piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
hanchao (2015-03-06 10:29:54+00:00): 道路中加入了异常点，比如长安南路。
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/200190154#map=13/31.7232/116.5401&layers=D
Nakaner (2015-03-28 12:14:54+00:00): Why did you add name="Gleis *" to every track inside the station. This is tagging for the renderer. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name I have removed these name=*. I have corrected this issue. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29804041
Adam_Piszczek (2015-03-17 18:26:45+00:00): Witam
OSM Inspector pokazuje błędy geometri
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?lon=19.5646&lat=49.6203&zoom=16
Pozdrawiam
S0Cool (2015-03-18 09:02:33+00:00): Dzięki, poprawione.
Hjart (2015-03-10 18:08:35+00:00): Her har du lagt en trappe (highway=steps) over et eksisterende stykke gangsti (highway=footway). Det er bedre at klippe gangstien på passende steder og omdefinere det stykke der skal være trappe.
*Martin* (2015-03-05 07:12:06+00:00): Ahoj Spagy

Z tvojho popisu ku zmene nevidim preco si zmazal cisla domov. Ako bol dovod?

Dakujem
Spagy (2015-03-05 16:45:07+00:00): Ahoj,
čísla domov som dával dávnejšie ja, ale to som ešte nevedel, že je potrebné dávať aj súpisné čísla. A Vyšnému Medzevu som posielal mail so žiadosťou  o sprístupnenie informácie (súpisné číslo domu, evidenčné číslo domu, názov ulice, číslo
parcely*, časť obce*) na odpoveď ešte stále čakám.
A preto som ich zmazal.
Jochen Topf (2015-03-05 07:49:04+00:00): Please, please do NOT add natural=coastline tags to inland lakes. Natural=coastline is for the sea coastline only. This has been a long-standing tagging convention and is clearly documented on the wiki. (There are only a few lakes that still have coastline tags for historical reasons.) The coastline update process is brittle and will lead to problems if there such large scale changes to the coastline. Please revert these changes.
wambacher (2015-03-07 09:18:42+00:00): Hi Jochen, 

the revert has been done (not by me)

i wanted to get those shores into your waterway-polygons but i found another solution.

regards
walter

btw: sche... Spamfilter :(
zimba (2015-03-04 16:06:58+00:00): Wie oft muss ich deine aenderungen bei diesen haeuser noch rueckgaengig machen? glaubs doch endlich, das kartenmaterial von dem du abzeichnest ist ungenau!
mausmaki (2015-03-04 17:45:43+00:00): Sag' es dem Bing-nicht mir!
zimba (2015-03-04 16:14:01+00:00): Die Bing bilder sind ungenau: das vorarlberger gemeindehaus hat perfekt gepasst
zimba (2015-03-04 16:16:55+00:00): oeffnungszeiten traegt man nicht so ein: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
zimba (2015-03-04 16:20:57+00:00): Sauber, schon wieder ein gebaude auf die falschen Bing bilder verschoben...
zimba (2015-03-04 16:22:57+00:00): und schon wieder die bing bilder
HubMiner (2018-11-11 13:38:02+00:00): Hi wegerje, did you add "guess" in the trail name? Are you still actively working on this? Should we move this to  "fixme"?  

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331243455/history

Overpass: http://overpass-api.de/api/convert?data=%2F*%0AThis%20has%20been%20generated%20by%20the%20overpass-turbo%20wizard.%0AThe%20original%20search%20was%3A%0A%E2%80%9Chighway%3Dfootway%20and%20name~%2Fguess%2F%E2%80%9D%0A*%2F%0A%5Bout%3Ajson%5D%5Btimeout%3A500%5D%3B%0A%2F%2F%20gather%20results%0A(%0A%20%20%2F%2F%20query%20part%20for%3A%20%E2%80%9Chighway%3Dfootway%20and%20name~guess%E2%80%9D%0A%20%20node%5B%22highway%22%3D%22footway%22%5D%5B%22name%22~%22guess%22%5D(37.3319485736073%2C-89.27627563476562%2C37.82009043941308%2C-88.47702026367186)%3B%0A%20%20way%5B%22highway%22%3D%22footway%22%5D%5B%22name%22~%22guess%22%5D(37.3319485736073%2C-89.27627563476562%2C37.82009043941308%2C-88.47702026367186)%3B%0A%20%20relation%5B%22highway%22%3D%22footway%22%5D%5B%22name%22~%22guess%22%5D(37.3319485736073%2C-89.27627563476562%2C37.82009043941308%2C-88.47702026367186)%3B%0A)%3B%0A%2F%2F%20print%20results%0Aout%20body%3B%0A%3E%3B%0Aout%20skel%20qt%3B&target=mapql
wegerje (2018-11-15 03:47:58+00:00): Hi HubMiner. Three years ago I was even more unsophisticated than I am now. Since I am essentially self taught as concerns Open Street Map I know very little of the social conventions that help make it work.

At that time I figured "guess" in the name would serve to authorize anyone with more knowledge to act.

I have used "fixme" a little these days but not with any full sense of understanding.

So yes move "guess" to "fixme".
And No I am not active on the River to River Trail relations and do not expect to return to it. 

Thank you for educating me.
HubMiner (2019-02-19 06:37:47+00:00): Hi wegerje, sorry it took me long time to come back.  

River to River Trail relation seems to be fully mapped: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4645742  

I guess I will start taking out trail names (where is contains guess).  Since the trail is (presumably) fully mapped, I don't think we need "fixme" either.  Sounds reasonable?

I like your trail section number and I am hesitant to wipe it out, but I assume that was just a private sequential number, not based on any map or any signs?

Thanks!
wegerje (2019-02-19 15:31:23+00:00): I use WaymarkedTrails ( https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=4645742 ) to view the results of my work. The number in the segment keeps them logically sequential in the list that Waymarked trails generates. In that sense the segment numbers are useful. (That is what you mean by "section" numbers, yes?)

For the Continental Divide Trail (CDT) I felt the section (segment) numbers were also important to present the sections in top down alphabetic order to match the geographic North-South order of the trail.

But yes in both cases it is my own private ordering not based on anything else in the world.

For the River to River trail I went East to West since it seems most people hike it in that direction.

And Thank you.
HubMiner (2019-02-20 04:21:50+00:00): Hi wegerje, your approach makes perfect sense, although it contradicts OSM rules. :)
(In some undetermined future) I'll start scrubbing the name.  Thanks for your help, and good luck with future hikes - they sounds very impressive!
wegerje (2019-02-24 17:35:15+00:00): So educate me please. Point me to the rule book :) etc.

Is there an "official body" in charge of naming River to River sections? Or are you referring to the specific segment names like "guess".

I imagine that there are many stakeholders that depend upon OSM. Hikers themselves should be one of them I would think. But sure if hikers are using apps then app makers needs and desires would come ahead of hikers themselves and their direct interaction with OSM. Something like that.
emacsen (2015-03-04 21:13:08+00:00): Hi,

I see that this is your first day editing OSM. Most of your edits are good, but you created an object, node 3382963007 which is named "My Apartment". Unless the name of the building is really "My Apartment", then this should be changed.
Josh D'Ambrosio (2015-03-04 22:28:31+00:00): Professr,

I am having trouble changing it without creating a new change set. Is there a way to do this? I tried a few different ways but can't seem to figure it out.
emacsen (2015-03-04 22:29:21+00:00): Making a new changeset isn't a problem. Changesets close after a set time, so it's fine to just make a new one.
Josh D'Ambrosio (2015-03-04 22:30:42+00:00): Oh okay, I see. Thank you very much.
JLZIMMERMANN (2015-06-11 16:44:27+00:00): Bonjour,
Ce groupe de modification pose problème car le bâtiment Intermartché a déjà été importé et est mieux qualifié.
Gumeg (2015-08-25 21:13:00+00:00): А почему Гелиос перестал быть зданием? Это не верно.
NetWormKido (2020-03-30 04:57:10+00:00): По свежему снимку мост на месте
Durko_freemap (2015-03-05 12:44:09+00:00): Zdravim anirud, to ocislovanie som trochu upravil.
baranc3k (2015-05-07 06:44:42+00:00): Hi,
way 297631487 has equal two nodes (1st, 3rd) : node=3382813246.
Can you fix it?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
Saeidjan (2015-04-05 09:09:52+00:00): مدرسه 22 بهمن
dudka (2015-03-05 08:49:39+00:00): Please don't add highway=pedestrian for the Square. It is not fully pedestrian, it contains buildings, monuments, grass areas that are clearly not pedestrian
jeawrong (2015-03-05 10:09:24+00:00): you're right, it would be better a report that excludes buildings, grass and other pedestrian area. It's a work a bit complex, but would certainly better idea
jeawrong (2015-03-05 10:54:31+00:00): a relatin, not a report ... google translation
bluemonki (2015-03-04 17:28:21+00:00): added a post box
AgentKamenski (2019-10-21 16:47:44+00:00): Building needs a officer from FBI cybercrimes to inspect the property and the Comcast Xfinity wifi open networks
freebeer (2019-10-21 17:47:03+00:00): so what's wrong about open WLAN networks?  i'm operating one right now with a foreign client connected to it.

please to be enlightening me.
Durko_freemap (2015-03-05 13:03:37+00:00): Zdravim papuch, na tuto cestu si dal maxspeed=80km/h(dufam ze plati v oboch smeroch) + si pridal bod s 90tkou a 70tkou, kedze si neurcil smer tak kto ma vediet na ktoru stranu aka rychlost plati? Treba to rozumne opravit/upravit.
Durko_freemap (2015-03-05 12:30:35+00:00): Nazdar papuch, viem ze si to vymazal ale mohol si to len zamenit za cislo budovy :o) ked si tam uz mal bod.
GerdP (2015-12-12 06:15:39+00:00): Hi there!
The tag highway=plaza was only used here, and if I got that right, there is really no way to walk around the garden on this way.
So I think landuse=plaza is enough.
See my changes
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35902532
*Martin* (2021-12-25 11:56:01+00:00): Ahoj.

Uradna tabula sa taguje takto:
tourism=information
information=board
board_type=notice
(name=... sa nedava)

Ty si to otagoval ako turisticke informacne centrum s nazvom "Úradná tabuľa":
tourism=information
information=office
name=Úradná tabuľa

(https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3364709634)

Opravil som.
jotpe (2015-03-05 19:40:13+00:00): Dann kann der ja wohl weg oder ? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1673071166
Morten Lange (2015-11-03 15:10:22+00:00): Hi are those really 4 bicycel repair stations ? 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_repair_station
 Could they be bicycle repair shops instead, as they are placed inside houses ? 
Hilsen Morten (Kan svare på norsk)
emacsen (2015-03-05 14:48:05+00:00): Hi and congrats for making your first edit to OSM!

It looks like you edited 53rd and made a blank area. I've deleted the blank area because it looked like a mistake. What was your edit to West 53rd about?
sorcrosc (2015-03-05 21:53:53+00:00): I percorsi che inserisci esistono davvero? Alcuni non si vedono, sembrano solo i contorni dei campi. Forse solo la traccia di qualche cacciatore che ci è passato?

Inoltre fai attenzione alla classificazione: highway=footway è un tag che di solito si usa per i marciapiedi in città. Per i sentieri si usa highway=path

Leggi per bene qui:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway

Ciao
trottomv (2015-03-05 21:58:51+00:00): sono sentieri, alcuni a bordo dei campo i su carreggiate dei mezzi agricoli, probabilmente ho sbagliato il tag
Luchinobr (2015-03-14 18:47:17+00:00): ottimo consiglio! Matti correggi i tag all'inizio è così per tutti
buon lavoro! domani ne provo uno
dudka (2015-03-05 08:53:33+00:00): you should probably rename way http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/191255341 too
robert (2015-03-08 14:01:56+00:00): Did you mean to end up removing the name "Runnymede Close" in this edit? It's broken a match against Ordnance Survey Locator: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=868564
John Embrey (2015-03-08 17:54:54+00:00): No; any removal of name was an accidental mistake.
robert (2015-03-09 19:36:49+00:00): Ok I've fixed it now.
robert (2015-03-09 19:37:10+00:00): (in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29369615)
jlevente (2018-05-07 14:59:06+00:00): szia, kicsit regi a changeset, de emlekszel meg, hogy a rokusi krt eszaki oldalan levu epuleteken az addr:housename az honnan van (pl. "205-os epulet" itt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331295206)? valami IKV nyilvantartas, vagy hasonlo? probaltam rajonni, de hazszamokhoz nem igazan kotodnek, meg nem remlik, hogy valaki is igy hivna ezeket az epuleteket.
muralito (2015-03-23 13:28:29+00:00): No abreviar.
MajorTom2GroundControl (2015-03-11 21:59:30+00:00): Why did you change my edit of Perkins Lane. It is shown incorrectly in every online map. 

I fixed it and you messed it up again. I'm on Perkins Lane daily.
jotpe (2015-03-05 19:42:30+00:00): Vielleicht als geschlossen oder so taggen?
BrunoC (2015-05-04 08:08:37+00:00): Bonjour,
Je crois qu'il y a un souci sur la limite administrative "dans l'eau".
A+
Bruno
Marcussacapuces91 (2015-05-04 11:26:24+00:00): Yep, peux-tu décrire le "soucis" ?
Les contours sont tirés de "coastline/mapbox" ou de "PGS" : c'est pas moi qui les ai fait. Maintenant s'il faut fire un import cadastre des contours commune, ben...
BrunoC (2015-05-06 09:29:56+00:00): Le soucis c'est le way 331301704 en admin level 2 et boundary=administrative. Déjà c'est moche sur le rendu, plus que d'habitude, et c'est ce qui m'a attiré l'oeil.
Il me semblait qu'il y avait un concensus sur la facon de mapper les limites communales en bord de mer : limite portée par le trait de cote (les données du cadastre étant tout à fait farfelues sur le littoral), ce trait de côte étant tagué avec coastline uniquement, les tags administratifs étant portés par la relation.

Le problème c'est qu'il faudrai supprimer ce chemin d'OSM, mais aussi le remplacer par le trait de côte dans les 10 relations administratives qui l'utilisent! Je peux le faire si tu le souhaites.
Marcussacapuces91 (2015-05-06 09:50:05+00:00): J'ai effectivement fait un import cadastre du contour de la commune, en distinguant bien admin de coastline et... en ignorant ce consensus. Je n'ai aucune réserve à ce que tu corriges :-)
Darek-J (2015-03-05 13:45:43+00:00): Dlaczego adres Kiedrzyńska 87 przeniosłeś na parking i w dodatku połączyłeś go ze strukturą tego parkingu? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2183510235
Weide (2015-03-06 08:02:03+00:00): Bitte keine Steignummern in den Namen stecken. Die Routen funktionieren dann nicht mehr richtig. Steignummern können in local_ref (werden dann in der Standardkarte angezeigt). Man kann sie auch in ref packen, das ist aber mehrdeutig.
Nix für ungut.
Weide
Protoxenus (2018-01-04 18:40:06+00:00): Hallo, heißt die Brücke wirklich "Pfeilerlose Bogenbrücke" oder ist das eine pfeilerlose Bogenbrücke?
Im zweiten Fall wäre das eine description:de und kein Name.
Gruß Protoxenus
M_H (2018-01-04 18:56:57+00:00): Sorry, das ist eine Pfeilerlose Bogenbrücke, die heißt nicht so. Pfeilerlos ist die Brücke weil auf diesem Teil der "Reichsautobahn" Geschwindigskeitrekorde gefahren werden sollten. Ich ändere das.
Gruß M_H
frosm (2017-12-01 18:17:01+00:00): Bonjour,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60348080/history
vous souvenez-vous pq vous l'avez appellé chemin puis rue en utilisant les 2 fois bano comme source ?
D'après bano cela ne peux avoir qu'un nom :) et il me semble que c'est chemin
http://tile.openstreetmap.fr/~cquest/leaflet/bano.html#18/49.40226/1.13144
kartler175 (2017-06-09 21:34:11+00:00): Ein Ort voller Parkplätze, die eigentlich gar keine sind, sondern gewöhnliche Hofflächen.
Barol (2015-03-09 13:18:42+00:00): Ottima eliminazione.
Ora i prossimi bikers avventurosi non incorreranno in rovi e ramaglia in genere.
Ruying (2015-03-04 22:30:18+00:00): water
Cascafico (2015-03-05 09:39:37+00:00): Ciao,
cos'è quest'area?
SomeoneElse (2015-03-15 11:32:01+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  
I just noticed http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331316420 - it seems not to have a main tag on it.  If it's a fence, I'd expect it to be a "barrier=fence" (and not to have a name - fences tend not to have).  Or is it the building of a cmpany that makes electric fences?
FTA_dwg_archived (2015-03-07 04:14:19+00:00): Hi there, I noticed you made these edits but did not list a source. Could you please elaborate on where you obtained this information? I cannot seem to discern any of these features on Bing imagery.
wambacher (2015-03-07 09:31:31+00:00): article public newsletter (SPIEGEL) some days.

it's gone (in newsletter and osm)

regards
walter
FTA_dwg_archived (2015-03-11 20:56:42+00:00): Hi Walter,
Thanks for getting back to me...it is greatly appreciated. Unfortunately, an article on Spiegel Online is not an OSM-compatible source to derive data from. Unless you refer to a different Spiegel, these changes will have to be redacted. Please see http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Contributor_Terms_Summary for more information.
wambacher (2015-03-12 10:00:21+00:00): Hi,

you did not realize that i reverted (removed, redacted, zurückgenommen, ...) my edit 5 days ago?

Regards
walter
alexfriant (2015-03-05 22:17:04+00:00): Nice!  Thanks for coming to the meetup last night!
217541OSM (2018-10-23 06:52:30+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3383902412#map=19/37.13358/-121.64032

There's really a fire extinguisher outside on the street?
woodpeck (2015-03-06 06:51:29+00:00): This mechanical edit claims to correct for a problem with an ID preset, yet many of the objects being corrected are not contributed using ID but with "osmsync:dero" - maybe that needs fixing as well?
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-06 06:55:05+00:00): The first run of osmsync:dero had the problem also, it is now fixed.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-06 06:58:21+00:00): There's a mix.

Here's an iD changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29168107

The iD preset is still wrong.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-06 07:02:01+00:00): It was my typo: "chaintool" vs. "chain_tool".  Someone pointed it out just after the presets were finalized... so I'm fixing it now.
Otnow (2015-03-05 10:12:03+00:00): Судя по wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=wadi тэг waterway=wadi не рекомендуется использовать, вместо него лучше waterway=river + intermittent=yes
Michel-nk (2015-03-05 10:52:55+00:00): Вот-жеж... В русскоязычном варианте по wadi вообще ничего не было, я и поставил. Щаз поправлю.
*Martin* (2015-05-20 19:39:05+00:00): Durko, tu si asi bol asi este novacik ze si dal nazov ihrisku "Futbalove ihrisko" :-). Opravim. Aj ten surovy tvar.
Durko_freemap (2015-05-21 06:29:21+00:00): Ahoj Martin, kedysi v zaciatkoch som to tak videl otagovane, tak to robim rovnako, raz tie "name" vsetky vymazem ak nebudem vediet originalne meno klubu.
Xmypblu (2015-03-06 15:02:42+00:00): не используй name, для всего есть свои теги
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Как_обозначить#.D0.A8
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=2094
KKS (2017-11-13 22:22:27+00:00): Привіт, і як з великої землі до "Дубини" дістатись?
olehz (2017-11-14 09:49:40+00:00): в брід камазом чи уазіком, коли дощів нема + пішохідний міст є (хоча і їх періодично змиває). фактично це острів. як мінімум з точки зору дорожнього графу
KKS (2017-11-14 13:28:40+00:00): саме про нього й мова, але дивно що є незатоплбвані дороги до Довгого і Підгородці , а накату на них просто нема. Дивно що люди хочуть то все в брід штурмувати, коли є нормальна дорога в об'їзд
olehz (2017-11-14 13:42:50+00:00): нічого дивного. у більшості селян нема власних авто - вони і не дуже потрібні враховуючи якість місцевих доріг. а трактору чи камазу швидше в брід переїхати (там глибина по коліно)
parukhin (2018-05-13 22:16:53+00:00): Коллега, подскажите, а в чём смысл замены tower на pole у ВЛ 220 кВ?
К примеру https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3125590389
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-06 11:32:03+00:00): Kolego! Powinieneś dostać po uszach. Dlaczego? Zmieniłeś nazwę ulicy w Jarosławiu na 3-go Maja. Jest to forma niepoprawna ortograficznie, jak również niezgodna z ustalonymi zasadami OSM. Proszę sie zapoznać i nie psuć więcej: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-06 16:32:46+00:00): Proszę kontynuować dyskusję tam, gdzie została ona zaczęta.
Napisałeś: "Hej! Nie bądź taki pewny swego! Zmieniłem nazwę ulicy na "3-go Maja", bo taka jest w uchwale Rady Miasta. I zgoda - jest to forma niepoprawna ortograficznie, ale dopóki Rada nie zmieni tego zapisu, tylko taka jest prawidłowa. Dowód: http://ulice.jaroslaw.pl/uchwaly/docs/012_III2088.pdf

ps. Poprawiłem większość nazw ulic w Jarosławiu zgodnie z zapisami uchwał, oraz przebieg ulic na zgodny z operatem nazewnictwa ulic który prowadzi Urząd Miasta."

Odpowiadam - OSM to nie jest miejsce do powielania błędów powstałych w głowach radnych. Wszelkie zmiany polegające na wprowadzaniu niezgodnych z zasadami OSM zmian zostaną wycofane.
bif1 (2015-03-06 17:58:13+00:00): hahaha! Rada Miasta tworzy prawo miejscowe i jeśli nazwie ulicę 3-gogo maJAA to tak się nazywa i już. W Jarosławiu nie ma ulicy 3 Maja.
Ale ok, rozumiem, czytałem trochę instrukcji. Społeczność OSM ma swoje "zasady" z którymi się nie zgadzam, więc nie będę więcej uczestniczył w tym przedsięwzięciu. 
Pa!
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-06 20:04:30+00:00): Nie ma przymusu uczestniczenia :-)
Miłego dnia życzę :-)
deleted_account (2015-03-06 21:16:16+00:00): Cześć bif1, wstępując do projektu który nie znasz powinieneś najpierw zapoznać się z zasadami tutaj panującymi, dostałeś porady od doświadczonego Mapowicza ktory wie co mówi i i ma na uwadze jedynie dobro OSM - jakość danych w nim obecnych. Jak emocje opadną postaraj się ponownie rozważyć swoją decyzję i nie odchodzić od najlepszej mapy świata. Pozdrawiam
Xmypblu (2015-03-06 15:06:54+00:00): отметь правильно
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Как_обозначить
тогда фирма попадет в свою категорию в каталог "Точки интереса (POI) " на http://openstreetmap.ru и не только
Dhau (2020-07-15 14:47:27+00:00): Hallo highflyer74,

du jammerst offenbar gern über anderer Leute Edits.
Weiß du, dass dein schöner Edit (=dieser) komplett revertiert wurde:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29303159

Gern geschehen,
Peter Dhau
highflyer74 (2020-07-15 15:23:18+00:00): Hallo Peter Dhau!

ich weiss nicht, was Dich zu der Bemerkung, ich würde über anderer Leute Edits "jammern" bringt. Meine CS-Kommentare sind öffentlich einsehbar und fundiert, da ich regelmässig QS betreibe und mich überdurchschnittlich viel mit OSM beschäftige. Aber anscheinend bin ich Dir mal auf den Schlips getreten, so dass Du extra einen neuen Account anlegen musstest, um mir dies mitzuteilen, was Dich charakterlich recht traurig aussehen lässt.

Um so mehr wird es Dich erstaunen, dass der Revert dieses CS in gegenseitigem Einvernehmen geschah, da mein Edit totaler Bullshit war, was ich aber als damaliger OSM-Neuling nicht wusste, bevor es mir jemand erklärt hat.

Insofern danke ich Dir für den etwas verspäteten Hinweis und hoffe, dass Du trotzdem einen schönen Abend hast!
Arnaud TAILFER (2015-03-05 12:01:44+00:00): Recentrage du nom de la commune sur la Mairie
Xmypblu (2015-03-06 15:11:26+00:00): исправь обратно, с чего у тебя в "name:ru" английское название перенесено?
hadw (2017-02-26 15:57:28+00:00): Is the masjid really called just Masjid and only named in English?  If you don't know the correct name, you should not supply a name.

Also, please include changeset outlining the details of the changeset.  Use whatever language is most comfortable for you.
ff5722 (2017-02-04 19:08:19+00:00): 这是什么特征？
t_s_m (2015-03-05 14:46:21+00:00): @Kotenänderung: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leutschach_an_der_Weinstra%C3%9Fe
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-12 07:40:30+00:00): Jakie jest źródło https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331371317 ? Czy jest to nadal aktualne?
ndmystko (2017-09-12 07:50:04+00:00): Wyłącznie dedukcja: skoro ustalono numerację to planowana jest tam droga. Innej możliwości nie widzę. Niestety, nie mam pojęcia czy to jest aktualne, nie bywam w tamtej okolicy.
dieterdreist (2015-03-10 12:45:33+00:00): this changeset seems to have created problems without adding anything useful. I have reverted this changeset.