piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Wilmer Osario (2021-08-23 21:44:37+00:00): Está mal etiquetado, debe ser un [highway=service]
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-08-24 17:11:42+00:00): ok, I created some notes about missing roads in Venezuela, if you want to check: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-country-custom?c=Venezuela&query=open
eggie (2021-08-23 20:22:27+00:00): Lijkt me inderdaad beter zo...
Gr eggie
scott113341 (2021-08-23 20:13:00+00:00): Should have mentioned in the note: I used four GPS traces to add the trail (both a friend and I recorded both hiking in, and hiking out).
StefanHRT (2021-08-24 00:01:03+00:00): Hallo,
Wenn Du im Freizeitpark weitere Pfade mappst, setz mal bitte auch bicycle=no, da dort das Radfahren verboten ist. Alle Wege, wo es erlaubt ist, sind bereits hinterlegt ;) Danke und VG
abakus_uploader (2021-08-23 22:31:49+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Hugoren Martinako (2024-08-26 15:45:29+00:00): Boas!
O cambio que fixeches desta fronteira é erróneo: non coincide cos límites do IGN, nin cos do visor da Xunta, nin tampouco con Catastro (que tampouco ten autoridade sobre límites).

Aquí podes ver o histórico do límite: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/682291733

Por que os cambiaches? Aínda que sexan raros, non poden ser modificados aleatoriamente.

Un saúdo
lafita17 (2024-09-02 19:28:44+00:00): Boa tarde, cando fixen o cambio estaba seguindo un mapa do catastro desactualizado, de feito, dende o editor de OSM coa capa do Catastro aínda está mal. Despois cambiei de fontes e non me lembrei de cambialo aquí (e de seguro noutros lugares). Grazas polo apunte. Un saúdo.
eggie (2021-08-24 05:44:29+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_11435438 (2021-08-25 02:18:58+00:00): Partially reverted in changeset 110199361 because of deletion of place nodes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110137077
janwillem99 (2021-09-27 20:36:14+00:00): Why did you remove my river?
Lee Carré (2021-08-23 23:28:08+00:00): “Jersey updates”

Care to be more specific? Looks like you mostly added several buildings.
blackadder (2021-08-24 08:14:21+00:00): Yep, staying in one of them for a few days
Lee Carré (2021-08-24 10:21:47+00:00): Spiffy; enjoy.

I had assumed that this was armchair-mapping, since source != survey.

Thanks; we're rather lacking on the building-outline front (among many other features).
blackadder (2021-08-24 12:25:50+00:00): Always try to add a bit here and there when I visit. Will add what I can.
Cheers
Andy
carfog81 (2021-08-24 18:09:57+00:00): Hola, pro favor ser más cuidadoso en la edición de las relaciones tipo multipolígono
Leo Slager (2021-08-25 10:16:14+00:00): Dag robert, 
Je hebt hier een highway van de kaart verwijderd door de tags van de highway te wijzigen naar een artwork.
Nou is een weg, de Osdorper Ban, geen kunstwerk.
De schade aan de kaart zal ik repareren door deze changeset te reverten.
Wees in het vervolg een beetje voorzichtig bij het selecteren en wijzigen van elementen op de kaart.
Leo Slager (2021-08-25 10:20:13+00:00): Reverted with my changeset 110221155
Leo Slager (2021-08-25 10:24:12+00:00): Hier kun jouw wijziging bekijken:
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110137562
pilotrobert (2021-08-25 20:25:40+00:00): Beste Leo

Excuses, en zeer bedankt voor je opmerkingen en voor de reparatie.

Ik weet niet of je bekend bent met de Osdorper Ban, maar je opmerking dat dit geen kunstwerk is

is zeer treffend.


groet,

Robert
ovruni (2021-08-23 21:32:36+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han unido nodos de interpolaciones, un negocio a la interpolación y además se han agregado varios nombres en mayúsculas omitiendo el mensaje que le había dejado anteriormente sobre el uso de caracteres en los nombres [0], por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109055356
aweech (2021-08-24 18:08:27+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. In OSM, the access=no tag means that not even the landowners use the way. access=private means that the way is open to the landowners and their guests. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dprivate for more information. I have checked the edits you made last night and fixed them accordingly.
user_1566574 (2021-08-28 09:18:41+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/690872712, s'agit-il d'un hameau ?
(Si oui, ajouter place=hamlet – si vous ne savez pas comment, dites-le-moi.)

Merci d'avance !
bxl-forever (2021-08-24 11:20:54+00:00): What about this one?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7234433734/history

It looks like @Thierry1030, who lives in that area, recently surveyed it and located it somewhere else.  (Check his latest comment.)
user_2008655 (2022-02-25 03:21:02+00:00): why not apply "disused:XXX" instead, since the fact this route is abandoned?
user_2008655 (2022-03-03 09:40:48+00:00): @Andre68 ^^
Andre68 (2022-03-03 18:44:47+00:00): If this route is really disused than go ahead and mark it as disused... But marking it as coastline was definitely wrong and since the mapper was a newby this very much looked as a bad try.
ovruni (2021-08-23 22:10:49+00:00): Hola, le habia escrito anteriormente sin respuesta sobre vías con man_made=courtyard sin respuesta y en este conjunto de cambios nuevamente se han cambiado a esa etiqueta, por lo que proceso a revertir el conjunto de cambios, con la esperanza de que pueda contactarse por este medio o a la comunidad mediante el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos.  https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
aTarom (2021-12-26 11:20:11+00:00): Buenas, una pregunta, los nombres Corriol CDR Extended, Sendero PCR ... Se tratan de nombres de uso mtb? de ser así existe la etiqueta específica 'mtb:name' en vez del 'name'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

Saludos
Juan Carlos del Pino García (2021-12-27 16:40:49+00:00): Son nombres dados a esos senderos para así poder definirlos y referirse a ellos cuando se circula por ellos en MTB. No son estrictamente de uso MTB, ya que también son de uso pedestre; pero así puede algun Biker referirse a ellos por un nombre.
Tendré en cuenta la etiqueta 'mtb:name'. 
Gracias por la aclaración. Un saludo.
Lee Carré (2021-08-24 14:21:42+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Andrew Kvalheim (2021-09-09 18:53:41+00:00): Here N 100th St was disconnected
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110139307
BCNorwich (2021-08-24 06:33:30+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I wonder is it the short section of highway that's named St Peters Mews or the building? The name could be added. Secondly, it would be good to add the gate as that's a physical barrier to the highway.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
tdcorrie (2021-08-24 16:53:00+00:00): Thank you Bernard. As you suggest I have added the street name (it is signed on the side of the wall) and a node with barrier=gate tag. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110185042
Regards,
Thomas
SomeoneElse (2021-11-11 23:01:59+00:00): See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110097966 .I've deleted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113672192 . Please do not add fictional data to OpenStreetMap.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
habi (2021-08-24 07:57:53+00:00): Hey Kkairri

In this changeset you introduced some relations with the tag 'official__name'.
Should this not be 'official_name', without the double-underscore?

Greetings from Switzerland,
habi

PS: I came here from https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
Kkairri (2021-08-25 15:38:33+00:00): Thank you for your information.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-11 23:01:47+00:00): See comments on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110097966 .I've deleted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113672192 . Please do not add fictional data to OpenStreetMap.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
adrianojbr (2021-09-23 00:38:53+00:00): Olá, Pegasus21. Por que criar esses pequenos segmentos na cabeceira das pontes?
Pegasus21 (2021-09-23 14:22:08+00:00): Good morning adrianojbr, As our standard, we follow the OSM Wiki which states "It is good practice to not let a bridge terminate at a road junction or similar." This can be found on the Wiki for bridges here. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge
In this case, I didn't see the man made bridge feature that was attached to the bridge which is the correct way to tag this scenario. 
And I will go back and fix this. Thanks for bringing this to my attention.
adrianojbr (2021-09-23 14:52:48+00:00): Pode deixar que eu corrijo. Abraço!
Fizzie-DWG (2021-11-08 00:14:46+00:00): G'day Aalbers. I've just been doing some mapping in Blackbutt, Qld, after having a break up there & noticed that part of your mapping of the old Brisbane Valley Railway line in Blackbutt doesn't match the line of the Rail Trail on the ground? https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=17/-26.88259/152.10173. Did the Railway have a siding track around Blackbutt Station at one time? Thanks, Graeme
Aalbers69 (2021-11-19 11:49:47+00:00): Graeme - I mapped the old line from what I could see in the aerial photos. It appears clear to me that some of the alignment of the current trail is too sharp to exactly follow the old rail line (bike and walkers can change direction faster than trains).
Fizzie-DWG (2021-11-19 22:00:10+00:00): That explains it. Thanks!
mrjams (2021-08-23 23:28:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mrjams/traces/3794309
ovruni (2021-08-23 23:38:11+00:00): De la misma forma que le había escrito en 109065126 sobre los niveles y pisos. Revierto este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
ovruni (2021-08-23 23:48:03+00:00): En este conjunto de cambios se han agregado algunos niveles que no coinciden las alturas, por lo que he revertido este conjunto de cambios. Por favor pongase en contacto mediante las direcciones que le he indicado. Saludos
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:13:46+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
aweech (2021-08-24 17:40:42+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thank you for your contributions! I reviewed this edit, as you requested. To answer your question about mapping trails in washes, there isn't a one-size-fits-all solution. In a wide wash, trails often favor one side over the other, and in that case it makes sense to draw the trail on that bank. In narrower areas or where there isn't a favored side, then the stream and the trail can share nodes.
scott113341 (2021-09-06 20:20:07+00:00): Hi aweech, thanks for reviewing! I will go back and take a look at joining nodes with the wash for a handful of sections. Mostly, there is an established trail outside of the streambed (though dry, the sand is more difficult to walk on), but there are some sections where there is separate trail. Thanks again!
ovruni (2021-08-23 23:49:57+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado descripciones en la etiqueta nombre, por favor revisar https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
Saludos
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:14:01+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:01:51+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha movido nodos de intersección de calles, lo que genera un cruce varias vías. Procedo a revertir este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:14:21+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:04:25+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambio se menciona que se corrige el dibujado, pero se han retirado otras etiquetas. Por este motivo procedo a revertir su conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:15:52+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:13:37+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:16:06+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
bxl-forever (2021-08-24 11:05:40+00:00): Hello,

It seems like you wanted to draw Infrabel Academy as an area.  This is a good idea but I think there is a little mistake in your multipolygons.  iD is really buggy because it apparently does not warn you when you create invalid 1-member multipolygons, like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11733074

An ordinary way for this building will be more appropriate, while transferring the description and operator tag to the area (way 975840095).

Would you mind fixing this?
JhowieNitnek (2021-08-24 11:59:48+00:00): Done
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:15:32+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:17:56+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:24:42+00:00): Hola, en este conjuntos de cambios se ha agregado solamente el texto "Altura", el cual no explica sobre los cambios realizados, por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos conjuntos de cambios.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:18:32+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
i2004 (2021-08-26 01:06:22+00:00): ahi se va a cosntruir un tunel
serock (2021-08-26 17:21:20+00:00): Hola, ya corregí el cambio, gracias y saludos !!!
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:35:25+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
ovruni (2021-08-24 00:27:56+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
ovruni (2021-08-24 01:06:15+00:00): Hola, he notado que se han realizado diferentes ediciones del mismo tipo por la misma zona, lo cual indica que es parte de un conjunto de ediciones organizadas, por favor revise las directrices de ediciones organizadas y siga los pasos que allí se indican.
Saludos

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Directrices_de_edici%C3%B3n_organizada
bxl-forever (2021-12-13 17:03:52+00:00): Hello,

I hope this major change was discussed with the community.  I couldn’t find a topic about it, perhaps I missed that.

This would make the Charleroi network stand out completely away from all other Belgian networks.

For instance, the ÖPNVKarte layer will render those lines in a different colour from their counterparts in Brussels, Oostende and other cities.

Even the Belgian coast tram which looks closer to Light Rail is merely "route=tram" in OSM.

Best regards.
Arflha (2022-01-11 13:49:14+00:00): Sorry for this late reply, I open a new topic right away.
mueschel (2021-08-24 08:45:03+00:00): Hi
you used a strange tag here, "vcgi:e911-addresses:esiteid". I assume this should be something like a 'ref' tag. Please check this.
jared (2021-08-24 12:13:02+00:00): Hi mueschel.  Thanks for your comment.  This tag is designed to provide a connection to a dataset that is maintained by the Vermont Center for Geographic Information.  My hope is to use this key to track changes and additions to the dataset, and update OSM accordingly.
At this point, I consider it experimental. I'm testing this out now by adding the tag to Solar farms in Vermont.  If it proves useful, I will propose the expansion of its use within the Vermont mapping community.
I've previously brought this up on the local-vermont Slack channel.  To prevent any additional questions or confusion, I've also just now added a note to the Vermont OSM wiki page.
This is my first time using such a tag, so if you have other suggestions of how to properly document it, please let me know.
Thanks.
mueschel (2021-08-24 12:49:49+00:00): I'd recommend using ref:vcgi or, if you need to be more specific something like 
ref:vcgi:XYZ  (I don't know if 'e911' has some actual meaning here).
jared (2021-08-24 15:36:07+00:00): Let me know if you have additional details about how ref is used like this, or how it would be beneficial, as I'm unfamiliar with its usage.  I didn't find much beyond the wiki page <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref> The description and examples do not match what I'm trying to do. 
I'm following the convention that I first came across with the New York state address point import with a syntax of:
source:dataset-name:field-name=value
It is intended for future automation, or semi-automatic change tracking, and gives a clear view of where the ID value originates from. 
My original values were more verbose, with the intention of making it clearer to people that happen to come across it, but the feedback from the Vermont OSM community was to shorten it, and document it on the Vermont OSM wiki page. Thanks.
mueschel (2021-08-24 15:51:26+00:00): Yeah, we're missing some handy documentation on how to create new tags. The scheme I propose would be inline with e.g. ref:linz:building_id
This is also mentioned on the Key:ref page in the Wiki. 'linz' is the dataset and 'building_id' the field name.

There's also the approach to add a country code into the tag, to be able to disentangle local ref numbers from each other in case somewhere else a similar abbreviation is used, like in ref:GB:uprn.
In your case that could be ref:US-VT:vcgi 

I think it's very helpful to have all kind of reference numbers in one common namespace, prefixed with 'ref:' and a region code.
This allows others, not from the same region or not aware of the sources you use (like me) to easily see what this tag represents
jared (2021-08-24 16:11:11+00:00): Since I haven't used ref tags before, I don't understand how prepending ref makes it clearer what the tag represents.  For example, I don't know what ref:linz:building_id or ref:GB:uprn represent.  My first instinct would be to search the OSM wiki, but having the "ref" prefix doesn't make its representation any clearer.  
I'm generally in agreement that more verbose, namespaced tags will prevent name collision, but this goes against the feedback I was provided in the local-vermont slack group, so perhaps I can go back to them to "buy-in".  
My take away is that, practically speaking, it makes the most sense for a tag to have its own Wiki page, and if a tag is already in use (assuming it isn't super generic), that an alternative unique tag be used and documented instead.  That seems like a convention that, for better or worse, is already in place.
mueschel (2021-08-24 16:31:26+00:00): Sure, there should be a documentation in the Wiki for each tag. But, a generic scheme helps:
If I see a tag starting 'ref:US....' I immediately know that it's a local reference number. Then I can decide if I want to know the details (and search the Wiki) or not.

If I see your tag, I have no idea what it might be. I see '911' and 'address' - so is it some kind of emergency contact? So the value might be a phone number? Oh, it says 'id' at the very end, so it might be some reference number.

You also have to take into account that these tags will be seen by everybody using OSM. Say, someone creating a map of power infrastructure needs to decide which information to include and which to drop. They might decide to take every 'ref:...' tag and show this in a separate section but they would need a dedicated look-up table whether to include your custom tag or not.

Please, use a 'ref' prefix for any reference number. It makes the life of every data consumer so much easier.
ovruni (2021-08-24 01:37:51+00:00): En este conjunto de cambios se ha restaurado la zona a la versión anterior previo al vandalismo realizado. Ver detalles en https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pe/2021-August/000891.html
MxxCon (2021-08-24 02:53:36+00:00): Hello.
In this edit you deleted "area" tag from 2 subway platforms, in essence turning them from platforms into lines. Was this intended?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110142123
Marmanvii (2021-08-24 02:13:27+00:00): Geometry*