piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-09-01 08:15:28+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator  as requested. 
The quantity of your mappings is to little to judge your mappings. 
This is a building only project. No need to map highways. When you do, like here, add a proper tag to it.  like highway=unclassified
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90213376
geomap6 (2021-03-24 08:23:30+00:00): Hi,
I can't see that there are other segments of Redwood Creek Trail intersecting with Emerald Ridge Trail.
I have excluded it so it may be a misleading trail in this area.

Please, let me know how you have added it? and in which mapping sources? so I couldn't see it on USGS topo maps.

Thanks,
valhikes (2021-03-24 17:26:09+00:00): I'm having trouble figuring out exactly which edit this is referring to. I was sent a map with my backpacking permit that shows Redwood Creek Trail to extend between Tall Trees Grove and Emerald Ridge. I walked it and found it to be somewhat different from what is shown on that map, but the gist is the same since it is frequent fords between gravel bars and some trail beside trees. The exact fords and gravel bars will change yearly anyway.

USGS in this area is extremely old. This part of the trail is covered by two quads, one of which doesn't even know there's a National Park there. So, no, you don't see the trails the park has built on there either. I used personal research. My GPS track is public, but it includes excursions into the trees, so I also used my then recent memory of hiking the thing.

I did find the large number of logging roads that have been transferred from the 1960 era USGS map to be misleading when I hiked the horse trails on the west side of the creek. Some of them have been actively removed and others vanished quite cleanly on their own.
Matija Nalis (2023-02-26 16:08:03+00:00): This trail seems to have been deleted by @geomap6 in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101625624 before reading @valhikes explanation why it is real and shouldn't be deleted. Also, sadly, there doesn't seem to have been any followup on explanation. 
Further comments and request for restoration can be found at link to other changeset above.
user_5359 (2020-09-02 10:42:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org. 
On way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842887216#map=17/44.01652/-96.32530&layers=N I assume you forgot the key highway
Mike Raust (2020-10-09 11:17:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842887435 looks wrong
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2020-10-09 11:30:39+00:00): fixed, thanks
Herbert3 (2020-09-10 18:29:59+00:00): Hallo Toliman,
die von dir gemappte Stromleitung wurde vor etwa einem halben Jahr abgebaut, deshalb hatte ich sie auch entfernt. In den Luftbildern ist sie aber noch (wahrscheinlich lange Zeit) zu sehen.

Viele Grüße
Herbi
DD1GJ (2020-09-10 22:52:57+00:00): Hallo Herbi,

auf Luftbildern noch sichtbare abgebaute Objekte sollten daher nicht gelöscht, sondern mit Lebenszyklus-Präfixen versehen werden. Auf den Karten ist dann nichts mehr sichtbar, aber in den Editoren sind sie noch als Mahnung an Luftbild-Mapper vorhanden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Viele Grüße
Joachim
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-08-31 23:30:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 90206017, 90206081, 90206232, 90206412, 90206580, 90206736.
mueschel (2020-09-02 07:45:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
You added many tags that are not used by anybody else.
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please use only keys that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
Thanks!
Colin Smale (2020-09-01 08:18:45+00:00): Hi,
What's the rationale behind layer=-1 on a long stretch of the River Waveney? Normally this is used for z-ordering around bridges, tunnels etc. Did you intend to apply this just to a short section where it goes under a road?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65620327#map=15/52.4639/1.4667
GeoFens (2020-09-01 08:50:38+00:00): Resolved, thanks for highlighting issue - was intended to fix issue where small section of river goes under building (old water mill).
Regards
Frans S (2020-09-05 15:11:32+00:00): 
Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mapping should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Nakaner (2020-09-01 08:04:20+00:00): Hi,

could you please explain what how "tagfixed" the trees?

Please provide meaningful changeset comments when uploading your changesets, mind the Automated Edits Code of Conduct and avoid changeset bounding boxes spanning half the world. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct

Best regards

Michael
wikimax (2020-09-01 08:44:30+00:00): Hello Michael,
I was searching for nodes with the name "tree" and no other tags to change them in natural=tree after checking if this was the meaning by the editor. If I see that the genus is used for the name, I fix this. If I see that descriptions or notes are used in the name, I fix this.

In this changeset the comment may be misleading because I found some buildings with generic names "building" and "house" which I deleted as they are no names and were correctly tagged in the building key. Sorry for not mentioning this.

Best wishes
wikimax
Glassman (2020-09-01 02:42:08+00:00): You might also be interested in https://spot-the-box.us/ - Not associated with OSM, but the developers are all OSM mappers.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90214344
ke9tv (2021-06-09 19:35:57+00:00): Thanks for doing these. I had placed a note at Switzkill Farm because I knew the stuff was there.  I'm a little surprised that the Long Path doesn't use the trails - it would be nothing to open a few hundred feet of trail along the old stone wall into Cole Hill. That would cut off about a mile of roadwalk.
user_5359 (2020-09-02 10:40:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! the key opening_hours is not for marking the starting times of individual courses, but to note the general accessibility for the customer. As there are also other addresses in the building, I have moved the information to the  point https://www.osm.org/node/7867992508
The Frenchman (2020-09-01 04:21:47+00:00): Thank you for doing that!
HansWürstchen (2020-09-01 04:40:18+00:00): Hallo Hb-,
dann erkläre doch bitte mal wo Du die falschen Daten her hast, abgelaufen bist den Weg seit gestern Abend ja sicherlich nicht.
Dann wüßtest Du das der Weg im Ilsenburger Schlosspark über mehrere Roten ausgeschildert ist, so wie es vorher erfasst war. Und auch im Bereich der Teufelsmauer Blankenburg-Timmenrode ist er wieder über den, zuletzt gesperrten Südhangweg geführt, der andere Weg ist nicht mehr ausgeschildert. Sich vor Ort selbst ein Bild zu machen ist oftmals sinnvoller als die nötigen Daten aus fragwürdigen Quellen zu kopieren!
Mit freundlichen Grüßen.
Hb- (2020-09-01 05:45:27+00:00): Wie in der Quellenbeschreibung aufgeführt, habe ich unter anderem meine Großmuttter befragt. Sie hat Teile des Weges vor einigen Jahren erwandert.

Falls mehrere Beschilderungsvarianten vorhanden sind, habe ich nur die auf der Webseite vom Tourismusverband hinterlegte Route genommen. 

Für den gesperrten Südhangweg wird wohl eine Umleitung vorhanden sein, die von Wanderern begangen werden kann. Da sehe ich keinen Grund, die OSM-Relation zu durchlöchern. Falls gewünscht, kannst Du die Umleitungsstrecke gerne nachtragen und sie per desccription hinterlegen.

Siehe auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90157415
HansWürstchen (2020-09-01 11:05:48+00:00): Hallo Hb-, 
und selbst warst Du nicht vor Ort, wie schon geschrieben.

Und warum löscht Du die Alternativrouten dann wenn sie schon erfasst sind, ich hab Dir bereits neulich geschrieben, das die Route die der Betreiber angibt nicht mit der Situation vor Ort übereinstimmt!

Wie auch schon geschrieben, der Südhangweg ist NICHT! mehr gesperrt, Du hast die Route über die Umleitungsstrecke gelegt, die nicht mehr aktiv ist! Und das ist sicher, ich war am We erst vor Ort und hab im Anschluss die Route auf den Urspünglichen Weg verlegt, zumal ich sie selbst vor nem Jahr auf die Umleitungsstrecke gelegt habe, da der Südhangweg den Eindruck einer dauerhaften Sperrung vermittelt hat, die Route war jedoch in dem Bereich noch nicht erfasst.

Danke das Du die Relation vervollständigt und bereinigt hast, es ist jedoch unvorteilhaft, Daten die Mapper vor Ort mühevoll zusammengetragen haben zu ignorieren und zun löschen und das, scheinbar, ohne jemals selbst vor Ort gewesen zu sein!
MfG!
Hb- (2020-09-07 15:14:59+00:00): Wenn Alternativrouten dazu führen, dass die Relation vom Editor nicht mehr als durchgängig bestätigt werden kann, sollte ihre Erfassung unterbleiben.  Es ist recht einfach für Mapper, eine Relation dort zu reparieren, wo sie gerade tätig waren.  Dies setzt voraus, das die Relation vorher in Ordnung war. 

Es mag ja sein, dass dort im Klostergarten die Route auf mehreren Wegen ausgeschildert ist. Aber wem hilft das? Dem Betreiber? Dem Wanderer? Dem Routenverantwortlichen?

Das Daten - und damit die Arbeit anderer - gelöscht werden, ist bedauerlich und ich bitte dies zu entschuldigen.
rivermont (2020-09-03 19:53:08+00:00): Hi,  
Are you aware of the poor quality that comes with importing the MS building dataset? For example, the following buildings do not exist anymore  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842901556  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842901557  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/842716857

Some have the MS buildings source tags while others do not; if you are tracing from the Esri Clarity layer please be aware that it is from 2010 and much has changed.
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2020-09-03 21:28:56+00:00): Hey @rivermont, 
Thanks for your concerns, and the three ways you mentioned have been removed as they do not show up in the Bing imagery. I use the Bing imagery for tracing newer buildings and making sure the woods line up to the latest imagery, which is why not all MS buildings are used. For newer subdivisions the buildings, woods, etc, are all drawn up from scratch on JOSM as JOSM'S buildings tools allow me to make very high quality building footprints.
yadathot (2020-09-01 01:23:41+00:00): Added Service road as per Private Maxar imagery.
abakus_uploader (2020-09-01 22:32:09+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Ficky IRM-RV (2020-09-18 07:57:08+00:00): Hi peetha_la,
I modified this road (Way 842902658), change to tertiary and smoothing the geometry based on maxar premium.
Thank you.
Frans S (2020-09-08 14:44:11+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mappings should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here have a rectangular pattern. Please follow the outlines precisely and square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Korgi1 (2021-01-04 05:01:56+00:00): Wasn't it fine before?
GoodClover (2020-09-01 01:44:35+00:00): I've calmed down now, all is ok.
Time for some sleep I think.

I've come to realise osmcha will see the "d*mn" and report it as suspect_word, I aplolgize, this was just me joking about spending half a day to figure out I needed to add one node where the roof:ridge crosses the edge in-between the two building:part.
GoodClover (2020-09-01 01:45:55+00:00): I was doing the one building to make sure I got it right before doing the nearby ones in a similar detail.
yumean1119 (2020-09-13 04:20:33+00:00): はじめまして。岡山県を中心に活動しているyumean1119と申します。「精度の確保」などの精力的なマッピングに感謝いたします。

大変申し訳ありませんが、この変更セットで追加された道路について、バスの営業所内にhighway=primaryがあるなど、実態を反映していないと思われるものがあるので現地の知識に基づき削除させていただきました。

恐らく、RapiD(mapwithAI)によって提案された道路をそのまま登録したものと思われますが、
・種別が不自然
・既存の道路と接続していない
・建物と道路が交差
など、機械学習から抽出された道路をよく確認せずに追加すると問題が生じることがありますので、今後は注意していただけると嬉しいです。
tguen (2020-09-16 06:23:00+00:00): Why did you change the name tag on several sections of Highway 213 to addr:street?
tguen (2020-09-16 06:26:26+00:00): You also removed the names from the route relations. Your changeset message is not helpful. What exactly were you doing here?
Baloo Uriza (2020-09-16 13:21:24+00:00): names are not refs and don't qualify for the name tag.

https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/63501/highway-naming-conventions
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Baloo Uriza (2020-09-16 13:22:02+00:00): In this case I was working on making sure OR 213 had a complete, contiguous relation.
Reeniz (2020-09-06 18:34:14+00:00): Qué vas hacer con los nodos huerfanos y vias sin tags? Por qué no los eliminas?. Marcan demasiados errores.
Frans S (2020-09-02 10:02:13+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mapping are not that accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor
I Invalidate this task ( 1293) and ask you to improve and square your mappings

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
Fanny IRM-ED (2020-09-03 07:52:32+00:00): Hi, LHQUAN!

I want to ask you about this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/841115929). If you do not mind, why this road set to waterway=stream? I seem this way is like a road than a waterway.
Thank you in advanced
Frans S (2020-09-01 09:03:18+00:00): Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
I am sorry to say but your mapping work lacks accuracy and details.
Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
skyper (2020-09-02 10:10:06+00:00): Ground source missing in CS.

How about access restrictions?

Angles seem to be drawn carelessly and parallel ways are not parallel.

Reviewer?
contrai1 (2020-09-04 04:07:13+00:00): Thank you for checking into our edits and providing us with the valuable inputs. As mentioned in the changeset discussion 89966935.our team is working on adding a #tag to edits and soon will be implemented. always happy to learn from the community.
skyper (2020-09-04 11:02:28+00:00): Why did you not answer my question about access restrictions.

No personal word about the carelessly drawn angles.

Are you a human? Can you write in your own words?

How long will it take?
How am I informed about the progress?

Please, ask your chef if it is not wise, to stop all mapping action meanwhile, and tell me the answer

Just read the wiki and your own page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Amazon_Logistics

When are my questions answered?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Amazon_Logistics

Why did your instructor not tell you?

How about at least some own words or don`t you speak English?

Why do you break your own rules?
Why does neither your reviewer nor your instructor tell you to comply to the rules?
Please, ask them and tell me the answer.
contrai1 (2020-09-08 02:37:26+00:00): thanks for the response. apologies for the misaligned geometry. please find the changeset(90553312) for suggested modifications. i have not modified any access tags as there are not enough resources to validate it. going forward, i will be more precise about my changeset comments.  Our lead had initiated the discussion in the OSM forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=800092#p800092. Thanks for your valuable inputs.
contrai1 (2020-09-08 02:43:03+00:00): I have also changed the road angles in another changeset and hence I am posting the changeset separately. 
Please check the following changeset. 
Changeset: 90553387

Thanks for your valuable inputs.
Nate Wessel (2020-09-01 23:24:17+00:00): Looks like you got a bit ahead of actual construction here. I just rode Bloor and there is no lane yet between Indian Road and Sterling Road. I think the installation is delayed due to the construction around there taking up a full lane. Sewers or something.
Hack-o-lantern (2020-09-02 03:44:33+00:00): I actually noticed that when I rode that section on the weekend but forgot when I mapped it. Thanks for fixing it.
PeterPan99 (2021-01-01 09:41:36+00:00): Hi,  I notice that, in tis changeset, you have created a feature tagged "highway=footpath".  unfortunately, the documented tag for a footpath is "highway=footway" (odd, I know, but that is used over 13 million times, compared to less than 130 times for "highway=footpath").. Would you object, if I change all the instances I can find of "highway=footpath" to be "highway=footway"?  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
wlam2020 (2021-01-01 16:46:38+00:00): No objections. Thanks
rab (2020-09-01 14:35:38+00:00): landuse=farmyard in a industrial area?
Please reconsider your edit!
Frans S (2020-09-05 15:02:23+00:00): 
Hello. 

Thank you for mapping on this project.
Your mapping should be more accurate and lacks the finishing touch of squaring them

Most buildings here are rectangular. Please square each of them with the Q key in the editor

Here are some tips and hints which might be helpful to improve your mapping skills

https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT_4K-s7HItsGTDt4dx43C3iD7u5uHtUyvasd_eMUQIq9zWbwlMXQk90jDHcdq6OcOnMc6B1NHYG4cO/pub
Best regards and keep mapping
user_11166885 (2020-09-01 17:25:34+00:00): Allegami una fonte o faccio il revert.
user_6400648 (2020-09-01 17:59:32+00:00): non vedo un motivo
user_11166885 (2020-09-01 18:10:25+00:00): io invece si, visto che il sentiero non è classificato, bensì esiste solo scala/scalinata delle vacche!
SomeoneElse (2020-09-05 10:56:15+00:00): (in response to a private message received following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3878 , and also "non vedo un motivo" above)
OpenStreetMap is a shared map and a shared project.  We need to work together here.  It's not OK to react in the way that you have.  When https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3878 expires tomorrow please answer the questions that people have asked you at http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6400648 politely.
If you don't, you'll be blocked again from editing.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2020-09-05 10:56:36+00:00): (in risposta a un messaggio privato ricevuto seguendo https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3878, e anche "non vedo un motivo" sopra)
OpenStreetMap è una mappa condivisa e un progetto condiviso. Dobbiamo lavorare insieme qui. Non va bene reagire nel modo in cui hai fatto. Quando https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3878 scadrà domani, per favore rispondi alle domande che le persone ti hanno posto su http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=6400648 educatamente.
Se non lo fai, sarai nuovamente bloccato dalla modifica.
I migliori saluti,
Andy Townsend, a nome del gruppo di lavoro sui dati di OSM.
eggie (2020-09-01 13:03:46+00:00): Hi James.. Please don't change buildingshape. It's all import from the Dutch Kadaster.
Don't look at the roofshape. Its an aerial image!
I fix the building at the Landscheidingsstraat. 
Why a footwat layer=-1 ?
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90219601
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-01 13:05:34+00:00): Fixed also the building at the Dijkgraafstraat.
eggie (2020-09-01 13:08:25+00:00): Your upload comment is revspace  What do you mean?
Greetz,
Eggie
ralley (2020-09-01 08:42:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits.  A tip - since most houses in NZ consist mainly of 90 degree corners in the Id editor you can select the outline and right click and select "Square" to square the angles.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90220120
DaveF (2020-09-01 11:56:18+00:00): Hi
Could you refrain from duplicating tags (ref:crs) on relations which are already on ways & nodes. It only causes confusion & errors.

When detaching railway=station tags from railway lines could you move them instead of deleting & recreating anew. The edited history of data is very useful.

Unsure if you're adding them, but entities such as railway lines, ATMs. bike racks, bus stops, cafes etc aren't required. (Actually I think there's a fair argument stop areas & PTv2 isn't required at all. It's all just duplication & collections.)
ika-chan! UK-USA (2020-09-01 12:59:45+00:00): There is a case for stop_area relations: we already have these for Transport for London’s rail services, in addition to countless rail services worldwide.

I am also not sure if tag duplication is a major problem since I do not know of railway station codes changing frequently: the only thing that may change frequently is the operators, and I only went by what was specified in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dstop_area. When train franchises change names, we can always run it via Overpass Turbo.

However, I will be happy to try a different method that will keep existing station nodes. I should improve on that.
DP24PH (2020-09-01 04:51:17+00:00): ADDENDUM to changeset: Further cut of provincial bus routes to PITX only, based on existing OSM data, and may further subject to changes in the subsequent changeset.
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-09-12 17:04:21+00:00): Just to add up, if the provincial routes get reactivated sometime, I think they have far more limited stops north of Dasma to avoid competing with city buses.

Also, if the "extension" of Route 28 is just for buses headed back to garage (not carrying passengers), then that should be restored to end at Pala-pala.
DP24PH (2020-09-24 14:02:07+00:00): Additional information available: Route 28 for Dasmariñas could end by the bus companies' discretion whereas it ends at Pala-Pala for DSN/Jasper Jean, Don Gregorio for San Agustin, and Dasma/Silang Border (welcome arch) for E&A, regardless of passenger carrying status. Upon review of the Bus Route Rationalisation Map, it is not necessarily ending at Pala-Pala, hence it is by the discretionary practice. Likewise, all provincial buses are no longer allowed to enter the Downtown Dasmariñas (Bayan) in order to give way for the existing City Buses and Jeepneys.