piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tux67 (2019-03-06 09:48:24+00:00): Hi vincentvega,
könntest du bitte deine Changesets mit einem Aussagefähigen Kommentar und Quellenangaben versehen?
Zum anderen: Das Gebäude in dem der Fohlenshop war - ist das wirklich abgrerissen? 
Der Kollege, der das Hotel gemappt hat meine , daß es zumindest vor 3 Wochen noch da war.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67819703
Inka07 (2019-03-08 10:38:10+00:00): Das Gebäude ist inzwischen abgerissen...
tux67 (2019-03-08 11:57:02+00:00): ok, danke für die Bestätigung
einherjerdave (2019-03-06 20:22:07+00:00): Bäcker hat geschlossen ist natürlich quatsch, das war eine vorherige Änderung;

Da steht ein Poller, der von Fußgängern passiert werden kann, Autos benötigen dafür so einen "Feuerwehrschlüssel"
PT-53 (2019-12-27 10:08:05+00:00): Hallo Harald,
im OSM-Inspector wird für diese Linien
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674746120/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674746121/history
ein Hinweis "ways_without_tags" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.02470&lat=47.44490&zoom=17&opacity=0.17&overlays=ways_without_tags
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an oder kann ich die Linien löschen?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-01-13 11:49:54+00:00): Hallo Harald,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an oder kann ich die Linien löschen?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-01-26 08:26:31+00:00): Hallo Harald,
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an oder kann ich die Linien löschen?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-02-16 12:49:16+00:00): Keine Reaktion, Schade!
Linien ohne Merkmale gelöscht
eggie (2019-03-05 22:02:58+00:00): Dag Reinout.. Probeer te voorkomen dat je paden aan de landuse plakt. 
Ook zit de landuse een beetje in de knoop. Ik zal het uit de knoop halen. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-05 22:15:16+00:00): Landuse uit de knoop gehaald. 
Het zou anders niet meer goed renderen. 
Dit waren je eigen edits. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67820096
Gr eggie
Reinout Wientjes (2019-03-06 20:30:37+00:00): Dag Eggie, Dank je voor de verbetering. Op https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=17/51.98954/5.37846 ziet het er nu prachtig uit. In het vervolg zal ik  het ook zo proberen te doen.
Mvg, Reinout
Reinout Wientjes (2019-03-06 20:47:42+00:00): Wanneer is het eindresultaat te zien op https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.98950/5.37847? Dan kan ik bekijken of mijn bedoeling goed is overgekomen.
Mvg, Reinout
eggie (2019-03-06 20:59:26+00:00): Dag Reinout,  Er zijn wat problemen momenteel met de rendering. Di ligt bijna stil. Soms helpt in- en uitzoomen. Je kunt het best de humanitarian layer gebruiken om resultaat te zien.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67820096#map=17/51.98950/5.37713&layers=H
Rechts in het scherm kun je dat aanpassen.
Zie ook op het forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=740406#p740406
MVG,
Eggie
Reinout Wientjes (2019-03-06 21:10:43+00:00): Dank je. Op de humanitarian layer ziet het er goed uit. Hebben jullie nog vrijwilligers nodig? Ik ben net gepensioneerd en een enthousiast gebruiker van OSM kaarten. Op de website kan ik niets vinden over vrijwilligers. Ik zie ook niet hoe ik een PB moet sturen, anders had ik deze vraag via die weg gestuurd.
eggie (2019-03-06 21:31:37+00:00): PB gestuurd..
ovruni (2019-03-05 22:12:27+00:00): Hola, los cambios realizados dan a entender que cada edificio es un hospital que tiene el mismo nombre, lo cual no es correcto. Por lo cual procedo a revertir los conjuntos de cambios realizados. Para cualquier consulta puedes contactar por cualquiera de los canales de la comunidad en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
Omar
Luisfe Gomez (2019-03-06 02:36:24+00:00): hola una consulta, de que manera o en que atributo se puede indicar que los poligonos que determinan el area construida, para efectos de filtrarlo en QGIS y hacer un invetnario de las edificaciones que corresponden al sector salud.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-05 22:49:37+00:00): Heya, welcome to OSM! Thank you for your contributions so far.

On the forest you added here, you mentioned it wasn't managed. Forest on OSM implies that it is managed, you might be better off re-tagging it as natural=wood as this implied unmanaged woodland.

also, some other things - you've added some driveways as living streets - this probably isn't the right tag to use there. Check this page on the OSM wiki for more info on these kinds of streets:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask!

Happy mapping :)
mariotomo (2020-03-03 16:17:12+00:00): hola Didiel.  gracias por seguir añadiendo información, pero déjame entender porqué haces algo así … como poner dos áreas con etiquetas iguales, casi contiguas, pero sin ponerlas en contacto.  me refiero a `natural=wood` cerca de los nodos 6319177892 y 6319177905.
mariotomo (2020-03-03 16:19:02+00:00): igual, cerca del punto 6319177880
viloan (2019-03-05 20:55:06+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mueschel (2019-03-15 14:08:31+00:00): Hi,
you added many nodes with two strange tags:
    HASH=b9bab73747ff1e2a
    NUMBER=47
Could you check and fix this?

Jan
Jakka (2019-03-06 08:03:26+00:00): Is dit een community_centre https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=community%20centre?uselang=nl
Leo Slager (2023-06-17 20:22:15+00:00): Hoi Gertjan,

Als je de tags van de reeds aanwezige bushalte verwijderd, staat de node zonder tags nog steeds in de routerelatie. De nieuwe bushalte moet dus nog worden ingevoegd in de routerelatie van de buslijnen.
ik pas het even aan.
GinaroZ (2019-03-06 12:00:23+00:00): If https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5236651322/ is closed then the amenity=cafe tag should be removed
Omnific (2019-03-06 00:15:49+00:00): Another broken changeset. Please stop adding duplicates.
n76 (2019-03-06 00:35:23+00:00): Diddo Omnific's comment. At the very least please conflate you adds/changes with the existing data. Your last attempt at this was reverted and I think this one should to.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-06 07:22:42+00:00): Pensez à nettoyer les scories telles que https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674806274, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674806273 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674806271 qui sont manifestement des erreurs et non des bâtiments.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67824959
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-06 07:23:50+00:00): Oups, vous l'avez fait plus tard... Merci ! J'aurais du regarder l'historique de ces objets !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67824959
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-05 23:19:46+00:00): This clearly isn't a park, please don't make fantasy edits to OSM.
WoodWoseWulf (2019-03-05 23:20:14+00:00): Whoops, commented on the wrong changeset :S
Aleks-Berlin (2019-03-14 08:34:14+00:00): Hi abdona, please add known tags to new objects. see e.g. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
Alex
Omnific (2019-03-06 00:15:08+00:00): Yep, this is broken again. All duplicate nodes.
BCNorwich (2019-03-06 07:40:39+00:00): Hi, I joined your gate to the highway as I take it that you meant the gate as a barrier to the highway. Also put in the pedestrian/cycle path to the side of it. I the pedestrian/cycle path the correct side of the gate? Please adjust if not, Thanks.

Regards Bernard.
Jason Burns (2019-03-25 11:16:08+00:00): Thanks Bernard - yes, that's fine (there is access either side but that's evident when you get to the gate)

Cheers, Jason
letihu (2019-03-13 09:12:32+00:00): Diesen Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674812616/history
musst du auch noch mit dieser Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674812616/history
verbinden, wenn sie sich kreuzen ;-)
Marius Geitle (2019-03-05 23:56:13+00:00): Er dette faktisk en landfill, altså et sted for å levere søppel? Kan https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:embankment være mer passende?
Marius Geitle (2019-03-06 00:02:42+00:00): Klarte å kopiere inn feil link, tenkte på https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dembankment
Christian Madsen (2019-03-10 10:29:06+00:00): Takk for tilbakemelding. Har endret det nå.
user_7581226 (2019-07-29 09:04:06+00:00): Während meiner Mapping Tätigkeit in dieser Region, wurden meine Edits durch seltsame Eingriffe in die OpenStreetMap Datenbank, mehrfach zurückgesetzt. Ich bezichtige den User Nakaner Firma Geofabrik hierbei seine Administrationsrechte Missbraucht zu haben.
Johann Haag
im Juli 2019
user_7581226 (2019-07-29 09:44:05+00:00): Hinweis, warum ich hier Linien gelöscht habe, ist dadurch begründet, da ich gemerkt habe, dass neuangegte Elemente, das Rücksetzenen per Servereingriffe verhindert haben. Ich war vordem bemüht, die Historie von Objekten jeweils zu erhalten, genau das hat die Person ausgenutzt, um Rücksetzungen zu vertuschen. Das zurücksetzen neuangelegter Elemente hätte hingegen auffällige Löcher verursacht.
freebeer (2019-07-29 18:36:28+00:00): you are really digging yourself into a hole.

anyone can repair things and is encouraged to do so particularly when proper procedures are ignored.

and now you are justifying deleting the contributions made by others based on the misled assumption that by making a revert non-trivial, it is not possible?

i have a surprise for you, it happens regularly despite what happens in attempts to hinder it.

it seems you are quite happy to sabotage osm and damage the work of others in order to advance your own agenda which in the past weeks of activity has had me increasingly and now completely baffled.

the phrases meltdown and high-speed-car-crash-in-slow-motion are the best i can describe things as an outsider, undercover operative taking orders from F¡гма Ģеоfаbrıĸ.
user_7581226 (2019-07-29 19:09:50+00:00): Hello freebear, In months I have been trying to make OpenStreetMap better in the given region.  Can you understand that from me here experienced.  The region is very big, and I only knew how to help by improving everything.  Nevertheless, my changes have disappeared several times as if by magic.  regards
freebeer (2019-07-29 22:00:58+00:00): servus geocodec,

actually, i must apologise for not fully understanding when presented below a list of deleted ways, which with a few Stichproben linked to other mappers' contributions.

with a better view of this presented by https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=67825548
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=67825548 
(argh i hate having a broken mouse and only a tablet touchscreen kezboard)
there was nothing actually deleted without being redrawn, very different from my first impressions and how you used these commentaries to launch an attack on Michael.

this generally goes against the agreed rules to preserve the fact of other mappers' contributions, much like to use a dedicated and identifiable account for imports, that would have kept you out of the predicament of being unable to separate bad imported data or processes from good manual labour.

the important thing is to realise the rules are there for a reason and to respect and follow them as they are not a personal attack, as it seems you feel DWG actions are, but are there for the benefit of other mappers as well in this community.

i cannot see why you would bring this up as this changeset has not been reverted, especially bringing up unprovoked the idea of sabotaging a revert action that anyone can perform.

throwing around these paranoid conspiracy theories has backfired by causing me to assume the  worst for this changeset.

still, as others have said, not using a consistent linkable account identity and carrying out edits to thwart edit actions goes very much against  the rules, that i have only experienced the worst malicious vandals seeking to break, and this is not the company i wish to see you associated with, having seen the results of other mappers truly turning not just bad, but destructive to the project and community.

i cannot say anything about the reverts performed, but i suspect they are justified placed into proper context, and i would need to be shown a changeset as i do not follow DWG or moderator activity.

however osm is a community and failing to abide by community standards places you at odds with the community in ways that are guaranteed to alienate some, just as i regularly receive criticism for failing to act a certain way, that i am sure some would like to see acted upon and find me blocked from contributing in the future.

but i know i must accept that as part of the condition of being able to participate as i do trying to clean up damage, and to live within the rules and respect others and their contributions.
user_7581226 (2019-07-29 22:12:35+00:00): I respect your efforts to shed light on the matter because that confirms my trust in the DWG. JH
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-06 07:27:08+00:00): Lorsque c'est un bois naturel et non une forêt cultivée par l'homme, alors c'est plutôt natural=wood que landuse=forest. Le feuillages est probablement leaf_type=broadleaved
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67825777
ika-chan! (2019-03-06 22:50:45+00:00): Hi there, I have done the north of the city, and added the necessary editing notes there to clear up any confusion for others. I happened to have enough time today.
Yohn79 (2019-03-06 19:35:33+00:00): Z tym highway=services tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674829844 chyba coś nie tak jest, bo to są zupełnie różne firmy rozdzielone od siebie. To nie jest jeden wspólny teren.
user_4493657 (2019-03-06 23:41:41+00:00): Jak dla mnie teren ten spełnia funkcję zawartą w tagu highway=services. (Obiekty na ortofotomapie kształtem przypominają stacje paliw, prawdopodobnie można tam zrobić przerwę w podróży, coś zjeść, kupić, widać parkingi drogi wewnętrzne, myjnie). Pomiędzy oznaczonym przeze mnie obszarem, a ulica śremską można byłoby moim zdaniem wyodrębnić obszar landuse=commercial ewentualnie landuse=industrial
wille (2019-03-07 21:54:29+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está tudo correto!

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67826964
Ls92 (2019-03-07 07:23:32+00:00): Nice work
ralley (2019-03-06 19:02:56+00:00): I don't know about this road specifically but road names do use macrons, see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-36.87596734587157&lng=174.6987959799185&z=17&pKey=zIDBVkw-vQuqKO4gUvV0bg&focus=photo&x=0.36845352126638037&y=0.46399225946483064&zoom=0.5372492836676218 for example
user_2242968 (2019-03-11 01:58:20+00:00): That's interesting; I hadn't seen that before.  (I've seen some street signs in NZ where someone - for some reason - has gone ahead and taped (or painted) a macron on the name, but this sign looks 'official'.)  NZTA - as a general rule - doesn't put macrons on their signs (presumably to not reduce readability), but perhaps some local authorities, as here, sometimes decide to do otherwise for local street signs.
user_2242968 (2019-03-13 10:09:33+00:00): FYI, I stopped by that street sign (in Waterview, Auckland) today to check it out - and it turns out that the macron there is bogus.  It's not on the original sign; instead someone came along later and stuck some tape on the first "a", to make a macron.  I'm not sure why they did that, but I hope it made them feel good...
ralley (2019-03-18 18:40:39+00:00): So it it - they must have been quick because it's been there since the sign went up.  I shall correct the name in OSM since I based it off the sign
NyanSten (2019-04-28 20:39:15+00:00): There's a lot of signs with macrons on them. Macrons are allowed in names since at least 2010, as stated in their sings guidelines:
https://www.nzta.govt.nz/assets/resources/motsam/part-1/docs/motsam-1-section-01.pdf

This one seems legit, it is half the lettering stroke width as stated in the document.
NyanSten (2019-04-30 02:31:50+00:00): Street sign for Kākatai Lane was installed with macrons by Albert-Eden Local Board (point 14):
http://infocouncil.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/Open/2017/07/AE_20170726_MIN_7060.htm
mapman44 (2019-05-24 18:51:45+00:00): Thanks for your edit and sorry it took so long for someone to review it. You should review the information at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dcliff  about cliffs. If there really is a feature that meets the criteria it should be mapped as a line, not a point. As for Riverbanks Speedy Mart, is there primary business really fast food, or is a convenience store? Please review the info at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dconvenience
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67827695
jo_yo (2019-03-30 05:23:46+00:00): Hi Isaac. The roads in this area should be unclassified instead of tertiary because they only lead to farms and hamlets. Also, make sure you are connecting the roads you draw by snapping them together. Thanks for mapping!
chnav (2019-11-18 07:12:27+00:00): Привет, я вернул поворотную точку границы РФ-Казахстан обратно. Проведена демаркация и делимитация, есть погранстолбы. Они первичны, а не полевые тропы. На Максаре эти столбы видно.
chnav (2019-11-18 07:14:08+00:00): Ограничительные арыки и лесопосадки это наследие СССР, поэтому если в Договоре написано "идёт по прямой" - то граница идёт по прямой линии от одного столба к другому. пашни впоследствии подгоняются под новые реалии.
chnav (2019-11-18 07:24:21+00:00): Исправил границу Троицкого заказника, чтобы не залазил в Казахстан.
besgeo (2019-11-19 13:30:53+00:00): OK!
besgeo (2019-11-19 13:35:25+00:00): Столбы, и правда, видно.
pitscheplatsch (2019-03-06 20:47:25+00:00): Hi MAJORHIGH, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind this mass-deletion? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67828414
freebeer (2019-06-02 23:28:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70867520 where the changeset comment is: three months failing to defend deleting the items clearly seen here.  is this golf mapping like pokemon except accompanied by mass deleting things clearly seen in all aerials and obviously needing to be present?  reverted too, to the best of my ability
Vulcanodong (2019-03-31 11:47:45+00:00): 请勿添加未建成的高速道路
pitscheplatsch (2019-03-06 20:48:33+00:00): Hi MAJORHIGH, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind this mass-deletion? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67828583
freebeer (2019-06-02 22:40:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70867216 where the changeset comment is: nearly three months without a response or justification, and the deletions here and elsewhere have come to my attention through other means, and i see nothing in aerials to suggest they are the least bit plausible.  inaccurate is no reason to delete.
andrewwiseman (2019-03-12 22:22:02+00:00): Thanks for mapping. Is this part of a HOT task? Also, you mapped Uswaa Road as a "motorway" which is a multilane divided expressway with exit ramps, but this looks more like a tertiary road, which is what the road on either side is tagged. Make sure to read more about highways before mapping. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway Also please talk to whoever led your event and maybe they can help, or they can reach out to me with more questions.
Aleks-Berlin (2019-03-07 11:04:11+00:00): Hi, please write wikipedia=en:Name, not http...
Thanks, Alex
Aleks-Berlin (2019-03-07 11:04:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
andrewwiseman (2019-03-12 22:24:32+00:00): Thanks for mapping. It looks like this project you are working on is buildings only, so please don't map roads for it - in this case there's another motorway that should be a tertiary or unclassified road. Thank you.
philippec (2019-09-29 13:32:22+00:00): Ik heb aed https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6320083700
aan de juiste kant van de straatlantaarn gezet.
escada (2019-09-30 05:28:36+00:00): OK, bedankt !
freebeer (2019-06-02 23:31:35+00:00): not quite sure what went wrong here - https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=67830195 shows what can be confirmed below, that you re-created a lot of nodes but almost no ways here.

the nodes were then deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69891223 some time later.

i am (after three months :-/ ) attempting another revert with traditional unintelligent tools, with limited success.
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70867216 partly deals with the note bringing this to my attention, but obviously fails miserably overall.

serves me right for going offline for two months...

https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=70867520 is not much better.  probably worse even.
mueschel (2019-03-07 22:28:03+00:00): This changeset contains many strange tags like
Dept=DAD
District=Moneragala
E=213791.0
Irri_Div=Weli Oya
N=155495.0
Region=Moneragala
Riv_Basin=Walawe Ganga
Sub_RivBas=Uda Walawe

Please have a look and convert them to common OSM tags if needed or delete them if not.

Thanks
Jan
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-06 17:07:01+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок сдвигает объекты на карте. Вы выравниваете спутниковые снимки под GPS-треки перед редактированием?  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2
mavl (2019-03-06 16:51:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. Если вы хотите обозначить банк (а судя по названию это банк), то кроме имени вы должны добавить тег банка amenity=bank.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:amenity%3Dbank  
  
Кроме того, этот банк обычно называют одним словом «Россельхозбанк».
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-06 16:53:07+00:00): Слово "кафе" в названии не нужно указывать.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].