý deň, fakt sa tento prameň https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4253022711 volá vyvieračka?
Mirecnet (2022-04-13 09:28:24+00:00): Nie, je to velka vyvieracka - velky vyber potoka, pri ktorom je aj meteo meracia stanica prietoku. Dodnes sa mi vsak nepodarilo zistit, ako sa ten vyver oficialne vola. Na ziadnej inej mape nie je.Nechcem si vymyslat. Mozno Vyver v Jastrabej. Zistim a zmenim to...
Mirecnet (2022-04-13 09:42:59+00:00): Myslel som povodne, ze niekto doplni nazov takejto vyznamnej vyvieracky. Presli vsak roky a ak v tej mape nieco nezmenim ja, tak to ma kazdy na haku... Rozhodil som siete a zistuje sa.
Filip009 (2022-04-13 10:13:08+00:00): Keby bola bez mena, tak by mi to nevadilo. Lenže keď má v tagu name "vyvieračka" tak mi to vadí preto, pretože to, že je to prameň vyjadruje tag natural=spring. Z mena to pochopí len Slovák. Z toho tagu to pochopí aj Číňan, Ind, Američan ... Čiže mi to meno "vyvieračka" príde úplne zbytočné.
Mirecnet (2022-04-13 18:44:11+00:00): Zistuje sa...
MKnight (2017-08-15 09:29:40+00:00): Ich habe den Maria Pawlowna vom Weg wieder entfernt, da er bereits in der zugehörigen Relation enthalten ist.
naoliv (2017-12-07 04:33:57+00:00): Olá, Eduscott.
Nesta sua edição você criou 2 proibições de retorno onde a origem e o destino são iguais (ou seja, você falou que é proibido fazer um retorno na própria rua). Com algumas poucas exceções, criar este tipo de proibição de retorno na própria rua não é correto e nem necessário. Evite criar este tipo de proibição. Em caso de dúvida, entre em contato com a comunidade através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
Dakobra (2017-08-14 21:59:18+00:00): Change shoulda been, Road doesn't exist.
bye12 (2017-08-14 22:15:20+00:00): Changeset edits were all near Team Disney Anaheim Building
Allroads (2017-08-14 22:48:04+00:00): Hoi Xanny, het het kan nog strakker.
Na rechtleggen liggen delen toch niet in het midden, dat kan je niet op basis van de luchtfoto alleen, je ziet namelijk niet het verschil tussen stoep en rijbaan.
Hiervoor heb je de wmts laag BGT omtrekgericht nodig. Dan pas kan je het goed uitlijnen.
En verschil maken tussen haakse en ronde hoeken, het verspringen van de rijbaan chicanes etc.

Succes.
joost schouppe (2018-08-16 10:54:05+00:00): Votre sentier termine sur le vieux train vicinal. Est ce que la partie qui connecte vers le N40 est encore praticable a pied/a vélo? Maitenant, personne peut l'ultiliser. Puet-etre le train vecinal se peut suivre jusqu'a cette sentier la?: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146987521
WojtekK (2017-08-16 13:53:43+00:00): Please change tagging 'allotments' to 'famland' ..is more suitable for this kind of landcover
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2019-04-14 19:42:33+00:00): if you like, please join the discussion.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=745521
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 14:32:17+00:00): no hay castillo aquí.
omgitsgela (2019-02-11 02:23:45+00:00): When you're adding opening_hours values, please make sure you're using the standard format as described in the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Specifically, you're leaving out the colons, and you're using commas for separators when semicolons are standard OSM for multiple values in a field. As an example:

Mo 10:00-12:00,12:30-15:00; Tu-Fr 08:00-12:00,12:30-15:00; Sa 08:00-12:00

These issues came up in a JOSM validation search. I'm fixing them manually.
Your Village Maps (2019-02-11 22:46:28+00:00): Thanks for the "heads up".  I must have picked up this bad habit from others' work rather than studying the information in the Wiki.  I will use ; instead of , now between days/sets of days.
BCNorwich (2017-08-22 07:12:38+00:00): changed area=yes to building=yes
BCNorwich (2017-08-22 07:12:57+00:00): changed area=yes to building=yes
BCNorwich (2017-08-22 07:13:20+00:00): changed area=yes to building=yes
BCNorwich (2017-08-22 07:13:52+00:00): changed area=yes to building=yes
BCNorwich (2017-08-22 07:14:10+00:00): changed area=yes to building=yes
Warin61 (2017-08-15 23:30:18+00:00): It is WRONG.

The admin  boundary comes the NSW Government LPI. If you want to change the coast line then change that .. not the admin boundary!!!!
tracker5 (2017-08-15 23:39:12+00:00): I looked up the "OSM Example" for Harbors -  http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=16/53.3889/-6.0644 Howth port and it comes with the administrative boundary attached to the coastline.

Do you want me to change it back?
tracker5 (2017-08-15 23:52:30+00:00): @Warin61 I fixed the boundary. Sorry for the problem
Warin61 (2017-08-16 00:00:16+00:00): Thanks
The Admin boundary would be correct. It could be the high tide mark .. in a certain year? Would have to read the legal papers to see. I am against having the admin boundaries use physical features - leads to this kind of problem. 

Where the coast line is ... could well be different from the admin boundary, low tide mark? mid tide mark?
tracker5 (2017-08-16 00:43:35+00:00): Here's the local government area map - http://www.coffsharbour.nsw.gov.au/coffs-and-council/running-council/PublishingImages/Coffs_LGA_Localities-Map1.jpg

If you zoom in you can see coffs harbour and it goes north from the breakwater - not following the coastline.
aharvey (2017-08-29 12:13:00+00:00): I think we need to have a bit more of a discussion on this. If people want the LPI Admin Boundaries they can go to LPI and get it. The LPI boundaries aren't the official legal definition of these boundaries, they are just the LPIs representation.

I think we should do what makes sense for OSM and not necessarily just copy LPI.

I thought quite often admin boundaries are defined in reference to a road, coastline or river. In those cases I do think that the admin boundary relation should use the road, coastline or river way as part of it, if that's it's definition.
Warin61 (2017-08-29 23:31:27+00:00): Coastlines and rivers change over time. And so too do some roads. I'd think a legal boundary that uses a feature will specify a date? Or maybe the date is taken from when the document was made? 
By separating an admin boundary from other things in OSM it allows these other things to be altered by mappers without effecting the admin boundaries. People do tweak things - particularly rivers, roads and coastlines to match what they think it should be. If the admin boundary is attached then that may be moved inappropriately. 

As for the LPI .. I'd refer to http://www.lpi.nsw.gov.au/land_titles I think these are as close to the legal definition that OSM will get.
BCNorwich (2017-08-22 07:14:43+00:00): changed area=yes to building=yes
BCNorwich (2017-08-15 05:32:15+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yes
Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2017-08-15 05:33:33+00:00): Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yes
BCNorwich (2017-08-15 05:34:55+00:00): Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yes
oormilavinod (2017-08-16 05:50:30+00:00): hey KillJoyAlpha, welcome to OSM. i appreciate your interest in mapping. I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
BCNorwich (2017-08-15 05:48:24+00:00): Squared up outline, changed area=yes to building=yes
colgza (2017-08-15 02:15:43+00:00): I meant to say "Added School".
Supaplex (2017-10-01 17:51:33+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
红旗渠 (2017-12-05 19:32:47+00:00): Hi Leon,

have you really used Bing as source? On Bing these roads are not visible yet.

Greetings
nevw (2017-12-06 11:32:35+00:00): DigitalGlobe Standard Imagery is more recent than Bing in this area.
红旗渠 (2017-12-06 15:50:22+00:00): I know this, I've used DigitalGlobe to map the [Tesla Battery](http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544861272)
Glassman (2017-08-15 05:28:42+00:00): OSM is for features that can be verified. Please do not vandalize.