piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Colin Smale (2020-10-20 21:56:11+00:00): Hi Dave, this is one of the dangers of people linking admin boundaries to other types of way. In this case it's a "centre line" of a waterway. The boundary is where it is, and the new data I added is far closer to being definitive than the old NPE-based data it replaced. The boundary hasn't moved, but the representation has been improved. On the other hand, what does the exact location of the line down the "middle" of a waterway actually represent? Who knows. Half the time it is simply drawn in by hand using imagery and located roughly between the two banks. I take your point about the way history (although the waterway relations can help to reconstruct older situations) but I can't see a better way to do it. Keeping the way ID and moving all the nodes?
literan (2020-10-21 21:26:20+00:00): родовые названия улиц (улица, проспект, переулок, проезд, проектируемый проезд) по вики положено писать с малой буквы
omgitsgela (2020-10-23 05:05:27+00:00): Hi lasdjflkdsfjf, thanks for editing with OSM!

As you requested, I have reviewed the edits that you made in this changeset. Unfortunately, it appears that there's a few problems with this change which I'd like to talk about.

Firstly, you provided a proper name to your barbed wire fence as "Provate property boundary". This is misspelled, but more importantly, the name of objects on OSM reflects the naming as it appears in the real world. I cannot confirm or deny whether there is actually a barbed wire fence surrounding your property around its entirety, however I'm quite certain the official, proper name of your fence is not "Provate property boundary." As such, I've deleted the name tag on the fence.

While this is private property, there are several roads on this site which are visible from satellite, and do exist. Imagine a scenario where a firefighter had to drive to the end to work an emergency. Access to maps is vital for this kind of information. Instead of deleting paths marked on private property, it's a better move to instead use access=private to prevent navigation clients from routing traffic into the area.

I will make the changes necessary to bring this into compliance with OSM's policies. Thank you for your contribution.
Jrachi (2021-05-19 08:29:49+00:00): Ciao.
Mi spieghi il significato del "Gruppo Charbonnel" che hai inventato su un confine arbitrario?
Inoltre ti segnale che boundary si usa su confini amministrativi e non su suddivisioni geologiche.
Ti chiedo gentilmente infine su quali fonti ti sei ispirato per creare questa invenzione.
Ivo
Ivo
MitjaJez (2021-05-21 20:52:16+00:00): > Mi spieghi il significato del "Gruppo Charbonnel" che hai inventato su un confine arbitrario?
Območje "Gruppo Charbonnel" je že bilo predhodno ustvarjeno.

> Inoltre ti segnale che boundary si usa su confini amministrativi e non su suddivisioni geologiche.
To ni čisto res.

> Ti chiedo gentilmente infine su quali fonti ti sei ispirato per creare questa invenzione.
Zgodovino relacije "Gruppo del Charbonnel" si lahko ogledate na https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7467988/history in vabljeni, da dodate vire po potrebi.
Jrachi (2021-05-21 21:08:01+00:00): Niste odgovorili na nobeno moje vprašanje.
Predvsem povezava do zgodovine ne odgovarja na vprašanje: od kod hudiča ste dobili podatke za izgradnjo (geološke) regije?
MitjaJez (2021-05-21 21:37:37+00:00): > Niste odgovorili na nobeno moje vprašanje.
Predvsem povezava do zgodovine ne odgovarja na vprašanje: od kod hudiča ste dobili podatke za izgradnjo (geološke) regije?
I'm sorry, my italian is not good enought to replay using 'Lei'.
You had claim that I create "Gruppo del Charbonnel" which is not true and this can be seen in relation history.
I did not get data and I did not create this. Please write to author of this or suggest/make changes with sources. I cannot help you here. Clear now?
opencarpatia (2020-11-25 00:04:35+00:00): Привіт, потрібна ваша допомога. Хочу зрозуміти що це були за зміни? Чому відрізок дороги довжиною близько 500 метрів було позначено як "міст"? Якщо ви таким чином "виправляли" попередженння - прошу їх відкотити. Більшість струмків, перетин дороги з якими ви намагались виправити насправді не існує - гляньте на супутникову карту.

Також є не припустимим "виправляти" помилки через маркування відрізку асфальтової дороги як брід або тунель! Там ніколи не було ні броду ні тунелю ні струмка - я знаю це точно бо буваю там проїздом по кілька разів на місяць.

Деякі з помилок виправив самостійно, але маю сумнів що всі.
eggie (2020-10-20 20:47:41+00:00): Dag twijland.. haal je dan construction	=residential ook nog even weg?

MVG,
Eggie
PLima785 (2020-10-23 08:34:57+00:00): Bom dia,
Reparei na sua edição e obrigado por contribuir para a base de dados do Openstreetmap.
No entanto a mudança de jardim para parque é suspeita de ser uma edição pokego, para confirmar pode me dizer se tem alguma placa a confirmar o nome, caminhos pelo meio e árvores?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:leisure%3Dpark
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Tag:leisure%3Dgarden
https://t.me/OSMPortugal

Cumprimentos,
Pedro Lima
rseifried (2020-10-20 20:02:56+00:00): Forgot to add these hastags: #NEURISA2020 #session1
eggie (2020-10-20 21:01:47+00:00): Tja  .. dat wordt nog wat daar.
HG eggie
keebguy (2020-10-20 20:25:09+00:00): Clarification: Maxar Premium Imagery(4.9,4.5), Strava,  DigitalGlobe 2020-09-04
abakus_uploader (2020-10-20 22:45:34+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Nakaner (2020-12-28 19:02:04+00:00): Hallo greenie11,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz in Aura im Ulstertal name=Aura an alle Straßen getaggt (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154328602/history). Zudem hast du eine Adresse mit addr:street=* getaggt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/771093714/history). Siehe hierzu auch das grafische Diff deines Änderungssatzes unter https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92789525

Ich habe das gerade rückgängig gemacht. Ich bin am 6. September 2020 mit dem Rad durch Aura gefahren und finde auf meinen Fotos, die ich mit einer Actioncam am Fahrradlenker gemacht habe, keine Straßennamenschilder.

Für Ortschaften, bei denen der Ortsname bei Postanschriften als Ersatzstraßenname dient, nutzt man addr:place=Ortsname an den Hausnummernobjekten und kein name=Ortsname an den Straßen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Marych_ (2020-10-21 04:38:25+00:00): Dear ennui3000,
Could you please explain, why you remove "SEX Pichoniy" from name?
Building located in Uzbekistan
In Uzbek language its means Workshop

https://www.google.com/search?q=%D0%A6%D0%B5%D1%85+%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8+%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE+%D0%A3%D0%B7%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD&tbm=isch&ved=2ahUKEwjXieai7sTsAhXT6CoKHYfbD2QQ2-cCegQIABAA&oq=%D0%A6%D0%B5%D1%85+%D0%B2%D1%8B%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8+%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE+%D0%A3%D0%B7%D0%B1%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%B8%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D0%BD&gs_lcp=CgNpbWcQA1C3twJYrccCYLrKAmgAcAB4AIABYYgB1wWSAQE4mAEAoAEBqgELZ3dzLXdpei1pbWfAAQE&sclient=img&ei=0bqPX5fdB9PRqwGHt7-gBg&bih=969&biw=1920
ennui3000 (2020-10-21 09:15:50+00:00): Sorry, i reverted the change. Thank you for providing this information.
eggie (2020-10-20 21:29:19+00:00): Dag twijland.. net je ingetekend, maar alle gebouwen worden periodiek geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG (Kadaster).
Je kunt dat versnellen middels een verzoek op het forum van OSM in het draadje Verzoek BAG import.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Je hebt anders kans dat er straks bij update twee garages op elkaar liggen.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-20 21:35:42+00:00): Even als voorbeeld hoe zo iets gaat aangevraagd
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=805760#p805760

gr eggie
twijland (2020-10-20 21:39:06+00:00): Bedankt voor de tips, ik zal het voortaan op deze manier doen!
eggie (2020-10-20 21:46:10+00:00): Je kunt je garage gewoon laten staan. De duplikaat wordt wel  door de BAG importeur verwijderd.
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
mdelatorre (2020-10-21 19:00:35+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92790557
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
DressyPear4 (2020-10-20 21:53:54+00:00): Olá, os córregos são providos de importação? A geometria deles está bem ruim, e não devem ser conectados com vias, divida a linha antes e depois e faça como nesse exemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833676350
Outro detalhe é que não é correto adicionar uma área genérica como "landuse=residential".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92791102
Vitória223 (2020-10-23 12:49:20+00:00): Obrigada pelos comentários, irei revisar as informações adicionadas e alterar o que for necessário.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92791102
Lokai (2020-10-21 08:52:28+00:00): Hallo,

bei der Gebäudegeometrie ist dir wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen.
Gruß W.
omgitsgela (2020-10-23 05:39:43+00:00): Hi jradcliffe13, thanks for mapping with OSM!

It seems as if you have deleted all the address data from several houses in this area. Why did you do that? In OSM, we want to improve our map, and by deleting the address data out, it damages the map.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92791734
jradcliffe13 (2020-10-23 10:34:58+00:00): Hi there,
I am brand new to OpenStreetMap  and was tasked with adding any missing buildings that I found. I believe that when I was merging the new polygons to the existing structures the address data must have been deleted. I did not purposefully remove any type of data and did not intend to damage the map.
ToniE (2020-10-21 06:54:38+00:00): Hi Kelepom,

this *is* actually a oneway part.

I know this area quite well, and threr are signs:

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildtafel_der_Verkehrszeichen_in_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland_seit_2017#/media/Datei:Zeichen_222_-_Vorgeschriebene_Vorbeifahrt,_Rechts_vorbei,_StVO_2017.svg

Would you please revert your edit?

Br
Toni
ToniE (2020-10-21 07:02:48+00:00): Sorry for the noise, I did not see "junction = roundabout"

Br
Toni
Karljohan (2020-10-24 19:11:29+00:00): Jah, 2017-2019 asus hoones TÜ majandusteaduskond, kuid 2020 aasta sügisest kolis sinna TÜ maailma keelte ja kultuuride kolledž: https://www.facebook.com/maailmakeeled/posts/2389692934660965
aachso (2020-10-22 18:11:23+00:00): Hallo,

ab der Adenauerallee steht derzeit – anders als in dem Video – gar kein Schild. Vermutlich weil das für einen Radweg (erst recht mit Gegenverkehr) viel zu schmal ist. Damit ist das jedenfalls kein benutzungspflichtiger Radweg und deshalb hatte ich das auch als bicycle=yes + segregated=yes eingetragen. Erst hinter der Einfahrt von Menten steht ein Zeichen 241-30.

Soweit ich weiß gibt es aktuell leider keinen Standard in OSM, der die Benutzungspflicht von Radwegen akkurat beschreibt. Meiner Erfahrung nach wird aber bicycle=designated meist als benutzungspflichtiger Radweg interpretiert und bicycle=yes für alles, wo man mit dem Rad fahren darf, aber nicht muss. Im Wiki stehen dazu widersprüchliche Angaben.

Ich persönlich würde hier bicycle=yes bevorzugen. Wie siehst du das?
Head (2020-10-22 21:42:29+00:00): Schwieriges Thema. bicycle=yes nutzen wir ja für Gehweg, Fahrrad frei, wo Schrittgeschwindigkeit gilt. Auf diesem Stück gilt aber keine Schrittgeschwindigkeit, außer es steigen gerade Leute aus dem Bus ein und aus. 

Ich verwende i.d.R. die Wikiseite DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren als Referenz. Dort wird bicycle=designated auch für nicht benutzungspflichtige Radwege vorgeschlagen.

Was hälst du hiervon?
bicycle=designated
traffic_sign:forward=none
traffic_sign:backward=DE:1022-10
aachso (2020-10-23 18:24:16+00:00): Ja, das ist wohl die beste Möglichkeit. Ich habe den größten Teil des Radwegs mal in beide Richtungen abgefilmt und werde die Tags dann an die Beschilderung anpassen.

Dann passe ich diesen Abschnitt entsprechend deinem Vorschlag an. Der Radweg ist glaube ich überall in Gegenrichtung freigegeben, das werde ich nochmal genau prüfen.
Head (2020-10-23 18:57:14+00:00): Von Kornelimünster Steinkaulplatz bis zum Außenring darf der linksseitige Radweg stadteinwärts befahren werden, bis auf das Stück zwischen Marktplatz und Ringstraße.

Wenn ich mich richtig erinnere, ist er linksseitig benutzungspflichtig bis zur Ringstraße und außerdem von der östlichen A44-Abfahrt bis zur Neuhausstraße.
Head (2020-10-23 19:00:26+00:00): Korrektur: linksseitig benutzungspflichtig nicht ab Steinkaulplatz:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.73289424511205&lng=6.175240882405774&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=yuFhHtKYxPvNkzkuCdt0vw&x=0.4909257092845961&y=0.5413940506453576&zoom=0

benutzungspflichtig erst ab Hausnr. 70:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=50.73289424511205&lng=6.175240882405774&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=yuFhHtKYxPvNkzkuCdt0vw&x=0.4909257092845961&y=0.5413940506453576&zoom=0
Jonathan Haas (2020-10-26 14:09:10+00:00): Hier steht auch noch einiges zum Kartieren von Benutzungspflicht: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:bicycle=use%20sidepath?uselang=de
ottwiz (2020-10-20 22:03:54+00:00): Also aligned pipes (that's why the changeset spans a bit into Pennsylvania) and also added power towers
Karthoo (2020-10-25 20:20:23+00:00): Hallo, habe gerade gesehen, dass du auch fleißig am kartieren der SWV-Wegweiser bist (sogar wie ich, indem du sie auf Commons hochlädst!). Wollte dir nur für deine Ergänzungen danken, weiter so! 😉
machapuchare (2020-10-25 20:58:00+00:00): Hallo! Danke! – Ja, ich habe deine Knotenpunktsystem-Ergänzungen im Renchtal gesehen und bin deshalb zuletzt auch zur Erfassung der Wanderweg-Routenrelation nur von Wegweiser zu Wegweiser übergegangen – um es vlt später einfach in ein solches überführen zu können. Die Knotenpunktcharakteristik ist ja da, auch wenns nicht explizit so beschildert ist. Die Bilder auf Commons hab ich mir da auch bei dir abgeschaut, sie können (selbst wenn sie unvollständig sind weil ich dann doch nicht immer fotografiere...) wirklich nützlich sein um das System zu dokumentieren und nachzuvollziehen.
eggie (2020-10-21 06:14:58+00:00): Dag hans,

De winkel heb ik even gecombineerd met de adresnode nr 21
MVG,
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2020-10-21 07:17:19+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre message, nous avons corrigé ce problème.
Effectivement, c'est une erreur dû à un oubli de l'enseigne de nous avoir signalé une mauvaise information. 
Pourquoi n'avez vous pas supprimé le node ? N'aurez pas été plus simple d'en recréer un ? Cette procédure aurait pu inviter que l'enseigne modifie un noeud qui n'aurait pas lieu d'être.

Cordialement
gileri (2020-10-21 16:45:52+00:00): Bonjour,

Sur cette question il y a en effet deux écoles : garder ou supprimer l'objet OSM.

Le garder permet de conserver l'historique, vu que le fond de commerce a été vendu et transformé plutôt que détruit et reconstruit.

Le supprimer/recréer facilite l'intégration avec des outils externes qui se reposent uniquement sur l'identifiant OSM.

Je penche clairement pour la première méthode.

Dans votre cas il me semble facile d'implémenter une vérification des autres champs (name brand, brand:wikidata, wikidata etc.), et alerter en cas de non-concordance lors d'une modification d'attribut.
gileri (2020-10-21 16:46:28+00:00): Il y a aussi des discussions autour des identifiants permanents sur OSM, qui adresseraient ce problème : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Permanent_ID
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2020-10-22 06:38:00+00:00): Bonjour,

Merci pour votre retour, nous allons étudier cela avec attention.

Cordialement
Jakob48 (2020-10-27 20:22:49+00:00): Hallo EinEngener,

beim Wegekreuz (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5128982212) ist der Bilderlink kaputt. Dort steht nur eine Fehlermeldung.

Gruß
Jakob48
Zhytomyr (2021-12-20 17:44:25+00:00): Hi Jessica,

you've (re-)added many already demolished buildings by using the outdated Bing imagery.
-Wiley- (2020-10-20 23:20:18+00:00): Zoomed in view reference correct street name. When zoomed out, the name reverts to incorrect name. Can anyone help?
aceman444 (2020-10-25 23:41:04+00:00): Hi, as I said, stop with the crossing=marked tags immediately. In the case here, not that it is just duplicate to crossing=uncontrolled, but it is plain wrong. You added it to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/189739844, however that crossing has a traffic light as seen on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2003329699 . So your tagging is conflicting with the existing data. Also please do not add any crossing=* tags on way, as the needed tags are already on the shared nodes where the road and footways intersect.
jurajik82 (2020-10-27 00:19:09+00:00): Sorry for that.
Actually I wanted to separate lane from Lamac to Dubravka to cross that crossing so that topology would be correct. But I estimated that I coudn't do that without deleting and recreating somehing so I resigned. And with all your information you gave me already this would create 3 separate crossroads without synchronized traffic lights etc.
Anyway. How would you map speed bump before that crosswalk if there is one?
Also for pedestrians there is probably no additional penalty in Osmand when crossing crosswalk without traffic lights. This is somehow not mapped in such simplified crossroads.
aceman444 (2020-10-29 14:25:00+00:00): I can do that crossing more precisely if you want:) But where is there a speed bump?
3 separate crossroads are fine, if they are not on the same route. Car going into any direction will only cross one pedestrian crossing, if done correcly. Traffic lights for pedestrians get much higher penalty in OsmAnd than a crossing without lights, which is correct. Anyway, if there are lights, you have to map them, not think about any particular app (like OsmAnd), whether it cares about it or not. Some other app might. So always tag what is correct and on the site.
aceman444 (2020-10-29 14:46:18+00:00): Here is the new junction: https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=93242025 . Yes, if one wants to detail it this precisely, then you need to split many segments to write correct lanes and turn lanes. And even update bus lines (relations) that went over the old roads. The iD editor isn't very good at dealing with relations and even actively destroys bus relations when the user touches one.
jurajik82 (2020-10-29 20:14:47+00:00): There's no speed bump. I meant possibility if there was one then there would be no road to put it on. Anyway thank you for editing crossroad. Just tell me how long it took for you. I would spend at least 1 hour to do this (and generally it takes too long for any edit).
porfiriopaiz (2020-10-22 01:53:58+00:00): Te solicito nuevamente, que no edites los nombres de las paradas y que te plantees otra forma de contribuir con OSM, estamos trabajando en mejorar estos datos y con tus cambios nos representan trabajo extra.

Por favor, no edites los datos de transposte público en Nicaragua, hay muchas otras formas de contribuir.

Saludos.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:30:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
seattlefyi (2020-10-21 00:48:14+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OSM! Thanks for replacing the old houses with the new ones - it's really helpful. Your changes look pretty good, though I have a couple of suggestions: First, after drawing the building, tag it as a house (like you've already done), but then press the 'q' hotkey to make all the corners 90 degrees (if they should be). There is also a right-mouse-click option for that if you prefer. Also, the address looks great, but when adding the state, I'd capitalize the 'WA'. Thanks again, hope to see more!
Glassman (2020-10-21 03:34:45+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92793978
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
aceman444 (2020-11-14 04:34:58+00:00): Tato zmena je super, dakujem. Thanks!
Glassman (2020-10-21 03:36:44+00:00): Thanks for updating your business info. Hopefully since Facebook uses OSM, it will appear there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92794146
Glassman (2020-10-21 03:34:14+00:00): Tip: square houses by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92794194
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-12-16 05:29:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 95910870, 95913025, 95906623, 95909376, 95904727 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some schoolkid 'comedy' editingin Durham.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4261 for more details.
Cascafico (2020-10-21 07:00:34+00:00): sui marciapiedi a 50kmh? :-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92794474
Antonio Giacomini (2020-10-21 07:50:55+00:00): Orco, ho sbagliato ahahahahah, appena ho un attimo di tempo libero aggiusto, grazie dell'avviso
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92794474
blackboxlogic (2020-10-21 01:49:45+00:00): We expand the whole name in OSM. "Highpointe Cir" should be "Highpointe Circle", "Kitree Ln" should be "Kitree Lane". I've fixed them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92794514
literan (2020-10-21 21:19:55+00:00): инф отправлена в МВД