piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
☆Finvenkulo (2020-12-24 00:07:18+00:00): Ten akwen nazywa się Morze Bałtyckie, dlaczego przywracasz błędną nazwę?
eggie (2020-12-22 16:46:41+00:00): Klopt als het oostelijk deel alleen fietsers zijn uitgezonderd en het middendeel en westelijk deel ook moped en mofa uitgezonderd is.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-12-22 16:46:57+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96270051
DeFra85 (2024-11-19 22:20:54+00:00): Ahoi, was ist denn hier los? Zwei mal die "Lutternsche Egge", nur an unterschiedlicher Stelle?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/307639371
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8237184073
Da kann doch was nicht stimmen.
!bm (2020-12-22 16:24:34+00:00): +source=Geoportal Berlin / Adressen Berlin
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96270345
plennert (2025-01-05 18:30:02+00:00): Hallo,
sicher das dieser "Wanderparkplatz" existiert?
datbrahm (2020-12-22 16:35:35+00:00): Hi,

The edit made in this Changeset is made based on the "Driver Feedback" as source.  If you are local or going for survey near this location feel free to make any changes as seen fit. Or contact in case there are any queries related to this edit.

Thanks & Regards,
Brahm Datt
danieldegroot2 (2020-12-23 13:27:49+00:00): Changed media to used media in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96274755
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-22 17:30:51+00:00): Hi Huang8, welcome to OSM.

It's a good practice to edit only local areas and not all over the world like this edit.
This update will be seen by many people all over the world!

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-22 17:34:23+00:00): Thanks!

Revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96268908
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-23 11:41:27+00:00): re: https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/kfgijk/1000_complete_on_streetcomplete/

Congratulations! Glad to hear that StreetComplete works for you :)

(I am one of contributors to this editor and it is nice to see people using it)
G1asshouse (2020-12-23 02:51:42+00:00): I noticed a few barrier=kerb tags were incorrectly added to crossing nodes which are on highway (road) ways. OSM wiki notes that the exclusion of barrier=kerb, in this specific case, is related to routing. Below are the first few that I caught but because of the size of this changeset, I did not check every node.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing (under Accessibility)
6336579560, 6336579559, 6336579558, 6336579557, 6336579556, 6336579555, 6336579554, 6336579553, 6759791272, 6759791271
manojkmohan (2020-12-22 19:21:42+00:00): Hi. can you check again the satellite image. In Bing Map its showing as vegetated area. but a river is there
G1asshouse (2020-12-23 02:51:32+00:00): I noticed a few barrier=kerb tags were incorrectly added to crossing nodes which are on highway (road) ways. OSM wiki notes that the exclusion of barrier=kerb, in this specific case, is related to routing. Below are the first few that I caught but because of the size of this changeset, I did not check every node.  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing (under Accessibility)
6045027044, 6045027043, 6044587907, 6044583364, 6000940429, 5984433410, 6242084021
cpligovka_lyft (2021-01-06 09:00:57+00:00): Hello Omnific,  
My name is Catherine and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. While mapping in the Seattle and Bellevue area, I noticed that you added multiple barrier=kerb tags there. Some of them were applied at intersections of roads and footpaths or just at roads (like there: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6252512487 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6257009782, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5981213833), which affects the routing dramatically. According to the OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb), combining  barrier=kerb tag with highway=crossing is usually not preferred. According to Mapillary streetside there are no barriers at those nodes. So could you provide any additional information that this tag should be added in these cases? If not, could you please let us revert the edits in the changeset? 
Thank you, 
Catherine
Gallizenae (2020-12-22 17:53:31+00:00): Are you mapping individual trees?
Tomas Straupis (2020-12-22 18:38:42+00:00): Nereikia papildomų vektorių kartu einantiems takams, žemėlapyje bus bardakas ir jokios naudos. Pėsčiųjų/dviračių taką galima tiesiog žymėti highway=path+bicycle=designated+foot=designated+segregated=yes|no
Pagal aprašymą čia:
https://lt.wikibooks.org/wiki/Atviro_%C5%BEem%C4%97lapio_vadovas/Redagavimas/Dvira%C4%8Diai
Ali00098 (2020-12-22 20:36:58+00:00): Hi, this user is always trying to enter incorrect information on the map. This user has already been blocked several times for entering incorrect information on the map. This user has no access to messages and does not respond to them. This region is named Mehrdasht region according to the statistical maps of Iran and Isfahan province. He is trying to put the name of his city on all the roads in the area, which is completely wrong. Please restrict and block this user so that other users' edits are not lost. Thanks to the good osm map team
Ali00098 (2020-12-27 14:46:55+00:00): What is your goal in entering the wrong information in the map?
osmviborg (2020-12-23 11:56:20+00:00): Omkørslen er lidt længer mod nord, det gør den store forskel. https://imgur.com/nYJNnjk
LarsBG (2020-12-23 16:29:45+00:00): Du må meget gerne rette til. Min mobil er ikke god til aften billeder. står der 500meter? https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/YmFnt3O14rmut3LxDIRUFq
parsd51 (2020-12-23 17:04:14+00:00): Hej

En kilde, ud over Mapillary, med angivelse, er https://trafikkort.vejdirektoratet.dk/ (zoom til Søndervig og klik vejarbejde)

Her ser det ud til at Lodbjergsvej er forlænget nordpå til 181.

Hilsen
parsd51
osmviborg (2020-12-23 18:27:30+00:00): @LarsBG. Der skulle have stået "det gør _ikke_ den store forskel".
parsd51 (2020-12-23 18:43:46+00:00): Hej

Ihht mit link ovenfor, varer arbejdet kun til 1/1-2021, og der er mulighed for simpel og kort omkørsel, så jeg ville ikke lægge det i OSM. Ellers ville jeg bruge access:conditional tagget, så der ikke er konsekvenser hvis det bliver glemt.

Hilsen
parsd51
gigio60 (2021-07-27 09:41:43+00:00): Buongiorno, l'interruzione è risolta ed il tratto è ora percorribile.
CatenaDiVoltri (2021-07-27 10:19:49+00:00): A me risulta che sia nuovamente chiusa da ieri, lunedì 26 luglio 2021 a causa di un'altra frana. Lei ha notizie più aggiornate?
CatenaDiVoltri (2021-07-28 07:48:03+00:00): Ho provveduto a rimettere come percorribile il tratto interessato dai lavori in quanto mi sono giunte notizie che effettivamente il tratto è stato riaperto, al momento lascio i due cancelli con l'indicazione oraria di apertura e chiusura.
woodpeck (2021-08-11 12:59:32+00:00): Dear ppruzina, a user of OSM has contacted DWG asking about the source of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/887609618 ("Designated Footpath 63") - is there some official source for that?
ppruzina (2021-08-11 13:18:06+00:00): Yes - it's designated as a public footpath by Ards and North Down Borough Council. I haven't checked it's existence on the ground, but it is a public right of way by law.
woodpeck (2021-08-11 13:21:59+00:00): Is there a public register of these, or could they contact the council if they wanted more information?
ppruzina (2021-08-11 13:40:13+00:00): Yes - they can contact the council - information is at https://www.ardsandnorthdown.gov.uk/resident/public-rights-of-way, with an email address above the download links near the bottom of the page. I added all the PROWs in the council area to OSM around the time of this changeset, based on information I got from the council, so the legal status is correct as of a few months ago.
divulmappeur (2020-12-22 22:02:25+00:00): Bonjour, il semble que l'opérateur de la ligne soit toujours la Régie Régionale des Transports Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur, d'après le site officiel :
https://www.cpzou.fr/qui-sommes-nous/
Pa413 (2020-12-23 08:18:18+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement je suis d'accord avec vous. Par contre la ligne est passé sous le réseau de transport régional Zou ! Après effectivement l'opérateur qui était les Chemins de Fer de Provence comme vous dites c'est effectivement la Régie Régionale des Transports Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur. Je change l'opérateur.
mirror176 (2021-12-16 08:06:40+00:00):   Are we expanding bus lane activity to its own ways now on flat streets? Thought general trend was that a continuous surface was not normally divided but rather has other tags on a single way to describe its use such as lanes:bus=* or lanes:psv=*.
  If we are, the way on the left should not be access=no as it also is dual use for other vehicles as a turn lane correct? Same scenario of usually each lane of the not physically divided road area is not individually drawn but normally done with separate tags that I've seen.
  Another question if we do this now, do we need to set all adjacent road access rules+turn restrictions to set possible valid flow paths?
OrenF (2021-01-11 14:39:15+00:00): Hey, are these roads you deleted no longer exists?
trigpoint (2021-01-11 16:12:44+00:00): This edit makes perfect sense.

The site has been under used as a car park for a number of years since the demolition of Granby Halls. It is being redeveloped as a hotel.

Cheers Phil
OrenF (2021-01-12 11:58:05+00:00): Good to know, Thanks Phil!
user_3961358 (2020-12-22 19:47:54+00:00): Can you please stop merging farmland I draw? There's different crops, so there's a reason I draw them separately. There's no guideline in the wiki saying it's bad practice.
SHARCRASH (2020-12-22 20:43:34+00:00): Indeed it's not a bad practice and yeah i can stop but the elements i merged didn't have any difference in tags. It's like if several highways with the exact same tags or hedges are side to side, it would be useless to keep them separated for nothing. In extra fields change of crop time to time (early or bi-annual), know this from farmer's methods and noticed it also thanks to the yearly photos. What i suggest you is rather to plot the complete field all together if you don't know yet the exact crop, it will be faster and later make easily the separation of the area thanks to "split area" function (plot line > alt+x). Many contributors leave so many areas fields without completing the crop difference for so many years. In the mean time the fields structure have changed, so again there is no point really.
SHARCRASH (2020-12-22 20:46:22+00:00): Correction: In the mean time the fields structure have changed, so much work done for nothing, so again there is no point really.*
user_3961358 (2020-12-22 21:30:36+00:00): I understand your point. I checked a few of the field borders with those from the official topo and found most looking the same. As in general. There are fields changing over 2-3 years but only a small portion where I've mapped so far. For me it's also mapping the size of fields in an area. Is it a huge monoculture or many small strips...
SHARCRASH (2020-12-23 12:00:43+00:00): Yeah, that's exactly what i said, they change time to time. The perimeter is not a constant either. I just found easily an example where they changed perimeter and purpose of field 5 times between 2010 and 2019 (see Geoportail.lu photos): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128482572 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/128482574 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/348401124  Hence why i don't find it relevant, neither useful, even deceiving to keep such detailed little fields separated, mostly when no more specific detailed differentiate them at all. Still i find more permanent clear to differentiate farmlands from meadows. Also OSM rule wise or of good practice, they say: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_temporary_events_and_temporary_features Clearly these fields are temporary yet we need to map them.

All in all, these arguments explain why i do this and as i already told you in the past, data wise, keep it clean, clear and without overkilling it.

I just did some merging again but residential and highways.
Shaun das Schaf (2020-12-23 11:58:15+00:00): Hallo latschingthewoods,

zwischen
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6801252575
und
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/619099435
verlaufen sowohl der Weg als auch der Pfad. Ich nehme an, dass das nicht wirklich so ist oder?

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
dvdhoven (2020-12-22 19:37:46+00:00): knooppuntnet.nl meldt een probleempje in route 24-37, stukje Kanaalweg is eenrichting. 

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hovne
A67-A67 (2020-12-22 20:58:29+00:00): Bedankt!
Ik had niet goed gekeken en dacht dat het een wandelroute was, die dus maar aan één kant van de middenberm hoeft te lopen. Ik heb het nu verbeterd.
Gallizenae (2020-12-22 19:33:06+00:00): Hi Peppe,
please rectify your new buildings by pressing Q.
kkklllppp (2020-12-22 20:54:40+00:00): Thanks
ququruzka (2020-12-23 20:57:10+00:00): додавайте вулиці виключно українською мовою. інакше, ми будемо скаржитись і вертати ваші зміни.
Дякую,
OSM UA team.
moreno96 (2020-12-22 19:53:50+00:00): سلام.
ویرایش های شما مشکلاتی از قبیل خطوط منقطع و خطوط روی هم افتاده داره.
لطفا تصحیحشون کنید این اشتباهات رو، چون ممکنه هم بلااستفاده بمونه، هم برای مصارف دیگه دیتای نقشه مشکل بوجود بیاره
ضمن اینکه بهتره دستورالعمل های مرتبط با ویرایش رو در wiki OSM مطالعه کنید
PT-53 (2020-12-30 07:54:18+00:00): Hallo  philzi,
diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/887626971/history
hat noch keine Merkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Grüße und einen Guten Rutsch
PT-53 (2021-01-10 08:27:53+00:00): Linie gelöscht.
Danke
gecho111 (2020-12-24 15:23:32+00:00): My fav tool for straightening roads is the "L" key in JOSM.  If you select a string of nodes pressing L will make a straight line of them, so you only need to align the first and last one. A huge help when alley intersections cause a road to start getting wavey.  Just have to be careful to not accidentally select building or bus stop nodes.
johnnyw03 (2020-12-24 22:01:46+00:00): Huh, that looks really handy...now only if JOSM had a tool to align a way perfectly in the cardinal directions it would be even more handy
Woidmadl (2020-12-22 22:04:51+00:00): Servus,
passt soweit. Ich habe nur noch surface, lanes, ... hinzugefügt. Busrouten sind auch angepasst. Es fehlt noch Linksabbiegerspur von Westen kommend nach dem Kreisel nach Norden zur Gärtnerei und was alles beleuchtet ist.
VG,
Woidmadl
Wegeschlenzer (2020-12-24 01:02:19+00:00): Danke für schnelle Reaktion und Ergänzungen! Hab die Linksabbiegerspur (Einfahrt Gärtnerei) eingefügt (lanes-tag ist interessant) und auch gleich die Beleuchtung der Straßen und Wege im weiteren Umfeld eingetragen. Wollt ich früher schon mal machen, aber auf später verschoben... 
Beleuchtung wurde offenbar von einigen Mappern für nicht so wichtig gehalten. 
Gruß
Wegeschlenzer
Glassman (2020-12-24 17:51:59+00:00): I went ahead and move the golf course boundary to the north side of the highway since it likely doesn't extend that far. Also removed the highway area as it doesn't add any real value. Let me know if it looks okay to you. BTW - the golf courses look great!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96278512
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-03-14 14:39:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 100992297, 100989735 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some invalid edits, mainly in Iran, following a complaint from the community there. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4814 .
szydzio (2021-01-31 12:25:55+00:00): Hej! Czy ta droga https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/887636886 faktycznie istnieje w terenie a nie tylko w danych e-mapa.net? Nie widać jej na żadnym z dostępnych podkładów zdjęciowych.
Tedi998 (2021-01-31 15:39:29+00:00): Ta droga istnieje od niedawna.
szydzio (2021-01-31 20:22:49+00:00): OK, dzięki za info, bo wpierw odniosłem wrażenie, że to było tylko skopiowanie z danych e-mapa.net, ale skoro widziałeś ją to w porządku. Zmień jedynie proszę jej kategorię - tak krótkie drogi w terenie zabudownym nie są unclassified, bo nie mają funkcji tranzytowej, raczej residential, patrz => https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce
michalfabik (2020-12-23 12:15:17+00:00): Pozdrav i dobro došao. Molim te ne popunjavaj naziv (name=*) ako kuća stvarno nema neki naziv. Naziv građevine je npr. "name=Empire State Building". Adresu je dovoljno označiti pomoću tagova "addr:street=*" i dr., kao što već jesi.  
Takođe, kada upisuješ nazive ulice (ili bilo čega drugog), treba se pridržavati pravila pravopisa, tj. "Harisa Kurtovića", velikim početnim slovima. Izvini ako ti se čini da bespotrebno cjepidlačim, ali tražiti i ispravljati ovakve greške je jako naporan posao koji zauzima jako puno vremena.
DeFra85 (2024-05-15 16:53:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8252796593

Was ist das denn für ein Wegweiser? Hier laufen laut OSM weder Wander-noch Radwege entlang.
Oder ist das nur so ein Örtlichkeitsschild?
daniel_solow (2021-03-09 13:22:03+00:00): Hi innoventions can you please share what you did in the Rikers Island project a few months back? I’m looking at the different fencing mapped around 2016 and the footways inside the George Motchan detention center are from 2011. Based on the 2018 Mapbox imagery it looks like the building outline has retracted. I don’t want to change the building outline if you had access to much more recent imagery.
Mahdi Nameghi (2020-12-23 06:02:33+00:00): سلام 
نقشه جای دعوای قومی و شهری نیست. لطفا این تغییر اسامی را تمام کنید در غیر این صورت ریپورت خواهید شد.
moreno96 (2020-12-23 06:15:16+00:00): اوپن استریت مپ مکان خوبی برای جنگ های سرد قبیله ای نیست. 
در صورت تکرار، احتمال بلاک شدن کاربرانی که دست به خرابکاری میزنن وجود داره
Ali00098 (2020-12-23 08:42:02+00:00): این چند لینک را مشاهده کنید خودتون متوجه میشید:

http://news.mrud.ir/news/87631/%D9%85%D8%B7%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B9%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%BE%D8%B1%D9%88%DA%98%D9%87-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AF-%D8%AF%D9%88%D9%85-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%88%D8%B1-%D8%AF%D9%87%D9%82-%DA%AF%D9%84%D9%BE%D8%A7%DB%8C%DA%AF%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%B4%D8%B1%D9%81-%D8%A7%D9%82%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA-%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%D8%AF

https://www.iribnews.ir/fa/news/2958671/%DA%A9%D9%86%D8%AF%DB%8C-%D8%AA%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%AF-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%AE%DB%8C-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%88%D8%B1%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AA%DB%8C-%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%86-%D8%A7%D8%B5%D9%81%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86

https://www.yjc.ir/fa/news/7523746/%DB%8C%DA%A9-%DA%A9%D8%B4%D8%AA%D9%87-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%AB%D8%B1-%D9%88%D8%A7%DA%98%DA%AF%D9%88%D9%86%DB%8C-%D8%AA%DB%8C%D8%A8%D8%A7-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%88%D8%B1-%D9%86%D8%AC%D9%81-%D8%A2%D8%A8%D8%A7%D8%AF-%D8%AF%D9%87%D9%82

این سه لینک رو حتما مشاهده فرمایید
Ali00098 (2020-12-23 08:44:51+00:00): کاربر hossein132  یک فرد خرابکار است و سعی میکند محور های مواصلاتی به دهق را تخریب کرده و نام شهر علویجه را جایگزین کند. این کاربر قبلا با نام Ammaa خرابکاری میکرد که اکانتش مسدود شد و الان تغییر نام داده است
Mahdi Nameghi (2020-12-23 09:20:39+00:00): کاربر عزیز 
اگه مبنا رو بر اساس این لینک ها بذاریم که مشابه آن برای شهر علویجه هم هست. 
من از شما خواهش میکنم تا به گروه کاربران osm ایران بپیوندید تا درباره این مشکل با همفکری سایر کاربران مشکل رفع شود.

https://t.me/OpenStreetMap
Ali00098 (2020-12-23 18:09:46+00:00): بهترین راهکار جناب  Mahdi Nameghi  این اسامی هستند. نه سیخ می سوزد نه کباب::
اصفهان علویجه دهق = راه اصفهان به سمت دو شهر
نجف اباد دهق علویجه = راه نجف آباد به سمت دو شهر

دهق - علویجه 
علویجه - دهق = این اسامی هم راه های بین دو شهر باشن
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-23 07:55:12+00:00): Hallo ojenny, willkommen bei OSM.

Hier bitte ähnliches vermeiden, was in dem anderen Changeset bereits erwähnt wurde: Bitte den name-Tag nicht zum Beschreiben eines Objektes verwenden. Vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:name

Mehr Infos zu dem Changeset: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=96280580

Könnte dies bitte korrigiert werden?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
VLD071 (2020-12-23 00:00:56+00:00): Exceptional edits, thank you for your contributions to OSM!   :-)
Ze0zohk1 (2021-01-01 08:44:01+00:00): Hallo Qwave,

du hast diesen Weg vor kurzem bearbeitet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13860457/history. Weißt du zufällig, wie die surface dort war, weil es steht surface=intermediate drinne - und ich habe keine Ahnung, was das heißen sollen.

Viele Grüße
Qwave (2021-01-01 09:32:47+00:00): Ob da nun Asphalt oder Kleinpflaster ist, weiß ich nicht. Da muss ich beim nächsten mal danach schauen. Es gibt dort durchaus Wege und Straßen die einen gemischten Belag haben.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-01-01 09:34:16+00:00): Hey Qwave, danke für die schnelle Antwort.
Tresho (2020-12-23 09:07:40+00:00): Non mi sembra corretta questa modifica.
Da wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=trunk%20link?uselang=it) sembrerebbe essere più corretto highway=trunk_link
alessandrocarmeli (2020-12-23 16:19:08+00:00): vedi changeset successivo
Tresho (2020-12-23 09:08:00+00:00): Non mi sembra corretta questa modifica.
Da wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:highway=trunk%20link?uselang=it) sembrerebbe essere più corretto highway=trunk_link
alessandrocarmeli (2020-12-23 16:18:47+00:00): si invece, da questa rotonda non si entra solo in T4-T9 ma puoi anche oltrepassare la superstrada andando verso Santa Lucia senza passare per via Brigata Aosta.
le rampe portano in T4-T9 ma la rimanente strada no, pertanto va lasciata così, anzi tra la superstrada e via Carnia sarebbe una terziaria
Tresho (2020-12-23 17:24:18+00:00): Vedo anch'io e (essendo del luogo) conosco l'utilizzo che se ne può fare, ma non sono convinto dal tuo punto di vista.
Anzi, il tuo concetto di strada secondaria e terziaria non sembra corrispondere alle linee guida della wiki sulle highway (vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway).
Qui non si tratta di ambito urbano e nemmeno di un collegamento tra due comuni.
Inoltre lo stretto sottopassaggio ferroviario di Via Fenilon rende molto più scomodo il collegamento San Massimo - Santa Lucia rispetto a Via 24 Giugno o Via Piatti (oltre ad essere più periferico delle altre due strade), ragione per cui è molto meno trafficato.
mariotomo (2020-12-24 15:42:31+00:00): posso intromettermi?  se sto in bicicletta e devo andare da Via Carnia a Via Enzo Ferrari, non prenderei mai gli svincoli, ma proseguirei diritto per via Cason.  se mi dici "questa svincoli sono via terziaria" mi stai esponendo ad un rischio abbastanza serio.
Glassman (2020-12-24 18:02:11+00:00): Looking at Bing imagery which OSM can legally use, https://www.bing.com/maps?toWww=1&redig=4A827C653A9D480E80AB513B46B43DA8 

It appears that there is a gate just before the bridge. If that true - it would be good to add. 

If this is just for horses, where is the driveway to the house?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96281971
ottwiz (2021-08-06 22:48:59+00:00): All County Roads, no matter what are signed, and most likely this road is no exception. So i'll change it to ref=CR 21/20, especially when they're connecting primary roads like WV 16 + 61. 
The thing is that you wrote unsigned_ref = * is that it's not put on a sign post, however the thing is the route marker is put on the street sign
like
Scarbro Road (21/10) <-
ottwiz (2021-08-06 22:49:13+00:00): *(21/20)
ottwiz (2021-08-06 22:56:08+00:00): http://www.andrewturnbull.net/wvhighways.html
especially this is a good mashup of WV roads, how they work
pio2_122 (2020-12-23 10:39:36+00:00): Hej,
Mógłbyś mi wyjaśnić, co się stało z tym budynkiem: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/815952133/history ? Dlaczego go podzieliłeś (obrysy z EGiB tego nie potwierdzają) i jedną część zostawiłeś nie w pełni otagowaną (ww. link)?
Cristoffs (2020-12-23 16:21:09+00:00): Chyba coś pokręciłem. Super że sprawdzasz. Już naprawiam. Walczyłem z walidacją i może coś poszło nie tak
pio2_122 (2020-12-23 18:46:31+00:00): Wszystko jasne :) Dzięki za poprawkę.

A co do sprawdzania: Dla rejonów gdzie w miarę regularnie mapuję ustawiłem sobie powiadomienia RSS z OSMCha. Stąd na bieżąco mogę sprawdzać wszystkie nowości :P