piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MelancholicSlav (2022-06-15 00:56:52+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM! 

It seems that you've both added and deleted a lot elements without stating your sources. Some of the deleted elements are still visible on aerial imagery, which makes me think your editing is perhaps not well-meaning.

Furthermore, continuing to use "Social work" as a changeset description would be unhelpful to other as it doesn't actually explain how you have edited the map data. You should also try to restrict your changesets to a smaller area so they are easier to review individually.

If you do not respond to this comment by 12:00 AM on Saturday, June 18 explaining your mapping activity all of your changesets will be reverted until myself and others understand what you are doing.

Best,
-M.S.
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-06-26 22:05:53+00:00): Er du sikker på at det er maxspeed=40 på Irlandsvej.

Mapillary fra Nov 2021 viser maxspeed:advisory=40.
picht (2022-06-27 07:28:55+00:00): Beklager. Fik rettet forkert. det er ikke denne del af Irlandsvej hvor der er 40 km/t begrænsning
Becky Candy (2022-06-15 08:50:34+00:00): To ensure buildings/highways do not cross or connect, zoom right in and carefully place the building corners. If a road overlaps a building you should feel free to adjust the position of the road before mapping the building. Thank you for mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122386284
philippec (2024-01-31 18:36:03+00:00): Antwerpen Waalsekaai
Geeft deze handpomp drinkwater ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9817892114
diacriticalhit (2025-07-31 17:00:42+00:00): Hi there, where did you find the source for the bicycle system? I couldn't find it by searching and a note in the area is about the bike network.
martien-176 (2022-06-22 18:39:33+00:00): Hi, you requested a review of your mappings here. Thanks, they are of good quality.

One remark, and that is specific for tall buildings. They are often photographed at an angle, showing also the side. You mapped a few of these tall buildings including the visible side. But you should only map the footprint. 

One way to achieve that is outlining the roofprint and then moving that to the footprint.

Again, thanks for mapping.

Kind regards, Martien, validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122387403
Alifo Ruth (2022-10-14 11:24:22+00:00): Thanks for the tip. I would work on it
habi (2022-09-19 10:54:48+00:00): Du hast hier bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/582382152/ `bus=yes`  gesetzt.
Aus meiner Sicht (sehr velofahrend geprägt) ist das Seidenberggässchen von der Thunstrasse bis zur Füllerichstrasse 'nur' ein `highway=cycleway`, nicht?
habi (2022-09-19 10:55:43+00:00): Sorry, nur bis zur Seidenberg-Schulanlage...
dafadllyn (2022-09-22 19:21:59+00:00): Salut!
Sorry für die späte Antwort. Ich kann mich leider nicht mehr genau an die Beschilderung vor Ort erinnern, meine aber, dass das "Gässchen" nicht mit einer blauen Radweg-Tafel beschildert ist und highway=cycleway somit unpassend ist. Gemäss https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Map_Features#Cycle_and_Foot_Ways sollte highway=cycleway nur bei Wegen mit einer blauen Radweg-Tafel verwendet werden (siehe auch die Fussnote).
habi (2022-09-26 20:54:04+00:00): Späte Antwort ist kein Problem, ist ja Freizeit hier.

Das mit dem fehlenden blauen Veloweg-Schild ist natürlich korrekt, wie (meine) Mapillary-Bilder aus der Vergangenheit zeigen, hier östlich nach westlich https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=213568626883991 und hier von der Sternenkreuzung aus nach Osten: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=288069706343102

Etwas verwirrend ist das sehr prägnante Velozeichen, das bis zur Seidenberg-Haltestelle immer mal wieder auf dem Boden aufgemalt ist: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=180839830472658

Aber alles in Allem ist das korrekte Tagging wohl `highway=service`, das habe ich wieder korrigiert.
dafadllyn (2022-10-14 15:28:14+00:00): Sehr verspätet noch danke für deine Antwort! Und danke für deine praktischen Mapillary-Fotos!

Okay, jetzt verstehe ich dein ursprüngliches Tagging. Gelbe Velo-Symbole ohne blaue Veloweg-Tafeln sind schon etwas verwirrend. Jedoch sind Velos so nicht gezwungen, diesen Weg zu benützen (anstelle eines anderen parallelen Wegs), weshalb die Richtlinie auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Map_Features#Cycle_and_Foot_Ways  meines Erachtens schon Sinn ergibt und ich das geänderte (aktuelle) Tagging somit besser finde.

Ähnliche Situationen (also Velo-Symbole, aber keine blauen Veloweg-Tafeln) gibt es übrigens bei einem Teil der Sidlerstrasse (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517489727) sowie der Halen- und Wohlenstrasse (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58536404 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453645540), die derzeit alle nicht optimal getaggt sind.
Ydel (2023-04-18 12:25:42+00:00): Salut Kalepom,
Je vois que tu as ajouter l'attribut power=board sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7102055406/history.
Que signifie ce tag?
Merci
Yann
Kalepom (2023-04-18 12:39:01+00:00): Salut,
ça semble être une erreur de saisie sur le tag. Merci de l'alerte, je viens de l'enlever.
Ydel (2023-04-18 14:45:48+00:00): Merci pour la correction rapide!
Bonne fin de journée,
Yann
user_2066394 (2022-06-16 15:00:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28452162
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201361120
Sind diese Nebenstraßen bzw. Zufahrten tatsächlich alle als Fahrradstraßen ausgeschildert?
skywalkr13 (2022-06-16 15:09:53+00:00): Ist als zusammenhängende Fahrradzone (Zeichen 244.3) beschildert.
user_2066394 (2022-06-16 17:30:54+00:00): Jetzt wird das klarer. Das wäre im Changeset-Kommentar ganz nützlich gewesen.
limes11 (2022-12-19 20:17:11+00:00): Hi,

kannst du bitte kurz hierauf schauen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3434887

Wäre schön zu klären, ob und weshalb dort 30 sind, die Fahrradzone erstreckt sich wohl nicht bis dahin.

Danke, Limes
Friendly_Ghost (2022-06-14 20:52:00+00:00): Thank you for using the hashtag again to comply with the Organised Editing Guidelines. However, in the process you forgot to add a useful comment about the content of the changeset. Please add that as well in the future.

For the relevant guideline, please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
EZRouting (2022-06-27 16:39:13+00:00): Hello, thank you for your comment. I'm sorry for the confusion - we have new employees joining us for the summer and there was some confusion about OSM guidelines. We have reviewed these with our team members again and have updated our settings so we will receive prompt notifications about any comments.
deret (2022-06-21 10:08:19+00:00): Müsste die beschränkung in der Sanderstraße wegen der Sommer-Spielstraße nicht "motor_vehicle:conditional" sein statt "vehicle:conditional"? Zumindest die Pressemitteilung spricht von "für den Autoverkehr gesperrt" (https://www.berlin.de/ba-neukoelln/aktuelles/pressemitteilungen/2022/pressemitteilung.1214512.php), während "vehicle" auch Fahrräder einschließt
Supaplex030 (2022-06-21 10:44:19+00:00): An den Enden der Spielstraße steht eine Sperrscheibe (Zeichen 250: "Verbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art", der rote Kreis), was also für alle Fahrzeuge gilt. Am letzten Wochenende kam ich hier auch vorbei und da standen Sperrzäune an den beiden Enden, sodass man mit einem Fahrrad auch gar nicht durchfahren könnte. Abgesehen von den spielenden Kindern, die sich - zumindest bei gutem Wetter - dann auf der Straße befinden ;)
deret (2022-06-21 10:54:03+00:00): Das ist dann eindeutig, danke! (Habs für die andere neue Spielstraße so übernommen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122661462#map=19/52.48064/13.44038&layers=N)
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:25:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:24:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
ScottNelson (2022-07-11 21:31:13+00:00): I disagree with rating this as "alpine hiking".  Demanding_mountain_hiking seems like the correct rating to me.    Avalanche hazard in winter conditions should not affect the SAC_scale rating for hiking.  Otherwise any summer tail in steep terrain would need to be classified as such.
Quentin Golsteyn (2022-07-11 23:09:25+00:00): Yeah that's fair, I'll revert that edit
ScottNelson (2022-07-12 18:40:48+00:00): Thank you.  Note there's a separate way for the christmas gully ski descent that uses the OSM Piste Maps tags.  However there's no standardized tag for avalanche terrain (yet).  If you want to tag for poor marking then you can use trail_visibility=* to indicate trail visibility separately.  My recollection from hiking this route without snow was that there was a short pathless section at the start through the meadows, but higher up in the gully it's fine.  trail_visibility=bad seems appropriate here.
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:24:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
NieWnen (2022-06-15 09:43:54+00:00): Została notka, że nieczynny.
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:24:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
Korgi1 (2022-06-15 03:51:30+00:00): Just wanted to comment im really glad to see someone adding village boundaries to India, keep up the good work :D
gscholz (2022-06-21 05:06:35+00:00): Hi Clau_Valdez,
your recent edits have added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-57.92987&lat=-27.13707&zoom=16

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122390070

Can you please fix this?
Kins regards
Guido
Glassman (2022-06-15 20:24:55+00:00): #TIP: Under the background icon in the editor different background imagery is available. The ESRI one is more current than Bing's. I used the ESRI background to improve the school outline.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122390112
felipeeugenio (2022-06-15 19:35:50+00:00): HOla Alonso. Pretendes reponer todo lo que borraste? fue bastante
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122390156
salve100 (2022-06-16 02:14:36+00:00): si, estoy reponiendo lo que borre
user_5359 (2022-06-15 09:14:24+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/2160094782 (one of thirty nine nodes). What is the meaning of the tag
deviation = 00°00'
?
gscholz (2022-06-21 05:07:19+00:00): Hi Clau_Valdez,
your recent edits have added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-57.92987&lat=-27.13707&zoom=16

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122390513

Can you please fix this?
Kins regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-06-21 05:06:49+00:00): Hi Clau_Valdez,
your recent edits have added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-57.92987&lat=-27.13707&zoom=16

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=122390622

Can you please fix this?
Kins regards
Guido
PT-53 (2022-07-29 05:13:46+00:00): Hallo Rainero,
nach Deiner Löschung dieser Relation
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10126948/history
ist diese Flächenlinie
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732560341/history
ohne Merkmale übriggeblieben.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Rainero (2022-07-29 06:17:54+00:00): Ja, stimmt. Habe sie entfernt.
VG,
Rainer
mariotomo (2022-06-15 00:05:20+00:00): https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/90002845
(Please don't use the same changeset comment "Actualizacion de los datos" every time - it doesn't help people to understand what you changed or why) (a kind request by a DWG member).
MxxCon (2022-06-15 02:46:14+00:00): Hello.
What is the source of this data? How can this information be verified?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/122391315
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:24:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:24:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:24:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:24:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:24:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:24:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:25:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:25:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:24:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073
porfiriopaiz (2022-06-15 06:08:35+00:00): Hola MorganeTsl.

Procura agregar el acento agudo a los valores de las etiquetas que lo requieran.

He agregado el acento agudo a los siguientes elementos:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9818272233

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9818259764

En el changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122398863

¿Qué distribución de teclado estás usando en tu sistema operativo y en el teclado computadora/teléfono?

En mi laptop uso el sistema operativo en inglés, la distribución física del teclado en Inglés de Estados Unidos, y la distribución del teclado en el sistema operativo es Inglés Internacional con teclas muertas por AltGr.

De manera que puedo agregar acentos agudos a palabras como limón, presionando:

AltGr + o de manera simultánea, lo que resulta en una letra o con acento: ó

Saludos.

Porfirio

Saludos.

Porfirio
woodpeck_repair (2022-10-05 13:24:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127047012, 127047572, 127047231, 127047519, 127047047, 127047385, 127047246, 127047163, 127046775, 127046809, 127047285, 127046680, 127047313, 127047506, 127046753, 127046707, 127046853, 127046666, 127046990, 127046727, 127047067, 127047089, 127047266, 127047545, 127047368, 127046698, 127046953, 127046827, 127047355, 127047489, 127047401, 127046928, 127047029, 127046717, 127047413, 127047299, 127046975, 127046910, 127046687, 127047193, 127047216, 127047446, 127043758, 127047179, 127046740, 127047328, 127046892, 127046789, 127047114, 127047430, 127047463, 127046876, 127047139 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed import of low-quality MS building footprints in Brazil, DWG ticket #2022100510000073