piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-01-11 17:03:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
opendcc (2016-05-19 06:41:13+00:00): Hallo,

die Abfahrt zum MAC heißt wirklich Römerstraße?
chihchun (2016-05-19 07:20:11+00:00): 恭喜你成功新增第一筆修改，有任何編輯問題歡迎到社群中詢問

* OpenStreetMap台灣社團 - https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
* 郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
zarl (2016-08-05 14:37:04+00:00): Hallo schedlix, hier hast du ein landuse mit PLZ und anderen Informationen (Hausnummer) versehen, die in OSM Deutschlandweit nur einem Haus zugewiesen werden.

Die Landfläche erhält nicht zusätzlich zum darauf befindlichen Gebäude die gleichen Adressdaten noch einmal, bitte korrigiere das.

Ist diese Fläche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44902910 ein Weiler, oder ist das die Begrenzung eines Hofes, und heisst Hof bzw. Weiler "Rauhbühel"?

Bitte schau dir doch mal im wiki an, wie ein Bauernhof gemappt wird 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard

oder ob hier ein Weiler in Frage kommt
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dhamlet

Sehr hilfreich ist für Beginner auch diese Liste https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a mit alphabetisch sortierten Stichwörtern und jeweils einer Kurzableitung, wie etwas zu mappen ist.

Gruss,
Zarl
Ars-UA (2016-05-19 09:52:36+00:00): Сюда же вроде можно?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4d95Rfbh2LEMVRwZkVfcVlBVWc/view?usp=sharing
Tomas Straupis (2016-05-19 10:48:57+00:00): Du klausimai:
1. Degalinė labai keistoje vietoje. Ar tikrai ten galima atvažiuoti bet kam ir įsipilti kuro?
2. Benedico tikrai ten laukuose yra parduotuvė, kur bet kas gali atvažiuoti ir įsigyti gėrimų? Gal visgi ten gamykla? Ir adresas labai keistas. Trūksta namo numerio, gyvenvietės, ir gatvės „Lauko“ toje vietoje nėra.
kayle (2016-05-19 10:40:14+00:00): Zdravím, prosím o upresnenie, pretože číslo domu 16 už bolo pridané v tejto úprave https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39417997
Ďakujem
letihu (2016-10-21 10:01:18+00:00): Was soll
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419420034/history
darstellen?
ma-rt-in (2016-05-19 14:02:47+00:00): Nein der Hof Weidenhaag hat die Hausnummer 1 und ist keiner Straße zugeornet
Reguton (2016-05-19 14:56:15+00:00): Was meiner Aussage, dass die Telekom das Gelass als "Siedlung 0" bezeichnet ja nicht widerspricht. Wäre das etwas für einen alternativen Adress-Tag?
ma-rt-in (2016-05-23 11:28:25+00:00): Nunja an welche Alternative hast du gedacht?
martinst (2023-01-05 17:56:42+00:00): name=* ist nur für Eigennamen
highflyer74 (2016-05-20 15:17:40+00:00): Hello!

Please make sure to cleanup tags according to OSM tagging scheme (e.g. not using capital letters etc). Thank you!
highflyer74 (2016-05-20 14:32:51+00:00): Hello!

Please make sure to cleanup tags according to OSM tagging scheme (e.g. not using capital letters etc). Thank you!
martinst (2021-10-27 17:48:25+00:00): Wären die Wegnummern bei ref= nicht besser aufgehoben?
RafalR (2016-05-19 15:30:19+00:00): Adres jest do poprawki zgodnie ze schematem adresowania. Gratuluję pierwszej edycji i zapraszam do kolejnych.
Peter Vojtek (2016-05-19 10:19:52+00:00): bol som zvedavy komu sa podari ma predbehnut :)
freeExec (2016-05-22 20:17:57+00:00): Что за ересь?
bekreyev (2016-05-23 06:46:45+00:00): Почему ересь? Официально действующий паром:
http://www.rusbreg.ru/?q=contacts
freeExec (2016-05-23 06:53:57+00:00): Потому что это не паромная переправа в том виде, что обозначено, а подвоз себе клиентов и не более.
bekreyev (2016-05-23 06:56:35+00:00): Велосипедистам эта паромная переправа интересна, специально узнал что и как. Чем это не паромная переправа? Сошлись на что-нибудь, кроме своего личного мнения?
Hjart (2016-05-19 11:00:28+00:00): Please do not add foreign characters to local names. I am reverting this.
FTA (2016-06-03 02:48:09+00:00): Hi, this looks like it may be an automated import given the node placement in a parking garage as well as unusual tags. Can you provide some information about the data source? Did you survey this? Get it from a website? Happy Mapping, FTA
bronikkk (2016-05-19 10:56:15+00:00): Указал, вернее.
mavl (2019-01-11 17:03:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-11 17:03:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
R0bst3r (2016-05-19 20:45:38+00:00): Hi marek,
have you used the key flat intentionally or is it an error?
highflyer74 (2016-05-19 13:15:41+00:00): Hello there!

I noticed you added some new keys to the database like case:deadline=* etc. Although this is not forbidden, it is recommended to stick to the thousands of well established key=value combinations which can be found in the OSM documentation.

For internal planning data (like you added) it is even recommended to use that data only locally on your computer(s) but keep it out of the public database.

If you need help on that, check the OSM forum and get in touch with your friendly co-mappers!
Liron Schur (2016-05-19 14:41:43+00:00): Thanks @highflyer74 for your comments. I'd be certainly happy to only use standard key=value combinations, is there anything for this kind of work? I am doing this for a planning network, to allow people to visually view live planning applications. These values will be removed when they become irrelevant.
Also, can you suggest a way that I can have a map that highlights only entries containing a certain tag, or contain a certain keywork in the name? I want an interactive map that shows all the current planning applications. Thanks!
highflyer74 (2016-05-19 15:22:00+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply! As I am mainly mapping things and doing quite a bit of quality assurance, I am not that involved in the different ways to display data. I remember uMap (https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/) being mentioned in forums as an easy solution. With the Overpass Turbo (https://overpass-turbo.eu/) you can set up different (also quite complex) queries to display the data you need. When it comes to programming things Leaflet (http://leafletjs.com/) seems to be popular. If that does not help, try the UK OSM forum (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=5), and if there is no help there try the German one (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14).

I hope this is of help. If you don't need the data anymore, just keep in mind to remove it again latest by then.

All the best from across the Channel!
SK53 (2016-05-20 09:55:54+00:00): Yes please use something like umap. Unless the local planning application summary (reference & address) are explicitly provided by the council as open data they are not suitably licensed for OpenStreetMap. Even if they are such relatively ephemeral (and hard to check) data is something which we tend to avoid including in OSM. Another point is that as I dont believe Peckham is address complete there is a danger that non-open sources might be used to add data. FInally we dont use ALL CAPS in names, we dont include comments or the address in names either, there are perfectly sensible tags for these. By adding all this extra stuff it becomes much harder for people who want to use the data (for instance finding a Costa on Peckham High St) if there is lots of extraneous info in the name.
Liron Schur (2016-05-21 22:01:20+00:00): Thanks guys. uMap is awesome, produced a great map with it! (http://tinyurl.com/ppnmapv1). I've taken on board your comments, removed the CAPITALS and address from name, and cleaned up the 'notes' attribute. The planning application details are publicly available, and we are a citizen group making the data accessible to the public (and of course happy for others to update it). So thanks for your helpful comments!
geow (2016-06-15 21:40:37+00:00): Hallo gbcholgi, willkommen bei OSM und danke für deine ersten Beiträge!!  Du hast hier einige Pfade mit "name=nicht markiert" erfasst. 
In OSM wird für Objekte im Name-tag nur der tatsächliche offizielle/gebräuchliche Name verwendet, siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names Dagegen werden Eigenschaften mit entsprechenden tags erfasst. Ich möchte dich bitten, hier den name-tag zu entfernen und durch "description=nicht markiert" zu ersetzen. Die anderen tags ggf. ergänzen, wie trail_visibility=* width=* surface=* und sac_sacle=*, siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking
Besten Dank!
Nakaner (2016-06-16 08:06:55+00:00): Hallo gbcholgi,

was geow nicht erwähnt hat: Wanderwegmarkierungen erfassen wir nicht als name=* oder ref=* am Weg selbst, sondern verwenden dafür Routenrelationen. Die werden zwar nicht auf osm.org dargestellt, sind in den Daten vorhanden und spezielle Wanderkarten stellen diese dann dar.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:route

Für das Erstellen und Bearbeiten wird die Verwendung des JOSM-Editors empfohlen. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:JOSM

Viele Grüße

Michael
mavl (2019-01-11 17:03:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-11 17:03:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-05-19 15:34:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is this a restaurant? Please add an amenity=restaurant, too! Please see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drestaurant
Jonasgson (2016-05-19 13:28:44+00:00): Fel ändringsbeskrivning, hur ändrar man den?
Jonasgson (2016-05-19 13:28:59+00:00): Fel ändringsbeskrivning, hur ändrar man den?
alphensebezorger (2016-09-22 19:09:14+00:00): Hallo Jeroen Muris,

OSM Inspector klaagt hier over het het feit dat de Gaffelstraat twee keer dit punt bevat: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4195325733. Mag ik dat voor je oplossen, of kijk je er zelfs naar?
Groeten, Alphensebezoger.
Jeroen Muris (2016-09-22 19:15:56+00:00): Als jij het wil oplossen: prima! Anders kijk ik er waarschijnlijk volgende week even naar.

Lijkt iets waar ik bij het gebruik van Vespucci voor op moet passen...
alphensebezorger (2016-09-22 21:21:13+00:00): Ik heb het voor je opgelost (in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42360230)
highflyer74 (2016-05-20 15:03:23+00:00): Hello there!

Just curious, what is meant by "ingress" in this case https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419490495 ? So far this is the only key used in OSM. Any idea to tag it according to wiki?
highflyer74 (2016-05-26 16:33:12+00:00): Hello again!

The community does appreciate some communication as this is a collaborative project... No reply so far :-( 

The questionable entry was now fixed by another mapper.
naoliv (2017-07-18 20:46:44+00:00): Kewen, esses nomes de rua você copiou de onde?
Kewen (2017-07-31 12:52:45+00:00): Clientes me repassar que o nome da rua estava incorreto! Não copiei de lugar algum, você não está falando com novato amigo!
smaprs (2017-07-31 13:45:56+00:00): Olá Kewen, o problema é o seguinte:  

Infelizmente o que se vê é que seus clientes lhe repassaram dados copiados de outro site sem licença.  
  
Esta rua por exemplo: 
 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/316669724/history  
  
-No mapa da prefeitura que traz o nome real e oficial (em: http://www2.hortolandia.sp.gov.br/component/k2/item/4484-mapas-de-hortolandia)  
a rua se chama: "Travessa Maria S. Rocha".  
  
-No Bing e Here: "Travessa do Algo Dão" 
(escrito errado para "Algodão", um easter-egg).  
  
-No OSM foi colocado igual a Bing e Here: "Travessa do Algo Dão".  
Inclusive com o mesmo erro de grafia.  
  
Estes dados não podem ficar no OSM, pois trará problemas de copyright.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-09-24 20:24:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52338424 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some names copied from Google in Brazil
highflyer74 (2016-05-20 14:27:28+00:00): Hello!

I noticed you changed some address data to contact:postcode etc. This is wrong. The initial version was correct. contact:* is used for phone, website etc.

Happy mapping!
Luuuddooo (2016-05-20 16:56:55+00:00): This correspond to this way of mapping: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/House_numbers/Bremen_Schema#Motivation

It is the recomended way of doing in France (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_France/WikiProject_Base_Adresses_Nationale_Ouverte_%28BANO%29) when adresses are duplicated which was the case here (it was repported as an error by http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr)
highflyer74 (2016-05-21 08:28:52+00:00): Hello and thanks for your quick reply!

Then this seems to be a "french only" way of tagging things. The discussion about having duplicate adresses is still going on, and although I (and I guess all other mappers) would love to have a general consent on such a basic issue, there is no consent yet.

The first link you sent leads to a draft, which has not been voted on nor has it been approved in any way, as far as I can see. So I don't think this should be used in everyday tagging.

In my opinion it only makes sense to apply such a serious change in tagging worldwide and not only in one country. Do you know if there has been a discussion on that in any international mailing list or forum?
Luuuddooo (2016-05-21 10:09:34+00:00): OK thanks, I will stop doing this kind of modification then. Sorry I don't know I don't follow international mailing lists.
highflyer74 (2016-05-21 10:19:36+00:00): Maybe you can check on the French forum / mailinglists about the status of that idea. I just asked on the German forum to see if anybody knows anything there. Thank you for your answers anyway! I'll let you know what they say over here :-)
uvi (2016-12-24 12:29:49+00:00): Hallo , du hast vor einiger Zeit viel Arbeit in die Erfassung des FUSION-Festivalgeländes gesteckt. Bitte beachte doch mal diese Diskussion: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=623784#p623784 Es wäre doch schade, wenn aus den dort genannten Gründen eine Löschung erfolgt und die Daten verloren wären. Beste Grüße und ein Frohes Fest
Uwe
GinaroZ (2016-05-24 13:06:12+00:00): Hi, osmose flagged up a couple of things. I think Cheque Centre should be shop=money_lender (missing underscore) and Cash Brokers (spelled incorrectly) might be a pawnbrokers instead?
eric_ (2016-06-01 16:52:46+00:00): Hi, thanks to let us know about it. These POIs have just been updated.
pucherbe (2016-05-19 16:01:45+00:00): sorry, wrong info: added attribute leisure = nature_reserve
highflyer74 (2016-05-20 14:58:11+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

For example "Infra" and "Institución" are not valid OSM keys. Please keep in mind not to use capital letters.

All the best,

highflyer74
highflyer74 (2016-05-20 14:13:45+00:00): Hello!

Welcome to OSM! Please keep in mind not to use capital letters with standard keys / values. Also watch out for typos...

Happy mapping!
eggie (2017-09-19 21:34:20+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik. Alsnog welkom bij OSM. Ik stuur het je per PB
trigpoint (2016-05-19 18:52:22+00:00): Hi, are you sure about this?
You have just connected a towpath (way 327119715) to a bridge at level 1.
First sanity check is how would this work without disconnecting the horse from the boat?
Bing imagery fortunately answers this, the path is under the bridge, there is no connection. The fixme on the way confirms that the towpath is not necessarily accurate.
I am not sure why mapbox seem to want to fix things in areas where there are many local mappers and many more who have experience of the Midlands country, in cases like this a note is by far the best option.
Please revert this change, isolated bridges along canals is no an error.
ridixcr (2016-05-20 16:26:56+00:00): Hey there! 
I didn't realize about this path, thanks for reverting my changeset. I will take in account your suggestion, and also I will be careful next time.

Thanks for your feedback.
Something B (2018-03-12 00:08:09+00:00): Здравствуйте, Михаил!
Вы отметили на карте в maps.me гостевой дом. Там действительно принимают постояльцев? Спасибо.
С уважением,
 Something B.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-05-22 08:47:48+00:00): Zmiana idzie do wycofania.
SomeoneElse (2020-01-21 22:43:38+00:00): Hello swalmart,
I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap 7 months ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4195761406/history was added with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.
If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, from OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-02-05 19:26:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80605431 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google-sourced changes.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39430788 for more details.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-14 16:38:19+00:00): Está utilizando la etiqueta incorrecta, este tipo de etiqueta es highway=milestone. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4195736837
luiswoo (2016-05-19 21:43:07+00:00): «Так толсто, что даже тонко»
Река «Днепр» по-русски теперь тоже «Днипро»?
gileri (2016-05-21 21:56:28+00:00): Bonjour,

Un tag spécifique existe pour préciser si un abri est disponible : shelter=yes|no, ça permet de décharger le tag description et que les données soient exploitables.

De plus, le tag source devrait suffire, ce n'est à mon avis pas nécessaire de dupliquer la source dans le tag note.
Blueberry (2016-05-22 14:40:21+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai taggé selon le schéma du wiki (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtaxi) mais on peut surement effectivement ajouter le champ "shelter". Par contre, j'ai laissé "openning_hours" au lieu de "presence" qui me semble ambigu (je ne suis pas sûr que des taxi soient présents 24/7 à ces endroits)
gileri (2020-03-22 09:43:47+00:00): J'ai retiré le tag note : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82478141
Andrea Musuruane (2016-05-20 10:39:37+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Il sentiero D1 che hai tracciato passa su altri tratti di strade esistenti. In questi casi bisogna usare una relazione e inserirci tutti i tratti del sentiero stesso.
arox5 (2016-05-21 12:47:02+00:00): Ciao, non ho ben capito come usare la relazione, però ho tolto le sovrapposizioni del sentiero D1 con altre strade già presenti. Cosi dovrebbe andare bene lo stesso? Grazie!
Andrea Musuruane (2016-05-22 12:51:01+00:00): Ciao, ho aggiunto la seguente relazione: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6244630
Ho inserito anche i tratti di sentiero che partivano da Biella e collegato i tratti mancanti. Prova a dare un'occhiata che sia tutto a posto.
arox5 (2016-05-23 18:47:23+00:00): Ciao, con la relazione che hai creato hai collegato tutti i vari tratti del sentiero D1 che collega Biella ad Oropa. Il risultato mi sembra ottimo! Ho visto che ora di fianco al sentiero non compare il testo D1, c'è modo di aggiungerlo oppure causerebbe solo confusione dato che collega tratti diversi anche di asfalto? Per l'aggiunta della relazione hai usato l'editor "Potlatch"? Grazie per i chiarimenti!
Andrea Musuruane (2017-01-16 14:20:04+00:00): Ciao, mi sono accorto solo ora che non ti avevo risposto. Per vedere il sentiero devi usare una mappa più specifica, come questa: https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=13!45.5975!8.0513. Per l'aggiunta delle relazioni ho usato JOSM.
Hjart (2016-05-19 20:58:04+00:00): Pas på med at tegne efter Bing, da det f.eks. i dette område er tydeligt forældet.
Peter Dobratz (2016-05-21 21:33:24+00:00): We don't put cycleways as separate objects if there is no physical separation (such as a bicycle lane that is painted on a road surface).
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
In general, in OSM, we don't separate out lanes of a road if there is no traffic islands or other physical separators.
Note that in Portland on Southeast Division Street, appropriate cycleway tags already exist on the road, so these separate Ways with highway=cycleway should not be here.
Peter Dobratz (2016-06-22 23:03:09+00:00): I've deleted the separate Ways with highway=cycleway along the road which already had cycleway=lane.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40216398
Bonix-Mapper (2017-01-01 23:47:16+00:00): ClémentVialle,
Aviso que removerei a restrição de roteamento entre a Avenida Salim Farah Maluf e Avenida Celso Garcia. Os carros não são roteados através de vias para bicicletas ou pedestres.
Bonix-Mapper (2017-01-02 00:03:54+00:00): ClémentVialle,
Removi a via ligando a saída do cemitério da Quarta Parada e as vias Local e Principal da Avenida Salim Farah Maluf. Embora a via exista na imagem do Bing ela não existe mais nas imagens atualizadas. Você pode comprovar nas imagens que fiz para o Mapillary no trecho.
ClémentVialle (2017-01-05 22:58:04+00:00): Ola Bonix, tudo bem, entendo.
mapper999 (2016-05-21 08:37:48+00:00): Please have a look in keepright for this area. There are a lot of unconnected ways and other errors.
http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=94&zoom=17&lat=49.29807&lon=8.66814&layers=B0T&ch=0%2C30%2C40%2C50%2C70%2C90%2C100%2C120%2C130%2C150%2C160%2C180%2C191%2C192%2C193%2C194%2C195%2C196%2C197%2C198%2C201%2C202%2C203%2C204%2C205%2C206%2C207%2C208%2C210%2C220%2C231%2C232%2C270%2C281%2C282%2C283%2C284%2C291%2C292%2C293%2C311%2C312%2C313%2C350%2C380%2C411%2C412&show_ign=1&show_tmpign=1
ViriatoLusitano (2016-05-20 00:14:56+00:00): Thanks for the contribution!
Mateusz Konieczny (2016-06-21 06:06:35+00:00): Hej, zerknij na http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/600755 - coś tu się nie zgadza.
alexfriant (2016-05-19 20:16:48+00:00): I also moved the "Residential Area" polygon out of the roundabout intersection since that didn't make any sense. That whole polygon needs to be reviewed at some point.
Tar Balázs (2016-05-20 17:09:09+00:00): Térinformatika <HSQGJ1>
highflyer74 (2016-05-20 06:30:17+00:00): Moin Berti!

Willkommen bei OSM! Ich habe gesehen, daß Du fleissig Gebäude hinzufügt hast, und möchte ein paar Tipps dazu loswerden.

Es ist sehr gut, daß Du mit JOSM arbeitest, denn der hilft Dir bei vielen Dingen, die bei iD (dem eingebauten Editor) einfach fehlen. Wenn Du ein Gebäude einzeichnest, kannst Du danach "q" drücken, damit die Form rechtwinklig wird. Es gibt auch ein Plugin mit dem Namen "BuildingsTools". Dieses erleichtert die Arbeit nocheinmal. Dann fiel mir noch auf, daß Du die Häuser meist als "house" deklarierst. Das ist schon einmal besser als das allgemeine "yes". Ich würde aber empfehlen, gleich die genaue Bezeichnung zu nehmen. Also "detached" für ein freistehendes EFH, "house" für Doppelhaushälften oder einzelne Reihenhäuser usw. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building). Bei Reihenhäusern, die nicht unterteilt sind (wo nur der Gesamtumriß eingezeichnet ist), nimmt man "terrace". Ach ja: das Plugin "terracer" ist hervorragend zum Unterteilen von Häusern geeignet. Man gibt einfach die Anzahl der Unterteilungen an, und bekommt gleichgroße geliefert.

Wenn Du noch Fragen hast, einfach melden!

Gruss aus HB!
matsumi (2016-05-22 21:01:06+00:00): И для кого так промышленные объекты разрисовываем?
LLlypuk82 (2016-05-23 10:37:39+00:00): Для спецподразделений вражеских государств с целью тотального уничтожения стратегической инфраструктуры, поскольку разведки этих стран-агрессоров более не имеют источников оперативной информации и пользуются исключительно данными OSM, внесёнными неизвестными им людьми.
matsumi (2016-05-23 20:00:05+00:00): Как сказано в описании проекта "OpenStreetMap создан сообществом картографов, которые добавляют и поддерживают данные о дорогах, тропах, кафе, вокзалах и многих других объектах по всему миру."
Т.е., это проект для путешественников, будь-то туристы или командировочные. И для этих целей совершенно не обязательно стараться указывать водопроводы, газопроводы, линии электропередач, места расположения генераторов и т.п.
Впрочем, Вам виднее. У меня вопросв больше нет.