piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Антін Сартенченко (2017-07-23 19:02:41+00:00): Примерно в том месте, куда я передвинул label, — юго-восточнее пруда, располагалось село, давшее название району. По сути здесь находится исторический центр.
http://dic.academic.ru/pictures/wiki/files/80/Plan_of_Moscow_1917.jpg
literan (2017-07-24 10:53:14+00:00): При чем здесь исторический центр? Этот тег - для современных районов городов, а не для исторических (для исторических, т.е. бывших когда-либо, используйте другие теги, полагаю, какие-то historic=). Читайте вики https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb "Place a node at the centre of the suburb tagged with place=suburb".
Антін Сартенченко (2017-07-24 16:10:40+00:00): По Вашей логике точка центра Москвы (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1686293227) должна располагаться где-то в лесу между Пушкиным и Летовым, западнее Калужского шоссе D-:
literan (2017-07-24 16:24:33+00:00): А по Вашей логике - точка Российской Федерации должна быть в районе Киева http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=3/53.70/84.81 ? Это не моя логика, это логика вики (всегда можно обсудить и если надо - изменить правила, на форуме, например - но пока они есть, это закон). Могут и быть исключения, полагаю, как из любого правила, но (sic!) обоснованные.
sommerluk (2017-08-08 08:57:19+00:00): Salut tchedji.

Tu as ajouté beaucoup de nouveaux rues en Abomey-Calavi. Ça a amélioré la carte beaucoup. Merci !

Une petite astuce : Ici au Bénin normalement nous utilisons highway=residential pour les petites rues, même s’il n’y pas de goudron. highway=path est seulement pour des chemins ou on ne peut pas passer en voiture.

Merci pour ta contribution !
datamongers (2017-07-24 12:47:33+00:00): Hello,
Are you sure this is actually a pet shop? This location seems to be on a sidewalk, did you mean one of the adjacent yurts is a pet shop?
eggie (2017-07-22 14:15:46+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
eggie (2017-07-22 14:18:03+00:00): Persoonlijke notes zijn niet toegestaan... Je bijdrage zal worden verwijderd.
eggie (2017-07-22 14:20:17+00:00): Reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50481631
eggie (2017-07-22 19:26:41+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd en tip om voorgaande mapper in te seinen bij veranderen busroutes.
oormilavinod (2017-07-26 05:47:10+00:00): 
hey UltimateRelaxation, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
Supaplex (2017-10-01 15:15:13+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
SomeoneElse (2017-07-24 10:06:40+00:00): Hi James,
This looks very much like a mechanical edit - was it discussed anywhere?
Not that I expect that anyone would necessarily have complained, but a "heads up" to anyone who's consuming the data would have been nice.
Also, I presume that you did actually check all 135 nodes to see if they were actually plausibly dog waste bins (not in the middle of a building or a lake, for example).
Best Regards,
Andy
JamesKingdom (2017-07-24 10:49:17+00:00): Hi Andy,
Sorry for not notifying, I was just going on the basis that the amount being modified was quite low.
I checked most locations, but I will double check them all later today, or I can revert them if you like.
Sorry for the inconvenience 
James
JamesKingdom (2017-07-24 14:58:11+00:00): Hi Andy,
I have checked on the map and imagery, and all 135 look to be in plausible locations.
Sorry again for the fuss,
James
Владимир К (2017-07-24 23:20:58+00:00): давай для любых деревьев использовать natural=wood
Джон Макклейн (2017-08-02 12:41:08+00:00): хорошо
literan (2017-07-23 11:25:56+00:00): на два отдельных way обычно (и об этом был консенсус на форуме) делятся улицы, на которых не менее двух полос в каждом направлении (или те, которые имеют физический отбойник посередине). Ни того, ни другого на Зорге нет (тем более вы механически провели вторую линию, даже не соединив (!!!) ее с пересекающимися улицами, сломав роутинг в этом районе, не исправили маршруты автобусов). Откатываю.
Sancheslee (2017-07-23 17:57:00+00:00): механически? до этого момента там вообще одностороняя была, результат каждое утро аварии, по тому как люди ещё не привыкли к разделению на две полосы
literan (2017-07-24 21:56:47+00:00): нет, не была она односторонней: еще месяц назад, через день после того как вернули двустороннее движение на местности, iWowik сделал ее двусторонней и в базе: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49506583#map=15/55.7874/37.5083 А вас прошу быть в дальнейшем аккуратнее - если бы я не заметил эту ошибку, могли бы страдать многие местные жители, которых бы навигаторы посылали нарезать круги через Куусинена
Sancheslee (2017-07-25 05:18:22+00:00): он и так их посылал через куусинена тк внешняя сторона дороги хорошовки не была связана с зорге, ничто не идеально особенно осм
literan (2017-07-25 09:34:54+00:00): внешняя сторона Хорошевки и не должна быть связана с Зорге - там теперь сплошная. Я имею в виду, что например из домов 6 к1, к2, 10 к1 к2 к3 и так далее после ваших кривых правок людям, чтобы на север по Зорге поехать, рисовало огромные крюки, т.к. вы выезды из их дворов не соединили с направленным на север вэем Зорге
Sancheslee (2017-07-25 10:09:22+00:00): сделайте тогда прямые правки раз вы такой умный, только не надо хамить
Sancheslee (2017-07-25 10:12:31+00:00): вот от куда вы взяли , что на хорошовке сплошная? там ещё старая разметка которая ведёт на поворот в зорге
literan (2017-07-25 10:13:00+00:00): Где я вам хамил? Какие "прямые правки" вы хотите, чтобы я сделал?
Sancheslee (2017-07-25 10:18:54+00:00): я от вас ничего не хочу, но вы явно не знакомы с ситуацией
literan (2017-07-25 10:21:36+00:00): Вот отсюда: http://roads.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=33276&p=352989 и ниже
literan (2017-07-25 10:23:03+00:00): http://roads.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=33276&p=355213 - вот - висит знак "прямо". Если вы обладаете водительскими правами, наверняка знаете, что требования знаков важнее требований дорожной разметки.
Sancheslee (2017-07-25 11:03:30+00:00): https://yadi.sk/i/RgE1SW3_3LPFkY
Sancheslee (2017-07-25 11:05:38+00:00): https://yadi.sk/i/K-miU5X33LPG7y
Sancheslee (2017-07-25 11:07:26+00:00): я то нахожусь на зорге и вижу изменения, а вы судите по комментариям людей без фотопруфов
literan (2017-07-25 11:21:41+00:00): ну, на второй фото знаки движения по полосам - только прямо. Они имеют приоритет над указателями направлений.
JamesKingdom (2017-07-22 16:01:53+00:00): Hi,
It seems that this is already mapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4842883424 ?
nammala (2017-07-25 05:25:16+00:00): Hi, 

May I know the reason behind deleting the bank .

Regards,
nammala
DD1GJ (2017-07-25 06:10:42+00:00): Hi nammala, the german changeset comment means, that the bank doesn't exist anymore. In Germany many branch banks were closed as a consequence of online banking and low interest rates.

Regards, Joachim
nammala (2017-07-25 06:20:57+00:00): Thanks DD1GJ for getting back and the clarification.
VictorIE (2018-01-22 04:10:24+00:00): Hi, what is this relation? https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7411709

The rest of Luas has operator=Luas - Transdev Dublin Light Rail Limited

Note that operator is the system operator, not the tram driver. With Luas, the system operator is complicated enough to include both names.
Teester (2018-01-23 16:55:05+00:00): It's a network relation. A super-relation for route masters.  It's suggested in JOSM as an option, but I don't think it's an approved relation type on the wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Network), but it's used in several cities.  I have one for Dublin Bus as well which was helping me keep track of bus routes (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7415800), though I've fallen behind in that a little.  

Feel free to delete them if you think they're unsuitable.  They are kind of close to being a  relation-as-category.
Commodoortje (2017-07-22 18:11:20+00:00): Je hebt per ongeluk het gebouw laten verdwijden, nadat je de adresnode verplaatst had en aangevuld met de pizzeria.
Inmiddels het ik het gebouw teruggeplaatst.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50484356
Wim Heestermans (2017-07-22 18:34:25+00:00): Ok, dank
santamariense (2017-07-22 19:34:30+00:00): Olá domarco,

O salão que você criou (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4986905221) já existia em mapa (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364652385). De qualquer maneira, tua edição foi importante que trouxe dados complementares (telefone e horários de mapeamento) ao que já estava mapeado. Os dados serão copiados do objeto que você criou para o que já existe, e será apagado pois não é correto ter informações duplicadas em mapa.

Você mesmo pode fazer isso. Você pode editar tudo que tem no mapa por este link https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=19/-29.70244/-53.71676

Comunico que temos uma comunidade gaúcha do OSM (mapa utilizado pelo Maps.Me) no Telegram, sinta-se convidado a participar. https://t.me/osmrs

Boas contribuições,

santamariense
SafwatHalaby_bot (2017-07-24 08:48:27+00:00): I think you should be using addr:housenumber or something similar rather than name
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-24 08:48:59+00:00): Take a look at tel aviv: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/32.03859/34.75466
Commodoortje (2017-07-22 18:15:44+00:00): Ik heb voetgangersgebied omgezet naar highway=service
Het is een pad naar de garageboxen.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50486601
Jvitegem (2017-07-22 19:48:37+00:00): Helemaal goed..
Ik snap ook niet hoe dat kan dat het voetgangers gebied is geworden ...
Ik heb alleen via de app streetcompleet de naam en de bestrating aangepast...
Commodoortje (2017-07-23 11:10:38+00:00): Klopt, je hebt niets verkeerd gedaan.
Jvitegem (2017-07-23 19:16:51+00:00): Hoe kan dat dan ?

Want het lijkt net alsof ik dat aangepast hebt...
alphensebezorger (2017-07-28 15:47:51+00:00): Ik geef toch nog maar even antwoord op je vraag, voor het geval je er nog op zat te wachten.
De weggetjes staan al 10 jaar als voetgangersgebied op OSM. Daar heb je niets aan veranderd, dus maak je daarover geen zorgen.
Je kunt het zelf nakijken door op de website op een van de drie 'ways' te klikken, en dan links onderaan op 'Geschiedenis weergeven'.
Dan beland je bv. op https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/7170221/history, een overzicht van alle versies die van de weg bestaan hebben.

Succes met mappen verder.
Hjart (2017-07-22 18:45:14+00:00): What was the bug?
pgoergen (2017-07-22 18:55:59+00:00): The connection through the building is on ground level but was tagged as a tunnel. I split the way into segments,made it ground level and tagged the connection through the building as such.
Hjart (2017-07-22 19:09:15+00:00): I usually do not bother creating tunnel=building_passage. I'm lazy and just add a layer=-1 to footways etc to tell that they actually goes under/through a building.
I'm quite familiar with the area (and actually cycled past yesterday) btw and am responsible for most of the editing here.
pgoergen (2017-07-22 19:16:43+00:00): I wouldn't have bothered on my own but one of the bots flagged it as a bug. so I thought instead of just marking it as false positive I'll change it to match the bots taste. The Viking centre is very nicely mapped by the way :). Can't check easily on the mobile but I guess that's at least partly your doing so: nice Job!
Hjart (2017-07-22 19:19:50+00:00): The Geodatastyrelsen imagery (available in Vespucci too) will show buildings etc older than a year.
I used Vespucci while I was in Ribe yesterday
Hjart (2017-07-22 19:26:43+00:00): You've been editing here for 2 days now. Are you staying at the Viking center?
pgoergen (2017-07-22 21:52:12+00:00): Yes, I guess it's obvious. I'm there with the family for two weeks, a bit more than one week left now.
Alecs01 (2017-07-23 11:51:12+00:00): Hi, is this a guest house or a private home?
Kagami (2017-07-25 16:21:01+00:00): 感謝您! 我早就想這樣做了，但苦於沒時間
opendcc (2017-07-22 19:32:48+00:00): Hallo,

dieser Aussichtspunkt - ist der da im Wald?

Servus Wolfgang
HarryO66 (2017-07-23 14:47:32+00:00): Nein auf freier Wiese überhalb eines Abhangs, ich hab da noch die Geländekante eingezeichnet. Wenn man auf der Bank sitzt hat man eine schöne Aussicht in nördliche Richtung und sieht Kloster Au. Der Waldstreifen in nördlicher Richtung ist so weit unten dass man darüber hinweg sieht.
Harry
TourenbikerFKB (2017-07-23 15:27:35+00:00): Im Luftbild ist die Bank aber unmittelbar an einem Waldstück positioniert, das in OSM noch nicht erfaßt ist. Weiter östlich gibt es aber eine Schneise etwa im Bereich der Hochspannungsleitung. Ich denke, dass die Bank eher dort zu finden ist. Oder ist das Waldstück, das man in den Luftbildern (auch bei denen von Google Maps) inzwischen gerodet worden?
TourenbikerFKB (2017-07-23 15:28:17+00:00): ..daß man in den Luftbildern sieht...
TourenbikerFKB (2017-07-23 15:28:50+00:00): und  "das" natürlich mit s :-)
HarryO66 (2017-07-23 17:06:15+00:00): Hallo TourenbikerFKB,
du hattest recht mit dem Waldstück und die Bank ist näher an der Stromleitung über der Schneise. Die Schneise ist inzwischen wieder völlig frei geschnitten. Das Fehlende Waldstück hab ich auch nachgezeichnet. War eben gerade vor Ort und hab es mir angesehen und auch die Koordinaten der Bank ausgelesen. Nebenbei hab ich auch noch die Infotafel "Innauen und Leitenwälder" eingezeichnet. Danke für den Hinweis.
Harry
vramirez122000 (2017-07-26 17:02:20+00:00): Did you delete both Roosevel Roads and Camp Santiago military bases. Roosevelt Roads no longer exists, but Camp Santiago exists and is home to the Puerto Rico National Guard. We should add Camp Santiago back to the map
DaveF (2017-07-22 22:25:17+00:00): I'm confused now. Is or isn't the crescent oneway to vehicles?
AlanStans (2017-07-23 20:46:18+00:00): At the moment it appears to be only that it is no entry at the southern end (except bikes). But did not see any one way signs at any other part so presume you can turn around and drive north.  Work of course may not be complete, the Metro bus plans show changes to the layout at the northern end.
The intention appears to be to stop through traffic.
DaveF (2017-07-28 16:01:17+00:00): Conformation from Metrobus:
"Motorists can no longer enter Avon Crescent from Cumberland Rd. Motorists on the road can exit it from the north by the Nova Scotia."
wambacher (2017-07-22 18:21:58+00:00): Aber hallo! So geht es nicht weiter. Ich habe die Data Working Group verständigt und um eine Sperre deines Accounts gebeten.
Chrysopras (2017-07-22 19:46:55+00:00): Du kannst gerne weiter Überwachungskameras u.Ä. erfassen – vielen Dank dafür! –, aber verzichte doch bitte einfach auf die problematischen Namen. Wenn Du angeben willst, zu welcher Firma etc. eine Kamera gehört, kannst Du das über operator=<Firmenname> o.Ä. machen, ohne Zusätze wie „Bespitzelung“.

Setze doch einfach auf die überzeugende Kraft der Fakten, sprich auf die schlichte Erfassung der Kameras; das wirkt letztlich viel überzeugender als Ausdrücke wie „Bespitzelung“, weil Deine Erfassung der Kameras dann objektiv und neutral wirkt.

Und diskutiere doch einfach mit: unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=656176 kommen wir gerne mit Dir ins Gespräch!
Hjart (2017-07-22 18:28:26+00:00): Ups, source for this is Strava cycling heatmap, gps & DG standard imagery
laznik (2017-07-23 03:29:14+00:00): Hi. The "name" tag is designated for official name of the object. I do not speak Hebrew, but a software translator returns "A restaurant is available for lunch", which is apparently not the name of the establishment. For information of that type osm has tag "note". Please fix this problem as well as a similar one with your other edit that you made in Banska Stiavnica: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50485789
iandees (2017-07-23 00:37:03+00:00): Reverted lettering/spam ways in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50491420
PlaneMad (2017-08-25 13:26:39+00:00): Hi, thank you for contributing to the map, you have added some useful details like missing buildings and playgrounds which are very useful, but it doesn't explain why you drew various words like “PENIS” “YUKI” “YoYos Crib” “Smd ww” and also drew a human male reproductive organ on a public map.

It might have been a mistake and has been cleaned up. Please let us know if you would like help to better understand how to contribute to this community project.
msevilla00 (2017-07-28 12:05:38+00:00): Hello, it is good if you add a comment in your edits to know what did you do without to open to the changeset. Cheers
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-07-25 14:18:08+00:00): Por favor, não mapeie assim, passando uma via por cima da outra: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/509483055/history
Constable (2017-07-25 15:32:37+00:00): hi there, I've just noticed that you added a waterway=stream. Would you please be so kind to add few bridges, tunnels or ford tags where that stream crosses roads and trails?
Here you can see your changeset details
http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=50487397
thanks
Hjart (2017-07-22 20:58:13+00:00): Bemærk at de luftfotos du har tegnet efter her stadig er fra foråret 2016. 2017 kommer først i løbet af nov-dec
MicDK (2017-07-23 11:36:36+00:00): Hej. 

Ja, jeg er klar over det. Jeg bruger dog også de nyeste luftfotos fra foråret 2017, som er at finde her:
http://drift.kortinfo.net/Map.aspx?Site=Svendborg&Page=Kortopslag&sso=0
AsgerFrank (2017-07-23 16:47:07+00:00): Strengt taget er det jo så SDFE foreløbigt forårsortofoto 2017 (=Quick Ortofotos), det forsøger jeg gerne at angive i ventetiden på de endelige.
MicDK (2017-07-23 21:50:26+00:00): Skal notere det fremover, AsgerFrank. Det er selvfølgelig det helt korrekte.
mueschel (2017-07-23 09:00:09+00:00): Hi,
could you explain how you added these huge landuse areas? According to satellite images, they don't seem to be correct. For example, there is a larger town in one of your landuse=farmland  and vice versa.

Additionally, you used the unknown keys "Eneo" and "Matumizi". Can you explain the meaning of these?

Cheers, Jan
Palolo (2022-10-09 19:41:04+00:00): While it is good to work with local councils it is important to also follow OSM standards. Can you answer the question that Jan put forth?
Thanks
DaveF (2017-07-23 10:22:35+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/way/396051783

If buildings are demolished they should be removed from OSM as it's not a historical map.
Rowland (2017-07-23 11:16:10+00:00): Appreciate that, and of course that isn't the case for railways, but left the outline with a note as it's still visible on Bing imagery, to avoid confusion with any one coming along and only liking at that source.
DaveF (2017-07-23 14:06:51+00:00): Actually it is for railways. They're not rendered & should be transferred to Open History Map.
chillly (2017-07-22 20:51:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM

Thanks for the detail.

We mark objects either by a single point or (better still) by drawing an area. When we place the single point we try to position it around the middle of the object. Adding a farm to the middle  of a road is not how it is usually done. The aerial imagery shows a building to one side of the road, maybe it would be better to move the point there.
PietroPavese (2017-07-22 20:58:19+00:00): Great, thank you. I'm just starting and I was purely having a look at functions. Do you know if there is a way to add house names to the map?
chillly (2017-07-22 21:22:33+00:00): To add a house name I would always draw the outline of the house footprint, add a building tag and add the address tags. Don't use the name tag for a house name (common mistake) as that is for, say, a business name in a building. E.g a shop might have a building name as part of the address but the shop has a busness name in the name tag. 

HTH
carciofo (2017-07-26 16:51:58+00:00): Cordial saludo. Me pregunto la razón para haber borrado la relación de la Variante de Tuluá (25 VL E) en este changeset al igual que la eliminación de la mayoría de los segmentos del tramo 25-05 de la Ruta Nacional 25 en varios de sus changesets (sin comentarios, a propósito) del 21 y 22 de julio? Gracias de antemano por su respuesta
cris_1994 (2017-07-26 18:40:06+00:00): Se borraron todas las vias antiguas por mal trazado en el mapa, en base a la guia proporcionada por las nuevas vistas satelitales. Si gustas, puedes editar los datos de los tramos que mencionas, mas no el trazado que esta conforme a la vista satelital reciente. Cualquier duda, estoy por acá a la orden
carciofo (2017-07-27 06:29:48+00:00): Me refiero a la relación 5128404 que corresponde a la Variante de Tuluá (25 VL E), la cual fue borrada en este changeset. También se borraron muchos de las vías de la relación 4864513 entre Buga y Andalucía, que corresponden al trayecto 2503 de la Ruta Nacional 25. Por favor revierta el borrado de la relación 5128404 y reponga los trayectos faltantes de la relación 4864513. Gracias
carciofo (2017-08-23 10:07:58+00:00): No he recibido respuesta con respecto al borrado. En adicion a las relaciones antes descritas, veo que adicionalmente se borraron en este changeset relaciones de administrative boundaries, todo sin comentrario explicando la razon para el borrado. Le pido de nuevo que revierta el borrado de las relaciones en este changeset. De nuevo gracias.
carciofo (2017-10-06 07:58:11+00:00): I never heard back and the deleted relations were never restored, despite newer changesets by your user account. I have gone ahead and restored the relation for National Highway 25 in question for this changeset. In the process, I also noticed that all previous segments for that relation were deleted and recreated, resulting in the loss off all history for those ways. In addition to being more careful with deleting relations (especially those pertaining to national level road networks), I would like to ask that you be more considerate of other's work and the time it takes for them to revert (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_remove_tags_that_you_don.27t_understand), to edit instead of delete existing objects so as to preserve their history whenever possible (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history). Lastly, please enter more descriptive changeset comments as explained in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments. I don't know if you didn't revert your changes out of a lack of willingness, or simply because you didn't know how to. If the latter, please feel free to reach out to me or the community in the future with any questions so that we may work together to better the map (this is a community endeavor after all), especially in Colombia, which can do with a lot of quality improvement. In any case, thanks for your contributions to the map.
Palolo (2018-10-14 21:39:02+00:00): @msppingkat What is the source of your landuse cartography? Most of the area in your residential polygon does not have houses.  Thank you for helping map Tanzania.
Ccbon (2017-07-23 18:36:07+00:00): Der Wasserhochbehälter ist kein Wasserturm sondern eine Speicherkaverne auf einem Berg.
bastik (2017-07-23 22:37:22+00:00): Und woher stammt die Information, dass sich hier eine Wasser-Speicherkaverne befindet?
Ccbon (2017-07-30 18:30:24+00:00): Katasterkarte der Stadt Bonn.
bastik (2017-08-14 19:09:39+00:00): Ist die Karte online abrufbar? Im Kataster auf der Seite http://stadtplan.bonn.de/cms/cms.pl?Amt=Stadtplan&set=3_12_0_0 kann ich nichts erkennen.
eggie (2017-07-22 20:30:24+00:00): In het begin volgen we de edits van startende mappers. Juist ook om te helpen.
foot=yes hoort niet op een fietspad. Je mag daar gewoon komen en je noet er zelfs lopen als er geen alternatief is.
Dus graag weghalen.
Hier de access tags voor Nderland. Wat groen is ..is default. Dus niet taggen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands