piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Hjart (2015-02-24 20:14:29+00:00): Efter min mening har du tilføjet rigeligt med nye noder i Rundkørslen ved Korskro. For det første er det ikke nødvendigt med mere end højst halvt så mange for at få en rimeligt pæn cirkel ved de zoom niveauer vi normalt bruger. For det andet gør flere noder det mere besværligt når et objekt eventuelt skal redigeres igen (og det skal vi regne med det skal før eller senere). For det tredje, hvis vi får for mange af den slags overnodede objekter, skal vi regne med at f.eks. Osmands datafiler bliver meget meget større end de 200 Mb de ligger på nu (for Danmark) og jeg gider altså ikke at skulle til at lægge flere gigabyte store filer på min Garmin heller.
Supaplex (2015-02-22 14:45:19+00:00): 建立單車路徑關係了，讚！
Vintagejhan (2015-02-22 14:46:27+00:00): 因為有實際踏查建立起來比較放心~
EugenyN (2015-02-22 18:33:36+00:00): А я оба тега ставлю...
EugenyN (2015-02-22 18:34:18+00:00): переулок это всегда residential.  (переулок на коминтерновском кладбище)
Otnow (2015-02-22 18:38:46+00:00): При замене тэга руководствовался wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:tunnel,там covered=yes не указан.

Статусы дорог не менял, так было обозначено до меня.
Otnow (2015-02-22 18:48:58+00:00): По возможности поправь недочеты, которые видишь.
EugenyN (2015-02-22 20:03:37+00:00): может быть правильнее не ставить covered=yes. надо подробнее разбираться. почитаю тогда позже.
EugenyN (2015-02-22 20:04:59+00:00): вижу там написано "вместо tunnel=yes и вместе с туннелями, поскольку "covered=yes" автоматически подразумевается для туннелей." что ж. вполне разумно...
gdt (2021-04-02 19:33:57+00:00): I tend to call Roasted Peppers cafe as I do not recall table service.  any objection to retagging it as such?
Ja_Meister! (2015-02-25 16:14:35+00:00): Bitte "Norma" überprüfen. Ich bin mir relativ sicher, dass das ein Netto ist.
maxbe (2015-02-24 09:28:14+00:00): Testkommentar wegen http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=30201
maxbe (2015-02-24 09:31:09+00:00): Und nochn Test
maxbe (2015-02-24 21:39:18+00:00): und noch einer
qmuntane (2015-02-23 19:33:56+00:00): Afegit Escola Anoia.
Nakaner (2015-02-23 22:22:48+00:00): Tipp: In iD (und auch in JOSM) kannst du neben wheelchair:description="Platz ist geschottert" auch noch surface=gravel ergänzten, welches maschinenlesbar ist. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48195454
Nakaner (2015-02-23 22:24:03+00:00): name=Parkplatz ist nicht richtig. Richtig wäre description=Parkplatz, denn "Parkplatz" ist kein Eigenname. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
715371 (2015-02-25 02:55:43+00:00): Ein historic=monument ist soweit ich weiß ein begehbares Denkmal (mit Räumen etc). Dieses Denkmal ist daher wahrscheinlich einfach nur ein historic=memorial.
user_404333 (2015-02-25 15:06:47+00:00): Danke, soeben korrigiert.
zimba (2015-02-23 12:27:43+00:00): An der gleichen stelle war schon ein hotel mit dem gleichen namen eingetragen, das gibts nicht, oder? habe beides (hotel und restaurant) durch ein gebaude mit restaurant-tags an der richtigen stelle (ein paar meter weiter oestlich) ersetzt.
zimba (2015-02-23 12:28:47+00:00): Das Kebabstandl wird wohl nicht mitten auf der strasse stehen, oder? wo steht die bude denn genau?
rakudave (2015-02-22 18:03:19+00:00): Corrected the location of Aldi/Interdiscount and added the Coop Restaurant
robert (2015-02-22 18:20:49+00:00): Hmm. You've managed to turn Sole Farm Avenue into a footpath here and the line you've created between it and Childs Hall Road hasn't been tagged as anything, so OSM doesn't know what it is - it could be a fence, a river, anything. To assign tags to objects you select them and then use the menu on the left hand side to choose what "type" of object it is. You can then add further properties to the object from there.
gorchard (2015-02-22 19:43:17+00:00): I did try to use the object type ... but it just didn't save it.
I apologise If i've made a hash of it - all I wanted to do was add one LINE, mark it as a footpath and get it to link Sole farm Avenue with Childs hall road as a footpath.

Running through the tutorial it all looked easy so I don't know why it went wrong when I tried it for real.
gorchard (2015-02-22 19:53:59+00:00): Right. *hopefully* I've managed to correct this now.  Sole Farm Avenue is back to being a residential Road, and there is now a FOOTPATH linking Sole Farm Avenue to Childs hall Road. 
I hope I've got this right now.
robert (2015-02-22 21:23:15+00:00): Great stuff. Cut-throughs are incredibly useful things to add to OSM. Keep up the good work.
robert (2015-02-22 21:25:02+00:00): (some people get confused by the fact that when you re-click the tag name of an already-tagged object it untags it [so you can select a new tag], which is a bit of a user interface... oddity in my opinion)
gorchard (2015-02-23 11:00:55+00:00): If someone knowledgeable wants to check this I am happy for them to do so.

I know there is a cut-through from Sole Farm Avenue to Childs hall Road - just hope I've added it correctly.
tekim (2015-11-16 04:01:52+00:00): The location of the Sawmill Trail matches neither the Bing Imagery nor the GPS traces that have been uploaded to OSM.  Is this correct?
tekim (2015-11-16 04:03:56+00:00): I just checked it against the Strava Heatmap and it does match it, so it is most likely correct.
KevinSw (2015-11-16 04:53:45+00:00): Thanks for the sanity check.  Sawmill has undergone several reroutes recently, and what's shown here is still correct.  I'm guessing Bing hasn't updated their imagery to reflect the current status...
tekim (2015-11-16 16:20:15+00:00): Kevin, Thanks for your quick reply - and for making OSM one of the most up to date maps there is. Even though I am local, I have not been on that trail in a few years (as evidenced by my comment).
Mr_Brown (2015-11-16 17:06:32+00:00): You can check the new outline from Mapbox using the more zoomed-out imagery. This changeset looks good to me too.
vagabond235 (2015-02-22 18:50:54+00:00): moved Lorenzenspitz to the position south of the Flaggerscharte (according to Kompass map)
Introduced Hörtlahner Spitze according to Kompass map, and the tour description on alpenvereinaktiv.com
tyr_asd (2015-02-22 19:36:15+00:00): Thank you!
PS: For such things you can also use the "South Tyrol Topomap" (published by the provincial administration cartography department and free to use for OSM). It is even available as a background layer in the iD editor. ;)
Otnow (2015-02-22 19:03:53+00:00): ЦТП обозначаю примерно так:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281409302

pipeline=substation

substance=heat

substation=distribution
EugenyN (2015-02-24 09:36:48+00:00): я поищу по "ЦТП". возможно, по ошибке отметил как электро подстанции. а котельные правильно обозначать как power=generator + generator:method=combustion ?
Otnow (2015-02-24 10:27:03+00:00): Уточнил инженерную инфраструктуру где нашел неточности, но можно проглядеть еще, может что пропустил.


Небольшие котельные обозначаю (в небольшом здании):

power=generator

generator:output:hot_water=yes


Крупные котельные (занимающие определенную территорию):

 * для территории:

power=plant

plant:output:hot_water=yes

 * для здания:

power=generator

generator:output:hot_water=yes


Если известен источник энергии (например, газ), то добавляю для зданий:

generator:method=combustion

generator:source=gas
EugenyN (2015-02-24 10:57:05+00:00): ок. спасибо. буду разбираться.
chnav (2015-02-23 13:00:25+00:00): Не надо было удалять полигон больницы и рисовать новый, надо исправлять.
Вообще примите за правило ничего не удалять пока не появится опыт.
Polarbear (2015-03-02 15:28:05+00:00): Bitte traffic_lights auf die Strasse stellen, nicht daneben, damit sie von Routern beruecksichtigt werden koennen.
Rogehm (2015-02-24 04:36:50+00:00): Neueröffnung Feb 2015
Harry Wood (2015-03-04 13:58:40+00:00): Oopsie. Looks like Whittington Park got broken here. I've just fixed it.
SomeoneElse (2015-02-26 14:46:13+00:00): When I walked past it recently I couldn't see the name "Art Deco/Modernist style house" anywhere.  Are you sure that it is really called that?
Quentin Wallace (2015-02-26 16:50:29+00:00): Hi, there is no nameplate or sign but the building is known in Matlock as being the only local example in that style of architecture. So there is no "official" recognition, but it is of local interest.
Quentin Wallace (2015-02-26 20:19:24+00:00): OK. I have removed the name and added the building:architecture tag.
MichalP (2016-03-17 11:25:07+00:00): ahoj, prečo si duplikoval existujúci cyklochodník, ktorý bol naznačený o meter vedľa? dosť si domrvil okolie, pokazil križovania, aťd. bol na to nejaký dôvod?
mapko (2016-03-17 15:19:36+00:00): ahoj, kde presne nakoľko neviem čo myslíš?
MichalP (2016-04-15 09:51:52+00:00): no v tom changesete v ktorom komentujem (viedenska). naco si pridaval ten chodnik duplicitne?
mapko (2016-04-15 10:27:39+00:00): changeset je dosť veľký, neviem ktorý chodník myslíš. inak žiadny doplicitný chodník som nepridával... keď tak to mohol spôsobiť iD. ak ma navedieš tak to opravím.
MichalP (2016-04-15 12:01:53+00:00): je to maly changeset (aj s popisom "cyklotrasa"), ktoru si pridal duplititne popri uz existujucej. preco?
mapko (2016-04-16 22:51:41+00:00): uveď číslo cesty nech aj ja viem na čo sa pýtaš
MichalP (2016-04-18 12:04:43+00:00): v tomto changesete si pridal dve (slovom dve) cesty. obidve duplicitne. prečo? plus jednu si zmazal (načo, resp prečo si ju mazal keď si ju hneď nakreslil ešte raz, ale bez cyklotrás???)
mapko (2016-04-18 20:21:00+00:00): začínam chápať. 
1. tie dve cesty som nepridal
2. a tú jednu nezmazal
nevybavujem si ani delenie jeden cesty na dve. netuším o čo ide, ani mi to nedáva zmysel aby som také niečo robil.
ak vieš vrátiť zmeny späť, tak to pls. urob.
MichalP (2016-04-19 11:02:37+00:00): no práveže pridal a zmazal. a pridal duplicitne a zmazal z cyklotrás (kuk o pár pixelov nižšie). 

nebuď ako slon v porceláne že mažeš veci okolo a ani si to neuvedomuješ. túto mapu aj niekto používa a túto oblasť si dosť pokazil.

opravíš po sebe?
Bernard59118 (2015-03-03 19:05:01+00:00): Bonjour,
Y a t'il effectivement un chateau d'eau à cet endroit?
Pa sur BING !!!
il existe 2 ponts à ne pas déplacer à proximité.
Par ailleurs, sauf particularité on ne donne pas de nom à un château d'eau mais il faut lui donner  l'attribut 
man_made=water_tower
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:man_made%3Dwater_tower
Bonne cartographie
Bernard
Harald Hartmann (2016-03-26 12:32:17+00:00): Hallo cucu, zu dieser Änderung gibt es einen Hinweis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/444937) vielleicht magst du dir das mal anschauen und den Hinweis bearbeiten ;)
Markus366 (2015-03-01 18:29:03+00:00): Hallo,

kannst du erklären, was mit deinem Eintrag gemeint ist? Meiner Beobachtung nach konnte ich bislang nur Ackerflächen an dieser Stelle erkennen.

Gruß Markus
Marius_A (2015-02-23 06:46:01+00:00): added name "Parc de la Brouette"
Nakaner (2015-04-14 16:28:58+00:00): Du hast in diesem Changeset ein oder mehrere Hp-Lichtsignale im westlichen Teil des Bahnhofs Opladen eingetragen. Vom östenlichen Bahnhofsteil weiß ich, dass dort Ks-Signale stehen (ich bin am 29.3.2015 dort durchgefahren). Ist deine "survey" schon etwas länger her oder ist das ESTW erst vor ein paar Wochen in Betrieb gegangen?

Übrigens, auch während einer Umleitung (war aber ein ICE) habe ich die Strecke Opladen–Immigraht–Düsseldorf Hbf filmebn können. Ausgewertet habe ich das Video noch nicht. :-)
ohligser (2015-04-14 19:28:13+00:00): Hi Nakaner,
meine Hand würde ich dafür nicht ins Feuer legen, dafür war ich zu selten an der Güterbahn. Soweit mir möglich, achte ich auf "hp" oder "ks" - musste ich aber auch erst mal lernen. Sollte ich es besser wissen, ändere ich es auch wieder. Auf jeden Fall wechselt die alte und neue Signalisierung irgendwo zwischen Op und Mülheim. Wenn Du die Stellwerksgrenze kennst oder mit Bildern helfen kannst, korrigiere ich gerne. Ansonsten wird es noch einen Moment dauern, bis ich mit dem Fahrrad mal dort war.
Die Strecke durch den Ostteil Opladens (etwa Mülheim-A3 bis Gruiten) ist auf neue Signale umgestellt, fahre ich täglich.
Gruß, Christian
Marius_A (2015-02-23 06:48:59+00:00): added name Square d'Echallens
robert (2015-02-23 18:44:43+00:00): The Grove -> Fieldhurst Close: are you sure about this? 3 things...
1. OS Locator disagrees with you http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=742886
2. Fieldhurst Close is the road one down from this one.
3. The road you've assigned the name to is not a close.
jpennycook (2015-02-23 20:37:29+00:00): Fixed in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29053634 and replied to Robert
Marius_A (2015-02-23 06:49:43+00:00): added "café" L'Atelier
Marius_A (2015-02-23 06:50:44+00:00): modified acces to square steps + footpath
Marius_A (2015-02-23 06:51:11+00:00): added table tennis table
Marius_A (2015-02-23 06:51:21+00:00): added table tennis table
Marius_A (2015-02-23 06:51:28+00:00): added table tennis table
Mars-Curaçao (2015-06-11 06:48:30+00:00): Er is geen doorgaande weg vanuit Zuurzak naar Bottelier, de weg is afgesloten met een groot hek! .. Dat had ik al eens veranderd, kan ik het gvd weeeer aanpassen!  Wanneer je de situatie ter plaatse niet zelf hebt gezien blijf er dan lekker vanaf!!!!
Marius_A (2015-02-23 06:46:50+00:00): added post box
Nick Twigg (2015-02-23 00:03:17+00:00): Added stop sign at Beaufort Gardens at junciton With Brackenbrae Road
SomeoneElse (2015-02-27 12:56:13+00:00): Hi - was this import discussed anywhere reasonably public (see http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines for details) before it started (and no, a wiki page or something specific to OpenRailwayMap does not count as "reasonably public").  It seems to have come as a surprise to the Dutch OSM community - http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=488405#p488405 .
JJJWegdam (2015-02-27 14:56:18+00:00): Good afternoon,

first of all, a notion about the background of this import: a week ago I received permission from ProRail to import their data from the Railmaps application into OpenStreetmap. This application contains quite a large variety of rail infra data (literally all exact locations of tracks in the Netherlands for example). Milestones is one of the data-subsets.

To answer your question: I did not discuss this import anywhere resonably public as you describe it. This because I have access to much (in my opinion) valuable data for OSM, while my study leaves me with limited mapping time. I recognized my lack of contact with Dutch mappers outside my hometown and when considering the limited time I thought that starting with this ideally simple dataset couldn't do any permanent harm: it is one clear dataset, that does not intervene with any other data and consists purely of tagged nodes. My intention was to provoke a reaction from relevant active contributors, in order to start discussing my plans with them.

I'm glad that you guys contacted me. I'll be here and at communities which I'm directed to (like the above) to answer all questions that may arise as soon as possible. I hope that my approach didn't offend any of you.

Kind regards
trickXVII (2015-02-23 10:19:29+00:00): Alles klar, Hauptsache es ist eingetragen!  ;)
keithonearth (2015-02-27 19:40:44+00:00): I'm not convinced that the Riley Park site should be tagged as a constructing site.  There is no active construction going on there now, and the area tagged as such includes one completed building that has been completed, and is occupied.
Spacecookies (2015-03-01 08:30:41+00:00): That's fair enough. I figured it was under construction after I read the city's plan for the site (http://vancouver.ca/docs/planning/little-mountain-policy-statement.pdf), and saw the whole area was fenced off and looked sort of like a construction site when I biked past it last weekend. If they're not currently building anything though then I suppose it's not really under construction. Amend as you see fit.
Vincent de Phily (2015-02-23 14:47:17+00:00): Nice surveying job, but there are a few issues :

* The golf tags are duplicated on all the nodes, when they should only be on the ways. Search (ctrl+f) for "type:node golf=*" in josm to select and cleanup the nodes.
* A few fairways are mapped in duplicates. Choose one.
* There are pointlessly too many nodes. Surveying with high accuracy is great, but adding intermediate nodes on a straight section is just a waste of ressources. Use "tools -> simplify way" in josm (tweak its threshold in the preferences).
Rovastar (2015-02-23 15:05:59+00:00): The node issues and dups I have fixed already. A simple fix when you know how.

There are not too many nodes - this is great. Don't listen to the haters,
Please leave as it is.
Don't use Simplify ways in Josm. Simplify way is simply useless. It will reduce all your work and ways to a  complete mess.
Ragi Yaser Burhum (2015-02-23 15:24:58+00:00): Than you Vincent and Rovastar for fixing andpointing out how to improve the data! I really appreciate the help from both of you. 

To make this easy in the future, I can also setup different thresholds in the mobile device or server as far as how often I want a vertex. Should I drop down to every 3 meters instead? or more than that?

I wrote a blog post about collecting this data that can be found here: 
https://blog.amigocloud.com/sub-meter-data-collection-with-an-iphone-into-openstreetmap/

I would appreciate any feedback.
Vincent de Phily (2015-02-23 15:48:48+00:00): Collecting many points during your initial survey is great, no need to change that. But (IMHO) apply some restraint when uploading to osm. 

Josm's simplify way tool *can* be used, but you really need to lower its threshold otherwise (as Rovastar pointed out) it'll remove too much detail. edit -> preferences -> advanced ->search for "simplify" and lower it to 0.3 or less (experiment to find a value you're comfortable with).
Rovastar (2015-02-23 16:42:10+00:00): I don't see any need to change what you are doing. I don't see any point making entering data more difficult for yourself.
Some don't enter detailed data and don't see the need. 
Simplifying tools will *always* lose information.
Openstreetmap has a large database all your edits in this set only contributed 0.000005% of the total and about 0.005% of new nodes added daily. It is not going to effect OSM at all in any negative way adding detailed info.
Pieren (2015-02-24 09:11:56+00:00): > 0.000005%
This is not the question. Ways are simplified everywhere in OSM. I don't understand why it should different here.
Hjart (2015-02-24 22:48:04+00:00): I have *many* times seen the accuracy of ways *increase* just by deleting nodes either manually or by using one of the simplifying tools. Please note that there's a "simplifyarea" plugin (which I often use).
Ragi Yaser Burhum (2015-02-24 22:59:46+00:00): I think what I will do in all future uploads is to run (1) ST_SimplifyPreserveTopology in the server before exporting and use a 1m tolerance and (2) drop all vertices where the accuracy is not at least 5m. That would reduce several vertices.
muralito (2015-02-23 11:18:25+00:00): Creo que las sedes de scouts debieran ser "office=association". El "camp_site" es para los sitios donde efectivamente se acampa.
SomeoneElse (2015-03-09 14:11:21+00:00): Not sure what happened here - needs a survey.  See http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/328671 .
surveyor54 (2015-02-23 14:23:08+00:00): highway=platform ist veraltet, siehe hier:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=platform?uselang=de

Die Haltestellen waren also in Ordnung
TetiSoft (2015-03-18 21:34:22+00:00): In Ordnung ja, aber unsichtbar...
Mapnik zeigt sie nur mit highway=platform
(oder railway=platform), ein public_transport=platform alleine reicht ihm nicht...
Nakaner (2015-03-20 19:33:08+00:00): Da highway=platform aber nicht mit anderen Tags in Konflikt steht (d.h. es gibt kein anderes, passendes highway=*), gibt es keinen Grund das Tag zu löschen, auch wenn es "veraltet" ist.
surveyor54 (2015-03-20 21:33:32+00:00): Ich habe hier nichts gelöscht. 
Ich habe mich nur gewundert, dass dieser tag nachträglich hinzugefügt wurde, nur um die platform sichtbar zu machen.
jremillard (2015-02-23 12:28:54+00:00): Please following the import process. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
The EPA sites are not tagged correctly, I would suggest removing this data.
emacsen (2015-02-23 12:40:45+00:00): As jremillard said, all import must be vetted by the community according to the import process. I'm reverting this import now.
Basstoelpel (2020-09-23 09:44:59+00:00): A site containg a number of buildings should not be tagged as building itself.
soodabe (2015-02-23 08:26:38+00:00): I am shopping i this supermarket every week.this was opened last year.
scai (2015-02-23 17:54:23+00:00): Hallo Lulau. Schön, dass du so viel zu OSM beiträgst! Habe jedoch eine kleine Anmerkung: Bei unbenannten Objekten wie beispielsweise dem Friedhof in Königsee bitte keine eigenen Namen erfinden. Als Name sollten nur offizielle Namen eingetragen werden, "Friedhof" als Name zu setzen wird in OSM üblicherweise nicht gemacht. Dafür gibt es die Tags, die du ja korrekt gesetzt hast. Ansonsten sieht alles super aus, weiter so :)
scai (2015-02-24 19:24:33+00:00): Schade, dass du mir nicht antworten möchtest. Jedenfalls habe ich ein paar deiner Änderungen korrigiert und falsche Namen an Friedhöfen und Spielplätzen entfernt: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29075385
RicoElectrico (2015-10-08 18:47:56+00:00): Możesz powiedzieć w którym miejscu znajduje się serwis rowerów? Tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2473466870 czy tutaj? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2473472171/ (wcześniejsza Twoja edycja) 
Poza tym lepiej byłoby to oznaczyć jako shop=bicycle (patrz http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbicycle ) bo sama nazwa dodana do adresu niezbyt będzie dostępna do wyszukania w programach (np. gdyby ktoś chciał żeby nawigacja mu pokazała serwisy rowerowe w okolicy)
gormo (2015-02-23 11:20:11+00:00): Hallo, Du hast das amenity=recycling-Tag von dem Knoten weggenommen. War das Absicht?
Hjart (2015-02-23 10:11:56+00:00): Hej jeg kiggede lige lidt på hvad du lavede og kunne se en række fejl, som jeg har rettet. Bare lige så du er opmærksom på det. 

Tak for bidraget til vores projekt.
mikkeltj (2015-02-24 07:16:03+00:00): jamen jeg takker mange gange og self vil jeg bidrage til et godt projekt :D
SomeoneElse (2015-02-24 02:10:53+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
I notice that you've added the name "Bronte Way" to a piece of footpath at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259219442 .  I'm guesing that this isn't actually the name of an individual piece of path but actually part of the long distance route (currenly only a bit of which is mapped) http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1537369 .  Mapping long distance routes as relations make sense when (as in this case) a footpath or road as a name ("Ponden Lane") but is also part of one or more longer long distance routes.  You can see them all (including the bit of Bronte Way that's mapped already) here:
http://waymarkedtrails.org/en/?zoom=14&lat=53.83118&lon=-2.01704&hill=0#
Anyway, hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help.  Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
barb-andmike (2015-02-25 20:05:56+00:00): You are correct,  I know the path is part of The Bronte Way but do not know if it has another name or not.  I was simply carrying on from the adjoining path.  And no I don't mind you mentioning it.  is any further action needed?
SomeoneElse (2015-02-27 00:30:07+00:00): I'd definitely add it to the "Bronte Way" relation so it's included in http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1537369 and also appears as part of the "BW" on the waymarkedtrails.org link.

To add it edit the area around http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/259219442 , move the map so that you can see Ponden Reservoir to the southeast (where the other bit of Bronte Way is), then move the map back, click on your bit of Bronte Way, click "advanced" then "add to" (at the bottom left), and then select "Bronte Way" (on the second page) and then select.  It should gain a green part around it showing it's part of the long distance footpath.