piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Botnik13 (2021-02-23 22:18:39+00:00): Ok, informal ist für die Trampelpfade sicher richtig, das ändere ich morgen. Private würde aber doch bedeuten, dass der Zugang verboten ist. Es gibt aber kein Schild und keinen Zaun und eine Wiese darf man in Bayern betreten, das wäre also meiner Meinung nach übers Ziel hinaus geschossen.
Gruß, Botnik13
limes11 (2021-02-23 22:41:42+00:00): Bin da kein Experte, denke aber, dass landwirtschaftlich genutzte Wiesen zumindest im Frühjahr/Sommer nicht betreten werden dürfen, Schilder oder Zaun sind dabei nicht wichtig. Bin aber kein Bayer, also vielleicht gibt's da wieder andere Regeln :)

Die Ursache des Problems liegt wohl in der Treppe, die von Wanderern umgangen wird. Da sollte sich der Besitzer an die zuständige Gemeinde/Forstamt wenden und das Problem diskutieren
Botnik13 (2021-02-24 06:28:08+00:00): Ja, das ist in Bayern tatsächlich so, dass man in der freien Natur alles betreten darf, was nicht abgesperrt oder beschildert ist. Die informal-Flags sind gesetzt.
Vielen Dank für die Beantwortung meiner Fragen!
Gruß, Botnik13
Botnik13 (2021-02-24 18:38:20+00:00): Hallo Limes,
wer schließt jetzt eigentlich die Note? Ich kann das ja wohl eher nicht machen, oder? Sorry, ist meine erste. :-)
Gruß, Botnik13
ToniE (2021-01-13 21:24:39+00:00): Hi,

wollte gerade was zu stop_area_group schreiben und musste nach Lektüre von

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Public_Transport&oldid=625726

feststellen, das die dort nicht definiert ist.

Alles prima.
map per (2021-01-14 07:12:22+00:00): Hallo Toni,

ich wollte dich sowiso schon fragen, was du von stop_area_group hältst. In München scheinen die ja häufig genutzt zu werden. Bei Haltestellen mit einer U-Bahn Haltestelle und einer Bushaltestelle erscheint mir das unnötig kompliziert. Und da die Definition von stop_area_group unklar zu seien scheint dürfte auch das Risiko bestehen, das Kartenprogramme damit nicht umgehen können.

Danke und viele Grüße
map per
ToniE (2021-01-14 09:03:35+00:00): Hi,

stop_area_group habe ich noch nicht abgelegt (glaub' ich) - zu komplex und Sinn erschließt sich mir nicht.

stop_area habe ich mehrfach ergänzt, weils in PTv2 derfiniert ist, aber der Nutzen ...? Evtl. öpnvkarte.de, ...

Bei den Kartenprogrammen geht's hoffentlich so: was ich nicht kenne ignoriere ich.

D.h. aber: ist der name= eine Haltestelle nur in dessen stop_area und weder an der stop_position und platform, dann haben Programme, die mit stop_area nicht umgehen können/wollen ein Problem - daher bin ich diesbezüglich für Redundanz.
Das gilt auch für 'network' an route-Relationen, wenn 'network' an dessen 'route_master' gemapped ist. Manche Tools kennen 'route_master' aber nicht.
Viele Grüße,
Toni
ToniE (2021-01-14 09:32:29+00:00): ... na gut, was ich bezüglich stop_area_group mitgenommen habe:

ZB. München, der Ostbahnhof:

- Busse: 'Ostbahnhof'
- Tram: 'Ostbahnhof'
- U-Bahn: 'Ostbahnhof'
- S-Bahn: 'Ostbahnhof'
- DB: 'München Ost'

und Hauptbahnhof analog ...

Die Haltestellen haben unterschiedliche Namen, meinen aber logisch gesehen die selbe Location. Dafür wäre die stop_area_group gut (welcher 'name' - keiner), da die stop_areas auch unterschiedliche 'name' haben.
map per (2021-01-14 13:09:25+00:00): Danke
axelr (2021-01-14 12:16:30+00:00): Ich fordere dich auf, die Quelle für deine Gebäudeverschiebungen zu benennen.
Die NRW-Othophotos zeigen nicht deine Dachkannten. Ich habe den Verdacht, dass du illegale Quellen verwendest.
zuicz (2021-01-18 11:12:09+00:00): Nie było jeszcze przetargu? Był, ale tylko na jezdnię?
maro21 (2021-01-18 18:29:21+00:00): Nie można budować torów na wiadukcie, jeśli nie ma jeszcze wiaduktu. W powietrzu ich przecież nie budują.
zuicz (2021-01-18 21:34:36+00:00): Hm, o ile wiem to tak nie działa. Ale może lepiej spytajmy na forum?
Mordechai23 (2021-01-24 09:19:09+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=14985&p=225
zuicz (2021-01-24 14:46:04+00:00): No właśnie, zatem zmiana do wycofania
Carnildo (2021-01-14 08:06:52+00:00): Looks like what's visible in the latest Sentinel imagery, but that's barely got sufficient resolution to spot roads.
axelr (2021-01-14 12:06:11+00:00): Wir zeichnen Häuser nach ihrem Erdgeschoss-Grundriss auf. Wenn du die Häuser aus Luftbild auf die Dachfläche erweiterst, ist dies eine Verschlechterung unseres Datenbestandes. Soll dir jemand beim Revert helfen ? Dein Änderungssatz-Kommentar ist nichtssagend.
Shaun das Schaf (2021-01-17 17:02:15+00:00): Hallo Lila05, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Es gibt "Gundelfingen an der Donau" und "Gundenfingen" bei Freiburg. Letzteres hast du in "Gundelfingen donau" umbenannt. Ich nehme an, das war ein versehen oder...?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1970193/history

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
luiswoo (2021-01-13 22:51:15+00:00): Ну окай, буду молча откатывать ваши правки.
2GarinZmei (2021-01-14 07:40:04+00:00): Вроде указал, все, что не так, подскажите, конкретно где и что в таких случаях делать, чтобы основной маршрут по таким местам не прокладывал, я начинающий редактор.
luiswoo (2021-01-14 15:01:01+00:00): В онлайн редакторе ID (есть ещё офлайн редакторы JOSM и прочие)
Тип объекта
Поля 
Ограничение скорости: *** ввести цифру. (желательно указать для всех улиц города)
Число полос: *** ввести цифру (не то, что бы очень нужно, но тоже желательно.)
Дорожное покрытие: выбрать из пунктов. (желательно указать для всех улиц города)
Проходимость: выбрать из пунктов. (внедорожник, к примеру.)

Это основные параметры дороги.
Если это всё не вводить, будет вести не по лучшему, а как короче.

Нормальный навигатор не потащит пузотёрку по highway=track если там не указанно минимум гравийное покрытие. Достаточно покрытия на улице "без покрытия", что бы там не оказываться. В теории.
Что делать, если по настройкам навигатора тащит по любой линии с тегом highway, без понятия.

Добавить в виде тегов, то, чего нет в заготовках или посмотреть значения пунктов заготовок тегов. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:maxspeed https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:smoothness

Связность дорожного графа:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Additional_rules_to_highway_classification
Ну и наконец, для чего нужен "доступ"  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access
Что такое полевая дорога https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
2GarinZmei (2021-01-15 20:36:05+00:00): Спасибо, все указал
farhad_y (2021-02-04 18:53:59+00:00): تعدادی کوچه و نقطه اشتباها حذف شده.
لطفاه به نسخه قبلی برگردید.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-01 17:09:49+00:00): ao adicionar vias, lembre-se de colocar a superficie e se o acesso é privado, isso é muito importante.
Prt_An (2021-01-13 21:54:23+00:00): Hello. 
Please try to submit changes limited to one geographic region/place at a time. Your edit makes it look like it's spanning over the world. That makes it harder to spot what exactly changed on the map.
mikkolukas (2021-01-13 22:01:17+00:00): Also for correcting obvious typos, where the exact changes are described in the changeset description?
mikkolukas (2021-01-13 22:02:12+00:00): - or du you mean to maybe group them into a bit smaller regions and span them over maybe 4-5 changesets?
mikkolukas (2021-01-13 22:02:18+00:00): do*
WoodWoseWulf (2021-01-19 04:20:51+00:00): Hiya GREGMAP1,

Just wanted to ask about those leisure=park nodes that you created in this changeset with name=1, name=2 and name=3 ... all on houses.

Could they possibly be the result of an error?
SekeRob (2021-01-26 11:51:41+00:00): I've reverted to your old coding minus the typo for your rendering. :O). FYI, if you create an area, highway or foot, and paths run across ID editor would alert you asking to connect the area and the pathways, if it doesn't you know before saving that something is amiss. It did now. Many things don't actually render in standard history view, but if you switch into editor mode and then choose Openstreetmap (standard) background you see it showing.

PS There's a daily 'typo' report and you can see your own daily coding problems at https://hdyc.neis-one.org/?philippec . Click on the QA levels links to see the details. I try to fix mine daily, reports refresh around 11:30 AM

Happy mapping 'daar in België'
philippec (2021-01-26 11:56:09+00:00): Yes, I should not drink and map :)
SekeRob (2021-01-26 11:59:09+00:00): PS area:highway has 155000 uses
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/area:highway , a great place to see if something is courant and how often used, also a good place to search for alternate tagging.

🖖
kagebar (2023-03-31 17:04:34+00:00): що це за маршрут? ніде в інтернеті про нього не знайшов ніякої інформації
kapazao (2021-01-13 23:38:40+00:00): Hola, has dibujado un parque sobre una plaza. Esta zona es una plaza, no un parque, y si quisieras ponerla como parque tendrías que cambiar la plaza, no poner un parque encima.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97466170
Jakka (2021-01-14 10:26:53+00:00): Indien dit goed waarneembare paden wegen zijn.... door het verwijderen ervan belet niet dat ze in de toekomst er terug opkomen. Laat deze staan en tag deze met access=private
Privé wegen zijn ook herkenningspunten onderweg ;)
toonSAIL (2021-01-14 10:30:25+00:00): hartelijk dank voor reactie. 
is dit ook zo voor opritten? 
Mvg
Jakka (2021-01-14 10:37:52+00:00): Voor korte zou ik da misschien zelf niet doen. Maar is toegelaten dan zou dat zoiets zijn als highway=service service=driveway access=private ;) alle mogelijk tag in editor kan je op het i meerdere info vinden
toonSAIL (2021-01-14 10:39:20+00:00): bedankt voor de informatie
mueschel (2021-01-15 10:22:26+00:00): Please check the fountain tags you added - there are several with spelling mistakes like 'foutain' or 'fountaine'.
cabinetcourbi (2021-01-15 19:12:39+00:00): yes tired ;-)
frosm (2021-01-13 22:38:37+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
si vous souhaitiez envoyer une trace gps, vous n'avez pas choisit la bonne option.
vous avez créé un way par dessus tout ce qui existe (donc aussi en doublon de tout ce qui existe).
je vous conseille de commencer par plus simple que faire tout un itinéraire. par exemple ajouter un bout de chemin manquant dans openstreetmap.
ce n'est que quand tous les bouts de chemin sont renseigné qu'il est possible de faire un itinéraire, du moins si votre trace représente un circuit précis et n'est pas simplement un choix libre à chaque carrefour.
bonne continuation
lbuisson (2021-01-13 23:07:01+00:00): comment je peux supprimer tout ce trajet car j'ai créé sur un autre modèle les chemins manquants
frosm (2021-01-14 00:24:41+00:00): sélectionné le chemin en question, touche effacer, envoyer
frosm (2021-01-14 00:25:21+00:00): apparemment vous avez entre temps réussit à l'effacer :)
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-14 08:31:21+00:00): Ciao. historic=pass non è un tag documentato. Il tag corretto probabilmente è natural=saddle: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dsaddle Il tag website rappresenta "the full URL to the official website for the related features". Non mi risulta che gli elementi naturali possano avere un website ufficiale ;-) Ciao, Andrea.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97467153
blackboxlogic (2021-01-16 00:31:40+00:00): Seems odd to have addr: tags but not have addr:housenumber. I've made an adjustment here by merging the building with the address node.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97587532
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97467205
blackboxlogic (2021-01-16 00:33:35+00:00): It seems unlikely that this building is named "private". I've changed them. If you want to change them back, please include a reference to where you found that name published.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97467253
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-14 08:40:31+00:00): Ciao. "Passo d'Avenco" non è il nome della strada. Pertanto non è corretto mettere il tag name su questa feature. Usa il tag natural=saddle in corrispondenza del punto più basso che caratterizza il passo e aggiungi su questo elemento il tag name. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97467342
ottwiz (2021-12-02 07:17:49+00:00): Retraced https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3881986 as you wrote "fixme=retrace" but i also noticed that the polygon wasn't aligned
xronos (2021-01-14 12:32:13+00:00): Поаккуратнее с удалениями, пожалуйста. Есть вопрос к удалению lit: 
Может вместо удаления стоило заменить на:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lit:perceived
brianboru (2021-01-14 18:34:37+00:00): Which streetlevel imagery did you use?  
Can a cyclist follow this advisory route using dedicated cycle route signs?
Bphillips96 (2021-01-15 12:57:18+00:00): The source was Birmingham City Council, but I did check using Google Street View. I realise now this is not best practice.
There are painted cycle symbols on the road which a cyclist can follow.
brianboru (2021-01-16 10:11:44+00:00): Great that you've recognised not to use GSV. You can generate you own streetview using an app from either mapillary or openstreetcam on your smartphone. Once uploaded the images are available to anyone. There might be some in your area although they might not be up to date.
Don't confuse cycling infrastructure with with cycle route. Painted signs on the road surface(known as 1057s) don't indicate  routes, they are for safety awareness
It may be that BCC has put them in as advisory routes only rather  than named and signed LCNs like the Rea Valley Route or Washwood Heath Route.
See this thread contribution recently from talkgb(worth joining if you haven't)
There appear to be a large number of sections of road in some areas of London tagged as ‘cycle route’ that are no more than the occasional 1057 cycle symbol painted on the road.

They are not signed, and do not have any route numbering.

Based on the discussion it appears
- most were added by user MacLondon 
- they were the ‘lowest level’ of route designation by some councils at some time in the past. Pick some ‘useful routes’ on ‘quiet roads’ and just paint some symbols on them for people to follow 

Some of these appear on the last 2015 TfL cycle maps in yellow (routes were blue) keyed as ‘other roads recommended by cyclists’ 
 
My opinion is
- these are not followable on the ground 
- they do not meet TfL or borough quality criteria (and thus do not appear on any more recent maps) eg - they are not shown in any way on Lambeth councils 2017 cycle map https://www.lambeth.gov.uk/parking-transport-and-streets/cycling/lambeth-cycle-routes-map
- they decrease legibility of the map because they create a mass of dense blue lines from which it’s hard to pick out genuinely useful routes.
- they probably have a negative impact on routing engines as they are likely treated equally to actual signposted routes. 
- in many cases where they do show the most direct route through backstreets that is likely to be the busiest with rat running traffic as it’s where google and Waze will send drivers. 
No-one on the thread disagreed
Ultimately it's your judgment call - you know your area but my advice would be to err on the side of caution and not enter lcn route relations unless there are named direction signs to follow.
Bphillips96 (2021-01-18 17:37:55+00:00): Thanks for your help, I think perhaps the tag cycleway=shared_lane would be more appropriate then. With that tag the infrastructure is readable as it does add some benefit to wayfinding, despite that being minimal at best.
It seems a number of cycle routes (with a few notable exceptions) in Birmingham are currently marked on OSM as routes, but are made up of 1057s and/or bus lanes, with some other infrastructure e.g. at major junctions. I will review those I am familiar with.
Therefore, on this route the best way forward seems to me to be deleting the route and adding 'shared lane' tags to the streets.
user_5359 (2021-01-14 05:35:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You upload different gpx tracks without any OSM key. Please also check always the connection between the new and existing highways.
sravy (2022-04-18 11:36:02+00:00): Hi Fadlilaa IRM-ED,
I hope your doing well,Thanks for the edits.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97468411
Adiatma IRM-RV (2022-04-20 05:12:24+00:00): Hi Sravya!
I hope you do, too. 
Please let us know if you find any questionable edits from our end. Thank you!
Cheers.
abakus_uploader (2021-01-14 23:32:15+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
KPull (2021-01-14 14:38:00+00:00): Hi! Thanks for your contribution. I have had to revert your changes since you inadvertently moved the position of a number of streets in Mosta and Attard.

Since I am familiar with Gino Galea's photo studio myself, I have marked the photo studio correctly on the map here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8321436631. I've also added details that I can see on the website. Use the Edit button if you'd like to add more information.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97469300
philippec (2021-01-15 17:01:39+00:00): Je hebt u kunnen inhouden :)
Nog 2 dagen voor de kant Raghenoplein.
philippec (2021-01-15 17:02:28+00:00): Ik had ze zelfs geteld.
SPQRobin (2021-01-17 16:07:04+00:00): Amai, daar had ik niet naar gekeken! Nogal een werkje, die allemaal tellen.

Ben benieuwd naar de afbraak van het station een dezer dagen.
philippec (2021-01-17 16:08:58+00:00): Vijf jaar geleden heb ik het in orde gebracht voor heel Mechelen stad.  Maar ik heb het niet onderhouden.
arichnad (2021-11-11 20:00:16+00:00): Hello, regarding the courts here in this edit, I don't see pickleball listed.  Also, Arlington's website doesn't list pickleball.  Am I misunderstanding?  Thanks!
bernardo60 (2021-04-22 09:15:26+00:00): Hi. I passed this area today on my mountain bike to check out this path. It's very very narrow, only a footpath between rice fields. Bali is full of paths used by motorbikes, therefore it is better to mark these ways as footpaths if not verified on the ground. I come across this kind of situations frequently. Thanks
whatmeinfallible (2021-04-22 17:55:33+00:00): Understood, thank you.
naveenpf (2021-01-14 02:26:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala

Please square the buildings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97470498
naveenpf (2021-01-14 02:25:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97470503
Kovoschiz (2021-01-14 11:17:53+00:00): Lai Chi Kok is specifically the cape below the hill. I found some references to a Lai Chi Kok hill, and there's staff quarters of LCK Reception Centre (not counting the hostel), so the `natural=` and `place=` (inhabited) could be separated.
Kovoschiz (2021-01-14 11:18:47+00:00): Also "Lai Chi Kok" in this case could refer to the entire hill body, not exactly the peak.
Kovoschiz (2021-01-14 11:20:24+00:00): Most importantly please don't tag this `source=`
Kovoschiz (2021-01-14 11:25:52+00:00): `natural=saddle` and `mountain_pass=yes` are different as well.
Kovoschiz (2021-01-14 11:27:37+00:00): Ma Yau Tong appears to be large enough to be a `=village`
Q8ba2di0Pa (2021-01-14 04:13:23+00:00): 안녕하세요 ghkdgnstjr1님, 서울춘천고속도로 홈페이지 정보 및 한국도로공사 노선 안내에 따르면 강일 IC부터 서울양양고속도로가 시작하는 것으로 나와있습니다. 또한 국토교통부에서 제공하는 vworld 상에서도 해당 구간을 서울양양고속도로로 표기하고 있습니다. 이러한 점을 미루어 보았을 때 비록 요금은 징수하지 않지만 고속도로로 보아도 괜찮지 않을까요?
Q8ba2di0Pa (2021-01-14 04:31:28+00:00): On the ground rule로 엄밀히 따지려면 미사 IC 근처에 있는 서울양양고속도로(60) 시점 표지판 및 종점 표지판을 기준으로 구간을 나누어도 괜찮을 것 같습니다.
Q8ba2di0Pa (2021-01-14 04:37:14+00:00): 그리고 도로공사에서 배포하는 수도권 고속도로 안내지도에는 선동교차로, 미사 IC, 미사대교 구간을 민자고속도로로 분류하고 있습니다. 매핑에 참고하시면 좋을 것 같습니다.
user_5239402 (2021-01-14 04:41:08+00:00): 강일 나들목 - 미사대교 사이 약 1.9km 구간은 대통령령으로만 고속도로로 지정되어 있고, 덕소삼패IC가 1번인것과 명목상 시/종점인 강일JC가 아닌 IC로 보아하니 서울양양선에는 포함되지는 않는것으로 보입니다. 이는 경부간선도로와 비슷한 관계입니다. 거리뷰를 확인해보니 미사 교차로에서 시점 표지판이 있으니 미사대교만 해당하는것 같습니다. 하지만 시종점 비석은 덕소삼패 남쪽에 있습니다.
Q8ba2di0Pa (2021-01-14 05:56:31+00:00): 먼저 경부간선도로는 지정해제된 고속도로 구간이나, 강일나들목-미사대교 구간은 고속도로로 '지정'되어 있습니다.

그리고 IC에 번호가 안붙어있는 경우도 고속도로 정보를 보다 보면 가끔 있는 일입니다. 대개 어느 무료 도로와 연결되는 경우죠. (e.g. 인천국제공항고속도로)

마찬가지로 강일나들목-미사대교  구간은 고속화도로로 운영되고 있다고 합니다.

시종점 비석은 있다고는 인터넷에서 본 것 같아요, 그런데 사진이나 내용이 구체적으로 어떻게 되어 있는지에 대한 정보는 찾아볼 수 없었어요. 로드뷰에서 공사 기념 석 같이 보이는걸 찾았으나, 내용이 어떻게 되어 있는지는 확인할 수 없었습니다. (http://kko.to/VI7xOHuYB) 그리고 저는 도로에 설치된 시종점 표지판이 도로를 알 수 있는 가장 공식적이고 명확한 정보라고 생각합니다.

종점 표지판: http://kko.to/ihFoOHqDj
시점 표지판: http://kko.to/zhbMhHqYT

무엇보다도 미사대로를 이용하려면 덕소삼패나TG나 남양주 TG 등에서 반드시 고속도로 운영사에 돈을 내야 한다는 점에서 미사 IC 이후로는 명확하게 서울양양고속도로라고 말할 수 있을 것 같습니다. (http://www.schighway.co.kr/homepage/highway/fee_info.do)
Q8ba2di0Pa (2021-01-14 05:58:24+00:00): 마지막에 문단 미사대로(X)가 아닌 미사대교(O) 입니다. 오타를 내어 죄송합니다..ㅠㅠ
user_5239402 (2021-01-14 08:42:11+00:00): 서울양양선이 강일에서 시작한다면 강일IC가 아니라 강일JC로 붙는것과 선동IC나 미사IC로 표지판에 쓰여있는것이 아닌 선동교차로,미사교차로 로 표기가 되어있는것을 보아하니 강일-미사교차로까진 미사대로에 속하고 미사교차로 부터 서울양양선에 속해있는것 같습니다. 그래서 미사대교를 고속도로 로 태그하고 통행료를 없음이라고 편집하면 될것 같고 미사대로 구간을 alt_name에 서울양양고속도로로 표기하면 될것 같습니다.
Q8ba2di0Pa (2021-01-14 09:19:54+00:00): 미사대교 진입하면 나갈 때 돈을 내야 하는 구조라서요, 미사대교는 유로로 태그하겠습니다.
Q8ba2di0Pa (2021-01-14 09:20:28+00:00): 미사대교 진입 -> 양양 방면만요.
Q8ba2di0Pa (2021-01-14 09:26:12+00:00): 아 그런데 덕소 삼패 TG에서 미사대교 방면으로도 돈내고 이용하니까 유로로 할게요..
Q8ba2di0Pa (2021-01-14 09:29:26+00:00): 새주소 참고했을 때 미사대로랑 미사대교 방면 분기되는 지점에서 미사대로가 갈라지네요. 이 부분 고려해서 이 갈라지는 부분을 기점으로 서울양양고속도로 잡을게용.
Allison P (2021-01-14 05:46:32+00:00): I doubt this park is really called "Park (Private)". If it doesn't have a name and it's not publicly accessible, add noname=yes and access=private.
jackthetoolboy (2021-01-14 14:40:56+00:00): Thanks, new at this!
tastrax (2021-01-24 06:57:04+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Rom1 (2021-01-14 14:51:20+00:00): Bonjour, que diriez-vous d'utiliser plutôt le tag opening_hours:covid19 pour ce changement d'horaires qui n'est finalement lié qu'au couvre-feu ? Merci.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2021-01-14 15:36:37+00:00): Bonjour Rom1,

Merci pour la remarque pertinente mais malheureusement Il nous faudrait un développement spécifique et pour le moment, c'est assez compliqué de le mettre en place.
Par ailleurs, le réseau nous envoie les horaires comme des horaires dit " normaux" comme indiqué sur leur site :
https://www.yves-rocher.fr/tout-sur-les-magasins/grand-est/laxou/laxou/S-FRYROC650

Cordialement,
L'Equipe DB