piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glitch-Hunter (2022-01-05 15:37:31+00:00): then make the software better

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115433160
marczoutendijk (2022-01-05 15:54:22+00:00): You really don't understand the issue don't you?
I don't want to see in every detail what you have done, I (and other mappers too, see your changeset discussions: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=139107) simply what to know what you are doing in that area so that we can see if we are maybe working on the same thing and can avoid clashes.
You know how to do what we ask from you as you have shown in a number of changesets. Is it such a problem to add 5-6 words to your changesets?
Did you receive my PM from 18 december about this?
And remember, it's not me asking this, it is the OSM community as you can read here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards,  
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-10-09 05:05:02+00:00): atenção ao uso incorreto da ta college https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcollege

cumprimentos e boas edições
kubahahaha (2023-10-08 19:58:38+00:00): Cześć, ta nazwa Wirchne to nie powinna być cyrylicą? Wiesz jak to się pisze?
ivanbranco (2022-02-19 16:35:38+00:00): Ciao aa30mom,

https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1ggx

lungo tutta la via hai taggato degli indirizzi come "addr:city=gate", sarebbero da sistemare semplicemente in addr:city=Milano e basta o da sistemare e inoltre aggiungere barrier=gate?
aa30mom (2022-02-19 18:12:44+00:00): Ciao Ivanbranco,
Scusa sono da sistemare con addr:city=Milano, domani lo faccio. Ci dovrebbe essere entrance=yes. Per gli indirizzi in Osm copio i tag tranne il numero e poi li utilizzo per tutta la via, probabilmente ho fatto un errore che si è ripetuto per tutta la via.
John Kastner (2021-12-28 17:19:00+00:00): I have reverted this changeset along with changesets #115431980 , #115431686 , #115431664 , #115430418 , and #115430375 . Do upload such vandalism in the future.
John Kastner (2021-12-28 17:24:47+00:00): Do not*
EIRICKR (2022-01-05 16:10:46+00:00): just kidding
Wulfmorn (2024-07-18 09:24:21+00:00): This looks like an odd access tagging. Why is it not permitted to use this road? Is there a sign?
marczoutendijk (2022-01-04 09:49:40+00:00): ok?
artuuurs (2022-01-24 21:35:10+00:00): Hello! Thank you for the improvements. However, you removed piste:type=nordic tag which all the ski maps like openskimap.org, opensnowmap.org, and OsmAnd's Ski plug-in use to identify skiing trails. Please don't remove this tag in the future and if possible add it back here and to any other edits that you may have done. It doesn't hurt to have both highway=path and piste:type=nordic tags at the same time.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-27 17:06:56+00:00): Ciao. Per le relazioni di tipo route bisogna sempre specificarne il tipo nel tag route: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route Rimuovere quindi questo tag è errato. Inoltre, sarebbe meglio specificare pilgrimage=yes, come suggerito sulla wiki invece di valorizzare tale tag con un nome. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115433405
granpasso811 (2021-12-28 07:46:43+00:00): Ciao Andrea, grazie dei suggerimenti. In realtà, mentre sistemavo i segnavia dei sentieri in Liguria, ho notato questa relazione che era composta da un breve tratto in Piemonte ed uno in Liguria completamente scollegati tra loro. Mi pareva generasse confusione tra gli utenti di WaymarkedTrails e ho cambiato il tipo da percorso escursionistico a percorso generico in attesa che venga eventualmente corretta/completata. ciao
eteb3 (2023-07-26 07:52:41+00:00): Hi Strimplers

I'm adding some more details at Porlock Weir and noticed you'd added this saltmarsh.

Can I ask how you determined the SE boundary? 

Now I've visited, I think there's a strong case for continuing it much further SW: you can see the vegetation on aerial. (by the by I think the marina should be smaller: I'll do that anyway.
aceman444 (2021-12-27 20:52:35+00:00): Zdravim, wikidata podla iD editora este OK, ak ste si isty, ze ide o firmu, ktoru navrhuje (niekedy to nie je iste, napr. nejake cinske restauracie Panda). Ale ine navrhy od iD prosim takto hromadne nepreberajte. Velmi casto sa myli, ponuka ci automaticky konvertuje na neschvalene vymyslene znacky a nici data. Dakujem.
Filip009 (2021-12-27 21:08:10+00:00): Snažím sa upravovať len tie prevádzky pri ktorých ponúka wikidata. Upravil som aj niektoré pri ktorých ich neponúkal a navrhoval trocha iné tagy. Páči sa mi, že ten node potom uzamkne a nastaví rovnaké meno a niektoré tagy tak, aby to bolo zjednotené. Keď som našiel duplicitu, tak som ju vymazal. Ale dávam si na to pozor, že čo mi ponúkne. Neviem či ste to už niekedy robil, ale pekne to na ľavej strane zobrazí, že aké tagy odstráni a aké pridá. :)
aceman444 (2021-12-27 21:16:19+00:00): iD sa snazim vyhnut kde mozem, takze mozno som si tuto funkciu nevsimol. Ale podla toho ake skody D sposobuje bud tuto informaciu pouzivatelia nevidia, alebo to nevedia posudit (znackam nerozumeju) a potvrdia cokolvek im iD navrhne (a tvari sa, ze to je 'upgrade'). Ale to len tak vo vseobecnosti. brand:wikidata skodu nenarobi, ak ide o spravnu firmu :)
EneaSuper (2021-12-28 11:56:07+00:00): Ciao, forse si potrebbe modificare ulteriormente facendola diventare una semplice strada di servizio.
IlBano (2021-12-28 12:06:44+00:00): Ciao. L'ho infatti modificata ad highway=service in questo changeset. Intendi qualcos'altro?
Ciao
EneaSuper (2021-12-28 12:46:00+00:00): Effettivamente mi sono accorto ora che l'hai trasformata da strada di servizio ad autostrada.

Ho avuto un caso simile in Val Polcevera per una strada che aveva più o meno lo stesso scopo. Personalmente ritengo che la categoria precedente sia quella più corretta.
IlBano (2021-12-28 15:39:33+00:00): Scusa , ma con la mia modifica la strada è stata impostata proprio ad highway=service (può apparirti ancora su osm.org come motorway per questioni di cache del browser).

Ciao
EneaSuper (2021-12-29 11:58:59+00:00): Uh scusa, hai ragione, colpa del rendering e delle mie sviste!

Allora è tutto apposto, scusa il disturbo 😊
marczoutendijk (2022-01-04 09:47:00+00:00): olk?
marczoutendijk (2022-01-04 09:49:06+00:00): ok?
marczoutendijk (2022-01-04 09:46:35+00:00): K???
marczoutendijk (2022-01-04 09:48:58+00:00): ok?
SomeoneElse (2021-12-27 17:59:24+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9370620925 (which translates as "house") is clearly not a camp site.  Please don’t add personal markers like as data to OpenStreetMap. If you want to add bookmarks in MAPS.ME, please do that.
SomeoneElse (2021-12-27 17:59:42+00:00): مرحبا،
من الواضح أن https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9370620925 (والذي يُترجم كـ "منزل") ليس موقعًا للمخيم. الرجاء عدم إضافة محددات شخصية مثل البيانات إلى OpenStreetMap. إذا كنت ترغب في إضافة إشارات مرجعية في MAPS.ME ، يرجى القيام بذلك.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-01-14 06:35:03+00:00): أستاذ فهد تم حذف مواقعك التي أدخلتها بسبب أنها مواقع خاصة بك وليست عامة وهذه خريطة عامة يستفيد منها الجميع وبالإمكان استخدام ميزة المفضلة في برنامج مابزمي أو أوسماند لحفظ مواقعك الخاصة بدون التأثير على الخريطة العامة
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-27 17:30:03+00:00): Ciao Luca. Questa modifica mi sembra errata building=chapel è una cappella (=piccola chiesa), dove una persona può entrare: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dchapel Dalle dimensioni e da queste foto (https://www.santuariodellabrughiera.it/viacrucis.php) questi edifici non soddisfano questa  definizione. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115436081
Supaplex (2021-12-28 01:21:20+00:00): node 69198108176919810817 用disused?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115436365
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-02-09 18:30:26+00:00): adoro o teu mapeamento, continua!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-01-14 06:35:47+00:00): Thanks
aceman444 (2021-12-27 21:13:24+00:00): Zdravim, nie som si isty spravnostou tychto konverzii.

'was:' a 'disused:' maju odlisny vyznam, nejde o novu a starsiu znacku s rovnakym vyznamom (kedy by konverzia mala zmysel).

Pozrite
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:P%C5%99edpona_%C5%BEivotn%C3%ADho_cyklu
Filip009 (2021-12-27 22:02:18+00:00): Áno, moja chyba. vraciam späť :)
Spush (2022-02-18 18:20:33+00:00): Ez egy zsákutca. A zsákutcák nem szoktak egyirányúak lenni. Biztos jó ez így?
zkeller (2022-02-18 18:37:52+00:00): Köszi hogy jelezted. Nem ez volt a terv a zsákutcát akartam a végére rakni, valahogy a oneway tag lett belőle. Javítva
Spush (2022-02-18 19:55:19+00:00): Köszi.
RosaColacicco (2022-01-02 22:22:15+00:00): Tag modified: track --> unclassified
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115438337
literan (2021-12-29 20:17:10+00:00): не надо это добавлять в название (и ОРАТЬ тоже не надо)
eggie (2021-12-27 18:38:53+00:00): Oke zo.. Die crossing heb ik weer even verwijderd. Editor iD vraagt of je van alles wilt invullen en/of toevoegen , maar dat is niet altijd nodig.
Mocht je de smaak te pakken krijgen kijk dan snel naar de betere editor JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 eggie
Magical_Maarten (2021-12-27 18:48:39+00:00): Ach, had ik er toch weer een crossing ingezet? Niet bij stil gestaan.

Ik zie dat je meteen de wijk onder handen neemt met wat andere verbeteringen! Leuk, hoor!

Ik ga even naar de JOSM editor kijken.

Groeten, Maarten
eggie (2021-12-27 19:35:47+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback : 
De kapper is oke.., Probeer een school op de adresnode te taggen, maar de school staat al geduid op het terrein zelf. Het is dus een keuze maken. Adresnode nr 1 bevincdt zich op het gebouw. De naam kan dan van het terrein af.
landuse=education kun je dan nog aan het terrein toevoegen.
Een social_centre zal een community_centre moeten zijn. een siocial_centre is meer een Engelse Herenclub.
Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Je hebt per abuis adresnode Spoorlaan 15 verplaatst.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-27 19:38:44+00:00): Je edits.. Adres nr 15 weer losgemaakt van gebouwomtrek
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115439134
eggie (2021-12-27 19:40:53+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnoxde bij school
eggie (2021-12-27 19:43:48+00:00): community_centre toegevoegd..  
Voor een bibliotheek is ook een eigen tag. 
Welke operator=... heeft de ATM? 
Kijk je nog even?
user_2066394 (2021-12-27 20:58:31+00:00): https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1009364551
Gut rumgekommen mittlerweile das Tal.
map per (2021-12-28 08:48:21+00:00): Komisch, das sieht ja so aus als hätte ich das Tal entführt, dabei wurde es mir vom Editor in München angezeigt. 
Ich hab das Tal jetzt an der richtigen Stelle neu eingezeichnet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1016078561).
martinst (2021-12-27 19:28:04+00:00): Is the object you have added a hunting stand? If yes it should be tagged according to:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=hunting_stand
llamborda (2021-12-27 21:42:18+00:00): Thank you for the tagging guidelines. Unfortunately there are only few tag I can recall a posteriori. I will add the new tag as a new change set. If the tags added are not enough, please feel free to remove the POI.
literan (2021-12-29 20:15:08+00:00): в теге operator указывается название юрлица, обслуживающего объект.

не "метро", а ГУП "Московский метрополитен"
user_2066394 (2021-12-27 21:29:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dcemetery
"Für Kirchhöfe gibt es ein eigenes Tag amenity=grave_yard.", das hätte für St. Stephanus gepasst, eher landuse rausnehmen?

Konflikt kommt auch noch von der Dopplung durch den Einzelknoten: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1082873163
Silence37 (2021-12-28 15:00:41+00:00): Ok, überrredet. Passt besser.
Den Einzelknoten habe ich nicht bemerkt.
berndw (2021-12-31 09:16:13+00:00): Hallo MarkusGünter

Vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge zu OSM.

Ich habe ein paar Anmerkungen dazu, da nicht alles korrekt zu sein scheint

Die Hausnummer 1 ist laut ALKIS nicht das kommerzielle Gebäude sondern das Wohngebäude, Anbauten haben in der Regel keine Hausnummer.
Was ist der Tätigkeitsbereich von Waschmaschienenrw?
Schau Dir bitte diese Seiten im Wiki an, um das Unternehmen besser zu erfassen
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:shop
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft

Bei Fragen einfach hier antworten

weiterhin viel Spass beim Mappen
Bernd
danieldegroot2 (2021-12-28 12:33:57+00:00): Hey Anne,

I see you tagged a number nodes, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9370874597/history
as bumps. However, some of them are quite long for a bump. I would usually tag this as a "table";
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_calming#By_causing_vertical_deviation
as at this pedestrian crossing;
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2698214222

Regards,

Daniel
jb54osm (2021-12-27 22:13:19+00:00): Sorry. Het plaatsen van een verkeersdrempel leidt blijkbaar tot verwijdering van network:type :-(( .
Danysan95 (2021-12-29 07:14:00+00:00): A cosa serve il secondo tracciato della ferrovia marcato nel nome come WRONG PATH ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015937002 ) quando esiste già un elemento che traccia abbastanza correttamente ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015911451 ) ? Confrontando l'elemento esistente con le mappe ufficiali, incluse quelle nel source:position del nuovo percorso, mi sembra fedele, e può essere comunque migliorato, piuttosto che creare un duplicato
Gior7 (2021-12-29 08:31:46+00:00): Ciao, ho preferito non eliminare subito il "vecchio tracciato" per sicurezza e per evitare errori nel disegno del nuovo tracciato.
Se hai verificato che il nuovo tracciato è corretto, puoi liberamente procedere ad eliminare il "WRONG PATH".
Buona giornata
Danysan95 (2021-12-30 21:05:25+00:00): Credo che mantenere due elementi nel caso uno sia sbagliato non sia una opzione. Bisogna che capiamo qual è il tracciato corretto fra i due (o quantomeno quello più probabile e poi lo marchiamo con fixme=position). 

Per il percorso io sono a conoscenza di queste fonti:
- http://via.regione.piemonte.it/torinolione/0-%20Presentaz_Progetto/presentazione%20LTF%20in%20CdS%2028maggio2013.pdf pag. 23
- http://www.telt-sas.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/3_PROJECT.pdf pag. 8
- http://via.regione.piemonte.it/torinolione/Integrazioni_del_13_06_2014/PROGETTO_DEFINITIVO/VIA_6/PD2_C2B_2085_30-15-94_20-01_Corografia%20di%20tracciato%20tav%201_A.pdf
- http://via.regione.piemonte.it/torinolione/Integrazioni_del_13_06_2014/PROGETTO_DEFINITIVO/VIA_6/PD2_C2B_2086_30-15-94_20-02_Corografia%20di%20tracciato%20tav%202_A.pdf

In base a queste fonti mi sembra che fino a Susa il percorso corretto sia quello senza "WRONG PATH" ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015911451 ), quindi direi di eliminare quello con "WRONG PATH" ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015937002 ).

Passato Susa, in direzione Bussoleno, mi sembra che le modifiche fatte in questo changeset siano corrette, con la biforcazione vicino a Coldimosso che mi pare abbia il percorso corretto, quindi direi di lasciarle così.

Infine bisogna ripristinare le modifiche alla relazione della linea ferroviaria ( 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6927937 ), ri-aggiungendo gli elementi del percorso corretti.
Danysan95 (2021-12-30 21:48:28+00:00): Ho fatto in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115584045 le modifiche descritte sopra
HellMap (2023-09-14 12:21:09+00:00): Čau!

Gribēju precizēt, vai tu esi pārliecināts, ka https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015941583 ir tilts nevis culvert "upei"? Pēc Mapillary un ortofoto neizskatās pēc tilta.
Colbertson (2023-09-16 06:28:11+00:00): Drīzāk ka culvert, jā. Izlaboju.
WoodWoseWulf (2022-01-03 00:38:30+00:00): Hi, you have https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1015938282 marked as a building... looks like some kind of road?
mueschel (2021-12-28 11:06:30+00:00): Hi,
could you check the destination tags you used here? There are two slight mistakes in the keys:
Different languages are tagged as ":lang:sv" - unlike name:sv. This is needed to prevent ambiguities with other subkeys like "destination:to"
- ":backward" is the last part of the key.

I.e. it should be:
destination:lang:sv:backward

In general, the order is:
destination
[:hgv|:bicycle|...]
[:ref|:lang:XX|...]
[:lanes]
[:forward|:backward]
SekeRob (2021-12-28 08:01:24+00:00): This is about the 4th repair on this monster 1520 member forest in a few weeks. It keeps disappearing from the > 1km zoom view and being flagged in OSM Inspector. In 2km and less zoom nobody sees as that does not get re-rendered other then every month or so, low frequency. Anyway, you were about an hour ahead of me arriving to address the break, even before the 12 hourly Inspector update flagged it last night.

cheers.
tyr_asd (2021-12-28 18:17:28+00:00): yeah, this one really should be split into significantly smaller chunks. For a start, I shaved this part off: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13607045
SekeRob (2021-12-28 22:01:32+00:00): Cool and the seeming ease, with skill, this being done so quick in JOSM. In ID Editor you'd spend a day and breaking of 125 members.

ciao
tyr_asd (2022-01-13 11:48:28+00:00): honestly, it was quite hard to do with JOSM as well: a) it requires a detailed knowledge of the "multipolygon" data structure, and b) rearranging the multipolygon relation members is a tedious process with such large polygons, especially at the locations where inner members become outer borders of the result(s).

It would be really nice to have a proper tool which allows to automatically split any polygon in OSM with ease. Ssomething like what [JOSM's utilsplugin2 Alt+X](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/utilsplugin2#Split_area_.28Alt.2BX.29), but also works for multipolygons would be my dream ^^.
SekeRob (2022-01-13 14:01:17+00:00): If 1520 is a monster, imagine the word for one of almost 4500 members i mistakenly touched this week and the problem i then got co-tagged for. Took 3 sessions. OSMI could not identify them all in one so it took 3 cycles to clean it up before the area was without any new alerts, so i'm fine now. The person was mapping inside areas and then wrapping the outer forest line all the way around resulting in duplicate segments and 'more than 1 ring'. Dropped mapper a note, an ID user, zero response and the next day, you can guess, repeat.

Anyway, the hands-on repetition does make it a much more speedy effort now. 

Cheers
ivanbranco (2021-12-27 21:25:51+00:00): Ciao Atom,

name=Monumento alla Resistenza e alla Libertà [Franco Fossa]

io farei:
name=Monumento alla Resistenza e alla Libertà
artist_name=Franco Fossa

inoltre userei historic=memorial piuttosto di historic=monument, quest'ultimo non si usa per taggare i monumenti ma i memoriali di dimensioni "monumentali", cioè in cui puoi entrare dentro o camminarci sopra, come l'Arco di Trionfo per esempio.

Per favore utilizza commenti ai changeset che descrivano ciò che hai fatto, qua ad esempio avresti potuto scrivere "Modificato nome monumento", vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115443259
JJIglesias (2021-12-27 22:42:11+00:00): El Mapa NO es un CATASTRO, colocar comunidades o Parcelas SIN QUE EXISTAN tales comunidades o Parcelas delimitadas. NO ES ACEPTABLE. Y puede ser sujeto a que tal data sea Borrada del Mapa. El mapa se hace con elementos EXISTENTES y no elementos planeados. No existe catalogada una Comunidad Daniel Serrano, y no aparecen registros de tal Village. Puedes justificar lo q estas colocando en el Mapa?
Gracias
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SafetyIng (2021-12-28 16:25:26+00:00): Hey, 
dein Changeset ist ziemlich groß (Fläche) vielleicht wäre es auch sinnvoll es einfach in mehrere Kleine aufzuteilen?
OptikalCrow (2022-03-24 00:17:00+00:00): National parks are not tagged as leisure=park. Take a look at some of the other national parks in the US for examples of tagging

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dnational_park
highflyer74 (2021-12-31 13:46:22+00:00): Moin!

Zwei Anmerkungen habe ich hier:

- Du verwendest teilweise Tags, die es so nicht in OSM gibt. Beispielsweise amenity=grassland. Es ist sehr wichtig, dass das Tagging von Objekten richtig gemacht wird, damit die Daten nutzbar sind.

- Du gibst als Datenquelle "Bayrische Vermessungsverwaltung" an. Liegt von deren Seite als Eigentümer der Daten eine Erlaubnis zur Nutzung derselben vor? Wenn ja, wo kann ich das nachlesen?

Viele Grüße und einen guten Rutsch!
Paradine (2022-01-02 14:28:23+00:00): Moin,

amenity=grassland war wohl ein copy&pasteFehler mit JOSM.
Generell halte ich mich an die richtigen Tags.

Das Bundesland Bayern hat die Nutzung freigegeben:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Bayern
highflyer74 (2022-01-02 21:22:19+00:00): Super, danke Dir!
user_5359 (2021-12-28 17:30:13+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400462936/history. I assume a copy & paste error!
santamariense (2021-12-29 01:07:00+00:00): ace:nameccess pode ser tranquilamente trocado por source:name pois é a fonte do nome colocado na rua, mais especificamente, a lei que a denomina. http://www.camaramairinque.sp.gov.br/Arquivos/ArquivosDocumentos/225152003.pdf
Marcus Salles (2021-12-31 13:26:38+00:00): Bom dia.
Trata-se de falha de digitação.
Corrigido.
eggie (2021-12-28 06:28:13+00:00): Herzlich Willkommen bei OSM,

... foot=yes ist schon 'default' auf einem Fussweg. 
access=no ist fasst immer falsch. Es meint Zugang Verboten.  

Grüss Eggie..
eggie (2021-12-28 07:07:05+00:00): access=no removed... foot=yes removed (default)
Added layer=1 to bridges
eggie (2021-12-28 06:33:02+00:00): warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway

Dein Fussweg hat  sich mit einem Radweg und der Landuse verklebt.
Duplicated ways. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115444920

Gr  eggie
eggie (2021-12-28 06:37:55+00:00): Sie haben vom einer Grenze (Multiplygoon)  ein Fussweg gemacht. Das kan nicht stimmen.. Solch ein Fussweg muss separat hinzugefügt werden. 
eggie
eggie (2021-12-28 06:42:54+00:00): Reverted by changeset #115454719.

due adding footway at multipolygon boundery protected area Waterleidingduinen. 
If you have any questions you are welcome.
eggie
eggie (2021-12-28 07:46:07+00:00): Here an uptodate picture of the area
https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=28-12-2020&loc=51.40057%2C3.508866%2C16z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2021-11-21&acqid=20211121_112430_SV1-04&sensor=SuperView-1
olehz (2022-01-13 01:50:46+00:00): Ти розумієш, що своїми правками в електромережі, ти лише гірше робиш? Ти просто нереального трешу наробив, я вже замахався за тобою правити, почитай вікі перед тим як редагувати речі в яких не тямиш. Високовольтна мережа була майже ідеальна, поки не приходять і не починають імпрувати: https://nadoloni.com

А мінорні лінії твої, я взагалі, казав би видалити. Я сильно сумніваюсь, що їх реально нанести по супутнику, там одна твоя фантазія і засерання мапи сміттям. Сорян
olehz (2022-01-13 02:00:56+00:00): в Україні усі, підкреслюю, УСІ! ПС уніфіковані. та й не тільки в Україні. не треба вигадувати свої правила і ламати стандарт. якщо по твому високовольтна ПС це "minor_distribution", то що таке ТП?

відфільтрувати різню дрібну інфраструктуру можна лише по площі (працює не завжди) і по тегу minor_distribution, тому будь ласка