piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-09-28 18:41:55+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-09-28 18:49:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2018-09-28 18:50:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
hadw (2018-10-06 10:53:43+00:00): Thanks for trying to enter service times, but there is a special syntax for this tag that allows the times to be machine parsed.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours

Also, there is a distinction between service and opening times.  When the building is locked should be reflected in opening times, not service times.  This uses the same basic syntax.

Also, it is unlikely that it is possible to plot an accurate outline of the building just from local knowledge, so the original Bing source should be retained.  You can separate multiple sources using ";".

A couple of things to note are that most of what the general public call mosques, in the UK, actually use Masjid in their official name.  Are you sure this is signed as Mosque, not Masjid?  Also, most also have the name in Arabic, so, if you are able to transcribe Arabic, it would be useful to add a name:ar tag.  If the building is only signed in Arabic, that should be used for the primary name tag.
eteb3 (2018-10-07 11:20:22+00:00): Thanks for all that feedback; very useful.
On opening times, it looks from the link you sent that it would be impossible to adhere to the syntax and also capture the sun-variable opening times - do you think? The mosque is open at dawn prayers, but that can be anything from around 0345 to 0745 depending on the time of year; and final close at evening is similarly variable. I'll remove the opening times for the time being - but these are often very important to a practising Muslim when travelling to a mosque to pray - it might not be worth the journey if it's locked. (Maybe we can have sun-variable time tags?)
I hadn't realised I'd deleted the Bing tag - I assumed that was the source just for the change I was making at that point. I'll put that back (and will have to do so for just about every change I've made in the last 2 weeks! Can I find a list of these somewhere?!)
I've found the same as you re mosque names; also that their names slowly mutate through the years, and at any one time aren't even always consistent from one piece of literature to another. On their website this mosque calls itself FeM *Mosque* - that seems to have been a relatively recent change, I think.
I can transcribe Arabic, but these folk don't use it: in fact there's no sign outside at all. Salah ad-Din Mosque at the bottom of Cromwell Rd does, I think, so once I've checked that that is the case I'll add.
Thank you for your review - very helpful indeed. There are plenty of other changes I've been making elsewhere, and I hope not disastrously. Should possibly slow down and let others tutor me...
hadw (2018-10-07 13:02:34+00:00): There is a fall-back mechanism for opening/service hours, where you can use free text in quotation marks.  The disadvantage is that automated tools cannot determine whether or not the building is open.

The full specification includes dawn, dusk, sunrise and sunset, although doesn't rigorously define them.  They also allow you to specify offsets from those times.

If the religious rules are more complex than can be fitted into that model, but are consistent throughout the world, it might be worth proposing additional special values for time of day.  I'm not sure where you would propose them, but you could see if anyone on the Questions forum could give you a pointer.  Normally one would just start using a value, but opening times already has the double quotes mechanism and the tools that evaluate the times would not want to have to cope with lots of new values being created in the field.

I think it is also generally weak, at the moment on lunar calendar festivals; it only knows about Easter.
Hjart (2018-09-28 19:23:35+00:00): Bemærk at det kan være værd at støtte sig til SDFE Skærmkort når man modellerer bygninger.
NKA (2018-10-03 09:52:27+00:00): You deleted a large forest. Please do not do so without replacing it with anything.

What is your plan here?
NKA (2018-10-08 11:22:29+00:00): No reply. Reverted.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-15 16:15:16+00:00): Noticed in DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
jgon6 (2018-09-28 20:37:17+00:00): The description tag that you provided reads like an advertisement. Advertising does not belong on the map. You also didn't add any tags that describe what the point is. I'm going to guess that this is the office for the towing company, so it should be tagged as an office. Also, the phone number should be formated as  1-260-225-1017
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63019208
gabro00 (2018-09-29 12:17:53+00:00): Ha erre jártál, az útfelületeket hozzá tudod adni az ELI környékén? Műholdképen nem minden egyértelmű.
GBAB (2018-10-10 08:55:15+00:00): Kedves Gabro00!
A kutatók éjszakáján jártam kint, s ami épp kézre esett, azt fölrajzoltam. Elég sok szép díszburkolat van, de a részletekre nem nagyon emlékszem (és sajna mostanában nincs kapacitásom kibiciklizni).
Légy jó!
Gábor
gabro00 (2018-10-10 08:56:47+00:00): Rendben, köszi a választ :)
diskmanti (2018-10-03 10:16:35+00:00): cfare eshte kjo pika se knie shenuar vetme emrin
trial (2026-03-28 17:51:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/626495068#map=19/48.097459/-1.624780&layers=N devrait être au sud de la voie et non dessus.
viloan (2018-09-28 19:57:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
lakedistrict (2018-09-29 16:43:25+00:00): I only just "fixed" the tagging on this a few weeks ago. Is it really a tower? I'd probably describe it as a mast, based on the wiki descriptions. :)
GinaroZ (2018-09-30 21:26:44+00:00): The wiki isn't very clear on the whole mast v tower situation. From the mb21 images it looks like a self-supporting structure or lattice tower, a smaller version of towers like Crystal Palace?
lakedistrict (2018-10-01 21:59:37+00:00): I read somewhere that towers had platforms and staircases whilst masts only had ladders. However there's a lot of crossover between the two tags so either tag is probably suitable for this transmitter.
eggie (2018-10-13 10:38:36+00:00): Hoi  lyctkel,

Hoe lang is de Sportlaan hier dicht? Als het maar voor een paar weken is zou het beter niet op construction kunnen staan. Er zal toch wel een omleiding zijn aangegeven?
MVG,
Eggie
lyctkel (2018-10-13 12:36:57+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
de werzaamheden duren tot April 2019.
Omdat ik de planen voor den rotunden en de straten niet ken heb ik de oude straten de status construction gegeven. Zo blijven de relations bestaan tot de nieuwe straaten klaar zijn.
Meer informatie staat hier:
https://www.denhaag.nl/nl/in-de-stad/verkeer-en-vervoer/werkzaamheden-route-kijkduin-houtrust.htm
Dit staat in den noten https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1542375 en https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1542379, maar in de changeset is er geen referntie naar deze)
Omleidingen zijn er zeker, maar ik heb deze niet genoteerd. Omdat ik niet in de buurt woon ben ik er ook niet zo vaak om dat nu te mapen.
MVG,
lyctkel
eggie (2018-10-13 12:52:13+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk.. ja dat is wel een behoorlijke tijd.. bedankt voor je reactie.. groet .. eggie
Aleks-Berlin (2018-09-29 12:08:13+00:00): Hi houtari, please follow the OSM wiki (wikipedia=lang:Article, not =http..), see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
Also adding wikidata is recommended.
Thanks, Alex
jgon6 (2018-09-28 20:43:23+00:00): I actually meant that the building should keep the tag of building=retail. I had to double check, but the shop=mall tag should really go as well. The shop=mall tag is more for a  proper mall, like Glenbrook, or Jefferson Pointe.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63022271
Digne (2018-09-30 09:11:03+00:00): Hallo jb54osm,

Ik zag dat er om feedback was gevraagd. Het lijkt mij allemaal in orde.
osmviborg (2018-10-01 06:28:54+00:00): Café Skagen, 701297, eksisterer ikke mere, lukkede sidste efterår. "Vinos Y Pintxos" hedder stedet nu.
viloan (2018-09-28 20:42:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eteb3 (2024-07-21 17:56:33+00:00): Hi, I wondered what your source for the peak name is here? I know it's called Brunt Hill on the OS maps (and has been since 1900s), but local usage seems to be to call it just The Brunt. But I'm not 100% sure. Thanks.
Pawcio (2024-07-21 21:09:18+00:00): Hi, I think the source was OS map.
eteb3 (2024-07-21 21:23:47+00:00): Thanks. I’ll ask a bit more locally
Digne (2018-09-30 09:26:45+00:00): Hallo TheRaptor-NL,

Ik zag dat er om feedback was gevraagd. Ik zou 96a dan toch maar toevoegen als adres. Of de BAG zit er naast, of het is feitelijk gewoon één adres. Maar dan zou ik gewoon uitgaan van hoe de situatie in de werkelijkheid is.
chachafish (2018-10-08 14:21:57+00:00): Howdy :) On West Colfax Avenue, west of Sheridan Boulevard, you've created roads on top of roads for both eastbound and westbound traffic lanes. Could you go back and correct this? If you have any questions, please let me know. Thanks :)
UncoolGuyJake (2018-10-08 17:58:39+00:00): Thank you for pointing this out to me! I believe I have corrected the issue, but if you see anything like this in the future please let me know!
vespax (2019-01-17 20:05:24+00:00): spuddy93, would you look at this area and ensure that no data for the surrounding businesses were improperly deleted?  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63023556#map=18/39.67557/-104.87169

You can ask Your Village Maps about any data that should have remained.  Thanks.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Your%20Village%20Maps
spuddy93 (2019-01-28 16:00:12+00:00): As far as I can see, JOSM shows I only modified roads in this area. What business are we looking for in particular?
frosm (2018-09-29 14:41:11+00:00): bonjour et bienvenu sur openstreetmap
merci pour la maj.
bonne continuation
woodpeck (2018-09-29 13:06:11+00:00): In what way does this changeset which removes a single node that I never touched "repair vandalism" as you claim in the changeset comment?
literan (2018-09-29 10:40:28+00:00): добрый день. вы ставите на дорожки и ворота взаимоисключающие теги: access=no значит что по ним физически никому нельзя ходить и ездить вообще, и тут же ставите тег, что на велосипедах и пешком можно ходить всем. Вычищу все это пока.
maraf24 (2018-10-03 17:28:03+00:00): 30km/h? Pojawił się już znak strefy 30?
zzz_Britva_zzz (2018-10-03 19:35:54+00:00): Sprawdzę. Ale na Mapillary jest: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.09789705656567&lng=17.033034845454495&z=17&pKey=HenLsLqttSbd9xgExVfhYQ&focus=photo
maraf24 (2018-10-03 19:39:07+00:00): Potem ten znak zniknął. Ale pozostał znak końca strefy przy skrzyżowaniu z Piłsudskiego. Stąd moje pytanie, czy uzupełnili oznakowanie.
zzz_Britva_zzz (2018-10-03 20:05:25+00:00): Nie wiem
zzz_Britva_zzz (2018-10-03 20:51:43+00:00): Przywrócono maxspeed=50
Hjart (2018-09-29 21:28:42+00:00): What updated imagery? Are you sure the Digital Globe imagery here is actually younger than the 2017 SDFE imagery?
atcomapper (2018-09-30 13:42:55+00:00): Hjart: according to the source tag provided on the changeset the imagery used is dated 1 August 2018
Hjart (2018-10-01 13:13:41+00:00): How does he know the imagery here was actually captured on that date? I don't see any "Capture Date" metadata on the DG tiles.
berms (2018-10-01 23:18:02+00:00): Hi, yes, the image I used was from Digital Globe from August 1, 2018.
maraf24 (2018-10-03 17:30:17+00:00): none|2|none, tam jest pas rowerowy
kartonage (2018-09-29 03:22:22+00:00): Hi,
please don't remove the natural=tree tagging of the tree. It's correctly tagged as a tree. "Naturdenkmal Ginkgobaum" is a description of what it is. The name is only ever the actual name. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only) It's irrelevant if people meet up there as that won't change neither the tagging nor the name of the tree. A tree usualy also has no address since I can't write a letter there. For questions regarding the tagging of Naturdenkmäler please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Naturdenkmäler for further information. Thanks.
Mackie Mapper (2018-09-29 09:05:05+00:00): HI kartonage,

zunächst entschuldige bitte, dass ich auf Deinen letzten Review-Kommentar bei der Erstellung des Kartenpunktes nicht geantwortet hatte, ich hatte es schlicht vergessen.
Zum akt. Problem verstehe ich einige Dinge nicht: Mein ursprüngliches Anliegen, warum ich das "Naturdenkmal Ginkgobaum" angelegt hatte, war, dass mir dieser einmal als Treffpunkt genannt wurde, ich ihn aber später weder bei Google Maps noch bei OSM finden konnte.
1. Gebe ich "Naturdenkmal Ginkgobaum Berlin" in die Suche ein wird rein gar nichts angezeigt.
Da ich nun weiß, dass der Baum da sein muss, gebe ich "HU Berlin" ein und bekomme wieder nichts (Google Maps liefert zumindest 2 Treffer), tippe also, dies nur als Zwischenbemerkung, das elendig lange "Humboldt Universität Berlin" ein, worauf mir dann, obgleich ich jetzt zumindest auf dem Gebiet des HU-Hauptgebäudes bin, die "Coffeebar HU" angezeigt wird (aber gut, das wäre eine andere "Baustelle", die mir nur in diesem Zusammenhang auffiel).
2. Da ich weiß, wo der Baum sein muss, sehe ich nun den "grünen Punkt", erhalte aber bei Firefox 60.2.1esr keinerlei sichtbare Information auf der Karte, um was es sich bei diesem Punkt handelt.

Meine Erwartungshaltung an OSM wäre, dass 
1. ich nach Eingabe von "Naturdenkmal Ginkgobaum Berlin" genau auf diesem lande.
2. unter dem PUnkt zum "Naturdenkmal Ginkgobaum" sollte die Bezeichnung  "Naturdenkmal Ginkgobaum" auch auftauchen, genau wie direkt daneben nicht nur "Messer und Gabel" als Symbol für ein Restaurant angezeigt wird, sondern darunter auch mit "Mensa Süd" genauer beschrieben wird, um welches es sich handelt.

Gibt es Möglichkeiten, das so umzusetzen oder will/kann OSM diese Erwartungshaltung aus mir noch unbekannten Gründen schlicht nicht bedienen?
Mackie Mapper (2018-09-29 09:08:57+00:00): PS: Ich verstehe, was mit "A tree usualy also has no address since I can't write a letter there." gemeint ist, halte dies, sollte das tatsächlich die Bedingung für "wann hat ein Objekt eine Adresse" sein, für höchst problematisch, schließlich verschicken wir im digitalen Zeitalter eben nicht mehr nur Briefe, sondern brauchen primär digitale Navigationspunkte (das schien mir der originäre Sinn von OSM zu sein).
Mackie Mapper (2018-09-29 09:12:44+00:00): PPS: Mir war nicht bewusst, mit der letzten Änderung den Tag "natural=tree" entfernt zu haben, das war jedenfalls keinesfalls meine Absicht. Ich hatte lediglich zusätzlich eine Adresse hinzugefügt, jedenfalls meiner Erinnerung nach. Zum Zeitpunkt der Änderung schien mir beides möglich: Ein Objekt als Baum zu definieren und diesem zugleich eine Adresse zu geben.
kartonage (2018-09-29 15:57:33+00:00): Manchmal macht iD komische Sachen, kein Problem. :)
Das Problem mit Geocodern ist, dass sie alle möglichen Suchen von Nutzern abfangen müssen. Nominatim (die Suche auf osm.org) ist keinesfalls perfekt und hat noch viele Verbesserungen vor sich. Google als Datenkrake und mit viel Geld hat hier definitiv technische Vorteile. OSM ist in der Hinsicht auch anders als G-Maps und mehr Geodatenbank im Kern. Die Hauptkarte ist nur eine der vielen Möglichkeiten die vorhandenen Daten darzustellen.Theoretisch wäre es auch möglich eine Karte zu erstellen, bei der das von dir gewünschte einfach dargestellt (ohne jetzt einen Namen zu setzen). Was zum Beispiel aber über andere Dienste auch noch möglich ist, ist sowas: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/untitled-map_251866
//
Das mit dem Brief ist natürlich recht simpel ausgedrückt, aber hauptsächlich arbeitet man mit Koordinaten oder Lageverhältnissen. Hausnummern folgen in der Hinsicht eigentlich der Konvention sich an Häusern oder zugehörigen Geländen zu befinden. Geocoder können eigentlich auch umliegende Adressen zu adresslosen Objekten zuordnen, wenn sie wollen.
//
Zum Namen nochmal: Von offizieller Seite gibt es für die Naturdenkmäler selten Namen, nur eine Referenznummer und Beschreibung. Die Beschreibung ist in der Regel der Genus. Ansonsten sind die Bäume namenlos. Beschreibende Elemente finden sich in den tags wieder. Anders wäre, wenn da ein Namensschild stehen würde. Ich versteh den Hintergrund, aber in der Regel wird es versucht zu vermeiden, etwas nur anzupassen damit es auf der Hauptkarte schön oder gesondert dargestellt wird. Wo ich aber definitiv zustimme ist, dass Bäume mit besonderer Bedeutung (natural_monument) etwas anders gerendert werden sollten. Ich würde es zumindest so machen. Aber ich bin nicht Maintainer der Hauptkarte. So grundsätzlich ist es wohl auch einfach ein recht schwieriges Objekt um das von dir gewünschte zu erreichen. Andere Objekte werden oft signifikanter behandelt bzw stechen besser heraus.
Mackie Mapper (2018-09-29 20:14:16+00:00): Danke für die Erklärungen. 

> Anders wäre, wenn da ein Namensschild stehen würde.

Ich bin mir zu 90% sicher, dass der Baum ein Namensschild bzw. eine Infotafel direkt davor stehen hat. Was genau ändert sich dadurch?
viloan (2018-09-28 23:31:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
flohoff (2018-09-29 13:35:32+00:00): Hallo Ratz,
in diesem und diversen anderen Changesets hast du systematisch von mir als landuse=forest gemappte flächen zu natural=scrub gemacht. Ich habe dir bereits in einem zurückliegenden Changeset geschrieben das ich das für falsch halte. Ich habe angemerkt das das umtaggen nur dazu führt das wir das hin und her taggen solange wir keinen konsens haben.

Ich habe jetzt hier die offensichtlichen umtaggings zurückgetagged und ich möchte dich bitten das stumpfe umtaggen zu unterlassen solange wir da keinen konsens haben.

Flo
ulmtuelp (2018-10-01 10:55:14+00:00): Kleiner Park: Objekt überlappend, kein Merkmal nur Name,  Liegt im größeren Parkgelände. 
Kleiner Weg: hat keine Verbindung, kein Merkmal. Bitte überprüfen.
pangoSE (2018-09-29 09:40:02+00:00): Hej.
Välkommen till OSM.
Du tog bort 2 vägar här utan att skriva det i din kommentar eller ange en källa.
Har det byggts om sen Bing fotot togs?
Har du varit på plats?
Mvh
Egil