piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Стоян (2017-07-06 21:39:22+00:00): Със сигурност не е на фасадата от към улицата, но е възможно да е в двора. Ще потвърдя. Благодаря, че обърнахте внимание.
Стоян (2017-07-12 14:28:25+00:00): Здравейте,
магазинът наистина съществува.
saintam1 (2017-07-12 22:18:04+00:00): Благодаря, че отделихте време да проверите лично.
luschi (2018-01-27 13:01:49+00:00): Hallo,     
du hast hier einen Wegweiser einen Namen gegeben, https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1104677 
Heißt der Wegweiser so, oder geht der Weg in die Richtung oder ist das der Name der Wanderung??
lg
seichter (2018-01-27 14:14:58+00:00): Am Wegweiser steht dieser Name.
Allerdings steht der noch an zwei weiteren Wegweisern und einer Infotafel in dieser Gasse.
Ich ändere daher name zu description, da das nicht wie sonst zur eindeutigen Identifikation des Wegweisers dienen kann.
eggie (2017-07-06 19:45:06+00:00): You are deleting the landuse here. A starting mapper was mapping here under supervion. What is your intention to delete the landuse here?
eggie (2017-07-06 19:47:29+00:00): reverted.. if you have any questions you are welcome.
Please don't map here for some while. In Holland we import the landuse from the 3shapes. Leisure park is a cover.
siphoe (2017-07-08 15:12:18+00:00): Thanks, eggie
AsgerFrank (2017-07-06 20:26:25+00:00): SDFE Quick Ortofoto er frie data (er muligvis ikke helt det samme som frie grunddata). 
Hentet som WMS i JOSM.
ma-rt-in (2017-07-06 20:40:08+00:00): hallo bitte bei building den value house etc verwenden und nicht terrace bei so einer genauen beschreibung der gebäude. Nähres im Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dterrace
(inactive) WarpathPeacock (2023-05-25 21:37:57+00:00): Hello palimpadum,

I hope this message finds you well! Is there a reason why the access=private tag would be kept on this secondary? Originally applied by you when this was service, this now appears to be an important public road. I am considering removing it. I would appreciate your opinion.

Best,

WarpathPeacock
(inactive) WarpathPeacock (2023-05-25 21:41:29+00:00): The way in question is way 458001858
palimpadum (2023-06-09 18:13:26+00:00): Hello,

long ago. I think I took the tags from the southern part of the road and draw a new line, because it was too much work to align it. Unfortunately I didn´t save the history of some ways in the past. Nowadays I maintain the history.

If it´s an important public road, I would appreciate, if you would correct it. No problem, thank you.
archie (2020-02-07 00:20:51+00:00): Why area=yes here on natural=scrub (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505669754)?
nammala (2017-07-07 03:36:32+00:00): Hi Rb6k,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Liked the idea of improving the neighborhood of your local area and while editing please make sure you maintain the geometry of the edits not overlapping over buidlings and other features which makes better data on OSM.
Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Regards,
nammala
pnorman (2017-07-06 22:22:30+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap,

I just wanted to let you know that I've added an office=lawyer tag to the point you added, to indicate it's a lawyer's office, as well as a bit of clean-up on the address and description.

If you want to join in the local community, we keep in touch in a few ways. One is the Canada-wide mailing list at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca, and another is the monthly Vancouver OpenStreetMap meetup at https://www.meetup.com/OpenStreetMap-Vancouver/
Cascafico (2017-07-07 06:56:53+00:00): Welcome in OSM and thanks for your contibutions!

By the way has tha caravan_site power supply, drinking water, sanitary water dump station?
fkv (2017-08-30 22:37:34+00:00): Dein Wunsch nach einem speziellen Tag für eine Telefonleitung ist verständlich. Das Problem mit communication=line ist, dass es nur den Status "Draft" hat, also noch nicht mal ein fertiges Proposal gibt. Darum wird es kaum verwendet und auch von Renderern nicht unterstützt. power=minor_line auf communication=line zu ändern ist somit faktisch eine Löschung. Weil diese Telefonleitung ein wichtiges Orientierungsmerkmal ist, ändere ich das Tag zurück, damit sie wieder angezeigt wird. Es ist power=minor_line bei Telefonleitungen auch keineswegs falsch, denn die Telefonate werden elektrisch, also mit Strom übertragen.
nurdafur (2017-10-06 08:05:12+00:00): Hallo Eagleeye
Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass du hier den Radweg als separate Linie gezeichnet hast.
Gibt es dafür einen triftigen Grund?
Bei Radwegen, die auf oder direkt an der Strasse liegen, werden normalerweise die Tags cycleway cycleway:left cycleway:right mit entsprechenden Attributen lane opposite_lane track... verwendet.
An dieser Strasse ist dies, wie ich sehe, nicht ganz richtig gemacht worden.
Grüsse Urs
burtlang (2017-07-07 16:51:07+00:00):  Updates to streets and POIs in Oman. #Kaart Ground Survey 2017
5m4u9 (2017-07-08 23:01:16+00:00): mal etiquetado y datos que deben ser cambiados. revertido
literan (2017-07-12 12:20:07+00:00): А https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505703068#map=19/55.82498/37.60688 это не leisure=ice_rink ?
Alexander-II (2017-07-12 12:39:58+00:00): Хм, пожалуй. Поправлю в следующий заход. Спасибо
mavl (2018-11-01 17:02:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
keithonearth (2017-07-07 02:24:51+00:00): I forgot to update the source tag on this changeset, it should read BC Mosaic, not Mapbox.
nammala (2017-07-07 04:02:00+00:00): Hi backman27,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world and the data we add should be ground truth not fictional or random data. Noticed that you have been adding random tags and false fictional data on Map which is not encourgable , make sure you add proper data and don't repeat again.

Regards,
nammala
Littlebtc (2017-09-12 15:53:21+00:00): This should be a false alarm of the OSMCha, as this place really named "𫙮"魚坑, you can see the Chinese Wikipedia:
https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%F0%AB%99%AE%E9%AD%9A%E5%9D%91

 "𫙮" is U+2B66E, a valid CJK word in CJK Unified Ideographs Extension C.
http://glyphwiki.org/wiki/u2b66e
eggie (2017-07-07 07:13:58+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Helaas zit het gras in de knoop met een lus en het Farmland heb je omgezet in residential en zit vastgeplakt aan de weg. Ik kijk wel even.
Wanneer het een erf betreft wordt zoiets getagd als landuse=farm_yard
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50098878
In het begin volgen wij de edits van startende mappers.. zie welkommail.
eggie (2017-07-07 07:28:42+00:00): landuse uit de knoop gehaald en losgemaakt van wegen en het erf van bij nr 5 getagd als landuse=farmyard  even als voorbeeld (zonder tussenstreepje)
residential lig altijd los en wordt gebruikt voor stedelijke bebouwing. Dat is toch hier niet het geval Doe je zelf een poging om nr 3 aan te passen?
eggie (2017-07-07 07:35:09+00:00): De bedoeling is dus dat de landuse (het geen dat je ziet wordt ingevuld) 
Wanneer bij nr 3 bebouwde kom is dan zou het goed getagd zijn. Klopt dat?
eggie (2017-07-07 07:42:40+00:00): Hier zie je o.a.  wat ik gedaan heb
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50100921
en
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50100989
eggie (2017-07-07 08:03:05+00:00): Via PB contact gehad.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-07-07 05:43:13+00:00): Biddut: "barong" masapul "baro nga"
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-07-07 05:44:09+00:00): May pagkakamali dito. Ang Ilokanong "barong" ay dapat "baro nga".
Gh0stz0x (2017-07-07 15:48:10+00:00): Potevi lasciare la casa, la mia domanda è se realmente era chiamata così. Perché non hai risposto? Non siamo cannibali. Se hai bisogno di una mano, clicca sul mio nome è spediscimi un messaggio. Appena ho tempo inserirò un bel po' di abitazioni a Dazio.
Gh0stz0x (2017-07-07 15:50:06+00:00): Dimenticavo, cerca di commentare il changeset. I due puntini non aiutano gli altri mappatori a capire cosa hai fatto. Grazie e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap. ☺️
user_5359 (2017-07-09 17:22:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed (in the water). Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
literan (2017-07-12 14:01:55+00:00): выбросьте етот веспуччи http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=50100314 Поправил.
jaap de vries (2017-09-12 09:06:30+00:00): Beste,
Ik zie dat je huizen die nog moeten worden gebouwd hebt toegevoegd.
Vanmorgen was ik hier en merk op dat op Meester A Datemalaan nrs 33  t/m 53 en GJ Brenkmanlaan nrs 18 t/m 36 verkeerd er op staan. Verander je het even en let je ook op of ze al gebouwd zijn?
de vries (2017-09-14 06:17:10+00:00): hoi Jaap, ik heb mij hier gebaseerd op de bag en PDOK luchtfoto's. Als jij beschikt over eigen waarnemingen kan je deze pand gerust aanpassen.
mvg
jaap de vries (2017-09-14 06:22:52+00:00): Beste ....?
Als ik de Pdok luchtfoto bekijk zie ik duidelijk een nieuwe sloot. Ik snap dan niet dat je dan hier huizen die nog moeten worden gebouwd al op OSM zet.
Misschien wel slim om te weten, ik werk bij het kadaster en bijwerk OSM omdat ik dat leuk vindt.

Jaap de Vries
Constable (2017-07-07 08:42:35+00:00): Hi, why did you create those four nodes? All those four passes look to me already well mapped, there's no need for duplicate nodes.
Take the Foscagno node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4634946582), it already includes the name:en tag plus other information just like altitude.
Cheers
user_5359 (2017-07-11 17:52:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
5m4u9 (2017-07-08 19:19:04+00:00): gracias por editar y mejorar el lugar.
raito (2017-07-08 01:56:38+00:00): Hi. Please don't delete those traffic_sign=city_limit nodes. Those are real data everyone can see on the road. You don't have to do anything because I have restored them: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50121457
raito (2017-07-08 02:04:11+00:00): Speaking about real data, what is the source of your data? I hope you're not copying from Google Map or other maps. Or is it from a government department? I don't think we can use that here either, unless you got permission.
gileri (2017-07-07 23:03:49+00:00): La fontaine au sud existait déjà dans OSM depuis plusieurs années. J'ai retiré cette version.
ToniE (2017-07-07 08:11:01+00:00): Sollte natürlich:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kreuzschnabel/diary/41854

heißen
ToniE (2017-07-07 08:11:12+00:00): Sollte natürlich:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kreuzschnabel/diary/41854

heißen
streinger (2017-07-07 12:36:59+00:00): зачем  здесь лужи у дома рисовать, и обозначать их озером да ещё и с "названием"?
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-25 09:07:34+00:00): Dlaczego niszczysz dane poprzez masowe dodawanie niezweryfikowanych informacji?

Proponowałbym raczej aplikację StreetComplete, pozwala na łatwe zbieranie danych w okolicy którą się zna.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-11-02 22:14:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53464058 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Polish speed limits at the request of the Polish community.  Some are guesses, some licence incompatible.
eggie (2017-07-07 09:42:34+00:00): Je hebt onewaybicycle=no=yes toegevoegd. Geldt dit ook voor fietsers. Anders nog toevoegen oneway:bicycle=no
Erwin van Rijsewijk (2017-07-07 10:14:21+00:00): Heb 'm aangepast
eggie (2017-07-07 12:20:48+00:00): Prima.. mapse verder
eggie (2017-07-07 09:59:32+00:00): Die fietsafslag die je hebt aangebracht heeft de tag oneway=yes en die loopt in de richting van de Meeuwenderweg. Klopt die eenrichting wel? Van noord naar zuid. De nodes liggen verder goed

Graag reactie.
HermanHiddema (2017-07-07 10:12:54+00:00): Ja, die klopt. Van de Trompbrug tot net voor de kruising Griffeweg/Veemarktstraat/Meeuwerderweg is het nu tweebaans gescheiden door strepen. De west-oost richting heeft net voor de kruising een doorsteek gekregen waar je kunt oversteken, en het laatste stukje (3-4 meter ofzo) is nog eenrichting en weer smaller. Als je vanuit de Meeuwerderweg komt moet je recht oversteken richting de Veemarktstraat aan de overkant en daar linksaf het fietspad op.
eggie (2017-07-07 12:25:19+00:00): duidelijk... mapse verder
zvenzzon (2017-07-07 09:22:20+00:00): Thank you!
freebeer (2018-06-08 17:21:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59674604 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-13 15:49:55+00:00): Hi, is way 505783393 actually named (Old) Clay Lane, or is this descriptive? If the latter, then please use either name=Clay Lane if it is still called that, or old_name=Clay Lane if it is no longer the name.

Thanks,
Mike
robw (2017-07-13 16:34:10+00:00): Source docs at http://www.pembrokeshire.gov.uk/content.asp?id=28112&nav=838&parent_directory_id=646 are unclear. Will removed the (Old) for now and add a note.
SomeoneElse (2017-10-29 11:19:21+00:00): Hello,
Does the deletion of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505783410/history and the other edits around 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/39.8654/43.6789 (you'll need to edit the area; many ways have no tags) look OK to you?
I'm asking because you edited there previously.
The mapper who deleted it was accused of fantasy mapping in the past.  Is this the same again or does it really exist?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2017-10-29 11:19:34+00:00): Bonjour,
Est-ce que la suppression de http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505783410/history et les autres modifications autour
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/39.8654/43.6789 (vous aurez besoin de modifier la zone, de nombreuses façons n'ont pas de balises) vous semble OK?
Je demande parce que vous avez édité là auparavant.
Le cartographe qui l'a supprimé a été accusé de cartographie fantasmatique dans le passé. Est-ce la même chose ou est-ce que ça existe vraiment?
Meilleures salutations,
Andy
Ghybu (2017-11-03 23:37:41+00:00): Hello,
Unfortunately, he continues to give bad informations...

Thank you for your vigilance
Ghybu
rene78 (2018-07-27 22:17:47+00:00): Hmmm... when I watched them play at this court there was a net involved. So shouldn't it be Sepak Takraw then instead of Chinlone?
user_6110846 (2017-11-17 19:09:28+00:00): Перейдіть на програму з josm de Програма мыстить набір готових наборів теґів  тобто вам н еприйдеть ся париться ш овикоритати . Також з програми є прямий вихід на інструкції . Спробувавши раз Ви відчуєте різницю. 

Примітка   Для роботи програми треба обновити встановлений при інсталяціїї  віндовс java   з https://java.com/pl/download/     Дане оновлення не містить вірусів провірео virustotal.com
jenja_pa (2017-11-22 16:18:12+00:00): Добре попробую
karitotp (2017-07-07 20:19:48+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. You added a building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505785515) over several existing buildings, may be you can tag it as landuse=comercial, also check again on the nodes that have only a name tag (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4956385064). 
Karito
FrançoiseR (2017-07-09 08:53:08+00:00): Bonjour, "landuse=commercia"l n'est pas non plus approprié dans ce secteur constitué essentiellement d'immeubles d'habitation, avec des commerces en rez-de-chaussée qu'il vaut mieux taguer individuellement. Je pense que "demain1123" a cherché à afficher le nom du Domaine Ventre sans voir que celui-ci est déjà présent sur le rues à l'intérieur de l’îlot (dont d'ailleurs le Domaine n'est qu'une partie). Le mieux est de supprimer  ce polygone. Quant au node qui n'a qu'un nom son tag principal  pourrait être "place=city_block" (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity_block)
Françoise (qui habite pas loin du domaine ventre)
FrançoiseR (2017-07-09 09:53:23+00:00): Rectificatif: j'ai regardé de plus près dans  JOSM, en fait vous avez voulu semble-il simplement indiquer des n° d'immeubles, mais le n°3 est déjà présent. (Du coup le tag place n'est pas forcement une bonne idée.) Si vous voulez créer le n°8 il faut vous inspirer de la syntaxe du n° 3 (regardez dans  Potlatch  plutôt que dans ID). Bienvenue dans la nébuleuse OSM, et courage ;-)
FR
pasharm (2017-09-21 20:45:10+00:00): Слово вулиця пишеться в кінці самої назви: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8#.D0.9F.D0.BE.D1.80.D1.8F.D0.B4.D0.BE.D0.BA_.D1.81.D0.BB.D1.96.D0.B2_.D1.83_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D1.85_.D0.B2.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B8.D1.86.D1.8C
Warin61 (2017-12-31 03:29:57+00:00): Hi,
Looks to be little left of this line (former Buninyong line). The associated stations too have disappeared. Should this be removed from OSM and put on OHM?
Warin61 (2018-01-03 22:56:10+00:00): I have now copied this railway line to OHM .. and it is there nicely.

Sections of this line I have tagged 'ruined:' other sections 'nonexistent:' and the southern platform/station abandoned:

I think that truly represents what is there. And, for those that want the history .. they can use OHM, where it is tagged railway= -no disused abandoned etc as it records what was there between the tagged start and end dates.
If some one changes it back .. I'll not be 'happy' :) I accuse them of 'tagging for the render'.
FredrikLindseth (2017-07-10 13:54:13+00:00): It looks like you are adding duplicate names to all POIs you are editing. They only have a name in one language, and then you are adding the same name in a name:en-tag. You might reconsider doing this as it not very useful information
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-07-08 00:59:49+00:00): vendo que os condutores a sair da 'Avenida 4 de Fevereiro' não devem inverter o sentido de marcha no local onde adicionaste esta via de ligação, consigo compreender porque não juntaste os nós das vias que se cruzem, no entanto, vias que se cruzem 'devem' estar conectados com um nó, mas claro, não è obrigatório mas se alguém perceber que não adicionaste, podem adicioná-lo, e neste caso particular, adicionando um nó a este cruzamento indicará aos condutores que pode-se efectuar um inversão de sentido de marcha neste cruzamento que é problemático porque é proibido

então, o que pode-se fazer é aplicar uma 'restrição' ao nó, faz-se apenas uma ligação entre os nós das duas vias > selecione o nó compartilhado entre os dois > e aplica-se uma "restrição" na secção 'todas as etiquetas' no menu do lado esquerdo, digite 'restriction' e na área de texto ao lado desse digite 'no_u_turn', espero que, uma vez que o sistema de navegação seja actualizado (o que pode demorar algum tempo), deve proibir inverções de marcha neste cruzamento

não preciso fazer isso, mas ajuda resolver algumas das convenções mais complexas

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Relation:restriction
aureozb (2017-07-10 08:47:19+00:00): Diógenes, muito obrigado pela sua ajuda, podes por favor confirmar se já está bem melhor agora?

Mais uma coisinha, como eliminar os nós de ligação a mais nas estradas ?
Nakaner (2017-07-07 11:52:19+00:00): Hi ralley,

I recently read about an address import from LINZ but not about an import of rivers. Could you please point me to the discussion of that import and its documentation on the OSM wiki?

The Import Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines) require you to use a dedicated account for bulk imports. Please be fair and play by the rules by creating an dedicated account and using that for the import (btw, one account per import and person). Please don't forget to add following informations to the profile page of that user: your user name (who is responsible, which import, link to wiki page of the import).

Best regards and happy importing

Michael
ralley (2017-07-08 03:58:36+00:00): Michael, LINZ importing is covered at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/LINZ.  There is nothing specific to river imports there though.  I was not aware of the need for a dedicated account for import, will try and clear that up with the people overseeing the LINZ import.
Cheers, Rob.
eggie (2017-07-07 12:28:34+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-07 12:34:53+00:00): Er is al op dit punt een supportcentre gemapt van de universiteit.
De naam van je aangebrachte edit is name=school. Dat is niet correct. amenity=school wordt gebruikt van BO t/m VO. Ik moet je bijdrage helaas verwijderen.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50104255

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
eggie (2017-07-07 12:37:12+00:00): reverted
DaveF (2017-07-07 11:48:59+00:00): Hi Cate91 Welcome to OSM.
I'm reverting a couple of your edits as you've removed a tag & overlaid a new highway instead of upgrading the existing way.

Is Cherry Banks fully open to Forgetmenot Way?
DaveF (2017-07-07 11:51:42+00:00): To check: Is the road you added actually called Cherry Banks as that is in another part of the development?
Cate91 (2017-07-07 12:23:16+00:00): No worries - I'm new to this! 

The road added/changed is called Cherry Banks (not another part of the development)

Cherry Banks splits where it meets Bluebell Way and continues south to meet the NE/SW Cherry Banks road and join to Willowherb (That part of the road is not on the map yet).

Valerian Street crosses through Bluebell Way and Cherry Banks, and will continue a bit further south/south-east, finishing with an anchor shape road. 

There is also another road called Sunflower Road which comes South from the 2nd Cherry Banks entrance on Jenner Boulevard which will meet Forgetmenot Way.

I believe there won't be a through-route from Forgetmenot Way to Willowherb Road so the East/West road isn't correct.

The double yellow lines consultation from South Gloucestershire Council has a great map on it which shows what I'm trying to explain a bit clearer. You can find it on -
 http://lydegreenonline.co.uk/maps (scroll down & it's the 3rd Map). This one is still missing chunks of the rest of the development though so not 100% accurate.

Thanks for your help :)
southglos (2017-07-07 13:11:59+00:00): Hi
...and 30mph?  I thought all of this development was within a 20mph zone?
Cate91 (2017-07-07 16:41:36+00:00): Not that I know of as I believe it's all 30mph, but if you know better, by all means, change it to 20mph :) It'll all become clearer once the council actually adopt the roads.
nebulon42 (2017-07-07 10:30:41+00:00): Einseitiges Rückgängigmachen von Änderungen anderer ohne Vorankündigung ist kein guter Stil. Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/996281 für eine Diskussion. Ich bin dafür diese Änderung wieder zurückzusetzen bzw. den Straßennamen im Ort Winklern komplett zu entfernen.
woodpeck_repair (2018-06-07 09:48:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59631074 where the changeset comment is: remove bad import
Chieftl (2017-07-07 12:25:58+00:00): Добрий день
Позначений вами заклад "Фортеця" трохи не дотягує до звання супермаркета :)
Тут краще підійде позначка "міні-маркет", тобто shop=convenience
Також за правилами не рекомендується вносити слово "супермаркет" до назви точки, просто "Фортеця".
pacoingles (2026-04-17 21:55:11+00:00): Bar La Perla ya no existe. It is not exists anymore.
DD1GJ (2017-07-07 12:06:51+00:00): Die Hydranten und die zugehörigen Schilder sind Bestandteil des öffentlichen Raums und wurden im Rahmen der Panoramafreiheit mittels GPS erfasst und eingetragen. Daher betrachtet die Community Ihre Löschungen als Vandalismus und wird die Daten wiederherstellen. Das Thema Hydranten wird bereits mit dem BDEW besprochen. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58758
azalizh (2019-10-20 16:52:28+00:00): w linii https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505816852
trawy to chyba z lupą trzeba by szukać. Stoją tam samochody cały czas, a nie trawnik.