piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Minh Nguyen (2019-04-24 22:30:06+00:00): That tagging style was also discussed elsewhere at the time, for instance on talk-us: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/josm-dev/2013-November/006781.html .

I understand the downside you’re describing, but as it happens that page has been pretty influential, as seen in https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/relations/route#roles . Though this tagging style isn’t universal among U.S. mappers, it’s clearly more widespread than an individual change by Kristen, so we should discuss it more widely as a community. Maybe we’ll finally come to a consensus about it.
Minh Nguyen (2019-04-24 22:30:56+00:00): (A consensus one way or another, that is.)
Warin61 (2018-10-11 00:51:12+00:00): Hi,
On Way: 246876954 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
LWK (2016-02-02 23:39:03+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
eteb3 (2019-10-14 11:29:22+00:00): Hi Phillip,
I'm surveying Sutton (Peterborough)  at the moment in dribs and drabs. 

I've put a note where your possible pipeline crosses a road junction: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1908408

Are there things to look out for on the ground if I'm to confirm that your water pipeline runs that way?
Thanks
philipcullen (2019-10-14 18:44:18+00:00): Hi,

Water pipelines tend to have the least visible infrastructure, and don't have something at every crossing, but things to look out for would be manholes and their concrete surrounds at the side of the road (or in a nearby field). There may be short concrete marker posts, which will indicate the details of the pipe, but they tend to only be around manholes and not at each road crossing.

Phil
Britzz (2020-01-25 18:05:05+00:00): La qualité de cet import me semble de très mauvaise qualité, pas un seul POI qui correspond à une place sur BDOrtho à proximité
c3kkos (2020-01-29 06:25:34+00:00): via di Fabbriano has wrong name.
it has to change to its real name, via di Tabbiano
LWK (2016-02-02 23:39:01+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-11-15 12:06:59+00:00): Hi, you added a lot of areas in this edit without any tags, you just had the default area=yes tag, which doesn't really change anything. I've removed most of them in this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53801299 ).

We don't *really* map fields in OSM. You can always map the walls/hedges if you'd like.
aseerel4c26 (2014-11-18 01:08:06+00:00): Hamed, please do not save test edits.

Thank you!
Robert Whittaker (2021-11-11 18:07:50+00:00): This was a while ago, but an odd tag "addr:vector=opposite" appears to be been added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43303737/history in this changeset. There's only one other instance of this key worldwide, so I was wondering what it's purpose is, and if the information would be better represented some other way...
SK53 (2021-11-11 19:05:01+00:00): Experimental. The vector represents which way housenumbers go w.r.t to the street way, so opposite means that house numbers rise in the opposite direction to the direction of the way. The idea is that one can start to infer predicted housenumbers based on the vector direction. I stopped thinking about this in detail when openaddresses kicked off as John Murray had more sophisticated techniques. Of course when it died, I'd lost the impetus.

Not sure why I added it here (perhaps based on FHRS address values).
SK53 (2021-11-11 19:06:06+00:00): I guess in principle it is equivalent to addr:interpolation ways on either side of the road.
Владимир К (2017-04-04 07:42:19+00:00): здесь наверно высота самой вышки имелась ввиду, а не над уровнем моря? перенесу в height
LWK (2016-02-02 23:38:58+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
maning (2015-12-29 04:10:04+00:00): what does "addedfield#uniHD" mean in the name of these polys?  Also, these are not meadows but farmlands either of grains or sugarcane.
hsimpson (2016-10-11 00:17:21+00:00): Hi Steve, dieser Änderungssatz ist zwar schon etwas älter, ich bin trotzdem wegen der untypischen Klassifizierung der Altenburger Straße hierauf aufmerksam geworden. Die Problematik habe ich in dieser Note erläutert, es wäre super, wenn du dir das mal anschaust: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/744232
Vielen Dank und viele Grüße,
hsimpson
dpolovinkin (2023-08-24 08:42:00+00:00): hi, there is very messy and incorrect geometry of the many buildings added from Bing, there were no review of them before adding to a map?
LWK (2016-02-02 23:38:54+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:56:18+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247361965
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:26:56+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54508514
adiatmad (2020-12-23 02:29:32+00:00): Halo gerantung, 
Semoga Anda sehat selalu.

Anda menambahkan tag admin_level=99 di sini (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/247381630)
Berdasarkan Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative) tag admin_level mayoritas digabung dengan tag boundary_administrative (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary=administrative#combinations).

Apakah admin_level=99 itu kesalahan penulisan atau ada arti tertentu?

Terima kasih.

---

Hello gerantung, 
Hope you are doing well.

You added the tag admin_level = 99 here (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/247381630)
Based on the Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative) the majority of the admin_level tags are combined with the boundary_administrative tag (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary=administrative#combinations).

Is admin_level = 99 a typo or does it mean something?

Best regards.
MKnight (2016-03-25 11:09:33+00:00): Was hats denn mit der Linie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75594571 auf sich?
Gehrke (2016-03-25 11:44:01+00:00): kannich nicht sagen. Die kommt wohl aus 2010 und war früher mal eine PLZ-Grenze (bis die Post den Zuschnitt geändert hat).
Aber ich vermute stark, dass es auch eine Ortsteilgrenze ist und habe sie daher nicht gelsöcht.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-18 01:24:46+00:00): Added "natural=tree_row" to ways such as  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247452825/history
tuxayo (2016-01-14 22:51:43+00:00): Hay que poner al menos foot=yes a las ciclovías si hay espacio para los peatones. Porque implícitamente, highway=cycleway prohíbe a ellos.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Spain

Mas detalles:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:segregated

Deben quedar muchas ciclovias que corregir.
Irma IRM-ED (2021-05-07 00:35:20+00:00):  Hello Johnny Carlsen, 
Your digitation is good, but you can add a tag:layer=-1, and tunnel=yes
for waterway=dam
please check 18.4325951, 99.4985309
Thanks
*Martin* (2023-06-02 07:39:59+00:00): Postal codes are wron in this changesed. I've removed them in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/136856083.

Also there is no key `postcode` documented in wiki. Use `postal_code` on street or relation or `addr:postcode` on building or node.
SomeoneElse (2024-06-28 16:22:41+00:00): Hello,
I know that this was ages ago, but I wonder if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203151909 is the same feature as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247737318 ?
(I'm mentioning this at both changesets - I have no familiarity with this area at all; a DWG correspondent thought that the path of the Tame here was wrong)
Landou (2016-09-11 09:02:18+00:00): The belgian mailing list recommended me to make a comment on this change set:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-be/2016-September/009024.html

Do you know why the modification for http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/502959018 resulted in the tag name not following the belgian conventions?
LWK (2016-02-02 23:38:51+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
Hjart (2014-12-29 17:19:41+00:00): Hvad har du tegnet efter her?
Geofreund1 (2020-08-29 16:19:28+00:00): Hallo Nakaner,
auf unserem heutigen Ausflug nach Zerbst/Anhalt bin ich versehentlich von Westen kommend in die Klappgasse abgebogen und wollte - mit OSM Navi - auch wieder aus der Klappgasse nach Westen zurück. Dort ist aber das Linksabbiegen mit durchgezogener Linie verboten. Leider verwendet auch die Lutherwegrelation die Verbindung zwischen beiden Fahrbahnen der Breite Straße. Daher möchte ich dich bitten, dir die Sache mal anzuschauen und - wenn möglich - zu korrigieren.
Danke
Gruß
Geofreund1
Nakaner (2020-08-29 18:09:06+00:00): Hallo Geofreund1,

ich glaube, dass ich die Breite Straße damals ggf. in zwei Ways aufgeteilt habe und hier wohl einen Way zu viel eingetragen habe. Wenn du da eine durchgezogene Linie gesehen hast, kannst du den kleinen Way zwischen den beiden Richtungsfahrbahnen der Breiten Straße gerne löschen.

Ich bin dort bislang nur viermal durchgefahren, zweimal mit dem Bus und zweimal mit dem Auto (davon einmal als Fahrer). Das ist viele Jahre her.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Geofreund1 (2020-08-29 18:53:07+00:00): Das Problem ist nicht so sehr das Löschen des falschen Verbindungsweges, sondern der Lutherweg, der durch das Löschen unterbrochen würde. Ich weiß leider nicht, wie der realiter verläuft.
Morten Lange (2021-01-07 20:08:57+00:00): stien 247886179 ser ut til å følge bekkedrag og krysser Tanggeelva akkurat der en bekk ser ut til å renne ut i den.... (Jeg har brukt DTM-kart basert på høydeskanning med laser. DTM-kartet finnes i editoren ID )
fkv (2021-03-26 22:33:41+00:00): Gute Arbeit. Warum machst du nicht weiter? Ist die Anzahl (4000) deiner Edits so eine schöne Zahl, dass du sie nicht mehr verändern willst?
Nakaner (2015-05-25 09:15:47+00:00): Ist es nicht selbstverständlich, dass man einen Prellbock mit railway:pzb=no taggt? Ich kann mir schwer vorstellen, wie auf dem Prellbock noch ein PZB-Magnet steht. Wenn man da drauffährt, ist es schon zu spät. :)

Gefunden an den Prellböcken im Bahnhof Gerstetten.
CloCkWeRX (2016-05-29 12:28:16+00:00): I'm guessing from strava user reports this (w247960495) is now built?
GerdP (2015-11-13 16:17:00+00:00): please review:
I've changed way=residential 
to 
highway=service
service=driveway
Alexander-II (2017-10-17 10:57:58+00:00): Привет. А что находится вот здесь https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247830414 ? Что это за курятник такой?
KooLru (2017-10-17 23:30:31+00:00): В парке вокруг бывшей голубятни настроено сараев с курами и утками.
На мапиллари постараюсь закинуть фотоснимков.
Alexander-II (2017-10-18 17:13:58+00:00): Они там что-то типа мини-зоопарка? Или как ферма, где их разводят?
Спасибо за ответ :)
mariotomo (2020-02-12 22:59:53+00:00): hi.  do you still remember about this Hinzufügen von Details, which source you used?  it's definitely not just GPS traces, it looks much more like an import from some database.  same question would go for your subsequent 4 changesets, all in the same area, all with fields like CAT_CALLE, ESTADO, FECHA, etc.
Warin61 (2018-10-11 01:12:26+00:00): Hi,
On Way: 248048284 you have tagged landuse=scrub.
I have not changed it, but I think it should be tagged natural=scrub.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dscrub
Essex_Boy (2018-10-11 18:07:56+00:00): Cheers for that. My mistake. I've now changed it to natural=scrub.
Geofreund1 (2020-07-21 14:38:27+00:00): Hallo Nakaner,
da wir demnächst in Dessau Urlaub machen, schaue ich mir derzeit die ganzen Fehler in der Gegend näher an.
Die Fußwege im Gebäude Bitterfelder Straße 54 sehen ziemlich seltsam aus. Könntest du dir das mal anschauen?
Danke
Geofreund1
Nakaner (2020-07-21 15:18:28+00:00): Hallo,

der ursächliche Änderungssatz ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87032458 Ich habe den Fehler trotzdem behoben (war zu kaputt, um es stehen zu lassen).

Viele Grüße

Michael
Geofreund1 (2020-07-21 16:33:36+00:00): Du bist ja schneller als der Schall.
Danke
eggie (2018-01-29 14:49:40+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen, daarom stuur ik je een uitgebreid (Alsnog) welkomstbericht met tips en links.
dforsi (2018-09-04 16:26:38+00:00): Hello, 5 years ago :-) you added https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2549480362 with amenity=sping, did you mean natural=spring?
woodpeck (2023-07-13 13:18:07+00:00): Hallo Steingesicht, die Betreiber der "Wilden Ranch" in der Unteren Rauhmühle haben geschrieben, dass der von Dir eingetragene Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33025309 ein Privatweg sei und nicht zur allgemeinen Nutzung. Ich habe das in OSM entsprechend angepasst; solltest Du aber anderslautende Infos haben, kannst Du das gerne wieder zurück ändern.
Basstoelpel (2020-10-25 15:58:08+00:00): Mechanischer edit, großteils falsch: ungefähr die Hälfte der Marker hat keinen Konus.
LWK (2016-02-02 23:38:48+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
LWK (2016-02-02 23:38:44+00:00): NOTA: da correggere utilizzando i dati contenuti nei fascicoli circolazione linee (https://normativaesercizio.rfi.it).

NON USARE l'allegato al Prospetto Informativo Rete (PIR) per risalire ai valori di maxspeed.
zstadler (2017-12-12 15:59:35+00:00): Hello Ilya Kogan,

In this edit you have changed
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223593621/history
from "footway" to "bridleway".
.
Is this "A way intended for use by horse riders"?
.
Please also check other nearby ways you tagged as highway=bridleway:
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/223593621/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247105458/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247105462/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247848892/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247848896/history
zstadler (2021-07-11 22:09:59+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58827040
Firefishy (2015-11-08 00:12:39+00:00): Hi, Do you have any more info about the opening of this rail section? Who is RTG?
SomeoneElse (2023-12-20 18:19:39+00:00): Hello,

I hope you don't mind me asking about an edit from 10(!) years ago.  On this changeset you added a "source=Google" tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248314290 (and also on a couple of other changes too). We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here - it would cause real problems for the project if we were found to be using Google Maps as a source.
If this is somewhere that you are familiar with, then "source=local_knowledge" would be perfectly OK.

Best Regards
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
Dino Michelini (2016-10-02 11:49:19+00:00): Ciao ho notato che hai usato il termine di codula per alcuni torrenti stagionali intermittenti carsici ma mi risulta che quando si parla di codula si intende una valle (depressione o gola) fluviale carsica (alveo o letto) del torrente che nel Supramonte spesso è molto scavata dall'acqua simile ad un canyon. Inoltre sei sicuro che Cadula s'Ozzastru, Riu Unchinos siano corretti? In altre fonti gli alvei dei torrenti carsici risultano rispettivamente indicati come Codula Lada e Codula S'Ozzastru. Poichè la codula è una caratteristica del paesaggio disegno un multi-poligono dell'area interessata ed utilizzo i tag natural=shingle e name= Codula *. Inoltre se nella codula scorre l'acqua stagionalmente e/o intermittente disegno il corso del torrente ed utilizzo i tag waterway=stream, name=*, ntermittent=yes, Seasonal=yes.
sbiribizio (2016-10-02 16:19:55+00:00): Questo è un vecchissimo changeset che risale al l'alluvione in Sardegna di 3 anni fa. I dati erano della regione Sardegna.
Sicuramente conosci il territorio meglio di me, fai  pure le modifiche necessarie.
frosm (2018-10-07 23:20:07+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248351562
qu'avez-vous voulu représenter à cet endroit ? l'imagerie qui n'a pas été maj entre temps ne donne pas l'impression que c'est une "zone chemin"
salutations,
Marc
Marc Mongenet (2018-10-08 22:17:08+00:00): Bonjour, l'imagerie a été mise à jour entre temps. On voit sur l'imagerie de 2011 qu'il s'agissait d'une piste en terre (highway=track, tracktype=grade2) élargie au point d'être une aire (area=yes). Aujourd'hui c'est rétréci.
pnorman (2015-03-09 20:14:25+00:00): I was wondering, is this office really off of the parking lot at the end of Helmcken Street?
eggie (2018-02-22 23:11:23+00:00): Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:56:52+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235878763/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
Владимир К (2016-03-15 12:31:32+00:00): что значит название на этой парковке? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111650822/history и почему оно большими буквами?
Flurps (2019-05-19 21:56:28+00:00): Hey there, these internal mapping things don't seem to render correctly on Mapnik and ... I'm not exactly sure what to do about it. Not sure if you'll get this message, so leaving a note on the building too.
RoterEmil (2017-02-25 15:20:06+00:00): Hallo Jedrzej, in diesem CS (vielleicht auch in weiteren?) hast Du als Quelle für einige "artworks" "source=Skulpturen an der TU Kaiserslautern, ISBN 978-3-9414" angegeben. Ist das rechtlich gesehen eine OSM-konforme Quelle? Danke für aufklärende Nachricht und happy mapping :)

PS: Im OSM-Forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=57468) hatte ich zunächst in der Sache nachgefragt, obwohl ich Dich natürlich zuerst besser auf diesem Wege direkt hätte anschreiben sollen. Dafür: Pardon!
cayetanobv (2015-04-10 14:41:30+00:00): Calle de Ali-Al Gomarí
Dakon (2015-05-26 18:06:40+00:00): Warum hast du bei diversen Orten village in suburb geändert? So wie ich das Wiki lese, sollte man das nur bei ineinander übergehender Bebauung (also z.B. Basche-Kirchdorf-Egestorf) verwenden, aber nicht bei tatsächlich abgegrenzten Dörfern.
Pink Duck (2020-09-06 08:17:37+00:00): I've corrected a typo in store name introduced by this edit all those years ago. It was “Infnity Motorcycles”, now ‘Infinity Motorcycles’.
Imperator Lrrr (2017-04-04 11:41:47+00:00): W tym zestawie zmian znajduje się węzeł nr 2554435915 który nie ma żadnego tagu. To śmieć czy do czegoś służy?
Josef73 (2019-01-01 14:42:09+00:00): Hello, What means sesonal? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/146288
Warin61 (2017-02-27 03:08:53+00:00): You have a number of nodes at the ends of tracks with tower=power source=bing ... 
I cannot see anything there .. not even with the better LPI Imagery. deleted these as I came across them. e.g. Node: 2555269081
stevage (2017-02-27 03:18:10+00:00): Weird - thanks for letting me know. If they're not connected to a power=line it was almost certainly a mistake - can't really imagine how that happened.
Warin61 (2017-02-27 03:46:09+00:00): I had a look for power lines ... they are very hard to see on imagery .. none in OSM itself. The LPI Imagery shows some of that area clear of trees .. and even then I cannot see them... Don't know how .. they don't stand out with the standard rendering so would be easy to miss that way. I only notice them when I am editing the roads.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-09-21 19:32:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62808352 where the changeset comment is: Removing some 5-year old SEO spam
redd (2023-04-07 18:04:15+00:00): Hi benito01,
after 9 years you still seem to active on OSM. Thanks for you contributions.

Maybe you can check again what you meant with private=yez on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248801756.

Nowadays we probably would tag this as access=private.

thanks,
redd
osmfix_2013 (2015-10-05 22:39:42+00:00): Your changeset contains wrong turn restriction(s).
Fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34458162
osmfix_2013 (2015-10-05 22:36:48+00:00): Your changeset contains wrong turn restriction(s).
Fixed:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34458240
GerdP (2015-10-26 16:09:49+00:00): please review:
I've changed a few ways with the tag
highway=turning_loop .
This tag is meant for nodes only.
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34885421
marc__marc (2021-02-23 21:03:05+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248950013
vous avez dessiné une piste de 18m de large avec un tag disant qu'elle fait 20m.
ne trouvant pas d'info sur la taille de la piste sur le site que vous avez renseigné, pourriez-vous vérifier ce qu'il en est ?
Cordialement,
Marc
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-09-21 19:32:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62808352 where the changeset comment is: Removing some 5-year old SEO spam
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-05-18 09:34:15+00:00): Hi. I'm not sure what the little area here is ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248976665 ), but I've removed it because it didn't make much sense
VictorIE (2022-12-07 10:00:38+00:00): Hi 

Is there a foot connection here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2351574660#map=19/52.28323/-9.66446
MacLondon (2022-12-15 00:02:54+00:00): Hi. There isn't any formal connection connection here, presumably deliberate as it would have been an obvious thing to do when (or after) the (now dead-end) old main road got bypassed.

It is possible to climb a grass bank (up + then back down) to get from the old road to the higher level newer road, but I would consider this to be too much of a barrier to less agile people to merit mapping with a routable path.
VictorIE (2022-12-15 09:25:14+00:00): Changed to noexit=yes
Constable (2017-10-16 21:14:15+00:00): Ciao, tanti edifici modificati con questo changeset mancano del tag che specifica che tipo di negozio siano, non basta inserire building=industrial (che tra l'altro non è neanche del tutto corretto, sarebbe meglio building=retail per gli edifici che ospitano negozi), serve inserire il tag shop=* dove car equivale a concessionaria, clothes negozio di vestiti, jewelry gioielli, furniture mobili, shoes scarpe, e così via
Qua trovi la lista completa
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop#Shop_specific_Information
Alcuni posso aggiornali anche io perché sono negozi di grandi catene commerciali, altri non ho idea di cosa siano (Giotta e Mallero Balgera per citarne due)
Grazie per la collaborazione!
Ciao
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-09-21 19:32:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62808352 where the changeset comment is: Removing some 5-year old SEO spam
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-09-21 19:32:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 62808352 where the changeset comment is: Removing some 5-year old SEO spam
Constable (2017-04-21 09:58:28+00:00): ciao, scrivo a te visto che sei stato l'ultimo a modificare la ciclabile di cui si parla in questa nota http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/968726
Se conosci la zona puoi per favore dare un'occhiata e nel caso correggere? grazie
SomeoneElse (2016-11-04 19:33:13+00:00): Hello,
Just checking that your hotel is the big building at the corner - currently http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2556790717/history is between the building and the road.  I'm sure that guests don't have to curl up on the pavement along Gloucester Terrace :)
Cheers,
Andy