piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
balint36 (2022-12-19 22:54:39+00:00): Szintén indokolatlanul lettek szétnyirbálva:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/579737563
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113652071
smarko21 (2022-12-06 09:16:03+00:00): Thanks!
Frans S (2022-11-20 12:03:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project. Your mappings are precise.
However, do not connect nodes of highways to other features like hedges or buildings.
Where a road crosses a hedge, a gap must be made in the hedge. Stop mapping the hedge near the road, and continue on the opposite of that road.
Try to identify roads leading to hamlets and isolated buildings.
How to decide a road is wide enough to be tagged as unclassified

 How to measure the width of a road in IDeditor:
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes, and you get the width.

Best regards
eggie (2022-11-16 13:49:33+00:00): Hoi..

Je vraagt feedback..
Een veldweg zou goed kunnen als deze breed genoeg is voor bv bosvoertuigen.
Een highway=track heeft altijd een tracktype.. 
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:NL:Map_Features:tracktype
Zou het noordelijke verloop ook een track zijn? 
Verder wellicht ook motor_vehicle=no en  forestry = yes?

Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-11-16 15:40:12+00:00): Die witruimte is overigens geen garantie dat er een pad of veldweg loopt.
De witruimte is ontstaan omdat er kavels uit de 3dshapes data zijn geïmporteerd.
Langlaeufer (2022-11-16 15:08:47+00:00): Hi Godik,

bicycle=designated entfernen ist hier nicht richtig.
Es sind nicht benutzungspflichtige Radwege vorhanden. Designated sagt nichts über die Benutzungspflicht aus sondern nur ob da ein Weg für Radfahrer ist.

das entfernen von cycleway:surface/footway:surface ist ein Kampf gegen Windmühlen, da es von StreetComplete gesetzt wird.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128991986
Langlaeufer (2022-11-16 15:16:36+00:00): Zum Thema bicycle=designated
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=76290
Godik (2022-12-06 10:20:29+00:00): Okay, "designated" hatt ich mit Benutzungspflicht gleichgesetzt, daher die Bearbeitung.
Der Weg auf der Nordseite der Blumenauer Straße ist allerdings wirklich ein Gehweg, Radverkehr frei, daher werde ich das wieder ändern.
VG!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128991986
alex_lofi (2022-11-16 15:20:08+00:00): Hola @kapazao, le he dado a «flagged» en osm aparentemente, no sé muy bien cómo ni cómo quitarlo...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128992211
osmviborg (2022-11-16 21:14:33+00:00): Dublet, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1012135275
dpolovinkin (2024-03-15 19:59:24+00:00): hi, be careful, here you added a building which was already added there 3 days before - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1112644243
emersonveenstra (2022-11-17 12:20:48+00:00): Hi,

Why did you add the calling code +49 to this phone number?
Nordpfeil (2022-11-17 14:23:23+00:00): Sorry, that was my mistake. 
I amended it to read "+1 ..."
MxxCon (2022-11-17 21:49:34+00:00): Hello.
Would a gas station & car repair shop be more suitable as "industrial" or "commercial" rather than "retail"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128993360
Emey_lyft (2022-11-18 13:20:04+00:00): Hello, MxxCon.
	My name is Ruslan, and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. 
	Thank you for your question. Indeed two objects that indicate strictly retail or commercial areas are located in the selected zone. According to OSMWiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dretail), gas stations are a sign of “landuse=retail” (because they sell goods here), and (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial), car service centers are a sign of “landuse=commercial” (because they provide services here). I have come to the conclusion that the most appropriate value would be retail area guided by the article about the fuel stations (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dfuel#The_entire_area_of_the_gas_station) that says "Use landuse=retail for the entire area of ​​the gas station". It is also worth noting that despite the presence of the “building=industrial” tag on the car service center, I wouldn’t mark the landuse zone as “industrial”, because no goods are produced here (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dcommercial).
Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Best regards, Ruslan
balint36 (2022-12-11 13:37:00+00:00): Gondolom itt is várhatok választ, hogy az alábbi két vonal miért lett szétszedve, úgyse fogok kapni.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631762260
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113693607
balint36 (2022-12-19 22:22:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113696568
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/444130519
balint36 (2022-12-19 22:22:29+00:00): Szintén indokolatlan szétszabdalás
map per (2022-11-17 18:01:31+00:00): Hallo dufterbe,

ich hab eine kleine Anmerkung zu deiner Änderung:

An Wohngebiets Flächen (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113697509) würde ich keine Namen eintragen, weil der Name des Weilers Gallhof hier schon am place node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240056991) eingetragen ist.

Viele Grüße
map per
silversurfer83 (2022-11-16 20:43:10+00:00): Hi there,
thanks for helping with HOT-Projects :)
Please try to keep your edits local. See here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Cheers
silversurfer83
map per (2022-11-17 20:20:43+00:00): Hello silversurfer83,

looks like you accidentally dragged roads around (1). I will fix that errors, but please try to avoid that.

Cheers
map per

(1) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43086397
eggie (2022-11-16 14:38:15+00:00): Hoi...

Er was daar nog een originele BAG adresnode 1A.. Daar heb ik de info van Trattoria Sophia mee samengevoegd. 
Groet
eggie
bxl-forever (2022-11-16 23:41:54+00:00): Hello,

Sorry but we had to undo your latest changes.

Let me explain:
The house and the music venue are not the same thing.  The house is just a house with a housenumber.  The music venue should have its own node, with name=BBB Studio and be tagged as amenity=music_venue.

OpenStreetMap is primarily a database.  The "map" is just a layer that renders *some* information from the database.  There are plenty of different layers (6 different layers on osm.org and dozens of other renderings elsewhere or on mobile apps), some will show this point and some won’t.

I suppose you are primarily interested to have the name visible on the map.  But putting the name on the building itself is not correct.  (This is called "mapping for the renderer, i.e. putting incorrect information in the database to achieve some results on the map.)

The devs of the main map layer—the most popular one, visible on osm.org, I guess that’s the one you had in mind—are dealing with several new tags that could be rendered in the future.  I will try to warn them about the idea of adding an icon for all the places with amenity=music_venue.
bergaufsee (2022-11-17 18:42:38+00:00): Hallo ulrichg, 
wann soll denn hier eine Eisenbahnstrecke gewesen sein und wann wurde sie rückgebaut? Ich bin die Strecke jetzt nicht abgelaufen, aber ich kann mich hier nicht an erkennbare Merkmale oder gar eine Bahnstrecke erinnern. Auf den Luftbildern ist auch nichts dergleichen erkennbar.
So ergibt das für mich keinen Sinn. Kannst du bitte die Hintergründe oder Quellen dazu benennen, ansonsten würde ich das gern wieder entfernen.
Gruß bergaufsee
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-11-17 08:42:55+00:00): Hi Ruben Morgado, 
I see that you have created a lot of admin_level=6 relations, but you have created a lot of duplicated overlapping geometries. Please fix these and use existing geometries for the newly created relations
Ruben Morgado (2022-11-17 13:10:44+00:00): Hey Alessandar, I only created the paths inside the districts (admin_level=5) to create the relations for Postos Administrativos (admin_level=6) with existing paths. Please, advice where are the issues, how to fix and will work on it. Thanks
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-11-17 17:16:34+00:00): For example, there is a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/852437187/ and when you created a new admin_level=6 boundary relation, you actually created a duplicate https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113702779.

And there are a lot of them, for each relation that you have created you have made duplicates of existing ways that are now overlapping. Old ways have admin_level=5 and other relations, but your new ways have just admin_level=6 relations. For example, try to move node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10188822374 and you will see that there are overlapping ways underneath
Ruben Morgado (2022-11-18 03:58:48+00:00): I dont understand how I did it because I brought the admin_level=5 to JOSM to create admin_level=6...added the intersection ways and uploaded everything...should I uploaded the admin_level=6 before I do the relations?
Ruben Morgado (2022-11-18 04:12:35+00:00): Advise in how should I have done it. Delete that changeset and revert back and I will do it again.
Ruben Morgado (2022-11-18 04:25:13+00:00): My process was:
1. Download to JOSM from overpass the admin5 from Inhambane province
2. Got the admin6 ways from a survey
3. Created the relations for admin6 with existing admin5 and new admin6 ways
4. Uploaded everything
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-11-18 07:37:06+00:00): OK, I think I got what has happened. The problem was overpass (ok thing to do), you would have to do one more thing before creating relations and that is download all members of the existing relations, so you will then get elements to put in new admin 6 relations. With overpass, you have created a separate layer with just new relations, so it created duplicated ways. You can also select ways you have downloaded with overpass and use Download along function in JOSM. Do one by one and upload, it will be easy to fix if something goes wrong. If you need asistance I am available for helping
Ruben Morgado (2022-11-18 14:25:58+00:00): Ok - I will try one district at the time, as follows:
1. Download District X (admin5) ways including relations to layer 0 on JOSM
2. Add ways for admin6 division and fill boundary, admin_level and type tags
3. Edit ways of admin5 on intersections with admin6
4. Create new relation for admin6 with existing admin5 ways and new admin6 ways
5. Upload
6. Check if everything is good

Agree? If yes, revert back changeset so I can start over, please, and let me know.

Thanks and sorry for the mess, I'm not a OSM professional :P
4. Create
Aleksandar Matejevic (2022-11-18 15:53:09+00:00): Perfectly fine step by step.

No need to apologize, you have actually added very valuable info, we just need to polish it up :)
Ruben Morgado (2022-11-18 16:51:08+00:00): Ok - did you revert the changeset? Will restart tomorrow. Thanks
vja (2022-11-18 08:01:46+00:00): De constructie die hier met way 1113703429 en node 10188836755 is toegevoegd, is in werkelijkheid al opgeruimd. Afgelopen weekeinde heb ik deze n.a.v. note 3435996 en na onderzoek ter plaatse in changeset 128843203 al van de kaart verwijderd.
Nu kan ik deze nieuwe way en node natuurlijk ook weer verwijderen, maar ik ben bang dat we elkaar dan aardig bezig kunnen gaan houden. Hoe voorkomen we dat?
CartoKees (2022-11-18 10:09:46+00:00): Door dit bericht. Ik twijfelde al een klein beetje, maar gezien bouwjaar 2018 toch opgevoerd. Inmiddels heb ik de constructie weer verwijderd. Ook heb ik het als uitzondering voor mezelf opgeslagen zodat ik het niet nog een keer ga toevoegen.

Bedankt voor het bericht.

Met vriendelijke groet,

CartoKees
vja (2022-11-18 11:08:58+00:00): Mooi, dank je wel voor de vlotte reactie (en actie).

Groeten,
Vincent.
Helium314 (2022-12-05 18:38:51+00:00): Hi,
wenn du Gehsteige separat einträgst, denk bitte daran den sidewalk Tag der zugehörigen Straße anzupassen (normalerweise auf separate, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sidewalk#Werte ) oder wenigstens zu entfernen, um doppelt gemappte Gehsteige zu vermeiden.
FAS007 (2022-12-14 12:12:14+00:00): Hallo,
danke für den Hinweis. Das hab ich vergessen zu überprüfen.
Werde es mir notieren.
adiatmad (2022-11-17 02:54:43+00:00): Halo Rereree,
Mungkin halaman ini bisa membantu untuk menambahkan objek ATM di OSM.
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Datm)
Salam.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128995084
Jakka (2022-11-16 15:32:45+00:00): une erreur de frappe ? opning_hours
Fr 10:30-25:00
Teddy BEER (2022-11-17 00:33:02+00:00): Merci pour la correction ! 👍
waldyrious (2022-11-16 14:25:30+00:00): Note: I meant to limit the changes just to the nodes in the Philippines, but my overpass clumsiness led me to edit nodes in other counties as well.

In any case, this isn't problematic, as I was going to do those edits anyway. I just wanted to separate them by country for more convenient inspection.
joneabcxyz (2022-11-18 07:34:19+00:00): https://all-keyboard.com/
balint36 (2022-12-19 14:55:47+00:00): Itt is szétvágtad a három vonalat:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655595849
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113707591
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113707594
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/836772591
Továbbra is indokolatlanul.
balint36 (2022-12-19 14:55:57+00:00): *négy vonalat
Sandal man (2022-11-16 15:46:12+00:00): Klettergebiet ?
Don't think that is a official tag?
Sandal man (2022-11-17 21:06:27+00:00): Removed, is allready on the map.
Sandal man (2022-11-17 21:10:01+00:00): Removed wrong climbing tags.
Nakaner (2022-11-17 09:30:25+00:00): Hallo,

wenn du Bahnsteige als Flächen erfasst, solltest du sie auch mit area=yes taggen. Andernfalls kann man sie nicht von ringförmigen, als Linien erfassten Bahnsteigen unterscheiden.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128995827
nw520 (2022-11-17 21:59:06+00:00): Hallo sz0j3k und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Bitte beachte, dass das Feld "Name" wirklich nur für Namen und nicht Beschreibungen gedacht ist. Siehe dazu auch das Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Beste Grüße und viel Spaß beim Kartieren.
PT-53 (2022-11-17 09:23:03+00:00): Hallo Alexander Boeckh,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Beim Einzeichnen des neuen Gebäudes wurden versehentlich Daten doppelt eingetragen, am Gebäudeumriß
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113709508/history
sowie an diesem Gebäude-Eck-Knoten:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10188890338/history
Ich habe die Doppel-Eingabe berichtigt und das Gebäude noch an die korrekte Position (gem. Luftrbild nach Korrektur des Luftbildversatzes) geschoben.
Grüße aus dem westl. Landkreis BC
waldyrious (2022-11-16 14:43:50+00:00): Note: I meant to limit the changes just to continental Europe, as the changeset comment attests, but my overpass clumsiness led me to edit nodes in other places as well.

In any case, this isn't problematic, as I was going to do those edits anyway. I just wanted to separate them by region for more convenient inspection.
maraf24 (2022-11-16 23:50:52+00:00): 1. There is no discussion on building=guardhouse
2. This is automated mass edit and should be done according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
waldyrious (2022-11-17 14:54:12+00:00): Apologies, I'll be more careful in the future. Given the scale of the changes, I should indeed have announced my intent and obtained community approval for the edit. I am OK with these edits being reverted if they're deemed damaging.
PT-53 (2022-11-17 09:42:13+00:00): Hallo Alexander Boeckh,
in diesem Änderungssatz hast Du diese 2 Wege
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113710946/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113710945/history
neu eingezeichnet.
Das sind zwei identische Wege. Außerdem waren da schon Wege vorhanden, so daß dort 3 Wege übereinander lagen.
Ich habe Deine neuen Wege mal nur verschoben damit das für Dich auch sichtbar wird.

Statt neue Wege einzuzeichnen sollten die bereits in OSM vorhandenen Wege entspr. angepaßt werden.
Ich kann das gerne übernehmen, wenn diese Wege entsprechend als Service-Zufahrt ausgebaut worden sind. Ist das der Fall?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
Alexander Boeckh (2022-11-17 10:19:21+00:00): Hallo PT-53, vielen Dank für die Antwort und die schnelle Bearbeitung. Der bisherige Weg war ein Feldweg und wurde nun zur Servicezufahrt ausgebaut, daher wäre eine Anpassung des bisherigen Weges die bessere Lösung.
bei Fragen gerne per Mail: a.boeckh@boa-gmbh.de oder Tel: 07392/969968-16
PT-53 (2022-11-17 10:29:27+00:00): Hallo Alexander Boeckh, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Ich habe jetzt die beiden Weg-Duplikate gelöscht und den Feldweg zum Service-Highway hochgestuft.
Wegen des Straßennamens und der 30 kmh-Höchstgeschwindigkeit wollte ich Dich zur Sicherheit nochmal Fragen ob das für den ganzen ehemaligen Feldweg gilt?
Grüße
Alexander Boeckh (2022-11-17 10:31:14+00:00): Ja das gilt für den gesamten Feldweg
PT-53 (2022-11-17 10:34:22+00:00): OK, ich habe das jetzt noch ergänzt.
MossyRock4 (2022-11-16 14:49:03+00:00): Gate added per local knowledge. No access through gate at this location.
MossyRock4 (2022-12-29 17:41:46+00:00): Resolved
Langlaeufer (2023-10-18 12:39:19+00:00): A car shop in the fields?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128996424
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-11-17 08:48:56+00:00): نرجوا منكم عدم القيام بتغيير تصنيف المكان وإضافة معلومات سكانية غير صحيحة
olsols (2022-11-16 15:00:06+00:00): nie osm notes a streetview :)
Map-Peter (2022-11-30 22:11:04+00:00): Hallo Karsten,
 
was soll das ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10188933832 ) sein?
 
Du schreibst etwas von "shops"
Aktuell hat dieser Node aber nur "name=Burg Klempenow" .
 
Da fehlt also noch "shop=*" siehe: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop .
 
Gruß Peter
kuhni74 (2023-04-01 16:13:49+00:00): den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/349144089 konnte ich vor Ort weder von oben noch von unten auffinden, ich denke, er ist weiter östlich, sh. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3623247
kuhni74 (2023-04-01 16:30:13+00:00): auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113717732 ist meines Erachtens länger verwachsen, Markierung verläuft auf track
Frans S (2022-11-29 15:25:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project as a new mapper.
A remark here. You tagged a river as track as well. When you follow the trace of that river, you can see that it is unlikely that this will be used as a road as well.  No traces of other roads leading to or connecting to this trace.
Best regards
NorthCrab (2022-11-16 20:54:52+00:00): Czy to nadal jest kawiarnia? A nie bar? Kawiarni otwartej do 2 rano to nie widziałem :D
dumlem_ (2022-11-29 10:12:01+00:00): Tak, masz rację :v
Frans S (2022-11-17 11:59:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
About tagging of buildings.
A building need to be mapped as building=yes.
When you want to map an isolated dwelling, hamlet etc, a single node with the tag is sufficient.
As the instructions says. tag these as hamlet, isolated dwelling etc.
Best regards
maraf24 (2022-11-19 12:26:08+00:00): Zniknął prawoskręt dla autobusów w św. Mikołaja. Teraz w relacjach jest dziura.
maraf24 (2022-11-19 12:26:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/187405645
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800454328
Mordechai23 (2022-11-21 10:49:53+00:00): ajj myślałem że wszystko przekopiowałem. Poprawiłem 103, 132 i 142
Mordechai23 (2022-11-21 10:52:55+00:00): 257, 248, 257, 247 i K też
maraf24 (2022-11-23 10:38:00+00:00): I tyle roboty tylko dla niewielkiego uproszczenia skrzyżowania...
Patr1k_P (2022-11-22 13:08:40+00:00): este taky maly postreh, na samostatne domy sa dava detached, na vacsi rodinny dom,resp. dvojdom sa dava house...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Ddetached

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhouse

....okrem toho namiesto mazania by sa mali objekty editovat kvoli zachovaniu historie, ale chvalim ze si preniesol aspon adresne tagy :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931927218
Dodko (2022-11-22 15:11:55+00:00): Nepreniesol, budovu Márie Hollósyovej 1633/9 vymazal tka som ju vytvoril nanovo https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113720618#map=19/48.31026/17.49774
Patr1k_P (2022-11-22 15:30:15+00:00): nerozumiem..povodnu tvoju budovu on zmazal a vytvoril ju znovu, adresne tagy vsak aspon preniesol
Dodko (2022-11-22 15:40:08+00:00): moju budovu z 2021 zmazal
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931927218/history
a zle som pozrel vytvoril ju on
anirud (2022-11-22 21:25:15+00:00): Ja som preniesol obrys z katastra (ci zbgis), v katastri predpokladam, ze su obrysy presne, najma pre novostavby, robia to geodeti. Tagy som prekopiroval. Neviem, ako by sa dal preniest obrys...
Patr1k_P (2022-11-23 12:13:20+00:00): cez UtilsPlugin2 sa to robi..klavesova skratka Ctrl+Shift+G ktora sa da samozrejme zmenit
Dodko (2022-11-23 13:25:59+00:00): Prípadne ak sa budova kreslí ručne podľa čiar z katastra, tak klávesová skratka W a upraviť tým existujúcu budovu.
Klik myšou presunie bod, Ctrl + klik pridá nový bod.
woodpeck (2022-11-16 15:51:51+00:00): This trail crosses a footpath without connecting properly. Also, the end of the trail is just  metres away from "Easy Line" but does not connect to it. The trail you have drawn here is not visible on aerial imagery - the sharp bend to the South-West is particularly questionable. Please do not upload your GPX files as paths without proper quality control!
HPman83 (2022-11-16 16:26:42+00:00): Modifications done. Connections added with the others trails.
The trail is new and under tree cover. It's a MTB trail with a lot of turns. I just rode it last Sunday.
Tomas Straupis (2022-11-17 06:45:01+00:00): Lietuvoje pagal administracinį suskirstymą nėra tokio miesto „Nida“ ar „Pervalka“. Yra tik miestas „Neringa“. Taigi ir adresų „Nida“ nebūna.
rbs_ (2022-11-17 07:41:04+00:00): Super, ačiū už paaiškinimą, Tomai.
Kovoschiz (2022-11-17 06:22:09+00:00): 1. Please note that precincts are already using `attraction=theme_area`, except East Coast Park. They are tentatively covered by Wan Chai Temporary Promenade. 
2. A boat ride is not a `=marina`. It doesn't allow yachts to anchor.
Wetitpig0 (2022-11-17 11:14:43+00:00): Thanks for fixing the marina. I have no idea how to tag.

For the Precincts I think I have to look into how they should be organised and managed. Should the Wan Chai Temporary Promenade consist of the parks themselves and be designated as a cluster instead of the borders and be designated as a park?
nevw (2022-11-17 10:46:42+00:00): Hi
Do you know where this po box should be located?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9737339619/history
nevw (2022-11-17 10:47:55+00:00): Sorry… misposted 🫤
nevw (2022-11-17 12:31:55+00:00): This po box has been relocated to the right place now by the original mapper.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120928109
emersonveenstra (2022-11-16 21:10:26+00:00): Hi,

You seem to have tagged both https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1113725863 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10189029770 with amenity=waste_disposal. Could you please merge those so only the way has them? Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128999117
felipeeugenio (2022-11-16 19:13:31+00:00): Hola. Qué es lo que intentas hacer con esoas restricciones de giro?. Qué cartel es el que intentas plasmar? Saludos
Frans S (2022-11-30 10:09:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
A remark.
When the stream you have mapped, crosses a path/road, that crossing need to be tagged, in this case, as a ford. Please keep that in mind at future mappings.
Best regards