piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Lee Carré (2021-10-14 08:18:43+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

A URL alone is meaningless.

“Contradictory and unnecessary information - bridge or tunnel tag has value =no”

Your boundary box includes jurisdictions where no such changes were made.

Worse, it spans the Atlantic, affecting 2 continents. Please make much smaller changeset areas in future: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Glassman (2021-10-15 02:40:56+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.

#TIP: Instead of deleting the bad address, just update the address. That saves the history of the object.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112480266
Glassman (2021-10-15 02:39:00+00:00): #TIP: we don't use descriptive names. The tag building=house is sufficient. Can you remove the name tag on used on many of your contributions?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112480292
tonyf1 (2021-10-13 23:00:18+00:00): Hi, as mentioned before, it may be better to work sequentially in reverse date order to avoid conflicts.
tonyf1 (2021-10-14 03:47:07+00:00): Sebastian, would you be available for a video call with Andrew and me? Private mail me or Andrew Harvey if OK. Tony
TrickyFoxy (2021-10-17 10:43:30+00:00): 👋 
Не забывайте выпрямлять здания. После того как нарисовали здание нажмите Q
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112480389
pokib27301 (2021-11-15 17:39:01+00:00): нажимаю на Q не чего не происходит((
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112480389
TrickyFoxy (2021-11-15 17:44:59+00:00): Хм, а через контекстное меню работает? https://i.imgur.com/JopTV80.png
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112480389
limes11 (2021-10-14 06:02:05+00:00): Hi,

I understand we map a few international institutions but one that sets rules for orthography of the Dutch language? Is OSM the right place for this? Where do we draw the line?

Also, shouldn't Suriname be included? Wikipedia suggests that.

Cheers
JeroenvanderGun (2021-10-14 20:19:31+00:00): This was inspired by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:political_division%3Dlinguistic_community

I don't have a complete answer as to where to draw the line, but the maintenance burden introduced by this is negligible since the boundaries of the Netherlands and the Flemish Community are rather stable. Minor improvements to boundary ways are automatically reflected in all associated relations without any extra effort.

Suriname is not a member of the Taalunie treaty, instead there is a separate association treaty between the Taalunie and Suriname. I added description:en=* to clarify.
limes11 (2021-10-16 10:57:48+00:00): Okay, thanks. I comprehend indicating regions where certain languages are spoken. An organsiation that is responsible for setting rules of orthography is encyclopaedically interesting, but OSM? Anyways, it's there now, it won't change anytime soon, so let's keep it. 

Cheers
ivanbranco (2025-07-09 09:35:04+00:00): Hi Yod4z,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992569328
here building:min was supposed to be min_level, min_height or something else?

thansk and good mapping
Yod4z (2025-07-09 10:05:39+00:00): sorry id bug some time ^^
corrected
jmsbert (2021-10-15 18:33:46+00:00): Hi yopaseopor, I am wondering about the contures of the bare_rock you added 2 days ago (way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992569967)
What was the source for your edit? In your changeset only "Grafcan" is mentioned - but this imagery was taken long time before the vulcanic eruption.
The bare_rock you added does not fit to the actual extents of the lava and overlaps with the polygon relation all the other mappers are working on: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13249829

I am reverting your mapping for buildings that still exist on the ground, e.g. way 989160488
yopaseopor (2021-10-16 08:56:39+00:00): Hey, Why are you reverting my job??
The bare rock has date!! We have Cabildo la Palma drone images and Copernicus information, also with Grafcan imagery
It is important to the data to manage it every day, not only the total!! You are breaking the map with lava's day. Please recover my job of lava's day. I wish to do all the lava days. And also please speak to the Spanish Community before acting!!
Glassman (2021-10-15 02:43:51+00:00): #TIP: When editing across large areas like this edit, save and upload before moving to another distant area. Not doing so makes reviewing edits difficult.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112480552
Sandal man (2021-10-14 15:08:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992570276/history#map=17/43.23067/-1.60382
Hola, creo que olvidaste las etiquetas.
Uranzu (2021-10-14 17:17:10+00:00): Arreglado. Gracias por el aviso.
Sandal man (2021-10-14 18:26:13+00:00): De nada :-)
timmito (2021-10-14 01:03:40+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Ich habe deinen Änderungssatz revertiert. Bitte keine Sperrungen von wenigen Tagen eintragen. https://www.schwalbach.de/Pressemitteilungen/Vollsperrung-Am-Flachsacker-am-Montag-und-Dienstag.html https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction
Sandal man (2021-10-15 19:26:11+00:00): Hi, what is this line?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992574532
user_177389 (2021-10-15 20:00:15+00:00): Hello,

that should be the new part of boundary line, cut off from here: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/925513340

Best regards
Mario
Sandal man (2021-10-22 14:20:49+00:00): Hi Mario, Sorry to ask, but when do you finish the line?
Regards Jan
user_177389 (2021-10-22 16:26:09+00:00): Hello Jan,

just repaired the boundary relations. Ask here for: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112458103

Best regards,
Mario
Sandal man (2021-10-24 09:46:11+00:00): Sorry but this line https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992574532#map=15/43.1021/-9.1591 has still no tags or a relation, so why it is on the map?
user_177389 (2021-10-24 10:34:30+00:00): The creator had some effort and maybe the way is correct. Did you ask https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112458103 if he wanted to continue there?
Sandal man (2021-10-24 13:19:04+00:00): Sorry I don't understand it, you are the creator of that line, so only you knows what it is I think?
user_177389 (2021-10-24 16:34:20+00:00): I didn't create it, I cut it off. Of course she got a new ID with a new history. Look at the middle nodes.
Sandal man (2021-10-24 17:56:25+00:00): I will check it again. 
Thanks
Glassman (2021-10-15 02:32:51+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112481283
Glassman (2021-10-15 02:32:46+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112481309
Glassman (2021-10-15 02:33:05+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112481322
Glassman (2021-10-15 02:36:29+00:00): #TIP: We label these as amenity=shelters. You could also add the tag leisure=playground to the shelter outline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112481361
Glassman (2021-10-15 02:36:41+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112481372
Glassman (2021-10-15 02:37:36+00:00): #TIP: we don't use descriptive names. The tag building=apartments is sufficient. Can you remove the name tag?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112481398
Benjamin Muller (2021-10-14 14:00:14+00:00): This edit improves routing, but does not adhere to local mapping practice with respect to buffered bike facilities. Track is now double mapped on some segments. Will leave for now, as some downstream construction and double tagging must also be resolved, but will update in the future.
CycleStreets (2021-10-15 13:28:06+00:00): We didn't add the original track - which someone else had added. The problem was that it was impossible to get to it. Obviously do resolve the double-track problem, but while the second one is there it should at least be routable.
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:19:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:19:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
Diacritic (2021-10-14 00:31:21+00:00): Hi Stevo,

Was checking out some updates randomly and I came across this edit. Quite a lot of the turn lanes seem to split from the main carriageway well before the points where the roadway split. Way 976266396 is a good example.

As a result of this, routing software would have problems providing directions correctly: the turn announcement would be too early, and it loses the ability for drivers to perform a late merge (ie, I can still enter the turn lane well before where the split is.) The geometry of the turn off will cause issues as well: instead of announcing a left turn, it is likely that the turnoff will be interpreted as a "fork" in the road, giving unnecessary and confusing turn instructions to vehicles travelling straight.

Could I suggest that a) the turn lanes we represented as a separate way only when there is physical separation (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Motorway_with_links_and_destinations) and that the turn:lanes keys are used instead?

Separately, I also see you split Fosters Road into a dual carriageway w992580619. Is this really necessary? There is no physical separation for almost the entire stretch of the road, and the only obstruction are two small traffic islands. Would it not be easier, simpler and more accurate to leave as a single carriageway, and add a two traffic_calming island nodes where required?

Lastly, regarding T-intersections for dual Carriageways. MY interpretation of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway#How_to_map is that when two dual carriageways meet in a T intersection, it is better to map as a box, rather than a < shape. (while not authoritative, mapbox has a good guide https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/mapping-for-navigation/modeling-intersections-for-map-navigation/).

I realise this is a length comment! Happy to discuss further.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
MarcoR (2021-10-14 10:24:45+00:00): Ciao! Benvenuta/o su OpenStreetMap!
Non sono del luogo ma mi sembra che le tue modifiche siano valide. Per quanto riguarda i nomi in dialetto, invece di indicarli insieme al nome in italiano suggerirei di inserirli in "name:lij" ("lij" è il codice da usare nel caso di dialetto ligure). In Sardegna la comunità locale ha deciso di inserire tutto in "name" ma in genere si preferisce inserire ogni lingua/dialetto separatamente. Vedi la regola su https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Nomi#Localizzazione_linguistica ; per qualsiasi informazione puoi entrare in contatto con la comunità italiana usando una delle modalità elencate in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Contact (consiglio la mailing list oppure il gruppo Telegram).
Buona mapping,
Marco.
dzamper (2021-10-17 10:57:29+00:00): Chyba coś się popsuło, w niektórych relacjach linki do wikipedii i wikidanych są błędnie ujęte w [] albo nawet i w [[]]
elot360 (2021-10-17 12:29:04+00:00): Przy kopiowaniu znaczników relacji (W JOSMie istnieje taka opcja) nie wiedzieć czemu wszystkie zawsze się wklejają z [[]], używałem tej opcji żeby trochę przyspieszyć pracę. Nie byłem pewien czy jest konieczność usuwania z nich tych kwadratowych nawiasów, skoro się wkleja w takiej a nie innej formie, rozumiem że trzeba jednak usiąść i te nawiasy pousuwać?
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:19:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-16 23:20:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118570176 where the changeset comment is: Edits von TheFreeBird auf eigenen Wunsch zurückgesetzt, da unzulässige Quelle verwendet
KarolOliveira (2021-10-14 00:43:53+00:00): Correção: Jardim Alvorada
fkv (2021-10-14 00:57:46+00:00): Sorry, der Kommentar hätte in den Revert von Changeset 101708032 gehen sollen. Hab die zwei verwechselt, weil beide die Ziffern 3, 0 und 2 hinten haben.
Rizki IRM-ED (2022-12-13 07:20:57+00:00): Hi Riyadi IRM-RV. Your edit looks awesome, but I suggest you to improve building (id 992590061) due crossing with water body (id 316839978). If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/142907367). Thank you.
willkmis (2021-10-17 00:42:27+00:00): Hey AV Safe Streets,
I noticed there was some back and forth on this highway designation. Looking online, I don't see any sources that CA 122 is an official state route, and I wasn't able to find any evidence on street-level imagery that it's signed on the ground either. Are you sure this is a real state highway? I'd appreciate it if you pointed me toward the evidence you had for adding it.
Best,
Will
nfx2851 (2021-10-14 09:30:12+00:00): 感恩
cserpell (2021-10-15 19:17:52+00:00): Genial que te diste el trabajo de marcar el humedal, a mi me había dado lata porque son muchísimos puntos. Lo que marcaste corresponde al lado del municipio de Villa Alemana. ¿Continua legalmente en la couma de Quilpué? Saludos!
GustavoE (2021-10-25 21:30:19+00:00): Hice el polígono por medio de JOSM, así es más rápido sin ir punto a punto, y sobre tu consulta, el área reconocida como humedal urbano abarca solamente la comuna de Villa Alemana. El municipio de Quilpué no ha solicitado protección oficial para el estero.
cserpell (2021-10-26 01:00:43+00:00): ¡Muchas gracias por la respuesta!
tastrax (2021-10-17 02:05:42+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
booktiger (2022-04-30 05:23:57+00:00): I am a native. Residential area 992613766 unfinished. You can judge whether the community is completed by whether there are parked private cars on the satellite image.
Warin61 (2021-10-14 06:55:09+00:00): Are not 'State Forests' operated to produce timber? As such they are not 'parks' nor 'nature conservation' areas. Those are secondary rolls... OSM should map the primary roll ..
Warin61 (2021-10-14 06:58:15+00:00): The way tagged here as Fryers Range State Forest (992153454, v7) looks to overlap the Fryers Range Nature Conservation Reserve...
Warin61 (2021-10-14 21:48:05+00:00): MapshareVic is copyright and not approved for use in OSM?
See

https://www.delwp.vic.gov.au/copyright
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue

Please cease using this data.

I have deleted Fryers Range State Forest way 992153454. and restored the relation for Fryers Range State Forest that was effected by a past changeset.
Diacritic (2021-10-15 10:03:36+00:00): Hey Warin, et al.

Came across this conversation while looking at recent conversations.

The list of acceptable sources for data includes the Vicmap datasets; the websites of which then direct to mapshare as a way to ‘explore’ this data. Perhaps this is a confusion of terminology, more than it is an ineligible data source?
Syl (2021-10-15 14:52:12+00:00): Bonjour, je ne suis pas sûr que ce soit le bon arrêt pour cette référence STAR, à ma connaissance aucun bus STAR ne passe dans l'enceinte de la gare routière.
mga_geo (2021-10-18 05:28:33+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai utilisé la version GTFS_2021.2.0.0_20211025_20211107 de l'open data de Rennes Métropole.
C'est ma première utilisation suite au passage en format 2.0.0. J'ai peut-être des erreurs dans mes critères de sélection des arrêts suite à ce changement de format.
Pour la précision des positions je suis surpris, précédemment c'était excellent (moins de 15 mètres) sur tous les arrêts que j'avais contrôlé (est de Rennes et secteur de Cesson).
Marc
Syl (2021-10-20 00:10:30+00:00): Je viens d'enlever la ref STAR de cet arrêt.
maraf24 (2021-10-23 10:01:05+00:00): "oznaczenie przedszkola jako szkoły podstawowej/średniej"
Po co?
olo81 (2022-04-26 16:46:04+00:00): kolejny babol do poprawy 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3730014164
tastenmensch (2021-11-01 13:09:12+00:00): Ist Amöbe umgangssprachlich oder ein offizieller NAme?
ALoK (2021-11-02 08:53:45+00:00): Das ist KEIN offizieller Straßenname gemäß amtlichen "Verzeichnis Leipziger Straßennamen".
Der Name wurde gemäß 
http://www.leipziger-osten.de/content/stadt-umbauen/abgeschlossene-stadtumbauprojekte/stadtteilpark-rabet/
von den Planern geprägt und seitdem immer wieder benutzt, z.B.
https://www.german-architects.com/de/architecture-news/reviews/freiraumkultur-mit-brombeer-und-amobe
Auch die deutschsprachige Wikipedia bezeichnet den Weg so, vgl. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabet_(Park)
Dawid2849 (2021-10-14 09:57:15+00:00): Ta droga już ma nadany numer?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Syl (2021-10-15 09:57:47+00:00): Bonjour, un grand nombre des arrêts ajoutés ici ont l'air de correspondre à des arrêts de métro (déjà présents) plutôt qu'à des arrêts de bus. A quoi cela correspond dans le fichier source que vous avez utilisé (je l'aurais bien fait moi-même mais vous n'avait pas précisé la source) ?
Un de ces arrêts inexistants (J.F. Kennedy) venant d'un précédent import avait été supprimé récemment par une autre personne. Quel est le meilleur moyen d'enlever un arrêt sans qu'il soit rajouté à nouveau lors d'un prochain import ?

Merci pour tout ce travail d'import.
mga_geo (2021-10-18 13:55:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Je viens de regarder plus en détail la v2 du fichier gtfs de https://data.explore.star.fr/explore/?sort=title
Il comporte maintenant la ligne de métro et ses arrêts.
Dans les précédentes versions, le métro n'était pas disponible et j'ai fait comme d'habitude. Je commence par créer/modifier les arrêts avant de passer aux lignes. Le numéro de ligne "a" qui a l'arrêt ref 5206 correspond bien au metro.
Marc
Syl (2021-10-20 00:09:29+00:00): Merci pour la correction !
archpdx (2021-10-16 06:33:43+00:00): Why did you place a Big 5 POI in the middle of this parking lot?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
pantufla (2021-11-19 14:00:18+00:00): Hola Edgard, es importante dejar la etiqueta name=* vacía cuando no hay o no se conce el nombre en un edificio o cualquier otro elemento. En este caso has puesto el nombre edificio en varios que hay que revertir manualmente.
booktiger (2021-10-15 08:17:34+00:00): 你们家中国科学院是军事单位？是不是不认字？
Patrik_B (2021-10-14 09:18:15+00:00): I forgot to delete hashtags...
SHARCRASH (2021-10-14 14:55:38+00:00): Hi! Stop all! You've broken the complex MP forest near Kayl! It has many inners which substract the areas not covered by trees! You have to correct it either by reverting your changesets or redo the MP (good luck)! As last time you haven't responded to my comment some time ago about the false positions of roads you had done, i will report you if you don't repair your damage.
SHARCRASH (2021-10-14 14:59:34+00:00): Also stop your irrelevant changeset description!
SHARCRASH (2021-10-14 15:27:45+00:00): In this changeset i noticed that you deleted a business which still exist node 2692257285 Website is still on: 
http://www.bbt-chaud.com/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112490818
salvoconducto (2021-10-14 11:28:33+00:00): Please do use meaningful changeset comments and not always "GiS Source".
Aerond (2021-10-16 08:03:14+00:00): Bra jobbat!
mueschel (2021-10-17 11:57:10+00:00): Hallo,
die Tags 'ascent:forward' und 'ascent:backward' gibt es nicht.
Ich nehme an du meinst 'ascent' und 'descent'?
Karthoo (2021-10-17 13:20:55+00:00): Hallo,
Das Tag "descent" war mir bisher noch nicht begegnet, da es an den meisten Rundtouren ja unnötig ist. Hatte die Edits hier offline gemacht und später hochgeladen und konnte daher auch nicht im Wiki nachschauen. 'ascent:forward' und 'ascent:backward' hörten sich da sinnvoll an, aber wenn es 'descent' schon gibt, kann man das natürlich noch ändern.
Osmwithspace (2022-10-26 20:48:45+00:00): Passt als neue Website diese hier:
https://www.dlr.de/content/de/artikel/standorte/augsburg/ueber-augsburg.html
söm4324 (2022-10-27 06:18:06+00:00): Die passt prima. Die alte ist gar nicht mehr erreichbar. Danke für die Info! Hab es gleich geändert. :)