piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Chicxulub Kukulkan (2021-08-25 20:57:54+00:00): Le agradezco sus comentarios :) .

Durante mis primeras intervenciones en OpenStreetMap utilicé la etiqueta "name=FES Iztacala, UNAM". Conforme fui conociendo las reglas de OSM y el uso de las etiquetas, consideré que "Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México" debía colocarlo como "operator=*" para todo aquél plantel fuera de Ciudad Universitaria. Mi intención es que se pueda ver la cobertura de la "Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México" en OpenStreetMap Taginfo.

Más tarde le explico que es lo que propongo para el campus principal del Instituto Politécnico Nacional.

Que tenga un buen día.
CENTSOARER (2021-08-27 17:19:06+00:00): He estado en esta situación también, pero concluí que hay instituciones que no tienen un campus principal e incluso hacen un esfuerzo para que no parezca así. La UNAM es una universidad con presencia nacional (internacional, de hecho) y por más importante que CU sea, sigue siendo un elemento de la entidad más importante que es la Universidad, que existe antes de CU. Pienso que independientemente de lo que se pueda acordar, operator debe ir.

Considera por ejemplo el caso de la Universidad de Texas (University of Texas), si buscas en OSM "University of Texas at" encontrarás los distintos campus de la Universidad etiquetados en el nombre como "University of Texas at Austin" y "University of Texas at Arlington", etc.
ash_win (2021-04-12 12:20:04+00:00): Hi MM155620,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping on residential roads.Kindly check with way 840756203
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102803317
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102665718
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 23:52:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108549522 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some allegedly google-source changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105322114
Keima (2021-04-09 19:50:48+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue de nouveau dans le projet OpenStreetMap (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue)

Vous avez ajouté une adresse sur un bâtiment (44 Rue des Lices), or l'adressage existe déjà (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2853059340), une relation associatedStreet est utilisé dans cette rue, cela fait donc doublon.

Cordialement,
Keima (2021-04-15 15:32:53+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai fait la correction dans le groupe de modification 103004364.
Cordialement,
Lostmonkey (2022-01-25 13:57:42+00:00): Har fjernet den optegning, som gjorde Himmelbjergruten til en sammenhængende rundtur omkring søerne. Det er ikke den officielle rute. Ifølge skiltning og officielle foldere går ruten fra Ry station nord om søerne til Silkeborg og tilbage syd om søerne med slut ved Himmelbjerget. Den indtegnede, ukorrekte ruteføring mellem Himmelbjerget og Ry inkluderede en del af Århus-Silkeborg-ruten plus ikke-skiltet ruteføring.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 09:56:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103525696, 103527306 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
eggie (2021-04-09 19:55:26+00:00): Dag Jan.. Probeer als het even kan op de adresnode bij te taggen
MVG
eggie
Henk de Jong 01 (2021-04-10 19:14:35+00:00): Hallo Eggie, bedankt voor je vriendelijke woorden in een wereld die voor mij nieuw is. Ik ben redelijk bekend in Den Bosch, en ik zal mij met betrekking tot mijn opmerkingern dan ook op deze mooie stad richten.
Ik heb het adres van Jan Mees Tabak inmiddels aangepast, evenals de website van hen. Ik hoop dat ik dat goed gedaan heb, anders hoor ik dat wel.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Henk de Jong
eggie (2021-04-10 20:02:22+00:00): Je goed bedoelde wijziging heb ik samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode. Die schuif ik dan gewoon naar elkaar en druk op M in mijn editor josm.
Volgens mij in editor iD plakt het van zelf.
Mocht je willen doorzetten kijk dan eens naar de beter editor JOSM.
Veel meer overzicht.
 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 Mapse
eggie
Bulls_eye (2021-08-26 19:51:41+00:00): Hi parsd51, does the gate https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8613155760 still exist? I can’t confirm it in this Mapillary image (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=2776876242436801&lat=55.7292466&lng=12.4437756&z=17&focus=photo&x=0.6618972050765749&y=0.5354401870717944&zoom=0). Since the links to the hospital appear to be open per Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=542974753729984), I wanted to remove the access=no tags which block routing.

Thanks!
Bulls_eye
osmviborg (2021-08-27 07:16:29+00:00): According to this map, all roads are open: 
https://www.herlevhospital.dk/Documents/20577_Oversigtskort_Herlev_maj2021_16.06.2021_PRINT.pdf
parsd51 (2021-08-27 09:09:38+00:00): Hi Bulls_eye

Cool observations!

I haven’t been around there since I made the changes.

From the Mapillary link you mention it looks two-way open to me - no gate, there are arrows on the road to the multi-story parking. Also from the next Mapillary picture a car is turning left. The signs also “says” it is open. From a logical, local knowledge perspective it wouldn’t make sense to me to open the highway links for an appendix, likely causing a lot of U-turns. So to me it seems all open :-)

Regards
parsd51
Bulls_eye (2021-08-30 19:41:23+00:00): Thanks for the information, osmviborg and parsd51! I will proceed with removing the gate as well as the access=no tags on the links.
geoaria (2021-04-14 17:34:50+00:00): در اینجا (32.68787/51.53037) سعی کرده اید یک میدان جدید ایجاد کنید که متاسفانه به علت عدم تسلط روی ویرایش نقشه باعث چندین خطا شده اید. جهت مسیر ها یک طرفه را اشتباه گذاشته اید. این اگر میدان است به صئرت ترسیم جداگانه باشد.خطا اصلاح شد. حتما با مطالعه بیشتر ویرایش کنید.

duplicated_edges
eggie (2021-04-09 19:58:08+00:00): Dag Jan  Bij Levis Jeroen Boschhuis heb je shop=shoes verwijderd. Het zal dan niet renderen op de kaart.


https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102667771

Wat is de naam van de bar? 

M VG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-09 20:13:12+00:00): http://www.invito.com/  staat nog steeds als website vermeld..
Die regel kun je verwijderen, maar de shoptag moet er denk wel weer bij.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-04-09 20:16:34+00:00): website verwijderd...  shop=clothes toegevoegd.. Zou dat phone=  niet zijn veranderd?
Henk de Jong 01 (2021-04-10 19:25:04+00:00): Invito is verhuisd naar Hooge Steenweg. Staat daar al vermeld.
eggie (2021-04-09 20:08:18+00:00): Hier wat tips hoe je zoiets kan taggen, mar het was al geen adresnode .. dus de hele node mag weg.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dvacant

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-09 20:47:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback..Probeer direct bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode.. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-09 20:50:52+00:00): Voor zever bekend is dit een familiewoning en geen bar. Graag reactie.

MVG
eggie
Omnific (2021-04-12 20:20:45+00:00): I am reverting this changeset, as the trail was properly tagged with access=no. Please reach out if you have questions.
Brandonpdavis (2021-04-12 22:16:49+00:00): I don’t feel that keeping the trail visible will benefit our efforts. More and individuals are finding and posting its location. We are having another discussion with county commissioners and DNR reps. Having the trail posted reduces our ability to control the narrative. I still request that it is removed until we get an agreement with authorities.
Omnific (2021-04-12 23:09:54+00:00): Unfortunately, controlling the narrative is not the purpose of OSM. OSM relies on a principle called ground truth. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth for more details. Essentially, the tag should prevent people from using it. The responsibility of accurately interpreting the tag for no access falls on the third party that uses OSM data. Instead of modifying correct OSM data, you should reach out to the apps that are using OSM data.
eggie (2021-04-09 21:23:18+00:00): Het cafe was ook al op de gebouwomtrek getagd.. Die heb ik maar verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
aceman444 (2021-04-18 01:02:53+00:00): Hi, how do you see an indoor pub on Bing imagery? Please always provide your real sources of the changes. If you were to the place and seen the pub closed, mention the source=survey , thanks.
kesy (2021-04-18 12:08:11+00:00): Hi,

you're right, this is something I saw personally. Thanks for the tip and sorry for the confusion.
Glassman (2021-04-12 16:25:45+00:00): #TIP: add the stop sign as a node on the road. Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102668546
felipeeugenio (2021-04-10 15:04:43+00:00): Hola Alonso
Buen trabajo en la Plaza de Armas

pero dándole una mirada mas profunda, hay cosas que no sé si son errores, hay cosas que son errores y hay preguntas que me surgen

1) fijate en las rectas de Maipú, Vicuña Mackenna y Balmaceda: Existen? dudo. En la foto satelital no se aprecian. 
2= Entiendo la representaciónd e la plaza como un pedestrian, pero es solo eso? le sacaste park. Qué estás tratando de representar? Quieres que superponga un poligono con park? por favor no unir el park con el pedestrian, ya que con los inner me vas a estar diciendo que no hay plaza.
3) al poner dos semaforos al hilo están diciendo que los vehículos tienen que, potencialmente, parar dos veces, lo que me imagino que es falso

Necesitas ayuda con esta plaza?
Se valora totalmente el esfuerzo, pero me da la idea de que tienes varias mezclas con algunos conceptos.

No obstante el trabajo está tremendo.

saludos
salve100 (2021-04-11 16:32:40+00:00): Gracias!!

y si hay algunas cosas que son erroneas, las rectas si existes, son molestas pero si estan ahi

y se cambio a pedestrian porque antes de la pandemia (no estoy seguro si aun se hace) habian mini ferias por toda la plaza, al lado de la estatua de violeta parra, al lado de los estacionamientos, al lado de los arboles y la fontana y otros lugares

los demas son errores
felipeeugenio (2021-04-11 20:32:04+00:00): Ok, le voy a meter mano para arreglar un puñado de cosas

en todo caso lo de la feria es circunstancial, no amerita un cambio en la condición de la plaza.

saludos
PVitt (2021-05-20 10:40:28+00:00): Der Verlauf von way 928634693 geht durch einen Weiher. Da scheint etwas seltsam zu sein.
yukawa (2021-05-20 17:33:04+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis auf den Fehler, hab das behoben.
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-03 19:20:54+00:00): Auch interessant: motor_vehicle=yes auf einem Pfad (=nur einspurige Fzge), und motorcar=no. Ziemlich unrund. ;-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164016891
Wegeschlenzer (2025-04-04 00:05:52+00:00): ja, das ist vielleicht etwas komisch, aber bei stärkerem hineinzoomen sieht man, dass auf dem Gelände bzw. im Zugangsbereich der Schule ein Parkplatz für Motorräder eingerichtet wurde...
Geo-Tobi (2025-04-04 05:41:56+00:00): Das würde ich dann - abhängig von der Beschilderung vor Ort - andersrum lösen: motor_vehicle=No, aber motorcycle=private
Wegeschlenzer (2025-04-06 09:21:24+00:00): Okay, auch ein guter Vorschlag!
Kha_nam (2021-04-14 11:01:57+00:00): Hi georgelien
fixed the over lapping unclassified highways kindly refer way 928644978,way 928644981,way 928644979,way 928644980
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102924581
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102669698
VA00 (2021-05-01 14:07:49+00:00): czemu brak połaczenia z https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177035889
ash_win (2021-04-12 12:13:26+00:00): Hi liyachue_m,
Aligned Residential road as it was overlapping with other road,kindly check with way 428481054
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102802055
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102669875
0000FF berries (2021-04-10 02:59:55+00:00): Hi there :) Thank you for improving the data :) Could you please try to remember adding meaningful descriptions to your changesets..?  Thanks a lot and happy mapping :)
SucreRouge (2021-04-10 04:41:38+00:00): Hi berries! Yes, I know that this is a wrong practice. I'll try to do in my changesets similar things so I can write a short description to what I did. Thanks for pointing that out, cause at first I did, but then I got bored, while I shouldn't. Will do, thanks!
0000FF berries (2021-04-16 20:07:33+00:00): Thank you SucreRouge :) Have a nice weekend :)
VA00 (2021-10-24 09:41:20+00:00): Bez przesady, ledwo widoczna polna dróżka. Przetagowałem.
VA00 (2021-10-24 09:42:10+00:00): Czy to nazwa oficjalna :-)
ammadeuus (2021-10-24 19:02:11+00:00): To nazwa potoczna, ale tak powstają nazwy oficjalne :)
opendcc (2021-04-10 06:18:25+00:00): Hallo,

please add a changeset comment like: added name:zh-Hant=* and/or name:zh-Hans=* for Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese (this is what was done here)
EnumMapper (2021-04-10 16:29:38+00:00): Hi,

Sorry that I did not add commit comment. Indeed the only changes are name:zh-Hans and zh-Hant
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
user_5359 (2021-04-10 06:30:41+00:00): Hello! You add bigger number of misspelled name values (you use Name instead name). I correct this, but have a look on https://www.oms.org/way/44523621 : The value of key Name and key name are different. Please correct this
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-21 22:12:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105112817 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
mariotomo (2021-04-09 22:39:17+00:00): Hola Alvarado, zi no te aquerdas cómo se excriben las cosas en OSM, síempre puedes preguntar en los grupos o en el foro o hasta podrías considerar utilizar el Wiki. 
aunque … la situación correcta era la que encontraste en la versión 1 del objeto que estás mejorando.
ovruni (2021-04-09 21:51:19+00:00): Hola RickJSanxez, gracias por contribuir en OSM, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han eliminado varias vías para volver a recrearlas, esto no mantien el historial de las mismas [0], por este motivo he revertido este conjunto de cambios. En caso desee modificar la posición de alguna vía por favor mueva los nodos que las conforman o en caso desee modificar la etiqueta cambie el valor correspondiente. Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Mantener_el_historial
trigpoint (2021-04-16 14:45:52+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM thank you for your edit however you have added  incorrect speedlimit data.

Where did you obtain the GPS traces you are using and what visual confirmation did you use?

Also what does ITS stand for?

Cheers Phil
JMc-ITS (2021-04-16 15:27:43+00:00): Hello, please don't remove my speed limit edit which you think is wrong. If you know that its wrong then why not add the correct speed and improve the data.
trigpoint (2021-04-16 15:33:15+00:00): I am intending to map the correct speed limits once I finish processing my video files.

However you have not answered my questions.

Cheers Phil
JMc-ITS (2021-04-16 15:47:34+00:00): A driver traveled through here less than 2 weeks ago and reported that the speed limit was 60. You will see this when you have watched your video. So my edit is correct, please don't be detrimental to the data by removing correct edits and not adding anything back at all.
trigpoint (2021-04-16 19:36:12+00:00): I see that you colleague has added the 50 mph section, although I have fixed his 30 mph section at Penley, it is 20 mph. Your driver must have been mistaken if he thought the limit was 60.
Sorry but going from knowing there are limit changes in a section to finding an processing imagery takes time, and crossing the border has been forbidden for much of the last year. Mapillary still has not published.

I intended to update the limits, but had other life stuff to do but felt it was more import that incorrect high limits are not displayed on a drivers satnav. No limit will always to better than being told I can do 60 when the limit is 50.

Cheers Phil
SomeoneElse (2021-04-09 21:58:58+00:00): Hello "Map Analysis Project Group 2021",
I think you might have nudged something in GoMap before your phone had a GPS location - you've nudged a navigation buoy in the Atlantic Ocean (by a tiny amount, so don't worry about it!).
Cheers,
Andy
InsertUser (2021-04-13 01:07:18+00:00): Are you sure you have verified all of these on site? Some of them appear to be in vegetable patches or private residences in aerial imagery. Many of the names also look more like descriptions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102672041
maxolasersquad (2021-05-12 19:00:03+00:00): This user has mapped a lot of non-existent feature around Tallahassee. I had to remove all of the recycling bins that were added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102672041 I'm wondering if this account was some class assignment where the students didn't make any real attempt at mapping actual features.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-12 19:30:14+00:00): Hi,
If anything needs to be reverted, please drop the DWG an email.
Cheers, 
Andy (from the DWG)
ivomo (2021-04-18 15:20:17+00:00): ¡Hola! Veo que igual estás empezando con la edición de mapas en OpenStreetMap, ya que recién has superado el tutorial con este cambio, así que te aviso: Has hecho un muy buen trabajo, pero te dejo una nota para aprender y seguir mejorando: acuérdate de cambiar los nombres por defecto de lo que sea que añadas; no recuerdo haber visto por aquí ningún parque que se llame "Local leisure park". Si me dices ya me paso yo por la zona y le pongo el nombre correcto, y ¡bienvenido a OSM!
BCNorwich (2021-04-30 08:07:02+00:00): Hi, The name "Offa's Dyke Path" is the name of the hiking route as a whole, not the name of individual sections of the route. The name "Offa's Dyke Path" is held in the route relation tagging, please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9649

Regards Bernard.
mc85eu (2021-04-30 09:23:14+00:00): Bernard,
Thanks very much for this. I didn't know.

Curiously, I don't see this larger relation at a more local (non-macro) level.

However, I won't tag/name any more individual sections now I know it exists. I love and want to add to OSM, not make it confusing!

Can you tell me if this also applies to Herefordshire Trail and Mortimer('s) Trail (et al), please Bernard?

I very much appreciate your help and advice,
Matthew
BCNorwich (2021-04-30 19:04:32+00:00): Hello Mathew,
In the iD editor you can bring up a relation (route) by opening a section of the route, click this link:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&way=695864305#map=19/52.82030/-3.12198 Then click the relation link, Hiking Route Offa's Dyke Path opens. Click on the name (Offa's Dyke Path) and the whole route relation opens up. I don't use iD but I think you can edit relations with it.

Mortimer('s) Trail is contained in a route relation here:- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/85905

The Herefordshire Trail doesn't have a route relation. If it's a recognized trail route it should/could be held in a route relation. If you like I can help to make it a route relation. Is there a website showing the whole trail?

This map shows Waymarked Trails and this link goes to Mortimors Trail:- https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#search?query=Mortimer+trail&map=12!52.2434!-2.9024

Regards Bernard
DressyPear4 (2021-04-10 09:53:14+00:00): Olá, o modo que você está inserindo esses pontos não é correto, apenas tags em inglês são válidas.
Você pode inserir restaurante na caixa de pesquisa e apenas preencher os campos já predefinidos.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102672440
RickJSanxez (2021-04-09 22:51:28+00:00): Hola Onruvi, paso a diario por esas calles y entre ir a Catastro de la municipalidad y preguntando quise contribuir un poco a que OSM fuese más preciso al menos en relación al nombre de las calles, muchas están mal dibujadas, con los nodos mal puestos y fue más sencillo para mí redibujarlo antes de andar moviendo nodos, si fueron tus trazos disculpa, no fue mi intención ofenderte. No volverá a pasar porque me marcho, pasé más de 1 hora de mi vida poniendo las calles y redibujándolas para que vengas tú y en un dos por tres lo arruines. Gracias por hacer mi primera experiencia en OSM una total decepción. Cuídate y por favor pon el nombre de las calles algún día, me gusta usar OSM y quisiera que cambiara para mejor.
ovruni (2021-04-09 23:11:00+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se recuperaron los nombres ingresados en el conjunto de cambios  102671827. Con respecto a los dibujos de las vías, estos pueden variar según que proveedor de imagen se utilice, incluso un mismo proveedor puede cambiar las imágenes (según el angulo de los satélites, nubes existentes, forma de procesar las imágenes, etc), como es este caso, que las vías fueron ingresadas con Bing unos años atras. Para este zona las imágenes de Bing no son mas actuales, sino como en muchas partes del Perú lo son las Maxar.
Saludos
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-09 22:08:07+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 102360267, 102361386, 102424241, 102436940, 102436959, 102436975, 102436985, 102437004, 102467246, 102478159, 102494905, 102495125, 102500180, 102501396, 102503986, 102507038, 102507818, 102510830, 102543377, 102591005, 102609627, 102637560, 102638548, 102640003, 102640301, 102662818, 102670091, 102671739.
Dawid2849 (2021-04-10 05:13:47+00:00): This guy restored his changes again with his 4th account :P
mueschel (2021-04-15 09:17:30+00:00): Hi,
du verwendest hier "modified:barrier" als Tag - das gibt es bisher nicht. Laut deiner Note klingt das nach einem klassischen Fall von "disused:" - die Barriere ist noch da, aber wird nicht mehr als solche benutzt.
BS97n (2021-04-15 09:20:29+00:00): Da hast du Recht. Du kannst das gerne anpassen.
FraukeLeo (2021-04-13 05:40:55+00:00): Hallo yukawa, wieso "muss" sie als tertiär gemapped werden?
yukawa (2021-04-13 07:00:40+00:00): Hallo FraukeLeo, ja stimmt "muss" nicht, ist vielleicht doof formuliert im Changeset. Ich sehe das aber auch für den Abschnitt der K51 zwischen Irmtraut und Seck als passend an in anbetracht, dass auch andere ähnlich gut ausgebaute Kreisstraßen im WW als tertiar gemappt sind.
FraukeLeo (2021-04-13 07:34:03+00:00): Hallo, alles gut :) ich kenn die Straße kaum, bin nur paar mal vorbeigefahren. wird also schon so passen. du hast recht, ich hab mich hier wirklich nur am "muss" gestört, weil wir nach Verkehrsbedeutung klassifizieren und nicht nach Nummer :)
eggie (2021-04-10 04:54:51+00:00): Beste Dave  Je het de verbinding tussen de Zuiderzeelaan en de Markerwaard;aan verwijderd.
Isd die verbinding er niet meer?
De voorgaande mapper was ikzelf.

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2021-04-10 05:50:53+00:00): Hello! Please use building=yes instead of buildingq=yes (I have corrected this)