piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:40:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433669 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44183759 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:39:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433636 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44183942 because there was a problem with licence of data use
scruss (2017-04-25 15:44:18+00:00): Hey, you *can't* use the city's open data for turn restrictions. The data licence isn't compatible with OSM.

Please revert these changes and any that used the city's data. We're working closely with the city to get the data usable, but we're not there yet.
mvexel (2017-04-27 15:08:21+00:00): Hi scruss -- you contacted me through email about this as well. We won't use the city data any longer untill we resolve this together.
manoharuss (2016-12-06 05:20:37+00:00): Hi margonotmango,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. But I have observed you have been creating, tagging a number of ways at intersections with relation `type=lanelet` giving roles to ways `left` and `right`. This seems odd. I couldn't find information regarding this tagging scheme in the wiki. Can you explain the reasoning behind this and discussed source of this type of tagging scheme.

Best,

Manohar
margonotmango (2016-12-06 05:29:00+00:00): HI Manohar,
Please check this https://github.com/phbender/liblanelet. 
But now I encountered some problems,When I upload the data to the server, it will prompt a lot of conflicts, I would like to temporarily change the data back to the initial state, and I also back up the initial data, but when I uploaded, it will encounter a lot of conflicts, I feel very confused.
manoharuss (2016-12-06 06:15:26+00:00): Hi margonotmango,

This seems like a private project and the changes to the data on OSM seems to be undiscussed. Could you please revert all your changesets that have lanelet mapping. Let me know if you need help in reversion. 

Best,
Manohar
margonotmango (2016-12-06 07:24:36+00:00): Hi manoharuss,
Please tell me how to revert,thanks a lot.
Best,
Margonotmango
margonotmango (2016-12-06 08:53:04+00:00): Hi manoharuss, 
I have the previous osm file,but I don't know how to revert.
Margonotmango
manoharuss (2016-12-06 12:09:18+00:00): Hi margonotmango,

I see that you are using JOSM. You can goto `Data` in top menu, -> Select `Revert Changeset`. You should give each changeset ID and revert. Remember that you cannot do randomly. You must revert in the order of latest to last. Please follow this guide. Once you revert all the changesets, you must upload the changes to OSM. Read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Reverter

Best,
Manohar
margonotmango (2016-12-07 01:01:55+00:00): Hi manoharuss, 
Thank you.I will try.
Best,
Margonotmango
margonotmango (2016-12-12 02:30:45+00:00): Hi manoharuss,
I was trying to revert changes.It started well, but after a few times, when I click "revert changeset",it says"unable to upload or download data from http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/44174029   due to data transfer issues.
What should I do?
Best,
Margonotmango
Alexey Lukin (2016-12-19 03:09:18+00:00): Can someone help revert this series of changesets? It breaks continuity of many roads and intersections in Cambridge, MA, and also shifts Red Line tracks away from their accurate alignment established in a changeset 31029556.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:37:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433614 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44184886 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:36:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433613 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44184962 because there was a problem with licence of data use
mueschel (2016-12-07 11:44:53+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tagging of the bus stops? There are some not common tags on the nodes:

  departure = journalier
  departure_per_day = 1
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Interval


  destination_place = Niamey, Niger
Commonly tagged as 'to=*'

  e-mail = stm_transport@yahoo.fr
email=*


  internet_access = oui
Value should be english -  'yes'

Jan
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:32:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433501 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44185271 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:30:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433499 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44185292 because there was a problem with licence of data use
jlevente (2016-12-05 15:06:17+00:00): bwaaah! and accidentally uploaded some other unsaved changes from yesterday within the same changeset. that is buildings from Szeged, Hungary.
naoliv (2016-12-06 20:28:53+00:00): Tá foda hein Erick
Tá cheio de ponte grudada na rodovia aqui também
naoliv (2016-12-06 20:39:39+00:00): Erick, sério.
Para com essas edições em massa que você faz. Só clica no botão de corrigir do JOSM se você verificar objeto por objeto.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-12-06 20:41:20+00:00): Eu estou conferindo agora, mas ué, não sei como esse de ligr nós passu, tem que ser revertido então. ;/
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-12-06 21:24:56+00:00): Reverti, valeu por avisar
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:30:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433486 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44185840 because there was a problem with licence of data use
Polarbear (2017-01-23 16:47:21+00:00): Bot45715, bitte halte deine Changesets kleiner und auf einzelne Themen bezogen. Bitte benenne urheberrechtlich zulässige Quellen, "knowledge" ist bei der Art deiner Änderungen unplausibel. Ich bitte um Beantwortung folgender Fragen bis zum 30.1.2017:
1.
In welcher konkreten Planungsphase (z.B. Bebauungsplan) finden sich die von dir als "proposed" eingetragene Verlängerung der Wuhletalstr (way 457926313 und 457926312)? Ich habe das nur in 2006 verworfenen Variantendiskussionen im Zuge der Ortsumfahrung Ahrensfelde gefunden. OSM kann keine Sammlung nicht realisierter Ideen werden.
2.
Wie kann eine nicht geplante und nicht gebaute Straße einen Namen, einen ehemaligen Namen, ein maxspeed und einen Bürgersteig haben?
3.
Warum löschst du Hausumring way 245225031, um mit kleiner geometrischer Korrektur w457926306 darüberzuzeichnen? Bitte erhalte die Objekthistorie und verschiebe nur die vorhandenen Nodes. Leider oft bei dir gesehen.
4.
Wieso hat eine landesübergreifende Hochspannungsleitung (w40895990) eine Postleitzahl eines Berliner Stadtteils? Bitte klebe keine Postleitzahlen auf unpassende Objekte; leider auch sehr viel von dir gesehen.
Polarbear (2017-01-31 00:26:27+00:00): Wie üblich keine Antwort. Fiktionen entfernt (CS 45669556+45669486)
user_5359 (2016-12-05 19:34:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t use the name as description!
5m4u9 (2016-12-05 19:29:48+00:00): los cruces están mal hechos, deben ser líneas que continuan a las calles/avenidas hasta que chocan las otras calles. 

las vías que salen de la carretera deben ser de la misma categoría (trunk) y no una inferior

revertí los cambios a lo que estaba, si tienes dudas puedo poner ejemplos para mejor comprensión
Jorge Mauricio González Torrez (2016-12-05 21:39:01+00:00): Gracias por la corrección, entonces de ahora pondré la misma categoría para entradas y salidas, en base a la categoría superior ¿correcto?
5m4u9 (2016-12-09 16:27:13+00:00): si, al principio podría no entenderse pero luego tiene sentido si analizas desde perspectiva de continuidad:

estas en una carretera a una velocidad (en nuestro caso a 80kmph), las salidas son reductores de velocidad y de transición (bajas velocidad), tomas nueva carretera y continua marcha. 

carretera -> salida -> calle residencial, tiene sentido, luego carretera -> salida -> carretera funciona igual bien.

las salidas y entradas, de carreteras nacionales deben ser highway=trunk_link

de lo que añadiste algunos semaforos y otros cruces lo recuperaré para no dejarlo perdido el aprote que hiciste :D

dudas o preguntas puedes hacerlo en el grupo telegram @osmbolivia
user_242798 (2016-12-18 10:39:03+00:00): Landuse=grass and natural=water should NOT overlap. 
natural=water and natural=water should NOT be crossing.
natural=water should NOT be on top of landuse=grass.
All area's should be connected, joined, NOT overlapping. Water is touching the land on land boundary and ONLY on land boundary!
Do you have any idea how much work is involved in correcting these errors?
Sloppy work! Very sloppy!
padvinder (2016-12-18 23:18:36+00:00): Is dit wat stank? vóór dank. Ja, ik weet hoe veel tijd zit in corrigeren. Daar ben ik zelf ook steeds mee bezig. Zo ook hier. OSM hangt van correcties aan elkaar. Nu ziet het er hier in ieder geval een beetje toonbaar uit. Voorheen lag deze hele omgeving in het water. Daar was ook al een opmerking over geplaatst. Ik ben zo aardig geweest dat op te lossen. Kostte me heel veel werk om dat goed te krijgen. En ja dan is het nóg niet perfect. Maar ik ga hier geen tijd meer in steken. Als jij het niet mooi genoeg vindt, dan is dat jammer. Ik merk dat het moeilijk hebt met imperfecties AnkEric. Sterkte!
user_242798 (2016-12-19 10:48:45+00:00): Still not perfect? I’m having an issue with imperfections?
The complete area is flooded. And is still flooded. Not for mapnik (openstreetmap.org) but for other renderers it’s still not ok!
A flooded area is not just an imperfection!
This Changeset has not resolved and only created more imperfections, more errors.
An island (grass) has a white boundary section where grass and water are not connected or overlapping.
This changeset has created even more errors than before and makes resolving even harder.
Main issue is related to overlapping, crossing, self-intersecting ways and multipolygons.
This is not resolved by adding more simple polygons on top of other polygons and multipolygons.
Rule one: never touch a multipolygon by using Potlatch 2. This tool is end-of-life, not supported anymore and incapable of handling multipolygons.
No user is capable of handling multipolygons by Potlatch. Either use JOSM or do nothing!
My dilemma is now: either do not resolve (issue is existing for already a long time) or, if I want to resolve, first step would be to revert this changeset and THEN correct the multipolygons.
If you encounter an issue (yes, this is an issue) and you cannot resolve (because Potlatch cannot handle multipolygons) you should ask for help. And not make things even worse!
user_242798 (2016-12-24 07:47:42+00:00): Area is not flooded anymore.
Resolved by: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44627018 (23 december 2016).
Inner way in Multipolygon was incorrectly tagged by [natural=water].
Subsequent - PROJECT - Changesets to resolve all overlapping landuse and natural will be resolved before 2017. Currently to much white space is left (not connecting, crossing or overlapping area).
MiroJanosik (2016-12-07 07:12:43+00:00): Ahoj, tu sa pri importe stalo nieco divne, kazdy bod importovanych domov ma adresu "Gajary". Jednotlive body stien by nemali mat adresy...
Peter Vojtek (2016-12-07 20:53:14+00:00): moja chyba, tu by to malo byt opravene:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44244535
user_5359 (2016-12-05 19:24:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You paint a not closed way along the highway "South Canton Center Road“ and add the tag building=yes. A highway isn’t a building. I have delete your entry.
joost schouppe (2016-12-09 08:20:50+00:00): Hi ACR+,
Please don't play around in OpenStreetMap. You are introducing data directly into a global database used by millions of people.
You are very welcome to make constructive edits. if you need any help, do feel free to contact me.

Joost
muralito (2016-12-05 20:10:12+00:00): NOOOO!!!!!!. DO NOT CHANGE THINGS ALREADY MAPPED WITHOUT KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONTEXT. Colegio Savio was mapped well. TWO DIFFERENT SCHOOLS IN THE SAME BUILDING. SO poolygon was tagged bulding=school but no amenity=school.
muralito (2016-12-05 20:12:26+00:00): THE ROOF IS THE ROOF, THE FUEL STATION IS MORE THAN THE ROOF. DO NOT DELETE THE FUEL STATION NODES!!!!
SomeoneElse (2016-12-05 21:32:58+00:00): Also "Edits in Kuwait"???  Did someone get very lost?
Canyonsrcool (2016-12-06 17:16:19+00:00): This comment was by accident and forgot to be changed to apply to Uruguay.
DaxServer (2016-12-05 17:25:16+00:00): The house numbers seems to be a phone number. Please update!
R0bst3r (2016-12-06 13:10:50+00:00): Hallo doDO93-marienfels,
mit deinen "Ergänzungen" hast du die Straße "Im Rosberg" in Dachsenhausen auf "Rosberg" geändert. Ist dies vor Ort bestätigt? Die Straßenauswertung mit offiziellen Namen sowie die Straßenverzeichnisse von RLP kennen nur den vorherigen Namen.

Siehe: http://regio-osm.de/listofstreets/evaluation?title=Dachsenhausen&country=Bundesrepublik%20Deutschland
doDo93-marienfels (2016-12-06 15:26:40+00:00): Hallo R0bst3r,
vor Ort, an der Kreuzung zur Winterwerber Straße steht ein Straßennamenschild, auf diesem ist nur "Rosberg" zu lesen.
R0bst3r (2016-12-06 16:05:12+00:00): OK, Danke!
surveyor54 (2016-12-06 09:51:31+00:00): Hallo Brian1966,
willkommen bei OSM.
Du hast dich bestimmt gewundert, dass dein Eintrag in der OSM-Karte nicht dargestellt wird.
Man sollte sich vor einem Eintrag doch ein bisschen mit der Materie befassen.
Siehe hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:How_to_map_a

Du brauchst an den bestehenden Gebäuden nichts zu ändern, einfach einen neuen poi setzen und diesem die richtigen tags hinzufügen.
Ich habe das für dich schon erledigt, siehe hier:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44204416#map=19/49.44693/8.89898

Gruß
surveyor54
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-05 19:47:21+00:00): This changeset should be reverted! See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44189128
SomeoneElse (2016-12-05 20:03:07+00:00): Hello Hyperz2016 and welcome to OpenStreetMap!  
It looks like something went wrong here - lots of things got deleted and some things just got moved around.  I've changed it back.
If you like some help, please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Beginners'_guide or https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC .
(Otomatik çeviri)
Merhaba Hyperz2016 ve OpenStreetMap'e hoş geldiniz!
Bir şeyler yanlış gitti gibi görünüyor - birçok şey silinmiş ve bazı şeyler dolaşmış durumda. Onu değiştirdim.
Biraz isterseniz lütfen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tr:Beginners'_guide veya https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC adresini okuyun.
naoliv (2016-12-06 10:40:16+00:00): Erick, várias vezes já foi falado que não é certo somente clicar em validar e depois em "corrigir" no JOSM.
Está passando muito coisa errada que poderia ser corrigida se os objetos fosse verificados manualmente.
Também está gerando mudanças incorretas.
Por exemplo, essa rodovia secondary ficou quebrada com um uma rotatória unclassified: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236022128 exatamente como essa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236022175 e como várias outras.
Não dá para continuar validando e alterando os dados dessa forma, sem verificar um por um.
Klumbumbus (2016-12-06 21:46:21+00:00): Other example of  wrong changes of this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3509224467 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3670449839
naoliv (2016-12-06 22:00:14+00:00): Yes, they will be reverted. Thanks!
naoliv (2017-01-19 02:10:01+00:00): natinacio, cuidado ao reclassificar as ruas, por favor.
Você aumentou a hierarquia de vários trechos sem um critério aparente.
Por exemplo, essa parte https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/162252648
Ficou com a hierarquia "quebrada" em relação ao seu redor. A via que era terciária e continua agora possui um trecho secundário no meio, sem uma lógica para isso.
Há vários outros trechos que aconteceu a mesma coisa (vias com a hierarquia descontínua).
Na dúvida evite mexer em classificação de vias.
Além disso, é importante colocar uma descrição em suas edições, para que os outros mapeadores possam entender um pouco melhor o que você quis fazer.
acsd (2016-12-05 19:12:49+00:00): В карьере реально остановка, или название карьера хотели обозначить?
derbog (2016-12-05 20:17:47+00:00): шлагбаум, дальше к берегу проезд закрыт,  рыбаки оставляют машины и идут пешком. Точка для них
ff5722 (2016-12-05 21:23:07+00:00): Hi, can you also at least add the power=plant tag? makes it easier to find them to add more info later.
I will add them to existing ones myself. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ktD
katpatuka (2016-12-06 04:31:21+00:00): Ok, sounds logical ;)
tamas0606 (2016-12-05 19:46:18+00:00): Edit: Madách Liget
marczoutendijk (2022-02-11 13:42:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4540110898#map=18/8.48745/-13.23642
office=Private is not an expected value for the office key. What did you want to say there?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features#Office
literan (2016-12-06 13:38:21+00:00): access=no это когда ворота заварены, и даже с ключом не войдешь. Может, все же access=private здесь?
aq123 (2016-12-06 18:03:20+00:00): Хм, согласен, это закрытые ворота в проездах к жилым домам, private тут больше подойдёт. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dno тут пишут, что *=no это как *=private, только более строгий запрет. 
Поэтому к Дому приёмов МИД, я думаю, лучше оставить access=no, чтобы было понятно, что туда совсем нельзя.
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:04:13+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457956961
has no tags and is not part of any relation. What is it?
zstadler (2022-05-28 07:28:56+00:00): Deleted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121604451
maraf24 (2016-12-07 09:23:30+00:00): Ulica nazywa się Józefa Beka, a nie Józefa Becka.
Nasze Miasto Niepołomice (2016-12-09 15:46:55+00:00): Nie było kogoś takiego jak Józef Bek, jeszcze jedno wycofanie mojej edycji a będziesz wysyłać rodzinie listy z Auschwitz
maraf24 (2016-12-09 18:05:26+00:00): Ciekawe, że wikipedia jest innego zdania.
Oraz uchwała rady miejskiej, do której dane podałem w source:name.
Igrasz z ogniem.
Nasze Miasto Niepołomice (2016-12-09 19:15:23+00:00): Nie było takiej osoby, uchwała zawiera oczywisty błąd pisarski.
maraf24 (2016-12-09 19:26:51+00:00): Nie kłam, masz na wikipedii napisane, kto to był Józef Bek i jakie miał związki z Limanową.
maraf24 (2016-12-09 19:28:01+00:00): Poza tym uważam, że twoja druga wypowiedź w tej dyskusji zawiera groźby karalne.
Nasze Miasto Niepołomice (2016-12-09 19:40:29+00:00): A niech zawiera nawet groźby chujowe. Chuj w dupe temu jebanemu państwu.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-09-28 14:29:21+00:00): como conseguiu mapear essas ruas que não existem em imagens?
woodpeck (2017-11-20 22:44:47+00:00): Ist das hier wirklich ein "Marktplatz" (wo man hingehen und einkaufen kann), oder doch nur das Büro eines Dienstleisters? Der Eintrag kommt mir ein bisschen sehr "werblich" vor.
Felipe Alves (2016-12-07 17:27:04+00:00): Oi, Juracy. O que quis representar com este abrigo na R. Dr. Alfredo Weyne?
ff5722 (2016-12-07 19:39:07+00:00): Is dit geen vergissing, of is hier echt een flinke heuvel?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4540242016
Nesim (2016-12-05 20:20:09+00:00): Merhaba, siteleri eklerken yerleşim yeri etiketiyle eklense daha güzel olacak.
Rub21 (2016-12-05 20:57:59+00:00): I made a mistake uploading my change, I've already reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44192420
arvdk (2017-10-09 06:17:32+00:00): Even een vraagje over bruggetjes Ridder van Catsweg: Bij sommige (bijvoorbeeld nr 242) staat een auto op het erf. U denkt dat die niet over het bruggetje gekomen is? Ik denk dat u gelijk heeft als u zegt dat sommige ervan voetgangersbruggetjes zijn, maar zie Mapillary, sommige zijn volledig geasfalteerd en geschikt(bedoeld) voor auto's. Het is bij mij één straat verder, ik kan zo langslopen als het nodig is...
CJTmmr (2017-10-09 11:43:45+00:00): Je hebt helemaal gelijk - e.e.a heb ik aangepast.Oorspronkelijk waren ze als unclassified er in gezet - dat zag er ook raar uit.
arvdk (2017-10-09 12:19:44+00:00): Bedankt! Unclassified, dat was ik. Ik denk dat ik toen nog niet wist van 'driveway', 't was één van mijn eerste eddits denk ik.
alphensebezorger (2017-10-09 17:33:29+00:00): Vergis ik me of is de Ridder van Catsweg nu ook als voetganger alleen open voor bestemmingsverkeer in OSM? Zou alleen een tag motor_vehicle=destination hier niet voldoende zijn? Alle andere access-tags zijn toch default voor residential?
CJTmmr (2017-10-09 19:18:36+00:00): Ook helemaal gelijk! goed gezien- de access=destination kan eraf. Aangepast met vehicle=destination; bicycle=yes. 
Eigenlijk staat op het onderbord: "uitzonderd *fietssymbool* en voertuigen aanwonenden" , maar destination lijkt me wel goed; ook voor bromfietsen niet algemeen toegangelijk dus. Deze aanpassing zojuist gedaan
alphensebezorger (2017-10-09 20:38:20+00:00): Lijkt me mooi genoeg zo. "destination" dekt weliswaar niet helemaal de lading, (volgens OSM mag ik nu wel met m'n brommer op bezoek bij aanwonenden, oom agent vindt waarschijnlijk van niet) maar "vehicle=residents" is ook nogal ongebruikelijk.
arvdk (2017-10-09 20:50:50+00:00): Hmm, nu je het zegt. Nooit opgevallen dat brommers er dus niet mogen komen als ze er niet wonen. De praktijk is vaak anders ^^ ( https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.02189333333331&lng=4.708396666666658&z=17&pKey=OO8WMEtmw3sWrutMk6ANag&focus=photo )  Bedankt  alphensebezorger, je houdt ons scherp :)
dan980 (2016-12-06 14:30:52+00:00): Ti è già stato segnalato che non devi modificare di tua iniziativa i nomi dei Comuni. Se vuoi dire la tua fallo sulla mailing list. Nascondersi dietro un account fasullo creato ad hoc non è minimamente corretto.
tuxayo (2018-03-16 07:47:17+00:00): Most (all?) are shop=art or tourism=gallery and not museum, can you fix this?
tuxayo (2018-05-13 13:15:53+00:00): ?
StephaneP (2016-12-06 09:02:37+00:00): Houla ! Tu as fait une fausse manip sur les noeuds du way 455896865 (regarde https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44192934#map=16)
Je viens de corriger
CartoCharles (2016-12-06 10:23:29+00:00): Mince, on dirait que j'ai déplacé tout le way. Une fausse manip effectivement. Bien vu et désolé pour le dérangement.
ForstEK (2019-03-13 17:22:51+00:00): Hola! Ha agregado muchas tiendas sin un tipo específico. Debe aclararlos lo antes posible. Por favor, consulte la página de ayuda aquí: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:shop

Hello! You had added many stores without a specific type. Can you clarify them as soon as possible? Please see the help page here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop
muralito (2016-12-06 03:11:08+00:00): DO NOT CONVERT NODES TO WAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!
YOU ARE TRASHING THE MAP, ADDING BAD DATA, DESTROYING HISTORY OF EXISTING DATA AND NOT IMPROVING PRECISION

ALSO YOUR SOURCE IS NOT WHAT YOU DECLARE. IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAP WHAT YOU ARE MAPPING USING THEM. DECLARE THE REAL SOURCE YOU ARE USING.
muralito (2016-12-06 03:13:09+00:00): WHRE THE FCK  DO YOU SEE ASPHALT IN  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78105016 ?
REDOUBLE OR TRIPLE CHECK YOUR SOURCE!!! 

PLEASE DO NOT ADD BAAAAAADDDDD DATA. ITS PREFERRED TO NOT HAVE DATA THAN TO HAVE IT WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
muralito (2016-12-06 03:52:19+00:00): AND WEHRE DID YOU SEE ASPHALT IN https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305316206
or https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180834256
?????????????????????

SOURCE?????????
burtlang (2016-12-06 17:56:29+00:00): Prior to me entering a surface type, there was no other surface type present. Thank you for your observation. But what I see on my ground survey on that particular road is asphalt.
muralito (2016-12-06 18:15:42+00:00): It's prefered to have no surface tagged, than have the wrong surface tagged. The first is an omission, the last is an error.

If you see asphalt, then your ground survey is wrong or low quality! You should stop making changes based on this survey, to first check the quality of the survey and try to find how those errors were introduced in the survey. If not you will probably "inadvertently" continue adding bad data, only that those next times it won't be inadvertently because there were a lots of warnings about the quality of the survey.