piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 21:33:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:43:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
streckenkundler (2017-11-06 11:48:05+00:00): trägst du das bei https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1075-countries-compare-2017-11-06 ein? Ist gerade erschienen. ...oder soll ich, daß es gefixt ist...

fragt Sven
streckenkundler (2017-11-06 15:58:40+00:00): ich hab mal fix by other gesetzt.

Danke für die schnelle Reaktion der Fehlerbeseitigung.

Sven
user_177389 (2017-11-06 22:14:58+00:00): Danke für's Eintragen. Fehler erkenne ich nach dem Download der täglichen Changes von der Geofabrik, zumindest für die mich interessierende Area, nur habe ich nicht immer die Zeit oder Möglichkeit nachzuschauen, ob "Countries-Compare" schon veröffentlicht ist, um das zeitnah nachzutragen.
user_5359 (2017-11-06 19:16:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: Any time will be written as 24/7.
mueschel (2017-11-07 09:53:45+00:00): Hi,
you invented many new tags in this changeset, like these: 
buildingpart=vertical passage
buildingpart:vertical passage=elevator
buildingpart:vertical passage:floor range=0 to 29

Please have a look to the wiki how indoor mapping is actually done:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging

Also, the 'name' tag should only contain the actual name of an object, not generic descriptions like "vertical elevator connector"
eggie (2017-11-06 08:18:40+00:00): You changed a doctors practise into a bus station with an other address. I  shall revert revert your edit.
What was your intention? Please respond.
eggie (2017-11-06 08:20:46+00:00): reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53547051
eggie (2017-11-06 08:24:06+00:00): MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
nevw (2017-11-06 13:16:27+00:00): Hi
just pointing out that the lines you deleted may have been address interpolation lines.
See here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses
(I didn't have a close look at at this though)
Leith Bade (2017-11-07 02:15:40+00:00): Sorry I thought they were powerlines.

How does one view the original data to check?
nevw (2017-11-07 02:30:49+00:00): You can view the changesets in the area here
http://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/?zoom=14&lat=-35.35101&lon=149.22735&layers=BTT

Then select the square that has the changeset and select the [A] for that changeset and you will go to this page
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=53547106
When you click or mouse-over the red lines and the two nodes at the right end you will see the tags used.
Using JOSM, I can revert the changeset if you like and then it will be back as it was earlier instead of drawing it all again.
Leith Bade (2017-11-07 18:58:15+00:00): Ah thats handy, yes it does look there was an address tag in it. Can you please revert it?
nevw (2017-11-08 00:07:37+00:00): Reverted Changeset: 53547106
user_5359 (2017-11-06 19:14:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
jeka p (2017-11-08 17:13:56+00:00): Hi! Why did you change access restrictions here?
1. hier it is clearly signed: "1: Fahrverbot (in beiden Richtungen)"
==> so it should be vehicle= and not access=(which prohibits access not only for vehicles, but also for people)
2. hier it is also clearly signed: "ausgenommen Anrainer u. landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr"
so both destination and agricultural. It means agricultucal vehicles can also pass through there.

BR,
Jeka
dgitto (2017-11-06 08:22:13+00:00): "terra e sassi" non è un valore riconosciuto valido per la key surface. Dovresti controllare un po' il wiki
dgitto (2017-11-06 08:19:57+00:00): Anche qui c'è una email che non si capisce cosa possa rappresentare. E "surface=terra" è sbagliato.
m_p_13 (2017-11-06 09:27:35+00:00): Thanks. :)
vam_002 (2019-04-23 03:01:11+00:00): "Hi  RiyadiWibowo,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
way 538691239 classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Track'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance."
chillly (2017-11-08 11:21:03+00:00): You MUST stop making these mechanical edits. These MUST be discussed before you make them. Revert this now
Hb- (2017-11-08 13:43:12+00:00): Hi chilly,
please recommend a place (URL) to discuss edits like this. I will apply to that forum/board/mailling list and present the changes there.
Hb- (2017-11-08 14:21:52+00:00): My edits were not "automated". 
For further discussion please see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53540902
smaprs (2017-11-10 10:54:47+00:00): The place for discussing large edits globally changing objects already mapped is the OSM international talk list, by email, here:  
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/
Polarbear (2018-03-21 20:00:15+00:00): Hier wurde dem bereits geschlossenen ehemaligen Kaufhausgebäude (w23970899) ein wheelchair=yes gegeben. Das verstehe ich nicht, worauf bezieht sich das? 
(Inzwischen ist das Haus Baustelle, entkernt und von Fassaden befreit.)
geri-oc (2018-04-17 17:18:27+00:00): Du hast hier vorhanden Gebäude gelöscht und deine Version aus dem Webatlas SN eingetragen, die nicht im geringsten mit den Tatsächlichkeiten vor Ort übereinstimmen.

Schade das du dich dann nicht einmal um Fehlermeldungen kümmerst - keep_right, OSMI, Osmose

Mache das doch dort wo du vor Ort bist:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=101&error=45131728&zoom=12&lat=51.18599&lon=14.03653&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C110%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C285%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C294%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C320%2C350%2C370%2C380%2C401%2C402%2C411%2C20%2C60%2C360&show_ign=0&show_tmpign=0
Nakaner (2017-11-06 21:31:56+00:00): Hallo,

nur für den Fall, dass du nochmal ein Backhaus eintragen möchtest: Die werden als building=bakehouse erfasst (und amenity=baking_oven als Punkt für den Ofen selbst). Backhäuser sind keine Bäckereien, weil sie der Selbstversorgung und nicht dem Verkauf dienen. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dbaking_oven

Viele Grüße

Michael
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:19:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
Аndrey (2017-11-06 08:46:45+00:00): Здесь со стороны замковой - кирпич(въезд только для сотрудников организации), но со стороны Троицкой - никаких запретов для движения. Может есть другой способ реализации?
4004 (2017-11-06 22:30:35+00:00): по хорошему, надо бы в гаи вопрос уточнить, а пока оставить как вы и сделали, с участком дороги.
и чего то рендер глючит с односторонней дорогой
4004 (2017-11-06 22:45:14+00:00): вспомнил еще, что раньше там вроде был шлагбаум и/или знак со стороны троицкой
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:18:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
eggie (2017-11-06 09:41:52+00:00): De bron  source=BAG hoort op het gebouw te blijven. Ze zijn immers geïmporteerd vanuit de BAG ..Basisadministratie Gebouwen en adressen. Voeg je de source weer toe? 
Graag reactie. Het verwijderen van de construction is uiteraard in orde.
migrocha (2017-11-06 09:44:19+00:00): I can see the building from the windows right now! The construction is over, the building is finished, people work there every day since a couple of weeks. That's my source.
eggie (2017-11-06 09:44:28+00:00): Het gebouw heet niet RABO bank. In principe taggen we de bedrijven op de adresnodes. 
The name of the building is not RABO bank. Please tag the company at the addressnode.
migrocha (2017-11-06 09:52:54+00:00): Do you want a picture?
eggie (2017-11-06 10:22:07+00:00): No .. Its okey .. but all the buildings are imported from the BAG. It's just the Original source.
eggie (2017-11-06 10:24:22+00:00): Thanks for the answers.. and enjoy mapping.
eggie (2017-11-06 09:39:20+00:00): Wat was er mis met de edit van het basketball -veld? Wat bedoel je met structure?
migrocha (2017-11-06 09:40:24+00:00): The basketball "baskets" were removed, now it's just a paved area where kids can play.
eggie (2017-11-06 10:18:42+00:00): oke.. clear
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:17:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
eggie (2017-11-06 09:37:09+00:00): Probeer concreet commentaar te geven. Please add comment your edits more precise. 
Please do not connect roads to landuse. Please respond
migrocha (2017-11-06 09:42:35+00:00): The paths were all f*cked up and I straightened them up. If I have to justify every little thing then maybe I don't stick around for long.
eggie (2017-11-06 10:16:43+00:00): De paden heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse. I disconnected the roads from the landuse.
Het ziet er verder netjes uit daar. De parkeerplaats heb ik van serviceroads voorzien ipv unclassified.
eggie (2017-11-06 10:20:16+00:00): Oke... I did also some fixes. :) It's oke there now.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:17:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
fantomas (2017-11-06 13:18:29+00:00): Hello. You added only "name" tag for this POI by this changeset. You should add special tag too to show a type of a POI (for example, shop, office, etc). Also this building has only "addr:housenumber" tag without "addr:street" tag. So this address is uncomplete.
eggie (2017-11-06 10:42:38+00:00): Not the right spot. I moved http://www.rakangthai.nl/ to nr 344 Beeklaan/ Corner Copernicusstr..
CB- (2017-11-06 09:25:15+00:00): Mauvaise orthographe :
Kernac'h => Kernat
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:16:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
BCNorwich (2017-11-07 11:02:06+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I looked at your recent additions to OSM and am sorry to say the most of them are already mapped. This has happened with a few new mappers around Malham, thus the features are duplicated and even triplicated.

I wonder if you could investigate and remedy this problem, Or if your are being tutored perhaps your tutor could instigate a remedy.


    Beck Farm cafe (538707951, v2)
    Beck Farm (118318406, v3)
    Burns Barn (260985133, v2)
    118303591, v3
    538709750, v1


Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2017-11-15 17:56:18+00:00): No response so I've attempted to remedy the problems. Most are deleted as being duplicate but keeping any useful tags.
kreuzschnabel (2017-11-08 07:38:22+00:00): Sehe gerade, dass die Umgehung fertig ist. Ist die „alte“ Straße durch Bargau immer noch L 1161, oder können wir die jetzt auf tertiary ohne ref=* downgraden?
JJIglesias (2017-11-06 18:18:45+00:00): Gracias por editar en #OSM_BO
Jul14n (2017-11-06 12:38:41+00:00): Anscheinend scheint die 743 immernoch nicht PTv2 konform zu sein.
Nakaner (2017-11-06 20:46:03+00:00): Hi minhvo1015,

welcome to OpenStreetMap. I am writing this message English because local mappers might read it if they look for recent local changeset discussions in their home area.

Unfortunately, the first message you receive contains bad news. I am currently reverting this changeset because I assume that it is either an accidential upload of non-public data or an attempt to import data which violated our Import Guidelines. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines Data which is uploaded to OSM must be properly tagged. Please read the German OSM tutorial (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf).

It is ok to use JOSM for non-public mapping because it is free software (free as in free speach). If you right-click on a entry in the layer list in the upper right corner, you can disable the ability to upload the content of the layer. In addition, you can enter an invalid or non-existing API URL in the JOSM preferences (you must enable the mode for experienced users aka "Expertenmodus").

You can set up your own OSM API, the source code is free software and available at https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website.

Best regards

Michael
Nakaner-repair (2017-11-06 21:15:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53565740 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 53550519 (autonomous car test field) which is either an accidential upload of someone who used JOSM for non-mapping purposes or an attempt to use OSM as free hoster for geospatial data.
az09 (2018-03-12 15:33:03+00:00): change on way 30414104 tag building -> voltage please
bxl-forever (2018-03-17 02:23:37+00:00): Hello,
When you find streets with the default 50 km/h rule, please do NOT type "50" in StreetComplete → use the "There is no sign" option instead.
This is because StreetComplete also populates the OSM database with information whether the speed regime comes from the default rule or from a road sign on the street itself.
bxl-forever (2018-10-21 12:46:06+00:00): Hello,
I am afraid I’ll have to revert all your changeset, because it contains too much incorrect data.
I am familiar with many of those streets and there are dozens of streets that had a 30 kph regime for many years (long before your November 2017 survey), which you tagged as 50 kph, or the other way around.
Did you really survey those streets?
Some advice here: Brussels municipalities tend to increase 30-kph zones gradually, and this implies that road signs indicating where it starts and end will very often not be visible from every street, because the zone spans a larger area.  This complicates surveying but it is essential to bear in mind when you wonder what the speed regime can be.
Benopit (2018-10-22 07:49:23+00:00): Hi bxl-forever,
To respond to your 1st comment, I was not aware of this rule. Thanks for correcting me. 

Fot your second comment, many of those are 50. The circle round the Square Ambiorix is 50 for example, counting for 1/2 the edits. Let me know whether I'm wrong. But I have never seen any 30km/h panel there for example.
Nakaner (2017-11-06 21:50:27+00:00): Hallo kamarc,

du hast mit diesem Änderungssatz eine Note von lwmsks20 gelöst. Hast du die Apotheke auch vor Ort in Augenschein genommen? Angesichts seiner Benutzerkontensperren ist in meinen Augen das angemessen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/lwsmsk20/blocks Eine andere Apotheken-Note in der Karlstraße (nahe Haltestelle Karlstor) war nämlich Quatsch.

Viele Grüße

Michael
kamarc (2017-11-07 15:16:31+00:00): Hallo Michael, ja ich war vor Ort, und kann somit bestätigen dass die Apotheke noch existiert.
JJIglesias (2017-11-06 17:20:45+00:00): Saludos. Esa POBLACION "COLONIA CHIHUAHUA" esta en esa posicion segun Registro del INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE ESTADISTICA (INE) y el INSTITUTO GEOGRAFICO MILITAR (IGM) de Bolivia. NO SE PUEDEN BORRAR POBLACIONES asi como asi sin CONSULTAR PRIMERO
Hjart (2017-11-06 11:49:21+00:00): Several duplicate hotels here + an atm suspiciously located in the middle of a lake
stev (2017-11-06 17:21:48+00:00): Looks bad to me too - can't find any reference to "Eagle and Beth's" in that location in London
Chris Fleming (2017-11-06 17:54:15+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding these Points of interest. One thing tol check for is that places aren't duplicates. Also I have a question about "Eagle and Beth's" what is this?
sly (2017-11-24 23:15:08+00:00): Bonjour,

Je pense que vous avez fait une erreur sur ce changeset en ajoutant leisure=nature_reserve

Le wiki dit : "a protected area of importance for wildlife, flora, fauna" : je comprend que c'est pour qualifier les réserves naturelles. Le parc des bauges n'a aucune règle de protection des plantes ou des annimaux.
Je retire donc le tag, si vous pensez que c'est justifié, vous pouvez le remettre et me donner votre point de vue.
Sylvain M (2017-12-04 22:29:57+00:00): Bonsoir,
Attention Julien : tu as ajouté "leisure=nature_reserve" sur de nombreux Parcs naturels régionaux en France : c'est pour moi aussi une erreur (même si cela a l'avantage pour les PNR de les rendre plus visibles).
Merci de corriger et/ou d'ouvrir un sujet sur la liste Francophone OSM ou sur le Forum.
Rainero (2017-11-07 20:24:24+00:00): Hallo Gregor,
du ergänzt fleißig wheelchair-Angaben in Zorneding. 
In der letzten Zeit bin ich häufiger durch Qualitätssicherungs-Tools auf die Edits aufmerksam geworden und habe sie korrigiert.
Vor allem sehe ich folgendes:
1) verdoppelte Punkte, hier z.B. die Gemeindebücherei sowie die Trattoria Limone im CS 53557920. Bitte ergänze die wheelchair-Angaben am existierenden Punkt und erzeuge keinen doppelten.
2) neue Punkte an falscher Stelle, hier der Norma in einem Wohnhaus in der Eglhartinger Straße statt viel weiter südlich in der Münchner Straße, wo er übrigens schon existiert. Das scheint eine Spezialität der Wheelmap-App zu sein, da es immer wieder vorkommt.
3) falsch geschriebene (Straßen-)Namen; bitte immer Straße mit "ß", große Anfangsbuchstaben.

Vielleicht kannst du zuhause am PC deine mit der App gemachten Edits mit einem richtigen Editor überprüfen? Zumindest 3) sollte auch mit der App zu verbessern sein, indem du vor dem Hochladen nochmal die Orthografie prüfst.

Für diesen und den anderen genannten Änderungssatz mache ich mich mal an die Überarbeitung.

Servus,
Rainer
Gregor Schlicksbier (2017-11-08 11:44:35+00:00): danke für den Hinweis
Gruß Gregor
Constable (2017-11-06 16:42:59+00:00): perché continui ad inserire la tua email tra i tag dei sentieri e spesso inserisci il tag access=no ?
Access=no significa che nessuno può accedere a quel sentiero e non mi sembra verosimile.
Inoltre, puoi benissimo rispondere qua, questo è un progetto portato avanti da una comunità, è normale trovarsi a discutere determinate modifiche, non devi sentirti preso di mira o altro, siamo tutti sulla stessa barca, l'importante è remare tutti nella stessa direzione.
Grazie, ciao
vam_002 (2019-04-23 05:52:07+00:00): Hi  RiyadiWibowo,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
"way 540100051
way 538740878
way 540320691
way 540320690
way 538740876
way 540344844"" classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance.
seichter (2017-11-07 08:50:34+00:00): Ein POI wurde an völlig falschem Ort und dazu noch doppelt eingetragen.
nepumuk-fs (2017-11-07 12:30:09+00:00): Dopplung entfernt. seichter hat Recht.
Weitere Dopplung [foodsharing Fairteiler Freiburg-Stühlinger] entfernt; diesee wurde jedoch nicht als Suchergebnis angezeigt.
Tiamate (2017-12-17 15:48:58+00:00): @Burgundernepumuk 
Warum von dir diese Straße (highway=residential) entfernt?
.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289573236/history.
.
Sie scheint noch da zu sein:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1240993
mueschel (2017-11-07 09:50:13+00:00): Hi,
in this changeset, you invented many new keys like
blockage=concrete
drain_type=culvert
multiple_channels=no
profile_closed=round

These are not documented in the wiki and hence can not be understood by other mappers or any software. Please check if you can find another, more appropriate tagging of these.

Jan
catonano (2017-11-06 12:26:39+00:00): Ok, I found the fragment that was not closed. Gonna correct it right now
Retired Account (2021-07-17 04:22:22+00:00): This changeset has broken a lot of bus routes, by incorrectly merging dual-lane roads into single dual-way route, in the process making bus route maintenance difficult due to the inability to use auto-route to sort the ways.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:53:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:12:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
GerdP (2017-11-07 07:42:03+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=grass. Maybe you meant highway=service + surface=grass here?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538751350
There is also an unclosed way with recycling_type=container
here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538751352
I think this also looks like a service road which should be connected to the other. Maybe you wanted to map an area with amenity=recycling + recycling_type=container somewhere nearby?
I've fixed a few other problems like duplicated or unconnected roads, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53573999 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53573975
Hope this help and happy mapping!
muralito (2017-11-16 13:23:06+00:00): Fixed the ficticious motorway and other details.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:11:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:10:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:09:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:08:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:07:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:06:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
ToeBeeFixit (2017-11-06 17:06:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53558604.
majkaz (2017-11-07 09:54:38+00:00): Hallo,
kannst Du bitte schreiben, was für Source hast du für diese Wege verwendet?
Soweit irgendwie erkennbar ist, handelt es sich dabei um Privatwege in irgendeinem Garten hinter Mauern. 
Mindestens fehlen dabei access und gate tags.

Zu den Sourcen: Luftaufnahmen von CUZK.cz oder mapy.cz sind nicht als source erlaubt, Bing ist in Tschechien als source nur bedingt geeignet.

Und noch allgemein: Könntest Du bitte zu changesets meinungvolle Kommentare schreiben (idealweise auf Englich für die tschechische Kommunity) und diese auch gleich vielleicht vergrößern? Du schickst massenweise winzige changesets in die Daten, und es wurde schon in der lokalen Kommunity als problematisch gemerkt.
fell3 (2017-11-07 10:51:07+00:00): Hallo, als Souce habe ich JOSM verwendet.
Der Weg ist da, erstmal habe ich ihn eingetragen, um die feinheiten, wie z.B. Privatweg, Schotter, Asphalt.... kümmere ich mich später. Englisch kann ich kein Wort!
Wo ist das Problem wenn ich nach wenigen Arbeitsschritten die Daten sichere anstelle alles erst am schluss.
Zum einen hatte ich dies früher immer erst am schluss gemacht, und beim hochladen ist Josm abgekackt und 6000 Arbeitsschritte waren im Arsch. Eigendlich sogar das doppelte, da ich alles nochmal machen musste. Zum zweiten, hat mir die OSM Gruppe in Zittau gesagt, dass es besser ist nach jeder Veränderung zu sichern. 

Viele Grüße aus der Oberlausitz
Karsten Schiller