piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
frasty (2015-01-07 02:46:57+00:00): spero di non essere stato troppo pedante e se credi sia il caso può andare anche 1 come mtb:scale, 2 però è obiettivamente troppo soprattutto considerando il contesto..  sarebbe da mettere alle votazioni se partecipasse qualcun'altro ;)
surftrader (2015-01-07 16:16:52+00:00): Figurati,su OSM si mappa sentieri che si conoscono già,ovvero lo si fa per gl'altri e quindi apprezzo qualunque puntualizzazione costruttiva e le tue lo sono.
Ho dato un'occhiati ad altri sentieri della zona che ho fatto ed effettivamente sono quasi tutti scala 1.Detto francamente usando scala 1 per sentieri come il rockoh cosi' come per sasserelli fa si che quella scala non abbia quasi senso.Ed effettivamente i cavalli in proporzione dovrebbe essere 0 .Per come la vedo io darei a cavalli 1,a sasserelli e 301 darei 2,e al rock-oh o tre dita almeno 3 (ma questi nn li ho fatti quindi parlo per sentito dire).E' anche vero che leggendo le diciture di ciascun livello ti portano a livellare verso il basso....capita che ci sono sentieri con le stesse caratteristiche a livello di fondo e tornanti ma con difficoltà molto differenti.Concludento o si riconsiderano anche gli altri o altrimenti cavalli è effettivamente da 0.Ci pensi tu a rimetterlo a 0?Ripristina pure anche le altre modifiche (non sapevo che in altre mappe mostrasse anche il ref. E' un peccato non lo faccia anche OSM).Grazie.Ciao
frasty (2015-01-08 11:46:56+00:00): Ho rifatto quel sentiero: alla fine si, probabilmente è più indicato mtb:scale1. Ho impostato la prima parte a 1, mediamente un po' più difficile da affrontare, fino all'intersezione con M&M e il resto a 0+, specificando vari punti con un valore maggiore (non tutti i tornanti naturalmente, soltanto due punti più ostici). Sono d'accordo sul valore per gli altri sentieri, anche per il 3dita probabilemente è più indicato 3, il rock-oh invece non ricordo di averlo fatto.
Per ora direi di rimanere così senza discostarsi troppo dalle indicazioni del wiki (dove in effetti stanno abbastanza bassi)..
Ciao!
mavl (2014-12-25 18:20:13+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Почему вы не пишете комментарии к пакетам правок, особенно когда удаляете какие-либо объекты?
Aleksandar Matejevic (2024-10-07 09:35:28+00:00): Hi Kilkenni, are you sure that name for suburb node 3252578372 is "Химчистка"
mariotomo (2021-11-15 18:09:38+00:00): oops: I added all the trees in the Viento Solar collection, and not only didn't I ever complete the genus/species work, I also forgot to add the 'natural=tree' tag!
trigpoint (2014-12-25 21:30:21+00:00): It is normal to tag a hotel as tourism=hotel
Illio (2021-08-17 21:36:31+00:00): Odkiaľ prosím pochádza názov kostola v Rožňave "Studentský kostol", navyše s pravopisnou chybou?
Illio (2021-08-17 21:37:30+00:00): A prečo pri väčšine kostolov nie je uvedený celý názov, teda "Kostol XY", ale iba "XY"?
*Martin* (2021-08-18 06:12:24+00:00): Ahoj. Nazvy boli prebrate z katastra (kde boli/su chyby bezne).

Ci slovicko "kostol" patri do nazvu je mozno vhodne prebrat na osm_sk@googlegroups.com. Ja sa snazim vseobecne nazvy (ako kostol, obecnu urad, skola, pramen, a pod.) do nazvu nedavat, kedze su vyjadrene inymi tagmi. Tak ako napr. povedzme ani mesta nemaju v nazve slovo mesto (napr. davame "Nitra" namiesto "Mesto Nitra"), alebo aj pri uliciach...
Illio (2021-08-18 10:50:43+00:00): V prípade napr. Nitry je "Nitra" úplný názov toho mesta. Ale ak niečo má v názve iba "sv. Anny", tak to môže byť kostol, kaplnka, katedrála, chrám (v prípade gréckokatolíckych a pravoslávnych) a možno ešte aj niečo inšie. Navyše, slovo "kostol", "kaplnka" a pod. je súčasťou celého názvu.
*Martin* (2021-08-18 11:25:59+00:00): Aký je v tom rozdiel? Nitra môže byť aj rieka, prameň, a pod. Či je to kostol alebo kaplnka povie building=church alebo building=chapel.
kayle (2021-08-18 11:32:41+00:00): "...môže byť kostol, kaplnka, katedrála, chrám..."
Preto sú tu aj iné značky, ktoré to pre daný objekt upresnia a netreba sa spoliehať na slovíčka v názve.  Navyše ak má byť mapa pre viac krajín, je to jednotné a netreba riešiť či je alebo nie je niečo v názve, prípadne to prekladať.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
Illio (2021-08-18 11:49:03+00:00): Značka to síce povie, avšak:
1. 99 % ľudí si nebude pozerať značky a preto je dobré, ak je to uvedené aj v názve
2. ako som už uviedol, je to súčasť názvu danej budovy, preto to má byť v tagu "name"

Pokiaľ je súčasťou názvu mesta aj slovo "mesto", tak sa samozrejme uvedie (napr. Nové Mesto nad Váhom či v Česku napr. Město Albrechtice).
*Martin* (2021-08-18 12:36:28+00:00): 1. to je problem renderera a ak to Carto styl na OSM nevie, moze to vediet nejaky iny - pridat text "kostol", v anglickej verzii prida text "church" v nemeckej "kirche" a pod. No a jedno z pravidiel OSM je ze sa nemapuje pre renderer.

2. ak je to z jazykovedneho hladiska naozaj sucast nazvu, potom suhlasim. Ale stale odporucam prebrat to na osm_sk@googlegroups.com, nech je spolocny konsenzus, aby to kazdy nerobil po svojom. Mozno pomozu aj nejake pravidla SJ ak sa tomu venuju, pripadne ine "dokazy", ze je to fakt cele vlastne meno kostola. Mozno nejake zapisy v katastri, nejakom ofic. registri, alebo co ja viem :-)
species (2014-12-26 21:07:09+00:00): Hi,
die Stiegenabschnitte kannst du ruhig mit highway=steps taggen :-)
lg
ebrelsford (2015-04-13 19:27:32+00:00): Hey Korzun, I think this relation is super useful so thanks for including it!

There's a small issue I just ran into trying to use OSM to get me to 200 Willoughby Ave, which is Myrtle Hall--since the relation has 200 Willoughby Ave as its address I ended up in the middle of campus and very confused!

I understand why we might want the address there, but I wonder if there's a way to keep routing / geocoding working with the address there? Any thoughts?

eric
zarl (2015-01-16 11:28:47+00:00): Hi!
in diesem Changeset hast du einen Pfad (mit Hinweisschildern) eingetragen, der quer durch Autobahnauffahrt und Bundesstrasse sowie (lt. Bing) durch Häuser verläuft, und dann an keiner Stelle an andere Wege anschliesst: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318889420
Da du vermutlich nicht Lausbubenstreiche vorhattest, ist das ein copy/paste-Versehen? In dem Changeset sind ja noch etliche andere Änderungen enthalten, sollte man die auch nochmal prüfen?
Gruss,
Zarl
agsochi (2014-12-27 08:49:29+00:00): Чего там с путями случилось?
agsochi (2014-12-27 09:03:07+00:00): http://privetsochi.ru/blog/news_sochi/51001.html
У нас тут народ пишет что поезд ходит - но редко.
agsochi (2014-12-27 09:17:02+00:00): Там просто не аэроэкспресс, а простая электричка ходит
hamzaalloush (2014-12-26 04:19:01+00:00): added couple of houses, a supermarket, a convinience store
valgard (2014-12-26 05:02:26+00:00): Gibt es ein extra Icon dafür?
esplanade00 (2014-12-26 05:22:01+00:00): One thing I forgot to put in: That so called russell drive doesn't seem to exist. No trace on satellite or the like, and it seems like the road was ripped from google maps. You can restore the road if I'm wrong, and it's just very new.
zool (2014-12-26 05:29:28+00:00): i'm not sure this changeset is an improvement, zuppet. would you care to explain it?
Hjart (2014-12-26 10:36:52+00:00): Jeg har forbundet de 2 nye veje korrekt. Er det fordi du ikke ved hvordan eller fordi du har for travlt at du ikke får det gjort?
Storebonden (2014-12-26 16:17:49+00:00): Et eller andet må jeg gøre forkert, men lige hvad jeg jeg ikke lige med på, kan du forklar lige hvad jeg ikke gør
Hjart (2014-12-29 23:40:07+00:00): Det ville være nemt at forklare hvis jeg stod ved siden af dig og kunne pege på din skærm (jeg drømmer iøvrigt om at lave kurser i grundlæggende OpenStreetMap). Men en god forklaring kan du finde under punkt 5 i http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3.1. Håber det er nok til at du kan finde ud af det. Hvis du ikke er en ørn til engelsk, kan jeg oversætte teksten for dig.
Rockus (2015-09-09 10:23:23+00:00): Hallo Maper,

in diesem und mehreren weiteren Änderungssätzen trägst Du Rettungspunkte auf sächsischem Forstgebiet ein. Aus welcher Quelle stammen die Daten dazu oder sind die Rettungspunkte selbst erfasst?
Im Jahr 2014 gab es bereits eine Anfrage zur Datenübernahme an den Staatsbetrieb Sachsenforst, die klar ablehnend beantwortet wurde. Siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Permissions dazu.
Petja (2014-12-26 10:35:59+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Наименование_автодорог
Filip009CZ (2026-02-13 19:16:16+00:00): Ahoj, prečo ECAV? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85610843
zool (2015-02-11 05:53:01+00:00): hello zuppet
Petja (2014-12-26 10:34:01+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Наименование_автодорог
KristenK (2015-01-08 01:22:22+00:00): Hello,

This changeset affected the relation that represents the boundary of Denver International Airport (DEN). Since this changeset was committed, the boundaries for DEN *do not* render in OSM and because the relation is no longer a valid multi-polygon.

It isn't clear why the deletions were made. Before reverting the changeset, I am writing to ask you to you shed some light on these activities. I would prefer working with you to re-construct the DEN boundary relation via changeset reversion.

Thanks.

Best,

Kristen
chachafish (2015-01-08 06:20:38+00:00): Hey, Thanks for contacting me. That deletion was done completely by mistake. I accidentally hit "save" and didn't know how to repair the error. Sorry about that :)
KristenK (2015-01-08 17:42:15+00:00): Thanks for responding. I'll go ahead and revert this changeset.

If you have any questions about editing feel free to contact me or post in the OSM Talk US  mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us)

Best,

Kristen
Skippern (2014-12-26 11:49:54+00:00): Se tem serviço de barca/balsa de passageiros ou carros no este ponto, usa amenity=ferry_terminal, o leisure=slipway significando um lugar onde voce pode coloque um barco no agua ou retira-lo.
Hjart (2014-12-26 13:04:01+00:00): Provstemarken lyder som et nyt villakvarter?
Camille Iwanoff Mortensen (2014-12-26 22:37:23+00:00): Nope... Kan godt se det er en oplagt tanke... men det er ikke tilfældet :-)
Arealet hedder Provstemarken og så vidt jeg husker er der en tinglysning el.lign. på at arealet til stadighed skal drives som mark (har ikke et udbytte der har værdi landbrugsmæssigt). Der ligger resterne af en gammel klosterruin midt på arealet.
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-12-26 11:48:55+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Baloo Uriza (2014-12-27 01:40:23+00:00): Thanks for this fixup.  Would be nice if Metro would give some proper route numbers to the member routes in this network and call the walking part different from the biking part so they can be logically mapped.  I may be asking for too much out of the ground truth, realistically...
bergfruehling (2014-12-26 19:07:06+00:00): Fusswege eingezeichnet
malenki (2015-01-10 18:04:26+00:00): Heißen https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318921404 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318921405 wirklich "Zugangsweg"?

Noch ein paar Tipps: Fußwege sind implizit nicht für Autos zugelassen, das muss man nicht auch noch explizit (motor_vehicle=no) dranschreiben.

Generell gilt: keine Abkürzungen verwenden, wo der vollständige Name bekannt ist: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#Abk.C3.BCrzungen_.28nicht_verwenden.21.29
Sam Lown (2015-05-06 11:33:15+00:00): It appears there was a bug with this changeset that broke navigation via the Calle de Alcalá over the M30. Please be careful with prohibiting turns!
Canellone (2015-05-06 11:53:08+00:00): Hi Sam, you´re right. Sorry about that, it was when I was learning about prohibiting turns and it was a mistake that I made.
Now I´am really careful.
Thanks for comment.
Sam Lown (2015-05-06 15:07:39+00:00): No worries, thanks for honesty!
GerdP (2015-10-24 17:58:10+00:00): please review way 318948681:
what does the tag highway=desire_path mean?
Akrimullah IRM-RV (2020-07-09 04:29:34+00:00): Hi, the way around this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318957815 that you've added 5 years ago seems need to be updated into the proper tags. So by informing you in this message, I also have change the tag into residential. please have a look. thank you.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-18 14:09:01+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/318965726 really spelt like that?
StreloG (2014-12-26 18:48:58+00:00): при "тренировках" не нужно заливать данные в базу
Skippern (2014-12-26 19:41:36+00:00): Estradas da terra sem nome deve ser mapeado como noname=yes e surface=unpaved (ou outro valor identificando o supreficia. name="Estrada de Terra" não deve ser usado se não existem placas com este nome.
mmorgado (2014-12-26 19:54:34+00:00): Corrigido,obrigado
XimeX (2015-04-09 10:43:56+00:00): Warum hast du die Waldflächen die durch die L4020 getrennt sind wieder verbunden?
KristenK (2015-01-08 01:22:37+00:00): Hello,

This changeset affected the relation that represents the boundary of Denver International Airport (DEN). Since this changeset was committed, the boundaries for DEN *do not* render in OSM and because the relation is no longer a valid multi-polygon.

It isn't clear why the deletions were made. Before reverting the changeset, I am writing to ask you to you shed some light on these activities. I would prefer working with you to re-construct the DEN boundary relation via changeset reversion.

Thanks.

Best,

Kristen
KristenK (2015-01-08 17:35:36+00:00): I suspect this changeset was commited (deleted OSM way) was made on accident like this one. 

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27705328

I'll go ahead and revert it for you. Thanks again for responding to my other changeset comment!

Kristen
SomeoneElse (2015-01-04 10:46:24+00:00): I'm not convinced that the farmland to the west of the ridge such as  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319041308 is really "meadow".  When I was last there it just looked like part of the rest of the local farmland (some arable, some with animals on it).
SomeoneElse (2015-01-09 23:57:57+00:00): You also added http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3254515663 as a duplicate of an existing church.  I deleted it.
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-12-26 23:58:42+00:00): Jeśli chodzi o adresy w gminie Ogrodzieniec, to trochę nie ma sensu dodawać ich ręcznie, ponieważ niedługo powinno zostać ukończone wdrożenie EMUiA w tej gminie - http://ogrodzieniec.e-mapa.net/. Wtedy dokonany zostanie import całości punktów adresowych do OSM.
tuxayo (2014-12-26 18:41:23+00:00): Errata: La source aurait du être "survey 2014-09"
tuxayo (2014-12-26 19:24:05+00:00): Errata: Ajout EFS
(touche entré appuyé par erreur...)
woodpeck (2014-12-27 17:06:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted. Please respect http://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Working_Group_Minutes/DWG_2014-06-05_Special_Crimea
Lachgast (2025-07-30 23:05:40+00:00): Hoi Hendrikklaas,

Ik zat even naar de gebouwen aan de Teakhout te kijken. Het viel me op dat de ingangen van de parkeergarage onder het gebouw volgens onze kaart nu over de berm heen gaan. Weet je zeker dat er aan de kant van de Houtveldweg toegangen zijn (voor auto's) tot de parkeergarage?

Het is alweer een decennium geleden, maar goed. ;)
groet!
Rockus (2014-12-26 20:47:30+00:00): Reason for revert: user anbr occasionally edits wider areas always with comment "improves accuracy". He never has any local knowlede on most places and also adds many fantasy ways. These ones in this area here were already revertet. This revert only includes moved nodes and nonsensical changed tags on ways. He is never aware of aerial displacement and so moves "everything he could catch" on wrong positions (in this case all a few meters in the same direction, even though many GPS traces would show it different). I call this "vandalism", not "improves accuracy".
BearT (2014-12-28 15:28:32+00:00): Hallo Karl, 
in Openstreetmap gibt es die Regel dass nur Namen vergeben werden, wenn es auch Namen gibt. Zäune haben sowas normalerweise nicht. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
Wenn du willst, dass bestimmte Beschriftungen auftauchen, dann musst du dir eine eigene Karte rendern, aber Namen eintragen weil du sie gern sehen würdest ist für OSM nicht vorgesehen.

Ich würde dich bitten das in Zukunft zu beachten und diese beschreibenden Namen wieder zu entfernen.

Vielen Dank,
BearT

PS: Die Diskussion findest du unter https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/291867
fernanlob (2014-12-26 23:55:12+00:00): Tambien se elimina una prueba realizada por alguien que no borró, ponía "prueva" y era una ruta de bicicleta
skquinn (2014-12-27 00:10:36+00:00): Oops. Tree rows, plural.
JBacc1 (2015-01-22 17:16:38+00:00): Salut Nicolas,
Je vois source=survey pour le nom de la Rue des Jardins. Bano avec Chemin des Jardins, c'est pas bon, alors ? Je rajoute le ref:FR:FANTOIR ? J'ai ajouté les 3 autres rues manquantes.
Ptigrouick (2015-01-23 10:46:04+00:00): Salut JB,
Vérification faite sur ma photo terrain c'est bien Chemin des Jardins. Merci pour la correction ! ;-)
Peter Dobratz (2014-12-30 16:21:31+00:00): Please add a comment to your changesets when you are uploading changes to the map.
4rch (2015-01-19 15:14:44+00:00): This changeset damaged some administrative boundaries. Please do not delete river ways. River ways are necessary for rendering + routing + boundaries. I've repaired the damaged boundaries already.
Supaplex (2014-12-27 06:53:32+00:00): These two Fujian Provinces are controlled by Taiwan and China separately. So there's not a duplicated. 
And the Jinman and Matsu Island is controlled by Taiwan, not China.
pnorman (2014-12-27 07:22:13+00:00): Both claimed or both controlled?
katpatuka (2014-12-27 07:37:33+00:00): I was not able to revert the changeset using josm's revert plugin.
BTW: English wiki says for Fujian: For the part of Fujian province administered by the Republic of China, see Fukien Province.
@Supaplex Do you mean that Fujian?
Supaplex (2014-12-27 09:48:46+00:00): The Taiwan control part
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujian_Province,_Republic_of_China?oldformat=true

The China control part
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fujian?oldformat=true
Supaplex (2014-12-27 10:22:03+00:00): I revert the changeset
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27726635#map=8/25.013/119.465
katpatuka (2014-12-27 10:29:10+00:00): ok, nice :D
but please add a note with the content of your initial changeset comment so that it is clear that there are two Fujian relations. To make it even clearer one could name the Taiwan part Fukien Province.
SomeoneElse (2015-01-01 13:18:15+00:00): The changeset comment here says "typing error corrected", but what was the typing error that was corrected?
n76 (2016-08-23 23:06:42+00:00): After all this time I need to create new paper maps of this area and I find that the outer ways of the natural=wood polygon (relation 3291187) are gone.

Was there a problem with that polygon?

For my immediate needs I guess I could render forest green based on the Los Padres boundary but I'd rather do it based on land cover.
nmixter (2016-08-24 16:05:15+00:00): Not sure exactly which relation you were referring to. There were a couple here that were too large covering area that was not all wood. If you want to try to restore that relation feel free. Adding would on the boundary could work as a temorary solution. I think it is the issue that has some pretty good Landover files. Maybe you can use these to help with rendering. The default carrot rendering has also changed recently so areas that rendered as green no longer show up.
n76 (2016-08-24 16:28:18+00:00): As noted above, it was relation 3291187 http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3291187/history That relation and the ways in it were manually entered based on Bing imagery.

With respect to rendering, I am using my own scripts and Mapnik to generate properly scaled maps for nordic skiing, so I don't need to alter either the forest or Chumash wilderness boundaries in OSM to get green to show, only change my XML style files to indicate that is how I want it rendered.

All that said, it would be nice to have better landcover in OSM and creating it from Bing imagery has issues (hard to tell scrub from trees, slow and tedious to do, etc.). So I would not be adverse to an import if you know of a good source with appropriate licensing. What land cover data do you know about?
4rch (2015-01-20 00:03:39+00:00): Hi, I've noticed that you've deleted the boundary ways of the Hibiscus Coast. Is this boundary obsolete? If yes, than the following relation and way should be deleted: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2104478
tyr_asd (2014-12-27 14:34:32+00:00): Hi! I see that you list google maps and tobacco as sources for this changeset. Please note that using these commerial copyrighted maps are not allowed to be used as sources for OpenStreetMap! (See the following wiki page for more information: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#2a._Can_I_trace_data_from_Google_Maps.2FNokia_Maps.2F....3F)

Please consider re-verifying your additions using any free, open data material, wikipedia or old/out-of-copyright maps. (The following page has a list of potential data sources: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Potential_Datasources)
woodpeck (2015-01-03 16:00:40+00:00): DWG has been contacted about the automated edits by Test360 and is reverting them. Thank you for dealing with the situation in your area already - but next time it would be great if you used the changeset discussion feature to actually express your criticism in the changeset that causes the problem rather than in your changeset comment! That way the message is sure to reach the person who made the changes.
BeKri (2016-03-18 22:30:08+00:00): Tach,
Versuch erfolgreich ?
Beendet ?
Wird gelöscht ? ;-)
Was wolltest Du da versuchen ? (Neugierig)
Rogehm (2016-03-19 16:01:58+00:00): Um deine Neugier zu befriedigen, ist ja schon was her. Hier hatte ich mal kurz eine 110 kV Stromfreileitung getestet, die Existenz hat auf der Südbrücke Köln. (mit besonderen Aufhängeverfahren /  power=portal).
lezurdis (2014-12-29 13:29:42+00:00): Olá,

Como és recém inscrito queria deixar-te alguns comentários, quando somos novos nisso podemos não saber como fazer as alterações.

Por exemplo aqui :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/299154081

Fizeste muito bem colocar um semáforo (highway=traffic_signals) más é um semáforo que faz também cabeleireiro (shop=hairdresser) ???
Obviamente um cabeleireiro não pode estar no meio da rua.

Também colocaste pontos sem qualquer identificação :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3255086226
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3255090037

Se calhar querias indicar que há uma escola ou uma estação de comboio nestes sitios, o que não é preciso porque a escola e a estação já la estão.

Também vi uns desenho de estrada muito estranho :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182877387
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27293539
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182877400
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/319092203

O pior foi que tiraste em varias estradas que estavam bem o oneway=yes que indica que a estrada só tem um sentido, exemplo :
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11557576/history
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/95290510/history
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/11557575/history
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27293523/history
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27256648/history
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27256653/history
- http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27256658/history

Com a tua alteração estas estradas passam a ser de sentido duplo, o que obviamente não é o caso aqui.

Por isso, pede-te se queres verificar e corrigir um a um todos os objetos deste changeset ?
Pessoalmente penso que não vale a pena verificar um a um os objetos, é pena mas o melhor é fazer um revert total deste changeset.

Se concordares, farei o revert deste changeset. Espero a tua resposta.

Boa continuação
lezurdis (2015-01-04 22:51:40+00:00): Nenhuma resposta, revert completo do changeset.
Macy72 (2014-12-27 12:34:35+00:00): Javítás Damjanich helyett a Pozsonyi a jó
JohnDoe23 (2014-12-27 16:51:45+00:00): access=no besagt, dass in diesem Weiher niemand schwimmen darf. Vermutlich ist das falsch, da der Weiher mit "Badeweiher" betitelt wurde. Die Eintragung als Swimming-Pool halte ich für suboptimal, ich würde zu natural=water + sport=swimming tendieren.