piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2022-02-06 07:54:53+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on https://www.osm.org/relation/9532497/history. What is the meaning of the tag US:VA:Secondary = US:VA:Prince William?
mavl (2022-02-03 15:30:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
MxxCon (2022-02-02 04:22:36+00:00): This is not a swimming pool. This is aquarium..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116884236
lovelyfurball88 (2022-02-03 22:17:04+00:00): Fixed, thanks
user_5359 (2022-02-05 08:19:05+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag nazwa_obiektu_robocza = Nadleśnictwo ?
voltairovicz (2022-02-05 09:38:59+00:00): This tag was meant to be helpful during the process of adding defibrillator. (it is the name of the place where it is installed) This is unnecessary right now and can be deleted. I have forgotten to get rid of this tag.
user_5359 (2022-02-05 19:41:20+00:00): all four nodes are removed...
Mashin (2022-02-02 01:25:17+00:00): Hi and thanks for your edits. Just a question, why do you think it is necessary to remove "Woodstock Hill Historic District" and all the address points?
The Woodstock Academy (2022-02-05 00:41:50+00:00): Hi @Mashin, This area is not in the "Woodstock Hill Historic District", and the address points were incorrect. This campus has one physical address. Thanks, The Woodstock Academy.
Mashin (2022-02-05 01:58:49+00:00): Perfect thanks! Do you know by any chance where is that historic district located?
The Woodstock Academy (2022-02-08 23:49:01+00:00): 523 CT-169 is the Center for Woodstock History. That may be a good place to put the locator for it. 

Thanks, The Woodstock Academy
ottwiz (2022-02-02 09:46:30+00:00): Is that really Samantha Mackay Drive? because I see no information on the internet, Primary Care Plus says "124 Brookshire Lane" https://www.primarycarepluswv.com/
CountyRoads (2022-02-02 12:51:36+00:00): There are (2) signs in that area and one says Brookshire Lane and the other is Samantha Mackay Drive. When I back in that area I will double check to confirm but I don't recall the signs having arrows on them.
ottwiz (2022-02-02 12:54:41+00:00): Alright, thanks!
CountyRoads (2022-02-02 13:08:55+00:00): You're welcome sir. I wish there was a way to upload photos to confirm updates and clear up any confusion. Have a great day!
ottwiz (2022-02-02 13:10:24+00:00): I mean, you can upload images to imgur or any image hosting services, so that is not a big deal.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-01 20:44:51+00:00): Specifically this deals with these revert fails from the complex_revert:
cannot restore relation 5640784 to version 159 (put): 409 Conflict
cannot delete way 1023961261: 412 Precondition Failed
cannot delete way 1023961260: 412 Precondition Failed
cannot delete way 1023961262: 412 Precondition Failed
cannot delete node 9442424147: 412 Precondition Failed
cannot delete node 9442424139: 412 Precondition Failed
cannot delete node 9442424148: 412 Precondition Failed
mavl (2022-02-03 15:31:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
mavl (2022-02-03 15:31:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
ovruni (2022-02-10 23:54:00+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado un nodo en una calle, el cual solo contiene name, por lo que he retirado esta etiqueta.
Saludos
trigpoint (2025-10-29 13:20:51+00:00): Hello
I have removed this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/173926066

It was only ever a proposal yet you made no mention of this in the changeset description and tagged it as an active area causing issues for data users.

Adding planned stuff into OSM is controversial at best, especially when the idea is controversial in itself.

Cheers Phil
sykul (2025-10-31 13:37:49+00:00): Sorry about that. If I remember right, I didn't know at the time it wasn't going to go ahead. There were even boundary signs up.
trigpoint (2025-10-31 14:15:38+00:00): No problem.
But remember that any proposal is just that and should be taken with a large pinch of NaCl as there is a good chance it will not happen.

Cheers Phil
Tomas Straupis (2022-02-02 06:55:43+00:00): Gal galima nenešti į Vilnių „Tvarkos“, nes po visų tokių pakeitimų reikia mums eiti ir realiai tvarkyti duomenis (kurie iki tvarkymų jau būna sutvarkyti). Vilniuje mes prižiūrim, kad duomenys būtų maksimaliai tvarkingi - tvarkingos ir kruopščios, o ne bet kaip  sumestos geometrijos, topologijos taisyklės ir t.t. ir pan.
Kevo (2022-02-03 14:16:37+00:00): Dude, seriously.  This isn't a playground where you can just change things because you want to.  Please use opengeofiction.net/ to create your "future developments in the GTA" to your heart's content.

Your edits consistently break aspects of the map and then the rest of us need to clean up your mess.  If you continue, please follow the rules and start off small instead of trying to edit major things.
Glassman (2022-02-03 17:30:24+00:00): #TIP: OSM spells out street names. The reason is that  software has a hard time unabbreviating. Can you review your  edit and expand the street address? I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116885649
quantumstate (2022-02-01 21:49:52+00:00): Hi, I saw you changed this section of path to a cycleway.  On the ground at either end the paint directs you to rejoin the road if you are cycling though I don't think there is anything that says it isn't a shared used path explicitly.  I had changed this to a footway since it seems to be expected that cyclists join the road here.  The old paint markings partway up which are getting pretty faded do add confusion though.
JWandel (2022-02-01 22:37:58+00:00): Hi there, the C14 is via the road however the C4 is via the shared path. There are signs which detail this but yes, the paint on the ground is fading. That bit of road is quite dangerous at the start and end of St. John's School day so I wouldn't want it forgotten that this is a shared path that cyclists are permitted to use, much as it is preferable for them to use the road when it is safe to do so.
eggie (2022-02-01 21:48:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Wanneer het de bedoeling is dat hulpdiensten hier mogen rijden kun je beter emergency=yes taggen.
Bovendien zul je die uitzonderingen voor de brandweer moeten toevoegen vanaf de kruising waar je nog regulier mag rijden. 



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Joris_VGGM (2022-05-04 19:04:00+00:00): Dank voor de info! :)
btwhite92 (2022-02-02 03:30:50+00:00): The 'motorway' tagging here terminates at regulatory 'Begin Freeway' and 'End Freeway' signage. This is unique to California and has been discussed with other CA mappers as an on-the-ground way to tag motorway beginnings and endings (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California/Freeway_ends). Please revert these changes back to the posted beginnings and endings.
Bradley
btwhite92 (2022-02-02 03:24:02+00:00): Hey Joseph,
It isn't settled that CA 299 east of Redding should be tagged as 'trunk' per discussion on #local-california channel of OSM Slack - if it were to be promoted, it would be in service of a Redding <-> Boise route, but would involve roads that have such low traffic & "importance" (per feedback from Oregon mappers) that it's debatable whether this should be consider a 'trunk' routing at all. If the goal is to orthogonalize roadway construction standards from importance this short segment should probably remain 'primary' with 'expressway=yes' for the time being, especially in light of contentious discussions in this area recently.
Bradley
user_5359 (2022-02-02 20:00:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026840321. You add a email for the value of the key website. Please use the key email.
RicoElectrico (2022-02-02 12:24:23+00:00): Cześć, wypadałoby jeszcze dodać miejscowość do adresu.
Sirtel (2022-02-02 14:29:28+00:00): Witaj, przepraszam masz rację.
aceman444 (2022-05-28 15:52:50+00:00): Zdravim, preco je ta severovychodna cast Majerskej ulice len 'track'? Nemaju tam chodit navstevnici zberneho dvora?
Jose Riha (2022-06-05 22:29:08+00:00): Chodit mozu, ale je to tam riadny tankodrom, takze si to podla mna nic lepsie ani nezasluzi.
aceman444 (2022-07-02 06:29:04+00:00): Myslim medzi Palffyho majerom a zbernym dvorom. Ak je zla cesta mali by sme to vyjadrit inymi znackami, ale dat to aspon ako service, ked to polna cesta nie je (a teda tam mozu ist bezne auta).
aceman444 (2024-04-28 10:42:17+00:00): Bol som tam a po zberny dvor je cesta dobra. Dalej je aj tak zabrana a je to urcene len pre bicykle.
A ked je to teda urcene aby tam ktokolvek jazdil, dam tam aspon service. 'track' co je lesna/polna cesta moze na Slovensku implikovat ze je tam zakaz vjazdu podla zakona.
aceman444 (2024-04-28 11:48:39+00:00): Inak sa zda, ze tu cestu po zberny dvor vylepsili, vyasfaltovali. PO zberny dvor je hladka a nie tankodrom. Takze asi sa situacia odvtedy zmenila.
FMBR (2022-02-02 14:58:26+00:00): Some of the roads are not correct, especifically the conection by the South between Muelle Costa and Muelle del Este
literan (2022-02-02 15:41:34+00:00): в чем причина удаления названия?
вот здесь я отвечал на вопрос в заметке анонима: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3025742

пока верну, т.к. обоснования удаления не было
dlazunin (2022-02-02 22:01:48+00:00): Аноним, собственно, это я и был, увидел на карте "Боровское шоссе" посреди парка и удивился.
В самом парке названия "Боровское шоссе" для этого участка я на нашел. По алее прошел где-то от моста через Раменку до хозблока. На участке от парка до улицы Удальцова Боровское шоссе не упоминается.
На схеме парка про Боровское шоссе тоже ничего.
На википедии написано, что когда-то там проходило Боровское шоссе.
В правках название появляется в name в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80939117, до этого это был old_name. На вопрос про источник данных о названии этого участка я ответа на получил.
literan (2022-02-03 13:58:00+00:00): спасибо за комментарий!

тогда я верну это название в old_name. На будущее, при удаление лучше хоть кратенько пишите обоснование в комментарий к правке
lapushkin (2022-02-03 23:03:30+00:00): Можно тогда ещё прописать old_name=Боровское шоссе дороге, которая идёт через жилую зону. Сейчас это, конечно, никакое не Боровское шоссе, просто дорога; адреса ближайших домов по Коштоянца и Лобачевского
Lahire99 (2022-02-01 21:48:56+00:00): Précision: Le square a été remplacé par un parking depuis quelques années.
oba510 (2022-02-02 02:03:53+00:00): Are you sure about all of these changes?  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1755584570/history for example doesn't appear to have anything to do with the brand you added.
Note Control (2022-02-02 12:59:23+00:00): Removed wrong wikidata. Added website + details. Added website and details POi around 4th street.
eggie (2022-02-02 06:42:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-02 06:49:16+00:00): Add road lanes
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116887218

Hier gaat de app al de fout in.. 
oneway:bicycle=no verdwijnt. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-02 06:47:58+00:00): Dag Puikstekend,
Tip.. In Add wether ther are cycleways zit een 'BUG'.  Die verwijdert helaas oneway:bicycle=no
Ik heb dat hersteld. 
Graag steeds checken of de uitzondering van tweewielers op oneway=yes niet verdwijnt.
MVG
eggie
DaveF (2022-02-03 15:42:26+00:00): Hi
There's no requirement to add highway tags to platforms. Their raison d'etre is to be walked on.
VA00 (2023-02-02 16:12:35+00:00): Nie kojarzysz, czy stąd da się przejechać do ul. Wysokiej? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9467226852
Adam_Piszczek (2023-02-02 22:08:25+00:00): Raczej nie,ale tam widać że może da się obok budynku chyba że teren prywatny,ale tam żle ta droga ul. Wysoka wyrysowana
NorthCrab (2023-02-03 03:36:28+00:00): Potwierdzam teren prywatny z granicy działek
nevw (2022-02-02 05:58:26+00:00): Have you considered that this may be tagged a clinic instead of a hospital. ‘Clinic’ forms part of the name. The healthcare section of the wiki is very extensive and mentions orthodontist practices.
nevw (2022-02-02 13:29:08+00:00): Another alternative …tag as amenity=doctors plus healthcare:speciality=orthodontics

Wiki description of clinics seems very varied
nevw (2022-02-15 08:13:37+00:00): no response, changed hospital to clinic for Orthoclinic Specialist Orthodontics practice.
Glassman (2022-02-03 17:34:26+00:00): #TIP: It's okay to tag the Thurston County School Property park and also leave the natural=wood tag. Both will render.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116888098
user4816003805 (2022-02-02 04:56:14+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for changing the outdated Ford GoBike stations in this changeset.
But, for these two flagpole nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7797674730/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7797674727/history
the "flag:wikidata" tag was changed to a generic US flag (https://wikidata.org/wiki/Q42537).
The names on these flags suggest they're specific flags: The Grand Union Flag (https://wikidata.org/wiki/Q2509336) and the Moltrie Flag (https://wikidata.org/wiki/Q6919069).
So these tags should probably be changed back.
Note Control (2022-02-02 10:28:19+00:00): Ok, thanks for the information. Already changed back to original Wikidata.
user4816003805 (2022-02-02 18:19:56+00:00): Thanks!
PolyDunami (2022-02-01 22:54:11+00:00): Way 5260089, previously named Ronald Drive, featured addresses naming it Periwinkle Lane instead. TIGER data seems to preserve it as Ronald Drive. With the addresses labeled as such, I've changed the road name to Periwinkle Lane while preserving Ronald Drive as an alternate name.
Diacritic (2022-02-02 07:12:18+00:00): Hey Leon,

This appears to be a descriptive name you've added to this drivethrough. It's not a street with that name gazetted. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions#Don.27t_describe_things_using_name_tag

I've removed it accordingly.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116888548
user_5359 (2022-02-02 06:14:19+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte beachte dass bei OSM die Beschreibung von Objekten die höchste Priorität hat. Objekte, die nur aus einem Namen bestehen, haben wenig Sinn. Als deutsche Einstiegsseite für die Frage „Wie beschreibe ich was?“ empfehle ich https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a (Vorsicht: Viele Information damit lange Ladezeiten)

Versuch einer Interpretation: Soll die 11b die Hausnummer sein? Zu einem existiert die bereits https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158331934 (korrekt notiert) und eine Hausnummer ist kein Name!
user_5359 (2022-02-02 06:36:17+00:00): Weiterer Hinweis: ein Hausblock kann auch mehrere Eingänge haben, dann löscht man die Adresse vom Block und trägt die Adresse bei den Knoten ein.
ggoertz (2022-02-02 07:11:59+00:00): Ich bin Neuling hier und weiß nicht, wie ich die Adresse löschen und bei den Knoten eintragen soll. Die WEG hat mehrere Adressen (an drei Straßen), aner nur eine ist bisher eingetragen worden (Am Saynschen Hof 27).
user_5359 (2022-02-02 07:19:57+00:00): Danke für Deine Ergänzungen. Ich habe inzwischen einige Änderungen vorgenommen (folge einfach den Links von Deinen geänderten Objekten). Auch das Modengeschäft, das am 4.12.2021 geschlossen hat, habe ich dort  (https://www.osm.org/changeset/116897534) angepasst.
Wenn Du Hilfe benötigst, kannst Du Dich gerne melden.

Noch viel Spaß mit OSM!
aweech (2022-02-08 01:42:41+00:00): Hi,
I see that in this changeset you deleted all of the turn lane information on Main Street. Is there as reason for that or was it an oversight?
Sytys (2022-02-08 04:24:15+00:00): Oversight, feel free to revert
Tomas Straupis (2022-02-04 07:21:31+00:00): Mes jau prieš 10 metų peržiūrėjom, suderinom su BP ir sutarėm, kaip žymėti. Ir viską jau susitvarkėme. Būtų gerai nieko nieko nieko nekeisti Vilniuje, bent jau nepasitarus.
PovilasDew (2022-02-04 12:22:39+00:00): Ok, kol kas šios srities neliesiu.

Beje, sorry dėl multipoligonų taisyklių nesilaikymo. Kartais užvaldo elementarus tingumas atskirti didelius poligonus į skirtingus relationships :D Tai ir lieka klaidos. Stengsiuos atsižvelgti į pastabas.
reedyn (2022-02-02 06:41:28+00:00): 👍
Lemmings75 (2022-02-02 09:28:26+00:00): Det stämmer
hvalentim (2022-02-12 09:13:30+00:00): Where available please consider using Ortophotos Litoral over Bing for the alignment. The quality/precision is much better. Also JOSM is a more capable editor (if you want to use things like imagery offset).
hvalentim (2022-02-12 09:50:53+00:00): Also, you deleted the tag for Tremoçeira as shop=doityourself without adding a replacement.
hvalentim (2022-02-12 10:08:01+00:00): And you are drawing building parts as separate buildings. If you want to go on that level of detail you ought to consider using relations
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:building
aselvadeasfalto (2022-02-21 18:21:13+00:00): Hi hvalentim. I have to disagree on the quality of the imagery I used (Bing). For a large part of Lisbon's Metropolitan Area, Bing has the sharpest footage, ideal for micromapping (which is more justified in highly urbanized environments). Then it abruptly changes to older photography, notably worse. Also, the alignment seems concomitant with both Ortophotos Litoral and existing edits (ESRI, on the other hand...).
I'll correct Tremoceira's tag as soon as I can, and thank you for the tip on building relations.
Diacritic (2022-02-02 07:02:19+00:00): Hello,

It appears that you were trying to relocate the physiotherapist that was at this location; you've accidentally changed the address of the building where they presumably used to be.

I will correct it for you now, let me know if you have  any other questions or concerns.
marketing_gpg (2022-02-02 20:50:28+00:00): Hello, 

This physiotherapist has moved to 23 Playne Street in Frankston and is not operating at 1 Ferndale drive anymore. 

Cassie
Head of Marketing
Diacritic (2022-02-02 21:20:03+00:00): Thanks for confirming Cassie.

I have moved the node for the physiotherapist to their new address.

Dian
tekim (2022-02-03 16:56:48+00:00): What is your justification for changing Highway 287 to "primary" from "trunk"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116889859
tekim (2022-02-03 17:00:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Colorado/Highway_Classification
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116889859
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
tekim (2022-02-26 01:37:00+00:00): Excellent!  Thank you!
gscholz (2022-02-05 05:32:49+00:00): Hi Ernesto,
this cahngeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-78.34575&lat=21.37278&zoom=10&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116889899

Can you please fix this? Can you please also learn how to use multipolygons?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

As this changeset has no comment, can you please learn what this is about as well:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-05-08 07:02:09+00:00): Hi Ernesto, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
Glassman (2022-02-03 17:41:03+00:00): #TIP:  My guess is Hubert's Christmas tree farm should be tagged and landuse=orchard, crop=christmas_trees. 

Also landuse=forest implies that the trees are logged. If you don't know for sure, I just use natural=wood.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116890092
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:25:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
Falsernet (2022-02-02 00:51:16+00:00): There is literally nothing to say you can't go from Carnaby Place along the pathway, onto the cycleway, then across the crossing headed for Tankersley Grove. I am mapping the LEGAL extent of where you can cycle. Which is something I thought you cared a lot about
Falsernet (2022-02-02 00:49:29+00:00): You can legally cycle between the crossings.
Pete Owens (2022-02-02 01:24:33+00:00): not on the pavement. you cant. The only signed cycleways are N-S to connect Burtonwood Road. There is tactile paving on the pavement  to warn visually impaired people that they are approaching the crossing
Falsernet (2022-02-02 01:29:01+00:00): But only on outer sides of either crossing?
Pete Owens (2022-02-02 01:56:55+00:00): Indeed. The fact remains that the only function of that sort of tactile paving is to give a warning to visually impaired pedestrians. For cycling to be legal on the footway you need blue signs.

Tactile paving is so often deployed incorrectly, I'm not sure how much use it is for the visually impaired, but it has no significance for cyclists.
Falsernet (2022-02-02 01:59:35+00:00): What about painted bicycle symbols? They seem to suggest it's legal
Falsernet (2022-02-02 02:00:10+00:00): Not here in this instance, I'm just asking generally
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-18 20:18:00+00:00): Note that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026869104 is not marked as a shop right now
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-18 20:18:39+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3056778

(if confused what went wrong or how to fix, feel free to ask for help!)
Pete Owens (2022-02-02 20:10:53+00:00): Not unless the council was out this afternoon putting up signs it isn't
SomeoneElse (2022-02-04 00:14:24+00:00): Hello,
Clearly there's an edit war going on over https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/osm-deep-history/#/way/30765899 etc.
Perhaps you could _both_ post evidence of why you think it is a cycleway or not a cycleway - maybe photographs would help?
Best Regards,
Andy (from OSM's Data Working Group)