piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jluc95240 (2018-10-31 10:58:40+00:00): Merci pour l'info. Je ne pensais pas que l'on pouvait mettre cycleway tout court.
A ce sujet, quelques communes commencent à mettre en place ces aménagements, avec plus ou moins de réussite car les rues sont étroites par endroit.
Merci
Jean-Luc
jluc95240 (2018-10-31 11:26:29+00:00): Et oui c'est une bande réservée au vélos, dans les rues à sens unique, du coté opposé au sens de circulation, ou dans les rues à double sens, des 2 cotés.
Carto'Cité (2018-10-31 13:49:47+00:00): Merci pour la réponse. 
Du coup on est bien dans le cas M3a du tableau https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bicycle#Bandes_cyclables_sur_les_routes_.C3.A0_sens_unique ?
Est-ce que modifie les rues en question, ou je te laisse faire comme tu connais mieux le terrain ?
Cordialement, Antoine.
jluc95240 (2018-10-31 19:15:20+00:00): Oui c'est bien M3a. Pas de souci, je vais effectuer les modifs.
Cordialement et merci pour ton retour.
Jean-Luc
jluc95240 (2018-11-02 17:30:34+00:00): Bonsoir
Après réflexion, je pense qu'il faut mettre "cycleway:left" au lieu de "cycleway" tout court car la bande cyclable est dans le sens inverse et à gauche du sens du circulation (voir m3A). quand pensez vous ?
Jean-Luc
Carto'Cité (2018-11-04 11:47:23+00:00): Bonjour Jean-Luc,
Effectivement, nous sommes dans le cas M3a, donc on peut mettre cycleway=opposite_lane ou cycleway:left=opposite_lane. La page wiki semble recommander d'utiliser le second choix ; probablement pour permettre d'enrichir l'information avec un cycleway:right=no/lane/track/etc. En pratique on voit généralement simplement cycleway=opposite/opposite_lane/opposite_track/etc. C'est pour cela qu'Antoine précisait que le :left était superflu.
Merci encore pour tes retours.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
viloan (2018-10-27 14:23:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
trigpoint (2018-10-30 12:40:50+00:00): Hi, are you really sure about this? This is an arable field, not a likely place for a survey point.
The object claims a source of NPE, however NPE shows no such object, just a spot height.
Please also use meaningful changeset comments, Surveyed tells me nothing and unless you have actually been here it is also misleading.
Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2018-10-30 12:58:22+00:00): Sorry, found it on bing, a little further east.
Have fixed it, and had assumed NPE included such things.
Cheers Phil
comsomol (2018-10-31 09:54:54+00:00): Hi. Yes, there is a trig point there (ironic, given your username), and yes, it is in an arable field (has cows and a bull in the field currently (or at least, it did last week when I was in the wood adjacent to the east) 
I know of at least some other trig points in arable fields (one near Cambridge at Wandlebury is in a field) so I'm not sure what's so unusual about that.
I can supply a photo taken from approximately 30 metres away if you want evidence of a survey - (I didn't get closer due to the aforementioned bull!)
Sorry about the poorly named changeset -  I was distracted away from editing and had to close the changes in a hurry and was trying to indicate that I'd actually been there to confirm the NPE data (not all trig points survive, sadly)
geri-oc (2020-08-27 14:19:50+00:00): müsste direction=Lübeck nicht destination=Lübeck sein? 
Route U 48
JRCrichton (2018-10-27 14:47:17+00:00): I forgot to change the changeset desc. This one added in parking and some minor edits to the roads and office
viloan (2018-10-27 14:54:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-10-27 21:17:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-10-27 21:19:44+00:00): Beste HenkieMap. In OSM taggen we bij op de reeds bestaande adresnodes. Dus niet op de gebouwen zelf. Het adres vind je op de node bovenin het gebouw.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-10-27 21:32:38+00:00): belangrijkste info overgezet naar Bag node nr 74. Wellicht kun je zelf de betaalmogelijkheden overzetten.
Het duplikaat adres heb ik verwijderd
HenkieMap (2018-10-28 11:52:48+00:00): Beste eggie,

Bedankt voor de extra informatie. Had de handleiding voor "Bewerken met ID" doorlopen en de "Info" buttons bekeken bij "Bewerk object", maar dat was niet genoeg achteraf gezien. Ik ga uw tips meenemen voor de volgende keer! Bedankt! Mvg HenkieMap
maraf24 (2018-11-11 22:50:02+00:00): Ja nie widzę parku przy pomniku Matki Boskiej:
https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/p/AF1QipOWyTf_KK1UjarGgfVoyu05XNTo_FQTNXvYEW87=w408-h544-k-no
Tam jest nieużytek.
highflyer74 (2018-11-01 09:58:24+00:00): Moin Hibenny!

Da Du hier Relationen erstellt bzw. bearbeitet hast, will ich Dir empfehlen, dies lieber mit JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) als Editor zu machen, da sich iD nur sehr bedingt dafür eignet und leider oft dazu führt, dass komplexe Strukturen beschädigt werden. JOSM warnt Dich vor eventuellen Fehlern, hat einen eigenen Relationseditor und ist auch insgesamt komfortabler.

Viele Grüße!
eggie (2018-10-27 21:21:55+00:00): Mooie aanvulling. Parkedits liggen bij OSM onder een vergrootglas. Probeer in het park juist de landuse grass, natural=water en evt. natural=tree op een node te mappen. leissure=pak is alleen een transparant die de functie aangeeft. 
MVG,
eggie
BCNorwich (2018-10-30 14:47:01+00:00): Hi, is this internet_access=wired open to the public or a private installation? In any case, without more information, it is of little use to the OSM database.
Regards Bernard
GuigsyUK (2018-10-27 17:40:22+00:00): I've made Sheepcote St southbound 'no entry' at the new roundabout that's appeared at the Arena car part junction. Is it better to split the link so it's limited access southbound, and a normal one-way road northbound?
Nakaner (2018-10-29 10:38:21+00:00): Hallo Night-Lord,

warum hast du denn die Straße Auberg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638532785) gelöscht?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63930960
Night-Lord (2018-10-29 10:55:50+00:00): Habe nichts gelöscht sondern hinzugefügt ne Zufahrt Straße tat fehlen
dval (2019-01-19 10:48:17+00:00): Здравствуйте! У Вас в СНТ Малахова гора изолят, т.е. дорога с названием, но ниже unclass. или resident., не имеющая связь с основной сетью дорог - http://peirce.gis-lab.info/qa/RU-SVE/routing-map . Откуда Вы брали адреса участков? Не похоже, что они реальны, поскольку в СНТ я не встречал двух участков с одним номером. Я пытался устранить изолят, Но в конце процесса валидатор JOSM сообщил об ошибке наличия участков с одним номером. Я вернул все изменения. За Вами слово.
IgorMagellan (2019-01-19 18:07:15+00:00): Здравствуйте
Ошибки наличия участков с одинаковым номером нет. Только что проверил встроенным валидатором JOSM с включенным модулем проверки тегов "Russian housenumbers" (https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zetx16/Josm-HnumbValidator/master/ru-housenumber.validator.mapcss). Проверьте еще раз этот СНТ. Источник адресов указан в подписи "Источник данных" этого пакета - это egrp365 ( https://egrp365.ru/map/?kadnum=66:59:0101001:606 )  и все эти номера участков вполне реальны.
Этот СНТ и есть в чистом виде изолят, т.к. не предполагает какую-либо маршрутизацию через себя, если я правильно понимаю. Грубо говоря, это тупик. И валидатор сработал только потому, что в проездах highway=service есть name. Такие у них там обозначения: Улица 1, улица 2....  мне так думается. Возможно, у меня недостаточно знаний
dval (2019-01-19 18:25:56+00:00): Здесь существует проблема увязки требований разных частей ОСМ. 
1) В СНТ принято главную улицу обозначать unclas., а все остальные - service. 
2) Если у пути (highway) есть название, то валидатор (ссылка выше) считает ее принадлежащей сети дорог и поэтому считает, что она должна быть не ниже unclas. или residential. Если он видит путь service с названием, то он считает это нарушением своих правил. В случае, если в СНТ нет двух одинаковых addr:housenumber, то адресация в нем делается не по улицам, а по самому СНТ: сам СНТ: place=allotments + allotments=gardening + name=Аврора(пример); дом, участок: addr:place=Аврора + addr:housenumber=1. 
Раз в Вашем случае есть дома (участки) с одинаковыми номерами, то, пожалуй надо всем путям в СНТ присвоить unclass. 
Изолят - не тупик. Изолят - это участок дорог, который не связан с общей сетью дорогой класса unclass. по крайней мере. По ссылке на валидатор об этом можно почитать. Если в области есть изоляты, это снижает рейтинг качества дорожной сети для нужд навигационных приложений.
IgorMagellan (2019-01-19 18:37:06+00:00): Ок, Ради рейтинга придется переделать весь СНТ.  Когда я рисовал, то был не в курсе, как правильно их рисовать. Потом мне подсказали: на полигон place c name, на проезд - highway=residential, на домик - addr:place. Скоро займусь, может это поможет.
us2ivb (2019-01-21 16:15:53+00:00): Здравствуйте. Необязательно все именованные дороги переводить в unclassified. Достаточно будет к именованному service подвести unclassified и это не будет считаться изолятором.
dval (2019-01-21 16:49:41+00:00): Cпасибо! Но надо проверить :)) . И меня (в другом месте) поправляют: если в СНТ есть офф. названная улица, то ее надо считать residential https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:landuse%3Dallotments (хотя мне это кажется не очень логичным). Мне ранее на словах объясняли, что в СНТ могут быть только uncl. и serv., что мне кажется более логичным.
us2ivb (2019-01-21 17:17:56+00:00): Про адресацию в СНТ можно почитать на форуме в этой теме https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=17447 
Еще заметил, если к именованному service подходит именованный service, который в свою очередь соединен с дорогами выше классом, то валидатор не выдает ошибку с изолятором.
PDVSeifert (2018-11-19 09:14:41+00:00): Datenlöschung Verlauf Rudolf-Diesel-Straße auf vorherigen OSM-Stand zurückgesetzt
mavl (2018-11-10 11:56:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64347706, 64349160 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
mavl (2018-11-10 11:56:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64347706, 64349160 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-10-27 20:13:05+00:00): Hello, you should tag this as alley and if 2mts is the height, add it on that tag.
Service applies to: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
freebeer (2019-06-08 06:02:54+00:00): mojn,

your josm didn't perchance warn your changeset was breaking relations like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2416295 - which i've just repaired so far as i can see, in a way likely very different from how it was originally mapped along the lake outline, so no need to take action.

i'm just trying to gather as much background info to help me understand what may have gone titsup with the multitude of damaged unclosed rings thrown up by osmi all across your country, when the element histories allow me to re-create the missing segments.  or better, to try to understand the thinking behind the editor operators, as there seem to be as many ways to map as there are mappers.

thnks
b-jazz (2019-06-08 15:28:39+00:00): Well, it was 7 months ago, so I'm going to have to plead ignorance on whether or not it warned me on this particular case. I've found historically that JOSM does remarkably well handling existing relations when splitting long ways.

Was it my split that broke something, or was it possibly an earlier modification?
freebeer (2019-06-08 21:39:40+00:00): no worries, i don't have the stomach to reverse-engineer things in detail, as the deep history viewer i used caused memory use to balloon to the point where i sacrificed the potlatch child processes to stop the swap and avoid the droid (oooh, better check that cultural reference.  ewww.  yup, i'm old, but we knew that).

what i found interesting is your way cut was not at the lake itself, but at the point just before.  i'm wondering if the lake was continuous with the nodes doing  double duty along part of the shoreline.  i've seen that often enough in my fixit role, and in fact there were four overlapping double-duty nodes where the original outline ended and the new one - well, overlapped.

i bet you have no clue what i'm talking about.  nor do i.

cheers
literan (2018-10-28 15:32:02+00:00): и зачем вы станцию Кунцевская Филевской линии удалили? https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63933439/ придется откатить
Maarten Deen (2018-10-28 07:26:38+00:00): Hi Famiras, please take care of relations when you split ways. If you don't download all objects, the relations on those ways will end up with gaps.
Famiras (2018-10-30 15:44:09+00:00): Hi Marteen, I thought I fixed the relations, apparently that did not work properly. I'm sorry for that. Next time I will take better care.
mueschel (2018-11-08 18:40:48+00:00): Hi,
you also added several ways with a strange tag like "704 = 804". Please have a look.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Constable (2018-10-28 11:18:30+00:00): Ciao Andy, seems like you've been editing quite a lot in this area lately. Please keep in mind that "split roundabouts" are not a wrong thing. In this case I'd have left it split as a relation goes though just a section of it, but with the once-piece roundabout it seems like the whole roundabout is part of the relation. I feel like in this case the single-piece roundabout makes the map loose details and for that reason I'd advise you to restor eit to the previous version. Please don't get me wrong, I think you're doing fine but just wanted to explain you why split roundabouts are not always a bad thing.
Thanks
AndyMIller (2018-10-28 15:58:16+00:00): Ciao Constable. 

Is there a way to restore an edit using ID?

I must admit I'm looking at this now, and thinking 'why did I split the roundabout in the first place?' — the roundabout isn't part of the cycle route.  

The reason why I had thought that splitting a roundabout was a mistake is that the cycle route would need to work in both directions. Should I split the roundabout and include both sections in the relation? This doesn't apply to this edit, but would apply to the next changeset (63934196)
Constable (2018-10-28 17:05:20+00:00): Hi, thanks for your reply. The only way of restoring something using iD is to manually edit the object (roundabout in this case). Actually, you're right about the two directions thing; I was expecting this one to be part of a one-way relation. If this relation works in both direction is completely correct to have it mapped as a single object (as long it doesn't conflict with another relation which gest through that same roundabout).
Ciao
Constable (2018-10-28 11:22:13+00:00): Ciao Andy, thanks for helping us make this map more detailed. If you're working on relations I'd suggest you to use this tool to make sure the relation is not split in sections http://ra.osmsurround.org/
Hope it helps, thanks
AndyMIller (2018-10-28 15:59:40+00:00): Ciao Constable. Thanks. That's a useful tool - there are more gaps than I had realised.
aixbrick (2018-10-28 09:39:13+00:00): Hallo,
bitte schaue dir bei diesem Changeset die Kreuzung nochmal genau an. Nicht an jeder Rechtsabbiegespur befindet sich in der Realität auch eine Ampel. Und die Ampel in der Mitte kann sicherlich auch entfallen.
Generell zu diesem und den weiteren Changesets in Aachen wo du die Ampeln genauer gemappt hast:
- traffic_signals:direction ist unnötig bei Einbahnstraßen.
- traffic_signals = signal soll nicht gesetzt werden, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_signals.
Gruß
aixbrick (2018-10-30 12:18:05+00:00): Nach Kontakt per PN: Kreuzung in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64009463 korrigiert.
chnuessli (2021-12-10 16:11:25+00:00): Sicher, dass das Hard Rock Hotel Davos hier ist?
plennert (2021-12-10 16:24:26+00:00): jep, steht/stand zumindest vor 3 JAhren auf dem Schild im Eingangsbereich.
viloan (2018-10-27 18:36:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
kartler175 (2018-10-29 08:11:50+00:00): Für Routen bitte bestehende Straßen und Wege verwenden, nicht einfach neue Wege "erfinden".
aixbrick (2018-10-28 11:46:03+00:00): Hallo,
es sei mal dahingestellt, ob diese oder auch die in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63925020 hinzugefügte Fläche ein Park darstellen. Es wäre aber schön, wenn du mal auf die Changeset-Diskussionen reagieren könntest (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63911778). Wenn du so weitermachst, wird das wahrscheinlich wieder eine Sperre zur Folge haben und die wird dann möglicherweise länger ausfallen.
Gruß
simon484 (2018-10-28 14:24:01+00:00): Hallo , ich lese mir die Changests auch durch aber weiß meist nicht , was ich drauf antworten soll . Einmal wollte ich unter einem meiner Changesets kommentieren aber irgenwie konnte der Kommentar nicht gesendet werden . Habe es mehrmals versucht .
aixbrick (2018-10-28 16:02:05+00:00): Hallo,
das Antworten hat ja jetzt offenbar geklappt.

>> "Hallo , ich lese mir die Changests auch durch aber weiß meist nicht , was ich drauf antworten soll ." <<
Es kann aber auch nicht Sinn der Sache sein, das dann auszusitzen. Es hat ja einen Grund, wenn dir jemand sagt, dass das, was du da gemappt hast, nicht stimmt/stimmen kann oder ungeeignete Tags enthält. Die richtige Vorgehensweise wäre dann: Die Hinweise annehmen, sich damit auseinandersetzen (Wiki lesen!) und dann die gemachten Fehler korrigieren. Vor allem aber: Daraus lernen und es beim nächsten Mal direkt richtig machen. Und wenn du überhaupt nicht weiterweißt, dann schreibe das ins Changeset oder ins Forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14, einloggen mit OSM-Account) und man wird dir sicherlich helfen.

Mit der Art, wie du es aber im Moment machst (überspitzt formuliert: Daten in OSM reinhauen und andere aufräumen lassen), wirst du irgendwann wieder gesperrt - evtl. auch dauerhaft. Du hattest schon drei Warnschüsse. Das sollte doch eigentlich reichen, oder?

Gruß
mavl (2018-11-08 17:02:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64296808 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
mavl (2018-11-09 17:21:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64330408 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
skquinn (2020-08-31 03:11:33+00:00): Please do not delete address information and building outlines just because the store inside the building closes. There is still a building at 5436 Texas Highway 6 even if you can't get a Whataburger there.
PT-53 (2018-10-30 09:02:41+00:00): Hallo id=2507,
in keep right werden hier Tippfehler-Fehlerhinweise angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=94&error=106125511
und
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=94&error=106125499
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2018-11-07 08:00:15+00:00): Hallo id=2507, 
Du hast für dieses Straßenstück https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/638590783 turn:forward=left|through und turn:lanes:forward=
turn:forward 	left|through
turn:lanes:forward 	 eingetragen. Ist das so richtig ? Im Wiki kann ich keine Erläuterung / Beispiel zu turn:forward finden.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2018-11-22 08:40:09+00:00): Hallo id=2507,
ich warte immer noch auf Antwort bzw. Überarbeitung.
Grüße
PT-53 (2018-10-27 20:27:43+00:00): Hallo id=2507,
warum hast Du diesen Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3127663521/history gelöscht ?
Er war genau in der Mitte dieser Straße eingezeichnet.
Ich habe den Knoten wieder hergestelt!
eggie (2018-10-27 21:33:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2022-10-11 06:19:27+00:00): Hi Radkitt   

Your edits give no sense here,

Outdoor_seating...  ??????
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Doutdoor_seating

I changed this into natural=shrubbery
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=shrubbery

You never reply at questions?  What is the problem.?
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=605093

Greetz,
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-28 17:40:32+00:00): Hi derclaudius, welcome to OSM.

I think your changes should be reviewed by a local contributor. Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63937051
sergeybe (2018-11-11 17:43:56+00:00): На выдумывайте место Балчик-Кая. Оно хорошо известно и на ней стоят ретрасляционные пластины.
В OSM запрещено брать данные с Wikimapia. Ихняя лицензия не позволяет.
Откатываю эту точку.