piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MFlamm (2020-04-26 08:53:16+00:00): Hello, you are indicating that your map improvements are based on maps of the swiss federal office of Topography. This is not a legitimate source, because it is not allowed to copy informations from their maps into OSM. Please stop copying other maps! (and read again the fundamental terms that you agreed upon when registering. See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright
Vinber (2020-03-28 09:09:28+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
ma-rt-in (2020-03-27 11:22:14+00:00): Hallo,
ist der Weg 27751429 tatsächlich für Radfahrer per Schild oder Verordnung freigeben?
vg
ulion (2020-03-27 14:02:20+00:00): Hallo,
drücken wir es andersherum aus: Auf diesem Weg ist das Radfahren nicht per Schild verboten oder explizit einer ausschließlichen Nutzung durch andere Verkehrsteilnehmer  zugewiesen.
LGU
ma-rt-in (2020-03-27 15:23:04+00:00): Hallo,
somit benötigt der Weg auch nicht den tag bicycle=* in irgendeiner Form. Ich werde das mal fixen.
vg
Frans S (2020-03-29 15:10:38+00:00): Hello.
A remark. In the peru project  8217
you mapped buildings and every building you gave it a name"  #hotosm-project-7707 #missingmaps #indonesia #redcross #amm #macau #CC'
This is not correct. It seems that you added this automatically.
Please correct this error
Thanks
Frans S (2020-03-29 15:14:32+00:00): Another issue
Please square all your mapped buildings with the Q key in ID editor
Thanks
canfe (2020-03-30 07:42:23+00:00): Grazie
Eifelkobold! (2021-08-28 21:50:09+00:00): Guten Abend,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass du in diesem Änderungssatz die Waschstraße Schodel sowie zwei Büros (MR-Ingenieurgesselschaft und Witax) in der Peterheide eingetragen hast. Woher hast du diese Informationen?

viele Grüße

Eifelkobold
Andreas Binder (2020-03-27 10:55:35+00:00): Die Werte für opening_hours 
opening_hours=Mi-So 9-20 Uhr
opening_hours=Di-So 8 - 0.00
passen nicht. Hier müsste es stattdessen heißen:
opening_hours=We-Su 09:00-20:00
opening_hours=Tu-Su 08:00-00:00
Genauere Infos zur Schreibweise bei opening_hours findest du hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
Kovoschiz (2020-03-28 06:56:15+00:00): I don't think this is the best solution as the place should be located on its center, and print maps position labels besides the place to not obstruct the view over it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82709712
mueschel (2020-03-27 13:37:16+00:00): Hi
I found several 'name:ladino' tags in the last days. To tag names in different languages, we use the language codes as they are defined in ISO 639. So, the correct key is 'name:lld'. 
I just fixed a couple, please check if I got all of them.

Cheers
Jan
user_11166885 (2020-07-31 16:48:41+00:00): Boscarol non è un fast-food, bensì un ristorante/paninoteca.
David Crochet (2020-03-27 17:00:40+00:00): Merci pour cette première contribution
mavl (2020-03-27 19:21:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты.  
Пожалуйста, обратите внимание на соглашение по вводу номеров зданий, которое применяется в России:  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
josmougn (2020-03-27 21:41:55+00:00): bonjour Weft,
as-tu vérifié sur place que cette boulangerie ne s'appelle pas "Boulangerie" ?
Merci
Weft (2020-03-29 07:28:18+00:00): oui
Polarbear-repair (2020-04-12 00:35:42+00:00): Supermarket name changed contrary to 2019 mapillary images; unexplained street name changes; impassable road blocks contrary to mapillary showing a passable checkpoint.
 
reverted in #83414342
ianlopez1115 (2020-03-27 11:30:21+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
majkaz (2020-05-14 09:49:44+00:00): Prosím Tě, podle čeho to děláš? Všimla jsem si, že je tam přihozeno často fixme, které jednoznačně ukazuje, že to na místě moc neznáš. Konkrétně třeba pochybovat o tom, jestli pomalu 2 m široký chodník se zpevněným povrchem u není pěšina je trochu mimo.
sokol15 (2020-05-14 10:05:20+00:00): Tohle bylo z leteckých snímků, zmíněný chodník je jistě má chyba. Nejspíš jsem váhal kvůli diagonálnímu vedení přes trávu.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-01-16 10:19:40+00:00): لماذا أزيلت العناصر التالية:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/12rp
gurglypipe (2020-03-27 13:02:17+00:00): Hi, and thanks for your contributions! Are you aware that you can press ‘Q’ in the editor, when a building or area is selected, to automatically square up its corners? It makes drawing square buildings a lot easier.
BCNorwich (2020-03-27 15:22:44+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've added layer=-2
tunnel=culvert to the 1.62km stream (Way: 583442282), if this is inadvertent could you please correct it or ask for help doing so.
You've added bridge=yes, layer=1 to the 55m path Way: 311961559.
You've added a tunnel layer=-1 to Way: Farthingale Lane (785069551).
Regarding Way: 785069544 service road, should this be a footway?
From your mapping Way: 785069543 is a bridge over a tunnel, is this correct?

I've pointed these problems out so that you can see the mistakes, hopefully correct them and avoid repeating them.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-03-29 13:15:39+00:00): OK, I've now rectified the anomalies as best I can.
Cfgmi (2020-03-31 13:00:17+00:00): Thanks Bernard.
The road intersections with the stream (5834422820) to the east are all culverts I believe. I may have set these wrongly.
eggie (2020-06-23 21:33:17+00:00): Dag DvdB  .. Is het onverharde gedeelte niet een highway=track tracktype=grade4  ipv een highway=path?
Dus geschikt voor bv landbouwvoertuigen..
In deze changeset had je gewoon een highway=unclassified getekend over het path. We noemen dat duplicated ways. 
Een andere mapper heeft het hersteld.
Je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=82713154

MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-06-23 21:34:32+00:00): In deze changeset is het hersteld https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83011405
mrcn (2020-04-04 22:12:51+00:00): Witam, park wygląda dużo lepiej z alejkami, ale czy nie lepiej by było mapować alejki jako linie (foot path) niż obszary (pedestrian area)? Pozdrowienia - Marcin
bartekl9 (2020-04-04 22:29:10+00:00): Witam
Według mnie lepiej mapować alejki jako obszary ponieważ są szwrokie i tworzą spójną całość z placwm głównym parku.
Pozdrawiam
Bartek
philippec (2020-04-12 11:34:12+00:00): Valt er niets meer over te zeggen ?
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/kijPcUZD17qHtjzoUripJA
Vinber (2020-03-28 09:09:44+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber (2020-03-28 09:12:39+00:00): Et concernant votre demande, qu'est ce que cela signifie :
La modif soyaux est à enlever mais je n'y arrive pas, ainsi que celle du chemin, qui s'est inseree toute seule.

insérée toute seule, il y a peu de chances :)
pouvez vous expliquer ce qui ne vas pas ?

Bonne journée
MatthieuGD (2020-09-22 16:39:55+00:00): Nadège et Vincent, Je suis passé sur le terrain il y a peu.
Je ne vois pas d'erreur qui pose problème, BNP est bien placé par ailleurs.
Steube (2020-04-28 17:21:34+00:00): Hallo Gunni,
Du hast vor kurzem bei diesem Changeset nahe Presseck auf der KU 25 den Straßennamen ergänzt. Beim zufälligen Routen über diese Strecke ist mir aufgefallen, dass der südliche Abschnitt ein vehicle=destination Tag hat und das Routing für Durchgangsverkehr daher über die KU 24 läuft und die KU 25 meidet. Kannst Du dieses Tag bestätigen, oder handelt es sich hier womöglich um einen immer weitergetragenen Fehler?
Freundliche Grüße
Steube
Frans S (2020-04-02 17:47:06+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here
A request. Please square the rectangular buildings with the Q key in IDeditor
You missed quite a number which had to be squared
Best regards
JeroenHoek (2021-12-13 17:16:02+00:00): Is CEMT=(Vb) (between parentheses) correct? This is one of the values that stands out in Taginfo:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/CEMT#values
kannix (2021-12-14 06:45:41+00:00): Hi, if I remember right, this waterway does not exist, yet. To make this clear, I have choosen parentheses.
JeroenHoek (2021-12-14 07:30:44+00:00): Ah I see! That wasn't clear to me. In that case, it may be better to use lifecycle-prefixes for the main key (waterway) and leave the other ones as they will be once the canal is dug. You used waterway:project, but the common approach is to use these prefixes:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

So here that would be CEMT=Vb with planned:waterway=canal (or proposed:waterway=canal).

If the canal is already being dug, you could use waterway=construction with construction=canal.

By leaving the attributes like CEMT and name in the state they will be once finished, other mappers who might update the canal as parts of it are finished won't leave them in the wrong state either.
kannix (2021-12-14 08:25:44+00:00): how about writing
planned:CEMT=Vb ?
Go ahead (as long as this does not pop up on OpenRiverboatMap or my router
https://brouter.grade.de/#map=9/49.8919/2.9074/CARTO,CEMT&lonlats=13.320494,52.524525;13.390317,52.522384 )
JeroenHoek (2021-12-14 08:35:52+00:00): Does your router process CEMT=* without a waterway=*? That sounds like a bug.

Changing this specific one to planned:CEMT is fine, but it is valid for a mapper to use the lifecycle-prefix only on the top-level tag (waterway=* in this case) and set the rest of the attributes as they will be when the object is finished. (Like you wouldn't use planned:name either.) To prevent ghost-routes from popping up in your router you should probably require the presence of waterway=* in addition to CEMT=*.
kannix (2021-12-14 10:31:08+00:00): already done:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Kannix/vector-tiles#fetch_data
Frans S (2020-04-01 13:44:11+00:00): Hello TKillilea. Thanks for mapping here 
A few remarks. Please do not cluster buildings and call it 1 building. Map each individual building as 1 building.
Be consequent in squaring appropriate buildings with the Q key in IDeditor.
Keep an eye on issues in IDeditor and solve them before uploading.
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-04-01 13:45:38+00:00): Here is a web page with the adjustments which has been made by me
Best regards
Valenting01 (2020-03-27 12:47:16+00:00): Ok
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-27 16:53:28+00:00): Hi Like2Map, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several mapped paths? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=82714971

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Like2Map (2020-03-27 18:47:18+00:00): Hi,
The paths I deleted were not accurate or percise. The new paths are located in the correct position.
Thanks
ianlopez1115 (2020-03-27 12:53:08+00:00): See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/29 for added information on this changeset
pitscheplatsch (2020-03-29 12:23:46+00:00): Should be reviewed.
Weired tags?
maraf24 (2020-03-27 15:45:16+00:00): Regarding tags smoothness:date and surface_survey:
* Dates are not in format used in osm - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Date_specification
* surface_survey suggests that survey was made but source suggest otherwise - street level photos were used.
* for both tags dates are probably false - most Mapillary images were not made in March 2020 (OpenStreetCam usually doesn't have any pictures for these areas).
Frans S (2020-04-01 17:22:13+00:00): Hello Fred. Thanks for mapping here.
A few remarks. 
Please map each building individually. Don't cluster buildings and call it 1 building.
Please map tracks only if they lead from hamlets to farmland. No need to map every single track between pieces of farmland. 
Don't forget to square the rectangular buildings youmap with the Q key in IDeditor.
Please pay also attention  on issues in ID  and solve them before uploading. (3 warnings here)
Best regards and keep mapping
Pikse (2020-11-17 14:32:26+00:00): Kattuvad maakasutused tekitavad siin küsimusi. Kaardil paistab, et legendi järgi oleks park justkui murulappide vahel. Viki järgi võiks aru saada nii, et landuse=park on täpsema tähendusega kui landuse=grass ning teist tuleks võimalusel kasutada esimese asemel[1]. Hea oleks eristada maakasutust ja maakatet, aga ma ei tea, kas OSM-is on selleks head lahendust. On ka silt landcover=grass[2], mis võib-olla sobib siia paremini. Kui head lahendust pole, siis võib-olla on parem kaardistamisel liiga detailiseks mitte minna.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landcover=grass
Pikse (2020-11-17 14:35:57+00:00): Või siis ikka niipidi, et landuse=park on täpsema kui landuse=grass ning esimest võiks võimalusel teisele eelistada[1].

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=grass
Claudius Henrichs (2020-03-31 08:08:31+00:00): Hallo,
Kannst du erklären, warum du zahlreiche korrekt nach Verkehrsträger aufgeteilte stop_area-Relationen wieder in Super-stop_areas zusammengefasst hast? Das sorgt für Probleme, da so etwa Halt-Infrastrukturen von Busse, Trams, U- und S-Bahn fehlerhaft in einem stop_area zusammengefasst werden. Da wird dann korrekterweise von Validatoren wie z.B. http://osm-subway.maps.me/austria.html bemängelt.
Luzandro (2020-03-31 13:46:02+00:00): siehe auch Diskussion hier: http://osm-talk-at.1116557.n5.nabble.com/Talk-at-Stop-area-groups-td3337.html
highflyer74 (2020-04-09 11:30:25+00:00): This part of the road is visible here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.063153&lng=8.8996&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=bpwW48VmOg7DKqle0qV6LQ and has been mapped with a barrier=bollard since 2009. So routingwise this should have been no problem (means -> not passible by car anyway) and the change was not really necessary. By adding highway=footway (a dedicated footway, in Germany indicated by a blue sign, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway) you are excluding all others, so this is not a good solution. I have changed it to =path. Please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany.

In general, please be aware that Germany is already mapped to high detail in most parts, so always think twice before doing changes like this.

Thank you!
ravsjith (2020-04-13 01:51:44+00:00): Hi  highflyer74,

replying on behalf of Aepunavy.Thanks for looking into our edit. Your suggestions are very valuable and we are continuously working to improve our editing quality as per community suggestions. Will also pass on this information to our internal team to avoid such edits.

regards,
jithendra raju
Leo Slager (2020-03-28 14:26:33+00:00): Dag Ton,
Met deze changeset heb je ook de huisnummers van diverse gebouwen verwijderd. Ik vraag me af waarom ?
Bestaan die adressen niet meer ?
Leo Slager (2020-03-29 00:02:43+00:00): geen reactie ontvangen.
changeset deels reverted.
Leo Slager (2020-03-27 18:28:45+00:00): Oneway=no is not correct.
I changed it in oneway=yes
abakus_uploader (2020-03-27 23:33:57+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Vinber (2020-04-04 07:57:17+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Mike Baggaley (2020-03-30 22:27:37+00:00): Hi, in this change way 683585004 has been set so that there is no access, but the Thames Path runs along it. Can you add a note to say why it is closed and whether it is likely to reopen?

Thanks,
Mike
ecatmur (2020-03-31 13:18:33+00:00): It's the eastern stage of the Fulham Riverside development. Should definitely reopen once that's completed.
Frans S (2020-04-01 14:16:45+00:00): Thanks for mapping on this project.
Please square the rectangular bulldings with the S key in IDeditor. and do not collect a group of buildings and call it 1 bulding.
Best regards and keep mapping
mueschel (2020-03-28 09:29:33+00:00): Hi,
could you explain this new 'carriageways' tag you used here?
What is its relationship to 'carriageway' and 'lanes'?

Please, spend some time and document these new tags, otherwise the information is useless for every other user.
abakus_uploader (2020-03-27 23:33:55+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Vinber (2020-03-28 09:13:11+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber (2020-03-28 09:13:46+00:00): Oh, nous devons être voisin si vous éditez dans le coin où vous habitez !
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:08:23+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
highflyer74 (2020-03-28 16:03:53+00:00): Hello Bramwyers!

Can you please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7335076830? It's a lonely node with strange tagging on it.

If you have questions, don't hesitate to write!

Thank you!
Bin4ry (2020-03-27 16:53:26+00:00): Sorry if i misedited it, but the supermarket POI is not visible, only the building? Why is that a duplicate?
Bin4ry (2020-03-27 16:57:15+00:00): Just cheked again, query "shop=Supermarket" will not show the Kaufland in the results.
kartonage (2020-03-27 16:58:07+00:00): In this case the whole building has been tagged as supermarket (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28704816). Although it is usually good to have several shops in a building as nodes, in this case Kaufland is the main tenant and the other POIs tend to be located inside Kaufland.
Bin4ry (2020-03-27 17:02:02+00:00): i understand, this explains my problem. i query via the overlay-api and it doesn't show the supermarket in the node results, thus it gets ignored. 
Sorry my fault then.
Bin4ry (2020-03-27 17:04:01+00:00): *overpass obviously
Linkid (2020-03-27 14:14:22+00:00): Source : http://www.labege.fr/2020/03/25/fermeture-du-marche-de-plein-vent/
marczoutendijk (2020-04-20 19:21:49+00:00): DWG: Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83839150
marczoutendijk (2020-04-20 19:51:59+00:00): DWG revert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83840242
highflyer74 (2020-03-28 18:00:55+00:00): Hello!

With addr:placename=* you introduced a completely new tag here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543642600 which is not used anywhere else on the planet. Usually we only use the addr:* namespace for items that actually have an address. 

Also I am trying to figure out the reason for layer=* in the park...

All the best to you!
-------------------------------------------
Tere!

Lisamisega addr:placename=* tutvustasite siin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/543642600 täiesti uue sildi, mida kuskil mujal planeedil ei kasutata. Tavaliselt kasutame addr:* nimeruumi ainult nende üksuste jaoks, millel on tegelikult aadress.

Samuti üritan välja mõelda pargis oleva layer=* põhjuse ...

Kõike paremat sulle!
Sushant852 (2020-03-27 18:05:27+00:00): http://mrsac.maharashtra.gov.in/geoportal/
Maharashtra remote sensing application center is source .
marczoutendijk (2020-04-20 19:22:42+00:00): DWG: Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83839033
Cactooz (2020-03-28 20:30:21+00:00): source -> local knowledge;aerial imagery
marczoutendijk (2020-04-20 19:49:07+00:00): DWG reverted in:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83839987
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-03-28 02:53:43+00:00): I think it's time you better refer to roads by their name that by numbers. I understand "PH-x" is just the same as "Route x" (which I favor), but if there's a locally known road name, use that. I'm all getting tired of you referring national roads with route numbers by their reference than their name (unless not known).
DP24PH (2020-03-29 03:01:48+00:00): I do apologise for the inconvenience that may brought upon by the constant use of route numbers than the names, and I'll switch into PH-/Route n (Local Roadway Name) effective immediately.
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-04-12 04:06:53+00:00): I hope you stick upon that promise again!