piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-05-14 20:49:01+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Deze bijdrage heb ik teruggedraaid, want niet erg geloofwaardig. Wat is je bedoeling?
Dit was je edit. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85220038
MVG,
Eggie
Speirs (2021-03-26 11:25:14+00:00): Ahoj, na základě čeho jsi přeložil cyklotrasu 352 v Rokycanech z hlavní cesty na Břasy směrem na Svojkovice?
LukasJerabek (2021-03-29 16:41:59+00:00): Ahoj. Před těmi 11 měsíci mapy.cz i cykloserver.cz to vedly na ty Svojkovice. Dnes koukám, že mapy.cz to mají už zkráceno po silnici 232 tak jak bylo v roce 2018 plánováno. Vrátím ji zpátky.
Speirs (2021-03-29 17:09:17+00:00): Tohle už jsem řešil před čtyřmi lety. Nechápu, jak si někdo dovolí obšlehnout cizí mapy. Správně pokud vidíš rozdíl v mapách, tak se sebereš a jdeš se tam podívat. Uvedomuješ si, že třeba mapy.cz mají schválně chyby v mapě, třeba vedou trasu o jeden blok vedle a pak je jasné, kdo kopíroval, a kdo to skutečně prošel? K čemu je potom nějaká trasa v mapě, když ani není dobře vedená?
eggie (2020-05-14 20:20:03+00:00): Dag Baakie.. construction=yes kun je ook verwijderen.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85220476

De club zou je ook op de adresnode kunnen bijtaggen ipv op het gebouw zelf. 
Kijk even in de wiki hoe een watersportvereniging te mappen. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2022-09-30 16:18:02+00:00): Svp de adresnoxdes intact houxden en geen adresinfo aan de gebouwomtrekken toevoegen. 
Aan adresnodes geen building=yes toevoegen. Dat geeft foutmeldingen.


MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-30 16:22:15+00:00): Adresnode hersteld. 
Je hebt de adresnode gebruikt om er iets anders van te fabriceren?
GinaroZ (2020-05-14 22:21:01+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits. Does the path you added connect to the end of Maroney Drive? 
Also, I don't think the node here is a mini roundabout? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7519491753
betanik (2020-05-15 07:44:08+00:00): It does. I'll revise this bit. Thanks for the comment.
user_2066394 (2020-05-14 21:28:53+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85221009
CENTER STEEL 110 (2020-05-25 16:02:40+00:00): مرکز استیل ۱۱۰
Protoxenus (2020-10-02 08:52:26+00:00): Du bist sicher, dass diese Straße Anton-Maksrenko-Straße heißt? Ist das so ausgeschildert?
Stefan Ribeiro (2020-10-08 21:49:41+00:00): Statt dem S kommt ein A hin. Es gibt da zwar kein Straßenschild, doch am Zaun des Kindergartens steht es richtig da.
Truchin (2020-06-02 13:50:12+00:00): Ave

T'es sûr qu'elle est à double sens cette piste cyclable provisoire ? J'ai l'impression que ce n'est pas le cas sur la majeure partie du parcours autour de la porte Maillot.

Thomas
Florimondable (2020-06-02 15:16:36+00:00): effectivement
maraf24 (2020-05-14 20:37:23+00:00): Już wycofane.
Mammi71 (2020-05-14 20:27:58+00:00): "Nutzerwunsch" ist gut, war schließlich ein grober Fehler, der revertiert wurde. Trotzdem danke.
streckenkundler (2020-05-14 20:35:29+00:00): Och mit Nutzerwunsch meine ich dich :)... Ich weiß immer nicht auf die Schnelle, was ich schreiben soll. Eigentlich war ich gerade  fertig mit der nächsten Runde Knotenpunktnetz Dahme-Spreewald und wollte ins Bett... (Psst: ein Link wäre das nächste mal nicht schlecht) 

Alles gut... :) Sven
Mammi71 (2020-05-14 21:34:14+00:00): Oh, den Link vom changeset hatte ich schon im Zwischenspeicher, hatte nur das Einfügen vergessen, weil ich noch was anderes ansehen wollte.
Ich werde dann mal noch die Fehlermeldung schließen.
user_2066394 (2020-05-14 21:30:28+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85222229
mvo (2020-05-15 06:53:29+00:00): Danke wurzellast. Das klingt gut. Ich schaue mal wie ich das Rückgängig machen kann. In diesem besonderen Fall wird das Freibad allerdings nie wieder eröffnet werden. Ist aber vieleicht trotzdem interessant es noch auffindbar zu haben.
mvo (2020-05-15 07:18:13+00:00): Danke nochmal - ist rückgängig gemacht und disused: verwendet.
user_2066394 (2020-05-15 09:07:25+00:00): einwandfrei :-) gutes gelingen weiterhin
Tomas Straupis (2020-05-15 04:06:22+00:00): You do not speak samogitian, so please do not duplicate/copy samogitian names to OpenStreetMap from other sources. Such duplication are very bad from IT perspective. Do not ruin languages you do not speak.
Jay May (2020-05-15 10:11:11+00:00): I actually copy them from Wikidata, itself fed from Wikipedia!
Tomas Straupis (2020-05-15 13:32:32+00:00): I know, so do not do that. You're not adding your knowledge to OSM, you're doing secretarys work by blind copying. It is harmful to OSM. Why? Consider two scenarios AFTER you copy paste the data:
Scenario 1) somebody uses OSM data and finds an error, he finds the incorrect „translation“ in OSM so fixes it there. Therefore he does not fix wikidata, so all other users who are doing correct thing from IT perspective - using wikidata - do not get the correction.
Scenario 2) somebody finds an error and fixes it in correct place - in wikidata - OSM data is not updated, those using OSM data directly get incorrect values. And I could go on and on. In IT it is called „denormalisation“. You've already obliterated Polish names so I've lost any hope creating Polish map of Lithuania using OSM data. But I do have plans to make Samogitian name map someday, it will only be possible if you DO NOT copy paste and generally do not change tags of languages you do not speak.
Warin61 (2020-05-16 05:39:49+00:00): Hi,
Two problems with this change set. 
Relation 11101137 - scrub has duplicate segments. 

Relation 11101134 has a member whose role should be inner.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=117.08008&lat=-33.66698&zoom=12
Warin61 (2020-05-22 09:32:37+00:00): I note that these problems are still present and you continue to map. Please fix these problems.
Warin61 (2020-08-20 07:14:35+00:00): Still present and still mapping.
Ottonormalverbraucher (2020-08-21 05:21:47+00:00): I think, with [https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89722153#map=16/-33.6635/117.0955 changeset 89722153] the problem is solved.
Warin61 (2020-08-23 09:11:52+00:00): Relation 11101134 has 2 outters... still an error. 
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=117.13789&lat=-33.67798&zoom=15
Ottonormalverbraucher (2020-08-23 11:39:32+00:00): done, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11101134
km2bp (2020-05-14 21:55:24+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85223167&zoom=18&lat=52.06172&lon=15.70176&layers=B0TTTFT Ryzel 2 w rzeczywistości ma taki przebieg jak ja go narysowałem na podstawie śladu GPS ma rozwarstwienie na 2 odnogi które potem się łączą. A oto mój ślad na którym bazowałem a do tego jeszcze w edytorze można włączyć nakładkę ze zdjęciami Mapillary   https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/km2bp/traces/3297502  Kategoria ścieżka moim zdaniem powinna być zmienna na droga dla rowerów rodzaj nawierzchni grunt oraz dopisek MTB w nazwie własnej wtedy wszystko jest jasne.
maraf24 (2020-05-16 19:54:03+00:00): Zestaw ten jako niewątpliwie usuwający prawidłowe dane zebrane z terenu został przez mnie wycofany.
MarcoR (2020-05-16 09:49:02+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto! Molte volte in realtà sono le immagini satellitari a non essere allineate alla "realtà"; lo sfalsamento di solito è di qualche metro però nelle zone collinari o di montagna peggiora; quelle più affidabili dovrebbero essere le PCN2006 che però oltre ad essere vetuste, spesso non si caricano.
trigpoint (2020-06-07 16:18:03+00:00): Please do not duplicate names.

In the case of schools the name should be on the campus only, the building should be tagged simply as building=school.

Cheers Phil
Twenty Mile Bison (2025-03-27 15:53:52+00:00): Where does the name Hatchery Creek come from? According to CanVec, this is labeled as the upper reaches of the Nicomekl River.
BC Hiker (2025-03-29 14:30:08+00:00): Township of Langley GIS:
https://geosource.tol.ca/
(This is the official City website)
Mark R Naird (2020-05-14 21:40:27+00:00): Dear Karito,
have you noticed the useless "NUMBEROFPROJECT"?
What's the source of this import?
eggie (2020-05-15 06:39:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Connecticut (2020-05-15 05:33:36+00:00): added.
Verlauf geraten.
maraf24 (2020-05-26 20:31:45+00:00): Tego adresu tu nie ma, to śmieć z wyburzonego budynku.
PerplexingPenguins (2020-05-15 22:54:11+00:00): Looks like you've also added one house in Eagle. In general, we try to keep changesets localized to a smaller area, as it makes them easier to review
KrzysztZ (2020-10-21 12:53:47+00:00): Witam,

tutaj chyba nie ma mostów:
openstreetmap.org/way/803903657
openstreetmap.org/way/803903655
openstreetmap.org/way/803903659
aweech (2020-05-15 15:50:52+00:00): Hi, just letting you know that Magna is an incorporated metro township. I changed it to admin level 8 to match the other 2 metro townships that have been added to OSM so far. Happy mapping!
stevea (2020-05-15 16:24:38+00:00): Very kind of you; thanks much!  And happy mapping to you.
stevea (2020-05-15 16:26:05+00:00): As an aside, to be consistent with other states that put townships at admin_level=7, shouldn't 7 be the correct value for Utah's five metro townships?
aweech (2020-05-15 16:36:29+00:00): I think it's better to be consistent with the rest of Utah's city boundaries which are at admin_level=8. The metro townships have fewer powers than cities, so if there's any deviation they should be at admin_level=9.
stevea (2020-05-15 16:41:22+00:00): Yes (and I don't want to start an argument), metro townships do have fewer powers, but they are not cities, which is what 8 denotes in Utah.  In fact, Wikipedia says "A metro township is a type of municipal government in Utah equivalent to a civil township."  As OSM calls US civil townships 7, it seems slam-dunk easy to say that they get 7.
user_5359 (2020-05-15 05:01:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your objetcs please have a deeper look on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
pitscheplatsch (2020-05-15 10:02:12+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85226222
nevw (2020-06-04 08:13:41+00:00): Hi
you seem to have mapped paved and other areas and boundaries of land blocks using the tag highway=path. This is not a conventional method of mapping and unable to be used in a useful manner by those using the OSM database.
Do you wish to remap to fix these edits?
user_5359 (2020-05-15 04:50:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Short comment to the new key "water is on" on https://www.osm.org/node/1830468886. Other country use access:covid19 instead.
pitscheplatsch (2020-05-15 10:02:38+00:00): partly revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85225986
VictorIE (2025-05-27 03:32:55+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803922099

You have "fixme=sewage or fresh water?" here. It would seem that the idea is to reprocess waste water for industry, e.g. as coolant for a power station. https://www.durban.gov.za/storage/Documents/Public%20Notices/Public%20Notices%202024/September%202024/Water%20Reuse%20Communication%20Booklet.pdf
user_5359 (2020-05-15 04:48:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short comment to the new key "Water Open in COVID SiP" on https://www.osm.org/node/7519925125. Other country use access:covid19 instead.
maraf24 (2020-05-19 21:28:01+00:00): OSM to nie jest baza danych urzędowych. Proszę nie przenosić mechanicznie danych z takich baz do OSM. Odcinek posiada taką nazwę dla ciąglości nazewnictwa dla obu kierunków jazdy.
maro21 (2020-05-22 23:42:14+00:00): Nie ma ciągłości nazewnictwa w wielu miejscach we Wrocławiu, ten odcinek to nie jedyny przypadek. Teoria ciągłości nazewnictwa? Co jeszcze wymyślisz dla pseudoargumentacji swoich edycji? Tagowanie pod render?
maraf24 (2020-05-23 10:50:33+00:00): W *miarę możliwości* ciągłość należy zachować. To się przydaje dla nawigacji. Tak, to jest tagowanie pod nawigację, ale to akurat w osm robimy (np. łączniki dróg) i to nie jest tagowanie pod render.
Tutaj jest jedna droga, która jest rozdzielona wysepką. Dobrze to widać na GSV. Dlatego przy takich krótkich odcinkach wskazane jest dodawanie nazwy. Jak się obejrzy drogi w innych miastach i krajach to jest to powszechne rozwiązanie. SIP tutaj nie pomoże, bo on nie uwzględnia takich niuansów - tj. krótkich odcinków, a czasami nie jest aktualny.
Widzę tu tylko jeden problem - część tak nazwanej drogi byłaby w innej miejscowości. Na takiej sytuacje jest jednak tag addr:city dodawane do drogi.
user_5359 (2020-05-15 04:45:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag building:levels=0 means that the building has no height above ground level. If you want to indicate that your shop is located on the ground floor, the tag level=0 is the correct tag.
Polarbear (2020-05-15 23:54:03+00:00): Du löschst hier eine Brücke, um sie leicht verändert neu zu zeichnen. Dabei vergisst du, die Straßen-Nodes mit dem Brückenumriss zu verbinden, vorher war das der Fall. Die Datenqualität hat sich also insgesamt verschlechtert.
user_2066394 (2020-05-15 09:18:50+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85228497
müllers (2020-05-15 16:22:41+00:00): Hallo wurzepeter,
entschuldige bitte diesen Fehler. Habe versucht diesen POI erneut herzustellen.
Bist du so einverstanden? 
Ich wünsche ein schönes Wochenende
muellers
user_2066394 (2020-05-15 16:53:32+00:00): einwandfrei, hab jetzt noch das disused:-präfix dazugegeben
mein hinweis war mehr eine anregung für zukünftige bearbeitungen :-)
gutes gelingen weiterhin
bopoh13 (2020-05-28 11:19:30+00:00): hazard=contamination
contamination=anthrax
landuse=cattlegrave
ks1v (2020-05-28 16:42:12+00:00): Попрпаил, спасибо!
aharvey (2020-05-15 05:08:25+00:00): I see you added access=no + motor_vehicle=yes to https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/410251553 unless the road is closed I think that top level access tag is best left unset. motor_vehicle=yes is not harmful to tag, but is usually assumed by default so most of the time not really necessary. Which specific from/to points were you noticing the routing issue?
minus34 (2020-05-15 06:58:31+00:00): Thanks for the corrections Andrew. I didn't realise "Allowed Access - All" in the openstreetmap.org website editor was an override flag.

My issue looked like a connectivity issue, however the OSM data was good. I subsequently discovered the "GPS" data I had was showing (in)accuracies > 200m. This caused Valhalla to map match a route that connected the on ramp to a local street. In short, my data caused it - not OSM.
Baloo Uriza (2020-05-15 02:36:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 85229869 where the changeset comment is: Removing due to nonexistent fords being added.
Baloo Uriza (2020-05-15 02:35:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 85229838 where the changeset comment is: Removing due to nonexistent fords being added.
Baloo Uriza (2020-05-15 02:30:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 85229769 where the changeset comment is: Removing due to nonexistent fords being added.
mariotomo (2020-12-07 19:58:10+00:00): pero qué pasa? tienes prisa? de qué?
mariotomo (2020-12-07 19:57:11+00:00): cuando puedas, por favor mira si quieres mejorar la geometría de tus contribuciones al mapa.  eres mapero de experiencia, esto que estás añadiendo ¡es terrible!
Alvarado2510 (2021-01-21 23:21:01+00:00): Buenas, se que no se acerca a la realidad, lo que sucede es que recuerda, que trabajamos con imagen de hace mas de 5 años de retraso, cuando edite aquí, lo hice con las imagen de bing del 2015 (aproximadamente), ahora contamos con imágenes nuevas y mas frescas a la realidad, ahora nos toca corregir.
mariotomo (2020-12-07 19:45:27+00:00): qué pasó en este conjunto de cambios?  todos los edificios que dibujaste son de 9.2m×14.7m, pero en las fotos aéreas la readlidad es otra.  tienes prisa?  en menos que 1 minuto (desde el conjunto de cambios anterior) 21 edificios?  porqué?
mariotomo (2020-12-07 19:46:58+00:00): what is going on here? all buildings you contributed are 9.2m×14.7, whereas the aerial images tell a different story.  are you in a hurry?  this changeset holds 21 buildings and follows by less than a minute your previous one.  why are you doing this?
user_5359 (2020-05-17 06:53:20+00:00): Hello! Short question to https://www.osm.org/way/447075947: Could it be that the correct tagging is
addr:housenumber=6525
building=yes
name=RG Next
office=company
?
IsStatenIsland (2020-05-19 06:30:47+00:00): I like to think of the easements as road beds. You shifted them from layers -2 to -1. They should essentially be at the same layer as the lowest object.

Any thoughts?
clay_c (2020-05-20 18:29:51+00:00): Ah, good point. Do what you want with it - I'm gonna be taking a break for about a week to help with family stuff
IsStatenIsland (2020-05-22 03:43:12+00:00): All done, back to layer -2.
mariotomo (2020-12-07 19:53:39+00:00): no se entiende la razón de producir edificios que no corresponden con la realidad.  estás dando la impresión de que el lugar está bien mapeado, cuando no es así.
user_6771650 (2020-05-15 03:16:49+00:00): Great work!
aharvey (2020-05-15 04:54:17+00:00): Hi I noticed you deleted https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/80951861 and replaced it with a new way, if you could try to retain existing objects to keep the history that's best. For now I'll restore back the original way and add your tags so the history can be maintained.
Wynndale (2020-05-15 07:35:45+00:00): Why?
aharvey (2020-05-15 04:36:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/507279778/history which business do you need to be a customer of to use this car park? If it open to the public to use then it should be access=yes, access=customers means only people here for the shop/cafe/pub/etc can use the car park.
aharvey (2020-05-15 04:46:55+00:00): By the way, crossing=marked is a duplicate of crossing=uncontrolled https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing "Duplicate of crossing=uncontrolled, i.e. a crossing with road markings, but no traffic lights." so there's no reason to need to change from uncontrolled to marked.
DP24PH (2020-05-15 12:52:04+00:00): 1. Arrowhead changes from -> to →
2. [NEW] #AntoninaLine bus route (Guinobatan → Araneta City)
3. [FIX] Certain roadways within Downtown Guinobatan per latest Presidential directive on roadway recovery
ma-rt-in (2020-06-13 12:41:30+00:00): Hello,
the thing you changed on the one was good before. But it would be even more gratifying if you knew what exactly is signposted on site. What feedback did you get from your driver?
hemasvn (2020-06-15 05:41:01+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for  checking into our edits. We have received the feedback from our driver that the road is accessible by motor vehicles, cross verified the same with the available resources and made the edit. We are not sure of the exact sign board, we left a note to the community asking for the additional improvements if any. It will be really helpful if the local knowledge can validate our edits. please, suggest the required modifications. Always happy to learn form the community.
Baloo Uriza (2020-05-15 13:42:11+00:00): Kinda feeling like Lake Hefner Parkway north of Kilpatrick is a trunk because of the intersection at 164th.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85234993
compdude (2020-05-17 01:22:43+00:00): Nope, that's not standard practice in OSM in the US, that's just your personal opinion. I haven't seen anyone else besides you insist on tagging this way.

There are many 3-digit interstates shorter than this freeway that are tagged as a motorway; by your logic these would all have to be trunk. 

Please provide some proof (e.g. talk-us discussion, wiki page) indicating that there is consensus for your way of doing things.
ovruni (2020-05-15 09:02:10+00:00): Hola
Gracias por tu interés en editar en OSM.
En esta edición se ha modificado varias edificaciones añadiendo nombres descriptivos, estas edificaciones ya contienen la etiqueta con clave "building:use" que brinda información similar para dichos objetos, además el uso de nombres descriptivos es desaconsejado[0], por tal motivo se han retirado dichos valores en los nombres descriptivos. Para cualquier consulta sobre como editar puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Per%C3%BA#Comunidad
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions
nevw (2020-05-15 05:58:11+00:00): Hi
you have entered every tag except the most useful primary one that informs us what it is.
office=company or craft=painter ???
czubi (2020-06-12 12:46:39+00:00): Hallo heldz, schau bitte mal in die note 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2225285#map=19/50.89271/10.43215&layers=N
Du hattest die Höhe im CS von 559m auf 860m geändert, u.a..
czubi (2020-06-12 12:48:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7518651483#map=19/50.89308/10.43188&layers=N

hier
heldz (2020-06-12 12:50:14+00:00): jup. Die Kletter-Tags von einem anderen Felsen kopiert und offensichtlich den Höhen-Tag mitgenommen. Hab's zurückgesetzt.
user_2066394 (2020-05-15 09:20:41+00:00): geschlossene geschäfte am besten mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85238160
Flurps (2020-07-29 21:50:47+00:00): I have been reviewing your changesets from this area a few months ago, the tagging is poor and inconsistent. Needs access tagging corrections and addition of gates and such to be worth it. Some residential roads you have added are private serviceways.
Zaculeu (2020-07-30 18:23:14+00:00): Hi Flurps, thank you for the feedback. I’ve reviewed my changesets in this area for the mentioned issues and made some updates including reclassification of residential roads that should be private service roads and added barriers where I could see them in imagery. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88747315
simulator1 (2020-05-16 12:55:46+00:00): Pozdrav,
koliko se sjećam službeni naziv je onaj skraćeni: 
https://www.zagreb.hr/en/ulice-i-trgovi/13075. 
https://geoportal.zagreb.hr/karta
Treba odabrati neki drugi tag za puni naziv: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
LP
Hannifin Parker (2021-02-12 00:05:37+00:00): Are the boundaries of these woods really justified by Maxar imagery? Have you compared Maxar Premium and more sources?
Frans S (2020-06-29 16:54:19+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
I cam across your mappings on this location.
You mapped the trace of a small river and tagged it as a tertiary highway !. 
This trace was already mapped and tagged as a river.
Please make the correct decisions in recognizing traces like this.
I remove these mappings.
Best regards and keep mapping
user_5359 (2020-05-15 15:27:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
westis (2020-05-20 15:22:00+00:00): Gott jobbat! Kan tipsa om att använda Strava Heatmap som bakgrund för stigar. Det gör det möjligt att kartera stigar som folk springer och cyklar på mer detaljerat. Se https://youtu.be/DAjpGdyLvkc
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85241548