piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2017-10-02 10:52:21+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Alan (2017-08-31 00:29:30+00:00): Thanks for joining OpenStreetMap! When you're drawing buildings, you can also right-click and choose the "square" option to adjust the angles of the building to make them more rectangular.
Hjart (2017-10-10 11:28:18+00:00): Her fik du sat Himmerlandsvej som ensrettet helt hen til vejen op til privathospitalet.
aharvey (2017-09-07 08:02:18+00:00): I wouldn't exactly call it solved, as turning a road which has no physical separation between the directions into a dual way road creates issues which weren't there when mapped with a single way. But I guess now we have the stop mapped. +1

In OSM we almost need a way on the road centre line representing the physical road which is tagged as a painted solid line, painted dotted line, raised barrier (which can be driven over in an emergency), plastic poles or fence, along with other details about the road line name, classification.

And then separate set of ways representing the road network for routing with ways for different directions and lanes like it's been mapped in this changeset.
aharvey (2017-09-07 08:06:27+00:00): PS. I fixed up some of the turn:lane tags in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51802074
Verdy_p (2017-09-07 08:06:50+00:00): I'd like to know what are the "issues created" that this does not solve, given that there is effectively a separation (and separators are themselves mapped, notably the traffic islands).
Verdy_p (2017-09-07 08:07:06+00:00): Emergency situations may as well take any ways in forbidden directions, could use footways, enter private areas and even pass through  unpaved areas (gardens...)
aharvey (2017-09-07 11:29:53+00:00): Sorry if I sounded negative, I really do appreciate you taking the time to work through this.

Two issues are:
1. You can turn across a solid white line (which is what's separating these two lanes to the south west of the intersection) to enter or leave a property. Mapped as a single way a router can direct you to a destination on either side of the street via either direction of travel on the road. Mapped out as dual way the router must direct you to your destination via only one of those ways (since normally dual carriage ways mean there is a physical separation which you can't cross).
I guess if physical separators (barrier=fence, traffic_island, raised curb, etc) are mapped out in theory routers could try to use that to distinguish dual ways with a physical separation and those with none, but I can see that getting quite messy and to get right.
2. It makes it much harder if not impossible to measure total road length from the OSM database as this single road is no longer the road center-line but instead the center-lane-line. This is less of a concern as it's a problem with the accepted way to map physically separate ways as dual ways, so not really specific to this case.
Verdy_p (2017-09-07 13:42:01+00:00): Point 1 is false. You can't cross the solid line evenwhen exiting a private property. The one way must still be respected and you'll have to go to the next crossing where this will be possible.

Point 2 is not relevant at all. The center line is not better than measuring on the center of any lane, and the effect disappears rapidly with the various curves to the left or right. The variation is also affected by the precision of polygonal lines used to approximate the real curves. Any total length distance will not be measured to the centimetric precision where this has a significant effect only on short distances, but where the center line is not relevant at all and the actual lane will be much more precise ! You can have better precision just by adjusting the polygonal lines to better appromixate the curves, but most ways still have too sharp segments zigzagging between the leftside and right side of the roads, including over sidewalk and their exact length is not represented.
Here you'll note that I took the time to imporve the curves to reduce this effect and this cannot be worse than the previous approximation of the "centerline"

But the presence of trafic islands and other separators cannot be ignored: it even helps drivers to be notified earlier of when to take the correct lane: they'll be notified sooner if they know that lanes are separated long before the actual crossing and this is expected. So I don't see the point of where this could really cause any problem to separate these lanes early where they are effectively marked or barred.
aharvey (2017-09-07 22:27:27+00:00): 1. Not in this jurisdiction. http://www.rms.nsw.gov.au/roads/safety-rules/road-rules/road-markings.html "Drivers are permitted to cross a single dividing line enter or leave a road".

2. I'm not talking about measuring distance for a route, this is irrespective of navigation. It's purely the fact that we no longer have a centre line representation of this non-physically separated road. Which is a loss, but you're right that practically there is not much impact.
GerdP (2017-09-04 09:05:04+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Please review the footbrige https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68873955
It should be mapped with highway=footway, highway=crossing is only used on nodes shared with a major road. I also don't understand why this is a traffic_calming=table now, see
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming=table
What did you mean with ele=2 ?
This tag gives "Elevation (height above sea level) of a point in metres."
Is this the distance of the bridge to the road below? If yes the value seems too low for me.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele
Hope this helps?
Constable (2017-09-29 14:08:15+00:00): is this shop location correct? it looks in the middle of a parking lot
muralito (2017-09-26 00:15:15+00:00): Tenes que mapearlo con las etiquetas power=* que correspondan para que tenga mayor utilidad.
Podes ampliar aca https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power
Alan (2017-08-31 00:25:17+00:00): Thanks for joining OpenStreetMap! When you're drawing buildings, you can also right-click and choose the "square" option to adjust the angles of the building to make them more rectangular.
Alan (2017-08-31 00:24:47+00:00): Thanks for joining OpenStreetMap! When you're drawing buildings, you can also right-click and choose the "square" option to adjust the angles of the building to make them more rectangular.
user_5359 (2017-08-31 16:21:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Ta add a building to the map, please use building=yes instead area=yes.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2019-02-22 11:40:14+00:00): Hello. You added Indenpendence Way here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520151921#map=16/10.5208/7.4398 ), is there any reason why the way/road beside it ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520151922#map=16/10.5209/7.4397 ) doesn't have a name?
docoga (2018-07-26 23:02:54+00:00): I'm curious how Offenbacher_ determined the names of these two creeks?  I've looked at the NHD, as well as USGS topo's from various years and they are both unnamed.  I have found a historical map (1893) that lists "Chaeronea Creek" as Carr's Branch. You've also added names to several other creek around Athens with suspect names.  Any light you can shed on your source for these names would be greatly appreciated.
5m4u9 (2017-08-31 08:06:37+00:00): hola luis, esta bueno que empieces a mejorar el mapa de la zona ex-forno, pero hay algunos detalles que necesitas saber para hacerlo mejor.

"los nombres de edificios"... no es necesario añadir el nombre de cada edificio para ello hay categorías que describen el tipo de edificio. en este caso deberías añadir a cada edificio el tipo "house" o "office" o "industrial" y así.

si un edificio es una fábrica, ubicar la categoría fábrica y rellenar lo que pide el formulario... dudas adelante!
Polarbear-repair (2017-09-15 17:35:05+00:00): There are some area:ha tags in the database which apparently are from data imports.

In general there is no need for such tag, as the area can be derived from the polygon size. 

I wonder how you surveyed the area?

The value you have given does not match the size calculated by JOSM.
GerdP (2017-09-01 05:16:48+00:00): Hi!
I've changed the unusual highway=abandoned_path to
abandoned:highway=path
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
HubMiner (2017-09-07 01:37:20+00:00): Thanks for the link!  Now, how does one stay up do date with all the new updates?!
GerdP (2017-09-07 04:32:03+00:00): Good question. I think whenever you use a tag value for the first time you should try to find a wiki page for it and check taginfo. 
So, in this case you might as well use highway=abandoned + abandoned=path
if you like this better.
keithonearth (2017-09-02 20:51:58+00:00): Hi mappered1, I'm curious, what's the source for these edits adding address you are doing?
keithonearth (2018-11-01 02:09:56+00:00): It's worth adding the source when you upload the edits. For example you could be basing them on a survey, or on the City of Vancouver's address data. It's important not to take anything from google. 

One of the reasons it's useful to add source info to the changeset, is that it allows other users to assess the accuracy of the data. This changeset had the addresses wrong for at least two buildings.

(https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357742110/history and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/357727172/history)
keithonearth (2017-09-17 23:31:30+00:00): Hi mappered1, thanks for the addition of addresses. I did notice that there are 3 buildings with the same address (1733 E33rd). I'm putting a note (here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1143839) about this ostensible error. 

I'd also like to point out that iD (the OSM editor you are using) now has the ability to add source info. If you click on the "add field" dropdown and "sources", you can input any other source. This is nice because it lets other people know where you got the info. For example if you are out walking around you could add "survey" as a source.
keithonearth (2024-07-08 19:55:55+00:00): I'm going through fixing some address errors in this changeset too. The usual stuff: the same address added to multiple buildings, or buildings with multiple addresses only being mapped with one. Only buildings with one address seem to usually be correct.
keithonearth (2024-07-08 19:58:04+00:00): This changeset added the same address to multiple building traces. This should not be done. If there are really more than one building with the same address the address should be added once, either on a central node, or on a landuse area. In this case the one building was incorrectly mapped as many, and I've fixed that, and deleted the unnecessary address tags.
keithonearth (2020-10-28 06:46:52+00:00): I checked the addresses on two buildings, and found the addresses added by this changeset were wrong:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324172370
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/324172363

The buildings had two and three addresses in reality, but a single one from this changeset. As with most (all?) changesets from this user, there is no source tag.
indigomc (2017-09-17 17:33:18+00:00): As with the previous note on another changeset, these points should not be marked as attractions. Please ask for advice in the forums.
indigomc (2017-09-28 17:06:41+00:00): Changeset reverted. See comments in this and previous changesets.
indigomc (2017-09-28 17:09:23+00:00): Changeset reverted, leaving note for the station. See notes in this user's previous changesets.
indigomc (2017-09-28 17:09:49+00:00): Changeset reverted.
R0bst3r (2017-08-31 05:56:51+00:00): Danke!
freebeer (2018-05-11 17:27:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58884852 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me castle spam
user_5359 (2017-08-31 10:21:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your way (and the chnageset before to your point)!

If you need help: You are welcome!
gpstracks (2017-08-31 17:51:06+00:00): Hi.
According with local community, in Italy path number goes ONLY in "ref" tag.

Please revert. Thank You.
gpstracks (2017-08-31 17:50:43+00:00): Hi.
According with local community, in Italy path number goes ONLY in "ref" tag.

Please revert. Thank You.
PlaneMad (2017-09-01 09:13:30+00:00): Hi Arathy, you have incorrectly changed the classification of a national highway from trunk to unclassified. This is incorrect and can cause routing engines to give wrong navigation for this road. Any reason you have done this?
GerdP (2017-09-08 08:41:57+00:00): Hi!
Please check typo oneway=ANZAC Hall
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520206135
Warin61 (2017-09-08 09:28:14+00:00): Opps !!! 
Thanks.
Hjart (2017-08-31 08:27:27+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine mange bidrag.
Bemærk dog at stier (f.eks. her ved Møllekæret) skal forbindes til bilvejen. Det er ikke nok bare at lade dem ende ved fortovet, fordi så kommer navigation ikke til at virke korrekt. Jeg har rettet adskillige tilfælde
AdventurerRussia (2017-09-02 08:23:26+00:00): sid а что ты тут делал?
SID19 (2017-09-05 06:55:36+00:00): В этом районе что Вы обозначили  выровнял значки и расположил их там где они фактически должны быть.
eggie (2019-01-31 13:17:25+00:00): Nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik Bij deze  alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Opmerking.. Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in de editmodus. Je zult de eerste niet zijn die een hoekje van een gebouw over de hele wereld trekt.
MVG,
Eggie
Angelo Giuseppe (2017-09-10 17:07:24+00:00): Hai inserito una relazione su un punto singolo, Josm indica errore.
Eventualmente chiedi in "Talk Italia" Ti sapranno indicare una giusta soluzione.
Ciao
Aneqrs (2017-09-01 08:19:54+00:00): Hej! Du verkar ha ritat Hjortvägen ovanpå bitar av Reliktvägen, så det nu finns två vägar med samma sträckning. För att fixa till det behöver du först ta bort den Hjortväg du skapade. Därefter borde du splitta "Reliktvägen" i trevägskorsningen Geolog/Relikt/Hjortvägen (välj först vägen och högerklicka sen på noden i trevägskorsningen och väjl split). Slutligen kan du ändra det felande namnet på den östra delen av Reliktvägen.
Nakaner (2017-12-06 12:49:19+00:00): Hallo richard_klauss,

befindet sich das Ladengeschäft von Ratzfatz Kindermoden wirklich an dieser Stelle? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5070889621/history

Viele Grüße

Michael
GerdP (2017-08-31 08:39:10+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=unclassfied
instead of highway=unclassified on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456356525
SafwatHalaby (2017-09-13 15:53:06+00:00): Welcome to openstreetmap :)

I changed the road type from "residential" to "service". 

I removed the road names and put the name on the parking lot itself.

Happy mapping!
gendy54 (2017-09-03 23:10:58+00:00): Merci pour les ajouts. N'oublie pas de signaler directement sur les objets la source de tes infos par le tag source=*
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:source
datendelphin (2017-08-31 18:31:45+00:00): Hi
Thanks for correcting this stop. It would be even better if you could map it as two separate stops beside the road, one for each direction (place the node where the sign of the bus stop is approximately)
Thanks again and have a nice day
glglgl (2017-12-07 15:04:02+00:00): Ich glaube nicht, dass das Zusammenlegen von Grenzlinien und Bächen so eine gute Idee ist. Auch wenn die Grenze ursprünglich einem Bach- oder Flusslauf folgte, und der Lauf sich ändert, bleibt die Gemarkungs- oder gar Landes- oder Bundesgrenze, wie sie war. Von daher finde ich das keine so gute Idee.
osm_saint-louis (2017-12-10 17:52:28+00:00): Das sehe ich, wie erkennbar, durchaus anders. Der Grenzverlauf hier ist vertraglich auf die Flußmitte festgelegt, außer bei einem Teilstück, dass ich noch korrigieren werden, wo der Grenzverlauf am (deutschen) Ufer verläuft. Dass sich der Lauf der Flusses grundsätzlich noch ändert, halte ich hier konkret für ziemlich unwahrscheinlich. Anderenorts, wo es sich beispielsweise um größere Wildwasserflüsse handelt, mag es hingegen gerechtfertigt sein, dass der Grenzverlauf in der Mitte des Flussbetts markiert wird.
glglgl (2017-12-11 08:21:15+00:00): Beim Brucherbach liegt mir eine (leider nicht OSM-fähige) Quelle vor, bei der der Gemarkungsgrenzenbverlauf signifikant vom Lauf des Brucherbachs abweicht.

Bei der Blies ist es, wie du sagst: da läuft die Grenze teilweise auf deutscher Seite.
eggie (2021-04-16 09:12:10+00:00): Voor Missing maps begonnen en daarom nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen van OSM Nederland
Bij deze alsnog
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
Polarbear (2018-01-11 11:49:48+00:00): Hi, landuse=commercial seems strange for the area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520252100) around a church (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/513823004), could you consider landuse=religious for the part that belongs to the church?
Adamant1 (2018-01-11 12:14:29+00:00): Oh yeah. Good spot. It had been a church historically and its offices now I think. So I was meaning to delete the church tag and I just never got around to it. Thanks for bringing it to my attention.
tyr_asd (2017-09-01 10:03:15+00:00): Hi Adelina,

It looks like you tagged some large administrative boundaries (including the whole country of Tanzania) as buildings (by mistake). I fixed these problems in the following changesets: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51638243 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51638298

Maybe you can pay a bit more attention next time. ;-)

Best,
Martin
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-08-31 10:26:46+00:00): L'indicazione oneway e vehicle:forward è applicabile solo a percorsi lineari, nel caso di aree il sistema non sa quale verso interpretare per assegnare il senso unico.
In quei casi si mappa l'area della piazza come pedonale e si inseriscono i percorsi del traffico veicolare a cui si possono apporre indicazioni come oneway=yes
Don Piotr (2017-08-31 10:37:07+00:00): Grazie, non mi pare bella come soluzione, ma funzionante.
freeExec (2017-09-01 11:41:53+00:00): Дороги между близлежащими деревнями используется жителями для транзита, а не только тракторами, поэтому не могут быть track.
d3d9 (2017-08-31 10:32:47+00:00): Was ist der Sinn dieser Verschiebung?
R0bst3r (2017-09-01 21:56:53+00:00): Hallo tbsfnk,
Willkommen bei OSM.
Was hattest du denn hier vor? Die Wege wurden getrennt und die Straße neu eingestuft, das sieht so ohne genaue Kenntnis nicht richtig aus.
Ist es nur eine temporäre Baustelle? Dann würde ich die Änderungen rückgängig machen. Ansonsten wäre an Besten, du würdest die Straßen Altenritter und die Neue Verbindungsstraße wieder verbinden, diese von Landstraße zu Verbindungsstraße zurück ändern und den Namen entfernen, da die Straße bestimmt nicht so heißt?
Wenn Hilfe nötig, dann einfach hier melden.
Viele Grüße
tbsfnk (2017-09-01 22:39:02+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,
da ist wohl was schief gelaufen :-( kannst du die Änderungen wieder rückgängig machen?
Danke und viele Grüße zurück
tyr_asd (2017-09-06 12:54:03+00:00): reverted
gendy54 (2017-09-03 23:07:21+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour l'ajout.
J'ai supprimé le nom Passage car le nom ne doit pas indiquer la caractéristique de la chose. Ex: on ne met pas Boulangerie alors que c'est déjà induit par le tag shop=backery. On peut par contre noter Boulangerie des délices, qui est affiché sur la vitrine.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name
rasagy (2017-09-11 11:16:40+00:00): Hey Raagul,

Thanks for adding these data points to the map. Could you add the relevant tags for the auto stands (amenity=taxi) like you’ve added in the recent changeset, and for the road behind the gymkhana (as footway or path)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath

Thanks!
eggie (2017-09-15 18:29:49+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-12 21:47:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 51987297 where the changeset comment is: Attempt at proper clean-up in Trieste after recent 'Karma' vandalism and unsuccessful repair after DWG discussion with local community members
mavl (2017-08-31 16:20:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Возможно, опечатки в названиях улиц:  
Серебрянная улица  
Соловиьиная улица  
  
Посмотрите, пожалуйста.
tyr_asd (2017-09-03 13:27:36+00:00): Hi. Is this roundabout new? I didn't hear anything about it in the news recently and can't find anything online either. Have you seen it on the ground?
tyr_asd (2017-09-03 13:32:47+00:00): On this mapillary image from earlier this year the roundabout is not yet there: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=f-jsZ3hMmrqVLk4mIXCaIQ
tyr_asd (2017-09-03 13:34:30+00:00): Also, if this really is a roundabout, please add the junction=roundabout tag to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520273854 (or if it is not signposted as a roundabout, please still add the oneway=yes tag)
tyr_asd (2017-09-06 11:06:05+00:00): I'm going to revert this changeset, because of missing feedback and the high probability of this being vandalism: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1470
zors1843 (2017-09-19 14:14:26+00:00): De verbinding Markt-Hoogstraat heb je hier onderbroken ?  Geldt dit ook voor fietsers ?
gemeente Oostrozebeke (2017-09-20 05:45:30+00:00): Nee, fietsers en voetgangers kunnen inderdaad nog doorrijden. Ik zal dit aanpassen.
gemeente Oostrozebeke (2017-09-20 06:02:09+00:00): Ik heb een highway=path voorzien en verduidelijkt dat het om zowel fiets als voetverkeer gaat.
Arnebius (2017-09-09 10:29:05+00:00): Poza zmianą nazwy ulicy, musisz jeszcze wykonać zmianę nazwy tej ulicy przy każdym punkcie adresowym.
Endres Pelka (2017-09-15 12:51:28+00:00): Proszę podawać normalne źródło, a nie jakiś iframe z Facebooka.
Endres Pelka (2017-09-15 12:52:36+00:00): Poprawny adres: https://www.facebook.com/zdium/posts/1721965238107351
maraf24 (2017-09-20 20:54:50+00:00): I koniecznie starą nazwę trzeba umieścić w old_name. Yanosik to obsługuje.
tyr_asd (2017-09-03 13:30:10+00:00): Hi. These changes don't make any sense. Why would the roads through the town be classified as trunk? Also I have never seen or heard some of the names you used "Superstrada Zona Industriale" sound like something you probably made up. Can you please state a source for these modifications?
Polarbear (2017-11-26 22:23:52+00:00): Auch hier hattest du schon die Grenzlinie willkürlich verändert.

Repariert.
Supaplex (2017-08-31 11:08:24+00:00): from data.gov.tw
Ser9ei (2021-04-12 10:23:56+00:00): Сочетание highway=street_lamp и 
man_made=mast на рендере дают не очень хороший результат. В чём смысл?
Andrey Novikov (2021-04-22 12:24:08+00:00): 1. До меня они были отмечены, как башни. Я исправил тегирование, на правильное.
2. OSM считает плохой практикой тегирование ради рендлеров.
Ser9ei (2021-04-22 13:22:35+00:00): 1. так тег башни надо было убрать тогда. это же просто фонарные столбы;
2. Это не повод, по-моему, мешать несовместимые теги.
wambacher (2017-09-01 10:20:47+00:00): Hi, can you tell me one reason why you destroid the national boundary of bangladesch?

walter
rogeo (2017-09-10 18:56:27+00:00): Hi marcus_stefan, Bavaria DOP 80cm ist schon richtig als Vorlage.
Die Gebäude sollten in der Regel rechteckig sein. Im Internet gibt es viele Anleitungen, je nach verwendeten Editor.
Stichwort: OSM Gebäude zeichnen.

Ich hab schon mal hier schnell was korrigiert.
geow (2017-09-10 21:16:23+00:00): Jeder Editor hat ein Tastenkürzel um Flächen rechtwinklig zu machen - in iD einfach Gebäude auswählen + s drücken.
silvestrerevueltas (2017-09-01 14:32:23+00:00): please revert this change, i didn't knew what i was doing :S