piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 15:59:13+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 11014983 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 18:41:00+00:00): Olá,

ver tambem a restrição de conversão 11014981
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 18:59:50+00:00): Olá,

ver tambem a restrição de conversão 11014982
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 20:14:10+00:00): Olá,

ver tambem a restrição de conversão 11014984
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 23:56:19+00:00): Olá,

ver tambem a restrição de conversão 11014980
eggie (2020-04-20 07:54:34+00:00): Dag Kied... 
Wanneer je iets tijdelijk wilt veranderen dan graag een extra tag erbij en opening_hours intact laten.. conform wiki.. 
opening_hours:covid19=*
Dit waren je edits.. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=83786347
MVG,
Eggie
Kied67 (2020-04-20 10:41:29+00:00): Hallo Eggie,

Bedankt voor de info. Is dit beter?

Mvgr,

Kied
eggie (2020-04-20 11:23:39+00:00): Dag Kied. In ieder geval beter.. Er loopt momenteel een discussie op het osm forum dit wel of niet te taggen..
Gr Eggie
Atakua (2020-04-19 21:46:29+00:00): Oops, incorrect description to the edit. Should have been somthing about survey
mapman44 (2020-04-19 23:07:07+00:00): The speed limit is on an administrative boundary. Did you intend for it to be on a street?
Bizzle_Bailey (2020-04-20 00:17:42+00:00): My mistake. I meant to put it on a street but it would not let me select the street.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 15:40:27+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 11015077 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 22:04:14+00:00): Olá,

ver também a relação de restrição 11015076
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 23:51:03+00:00): Olá,

ver também a relação de restrição 11015075
mapman44 (2020-04-19 23:03:19+00:00): Did you adjust the alignment of your background satellite imagery before moving things? Here's the Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
dead10ck (2020-04-19 23:09:33+00:00): Hello. That is in fact why I made this change. I had just learned that you have to offset the background imagery, and after I did so, I fixed all the positions of the houses I just mapped. Thanks for your helpful info!
phidauex (2020-04-20 05:30:14+00:00): Hi, I agree that a relation is the right way to do this, but the tagging may need to be updated a bit. I believe current practice is that the relation should be "type=boundary" rather than multipolygon, and instead of protected_area=nature, the tag "protect_class=5" would be more appropriate. The leisure=nature_reserve and landuse=recreation_ground are possibly redundant, but I've been including them on a lot of similar open spaces in CO to make sure they get scooped up by the data consumers, though in the future I think the protect_class tag is more precise.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83787470
gpserror (2020-04-20 06:21:38+00:00): Hmm... Kind of a tough call.  With it marked type=boundary instead of multipolygon it no longer seems to recognize it as two areas and just as a boundary.  I'm not sure what these should be considered as - like a city boundary or a polygon like landuse? 

Indeed it seems having both leisure= and landuse=recreation does seem redundant, but it is possible for protected area to have leisure prohibited, and that numerical denotation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area seems really confusing, ugh.  Feel free to change it, I was hoping to change as little as possible from the previous configuration hence the original tagging remained.
phidauex (2020-04-20 15:49:09+00:00): The numerical designations are indeed confusing... As for the relation type, "multipolygon" was deprecated a while back for boundaries, it is best to use type=boundary. It is OK that iD doesn't call this an "area", the rest of the system knows what a boundary is.

As for the other tags, I believe "protected_area=nature" to just be a mistake, that isn't a documented tag with any consistent use, I think "protect_class=5" or maybe 6 is most appropriate, alongside recreation_ground and/or nature reserve, depending on the use of the land.

Check out South Table Mountain Park's relation, which I updated a while back while making open space areas in Boulder/Denver/Jeffco more consistently tagged: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7088454
gpserror (2020-04-20 16:09:55+00:00): Okay, made some changes in changeset #83831641 - Kind of tough to categorize this natural area - as far as I know there's nothing special about this land other than a creek goes through it.  Pretty much just leaving it open and letting people walk through it on the designated paths (i.e. no camping, etc.) but mainly letting it be a gap to prevent more urban sprawl / development.

This is a bit different than Long View Farm Open Space to the south.  This is yet a different category, and it too needs to be worked on...
phidauex (2020-04-20 16:52:48+00:00): Thanks, that looks good for now. I do think there is some work to be done in classifying Open Space, as we do it in Colorado - it defies a lot of normal tagging because it is protected, but also not really "for" anything - it is just space that is intentionally kept open, but with somewhat vague uses. In Boulder, it can be a nature reserve, but it can also be leased out to farmers.

In any event, this way you are at least tagged consistently with the others in the state, and when some better plan comes together for tagging open space, it will be easy to find and update.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-20 10:22:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83814686 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the South China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3643
KiaaTiX (2020-04-19 23:19:14+00:00): Teruggedraaide wijzigingensets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83745160
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83745234
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83745934
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746015
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746113
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746229
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746354
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746417
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746471
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746494
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83746746
dvdhoven (2020-04-20 08:00:23+00:00): Had je niet beter eerst eens op het forum kunnen reageren voor je dit soort reverts gaat doen?
En heb je dit met Martin overlegd?
KiaaTiX (2020-04-20 08:43:49+00:00): Ik wil toch graag benadrukken dat deze revert gaat om de kwaliteit van de oorspronkelijke changesets. Als je een andere persoonlijke voorkeur hebt en het er niet mee eens bent dan is dat prima. Maar je moet niet zomaar uit frustratie willekeurig maar dingen gaan weggooien. Voorbeeld in deze changeset is de begraafplaats west die voor de helft weggevaagd was (neem dan het westelijke deel ook mee zou ik zeggen). Als het maar half gebeurt dan krijg je alleen maar gaten in de kaart. Heb echt geen zin om een heuse edit oorlog te beginnen, maar ga ook niet wachten op reactie op een handje vol changesets die duidelijk uit frustratie gemaakt zijn.
mapman44 (2020-04-22 05:18:52+00:00): This appears to be an import. Did you follow the import guidelines from the Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83787738
Jack the Ripper (2020-05-29 03:38:55+00:00): Good catch, Trent.  Thank you.
user_5359 (2020-04-20 04:01:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short hint for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/793660269: Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
pitscheplatsch (2020-04-20 05:28:51+00:00): Hi BaconRidge, welcome to OSM.

If a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no tag and don't delete the way. I think we should revert this changeset.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=83789766

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
artem95vlasovets (2020-05-19 08:39:52+00:00): Hi! You created a lot of dragged nodes in this changeset. For example, nodes 5687876258, 540432189, 540432168 and dragged way 597353650.  Please fix this. Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83789801
padam_lucas (2021-07-12 16:25:32+00:00): Hi @DannyMcD, is it possible to update this street so it doesn't belong to l'Ange-Gardien (the town closeby).?
DannyMcD (2021-07-12 20:11:29+00:00): Hi @padam_lucas, I'm not sure what street you're referring to.  I'm also not sure what you mean when you say the street belongs to l'Ange-Gardien.  Streets don't really belong to towns in OSM, except by location (i.e. lying partially/fully within the borders of the town).  Third parties (eg. Nominatim) use OSM data in various ways to say streets are in towns, sometimes inaccurately. I can fix the border between L'Ange Gardien and Gatineau if that is wrong, but I doubt that will fix your problem.
padam_lucas (2021-07-13 09:19:52+00:00): Hi @DannyMcD, thanks for the feedback. Exactly I check this street on nominatim there are 1 town (Buckingham) and 1 village (L'Ange-Gardien):
https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=W&osmid=88265063&class=highway
And when I use Algolia search (based on OSM) the street is considered as in L'Ange-Gardien, but that's not true. 
Is there a way to fix it?
DannyMcD (2021-07-13 14:24:32+00:00): I've split Rue Joseph so that the way is fully within Buckingham/Gatineau.  It looks like a small portion of Rue Joseph fell within L'Ange-Gardien, which is probably why Algolia says it is within L'Ange-Gardien.  The Nominatim listing is already fixed, I'm not sure about the Algolia search result.  It could take weeks or months for it to update, depending on how often it pulls OSM data.
padam_lucas (2021-07-13 16:43:56+00:00): Thanks Danny, great! Next time I can do the same if I find this again.
gscholz (2020-04-21 04:22:40+00:00): Hi Alma,
your recent changesets have created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-90.25733&lat=20.03765&zoom=12&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-90.25733&lat=20.03765&zoom=12&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Guido
pitscheplatsch (2020-04-20 05:30:19+00:00): Hi intrinsicrm, welcome to OSM.

Please don't just remove existing data.
I think we should revert this changeset.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=83790908

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
intrinsicrm (2020-04-20 05:37:43+00:00): Hi,

I was going to redo the data for the golf course since the lines for the carts and tee boxes etc are not lining up properly. I intend to remap the full course this Monday.  We could revert but the golf cart would be really painful to move around rather than starting clean. Is this okay?
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:50:26+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
seav (2020-05-14 14:33:15+00:00): Hi! If I understand this changeset correctly, you replaced the previous boundary geometry for Sanchez Mira and Pamplona with the dataset from Project NOAH. However, the previous geometry included those municipalities' municipal waters which gives municipal governments jurisdiction over things like fishery rights.
karson_ (2020-04-21 23:36:57+00:00): It looks like all of the "offices" you added were pretty inaccurate in shape and label. Are you actually getting this information from LiDAR scans?

Since you are using the iD editor, if you right click an object there is an option to square. You can also select the object and press Q which will also square the object.

It seems to me like all of those buildings should be either labelled as "Building" or as "House".
Jeff50316 (2020-04-23 13:49:17+00:00): I’m going to use lidar data to Import the course to the golf club 19. The software I use pulls data from open street. And the soft wear only recognizes offices. So I just but those there fro a reference of where builds are TGC19
aixbrick (2020-04-21 16:10:50+00:00): Hallo,
in diesem Gebäude, das eher ein Gartenhaus ist, ist bestimmt kein Ferienapartment untergebracht. Haus Nr. 65a ist zudem weiter links und das "name"-Tag ist nur für Eigennamen, nicht für Beschreibungen gedacht.
Gelöscht mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7424234685.
Gruß
topius (2020-04-20 07:04:21+00:00): Hi, 

Great that you are drawing in Oil Palm Plantations. They should be tagged as orchards, though, not farmland. See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dorchard
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-19 05:28:58+00:00): Das MaxSpeed=60, gilt das wirklich in beide Richtungen? Vermutlich nur auf der Abfahrt.
Geo-Tobi (2024-09-19 05:29:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288782997
Shell Egypt (2020-05-29 20:49:51+00:00): Name: Blue Shell sporting goods
Mobile: +20-10-20-30-1006\7\8 
Fax: +202-33779298
Website: https://www.shellegypt.com
Facebook: www.fb.com/BlueShellEgypt
Hours of Operation: From Sunday to Thursday from 11.00 am to 11.00 pm
Category: Sporting Goods / Fitness Equipment / Sports Supplies & more.
address: A branch of the Blue Shell Company in Hadayek al-Ahram, 127N, Al-Khazzan Street

Blue Shell is supplier for customers in a wide range of markets. We supply and install a complete line of commercial fitness equipment for all strength, training areas and gyms. With sporting goods for everyone and even kids.
For more information, please call us or Whatsapp, 01020301006/7/8 - from Sunday to Thursday from 12 am to 3 pm
user_5359 (2020-04-20 16:10:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
eggie (2020-04-21 09:02:57+00:00): What do you think is the effect of your edits?
These are all multipolygons!
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=83800690
No comment?  
Gr eggie
sovereign_ch (2020-04-20 15:25:46+00:00): Hoi. Ist die Weströhre wieder offen? Weil der User der den Gegenverkehr "gezeichnet" hat, hat damals die Weströhre gesperrt (access=no), siehe [1]. Falls du dir bezüglich der Rückanpassungen nicht sicher bist einfach fragen. Grüsse

[1] https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69778909
banchetto (2020-04-21 10:42:36+00:00): Hallo sovereign_ch, vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Die Weströhre war eigentlich nie gesperrt, während der Bauzeit stand lediglich immer nur 1 Fahrspur zur Verfügung, deswegen hat man eine zweite Spur in der Oströhre zur Verfügung gestellt. Bin heute nochmal vorbeigefahren: Weströhre komplett frei (hab es angepasst), Oströhre weiterhin einspurig befahrbar und prov. zweite Spur "obendurch" .
Viele Grüsse
lefuturiste (2024-01-25 14:40:08+00:00): C'est encore un vrai chemin? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162943759
eggie (2020-04-20 07:51:04+00:00): Dag Loekie,
Wellicht nog adresnode 58 weghalen?
Gr eggie
Loekie1976 (2020-04-20 09:48:38+00:00): Ga ik doen, dank voor de tip.
catdreamer (2020-04-30 11:51:40+00:00): 此地點在路中央無建物
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 17:50:47+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?
Alexey Belousov (2020-05-21 06:54:25+00:00): Здравствуйте. Постараемся локализовать правки по какой-либо области\стране. Если есть пожелания как именно дожен выглядеть changeset это сильно поможет.
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 17:50:25+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?
Lee Carré (2021-12-11 20:54:30+00:00): What corrections, exactly?

What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
martinst (2022-07-22 19:50:08+00:00): Laut https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kraftwerk_Kesselbach beträgt die Leistung des Kraftwerks 200 kW, woher stammt die 100kW Angabe, was ist richtig?
user_10868245 (2022-07-23 09:02:49+00:00): Wird wohl ein Schreibfehler sein! Nach meinem Wissensstand und Angaben von Uniper sind 0,2MVA = 200kw richtig.
martinst (2022-07-23 11:56:57+00:00): Leistung aktualisiert in Changeset: 123972822
SomeoneElse (2020-05-31 22:40:00+00:00): With regard to the fixme on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169566781 , I think you're going to have to ask your drivers.  This is a private chemical plant, and I suspect that the management would take a dim view of the public wandering around there.
YaStratospheric (2020-06-01 07:55:18+00:00): Thank you for your comment. Since this is a private chemical plant, a tag access=private has been added for service roads.
Please tell me, maybe you have some kind of information on which service roads need to leave tag access=no?
SomeoneElse (2020-06-04 20:03:45+00:00): I'm guessing that you're looking for something that says "you're not allowed to drive down here, even if you're delivering something and therefore would have access to places that most people wouldn't, such as those labelled access=private"?

That's a good question, and I'm not sure that OSM has a good settled answer to that.  Perhaps a question for the tagging list?
YaStratospheric (2020-06-04 21:33:33+00:00): Yes, you are right.

Maybe you have a suggestion on a suitable list of tags so that this case can be solved as correct as possible?
PlaneMad (2020-09-14 16:37:33+00:00): Wow, amazing work adding sidewalks
Marcussacapuces91 (2021-12-26 19:25:45+00:00): Je vous ai mis quelques exemples de bonnes pratiques de numérotations, je vous laisse poursuivre
Deane Kensok (2020-04-20 14:26:29+00:00): Thanks for restoring this tag.  The tag was deleted inadvertently (and unknowingly) while I was adding features in another city called Beaumont.  I'm not sure how the edit was made, but will try to figure that out.
Viajero Perdido (2020-04-20 17:31:46+00:00): Uh, while on the subject...  How does wee Beaumont qualify as a "city" by OSM standards?  Remember, we map to OSM criteria, not political ones.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity

"Largest settlement" is Edmonton, not Beaumont nor the other burbs.
Carnildo (2020-04-20 18:09:33+00:00): I don't know.  You'll have to ask Mesowhite, who was the one who originally made it a city: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65947260
jonorossi (2020-04-21 02:28:00+00:00): Hi, I think you'd make a mistake here in your tagging with Minnippi Parklands. You've changed the name of the park (or group of parks, so many different names on signs in there) and tagged it with natural=water which it is not. I agree that this area is flood prone, but only small sections are actually wetlands.
Warin61 (2020-04-23 08:03:52+00:00): Hi,

Would not the parking areas, softball etc be part of the parklands? I realize that was not done by you , but you are more local than me.
jonorossi (2020-04-23 13:50:22+00:00): @Warin61, so everyone is on the same page, I assume you saying there is no need for the parking, dog park, picnic shelter, playground and softball areas (someone went overboard) to be inner members of the Parklands relation because they are actually just features of the park?
Warin61 (2020-04-23 22:57:30+00:00): I would think they are all park of the park, maintained by the same operator etc. I see no reason to exclude them, but than I am not familiar with the area.
jonorossi (2020-04-24 03:00:30+00:00): @Warin61 completely agree, it is all owned by BCC including the model aero club, I didn't know a public golf course is coming. Their web site confirms they are all community facilities: https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/things-to-see-and-do/council-venues-and-precincts/parks/minnippi-parklands

@JonathanMBunker, since you are doing great work adding features to the parklands I'll leave fixing the relations to you.
user_5359 (2020-04-20 16:07:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
eggie (2020-04-20 08:42:00+00:00): Dag Floris,
Zie ook forum voor "corona tagging" 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=69154
MVG,
Eggie
FlorisGeo (2020-04-20 08:51:13+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Dank voor je bericht! We zijn naast de rolstoelapp ook bezig met een afhaalkaart, maar daar worden nu nog geen cateraars in opgenomen. We gaan kijken of we dit kunnen aanpassen.

Groet,

Floris
Leo Slager (2020-04-21 08:38:55+00:00): Dag Essex_Boy,
Door onzorgvuldig werken staat nu het hele duingebied van Den Haag tot Wassenaarse Slag blanco op de kaart.
Een aantal fouten kon ik makkelijk herstellen:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=4.33103&lat=52.13471&zoom=12&opacity=0.89
Zo een ingewikkeld gebied moet je niet met Potlatch gaan bewerken, dat maakt veel te veel fouten. Ik raad je dringend aan om over te stappen naar JOSM. Dan wordt veel van deze fouten afgevangen door de ingebouwde validatie functies.
Leo Slager (2020-05-20 23:55:43+00:00): Hi Voorwaarts,
Door het omdraaien van de richting van de highway (naar de rotonde toe) zijn alle tags met backward als foutief aangemerkt.
En het opknippen van de rotonde heeft de routerelaties van bus 658 beschadigd.
Eea is weer gerepareerd. :-)
amilopowers (2020-08-20 22:20:15+00:00): Hoi TripleBee

Darf ich fragen warum du bei der Madretschstrasse (way 363344403), nordöstlich des Brühlpatzes bis zur Gleis Unterquerung ein "oneway=no" setzt? 

Ich komme da täglich vorbei und weiss, dass dies eine Einbahnstrasse für Autos und Motorräder ist.

Ich bitte dich nur Änderungen vorzunehmen von welchen du zu 100% sicher bist, dass sie korrekt sind. Beim kleinsten Zweifel solltest du das Ändern lassen, so tue ich es jedenfalls.

Danke, dass du Kartopgraphierst!

Liebe Grüsse
Ueli