piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-10-10 14:48:17+00:00): Hi. Another point.
When a road is connecting buildings/hamlets etc, please do not tag it as track.
See this wiki about how to tag highways
 African countries:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127273068
LeJoshMont (2022-10-10 02:02:33+00:00): I am not sure if anyone can see this but I made this edit / contribution  in error. I need help undoing it but I can't find a way to.
archpdx (2022-10-10 06:40:40+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! I've undid these changes in (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127282190) and changed building:entrances=home to building=house on the address you created
LeJoshMont (2022-10-10 22:10:29+00:00): Thank you for the help. Just a slight learning curve from google maps. Though I like how detailed OSM can be.
Peter Newman (2022-10-18 12:40:37+00:00): @DaveF can I ask why you've done this?

It removes lots of useful and indeed vital context from these ways and just generates issues such as these:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3401078

Particularly when there are multiple lines at the same station, and given there don't appear to be any relations between platform and line.

Also as you can see from the list of ways, they're pretty unmanageable too as you've no way to differentiate them to even which line they're on.

I'd also argue it doesn't match the wiki guidance "This key is set to the primary name of the feature in the real world." as you'd have the same chaos I'm encountering at any station with multiple lines if there were multiple all labelled only "Northbound".
DaveF (2022-10-19 09:16:04+00:00): You're unclear as to to what your streecomplete problem was. Could you expand?
Peter Newman (2022-10-19 10:32:08+00:00): So SC shows a question such as "Is there a waste basket at this stop?", then describes the node it's asking the question about, showing normally things like name and type, so in this case I now just get "Northbound (Subway Platform)" or similar. But likewise if I do an Overpass search, or consume the data in any other way, then there's no context to the platforms even around one station:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mU0

Plus more crucially as I mentioned, I don't believe this name tagging is in line with general usage or the wiki recommendations.

Could you expand on the reasons and benefits of making this particular change?
DaveF (2022-10-19 14:48:11+00:00): Bullet points, in no particular order:

It's still not 100% clear what "stop" and "node" is. Is it referring to a railway station? Shouldn't SC be selecting the platforms & providing you with the unique id?

If you've been there to survey it, won't you know which platform your editing?

How do you deal with all those that haven't had a name tag added?

Can't you click on the track adjacent to the platform to obtain the data you require?  

Railway station/line/track/destination information does not belong on platform name tags.

There's a fair argument to say platforms don't have genuine names, just references.

Fudging information into the name tags to sort other shortcomings elsewhere is not the correct solution.

Isn't that what PTv2 was conceived for?

Adding the unnecessary gumpf either prevents labels from rendering or obscures adjacent data.
Frans S (2022-10-10 13:26:35+00:00): Hello.  My comment on changeset 127274030 is also applicable on these mappings.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127274030
MacLondon (2022-10-13 10:14:54+00:00): Hi. I've added a 'via' node that was missing from the 2 turn restrictions you'd added.
Milhouse (2022-10-13 10:56:19+00:00): Brilliant, thanks! ID didn't warn me, but I noticed that OSMCha spotted an error.
yasslay (2022-10-15 23:18:08+00:00): Hello!

Please don't add overlapping features to OSM or features which are already mapped. This edit will be reverted.

Kind regards,
yasslay
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-11 00:03:43+00:00): Hi nolanzek!

Welcome to OSM.

We have different tags that we can use when we map parks and playgrounds as there are slight differences in what those two features are and how they are used.

You can read more on the OSM wiki, here:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park?uselang=en

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-11 11:48:31+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10088204393/history has fixme:type = parking that was added in this edit
Is it a parking for cars? (amenity=parking)
for bicycles? (amenity=bicycle_parking)
Something else?
bijsgohsdacu (2025-04-11 12:29:27+00:00): I forgot about this, I intended to add it later, thanks for reminding me. I just made the edit to add the carpark.
MxxCon (2022-10-10 05:01:17+00:00): Hello.
Rather than outright delete this node, it's better to use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix or at the very least delete biz-specific info but keep the address node. As a result of your edit here 224 E83rd becomes unsearchable..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127275237
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
adrianojbr (2022-10-10 14:31:05+00:00): Olá, Bianchini85!

Muito boa sua iniciativa de detalhar o mapa em Itajaí e região.

Fica o alerta quanto ao mapeamento de vias para bicicletas. Na praia dos amores há uma ciclofaixa (sem barreira física da via para carros), o que já estava corretamente indicada na linha da via como cycleway:right=lane. No entanto, você criou uma linha paralela e etiquetou como highway=cycleway, o que indica que seria uma ciclovia (com barreira física da via para carros). Etiquetei a linha adicionada como calçada.

Para mais informações sobre vias cicláveis favor acessar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

Abraço!
adrianojbr (2022-10-10 14:43:25+00:00): Aproveito também para lembrar que não se deve alinhar as vias e demais elementos exclusivamente pelas imagens de satélite, conforme https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Align_aerial_imagery_before_tracing
adrianojbr (2022-10-10 15:02:08+00:00): Agora uma pergunta:

Faz tempo que não vou na Brava Norte. Foi construída ciclovia ou ciclofaixa?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102477112#map=16/-26.9360/-48.6277
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
abakus_uploader (2022-10-10 22:31:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
rhtb0 (2022-10-10 05:46:07+00:00): Hello onlywalker
Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments - you name “onlywalker” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.
rhtb0 (2022-10-10 05:46:36+00:00): See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Glassman (2022-10-11 17:48:34+00:00): The parking node is in the apartments landuse area so adding the apartment name is redundant.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127277440
Glassman (2022-10-11 17:47:35+00:00): It looks like you added a duplicate driveway. I removed the duplicate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127277476
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
catdreamer (2022-11-16 08:07:36+00:00): 抱歉，已經有人標示一個無雙山東峰，麻煩路線巡一下再標示，如果他人標錯可上OSM台灣社團詢問確認後修改，而不是一再鬧雙包。相同錯誤也在呂禮山中峰的標示上，這會造成他人困擾
catdreamer (2022-10-24 03:10:04+00:00): 出現了二個中霸尖山https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126547685#map=15/24.4663/121.2409
mmis-berg (2022-10-12 21:07:40+00:00): Dein Phantombahnsteiggebäude hatte ich schon einmal vor 6 Monaten entfernt.
Das Gebäude wurde 1998 abgerissen und wird auch garantiert nicht wieder aufgebaut.
Lokai (2022-10-13 09:30:28+00:00): Hallo, um was genau handelte es sich dabei? Ein altes Luftbild ist wohl nicht benutzt worden, da dort ein Bahnsteigdach die Sicht versperrt.
mmis-berg (2022-10-13 10:01:35+00:00): Es handelte sich um ein Bahnsteiggebäude für die Zugabfertigung, wie es so ähnlich noch am nächsten Bahnhof im Schönfließ zu finden ist. Im übrigen wurde die Wilhelmstraße in diesem Bereich in Ahornallee umbenannt, so dass die alte Adresse in keinem Fall mehr genutzt werden kann.
user_53559 (2022-10-14 16:26:49+00:00): Ich habe das Gebäude jetzt entfernt und werde die Adresse in den nächsten Tagen auch bei der Hausnummernauswertung von regio-osm.de tilgen.
Niels GM (2022-12-20 20:37:36+00:00): Nogle af adresserne (23, 25, 27, 29A) på den gamle højskoles grund  i Skælskør har stadig labels (housename); hvem retter/sletter dem?
b-holdet (2022-12-21 12:25:38+00:00): Det er der ingen der gør automatisk.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/AutoAWS#Updating_addresses
Niels GM (2022-12-21 12:28:27+00:00): Ok, tak. Det er så kommunen / DAR der tager sig af det, tænker jeg.
Supaplex (2022-10-10 15:05:30+00:00): 請依據 Life cycle 方式標示，用highway=proposed proposed=motorway
標示
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127280881
user_5359 (2022-10-12 12:42:09+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1102502800 (one of three objects). What is the meaning of the tags
land_use_code = 7590
land_use_descr = Other Open Green Space
?
Frans S (2022-10-10 14:37:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped very precise ! 
I reviewed a number of your changesets. All qualified as very good mapped.
If you keep this mapping quality, you can switch off the "review requested" box in iDeditor
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127281324
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:46:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Nakaner-repair (2022-10-10 09:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127289700 where the changeset comment is: Revert questionable changeset (building crossing street, removal of highway=bus_stop)
Wulf4096 (2022-10-22 08:36:59+00:00): Moin,
warum socket:type2_combo=0 an https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5021380394 ?
dkf2010 (2022-10-22 10:05:59+00:00): Der CCS-Anschluss ist defekt und wird meiner Kenntnis nach auch nicht mehr repariert. Die Säule soll wohl irgendwann komplett ersetzt werden.
surveyor54 (2022-10-10 09:19:10+00:00): Hi,
ist das richtig, aus Netto Marken-Discount , Netto + 𝙊𝙧𝙩𝙨𝙣𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙣 zu machen?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Unternehmensketten#Netto_Marken-Discount
Grüße
Wetterauer (2022-10-10 12:38:10+00:00): Ob der Name das gleiche beinhalten sollte wie das Branding, da habe ich meine Zweifel. Wenn ich jemanden nach dem Weg frage, sage ich doch auch nicht: 
Können Sie mir sagen wie ich zu Netto Markendiscount komme. 
Da fragt man doch ehe: Wie bitte komme ich zu Netto.
amadvance (2022-10-10 21:51:09+00:00): Ciao Cric_16,

Ho rimosso il nome "CAI 588" dalla way, in quanto la way è già parte della relazione che ha già quella informazione. Puoi trovare queste regole in questa pagina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Hiking

Ciao,
Andrea
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:50:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Hufkratzer (2022-10-10 18:29:00+00:00): Hi, wieso hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102512825 mit leisure=horse_riding getaggt? Das sieht doch eher aus wie ein einfacher Reitplatz. Nach dem Wiki sollte ein Reitplatz die Tags  leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian bekommen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz), und Anfang des Jahres hast du ja auch einige Reitplätze als pitche getaggt (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1025134325). Also wie kommt dieser Sinneswandel? Das betrifft auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085249868 (von vor 2 Monaten).
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
chris66 (2024-06-26 18:29:17+00:00): Neee, das ist kein Biergarten, nur ein Aussensitzbereich des Cafes.

leisure=outdoor_seating
BlindPainter (2022-10-10 09:02:14+00:00): Why move this node?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6953140753#map=17/31.46198/120.33067
BlindPainter (2022-10-10 09:03:08+00:00): And this
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7083461095
surveyor54 (2022-12-07 10:12:48+00:00): Hi,
du hast bei diesem Behindertenparkplatz fee=yes eingetragen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/783154518

Das ist  falsch. Bei ausgeschilderten Behindertenparkplätzen wird grundsätzlich keine Parkgebühr verlangt.
Bitte wieder ändern.

Gruß
surveyor54
RamanKazadoi (2022-10-10 07:40:33+00:00): And customer's feedback
rempshaener (2025-06-29 09:47:01+00:00): Hallo,
ich bin gerade über deine Ergänzung von emergency=fire_detection_system gestolpert. In der aktuellen Form kollidiert das meines Erachtens mit der "one feature, one element"-Regel. So sind jetzt Gebäude-Eigenschaften mit der BMA vermischt.
Entweder die BMA wird separat erfasst oder wir benötigen ein Tag wie fire_detection_system=yes für Gebäude.
Viele Grüße
plennert (2025-06-29 18:25:52+00:00): Hallo rempshaener,
naja, es ist ja eine Gebäudeeigenschaft, d. h. fest mit dem Gebäude verknüpft, ähnlich einer Farbe ...
... und im Regelfall ist die BMA im gesamten Gebäude vorhanden. Daher ist m. E. einer Verknüpfung sinnvoll und folgerichtig.
Beste Grüsse
rempshaener (2025-06-29 18:58:55+00:00): Hallo,
genau diese Verknüpfung ist es gerade nicht, es ist ein weiteres  (Top-Level-) Tag, sodass man jetzt nicht mehr weiß, welche Eigenschaft zu building und welche zu emergency gehört. Daher mein Vorschlag zu fire_detection_system=yes - das wäre eindeutig.
Viele Grüße
plennert (2025-06-29 19:05:54+00:00): sehe ich aus einem anderen Blickwinkel. Alles was fest in einem Gebäude installiert bzw. zugeordnet werden kann und soll gehört für mich auf so ausgewiesen/deklariert. Einge Gebäude- bzw. Raumzuordnung ist zwingend.

es heisst ja gerade
emergency=fire_detection_system. Damit ist es eindeutig zu emergency zugeordnet.

Viele Grüsse
mavl (2024-11-13 05:34:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Supaplex (2025-08-21 05:09:00+00:00): 你好：

好像看起來怪怪的，比對其他地圖以及政府的公告資訊，應該不是公園吧？

注意OpenStreetMap歡迎基於事實的編輯，但不能假冒事物，甚至為了遊戲關係加假公園
參考：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

相關的不實編輯將被移除
eggie (2022-10-10 08:19:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Tip.. gebruik highway=crossing alleen als er iets is aangegeven op de weg dmv strepen, vluchtheuvel, zebra e.d.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-10 08:24:48+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=41.458474%2C-70.618312%2C16.30
sheldonelectric (2024-10-22 14:41:08+00:00): You changed from fee=yes to fee=no but kept the charge=0.33 
Which one is correct?
Tomislav Ivanetić (2024-10-23 11:08:05+00:00): Thanks for your comment, I've updated the filed Fee wich was unitentionally checked No
uknown-gryphus (2022-10-11 18:11:42+00:00): Hi, there seem to be some roads that are inside appartment complexes marked with highway=residential. These should be marked with highway=service. Also it appears some of the roads are possibly just walkways for residents, not ways for cars to drive. And the roads intersect with buildings which shouldn't happen
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.