piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Owla (2017-06-09 15:04:12+00:00): Hey Toni,
danke für den Tipp! An office=accountant hab ich gar nicht gedacht...
Viele Grüße
Owla
Зелёный Кошак (2017-06-09 14:18:02+00:00): Это место физически существуют?
Зелёный Кошак (2017-06-09 14:17:24+00:00): Эти места физически существуют?
Зелёный Кошак (2017-06-09 14:17:06+00:00): Эти места физически существуют?
Zverik (2017-06-09 14:38:12+00:00): На сайте адресов нет, так что едва ли.
eggie (2020-05-12 06:07:08+00:00): Buitren onze grenzen begonnen met mappen en daarom nooit de wlekomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alsnog..Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
poornibadrinath (2017-06-16 12:31:12+00:00): Hi  EivindWAA_import,
  First of all, apologies that I didnt comment on your changeset before I made the repairs.  I have not done any major changes to the actual coastline but just changed the tags of the upper part to riverbank, because not having the coastline made it break on osm and make the river mandalseva appear as a thin line. This was the reason why this edit was changed. I agree the import mentioned may the coastline extended but not having that in a relation caused that entire zone to appear as land with a thin stream of river flowing. If any issues, please let me know. 
Thanks
Poornima Badrinath
mavl (2019-12-01 14:35:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
maraf24 (2017-06-17 20:33:04+00:00): Wycofałem.
Commodoortje (2017-06-09 21:00:42+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
Commodoortje (2017-06-09 21:35:21+00:00): Nav uw aanvulling vond ik het tijd om het industrieterrein te updaten met nieuwe panden en meer.
Hier kun je zien wat er gewijzigd is.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49408360
Commodoortje (2017-06-09 21:36:07+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49408318
maraf24 (2017-06-17 20:18:24+00:00): W OSM nie wolno kopiować z Google Maps.
maraf24 (2017-06-17 20:33:30+00:00): Wycofałem.
Marii Lange to nie tu.
user_3216889 (2017-06-09 22:17:15+00:00): Lijkt me goed zo.
Commodoortje (2017-06-09 20:55:34+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
freeExec (2017-06-09 12:39:48+00:00): Опять рисуете какую-то лажу. Убираю. 
Если там деревья, так их и рисуйте, а не парки. И делайте это аккуратно, а не тяп-ляп поперёк дома.
Alexander-II (2017-06-09 13:23:29+00:00): Покемонов наверно ждут.
utack (2017-06-09 14:22:49+00:00): Hello,  
as maps.me should have told you very clearly, you made a PUBLIC edit of the map.  
For personal information maps.me has bookmarks with notes, that can only be seen by you.  
Changes reverted
utack (2017-06-09 14:25:30+00:00): (that is, refering to the bus stop note, adding postal codes on buildings is of course welcome)
mavl (2019-12-01 14:32:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
literan (2017-06-09 12:37:59+00:00): Текст вывесок удаляешь :-(
Kostik (2017-06-09 17:21:13+00:00): Слышь умник, хочешь поговорить подъезжай в Москву. Хочешь разговора, есть форум. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=6129
Kostik (2017-06-09 17:22:59+00:00): мне нужно 5 минут чтоб за тобой прибраться.
Kostik (2017-06-09 17:23:40+00:00): я это могу делать хоть бесконечно, не надоест
literan (2017-06-10 13:33:27+00:00): Что-то я смотрю на вот эту улицу https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125387161/history#map=17/51.73189/58.79011 (и на иные рядовые именованные улицы в частном секторе), и понимаю, что неправ ни Kostik (с highway=service), ни Neribo Flong (кстати, не надо ругаться = это вас только приведет к блокировке). Согласно соглашению о статусах дорог https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification это highway=residential, т.е. посередине между вашими двумя версиями
Kostik (2017-06-10 19:13:57+00:00): Вот пакет правок где я именно residential ей статус и сделал. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49279198
Alecs01 (2020-01-15 18:20:16+00:00): Ciao, vedo che è una modifica vecchia, ma provo a chiedere lo stesso, che cos'è questo percorso che si sovrappone ad altre strade? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/763168788 se è un sentiero escursionistico o percorso per mtb si può creare una relazione.
albertolemiliano (2020-01-15 22:41:15+00:00): Si sovrappone perché qualcuno ieri ha sovrapposte un'altra traccia. Corretto il doppione
mavl (2019-12-01 14:35:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 77778038, 77780698, 77782051, 77779412, 77774430, 77776733 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted. Reason: an incompatible source].
aceman444 (2017-07-25 20:46:37+00:00): Hi, I've seen you have changed some highway=pedestrian areas into place=square. But that is not the same and place=square does not imply highway=pedestrian. So I have put some of the highway=pedestrian tags back.
miniwark (2017-08-24 15:06:15+00:00): Hi aceman, 

well... this areas are actually notable Squares in the city ! 
They are not just pedestrian areas.
See : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsquare

The Wiki says than squares include everything, including the pedestrian parts... 
- Garibaldi Place have many trees, a big fontain/sculpture, a road and the tramway.
- Massena place is also traversed by the tramway and a big street (felix Faure). There is also a big fontain/scultpure, and the small semi-circle street in the south are also part of it (same name).

Also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Plazas
Say than the square tag is a alternative for "plazzas"

I do not revert myself, but i find the square tag more relevant for this
big places than the semi-anonymous pedestrian+are tags.
aceman444 (2017-08-24 16:16:32+00:00): Hi, I totally agree with you and I have seen those wiki pages and understand the concept of place=square. I have left the place=square tags on the areas. I just say, that if you just changed highway=pedestrian into place=square you have lost the information the area is a pedestrian are an can be walked on by pedestrians and is also not visible to routing engines. So If you change to place=square and then micromap and split the area into more parts depending on if they are pedestrian areas or something else (a large fountain as you say), then that would be great and go on. But that wasn't done. I just saw that pedestrian areas got lost. So I think I put back the highway=pedestrian on some squares that really looked like (on bing) just a big pedestrian area. Thanks.
woodpeck_repair (2017-06-09 13:51:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 49043428, 49043630, 49043742, 49043770, 49043952, 49044003, 49045245, 49045276, 49045700, 49046094, 49046272, 49073339, 49073480, 49073900, 49105560, 49105871, 49106033, 49106358, 49106880, 49107181, 49107624, 49108027, 49112242, 49112547, 49163912, 49164670, 49164856, 49165555, 49165854, 49166747, 49167487, 49174267, 49175172, 49175245, 49186941, 49188076, 49188406, 49189369, 49304977, 49311417, 49311653, 49311832, 49316565, 49316886, 49380730.
nammala (2017-06-12 06:32:40+00:00): Hi CoastalGenius,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have added park tag removing wetland tag which is kind of vandalism. OSM is the real Map of the world and please add valid data. Let us know if you need anything regarding mapping.

Regards,
nammala
Firefishy (2017-06-09 15:01:56+00:00): Awesome! Thank you.
GerdP (2017-08-25 12:18:01+00:00): Moin!
Warum hast Du hier einen highway=cycleway auf passing_place geändert? Meintest Du path?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32759420
Was ist mit den hw=unclassified Wegen südlich? Sieht auch eher nach Radweg aus.
ma-rt-in (2017-08-25 13:44:39+00:00): tach,
habe path gemeint. Habs schon geändert.
Passiert mich manchmal wenn ich zu schnell tipp :)
Kostik (2017-06-09 17:17:31+00:00): А ничего что у вас все дороги имеют не правильный статус? Не смущает что есть которые придумали задолго до вас?
Kostik (2017-06-09 17:18:07+00:00): Не смущает что есть правила которые придумали задолго до вас?
literan (2017-06-10 13:01:43+00:00): что за zebra? Правильные теги для нерегулируемого перехода - crossing=uncontrolled
highway=crossing. Я здесь поправил.
scai (2017-06-11 12:10:44+00:00): Hallo Alec R,

bitte keinen Namen eintragen wenn kein echter Name existiert (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name).
Bitte auch keine Adresse für irgendwelche Gegenstände (wie Container) eintragen.
"Adolf Würth GmbH" sollte als operator eingetragen werden, nicht als Beschreibung.

Schaust du bitte mal drüber und korrigierst es? Ansonsten kann ich das auch tun :)

Grüße
Alex
Alec R (2017-06-15 14:43:26+00:00): Erledigt. Ich hoffe korrekt.
Alec R (2017-06-15 15:27:31+00:00): Jetzt steht nichts mehr bei den Containern in der normalen Kartenansicht. Wie findet denn der Standardbenutzer heraus welche Art von Container das ist?
scai (2017-06-15 15:41:56+00:00): Das ist eine sehr gute Frage :)

Nicht über den Namen, dafür sind die anderen Attribute (= "Tags") da. Man kann beispielsweise rechts auf das Fragezeichen und dann auf die Karte klicken. Dadurch werden alle Objekte in der Umgebung aufgelistet, die man dann einzeln analysieren kann. Das ist natürlich nicht sehr benutzerfreundlich.

Die Standardkarte ist nicht dafür da jedes kleine Detail anzuzeigen. Das würde nicht funktionieren da man viel zu viele Details eintragen aber nicht darstellen lassen kann. Stattdessen sind solche Dinge in den Auswertern zu lösen, also beispielsweise Navi-Apps auf dem Smartphone.
scai (2017-06-15 15:43:11+00:00): Und ja, sieht nun korrekt aus :)
Alec R (2017-06-15 16:53:33+00:00): Welche App zeigt denn Recyclingcontainer an?
Alec R (2017-06-15 16:56:21+00:00): Und wo wir schon bei "Überkorrektheit" sind ;): Wo kann ich beantragen, dass die Zeitangaben hier richtig dargestellt werden? "Vor weniger als eine Minute" ist doch falsch, oder? "Einer" müsste da stehen, meine ich.
scai (2017-06-16 06:54:58+00:00): Recyclingcontainer sollten die meisten Apps  anzeigen. OsmAnd listet beispielsweise auch die akzeptierten Abfälle an wenn man auf einen Container tippt.

Bezüglich der fehlerhaften Übersetzung: da ist wohl https://translatewiki.net/wiki/Translating:OpenStreetMap der richtige Anlaufpunkt. Frag mich aber nicht wo genau.
Hjart (2017-06-09 16:09:28+00:00): There's no such administrative division. The town is part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1784663 (the smallest administrative division her), so I have removed the boundary and created a polygon around the town instead:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499334997
osmviborg (2017-06-09 16:36:51+00:00): Nogen har foreslået det: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
Hjart (2017-06-09 16:48:07+00:00): Hvad mener du? Lystrup er jo ikke en administrativ enhed i sig selv (der er måske et lokalråd, men ingen borgmester eller noget decideret byråd). Den mindste officielle administrative grænse er kommunegrænsen.
osmviborg (2017-06-09 17:04:03+00:00): Skemaet taler for sig selv. Måske skulle man så fjerne DK.
Hjart (2017-06-09 17:23:51+00:00): Helt at fjerne DK lyder som en dårlig ide. Jeg redigerer lige tabellen.
ndm (2017-06-09 22:14:29+00:00): Not sure what adding a node with "hello" on it is for?
scai (2017-06-11 12:11:55+00:00): Hallo Alec R,

bei einem Getränkemarkt bitte shop=beverages setzen. "Getränkemarkt" ist sicherlich auch nicht der offizielle Name, oder doch?

Grüße
Alex
scai (2017-06-11 12:13:10+00:00): Öffnungszeiten lassen sich übrigens als opening_hours eintragen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours. Hier sollte man darauf achten dass die Syntax korrekt angegeben ist, einfach an den Beispielen orientieren.
Commodoortje (2017-06-20 18:11:20+00:00): Revert changeset due to vandalism.
Zie forumtopic 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=58795
zaizone (2017-06-09 22:14:15+00:00): Thank you for reverting that changeset !
ridixcr (2017-06-10 02:19:12+00:00): hi zaizone 👋!

We are to contribute for the well-being of our map 🌍

Have a nice day 👍
Polarbear (2017-06-12 22:45:55+00:00): Auch hier verschiebst du wieder grundlos Placenodes der Orte. Wir hatten schon mehrfach gebeten, das nicht zu tun.
Abkürzungen wie FFW wollen wir vermeiden.
Polarbear (2017-06-12 22:47:08+00:00): Den eingezeichneten Bahnhof https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4906177917 kann ich in Bing nicht entdecken. 
Im Vergleich von Bing zu Bavaria 80 cm zeigt sich eher großflächiger Abriss.
Polarbear (2017-06-12 22:49:48+00:00): Der Router der Deutschen Bahn schickt mich von Hbf Erlangen nach "Frauenaurach Bahnhof" mit dem Bus 281. Spricht auch nicht dafür, dass der Bahnhof noch existiert.
nhaesler (2017-06-27 16:19:30+00:00): Are you sure that path exists? Last time I've been there, it didn't. It seems extremely close to the railway. What's your source?
user_4944984 (2017-06-28 11:49:28+00:00): Hi, I just asked the person I got the gpx file from. You're right! The sorry to say - idiot - hopped on the train and let the gps on, without telling me about this segment. Sorry!! I deleted the path.
hihiro (2017-06-14 09:25:00+00:00): GPSと既存の道路等を加味して、「Japan GSI ortho imagery」のトレースで道路を追加、それに関連する道路の修正をしています。
ndm (2017-06-09 22:12:04+00:00): Hi, I think something isn't right with "The Pump Rooms and Stall Street -- they seem to have an odd shape now?
DaveF (2017-06-10 14:32:10+00:00): Hi Syvanne 
Welcome to OSM could you clarify what it is your trying to add? 
Most visible extents of the mediaeval wall are mapped. 
OSM is a database of current entities. If you wish to record historical data I recommend having a read of this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map
SNLA (2017-06-12 10:44:38+00:00): Hi DaveF,

Thank you for pointing this out to me. I have tried using OHM but the website seems down at the moment. Do you know anything about this?
DaveF (2017-06-12 11:12:51+00:00): Unsure of OHM's status, but OSM is not the place for razed entities. Please feel free to add any examples that still exist, adding appropriate tags. 
Could you also have a look at the problems NDM flagged up. Thanks.
SNLA (2017-06-13 10:03:51+00:00): Hi DaveF, I have clarified and I am able to use OSM for mapping my data as OHM is not yet compatible with other software which I need to use. I am working with the Pleiades Gazetteer, the Institute of Classical Studies and the Roman Society to create a map of Aquae Sulis using Archeological journals and existing maps. OSM has been used for similar ancient cities in other locations and there have been no issues raised. I will see to NDM's problems. Thanks.
DaveF (2017-06-13 13:17:44+00:00): Hi
Who did you discuss the addition of historical data to OSM with? Lack of features in other software is not a valid reason to add it to OSM. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features

I've had a brief read of Pleiades. I see no mention of contributing to OSM. It's a bit vague, but they appear to have their own database. Could you contribute to that?
ndm (2017-06-13 19:40:40+00:00): I think it probably needs to be raised on the talk-gb mailing list and maybe with the data working group -- they were great at removing edits in Bristol that added the historic HTV studio and icerink. It would be better to get some clarity -- rather than risk wasteing time on edits that could well be reverted.
SomeoneElse (2017-06-13 22:38:35+00:00): Hi - just for info - I've undone a node drag / node join that connected the end of the Cotswold Way to the corner of the Pump Rooms in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49514046 (based on the geometry change highlighted by http://osmhv.openstreetmap.de/changeset.jsp?id=49401905 ).
Best Regards,
Andy
ulmtuelp (2017-06-14 14:06:54+00:00): Das Waldstück Linie: 448950106  am Müllhaus (ist das Gebäude tatsächlich so benannt?) überkreuzt sich selber.
user_101460 (2017-06-09 16:25:23+00:00): Forest deleted change set
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46502407
hihiro (2017-06-14 09:24:40+00:00): GPSと既存の道路等を加味して、「Japan GSI ortho imagery」のトレースで道路を追加、それに関連する道路の修正をしています。
hihiro (2017-06-14 09:24:10+00:00): GPSと既存の道路等を加味して、「Japan GSI ortho imagery」のトレースで道路を追加、それに関連する道路の修正をしています。
Hjart (2017-06-09 18:00:05+00:00): Jeg har rettet dele af dette. Bemærk specielt at føtex er et supermarked og ikke et "department store"
Nmxosm (2019-01-14 14:45:27+00:00): Hallo Aas7uu,

In OpenStreetMap ist es üblich, die Telefonnummern in einem bestimmten Format anzugeben, damit Programme sie nutzen können: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone

Bitte beachte das bei weiteren Änderungen.
Außerdem freut es mich, wenn du es hier nachträgst, falls die Telefonnummer noch aktuell ist.

Vielen Dank und viele Grüße.
Nmxosm
Cyclomor90 (2017-06-12 19:18:55+00:00): Any Changes from the from the 8th on for June are meant to be in Al Ain, not Dubai.
Stereo (2017-06-09 17:43:13+00:00): You can actually add the ortho 2016 pictures in Go Map. PM me if you’re interested. Happy mapping!
oormilavinod (2017-06-12 04:49:20+00:00): hey jalejandravelez , welcome to OSM. i just observed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
keithonearth (2017-06-13 19:50:06+00:00): Thanks for these edits Alan! I added the first roads to Wood Lake Park just the other day, it's great to see so many details in the park now. :-)
Sanniu (2017-06-12 07:38:40+00:00): What do U trying to achieve with this change?
Kalaallit Nunaat (2017-06-10 16:26:42+00:00): Hello, change the source of the buildings when you modify their geometries.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-06-12 08:09:22+00:00): Też dzięki za aktualizacje!
trial (2021-07-01 11:06:05+00:00): Bonjour, extrait d'une discussion sur [OSM-talk-fr] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-fr/2021-July/thread.html

Sinon la route à petit trafic https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499364451, c'est une "residential" (sans maison !) (...).

Un unclassified serait plus logique (unclassified NE veut PAS dire non classifié au sens français (on ne sait pas) mais de niveau inférieur à tertiary. Et carrément service au nord (cul-de-sac).

Comme Christian là je mettrais pas lanes=2 car les voies ne sont pas matérialisées au sol.
valkebets (2017-06-10 10:26:49+00:00): But Rue de la Croix d'Or is not a pedestrian street: trams and buses use it!
Alecs01 (2017-06-10 10:58:06+00:00): All right, but you deleted it :) in OSM it is a pedestrian street since 2009 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5070227/history I have to conclude that local mappers are fine with that. psv=yes means exactly that it's open to public service vehicles, while tram lines run along their own parallel tracks.
valkebets (2017-06-10 18:06:33+00:00): So I should have changed it to psv instead of deleting it? I didn't check for how long it had been considered as a pedestrian street, but since I know public vehicles do use it, I thought it wasn't very safe to leave it like that.
Alecs01 (2017-06-10 19:25:06+00:00): It already has that tag, have a look, no need to change anything: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5070227 and no less than six routes through it, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1189812
nammala (2017-06-12 05:05:15+00:00): Hi Samo_

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). May I know the reason behind deleting the road . Did the road doesn't exist just wanted to confirm .

Regards,
nammala
Samo_ (2017-06-12 12:14:11+00:00): At the moment there are constructions, and the road is no longer available. I mean, it is there but not available to be used, and I'm notsure if it will be open again, it's been closed for quite some time now.
nammala (2017-06-12 12:17:57+00:00): Thanks samo_ for the prompt response
Commodoortje (2017-06-09 20:52:20+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
user_3216889 (2017-06-09 22:13:59+00:00): source=BAG graag laten staan; slaat op import van gebouw uit officiële gegevens.
Openingstijden moeten wat aangepast worden; zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours.
DuncanvR (2017-06-09 22:27:09+00:00): `source=BAG` teruggezet; openingstijden zijn eigenlijk helemaal niet zo spannend, zijn altijd via de website op te zoeken; dus die heb ik weer verwijderd. Thanks!
VA00 (2017-06-25 14:52:08+00:00): Trochę mylące tagowanie remontu. Fakt, piesi i rowerzyści tam się poruszają, ale znaki na to nie zezwalają.
ZeroJeden (2017-06-25 19:24:26+00:00): Tak, ale w tym wypadku ze względów praktycznych tak oznaczyłem. Bez tego połączenia przedostanie się tych kilkuset metrów wymaga wyznaczania trasy około 15 km.
user_5359 (2017-06-10 16:14:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Are you really a hospital or a bigger dental centre (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dhospital or  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddentist)? For better description of your work please read also the page following the link Healthcare 2.0
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-06-16 12:03:31+00:00): Bom dia Dhyonne Pessoa, você criou uma via em cima da outra: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/499161494/history e tbm desenhou áreas colando nas vias, está errado.como aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498435986/history amanhã eu vou descolar e deletar essa via Rua São Francisco
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-06-16 12:06:43+00:00): Pronto eu descolei as areas das vias e tbm desconectei a via Rua São Franciso que você desenhou por cima da PR 317
DuncanvR (2017-06-09 21:15:40+00:00): Deze lijst met wijzigingen is wat groot, omdat ik niet door had dat het in de online editor (iD) niet mogelijk was slechts een deel van de aanpassingen op te slaan.
Commodoortje (2017-06-09 21:44:00+00:00): Alles wat je in ID aanraakt wordt aangemerkt als wijziging. Wees daarom voorzichtig met aanklikken en oppakken van nodes/ways.
De opslaan button maakt een changeset van de reeds gemuteerde objecten.
Je zou kunnen overwegen om over te stappen op JOSM.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
utack (2017-06-09 22:16:26+00:00): Hi, du hast einen typo im "craft" key
chan (2017-06-09 22:24:14+00:00): behoben
Kalaallit Nunaat (2017-06-10 16:17:33+00:00): Hello, it would be better if you use the tag access=private when it is the case.
kreuzschnabel (2018-12-18 20:44:03+00:00): zu Relation 7323088: Wenden in Einbahnstraßen muss wirklich nicht explizit verboten werden, auf die Idee kommt kein Router. Ich nehm die mal raus.
DuncanvR (2017-06-09 23:11:39+00:00): Bij review, zie ook #49409870
kreuzschnabel (2017-11-26 16:17:15+00:00): Thanks for adding some features to Patterdale area. Just keep in mind that any gate on a public footpath needs a foot=yes tag, otherwise routers will consider the gate to be locked even for pedestrians :)
user_3216889 (2017-06-09 22:09:02+00:00): Highway=pedestrian wordt enkel gebruikt bij voetgangerszones bij (winkel)centra. Meestal staat er dan ook een bord G07zb.
Anders gewoon highway=footway gebruiken.
Probeer bij een parkeerterrein een weg te maken die over het terrein heengaat (niet vastmaken aan contour van parkeerterrein zelf), die auto's kunnen volgen om te parkeren; deze dan markeren met highway=service en service=parking_aisle.
DuncanvR (2017-06-09 22:48:14+00:00): Thanks voor de review!
Parkeerterrein aangepast; wat het voetpad betreft heb ik hetzelfde type gebruikt als de omliggende paden (Leeuwenhofje, Geniepad, etc). Wil 'm best aanpassen hoor -- maar dan wijkt het juist af van de rest. :)
user_3216889 (2017-06-09 22:53:22+00:00): Helaas heeft iemand anders daar eerder ook ten onrechte 'pedestrian' gebruikt. Mag gecorrigeerd worden.
DuncanvR (2017-06-09 23:20:34+00:00): Check: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49409934

Van de andere paden (die aansluiten op het Kazerneplein zelf) weet ik niet zeker of er geen bord staat; dat zou ik moeten checken.
DuncanvR (2017-06-09 23:21:30+00:00): Oh -- met 'check' bedoelde ik 'vink' of 'gedaan', niet 'controleer dit'. Cheers!