piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skusche (2022-04-17 13:19:16+00:00): Das mit dem "trail_visibility=horrible" oder "trail_visibility=no" kann man auch nachträglich eintragen.
VG
uvi (2022-04-18 06:52:42+00:00): Richtig, alle Schlüsel und Werte kann man auch nachtträglich ergänzen/ändern. Ich hatte den Weg aber eben gelöscht, da er  für mich nicht vorhanden war. 
... und jetzt wieder ergänzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1052601452
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-02-18 18:38:29+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 117472169, 117472749, 117473378, 117523724.
praeteritum (2022-07-16 06:24:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123676645.
LockOnGuy (2022-10-11 07:03:52+00:00): Why did you delete name:ar  for node 5585896622 node 5587614931 ? they were correct!         
And you also changed the 'name' tag from Arabic to Kurdish and remove the Arabic name entirely, why? thats for node 5476253822 node 5476264721 node 5585896622 and node 5587614931
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117577745
praeteritum (2022-07-15 04:34:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123632802.
Syl (2022-02-25 15:59:02+00:00): Bonjour, il manque la relation de la Rue Consolat. Vous avez enlevé le nom qui était sur les numéros de cette rue dans ce groupe de modifications.
Marcos Dione (2025-05-11 19:06:11+00:00): Bonjour. L'Avenue des Mimosas dans le 15ème et cell du 9ème n'ont rien à voir. J'enlève celle du 15ème de la relation.
tuxayo (2025-08-09 21:13:48+00:00): > L'Avenue des Mimosas dans le 15ème et cell du 9ème n'ont rien à voir. 

Même problème pour l'Impasse des Chalets.

Ces 3 voies se sont trouvées dans la même relation.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/696236922
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170262320
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330637560

Corrigé pour ça mais il y a sûrement pleins d'autres cas.
tuxayo (2025-08-10 16:15:03+00:00): Oh non, Impasse Fouque aussi.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853333637#map=19/43.282785/5.356981
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/853333636#map=19/43.282843/5.357577
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64728508#map=19/43.282732/5.356441
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444410789#map=19/43.365480/5.311159

Il doit y avoir tout les homonymes entre arrondissements! :o
tuxayo (2025-08-10 16:23:35+00:00): Est-ce qu'il y a d'autres villes avec le même traitement fait?
Frans S (2022-02-22 10:14:16+00:00): Hola. Gracias por mapear aquí.
Por favor, cuadra cada edificio que mapees y etiquétalo como building=yes.
Gracias

Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please square each building you map and tag them as building=yes.
Thanks
praeteritum (2022-07-15 04:31:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123632677.
Frans S (2022-02-24 11:53:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A few remarks.  When you map paths/roads please ty to connect them to each other where possible.
A path needs no extra tag as unpaved. 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117578461
praeteritum (2022-07-14 04:24:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123587948.
praeteritum (2022-07-14 04:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123587942.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
literan (2022-02-19 12:08:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE 

это не тег name, не имена собственные
praeteritum (2022-07-14 04:22:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123587928.
praeteritum (2022-07-14 04:21:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123587912.
gscscnd (2022-02-19 07:45:10+00:00): Dzięki!
praeteritum (2022-07-14 04:20:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123587873.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-02 14:26:58+00:00): ¿Por qué diseñaron aquí una vía terciaria? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9517429191 No parece haber una carretera de este nivel aquí, como mucho una pista para 4x4, pero ni siquiera veo eso
Jtapia92 (2022-07-02 17:29:09+00:00): La vía está ahí, se debería considerar que las imágenes satelitales que sirven como insumo para mapear en OSM no están actualizadas. Por lo que se han utilizado imágenes actuales para ello a través de JOSM
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-02 21:44:46+00:00): oh genial, ahora podía verlo mirando la capa Sentinel. Pero degradaré esta ruta, es demasiado estrecha e informal para ser terciaria. https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2L2A&lat=-3.5737196121535786&lng=-78.48948240280151&zoom=16&preset=1_TRUE_COLOR&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=20&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2022-01-01%7C2022-07-02&atmFilter=&showDates=false
Bellgium (2022-02-23 11:35:58+00:00): Please use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments and don't try to disguise large area changes als "
kleinigkeiten geändert" (just "small stuff")!
Barny22 (2022-02-23 17:02:44+00:00): I just started editing in OpenstreetMap. Sorry for my bad commend, next time I'll do better. And thanks for this nice link.
praeteritum (2022-07-14 04:17:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123587778.
Lee Carré (2022-02-18 20:13:19+00:00): Much, much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Emilius123 (2022-02-18 20:28:40+00:00): what is a changeset?
Allison P (2022-02-18 20:35:30+00:00): Who is Candice?
Lee Carré (2022-02-18 20:36:38+00:00): “what is a changeset?”

Either you're trolling, or shouldn't be editing OSM.

Follow the link above, scroll to the top. Start reading.

Don't make any more changes until you've comprehended all of it.
Emilius123 (2022-02-18 23:01:27+00:00): I have not comprehended. I have ascended.

Far beyond human understanding, my soul now lies, far, far away.


Also, I rather create a juicy, big changeset once than artifically inflating my changeset count, spreading small edits, which belong into small changesets into dozens.
Allison P (2022-02-18 23:04:33+00:00): Changeset count is meaningless. OSM is not a competition. You're not artificially inflating anything. Changesets are supposed to group together related edits, and edits nearly halfway across the globe from each other are far from that.

Please clarify your source; "Candice" is not helpful on its own.
Emilius123 (2022-02-19 17:18:06+00:00): Candice changeset fit yo mouth?
Allison P (2022-02-19 18:40:59+00:00): If there is no source needed, as is the case here, the source tag can be avoided altogether.
Lee Carré (2022-02-20 08:43:08+00:00): “Who is Candice?”

Probably an associate of Joe, see http://osm.org/changeset/117062613

While this may be a metadata-only prankster, that would be rare. Sloppy metadata usually means sloppy work / changes.

Since unknown sources can't be verified, the changesets should be reverted.
Lee Carré (2022-02-20 08:47:22+00:00): “I have ascended.

Far beyond human understanding, my soul now lies, far, far away.”

OSM is beneath you, then.
praeteritum (2022-07-13 04:43:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123542979.
pitfire (2022-02-19 05:20:52+00:00): Hallo tadams,
bist Du dir sicher, dass der Überweg Knoten: 253070141 "traffic_signals" und nicht nur "zebra" ist "siehe VZ 350". Wurden dort jetzt Fussgängerampeln aufgestellt?
praeteritum (2022-07-13 04:42:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123542949.
praeteritum (2022-07-12 04:24:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123497491.
ma-rt-in (2022-02-20 17:50:04+00:00): Hallo,

Mehrfamilienhäuser werden mit building=aparments getaggt. Deine Änderung zu residential beschreibt es nur als allg. Wohnhaus.

vg
praeteritum (2022-07-12 04:23:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123497483.
Frans S (2022-02-25 10:08:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not  accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions). You oversized the buildings. f.e. A building of 6.5 mtr long has been mapped as a building of 18 mtr long. Please zoom in that far that you can draw accurate.
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.
When you map a residential area, pleas map also the buildings inside the area.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117580222
praeteritum (2022-07-12 04:19:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123497365.
ivanbranco (2022-02-19 09:23:05+00:00): Hi PlaneMad,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6057703168/history

was this supposed to be =village?
Shaun das Schaf (2023-08-10 20:33:55+00:00): Hallo ChillyDL,

wenn iD vorschlägt, bei einer Weg-Bach-Kreuzung eine Brücke hinzuzufügen, dann tu dies bitte nur, wenn du weisst dass sich dort auch tatsächlich eine Brücke befindet.

Ich bin jetzt schon auf etliche von dir eingetragene Brücken gestoßen, wo eigentlich gar keine sind, sondern Röhren. Im Zweifelsfall die Warnung von iD lieber ignorieren anstatt was falsches einzutragen.

Danke und viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
ChillyDL (2023-08-11 07:21:14+00:00): Hallo Shaun das Schaf,
ja, da hast du völlig Recht. Das stammt noch aus der Zeit, als ich iD folgsam sein wollte und mir die Alternative culvert nicht klar war. Ich hatte irgendwann mal mir alle Warnungen im oberen Kandertal von iD anzeigen lassen und bearbeitet, da waren vermutlich 50+ Weg-Bach-Kreuzungen dabei. 
Ich hatte diese von mir daraufhin eingefügten "Brücken" bisher drin gelassen, weil ich wegen der iD-Warnung vermutet habe, dass unmögliche Weg-Bach-Kreuzungen schlimmer sind als Brücken, die eigentlich ein Durchlass sind.
Sollte ich diese falschen Brücken stattdessen löschen? Was meinst du?
abrensch (2022-02-19 11:13:11+00:00): Hello Raa39,

why is this segment oneway, making the whole motorway a oneway?

thanx, Arndt
Raa39 (2022-02-19 11:22:03+00:00): Ремон автомагистрали.
praeteritum (2022-07-12 04:16:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123497357.
Carto'Cité (2022-08-09 14:40:29+00:00): Bonjour Nzau,
J'ai vu que tu contribuais beaucoup sur la thématique des aménagements cyclables. Merci pour ton investissement sur ce sujet.
De mon côté j'interviens avec Geovelo pour la Région Normandie pour améliorer et maintenir les données de cette thématique. Tu vas donc probablement voir quelques modifications de ma part et je t'invite à ne pas hésiter à me questionner ou me faire des observations.
Je me permets de corriger les modifications que tu as apportées à cette voie verte : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230028266. En effet le contributeur Eric CD14 a précisé qu'il y avait un panneau traffic_sign=FR:C115 ce qui en fait une voie verte et donc les tag bicycle=designated et foot=designated étaient bons. J'ai vu que tu l'avais passé de path à cycleway puis à path à nouveau et oui il vaut mieux le laisser en path.
À bientôt.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
user_5359 (2022-02-21 06:17:35+00:00): Hello! Please notice type is reserved for data type relation.

Is the licence of this data compatible with OSM?
Frans S (2022-02-20 10:25:07+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key.
Please map all buildings in a village/hamlet and mark it with a tag as described in the instructions.
Best regards and keep mapping
ElliottPlack (2022-02-23 04:20:18+00:00): Mass deletion
ElliottPlack (2022-02-23 04:20:34+00:00): OSM is not for testing
Mashin (2022-02-20 19:16:23+00:00): Hi zzmzzm. Actually the path is there. You can also check on Maxar premium imagery, which is the most up to date.

Cheers
praeteritum (2022-07-12 04:14:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123497298.
ivanbranco (2022-02-19 11:12:54+00:00): Hi Reedyn,

no park=sat 07:00-14:00 is not a valid tag. You could add a conditional access restriction to the parking though.
reedyn (2022-02-19 11:31:31+00:00): Thanks, I only had a look and corrected some of the tags and the positioning.

I removed the invalid tag. The parking restriction is not regular enough to warrant a tag imo. Most weeks the marketplace only takes up some of the space so the parking is still open.
praeteritum (2022-07-11 05:06:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123454307.
os-emmer (2022-08-07 19:23:18+00:00): Hallo Amegaz,
du hast im Rahmen dieses Änderungssatzes einen Punkt ohne Inhalt eingefügt. War das Absicht?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9450325828
SomeoneElse (2022-08-30 16:53:22+00:00): Westerdale not West Witton
Welshie (2022-08-30 17:02:21+00:00): you are correct. I've corrected the name of the STW and the ref
abrensch (2022-02-19 11:09:25+00:00): Hallo Raa39,

do you think it's o.k. to place a "block" on a major road with just the comment "changes" ?

Can ypou explain whats up here?

thanx, Arndt
Raa39 (2022-02-19 11:21:21+00:00): Дорога закрыта на ремонт. Знаки стоят, дорога в тупик.
skyper (2022-02-20 15:49:30+00:00): Hallo ChillyDLesby
Leider hat iD mal wieder die Mitglieder von Route-Relationen mit Schleifen durcheinandergewirbelt, siehe PTNA (https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BW/DE-BW-RVL-Analysis.html#bus_4) und Forum u.a. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=855482#p855482.
Kannst Du das bitte noch mal anschauen.

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2022-02-21 11:59:54+00:00): So, habe es korrigiert. War in diesem Fall nicht kompliziert:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117678376

Mit JOSM wäre das nicht passiert.
Viele Grüße,
skyper
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-11 13:37:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694055627/history - czy w tym budynku jest sklep Żabka?

Czy restauracja lub hotelik dalej tam są?
SiataaA (2022-03-12 00:34:25+00:00): Tak, Jest zarówno Żabka jak i restauracja
eggie (2022-02-19 14:40:50+00:00): Beste Padvinder.. Zou je  bos en water willen scheiden en niet over elkaar willen leggen. Het water heb ik weer uitgesneden. 
MVG
eggie
tonyf1 (2023-08-31 09:01:55+00:00): Parks Victoria Lysterfield actively removes illegal bike tracks like this. Having illegal tracks mapped encourages traffic and makes closing them harder.

I understand fully that OSM maps what is on the ground. Yesterday Parks Vic deconstructed the path and it is not trafficable. It will probably be made trafficable by cyclists then not
trafficable by Parks. Eventually Parks wins but at considerable cost of public money.

I have added access=no for the moment.
I would like to add the lifecycle prefix disused:highway=path
subject to a commitment by Parks that it will be kept in an untrafficable state.
tonyf1 (2023-09-01 06:25:39+00:00): Hi, I have added the lifecycle prefix. This is consistent with what is on the ground. Parks has to keep the path untrafficable going forward to keep the disused: prefix. Please before reinstating, contact the Area Chief Ranger or the Team Leader of Parks Victoria, Lysterfield to discuss. Thanks, Tony
TheSwavu (2023-09-01 09:32:38+00:00): Well that took a bit of head scratching to figure out why I had mapped this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2783807). I've changed it to demolished rather than disused as it is being actively removed.
tonyf1 (2023-09-01 10:32:36+00:00): Thanks
Tony
tastrax (2022-02-21 03:00:46+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
demon_box (2022-05-12 15:42:02+00:00): please, DON'T move my "noexit" tag from way to node... OK?
thanks ;-)
--enrico
conradoos (2022-05-12 19:20:57+00:00): I thought that the all the tags are ours and we should apply wiki rules.
Anyway, does any app support tag noexit=yes on ways?
demon_box (2022-05-12 19:51:08+00:00): oook, bye.
Trevor_1 (2022-02-18 23:29:46+00:00): *also downgraded to tertiary
ThreeOutOfFourCorners (2022-02-25 01:05:20+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2022-01-22
ThreeOutOfFourCorners (2022-02-25 16:58:42+00:00): Correction: Source used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2022-01-01
ottwiz (2022-02-23 11:40:28+00:00): Please don't put landuse=forest on National forests because the wood landcover doesn't always respect the border. This is one of the rules in OSM so-to say about public lands
John Bek (2022-02-19 00:37:09+00:00): Source was meant to be - DCS NSW Imagery. Accidentally did a cut and paste with "Frankies" source
sp!rt (2022-04-27 19:08:05+00:00): А почему парковка между 104 и 104В домами с access=private? Обычный же кусок асфальта для парковки авто жильцов и гостей без средств ограничения доступа.
ottwiz (2022-02-19 20:09:12+00:00): I forgot to put Esri World imagery, because i had it turned off in the Layer list when mapped from NAIP. Sorry :D
ottwiz (2022-02-19 20:09:45+00:00): Oh wait.. wrong changeset, since i've done other mapping since then
ottwiz (2022-02-19 20:10:24+00:00): that'd be 117617749  but it's good as I see
zstadler (2022-04-02 12:09:01+00:00): Hello Yamilo,

In this edit you have deleted the "wikipedia:en" tag for the Dead Sea relation.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9351124

I assume this was by mistake. Right?
zstadler (2022-05-31 17:24:27+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121778035
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-05-20 18:27:44+00:00): Hello,

I noticed you added a `name:pa-Arab` tag here alongside `name:pnb`. `name:pnb` is the most common existing way to tag Punjabi names in Shahmukhi; the use of `name:pa-Arab` has potential to add confusion by splitting up localizations. (The ISO suffixes are also poorly defined for languages used in Pakistan; technically the separate `-Aran` suffix would be the intended one in their schema, but it is unlikely to be recognized by data consumers. `pnb` has more widespread support.
Jacksonville (2022-05-20 19:03:52+00:00): Hi! Yes I add both tags, just in case one or the other is used by other 3rd party sites (for instance - I know Spotify & MSN weirdly use the pa-Arab tags for the localised Shahmukhi page), otherwise I'm mainly for the 'pnb' ISO code. It's also the code used by Wiki projects.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-06-01 23:11:56+00:00): Interesting, I had no idea Spotify and MSN did that
dadavid (2022-02-24 14:53:47+00:00): Hallo, 

wenn du mehrere Namen für ein Objekt eintragen möchtest, dann trage sie am besten in alt_name ein und trenne mit einem Semikolon ;
im Wiki steht dazu: If there are multiple names that do not fit, alt_name=* can be used with semicolons. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Multiple_names

viele Grüße
David
WAM_SNZ144_ZCH (2022-02-26 11:14:32+00:00): Habe ich umgeschrieben !!!!
AngocA (2022-02-27 05:33:50+00:00): Hola Federico. He visto que has agregado ríos, pero no le incluyes el tipo de cuerpo de agua. La guía de mapeo indica que esto se debe agregar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear#R.C3.ADos
AngocA (2022-03-09 16:22:15+00:00): Ya lo corregí, agregando el tipo de cuerpo de agua, en este caso "Río".
蝦夷狼 (2022-02-20 22:31:54+00:00): Where is the documentation of your https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct ?
ZeLonewolf (2022-02-20 22:42:50+00:00): Go away Michael.
Lee Carré (2022-02-19 10:24:57+00:00): Much, much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
JeroenHoek (2022-02-19 18:04:57+00:00): Lee: usually, a correct admonition, but Jacksonville only added the Urdu for the Netherlands to exactly one object (the nation's relation). It is impossible to do that in a smaller changeset.

Can't help it that our kingdom includes some bits of colonial heritage in the Caribbean.
Lee Carré (2022-02-20 08:31:28+00:00): “Netherlands”

Oh, quite right. Ignore my comment, then.

I'll try to avoid such requests for wide-spanning relations.
Jacksonville (2022-02-20 15:11:06+00:00): Hi, I have been guilty of doing this in other cases too, but I will refrain from doing this now on. 

Thanks!
ivanbranco (2022-02-19 09:06:55+00:00): Hi CHAINDER19,

you mass-deleted (here and in many more changeset) buildings. Is there a specific reason why you delete them instead of redrawing them? With the second method we could keep the history of the element: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Vinber-Pro (2022-02-22 16:11:13+00:00): Hi,
you requested a review :)

You're changeset is too big (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)

There's no comments on your changeset (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments)

Regards
Mashin (2022-02-22 22:09:30+00:00): Hi Andrew, thanks for the great work on hiking trails. CT is starting to look really good.
Though I've just had a recent discussion that some of the trails might not exist any more. For example this trail way/1032794466 seems to have been completely physically removed by the land management. 
Are you using Strava traces to add some of the trails? I think we might want to be more careful about those. A in-person survey would be the best solution to make sure that the trails still exist. 
It also brings a bunch of issues that the Trail Working Group is trying to solve on OSM US Slack. Often bikers or hikers create their own routes that then show up on Strava and after they are being added to OSM, more people start to use them, which causes unwanted traffic and soil erosion. As you can imagine this goes against the nature conservation efforts.

Current idea is that if the trail does not exist, don't map it. If it exists and has sign prohibiting use, add `access=no`. If path is clearly not made for official use mark it `informal=yes`. More in depth information is summarized on this wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/Trail_Access_Project

cheers
andrewsuzuki (2022-02-24 02:28:59+00:00): Hi Mashin, sounds good. Yeah I've been working off the Strava heatmap a fair bit, and also off single activities I see on my Strava feed (including in the case of that particular way you linked). But yes, my MO until now has been to create existing trails regardless and let others come in with access tags if appropriate...including myself, because I would like to ground-truth many of these trails at some point, and having all the known trails on the map/routers regardless of status certainly helps with doing that in the smallest amount of time. I've been tempted to use access=unknown but I assume routers/tiles don't treat those any differently. Anyway, thanks for the note -- I'll refrain from adding trails that I don't know are legal!
Mashin (2022-03-01 21:56:19+00:00): Thanks Andrew!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-22 16:34:05+00:00): Why was the building tagged as a highway?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117589676