piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
pyram (2017-08-05 16:11:40+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, aber hier sind leider ein paar Fehler entstanden:
Der "Radweg" http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512523733 verläuft als Schleife auf bestehenden Wegen und durch ein Gebäude.
Wenn der Fußweg für Fahrradfahrer frei ist (oder ist das ein gemischter Rad-/Fußweg?), dann sollte man den bestehenden Weg ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142347017 ) ändern und keinen neuen darübermalen.

Wie man das am besten einträgt kann man sich hier anzeigen lassen: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/

Wenn das zu schwierig sein sollte, dann erledige ich das, sobald ich weiß welches "traffic_sign" dort steht.
TheSwavu (2017-08-03 09:55:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

I think it would be helpful if you read up on how to map buildings correctly:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
GerdP (2017-08-24 12:58:01+00:00): Hi!
I've corrected a typo highway=residental instead of highway=residential on several ways in this CS. Please make sure that you correct the value in JOSMs auto complete function.
Heinz_V (2017-08-04 18:57:57+00:00): You declare some roads as primary.
Please read the OSM-Wiki!!!
These roads are not primary.
Jan Westerhof (2017-08-03 10:15:37+00:00): Hi Bédé, in NL we map every address separately, not with addr:interpolation any more. This is because we can import all addresses from the Dutch official real estate register. Could you please reverse your edit? I can also arrange for a revert, if you are not able to do this yourself.
What is the reason for your edit?
BéDé (2017-08-03 10:52:22+00:00): Sorry for the inconvenience, I did not mean to cause any trouble. I was just testing a synchronization method in my system (it gets diffs from osm) and wanted to make a harmless change. You can revert it. I won't do such a thing in the future.
menzo2003 (2017-08-03 11:02:04+00:00): reverted
Commodoortje (2017-10-19 23:43:56+00:00): You can do you testings in this environment:
https://master.apis.dev.openstreetmap.org/#map=9/52.4150/5.7349
RicoElectrico (2017-08-03 13:04:17+00:00): Cześć, poprawiłem tę zmianę. Shop=variety_store służy do oznaczania sklepów wielobranżowych, albo "wszystko za 5 zł". Jeśli jakiejś kategorii nie ma w maps.me, to nie należy przez niego dodawać z błędną kategorią.  Patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Ashop%3Dcraft oraz  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dvariety_store
Netmajor (2017-08-03 13:21:47+00:00): Sry za zła kategorie :/ miałem poprawić to w domu w open Street.
RicoElectrico (2017-08-03 11:04:42+00:00): Cześć, po pierwsze proszę o używanie prawdziwych opisów zmian, a po drugie tak nie rysujemy parkingów. Popatrz sobie tutaj: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle
DJ Sushi (2017-08-03 10:30:13+00:00): *Pardon, nie az po Dubove :)
Alecs01 (2017-08-07 14:57:02+00:00): Ciao, ti faccio un paio di appunti, per il tag ele=* è sufficiente indicare semplicemente il numero, è sottinteso si tratti di metri. "Frazione di ecc.." non fa parte del nome, se ti guardi attorno, non si usa da nessuna parte, e nemmeno il tag addr:* per un centro abitato. Per indicare che si trova a Montegrino Valtravaglia potresti usare il tag is_in=* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in che è comunque superfluo visto che ci sono già i confini comunali in OSMhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/46592 ciò che è all'interno, fa parte del comune
RicoElectrico (2017-08-03 11:15:13+00:00): Tyle, że teraz ta granica nie jest zamkniętym wielokątem. Patrz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4840083#map=15/50.0215/19.9648
mmfk (2017-08-08 11:01:06+00:00): Racja - poprawiłem
MiroJanosik (2017-08-15 06:56:27+00:00): Ahoj, vďaka za veľa nových detailov do mapy!
Čo sa týka otváracích hodín na https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5011396886 treba dodržiavať správny formát aby to aj programy a webstránky vedeli spracovať a dobre zobraziť, teda to zmeniť na niečo takéto:
Mo,Tu 7:30-16:00; We 7:30-17:00;Fr 7:30-12:00
ahoj, Miro
MiroJanosik (2017-08-15 06:57:41+00:00): A v tomto formáte to pridať pod kľúč "opening_hours".
VA00 (2017-08-08 19:16:53+00:00): Na zdj. satelitarnych nie widać aż tak rozległego pasa trzcin w Zat. Iznockiej
Mike Baggaley (2017-08-04 14:14:47+00:00): Hi in ways 512562914, 512562912 and 512562910 you have specified access=designated. This is not a valid value. You should only put designated for individual transport modes, e.g. for a public footpath you need to put foot=designated (and ideally designation=public_footpath as well).

Regards,
Mike
dudka (2017-11-14 12:35:36+00:00): назви частіше транслітеруються, ніж перекладаються

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symna_Woda
dudka (2017-11-14 12:36:14+00:00): чи це історична назва?
dudka (2017-11-14 12:39:05+00:00): знайшов Kaltwasser на старих картах http://www.lvivcenter.org/image.php?ci_mapid=99&fileno=2
wanderer52 (2017-11-14 16:22:27+00:00): Prima! = чудова карта (замечательная карта; sorry for defect Ukrainian: украинскoгo нас не учили в социалистической ГДР)
RustyB (2017-08-18 21:33:08+00:00): Hi Manobby - Rusty here, i'm trying to understand what you were up to here with the tree node followed by a line?

Is this a mapping standard in use in Lesotho that we're unaware of? Would be great to understand it some more.
eggie (2017-08-03 13:32:58+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
manoharuss (2017-08-07 05:53:01+00:00): Hi Surendran Subramaniam,

Welcome to OpenStreetmap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. I just observed that you mapped a long trunk_link road in this changeset. _link roads usually refer to small connecting roads from one highway to another highway. Exits, ramps make up these. Please go through http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India:Tags/Highway to understand the tagging schema.


Regards,

Manohar
nammala (2017-08-07 05:43:14+00:00): Hi spyros21,

May I know the reason behind deleting the trunk road and is the road is under construction. Just wanted to confirm the edits.

Regards,
nammala
Müszi (2017-08-06 12:07:26+00:00): Salut!

Piatra Tâlharului există deja pe hartă (node #5011597721), așa că am să șterg punctul desenat de tine.


Szia!

A Tolvaj-kő már rajta van a térképen (node #5011597721), ezért törlöm az általad berajzolt pontot.

-- 
Zsolt
dbaron (2017-10-04 20:50:41+00:00): This road was demolished over a year ago and has been deleted multiple times already, most recently in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40218345 .  Please be more careful when using out-of-date imagery, particularly when the area is *marked as landuse=construction*.
Jothirnadh (2017-10-05 18:53:49+00:00): Hi David,
Thanks for flagging this. Didn't know that this is an issue with outdated imagery. Will be more careful from next time.
southglos (2017-08-03 15:34:02+00:00): Hi
Thanks for adding these footpaths.  If they're public footpaths (legally designated as such and marked with a public footpath sign), you can add designation=public_footpath.  See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation for other rights-of-way options.
Cheers
RicoElectrico (2017-08-03 12:09:40+00:00): Cześć, kilka kwestii:

landuse=residential tak formalnie to teren mieszkalny (choć zazwyczaj taka jest większośc terenu zabudowanego)

Obszar powinien być narysowany bardziej dokładnie - najlepiej, aby biegł po granicach posesji. Teraz zachodzi na pola uprawne itp.

Trzecia sprawa - popatrz tutaj: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50806317
Landuse nie powinno dzielić węzłów z drogami. Potem utrudnia to tylko edycję, gdy trzeba coś odkleić.
iandees (2017-08-03 13:06:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I noticed you added a path and a park, but there doesn't seem to be a path or a park there. It looks like a house. Please make sure you only add things that exist in real life to OpenStreetMap. I reverted this change in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50808695.
RicoElectrico (2017-08-03 12:05:40+00:00): Na pewno miało tu być amenity=college, a nie amenity=school?
Przydałaby się też nazwa szkoły.

Jeśli masz pytania lub problemy, śmiało pisz.
RicoElectrico (2017-08-03 13:06:31+00:00): Popatrz proszę na https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28774263

Wydaje mi się, że skoro, jak sugerują tagi, jest znak "strefa zamieszkania, to powinno tam być highway=living_street.
kuma314 (2017-08-03 13:14:54+00:00): Z drugiej strony to już nie tyle ulica, co dojazd do parkingu i strefa dla śmieciarki do odbioru śmieci z zsypu.

Chociaż może faktycznie zmiana powinna być cofnięta. (automatyczna edycja z aplikacji StreetComplete)
eggie (2017-08-03 13:44:27+00:00): Is this testing the editor?  All your edits are in the data of OSM-map.
Please respond.
fkornel (2017-08-07 10:22:19+00:00): Yeah, sorry, it was a quick data integrity check.
RicoElectrico (2017-08-03 13:10:14+00:00): Cześć. Jeśli poprawiasz obrysy budynków oraz adresację, to nie powinieneś kasować i rysować ich od nowa. To przerywa ciągłość historii tych obiektów. Wycofuję tę zmianę przywracając stare obiekty. Dodaj proszę adresy jeszcze raz, tyle że nie kasując, a zmieniając obecne budynki.
rene78 (2017-08-04 07:17:17+00:00): Why are you doing this over and over again?
southglos (2017-08-03 15:28:54+00:00): Hi
I have partially reverted this changeset, as it deleted one bus stop and merged the other into the post box (so we had a bus stop with operator=Royal Mail)
Cheers
southglos (2017-08-03 15:20:06+00:00): Hi
This has changed a playground into a wood called 'Jubilee Tree'.  Is that intentional?
Cheers
matt_ellery (2017-08-04 21:35:41+00:00): To answer your fixme question on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/267484437 - good spot, you're right. This isn't and has never to my knowledge been a cycleway. I'll change it back to a footway.
user_5359 (2017-08-03 16:48:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have corrected sam smaller errors. But I need your help: Exists the street 10th Court South (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7743808 )? On the aerial images I can only see a big parking building.
trigpoint (2017-08-04 14:40:08+00:00): No, the clue is in the name
Supaplex (2017-10-01 16:45:50+00:00): 
恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
BCNorwich (2017-08-05 10:08:00+00:00): Way: 512580625 Fixed the self intersection of the building outline.
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:17:54+00:00): Way: 512580882 deleted duplicate
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:19:05+00:00): Way: 512580881 remove self intersection
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:19:57+00:00): Way: 512580883 delete duplication
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:23:05+00:00): Way: 512580874 delete duplication
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:25:04+00:00): Way: 512580875 remove self intersection, redraw areas
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:38:41+00:00): Way: 512580871 remove self intersection, redraw areas
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:41:47+00:00): Way: 512580707 remove self intersection
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:50:19+00:00): Way: 512580696 redraw, retag
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:51:07+00:00): Way: 512580695 deleted duplicate area
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:51:42+00:00): Way: 512580694 remove self intersection
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:54:58+00:00): Way: 512580801 deleted duplicate area
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 06:55:56+00:00): Way: 512580800  remove self intersection, redraw areas
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 07:06:02+00:00): Way: 512580796 This way is partially duplicated, has self intersection and is drawn over existing features. Not enough on bing to determine how to correct.
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 07:19:53+00:00): Way: 512580825 remove self intersection and triplication of part of outline
BCNorwich (2017-08-06 07:23:19+00:00): Way: 512580562 deleted duplicate area
BCNorwich (2017-08-11 07:34:33+00:00): Way: 512580767 deleted duplicate area
BCNorwich (2017-08-11 07:37:07+00:00): Way: 512580766  remove self intersection to separate two distinct areas from being joined
BCNorwich (2017-08-11 08:13:39+00:00): Way: 512580505 remove self intersection
BCNorwich (2017-08-17 06:03:47+00:00): Way: 512580624 fixed self intersection
BCNorwich (2017-08-17 06:09:02+00:00): Way: 516287886 fixed self intersection, corrected area outline
BCNorwich (2017-08-17 06:12:32+00:00): Way: 512580796 fixed self intersection, corrected area outline
BCNorwich (2017-08-17 06:16:21+00:00): Way: 512580569 fixed self intersection, corrected area outline
BCNorwich (2017-08-17 06:18:26+00:00): Way: 512580572 remove recreation ground which is part of mapped school ground
user_3022894 (2017-08-26 16:18:09+00:00): Hallo User/-in Mond00,
in diesem Änderungssatz hast du unter anderem auch den Boettingerweg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24985789) bearbeitet und diesen dabei mit trolley_wire=yes versehen. Bist du sicher, dass diese Straße mit einer Oberleitung für Busse versehen ist?
Mond00 (2017-08-27 12:02:02+00:00): Eine Oberleitung ist in der Straße nicht vorhanden. Der Haken sollte bei der Beleuchtung sein. Ist nun korrigiert
user_3022894 (2017-08-27 15:34:01+00:00): Alles klar, danke dir!
dikkeknodel (2018-05-03 18:33:23+00:00): Hi thliborius,
You have added a locality P.2860, this name does not sound like a typical name in use. Considering the altitude in the direct environment, could this actually be a peak without name? 
If yes, then please change to natural=peak combined with ele=2860.
Keep up the high altitude mapping, I don't dare to go there yet.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
thliborius (2018-05-04 09:53:20+00:00): Hi dikkeknodel,

when you look at the swissmap (https://map.geo.admin.ch) you will see a cross with the elevation on the map at that position. It is not a real peak with a name, just (in this case) the highest point in the enviroment and often used for reference in tour reports (and there written as shortcut "P." for "Point" or "Punkt").
But on ridges the lowest point there is also often marked on maps like that - so it isn't really a peak (if you have a look on the swiss map, a bit south there is the "Schwanderer Grat" with lots of these points, for instance P.2795 is more a saddle - I was there but didn't set a waypoint).

So what do you suggest? Mapping it as locality or something else? I think peak doesn't really fit.

Greeting,
thliborius
dikkeknodel (2018-05-04 21:26:19+00:00): Hi thliborius,
Thanks for getting back this quickly. I understand the difficulty, and don't really have a solution either. I am not really familiar with what is relevant to map at high altitude. Although IMHO a high point in between two low points would be a peak and a low point in between two high point would be a saddle, without the relevance of having a name. So when you say 'the highest point in the environment' then I would be inclined to call it a peak. It is however arbitrary which prominence (and how to calculate) is needed to asign these terms.
Since I am not the high altitude specialist, I will leave it up to you. 
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
thliborius (2018-05-06 20:10:06+00:00): Hi dikkeknodel,
ok, thanks for your advice. I think I will try to get an answer in a discussion board. Maybe there is a special tag for these kind of points. As I said: it is a bit difficult because sometimes these points are saddles, sometimes peaks or sometimes only a special point on a ridge. 
Greetings,
thliborius
eggie (2017-08-03 14:01:49+00:00): Op het forum is men er ook mee bezig. Marc Zoutendijk had een topic hier over.
Kijk even op het forum..want het gaat over jouw veldjes..Dan kun je meepraten.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Inlog identiek als osm account

Dit was dat oudere topic van Marc. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56534
user_6110846 (2018-01-21 21:14:14+00:00): Доброго вечора ,  що це за об єкт ?
eggie (2017-08-03 14:14:25+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
П3тр0виЧъ (2017-08-04 08:12:28+00:00): Вы испортили дорогу.
Удалили нужное, и добавили простую линию поверх существующей.
ResursTrans (2017-08-04 08:35:27+00:00): Чем же мы ее испортили? Уточнили на участках дороги - скоростной режим.
П3тр0виЧъ (2017-08-04 08:45:01+00:00): Нет. Вы удалили кусок дороги, а на месте остатков нарисовали простую линию (не дорогу!). Проверьте внимательнее.
sperlingskauz (2018-02-16 22:13:10+00:00): Dear NeemaAlphonce,
for your information: I deleted the double tagging high=residential, since there is already the tagging highway=residential, probably it was just a typo. 
Regards,
sperlingskauz
karitotp (2017-08-07 06:07:12+00:00): Please check also this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512592530/history
Thanks
eggie (2017-08-03 14:18:44+00:00): PB met Welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-08-03 14:26:15+00:00): Je hebt hier de oude gebouwen uit 1921 verwijderd en zelf nieuwe netjes ingetekend. Nu is het zo dat wij gebouwen importeren vanuit de BAG (kadaster).
Dan zitten er direct de goede adresnode en kastergegevens op
Een update uit de BAG kun je aanvragen op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import. In no-time heb je je gebouwen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Zet dan deze link erbij.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50809747

Doe je het zelf? Graag reactie...
b1nny (2017-08-03 14:54:04+00:00): Bedankt voor je reactie!

Een berichtje op het forum plaatsen moet lukken. :)
karitotp (2017-08-07 06:02:59+00:00): Hi, thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Could you please confirm if this lake (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512592707) is there currently. According the satellite imagery it is not there. Thanks 
Karito
freebeer (2017-08-08 10:07:47+00:00): Argh, again I lost my typed text.  Must be more careful what I am doing...
Hi Karito,
The newer Bing z20 imagery with full leaf cover is not a good reference.
If you look at USGS Topographic maps at zoom level 16, you will see, with a slight offset, the path of the brook and a small pond.
This is best seen in aerial orthophotography in the Mapbox imagery at higher zoom levels.  This also corresponds to the previous Bing z19 imagery (and matches my manually-added ESRI as reference with better resolution, matching USGS Large Scale at lower zooms).
This leaf-off imagery shows best the path taken by South Brook, which this user has added as
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512592530#map=18/41.97711/-70.97514&layers=ND
but which is poorly-traced, in the middle with an offset over ten metres from the visible path of the stream.
Also, this stream is falsely tagged as an area as a lake, rather than as a river/stream.
The Pond as drawn in this changeset is too large, and is drawn to the woods boundary.  As seen in the Mapbox imagery, South Brook takes a turn here to the south, where it can be seen following the road before turning and ending up in the wetlands/lake visible and mapped to the east.
To Draxous85, thank you for your contribution and also thanks for asking for help, which I am sure people will be happy to offer.
My offer of help would be to suggest you use a different background imagery in iD editor (I cannot tell you how but I know I have done it), and redraw South Brook not as an area/lake, but as a line as a stream/river, and decrease the size of this Pond to better match the Mapbox imagery, but with your local knowledge.
And to Karito, I hope I have convinced you that there is/was a small pond from the USGS Topo map, as well as the stream visible in Mapbox.
I can try to make these changes if you wish, and then you can correct them or add feedback based on your local knowledge, where I can only go by the several available imagery sources.
Cheers, and happy mapping!
(Tells self to submit this third try at a comment before doing something else stupid, AGAIN)
adrianojbr (2017-08-19 22:56:18+00:00): olá, lubonotto. td bm? aconteceu algo de errado nesse conjunto de alterações. veja: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50810201. vou tentar corrigir. abraço.
Alecs01 (2018-08-21 16:37:27+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1122962 il nome viene per caso da qui? https://www.google.com/maps/@45.689521,9.2820828,17z
dgitto (2018-08-21 18:09:20+00:00): Secondo me inoltre Francesco è nome proprio e Manzoni sembra un cognome. Se è vero vanno in maiuscolo. Inoltre il doppio nome di quella via è sospetto.
Alecs01 (2018-08-21 18:55:30+00:00): Lo avevo notato ma mi sono perso nello storico, sono lì da anni comunque; c'è una Via Don Manzoni lì a fianco, mentre Via Menzonico non è presente nello stradario Istat (può darsi che esista ma non abbia numeri civici), ho aperto una nota.
RicoElectrico (2017-08-03 23:27:33+00:00): Ta ścieżka to teraz jest przecinka, na dodatek ze smoothness=impassable. Trzeba poprawić.
ewienik (2017-08-04 11:35:41+00:00): Dzięki. Zmieniłem z powrotem na ścieżkę - myślałem, że przecinka bardziej się nadaje :-)
Upendrakarukonda (2017-08-04 02:46:25+00:00): Hello Will Rockwell,

 You added park tag to node here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5012150813/history. Can you trace polygon and give park tag? Thank you for contribution.

Regards.

Upendra
Hjart (2017-08-03 14:26:21+00:00): This is a duplicate of an existing entry in OSM, and will thus be removed
opendcc (2017-08-03 20:50:51+00:00): +1
taxi301 (2017-08-16 09:00:44+00:00): cześć. trochę się pośpieszyłeś , zmiany ulic będą obowiązywać dopiero od 18.08.2017.
Przed zapisaniem na serwer sprawdź czy czegoś nie popsułeś , np. budynek Kniewskiego 2b , 3 węzły zostały przesunięte. Poprawiłem.
Pozdrawiam
azalizh (2017-08-16 09:08:34+00:00): OK, dzięki za sprawdzenie. Czasem trudno stwierdzić czy coś zostało przesunięte.
Mac_01 (2017-08-03 18:47:35+00:00): Hallo JayTee77,

ich habe soeben gesehen, das du an der Goethestraße einen Parkplatz hinzufügt hast.
Zwei kleine Punkte:

- Es ist nicht so ganz schön, das dein Parkplatz gemeinsame Punkte, also einen Schnittpunkt mit der darunterliegenden U-Bahn Linie hat. Die U-Bahn hat Layer=-1 und sollte deshalb keinen Schnittpunkt mit Elementen auf der Oberfläche haben. 
QA Tools wie keepRight zeigen dann auch einen entsprechenden Fehler an.

- Laut Wicki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking

sollten straßenbegleitende Parkflächen (längs, schräg oder senkrecht)nicht als Areal getaggt  werden, sondern direkt am highway-Tag mittels Key:parking:lane.

Soweit ich es sehen kann, ist dies auch mehr oder weniger der der Standard in Nürnberg. (Ausnahmen bestätigen die Regel :-)

Möchtest du die Topics selber ändern oder soll ich es tun ?

Viele Grüße

Mac
literan (2017-08-04 11:03:23+00:00): пожалуйста, не надо дублировать (накладывать друг на друга) зоны landuse=residential. Также не надо на них дублировать адреса (они ставятся на здания). Вычистил тут все.
RicoElectrico (2017-08-06 17:00:05+00:00): Ja bym nie dawał ten nazwy w name. Co najwyżej w description.
zzptichka (2017-08-09 20:35:23+00:00): I think you duplicated entire Alta Vista drive here.
Matthew Darwin (2017-08-10 03:57:30+00:00): oops, that was not the intention.  feel free to revert the change.
zzptichka (2017-08-10 03:59:02+00:00): already deleted
Seandebasti (2017-08-06 21:00:17+00:00): sorry its #uae
Firefishy (2017-08-03 17:34:25+00:00): Awesome. Keep it up ;-)
Mustelator (2018-07-13 19:30:37+00:00): Por favor, tenga cuidado a la hora de mover o unir nodos de vías. Había un Cristo enorme en las Rondas con Vía Augusta desde su intervención (no lo he revisado todo) y estaban unidas las vías de arriba con las de abajo.

Gracias.
johsin18 (2018-10-27 16:25:09+00:00): Ich würde sagen, hier ist tatsächlich eine Einbahnstrasse, siehe 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1564636
War es Absicht von dir, das hier zu entfernen?
pitscheplatsch (2017-09-19 20:22:53+00:00): Woher hast du den neuen Umriss des REWE-Marktes in Walsdorf? Es gibt eine Note dazu, siehe: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1140371
StarAsphalt (2017-08-03 15:36:14+00:00): Star Asphalt
5 Grove Street,
Kearsley
Bolton
BL4 8AU
07976 655737
http://www.starasphalt.co.uk/
ACS1986 (2017-08-04 11:45:07+00:00): OSM is a map rather than a business listings site. I've removed the description added to the road. If you have business premises these can be mapped. 
Kind regards,
Adam