piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vucod (2020-03-26 20:45:46+00:00): Hello,

I inform that someone can lye on the bench. 
In case of doubts, this can be verified when doing survey, by lying on the bench.
This could also be determined most of the time by looking at 3 things. 
The length of the bench, the presence of an "inner" separation on the bench between different seats and by checking if it is a standing bench. 
Note that length was refused as an official key for bench and that the key for the separation doesn't exist (armrest does not specifically concern the inner part of the bench).

There has been some discussions over the years: 
- https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/avbmsb/is_there_a_preferred_way_of_mapping_possible/  
- https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/8rs7zf/how_to_map_antihomeless_bench/
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:amenity%3Dbench#sleeping.3Dyes.2Fno

but with no conclusion. I think this has repelled people to map that. Today, there is nearly no such information in OSM. Maybe it is because it not its place?
Nobody expressed that clearly. So, I started to use this key as I wanted to map that information. I'm aware that it is better if I document it and start some discussions in the tagging mailing list among others.
I had planned to do it later when a few are mapped.

But now that we have opened the discussion, do you think that lying_hindrance=yes could be better? Or with 3 value options (armrest, short_length, stand_up_bench)?

I look forward to have your opinion or even suggestions.

Vucodil
mapman44 (2020-03-31 16:36:08+00:00): Hello, HughTork, and welcome to OSM. Thanks for your edits. After reviewing the Eugene GIS map I have extended Horizon Road even farther that you had done and I added a driveway. Hope you enjoy mapping. There's plenty of work to do.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82590265
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2020-03-25 03:44:24+00:00): hello again, this is my third and last attempt to reach you and ask you to not alling the data incorrectly. your edits will be reverted if you continue to edit and not reply to the previously changeset comments-
Juan C Balboa (2020-03-25 23:25:43+00:00): Boa noite Nuno.

Contesto en galego, xa que non me sinto capacitado para respostar en inglés; enténdoo ben se está escrito, pero non me sinto cómodo falándoo nin escribíndoo. Entendo ademáis que terás a mesma dificultade entendendo galego que eu entendendo portugués, e que seguramente sexa mellor ler o comentario nese idioma que en castelán, por exemplo XDDD. Se non é así, indícamo e tentarei facerche chegar a resposta doutro xeito. Grazas pola túa compresión.

Desculpa que non contestase antes aos teus comentarios nas edicións, xa que até o de agora non me fixara en devanditos comentarios. De feito, tiven que buscar no internet como consultalos, tras recibir unha mensaxe do usuario topolusitania avisándome desta circunstancia...

Estou realmente desolado por introducir erros no mapa sen ser consciente delo; comparando as imaxes satelitais que usaba con algunhas trazas GPS deume a impresión de que estaban aceptablemente aliñadas, o cal parece ser que non é verdade, polo que comentades. Quizais debería ter deixado as estradas tal como estaban e simplemente crear as relacións desexadas e engadir os segmentos correspondentes, pero veume a neura aliñadora e xa a fastidiei; de todo corazón, desculpas polo acontecido.

Se a solución máis fácil e rápida para arranxar os erros introducidos nas miñas edicións é revertelas, por favor, adiante con iso. Se soubese facer eu esa operación de xeito confiable, xa o tería feito. Non quero facer perder o tempo a ninguén máis por erros de exclusiva resposabilidade miña, e entendo que a reversión das edicións leva muito menos tempo que a corrección manual de ditos erros.

Supoño que a eliminación das edicións introducidas por min nos derradeiros catro días eliminará tamén as relacións engadidas e configuradas. Non hai problema, que se lle vai facer... Entendo tamén que unha vez estea o mapa de novo no seu estado correcto antes de facer o que fixen, poderei crear de novo ditas relacións, pero soamente engadindo os segmentos desexados ás mesmas, sen cambiar ninguna outra cousa; se non é así, por favor indícamo e esquezo definitivamente Madeira :_((.

De novo pido perdón polos erros introducidos involuntariamente, e pola tardanza en contestar. Bueno, agora xa sei algo máis, como consultar notas ás propias edicións ... XDDD.

Unha aperta.
mueschel (2020-03-26 10:43:31+00:00): Hi,
you invented several new 'service:vehicle' tags here, like "service:vehicle:heavy_duty_semi_truck_transmission_repair"
It's unlikely that tags like this will ever be used by any application. 

Please have a look to this list of common keys (note the 'count' column!)
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/service%3Avehicle#similar

It would be very helpful if you could change your tags to these common ones.

Thanks!
Jan
literan (2020-03-25 17:35:39+00:00): я исправил прорисовку островов, сделав мультиполигон, а вы мою правку отменили, вернув свой некорректный вариант. Что ж, оставляю так - видно этих островов не будет.
Тартарен (2020-03-25 18:37:53+00:00): Прошу прощения. Я увидел, что полигон стал линией, а линии нельзя назначить тег "остров" или "островок". Сделайте, пожалуйста, как нужно.
literan (2020-03-26 09:35:09+00:00): Поправил. 

Если вкратце, тег place=islet это для морских островов и крупных именованных островов на реках и озерах. Для обычных мелких островков просто нужно сделать мультиполигон озера, где островок будет входить с ролью inner (т.е. будет просто "дыркой" в озере)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:place=islet
angys (2020-06-14 03:23:39+00:00): Why you delete the hospital building?
Baconcrisp (2020-06-15 15:53:38+00:00): Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I reverted this changeset to re-add the removed features so everything should be back the way it was. Let us know if there is anything else you would like us to address!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-21 21:50:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126481685 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old dubious edits in Saudi Arabia
DUGA (2021-01-03 14:52:29+00:00): Hi,

Please do not duplicate segments.
Nakaner-repair (2020-03-25 18:51:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82624271 where the changeset comment is: Revert addition of subarea members to boundary relations, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82611287 and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68972 for details.
gscscnd (2020-03-25 08:22:53+00:00): 1. <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7326865472>: wydaje mi się, że zamiast tagu <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name> lepiej by było użyć tagu <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref>.
2. Nie połączyłeś drogi <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34321513> z Twoją ścieżką <https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/783849944>. Istniejąca droga ma punkt <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/393705994>, Ty w pobliżu utworzyłeś (na Twojej ścieżce) punkt <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7321530297>. Możesz zaznaczyć obydwa punkty i użyć narzędzia „Połącz węzły” (klawisz „M”). Nie poprawiam, żebyś mógł przećwiczyć.

Dziękuję za zainteresowanie się JOSM­‑em 😉.
svejk13 (2020-03-25 12:22:38+00:00): Poprawiłem. Mam nadzieje teraz jest dobrze połączone. Dziękuję za pomoc.
Glassman (2020-03-25 19:04:05+00:00): I made some updates to your edit. The curb node should be at the approximate location of the actual curb (BTW kerb is British English which is used by OSM since it was founded in England.) I removed the duplicate section of the cycleway to the street by adding it to the existing crossing way. I'll send you some general info on OSM in a message. If my changes are not correct, please let me know.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82592063
ma-rt-in (2020-03-25 11:51:26+00:00): Hallo,
darf man mal erfahren, warum du soviele Relationen erstellt hast, die eigentlich gar nicht nötig sind?
vg
NovemberCharly (2020-03-26 17:36:43+00:00): Moin,
es ist richtig, dass man einige der Multipolygone auch mit geschlossenen ways darstellen koennte. Anstelle eine Vielzahl von ways uebereinander zu malen (die gleichen nodes benutzend), bevorzuge ich aber den way in mehreren Mulitpolygonen wiederverwenden zu koennen.
Anmerkung: Ich behaupte nicht der andere Weg waere "falsch".
Gruss, C.
Nakaner-repair (2020-03-25 18:51:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82624271 where the changeset comment is: Revert addition of subarea members to boundary relations, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82611287 and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68972 for details.
Nakaner-repair (2020-03-25 18:51:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82624271 where the changeset comment is: Revert addition of subarea members to boundary relations, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82611287 and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68972 for details.
eggie (2020-03-25 10:26:44+00:00): Dag Dannox.. Ziet er oke uit..Maar...of je trail_visibility	excellent moet gaan taggen in de bebouwde kom van Veldhoven.
Lijkt me meer iets voor de middle of nowhere.
:)
Het pad Mercurius en Jupiter  hebben nog geen verbinding met het westelijke fietspad.. Is er een mogelijkheid om over te steken? 
De Sondervick staat op bicycle=no (staat er een bord met  fietsverbod?)  ipv bicycle=use_sidepath  
Gr Eggie
Dannox (2020-03-25 12:10:19+00:00): Ja, met de trail_visibility heb je gelijk in. Die kan ik er in feite uit halen. Fietspaden ga ik doortrekken.

Wat de Sondervick betreft, heb ik niks aan aangepast. Maar aangezien er een fietspad naast loopt (met een stoeprand ertussen, dus niet verbonden aan de weg), weet ik in dit geval dus niet of het *=no of *=use_sidepath is. Kan je daar wat uitleg over geven?
eggie (2020-03-25 14:05:55+00:00): In de routering staat als het goed is de hoofdrijbaan op slot als er vrijliggende fietspaden lopen.
Kort door de bocht.. 
Staat er een C14   Dan tag je bicycle=no
Staat er geen bord dan bicycle=use_sidepath.
Bij C15  
bicycle=no
moped=no
Het verschil heeft te maken dat in sommige lande de regels op fietspaden anders zijn. Duitsland bv   Groepen wielrenners op de hoofdrijbaan. 
Het verschil zit 'm dus in wel of niet een verbodsbord. 
Gr eggie
Dannox (2020-03-25 17:50:46+00:00): Heel duidelijk. Bedankt! Ga het aanpassen!
A67-A67 (2020-03-27 14:22:33+00:00): Hallo sb_10,

boundary=administrative wordt gebruikt voor bestuurlijke grenzen, zoals de grenzen van landen, provincies en gemeenten. Het is niet bedoeld voor het gebied dat door een buurtvereniging wordt gebruikt. Daarvoor kan ofwel de algemene tag boundary=yes voor worden gebruikt, ofwel een zelf-bedachte waarde voor boundary die toepasselijk is.
A67-A67 (2020-03-27 14:24:05+00:00): Ik heb het nu aangepast naar boundary=yes.
Nakaner-repair (2020-03-25 18:51:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82624271 where the changeset comment is: Revert addition of subarea members to boundary relations, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82611287 and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68972 for details.
Andre68 (2020-03-25 16:46:26+00:00): Does this island really exist? Which source did you use? I can't see it on any arial imagery.
seav (2020-03-26 11:37:33+00:00): This user has a habit of adding fictitious objects to the map. This changeset should be reverted.

Ref: http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10839391
maning (2020-03-26 11:42:59+00:00): Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82658675
Nakaner-repair (2020-03-25 18:52:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82624271 where the changeset comment is: Revert addition of subarea members to boundary relations, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82611287 and https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68972 for details.
trigpoint (2020-04-02 15:28:23+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
What is the source of this height? I do not remember it being 78m tall :)

More seriously I suspect you meant 78 feet, that should be entered as 78', although it is preferred for buildings that the value is converted to metres.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2020-04-02 15:38:01+00:00): Hi, this change is little confusing.

You have added a name:en to the cafe, whilst leaving the name in place. If the name has changed, then you should change the name tag. I Assume the name should be Blasau Delicatessen and is no longer Royal House. Also based on the name is it still a cafe?
In Wales I would only expect to see name:en alongside name:cy.
Also wondering why your locale is set to en-AU?

Cheers Phil
VictorIE (2021-07-22 07:28:39+00:00): Hi. Are you sure this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31405161/ is steps the whole way?
aharvey (2020-03-27 02:22:34+00:00): Hi I see you removed https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/585994923 and added dual carriage ways.

1. Where possible if you could try to reuse existing ways that's helpful to retain the history. So you could convert that existing way to one of the carriage ways and then create a new one. I know this isn't always easy so it's not a rule, just nice to do if possible.
2. Ways generally are only mapped as each direction if there is a physical barrier separating them. In this case from the imagery and at https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/SGbQF7N5A9y6aVj9HOVIqA I can't see any barrier, if you surveyed recently did you notice any new separation? If not then it should usually be mapped as a single way.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-21 21:50:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126481685 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some old dubious edits in Saudi Arabia
mpx12 (2022-12-11 00:44:40+00:00): I've found that a substantial number of these buildings seem to be offset from several different imagery sources. Is this the case for you as well?
Darbsub (2022-12-11 05:22:38+00:00): Hey, I was using "Ohio Statewide Imagery Program 6-Inch" satellite imagery as I've found it's been the best to see the most details. Bing and some other satellite imagery tends to be slightly off
Antonio 1 (2020-03-27 11:54:16+00:00): exact resource?
DP24PH (2020-03-26 00:29:08+00:00): Notes:
1. Bicycle routes are valid for main roadways, especially the previous validation would prove the presence of bicycle lanes, and the affected bicycle routes have to be restored
2. Main roadway turn restrictions have to be restored as well for safety reasons
3. Light shuttle routes will be taken down until further notice

ERRATUM: #WashingtonPlacePH is part of Sampaloc 2, not Sampaloc 5
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-03-26 02:41:19+00:00): 1.) If they are signposted, fine, but I doubt if the HOA ever have designated such routes. I'm getting tired dealing with all the experimental stuff you tend to add.
2.) Please don't add turn restrictions that aren't signed or already implied by traffic rules. You may think it's unsafe to turn to a certain street due to a sharp angle, but for a safety-related turn restriction to be added here, there must be any sign saying so. I doubt ever if the developer have posted any signage indicating those you mapped.
DP24PH (2020-03-26 03:04:08+00:00): Will take note of your comments for further improvements, and thank you so much for your insights.
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-03-26 03:23:45+00:00): I thank you for your contributions to your local area, but please make your edits verifiable to other mappers, and don't add things that are too hard for users to clean up. I'll continue with cleaning up the rest of your edits around your subdivision.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-17 10:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83701380 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3635
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-17 10:47:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83701380 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some political edits in the south China Sea.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3635
DaveF (2021-01-04 10:55:47+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10901513#map=10/55.2823/-4.3835
Where did you obtain the data for this relation? It covers a large area overlaying many residential, wood, & water area which clearly aren't 'heath'
Glassman (2020-03-27 19:11:40+00:00):  way/784371047 is actually going through a newer development that is shown on the ESRI World Imagery.  You can't always trust the facebook ML streets. It comes from fairly old imagery. This area has lots of new development. I removed it as I was adding in sidewalks.
jyotkuma (2020-03-30 05:05:29+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for the correction and information. I shall pass on this to my internal team.

Regards,
jyotkuma
_ned (2020-03-25 04:51:55+00:00): Used https://www.seattle.gov/Documents/Departments/SPU/EnvironmentConservation/LongfellowCreekWatershedMap.pdf (via https://www.seattle.gov/utilities/environment-and-conservation/our-watersheds/urban-watersheds/duwamish-river/longfellow-creek) for reference
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:04:08+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
arnd-f (2020-03-26 13:10:43+00:00): Danke!
user_5359 (2020-03-25 15:41:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Mike Raust (2020-08-25 22:24:58+00:00): Dear BladeTC,

where is the Wiki page for this (good) import?
BladeTC (2020-08-25 23:50:09+00:00): Hello, no Wiki yet, we discussed it on the Brazilian Telegram Community.
https://web.telegram.org/#/im?p=@OSMBrasil_Comunidade
User1 - Lightcyphers (2020-03-25 06:14:51+00:00): RU:Fixed the issues (Overlapping ways;Crossing highway/waterway)
user_5359 (2020-03-25 15:40:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 15:05:46+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
carfog81 (2020-03-26 16:05:20+00:00): Please take care, there is two Route relation that you damaged (C10 and C19). I already fixed it.

Best Regards
Siobkhan (2020-03-30 04:49:08+00:00): Thanks for the correction. but then a one-way road was drawn here. according to the logic of movement, anyway, it was necessary to connect or remove the "one-way" tag with something.
Kappelner (2020-03-25 20:50:48+00:00): Moin Zartbitter,
ich hatte vor 5 Jahren fälschlicherweise die Hausnummer als 18 und 20 eingetragen. Wie mir jetzt aufgefallen war, ist das aber das Baujahr und an dem Haus steht auch „Belgrad 1“ dran. Ich hatte das also geändert.
Hat das einen Grund, dass du das teilweise rückgängig gemacht hast?
Zartbitter (2020-03-26 06:12:10+00:00): Hallo Kappelner,
ich bin mir relativ sicher, die Hausnummer 20 vor ein paar Jahren auch selbst gesehen zu haben, und Hausnummern verändern sich ja nicht so häufig. In einem offiziellen Datensatz (habe soeben nachgeschaut) gibt es auch die Adresse Belgrad 20, aber nicht Belgrad 1. Für mich sah das damals einfach nach Durchnummerierung im Dorf aus, bevor die Straßennamen in die Adresse einbezogen wurden, wie z.T. auch in Arnis.
BTW eine Jahreszahl am Gebäude kann alles mögliche bedeuten, von Baudatum über Anbaudatum bis zu Renovierungsdatum oder einfach geraten oder ausgedacht.
Wenn du sagst, du hast "Belgrad 1" gesehen, dann ändere ich das natürlich wieder zurück.
Schöne Grüße!
Kovoschiz (2020-03-25 08:51:02+00:00): Please explain why North Point is moved and Fortress Hill downgraded. There is alaos `place=quarter` in between if you disagree that it is a `place=suburb`/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82600956
user_3323986 (2020-03-26 03:35:35+00:00): Hi,
If you go to http://www.hkmaps.hk/mapviewer.html and juxtapose the 1845 map(for more exposed topography) over the the current map, one can see that:
a. the topographic feature leading to the naming of the suburb (Braemar Hill) is actually on the east end of the said neighbourhood.
b. the ascent on the western end of Braemar Hill Road and the western half of the neighbourhood is actually towards Red Incense Summit
c. "Fortress Hill" by topograpghy is no more than a shoulder of the Red Incense Summit, or a west-facing headland of North Point
d. The most prominent topography of the region is the cape North Point
which means that:
1. the western half of the suburb Braemar Hill is an extension of the neighbourhood at best, but by no means the core;
2. Fortress Hill is no more than a human interpretation of the landscape, there was also a past name "East Hill" which is no longer in use, but there is no such landform for the origin of the neighbourhood, history also told us that the name "Fortress Hill" arose from the construction the MTR Station by the same name, which means it's more of an artificial construct by nature.

This also brought to my attention that a previous verdict by your team, of degrading the suburb "Ma Tau Chung" to a neighbourhood, is contradictory "Fortress Hill". "Ma Tau Chung" is a major suburb of its region in terms of human activity, with clear corresponding topography, and a complete developmental history timeline.
I urge you to please reevaluate your decision and an overhaul of your guidelines. Also your interface doesn't allow explanation these toponymy reasoning with the aide of past maps, which I found essential in this field.
Thank you.