piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
santamariense (2019-03-10 13:50:07+00:00): Olá. Uma dúvida que surgiu na comunidade @osmrs no telegram: A posição da pinguela está correta? Nas imagens de satélite aparece um pouco mais para oeste. Ou mudou de local?
Pinguela em questão: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81290055 
Obs.: Fica mais adequado highway=path para estes casos. highway=pedestrian seria "calçadão".
Rodrigo de Avila (2019-03-11 11:57:12+00:00): Oi! Sinceramente não sei se a posição ainda é correta, já que mapeei esta pinguela na última vez que estive no local. Aliás, nem fazia ideia que já se passaram 8 anos :)

Quanto à etiquetagem, eu posso fazer a alteração para path, pode deixar. Usei pedestrian porque achei na época mais adequado: na época, pensei que em um caminho (path) podem passar pessoas a pé, bem como bicicletas/motos (por exemplo); mas nesta pinguela só dá pra passar pessoas a pé mesmo (pedestrian). Se precisar, ainda tenho uma foto desse lugar.
santamariense (2019-04-13 17:13:46+00:00): Valeu!
santamariense (2019-04-13 17:13:58+00:00): Valeu!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-15 07:39:19+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806418 ?
Davileci (2023-12-28 08:19:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11462172475
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 12:41:58+00:00): Hello!

I know that it is an ancient edit, but maybe you are still mapping in this area...

What you mapped as shop=internet in this edit ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)

It is about https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/950077682/history
Javier Sanchez (2018-01-26 20:40:40+00:00): En relación al etiquetado de colmenas, por favor visita esta página
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES_talk:Tag:craft%3Dbeekeeper
DiahW IRM-ED (2021-06-08 05:04:15+00:00): Hi, @fagervan. I deleted this way (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/82005595) based on Maxar imagery. Thank you
Mashin (2021-03-16 18:23:16+00:00): Hi, I am working on fixing rivers in Georgia. What the purpose of these small stream fragments?
e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82011473
I assume they were meant to indicate occasional flow. I am merging them and labeling as intermittent=yes. 
Is that correct?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-22 07:16:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/955950076

Again an ancient edit - but maybe you remember...

What you meant by https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2783285645/history ?

Is it an internet cafe (amenity=internet_cafe)?

Office where you can sign up for internet service?

Something related to online shopping (pickup point that nowadays is marked as shop=outpost? company office marked as office=company?)
*Martin* (2015-11-15 20:44:54+00:00): Ahoj. Na http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1230232 chyba osmc:symbol. Je to klasicka znacka naucneho chodnika?
NiCK_n17 (2015-11-16 07:41:03+00:00): Ahoj. Uz to bolo velmi davno,ale bola tam klasika, len cerveno-biele trojuholniky, a v lese uz chabo znacene.
joost schouppe (2018-05-25 10:09:16+00:00): precies al even geleden, maar deze is volgens mij fout: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/956010316
Polyglot (2018-05-25 11:01:52+00:00): By all means, voel u vrij om het te verbeteren! Ik ben daar toen langsgewandeld en heb het dan 's avonds allemaal ingegeven. Het ging me echter voornamelijk om de rwn routes, genummerd knooppuntenwandelnetwerk. Wist ik toen veel dat we ooit toegang zouden hebben tot officiële informatie.
bkil (2016-11-19 14:54:50+00:00): Hi. I'm delighted to see that you are also using the lunch tag. I have extended the wiki page. Would you be interested in giving some feedback on the discussion page?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lunch
woodpeck (2024-05-10 12:17:29+00:00): Hallo bahnpirat, in diesem Changeset wurde ein Teil der 380kV-Transversale von einer geraden Linie auf eine Linie mit 15 Nodes verfeinert - kannst Du Dich noch erinnern, welche Datenquelle Du dafür verwendet hast?
GerdP (2015-10-29 21:24:00+00:00): please review node 956272987:
what is meant with highway=riverside?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-12 07:17:18+00:00): "All rights reserved."? See for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82349060/history

So it is import done in violation of OSM license and should be reverted, right?

Have you done other edits like this?
sammuell (2022-02-12 19:37:02+00:00): Amazingly, including that nonsensical attribution was a term of the license at the time. The MLA imports were discussed on the talk-ca mailing list, and there were no concerns.

The current license (https://mli2.gov.mb.ca/app/register/app/index.php) suggests the attribution text may not be necessary since OSM would be a derivative product, so the attribution tag could probably be removed
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-20 07:30:39+00:00): > The current license (https://mli2.gov.mb.ca/app/register/app/index.php) suggests the attribution text may not be necessary since OSM would be a derivative product, so the attribution tag could probably be removed 

Are you sure that it is exactly the same dataset?

> The MLA imports were discussed on the talk-ca mailing list, and there were no concerns.

Was it discussed on imports mailing list and documented at OSM Wiki as required by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines (extra link to version of page at time of making that import: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Import/Guidelines&oldid=524190 ) ? Can you link to either?
sammuell (2022-02-22 01:35:28+00:00): Yes, the MLI database is basically unchanged since 2011

I'm not sure if it was discussed on the imports list. I did not initiate the work and the person who did is no longer active. Around about that time there were a bunch of overenthusiastic imports in Canada that didn't, we found out later, strictly follow procedure. Those have largely remained since they do not contaminate the data, but were just uploaded improperly

It was documented on the wiki at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Import/Catalogue&diff=531512&oldid=526628
ZeLonewolf (2022-02-22 04:15:26+00:00): Discussion thread on talk-ca:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2022-February/010343.html
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-22 08:14:27+00:00): > Yes, the MLI database is basically unchanged since 2011

In such case I would be happy to help with removal of this attribution tag if it is misleading and not needed.

But is there some way to check that this database has not changed significantly?

Given that noone was bothered by "All rights reserved." for over 10 years I am a bit suspicious about "everything is fine" claim.

And if I would be removing it then I want to be quite sure that it is actually not applicable.
sammuell (2022-02-27 02:28:11+00:00): Hi Mateusz

I just pulled up the shapefile from the  website, it hasn't been changed since 2005 according to the metadata

Sam
Lokai (2021-04-11 07:29:15+00:00): Hallo markobr.

Es geht um https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/963689924
Hast du eine Quellenangabe zum Namen dieser Quelle?
Zudem teilt sich die Quelle einen Knoten mit einem Weg.

Gruß

W.
Haris IRM-ED (2022-12-20 02:34:52+00:00): Hi Beddhist, your edit looks awesome.. but i found this road https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/83068901 is having crossing issue with waterbody, so due to my lack of local knowledge in that area please allow me to ask some question to improve this
1. Is this road still existed?
2. How is the current condition of this road? is the road i mention is periodically prone to flood?

If you also find that mentioned road is prone to be flooded, may i ask you to add flood_prone tag in that road.

Thank you, Happy Mapping
Beddhist (2022-12-21 04:58:25+00:00): Hi Haris, although this was 10 years ago I remember visiting this place. I have since learned that this was the old highway 2, replaced by the big road further East. The NE end is pretty much permanently under water, depending on the water level in the reservoir, so it's now a road to nowhere.

Cheers, 
Peter.
Haris IRM-ED (2022-12-22 02:02:17+00:00): Thanks Peter for providing helpful information, it really help me to fix the issue.

Best regard,
Haris
eggie (2020-09-14 08:11:38+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen .. bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
frosm (2019-06-03 20:52:06+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/968203842
vous souvenez vous ce que voulais dire note 1049 ? c'est une référence de l'asso ?
Chouloute (2019-06-04 07:19:54+00:00): Bonjour
Il y a quelques années maintenant j'ai demandé à l'association "refuges et cabanes Pyrénées" leur fichier des cabanes et je l'ai importé dans OSM.
Je ne me souviens plus bien de la signification "note 1049", j'imagine que c'est effectivement une référence interne à l'association.
mmd (2017-07-15 12:33:17+00:00): Die meisten Nodes in diesem cs haben kaputte Umlaute, z.b. Bad D�rkheim statt Bad Dürkheim
letihu (2021-09-10 19:22:42+00:00): Was könnte hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/969424697/history#map=19/51.98695/7.57217
für ein Tor im Wasser stehen, damit man den Graben überqueren kann?
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-01 17:14:26+00:00): Are the features you tagged "Outhouse" always pit or vault toilets (toilets:disposal=pit)?
Gppes (2016-05-08 12:46:41+00:00): Hi! Ich konnte bis jetzt keinen Hinweis finden, dass die Forststrasse den Namen "Hochangerstrasse" hat. Ist das wirklich so? Ansonsten muesste man den Namen loeschen.
user_5359 (2023-08-08 06:30:54+00:00): Hallo! Kannst Du bitte nochmal https://www.osm.org/relation/960484/history ansehen? 
name:ibnr = Ertl-Zentrum, Hallstadt
ref:ibrn = 469085
Welches Kürzel ibnr versus ibrn ist korrekt?
theophrastos (2023-08-08 16:10:47+00:00): War wohl ein Buchstabendreher, korrigiert.
toeklk (2019-11-17 19:31:58+00:00): Hi ghia,
It seems like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83490519 was 'taken back' by a farmer?  At least the path was completely invisible today...
ghia (2019-11-17 19:57:21+00:00): It's possible. I will check it out this week and delete it if it is gone.
It's not an Atlas way. Maybe at the time some people/farmers  has taken a shortcut. I don't remember. Greetz
toeklk (2019-11-18 20:26:19+00:00): Thanks! While you are there, could you also have a look if https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553071342 really/still exists (at least according to the strava heatmap, not many people pass there).
ghia (2019-11-18 22:59:16+00:00): I saw these roads also and i'm wondering if there should be one. Afaik, it's a private property and some pasture and orchard.
I'm very busy, but try to check it out.
alessandrocarmeli (2020-12-23 18:17:58+00:00): ciao, da dove hai trovato fuori le scale di via Smareglia?
Non sono mai esistite, c'è una strada senza uscita ostruita da paletti.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-24 20:55:32+00:00): 
Hello!

Sorry for bothering about an ancient edit.

But is PFM:garmin_type=0x2f03 meaning anything at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/972646568/history ?

Can you remove this tag or replace by more clear one? It looks like debris from GPS trace import, handling similar tags on this object would be appreciated
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-05 02:22:45+00:00): Ha agregado incorrectamente el punto de distancia de la autopista. Reclasifiqué lo mismo. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/973462519/history
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-20 17:59:01+00:00): Uso incorrecto de la etiqueta "place" con la etiqueta "highway=milestone". Eliminé la etiqueta "lugar".
lyctkel (2021-05-16 04:54:45+00:00): Hi Geogast,
what is the meaning of the description "Yahoo hires Saint Lucia"?
Geogast (2021-05-19 12:37:25+00:00): OK, 10 years ago… there were no Bing aerial images, but Yahoo images. Some people (including me) thought at that time that it would be a great idea to map the outlines (hires) of the aerial images. I forgot about these things. 20 hours ago, someone else deleted this one.
lyctkel (2021-05-20 04:29:26+00:00): Hi Geogast, 
ich muss mich entschuldigen, ich hielt dies für ein Easteregg. Siehe dazu auch https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=829963#p829963
frosm (2018-10-22 22:28:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Vous avez renseigné un parking souterrain
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/83656112
Sur la vue satellite on voit un parking aérien.
vous souvenez vous s'il y a 2 parking, un souterrain et un aérien ou si c'est une erreur ?
Cordialement
joost schouppe (2024-03-28 08:48:06+00:00): Just wanted to point out that
- some folks complained about the names introduced in this changeset (and others like it) here, are not locally used anymore
- the source appears to be the Atlas der Buurtwegen. Which is fine, but very very old. So the names of the places may have gone out of use.

If you are a local, and see names of  hamlets in Lebbeke that are not used anymore, feel free to delete them
Greguti (2026-01-24 13:06:34+00:00): Bonjour, le square du sentier du tir à Malakoff s'intitule désormais "Square Fabienne Chauvière", en hommage à la journaliste et écrivaine de Radio France qui habitait à Malakoff, décédée en 2024.
Supaplex (2016-07-29 04:21:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/972015821
請問有名稱嗎？而且是診所還是醫院？
eggie (2018-02-21 12:29:08+00:00): Na jaren weer aan het mappen daarom.. Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
GerdP (2015-10-29 21:16:44+00:00): please review node 687635356: 
what is meant with highway=rock_slide ? 
This tag is only used here, sounds a bit like 
a traffic_sign ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-22 17:22:29+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/975887155/history has building:name = ZV724 that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Is building:name for building name? In such case it would be much better to put it into name tag. If this object merges builing and POI inside such as museum or shop, then having separate objects for point of interest and building would be better idea, museum may have own area or node (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element ).

If it is an inscription then it should use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:inscription

If that is not a building name - what you wanted express by this tagging?
Constable (2018-02-02 17:44:31+00:00): esiste davvero questo supermercato https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/976077627 ? Che nome ha?
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-04-30 22:21:03+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/977983692 a point where I can fill my caravan with water?  Or a drinking fountain?
eggie (2018-06-01 20:34:18+00:00): Na jaren weer een edit... opnieuw.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Matthew Darwin (2017-08-18 17:34:50+00:00): Hi you put the name "Pebble Court" on a few roads.  I can find no reference to this being an official name (eg from City of Ottawa, Canada Post).  I have remove id.
Keeper of Maps (2017-08-18 20:54:58+00:00): I grew up in South Keys and the name "Pebble Court" applied to the cluster of townhouses. Street addresses are on Pebble, Cahill and Albion, I believe. Before removing this, I would have groundtruthed it.
Matthew Darwin (2017-08-18 21:07:12+00:00): Perhaps should be drawn as a shape around the area, and not specifically tagged on the roads?  There are no street signs for "Pebble Court"
Matthew Darwin (2017-08-18 21:12:37+00:00): I added that.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-11-05 04:50:11+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/980137493/history has shop = photograph that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=photograph ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=photo ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?
DaveF (2018-12-06 15:27:26+00:00): Hi
For footpaths the reference tag should be 'prow_ref'

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:prow_ref
kuhni74 (2022-11-11 16:29:47+00:00): Ist trotz der verstrichenen 12 Jahre noch nachvollziehbar, wo die Seehöhe der Oberen Glocknerscharte herkommt? In der 11.Auflage (2010) von Willi End's AV-Führer (Rother) steht nämlich "3756m", nicht "3766m". Vielleicht ein Lesefehler aus der AV-Karte? Oder End hat die Höhe von einer Auflage zur nächsten revidiert? Angesichts der recht unstrittigen Seehöhe des Kleinglockners (3770m) wäre ein Höhenunterschied von nur 4m zur Oberen Glocknerscharte wohl zu gering, wenn man sich so Photos ansieht (ich war selbst noch nicht oben).
ChrissW-R1 (2017-12-18 13:13:14+00:00): Please have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1241749
ChrissW-R1 (2017-12-18 13:19:47+00:00): Please have a look at
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1241754
trial (2017-07-22 19:13:12+00:00): Bonjour, le Bureau SNSM ne serait-il pas plutôt 
emergency=lifeguard_base  si c'est une  station SNSM
FR:Tag:emergency=water_rescue_station pour un simple poste de surveillance
Elyana IRM-ED (2022-12-20 04:17:32+00:00): Hi, Beddhist.
Your edit looks awesome. I'd like to inform you that I have to split the highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/84837491) due to crossing with a water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/779904067) and added a tag on the part of it as a bridge. Please let me know if you have any other suggestion.
Thank you. Happy mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-06-15 07:50:28+00:00): if you are by any chance still visiting this area - can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4806433 ?

Construction was finished, right?
cschliz (2026-03-31 00:43:27+00:00): Änderung Siebeneichgasse 12 => Biedermanngasse 12 ist falsch, siehe:  #180651506
Владимир К (2017-04-11 14:48:49+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/986916353 это же просто сарай отмечен местом? переделываю?
SomeoneElse (2018-12-13 16:08:47+00:00): I'm guessing https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/986939262 should be "corps" and not "core"?  Or maybe it's a pun I'm missing...
Malcolm Boura (2018-12-13 20:01:31+00:00): Or my speeling was even worse than usual! I have fixed it. Should be corps. Thank you.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-21 07:32:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85147079/history

Hello!

What you meant by shop=plastic here?

What kind of plastic objects are they selling there? Are they really selling solely plastic objects?

Is maybe one of shops listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop a better fit?

Sorry for asking about truly ancient edit but maybe you are still visiting this area or remember it...
jodd (2023-03-11 18:20:20+00:00): Hallo baeuchle.
vor vielen Jahren hast du hier ein geplantes Wendegleis eingetragen. Im Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3271518 fragt ein anderer User, wo das herkommt. Kannst du uns sagen, welche Quelle du damals hattest? Weißt du, ob es entsprechende Planungen für ein Wendegleis hier noch gibt oder ob das längst Geschichte ist?
VG Jo
eggie (2021-12-14 14:55:36+00:00): Na jaren weer een bijdrage.. daarom opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-07-27 08:45:06+00:00): Dag Ruud... Staat die school er al od is dit nog eigenlijk construction?
MVG
eggie
Zie... 
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=27-07-2021&loc=51.83289%2C5.008462%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-07-24&acqid=20220724_110840_SV1-04&sensor=SuperView-1
ruudblank (2022-07-27 09:52:10+00:00): Al weer even geleden dat ik wat in OSM heb gewijzigd. School en parkeerterrein zijn gesloopt, terrein wordt bouwrijp gemaakt (opgehoogd met zand). Verbindingsweg naar Ruigenhoek is ook verdwenen; er loopt nu een tijdelijke(?) verbindingsweg op de plek van de school die aansluit op Ruigenhoek thv nr. 71.
eggie (2022-07-27 10:06:40+00:00): Ahhh.. dus de school en parkeerterrein kunnen weg?

Groet
Eggie
eggie (2022-07-27 10:28:11+00:00): Ruud,
De school heb ik verwijderd en voorlopig landuse=construction toegevoegd mbv sat dataportaal.
Die tijdelijke weg heb ik ingetekend als residential.
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=27-07-2021&loc=51.83291%2C5.007159%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2022-07-24&acqid=20220724_110840_SV1-04&sensor=SuperView-1

Bedankt voor de tips. 

Groet
eggie
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-14 04:31:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/85389940 - do you know if this is still under construction? Imagery is inconclusive
hulius (2016-06-20 09:03:37+00:00): Well, these are actually abandoned works on this road. As you can see, it's an alternative way a few meters southern completely functional so I'm afraid it never going to be concluded. What do you think it's the better option to tag this situation?
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-20 09:14:08+00:00): I think if its physically ok to drive on and connects to places, marking it as a highway service/residential/etc is OK. 

I just rechecked bing/mapbox imagery and it looks as though road is physically there...
marc__marc (2021-04-01 12:31:40+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/992585216
a quel batiment se rapporte cette info ?
et comment avez-vous fait pour avoir une hauteur si précise ?
Cordialement,
Marc
skyper (2016-10-20 23:25:34+00:00): War hast Du denn damals meine mühsam gesammelten detailinformationen über die Treppe nordöstlich der Schnewlinbrücke gelöscht ? Habs mal wieder aus der Versenkung geholt.
Warin61 (2017-06-21 23:24:13+00:00): Multipolygons don't do shared ways on outers.. 
So these might be best as simple separate ways. 
Doing this generates a warning - overlapping railways. I think that is ok - platforms do share segments.
aharvey (2017-06-23 07:44:15+00:00): I'm okay with them being separate ways.

Physically the whole area is one platform, but logically (in terms of the network and naming) each side is a different platform.

So for simplicity, I'm happy with these being separate ways, without the relation with a shared border that way we have tags for the different platforms but anyone can post process the two ways sharing the common edge into one if they'd prefer that..
ivanbranco (2022-04-17 08:11:38+00:00): Hi katpatuka,

I know it's a 11 years old changeset, but since you're still an active user I try anyway, it's possible that the place=* value here was supposed to be the name=* value?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4516496
katpatuka (2022-04-17 08:18:50+00:00): Of course! :D

I've fixed it.
emergency99 (2021-02-06 19:16:34+00:00): Was genau soll der Markt namens Arbeiterstrich sein?
fkv (2021-02-06 19:35:53+00:00): Ein Platz, wo Schwarzarbeiter in der Früh auf Auftraggeber warten. Allerdings sind mir hier schon länger keine mehr aufgefallen. Anscheinend haben sie sich einen anderen Platz gesucht, keine Ahnung wo.
emergency99 (2021-02-06 21:12:16+00:00): Und hat das dann wirklich was in der OSM zu suchen? Und ist das dann echt ein Markt? Mappen wir auch normale "Straßenstriche" als Märkte?
fkv (2021-02-06 21:24:31+00:00): Wenn dir ein besseres Tag einfällt, sag es. Ja, natürlich hat das was in OSM zu suchen, wenn es vor Ort auffindbar ist.
emergency99 (2021-02-06 22:20:10+00:00): Vor ort auffindbar ist interessant. Wenn da hin und wieder eine Gruppe an Menschen steht ist es noch nicht insofern "auffindbar". Wenn ich mir das auf StreetView ansehe ist das ein leerer Bereich, wo nichts auf irgendetwas hindeutet. Da würde am ehesten noch "landuse=brownfield" passen. Das ist nämlich was in der Realität immer da ist. Eine Unbebaute, gatschige Fläche. Aber meiner Ansicht nach muss sowas in keine Karte rein, ausser man will eine Karte mit nur grenzwertig oder illegalen Sachen aufziehen. Aber die wäre dann wohl kaum öffentlich im Internet...