piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2021-02-05 15:21:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 98776584 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98709249].
iWowik (2021-07-10 08:37:37+00:00): Тут 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1875099112
oktmo:user совпал с 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/360001435
Noro Hibu (2021-07-18 10:04:56+00:00): Поправил ОКТМО и статус у всех трёх Жилино.
iWowik (2021-07-19 17:01:19+00:00): А сколько живу, так и не могу понять, как 2 околозеленоградских Жилино отличить по ОКТМО
iWowik (2021-07-19 17:01:44+00:00): В том смысле, что где который.
Noro Hibu (2021-07-19 21:54:16+00:00): Каталог географических названий с координатами помогает. Сейчас у всех трёх НП разные статусы.
iWowik (2021-07-20 22:53:42+00:00): Так они может не верно поставлены.
Бывший посёлок Старых Большевиков с чего-то стал деревней.
Но идея понятна.

Проверил на кадастре. 
Там бардак. И там, и там деревня.
Но случился вдруг и посёлок Жилино там, где Большевики.

Так что похоже, что надо менять местами.
Noro Hibu (2021-07-22 11:16:14+00:00): В таком случае только напрямую обращаться в администрацию каждого НП и там спрашивать к каким ОКТМО номерам они привязаны.
mavl (2021-02-04 14:27:49+00:00): Здравствуйте, pankaten.  
Это пакет правок изменил название школы со "Школа №6" на "Епархиальная школа №6". Эта школа действительно была переименована?  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
mavl (2021-02-05 15:17:26+00:00): Если нет хорошей причины для смены названия школы, то предлагаю вернуть прежнее название (также это касается и других объектов).
timmito (2021-02-08 13:58:41+00:00): Hallo AlexJ, es wäre schön, wenn dort überall und zu allen Zeiten Tempo 30 gelten würde. Nach dem Kreisel gilt Tempo 30 nur in Fahrtrichtung Glashütten, dies war bereits durch maxspeed:backward=30 eingetragen. Ab der Altkönigstraße gilt Tempo 30 nur zwischen 22 und 6 Uhr, dies war bereits durch maxspeed:conditional=30 @ (22:00-06:00) attributiert. Zu den Maßnahmen siehe auch die heutige Pressemitteilung des Regierungspräsidiums Darmstadt: https://rp-darmstadt.hessen.de/pressemitteilungen/rp-schon-fast-100-tempolimits-aus-l%C3%A4rmschutzgr%C3%BCnden Zu den Attributen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:maxspeed
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
BCNorwich (2021-02-14 12:25:38+00:00): Hi, Way: 903810331 doesn't look like a building and doesn't even match the ground area on Bing imagery, (the imagery may not be true and you may have ground-truth survey data, if so I apologise). The area looks to me like an area of horticulture with possible polytunnels that can be erected over linear areas as needed. Could you check please.
Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-02-14 12:34:35+00:00): Hi, Has the building Way: 903810332 been extended to cover this area?
regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
osmviborg (2021-02-04 14:42:23+00:00): Hej. Adresse- punkterne er fredet. Aldrig flytte/rette/slette dem.
osmviborg (2021-02-04 14:48:34+00:00): Når du tegner en vej så husk at hæfte den på en anden vej, her Ejlstrupvej. Rettet.
ivanbranco (2021-02-06 10:11:44+00:00): Ciao fede6615,

hai creato un landuse enorme chiamato SANTA CORNELIA tutto in maiuscolo che non mi sembra accurato, in quanto gran parte del poligono sono in realtà campi agricoli a quanto si può vedere dalle immagini aeree.
fede6615 (2021-02-06 10:21:20+00:00): Sono della zona e so che quello è il quartiere "Santa Cornelia" Che include campi e case (Via Volongo, Via castelleone, centri abitati vari) Inoltre come puoi notare ho anche messo i campi giusto ieri, li stavo ancora finendo.
ivanbranco (2021-02-06 10:29:29+00:00): Allora mi sa che ciò che stai cercando sono i tag place: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:place
Landuse viene utilizzato per descrivere la destinazione d'uso di aree e terreni.
Per convenzione i nomi non vanno tutti in maiuscolo.
fede6615 (2021-02-06 10:49:03+00:00): *Credo* di aver risolto mettendo il tag "Admin Level 11" (Riferito alle zone urbanistiche) con il codice 20I, che il codice della zona urbanistica Santa Cornelia, può andare?
ivanbranco (2021-02-06 11:06:25+00:00): Non sono un esperto mappatore di place, ma posso dirti che
admin_level 11=20I
è sicuramente errato in quanto dovrebbe essere
admin_level=11
ref=20I

Come detto non sono pratico, nè di place nè di Roma, quindi prendili solo come consigli, ma io mi ispirerei ad un altra zona urbanistica di Roma, per esempio questa è dello stesso Municipio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5473380

quindi qualcosa del genere:
name=Santa Cornelia
place=(inserisci quello piu' adatto secondo le tue conoscenze)
ref=20I
wikipedia=it:Santa Cornelia
population=9042

Magari qualcuno di piu' esperto può indirizzarci meglio.
yadathot (2021-02-04 14:29:37+00:00): Edited as per Amazon Private Imagery.
4004 (2021-02-08 00:47:47+00:00): никода не понимал, зачем там этот магазин, если часы работы те же
Rico557 (2021-02-10 12:54:01+00:00): он для определённой публики)))

соседнюю точку перевёл в конвиниенс
4004 (2021-02-10 13:55:00+00:00): да, пожалуй я был слишком оптимистичен на счет их расширения 3 года назад
osmviborg (2021-02-04 14:49:48+00:00): Undlad at give en bygning navn, med mindre den rest faktisk bærer et specifikt navn. Rettet.
ivanbranco (2021-02-06 10:13:10+00:00): Ciao fede6615,

con questa way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591129190 cosa volevi indicare con il tag Costruzione.stop=yes?
dgitto (2021-02-05 05:20:41+00:00): Calma, stai creando strade sovrapposte.
Poi non scrivere "Galleria senza nome", nel tag NAME ci va solo il nome della strada, e basta
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
dgitto (2021-02-05 05:24:17+00:00): Visto che abiti qui, conoscerai i nomi delle strade, dunque non usare abbreviazioni.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade
MATTEO BERTOLDO (2021-02-07 17:58:21+00:00): Si, ho fatto un gran casino.
Comunque per il fatto delle abbreviazioni, il nome di questa via è sbagliato, infatti nel cartello c'è letteralmente scritto: Vicolo Abate G. della Piazza, innanzitutto della è scritto con la lettera minuscola e sembra una preposizione, ma ancor più grave il fatto che il personaggio che si vuol commemorare si chiama Dalla Piazza, con la A e non con la E !

Per di più il nome della via è talmente lungo che i corrieri non lo leggono tutto
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-16 10:54:01+00:00): Transformé en conteneur de recyclage, je suppose que cela corespond mieux :)
Vinber-Pro (2021-05-21 09:36:15+00:00): Bonjour,
je trouve ce node en doublon, je supprime le noeud au profit de la surface.
Bonne journée
Vincent
dieterdreist (2021-02-10 23:30:11+00:00): ci sarà un motivo per la cancellazione di 143 nodi ed un percorso in versione 4 che vorresti spiegare?
fede6615 (2021-02-17 22:55:45+00:00): il percorso era solo una specie di "Contorno" Della zona abitata via di Valle Muricana, non esiste veramente. Magari poteva essere una zona ad uso residenziale, ma l'area è già stata fatta, quindi mi sembrava inutile mantenere essa modifica.
fede6615 (2021-02-17 23:00:00+00:00): perchè hai aggiunto "Possible vandalism" Sono solo un principiante di openstreetmap, mica voglio cancellare tutte le strade di Roma😂😂
dieterdreist (2021-02-18 23:28:02+00:00): scusami, se non sei un vandalo allora benvenuto! Abbiamo recentemente avuto un problema con una persona che ha aggiunto qualcosa e cancellato altre cose come foreste, landuse=residential o campi agricoli, sempre usando commenti per le modifiche senza senso/non pertinenti, e ho avuto il sospetto che il tuo utente potrebbe essere la stessa persona (perché hanno bloccato l'altro account).
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-16 10:49:54+00:00): Bonjour,
à priori tu as créé un doublon de l'existant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330389956
je supprime le noeud ajouté, toujours vérifié qu'il n'y a pas déja les éléments.
à bientôt
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-05 09:32:38+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3467643 ?
DDROMAGNY (2021-03-18 10:29:24+00:00): Bonjour, D'après ce que je vois sur l'image aérienne, il me semble que ce conteneur est plutôt un point de collecte de tri. (je me trompe peut être).Dans ce cas il conviendrait de la qualifier comme "amenity=recycling), avec ajout de nom si le point en possède un (pas de nom du type "point de tri", et l'opérateur s'il est géré par un réseau spécifique que vous connaissez.On pourra préciser le type de déchet à recycler par "recycling:plastic=yes" 
La différence porte sur le fait que l'on détruise où que l'on recycle le déchet. merci ! #CDT40
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98713045
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-16 11:00:59+00:00): attention c'est agelement un doublon : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807608640
map per (2021-02-08 10:10:06+00:00): Hi Kevinsnt

"Style_néogothique" apparently is not a proper value for building=* (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:building)

Best wishes and have fun mapping
map per
user_11418917 (2021-02-04 20:25:38+00:00): Please don't add your name to the map. I've deleted your edit.
Glassman (2021-02-04 20:34:34+00:00): I appreciate your efforts to add NHD streams to OSM. Have you noticed how the streams in forested areas usually has trees around the stream. I've wonder if that is because it's hard to harvest or if it is protection for salmon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98714071
OrcaDan (2021-02-10 23:42:45+00:00): The state rules provide for a buffer around riparian zones. That is what you see with trees still standing along streams.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98714071
Puxan (2021-02-05 17:11:15+00:00): Hola @kibira. Estoy validando esta tesela del proyecto 9024 que has modificado y ampliado. Recuerda que las vías de agua (ríos y arroyos) cuando cruzan una vía terrestre (camino, carretera) deben tener un nodo común a ambos, un puente o un tunel.
map per (2021-02-08 09:49:15+00:00): Hello Kevinsnt

the leisure=park tag is wrong!

Best wishes
map per
map per (2021-02-08 09:59:37+00:00): The leisure=park tag is used differently (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark). 
I corrected the "Golf von Biskaya" and changed the Tags back to natural=bay.

And concerning the Skatepark de La Faute-sur-Mer: If that is a site where one can perforem tricks on a skateboard it shold be tagged differently as well (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch#Skatepark)

Best wishes and have fun mapping
map per
map per (2021-02-08 10:04:30+00:00): Hi Kevinsnt

its me again ;). Apparently "19:00" is not a proper value for opening_hours. Take a look at the wiki for further information (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:opening_hours)

Best wishes
map per
Keima (2021-02-14 17:22:22+00:00): Hi Kevinst and map per,
Without response I deleted the opening_hours=19:00". Kevinst, I let you add again the correct span of opening hours.
Colin Smale (2021-02-04 21:50:41+00:00): Hi! What do the ref=* values on the rail tracks represent? Which authority issues and administers these?
Vinber-Pro (2021-02-16 10:58:25+00:00): ok, mais cette boulangerie existe toujours : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3451035284#map=18/43.98004/-0.23133

J'ai repositionné la boulangerie dans le batiment et pas devant :)

à plus
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-05 08:07:49+00:00): O čia TOOOOOKIO dydžio makdonaldo pastatas? :-D
HaPe-CZ (2021-02-04 18:09:51+00:00): Mohu se zeptal co má představovat přidaná lesní plocha v Letenských sadech? Nejde o to, jestli tam je nebo není, ale o to, jak je přidaná. Vůbec to nemá logiku tam takhle plácnout nějakou plochu bez nějakého zarovnání do terénu.
Hlav (2021-02-05 09:19:27+00:00): Asi nerozumím otázce. Takže otázka nezní: "Je v určeném místě lesní plocha?" Na to bych odpověděl: je, přibližně v těch hranicích (vzrostlé stromy bych považoval za les, nevidím problém kombinovat landuse=forest a leisure=park v jiných hranicích). Nerozumím ani zmínce o zarovnání do terénu. Hranice lesa podle mě přibližně kopírují skutečné hranice, viz podklad 'IPR ortofoto Low-Vegetation (tmsproxy)'. Asi to není úplně přesné, ale já tam ty stromy vidím (leda že by je někdo mezitím vykácel).
HaPe-CZ (2021-02-05 10:00:18+00:00): Kombinovat plochu parku a lesa je určitě možné, ono to ani jinak nejde ;P. Pokud postupuješ metodou jak jsi uvedl, tak ten les je stejně špatně zakreslen, les není jen tam kde stojí kmen ale i tam kde se třeba kácí. Vykácená plocha stále patří do plochy lesa protože bude opět vysázena (pokud tam nebude zrovna parkoviště. Takto zakreslenou plochu nepovažuji za dobrou práci někoho, kdo má 10.000 bodů za úpravy. To už bych IMHO očekával lepší práci.
Hlav (2021-02-05 11:12:45+00:00): Jestli víš, že je něco zakresleno špatně, třeba kvůli tomu, že se tam kácelo, nic Ti samozřejmě nebrání editaci vylepšit. Mně připadá lepší mít v mapě les aspoň přibližně tak jak tam byl, než vůbec.
HaPe-CZ (2021-02-05 11:31:10+00:00): Aha, už to chápu. Tobě se nejedná o správnost a kvalitu mapových podkladů ale pouze o to, aby jsi měl další bodík za provedenou úpravu. Tak to potom jednáš opravdu správně podle hesla, kvalitu nahradíme kvantitou.
MarkusHD (2023-07-23 19:51:25+00:00): Ist an diesem Hinweis was dran?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3648869
ququruzka (2021-05-27 11:47:10+00:00): місце зупинки https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6272296593
має містити : 
bus=yes
public_transport=stop_position
і ніяк інакше. 
приклад : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6378366961
ququruzka (2022-01-06 13:48:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport
читаємо будь ласка документацію, щоби не було подальших ускладнень.
mweper (2021-02-04 19:04:29+00:00): Cambio revertido por no cumplir con la norma de OSM que dice: "No mapees donde viven las personas, en particular, no añadas los nombres de los habitantes de las viviendas."
Fuente: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Limitaciones_en_el_mapeo_de_informaci%C3%B3n_privada
smb1001 (2021-02-06 12:13:12+00:00): Why did you delete the wikidata tag?
ohmanger (2021-02-06 20:41:13+00:00): Sorry about that. It was pointing at an address in Merseyside, I assumed this was an error but can see it is correct now!
ohmanger (2021-02-06 20:50:12+00:00): I have added the tag back.
PCarew_EG (2022-09-02 17:19:10+00:00): The name of Hale Malama Museum Collections Storage Facility (339070746, v2) isn't present in the source, and a storage facility doesn't sound like a museum, do you have any insight on the sources used and what the name of the building is?
pitfire (2021-06-10 05:19:07+00:00): beim Namen bitte keine Gesellschaftform mit reinschreiben sondern nur den eigentlichen Namen. Gesellschaftformen können unter operator=* geschrieben werden.
Ebrahim Nejati (2021-02-04 16:46:45+00:00): دوست عزیز. شما بیش از ۲۰۰ نقطه را بدون ذکر توضیحات یا منبع ویرایش کردید. لطفا درباره ویرایش خود توضیح دهید
Strubbl (2021-02-04 18:00:47+00:00): Hi czubi,
wofür steht die 99192 als Kommentar für deine CS?
czubi (2021-02-04 18:03:18+00:00): Das ist die PLZ des Bereiches meiner vorherigen Änderung. Hab ich vergessen zu verbessern. Sorry, mein Fehler.
czubi (2021-02-04 18:06:17+00:00): Bei meinen CS Kommentaren besteht allgemein noch Luft nach oben: -(
Strubbl (2021-02-04 18:14:23+00:00): Kein Problem, danke für die Info.
Fedora_moewe (2021-02-09 23:24:40+00:00): Warum wurde diese zwei Haltestellen erstellt? Die Haltestellen waren/sind schon vorhanden.
Voidmapper (2021-02-05 13:07:19+00:00): Hartelijk dank!
Nirinkorn (2021-02-12 14:46:04+00:00): 124/5 หมู่1ต.เชิงดอย อ.ดอยสะเก็ด
muralito (2021-10-03 15:24:44+00:00): Hola.

Los limites para la relacion Ciudad Vieja con admin_level=10, ¿de donde los obtuviste?

Los limites de los barrios en Montevideo son absolutamente difusos y no oficiales. Si le preguntas a dos personas distintas probablemente te van a decir distintos limites. Mapearlos como relacion de limite no se si es la mejor opcion...

Saludos,
M.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-04 17:54:03+00:00): Jak dodajesz te budynki i adresy - to kontrolujesz ich stan i przeglądasz by wyłapać buble, które w danych urzędowych się trafiają?
Grzegorz Jablonowski (2021-02-05 05:09:23+00:00): Co do zasady to tak , choć główny nacisk na numerację by nie była zdublowana oraz zmniejszenie ostrzeżeń w Josm
user_2066394 (2021-02-05 22:23:04+00:00): Was war da falsch verwendet? War ursprünglich ein Multipolygon, um den Innenhof abzubilden. Haben die Gebäude keine Verbindung?
AndiN58 (2021-02-06 20:46:22+00:00): Die Gebäude sind getrennt.
Haus-Nr 5 ist an den Seiten zum vorderen Gebäude zwar angebaut, aber es existiert seitlich keine Verbindung zum vorderen Haus.
user_2066394 (2021-02-06 21:17:32+00:00): Verstehe, und im südlichen Teil auch keine Verbindung? Formen passen so oder mal gradziehen?
OrDal (2021-02-04 21:31:52+00:00): Hi AwesomeDude1236,
GovMap is a copyrighted source.
Do have you have permission to use it?
dgitto (2021-02-05 04:42:18+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM
dgitto (2021-02-05 05:01:48+00:00): Mi sono permesso di fare delle correzioni:
Il tag NAME si usa solo per il *nome proprio* (colosseo, villa taldeitali, ecc), non ci devi mettere descrizioni o indirizzi nel name.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
dgitto (2021-02-05 05:07:40+00:00): In Italia i numeri civici non li mettiamo come tag dell'edificio. Questo perché non vi è corrispondenza biunivoca tra edifici e indirizzi. Un grande palazzo può avere molti civici, anche su molte strade differenti,
Ovviamente nel caso di casa tua questo non avviene, ma di solito il civico si mette appunto come nodo separato, nel punto in cui si trova fisicamente il cartellino del civico, oppure come nodo sul perimetro dell'edificio.
literan (2021-02-10 09:30:05+00:00): товарищ еще и вандалит https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87246777

может, ну его?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-06-03 10:51:04+00:00): Attention: éviter d'ajouter des access=no ou des tags construction à des routes existantes. Les constructions, détours et fermetures temporaires ne devraient pas être ajoutées à osm. Cela cause des problèmes de calcul de chemin, car ces tags sont souvent oubliés et plusiuers calculs sont faits dans une optique de planification et ne devraient pas inclurer des modifications temporaires aux réseaux. Il est préférable d'utiliser des applications externes à osm qui vont gérer ces fermetures temporaires. Merci!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-06-03 10:53:33+00:00): Oups, désolé, je pensais que le tag construction avait été mis sur la rue Peel et non sur le REV! Désolé!
grouper (2021-03-21 18:26:17+00:00): This changeset and all of your other ones have fantasy mapping written all over it. You wouldn't happen to know a user named CoastalGenius would you?
Polarbear-repair (2021-03-21 22:55:42+00:00): Reverted as follows:
US: FL: Revert Fiction. DWG Ticket#2021032110000101. 
 
CS: 98719497, 98671779, 98668355, 98149401, 98149029 in CS 101456303
CS: 98148470, 93189173 in CS 101456762
CS: 93129376, 93129079 in CS 101456971
CS: 92907485 92910530, manual repairs in CS 101459803
baumann3141 (2021-02-04 18:12:43+00:00): There's no car wash here, please remove.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/98719577
SekeRob (2021-02-04 18:39:58+00:00): OK

So you need to draw a line around the whole thing. With that line selected go directly to relation and select new relation. type=building and give it the role=outer or outline (I've used outer only so far). Then you attach the 2 parts and tag them both with the role 'part', so that you end up with a relation that is 3 parts, 1 outer, 2 parts. (Not seen any sample where building:part was entered in the role field)
I don't use the building:part=* , just building=* as building:part wont render in OSM 2D standard.
The base wiki is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building
If stuck, let me know. In the meantime I've done the adjacent building with parking deck which is an identical arrangement, called the relation Sabini 70-80 (when there are many in the area it's easy to identify who's who). Then you can flip flop between the 2.
ciao e bonne chance
FinixFighter (2021-02-05 09:40:19+00:00): Ok thank you so much! I'll try as soon as I can!
stefanct (2021-02-08 05:20:50+00:00): Hallo und willkommen,
kurzes Feedback zur eurer ersten Änderung: der name-Schlüssel sollte im Allgemeinen nur verwendet werden, wenn ein Objekt einen eindeutigen Eigennamen hat. Bei Hydranten wie bei name="Hydrant Schöcklblickstraße 3" ist das eher ungewöhnlich und wohl eher eine Beschreibung, welche in description=* besser aufgehoben wäre (falls sie überhaupt notwendig ist - die ref=*-Nummer ist schon eindeutig und die Adresse ergibt sich aus der Umgebung). Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:description
Bei ref=* könnte man das "#" auch weglassen, außer es hat eine Bedeutung und/oder dient zur Unterscheidung von Hydranten, die nur eine Zahl als ID haben.
LG
LITO 75 (2021-02-04 18:24:05+00:00): intendesi ri-classificata o meglio: corretta la classificazione.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-12 00:39:43+00:00): Olá,

as restrições de conversão criadas por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12274992

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12274993

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12274994

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12274995

(Proibido retornar na mesma via / no_u_turn) são restrições sinalizadas (possuem uma placa no "mundo real" correspondente)? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar na mesma via são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction

Você poderia avaliar e, sendo o caso, excluir essas restrições?
olo81 (2021-02-09 19:15:38+00:00): do poprawy nazwa obiektu 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/796545627
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy
dvdhoven (2021-02-05 08:02:13+00:00): Ik heb rcn route 28-70 en LF4 conform de gemeentesite omgelegd via de Mandelabrug.
Wandelroutes heb ik ook omgelegd, zodat deze nu foutvrij verlopen.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
emvee (2021-02-28 12:46:41+00:00): Enkele wegen zijn na deze changeset niet meer "zichtbaar"

In plaats van disused is denk ik highway=construction een beter idee, duidelijk herkenbaar in JOSM en ook qua beschrijving wat mij betreft een betere match.

Zie ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100134987