piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jordi MF (2020-10-20 11:53:23+00:00): Hola,
En primer lloc, gràcies per millorar les dades d'OSM. Des de la comunitat d'usuaris hem vist que has afegit una senda (senda Cantallops) per damunt d'una senda ja existent. És a dir, has duplicat una informació que pot portar a errors d'enrutament. ambé has utilitzat una etiqeuta no vàlida (senda=pedregosa). Existeixen etiquetes per a indicar com és la superfície (surface=*). Si vols afegir el nom no oficial d'una senda, però que és utilitzat per usuaris MTB, existeix l'etiqueta mtb:name=*. Tampoc és correcte escriure name=Sender per al nom d'un sender. En l'etiqueta "name" només poden anar els noms oficials d'un Punt d'Interés. El nom "sender" és descriptiu i redundant.
Ho corregiré. Si tens dubtes, pots consultar la wiki d'OpenStreetMap o preguntar a la comunitat d'usuaris d'OpenStreetMap de Telegram o a la llista talk-es: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
Salutacions,
Jordi
Vinber-Pro (2020-10-21 14:50:43+00:00): Bonjour,
Espace curiste semble être en dehors du batiment, est-ce normal ?
Vincent
ralley (2020-10-20 04:19:54+00:00): What is the source for this change?  The changeset lists only the LINZ aerial imagery in which the name is not visible.  Both the Auckland Council website (https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/rubbish-recycling/Pages/recycle-organisation.aspx?ListItemId=113) and the sign OTG spell it "Waitākere"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92714129
user_11703314 (2020-10-20 05:53:32+00:00): I based this on the sign posted at the entrance (that's what "OTG" means)
ralley (2020-10-20 07:20:04+00:00): https://openstreetcam.org/details/3165222
ndm (2020-10-19 23:23:35+00:00): A more detailed changeset comment would be helpful for other local mappers.
DaveF (2020-10-20 15:37:08+00:00): Deleted woodland
wireguy (2020-10-19 15:44:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM MapAndChisel!
I looked at mapbox and nj2015 aerial imagery and updated the house outline.
Ping me if you have any q's.
Max-Kritic (2020-10-19 18:49:05+00:00): Interface de génération de fichiers .osm à partir du cadastre
Ce service et les données du cadastre disponibles ici sont exclusivement réservés à l'usage des contributeurs OpenStreetMap. En savoir plus https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Cadastre_Fran%C3%A7ais/Conditions_d%27utilisation

http://cadastre.openstreetmap.fr/
parsd51 (2020-10-19 14:44:57+00:00): Hej osmviborg

Hvad bruger du til at tegne/justere de foreslåede veje/områder?
Vel ikke et DAR kort jeg har overset......eller er det bare ønsketænkning....

Jeg har JOSM plug-in PicLayer, men jeg kan ikke få justeringen til at virke.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/PicLayer

Der er nu to stier oven i hinanden, skulle de proposed ikke bare forbindes til den eksisterende sti?

Hilsen
parsd51
osmviborg (2020-10-19 15:16:53+00:00): PicLayer & lokalplan. Om proposed er forbundet til noget, eller ej, er vel ligemeget.
parsd51 (2020-10-19 16:18:33+00:00): Tak for hjælpen - det var åbenbart det der skulle til for at finde det manglende “flueben“ :-)

Øh, hvorfor så slette noget der er forbundet?
osmviborg (2020-10-19 17:51:46+00:00): Brug revert hvis du vil.
parsd51 (2020-10-19 19:00:14+00:00): Så vigtigt er det ikke for mig, jeg undrede mig bare og der bliver nok rettet på det når ortofoto ‘21 kommer om ikke før.... :-)
Jeg prøver generelt set at bevare historien, men er (u)heldigvis ikke perfekt :-)

Men nu behøver du forhåbentlig ikke rette min øjemålstegninger :-)
Eller havde du, som det tit sker for mig, det hele klar til upload og så har osmviborg allerede rettet det......
ndm (2020-10-19 23:23:01+00:00): https://www.eonenergy.com/Login
DaveF (2020-10-20 15:33:03+00:00): Why have you deleted woods & hedges?
javbw (2021-06-06 04:12:33+00:00): level crossing points points are disconnected from the railways and all should be deleted. 

The ones in my area are all duplicates as well, and unnecessary.
javbw (2021-06-13 11:43:25+00:00): Still finding garbage data.

This changeset should be deleted.
Vinber-Pro (2020-10-21 10:29:01+00:00): Bonjour Julie,
content de voir tous les ajouts que vous faites.
Peut-être faire attention, il semble que vous ayez ajouté des building=yes, qu'une autre contributrice a corrigé ensuite, c'est bien le principe. Cependant si vous pouvez ne pas les ajouter au départ, cela permettra d'éviter une autre modif derrière.

Exemple ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860701804/history

Disponible pour en discuter.

Bonne journée
DaveF (2020-10-21 15:16:29+00:00): Hi
All UK railway station have been mapped.
Pawcio (2020-10-19 18:36:39+00:00): It is not just a normal pavement for pedestrians, because of its remoteness it is shared with cyclists and it is also designed for cyclists. Pity you ignore the question whether such tagging adds any value for the path users.
GinaroZ (2020-10-19 20:12:51+00:00): In what way is it designed for cyclists?
And what value does tagging it bicycle=yes add for the path users when it is neither a core path or a shared use path?
Pawcio (2020-10-20 08:33:40+00:00): 1) It is wide enough, like the signed cycleway on SE. At crossings kerbs are low.
2) In some renders it can be shown as good for cycling. It may be taken into account by routers like BRouter.
So what value does your tagging add for the path users?
Max-Kritic (2020-10-21 06:33:14+00:00): Première modification. Première erreur.
Voir http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#username=alex_hnqz

Si j'ai le temps, je referai des importations des building du cadastre.
dieterv (2020-10-19 17:16:39+00:00): Hoi Joost,

'k Had daar inderdaad geen rekening mee gehouden, bedankt voor de correctie !
ndm (2020-10-19 23:23:43+00:00): A more detailed changeset comment would be helpful for other local mappers.
MrManny (2021-03-24 14:55:25+00:00): Aus reinem Interesse, wobei handelt es sich um "Round Table 10 Tree"?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2024-04-29 22:46:15+00:00): via não parece existir: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8022289280
DressyPear4 (2020-10-19 16:29:20+00:00): Olá, não é correto adicionar uma área genérica como industrial ou residencial.
O "landuse=industrial" seria nos limites do terreno de uma determinada empresa, e é nessa área onde são colocados os nomes, já nas edificações seriam identificados os setores etc.
Se alguém fosse identificar as empresas nessa área estaria colocando "landuse" dentro de "landuse" o que não é correto.
O mesmo acontece com "residential" e "retail".
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92715765
Maria Paula Simonette (2020-10-19 17:45:43+00:00):  Olá, @DressyPear4! Eu preciso fazer a delimitação da mancha urbana no município de Aparecida de Goiânia. Eu estava usando as etiquetas de uso residencial e industrial. Qual seria o caminho adequado para representar a mancha urbana?
DressyPear4 (2020-10-19 18:20:03+00:00): Mancha urbana não sei o que significa nem se há atributos a isso no Openstretmap, conheço apenas as limitações que são feitas em bairros usando relações aos objetos existentes como nesse exemplo
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6870173#map=14/-16.6406/-49.3105
(O que pode ser um pouco complicado para mapeadores não experientes)
O melhor seria questionar com a comunidade, pelo fórum ou canal no telegram.
santamariense (2020-10-19 22:29:05+00:00): Não estou bem lembrado, mas tem uma maneira de mapear a área urbana que não pela tag landuse=residential e é pouco utilizada. Acho que é boundary=urban + type=boundary.
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/boundary=urban
Mas seria bom conversar com a comunidade mesmo. As vezes se puder explicar a finalidade do porque tu quer mapear essa, talvez se trilhe caminhos diferentes para se alcançar o objetivo.
ndm (2020-10-19 23:23:53+00:00): A more detailed changeset comment would be helpful for other local mappers.
ndm (2020-10-19 23:22:48+00:00): Changeset comment is bizarre -- presumably this needs reverting?
user_5359 (2020-10-23 16:29:42+00:00): Hello! Waht is the meaning of the key openp? See (as eample) https://www.osm.org/node/8022322325. Did you mean openplaques:id?
trigpoint (2020-10-23 16:50:41+00:00): I believe that this tag should be openplaques:id rather than openp.

Cheers Phil
Palgrave Peter (2020-10-24 14:44:51+00:00): Yes it should be openplaques:id. Thanks for spotting the typo.
user_5359 (2020-10-24 15:54:01+00:00): I updated also the other seven nodes ...
Palgrave Peter (2020-10-24 16:12:07+00:00): Thanks - how did you find them as I cant see a way to do it?
user_5359 (2020-10-24 20:34:20+00:00): I found the typo on http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm. To get the objects with this key openp is use a Overpass-Turbo query (follow the link behind the (O): http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ZmV.
glostis (2020-11-30 09:53:14+00:00): Hi,
I see that in this changeset you have created a new relation for the Bretagne peninsula (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11771931) with an arbitrary new "border" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/860713641) even though there already exists a relation for the Bretagne peninsula (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5687071) which properly follows the official definition of the Bretagne region by the French government.
Could you please explain the rationale behind this change?
Petr Fukátko (2020-11-30 10:41:05+00:00): Hi.
Relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5687071 represents administrative region Brittany. 
New relation I've made https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11771931 represents geographical unit - peninsula. Those two entities are not identical. Significant part of administrative region Brittany is inland.
eggie (2020-10-19 15:29:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Probeer op de bestaande adresnode bij te taggen. Dus niet nogmaals een adres aanmaken.

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-19 16:10:06+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
gr eggie
blackboxlogic (2020-10-21 01:38:02+00:00): It looks like you deleted the element which had amenity=fuel (NODE: 1637324221, near WAY: 860717750) but didn't replace it. The satellite imagery still looks like a gas station there.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92717016
DuhC0mmunity (2020-10-21 01:46:22+00:00): If your talking about the gas station at 146 Civic Center Dr They took it just recently: https://www.google.com/maps/@44.3394633,-69.7921945,3a,75y,313.22h,90.49t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipOPfbM6kdgDTihh_wP6FXDu-45oICUQ9UUS56R-!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipOPfbM6kdgDTihh_wP6FXDu-45oICUQ9UUS56R-%3Dw203-h100-k-no-pi-0-ya158.48311-ro0-fo100!7i4608!8i2108
eggie (2020-10-19 15:33:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Review.. Wanneer paden een weg kruisen.. maak dan altijd een verbindingsnode.
warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway 	3


MVG,
Eggie
JASMein03M (2020-10-19 15:43:22+00:00): Sorry, ik snap je review niet helemaal.
Bedoel je dat ik een verbindingspunt ben vergeten te maken? Of dat ik in plaats van oversteekpunten een verbindingspunt moet maken?
eggie (2020-10-19 15:48:57+00:00): Zat even te kijken. Het fzuidelijke fietspad heb ik even verlegd.
Het kruist het vlak area=yes highway=pedestrian. Daar dus een verbinding maken.
eggie (2020-10-19 15:49:11+00:00): .. op twee plaatsen.
eggie (2020-10-19 15:49:56+00:00): Verder hoeft foot=yes niet op een voetgangersoversteek plaats
eggie (2020-10-19 16:08:18+00:00): crossing ways heb ik opgelost.. 
Dat zat 'm in het voetgangersgebied
foot=yes heb ik verwijderd van de zebra's. 
gr eggie
GinaroZ (2020-10-19 20:37:39+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. I've merged the details from this node you added as it was duplicate of the building.
Puxan (2020-10-20 17:01:43+00:00): hay que ajustar más los edificios a lo que debe ser la base del mismo, habitualmente rectangular. No olvides escuadrar los edificios.   Muy bien, sigue mapeando.    Joaquim
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92717428
DressyPear4 (2020-10-19 15:47:56+00:00): Como pode ser uma área verde se há construções nesse local?
Não adicione o que não existe.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92717464
user_2066394 (2020-10-19 21:28:16+00:00): Kann eigenständig erfasst werden:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours:covid19
TheMinefighter (2020-10-20 05:52:19+00:00): Danke, kannte ich nicht, nutz ich nächtes mal.
eggie (2020-10-19 15:37:12+00:00): Dag JASmeijn  Je hebt hier adressen gecombineerd.. zie..
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92717776

Dat is niet de bedoeling.
Waarom zou je een huizenblok verplaatsen?
Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster.
Ze zijn precies ingemeten.
Ik draai deze changeset even terug.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-10-19 15:40:56+00:00): reverted by changeset  #92718119

De adressen zijn hersteld (import Kadaster)

Svp geen gebouwen verplaatsen. Ze liggen precies goed. Niet naar de daken kijken!
Daar staat het gebouw niet. het is een schuin genomen luchtfoto.
MVG,
eggie
JASMein03M (2020-10-19 15:48:04+00:00): Ohhhhhh. Oké bedankt! Ik zal geen gebouwen meer verplaatsen nu ik dit weet.

En adressen combineren is ook niet bedoeling of wel?
eggie (2020-10-19 15:57:45+00:00): Nop...  Dan zijn ze niet goed meer te vinden... en alle gebouwen kloppen tot op de cm hier.
JASMein03M (2020-10-19 15:59:09+00:00): Ok
jemily1 (2020-10-19 19:24:35+00:00): Acabo de darme cuenta de que estás editando los nombres de las calles en la ciudad de Alicante, y tras ver algunos cambios tuyos te comunico que:

- los nombres de las calles en la ciudad de Alicante y en cualquier población que tenga placas en castellano y catalán, en la casilla nombre, tienen que ponerse con un espacio entre la barra / y cada nombre, es decir: Avenida Conde Lumiares / Avinguda Comte Lumiares; acabo de revisar esta avenida y algunas calles más de Alicante que también has añadido nombre bilingüe, y parece que lo has hecho igual, sin espacio, por lo que cuando puedas cámbialos de la forma aquí explicada 
-  entre las calles Ghandi y Zarandieta has marcado 2 jardines como plaza, que yo los marcaría como jardines (leisure=garden) y les quitaría el nombre, ya que los jardines no suelen llevar nombre, y se lo pondría a la rotonda que hay a los 2 lados de Conde Lumiares, que se llama Glorieta Tomás Ramírez; en este caso, al ser totalmente iguales los nombres español y catalán se le pone sólo 1 de los nombres, además de las etiquetas bilingües

Yo llevo desde el 10 de mayo haciendo ediciones por los barrios de la zona norte, mayoritariamente aceras, pasos peatonales y corrección de nombres incorrectos

- Por último, aquí te dejo un interesante link sobre la forma de nombrado de calles en osm: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_etiquetado_espa%C3%B1olas
editant (2020-10-20 16:05:43+00:00): Gracias por la información, ya estoy corrigiendo los espacios de la barra. Los jardines ya estaban puestos como plaza.
jemily1 (2020-10-19 19:39:11+00:00): he corregido el nombre de Calle Mayor, poniendo un espacio entre la / y los 2 nombres - Calle Gerona y cualquier otra calle que hayas puesto nombre multilingüe deben ponerse igual
eggie (2020-11-25 18:18:37+00:00): Nu edits in Nederland daarom alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2020-10-19 15:45:33+00:00): Dag JASmein Ga svp niets aan wegen veranderen waar al die OV routes overheen lopen. Het wordt allemaal nauwgezet bijgehouden door experts die precies weten wat ze doen. geen beginnerswerk. 
MVG,
Eggie
JASMein03M (2020-10-19 15:51:33+00:00): Sorry, als ik wat heb veranderd aan de OV routes, dat was niet mijn bedoeling. Het enige wat ik wilde doen was de oude voetgangers oversteekplek weghalen.
eggie (2020-10-19 15:56:55+00:00): Nee .. er is geen schade.. Die routes lopen in het midden.
Even uit voorzorg meegedeeld. 
De boel actueel houden is alleen maar oke.
compdude (2021-03-27 22:56:58+00:00): Is this road still closed?
OneC (2021-05-14 13:17:17+00:00): Hey compdude, which street are you referring to?
compdude (2021-05-14 14:21:25+00:00): I'm referring to all the ones tagged as access=no currently.
OneC (2021-05-14 15:56:10+00:00): updated to be less restrictive: previous was access=no and vehicles=yes; adjusted to access=yes and foot=no and bicycle=no
Alex_457 (2020-11-07 13:44:23+00:00): source: bustimes.org
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-09 06:47:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51980259/history - note that you linked plant wikidata entry

I have not figured out how to fix it so I removed it
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-09 06:47:55+00:00): (well, removing is also a fix in this case)
mdelatorre (2020-10-21 19:02:03+00:00): Hello. Thank you for adding information from México to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92719186
mueschel (2020-10-22 11:55:44+00:00): Kannst du hier noch den richtigen Socket-Typ eintragen? 'type' muss ersetzt werden in the 3 Tags.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8022446029
MrTiVor (2020-10-19 16:20:19+00:00): Отмените этот пакет правок
mavl (2020-10-20 02:40:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет объекты, которые существуют на местности. Объекты можно удалять из OpenStreetMap, если они больше не существуют.
Изменения, сделанные в этом пакете пакете правок, отменены.  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
MrTiVor (2020-10-22 08:47:37+00:00): Что там существует? Мемориал тарайковскому? Как там мемориал? Никакой значимости оно не имеет. Что ещё за квартал солидарности? Где он официально зарегистрирован вообще?
belarus_member (2020-10-27 04:13:21+00:00): На месте гибели Тарайковского создан народный мемориал. После ухода гражданина А. Г. Лукашенко с самозахваченной должности президента мемориал будет воздвигнут на постоянной основе.
Квартал Солидарности существует по соглашению жителей квартала. Ты там не проживаешь поэтому проходи мимо
marc__marc (2020-12-03 15:20:45+00:00): Bonjour,
est-il bien positionné ?
car la poste renseigne le bureau à cette position https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4464854247
J'ignore laquelle des 2 positions est bonne
Cordialement,
Marc
Laïdi (2020-12-03 15:59:07+00:00): il y en a un pour le courrier normal.
Et l'autre pour récupérer et déposer les colis/recommandés.
marc__marc (2020-12-03 16:02:23+00:00): merci pour votre retour.
pourriez-vous rajouter l'information dans la clef description de chacun d'eux ?
xmd5a (2020-10-19 18:37:09+00:00): Добрый день. Добавив этот полигон вы продублировали все перевалы, по которым он проходит. Теперь в OSM два перевала Мырды, Балк-Баши и пр. Просьба исправить данные.
xmd5a (2020-10-20 19:35:57+00:00): Ваши правки можно расценивать как вандальные. Удалил все ваши дубликаты peak и mountain_pass (165 штук)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92787644
Пожалуйста, проверяйте что вы заливаете в OSM!
BCNorwich (2020-10-19 17:11:18+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I just wanted to point out this wiki page:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course,  it shows OSM practice for tagging a golf course.

Surface=grass is the correct tag, tagging landuse=grass is duplication and anyway the land is not used for growing grass it's for playing golf.

I can't figure out why you are making lots of relations, especially when the relation types are not tagged, please see here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation for relation types. There's not even a need for the overall multipolygon. 

May I respectfully suggest you look at how a few other golf courses have been tagged.

If you need any help please just ask, Regards Bernard.
hirafu (2020-10-19 17:58:08+00:00): thanks for the feedback, have made the amendments as suggested.
BCNorwich (2020-10-19 18:46:23+00:00): Glad to help, looks real good well done.
hirafu (2020-10-19 19:28:09+00:00): Bernard, question - after moving it to surface=grass from landuse, the holes have disappeared for me on the standard view. The data is still there though as I can see it when I go into edit mode. Shall I change it back or is it a case of the standard viewer not rendering it correctly? Thanks for the help.
BCNorwich (2020-10-21 08:20:37+00:00): Hi, There is nothing wrong with the tagging as it is now and it ought to remain as such. Any alteration would be incorrect tagging for the purposes of a particular visual rendering. Rather the rendering should be altered to give a particular visual effect.

The problem with the rendering you see, that gives the impression of features disappearing, is that greens, tees and fairways are rendered the same colour. Especially the fact that the green is mapped atop the fairway and both are grass, the same colour. 

I've made a test on hole two removing the surface tag to see how that renders, please give it a while.
BCNorwich (2020-10-21 08:36:54+00:00): Hi, I broke off to look for a render style that shows what I'm trying to say. Please look here:- https://www.openstreetmap.de/karte.html?zoom=16&lat=51.57261&lon=0.0385&layers=B000TT  I hope you'll see your golf features rendered nicely as you've tagged them. It's the render style that counts.

Regards Bernard.
limes11 (2020-10-19 20:01:40+00:00): Hallo Schmandt, 

vielen Dank fuer die Aktualisierungen in Bad Godesberg. 

Koenntest du noch einmal drueber schauen und die Telefonnummern ins richtige Format bringen? Das sollte

+49 228 xyz 

sein, also so wie es hier bei diesem Laden war, bevor du es geaendert hast. Auch bei den anderen Laeden stimmt das Format nicht.

Vielen Dank und beste Gruesse, Limes
GeorgeKaplan (2024-05-26 17:43:26+00:00): Bonjour, 

Dans ce changeset, le quai de Franqueville est passé en privé ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388863607/history ) , est-ce voulu ? Si oui, est-ce toujours le cas ?
santamariense (2020-10-22 17:56:13+00:00): Oi Uchimura,
Percebi que você criou um highway _link que liga uma via tertiary a uma trunk e o classificou como motorway_link. Um link duma tertiary para uma trunk deve ser trunk_link de acordo com a wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Highway_link
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92720744
shiftee (2020-10-19 16:46:56+00:00): Accidentally requested review on this one
eggie (2020-10-19 18:05:28+00:00): Dag Lars   Die fietspad aansluiting Karveelstraat even splitsen en dan oneway=yes taggen. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=92720911
gr eggie
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-19 17:12:12+00:00): Heb ik hier iets gebroken?
dvdhoven (2020-10-19 18:01:30+00:00): Dat kan ik zo niet zeggen.
Ik ga me daar ook niet in verdiepen.
Na jouw changeset is er een verspringing ontstaan tussen Achterstraat en Ooievaar bij de Ommerveldseweg en daardoor was de route onderbroken.
Dat heb ik hersteld
Voor mij is dat een simpele routineklus.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-19 18:32:55+00:00): Hoi Dick,

Dan denk ik dat de kruising die ik heb veranderd in twee T-splitsingen een route bevatte die ik over het hoofd heb gezien. Ik ga daar volgende keer op letten. Fijn dat je dat snel hebt kunnen repareren.

Mvg,
Casper
DUGA (2021-04-18 15:23:06+00:00): I've realigned a lot of water features based on your fixme request. They were horribly added based on dated USGS map from 50 years ago.
mbeyerle (2021-04-18 18:19:31+00:00): Thank you for realigning. My thought was roughly aligned but named waterways tagged with 'fixme' were better than having none at all...