piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
trigpoint (2021-01-05 11:57:36+00:00): Bore da Männedorf
Again what sources are you using here. public_transport=station seems to be rather wrong on the site of a disused railway station.

This edit needs to be reverted.

Diolch Phil
ottwiz (2021-12-08 23:47:11+00:00): Wow, you did a lot of descriptive things on the roads. Although, sometimes i had to change the tagging to match up your descriptions and the OSM tagging scheme. But yea, thanks for these info!
radiotrefoil (2020-12-31 01:10:18+00:00): a summary of the changes;
1. the area bounded by "Lidsdale State Forest" tagged with landuse=forest and nature reserve/protected area removed
2. actual tree areas (including pine plantations) tagged with natural=wood
JClem (2020-12-31 10:08:45+00:00): This change has broken the continuity of bus routes 58a and 265, by introducing ways for a roundabout, which haven't been added to the bus routes. It's only a mini-roundabout so it would be better to keep it as a node, not a circular way.
J3ADY (2020-12-31 12:46:22+00:00): Ah I had no realisation it would break an existing bus route, apologies! Is there a way I can revert this edit?
JClem (2020-12-31 12:50:57+00:00): I don't know if there's an easy way to revert changes; if there is, it would revert all the other changes you saved at the same time... The simplest fix I think would be to delete the roundabout and re-join the roads at a simple junction. Then tag the junction with highway=mini_roundabout and direction=clockwise which is the correct way to map a mini-roundabout.
J3ADY (2020-12-31 12:56:51+00:00): I've done as requested and have hopefully fixed the two roundabouts that were added and re-added them as mini roundabouts with clockwise tags, hopefully that fixes the issue but do inform me if not so I can make any other changes

Apologies for the error!
JClem (2020-12-31 13:04:34+00:00): Ok, I see the edit. I don't think it's fully worked. If you select any of the roads further away from the junction you'll see they have a relation to the bus routes, but the new short sections you've added don't. Similarly, the existing trunk road has four other tags that the new replacement section doesn't (lanes=2; maxspeed=30 mph; name=Chalford; ref=A350). I suggest you delete the three new ways again. Then instead of adding new ways, just extend the existing ways until they meet. That way they'll automatically pick up the existing tags.
J3ADY (2020-12-31 13:12:49+00:00): I believe I have fixed both roundabouts in question now, they appear to have all the correct tags as before.
JClem (2020-12-31 13:15:20+00:00): Yes, all looks correct now. Good job!
J3ADY (2020-12-31 13:16:24+00:00): Apologies for the inconvenience caused! Still learning my way around some areas of OSM in regards to how to map specific things.
GerdP (2024-05-10 07:04:01+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Ich wundere mich gerade, dass Du hier u.a. der Krümpelbeckstraße ein sidewalk=no verpasst hast. Ich sehe da auf meinen Fotos an dieser Kreuzung https://www.osm.org/node/393402166 überall Gehwege, wenn auch ohne Bordstein. Oder sind das dann Parkflächen?
Tyran (2024-05-10 12:10:28+00:00): Praktisch gibt es keine echten Bürgersteige in Lutten (abgesehen von den Hauptstraßen und kleinen Ausnahmen). Im allgemeinen sind es Multifunktionsstreifen, die zum parken, gehen und Fahrradfahren flexibel genutzt werden.
GerdP (2024-05-10 12:16:39+00:00): Woran macht man das fest? Die tatsächliche Nutzung ist da für mich nachrangig, Autos parken falsch und viele Radfahrer fahren, wo es Ihnen gerade passt.
Tyran (2024-05-10 12:26:55+00:00): An der Widmung durch die Gemeinde. Optisch nicht zu erkennen. Nachbarn hatten bei der Gemeinde nachgefragt, da sie sich mit dem Kinderwagen durch parkende Fzg behindert fühlten. AW: der Gemeinde: es sind Multifunktionsstreifen und keine Bürgersteige.
GerdP (2024-05-10 12:32:52+00:00): Für Multifunktionsstreifen haben wir kein Tag, oder?
Tyran (2024-05-10 12:44:32+00:00): Nach meinem Wissen nicht.
GerdP (2024-05-10 12:46:22+00:00): Dann lass ich es mal so stehen
seattlefyi (2021-01-01 22:38:37+00:00): Hi thanks for the edits! They look pretty good, though have a couple of tips which I'll send separately.
zstadler (2021-10-02 10:24:10+00:00): Hello Arlo James Barnes,

Thank you for your contributions!

In this and a few other changesets you have entered elevation in feet for peak nodes, as can be seen in this Overpass Turbo query -
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1bG0

Note that the wiki
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele?uselang=en#Local_units) says:
"It's tempting to enter an elevation with a unit of measure ("3045 feet") but the tag must be in metres"

Rounding to the nearest meter is usually done when converting elevations to meters.

Best regards,
zstadler
Arlo James Barnes (2021-10-02 20:24:39+00:00): Got it. The use of ele:ft=* seems like a good way to preserve the significant figures, but I'll convert the main ele=* tags later today when I get time.
zstadler (2021-10-03 07:13:49+00:00): Thanks!
blackboxlogic (2020-12-31 14:11:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for your contributions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96699248
Glassman (2021-01-01 19:26:37+00:00): Tip: Just adding the address to the building outline is all that is needed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96701928
user_5359 (2020-12-31 08:31:22+00:00): Hello! Please  have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8276876359: Don't use amenity_1=market instead of amenity=marketplace.
aceman444 (2021-11-27 21:15:00+00:00): Hi, please do not add incomplete and useless addresses containing just addr:city or addr:country.
Aglis IRM-ED (2021-02-04 01:12:10+00:00): Hi vin_28. I changed the classification and geometry  of this way (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/890534362) based on Maxar Premium Imagery. I also made some change around this changeset. Thank you
vin_28 (2021-02-04 05:15:37+00:00): Hi Aglis IRM-ED,

Greetings for the day. Thank you for the update.

Regards,
vin_28.
eggie (2020-12-31 09:34:50+00:00): Lijkt me oke zo..
Niet sport=boules ipv bowls ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dboules

Up to you.
Gr eggie
Aetiusjp (2021-01-01 11:30:58+00:00): Je bent Juist Eggie. Ik kende het verschil tussen de twee niet. Ik weet het nu!
Ik hoop dat je een goed nieuw jaar hebt gehad.

Aetius
eggie (2021-01-01 11:47:11+00:00): Het jaar wat nu komt kan alleen maar beter worden.
De beste wensen,
eggie
Glassman (2021-01-01 19:31:07+00:00): Thanks for fixing all the street names.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96706138
ivanbranco (2021-01-28 00:05:35+00:00): Hi Winona Vaz,

in this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8277170993
what does the vijay nagar=* tag stands for? Can you fix it?
czarny_slupca (2020-12-31 07:42:33+00:00): This two buldings are demolished
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-31 08:04:47+00:00): I reverted my change. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96714280
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
vectro (2022-06-08 15:24:07+00:00): Do you mind commenting on why these ways are marked as private? I didn't see any access restrictions when I was there.
abvincen (2022-06-09 12:02:53+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset.
I have added the private access tag to the road based on the "Private property" street sign board present in the Bing streetside overlay ( https://www.bing.com/maps?cp=33.579337~-117.729387&lvl=17&dir=182.592&style=x&v=2&sV=1 ).
I appreciate the feedback provided, and thanks for making the necessary changes as per latest ground-reality.
Kindly, let me know if incase there are any more concerns with the edit made.
I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
abvincen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96713489
vectro (2022-06-10 02:42:20+00:00): Hmm, interesting. I came in from the other side and didn't see this sign.

Despite the text on this sign this a commercial complex with retail so I think in practice it is definitely open to the public. Do you think access=permissive would be more appropriate?
abvincen (2022-06-10 11:11:14+00:00): Hi,
Based on the ground-reality information that you have provided and since these roads are accessible by everyone, the "access=yes" tag that you have added, seems to be appropriate in this scenario.

Regards,
abvincen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
eggie (2020-12-31 08:43:50+00:00): Dag Ditat.. Dat is nu goed, maar er is wel een ander probleem nu. Je kunt routerelaties niet goed bewerken met een simpele editor als iD. De relatie gaat dan stuk. In dit geval de knooppuntwandelroute 30 - 96
Ik kijk even of het simpel op te lossen is.
Gebruik bij routerelaties editor josm
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710

MVG
eggie
eggie (2020-12-31 08:46:41+00:00): De wandelroute heb ik hersteld.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2020-12-31 08:48:05+00:00): Het stuk ter hoogte van 163a  overlap ook  no. Ik kijk even of hetsimpel  te herstellen is.
eggie (2020-12-31 08:50:25+00:00): Fixed duplicated ways Kanaaldijk Noord .. Opgeplakte highway=service verwijderd
Ditat (2020-12-31 09:10:02+00:00): Dank voor het fixen!
eggie (2020-12-31 09:11:25+00:00): Oke Ditat... Hier zie je wat ik heb gedaan
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96716971

Snel overstappen naar editor JOSM.. Die heeft een ingebouwde validator die waarschuwt bij upload voor dit soort foutjes.
gr eggie
aceman444 (2021-02-07 00:44:45+00:00): Zdravim, co konkretne ste tu opravili? Cesta medzi domami 233 a 234 vobec nemusi byt polnou cestou, len zato, ze je nespevnena. A preco ste Modransku cestu museli rozseknut na 2 useky, ked maju identicke vlasnosti?
A prosim nepouzivajte editor iD ak delite taketo hlavne cesty, na ktorych su zakreslene linky MHD, poskodzuje ich to. Dakujem
Pan Perníček (2021-10-18 13:18:29+00:00): Dobrý den,
dostali jsme hlášení od našeho uživatele, že se tato cesta (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/890684008) nachází na soukromém pozemku, není vůbec přístupná. V ZBGIS také není zakreslena.
Děkuji za ověření.
Pan Perníček (2021-10-18 13:18:47+00:00): #Mapy.cz
Patr1k_P (2021-10-18 13:44:39+00:00): dobry den, cestu som vymazal
lenny32 (2021-03-22 17:32:26+00:00): Bonjour,
N'aurais-tu pas confondu le X avec un R dans "maxspeed:type=FX:urban"  ?
BoumTAC (2021-03-22 17:43:44+00:00): étrange, c'est streetcomplete qui a fait ça, je corrige
Dacc1 (2020-12-31 08:34:16+00:00): I used Bing aerial imagery instead of Maxar Premium Imagery  (Beta)
philippec (2020-12-31 09:36:52+00:00): Jakka, je hebt ze allemaal.
Deze gate is meer een poort voor werkzaamheden die normaal op slot is.
philippec (2021-01-02 17:14:02+00:00): De hondjes mogen pootje baden.
Dat hek loopt twee keer tot de vijver of tot het ontoegankelijk struikgewas.
Ik heb dat vroeger al proberen te fotograferen.
philippec (2021-01-02 17:19:10+00:00): Het zijn van die vele foto's die al 2 maand blijven hangen bij Mapillary.
Voor zoiets zou ik geen smartphone mogen gebruiken.
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/xLz4NKNKxab7zR3p8gP77h
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-31 08:40:20+00:00): How can I map the doctor correctly? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7125680558 There are two doctors in the same surgery.
Stratula (2021-01-02 13:05:19+00:00): Я смотрю дороги в Ильинском и от Ильинского до Башкировки. Мне кажется, это ошибка обозначать их как highway = track.
kms15 (2021-01-02 13:13:54+00:00): Дороги в Ильинском я не трогал. Дорога из Ильинского до Башкировка по факту полевая не отсыпанная. Но может стоит ее повысить для указания, что она главная. Наверное так и сделаю.
kms15 (2021-01-02 13:17:53+00:00): Съезд с шоссе конечно тоже подниму по статусу
❤️‍🔥 (2021-01-26 19:53:37+00:00): I've undone this changeset. If you continue to vandalize the map you will receive a user block from the OSMF Data Working Group
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96716418
woodpeck (2021-01-26 21:34:43+00:00): kylenz, can you explain what the problem was with this edit in your opinion?
❤️‍🔥 (2021-01-26 21:57:01+00:00): @woodpeck - the official & only name of the town in English is Taupō, with the macron over the ō. This is the name used by the local government (the Taupō District Council) and central government. This is also the name used in all signage including official government road signs. 

This was officially recognized in 2019, and since then, the usage of "Taupo" (without the macron) is being phased out & is no longer correct. see https://tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/over-800-m-ori-place-names-made-official. 

This user and a few others continually change place names with macrons like "Taupō" back to "Taupo" and do not engage when comments are left on their changesets
user_12554270 (2021-01-26 22:04:21+00:00): It's far from correct that "the only name of the town in English" is "Taupō".  (This feels like a political POV, which is inappropriate for OSM, which should reflect OTG ("on the ground") reality.)  The spelling "Taupo" (without a macron, which was recently added to the official name) is widespread in English, and on many business and road signposts within the town.  (Some road signs have recently been altered with tape to put a macron over the "o", so the OTG "name" here is debatable.  But the English-language spelling is not (as the English alphabet does not contain "ō".)
❤️‍🔥 (2021-01-26 22:56:50+00:00): hi @ponamu_nz, You said that the name "should reflect OTG ("on the ground") reality" - Taupō is the more common name, and is used in nearly all official government signage on the ground, both from central and local government. Many local businesses have also updated their signage, while others haven't (yet). 

you said "[...] the English-language spelling is not [Taupō] (as the English alphabet does not contain "ō".)" - Taupō is a name in the Te Reo Māori language, not an English word. When a Te Reo Māori name is used in English, it should be written in the only correct way, which is 'Taupō' in this case.
user_12554270 (2021-01-27 04:13:04+00:00): Nonetheless, you appear to be using OSM to try to advance an agenda; this is inappropriate, and antithetical to the purpose of OSM, which is to describe the world as it actually exists.  The fact remains that (1) the town's official name is "Taupō"; (2) the most common signage in English (for both commercial businesses and (to a lesser extend) traffic signs) remains "Taupo"; (3) the spelling "Taupō" can be seen on many government buildings and (some) road signs, but remains (for now) a minority spelling in the town itself.
Therefore, I have changed "name:en" back to "Taupo", but have left "official_name" and (at least for now) "name" as "Taupō"
❤️‍🔥 (2021-01-27 05:54:00+00:00): I'm not sure what you mean by "you appear to be using OSM to try to advance an agenda" - I would like to correct an error on the map that is wrong according to all levels of the New Zealand government and on-the-ground signage... i don't see how that is an "agenda", perhaps you could explain what you meant?

Your arguments (1) and (3) reiterate that Taupō is the current and only official name, and the on-the-ground name. You want to use the wrong name in OSM, and your only argument for using the wrong name is that "the most common signage in English (for both commercial businesses and (to a lesser extend) traffic signs) remains 'Taupo'". This statement is partially wrong, very disputable and also rapidly changing,,

Your claim that the old name (Taupo) is still the most common on road signs is also very wrong. All road signs now say 'Taupō'. There are no road signs left with the old name of 'Taupo', except those that were forgotten by the council, and the street signs that were physically vandalized by racists (see https://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/wellington/123897512/low-iq-vandalism-kpiti-signs-once-again-targetted-by-macron-meddler for another example), which is sadly very similar to what you're doing on OSM...
woodpeck (2021-01-27 10:35:11+00:00): There is a widespread assumption that, if an "English" name is given, it uses only characters that are common in the English language. Having an "English" name with characters neither used in US nor UK English is uncommon; then again, someone born in NZ can also lay claim to being a "native" speaker so if ō is a valid character in NZ English then this maybe warrants wider discussion. Nonetheless, both of you are blowing this totally out of proportion, and I must ask you to immediately stop your edit war AND your accusation of "racism". This is a discussion over what characters can legitimately be included in name:en and it should be had with the wider community. One possible solution is to introduce a "name:en_NZ" in addition to name:en but as I said, this is not an issue for three people to decide. There needs to be a discussion in a suitable medium. Are you able to start this discussion WITHOUT allegations of racism?
❤️‍🔥 (2021-01-28 03:24:48+00:00): Hi @woodpeck, I would welcome further discussion on this topic, where do you suggest that could take place?
woodpeck (2021-01-28 10:42:50+00:00): If nothing else is found I would use the international tagging or talk mailing lists but that would also invite lots of people not familiar with NZ sensitivities. There is a low-traffic talk-nz mailing list (lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz) - not sure if there are enough people on there to be a representative sample of NZ community but maybe worth starting there?
abakus_uploader (2020-12-31 23:31:50+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Øukasz (2021-03-31 12:48:51+00:00): Hello mustafakamil, Mariateresa. I'm crossposting this comment to changesets 100248648 and 96717934.

it looks like features https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/912638031 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12115924 are what is an area split in two by an arbitrary boundary of analysis. They were classified differently, however, on the imagery I don't see a clear boundary. 

Is there a way in which you can improve your process so that seams like this one do not appear?

Thanks!
UNGSC-DTLM-Ale_Zena (2021-03-31 13:27:28+00:00): Hello, I'm Alessandro and I work with Mariateresa on this African United Nation leaded campaigns.

You're right, sorry we don't have fixed this odd situation yet. Basically two mappers worked in theirs bounding boxes without any communication. Now, fortunately, we improved the discussion in our group, but still some area like this one still exist. Thanks so much for having pointed.
Feel free to contact us if you notice strange things :-)
Cheers
  Alessandro
Øukasz (2021-04-15 07:24:38+00:00): Thank you for the response Alessandro,

Glad to hear the process was improved, always good to fix things like that at the source. Thank you. 

Just out of curiousity: if areas right next to each other are occasionally classified differently, I'm wondering if you perhaps also do spotchecks if areas a little further apart (a few kilometers or tens of kilometers for examples) are classified consistently?

Oh, and one more question please: this project is very similar to the landcover classification done in Cameroon, but in Cameroon I don't see any changeset tags identifying it as such. Do you know how the Cameroon classification was done and by whom?

Thanks again,
Lukasz
Dimitar155 (2021-07-31 17:09:44+00:00): Hallo MagZMapper,
Können Sie bitte https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26007718 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371789065 überprüfen? Die Höchstgeschwindigkeit von 7 km/h scheint ein möglicher Fehler zu sein. Vielen Dank im Voraus.
MagZMapper (2021-07-31 17:15:39+00:00): Die Pfarrstraße, dieser Bereich der Planstraße und Teil der Alten Stuttgarter Straße sind als "Spielstraße" ausgewiesen. Seit dem kriecht hier der Verkehr.
Dimitar155 (2021-07-31 17:24:31+00:00): Das macht Sinn. Ich wollte es nur noch einmal überprüfen.
nevw (2021-01-02 04:40:04+00:00): Hi
I think you have deleted part of the administration boundary of Seventeen Mile and Grantham.
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=96718476&zoom=15&lat=-27.49858&lon=152.1872&layers=B000000TTTFT
Scared_Sacred (2021-01-02 05:22:54+00:00): My bad! How would I go about undoing this change?
nevw (2021-01-02 10:56:57+00:00): I used the source import Qld osm data files to merge the section back into OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/PSMA_Admin_Boundaries
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96801399
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=96801399
All seems ok again now  :)
user_5359 (2020-12-31 10:33:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
BCNorwich (2020-12-31 14:36:36+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The path you deleted was never said to be a public path, it was a short section of track (used by agricultural vehicles) outside of the residential property that was used by many folk with no let or hindrance as a path. It was at one time a permissive path under a countryside stewardship scheme. Due to the fact of it being used with no let or hindrance for an extended period, it is in my opinion a public highway. The piece of land in question comprises the track only, separate from residential land at west and the small parcel of land directly east. As for your statement "this is a private path", yes of course it is, all land and paths in England are private, some have public rights bestowed by statute or public use.

Regards Bernard.
user_12328418 (2021-02-21 11:28:47+00:00): Warum trägst du an den Häusern Adressen ein? Sind an den Eingängen ordnungsgemäß eingetragen.
homeExplorer (2020-12-31 12:37:26+00:00): the building burned down in 2019
flohoff (2021-01-06 13:54:59+00:00): Moin,
foot=yes ist default auf fast allen highway= typen - Kann wieder runter.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96720491