piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:53:12+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DavidKewley (2016-12-23 20:11:53+00:00): Hi bilock, welcome to OSM, and thank you for contributing to our shared map! You removed Eastgate Basin Park, writing that it's "outdated information". Can you give more details on why it's outdated, what has changed, or why you deleted it? Naively it looks like the park still exists: http://www.cityofsalem.net/Residents/Parks/ParkTour/Pages/Eastgate%20Basin%20Park.aspx. Thanks! -David
BushmanK (2017-01-27 19:21:34+00:00): No response after a month - makes sense to revert it.
O Fim (2022-01-10 10:02:49+00:00): Ola amigo essa edição seria uma calçada? Você precisa fazer as ligações com a rua para existir roteamento
O Fim (2022-01-10 10:04:30+00:00): Ola amigo essa edição seria uma calçada? Você precisa fazer as ligações com a rua para existir roteamento
Chetan_Gowda (2016-12-23 05:36:39+00:00): Hi Dra9on107, Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM). You can edit good features on OSM to create database. Please go through http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ to learn some basic editing. Once again, you can reply for this discussion to know much about OSM.
DavidKewley (2016-12-23 06:47:37+00:00): Chetan_Gowda, there are two chaotic footways here that do not improve the map. They appear to be attempts to get Pokemons to spawn -- I'm seeing this in my region too (25 new users today adding footways, some mentioning Pokemon). See any reason not to delete the two footways at this location?
andrewwiseman (2016-12-24 02:54:30+00:00): Maybe we can find out where they are hearing about this?
DavidKewley (2016-12-24 03:07:18+00:00): I think the instigation may include these two sources:

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/5jfnrm/how_to_find_the_new_rural_spawn_points/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiJ000T8GbE
geri-oc (2016-12-23 08:22:38+00:00): zu name=* siehe andere Kommentare
geri-oc (2016-12-23 08:21:47+00:00): siehe access-Werte und default-Werte bei highway=* im anderen Kommentar.
Polarbear (2018-07-23 18:19:18+00:00): Die CS des Jahres 2017 wurden revertiert, da sie (fast?) nur Fiktionen und Privates enthielten. 
#60993218 #60993639 #60994143 #60995246
geri-oc (2016-12-23 08:20:28+00:00): siehe zu name=* andere Komentare. loc_name=* ist besser - auch wenn es nicht angezeigt wird, ist es kein Grund, die Daten zu "verbiegen"
geri-oc (2016-12-23 08:18:13+00:00): Lichte Heide sollte als  place=locality mit name=* ohne natural=wood eingetragen sein.
geri-oc (2016-12-23 08:13:38+00:00): sollte vielleicht description:de=Flutgraben werden - oder steht dort ein Schild "Flutgraben"?
manoharuss (2016-12-23 07:02:32+00:00): Hi jrayt,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in mapping your is appreciated. I have found your edits overlapping, adding non existing footways. I have undone your changes. I would like to request to keep the mapping realistic and map only what exists on the ground. Please take a look at  http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions

Best,

Manohar
manoharuss (2016-12-23 06:36:33+00:00): Hi Alexander Court,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions are appreciated. But I have undone your changeset because you have changed road classification of paths to footways. Ex http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51220096 this way is a well mapped way with highway=path tag. For a trail path is correct. May I know why you changed all these ways to footway?

This is my revert changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44612804

Best,

Manohar
geri-oc (2016-12-23 08:11:52+00:00): gut
manoharuss (2016-12-23 06:21:38+00:00): Hi Luciola,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edits to the map are greatly appreciated. But you have left some of the footways here unconnected and there definitely seems to be a road connecting these footways to the nearby residential road. It would be great if you can connect these footways.


Happy mapping!

Best,

Manohar
manoharuss (2016-12-23 06:17:58+00:00): Hi minar,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your contributions to the map are greatly appreciated. I observed some duplicate nodes, overlapping footways in your edits. It would be great if you can fix these.

Best,

Manohar
manoharuss (2016-12-23 06:00:24+00:00): Related changeset comment https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20684450#map=15/34.9375/-81.0297

But first welcome to OpenStreetMap. It would be great if a local mapper can update the polygon here.

Best,

Manohar
Lightning (2016-12-23 13:34:20+00:00): The change of amenity from "school" to "university" is good and definitely needed, but the circular polygon outlining the campus grounds is not accurate.  The rotated "T" shape that was previously there was closer to reality - but probably still had some issues.  I think it may have excluded a couple of buildings that should have been included as part of the campus, and also did not include the "Winthrop Lake" area with the golf course, etc.  I'll try to take a drive around those streets soon to see what I missed.
geri-oc (2016-12-23 08:04:27+00:00): Obwohl ich gebeten hatte nicht weiter zu mappen und zu Fragen erzeugst du immer mehr Fehler - zum Beispiel mit deinem natural=yes, name=Tännich-Grund. Du malst einfach Flächen über bestehendes. In der Karte OSM wird nicht alles angezeigt, was man vielleicht gern haben möchte - OSM ist eine Datenbank, aus deren Daten Karten u.a. erzeugt werden.
Einzelne Node mit Namen (Lichte Heide) gehören an die Fläche der Heide - eventuell sind das loc_name oder alt_name.
name=Fischteiche sicher nicht als Schild vorhanden, sonder eher eine Beschreibung - description.de=*.

Es gibt auch Prüfprogramm - einfach einmal unter Qualitätssicherung nachschauen. Und wenn du nicht mich fragen möchtest, es gibt auch ein Forum:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Sollten weiter gröbere Fehler wie übermalte Flächen oder unverbunden/kreuzende Wege gemacht werden, würde ich auch eine Sperre des Account in Betracht ziehen.

PS: zu access-Werten (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access) gibt es default-Werte -> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany

Bitte beachte mehr die allgemeinen Richtlinen für das Mappen und frage bitte.

Schöne Weihnachten - Gruß Gerd
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:54:16+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
geri-oc (2016-12-23 08:10:48+00:00): gut
nammala (2016-12-23 06:17:59+00:00): Hi Junkman08,

Thanks and welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your edit seems inappropriate for adding the park I am going ahead and reverting the changeset. Let Us know if you need anything from us. Follow this wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_contribute.

Regards,
nammala
nammala (2016-12-23 05:56:11+00:00): Hi Roberto Savi,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Your edit of changing path to footway seems inappropriate . May I know the source of doing this. I am going ahead and bringing back the old edit. Let us know if you want anything from us.

Ragards,
nammala
geri-oc (2016-12-23 08:08:41+00:00): Das ist z.B. eine vernüftiges Mapping.
(Fehler ist lediglich, das der Bach nicht durchgängig ist. Unter der Straße und im Ort liegt bestimmt ein Rohr: tunnel=colvert, layer=-1)
BeKri (2016-12-23 10:56:31+00:00): Meintest du tunnel=culvert (nicht colvert) ?
geri-oc (2016-12-23 11:21:44+00:00): ja - culvert ist richtig.
geri-oc (2016-12-23 08:09:59+00:00): name=Fischteich sollte nicht wegen dem anzeigen missbraucht werden. Richtig wäre description;de=Fischteich
nammala (2016-12-23 06:56:19+00:00): Hi tenderfiddles,

Thanks and welcome to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind giving water=fountain which is not visible in the Imagery. Since it is a crowdsourced project make sure not to add any bad data to the map. Let us know if you need anything. I am going ahead and reverting the changeset.

Regards,
nammala
tenderfiddles (2016-12-24 16:27:37+00:00): Hi there, it's probably because that imagery is a couple years old... I took some pictures to show what I'm talking about, but I dont see a way to attach it...any thoughts?
nammala (2016-12-27 04:16:32+00:00): Hi  tenderfiddles,

If the water fountain exists in the imagery you can go ahead and add saying the source correctly like survey or some ground truth something like that. So that it would have been appropriate. Let me know if you need anything

Happy Mapping

Regards,
nammala
highflyer74 (2016-12-25 12:46:03+00:00): OSM is not a playground. Please refrain from adding fictional data!
highflyer74 (2016-12-25 12:45:49+00:00): OSM is not a playground. Please refrain from adding fictional data!
Sanniu (2017-06-08 08:15:44+00:00): Hi
Paths that are not connected to surrounded roads are useless for pedestrian routing. Can you add such connections where exists, as you seems to have the local knowledge?
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
iMarbot (2016-12-23 18:21:40+00:00): I already re-crated the path and re-did the whole park and added all its feature, so this revert was not needed. There is a now an overlapping path, so I will delete the original.
DavidKewley (2016-12-23 18:59:17+00:00): Oops, sorry about that. Thank you for re-doing the park and undoing my revert!
indigomc (2017-12-06 14:36:37+00:00): What is this area please? Why does it seem to overlap houses or other buildings, and what does its name mean?
manoharuss (2016-12-23 07:59:26+00:00): Hi Dillon Schneider,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in mapping is greatly appreciated. But I have found that this footway you added cross intersecting and unconnected. I have undone your change. It would be great if you can map this correctly and also reminder that private ways used inside personal properties are to be tagged with `access=private` to avoid strangers wandering into your private property using OSM. Read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions.

Best,

Manohar
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
Alecs01 (2016-12-23 09:13:59+00:00): Ciao, non esiste però nessun centro abitato (place=village) che si chiama Tremezzina, è solo il nome che è stato dato al nuovo comune: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/46647 per me non ha senso indicarlo così, basta il nome del comune, i centri abitati sono Tremezzo (che è sede comunale), Mezzegra, Lenno e Ossuccio, più altri centri minori.
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
Jarek 🚲 (2019-06-26 02:26:00+00:00): Some of these are wrong, could you please correct them?
lorandr_telenav (2019-06-26 05:13:11+00:00): Hi. thank you for telling me. I've corrected a few bugs, but many have been corrected in 2017 and you still appear with the old version.
Thank's
poornibadrinath (2017-01-17 05:56:26+00:00): Hi DeoB,
  I came across your edits and noticed you have added artwork tag to traffic signals and other totally unrelated pois. Please note artwork tags are not to be used for anything other than famous art related stuff like sculptures, murals, wall paintings etc. Please change the tags of the all the things to the tags that are relevant or revert this changeset. For more info on tagging, please refer this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tags

Best,
 Poornima Badrinath
yaugenka (2016-12-27 23:17:30+00:00): А почему удалили subdistrict этого нп?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/243033393/
Он же позволяет отличить его от этого
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25103857
iWowik (2016-12-28 13:34:28+00:00): Хе-хе, Леснянский Сельсовет оказывается переименовали в «Запрудский»
Commodoortje (2017-02-09 23:53:42+00:00): Hoi Niels,

Ongetwijfeld was je bedoeling goed, maar wat je hebt gedaan, is dat de detaillering hebt verwijderd. Een park is een overkoepeling. 
het grondgebruik (landuse) is grass/forest en (natural) water en het rekreatiedoel (leisure) is een park.
Overigens, niet ieder stukje gras is een park. Een park heeft meestal een naam.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
Mocht je vragen krijgen, stel ze dan gerust.
Weide (2016-12-24 06:40:36+00:00): Düsseldorf-Reisholz: public_transport=station ist eine area. Nur in seltenen Ausnahmefällen kann es ein Node sein. Das englische Wiki railway=station ist hier etwas irreführend, da die Ausnahme als Normalfall beschrieben wird.
Superadlen (2016-12-23 07:48:05+00:00): new rod
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
DavidKewley (2016-12-24 00:28:56+00:00): Hi Travis, thanks for joining OSM and contributing to our shared map. This footway does not improve the map, so I'm going to remove it. I'd encourage you to add real-world objects near where you live, though! Even footways, if they're real. :) -David
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-24 21:26:29+00:00): Hi hnyd, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting many ways in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44614390
CloCkWeRX (2017-03-21 05:19:57+00:00): This area might need a bit of cleanup to match the bing imagery available - its close, but not quite right.

You might be interested to find the 'square' tool, or shortcut key = S in ID; which makes it a lot easy to get neat looking buildings.

I've tweaked this a bit to remove overlaps
DavidKewley (2016-12-24 02:01:00+00:00): Hi CrystalFlare, I have reversed your edits (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44637380), because they do not resemble reality on the ground. OSM is a shared map, so the changes you make are seen by everyone else using OSM. If you could use help learning to use OSM, let me know. -David
DavidKewley (2016-12-24 02:04:42+00:00): Hi Zumpy, thank you very much for signing up for OSM and improving our shared map! Your change looks good to me. I see on the aerial imagery that there are some roads about 1/4 to 1/2 mile west of Hanover Lane that are not yet in OSM. If you would like to continue contributing to OSM by adding those roads and naming them according to what you see on the ground, that would be great. Thanks! David
DavidKewley (2016-12-24 00:12:07+00:00): Hi Flizzix, thanks for joining OSM and contributing to our shared map! I think we need to reverse the changes you made here, and ask you to use more care when making changes like this. This is too big a wholesale change of paths and tracks to footways, with little but important things missed. Plus, the change from path to footway should be rationalized given the current usage else where and documentation of the ambiguous meanings on the OSM wiki. Let me know if I can help. -David
DavidKewley (2016-12-24 00:16:54+00:00): I've asked the OSM DWG for help reverting this, just FYI.
mavl (2016-12-24 04:03:54+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
DavidKewley (2016-12-24 04:05:46+00:00): Hi deadandbroken, some of these footways look legitimage. Others look fictitious, perhaps an attempt to induce spawn areas in PoGo? Please add true footways, but please don't add fictitious ones -- this is a shared map that is intended to represent what's actually on the ground, for many real-world uses. Let me know if I can help. David
eggie (2017-12-23 22:29:04+00:00): Noit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik. Bij deze.. 
Alsnog...
Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Cindy Cohen (2019-09-20 14:19:54+00:00): The picture you have is old for 3131 West Carson st How can I change it. I own the building now
Geography Canada (2016-12-27 16:37:59+00:00): As Gondar is at more than 94% Amharic speakers, there may be no reason to add the Latin script to it, especially if the name is in English, and not Tigrinya, Oromo, Gurage, or Argobba.
Geography Canada (2016-12-27 16:38:33+00:00): Sorry:

As Debre Berhan is at more than 94% Amharic speakers, there may be no reason to add the Latin script to it, especially if the name is in English, and not Tigrinya, Oromo, Gurage, or Argobba.
Geography Canada (2016-12-27 16:38:54+00:00): Sorry, another mistake :D:

As Debre Berhan is at more than 90% Amharic speakers, there may be no reason to add the Latin script to it, especially if the name is in English, and not Tigrinya, Oromo, Gurage, or Argobba.
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
neuhausr (2017-05-25 14:34:01+00:00): Hi, it's not clear what this memorial is--I can't see anything in imagery and don't find any mention of it online. Can you give some clarification about it or a source? Thanks
stephankn (2017-03-01 22:15:19+00:00): you seemed to have missed to take over the tagging of highway 12 when you turned it into a dual carriage highway. Would be great if you could re-visit that area and add the tags to your newly created ways.
For example this is a start: way 461335048
If you need support in finding the ways with missing tags, feel free to contact me.
Russ McD (2017-03-02 11:24:51+00:00): Hwy 12 west of here is NOT a dual carraigeway ... it may have painted islands in areas, but OSM convention dictates we draw as a single carraigeway.
Also, the where the 2372 and 2278 one way sections cross the 12, the western lanes are NOT connected to the rest of the road, making routing impossible ... very poor work.
stephankn (2017-03-02 22:07:31+00:00): Please check out the forum for further discussion:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=634589
Hjart (2016-12-23 09:49:28+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dit bidrag.

Jeg undrer mig over.. Der er vel ikke deciderede stier på boldbanen ved skolen?
mavl (2017-10-17 17:51:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53016351 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44591809].
mavl (2016-12-27 13:37:23+00:00): Hello. This changeset is incorrect (wrong geometry).  
This changeset is reverted.
eggie (2017-12-18 16:29:49+00:00): alsnog Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
mueschel (2016-12-24 10:59:22+00:00): Hi,
I found the tag 'lvl' on these edits that doesn't exist in other places. I think it it the elevation of the points and should be 'ele' - but has to be converted to meters.

Cheers, Jan
jendrusk (2016-12-25 11:09:54+00:00): Of course you're right Jan - thanks. I'll fix it after x-mas. :)
lostmike (2016-12-23 11:20:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM
Why have you extended this footpath on to existing streets? There's really no need to add separate ways for this.
BCNorwich (2016-12-25 08:35:53+00:00): Yes Welcome to OpenStreetMap, I have reverted your changeset because the duplicated ways would only serve to disrupt existing data. If you need any help adding something please just ask or read up how to do it properly. There's a help section here :- https://www.openstreetmap.org/help
Regards
jacobbraeutigam (2017-01-19 21:31:34+00:00): Hi,

ich vermute, dass das hier alles Neubauten sind (wie hier angemerkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/471107), stimmts? Dann würde ich noch building=yes an den Gebäuden ergänzen. 

Beste Grüße,
Jacob
MMN-o (2016-12-23 10:54:16+00:00): Hej! Är gångstigen du ritade ut nu faktiskt något som går _genom_ parhusen som är byggda där?

Sedan, "namn"-fältet är tänkt för faktiska officiella (eller i övrigt väl förankrade) namn. Något säger mig att "gangstigen" inte är ett sådant.

Jag kan fixa till det, men om du känner att du vill öva lite mer på gränssnittet så är du välkommen att försöka först .)
Grillo (2016-12-25 11:34:26+00:00): Jag återställer, den här har troligen skapats för att påverka Pokemon go. Sådana här edits har blivit vanliga globalt under de senaste veckorna.
*Martin* (2016-12-23 18:50:44+00:00): Ahoj. Otaguj to pomocou https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dtyres alebo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcar_repair, podla toho, co sa viac hodi. A do name daj nazov pneuservisu, nie "Pneuservis".
mikefalzon (2016-12-29 06:21:51+00:00): Hi Isaac azzopardi can you please check the edits you made?
Andreas Binder (2016-12-23 19:03:09+00:00): Hi servus123,
a) You changed a lot of residential streets to path (see red lines in http://up.picr.de/27801604wa.jpg: Niederschlesienstraße, Kirchbachstraße, Boznenerstraße, Sterzingerstraße...). This is nonsense. The streets are for cars...
b) You changed a meadow to church (see green line in http://up.picr.de/27801604wa.jpg): This is also nonsense. This is a meadow
c) Perhaps you made more mistakes

Please fix the mistakes. If you need help, I could revert your complete changeset and you could try your edits again.

Regards,
Andreas
geow (2016-12-23 19:35:52+00:00): I would be in favor for an instant revert, it's the first cs from servus123
geow (2016-12-24 08:23:36+00:00): This changeset was reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44640316

@servus123 Welcome to OSM. Your very first changeset was well intended but introduced accidentally some fundamental errors, see comments by Andreas Binder. 
You might consider taking smaller steps at the beginning and check out these pages first:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/help

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

http://learnosm.org/de/

Thanks
geow
Alecs01 (2016-12-23 10:57:55+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! ho notato che hai cancellato il nodo che rappresenta un quartiere, è corretto? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2554636525/history Se lo hai cancellato per errore si può ripristinare.
Constable (2017-02-06 18:32:57+00:00): Ciao, cos'è questo www.openstreetmap.org/node/4568502374 monumento?
cosa volevi aggiungere?
pyram (2016-12-24 22:39:19+00:00): Jemand hat sich über diese Änderung beschwert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/827342

Dieser Eintrag war doch sicherlich ein Versehen oder? Könntest Du das bitte  selber wieder reparieren?
DD1GJ (2017-03-01 22:41:11+00:00): Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46502816
Hjart (2016-12-23 11:37:27+00:00): Velkommen til vores og tak for dine bidrag.

Bemærk dog at det ikke stier og veje ikke må lægges oven i allerede eksisterende veje og stier og at vi derfor bliver nødt til at slette noget af det du har lavet.
Endres Pelka (2017-01-05 12:09:31+00:00): De iure w Polsce, bo granica oficjalnie przebiega południowym poboczem... Ale droga jest de facto użytkowana wspólnie, czeskie domy nr 404, 204 i 120 leżą przy tej drodze i mają w adresie ulicę Dolní. Lepiej byłoby w tagu "name" (bez sufiksu) zostawić podwójną nazwę. A mrówki niech się mrowią, ich problem.