piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-22 09:23:51+00:00): Ciao. La modifica che hai fatto non è corretta. Il transito è consentito solo a piedi e in bicicletta tra le 9 e le 20 ed è interdetto a tutti gli altri mezzi, ad eccezione di quelli di emergenza, come da ordinanza n. 72 del 20/06/2022 della Provincia di Biella: https://servizi.provincia.biella.it/openweb/portal/getDoc.php?f=documenti/27378_Ordinanze_Originale_72_20_1655723721.pdf.p7m&CSRF=930f04bc99f1cd03a22b70eb5c170ad5 . Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126414517
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-22 09:25:19+00:00): Reverted in 126496110
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126414517
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Joker234 (2022-09-20 12:13:58+00:00): I stumbled upon your changeset. In node 9165579672 you used the tag key "phone  no". Is this correct or should it be "phone"? See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone

Thanks for checking.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
ashs_as (2022-09-22 09:47:58+00:00): Hello ilyessem;
I noticed you added the tag "highway=construction without determining the type of this construction.
Link for streets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096240578
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1096240580
In this case, you should add these tags:
"highway=construction"
"construction=reseditional"
 That describes a highway under construction and its type after the construction has finished will be a highway=reseditional.
For more information in Wiki Openstreetmaps:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction
Could you check it and fix it, please?
Regards
ashs_as
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
jpennycook (2022-09-20 10:04:38+00:00): Full changeset comment was:-

Resolved notes made from survey 18/09/2022 - mainly paths still under construction and disconnected from other roads/paths (see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113539998 ) which were tagged as open and pavements tagged with bicycle=yes contrary to signs
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:34:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-20 16:14:40+00:00): Dag Christiaan.. Je vraagt feedback.. access=yes is meestal ook niet correct en veroorzaakt soms ook routeringproblemen in combinatie met andere access=tags.. Je mag overal komen tot er ergens =no staat.
Waneer het openbare weg is dan niet highway=service, maar highway=residential als het een woonstraat betreft.
Ik zal het aanpassen
MVG
eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:19:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:32:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
RicoElectrico (2022-09-20 11:03:50+00:00): Lepiej użyć https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Uwagi jeśli chcesz, żeby ktoś na to spojrzał.
Joker234 (2022-09-20 12:09:08+00:00):  I stumbled upon your changeset. In node 10037595500 you used the tag key "payment:lightning_contacless". Is this correct or should it be "payment:lightning_contactless"?

Thanks for checking.
nathan_day (2022-09-20 12:17:01+00:00): Nice spot, I have updated now!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
ququruzka (2022-10-31 19:39:27+00:00): телеграм канал не є джерелом правдивої (перевіреної) інформації.
user_6110846 (2022-11-05 07:03:43+00:00): приведи мені приклад шо у телеграм каналі було неправильно зазначено назву вулиці
thopf (2022-09-22 21:14:16+00:00): Hallo! 

Die Umbenennung der CvH-Straße soll erst 2024 erfolgen.

LG.
Sebi506 (2022-09-23 10:49:00+00:00): Hi! Habe wegen dem langen Zeithorizont und weil sie ja eventuell auch eine Allee wird meine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht. Den Platz habe ich so gelassen, der soll ja noch heuer passieren. 😄
jcr83 (2022-09-20 16:44:01+00:00): Ste stands for Société, not Sainte !
LOL
BTW, there are many errors in your changeset:
Héliport, not Heliport
Écuries, not Ecuries
Mignonne, not Mignone
Pylône, not Pylone
Gîte, not Gite
Gerbouille, not Gerboouille
Yaaaaaaaa (2022-09-21 09:54:51+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour votre retour! Effectivement j'en ai laissé passer des belles, notamment Ste :-) n'hésitez pas à les corriger. Pour info beaucoup étaient déjà là avant mon changeset, vu que Osmose se concentre sur 1 seule erreur à chaque passe, par exemple la majuscule manquante au début du name. D'ailleurs je vous invite à essayer Osmose, c'est un outil très puissant. Je vous recommande aussi le calque BANO pour ajouter/corriger les rues&lieu-dits. Bonne continuation!
abakus_uploader (2022-09-20 22:31:43+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mcliquid (2022-09-20 11:17:33+00:00): Nice work, thank you for your contribution!
LuxuryCoop (2022-09-26 01:07:38+00:00): 안녕하세요! 오픈스트리트맵에 기여해 주셔서 감사드립니다.
바뀜집합 검토 요청을 주셔서 확인해 본 결과, 문제가 없습니다.
앞으로도 꾸준한 기여 부탁드립니다!
dieterdreist (2022-09-21 21:34:49+00:00): did you discuss this mechanical edit? Your similar edits in Italy have already been reverted by the data working group, please do not remove "crossing" tags from objects.
dieterdreist (2022-09-21 21:37:04+00:00): FWIW, crossing is still the standard tag to describe crossing typology, crossing_ref is not even a sixth: http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/crossing/&***/crossing_ref/
Please revert your undicussed mass edits and respect the guidelines for such edits.
GBAB (2022-09-23 07:08:11+00:00): Lieber dieterdreist,

please look also at this graph:
http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/crossing/zebra&***/crossing_ref/zebra

* * * * *

As far as I can see, for a pedestrian crossing you can use both crossing= and crossing_ref= tags for its attributes.

crossing= refers to the type of the crossing e.g. whether it has a traffic signal or just a marking on the pavement.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing

crossing_ref= refers to the shape of the pedestrian crossing. It was invented for England where there are several shapes of pedestrian crossing (zebra, tiger, pelican, toucan, puffin, whatever). Since in continental Europe each and every pedestrian crossing is "zebra", it has little use but it does not harm either.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing_ref

If you use crossing=zebra, you mix the above attributes. Actually, as the OSM wiki states, "it has gained worldwide usage with the _temporary_ adoption by iD editor", however, as you can see on the above graph, in the last two years its usage almost stagnated (in contrast of crossing_id=zebra).

Thus what I have done was to change crossing=zebra to crossing_ref=zebra. No information was lost but the consistency of the map was improved. I don't think it was dangerous or harming of any aspect.
dieterdreist (2022-09-23 07:52:32+00:00): Please find my answer on one of the other offending changesets: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126418481
APneunzehn74 (2022-11-13 18:13:24+00:00): Ebenso hier, bitte keine Haltestellen verschieben.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
dieterdreist (2022-09-21 13:44:52+00:00): undiscussed massedit
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-22 03:49:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126485899, 126467266, 126475461, 126480683, 126483951 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass edit of zebra crossings in Italy
dieterdreist (2022-09-21 13:44:29+00:00): undiscussed mass edit
woodpeck_repair (2022-09-22 03:49:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126485899, 126467266, 126475461, 126480683, 126483951 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass edit of zebra crossings in Italy
dieterdreist (2022-09-21 13:00:29+00:00): undiscussed automatic edit? Didn’t have a thorough view yet, but apparently removed crossing tags
GBAB (2022-09-21 13:56:18+00:00): I have simply changed crossing=zebra to crossing_ref=zebra. Nothing was removed.
Dino Michelini (2022-09-21 17:48:23+00:00): Da un controllo rapido mi mi sembra che hai fatto molti di più di quello che scrivi...
GBAB (2022-09-21 17:57:31+00:00): Direi di no, almeno non con intenzione. Spero che non abbia rotto nessuna relazione importante o cose del genere…
Dino Michelini (2022-09-21 18:03:34+00:00): Vedi qui https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=126418481#6/42.306/12.675
Dino Michelini (2022-09-21 18:04:31+00:00): e anche ui https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-edits-tile/#13/41.9222/12.3550
GBAB (2022-09-23 06:52:27+00:00): Carissimo Dino,
anche cosi' mantengo la mia posizione che ho cambiato solo i pedestrian crossings. Se i loro puntini fanno parte di strade, allora puo' sembrare che anche la strada stessa sia stata modificata.
GBAB (2022-09-23 07:09:43+00:00): Lieber dieterdreist, carissimo Dino,

please look also at this graph:
http://taghistory.raifer.tech/#***/crossing/zebra&***/crossing_ref/zebra

* * * * *

As far as I can see, for a pedestrian crossing you can use both crossing= and crossing_ref= tags for its attributes.

crossing= refers to the type of the crossing e.g. whether it has a traffic signal or just a marking on the pavement.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing

crossing_ref= refers to the shape of the pedestrian crossing. It was invented for England where there are several shapes of pedestrian crossing (zebra, tiger, pelican, toucan, puffin, whatever). Since in continental Europe each and every pedestrian crossing is "zebra", it has little use but it does not harm either.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing_ref

If you use crossing=zebra, you mix the above attributes. Actually, as the OSM wiki states, "it has gained worldwide usage with the _temporary_ adoption by iD editor", however, as you can see on the above graph, in the last two years its usage almost stagnated (in contrast of crossing_id=zebra).

Thus what I have done was to change crossing=zebra to crossing_ref=zebra. No information was lost but the consistency of the map was improved. I don't think it was dangerous or harming of any aspect.
dieterdreist (2022-09-23 07:44:41+00:00): Dear GBAB, what you call "changing the tag crossing to crossing_ref", effectively means removing the crossing tag. There is no reason to do this, you can add crossing_ref tags to crossings without removing the "crossing" tag.
Generally, all automated edits have to follow the rules set up for this kind of edit, you can find them here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
You have done nothing from this list of requirements, you did not document nor discuss you plans, you simply did it.

I am not interested in discussing usage for the tags, as crossing=zebra still has half a million of instances, and the meaning of crossing=zebra is uncontested, but if we wanted to speak about usage I would emphasize that "crossing" has 6.6 million uses while "crossing_ref" only has 1 million, so if we only could have one tag to describe the kind of crossing, we would probably have to deprecate crossing_ref and retag it to crossing. On the other hand, the tag "crossing_ref" according to the wiki docs does not have a clear documentation, there is a disclaimer on top of the wiki page stating "This article or section contains questionable, contentious or controversial information."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing_ref
dieterdreist (2022-09-23 07:49:39+00:00): Regarding to usage chronology, I invite you to have a look at "crossing": https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/crossing#chronology
(only organic growth) and on 
"crossing_ref", which clearly shows automated tagging operations at least twice (despite none of them following the rules):
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/crossing_ref#chronology

In any case, retagging tens or hundreds of objects, (not to speak of tens of thousands of objects as was done here) without any doubt  requires discussion with the community to see if we want to do it at all.
Dino Michelini (2022-09-21 18:01:24+00:00): https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=126418492#6/42.060/12.563 queste sono tutte le modifiche fatte sotto questa descrizione alquanto vaga. Tutto ciò non risponde a quanto riportato nella Wiki di OSM good practice https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
Joker234 (2022-09-20 12:11:54+00:00):  I stumbled upon your changeset. In way 526399713, 1096261156, and 979774969 you used the tag key "footay:surface:colour". Is this correct or should it be "footway:surface:colour"?

Thanks for checking.
hadhuey (2022-09-21 11:57:38+00:00): It was a typo. Thank you for this hint! 
I already corrected it. 
I search for mistakes like this during the statistic analysis, but this is only done from time to time.
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
DeFra85 (2025-12-31 18:59:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8853174105/history/3
Gibt es dieses Treppenhaus zu den Praxen und Wohnungen auch nicht mehr?
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
mavl (2022-09-23 16:14:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126554992 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: wrong statuses of the roads - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6393].
ivanbranco (2022-12-09 20:16:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10039214066/history

Ciao Andreas, qua hai aggiunto un "Via Adamello", ma la strada è taggata con "Viale Adamello". Tu che sembri avere conoscenza del posto sai qual è il DUG corretto?