piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ashs_as (2022-10-30 09:51:47+00:00): Hello a007113h;
I noticed you add "highway=motorway_junction" and it didn't match the rules to add these tags in this case could you fix it, please?
For more information on how to use "motorwat_jucntion"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway_junction
Regards
ashs_as
Claudio Persegani (2023-09-04 13:18:00+00:00): Buongiorno,
Ho percorso il Sintér dai Clémp sabato pomeriggio per rientrare al rifugio Nambrone da un giro ad anello. Sono arrivato sano e salvo alla strada anche grazie alla precisione della tracciatura, che mi ha guidato fino alla strada sottostante. Considerata la selvaticità del sentiero, pensavo che sarebbe meglio segnalare in qualche modo il fatto che la sua agibilità sia piuttosto ridotta. Qualcuno ha informazioni sulle origini di questa traccia? È utilizzata dai mandriani? Grazie
iweniweniwen (2023-09-04 19:25:57+00:00): Buonasera Claudio,
La traccia è di rado frequentata - specie a confronto con gli altri sentieri più ad est in zona Ritort - ciononostante è un sentiero storico che collega la località di Clemp alla Mandra dal Fo. Oggi è utilizzato da escursionisti e cacciatori, mentre l'area non è più monticata da diversi anni.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-29 20:19:57+00:00): This change is obviously incorrect and has been reverted. Porterville Developmental Center is not a park.
eggie (2022-10-29 06:13:12+00:00): Dag SW ...
Scherp gezien..  

Lijkt me nu weer oke zo.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-29 06:16:36+00:00): .. Ik heb wel een stukje Kemerij dat op Vaanholt stond gecorrigeerd. Bij nr 30.

MVG
eggie
Luzandro (2022-12-16 11:38:43+00:00): Hallo,

siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3478433
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128190845
Glassman (2022-11-01 22:49:52+00:00): Question - you added a number of gates to the driveway. Are they actually on the long driveway or the unmapped driveways going to houses along the way? Could you look edit over? Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128191038
LoneFir (2022-11-01 23:18:24+00:00): These gates are across the driveway/service road for the waterline. All related driveways are mapped.

Some gates are locked and only accessible to the water company. My intent was to add context on this road to show that isn't accessible in some areas.

Let me know if there is a better way to do this or if it isn't worth adding.
Glassman (2022-11-02 02:47:35+00:00): What I found odd was there are 5 gates on the service road. The one connecting to 171st Avenue SE makes sense as does the one just west of 165th Drive SE. 

If they are physically blocking use of the service road then they are mapped correctly. I just haven't seen this many before. 

It definitely is worth mapping. For example, if I'm visiting a friend that lives off the service road, I need to make sure I can get through the gate. Plus OSM may have better map for emergency services. Knowing that there are gates is important. Check out this talk from a long time firefighter from Colorado. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qgk9al1rluE
SomeoneElse (2022-10-29 11:34:02+00:00): Hello,
Are you perhaps performing edits on behalf of Expedia?  If so, in line with https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines ("A user’s profile page should also include links to the wiki pages of the organised edits and organisations they participate in on an ongoing basis."), could you please update you profile?
Best Regards.
Andy Townsend (from OSM's Data Working Group)
WoodWoseWulf (2022-10-29 19:45:23+00:00): Hi,

I'm not sure leisure=park is the best tag to be used on an area like this.

Maybe historic=district instead?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Ddistrict
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-29 07:13:08+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Glassman (2022-11-01 22:51:06+00:00): #TIP: We don't use abbreviations in street names. The reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you expand the street names?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128191403
Tatfahren (2022-11-05 17:59:23+00:00): Du hattest vergessen eine Beschreibende Eigenschaft neben "name=" einzutragen, ich hab das jetzt entsprechend ergänzt.
pitfire (2022-10-29 05:47:22+00:00): Hallo Michael3001,
willkommen bei OSM. 

Nach meiner Meinung ist das Gebäude nicht "building=industrial", sondern "DE:Tag:office=company".
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office%3Dcompany

Name ist nur "Reifenhäuser"
Beim Namen bitte keine Gesellschaftform mit reinschreiben sondern nur den eigentlichen Namen. Gesellschaftformen unter operator=

(Reifenhäuser GmbH & Co. KG Maschinenfabrik) ist "DE:Key:operator"
Betreiber (z. B. Unternehmen, Privatperson, öffentliche Körperschaft) des Objekts.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-29 17:54:03+00:00): Is it intentional that you deleted some roads around https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/43.77794/11.25900 that appear on aerial imagery?

What is your source for that edit?

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128192041
hypersciocco (2022-11-02 13:43:37+00:00): I deleted some roads in Piazza San Marco that are closed because of construction of the new tram. According to construction plans, they will not to be opened again, as the square will be redesigned.
Final square project:
https://mobilita.comune.fi.it/tramvia/sistema_tramviario/sistema.html
Construction schedule:
https://www.firenzetramvia.it/cantieri
hypersciocco (2022-11-02 13:48:38+00:00): Obviously the square has to be updated as construction goes on.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-08 16:33:27+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107850974/history has paved = yes that was added in this edit
Why not surface=paved ? What is benefit of using unusual paved=yes rather than surface=paved ?
MxxCon (2022-10-31 04:03:54+00:00): Hello.
Based on the satellite imagery it doesn't look like there's shoulder on the right here. Could you please elaborate on this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128192488
surveyor54 (2022-10-28 22:01:43+00:00): Revert und den aktuellen Zustand wieder hergestellt. Der neue Parkplatz kann erst eingezeichnet werden, wenn ein aktuelles Luftbild vorliegt.
Source: aktuelles Luftbild Hessen DOP20
syntex (2023-03-08 13:59:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107858240
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107858241
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107858248
W ogóle patrzysz co dodajesz? te budynki nie istnieją
syntex (2023-03-08 14:46:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107860481
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107860482
www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107859694
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107859871
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107860618
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107860583
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107860575
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107860599
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107860831
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107860832
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107860070
abakus_uploader (2022-10-28 22:31:14+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-10-29 22:54:38+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
NieWnen (2022-10-29 09:03:21+00:00): Dlaczego to rozdzielasz? To nie jest rekomendowany sposób tagowania.
SpinOff (2022-10-31 18:08:26+00:00): Oznaczyłem to tak samo jak jest po przeciwnej stronie Sokolej i tak samo jak reszta CPR-ów w okolicy. Tagowanie nie jest najlepsze, ale lepiej gdy w jednym ciągu komunikacyjnym zachowana jest jedna konwencja.
NieWnen (2022-10-31 18:18:32+00:00): To lepiej było raczej te 2 zmieniać :)
Oba są poprawne oczywiście. 

Warszawa ma po prostu bardzo dużo ścieżek, stąd ciężko, żeby nagle wszystkie były przetagowane na rekomendowany sposób, tak jak np. brakuje bardzo wielu przejazdów/przejść oznaczanych jako linie.
Kovoschiz (2023-09-07 13:42:17+00:00): `highway=service` + `area=yes` is correct here. The `=station` + `=bus_station` should be moved.
MushroomMan (2023-09-11 19:28:52+00:00): Thank you for this information Kovoschiz. Happy Mapping
martinst (2022-10-29 06:37:20+00:00): Hallo Freddy,
du hast den oberen Fahrweg unterbrochen und den Weg gelöscht, der Teil einer Skiabfahrts-Relation ist.
access=no wird nur gesetzt wenn die Verwendung nicht erlaubt ist, sagt aber nicht über die Schwierigkeit der Verwendung aus.
Revertiert in Changeset: 128198586
freddy_schuetz (2022-11-02 12:23:25+00:00): Hi Martin,
danke für den Hinweis! Ich habe die Zugangsbeschränkung nun geändert und Fußgänger ausgeschlossen, da dort definitiv kein Wanderweg mehr vorhanden ist! Die Skiroute sollte so ja trotzdem funktionieren.
Liebe Grüße, Freddy
NieWnen (2022-10-29 09:04:43+00:00): highway=path było poprawne i jest najczęściej używane w Polsce do oznaczania ścieżek pieszo-rowerowych.
SpinOff (2022-10-31 17:55:18+00:00): Faktycznie, poprawię to w najbliższym czasie.
Dodko (2022-10-30 18:54:16+00:00): Budovy je dobré zarovnávať do pravého uhla, klávesová skratka Q.

Ak je to samostatný rodinný dom namiesto building=house použiť building=detached
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
Patr1k_P (2022-10-31 08:10:56+00:00): https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/kataster/detail/kataster/parcela-c/827843/30_6?pos=48.496869,18.156154,18

a tu bola budova zlozena z 3 casti, ktore mali aj adresy, takze ste ich odstranili

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152777423
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152776658
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152777522

a dalsia budova s adresou, ktoru ste mali upravit a nie odstranit je tu

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/152776513

v prvom rade objekty sa maju upravovat kvoli zachovaniu historie
SomeoneElse (2022-10-29 12:10:25+00:00): The comment here would be better with "Filled in gap in..." and resulted in a reduction in the number of pieces:

Change in relation components for Airedale_Way 5297531
3c3
<      7
---
>      3
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5297531
http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=5297531
http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=5297531
Dave Venables (2023-01-22 09:03:14+00:00): I've added a note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3527361 questioning the use of alt_name=Carnarvon as this very old anglicised spelling has not been used for many decades. Suggesting old_name:en as a better tag
SomeoneElse (2022-10-29 00:05:31+00:00): Er no - per comment on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11783851 this was wrong and I've removed it.
eggie (2023-04-08 16:55:37+00:00): Hoi Xyberion

Kijk even hier welke tagging op een  fietspad hoort.

G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

Dus geen bicycle=designated op fietspaden.
foot=designated heb ik aangepast naar yes, maar dat is eigenlijk ook default.
Check svp waar je nog meer zaken zo hebt aangepast.
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128194659

MVG
eggie
Xyberion (2023-04-12 11:54:57+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Ik zal bicycle en foot = designated ook van de andere fietspaden op Koudenhoorn verwijderen. Foot=yes voeg ik wel toe, omdat het hier een park/hondenuitlaatgebied betreft en de fietspaden dus ook expliciet door voetgangers gebruikt (mogen) worden. Ik vind dat persoonlijk wat vollediger dan de default setting foot= niet nader bepaald.

Groet,
Wouter
eggie (2023-04-12 12:33:22+00:00): Oke Wouter.. bedankt voor je actie en reactie..
Groet..
eggie
ikopanjirukmana (2022-11-07 04:40:52+00:00): Hello, Liek1966.
I noticed you built several hotels in the same area. Is this true in the current situation?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128194698
diamondarmorsteve (2025-01-22 02:54:05+00:00): In the US, the place tag does not correlate one-to-one with legal status for many reasons. Therefore, some unincorporated communities such as Indian Land are tagged "village" or "town" based on their population and local significance.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-29 12:14:12+00:00): This filled in a gap in "Lôn Las Cymru (South) (5487293)" and also (because I forgot to close the changeset) "Hadrian's Wall Path (38791)".
SomeoneElse (2022-10-29 12:14:34+00:00): This filled in a gap in "Hadrian's Wall Path (38791)".
❤️‍🔥 (2022-10-29 21:49:10+00:00): Hi, you seem to have dragged a node 20km north, which has broken this footway https://osm.org/way/340785580

it's hard to review this changeset for other issues because its too big for software like OsmCha. but your other changeset has a similar issue
21Bede (2022-11-02 01:46:43+00:00): I think I've managed to revert this issue - apologies!
❤️‍🔥 (2022-11-02 07:21:33+00:00): thanks for fixing one of the issues, but it seems like most of the bridges you editted have been dragged, including the ones from the other changeset(s?)

for example, the one linked in my comment above is still broken
21Bede (2022-11-04 10:37:49+00:00): OK, I think this is now reverted as well. A check of a sample of other bridges in this changeset shows no others that have been moved.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-11-05 04:00:03+00:00): great, thanks for taking the time to fix this
canfe (2022-10-29 16:54:46+00:00): La WAY: 1107878359 potrebbe essere un park street side?
Ha un ingresso? sennò lo è.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128195004
RinBalzo (2022-10-29 17:34:17+00:00): Effettivamente sì, è proprio così. Ora correggo.
Frans S (2022-11-09 09:39:47+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
A remark. There is no need to map residential areas within a town. The outer borders of this town are already mapped as residential area.
Best regards
gscholz (2022-10-30 06:27:37+00:00): Hi,
this changeset has created a huge amount of errors in the OSM database (red markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=5.02321&lat=12.17915&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=128196176

My impression is you have destroyed buildings which originally had a circular shape.

Can you please fix this?

I am wondering how this could happen as JOSM typically complains if you try to upload such errors. Are you aware of how to use its internal validator?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

Kind regards
Guido
Becky Candy (2022-10-31 07:06:11+00:00): Thank you for flagging this, I have reverted the changeset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128196176
Frans S (2022-10-29 07:48:27+00:00): Hi Libor. Thanks for mapping on this project.
We ought to follow the tagging of highways in acc to the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
Look to the description of highway=track.
You often tagged a road connecting buildings, hamlets etc. as a track. 
In rural areas, like here, Unclassified is a better option, or path when it is rather narrow.
Best regards.
Supaplex (2022-10-29 15:59:25+00:00): Hi 
OpenStreetMap 記載公眾事物，如果是私人的地點請用書籤功能
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128196850
Robert Kania (2022-10-30 03:40:58+00:00): What's the reason for the section of the multi-use trail between Mill and Park having the tag "bike=yes" while the rest of the trail uses "bike=designated"?
TheAlyxGreen (2022-10-30 04:06:19+00:00): I didn't mark anything as bicycle=designated with this edit, so that must have been there before. 

I noticed that it was difficult to make edits to the area because the paths were so disjointed, so I looked for short sections of path that didn't have any reason to be separate from their connecting path and merged them so that, in the future, it will be easier to add metadata. Anything marked "designated" was either a glitch or was there before I edited this.
TheAlyxGreen (2022-10-30 04:08:19+00:00): Question, though, since you use those bicycle apps. What is the preferred way of tagging crosswalks? Bicycle=yes? bicycle=dismount? Just leave them blank?
Robert Kania (2022-10-30 05:38:16+00:00): Probably bicycle=yes. It has to be filled in though, not just left on the default yes, otherwise, the data isn't picked up.
 
Also, I do feel the bridges should be marked "designated" since it is mode separated and there is specific signage: https://photos.app.goo.gl/c3izAdKiGUinc4AT6
https://photos.app.goo.gl/SXCkcwqwWmyeUUkg6
TheAlyxGreen (2022-10-30 08:13:32+00:00): Do you know if that applies to all of the bridges? I felt like they might have signage, but I haven't used them in a couple years so I wasn't sure.
Anandhu SJ (2022-11-08 06:15:35+00:00): Why
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-29 08:20:45+00:00): Ciao. Puoi spiegarmi perché hai etichettato questa way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/89937450 Grazie, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-29 08:21:28+00:00): E anche questa? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1107897307
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-29 08:25:28+00:00): barrier=guard_rail??? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/834170755
❤️‍🔥 (2022-10-29 21:51:22+00:00): Hi, please see comments on https://osm.org/changeset/128194856 this changeset also broke a footway: https://osm.org/way/393909157

I would fix this myself, but iD doesn't let you edit it because it has overlapping geometry
21Bede (2022-11-02 01:45:25+00:00): Sorry about that, I think changes have been reverted.
Warin61 (2022-11-04 01:06:03+00:00): Hi,

The 'east 2' car park relation is not correct. The 'east 3' car park relation is correct. 

A multipolygons outer ways should not touch one another - that is the problem with the 'east 2' car park relation. Solution - make one outer way around the outside of the thing. Then make 2 inner ways for the trees ... job done.
Warin61 (2022-11-07 02:23:09+00:00): Hi,
Relation  	14744556 - 'South2' parking is faulty ... similar to the last one ... outer ways sharing segments... as it is mapped there is no need for this to be a relation at all. Simply map the outside way and tag that simple way as parking. 

Note a Quality Assurance too identifies these errors, that is how I find them. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.12208&lat=-33.78372&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Kuritsyn Roman (2022-11-03 15:51:23+00:00): Зачем удалили name:ru=Северо-Казахстанская область?
mavl (2022-11-03 16:37:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128446912 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128418168].
mavl (2022-11-03 16:37:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128446912 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets.  Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128418168].
Glassman (2022-10-30 03:15:44+00:00): I have some concerns about the number of highways you marked as private. I agree that the eastern portion of Bay View Road is private. Although I'm not sure about the name. 

I've walked the trails south of the Paccar center - none are private.

Both Sahalie Road and Garfield Lane my be privately maintained but I don't recall any posted signs not to trespass. 

Can you review your edit and post some proof as why these should be tagged as private. Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128198024
user_5359 (2022-10-30 12:09:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
SekeRob (2022-10-29 18:20:29+00:00): Render of the 325, now 327 member farmland has successfully restored. If the causing section suggests, the missing outline piece was last edited 5 years ago and view at 2km zoom and lower wtih no farmland showing confirms it's been longer broken. Je ne comprends pas pourquoi il a été cassé aussi longtemps.
fuchspl (2024-07-07 11:00:07+00:00): Możesz uzasadnić tag bicycle=no dla https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/188912300 ?
HSL_HRT (2022-11-04 10:01:33+00:00): Isn't this a duplicate with this one ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6060938885
JDu7 (2022-11-04 10:21:25+00:00): Possible but then this other point is wrongly located as the bouldering arena is on the eastern side. Would need to check...
HSL_HRT (2022-11-04 10:36:58+00:00): FYI I created a map note about this issue : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3427306
pio2_122 (2022-10-29 10:05:30+00:00): Ulica Ku Słońcu nie jest w drogą budowie. W OSM nie oznacza się krótkotrwałych zamknięć (nawet poprzez tag access=no).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:construction

Zmiany wycofane.
maciek-szn (2022-10-29 10:32:19+00:00): Koleś jest niereformowalny. Zmiany z dupy, brak opisów zmian i brak reakcji na komentarze.
charles chilufya (2022-10-30 22:37:29+00:00): @TUMAINI  Great works here and a friendly advise, make use of q and o to get correct and accurate shapes. keep mapping, great works.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/128200153