piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nurdafur (2019-03-19 21:29:21+00:00): So, nun habe ich endlich wieder einen Laptop zur Verfügung und konnte somit herausfinden, warum ich dort die 3 Campingplätze eingezeichnet habe.
an diesem See gibt es genau diese 3 Stellen, an denen Menschen Windschutzwälle aufgestellt haben.
Spanholz (2019-03-20 14:23:49+00:00): Ah cool, danke für die Antwort. Kannst du das als note=* dranschreiben? Dann regt sich auch keiner auf und es ist eindeutig, wieso du die Plätze hinzugeügt hattest.
Commodoortje (2018-05-17 07:13:41+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
PT-53 (2018-07-27 04:30:47+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
in keepright wird diese Linie ohne Merkmale angezeigt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/588646243

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße
Peter
drikob (2018-06-05 11:37:04+00:00): it's a garden, refrain from delete please or you'll suffer consequences
Minh Nguyen (2022-03-22 20:49:43+00:00): Reverted in changeset 118794072.
Stereo_repair (2018-05-16 22:01:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59031643 where the changeset comment is: revert poor quality mapping
Alecs01 (2018-05-19 12:29:01+00:00): Ciao, il tag corretto è questo (che maps.me probabilmente non conosce): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dmast
archie (2018-05-16 12:15:54+00:00): Jag har raderat name=Bohusleden. Detta namn finns redan i route-relation för resp path. Vad du har skapat är dubletter. Dessa vill vi undvika i openstreetmap. Du kollar väl alltid om respektive highway redan ingår i någon route-relation?
archie (2018-05-16 12:20:36+00:00): Du har taggat några highways som "footways". Jag tror att de flesta user ser användandet av footway höra hemma i bebyggda områden. I lantliga områden, som det här är fråga om, är det nog lämpligare att använda highway=path. Se även https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=footway
viloan (2018-05-16 12:22:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Firefishy (2018-05-16 22:36:57+00:00): Welcome. Unsure if "HH-ID 1" node was intended. Have a great time and look forward to your improvements to the map.
luiswoo (2018-05-17 11:36:00+00:00): Зачем нужно было переносить перекрёстки на Чехова. На что это должно было повлиять? Схема движения от этого не изменится.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:42:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
DD1GJ (2018-05-16 22:37:57+00:00): Hallo baumeister22, ist da wirklich ein Park? Was ist aus dem Haus geworden? http://www.vogthaus-guettingen.de/
baumeister22 (2018-05-18 22:02:49+00:00): Danke ich denke da ist mir ein Fehler unterlaufen
DD1GJ (2018-07-07 09:40:19+00:00): Revert 59016684, falscher Park
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:39:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:31:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
StephaneP (2018-09-06 08:35:55+00:00): Bonjour Pelnoph,

J'ai fait quelques corrections sur tes contributions. D'une manière générale, ce qu'on indique comme "nom", n'est pas l'activité.
Par exemple, "Notaire", ce n'est pas le nom, c'est l'activité.
Ce qui fait que j'ai effacé le tag name=avocats (je ne connais pas le nom de ce cabinet), et ajouté le tag office=lawyer ainsi que lawyer=barrister.

De cette façon, on peut rechercher les avocats sur toute la planète, alors qu'avec la fonction dans le nom, on serait bien embêté.

Au passage, si tu es du coin, il y a des rencontres de contributeurs à Nantes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nantes) et de manière plus ponctuelle, à Clisson, au sein de l'asso gullivigne (gullivigne.org)

A+

Stéphane
parukhin (2018-05-25 19:16:42+00:00): Коллега, приветствую.
Посмотрите, у вас всякая фигня в теги откуда-то попадает, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5622071564/history
power=pole89539803215
power=poleдрам н бас - без названия.mp3
и т.п.
milet (2018-05-16 17:08:28+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM! 
Du hast ein paar Änderungen an den Wegen im Gebiet des Tennenloher Forst durchgeführt, was grundsätzlich erstmal schön ist! 
In dem Gebiet besteht allerdings ein komplettes Betretungsverbot. Die alten Angaben mit "access=no" waren also korrekt! 
(Mit "access=..." wird nicht die Begehbarkeit/Befahrbarkeit eines Weges angegeben, sondern die rechtliche Seite abgebildet)
Vom Betretungsverbot ausgenommen sind nur einige speziell freigegebene Wege (Faustformel: nur geschotterte Wege sind erlaubt). Hier gibt's auch eine Übersichtskarte mit erlaubten Wegen (grün): https://www.erlangen-hoechstadt.de/media/2233/%C3%BCbersichtskarte-betretungsrecht-ma%C3%9Fstab-1-25000.pdf
Ich würde daher deine Änderungen erstmal wieder rückgängig machen (außer du hast neuere Informationen zu den Verboten).
Tschau und viel Spaß weiterhin beim Mappen! :-)
Minh Nguyen (2019-05-20 10:43:31+00:00): Please note that this change and any changes like it are incorrect. TIGER places a space after “O” because it can’t encode apostrophes, but there is always an apostrophe and no space after “O” at the beginning of Irish surnames.
Minh Nguyen (2019-05-20 19:31:32+00:00): More information at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/TIGER_fixup#Road_names
mavl (2018-12-24 23:41:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mini-me (2018-05-16 13:44:53+00:00): Лучше, но всё равно неправильно. Сначала надо было откатить предыдущий пакет правок, чтобы не засорять базу. Затем, заново добавить недостающие остановки и уже потом включать всё в маршрут. И ещё, если "туда" и "обратно" маршрутка идёт по разным улицам, то надо создавать отдельный route для каждого направления и объединять их в один route_master. Предлагаю откатить обе правки и попробовать ещё раз )
mavl (2018-12-24 23:57:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
DaveF (2018-05-16 22:11:47+00:00): Hi Northisland
FYI where pubs have external land the pub details are tagged on the perimeter boundary. This is similar scheme to schools/hospitals etc.
NorthIsland (2018-05-17 08:23:03+00:00): Hi DaveF. I am confused as I find pubs as buildings everywhere around (Bristol, Bath, BradfordOnAvon). Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpub says: "establishment that sells alcoholic drinks that can be consumed on the premises"; "beer_garden=yes - The pub has a garden where customers can sit outside"; "outdoor_seating=yes - The pub has outside seating, possibly café-style". They are only a business with a garden outside, a bit like hotels, cafes etc. Hospital says "Draw an area around the grounds" (because it is usually many buildings?) - wiki Pub does NOT say this. Did your scheme come from before buildings were commonly drawn? Regards Mike
DaveF (2018-05-17 16:38:15+00:00): Hi Mike

If a pub is just a building then the tags should be placed on it, but if, as in this case, it also includes a car park & garden or even multiple buildings then it's more accurate to map a boundary polygon around everything owned by the pub. "beer_garden=yes" & "outdoor_seating=yes" are still valid tags. I would map cafes & hotels with similar features in the same way. I wouldn't take wiki pages as gospel; many were written when the likes of pubs were mapped as just a node. With the ability to zoom in further being introduced, it allowed more detail to be added, hence the pub as drawn now. The schema came after buildings were more commonly drawn.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-05-16 13:13:55+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Diógenes de Sinope (2018-05-16 16:33:36+00:00): Hi Johnwhelan, I used 'Esri World Imagery' to make the 'ways' situated beside 'Zango V', I think that the imagery provided by Esri is more recent, which is probably why it does not correspond to what can be seen in 'Bing Areial Imagery', in my experience, Esri World Imagery, also, better aligns to public GPS traces as well, that is why I have opted to use that over the one provided by Bing, you will have to excuse me for leaving ways, nodes and areas untagged in this region, I had serious computer problems recently, it was a work-in-progress
trial (2018-07-15 16:10:41+00:00): Can you please enter names as they're on the ground? Here the name is Siam-Market, what you entered is a description in Chinese. You may enter that in description:zh but far better is to enter the real name and describe with tags so that anybody can use the information
Alecs01 (2018-05-19 12:27:22+00:00): Ciao, i massi sono già mappati correttamente come natural=stone https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6631056#map=18/45.36389/7.83143 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dstone rimuovo i duplicati
atcomapper (2018-05-16 14:28:32+00:00): Hvis en opdatering berører at andet postnummer (ligesom changeset 59018408, opdatering af 1208, berørte 1466), bliver det berørte postnummer opdateret umiddelbart efter
VlIvYur (2018-05-18 20:52:06+00:00): Привет
Многие из этих точек добавлены были во второй раз. Другие-названы неправильно (Нотариус, АДМИНИСТРАЦИЯ, ДЮСШ) и/или неправильно указан тип (ДЮСШ, Робинзон). Ну и какое-то ненормальное количество супермаркетов для ПГТ-в Питере меньше
Horza (2018-05-16 18:26:52+00:00): Are we sure this isn't Chameleon Drive? As in the type of lizard that changes its skin colour? That feels like it would make more sense and it's a typo in Tiger Roads 2017, after all, it already spells it differently twice.
lorandr_telenav (2018-05-23 12:54:14+00:00): Hi,
thanks for observation, I just changed the name of the street.
mzioma (2018-05-20 10:44:54+00:00): Cześć,

Proszę zwróć uwagę na poniższe linki. Szczególnie w miastach kategorie dróg w OSM nie zawsze odpowiadają kategorii GDDKiA: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce oraz https://bip.warszawa.pl/dokumenty/radamiasta/uchwaly/2689_2010/studium_zal_2_rysunek_17.pdf
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-26 10:44:26+00:00): "zamieniono oznaczenie nieprawidłowe dla dróg krajowych na dla dróg wojewódzkich"

Klasyfikacja dróg w OSM niekoniecznie jest taka sama jak klasyfikacja urzędowa. Skąd twoje przekonanie że tak jest?
Aight 2009 (2018-05-26 11:22:12+00:00): wynika to z obserwacji innych miast w polsce i dróg podobnego znaczenia
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-05-26 11:27:24+00:00): To w takim razie chcę cię poinformować że twoje obserwacje rozmijają się z rzeczywistością.

Zresztą, to że znalazłaś/znalazłeś znaczne ilości dróg do zmiany świadczy o tym że nie do końca tak jest.
Aight 2009 (2018-05-26 11:32:16+00:00): Nie mogę się z tym zgodzić, poniewać niestety, ale ten argument również tobie można zarzucić, a więc jest nic nie wart.
mueschel (2018-05-17 18:17:11+00:00): Hi,
this import of more than 6000 buildings seems to have many issues. Among all the tags I find on the objects, only one is correct (building = yes). All the others are no documented tags in OSM. 
Please fix this!

Here are just a few of them:
addr_city 	=dhaka
addr_country 	=bangladesh
addr_house 	=281
addr_postcode 	=1213
addr_street 	=kaporptti Road Block ca
addr_word 	=19
building_levels 	=1
building_material 	=tin
place_neighbourhood 	=mosharrof bosti
place_suburb 	=banani
Sawan Shariar (2018-05-19 04:53:45+00:00): Dear mueschel
Thank you so much for your kindness. Yes, All the tags are incorrect. Mistakenly I was wrote it (_) in the tags which should be it (:). And some tags are really incorrect. All data will be corrected within a few days. If needed may I contact with you?
Thanks
mueschel (2018-05-19 10:03:49+00:00): Perfect. Thanks for taking care.

Sure you can contact me in case you need help. Just let me know!

Jan
Sawan Shariar (2018-05-19 11:11:46+00:00): Thanks :)
dhoni007 (2019-01-29 01:24:47+00:00): Hi,

While working on one of Indonesian city(Bengkulu), came across your edits where   residential roads are marked as Unclassified along with attribute service=alley/driveway which will given when highway is given as service roads

Is there any particular reason to mark these as unclassified along with service=alley or service=driveway attribute
If not can we go ahead and make changes?

Example Way ID's
way 235423169
way 235431980
way 235436238
way 235431981

Thanks.
freebeer (2019-01-29 12:09:09+00:00): you will have to go through the object history and ask the original mappers this, as my only involvement was to bot-wrangle the restoration of well over 2'000 such ways that were deleted without providing any reason, and as you can see in the commentary in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58903742 , there was no response from the mapper responsible to explain the action.

the avhavi link shows these deletions were concentrated around Bengkulu area and very far from the rest of the changes, to buildings nearly 1000km southeast.

as you can see, i have absolutely no idea if the roads were correctly categorised, nor any of the content of the changeset i reverted to avoid the loss of the work taken to put bengkulu on the map.

as the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235418034/history shows, there has already been a number of category changes over time from different presumably more local mappers.
mueschel (2018-05-21 14:37:27+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node, it has many strange tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5622276584

Thanks, Jan
Gazer75 (2018-05-21 15:25:26+00:00): Oops, looks like one of the nodes I had to import from the aviation obstacle data didn't get retagged properly :) Thanks for spotting that. Fixed now.
Gazer75 (2018-05-22 00:19:47+00:00): How did you spot this error?
mueschel (2018-05-22 09:03:35+00:00): Using Taginfo I generate a list of keys which newly appear in the database - in most cases it's reporting simple spelling mistakes.
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
atcomapper (2018-05-16 14:30:14+00:00): osak:identifier bliver indsat i samme format som det fremgår af DAR. Af ukendte årsager konverterede AWSbot dette til STORE bogstaver of fjernede bindestreger.
Det er meget nemmere at slå en adresse op i DAR, når ID'et har det korrekte format
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:56:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:31:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:12:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:56:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Markus366 (2018-05-17 14:53:10+00:00): test
Miselajus (2018-05-19 19:28:48+00:00): Hallo Markus366,
das ging ja schnell, ich habe in Lokalzeitungen nach Hinweisen auf die Eröffnung gesucht, habe aber nichts gefunden.
Die gps-tracks, die bereits hochgeladen wurden, zeigen jedoch, dass die Umgehung befahren wird, und deine Eintragungen stimmen mit diesen auch gut überein.
Was aus meiner Sicht noch offen ist:
1. der alte Verlauf der L 1014 innerhalb Haynrode wird wohl wieder normale Gemeindestraße,
2. die Relation L 1014 muss noch aktualisiert werden,
3. ebenso die Buslinie 26.
Beste Grüße Miselajus
Markus366 (2018-05-20 10:38:20+00:00): Hallo,

ja, ich denke der Verlauf passt. Mehr Genauigkeit wird sich im Laufe der Zeit mit mehr gps Spuren erreichen lassen.

Die alte L1014 wollte ich noch nicht vollständig löschen. Ich bin mir nicht sicher, welchen Status die Strecke erhält.

Die Relationen werde ich vervollständigen, wenn die ständigen Baustellenumgehungen endgültig weg sind und die Strecke vollständig.

Danke,
Markus
mavl (2018-12-25 00:40:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:12:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
viloan (2018-05-16 14:38:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:35:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
EoghanM (2018-12-21 14:26:48+00:00): Hi, just wondering what the change from 'Grant Thorold' to 'New Clee' is about; was the suburb renamed, or was 'Grant Thorold' never the correct name for the suburb in the first place?
More info in the commit message would have been helpful (yes some people read them!!)
mavl (2018-12-25 00:12:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
kreuzschnabel (2019-12-16 09:22:53+00:00): Naja, so ganz richtig isses nicht, weil hier: https://osm.org/go/0Dfcw1YIo--?m= keine bauliche Trennung ist. Das ist einfach eine Fahrbahn, die sich in vier Zweige aufspaltet. Hat mir vorher besser gefallen.
kug (2019-12-16 12:44:38+00:00): Das war die Korrektur zu (kurioses): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=698877#p698877

So ist es für das Routing klar erkennbar, wenn vielleicht auch nicht perfekt...