piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-10-01 13:22:52+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126515991
Bang Badai (2022-09-26 02:31:57+00:00): Gg Buntu Damai  jalan bulak cabe barat RT 5 RW 9 Kel cilincing kec. Cilincing jakarta utara
Toddtodd (2022-09-27 15:18:19+00:00): What do you mean?
Diógenes de Sinope (2022-09-22 21:04:35+00:00): is it not fair to consider a man made structure that allows it's users to pass over an obstacle (in this case it would be an open drain) without obstructing whatever lays below said structure as a bridge?
VLD303 (2022-09-22 23:02:40+00:00): Hello  Diógenes de Sinope,
Thank you for reaching out.  As I understand the osm wiki on culverts and bridges (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dculvert , https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge), the culvert is a -1 layer under ground. Thus, as a man made object that is below the ground layer, no bridge or layer tag is needed for a road that goes over the culvert. Where the lower feature is surrounded by earth then the lower feature should probably be tagged using tunnel=*.
Please enjoy the rest of your day,
Andrew
Diógenes de Sinope (2022-09-23 08:35:03+00:00): I see, now I realise what I had done wrong, the fact that some portions of the drain were tagged as 'culverts' is something that I did not consider at all, I should have been more thorough

on second inspection, the portions where a drain passes under a road are indeed culverts and not bridges, depression were dug out at the locations in question for the purpose of them serving as a drain, openings were made beneath the road where it meets the drain to allow fluid pass through

thank you for the clarification and the correction
DUGA (2023-01-06 14:20:20+00:00): I saw the sign of no bike and no horse.
ElliottPlack (2023-01-06 17:09:39+00:00): Yes, there’s a photo of it on the wiki, the one with the giant “NO”
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-23 15:10:56+00:00): Ciao. L'osmc:symbol del sentiero 11 è errato. Ciao, Andrea
dieterdreist (2022-10-24 13:45:47+00:00): grazie, risolto. Ciao, Martin
user_3022894 (2023-01-17 19:07:11+00:00): Hallo zubriggen,

sorry erstmal, dass ich hier so reinplatze,

ganz kurz zu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192213798

Den Unterstand würde ich nicht aus dem Bahnsteig-Multipolygon "ausschneiden". Der Unterstand ist ja begehbar - wenn man innerhalb des Unterstandes steht, dann steht man ja immer noch auf dem Bahnsteig, oder?
Sprich, unter dem Unterstand, da ist ja nicht "nichts", sondern da liegt das gleiche Bahnsteigpflaster wie auf dem restlichen Bahnsteig auch. Unterstände befinden sich grundsätzlich UF einem Bahnsteig. 

Daher schneiden wir sie nie aus Bahnsteig-MPs aus.

Darüber wollte ich dir nur eben kurz Bescheid geben.
Viele Grüße
Lukas
zubriggen (2023-01-19 07:18:01+00:00): Hallo Lukas,

Danke für deinen Kommentar. Ich habe den Unterstand als eigenständiges Objekt erlebt. Wenn ich aus einem Zug aussteige, bin ich erst mal auf dem Bahnsteig und gelange von dort aus in den Unterstand.  Ich denke das 'in einem Zug aus- und einsteigen' macht einen Bahnsteig aus. Daß Unterstand und Bahnsteig den gleichen Bodenbelag haben macht ihn nicht zum gleichen Objekt. Und daß er begehbar ist, halte ich für irgendwie selbstverständlich; das hat er mit vielen Gebäuden, Strassen, Wegen, etc. gemeinsam. 

Daß sich Unterstände grundsätzlich auf einem Bahnsteig befinden, kann ich auch bestätigen. Ich kenne Unterstände, die neben oder sogar etwas abseits von Bahnsteigen oder Bushaltestellen liegen. Auch kenne ich andere Orte und Bahnhöfe, wo Unterstände und andere Gebäude nicht als Teil des Bahnsteig-MP kartiert sind. Ich kann da nicht nachvollziehen auf welcher Basis du zu deinen Einschätzungen mit 'nie' oder 'grundsätzlich' kommst. 

Beste Grüße
user_3022894 (2023-03-25 18:18:19+00:00): Hi,

ach so, verstehe, ja, das war's. Habe dieses Thema by the way an ein paar anderen Stellen auch mit anderen Mappern besprochen und dabei kam im Großen und Ganzen gesagt "nur" heraus: "Viele sehen es zwar ähnlich wie ich, aber nicht alle. Im Grunde macht der eine es so, der andere macht es so 😄"
Zumindest auch ein Ergebnis.

Mit "Daß sich Unterstände grundsätzlich auf einem Bahnsteig befinden" meinte ich eher, dass es hier, in diesem Fall, quasi so ist. Sprich, zuerst wurde (damals bei der Erneuerung) der Bahnsteig gebaut. Als eine, zusammenhängende Fläche. Danach wurde dann der Unterstand auf diese Fläche "draufgesetzt". So als würde man bspw. eine Sitzbank auf einen Parkplatz stellen.

Natürlich impliziert das nicht, dass sich Unterstände nicht auch komplett außerhalb von jeglichen Bahnsteigarealen befinden können.

Aber ist jetzt denke ich auch egal, man wird es sicherlich in diesem Fall so belassen können, wollte da jetzt auch keinen zu großen Wind drum machen.
Verzeih' bitte, dass ich mit meiner gewählten Formulierung den Eindruck einer, ich sage mal, "Absolutheit" erweckt habe.

Viele Grüße
Lukas
user_2066394 (2022-09-23 09:31:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
aceman444 (2023-01-08 15:38:04+00:00): Zdravim, uvadzajte skutocne zdroje Vasich udajov. Dakujem.

Inak tieto zmeny nie su najstastnejsie. Je sice pekne, ze chcete vyznacit mury kostolov, ale to neznamena, ze vnutro uz nie su ruiny, ci vnutro kostola nema niest nazov kostola, co ste urobili. Vnutorne obrysy nemuseli byt vynate z relacii kostola a klastora, len by bolo treba rozlisit, co je building (aj ked tiez vnutro budovy patri do budovy), pripadne co su len mury.
aceman444 (2023-01-08 16:25:14+00:00): Pozrite napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/766771649#map=19/48.14208/17.10103
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:59:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards. 
I reviewed all your changesets on this project.
Please pay attention to next points:
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126517439
Carto_Graph (2022-09-23 19:03:50+00:00): Building с крытого рынка случайно снесли?
Mostalk (2022-09-25 16:04:48+00:00): Поправил
JJIglesias (2022-09-22 19:25:11+00:00): Saludos. 
Si te interesa mapear arboles:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dtree
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-12-31 02:43:08+00:00): pare de alinhar com a camada Bing, deve usar a camada Maxar
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:53:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126517770
VLD062 (2024-05-28 21:59:58+00:00): Hello TheBestIdea, I hope this message finds you well. I was curious if you know of any resources that would allow me to confirm whether specific paths, such as way: 226504887, are accessible for both pedestrians and cyclists. This information is vital as it will enable me to authenticate any modifications I make before submitting the changesets, like adding foot=yes permission to cycleway-tagged ways. Currently, I have been using available street view data, but there isn't always a sign/ lane markings posted that can be seen. 

Thank you!
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:53:13+00:00): Hello. The irregular shape of this building is caused by the reflection of the sun on this roof.
Just map those objects as a rectangular building.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126518036
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:21:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
BCNorwich (2022-09-23 06:43:08+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've removed the tag alt_name:tr=Londra Kulesi as it isn't an alternative name.

Regards Bernard.
tarfurm (2022-09-26 11:08:34+00:00): Hi Bernard,
"Londra Kalesi" means Castle of London, and "Londra kulesi" means Tower of London. It seems they both are widely used in Turkish for the same place. For example, following wiki page has the title Londra Kalesi, but the place is referred as "Londra Kulesi" through the rest of the article. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Londra_Kalesi

I think it would help the search for both cases.

Regards,
Tayfur
BCNorwich (2022-09-26 17:33:56+00:00): My apologies, my bad interpretation I thought both spellings meant the same thing. I've reinstated the alt name.

Regards Bernard
JJIglesias (2022-09-22 19:22:59+00:00): Saludos. Si te interesa mapear los arboles, tal vez te sirva leer esto:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:natural%3Dtree
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:49:45+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126518798
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
george1201 (2022-09-23 21:47:38+00:00): Statt alle Knoten und Wege zu löschen, wäre es besser gewesen, wenn man sie mit eine Lifecycle-Prefix versehen hätte (z.B. removed, abandoned, disused, ...). Dann wäre nämlich noch die History zu sehen gewesen. Jetzt hast einen Zustand hergestellt, als wäre an dieser Stelle nie ein Sportplatz gewesen.
C_1965 (2022-09-24 08:45:13+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Verstehe!
Frans S (2022-09-23 12:10:33+00:00): Hello. Please improve your mapping skills.
I have send you a pm with my findings on your mappings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126520371
38446 (2022-09-29 19:27:26+00:00): Danke für die Verbesserungen! Bei der Kita in Cattenstedt sind die Daten allerdings jetzt dreifach vorhanden; die Informationen zu Name, Betreiber, Öffnungszeiten reichen aus an der amenity Fläche, die zur Adresse am Gebäude. Der Einzelpunkt (node) kann weg!
HansWürstchen (2022-10-02 11:00:07+00:00): Hallo,
ja, habe vergessen die Node zu löschen, den Rest hab ich mal angepasst.
SekeRob (2022-09-23 16:47:55+00:00): Are you sure this roundabout is real?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097104331

Somehow I remember you removing a roundabout in the very same place last year.

Anyway, QA flags it, a RB should have no name but when unique, needs junction=roundabout and removal of the superfluous oneway tag. All roundabouts on Marconi are of a hybrid hamburger type, the through way only for buses like you can see on the other ones on that street. The city so smartly is now installing bus activated traffic lights because that was is accidents in the waiting. Not seen progress though in a few weeks, but tomorrow I'm cycling south and the go-pro will register, has better memory than me too, solid state as it's called ;o)

ciao

PS There's also a flag of sudden level change from D'Ascanio onto the roundabout but that one does not make sense at all.
damianeue (2022-09-23 19:04:28+00:00): I forgot about the changeset where I removed it, very vaguely remember it now that you've mentoned it... I don't visit that place very often, I saw the satellite imagery that still shows a roundabout and I put it there. I'm sorry, hopefully tomorrow you'll solve the question about its existence by biking in that zone.

Also: don't know the flag for D'Ascanio, iD doesn't show it to me.
SekeRob (2022-09-25 13:20:46+00:00): I've seen and applied the reverter. A very actively mapped area just does not pop up new / forgotten roundabouts (sat imagery on OSM is way, way outdated, Clarity the worst with bad offset too).
Even a split raised curb on the crossing to prevent the Buffalo Bill leaving traffic, possibly inebriated, to cross the Marconi nightly race track into D'Acanio' Only a right is possible. Double white line not to Uturn, but that does not stop any Pescarese, just the navigator app.
Added bus lane tagging while there (will know tomorrow if QA accepts the choices as there are 3 schemes to do this, scheme 2 and 3 having fairly equal use, scheme 2 the simplest and preferred.
Imagery on a map note for your  verification view. ;o)
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:46:14+00:00): See my comments on previous changesets. They are also valid for this changeset.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126520806
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:45:01+00:00): Hello again.
Your mappings here are rather oversized and not correct mapped.
Please be more precise next mappings.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126520844
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:43:42+00:00): Hello
About your mappings here.
You identify the buildings correctly, but mapped them oversized.
Keep that in mind please
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126520929
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:42:06+00:00): A few issues here.
Be sure you map buildings. Not every spot is a building. Check for a shadow and other proof that it is a building. 
Be sure to square each building.
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126521192
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:39:45+00:00): Your mappings here are rather oversized. 
Check the shadow for the length of the roof.
Best  regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126521233
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:38:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key, You did not square 2 buildings.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126521301
orthocircular (2022-09-28 01:48:56+00:00): Hey there thanks for this contribution however there was already a node for this feature when you added the line (10017047729), and it seems like a node (coordinates sourced from USGS) may be more appropriate than a line (topo maps suggest the basin is not linear, and doesn't really extend north-south in this area.)
Kai Johnson (2022-09-28 03:13:39+00:00): Thanks for catching the duplicate node. Sorry I missed that. The line was an attempt to reflect the broader area of the basin, but a node is fine.
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:36:34+00:00): Hello. The objects here are trucks. No buildings. 
You can see it on the typical shape. 
I removed them
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126521421
Gabriel44200 (2022-10-19 20:46:36+00:00): A estación leva instalada case 1 mes pero de momento aínda non está funcionando, aínda que está prevista abrila en breve
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:33:40+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention to next points:
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
I removed the lower mapping.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126521865
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:34:42+00:00): Please square each building with the Q key !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126521926
pitfire (2022-09-23 04:03:35+00:00): Hallo MertensSt,

willkommen bei OSM!

Korrekturen machen wir alle. Es währe schön, bereits in der Änderungsbeschreibung näheres zu erfahren. Das erleichtert die Überprüfbarkeit!

Verwende das Name-Tag nicht, um Dinge zu beschreiben.

Unter "DE:Good practice"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Gute_%C3%84nderungssatz-Kommentare%E2%86%99
findest du weitere gute Tipps.

Gruß
Enock4seth (2023-06-21 12:46:52+00:00):  I am sure it should be moved to Mango Street instead but where?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-23 00:54:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/340870683#map=14/51.0670/18.8366 - jesteś pewien tego mostu?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-24 18:37:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3372429 - a tego? i innych?
verttte (2022-11-16 06:34:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Подскажите, откуда взято название подстанции, в каком источнике? Если он общедоступен, то не могли бы поделиться ссылкой?
snakeplants (2022-09-22 21:28:16+00:00): Correction: Source used was Strava.
Dimitar155 (2022-09-23 11:37:20+00:00): Hello ivyseal and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

It's usually not correct to replace street names with the names of residential complexes since that's not their real name. For residential complexes, you have to create a point, choose the suburb preset and fill in the blank spaces (I've done it for this complex). If you see any other missing complexes around Razlog, feel free to add them. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me.

Best wishes,
Dimitar
Frans S (2022-09-23 10:26:18+00:00): In addition to my review of changeset 12622723
you did not square all buildings and mapped pieces of land as a building.
You also mapped oversized buildings. Check the shadow. This shows the width of a building on 1 side. 
Experience helps to identify buildings.

Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126522492
MapeadorCB (2022-09-24 12:07:44+00:00): Porque está desfazendo meu trabalho de detalhamento do mapa? Ainda estou fazendo e demorei um bom tempo para conseguir detalhar bem o mapa e, de repente, você desfaz grande parte? Não entendi.
AjBelnuovo (2022-09-24 13:03:47+00:00): Porque no OSM há regras e padrões . 
Não se abrevia e nem se coloca aspas em nomes 
O nome deve vir de fonte oficial e/ou conhecimento local , sendo especificado em Fontes .
Não se cria nomes para vias  . Só são validos os que constam no IBGE.
Para se detalhar usasse tag' s especificas .
Não necessidade de duplicidade de informações , por ex. criasse um edifício com a informação de Clinica e também para o mesmo local criasse um ponto Clínica com o nome da mesma , sendo que o nome e os demais detalhes podem ser todos inseridos no edifício usando tag's especificas .
loir (2022-12-14 14:41:17+00:00): Напряжение указывается целиком, со всеми нолями (10000, а не 10кв). 
Разные напряжения разделяются ";", а не "/"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:voltage?uselang=ru