piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maestro_alubia (2023-12-08 10:50:14+00:00): 👍
KVI0n (2021-09-17 16:09:53+00:00): Error: source Bing
SK53 (2021-09-17 19:08:10+00:00): Hi Gregor,

Thanks for your edit. I appreciate that you may have had some inconsiderate people assuming that they could access these roads. However removing private roads is not anything like as beneficial as changing the access to private. It is quite likely someone will be along in a little while, spot that roads are missing & add them again. I will therefore restore these roads but with a more appropriate classification and all access private. This should end up having the same effect as that which you intended.

I must confess a bit of guilt that we hadn't spotted these, all local mappers should know that the & Thoresby Estate & this area in  general is private and they certainly should never have been marked as public roads. 

I suspect the issues you have had are because the data is routeable, because the same info is available on other maps including official ones. Please note that these were actually sourced (with appropriate permissions) from Ordnance Survey data so all these roads will be shown on official maps too. The actual Ordnance Survey data also looks wrong (you can see it herehttps://os.openstreetmap.org/#zoom=16&lat=53.22922&lon=-1.03641 ). Roads shown in grey without borders are usually private or restricted access, roads in white are usually public roads. The OS mapping S of the lake looks very inconsistent. It may be worth reporting to them too.

OpenStreetMap is no different in that "the presence of a road, path or track is no indication of a right of way". There are many uses of OSM data which may need this information to be present (the range of actual users of OSM ranges from ramblers through to Amazon Logistics & some blue light services).

One last point, if any properties along these roads get deliveries from Amazon & a number of other logistics companies, it may be better to set the main access route as access=destination rather than private. Similar things apply to the church & the study centre marked on the map (if still open). I'm more than happy to make such updates if you advise me what is most appropriate, but for now they are all marked private. I've also made similar changes to a number of other estate roads in the neighbourhood which also looked similarly incorrectly mapped.

Yours,

Jerry aka SK53
literan (2021-09-18 15:00:51+00:00): для въездов в паркинги более корректный тег amenity=parking_entrance

исправлю
mariotomo (2021-09-17 16:49:04+00:00): hola, bienvenidos a OSM. qué están intentando añadir a la base de datos? el nombre no debería describir el objeto. si es una oficina, podrían revisar si encuentran una etiqueta o combinación de etiquetas que se adapte? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:office
ojalá quieran involucrarse más en el proyecto OSM?
ovruni (2021-09-17 21:11:28+00:00): Hola, este conjunto de cambios es similar al conjunto de cambios 110989504. [0] Se ha revertido por el mismo motivo.
Saludos
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110989504
Andrea Musuruane (2021-09-19 15:18:37+00:00): Ciao. Puoi aiutarmi a comprendere che cosa dovrebbe rappresentare l'area che hai inserito? Dal tagging e dal commento al changeset non riesco a capirlo. natural=fell identifica un'area al di sopra del limite della vegetazione arborea  principalmente coperta da erba incolta, arbusti e muschi. Però quest'area è abbondantemente sotto tale limite. Grazie, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111346044
SiccaBom (2021-09-22 15:58:19+00:00): Ciao, scusa il ritardo della risposta. Chiedo scusa a tutti, spero di non aver fatto nulla di lesivo. C'è un progetto per istituire un'area protetta ai sensi della Direttiva Habitat (rete Natura2000), e poter istituire in quella porzione di prato un SIC (Sito di Interesse Comunitario - https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sito_di_interesse_comunitario), ovvero una specie di piccola area protetta. Il motivo è molto sensibile e non posso ancora comunicarlo pubblicamente. L'iniziativa serve a proteggere una specie molto rara in Italia. E' coinvolta la Facoltà di Scienze Naturali dell'Università di Torino. 

Il tracciato serviva per creare documentazione utile a dare il via alla procedura di richiesta del SIC stesso. Tuttavia, se ritenete sia un problema tenerlo, lo elimino immediatamente.

Grazie mille
Andrea Musuruane (2021-09-23 15:38:42+00:00): Ciao. In OpenStreetMap si inseriscono dati reali e non proposte. Ritengo quindi che questa area debba essere cancellata ed eventualmente reinserita (con i tag adeguati) quando sarà istituita: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area Ciao, Andrea
SGorskiy (2021-09-20 05:29:23+00:00): Пожалуйста ознакомьтесь со статьёй: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2

Не стоит выравнивать объекты и дороги по снимкам из космоса, так координаты снимов сильно отличаются от фактического местоположения. 
Ориентироваться нужно по GPS трекам и карте Strava. 
Подложку космических снимков по ним же и выравнивают. 

Прошу перепроверить свои правки согласно GPS трекам и исправить.
渤海西岸 (2021-09-19 02:41:50+00:00): 你的编辑都是错误、过时的
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-09-29 05:45:17+00:00): Another user said that maxar maybe out-of-date in this area, you can see sentinal-2 or other latest to confirm whether is right.

It isn't a good manner to ignore other mapper's comment. (But I must say that 渤海西岸 have a little irritating)

------
Best wishes
快乐的老鼠宝宝
Belonging to OSMChina DT
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111346406
hauke-stieler (2021-10-09 22:48:10+00:00): Hi,

du hast hier Wege hinzugefügt ohne sie mit der Straße zu verbinden, wodurch sie aber nicht im routing berücksichtigt werden. Immer dran denken Wege vernünftig zu verbinden. Habs eben angepasst.

Grüße
Hauke
StefanHRT (2021-09-17 17:39:57+00:00): Hallo mardiz,
Ein Fahrrad zählt ja eigentlich auch als Fahrzeug und laut hinterlegtem Traffic_sign gilt dort VZ:250 und Privatweg. Mit vehicle=designated hast Du jetzt den Weg für alle freigegeben obwohl das 250er genau das Gegenteil bedeutet ;) VG
mardiz (2021-09-17 18:18:55+00:00): Ich bin vom Hp Elstal gefahren, da gibt es zwar nur eine Treppe nach Norden, die hat aber eine Schieberille für Räder.
Ein Zeichen einer Verkehrsbeschränkung ist von dieser Seite nicht erkennbar
StefanHRT (2021-09-17 18:44:34+00:00): Mir ging es jetzt auch eher um das designated bei vehicle. mMn wäre es besser den Tag vehicle zu löschen und bei motor_vehicle ein destination zu setzen. somit ist ja das radfahren auch wieder frei aber für Autos bleibt es weiter eingeschränkt ;) Sofern es das VZ:250 noch gibt, wird es wohl eher am Zugang Dyrotzer Weg vorzufinden sein.
mardiz (2021-09-17 20:43:38+00:00): Du hast vollkommen recht, ich habe nur nicht an motor-vehicle gedacht.
Ein Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art ohne Einschränkung macht hier mMn wenig Sinn, da die Häuschen bewohnt werden, der Weg ist auch ziemlich ausgefahren.
StefanHRT (2021-09-18 01:55:43+00:00): Deswegen ja das destination (Für Anwohner bzw. Leute wie Paketdienste, die dort hin möchten). Und das der Weg dort gut befahren ist kann ich mir gut vorstellen, auf dem Luftbild von Bing ist ja auch ein Auto zu sehen in der "Wendeschleife"
jleedev (2021-09-18 14:20:48+00:00): Hello, I have some comments:

1) I don't see the name "Hayden Run" on the USGS map, but I do see "Peggs Run". Unfortunately, the GNIS forms are offline and their list of names and citations are unavailable.

Can you provide a source for the name "Hayden Run"?

2) Waterways should flow in the correct direction, following the arrows, and it should connect all the way to the Ohio River waterway centerline.

3) Try to avoid connecting waterways to features such as roads, powerlines, boundaries.
jrh31990 (2021-09-18 15:27:39+00:00): Hayden run is the local knowledge name for the stream. I will log into my computer and do some more research on this. Thank you, moving forward I will not make These mistakes
skquinn (2021-12-15 16:26:26+00:00): Hi,

I-45 is definitely *not* tolled anywhere outside the reversible HOT (formerly HOV) lane. Where did you get your information stating it was?
Mundilfari (2021-09-18 20:07:02+00:00): Hey there - forests in the mall parking lot...interesting choice of tags :)
landuse=grass (and then the trees or natural=tree_row in addition to the grass) would seem more fitting.

The mapping of forests is following different tagging schemes and definitions*, however I'm fairly confident that most mappers will agree that a handful of trees in a parking lot is not enough to constitute a forest...

* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest
Pt873 (2021-09-22 04:43:05+00:00): Olá. A Rua Cento e Cinco não cruza até a Avenida Arterial Interna.
(Inactive) hairyhaggis_kaart (2021-09-22 15:16:24+00:00): Hi Pt873! Thanks for the message. I agree that this road should not have been drawn in as a residential. However it is still getting a lot of traffic (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/906061193584550) so I added it in as a service road. Thanks and happy mapping!
Pt873 (2021-09-22 17:54:09+00:00): Essa área costumava ser um terreno vazio, utilizado principalmente como estacionamento informal e por alguns como atalho informal. Eu tenho a impressão de que a área foi urbanizada recentemente e transformada pela prefeitura em um local para estacionamento de veículos como food truck. Vou tentar confirmar.
(Inactive) hairyhaggis_kaart (2021-09-22 18:03:16+00:00): That makes sense! Thanks for looking into it.
Sandal man (2021-09-20 06:58:08+00:00): Como siempre, gracias por ajustar el OSM, pero dibuja 2 calles una encima de la otra, una highway = residential y una highway = livingstreet.
Por supuesto que no puedes.
¿Quieres solucionarlo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984443307
MxxCon (2021-09-18 15:15:24+00:00): Jollibee has drive-through here?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111348162
promiseofbirth (2022-06-09 22:49:13+00:00): Don't know what I was thinking there
treestryder (2022-01-17 21:01:51+00:00): I believe the initial tags were correct. Have a look at the Michigan Wiki for how to tag for paddlecraft.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Water.3B_Lakes.2C_Rivers.2C_Streams.2C_Creeks.2C_Drains

Also, name tags should only be given to things/places that have a name.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
eggie (2021-09-17 18:50:36+00:00): Hier eerst even je edits om te bekijken.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=111348589

Ik zie een kissing_gate op een fietspad..ook vastgeplakt aan de landuse. (dat wel even los) 
Daar heb je op gezet vehicle=no  op getagd.
Ik denk dat vehicle=no er niet hoort. Ik twijfel ook of een kisssing_gate ook geen fietsers tegenhoudt.
eggie (2021-09-17 18:51:52+00:00): De fixme	= vervolg pad Rivierpark Maasvallei LAW kan nu weg.
eggie (2021-09-17 18:55:10+00:00): en nog een barrier=block met access=no  erop. Dus access=no verwijderen en noexit=yes ook  Dat klopt niet.
Zal nu even naar de routerelatie kijken.
eggie (2021-09-17 18:57:20+00:00): Wanneer je een highway=track verandert in een highway=path (Dus niet geschikt voor bv landbouwvoertuigen)  dan kan de tracktype= grade? weg en zeker van de trappen.
eggie (2021-09-17 18:58:05+00:00): tracktype=grade...  is de specificatie van een track . Dus gebruiken icm een highway=track niet met steps of path.
eggie (2021-09-17 19:02:17+00:00): Opne het realtievenster en selecteer de Lange afstandswandeling RivierPark Maasvallei

Dan zul je zien in het relatievenster dat er gaten zitten dus de volgorde van de routedelen waarschijnlijk niet correct is. 
Wellicht dat die gaten een eind verderop zitten?
Het wordt dus uitzoeken waar die delen horen.   :)
eggie (2021-09-17 19:05:59+00:00): selecteer steeds het volgende stuk daadwerkelijk op de kaart en kijk waar die zit in in het relatievenster.
Veerweg 7 knopen zit er bv 2x in.. Dus een uit de relatie verwijderen. En zo ga je steeds zuidelijker en schuif je in het relatievenster de route delen op de juiste plaats.
eggie (2021-09-17 19:12:50+00:00): De kissing_gate heb ik even losgemaakt van het fietspad. Dat routeert anders niet meer op dit fietspad. Het zit nu op dezelfde hoogte vast aan de landuse aan de westzijde van het pad.
eggie (2021-09-17 19:15:49+00:00): Belangrijk bij die routedelen is dat je alle routedelen in JOSM laadt . 
Dan pas kun je de delen bewerken. 
Dat kan met het groene pijltje links in het relatievenster. Ik denk dat je dat niet hebt gedaan en dan wordt het lastig.
eggie (2021-09-17 19:18:59+00:00): Van beide blokkades barrier=block heb ik access=no verwijderd. access=no is bijna altijd fout.
Niet gebruiken icm met foot=yes
eggie (2021-09-17 19:31:29+00:00): De fixme's heb ik verwijderd. noexit=yes idem
eggie (2021-09-17 19:33:21+00:00): Ga je zelf proberen de routedelen in de goede volgorde te krijgen?
Wanneer het niet lukt even een seintje geven.
gpserror (2021-09-27 18:06:37+00:00): hey could you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389462508 ? does this look right?
gpserror (2021-09-29 22:43:28+00:00): No response - I fixed it
Владимир К (2021-11-25 14:30:49+00:00): со спутниковых снимков яндекса брать информацию нельзя.
Polarbear (2024-06-19 14:18:53+00:00): Hi, 
kann es sein, dass du das falsche Gebäude weggeputzt hast?
Vielleicht lag es an der verkehrten Hausnummer.
Dieses hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/308793026/history
ist 12 E und nicht 12 G und steht auf den aktuellen Luftbildern noch. 
Das tatsächliche 12G und das 12F sind im Luftbildvergleich wirklich verschwunden. 
Habs restauriert.
dx125 (2024-06-19 14:44:27+00:00): Moin,
ja genau so wars.
Die OSM note lautete (soweit ich mich erinnere): 12G abgerissen.
Ich war sogar mal vor Ort und habe diese frisch beräumte Fläche gesehen von weitem, war aber zu faul auszusteigen, um das zu Fuß abzulaufen...  
Danke für Deine Korrektur.
gpserror (2021-09-28 18:42:42+00:00): Hi, Welcome and thanks for adding buildings.  One thing that may help out - there's an option in the iD editor, if you rightclick on a building/house you can select "square" which will automatically make the corners right angles with each other.  If it makes sense it will make nice rectangular buildings that looks more professionally drawn.  It's not absolutely necessary but makes a neater product.  Thanks!
wkdgs (2021-09-20 10:18:37+00:00): Hi,

ich denke hier kann man durchaus den Tag "lit=yes" vergeben. Die Straßenlampen auf der anderen Seite beleuchten ja wahrscheinlich auch die gegenüberliegende Spur.

Habe diesem Teilstück und einigen weiteren daher den Tag "lit=yes" verpasst.

LG
winkeldings
maraf24 (2021-10-01 19:11:39+00:00): Skończyli, choć jeszcze wjazdy zastawione.
Pt873 (2021-09-19 19:26:19+00:00): Oi, tudo bem? Posso perguntar qual a diferença entre a sinalização feita no ponto 7010342640 e a que estava anteriormente? (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7010342640/history)
Pegasus21 (2021-09-20 14:03:52+00:00): Good morning! We were trained to mark crossings as either 'uncontrolled' or as 'traffic_signals' so that's really the only difference.
Sandal man (2021-09-20 06:35:51+00:00): Como siempre, gracias por modificar el OSM, pero ¿dibujaste un edificio sin etiquetas y estableciste un nodo "type = building"?
Tienes que poner "building = yes" en el edificio.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/984467203
erral (2021-09-20 07:53:20+00:00): Pues juraría haberles puesto a todos las mismas etiquetas que tenían el resto de edificios... pero se me habrán escapado. Los voy a corregir.
Sandal man (2021-09-20 08:23:01+00:00): Muy bien :-)
ivanbranco (2022-08-27 10:35:32+00:00): Ciao,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5949445530/history

questo bar si chiama davvero "No Name"?
user_7073950 (2022-08-27 12:03:18+00:00): Si, anche se sembra strano ma si, hanno anche le magliette con scritto "no Name "
ivanbranco (2022-08-27 12:05:10+00:00): Grazie per la risposta!

Aggiungo una nota così non viene il dubbio anche ad altri mapper. Buon mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-09 07:35:55+00:00): Hello!

You used
material=metal+
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6697685815/history

Have you maybe meant
material=metal
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
Günter-CW (2024-03-09 11:20:58+00:00): Thanks for finding and pointing out to me my typo (yes, I meant "metal"). I've corrected the typo.
Frans S (2021-09-18 10:41:16+00:00): Hello. 
You mapped here buildings however I cannot finde proof that these traces are buildings.
You should expect some shadows here that proofs that the objects are above groundlevel.
Please check and remove them if you agree.
Best regard
(I validate this task. You can open this changeset to modify mappings)
eggie (2021-09-17 21:21:23+00:00): Beste multichill.
Wanneer er seperatie fietspaden zijn natuurlijk prima, maar je kunt dan beter wachten met het op slot zetten van de fietsroutes. Nu routeren de routes niet meer.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-17 21:26:00+00:00): Voorlopig even bicycle=use_sidepath verwijderd.
Eerst moeten de knooppuntroute worden verlegd. 

Gr eggie
eggie (2021-09-17 21:46:02+00:00): De fietsroutes heb ik verlegd naar het fietspad. Hoofdrijbaan staat weer op slot. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-17 22:01:32+00:00): Nu zijn gelijk die uitzonderingen voor fietsers om linksaf te slaan simpel opgelost en routeert het beter. 
Voor brommers moet het nog wel worden toegevoegd aan de afslagbeperking. 
gr eggie
eggie (2021-09-17 22:05:41+00:00): except =moped afslag beperkingen  naar links toegevoegd.
multichill (2021-09-17 22:35:16+00:00): Bedankt voor je hulp
Martin Constantino–Bodin (2021-09-19 10:50:21+00:00): Bonjour,
Pensez à laisser un message significatif, surtout lorsque les modifications couvrent une zone aussi large : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications Merci d’avance ! Tel quel, vos modifications sont très difficile à évaluer : vous avez surtout enlevé des objets, en fait.

Aussi, pensez à diviser si possible vos modifications en plusieurs modifications plus locales : dans vos modifications, il y a des modifications en France, mais aussi à Port Blair. Ceci fait que toutes les personnes entre les deux (en Inde, en Moyen-Orient, dans le Nord de l’Afrique, etc.) sont inutilement notifiées. Merci d’avance !
crosstato (2021-09-18 02:17:24+00:00): Correct changeset comment: added park amenities and building types
mariotomo (2021-09-20 20:55:08+00:00): changing unclassified→service is typical mapping for the renderer. please do not do this. we have a community on Telegram, and you are a member, but you're not using the channel. please do coordinate your actions with the local mappers, thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111352859
mariotomo (2021-09-20 20:56:51+00:00): please do not reclassify to 'service' just like that. it's not helping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111353149
Tomas Straupis (2021-09-18 05:26:08+00:00): Labas. O kas yra cycleway:right=separate? Mes savo laiku buvom suderinę dvi reikšmes - lane - juosta gatvėje ir track - atskiras takas. https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai
JustinasT (2021-09-18 11:16:30+00:00): Sveikas. Uždėjau kaip papildomą informaciją, kad dviračių takas jau pažymėtas atskirame vektoriuje. Tikslas buvo išvengti dvigubo tako atvaizdavimo Cycle Map ir CyclOSM sluoksniuose
Tomas Straupis (2021-09-18 13:33:32+00:00): Iš principo nėra tokio žymėjimo, kad „dvirtakis pažymėtas atskirai“. Jei dviračių vektorių tikrai tikrai tikrai tikrai būtina buvo braižyti (paprastai tai žiauriai sumakaluoja visą žemėlapį), tai tada nuo kelio vektoriaus reikia nuimti visas dviračių žymas :-)
Arnaud Champollion (2021-12-22 08:32:59+00:00): Bonjour,
Ce bâtiment semble ne plus être une gare aujourd'hui.
Je propose de :
- passer le tag "name" en "old_name" et enlever du coup le mot "Ancienne".
- passer le tag "station" en "disused:station"
trial (2021-12-22 12:11:48+00:00): Bonjour Arnaud, j'avais laissé le nom, ce n'est pas moi ;-) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112519675/history : si c'est comme ça qu'elle est connue.
Dans le principe je suis d'accord (c'est ce que j'aurais fait).
Building=train_station doit rester : c'est l'architecture et l'architecture est conservée. Tu peux ajouter disused:railway=station
trial (2021-12-22 12:14:41+00:00): Si tu es dans le coin : le passage à niveau existe encore ?
Arnaud Champollion (2021-12-22 13:15:14+00:00): Ha OK en fait je pensais que tous les contributeurs ayant agi sur le changeset recevaient le message. Mais c'est idiot en fait car le changeset concerne plusieurs objets et inversement.
Arnaud Champollion (2021-12-22 13:18:06+00:00): Je ne me souviens pas avoir été récemment arrêté par une barrière à ce niveau-là, mais ça ne veut pas dire qu'il n'y a pas de passage à niveau (du moins la structure), en tout cas aucun passage à niveau fonctionnel, puisque les trains ne roulent pas. Je regarderai la prochaine fois que j'y passe.
Arnaud Champollion (2021-12-22 13:19:38+00:00): Je me demande si ça ne serait pas plus utile si on pouvait commenter l'historique d'un objet plutôt que le changset.
trial (2021-12-22 18:53:32+00:00): Pour aller plus vite : installer OSM Smart Menu sur son navigateur favori.
Sélectionner l'objet problématique :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112519675
Du coup on a plusieurs affichages proposés :
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/112519675
on voit que c'est la version 2 qui a ajouté le tag
Sympa un hyper lien vers le changeset "fautif" https://osmcha.org/changesets/15137593/
https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/112519675
même style, plus compact
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/112519675
la même chose + la géométrie
https://osmcha.org/changesets/15137593/
juste 2 versions ?
Arnaud Champollion (2021-12-22 19:36:02+00:00): Ah mais c'est super cette extension. Je me l'installe tout de suite.
Merci,
trial (2021-12-22 20:21:37+00:00): Je confirme et tu peux facilement l'étendre, Cf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Smart_Menu et https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:OSM_Smart_Menu (je pense que tu seras sensible aussi à l'accès aux diverses couches de Geoportail
mariotomo (2021-09-21 13:09:40+00:00): please do not reclassify roads that you cannot observe. what is your base for "service" roads between settlements?
mariotomo (2021-09-21 13:30:09+00:00): also, from the geometry of your contribution, I wonder what you are using as guide. you used lots of nodes, adding corners that aren't there, on road sections that are almost straight according to Maxar, and you did not add shallow bends on others. the combination of the two styles makes me wonder.
Glassman (2021-09-19 00:35:55+00:00): #TIP: Square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111353922
mariotomo (2021-09-20 20:11:29+00:00): hi. please at least in Panamá, do try to describe your changesets with "verb-of-action + object specification", like it would be "extending rural roads", "adding residential areas", or "fixing geometry of landuse". thank you.
(you added an 'access=private' to a road mapped by a local hiker. that I do consider inappropriate from a remote mapper, and I will undo it.)
mariotomo (2021-09-20 20:22:43+00:00): I'm reviewing in finer detail, and I'm surprised by the low quality. can you please get in contact with the community? thank you!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111354026
mariotomo (2021-10-08 20:02:09+00:00): todavía esperándote.
volví a este conjunto de cambios porque veo 'highway=track' que sin entrar en los cultivos cruzan y conectan poblados.