piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Herman Lee (2022-06-10 02:31:19+00:00): 您好，access = no 应该是指禁止任何车辆通行，该隧道应该没有这样的限制
user_1566574 (2023-09-22 21:21:07+00:00): Hello !
Concernant https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996835587 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996835592, "note=fixme" étant peu explicite et vu que tous semble à peut près bien, j'ai enlevé l'attribut.
demon_box (2022-03-07 09:46:48+00:00): ciao Ennio, un serbatoio dell'acquedotto quando è mappato con building=service + man_made=reservoir_covered è sufficiente così non serve aggiungere name=Serbatoio acquedotto è una informazione inutile e ridondante, grazie
BCNorwich (2022-02-27 20:20:37+00:00): Hi please consider the comment to your previous changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117865871#map=16/51.7856/-1.5027

You're continuing to add fictional names and duplicated highways.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse (2022-12-02 20:57:18+00:00): Scagglethorpe not Selby Barlow

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1oyl
demon_box (2022-03-06 19:48:02+00:00): ciao Ennio, ho modificato questo tuo changeset così puoi vedere come si mappa correttamente un impianto di ripompaggio dell'acquedotto, grazie
--enrico
Emilius123 (2022-02-27 12:04:39+00:00): Hi. Thank you for your contribution!

Adding this roundabout, you seem to have forgotten something: The roundabout tag. 

On roundabouts, just add the tag "roundabout" with the value "yes".



Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117902634
SomeoneElse (2022-12-02 21:08:35+00:00): Probably Grantley not Grange Lane
user_5359 (2022-02-28 10:47:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Really? You add 31 images on an area without any geo location information? Did you know the key  
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons ? Please have also a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:diet:kosher
chris38 (2022-08-30 09:24:54+00:00): cette voie est goudronnée
Mevess (2022-09-01 19:31:32+00:00): De quel tronçon parlez vous ? Ce groupe de modification est très grand
mosstreet (2022-02-27 16:12:15+00:00): leave the policy of Bandera to yourself 
The map is out of politics https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCSQSxUJb4zH1SEpzNerSLLg  scheme with proven videos
Stop spreading fakes
kakiremora (2022-02-27 21:33:06+00:00): Hello!
For most places in Poland it is recommended to use Geoportal imagery as it is superior in quality and coverage in comparison with alternative sources,
kakiremora (2022-02-27 21:33:33+00:00): Thanks for mapping!
Leo Slager (2022-08-03 22:37:39+00:00): Waarom staat de oostlaan hier al maanden als highway=construction ??
Voor zulke korte perioden NOOIT highway=construction gebruiken.
Zie ook de discussie daarover in het forum !
Leo Slager (2022-08-03 22:43:09+00:00): Het account bestaat niet meer !
habi (2022-12-16 11:05:44+00:00): Tschou Fränä

Isch das e Boum oder ers Museum?
Wenns e Boum isch, de wär `natural=tree` besser!

Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi
user_5359 (2022-02-28 10:16:01+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58154703. What is the meaning of the tag ccname = Colourstream;Uniseal Europe Ltd?
Dave Venables (2022-02-28 11:19:04+00:00): Meant to type old_name
Corrected https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58154703
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-07 21:17:38+00:00): Why the building tag on suburbs?
mrpulley (2025-08-13 11:40:28+00:00): Deleted one attraction at changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170383543 (other previously removed by me at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146850774 (tag removed, empty node incorporated into boundary of wetland)
Emilius123 (2022-02-27 12:12:13+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your contribution.

Just saying, you could've spared the note=, just putting it into the fixme.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117905386
James Derrick (2022-02-27 17:03:09+00:00): Hi Emilius123,
You talked me into it... :-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117915598

PS My survey imagery is now processed if you're curious (several new homes have sub-addresses suggesting the plan changed):
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=656061858932333
Happy mapping,

James
Berlin53 (2023-03-16 17:31:46+00:00): Hallo Alex, du hattest vor längerer Zeit die Grenze von "Teltow" (Weg: 166430010) zum Fixen gekennzeichnet. Die Lage geht wahrscheinlich nicht viel genauer. Allerdings handelt es sich hierbei um ein geologisches Gebilde, nämlich der Teltohochfläche, einer Grundmoräne aus der Eiszeit. Alle Tags in der zugehörigen Relation sind mehr oder weniger frei erfunden und werden deshalb auch nicht ausgewertet. Die Linie verwirrt also nur. Mein Vorschlag: löschen.
StefanHRT (2023-03-17 03:01:44+00:00): Hi Berlin53, Ich bin zwar nicht Alex/Supaplex030 aber richtig, ich hatte das fixme gesetzt da es immer wieder "im Weg" war. Gegen das löschen hätte ich im Prinzip nichts, aber ehrlich gesagt möchte ich das nicht machen. Es gab und gibt genügend Notes wo man mich direkt "anprangert" und auch genügend CS wo mir Willkür und Vandalismus unterstellt wird (Daher auch letztens meine Bemerkung, das ich nichts mehr mache), dies wäre hier im CS zuviel um es genauer zu definieren. Den Hinweis habe ich u.a. auch bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166429999 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166430018 gesetzt. VG Stefan
lasagna (2022-03-10 21:50:40+00:00): This changeset has some problems:

* Unless a surprising change has recently happened, Ocean Front Walk is definitely not a road. Please pay attention to what you are editing.
* Way 641851265 should not be highway=unclassified because it is in a residential area, with residential buildings on both sides.
* Based on your history, I have no reason to believe that way 641851265 is not named Niagara Avenue.

I am now reverting the above aspects of this change and your other change that renamed Niagara Avenue.

The iD editor has "i" (info) buttons next to many of the controls in the "Edit feature" pane. Click on these, read the text that appears, and click the links to the wiki to read more. That is a good way to learn how to map in a helpful way.
Xavier Fabiani (2023-01-16 21:13:48+00:00): Ocean Front is a footpath hence the road-type being Walk.   But there is a well traveled path there
lasagna (2023-01-18 03:44:12+00:00): Thanks for responding. To learn about best practices for names, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name .
I'd like to emphasize that we don't get to make up names just based on what we think sounds good. Names in OpenStreetMap almost always need to be based on signs, official government records, or common usage by locals.
When you add or change a name, please give a source for that name in your changeset description.
lasagna (2022-03-10 21:22:26+00:00): This is the third time (at least) that you have added a ref to these roads. Like every other time, you have not given any sources or explanation to justify this change.

Your change is inconsistent with every other modern-day map that I have seen, and based on my local knowledge it is not supported by any signs or other evidence on the ground.

When you make a contentious change like this, you need to provide a good explanation for why your change is correct and the previous consensus is wrong.

Note: In this case, old_ref is the appropriate tag to label these as roads that were part of an old version of US 101. A historic route relation could also be useful (for example, see how another user has added a relation for historic US 101 further north in San Diego County).

I am now reverting this change and your two related changes.
kaltuna (2023-12-03 13:06:31+00:00): Hallo,
schaust Du bitte mal diesen Hinweis und gibst Rückmeldung, falls möglich ?
Danke Dir
Gruß
kaltuna (2023-12-03 13:07:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4006936
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:56:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 119006707, 119009018, 119042249, 119038499, 119034559, 119013553, 119043587, 119011158, 119036454, 119027452, 119025264, 119040593, 119020576, 119032137, 119022875, 119018164, 119004293, 119015906, 119029638 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:57:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 119006707, 119009018, 119042249, 119038499, 119034559, 119013553, 119043587, 119011158, 119036454, 119027452, 119025264, 119040593, 119020576, 119032137, 119022875, 119018164, 119004293, 119015906, 119029638 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:57:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 119006707, 119009018, 119042249, 119038499, 119034559, 119013553, 119043587, 119011158, 119036454, 119027452, 119025264, 119040593, 119020576, 119032137, 119022875, 119018164, 119004293, 119015906, 119029638 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:57:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 119006707, 119009018, 119042249, 119038499, 119034559, 119013553, 119043587, 119011158, 119036454, 119027452, 119025264, 119040593, 119020576, 119032137, 119022875, 119018164, 119004293, 119015906, 119029638 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:57:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 119006707, 119009018, 119042249, 119038499, 119034559, 119013553, 119043587, 119011158, 119036454, 119027452, 119025264, 119040593, 119020576, 119032137, 119022875, 119018164, 119004293, 119015906, 119029638 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:57:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 119006707, 119009018, 119042249, 119038499, 119034559, 119013553, 119043587, 119011158, 119036454, 119027452, 119025264, 119040593, 119020576, 119032137, 119022875, 119018164, 119004293, 119015906, 119029638 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:57:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 119006707, 119009018, 119042249, 119038499, 119034559, 119013553, 119043587, 119011158, 119036454, 119027452, 119025264, 119040593, 119020576, 119032137, 119022875, 119018164, 119004293, 119015906, 119029638 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:56:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 119006707, 119009018, 119042249, 119038499, 119034559, 119013553, 119043587, 119011158, 119036454, 119027452, 119025264, 119040593, 119020576, 119032137, 119022875, 119018164, 119004293, 119015906, 119029638 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
scotteaton92 (2023-04-06 17:44:56+00:00): Why did you change Hunnewell Avenue to "track" https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/11473004 ? It is clearly a residential road. A surface tag may have been appropriate, but not highway=track
scotteaton92 (2023-04-10 15:30:18+00:00): Any comment?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-03-28 23:57:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 119006707, 119009018, 119042249, 119038499, 119034559, 119013553, 119043587, 119011158, 119036454, 119027452, 119025264, 119040593, 119020576, 119032137, 119022875, 119018164, 119004293, 119015906, 119029638 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for Ticket#2022031510000175 related to undiscussed building import
silversurfer83 (2022-02-28 21:46:19+00:00): Liebe/r Mapper,
Wenn Dinge sich ändern ist es schöner folgendes Taggingschema zu benutzen um die Geschichte des betroffenen Nodes/Ways zu erhalten und ihn später möglicherweise weiter nutzen zu können https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Ist aber nicht so dramatisch, soll nur ein nett gemeinter Hinweis für die Zukunft sein :)
Sam Mumm (2022-05-12 10:08:59+00:00): Hallo,
mit diesem Änderungssatz wurden diverse "Places" angelegt. Ich habe bisher niemanden gefunden, der mit den dort angegebenen Namen etwas anfangen konnte. Es wäre für alle eine Hilfe, wenn Du deine Quelle dort angeben könntest.
osmviborg (2022-02-27 14:58:40+00:00): Og i går var alle beboere flyttet ind. Lad være med at blande dig i noget du ikke ved en skid om.
parsd51 (2022-02-27 15:39:35+00:00): Hvis de ændringer du lavede fremgik tydeligt af dine changesets, med kilde og kommentarer, havde andre mappere en chance for at VIDE hvad du har tænkt - IKKE gætte. Her har jeg GÆTTET at du ikke kunne se maskiner og byggeriet ikke var igang, og slettet tags, som gentagne gange før. Der er heller ingen huse eller veje, som indikerer noget andet. I de her tilfælde sætter jeg removed:construction på så andre kan se ud fra kilde, dato og kommentar hvorfor.

Hvis jeg vidste det samme som dig, havde jeg nok ikke lavet ændringen, og det gør jeg stadig ikke, med mindre du skriver det. Der for er det respektfuldt over for andre mappere at dokumentere kilder gennem kommentarer eller i source feltet.

PS: Prøv at tænke over dine egne ord, næste gang du vil rette - så er der kun survey tilbage.
osmviborg (2022-02-27 15:58:19+00:00): Har du gættet dig til at jeg ikke kunne se at det var en byggeriet var i fuld gang? Du godeste Gud.
osmviborg (2022-02-27 16:12:58+00:00): Området var en byggeplads for næsten et år siden. Tror du tiden står stille i Jylland?
parsd51 (2022-02-27 17:02:21+00:00): Jeg håber du husker de gange du har markeret noget som construction, hvor det ikke var det og tænker over dine egne ord.

Det jeg skrev blev vist igen overset: Dokumenter rettelserne, så vi andre ikke behøver gøre det samme arbejde du har gjort en gang, ellers sker det her igen. 

Ingen af delene er smart, det håber jeg du kan se.
Det viser du en del af med din note, tak for den.
osmviborg (2022-02-28 05:04:14+00:00): "markeret noget som construction, hvor det ikke var det"? Her revertede du et construction område og retaggede det som 'greenfield', trods det at det tydeligvis er en byggeplads. Du argumenterer samtidig for at jeg måske ikke kan tyde et luftfoto. Det er tydeligvis dig der har et problem med at se.
parsd51 (2022-02-28 10:53:00+00:00): Jeg siger bare at områder kan se ud som (pre)-construction, uden faktisk at være det. Når du sletter construction, er det nok noget andet og der er indikationerne at byggearbejdet ikke er påbegyndt eller stoppet.

Du har lavet en note på området. Det er fint, det løser bare ikke det grundlæggende problem med manglende kommentarer og/eller source fremadrettet.
osmviborg (2022-02-28 14:59:08+00:00): Bullshit, der står 'research' som source, og det var det det var.
parsd51 (2022-02-28 16:18:46+00:00): Det er IKKE andres opgave at genopfinde dine kilder, som du skjuler i research for at de kan mappe i OSM!! I den udefinerbare boks research kan ligge alt, lige fra internet, samtaler med moster Oda, til survey afhængig af hvem du spørger. Måske afstår nogen med lokalkendskab fra at mappe på grund af det. Det er spild af energi og hæmmer kvaliteten i OSM. 

Men nu giver jeg op. Jeg mapper når noget ser forkert ud for mig i forhold til de angivne kilder, og så må du komme op med din “research”. Det håber jeg også andre gør, for OSMs skyld.

De fleste mappere i OSM, laver heldigvis super dokumentation af det de laver, også nybegyndere.

Kom nu frem med links eller beskrivelser fundet i din research, så vi sammen kan gøre OSM bedre!
osmviborg (2022-03-01 06:32:24+00:00): 👹
eggie (2022-02-27 13:40:07+00:00): Dag Gerard,


Wat heeft Sellox van doen met een diplomatieke post?

Van welk land is deze ambassade dan? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Ddiplomatic
Je edits  
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=117908025
MVG
eggie
zluuzki (2022-02-27 13:58:21+00:00): wrong account
zluuzki (2022-03-02 10:20:25+00:00): makes sense on this edit
eggie (2022-02-27 13:44:57+00:00): https://www.sellox.nl/

??
Waarom niet gewoon office=company  ?

Je hebt nu een ambassade toegevoegd en ook toegevoegd diplomatic=permanent_mission

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-27 14:05:18+00:00): De ambassadetags heb ik verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-27 14:37:34+00:00): Een bedrijf met de naam Kantoor Sellox is hier niet bekend.
Mvg
Eggie
SekeRob (2022-02-28 10:19:23+00:00): Hi,

You did not close the residential area outlines in 2 places. Fixed in CS 117937718

ciao
voltairovicz (2022-03-02 14:01:33+00:00): Szpital w Hrubieszowie ma bardziej rozwiniętą nazwę, dodałem na nowo obszar + dane kontaktowe
YomanNH (2022-02-28 12:45:56+00:00): Kto i po co wycina te drzewa, skoro uważasz, że nie jest to pierwszy etap budowy drogi? Poza tym dzieje się trochę więcej niż "max. wycinka drzew".
Yunkers (2022-02-28 13:39:41+00:00): Wycinka to nie budowa. Nic nie jest ogrodzone, ruch odbywa się normalnie, nie ma też tabliczek informujących o budowie. W efekcie w terenie nie zauważysz nic oprócz wycinki. Dodatkowo niektóre fragmenty przebiegały przez budynki i ogródki działkowe, a kategorie budowanych dróg były błędne. Więc ogólnie była to jedna wielka maniana, warta wywalenia i zrobienia od nowa.
YomanNH (2022-02-28 14:17:53+00:00): W tym artykule sprzed miesiąca dobrze widać, że dzieje się więcej niż wycinka drzew: https://krakow.naszemiasto.pl/widac-juz-efekty-prac-przy-budowie-trasy-s7-na-terenie/ar/c1-8665071. Będąc na miejscu widziałem tabliczkę z zakazem wjazdu z wyjątkiem pojazdów budowy.
Yunkers (2022-02-28 14:35:35+00:00): Wiem o tym, też tam bywam. To wciąż nie zmienia faktu, że poprzednie oznaczenie było błędne z więcej niż jednego powodu. Dużo lepiej jest póki co oznaczyć tylko teren budowy i systematycznie dodawać kolejne fragmenty, a jeśli bardzo potrzebujesz tej budowanej drogi to zadbać o to, żeby nie przechodziła beznamiętnie przez wszystko po drodze. Popatrz na Północną Obwodnicą, jest droga i jest teren budowy i nie ma problemu. Więc jeśli jesteś w stanie to w miarę dobrze odwzorować to nie widzę problemu, tylko to musi być zrobione jak należy.
YomanNH (2022-02-28 19:20:45+00:00): Aż takiej potrzeby nie mam. Poza tym za chwilę może znowu ktoś usunąłby moją robotę, bo nie wierzyłby, że coś się buduje - szkoda mi czasu na takie zabawy.
charl3s (2022-03-01 17:52:27+00:00): 1. Wycinka drzew to jeden z etapów budowy. 
2. Pojawiają się już wykopy, prace ziemne
charl3s (2022-03-01 17:54:02+00:00): Wg. Mnie highway=construction już na tym etapie powinno być. Takie fragmentowanie tworzy bałagan, mapa wygląda jakby posklejana z kilkunastu miesięcy.
woodpeck (2022-03-04 11:06:26+00:00): Can you explain more about the data source you are using to make these name improvements? You write "with WorldTopoMap" but a quick Internet search did not show a clear candidate for what that might be and what their data license is.
julcnx (2022-03-04 11:42:17+00:00): hi woodpeck. Good point. Data is listed and visible from local government amphoe.com and points to a deprecated public ESRI map. I didn't see any API key requirements, or any restriction in the License section, and I thought since ESRI Imagery is already supported by iD with the World_Imagery service, it would not be an issue, or was I wrong ? 
Imagery page: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=30e5fe3149c34df1ba922e6f5bbf808f
Imagery url: https://{switch:services,server}.arcgisonline.com/arcgis/rest/services/World_Topo_Map/MapServer/tile/{zoom}/{y}/{x}
woodpeck (2022-03-04 12:04:29+00:00): OSM has permission to use certain ESRI aerial imagery sources, but that permission never extended to "everything hosted on arcgis.com" - each map there can have different licensing. The lack of API key is never a sign for an open license! If no license terms are specified then the default is "you cannot use it". You would need to contact the rights owner and obtain explicit permission to use the data in OSM.
julcnx (2022-03-04 12:38:28+00:00): Thanks for the heads up. I will contact asap ESRI and submit a ticket to iD to include a warning to users when using the Custom Layer feature.
4004 (2022-02-27 22:41:47+00:00): но почему не highway=pedestrian?
eggie (2022-02-27 14:48:56+00:00): Beste Gerard
... En hiermee heb je helaas  het gehele adres verwijderd.. 
Bedoel je dat het adres niet meer bestaat?
Vooralsnog heb ik het adres weer hersteld.
Mocht het adres niet meer bestaan laat het dan even weten. 
In het begin worden edits van startende mapper gescreend.. uiteraard om te helpen. 
MVG
eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-04 11:36:04+00:00): Skąd wiesz że pas startowy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035750061 istnieje?
VA00 (2022-07-07 14:46:56+00:00): Obecnie jest tam tylko obsiane zbożem pole, rękaw pokazujący wiatr, resztki tbl. inf. + stolik i 2 krzesła. Miejscowi mówią, że przepisy zabraniają lądowania do 500 m od zabudowań, a powstały nowe domy w okolicy.
abakus_uploader (2022-02-27 23:31:46+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Discostu36 (2024-03-12 13:44:47+00:00): atm=yes;no? Mittelmäßig hilfreiche Information 😁
andwil (2024-03-14 10:09:40+00:00): Hoppla. 😅 Das sollte natürlich atm=yes werden, hab's korrigiert.
opendcc (2022-02-27 15:18:16+00:00): Sorry for large changeset - this was unintentional.
Hans Thompson (2022-02-27 16:49:36+00:00): despite the name, they will help men and have space (a bedroom with bunkbeds) for men.
ivanbranco (2026-05-07 13:06:16+00:00): Ciao Alessandro,

cosa significa barrier=all?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/80840033
alessandrocarmeli (2026-05-08 00:02:07+00:00): Errore mio. Ho dimenticato una w per strada!
Allroads (2022-02-27 23:55:42+00:00): Hoi, het gaat hier niet helemaal goed.

Track, die heen en terug er ingetekend is op de rijbaan.
Er lopen daar ook nog route relaties,  die nu raar lopen.

Path die over een sloot heen liggen.

Zo zie je ook dat de cycleway er strakker ingetekend kan worden.

Hier zie een BGT Omtrekgericht laag, dat wat de overheid intekend. 

Je kan verschillende lagen aan en uit zetten. Zodat je de luchtfoto ziet.

http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/NLOSMOK/OSMOKNL.html#map=21.03/50.7891/5.7576/

Dat heeft nog wel wat werk nodig.
Wim van der Ven (2022-03-02 08:44:52+00:00): Ik heb alleen een verbinding gemaakt van het fietspad naar weg Moerslag anders kan ik niet navigeren naar het pad in het bos. Van al die andere opmerkingen begrijp niet veel. Dat zijn dingen die anderen hebben gemaakt.
Groet Wim.
eggie (2022-03-02 09:13:46+00:00): Wim en Allroads.. Voorlopig heb ik hier de duplicated ways hersteld. 

Gr eggie
eggie (2022-03-02 09:26:06+00:00): .. en de landuse wat hersteld van de voorgaande mapper P.
eggie (2022-03-02 10:20:44+00:00): Fietsroutes hersteld
Allroads (2022-03-02 10:36:10+00:00): Ik zag deze rare hoek in track.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=11791248

Had even beter moeten kijken, dat je die niet had aangeraakt. 

Eggie bedankt.
eggie (2022-03-02 10:43:24+00:00): Wandelroutes verlegd naar fietspad