piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner (2016-10-20 15:26:32+00:00): @LogicalViolinist I did not looked at all your edits of the last 18 months. I just asked myself: "Well Gatineau has all addresses on the map. What's the source of them?" And the answer was: "It's changeset 33248922 from LogicalViolinist."

I do have a job at Geofabrik. But as you told me this week, you should not use Google Translator. :-) (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33248922 for reference) The English version is just half down the page:

"I am Michael Reichert, a master student of geodesy and geoinformation at Karlsruhe Institute of Technologie and OSM contributor since August 2011 (some prior edits with the account CdE). I have a side job at Geofabrik."
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-20 15:37:01+00:00): I did say roughly. I did not use google translate. Mein Deutsch ist nicht so gut. Side job still qualifies as a job. It means you probably know woodpeck personally in real life (judging that geofabrik is not that big of a company)
ottawa_data (2016-10-20 15:48:38+00:00): I do agree that @Nakaner has been actively looking for reasons to revert commits from OSM community members in Canada. Thanks to these reverts, we now have a blank map again.
SOSM (2016-10-20 17:34:21+00:00): @mikelmaron the complaints about the import originate with local mappers that found that their data was needlessly being deleted/replaced without any substantial previous discussion. As nakaner has pointed out, the people involved were very well aware of what the guidelines say from previous discussion, further they have directly tried to sabotage DWG trying to clean up after them with numerous sock puppets and trolls of which ottawa_data just seems to be another one (as everybody can  see there is obviously not a blank slate in Ottawa). As has become clearer as the story has unfolded, it is clear that  Statistics Canada was/is trying to do the right thing, and in this discussion they were just being quoted to try and justify the blatant ignoring ot the guidelines that has taken place.
SimonPoole (2016-10-20 17:37:58+00:00): Upps, the previous comment was from me, and is obviously not an opinion of SOSM.
Josef K (2016-12-21 21:41:35+00:00): Apaguei a linha 447549847, zona deixou de ser industrial há muito tempo.
A Chorine Landcover que tem sido a fonte para estas zonas industriais etc., parece desactualizada. Seria bom talvez verificar melhor a sua info antes de acrescentá-la.
Reino Baptista (2016-12-22 09:20:44+00:00): Obrigado Josef K.

Nada bate o conhecimento local.
Os dados que utilizei são a última versão disponível, dezembro de 2013, apesar do dataset se designar por "Corinne Lancover 06"
Commodoortje (2016-10-14 16:16:19+00:00): Uw poi/note is voor de hele wereld zichtbaar. Bedenk dat OSM niet bedoeld is voor persoonlijke notes/poi's.
De door u aangebrachte naamsvermelding zal dan verwijderd worden.
indigomc (2016-10-14 18:07:09+00:00): In this changeset you removed a hospital building that had been marked out in detail and replaced it later with a single point. This is unacceptable; you could have made changes to the tags for the original. I have reverted it. Please check for such again, and do not leave a note that says something other than the actual action. Thanks.
indigomc (2016-10-15 08:00:43+00:00): You dragged a road junction and attached it to an unrelated road across a large area here. Please be careful.
ToeBee (2016-10-14 05:49:06+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. What exactly were you trying to do in this changeset? You deleted several things that I'm not sure should be deleted. Please keep in mind that what you change on osm.org goes into a shared map that the whole world sees. You are also participating in a community. As such, please supply a useful comment with your edits to communicate with the rest of the OSM community. Thanks!
chnav (2016-10-14 13:20:02+00:00): Hi, please explain why you have deleted power towers and the draw it again. This is not a good practice in OSM to delete anything unless it is missing on ground. If you do not like position or tags then you _should adjust_ position or tags.

Regards
chnav
bewithsahilsaif (2016-10-14 16:07:44+00:00): "><img src=x onerror=prompt(21112);>
bewithsahilsaif (2016-10-14 16:08:47+00:00): cvcv
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-14 16:32:19+00:00): Uh?
SomeoneElse (2016-10-15 21:56:34+00:00): @LogicalViolinist - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1063 .
LogicalViolinist (2016-10-15 22:16:41+00:00): Thanks, I reported it.
ChehrehBargi (2020-01-02 13:44:06+00:00): باسلام
تعدادی از گره‌های که برای انتهای کوچه‌ها در نظر گرفته‌اید اشتباه هستند. دایره گردش طبق تعریف ویکی داده، برای میادین کوچک و نیز برای انتهای خیابان هایی که محیطی دایره شکل برای دور زدن وجود دارد، به کار می‌رود.
SomeoneElse (2016-10-14 09:02:31+00:00): Whilst MAPS.ME edits by new users can be annoying, in this case it was the user's first ever OSM edit, and likely the first time that they'd used MAPS.ME, which has _really_ confusing mixture of bookmarks, notes and feature change options.
Given that it's a new user, rather than "Again some bullshit change from
vandalism mapsme-account" a more appropriate comment might have said something like "Hello and welcome ... you probably haven't realised it, but you're updating a map that everyone can see!"
Cheers,
Andy
BeKri (2016-10-14 15:03:56+00:00): Hi Andy,
I somehow waited for a comment like your's
and somehow you are right, BUT ...
I former time I tried it your way,
I NEVER got a response.
Meanwhile it is my opinion that about 90% of 
Mapsme-Content are what I would call vandalism.
Or can you tell me what name:en=jot
has to do in a department_store ?
I think I can serperat between beginner's mistakes
and the "content" of Mapsme-CS.
For sure you can have a look at my CS
and tell me where I am wrong.
By the way have a look at CS
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42837451
same problem und good comment from militrik.
As you are in the DWG I think these problems are not new to you.
We all will have "great fun" and wast of time to
get useless content of Mapsme out of OSM.
Kind regards BeKri
SomeoneElse (2016-10-14 15:14:13+00:00): Yes, and I sometimes have the same reaction myself: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42394849 :)
Just checking - are you aware of http://mmwatch.osmz.ru/ that allows you to revert stuff immediately?
BeKri (2016-10-14 15:46:49+00:00): Hi, 
yes but IMHO this data is double
but content looks ok,
have a look at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4146347406/history
I don't think huawei "changed business"
that's what annoys me ..
The Hp I didn't know, interesting what we need to keep data good ... Thanks.
BCNorwich (2016-10-14 05:39:52+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I'd just like to point out that your addition to the database (highway named Hudson Way) is not joined to the existing highway network. If you know it is joined to the network then it would be good for you to map it as such. The road immediately north is a service road so would need upgrading to its current status. 

There's a beginners guide under the HELP button above and tons of OSM mapping info on the web. I'm just an ordinary mapper but if I can help please just ask.
Regards
indigomc (2016-10-15 07:48:35+00:00): You deleted a 'highway=tertiary' tag. Why?
scai (2016-10-14 16:16:53+00:00): source=http://www.bvwp-projekte.de/strasse/? Hast du deren Erlaubnis bekommen?
ohligser (2016-10-17 13:25:42+00:00): Hallo scai, vielen Dank für die Rückmeldung. Ich habe die Daten ja nicht im Original genutzt, sondern nur mittelbar (über meine Augen) ungefähr in die Karte übertragen. Wenn ich mich nicht irre, ist das bei derart für die öffentliche Diskussion gedachten Daten gerade noch erlaubt. (Bin auch nicht der erste, der das macht) Aber belehre mich gerne eines besseren.
Viele Grüße
Ohligser
scai (2016-10-17 15:52:11+00:00): Hallo Ohligser,

bin mir ehrlich gesagt nicht sicher ob das in Ordnung geht oder nicht. Bei amtlichen Werken gibt es ja eine Ausnahme, die sind gemeinfrei. Ob diese Daten darunter fallen oder nicht, weiß ich nicht. Ich sehe auf der Seite lediglich ein "© 2016 Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur". Das spricht gegen eine Verwendung in OSM, aber ich bin kein Anwalt und kann mich daher auch irren.

Grüße
Alex
indigomc (2016-10-15 07:32:36+00:00): You've deleted a way for a node here. Please justify this action.
mueschel (2016-10-14 10:26:57+00:00): Hi,
"grometry" is new to me. Guess you mean "source:geometry" on 68 ways.
Jan
LeTopographeFou (2017-03-11 00:37:52+00:00): Hi, you used access=permissive but according to the wiki access=private would better fit as soon as the airport is not open to general traffic. What do you think?
LeTopographeFou (2017-03-20 10:12:36+00:00): Modified to access=private in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47007664
user_5359 (2016-10-14 04:30:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare .
Владимир К (2016-10-14 10:46:02+00:00): а зачем же вы удалили дорожки и гаражи, которые я нарисовал по снимку? вы там были?
Kostik (2016-10-14 16:47:34+00:00): Ничего не путаем? Я ничего из перечисленного не удалял.
Владимир К (2016-10-16 17:42:43+00:00): хммм, да, дествительно, не заметил дубли. всё в порядке.
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-22 15:03:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43067946 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
rickmastfan67 (2016-10-14 02:57:36+00:00): Please make sure you update your changeset comment when you change to doing other things.  I don't think Butler, Pennsylvania is part of the Caribbean.
Sint E7 (2017-03-10 09:42:03+00:00): De relatie van lijn 176/576 kan verwijderd worden. Deze buslijnen zijn beide opgeheven per 10 december 2016.
maraf24 (2016-10-13 22:05:56+00:00): 1. Nie bar, ale fast_food
2. Nie nr 13, tylko nr 11. 
3. Na kopiowanie adresów z Google (nr 13) trzeba mieć zgodę Google. Pisemną.
Kot Behemot (2016-10-14 07:58:21+00:00): 1. Zaczynam tu zabawę, więc nie wiedziałem, że tzw. mleczny bar, to fast food. Chociaż ikonka kufelka była podejrzana
2. Adres to moja wina
3. Jeżeli coś Google zawłaszczy to koniec? Nie można tego umieścić w OSM???

Dzięki za feedback
Kot Behemot (2016-10-14 08:19:47+00:00): może ktoś się odezwie, kurde, czy jak wszędzie olewa się newbees, bo się nie znają? przeszedłem samouczek, ale kompletnie nie wiem co dalej
maraf24 (2016-10-14 09:03:14+00:00): 1. bar mleczny możnaby spróbowąć oznaczyć tagiem cuisine=polish_milk_bar, ale to chyba tylko ja tak oznaczam:)
2. ok
3. Nie, ale nie można kopiować z Google, bo na to brak licencji a poza tym są tam błędy - przynajmniej jeśli chodzi o adresy i ulice. Oczywiście jak ktoś spojrzy na zdjęcie satelitarne lub Street View to w praktyce jest to nie do wykrycia i ludzie to robią, ale lepiej się do tego nie przyznawać.
Tutaj jest polskie forum, tam można się pytać: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
Można też wysyłać wiadomości pocztą OSM (np. do mnie).
Ta rozmowa jest widoczna dla wszystkich, ale w zasadzie poza nami nikt o niej w tej chwili nie wie.
maraf24 (2016-10-14 09:04:39+00:00): I uwaga na tłumaczenie na polski użyte w maps.me - są tam błędy, np. bar, schronisko i parę innych - nie znaczą dokładnie tego, co by się wydawało, że znaczą. Lepiej edytować edytorem webowym na osm.org.
Kot Behemot (2016-10-14 09:09:04+00:00): czyli lepiej english używać? ale wtedy jak to będzie wyglądać dla ziomków? I jeszcze jedno pytanie - może wkurzające, bo często zadawane - jak przesunąć dobrze opisaną lokalizację ale oznaczoną ze 100 metrów nie w tą stronę? Całkiem likwidować i na nowo, czy jest jakaś opcja przesuwania?
maraf24 (2016-10-14 09:15:55+00:00): W Polsce stosujemy język polski. A jako nazwę umieszczamy to, co jest nazwą, opisy w polu do opisów. Można dodać wersję w innym języku, jeśli się komuś chce.
W maps.me nie przesuniesz. Nie do tego on służy. Przesuń na osm.org. Łatwo i przyjemnie.
NIe likwiduj i nie twórz na nowo, bo usuniesz w ten sposób historię zmian obiektu i zapewne nie skopiujesz wszystkich informacji z nim związanych, choćby z tego powodu, że maps.me nie pokazuje wszystkich i nie pozwala na wpisanie wszystkich.
Warin61 (2016-10-17 00:09:51+00:00): Reentered removal of touching rings. 
Confirmed relationships are closed using JOSM validator and JOE+SM relationship editor. 

If you find this relationship broken .. contact me .. I want to see what your talking about...
FvGordon (2016-10-17 20:55:56+00:00): See version 4 of way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/412929191/history : the last node of version 4 of this way is connected to one or more other ways, but the other end has been open (no connection to other ways). I connected this end to node 4029285618, which is member of other ways, to close the outer ring of relation 2363804.
mapper999 (2016-10-18 19:02:44+00:00): Danke für die Ergänzungen. Leider waren auf meinen Fotos die Geometrien nicht so gut erkennbar. Das Tor nördlich des Radsatzbearbeitungszentrum gibt es definitv noch. Ich frage mich aber gerade ob dieses Stück Gleis (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/99364813) tatsächlich so vorhanden ist oder ob vergessen wurde es auf "razed" zu setzen?
Nakaner (2016-10-18 19:08:33+00:00): Diese Frage habe ich mir vor Ort gestellt. :-) Das Stück existiert sowohl in meiner Skizze des Gleisplans als auch auf einem Handyfoto von mir. Das Gleisstück liegt im Asphalt und endet an der Asphaltkante. (Im Gras dahinter liegt kein Gleis) Ein Prellbock war nicht vorhanden, auch kein Sh 2. Es sieht nicht danach aus, als hätte die Anlage eilig in Betrieb gehen müssen. Denn das Gras dahinter sah nicht "vorläufig" aus.
kartler175 (2016-11-25 19:50:08+00:00): Wenn schon Fahrbahen aufteilen, dann bitte auch vollständig und keine verstümmelten Abbiegebeschränkungen zurücklassen:
http://keepright.at/report_map.php?lang=de&ch30=1&ch40=1&ch50=1&ch60=1&ch70=1&ch90=1&ch100=1&ch110=1&ch120=1&ch130=1&ch150=1&ch160=1&ch170=1&ch180=1&ch191=1&ch192=1&ch193=1&ch194=1&ch195=1&ch196=1&ch197=1&ch198=1&ch201=1&ch202=1&ch203=1&ch204=1&ch205=1&ch206=1&ch207=1&ch208=1&ch210=1&ch220=1&ch231=1&ch232=1&ch270=1&ch281=1&ch282=1&ch283=1&ch284=1&ch291=1&ch292=1&ch293=1&ch294=1&ch311=1&ch312=1&ch313=1&ch350=1&ch370=1&ch380=1&ch401=1&ch402=1&ch411=1&ch412=1&ch413=1&number_of_tristate_checkboxes=8&highlight_error_id=0&highlight_schema=0&lat=48.22849&lon=11.34064&zoom=15&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=0&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C295%2C296%2C297%2C298%2C402
user_5359 (2016-10-14 04:23:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your building please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship.
user_5359 (2016-10-14 04:18:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the building as area=yes. Please use building=yes.
user_5359 (2016-10-14 04:06:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

If you need help: You are welcome!
user_5359 (2016-10-14 03:56:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you mean this building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148481443 if you add the memorial?
Aleks-Berlin (2016-10-14 07:44:36+00:00): please follow the osm guidelines for wikipedia-key!
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
wikipedia="languange:Name" eg. "es:Name".
Thanks alot, Alex
BCNorwich (2016-10-17 06:10:37+00:00): Hello, sorry to say I think you've had a mishap with this changeset. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93715163

It looks like Way: Duddingston Gardens (93715163) has been aligned in a circle. Also dragging part of the railway fence, which shared several nodes, with it (Way: 405090252).

It might be best to revert the whole of this changeset (42883804). Thereby saving everything that existed before the mishap. If you're not familiar with reverting (which is not possible in the iD Editor I could revert it for you, please just ask. Regards
indigomc (2016-10-14 17:27:07+00:00): You deleted an outline of the hospital in this edit to add a simple node. This is unjustified removal of data. Please just change the tags in future. I will revert your change. Thanks.
sander79 (2017-02-28 20:47:42+00:00): Hoi Nick,

vraagje. Ik zie dat je met deze wijziging een aantal stukken 'wall' hebt toegevoegd.
(bv way=447599173 en 447599175)

Echter zijn dit allemaal kleine stukjes terwijl volgens mij er een hele lange muur langs het park loopt. (goed te zien op satelietbeelden). Heb je dit bewust zo toegevoegd, mist er nog iets of zit ik er naast ? :)

gr,
Sander
Hendrikklaas (2017-03-06 22:58:11+00:00): Niet alle overleg gaat via dit medium !
indigomc (2016-10-15 08:11:51+00:00): Deleted one existing hospital node. Created two others. The original should have been modified. Please correct.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
muralito (2016-10-16 16:01:39+00:00): Las cosas que marcaste como "monument" no lo son. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic=monument
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
mueschel (2016-10-16 11:13:14+00:00): Hi,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/446987924
has the tag "wight = 15.2" - should it be "width"?
Jan
mueschel (2016-10-15 13:01:36+00:00): Please do not use the OSM database for "search engine optimization" . All these tags on this POI are spam or do not follow common tagging rules and should not appear in OSM:



Hours of operation 	Mon-Fri: 8:00am-4:30pm
Payment options 	All
Services offered 	We produce control panels, labels, signs etc., in plastic, stainless steel, brass and aluminum.
description 	Can West Legacy Inc. is a CSA certified and UL listed label manufacturer in Calgary for both indoor and outdoor use. We provide CSA certified and UL recognized labeling, overlays and plates for virtually every conceivable application.
indigomc (2016-10-14 18:17:57+00:00): In this edit you deleted the highway = residential tag/value from the road. Assuming it is a mistake. Please take more care. Reverting the changeset.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:49:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
rza31 (2016-10-16 06:48:43+00:00): Hallo autohausochs,

z.B. so https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4450064009
MicDK (2017-06-20 11:55:53+00:00): Da "Medicinsk Sengeafsnit" og "Neurologisk Afdeling" ikke er selvstændige enheder (kun to af mange andre indenfor bygningen "Svendborg Sygehus"), har jeg flyttet dem ind som tags under selve sygehusbygningen.

Jeg er helt klar over, at der er tale om kontrolbesøg fra Fødevarestyrelsen. Naturligvis skal dine data derfor ikke slettes. Så jeg beholdt dine oplysninger om fvst-navn og -løbenummer. Dine data er altså kun flyttet til et mere hensigtsmæssigt sted. Hvor der senere kan lægges yderligere fvst-kontroldata ind (der er flere at finde på Fødevarestyrelsens hjemmeside/smileyordningen).

Med venlig hilsen
MicDK
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2017-06-20 12:28:03+00:00): Jeg kender ikke Svendborg sygehus.

Men de er vel placeret forskellige steder på sygehuset?

Hvis jeg nu putter fx Neurologisk afdeling i min GPS, vil jeg gerne havne på den rigtige parkeringsplads.
MicDK (2017-06-21 06:14:54+00:00): Det har du sådan set ret i. Men der er mange afdelinger, og de flytter sommetider rundt og skifter navn. Så der bliver noget at holde a'jourført.

Her er der et aktuelt kort over afdelinger mm. på Svendborg Sygehus:
http://www.ouh.dk/wm214898
Hecala (2016-10-14 12:06:09+00:00): Horario.de lunes a lunes 
11.30 am 23.30 am
Feriados abierto mismo horarios
Hecala (2016-10-14 12:07:57+00:00): Reiteró 11.30am a 15.00pn
              19.30am a 23.30pm
Zalitoar (2016-10-15 18:57:20+00:00): Podés agregar los horarios vos mismo ya que tenés usuario, se agrega con el tag opening_hours https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
RafalR (2016-11-01 09:59:28+00:00): O ile to możliwe proszę dodawać w nazwie nazwę a nie opis.
scai (2016-10-14 16:19:07+00:00): Die Bank https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4447123731 war doch bereits eingetragen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/295078609

Entfernst du deinen Eintrag wieder?
EneaSuper (2016-10-14 08:48:06+00:00): Queste novità sono molto interessanti, ottimo lavoro :)
Ryan Gilmour (2016-10-14 07:29:33+00:00): Buildings have been mapped, roads are still to be mapped.
mueschel (2016-10-14 20:43:43+00:00): Hi,
I found some tags like 
destination:backward:hsb
Is hsb a language code? I can't find it in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639-1_codes

If it is, the correct tag is destination:lang:XX:backward, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Destination_details

Cheers, Jan
J budissin (2016-10-14 21:08:49+00:00): Yes, I noticed it too late and will correct the mistakes. "hsb" is Upper Sorbian (ISO 639-2). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_Sorbian_language
jaap de vries (2016-11-02 15:06:55+00:00): wat heb je hier gedaan, want je hebt geen reactie ingevuld?
user_5359 (2016-10-14 17:13:52+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:59:39+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-22 21:50:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58321257 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old MAPS.ME 'artworks' in Baku
j-wills (2016-11-04 19:54:57+00:00): что за тег такой traffic_calming=dip ???
EneaSuper (2016-10-14 09:10:07+00:00): Era ora che venisse tolto xD
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2022-05-09 19:54:28+00:00): Hi Laska
Thank you for adding the route "Jesolo Ambient Bike - Percorso grigio" (id 6645868). Unfortunately, after 12 years, this route is still unsigned (I rode it 2 days ago). I propose to delete this relation. Rationale:
(i) OSM route must be signposted - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbicycle
(ii) to copy from maps is an infringement of copyright. 
What do you think about this?
Robert
Laska (2022-05-10 06:42:46+00:00): I can't understand why to delete...
(i) OSM says that a bike route is a "named or numbered or otherwise signed routes". The route is named, numbered and proposed at info points in town, but not signposted. The track is still official. I think also (that you can say) that there aren't any difficulties or changes in the route. Almost all the track I know aren't fully signposted.
(ii) If I cycle along the route (as I did some years ago) and than add the route the the osm database, I don't think is copyright infringement...
But if you still think it's not worth to keep, I trust you, and you can delete it.
Bye
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2022-05-10 21:40:21+00:00): Hi Laska,
Ok, I will not delete it, but tag it as "proposed": https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=747358#p747358
If the itinerary is ever signposted, just adjust the tagging.
Regarding copyright: you should ask Ambient Bike Jesolo for permission to enter the itinerary in OSM.
Robert
highflyer74 (2016-10-14 17:38:15+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall stellt sich die Frage: was ist der "Bilderprofi"? Das müsste man dann mit dem entsprechenden Tag hinzufügen.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

Oliver