piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Constable (2017-07-10 10:02:02+00:00): ciao, qua (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4961374189) c'è davvero una cascata?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=waterfall
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-07-10 21:24:59+00:00): vais ter que desculpar pela resposta adiada, as vezes posso ser independente, colocai algumas Informações na imagem que pode ser visto na seguinte hiperligação:

https://i.imgur.com/aoLSHGt.png

por vistas, alguma coisa parece errado com a via 'Rua Simao Masc', acho que tem duas vias sobrepostas por cima da outra
aureozb (2017-07-11 07:59:57+00:00): Mano muito obrigado pela imagem, realmente consigo melhorar cada vez mais as edições, eu fiz diferente, selecionava o nó e aparecia logo um campo ""Restrições de Viragem" e aparecia para selecionar o segmento e setas verdes para permitir e vermelhas para restringir, alêm disso também puz tag restriction e fiz como indicaste. veja também por favor se na R. Simão Masc. já está resolvido.
mavl (2017-07-12 15:12:12+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
mavl (2017-07-12 15:11:57+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
mavl (2017-07-12 15:11:35+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
eggie (2017-07-10 09:20:14+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
eggie (2017-07-10 09:28:41+00:00): Goede actie.thanks . alleen niet helemaal gelukt.
Het fietspad Kiwipad heb ik even aangesloten op de Vrijheidslaan en de busroutes die er overheen lopen heb ik hersteld. Maar de Vrijheidslaan doet het weer. Zo verdwijnen er vaak meer zaken van de kaart. Alertheid blijft nodig.
BHM Martijn (2017-07-10 09:38:51+00:00): Bedankt voor de aanpassingen. In het vervolg zal ik beter letten op de kuisende wegen en of deze nog aansluiten. Ik zag dat de busroutes als relatie aan het object worden gekoppeld. Zal dit in de toekomst in de gaten houden.
mavl (2017-07-12 15:11:15+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
user_5359 (2017-07-10 16:13:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
pfg21 (2017-07-11 08:29:06+00:00): What the fuck are you doing?
mavl (2017-07-11 14:04:37+00:00): Hello javaliuchao. This changeset deletes a lot of data. Probably, it is a mistake. Please, be accurater. This changeset is reverted.
RicoElectrico (2017-07-10 10:52:41+00:00): Cześć, powiedz tylko po co wprowadzać ten sam punkt dwa razy? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4947602921

i

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4961455721

Wydaje mi się, że pierwszy jest dobrze oznaczony.
mavl (2017-07-12 15:09:42+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
mavl (2017-07-12 15:10:24+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
SomeoneElse (2017-07-11 08:55:13+00:00): Hello - can you explain why you have deleted so many things in this and previous changesets?
SomeoneElse (2017-07-11 08:55:31+00:00): 你好 - 你能解释为什么你在这个和以前的变更集中删除了这么多东西？
mavl (2017-07-12 15:09:59+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
hanchao (2017-08-03 13:19:55+00:00): 请尊重其他人的工作成果 不用乱删数据
highflyer74 (2017-07-11 06:36:16+00:00): Hallo nochmal!

Auch hier: Zwischen Hausnummer und Buchstabe gehört kein Leerzeichen. Bitte sei so nett, dies zu korrigieren.
highflyer74 (2017-07-10 10:03:10+00:00): Hallo!

Bitte achte auf die richtige Formatierung bei Hausnummern. Zwischen Zahl und Buchstabe sollte kein Leerzeichen stehen. Eine Frage noch: dieses Gebäude war vorher mit 2a und 2b getaggt. Wo ist denn 2b?

Gruss aus dem Bremer Osten!
nmsl🤣 (2017-08-16 10:38:34+00:00): 苍南大道不属于此关系“中国国家高速公路网 ”
Piskvor (2017-07-10 14:31:29+00:00): Jako sice sídlí, ale takhle by to znamenalo "a Pikrtova 1a je _tady na tom bodě_"; přesunul se Avast, nikoli adresní bod (tj. obě dotčené budovy si zachovaly adresy). Opraveno v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50178135#map=16/50.0481/14.4475
AtomicBohm (2017-07-10 14:47:03+00:00): Uf, ano. Máš pravdu a díky za opravu.
Constable (2017-07-10 09:58:43+00:00): Ciao, vorrei segnalarti due errori causati da questo tuo gruppo di modifiche.
Qua (http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=50171355) puoi vedere cosa hai modificato/aggiunto. Guarda le righe rosse, una é via Gobetti, il cui incrocio con via san Giovanni Bosco risulta spostato di alcune decine di metri rispetto alla realtà.
L'altro problema riguarda via Piave (zona piazza vittorio veneto) che è stata cancellata.
Dai un'occhiata per favore, in modo tale da capire l'errore e non ripeterlo con altre vie.
Prima di salvare le modifiche alla mappa controlla la lista delle modifiche che stai apportando e se vedi cancellazioni che non volevi fare non salvare le modifiche; capita a tutti di cancellare qualcosa senza volerlo, l'importante è accorgersene.
Nel frattempo ci penso io a ripristinare quelle due vie.
Se hai bisogno di chiarimenti chiedi pure.
Grazie
Ciao
zors1843 (2017-07-10 10:16:54+00:00): Kunnen voetgangers/fietsen nog voorbij ?
Sven-04 (2017-07-10 10:41:47+00:00): Ja, nog toegankelijk voor voetgangers en fietsers. Er staan 5 vaste paaltjes over de weg.
zors1843 (2017-07-10 10:44:27+00:00): Dankje.  Zal het nog aanpassen
Øukasz (2017-07-10 16:59:39+00:00): Hi there,

Thanks for doing this. I was actually trying to contact the guy who deleted it asking him to bring it back but i guess you were faster.

Why did you undelete both points? I believe they are duplicates of the same city.

By the way - how did you find out it was deleted? I only realised because I was specifically looking for main cities in Iraq.

It's the capital of a governorate, so I guess it qualifies as a city rather than town...
manoharuss (2017-07-17 05:33:13+00:00): Hi Øukasz,

Sorry for the delayed reply. I did not check my mail for a few days. So for some reason, the deleted city was still there on Mapbox maps. I went through histories of surrounding features in that area and checked them out on OSMCha. I found the changeset by chance by seeing the history of the bus station polygon(if I remember correctly) and thought I should undelete it. 

Here is what I did, 

1. Undeleted this city https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/348117530 

2. I thought this was not a city by looking at wikipedia and changed it to a town https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2487775215

Please do correct if you see a mistake.

Thanks,

Manohar
Øukasz (2017-07-17 09:54:10+00:00): thanks for the response. okay, i will have another look and correct if needed.

on a side note, does mapbox have a dedicated arabic-speaking data team?
manoharuss (2017-07-17 12:30:06+00:00): @Øukasz I am afraid no. But @planemad can read Arabic :p
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-11 16:18:26+00:00): This note is real. Do not delete nodes just because they don't appear elsewhere. OSM quite often has better data.

Source 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuwaykat

Source 2: http://www.geonames.org/search.html?q=Kuweik%C4%81t&country=
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-11 16:19:21+00:00): note > node*
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-11 16:21:16+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50206074
Владимир К (2017-07-10 10:56:15+00:00): дворовые проезды это highway=service+living_street=yes, а не highway=residential
Alexander-II (2018-06-20 11:16:22+00:00): Вы в этой правке удалили name=, добавили кучу name:<lg>, но не добавили name:ru=
Commodoortje (2017-07-10 11:21:45+00:00): Ik zie dat je een residential aangepast hebt naar pedestrian.
Vermoedelijk bedoel je highway=path
met een barrier=bollard aan de Klarendalseweg.
Mocht je hulp nodig hebben laat het me dan weten.
Kijk hier om te zien wat de standaard tagging per wegtype is in Nederland.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
Chrysopras (2017-07-10 10:54:46+00:00): Noch ein Hinweis: die Zufahrtsstraße in das Tal war bisher als hw=track gemappt. Das ist aber, unabhängig von etwaigen access-Beschränkungen, unangemessen, da diese Straße auch als Zufahrt zu den zahlreichen Garten/Wochendenhäusern dient. Daher muss diese Straße mindestens (!) als hw=service getaggt werden, was hier im Changeset geschehen ist.
PT-53 (2022-03-08 07:43:49+00:00): Hallo osm-tron,
für diese Relation:destination_sign
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7385768/history
wird in keep right ein Hinweis "Tippfehler," angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch285=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch320=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=48.29943&lon=9.9088&zoom=19&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C220

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-03-20 12:43:59+00:00): Keine Reaktion. Schade
dist in distance abgeändert
eggie (2017-07-10 12:17:02+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-10 12:25:29+00:00): Het is beter om niet met access=no te beginnen, want dan moet je alle uitzonderingen noemen en dat zijn er meer dan je denkt.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50174384
Er is ook een tag voor destination
eggie (2017-07-10 12:28:31+00:00): motor_vehicle=destination en de rest van de access tags kan er af.
Doe je het zelf?
user_3216889 (2017-07-10 13:54:28+00:00): Oude tags waren prima. Aan één kant van die straat staat een verkeersbord 'verbonden voor motorvoertuigen'; dus die mogen er 'backward' niet in. Voor de rest geen beperkingen.
Het verkeersbord C12 staat zelfs aangegeven op de kaart (in de editor als een punt zichtbaar zichtbaar).
eggie (2017-07-10 16:56:38+00:00): Stel voor de changeset terug te draaien. Graag reactie.
user_3216889 (2017-07-10 17:46:03+00:00): Prima, Eggie.
eggie (2017-07-10 19:37:18+00:00): reverted.. De edit is teruggedraaid naar de oorspronkelijke edit van lokale mapper en na contact met hem.
Freerk, wanneer je vragen hebt kun je gerust reageren
szalona_entropia (2017-07-10 18:04:29+00:00): Nie za wcześnie dwa dni przed faktycznym otwarciem? Ile czasu się routing aktualizuje?
szalona_entropia (2017-07-10 18:06:08+00:00): BTW łącznik do ul. Wylotowej jest w ramach innego kontraktu i jeszcze nie jest gotowy.
Olga | Yanosik (2017-07-11 06:33:10+00:00): Tak mi się właśnie wydawało, że to poza zakresem, zaraz cofnę zmiany na Wylotowej. 
A co do otwarcia to swego czasu ustaliliśmy z zarządem OSM, że takie duże otwarcia możemy robić 2 dni wcześniej, tak, żeby źródła przegenerowały się i żebyśmy zdążyli je pobrać na dzień otwarcia. Nie nadużywamy tej możliwości, takie sytuacje bardzo rzadko występują :)
calfarome (2017-07-10 21:36:07+00:00): Hi FearMydreams, Thank you for your map edits, and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
May I know the reason why did you change ' landuse residential to natural wood?. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/135506262/history
For satellite image this area is purely residential.
eiger (2017-07-10 16:22:11+00:00): Salut, la portion de piste cyclable ajoutée n'existe pas. Quelle est la source de cette modification ?
Mirasolera (2018-03-26 07:43:23+00:00): Es mejor si escribimos el nombre completo, no solo Particip. sino Participación.
Alexander-II (2017-07-11 02:32:43+00:00): Здравствуйте. Тег fenced=*, который вы указали на https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506440911/ устарел и больше не поддерживается. Вместо него следует указывать barrier=fence http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fenced
Alexander-II (2017-07-10 17:01:02+00:00): Вы, видимо, опять воспользовались maps.me, чтобы скорректировать данные. И прежние (неверные наименования) вернулись. Maps.me - не лучший вариант приложения для редактирования чего-то всерьез. К тому же свежие изменения в него попадают лишь с обновлением программы (а заодно и карт) примерно раз в месяц. Вы можете воспользоваться редактором JOSM http://josm.ru/ или iD https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id
xmd5a (2017-07-10 15:06:59+00:00): Хорошо бы еще указать поверхность (surface)
SK53 (2017-07-21 11:19:33+00:00): Hi Kev,

I added a page on the wiki noting at least some of the things we need to track: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Broadmarsh_Re-development. I've just started updating some of the bus route relations from Broadmarsh: it's a big undertaking!

Jerry
kevjs1982 (2017-07-21 17:56:02+00:00): Seen that and updated based on observations and changes I've already done.
SK53 (2017-07-22 13:39:24+00:00): Thanks. BTW this changeset comment very useful. I was wondering why the lights were on when I saw it from the tram.
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-02-06 07:34:20+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1290977 ?
rmikke (2017-07-10 19:43:40+00:00): Przesunąłeś cały las https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506072822 znad jeziora Chrzypsko Wielkie do Wrocławia i tak zostawiłeś...
rowers2 (2017-11-07 15:52:15+00:00): Dzięki za info.
Przecież nie "przesunąłem" i nie zostawiłem.
Nie masz lagów w JOSMie?
Z tego co mi pisali inni też mają.
Jeden z objawów to taki ze podczas lagu gdy przesuwasz ekran to josm potrafi rzucić jednym nodem nawet wiele km czyli poza ekran więc nie widzisz że coś sie zmieniło.

Zdarza się choć rzadziej że jeśli jest zaznaczony jakiś obiekt to josm potrafi rzucić w bok całym obiektem.Najczęściej rzuca w miejsce kliknięcia myszką więc zwykle widać.Dużo ostatnio mapuję więc widzę że dwie ostatnie wersje JOSMa mają bugi jakich wcześniejsze nie miały.Prośba o powiadomienia na priva bo rzadko zaglądam do komentarzy. O widzę że 4 miechy temu napisałeś/
Wróć do stylu traktowania maperów z jakiego kiedyś słynąłeś :-) bo bardzo sie cieszyłem, że dali ci moderacje po czym zastanawiałem się czy ocena Władka Twej osoby nie jest za surowa.
Na razie nie komentuję bo staram się być tolerancyjny z tym że statystyka zdarzeń (wypowiedzi) już mówi że nadmierna tolerancja może spowodować więcej złego niż dobrego.Na usprawiedliwienie powiem że tyle szczucia było że lepiej forum nie zaśmiecać sprzeczkami.Pozdrawiam i liczę na zgodną wspólracę z akcentem na zgodną.
rmikke (2017-11-07 21:35:36+00:00): Jak by Ci to... Owszem, przesunąłeś. W historii obiektu tego nie widać, bo przesunięcie obiektu nie jest widoczne w jego historii, bo obiekt nie zawiera pozycji. Pozycja jest w w punktach składających się na obiekt, więc wystarczy prześledzić historię dowolnego węzła obiektu, np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4958596652/history - widać w niej Twoją edycję i że inni pio Tobie poprawiali. Ja tę historię oglądałem w momencie, kiedy las był pod Wrocławiem i wtedy zawierała tylko utworzenie lasu przez "Cz ja" i Twoje przesunięcie go pod Wrocław. Prawdopodobnie przykleił Ci się do myszy, kiedy robiłes co innego...

A komentarze do swoich zmian czytać należy. Dostajesz za ka żdym razem powiadomienie na maila...
foxox (2017-12-21 18:45:54+00:00): This changeset un-did some fixes I made to the CMU East Campus Garage area a few months ago. New construction last year removed the turnaround circle there and changed the driveways, so the satellite imagery has been out of date.
highflyer74 (2017-07-11 09:31:11+00:00): Hallo Nina und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall hattest Du den Namen des Sonnenstudios entfernt. Gibt es das Sonnenstudio nicht mehr, oder heißt es anders? Melde Dich bitte einmal kurz, damit wir die Dinge in die richtige Richtung leiten können.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB!
aceman444 (2019-02-25 22:20:49+00:00): Hi, why do you think, there is no border control at the border here between Hungary and Slovakia? Also why do you think it is NOT on the main road 17, but there is control on the service roads in between? There is border control, but it does not mean it has to stop every car.
Jay May (2019-02-26 08:09:33+00:00): Hello
This changeset was made over a year ago, just the way I saw it "live".
To answer your question: both Hungary and Slovakia are part of the Schengen area. This means there is no *systematic* border control. If you map a border control on an intra-Schengen border and you use any app with the option "avoid border control" the GPS will lead you through some small road, or another country.
As a similar situation: you have controls on other Schengen borders (LT/PL, LV/LT, LV/EST, PL/SK, F/B ...) but they are not systematic and they stop very few vehicles. Hence, there is no need to map them. However, on extra-Schengen borders (like LT/BY, PL/BY, SK/UA, H/UA, H/RO, etc.) those border control tags should always be added if they are not present.
aceman444 (2019-02-26 08:34:59+00:00): Hi, thanks, I understand that there is the Schengen area and there is no systematic border control. But that may not mean there is none. Also, intra-Schengen controls can be restarted systemically any time the government decides so, e.g. due to terorism or migration (apparently some countries like Germany or Austria do checks right now) .

For the routing problem, if you want to intentionally go into the other country, why would you choose the "avoid border control" option in a GPS routing app? If you really do choose it, then using some small roads is probably the right result:) I'm not sure how such small cross-border roads without border control exist, but they seem to do (in OSM). The "avoid border control (or border crossing)" option may be useful when you actually want to avoid randomly going into different country (e.g. due to motorway toll), when your start and destination point is within the same country. E.g. currently if you want to go from Kosice or Cierna nad Tisou (SK) to Bratislava (SK), you will get routed through motorways (M3, M1) in Hungary, as it is faster due to the incomplete motorways in Slovakia.
Jay May (2019-02-26 10:01:15+00:00): Well, we are supposed to map facts, not eventualities, and the fact is: border controls are not there on a daily basis, which is why mapping them is not relevant. Otherwise, I would have to map all possible border/customs controls within the Schengen area (and not necessarily at the borders themselves but for instance in cities distant 30-50 or 100km from the border). I mapped some border guard controls within the Belarusian or Lithuanian territory, but it is solely because they are systematic. No exception.
For the routing question, I will give you a very simple example I've encountered with a lot of GPS-es: from Vilnius to Warsaw. In order to stay within the Schengen area, you drive through Alytus, Lazdijai, Augustów, Łomża. However, if you put that "border control tag" at the PL/LT border, it will route you through Druskininkai, Hrodna (Belarus) and Białystok because it is the shortest/fastest route in theory. Problem is: to drive through Belarus, you need a visa, and you need to waste a lot of time at the LT/BY border and the BY/PL border. Moreover, it is not allowed to bring a lot of alcohol nor meat through that border. This means that if you want to drive through Belarus and bring some sausage you will encounter some issues, they will ask you to exit the BY territory to get rid of those goods, etc.
Same if you want to drive from Poland to Romania through Ukraine (except for the visa, but you still need a passport and there are some restrictions).
aceman444 (2019-02-26 11:05:32+00:00): So if mapping facts, have you immediatelly added all border controls of Poland at the time in November-December 2018 when they did actually have systematic border checks (due to some international conference)? Also have you added all controls in Germany, Austria, Norway, Denmark etc. since 2015 when they were systematic (or only some of them). If not, then maybe having the warning/or eventuality of a border control in the OSM map on all of them may not be as wrong. Maybe we could put intermittent=yes onto these border_control nodes? Then routing SW could e.g. put less penalty on going through them.

For your, example, I can understand that if you add border_control nodes to PL/LT crossing, then the LT/BY crossing has the same penalty and may actually be a shorter route so you get routed there. But you somehow assume that intra-Schengen border controls aren't real controls, but others are. That is your interpretation that there must be systematic checks, but that is not clearly covered by the currect description of the tag (see OSM wiki). See it mentions to tag places where you "MIGHT be passport checked".
By that rule, I'd be fine if you tagged any common checkpoints even 100 km from the border. E.g. if you go with a car to a a ferry ship in the Mediterraneans, you may be "border controlled" as you will pass into a different country through the sea. So the border_control on the port road may be in order. Also see the discussion to the tag at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:barrier%3Dborder_control, there are some other properties/restrictions that would be useful to map, so how probable a passport check is may be one of them, to somehow distinguish the intra-Schengen borders.
aceman444 (2019-02-26 20:31:42+00:00): Hi, I'm fine with soumehow distinguishing the irregular (rare) checks on borders within Schengen, and systematic checks outside. But it needs to be agreed upon on the Tagging mailing list and be documented on the wiki. Because there are many people adding the controls inside of Schengen, please see this query: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Gu9 .
There are also the border controls on airports and ports to be seen.

So can you post to the Tagging mailinglist to get some ideas? Thanks
wille (2017-07-13 11:48:22+00:00): Ótima edição Rusley!

Em ruas internas de condomínios, você pode usar a tag highway=service.

Temos um grupo no telegram dos mapeadores de Brasília, se quiser participar: https://t.me/osmbsb
Rusleykcruz (2017-07-13 12:24:02+00:00): Tudo bem. 8-)
Hjart (2017-07-12 10:29:12+00:00): Hvor  er kildeangivelsen for de her ændringer på Funder Bygade mm?
4004 (2017-07-27 09:09:58+00:00): центральная вышка? на снимках пусто
eggie (2017-07-11 08:02:38+00:00): Siphoe,  Met treinsporen is iets bijzonders aan de hand op de kaart. (en op kaarten in het algemeen) Ze worden nooit verwijderd... ook als ze niet meer bestaan. Het spoor staat ook als razed getagd en dat was goed.
 Wanneer het spoor ontdaan is van z'n bielzen staat het meestal als dismantled getagd. Het fietspad heeft dan ook de naam van dat spoor. Roseboomspoor.
Wanneer het spoor niet meer gebruikt wordt is de tag disused.
In dezelfde changeset zit ook dat park  dus ik ga er niet aan sleutelen.
Dat razed geeft de historie aan. Ik laat het aan jou over om het te herstellen.
Razed rendert overigens niet. 
Waneer er echt niets meer van de zien is zou ik het zo laten.
siphoe (2017-07-12 15:40:06+00:00): er is inderdaad niks van te zien
nevw (2017-07-11 01:17:11+00:00): I reverted your changeset which unintentionally moved streets, etc.
I then added back to the map The Online Jewellery Company (OJCo).
Can you you check it is all ok now.
chillly (2017-07-10 13:29:40+00:00): H, Welcome to OSM
You seem to have added a cafe, both to the definition of East Sussex and to the route of the SOuth Downs Way. The cafe is a good thing to add, but it's not part of either of the definitions. I'll keep the cafe, but remove it from those relations. 

Please feel free to ask any questions you may have.