piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-25 20:41:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:25:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:34:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:51:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:18:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:48:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:45:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:05:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:31:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
tonyf1 (2017-04-19 04:26:26+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OSM. I have deleted a path which is not on the satellite image, please only map real features
mavl (2018-12-25 20:43:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
tonyf1 (2017-04-19 03:12:40+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OSM. I have deleted a path which is not on the satellite image, please only map real features.
Warin61 (2017-04-19 23:00:19+00:00): Relationship 7165413 residential has touching rings ... if you look at the LPI Base map you can remove the touching.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-18 04:52:54+00:00): Found our that "imeeperezveedor" is working at Batangas City's City Planning and Development Office, and make her aware of her mapping activity. Thanks for cleaning up the data, but please view the buildings history touched by her edits, find the previous name before it was changed (does not include intermediate edits), then restore it.
schadow1 (2017-04-18 05:30:01+00:00): I dont have any contacts in Batangas City LGU and was not able to meet them personally, so I guess the only way to contact the editor is through the discussion field.
I'm currently working on a way to automate the fix as we speak. My previous automation only singled out those that have a name and landuse attribute of "commercial" and "residential" that is in a building with a shop or amenity attribute. And then manually reverted those that previously have a valid name tag that is a building and shop/amenity.
schadow1 (2017-04-18 06:25:46+00:00): should be fixed now. found about 7 buildings with valid names in history and reverted them. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47893705
wambacher (2019-08-03 11:30:34+00:00): Hi,
thanks for adding the AL5 Boundaries to Tunesia. But there is an error, which i can't fix.

Two AL5 do overlap: https://wambachers-osm.website/images/osm/snaps_2019/tunesia_al5.png
see the darker area in the center.

would be happy if you got the time to fix this - or just tell me what is correct. i'll do it for you.

regards
walter, Germany
tonyf1 (2017-04-19 03:36:03+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OSM. I have deleted a path which is not on the satellite image, please only map real features
tonyf1 (2017-04-19 03:38:08+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OSM. I have deleted a path which is not on the satellite image, please only map real features
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
Palolo (2019-08-07 15:21:18+00:00): The tourism=camp_site in Dire Dawa appears to be a Bajaj stop. Would you fix the tags please?
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
tonyf1 (2017-04-18 07:49:40+00:00): Hi. You appear to be creating paths that are not in the satellite images. Please only add things that are really there. If you have some source for your edit its good to mention it in your changeset comment.
tonyf1 (2017-04-19 03:47:22+00:00): I have deleted a path which is not on the satellite image.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
EivindWAA (2017-04-18 08:26:16+00:00): Hi Stella Lee, if island/islets are taged whit source Kartverket, and username has _import please do not aligned the island/islet by bing maps, as the island probably are imported from official data deliverd from map authorities here in Norway. bing has many miss aligned images here :( have a look here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps#Precision

and if you want to help improve the map in norway please read the wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway

and

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/N50_import_(Norway)

regards
Eivind
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:43:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-30 15:42:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52514829 where the changeset comment is: Revert and redact edits by user mamchut (now deleted) that were sourced from Bayernatlas
nevw (2017-04-18 08:40:21+00:00): Hi 
I noticed that the park is named "Dunstan Drive Park" but the street is named Dunstan Court.
Are the names correct?
nevw (2017-05-01 06:25:18+00:00): Renamed Dunstan Court to Dunstan Drive after survey.
nevw (2017-04-18 09:15:48+00:00): Hi
I noticed you changed the tagging for the Moreton Bay Cycleway from highway=cycleway to highway=footway.
The convention is to tag cycleways as highway=cycleway. The cycleway has cycleway signs along it's length. The tag foot=yes indicates that it is also for pedestrian use. Pedestrians can also use cycleways in all but rare cases where it will be signed otherwise.
Cycleways are tagged as highway=cycleway so that routing applications can correctly route the cyclists. On cycleways, cyclists will give way to pedestrians. It is also important that pedestrians note they are on a cycleway and to be aware.
emvee (2017-04-19 16:21:15+00:00): Hi Kiekin,

Thanks for adding addition details to Filmpark Babelsberg.

One note: When creating relations, the tags should not be on the outer way, but on the relation itself, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon#Verwendung and http://area.jochentopf.com/old-style-josm.html

Martin.

NB: No problem, just a hint.
Mirecnet (2017-04-18 08:59:04+00:00): Dakujem za opravu oblasti vo Velkej Fatre. Vymazal som omylom multipolygon lesa . Stalo sa to nedopatrenim pri mazani neexistujucich luk, ktore boli po osobnom prieskume len rubaniska.
Matthew Darwin (2017-10-11 14:55:58+00:00): Also this street had a name change, but addresses not updated.  Done
eggie (2017-04-18 07:41:58+00:00): reverted due to vandalism
eggie (2017-04-18 07:54:25+00:00): Je vernielt een kaart waar mensen heel veel werk aan hebben gehad. De kaart wordt wereldwijd gebruikt door officiële instanties. Van hulporganisaties tot overheidsinstanties. 
Op het vernielen van een database al dan niet bewust staat een behoorlijke sanctie.
eggie (2017-04-18 08:25:48+00:00): Er isst offiziell gewarnt. Bitte Achtung. Macht von Strassen Eisenbahnstrecken.
eggie (2017-04-18 07:40:50+00:00): revert due to vandalism
eggie (2017-04-18 07:44:37+00:00): Erik
Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. 
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group


http://www.wetrecht.nl/vernieling/

OSM
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-13 07:44:26+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3264969 ?
Commodoortje (2017-04-18 07:41:59+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Alecs01 (2017-04-22 17:26:04+00:00): Please do not add personal data to the map, thanks
kreuzschnabel (2017-06-14 09:25:52+00:00): Führen die Wanderwege (E1 etc.) jetzt über die Behelfsbrücke? Ich hab’s mal angenommen und die Relationen angepasst. Die Brücke scheint mir merkwürdig getaggt – nur Fußgänger dürfen sie benutzen, Radfahrer müssen schieben, aber dennoch Einbahnregelung?
kreuzschnabel (2017-06-14 09:36:30+00:00): Sehe gerade auf mapillary (vom 29.5.17), dass die Straße einbahnig mit Pkw befahrbar ist. Ich ändere das dann mal, denn derzeit ist sie laut Tagging für Kfz komplett gesperrt. Gibt es Beschränkungen wie z.B. Lkw-Verbot oder Höchstmasse?
kreuzschnabel (2017-06-14 09:40:53+00:00): LKW-Verbot eingebaut, ist auf einem vorigen Bild auf Mapillary zu sehen.
eggie (2017-04-18 08:30:01+00:00): En waar is de landuse?
eggie (2018-03-26 12:33:36+00:00): landuse weer hersteld.
SomeoneElse (2017-04-18 11:57:34+00:00): Hello,
As explained previously (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44699065 ) Bing imagery may be out of date or offset.  Can you explain what steps that you took here and in your other changesets in order ensure that this was not a problem?
Best Regards,
Andy
Kate Diaz (2017-04-19 01:28:26+00:00): Hi Andy,
Thanks for the comment. Do you have any resources that indicate that Bing is offset here or that the island has changed? 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47895813 
I believe that the island now better reflects reality due to my edits and that these changes improve the map incrementally. 
Thanks again,
Kate
TheSwavu (2017-04-19 03:13:47+00:00): Bing imagery in this area is off by 4 to 5 m.
SomeoneElse (2017-04-19 07:39:54+00:00): Re "resources that indicate that Bing is offset here" I'd offer "experience".
Various things can be used to determine a Bing offset - underlying GPS traces and other imagery layers among them.  I've certainly used the AGRI imagery together with GPS traces (my own and others) in WA to help align the more detailed Bing imagery.
The problem with detailed mapping based on poor input is something that looks right, but is entirely in the wrong place - and that makes it really difficult for future OSM mappers to correct (that's my experience based on early well-intentioned over-detailed mapping in OSM in the UK).
You seem (as suggested by http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Kate%20Diaz/history ) to be mapping prolifically worldwide and there have been problems highlighted by other mappers worldwide (see http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=4803527 ).  What I'd suggest instead is that you concentrate on mapping in your local area first, and where there are verifiable imagery sources.
Finally, it's definitely worth reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Imagery_Offset_Database which explains how imagery offsets can be stored and used.  It's not the complete answer though, as imagery offsets can change over very short distances, especially in hilly areas.
eggie (2017-04-18 08:32:43+00:00): Een park moet je helemaal losleggen op de landuse. Dus nergens aan vastplakken svp
eggie (2017-04-18 08:34:57+00:00): Wilco...Deze is helemaal prima zo te zien.
schadow1 (2017-04-19 04:32:32+00:00): Please tag commercial buildings as "building=commercial" instead of tagging the specific building with a name=commercial and landuse=commercial. The OSMPH has already been exerting effort to correct the updates made.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2017-April/006078.html
 Please don't get us wrong. Your inputs as part of the Batangas City LGU making these updates are valuable. But please utilize OSM standards so they can be rendered and utilized correctly.
Please use this guide for tagging buildings http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
Virgile1994 (2017-04-18 09:54:22+00:00): Salut !

Sans vouloir t'offenser, n'as-tu pas vu que ça avait déjà été fait ? D'autant plus qu'il y a quelques erreurs dans tes modifs, notamment, le BD Agutte Sembat est sensé être fermé à la circulation dès la rue Hoche.
Nous avions préparé les modifications via des discussion sur la liste de discussion locale et une page sur le wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Grenoble_groupe_local/CVCM_Grenoble). Les modifications avaient été faites hier soir, et nous attendions de voir comment se passe la mise en service et les reports de trafics pour ajuster la classification routière.

Librement, Virgile.
Loybilu (2017-04-18 10:07:36+00:00): Mouis, et le segment du Cours Berriat devrait voire son trafic diminuer (à vérifier à l'usage certes) mais clairement passer à secondary pour une voie à sens unique limitée à 30kmh c'est excessif à ce stade.

De même pour le quai Créqui : si il n'était pas secondary auparavant il n'a aucune raison de l'avoir désormais alors que son trafic ne peut que diminuer avec la part de report sur Jean-Jaurès.

Bref, à moins d'une proposition un peu plus constructive je plaiderais pour un revert.
Virgile1994 (2017-04-18 10:38:33+00:00): L'extrémité du quai Créqui était avant en secondary du fait du débouché du BD Ray. Je l'ai déclassée en tertiary (comme le reste du quai) en même temps que j'ai passé l'axe Agutte Sembat en unclasified.
geri-oc (2017-04-19 13:47:15+00:00): im Forum wurde es aber anders empfohlen:
(access=yes - warum?)

amenity=bicycle_parking
bicycle_parking=stands
stands=rhein-ruhr_stirup

(capacity=4
covered=no
lit=yes
surface=paving_stones)
eggie (2017-04-18 08:39:39+00:00): Maar waar is de landuse? Het is weer allemaal park?
Park op park?
eggie (2017-04-18 08:41:22+00:00): PB gestuurd
eggie (2017-04-18 10:35:41+00:00): reverted op verzoek
richlv (2017-04-18 09:46:47+00:00): the "Ezera vārti" memorial, what is that and where exactly is it located ? at the current location, nothing of interest can be seen on the mapillary imagery.

could you please take images (see www.mapillary.com for detail), upload them and share the link here ?
SafwatHalaby (2017-04-18 17:04:58+00:00): Hi. Would you mind explaining the deletion of 226615133. It doesn't seem right, though I'm not sure. Did you remove the forest?
SafwatHalaby (2017-04-18 17:07:27+00:00): On further inspection: It appears you removed a big forest (which I know is there by local knowledge) and replaced it with several chunks of smaller forests. Could you explain?
valleyofdawn (2017-04-18 17:39:16+00:00): The big forest was very crude. It covers forested and bare land. The smaller ones were hiding beneath it. These were imported from kkl data. It's time now to 
 complete the missing forest patches individually.
XaMi (2017-05-08 21:26:58+00:00): Based on which source did you change the position of the links in the area of the new bridge? I've tracked the ways with an etrex 20 and partly got a different position  (indeed the tracked ways are nearer to the actual position than to the position before your change)
Bobmarek (2017-05-09 16:53:07+00:00): I used a tracking App on Android. But I'm sure the etrex 20 is more precise.
XaMi (2017-05-15 23:24:13+00:00): Thanks for your reply. I've moved the motorway links according to my track.
EivindWAA (2017-04-18 08:45:00+00:00): Hi Eva  if island/islets are taged whit source Kartverket, and username has _import please do not aligned the island/islet by bing maps, as the island probably are imported from official data deliverd from map authorities here in Norway. bing has many miss aligned images here :( have a look here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing_Maps#Precision

and if you want to help improve the map in norway please read the wiki

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Topography_import_for_Norway

and

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/N50_import_(Norway)

regards
Eivind
eggie (2017-04-18 10:01:59+00:00): reverted persoonlijke notes niet toegestaan
eggie (2017-04-18 10:10:34+00:00): Oke Jorik.. goed bezig.. Probeer je changesets nog kleiner te houden.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47897898
Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld (2017-04-18 11:28:57+00:00): oke zal ik doen!
Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld (2017-04-18 13:40:27+00:00): Vroeg me af hoe je je nog niet geuploaden veranderingen in josm kan zien. Bv dat je alleen de wegen en nodes ziet die je hebt aangepast.
eggie (2017-04-18 14:29:24+00:00): Nee.. bij mijn weten gaat dat niet. Houd het daarom klein.
Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld (2017-04-18 19:15:26+00:00): Oke
alphensebezorger (2017-04-18 22:54:15+00:00): In JOSM kun je zoeken (Ctrl-F) op 'modified', dan worden alle aangepaste (en nieuwe) elementen geselecteerd. Soms ontdek je zo dat je per ongeluk iets hebt verschoven o.i.d. Eventueel zou je ook een filter daarvan kunnen maken, maar dat lijkt me niet echt handig.
eggie (2017-04-19 06:10:42+00:00): ahh.. bedankt.. ook weer wat geleerd.
Jorik “GingerLionXx” Seisveld (2017-04-19 12:35:19+00:00): Top!
muzirian (2019-01-05 17:35:36+00:00): noticed some pois getting duplicted where it is already taagged as area.
highflyer74 (2017-04-22 10:25:16+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, zu OSM beizutragen, kann ich Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/De%3AWikiStart) ans Herz legen.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Auch möchte ich Dich zu unserem monatlichen OSM Treffen in Bremen einladen. Informationen dazu gibt es hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Veranstaltungen

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße aus HB,

Oliver
SomeoneElse (2017-04-18 11:53:50+00:00): Hi,
A month ago someone mentioned that Bing imagery might be offset (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46862647#map=15/60.5123/28.6651&layers=N ).  Can you explain what you're doing here to avoid problems caused by offset imagery?
Best Regards,
Andy