piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-14 15:57:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/759905393/history - in case that you are still visiting this area sometmes - is it just a pharmacy? Or somehow differs from regular pharmacy?

If it is not a pharmacy - would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmedical_supply describe it well?

If it is just a pharmacy - let me know and I will fix tagging here
aharvey (2018-04-29 11:52:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47120845 are you sure that's the right name of the school? The NSW Public Schools data says it is "Glenbrook Public School", same as the LPI Base Map
JLZIMMERMANN (2022-08-14 11:01:29+00:00): Bonjour Alain,
Pourquoi ce nom : Maison d'enfant (refuge benoit) ?
dadavid (2022-02-16 11:46:06+00:00): Hallo heilbron,

ist hier im Waldfriedhof wirklich noch ein weiterer Friedhof ohne Namen mit einzigem tag landuse=cemetery ? (osm.org/way/240512780)

Danke und viele Grüße
David
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:08:51+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240518273
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:39:38+00:00): Removed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53856086
SomeoneElse (2015-06-08 12:06:43+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2482524757/history has an odd layer tag on it "0;1".  Maybe you were trying to say that Boyes has a ground floor and a first floor part?  If so, I suspect http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:levels or one of the pages linked from there may help (or maybe ask at help.osm.org).
reified (2025-04-30 15:10:52+00:00): Если вернётесь в проект, пожалуйста, расставляйте дороги аккуратнее, либо займитесь чем-нибудь типа озёр или лесов. Отклонение от реальных координат на отдельных участках до 350 метров (!), по ним легко заблудиться. По большей части длины отклонение 30-100 метров. Их приходится, по сути, полностью перерисовывать.
ivanbranco (2024-05-02 14:50:53+00:00): Ciao NonnEmilia,

so che sono 10 anni fa, ma ho notato che molte specie di alberi hanno ancora una sigla come value: Jr, Fc, Pa, Ps, Ln, Sa, Sj, Jn, Oc, Pu, Rb, Fs, Sd, Rc, Mc, Si, St, Sc, Pon, Moa, Pr1, Pra, Qui, Prp, Tg4, Mg1, Pot, Quc, Li1, Fro, Pna, Poc, Pni, Mlf, Lai, Prs, Pny, Tax, Sni, Pyc, Koe, Tg3, Lir, Sau, Hib, Mel, Sab, Pnr, Prl, Sse, Mld, Prd, Pr6, Pfr, Li7, Ole, Mlp, Mls, Pai, Pap, Qup, For, Neo, Pr5, Mes, Pr8, Prv, Mg4, Pau, El1, Ker, Rph, Glt, Qus, Lid, Fry, Pma, Prc, Qua, Gim, Pte, Liq, Rac, Pa2, Os1, Rhs, Ste, Syr, Li6, Sam, Tdi, Li4, Sxt, Mlc, Ila, Pns, Tg2, Lo1, Wis, Mop, Juc, Saf, Li2, Skj, El4, Sgi, Plu, Pr7, Pnm, Sae, Sap, Sar, Pys, Qcr, Fam, Quf, Pos, Qtp, Qca, Sat, Sav, Yuc, Qurb, Moa1, Qur1, Poex, Pych, Poa1, Ros1, Glt1, Soj1, Pfr1, Sach, Pla1, Sni1, Lide, Prse, Tax2

Tu per caso sai dove trovare (se esiste) o hai ancora una tabella con le corrispondenze?

grazie e buon mapping
NonnEmilia (2024-05-02 20:11:53+00:00): Ciao Ivanbranco!

## TL;DR
Quell'import fu un errore di gioventù... Forse sarebbe addirittura meglio cancellare tutti quegli alberi singoli dal DB...

## Ricostruzione storica
All'epoca avevo trovato un dataset del Comune di Bologna con quello sterminato elenco di alberi georeferenziati e mi sembrava utile inserirli su OSM, visto che allora la mappa era molto meno sviluppata e si ricorreva agli import per popolarla rapidamente per raggiunere una "soglia critica" di utilità. Era stato fatto ad esempio con gli edifici, per aiutare il mapping post sisma Emilia 2012 (spoiler: anche quell'import col tempo si rivelò un errore...).

Non ricordo se c'era una legenda a parte o se nel dataset c'erano proprio due colonne distinte "specie" e "codice specie", fatto sta che nel mega-file che preparai per l'import ci finì il dato della colonna sbagliata... :-(

Quando mi accorsi dell'errore, dopo mesi, provai a rimediare, ma ormai avevo già buttato i file sogenti.

## Stato attuale
Ho provato a cercare nuovamente quel dataset sul portale della regione Emilia-Romagna e su quello del Comune di Bologna, ma non l'ho trovato. Sembra che abbiano caricato dei nuovi dataset parziali o aggregati, ma nessuno di quelli ha più il codice specie...

## Possibile rimedio (parziale?)
Nel dataset ["Alberi in manutenzione"](https://opendata.comune.bologna.it/explore/dataset/alberi-manutenzioni/information/) del Comune di Bologna ho visto che ci sono mappati degli alberi puntualmente e con la specie indicata. Si possono cercare le corrispondenze con quelli in OSM e ricostruire una mappatura specie/codice... Di sicuro i codici che avevo importato sono coerenti per cui se ad esempio si trova il valore giusto per "Jr" poi si può fare una ricerca e sostituzione precisa.

## Eliminazione?
Mi sembra di ricordare che in lista talk-it c'era stata più di una discussione sull'utilità di avere in OSM così tanti alberi censiti puntualmente data la difficoltà di tenerli sembre aggiornati. Che non valga la pena semplicemente eliminarli?
ivanbranco (2024-05-02 20:23:02+00:00): Io sarei per tenerli, alcuni si possono fixare utilizzando species:it come riferimento, per quelli rimanenti si può sempre cancellare la sigla
NonnEmilia (2024-05-03 07:48:40+00:00): Ok, dato che avevo popolato species:it in accordo con il codice che poi è finito in species ci si può basare anche su species:it.

L'elenco che hai fatto sopra è già un'estrapolazione completa? Potrei rifare una tabella di conversione.
ivanbranco (2024-05-03 07:54:34+00:00): L'elenco fatto sopra è un'estrazione .csv fatta con Overpass di tutti i valori ancora presenti nel database.
Alvarado2510 (2019-04-20 02:39:00+00:00): Buenas noches, existe un duplicado de Gasparillo en Soloy, necesitamos saber si existe 2 lugares en este corregimiento, con el mismo nombre, agradezco su apoyo, para eliminar uno de ellos, de no ser positiva su repuesta, gracias.
alegiova94 (2019-07-09 16:51:10+00:00): Ha cambiato sede e si trova in via Garibaldi 3
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-19 20:18:44+00:00): O co chodzi z tym "fixme2=unknown style 5_1"? Np w http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240572129/history

Jak to należy poprawić?

A może po prostu te fixme2 można spokojnie skasować?
tomhukins (2015-10-05 12:54:14+00:00): I assume the Cath Kidston shop has "operator=Barclays Bank PLC" accidentally set from its previous use as a bank:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/911842270/history

Do you have any objection to removing this tag?
kacperpawlowski (2024-08-19 11:27:02+00:00): nice
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-25 21:00:26+00:00): Please fix these fake barriers. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240637417
HaPe-CZ (2021-02-12 10:22:09+00:00): To je nějaká zmatená značka na křížení komunikací. Tam je místo zastavení vozidel nebo tam stojí semafor uprostřed přechodu a jízdního pruhu?
aceman444 (2021-02-17 00:48:32+00:00): Ktory bod myslite?
HaPe-CZ (2021-02-17 09:08:34+00:00): naproti je Smart Lékárna
aceman444 (2021-02-17 11:57:17+00:00): Nie je mi jasne, preco sa pytate na 7 rokov staru zmenu, ale nevidim nic chybne. Ano na tom priechode pre chodcov je semafor pre chodcov (nie je auta) a to ze sa znaci na spolocny bod cesty a chodnika (priechodu) je spravne: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:highway%3Dcrossing. Verim tomu, ze ten svojsky editor iD Vas navadza urobit nieco ine, v priechodoch pre chodcov ma tiez svoje divne predstavy.
anderfo (2024-05-06 12:22:15+00:00): Hi,
for way 240662661 (which you created in this changeset, about 10 years ago) and its nearby segments which probably stem from the same original way, I struggle to understand what mtb:scale=1; 0 means. 
The tag has been like this for 10 years but does not make sense.

Can you clarify?

Please have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale and reconsider the use of this tag.

Could it be that you have tried to merge several trails that had different values for mtb:scale, and the program (JOSM in this case) has merged those? That is a bad idea :) 

I hope you can figure out how to set mtb:scale for the various parts of the trail.

Cheers
opendcc (2019-01-26 09:09:43+00:00): Laut https://www.bahnausbau-muenchen.de/projekt.html?PID=47 ist die Walpertskirchener Spange eingleisig. In OSM sind zwei Trassen drin. Machst Du oder soll ich?
marcoSt (2019-01-26 11:44:55+00:00): Hab ich schon gelöscht. Ich hab damals gedacht, die wird auch zweigleisig, wie die Neufahrner Kurve usw. Was schon über 5 Jahre drin? Wo ist denn bloß die Zeit geblieben? Unglaublich.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-04-16 19:29:58+00:00): Moin thal1982,

hier hast Du ein Graben (barrier=ditch) gemappt, aber als Notiz dazugeschrieben, dass es sich um ein Holzzaun handelt. Wäre dann barrier=fence nicht besser?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
thal1982 (2023-04-17 18:37:36+00:00): Müsste jetzt richtig sein.
OSM_RogerWilco (2023-04-17 19:13:10+00:00): Perfekt, danke! :-)
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-31 21:04:50+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1411672 ?
tuxayo (2017-06-14 21:15:37+00:00): Doublon du nom de la place: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1030404
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-06-17 07:41:39+00:00): Hi QuangNguyen@TMA

I updated the connection for this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237500418 based on Maxar Premium Imagery Beta. I also added 1 new segment to make the road looks good with your data. thank you...
PT-53 (2022-09-04 05:38:53+00:00): Hallo q_un_go,
diese Linie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/240820276/history
hat (noch?) keine Merkmale.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Grüße
q_un_go (2022-09-05 10:06:13+00:00): Dürfte wohl bei der Umstellung von Relationen bei Landuse auf normale Polygone übrig geblieben sein.
Ich guck mir das mal bei Gelegenheit an.
MiroJanosik (2023-05-27 17:27:11+00:00): Ahoj, prosim ta, odkial sa vzal nazov Jánska?
Podla tabule na budove by to malo byt Kollárovo námestie.
aceman444 (2023-05-29 15:15:29+00:00): Ano podla tejto sady zmien, to vyzera, ze som nazov pridal ja. Je dost mozne, ze pred 10 rokmi tam ten nazov na tabuli bol.
Pytaju sa na to aj napr. v https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2375455 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2376155 .
Takyto nazov ulice sa este v roku 2018 nachadzal napr. v zozname https://bratislava.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/Dokumenty/Zoznam%20komunik%C3%A1ci%C3%AD%20na%20%C3%BAzem%C3%AD%20hlavn%C3%A9ho%20mesta%20SR%20Bratislavy.pdf, https://www.staremesto.sk/sk/proceduralcuttings/index/street:1390/section:citizen , dodnes je aj na https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoznam_ul%C3%ADc_v_Bratislave , https://www.odkazprestarostu.sk/bratislava/podnety/ulica/102/janska , http://psc.svetnet.sk/ulica/ulica-janska . Mozno je to nejaky historicky pozostatok nazvu a ulica uz nema ziadne priradene adresy, ale nemam dokazy na to, ze uz neexistuje. Viete o niecom?
aceman444 (2023-05-29 15:53:05+00:00): Aj v sucasnom ZBGISe https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster?pos=48.150213,17.112705,18 pri pouziti mapy Kataster nehnutelnosti (ruzova ikona) a nasledne prepinani vrstvy podkladovej vrstvy ZBGIS tam nazov "Janska" preblikne podobne ako na inych uliciach. Po nacitani udajov uz nazov nevidno, na tejto ulici akosi ziadny nazov nie je, na rozdiel od okolitych, kde sa explicitne vykresluje.
MiroJanosik (2023-05-31 21:37:04+00:00): Ahoj, neviem, v detailoch katastra sa nevyznám. Iba som sa snažil verifikovať na mieste tie dve spomenute Notes. 
Ako aj píšem v https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2376155 - ulica má na hornom aj dolnom konci na budovách tabuľku "Kollárovo námestie", preto by som navrhoval jej premenovanie v mape na "Kollárovo námestie".
aceman444 (2023-06-02 10:02:19+00:00): Chapem, ale ze tam nie je tabula este neznamena, ze sa to tak nevola. Bolo by to sice dost atypicke, aby cez namestie isla ulica s inym nazvom, ale vselico sa deje.

Mozno by historiu nazvu vedel preverit Dodko, aj ked bez adries nebude ulica zrejme ani v registri adries.
Dodko (2023-06-03 14:31:09+00:00): Bratislava-Staré Mesto má v registri adries ulicu Kollárovo námestie tá bola premenovaná 12.5.2016 z názvu Kollárovo nám.
Ulica Jánska nikdy nebola zapísaná v registri adries.
Južná budova univerzity má adresu Kollárovo námestie 9.
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/14459420?pos=48.150203,17.112878,18
aceman444 (2023-06-09 12:38:57+00:00): Ano, ako som predpokladal. Ak ulica zanikla v minulosti, alebo ani dnes nema ziadne adresy, v registri adries po nej nemusi byt ani stopa.
Nepoznate nejaky zdroj kde by sa to dalo najst? Mame aj nejaky zdroj, kde napr. su zakreslene geometrie ulic, tam by existovat mohla (ak teda existuje).
Dodko (2023-06-10 10:53:00+00:00): Jánsku do registra adries nikdy nezapísali
https://paste.pics/OGG0B
Cestné úseky https://data.gov.sk/dataset/register-adries-register-geodata preberajú ulice tiež z registra adries.
Jose Riha (2025-02-20 14:14:11+00:00): Je teda mozne v OSM tuto ulicu premenovat naspat na Kollarovo nam.? Bol som minuly tyzden preverit a nic s nazvom Janska som nenasiel.
MiroJanosik (2025-02-20 15:08:52+00:00): Podla mna rozhodne ano, ak je na mieste tabulka Kollarovo na zaciatku aj na konci tak nie je o com.
aceman444 (2025-02-24 09:02:39+00:00): Este v roku 2024 je uvedena v oficialnom zozname ulic Bratislavy: https://cdn-api.bratislava.sk/strapi-homepage/upload/Zoznam_pozemnych_komunikacii_BA_februar_2024_246ac04549.pdf .
Ale ma specialny status "zaniknuta" ako jedina v celom zozname. Takze asi sa uz blizime k rieseniu tejto zahady. Ale kedze odkazy na tento nazov ulice existuju, minimalne by sme nazov mali nechat v old_name.
Jose Riha (2025-02-24 09:20:08+00:00): Dakujem vsetkym za prispevky, premenoval som to na Kollarovo namestie v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/162882725
aceman444 (2025-02-24 09:30:37+00:00): Dakujem.
SomeoneElse (2018-08-08 14:43:25+00:00): Hello,
is there any reason why Farmfoods here has "designation=Bridlington" on it?
Best Regards,
Andy
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-05-26 14:47:50+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=594297#p594297
Владимир К (2016-02-13 08:13:38+00:00): почему в name в спорт центру стоит дублирующий адрес?
opendcc (2016-01-22 17:06:09+00:00): Nördlich von München muß es ganz schön stürmisch sein, wenn die Gebäude so windschief werden :-)
vuxi (2016-01-22 17:12:10+00:00): Liegt in der Gegend eher an den tieffliegenden Flugzeugen
opendcc (2016-01-22 17:33:23+00:00): Gute Replik! Trotzdem wäre es schön, wenn Du die Häuser rechtwinklig machen würdest. Ich bin da durch Zufall drübergestolpert ... und es sah bäh aus. Ist ja schließlich eine Karte. Und wenn OSM erfolgreich sein will, dann braucht es auch ein bischen Qualität.
GerdP (2015-10-25 09:32:07+00:00): please review:
I've changed highway=advance_stop_line
to highway=stop on two nodes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34855838
skyper (2019-12-19 15:17:10+00:00): cycleway=asl would have been the correct change.

Fixed already.
voschix (2022-05-18 08:40:44+00:00): Ciao Giuseppe, in questo changeset hai inserito un edificio con building:level=1. Dovrebbe essere buildng:levels=1
Ci sono altri tuoi edit con lo stesso errore.
Volker
Владимир К (2016-08-23 07:45:38+00:00): адреса в сквере лимаева действительно такие, через сквер даются? потому что в фиасе такого нет.
makssbaks (2016-08-23 07:49:49+00:00): да
LUX club (2020-01-22 13:09:21+00:00): Le Lux Notorious Club 199 ROUTE DE LILLE 62218 LOISON SOUS LENS
trial (2017-10-19 19:20:27+00:00): bonjour, si la rue n'a pas de nom, il ne faut pas mettre de nom (name=...) mais noname=yes, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:noname
ff5722 (2016-12-07 16:27:55+00:00): Hi, can you explain this relation?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3253394

Seems to me like the reason for this road is exactly to allow U-turns
Irma IRM-ED (2021-05-07 01:01:49+00:00): Hello AlaskaDave, please check coordinate 18.8055836, 99.642232
It looks like there are buildings on the road, so you can add the tag: bridge = yes
Irma IRM-ED (2021-05-07 01:02:53+00:00): Hello AlaskaDave, please check coordinate 18.8055836, 99.642232
It looks like there are buildings on the road, so you can add the tag: layer=1
AlaskaDave (2021-05-07 02:07:44+00:00): I looked at that location but can see no buildings.
Can you help me understand your comment better?
Endres Pelka (2017-01-05 18:07:13+00:00): Co to za rola "Bezpośrednio przy trasie" w relacji DW 719? Rewertuję ten agencjowo-reklamowy iDiotyzm.
anderfo (2016-09-27 08:30:53+00:00): Hei, 
ser du satte bicycle=no på en sti her. 
Er det virkelig forbudt å sykle der, eller har du misforstått taggen?
Access-tagger som bicycle, horse og foot blir dessverre ofte misforstått og brukt som "anbefaling" for disse framkomstmidlene, men taggene skal kun brukes for å fortelle om det er lov eller forbudt å gå/sykle/ri/osv.
Hvis du ønsker å fortelle om det er egnet med sykkel her, må du istedet bruke class:bicycle eller class:bicycle:mtb (men da bør du først lese deg opp på hvordan de brukes). 
Forøvrig gå det an å ta en titt her: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Mountain_biking

Anders
othomass (2016-09-27 09:22:38+00:00): Takk for info. Jeg tror det er et feil tastetrykk fra min side
anderfo (2016-09-27 09:56:19+00:00): Den er grei! Da fjernet jeg disse taggene.
mariotomo (2019-09-03 22:44:51+00:00): hola.  qué quiere decir el 'foot=no' asociado al 'barrier=wall'?  no lo entiendo.  por lo general, 'foot=yes' se le pone a una calle o carretera con acceso restringido, para indicar que si bien no se puede entrar en carro, sí está permitido a pié.
dpolovinkin (2023-08-17 13:37:54+00:00): hi!
way 241153678 - is is really the park?
thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-17 20:10:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2489042436/history - have you meant shop=watches here?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dwatches
Dino Michelini (2016-09-15 09:28:07+00:00): La piscina comunale di Manziana (RM) non è un palazzo isolato come è disegnato ma si trova sotto gli spalti dello stadio comunale, peraltro ben visibili dalle immagini di bing
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-01-30 09:30:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2489308168 - are you sure that this data was accurate enough to import? I am unable to locate this cemetery on aerial images.
I-76 (2024-04-22 18:55:29+00:00): Whatever the hell you did here, it was vandalism to the map. To do things like this, try OpenGeoFiction.
Arma IRM-ED (2020-10-07 09:41:14+00:00): Hi,  AnhLongVN. I have adjusted the secondary road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/241250470) based on Maxar Premium Imagery
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2020-08-10 02:00:36+00:00): Hi Kenoz, 
I've changed the road classification (way 241252458) and adjusted it based on Maxar Premium Imagery geometry. 
thank you
GerdP (2015-11-02 16:31:24+00:00): bitte mal prüfen, das scheint mir eher
ein deutlich kleineres Gebäude mit großem Dachüberhang zu sein 
Man erkennt jedenfalls nicht, bis wo der 
Parkplatz reicht.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241259766
georf (2015-11-05 08:28:08+00:00): Du kannst es gerne Ändern. Bin schon seit über einem Jahr nicht mehr in Kühlungsborn gewesen und komme in der nächsten Zukunft auch nicht hin.
GerdP (2015-11-05 08:31:50+00:00): okay, dann hat sich das erledigt. Ich habe
dort einen Fehler korrigiert und ein paar Strassen ergänzt und da ist mir das aufgefallen. Ich kann es auf den Luftbildern nicht gut erkennen
und dachte, Du bist vielleicht vor Ort.
Nicht wichtig genug für eine Reise ;-)
eggie (2018-06-16 20:38:53+00:00): Met flinke tussenpozen aan het mappen geweest en buiten Nederland begonnen. 
Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
GerdP (2015-10-28 15:39:56+00:00): please review:
I've changed two ways with the 
rarely used tag highway=old_service
to abandoned:highway=service
way 241269355 and 235298688
30303020 (2017-12-23 23:57:59+00:00): Hey,
wie konntest du mit Bing sehen, dass die Zufahrtsstraße gesperrt ist? Ist das ein Fehler? (vgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/546877)
marc__marc (2020-10-14 14:19:41+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2490638700
What is it? A cap at the end of the pipeline because the pipeline doesn't go any further? a shut-off valve? an inspection plug? something else?
I ask this question because the tag class=* was used to describe the importance of a road,
to describe pipelines, the page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline describes several possible cases pipeline=valve inspection_gauge=yes

Regards,
Marc
SomeoneElse (2017-06-14 15:46:34+00:00): Hi,
On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42966910/history you've added a wikipedia link from a 707 parked at Hamburg to the wikipedia page for Boeing 707s in general.  This doesn't make a lot of sense.  If there's a wikipedia page for this specific example of a 707, then of course it would make sense to add the link to that.
Best Regards,
Andy
robgeb (2017-07-13 11:20:09+00:00): I agree.
Best Regards, 
robgeb
SomeoneElse (2017-07-13 11:34:22+00:00): OK, are you going to revert this, or would you like me to?
eggie (2020-04-28 15:37:16+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit onze welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
borovac (2021-03-30 07:16:07+00:00): Hi hugoelectric100,

I saw your way (-32.7045638, -71.1680496) on this changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241510004, that has geometry without tags.

I wonder if you accidentally forgot or were not sure if it was the way or something else.

Regards,

borovac
Peter Dobratz (2015-06-09 19:23:15+00:00): I've deleted this from 11435 Sprite Way in Oregon City as it appears that you are no longer operating out of this location.
eteb3 (2024-07-30 14:54:38+00:00): Hi, You added the trig point at Crug Mawr with height 558. 

Do you remember your source for that figure? Thanks.
robbieonsea (2024-12-01 15:12:35+00:00): It was readings from a GPS device / saved waypoints/tracklog. I see you have moved the subsequently added 'peak' (i.e. not necessarily much prominence in my opinion) that was by another user. The height readings from OS 1:25K 1st Series, albeit in feet are probably more accurate, although my reading aren't too different.
One could/should combine the peak + trig point into one node.
eteb3 (2024-12-01 19:55:06+00:00): Thanks, I've made those changes.
Johnny Mapperseed (2016-02-15 22:13:57+00:00): Do you have permission to use OSUmaps Data? What is it licensed under?
Graf Westerholt (2016-12-15 08:54:17+00:00): Warum wurde hier ele=2 gesetzt?

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ele
user_468299 (2016-09-30 17:55:02+00:00): Hallo Jan,

der JOSM-Prüfer meldet mir beim Node 2492322481: "Unverbundener Punkt ohne physische Merkmale - Hat Schlüssel "note", "comment" oder "description""
Der note-Wert entrNcw sagt mir auch nichts. Was hast Du damit gemeint und wie wollen wir mit der JOSM-Warnung umgehen?

Viele Grüße

Sven
Lübeck (2016-10-03 16:32:42+00:00): Moin!
kann mich an das Originalobjekt nicht mehr erinnern und deshalb gelöscht!
Jan
user_5359 (2022-03-23 18:25:56+00:00): Hallo! Bitte sieh Dir mal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241642359/history an. Was ist die Bedeutung von den Schlüsseln
_bez_5107_ 	Mitte
_dok_5000_ 	00000042
_hn_5117_ 	21
_objectid_ 	42
_ot_5109_ 	Ostertor
_sta_5100_ 	Bremen
_stdtt_5108_ 	Mitte
_str_5116_ 	Adlerstraße
?
nkbre (2022-03-23 20:18:44+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Da ist mir der Fehler passiert, die Attribute aus dem Shape vom LfD nicht zu löschen. wird erledigt.
Sanderd17 (2016-01-24 15:20:31+00:00): Hi, could you please explain why you included so many living streets in the import?

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_imports/Enugu_streets_import for the discussion.
mikelmaron (2016-01-25 01:19:10+00:00): My role in the import was to make some repairs to another user's import. My understanding is that they used "living_street" in cases of unpaved residential roads, because there was a great amount of activity on these roads, and therefore resembled living streets in the EU. There is no legal definition of living street in Nigeria. At the time of the import, I didn't totally agree with the classification, but didn't think it important. 

Given the question on the classification, I think it's best to improve this, and will do so, by changing classification to residential road.