piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2015-03-19 20:39:12+00:00): No-one's going to complain about changing a typing error such as "mlountain=yes" (and of course a message on the original changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/25971751 explaining the problem would have been nice too).

It's also entirely possible that UK canal boaters might embrace your "sanitary_dump_station" for their pumpouts, but you don't know because you haven't asked them.  Before making mechanical edits such as this please do discuss beforehand in a forum that people actually read (so not just in the echo chamber of the tagging list, or on a wiki page that no-one reads).

I don't make particular use of canal-specific features myself, but I'm sure that there are many people who have either their own map rendering, or a mkgmap-generated Garmin map with a style that enables them to easily see the distance and time to the next pumpout and water point.  Changing these features without telling people that you're going to means that they will silently disappear off people's maps, and they won't know why; they'll just think that "OpenStreetMap data isn't as good as it used to be".
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-19 21:00:56+00:00): If you have a problem with a particular node such as #273021554, please consider reverting that node, or contacting the person who made the change first.

amenity=pumpout was changed as it was the only use of that key worldwide, not for any other reason.  Perhaps I should have tagged that to an older tagging scheme... that's something that could be discussed.
jeffgirard (2015-03-23 13:31:08+00:00): Why I still not seeing my changes from 4 days ago?
jlcod (2015-03-19 18:03:15+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei openstreetmap. Die opening_hours müssen einer bestimmten syntax entsprechen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours), auf dieser Seite kann man diese prüfen: http://ypid.de/~osm/evaluation_tool/ 
Habe den Eintrag entsprechend angepasst. Hilfreich wären noch Informationen über dispensing=yes/no und wheelchair=yes/limited/no wie in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpharmacy angegeben.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:12:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Nakaner (2015-03-24 16:18:15+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29706929
Nakaner (2015-03-24 16:18:13+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29706929
Nakaner (2015-03-24 16:14:03+00:00): Dass man als Newbie vielleicht manchmal Fehler macht, mag ich vielleicht noch verstehen, aber besonders arg zu hassen lerne ich dich, wenn ich bemerke, dass du ohne Ortskenntnis irgendetwas änderst, bloß weil auf den Bing-Bildern der Kreisverkehr noch nicht gebaut ist. Solltest du weiterhin ohne Ortskenntnis unvorsichtig mappen, bist du bei OSM unerwünscht.
Nakaner (2015-03-24 16:18:08+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29706929
Nakaner (2015-03-24 16:18:11+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29706929
Nakaner (2015-03-24 16:18:10+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29706929
mavl (2019-03-06 17:12:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:12:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Nakaner (2015-03-24 16:18:17+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29706929
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Nakaner (2015-03-24 17:02:20+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29707884
Nakaner (2015-03-24 17:02:22+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29707884
naoliv (2015-03-19 15:00:33+00:00): Marcos, praças e outras áreas não devem ficar grudadas nas ruas.
Nakaner (2015-03-24 17:05:23+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29707975
kreuzschnabel (2018-04-15 07:54:44+00:00): Zu Relation 4684499 – inwiefern fandest du es wichtig, in einer Einbahnstraße (ein Kreisverkehr ist immer eine solche) das Wenden zu verbieten? IMHO eine vollkommen unnötige Verkomplizierung des Datenbestandes.
gormo (2015-03-23 16:00:32+00:00): Hallo, wieso hast du den Bahnhof von disused:railway=station nach railway=station, disused=yes umgetaggt?
gunnar1m (2015-03-23 16:11:15+00:00): Weil http://www.openrailwaymap.org/ dies Tags nicht kennt. Gibt immer Probleme in der Anzeige und beim Suchen
Nakaner (2015-03-24 14:59:08+00:00): Hallo gunnar1m, wir mappen nicht für den Renderer. Weder für OSM Carto noch für die OpenRailwayMap (ich bin einer der Entwickler). Der richtige Weg wäre der hier: https://github.com/rurseekatze/OpenRailwayMap/issues disused:railway=* wird schon noch eines Tages unterstützt werden, aber das ist schlicht und einfach kein Grund, Objekte falsch zu mappen. disused=yes an stillgelegte Objekte zu taggen und sonst die normalen Tags (railway=station usw.) zu verwenden, ist schlicht und einfach falsch! Nicht jeder Datennutzer verwendet/kennt disused=yes und interpretiert die Daten daher falsch. Ich habe das Tagging gerade eben korrigiert.
neiljp (2015-03-24 11:46:47+00:00): Hey Spark! Does this construction actually also encompass the old school buildings?
spark (2015-03-24 11:51:51+00:00): From what I saw walking past and the artist's impressions on the hoardings, it seems like they are demolishing/rebuilding the area that I have marked, and then incorporating the taller buildings to the SE into a new student housing project.
neiljp (2015-04-01 22:21:23+00:00): I went past this on the bus today, and since the hoardings clearly follow the old school buildings I extended the construction area to include them too:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29916945#map=19/57.15514/-2.10172
SomeoneElse (2015-03-23 16:26:03+00:00): You've changed the language on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1435363045/history (and some others) from rs to ru; How do you know the original was Russian and not Serbian (sr)?
mtmail (2015-03-23 19:17:42+00:00): Dammit, you're right. I usually zoom out a lot to get (country) context, but here I assumed it must be 'rs' is russian because a name in Slavik language would look more latin, like for example Ččđšž, and not kyrillic. 

Now I'm reading since 2006 kyrilic is used. Zooming out to district level shows a mix of latin and kyrillic, too.

I will review my other changes as well.

Also sorry about the huge geographic area of the changeset. I know you commented on that a couple of days ago. Since then I split my changes into smaller areas or even just feature by feature. I'm using the Level0 editor so my changset history might look fast (faster than JOSM/ID) but I can assure you every change is manual and "human" (including mistakes I'm afraid).

Thanks for feedback, I really appreciate it.
marczoutendijk (2017-02-02 03:21:13+00:00): Hi,
I would like to point out that you have used the key "restaurant" a number of times, but that is invalid (restaurant is NOT a key), because it is supposed to be the value of amenity.

amenity=fast_food is valid but restaurant=fast_food is not.
See the wiki for its correct use:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity
Ogmios (2015-03-27 20:23:29+00:00): weiter so ;-)
5m4u9 (2015-03-20 07:10:20+00:00): no se debe vulnerar la privacidad de esta familia poniendo el nombre a esta construcción. Si se quiere tener un mapa personalizado, utilizar http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es
SimpleLuke (2015-03-27 14:18:25+00:00): 你好 你这个地方用错了两个标签 请仔细查阅标签的含义再使用 建筑物不应使用landuse=meadow草原标签 办公室不应使用amenity=place_of_worship宗教场所标签 欢迎加入OSM 但也请负责任地编辑地图:-)
Jojo4u (2015-03-20 22:49:55+00:00): Hallo Uli, du hast aus der Kirche ein Multipolygon gemacht, das ist nicht nötig da sie keine Löcher hat. Teile von Gebäuden markiert man mit building:part=yes. Auch bitte immer alle Ways und Punkte der Teile und des Hauptgebäudes übereinander.

LG Joachim
maraf24 (2015-03-31 09:33:12+00:00): Proszę wypełniać pole komentarza do zapisywanych zmian.
Sugerowałbym także korzystanie z lepiej skalibrowanych zdjęć Geoportalu a nie Binga (wybór jest po naciśnięciu B w edytorze).
Lepto (2015-03-19 18:11:54+00:00): Sorry, Quelle nicht angegeben

ele, uic_name, uic_ref :
Bundesamt für Verkehr (BAV), DIDOK 2014
Aleks-Berlin (2017-06-18 21:44:00+00:00): Hi Extrabrandt, amenity=shop is not a valid tag. see OSM wiki. KR, Alex
KKS (2015-09-07 10:29:59+00:00): привіт, ти цим пакетом додав highway=service вздовж повітрофлотського та залізниці. Скільки там транзитом не їздив не бачив там дороги дублера, та й по супутнику не видно. Що то за дорога?  В OSM ось ця лінія  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333626745
NetWormKido (2015-03-23 16:25:32+00:00): Привет. Ты добавил несколько дорог в дачах. Их принято обозначать через hw=service а не hw=residential (residential - именованые улицы в нп). Для главного проезда допустимо hw=unclassified И следи за разрывами дорожного графа - дороги одного уровня должны быть объеденены в связаный граф (район ЛЭП)
romanshuvalov (2015-03-23 18:00:40+00:00): Я рисовал со спутника и не знаю, именованные проезды или нет. Бывает, что даже мелкие проезды оказываются именованными. Как быть в этом случае? неизвестную улицу, которая напоминает "главную", помечать unclassified, а другие неизвестные, которые меньше напоминают главную, помечать service? Или вообще все unclassified?

Про связанный граф не понял. Все улицы так или иначе соединяются с уже имеющимися. "Болтающиеся в воздухе" если и есть, то только там, где я совсем не знаю местности и рисую по снимкам. Или имелось в виду другое?
NetWormKido (2015-03-23 18:25:01+00:00): http://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-SAM/routing-map
romanshuvalov (2015-03-23 21:50:37+00:00): Спасибо. И правда, пару ошибок допустил. Исправлю.
Domiss (2015-05-26 06:59:32+00:00): Połączyłeś w tym zestawie w jedną całość linie drogi 367 w Szarocinie, gdy tylko jeden jej króciótki kawałek należał do relacji Głównego Szlaku Sudeckiego, a dwa pozostałe nie. Na przyszłość albo wcale nie łącz linii w jedną, albo przynajmniej przed połączeniem sprawdź, czy nie tylko mają takie same tagi, ale również czy są członkami tych samych relacji. 
Teraz dzielę linię drogi z powrotem i poprawiam relacje szlaków.
emes (2015-05-26 08:39:35+00:00): Przepraszam, musiałem to przeoczyć. Następnym razem będę uważniej sprawdzał przynależność do relacji.
GerdP (2015-10-18 07:38:16+00:00): please review:
would it be okay to change the tag
highway=prepoposed to the well documented
highway=proposed ?
Pavel Bokr (2015-10-18 09:35:36+00:00): Only planned highway by owner of estate (developer). Owner (developer) presented their plans to local municipality only (approved by local municipality) but not yet permited by local building authority (local level of state administration - government). So I found a rare used tag preproposed in taginfo and I use it for this situation (I woud use proposed after building permission and I want to have planned highways by developers in map data for "city developlment modeling"). Is it OK?
GerdP (2015-10-18 10:03:43+00:00): thanks for the feedback. I try to reduce the number of tags which express some kind
of planning. See also 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/how-to-tag-a-quot-highway-quot-that-doesn-t-exist-tt5857111.html
What about using proposed and add a note reg. the current status?
Pavel Bokr (2015-10-18 12:17:33+00:00): Yes, I can use proposed with a note.

When I tagged this I try to find on wiki something about planning states but I'm not found how to distinguish some phases of preparing highways and I evaluate tag proposed (For roads that are about to be built, but where any construction work hasn't yet been started) as too advance phase to use on my case. So I try to find something on taginfo.

IMHO It will be better to have some clearly information on wiki about using proposed or other tags with different phases of preparing highways including my case "prepropsed" - plans before approving by authority or in process of approving - For roads that are *MAYBE* about to be built (I used/need OSM data for city analysis of case if this highways will be build).

I'm sorry for my horrible english.
Pavel Bokr (2015-10-18 14:06:58+00:00): I changed tags highway=preproposed to highway=proposed i this and also i my other changesets in our city: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34710157 , it can be verified by http://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22highway%22%3D%22preproposed%22+global&R

But I think it would be good to have some tag/tags to distinguish some phases of preparing highways - e.g. still not approved plans - still publicly discussed with authorities (this case) vs. approved and permited detailed and fixed proposals already waiting/prepared for building (we have some any other cases in our city) etc.

In this case I want to also include a still publicly discused highways proposals for analysis future bus stop accessibility in our city above OSM data http://osm.kraluvdvur.cz/kraluv-dvur-bus-stop-accessibility-model-future.jpg
GerdP (2015-10-18 14:37:08+00:00): thanks a lot!
Please join the discussion, it is very easy, 
and don't worry about your english, it is very good
jendrusk (2015-03-26 08:13:49+00:00): Doobre.... na prewde dobre :) Ten komentarz 'made my day'
Jojo4u (2015-03-25 20:59:58+00:00): Sorry, aber das ist kein Kliff, ich sehe keinen nackten Fels oder sehr steil aufragende Landschaft. Das passendere Tag wäre hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dembankment

LG Joachim
Uli Maier (2015-03-26 09:03:28+00:00): Habe es geändert 
LG Uli
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29747081
Smoke_Master (2015-03-19 20:14:23+00:00): Kleine Korrekturen
kayle (2015-03-20 05:19:00+00:00): Ahoj, aby šlo hľadať čísla v prípadoch keď neexistuje ulica, je potrebné pridať ešte addr:place s názvom obce. Viď napr. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/48.76380/18.5714 A odporúčam tiež skúsiť editor JOSM (josm.openstreetmap.de) bude sa ti lepšie editovať.
kayle (2015-03-20 05:26:21+00:00): Ach prepáč, JOSM som ti už spomínal, strácam prehľad čo som komu písal. :)
anirud (2015-03-22 14:22:56+00:00): JOSM používam, ale na menšie zmeny aj iD.
Skúsil som ten addr:place, neprejavilo sa to hneď, uvidím zajtra.
smaprs (2015-03-20 19:02:13+00:00): Thanks!
Monitor (2015-03-24 06:25:53+00:00): Какие ваши доводы в пользу повышения статуса Восточное-Гавриловское шоссе?
Monitor (2015-03-23 11:46:48+00:00): После этой правки 3 дороги оказались оторваными от M7. Вернул все назад.
p.s. Пока Вы осваиваете OSM воздержитесь от удаления чужих объектов. Даже если они Вам кажуться неправильными, возможно они нарисованы не просто так.
km2bp (2017-12-29 19:51:43+00:00): Płot Zespołu Szkół Ekonomicznych jest źle narysowany i nie posiada bram .  https://goo.gl/maps/nGfgFbvLAi82
gormur (2015-03-25 00:53:44+00:00): Ouch. This was an unfortunate slip. Was working to manually merge in an external data set, and the whole thing got sucked up. Sorry. This is a legal source, and I will commit to clean it up by merging into existing data.
AgusQui (2015-04-05 17:11:36+00:00): ¿Porque le pusiste 30 de diciembre a esta parada?
emacsen (2015-03-20 01:11:15+00:00): When you say Bing Maps, do you mean the imagery in JOSM or Bing Maps the website?
Zian Choy (2016-07-13 04:36:39+00:00): Bing Maps in JOSM
emacsen (2016-07-13 09:36:32+00:00): There's no way Bing imagery can tell you what the speed limit is. So if it's Bing Maps. it needs to be removed.
emacsen (2015-03-20 02:40:09+00:00): What is the source of this data?
Robert Ancell (2015-03-20 03:00:46+00:00): I've walked the area and looked at them and I first thought they were water tanks but they have doors on them.

A google image search brings up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oranga#/media/File:State_Housing_in_Oranga,_Auckland,_1947.jpg which shows them there at the time the area was subdivided.

The final piece that confirmed is for me is from the book "Beyond the State" (ISBN 978-0-143-57065-3) which talked about how often sheds were built with state houses. On page 47 it says:

"...in the Fletchers contract at Auckland's Harp of Erin, for example, concrete water pipes of very large diameter were used to make sheds in the back garden."

Given how close this is to these houses I took this as confirmation of what they are.
emacsen (2015-03-20 03:41:16+00:00): My question/concern is that it looks to me like an import. It looks like you made 3000 nodes in this changeset, with 245 buildings, each of which is very intricately drawn. While that's not impossible, it looks like it's more likely to be an import from another data set. Are you saying you drew each object from the Bing imagery?
Robert Ancell (2015-03-20 06:26:11+00:00): I traced one from the Bing imagery and then copy and pasted the rest into their correct location. As they're made from standard concrete pipe they're all the same size.

I had just skipped them when draing the rest of the buildings until I was sure what they should be tagged with.
KristenK (2015-07-27 21:19:08+00:00): Hello. In this changeset. You edited the following relation: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4695424

One of the Ways for this relation have been deleted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/173633422

I am not familiar with this part of the world, do you know if you could update the relation?
adrianojbr (2015-07-27 23:44:59+00:00): hi. I deleted this relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4695424 (only_straight_on), because it is redundant with the relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5224050 (no_u_turn). thanks for remind me.
*Martin* (2015-03-20 06:12:45+00:00): Ahoj

Vidim ze sa o nieco snazis a zatial ti to neide, len si volaco pokazil. Skus si naprv prosim pozriet nejake clanky a navody k OpenStreetMap a az potom editovat. A ako zaciatocnik urcite nie hned z OsmAnd ale normalne od pocitaca.

V pripade otazok pis na slovenske OSM forum osm_sk@googlegroups.com.

Dakujem
emacsen (2015-03-20 02:55:55+00:00): I don't recall this import being discussed on the import list or having an import page on the wiki.

 If it was, can you point it out to me. If it wasn't, it needs to stop until it can be reviewed by the community.
emacsen (2015-03-20 02:59:03+00:00): Where is the source of this data?
It appears to be an import, and if so, I don't recall it being discussed on the import list. If it was, please point me to it.
maning (2015-03-20 07:00:19+00:00): @emacsen, this is not an import.  @chatt980's edits are regular osm edits.  They are a local government staff updating the map for their disaster risk reduction efforts.  We trained them in using OSM.
See: https://www.gfdrr.org/sites/gfdrr/files/publication/Community-Mapping-for-Disaster-Risk-Reduction-and-Management.pdf

Hope that clears up your questions.
emacsen (2015-03-20 10:04:17+00:00): @manning- if this is not an import, that's fine, but it sure looks like an import based on the specificity and speed of the data being placed on the map. As for the edits themselves, the tagging is very "off". Do you/your group have a plan to fix/clean this data?
maning (2015-03-20 10:10:46+00:00): @emacsen, :) Yes, @chatt980 is getting better in using iD, but I'm sure this is not automated knowing the skill level of the contributor.  True, there are issues with the tagging.  Instead of fixing it myself, we try to solve this by explaining to the contributor directly.  I will schedule an in-person discussion which works best.
emacsen (2015-03-20 10:17:27+00:00): @maning, I get worried when I hear "schedule an in person discussion" regarding time. This user is very active in their editing (which is fine) but there are real issues here- such as specifying source (is it really just using Bing imagery?) and there are a large number of tagging issues. As for going back- I would expect that the user go back and fix each of these. if they can't- then I'd think it'd be better to propose a mechanical edit- because as things stand, the data is improperly tagged. The saving grace may be that (hopefully) it's all mis-tagged in the same way, which would mean it'd be easy to mechanically fix- but I think we can agree that it shouldn't stay the way it is.
maning (2015-03-20 10:25:07+00:00): I appeal that you don't implement mechanical fix for now.  I'm pretty sure they use Bing, local knowledge and nothing else.  Let us please deal with this through our local community.  If there is a need to fix tags (which I agree we should), please allow the local PH community to do this.
emacsen (2015-03-20 10:30:23+00:00): I won't implement a mechanical edit here, but I am saying that they need to fix the tagging and it should be relatively soon. My initial concern was "Is this an import?" but at this point its "This data is tagged poorly". When I hear about calling an in person meeting to discuss, I get worried about how long it will take to resolve this issue.

I agree that training is your best bet here, but for the sake of these people's valuable time, it might make sense for you/your team to script a repair here.
maning (2015-03-20 10:33:41+00:00): Thanks.  As I suggested, we will discuss with the community (both the specific contributor and also the local PH community).  We will improve the tagging based on our community agreed tags.  Thank you for pointing this out.
chatt980 (2015-03-23 03:26:37+00:00): What is our basis in tagging the agricultural land? And we are not familiar with the import based. Meantime we will pause the editing in our area. What we edited was just from rice field to agricultural. We do hope this concerned be settled ASAP.
maning (2015-03-24 06:01:45+00:00): Hi Ate chat980, I've edited an area to demonstrate the proper tags: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29696558

For example:
for farmlands, we use the tags: landuse=farm and crop=rice.  No need to add the name=Ricefield.
for fisponds, we use the tags: landuse=aquaculture, natural=water.  No need to add the name=fishpond
for residential areas: no need to add the tag name=houses unless there is a specific name for that residential area.
paulmach (2015-04-08 01:40:38+00:00): Hi,

The cycleways you added just looks like shoulders on the side of the road, not separated bike paths. Is that what you see on the ground?
TheDutchMan13 (2015-04-08 04:51:09+00:00): I got a note from a strava user saying how heavy the road was used for bike riders so i assumed it was a bike route. I may have gone to far. It's probably best to delete  the route and tag the road.
naoliv (2015-03-20 11:03:15+00:00): Joel, não pode copiar informações do Google Maps.
parukhin (2015-04-11 15:00:10+00:00): Коллега, приветствую.
Подскажите, зачем со зданий удалили теги building=* ?
Alexey Vazhnov (2015-03-24 01:26:30+00:00): Спасибо!
catoblepa (2015-03-20 12:54:13+00:00): eliminato il tag office=government !!
eggie (2018-12-29 13:22:04+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... bij deze alsnog.. opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Theodin (2015-03-28 00:01:13+00:00): Hi mjacke,
Wilkommen bei Openstreetmap!

Ein kleiner Tip:
Vieles bei Openstreetmap hat nicht nur einen Namen, sondern wichtiger ist der sog. "tag". Er beschreibt (in englisch), um was es sich handelt. Eine Fahrschule ist zB amenity=driving_school. Viele dieser tags stehen im Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a
Soviel in dieser Kürze.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen und Benutzen von OSM!
Theodin
Nakaner (2015-03-24 17:22:16+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29708379
Nakaner (2015-03-24 17:10:30+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29708091
emacsen (2015-03-20 10:11:08+00:00): I realize you're a new mapper- are you aware that you aren't allowed to add data from Google Maps to OSM?
Daxeon (2015-03-20 10:36:44+00:00): I am not technically using google maps to add the data I am using local knowledge but just using it as more of a pin point.
emacsen (2015-03-20 10:45:43+00:00): I don't know what that you mean by "using it as a pin point", but you can't use Google Maps at all, especially in the UK (as opposed to US law, which is more lenient in this area), Google also takes a very strict viewpoint when talking about their data, so you can't use Google Maps as a reference.
Nakaner (2015-03-24 17:08:15+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29708039
pauliusz (2015-03-20 10:26:20+00:00): Muziejus kitam pastate ten. Pataisysiu.