piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gscholz (2021-04-12 05:17:47+00:00): Hi naoguo,
your recent edits have added a big number of errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-90.59677&lat=14.58169&zoom=15&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-09 13:37:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 104396077 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
blackboxlogic (2021-04-13 15:57:42+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! We don't abbrev. street suffixes in OSM so I've changed this back to "Nuthatch Lane". Please ask if you have any questions. -Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102673457
hauke-stieler (2021-04-17 19:33:22+00:00): Hi,

bei den Öffnungszeiten bitte aufs Format achten: Statt "Mo-So" wäre "Mo-Su" (also englische Kürzel für Wochentage) korrekt. Habs entsprechend mal korrigiert.

Grüße
Hauke
blackboxlogic (2021-04-13 16:02:24+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!
There was already a node with this address, so I've merged it with the thing you added. In the future, please consider just editing the existing adding a new one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102674006
mueschel (2021-04-10 11:04:33+00:00): Hi,
could you check the buildings you added today?
There are plenty with a "USE1_DESC=Residential" tag that looks like a mistake.
iandees (2021-04-10 13:44:46+00:00): Yep absolutely. I'll clean that up.
blackboxlogic (2021-04-13 16:08:55+00:00): Thanks for adding important features! We're missing a lot of this in Maine. I see you took a few tries to get address details in the right format but the details look correct now. -Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102674275
blackboxlogic (2021-04-13 16:13:25+00:00): Hi. There was already an address node where you added this. Please edit existing elements instead of duplicating them.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102674433
blackboxlogic (2021-04-13 16:14:42+00:00): I'm guess that you added this again because it didn't how up on your map. It can take a day to a week for the map tiles to update. Be patient, it will show up. Please ask if you have questions. -Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102674436
gscholz (2021-04-12 05:17:42+00:00): Hi naoguo,
your recent edits have added a big number of errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-90.59677&lat=14.58169&zoom=15&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 11:37:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103098788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in the USA by a mapper trying to evade a block - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4931 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 11:37:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103098788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in the USA by a mapper trying to evade a block - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4931 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 11:37:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103098788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in the USA by a mapper trying to evade a block - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4931 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 11:37:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103098788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in the USA by a mapper trying to evade a block - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4931 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 11:37:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103098788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in the USA by a mapper trying to evade a block - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4931 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 11:37:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103098788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in the USA by a mapper trying to evade a block - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4931 .
SomeoneElse (2021-04-10 00:48:09+00:00): Removing information allegedly added from Google.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 23:50:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103555949, 103556399 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
MxxCon (2021-04-10 03:09:49+00:00): Hello.
Please try to contain each changeset limited to a smaller geographic area. Unfortunately, the way OSM works, your 3 communication towers notified everybody who watches the map for changes in the Eastern US. 😅 If you were to make 3 separate changesets, only people local to those areas would be notified. 👍
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 10:59:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103628042 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user (unlikely secondary roads, farm tracks to fields as unclassified) are still problematic.
ovruni (2021-04-10 05:26:19+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha retirado el nodo de una institución inicial [0] para agregar un área con menos información que el nodo original (como dirección, isced:level, ele, ref, source), de la misma forma en su conjunto de cambios 102677509 se han agregado algunas etiquetas de barrio, pero también se han retirado los valores de usos de suelo, los cuales cumplen roles diferentes. Por este motivo he recuperado las etiquetas.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5596892719/history
Kha_nam (2021-04-12 05:23:21+00:00): Hi wuellen 
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with service road 
kindly check with way 34690323
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102770961
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102676390
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 23:51:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103555949, 103556399 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
stephankn (2021-06-30 07:01:16+00:00): do not add imaginary stream way 928723500
stephankn (2021-06-30 07:00:39+00:00): do not add imaginary waterway (way 928723778)
stephankn (2021-06-30 06:57:02+00:00): do not add imaginary streams, unconnected to anything. way 928723836
stephankn (2021-06-30 06:48:27+00:00): do not tag roads as stream
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 23:50:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103555949, 103556399 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 13:55:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103536066, 103537436 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 23:50:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103555949, 103556399 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 23:51:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103555949, 103556399 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
MxxCon (2021-04-10 03:40:50+00:00): Hello.
A small suggestion regarding "disused:" prefix. As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused: it should be added to all tags that have business-specific info, not just biz type(ie name, website, phone, cuisine, etc).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102677602
hshore29 (2021-04-10 03:45:21+00:00): Thanks for the tip!
Ludhiana (2021-04-10 15:13:26+00:00): Why have you deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/314943211/history ?
boopington (2021-04-10 20:11:30+00:00): because there isn't one singular building taking up the entire property and thats how it was rendering.
TTPC_Checksum (2021-04-13 11:59:21+00:00): Wouldn't it be better to remove the building tag and leave the park?
boopington (2021-04-14 04:57:17+00:00): Yes it would
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 23:51:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103555949, 103556399 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Dodko (2022-02-13 12:01:27+00:00): Keď vkladáte budovy treba si dať záležať aby z toho neboli krivé lichobežníky a kosoštvorce.
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=102678027
When inserting buildings, care must be taken not to make crooked trapezoids and diamonds.
AgusQui (2021-04-12 02:40:00+00:00): Hola Raquel Sava, el otro día te deje un mensaje en uno de tus conjuntos de cambios y no respondiste. Ocasionalmente serás contactado por otros mapeadores acerca de ediciones que hayas hecho. Por favor, no les ignores. Si el otro mapeador se ha tomado la molestia de consultar tus ediciones e interesarse por ellas, merece una respuesta. Esto es un proyecto comunitario. 
Respecto a este tramo de Congreso, tienes razón. El otro día anduve por ahí y verifiqué personalmente (lo más importante en OSM) que se angosta luego de Cabildo. Y que además el nombre no incluye el prefijo Avenida, que veo que correjiste. Pero olvidaste corregir las numeraciones, ahora lo hago yo.
Te recomiendo que ingreses al grupo de la comunidad en Telegram y veas la wiki de la comunidad Argentina: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Argentina
Saludos.
andrewwiseman (2022-06-16 18:17:42+00:00): Hi, you mapped multiple features here in rural Haiti as railroads. They are certainly not railroads. Please make sure to pay attention to the project instructions and don't map things that don't make sense.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
jalaska (2021-05-19 17:54:38+00:00): Hi, I noticed you are a new mapper in Alaska, welcome :)! Just for you information, the Bing Aerial imagery layer is quite outdated in the FNSB area, but there is a highres aerial imagery layer from FNSB GIS that is from 2020:
tms:https://gisportal.fnsb.us/image/rest/services/Imagery_2020_Pictometry_Fairbanks/MapServer/tile/{zoom}/{y}/{x} 

There is a building now in the parking lot you mapped in this changeset. Feel free to contact me if you have questions. Best, Judith
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
GOwin (2021-04-10 08:08:02+00:00): Ayos! Maraming salamat sa pag-ambag ng datos sa OpenStreetMap. Welcome to OSM.

Kung interesado kang makipag-kwentuhan, o kung meron kang mga katanungan, subukan mo ang mga nakalistang local community channels dito: https://osm.org/wiki/PH
Kha_nam (2021-04-16 09:26:28+00:00): Hi BYC Malaking Pulo
created the residential and service ways as per the imagery kindly refer way 931339086
way 931339085
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103047033
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102679347
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 23:50:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103555949, 103556399 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
gscholz (2021-04-15 05:12:28+00:00): Hi Jeancarlo Hidalgo,
this changeset has destroyed several boundary relations:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-84.04497&lat=9.79151&zoom=12

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102679873

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
gscholz (2021-04-18 13:39:47+00:00): Hi Jeancarlo Hidalgo, 
this error still exits, can you please fix it? Can you please respond here?
Guido
gscholz (2021-05-06 04:48:07+00:00):     Hi Jeancarlo Hidalgo,
    this error still exits, can you please fix it? Can you please respond here?
    Guido
kartonage (2021-04-10 12:11:42+00:00): Hej and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

it seems like you have deleted almost all buildings before mapping new buildings or improved versions. (as seen in http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102679919). Please try to improve existing buildings even when they do not seem at the right position. Deleting objects to redraw them in the same way is not fair to previous mappers and not useful when looking at object history.
Thank you.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-24 23:51:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103555949, 103556399 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits are still clearly problematical.
Becky Candy (2021-06-14 14:50:04+00:00): Please remember to square the buildings by selecting the buildings and pressing  the key Q,zoom in and hit each corner accurately with a left click and square at end,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102680377
Becky Candy (2021-06-14 15:26:13+00:00): Zoom in and hit each corner accurately with a left click and square at end by pressing the key Q,thank you for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102680519
TagaSanPedroAko (2021-04-10 05:51:02+00:00): Clarification: comment should have said “Kitchener, ON”
Friendly_Ghost (2021-04-11 13:38:06+00:00): Hi UsefulRabbit. Would you mind using, or at least aligning to the RI 2019 imagery when mapping Aquidneck Island? It's available in JOSM and I could get you a WMS link as well.

Kind regards,
Casper
MKnight (2021-04-10 09:23:25+00:00): Moin,
ich habe die capacity wieder entfernt und stattdessen an den Gesamtparkplatz angehängt. 

gibt iD eine Fehlermeldung für Einzelplätze aus? Das wäre dann wahrscheinlich falsch; Im Wiki steht, dass capacity nur gesetzt werden soll wenn >1
MKnight (2021-04-10 09:25:32+00:00): Ok, grad selbst geschaut, iD meint, da wäre ein Fehler. Evtl. schreib ich ein Ticket dazu.
Jorisbo (2021-04-10 15:00:34+00:00): Hallo mknight, danke fur deine arbeit. Grusse, Joris
ravali_78 (2021-04-12 11:10:17+00:00): Hi mapper,
I have fixed the alignment ,as building polygon overlapping with residential highway way 28071308 kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102798169
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102681309
Jean-Marc Liotier (2021-05-01 20:18:59+00:00): Your identical size and identical orientation buildings copy-pasted with complete disregard for reality are horrible.
ravali_78 (2021-04-12 11:07:33+00:00): Hi mapper,
I have fixed the alignment ,as building polygon overlapping with residential highway way 115065406 kindly check with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102797672.
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102681438
mavl (2021-04-11 12:27:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет адрес, но такой адрес никто не сможет найти.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses
Успение Тобольск (2021-04-11 12:48:49+00:00): Это торговый павильон с именно таким адресом и названием
mavl (2021-04-11 12:53:57+00:00): Это не торговый павильон. Во всяком случае, на карте это просто одна из точек на дороге.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3189591619  
  
Адрес оформлен неправильно (он указан в теге name, который используется для названий, а не адресов) и никто не сможет его найти.
Успение Тобольск (2021-04-11 12:57:28+00:00): Тюменская обл. Город Тобольск, 3б микрорайон, 32 В. Это правильный юридический адрес.
mavl (2021-04-11 13:07:18+00:00): Никто не утверждал, что это неправильный адрес. Адрес на карте OpenStreetMap оформлен неправильно и поэтому его никто не сможет использовать.
Успение Тобольск (2021-04-11 13:10:46+00:00): Как оформить правильно?
mavl (2021-04-11 13:18:02+00:00): Как написано в статье, ссылка на которую добавлена в первом комментарии этого обсуждения.
Успение Тобольск (2021-04-11 13:22:53+00:00): Всё сделано правильно, ищите правильно по точке и найдете
PhysicsArmature (2021-04-10 06:10:56+00:00): My bad, forgot to write my sources of Ariel imagery.
dktue (2021-04-15 09:18:58+00:00): Gebäude der Feuerwehr Lustnau, oder?
Qwave (2021-04-15 10:07:27+00:00): Natürlich.
Friendly_Ghost (2021-04-10 21:51:18+00:00): Beste stroet43,

Ik zie dat je xenos.nl hebt gemapt als website=*. Aangezien het hier de website van het merk Xenos betreft, verzoek ik je om hier brand:website=* van te maken, zodat website=* gebruikt kan worden om webpagina's van individuele filialen toe kunnen voegen.

Mvg,
Casper
user_36790 (2021-04-11 18:16:15+00:00): Ik begrijp het niet waarom de webpagina met het locale adres nodig is.
De vestiging staat op de kaart, je kan hem daar aanwijzen. als je de poi selecteert dan komt hij te voorschijn met zijn adres en wordt de route er naar toe opgegeven.
Als je zoekt naar Xenos, Ede dan wordt hij ook gevonden.
Waarvoor heb je dan de webpagina met zijn adres voor nodig?
Friendly_Ghost (2021-04-13 20:33:57+00:00): Hallo Stroet,

brand:website=* is de tag die voor het merk bedoeld is, in dit geval dus https://www.xenos.nl/ . De tag website=* kan dan gebruikt worden voor pagina's van de filialen, zoals https://www.xenos.nl/winkels/amersfoort-langestraat-87 . 

Natuurlijk valt één van beide tags weg te laten, maar we maken een onderscheid tussen de tags om mappers de gelegenheid te geven beide pagina's te mappen om zo ook de gebruikers van de data beide opties te bieden. 

Zal ik de tags voor je wijzigen, of doe je dit liever zelf?

Mvg,
Casper
user_36790 (2021-04-27 03:46:06+00:00): Beste Casper,
Voorlopig ben ik tevreden naar hoe de Xenos-winkels nu op de kaart staan.
Maar als iemand ruimte voor verbetering ziet, veel plezier ermee.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
BCNorwich (2021-04-14 07:15:02+00:00): Hi, Please be careful you are making some duplicate highways. I've removed this duplicate.

Regards Bernard.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-22 10:13:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105126505 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-05-22 10:13:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 105126505 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
san013 (2021-04-12 04:10:03+00:00): а фото нету камней?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-27 21:15:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103731931 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still somewhat problematic.
BCNorwich (2021-04-14 07:17:07+00:00): Hi, Please be careful this is a duplicated highway so I've removed it.

regards Bernard.