piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-09-26 15:08:23+00:00): De toponym Westerzand heb ik hier hersteld en de de landuse=forest verwijderd.
Een toponym heeft (eigenlijk had) als functie om een naam te geven aan een gebied.
Het is niet bedoeld om landuse te laten renderen.
De rendering zal wel weer herstellen nu. 
MVG
eggie
Frans S (2022-09-30 12:33:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.

I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
* Pay more attention on accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126362011
LockOnGuy (2022-09-22 17:41:21+00:00): Hello, welcome to OSM and thank you for your edit.      
Can you please confirm if the locations are correct?      
Best Regards.
jonrellim (2022-09-19 16:12:23+00:00): Hoi,
Waarom verander je op zo veel plekken natural=shrubbery naar leisure=garden? Shrubbery is een juiste tag voor gemeentegroen die voornamelijk bestaan uit struiken. Leisure=garden is naar mijn mening wel iets heel anders. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=shrubbery 
Op dit moment is shrubbery nog niet zichtbaar in de carto renderer, maar de nederlandse community doet actief moeite om dit te regelen.
74523978 (2022-09-19 16:30:25+00:00): leisure=garden is prima voor gemeente tuintjes.
74523978 (2022-09-19 16:58:27+00:00): Maar hier gaat het om siertuinen. Kan public, municipal en street_side zijn. Het groen op het Koningsplein bestaat niet bepaald uit bosjes. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=garden%3Atype#values
Cartographer10 (2022-09-19 18:13:45+00:00): Het merendeel is gewoon shrubbery en zeker geen tuin. Kijk deze [1] maar eens. Dit past perfect binnen de shrubbery definitie, strak onderhouden struikgewas. Hier [2] zie je dat ook scrub (de voorganger van shrubbery) wordt aangebevolen  voor dergelijk groen. 

[1] https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=360328535531134&lat=52.218567806918&lng=6.9014674810783&z=17&focus=photo
[2] https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=71035
74523978 (2022-09-19 20:04:54+00:00): Ja ik zie bloemetjes en al maar als jij vindt dat het shrubbery moet zijn tag je het weer om. Geen probleem.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Vonter (2022-10-12 05:35:31+00:00): Hello!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed that you have been adding a lot of highways and roads in Bangalore, which is nice to see!

There are a couple of cases though where I've been seeing roads being tagged incorrectly, or roads which I know don't exist, based on ground experience, are getting added to the map. Like in this case, the roads which have been marked inside the park as Residential Roads, are unlikely to be so since the park is primarily meant to be used by pedestrians for walking. Please go through the Wiki for more details on how a particular road can best be tagged: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#Classification

I have also noticed that you're adding the #ola hashtag to every changeset. Is this mapping activity that you're involved with being organized by Ola? If yes, it would be good to go through the Organized Editing Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing

Also, general tips and good practices for mapping on OSM that can be helpful are available on these Wiki pages:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map

In case of any questions or if you are not sure how to proceed with certain types of mapping, please approach the OSM India community https://community.osm.be/resources/asia/india/
Olga_Kovalevskaya (2022-09-19 09:37:15+00:00): Changed street names to 'Cherokee Drive. Source - Highway Performance Monitoring System FSYS 3 and local user feedback. #mbx_usa_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126362701
Olga_Kovalevskaya (2022-09-19 09:37:41+00:00): Changed street names to 'Cherokee Drive. Source - Highway Performance Monitoring System FSYS 3 and local user feedback. #mbx_usa_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126362701
Olga_Kovalevskaya (2022-09-19 09:37:47+00:00): Changed street names to 'Cherokee Drive. Source - Highway Performance Monitoring System FSYS 3 and local user feedback. #mbx_usa_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126362701
aixbrick (2022-09-19 15:50:08+00:00): Hallo,
das Löschen von https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1544560645 (und dadurch auch Wegen) war vermutlich ein Versehen. Ich habe das rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126382798.
Gruß
GeoService Städteregion Aachen (2022-09-20 09:03:55+00:00): Ja entschuldige, es war ein Versehen.
Nach dem Wechsel der Ansicht von Aachen nach Herzogenrath sind drei Wege bis zu einem Knoten auf der Straße Rosfeld gezogen gewesen.
Da habe ich beim Trennen eines Weges nicht richtig aufgepasst und ausversehen denn Rest der dranhing mit gelöscht.

Danke fürs kümmern und Kontrollieren.
Firefishy (2022-09-19 12:13:50+00:00): Thank you! Local knowledge is awesome. Appreciate any other improvements. https://every-door.app/ is a great app for making improvements from cellphone.
eggie (2022-09-19 10:33:35+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Lijkt mij oke..
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Dparking_position

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Msiipola (2022-09-24 14:35:23+00:00): Ny serviceväg från Sundsbrogatan till byggnad söder därom, följer inte bakgrund. Dessutom ska inte service anslutas på byggand. Juster eller ta bort service
mcliquid (2022-09-25 17:48:12+00:00): Hi, ist die St 2056 hier wirklich ein Gehweg?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/155047756

Hast du dazu eine Quelle? Oder ist das ein grober Fehler?
Krustyyy (2022-09-25 18:26:57+00:00): Das stimmt. Ist inzwischen keine Staatsstraße mehr, da eine Umgehungsstraße gebaut wird.
mcliquid (2022-09-25 18:35:30+00:00): Wie lange wird die Umgehung gebaut? (start_date)
Krustyyy (2022-09-25 18:39:17+00:00): Seit März. Fertigstellungstermin ist mir nicht bekannt. Umgehungsstraße ist schon gestrichelt eingetragen. Der von mir geänderte Teil ist so jedoch schon korrekt.
Msiipola (2022-09-24 14:32:09+00:00): Ny service, format som ett L, följer inte bakgrundsbild. Ta bort eller gör om!
pio2_122 (2022-09-19 11:14:12+00:00): Proszę, nie zmieniaj dróg na ogrodach działkowych z highway=track na service.
Jest to przeważający standard tagowania w Polsce, zgodny z przeznaczeniem tego tagu:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2021-February/060028.html
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
osmviborg (2022-09-19 10:12:52+00:00): 'building=grandstand' er vist et bedre tag.
GregersP (2022-09-19 10:28:09+00:00): Sikkert :-)
Jeg kopierede blot det ekeisterende tag fra vest, så det var ens opmærket.
GregersP (2022-09-19 10:28:59+00:00): Og jeg har ingen præferencer, så det er helt fint at ændre det.
osmviborg (2022-09-19 11:14:55+00:00): 👌
Msiipola (2022-09-24 14:30:24+00:00): Servicevägen som ansluter till Gårdsjögatan som ett U, går över gräsmatta. Bakgrundsbilden verkar inte ha varit kalibrerad.
Msiipola (2022-09-24 14:27:19+00:00): Service-vägen som ansluter till Parkgatan är dåligt ritad och följer inte parkeringen bra.
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-05-28 14:31:32+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10036107265/history has addr:housename = 23 that was added in this edit
What this tag means? Numeric value is unexpected here - was it supposed to be addr:housenumber= ?
Ilya Zub (2022-09-22 07:59:06+00:00): Крим - це Україна. птн пнх!
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-02-06 12:48:49+00:00): Please don't vandalize the roads by changing them to paths.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
eggie (2022-09-19 10:43:51+00:00): Alle begin moeilijk..Zeker accesstagging. 

Het zou goed kunnen.. maar bicycle=yes op het vlak gaat niet helpen. Die tag hoort ook op de wegdelen

Geld delivery:conditional=delivery @ (07:00-12:00) wellicht ook op het gedeelte dat je hebt afgesloten voor verkeer?

MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2022-09-22 19:21:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a lock on http://www.osm.org/way/1095873390. what is the meaning of the tag 4=2?
Takuto (2022-09-25 19:39:45+00:00): Thanks for getting my attention to this typo, fixed it.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Allroads (2022-11-30 14:32:17+00:00): Goedendag,

Waarom hier oneway=yes?

mvrgr Allroads.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:02:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
cytryn (2022-09-20 22:03:08+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for the revision - you're definitely right that these slipways are not seamarks anymore. Nontheless, I think at least disused:leisure=slipway tag should stay there.
Although one of them is built over by the wharf and the second one is a temporary storage place for some concrete plates ;) these facilities are still clearly visible on the ground, so I'd rather leave them tagged as disused slipways.
Also just in case anyone would like to recreate them basing on the outdated imagery.
malcolmh (2022-09-21 03:01:16+00:00): Done
cytryn (2022-09-21 20:39:18+00:00): Thanks!
Jowet (2022-09-21 14:17:01+00:00): This shouldn't be tagged as a way
Jowet (2022-09-21 14:21:36+00:00): I mean: This way shouldn't be tagged as a footpath
malcolmh (2022-09-23 10:11:04+00:00): You can edit that!
quantenschaum (2023-09-22 05:55:14+00:00): What is this, a foot path over the water? I assume it is a ferry route. Does this actually exist? Pleas tag accordingly. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dferry
Frans S (2022-10-01 14:20:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and hardly squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building needs to be mapped as a single building.
Please pay attention to next points:
You often mapped a block of buildings as 1 single building

* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126364584
Mammi71 (2022-09-23 16:19:45+00:00): Hi, Im Sauerbrod hast Du am nördlichen Ende noch ein paar Stückchen tertiary übersehen ...
Mammi71 (2022-09-23 16:21:48+00:00): ... auch zwischendrin ...
Vinzenz Mai (2022-09-23 21:23:54+00:00): Stimmt: die Auf- und Abfahrt sowie den Minikreisel. Jetzt nicht mehr :-)
BCNorwich (2022-09-19 13:38:35+00:00): Hi, bicycles and horse are not designated to use a public footpath. The highway is a track for agricultural use designated as a PRoW. I've amended to suit.

Regards Bernard.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
BCNorwich (2022-09-19 13:41:47+00:00): Hi, This is a farm track not designated for cycle or horse use. I've amended to suit.

Regards Bernard,
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
martien-176 (2022-09-21 18:28:29+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. You requested a review.

The buildings you mapped are well done. Be careful though not to include surrounding courtyards.

As to the roads: be careful with your spelling, you tagged the roads as haghway. That should be highway.

Also your tagging highway=residential could imo be better tagged as highway=unclassified. Their main function (zoom out to see that better) is connecting settlements. 

I fixed the misspelling.

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126365554
Mammi71 (2022-09-23 16:31:27+00:00): primary_link halte ich für falsch:
- das ist keine "Auffahrt", an Kreuzungen sollte die Straße mit der niedrigeren Klassifikation bis an die Kreuzung herangeführt werden.
- reine Rechtsabbiegerspuren als _link sind ok, aber dann die Klassifikation nach Verkehrsbedeutung eher die niedrigere. Nur bei Autobahnen und  Kraftfahrtstraßen nimmt man die höhere Klassifikation aus verkehrsrechtlichen Gründen, bei anderen Straßen nur dann die höhere Klassifikation, wenn es echte Auffahrtsrampen auf Kreuzungsfreie Straßen sind.

Solltest Du noch die Tabelle aus dem Wiki kennen, die grundsätzlich immer die höhere Klassifikation empfohlen hat, die war schon immer umstritten und ist inzwischen wieder weg. Leider mappen seit dem das viele Kollegen in OSM so, aber kein einiger anderer Kartenanbieter macht das.
Vinzenz Mai (2022-09-23 21:18:41+00:00): Ja, ich denke, das war noch in meinem Hinterkopf. Ich habe jetzt auf unclassified geändert. Wie sieht es mit der Abfahrt aus? Primary_link lassen oder ebenfalls unclassified?
Mammi71 (2022-09-25 21:29:09+00:00): Die Rechtsabbiegerspur von der Westspange zur Grülingstr. würde ich auch wieder runterstufen auf tertiary_link, ebenso die Grülingstr. vom Ludwigkreisel ostwärts als tertiary.
Vinzenz Mai (2022-09-25 22:12:14+00:00): tertiary für die Grülingsstraße passt doch nicht, weil sie eben keine übergreifende Verbindungsfunktion mehr hat. Daraus folgt, dass auch die Abfahrt kein tertiary_link sein sollte. 

Wenn tertiary und tertiary_link, dann sollte das gleiche auch für die Auffahrt zum Ludwigskreisel (der im aktuellen Mapping nicht als Kreisel erkennbar ist) gelten. Und wenn ja, wieweit: bis zur Einmündung Sittersweg oder bis zum Kreisel an der Rodenhofbrücke?
Mammi71 (2022-09-26 11:01:25+00:00): Stimmt, mein Fehler. tertiary passt nicht, also alles unclasified. Sorry, da hatte ich mich vertan.
Und der Ludwigkreisel heißt zwar so, ist aber kein echter Kreisel, passt glaub so, wie er gemappt ist.
user_2066394 (2022-09-19 15:52:01+00:00): name=* ?
Luxenon (2022-09-19 19:18:20+00:00): name and address fixed
rivermont (2022-09-21 02:34:30+00:00): Is there a reason you use pole instead of tower on the high voltage lines?
zluuzki (2022-09-21 04:37:44+00:00): Uhmm ... high voltage "line supporters" are not automatically "towers"?
rivermont (2022-09-21 18:26:43+00:00): Well no but some of the large ones like n10036278900 seem like they would qualify for me
zluuzki (2022-09-21 18:41:26+00:00): Maybe. Differentiation is not always easy, I considered the majority of the masts small and therefore used pole. 
The first example image in the table at the power=pole wiki page is a pole, which is twice as high as the pole in question here. Although I would have tagged such a 'pole' as a tower anyway, I guess. But whatever.

If you think tower would fit better, I have no problem with changing it.
rivermont (2022-09-21 18:54:07+00:00): That works fine for me, was just wondering if there was a different criteria you were following
eggie (2022-09-19 15:46:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
feedback.. De info heb ik samengevoegd met de adresnode.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Msiipola (2022-09-24 14:21:39+00:00): Loggatans förlängning mot Norrtullgränd har nu både en cykelväg och serviceväg på samma ställe. Ta bort en av dessa.
bkil (2022-09-19 14:57:10+00:00): Üdvözlet a szerkesztők között! Lesz ma este egy online esemény amin örömmel megismerkednénk illetve segítenénk. Volna néhány átbeszélni való. Itt véletlenül sikerült átrakni a buszmegállót is focipályára. Ezt vissza tudnánk csinálni? https://osm.org/node/3439443522/history A focipályán pedig a sport=running elég, nem kell a ;public a végére - azt az access=* kifejezi https://osm.org/way/1095888372#map=19/46.96353/19.72962
bkil (2022-09-20 17:40:33+00:00): Továbbá szeretettel várunk a következő online találkozón https://wiki.osm.org/Hungary/20220923
Joe-w (2022-09-19 19:47:25+00:00): Hi Adrian, thanks for contributing to OSM! I have two suggestions for this changeset:
1. There isn’t a need to add a ‘name’ tag to these properties, since you’ve already correctly added the housenumber & street information under the appropriate tags! We try to avoid duplication where possible.
2. Having a look at other addresses in Long Ashton, it seems ‘addr:city’ should be ‘Bristol’, and ‘Long Ashton’ tagged with ‘addr:suburb’.
Thanks again :)
adrianktng (2022-09-19 21:37:55+00:00): Thanks for your comments. Adjusted.
literan (2022-09-21 17:19:07+00:00): добрый день. Обычно тротуары вдоль дворовых проездов не обрисовывают. Во дворах пешеходы и так имеют преимущество везде, им дозволяется ходить повсеместно.
abakus_uploader (2022-09-19 22:31:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
RicoElectrico (2022-09-19 12:04:42+00:00): Hi, it'd be good to specify on which weekdays is the bakery open: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9045662334/history

Probably it's closed on Sunday? But I don't know. If it is open the whole week, it'd be wise to write Mo-Su for the avoidance of doubt.
rskedgell (2024-08-16 09:44:01+00:00): Please don't add fictitious values for road surfaces - public highways in Greater London are extremely unlikely to be fine_gravel.
4004 (2022-09-25 21:52:13+00:00): а точно и 20 переименовали? в ЕГР без изменений, в новостях тоже не вижу
jcr83 (2022-09-19 16:11:34+00:00): Hi,
You added access=no on this road:https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931378128
Is is correct ? If true, even public services or  forestry people can't access this road.
richlv (2022-09-19 14:06:27+00:00): You committed this changeset 1.5 hours after I wanted to map the place - well done :D
HellMap (2022-09-19 14:24:17+00:00): :) Gotta be fast with you around or there will nothing new left to map.

There are still a lot of minor details to map here though. Notably, all the grass dividers/medians/separators. But without aerial, they are a real pain. The only saving grace is that the building has an accurate cadaster outline, so it's at least possible to align features to it from footage.
richlv (2022-09-21 10:49:23+00:00): Harrr - well, I did add a bicycle parking stand and surface for all the serviceways ;)
More micromapping possible almost always (surveillance cameras? lamp posts?), but from the dedicated survey point of view, I'd say this is good enough.
HellMap (2022-09-21 11:14:36+00:00): Personally, I think "normal" mapping should end at pedestrian amenity and accessibility routing. So sidewalks, kerbs, surfaces, trash cans, benches, crossing details, fences, gates, etc. Basically, can someone in a wheelchair reliably and safely navigate/route through?

Then micromapping starts with lamp posts and manholes. :)
RicoElectrico (2022-09-19 14:07:49+00:00): Dziękuję za poprawę!
mcliquid (2022-09-19 12:16:06+00:00): Check https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/666997044
I doubt that the number is the operator.
And the number is the ref rather than the name. The name is always at the top of the sign.
mcliquid (2022-09-19 12:17:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/666997283
For some, you filled in name and ref the same way. I would leave the name tag empty here if there is no name and use the number only for the ref.
novaridr (2022-09-19 12:21:20+00:00): Yeah i filled the number into the wrong field...
To the number as name: Some of the signposts in our area do not have a name, but the ref. no. is on top of the signpost so I thought it would be appropiate to use it as name.
mcliquid (2022-09-19 12:28:28+00:00): No problem. I would suggest to use only the ref-field instead of the name. The ref ist rendered anyway on the map when there is no name.
novaridr (2022-09-19 13:50:49+00:00): Ok, i will change it! Thanks for the input.
rhtb0 (2022-10-24 06:38:43+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
안녕하십니까
의미 있는 변경 집합 댓글(".")을 사용하십시오. 다른 사용자가 당신이 하는 일을 이해하는 데 도움이 되지 않습니다.
tolioalessandro (2023-11-10 11:17:36+00:00): Ciao,
una corsia ciclabile non è fisicamente separata dalla strada, pertanto non va disegnato un segmento a sè stante ma va semplicemente aggiunto il tag cycleway:both=lane o cycleway:right=lane al segmento esistente della strada.
Grazie del tempo che dedichi al miglioramento delle mappe di OpenStreetMap.
A presto,

Alessandro
DD1GJ (2022-09-20 06:13:09+00:00): In such cases, please delete only the tags for the hotel and not the entire building in future. I have restored and adjusted it.
Patr1k_P (2022-09-20 12:23:39+00:00): tu je dovod preco preco sa to odstranilo

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3151750