piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Marwis00 (2022-02-09 14:46:58+00:00): Spójrz na długość izolatorów -za krótkie na 30kV. Szerokie poprzeczniki wynikają tu z tego że przęsła są długie - nawet po 200m.
W budynku stacji jest rozdzielnica dwusystemowa 15kV z wyjściami na obie strony. Rozdzielnica 30kV jest w drugim budynku.
tomzyl (2022-02-09 15:17:51+00:00): Podmieniłem
Marwis00 (2022-02-09 15:20:37+00:00): No i gitara
Trevor_1 (2022-01-23 15:30:41+00:00): Hi, I hope you're doing well. Taos, NM is actually not big enough to be a city, because it only has about 6000 people, so I'm goint to have to change it to "town". Here on OSM, the "city" tag is actually used only for the largest cities. Durango even might be too small too, but I'll leave that one as it is for now.
they (2022-01-23 17:08:41+00:00): Taos is the center of a micropolitan statistical area of about 32,000 people.  6,000 is only the population of the city limits.  Since the drive to Santa Fe is 2 hours, it is definitely not a suburb.  Instead, it is a hub for a large portion of Northern New Mexico.  Its cultural significance and proximity to skiing also attract visitors from all over the world.

For these reasons, it was identified as a regional center in the New Mexico Highway Classification Guidance (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/New_Mexico/Highway_Classification).  The guidance calls Taos a city (which I think is generally synonymous with regional center).  Since the guidance has been up for some time, and no one from New Mexico seemed opposed to this, I went ahead and changed Taos to city on the map.
Trevor_1 (2022-01-23 17:17:52+00:00): Oh ok sorry, you can change it back. The reason why I changed it was because it showed up as an error here. But I guess it doesn't matter that much. 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=places&lon=-105.51700&lat=36.33803&zoom=9&overlays=megacities,largecities,cities,towns,villages,errors_unknown_place_type,errors_population_format,errors_place_without_name,errors_pop_type_mismatch,population
Trevor_1 (2022-01-23 17:18:59+00:00): I'll change it back. Sorry about that.
kapazao (2022-01-19 18:49:51+00:00): Hi, could you give any information about this proposed line?
You should add it to the changeset or a relation so other users can check it.
Regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116228814
Emanuele Lorenzo Corti (2022-01-20 08:46:05+00:00): Hi, I’m sorry about this lack of information: I’m not very good at relations yet. I’ll do what I can to correct it, thank you for the warning.
VictorIE (2022-05-21 17:37:43+00:00): Hi,

Some corrupt addr:street here, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021765592#map=19/53.31744/-6.27907
literan (2022-01-18 20:51:01+00:00): пофиксил тут все
Mammi71 (2023-06-15 15:33:55+00:00): Hallo sola29,

Du hast hier vor einem Jahr die Bahnübergänge von disused=yes zu disused:railway=level_crossing geändert. Vor Ort warst Du aber nicht, oder? Es gibt hier nämlich Bahnübergänge mit Andreaskreuz, Lichtsignal und Halbsschranken.
eggie (2023-06-08 17:52:29+00:00): 
Dag Otto,
Op de Gerrit Rietveldsingel heb ik parking_space aangepast met een vlak amenity=parking enz. zoals ik denk dat het hoort.
MVG
eggie
OttoR (2023-06-10 12:09:05+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Ik vind dit voor street-side parkeren eerlijk gezegd een beetje overdreven. Je krijgt dan overal van die "P" op de kaart; suggererend dat het een parkeerterein is. 

Neem als vorobeeld nu het Karel Appelhof. Daar staat nu 3 keer een P; terwijl het eigenlijk gewoon parkeervakken langs de weg zijn.

Om die reden doe ik het dus niet; maar alleen daar waar het echt een parkeerterein betreft.

Om dezelfde reden dat ik ook niet bij elk vakje "capacity=1" neerzet.
eggie (2023-06-10 12:53:46+00:00): Oke Otto....  maar de wiki zegt dat parking_space een onderdeel is van een amenity parking.
Wanneer je dan street_side krijg je juist een kleine P ipv zo'n grote.
Het is vorig jaar juist aangepast om dat bezwaar te ondervangen. Ook startende mapper mappan overal parkeerterreinen terwijl het gewoon parkeermogelijkheden zijn.
Bij uitzoomen valt de P direct weg.
Zie hier de wiki..
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

We voegen dus nu die parkeervakken gewoon toe als street_side. 
Op het vlak kun je de capaciteit toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
OttoR (2023-06-10 20:14:51+00:00): ok, helder; was niet bekend met die update.

Zal het gaan toepassen, going forward.  Ben nu ergens anders bezig :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
DaveF (2022-01-18 17:10:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9423780362
RicoElectrico (2022-01-17 09:53:04+00:00): Dzięki za dodanie AED! Jeśli chcesz, to możesz przejechać tę listę, weryfikując ją w terenie lub jeśli znajdziesz gdzieś w internecie zdjęcia pozwalające dokładnie umiejscowić lokalizację: https://www.gdansk.pl/wiadomosci/32-kolejne-defibrylatory-w-gdansku-pomoga-ratowac-zycie-lista,a,124058
user_5359 (2022-01-19 10:05:12+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tags
source:city_county_code = 42720
source:city_county_name = 홍천군
source:date = 2021-05
source:province = 강원도
source:published_date = 20121221
source:serial = 4272000014
(eample of http://www.osm.org/relation/13682365)

This is further information about the postal code and not information where this information comes from (see meaning of the prefix.
izolight (2022-01-19 22:37:32+00:00): The tags source:city_county_code, source:city_county_name, source:province have been removed as they can be infered from the spatial data (similar to is_in: keys).
I renamed the source:serial tag to postal_code:serial.
eggie (2022-01-17 07:40:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback:  Scherp gezien..

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
awjvdh (2022-01-17 11:23:11+00:00): Merci! :-)
SomeoneElse (2022-01-16 22:53:09+00:00): There were 3 breakages in EV12, and at the same place also breakages in NCN1 and Yorkshire Wolds Cycle Route.  I changed WoR to not go round 2 sides of a triangle.
Marwis00 (2022-02-07 10:27:12+00:00): Dlaczego wszystkie gazociągi wychodzące z tłoczni Gustorzyna dostały nazwę Odolonów-Gustorzyn?
charl3s (2022-02-07 10:36:26+00:00): gdzieś błąd popełniłem, poprawię
kuhni74 (2022-03-18 14:57:40+00:00): Da war schon ein "artwork", ich hab mir erlaubt, die beiden Objekte zu fusionieren als "memorial" ("monument" wäre was Riesiges, Begehbares etc., so wie z.B. die Freiheitsstatue in New York)
kartonage (2022-01-17 08:21:53+00:00): Hej,

for your information: you probably accidentally removed the island "Grand Îlet". I have restored it and reverted the changes to all relations.
Please be more careful in the future. Thanks!

Best regards
BCNorwich (2022-01-17 08:36:05+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I am wondering what the meaning is of your two nodes tagged with names only of "Beccles Tri Club training" and "WVAC Training". You may not be aware that a name only is of no use if OSM doesn't know what it is a name of. Further features added to OSM must be on the ground features and verifiable to everyone else. Please see:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability

If these are personal features they should not be added to OSM. However, you may be in the process of adding something like a route. If so if you could explain your intention maybe I could help.

Regards Bernard.
Dave Catchpole (2022-01-17 08:58:51+00:00): HI Bernard, thanks for asking, intention is to mark a point of interest for STrava to use as 'Start Points' on their route planner.
I was trying to follow the guide from here: https://support.strava.com/hc/en-us/articles/216917827-Help-Improve-Strava-s-Maps
BCNorwich (2022-01-18 18:38:07+00:00): Hi, I can understand what you are trying to do but as I said above features added to OSM must be on the ground features and verifiable to everyone. I don't think there is any on the ground feature at these two points that can be added to the OSM database. Thus the tags ought be removed. 

I don't use Strava but from reading this page:- https://support.strava.com/hc/en-us/articles/216918387-Routes-on-Web 
I think they are saying that personal routes and waypoints can be compiled and saved on the Strava app. They do say you can improve and/or add data to OSM, but unfortunately, they omit to state that all new data must comply with OSM practices. Sorry but your data isn't verifiable.

If you're OK with this explanation I can easily remove the POIs and if I can help further please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Jakka (2022-01-17 08:31:45+00:00): éviter double tagging ici nom. Nom de l'activité intérieur est déjà repris sur node. Info activité est préférable sur node, info structure sur forme bâtiment
stevea (2022-01-17 12:16:16+00:00): Nice work!
literan (2022-01-18 20:43:19+00:00): мать моя, сколько же их. это какая-то сыпь
Steve_32 (2022-01-18 21:17:47+00:00): А их всё строят и строят )
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-03 12:14:40+00:00): é, vejo que você saiu movendo muita coisa nesta cidade pra ficar alinhado com o BIng, o que ficou errado, você deveria ter checado o alinhamento da camada BIng com gravação de GPS antes de ter feito isso. Deu muito trabalho pra você e agora vai dar muito trabalho para quem for realinhar corretamente.
jmapb (2022-01-17 15:30:45+00:00): Hello! What's the thinking behind moving POIs from the building ways into their own nodes?

Thanks, J
maxerickson (2022-01-17 21:19:21+00:00): In this case it was from a multipolygon relation with amenity+shop tags over both building ways (with building tags on the ways) to two nodes, one for the amenity and one for the shop.

I think the nodes, which are essentially an abstract statement "the thing is here" are a better representation of the situation because they are less specific than the relation. The convenience store building is not part of the OSM amenity, just closely associated with it. And then the other way around for the fuel. The multipolygon is too strong a specification for the modeled features.

I've been changing some stations form way to node in the area also, though I believe in most of those cases the tags on the way were very outdated (so some vague justification based on practice changing since the oldish previous edits and the node making the shop/amenity more visible in editors).

I'm aware that it isn't well settled modeling and am fine adjusting the tagging of the existing modeling if you'd prefer.
watmildon (2023-02-03 05:12:08+00:00): The post office had this in the gnis_id tag: "1668305News Highlights -  Canucks vs Red Wings (Dec.20,1978)....Kings vs Canucks (Dec.23,1978)....Sabres vs Canucks (Dec.28,1978)" I have cleaned it up but I thought you might find it amusing.
mdroads (2026-01-22 06:54:21+00:00): Thanks for cleaning that up.  Not sure how that string got into my clipboard while editing.  I must have been watching some old time hockey.
watmildon (2026-01-22 07:58:05+00:00): It's always fun to find these. Easy to clean up. Thanks for reminding me of it again. I always get a chuckle out of it.

Happy mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
eggie (2022-01-17 07:42:28+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
archpdx (2022-01-17 06:53:21+00:00): Hi,
Please note in the future that we don't abbreviate street names in OpenStreetMap. You can read more about why here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
felipeeugenio (2022-01-18 01:12:57+00:00): Ariel. gracias por tu tiempo. Pero la ciclovía ya estaba dibujada como parte de la calle Marathon. Lo que hiciste tu fue duplicarla.
La voy a borrar. saludos
Wilmer Osario (2022-01-17 10:30:54+00:00): Muchas gracias por contribuir. Esos datos son muy valiosos para nuestro mapa 👍🏼
SRD GIS (2022-01-17 19:47:56+00:00): Thanks for the trail merge Matt
👍
daganzdaanda (2022-01-27 11:01:49+00:00): Hi Hayden, 
why did you remove all the tags again? Now it's just an empty way. Or has the community not yet decided how to tag such "neighborhoods"?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116233913
daganzdaanda (2022-01-27 11:15:00+00:00): OK, sorry, I see you moved the tagging from the way to a relation. All's well ;-)
5m4u9 (2022-01-17 20:34:36+00:00): Hola, antes de comenzar a editar con el editor ID por favor, ocultar los boundaries/límites dado que a veces interfiere las ediciones.
5m4u9 (2022-01-17 20:38:45+00:00): Para ocultar los boundaries/límites en el editor iD presionar tecla U -> map features y desclicar "boundaries/límites"
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-02-04 05:05:29+00:00): موقع OSM ليس مكانا للدعايات نرجوا منكم احترام أن هذه الخريطة يستفيد منها عامة الناس
5m4u9 (2022-01-17 20:40:34+00:00): Hola, ésa sección de la Pinilla es túnel? me parece que es el acceso al túnel con techo. Seguro que le pusieron de nombre túnel pero solo en el nombre...
archpdx (2022-01-23 08:45:54+00:00): Hi Maggie,
Somethings gone wrong here: it looks like you renamed 54th to "Foot path" and converted a segment of Pendleton Creek to a foot path.

If you're having trouble fixing these issues don't hesitate to let me know how you intended this to be mapped: does Kenan connect 53rd and 54th and where should this foot path be placed in relation to Kenan? I appreciate the good intention of your edits but in the future please make sure to look at warnings before uploading.
julcnx (2022-01-17 04:23:26+00:00): Please kindly split your changes into smaller geographical changesets. Thank you! For more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116234687
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-01 16:17:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
user_5359 (2022-01-18 18:42:03+00:00): Hello! Which langugae code did you mean with name:halq’eméylem?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
user_5359 (2022-01-18 17:44:34+00:00): Hello! You add a tag ad=2611. Did you mean addr:housenumber=2611?
susmikan (2022-01-19 11:26:40+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing the feedback. 
Apologies for the incorrect address tags added, I have made the necessary corrections in the changeset #116337539. Going ahead I'll ensure not to repeat such errors.
I really appreciate the feedback provided. Thanks once again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you!

Regards,
susmikan
mueschel (2022-01-19 18:18:36+00:00): Hi,
Could you check this area, it got a strange 'dso' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021822184
TobyOrr (2022-03-18 01:26:42+00:00): Thanks for your feedback.

I have just become aware that, for quite a few months, my email account has been sending emails from OpenStreetMap directly to spam because of a large number of dubious ladies seeking my friendship via the OpenStreetMap message system.

I want to reassure you and the other people who messaged me or left changeset comments that I was not deliberately ignoring messages - I was just unaware that they were being trashed as spam. I have now changed account settings regarding mail from OpenStreeMap.
Allison P (2022-01-17 08:33:28+00:00): Don't forget to remove the construction tag!
h551w (2022-01-17 22:45:38+00:00): Ah! Thanks for the reminder, I guess iD doesn't get rid of that when you select "residential road" then
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-01 16:17:21+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Lee Carré (2022-01-17 04:33:54+00:00): See also http://www.osm.org/changeset/115753486
Lee Carré (2022-01-17 04:35:46+00:00): These might now be disused, but probably need to check with Jersey Water.
Lee Carré (2022-01-17 04:43:04+00:00): See also http://www.osm.org/note/3013803
Supaplex (2022-01-17 07:20:22+00:00): Please kindly split your changes into smaller geographical changesets. It seems to span across two countries Thank you! For more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changes
mueschel (2022-01-19 18:11:47+00:00): Hi,
please don't use tags like 
name:halq’eméylem
name:halq’eméylem
"name:halq’méylem "
name:halq’méylem 

Languages in name tags use iso 639 codes, i.e. name:hur
gpserror (2022-03-21 02:22:49+00:00): Hi, Thank you for adding what you see on the road to OSM.  I did have a comment: I noticed you added a few turn restrictions and currently they're being flagged with errors and will be ignored by driving routers.  Turn restrictions are relations that should contain three members: a from, a via, and to.  These tell what should be restricted or enforced for people on the from street, that go through the via, and head to the to street.  May need to revisit these turn restrictions and add the appropriate members.  Let me know if this doesn't make sense.  Thanks!
GITNE (2023-02-06 13:20:42+00:00): Also, regarding turn restrictions. I have seen that you have tried to add [relation 13683544](https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13683544/history) as a `no_u_turn` restriction at the Meadow Ponds gated community in order to prevent your app from routing a u-turn in a gated community. This goes back to mapping the situation on the ground, not what kind of behavior we want in any particular app. So, instead what you should have done was to map the ways in the gated community as `access=private` because this is the situation on the ground, not a u-turn restriction. Again, independent of the behavior of the app.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-01 16:17:03+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (259)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Lee Carré (2022-03-03 22:24:41+00:00): Also tag as http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=marker ?
Warin61 (2022-01-17 22:31:55+00:00): I think your trying to 'colour in the map'. 

The relation 13584519 - grass - has an error. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.70418&lat=-32.98403&zoom=16
AndrewS (2022-01-17 23:56:30+00:00): I didn't realise that was a thing. Is that bad? Certainly guilty of obsessing too much over detail and need to set myself a limit. The infinite zoomability of OSM doesn't help. 
Error fixed. Thanks.
Warin61 (2022-01-18 07:18:27+00:00): :) It is. Unfortunately frequently done by people who have never been there.. some times not even visited the country. 
I'd hope your local. Don't be afraid of leaving gaps.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-05 05:52:56+00:00): Please don't add descriptor labels in `name=`.
skorasaurus (2022-01-17 20:52:47+00:00): thanks for adding!
mavl (2022-01-18 15:04:24+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удалил здание с полным адресом и на его место добавил новое здание с неполным адресом (программы сейчас не смогут найти это здание по его адресу). Пожалуйста, не удаляйте правильные данные.
km2bp (2022-02-06 21:43:32+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9424483536  To jest błąd. Nie mapuj ślepo na podstawie rzeźby terenu z geoportalu. Dokonałem wizji lokalnej i tam jest tylko dół w ziemi bez najmniejszego śladu gruzu który mógłby sugerować pozostałość po obiekcie. Przetocznica  tuż za wieżą przeciwpożarową tam nie ma żadnego  bunkra
archpdx (2022-01-17 07:24:53+00:00): Hi,
It looks like you added a parking lot on the side of a cycleway - is this section accessible to cars? If it is you should probably extend the service road up to where cars are allowed.
dieterdreist (2022-09-03 13:01:10+00:00): Ciao Michele, ho visto che hai inserito start date 1999 per il ristorante Secchio e Olivaro 2 a Garbatella, ma il posto è stato creato molto dopo, nel 1999 non c’erano lì, c’era un’altro ristorante “L’Incontro”.
Marcussacapuces91 (2022-02-18 03:57:37+00:00): Pourquoi mettre un numérique sur un name qui d'ailleurs est déjà présent dans la référence et qui représente un numéro d'ordre et non le nom de l'endroit ?
Supaplex (2022-01-19 09:15:57+00:00): 建設中鐵道的標籤組合可以用 railway=construction, construction=rail，來與營運中的鐵路線區別
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116239607
CC_Simon (2022-01-23 06:01:07+00:00): 好的，謝謝提醒！；）
ivanbranco (2022-02-12 23:17:33+00:00): Hi Abhijth,

this place value is invalid, maybe you wanted to tag addr:place instead of place? Can you check it out?
2maxic (2022-01-22 06:15:32+00:00): Без понимания ключевых правил не рекомендую изменять ключ highway
О связности дорожного графа
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Additional_rules_to_highway_classification
luschi (2023-01-29 22:51:41+00:00): Hi taketaketake,

some year ago I fixed all bridges from bridge_name to bridge:name in Japan after contacting japanese OSM mailing list.     
Here you have addet the bridge_name at a bridge with alredy mapped bridge:name.     
This is not correct.

Please dont use bridge_name or tunnel_name in your futur edits.

regards       
luschi
Cheng-Chi Feng (2022-01-17 07:26:07+00:00): 打錯描述，應為「修正姑姑山東峰、姑姑山東北峰」