piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
spiregrain (2021-01-19 20:50:58+00:00): Thank you.  When you have a moment, I would be interested to learn why you seem to be using multiple accounts.   Was it an automated change and you are the human in charge?  Will you consider visiting areas that appear well-mapped before making changes in future?  Will you check the OSM history of ares, to make sure you're not painstakingly undoing the work of others to return the map to the past?   Do you work for Facebook, and will you be more careful in future?
VLD071 (2021-01-19 21:13:18+00:00): Yes of course, my colleague and I were mapping this intersection to maxar imagery. She updated the geometry and I was helping with a couple modifications after the fact. I apologize for our misunderstand and will be more diligent to potential out of date imagery in the future.
CjMalone (2021-01-19 20:16:11+00:00): Looks good to me

Thank you!
ted3sco (2021-01-29 16:43:35+00:00): Salut, incerc sa inteleg de ce ai modifica parcurile in zone de padure cand ele sunt clar parcuri ? Plus campusul universitatii si spitalul de neuro care clar nu sunt paduri...
Vezi pe wiki diferentele intre park, wood si forest.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwood
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforest
O sa dau revert la aceste modificari.
5m4u9 (2021-01-21 08:00:45+00:00): hola, gracias por corregir!
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-20 10:31:28+00:00): ... and a tree. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8022347235
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-20 10:32:06+00:00): A house in the UK and a tree in the USA,
highflyer74 (2021-01-20 07:47:42+00:00): Hallo nochmal!

Bitte füge nicht zu jedem Gebäude ein ref=Cold Storage hinzu. Das Tag ref=* wird anders verwendet (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:ref). Wenn Du Dir nicht sicher bist, schaue bitte immer ins Wiki, um dazuzulernen.

In diesem Fall würde man building=warehouse nutzen.
west89 (2021-01-20 20:19:36+00:00): Habe es jetzt geändert
ivanbranco (2021-02-24 16:45:50+00:00): Hi Alex,

Unbuilt space=* is not a valid tag. What's the information you're trying to add?
literan (2021-01-20 20:30:06+00:00): теги bicycle=yes, foot=yes, horse=no не про физическую возможность проезда, а про юридическое разрешение/запрет. Они не нужны (там ведь нет знака "Проезд на лошадях запрещен"?), подробнее написано у меня в профиле. Уберу.
eggie (2021-01-19 21:53:08+00:00): Dag Jan,

Een schuurrtje verwijderen is natuurlijk geen probleem. Het staat nog wel in de BAG
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=annelien&resultOffset=0&objectId=0546100000059028&geometry.x=90875.551&geometry.y=462180.2069985&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0546100000059028

Dat betekent dat je kans hebt dat het bij periodieke BAG-update terugkomt.
Het beste kun je dus een terugmelding doen naar het Kadaster met de  mededeling.. gebouw niet aangetroffen. (gesloopt) oid.
Ze zullen het dan verwerken en het zal niet opnieuw geïmporteerd kunnen worden.
Een heel verhaal voor een klein schuurtje :)
Voor de terugmelding zie link BAG. 
MVG
eggie
Jan vH (2021-01-24 09:22:15+00:00): via je bag- link terugmelding naar bagkaart gemaakt
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-20 07:45:18+00:00): Ciao. Il campo phone:tollfree non lo vedo documentato sulla wiki. Bisognerebbe usare phone:IT https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Support_for_multiple_countries Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97793463
user_5359 (2021-01-20 05:05:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node.
Ale_Zena_IT (2021-03-03 15:33:23+00:00): Hello,
I noticed in this changeset you have cancelled 4 relations. Please read the JOSM's warnings next times before to upload your changeset.
skifans (2021-02-01 13:58:42+00:00): Hi Paul, did you mean to add this with a  public_transport:version=2 tag? Looks to a little sort of between 1 and 2 to me? Its mostly 2 but you've still get the forward/backwards roles which are not valid under V2: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses#Adding_streets_to_the_relation
Paul Berry (2021-02-01 16:37:28+00:00): Yes, it's intended to be compliant with version 2 tagging (both parent and child relations) My understanding was that the role reflected whether the actual route followed the flow of the way (forward) or went against it (backward), so that, for example, data consumers can tell which way round a loop a service runs.

Having actually read the wiki (thanks for the link) it seems the routing hinges on the correct order of ways rather than the role.

Thanks for the pointers here. I'll revise the child relations accordingly.
gscscnd (2021-01-20 09:37:36+00:00): Dzielnica (place=suburb) Rybnik-Północ jest oznaczona punktem <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2951243836>, a punkt <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6727532557> to tylko „okolica”/„sąsiedztwo” nazwane „Północ” (podobnie jak w przypadku dzielnicy Paruszowiec-Piaski, gdzie mamy osobne okolice/sąsiedztwa Paruszowiec i Piaski). Więc ten drugi punkt otagowałbym z powrotem jako place=neighbourhood, a ten pierwszy dodał zamiast niego do relacji z rolą admin_centre.

Tag admin_centre na punkcie <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3328375042> jest zbędny. Na świecie występuje niecałe 300 razy. Chyba chodziło o rolę w relacji, a nie tag.

Dodawaj źródła do zestawów zmian. Granice rysujesz z PRG?
Kiiijek (2021-01-20 13:26:24+00:00): Dobra, dzięki. Wprowadzę wszystkie potrzebne poprawki. A granicę rysuję w iD.
gscscnd (2021-01-20 13:58:52+00:00): Chodziło mi o źródło danych (PRG — Państwowy Rejestr Granic).
Kiiijek (2021-01-20 14:00:52+00:00): Korzystam z Rybnickiego Systemu Informacji Przestrzennej.
dieterdreist (2021-02-10 23:22:59+00:00): con questa modifica sono stati cancellati tutte le tag che descrivevano il parco di Veio, e sono stato sostituiti con "suolo ad uso residenziale". E' una modifica apposita o per sbaglio?
fede6615 (2021-02-17 22:53:11+00:00): Effettivamente ho creato suoli ad uso residenziali, perchè come puoi vedere dalle immagini satelliutari ci sono case, ti posso dire che sono di zona e li ci sono effettivamente centri abitati (Con rispettivi nomi). Si stava anche già discutendo su come cambiare questa cosa, non sappiamo il/i tag da mettere e nemmeno come designare le zone. Vedo di fare il possibile per sistemare questa zona, mi potresti consigliare qualcosa? Grazie
dieterdreist (2021-02-18 23:39:15+00:00): Ciao Fede,
ti consiglio di aggiungere piccoli blocchi di isolati, senza connettere i poligoni con le strade, in modo da avere "il suolo privato, residenziale" / le abitazioni compresi i giardini e le aree interne, e mettendo i tag "landuse=residential" dove ci sono abitazioni, invece le scuole le lasci fuori e metti amenity=school come poligono (compreso tutte le pertinenze), e similmente per le altre funzioni che non sono abitazioni. Lo stesso anche con landuse=commercial e industrial (se ci sono). In questo modo, ammetto lento, puoi creare con alto livello di dettaglio e allo stesso facile da mantenere, tutto il centro abitato. Invece per i nomi il modo più semplice è mettere un punto / node con place=hamlet/village/town/suburb ecc. al "centro" (dove pensi si trovi il centro), insieme al tag "name". Volendo potresti applicare lo stesso tag anche ad un area, ma non è molto usato e credo che non venga visualizzato attualmente sulla mappa principale.
Esiste anche una mailing list nazionale, talk-it ed una per Roma e Lazio, talk-it-lazio, dove si possono fare domande e ottenere risposte. (Anche un canale Telegram e svariati altri canali ci sono). In passato ci siamo incontrati una volta al mese, ma attualmente per Covid è sospeso. 
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo

un saluto,
Martin
bxl-forever (2021-01-20 13:08:13+00:00): Nice work.
I think indoor=yes is more appropriate than tunnel_building_passage here.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tunnel%3Dbuilding_passage#When_not_to_use
Thierry1030 (2021-01-20 22:52:00+00:00): Thanks for your remark.
2 things:
1) it's not a footway&buidling_passage but a highway=corridor and indoor=yes. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcorridor -> I did the necessary changes
2) I added them because these "corridors" are all free of charge. I was there yesterday for the first time ... :-)
bxl-forever (2021-01-21 08:27:52+00:00): ;-)
Constable (2021-01-21 20:10:00+00:00): Ciao Andrea, benvenuto su OSM!
occhio ai nomi degli oggetti, il nome va indicato solo se l'oggetto che aggiungi alla mappa ne ha effettivamente uno (Stadio di San Siro, Palazzo Chigi,...), la fontana in oggetto immagino non abbia un nome ufficiale, il nome quindi andrebbe omesso.
Grazie, ciao!
gscscnd (2021-01-20 09:17:41+00:00): Wydaje mi się, że szczyt i atrakcja mogłyby być zaznaczone jako jeden punkt. Ewentualnie zapytaj na forum.
irik (2021-01-20 21:50:05+00:00): słusznie, scalone
carfog81 (2021-01-29 18:20:54+00:00): Esta no es el tipo de vía correcto. No adicionar vías sobre otras ya existentes, por favor no haga más daños al mapa.
Por favor consulte nuestra Guía para mapear Colombia. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia
mahdi1234 (2021-01-20 11:24:19+00:00): Ahoj, po zmene typu cesty bys mohl doplnit i povrch, napr asfalt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:surface a odstranit prebytecne tracktype=grade3 a vitej v OSM :)
carfog81 (2021-01-29 18:15:53+00:00): Esta no es el tipo de vía correcto. No adicionar vías sobre otras ya existentes, por favor no haga más daños al mapa.
Por favor consulte nuestra Guía para mapear Colombia. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia
gileri (2021-01-19 23:06:09+00:00): Et retrait tags addr:* redondants mis dans le même changeset par erreur.
highflyer74 (2021-01-20 07:28:29+00:00): Moin! 

Ich bin mir nicht sicher, was Du mit "Point corrected" meinst, aber an dieser Stelle sind recht viele Fehler. Wolltest Du die beheben?

Zum einen ist der Weg nicht mit der Straße verbunden, dann hängt noch ein Landuse am Weg und die Landuses selbst sind nicht sinnvoll miteinander verbunden.

Ich repariere das eben. Viele Grüße!
west89 (2021-01-20 20:35:31+00:00): Habe den Stromkasten Punkt ausgebesst.
iey6Om7C (2021-01-20 08:40:35+00:00): Здравствуйте! Тег name не используется для описания объектов, для этого есть description (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F). Кроме того, в случае дорог, желательно по возможности использовать уточняющие теги, такие как tracktype, smoothness и surface (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dtrack). Подтопленные участки можно отметить как брод или окружить болотом. Непроходимые заросшие дороги можно, например, отметить префиксом abandoned (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B5%D1%84%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%81%D1%8B_%D0%B6%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BD%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BE_%D1%86%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-14 11:56:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99246621 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely naming edits near Sarajevo following a number of DWG complaints.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99196845
carfog81 (2021-01-29 18:14:41+00:00): Esta no es el tipo de vía correcto. No adicionar vías sobre otras ya existentes, por favor no haga más daños al mapa.
Por favor consulte nuestra Guía para mapear Colombia. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia
johnarupire (2021-02-03 02:15:31+00:00): Los elementos agregados no corresponden con lo que se aprecia en la fotografía aérea
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-14 11:56:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99246621 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely naming edits near Sarajevo following a number of DWG complaints.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99196845
heretofore (2021-01-20 16:23:06+00:00): Did you clobber Rock Creek Park?
Multi-Level (2021-01-20 22:24:42+00:00): What do you mean with "clobber"? You may review my changeset at http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=97796639
heretofore (2021-01-20 22:31:53+00:00): Someone broke RCP since the last time I looked at it a few weeks ago, and I saw it in the list of affected relations in the changeset. It might not have been you, though.
user_10654882 (2021-02-08 12:14:00+00:00): Gospodo, oni sto rutirate to imenujte.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-14 11:56:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99246621 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some unlikely naming edits near Sarajevo following a number of DWG complaints.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99196845
SomeoneElse (2021-02-14 12:05:21+00:00): Hello,
The tags you've added here on http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=549594874 seem unlikely.  "highway=cycleway" does not really make sense for MTB routes, if it's not something that a normal bicycle could use.  For MTB tagging see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale .
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-02-14 12:05:40+00:00): Zdravo,
Oznake koje ste ovdje dodali na http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=549594874 izgledaju malo vjerojatno. "autocesta = biciklistička staza" zapravo nema smisla za MTB rute, ako to nije nešto što bi običan bicikl mogao koristiti. MTB označavanje potražite na https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking i https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale.
Lijepi Pozdrav,
Andy
MTB FORIS (2021-02-14 13:10:29+00:00): Dear,
All trails designated as "MTB CITY ROAD" are located within the "MTB CITY ROAD" bicycle park, which is officially approved by the city of East Sarajevo. All trails are physically arranged by our club and marked with bicycle signs. So they have to bear this name. Over time, the park will expand and we will create new trails that we will add to the Openstreatmap database. Please see the links:
http://mtb.4is.info/projekat-mtb-city-road/
http://mtb.4is.info/map/web-aplikacija-mtb-city-road-2/
MTB FORIS (2021-02-14 13:14:56+00:00): Dear,
this terrain, as it is marked, is the Cycling Park "MTB CITY ROAD". The trails will get other names over time, but we are the only ones relevant because we built, arranged and marked them with bike signs. We have permits for the same from the competent institutions.
He can deliver them to you on request. I hope you will appreciate our remark. Because otherwise we will complain to a higher level, that is, to the competent institutions.
With respect,
SomeoneElse (2021-02-14 14:42:25+00:00): > So they have to bear this name.

As already noted on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99196845
that isn't how names are used within OpenStreetMap. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only for details. You may of course wish to set the "operator" of these trails to the organisation that operates them.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_10654882 (2021-02-14 20:05:12+00:00): MTB FORIS, a link to your site means nothing. The mentioned location is mostly privately owned by the local population. There is no bike park here. Prove your existence with relevant documentation.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:39:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:39:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:27:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:33:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:53:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:42:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:49:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
carfog81 (2021-01-29 18:12:44+00:00): Esta no es el tipo de vía correcto. No adicionar vías sobre otras ya existentes, por favor no haga más daños al mapa.
Por favor consulte nuestra Guía para mapear Colombia. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear_en_Colombia
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:22:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:51:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:23:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:43:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:25:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:50:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:50:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
cserpell (2021-01-20 00:13:29+00:00): La mayoría fueron rebajes de nivel, en especial cuando hay calles de tierra o por barrios menores. Pero algunos cambios fueron más importantes. Tal vez alguien de Viña podría revisar.
Reeniz (2021-01-20 02:09:47+00:00): Si una calle es altamente utilizada y es de tierra no veo el porque es necesario disminuirla de categoría. Si te vas a guiar por caracteristicas fisicas existen las etiquetas surface y tracktype.
 Es lo mismo que etiquetar caminos vecinales en zonas ruraes como track .
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97797374
cserpell (2021-01-20 12:45:01+00:00): Es verdad. Igual dejé dos calles de tierra como tertiary porque igual son muy utilizadas, una en Reñaca Alto y otra en el límite con Concón. Hay que ver el cambio que hice como "popuesta", se puede revertir. Quería ver la reacción.
jptolosa (2021-02-05 17:15:39+00:00): Concuerdo con Reeniz. El uso de track para calles de tierra está documentado en la wiki como ejemplo de etiquetado para el render.

Tampoco veo la necesidad de rebajar de clasificación el camino costero. Es una calle bastante importante y alternativa evidente a la Ruta 64. Por el contrario hay sectores residenciales que parecen tener una clasificación más elevada de lo sugerido.

Hay que poner más atención a la función que cumple cada calle y no dejarse llevar por sus características físicas solamente.
cserpell (2021-02-05 22:27:42+00:00): Tendré más cuidado con el tema de la tierra. Creo que el sesgo viene porque en general en Viña la mayoría de las calles "importantes" son pavimentadas, salvo en barrios o muy nuevos o periféricos.

En cuanto a la ruta de la costa, justamente la dejé así porque es muy transitada, y Libertad porque tiene bastante tránsito, en especial transporte público.
jptolosa (2021-02-05 23:45:13+00:00): No entiendo realmente algunos cambios que hiciste, me parece que independiente del criterio y la interpretación que le des a la wiki, introdujiste errores.

Tal vez me ayudes a resolver una discontinuidad que existe desde hace años en Quilpué. Ahora con los arreglos es más complejo y produce desorientación para quien no conozca la ciudad (como yo): https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-33.04877/-71.42966