piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_12500175 (2022-10-26 14:27:56+00:00): Hallo DukeDrake , 
klasse das du bei OSM mitmacht und hilfst die Karten zu verbessern.
Allerdings passt das Format der Öffnungszeiten nicht zum OSM-Schema.
Hier der WIKI-Eintrag  dazu https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

Falls du noch Probleme damit hast, einfach melden
Gruß Danfost
DukeDrake (2022-10-27 06:42:11+00:00): Hallo Danfost,

danke für das Feedback. Habe die Syntax eingehend studiert und die Öffnungszeiten nun angepasst:
Mo,Tu,Th 08:00-17:00, We,Fr 08:00-12:00
Hoffe das ist soweit richtig?
Hab mir auch https://www.netzwolf.info/osm/time_domain/erklaerung.html dazu noch angesehen .... 

Grüße

Ralph
user_12500175 (2022-10-27 08:45:39+00:00): Hallo,
zwischen die Öffnungszeiten der einzelnen Tage gehört ein Semikolon 
Mo,Tu,Th 08:00-17:00; We,Fr 08:00-12:00 
in OSM werden Aufzählungen damit getrennt. Ich habs im Tag schon korrigiert. Ansonsten passt es.

Viel Spass beim Mappen
Danfost
skyper (2022-10-27 11:03:09+00:00): Hallo,
In diesem Fall macht es kein Unterschied ob Komma oder Semikolon verwendet werden. Bei `opening_hour=*` ist Komma das Trennzeichen für Auflistungen während das Semikolon zusätzlich vorherige Werte überschreibt.
`08:00-12:00, Mo,Tu,Th 08:00-17:00; PH,Sa,Su off``

Grüße skyper
user_12500175 (2022-10-27 11:08:54+00:00): Hallo,
das wird aber im WIKI anderst dargestellt
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
da ist immer das Semikolon zwischen den Werten ??

Gruß
Danfost
skyper (2022-10-27 12:06:49+00:00): Hey,
ja, merkwürdig, wobei bei "Su-Tu 11:00-01:00, We-Th 11:00-03:00, Fr 11:00-06:00, Sa 11:00-07:00" eben genau ein Semikolon als falsch beschrieben wird.
Laut https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/ ist es das selbe: https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?lng=de&EXP=Mo%2CTu%2CTh%2008%3A00-17%3A00%2C%20We%2CFr%2008%3A00-12%3A00&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0&diff_value=Mo%2CTu%2CTh%2008%3A00-17%3A00%3B%20We%2CFr%2008%3A00-12%3A00

Grüße skyper
skyper (2022-10-29 14:17:18+00:00): Das Wiki ist mMn zu strikt und der Unterschied zwischen Komma und Semikolon wird nicht wirklich beschrieben:
* Komma - additive Auflistung
* Semikolon - exklusive Auflistung, überschreibt vorherige (linke) Werte bei gleichen Tagen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours/specification#explain:additional_rule_separator
user_12500175 (2022-10-29 14:29:13+00:00): Hallo,
so "tief" bin ich noch nicht in die Materie eingedrungen , ich habe mich nur an die Seite gehalten
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
und natürlich geschaut wie andere das so gemappt haben und das war hat immer mit Semikolon.

Gruß
Danfost

Gruß
Danfost
user_12500175 (2022-11-10 11:10:18+00:00): Hallo 
@skyper Zitat:"der Unterschied zwischen Komma und Semikolon wird nicht wirklich beschrieben: "

Zitat aus dem WIKI bei zusätzlichen Regeln
"verschiedene Stunden an verschiedenen Tagen werden getrennt durch ";" ( z. B.> Mo 10:00-12:00,12:30-15:00; Tu-Fr 08:00-12:00,12:30-15:00; Sa 08:00-12:00 )
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
Gruß
Danfost
skyper (2022-11-10 16:33:31+00:00): Hey,

> "verschiedene Stunden an verschiedenen Tagen werden getrennt durch ";" ( z. B.> Mo 10:00-12:00,12:30-15:00; Tu-Fr 08:00-12:00,12:30-15:00; Sa 08:00-12:00 )

ja, genau das ist falsch. Es spricht nichts dagegen an dieser Stelle Kommas anstatt Semikolons zu verwenden und sobald Mitternacht überschritten wird gehen sogar nur Kommas, wie unter den Beispielen weiter oben und den Fehlern weiter unten auf der Seite beschrieben wird.

Es macht allerdings wohl wenig Sinn, das Thema in der CS-Diskussion zu besprechen. Da eignet sich die Diskussionsseite im Wiki, das Forum oder auch Mailing-Listen besser.

Grüße,
skyper
felipeeugenio (2022-10-26 11:14:54+00:00): Hola Cruizz. Por favor no cambiar clasificaciones de caminos sin discutirlos con la comunidad y sin entender del todo lo que estás cambiando. Esto definitivamente no es un living_street.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128056789
4004 (2022-10-26 12:35:37+00:00): здравствуйте, это же не здание?
Tutby (2022-10-26 14:30:48+00:00): Добрый день. Это искусственный холм, но как-то не нашел другого полигона, кроме здания, чтобы поддерживал наклон горизонтальной поверхности в 3d ( demo.f4map.com )
4004 (2022-10-26 15:15:02+00:00): а, ну это не очень правильно - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B4_%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B4%D0%B5%D1%80.

холм не является зданием, даже если его насыпали. если бы над ним была хотя бы крыша, уже можно было бы подумать.
я поправлю, но в ф4 это перестанет отображаться как вы того хотите.
учитывая, что это рельеф, рекоммендую вам посмотреть в сторону моделей рельефа (хотя они как правило не обновляются так часто).

если же вы хотите изобразить спуск для какой то иллюстрации, то рекоммендую вам сделать скриншот из ф4, и потом удалить теги здания.
ну и разумеется есть множество программ, где такую визуализацию можно сделать с нормальными 3д моделями
Tutby (2022-10-26 15:27:32+00:00): Ok. Модели рельефа для OSM - это что например? В f4map вся 3d генерация заточена под здания. Какая есть альтернатива для создания рельефа?
4004 (2022-10-26 18:06:12+00:00): зависит от ваших потребностей, но в осм рельефа нет.
есть SRTM и другие DEM.
есть сервисы вроде https://3d-mapper.com/

теги поправите?
Tutby (2022-10-26 18:53:28+00:00): ОК
4004 (2022-10-26 19:43:07+00:00): спасибо!
Jrachi (2023-12-10 17:34:43+00:00): Ciao.
Ma, sei davvero davvero sicuro che un sentiero si possa chiamare:
Giangisky

Forse è un nome usato da qualche biker, ma sono abbastanza sicuro che non possa essere il nome vero!

Se è il nome con cui è conosciuto da qualche biker dovresti usare il tag:
mtb:name

Ivo
GPar (2023-12-10 19:39:49+00:00): Ciao Ivo, 
ci sono i cartelli di indicazione in molti punti e se non ricordo male c'è persino un portale in legno con inciso il nome che è proprio scritto così.  
Qui ad esempio trovi una news che lo cita: 
https://www.obiettivonews.it/2022/06/20/rocca-canavese-successo-per-il-primo-campionato-italiano-di-e-mtb/

Quindi che si fa?
ivanbranco (2023-12-10 22:19:42+00:00): Non a caso viene citato in un articolo che parla di un campionato mtb, anche secondo me andrebbe spostato in mtb:name=*
Jrachi (2023-12-11 08:45:28+00:00): Secondo me un cartello non indica automaticamente il nome del sentiero.
In questo caso la tua informazione fa pensare di più ad un percorso MTB e che sarebbe più corretto creare una relazione di tipo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes

Ivo, Jrachi
GPar (2023-12-11 19:34:31+00:00): ok modificato
Ciao
felipeeugenio (2022-10-26 11:13:52+00:00): Hola. Le pusiste building a los dos. Es solo a la estructura. Y le pusiste nombre a uno y el amenity al otro. Eso es incorrecto. Hay que ser consistente.
Yo dejaria el tag para el recinto y solo building en la estructura.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128057145
Juampayo Escorpio (2022-10-26 15:20:49+00:00): Acabo de hacer un cambio, pero no te entendí muy bien. No sé si quedó correcto. Por favor, revísalo. Gracias.
felipeeugenio (2022-10-26 17:27:27+00:00): ahi lo corregí. y cambie social_centre por community_centre, que son conceptos distintos. gracias
AndersAndersson (2022-10-27 10:15:12+00:00): Hello
Why did you remove this?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7392519163/history
Now there is a empty useless node and information surveyed by a user is lost.
AndersAndersson (2022-10-28 18:09:11+00:00): Hej igen!
Har du lust att svara?
johantiden (2022-11-07 12:47:15+00:00): Reverted
NieWnen (2022-10-26 12:23:56+00:00): Dzięki za dodanie ścieżek rowerowych.

Niestety to tagowanie nie jest zbyt poprawne. Czy mógłbyś je poprawić zgodnie z wiki? Edytor iD niestety nie wspiera ładnie szablonów do ścieżek rowerowych.

Jeśli jest to ścieżka pieszo-rowerowa to najpewniej będzie to przypadek S5 albo S7 (w tym drugim w Polsce nacisk na highway=path również).

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery

Z góry dzięki, a jak by coś było niejasne śmiało pytaj.
DankJae (2022-10-25 22:19:47+00:00): The previous edit was unrelated, no out of date imagery used, seems the building was never updated.
MxxCon (2022-10-26 05:26:14+00:00): Hello.
I noticed that you use "NYSDOP Orthoimagery - Latest" imagery to make your edits. Unfortunately for now that imagery is at least 3 years old, which can cease you to make changes based on outdated info. For now Bing and ERSI imagery is more up to date, so please consider using it when editing. 👍
osmkarl (2022-10-26 18:03:06+00:00): Noted. Thanks.
CurlingMan13 (2022-10-26 05:29:38+00:00): Everything in this edit looks good!  Feel free to contribute more in the future!

:D
CurlingMan13 (2022-10-26 05:31:32+00:00): Close, but it is a duplicate add.  Node and building should be merged, or there should be either a building OR a node, but not both.

Personally, I think building is the better path if it is the only business in the building.
charles chilufya (2022-10-25 23:08:55+00:00): @Dieudonne, great inputs here. however, your edits are incomplete, not aligned  according to the building type, and appearance. please when you map, use the Q on your keyboard to get a good rectangle shape, O to get a square or circle. take your time and enjoy mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128058820
Glassman (2022-10-26 22:27:09+00:00): #TIP: square buildings by selecting the outline and then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128058957
weblogdryads (2026-06-29 00:27:25+00:00): many of these buildings are crooked and shaped wrong
Shashank Saraogi (2022-10-25 23:34:48+00:00): https://wsdot.wa.gov/construction-planning/search-projects/sr-520-148th-ave-ne-interchange-overlake-access-ramp
Hufkratzer (2022-10-26 20:23:27+00:00): Hi, wieso hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1106968086 mit leisure=horse_riding getaggt (iD-Preset "Reitanlage")? Das sieht mir eher aus wie ein einfacher Reitplatz. Nach dem Wiki sollte ein Reitplatz die Tags leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian bekommen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz). iD-Preset "Reitplatz". Früher hast du Reitplätze ja auch richtig als pitche getaggt (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/863625422).
sdicke (2022-10-27 15:29:33+00:00): Ich hatte mich bislang noch nicht mit dem Tagging von Reit-Dingen beschäftigt und habe das Preset genommen, dass mir am vom Namen her am plausibelsten erschien. Ich habe mir die Beschreibung im Wiki nicht durchgelesen. Dann scheine ich mich vertaggt zu haben.
Hufkratzer (2022-10-27 16:27:59+00:00): Wieso ist Preset "Reitanlage" für einen Reitplatz plausibler als Preset "Reitplatz"? Hast du einen Verbesserungsvorschlag für die Presets?
Fizzie-DWG (2022-11-14 05:38:23+00:00): Hi ModernCRISTAL. Thanks for adding details to OSM! One question though? You've added quite a few residential roads in this area, but they would appear to actually be private driveways? If they are in fact only driveways, then they should be mapped as highway=service + service=driveway + access=private. Any questions about this, please ask! Fizzie
Fizzie-DWG (2023-01-02 02:09:56+00:00): Updated to service + driveway + private
Carlos Brys (2022-10-26 11:22:54+00:00): Su aporte al mapa de OpenStreetMap fue eliminado.
OSM es un mapa colaborativo de interés general. No se admiten anotaciones de uso personal.
gurglypipe (2022-10-26 11:44:25+00:00): Hiya, thanks for your edits around Carlisle. What was your reasoning for deleting the footpath along the bank of the Eden? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/788815341)

If you turn on the Public Rights of Way overlay (in the Background Settings pane), there is a right of way along that bank of the river.
MolluscsBones (2022-10-26 11:58:37+00:00): Thank you! My reasoning was that I was referencing the official map by the Stony Holme golf course for the rights of way, and did not know of that feature. The map I was referencing did not extend to the right of the Old Eden so I made a misjudgement. Ill add a footpath back in now, thank you for notifying me about this error.
gurglypipe (2022-10-26 12:40:10+00:00): Super, thanks for sorting that out. :)

For anyone else stumbling on this in future, the path was re-added in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128081298

Happy editing :)
muralito (2022-10-27 01:29:32+00:00): Hola. El area=yes es innecesario para estos poligonos de etiquetados con "place". Por otro lado, esta la regla de "one feature, one element", por lo que tener un nodo place y una via place que representan la misma cosa en el mundo real, no esta bien. hay que elegir uno u otro.

Fuera de eso, el tema de representar los barrios de Montevideo con poligonos no se ha hecho en todos estos años no por falta de interes, sino porque no es informacion oficial, y por lo tanto no es contrastable ni corroborable. El INE no define los barrios, define "sus" barrios, que muchas veces no son los que la gente maneja. La IMM tampoco, por tanto los limites son difusos muchas veces, donde empieza un barrio y termina otro. Despues ademas esta el tema de como categorizar los barrios, los principales irian con "suburb", y los mas chicos, o que serian parte de un "suburb" irian con "neighbourhood". Pero no es un tema de significado en el idioma, es un tema de como se han convenido los mapeos en OSM para que los datos sean coherentes.
user_5359 (2022-10-27 18:26:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/874135047. What is the meaning of the tags
keyword = 23 umkm
name = UMKM 23
usaha = umkm23
?
Is UMKM 23 really the name of the building or the name of the business?
icukpwt (2022-10-27 21:58:55+00:00): it's name of the business. 
And location of "UMKM 23" is at that building. 🙂
user_5359 (2022-10-28 05:03:35+00:00): Please add the type of the business. The key keyword is a typical SEO SPAM, we don’t want advertising. You are the first person which use the key usaha: please use the standard British English keys or describe the meaning. For more information see https://wiki.osm.org.
icukpwt (2022-10-28 07:00:16+00:00): business type = culinary. sorry my english is not good. Can you help fix it?? I want to share my business location (business name is "umkm 23")
user_5359 (2022-10-28 07:53:22+00:00): Did you search for amenity=restaurant or is this more a Shop with Food?
icukpwt (2022-10-28 08:27:24+00:00): Shop with food
adiatmad (2022-10-28 10:47:29+00:00): @icukpwt: Anda juga bisa menggunakan tag ini (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfood_court). 
Jika berkenan, Anda bisa bergabung dengan komunitas di Telegram OSM Indonesia untuk diskusi cara memasukkan bisnis Anda ke OSM (https://t.me/osmindonesia).
Diana IRM-ED (2022-12-05 01:10:13+00:00): Hi Devraj Devkota, 
You did great job. Due to highway connectivity issue on https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106982774
also based on Bing, Maxar and Esri Imagery, I found that there are two highways that are overlapping.
So, i have to delete it.
Thank for your understanding.
Happy Mapping
Mashin (2022-12-12 09:45:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
This seems all fine. Just two things:
1) When adding a business, you create a point where you add the information. If the business occupies the whole building you can place the tags on the building itself. But don't do both because then you create duplicate objects.

2) Opening hours follow this syntax:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Simple_examples

Happy editing!
CorruptComputer (2022-10-26 03:37:06+00:00): Sorry about the large changeset bounds here, there is a pipeline that I moved slightly during my edit to the airport and it seems the way was quite long.
treestryder (2024-04-07 15:06:06+00:00): I realize you changed this a year ago, but just so you and I can stop flip-flopping these tags...
highway=cycleway means bicycle=designated.
highway=path is more appropriate for nearly every pedestrian way in Michigan. In fact, I am finding most of our mixed-use paths have signs and/or rules posted stating cyclists must yield the right of way. I fix these all over the place, after I've visited the trail and captured Mapillary imagery. I blame iD for suggesting cycleway, where path would be a better starting place. People walking or in wheelchairs will appreciate the routing working correctly for them.
Besides the wiki pages of those tags, see also:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Common_Tagging_Schemes
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
CurlingMan13 (2022-10-26 05:27:17+00:00): Reviewing.  Looks good, however the "H" in hills, the "G" in golf, and the "C" in Club should all be capitalized.

Also, welcome to OSM!  Easiest way to contribute and get involved is by using an app called StreetComplete!  Let me know if you have any questions.
Frans S (2022-11-09 09:25:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A few observations:
Please read what has been said about which fences has to be mapped.
Mapping buildings is not required. But if you map them, square the rectangular ones with the Q key.
Best regards
adiatmad (2022-10-27 03:28:01+00:00): Good day, Devraj Devkota! Good work on your edits on this changeset. But I notice some buildings are unsquared, for example (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1107000194) and (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1106999649). Allow me to suggest you press Q to square buildings. Happy mapping!
paunofu (2022-10-28 08:37:09+00:00): Bon dia,

prep_school s'utilitza més per a classes de repàs de primària/secundària/... i oposicions, encanvi training és per a altres tipus d'ensenyaments  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtraining

Salutacions, Pau.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128062933
AndersAndersson (2022-10-27 10:32:41+00:00): It is good to some cleaning of the data. But destroying surveyed information in not good.

A member is not a customer. A member is a small part owner and a owner is hardly a customer.

weathering_steel is a special kind of steel. It's even included in the Wiki. Why did you change it to ordinary steel?

You removed cusine completely from Bönan café. Why?

You removed pirog from the cusine-tag från Taza grillen. Have they stopped serving pirog? I guess you know since you removed it.

You know that it is forbidden to walk by foot at those roads? I used to live there, but I don't remember. I only remember that you can not go there with a vehicle.

There is no gravel any more at the playground?
AndersAndersson (2022-11-02 11:05:02+00:00): Please respond.
Otherwise I will have to report your changesets to OSM's Data Working Group.
johantiden (2022-11-07 12:13:44+00:00): I seem to not get any notifications when I get a message here.
I do armchair mapping using osmose to help unite the data. I work pretty fast and have made a few mistakes here and there. 

Maybe I trust osmose too much in pointing out errors. weathering_steel, for instance was reported by osmose as an unusual value. 

Any access=yes should be removed since it's saying _any form of transport_ is allowed, which is most likely not what the original author meant. I consider these to be _non data_ and need to be surveyed again. Same with access=unknown, which just says there is no data (so remove it).
SomeoneElse (2022-11-07 12:23:01+00:00): Hello joihoin,
You really shouldn't use osmose from an "armchair", as https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr makes clear: "In no case Osmose-QA should provide you the absolute right way to map, always keep a critical eye."
Please do not remove e.g. "access=unknown" as that means that another mapper has tried and failed to find out what the access rules are, as opposed to no-one having even tried.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2022-11-07 12:23:30+00:00): > I seem to not get any notifications when I get a message here. 
Check the email address which you have registered in your profile.
archie (2022-11-07 16:43:44+00:00): There was an other wide-ranging edit (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86085548), in which amongst others loads (this is the appropriate word) of wikipedia-links in other language than swedish were inserted. Care should be taken with osmose.
SomeoneElse (2022-11-07 16:54:16+00:00): @archie The revert I did here went back to the start of the year.
If any older changeset need looking at please comment there - it would help to see where e.g. invalid brand information has been pulled in by osmose.
archie (2022-11-07 18:54:08+00:00): @joihoin: I rectified most of the wiki-links info for brands in Götaland (southern Sweden). Frankly, I did grasp the extent of this mess rather late and as no-one did bother about the foreign wiki-links I did not want to make any fuss about this. So in southern Sweden most of this is corrected (I think).
aceman444 (2022-10-31 14:42:10+00:00): Zdravim, predpokladam, ze priestor predajne tam zostal, v takom pripade namiesto uplneho vymazania bodu zmenime znacku na shop=vacant (cize prazdny obchodny priestor). Zachova sa tym historia bodu a zabrani pripadnemu obnoveniu obchodu inym maperom zo starsich fotiek ci inych materialov.
supa_95 (2022-11-06 08:56:49+00:00): Dobrý den,
ano pravděpodobně chápete správně. Nebyl jsem si vědom této možnosti, díky za info a podporu.
pitfire (2022-10-27 04:07:32+00:00): Hallo Rotluchs1,

woher stammen die Hs. Nr. Informationen zu den Gebäuden "An St. Göddert 24 und mühlenweg 45". Die Einträge sind im Geoportal nicht hinterlegt, unlogisch und mit Schreibfehler
Rotluchs1 (2022-10-27 14:54:00+00:00): Ich wohne da um die Ecke...
pitfire (2022-10-28 05:53:20+00:00): Danke, das trifft sich ja gut und Du kannst alles nochmals überprüfen. 
An St. Göddert 24 ?
mühlenweg 45 ? 
Ungerade Hausnummern sind normalerweise nicht zusammen mit geraden Hausnummer.
nolim1t (2022-10-27 08:48:40+00:00): Thanks, I am also the only of that place so you can also discuss that with me
osmkarl (2022-10-26 07:46:26+00:00): Hello. What's the source of this "1928" start_date?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128065997
MxxCon (2022-10-26 07:56:16+00:00): Virtually all buildings in NYC have a unique id from the NYC Department of Buildings. It is recorded in tag nycdoitt:bin=*. Using that value you can easily search BIS database to find all the filed documents associated with that buildings. Similarly you can use zola and search either for this address or BBL id of this building and find all the relevant information there.
osmkarl (2022-10-26 08:30:40+00:00): I've reviewed this record at https://a810-bisweb.nyc.gov/bisweb/PropertyProfileOverviewServlet?bin=1059941

I see no indication in that record for the date that this building opened or when its construction was finished.  Is there somewhere else I should be looking to clarify this info?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128065997
osmkarl (2022-10-26 08:42:25+00:00): I see 1928 mentioned at ZoLa for "Year Built", but it seems the date the building was completed was 1929 according to https://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/11/nyregion/fyi-250147.html and Lee Brothers advertisements for this address seem to first appear in the Times in October 1929.

Is the ZoLa record for "Year Built" canonical for osm "start_date", or are other records considered?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128065997