piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eest9 (2017-03-22 23:18:40+00:00): Ich bin aus St. Georgen/Leys und habe noch nie von "Törl" gehört oder gelesen.
Außerdem sollte an dieser Stelle ohnehin "Drei Tore" sein und kein "Törl"
Hast du eine Quelle für dieses "Törl"?
aceman444 (2020-03-29 16:38:40+00:00): Hi, please do not make up fictional names of objects and do not describe objects via the 'name' tag. The type of the object should be described using the appropriate tag, e.g. historic=wayside_cross, not name:en=wayside cross. Putting descriptions into names is useless and no application/map can use that.
richlv (2017-03-12 20:39:34+00:00): heya, are you sure about the addr:street tag here ? "Namdaru" street seems to be quite some distance to the north

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/305601461/history
d1g (2017-03-21 02:28:04+00:00): шум и мусор кроме одной точки-дубля
user_6110846 (2017-09-26 06:37:46+00:00): Велика подяка за вулиці від проєкту. Але наступного разу подивіться як це робиться в інших містах також є правила Правило про назви http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B8. Також згідно багатьох обговорень на forum.openstreetmap.org/ ми П. Чубинського Т Шевченка намагаємося уникати. Також якщо провулок на декілька хат а назва задовга та складається зі слів які в інших проєктах мап прийнято скорочувати то в даному проєкті НІЯКИХ скорочень. Для скорочених назв існує інший теґ. Тому ніяких пров., П.Чубинського .
NetWormKido (2017-03-17 13:50:18+00:00): Отмеченный вами туалет только для клиентов Гостинного двора?
саша «MASTER» белый (2017-03-23 20:54:07+00:00): Да.
NetWormKido (2017-03-24 04:04:03+00:00): В таком случае нужно указывать, что доступ только для клиентов (access=customers), чтобы люди с улицы не обламались при поиске ОБЩЕСТВЕНОГО туалета =) Поправил.
RandomMappppist (2026-01-22 09:35:26+00:00): Skitour should be reserved to paths.
PT-53 (2017-03-12 19:49:46+00:00): Hallo Ralf,
Du hast den Parkplatzweg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480073795)  im Süden nicht korrekt mit der Straße verbunden.
Außerdem ist der Zusatz parking=lane am P-Node unnötig / falsch. (Siehe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking / http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane).
Überarbeitest Du das nochmal ?
Grüße
ralfostrach (2017-03-12 20:32:48+00:00): Ich hoffe das es jetzt in Ordnung ist .
Sonst musst Du mir helfen und erklären was der Zusatz am P- Note genau ist.
Grüße Ralf
PT-53 (2017-03-14 08:17:15+00:00): Hallo Ralf,
die P-Straße ist jetzt korrekt an beiden Enden mit der Landstraße verbunden.
Ein parking=lane wird (nur) verwandet, wenn direkt entlang der Straße / am Fahrbahnrand geparkt wird (kommt vermutlich nur Innerorts vor). Das hier ist ein "separater" Parkplatz parling=lane ist sowieso veraltet. Der neue Schlüssel ist parking_lane=yes (Siehe: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane)
Schau Dir mal das Bild oben rechts an. Das ist ein Beispiel für eine parking_lane.

Übrigends: Fehler macht jeder mal. Das ist kein Problem. Aus Fehlern kann man ja auch lernen. Dazu muß man aber wissen, daß man einen Fehler gemacht hat. Aus diesem Grunde habe ich die Fehler nicht selbst behoben, sondern Dich informiert.
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-03-14 08:23:15+00:00): Gibt es auf dem Parkplatz vielleicht eine Sitzbank bzw. ein Picknicktisch ?
Das wäre noch eine interessante Information.
Eine Sitzbank wird mit amenity=bench eingetragen (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dbench) ein Picknicktisch mit leisure=picnic_table (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dpicnic_table).
Grüße
bhousel (2017-03-12 21:39:06+00:00): Thanks for your contributions and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Hjart (2017-03-12 19:44:46+00:00): Skulle det ikke hedde "Tuse Næs Ridebane" i stedet for "Tuse Næse Ridebane"?
Thue Janus Kristensen (2017-03-12 19:54:01+00:00): Umm, jo :)
Hjart (2017-03-12 20:01:35+00:00): Du får lige en "Næse" for den :-)
Thue Janus Kristensen (2017-03-12 20:02:06+00:00): :P
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:39:20+00:00): Waardevolle aanpassingen, doch surface=Julianaduin kan toch niet de bedoeling zijn.
seattlefyi (2017-03-13 15:26:55+00:00): Hi Michael,
Thanks for moving the bike shop! Useful change. My only suggestion is when deleting points-of-interest to view the tags, and delete the obsolete tags one-by-one (All editing apps, including Go Map!!, let you do this). Otherwise we lose the old empty shop's address point, which should be still there! I already put it back (and moved the opening hours/phone number to the new place). Pls let me know if you have ??s. Thanks again for editing, hope to see more!
Michael Kenney (2017-03-13 15:32:58+00:00): Thanks for the tip. Sorry about deleting the address.
Carnildo (2017-03-13 23:19:09+00:00): If you want to practice editing, there's a development server you can use: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing
Ars-UA (2017-03-12 20:05:03+00:00): Убрал названия "ЦТП" (центральный тепловой пункт).
Ars-UA (2017-03-12 20:07:48+00:00): Убрал названия "Котельная", оставил только "building=industrial".
Wulfmorn (2017-03-25 12:19:13+00:00): Klarälvsbanan saknar massor av kopplingar till korsande vägar.
Per (2017-03-26 07:28:35+00:00): Bra iakttagelse! Banan dök upp för många år sedan och jag har inte tänkt så mycket på detta mer än justerat noder. Skall ta ett ryck någon kväll och gå igenom i vart fall hela norra sträckningen.
Wulfmorn (2017-03-26 17:11:27+00:00): säg till om du vill ha hjälp. kan ta allt som är synligt i Bing.
mueschel (2017-03-13 21:21:34+00:00): Hi,
schau dir mal das Tagging von diesem Way an, da ist was schiefgelaufen:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47435488

Gruss, Jan
bielebog (2017-03-13 22:03:27+00:00): Auha, das gehört _da_ nicht rein. Das war ein Cut'n Paste-Fehler. Gut gesehen, danke.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-05-01 13:24:05+00:00): Vias foram desconectadas nesse changeset http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-55.89926&lat=-13.07926&zoom=14&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways
SomeoneElse (2017-03-12 22:00:10+00:00): Relation 7066589 has 37,948 nodes as members.  It's just broken an osm2pgsql import here, and I suspect I wont be the only one.

What is it actually supposed to be?
woodpeck (2017-03-12 22:18:07+00:00): I have also noticed that this import seems to have first been raised on talk-br on March 9, two days before the import was started. Problems like a collection relation with 37k members would have been found before the import if people had actually had time to look at what was proposed.
woodpeck (2017-03-12 22:21:56+00:00): The survey points seem to contain this message: "Não alterar: coordenadas originais do IBGE". I wonder why they are imported in OSM at all; what use is data that you cannot alter in OSM? Anyone interested in doing anything with the survey points can just use the shape file.
pnorman (2017-03-12 22:24:37+00:00): Hello,

Imports in OSM are subject to some requirements (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines), one of which the community is consulted prior to the import, including the imports@ mailing list.

Because this import is causing technical problems and has not been discussed, I'm going to go ahead and revert it. This should fix some of the technical problems data consumers are having.
smaprs (2017-03-12 22:29:36+00:00): Ok, if you think its' better to revert it. We discussed it in Brazilian community thinking these survey points have precise coordinates and can help align imagery in remote regions of Brazil. I'll read carefully your remarks and see what can be done better.
woodpeck (2017-03-12 22:39:38+00:00): I have looked that the Bing imagery surrounding some of the points and found nothing visible on the ground that I could have used to align the image though. I think the matter deserves a more thorough discussion. We'll revert it for now but that doesn't mean it can never come back.
smaprs (2017-03-12 22:51:03+00:00): Ok. Sorry for the unexpected problems.
smaprs (2018-03-02 15:28:32+00:00): Even if many (or any) marks are not visible by now, this is not a good argument to don't have the marks mapped.
Many marks are visible, and that's enough.
Being in the map, people may select them, like in Overpass, 
to search for them on the ground, take Mapillary pictures, use it for any reasons, as the map could offer to.
Also, images are getting improved year after year.
So, for sure having geodetic marks with precise coordinates 
is a great accurate way to have posibility to make 
improvements in georeference of images used in OSM, thus in OSM objects too, in any time.
Anyway, the rest of arguments of you all I agree, and again, sorry for the technical problems ocurred, 
that was a problem apart form the main goal intended and its reasons.
TourenbikerFKB (2017-08-02 21:36:25+00:00): Hallo gerdipp, du hast in Kirchheim das Gebäude der Mercedes-Werkstatt Schade und Sohn gegenüber REWE in area umgemappt. 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=potlatch2#map=19/50.83421/9.57170

Gibt es das Gebäude nicht mehr? Dann müßte aber auch der node weg. Und wenn das eine Fläche ist: was ist die Funktion?
TourenbikerFKB (2017-08-02 22:48:42+00:00): Inzwischen vermute ich einen Mappingfehler. Laut Webseite von Schade u. Sohn gibt es an dieser Adresse noch die Werkstatt für Nutzfahrzeuge.
dXtincT (2017-03-12 21:08:48+00:00): ok
SK53 (2017-06-19 19:21:48+00:00): Hi Alex,

You seem to have terraced a number of buildings in St Anns (e.g., Kelvedon Gardens) which are more complex, typically with 3 apartments in each section accessed by doors on ground & first floor. Ideally these need to be mapped with the address nodes on the doors, which will require fiddly things with access bridges, balconies & steps. With the places terraced they look (accurately) too thin for convenient living. I'd rather we wait and get it completely right than have to change from all these terraces.

Jerry
alexkemp (2017-06-20 08:33:47+00:00): Hello Jerry
Each apartment occupies 2 floors of a 3-floor apartment, which is more complex than you describe & difficult to map within OSM constraints ( I do not know of any current 3D representation). I've chosen a kludge which allows them to be accurately represented on the map by place. Fortunately, people live within RL rather than a map. I would rather map these dwellings as accurately as is currently possible rather than wait for perfection.
SK53 (2017-06-20 08:49:32+00:00): The current, entirely achievable, method for complex blacks like these is, as I said, to map the addresses on the doors. Also in general it's usually better to try & capture the actual situation : a few people working out how to do it is how OSM advances. The problem with these being terraced is that it makes it rather harder to change them with a more accurate representation.
alexkemp (2017-06-20 09:57:58+00:00): You are correct about how-to map apartment blocks (other colours than black are also available) & that is exactly how I map such many-floor buildings. These 3-level 1970s terraced buildings in St Anns are a halfway-house between apartments & 'normal' terraces. You are correct that the map representation is narrower than their actual footprint in RL; that is because this is a map and not RL (as one good example, the actual buildings are many metres wide whilst the map is just a few millimetres). No-one that lives within these terraces has yet complained.
SK53 (2017-06-20 12:49:34+00:00): A couple of points: it's a database not a map; we're trying to represent RL reasonably accurately, not keep residents in place X happy (or we'd have very different boundaries in many places in the world).

The problem with this as a halfway house representation is that the mapped thinness of the residences is obviously unlikely & inaccurate. 

We can do better.
alexkemp (2017-06-20 13:11:13+00:00): > We can do better.
I disagree. Mapping these terraces as an apartment block does NOT give an accurate display of the thickness of those flats. But that is not actually the point, is it? What it all boils down to is: I'm not doing it the way that you want. Well, tough. It seems to me to be the best way to map these particular buildings. The way that you suggest to use is wrong from my point of view. Now please: why not spend your time mapping rather than criticising *my* mapping?
SK53 (2017-06-20 13:50:31+00:00): The whole reason I'm looking at this is because I want to map other places in St Anns which have similar layout. I may have taken notes & photos last year of Kelvedon Gardens because I was searching for an example with the addresses mapped on the doors.

OSM is fundamentally a collaborative project and it works at its best when we collectively use a common style of mapping things. Yes we can have different points of view, but they should are best substantiated by widespread practice in OSM: not "this is my way tough".

In the main it's more important that things get mapped as long as there's enough info to make the mapping more elaborate over time. For instance the info you've added for Jedburgh Close is extremely useful for understanding how these buildings are laid out internally, with which levels each house number is located on : in fact if you provided this on others I could live with it as it's clearly more informative than what I can achieve not living in the area.
alexkemp (2017-07-10 10:36:44+00:00): > it's clearly more informative than what I can achieve not living in the area
I do not live in the area either, Jerry. Just like you, I have to travel there to map it. The difference, perhaps, is that I knock on the doors & talk to the folks that live in those terraces, rather than stand back & view them through the end of a telephoto lens. I then use the information that I obtain to map it in the best fashion that seems to apply, having referred first to the Wiki, & so on. Those terraces for which info is obtained I store within the map. Other, similar terraces where no-one answers the door have less info.

> OSM is fundamentally a collaborative project and it works at its best when we collectively use a common style of mapping things
So how come you spend your time accusing me of not doing things the way that *you* do it? If you actually believed your own words, then you would *ask* why I had mapped it that way, so that we can collaborate together to find the best way to map these terraces. Instead, you act with the attitude that *you* know how best to map these terraces & I do not. Such an attitude is high-handed & 'superior' (quote-marks as not necessarily accurate) & bound to cause aggravation & conflict. You need to fix this attitude, Jerry, as it rejects newcomers & is detrimental to the project as a whole.

> (different points of view) are best substantiated by widespread practice in OSM
The entire point is that there is NOT any “widespread practice” for these particular terraces. There is “widespread practice” for how-to map terraces. There is “widespread practice” for how-to map apartment blocks. There is zero practice for how-to map 2-level apartments built within lengths of 3-level terraces.

It is perfectly reasonable for you to point out that the flats appear rather narrow on the map. It is perfectly unreasonable for you to stomp all over what I've done, telling me that it is all wrong and should be mapped 'ideally this way' as if you are the authority on what is right. You are not the authority; there is zero established practice in mapping these particular buildings. Please start behaving like a collaborator rather than a foreman. It is more accurate to your position & you will get better results from those that you deal with, and particularly when dealing with crusty old men like me.
literan (2017-03-13 11:47:23+00:00): привет! полагаю, название моста (хоть official, хоть нет) надо ставить на его контур. А на линию улицы надо ставить название улицы, которая проходит по мосту.
SLMapper (2022-12-30 13:35:10+00:00): Hallo @aseerel4c26. Ich habe gerade den von dir eingetragenen Radweg in einen Feldweg zurückverwandelt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/130687255
Es gibt dort kein Radwegschild, aber stattdessen ein motorvehicle=no und land. Verkehr frei. Es ist also ein Feldweg.
Liebe Grüße
bhousel (2017-03-12 22:28:36+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
schleuss (2017-03-12 21:16:34+00:00): this is actually edits in rural Arkansas... adding Crooked Creek and adjusting a road and bridge
trampintheforest (2017-03-12 21:21:05+00:00): changeset-kommentar falsch;
richtig: tag bicycle: yes ergänzt
aseerel4c26 (2017-03-13 06:48:52+00:00): Willkommen! :-) 

Notiz für andere: Ich glaube, hier ein Gebäude unabsichtlich geändert worden - ich habe dazu eine Mail geschrieben.
aseerel4c26 (2017-03-13 22:20:10+00:00): Teilrevertiert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46825441 .
Weide (2017-03-13 05:57:04+00:00): Bitte public_transport=station durchlesen! http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Public_Transport&oldid=625726#Station
Nakaner (2017-05-15 20:06:09+00:00): Hallo Busbahnhof,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz drei Gleise mit service=spur getaggt. Meintest du das ernst oder war das eine Fehlbedienung der Taggingvorlagen des iD-Editors? service=siding wird für Anschlussgleise (in Bahnhöfen sowie bei Anst und Awanst) genutzt.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Busbahnhof (2017-05-16 11:22:06+00:00): Hallo Michael,
ich weiß nur noch, dass das durchgehende Gleis im Verlauf unterschiedlich getaggt war... Du kannst es gerne als Ganzes nochmal kontrollieren/korrigieren.
Beste Grüße
"Busbahnhof"
MichaelVL (2017-03-13 06:34:23+00:00): Det her ligner ikke en park?
TourenbikerFKB (2017-08-02 21:55:28+00:00): Hallo gerdipp, 
schön daß du zur Vervollständigung des Radwegnetzes in Openstreet beiträgst. Du hast aber leider vergessen, die Kreuzungspunkte mit anderen Wegen und Straßen vergessen zu mappen. Das ist aber wichtig, wenn das Routing richtig funktionieren soll. Wenn du Hilfe brauchst, kannst du mich gerne ansprechen oder dich an das Forum wenden: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14. Sollte der Weg ein kombinierter Rad/Fußweg sein (ist in vielen Fällen üblich), müßte er auch anders gemappt werden:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath
DD1GJ (2017-08-02 22:30:05+00:00): Der R18 ist in diesem Bereich als Relation auf dem eigentlichen Straßennetz vorhanden, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1532524

gerdipp hat einfach nochmal einen Radweg unmittelbar daneben gemalt, vermutlich damit die Bezeichnung auf der Standardkarte erscheint. Diese Edits sollten zeitnah zurückgesetzt werden.
TourenbikerFKB (2017-08-02 22:46:33+00:00): Ja, das habe ich dann nach Absenden des Kommentars auch gesehen. kannst du das mit dem revert übernehmen, darin bin ich nicht fit.
DD1GJ (2017-08-02 22:47:11+00:00): Nachtrag: Teilweise ist auf Digital Globe (Standard) ein abgesetzter Fuß/Radweg neben der Straße zu erkennen, aber die meisten Strecken sind doppelt. Es ist ein ziemliches Chaos,
eggie (2017-03-13 08:14:55+00:00): Arne  "Welkom op OSM”

Waarschijnlijk tussendoor geglipt met de welkomstmail. Bij deze dan...

Mapsme edits graag controleren met JOSM of er nu geen dubbele adresnodes staan svp.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
Hjart (2017-03-12 22:09:34+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag indtil videre
"Lærkeparken" ligner en række private haver. Er det med henblik på bedre Pokemon spawns?
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:33:17+00:00): I had to revert this changeset:
1. landuse=residential was already there for a much larger area
2. there isn't a continuous parking area south of the Verbernelaan
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 22:52:23+00:00): Welkom op OSM

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:16:56+00:00): Al je wijzigingen zijn teruggedraaid. Het waren meestal geen verbeteringen, maar verslechteringen van de kaart.

Als je serieus verbeteringen wilt aanbrengen, graag. Maar doe het dan rustig aan, controleer eerst grondig.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:08:59+00:00): Teruggezet.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:08:29+00:00): Teruggezet.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:07:46+00:00): Teruggezet.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:00:24+00:00): Teruggezet.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:06:54+00:00): Teruggezet.
MichaelVL (2017-03-13 06:41:03+00:00): Det her ligner heller ikke en park. Det meste er asfalt så vidt jeg kan se!
osmviborg (2017-03-13 07:41:03+00:00): Asfalt jungle, det er København.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:06:08+00:00): Teruggezet.
RoterEmil (2017-03-16 14:55:36+00:00): Hallo 'ayderya89', bereits vor einiger Zeit hatte ich Mitstreiter in eurem Projekt angeschrieben, da das Mülleimer-Tagging m.E. nicht mit den allgemein bei OSM akzeptierten Regeln vereinbar ist. Leider gab es von ihrer Seite keinerlei Reaktion... Nun führst Du genau das selbe Verfahren fort und taggst z.B. name=* für Mülleimer. Um mich hier nicht zu wiederholen, verweise ich auf meine anderen Changeset-Kommentare: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43731398 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44050172. Ich bitte Dich, auf meine Hinweise möglichst kurzfristig zu reagieren und Dich mit den Mitstreitern entsprechend abzusprechen. Danke dafür und gutes Gelingen für euer Projekt
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:05:20+00:00): Teruggezet.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 22:59:11+00:00): Teruggezet.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:04:42+00:00): Teruggezet.
gunslingerOSM (2017-03-13 00:09:42+00:00): Waarom mag dit speeltuintje niet op de kaart?
user_3216889 (2017-03-13 11:38:33+00:00): Speelplek is OK, naam erbij niet.
Is nu weer toegevoegd.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:04:04+00:00): Teruggezet.
gunslingerOSM (2017-03-13 00:10:14+00:00): Waarom mag dit speeltuintje niet op de kaart?
user_3216889 (2017-03-13 11:38:36+00:00): Speelplek is OK, naam erbij niet.
Is nu weer toegevoegd.
woodpeck_repair (2017-03-12 23:24:24+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 46792959, 46793460, 46794038, 46794603, 46795156.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:02:58+00:00): Teruggezet.
gendy54 (2017-03-25 15:10:51+00:00): Bonjour,

J'en ai profité pour supprimer le doublon et rajouter les tags qui vont bien
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:02:21+00:00): Teruggezet.
mueschel (2017-03-13 21:23:59+00:00): Hi,
found 3 ways with all strange tags like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480097548
Could you check & correct this?

Jan
EnigmaQuip (2017-03-13 21:54:00+00:00): Fixed, sorry about that
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:01:41+00:00): Teruggezet.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 22:58:24+00:00): Teruggezet.
gunslingerOSM (2017-03-13 00:08:57+00:00): Wat is er mis met deze wijziging?
user_3216889 (2017-03-13 11:26:53+00:00): Je had een stuk gras in het Hofpark omgezet in park. Een park is een groter geheel: omvat stukken met landuse=grass, forest, natural=water (vijvers), paden etc.
Het hele Hofpark was al gemarkeerd als park.
gunslingerOSM (2017-03-13 11:32:21+00:00): Hoe had ik dat kunnen zien? Daar heb ik naar gezocht. 
Of is dat dan een extra eigenschap van al die kleinere onderdelen?
user_3216889 (2017-03-13 11:51:52+00:00): Is geen eigenschap van de kleinere onderdelen, maar een aparte lijn om alle onderdelen heen. Is inderdaad niet altijd makkelijk snel te zien.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 22:57:45+00:00): Je doet maar wat, lijkt het. Dit wordt teruggedraaid.
user_3216889 (2017-03-12 23:17:19+00:00): Al je wijzigingen zijn teruggedraaid. Het waren meestal geen verbeteringen, maar verslechteringen van de kaart.

Als je serieus verbeteringen wilt aanbrengen, graag. Maar doe het dan rustig aan, controleer eerst grondig.