piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ovruni (2020-09-06 04:10:52+00:00): Hola, he notado que has estado utilizando la etiqueta building=yes [0] como etiqueta para diferentes areas que no son edificaciones, sin embargo esta etiqueta está destinada para edificaciones individuales. Además, tal como lo comenté en el conjunto de cambios 90435072, por favor utilizar la etiqueta place=city_block [1] para etiquetar las manzanas.
Si tiene cualquier consulta sobre como editar puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://telegram.me/osmPe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:building
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:place%3Dcity_block
user_8466505 (2020-09-06 02:26:48+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thank you for improving the building details around your neighborhood! We really appreciate the detail. Keep it up!

Thanks,
TheAdventurer64
SomeoneElse (2020-09-06 14:02:33+00:00): Hello,
Please use a more meaningful changeset comment rather than just simply "roads".
Best Regards,
Andy
Fluffy89502 (2020-09-25 18:33:21+00:00): Sorry about that. Will do in the future.
olehz (2021-01-16 12:22:20+00:00): https://i.imgur.com/OdecJAV.png - молодець. наімпрував знатно
opencarpatia (2021-01-17 19:25:10+00:00): паси гусей, хамло
olehz (2021-01-17 20:21:31+00:00): На майбутнє будеш знати, як повчати інших "правильно" говорити, замість того аби лаконічно пояснити відверто хренову правку.

У своїх правоцлавних спільнотах вітайся як хочеш і встановлюй цензуру на слова типу "нафіг. Головне, аби дороги перестав гвалтувати. Цей міст я виправив,   виправлю з часом й інші "покращення"
user_5359 (2020-09-06 05:48:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/5795786261/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
user_5359 (2020-09-06 05:50:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1838367198
lyctkel (2022-07-23 15:12:08+00:00): Hi Johnny Mapperseed,
I guess you meant building=house at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/753141705.
Kind Regards,
lyctekel
Johnny Mapperseed (2022-08-04 06:29:49+00:00): Sorry I just saw this. That's a good catch, and correct! Thank you for your help! :)
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-06 13:20:20+00:00): Hi taucoin125, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several mapped drive ways? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=90467945

If a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
blackboxlogic (2020-10-09 03:09:48+00:00): Hi, I saw your note about the bridge. I can remove it. Can you confirm that the bridge is gone and that vehicles can no longer cross at this location? Can bikes/pedestrians cross still? Are there plans to put a new bridge in its place soon?
-Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90468021
GeorgeTToad (2020-10-10 12:27:20+00:00): The bridge was completely removed a few years ago. You can use a boat or wade across. Would be tough to bike. I've been told by close residents that the town has no plans to replace the bridge. It was a minimally used bridge and the cost to replace would be high. I have not spoken to the town to confirm. I can send photos if that helps. All traces of the bridge are gone.
blackboxlogic (2020-10-10 19:24:17+00:00): Done.
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-06 13:20:45+00:00): Hi taucoin125, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several mapped drive ways? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=90468316

If a way is not accessible to the public, add the access=private or access=no and don't delete the way.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
literan (2020-09-07 20:46:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7880233135/history#map=18/55.88199/37.77179 т.е. тут достаточно сказать "Мне на биостанцию" - и пропустят на машине?
skquinn (2020-09-06 05:05:39+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

These are good first edits, though the opening_hours tag does have a specific syntax that needs to be followed for it to be able to be consistently read by the software that uses it. I have made the fixes on the two Amtex locations you have edited, which you can use as examples. Specifically, times are in 24 hour format and two-day weekday abbreviations are used. For full details you may refer to <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours>.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 22:03:31+00:00): removido
b-jazz (2022-02-09 17:03:04+00:00): Hi Cdurant,
What's the purpose of the "small patches"? They aren't correctly mapped as they are a patch of fairway inside a larger patch of fairway, so it makes no sense topologically. If there is an alternative purpose of the patches (maybe they are yardage markers or something), then they need to have different tags. Please let me know. Thanks.
b-jazz (2022-03-12 02:38:12+00:00): Never heard back so I went ahead and deleted these. Guess it will remain a mystery.
that_dude (2021-08-26 23:05:08+00:00): From the wiki: "A rest area is place along a road, usually a motorway or dual carriageway, where a driver can stop to have a rest" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Drest_area)

The one you added are mainly located along paths and tracks, are you sure this is the right tag?
user_5359 (2020-09-06 05:41:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/2814286134/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 13:45:21+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Mike Raust (2020-09-07 15:31:33+00:00): Great works, but smaller changeset please
naveenpf (2020-09-22 10:32:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90469692
user_5359 (2020-09-08 05:32:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of hole_num.
naveenpf (2020-09-16 01:42:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90470107
user_8466505 (2020-09-06 07:45:25+00:00): Your land? What do you mean by that?
Thanks,
TheAdventurer64
naveenpf (2020-09-16 00:54:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90470239
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:19:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90470256
nevw (2020-09-07 07:49:14+00:00): Hi
I noticed that this bit was displaced.
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=153.04232&lat=-27.47811&zoom=18
naveenpf (2020-10-30 15:18:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90470353
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-01-01 00:52:23+00:00): This edit has been reviewed and partially reverted due to unexplained deletion. Features deleted already exist, but replaced by low-quality ones.
Otenkiya (2020-09-20 15:20:01+00:00): 梁川口内トンネルの現道区間（way53354591) は地理院地図では国道のままですが、いつ自治体管理に変わったのですか？　また、Bingで区別できたのはなぜですか？
Mochikini (2020-09-20 16:04:52+00:00): 県報、市告示を確認しましたが、私の確認ミスでしたので修正しました。
OptikalCrow (2022-04-07 17:47:18+00:00): Hi, I have some questions about this changeset. Why did you add a park here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844694794

What are these floating bits of amenity=college? Where did you get the boundaries for them? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844694807 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844694806

What is this amenity=college? Operator? It doesn't look like a campus to me... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844694809

I also don't think this should be a park, especially not the administrative offices. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844694811

What is this park? Where did you see it? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844694814
chickpeas (2023-04-23 19:46:06+00:00): The https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844694809 parcel—according to the Albemarle County GIS (https://gisweb.albemarle.org) for the address 1085 LYMAN MANSION RD—is owned by the University of Virginia Foundation, which handles real estate acquisitions for UVA. That explains why the area was designated with amenity=college (College Grounds), but of course just because the UVA Foundation owns a property doesn't mean the property is part of the UVA grounds. This property clearly is NOT a part of the UVA grounds and the way should be deleted.
dufekin (2023-08-28 22:50:05+00:00): The "floating bits" of "amenity=college" came from the "Virginia property lines" overlay in Open Street Map.  The "park" (since deleted) was a property that City of Charlottesville owns with no obvious structures or use.  It shows clearly in the city's gis viewer in the same color as other parks.  
https://gisweb.charlottesville.org/GisViewer/
OptikalCrow (2023-08-28 23:06:54+00:00): Hi there, thanks for the response. My concerns are that you are importing parcels without verifying things beforehand.

Are you certain the data found on the Charlottesville GIS portal is public domain? While it may be hosted openly, we still need to verify we are allowed to use and import it.

Secondly, OSM should be as much of an "on the ground" map as it is of legal parcel ownership- blindly adding parcels without regard for what is actually on the ground might be a tempting shortcut, but you end up with things I and others have brought up with tagging combinations that don't make sense, weird geometry, and misleading data. 

If I go to a plot of land that is labeled a park, I expect a park to be there- not a patch of forest that is technically owned by the city that they colored as "the same color as other parks" but is really just a legal distinction. And certainly not a wastewater treatment plant (like on other changesets you've done!)
maxerickson (2020-10-03 16:00:58+00:00): The children's hospital is located on the Hartford Hospital campus, but I think including it inside the area for the hospital takes it a step further and implies that it is part of the hospital.

This sort of thing isn't well represented in OSM yet (the hospital and campus are distinct entities in reality and the same object in OSM).
eggie (2020-09-06 07:36:03+00:00): Yep.. 'goeie actie'.. Dat waren nog oude 3dshapes.
Gr eggie
naveenpf (2020-09-16 02:15:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90471315
eggie (2020-09-06 07:48:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.


Naam gecorrigeerd van "Toeristenootd" naar 
Toeristenoord Venbergse Molen
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2020-09-07 03:06:50+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён. Пожалуйста, смотрите https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90484340
limes11 (2020-09-06 07:42:31+00:00): Mit dies war Note 2336245 gemeint.
geow (2021-02-25 21:41:55+00:00): Wie kommst du darauf, dass dies bewirtschaftete Berghütte ist.

What makes you think this is a managed mountain hut?
geow (2021-02-25 21:46:34+00:00): There is definitely nothing like that here, not even a shed.
geow (2021-02-26 20:05:36+00:00): Fixed: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100072627
mavl (2020-09-07 03:16:03+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён. Пожалуйста, смотрите https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90484340
malcolmh (2020-09-06 11:37:05+00:00): These areas should have the tag: seamark:type=cable_area.

cable_submarine is the tag for actual cables
pitscheplatsch (2020-09-06 13:24:22+00:00): Hi HudaHfidh, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several objects, which are still visible in the satellite imagery? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
HudaHfidh (2022-01-06 10:36:50+00:00): this is because of my mistake, I don't really understand openstreetmap I deleted it first for fun, now I understand and even confirm in several locations, this is the location where I live

I'm really sorry, and sorry again for really late answer
HudaHfidh (2022-01-06 10:37:52+00:00): Sorry for my english tho, i mean i did fixing in some areas that i delete at that time
literan (2020-09-07 20:38:13+00:00): motor_vehicle=destination означает, что вы подъезжаете на машине и говорите охраннику "Мне нужно в офис № N" - и он тут же вас пускает, любую машину. Ну здесь же не так.
solenoid jam (2020-09-08 09:56:56+00:00): А такси не в счет? Они проезжают на территорию гостиницы.
 
Или может тогда лучше motor_vehicle=customers?
literan (2020-09-08 10:02:21+00:00): access прописывается для обычной, средней машины. Так-то для машин с мигалками везде access=yes.

motor_vehicle=customers значит что любого клиента любого магазина на территории беспрепятственно пропустят. Мне кажется, это тоже не то. 

motor_vehicle=private это обычная практика для офисных центров
literan (2020-09-08 10:03:31+00:00): вообще, destination ставится когда висит знак "Баранка" (движение запрещено, но тем кто там проживает, или работает, или везет груз можно). Т.е. это самое мягкое из ограничений
literan (2020-09-07 20:33:40+00:00): зачем тут access=private, если уже стоят foot=yes, bicycle=yes, motorcar=private? зачем вносить противоречащие теги, чтобы навигаторы и люди, пользующиеся картами, путались?
pio2_122 (2020-09-06 08:28:12+00:00): Wycofane: tagowanie było prawidłowe (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Pozosta.C5.82e_drogi).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90472116
pio2_122 (2020-09-06 08:28:14+00:00): Wycofane: tagowanie było prawidłowe (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Pozosta.C5.82e_drogi).
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90472121
TagaSanPedroAko (2022-01-01 00:52:57+00:00): This edit has been reviewed and partially reverted due to unexplained deletion. Features deleted already exist, but replaced by low-quality or duplicate ones.
eggie (2020-09-06 08:37:03+00:00): Dag Jorn... Je vraagt om een review.
De juiste tag moet zijn historic=memorial

Di niet monument
monument in het Engels is geen equivalent van ons monument.
In het Engels betekent monument iets anders. Denk aan de Taj Mahal in India.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial

Pas je het aan?

MVG,
eggie
Kovoschiz (2020-09-06 09:17:10+00:00): Please don't draw individual lines for mini-roundabouts. They don't have physical separation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90472718
eggie (2020-09-07 18:53:53+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90472871
mavl (2020-09-07 03:14:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён. Пожалуйста, смотрите https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90484340
eggie (2020-09-06 09:12:56+00:00): Denk alleen dat je beter description kunt gebruiken ipv inscription.
Voor inscription de letterlijke tekst nemen.

en verder evt 
memorial:type=
zie 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:memorial:type
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2020-09-06 09:13:46+00:00): Lijkt me oke zo..
gr eggie
user_507893 (2020-09-06 08:53:32+00:00): Quelle: Bing Luftbild
fkv (2020-09-06 09:31:15+00:00): Da stimmt was nicht. Auf der Dürren Wand gibt es keine Falkensteinhöhle, und die Links gehen zur Einödhöhle, die wieder ganz woanders ist.
eggie (2020-09-06 09:38:11+00:00): Dag bouwpakket.. Waarom foot=no op een G13 fietspad. Dat lijkt me niet correct.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90473420
De kaart kan toch beter routeerbaar blijven .. ook voor wandelaars?

Kijk nog eens naar je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90473420

Wat is je bron dat je op de highway=track  niet mag fietsen? Op de highway=path zou fietsen verboden kunnen zijn.. maar... 
Staat daar werkelijk een bord Verboden te fietsen. 

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-06 09:39:35+00:00): Waarom op sommige highway= track  bicycle=designated. Dat is niet correct. 
designated gebruiken we in een hele andere context.
eggie (2020-09-06 09:42:50+00:00): Het beste kun je bij ingrijpende wijzegingen contact op nemen met de oorspronkelijke mapper van de MTB routes.
Dat is Multimodaal. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/multimodaal
MVG,
eggie
bouwpakket (2020-09-07 18:50:16+00:00): Bedoel je deze met het G13 fietspad? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109434315#map=18/52.08673/5.27240
Het is een fietspad met 2 meter ernaast een wandelpad.  

Die designated is dan inderdaad fout. Kan jij die corrigeren?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55726020
eggie (2020-09-07 18:53:23+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90473420

Ik kijk zo even...
eggie (2020-09-07 18:57:57+00:00): foot no verwijderd. Dat g13 pad loopt ook met een haakse bocht daar is geen wandelpad naast. Het zou anders niet meer routeren.
eggie (2020-09-07 19:00:13+00:00): bicycle designated van track verwijderd
eggie (2020-09-07 19:00:44+00:00): Dat die paden waar je niet mag fietsen op slot staan is natuurlijk wel oke.
eggie (2020-09-07 19:03:21+00:00): 'k Vraag me wel af of foot=no op die voor ruiters bedoelde paden klopt. Staat er wel een bord voetgangers verboden?
bouwpakket (2020-09-07 19:03:48+00:00): bedankt voor je hulp!
bouwpakket (2020-09-07 19:05:41+00:00): Dat van de ruiterpaden weet ik van de boswachter, Utrechts Landschap wil graag de recreatiestromen scheiden. Ze zullen alleen niet bij alle paden een bord hebben staan. Daarom had ik het erbij gezet. Er liggen meer dan voldoende wandelpaden naast in dit gebied
eggie (2020-09-07 19:12:09+00:00): No problem..  De mtb mapper mediamodaal tagt de mtbpaden met bicycle=designated met verder nog een boel andere tags die verwarring met reguliere fietspaden moet voorkomen.
Je hebt daar nu permit van gemaakt en dat lijkt logisch want je hebt hier een vignet nodig.
Alleen permit is voor iets heel anders bedoeld.
Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access%3Dpermit
Het is bedoeld voor National parks waar je je moet melden en weer afmelden.
Dus ik heb m'n vraagtekens bij je mutatie vandaar dat ik had voorgesteld dat je met Multimodaal contact opneemt.
Zal Multimodaal even vragen om te kijken. Hij kent het gebied en was de voorgaande mapper.

MVG,
eggie 

.
bouwpakket (2020-09-08 06:29:22+00:00): Als jij hem wil vragen graag
eggie (2020-09-08 06:43:14+00:00): Multimodaal heeft toegezegd om contact met je op te nemen...
Mvg
Eggie
bouwpakket (2020-09-08 07:28:25+00:00): thnx
phaerrax (2020-10-02 16:27:30+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! :-)
This changeset spans a _very_ large area: it is strongly advised not to do this, since it uselessly notifies a lot of users from different regions or countries which have nothing to do with the actual location of the edited data. It would be best to "keep the changeset local", i.e. not to include changes which are far away from each other or do not have much in common.
This way, the changes are easier to assess for other users in the community ;-)
ottwiz (2020-09-06 09:48:33+00:00): Also, added some wooden areas
alphensebezorger (2020-09-06 12:08:28+00:00): Hallo Eric,
Ik vermoed dat door het doorverbinden van de wegen de wandelroutes beschadigd zijn geraakt. Als ik nu de route Kozakkenput bekijk, zie ik geen ‘rondje’ meer, maar zitten er allerlei uitsteeksels aan (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5806380). Ook Zeisterbos 1 heeft van die uitsteeksels. Zou je daar nog eens naar kunnen kijken?
Vriendelijke groet, Alphensebezorger.
naveenpf (2020-09-16 01:54:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90473694
fkv (2020-09-06 09:36:32+00:00): Du hast irrtümlich die Höhle als Endpunkt des Weges gelöscht. Dabei ist ein Weg mit nur einem Node entstanden – ein böser Bug, der den Entwicklern des Editors (iD) gemeldet werden sollte.
bergradler69 (2020-09-06 10:00:40+00:00): ja bitte melden - ich hab das nicht ganz irrtümlich gemacht - es gab eine Info, dass die Höhle ein eigenständiges Objekt sein muss, was ich versucht habe zu machen
fkv (2020-09-06 10:27:58+00:00): Wenn ein Weg, der zu einer Höhle führt,  eine Fehlermeldung auslöst, dann sollte dir als mitdenkendem Anwender schon klar sein, dass die Fehlermeldung ein Blödsinn ist und der Fehler nicht in den Daten, sondern im Editor liegt.
Hier gibt es also 2 Editor-Bugs: 1.) die Fehlermeldung, 2.) dass der Editor zulässt, dass Ways mit nur 1 Node entstehen.
Um diese Bugs den Entwicklern zu melden, bin ich nicht der richtige, weil ich diesen Editor nicht benutze. Das kannst nur du selber machen oder jemand, der sich mit dem Editor iD auskennt und den Fehler reproduzieren und beschreiben kann (was muss man genau tun, dass das passiert, usw.) und ggf. dann auch den Bugfix testen kann. In den Bug-Meldungen kannst du natürlich gleich mal diesen Changeset als Beispiel anführen.
VitalieS (2020-09-25 21:02:03+00:00): Bună.
Vila Dorului s-a deschis unde se afla anterior Hotel Laguna? Hotel Laguna și-a încetat definitiv activitatea?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/90473765
mavl (2020-09-07 03:13:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён. Пожалуйста, смотрите https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90484340
literan (2020-09-07 20:29:35+00:00): добрый день! для подъездов более точный тег entrance=staircase. Я исправил.
mavl (2020-09-07 03:12:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок отменён. Пожалуйста, смотрите https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/90484340
eggie (2020-09-07 18:50:03+00:00): De ze kan ik niet meer terugdraaien.. Te veel conflicten
eggie (2020-09-07 18:52:19+00:00): Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=90474138