piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2021-03-29 04:56:07+00:00): Hi erickdeoliveiraleal,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding unconnected ways. As you probably know, those can not be used by routing software:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.26185&lat=-12.81733&zoom=9

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
Ludhiana (2021-03-25 10:59:22+00:00): Why got https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/685968507/history deleted by you? A better explanation than just "rail" would be nice.
user_5359 (2021-03-25 05:19:55+00:00): Hello! 
You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. CIV_POSTAL	B3N 1J3
DISTRICT	09
FULL_CIVIC	182
GSA_NAME	Halifax
OBJECTID	56780407
PID	00208603
STR_NAME	St Margarets Bay Road
Please explain  the meaning of the keys.

Bevor you delete this please a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8558714006 and 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8558754726. Booth are in the building with addr:housenumber 182.
Dartmouthmapmaker (2021-03-25 14:49:05+00:00): Fixed
dval (2021-05-23 04:31:58+00:00): Когда рисуете culvert под дорогой, добавляйте также layer=-1.
dval (2021-05-23 05:15:22+00:00): Не понятно, зачем рисовать калверты там, где их нет. Например, река Коровка пересекает дорогу, которая не используется летом. Даже если там калверт когда-то и был, то он уже давно заилисля, и там просто брод. Я был на концах той дороги, знаю ситуацию не по старым космоснимкам. Это говорит о том, что вам без разницы, рисовать существующее или выдуманное, главное - рисовать. Но на проверку ваших правок приходится тратить время.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 22:35:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103663230 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still problematic.
Supaplex (2021-03-25 06:36:38+00:00): 你確定這裡有醫院嗎?因為看地址並不是這裡
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101681593
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:23:26+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
GOwin (2021-03-25 08:00:26+00:00): This is a good edit. Thank you.

It is safe to remove the "fixme" tag, if you were able to resolve it, just like in this case.

You can try adding the street names in the vicinity, too. :)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101682565
nitro_expander (2021-03-25 03:49:39+00:00):  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
house names shouldn't be added to public map
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-25 20:42:07+00:00): No physical separation here, it's just a high radius corner.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101683229
allkrupa (2021-03-29 07:53:39+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing and correcting the edit, Apologies for the wrong addition of road segment, will ensure not to repeat such errors. Looking forward to learn more from you.

regards,
allkrupa.
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-25 17:42:17+00:00): This seems rather inventive to have a graduated curve at a T intersection.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101683707
allkrupa (2021-03-26 07:55:27+00:00): Hi, Thank you for reviewing my edits. It is an honest mistake from my end, I have made the changes in this changeset (#101769826). I will be extra cautious going forward, Happy to learn from you! 

Regards,
allkrupa.
attili1 (2021-05-21 04:31:52+00:00): Hi Elyana IRM-ED,

Trust you are doing great!

While reviewing the data in Langson,Vietnam we found 668 unconnected nodes (Refer: node 8459520420 node 8459520422 node 8555432090 node 8555432426 node 8555399913 node 8555399889 etc) across the multiple highways. 


Refer:https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-8vFH3TW7-v4/YKYN0X6nFYI/AAAAAAAADWo/dF7tvnnqQWcm-jaK2XDIrWaHS6zR0kzEACK8BGAsYHg/s0/2021-05-20.png?authuser=2

I have cleaned up all the 1090 orphan nodes in the https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105005833.
Feel free to reach out to us in case you have any questions. 

Happy Mapping 
Manoj
Elyana IRM-ED (2021-05-25 00:38:07+00:00): Hi, attili1

Thank you for letting me know.
Sorry for due accidental technical issue caused orphan nodes and thank you for fixing and improve the data.

Happy mapping!
Baloo Uriza (2021-03-25 17:34:10+00:00): name=* is only the name, it is not ref=*.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101683940
allkrupa (2021-03-26 08:00:01+00:00): Hi, Thank you for reviewing my edits. It is an honest mistake from my end, I have made the changes in this changeset (#101768048). I will be extra cautious going forward, Happy to learn from you! 

Regards,
allkrupa.
julcnx (2026-06-16 04:00:16+00:00): Hi, some of the ways tagged `surface=clay` in this changeset appear to be laterite roads. `surface=laterite` was approved on 2026-06-15 and describes this surface more precisely. Would you be comfortable retagging? Happy to do it if you prefer. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
topius (2026-06-19 09:49:59+00:00): Could very well be that it is Laterite, as it does exist in some parts of Papua New Guinea. Haven’t been in this area. Feel free to update it.
literan (2021-03-25 19:01:21+00:00): я бы для совета ветеранов скорее office=ngo поставил. Ибо обычно это не клуб, где песни поют, а офис, где сидят несколько старичков-функционеров и пишут резолюции в поддержку путина и против рэпа
Grass-snake (2021-03-25 19:29:49+00:00): Мне всё равно. Или можно поставить
office=association + association=veteran.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dassociation

Завтра вечером поправлю, только скажи́те на что. Если ответа не будет, то укажу office=ngo.
literan (2021-03-25 20:01:40+00:00): наверное, office=association больше подойдет, забыл про него
Grass-snake (2021-03-26 03:45:19+00:00): Поправил
eggie (2021-03-25 08:29:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
ToniE (2021-03-26 10:07:05+00:00): Hola Luz,

route=minibus y route_master=minibus

no están definidos en OSM.

route=bus y route_master=bus

sería el etiquetado correcto, independientemente de si el autobús es pequeño o grande

Br
Toni
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-21 21:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105110920 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
nitro_expander (2021-03-25 17:53:18+00:00): cycleway?? 
did u mean a narrow path , mostly for walking , not for motor vehicles?
NieWnen (2021-03-25 13:56:03+00:00): Warto oznaczyć punkt jako "Szkoła językowa". W edytorze id można go wyszukać, bo jest na to tag, albo dopisać ręcznie amenity=language_school i wtedy
nazwę przeniósł bym z description do name=

Przy okazji wtedy można uzupełnić inne pola takie jak telefon/strona/nauczane języki/godziny otwarcia

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dlanguage_school
NieWnen (2021-03-29 16:16:10+00:00): Uszczegółowiłem zgodnie z informacjami ze strony (zmiana 101928550)
McGregor Wadowice (2021-03-30 13:21:39+00:00): Dziękuję :-)
GEO ECLA (2022-02-01 09:04:42+00:00): Quelle est la source du nom du sentier ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101693073
Laurent39 (2022-02-01 14:11:36+00:00): J'ai vu le nom "sentier du confinement " sur un Petit panneau sur site (C'était à but humoristique je pense ) J'ai gardé cette intentention
Omnific (2021-03-25 16:25:41+00:00): Glad we have a definitive answer now.
Famlam (2022-02-15 09:21:31+00:00): Dag Nonzz, de tag capacity geeft aan hoeveel auto's er tegelijk kunnen opladen. Voor het vermogen is de tag:
charging_station:output=xxx kW
Ik neem aan dat je de laatste bedoelde?
hauke-stieler (2021-03-25 12:40:29+00:00): Hi,

du hast hier (schon wieder) das Format der Telefonnumer gändert, sodass es nicht den Wiki-Vorgaben entspricht. Bitte nutze NUR das internationale +49 40 ... Format, danke.
Habe deine Änderungen (erneut) rückgängig gemacht.

Grüße
Hauke
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 09:52:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103129129 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted about their edits but problems still persist.
aharvey (2021-03-25 07:49:58+00:00): There were two buildings here deleted, from what I can tell there are still here, is that not the case?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 09:52:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103129129 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted about their edits but problems still persist.
SomeoneElse (2021-03-25 11:02:56+00:00): Please don't use "made up names" like "Jezero Toplik - MTB City road" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/908566265 .
Also adding a note "Part of Biciklistički park "MTB City road" relation" won't make anything magic happen - you'll need to create the relation and add the ways to it.  Please (as I've suggested numerous times in the past) ask at help.osm.org if you're unsure how to do this.
MTB FORIS (2021-03-25 11:29:47+00:00): http://mtb.4is.info/mtb-city-road/6.jpg
Nothing is made up. Here at the entrance there is a sign called LAKE TOPLIK and MTB CITY ROAD. See a photo of the sign.
I’m not sure how relationships work. I'll ask in the community.
MTB FORIS (2021-03-25 11:31:09+00:00): I added JEZERO TOPLIK to the OSM picnic area, which it is, but all this is content that belongs to the "MTB City road" bicycle park.
MTB FORIS (2021-03-25 11:33:48+00:00): Everything where I put the mark "MTV City road" on the OSM map, it exists and is physically placed.
Because all of this is the content of the bike park, which is spatially large, so it may be confusing on OSM. I'd like you to show me exactly how to edit this.
SomeoneElse (2021-03-25 12:14:23+00:00): On the use of names, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only is probably the best place to start reading.  There are a couple of Slavic translations of that page, but not yet Bosnian.
MTB FORIS (2021-03-25 16:38:44+00:00): I asked for help from the community.
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/79382/bicycle-park-mtb-city-road-help
user_10654882 (2021-04-10 17:09:37+00:00): This road is macadam and is used by motor vehicles.
This is a continuation of the street: "Đure Jakšića", so the name given by the user is not correct. I don't want to make a change, the administrator will do it.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-10 17:58:55+00:00): Looking at the Esri imagery underneath here, it looks like this way used to end just before https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8436241549 and has since been extended.  Also it doesn't (on the imagery that I can see) look like a macadam surface - but I'm not a local!
SomeoneElse (2021-04-10 18:02:41+00:00): Re the name, I'm sure the name of the _way_ isn't "Jezero Toplik - MTB City road", but it might well be part of a relation with a name like that.  Hopefully my answer at https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/79382/bicycle-park-mtb-city-road-help/79594 explains how to add bicycle route relations.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-10 18:07:15+00:00): One more question - what's the best imagery to use around here?  Buildings such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778222580 were added with Maxar Standard imagery.  All of the imagery I see in JOSM suggests that that was offset slightly.  Maxar Premium and Bing seem to agree - so presumably they are the best to use?
user_10654882 (2021-04-10 18:17:57+00:00): The bing map is better, although you can also look at the location on google maps : https://www.google.ba/maps/@43.8166362,18.3785324,325m/data=!3m1!1e3?hl=sr&authuser=0
I know the place and I have realistic pictures. The road is macadam and is used by motor vehicles
SomeoneElse (2021-04-10 18:21:03+00:00): To be clear, you can't "look at the location on google maps" and then add what you see to OpenStreetMap, but the licence is incompatible!
user_10654882 (2021-04-10 18:26:05+00:00): I understand that google maps and OSM are incompatible, I'm just giving an example that the Bing map is better and newer.
I have a great understanding of the OSM community and try to get real things transferred to OSM as they are.
user_10654882 (2021-04-10 18:34:52+00:00): realistic photo where a macadam road is seen : https://www.flickr.com/photos/192152915@N03/51108349725/
Kafabidunya (2021-03-26 19:46:48+00:00): Only for men.
Sonnenschauer (2021-03-27 06:10:07+00:00): Correct. Deleted name and description, which were wrong. Thank you.
GOwin (2021-03-25 07:45:50+00:00): Hi Eugene. 

Kindly refer to the highway=cycleway wiki for details about the use of this tag: https://openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway

The nature of the cycleway in Mandaue doesn't make this appropriate. Please use the tags we discussed in the session yesterday.
GOwin (2021-03-25 07:56:54+00:00): For more information, the Bicycle Wiki page in OpenStreetMap provides comprehensive information about biking-related tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle

In this particular case, you should add the tag cycleway:right=lane to the appropropriate segments of Ouano Avenue
mavl (2021-03-26 14:46:22+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок превращает парк в школу.  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3210669/history  
  
Школа уже есть на карте:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/177504688
pesec (2021-03-29 09:00:51+00:00): Территория школы не является парком, хотя на территории школы может находиться парковая зона локально.
Данный пакет правок указывает на принадлежность всей территории к школе.
mavl (2021-03-29 09:16:00+00:00): Данный пакет правок указывает, что школа называется "Школьный парк".  
  
amenity=	school  
name=Школьный парк  
type=multipolygon  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3210669/history  
  
И это дубликат тега amenity=	school.
pesec (2021-03-29 09:43:54+00:00): Дополнил и исправил
mavl (2021-03-26 14:38:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет дубликат школы.  
  
Новая школа - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921959207  
  
Школа, которая была обозначена раньше - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/54223401
pesec (2021-03-29 08:59:06+00:00): В данном пакете правок присвоено назначение территории школы.
Здание школы имеет/должно иметь отдельные теги.
Считаю правильным, чтобы все участки земли школ и детских садов в границах территорий имели тег: amenity=school или amenity=kindergarten соответственно.
mavl (2021-03-29 09:12:26+00:00): Значит со здания нужно убрать тег amenity=school. Любая школа должна обозначаться только один раз.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9E%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD_%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%8A%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_-_%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%BD_%D1%8D%D0%BB%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%82_OSM
L'imaginaire (2021-03-25 10:35:47+00:00): Dag Ann,
Er lag op deze weg geen beperking voor fietsers, dus ze expliciet toestaan zal niet veel veranderen aan de situatie. Er is wel eenrichtingsverkeer ingesteld op deze weg en ik weet niet of dat correct is. Ik heb dit even nagevraagd bij de mapper die de eenrichting er recent heeft opgezet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98640155
L'imaginaire (2021-03-25 13:47:23+00:00): Is ondertussen aangepast, zodat er voor fietsers geen eenrichtingsverkeer geldt
abakus_uploader (2021-03-25 23:31:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_10654882 (2021-03-25 09:43:53+00:00): Ove staze znaci fizicki postoje trenutno na trenu? :) mozete li ostaviti negdje gpx fajl od vaseg rutiranja. kao i neku fotografiju.
MTB FORIS (2021-03-25 10:01:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/MTB%20FORIS/traces/3612752

There are definitely more GPX files from the "MTB City road" terrain on my Strava profile and you are well acquainted with them and know that this is the official territory of the park. I posted the link to GPX for the OSM administrator and the public. Not for you at all.
user_10654882 (2021-04-12 06:24:16+00:00): Cycle Path # 549594872 does not exist on the ground
MrMoehritz (2021-03-27 21:49:13+00:00): Hi Bierer_J, willkommen bei OSM, super erster edit!
Bierer_J (2021-03-29 06:27:42+00:00): Vielen Dank
Super-Map (2021-04-05 07:07:28+00:00): Hi Class 203, we appreciate your help (the OSM communities), however you must use the correct tag for this element... morehover your "title" isn't correct, you must use in your title: "ajout d'un cabinet médical" and use the key "comment" for your own comment, in this case: "2 médecins sont dans ce cabinet ". Please as the biginner read the "biginner guide" before... as you know it's an open map as the "wiki" is open, accessible, for everyone... If you're interesting by this wonderfull map, so getting by "learning"...
eggie (2021-03-27 17:10:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM

You are sure this object are really here?
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101699527

Greetz,
eggie
DaveF (2021-03-27 16:56:42+00:00): Hi
1. What do these hashtags represent? 
2. The purpose of changesets comments is to provide meaningful descriptions to the average contributor. Could you please include them.
3. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/38975017 
The leisure=pitch tag is to define the 'white lines' of a playing area. This area is clearly for multiple sports & should therefore be tagged as a recreation ground.
Leo Slager (2021-04-12 14:11:35+00:00): Dag Gemeente,
De Bouwstraat ziet er nu wel erg vreemd uit.
Waarschijnlijk heb je onbedoeld de node van de kruising over een flinke afstand verschoven.
Dat gebeurt vooral als je over langere afstanden de kaart gaat verschuiven.
Liever niet schuiven met de kaart als je in de edit-mode bent.
Beter een kleine changeset uploaden en dan weer een nieuw gebied selecteren voor een volgende wijziging.
Hier kun je zien wat er fout is gegaan:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101700056
ik pas het even aan.
rskedgell (2021-03-25 12:29:11+00:00): I'm not sure if it's an Osmose quirk, but the 30 mph speed limit in the LBWF part of Snaresbrook Road should still be current. As far as I can tell, The [unhelpfully named] Waltham Forest (20 M.P.H. And 40 M.P.H.) (No. 2) Speed Limit Order 2019 hasn't been revoked.
https://www.thegazette.co.uk/notice/3234690
spiregrain (2021-03-25 12:34:44+00:00): I was aiming to remove the maxspeed only from the footpath, not the road... did I screw it up?
rskedgell (2021-03-25 12:38:31+00:00): No, my failure in reading comprehension, sorry.
It was the named cycleway/footway which threw me. I'm obviously caffeine deficient this lunchtime!
spiregrain (2021-03-25 13:25:18+00:00): My mistake here was neglecting to untick the 'reuse changeset' button, resulting in a 150 mile-wide changeset.
yvecai (2021-03-25 17:34:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi toutes ces pistes de ski 'effacées' ?
Salutations, 
Yves
JJBike (2021-03-25 20:01:11+00:00): Bonjour. Ces pistes ne sont plus tracées. Elles n'apparaiseent plus sur la heatmap Strava winter (cumul de 2 années d'activité). Cdlt, Jules
yvecai (2021-03-25 21:42:14+00:00): Ça vaut peut-être le coût de demander à l'exploitant, les pistes plus basses sont souvent justes tracées pour les vacances de février quand il y a de la neige. Je me renseignerai.
yvecai (2021-03-26 05:52:34+00:00): Voici le résultat de l'enquête, photos du damage en prime:
https://www.visorando.ch/randonnee-la-combe-dijon-en-ski-de-fond/
Tout le monde n'utilise pas Strava :-) 
Bonne journée, 
Yves
yvecai (2021-04-07 08:09:46+00:00): Pas de réponse de la Mairie de Nanchez ni du centre du Duchet, donc effectivement, probablement plus tracées.
Salutations,
Yves
JJBike (2021-04-07 08:24:23+00:00): Merci Yves pour le suivi
Pikse (2023-02-15 08:37:46+00:00): "Kõrgejärve" on siin tegelikult maaüksuse või talu nimi, mitte külgneva paisjärve nimi. Paisjärvel on vist pole nime.
chris66 (2025-03-30 16:54:21+00:00): Gibts das noch?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8559538542
ma_tam (2021-04-05 05:43:35+00:00): Hi JV Dilla,
I found a deleted highway way 768635741
 which is the missing connectivity b/w node 2497269489, node 371270368. Kindly refer to the changeset of the corrected data https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102301673

Thanks
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101701429
Piskvor (2021-03-25 12:40:59+00:00): Hello, if this is residential, what is the street name? (Looks like it should be a part of Kusého, but can't tell without OTG survey)

Also, if you have been there physically, could you provide the surface? Possibly it's asphalt, but again, hard to tell from ortophoto.

Btw for the city of Prague, there's a much more precise ortophoto available: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:%C4%8Cesko/freemap#Ortofotomapy_IPR_Praha
Piskvor (2021-03-25 12:43:19+00:00): Also, is there a reason you're toggling this specific way back and forth between residential and unclassified?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23607953/history
Bolt006 (2021-03-26 14:21:55+00:00): Hi Piskvor,

Thank you for investigating. While I was panning around the area, this particular way (way 23607953) seemed to be incorrectly labeled as unclassified. Hence, I changed the classification to ‘residential’ for consistency in the data. Regarding the surface tag, it wasn’t clear through the satellite imagery and hence erred on the side on not adding it.

Also, we so that there is no requirement for residential roads to have a street name according to Czech local tagging guidelines(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Map_Features#Pozemn.C3.AD_komunikace_.28Highway.29)

About the Imagery we tried the link you suggested, seems like there are no layers in the WMS link suggest in the wiki page.
Please suggest

Regarding the toggling of the classification, when I first changed the classification to residential from unclassified there was a tag named “created_by Potlatch 0.8a”  which I assumed got deleted after my edit, so I reverted the changeset, later I got to know that tag goes away when we make an edit, so I changed the classification back to residential.