piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
GOwin (2015-02-15 00:47:56+00:00): For a building with a BPO, the following tags could be applied:

building=commercial
name=*
addr:city=*
addr:province=*
addr:street=*
addr:barangay=*

For a building with multiple tenants operating as different companies, each node may have
name=*
office=company
MCDA (2015-02-17 21:04:41+00:00): Again you have removed valid townland tags!  This change-set should be reverted.
MCDA (2015-02-17 21:02:39+00:00): You have removed the tags from a valid townland.  This change-set should be re-verted.
zool (2015-02-20 05:40:34+00:00): This changeset appears to delete a townland relation created as part of the "Mapping Townlands" project: 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ireland/Mapping_Townlands
MCDA (2015-02-17 20:32:10+00:00): This change-set should be reverted, as the name has been removed from a valid townland relation.
zool (2015-02-20 05:37:36+00:00): The townland appears to be from the "mapping townlands" effort and is needed in some cases for addressing and local navigation. 

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ireland/Mapping_Townlands
MCDA (2015-02-20 11:42:28+00:00): hi zool.  Yes, the townland is part of the project.  The problem I have with this user and the majority of his/her change-sets is that data (mostly names) is being deleted from OSM, mainly suburbs and townlands.  I have messaged the user directly, but no answer.  I would like to know why the user is deleting this data and claiming that it is "local knowledge".  GSGS3906 clearly shows that townland is called Poleglass ( http://maps.openstreetmap.ie/oocmapstest.html?zoom=15&lat=54.564&lon=-6.02585&layers=0000TFFFFFTFFFF ) yet the user is removing it's name and claiming that it is from local knowledge.
zool (2015-02-21 06:46:42+00:00): hi KDDA, 

Indeed i'm involved in this discussion on behalf of the DWG, another mapper brought the deletions to our attention saying he didn't want to make a big deal of it, but it looks like some data disruption is being caused. See also http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28819735 for the deletion of a townland relation. 

However, i would say that on balance the user's edits over time look constructive, so i've written to ask more about the motivation behind the deletions and how we can work out an equitable solution.

As usual, everyone would benefit from leaving more explicit changeset comments; it doesn't have to be an essay, just a good sentence...
MCDA (2015-02-21 14:03:54+00:00): Thanks for looking into it Zool.  Is there a time frame on how long a decision from the DWG takes?
MCDA (2015-02-21 14:10:07+00:00): I would just like to point out that here in NI, the townland within the address is a legal requirement.  The official (copyrighted) address source is called PointerNI and is maintained by the LPS. ( http://www.nidirect.gov.uk/pointer )  

The local OSM community have been working very hard to map the town-lands from out of copyright sources which is extremely time consuming and hard work.  Which is why I dont like to see someone's hard work removed for no reason.
zool (2015-02-23 05:37:32+00:00): Hi KDDA, there's no timeframe for the DWG, case-by-case basis, as we've heard nothing back about the townlands deletions, but we'll likely go ahead and revert them very soon. Sorry to be vague here, it's all very much a volunteer effort.
zool (2015-02-24 10:02:40+00:00): All right, it's been a week so I am now going ahead and reverting the following list of deleteing changesets on behalf of the DWG:

28796127
28796946
28796962
28808425
28808611
28819183
28819610
28819668
28819735
28819839
28819905
28819922
28819932
28820084
28820242
28820246
28820281
28820362
28820440
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-12 17:32:33+00:00): For http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3070227461 the tagging is now http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Toilet_Holding_Tank_Disposal
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-12 17:33:32+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Toilet_Holding_Tank_Disposal
Barrocas (2015-05-12 21:09:38+00:00): Thanks for the heads up, I modified the tag to:
amenity=sanitary_dump_station - Standalone facility for land users,

As specified in the wiki.
MCDA (2015-02-17 20:21:09+00:00): Is this area not Turf Lodge?
NetWormKido (2015-02-16 14:00:05+00:00): Ты зачем в Приволжье еще одну точку place добавил? есть уже: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/336526375
Gumeg (2015-02-17 07:27:59+00:00): Валидатор подвел.. Он до сих пор странное что-то показывает. http://peirce.gis-lab.ru/qa/RU-SAR#citiessummary Например, что у Приволжья население не прописано.
NetWormKido (2015-02-17 08:06:05+00:00): Подожди следующего прохода валидатора, если останется ошибка - пиши на форум http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=484640#p484640
Swen Wacker (2015-02-14 10:36:21+00:00): Moin,

hattest Du eigentlich Fehlermeldungen bei diesem Changeset? Denn der Changeset hat, sicherlich ohne dass Du das wolltest, bei jeder Bus-Relation, die dort langläuft, den Verlauf beschädigt. 

Nebenbei: Ich fahre diese Kreuzung (as Richtung Bahnhof kommend) im Sommer täglich mit dem Rad und mir ist noch nie aufgefallen, dass es keine "Kreuzung" im engeren Sinne ist, dass die Haagestraße sich also nicht verlängert in die Wallstraße. 

Lass uns mal am Dienstag auf dem Stammtisch drüber reden.

Gruß

Swen
StephaneP (2015-04-27 07:46:46+00:00): La station service n'existe plus, maintenant c'est une agence de location Ucar
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3347922589
http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/DRKzvgmECMcwtA8yReNZhQ
tyr_asd (2015-02-13 17:08:17+00:00): Thank you for fixing so many routing data issues! But, can you please try to generate less continent-spanning changesets in the future? That would be great.
ratrun (2015-02-13 19:01:29+00:00): I slowly increased my action radius and obviously went too far, as I nearly synchrounously got a similar comment for changeset

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28799534

Please look up my answer there.
m902 (2015-02-13 20:19:25+00:00): "Pavement alongside A37.." etc is not a name, it is a description. Please don't put descriptions in the name field. Use a 'note' tag if needed.
CycleStreets (2015-02-14 20:43:00+00:00): Apologies - now corrected..
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/28850592
Stalfur (2015-02-13 18:21:54+00:00): Excellent to see these additions in Shakawe. A reminder that you can make houses more square by having it selected and hitting S on keyboard, or use the radial menu and click Orthogonalize.
Dimitar155 (2021-10-04 19:22:04+00:00): Hi balkanyug,
Do you remember why you've added ref:ruian:building tag to a lot of buildings and what does it mean?
Regards,
Dimitar155
Stalfur (2015-02-13 17:50:41+00:00): Very happy to see Maun getting more attention!
Stalfur (2015-02-13 18:23:01+00:00): One friendly advice, which I myself wish I had learnt sooner! You can make houses more square by highlighting it and press S on keyboard, or use the radial menu and pick Orthogonalize.

Map on!
salix01 (2015-02-16 11:49:31+00:00): Hallo JosClag,
damit die Inseln innerhalb der Wasserfläche richtig dargestellt werden können gehören die Eigenschaften des Multipolygon an die Relation und nicht an den outer way. Ich werde das gleich ändern.
Viele Grüße
Olaf
cadsauxk (2015-02-24 00:24:48+00:00): por favor use highway=track somente para trilhas de uso agrícola. Vias em terra devem ser marcadas normalmente mas recebendo a descrição da superfície com surface=unpaved caso não sejam pavimentadas.
j03lar50n (2015-02-13 19:44:00+00:00): I think A74 is more appropriate than A51 for this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10535225 ...as per this reference http://proximityone.com/tgrcfcc.htm
j03lar50n (2015-02-13 19:50:56+00:00): I think A51 is more appropriate than A41 for this way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10552398 ...as per this reference http://proximityone.com/tgrcfcc.htm
SomeoneElse (2015-02-24 01:09:53+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Thanks for adding some footpaths in this bit of South Wales - there are relatively few mappers in this part of the world so every addition helps.  One thing that I noticed though - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328013701 doesn't seem to join the road at the western end (the imagery suggests it joins a service road that runs north).  Having footpaths and roads that join allows hand-held GPSs (and now routing on the main site) to direct people over them, so if two things join in real life it makes sense to have them join in OSM too.
Anyway - hope you don't mind me saying this; just trying to help.  Any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
- Andy
(not a local, just an occasional visitor to this part of the world).
JLeupold (2015-02-17 18:50:08+00:00): Testnachricht von Johann!!!!
JLeupold (2015-02-17 18:52:29+00:00): Ohne zu wissen, um was es geht, kommt hier der Kommentar
zimba (2015-02-13 20:19:38+00:00): So, ist die Wälderstraße jetzt eine Brücke, eine Einbahnstraße oder Schneise ganz ohne Wald?

Oder anderst gefragt: Willst du wirklich etwas Konstruktives beitragen oder probierst du nur wirr irgendwelche Tags aus?
Sara Mo (2015-02-13 18:53:47+00:00): Ciao, ho corretto la posizione della torre spagnola. Verificata sul posto,

S
Nakaner (2016-10-11 15:50:31+00:00): Hallo mapper999,

ich habe die umgebaute Haltestelle Ebertstraße in Karlsruhe gestern Abend genauer inspiziert und geschaut, welche "street cabinets" wohin verlegt wurden. Einen von dir gemappten KVz konnte ich nicht mehr finden.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3348390360/history

Dumme Frage, aber hast du den damals an der korrekten Stelle gemappt? :-) Kannst du, falls du sie noch hast, deine Aufzeichnungen von damals hervorholen und nachschauen?

Viele Grüße

Michael
mapper999 (2016-10-11 19:56:16+00:00): Hallo Michael,
ich denke schon, dass der KVz damals korrekt eingetragen wurde, Aufzeichnungen dazu habe ich aber keine mehr. Falls der KVz nach dem Umbau nicht mehr dort steht, kannst du ihn gerne löschen.
Viele Grüße
Steffen
simon04 (2015-03-05 22:56:58+00:00): Ich wollte die geplante Erweiterung der Linie 26 mit einem Link nach https://www.wien.gv.at/stadtentwicklung/projekte/verkehrsplanung/strassenbahn/linie26.html versehen. Allerdings wird dort ein anderer Verlauf dargestellt. Welcher ist aktueller?
SomeoneElse (2015-02-15 19:46:02+00:00): This changeset has a huge bounding box and a not especially helpful changeset comment ("unconnected major roads (Geofabrik)"). If this comes up in the changeset history for someone, how will they know what has been changed locally to them and why?  Would it be possible to use smaller bounding boxes explaining what wasn't joined to what and what changes were made?
Theodin (2015-02-15 21:30:24+00:00): Youre absolutely right. I was working with the Geofabrik tools showing unconnected major roads but my settings got messed up so I accidentally put all of my edits in one changeset. I usually do things differently because I too dont like those huge bounding boxes. For more infos about the changeset history, people can use the changeset viewer:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Achavi
SomeoneElse (2015-02-17 11:36:30+00:00): Achavi http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=28828300 doesn't seem to load large changesets very often for me.  An alternative, osmhv, http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=28828300 usually works better but can fail if it gets an intermittent 500 from the API.
maraf24 (2015-02-16 20:45:58+00:00): surface=ground jest najlepszym sposobem oznaczenia drogi gruntowej.
Podsuwane przez edytor iD "highway=track" jako droga gruntowa to nadużycie.
Adam_Piszczek (2015-02-17 10:37:58+00:00): higway=track można użyć   http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=444750      http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
maraf24 (2015-02-17 11:08:32+00:00): Od 2010 tag highway określa ważność drogi, a nie jej fizyczne atrybuty. Tak ustalono w dyskusji ogólnoświatowej.
Jeśli droga jest gruntowa a pełni istotną funkcję to nie wolno użyć "track". 
Z drugiej strony jeśli droga nie pełni żadnej funkcji - wiedzie donikąd - należy użyć track bez względu na jej nawierzchnię. Istnieją drogi brukowane prowadzące na pola. Oznacza się je jako "track".
Proszę się nie sugerować dyskusjami na polskiej wiki. Niektóre osoby do dziś się nie zorientowały w przeprowadzonej zmianie znaczenia tagu highway, niektóre też nie znają angielskiego i posługują się tylko polską wiki, gdzie w tłumaczeniach są błędy.
I jeszcze: polska "droga gruntowa" nie ma swojego odpowiednika w OSM. Można mówić tylko o drodze nieutwardzonej, bezpieczne tagowanie to surface=unpaved a nie surface=ground.
Mozna też dodać starszy tag tracktype.
Np. highway=residential + tracktype=grade2 to będzie droga gruntowa pełniąca funkcję dojazdową.

OsmAnd uwzględnia surface i tracktype dla określania,czy droga jest twarda czy nie.
evod (2015-03-06 21:22:42+00:00): Hallo Linie29, 

die Radwege in der Wexstraße hast du nicht ganz optimal eingetragen. 1) weil sie doppelt gemappt sind (auf der Hauptfahrbahn & als getrennte ways), 2) weil der Weg Richtung Osten nicht auf die Straße zurückgeht (Routing-Fail), und 3) würde ich einen getrennten Fuß-und-Radweg als cycleway=yes, foot=yes, segregated=yes mit einer Geometrie taggen.

Wie siehst du das? OK wenn ich es ändere?

LG,
evod
Linie29 (2015-03-06 23:20:21+00:00): Hallo,
Ja das ist kein Problem wenn es korrigiert wird. Vorallem der dritte Punkt ist eine gute Idee damit das die Darstellung ein wenig übersichtlicher wird.
mfG
Linie29
vampire303 (2017-07-15 07:59:16+00:00): A forrás neve: Alsó forrás
muralito (2015-02-14 03:58:26+00:00): S/N no es nombre. Si la calle no tiene nombre no hay que ponerle nada, o a lo sumo usar la etiqueta noname=yes
JaggedMind (2015-02-15 08:36:24+00:00): I reverted this in chageset 28857314. 67th Avenue does not connect to CA 86.
abel801 (2015-02-17 14:48:43+00:00): Thank you for your reversion -this was my mistake.
eggie (2020-02-02 12:35:24+00:00): Na jaren weer een edit, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
zool (2015-02-14 04:10:35+00:00): Thank you for your edits to OpenStreetmap. 
Did you know that in the iD editor, you can leave a comment with each change? This helps other editors to see more easily what you are adding and changing on the map; clear comments are helpful and recommended!
TRUEVISIONS (2015-02-14 09:44:19+00:00): hat bisher gefehlt
zool (2015-02-14 10:42:51+00:00): macht bisher nichts, then 

(Sorry, i don't speak German!)
zaizone (2017-07-18 18:16:57+00:00): Hi muindre, could you make some precisions about the elements you have added ? It seems not to match with imageries. Could you review your changesets in that area ? Thanx
Everette M (2019-01-30 23:13:07+00:00): Eventually.
trigpoint (2015-02-14 11:04:31+00:00): Hi, I think this something went very wrong with this changeset. I have reverted it as it damaged a main road in Liverpool and you added your business name to a footpath also in Liverpool despite claiming a wirral postcode.
Please bear in mind that anything in OSM needs to be verifiable on the ground, work from home businesses are not normally allowed unless there is clear signage.
The area already has buildings drawn, so adding a node is not really appropriate here. You should add tags to the actual building concerned.
RicoElectrico (2016-07-31 13:56:33+00:00): Czy to:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173274900
rzeczywiście zasługuje na highway=bus_guideway?
Ten tag jest dla autobusów torowych.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_guideway
Proszę o poprawę.
Jrachi (2021-10-31 17:05:27+00:00): Ciao.
Mi spieghi il significato dei tag:
EDIFC_TY=chiesa
EDIFC_USO=luogo di culto
che hai usato in questo changeset?
Non so cosa c'era nel 2015,
 ma vorrei sapere se hanno ancora qualche significato
emacsen (2015-02-14 11:42:54+00:00): What redundant tags? You seem to be working off a very large number of features here.
emacsen (2015-02-16 12:33:09+00:00): peace2,

You keep making these large changesets with very obscure changeset comments? Can you please try to make more descriptive comments of what you're changing and why?
Supaplex (2015-02-15 05:55:23+00:00): ref還是用本地慣用的中文吧，ref:en再放Blue 2吧
zool (2015-02-17 00:00:17+00:00): dear Nev,

One of my DWG colleagues had the following suggestion about footpath mapping: "In reality I suspect it's not really a separate footpath at all but just 
a roadside sidewalk, so I'd have thought that sidewalk=left/right/both 
on the road itself would be the best representation of the situation 
within the data.  That has the downside that almost nothing renders it, 
though."

It would help with negotiations with other more routing-centric mappers if you too could use longer changeset comments, explaining the motivation for changes in a bit better depth... 

- Jo
nevw (2015-02-17 01:27:22+00:00): Thanks Jo
I will make my changesets smaller and save more often with more descriptive text. 
I do like this method "A different approach is to map each sidewalk as separate ways using highway=footway and an associated footway=sidewalk" as we have many streets without sidewalks, and some suburbs with just one or few footways, and it is best to render those that are present for cyclists, pedestrians and for the disabled in wheelchairs on the main map.
zool (2015-02-17 02:25:14+00:00): I appreciate the response, Nev!

In my personal capacity, i think "tagging for the router / tagging for the renderer" is a trend with long legs...
nevw (2015-02-17 02:31:22+00:00): :)
darkk (2015-02-17 08:31:55+00:00): А там действительно линии электропередач (power=line) повторяют контуры разметки футбольного поля?
См. также http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tagging_for_the_renderer
woodpeck (2015-05-19 20:11:31+00:00): Wie bist Du bei dieser "Adressenkorrektur" genau vorgegangen? Warum hast Du beispielsweise die Bären-Apotheke http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/69226060/history#map=19/52.51071/13.39092 verschoben? Sie hat zwar die postalische Adresse "Friedrichstr.", der Eingang ist aber von der Leipziger Str., so wie sie vorher auch eingetragen war. Hast Du diese Änderungen ohne Ortskenntnis allein anhand der Straßennamen vorgenommen? Dann sollten sie komplett revertiert werden.
BladeTC (2016-09-26 18:28:34+00:00): Hey brother, can you fix the wrong color for some of the roofs, who are tagged "red" but they are "grey"?!
Thanks!
OSM-Bot (2016-09-27 13:48:31+00:00): nein, ich war vor Ort.
RoterEmil (2017-02-17 10:22:11+00:00): die Adressen der Botschaften von Chile, Peru und Liechtenstein wurden in diesem CS auf Oranienburger Str. 13 gesetzt. Habe dies wieder geändert. Im Fall von Liechtenstein besonders "schön", da im CS (15738943) selbst die Adresse richtig gesetzt worden war...

auch die Adresse der Apotheke im "Alexa" (n322490383) wurde aus unerfindlichen Gründen mit einer falschen Adresse versehen (ebenfalls bereits rückgängig gemacht).

nach weiteren fehlerhaften Adressänderungen in diesem CS habe ich (noch) nicht geschaut
OSM-Bot (2019-10-20 08:33:11+00:00): Danke.
emacsen (2015-02-14 11:46:01+00:00): It looks like you're trying to fix the NJ landuse import. Do you have any thoughts on just removing the entire thing (other than where folks like you or I have edited it?)
chnav (2015-02-15 08:27:08+00:00): Все правки откачены как вандальные т.к. бфли удалены существующие здания и нарисован мир фантазий.
ForstEK (2019-05-17 12:42:45+00:00): Hi, SergeYouem! This object https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/328112785 should better retag as man_made=crane and crane:type=gantry_crane according proposal (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aman_made%3Dcrane)
Monitor (2015-02-18 06:38:14+00:00): Когда Вы хотите добавить название улицы, не нужно рисовать новую дорогу. Можно на существующую поставить тег name=* . Сейчас у Вас две дороги перекрывают друг друга, это может привести к непредсказуемому построению маршрута навигаторами.
Peilscheibe (2015-04-09 11:15:48+00:00): Was ist denn der Grund für das downgrade von rwn auf lwn? Stuttgart-Magstadt kann man doch locker als regional betrachten, das ist eine andere Größenordnung als der Rundweg im Stadtwald oder eine kurze Verbindungsroute.
engster (2015-04-10 06:33:04+00:00): Habe mich bzgl rwn/lwn an die Definition im Wiki gehalten (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hiking):
lwn = Länge < 50 km
rwn = Länge 50 - 200 km
Über die Punkte "in einem Landkreise bleiben" bzw. "mehrere Landkreise/Kantone durchwandern" lässt sich durchaus diskutieren.
Gemäß der Definitin des Schwäbischen Albvereins sind die Roten und Blauen Kreuze (im Ober- und Unterland) "Nebenwege zweiter Ordnung" (aus der Arbeitshilfe für Wegwarte).
Habe mich zudem noch versucht, an den anderen Wegen gleicher Kategorie zu orientieren, ein klares Schema ist hier aber nicht wirklich gegeben, zudem die Verwendung der Wegzeichen seitens des Albvereins in der Region Stuttgart nicht immer seinen eigenen Richtlinien entspricht.
Der Weg ist auch noch nicht fertig: es fehlen noch ein paar Stücke und ein abschließender Survey/Approval steht auch noch aus.
kayle (2015-02-16 06:51:55+00:00): Ahoj, na úvod vitaj v OSM. Ako prvé ťa poprosím píš názvy (popis) na konci editovania. Lepšie sa v tom potom aj iný človek vyzná čo sa mení/upravuje. Tiež pozor pri spájaní. V tejto úprave, si vytvoril reláciu z dvoch budov (čo nebola chyba), ale spojil si pritom aj tagy budov, ktoré nie sú rovnaké (kontrétne v tomto prípade adresné informácie). Vrátil som to späť.
SimonPoole (2018-03-18 20:24:49+00:00): Hallo S-S, eine Frage: in diesem Changeset hast du motor_vehicle=no gesetzt, was doch sehr unwahrscheinlich scheint, ist das nicht eher motor_vehicle=destination?
S-S (2018-03-19 07:13:15+00:00): Hallo SimonPoole,
da hast du recht, die Zufahrt für Anwohner ist natürlich erlaubt. Ich werde das auf motor_vehicle=destination setzen.
Beste Grüsse
S-S
SimonPoole (2018-03-19 07:58:39+00:00): Danke :-)
pmfsousa (2015-02-14 10:07:12+00:00): Closed road
pmfsousa (2015-02-14 10:06:23+00:00): one way street
VikDD (2015-02-16 10:24:42+00:00): Дорога с Московского шоссе действительно перекрыта? И мост на развязке - тоже?
Alexey_ND (2015-02-16 10:33:31+00:00): Да-да, в субботу своими глазами видел. Закрыты съезды, на мосту ремонт. Ул. Беляева - пробки, около Колхозной вообще коллапс.
jotpe (2015-02-15 00:54:01+00:00): Du hast glaub ich die administrative Grenze mit der Brücke verklebt. Johannes
Rogehm (2015-02-15 13:34:06+00:00): Joah. Da ist mir die Grenze zu nahe gekommen. Behoben. Aber das power-tagging der Brücke ist noch nicht fertig und in Diskussion. Danke.
sabas88 (2015-02-14 14:46:15+00:00): Più che cancellarlo, potevi lasciarlo e mettere la recinzione (o cancello che sia) dove si interrompe, così si sa che c'è ma che è chiuso http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier
amnmalik (2020-12-21 19:58:05+00:00): There doesn't seem to be an airport here
Nirab Pudasaini (2015-03-17 13:09:26+00:00): Wow, you traced a district boundary from an SVG image. Nice work.
4rch (2015-03-18 15:59:12+00:00): Thanks, I've used the PicLayer Plugin in JOSM for tracing: http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Plugin/PicLayer
SomeoneElse (2015-02-27 23:44:16+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I notice that you've added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3349808775 , but haven't added a tag to say what sort ot thing it is (shop, office, that sort of thing).  I'm guessing from the website some sort of shop, or (if not really a shop) perhaps industrial=warehouse ?  If you want to look at the other tags that people have used for shops, you can look at http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/shop#values .
robert (2015-02-14 13:04:14+00:00): You haven't added any tags to these lines, so OSM doesn't "know" what they are. They could be fences, rivers, train lines, anything. They also go over existing roads, so I'm not sure what you're trying to add here.
jrheath (2015-02-14 16:12:44+00:00): I've not worked out how to add routes with this program, so assumed it worked in a similar way to cycleroute.org. 
I have also been unable to correct what I entered. I could give a series of grid references or else routes using cycleroute.org if either of them are of use.