piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skquinn (2021-12-07 10:03:26+00:00): Hi,

In the future, could you please confine your changesets to smaller areas and use more descriptive changeset comments?

Per the bounding box, it's obvious the changeset is (at least mostly) in the US so "america" really doesn't tell us anything new. Normally a changeset's bounding box should fit inside a single US state, maybe stretching across the border of two others if changes are near a border.
AndersAndersson (2021-12-05 22:02:16+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!
I'm afraid you changeset introduces a lot of errors. Wrong geometry of Krafttanken, wrong speed limits, it if most probably lowered to 60 from 70 km/h, no increased to 80 km/h. Duplicate shops at Willys and OKQ8, removed building-tag at OKQ8 etc.
I will revert your changeset (in 114596206), but readd some of your changes that where correct.
Please let me know if I can be of some assistance.
MxxCon (2021-12-06 00:33:08+00:00): Hello.
Looking at the streetview imagery of this place, it seems like it is only on the first floor and 2nd floor is residential.
As such, please note that unless a business occupies the whole building, it should be mapped as a separate node point within the perimeter of that building.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114595319
seewäldler (2021-12-06 11:56:54+00:00): Hallo m-gu-b!
mit diesem changeset verschiebst du die Knoten der stop_position auf und mit der durchgehenden Straße einige Male so, dass die eigentlich gerade verlaufende Straße dort nun Knicke hat, die es so im Strassenverlauf nicht gibt. Welche Korrekturen wolltest du mit deinen Änderungen erreichen?
seewäldler (2021-12-07 09:41:19+00:00): Hallo!
In deinen Änderungen sehe ich nur ein südliches Verschieben aller Punkte, das ich als Versehen deute, darum wollte ich den ganzen changeset revertieren. Dabei gibt es aber bereits Probleme. Schaust du dir das noch einmal an?
Jillis inactivE (2022-09-16 17:58:38+00:00): Hi, landuse=military op het hoofdgebouw van Batterij bij Durgerdam is incorrect. Sowieso krijgt een gebouw nooit een landgebruik, het is ook al lang niet meer in functie volgens mij.
KB-01 (2022-09-16 18:32:00+00:00): Understood, I have removed the tag
jaap de vries (2021-12-06 13:13:26+00:00): Als het een bouwweg betreft deze dan wel als construction taggen, als de bouwweg een woonerf wordt of straat dan deze goed taggen. Pas je e.e.a. zelf aan?
WandelendeFietser (2021-12-06 20:26:16+00:00): Jaap, Bedankt voor je reactie en de tips.
De nu ingetekende wegen zijn wel gewoon toegankelijk, maar nog niet verhard. 
Dat geldt voor de Van Wijnbergenstraat, de Van Baerstraat en de Van Haersolteweg.
Zodra de bestrating definitief is, zal ik de tags aanpassen. 
Mocht het zo zijn dat de tags nu toch aangepast moeten worden, laat dat dan even weten.
nfgusedautoparts (2021-12-06 15:38:15+00:00): what is the purpose of this way? it does not contain the entire park, just a relatively small portion of it.
Arlo James Barnes (2021-12-07 16:37:40+00:00): for the changeset: Just to change the name from 'anmial' to 'animal'. for the way: not sure, didn't make it...it may in fact be useless and worth deleting but I didn't want to be the one to make that call.
mosstreet (2021-12-08 23:29:10+00:00): Волгоградский проспект 103А 105А Квартиры #1009382681 Квартиры #1009382682
adiatmad (2022-01-03 06:55:11+00:00): Hello Vivian Lin 19. Hope you are doing well.

What is the number meaning after tag "building" ?
Example (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1009383712)

Cheers,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114595927
daganzdaanda (2021-12-06 22:54:41+00:00): C'est un nom drôle ;-)
Mais vraiment, svp veulliez lire / chercher dans le wiki...
Quand un magasin n'existe plus, on peut par exemple utiliser "disused:shop=clothes" et "old_name=Le Faou".
ma-rt-in (2021-12-08 17:21:40+00:00): Hallo,
wie genau ist den vor Ort die Beschilderung des Weges?

vg
beewee (2021-12-08 17:49:31+00:00): Hi,
bzgl. der »genauen Beschilderung«: Mehr dazu morgen nach meinem Jog, okay?! ;-)
Stand der Dinge: Es ist ein für Fußgänger nutz- und -- nach monatelangem Sperr-Intermezzo von ›Hamburg Wasser‹ -- meines Wissens nach auch wieder offiziell freigegebener asphaltierter Weg.
beewee (2021-12-08 17:52:10+00:00): Sorry, es muss heißen: 
... für Fußgänger nutzbarer und ...
ma-rt-in (2021-12-08 18:34:17+00:00): ja reicht auch morgen ;)

vg
beewee (2021-12-09 14:48:29+00:00): Moin ma-rt-in,
von der »Landseite« folgendermaßen beschriftete Hinweisschilder: »Unebener Weg. Betreten auf eigene Gefahr.« sowie »Radfahren verboten.« 
Von der Tarpenbek-Seite aus gibt's keine Extra-Schilder, somit gilt wie in diesem kompletten (im Besitz von ›Hamburg Wasser‹ befindlichen) Abschnittes entlang des Baches: »Arbeits- und Schauweg. Betreten auf eigene Gefahr.«

Summa summarum also m.E. eine Bestätigung meiner »Umwidmung« -- oder siehst Du das anders?!
Herzliche Grüße aus HH-Langenhorn
von beewee :)
ma-rt-in (2021-12-18 16:49:42+00:00): hey sry für die späte antwort.
also ich würde es von den access subkeys so erfassen:
access=permissive, bicycle=no mehr nicht.
vg
beewee (2021-12-18 17:03:12+00:00): Hmm, sehe als Unterschied zur aktuellen Definition nur, dass bei Deinem Vorschlag »Fußgänger=yes« fehlt ... kann man weglassen, muss man aber nicht, imho.
ma-rt-in (2021-12-18 17:05:24+00:00): nicht nur foot=yes, sondern auch motor_vehicle=no da ja nicht verboten
beewee (2021-12-18 17:16:55+00:00): Und genau so war und ist es bereits eingetragen. Und selbstverständlich ist Fahrrad + Rad verboten, hatte ich ja oben bereits berichtet.
Schönes Wochenende, ma-rt-in! :-)
beewee (2021-12-18 17:17:50+00:00): (Fahrrad + Auto muss es natürlich heißen. :)
aTarom (2021-12-06 12:37:43+00:00): Way: Too Much (1009389016)
hi, if this name is from mtbiking you have the specific label
mtb:name=Too Much

"Sometimes trails have names that are only used by mountainbikers and not official. Use mtb:name to specify them."

More info at:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking
Cheers
kai-bcn (2022-02-16 10:42:36+00:00): Thank you so much ... I'll use that. I only got notification about this comment 2 days ago, here I see it as 2 months ago - that's weird, huh?
daganzdaanda (2021-12-06 23:08:16+00:00): Je ne comprends pas ça. C'est le nom de la route ? Maintenant c'est une adresse à un noeud.
user_1566574 (2022-10-23 14:08:31+00:00): Merci pour la contribution !
Je vous invite à vous familiariser avec le fonctionnement d'OpenStreetMap (wiki.openstreetmap.org) pour de meilleures contributions.
Je m'occupe de corriger celle-ci, merci à vous !
maraf24 (2022-03-16 11:03:27+00:00): Farmyard https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009389917 ?
Ogródki/pola uprawne.
maro21 (2022-03-19 20:35:41+00:00): A nie jest to teren z zabudowaniami rolniczymi? ["An area of land with farm buildings like farmhouse, dwellings, farmsteads, sheds, stables"] Tak to wygląda na zdjęciach. W każdym razie nie wyglądało mi na grunty orne
Frans S (2021-12-23 14:06:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114596886
ovruni (2021-12-05 22:59:21+00:00): Hola, este conjunto de cambios es similar al conjunto de cambios 14588213, con respecto a los niveles y alturas, ademas de agregar un cuerpo de agua y usos de suelo que no existen.
Saludos
eggie (2021-12-06 06:48:00+00:00): 
Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback OSM is geen testomgeving. Al je edits komen daadwerkelijk in de data van OS.
Ik draai je wijzigingen even terug. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community 

reverted by changeset #114604802
eggie (2021-12-06 06:46:19+00:00): reverted by changeset #114604787
WoodWoseWulf (2021-12-09 23:13:35+00:00): Hi!
You have this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009391750/
as a building - maybe it should be farmland or similar?
SomeoneElse (2021-12-06 09:19:30+00:00): Hello - a quick question about the South West Coast Path west of Polperro.  Yesterday this is the route that it took: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1dOc
and today: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1dOd .
Is the removal of the section west of Polperro from the SWCP deliberate or accidental (sometimes things get moved because of bits of paths falling into the sea).
Also now https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009394481 no longer connects to the path to the west presumably that bit shouldn't be part of the SWCP any more?
Best Regards,
Andy
RaccoonFederation (2021-12-06 09:31:22+00:00): Thanks for pointing that out, I did make errors and accidentally remove sections of relations and not remove sections that I should have. I have now fixed it to how it should be. The spur near the cave entrance was never part of the SWCP.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-06 17:55:37+00:00): Great, thanks!
Nikkojp (2021-12-11 23:29:04+00:00): hi
HubMiner (2021-12-12 01:20:11+00:00): Hi
abakus_uploader (2021-12-06 23:32:09+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-07 09:12:03+00:00): Ciao Luca. Il tag tourism=picnic_site identifica una'area picnic (e non il singolo tavolo). E' quindi sufficiente inserire solo un nodo. Ciao, Andrea
WoodWoseWulf (2021-12-06 00:20:36+00:00): Hi Clara,

Welcome to OSM!

On OSM, with a few exceptions, we typically work off the idea of "one feature, one OSM element" which typically means you don't need to duplicate features such as parks and schools as both nodes and areas.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

For example, the park node you created for "Greenbiar local park" represents the same feature as the existing park area. The node doesn't need to exist as the area was already on the map.

Please feel free to reach out if you have any questions!
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:43:02+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274091
Glassman (2021-12-06 15:18:20+00:00): #TIP: There are no living streets by definition in the US. These are mainly found in Europe. Can you change it back to either residential or unclassified? Unclassified is basically a rural residential road. If you are wondering where these classifications came from, blame it on the British. OSM originated in England so we use the English road classifications. I'll send you more information on OSM  in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114598667
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:53:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274245
Warin61 (2021-12-06 22:50:26+00:00): One member relation  for water deleted - not a closed way. This was given to you in your upload warnings...
AndrewS (2021-12-07 02:25:25+00:00): Thanks! I don't know what happened here. I was attempting to fix a very messy set of stream areas from a previous version.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:46:47+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317338
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:46:48+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317338
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:43:03+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274091
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:53:11+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274245
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:47:20+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274165
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:38:51+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317242
Warin61 (2021-12-06 23:27:51+00:00): Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

The beach you added has some problems. 
First being Australian it would normally be a sand beach ... mud, rock are some other kinds of 'beaches'. So I'd add the tag 'surface=sand'. 
Second .. arr you have 2 beach areas mapped - confusing. One of them has errors - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009404700#map=15/-37.7795/149.1273 The way cross itself and that is a mistake. I'd simply delete that way - leaving the other one as the beach. The other one is  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009404701#map=15/-37.7795/149.1273 

Keep mapping.
Warin61 (2021-12-16 00:13:30+00:00): 
I have removed the offending way. 

The entry of the beach 'Tamboon - Sydenham Inlet'/Tamboon Inlet' over lays a past entry of the beach 'bemm river'.

All these 'names' look to me to be 'descriptions' ...
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

And https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
Warin61 (2021-12-16 00:14:42+00:00): Oh.. the over lay beach is 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007169299#map=17/-37.78032/148.96874
osm915 (2022-01-14 20:08:58+00:00): Hallo Laci
du hast auf dem Golfplatz in RiW etliche "kleine Golf-Wege" als hw=service getaggt. Aus meiner Sicht (ohne Golf-Ambitionen ;-) ist das nicht optimal.
In meinem Verständnis sind hw service für Zufahrtstraßen gedacht, die von normalen Kraftfahrzeugen genutzt werden können. Sie sollten daher zB nicht nur an einen hw track oder path angebunden sein (zB https://osm.org/way/1009405438) oder gar ganz isoliert sein (zB https://osm.org/way/1009405443).
Im Wiki habe ich zwar nichts ganz eindeutiges zu dem Thema gefunden, aber zumin verweist https://osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course auf https://osm.org/wiki/Talk:Key:access#Golf_cart und der Vorschlag dort geht in die Richtung hw path als hw-Grundtag zu verwenden.

Was meinst du?
Freundliche Grüße!
Laci (2022-01-15 08:45:11+00:00): Hallo osm915,
Ich habe die Wege so getaggt weil es von iD so vorgeschlagen wird. Highway=path soll eigentlich nur für nichtmotorisierten Verkehr genutzt werden, aber die Situation ist im wiki auch unklar. Vielleicht wäre highway=path hier wirklich besser.
Viele Grüße, Laci
osm915 (2022-01-17 20:33:28+00:00): Hallo Laci, der Hinweis mit iD war gut.
Ich hab mal ein wenig gesucht und interessanterweise steht dort gerade eine Änderung zu genau diesem Thema an (https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/327 enthält auch Links zu früheren Diskussionen bzgl. der Darstellung in carto und indirekt auch zu https://osm.org/wiki/Key:golf_cart und anderen tagging-Ideen https://osm.org/wiki/Proposed_features/golf_cart_path).

Aus meiner Sicht spricht kaum noch etwas gegen die vorgeschlagene Änderung von service in path.
Willst du deine "Golf-Wege" selbst korrigieren - es sind ja noch ein paar andere CS betroffen und du dürftest den besten Überblick haben oder soll ich mich kümmern. 
Freundliche Grüße!
Laci (2022-01-17 21:27:51+00:00): Hallo osm915, ich habe jetzt die Wege auf diesem Golfplatz korrigiert. Früher habe ich auch einige Golfplätze in Österreich bearbeitet, möglicherweise habe ich auch dort solche Wege getaggt. Da habe ich keine Überblick mehr, aber wenn ich in Zukunft es bemerke werde ich es korrigieren.
Viele Grüße, Laci
osm915 (2022-01-18 18:09:14+00:00): Danke!

Falls es dich interessiert und du die Möglichkeit noch nicht kennst: Mit https://overpass-turbo.eu lassen sich einfach bestimmt Elemente suchen. ZB findet
	way["golf"="cartpath"]({{bbox}})(user:Laci);
	out geom meta;
in dem gewählten Gebiet alle ways mit dem Tag golf=cartpath die zuletzt von dir editiert wurden.
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:46:49+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317338
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:47:21+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274165
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:43:04+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274091
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:53:12+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274245
his very self (2021-12-06 03:04:49+00:00): 20 feet North of the "Davis avenue "bridge seen here is a new footbridge over the water. 

the red walking path line over the bridge should be moved to the new footbridge
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:38:52+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317242
Warin61 (2022-08-27 02:00:06+00:00): Hi,
I looked for a beach named 'Surf' and did not find it.. is this just a description?
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:38:53+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317242
Hans Thompson (2021-12-06 22:47:10+00:00): Hello. I'm curious what your rubric is for determining when to change place? Glennallen has all the amenities of a town and contextually village has a different meaning here.
archpdx (2021-12-07 01:21:25+00:00): Hi, thanks for your feedback.
Generally what I've seen in the US is that villages are usually less than 1,000 people, which can also be seen on this wiki page: (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/United_States/Tags#Places). However, I understand that Alaska has less people than other states and might have different guidelines on how to tag urban areas. I could see Glennallen as a town with the amenities it has, but I feel that it isn't important enough to be classified as a city.
saranrapjs (2021-12-06 02:38:03+00:00): typo'd the commit message, i'd meant 33rd st!
arceyes (2021-12-11 06:48:49+00:00): 看你画了好多图，请加我微信：13618011356
rthik007 (2021-12-07 11:05:18+00:00): "Hi Haleigh V,
I have Removed all hanging ways 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114655577.
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114600330
WoodWoseWulf (2021-12-09 23:06:57+00:00): Hi cholmes1,

OSM is a public map, and your changes are visible to everyone. I will remove your personal information from this house.
ftcat (2021-12-06 08:08:04+00:00): Hi Kabandapk,

Thanks for mapping in Zambia. Many of the ways you are mapping are tracks in rural areas. Also I would advise not to use the residential tag on ways just because they have buildings near by, the residential tag is really for roads in towns and built up areas, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/East_Africa_Tagging_Guidelines, in particular 'Residential roads 	highway=residential 			Roads lined with housing. This tag is used only in urban or village areas and only on roads which do not serve a through connection function.' While it does mention village areas I do not think it applies to the typical African village that is not ordered along streets as elsewhere.

I am not familiar with RapiD but gather it uses AI, I am not a fan of AI in Africa as it is often way way out.

Could you provide a link to the HOT project 11862 as I can't seem to find it. I would just like to see what its aims are.

Thanks
clay_c (2021-12-08 19:10:30+00:00): Hi Ian,

Looks like you merged the Amtrak station node with the building outline here. Since the node represents the whole station, rather than just the building, please keep them separate going forward.

Partially reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114714240
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:47:22+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274165
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:46:50+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317338
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:43:05+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274091
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:53:13+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274245
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:29:59+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317108
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-29 04:30:00+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153317108
George McManus (2021-12-13 21:16:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
wkdgs (2021-12-06 13:27:23+00:00): Hi,

wieso dürfen/können hier keine Radfahrer lang fahren? Gibt es ein Schild oder einen Bordstein? Anhand der Luftbilder kann ich das nicht nachvollziehen.

Gruß
winkeldings
pd8JUHyoPJ (2021-12-06 14:43:58+00:00): Hallo,
survey: hier ein Bordstein ohne Absenkung.
VG
Rolf
Fizzie-DWG (2024-06-28 04:50:41+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153274210
Warin61 (2021-12-15 23:58:04+00:00): Hi,

What is the source of the beach name 'Tamboon - Sydenham Inlet'?
eggie (2021-12-06 06:49:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-06 06:53:08+00:00): Dag CCB   Het AZC staat al op de kaart vermeld. 

MVG
eggie
user_2066394 (2021-12-06 12:25:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1009480339

Was wurde aus der ursprünglich gebauten Gartenstraße?
snopas24 (2021-12-06 04:36:46+00:00): *Polygon is imported from RLIS ORCA dataset
Glassman (2021-12-06 15:27:21+00:00): #TIP: A tree_row is just a hedge of trees. From the imagery it doesn't look like a hedge.

You also deleted the downhill piste:type area? Can you explain why?

I'll send you more information on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114601949
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-06 20:07:00+00:00): Hi MusLak, please don't change river areas to waterway=riverbank.  That tag has been deprecated and is not in use in the US any more.  Instead, please use the water->river preset in JOSM.
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-06 20:08:45+00:00): Also, I noticed that you put a name tag on river areas.  River areas should have a blank name tag.  Please see my presentation on river tagging for more details:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c5YwXDKGr2Y

Thanks, and happy mapping!
Glassman (2021-12-06 15:30:34+00:00): #TIP: Leaving changeset comments is helpful to yourself and to the community. The comment should be short such as "Added house"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114602688
SherbetS (2021-12-10 16:49:39+00:00): thank you.
FasterTracker (2022-03-12 22:30:31+00:00): Atenção que parte do "footway" 1009487214 não tem a separação da estrada para ser considerado como tal
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-03-17 13:29:32+00:00): em que troço a 1009487214 se faz pela própria estrada?
FasterTracker (2022-03-17 15:54:00+00:00): Boa tarde!

Não é feita na própria estrada mas no passeio (não em via separada) adjacente à estrada.
O passeio é ligeiramente mais elevado que o normal mas creio que não seja o suficiente para afirmar que é uma via por si só.

Esta questão foi abordado no canal Telegram (podes pesquisar por "linha separada" e verás a mensagem do Pedro Lima a sintetizar isto que digo).

Para te responder à pergunta, apenas entre as duas saídas da autoestrada que faz sentido este troço ser mapeado como um caminho pedonal estando ligado às passadeiras já mapeadas.

Cumprimentos
FasterTracker (2022-03-17 15:55:07+00:00): *, estando este ligado às passadeiras já mapeadas.