piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Anton Khorev (2022-09-26 15:19:03+00:00): Зачем вообще это делать? Не достаточно ли access на воротах? На него вы внимания не обращаете, и там где я специально ставлю foot=yes, вы всё равно потом по всему двору ставите private.
Владимир К (2022-09-26 21:53:36+00:00): в целом достаточно, но и access на дорогах не является ошибкой. в данном случае я, конечно, не досмотрел ворота с другой улицы, да. исправлю и буду внимательнее
Anton Khorev (2022-09-27 08:07:01+00:00): Ошибкой access на дорогах не является, но редактировать становится неудобно. Если я дорисовываю дорогу, то зачем мне думать ещё и о тегах access, когда можно обойтись без них? Заметьте, кстати, что вы написали именно про "дороги". Здесь нарисован ещё и footway через детскую площадку, и на него вы тег access не поставили, непонятно почему. Если вам какой-то валидатор говорит, что ему не нравятся изолированные компоненты графа маршрутизации, то вы тут один компонент (автомобильный) убрали и один (пешеходный) добавили.
GeorgeKaplan (2022-11-27 16:59:49+00:00): Bonjour,

Les lignes électriques sont superposées aux bâtiments et finissent sur certains bâtiments, est-ce voulu ? Je ne les vois pas non plus sur l'imagerie aérienne.
max93600 (2022-11-30 20:32:52+00:00): Bonsoir,
En Alsace (comme en Allemagne), la plupart des réseaux de distribution électrique se font par les toits. Ne pas hésitez à regarder des images de type « Street View ». Ces modifications ont été faites ici à partir de retour de DT-DICT d’Enedis.
GeorgeKaplan (2022-12-03 10:28:36+00:00): OK, merci pour l'information.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-25 07:26:41+00:00): Ciao. Anche in questo caso access=yes non porta alcun valore aggiunto. Su una highway=tertiary possono transitare tutti. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126573415
StefanoAimar (2022-09-25 07:31:24+00:00): ciao Andrea, grazie per il contributo. Sto cercando di creare un percorso in bici su un app che utilzza come base dati OSM e su questo pezzo di strada mi restituiva un errore dicendomi che il segmento non era transitabile dalle bici.. io l'ho modificato nella speranza che questo errore venisse eliminato e, tra parentesi, la strada la conosco bene e so che non c'è nessun divieto/impedimento al transito di una bicicletta. se hai qualche consiglio lo ascolterò volentieri!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126573415
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-25 07:39:19+00:00): Ciao. Grazie per la risposta. Purtroppo il problema non è in OSM ma temo sia nell'app che usi che non fa un buon uso dei dati. Pertanto aprire un bug a loro. Se vuoi provare a vedere se la navigazione in bici funziona, puoi usare https://brouter.damsy.net/latest/# Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126573415
Cristoffs (2022-11-29 16:45:28+00:00): Proszę nie dodawaj obszarów jako relacji, jakakolwiek próba aktualizacji potem to mordęga. Lista błędów walidacyjnych w okolicy przy takiej zmianie praktycznie wyklucza zmiany.
Artek (2022-11-29 17:44:05+00:00): Możesz mi przybliżyć problem, co zrobiłem źle? Edytowałem tam tylko małe odcinki rzeki Pilicy i nie wiem dlaczego zaznaczył się taki wielki obszar. Nie tworzyłem nowych relacji.
Cristoffs (2022-11-29 17:52:21+00:00): Nie chodzi o ten obszar. Znaczy nie tylko o ten. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119268488#map=12/51.2000/19.7647) W tym zestawie Voltarowicz prosił o to samo. Próbowłaem na Twoim terenie poprawić oznaczenia stawu - https://maproulette.org/admin/project/50237 Zmiany powodują uszkodzenia sąsiednich relacji. Jeśli bym chciał zmienić tak zmapowany obszar  np. lasu musiałbym usunąć całkowicie 2/3 relacje i narysować je od nowa. Często sklejasz relacje z drogi co jest niezalecane od kilku lat. Mapuje super dokładnie, tylko Proszę bez tych relacji i megapoligonów.
Cristoffs (2022-11-29 18:00:21+00:00): Widzę, że koledzy już Ci zwracali na to uwagę... Sorki, jeśli truję, jak coś mogę pomoc to poprawić jeśli czujesz się na siłach, bo w niektórych miejscach strach dotknąć ...... zwykle przy takich multipoligonach dotykasz jeden 2-3 się walą ....
NorthCrab (2022-11-29 18:55:02+00:00): Pojawił się pomysł (na Discord) napisania małego programu który łatwo naprawiłby tego typu relacje. Tylko na tą chwilę to tylko pomysł.
Artek (2022-11-30 15:45:00+00:00): Jakby jakiś bot to poprawił to byłoby super. Ja to robiłem w sumie z 4-5 lat temu, gdzieś u kogoś zobaczyłem podobnie, szkoda że wtedy nikt mi nie wrócił uwagi to od razu robiłby poprawnie. :)
Czyli lepiej jak linie się nakładają zamiast mieć wspólne?
NorthCrab (2022-11-30 15:50:04+00:00): Możesz popatrzyć takie rzeczy przy Warszawie, tam zazwyczaj jest wszystko w miarę dobrze otagowane i oznaczone:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.12117/20.91459
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:43:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:52:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
habi (2023-01-05 09:38:57+00:00): Der Guafför ist amigs noch da.
Das 'Al Barrio' braucht einfach dieselben Räumlichkeiten.
Ich hab' das Café als eigenen Knoten erfasst (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10308262945/) und dieses Changeset hier revertiert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130897850).
Gruss, habi
dafadllyn (2023-01-09 20:48:29+00:00): Ach so. Merci fürs Korrigieren.
opendcc (2022-09-25 15:42:12+00:00): Ist leisue=sport_centre nicht ein bischen zu dick aufgetragen für so eine kleine Vereinsbude?
MichaelFS (2022-09-25 15:59:26+00:00): Danke, Du hast recht. Ist korrigiert ...
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
map per (2022-10-24 18:51:56+00:00): Hello MB_OSM,

welcome to OSM!

in osm places should only be either a cafe, a bakery or a pastry, but not all three at once. In edge cases that can get quite tricky. It's up to the mapper then to decide what a place mostly is.
What do you think describes this place best? cafe, backery or pastry?

Best wishes
map per
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:45:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:34:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
aTarom (2022-09-24 11:01:53+00:00): Hola kantares
el uso de
highway=cycleway
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1097455045/history
no parece el adecuado según la wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
y el único miembro de la relación como
role=facil
tampoco
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14616311/history

cualquier duda que no te resuelva la wiki puedes exponerla en el nuevo foro
https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/es/51
o si lo prefieres en el canal de Telegram
https://t.me/OSMes
saludos
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
tuxayo (2022-10-12 19:30:52+00:00): Salut :)
name=* tout seul c'est trop vague.
Il y a deux batiment donc on peut pas vraiment mettre le name sur les deux.

Je crois que addr:housename=* colle bien: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:addr:*

À la place du name=*
Booteille (2022-10-13 17:12:00+00:00): Coucou !

Je te fais confiance. Je l'avais ajouté à l'arrache parce que OSMAnd ne le trouvait pas et je voulais rajouter des infos plus tard... j'ai oublié ! Haha !
N'étant pas un expert OSM, sens-toi libre de faire toutes les modifications nécessaires !
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-24 12:38:52+00:00): Dag Tekko

De tagging die wordt aangeraden heb je juist verwijderd.
highway=raceway for the race way

Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126575386


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Drc_car

MVG
eggie
TekkoTaks (2022-09-24 15:40:19+00:00): Dag eggie,
Ik heb de tagging weer teruggezet. Bedankt voor de melding.
Groet,
Tekko
eggie (2022-09-24 16:49:47+00:00): Top...
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
aTarom (2022-09-24 10:29:27+00:00): Hola kantares, puedes mirarte la etiqueta
""dificult""="blue"
de la vía
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/613656042/history
hay una escala aprobada por la comunidad de mtb:scale que podría ser
mtb:scale=2?

Tienes toda la info en
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mountain_biking

Saludos
Yury Yatsynovich (2022-10-05 16:33:07+00:00): Why did you decide to assign a "town" status to Antopal and Lahisyn?
eggie (2022-09-24 12:35:00+00:00): Dag 78   
Je vraagt feedback.. 
highway=track tracktype=grade2 komt nou niet helemaal overeen met smoothness=excellent
Dat hoort meer bij asphalt. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126576584

Tracktype=grade2 is half verhard. Vaak gravel.. compacted zou natuurlijk ook kunnen. 

MVG
eggie
horst_w (2025-07-18 16:28:31+00:00): Dies ist kein Weg zur Kletterroute. Die Markierung ist eine Grenzmarkierung der Bundesforste. Dieser Eintrag gehört gelöscht.
Langlaeufer (2022-09-24 17:06:55+00:00): Hmm, also ich sehe da in mapillary an vielen Stellen durchaus Radwege manche sogar benutzungspflichtig - auch wenn der Ausbauzustand nicht gerade der beste ist.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126576931
Langlaeufer (2022-09-24 18:51:30+00:00): Wenn ein separat gezeichneter Radweg vorhanden ist bitte cycleway=separate und nicht cycleway=no setzten.
J0N45 (2022-09-24 19:56:45+00:00): Ah ja, das hatte ich falsch verstanden 😅
Wenn ich das richtig sehe, hast du das bereits behoben. Danke!
Langlaeufer (2022-09-24 20:12:19+00:00): Kein Problem, da war noch mehr im argen - nicht von dir ;)
cycleway=no heißt ja quasi ich muss auf der Straße fahren. bei separate gibt es einen Radweg (egal ob benutzungspflichtig oder nicht) . 
Benutzungspflichtig ist dann nochmal eine andere Geschichte, ich bin mir nicht sicher ob das StreetComplete überhaupt kann.

Weiterhin frohes mappen.
J0N45 (2022-09-24 23:28:31+00:00): Alles klar!
Ja, es scheint als ob StreetComplete die Benutzungspflichtigkeit noch nicht abfragt
martien-176 (2022-09-24 13:55:42+00:00): Hi,  thanks for mapping. You requested a review of your mappings. 

Your buildings are well mapped. Good location, square corners and precise outline. 

Only issue is that in a few occasions you mapped a building over an existing building. If that happens your editor can suggest to add a layer tag. In most cases this is wrong. Instead you should move one of the 2 features (building or whatever) out of the way.

Thanks and regards, Martien, HOT validator.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126576943
Leo Slager (2022-09-25 13:16:31+00:00): Aan de Weg naar Rhijnauwen staan de bomen nu in het water.
Zo kun je dat dus niet intekenen.
Dat moet worden ingevoerd als een multipolygoon. Probeer je eens in te lezen in dat soort onderwerpen in de wiki vóór je begint aan dit soort meer ingewikkelde wijzigingen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Multipolygon_Examples
ik ga dat even repareren.
eggie (2022-09-25 13:40:31+00:00): PB gestuurd met het verzoek te reageren...
Groet
Eggie
horst_w (2025-07-18 16:26:46+00:00): Dies ist keine Kletterroute. Die Markierung ist eine Grenzmarkierung der Bundesforste. Dieser Eintrag gehört gelöscht.
berndw (2022-09-24 11:18:36+00:00): This part of the Linzer Strasse isn't a oneway. Please revert this change.

Please do not change anything without a good photo and/or connecting a local mapper

thaks in advance
Bernd

aka
berndw
devasen (2022-09-26 07:28:40+00:00): Hi, Thank you for your reviewing my change set. This is an honest mistake from my end, where I added direction without proper resources. Thanks for highlighting the issue and making the changes, I'll ensure not to repeat such errors again. Looking forward to learn more from you.
Regards,
devasen