piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skyper (2019-12-25 14:28:52+00:00): siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78848738
vehicle=private war nicht mehr aktuell.
Allerdings sind alle Häuser gebaut und primärer Straßenbelag und Trottoirs fehlen.
PT-53 (2019-12-26 09:38:01+00:00): Hallo skyper, 
wenn in diesen Straßen
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=7.82924&lat=47.98828&zoom=17&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways
schon alle Häuser gebaut sind, werden die Straßen (auch wenn der Feinbelag noch fehlt) schon für den Verkehr freigegeben sein. Mit dem Merkmal
construction=minor
sperrst Du aber die Straßen für Navis.
siehe:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=47.98940%2C7.82587%3B47.98685%2C7.83089#map=18/47.98825/7.82876

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=764485#p764485

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
skyper (2019-12-26 13:08:56+00:00): Laut wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction
ist construction=minor der passende Tag. OSMR kommt auch damit klar, wie es in dem Forum auch geschrieben ist und wie es auch auf der Webseite jetzt funktioniert.

Sehe ich iM keinen Grund das zu ändern.
PT-53 (2019-12-26 14:47:35+00:00): Das
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=47.9894%2C7.8259%3B47.9868%2C7.8309#map=18/47.98813/7.82834
nennst Du funktionieren?
Siehe auch:
#https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=765215#p765215
skyper (2019-12-26 15:13:29+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=765215#p765215
Genau da und auch hier
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=765399#p765399
steht doch explizit construction=minor als whitelist.

Das Routing wird hier von anderen Dingen beeinflusst. Ich nehme mal an maxspeed=10. Da ich keine Auswahl zwischen kürzester Zeit und kürzte Strecke habe, muss wohl tiefer gegraben werden.

Wenn Du Dir z.B. das Fahrrad-Routing anschaust, siehst Du, das die Routing-Software wohl so einige Probleme hat.
MKnight (2016-08-29 19:09:57+00:00): Moin, achte doch bitte beim Gebäudezeichnen in Zukunft darauf, dass direkt nebeneinanderliegende Gebäude auch korrekt verbunden sind. 

Habe die "Probleme" soeben korrigiert.
mgpx (2016-08-24 21:13:16+00:00): Hi Gobftald,
this changeset will be reverted due to potential copyright violation. Usage of Google material is not permitted for Openstreetmap edits.

Brg
mgpx
Hjart (2016-08-22 20:18:08+00:00): Bemærk at det er en dårlig ide at anbringe P-noder inden i eksisterende P-polygoner.
Niels Beck (2016-08-23 06:51:55+00:00): Hej Hjart.
Enig. men det er kun tilfældet for et par stykker af de af mig anbragte p markeringer. Jeg tjekker og fjerner og lader resten stå!
Vh.
Niels
maraf24 (2016-08-22 20:21:09+00:00): Reverted.
GinaroZ (2016-08-23 11:41:34+00:00): Hi, there is already a pub at this location named "The Crossed Peels", not sure why you added another. I've removed it.
Neudrino (2016-08-23 14:50:58+00:00): Why shouldn't there be a pub in the other street as well. I have not seen "Crossed Peels" but I have certainly been eating in some pub with label "Whetherspoon" a week ago!
So please leave it in, if you haven't been there personally.
GinaroZ (2016-08-23 15:33:24+00:00): I went past there last month, and originally added the pub :) There is an entrance on both sides, but there is only one pub. I placed it in the middle of the building according to the Bing imagery.

The operator "Whetherspoon" is a chain of pubs - each one has its own name. You can see the name on the outside of the building on their website: https://www.jdwetherspoon.com/pubs/all-pubs/scotland/stirling/the-crossed-peels-stirling
Neudrino (2016-08-24 06:13:49+00:00): Ok than. Didn't notice the other entrance on spittal street, but missed the pub in king street. Only remebered the name witherspoon, probably on the menu or so. Maybe you could place the POI in the middle and add two entrances?
Thanks.
marcioaguiar (2016-08-22 20:13:34+00:00): Raniere, por favor não mapear lugares fictícios ou relacionados a PokemonGO. O OpenStreetMap é um projeto de todos e não serve deve ser utilizado para mapeamentos privados.

Obrigado.
Jongps (2016-08-22 19:18:22+00:00): Ikke noe bra sti
Jongps (2016-08-22 19:17:51+00:00): ikke noe bra sti
Ben Alves (2021-05-26 12:42:59+00:00): Rua A Bairro ibituruna
Ben Alves (2021-05-26 12:43:19+00:00): Rua A
Ben Alves (2021-05-26 12:43:51+00:00): Rua A Ibituruna
SomeoneElse (2016-08-23 11:22:34+00:00): Hi SearchAroundBot,
Please don't add test data to the live OSM database.  If you want to add (and delete) test data, use a dev server such as http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ instead.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
SearchAroundBot (2016-08-23 15:54:53+00:00): Hi, sorry about that. I will try to stick to a dev derver for further testing of SearchAroundBot. I take the opportunity to notify you that the current water location is now correctly placed.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-23 16:49:34+00:00): Thanks.
MrMoehritz (2016-08-23 09:28:08+00:00): Hey Oberpfälzer,

nice work you do there in Togo!
How do you know Djama and Gnagna are suburbs but Houdou and Lom-Nava are Neighbourhoods? When I was in Atakpamé people used all these names the same way.

Viele Grüße
Oberpfälzer (2016-08-25 06:52:12+00:00): Hello MrMoehritz,
thank you for your kind post.
The quarters of Atakpamé are still quite far from complete, because there is a lot I don't know exactly. When I started to map the first of them, I used the neighbourhood tags because of the size (compared with e.g. Lomé). Later I thougt "suburb" fitts better, because most of these quarters in the past (some of them long ago) had been villages of theit own and today have a chef de canton. Lately I had the plan to change every quarter with an own chef to "suburb", but finally didn't realize it, because of my lack of information. E.g. I saw the spelling of the central quarter of Houdou on the homepage of Atakpamé Mairie the way I used it in my name-tag. At the local chef they spelled it with a "V" at the beginning...
So if you know more about it (or you want to "standardise" the tagging for Atakpamé quarters) please feel free to do so. And if you know other quarters with their names, please add a place node at their (at least approximate) position. Thank you for your help!
Vielen Dank!
MrMoehritz (2016-09-09 11:40:18+00:00): Hey,

I adjusted the nodes (see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42022669). But your suggestion concerning the CDQ (Chef de quartier) is good but not realizable from remote.

I don't know any more too. Maybe make some mappingholliday oneday :-). The most popular shold be mapped, though.
Viele Grüße
David Berndt (2016-08-22 18:43:20+00:00): gah. garbage edit.
scai (2016-08-22 18:38:05+00:00): Falls jemand Fehler findet bitte melden. Die Abfahrt A 4 aus Richtung Dresden zur A 9 in Richtung München hatte definitiv ein fehlerhaftes ref gesetzt.

Im Wiki habe ich keine gute/verständliche Dokumentation zur Verwendung von ref und destination:ref an motorway_link gefunden bzw. hat die dortige Beschreibung diverse Abweichungen zu mehreren Autobahnkreuzen die ich mir angesehen habe. Die Komplexität ist reichlich verwirrend finde ich.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-25 17:12:59+00:00): Please don't add test data to OSM.  Although you have deleted some of it you'd left at least https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4361937760/history at latitude 0, longitude 0.
If you want a test server you can use http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org .
whb (2016-08-23 10:42:44+00:00): Falls das wirklich kein Feldweg, sondern ein gemeinsamer Fuß- und Radweg (Zeichen 240) ist, so wäre hier
foot=designated
bicycle=designated
segregated=no
highway=path
angebracht.
gleylancer (2016-08-23 12:06:21+00:00): danke für die info.  zeichen 240 ist dort präsent, ich werde es später abändern.
whb (2016-08-23 10:58:34+00:00): Sicher, dass das ein Radweg ist?
Hier sieht das eher wie ein Feldweg mit Zeichen 260 und "Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei" aus.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=5cREqOZYDWtapyjNcy7_OQ
gleylancer (2016-08-24 16:22:25+00:00): Stimmt. 2 Meter weiter steht allerdings so ein grünes Fahrradweg-Schild mit Richtungspfeil. Was macht man da?
whb (2016-08-23 10:33:04+00:00): tertiary scheint mir etwas übertrieben.
Welche Dörfer oder Gemeinden verbindet denn diese Straße?
Das dürfte maximal unclassified sein.
Marián Kyral (2016-08-23 06:37:53+00:00): Ahoj,
podle wiki by se cesty pod mostem neměly spojovat s půdorysem: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:man_made%3Dbridge

Vím, že se to teď na hlavní mapě nevykresluje zrovna ideálně, ale to je problém renderu, ne dat.

Marián
Roulin205 (2016-08-24 15:33:44+00:00): Ahoj,
o tom jsem nevěděl. Nebyl v tom nějaký úmysl, ohledně renderování, ale šlo mi o to, abych mohl přesně označit úsek, kterému přísluší značka "covered=yes". Půdorysy tedy můžu odpojit, ale ty body tam z předchozího důvodu nechám.
MKnight (2016-08-22 21:12:24+00:00): Ich habe diese "Informationen" wieder entfernt, das sie keinen Bezug/Sinn zum Objekt haben.
MKnight (2016-08-22 21:20:52+00:00): *da
richlv (2016-08-23 04:34:29+00:00): hi there. this changeset added a highly unlikely butcher's shop name of "Ломбард" - i have removed it for now.
if there have been any changes in the shop layout, could you please provide more detail ?
also, mapillary imagery might be helpful :)
Vespucci21 (2016-08-23 13:07:07+00:00): chyba zgubiles jedna ulice
muralito (2016-08-22 22:49:22+00:00): ¿Se llama "Trabajo"?
AgusQui (2016-08-27 22:21:58+00:00): Por favor indique que lineas de colectivos paran .
Derick Rethans (2016-08-23 10:07:51+00:00): The campsite that you added (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4361960492), is that an organised one? Or where you just wild camping?
Supaplex (2016-08-24 11:07:37+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Gustavo de Vargas Dias (2016-08-23 00:37:21+00:00): Parabéns!
Tomio (2016-08-23 10:57:56+00:00): Obrigado Gustavo. Ainda são testes para aprender melhor a fazer 3D.
maraf24 (2016-08-24 16:59:51+00:00): Za szybko ruszasz myszką. W efekcie przypadkowo przesuwasz punkty adresowe.
*Martin* (2016-08-23 14:29:04+00:00): Hello Gobftald

As you have used forbidden source (Google) your changes will be reverted.
AMDmi3 (2016-08-24 12:19:17+00:00): Вы зря исправили дороги в Канищево на service - это всё residential
DimaMashnikov (2016-08-27 07:07:55+00:00): это как скажете,но необходимо выделить в этом районе основную дорогу, иначе навигатор вас поведет по очень жестоким проселкам, проверено на местности.
AMDmi3 (2016-08-27 08:49:42+00:00): Для этого нужно указывать покрытие и качество дороги - тэги surface и smoothness. Кроме того, как service можно отметить куски не являющиеся жилыми улицами и не предназначенные для транзитного проезда. Например

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/296790632 и кусок Дорожной до развилки, левая половина https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131696008.
DimaMashnikov (2016-08-27 08:54:50+00:00): поставьте пожалуйста качество дорог когда будете в этом районе, к сожалению, я не смогу там быть в ближайшее время.
AMDmi3 (2016-08-28 08:29:55+00:00): С большой вероятностью я вообще никогда в жизни туда не попаду :)
DimaMashnikov (2016-08-28 09:35:33+00:00): тогда это не ваша карта, направьте усилия на более интересные вам районы
AMDmi3 (2016-08-28 12:24:22+00:00): В OSM нет "вашей" и "не вашей" карты. Вы ошибочно исправили статусы дорог, исправьте, пожалуйста, обратно.
DimaMashnikov (2016-08-28 13:32:59+00:00): спасибо за ваши указания, завтра же отправлюсь в этот район и соберу информацию о качестве и покрытии дорог
AMDmi3 (2016-08-29 09:12:04+00:00): Спасибо.
joost schouppe (2016-11-09 10:59:26+00:00): Is die hondenloopwei écht zo klein? Of is het een hondentoilet? Want dat is dan eerder amenity=dog_toilet of amenity=potty_area
Van Heddegem Roeland (2016-11-09 15:22:53+00:00): je hebt gelijk. Honden toilet als ik het me nog goed herinner. Pas het maar aan
joost schouppe (2016-11-09 15:29:21+00:00): ok, done. bedankt
luiswoo (2016-08-22 20:34:32+00:00): почему были удалены две улицы?
SanchouZ (2016-08-24 11:37:14+00:00): Потому что их там нет. нет дорог нет съездов. и тд.
luiswoo (2016-08-24 23:19:24+00:00): да ну? https://yandex.ru/maps/238/novocherkassk/?ll=40.067119%2C47.400693&z=17&l=sat
SanchouZ (2016-08-30 19:38:43+00:00): Завтра спецом туда заеду проверю. У яндекса тоже фотки не фонтан кстати ....
luiswoo (2016-08-30 23:58:59+00:00): там только можно выяснить их статус: готовы или в процессе, как здесь http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/47.3560/40.0089
Derick Rethans (2016-08-23 09:52:23+00:00): Please don't tag places for your personal note taking. Not the whole world needs to know that you live here.
*Martin* (2016-08-23 14:29:16+00:00): Hello Gobftald

As you have used forbidden source (Google) your changes will be reverted.
luiswoo (2016-08-22 20:41:56+00:00): это улица, она не может быть служебной, грунтовой дорогой, какой бы узкой и малопроходимой она не была.
luiswoo (2016-08-22 20:51:40+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Additional_rules_to_highway_classification
SanchouZ (2016-08-24 11:57:48+00:00): касаемо ул.Буденовская от Вешенского до  Каретного проезда нет.
Thomas8122 (2016-12-25 10:09:34+00:00): hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/827104 beschwert sich jemand
user_5359 (2016-08-23 03:51:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
Marych_ (2016-08-23 04:29:27+00:00): Подскажите пожалуйста, а адрес какой у вашего дома
Ц14 или другой?
Это необходимо для заполенения адресного поиска
lunafiko (2016-08-23 22:16:15+00:00): Ц-14, Дом 2
lunafiko (2016-08-23 22:23:08+00:00): Вообще, дом конечно могли с тех пор перенумеровать.
Geography Canada (2016-08-25 15:04:36+00:00): "Big house"?
WKOSM (2016-09-07 13:52:47+00:00): Hallo BeKri,
du hast die Leitung  als transformer_tower getaggt? 
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.73780&lat=48.95750&zoom=18&opacity=0.75&overlays=intersection,intersecting_segments
BeKri (2016-09-07 14:40:36+00:00): Nö, weil das war richtigwerweise ein Trafo_tower, aber die "dranhängende Leitung  217625774 wurde von SteveK um 167 m nach NO verschoben, damit gab es dann die Überschneidungen. Hab es wieder hingeschoben.
MosKartograf (2016-08-24 11:30:20+00:00): Обоснуйте, пожалуйста, удаление готового отношения вместо неудачного и более чем неточного старого дубля http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/379365506
Karta01ru (2016-08-29 21:02:58+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:fire_boundary - тут описано так, как описано. Пожарные выполняют по данному тэгу работу. Тем более, что проект ОСМ подразумевает создание объектов на усмотрение пользователей. Не делайте мозг, мне не интересно это обсуждать. Верните всё, как было.
woodpeck (2017-11-02 22:36:18+00:00): Hello wpedmonson, I have removed the "description" again because it (1) contains non-factual advertising text, (2) is incomplete, and (3) might very well violate copyright (since you say you took it from the hotel web site).
stephankn (2017-03-25 11:05:17+00:00): which provider did you use for DigitalGlobe? Was it Bing? so best to document it in this way. Digital Globe sells their imagery to different customers. Only a few of them allowed us to use it for OSM tracing.
Johnny Carlsen (2016-10-29 05:22:06+00:00): Hi Federali,

When you mark roads as paved, you should only add the surface tag to the way, not each individual node.

Regarding the cleanup, I am not sure if there is an easy way in JOSM to remove the surface tag from the all nodes again.
DenisCarriere (2016-09-04 21:40:44+00:00): Cool stuff Undearius. Do you have a live example of Indoor mapping? It would be neat to see the result of this data used in a real world example.
Keep mapping :)
DenisCarriere (2016-09-04 21:50:31+00:00): One comment about the tagging, the doors should be `door=yes` instead of `indoor=door`.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/images/6/63/Indoor2.0_elements.svg
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging
Undearius (2016-09-08 22:26:00+00:00): Thanks for the correction, must've missed it while reading that page. If I'm understanding you correctly, you may be interested in seeing the indoor map of the building.
http://openlevelup.net/?lat=45.348361&lon=-75.755665&z=19&t=0&lvl=0&tcd=1&urd=0&bdg=0&pic=0&nte=0&ilv=0
DenisCarriere (2016-09-08 22:59:10+00:00): Yes this is exactly what I was looking for! :) That's awesome!! Keep up the cool work! I use to go to school there in the T building. Looking forward to see all the floors, I know it's a real challenge doing indoor mapping.
Cheers,
DenisCarriere (2016-09-08 23:19:10+00:00): We have a pretty active OSM community in Ottawa, you should try to attend one of our Meetups.
https://www.meetup.com/openstreetmap-ottawa/
dikkeknodel (2018-05-24 20:24:07+00:00): Hi mtc,
A few months before you created the the Cape Wrath Trail relation I've hiked the southern part of this hike myself. I remember that there are no signposts, so the route is not visibile on the ground. Following the OSM consensus to only map what is visible on the ground, the route relation should not be in OSM. 
Had the route been signposted by August 2016?
Cheers, dikkenkodel
dikkeknodel (2018-05-24 20:26:35+00:00): I meant 2015 actually :).
Pavel47 (2016-08-23 10:47:13+00:00): А причем тут was? Небольшие неточности геометрии не делают объект бывшим.
Supaplex (2016-08-23 03:56:53+00:00): 有店家名稱嗎？
luschi (2016-09-16 18:52:42+00:00): Please stop using name=NK on buildings.
If you dont know the name dont use the name tag. If there is a shop inside, make a extra point and add the information about the shop.
Here a link to find out how to add data to OSM: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
Supaplex (2016-08-24 11:08:22+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
nammala (2016-08-23 03:42:06+00:00): Hi inzhrui,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contributions.. May I know the reason behind deleting the unclassified roads which exists in the imagery.

thanks,
krishna
SomeoneElse (2017-01-18 14:19:24+00:00): This is a personal MAPS.ME note. It is likely not a post office, but the address information may be useful.
nammala (2016-08-23 04:01:53+00:00): Hi inzhrui,

May I know the reason behind deleting secondary roads which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
krishna
nammala (2016-08-23 04:01:21+00:00): Hi inzhrui,

May I know the reason behind deleting tertiary roads which exists in the imagery.

cheers,
krishna
naoliv (2016-10-04 19:22:44+00:00): Andres, não é correto duplicar o mesmo tipo de local, representando ao mesmo tempo com área e com um nó.
Também é útil que coloque uma descrição correta em suas edições, para que os outros mapeadores compreendam o que você está editando.
andresgarcia_am (2016-11-01 03:11:31+00:00): Ok, ciente. Não farei mais esse tipo de edição "duplicada", e daqui em diante sempre detalharei minhas edições. É possível eu fazer isso nas minha edições anteriores (detalhar)?
naoliv (2016-11-01 04:33:53+00:00): Nas edições anteriores só dá para você adicionar comentários (igual esses que a gente está conversando agora).
Alterar a descrição da sua edição não tem como.
Viajero Perdido (2017-01-08 22:24:18+00:00): Hi Dan.

Two polite requests.

1. I had to look at your profile to identify the source of this changeset.  It would appear to be CanVec.  Could you please identify your source in future changesets?

2. I'd like to urge you to stop importing POIs and trails from CanVec, because the accuracy is poor in all my experience.  We have armies of hikers fanning out across the planet now, and they're recording accurate trails and POIs with GPS units.  Once an inaccurate trail is recorded in OSM, it's hard to know if it really exists where mapped without a site visit.

Case in point: you re-added a campsite near Whitehorse Pass that I'd earlier deleted as being an inaccurate CanVec dropping.  I'd already mapped the correct location after a site visit.  Did you not notice it a few hundred metres away?

A hiker relying on the CanVec location of the campsite may have an uncomfortable night...

My throat always clenches up when I see someone importing CanVec in areas I've been working to improve.  Please resist.  I hope you understand.

Thank you,
VP
Edmonton
charrois (2017-01-09 06:38:28+00:00): Hi there.  Thanks for sending your comments and concerns!

I used to do a fair bit of CanVec imports some time ago, but haven't for awhile - and this wasn't from CanVec, at least not intentionally or directly.  Was a mention of CanVec still there in my default comments, without my having removed it?  If so, thanks for pointing this out - I'll have to be more careful next time.

As for the campsites, I was adding what I thought were unmarked ones in rough locations as referenced from a separate paper map.  Somehow I must have missed that the campground you mentioned already existed.

I wanted to add the Whitehorse Pass trails for a hike that I'd be doing (they didn't exist prior) and manually entered campsite and trail information with reference to a paper map... though it's very possible this paper map itself was generated with CanVec data.

In any case, thanks for your comments, and kudos to those walking the trails and mapping them accurately.  There may be some debate as to whether having a trail mapped with potentially somewhat outdated data is better than having the trail not mapped at all - in the future I'll be sure to more clearly indicate the source of data so a better judgment can be made as to its trustworthiness.
Viajero Perdido (2017-01-09 16:33:50+00:00): Hi Dan.

I would think, IF there's not already something mapped (eg already a trail through a particular valley or up to a particular pass), then importing a coarse one is probably okay.  That is, if it's attributed to CanVec or whatever, so someone later can evaluate the validity, as you say.

Our group walked from the hot springs to just shy of the pass, then returned where we came, and we had the valley almost entirely to ourselves on a long weekend.  Nice valley.  From where we turned around, later in JOSM I could see the trail up to the pass from imagery, so I added it all the way to the top.  And it looks like you've completed it down the other side now, an improvement.

BTW, I've added a few campsites elsewhere from JNP-provided coords (Brazeau area), but they're hard to find, and not all together on a single web page.  So I only did Brazeau, and my email to JNP asking for coords to them ALL went unanswered.

Cheers,
Tom / VP
Viajero Perdido (2017-01-09 16:35:24+00:00): I meant, the coords are hard to find.
literan (2016-08-23 12:37:47+00:00): Do not vandal!
nammala (2016-08-24 04:00:06+00:00): Hi  inzhrui,

Reverted the changeset due to the deletions of good edits.

cheers,
krishna
mavl (2016-08-23 17:58:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. После ваших изменений статусов дорог возникли изоляты дорожного графа. Дороги, которые из нескольких линий вы объединили в одну, пришлось снова разделить на отдельные линии.  
Статус highway=tertiary для дороги к военному объекту слишком высок. Вполне достаточно highway=service.