piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
laurent-38 (2022-07-25 10:07:40+00:00): Bonjour 0 9 9 ™,

Bienvenue sur OpentStreetMap !

Je vous invite à prendre connaissances des bonnes pratiques pour les contributeurs :  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques

En l’occurrence, le point que vous avez rajouter n'est pas tangible (il n'a pas d'existence réel sur le terrain), et je vais le supprimer.

Vous avez peut-être envie d'aller plus loin : la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:%C3%89l%C3%A9ments_cartographiques du wiki est une mine de renseignements. Vous êtes en ville ou vous faites de grandes balades à vélo ou à pieds ? Jetez-donc un coup d’œil à https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Osmecum. Vous y trouverez certainement d'autres idées pour cartographier. De façon plus générale, n'hésitez pas à explorer le wiki, c'est une mine !

    Vous voulez contribuer différemment ? OpenStreetMap France présente une liste d'outils à utiliser en fonction du temps que vous avez, et c'est ici : https://www.openstreetmap.fr/contribuer/

    Vous allez certainement avoir des questions à poser. Après abonnement et lecture, vous pourrez demander sur le forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.fr/) ou la liste de discussion https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr. Il y a aussi des canaux de discussion sur Matrix  https://matrix.to/#/#osmfr:matrix.org, Telegram https://t.me/osmfr, etc. Enfin il existe des groupes locaux se rencontrent régulièrement : n'hésitez pas à les contacter https://listes.openstreetmap.fr/wws/lists#l

    Et pour se tenir au courant des actualités, le compte mastodon de l'association est fait pour ça : @osm_fr@fr.osm.social (ou à défaut, le compte twitter @OSM_FR) ou bien http://www.weeklyosm.eu/fr/archives/category/weekly pour le résumé hebdomadaire.

    Pour finir, ne copiez pas des cartes ou des sources dont vous n'avez pas la licence, la source la plus pertinente est d'aller voir sur place ou d'utiliser l'imagerie satellite de votre éditeur.

    Nous espérons que vous prendrez beaucoup de plaisir à cartographier.  

~~
laurent-38
abakus_uploader (2022-07-13 22:30:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SomeoneElse (2022-07-13 12:05:45+00:00): Oops, wrong account.  Should have been http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SomeoneElse_Revert .
literan (2022-07-13 17:54:25+00:00): но зачем ворота на объездной дороге? через них навигатор не поведет. поправлю
Eugene_C (2022-07-13 19:03:42+00:00): Да ты прав, локальный затуп :)
Eugene_C (2022-07-13 19:05:44+00:00): Поправил
jmaspons (2023-01-15 16:39:34+00:00): És correcte can Corr (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9884985101)? La grafía no és normativa i no he trobat cap altre referència amb aquest nom. Sí que he trobat can Co (https://notib.recerca.iec.cat/2016/10/05/santa-maria-del-cami/)
Strubbl (2022-07-13 16:26:19+00:00): Hi einnutzer72. 
Ist vor Ort schon etwas zu erkennen? siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%9Cberpr%C3%BCfbarkeit
Der Tag railway=proposed ist für diesen Way sicher nicht korrekt oder wird der Zug dort im Kreis fahren?
Wenn vor Ort noch nichts dergleichen zu sehen ist, nicht mal eine Baustelle in dem Bereich, könntest du das bitte wieder entfernen?
Claudius Henrichs (2022-07-13 11:40:44+00:00): Comment should say Chennai instead of Delhi
ssundell (2022-07-16 19:04:12+00:00): Moi! Tuo "Soukokaarenntie" (pieni typo lienee siinä 8)) on ainakin katusuunnitelman mukaan nimeltään Soukonlahdenkaari (https://www.pirkkala.fi/library/files/60a61547475a6c14637c7a08/Katu-_ja_puistosuunnitelma__Soukonahden_alue__hyv_ksytty.pdf)

Lisäksi ihmetyttää, miksi olet merkinnyt pyöräilyn, jalankulun ja hevosella kulkemisen kielletyksi tuolla tiellä? Eikös se ole ihan normaali katu, jossa nuo kaikki ovat lähtökohtaisesti sallittuja?

Jos kyse on rakennusaikaisista rajoitteista, se olisi varmaan hyvä merkitä; kun en ole itse kuin tuosta ajanut ohi, en tiedä, olisiko sopivin tapa esim. merkitä koko katu rakenteilla olevaksi, mikäli se on vielä siinä vaiheessa.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
Syl (2022-07-13 13:45:59+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue, un voisinage est une forme de quartier : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:place=neighbourhood
Si il y a bien une table de pique-nique ici il vaut mieux qu'elle soit sur un point différent.
Syl (2022-07-23 13:52:57+00:00): J'ai remis que c'est un quartier, je vous laisse ajouter une table de pique-nique à part si il en a bien une.
syntex (2022-07-17 21:43:51+00:00): Wycofane
kolasau (2022-07-13 11:59:03+00:00): right tag is #mbx_germany_roads
SK53 (2023-02-24 13:43:47+00:00): Hi,

It's not actually necessary, or desirable, to add names to paths which make up a route. We have route relations which do the same job.

The reason is that most paths don't have a name, or if they do, it is different from the route name (as when the route goes along a named street). I appreciate you don't see the name on the main map on the OSM site, but there are lots of other places where this is shown (such as Waymarked Trails) which are much better suited for walkers.

Jerry aka SK53
SomeoneElse2 (2023-02-24 13:43:59+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!,
Please don't "label" routes like this.  Many of the ways that make up the Pennine Way have other names; many are also part of other routes.
If the name of a route is in OSM, then maps that want to can use that, for example https://map.atownsend.org.uk/maps/map/map.html#18/53.36923/-1.82544
(there the route name is in purple the thing in brackets is the local footpath reference, and the duplicated Pennine Way name in black is the name added in this changeset).
Also see e.g. https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#?map=11.0/53.3745/-1.7819 .
Best Regards,
Andy
PS: any questions, please don't hesitate to ask!
aceman444 (2022-07-15 05:51:26+00:00): Hi, thanks for the update, but please put new rail segments into the corret position into the train route relations. JOSM editor should do it properly, but you are using quite an old version. Please try updating it.
lasagna (2022-07-14 21:33:11+00:00): I have reverted this vandalism in changeset 123626799.
Syl (2022-07-13 13:46:47+00:00): Bonjour, quelle type de route est-ce exactement ?
Nicolas Brouilly (2022-07-13 14:00:22+00:00): Bonjour, il s'agit d'une résidence privée (pas chez moi je précise). Les portails à chaque bouts étaient présents mais pas l'indication voie privée.
Syl (2022-07-13 14:06:06+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour ces précisions. D'après l'historique du chemin, l'accès privé était déjà présent : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235208710/history
Par contre vous avez enlevé que c'est une route. Pouvez-vous corriger ? Sinon je peux m'en occuper.
Et sinon bienvenue et merci pour vos contributions ! N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions.
aceman444 (2022-10-03 19:58:54+00:00): Zdravim, na zaklade coho by tuto smeli jazdit cyklisti po chodniku? Ziadnu znacku som si tam nevsiml.

Co znamena "po role C" vo Vasom popise sady zmien?
Rado209 (2022-10-18 11:06:22+00:00): Zdravím Vás, ospravedlňujem sa za neskorú reakciu.
Bola tu vytvorená relácia, cyklistická trasa a ja som zmenil tuším iba bod kde sa stretá cesta s prechodom aby prenavigolvalo cyklistu po relácii - teraz vidím že pri relácii je nepísané - plánovaná, nechal som sa teda stiahnuť tým že som ju vydel zakreslenú v mapy-cz a nechcelo ma prenavigovať cez spomínaný bod na chodník smer západ a hore na slimák ponad cestu - crejme tiež to je iba chodník a nie C.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-25 14:50:39+00:00): Neither https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_Nigeria_NESP nor https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import_Nigeria_NESP_II_Businesses_and_Amenities_Import work

Where this import was documented?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-25 14:59:49+00:00): Why https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9885082149 has bogus tags?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-09 08:28:32+00:00): ping?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-26 16:20:11+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nigerian_Energy_Support_Programme_(NESP)_II_Businesses_and_Facilities_Import may be matching
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-26 16:21:40+00:00): tried to contact via https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Jeafreezy
LockOnGuy (2022-07-13 12:20:45+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 123506738.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-16 15:19:41+00:00): Please avoid trying to make political points in changeset comments.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-16 15:27:21+00:00): Currently there is some overlap between https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/307763#map=9/25.7442/55.1215 (UAE) and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/304938#map=9/25.9025/55.1842 (Iran) here.
Can you justify that?
Normally OSM uses the "control on the ground" rule for "boundary=administrative" areas, but also allows disputed boundaries to be added too.
Wikipedia thinks that the ground situation is "controlled by Iran" (regardless of claims or who _should_ control the territory).  Can you provide any evidence to the contrary?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
LockOnGuy (2022-07-16 15:40:35+00:00): Hello SomeoneElse,                   

How this differs from Ukraine 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/60199
And Russia
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/60189      
They both overlap in the Crimean Peninsula.     

The current version of the disputed borders is exactly mapped the same as the Crimean Peninsula's disputed borders.

This edit was discussed previously in         
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123455005                 
Then                
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123506738                  
               
Regards.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-16 16:00:05+00:00): > How this differs from Ukraine 
That case was widely discussed within OSM including at board level.  
The general rules for disputed boundaries can be found at https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  That says "Currently, we record one set that, in OpenStreetMap
contributor opinion, is most widely internationally recognised and best meets realities on the
ground, generally meaning physical control".
Do you believe that the UAE has on-the-ground control here?
SomeoneElse (2022-07-16 16:09:03+00:00): The change was in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120185536 .  Unfortunately the changeset comment used there was inaccurate - it says "added disputed boundary for Abu Musa Island, Greater Tunb Island, and Lesser Tunb Island" when in fact the boundary added was _not_ a disputed one.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-16 17:21:44+00:00): SomeoneElse,  I don't see how this differs from the Crimean Peninsula.         
They both mapped exactly the same.     
Russia have physical control over Crimea for the last 8 years, it's still part of Ukraine, while Ukraine has no physical control over it.       
The Arab League (22 Countries) recognizes the 3 islands as part of the UAE, which means it's the most widely recognized. US, UK, France, and most of the international countries demanded Iran to comply and handle this situation in the International Court of Justice, Iran refuses just like the case with the Crimean Peninsula.          
The current situation is that some Arab Emirates locals who live there have UAE passports, they have Arab residents area, they have Arabic schools, they fly the UAE flag on the Island, they say we are UAE citizens, etc...     
The UN doesn't recognize these Islands as part of Iran.       
We can not apply rules to one area and not the others around the globe.         
Regards.
SomeoneElse (2022-07-16 17:29:48+00:00): > I don't see how this differs from the Crimean Peninsula. 
As I already said above, "That case was widely discussed within OSM including at board level".
If you believe that this case deserves to be a similar exception from the normal https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf policy please discuss it on an international list - right now, https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk is probably the best place to do that.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-18 17:17:07+00:00): Hello Andy, sorry for the late reply, I’m extremely busy these days and I guess it’s fine now to change the boundaries from administrative to disputed and remove them from the relation of the UAE so it won't overlap between 2 countries. 
And when I’m free I’ll probably discuss this on the mailing list to see if the international community is okay to change it back to administrative.       
Thank you.
iriman (2022-07-20 13:01:11+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for following up on this issue. I have 2 points on the current situation:

1- "Claimed borders" are still part of "real borders" of some sub-divisions of UAE:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kir
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kit

2- Currently we have 3 set of relations for claimed borders: 
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kiv
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kix
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1kiz
SomeoneElse (2022-07-23 16:21:32+00:00): Yes, generally speaking I'd expect the Ras al-Khaimah and Sharjah "admin_level=4; boundary=administrative" borders to not include places that aren't de-facto parts of the UAE https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1knY , although of course "boundary=disputed" areas for all de-jure parts of the UAE would make sense.
However, I suspect that there are many places around the world where "admin_level=4; boundary=administrative" borders overlap in OSM, because many countries "pretend to administer" areas that they don't control.
user_2066394 (2022-07-13 14:49:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:vending%3Dflowers
nevw (2022-07-14 06:41:02+00:00): Hi
it is preferable to use building=house for houses instead of the generic building=yes
nevw (2022-07-14 06:42:19+00:00): See further info on the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 18:34:13+00:00): Can you be more specific? What errors did you fix?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Msiipola (2022-07-16 13:47:05+00:00): Hej! Jag håller på och uppdaterar alla vägar i det här området. Jag hittar då flera nya service-vägar adderade av dig, som är anslutna med landuse-områden, vilket inte är bra. Fäst aldrig en väg på en multipolygon eller landuse. Vägar ska ligga helt separerade från andra. 
Jag rättar dessa fel allt eftersom jag hittar sådant, men tänk på detta för nya vägar du adderar.
Hälsningar Markku
Harri-Postnord (2022-07-18 12:27:17+00:00): Hej!

Okej!
Jag kan ha missat någonstans, om det satt ihop med "bostadsomr."etc.  om det är landuse-områden?

Jag har sett många vägar som sitter ihop med "bostadsområde" "äng" osv.
Jag rättade en hel del vägar så att de ligger i linje med "vägverket" som satt ihop med ovanstående i detta omr.
Mvh Stefan
Msiipola (2022-07-18 12:56:44+00:00): Det bra att du är uppmärksam på detta. Problemet uppstår i de fall man kopplar en ny väg till en tidigare väg, där den tidigare vägen är ihopklistrad med en multipolygon eller landuse. Då kommer ny väg också kopplas på dessa områden. 

Åtgärden är att först koppla isär område och gammal väg, så att de inte täcker varandra i punkten där ny väg ska anslutas.

Mycket jobb blir det, men det är redan fel från början, vilket man får betala när vägar ska underhållas senare.
btcprox (2022-07-13 14:09:39+00:00): (sorry meant Waterway Sunray)
MxxCon (2022-07-13 20:21:21+00:00): Hello NYMM.
Why did you submit so many duplicates of already-existing POIs?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123564611
ToniE (2022-07-13 13:05:40+00:00): Servus,

es existieren noch ein paar Teilrouten/Varianten ...

Relation Via Bavarica Tyrolensis (Nord) (2071325)
Relation Via Bavarica Tyrolensis (Tegernsee-Ost) (2071327)
Relation Via Bavarica Tyrolensis (Süd) (2071326)
Relation Via Bavarica Tyrolensis (West) (2080238)

VG Toni
ATS_Alpenregion (2022-07-13 13:41:05+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis Toni, ich bin noch dran ;-) Wenn Du noch welche siehst, gerne mitunterstützen! :-)

Danke!
ToniE (2022-07-13 13:48:49+00:00): Ich warte mal ab ...

Lonvias Webseite waymarkedtrails.org mit seinen Varianten für Wander, Radfahren, ...ist ja bekannt, oder?

https://cycling.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=13.0/47.5099/11.7514

VG
Toni
ATS_Alpenregion (2022-07-13 14:01:03+00:00): War mal bekannt, musste aber erst reaktiviert werden - sehr wertvoller Hinweis, DANKE! :-)
eggie (2022-07-13 15:09:02+00:00): Hi Sven Please comment your edits.
I merged the restaurant with the present addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
aharvey (2025-01-08 12:24:40+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078210123/history looks like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dannexe is the defacto tag now
radiotrefoil (2025-01-09 06:00:36+00:00): Good to know, thanks. I'll have a look for the ones I did recently. Any plans for an iD preset?
aharvey (2025-01-09 06:19:46+00:00): lets see https://github.com/openstreetmap/id-tagging-schema/pull/1422 I just want it there so we can translate it as "Granny Flat"
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:10:57+00:00): revertido
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:11:52+00:00): No use el mapa para marcas personales, solo información de relevancia pública.
abakus_uploader (2022-07-13 22:30:53+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
MxxCon (2022-07-13 21:08:46+00:00): Hello again.
Rather than completely deleting this node, it's better to use Lifecycle prefix(as documented at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix) to show what used to be here and that it's vacant now. Or at the very least, delete business-specific info and leave just the address so that the address is searchable and routable. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123565296
Corey Kosak (2022-07-13 21:17:36+00:00): Thank you for this information, and my apologies. Will you be reverting the change? I can try to do the edit again in the way you describe.
MxxCon (2022-07-13 22:43:03+00:00): I restored it in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123583350 so if you can update it with current info.

Also in general when mapping in OSM it's better to try to update existing features with current info rather than delete existing and create new because updating preserves that object's history which sometimes can be useful to referred to.
wkdgs (2022-07-18 13:05:40+00:00): Hi,

bei den Änderungen ist der Tag "start_date=mid C19" verloren gegangen. Kannst du den am passenden Objekt wieder hinzufügen?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123565606
Lejun (2022-07-14 08:37:42+00:00): Attention à ne pas oublier le junction=roundabout dans le cas d’un giratoire. Idem dans ce cas je pense qu’on peut mettre highway=tertiary pour assurer la cohésion de l’Av. A.Zenatti
wkdgs (2022-07-18 13:04:35+00:00): Hier sind auch noch ein paar übriggebliebene "cycle_barrier=*"-Tags.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123566618
wkdgs (2022-07-18 13:03:59+00:00): Kannst du noch die Tags "cycle_barrier=double" entfernen. Die werden ja jetzt nicht mehr benötigt.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123566667
wkdgs (2022-07-18 13:03:27+00:00): Hi,

"access=permit" wird üblicherweise verwendet, wenn eine Parkerlaubnis auf Anfrage auch meistens erteilt wird. Da die hier aber nur Lehrern gegeben wird, müsste hier "access=private" besser passen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123566843
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-17 00:08:19+00:00): Me parece que este usuario está añadiendo puntos personales al mapa.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-03-02 00:43:10+00:00): Reverted by DWG as undiscussed import from undisclosed sources: changeset/133192444
Lejun (2022-07-14 08:39:07+00:00): Au temps pour moi, je vérifie les groupes de modif’ individuellement et par ordre chronologique. Content de voir que Syl a eu les même idées
eggie (2022-07-13 15:04:17+00:00): Dag Wadloper.. Hier klopt iets niet.
Wanneer er nog duidelijkeen highway=track loopt en het niet de bedoeling is dat dit straks dichtgroeid. De track (geschikt voor bv bosvoertuigen.. dus geen path)  zal nog een functie hebben.
Wanneer access=no van toepassing is omdat het staat aangegevn heb je het correct gedaan
disused:highway=path zal dus weg moeten.
Dat kan niet in combinatie met highway=track.

Dus wat is de functie?  
Denk dus highway=track
access=no  indien aangegeven.
tracktype-grade4

note.. disused:highway=path  pas ik alleen toe om te voorkomen dat eenandere mapper op grond van een luchtfoto een pad weer gaat intekenen.
Kijk je nog even?

Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-07-13 15:22:23+00:00): Hier wat leesvoer over paden die er eigenlijk niet horen te zijn en hoe dat aan te pakken..
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73238
eggie (2022-07-13 15:42:12+00:00): disused:highway=path heb ik even verwijderd van de highway=track access=no
eggie (2022-07-13 15:45:01+00:00): Het min of meer verdwenen pad naar het zuiden heb ik ontdaan van highway=path 
Nu dus alleen dusused:highway=path
Dat voorkomt dat het opnieuw wordt ingetekend vanuit een luie stoel mbv een verouderde luchtfoto
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 23:48:50+00:00): Fixed misformatted phone number for SEO POI in changeset 183759467

https://osm.org/changeset/183759467
mueschel (2022-07-23 11:39:48+00:00): Hi,
it seems something went wrong here.

All the nodes have many foreign tags that don't look like they should be in OSM.

I also can't find the required documentation and sources for this import.
eggie (2022-07-13 15:06:58+00:00): Het wandelpad is al getagd met highway=footway  Iets met wielen zal daar niet routeren. Dat is default.

In het kort
een highway=path routeert voor fietsers een highway=footway per default al niet. Het is dus niet nodig bicycle=no te taggen.
Hier wat leesvoer wat de defaults zijn per land
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands 

 
MVG
eggie
archie (2022-07-13 14:46:25+00:00): Hej du flyttade bron ett 10-tal meter åt öster. Inte bra. Om du använder Bing som bakgrund måste du göra en justering först, annars blir det så här galet. Gör så här: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery. 
Bing är känd för att ha en kraftig offset. Så ritar ingenting förrän du har gjort en justering.
hmpx (2022-07-13 15:19:08+00:00): Okej, bra att veta! Om positionerna återställs, är taggarna rimliga? Tänker ffa på cykelbarheten av de norra stigarna, att bron har trappor på vardera sida samt att man måste korsa ett stengärde nära Pojkebovägen.