piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck (2019-03-11 14:43:56+00:00): Language like that is not acceptable in changeset comments. If someone points out an error in your mapping, rather than fixing it themselves, it is to prevent you from repeating the error over and over in the future. Often, engaging with a mapper and explaining what they did wrong is more work than fixing it - and it isn't made more attractive if in return people are called "useless git". 

OSM is a huge project with hundreds of new mappers every day. If the existing mappers stopped expending their time to teach new(er) mappers how we do things in OSM, then the whole thing would quickly go down the drain. 

So please, if you make a mistake and it is pointed out to you, then own it, fix it, and learn from it, and don't throw around offenses like you did above. Yes, some people can be over-zealous in protecting the map quality, but your immature reaction is not appropriate.

Frederik Ramm / OSMF Data Working Group
hoserab (2019-03-11 18:21:04+00:00): This arose because of a changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67902257) wherein I politely asked for some clarification on why the user Rodrigo Hausen wholesale deleted sidewalk ways for no apparent reason. Interaction was polite until he condescended to me (despite the fact I have made an order of magnitude more edits...) and subsequently started going back through the changesets I've made looking for any small mistake to capitalize on. This was not an "experienced mapper" trying to politely help a "new(er) mapper": this was a haughty mapper trying to vindictively make a point.

You know what will really make the project go down the drain? Alienating experienced mappers with patronizing arrogance, like you've done right now. I make this thing better with free labour and you expect me to put up with being treated with pompous disdain?

To hell with this, I have better things to do.
Viajero Perdido (2019-03-12 06:24:10+00:00): On balance, your efforts are appreciated! Please don't go away...
Nil ilegitimi carborundum.
woodpeck (2020-07-06 11:16:58+00:00): I have removed a comment I added here, because I belatedly noticed that this discussion was over a year old and reviving it now doesn't help anyone. Sorry.
hoserab (2020-07-10 06:32:29+00:00): Don't be shy, Frederik. After all you weren't helpful a year ago, so I see no reason why you should begin self-censoring your useless comments now. Quoted for posterity:

"If telling an experienced mapper not to call other projectmembers "useless gits" in public amounts to "alienating (that experienced mapper) with patronizing arrogance" then I think there is a perception problem.

Just because you're an experienced mapper doesn't mean you can't make mistakes, and if you make mistakes, it is normal for other - even less experienced! - people to make you aware of them. Trying to invoke seniority in such situations is a sign of weakness."

That you dredged this up and swiftly deleted it goes to show that you're completely oblivious. It was never about someone trying to "make me aware of my mistakes", it was about Rodrigo Hausen being a petty jerk because I dared to question his destructive changes elsewhere in the first place. He wasn't trying to be helpful, he was trying to find any perceived mistake he could and add fixme tags (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68003404) in order to exact some sort of retribution for deigning to question him. You were oblivious to this then, and are still oblivious now.

More than that I think what bothers me most is your closing line, "... reviving it now doesn't help anyone. Sorry." Save your insincere "sorry" for some so who'll believe it. You're not sorry for what you said—you're not apologetic for being a massive hypocrite and calling me "weak"—you're only sorry that you didn't notice how old the comment string was. You're only sorry you made yourself look like a fool.

I stand by what I said before: you are pompous and arrogant. I just hope you'll learn to correct this mistake in the way you interact with people. It is normal for other people such as myself to make you aware of your mistakes.
viloan (2019-03-11 00:58:14+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-03-11 01:10:14+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
chachafish (2019-03-22 12:13:31+00:00): Hello, a number of buildings here have been addresses as being on South Harrison "Ln". They should be addressed, South Harrison "Lane". Thanks :)
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-03-11 01:57:49+00:00): the comment for this comment should say 'multiple elements add and remove along the periphery of 'Estrada do Zango-Calumbo'
viloan (2019-03-11 02:25:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-03-11 03:04:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
nevw (2019-03-11 11:21:07+00:00): I would expect that it is incorrect to add the station name to all the individual platform roofs of Central Station in Sydney.
ThomasManson (2019-03-13 03:01:32+00:00): I wasn't sure the best way to address this. The roofs have been added as individual features, not part of the Central Station structure, and not related to Central Station. I need a way to associate them with the station. Would a relation be better?
ThomasManson (2019-03-13 03:54:28+00:00): Or would it be better to update the shape of the station to include the area of the platforms and their associated roofs? My reading of the Tag:railway=station is that it should include the whole station area.
nevw (2019-03-13 04:38:34+00:00): I am unsure of the preferred way to map this either as I too would have expected Tag:railway=station should include the whole station area.
Maybe you could ask on the Aust osm mailing list 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/
nevw (2019-03-13 06:59:39+00:00): Hi Thomas
this wiki gives a few ways to tag a train station
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations
Minh Nguyen (2019-05-23 05:15:20+00:00): Do you have a source for the abandoned Cincinnati Subway that you’ve drawn? It looks like you included a small loop around the present-day Fountain Square, but according to http://www.thecincinnatisubway.com/p/map.html , the subway never made it south of Central Parkway. I’m also unable to find anything claiming that there was ever supposed to be a loop around this block.
rivermont (2019-07-30 00:06:47+00:00): Hi,
there were a few (4) nodes in this changeset on the rails tagged with `Wall=yes`. What I would read as `barrier=wall` is not valid on nodes (although there are over 2,000 used for some reason), and a wall over a rail line would be impassable anyway.
I changed them to `barrier=yes` - see changeset 72790102.
If there is a more appropriate tag please do update them.
Thanks,
Will
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-06-23 18:07:43+00:00): there was more info at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposing-to-deprecate-railway-razed-and-railway-dismantled/109679/301

It seems to me that this mentioned section of supposed tracks should be removed as nonexiting and not actually having any visible traces
nickvet419 (2024-06-24 17:56:45+00:00): The tunnel does make it to the 5th street branch, but is blocked off from that point. the more western tunnel gets blocked off around 6th street.
Minh Nguyen (2024-06-24 18:09:59+00:00): Would you mind elaborating? Where can we find out more about what was built along this southern part of the proposed route?
Minh Nguyen (2024-07-09 18:39:58+00:00): https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/verifying-the-southern-leg-of-the-cincinnati-subway/115820
nickvet419 (2024-07-09 19:30:10+00:00): Been out of town since the last edit of the tunnels. looks like you found a good list of sources for the completed sections.  i think your post should be included in the associated Relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13659143,  also there is a  descent video tour that could be included. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nY6A0_uxyvs
Richard (2020-07-13 08:02:22+00:00): Hi - in this changeset you changed highway=bridleway to highway=service, which is fine, but by adding access=private you've broken bike/foot access. Bridleways in the UK permit bike and foot access. I've reinstated it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87908293 but you might want to take not for future edits and those by your colleagues.
Richard (2020-07-13 08:02:36+00:00): *take note (not "not"!)
adiatmad (2019-09-26 02:28:04+00:00): Halo Pak joema1892. Di changeset ini Anda menambahkan banyak tag berbahasa Indonesia yang belum masuk tag umum di OSM seperti pilih akses masuk, jumlah jiwa, alamat, dan nama pemilik rumah. Saran saya, Anda bisa menggantinya ke tag umum di OSM tanpa mengubah makna agar bisa dimanfaatkan bersama. Terima kasih.
user_5359 (2019-03-17 21:02:18+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of this non standad keys "akses atap, alamat, jml lantai, Jumlah Jiwa, nama, pemanfaatan bangunan, Sarana Informasi, Struktur bangunan, tipe atap, tipe dinding"?
adiatmad (2021-03-06 09:00:39+00:00): Halo Pak joem_solo.
Semoga Anda sehat selalu.
Mohon info apakah semua objek di changeset ini merupakan tag internal dari PMI?
Karena overlapping dengan data OSM dan mohon kesediaannya untuk bantu kroscek ulang.
Terima kasih.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/68009130
mueschel (2019-03-14 14:36:23+00:00): Hi,
could you explain all these tags on these buildings? They are all new and not described anywhere.
For example:
Jumlah Jiwa=5
Sarana Informasi=HP, TV
Sarana Transfortasi=SEPEDA MOTOR
Struktur bangunan=tembok_beton
akses atap=tidak_ada
alamat=RT 03 RW 04
jml lantai=1
nama=HANDOKO
pemanfaatan bangunan=rumah
tipe atap=tile
tipe dinding=brick
fmarier (2019-03-11 16:45:48+00:00): Are you referring to this blog post?
https://blog.mapillary.com/update/2019/02/12/potential-for-openstreetmap-to-seize-the-curb.html
keithonearth (2019-03-13 04:53:10+00:00): That's the one. I was being a bit silly prong that in the edit summery, especially because I don't expect people to read those edit summaries. At least not often. 

Also I was kind ignoring the point of the article, by only tracing the curb around a traffic island, which seems pretty irrelevant for the potential uses the blog post was advocating.
NikAlmino (2019-03-19 15:09:10+00:00): As ruas foram nomeadas em conformidades do IBGE?
horisyu (2019-03-11 05:42:54+00:00): 彦根周辺の寺社仏閣を修正
PT-53 (2019-03-11 08:30:38+00:00): Hallo bike-energy,
kannst Du bitte Deinen Eintrag noch gem. Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station ergänzen.
Danke und Grüße
opendcc (2019-03-14 12:38:44+00:00): Und bitte auch das Name-Tagging bleiben lassen ... Danke!
PT-53 (2019-03-14 18:44:26+00:00): Hallo bike-energy, 
Du hast zwischenzeitlich die Adresse der Ladestation ergänzt. Das wichtigste aber, für welche Fahzeugart die Ladestation ist, fehlt noch immer. So können Radfahrer nicht danach "suchen"!!!!!!
Also bitte noch Fahrzeugart und Stecker-Typen ergänzen.
Grüße
opendcc (2019-03-14 19:02:55+00:00): Es gab bereits eine Forumsdiskussion dazu, welches Tagging für die Stecker verwendet werden soll.
PT-53 (2019-03-15 07:07:36+00:00): Hallo opendcc,
haste mal einen Link dazu?
Grüße
opendcc (2019-03-15 07:40:46+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=741632#p741632
jeka p (2019-03-14 09:53:30+00:00): Dear User,
many thanks for adding charging stations to Openstreetmap.
Following information will be very useful too:
- website (https://bike-energy.com/)
- fee=yes/no
- bicycle=yes ?
- scooter=yes?
- car=yes?
- truck=yes?
Here is a link to wikipedia page with more information and examples:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcharging_station

It would be great, if you could add this additional information.

Thanks!

Best Regards,
Jeka
Sowa1980 (2019-08-12 20:22:57+00:00): Здравствуйте, подскажите причину удаления зданий, куда они делись?
Peter Dobratz (2019-05-09 15:50:52+00:00): Thanks for updating the map.  Let me know if you have any questions.
chachafish (2019-03-18 13:29:03+00:00): Hello, just so you know, the minimums for addr fields are street name and street number. Thank you. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
Hjart (2019-03-11 06:57:28+00:00): Bemærk at vores bot automatisk flytter vildfarne adresser tilbage til deres position i DAR. Er der fejl ved en adresse bør den i stedet meldes til kommunen.
Lars Ole Larsen (2019-03-11 07:02:54+00:00): Ok. Tak for info.
Supaplex (2019-04-07 14:02:26+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站   http://www.openstreetmap.tw (暫時下架)
OSM.TW 備份站 https://assanges.github.io/osmtw-ghpage/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Dimacn (2019-03-11 11:03:38+00:00): Здравствуйте. Там где вы обозначили парк нет реально существующего парка. Максимум это группа деревьев, и то другой площадью. Пожалуйста удалите этот парк.
Dimacn (2019-03-11 10:58:41+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не используйте описательные названия в теге name. В name заносим только официальные названия, а подробности отмечаются специальными тегами. Пожалуйста исправьте. Подробнее:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
mavl (2019-07-21 13:45:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
MaestroGlanz (2020-02-22 08:07:31+00:00): The trail, you added: Is it mostly on the former PEI railway track? Is it in the winter ON the cycleway or NEXT to it? Because if it is on the cycleway, it would make more sense, to create a relation=route for this. Right now it creates a lot of trouble in the Osmose tool. It also is very vague at some points.
Silva1989 (2019-08-02 16:54:18+00:00): I wouldn't use place=locality for a cape, it seems tagging for the renderer and doesn't go very well along with the wiki description. Could you consider reverting to only natural=cape + name=?
Naphi (2019-08-02 17:18:20+00:00): Hello, it's ok for me. 
Bye.
Silva1989 (2019-08-03 10:31:38+00:00): Thanks for replying quickly
abakus_uploader (2019-03-11 23:30:51+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2019-07-21 13:45:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
woodpeck (2019-03-11 09:11:15+00:00): Please be generally careful when adding wikidata links. These *must* be manually checked; you cannot simply hop from an OSM wikipedia link to the wikidata item, because there are situations where the OSM wikipedia link points to something that is not conceptually identical with the object in OSM. It seems to be ok in this case - I am just saying this to make clear that under no circumstances must this be done in a scripted fashion.
Aleks-Berlin (2019-03-11 09:24:35+00:00): I can ensure it is done by hand (no script on my side), but yes, it it sometimes difficult to decide if the original Author did it in a reasonable way. If it is a List or a Building with wikipedia=en:building, then it is clearly wrong. But sometimes it is hard to say.
Many regards, Alex
mortense (2019-03-11 09:13:02+00:00): Yes, I think I made a few mistakes zooming in Merkaartor with "+", but with focus in the "Tags" window.

I will try to be more careful in the future.

BTW: Is there a way to see the direct diff (e.g. so "++" would stand out)?
mortense (2019-03-11 09:48:32+00:00): There may or may not also be some keys with one or more "-".
Aleks-Berlin (2019-03-11 09:49:17+00:00): can you fix that?
mortense (2019-03-11 09:50:54+00:00): Yes, e.g. way 29345928
mortense (2019-03-11 09:51:22+00:00): Yes, I will try to find them and fix them.
Hjart (2019-03-11 09:59:45+00:00): Check out https://osmcha.mapbox.com/
Hjart (2019-03-11 10:04:35+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/GQz can be quite usefull for finding specific tags
Aleks-Berlin (2019-03-11 10:05:54+00:00): check taginfo service:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/key_lengths
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/reports/characters_in_keys#problem
Hjart (2019-03-11 10:06:47+00:00): http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/da/map/#zoom=13&lat=54.90444&lon=9.6205&item=xxxx&level=1&tags=&fixable= is also recommended
Hjart (2019-03-11 10:10:39+00:00): I'm not familiar with Merkartoor and you are of course welcome to use whatever editor you prefer. Please note though that JOSM would have warned against mistakes like these.
mortense (2019-03-11 10:48:41+00:00): It should be fixed now - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68016868
But a review would be nice. In one instance "name" was replaced (way 29345928).
Hjart (2019-03-11 11:55:26+00:00): I just ran JOSM's validator over all of your edits so far and didn't find anything really important. Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/675029348 supposed to be a path though?
Supaplex (2019-03-11 17:44:25+00:00): 可加old_ref=投77
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68014326
opendcc (2019-03-11 11:37:18+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap. Wir versuchen hier eine möglichst gute Karte zu erstellen, dazu gehört auch ein gutes Tagging.

Ein Park ist eine mehr offene Fläche - kurzer Rasen, Solitärbäume. Beim Grünen Ring handelt es sich eher um Wald denn um einen Park.

Ebenso sind Phantasienamen wie z.B. 'Peters Park' zu vermeiden.

Die Änderungen sehen leider nach 'Pokemon'-Mapping / Vandalismus aus - und sie sollten zurückgenommen werden.

Viele Grüße
tux67 (2019-03-11 11:01:38+00:00): Hallo dgemander,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Ist der Schulbus Teil einer offiziellen Buslinie?
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
Stephan (tux67)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68014958
Hjart (2019-03-11 09:48:10+00:00): Er der ikke adgang til p-pladsen længere? Hvad med grillen?
Jesper Blinoff (2019-03-11 09:58:18+00:00): Hej Hjart
Hele området er i forandring grundet Letbanen I odense. Grillen blev flyttet, men er stadig på pladsen. Parkeringen bliver ændret, som vist på: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68015035#map=18/55.39284/10.39750
(du skal lige zoome ind på Benedikts Plads her.) Jeg har blot slettet de veje der ikke længere eksisterer.
Vh
Jesper
Jesper Blinoff (2019-03-11 09:58:56+00:00): Det var dette her link jeg ville have vist:
https://www.odenseletbane.dk/detaljekort/?@55.3930373,10.3973095,19z