piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
richter_fn (2020-12-13 16:10:44+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95760981
Supaplex (2021-04-16 17:29:20+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
فهد العصيمي (2021-04-10 14:37:21+00:00): ??
SomeoneElse (2021-04-10 16:14:50+00:00): https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/97560536 https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/102690314 https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/101393227
eggie (2020-11-21 12:19:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-11-21 12:23:22+00:00): Dag Bratza..   Gebouwen zijn import vanuit het kadaster en als zodanig precies ingemeten. Je kunt beter niet naar de dakrand kijken.
Of staat hier een compleet nieuw gebouw?
MVG,
eggie
Bratza (2020-11-22 09:16:29+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Nee, ik heb inderdaad naar de dakrand gekeken. Goed dat ik het weet. Bedankt! cu, Bratza
eggie (2020-11-22 10:09:33+00:00): Het gebouw had ik al weer aangepast naar de inmeting van de BGT . De bijkeuken uiteraard intact gelaten.

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-21 12:26:35+00:00): Beste Bratza.. Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dit veroorzaakt vaak schade. Het beste kun je zoiets in twee aparte uploads doen en pannen met de kaart buiten de editmodus.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-21 12:27:39+00:00): Je hebt het hek op een kruising van wegen gezet, maar dat is echt onmogelijk.
Waar staat dat hek?
eggie
eggie (2020-11-21 12:32:56+00:00): Het hek heb ik van de Eeckenholtsweg verwijderd en terugeplaatst waar het vandaan kwam.
Is het highway=path niet een highway=track als het voor de landbouw is?
Je edits.. 
 https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94541998  

MVG,
eggie
Bratza (2020-11-22 11:02:59+00:00): Hallo Eggie bedankt voor de tip. Ik probeer mijn leven te beteren! Ik denk dat het een path is. De boer heeft de neiging om het pad bij zijn land aan te trekken en het om te ploegen. Soms is het gras, soms is het mais, soms is het pad, afhankelijk van de hoeveelheid wandelaars.
eggie (2020-11-22 11:23:46+00:00): Up to you... Vooral plezier in mappen krijgen en houden :)
In het  begin wordt wel meegekeken.. ook door lokale mappers en uiteraard om te helpen.

Kijk ook eens rond op het forum van OSM. Je kunt jezelf toevoegen in het draadje Wie wat waar.
Inlog identiek aan OSM account.

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-22 11:24:38+00:00): Het forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Cascafico (2021-02-12 13:34:06+00:00): ho rimosso ref=2 dai tratti... vedi te se fare la relazione lwn
VitalieS (2020-11-23 03:04:52+00:00): Novamed există deja la acestă locație pe OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94542293
Andrea Musuruane (2020-11-22 11:18:06+00:00): Ciao, non usare le immagini satellitari di Bing perché non sono ben allineate. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Inoltre, non ho ancora capito cosa sono queste highway=living_street che stai inserendo. Ciao, Andrea
limes11 (2020-11-21 13:58:51+00:00): Hi,

What's this?

A tourist attraction called "giant tree" but without German name?

If there is an extraordinary tree that needs to be added to the database, use "natural=tree" and add its genus/species and potentially a name if there is one shown on some kind of tag/board. "giant tree" does not classify as name.

Greets!
Supaplex (2021-04-16 17:29:36+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-16 17:29:49+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SuperFlomm (2020-11-21 14:25:17+00:00): Hallo Th-schumi,
dieser Bereich ist ein Acker, keine Obstplantage, darum sollte "landuse=farmland" benutzt werden. Änderst du das bitte?
Th-schumi (2020-11-21 17:07:41+00:00): Korrigiert
eggie (2020-11-21 13:19:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Tim Van (2020-11-21 13:41:38+00:00): Dank!
eggie (2020-11-21 13:21:48+00:00): Wellicht access=private?
Tim Van (2020-11-21 13:41:13+00:00): Dank voor de reactie. Het is een weg op een TBS kliniek. misschien is private wat zacht uitgedrukt?
eggie (2020-11-21 13:56:21+00:00): Dat zal best... 
Gr eggie
NieWnen (2020-11-22 04:31:57+00:00): Hej, 
dlaczego tag building=yes został zastąpiony area=yes dla 2 budynków oraz dlaczego do przejścia dla pieszych został przypisany adres?

Opis zmiany nieco sprzeczny :).
eggie (2020-11-21 13:23:32+00:00): Dag Tim.. We taggen geen motor_vehicle=yes op reguliere wegen.
Dat is default

MVG,
eggie
GerdP (2022-11-12 07:26:39+00:00): Moin!
Bin gestern von Ganderkesee auf dem Immerweg in Richtung Bürstel geradelt und soweit ich das gesehen habe, wurde in dieser Richtung Tempo 30 nie aufgehoben. Kann eigentlich nicht sein, oder?
user_404333 (2022-11-12 10:12:14+00:00): Moin Gerd,
da wären wir uns ja in Immer, Stüher Straße fast begegnet?

Am Immerweg nördl. dem  Wäldchen Richtung Sportplätze gibt es ein Tempo 50 Schild (auch bei OSM), anders herum in der Tat keine Beschilderung. Hier wird die unterschiedliche Pflasterung ausschlaggebend sein, denn ab dem asphaltierten Teil hält sich niemand an die 30 km/h.
GerdP (2022-11-12 10:23:17+00:00): Gut möglich, ich bin da am Nachmittag gewesen.
Wegen Tempo 30: Ja, kann man wohl so sehen, aber ein Schild fehlt da.
GerdP (2022-11-12 11:04:37+00:00): Noch mal nachgeddacht: Ich war da vorgestern unterwegs, gestern habe ich Daten erfasst.
user_404333 (2022-11-12 12:35:06+00:00): Danke für deine Bearbeitungen.
achillachill (2020-11-21 13:54:43+00:00): Ist die Apotheke bereits komplett leer, also nicht mehr als Apotheke am Brüsseler Platz erkennbar?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94543872
limes11 (2020-11-21 13:57:59+00:00): Das hier verlinkte Bild ist eindeutig:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2339369

Da ist/war wohl ein Pop Up Store (Salzem) drin. Muss man vor Ort schauen, ob der dauerhaft bleibt oder wie es dort derzeit aussieht.
eggie (2020-11-21 13:50:06+00:00): Dag Jordanees... , maar je hebt alle tagging van een G11 fietspad erop laten staan.
Dit zal in ieder geval andere mappers triggeren om de boel weer terug te zetten naar fietspad.
Dus.. welk bord staat er vooraan en wel onderbord.
Hoort NL:G11 er nog wel. Mag je hier met een snorfiets? mofa=yes
Moet het bord NL:G11 (verplicht fietspad) niet weg?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=94544065

Kijk je nog even?

mvg
eggie
eggie (2020-11-21 15:55:39+00:00): PB contact.
eggie (2020-11-21 13:51:20+00:00): Je tagging klopt hier ook niet..
Het is een soort mengelmoes geworden tussen fietspad en wandelpad. 
gr eggie
eggie (2020-11-23 12:49:22+00:00): Als voorbeeld dit stukje even aangepast
Het is een voetgangersgebied met fietsen toegestaan en snorfietsen niet toegestaan.
MVG,
eggie
muchichka_s (2020-11-21 13:27:35+00:00): When correcting one translation, try not to spoil the other please!
muchichka_s (2020-11-21 13:32:52+00:00): From what I see, the station building has its own name other than the station, and you're trying to give it a station name
gileri (2020-11-21 14:48:26+00:00): Merci pour ces correctifs !
richter_fn (2020-12-13 16:10:15+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95760981
lwalviaje (2020-12-04 16:43:48+00:00): This is really a Car Parking
mueschel (2020-11-23 19:15:59+00:00): Hallo,
was heißt denn "disused:condition" an einem Supermarkt? Das Tag gibt es sonst nirgends.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32082639
timetrap (2020-11-24 06:40:54+00:00): Oh, das ist ein Fehler. Ich hatte zuerst nach einer Möglichkeit gesucht, die Schließung des Rewe bereits im voraus einzutragen. Das hatte ich aber nicht herausgefunden, anscheinend war das aber noch im Änderungssatz enthalten. Ich entferne das Attribut. Danke!
!bm (2020-11-21 13:46:44+00:00): s. Anm zu Cs: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94527139
VitalieS (2020-11-23 03:00:18+00:00): La această locație nu se află sala de banchete SanMari? Cum se numește magazinul alimentar de aici și unde se află față de restaurant?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94545248
joder (2020-11-23 07:09:27+00:00): Yes, this small grocery store is in the building of the SanMari. It opened around 7 months ago and only recently put the sign of "Magazin Alimentar" at the entrance. There is no specific name of this shop, only magazin alimentar.
Jakka (2020-11-22 10:06:33+00:00): attention le "key tag" value son en Anglais...
Vert --> "green" pas de majuscule
Sauf noms propres "streetnames shop name" ;)
edvac (2021-08-24 10:44:52+00:00): Please:

Do not change the China borders unless it is in compliance with the disputed territories doc [1], approved by the OpenStreetMap Foundation in September 2013.

In this changeset you have changed the China border in order to add Doklam to the chinese territory, without discussion nor agreement with the rest of the OSM community.

(DeepL translation)
求你了。

不要改变中国的边界，除非它符合有争议的领土 doc [1], 2013年9月由OpenStreetMap基金会批准。

在这个变更集中，你们改变了中国的边界，以便将洞朗加入中国领土，而没有与OSM社区的其他成员讨论或达成一致。

Rafael Avila Coya.

OpenStreetMap Foundation.

Data Working Group.

[1] https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf

[Ticket#2021081210000075]
NM$L (2021-08-26 16:42:40+00:00): devac您好，
我谢谢您的评论。
那根据所谓的“地上”原则，一个中国实控村——庞达村——是不是应该算在其他的国家里面呀😅？
你是第二或第三个评论有关边界问题之人。我要是不懂“地上”原则的话早他母亲地将所有中国声称领土标注了，我已经很尊重开放街图之原则和现实情况，其余我无可奉告。
并且，数据组可以放任十万甚至九万人按照印政府的口味改边界，不加以警告或提醒，干啥啥不行，双标第一名，我确实忍不了。
最后这些可能有些带入情绪，请见谅，我承诺不会带入编辑。
以我的名字祝福您
宫本宇森于2021年8月27日夜

Dear devac,
Thanks for talking with me!
So according to "On the Ground" principle, should a Chinese actually controled village, 庞达(Pangda), be in other country when OSM ONLY shows ONE boundary, the LAC😅?
You're the second or third person talking about the boundary. Because I understand what the "On the Ground" principle is, I just changed the actually controled area rather than turn all boundary Chinese government claiming into OSM's Chinese boundary. I'm trying my best to respect OSM rules and the actually situation. 
Also, there're some one ONLY changing Chinese boundary in favor of India, never being warned or reminded. 
Please understand that sometimes I can't stand double-standard. And recently I'm angry with some things in real life so maybe these words would disappoint you. Please forgive it and I promise I would never take my anger into OSM data.
Best wishes,
NM$L
Maria Bombardil (2021-08-27 05:33:32+00:00): devac您好，
请问，这是给中国设置自由市了是吧？
现在大陆和台湾也是基于实控来分界的，无论是维基百科，还是Open Street Map，基本上不都应该遵循此潜规则么？
还是说您给我们传达了一个消息，不丹，或者印度，开始和中国在此地发动边界冲突？而且Open Street Map 还要实时更新是吧。
说实在的，这里的确是近年来中国开疆的地方——得益于大陆共产党带领下的扶贫攻坚，很多边疆小村小镇——甚至是国界外但和当地居民同民族的，都要求中国把国界碑向外拓展到他们自己的辖地上。但是，基于互联网的“自由”的普世价值，我们应该尊重当地的意愿。
祝福您。
玛丽亚·庞巴迪·于2021年8月27日下午13时33分。
user_11435438 (2021-09-04 13:51:56+00:00): Dear edvac,
In the file you referenced (Information for officials and diplomats of
countries and entities with disputed territorie), mentioned in the article:  generally meaning physical control. And you can look at the village node/8138514813 , this village was established by China not long ago. So obviously, this area is physical controlled by China now. So unless this village is bombed or demolished by Bhutan or India, otherwise it is under Chinese control, isn't it? The Chinese government does not need discussion or agreement with the OSM community to establish this village, right?
baxi (2020-11-24 12:42:31+00:00): It's not unjustified. There is no border anymore. This territories are under control of Azerbaijan Republic and it will be marked as internal regions of Azerbaijan Republic
syntex (2025-07-27 11:59:51+00:00): ok
sanctificatione (2020-11-21 17:26:18+00:00): Why are street lamps named after https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Pyjamasques ?
user_8722718 (2020-11-21 22:52:08+00:00): Se mi posso permettere: bellissimo lavoro!
Davide Tantardini (2020-11-23 08:35:08+00:00): Grazie!
gileri (2020-11-21 14:28:36+00:00): source=https://www.facebook.com/restomontchat/ plutôt
!bm (2020-11-21 14:47:40+00:00): Hallo CMatz,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM!

Was ist denn jetzt der Name von https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/315794908 ?

OSM-Grundlagen beachtet? Konkret: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben

--besteGrüße!bm
!bm (2020-11-29 20:41:18+00:00): descriptive name, no communication w/i 7d => remove name: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94999808
Vinber (2020-11-21 16:20:37+00:00): Please could you be clearer on your comments ?
 2020-11-17 it's not enough and you seems to do that on sevreal area 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/stingraz/history#map=5/51.059/2.095
stingraz (2020-11-21 16:38:51+00:00): All these changesets come from a GPS track that I walked on that date. The track is available in my uploads. I annotated the changes with a source:gps tag.
What further information would you like to see in the comment?
Vinber (2020-11-21 16:50:52+00:00): You have somme explanation here for example : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

add a track, 2020-xxx

and sory i'm little bit sensitive beacause of that https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94538937#map=13/42.7861/1.2415

but you're fast answer is very good for my mind, thank you :D


and thank you to add you track
stingraz (2020-11-21 16:58:18+00:00): (Je passe en français, ça sera plus simple pour nous deux...)
Merci pour le lien ! J'essaierai donc de faire mieux la prochaine fois :)
Pas de soucis pour le premier commentaire, je comprends le sentiment et je suis tout à fait d'accord sur le fond !
Vinber (2020-11-21 17:04:58+00:00): ah ok, merci  pour le français (mon accent s'entend à l'écrit :) )
J'ai supposé allemand car tu as un locale=de et quelques contributions par la bas il m'a semblé :)
et je ne peux pas passer à l'allemand malheureusement !
Bonne contribution et we
Otenkiya (2020-12-03 20:24:53+00:00): 中山道リレーションが壊れていますので修正をお願いします。ルートリレーションにメンバとしてリレーションを含めることは許されていません。以下のページをご確認ください：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Relation:route
hayashi (2020-12-04 16:22:27+00:00): Otenkiyaさん、ご指摘ありがとうございます。
リレーションの接続確認をしていただいているようで、とてもありがたいです。

さて、「中山道」と「中山道(信濃)」は、どちらも
Relation: type=route, route=foot としてありますので、
Relation:routeを拡張した、"Relation:route:foot"となりますので、下記のWikiが適用されます。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Walking_Routes
route=foot/hiking のようなWalking_routeは、リレーション
[Relation:route:foot/hiking]に限らず、巨大リレーションを分割するのは一般的な手法です。

おそらく、リレーションを階層化するなら[Relation:route_master]を使うべき、とのご意見だと思いますが、[route_master]と[Relation:route:foot/hiking]ではロールの意味が変化してしまうので、同一種のリレーション分割に[route_master]は使えません。（[route_master]は種別の異なるリレーションをまとめるという別の役割があります）

また、「中山道リレーションが壊れています」とのご指摘ですが、waymarkedtrailsで確認した所、壊れているようには見えません。
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=54496&map=11!35.7406!139.6804

とはいえ、JapanTagginｇやTalk-jaでも今まで「街道ルート」に限らず、リレーションについての議論がなされていないのが実情です。
今回、Otenkiyaさんからの指摘を受けたことを契機に、「歴史街道マッピング」のガイドラインを定義しようと考えています。 此の件での反論や追加のご指摘、ご質問などございましたら、下記Wikiの「議論」ページまたは、「slack」https://openstreetmap.jp/node/921 にて、お待ちしております。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MappingProject_Japan_Historic_Path#.E8.A1.97.E9.81.93.E3.82.A6.E3.82.A9.E3.83.BC.E3.82.AF.E5.90.91.E3.81.91.E3.81.AE.E3.83.AB.E3.83.BC.E3.83.88.E3.83.9E.E3.83.83.E3.83.94.E3.83.B3.E3.82.B0
Otenkiya (2020-12-05 21:33:31+00:00): 詳細な回答ありがとうございます。Relation:route:foot がメンバに子リレーションを含める運用をしていたとは知りませんでした。江戸時代のルート再現ではなく、現在でも歩けるルートを記述するリレーションとして整備しているということで了解です。
Ser9ei (2021-03-05 18:18:23+00:00): Тогда уж landuse=greenfield
natural=heath - это исключительно природная  местность, заросшая именно вереском или другими видами семейства вересковых (брусника, голубика, клюква). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dheath
AntMadeira (2020-11-21 18:52:16+00:00): Hi Robercin.
I've seen that you changed some roads in Leiria and other places.
I would like to know why you madde this change from secondary to primary in this changeset.

Regards,
António.
Robercin (2020-11-21 21:20:40+00:00): Hi António.
I've changed from secondary to primary to connect the primary road to both sides of the motorway at the junction.
Regards,
Robert.
AntMadeira (2020-11-21 21:49:02+00:00): Contrary to your change here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/516896677

which I agree with, this highway has only one lane on each direction between roundabouts and doesn't comply with the highway standardization system applied by the Portuguese OSM community, where urban highways are primary if they have at least two lanes on each direction. That's why it was secondary instead of primary.
AntMadeira (2020-11-21 21:49:45+00:00): BTW, you should not use Bing imagery in Portugal. ESRI imagery is much more detailed and recent.
Robercin (2020-11-21 23:02:12+00:00): Thanks for this informations. If I did not follow the standardization system, I apologize, but the EN 242 road on the west side of this junction also has only one lane in each direction and is primary, so in my opinion its connections with both sides of the motorway at this junction should be marked in the same way to keep road network integrity. I'm sorry if I'm wrong.
AntMadeira (2020-11-21 23:55:47+00:00): You stroke a borderline situation, which is the limit between urban and non urban, which is always difficult to judge.
What you say it's true,  however, officially, the EN 242 road starts at the northwest roundabout, which is the reason why the primary starts there, and not in the southeast roundabout. The EN 242 on the right side of the motorway is not EN 242 anymore, in the sense it doesn't belong to the national road network, although it retains the original reference.
Hope this helps to understand better.
Robercin (2020-11-22 01:19:32+00:00): A bit complicated situation. So maybe in this case the primary_link tag will solve the problem?
AntMadeira (2020-11-22 01:35:52+00:00): I don't think so. This cannot be a link, cause it hasn't any characteristic of a highway link. It's a main road, the ancient national road number 242, which used to start in the centre of the city, and now starts at the roundabout that connects to the motorway.
richter_fn (2020-11-21 16:45:30+00:00): Вы меняете у улиц, обозначенных знаком "Жилая зона" тег highway=living_street на highway=residential. Это ошибка, на таких улицах должен стоять тег highway= living_street (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street).
richter_fn (2020-12-13 16:10:00+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95760981
Syl (2020-11-22 15:44:45+00:00): Bonjour, ce chemin existe mais est d'accès privé ?
Si c'est bien le cas il ne faut pas le supprimer mais rajouter la restriction d'accès dans les propriétés du chemin.
Syl (2020-11-23 10:45:45+00:00): Merci de l'avoir ajouté à nouveau !
user_5359 (2020-11-22 05:11:06+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the keys cadc:2020 and cadc:2020_level (for the short cut cadc see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CADC)? If it is a reference number please use the prefix ref:.
Herman Lee (2020-11-22 05:55:39+00:00): I found a key“cadc:2019”on osmwiki means China administrative division code, so I use key cadc:2020 for new division code（2020）and use cadc:2020_level for “城乡分类代码”.
Herman Lee (2020-11-22 06:03:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cadc:2019
user_5359 (2020-11-22 07:05:07+00:00): Please see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=Cadc. I recommend my proposal with the prefix ref:. Can't the level values be translated in an OSM tag?
Herman Lee (2020-11-22 09:31:39+00:00): ok, I will add ref:
Herman Lee (2020-11-22 09:32:43+00:00): but which tagcan means “城乡分类代码”
SekeRob (2020-11-21 17:08:48+00:00): Lol, I did that twice while editing fuel stations at same time, corrected 1, but never got a flag warning for Simoncelli.
thx.
ivanbranco (2020-11-21 17:26:43+00:00): No problem. You did it thrice though: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/715989890
SekeRob (2020-11-21 17:35:17+00:00): Trice ;?))) So many pharmacies and fuel stations here have had outdated tags, and as soon as you add something, you get marked for something else missing on the POI by His Master's Voice. One fuel station of Q8 has been in operation since years, but never does show up in the MISE list. There are 2 of Q8 in town, but the database only lists 2 and Q8 themselves happily lists them all 3. Anyway, there was an 26+ people arrest some months ago here for tax avoidance fraud, authorities claiming they dotched like 50 million in taxes. The fuel here remains inexplicably cheap to anywhere else in the region, if not country.
Anyway, on the msal can only remember 1 alert in the Neis report.
ciao
SekeRob (2020-11-21 17:36:30+00:00): Sorry, 3 Q8 in town, and only 2 listed.
Puxan (2020-11-22 12:21:26+00:00): Muy bien. Gracias por mapear Burundi.     Joaquim
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94550714
mbeyerle (2020-11-21 16:01:06+00:00): Probably more correctly called "Boal Estate Trails"
habi (2022-03-18 11:29:58+00:00): Ciao blümlisalp

Du hast hier rund um https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/875518437/ einige Flüssli eingetragen.
Hast du diese selbst gesehen, oder 'einfach' vom Terrainmodell her extrapoliert?
Im Katasterplan Bern tauchen die drum nicht auf, und machen dort in der Gegend einige https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr -Fehler.
Gruess us Bärn,
habi