piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:14:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:14:21+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:18:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:14:27+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
literan (2016-12-15 11:07:15+00:00): дом addr:housenumber=6 с21
addr:street=2-я Институтская улица находится согласно адресному реестру в другом месте
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
Владимир К (2017-02-15 11:44:02+00:00): Вы делаете это как-то неправильно. Что значит на точке нет дороги?
Владимир К (2017-02-15 11:44:24+00:00): Зачем столько отношений?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-13 07:43:41+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3264966 ?
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
eggie (2017-10-21 13:23:54+00:00): Volgens mij heb je nooit onze welkomst mail ontvangen met wat nuttige tips. Bij deze...per PB
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
Alouette955 (2016-12-31 19:42:47+00:00): I recently delete links ont this intersection and on Corbusier street due to recent major work. Please don't recreate it again they does not exists anymore.
petrar_telenav (2017-01-03 06:43:05+00:00): Thank you for your correction. I will not add them.
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
mavl (2016-12-15 06:37:35+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы добавили номер дома, но не указали улицу [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198511185].
Номер дома нужно указывать не как "33 а", а "33А" [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr].  
Клиника с названием "Дом", изменённая в этом пакете правок, переименована обратно в "Веда" [http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3682661032/history].
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-16 04:53:46+00:00): [Tunasan] add cafe
mavl (2017-10-20 16:45:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53101418 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44392034].
Rafał Szmitke (RafalSzm) (2016-12-14 15:25:29+00:00): Zgadza się te budynki są rozebrane
gvil (2016-12-14 21:34:21+00:00): kaj se tukaj dogaja?? zakaj se zadeve brišejo?
Hjart (2016-12-14 16:03:21+00:00): When editing in Denmark, please use Geodatastyrelsen imagery (you'll see it in the imagery menu), rather than Bing.
Goffredo (2016-12-16 20:13:56+00:00): Hello Flyerfly, i saw that You changed the tag of "Roggia Castrina" from waterway to former:waterway. This last tag is not documented, what did you meant?
Thanks
flierfy (2016-12-16 21:25:22+00:00): Such a term does not exist indeed. I just didn't want to remove this object yet. So I changed it to former:waterway.
With kind regards,
Stephan
literan (2016-12-15 10:59:26+00:00): в соседнем с запада доме уже нанесен один МФЦ (Красносельского района). Не задвоил?
Владимир К (2017-04-10 09:34:11+00:00): да, задвоил. сейчас поправлю
Danique Mason (2016-12-14 16:07:34+00:00): #shsmaps #changetheworld
maraf24 (2016-12-15 15:24:42+00:00): Co to za dziwne operacje na drogach?
Dlaczego znikają nazwy lub zmieniają się na prawidłowe?
Dlaczego drogi są kasowane a potem tworzone na nowo?
maxerickson (2017-08-01 15:23:25+00:00): A note/comment style opening_hours value should be wrapped in " marks, like:

"During regular open hours"

I also wonder if there is a better way to express such hours (I assume the station is only available when the facility is open?). I don't have any suggestions though.

Thanks,

Max
5m4u9 (2016-12-14 19:38:31+00:00): hi, the names of all elements on this map shouldn't contain the type of business (neighborhood store, pharmacy, hairdresser, etc.).  apps will automatically add the business type ahead of the display name. 

Thanks for improving both hotels, stars, wifi would be good to improve
Habrie (2016-12-14 20:24:14+00:00): Hi,
Ok, thanks for your pointer, will take note of that in the future!
I'll have a look at what number of stars these hotels have on their door, although stars in Bolivia are self-appointed and don't mean a thing really :)
Hjart (2016-12-14 18:58:29+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Vær opmærksom på at veje og stier skal "klikkes" sammen hvor de møder eller krydser hinanden, sådan som beskrevet i pkt. 5 i https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3.1. Ellers kommer navigation ikke til at virke korrekt. Jeg har allerede rettet adskillige tilfælde her.
Constable (2017-02-03 11:39:11+00:00): ciao, immagino che questo nodo (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4554170212) debba avere il civico 18, vero?
Mi sembra un simpatico (vedi "☺") errore di battitura.
grazie per l'ottimo lavoro!
Felipe Alves (2016-12-14 21:26:55+00:00): Oi, Lucas. Não tem mais informações sobre as farmácias, como endereços, ou telefones?
RicoElectrico (2016-12-15 15:23:05+00:00): Hej. Mam prośbę. Jeśli rysujesz prostokątne budynki, wyprostuj ich kąty klawiszem S.
Andreas Binder (2016-12-14 17:54:03+00:00): Falsche Änderungssatzbeschreibung. Sollte "Place-Beschreibung nach Recherche" heißen
trigpoint (2016-12-14 19:23:45+00:00): Hi, did you discuss the removal of the building tags from HMS Belfast anywhere, such as with the GB community?
It is long accepted practice that permanently moored ships are tagged as buildings.  
HMS Belfast is a significant national tourist attraction. I have replaced the tag you have removed.
4b696d (2016-12-14 20:54:12+00:00): I did not discuss anything. All I did was following the rules I found in the wiki which clearly state otherwise, but it is not my object to cause any trouble. In case you have complaints about my other edits please let me know. Don't worry about the ship, I will not touch it again.
scottypop (2016-12-14 18:09:19+00:00): Sorry - Description error - is just a deletion not a new building.
chnav (2016-12-15 03:02:27+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в ОСМ.
Вы начали активно редактировать Тараз, при этом в каждой правке что-то удаляете. Пожалуйста примите во внимание, у нас не принято удалять объекты - если не нравится их геометрия, то её надо исправить в редакторе, а не удалять. ОСМ хранит не только карту, но и всю истоию её создания - кто, где, когда что поменял и исправил. Удаляя объекты вы удаляете их историю (например старые названия и др.)
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
samely (2017-01-06 14:57:08+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
highflyer74 (2016-12-16 09:54:14+00:00): Moin Theyer!

Das können die Worpsweder ja nun langsam wirklich nicht mehr gut machen bei Dir ;-).

Noch ein Tipp: Da Du ja Ortskenntnis hast, verwende doch am besten gleich building=detached, apartments oder house als Hausbezeichnung. building=residential ist laut Wiki nur ein temporärer Wert, der möglichst genauer bezeichnet werden sollte (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dresidential).

Gruss aus HB,

Oliver
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
samely (2017-01-06 14:58:58+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
ybon (2018-09-02 07:21:40+00:00): Ciao dan! :)
Are you sure about the new "Cala Sapone" node?
From my knowledge, it's the name of the beach 1km down from here (and indeed a node exists there).
I understand this name is also used as a "locality", but I wonder why a new node 1 km away from the original beach?
Thanks :)
dan980 (2018-09-02 07:47:03+00:00): Hi, using Osmi-addresses tool (https://github.com/ltog/osmi-addresses) I found out that the "Mercuri Boutique Hotel" was tagged with "addr:place=Cala Sapone", so I created a node next to it. Also the official website uses "Cala Sapone" for the address: https://www.mercuryboutiquehotel.it/contatti-mercury-boutique-hotel.html
ybon (2018-09-03 14:36:16+00:00): Yes, that makes sense, but even the restaurant "Mario e Pinella", which is down the beach, uses "Cala Sapone" as locality in their address: http://www.marioepinella.it/
So I'm tempted to say that the locality is roughly "everything around the beach Cala Sapone", and thus I'm tempted to think the locality node should be down there. :)
What do you think? :)
dan980 (2018-09-08 08:11:18+00:00): Looks reasonable to me
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
msevilla00 (2017-06-28 07:50:49+00:00): Me parece que sobra lo del Aljibe;
name=Aljibe
creo que ahí va más una fuente sin nombre
no?
cronoser (2025-03-06 19:42:52+00:00): lo quito, gracias por avisar.
Roef (2016-12-15 08:59:32+00:00): Een aantal masten staan er nog wel, onder andere voor de zendmasten voor mobiele telefonie. Moeten deze dan niet op de kaart blijven staan?
yzemaze (2016-12-16 20:35:21+00:00): Hi,
ein paar der ways (Straßen) sind nicht miteinander verbunden. Dementsprechend spuckt OSMI ein paar Fehler aus: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=6.41592&lat=51.52785&zoom=16
Der Validator von JOSM dürfte ebenfalls nicht zufrieden gewesen sein.
samely (2017-01-06 14:57:17+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
samely (2017-01-06 14:58:28+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-03 18:46:50+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459635664/history - do you remember what you meant by shop=3 ?
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
samely (2017-01-06 14:56:15+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
samely (2017-01-06 14:57:13+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
samely (2017-01-06 14:59:05+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
Alexey Lukin (2016-12-19 16:57:14+00:00): Hi Samely, your automatic deletions applied to Cambridge, MA, have been working on a bad data entered by an amateur user "margonotmango". Now the user is having trouble reverting her changes because of conflicts with your follow-up deletions. Can you please temporarily revert all your changes to Cambridge, MA, that have happened after December 1, 2016? This will allow us to revert margonotmango's changesets, and then you can go ahead with your script.
The whole east Cambridge is now a mess due to these massive changes.
Thanks.
woodpeck (2016-12-19 19:18:40+00:00): I'll try to fix this with DWG tools.
Alexey Lukin (2016-12-19 19:21:13+00:00): Thanks. Here are some extra details on the problem:

I'd like to report a massive mistake (or a vandalism) that has
happened 2 weeks ago to Cambridge, MA, USA. If you look at street
crossings here, it will become apparent:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/42.36534/-71.08999

In fact, the problem spreads to the bigger part of Cambridge. It
started with a series of changesets by an amateur user 20 days ago
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/margonotmango/history#map=3/41.19/22.58

She has quickly realized her mistakes, but was unable to revert the
series of changesets because of conflicts with the following automatic
scripts that have worked on her bad data after her changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/samely/history#map=3/11.13/11.30
These scripts have made hundreds of deletions to the bad data, which
has complicated the reversals.

Can you help with rolling back the changes of Samely and then rolling
back all the changes or Margonotmango to Cambridge? If this gets too
complicated, could you restore the whole Cambridge to the state of
December 1, please? I believe that the vandalism has happened after
this date.
samely (2016-12-19 20:23:47+00:00): Hi Alexey, thanks for letting me know about this. There is no any automatic script to delete streets, while working on fixing overlapping I notice that there were many relations  in separated lines so I mixed them in just one way.

Woodpeck, thanks for helping to fix this.
Let me know if you need me to revert some changes or just you can do it. Thanks again.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
woodpeck (2016-12-21 00:05:06+00:00): I hope things look a bit better now. samely, I did initially revert many of your changesets so you will have received a bunch of messages, but I had to revert my revert again so most of your edits are still in place (but the problematic ones have been overridden by the margonotmango revert).
samely (2017-01-06 14:55:37+00:00): Woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
samely (2017-01-06 14:57:44+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
samely (2017-01-06 14:56:46+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
tyr_asd (2018-06-29 16:38:27+00:00): Hi. I see you changed the electrification of the the Treviglio-Brescia high speed rail line from 25kV AC to 3kV DC. Is that really correct? Because many sources (e.g. http://www.ferrovie.it/portale/articoli/4400) indicate that it is actually a 25kV AC line (like most of the other newly constructed high speed rail lines in Italy). See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1440324
flierfy (2018-07-05 22:05:17+00:00): Zwischen dem Abzweig Casirate und Brescia sind es wohl 25000 V/50 Hz. Das hab ich jetzt auch dahin gehend geändert.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
samely (2017-01-06 14:56:54+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
samely (2017-01-06 14:59:11+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
Marc_ch (2023-06-23 21:29:52+00:00): Bonjour,
à quelle niveau se trouve le BurgerKing ?
Salutations,
Marc
samely (2017-01-06 14:56:08+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
samely (2017-01-06 14:58:20+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
samely (2017-01-06 14:56:41+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
Komadinovic Vanja (2020-11-12 10:40:35+00:00): Takodje,

Deluje da je ova ruta duplikat, segment vece rute ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6791194 ). Da li bi imalo smisla obrisati ovu i drugu duplikat rutu i ostaviti samo https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6791194?
user_5359 (2016-12-14 21:32:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! you add an address to the boundary of Compton Lakes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/170662). A address ist part of a entry or building.

I have revert your changeset.
R0bst3r (2016-12-15 15:03:02+00:00): Hallo Jonas Michael Schneider.
Willkommen bei OSM!

Bei dieser Änderung hast du zusätzlich einen Zaun auf ein Gebäude verschoben. Ich hab den Zaun wieder richtig platziert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44425633.

Viel Spaß noch.
samely (2017-01-06 14:57:25+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
samely (2017-01-06 14:58:31+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.
Prince Kassad (2016-12-18 22:17:30+00:00): Hallo, die Änderung des Logo-Getränkemarkts in Erlensee war leider Käse. Die Bing-Bilder sind hier nämlich veraltet, das Gebäude wurde neu gebaut und erheblich vergrößert. So wie ich es geändert hatte, stimmt es auch in der Realität.
HoloDuke (2017-02-16 15:00:15+00:00): Hallo, ich habe die den Changesetkommentar leider erst sehr spät gesehen. Da hatte ich die Änderung am Logo Getränkemarkt schon zum 2. Mal durchgeführt... Hatte mich zwar gewundert, dachte mit dem upload wäre etwas schief gegangen. Wenn ich den Kommentar früher gesehen hätte wäre es mir wohl gleich klar gewesen, dass die Änderungen rückgängig gemacht wurden. Sorry nochmal für die Umstände, war keine Absicht
Tomas Straupis (2016-12-14 22:05:51+00:00): Reverting change and marking as intentional corruption of data.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 23:09:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44553573 where the changeset comment is: some fixes related to clean-up after accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
samely (2017-01-06 14:58:03+00:00): woodpeck, thanks for helping to repair this area and for considering my edits, I will take a look so I can contribute to improving this area.