piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-12 21:52:59+00:00): Dla mnie wyznacznikiem tego, czy coś jest rondem jest istnienie znaku C-12 bez znaczenia czy jest pod nim znak "ustąp pierwszeństwa. W przykładzie na forum tego znaku nie było. Drugim wyznacznikiem jest to, czy rondo powinno być otagowane jest wg mnie jego odczuwalność - na kwadratowych rondach nie czuć, że jest rondem, więc temat rzeka.
W moim odczuciu to: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/245376280 powinno być otagowane jako rondo.
deleted_account (2015-03-12 21:56:52+00:00): 100 % racji.
Tamte dwa przypadki nawet nie ma o czym mówić, po prostu pomyłka. Dobrze że jest raport :)
rafalxxx (2015-03-12 21:22:32+00:00): Dodany brakujący fragment ulicy
Skippern (2015-03-12 22:05:48+00:00): O que aconteceu aqui? 

Parecendo que um nó no Avenida Guayanases fui deslocado
rafalxxx (2015-03-12 21:21:08+00:00): Dodana droga gruntowa
Hjart (2015-03-13 08:04:45+00:00): Hvorfor har du slettet denne polygon?
MicD (2015-03-13 16:00:53+00:00): Det var som om den "dækkede" over bygningerne under den. Men jeg er ny i dette, så måske var det ikke tilfældet?
Hjart (2015-03-13 18:22:15+00:00): Det burde ikke være tilfældet. Den angav skolens område og bygninger burde altid tegnes over den. Jeg tror det der er sket er at de bygninger du har tegnet blot har været lidt længe om at vise sig på kortet.
Det kort du ser i din browser består af talløse små tern (på engelsk "tiles"), som skal gentegnes hver gang der sker ændringer i et givet område i databasen. Nogle lag (se under ikonerne til højre i skærmbilledet) gentegnes normalt hurtigt, mens andre (som f.eks. cykelkortet) gentegnes sjældnere. Mange begyndere vil forståeligt nok gerne kunne se deres ændringer omgående, men desværre lader det sig ikke altid gøre og ofte er det blot et spørgsmål om at vente op til en dags tid.
Jeg vil tillade mig at revertere sletningen så polygonen kommer tilbage på sin plads.
Ellers vil jeg ønske dig velkommen til vores projekt her og god fornøjelse med det.
MicD (2015-03-13 20:46:42+00:00): Tak for din information. Det er et spændende projekt!
Endres Pelka (2015-07-04 10:48:52+00:00): W czym wadzą public_transport=stop_position?
geri-oc (2015-03-20 14:22:55+00:00): Hallo - bitte Wege (Fahrad-Fußweg) nicht über bereits bestehenden Straßen legen - Verbindung zwischen den Bahnhofsstraßen (entfernt, ist jetzt i.O.) resdidential enthält bereits Berechtigung für Fahrrad und Fußgänger
sommerluk (2015-03-13 17:53:55+00:00): Bon travail !
Evgeniy Bikov (2015-03-12 21:57:29+00:00): добавлена также адресная информация (номера домов и названия улиц)
przemas75 (2016-07-23 05:28:38+00:00): Załaduj tę relację do JOSM, ktoś napsuł ten szlak - jesteś autorem jej, stąd do Ciebe piszę.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4668447/history
Skippern (2015-03-12 22:19:28+00:00): Deve tira o nome da casa, não coloquemos nome do residente nos casas residenciais.
emacsen (2015-03-19 21:57:15+00:00): Are you are aware that you aren't allowed to use Google Street View to populate OSM?
emacsen (2015-03-19 22:04:44+00:00): Sorry for making this comment twice.
nicolas17 (2015-11-09 21:50:55+00:00): Esto fue por survey propio o sólo por http://osm.org/note/289841?
muralito (2015-11-10 17:09:11+00:00): No, por survey no. Nota y forma de iglesia en Bing.
nicolas17 (2015-11-10 17:16:41+00:00): OK, voy a cerrar la nota entonces.
Janjko (2015-05-08 14:54:26+00:00): U ovom changesetu si ucrtao jedan spomenik, historic=monument. Stavio si ga usred šume.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3396312094

Jesi li možda mislio na ovu skulpturu:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3505135731
Matija Nalis (2015-05-20 23:50:04+00:00): Mozda, tesko mi je za reci, imas sliku ili nesto? IIRC radilo se o nekoj skulpturi vjerojatno iz partizanskog doba, a vidjelo se iz vlaka kroz drvece. obzirom je pucano iz vlaka u gibanju, definitivno je aproksimativna lokacija...
Janjko (2015-05-21 09:59:14+00:00): Ako je iz vlaka onda je to vjerojatno taj. Budem izbrisao svoj i dodao tagove na tvoj da ostane povijest.
Supaplex (2015-03-13 17:08:52+00:00): 澎湖很需要人關注，先前畫了一些地方。
真高興有人接續畫下去，讚！
Peter Dobratz (2015-06-07 07:04:18+00:00): Hi, can you explain how you came up with the names "REDNECKVILLE" and "Leprechaun's Workshop"?
Peter Dobratz (2015-06-09 14:08:47+00:00): I haven't heard back about this.  Generally, we do not use all capital letters on names.  These appear to be just a residential house and garage.  I've removed the names on these buildings as the name can't be verified.
RSergei (2015-03-13 17:20:21+00:00): Данные дачи - это всё с/о "Парус"?
emacsen (2015-03-19 21:58:25+00:00): When you say Bing Maps, do you mean the imagery built into JOSM, or the Bing Maps website?
Zian Choy (2016-07-13 04:36:01+00:00): Bing Maps in JOSM
emacsen (2016-07-13 09:40:43+00:00): How do Bing Maps tell you about what the building is?
SomeoneElse (2015-03-19 13:23:23+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29592162 .  Discussion on the tagging list does not provide carte blanche to change tags to your favourite versions.  See also "things that you may read in the Wiki are not a carte blanche for you to change everything so that it fits the Wiki "rules" in http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .
SomeoneElse (2015-03-14 23:33:46+00:00): Erm - are you sure there's really a "university of cool" http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4651566/history in Utrecht?
sabas88 (2015-03-14 23:38:35+00:00): I simply fixed the keys with obvious typos, it's strange the name, but I thought the previous mapper was cool with it, so why deleting it? :-)
sabas88 (2015-03-14 23:39:25+00:00): Also, seems a sort of experiment with 3d mapping...
SomeoneElse (2015-03-14 23:47:32+00:00): I suspect that it might just be test data that they're playing about with - it doesn't really belong in OSM.
SimonPoole (2015-03-16 08:09:09+00:00): Please do not randomly change admin levels on boundaries, in general there is consensus and rules in the communities which entities get which level and changing them without discussion is likely simply to get your edits reverted (as in this case).
sorcrosc (2015-03-15 18:50:32+00:00): Finiamola con queste aree di foresta tanto per colorare.
Scrivi un commento quando carichi una modifica, grazie
Berga (2015-03-16 09:44:01+00:00): Quale è il tuo problema?
Le aree di foresta devono essere dove ci sono, come del resto le altre principali caratteristiche del suolo.
Hai ragione, non avevo visto l'area per scrivere i commenti. 
Io scriverò i commenti, tu meno cazzate.
Grazie
ToniE (2015-03-13 10:16:29+00:00): Hi saduko,

der Node: 1368520194 (amenity=parking_entrance) scheint verrutscht zu sein (unter das "GEMA").

Hab's mal korrigiert.

Viele Grüße,
Toni
M_Kucha (2015-03-30 07:45:44+00:00): Hallo dwausr,

wie ich sehe, hast Du ref:IFOPT nach NVBW gemappt. Kannst Du mir Näheres zu dieser Quelle nennen, d.h. gibt es nun auch in BW ein freigegebenes Hatestellenkataster mit diesen IDs wie bei uns in NRW durch den VRR (Verkehrverbund Rhein-Ruhr) ?
dwausr (2015-03-31 05:44:33+00:00): Servus,

meine Quelle der Nummern ist http://diva4-9.efa-bw.de/Documents/Kataster/Kataster.html. Ob dies ein "offiziell freigegebenes Haltestellenkataster" ist oder einfach der Stand der NVBW (was im Prinzip auf dasselbe rauskommt) weiß ich nicht.
Minh Nguyen (2015-03-14 04:35:54+00:00): Thank you! I’ve been undeleting an old, correct version of the OH–WV boundary in Potlatch 1, but that editor often has selection glitches these days… it looks great now.
robert (2015-03-27 22:34:11+00:00): Are you sure about this? There's something that looks an awful lot like a road on the bing imagery I'm looking at and Ordnance Survey Locator seems to think this road's here http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=893570
shravan91 (2015-03-30 07:34:24+00:00): We have reverted the changeset. Thanks for the update!
Baskoff KOUASSI (2015-06-21 21:28:31+00:00): BONJOUR 
ABOBO EST MA ZONE DE TRAVAIL ET JE VOUDRAIS QU ON ECHANGE A PROPOS DE LA CARTO
Kishoreganj (2016-06-30 19:21:51+00:00): iD 1.7.0
vasony (2015-09-17 12:10:11+00:00): Szia!
Honnan az infó, hogy a pékség címe Hungária krt. 42?
Mert elvileg a 40-44 az a VIII. kerületi oldalra esik és a stadionok a 48-58
AndreasTUHU (2015-09-17 16:46:08+00:00): A blokkra ez volt nyomtatva címként. Ma is vásároltam a pékségben, ez van a blokkon:
Szatmáry Zöldséges Stadion, 1143 Budapest Hungária körút 42.
Alexey Vazhnov (2015-03-14 06:51:56+00:00): Какие-то правки реки Уй. Два куска удалены, видимо объединил с другим куском.
robert (2015-03-14 00:15:59+00:00): Did you mean to get rid of the named "Helder Street" in this edit? It's broken a match against Ordnance Survey Locator: http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=361475
robert (2015-03-14 00:16:11+00:00): ^name
MapperIAm (2015-03-16 08:52:32+00:00): Hi,
Yes, I meant to delete the street, I have no idea how it would have got there, it was a short line, at a jaunty angle and just doesn't exist.
What I didn't think about was that it was (eroneously) named and was close enough to the real street to make it look right on your "monitoring system". I've moved the name to the correct street.
I've also learned to think a bit more ;-) and that there is a wonderful system behind it all checking street names :-)
robert (2015-03-16 19:29:49+00:00): Interestingly, we quite often find errors in OS Locator this way, at which point we start using the not:name= tag to mark them.
Владимир К (2015-11-05 12:47:38+00:00): wrong opening_hours tag. You entered it twice "opening_hours=opening_hours=Mo-Su 11:30-20:00", but should only "opening_hours=Mo-Su 11:30-20:00". Please, read the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours . OSM works with key=value, and there opening_hours is the key, and Mo-Su 11:30-20:00; Tu off is the value, not opening_hours=Mo-Su 11:30-20:00 Tu off
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-29 17:59:14+00:00): Correcting spelling on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3396622871
TourenbikerFKB (2015-03-14 09:15:29+00:00): Ergänzung: auch kein Restaurant in der näheren Umgebung!
CloCkWeRX (2017-06-05 12:50:34+00:00): A strava user says: "L'itinéraire ne passe pas par la route. Il coupe au travers la foret au lieu de suivre la route. Il n'y a pas de sentier de foret à cet endroit. Merci de corriger ce problème. "
captain_slow (2017-06-05 13:00:24+00:00): can you provide a link to this problem on strava or put an osm note to the exact position of the problem? i think the osm note would be better because local mapper could see it (i am not a local mapper). unfortunately it is not very clear from your message where the problem exactly is.
cheers
CloCkWeRX (2017-06-05 13:06:26+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/391524290 - this section of path between the two roads is where they indicated.
captain_slow (2017-06-05 13:15:07+00:00): thank you for the clarification, i have put a note there because i am not familiar with the situation there.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1020031
aharvey (2019-10-06 08:16:18+00:00): Hey I've fixed the helipad you accidentally moved in this changeset https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/29445911
SOSM (2015-03-22 15:33:22+00:00): Hallo in diesem und in vielen anderen Edits in der Gegend hast du Strassen und Strassnamen hinzugefügt. Leider hast du für beide keine Quelle angegeben. Kannst du das in Zukunft bitte tun und für die Edits im Thurgau bitte  die Quelle hier nennen?
shravan91 (2015-03-13 11:37:45+00:00): the comment is - Fixed unconnected road
kogutowicz-mano (2022-03-07 11:01:05+00:00): Szia!
Honnan származik az információ, hogy a tokaji adótoronyhoz 35 kV-os vezetékek mennek fel? Ez elég ritka feszültségérték ugyanis.
GeoLaci (2022-03-09 16:54:45+00:00): Szia! Ez az infó egy Émász térképről való, de már elavult. tegnap megnéztem az E-közmű térképen ott 20kV-os feszültséget írnak. Remélem ez a valós jelenleg.
ViriatoLusitano (2015-03-13 23:55:36+00:00): Bom trabalho!
SomeoneElse (2015-03-13 14:59:26+00:00): Has the park at Burniston Road http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255566101/history really disappeared?  It's still there on the imagery.  What's it been replaced with?
BeverleyKiter (2015-03-13 21:22:29+00:00): It has been removed as part of the new water park development.
SomeoneElse (2015-03-19 01:25:41+00:00): Ah - OK, thanks.
SomeoneElse (2015-09-26 15:58:45+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/332527313/history currently has a tag "yes=no".  I'm guessing that perhaps it's some other sort of access (bicycle? horse?) that should be set to "no" here?
giuliopv (2015-09-26 16:12:28+00:00): Ooops i made a mistake, fixed.

bicycle=yes.
Firefishy (2015-03-13 14:11:04+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap South Africa. Appreciate the addition. Any more greatly appreciated.
massic80 (2015-03-13 14:00:10+00:00): Wrong modification title
sabas88 (2015-03-13 17:14:40+00:00): E se non è esistente perchè mapparla??
Hiruma92 (2015-03-13 17:43:37+00:00): Sorry, sino nuovo e ho fatto casino 😅 come posso cancellarla?
sabas88 (2015-03-13 18:58:45+00:00): Apri di nuovo l'area, la selezioni e la cancelli :-) (quando si apre il menu circolare ci dovrebbe essere l'icona del cestino). Se vuoi lo faccio io.
Penso di capire cosa volevi fare ma non è il modo giusto... Se ti serve una mano o hai bisogno di aiuto / informazioni mandami pure un messaggio privato..
Constable (2016-06-17 16:23:02+00:00): Ciao, vorrei segnalarti che è stata aperta una nota in corrispondenza di una way da te creata tempo fa; puoi dare un'occhiata per favore?
Questa è la nota
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/597100

grazie
sbiribizio (2016-06-17 17:01:45+00:00): Ho controllato e sistemato.
Avevo cancellato i tag di una power=substation dimenticandomi di cancellare la way perimetrale.
Grazie della segnalazione
Constable (2016-06-17 17:02:41+00:00): grazie a te!
Buona continuazione
Messy Unicorn (2015-03-13 19:22:55+00:00): Velkommen til OSM! :-)
Husk å skrive en kort liten kommentar som forteller hva/hvorfor du endret det du endret!
trigpoint (2015-03-13 15:19:43+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM.
I am a little puzzled by your change, you seem to have deleted a section of path which is clearly visible on bing aerial imagery.
As you have not left a changeset comment it would be useful if you would explain your change.
Thanks
wutr (2015-03-13 15:31:00+00:00): Sorry, I should have explained. The road and path have been closed and fenced off. I  should probably remove the road as well, as it's now within the boundaries of the airport and not accessible to the general public.
trigpoint (2015-03-13 17:02:20+00:00): Thanks for the explanation
It is better to tag as acces=private, as they still exist, a path or road does not have to be removed if not accessible and adding access tags clarifies that. If you simply remove them, then some may re-draw them.
Sergey93 (2017-12-20 16:17:51+00:00): Этот гавнюк насоздавал кучу мини разворотов и треугольных ответвлений дороги
Hjart (2015-07-31 07:23:36+00:00): Please note that any highway=* (roads/paths of any kind) should not overlap anywhere. I've fixed a few instances of this in this area
EdLoach (2015-03-13 16:15:27+00:00): Hi. Did you mean to delete so many nodes out of the Cheltenham/Cotswold border? The latest data I have from OS OpenData BoundaryLine shows the pre-amended boundary. Let me know if you'd like me to help with any undeleting. Best wishes. Ed
TFTD (2015-03-14 08:13:12+00:00): Hallo, ich glaube dieser Edit war zumindest bezüglich Lindau nicht korrekt. Du hast, wenn ich das Richtig sehe, nur den Stadtteil "Insel" in "Lindau (Bodensee)" umbenannt.

Schau mal den Unterschied zwischen (korrekter Administrativer Bereich Stadt Lindau (Bodensee):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/959426

und was er jetzt findet:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240030533

Das sind jetzt die Norminatin Ergebnisse. Ich kenne mich leider mit der Benennung von Stadtteilen und wie man das am sinnvollsten macht, noch nicht aus, daher würde ich dich bitten das zu korrigieren.

Was aber allgemein für Lindau zu fehlen scheinen, ist der Stadt Tag "Lindau Bodensee" der das korrekte Gebiet umfasst.

vg
gnlpfth (2015-03-14 08:51:33+00:00): Hallo, das war ursprünglich der "Stadt-node" für Lindau, siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/240030533/history, ehe er zum Stadtteil umgewidmet wurde. Diese Änderung habe ich zurückgesetzt, da sie fehlerhaft war und es für den place=city Knoten keinen Ersatz gab. Ich würde einen Knoten mit place=suburb und name =Insel ergänzen.
TFTD (2015-03-14 13:12:30+00:00): Kannst du eventuell schauen, dass der Lindau (Bodensee) tag nicht auf der Insel liegt? Und irgendwie scheint dahinter eine sehr kleine Fläche zu liegen. Wenn man den zweiten Link von mir anklickt sieht man hoffentlich was ich meine. Er zoomt ziemlich weit rein und zeigt eine kleine Kreisförmige Fläche an. Das ist ja so nicht korrekt.
Ich weiß nur nicht, wie man das korrekt macht. (Würde es aber durchaus gerne wissen.)
gnlpfth (2015-03-14 21:30:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29480911
Die kleine kreisförmige Fläche ist der Knoten mit place=city und name=Lindau (Bodensee). Als Ortskundiger darfst du gerne eine neue Position für beide Knoten festlegen.
1234christophe (2015-03-13 16:27:39+00:00): emplacement incorrectes
maraf24 (2015-03-14 10:49:45+00:00): Dlaczego zostały usunięte te budynki ?
maraf24 (2015-03-14 10:59:05+00:00): Wypełnienie opisu zmian jest wymagane. Od teraz przy edycjach proszę wpisywać krótkie podsumowanie, np. "dodanie nowych budynków", "uzupełnienie nazw firm" itp.
maraf24 (2015-03-14 10:56:32+00:00): Proszę natychmiast zaprzestać usuwania prawidłowo wyrysowanych budynki i zastępować je swoimi niedokładnie wyrysowanymi.
*Martin* (2015-03-13 19:12:10+00:00): chyby:
- nespojene cesty. Koncove body boli na rovnakom mieste, avsak to je zle. Obe cesty musia zdielat ten isty knocovy bod.
- bol tam zbytocny neuzavrety multipolygon, bez tagov

opravil som tie veci + domapoval dalsie
Stanislav Brabec (2015-04-02 16:52:15+00:00): You added name=Restaurant to https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2970705563

It seems to be incorrect for me:
- You added this name to the house numbering database node. These nodes don't have names. They are constant, assigned to building itself.
- "Restaurant" is not a name of this place.
- amenity=restaurant with a correct name is already created for the building: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/117685210

I think this particular change should be reverted, and if it represents any cache, you should create a new node with proper tags.
gileri (2015-03-13 18:11:52+00:00): Bonjour,

Le tag covered signifie que l'objet est couvert par un autre objet (bâtiment, toit taggé séparément...). Si une plateforme d'arrêt a un tag shelter=yes, il ne faut donc pas mettre covered=yes.

Ensuite il serait intéressant de tagger de manière complète les arrêts de bus de la manière suivante :

Plateforme d'attente (à côté de la route) :
name=*
network=TCL (ou autre)
public_transport=platform
bench=yes|no
shelter=yes|no
covered=yes (si applicable, mais rare)
highway=bus_stop (déprécié car imprécis mais encore souvent utilisé)

Points d'arrêts (sur la route):
name=*
network=TCL (ou autre)
public_transport=stop_position
bus=yes (si applicable)
tram=yes (si applicable)
trolleybus=yes (si applicable)

Et si vous connaissez les relations, une relation type=public_transport, public_transport=stop_area.

Tagger les arrêts de cette manière permet l'usage de ces données par d'autres applications et les rends donc pérennes.

N'hésitez pas à répondre ici ou en message privé si vous avez des questions

Éric
mart3nsite (2015-03-14 12:27:21+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour vos précisions, je m'occuperai de tagger correctement les arrêts de bus de cette ligne prochainement.
Martin
SomeoneElse (2015-03-16 16:51:24+00:00): Something went a bit wrong here - it got created at latitude 0, longitude 0. If you haven't already, you'll need to re-add it at the correct location.
luiswoo (2015-03-15 20:34:37+00:00): Неплохо бы добавлять к junction=roundabout ещё и highway=secondary или любой другой нужный тип дороги -- всё это относится когда roundabout вешается на линию. В противном случае получается изолятор.
Peilscheibe (2015-03-20 13:42:45+00:00): Ich bitte darum, den Konsens einzuhalten und etabliertes tagging zu verwenden. ref=* an Autobahnausfahrten wird auf dem node gesetzt, an dem motorway_link abzweigt. Dokumentiert hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_link
Der von der Autobahn abgehende motorway_link trägt als ref in der Regel den Wert der Autobahn. Es stehen auch so kleine Schildchen rum, auf denen steht das auch drauf. Nie jedoch die Ausfahrtnummer. Bitte rückgängig machen. Außerdem: in ref, destination:ref etc. sollte auch die korrekte Schreibweise verwendet werden, also die mit Leerzeichen nach einer Abkürzung: A 81, B 10 etc.
Nakaner (2015-03-20 19:21:43+00:00): revertiert durch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29622281
maraf24 (2015-03-29 15:12:43+00:00): Co to za ronda jako mulipolygony? W efekcie nic się nie wyświetla na osm.org
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-29 22:23:34+00:00): uwielbiam mapowiczów, którzy na "dzień dobry" grzebią przy sieci drogowe i ją psują.
Maciej Waśniowski (2015-04-03 14:24:34+00:00): Dziękuję za pokazanie błędów, które dzisiaj postaram się poprawić. Każdy ucząc się je popełnienia. I jako nowy mapowiczl prosiłbym o bardziej konstruktywną krytykę, abym w przyszłości unikał podobnych pomyłek. Przepraszam i Pozdrawiam
Darek-J (2015-03-14 13:10:09+00:00): Zgodnie z wiki godziny otwarcia przyjęło się wpisywać w języku angielskim: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:opening_hours
Chodzi o to, żeby dało się te informacje łatwo przetworzyć np. w programach do nawigacji.

Tym razem poprawiłem, ale proszę o tym pamiętać na przyszłość.
czarnystok (2015-03-14 16:14:51+00:00): Dzięki, będę stosował.
gileri (2015-03-13 21:57:16+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention vous avez créé un nœud (pas de jeu de mots :) ) vide ici : 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3397225194

Pouvez-vous le supprimer ?
Genjo (2015-03-17 08:15:57+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est fait merci !
(Avec quel outil vous en êtes vous aperçu ?)
gileri (2015-03-17 11:45:39+00:00): Je suis les changesets sur Lyon/le Grand Lyon avec :

http://zverik.osm.rambler.ru/whodidit/index.html

Ça permet de génerer un flux RSS des nouveaux changesets dans une zone.
bbmiller (2015-03-13 19:23:56+00:00): * The note was #293852
gpross (2015-03-13 19:45:09+00:00): Added the name of the Townhomes (5)
Skippern (2015-03-13 22:12:10+00:00): Se e um teste de importação, deve fazer por o servidor do testes ( api06.dev.openstreetmap.org ) e não no banco vivo. Parecendo que este teste de importação não deu certo, como ja have reclamação do este importe, também este importe não fui discutido na lista talk-br@openstreetmap.org ou no forum.
wille (2015-03-13 22:31:02+00:00): Concordo com Skippern e apoio reversão do changeset pelos motivos citados.
naoliv (2015-03-13 23:30:47+00:00): Zé, tem que fazer assim nesses casos: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Naoliv/Workflows
Note que o processo é bem manual em sua essência (sempre reaproveitando o que já existe e não importando tudo e duplicando os objetos).
E outra coisa que já citaram é não fazer teste direto no servidor (mas sim usar o servidor de testes para isso).
muralito (2015-03-14 01:17:05+00:00): Por favor, tener cuidado con desplazar las calles innecesariamente.
d1g (2015-03-13 23:02:58+00:00): Проблема с данными или условия запрещают в OSM публиковать? Почему пришлось удалять?
vagrant2001 (2015-03-14 05:52:26+00:00): по ошибке закачал данный с mapcam.info вот и убрал чтобы не накладывались с уже существующими и к тому же их все надо привязывать к дороге вручную
d1g (2015-03-14 07:10:54+00:00): Понятно, бывает. По своему региону скажу что данные mapcam.info могли устареть. Т.е. если бы нам и можно было их загрузить, то появились бы устаревшие камеры и несуществующие запреты.

Т.е. не в каждой местности (области, городе, части города) такое нужно делать.
Skippern (2015-03-14 01:15:50+00:00): Can you try to avoid making changes that covers half the world? This should have been split between two change sets
abel801 (2015-03-17 14:47:56+00:00): Sorry for that, I won't happen again. Thanks.