piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2020-01-16 13:04:11+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Dimacn (2020-01-21 10:46:53+00:00): Пожалуйста, перед редактированием и добавлением дорог изучите классификацию дорог - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway  Это очень важный тег. Нужно знать правильные значения тега highway для разных типов дорог.
mavl (2020-02-02 11:19:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80431948 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3428].
mavl (2020-02-02 11:19:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 80431948 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3428].
eggie (2020-01-16 14:12:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review
Je hebt het cafe nu 2x getgad. 1x op de adresnode... dat is correct. Alles wat je hebt bijgetagd op het gebouw zelf "moet' er weer af.. ook het adres. We gebruiken alleen de adresnodes. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-16 20:46:11+00:00): Kadaster gegevens verwijderd.. duplikaatinfo van gebouw gehaald.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-01-17 08:43:59+00:00): typo.. Kadastergegevens hersteld.
eggie (2020-01-16 14:22:07+00:00): Dag dweep. 
Goed dat je zaken aanpast, maar heb je rekening gehouden met de fietsroute en de busroutes?
De routering lijkt me niet meer te werken hier.
Je edits  http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=79653406

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-16 14:28:53+00:00): Iets routeert alleen maar goed als de tagging op de wegen klopt. Het is niet zo dat als je lijnen trekt dat dat goed gaat in gps en routeplanner. Zo simpel is het helaas niet.
We kennen routes..  Die zijn nu onderbroken.. We kennen ook eenrichting. Die ontbreekt hier ook. 
Ik zal proberen iets te herstellen. 
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-16 14:31:54+00:00): Hoe gaat de fietsroute???  Het fietspad (met fietsroute)  ging voorheen via de rotonde naar de Voorweg. Nu eindigt de route tot ergens langs de Verbindingsweg. Kun je nog oversteken waar de rotonde was?
eggie (2020-01-16 14:41:24+00:00): Hoe sluit de noordelijke Voorweg nu aan op de Verbindingsweg. Die aansluiting is nu toch ook anders?
eggie (2020-01-16 15:17:19+00:00): Dweep.. Ik heb diverse fietsroutes en busroutes hersteld. Ook de routering op somige plaatsen voor de richting van de weg goed te zetten en oneway=yes toe te voegen. 
Vraag evt.hulp als je zoiets ingewikkelds wilt aanpakken aan andere mappers of op het forum van OSM.
Achter de tagging gaat een hele verborgen wereld schuil die je alleen doorgrond door je in de routerelaties te verdiepen. Wanneer je geen ervaring hebt is zoiets lastig om dat je er geen weet van hebt. 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Nog een vraag.... EWaarom heb je het noordelijke fietspad op slot gezet voor fietsers? 
MVG,
Eggie
Wulf4096 (2020-01-16 19:27:56+00:00): Hiho,
"routut" sieht nach typo aus.
look4book (2020-01-18 14:52:46+00:00): oha - da könntest Du recht haben. Danke!
MapTheWalk (2020-01-16 15:26:01+00:00): Hi, something is wrong with the parking aisle ways around Blocks 488-490, can you review the modifications made in this changeset and revert any errors?
Ways 100765431 and 645284266.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 01:44:23+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 10595520 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 01:47:14+00:00): Olá,

ver também a resgtrição 10595521
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 01:47:21+00:00): Olá,

ver também a resgtrição 10595522
eggie (2020-01-16 14:26:05+00:00): Geef concreet aan wat je doet. Enige schoonheidsaanpassing zegt niets.
Je vraagt om een review
Je hebt de wegen gedeeltelijk van construction gehaald. Kennelijk zijn ze open gesteld.Is dat zo hier?

 Toch staat construction=unclassified (de specificatie die de weg hoort te krijgen)  nog steeds als regel in je tagging.
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-16 23:03:20+00:00): De ontsluitingsweg (Voorweg)  heb ik op tertiar laten staan. De noordkant heb ik wer op unclassified gezet. 
De construction=unclassified heb ik verwijderd.
klnkengi (2021-01-09 22:37:06+00:00): Hi, are you certain that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/137043146 is oneway?
OttoR (2021-01-09 22:56:22+00:00): Clearly this is a mistake from splitting the one way sections. 

I have corrected this now; but since it was an edit from 12 months ago. It would have been perfectly fine for you to correct this instead.

Thanks for the review :-)
Takogin (2020-01-22 13:58:16+00:00): Привет! Вы добавили большое количество домов в своих пакетах правок за последнее время - это отлично, но, пожалуйста, не прописывайте в имени номер дома, для этого есть специальный тег `addr:housenumber`, который вы и так используете.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79654433
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 01:48:49+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 10595557 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 01:50:52+00:00): Olá,

ver também restrição 10595558
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-05 01:52:05+00:00): Olá,

ver também restrição 10595560
EinKonstanzer (2020-01-16 17:31:45+00:00): Das kann so nicht stimmen... Dieser Ort/Gebäude ist nicht der Niederkassler Lohweg!
marczoutendijk (2020-01-24 19:59:55+00:00): Rue du Comte Palatin was dragged to the wrong position.
Fixed it.
Farma 47 (2020-01-16 16:54:39+00:00): pogrešno odredjeno mesto kampa
atomwaffen (2020-01-16 15:07:40+00:00): Is there an issue with your editor? "clacks_overhead" is a private tag with has no meaning outside a small subculture.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2020-01-16 15:14:46+00:00): There is nothing wrong with my editor. I have made an extension to do this

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%E1%9A%9B%E1%9A%8F%E1%9A%92%E1%9A%90%E1%9A%94%E1%9A%8F%E1%9A%94%E1%9A%8B%E1%9A%9C%20%F0%9F%8F%B3%EF%B8%8F%E2%80%8D%F0%9F%8C%88/diary/42551
cehceh (2020-06-10 15:53:14+00:00): Hallo Armin,
bist Du sicher?
Ich war noch nicht dort, aber nach meinem Klefü ist es vom Ausgangspunkt beim Col d'Arpettaz ein sehr langer Zugangsweg (6h) und der versicherte Steig im Vergleich nur relativ kurz.
VG, Matthias
Arminus (2020-06-10 16:01:30+00:00): Hallo Matthias,
ich versteh meine Änderung gerade selbst nicht :-( Vom Schreibtisch aus gesehen macht der Weg vor dem Sattel auf 2053m als Ferrata keinen Sinn? Vielleicht hatte ich nur die Richtung der Wege in der Relation gedreht?

Wie dem auch sei, mea culpa, korrigier bitte so wie Du's für Richtig findest.

VG, Armin
viloan (2020-01-16 14:47:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2020-06-18 12:56:44+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
camelCaseNick (2020-01-25 23:41:58+00:00): Hallo,
der hier verlinkte Wikipedia-Artikel an der Straße hat keine Sprachangabe nach dem Schema wikipedia=[lang]:[article]. Außerdem sollte an einer Straße der Wikipedia-Artikel dieser Straße sein, sowie an einer Brücke der Artikel zur Brücke.
Da Straßenabschnitt und Brücke getrennt hier sind, sollte der Artikel – wie er bereits ist – auch eig. nur an die Brücke.
CamelCaseNick
h_i_ (2020-01-27 14:21:19+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe nur die einen Fehler beheben wollen und da sind mir wohl die Flüchtigkeitsfehler unterlaufen. Du darfst das gerne überarbeiten.
camelCaseNick (2020-01-28 19:30:56+00:00): Okay, habe das in CS #80216801 gemacht.
h_i_ (2020-01-29 16:00:03+00:00): Danke
Mike Raust (2020-09-08 20:18:13+00:00): Please don't slavishly follow iD's autovalidator, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Controversial_Decisions for details
Adam Martin (2020-09-08 21:58:07+00:00): Oh yes.  I make sure to try and keep an eye on them.  Some seem odd and I leaned my lesson about corrections a good time ago.  Thanks for that page though - very interesting 

Thanks!

Adam
dcapillae_buildings-import (2020-01-16 15:34:51+00:00): This changeset should have been uploaded by the user account dcapillae_buildings-import (my mistake).
dcapillae_buildings-import (2020-01-16 15:34:34+00:00): This changeset should have been uploaded by the user account dcapillae_buildings-import (my mistake).
Leo Slager (2020-01-18 11:40:32+00:00): Dat je illegaal door de berm van de N194 kunt lopen lijkt mij redelijk voor de hand liggend. Maar dat is gewoon strafbaar en kan/moet dus niet worden vastgelegd in OSM. Ik verwijder je bijdrage.
d-v-b (2021-07-16 19:29:02+00:00): Номера автобусных маршрутов 101 и 107 перепутаны. Чуть не приехал не туда. ;)
sergeybe (2021-07-16 19:57:49+00:00): Извините. Не специально. Ошибся малость :( Надеюсь, что добрались куда хотели.
d-v-b (2021-08-07 14:46:33+00:00): Бывает. Всё нормально, вовремя сошёл с автобуса и пересел.
whb (2020-01-16 21:24:37+00:00): Änderungssatz rückgängig gemacht.
Bitte keine nicht existierenden Wege und Straßen eintragen.
Danke!
gabro00 (2020-01-16 16:55:48+00:00): Szia!
Ha az úton van behajtási korlátozás, most pl. psv=yes, akkor nem kell plusz korlátozás kapcsolat is, csak nehezíti a szerkesztést.
gabro00 (2020-01-16 17:18:40+00:00): Javítottam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79659527
abrensch (2020-01-19 08:50:46+00:00): Hallo Recoil16,

für die B 237 war das aber jetzt keine Verbesserung:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11133364

Gruss, Arndt
Recoil16 (2020-01-19 10:18:54+00:00): Hallo Arndt, 
vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Irgendwas muss da schief gelaufen sein, die nodes der B 237 waren ja auch noch auf der Straße. Habe es korrigiert.
Gruß, Moritz
user_5359 (2020-01-16 18:52:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. 

I have revert your change set.
StephaneP (2020-01-21 15:57:07+00:00): Bonjour Antoine,
Merci pour les ajouts de chemins "doux" dans la zone d'activités de Vémars. Je me suis permis de corriger les "footway" en "path" pour indiquer le côté "générique" de ces voies qui peuvent être empruntées par les piétons et les cyclistes.
exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/472352401/history

Bonne continuation
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
osmviborg (2020-01-16 16:25:14+00:00): Undlad venligst at erstatte korrekte data (polygoner) med egne nye. Du sletter valide tag's når du praktiserer denne metode.
Vincent de Phily (2020-06-29 12:59:15+00:00): Hi !

Is there a reason for the non-metric units for height and width ? JOSM validator complains about that. I could do the conversion, unless maybe benchmark types are named colloquially after their size in inches ?
b-unicycling (2020-06-29 15:49:46+00:00): No, there isn't, I was just trying to adapt to what people seem to use locally. I'm all in favour of the metric system, but I have yet to meet someone here who uses it.
Vincent de Phily (2020-06-29 17:20:45+00:00): I use metric. Nice to meet you ;p I guess people interested in historical features like benchmarks are more likely to still think in imperial units.

But OSM as a database defaults to metric; conversion to old units can be done on the fly if needed. I'd say in an OSM context there are very few reasons to use non-metric, the only one I'm aware of in Ireland are old signposts, which should be vanishingly rare nowadays.
b-unicycling (2020-06-29 17:31:09+00:00): Vincent, it's me, Anne, we met before. :D
I'll keep it in mind and switch to metric from now on.
eggie (2022-08-01 17:04:41+00:00): Nog geen welkomstmail onvangen zie ik. Bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2020-01-16 18:41:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your entry is a duplicate to https://www.osm.org/way/591847105
Andrea Musuruane (2020-01-19 18:34:14+00:00): Ciao. Come mai hai cambiato da place=village a place=city? place=city serve per indicare il più grande tipo di insediamento urbano. Ciao, Andrea
Daniele Carrucciu (2020-01-20 08:47:54+00:00): Ciao,
mi sono reso conto soltanto venerdì che Borgaretto non ha un codice ISTAT e mi sono  poi dimenticato di correggere l'errore, quindi ti ringrazio per averlo fatto al posto mio (ho chiesto una review delle mie modifiche perché avevo già qualche dubbio quando ho implementato tale modifica).

Grazie ancora e buon lavoro,
Danele C.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-01-20 08:54:10+00:00): Ciao, anche avesse avuto un codice ISTAT, non cambiava niente. Il tag place viene usato per indicare il tipo di insediamento urbano. Qui trovi un post in merito: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-January/041735.html Ciao, Andrea
Daniele Carrucciu (2020-01-20 10:12:44+00:00): Ok, grazie delle info.

A presto,
Daniele C.
hu9o (2020-01-16 19:36:23+00:00): Super ! Merci
eggie (2020-01-16 20:26:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-01-16 20:30:44+00:00): Je vraagt om een review.. TIP..Om de Historie te bewaren kun je het beste de bestaande weg bewerken en niet eerst verwijderen. 
Verder kun je niet doorgaande binnenstraten met bewoning gerust omtaggen naar highway=residential
MVG,
Eggie
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-02 00:39:37+00:00): Why did you delete the landuse=orchard w66449889 ? I do see orchard in the aerial imagery, it just needs to be refined a bit. 
 
Restored, refined.
pangoSE (2020-01-19 14:37:47+00:00): Hi, could you please avoid continentspanning changesets? See https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/79577457
InsertUser (2020-01-16 20:06:17+00:00): Changeset comment does not compute.
yellow_car47 (2020-01-16 23:50:06+00:00): Hello InsertUser,

	Thank you for bringing this to my attention. To clarify, the changes that I made were done within New Providence Island and not Freeport. I hope this clears up some of the confusion.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-02 00:23:57+00:00): Sorry I cannot understand these changes. 
You delete 2 large Corine landuses (farmland, meadow) w/o refining them. 
You delete a residential landuse from Corine,
you create a better one, and tag that again as source=corine 2006 ?
s8evq (2020-01-22 21:18:32+00:00): Zou de name= ook aangepast mogen worden naar was:name=, of laat je dit zo met een specifieke reden?
L'imaginaire (2020-01-22 21:31:56+00:00): Hmm, goeie vraag. Niet zo gelaten om een specifieke reden alleszins.
eggie (2020-01-16 20:34:05+00:00): Oke,... maar...
Ook hier.. niet eerst verwijderen maar aanpassen.
Gr eggie
user_5359 (2020-01-16 21:10:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/358830662#map=18 over 100 meters, Please double check the situation.
Plymouths (2020-01-16 21:13:04+00:00): Thanks. The previous version of this was counting the public park and the community garden as being part of the school grounds. They are not.
eggie (2020-01-16 20:37:50+00:00): Niet te veel naar de rendering van de namen kijken in de standaardkaart en dan straten gaan splitsen. 
Elke kaart is weer anders. 
Ik heb weer wat aangepast en de splits op een logische plaats gezet. 
Veel plezier met mappen,
Eggie
karson_ (2021-07-25 13:53:17+00:00): Accepting the default solution that iD provides is a very bad way of fixing warnings. I noticed quite a few bridges in the area that you added where they did not represent the actual span. iD just makes a very short span no matter what. Same thing goes with tunnels.
mueschel (2020-01-17 08:15:18+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
Could you explain what the tags you added here mean?

communauté de commune	
communauté de communes
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps. Please have a look to the Wiki and read about common tags used on administrative boundaries.

Jan
viloan (2020-01-16 18:39:56+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Verdy_p (2020-01-16 19:11:38+00:00): Do you read the "note" tags? There was absolutely NO duplicate. There are TWO parts for this comarca, over two provinces, not just one;
And the tags were clearly different (not the same boundary=* value for parts)
DGerveno (2020-01-16 19:20:16+00:00): En primer lugar, sí estaban duplicadas. Ya existía una comarca que agrupaba todos los municipios que la componen, de hecho para editar las suyas usted ha tenido que inventarse un nombre "Hoya de Huesca(Zaragoza)" que no existe en la realidad. Y en segundo lugar, las comarcas son una entidad supeditada a la autonomía de Aragón, pero por encima del municipio, al margen de las provincias, por lo que la división que usted propone no es real. Por si fuera poco, está usted haciendo cambios del mismo tipo por toda España, sin tener los conocimientos adecuados, como bien me ha demostrado, y lo que es más grave, sin estar de acuerdo con la comunidad local de editores, que es muy activa. Por favor, no insista en esta actitud, estoy tratando de ser amable con usted y explicarle el error que ha cometido. Un saludo.
sanchi (2020-01-16 19:26:42+00:00): Verdy_p como te están comentando estas haciendo una duplicación de información. Estas convirtiendo 1 comarca en 3. Es una comarca no 3. 
Estas haciendo cambio de limites administrativos sin tener los conocimientos necesarios de cómo funcionan en España y ya se te ha dicho que lo hables con la comunidad local. En general las comarcas no están reconocidas en la mayoría de los casos. En vez de ello haces oídos sordos y sigues editando sin tener en cuenta lo que dice la comunidad. 
Lo siento pero no es una manera correcta de actuar. Te pido que recapacites y dialogues con la comunidad para poder solucionar estos errores.

Un saludo.
Verdy_p (2020-01-16 19:26:43+00:00): Once again I've NOT created ANY duplicate, They were just the two parts one in each province with its relevant municipalties for each part. You've reverted abusively many more things that should have been kept, without looking at precisely. ALL was correct !
Verdy_p (2020-01-16 19:27:39+00:00): And this did NOT create 3 comarcas; but kept 1 comarca and 2 fragments of comarcas.
DGerveno (2020-01-16 19:34:21+00:00): Usted ha mantenido la comarca que existía, y ha creado dos fragmentos con el mismo nombre, lo que es claramente un duplicado. Por si fuera poco, no es necesario en absoluto crear dichos fragmentos, ya que las comarcas son una entidad independiente de las provincias. Si hace un cambio de tal entidad con errores se arriesga a que sea revertido con argumentos, como los que yo (y otros compañeros de la comunidad española, me consta) le estoy ofreciendo. Por favor, no insista, y no me falte más el respeto escribiéndome en mayúsculas. Un saludo.
Syl (2020-02-13 11:03:20+00:00): Bonjour, il y a maintenant deux mairies, laquelle est la bonne ?
Vin212 (2020-02-13 11:50:26+00:00): Il y officiellement qu'une mairie c'est celle que j'ai ajouter. Je n'ai juste pas réussi à supprimer l ancienne et j ai oublier de le mentionner
Syl (2020-02-13 12:57:03+00:00): C'est corrigé, merci.