piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
frosm (2019-08-13 22:46:05+00:00): bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686836844
il y a un soucis pour l'attribu du pont : il ne se met que sur la partie du rail qui passe au dessus de l'autre partie du rail et non sur l'ensemble
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-30 15:08:46+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
dval (2019-10-15 11:48:36+00:00): Вверху слева вы обозначили ЖЗ, но дороги в ней service. Скорее всего, это не СНТ, а реально жилая зона, поэтому дороги лучше обозначить resid. И не забыть соединить их с остальной сетью дорог дорогой unclass., иначе возникнет изолят.
user_3716049 (2019-05-03 11:23:59+00:00): Hallo tux,
Toni hat mir mitgeteilt das die Linie 006 die Du vor kurzen bearbeitet hast teilweise gelöscht wurde.  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69768030#map=14/51.1381/6.4765&layers=N

Könnt  ihr mal klären wer dafür verantwortlich ist und die Löschung rückgängig machen. 

Gruß Kelso
tux67 (2019-05-03 11:41:53+00:00): Hi,

habe bereits in den CS geantwortet, das Toni kommentiert hat.
Wie du hier in der History sehen kannst:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/170439/history
War die Relation bei Version 183 leer.
Die 006 ist jetzt wieder da.
Der Konfliktlöser in JOSM hilft leider nur, kann aber nicht entscheiden, welche Version richtig und welche falsch ist.
Gruß
tux67
eggie (2019-04-30 10:38:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

footway=sidewalk  hoort eigenlijk niet op een voetpad, Dat kan er weer af. 
Het is een BUG die gratis meekomt met de presets in editor iD.
access=private zal routeren niet meer toestaan, maar wellicht is dit ook de werkelijke situatie.
MVG,
Eggie
Leo Slager (2019-05-02 00:00:42+00:00): access=private is hier niet van toepassing.
Dat mag er weer af.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-30 15:08:42+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
iWowik (2019-05-01 05:38:00+00:00): День добрый!
Придерживайтесь, пожалуйста, соглашения о наименовании
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/686696560/history
Silva1989 (2019-07-17 01:12:32+00:00): Obrigado
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-05-12 09:49:14+00:00): Reverted, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70155615
99point99 (2019-04-30 11:15:48+00:00): Precise location is -41.018217, 175.362283 - how to numerically edit location?
ralley (2019-05-03 21:06:11+00:00): If you use JOSM (+ utilsplugin2) you can add node (Shift+D) to add a node from co-ordinates.  Then select the newly added node and your existing node and replace geometry (Ctrl+Shift+G) to update your existing node to the new coordinates
cafeconleche (2019-05-01 20:14:54+00:00): Hi, you removed the city tags from that tree, but I think you should have moved those tags to a separate node instead, because it seems that information was lost and the relations afected by this changeset now don't have an "admin_centre".
Nikola K (2019-05-01 20:19:46+00:00): Hi, yeah, I think you're right, I didn't think that through. Are you able to revert the changes I made and fix the problem? I'm not sure how to do that. I would really appreciate it, thanks.
cafeconleche (2019-05-01 20:28:55+00:00): Ok, I will fix it then. Thanks for answering.
Shinigami (2019-05-27 13:32:03+00:00): Hi! 
Could you please look at pairs of relations 7557974 x 6427907, 7557976 x 349047, it looks duplicated and a little broken. Thanx!;)
sanchi (2019-05-27 16:29:31+00:00): solved in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70667686
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70667832

Thanks for notifying
lmagreault (2019-04-30 13:02:46+00:00): Bonjour,
Le bassin de rétention d'eau près du rond-point est plutôt un landuse=bassin qu'un water=reservoir non ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69730015
Tom360 (2019-04-30 17:43:06+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai sélectionné "bassin de retenue"
et si je modifie en landuse la désignation passe en "eau".
lmagreault (2019-05-02 08:52:00+00:00): D'après le wiki, landuse=basin semble mieux correspondre pour les réservoirs artificiels https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse=basin
Tom360 (2019-05-02 20:30:55+00:00): C'est modifié, merci pour ces conseils.
Bytemark (2019-08-07 13:37:40+00:00): This is wrong and besides this you should not try mechanical edits.
dval (2019-08-16 16:50:31+00:00): Есть много случаев контуров без тегов. Перед выгрузкой новых объектов запускайте валидотор ошибок JOSM.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-30 15:08:37+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
Mauro Morello (2021-03-10 12:03:31+00:00): Hi; I'm from Borgomanero, Piedmont and I'm interested in this place. Do you have some other information or documents about "sas dla rana"? Thanks a lot
Mauro
kapazao (2019-04-30 13:27:28+00:00): Hola, ¿por qué has cambiado la categoría de la carretera N-432a a primary?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a/Normalizaci%C3%B3n#Carretera_nacional_o_auton.C3.B3mica_de_1er_orden_.28trunk.29
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69732015
Alfonso RG (2019-05-02 11:53:13+00:00): Hola, la cambié porque, con la construcción de la variante (actual N-432) la N-432a ha perdido su función de vía principal de largo recorrido, quedando relegada a vía de acceso local, aunque oficialmente no haya sido transferido desde el Ministerio de Fomento. Ocurre en numerosos antiguos trazados que quedan desfasados por variantes. Aun así, si te parece que es más correcto catalogarla de trunk, hazlo sin problemas ;)
Nunca he tenido muy claro si la catalogación de OSM corresponde a funcionalidad o a titularidad. En mi opinión, es más ilustrativa la primera opción.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69732015
eggie (2019-04-30 14:22:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
freeExec (2019-04-30 13:01:24+00:00): Очень не аккуратная геометрия зданий.
redhood2003 (2019-04-30 13:07:25+00:00): good job dog
aquarix (2019-05-01 22:11:07+00:00): Hello Lolsquid, could you please divide your changesets into smaller pieces in the future to group it at maximum one country per changeset? This would be nice. 
This changeset here touches 4 out of 7 continents and notifies many people that are actually not affected.
Regards aquarix
Minh Nguyen (2019-07-10 14:35:55+00:00): Undeleted the Anderson Township boundary in changeset 72098204.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/69732445
tudacs (2019-05-10 12:43:42+00:00): Hallo lempinet,

du hast Wege parallel zu einigen vorhandenen Wegen erstellt -- gibt es dafür einen Grund?

Meines Erachtens nach hätte der Wanderweg "Ostparkweg" als Relation mit den vorhandenen Wegen getaggt werden müssen.

In der derzeitigen Version gibt es eigentlich nur Probleme mit den Daten.

Könntest du dich zeitnah zu den Beweggründen äußern? Ansonsten veranlasse ich gegen Anfang kommender Woche einen Revert deines Changesets.

Beste Grüße
t
tudacs (2019-05-10 12:55:28+00:00): (now also in english, sorry for commenting only in german :) )

Hi lempinet,

you have added paths in parallel to already existent paths or even overlaying them -- is there a good reason for that?

In my humble opinion the hiking path "Ostparkweg" should have been created as a relation with the existing paths.

In the current version (with your changeset) I only see problems for the map.

Could you please comment on these issues rather quickly? I'd go for a revert beginning of next week, if not getting any response.

Thanks for your understanding and best regards
t
lempinet (2019-05-10 14:40:00+00:00): Hey, if there is a better way to add the hiking path please go ahead and change it, I didn’t know how to input it differently. Viele Grüße, Kristof
tudacs (2019-05-11 07:11:50+00:00): I have now reverted this changeset (see changeset 70130705) as well as the others you did yesterday evening. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation for a feature of openstreetmap, which is exactly designed for representing hiking trails consisting of existing paths, like the one you wanted to add. If you have questions don't hesitate to visit and ask in the forum(s), http://forum.openstreetmap.org . The map and its contributors appreciate all work done to the map -- but it should be compliant to the rules and consistent with existing data :).
lempinet (2019-05-11 11:53:30+00:00): Ok, I started a new one, now with relation to existing streets, just Marktbrunnen to Kirchstr. for now, maybe you can have a look. If that is the correct way I will add the rest.
Dimacn (2019-04-30 13:24:09+00:00): Пожалуйста не используйте описательные названия объектам. В name пишем только официальное название. Подробнее - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  Пожалуйста исправьте.
kartonage (2019-04-30 16:22:21+00:00): Hallo Cornacap,

in der Beschreibung der Barnimer Feldmark-Tour (http://www.barnimerland.de/de/radfahren/radtouren/artikel-barnimer-feldmark-tour.html) steht, dass die Strecke nicht ausgeschildert ist. Stimmt das noch oder gibt es mittlerweile eine Beschilderung?

Wenn ja, fehlt jede Nachvollziehbarkeit für die Strecke vor Ort. Nur ausgeschilderte Routen sind daher einzutragen.

Schöne Grüße
Constable (2019-04-30 14:26:33+00:00): Hi, same here, this is just vandalism. I'm reverting this edit
marczoutendijk (2019-07-24 17:45:46+00:00): Hi napo,
You have used a very weird value for landuse!
Did you mean to use:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dreligious
Marc.
Gh0stz0x (2019-07-25 11:41:37+00:00): I agree with you, Marc.  🤔
napo (2019-07-25 12:39:08+00:00): You are right.
Anyway the mistake of the landuse isn't mine.
Look the history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84309625/history
The user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Orlandi_IT_EmiliaRomagna introduced the bad attribute.

My goal was to remove also the landuse and use only the tag barrier.

I think you can fix it.
Gh0stz0x (2019-07-25 13:17:10+00:00): quite right! 😁
marczoutendijk (2019-07-25 14:02:52+00:00): napo, you're right, it wasn't you. Sorry.
Anyway, it's fixed now! :)
luschi (2019-05-02 23:16:06+00:00): Hallo,

und wieder fügst du den Namen der Bauernhöfe doppelt ein.     
Das ist falsch.     
Detaillierte Erklärung habe ich dir bereits in einem vorherigen Changeset von dir gegeben.     
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69518919     

"place=isolated_dwelling"(Einzelsiedlungen) ist ebenso falsch wie "place=farm" oder jedes andere "place=..."

Ich habe sie wieder entfernt und hoffe dass du sie nicht erneut einzeichnest.

lg
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-30 15:08:21+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
ervinjoshuadelrosario (2019-04-30 13:14:23+00:00): And also removed some portions of a possible alignment of an underwater/underground cable that connects Visayas and Mindanao Grids.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-30 15:08:15+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-04-30 15:08:05+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
viloan (2019-04-30 13:25:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Dimacn (2019-04-30 17:48:49+00:00): Пожалуйста не используйте описательные названия объектам: детская площадка, футбольное поле, болото и пр. В name пишем только официальное название, а характеристики задаются тегами. Подробнее -https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  Пожалуйста исправьте.
Alecs01 (2019-05-02 11:27:58+00:00): Ciao, perchè questa modifica? Il comune non è un place=* nel senso di OSM, ci sono invece due centri abitati e non frazioni, così di centri abitati ce ne sarebbero tre (Jerago, Orago e Jerago con Orago), cosa che nella realtà non esiste. Oltretutto le etichette place così sono messe del tutto a caso, hai messo Jerago ai confini del centro abitato. E peraltro hamlet mi sembra troppo poco, non è coerente con le convenzioni in uso.
ardean80 (2019-05-02 13:28:44+00:00): Ciao. In che senso non sarebbe un comune (place=*)? In realtà, sembrerebbe che il comune ("village") sia "Jerago con Orago" (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerago_con_Orago) e che invece questi due centri abitati siano delle frazioni (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orago)...magari potremmo classificarle come suburb o quarter, anche se questi sono più propri come parti di city...oppure come neighbourhood. 
Per quanto riguarda la collocazione delle label, se è sbagliata mettila pure tu quella giusta.
Alecs01 (2019-05-02 14:16:27+00:00): Ciao, comune e centro abitato sono due concetti diversi, place=* in OSM rappresenta il secondo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:place, la suddivisione amministrativa è invece quest'area https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/45812 dove boundary=administrative indica che è un confine amministrativo, e admin_level=8 è il livello che in Italia corrisponde ai comuni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries nel nostro caso è un comune nato dalla fusione di due comuni in passato, non è che esista un centro abitato che si chiama così.
ardean80 (2019-05-02 15:17:41+00:00): Ok, allora è corretto "elevare" (dato il numero di abitanti) questi centri abitati da "hamlet" a "village". 
Però, secondo te, questo significa allora che un elemento "amministrativo", come un comune (boundary=administrative e admin_level=8) ad esempio, non debba avere anche il corrispettivo elemento "place=*"?
Alecs01 (2019-05-02 17:51:45+00:00): Nella relazione del comune c'è il nodo che ha ruolo di "admin_centre" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members ovvero il capoluogo / sede comunale.
ardean80 (2019-05-03 08:26:49+00:00): E sarebbe quindi corretto caratterizzare questo nodo, che ha ruolo admin_centre, anche con place=village?
Alecs01 (2019-05-03 11:24:10+00:00): Sì esatto
ardean80 (2019-05-03 16:29:52+00:00): Ok, allora correggo i tag di conseguenza. Grazie mille per il confronto e le informazioni. :)
viloan (2019-04-30 13:38:01+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
iWowik (2019-05-01 05:58:06+00:00): День добрый!
Придерживайтесь, пожалуйста, принятого соглашения о наименовании
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или откатывать 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/51560932/history
micheleOSM3 (2022-11-08 07:33:32+00:00): Con brouter web, selezionando "bici da trekking", crea correttamente il percorso, anche attraversando il ponte.
Andrea Musuruane (2019-05-07 10:27:54+00:00): Ciao Michele, ti ricordo che i numeri civici non vanno specificati sugli edifici ma devono essere inseriti come nodi in corrispondenza dell'accesso (porta, cancello, ecc): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97207648 Ciao, Andrea
eggie (2019-04-30 14:25:32+00:00): Hi,
Please comment your contributions properly.
What was your intention here?
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-04-30 14:28:32+00:00): reverted by changeset #69737007
Gazsó (2019-04-30 15:03:45+00:00): sorry, it was a coincidence
eggie (2019-04-30 15:07:21+00:00): Okay.. no hard feelings  :)
Eggie
DemoLogin (2019-06-16 21:44:09+00:00): U are missing the ":rental" suffix.
Is this intended?
mueschel (2019-06-16 22:20:33+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out - it was a mistake, I just intended to add the '_'. Fixed!
zstadler (2019-06-12 13:40:01+00:00): Hello Ilanride22,

I write to you following a discussion in the Israel OSM forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=750884#p750884

You write:
"This changes to the road was made 2 years ago (mainly ended the motoraway section of road 1 in Anava Interchange)."

However, an OpenStreetCam trace
https://openstreetcam.org/details/1289143/1262/track-info
taken in Aug-2018 shows that Sha'ar HaGay is a motorway interchange. which means that so is the section of Road 1 between Anava and Sa'ar HaGay

How did you determine the road classification?

For our reference, the OSM Israel wiki page says:

Inter-city Roads

* First rule for numbered roads: The category is determined by the color of the sign, not by the number of digits!

* Different sections with the same road number can have different categories.

* Speed limits stated below are the defaults by law, though can be altered in a specific road section by a "special speed limit" sign.
PT-53 (2019-04-30 16:15:25+00:00): Hallo roadRunnerzzz,
auch hier ein Mißbrauch des name-Merkmals.
Ziegengehege ist eine Funktionsbeschreibung und kein Name.
Bitte berichtigen.
roadRunnerzzz (2019-05-02 07:01:39+00:00): Wurde berichtigt, vielen dank
PT-53 (2019-05-03 08:57:53+00:00): Hallo roadRunnerzzz, 
ich habe mal im Wiki und im OSM-Forum herumgesucht und halte das Merkmal attraction=animal (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:attraction  und  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:attraction%3Danimal) für am ehesten paßend.
Ob das auf der Musterkarte auf OSM.org (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/48.1032/9.6492) angezeigt wird, kann ich nicht sagen.
Bitte beachte auch, daß der Hinweis im Wiki auf "name" sich nur auf "echte Eigennamen" bezieht (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name).
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
roadRunnerzzz (2019-05-03 11:10:18+00:00): Hi PT-53, habe den tag attraction=animal hinzugefügt. 
siehe #69837872

Gruß
Constable (2019-04-30 14:30:10+00:00): This one is clearly a bridge/culvert, definitely not a ford.
overture (2019-04-30 14:09:02+00:00): Imagem aérea usada: Bing
PT-53 (2019-04-30 16:13:36+00:00): Hallo  roadRunnerzzz,
ich kann mich nicht erinnern, bei meinen Radtouren dort Parkplätze gesehen zu haben. Auch auf den Luftbildern ist dort nichts zu erkennen.
Sind die Parkplätze neu?
Fragende Grüße
roadRunnerzzz (2019-05-02 07:02:25+00:00): Ja wurden letztes Jahr neu errichtet
Viele grüße
Nmxosm (2019-04-30 14:19:12+00:00): Hallo jcrow,

in deinem Änderungssatz erstellst du Toiletten und vergibst den Namen "Public toilet". Ist dies wirklich der Name oder eher eine Beschreibung (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben).

Außerdem existiert direkt in der Nähe https://osm.org/node/6376020336. Hast du die Toilette aufgrund veralteter Kartendaten in OsmAnd eventuell doppelt eingetragen?

VlG Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2019-06-14 08:52:45+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.

Nmxosm
Constable (2019-04-30 14:20:21+00:00): why did you replace amenity=school tag with natural=grassland?
this doesn't make sense and it's also vandalism. Please stop it
PT-53 (2019-04-30 16:09:22+00:00): Hallo  roadRunnerzzz,
ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, daß dieser Brunnen (?) den Eigennamen "Nördliches Federseebecken" trägt. Bitte falsche name-Verwendung löschen.
Grüße
roadRunnerzzz (2019-05-02 07:03:53+00:00): Das ist ein Grundwasservorkommen für die Trinkwasserversorgung.
Welche Kategorie würden Sie vorschlagen?
Viele Grüße
PT-53 (2019-05-03 10:00:17+00:00): Hallo roadRunnerzzz,
in OSM gilt die Regel, daß wir (nur) Mappen, was wir sehen. Ein Grundwasservorkommen gehört da eigentlich nicht dazu.
Ein Ausnahme von o.g. Regel gibt es für Natur- und Wasserschutzgebiete. Schau Dir mal im Wiki-DE:How to map a (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a#) die Zusammenfassung für Wasserschutzgebiet an.
Wasserschutzgebiete dürften aber wohl einiges größer sein als die von Dir eingezeichnete Fläche.
Ist dort wirklich eine Quelle? Diese würde man nur mit einem Punkt und nicht mit einer Fläche einzeichnen (Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural=spring?uselang=de)
Fragende Grüße
roadRunnerzzz (2019-05-03 10:42:04+00:00): Das ist eine Fläche, die von einem Zaun umschlossen wird. Darunter befindet sich das Grundwasservorkommen. Ich habe mal zur Sicherheit den Eintrag herausgenommen.
Andre68 (2019-05-01 06:42:22+00:00): Again, there are duplicated coastlines! WHY?? You could have used and refine the old one. Why creating a new one? This time, you should clean up this mess! I will not. This also means, that I completely stop cleaning up coastline around the world for several days. Great job!
Verdy_p (2019-05-01 11:22:24+00:00): There's NO duplicate lines at all. Some of them are split or joined, you're probably not up to date with your local data.