piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tom van Dijk (2025-08-06 22:10:17+00:00): Geniaal! Dank je wel voor de inzet. Ik zit hier nu op mijn telefoon vanuit denemarken, dus fijn dat ik het hier niet hoef te doen 😅
user_5359 (2020-02-25 15:52:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
Thomas8122 (2020-02-26 17:34:42+00:00): bitte nicht einfach Straßennamen ändern, nur weil sie im WebAtlas so geschrieben werden https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/CpcfFCIbyiAZa5RucQrltw Btw: dein 'y-Problem' ist immer noch nicht behoben (langsam nervt's)
Ropino (2020-02-26 19:26:44+00:00): Ich habe den Namen zurück geändert.
Bei regio-osm war es auch ohne ' drin. Ist aber wohl die gleiche Quelle. :-(
---
Ich nutze in JOSM die Hausnummer-Vorlage. Dessen Cache haut scheinbar gern mal ein 'y' rein - k.A. warum das immer wieder hoch kommt.
Ich schaue schon regelmässig danach, aber ab und zu rutscht mir was durch.
Thomas8122 (2020-02-27 13:58:55+00:00): Alles klar. Danke
SomeoneElse (2022-01-29 23:13:54+00:00): Hello,
The Esri imagery is offset here.  I've moved https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7242362789 etc. to match GPS and OS StreetView-aligned Bing.
kumarxeq (2022-02-01 06:04:41+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and correcting the edit. Apologies for the genuine miss by our editor for not using best aligned imagery to edit. Thank you once again.
Regards,
kumarxeq

PS: Replying on behalf, as our editor is no longer a part our organization
user_5173844 (2020-02-25 18:06:50+00:00): Hi, thank you for fixing what looks like my mistake.
tux67 (2020-02-25 12:24:38+00:00): ok, jetzt kommt's darauf an wie das vor Ort wirklich aussieht. Wenn alles schon dem Bagger zum Opfer gefallen ist, dann könnten die alten Landuses (Feld, Medow, Forest) einen entspr. Lifycycle Tag bekommen und damit aus der Karte. Wenn alles, oder Teile noch sind wie bisher, dann wären die eher:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse%3Dgreenfield
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81453663
tux67 (2020-02-25 12:25:33+00:00): Ach ja - die Adresse kann aus dem neuen landuse auch raus
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81453663
viloan (2020-02-25 12:10:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
MapMakerGal (2020-02-25 17:31:14+00:00): Boa tarde, benvido á comunidade do OSM en Galiza. En primeiro lugar moitas grazas por axudar. Pódesnos contar que querías facer con esta edición? Xa que vemos que non ten a etiquetaxe axeitada e poder engadir o elemento de xeito que se axeite ás normativas do OSM.
Grazas por todo, unha aperta!
macareu (2020-02-25 17:52:20+00:00): Soy de Ponferrada, estaba intentando hacer una geocerca en el puerto deportivo para posicionar un gps, marque esa zona, pero no se como se hace. 
Si me podeis indicar os lo agradecería.
Un saludo
MapMakerGal (2020-02-25 18:00:46+00:00): Buenas, ¿a que se refiere con geocerca? Explique más los detalles, gracias.
macareu (2020-02-25 18:08:34+00:00): Es una zona de seguridad para un objeto-persona , que cuando sale de la zona envía unSMS para indicarlo
MapMakerGal (2020-02-25 18:27:15+00:00): Buenas, si puede pasarse por nuestro grupo de Telegram de OSM España y lo debatimos más comodamente: https://t.me/OSMes
macareu (2020-02-25 19:46:40+00:00): Ok
!bm (2020-02-25 19:51:50+00:00): Hallo SvenML! 
Bitte mal mit Grundlagen wie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name vertraut machen – ein Blick mehr ins Wiki kann nie schaden, so auch zu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix 
Fixed in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81470872 – happy mapping! --besteGrüße!bm
Polarbear (2020-02-26 22:16:19+00:00): Hallo derclaudius, 
du hast hier die Wiese in zwei Teile geteilt und dabei die Relation (Multipolygon, MP) 227458 gelöscht. Den 3 Innenflächen des MP hast du keine Beachtung geschenkt. 
Es müssten nun zwei MPs gebildet werden, denen 1 bzw 2 der Innenflächen zugeordnet werden. Bekommst du das hin?
eggie (2020-02-25 13:29:39+00:00): Dag svdpot..
IIn het begin volgen we edits van startende mappers. Uiteraard om te helpen.
oneway=yes is correct. Goeie actie. 
Vaak is het zo dat tweewielers zijn uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer. Om het weer te laten routeren heb ik oneway:bicycle=no en oneway:moped=no toegevoegd. Nu routeert het weer goed.
MVG,
Eggie
hu9o (2020-02-25 15:12:47+00:00): Rebonjour, vous avez il me semble oublié de corriger votre tag 'dog' sur l'école dont on parlait ici https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/81418820
hu9o (2020-02-25 15:15:59+00:00): Et pouvez-vous me dire SVP quelle application affiche cette donnée 'dog' ? Je serai heureux d'avoir des références dans ce domaine. Et pourquoi pas contribuer dans ce sens. D'avance merci
CanApp (2020-02-25 15:18:11+00:00): Bonjour,
Etrange, j'ai dû faire une fausse manip', je l'avais corrigé en même temps...
Merci en tout cas pour votre vigilance.

Par rapport à l'application, il s'agit de l'application Can'App.
Grâce à votre commentaire, j'ai vu qu'il manquait notamment des filtres sur les lieux affichés et modifiables via cette application.
Je vais les rajouter.

Merci pour votre vigilance.
skfd (2020-02-25 13:35:37+00:00): Круто спасибо!
PT-53 (2020-02-26 07:23:08+00:00): Hallo Joker234,
diese Linie
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776235176/history
hat keine erkmale.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Joker234 (2020-02-27 19:54:08+00:00): Hi PT-53,
danke für den Hinweis. Da ist mir wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen. Der Way sollte nicht existieren, nur die Nodes.
Grüße
Johannes
literan (2020-02-25 17:10:06+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop=fishing - исправлю
Vascom (2020-02-25 17:34:14+00:00): Ага, спасибо. Я позже увидел этот тэг.
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:33:09+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
map per (2023-09-07 15:24:08+00:00): Hello Mrudul,

your change here is wrong, this section is not a oneway road. What was the source for your edit?

Best regards
map per
Supaplex (2020-06-18 13:59:20+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Hjart (2020-02-25 13:54:08+00:00): I' ve converted all these image tags to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikimedia_commons
mueschel (2020-02-27 11:53:08+00:00): Hi,
you introduced a new tag here, 'access:rsu' - what does it mean?

Jan
Marc Ramírez (2020-02-27 12:00:50+00:00): It defines if the Garbage Collection Vehicles can access
valus (2020-02-25 14:40:04+00:00): Please don't map murky and unrectified buildings. You may use the key "Q" to straighten buildings. If buildings have rectangular and irregular angles https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ could help.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-23 08:56:26+00:00): What is the source of this data?
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-10-21 11:26:50+00:00): Again, what is the source of this data? 

Not all data sources can be copied into OSM - for start copyright must be compatible.

Note also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
wille (2020-02-26 13:37:11+00:00): Hi! Your edit caused some problems here https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=20/-8.09856/-34.88545
It's not safe to realign ways without checking other elements
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81458488
wille (2020-02-26 13:48:40+00:00): It was fixed on https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81506200/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/81458488
FairmountPark (2020-02-27 16:31:49+00:00): Hi wille, thank you for the feedback on this changeset. Will do going forward.
viloan (2020-02-25 14:00:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Thomas8122 (2020-02-25 18:48:30+00:00): Sehr gut. Hab noch name in old_name geändert und die Öffnungszeiten und die Adresse entfernt, damit diese nicht doppelt auftaucht.
Gruß Thomas
bayosm (2020-02-26 05:29:17+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы нарушаете правила оформления. В тег name пишем только названия (официальные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Перенесите текст из name в тег description и исправьте ошибки.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-02-26 13:37:50+00:00): what is the meaning of trace_zoom tag added to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/776251610/history ?

I know that this edit was requested by some mr challenge, but it was rather poor idea at best (note, I requested taking it down at https://github.com/osmlab/maproulette3/issues/1134 )
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-02-26 21:18:47+00:00): OK, I see that you are also author of the MapRoulette task.

Note that OSM is mapping world, it is not for mapping aerial images and this kind of data is really out of scope. Can you remove this MR task?

(obviously, if you disagree - we can discuss it with other OSM contributors at mailing list, Slack or elsewhere)
EditConscript (2020-02-27 01:19:11+00:00): I strongly disagree, let's discuss this over the mailing list shall we?
EditConscript (2020-02-27 05:22:33+00:00): awaiting moderator approval
SomeoneElse (2020-02-27 11:02:41+00:00): @EditConscript If you subscribe to the mailing list before posting I'd expect that the message will appear on the list immediately.  I've just done that with 2 OSM lists in the last few weeks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-02-28 15:39:15+00:00): Where you submitted your message?

Note, if you send it first and subscribed later then it may be a good idea to resend it.
EditConscript (2020-02-29 04:30:21+00:00): Good idea, i'll keep resend. No idea, i'm subscribed already and reply to the topic "cryptic tasks" Thoughts?
kreuzschnabel (2020-02-28 20:58:47+00:00): Hallo trailschneck, ein tourism=alpine_hut ist die Dahlheimhütte nun wirklich ganz und gar nicht, sondern nur ein amenity=shelter, wenn auch ein ziemlich großes. tourism=alpine_hut sind bewirtschaftete Berghütten in ansonsten unbesiedeltem Gelände, in denen gespeist und übernachtet werden kann. Bitte sei mit diesem Tag ziemlich sparsam. Es kann sogar gefährlich werden, wenn ein einsamer Taunuswanderer in schlechtem Wetter anhand deines Taggings davon ausgeht, hier eine warme Mahlzeit und ein Nachtlager finden zu können, und dann nur eine offene kalte Schutzhütte vorfindet.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut
trailschneck (2020-02-29 07:06:14+00:00): Das war unbeabsichtigt. Die Bezeichnung "Schutzhütte" sagt natürlich hier in den Mittelgebirgen etwas anders aus als das was man bei OSM darunter versteht. Eigentlich wollte ich an der Dalheimhütte nur die Zugangspfade korrigieren. Das davon in unserem Gebiet eine "Gefahr" von dem falschen Tagging ausgeht ist aber recht weit hergeholt. Übernachten kann man da auch - ich hab die letzte Zeit schon des öfteren morgens da irgendwelche "Übernachtungsgäste" und Bushcrafter angetroffen. Um vom Ausbleiben einer warmen Mahlzeit ist im Taunus auch noch keiner umgekommen. Erst recht nicht einen Kilometer vor einer Schnitzelranch. ;-)
Gruß Siegfried
kreuzschnabel (2020-02-29 07:18:08+00:00): Dass man da übernachten /kann/, ist mir klar, ich habe auch schon in einfachen Schutzhütten übernachtet, das kann man notfalls auch unter dem Vordach der geschlossenen Schläferskopfgaststätte. Mir geht’s darum, dass die Dahlheimhütte nicht das ist, was das OSM-Wiki unter tourism=alpine_hut versteht, und das ist deutlich enger definiert als „Schutzhütte“ und in deutschen Mittelgebirgen sehr, sehr selten anzutreffen :)
literan (2020-02-25 17:06:15+00:00): Добрый день. Будете добавлять свой сайт вместо официального - получите блок за спам. Все вычищено.
CH1EF Restaurants (2020-02-26 07:25:19+00:00): Добрый день, вообще то сайт ch1ef.ru это официальный сайт ресторанов Meatless и Джонджоли, если Вы откроете любой поисковик и сделаете брендовый запрос, Вы в этом убедитесь... 
Или предложите мне свой вариант официального сайта, даже интересно.
literan (2020-02-26 19:15:55+00:00): мда, похоже, я был неправ. Приношу свои извинения, верну сайт на место
CH1EF Restaurants (2020-02-27 08:03:00+00:00): Ничего страшного, лучше перебдеть =)
valus (2020-02-25 14:40:28+00:00): Please don't map murky and unrectified buildings. You may use the key "Q" to straighten buildings. If buildings have rectangular and irregular angles https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ could help.
thatoneiowan (2020-02-27 10:21:41+00:00): Looks like there are a handful of buildings here that were mapped twice on top of each other. Also, you can easily square the edges of the building corners by pressing Q for a cleaner look.
Jose Luis Infante (2020-02-26 09:39:51+00:00): Hola,

gràcies per la teva contribució, encara que és millor etiquetar els edificis com building=house o building=detached que amb place=isolated_dwelling.

El primer serveix per identificar una casa unifamiliar (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dhouse) i el segon és per habitatges aïllats (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ca:Tag:place=isolated%20dwelling?uselang=ca).

Salutacions!
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-02-25 15:19:38+00:00): Hallo langläufer,

ist ja auch kein echter "Kreisverkehr". Das habe ich schon geändert.
Siehe hierzu auch die Diskussion im OSM-Forum:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68712

Bitte nicht einfach ohne Rücksprache ändern.

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-02-25 15:27:26+00:00): Ups! Verwechslung!
Ich hatte ganz in der Nähe breits ein "Kreisverkehr" angepasst:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8094393

Sorry!
KrzysztZ (2020-05-30 13:33:29+00:00): W tym zestawie uzupełniłeś numery domów w Łące - tyle że dodałeś addr:street=Łąka. Czy tam jest ulica o nazwie "Łąka" ? Znane mi źródła nic nie mówią, żeby tam były nazwy ulic. Jeśli nie ma nazw ulic, to znacznik addr:street jest niepotrzebny, myślę, że powinieneś go usunąć.
Negreheb (2020-02-25 17:00:00+00:00): Servus willisturm, du bearbeitest relativ viel, hier hast du auch den Sankt Peter bearbeitet, allerdings als St. Peter. In OSM sollten nach Möglichkeit keine Abkürzungen verwendet werden, Erklärung dazu ist hier zu finden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29

Vielleicht passen wir das mal an, oder so. 

Beste Grüße
Negreheb (2020-03-03 09:46:19+00:00): Vollständigkeit halber: willisturm hat sich per PN bei mir gemeldet und das erklärt. :)
czubi (2020-02-25 16:46:06+00:00): Du nhast ziemlich vile vorher richtige Sachen umgetaggt, warum? 
Ein Bsp.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dworks
ist eine Fabrik, bei dir ist es eine Fläche an die landuse=industrial gehört.
czubi (2020-02-25 16:50:17+00:00): ist ok ;-) Nehme alles zurück und behaupte das Gegenteil ;-)
Sorry
Allison P (2021-02-12 18:05:37+00:00): Some of the service roads added incorrectly capitalized the value of access=* to Customers. This is not recognized by most data consumers.  Would you mind fixing the value? Thank you!
user_5359 (2020-02-29 07:52:43+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning of the keys. Please have also a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
user_5359 (2020-02-25 18:27:32+00:00): Hello! You overpaint existing highways with a name only way and add this way to a relation. I have revert this changeset because we add existing highways to a relation.
Michaela McGee (2020-02-25 21:26:26+00:00): Thank you for your help! I'll keep a keen eye on this next time.
imnichol (2020-03-08 19:37:05+00:00): And this changeset as well
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-09 01:03:02+00:00): Reverted fully in CS #81936483 #81936443 #81936432
with the comment:
US: Winona: revert in 3 CS of mass deletion in 81462612, 81462607, 81462605, DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-09 01:03:32+00:00): PS: Nothing was imported, just blunt mass deletion
imnichol (2020-03-08 19:36:43+00:00): It also looks like this changeset removed valid data as well
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-09 01:04:06+00:00): Reverted fully in CS #81936483 #81936443 #81936432
with the comment:
US: Winona: revert in 3 CS of mass deletion in 81462612, 81462607, 81462605, DWG Ticket#2020022910000011 
 
PS: Nothing was imported, just blunt mass deletion
imnichol (2020-03-08 19:34:08+00:00): momyr you've removed a great deal of up to date data with this, including basically all of the house tagging that I've done over the years.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-09 01:02:49+00:00): Reverted fully in CS #81936483 #81936443 #81936432
with the comment:
US: Winona: revert in 3 CS of mass deletion in 81462612, 81462607, 81462605, DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-09 01:03:48+00:00): PS: Nothing was imported, just blunt mass deletion
mueschel (2020-02-27 11:49:42+00:00): Hi,
you introduced 3 new tags here, 
  accessibility = 3
  chain_store = 0
 rating = 4.9

What are they supposed to mean?
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
Please make sure that you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor.
GIID (2020-03-02 09:31:11+00:00): Hi mueschel,
thanks for your feedback.
Our company wants to create a global network of innovation districts and Carlton is one of this (to see more, go to https://www.giid.org/). We have introduced new tags and will soon document them. 
So, please, don't make any changes.
Thank you.
mueschel (2020-03-02 12:36:52+00:00): Hi,
did you read the Organised Editing Guidelines?
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/6/62/Organised_Editing_Guidelines.pdf

For introducing new tags, please start some discussion on the mailing lists before editing. nodes
aharvey (2020-03-04 03:30:55+00:00): Hi GIID,

Welcome to OSM. Just bear in mind that "So, please, don't make any changes." is not in line with how OSM works, we're a collaborative project and the data is maintained by contributors, of which any one can contribute or improve upon the data you've entered.

You might also want to see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability, we strive for verifiability and things like restaurant ratings aren't a good fit for OSM since they are subjective and we can't survey them. Where have you sourced these ratings that you've entered from?
aharvey (2020-03-04 12:33:18+00:00): This edit has been reverted due to data sourced from non-free Google sources. --aharvey, on behalf of Data Working Group.
rskedgell (2020-02-26 14:40:40+00:00): The footways which you deleted had access=no, so in what way do you believe they "encouraged" people to walk on electrified railway lines? There are many features mapped on OSM which are neither accessible to the public, nor are they used by routing software. This does not seem an adequate reason to delete those features from the map. You may consider them pointless, other data consumers may not.
TerraUno (2020-02-26 14:54:33+00:00): Unfortunately, I disagree with you. While it may be that these footpaths do not show up on routing software, they certainly do show up on the map, and on other 3rd party maps using OSM as a source (such as Mapbox), which do not distinguish between public and private footpaths. On many maps these just display as regular footpaths, and so to the uninformed user who is not familiar with the technicalities behind OSM it displays as a regular accessible footpath. In addition, these are not even footpaths per say, just areas between train lines. Furthermore, i can not understand what supposed benefit you think having these footpaths on the map has, as supposedly all rail staff that have access to it either already know they can walk there or will presumably have access to information that tells them they can. I cannot find any other examples of paths like this being mapped anyway. Are you also suggesting that we map every single space between railway lines that people can in theory walk along? Or inaccessible footpaths in peoples gardens from their patios to their sheds? It seems a bit of an absurd argument to be honest.
rskedgell (2020-02-26 15:55:58+00:00): If you wish to argue that inaccessible features should not be mapped and should be deleted, perhaps you should raise it on the talk-gb list first?

Your justification for deletion appears to be that they are not displayed as you would wish by some renderers, which could be considered a defect with the renderer rather than the underlying map data. The fact that they are rendered does not cause them to be physically accessible. Again, assuming that someone will be "encouraged" to use a way simply because it is mapped when it is clearly prohibited does not strike me as a convincing one.

It matters little whether you or I consider a feature useful if another mapper has taken the time and effort to map it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146460599 is also inaccessible to the public, would you argue that this should also be deleted?