piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aquarix (2019-11-10 21:33:10+00:00): Hello hjasuer,
I haven't been on this island, yet but what you entered as "name=" is surely not the real name. This is more like a description.
Additionally in a foreign country you should use the local language for the "name=" tag. Otherwise you should use a language suffix like "name:de=" or "description:de=" if you don't know how to write in the local language.
Third: you always should give a short summary about what you've changed. E.g. in this case: added a bakery.
See this Wiki article for further information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Regards aquarix
mavl (2019-04-09 16:17:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:17:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:17:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:17:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:17:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:17:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:17:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
scai (2016-07-29 20:42:53+00:00): Can you please at least use English changeset comments when editing in Germany?
MKnight (2016-07-29 22:03:36+00:00): scai: die englische Beschreibung findet sich auf der wikiseite.

dieser CS hier ist übrigens weitgehend identisch zu einem revert im Februar: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37478950 mal schauen, ob/was da kommt. 

Die Daten hier sehen nach 5 Stichproben allerdings schlüssig und ok aus.
didier2020 (2016-07-30 03:39:09+00:00): fix (ways or nodes) Duplicated geometry and tags/values 
issues is from a personnal osmose analyser ("official" osmose analyseur detect duplicated geom error only for way at this time)
you can see fixed issues there:
http://dev.osmose.frontend.dirif.info/en/errors/done?country=germany*&item=1230&class=3

for the changeset/37478950, there was errors when i've used validator josm
scai (2016-07-29 20:42:50+00:00): Can you please at least use English changeset comments when editing in Germany?
didier2020 (2016-07-30 03:44:24+00:00): fix nodes with duplicated geometry and tags/values 

you can see fixed issues there:
http://dev.osmose.frontend.dirif.info/en/errors/done?country=germany*&item=1230&class=3
(for a few day)
user_5359 (2016-07-30 18:34:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think you live in the middle of a street. Please move the node to the right side of the way.
Geography Canada (2016-07-30 17:15:31+00:00): Please fix: Why does West Bank include Gaza?
Geography Canada (2016-07-31 01:32:11+00:00): Fixed.
user_5359 (2016-07-30 18:32:41+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don’t delete existing streets, add the tag access=private.
Huub Briels (2016-07-29 19:58:51+00:00): Heiigenberg is een typo, moet natuurlijk zijn Heiligenberg..
muralito (2016-07-29 22:02:51+00:00): Juan, la marca/bandera va en "brand" no en name.
Juan Palma (2016-07-29 23:41:49+00:00): Yo lo edite desde maps.me y no aparece la opción brand, por eso lo puse en el nombre, la unica opción parecida es operador pero ahi va el nombre dr la empresa que justamente opera esa estación, no la marca. Por favor si podés editalo vos porque yo no se como hacerlo. Gracias..
muralito (2016-07-30 02:37:08+00:00): Si, la solucion pasa porque maps.me muestre el brand, deje buscar por el, y/o modificarlo, etc. Ya quedo. Gracias.
user_5359 (2016-07-30 15:46:53+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! kennst Du schon den Bonner OSM Stammtisch? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bonn/Stammtisch Der nächste Termin ist am 16.08.
chnav (2016-10-12 09:38:21+00:00): Откуда взялся этот погранпереход ? Его отродясь не было, может только для приграничных жителей; сделал запрет на проезд
Gazer75 (2017-02-20 11:07:00+00:00): Please do not edit with Bing in Norway unless you know what you're doing.
House number nodes should never be moved, these are imported from the Norwegian Mapping Authority and have high quality position. They can actually be of great help to see if Bing is bad.
maraf24 (2016-07-31 10:33:16+00:00): Reverted.
Endres Pelka (2016-07-31 13:44:37+00:00): jhill93, YOU are not necessary.
FTA (2016-07-30 00:56:24+00:00): Hi Man77,
I noticed you've been adding a lot of wikipedia=de:* tags to objects in China. is there a reason you are using the German tag for Chinese objects? From the wiki tag page (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia?uselang=en-US): "only provide, in normal circumstances, a link to a single Wikipedia article, which should be to the article in the primary language for the subject." Secondary languages are suggested to be tagged as wikipedia:de=*.
Best,
Ethan aka FTA
---
Maschinenübersetzung

Hallo Man77,
Ich bemerkte, Sie haben eine Menge hinzugefügt wurden von wikipedia=de:* tags, um Objekte in China. gibt es einen Grund, dass Sie das deutsche tag für chinesische Objekte verwenden? Von der tag seite im Wiki  (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia?uselang=en-US): "die unter normalen Umständen einen Link zu einer einzelnen Wikipedia-Artikel, die auf den Artikel in der vorherrschenden Sprache für das Thema sein sollte." Sekundäre Sprachen werden vorgeschlagen, um als markiert wikipedia:de=*.
Am besten,
Ethan aka FTA
user_5359 (2016-07-30 18:28:08+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! Did yoe see the building http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310024587 ? I think these is a duplicate entry.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:17:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mueschel (2019-12-24 15:19:05+00:00): Hi,
you added some nodes with 
waymarker=yes here. This tag is very uncommon. Did you mean

information = guidepost
touris = information
?
mavl (2019-04-09 16:17:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:17:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:18:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:18:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:18:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Carnildo (2016-07-30 08:47:55+00:00): Did you forget to add tags to this?
MappingJunkie (2016-07-30 19:35:22+00:00): Thanks for noticing.  This is a work in progress that requires loading lots of GeoTiffs.  Since the boundary is not complete, I will leave it un-tagged until it is ready for publication.
SomeoneElse (2016-09-16 20:00:43+00:00): Hello,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/434829834 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/435182123 seem to be duplicates here?
Best Regards,
Andy
stephankn (2018-03-02 08:28:49+00:00): you deleted a lot of highway=* classifications when adding the durface. Did you replace/rename existing tags instead of adding a new one? I fixed some, bout would be nice if you could review the other edits you did during this time to ensure that others got their tags back as well
freebeer (2018-12-05 14:20:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65206169 where the changeset comment is: delete Yet Another bogus maps.me Whatever, spammed as private residence
SomeoneElse (2016-08-03 22:14:33+00:00): Hello,
I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.  Questions have been raised about the accuracy of the boundaries of Morocco, and I'm sending this message to many of the mappers who have edited in the area or expressed an interest, including you.

We're aware that there is disputed territory in the region.  Most notably the area covered by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara , and also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceuta and other areas to the north.

First, it's worth mentioning https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/w/images/d/d8/DisputedTerritoriesInformation.pdf .  That explains that what matters most to OSM in terms of names, borders and boundaries is the "on the ground" rule.  For example, if a majority of the population of an area speaks language "a" then it makes sense for OSM's "name" tag to be in language "a" (though of course other name tags such as name:b, name:c etc. can also be used to make maps in other languages).  Similarly, if the people of an area consider themselves to be part of country "a" and country "a" does indeed have control over the area, it makes sense for the area to be part of country "a" (and only country "a") in OSM.

Potential problems in the area covered by the Morocco admin_level 2 relation http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3630439 include:

1) That relation includes not only the part of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Sahara currently administered by Morocco (the part west of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 ), it also includes the part of that territory east of it too.  Is this correct?  It seems at odds with OSM's "on the ground" rule, and with the UN peacekeepers' position described at http://www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/missions/minurso/background.shtml .

2) That relation also includes territories administered by Spain such as Ceuta and Melilla.  What evidence is there that Morocco controls these territories and that Spain does not?

Another major question, (largely dependant on the answer to (1) above) is:

3) If the area east of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_Wall_%28Western_Sahara%29 isn't part of Morocco, what status should it have?  http://osm.mapki.com/history/relation.php?id=195838 did represent this territory and had several different admin levels before it was deleted.

The DWG would be grateful for your opinions on these matters.  You can either reply here or, if you prefer you can email data@osmfoundation.org directly and we'll read through all the replies.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
smaprs (2016-08-04 00:10:00+00:00): Hope this situation will come to a stable mapping effort, to let other mappers keep on all the basic mapping still needed around there.
smaprs (2016-08-04 03:37:00+00:00): I've just took a look to see how many wadis were traced since I've mapped months ago. It's odd to see that wadis seem not much interesting in Western Sahara mappings.
Geography Canada (2016-08-04 13:48:23+00:00): "For example, if a majority of the population of an area speaks language "a" then it makes sense for OSM's "name" tag to be in language "a" (though of course other name tags such as name:b, name:c etc. can also be used to make maps in other languages).". Would this also mean that South Africa should be in Zulu because it has more speakers?
wambacher (2016-08-04 17:26:53+00:00): The area east of "West Sahara" has been maped as Sarahwi before. That is missing too.
Geography Canada (2016-08-04 19:15:40+00:00): Does that mean that SADR should be undeleted with Potlatch 1, SomeoneElse?
SomeoneElse (2016-08-30 21:03:02+00:00): Hello again,
Following on from my "I'm writing to you on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group" comment above, we'd had feedback from lots of OSM mappers in the area.  The findings and the changes that will be made are described at 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=606038#p606038 .  If you have any further comments you can contact the Data Working Group by email on data@osmfoundation.org
Thanks,
Andy
keithonearth (2016-11-30 06:56:48+00:00): It is helpful to other people if you give more information in the edit summary then just saying "mapping". Please do so.
trigpoint (2016-07-30 10:30:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
You have added a shelter inside a shopping centre, that seems a very odd place to map a shelter. What were you trying to achieve/
trigpoint (2016-08-18 15:44:35+00:00): No response from maps.me user so reverting unlikely edit
user_5359 (2016-07-30 18:24:55+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If you didn't delete the wrong street, there is no effect.

I have done the necessary work.
joost schouppe (2016-08-04 09:51:23+00:00): En el mapeo de natural=wood de Bolivia, siempre evité de mapear zonas que estan punctuados de zonas agriculturales. Por ejemplo aca esta lleno de chacras: http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=16/-16.9760/-65.5577
En zonas parecidos he mapeado mas detallado: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-16.0757/-67.7585&layers=D
Como puedes ver, empezé con un polygono bruto de una zona totalmente natural, despues no mas hice tambien la zona mas complicada. Esto tambien evita necesitar polygones muy largos complicados, como estos se rompan facilmente y son dificil a entender bien. Antes lo hicé como tu lo haces ahora, pero la experiencia me enseño que te complican la vida.
So no vas hacer con mas detalle, habra que mapear con landuse=forest para indicar que ya no es bosque natural. Pero en mi opinion mas vale mapear estas zonas dificiles en detalle, o no mapearla.
JJIglesias (2016-08-04 13:50:37+00:00): Saludos Joost. tratare de hacer zonas mas pequeñas para indicar las partes de Floresta= Wood o Bosque Manejado= Forest.
Con respecto a las Chacras q hay Todas son Ilegales, por eso esas zonas NO pueden ser consideradas Bosque Manejado= Forest; pues seria Legalizar lo ilegal. Gracias por la nota. JJ
joost schouppe (2016-08-04 14:04:26+00:00): Hola JJ, gracias!
Pues la diferencia entre landuse=forest y natural=wood no esta muy claro, y lo que dijé yo no esta aceptado para todos. Vea http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest Pero por lo que sepa, nadie dice que tiene algo que ver con lo legal.  Si se trata de zonas protegidas, se podria mapear con http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dprotected_area
Obviamente, puede que dentro de zonas protegidas pasan cosas ilegales. Pero mapeamos le que es, no lo que deberia de ser.
Endres Pelka (2016-07-31 14:14:44+00:00): Why deleting the perimeter (outer) of "Asentamiento Atalaya" (3883670) boundary relation? If such an administrative boundary doesn't really exist, please delete the whole relation, not only its members.
Supaplex (2016-08-10 10:56:02+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
_Нурлан (2016-07-30 13:32:35+00:00): я там и мед пиво пил
user_5359 (2016-10-09 15:46:56+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
zimba (2016-08-12 14:15:08+00:00): operator=GregersBoye at the bus stops is definitely wrong.
zimba (2016-09-01 09:39:50+00:00): okay, I reverted your changes because they were completely wrong
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:40:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
MapUserOne (2019-11-12 22:07:41+00:00): Hallo Renade,
es gibt einige addr Nodes in deinem changeset, die es real nicht gibt, z.B. Schlehenweg 1 und 3 oder Akazienweg 5 und 7. Ich kann vor Ort nur grüne Wiesen entdecken. Gibt es eine Quelle für Deine Angaben?

Viele Grüße!
renade (2019-11-17 21:30:46+00:00): Hi,
vielen Dank für Deine Rückmeldung. Das ist schon eine Weile her! Damals waren noch nicht alle Häuser gebaut, so wie wohl heute immer noch? Aufgrund der vorgefundenen Hausnummern habe ich die fehlenden nach meiner Einschätzung ergänzt. 
Viele Grüße
MapUserOne (2019-12-06 12:18:34+00:00): Hallo,

tatsächlich sind die meisten Flächen noch nicht bebaut, wenn auch viel Bauaktivität vorhanden ist. Problem beim Raten ist aber, dass evtl. die Hausnummern gar nicht stimmen, weil die Grundstücke anderen Straßen zugeordnet sind. Das würde man aber nur im Kataster sehen können, und der ist m.W.n. nicht öffentlich...

Grüße!
Ильин Роман (2016-07-31 05:53:29+00:00): почему вы удаляете полигоны, а не делаете как правильно??? это не моя правка, я в принципе!!! Если вы точно знаете что это территория колледжа, будьте так любезны его обозначить а не просо удалить неправильный полигон!
user_5359 (2016-07-30 18:14:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I can’t find the street of your address nearby.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 15:47:20+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
FredrikLindseth (2016-07-30 06:02:12+00:00): Denne her gir ikke så mye mening. Du må i det minste gi den et navn og gjerne en type. feks amenity=parking. Area=yes betyr ingenting alene. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Area
user_5359 (2018-03-24 10:00:36+00:00): Hello! You add the key suite twice: suite=400 and suite_1=4. I assumed that the value 400 is wrong (highest value in the building is suite 10). Can you confirm this?
user_5359 (2018-03-24 10:01:21+00:00): Sorry: Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4327600056/history
user_5359 (2016-10-09 15:47:39+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:39:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
user_5359 (2016-07-30 18:00:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3900701989  ? I think these is a duplicate! If you need help to merge the information: You are welcome!
naoliv (2016-08-04 01:37:38+00:00): Is this "Pokémon centre" a real place or it's a virtual place from Pokémon GO game, please?
AgusQui (2016-08-15 20:23:21+00:00): Esta es parada del 160 supongo: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4327649380#map=18/-34.68116/-58.41766&layers=T
AgusQui (2016-08-15 20:26:00+00:00): y esta otra supongo que tambien: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4327649379
nicolas17 (2016-08-15 23:00:50+00:00): Iba editando con el celular desde arriba del colectivo, no puedo poner todos los datos tan rápido :D Otro día grabé nota de voz, que todavía no procesé, puede ser que ahí tenga más info.
user_5359 (2016-07-30 17:51:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You are NOT a church! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think you live in the middle of a parking slot.
eggie (2020-09-26 08:00:46+00:00): 
Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2016-10-09 15:47:59+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-09 15:48:18+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
szydzio (2021-09-30 18:25:00+00:00): Hej! Ta stacja naprawdę ma taki adres ? Pozdr!
michal_k (2021-10-01 06:53:30+00:00): Hej, adres stacji to Sikorskiego 1, ale ten adres dotyczy również innych sekcji PKP przy tej ulicy, przez to często pojawiają się problemy ze znalezieniem odpowiedniej sekcji.
Co do stacji to można uzupełnić dane wg oznaczenia PKP energetyka - Linia nr 279 Lubań - Węgliniec, tor nr 50, EPS14.
szydzio (2021-10-02 11:25:01+00:00): Hej! Dzięki za szybką odpowiedź :)
Zgłoszę zatem ten adres do weryfikacji i ewentualnego uzupełnienia w ewidencji UMiG Węgliniec. Mam teraz taki mały projekt poprawy adresacji na terenie Węglińca i gminy. Jak widać np. tutaj => 
https://polska.e-mapa.net/mobile/#search=W%C4%99gliniec Z%C5%82a Droga 7&1633173829425 są w niej błędy (te 3 domu są w rzeczywistości przypisane do ul. Mickiewicza). Jestem w kontakcie z urzędem, będziemy starać się prostować takie pomyłki. P.S. Będziesz coś myślał o powrocie do mapowania w Węglińcu? Pozdr!
szydzio (2021-10-02 13:56:02+00:00): Sorry, zły link i się wkleił, tu poprawny => https://polska.e-mapa.net?userview=40062
michal_k (2021-10-03 20:28:17+00:00): Hej. Co do adresu "Sikorskiego 1" to wychodzi na to że wszystkie sekcje czy spółki PKP znajdujące się na działce 237/50 mają ten sam adres.
Jeżeli chodzi o te 3 budynki to są (powinny być) przypisane do ulicy Mickiewicza.
A jeżeli chodzi o Węgliniec, ale nie tylko bo np Czerwona Woda również to jest sporo rzeczy do uzupełnienia, przede wszystkim nowe budynki mieszkalne, wybudowane w tym i poprzednim roku, właśnie zakończył się również remont całej ulicy Sikorskiego a co za tym idzie sporo nowych parkingów, ścieżka rowerowa itd....
Jeżeli chodzi o mapowanie to z czasem pewnie wrócę do tego ale obecnie ze względów zawodowych (chodzi głównie o czas)nie mam za bardzo możliwości żeby się tym zajmować w szerszym zakresie, ale chętnie pomogę (w miarę możliwości) w wyjaśnianiu jakichkolwiek nieścisłości
Pozdrawiam
marczoutendijk (2016-07-30 15:13:17+00:00): What exactly does your comment "b" mean?
What changes did you make?
Bo Han (2016-07-30 17:18:15+00:00): the foot path at van embdenstraat was not correct,
Bo Han (2016-07-30 17:20:06+00:00): this  434850667 is the correct foot path, the current one on the map is not right
Kai Johnson (2023-07-17 14:45:04+00:00): I'm not sure whether the latest changes to the Langertstein node are correct. Can you verify whether the changes to the tags are appropriate?
user_5359 (2016-07-30 17:29:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I can’t find the street of your address nearby.
stefanct (2021-07-13 00:47:14+00:00): Das liegt aber am conditional access... bicycle yes ist/war falsch.
stefanct (2021-07-13 00:49:36+00:00): ok, *war*. da hätte aber auch damals schon das conditional access gelöscht gehört... mach ich jetzt.
user_5359 (2016-07-30 17:13:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please double check the position of your node: I don't think you live in the middle of a street.
Please double check the position of your node: I can't find the street of your address nearby.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:18:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-09 16:18:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Jbah (2018-04-26 21:08:52+00:00): Wie viel muss denn wirklich sichtbar sein? Bei den paar bei denen ich mal vorbei geschaut habe, war kaum etwas erkennbar.
Parzelle13 (2018-04-27 06:57:38+00:00): Diese Einträge fügt er auch in NRW ein. Wenn man bei Wanderungen an diesen Stellen vorbei kommt, sieht man meistens absolut nichts davon.
Jbah (2018-04-27 14:03:35+00:00): Wie soll vorgegangen sein? Wenn nichts sichtbar ist, sollten sie ja eigentlich entfernt werden. Wurde das schon mal irgendow diskuttiert?