piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
philippec (2022-08-13 21:50:30+00:00): Hoboken Sporthal Kiel AED.
Is er iets veranderd ?
OSM is niet gelijk aan GRB hier en dat maakt het verschil tussen binnen en buiten. https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=3924861444268916
H4N5-antw (2022-08-14 06:18:08+00:00): Dank voor uw opvolging : ééns recent prentje beschikbaar : hangt buiten, onder afdak, aan 'binnenzijde' zijmuur, tussen rolluik op https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=237910324800536 en hoek kotje.
Lyon-St-Clair (2022-09-06 20:01:00+00:00): Merci de ne pas utiliser le tag "bus guidé" pour une voie de bus si ces bus n'ont pas de guidage optique.
SzymonH (2022-12-26 22:10:28+00:00): Którędy wobec tego jest dojście do peronu?
Fan Transportu (2022-12-26 22:29:50+00:00): Pod kątem prostym do peronu, w kierunku budynku nr 21. Na końcu ma zawijas na zachód.
SzymonH (2022-12-27 07:21:07+00:00): Dodałem na podstawie znalezionych przeze mnie danych: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130542745
Hufkratzer (2022-08-13 21:49:35+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086077023 sieht im Luftbild typisch aus wie ein Reitplatz, den würde ich als Reitplatz taggen, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz . Im iD einfach "Reitplatz" eingeben und auswählen. Das Reitanlagen-Tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding) ist für eine komplette Anlage incl. Stall usw. geeignet.
user3721 (2022-08-13 22:25:18+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, passe ich morgen an :)
Sosha1996 (2022-08-13 21:18:14+00:00): Source: http://www.gcmap.com/diagrams/pdf/EGLL.pdf
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
bxl-forever (2022-08-13 21:56:04+00:00): Tip of the day: upload your changes more frequently, certainly before travelling for one part of the country to another.  This will avoid creating huge bounding boxes like this one, which is annoying for all of us reviewing changes in Belgium.
CyclingPuschel (2022-08-14 01:32:52+00:00): Sorry, I will try. Could you please elaborate on how reviewing works and how it is affected by the bounding box? Do you review things that are local and with such a big box you open it only to find out, there is nothing in your area? Would not uploading as a closed change set help?
Usually I try to upload every few days, which limits the area (probably still too big of a box?).
Still yesterday and today we had to race to get across Belgium and just had sleeping in our minds as soon as we arrived in Brussels.
But now I know and I'll try to upload every 50km or so :)
bxl-forever (2022-08-17 09:37:25+00:00): On the main osm.org website, the "History" button on top of the screen shows the latest changes in any given area.

Each changeset is shown with its own bounding box.  The bounding box is defined by the two modified objects that are the farthest apart.  As you can see, this change covers the whole of Brussels, and also Leuven, and showed up in our data feeds, despite no data was modified in those areas.

That’s exactly what you describe in the first part of your reply.  If you can upload all your changes after you’re finished in one area, that will be just perfect.

Of course, we’ve seen much worse than that—some mappers do one small change in Brasil and one in Moscow and that will cover half of the planet and annoy much more people.

Happy mapping.
Famlam (2022-08-19 09:50:17+00:00): Hi km2bp,

Regarding your edit of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7982756386 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/856116671

Please note that we do tag the addresses in separate nodes in The Netherlands. This is because a single building can house many different addresses, which may even change as they're not bound to the building. Can you please restore this?
Famlam (2022-08-19 09:57:58+00:00): (Actually I spotted some more, so I fixed it myself https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125098931)
eggie (2022-08-19 10:06:58+00:00): Hi KM..
We asked this again and again...
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=3610826

Greetz
Eggie
mariotomo (2022-08-13 22:19:05+00:00): hi. thanks for adding information to OSM. please be careful about joining objects: roads and buildings generally do not share nodes. also, remember to use the 'Q' (square) function for buildings (generally buildings *are* square like all 90° angles. generally.)
mariotomo (2022-08-13 22:26:09+00:00): hi. I see you have (attempted to) solve issues here. some of what you did went fine, but you also added quite improbable geometries. maybe you want to review. like the houses at way:1030239608 and way:1030239559.

thanks for caring for quality.
user_5359 (2023-04-17 16:34:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1086089551 (one of twelve objects). What is the mean of the tag type;wood=reused ? Why did you use a semicolon instead of a colon (or underscore)?
mariotomo (2022-08-13 23:18:43+00:00): hi, are you sure of your contribution? you did not provide a comment, and without some form of description for your changeset, a reviewer cannot know if you touched something that interests them, and we can't check whether you after all really did what you intended to do.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
felipeeugenio (2022-08-14 13:27:15+00:00): Gracias Alejandro. Eso si por favor ojo con la ortografía. Ya lo voy a arreglar. saludos
user_2066394 (2022-08-14 11:20:28+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
syntex (2022-08-14 13:08:13+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że ona też jest jednokierunkowa podobnie jak ta druga po drugiej stronie, mimo namalowanych znaków rowerowych z obu stron. Jest tak samo wąska, a spotkanie się z rowerzystą z naprzeciwka mogłoby się skończyć źle. Muszę jeszcze raz tam się kiedyś wybrać.
ZeroJeden (2022-08-14 13:43:12+00:00): Chodzi o to że oznakowanie jest nieprawidłowe. W zamyśle urzędników było zrobienie tego odcinka jednokierunkowym, ale oznakowanie jest błędne, co powoduje że można legalnie jeździć w obie strony. Inna sprawa to fakt, że pomysły urzędników na jednokierunkową północną stronę są kompletnie bez sensu. Nie przestrzega tego (jak sądzę) 90% użytkowników, ale też jazda w obie strony nie stwarza żadnego problemu. W wielu miejscach urzędnicy sami świadomie doprowadzają do dużo niebezpieczniejszych konstrukcji, na przykład sadząc wysokie żywopłoty i krzaki do samego skrzyżowania zasłaniając widoczność, lawirując krętymi i jeszcze węższymi DDR między krzaczorami. Ten odcinek ma bardzo dobrą widoczność i jest prosty, jedynąjego wadą to szerokość, ale i ona nie jest ekstremalnie mała.
SomeoneElse (2022-08-15 15:01:17+00:00): Hello mynamejeff,
This is the second time you've made an odd edit to https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/13513558 .
Please don't do that.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-15 15:04:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124932701 where the changeset comment is: Revert implausible changes.  See comments at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mynamejeff/history .
TrevorAlan (2022-08-16 18:15:12+00:00): I have already asked you not to make fake fantasy edits for likely Pokémon Go spawns. Please contact Niantic and Peterson SFB public relations team to get them to change the ban.
aTarom (2022-08-14 06:13:28+00:00): Hi CycleStreets,
do you have more info about tag
wheelchair_landings=yes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086096305/history
Thanks
CycleStreets (2022-08-14 13:00:12+00:00): The ramp has around seven flat areas along it, which enable wheelchair users to rest.

There is currently no documented OSM tag. So we have made up the tag in expectation of future support. If you can find a better tag, e.g. wheelchair_resting=yes or whatever, please do change.
aTarom (2022-08-15 06:22:14+00:00): Thanks for the explanation, if you like you can participate in this thread
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-to-tag-an-inclined-way-with-flat-areas-along-it-which-enable-wheelchair-users-to-rest/
of the community forum and help to spread your proposal
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
CoyKoi (2022-08-14 21:08:26+00:00): Large sign at the Onetangi Rd entrance to this road, stating it is private for resident's access only.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124870039
CoyKoi (2022-08-14 21:08:27+00:00): Large sign at the Onetangi Rd entrance to this road, stating it is private for resident's access only.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124870039
Frans S (2022-08-28 09:07:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. However, not squared. All your changesets which I reviewed have the same issue. Not squared buildings. The mappings are accurate but lacks the finishing touch. Squaring !

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124870511
snoozingnewt (2022-08-15 19:49:22+00:00): I'm pretty sure individual trees should not be mapped as forest
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2022-08-15 20:05:19+00:00): There are multiple trees not just one
TBKMrt (2022-08-14 00:31:25+00:00): related note: Nr. 3313152
Link: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3313152
TBKMrt (2022-11-20 11:01:08+00:00): construction related mapping changed with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129151778
ovruni (2022-08-14 00:56:42+00:00): Hola Carlos, en este conjunto de cambios se habían eliminado los cruces de peatones que conectaban a la plaza, los he recuperado.
Saludos
Warin61 (2022-08-15 23:55:02+00:00): Hi
The warning 'close node vertices' in this instance indicates 2 nodes exist where one node should be used. I have merged these to fix the issue.

Most buildings have square corners ... these are hard to draw exactly right... When the way is selected a press of the 'q' key will square them up .. makes the corners square and looks better.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-14 11:53:02+00:00): sidewalk=separate is even more precise than sidewalk=both. You should not use sidewalk=both when separate is set: separate means that the sidewalk(s) are drawned separately (sidewalk:left and sidealk:right are saying where are the sidewalks drawned). I will fix this.
alex846 (2022-08-17 16:56:49+00:00): Thanks for catching this, I'll try to check if there was a bug in StreetComplete that caused this quest to be available when it shouldn't have been.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-17 19:36:57+00:00): That is weird indeed. sidewalk=separate should be accepted alongside sidewalk:left=separate and sidewalk:right=separate or not.
map per (2022-08-17 11:11:48+00:00): Hallo Panda527,

dieser Fußballplatz ist schon als Fläche (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49531473) eingezeichnet und sollte deshalb nicht zusätzlich noch als Punkt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9951776256) eingetragen werden.

Deshalb würde ich vorschlagen den Punkt wieder zu Löschen.

Viele Grüße
map per
map per (2022-08-18 09:31:27+00:00): Wurde inzwischen von Strubbl korrigiert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125030798)
map per (2022-08-17 10:39:03+00:00): Hallo Panda527,

in OSM ist es üblich geschlossene Läden wie z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1325799754 nicht zu löschen, sondern als disused:shop zu kennzeichnen. Das hat den Vorteil, dass man später sehen kann das dort mal ein Geschäft war um später nachzushauen ob ein Nachfolger in die Räume eingezoen ist. (Das kann man aber wenn man neu bei OSM ist nicht wissen)

Hab den Laden als disused:shop eingetragen

Viele Grüße
map per
LockOnGuy (2022-08-15 20:37:43+00:00): If possible please keep edits local. That way you don't spam the history feed-globally.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-08-25 06:29:22+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
nevw (2022-08-14 03:27:10+00:00): Hi
This already mapped elsewhere.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6420175720#map=17/-27.67465/152.92068
Do we need your addition, if so, can you decide which is correct and leave just one of these.
BrizHutch (2022-08-14 03:32:49+00:00): The Promenade is bound by Summit Drive, Lakeside Drive, Waterside Drive and road 'The Promenade'. My location is more central. Will delete this and move the old one.
DUGA (2022-09-18 20:29:16+00:00): This is a graveyard.
map per (2022-08-17 10:05:03+00:00): Hallo Panda527,

bei diesem Hostel würde ich eher "Hostel Ozz" als Namen verwenden und "HappyCulture" als operator [0] angeben, ist aber nur eine Kleinigkeit

Viele Grüße
map per

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:operator
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-01 00:21:36+00:00): uno no debe mapear como en algún proyecto, sino como los caminos se encuentran en la realidad.
Victor Aaron (2023-01-02 12:50:45+00:00): Buen día, así esta en físico y así mismo se encuentra en la lotificación y urbanización del predio.
Victor Aaron (2023-01-02 12:55:30+00:00): Yo edite todo el predio de villa universitaria en opendstreetMap excelente día.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-02 13:14:37+00:00): No, no es así físicamente, puedes ver en las imágenes que muchos caminos que agregaste en esta área están fuera de donde deberían estar y antes de editarlos estaban bien.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-02 13:15:01+00:00): No hablo solo de esta ruta, sino de otras anteriores.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-02 15:03:19+00:00): área revisada
JJIglesias (2022-08-14 23:11:31+00:00): Saludos.

Al crear edificaciones se requiere q las escuadres (Ortogonalices) para eso se marca la figura y se toca la letra Q, o con el click derecho del Mouse tocas la figurita q muestra un cuadrado.

Por favor visita https://learnosm.org y https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-08-14 23:11:19+00:00): Saludos.

Al crear edificaciones se requiere q las escuadres (Ortogonalices) para eso se marca la figura y se toca la letra Q, o con el click derecho del Mouse tocas la figurita q muestra un cuadrado.

Por favor visita https://learnosm.org y https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

Gracias
JJ
JJIglesias (2022-08-14 23:11:04+00:00): Saludos.

Al crear edificaciones se requiere q las escuadres (Ortogonalices) para eso se marca la figura y se toca la letra Q, o con el click derecho del Mouse tocas la figurita q muestra un cuadrado.

Por favor visita https://learnosm.org y https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

Gracias
JJ
sorcrosc (2022-08-14 02:15:42+00:00): also used note #3286102 and Mapillary as source
map per (2022-08-17 10:42:30+00:00): Hallo Panda527,

covered=no und indoor=no muss man eigentlich nicht extra eintragen, weil die Werte standardmäßig implizit angenommen werden.

Viele Grüße
map per
Glassman (2022-08-17 02:36:51+00:00): Not sure why you removed the parking_aisle tag. They look like parking aisles, with parking on one or both sides of the way. 

Can you review your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124872333
Raendrop (2022-08-17 18:49:01+00:00): Hi, thanks for asking! Using the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle), not all roads within a parking lot are parking aisles. 

For the, "...perimeter of the parking lot, connecting multiple parking aisles – use highway=service without service=* instead. There may be parking spaces on either side, but the roadway's primary purpose is to get drivers to another part of the parking lot."

You'll see I removed the service=parking_aisle from specific roads where the main purpose is a feeder road or the entrance/exit into the parking lot (example: way 249321235 and way 544266970). 

I'll be returning to these features to add the more specific parking:lane tags on the feeder service roads that have parking along them (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane)
Glassman (2022-08-17 20:16:27+00:00): Thanks for the info and glad to see that you read the wiki.
map per (2022-08-17 10:19:40+00:00): Hallo Panda 527,

diese Fläche (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6346292) ist kein Basketballplatz. Nur die kleine Fläche im inneren (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191422847) ist einer, habs korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
map per
map per (2022-08-17 10:13:33+00:00): Hallo Panda527,

covered=no, foot=yes, motor_vehicle=no sind eigentlich Standardwerte, die bei einem Fußweg implizit angenommen werden und eigentlich nicht umbedingt extra angegeben werden müssen. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14327963)

Viele Grüße
map per
snoozingnewt (2022-08-14 03:43:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
map per (2022-08-17 09:56:25+00:00): Hallo Panda 527,

wilkommen bei OpenStreetMaps.

Diese Fläche (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6942476) Ist keine Schule, sondern ein Wohngebiet, habs korrigiert. 
Maria-Theresia-Gymnasium war eigentlich schon als Schule eingezeichnet.

Viele Grüße
map per
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2023-01-18 18:38:12+00:00): How can a caravan site have caravans=no ?

On the aerial images there can be seen man caravans.
gmbo (2023-01-19 07:30:56+00:00): In Deuschland ist auf fast allen Wohnmobilstellplatzen das Parken von Caravans verboten. Es gibt nur wenige Ausnahmen.
Alle Wohnmobilstellplatze tragen hier das Schild 
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Zusatzzeichen_1048-17_-_nur_Wohnmobile,_StVO_1992.svg

Wohnwagen dürfen nur auf Campingplätzen parken.

In Germany, the parking of caravans is prohibited on almost all RV parks. There are only a few exceptions.
All RV parks here carry the sign 
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Zusatzzeichen_1048-17_-_nur_Wohnmobile,_StVO_1992.svg

Caravans are only allowed to park on campsites.

Das Wohnwagenzeichen für caravan_site ist meiner Meinung nach falsch und es wäre gut wenn es durch das Wohnmobilzeichen von den Renderern ersetzt würde.

The caravan sign for caravan_site is wrong in my opinion and it would be good if it was replaced by the RV sign from the renderers.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dcaravan_site#Rendering
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-12 13:23:43+00:00): Dear Behzad Nik Fal
Hope you feel good
At the intersection of Malik Ashtar and Velayat Square, you have recorded a roundabout that does not exist on the ground, and no separate road has been created for it with a table or New Jersey.
I will delete it.
ChehrehBargi (2024-02-12 13:26:13+00:00): آقای نیک فال عزیز
امیدوارم حالتان خوب باشد
در تقاطع مالک اشتر و میدان ولایت دوربرگردانی ثبت کرده اید که در روی زمین وجود ندارد و با جدول یا نیوجرسی راه مجزا برای آن ایجاد نشده.
آن را حذف میکنم.
ضمنا از شما دعوت میکنم برای ثبت فایل های gpx برای ثبت مسیرهای اتوبوس خط واحد. برای شروع مسیر نیایش بازار را طبق قوانین ثبت کرده ام.
پاینده و سلامت باشید
user_5359 (2022-08-17 08:11:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9952012775.
What is the meaning of the tags
name:en = 石桥镇 (I don't believe this is an english name)
nameen = Shiqiao
?
ovruni (2022-08-14 04:51:32+00:00): Hola Carlos, en este conjunto de cambios, de manera similar al conjunto de cambios 124870943, se han eliminado vías de cruces de peatones, por lo que he revertido el conjunto de cambios. Para cualquier duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, tenemos un canal de telegram de la comunidad en Perú https://t.me/osmpe 
Saludos
soycarlospozo (2022-08-14 04:57:52+00:00): Vi que revertiste mi edición por un “problema” con los cruceros peatonales. En cuanto a ello, me tomé la molestia de mirar como es que estaban demarcados en otra ciudades grandes como Barcelona, Madrid o NY, y por ello es que había agrandado el área de la plaza hasta los límites con las rutas y el crucero peatonal estaba marcado en la misma vía, por tanto, es redundante tener doblemente marcado dicho crucero (No se si me dejo entender) Además había hecho varias correcciones en la red de vías cercanas que también fueron revertidas. Espero puedas tomar en cuenta ello y revertir tu reversión. ¡Saludos!
map per (2022-08-17 10:49:31+00:00): Hallo Panda527,

Diese Sprunggrube (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9952013546) sollte nicht als Sandkasten (playground=sandpit) eingezeichnet werden. Laut OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:athletics%3Dlong_jump) sollte man 
leisure=pitch
sport=athletics
athletics=long_jump
surface=sand 
verwenden.

Habs NICHT selbst korrigiert.

Viele Grüße
map per
emersonveenstra (2022-08-29 18:56:18+00:00): Hi,

In https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833326511, you called the street "Russell Rd". Street names must not be abbreviated, would you mind fixing that? thanks!
emersonveenstra (2022-09-09 11:29:36+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125977931
4004 (2022-08-14 23:18:57+00:00): код Гродно - 152
redd (2023-01-15 13:16:32+00:00): Hallo mkroehnert,
es scheint als hättest du hier einem Vorfehler durch Urml aufgesessen. Bitte Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3313294 beachten.
Das Roccadion ist dort bereits richtig erfasst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653640622

Ich habe Urml bereits gebeten, dass wieder zu korrigeren.

Vielen Dank,
redd
ereinstein (2022-08-16 19:27:50+00:00): Die Korrektur von Kipp & Grünhoff zu Schmidst Rudersdorf ist zwar richtig, aber Kipp & Grünhoff existiert dort trotzdem. Ich konnte jedoch nicht ganz ausmachen, wo genau das Gelände/Gebäude vom Kipp & Grünhoff beginnt und endet.
pitfire (2022-08-17 05:03:18+00:00): Hallo  ereinstein,
ja, dein Einwand ist berechtigt. Hab jetzt die Gewerke in POIs verschoben.
Laut Website firmieren beide Frankenforster Str. 27. Genauere Standorte sollten vor Ort eruiert werden.
archie (2022-08-14 06:22:46+00:00): Tagging highway=path+bicycle is rather meaningless as highway=path allready consists of bicycle. Before making changes please read which highways have what values by default: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Sweden
Shudharson R (2022-10-26 04:41:31+00:00): Hi Bro. Good work on your edits. One litte suggestion, if you are adding Tamil name. Add it with Tamil name Tag.  Click the plus button near the Name typing box and then choose Tamil. 

Thank
BubbaJuice (2022-08-21 18:39:46+00:00): Greg, 
The way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1073977348 already had a tag which implies that it should be made into an `area:highway` way. The sidewalks were already mapped here. It was not supposed to be a sidewalk. Please do not do this again.
ivanbranco (2022-11-20 01:21:30+00:00): Hi horisyu,

seems like the name tag ended up as the layer=* value by mistake: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nXf
horisyu (2022-11-20 04:57:57+00:00): Fixed it now.
Thanks for letting us know about the mistake.
archie (2022-08-14 07:16:35+00:00): Thanks, this is very sensible, as swedish timetables state "NN station" as halts. This makes it possible to search for the "NN station"-value.
user_5359 (2022-08-17 08:19:02+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osmp.org/way/1011900197. Why did you need the three tags
parking_spaces⋮mapped⋮disabled = 3
parking_spaces⋮mapped⋮normal = 0
parking_spaces⋮mapped⋮total = 3
?
This values can be calculated.