piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trial (2023-07-18 11:10:29+00:00): Fixed or created? You added capacity= lower than capacity:disabled=
eggie (2021-01-20 19:25:34+00:00): Oke Top!

De overige stukjes met de oude naam heb ik ook hernoemd naar Zeehavenweg.
Lastig te zien met editor iD denk ik. 
Het tussenliggende stuk tussen Zeehavenweg en noordelijke stuk Graanweg heb ik de naam Graanweg gegeven conform de BGT en BAG adresnodes.
MVG
eggie
ndm (2021-01-21 00:23:09+00:00): I cnsider these edits to be vandalising the map and removing useful changes -- I have reverted it. You are removing islands and road flares that exist and have been carefully surveyed.
ndm (2021-01-21 00:25:52+00:00): Ok, if you have any reasonable excuse then please explain yourself.
Nathan_A_RF (2021-01-21 14:03:03+00:00): Firstly it is not up to you to consider what is right and wrong, that's determined by the wiki. If you look here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:island and here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland you will see that islands of the type I corrected should be mapped in the way I did; a node and tag on that node of an island. By removing my edits purely because of your selfishness and apparent NIMBY nature, I suggest you read the wiki and discuss features and edits on talk pages rather than spitefully remove edits that you do not like. This is my reply to all your reverts.
ndm (2021-01-21 14:32:30+00:00): The wiki is supposed to document best practice and de facto mapping styles - it’s obviously missing the idea of micro mapping islands and geometry. I think there’s probably a reasonable approach that will match both the macro and micro mapping styles - I’ll try that and see how it goes. I’ll also try to fix the routing issue that your edit has caused.

I’m sure the land use changes are fine.

Hit and run edits that don’t match local mapping styles don’t have local knowledge aren’t always helpful - local mappers have to be able to keep stuff up to date in the long term.
BCNorwich (2021-01-21 09:07:51+00:00): Hi, Is this rec' open to the public or private school grounds?
BCNorwich (2021-01-27 08:55:03+00:00): No response so I added access=private and an explanation note.
DUGA (2021-08-01 04:27:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897686155/history

That does not look like a bridge. Not sure where your local knowledge comes from.
Leo Slager (2021-01-21 00:27:11+00:00): Dag Simon,
Laat je door Streetcomplete niet verleiden om allerlei onzinnige tags op de kaart te zetten.
cycleway:both=no
noname=yes
maxweight:signed=no
zijn volkomen nutteloze toevoegingen.
Niemand die er iets mee doet.
Het biedt geen info waar een router iets mee zou kunnen doen.
Die brug stond gewoon goed getagd.
ik haal ze even weg.
ndm (2021-01-21 00:27:21+00:00): I cnsider these edits to be vandalising the map and removing useful changes. You are removing islands and road flares that exist and have been carefully surveyed.

if you have any reasonable excuse then please explain yourself.
BCNorwich (2021-01-21 08:47:08+00:00): Hi, the feature you tagged as man_made=silo is actually a slurry containment/settlement tank. There looks to be a silo nearer the road in the buildings.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-01-27 08:51:28+00:00): No response so I've corrected your mistakes by re-positioning the silo as best I can. Then adding the slurry tank.
chris66 (2025-09-04 20:24:01+00:00): Hi, die von Dir eingetragenen Bäume haben einen sehr kleinen Stammdurchmesser von < 1 cm.

(diameter ist der Stammdurchmesser in mm).

Ist eventuell der Kronendurchmesser gemeint? Dieser wird als diameter_crown erfasst.
Gorignak (2025-09-13 15:59:36+00:00): Hi, danke für den Hinweis, das ist mir überhaupt nicht aufgefallen. Es war tatsächlich der Kronendurchmesser in Metern gemeint. Soll ich das korrigieren oder warst du da schon dran?
chris66 (2025-09-13 16:49:14+00:00): Ich glaube ich habe die bereits korrigiert.

Grüße Chris :)
Multi-Level (2021-01-20 19:34:01+00:00): Hi Amy,
why got https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/304952381/history deleted?
amymack (2021-01-20 19:39:44+00:00): Hi Multi-Level, 
Sorry about that, I am having trouble with the JOSM conflict resolution tool and it made me delete it before saving my edits, but I'm trying to go back in and see what happened. Thanks for pointing that out! 
Amy
Multi-Level (2021-01-20 20:27:16+00:00): No problem, thanks for fixing it.
StephaneP (2021-03-17 09:28:30+00:00): Bonjour Antoine,

Autour du giratoire https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/542659969 tu avais modifié les "path" en "cycleway".
Je viens de faire la modif inverse car ces cheminements ne sont pas plus faits pour les cyclistes que pour les piétons. C'est partagé pour les 2 modes de déplacement.

A bientôt
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Robert Whittaker (2021-02-13 12:21:55+00:00): Hi there. Are you sure that KW17 2TY is the correct postcode for Howabreck https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897701399 ? Code-Point Open locates that postcode 20km away on Gairsay: https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/KW/KW17/2/#2TY
GartenStuhl (2021-02-19 05:40:19+00:00): Habs erst jetzt gesehen
Das neue Gebäude ist nicht sehr akkurat eingezeichnet.
Mehr Probleme dürfte aber die Zulässigkeit der Quelle für diese Änderung sein, ob der Grundbuchauszug hier in OSM verwendet werden darf, wage ich zu bezweifeln, eventuell weiss jemand mehr diesbezüglich?

In der Zwischenzeit habe ich das Gebäude anhand der Maxar-Luftbilder angepasst und etwas verschoben:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99564244

Viel Spass und Happy Mapping :)
PT-53 (2021-01-25 07:26:09+00:00): Hallo bigbug21,
diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897703005/history
hat (noch ?) keine Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
bigbug21 (2021-01-25 07:46:04+00:00): Danke, PT-53, ist korrigiert (und die riesige Parkplatzfläche Althengstett gleich mit...)
Mashin (2021-01-20 22:30:12+00:00): DarylHannah,
thanks for contributing. Few things that should be improved.

1) leisure=park is for regular parks not skateparks (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dskateboard)

2) Any reason for deleting streets in Philippines? They show up on satellite imagery.

3) The buildings you draw are very coarse. You can trace them better from imagery (Esri clarity or Maxar). Minimally please use square function by pressing Q.

4) Driveways are not tagged as unclassified, but with highway=service + service=driveway

5) When editing, please keep edits in one changeset geographically close. Your boundingBox is large and shows up as edits also in areas where you didn't make any changes.
NetWormKido (2021-02-18 12:55:38+00:00): Андрей, я откатил ваш пакет правок. Причина: массовое изменение статуса дорог без согласования с сообществом, удаление поля name. Если изменился индекс дороги (ref) его и изменяйте. При таких массовых правках, сначала обсудите их с сообществом на форуме.
blackboxlogic (2021-01-24 03:27:11+00:00): You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897707813 as part of the ramp to the highway. You put highway=service but I think highway=motorway_link would be much more appropriate. Also, I think this is one-way... Could you please improve it or let me know if you need help fixing it. Looking at the adjacent roads should hint at what it should be.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97858881
Glassman (2021-01-20 20:28:06+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and they all look good. Apartment building is great.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97859259
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-21 20:28:00+00:00): Proszę, używaj opisów zmian które coś opisują - z "poprawki" nic nie wynika
charl3s (2021-01-21 20:36:30+00:00): A jak powinny wyglądać poprawne opisy? Mogę prosić o jakiś link do wiki?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-21 20:52:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Komentarze_zestawu_zmian
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-21 20:53:34+00:00): Przy edytowaniu z iD warto wspomnieć czy to edycja na podstawie wizyty w terenie czy na podstawie zdjęć lotniczych
seattlefyi (2021-01-21 05:33:32+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edits! Your buildings all look pretty well drawn, I might suggest using the "squaring tool" right after you've drawn it and tagged it as a building. You can right click the building and select the button from the popup menu, or just press'q'. This makes all the corners 90 degrees (if already close). Thanks again!
blackboxlogic (2021-01-24 03:31:25+00:00): You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/897712671 as wetlands, but I think it might be more appropriate as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:basin%3Ddetention
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97859582
TomCerts (2021-01-21 19:13:44+00:00): Maxar Premium Imagery (2.61; -0.35), Strava for offset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97859654
Glassman (2021-01-23 03:05:12+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97859699
Wulf4096 (2021-02-22 09:48:51+00:00): Hallo! Wie kommst du darauf, dass Radfahren hier verboten sei? Wurde die Beschilderung seit letztem August verändert?
Wulf4096 (2021-02-22 10:20:55+00:00): Ich hab das in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99735750 mal wieder geradegezogen.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=53.53160678288288&lng=10.230704173873875&z=17&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&pKey=7-LYshIPGZDV4pJVHUbuqA&focus=photo

zeigt wo die Kraftfahrstraße endet.
Und von Süden kommend darf man mit dem Rad bis zu der Ausfahrt (links im Bild) fahren.
tomek11 (2021-02-23 19:51:09+00:00): Ok, vielleicht war ich etwas voreilig. Ein explizites Verbot gibt es dort nicht. Ob es Sinn macht mit dem Rad von Süden da lang zu fahren, ist eine andere Frage. Ich habe die Änderungen durchgeführt damit Fahrrad-Routing-Apps nicht in die Irre leiten. Es stellt aber sich die Frage, ob ein implizites Verbot herrscht, da der parallel verlaufende Weg mit Zeichen 240 ausgeschildert ist und somit wohl benutzungspflichtig für Radfahrer ist.
Wulf4096 (2021-02-23 21:04:17+00:00): Der Radweg führt in eine andere Richtung, ist also nicht straßenbegleitend. Eine Benutzungspflicht liegt somit nicht vor.

Dass manche Radfahrer da nicht langfahren mögen bzw. dass viele Autofahrer das auch nicht mögen, ist ne andere Sache. Die Beschilderung ist nunmal wie sie ist.

Da sind die Routing-Apps gefragt, für ihre User tolle Routen zu berechnen.
Ggfs. kann man mit (korrekten) Tags die Routingentscheidungen beeinflussen.
Glassman (2021-01-23 03:05:24+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97859962
user_11418917 (2021-01-24 19:21:43+00:00): Stop adding spams!
5m4u9 (2021-01-22 07:00:17+00:00): hola, en el mapa está información de baches es considerada temporal y que pronto no existirá. voy a revertir los cambios

pienso que debrías utilizar UMAP o geojson.io para situar estos problemas y llevar gestión
Glassman (2021-01-23 03:05:38+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97860159
!bm (2021-01-21 02:22:09+00:00): Hallo Marco,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM!

An way 762559574 sowie way 618016529 sind jeweils maxspeed:forward=* und ~:backward=* getaggt – da ergibt ein (v.a. höheres) maxspeed=* ziemlich wenig Sinn.

--besteGrüße!bm
Glassman (2021-01-23 03:06:43+00:00): Tip: Use the counties parcel viewer to get better boundaries for complexes. Edit looks good
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97860354
eggie (2021-01-20 21:07:49+00:00): Lijkt me oke zo..
Gr eggie
hauke-stieler (2021-01-23 18:35:32+00:00): Moin,

so wie ihr euer Büro eingetragen habt, wird euch das nicht viel nützen, da die angegebenen tags unvollständig sind. Keine Suchmaschine oder Karte würde euch damit korrekt darstellen. Außerdem war der "entrance=yes" tag, den ihr gelöscht habt, durchaus korrekt.
Hab das ganze mal korrigiert und einen separaten Knoten hinzugefügt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3695925821

Grüße
Hauke
user_5359 (2021-02-07 11:03:38+00:00): Hello! I correct you typo for the tag boundary=administra(t)ive (add the missing t). Please have a deeper look on the booth relation https://www.osm.org/relation/12215611 and https://www.osm.org/relation/12215798 (same area, but two different ways (JOSM says double way).
elevatingway (2021-01-26 16:12:15+00:00): looking good
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97860766
blackboxlogic (2021-01-24 03:38:52+00:00): I see you mixing other information into the name tag on many of your edits. The name tag is for holding the name and nothing else. You have added reference links in other fields which clearly show the name of the feature. Please stick to the name that you find in reference material without making any creative changes to it. Please respond to confirm that you have received this message. If you feel you have good reason for making your own custom adjustments to the information you find on a reference, let's discuss it. Please see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97860952
JRH50 (2021-01-26 21:19:44+00:00): You are correct, by the letter of OSM's naming convention, adding "Historical" is incorrect.  This is me being socially conscious.  I would hate for a person in distress to show up at this bed and breakfast looking for assistance. As the features are now, after your recent update, they look as if they are part of active life saving station instead of an inactive or historical station.  It is the same as putting "Retired" in parenthesis as a suffix to a retired military officer, For example Admiral John M. Richardson, USN (Retired). Anyone would know that ADM Richardson is no long on active duty.
blackboxlogic (2021-01-26 22:03:08+00:00): Thanks for responding. I see the reason for your naming conventions and it sure would be bad for someone to think this is a real, current feature. Since you were making many similar edits and I was unsure how to proceed, I asked in the US OSM Slack #harmful-edits channel yesterday (though, you're far from "harmful"). Several people responded suggesting that this content would be more appropriate on OHM (https://www.openhistoricalmap.org). OSM is a place for verifiable features about the current, real world.
I think there's room for many of the features/details you're adding in OSM and they are valuable to the community.
I'm trying to think of a compromise that would adhere to "the letter of OSM's naming convention" (which I feel has value to the community) and also achieves your goals. My first thought is the "old_name" tag, which would make the situation clear in a machine readable way. Others might have different/better suggestions?
blackboxlogic (2021-01-27 17:25:19+00:00): I'm glad you mentioned the bed and breakfast which is currently here. I found it at quoddyvacation.com
That page lists current names for these buildings (and pictures with signs) which conflict with the historic names.
North building "The Station House"
East building "The Cabin"
South building "The Camp"
West building "The Lodge"
It refers to the compound as "West Quoddy Station", which conveniently sidesteps any confusion about "lifesaving". How do you feel about historic names in [old_name] and current names in [name], for here and other similar situations?
JRH50 (2021-01-28 22:09:43+00:00): Yeah, I can work with that.  Thanks for the help.
NetWormKido (2021-02-18 03:57:47+00:00): Привет. На снимке Maxar premium отчетливо видно, что как минимум одно домохозяйство в этом нп проживает. Я изменил тип нп на изолейтед. Если у тебя есть информация, что снимок неактуален или есть информация с "земли" - дай мне знать я исправлю обратно.
GeorgeHoneywood (2021-01-24 22:24:49+00:00): Nice job :) I couldn't quite summon the effort to do the whole thing when I saw this before ~
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97861302
JulesGabrielVerne (2021-01-26 08:31:24+00:00): Cześć, jesteś pewny tej lokalizacji?
grelus (2021-01-26 10:04:23+00:00): Tak, to z terenu. Oczywiście może być błąd związany z  dokładnością GPS.
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2021-03-29 06:17:41+00:00): If you find funny defacing a map used also by NGOs and the Blue Hats, I suggest you to play with something different
sovereign_ch (2021-01-21 04:30:07+00:00): Die Feststellung dürfte inhaltlich zwar stimmen, allerdings darfst du den building-tag nicht einfach entfernen. Im Minimum 'yes', besser 'residential', bei einzeln gezeichneten Reihen-EFH idealerweise 'house'. Ist korrigiert und sollte bald wieder auftauchen...
mytabaluga (2021-01-21 06:18:56+00:00): Danke, so geht es es natürlich auch.
https://sunders.uber.space/?lat=52.42581713&lon=13.33397985&zoom=18
bobeeeze (2023-11-05 00:34:12+00:00): Buenos días, el nombre que has puesto para la senda (Senda de las balsas/ceja) es muy raro. Quizás querías poner como nombre alternativo Senda de la Ceja? Para eso tienes la etiqueta alt_name [1].
Podrías precisar tu fuente?
Gracias y buen mapeo

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:alt_name
krassechanges (2022-11-16 07:15:28+00:00): Wegen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24495181 : 

Ich habe hier Probleme mit dem Routing:
https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd-iOS/issues/2312
Ist das nicht ein highway=service ?
eggie (2021-01-21 06:40:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Feedback.. Bedankt voor uw bijdrage.. De camping is echter al vermeld op het gebouw. Uw bijdrage heb ik weer  verwijderd.

MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
Hooijmannetje (2021-01-21 18:35:27+00:00): Dank voor de mail en uitleg. Wel vreemd dat ik in de app deze camping niet zie. Vandaar de gedachte om deze toe te voegen. Enig idee waarom ik de camping niet te zien krijg in de app, itt de kaart in de browser? Groet Joost
eggie (2021-01-21 18:56:14+00:00): Dag Hooijmannetje..
Dat kwam omdat de vermelding op de gebouwomtrek stond. Kennelijk heeft maps.me daar moeite mee. Ik zie het vaker.
De vermeldong heb ik nu verplaatst naar de adresnode waar die eigenlijk hoort.
Maps.me is wat beperkt.
Tags op het vlak van een campingterrein zie je ook niet.

Bedankt voor je reactie
Eggie
bobeeeze (2023-11-05 00:24:09+00:00): Buenos días, el nombre que has puesto para este camino es muy raro. Quizás querías poner como nombre alternativo Senda del Italiano? Podrías precisar tu fuente?
Gracias y buen mapeo
danieldegroot2 (2021-01-20 22:23:03+00:00): This changeset adds the following ways to their respective reef relation:
305561799
305561806
305561813
305561822
809655264
823572973
823572974
Glassman (2021-01-23 03:12:42+00:00): Tip: highway=footway is like a sidewalk, often paved. A highway=path is more like a trail, rarely paved.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97863564
bdgroves (2021-01-23 03:51:46+00:00): I’ll clean it up a bit.  Thanks for the review, much appreciated.
Glassman (2021-01-23 03:09:01+00:00): Tip: your changeset comment should briefly indicate what you did. In this case - removed bridge
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97863811
bdgroves (2021-01-23 05:50:06+00:00): Thanks!  There actually is a bridge there.  I plan to clean it up very soon.  Plus add the other trails, it’s a very new park.  Thanks for the review ... always learning.
TomCerts (2021-01-21 19:13:37+00:00): Maxar Premium Imagery (2.61; -0.35), Strava for offset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97863869
Glassman (2021-01-23 03:11:25+00:00): Tip: Connect your trail to a road to allow routers to use both the highway and the trail to take you to your destination.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97863918
bdgroves (2021-01-23 03:53:01+00:00): I’ll clean it up a bit.  Was t sure about the exact start location.  I’ll revisit.  Thanks for the review.
ottwiz (2021-01-20 23:10:34+00:00): For some of the creeks I used Stamen Terrain for drawing the path for them
wireguy (2021-01-21 14:01:30+00:00): Hi JriSv...   Nice details, but saw some items.  Changing the entry road off rt33 broke the turn restriction relation.  Also, should the driveways connect to the buildings?  josm gives warning.  This also says not to: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/35795/map-buildings-connecting-the-road-or-not
abakus_uploader (2021-01-21 23:30:45+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
TomCerts (2021-01-21 19:13:29+00:00): Maxar Premium Imagery (2.61; -0.35), Strava for offset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97864495
StefanHRT (2021-01-21 02:12:52+00:00): Wieso setzt Du hier ein Access, welches so nicht stimmt? Dort ist doch gar keine Möglichkeit, mit Autos entlang zu fahren laut Mapillarybildern (die auch noch aus diesem Jahr von dem Nutzer cyton stammen). Gruß
StefanHRT (2021-01-21 06:35:50+00:00): Access angepasst ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97879404
a_d_s (2021-01-21 15:54:31+00:00): Das war in der Tat ein Fehler. Eigentlich wollte ich nur die Straße aktualisieren. Der Weg dort ist nicht für Autos nutzbar.
Danke fürs Aktualisieren.
StefanHRT (2021-01-21 17:25:19+00:00): Kein Problem ;) Mal eine andere Frage, da Du ja dort scheinbar aus der Gegend kommst. Ist der Bürgerpark eine geschützte Grünanlage? Falls ja, gibt es dort ausgewiesene Radwege? Gleiche Frage für den Ludwig-Lesser-Park
a_d_s (2021-01-21 20:47:00+00:00): Der Bürgerpark in Glienicke/N. ist keine geschützte Grünanlage, einfach nur ein Stück Grün.

Der genaue Status des Ludwig-Lesser-Park ist mir leider nicht bekannt. Der gehört zu Berlin.
StefanHRT (2021-01-21 21:01:41+00:00): OK, hätte ja sein können, das Du den Park im Berliner Teil auch kennst, ist ja nicht weit weg von Dir. Dennoch danke für die Rückmeldung
zuicz (2021-01-24 15:57:24+00:00): Droga serwisowa to nazwa opisowa, zawarta w tagu highway=service
To tak jakbyś narysował building=yes i dodał nazwę budynek, albo landuse=forest z nazwą las
No chyba że urząd nadał taką nazwę tym drogą, to co innego
Glassman (2021-01-23 03:13:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97864774
cpmapguy (2021-01-23 07:24:14+00:00): Thank you!
Glassman (2021-01-23 03:13:49+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97864819
cpmapguy (2021-01-23 07:24:00+00:00): Thank you!
Glassman (2021-01-23 03:14:01+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97864899