piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Кремлёвский штурман (2022-03-03 03:47:14+00:00): Чего я от Вас и добивался. Благодарю!
Osmwithspace (2025-03-09 10:07:53+00:00): Ist club=scout wirklich passend für
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/116014565/ ?
VA00 (2022-03-03 20:46:40+00:00): A głaz jest?
Adam_Piszczek (2022-03-03 23:13:27+00:00): Gdzie ma być?jak nic nie ma ,jaki to niby bunkier miałby być?
VA00 (2022-03-04 06:13:06+00:00): Nie wiem, najpierw był głaz, potem ktoś zmienił na bunkier, pewnie nie wiadomo co to było. Takie rzeczy nie znikają, może pozycja była błędna? Ale skoro nie widać teraz, jak nie ma liści, to dziwne.
Adam_Piszczek (2022-03-04 08:51:48+00:00): Jeśli pozycja to na mapie,bo w terenie nie ma a stoisz według gps i nic tam nie widać ,do korekty fragment tej ścieżki co niby przy tym bunkrze jest.
Adam_Piszczek (2022-03-04 22:53:38+00:00): Jeśli kolega tam będzie niech sprawdzi.
VA00 (2022-03-05 06:32:37+00:00): No ale jak mam sprawdzić, jak punkt usunięty i nie wiem gdzie był... na przyszłość lepiej nie usuwać, tylko zdjąć tagi i dodać fixme.
Adam_Piszczek (2022-03-19 21:24:05+00:00): Definitywnie nic tam nie ma ,rozpoznanie terenu w promieniu kilku metrów od tego miejsca niby bunkru i nic. Pozycja to N 50°11'49,06"
E 019°12'24,51"
jb54osm (2022-02-28 11:19:37+00:00): Dag mgn2016,

Op of naast de Noordsingel is het niet verboden te lopen - of het verstandig is, is een tweede. Slechts fietsen en brommen is verboden. Tot 2015/2016 was er een loopverbod met bord, maar nu niet meer.
Ik zal de verboden verwijderen.
abakus_uploader (2022-02-27 23:31:47+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2022-03-30 05:40:04+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035842028. Did yo mean building=yes instead of yes=yes?
Tritanor (2022-03-30 07:18:31+00:00): Yes, thanks for spotting this. I have fixed it now.
PolyDunami (2022-02-27 20:59:41+00:00): In this changeset, I've added several buildings to the campsite on Julius Drive. This arrangement is a rough estimate based on records found on Whatcom County's Property Assessor. A further survey will be useful in accurately aligning these buildings since aerial imagery shows obscuration by foliage.
maxerickson (2022-02-28 05:09:06+00:00): Hi-

The convention for addr:state is to use the two letter postal abbreviation. It's not a big issue, just wanted to give you a heads up before doing anything.


Max
PolyDunami (2022-02-28 18:04:13+00:00): Thank you, Max. I've taken a look at the information on the tag of addr:state. It looks like the tag was constructed with the postal abbreviation in mind.

My changesets include the addition of addresses in Canada and it seems there's room for correction there as well. The convention north of the American border is to use the tag, addr:province instead of addr:state.
maxerickson (2022-02-28 19:40:08+00:00): There is a search to select feature in the Java based editor that makes it pretty straightforward to address a change like is needed here. Happy to walk you through how to do it, or alternatively, I can carry out the changes myself.

Max
SomeoneElse (2022-03-01 21:44:47+00:00): Hello,
Just wondered if the deletion of the EDs inc https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12490411 was deliberate?
Best Regards,
Andy
Boggedy (2022-03-06 17:09:55+00:00): I found there were 2 sets of EDs in Donegal or more properly 2 sets of admin_level=9 boundaries where there should only be one. Every part of the land area should also be part of an ED ...right out to the middle of Lough Foyle. 

There is a separate problem in NI ....they have not had admin_level=9 status since 1923 but at least they are not duplicated there.
Boggedy (2022-03-06 17:11:11+00:00): @SomeoneElse @Boggedy test notify
SomeoneElse (2022-03-06 17:14:02+00:00): I got the message ...
Boggedy (2022-03-06 17:42:28+00:00): I didn't get any message, maybe only the comment creator does.??
Boggedy (2022-03-06 18:06:03+00:00): Admin Level boundaries should be unique and should be part of the NUTS/LAU stack for a territory.  Brexit won't change anything other than the names of the statistical codes...whenever they get around to that. 

This is the NI stack 

https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/geography/ukgeographies/eurostat#northern-ireland

and the lacuna in NI is that EDs were abolished in 1923 and replaced by similar "Wards" . Tagging EDs with admin levels is incorrect These wards are the correct LAU2 / Admin Level 8 or 9 entity for NI. However as the EDs were used for census data in NI as late as the 1950s the EDs should be converted to boundary=historic from boundary=admin, admin level deleted and from dates of 1850 to date 1923 added.  I'll leave that lacuna to my colleagues in NI and they are welcome to contact me on the subject any time...the lacuna has been discussed on talk-ie going back to around 2014/5. 



Separately I see that OSMF Ireland is  intending to convene a Boundaries working group under @Mackerski but I have not heard anything about its activities...glad to help there if asked.  See

https://www.openstreetmap.ie/osm-ireland-working-groups/

Also see > https://www.ons.gov.uk/methodology/geography/ukgeographies/eurostat

and

https://www.townlands.ie/mappers/

I have been on boundaries for a long time.
SomeoneElse (2022-03-06 18:16:48+00:00): (re messages) you should get everyone else's messages but not your own.  Maybe check the email address you have registered at osm.org (or your spam box?).
SomeoneElse (2022-03-06 18:18:19+00:00): (re boundaries) I've long since given up understanding what boundaries are mapped in Ireland (either side of the border), but I saw these versions disappear so I thought that I'd better mention it :)
Boggedy (2022-03-06 18:46:14+00:00): If they were simple then Poor old Dermot wouldn't have agreed to chair a working group on the issue. There is a profusion of historic boundaries ...some of which have not been abolished in law since the foundation of the state over 100 years ago and they may well need excision from the base map and a bulk import into openhistoricalmap instead along with a tagging exercise to clean them up a tad.  

The current profusion causes an undue amount of JOSM validation errors for my taste. It is a hindrance to the betterment of the actuality...to coin an aphorism. 

This > https://openhistoricalmap.org/history#map=8/54.030/-7.806&layers=O&date=1900&daterange=1800,2022 ins

That would be my preferred solution  anyway if Dermo reaches out for a natter on the matter. @RoryM may wish to bulk import them into his invaluable townlands.ie site at some stage pre or post tag cleanup as well and I always defer to Rorys wishes.
b-unicycling (2022-03-06 23:52:56+00:00): I had added the EDs in NI and some parts of the Republic for the Sensible Code company last year, but if I recall, we had long discussions in the Telegram group and I had put a date on all those boundaries to mark them as not current. Therefore, I wasn't sure how there could be duplicates. There were even changes between 1901 and 1911, but I think we settled on me using 1911 then, bc Sensible Code wanted to use it for their software for the 1911 census. The launch is available to watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCKcBRix-bg.
It would have been better to put it all into openhistoricalmaps, but I did not know of its existence then, and I still don't know how to use JOSM for it.
Boggedy (2022-03-07 01:51:52+00:00): An admin boundary is _always_ current and everything else is boundary=historic. However EDs are not admin boundaries in NI. Even worse...the nomenclature itself forked c 1993 with DEDs becoming EDs in the south from that time. EDs created since 1983 in the South, as a City boundary revision for example were never a DED but the vast majority are. 

The same principle applies to constituencies, the current ones are boundary=political and others are also historic. I am not aware of the status of civil parishes in NI but they are still legally extant down here as are baronies. 

Cleaning all this up will take some time and I pinged Mackerski to weigh in. It has to be dealt with soon as JOSM generates too many validation errors now because of this boundary profusion and this is an obstacle to good editing. 

My last mesoscale task was 3 years back when i did local electoral boundaries and i had nothing like the errors i see nowadays, sometimes 100s, almost all boundaries.
b-unicycling (2022-03-07 09:45:56+00:00): If there is a way to export the 1911 (D)EDs to openhistoricalmaps, pls let me know, so we can save that work somehow, before deleting it from OSM. Anyway, thanks for taking on that huge tidying task.
Boggedy (2022-03-07 14:13:43+00:00): I do not really propose to delete anything from OSM  and please be aware that in the vast majority of cases a 1911 ED is still a 2022 ED and that boundaries have not changed since for most of then, but I propose to  1. ...systemically...clean the data up tagging wise while in situ.  2. decide what boundaries we want to 'archive and what we want to keep'  ...and why and 3 ensure that any boundary that we remove has a home to go to ,..EG to OHM . This is a complex issue best left to a working group and anybody contributing here would be equally welcome in any such group which has to act transparently and fairly and which has to satisfy OSMUK and OSMIE both 

The end result should be a fully consistent NUTS/LAU stack which is what admin boundaries are. A consistent political stack is needed in parallel, perhaps a soupcon of arcane ones like Civil Parishes and the rest are history.
user_5359 (2022-02-28 11:06:00+00:00): Hallo! Du verwendest als Erster den Schlüssel pegelnr. Die Bezeichnung sind allerdings in der Regel in Kleinbuchstaben und in britischen Englisch gehalten. Was hältst Du von ref:operator?
parsd51 (2022-02-28 19:10:25+00:00): Hej Hans

Jeg vil lige gøre opmærksom på at veje generelt ikke skal forbindes til områder, med undtagelser som indgang og bygningspassager etc.
Det er bl.a. ikke muligt for navigation at lede via områder, kun veje.

Jeg har tilrettet stien.

Hilsen
parsd51
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-13 19:26:17+00:00): Hi Derek, FYI most "congregational" churches in CT / New England can be more accurately tagged with denomination=united_church_of_christ rather than denomination=congregational. Rocky Hill Congregational is UCC like most of them, though the one in Wethersfield is not.
cytryn (2022-02-27 21:15:45+00:00): W uzupełnieniu do komentarza: podział obszarów drogowych wg rzeczywistych linii podziału wzoru nawierzchni
abakus_uploader (2022-02-27 23:31:48+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-02-27 23:31:49+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Frans S (2022-03-02 16:18:28+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping ,
A remark.
When you add a highway , tag it as well and don't add it to other nodes than roads. Don't you use the highway plugin?
Best regards
KingVik (2022-03-03 13:26:22+00:00): Noted
user_2066394 (2022-03-02 17:01:43+00:00): Im westlichen Teil aber andere Dachform?
map per (2022-03-02 20:19:07+00:00): Strenggenommen ja
user_2066394 (2022-03-03 09:29:56+00:00): Hab das mal anskizziert mit building:part=* wie beim angrenzenden Haus
gogeo (2022-02-28 10:27:37+00:00): fixed
Jrachi (2022-02-28 09:09:10+00:00): Attento!
Hai interrotto tre relazioni!
Probabilmente hai suddiviso una rotonda (inutile) e per qualche motivo devi avere ignorato l'avviso dell'editor.
Ripristina la situazione per favore...
Ivo
user_5239402 (2022-03-03 09:17:30+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Allison P (2022-03-03 17:08:23+00:00): Yeah, I saw that one coming. Last year I did some bulk edits on Mormon churches and uploaded them per state/country (depending on area). It took several times longer, which isn't really worth it.
BCNorwich (2022-03-01 07:51:02+00:00): Hi, I've removed the duplicated highway.

Regards Bernard.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-02 20:01:37+00:00): If you are removing something don't just move it to an adjacent field. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/490365620
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117923858
Scottie0001 (2022-03-02 01:45:21+00:00): U-turns are not allowed here as there is a solid white line down middle of road
TheSwavu (2022-03-02 03:54:06+00:00): You don't use turn restrictions to map local laws. There is no "no u-turn" signs here.
TheSwavu (2022-03-02 03:54:59+00:00): See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction for more details.
aceman444 (2022-04-03 10:36:11+00:00): Zdravim, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7552511811 preco cushion, ked su tam mini_bumps? Zeby to za mesiac zmenili?
Jose Riha (2022-04-03 11:49:47+00:00): dobry, jedna sa o chybu. opravil som spolu s dalsimi zle otagovanymi retardermi. dakujem za upozornenie.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-03 00:33:52+00:00): You added some duplicate ways in this changeset. Please be more careful
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117924260
lovelyfurball88 (2022-02-27 23:47:57+00:00): tagging mistakes in crossing made here were fixed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117925343
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117924668
Nachtspazz (2022-02-27 23:16:28+00:00): HW4 bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7873316016 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1864945744 unterbrochen.
Nachtspazz (2022-03-01 00:42:37+00:00): Hat sich erledigt. Ich habe die Verbindung gefunden und eingezeichnet.
user_5359 (2025-11-05 08:26:54+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1035870082. What is the mean of tag LAYER=3?
Rajev (2022-02-27 23:55:16+00:00): I see that you remove the Latin characters from the name tag then you replace them with UR name
Did you discuss with the Pakistani OSM community?
this case is repeated in several countries: Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, india etc.
your changes need to be reviewed
Vinber (2022-02-28 09:46:34+00:00): Hi Esneider, please, could you answer  to :
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117884518
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117885007

Regards
Jakka (2022-02-28 07:53:06+00:00): Het wissen van paden is niet de beste oplossing. Vroeg of laat komt deze er terug in.
Voeg access=private bij de code
bikingaround244 (2022-04-20 03:03:29+00:00): Hi for this moose hill street (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1014228143/history#map=15/42.1238/-71.2093) I noticed you changed it from residential to unclassified. I am wondering what makes this unclassified as opposed to residential?
aweech (2022-04-20 22:44:06+00:00): Hi,
Yes, there's a bunch of reasons that unclassified works better here. Mostly because there's like 2 residences on it and most travelers with a destination on this road would be visiting the sanctuary. Also it's a through-road and it makes a pretty decent way to detour around Sharon center and not have too many cars around you (if you don't mind the hill!). I couldn't find a posted speed limit, which means it's probably the state default of 40 mph, not exactly residential speeds.
catdreamer (2022-03-24 05:41:11+00:00): 私人註記請勿上傳OSM
jleedev (2022-03-08 01:40:33+00:00): What was the purpose of deleting these roads?
mrpulley (2025-01-01 09:55:50+00:00): 990640953 is now maxspeed 60 (possibly a recent change)
990640952 maxspeed correct
jleedev (2022-03-08 01:39:47+00:00): What was the purpose of deleting these roads?
theurbanexploringman (2022-03-09 00:08:22+00:00): I was rebuilding them
YPGGUUY (2023-06-10 19:43:37+00:00): fix vandalism: deleting existed buildings

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/137183839
Allison P (2022-03-08 01:05:44+00:00): Can you explain why you deleted over 80 service and residential roads?
ElliottPlack (2022-03-10 02:56:07+00:00): yes, please explain the deletes here.
user_5359 (2022-03-01 08:35:10+00:00): Hello! Please notice the correct notation of the key is ref:US-NY:swis (country code with upper case letter).
alyaa_hossam (2022-02-28 10:00:17+00:00): Hello Casablanca MG,
I noticed you added many "motorways "that didn't match any satellite images Could you provide us with the source you edited?
Examples:-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035886380/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035886373/history
Regards,
alyaa_hossam
mavl (2022-05-20 15:29:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
CurlingMan13 (2023-10-14 03:20:11+00:00): Any update on this "proposal" or whether construction is ever starting?  Or is it still *just* a proposal with no action being done?
Your Village Maps (2023-10-14 05:50:52+00:00): Here is the MnDOT page about it:

https://www.dot.state.mn.us/d6/projects/i90-hwy52/index.html
DP24PH (2022-02-28 05:24:36+00:00): Tip: You might need to separate the exit-only roadway portion with oneway=* tagging. I'll have this corrected immediately upon this publication of the comment.


DP24
DP24PH (2022-02-28 05:39:55+00:00): Changeset Erratum: c117929253 via https://osm.org/changeset/117929253

DP24
mrpulley (2025-01-01 10:15:53+00:00): 5152377 was maxspeed 50, changed by you to 60, but is maxspeed 50 (fixed by mrsussymanchild at changeset 155445117)
1035888769, 1035888768 wrong maxspeed in this changeset, but corrected by you in a later changeset
5152566, 1035888771, 990640952 maxspeed 50
1035888772, 1035888770 maxspeed correct
mavl (2022-05-20 15:29:16+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Maria Bombardil (2022-04-03 06:50:21+00:00): 请阁下不要随便更改本地人实地考察的情况而加以修改过的元素。
mavl (2022-05-20 15:29:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:46:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:46:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
user_5359 (2022-03-01 15:41:58+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035891698, http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035891696. What ist the meaning of the tags
    ADMIN_ST = UT
    CASEFILE_N = UNK
    GlobalID = 0722950b-b263-4d38-8c49-3aad2624f368
    NLCS_ID = NLCS000960
    NLCS_NAME = Inholding
    ROD_DATE = 9999-09-09
    WSA_AUTH = 0
    WSA_RCMND = No recommendation
    WSA_SUITAB = 0
?
pmckay419 (2022-03-01 16:17:15+00:00): Oops, those were left over from the source GIS shapefiles. I meant to delete those. I'll do that later.
pmckay419 (2022-03-01 16:31:47+00:00): Actually those were both duplicate lines I missed deleting. I just went in and deleted both of those.
wireguy (2022-03-01 11:55:46+00:00): Gilfong, you have broken the Atlantic Intercoastal Waterway Relation, and created a lateral water hazard...  Can you revert your change and read how to map golf courses at the wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
mavl (2022-05-20 15:46:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:46:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
jumbanho (2022-03-07 11:12:07+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding these trails.  There are long sections that are marked as bridges.  Is this a mistake or are there really long boardwalks on this trail?
Doostan (2022-03-08 03:11:23+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out! There are a couple small boardwalk sections, but they certainly aren't the entire path. I must have misunderstood how OSM applied the automatic bridge over the small stream. I'll make sure this gets fixed.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:46:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mvexel (2023-08-24 01:52:36+00:00): Hey Kepler, how's it going? Do you have time to see if this flag is the old or the new design? And keep an eye on it if / when it updates?
Kepler Sticka-Jones (2023-09-24 22:07:20+00:00): Hey Martjin! Doing alright, moved up to Murray last December so I've been hanging out mostly around there and the office in Lehi. But I drove by this flagpole this weekend while visiting family Cottonwood Heights and it appears to still be the old state flag.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 19:09:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117991172 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
legofahrrad (2022-04-07 18:34:43+00:00): Hallo,
bitte beachte die Lifecycle-Präfixe¹ – z. B. für abgerissene Gebäude. Wenn du die Gebäude ganz löschst, kann der nächste sie wieder vom Luftbild abzeichnen. Mit einem Präfix wie "demolished:*" sieht man dann im Editor, dass das Gebäude abgerissen wurde.
Ich stelle die beiden Gebäude wieder her, sodass das Problem nicht mehr besteht.
Beste Grüße!


[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Glassman (2022-03-03 00:35:08+00:00): #TIP: The area you added is already inside of a landuse=residential. Though I'm not sure what residential=rural would mean in this case since it's inside the city.

I'm going to remove the building=cowshed - looks like open land
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117929782
Warin61 (2022-04-21 23:18:47+00:00): area=yes on way 1035904925 makes no sense. tag deleted. 

area=yes on Way: 1035904926 make no sense. The way does not need to be included in the tree multipolygon and can simply be tagged as a tree area. 

I think you have used Maxar imagery for some of this, this is probably the  most upto date, use the DCS for fine detail (resolution).