piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Peter Elderson (2019-10-25 06:19:48+00:00): Sommige LAW's zijn regionale paden. Zeker bijvoorbeeld het Noord-Hollandpad, het Overijssels Havezatenpad. Het Hertogenpad loopt bijna helamaal in Noord-Brabant, alleen het laatste stukje loopt naar Roermond door. Ik vind het dus een regionaal pad. Dat de markering wit-rood is is MI niet bepalend! Het Groot Frieslandpad vind ik dan weer wel een nationaalpad, want het loopt van Noord-Holland naar Ost-Friesland.
A67-A67 (2019-10-25 07:46:29+00:00): Dus je vertaalt regionaal naar provinciaal? Ik vind dat eigenlijk best arbitrair, zeker wanneer je een pad van 237 km als regionaal gaat zien omdat het pas aan het einde over de provinciegrens gaat. Dan vind ik de oorspronkelijke indeling meerdaags vs eendaags een stuk duidelijker of een indeling als law vs streekpad.
Peter Elderson (2019-10-25 08:39:06+00:00): Niet precies regionaal=provinciaal, maar als een pad (bijna gehaal) binnen 1 provincie blijft dan vind ik het zeker niet nationaal. Het Kempenpad vind ik ook regionaal, los van provincies en landsgrens, omdat de Kempen een regio is. En we hebben rwn nu ter beschikking.
Eendaags is meestal lokaal; de NS-wandelingen bijvoorbeeld zijn wit-rood en lokaal, maar regionale paden zijn normaal gesproken meerdaags. (Dat hangt dan ook weer af van de wandelaar natuurlijk, sommige kunnen 10 Km per dag anderen 40 kM of meer). Dus dat vind ik dan juist geen goed kriterium. LAW en SP zijn kreten van Wandelnet, die soms niet goed overeenkomen met de routes zelf. Beide zijn etappewandeltochten over lange afstand, maar het NoordHollandpad en het Overijssels Havezatenpad zijn qua bereik echt geen nationale routes. De lengte is geen goed kriterium, want het Brabants Vennenpad is ongeveer evenveel Km als het Havezatenpad.
Maar het is inderdaad arbitrair, er is niet 1 hard kriterium wat een regio is. Ik hou aan: een provincie is een regio, maar ook streken zoals de Veluwe, de Kempen, de Zuiderzee, de eifel, de Voerstreek.
A67-A67 (2019-10-25 08:43:23+00:00): Ik zou eerst een duidelijk criterium bedenken. Het is logisch als bijv. law's en streekpaden in één type vallen. De law's zijn typisch een nwn, zoals ook langeafstandsfietspaden ncn zijn. Dat er toevallig slechts één of juist meerdere provinciegrenzen in de route liggen, zegt weinig over het karakter van de route zelf.
Peter Elderson (2019-10-25 09:21:44+00:00): Het kriterium is de geografische scope. Dat Wandelnet om hun moverende redenen (administratie, boekjes, de padgroep ligt dwars, geen zin om alle markeringen te vervangen) daar soms van afwijkt boeit mij eigenlijk weinig! 
Zullen we het anders op het forum bespreken?
A67-A67 (2019-10-25 15:22:47+00:00): Dat lijkt me een goed idee. Het forum is een betere plek dan een changeset-comment.
Leo Slager (2019-10-25 21:46:16+00:00): review:
Ja, daar is geen enkel bezwaar tegen en het is wel zo duidelijk..
JesseSweder (2019-10-26 09:12:03+00:00): Dankjewel!
viloan (2019-10-24 20:15:27+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
FredrikLindseth (2019-10-25 08:20:24+00:00): Hei Hvaldemar,
Du må ikke fjerne egennavnet til alle butikkene i Molde. Vi fikk inn alle butikkene i hele Norge med navn på lik form så nå bryter du systemet. Hvis du har lyst å diskutere det kom gjerne innom IRC på kanalen til OSM norge https://webchat.oftc.net/?channels=osm-no
fanboy1986 (2019-10-24 20:20:14+00:00): #MicrosoftLife #OXOMapathon2019 #OXOGive #missingmaps #microsoft #OXOCanvasGraphics
freebeer (2019-10-25 04:38:14+00:00): what is this soup of pointless hashtags supposed to mean?

osm changeset descriptions, as well as comments thereto, are meant to describe what you have done or your intentions, for other mappers to understand.

i am totally unable to parse anything meaningful from this gibberish.

maybe i have gotten out of the wrong side of bed this morning, but this is bollocks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-07-20 15:57:51+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/375969741/history has hgv_articulated = Truck Route that was added in this edit
What this tag means? This access value is unusual
GinaroZ (2019-10-24 21:51:08+00:00): What was the problem, and is it now sorted?
sbrat (2019-10-27 13:51:55+00:00): Hey.

Sorted = yes.

Background:  I was working here, https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=17/56.18737/-2.84948, when I noticed that someone had mapped the beach at low tide rather than high per instructions here to mark at high tide: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=coastline  I started the job then realised it was much larger than expected and it was getting late.  Better to roll it back and look at it again another time when I have the time to do it properly.

Thanks for checking though - I appreciate it!

-S
GinaroZ (2019-10-27 20:43:22+00:00): Thanks for the explanation. However I don't see anything on that page about how to map a beach, and also the coastline is mapped correctly at MWHS.
sbrat (2019-10-27 23:04:04+00:00): You are correct - wrong link.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbeach   I didn't touch the coastline - I touched the beach only and only those beaches mapped down to the low tide mark.

Example:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=16/56.1922/-2.8720  

Previously:  Beach was mapped down to the coastline = low tide. 
Now:  Beach mapped at high tide and large tidal bay added as wetland/tidal + surface/sand.

Have I done something wrong?  Beach mapped at high tide line appears to be the same way its mapped round other parts of Scotland ...
sbrat (2019-10-27 23:17:21+00:00): Maybe this is better still ...

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dsand

"flat areas with a sand surface that are water covered at high tide but exposed at low tide - use natural=wetland + wetland=tidalflat + surface=sand instead."
user_5359 (2019-10-25 05:08:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property.

I have reverted your change set. Please try again to mark the place of your address (and not the street) to add your  inormation.
user_5359 (2019-10-25 05:09:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice an address is part of the building instead of the highway.
benitoboop (2019-10-25 14:11:41+00:00): Yes, I am sorry, my comment was wrong
aharvey (2019-10-25 06:30:25+00:00): Thanks, I updated one of these restrictions to simply except=bus instead of except=psv as per the sign https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/9mbQx7OPz81_3dFNfvv2fQ this only excepts busses not other psv vehicles like taxis. Is that right?
Geosmalley (2019-10-28 20:32:28+00:00): please make sure you right-click, then square your buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76174967
aquarix (2019-11-03 01:01:02+00:00): Hallo Anoniman,
mich würde interessieren, wofür du bei einigen Straßen das Tag lanes=2 durch lanes:backward=1 + lanes:forward=1 ersetzt hast. 
Dafür besteht aus meiner Sicht und laut Wiki nur dann ein Anlass, wenn die Anzahl der Spuren in eine Richtung ungleich der in die andere Richtung ist. Ein Beispiel wäre bei einer Abbiegespur. 
Bei einer normalen Straße mit einem Fahrstreifen pro Richtung ist das unnötig kompliziert. 
Wir setzen ja auch nicht generell das Tempolimit pro Fahrtrichtung, nur weil es einzelne Stellen gibt wo es nicht identisch ist.
Gruß aquarix
Anoniman (2019-11-03 18:46:30+00:00): Hallo aquarix,
ist korrigiert, siehe 76559372 & 76559446
Danke für den Hinweis.
Bei der Bearbeitung war es für mich einfacher, entlang der Route erst mal alle befahrenen Straßen mit lanes:forward/backward=1 zu versehen und danach bei Bedarf die Werte anzupassen.
Grüße Anoniman
arjunaraoc (2019-10-25 04:21:30+00:00): Welcome.  Landuse need not be contained in administrative boundaries. for example for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/738364011#map=18/10.94956/76.09477 could spread even to neighboring administrative areas.
viloan (2019-10-24 21:52:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
BCNorwich (2019-10-25 06:48:36+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Sorry but putting the address of a feature not yet existing is incorrect especially placing in in the middle of a highway.

You could place a node (POI) at the approximate location and tag it as a proposed feature, preferably with a name  and descriptive tags.

The address ought be removed from the highway. Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Rocco Alessandro Noviello (2019-10-25 07:30:37+00:00): Hi Bernard,

the address is not on the highway at all. It's on Minnie Baldock Street which is a pedestrian street. The feature doesn't exist yet but the address does exist. It's just an empty retail unit at the moment but it's there.

Please do not remove the address.

Thanks
BCNorwich (2019-10-25 09:02:59+00:00): Hi, the node that holds the address data is part of the highway, a pedestrian street is a highway=pedestrian. Therefore you have incorrectly placed a features data (the cafe) on a part of a highway. Further it seems the feature does not yet exist, so it is incorrectly tagged anyway, (it is at best a proposed feature).

If the unit exists then it would be correct to map the unit tagging it as disused with the address as a proposed cafe.

The address data should be removed from the highway. 

Can you point to where the disused is please?
Regards Bernard.
Rocco Alessandro Noviello (2019-10-25 16:28:15+00:00): Hi Bernard,

the disused is exactly where the number 15 is on the map. At the intersection between Minnie Baldock Street and Sylvia Pankhurst Street. The entrance is in the building block east of Minnie Baldock Street (Hallsvile Quarter side).

I'm new here so I'm not exactly sure how to tag the address correctly.
All I'm trying to do is to make sure that when I use this address on Facebook, the pin doesn't wrongly appear a different area of London.

Thanks
BCNorwich (2019-10-25 17:03:41+00:00): Hi,
Your address data in in the 

Using OSM to make Facebook look good is not what OSM is for, that is called mapping for the renderer. OSM contributors are not to do this, please see this page :- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer 

OSM is a factual database that must be verifiable by everyone. If there is not a feature/structure in the middle of the pedestrian highway then the incorrectly placed data should be removed. Or you could correctly map a feature with that data.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2019-10-25 17:05:32+00:00): Sorry the first line above should read "Your address data is in the middle of a highway."
Rocco Alessandro Noviello (2019-10-26 08:53:30+00:00): Hi Bernard,

thanks for taking the time to explain everything to me. It took me a while to get my head around. I have created a new feature away from the highway and I have tagged it as "planned", I hope that's ok now.

Thanks
Glassman (2019-10-24 23:35:41+00:00): Tip: don't use descriptive names, like name=sidewalk. The tags should speak for the feature.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76175647
Glassman (2019-10-24 23:46:03+00:00): I also corrected the sidewalk that crossed a number of service roads without a connection. Whenever a sidewalk crosses a road they should be connected. This allows routers to use both. 

Also - The sidewalk didn't follow the aerial imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76175647
Glassman (2019-10-24 23:52:15+00:00): The Filipino American Community Hall building way too large to be a building. Can you fix it?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76175647
Glassman (2019-10-25 00:00:48+00:00): The boat launch can not be oneway without out an exit. It's either two way or there is an exit. I removed the oneway designation. 

I changed the boat ramp from highway=unclassified to highway=service. unclassified is basically residential roads in rural areas. Thank the Brits for this. Since OSM started in England, we use British terminology/language for tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76175647
user_5359 (2019-10-25 08:30:08+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kurzer Hinweis die Adresse ist kein Bestandteil der Fleischerei, sie bleibt auch nach Schließung des Geschäftes noch gültig (schon repariert).
Baloo Uriza (2020-08-06 04:24:11+00:00): Feeling like US 50 is a little overrated as a trunk; that value tends to be used as an indication that something's almost but not quite a motorway, not a two lane federal highway.  Compare US 69 in Oklahoma.
abakus_uploader (2019-10-25 22:31:53+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2019-10-25 22:31:54+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
aharvey (2019-10-25 01:30:20+00:00): https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/530746983 is still a pedestrian "sidewalk" so can you re-add that tag that you deleted back in?
Nathjg (2019-10-25 01:33:16+00:00): It's a shared path from Ashley St down through Muston Park over to Orara St.
Nathjg (2019-10-25 01:36:18+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/gEgzJG2_s0-O32W1hP0m_Q
aharvey (2019-10-25 01:38:00+00:00): Yes but for a pedstrian it's also still a footpath, in OSM footway=sidewalk http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:footway=sidewalk is used to map footways which are the sidewalk.
Nathjg (2019-10-25 01:38:26+00:00): This shared path sign not clear but the arrow points to the path leading into Muston Park:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/NOj5Daqz5NHPGSZDJhFGpg
Nathjg (2019-10-25 01:39:36+00:00): Am I allowed to link to Google Street View?
https://goo.gl/maps/RTeUtng5LzSTLA7z5
Nathjg (2019-10-25 01:40:05+00:00): https://goo.gl/maps/W1uxCtwkF9UcWw6g9
Nathjg (2019-10-25 01:42:01+00:00): Hmm. So it's both a Footway and a Cycleway.
So should I just select 'Cycle & Foot Path'?
Nathjg (2019-10-25 01:50:57+00:00): Sorry for so many errors. Hopefully I'm getting there?
As OSM is the map provider of choice for a lot of bike who ride bikes, was hoping to link up and correct a lot of the missing shared paths and cycleways on the Northern Beaches and North Shore.
I was attempting to find a route from Cammeray to Freshy using OsmAnd+ but it just wouldn't take me the routes I knew existed for bikes so thought I might try and correct myself.
Thanks for your patience.
aharvey (2019-10-25 05:06:39+00:00): Oh yeah please feel welcome to keep up with your contributions.

In this case, even though bicycles are allowed here, it's still a footpath on the ground from a pedestrian perspective. We have this tag footway=sidewalk which says this footway is a sidewalk since it runs alongside the road, it's useful for some downstream data users.

So just because bicycles can also ride here, doesn't change the fact that it's a "sidewalk" footway. I see now you've added that footway=sidewalk tag back in thanks.

However at https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/530746983 you've added cycleway=sidepath, was that something you found documented somewhere? footway=sidewalk should be enough.
arjunaraoc (2019-10-25 05:18:38+00:00): Nice work.
5m4u9 (2019-10-25 07:59:08+00:00): hola, he revertido este cambio porque altera el limite municipal recientemente actualizado, hay que evitar mover los puntos o dibujar uniendo calles y otros...

al editar en ID hay que ocultar los boundaries para que ya no se cometa estos errores, la opción es presionando la tecla F y descliqueando "boundaries"
aharvey (2019-10-25 01:28:48+00:00): What were you trying to change here? The tunnel was already mapped and it seemed your change moved the surface tags to the wrong place, so I've reverted this.

https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76176736
woodpeck (2019-10-25 12:21:47+00:00): Dear Mappuccino, may I ask what logic you apply in selecting which buidings to align and which not? In this changeset you have moved three buldings and the "Topolica" road, but not the other buildings which were equally offset from Maxar imagery. The result is a jumble with some buildings aligned to one, some buildings to other imagery (cf. //www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/tuzla.jpg) - arguably the situation was better before your edit, because even assuming it was wrong before, at least everything was equally wrong! Your moving of the garage or shed between houses #2 and #4 has even led to it intersecting with the building at house #2. What is your mission here?
Mappuccino (2019-10-25 23:14:40+00:00): Hi Frederik,

I was fixing a kink in the road and aligning it better and moved a few buildings that overlapped the newer alignment, but see I left an overlapping building. In general we try to fix the most egregious errors in an area, and I was getting a number of conflicts in this area while mapping, which appeared to be local users editing at the same time so I moved on. I will take your feedback into account for future editing. 

Thanks.
aharvey (2019-10-25 01:32:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign doesn't indicate what a name tag on the destination_sign relation means, but the name you've used here seems more like a description than a proper name. Are you sure they need a name at all?
ortho_is_hot (2019-10-25 09:37:21+00:00): My thought process was that with a lot of different relations around here it would be beneficial to have "Destination sign to xyz" show up rather than relation 12345, in iD at least. Although granted, they don't specifically need a name
aharvey (2019-10-25 10:45:27+00:00): Ha I've seen tagging for the renderer, tagging for the router, but never tagging for the editor UI in this way before. I think it's better addressed by the editor UI being smart and generating a name like this based on the relation type.

I mean it's not harmful how you have it, since the name tag shouldn't really mean anything in this context.
ortho_is_hot (2019-10-25 12:50:24+00:00): I'll admit, I was expecting you to say something like that. Although you are spot on—iD doesn't recognise this tag yet for whatever reason. 

Might have to put a GH issue to add this as a feature.
aharvey (2019-10-25 01:35:29+00:00): Do you know why https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/246596679/history was deleted? It's best practice to try and retain history where possible? So generally it's always best to reuse existing ways rather than deleting them as we loose the history of the object when it's deleted.
Nathjg (2019-10-25 01:44:13+00:00): Sorry. Will keep that in mind for future updates.
G1asshouse (2019-12-07 08:05:17+00:00): I have surveyed the area and I do not understand the added turn restriction from Northeast 50th Street to the alley between Brooklyn Ave NE and University Way NE. I'd be interested in the reason for the restriction otherwise could you please revert the changeset.
Anu_Zade (2019-12-10 00:35:48+00:00): Hello G1asshouse,
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. It was not my intention to add the turn restriction here. Here is the link to the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/59713094 and the Changeset 76177138. Please feel free to take a look. I appreciate your help and will make sure to avoid these situations in the future.
Thank you,
Anu_lyft
user_5359 (2019-10-25 05:24:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Fr a better description of your business please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare#Specialities_for_healthcare.3Dcounselling
muralito (2019-11-02 20:47:55+00:00): Por favor, respetá el trabajo de los demás. Como ya te avisaron, te reitero que no ca mbies LOS NOMBRES en TODO MAYUSCULAS.
mueschel (2019-10-27 11:30:49+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag "tactile_pad"?
It's not defined in the Wiki.

Jan
TaskarCenterAtUW (2019-10-27 14:40:59+00:00): Hi Jan,

I actually do not typically use this tag. 
I saw it inside the proposal for foot path in parking aisle 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access_aisle

To me, the tag seems to mean specifically a ‘landing area that is tactile for demarcation and increase traction’. I like it because it’s more specific than tactile_paving, but you’re correct that I didn’t realize it wasn’t in the wiki. I will stop using it for now, and put in a proposal on the wiki. 

Thanks!