piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
topolusitania (2024-04-20 22:58:20+00:00): Olá
 O RTPedro não edita ha mais de 5 anos. Duvido que responda,- Acho que podes corrigir 
TL
naoliv (2015-10-28 00:06:23+00:00): O nome do restaurante é "Comida japonesa 2" mesmo ou você não sabe o nome?
Se não souber o nome só precisa deixá-lo em branco.
Assim como existe um "Restaurante 1" próximo.
zstadler (2017-03-27 12:57:12+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377204638
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 13:26:05+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55426764
naoliv (2015-10-27 23:55:17+00:00): Francieli, você deixou a igreja pegando a área inteira aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-21.76979/-48.18357
O que você quis fazer?
Peilscheibe (2016-10-12 09:54:20+00:00): Hi, das aeroway=aerodrome finde ich nicht ganz passend für einen Behelfslandeplatz auf der Autobahn, der im Benutzungsfall auch nur ein militärischer ist. Immerhin ist hier regelmäßig kein Flugplatz.
Peilscheibe (2016-10-27 16:22:30+00:00): Keine Antwort, schade. Aufgrund der Tatsache, dass sich hier regelmäßig kein Flugplatz befindet und dass der Zugang zu der Fläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377207302 regelmäßig keiner Beschränkung auf Militär unterliegt, habe ich die entsprechenden Objekte mit einem Prefix "case_of_defence" versehen und die access-tags entfernt.
ChrissW-R1 (2016-10-27 16:27:07+00:00): Wie wäre es mit löschen?
Peilscheibe (2016-10-27 16:41:38+00:00): Nun, ich bin kein Freund von Informationsverlusten, außerdem hast Du Dir die Mühe gemacht, das Ding einzuzeichnen. Ich sehe da kein Mandat für mich, das einfach in die Tonne zu treten. 
Vielleicht gibt es ja auch ein einheitliches Taggingschema für solche Objekte, was es einfacher machen würde, sie gemeinsam aufzufinden. Ist aber nicht meine Baustelle. 
Mein Statement ist nur, dass hier weder Flugplatz noch militärischer Sicherheitsbereich ist ;-)
Meillo (2015-10-28 14:29:34+00:00): Sehr schoen! :-)
simone (2015-10-27 23:58:56+00:00): grazie per i contributi ad OpenStreetMap. potreste per favore aggiungere anche un commento all'insieme di modifiche quando fate il caricamento? Grazie, S.
Luuuddooo (2015-10-27 22:52:17+00:00): Bonjour,
Il doit y avoir une erreur, vous avez laissé des nœuds mais supprimé les routes correspondantes ici: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1954852437
et ici:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3805915208
user_599436 (2015-11-06 22:48:49+00:00): Hi, sundance. Why have you deleted the Confederation Bridge? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368187032/history
SomeoneElse (2019-12-23 11:56:24+00:00): Hello, 
I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 4 years ago.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377214393/history was added with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.
If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-01-06 23:46:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 79269167 where the changeset comment is: Reverting Google-sourced changes.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34915225 for context.
Rherison Jhones D Avila da Silva (2015-10-27 23:12:38+00:00): Nome da rua alterado conforme placas. Adicionada uma mercearia.
Glassman (2015-10-28 01:47:20+00:00): I removed the name=Test from tag. Otherwise great addition.
naoliv (2016-01-09 15:35:27+00:00): De onde você tirou a informação sobre a qualidade das vias (smoothness)?
naoliv (2015-12-13 05:31:46+00:00): Rherison, o sentido, direção ou destino das ruas não devem ser colocanos no nome delas.
Você pode colocar isso como destino (na tag "destination") ou como descrição (na tag "description")
SomeoneElse (2015-11-08 17:18:40+00:00): Hi, any reason why you moved Tor y Foel http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1545868470 here?  I was only there last month and moved it to the actual location on the ground.  You've moved it to the west a bit.
CYM1988 (2015-11-08 21:27:36+00:00): Hi, I didn't actually realise I had moved this one. Apologies there, shall correct that
SomeoneElse (2015-11-08 23:12:43+00:00): Thanks for that.  As with Cefn y Cnwc, the "Y" appears to have got capitalised here too.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-08 17:21:25+00:00): My understanding of Welsh spelling is that "Cefn y Cnwc" is preferred over "Cefn Y Cnwc" (in that you see the first form far more than the second).  What evidence do you have that "Cefn Y Cnwc" is correct here?
CYM1988 (2015-11-08 21:25:20+00:00): Hi, I had seen both versions on a number of sources, the latest being from an old signpost. I shall enquire further into the most appropriate grammar use here. It could be a case of spelling changing slightly over time but will check
SomeoneElse (2015-11-09 21:36:12+00:00): Hi, I checked with someone in the #osm IRC channel who did Welsh as part of their degree, and apparently "y" is the correct form here.  I suspect that it's a bit like English placenames such as "Bridge of Allan" - you wouldn't capitalise the "o" of "of".
CYM1988 (2015-11-09 22:11:39+00:00): Hi, ahh ok, thanks for that. I was curious as to which one was correct. Shall correct it. Yeah I imagine it is like the "of" in English.
neuhausr (2015-11-16 18:24:15+00:00): 1) calling your attention to the messy golf course outline (see http://tinyurl.com/psrj2jy), and 2) a reminder that it is best practice in most cases to NOT attach landuse nodes to the highways surrounding them (see here for a logical explanation: http://tinyurl.com/qhr4gla)
mweper (2015-10-30 22:46:27+00:00): Hola Francisco. Gracias por colaborar. 
¿En serio ese café se llama así?. Por favor, coloca el nombre correcto del café o borra el nodo. Recuerda que todas las ediciones que hagas son públicas y no se debe generar vandalismo.
Saludos.
Supaplex (2015-10-28 03:55:19+00:00): 鐵路站重覆了，請保留一個就好
user_5359 (2022-04-30 12:07:23+00:00): 
Hello! Please take a look at the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3799501036/history. You have here the two tags
payment = Tarjeta Uruguay Social
payment_1 = Efectivo
Please also read the Wiki page https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:payment. This key is not about which money is paid out but how a product can be paid for. Do I understand the tag payment_1 = Efectivo correctly as payment:cash = yes?

Hola. Por favor, eche un vistazo al nodo https://www.osm.org/node/3799501036/history. Tienes aquí las dos etiquetas
pago = Tarjeta Uruguay Social
payment_1 = Efectivo
Lea también la página Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:payment. Esta clave no tiene que ver con el dinero que se paga, sino con la forma en que se puede pagar un producto. ¿Entiendo correctamente la etiqueta payment_1 = Efectivo como payment:cash = yes?
ViriatoLusitano (2015-11-24 18:05:35+00:00): Mas a estrada parece ser maior que as outras agrícolas. :)
Rui Oliveira (2015-11-24 19:01:40+00:00): Optei por classificar esta estrada como agricola:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349678005#map=16/41.9223/-7.8919

Pela seguinte razão, neste caso o tamanho da estrada (a sua extensão), nao conta muito, mas penso que encaixa nos requisitos de uma estrada florestal melhor. Vejamos: passa por uma densa área florestal, o piso é formado por um trilho de terra batida / areia, e como tal inapropriada para circulação de veículos ligeiros. Vê a descrição do tipo de estrada aqui: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack 

A última justificação que dei é mesmo um dos principais motivos que classifiquei esta estrada desta forma, de modo a impedir que softwares de navegação GPS sugiram rotas que incluam esta estrada. Como se pode ver é imprópria para circulação normal (i.e. fora do uso florestal)
RuelNet (2015-10-28 03:40:23+00:00): Read Me
Ale_Zena_IT (2015-10-28 07:41:09+00:00): Ciao Franca, sì generalmente il PCN ha il miglior allineamento tra i vari servizi di ortofoto disponibili.
Io a volte mi aiuto attivando sia lo strato PCN che quello di Bing (clicco col tasto destro sul livello di Bing, seleziono 'Nuovo scostamento', trascino col mouse le immagini per allinearle con un edificio o un oggetto di posizione nota, clicco su OK)
d1g (2015-10-28 07:28:19+00:00): Somthing is wrong with this applicatoin. And you are not alone: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/458916. We should inform developer about this issue.
rene78 (2015-10-28 07:52:07+00:00): Starbucks at North Pole altready? ;)
SomeoneElse (2015-10-29 22:45:24+00:00): I've removed this node, as a Starbucks has already been added at the original location http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/39.89664/116.39148 .  The issue with POI+ has already been logged; see https://github.com/davidchiles/osm-poi-editor-iOS/issues/10 .
kreuzschnabel (2020-02-15 19:24:11+00:00): Namd, ich bin heute auf der B 303 südlich Dietersdorf durchgefahren, und da ist nichts von den gemappten Mittelspannungsfreileitungen (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377252782 ) zu sehen. Auf dem Bayern-80-cm-Luftbild übrinx auch nicht :)
BeKri (2020-02-15 21:39:43+00:00): Auch soviel,
Danke für den Hinweis,
das ist der Lauf der Technik,
es wird immer mehr verbuddelt.
Auf Bing noch gut zu sehen,
heute wech.
Ich hab mal, was ich gefunden habe auf demolished: gesetzt, siehe
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81055684
Gruß und happy tagging derBeKri
luiswoo (2015-10-28 08:54:13+00:00): если строится, то landuse=construction жилой зоной это станет после сдачи.
luiswoo (2015-10-28 09:00:21+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:landuse
didier2020 (2015-10-29 06:26:57+00:00): les tags buildings et source sont en trop sur les ways composants les batiments
SK53 (2015-10-28 11:54:58+00:00): Thanks for adding yourself to OpenStreetMap. I dont recall any 1 storey buildings located precisely in this area, nor can I see them in aerial photos. I would have last surveyed here around March 2013. I notice that there are numerous other tenants located in Ayr Street Workshops, and that the postcode centroid is located over the 3-4 storey former mill/factory building adjacent to this site. If this the location then perhaps you are better mapped as a node in that building. The building I mean is on the LHS of this photo http://openstreetview.org/available/935d58529b544208c4d3a3067f1bf58e7f703cb3-large.jpg
Jose Riha (2015-10-28 18:23:46+00:00): preco obchodom a podnikom vymazavas adresu?
andrewsh (2015-10-28 18:28:06+00:00): Pretože adresu už majú.
Jose Riha (2015-10-28 18:31:16+00:00): kombinacia shop/pub + adresa nie je nic neobvykleho. pred mazanim akehokolvek tagu prosim konzultuj wiki alebo taginfo https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/amenity#combinations
andrewsh (2015-10-28 18:33:45+00:00): Nie je nič neobvyklého, ale neznamená to, že to je potrebné a to má byť. Ako mať nekonzistentné adresy na POI a budovách, tak lepšie ich mať len na budovách, za podmienkou že sa jednoznačne to otagovať.
andrewsh (2015-10-28 18:34:13+00:00): …že sa jednoznačne to dá otagovať.
SK53 (2015-10-28 12:16:16+00:00): Great to see some tidying up of footpaths around here: they were added long ago from 1940s maps in the hope of surveying them. Turned out there's far too much to do closer to N'ham. If the one you have added is a public right of way it helps if you also add a designation tag, see OSM wiki for values: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation#Rights_of_way_in_England_and_Wales
MKnight (2015-11-13 13:50:16+00:00): Die Öffnungszeiten stimmen die so? (Mal abgesehen davon, dass sie syntaktisch total falsch sind)
Wenn ich mir das richtig interpoliere: 
Mo-Fr 09:00-13:00,14:00-18:00 ist das korrekt?
EneaSuper (2015-10-28 11:53:39+00:00): Ciao Paolo, ti lascio questo screenshot per avere un dettaglio maggiore riguardo via Tacci. Se per caso riuscissi a completarla te ne sarei molto grato!

http://i.imgur.com/r8MPTpP.png
bubix (2015-10-28 15:41:28+00:00): Generalmente tendo ad non aggiornare la mappa se non ci sono stato direttamente....non mi fido delle foto aeree cmq vediamo cosa riesco fare...
EneaSuper (2015-10-28 15:49:32+00:00): Hai le tue ragioni, comunque va bene :)
BushmanK (2015-11-22 00:27:58+00:00): А что, противотуберкулезный диспансер из дома 19 по Преображенскому валу выселили?
jpennycook (2015-11-07 21:32:50+00:00): Hello.
I see that you created an A road, named Safe Haven Route, over the top of the existing residential road called West Road.  It's not clear to me what your intent was - did you mean to edit West Road rather than create a new road over the top?

Jon
mstriewe (2015-11-02 19:41:11+00:00): Hi! This changeset introduces tagging "bicycle=detached" on way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200202431. Did you mean "bicycle=dismount"?
eric_ (2015-10-29 07:12:20+00:00): As this edit creates a house number duplication (the number 2 is already on the map) and as a node can't be a building, I'm going to delete this node but to associate the added postcode with the current house number.
dcfwight (2015-10-29 09:13:39+00:00): Thx - just learning how to do this.
eric_ (2015-10-29 10:44:46+00:00): Great. Thanks for your contribution.
SynchronPolska (2015-10-28 13:03:54+00:00): Pozycjonowanie stron, reklama stron. Synchron.pl.
StephaneP (2015-10-29 08:40:14+00:00): Elle ne devrait pas plutôt être en footway cette allée Zyed Benna ? Je suis toujours un peu réticent à utiliser "track" en milieu urbain.
cquest (2015-10-29 11:32:06+00:00): J'ai laissé comme c'était... mais effectivement vu le contexte ça a plus de chance d'être du footway (et sa voisine aussi).
StephaneP (2015-10-29 12:58:56+00:00): ok
Marcus Walz (2015-10-28 14:26:40+00:00): Oakleaf Trail Extension
didier2020 (2015-10-29 06:24:59+00:00): il ne faut pas ajouter le tag building=house sur les noeuds composants un way qui a déja ce tag
zors1843 (2015-10-29 06:48:13+00:00): Zeker dat amenity=hospital hier past ?  Niet eerder amenity=doctors ?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity
GerdP (2015-11-05 19:25:12+00:00): please review:
the tag highway=residential_link is not 
useful, it should be just residential. 
But is the road already built?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82253108
tjfinlinson (2015-11-05 19:37:56+00:00): I updated a few things. Changed it to Residential. And the Vineyard Road Connector is partially built and is open from 800 N to Mill Road. It is closed from that point forward while they are building over the railroad tracks. I'm not sure how to change the road beyond Mill Road back to a planned road.
GerdP (2015-11-05 19:44:30+00:00): thanks for the quick feedback. The easiest way is to look at the history of the way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82253108/history
Use the attributes of the way before your change
Michalpawl (2015-10-28 16:16:15+00:00): Z jakiegoś powodu wskoczył tu opis mojej poprzedniej zmiany.
Powinno być: "Parking MCZ i droga dojazdowa"
Mars-Curaçao (2016-08-19 17:01:15+00:00): Residencias Jalonsie yeh yeh :-(  If you steal and change someone others data and you can not do it without making stupid mistakes!!  Your KG shit has never been there, I was because I live here and come everywhere on MY Island!! You make my navigation going crazy so please mind your own business!!
Alan (2015-10-28 23:16:32+00:00): Good job! 👏
tebiggs (2015-10-28 17:57:11+00:00): street sign and three maps show Drive, two show Street
MarkusHD (2015-11-03 20:11:21+00:00): Datenverlust bei Wetzel Motors: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2032079784
MarkusHD (2016-01-09 19:09:37+00:00): Fehler nun selbst behoben: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36469129
uvi (2017-02-21 16:36:42+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1799267036
Handelt es sich hierbei um einen richigen Milchautomaten oder nur um eine Verkaufsstelle?
Kommen Waren aus dem Regal, ist m.E. zusätzlich shop=farm mit der description, welche Sachen es dort gibt, korrekt. Sobald ein Automat steht, sollte der doch so auch erscheinen und recherchierbar sein. Ich denke, es empfiehlt sich folgendes Beispiel: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264211545
Gruß Uwe
luschi (2017-02-21 21:11:19+00:00): Hallo,     
habe bei diesen Änderungssatz das "vending=Milch, Eier" auf "vending=food" geändert was seit etwa 4 Jahren so erfasst war.     
Eventuell solltest du simon04(ist ein lokaler Mapper) fragen wie die Lage vor Ort aussieht, da er hier, vor 3 Monaten, einen Eierautomat hinzugefügt hat. www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43958589     
lg
uvi (2017-02-22 15:47:55+00:00): Danke für den Tipp, hab ich so gemacht
jonas_t (2015-10-28 17:46:35+00:00): Neu gebautes Haus hinzugefügt
MarkusHD (2015-11-03 20:08:42+00:00): Datenverlust bei Klumpp, siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2020078424
MarkusHD (2016-01-09 19:09:12+00:00): Fehler nun selbst behoben: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36469076
Alecs01 (2015-10-28 21:42:09+00:00): Perchè hai cancellato il nodo della stazione di Desio per sostituirlo con uno nuovo? attenzione, perchè faceva parte di 4 relazioni
GerdP (2015-11-18 14:22:04+00:00): Hi there!
Please review my changeset regarding
an invalid tag oneway="-1;yes":

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35406944
SomeoneElse (2015-11-07 16:09:31+00:00): On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3063948/history you've changed "source:prow:ref" to "source:prow_ref" despite the ":prow:ref" existing and ":prow_ref" not.  This makes no sense :)
ChrissW-R1 (2015-11-18 12:54:11+00:00): That's not correct. I used the taginfo tool to find similar tags.
The key "source:prow:ref" (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/source%3Aprow%3Aref) only existed in the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/3063948/history. The key "source:prow_ref" (http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/source%3Aprow_ref), in which I changed it to, exists in more than ten thousand features! In addition, the value fits to the new key.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-18 13:11:21+00:00): Please, step back a bit and _think_ about what you are actually doing.  This way has a "prow:ref" key.  The key "source:prow:ref=definitive_statement" means "the source of the prow:ref key is the definitive statement".  You've changed it to "source:prow_ref" but there is no "prow_ref" key.

Additionally, if you do not understand what these keys mean or what a "definitive statement" is you should not be changing their values on OSM.
ChrissW-R1 (2015-11-18 13:32:47+00:00): Oh I see, sorry. It is reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35405632
SomeoneElse (2015-11-21 20:19:49+00:00): Thanks.
MarkusHD (2015-10-29 09:31:15+00:00): Hör doch endlich mal auf, den "name"-key für alles mögliche zu nutzen, was überhaupt keinen Namen darstellt. Für den "Aufzug" gibt es "highway=elevator". Statt "Rollstuhlzugang" kann "wheelchair=yes" verwendet werden, das kann dann auch wirklich für Rollstuhl-Routing ausgewertet werden. Zusätzlich den AOK-Haupteingang mit "wheelchair=no" oder besser den Fußweg zum Haupteingang anpassen, der soweit ich mich erinnere gar kein Weg, sondern eine Treppe ist.
R0bst3r (2015-10-30 11:51:37+00:00): name ist NUR der Name! Die Beschreibungen gehören in description oder wie mein Vorredner schon sagte in ganz andere Tags rein:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names
MarkusHD (2015-10-31 14:04:17+00:00): Weiterer Fehler: dieses Gebäude (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377333538) neben der Bahnhofstr. 1 existiert nicht, das ist nur eine Mischung aus Schatten, Hofeinfahrt und Dach des Nachbargebäudes. Bitte genauer hinschauen, wenn du schon nicht vor Ort vorbeigehst. Von den Gebäuden sollen auch die Grundrisse auf dem Boden eingezeichnet werden, nicht die Dachflächen, die meist größer und aufgrund der Perspektive versetzt sind. Oder mal JOSM verwenden und Maps4BW als Hintergrundebene aktivieren, damit werden die Gebäude sowieso genauer und sind einfacher zu zeichnen.
MarkusHD (2015-11-03 20:02:32+00:00): Weiterer Datenverlust beim "Barong" (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1210382437) und "Zum Hirsch" (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1008216464)
tebiggs (2015-10-28 18:30:40+00:00): added turning circle
tebiggs (2015-10-28 18:44:20+00:00): added turning circle
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-09-19 08:08:41+00:00): Hi! You added a caravan site ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3807169645 ), but the `tourism=caravan_site` should only be used for real, proper caravan sites. Not places you can park you caravan.

I've deleted it here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52166391 ) because it's not really there. Please only add *real* caravan sites.

If you'd like to come up with better tagging for "places where you can park you caravan" then by all means do that. :)
Alecs01 (2015-10-28 21:34:58+00:00): Ciao, posso chiederti perchè unisci il landuse=* alle strade che lo delimitano? specie se ci sono già e sono disegnati separatamente, non vedo perchè modificarli. Idealmente, le strade in OSM sono delle linee che ne ne scorrono al centro (è un'astrazione ovviamente, nella realtà hanno uno spessore). Edifici, campi coltivati, aree residenziali o industriali non toccano il centro della strada, per cui non dovrebbero avere dei nodi in comune. Oltretutto, tenerli separati semplifica il lavoro di chi dovesse fare delle modifiche in qualunque momento successivo. Un saluto
Marco_T (2015-11-27 10:26:37+00:00): Concordo con quanto detto da Alecs01. Si deve mappare la realta' delle cose, non perche' la mappa sia bella. Legare i landuse alle strade non e' corretto e crea problematiche nella successiva manutenzione. Complimenti comunque per il grosso impegno ed apporto che stai dando. Ciao.
corfede (2015-11-27 11:32:55+00:00): Mi aggiungo anche io, perchè in linea coi commenti di Alecs e Marco_T, ritengo che queste campiture fatte unendo i punti dei landuse alle strade, oltre ad essere concettualmente sbagliate, creano anche non pochi problemi per la manutenzione successiva dei dati. Come richiesto da Alecs sarebbe interessabte capire perchè operi in questo modo. Ciao.
IlBano (2015-11-27 11:40:51+00:00): Condivido appieno i commenti di Alecs01 e Marco_T. Connettere i nodi dei landuse a nodi appartenti ad altri elementi rende forse la mappa esteticamente più bella, ma crea problemi per i mapper che editeranno dopo di te e potenzialmente per chi userà le informazioni inserite. Spero che coglierai questi commenti come un feedback utile a migliorare il tuo importante contributo a OSM.
Ciao
GerdP (2015-11-14 20:07:34+00:00): please review:
I've changed surface=A to asphalt,
but I've no idea why layer=2 is used here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377345719
voschix (2015-11-15 08:37:38+00:00): Thanks for the check. Corrected.
GerdP (2015-11-15 08:40:19+00:00): OK, thanks for the feedback.
A_70 (2015-10-28 19:28:20+00:00): This point is added as pilot test of humanitarian proj.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-13 10:08:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75619145 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some licence-incompatible changes in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3195 etc. for details.
SomeoneElse (2015-11-07 16:19:33+00:00): This is another tag change that makes no sense.  On http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3584313770/history you've changed source:ref:name to source_ref:name , despite there being a source:ref key but no source_ref.  
Changes such as this suggest that you are making no attempt to understand the underlying data, and are simply making changes using mechanical rules.  You should be aware that mechanical edits such as this should be documented and discussed with the community beforehand: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .

In the case of this one node, it might have been easier to simply ask the previous mapper about it, which I can see from looking at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31855597 that you did not do.