piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MikeySaugstad (2021-04-05 22:34:40+00:00): Hi! I'm just wondering what part(s) of the changes you reverted were an issue. The stated reasoning was the use of old aerial imagery, but I made very few edits to the actual geometries of roads. I was mostly just modifying the road classification; a bunch of streets were marked as "unclassified" that probably should be "tertiary" or "residential". And I don't really expect that to be incorrect due to old imagery.
MerlinPendragon (2021-04-05 22:40:49+00:00): My intention was to revert changes to the service roads near the Kuhn Honors and Scholars House / Pomerene Hall and the connection between W 18th Ave and Magruder Avenue. I try not to touch road classifications (since they're often pretty ambiguous), though I don't think that any of the smaller roads through campus would meet the tertiary standards. W 18th Avenue between Neil and College Rd definitely is a pedestrian street though.
MikeySaugstad (2021-04-05 23:26:15+00:00): Oh man, you're right about Kuhn Honors and Scholars house, my bad there! Based off of how road classifications are used elsewhere, I think that they could be classified as at least residential if not tertiary. Does that seem about right to you?
MerlinPendragon (2021-04-05 23:41:51+00:00): I believe they were residential before I changed them to unclassified a while ago. Again, the definitions of road classifications seem to be uncomfortably up for interpretation, but it didn't feel right calling them residential when nobody lives on them.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
FraukeLeo (2021-08-07 21:26:13+00:00): Hallo LightSpirit, du hast hier die B 274 um 1,5 m nach Süden verschoben. Das war aber vorher genauer :) Bitte keinem Luftbild einfach so glauben, immer erst mit GPS-Spuren vom Server vergleichen. Die stimmen hier mit dem alten Esri-Clarity-Bild exakt überein, das neue Esri-Bild ist gut 1 Meter nach Süden versetzt. Siehe https://ibb.co/dW0LzSy
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-30 14:04:18+00:00): would you be fine with lamp_type=led tagging?

see https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/poll-led-vs-led/138681/
Johnwhelan (2026-01-27 01:39:12+00:00): Most Ottawa LED have nom been switched to led.
Glassman (2021-04-05 23:50:19+00:00): #TIP: the area=yes tag usually isn't needed. For example, piers are okay drawn as a line or a polygon.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102359197
funwhilelost (2021-04-06 00:18:03+00:00): Ah, thanks for the feedback Glassman.  I'll have to see how to draw that using iD or change it after using the area tool.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102359197
nevw (2021-04-05 23:43:57+00:00): Hi
you have tagged a property boundary as a building.
I have used the conventional osm tags instead....
shifted house tags from commercial property boundary to house, added building polygons and driveway.
FooF0x (2021-04-05 23:52:02+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for taking the time to review the changes and improve them.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
cheatach (2021-04-06 11:19:42+00:00): Nawet jeśli to nic więcej niż drogi gruntowe? Możesz wysłać jakiś link z uzasadnieniem tego?
voltairovicz (2021-04-06 11:37:47+00:00): Jest kilka powodów ku temu, przede wszystkim highway=track ma przeznaczenie takie, by stosować go na drogach polnych, leśnych i innych takich dróg poza terenem zabudowanym, gdzie nie ma żadnych domów, nie jest to żadna istotna droga dojazdowa. Natomiast w terenie zabudowanym, czyli na osiedlach, które tu widzimy powinno się uzyc albo residential, albo service, albo podjazdów, jesli droga prowadzi do jednej działki. Od tego by oznaczyć nawierzchnię jest tag surface. Słyszałem, że niektóre nawigacje, np. Yanosik, nie chce prowadzić po drogach track (bo uwaza track za takie, po ktorych lepiej samochodów nie kierować najwidoczniej), zresztą one sie nie pokazują, nie renderują w tej aplikacji. Mam nadzieję, że ktoś jeszcze dołączy się do tej dyskusji i wytłumaczy ci dokładniej. Sam się dopiero niedawno o tym dowiedziałem i wcześniej robiłem to źle
maraf24 (2021-04-06 15:19:22+00:00): Dział to też w drugą stronę - droga asfaltowa służąca za dojazd do pól to track.
Np. tutaj - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/251331393 - powinien być track, a nie service.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
flohoff (2021-09-20 08:55:51+00:00): Moin,
wie kommst du eigentlich drauf das das alles Schiffheide ist?

Also vor allem auch die Waldschnipsel im Autobahnkleeblatt?

Ich kenne den Wald Östlich des Kiefernweges bis zur Bundesstraße nur als Schiffheide. (Mein Vater wohnt am Kiefernweg)

Flo
nochwirrererbuchstabensalat (2021-09-25 09:30:59+00:00): Moin! Das findet sich so in der Amtlichen Basiskarte. In der ist komplett alles rund um das Autobahnkreuz mit Schiffheide bezeichnet. Bei den Waldschnipseln im Autobahnkleeblatt geb ich zu, dass die vielleicht doch nicht zwingend dazu gehören müssen.
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-09 22:08:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102672593 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 23:52:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108549522 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some allegedly google-source changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105322114
user_3022894 (2021-04-09 09:28:31+00:00): Hi pkn,

zu den neu erstellten Eisenbahnbrücken an der Hohenzollernstraße: Das hast du denke ich richtig gemacht, da das dort Brücken zu sein scheinen. Aber bitte beim nächsten Mal dann daran denken, das tunnel=yes und layer=-1 von der darunterliegenden Straße zu entfernen, da wir sonst Brücke über Tunnel "doppelt gemoppelt" haben (habe das in diesem Fall bereits erledigt).

Viele Grüße, Lukas
pkn (2021-04-09 13:52:43+00:00): Hi Lukas,

danke das Du es korrigiert hast. Ich habe es schlicht übersehen.

An der Stelle bin ich schon so oft durchgefahren (https://kartaview.org/details/2732510/174/track-info) und habe mich immer geärgert, dass das falsch getaggt ist. In GE ist aber eh noch jede Menge zu tun. Allein dieses Changeset beinhaltet über 2000 Objektänderungen und es bleibt immer noch jede Menge zu erledigen.

Viele Grüße
Peter
user_3022894 (2021-04-09 20:33:39+00:00): Hi Peter,

oh ja, das ist sicher so, dass es noch viel zu tun gibt. Es wird ja auch immer noch Neues gebaut usw...

Okay dann viel Erfolg weiterhin!
Viele Grüße
Lukas
Jose Luis Infante (2021-04-06 08:23:12+00:00): Hola!
Por favor, revisa la edición, que uno de los edificios y el acceso al parking han quedado muy deformados.
Un saludo!
udyat (2021-04-06 10:02:26+00:00): Hola Jose Luis,
Gracias por el aviso, se me había pasado que había desplazado esa parte sin querer. Ya está hecha la corrección (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102396031).
¡Saludos!
philippec (2021-08-04 17:48:07+00:00): Heb ik het juist dat dat het fonteintje is ?
Is er iets speciaals over te zeggen ?
De verkeerde kant is getrokken.
dentonny (2021-08-05 20:09:14+00:00): Ja maar ik zal er een van de dagen eens een betere mapillary van nemen.

Trouwens bij mijn weten moet enkel de key van mapillary in de tag staan. Niet de hele url.
philippec (2021-08-06 02:41:31+00:00): Ja dat weet ik.
Dat was het voorstel van een paar theoretici, maar op die manier had ik nooit kunnen werken.
Nu twijfel ik hoe het zit in Osmand.
dentonny (2021-08-09 10:28:01+00:00): uit de wiki:

"This key uses the unique key Mapillary assigns to each photo, not a direct link. The reason for adding the key and not the full URI is that the URI might change (and already did in the past), but the key will stay the same."
SekeRob (2021-04-08 08:06:26+00:00): Hi and thanks for letting the world know. While you're at it, think you might want to look at tower:type=Cellular_tower too.

ciao
blackboxlogic (2021-04-09 01:14:27+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for improving the map. It would be nice to get this whole bike trail mapped (I did some of it further south). I'm a little concerned that it looks like you made the bike path directly ON TOP of the train tracks. It would be better for the two paths to be separate and next to each other, like they are in real life. This might be hard to do because you connected them along their length so it might be easiest to fix this by deleting the bike trail and re-drawing it. Please let me know if you need help fixing this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102360734
RobNicholson (2021-05-09 09:56:12+00:00): Thank you for adding the tracks to Shelley Road Park (664 Lake Manchester Rd). I visited today thinking it hadn't been mapped (my offline maps were updated before you added the tracks). Cheers
niobium-fronds (2021-05-09 23:35:43+00:00): Yeah, I knew there were trails there but nothing on the mapping so went and picked up as many as I could.  I think they're all covered now.
Nearby0051 (2021-04-06 01:10:05+00:00): good job!
mneko (2021-04-06 01:57:14+00:00): That's what happens when I have josm & iD both open and forget which one i'm using lmao
dieterdreist (2023-01-12 09:37:41+00:00): Hallo Berjk, ich habe bemerkt dass Du hier den Albstadt-node umgetaggt hast von "municipality" zu "town". Das ist das tagging für eine "echte" Stadt im Siedlungssinn. Bei Albstadt, wie Dir zweifellos bekannt sein dürfte, handelt es sich nicht um eine Siedlung sondern um ein Verwaltungskonstrukt, bestehend aus mehreren Siedlungen. Das tagging als place=town ist daher nicht passend.
Gruß Martin
pitscheplatsch (2021-04-06 16:19:12+00:00): Should be reverted, see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=102361826#19/21.55434/39.21902

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
mariotomo (2021-06-29 23:24:30+00:00): Hi Anton!  whenever you want to do more, please! much of Chiriquí is quite a nightmare, and it's pleasant to find that there's someone else rowing in the same direction. or if you have ideas where I can find volunteers?
Anton Khorev (2021-06-30 13:17:09+00:00): I edited this place because it was close to highways with names to be redacted. One of orchards was mapped twice:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/234333295/history  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/633714967/history
MJohnson92 (2021-04-06 02:19:12+00:00): Reference: NGA REF NO. U S G S X 2 4 K 1 1 1 3 6
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 23:52:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108549522 where the changeset comment is: Undoing some allegedly google-source changes. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105322114
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-04-06 12:58:13+00:00): voce percebeu o q fez aqui? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6422231193
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 00:15:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103121007 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted about their edits but problems still persist.
Mostafa Ahangarha (2021-04-27 07:32:16+00:00): You have displaced a node by 200m

I have fixed it but please be careful
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 16:22:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103279281, 103272291, 103282399, 103275191, 103277328, 103280981 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comment, newer edits still problematic.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 16:22:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103279281, 103272291, 103282399, 103275191, 103277328, 103280981 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comment, newer edits still problematic.
Kha_nam (2021-04-08 07:32:57+00:00): Hi linchenhui
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 29192437
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102535599
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102362876
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-26 22:35:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103663230 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  The most recent edits of this user are still problematic.
ash_win (2021-04-08 09:30:36+00:00): Hi teckhui,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 902929260,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102548602
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102363047
Kha_nam (2021-04-08 08:55:29+00:00): Hi linchenhui
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 114913136
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102544232
Thank you
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102363149
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 00:15:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103121007 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, the mapper has been contacted about their edits but problems still persist.
ash_win (2021-04-09 06:21:36+00:00): Hi ychiu,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road and it was done by MountTyree. Kindly check with way 116455449
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102393084
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102363574
ash_win (2021-04-09 06:11:35+00:00): Hi YAOYAOCHEN_M,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road and it was done by BayOfZekreet.Kindly check with way 28908049
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102405435
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102363583
ash_win (2021-04-09 05:52:55+00:00): Hi YAOYAOCHEN_M,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road and it was done by BayOfZekreet.Kindly check with way 926439195
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102405435
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102363840
ash_win (2021-04-09 05:40:38+00:00): Hi YAOYAOCHEN_M,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road and it was done by BayOfZekreet. Kindly check with way 28089951
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102405435
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102363952
ash_win (2021-04-09 05:20:54+00:00): Hi Claudine Wang,
Aligned the primary and unclassified segment as per ground truth as it was overlapping with other road segment,
Kindly check with node 8074279154
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102605815
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102364016
stephankn (2021-06-30 07:15:35+00:00): do not invent major highways in the middle of rice fields way 926444183
Himké (2021-04-06 03:16:46+00:00): details and updates
stephankn (2021-06-30 07:19:22+00:00): not residential. Overlaps existing way. way 926444800
stephankn (2021-06-30 07:17:46+00:00): track. unconnected. way 926445048
OddlyAngled (2021-04-07 15:34:29+00:00): doh, it is incorrectly labeled in the current US Topo maps. the older quads are correct.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102364701
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:31:38+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
thaontv (2021-04-06 07:10:00+00:00): Đại lộ Thăng Long
jonorossi (2021-04-07 06:10:02+00:00): Isn't there a painted dashed line between the 2 roundabouts, so lane_markings=no isn't applicable here?
ash_win (2021-04-08 13:17:32+00:00): Hi maning,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 926456733,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102567507
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102366233
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 16:22:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 103279281, 103272291, 103282399, 103275191, 103277328, 103280981 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  No reply to previous changeset comment, newer edits still problematic.
ZeLonewolf (2021-04-06 04:27:39+00:00): Intended changeset comment: fixing Los Alamos boundary
ash_win (2021-04-08 09:05:49+00:00): Hi rainbowchan,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 124152123,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102545988
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102368547
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:32:04+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
marczoutendijk (2023-11-19 20:03:51+00:00): natural=pond is not correct
Should be:
natural=water
water=pond
Protoxenus (2023-11-20 09:04:53+00:00): changed
Negreheb (2021-05-25 08:22:58+00:00): Servus 2worte, ist da bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8597541804/history ein Schild mittem im Feld, wo die Nummer drauf steht? :) Oder hast du da mit dem adress-helper gearbeitet und dann den bev-tag gelöscht? 

Vielleicht magst du die Gebäude da an der Straße einzeichnen, den Parkplatz da rauslöschen (oder mit access=private versehen) und die Hausnummer aufs Gebäude verschieben? 

Wenn du hier Infos oder Tipps brauchst, dann kann ich dir gern helfen, aber da du schon in JOSM arbeitest, findest du dich da sicher schon gut zurecht :)

Viele Grüße
3Worte (2021-05-30 21:39:40+00:00): Sehr geehrter Herr Bernhard Vockner.
Sie werden es nicht für möglich erachten, dass ich an diesem Tag die in der Nähe befindliche Panoramaweg Hängebrücke besucht habe, und an der von Ihnen genannten Stelle sich nun ein neu errichteter Pferdestall befinden. An jener Stelle wo sich vordem ein Gebäude befand, gibt es nun einen öffentlichen Parkplatz.

Grüße nach Salzburg
Negreheb (2021-05-30 23:20:32+00:00): Keine Ahnung wo du "Bernhard Vockner" herhast Johann Haag, aber du solltest nicht die gleiche Anschuldigung mit unterschiedlichen Accounts benutzen ;)

Solltest du, 2worte, wieder erwarten doch nicht Johann sein: Ah, verstehe, ja dann hat sich hier eh alles geklärt und da braucht natürlich nix verschoben werden, wenn du da vor Ort warst :)
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-13 09:24:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102855960 where the changeset comment is: remove erroneous data (overlapping and oddly shaped buildings in unlikely locations etc)
woodpeck_repair (2021-04-13 09:24:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 102855960 where the changeset comment is: remove erroneous data (overlapping and oddly shaped buildings in unlikely locations etc)
DressyPear4 (2021-04-07 09:54:08+00:00): Olá, não há necessidade de adicionar vias por cima das que já existem.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102371375
user_5359 (2021-04-06 15:57:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the value of the key water_source is written in lowercase characters. 

Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
ash_win (2021-04-08 13:10:17+00:00): Hi julialiu,
Aligned the Service segment as per ground truth as it was overlapping with other road segment,
Kindly check with way 864612171
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102567024
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102372611
Irfandi IRM-ED (2022-12-01 01:52:16+00:00): Hi, I readjusted your building because it doesn't match satellite image
ash_win (2021-04-08 13:02:56+00:00): Hi teckhui,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with residential road 
kindly check with way 903280351,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102560822
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102374021
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-04-06 07:53:15+00:00): Не нужно так делать.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-17 15:29:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103106631 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.  In this case, they have been contacted several times previously and even the most recent building edits still have problems.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4919 etc.
ElliottPlack (2021-11-11 21:37:21+00:00): fixed this!