piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
DressyPear4 (2022-06-06 03:56:43+00:00): Adicione um comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Há vários avisos de vias sobrepostas, corrija antes de enviar para o servidor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121857332
richlv (2022-06-07 10:22:48+00:00): Hi, in the changeset comment you talk about entrances and living streets.
In Latvia, only roads, explicitly marked with the living street sign, are marked as living_street - this was discussed and agreed upon years ago. Luckily, even documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines#Ielu_apz%C4%ABm%C4%93%C5%A1ana_apdz%C4%ABvot%C4%81s_viet%C4%81s :)
HellMap (2022-06-07 11:11:22+00:00): It was? Hmmm. Thanks for letting me know about this.

This looks like a rather recent change on the wiki then as of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Lv:Latvian_tagging_guidelines&diff=2187729&oldid=2147581. I specifically checked this point on wiki and in practice years ago. The main page for living street has always said a variant of "[..] or other implementations of shared space". This is what I saw already tagged too, at least in East Riga. And currently pretty much all courtyard roads I have checked are tagged as living streets in Riga regardless if they have the living zone sign. So I have continued doing this myself and this changeset is definitely not the only one where I tagged living streets for courtyards. I guess I have to check a lot of stuff now.

Personally, I don't really agree with tagging them as service roads because OSM is basically missing a road classification for countries with courtyard-specific countries, which is like all of Soviet bloc as far as I know. But I will follow the tagging convention. But my question is how do we tag all the courtyard rules to essentially match those of living streets? Stuff like pedestrian right of way, for example. How are routers supposed to tell them apart?
richlv (2022-06-07 15:38:16+00:00): Yeah, that one was mostly clarification, as it did say "{{Tag|highway|living_street}} - ceļi, kas apzīmēti ar ceļazīmi "Dzīvojamā zona"." before.
It has been discussed since 2010 at least, with some consensus a few years later, but somehow the wikipage did not get updated. Looks like a lot of Latvia-related wikipages need some love :)

The question on the traffic rules would fit in talk-lv or the Signal group at https://signal.group/#CjQKIBQDZFRYENhgTzY0czaSnYxt6-NCXdW5Rp2o6144bO4wEhCUSXKPmsjKnTbzUgLj0MpL .
user_5359 (2022-06-03 16:41:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1066170899. What is the meaning of the tags
khadriala = aaa
kharka = haha
?
Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
Rajwali baig (2022-06-03 17:07:11+00:00): Oh it was a mistake I correct it
user_5359 (2022-06-03 18:03:13+00:00): Same question again: What ist the meaning of the tag
khadriala=village
kharka=village
Please use for the keys explicitly British English.
Rajwali baig (2022-06-03 18:19:56+00:00): Actually, khadriala is the name of a village 
tell me what i can use
Rajwali baig (2022-06-03 18:23:09+00:00): tell me what can I use for this?
user_5359 (2022-06-03 18:24:33+00:00): we use key=value not value=key. What is the right name of the village khadriala or addr:city=Khadariala (notice the additional a between drill)? Did you know the key prefix is_in: ?
Rajwali baig (2022-06-03 18:37:05+00:00): no i have no idea
Rajwali baig (2022-06-03 18:44:21+00:00): tell me about this
user_5359 (2022-06-03 18:52:37+00:00): Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is_in
Rajwali baig (2022-06-04 04:44:05+00:00): is this right now?
user_5359 (2022-06-04 05:13:07+00:00): I am not sure about the City and Village, but the keys are entered correctly.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
FraukeLeo (2023-06-10 07:26:40+00:00): Hi Tugman, in this edit you turned the entire path into a bridge. This obviously not the case so I removed the bridge tagging again and put some short bridges in according to the aerial image.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:20:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
DressyPear4 (2022-06-06 03:56:50+00:00): Adicione um comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Há vários avisos de vias sobrepostas, corrija antes de enviar para o servidor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121858126
Jakka (2022-06-03 06:55:03+00:00): De bridge construction it self could have then name "Soldatenbrug" and the highway could be "Veerpont"
Database "Loket voor Authenthieke Registratie" confirms this.
Jakka (2022-06-03 07:27:14+00:00): https://inventaris.onroerenderfgoed.be/erfgoedobjecten/216479
VLD549 (2022-06-13 11:25:06+00:00): Thanks for confirming the name change on the bridge to 'Soldatenbrug'.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
ivanbranco (2022-06-10 15:51:09+00:00): Hi Rajwali,

please note that names need to be proper names, not descriptions. So we can't name a farmland "Farmland" as we can't name a bench with name=Bench ecc.

Please read: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-06-03 01:55:29+00:00): a linha 1066174798 está mal construída, peço que a corrija, pergunto tambem qual a fonte dos dados mapeados pois a enorme quantidade faz suspeitar de possível spam, os mesmos não se encontram precisamente mapeados com alguns erros
topolusitania (2022-06-04 16:11:28+00:00): Olá
A linha já foi corrigida pelo FVGordon, https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/FvGordon. Tratava-se apenas de dois poligonos que se sobrepunham. Nada de grave como erro...
Se te deres ao trabalho de verificar o passado do Daniel Nunes, em vez de fazeres perguntas que podem conter insinuações graves, verás que é mapeador desde 2019, nos últimos 3 meses tem mais ou menos o mesmo número de actualizações que tu, usa apenas o iD para mapear com base nas fotos de PT disponíveis no iD, melhor geolocalizadas que as fotos Bing que tu normalmente usas.
Por ultimo, no OSM há, como faltas graves, a importação não autorizada e o vandalismo. Nenhuma destas se aplica ao Daniel Nunes, cujo trabalho agradeço desde já, quer pela correcção, quer por completar lacunas na zona de Lisboa.
Cumprimentos
TL
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
EneaSuper (2022-06-09 07:33:34+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che adesso ci sono due elementi che indicano la stazione ferroviaria di Pontedecimo.

Io desidererei che venisse lasciato il mio, anche perché non tutta l'area indicata è accessibile ai passeggeri. Inoltre ci potrebbero essere problemi di routing.

Fammi sapere 🙂
camminatoreseriale (2022-06-09 15:49:33+00:00): Ciao! :-)
Scusami ma non trovo i due elementi doppi, ho paura d'essere un po' stordito oggi belin! ;-) C'è la stazione e i vari binari, o vedo male? Indicameli un pochino, per favore. Grazie! [in generale comunque gli edit di questo tipo sono sempre riguardanti tag mancanti/obbligatori/obsoleti per risolvere conflitti fra tag ed evitare errori nella renderizzazione ;) ]
ivanbranco (2022-06-09 16:52:53+00:00): Ci sono due stazioni "Genova Pontedecimo", una taggata come nodo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/59476367
e una taggata come way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/462854802
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
woodpeck_repair (2023-12-14 09:33:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145103843 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits einer Sockenpuppe des gesperrten beautifulplaces, s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15368
redd (2022-06-05 07:57:40+00:00): Hallo Msch2311,
dein Änderungskommentar besteht nur aus einem Punkt. Dort soll eigentlich stehen, was der Umfang der Änderung sein soll und die Quelle für das Wissen.
Das kannst du gerne hier als Kommentar nachtragen. In Zukunft bitte besser darauf achten.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
literan (2022-06-25 08:54:38+00:00): ну и зачем вы тут дорожку удалили, сломали роутинг?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=55.84988%2C37.43087%3B55.85001%2C37.43195#map=18/55.84991/37.43048&layers=N

рисуйте свои платформы отдельно, но дорожки не трогайтие, они в этом месте не прерываются. Люди, которые по ней идут мимо остановки, продолжают идти по дорожке.

верну корректный тег дорожек
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
woodpeck_repair (2023-12-14 09:33:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 145103843 where the changeset comment is: revert von edits einer Sockenpuppe des gesperrten beautifulplaces, s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15368
Danchev (2022-06-13 12:09:43+00:00): Please respect https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Geofreund1 (2024-06-10 15:26:21+00:00): Hallo Harald,
im Kurpark Bad Liebenzell gibt es eine Musikbühne, die du mit bandshell getagged hast. bandshell ist im Wiki unbekannt. Vielleicht passt leisure=bandstand besser?
fx99 (2024-06-11 08:47:56+00:00): Nachdem leisure=bandstand im Wiki aufgeführt ist und die Funktion gut beschreibt, habe ich das hinzugefügt. 
building=bandshell gibt es lt. taginfo ein paar Mal und beschreibt die Form des Bebäudes.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:20:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:20:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Filip009 (2022-06-02 17:52:05+00:00): Moja chyba :)
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
RHEast (2022-06-02 20:22:31+00:00): Has it been impossible to find a name for this waterway?
Paul Berry (2022-06-02 22:44:52+00:00): No trace seems to exist on any public domain mapping I can find. If you know otherwise, even if it's a name only in local use and not signed anywhere, please let me know.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
user_5359 (2022-06-03 16:20:23+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9790925318, http://www.osm.org/node/9790925218 and https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:fuel. What ist your understanding of the value petrol,Diesal. if Diesal means diesel,  use fuel:diesel = yes.
Корм (2022-06-02 17:00:34+00:00): бред
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
user_5359 (2022-06-03 16:55:18+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/342116654. What is the meaning of the tag name:bo_alt = གསེར་ཁྲི་ ? Did you mean alt_name:bo = གསེར་ཁྲི་?
NMYR (2022-07-30 21:19:30+00:00): Hi!

I did mean alt_name:bo. My bad. I will make the change.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:20:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-06-23 07:13:58+00:00): What is the source of this edit?
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
smarko21 (2022-06-03 10:00:32+00:00): Test comment
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
PT-53 (2022-06-03 05:15:55+00:00): Hallo Msch2311,
Du hast den Spielplatz am falschen Standort eingezeichnet. Dort ist ein Regenrückhaltebecken.
Ich habe den Spielplatz an den richtigen Standort verschoben.
Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Msch2311 (2022-06-03 06:23:26+00:00): okay vielen dank dafür
PT-53 (2022-06-03 08:00:34+00:00): Also ohne eigene Kontrolle.

Ich mache sowas nur, wenn ich eigene Ortskenntnisse habe bzw. nach eigener Ortsbesichtigung.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-09 01:06:08+00:00): Hello,

Welcome to OSM!

I have replaced the construction area with two residential areas based on how they appear on Esri World Imagery (Esri looks like it's newer than most other imagery for this location.)

I also removed the ponds and drain you added in this changeset as they appear to conflict with that same Esri imagery - it looks like there are houses built where the water you added is/was.
porfiriopaiz (2022-06-04 19:58:57+00:00): Please, when adding the species of a tree, use the correct casing on the word:

Instead of "species = eucalyptus", please use "species = Eucalyptus"

See the difference? get the idea?

Regards,
Porfirio
mariotomo (2022-06-04 21:12:12+00:00): it's established botanic norm, to give Genus epithet with Capital initial, species epithet in lower case. The Upper Case rule goes for all epithets of ranks down to Section, while epithets at rank below section go in lower letter.

apart from "it looks better", casing is relevant for many search engines.
mariotomo (2022-06-04 21:54:09+00:00): hé, ça que vous avais fait ici, c'est pire que d'ajouter de nouvelles informations en utilisant un mauvais format : ici, vous avez supprimé des informations correctement formatées, en les remplaçant par des déchets : espèces scientifiques par nom vernaculaire dans la balise "species".
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121861815
mariotomo (2022-06-04 22:28:04+00:00): I don't understand what is going on here … I'm looking at node 9773097146, initially identified as species=Tuyas orientales (spelling mistake for Thuya orientalis, a non accepted synonym of Platycladus orientalis) and proper individual name "Ciprés". 
porfiriopaiz tried to help, correcting the scientific name to the proper accepted binomial, and removing the proper name.
the original editor "corrected", removing the correction, and setting 'species' to 'cipres'.
now it becomes even more curious, because what is porfiriopaiz doing, translating again to a different species?

can the initial mapper please get in contact?  the goal is a better map, and if you have access to first hand information, we are only trying to help you state what you mean so that we understand it.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121861815
mariotomo (2022-06-08 18:58:32+00:00): Plan Verde UNI: you have used the names "Palma real", "palmera real", "palmera botella", and have given these to the two keys "name" and "species".  You should choose one, and assign it to the key "species:es" or if the same tree has several vernacular names, you may consider adding all of these names in the value for "species:es", and separate them names by semicolon ':'.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Glassman (2022-06-03 21:46:08+00:00): #TIP: When deleting building - save the address to a node - it will likely be reused when a new house is built.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121862089
haukep (2022-06-02 20:07:20+00:00): Hallo! Die Form von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110330766 sieht sehr spezifisch aus. Aus welcher Quelle hast du diese Form? Hintergrund der Frage: Bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/110330766 ist noch das Attribut "source=bing" hinterlegt - was aber nach dieser Änderung vermutlich ja nicht mehr zutreffend ist.
chrki (2022-06-03 06:00:00+00:00): Hi, die Form kommt aus dem NRW ALKIS, nachdem ich auch den südlich angrenzenden Hof etwas nachgezeichnet hatte. War im Nachhinein nicht ganz so klug, das stimmt. Ich hab nochmal gemäß Luftbild etwas geändert und das  source=bing Attribut nun entfernt.
WoSoe (2022-06-02 18:18:26+00:00): Hallo Neb the B,
ich verstehe das area:highway Mapping an den linearen highways nicht.
Warum kein einfaches »width« am Weg oder Straße? Siehe:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width#Width_of_streets
Neb the B (2022-06-12 18:25:35+00:00): Kreuzungen sind besser zu erstellen. Insbesondere wenn unterschiedliche Wege für unterschiedliche belange wie Rollstuhl oder ähnliches eingezeichnet werden.
Verläufe von Straßen lassen sich so auch besser darstellen.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:21:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
PT-53 (2022-06-03 05:21:10+00:00): Hallo Msch2311,
anhand welcher Quellen / Infos hast Du das Notruftelefon verschoben?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Msch2311 (2022-06-03 06:22:19+00:00): vom Hinweis 3200913
PT-53 (2022-06-04 05:42:41+00:00): Also ohne eigene Überprüfung.
Ich mache so was nur ncah eigener Kontrolle vor Ort.
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
Jakuje (2022-06-02 19:09:18+00:00): Dobry den, proc jste zde zmenila ostruvek na ostrov, kdyz popis odpovida ostruvku (ostrov <1km2) a proc jste z nej odstranila les, kdyz je evidentne pokryty lesem podle Bing map?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:place%3Dislet
DressyPear4 (2022-06-06 03:56:56+00:00): Adicione um comentário para que outros possam entender o que você está modificando
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Há vários avisos de vias sobrepostas, corrija antes de enviar para o servidor.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/121862409
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
mavl (2022-06-09 13:22:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 122164476 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping].
eggie (2024-08-23 20:00:36+00:00): Beste Padvinder.. Lopen hier nu werkelijke landbouwtracks over die weilanden? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.341673/4.643730

MVG
eggie
RHEast (2022-06-02 17:56:33+00:00): What do you think about stubs like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1024849989 ?