piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToniE (2020-05-04 07:40:51+00:00): Hello Meinew,

'ref' being part of 'name' is normal and required for public transport routes according to public_transport:version = 2,

Kindly see the definitions.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Public_Transport&oldid=625726#Route

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport#Service_routes

Best regards,
Toni
Meinew (2020-05-06 16:17:13+00:00): Hello Toni,
Thank you for the link ! :)
The issue I tried to fix was that initially the names contained the french and german references separated by a ";" that made checkers to see it as two different names for the same routes.
I put the refs back again in the names as explained but separated by a " - " instead f the ";". I hope I would be good enough. Otherwise do you know how I had to do ? (I did not find any documentaton about double refs for the same object)

Sorry for the mess.... :(
Best,
Meinew
ToniE (2020-05-07 07:13:43+00:00): Hello Meinew,

no wories, your intentions were good.

Actually, AFAIK, die habit is:

- if the 'ref' has two values, because there are two 'network's involved, then we can use '/' (wiithout blanks around it) to separate the ref (like TVG xxx/ICE yyy). We should then define also define ref:TGV=xxx and ref:ICE=yyy (or so as already done).

- if the 'ref' has two different numbers but from same 'network' the we separate them by ';' in 'ref' and 'name' (w/o blanks around it), like "101;106". Yes validators may complain about that for 'name', so what?

Secondly, the PTv2 specification says, that 'name' for 'route' Relations should follow the form:

1.) name = "... ref: from => to' or 

2.) name = "... ref: from => via1 ... => to"

The second only to show variants of routes when they have a common 'from' and 'to', and only those 'via' values which are needed to show the different stops the use.

I'll check that during the next days.

Regarding name, name:de, name:fr ...

Someone from Poland working on Flixbus proposed to use the following schema:

name = "...: Paris => Strasbourg => München"

name:de = "...: Paris => Strasburg => München"

name:fr = ...: Paris => Strasbourg => Munich"

i.e. in 'name' write the name of the Cities in their home-country form.

BTW: do you know PTNA - Public Transport Network Analysis?

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/

You can find these TGV/ICE in Germany, the top level entry.

Section 2.1.1 are ICEs, Section 3.1 are TGVs which touch German ground.

But you can see, that they do not follow the '/' but rather the ';' separation rule.

Best regards
Toni
ToniE (2020-05-07 07:25:34+00:00): Hi,

sorry but the current form for 'ref' and 'ref:*' which I wrote here is wrong and also those in the relations could be improved:

ref = TGV 101/ICE 83

"ref:DB = ICE 83" should be "ref:DB InterCityExpress = ICE 83"


"ref:SNCR = TGV 101" should be "ref:SNCF TGV = TGV 101"

"ref:*" ... the '*' should show a complete part of the value of 'network' or 'network:short'

But I don't know whether blanks are allowed in 'keys' - I don't think so.

Br
Toni
user_5359 (2021-01-03 15:48:16+00:00): Hello! From which country or government area is the border drawn here. Is this not rather a coastline?

Bonjour. Quel est le pays ou la zone gouvernementale dont la frontière est tirée d'ici. N'est-ce pas plutôt un littoral ?
Supaplex (2020-05-03 16:52:23+00:00): 不好意思，rest_area並不是指登山步道旁休息長椅，而是公路邊有停車場，有廁所的地方
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84565212
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:21:04+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:21:22+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_2066394 (2020-05-05 14:16:05+00:00): bei geschlossenen geschäften gerne ein lifecycle prefix dazugeben, dann bleibt der ort nachvollziehbar

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84566409
VA00 (2020-05-10 04:26:19+00:00): Części przejazdów na LK Kraków-Katowice już nie ma, proszę przed edycją sprawdzać historię obiektów i komentarze! Zdjęcia  nieaktualne!
sorcrosc (2020-05-25 21:32:06+00:00): Ciao.
In quest'area hai creato percorsi separati affiancati per pedoni e ciclisti. È corretto?
Sembrano invece percorsi misti, che vanno mappati con una way unica con gli attributi per entrambe le categorie.
Puoi controllare per favore?
Grazie
TéZ (2020-05-25 22:36:38+00:00): Ciao.
In effetti quello che dici è ragionevole. Mi sono attaccato a qualcosa di esistente ma direi sia sbagliato: il senso non è quello di percorsi 'affiancati' ma di un unico percorso foot+bicycle designated, segregated=yes, direi ...
Se sei d'accordo correggerei domani.
Grazie mille e scusa per l'inconveniente
WoodWoseWulf (2020-05-04 20:49:10+00:00): Hi Robbie,
You deleted a lot of buildings in Kooindah Waters - have they all been demolished?
ToniE (2020-05-03 15:19:09+00:00): Mmh, aber so ist es garnicht mehr erlaubt, da bicycle=no. Ist das vor Ort verifiziert, dass man hier nur berauf mit dem Fahrad darf? vor 8 Monaten hatte ich das geändert, da ein anderer Mapper dieses verneinte.
eggie (2020-05-03 15:13:03+00:00): Dag Loekie... Vaak bestaan die fietspaden uit fijn korrelmateriaal. We noemen dat dan gravel, maar taggen het als surface= fine_gravel
Door echte gravel is niet door te komen met een fiets.
Kijk je nog even, want nu routeert het als onverhard.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-05-03 15:14:40+00:00): Kijk even hier naar het verschil tussen gravel en fine_gravel
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:surface
Loekie1976 (2020-05-03 15:14:52+00:00): THNX, pas het aan naar fine gravel
eggie (2020-05-03 15:22:12+00:00): Top!  Dat is de reden dat ik mn gps instelling in Frankrijk nooit op onverhard vermijden zet.. Daar helaas veel surface =gravel tagging terwijl het eigenlijk fine_gravel is. Dat routeert als verhard.
Gr eggie
Loekie1976 (2020-05-03 15:30:49+00:00): Heb dit net met de racefiets gedaan, en deze gravel wegen waren prima te doen. Dus fine_gravel is hier wel van toepassing.
muzirian (2020-07-30 15:47:37+00:00): Don't add personal information like name of people to osm.
Supaplex (2020-05-03 16:36:38+00:00): I have a photo of the construction site plan map, the name is 文山森林公園新建工程. The park have not finished and still under construction.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84567625
mueschel (2020-05-03 16:41:20+00:00): I didn't change the 'construction' tag. It's still there and marks this area as an unfinished park. But the name of what is being constructed is "文山森林公園" and doesn't contain the words "新建工程". This is just a descriptive name that shouldn't appear in OSM - it's all said by the tags (which obviously are not visible on the site plan were they had to use a text to describe the object).

But, if you really mean that the proper name of what is being constructed here contains the words "construction site", feel free to revert my change.
marczoutendijk (2020-05-11 09:13:09+00:00): Please don't use the name tag to describe what something is.
Is "Natural Rock" really the name of that rock?
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
VIPINDAS K (2021-01-12 19:01:45+00:00): don't add line without tag..
user_2066394 (2020-05-03 16:06:52+00:00): getaggt nach wiki, vehicle=no ist an sich impliziert?
Michael_H (2020-05-03 17:56:45+00:00): Auf dem Schild steht aber "Anlieger frei", also ist vehicle=no nicht korrekt.
user_2066394 (2020-05-03 18:13:57+00:00): guter punkt :-) zeichen 260 war ja eingepflegt. gerne bei solchen änderungen immer changeset-kommentar dazu, damit man ne chance hat zu lernen
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:21:47+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2020-05-04 04:40:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Small hint: Building parts are not boundaries
Hungerburg (2020-05-03 22:13:08+00:00): Hey Joker, does you business tap the 220kV power line, or is this a mistake?
jmapb (2020-05-08 22:19:33+00:00): Hi tylerchill, I'm wondering about the revised geometry of the Delancy/Pitt Street intersection. What imagery are you using for these changes?
user_385682 (2020-05-09 12:13:33+00:00): That was a mistake. I was cleaning up the alignment (unnecessary nodes etc) and uploaded before I should have. I reintroduced the slip lane and straightened Pitt Street as experienced on the ground. Have a look.
eggie (2020-05-03 16:40:27+00:00): Dag C@s
Vaak zijn tweewielers uitgezonderd van oneway.
Dan bijtaggen
oneway:bicycle=no  en indien nodig oneway:moped=no

Is dat hier het geval?
MVG,
Eggie
c@s (2020-05-04 08:05:48+00:00): Hallo Eggie, ja dat is het geval. Om deze reden viel het mij ook op dat een deel van de postjeskade oneway niet klopt (ook niet voor auto's). Daarom heb ik de straat gesplitst en de gedeelten die niet eenrichting zijn het oneway attribuut weggehaald.
eggie (2020-05-04 09:04:16+00:00): Oke.. prima.. De uitzonderingen van tweewielers op oneway had ik inmiddels toegevoegd. Dat ontbreekt trouwens op veel meer plaatsen. Je moet maar eens kijken hoe ik dat heb gedaan.
MVG,
Eggie
c@s (2020-05-06 11:42:37+00:00): Ja, die uitzonderingen ontbreken vaak. Zie dat je dus gewoon attributen moet toevoegen zoals je beschrijft (optie kwam niet std naar boven met iD browser editor). 

Als me nog een keer wat opvalt bij plannen van tours (komoot of strava) pas ik het aan.
Overigens wel raar dat ik nog steeds de 1 richtingspijltjes zie in de kaart nu.
eggie (2020-05-06 12:27:24+00:00): Dag c@s  Dat komt omdat het eenrichting is :)
Met uitzondering van tweewielers. Op de fietskaartlayer zie je dan de pijltjes twee richting opgaan.
De openfietsmap heeft ook zo'n aanduiding.
De fietskaartlayer ligt nagenoeg stil in rendering. Dus die is niet maatgevend. 
MVG,
eggie
c@s (2020-05-06 12:43:28+00:00): Maar het bovenste stuk postjeskade is geen eenrichting, ook niet voor auto's. Dat heb ik willen aangeven, en het attribuut oneway:no staat er nu bij. Maar alsnog pijltjes bij mij. Ook na browser cache verwijderen.
Groet, JJ
eggie (2020-05-06 13:41:58+00:00): Vanaf de Postjesbrug tot aan de Corantijnstraat is geen eenrichtingsverkeer en ook geen pijltjes te zien in de standaardkaart van OSM.
Daar staat oneway=no op getagd. 
Vanaf nr 145 H naar het zuiden wordt het pas oneway=yes  met de uitzonderingen van tweewielers.
Het is dus correct getagd zoals je bedoeld hebt.
Welke kaart kijk je naar?
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-06 13:43:48+00:00): Het gaat dus over dit stuk https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.36267/4.85057
c@s (2020-05-06 13:48:28+00:00): Yes, nu staat het wel goede in beide stukken zie ik. Toch iets met caching/rendering denk ik. Ik kijk naar de kaart hiernaast, die ik zie als ik de changeset klik. Gewoon OSM geloof ik.
Tomas Straupis (2020-05-03 17:21:01+00:00): iD yra prastas redaktorius, skirtas tik labai paprastiems keitimams - pridėti suoliuką ar nurodyti kavinės darbo laiką. Bet kokiu atveju NIEKADA nereikia klausyti, ką iD siūlo keisti kaip „pasenusias žymas“. Atkeičiau atgal į anksčiau buvusias teisingas žymas.
AdventrrGrrl (2020-05-04 09:49:55+00:00): Nu labai jau griežtas ir netgi sakyčiau snobiškas nusistatymas tavo. Labai daug ir gana sudėtingų keitimų įmanoma padaryt su iD. Galbūt iD "nuomone" pasenusios žymos ir nėra pasenusios, bet iš kur man žinot? Ar man reikėtų tiesiog aklai klausyti ir tikėti ką kiekvienas OSM veteranas sako? 

By the way, kodėl vis išskiri tą šalia esančią industrial zoną iš quarry zonos? Ten tiesiog apleisti karjero pastatai, kurie buvo naudojami iškesenų laikymui, apdirbimui, ir t.t. Kiek žinau jie turėtų būti karjero zonoje.
Tomas Straupis (2020-05-04 10:23:37+00:00): Na visada reikia prisiderinti prie vietinių (šiuo atveju Lietuvos) žymėjimo susitarimų. Priešingu atveju bus bardakas. Yra pramoninė zona ir yra karjeras. Pagal topologijos taisykles jos negali persidengti. Jei labai norisi, kad pastatai būtų karjero zonoje, tai reikia atitinkamai keisti (mažinti) pramoninės zonos plotą.
Ir iD leidžia padaryti gan daug sudėtingų keitimų, deja beveik visi jie padaromi nekorektiškai ir tada kažkas turi eiti paskui ir taisyti :-)
eggie (2020-05-03 16:42:37+00:00): Hi...Any exceptions for bicycle for oneway=yes? 
Please tag oneway:bicycle=no
oneway:mope:no  for proper routing

Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2020-05-03 19:47:59+00:00): restricties tweewielers aangepast
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:22:16+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
BCNorwich (2020-05-05 08:00:06+00:00): Hi, I removed access=no tag from the footpath, there is public access to the footpath. Add bridge over the stream.
PhilAck (2020-05-05 19:43:02+00:00): Thanks, I got myself in a muddle with this one.
mariotomo (2021-09-15 20:35:40+00:00): pregunta sobre la "Hacienda Los Molinos". una empresa con este nombre está mencionada en el video youtu.be/LUddnUHYpzs, y pues es una empresa, "Hotel Boutique".  qué es lo que mapeaste?
TheBestIdea (2020-06-11 16:36:35+00:00): FYI, The bike approach to the Williamsburg bridge has recently been reconfigured and doesn't show up in much of the aerial imagery. This change severed all of the bike routes that intersect at Delancey and Clinton. I'm going to try and fix it, but this intersection should not be edited without recent local knowledge.
Tomas Straupis (2020-05-03 17:28:45+00:00): leisure=garden yra dekoratyviniai sodai, pritaikyti lankytojams
AdventrrGrrl (2020-05-04 09:52:55+00:00): Išskyrus tuos kurie yra garden=residential arba garden=private.
RicoElectrico (2020-05-03 19:46:48+00:00): Cześć, dziękuję za dodanie punktu do mapy. Zajrzałem na stronę internetową tego sklepu. To chyba bardziej delikatesy niż supermarket? Chcę zmienić na taką kategorię. Mam też drugie pytanie - czy jest to lokal sklepowy, który funkcjonuje także poza internetem?

Dzięki za odpowiedź!
bxl-forever (2020-05-05 22:36:51+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for editing the map.
When a shop is closed, it’s better to remove tags relating to their business activity.  Please do NOT delete the point itself.  This is useful, e.g. to analyze the history of a shop and see how it changed over time.
Thanks for this.
Protoxenus (2020-05-11 10:28:26+00:00): Hallo,
du hast in diesem Änderungssatz die K2 von Neuenkirchen nach Leist 2 angefasst. Kennst du dich in der Gegend aus? Ist das wirklich eine Kreisstraße, auf der nur landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge verkehren dürfen? Ist zumindest ungewöhnlich.

Gruß Protoxenus
Carto'Cité (2020-05-18 18:33:23+00:00): Salut,
Suite à mes messages sur les DSC en bande cyclable j'ai des doutes sur ces way également : 28887641, 34591762, 34620809, 39165310, 39726762, 39726764, 97690600
J'ai regardé la photo et je ne pense qu'il y ait de bande et que ce plutôt de simples opposite.
Merci d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
q_un_go (2020-05-03 20:35:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/q_un_go/traces/3294260

Da man mir ja sonst nicht glaubt, ich sei da gewesen.
Carto'Cité (2020-05-18 18:15:32+00:00): Re-bonjour,
Sur cette voie (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23041304) tu as préciser que le DSC était sur bande (opposite_LANE) mais je pense qu'il ne s’agit que d'une bande dite d'amorçage et que sur le reste de la route ce sont de symples picto. À moins que la photo aérienne ne soit plus d'actualité. Sinon l'ajout de oneway:bicycle=no est redondant avec le opposite et a tendance à créer des confusion et introduire des risques de mauvaise interprétation si certains tag sont ajoutés. Je me permets de le retirer mais on peut en discuter bien entendu. Je te laisse me dire pour la bande cyclable.
À bientôt et merci pour tes contributions sur les aménagements cyclables.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2020-05-18 18:26:03+00:00): Je suis allé un peu vite ; je crois que j'ai la même question pour d'autres way : 23041307, 23054948, 23054950, 28887765, 28887854, 34591760 et 39726835. Pour https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23041307 je n'arrive pas à dire si c'est la peinture des bande qqui est effacée ou si c'est bien seulement des portions qui sont en bande. Pour les autre je suis presque sûr qu'il n'y en pas sur la photo aérienne donc si tu as l'info comme quoi elles ont été ajoutées récemment.
Merci d'avance pour ton aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
nitrix (2020-05-18 19:23:24+00:00): Bonsoir,

un panneau indique que la rue est en sens unique sauf pour les vélos. Des pîctogrammes au sol indiquent régulièrement ce double sens pour les vélos. En conséquence, les attributs actuels de la rue ne correspondent plus à la réalité, cf cas S1 de la page <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84572421>.

De manière générale, toutes les rues des Lilas en sens interdit sont dans ce cas.
Carto'Cité (2020-05-18 19:27:48+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour ton retour. On serait donc sur du simple DSC à taguer avec cycleway=opposite voir dans l'idéal cycleway:left=opposite pour expliciter la latéralisation. Est-ce que tu veux que je les corrige j'ai la liste :D ?
Charles de Carto’Cité
Tomas Straupis (2020-05-03 17:27:02+00:00): O čia tikrai draudžiamas eismas?
Is traffic really restricted here?
Burgman (2020-05-03 20:40:29+00:00): Na, aš šiandien ten nuvažiavau ir negalėjau sekti maršruto, nes yra aklavietės ženklas.
Tomas Straupis (2020-05-04 06:00:21+00:00): Aklavietė reiškia, kad kažkur pravažiavimo nėra, o ne kad eismas uždraustas... Gal yra žinoma, kur pravažiavimo nėra, ar reikia nuvažiuoti ir pažiūrėti?
Burgman (2020-05-04 21:02:44+00:00): Aš nežinau, kur baigiasi praėjimas, net neįvažiavau. Aš buvau pakeliui iš Kairėnų kapinių į prekybos centrą NORDIC ir navigacijos sistema nuvedė mane į šią aklavietę.
„OpenStreetMap“ Wiki neradau, kaip šią gatvę pažymėti kaip aklavietę.
Tomas Straupis (2020-05-06 19:15:28+00:00): Nėra žymėjimo „aklavietė“, nes ir negali būti, aklavietė - tai „negalimumas pravažiuoti kiaurai“. Taigi reikia rasti, kurioje vietoje nėra pravažiavimo ir ten nukirpti kelius, pvz. važiuoti taip, kaip rodo navigatorius ir žiūrėti, kur nėra pravažiavimo. (yra taško žymėjimas noexit=yes, bet jis skirtas vietoms, kur kelias yra labai arti kito kelio, bet ten nėra pravažiavimo, t.y. toks žymėjimas labiau skirtas tinklo tikrinimo įrankiams, kad jie suprastų, kad pravažiavimo nebuvimas ne žymėjimo klaida)
bxl-forever (2020-05-03 23:17:53+00:00): Hello,
It’s nice that you are adding sidewalks, I do that myself too and it’s useful, especially to guide blind people with OSM data.
Two things here:
1) I don’t think it’s useful to make two separate ways for a crossing instead of a single one (e.g. ways 799418043 and 799418039) unless you have a real reason.  Make it a long one whenever you can, it will make database imports much lighter.
2) crossing=marked should not apply on ways.  It’s not your fault, it’s because you apparently use the simple online editor and it shows you a box named "Type".  Better leave it blank.  BTW, a nice thing to do for pedestrian crossings (as ways) is filling a surface tag, it’s easy to recognize with UrbIS imagery.
Thierry1030 (2020-05-04 08:08:18+00:00): hello, thanks for your message! 
for the moment I'm still using the online editor yes ... but I have a meeting pending with Jo Decock to get an introduction to JOSM ... :-)
concerning your comments:
1) I don't understand what you mean with "two separate ways for a crossing" ... or is it that a "crossing" only needs to be tagged as a "node" and not via a "line"?
2) so only "highway=footway" and "footway=crossing"?

Could you give me a good example I can rely on?
bxl-forever (2020-05-04 08:38:36+00:00): Tagging as a node AND a way is okay.
1) Easier to explain with a picture.
https://img.tedomum.net/data/scrot_202005041035.35-e8aa03.png
2) Yes.
Thierry1030 (2020-05-04 10:31:53+00:00): thx it's clear like that, I deleted the 2 separate ways and added 1 way with the tag "highway=footway" and "footway=crossing" ... can you do a last check?
last thing: I tag the pavement for blind people separately, is it OK like this? -> "highway=footway", "footway=sidewalk" and "tactile_paing=contrasted"
bxl-forever (2020-05-04 11:29:27+00:00): Yes, you do it right, now, very good!

I’m not a good specialist about tactile_paving.  Personally, I only use "yes", "no", or "incorrect" (many cases in Brussels with tiles on one side but not on the other).  But it’s a good idea to use "contrasted".  I’ve always thought it would be useful to get in touch with people who actually need that information and make sure we are filling the map with useful data for them.
LorenzoStucchi (2020-05-17 09:48:39+00:00): Ciao, ho visto che hai modificato i nomi delle strade. Attenzione che i nomi delle strade devono obbedire alle linee guida della comunità italiana riportate qui: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade

Ad esempio:
name=Via Primo Maggio
alt_name=Via I Maggio
short_name=Via 1 Maggio