piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Kautilya3 (2021-07-18 02:44:50+00:00): Reverted changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108046974
Kautilya3 (2021-07-18 02:45:20+00:00): Attempts to change the borders of India, by running Chinese roads into Indian territory.
Kautilya3 (2021-07-18 02:46:19+00:00): The roads marked on the Chinese side were also not visible on satellite imagery.
SGorskiy (2021-07-19 10:07:31+00:00): На каком основании вы удалили дорогу Пентеги - Новые Макшаки? Судя по космоснимкам дорога присутствует. 
Если в районе реки или водоема дорога не пригодна для проезда, но она присуствует, это не является поводом для удаления, необходимо обозначить путь через водоем как не проходимый для колесного с помощью тега smoothness. Так же обозначить брод или мост если он там есть.
DanilaTravels (2021-07-19 11:22:49+00:00): Этой дорогой больше не пользуются, она вся заросла, можно сказать ее больше нет, все ездят другой, которая ближе к лесу идет. На каком основании ее удалил? - Потому лично проверил этот маршрут. По снимкам да, показывает что есть проезд, но на деле там поле с еле читаемыми следами когда до бывшей дороги.
SGorskiy (2021-07-21 14:06:48+00:00): Хорошо. Спасибо за ответ!
Pandur17 (2021-07-17 21:25:01+00:00): https://www.aachen.de/DE/stadt_buerger/verkehr_strasse/verkehrskonzepte/Radverkehr/Rad-Vorrang-Routen/01_Ausbau/RVRBrand/index.html
drkt (2021-07-18 07:57:04+00:00): Hello again! I can see you've made a cycleway that doesn't really go anywhere. Specifically, this way
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965261133

Generally, if a sidewalk or cyclepath doesn't have any seperation from the road, such as grass, we just add it to the road itself for simplicity.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

That is what it is, but it doesn't go anywhere. It stops abrubtly at the edge of the crossing street, where it should ideally be connected to it. Routers can't use it, if it doesn't go somewhere. 

You're making good edits, though! Keep going.
Sovsigryden (2021-07-22 19:32:39+00:00): Thanks. I enjoy editing stuff like this. 
And it makes totally sense.. 
I have removed it, in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108447655
Harry Wood (2021-07-23 10:39:29+00:00): Nice one philiprowlands. I've been neglecting post box mapping. I should do a bit more in my area just to the south of here
philiprowlands (2021-07-23 10:45:40+00:00): Have you seen this site?
https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/progress/N/

I did all of N6 (good exercise) and have been working through the neighbouring areas.
Harry Wood (2021-07-23 10:50:35+00:00): Yeah exactly. I've got to tick off those N19 ones. Shame on me. Actually I've recently done a few which were *very* close to my house, but still... need to be turning it green!
Peter Newman (2021-11-09 21:31:59+00:00): Hi GME squeeze,

Is this really a glacier (as in a large ice flow), rather than an ice cream shop?

See also the discussion in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113546359
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-07-22 19:10:52+00:00): نرجوا عدم إضافة أماكن غير صحيحة
korni (2021-07-20 22:34:52+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś tagowanie, że to jest plaża naturystów?
syntex (2021-07-21 01:28:41+00:00): Myślałem, że to powielona nazwa tej plaży, która jest wyżej, poza tym to jest teraz mini wyspa patrząc na zdjęcia lotnicze z 2021 roku
businessesMan (2021-07-29 18:31:43+00:00): Moin sundew,
bei der Packstation am Netto in Hasloh habe ich gesehen, dass du dort "ref=kunigunde" als referenzID eingetragen hast, was dann ja so auch auf der Karte zu sehen ist. Stimmt das so? Das kommt mir nämlich sehr komisch vor. Auch bitte für Typ "Schrank" nächstes mal type=cabinet benutzen (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Packstation )

Grüße,
DaN0mic
sundew (2021-07-30 13:55:45+00:00): Hallo DaN0mic!

Packstationen von Amazon werden nicht wie bei DHL über eine Nummer identifiziert, sondern über einen mehrheitlich exotischen Namen. Ob dieser weltweit eineindeutig ist, wäre interessant zu wissen. Bei DHL-Packstationen sind die dreistelligen Nummern dagegen nur im jeweiligen Postgroßbereich eindeutig, d.h. hier muss eine Postleitzahl vorhanden sein. Das ref-Tag wird auch bei anderen Objekten alphanumerisch belegt, z.B. zur Referenzierung einzelner Bahn/Bussteige innerhalb eines Verkehrsknotens. "kunigunde" stand an der Packstation angeschrieben.

Was das von dir erwähnte Tag type betrifft, so ist type=Schrank die seit ewig benutzte Variante, wenn auch unglücklicherweise nicht-englisch, die nachwievor überwiegend benutzt wird. Irgendwann hat eine der überflüssigen Apps angefangen, ein eigenes englisches Tag zu erfinden, und jemand hat das undiskutiert auf der Wikiseite ergänzt - ebenso ohne an die Folgen zu denken. Und nun haben wir jetzt den Salat, dass tausende Packstationen deutschlandweit mit type=Schrank besetzt sind und nur vielleicht 15% mit der englischen Variante. Zwei Werte für ein und dasselbe, das sollte nicht so sein. Ein Massenedit um das glattzuziehen ist unzulässig, zumal jede Packstation vorher mindestens auf Fortexistenz und Stellort geprüft werden müsste. Eine flächendeckende Mapperaktion, quasi als "Wochenaufgabe" würde auch nur in Großstädten halbwegs funktionieren und bestenfalls das Verhältnis der beiden Varianten verschieben, nicht jedoch das Problem lösen. In einer Diskussion beim monatlichen Hamburger Mappertreffen (derzeit virtuell) haben wir dort letztes Jahr beschlossen, diese Umtaggung derzeit(!) nicht zu unterstützen und die bisherige Variante weiter zu nutzen!

Wenn wir schonmal dabei sind: ich würde dich bitten, beim Prüfen von Objekten, die ggf. wieder verschwinden können (Packstation, Briefkästen, Telefone), auch das check_date=* zu aktualisieren, weil das die einzig saubere Methode ist, beim Mappen zu filtern, welche Objekte andere Mapper zuletzt noch nicht begutachtet haben. Danke!

LG
businessesMan (2021-07-30 20:39:02+00:00): Okay, vielen Dank für die sehr ausführliche und informative Antwort. Check_date werde ich mir auf jeden Fall zu Herzen nehmen. Kannte ich so noch garnicht, aber ist eine super Idee :) Finde es persönlich übringens mega gut, dass du hier Briefkästen usw. updatest, weil das des Öfteren doch zu kurz kommt.
Ich wünsche dir dann noch einen angenehmen Abend, Morgen oder Mittag(je nach lesezeit ^^) und fröhliches Mappen.

Beste Grüße
Hedaja (2021-07-24 15:29:21+00:00): Hi Kevin
I think having Ophir Pass Road as highway=tertiary_link is not correct. In general _links are not meant for the whole road. They are meant for things like on and off ramps, connecting the highway with said classification to another roadway.
The highway classification in the US has been interpreted differently from most of the rest of the world and has some inconsistencies even in the documentation in the wiki.
What do you think, since this road isn't connecting settlements and probably has a minor importance in the road network, she we rather tag it as highway=unclassfied.
I found this because the bridge across Mineral creek to the north, still is tagged as highway=track which caused BRouter to throw a portential error.

Christian
kevinp2 (2021-07-24 16:12:22+00:00): Hi Christian,

No objection from me to changing the highway tag.  Someone had given the road the wrong name of Ophir Pass 4WD Trail, which is simply not reflected in any signpost or map.

Kevin
kevinp2 (2021-07-24 16:24:09+00:00): I went ahead and changed the tag to unclassified for all the segments of Ophir Pass Rd.
Hedaja (2021-07-24 16:40:03+00:00): Awesome 
Thank you very much.
Found a piece of road right at the end of the road and the bridge that still had the wrong classifiaction and did some minor realignment according to gpx and aerial images
Should be good to go now.
Happy mapping
ALu68 (2021-07-20 23:02:36+00:00): Hallo fredisz,

wenn du die public_transport=platform Daten von einem vorhandenen Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/695217815/history an einen neuen Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965269251 überträgst ist das prinzipiell in Ordnung.

Das Problem ist nur, dass in den Routen, weiterhin der jetzt "leere" Knoten als Platform und nicht der Weg enthalten ist. Dies ist in der PTNA als Fehlermeldung ersichtlich: https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-AVV-Analysis.diff.html#bus_511

Betroffen sind einige Routen der Linien 32, 511, 512 & 640.

Ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob die ÖPNV-Relationen im iD sicher bearbeitet werden können.

Gruß. Andre
ALu68 (2021-07-24 09:00:12+00:00): Korrigiert!

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108524280
letihu (2021-08-25 20:12:39+00:00): Wenn dies
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965270591/history
ein Gebäude ist, solltest du die tags nicht vergessen ;-)
Joey Samson (2021-07-18 04:44:35+00:00): Malolos boundary please
Glassman (2021-07-18 05:26:56+00:00): Instead of removing the path, add access=private. That way the path is known to search and rescue organizations. Can you fix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108175441
portalaventura (2021-07-28 22:48:58+00:00): Você reduziu indevidamente a extensão da Rua Nelson Durand. A imagem da maxar não é compativel com essa redução. Com isso você excluiu informação adicionada e verificada por mapeadores locais.

Alinhar dados não permite você reduzir o comprimento de nenhuma via.

Por gentileza corrija a extensão da rua Rua Nelson Durand.
RiverBearings (2021-07-29 03:17:43+00:00): Olá de novo, Portalaventura. Eu vejo o que você está dizendo aqui na Rua Nelson Durand, na zona sul. Vou extrair versões anteriores, corresponder a essa extensão e evitar fazer encurtamentos de extensão semelhantes no futuro. Obrigado por encontrar isso e me informar sobre isso. Saúde.

Hello again Portalaventura. I see what you are saying here on Rua Nelson Durand at the southern side. I will pull up previous versions, match to that extent and avoid doing similar extent shortening in the future. Thank you for finding this and letting me know about it. Cheers.
Asteliks (2022-01-02 15:27:44+00:00): When adding several entrances to a building could you also add the appropriate flats that can be accessed with a certain entrance (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:flats)? It would make life much easer for map users. It would be also great if you could make smaller commits instead of one that is this big.
Rogoyski (2022-01-02 20:01:38+00:00): Did you comment the right changeset? I seriously doubt I was adding any building entrances back then, I hardly ever do that and the description is clear the revision  focused on highways (roads, foot- and cycleways).

The revision indeed isn't small but I think it's limited in space to Plac Konstytucji as the description says. The larger bounding box is likely caused by one long linear feature stretching along Marszałkowska all the way to Królewska, likely either a tram track or the subway line.
Asteliks (2022-01-03 09:29:26+00:00): Pardon me. My mistake, indeed, you have not added any building entrances, you just moved it ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4012826955/history ). In this case considering your answer please disregard my comment unless you can add some entrances and flat numbers in your area.
ftcat (2021-07-28 07:33:43+00:00): Hi Daniel Specht,

Ways 965271154 and 965271155 are not bare rock but seasonal wetlands known as dambos that will be burnt in the dry season, hence the black appearance in the imagery.
Daniel Specht (2021-07-28 18:17:50+00:00): @[ftcat] any idea how I can find the tile?
ftcat (2021-07-28 19:05:11+00:00): Hi Daniel,

Sorry I don't, just came across these edits while doing edits in the Serenje area, I am a local mapper and see many errors by remote mappers who are interpreting features in the images incorrectly, trouble is dambo features appear differently depending on the time of the year and whether they have been burnt off as well, many are tagged as water bodies in error. They could be classified as wet meadows during the rains or grasslands during the dry season.

Dambos are highly important natural features in Zambia covering 12% of the land area of the country and take many forms, tourists who have visited the parks here will have come across them as waterholes or pans.
Joey Samson (2021-07-18 04:42:02+00:00): More barangay and city boundaries please
DaveF (2021-07-18 18:36:24+00:00): You're making many errors. 
Such as converting this parking aisle into a cycle path.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/963674694

Please ensure you only make edits of which you are certain & improve the quality of the map & database.
archie (2021-07-17 23:58:26+00:00): Den korrigering blev misslyckad. Om du jämför med LMs topografiska resp ortografiska, så ser du att den förutvarande kustdragningen var alldeles korrekt. Det du har ritat in nu är reedbed. Du bör nog revertera det här cs.
archie (2021-07-26 12:42:09+00:00): Hej, har du kollat upp detta? Du har ritat land, där det är vatten, som du lätt kan kolla via LM topografiska kartan t ex. Har du någon uppfattning om det här? Vill du rätta till det?
archie (2021-08-08 09:31:31+00:00): 2021-08-08 Jag ser att du är aktiv. Har du tagit ställning till min kommentar? När tänker du rätta till detta misstag?
pereric (2021-08-08 09:38:07+00:00): Hej! Menar du udden söder om Sandviken?
archie (2021-08-08 09:59:24+00:00): Udden omkring den här noden: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2696651133
pereric (2021-08-08 10:13:13+00:00): OK. När jag var där på plats uppfattade jag att det var mer land än vad OSM visade. Har du också varit ute där och kollat?
archie (2021-08-08 10:40:12+00:00): Har du jämfört med LM topo etc?
archie (2021-08-08 12:43:08+00:00): Nu har jag reverterat din cs.
pereric (2021-08-08 14:07:04+00:00): Har du reverterat POI också? Då behöver jag revertera din revertering.
MxxCon (2021-07-18 01:30:29+00:00): Hello.
Please note that parking lot aisles and driveway shouldn't be tagged with street names since they are not streets.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108176307
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-16 10:59:15+00:00): non mettere il caps-lock e note che descrivono i tag!
brigante mandrogno (2021-10-21 14:12:02+00:00): va bene, non me ne ero manco accorto, in genere non succede. calma però neh :)
alessandrocarmeli (2021-10-21 17:28:29+00:00): non l'ho detto in tono arrabbiato, tranquillo. No problem
SomeoneElse (2021-07-18 10:40:27+00:00): In here I rerouted the Millennium Way west of Fulford based on a guidepost that I found at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8929604297 .  I changed https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19wm to https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19wl .
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-07-22 11:52:34+00:00): 这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108176538
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-07-22 11:52:51+00:00): 这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108176538
user_11418917 (2021-07-22 21:33:46+00:00): @快乐的老鼠宝宝 read the comments here before judging: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108339568
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-07-26 15:36:06+00:00): Maybe my comment before is a bit reckless, so, for the correct name of this path that maybe have a religious meaning, this problem remains for Arabic mapper to solve.
andershl (2021-07-29 19:39:59+00:00): You use english names for "name". The names are Hovgaard Ø, Lynn Ø, Dijmpna Sund, Hekla Sund. Dijmphna Sund is only the part between Hovgaard and Lynn. But it is good to get names on geographical items...
andershl (2021-07-29 19:43:17+00:00): Btw: Lots of placenames here https://data.geus.dk/geusmap/?mapname=stednavnedb#baslay=&optlay=&extent=218587.77130888327,8078602.178490916,430711.47745123965,8168358.768644856&layers=grl_geus_north_east_higgins_map
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-07-22 11:53:01+00:00): 这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108176815
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-07-22 11:54:27+00:00): 这条路是确实存在的，只不过因为在沙漠中并不能很好的找到，同时名字会使人误认为这是历史上才有的道路。lockdownguy在osmcha的指控是不正确的
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108176815
user_11418917 (2021-07-22 21:33:26+00:00): @快乐的老鼠宝宝 read the comments here before judging: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108339568
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-07-26 15:36:01+00:00): Maybe my comment before is a bit reckless, so, for the correct name of this path that maybe have a religious meaning, this problem remains for Arabic mapper to solve.
gscholz (2021-07-20 04:36:42+00:00): Hi avivar,
this changeset has created several huge buildings where no buildings are visible on image data. Can you please check if you confused "building" and "landuse"?
Kind regards
Guido
gordo anorexico (2021-07-21 13:36:26+00:00): Fixed.
felipeeugenio (2025-12-13 11:28:30+00:00): Hay una ciclovía en esta edición, hecha hace 4 años, de mas de 2 kilometros, y en realidad no supera los 100 metros.
topius (2021-07-18 06:16:08+00:00): Hi. "Walking roads" should be tagged only as highway=path, not as sidewalks (those are reserved for sidewalks on the side of roads in cities).
jnighan (2021-07-18 03:53:58+00:00): **Accidentally autofilled previous changeset comment. Should be:

Comment: Improved Mashantucket Pequot boundaries and other nearby objects

Source: CT DEP Parcels; Town of N. Stonington GIS viewer
ZeLonewolf (2021-08-16 01:50:13+00:00): Thanks for mapping the Narragansett Indian reservation!  It looks like there's a misalignment between that boundary and the Francis C. Carter preserve just to the north where I'm guessing they should be adjacent.  Did you trace this boundary by hand or was there a GIS file of some kind available?
jnighan (2021-08-18 18:36:17+00:00): Hi! I used the GIS parcel polygons available through the Town of Charleston (https://charlestown.mapxpress.net/). It is the Carter Preserve that is slightly misaligned in OSM, and can be fixed using these files.
mrpulley (2025-08-13 11:34:15+00:00): Deleted attraction at changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170383543
Supaplex (2021-07-19 04:27:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965305394
圖書館建築應該沒有黏到道路吧?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108179626
Supaplex (2021-07-19 04:28:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344688320
公園也不應該黏到道路上面
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108179626
Cheng-Chi Feng (2021-07-19 05:05:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108217628
已經將與道路之連結斷開，若有遺漏請再幫忙修正，感謝！
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
smb1001 (2021-07-18 11:01:32+00:00): What's your thinking here? Adding the garden tag just makes those houses different from any other in Cambridge, but removing the residential area means that those houses no longer have a landuse and also the boundaries between them aren't visible.
BCNorwich (2021-07-18 13:33:40+00:00): I initially amended to correct self-intersections on those gardens. I corrected a few of the garden areas tagged as residential because they were totally enclosed by another residential area, making for residential enclosed by residential. You deleted Way: 793106372 landuse=residential, the polygon in Changeset #108187937 that enclosed all the houses and gardens. 

If you look a bit further you'll see that it's this area of Cambridge that's the odd one out in mapping gardens as residential areas. The vast majority of the country if not the world encloses the totality of a residential area in a larger single polygon.  In fact this is also the case for the larger part of Cambridge as well.

Regards Bernard.
smb1001 (2021-07-18 14:22:50+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me. 

The reason most places just enclose the residential area as a single polygon is because it takes to long to map the individual areas. In fact, more and more there's a movement against such areas as they tend to enclose everything else in there, parks, industrial, retail areas etc and label it all as residential. You'll note that the residential polygon I deleted was only added recently by someone replacing the "whole of North Cambridge" polygon with more accurate smaller ones.

But also I disagree that this part of Cambridge is the odd-one-out. The whole of W and NW Cambridge has been done similarly, and almost all from Arbury Road to the river.

I'll leave your garden tagging (even though I'm betting someone else will revert for consistency before long) but re-add the residential tags.
Tình ca du mục (2022-01-03 13:12:17+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=108179981 ?
Cheng-Chi Feng (2021-07-18 06:22:56+00:00): 打錯，是林地範圍修正
ivanbranco (2021-07-18 08:51:18+00:00): Ciao Aiman,

ti scrivo solo per ricordarti che "Via" va sempre scritto con l'iniziale maiuscola!
muchichka_s (2021-08-18 01:01:44+00:00): Привіт. На підставі чого видалені дороги?
До прикладу https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958385948 добре видно на супутникових фото
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108180685
osmviborg (2021-07-18 08:26:29+00:00): Hej. At hæfte veje/indkørsler til bygninger er en fejl. Når du justerer bygningernes placering (det ser fint ud her) kan du med fordel bruge 'SDFE Skærmkort' som giver dig fodaftrykket på bygningen. At bruge taget er ikke altid bedste løsning. Alle billeder er ikke tager direkte ovenfra.
aupdk (2021-07-18 11:07:08+00:00): Hej. Tak for informationen, det skal jeg gøre i fremtiden - og selvfølgelig nok rette mine fejl frem til nu
ftcat (2021-07-28 07:31:21+00:00): Hi Władysław Komorek,

Any road running along a power line in Zambia will generally be a track and used for maintenance by the national power company, ZESCO. They may appear more substantial than they are in reality due to local foot traffic that make use of them.
Władysław Komorek (2021-08-01 17:27:03+00:00): Sorry.
ftcat (2021-08-01 18:17:28+00:00): No problem, I suppose technically they should be a service road but they are used for general traffic anyway
Władysław Komorek (2021-08-01 20:08:18+00:00): I don't know Zambia. Tried doing this based on an image from Maxar Premium.
Therefore, I apologize for my mistakes and ask everyone to correct them.
Scout Jens (2022-11-30 13:20:08+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe, ich bin auf den von Dir eingetragenen Key: traffic_signals:direction gestoßen. Laut Doku gibt dieser an, für welche Richtung das Signal gilt. Das war (zumindest bei der Feuerwehrausfahrt/Ostring) genau entgegengesetzt, so dass ich es dort geändert habe (der Einfachheit halber mit "forward". Siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:traffic_signals:direction
Warin61 (2021-07-19 07:25:41+00:00): You have never been here? I have. 

Pages Creek Rd is tertiary, certainly not service! The golf course does not run across this rd. 

I have;
Reduce the size of the golf course, added access and description tags to it. 
Tagged the road correctly.
Duja (2021-07-28 12:05:37+00:00): Znači lepo si uzeo i nacrtao nove highway=residential PREKO postojećih highway=construction umesto da ih ažuriraš. :(
wardmuylaert (2021-08-02 09:03:03+00:00): De luchtfotos zijn out of date voor de nieuwe tunnel onder de treinsporen, je verplaatsing van diens locatie klopt dus niet.
OsmAnd_Pieter (2021-08-02 09:53:25+00:00): Excuses, was me niet bewust van de aanpassingen. Kan u met lokale kennis de zaak corrigeren of nakijken. dankje
Lee Carré (2021-07-18 16:27:05+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please.

Also, what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments 🙂.
eggie (2021-07-18 08:52:41+00:00): Dag Markking..
Is de naam werkelijk Zelfbediening?
Mvg
Eggie
Endres Pelka (2021-07-22 18:42:38+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments