piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2020-11-07 13:07:00+00:00): Hi,
the 'name' tags you added here are suspicious to me.
Most of the different languages are no names in these languages, but just the same name copied over and over again. The name:XX tags are just for objects that actually have a name in another language.

And, tags like 'name:alt_fr' don't exist. The correct key is 'alt_name:fr'.
sorbovit (2021-11-11 10:32:49+00:00): Czołem.
Drogi prowadzące do budynków nie mogą być oznaczone jako highway=track - stają się wtedy niewidoczne dla nawigacji. Nie ma tutaj znaczenia, że droga jest gruntowa, od tego jest tag surface=*. Wartości =track używamy dla dróg leśnych i polnych o ile nie prowadzą do zabudowań.
ElliottPlack (2021-09-01 18:11:29+00:00): Hi Marc, thanks for the updates along York Road here. I performed the previous edit (8 years ago) and realize that my use of highway=service was incorrect, according to the wiki. I will make the update to highway=residential per 

> Note: This is not a tag for frontage road, sometimes called a service road. That should be tagged depending on what function the frontage road serves.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
marc__marc (2024-08-30 10:17:44+00:00): thanks
Minh Nguyen (2021-07-17 22:52:20+00:00): This changeset somehow replaced the route relations for northbound and southbound U.S. Route 101 between Los Angeles and Hopland (71162 and 108619) with the members of a bus route relation, presumably for Golden Gate Transit. The relations were then deleted as tagging mistakes in changeset 98079317. The relations have been restored in changeset 108175328 and unrepurposed in changeset 108175438.
clay_c (2021-07-17 22:57:03+00:00): My bad! Thanks for taking the time to fix it.
Minh Nguyen (2021-07-18 01:06:19+00:00): Any idea which Golden Gate Transit bus route got conflated with U.S. 101? I’m afraid I’m not familiar enough with that system to know what the stops should correspond to.
clay_c (2021-07-18 01:13:41+00:00): I'm out in the mountains with limited internet access at the moment, so I'll check when I get home tomorrow. My first guess would be GGT route 101.
gpserror (2021-07-29 20:46:49+00:00): Spotted this issue http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4780282 while inspecting errors from another tool, marking as a dependency.  No U-turn restricion at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/55962287 was lost
clay_c (2021-07-30 15:11:33+00:00): Did a partial revert here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108898114 Please double-check and let me know if there are still issues.
gpserror (2021-07-30 21:18:46+00:00): Thanks, I fixed up the rest of relation 4780282 so good to go on my front!
Minh Nguyen (2022-05-23 07:36:09+00:00): This changeset did the same thing to the route relation for California State Route 1, which ended up getting deleted as a tagging error in changeset 98079414. Changeset 121350189 restored the relation and 121351794 reverted it to being a road route again.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-11-07 00:19:28+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 92653235.
Vinber (2020-11-07 05:08:49+00:00): be careful, your changeset is very very large !
Riemer17 (2020-11-08 15:49:43+00:00): Hoi Larshei,
Je hebt hier per ongeluk twee nodes van het wandelknooppuntennetwerk gemerged. Ik heb het nu eventjes gecorrigeerd. Als een node tags heeft ziet die er anders uit in iD. Als dat zo is kan je het beste even kijken wat voor tags die node dan heeft en of je die zo maar kan mergen met een andere node.

Mvg,
Riemer17
Warin61 (2020-11-08 00:50:09+00:00): Not a question of 'may have', there are crossing buildings. Crossing buildings are identified by the JOSM validator before you download the data to OSM. 
A better practice is to save the data to your local PC without downloading it to OSM. Then correct it later. Once corrected then download it to OSM.
Warin61 (2023-01-01 07:10:40+00:00): These are still here .. 2 years later... deleting them? 

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=116.00740&lat=-31.97778&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
woodpeck_repair (2024-04-30 22:11:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 150728692 where the changeset comment is: delete fake beaches
Supaplex (2020-11-07 07:46:09+00:00): 地下47層？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93690545
Dimacn (2020-11-08 06:26:40+00:00): Вы некорректно отметили объект как парк отдыха. В понимании OSM, стадион - это стадион с трибунами. В данном случае это, скорее всего, спортивная площадка. Пожалуйста исправьте.
ElliottPlack (2021-02-06 04:30:15+00:00): Hey there. Did you mean to add amenity = fuel for this line that makes up one of the city boundaries? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41008778 Figured it was a mistake. Thanks!
TheDutchMan13 (2021-02-06 05:20:21+00:00): Oh yeah, that's definitely a mistake. Thanks for catching that.
Ser9ei (2021-03-22 18:35:36+00:00): Новая спортивная площадка - это не name. Name - это официальное наименование. Тут вряд ли оно будет. Не используйте name для описаний.
b-jazz (2020-12-17 17:12:09+00:00): Hi Brian,
Is there a reason https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867908019 circles 3 or 4 times? I'm going to clean that up. Hope that doesn't break what you were intending.
Brian@Brea (2020-12-17 17:44:50+00:00): Nope. It was just supposed to be a simple circle building. Portlach must have screwed up when trying to make circler and I didn’t catch it. Thanks for the fix.
Ernesto David Acosta Fernandez (2020-11-07 15:56:56+00:00): Que fue lo que editas te
Ernesto David Acosta Fernandez (2020-11-07 15:58:37+00:00): Oye hermano necesito que te muevas rápido con las ediciones de sibanicu. Ya es hora que tu pueblo tenga representación.te puedes guiar por el mapa de las ciudades de Nuevitas. Camaguey y florida que han sido editados por mi. Si tienes dudas contactame
literan (2020-11-07 11:15:31+00:00): ну и зачем вы скривили дома? откат
DressyPear4 (2020-11-09 12:02:37+00:00): Olá, building corresponde apenas a área construída, e nomes não devem ser abreviados.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93692311
Reinhard12 (2020-11-12 21:23:54+00:00): Stimmt, das ist die Terrasse. Aber 
1. hast du das nicht selbst 2013 als Biergarten getagged? 
2. gehört diese Anmerkung nicht in den Namen, oder?
Gruß
Reinhard
Ziltoidium (2020-11-13 09:11:49+00:00): sorry, da hat sich über die mobile App "streetcomplete" ein Fehler eingeschlichen. habe ich korrigiert
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-04-09 10:28:07+00:00): What is the intended meaning of "building:ownership=owner"? Can object be owned by someone else than owner?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867922999/history
geri-oc (2020-11-07 14:07:48+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-waterway	4

werden im iD angezeigt Gelbes Achtung !"
Vielleicht etwas genauer arbeiten und Fehler vermeiden oder korrigieren.
geoaria (2021-04-27 18:02:25+00:00): ویرایش های شما در غرب اصفهان پر از اشتباه است. حتما در هنگام عبور مسیر از مادی ها از پل استفاده کنید .32.65879/51.63576
Ultios (2022-10-14 09:11:33+00:00): Kecamatan Pakualaman akibat ini terpecah menjadi Pura Paku Alaman + Bausasran (Kelurahan) + Gunung ketur (kelurahan) + Batas Wilayah RW02 Gunung Ketur (?????).
Mohon diperhatikan!
Miguel Pedr (2020-12-13 12:41:29+00:00): Hola,
Aquí los datos estaban bien antes, ha agregado direcciones en ambos lados de las carreteras que son correctas y dejó las carreteras cerca de las medianas circulares, se modelaron de manera incompleta y dejaron las carreteras y también dejaron sin asignar las carreteras de un solo sentido que afectarán la ruta y el tráfico, los datos deben estar completamente modelados para obtener buenos datos de mapas. Esté atento a las direcciones en los cruces para una buena ruta.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93694534
CarrollCreekPark (2020-12-15 02:34:15+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thank you for finding this and letting me know. I appreciate your update on these two roads, as all the one ways here look accurate now.
Traducción:
Hola Miguel Pedr, Gracias por encontrar esto y avisarme. Aprecio su actualización sobre estos dos caminos, ya que todos los caminos aquí parecen precisos ahora.
ortho_is_hot (2020-11-07 07:34:56+00:00): Hi, has this road opened yet?

Regards,
ortho_is_hot
Vikram Vetrivel Personal Information (2020-11-10 02:00:53+00:00): Opens next month.

It's updated on GMaps
Leon K (2020-11-30 04:31:33+00:00): According to local a facebook post it's still at least a week away from now.  Why is it primary, the construction tag is tertiary?  Also you should never use Google Maps as a source for anything on OSM.
PT-53 (2020-11-07 18:11:05+00:00): Hallo Spacecamper,
mneben dem Namen der Firma wäre genauso wichtig, was die Firma macht.
Schau hier mal nach:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft
Grüße und Willkommen bei OSM
PT-53 (2020-11-22 10:08:35+00:00): Hallo Spacecamper, 
ist dort wirklich eine "Fabrik" (mit Serienfertigung etc.) oder ist das eine Handwerksfirma?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dworks

Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-12-06 12:35:34+00:00): Hallo Spacecamper, 
es wäre schön wenn Du noch antworten würdest.
Grüße
Spacecamper (2020-12-06 20:41:26+00:00): Ja, das ist eine Fabrik. Die bearbeitet Ware die in z. B. Autogetriebe oder Großmotren kommt. Stückzahlen pro Teil bis über eine Millionen pro Jahr. Siehe auch die Homepage der Firma. Arbeitet im norma Fall 3-schichtig. Ist also wirklich eine klassische Fabrik.
PT-53 (2020-12-07 08:04:11+00:00): Ja,bei diesen Stückzahlen kann man nicht mehr von Handwerk sprechen.
Danke für die Rückmeldung.
Warin61 (2020-11-17 10:13:59+00:00): Hi

Arr.. no. 

Only one relation is required, not two. 

The relation should then have 2 members;
way 867936796 with the role outer
way 867936797 with the role inner

Next issue: way 867936796 has the same tags as the relation ... so the hole in the middle of the relation is pained over because the way says it is all water... remove the tags from the way and that will than leave the relation. 

----------- Hope that makes some sort of sense.
Warin61 (2020-11-17 10:15:47+00:00): Error .. mine.
"pained over" should be "painted over"
Alexey Vazhnov (2020-11-07 11:50:18+00:00): Please don't do such changes in different parts of world in one edit.
JamBeast (2020-11-11 14:27:51+00:00): I don't think I've been in different parts of the world... I'm keeping it local... Maybe some bug?
Alexey Vazhnov (2020-11-11 14:37:47+00:00): I don't know how, but you changed also this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5873963387
JamBeast (2020-11-11 15:00:42+00:00): I see now the comment was not for me... :-)
JochenOSM (2020-11-07 09:53:39+00:00): Hallo toptimax, danke für deine Änderung, das ist sehr aktuell.
Zwei Dinge hätte ich anders gemacht: 1) Die Bauumfahrungen die es ja noch gibt hätte ich nicht gelöscht sondern als access=no gekennzeichnet bis sie rückgebaut sind. Derzeit sind sie ja noch da. Und wenn sie rückgebaut sind hätte ich sie als razed gekennzeichnet. 2) Zusammen mit den anderen bereits als razed gekennzeichneten ehemaligen Straßenverläufen hätte ich das solange in der Datenbank stehen lassen bis es neue Luftbilder gibt. Erfahrungsgemäß kommt nun nämlich früher oder später jemand der in bester Absicht die korrekt erfassten Daten an ein veraltetes Luftbild anpasst. Solange es razed Linien gibt die seinem alten Luftbild entsprechen unterlässt er das mit größerer Wahrscheinlichkeit. ;)
DENelson83 (2020-11-07 07:50:46+00:00): That's "Naut'sa mawt", with a W.
PT-53 (2020-11-08 10:15:29+00:00): Hallo Chef 100,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz ein Stück der Günzburger Straße gelöscht, wie Du hier sehen kannst:
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=93696804

Ich nehme an, daß das ein Versehen war, da ich auf
https://www.weissenhorn.de/buergerservice-und-politik/service/aktuelle-baustellen/
keinen Hinweis auf eine Vollsperrung der Straße dort finden konnte. Ich habe diesen Teil Deiner Änderungen daher wieder zurückgesetzt.

Für eine Rückmeldung bitte in diesem Änderungssatz einen neuen Kommentar eintragen.

Grüße
PT-53 (2020-11-08 10:17:28+00:00): PS: 
Wolltest Du eventuell nur einen Hydranten löschen?
AnonymousAlligator (2020-11-08 00:23:24+00:00): Hi! Just to let you know, you didn't mark these places as buildings--that'll cause them not to be shown quite right on the map. I've gone ahead and fixed that.

Other than that, your edits look great! Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for contributing!
maro21 (2020-11-07 14:51:50+00:00): O, wcześniej nie słyszałem o takiej wyspie. Czy jest jakieś inne źródło poza Wikipedią? Wikipedia jako źródło podaje link do artykułu, którego już nie ma...
Mordechai23 (2020-11-07 16:17:21+00:00): Rzeczywiście widziałem że na tej wikipedii nie wiadomo skąd to się wzięło, natomiast po wpisaniu frazy w google znajduje mnóstwo artykułów w prasie, głównie architektonicznej (w końcu dopiero co zbudowano tu pierwszy budynek) wymieniających wyspę pod taką nazwą, co wg mnie przesądza o tym że jest to nazwa używana
maraf24 (2021-02-17 19:20:28+00:00): Jest różnica między nazwą używaną a nazwą powszechnie używaną. Nazwy historyczne też są używane - przez historyków. Nie trafiają jednak do name.
GinaroZ (2020-11-07 16:10:17+00:00): Hi, thanks for the update to this - I've removed the access=no
Frans S (2020-11-13 16:07:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here. 
Your mappings are quite accurate.
Please map buildings without connecting the nodes to each other. Use the ctr key while mapping. 
Best regardss
Lejun (2020-11-14 07:01:30+00:00): Without seeing any alley or gap in between buildings, shouldn't nodes be connected as to say "This wall is shared bewteen those two buildings" ?
Frans S (2020-11-15 12:10:10+00:00): Hi. This is a discussion since long on severeal  internet fora..
Because we take a look from appr 1.000 km ( as far I know) on an image with a detail of less than a few meters we cannot see the actual connection between buildings. We can't even see it in front of a building.
(see this example)
https://yandex.com.tr/harita/115713/bayrakli/house/7020_sok_134/Zk4YdwRoT0wPQF1ifXh2c3VrYw==/?ll=27.140322%2C38.471796&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=110.423635%2C1.406222&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=27.138098%2C38.472043&panorama%5Bspan%5D=120.000000%2C64.394997&z=16
 Exept when it is obvious that buildings share walls (we should only find it out by local visiting) we are urged to map each building as an individual building.
If you are also on the HOTOSM channel on Slack you will see there are lots of discussions on this subject.
https://hotosm.slack.com/archives/C4GLC45PY/p1604311329124700
I hope this info is sufficient for you
Best regards
Lejun (2020-11-15 17:28:10+00:00): Fine by me. Thanks you for this constructive answer !
Vinber-Pro (2020-11-07 11:17:32+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour vos contributions. Pourriez vous cependant préciser dans le commentaire de modifications ce que vous faites ? 
Vous semblez éditer depuis gnome maps, je ne connais pas, cela m'intéresse carrément :)
au plaisir
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93700607
Vinber-Pro (2020-11-07 11:19:44+00:00): Sorry i was thinking you're french, not sure in fact.
Tranlation (deepL)
Hello and thank you for your contributions. Could you however specify in the commentary of changes what you are doing?
You seem to edit from gnome maps, I don't know, I'm really interested :)
cklnrd (2020-11-07 12:41:11+00:00): Bonjour Vinber-Pro!

I do read French, but my English is far better, thank you.

I was using the gnome app as a test for adding items.

org.gnome.Maps is a standard app on newer versions on GNU/Linux and is an easy (too easy, perhaps) way to setup an openstreetmap account and add items, simply by rightclicking and selecting "add to  openstreetmap". It has the benefit of being able to switch quickly between showing air (photo) view and map view to get a more accurate position.

However, it apparently does not show all items currently on the map, so I will double check openstreetmap.org before adding more items that way. :-O

I will remove my redundant additions. You should however also be aware of the redundancy between 6592763032 and 4741844223 which has existed for at least one year.

Merci and have a nice day.

Yours
alendra_y (2020-11-27 03:28:32+00:00): Hello, there is no Subway in Balikpapan for now, what is this change for?
kapazao (2020-11-08 08:51:11+00:00): He corregido algunos errores en estas ediciones, como cambios de tipos de vía incorrectos o enlaces movidos lejos de la posición donde deberían estar (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway=motorway_link "Cómo se debe dibujar")
Se le ha avisado varias veces de este tipo de ediciones y de que en los conjuntos de cambios debe poner comentarios específicos de lo que se ha hecho y no "Precisión" como pone en todos, pero sigue haciendo caso omiso. Otros conjuntos de cambios serán revertidos al completo.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93700941
hocu (2020-11-07 10:00:12+00:00): Oops! Forgot to update the changeset comment. I've refined part of a coastline.
Puxan (2020-11-08 11:07:49+00:00): @Flullia  Buen trabajo, pero recuerda que debes conectar las vías entre ellas, no dejarlas muy próximas.  Muy bien, Sigue mapeando.    Joaquim
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93701068
lakedistrict (2020-11-07 18:50:45+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits in Shap. There seems to be 2 different spellings: Ralfland (on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160505402) and Ralphland (on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867971679) - please can you confirm which is correct? Thanks :)
andrewilley (2020-11-08 00:44:54+00:00): The correct spelling for both parts is "Ralfland View", possibly my mistake when I joined the road segments?

The roads around there are really odd: House numbers 1-4 in Ralfland View actually face out onto the main A6, while 5-10 are on the residential road behind. And at number 10, the road name changes from Ralfland View to Moss Grove and the very next house along is 10 Moss Grove. Very confusuing, two numbers 10s side by side!
lakedistrict (2020-11-09 21:39:53+00:00): Thanks for fixing :)
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-25 11:05:23+00:00): Hello ielham, in this change set you added surface=paving_stones:double_t. What does the suffix "double_t" means? Looks like c++ :D

e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/292716564

Cheers
ielham (2020-12-25 11:35:24+00:00): Hello Ze0zohk1. The only thing I changed was in the tag "lit", others changes were made by other people. By the way, "double T" is a type of paving stones... Maybe it was an improvement in the accuracy of that surface (but I don't know if it is allowed in that way). Greetings
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-25 11:37:21+00:00): Hey ielham, thanks for your help! Cheers
opendcc (2020-11-07 11:12:10+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap und viel Spaß. Eine kleine Anmerkung: die Information in description sollte eine kurzer, knackiger Hinweis für den User sein (z.B. 'Zugang nur von Süden'), Für ausführliche Infos gibt es den Weblink, das muß auf OSM nicht inhaltlich wiederholt werden. Werbung ist auf OSM absolut unerwünscht. Das gilt für kommerzielle Unternehmen genauso wie für Religionsgemeinschaften. Ich bitte daher, die Beschreibung entsprechend anzupassen. Danke.
KCBCOM (2020-11-07 14:42:32+00:00): Hallo opendcc,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ich habe die Beschreibung angepasst (gekürzt, versachlicht).
Viele Grüße aus Deggendorf
kapazao (2020-11-08 08:56:47+00:00): Los cambios realizados en los enlaces de primary_link a secondary_link son incorrectos, revisa la wiki por favor (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:This_table_highlights_how_you_connect_different_types_of_highway,_based_on_the_type_of_the_highway._.png)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93701621
Puxan (2020-11-08 11:10:59+00:00): @Flullia   Buen trabajo. No olvides escuadrar los edificios.  Muy bien, sique mapeando.    Joaquim
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/93701710
SK53 (2021-06-05 12:51:49+00:00): Hi Kev,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/867976441 is not a dual use cycle path and should not be marked as such, even if people use it as one. It is a route pinch point and results in significant conflict between cyclists (electric scooter users too) and pedestrians (and very specifically my Dad, who cant hear cyclists & is at risk of falling every time they zoom past). There are even pinch points on the pavement themselves: not just the bus stop, but the corner of the lodge has a huge CCTV camera base which restricts minimum width to around 1.2 m. I think the route should follow Derby Road itself (probably best to just delete this way & check that sidewalk tags exist on Derby Road).

Cheers,

Jerry
kevjs1982 (2021-06-05 13:43:35+00:00): Hmm, checking my footage I can see this path is signed as shared use https://imgur.com/DA5LBXp  From memory there is also wayfinding signage pointing down the path coming from the campus (I've not got access to this years footage on this PC).  Will need to double check next time I pass.
SK53 (2021-06-05 16:08:11+00:00): Wow, looks very likely. I'll check in the morning if not before. It looks as though this replaced a cycle in the bus lane sign https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.947008609965295&lng=-1.1853297800135745&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=HMSMG9VuqD5jfMRgUj2yFg.
SK53 (2021-06-05 16:09:00+00:00): Yes, there back last summer on Mapillary https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.946945&lng=-1.1854080555555555&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=z9nTr677JZa0Gi51waMgo6&x=0.37487418535363703&y=0.44199733048049994&zoom=2
SK53 (2021-06-08 18:39:17+00:00): I took a short Mapillary sequence travelling W-E https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ouIIH13BCj03WBpzLP378c. I've also checked signage from other direction. I now believe that the shared-path sign is a warning that NCN6 is just ahead: 1) the pole is co-incident with the tactile paving strip; 2) there is no share-path roundel on the other side of the pole; 3) no cycle route signage pointing to the University approaching the toucan from the N. I therefore think this is not a share use segment, although travelling W-bound it is very likely to be used as such.

I have a feeling that the original University<->Jubilee went along Charnock Avenue to the Sutton Passeys crossing & thence along the W side of Middleton Boulevard, but the paths from the end of Charnock are scarcely used by cyclists now.

I'll do a bit more sleuthing for signage on this side of the QMC roundabout (& collect Mapillary traces too).
aachso (2020-11-07 19:55:48+00:00): Hallo congar58 und willkommen bei OSM!

Du hast hier ein Gebäude erstellt, das

a) vermutlich nicht existiert
b) eine Straße schneidet
c) zwei Gebäude schneidet
d) über der Straße und den Gebäuden schweben soll
e) nicht rechteckig ist
f) keine gültige URL als Webseite angegeben hat

Weder auf Luftbildern, noch auf anderen Karten, noch auf dem Foto der GVW-Webseite ist ein derartiges Gebäude zu erkennen.

Etwas mehr Mühe solltest du dir schon geben. Bitte mach dich mit den Grundlagen vom OSM vertraut (https://openstreetmap.org/help) und versuch es nochmal. Wenn du dir unsicher bist, frag bitte *vorher* im Forum oder einem anderen Kanal nach. Deine Änderungen habe ich hier rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93718679

Gruß