piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2021-09-01 07:54:40+00:00): Just for info - I've joined an almost-but-not-joining cycleway in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110549057 and also filled in gaps in some relations there:
 
    Capital Ring (Section 01) (6080321, v53)
    Thames Path Extension (5401488, v60)
    Jubilee Greenway (380856, v560)

Best Regards,
Andy
Glassman (2021-09-02 17:25:45+00:00): #TIP: OSM spells out street names. The reason is that software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you change the street name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110534750
felipeeugenio (2021-08-31 23:03:38+00:00): Hola. si dibujas un circulo imperfecto, con la letra O se transforma en un circulo perfecto.

luego de eso puedes cortar la parte que no usas.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110534914
gordo anorexico (2021-09-01 23:50:58+00:00): Dale, gracias, lo voy a ver.
Mundilfari (2021-09-01 01:22:27+00:00): Hello - a couple notes on some of your changes around Georgetown Elementary:
- Please do not delete features just to redraw them (like the school building or the baseball field). Deleting + redrawing results in the object's history being lost. If you find a feature to be misplaced, move it, if it's shape isn't represented correctly, add or remove nodes as appropriate but keep the feature itself. 
- Please note that some imagery is terribly misaligned. This is particularly true when you're working with bing and one of the high-zoomlevel tiles is missing and a lower res level gets pulled in instead (like around the school). The perfect solution to this issue would be to realign your imagery to a gps track before moving objects around. Since a gps track isn't always available, aligning the imagery to something that is known to be right (like a nearby street that has been mapped already) is usually a feasible workaround. You can find more details in the wiki*.
- some buildings with "holes" in them (like the school). These "holes" are typically cut out of the building shape by creating something that's called a multipolygon. These are a little trickier to create than "normal" buildings. Essentially, you draw the outer shape; you draw a separate polygon for the piece that needs to be cut out; and then you create a relation that tells osm how these two polygons belong together. The wiki ** has a detailed example of how this is done in the iD editor you're using.

If you need any help, please let me know.

Thanks,

* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#ID

** https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#iD
Joel Amos (2021-09-02 02:46:04+00:00): ay nice!
noelbov (2021-09-01 11:03:46+00:00): Ik was er ook! Niet oké! Zie https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/route/8513257
Je hebt een stukje residentiele weg/Solveldstraat tussen Processievoetweg en Tielse Mottestraat 2x (overlappend) gemapt. Dus een stuk ongebruikt ...
Vandaar: https://www.knooppuntnet.nl/en/analysis/cycling/be/facts/RouteUnusedSegments
noelbov (2021-09-01 11:10:20+00:00): Heeft ook mpact op wandelroute 20-27, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2614655
Warin61 (2021-09-01 07:49:22+00:00): Hi,

The road is broken into pieces so it can be used as the boundary between suburbs. By joining it into one the boundaries don't make sense. 
See the DCS Base Map for boundaries - faint lines.
Stephen Males (2021-09-06 03:22:04+00:00): Thanks for letting me know. I'll update it without merging.
marczoutendijk (2021-09-02 08:04:53+00:00): You have marked a higway as a ford, is that correct?
Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2021-09-02 08:06:58+00:00): What is the meaning of "llllojoij"?
Please read:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Hanan Tikveša (2021-09-02 14:12:38+00:00): this changeset is reverted by
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110622449
Hanan Tikveša (2021-09-02 14:13:58+00:00): i mean i reverted this one
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110536412
marczoutendijk (2021-09-02 08:03:49+00:00): What exactly are you trying to put on the map with this edit?
Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Frans S (2021-09-01 13:43:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110537104
Kovoschiz (2021-09-01 06:04:46+00:00): This isn't exactly the best idea for a `historic=building`. It will be mixed up with the yet to be added info for the inherent structure and old use. If you want, you should draw a new area for the site around it.
NanMadol (2021-09-02 11:05:16+00:00): Hi Kovoschiz, thanks for the info here. I don’t see an issue with including both historic=building and tourism=museum on the same feature. Additional building tags I don’t think would create an issue for the museum itself unless you have a specific case you’re thinking of. Is there a larger campus area that includes outdoor space for this museum? If so I could create a larger polygon around the area, otherwise it seems like the building is the museum. Let me know what you think, thanks!
Pixelcrunch (2021-10-10 15:39:52+00:00): Лол)))
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could that they didn't stop to think if they should." Jurassic Park

PS
кстати можно еще ASCII кодами
рисовать в принципе))) Ставим поинт даем ему имя из одного символа и т.д.
d1sr4n (2021-10-11 00:28:54+00:00): Можно, ну да.

Но это не для интересной идеи, а для эффективности сделано.
d1sr4n (2021-10-11 00:37:07+00:00): Я искал способ маппить быстро, много и не оставляя пробелов, но при этом сохранить возможность понимать уровень детализации при чтении карты человеком.
rthik007 (2021-09-02 05:54:07+00:00): "HI LinenFabricManila,
I have dragged the 
node 7589387151
node 9055146112 
and re aligned properly
as these are overlapping with other highways 
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110596116.
Thank you
"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110541169
Сергей Аникин (2021-09-01 06:15:50+00:00): Завершено.
julcnx (2021-09-01 07:21:30+00:00): "Soi 9 is not accessible" What are you trying to do? Customers can only enter from the east side ? What about Soi 9?
"ซอย 9 ไม่สามารถเข้าถึงได้" คุณกำลังพยายามทำอะไรอยู่ ? ลูกค้าเข้าได้จากฝั่งตะวันออกเท่านั้น ? แล้วซอย 9 ล่ะ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110541404
vulasala (2021-09-02 05:00:30+00:00): Hi พึ่งทองเรสซิเด้นท์ แม่โจ้-Peungthong Residence,
Trust you are doing well. I have removed the oneway tag for way 388792943 as the path is bidirectional way.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110541404
mavl (2021-09-02 16:00:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap. Этот пакет правок добавляет адресные данные. Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника они взяты?
mavl (2021-09-02 16:28:32+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет новые данные (например, дороги) прямо поверх существующих. Так не нужно делать. Этот пакет правок нужно будет отменять.
adrianojbr (2021-09-02 00:27:38+00:00): Olá, Evandro? A Rua Feliciano Luiz Gonçalves não tem mais continuidade? Pelas imagens de satélite (Bing, Esri e Maxar) parece haver a continuidade, que é confirmada também por traços do Strava. O impedimento de passagem é somente para veículos? É possível passar a pé ou de bicicleta?
adrianojbr (2021-09-07 00:29:06+00:00): Respondido na nota 2830256.
rthik007 (2021-09-02 08:40:37+00:00): "HI Lagipula,
I have changed the classification of road from tertiary to residential. WAY: 571943523 
Previous data is fine.
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110604920.
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110542483
Lagipula (2021-09-02 08:46:20+00:00): 👍
mavl (2021-09-02 16:07:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет линии без тегов. Вероятно, это ошибка.
bdentremont (2025-03-11 23:39:32+00:00): Greg Rose:
Have you seen this bridge?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978314272
I hiked this about 11 months before you marked it.  The fords are real.  If there's a bridge here, I've forgotten it.  
It seems odd to have a bridge over a small creek that can only be accessed by four fords of a bigger creek.

Unfortunately, my one photo is of the cabin taken with the creek to my back.
Greg_Rose (2025-03-12 00:25:59+00:00): If I remember correctly, there was a social media post about a "tiny bridge" leading to the cabin - if there's no bridge actually there PLEASE fix it! :)
-Greg
Greg_Rose (2025-03-12 00:31:34+00:00): fyi - I mapped this 3½ years ago, and Bing imagery from 4 years ago shows the bridge.
bdentremont (2025-03-12 00:40:47+00:00): Yes, I see what you are talking about now and doubt doubt there may have been very small bridge that escapes my memory. Thanks for checking!
mavl (2021-09-02 16:25:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет новые данные (например, дороги) прямо поверх существующих. Так не нужно делать. Этот пакет правок нужно будет отменять.
Anonix35 (2022-02-05 15:51:05+00:00): Do you know until when the path will be closed?
portalaventura (2021-09-01 19:28:24+00:00): Excelente contribuição. Parabéns.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110544173
RaccoonFederation (2021-09-01 08:23:52+00:00): Did you have a good flight?
Cedricvr (2021-09-01 08:30:31+00:00): Yes, thanks! 
that a weird changeset because I had a leftover that wasn't uploaded.
Sorry for that, I should have upload them separately.
RaccoonFederation (2021-09-01 09:57:41+00:00): :-)
ravali_78 (2021-09-02 05:06:19+00:00): Hi Nyi Nyi Nyan Lin
I have removed layer tag for the unclassified highways as it is not supporting in any of the imagery.Kindly check with way 978322363,way 533214124,way 978322361,way 978322365, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110593764.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110544781
banban_msm (2021-12-14 01:56:45+00:00): This is an interesting feature of OSM. It is possible to map at least approximate alignments of rails or roads that are still under construction by getting overlays from more recent satellite images than those usual drop down list in JOSM. There is construction going on now to add another Temerloh Bridge to the current one so that one bridge handle 2 lanes one way. Not sure if any Sentinel 2 images have been lately captured over that bridge.
I don't have any idea how to overlay Sentinel 2 images in JOSM. Sometimes I do think that the images on JOSM over an area is a bit aged but have no choice.
AkuAnakTimur (2021-12-15 15:03:07+00:00): @banban_msm

I'll get back to you with my secrets (*wink wink*). The changeset discussion section is very basic, and I might have a lot to share.
Владимир К (2022-01-12 06:16:47+00:00): путевой пост не станция
StefanHRT (2021-09-01 07:39:28+00:00): Hallo,
Du hast in der Nonnendammallee einige Dinge in puncto Radfahren durch einander gebracht. An einigen Stellen war use_sidepath gesetzt, da dort zwar ein Nutzungspflichtiger Radweg ist, den muss man aber unter gewissen Umständen wiederum nicht nutzen (z.B. wenn der Radweg im Winter nicht gestreut wird). Andere Stellen haben keinen nutzungspflichtigen Radweg und wurden daher auf optional_sidepath gesetzt, hier ist das bicycle=no gänzlich falsch. VG
GaryElstal (2021-09-01 12:17:53+00:00): Hallo Stefan,
das stimmt. Ich habe nicht an den Winter und den unzureichenden Winterdienst gedacht....
Frans S (2021-09-02 11:03:48+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points. 
Square the buildings.

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110546984
ortho_is_hot (2021-09-05 11:08:55+00:00): Hi there,

It seems that there is now a duplicate overlapping Howe Field Road between the intersection of Scarer's Lane and the bridge over the waterway. Would you be able to fix this up?

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
literan (2021-09-01 16:38:02+00:00): это не тротуар, зачем ложный тег проставляете?
Dilon Pait (2021-09-02 15:57:47+00:00): Здравствуйте. Посмотрел определение. Да. Не подходит к определению. Забывать уже русский язык начал
Geo-Tobi (2024-10-05 08:50:57+00:00): Smoothness intermediate auf einem tracktype grade4 klingt sehr unstimmig. Bitte tracktype prüfen und ggfs korrigieren.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35424264
SekeRob (2021-09-01 09:14:51+00:00): See, not that hard and smaller change sets make for easier commenting too ,o)
rthik007 (2021-09-02 06:52:00+00:00): "HI Naufal Nur Ramadhani,
I have removed the road from node 6229298273 to node 5519431629. it is not a path it iswaterway.
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110599432.
Thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110549132
ivanbranco (2024-04-14 10:52:52+00:00): Hi Landry GAIFFE,

seems like all the imported trees have incorrect circumference=* values. Such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9052696963/history with circumference=55. The world record is 43m, so it's likely that the values you imported are in centimeters. 

They should all be fixed with circumference=55 cm or circumference=0.55

Also the standard for species is to add the complete name. Example species=Populus nigra instead of species=nigra
Landry GAIFFE (2024-04-14 11:18:38+00:00): Hi, indeed, I will correct that if possible when I have some time in about two weeks
ivanbranco (2021-09-16 15:36:55+00:00): Did you follow the import guidelines?
See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

The only standard tag seems natural=tree to me, the other are all in french language (while tags are in english language by convention). For example you added 16.475 espece=* tags while there's the species=* tag. Can you fix this import?
Landry GAIFFE (2021-09-16 17:51:20+00:00): Indeed, I'm sorry. It seemed to me, however, to have done everything. I will correct my mistake in two or three days. To answer you, I discovered this article very recently. I did not use it. I only asked questions in the French Discord server. My excuses.
goaned (2022-12-25 20:03:55+00:00): siehe bitte die Diskussion auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89964428#map=14/47.0101/10.2825
Dino Michelini (2021-09-01 08:15:29+00:00): Ciao ti segnalo che la relazione 12991803 (Percorso CAI 207A) presenta dei problemi (vedi http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=12991803 e https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=12991803). Inoltre, la lettera riferita al ref va messa in maiuscolo.
Dino Michelini (2021-09-01 08:17:42+00:00): Il name nel percorso 978348330 non va messo.
Dino Michelini (2021-09-02 16:21:14+00:00): Guardando attentamente il changeset risulta che hai costruito la route del CAI 207A (https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=12991803) non utilizzando i path/track disegnati dal 2017 ed utilizzati nelle route della Variante Valcheta (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10295362) della Via Francigena o della Via Romea ma disegnando nuove geometrie adiacenti a quelle esistenti ma è un lavoro inutile in quanto se le geometrie sono le stesse per un tratto utilizzato da più route non si fa che utilizzare quelle già disegnate, perché in Infomont sarebbero comunque entrate in quanto la query di estrazione dal data base di OSM non viene fatta sulle geometrie ma sulle route. Altro appunto. I percorsi CAI 207A e il 208 non sono varianti ufficiali della Via Francigena (https://www.viefrancigene.org/it/resource/statictrack/tappa-44-variante-1-valchetta/) ma percorsi CAI, quindi cose tipo "variante..." o "Via Francigena.." nel name andrebbero tolte perché 
 esistono da tempo delle route della Via Francigena.
berndw (2021-09-01 16:46:46+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Hier etwas zu lesen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap

Dort findest Du auch Hinweise wie man Radiologen oder anderes richtig erfasst ;-)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE%3AKey%3Ahealthcare

Und hier eine Anleitung zum sauberen Editieren
https://einklich.net/osm/osm-tutorial.pdf

Für weitere Fragen steh ich gerne zur Verfügung

Bernd
mueschel (2021-09-02 09:00:34+00:00): Please check your edits, there are many tags with spelling mistakes.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-04-01 15:11:44+00:00): Hoi Tilia_J,

Weet je zeker dat bij de kruising van https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60637313 wel gras ligt? Sommige van die kleine grasveldjes die je bij deze kruising gemapt hebt zien er op de 7.5 cm luchtbeelden en op de 2021 S&P beelden niet uit als gras.

Mvg,
Casper
Tilia_J (2022-04-01 15:40:26+00:00): Toen ik hier bezig was, zat ik te worstelen met het feit dat dit kruispunt recent heringericht is en moest ik het doen met zowel info van de oude als de nieuwe situatie. Zonder hier opnieuw naar gekeken te hebben zou die landuse op details  odd niet helemaal correct kunnen zijn.
Friendly_Ghost (2022-04-01 16:04:37+00:00): Ik ken iemand die hier nog wel eens langskomt. Ik kan vragen of hij de huidige situatie voor ons kan observeren.
bernardo60 (2022-04-14 00:43:43+00:00): Hi Martin
I just saw your profile on OSM and I am happy to communicate with an enthusiastic mapper. I live here in Bali and map everything I can reach with my bicycle. I saw your tag of w797929980 as "Living Street". It's actually too narrow for four-wheel vehicles and should be a path instead. In Indonesian, it's a "Gang", ok for motorbikes or pedestrians. I know that "Living Street" is in the Indonesian tagging guidelines, but it should be changed, because for a living street, you need a legal framework which prioritizes pedestrians before vehicles. What in Indonesia is called "gang", is either an "alley way" if it is wide enough for cars, or a "path". What do you think? In the meantime, allow me to reclassify w797929980. Best wishes, Werner
martinmbaihaqi (2022-04-14 07:05:44+00:00): Thanks bernard for commenting on this Changeset, I'm glad to hear that. Actually, I can add tag "motorcar=no" on the highway living street, because this road can be passed by two-wheeled motorized vehicles fot the best route. Best regards bernard :)
Sriosm (2021-09-01 09:35:17+00:00): Removed unnecessary noexit tag and modified the geometry #MSFTOpenMaps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110551654
SafetyIng (2021-09-01 10:58:13+00:00): Hey,
irgendwie ist die Gebäude-Relation nicht so pralle....

Ist es wirklich ein zusammengängendes (durchgängiges) Gebäude? Dann sollte das Gebäude als relation type=building erfasst werden. 
Wenn nicht, dann ggf aufsplitten. Aber das Multipoligon so ist halt so im Aufbau schlecht auswertbar.... Auch sind dort keine Grenzen vergeben (inner / outer)
stoerte (2021-09-01 11:08:10+00:00): Jo, das Gebäude ist durchgängig. Das mit dem Label type=building ist mir entgangen, bearbeite ich gleich mal. Um die Innen- und Außengrenzen kann ich mich auch gleich mal kümmern. Sollte ich dazu die einzelnen Gebäudeteile, die Gebäude oder separate Linien labeln, was meinst du?
SafetyIng (2021-09-01 15:23:37+00:00): Also ich wäre so vorgegangen:

1. die gesamten aktuell gezeichneten Gebäude als building:part=* umgetaggt.
2. Dann ein Multipolygon um das gesamte Gebäude (außenlinie als role=outer, innen die Höfe als role=inner) an das kommen dann die Bezeichnung mit building=* und so weiter.
3. eine Relation type=building mit den mitgliedern;:
role=outline - das multipolygon "Außenlinie"
role=part - alle building:parts
4. die Eingänge mit den Hausnummern hätte ich so belassen auf der Außenlinie, wo die jeweiligen Eingänge sind.
SafetyIng (2021-09-01 15:23:55+00:00): Ich hoffe so verständlich?
stoerte (2021-09-01 15:27:57+00:00): Jo, ist so verständlich. Habe ich jetzt in einem neueren Änderungssatz auch so bearbeitet. Bei den aktuellen Gebäuden muss ich schauen, ob ich die schon umgetaggt habe.
Antonio Eugenio Burriel (2021-11-05 18:15:44+00:00): Ana, this changeset is wrong and doesn't match the present state of the area. You have used outdated imaginary.
skyper (2021-09-02 20:40:00+00:00): Hallo ferrero2
Ist das Stadion von außen wirklich ein Rechteck? Soviel Ich weiß, ist das nur das überstehende Dach und die Form hat vorher recht gut gestimmt. Würde das Dach

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2021-09-04 13:08:39+00:00): Oh, sorry, da habe ich irgendwie nicht meinen kompletten Kommentar veröffentlicht.

Habe das Dach und das Gebäude mal getrennt. Ist aber noch verbesserungswürdig.

Ciao skyper
ferrero2 (2021-09-04 16:39:10+00:00): Vielen Dank!
Larmax (2021-09-01 08:39:19+00:00): Brahenpuisto not porthananpuisto
MatthieuMartin (2021-11-11 18:12:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Le commentaire "existance ?" sur le way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591384250
a sa place uniquement sur une balise fixme=*
Voir : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Notez_les_approximations_avec_FIXME

Bonne carto ! 
Cordialement,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110552434
mueschel (2021-09-02 08:58:02+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong with this import.
All the objects have only foreign tags that shouldn't be in OSM.

In the process you also deleted many already existing trees with more valid tags than the new ones.

Where can we find the mandatory discussion and documentation of this import?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Frans S (2021-09-02 11:02:30+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key.
Don't include the shadow of the building in your mapping
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110553142
FrankOverman (2021-10-04 17:55:27+00:00): Op gebouwen worden geen adres node gegevens gezet: die horen immers op de adres node, hier op nr 85. Corrigeer je dit aub weer, bedankt.
snoozingnewt (2021-09-07 02:23:52+00:00): Why did you change this road to primary?
osmviborg (2021-09-01 11:53:38+00:00): Hej. Når hastigheden er skiltet, så brug gerne tagget 'source:maxspeed=sign'
impiaaa (2022-09-03 19:21:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/978368378 Please draw straight roads as straight roads and circular roads as circular, not some scribble. If this was traced directly from a GPX track, that is unacceptable.