piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Uwejens (2016-06-27 18:08:49+00:00): Hallo Sven,
Vielen Dank fuer deinen Hinweis. Du hast recht damit. Ich wusste es bis
 dato
nicht besser,aber in Zukunft werde ich es so machen.
Es sieht auf der Karte auch besser aus. Ich werde es auch aendern.
Gruss Jens.
streckenkundler (2016-06-27 19:13:32+00:00): Hallo Jens... 

gern geschehen... Ich hatte mich auch erst an die Sache  mit den Fischpässen herangetastet... und gebe meine Erfahrungen gerne weiter.  Es gibt ja noch einige mehr.

Das Thema mit diesen Sohlgleiten der Spree im Cottbusser Bereich hatte ich heute durch Zufall auch mit einem Kollegen. Letztendlich bestehen die Dinger in dem Bereich einerseits aus einer überdimensionierten Fischpassage und seitlich angelegt, einem Kanupass... So richtig ist das vom Tagging noch nicht gut, das liegt aber vor allem auch daran, daß noch entsprechende Taggingmöglichkeiten fehlen... 

Gruß, Sven
kartler175 (2016-06-29 21:00:40+00:00): Bitte informiere dich über die geometrisch korrekte Kartierung von Flächen:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.20924&lat=51.13072&zoom=17&opacity=1.00&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.23292&lat=51.12703&zoom=18&opacity=1.00&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points
Galbinus (2016-06-30 17:05:33+00:00): korrigiert
trigpoint (2016-06-28 08:54:39+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. I am sure your business isn't in the middle of the road. Please remove and add in its correct position providing it is signed and therefore verifable.
Please drop the spam comments and description, OSM is a map not a business directory or a place to get free advertising.
trigpoint (2016-06-28 09:01:53+00:00): Reverted, same address as garden service so clearly an attempt at gaining free advertising
mavl (2019-01-04 16:58:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Loybilu (2016-06-27 09:16:15+00:00): Plus d'infos sur les travaux en cours sur http://www.remontees-mecaniques.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=24867 à suivre ...
literan (2016-06-27 14:23:16+00:00): Вот здесь не перепутал: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19125286 ? 2-я Брестская же односторонняя вдоль вокзала, откуда там повороты? И следующий отрезок у тебя почему-то с 2 полосами https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427579303 , а потом резко снова 4 полосы
literan (2016-06-27 14:23:32+00:00): не вдоль вокзала, а от вокзала, сорри
Felis Pimeja (2016-06-27 14:32:29+00:00): Первое принято. Сейчас поправлю. Когда разбивал отрезок от Грузинского вала до Большой Грузинской, забыл убрать направления. Получился дубль вот этого участка:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427579302

Там действительно 2 полосы по середине судя по разметке. По бокам расчертили парковочные карманы, поэтому минус 2 полосы:
http://atlas.mos.ru/?lang=ru&z=10&ll=37.58430329858472%2C55.77457120713664&pa=-37.8&pp=37.58430632%2C55.77457218
BCNorwich (2016-06-27 13:01:30+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap. You've somehow removed all tags from two foot-ways and two garden areas. Let me know if you need help fixing it.
Ben Harris (2016-07-04 23:51:42+00:00): I've reinstated the tags, and added access=private which would seem to capture the intent behind these changes, and the situation on the ground.
BCNorwich (2016-06-27 13:07:28+00:00): Hi, this parking area looks like it is not restricted to residents only. It looks like it is part of the highway, if so then the access=private tag should be removed.
Ben Harris (2016-07-12 21:05:48+00:00): I visited Shire Hall today to check the County Council's records, and they believe that the entire parking bay, including the footway behind it, is part of the highway.
BCNorwich (2016-07-13 06:19:21+00:00): Exactly my thinking.
Also I could see nothing to prevent or restrict public use on foot of the two footways (Way: 198204474 & Way: 198204473).
Ben Harris (2016-07-13 20:15:31+00:00): There's a sign next to each entrance to those paths saying "Private Grounds".  I've added source tags to indicate this.
BCNorwich (2016-07-14 05:46:45+00:00): OK, being remote I couldn't see that. 
Just needs the access=private to be removed from the parking bay.
SCRS (2016-07-14 09:26:23+00:00): The title deeds for Sherlock Close show the property boundary bisecting the lay-by. It was not resurfaced by the county council when Sherlock Close was. This lead the residents to believe it is private. Further check will be made.
user_5359 (2016-06-27 11:45:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your node please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0/Examples .
ReScQ (2016-06-27 12:29:09+00:00): Nach Maps4BW heißt das Gewässer Tiefenbach, woher stammt die Bezeichnung Saubach?
TheDudesHome (2016-06-27 18:39:31+00:00): Aus dem amtlichen Liegenschaftkataster. Vom Tiefenbachtal kommend heißt der Bach Tiefenbach, mit der Verdohlung Im Inneren Bogen wechselt der Name zu Saubach.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:58:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
wambacher (2016-06-28 08:32:37+00:00): was soll der Mist? mal so eben aus einer Stadt eine andere und dann noch fehlerhaft zu machen, grenzt an Vandalismus.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:58:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:58:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:58:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
R0bst3r (2016-06-28 06:56:46+00:00): Reverted this edit,it added just invalid data.
Tomas Straupis (2016-06-27 11:05:47+00:00): Pašalinta, nes šitas adresas jau buvo pažymėtas.
aceman444 (2016-07-03 18:19:28+00:00): Hi, please do not put advertisements into tags :) Also, the escape room was already mapped (as leisure=escape_game). We intentionally do not add tourism=attraction to it, as it is not important enough for general public. So I'll merge your additional info into the existing node. Thanks
mavl (2019-01-04 16:58:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Tomas Straupis (2016-06-27 11:06:29+00:00): Pašalinta, nes adresas jau buvo pažymėtas.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:58:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:58:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:59:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
letihu (2017-07-13 09:44:48+00:00): Wenn hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427588056/history
die Routen eingetragen werden, was ist dann mit der alten Stecke
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427589064/history
die schon existierte?
Nzara (2017-07-14 06:11:51+00:00): Ich würde ja gerne was dazu sagen, Aber irgendwie verstehe ich die Frage nicht.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:59:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
trigpoint (2016-06-28 09:00:29+00:00): Reverted as this is spam
corfede (2016-06-27 15:52:54+00:00): Si tratta di un defibrillatore o di un centro raccolta e riciclaggio (amenity=recycling)?
SomeoneElse (2016-06-29 17:51:04+00:00): Hello ChrissW-R1,
You've been warned many times before about mechanical edits, including:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36578320
This edit is clearly mechanical, since it is a test node that another user has added in the middle of the Sahara desert. Please ensure that any future edits from you follow http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .
Failure to do this will mean that you may be blocked from editing OpenStreetMap in the future.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
mavl (2016-06-27 18:15:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Улица названа «Весенная улица». Это правильное название? Или должно быть «Весенняя»?
Anton Shevtsov (2016-06-27 18:24:31+00:00): Да. Конечно же Весенняя. Завтра поправлю.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:59:10+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Reclus (2016-06-27 12:43:07+00:00): Danke!
ChrissW-R1 (2016-06-28 11:49:51+00:00): Bitte!
zstadler (2016-07-12 17:24:16+00:00): Who is the owner of this marks?
ITC, KKL, Haifa Wadies, or unknown?
WadisTrail (2016-07-13 10:48:02+00:00): סימון שביל ואדי ורדיה נעשה ע"י מתנדבי עמותת ירוק בלב, אך למיטב ידיעתנו עיריית חיפה אחראית באופן בלעדי לכל תחום השיפוט שלה
zstadler (2016-07-14 06:13:55+00:00): בהוספת שביל מסומן יש להוסיף גם 
relation
 עם הפרטים שלו, כמו שקיים לשביל הואדיות
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3734116

כאן צריך
network=lwn
כי זהו שביל מקומי. בשני המקרים יוצר השביל הוא
operator=yarokbalev

למיטב ידיעתי הרשויות המקומיות לא מפקחות, מאשרות או אחראיות לסימון שבילים שיוצרים גופים אחרים.
zstadler (2016-07-19 17:45:03+00:00): I've created the required relation in changeset 40874697
mavl (2019-01-04 16:59:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2016-06-27 17:40:02+00:00): Здравствуйте. Улицы добавлены неаккуратно. Много ошибок топологии. Например, на месте пересечения улиц нет общих точек. Одни улицы не соединены с другими улицами. Некторые улицы соединены с полигонами landuse. С такими ошибками навигация не будет работать.
mavl (2016-06-27 18:18:04+00:00): Этот магазин [http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427597981/history] расположен в здании. Поэтому нужен тег здания buiding.
Anton Shevtsov (2016-06-27 18:25:52+00:00): Спасибо за разъяснения. Первый блин, как говорится. Завтра все учту и поправлю.
mavl (2016-06-27 18:30:34+00:00): Все ошибки из этого и других недавних пакетов правок уже исправлены. Кроме «Весенней улицы».
mavl (2016-06-27 18:33:41+00:00): Для любых вопросов у нас есть форум [http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=21]. И система личных сообщений на сайте.
mavl (2016-06-27 17:21:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за добавление данных в OpenStreetMap.  
  
"Ушакова, 3я очередь застройки" это не имя (тег name), а описание (тег description).  
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Названия]
Johnny Carlsen (2019-09-09 07:36:15+00:00): Please don't replace names in local language to English spelled versions.
luiswoo (2016-06-27 21:14:06+00:00): Рекомендую использовать космоснимки Mapbox а не Bing (в настройке слоёв). Они новее и у них меньше проблем со смещением. Нормально работать со смещением снимков можно только в JOSM.
Да, тем, чем отмечена игровая площадка д\с отмечается вся территория д\с. Точнее он сам. Если невозможно отметить как территорию, то точкой. Детская площадка отмечается так http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dplayground
user_5359 (2016-06-28 08:02:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you notice the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134592272 ? You add a second hotel to the same building!

If you need help you are welcome!
mavl (2019-01-04 16:59:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-04 16:59:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Alecs01 (2016-08-09 19:37:39+00:00): Hi, are you sure these are really hospitals? names and positions look strange at best
mavl (2019-01-04 16:59:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
uvi (2017-02-24 12:08:36+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4268044662
Handelt es sich hierbei um einen richigen Milchautomaten oder nur um eine Verkaufsstelle?
Kommen Waren aus dem Regal, ist m.E. zusätzlich shop=farm mit der description, welche Sachen es dort gibt, korrekt. Sobald ein Automat steht, sollte der doch so auch erscheinen und recherchierbar sein. Einige vertreten auch die Meinung, dass der Punkt mit shop=dairy ergänzt werden sollte. Ich denke, es empfiehlt sich folgendes Beispiel ganz gut: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264211545 . 
Bist du ortskundig, kannst du dies ändern?
Gruß Uwe
Lifeguardsurfer (2017-02-24 13:29:11+00:00): Also das hier ist ein Milchautomat und zusätzlich noch ein weiterer Wurstautomat, keine Verkaufsstelle
uvi (2017-02-24 13:32:42+00:00): Sollten dann nicht zwei Automaten auch in OSM stehen? Kennst du die Zahlungsweisen, Betreiber, Öffnungszeiten ...? Kannst du den aktuellen Zustand nachtragen/ändern?
Lifeguardsurfer (2017-02-24 13:36:40+00:00): Habe ein paar Attribute ergänzt...
TZorn (2016-06-27 14:36:39+00:00): Hi Matthew, what is it exactly what you are mapping here? You have created a couple of hundred "artworks" (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dartwork) without any more specific description but some incomprehensible number as their names. Are you aware that you are adding to a public database here?
woodpeck_repair (2016-07-14 21:00:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 40750009 where the changeset comment is: revert tourism=artwork additions of Matthew Landicho after no response was given in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40320950
user_5359 (2016-06-28 08:03:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
marczoutendijk (2016-06-27 15:23:59+00:00): Welkom Guido!
Weet je zeker dat de vorm niet klopte?
Alle gebouwen in NL worden geïmporteerd vanuit het BAG/Kadaster, en wat jij er nu op hebt getekend komt niet meer overeen met wat er in de BAG staat.
Hou je er rekening mee dat luchtfoto's ernstig vertekend kunnen zijn?
Jij hebt het gebouw nu bv. over een voetpad heen getekend.
Hoe heb jij de vorm bepaald?
Lees ook mijn welkomstmail.
marczoutendijk (2016-06-27 15:37:24+00:00): Ik stuurde je ook een prive-bericht met een screenshot waarop je de verschillen kunt zien.
Commodoortje (2016-06-27 23:00:19+00:00): De vorm was excact dezelfde als in de BAG staat. Helaas klopt de vorm nu niet meer, tevens loopt het pad er dwars doorheen.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/30krnsr99uufg1l/2016-06-28_00-39-26.png?raw=1
.
Wil je dat ik het corrigeer naar de oorspronkelijke BAG vorm?
Anders ga ik er vanuit dat jij het doet.

Mocht het zijn dat de BAG inderdaad afwijkt, wil je dan contact opnemen middels een terugmeldformulier naar BAG?

https://www.kadaster.nl/web/formulier/BAG-formulieren/BAG-terugmeldingsformulier.htm

https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#/?searchQuery=9728PH&objectId=0014100010912487&geometry.x=233368.35728125&geometry.y=579089.41025625&zoomlevel=14&detailsObjectId=
Commodoortje (2016-06-27 23:03:32+00:00): Verkeerd plaatje geplakt, dit is de juiste:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/de5nov6ys9nk5tm/2016-06-28_00-53-47.png?raw=1
marczoutendijk (2016-06-28 08:23:13+00:00): Als Guido vandaag niet reageert Commodoortje, doe jij dan een revert?
Ik kan me niet voorstellen dat zijn "vorm" de juiste is.
Commodoortje (2016-06-28 21:57:40+00:00): Inmiddels gerevert
SomeoneElse (2016-06-29 11:58:54+00:00): Can you please explain the changeset comment here "Perhaps it will give more space."?
Geography Canada (2016-07-02 19:09:30+00:00): I think I added another space for some extra space (maybe so that the Arabic and English are not on the same line that they are rendered). Will see how it turns out in a few months (or 1 month) when it finally renders.
Nakaner (2016-06-28 13:49:41+00:00): Bitte zeichne, wenn möglich, die Bahnsteige als Flächen (geschlossene Ways bzw. Multipolygon-Relationen). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427618040
eggie (2017-11-18 16:51:20+00:00): Opnieuw Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Nakaner (2016-06-27 21:43:40+00:00): Bitte löscht nicht einfach Relationen, die ihr für "unwichtig" haltet, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4234482/history (Bottwartalbahn-Streckenrelation). Ich habe die Route wiederhergestellt.
Touristikgemeinschaft HeilbronnerLand (2016-06-28 06:20:01+00:00): Das tut mir leid, war nicht mit Absicht. Ich dachte ich hätte nur die zweite angelegte Relation SB2 gelöscht. Habe die Relation Bottwartalbahn keineswegs für unwichtig erachtet.
changchun_1 (2016-07-18 10:21:48+00:00): Hallo Touristikgemeinschaft,
bitte etwas mehr Sorgfalt. Schon wieder ein total verschobener Punkt. Bitte korrigieren.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/418923988
Gruß changchun_1
Commodoortje (2016-06-27 22:48:34+00:00): De door je aanggebrachte highway:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427617287
was al aanwezig op OSM.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283800275
Ik heb de dubbele highway verwijderd.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/30krnsr99uufg1l/2016-06-28_00-39-26.png?raw=1

Tevens is het niet gebruikelijk om persoonlijke gegevens zoals namen van families op een adresnode te zetten. Ook deze naam heb ik verwijderd

Uw poi/note is voor de hele wereld zichtbaar. Bedenk dat OSM niet bedoeld is voor persoonlijke notes/poi's.
Commodoortje (2016-06-27 22:50:20+00:00): Uw poi/note is voor de hele wereld zichtbaar. Bedenk dat OSM niet bedoeld is voor persoonlijke notes/poi's.
Greg_Rose (2017-10-06 20:40:42+00:00): Objects are fake, and do not exist. User has had over a year to respond to changeset comments - many of the user's object additions have been shown to be bogus (repeating names and derivations of the same name; phone numbers with country/area codes from other places; bus stops on side streets and alleys that couldn't possibly accommodate a bus, etc). 
Deleting/reverting.
pyram (2016-07-23 18:52:16+00:00): Danke fürs mithelfen, aber hier bitte klären: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/639696
Nebenbei: Wie auch in der benachbarten Fehlermeldung angezweifelt wird: In D wird Straße im allgemeinen mit scharfem ß geschrieben - hier doch sicher auch ;-)
mavl (2016-06-27 18:04:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы удаляете существующую дорожку. Причём, делаете это не в первый раз. В одном из комментариев к пакету правок вы пишете  
«Удалил созданную мной дорожку, т.к. не согласен с изменением её статуса. Оставляю за автором изменений право и возможность отрисовать аналогичную дорожку самостоятельно без использования результатов моего труда.»  
  
Несогласие с изменениями не является основанием для удаления объекта в OpenStreetMap. Основанием для удаления является отсутствие объекта на местности. Если вы не согласны с использованием вашего труда, то зачем вы приняли правила участия в проекте [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Open_Database_License/Contributor_Terms]?  
  
Прошу вас не удалять больше эту дорожку. Участники сообщают, что на местности она существует. Если вас не устраивает её статус, то давайте обсудим это на форуме.
highflyer74 (2016-06-29 11:34:13+00:00): Hello!

Can you have a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/74700665? The tagging Pascal field=english does not seem to be OSM tagging...

Thank you!
SomeoneElse (2016-06-29 12:01:53+00:00): Is this really named "Walkway to Ternhill Crescent" or is that just a description of what it is?  See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for more details.
Geography Canada (2016-07-02 18:35:27+00:00): No, it is the name described on the 162 bus.
SomeoneElse (2016-06-29 11:56:35+00:00): Is this actually a bus station, and not a bus stop?
Geography Canada (2016-07-02 18:34:50+00:00): I didn't know there was a difference.
SomeoneElse (2016-07-02 18:39:47+00:00): A bus station is typically what you get at the end of a route - think railway station, but for buses.  
A bus stop is where you wait at the side of a road for a bus.
Geography Canada (2016-10-24 15:02:15+00:00): Thanks :)!
scai (2016-06-27 19:33:29+00:00): Hier fehlt noch irgendein place-Attribut (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:place). Vielleicht place=locality? Oder wohnt hier jemand? Dann wäre place=isolated_dwelling besser.
scai (2016-06-27 19:30:21+00:00): Name ist nur der Name: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Bitte stattdessen note verwenden.
scai (2016-07-03 11:35:49+00:00): Hab es korrigiert, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4268264859.
scai (2016-06-28 06:00:09+00:00): Wenn das Hotel geschlossen ist dann muss hier tourism=hotel weg. Ansonsten ist es nach wie vor als Hotel gekennzeichnet, hat nur keinen Namen mehr.

Idealerweise lässt man das alte Attribut stehen indem man den disused-Namensraum verwendet setzt. In diesem Fall wäre also disused:tourism=hotel sinnvoll.
scai (2016-07-19 17:19:04+00:00): Habe nun die Tags für das Hotel und Restaurant entsprechend entfernt...
zors1843 (2016-06-27 18:15:21+00:00): P.M. to mapper
Hjart (2016-06-27 19:44:22+00:00): Jeg har slettet denne i det der i forvejen var en tunnel.

Velkommen til vores projekt i øvrigt og tak for dine bidrag.
Geography Canada (2016-07-03 19:26:44+00:00): Sorry, bus stop.
Geography Canada (2016-07-05 18:03:01+00:00): Fixed, see here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40501174.
letihu (2016-10-22 21:24:26+00:00): Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/427631464/history
fehlt wohl noch etwas.
maraf24 (2016-06-28 07:15:12+00:00): Nie ma tutaj takiej ulicy:)
Adres to po prostu "58-173 Gniewków 41".
trigpoint (2016-06-28 09:15:17+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Please remember that this is a public database and should not be used for personal POIs.
Please keep adding genuine verifiable POI, but please use genuine tags and do not mistag.
I am removing this as it is not a hotel and does not belong in OSM
Владимир К (2016-06-28 06:50:13+00:00): Но ведь это не район выезда, а гидрант. Оставляйте, пожалуйста, соответствующие комментарии.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-03 22:16:30+00:00): Hello,
I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.  Questions have been raised about the accuracy of the boundaries of Morocco, and I'm sending this message to many of the mappers who have edited in the area or expressed an interest, including you.

We're aware that there is disputed territory in the region.  Most notably the area covered by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara , and also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceuta and other areas to the north.

First, it's worth mentioning https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  That explains that what matters most to OSM in terms of names, borders and boundaries is the "on the ground" rule.  For example, if a majority of the population of an area speaks language "a" then it makes sense for OSM's "name" tag to be in language "a" (though of course other name tags such as name:b, name:c etc. can also be used to make maps in other languages).  Similarly, if the people of an area consider themselves to be part of country "a" and country "a" does indeed have control over the area, it makes sense for the area to be part of country "a" (and only country "a") in OSM.

Potential problems in the area covered by the Morocco admin_level 2 relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 include:

1) That relation includes not only the part of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara currently administered by Morocco (the part west of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 ), it also includes the part of that territory east of it too.  Is this correct?  It seems at odds with OSM's "on the ground" rule, and with the UN peacekeepers' position described at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/minurso/background.shtml .

2) That relation also includes territories administered by Spain such as Ceuta and Melilla.  What evidence is there that Morocco controls these territories and that Spain does not?

Another major question, (largely dependant on the answer to (1) above) is:

3) If the area east of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 isn't part of Morocco, what status should it have?  http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=195838 did represent this territory and had several different admin levels before it was deleted.

The DWG would be grateful for your opinions on these matters.  You can either reply here or, if you prefer you can email data@osmfoundation.org directly and we'll read through all the replies.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-30 21:12:56+00:00): Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area.  The findings and the changes that will be made are described at 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 .  If you have any further comments you can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org
Thanks,
Andy
allendun03 (2018-11-12 16:26:22+00:00): https://creationweb.gr/
mueschel (2016-06-27 18:46:50+00:00): Hi,
there are 109 ways with the tag "numlanes" added recently. Common tagging uses the key "lanes". Could you change that?

Jan
Rps333 (2016-06-27 20:59:21+00:00): Yes. May take a day or so.