piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Matthew Darwin (2018-03-15 18:11:24+00:00): w569716016  There are two "43 Madden Ct" and two "45 Madden Ct".  Not sure if this is intentional?
Matthew Darwin (2018-03-15 18:14:09+00:00): Maybe those ones in the weird shape should be numbered, 35, 37, 39, 41 instead of 39, 41, 43, 45.  Then there would be no duplicates.
DannyMcD (2018-03-16 03:41:18+00:00): Yes, the addresses should be 35 to 41.  I have corrected this.
Alecs01 (2018-12-31 15:39:42+00:00): Altri quattro telefoni cancellati https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2293109033/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2293107575/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2321155023/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2360384610/history
maraf24 (2018-03-14 22:44:45+00:00): "Droga bez nazwy nr 1" to jest droga, która nie ma nazwy, a nie taka, która ma taką właśnie  nazwę!
viloan (2018-03-14 18:23:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
highflyer74 (2018-03-15 11:59:16+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Hier wurde ein Node (Punkt) ohne valide OSM Tags hinzugefügt. Bitte beachte, dass Du hier an einer Live-Datenbank arbeitest. Diese soll nicht für etwaige "Tests" benutzt werden. Ich entferne den Punkt deshalb wieder. Wenn Du Fragen hast, kannst Du sie gern direkt hier in Changeset stellen, oder Dich an das OSM Forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14) wenden.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Viele Grüße aus HB!
frosm (2018-06-18 17:35:10+00:00): Bonjour,
la convention de la communauté locale est d'utiliser les noms officiels de l’administration pour les lieux dit et les rivières.
Par conséquent aucun nom en france n'est bilingue et le tag name contient un seul et unique nom.
name:eu permet d'accueillir le toponyme si celui-ci n'est pas déjà présent
trapicki (2020-09-06 19:15:36+00:00): Ich würd diesen Eintrag gern ausbauen. wetland sollte ein Fläche sein, daher: Ist der Teich noch gefüllt, versumpft oder einfach am Auslass offen? Der Bach scheint dann ein Rohrdurchlass zu sein, richtig?
Cascafico (2018-03-15 09:42:37+00:00): Welcome in OSM & thanks for addresses!
CryptikFox (2023-08-09 05:04:03+00:00): Hi OrcaDan, thanks for all your contributions! I noticed in this changeset (and some others) that you had switched all of the minor track roads to unclassified throughout Capitol State Forest. Was there a reason for interpreting them this way?

To me, it would make sense if the main roads throughout the forest were unclassified, then the little side roads that branch off can be track. Not only would this create a nice hierarchy for the roads here, but these roads all seem to suit the OSM definition of track quite well.

Let me know what you think.
OrcaDan (2023-08-09 13:45:40+00:00): I agree with you. When I first added the roads, I misunderstood the definition of track. As I have been doing specific edits, I have changed the minor roads over to tracks but I have not gone back and systematically reclassified the minor roads.
CryptikFox (2023-08-09 21:10:13+00:00): Thanks for the feedback!
mike140 (2018-03-30 21:17:59+00:00): Откуда брали границу деревни Линтваревка? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8113209#map=16/50.9824/34.6136
vovan__l (2018-04-02 14:59:14+00:00): З кадастрової карти
mike140 (2018-04-02 19:43:15+00:00): Вот кадастровая карта: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1JGgeWJzQcZb53vyM0PoQtlEsnq1O2vxk - по какой линии Вы проводили границу?
vovan__l (2018-04-03 16:12:29+00:00): Доброго часу доби.Очевидно вас хвилює нетотожність моєї лінії з лінією кадастру.Поясню чому я так зробив.На знімку чітко видно,що скупчення земельних ділянок і будівель це єдиний комплекс - населений пункт Линтварівка.Очевидно що у вулиць села є назви, а у будинків адреси.Будинок чи вулиця за межами населеного пункту випадають з адресного пошуку, тому щоб уникнути цього я провів межі Линтварівки по фактично зайнятій території.Доволі часто буває, що яка небудь вулиця Новопостроєна за кадастром поза межами населеного пункту,бо вулиця нова,а в кадастрі інформація застаріла, або межа н.п.проходить буквально по лінії парканів крайньої вулиці залишаючи за межами саму вулицю,це не означає що ми повинні переносити помилки кадастру до своєї мапи.Якщо вам такі межі не до вподоби,можна їх виправити згідно з кадастром, оскільки ні назв вулиць ні адрес поки що нема, це не пинципово.
eggie (2018-03-14 19:36:33+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-14 19:39:36+00:00): "goeie actie". Benieuwd waar die straat vandaan komt.
Marcello66 (2018-03-14 20:51:04+00:00): Ik ook! Er bestaat wel een Loerangelsestraat, maar niet op die positie.
maraf24 (2018-03-14 22:36:06+00:00): Chyba maile nie docierają, znów kopiuj-wklej z urzędu.
Baloo Uriza (2018-03-15 01:31:15+00:00): I did change NorthWest to Northwest, but otherwise looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57188009
Alecs01 (2018-12-31 15:36:55+00:00): Un paio di altri telefoni cancellati dal solito "select" https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1465193434/history https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1989854862/history
johnny_1982 (2018-03-15 21:52:21+00:00): Dieser Änderungssatz entfernt die Information zu den lanes an Teilen des Bienroder Wegs. Vorher gab es auf Höhe der Wodanstraße korrekte lane-Daten. Nun nicht mehr. Bitte keine Daten zerstören, die du nicht verstehst. Ebenfalls falsch ist die Angabe zu den lanes auf der (fragwürdigen) Verkehrsinsel Höhe Freyastraße, Westseite. (Bereits früher kaputt gemacht.)
FreierFriese (2018-03-15 23:07:47+00:00): "Verbesserungen aller Art"?
Die lanes-Informationen Bienroder Weg Richtung Süden kurz vor Einmündung Freyastraße sind jetzt falsch. Die Busverbindungen Richtung Norden verlaufen auf der falschen Seite entgegen der Einbahnrichtung. Informationen zur Beleuchtung (lit=yes) wurden in den neu angelegten Abschnitten auch vergessen. 
Bitte nachbearbeiten. Danke!
Alecs01 (2018-12-31 16:25:31+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4361141822/history
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:19:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Jose Luis Infante (2018-03-14 20:50:44+00:00): Hola,
he modificado algunos de los comercios para indicar con más detalle el tipo de tienda u oficina. 
Puedes encontrar más tipos en:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:craft
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity
Un saludo!
viloan (2018-03-14 19:38:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
naoliv (2018-03-14 19:39:56+00:00): aljaab, de onde você obteve os nomes das ruas, por favor?
aljaab (2018-03-14 20:07:34+00:00): naoliv, Sou residente desta cidade, então conheço todas estas ruas, além do que meu trabalho me obriga a usá-las constantemente.
naoliv (2018-03-14 21:02:37+00:00): Pergunto porque os nomes estão iguais aos do Google, inclusive com alguns países tendo ausência de acento.
Não podemos copiar nomes do Google, com o risco de ter os dados removidos.
aljaab (2018-03-14 21:07:24+00:00): Entendido, mas os nomes estão iguais porque fui eu quem informou ao Google estes nomes.
Alecs01 (2018-12-31 16:25:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/443111319/history
roschitom (2018-03-14 21:43:16+00:00): Hallo,
warum verwendest du in Sachsen dieses grottige Bing zum Eintragen von Landnutzung, im JOSM sind auch die viel besseren Luftbilder von GeoSN verfügbar, unter Hintergrundbild kann man unter anderen Sachsen Luftbild aktuell auswählen.

Grüße ... roschitom
Thomas8122 (2018-03-18 08:58:05+00:00): Naja, normalerweise stimmt das, hier sind aber noch die HiRes-Bilder da. Zumindest in der höchsten Zoomstufe.
Gardke (2018-03-27 09:06:00+00:00): Danke das du die Frage aufgebracht hast. Mir sind die Luftbilder des GeoSN bekannt.
Laut des Eintrages für GeoSN auf dieser  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Permissions#ab_2008
Seite ist die Nutzung nicht möglich.
Aufgrund deiner Frage habe ich nochmal weiter gesucht und folgende Quellen gefunden die bestätigen, das die Daten im Moment nicht als Quelle genutzt werden dürfen:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53639

Der Stand dieser Wiki Seite ist glaube ich nicht aktuell:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GeoSN_Open_Data

Deswegen habe ich erst einmal die Finger davon gelassen. :-)
Wenn ihr mehr zum Thema wisst, dann würde ich mich über euer Feedback freuen.
Thomas8122 (2018-03-27 14:07:08+00:00): Das letzte was du verlinkt hast ist der aktuelle Stand, siehe auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=633243#p633243
Gardke (2018-03-27 17:19:05+00:00): Ok, gut zu wissen. Der Wiki Artikel https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Permissions
 sollte aktualisiert werden.
mueschel (2018-03-15 10:38:29+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded almost 3000 ways with only foreign tags on top of already existing roads. I guess this was a mistake?

    CENTERLINE=13864
    FULLNAME=S F M 866
    ROADCLASS=PrncplArt-Freeway
    Shape_STLe=9829.75042199
    last_edi_1=2017-04-28
    last_edite=ELANDRUM

Jan
hsc666 (2018-04-28 16:59:47+00:00): Hallo Beck East,

herzlich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Deine Beiträge sehen leider erfunden und nicht der Realität entsprechend aus. Die von dir verwendeten Tags passen nicht zum Luftbild oder sind unlogisch. Bitte trage in OpenStreetMap keine Dinge ein, die nicht der Realität entsprechen. Deine Änderungen habe ich soeben (teilweise) zurückgesetzt.

Siehe dazu auch (auf Deutsch) https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2016/12/30/tipps-fuer-neue-pokemon-go-mapper/?lang=de

Viele Grüße
hsc666
ftcat (2018-03-25 08:59:47+00:00): This is not a body of water, it is a seasonal wetland known in the region as a 'dambo'. During the rains it will be wet but during the dry season will be dry. they may have an intermittent seasonal stream through them but not always. Often they will be the source of larger rivers but sometimes just form in low lying areas.

Please consider reclassifying as seasonal wetland.
opendcc (2018-03-15 03:40:40+00:00): Obviously pokemon mapping, automatically reverted with changeset 57196763
maraf24 (2018-03-17 23:37:38+00:00): Wycofane.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-04-28 23:21:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58510954, 58506260, 58507519, 58514650, 58514174, 58505701, 58509392, 58500784, 58512130, 58515035, 58510461, 58506875, 58508734, 58513728, 58513212, 58511524, 58502701, 58504854, 58509968, 58508131, 58512688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting recent unedited changes by Bonya_23, see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4355762 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bonya_23/blocks for laundry list of issues; no communication.
Euskirchener (2018-03-14 20:59:52+00:00): Hallo hpduwe,
schön, dass hier neue Naturschutzgebiete eingetragen werden. Das würde ich gerne in meinem Mapping-Gebiet auch selber machen. Nur verwendest du laut 'source'-Angabe die WMS vom Land NRW. Soweit ich weiß, sind diese aber momentan für OSM nicht zum Abzeichnen erlaubt. Was nun …?
szydzio (2018-04-20 13:19:14+00:00): Hej rafalsocha!Niedawno edytowałeś mapę w tym zbiorze zmian (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/57190103).Wprowadziłeś zmianę szkoły i przemianowałeś ją na rzeźnię.Jeśli był to przypadkowy błąd to zapoznaj się na przyszłość z podpowiedziami na Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dschool) jak poprawnie edytować mapę.Jeśli potrzebujesz dalszej pomocy odwiedź np. forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=14985.Jeśli zaś nie był to przypadkowy błąd tylko celowe działanie to wiedz,że tego typu edycje traktujemy w OSM jako wandalizm i usuwamy.Jeśli w przyszłości będziesz celowo dokonywał podobnych edycji może to pociągnąć za sobą ograniczenia w możliwości dokonywania edycji aż do całkowitej blokady włącznie (ban).
user_7709782 (2018-04-20 13:57:26+00:00): Hej szydzio! Nie edytowałem w tym miesiącu mapy w tym zbiorze. Nie przemianowałem jej nazwy na błędną. ŻĄDAM PRZEPROSIN ZA BEZPODSTAWNE OSKARŻENIA! Jeżeli twoja zaczepka nie była przypadkowa, ale stanowiła celowe działanie to wiedz, że tego typu postępowanie traktujemy w OSM jako trolling. Jeśli w przyszłości będziesz celowo oskarżał kogoś, może to pociągnąć za sobą ograniczenia w możliwości dokonywania edycji aż do całkowitej blokady włącznie (ban).
szydzio (2018-04-20 14:32:46+00:00): Kolego!Rzeczowo i spokojnie.Przejrzyj historię obiektu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102632130/history
Widać w niej że dokonałeś tej edycji.Zwracanie sobie uwagi jest na OSM normalna rzeczą i wierz mi nikt za to nie dostanie bana.Natomiast za uporczywe błędne edycje już tak.Jesteś z tego co widać w historii edycji nowym maperem,dlatego do Ciebie napisałem.Na OSM zdarzają się też wandale, którzy celowo mniej lub bardziej świadomie psują dane.Przeanalizuj sytuację i daj mi rzeczową odpowiedź.Widzę też że przed chwilą dokonałeś kolejnej edycji https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58265377 dublując punkt adresowy na Polnej.W tagach do  Changesetu masz wpisy których nigdy wcześniej nie widziałem ideditor:walkthrough_progress= welcome - używasz może do edycji MAPS.ME ?
user_7709782 (2018-04-20 14:44:17+00:00): Szanowny Panie, niestety nie widzę edycji w której dokonałbym zmiany nazwy szkoły i przemianował ją na rzeźnię. W którym miejscu wskazanej strony jest taka informacja? Proszę o screen albo przyklejenie tekstu! Co do drugiej sprawy, edycja była standardowa w iD (w przeglądarce).
szydzio (2018-04-20 15:03:43+00:00): Hej!Tak jak pisałem- przejrzyj historię obiektu https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102632130/history - 3 zmiana od góry listy.Tutaj masz screena jeśli chcesz: https://ibb.co/etygWn.Pozdr!
szydzio (2018-04-20 15:06:17+00:00): adres screena jeszcze raz bo dokleiła mi się kropka : https://ibb.co/etygWn
user_7709782 (2018-04-20 15:08:04+00:00): https://ibb.co/etygWn
Ta strona nie istnieje
Żądana strona nie została znaleziona.

Traktuję to jako wkręcanie w jakąś zabawę. Kończę ten wątek, bo niestety nie mam więcej czasu.
szydzio (2018-04-20 19:50:49+00:00): Historia edycji https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102632130/history na OSM też pokazuje ci "Żądana strona nie została znaleziona" ? Version #7 konkretnie. Sprawdziłeś to? Prosze tu masz pełny link do screena skoro twierdzisz że skrócony rzekomo ci się nie wczytuje: https://preview.ibb.co/fQYFrn/01.jpg
user_4493657 (2018-04-20 20:30:56+00:00): W tej edycji http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=102632130 widać jaką szkodę wyrządził rafalsocha
user_4493657 (2018-04-20 20:40:10+00:00): miałem na myśli zmianę wykonał rafalsocha.
j03lar50n (2018-03-14 20:57:25+00:00): I'm not sure that is valid reasoning to remove this data. Please stop deleting the data. I think this changeset possibly warrants a revert. Have you broached this topic elsewhere? Is there another discussion happening that one can follow?
svdsrfr6 (2018-03-14 21:01:21+00:00): Believe me, I wish it could remain as I use it often.  There was an in-person meeting with the Forest Service a few days ago and one of the rangers was very upset about the trails on the ridge and actively wanted to block them.  I think it's a good idea to leave them off the map for awhile until things simmer down and the Forest Service comes up with an official plan for how they want to maintain West Ridge.
svdsrfr6 (2018-03-14 21:03:22+00:00): If you want to revert you can, I don't know much about openstreetmap, I'm just doing what I think is in the best interest of keeping the "off the radar" trails open rather than getting them blocked and creating hassles.
j03lar50n (2018-03-14 21:10:01+00:00): I will be reverting the deletion of this data. I understand your concern, but the physical features on the ground are what the Forest Service is worried about - not a digital map. Until things change - this map is a correct representation of what is on the ground...and many of us have put in a lot of time mapping it.
svdsrfr6 (2018-03-14 21:13:08+00:00): But a digital map is what makes people discover and ride the illegal trails, which is a large part of why the problem exists.  By mapping illegal trails, people think they're legal, and ride/maintain them.  According to the Forest Service that is illegal activity.  I really think illegal trails should be left off the map, so that users on OSM and other apps that use OSM data don't unwittingly ride/hike/maintain illegal trails.
svdsrfr6 (2018-03-14 21:15:40+00:00): Users have unwittingly followed the trails I deleted onto Camp San Luis (military) property and gotten $400 tickets, bikes confiscated, and misdemeanors on their records.  I don't think trails like that should be on OSM!
j03lar50n (2018-03-14 21:25:01+00:00): Fair points! But I really think that this should be discussed before outright deleting features. I also think that until the trail is physically blocked or altered on the ground - that these are legitimate features to include on the map. Perhaps their tags can be modified - have you explored doing that? Proceeding with revert
svdsrfr6 (2018-03-14 21:31:01+00:00): Gotcha - sorry, I didn't know about OSM etiquette and discussion capabilities.  I have not explored modifying tags, I'll look into it. I've never viewed tags when exploring the OSM map and doubt most users do.  Please consider the real-world implications of having these trails visible to the curious public and weigh that against the benefits.  These trails also lead people onto private ranch property and those property owners are currently complaining to the authorities about it (Sherriff and Forest Service).  Military trespass, Forest Service crackdown, fines, misdemeanors, these are all real-world implications of having these trails on OSM.  I really think they should not be publicized but will leave it up to you.  If someone built an illegal trail that crossed your property, and that data was put on OSM and it resulted in many others unwittingly trespassing on your land, how would you feel about having that trail on OSM?  That's the reality of this.
svdsrfr6 (2018-03-14 21:34:03+00:00): ...maybe you're already aware of this, but many trail guide apps pull data from OSM.  Ridewithgps.com and trailforks.com are two that come to mind but there are many others.  It's not just people seeing the trails here - they're seeing them on trail guide apps too, which is probably a bigger source of the problem rather than OSM itself.
j03lar50n (2018-03-14 21:43:15+00:00): Please take a look at tagging with the 'access' key https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access ...these _are_ still physical features, but it's up to whomever is rendering the data _how_ that data gets 'drawn'/rendered. If an app uses OSM data, it should make a distinction on trail segments that are 'private' etc. or not render them at all.
svdsrfr6 (2018-03-14 21:45:35+00:00): thank you!
hpanno (2018-03-14 21:47:25+00:00): I would hate to have features on the map deleted for lack of appropriate tagging. There are tags available that describe data as non-accessible. I would think that the responsibility falls on those who create the apps referencing any OSM data to filter and grab the appropriate data based on its attributes. Im not sure if this is an issue with the fact that the data exisits so much as it is an issue with how the data has been attributed. If the data is tagged incorrectly, that is an easy fix.
svdsrfr6 (2018-03-14 22:00:38+00:00): I think it's wiser to not map illegal trails at all, or trails that lead users to trespass on military land or private property, rather than to put the onus on those using the data.
pizzagal (2018-03-14 22:21:28+00:00): The difference between a footway and a pedestrian street is the scale and the importance.  A footway as defined by the osm wiki is  "used for mapping minor pathways which are used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians” and the requirements are "To map a footway nothing else than a simple way is required. Add the highway=footway tag to it and add a name=* if appropriate.”
A footway should be used to tag something like a path through a park or a trail.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway

A pedestrian street is higher profile and serves more purposes than just walking. The wiki defines it as "A highway=pedestrian is a road or an area mainly or exclusively for pedestrians in which some vehicle traffic may be authorized.”  
Pedestrian streets can be larger and be places like plazas or pedestrian malls, but if it serves a higher purpose and has the name infrastructure it should be labeled as a pedestrian street not a footway.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian

The pedestrian streets in Cali serve more purpose than just a sidewalk.  They have names and are the streets that people use to access their homes.