piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Shaun das Schaf (2022-06-10 20:03:11+00:00): Hallo Humppakarajat, willkommen bei OSM!

Bei deinen beiden Änderungen hast du folgende Zugangsberechtigungen gesetzt: foot=yes, bicycle=yes, horse=yes und motor_vehicle=designated.

Die ersten drei sind unnötig, da highway=track diese bereits impliziert. Sie brauchen in Deutscland nur explizit getaggt zu werden, wenn der erlaubte Zugang vom gesetzlichen Standard abweicht. Wenn also z.B. ein Verbotsschild dort steht, dann z.B. bicycle=no taggen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

motor_vehicle=designated ist dagegen falsch. Es würde bedeuten, dass diese Wege explizit Motorfahrzeugen gewidmet sind. Genauere Beschreibung hierzu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Ddesignated

Ich habe das mal korrigiert.

Noch eine andere Frage: Bist du sicher, dass die beiden von dir eingetragenen Wege smoothness=very_horrible sind? Das würde bedeuten, die Wege sind so schlimm dass man dort nur noch mit einem Traktor oder Panzer o.ä. vorankommt. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:smoothness

Bei diesem Weg hier hast du außerdem surface=compacted, also eine verdichtete Wegoberfläche angegeben. Das widerspricht sich irgendwie mit tracktype=grade4 und smoothness=horrible.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:surface%3Dcompacted
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Humppakarajat (2022-06-10 20:45:55+00:00): Hi Shaun,

vielen Dank für Deine Hilfe. Das war mein erster Beitrag, deshalb war ich mir nicht sicher, ob ich alles richtig gemacht habe.

Also für PKWs ist der Weg völlig ungeeignet. Da braucht man ordentlich Bodenfreiheit, wie sie z.B. ein Traktor hat. G-Klasse würde auch noch gehen, denke ich.

Viele Grüße
Allison P (2022-06-10 22:53:56+00:00): Please square buildings after drawing them by pressing Q or right-clicking and selecting the square option.
Anton Valodzin (2022-06-14 07:36:21+00:00): Hi, I am edited building outlines based on Bing Arial Images
Allison P (2022-06-14 08:56:30+00:00): They are built with right-angle corners. This can be seen from the aerial photos.
Anton Valodzin (2022-06-15 06:47:40+00:00): Hi! So, me once more edited building outlines based on Bing Arial Images
porfiriopaiz (2022-06-13 00:30:48+00:00): Por favor, para agregar el nombre común del árbol, usar la etiqueta species:es = Nombre común, donde Nombre común es el nombre común de las especie.

Por favor leer la wiki de OpenStreetMap sobre este tema en particular:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree

Esta será la última vez que corregiré este tipo de cambios. No me cuesta nada, pero no veo interés genuino de parte de ustedes en mejorar la calidad de la contribuciones.

En la siguiente ocasión simplemente revertiré los cambios.

Saludos,
Porfirio
kalupner (2022-06-11 06:20:08+00:00): Ich bin gespannt was bei B passiert?
Weshalb wurden die deutschen Namen gelöscht?
berndw (2022-06-11 08:26:04+00:00): Ich habe das Changeset im Forum thematisiert, da ich es als suspekt ansehe
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=864777#p864777
user_16236340 (2022-06-11 09:19:22+00:00): https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Gemeinden_nach_Anteil_der_sorbischsprachigen_Bev%C3%B6lkerung

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obersorbisches_Kernsiedlungsgebiet

Diese Gebiete sind mehrheitlich sorbisch.
berndw (2022-06-11 11:36:42+00:00): Oh, der  User hat seinen Account gelöscht. 

Ein lokaler Mapper sollte hier ein Revert nach Kontrolle durchführen.
User9991 (2022-06-11 12:58:35+00:00): hmm
User9991 (2022-06-11 12:58:57+00:00): sus
berndw (2022-06-11 15:49:51+00:00): Revert mit Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122254999
letihu (2022-11-03 21:10:09+00:00): Was könnte dies
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068640211/history#map=17/52.20934/13.52514&layers=N
sein?
A67-A67 (2022-06-11 12:06:13+00:00): Hoi Jeroen,

Weet je zeker dat deze R-wegen nog bestaan? Ik had deze bewust niet toegevoegd, omdat ze niet meer op de bewegwijzering voor lijken te komen.
JeroenvanderGun (2022-06-11 20:01:11+00:00): r101 t/m r104 wel, van r105 kon ik geen beeld meer vinden. Het zijn wel allemaal oude wegwijzers.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.3827049&lng=3.5169779999722&z=17&dateFrom=2019-01-01&pKey=143072734457115&x=0.5312288694844715&y=0.6431852209701641&zoom=0&focus=photo
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.371349899972&lng=3.4739121&z=17&dateFrom=2019-01-01&pKey=522560662106200&focus=photo&x=0.5083566437210987&y=0.5760016193758403&zoom=0
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.366746399972&lng=3.461298&z=17&dateFrom=2019-01-01&pKey=478777326781383&focus=photo
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.350824&lng=3.4297678999722&z=17&dateFrom=2019-01-01&pKey=3917666598315197&focus=photo
A67-A67 (2022-06-13 14:45:43+00:00): Bedankt, dan lijkt het nog wel te kloppen.

Ik zie dat verschillende gemeenten heel verschillende denken over S- en R-routes. Sommige schaffen ze af of laten ze 'uitsterven'. Andere beginnen een nieuw netwerk.
porfiriopaiz (2022-06-13 04:09:54+00:00): He cambiado la etiqueta species por la etiqueta species:es, también he corregido el valor de dicha etiqueta para que haga uso de una letra mayúscula al inicio del nombre común de la especie.

Cualquier nueva modicación o elemento agregado que no se ajuste a la guía disponible en la wiki será revertido.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree

Porfirio
rene78 (2022-06-11 08:43:23+00:00): Hi pasi,

danke für Deine ganzen Beiträge in letzter Zeit!

Einen kleinen Tipp wollte ich geben: Wenn ich neue Gebäude einzeichne aktiviere ich häufig das Bildmaterial "Maps4BW". Dort sind die Gebäudeumrisse sehr akkurat abgebildet und man muss sie bloss noch nachzeichnen.

Ciao
René
_pasi (2022-06-11 15:36:09+00:00): Hallo René,

danke für den Tipp.
Werd ich beim nächste mal so machen und ggf. die Gebäude nachziehen :)

Grüße
Tilia_J (2022-06-11 09:17:20+00:00): Goedemorgen, Ik zie dat je de nodige bospercelen hebt samengevoegd terwijl ik dit gebied een jaar terug volledig onderhanden heb genomen.

Deze percelen worden o.a. in opentopomap gewoon getoond en vormen vaak de begrenzing van verschillende vegetatietypes of afgesloten maar nog zichtbare paden.

Ik zou het op prijs stellen als je deze detaillering in het vervolg in stand houdt.
4004 (2022-06-12 22:22:28+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
основное имя должно быть на русском или беларускай, на англ - в name:en.
часы служб действительно с 4 ночи?
4004 (2022-06-12 22:22:56+00:00): Международное общество сознания Кришны - из названия надо перенести в оператор
Atmayoni das (2022-06-13 06:01:35+00:00): Утренняя служба в 4:15. Прихожане приходят к этому времени
Atmayoni das (2022-06-13 06:06:40+00:00): Насчет перенести в оператор не понятно. И не понятно, почему визуально на карте не отображается изменение названия
4004 (2022-06-13 16:49:41+00:00): понятно, 4 так 4.
в оператор перенесу сам - там указывается, кто поддерживает работу. последняя правка была у вас 3 дня назад, название из нее я и вижу на карте на сайте
BCNorwich (2022-06-12 06:24:19+00:00): Hi, Somehow the building outline got duplicated, it might not have been yourself. Anyway, problem is fixed and I've updated the bakery tags.

Regards Bernard.
user_2066394 (2022-06-11 10:29:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345077223
Verläuft der Weg tatsächlich unterirdisch (layer=-1)?

Zur Fehlerbehebung würde es schon reichen, den Weg aus dem Gebäude rauszuschieben.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247371417
baumann3141 (2022-06-11 02:25:06+00:00): Thanks for finding that!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122228611
totera (2022-06-12 23:42:51+00:00): Ciao sorcrosc, qual è il motivo per cui hai eliminato i tag dei semafori in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9330800769/history e https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9330800770/history ?
sorcrosc (2022-06-13 19:26:43+00:00): Ciao. Se ho interpretato bene sono semafori solo per gli attraversamenti pedonali. Ero convinto che in questi casi i semafori non andavano mappati separatamente ma vedo che c'è un esempio anche per questi:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#How_to_map_(new)
Li ho aggiunti. Grazie.

Lorenzo
totera (2022-06-13 20:02:31+00:00): Grazie a te. Anch'io per molto tempo ho usato un solo nodo, ma in effetti le linee di arresto per i veicoli non coincidono con le strisce pedonali per cui i tre nodi sono sicuramente una mappatura più dettagliata!
rmikke (2022-06-10 21:29:46+00:00): A, może i nie wandalizm, po bliższym przyjrzeniu się wygląda raczej na uczciwą pomyłkę ;)
hardycross3 (2022-06-14 05:41:38+00:00): Where do you get the information of these
E de Wit (2022-06-10 21:55:28+00:00): Hi,

You do realise with source=Fastned (OCPI) a dataset was used for all Fastned charging stations (with permission from Fastned)?
By the looks you're not updating any sockets or socket types, so why changing the source to https://fastnedcharging.com/nl/locaties en masse?

-E de Wit
E de Wit (2022-06-10 21:58:18+00:00): Dataset with documentation:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Permissions_Europe
wvdp (2022-06-12 11:13:10+00:00): I got the locations for the Fastned chargers from that site. And use maproulete as a personal todo list. The task is unlisted. 
 
What I do is I look at other sources, mainly background images, because of the distinctive roof shape. But also mapillary to see if the charger is there.
 
There won't be many changes in this case and in many other cases because it was a good import in the first place.
 
 I think that if there is a change, then the sources should be combined.
 
There are also some chargers that are not on the map jet, so then the source tag makes sense
 
I hope this clarifies my process.
-wvdp
E de Wit (2022-06-12 20:00:53+00:00): Thanks for clarifying your process.

The sources were being replaced by the Fastned website location link and I think what poorly represents where the import came from.
It's just a small issue, but I thought I should bring it to your attention.

I'm completely fine with combining sources with the known ; method. For new chargers your source use makes sense, after all that's where your information came from.

-E de Wit
user_15661662 (2022-08-22 09:39:38+00:00): Pardon, but why there's a question mark on the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155022496 ? Someone asked me that question marks should better not shown within name (unless it's really shown in that real world place).
Jojo4u (2022-12-02 19:48:04+00:00): Hallo Enzyklopädix, pass bitte mit dem Tag foot/bicycle=no auf. Es heißt dass Fußgänger/Radfahrer ausdrücklich verboten sind (z.B. STVO Zeichen 259). Meist ist dies nicht der Fall! Aufgrund deiner vielen Verwendung von foot=no hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14328069 für Fußgänger gesperrt obwohl ein Bürgersteig vorhanden ist. In Stuttgart ist die Kerninfrastruktur meist gut gemappt, ein fehlendes foot=no/bicycle=no sollte es selten geben. Wenn der Bürgersteig separat gemappt ist und in der Nähe (üblicherweise max 5m entfernt) verwende foot=use_sidepath.
Jojo4u (2022-12-03 23:24:11+00:00): Ein Bsp. wo deine Edits zu einer Verschlechterung geführt haben ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299389577/ Dort ist Radfahren ausdrücklich erlaubt! Vgl. https://dasfahrradblog.blogspot.com/2021/01/wer-starke-nerven-hat.html
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-30 13:38:12+00:00): Hi JuanMelo,

I am curious, is this some kind of data import or what's the source of your mapping? Thanks.

Best,
Pascal
JuanMelo (2022-07-31 20:45:18+00:00): Hi, as you can see in the souce is information gotten from open data IGAC
pitscheplatsch (2022-08-01 05:46:05+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

Is this import documented in our OSM wiki? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
jnighan (2022-06-28 15:02:19+00:00): Hi, Olcott Street West should not be tagged access=private. This is a municipal, public road. It should not have access=private, even though it is a dead end, and even though there is only one house on this road.
mariotomo (2022-06-10 21:56:36+00:00): hola. no sé cuál sería la clasificación correcta, pero cuidado con el uso del 'name' para describir las cosas.
En la base de datos OSM: el objeto "building" contiene (es huésped) el grupo editorial.  El grupo editorial tiene nombre, y no coincide con el edificio en que trabaja.  no sé cuál sería la etiqueta correcta para un grupo editoria.  quizás buscar otros ejemplos? Elsevier? el Washington Post? Springer?
mariotomo (2022-06-10 22:00:32+00:00): office=publisher; https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9596731583
skyper (2023-01-25 23:20:40+00:00): Hi zzptichka,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9809894069 is probably only a `man_made=tower` or even `man_made=mast`, see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22677.
We are looking for a solution to the incorrect use of `man_made=communications_tower`. Do you have any hint for us?

Regards,
skyper
zzptichka (2023-01-26 03:06:16+00:00): Yeah probably you are right. Changed it to `man_made=mast`
skyper (2023-01-26 21:30:00+00:00): Thanks
mariotomo (2022-06-12 04:19:20+00:00): hey ... have you looked at the detailed feedback you and your group received, and all corrections performed on your input?
porfiriopaiz (2022-06-13 04:41:00+00:00): He corregido todos los errores que he encontrado.

El próximo de los cambios con estos mismos errores simplemente revertiré.
mariotomo (2022-06-13 14:11:30+00:00): Si bien entendí el espíritu del proyecto, este tiene una importante faceta de aprendizaje. Revertir los errores que demuestran que no hubo aprendizaje, creo que sea la cosa más constructiva.
mariotomo (2022-06-12 04:21:56+00:00): hey! we've reviewed, suggested, explained, corrected, and you're sgain adding data as if you hadn't received any feedback!
PT-53 (2022-06-21 08:58:47+00:00): Hallo Hanser,
an diesen Straßenabschnitten fehlt wohl noch das Merkmal
- oneway=yes

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Stanjan (2022-06-21 18:50:31+00:00): Hey, meinst Du das?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221914177
Ist mir selber einen Tag später (im rendering) aufgefallen und hab ich direkt behoben.
Oder sind noch weitere Fehler? – Würde ich mich gerne darum kümmern.
Danke für den Hinweis!
PT-53 (2022-06-22 03:57:34+00:00): Hallo Hanser, 
es geht um diese beiden Straßenabschnitte:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26162547/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1068669946/history

Danke für die Rückmeldung und Sorry für die vergessenen Links.

Grüße
Stanjan (2022-06-22 20:48:49+00:00): Hab's behoben: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122728694

Hatte solche Angst, bei der Änderung die Relationen zu verzocken und deshalb dabei sehr viel Sorgfalt walten lassen. Leider blieb dann nicht genug für die Einbahnstraßen-Markierung übrig, danke für's Melden! ;)
Leo Slager (2022-06-10 22:34:58+00:00): Door het verkeersbord C12 was de tagging met onewaY=yes feitelijk correct.
ik pas het even aan.
Leo Slager (2022-06-11 09:46:01+00:00): Is hier het verkeersbord ook verwijderd ?
Ik vind daarvan geen verkeersbesluit van de gemeente, vandaar mijn reactie.
Erik Frèrejean (2022-06-11 09:54:27+00:00): Correct, dit bord staat er ook niet. Ik woon hier nu anderhalf jaar en het is al die tijd 2 richting geweest. Ik heb geen idee wanneer de borden verwijderd zijn.
StevieSteves (2022-06-11 00:45:31+00:00): Distinction between "natural woods" in Darby Hall and "residential area" immediately southeast of its border seems arbitrary or perhaps reversed. Darby's Hall's chartered border is the tree line, which is seemingly is where the natural wood area is distinguished as ending rather than beginning.
Lemetiou (2022-06-11 12:13:19+00:00): Agree, these natural woods in largely-developed surroundings are tricky. I'm largely agnostic on how to handle these tree save common areas maintained by homeowners' associations. In this case, the natural area is a combination of three Darby Hall parcels bordering the single family home to the southeast (https://polaris3g.mecklenburgcountync.gov/#mat=92092&pid=21150118&gisid=21150118). It could pretty easily be added to the Darby Hall residential area, or one could overlay wooded areas on the residential areas.

Wooded common areas maintained by HOAs are reasonably less likely to be redeveloped or cleared than trees on a single landowner's lot, so it's potentially less maintenance to map them now.
Your Village Maps (2022-08-03 00:16:56+00:00): Regarding Trans Haryana Expressway: This is now complete and open to traffic and I would map it as such but am unable to map the interchanges due to aerial imagery being not recent enough. I assume you, or someone in India, could use GPS to map it?
RedEyedVireo (2022-06-10 22:58:22+00:00): This changeset changes two small sections of MA2 from highway=trunk to highway=motorway as there is no discernible difference (road width, # of lanes, speed limit) between the sections that were tagged as trunk and the sections that were and still are tagged as motorway. If there is a reason why the highway=trunk sections were tagged as such please let me know and I can change it back.
fndoder (2022-06-12 07:59:06+00:00): Не нужно дублировать значение тега name в name:ru внутри РФ.
Это вредная избыточность, приводящая к ошибкам из-за того, что далее пользователям приходится править оба тега.
vasony (2022-07-01 20:43:42+00:00): Hello!
Miller Dávid köz név honnan van? 
Ilyen nem létezik hivatalosan.
Tamás
teteny-ohegy (2022-07-01 23:25:54+00:00): Szia!
Sehonnan, egy fogadás eredménye volt, kíváncsiak voltunk meddig marad :)
Hozzánk tartozó magánút, így gondoltuk nem lesz belőle nagy baj.
Törlöm is.
Emiliano
user_2092025 (2022-06-13 19:37:09+00:00): Czy ta droga naprawdę nazywa się "Za Akademikami"?
https://osm.org/way/176000223
Nie znam takiej ulicy.
SchockerPL (2022-06-13 19:55:25+00:00): Nie jest to nazwa oficjalna, nie ma jej w ULIC, ale lokalna społeczność PŁ nazywa tak ten obszar odkąd pamiętam (a kontakt bieżący z tą społecznością mam od 2015 włącznie). W mojej ocenie nadanie takiej nazwy jest w zgodzie z zasadą "On the ground": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule
jleedev (2022-06-14 14:12:02+00:00): Vandalism, reverted.
Mariusz189 (2022-12-20 17:59:42+00:00): Tak, znajduje się tutaj szkoła :) Prowadzę  import szkół na razie tylko województwo lubelskie. Jak chciałbyś pomóc mogę wytłumaczyć jak to się robi. Zaktualizowałem dane tej szkoły. Pozdrawiam Mariusz.
ZLima12 (2022-09-17 19:27:57+00:00): Hi again,

Just commented on one of your other changesets. Again, I unfortunately had to revert parts of this changeset. I doubt that any speed limit signs would apply to the parking lots here, so I've removed the maxspeed tag from the ways within them. I've retained the speed limits on the more prominent roads here,  though.

Let me know if you have any questions!

-John
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122232822
ZLima12 (2022-09-17 19:25:35+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM. I appreciate that you separated out each of your modifications to different changesets, it helps immensely with reviewing them.

In the case of this changeset, I've had to revert part of it. Most of the roads that you marked as tertiary don't meet the requirements for this tag. I did make one exception to the revert, that being Service Center Road between Audubon Parkway and Flint Road. It does serve as a bit more of a connector, so I've tagged it as unclassified. This is similar to tertiary, but for roads that are less important. Flint Road is tertiary, and you'd likely agree that Service Center Road is less important than it. Thus, the unclassified tag makes sense here.

Sorry to have to revert some of your work here, but if you want to keep mapping, feel free to ask me for advice! I'd be happy to help.

-John
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122232878
ZLima12 (2022-09-17 19:26:07+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for contributing to OSM. I appreciate that you separated out each of your modifications to different changesets, it helps immensely with reviewing them.

In the case of this changeset, I've had to revert part of it. Most of the roads that you marked as tertiary don't meet the requirements for this tag. I did make one exception to the revert, that being Service Center Road between Audubon Parkway and Flint Road. It does serve as a bit more of a connector, so I've tagged it as unclassified. This is similar to tertiary, but for roads that are less important. Flint Road is tertiary, and you'd likely agree that Service Center Road is less important than it. Thus, the unclassified tag makes sense here.

Sorry to have to revert some of your work here, but if you want to keep mapping, feel free to ask me for advice! I'd be happy to help.

-John
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122232878
cserpell (2022-06-14 15:58:34+00:00): Estimado,

Volví a agregar la etiqueta residencial a esta zona. No es excluyente a la etiqueta barrio.

Saludos,
目立たない (2023-11-28 08:10:41+00:00): satellite image dated 2023-11-11 shows a field, not a new store.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122234467
felipeeugenio (2022-06-12 22:49:14+00:00): HOla. Si está abandonada entonces no es amenity=fuel.
Y por favor no usar nombres descriptivos.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122234479
cserpell (2022-06-14 15:52:34+00:00): Estimado,

Gracias por agregar información al mapa. Por favor ten más cuidado de no agregar todos los elementos como edificio. En este caso (motel), y en el caso de un rancho en el sur de Quilpué estaban como edificios. Les saqué esa etiqueta.

Saludos,
WoodWoseWulf (2022-06-11 09:29:15+00:00): Okay,
So first you added a park over these houses and the road and added paths as if they passed between each building.
When that was reverted, you added another park with totally different dimensions and a completely different path layout to the first one.
Now you've added a parking lot in one changeset, and then deleted it and the original houses in another.
What are you actually trying to do? What source are you using? "General Improvements" is not a useful changeset comment.
samsmart (2022-06-11 05:08:48+00:00): تعمیر تلویزیون لبتاب
4b696d (2022-11-09 23:19:43+00:00): Well, no. Displaced thresholds are part of the runway. Blast pads are not.
Just measure the length of the runway and compare it to the official length. You will notice that the displaced threshold is included as it is part of the runway.
Jan Olieslagers (2022-11-10 08:28:40+00:00): They are part of the runway, yes indeed. Im my opinion, we should map the full length of runway as a runway, then add markings to it as appropriate for thresholds. A displaced threshold is, on the ground, nothing more than a stripe of paint, after all.
NB the matter has been discussed before, but I do not remember the outcome.
cserpell (2022-06-14 15:50:23+00:00): Estimado,

Un paradero, que ya estaba agregado, no es una estación de buses.
user_5359 (2022-06-13 16:03:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
jptolosa (2022-06-13 22:26:56+00:00): Hola, esa extensión de calle Padre Korda que añadiste actualmente se encuentra cerrada.
wireguy (2022-06-11 12:24:28+00:00): Baloo, multipolygon is not closed error on Bixby.  Tulsa is missing a role for one of the members.
Baloo Uriza (2022-06-12 06:00:52+00:00): Oof, OK, I'll try to track down what happened.  Super not a fan of Oklahoma's annexation rules that make for extraordinarily fiddly work.  I'm trying to get it cleaned up around my area since it's *baaad* and not something that most people can do without having some idea how boundaries here work and looking at the public data...