piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2015-09-20 10:40:44+00:00): Hi, it'd be really helpful if your changesets didn't cover most of the planet and described what had actually been changed.  It's also useful to explain to relatively experienced mappers what the problem was and why you fixed it, so that they don't make the same mistake again.
grin (2015-09-20 17:50:16+00:00): Hi! Since you have used plural would you be so kind to point out my "changesets" which cover most of the planet? I'm sure you have dozens to point to. :-) 

As for this _one_ changeset please notice that it contains _four_ individual objects. You are expected to be able to check manually what's it about (if you cannot please tell me and I'll gladly help). But even if you don't, the description really tells it all: Fix, Place, Typos. It contains a "fix" for "typos" in the "place" key's values. And really exactly that, and only that. You surely don't expect me to include the changes itself in the changeset?

Also examining the change you may realise that it's worldwide since the typos were worldwide, and few in numbers. 

So as much as I would like to help you I see no way to do it differently next time. If you do, please tell me and I'll try to do it better next time. 

Thanks!
SomeoneElse (2015-09-21 11:39:17+00:00): Well, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32751596 is of a similar size.  I only spotted the ones that appeared in the history list where I am (East Midlands of England) - there may be others; I haven't looked.

A more descriptive changeset comment here might have been 'changed place=Farm to place=farm (the value for "place" tags conventionally is all lowercase)'.  With "fix place typos" it's not clear that "place" is actually a tag here; someone might have spelt a recurring name of a place wrong.

The problem with very wide changesets is that they occur on everyone's history tab, and make it less useful as a tool to find local edits for everybody as a result.  With only four items, it really wouldn't have been that much extra work to do it in four changesets.
grin (2015-09-21 13:33:30+00:00): Two is still not a lot. You probably cannot find a dozen since 2008. :-)

Two sidenotes: 1) History tab is completely useless, exactly for that reason. Use WhoDidIt or achavi or other tools which draw bounding boxes around real edits and not the maxed out area. 

2) you probably see that it was a semi-automated edit through Level0 and you may have guessed (since you didn't look) that there were a few similar tag repairs on the _worldwide_ map. Writing separate, extremely detailed descriptions for changes containing just a few objects is just not realistic. As you say: checking a changeset with only four object "really wouldn't have been that much extra work". :-)
But next time I'll try to put even more description in it, okay?
(If you wonder: these fixes were based on taginfo and visibly mistyped tags. Worldwide. And I usually don't touch it if there's more than a dozen or isn't absolutely visible that it wasn't intentional. Part of the QA efforts. Try it sometimes. :-))
Ps: I only wish that those 90%+ of the edits would possess ANY description at all! :-/
Tomas_J (2023-07-11 08:11:57+00:00): Ahoj, pre osobu, ktoru socha/doska zobrazuje alepo popisuje pouzivaj sekundarne odkazy - viz.:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:wikipedia
glibbertorsten (2025-04-05 09:33:59+00:00): Hallo! Ich bin grad über das fixme in dem Naturschutzgebiet gestoßen https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5380207. Von Anfang an sthet das "inaccurate" in der Relation - warum?
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
py_berrard (2015-10-17 17:44:03+00:00): des boîtes postales en doublon dans le secteur. à vérifier et corriger.
Warin61 (2022-01-31 00:59:08+00:00): Flat Products Medical Centre ... does not appear to be a hospital... I have removed that tag and left the name and building...
Zhent (2022-01-31 09:57:34+00:00): Well it is still being used as a medical centre with triage capabilities, albeit with less focus on emergency care, so how would you like to tag it?
Warin61 (2022-01-31 10:12:35+00:00): Clinic? Or doctors? 
"Triage capabilities' .. my local doctor does that too .. when required. 
Do you have a web link for them .. I could not see one.
Zhent (2022-02-02 01:46:04+00:00): A doctor and nurse is on duty at certain times. It is an internal private medical centre and not accessible but the public in any event.
Suggest
amenity=clinic
operator=BlueScope
access=permit
Warin61 (2022-02-02 07:56:06+00:00): Hey, thanks for that ... 
but osm clinic = 10 or more of doctors, nurses and associated staff. Clinics offer outpatient care, diagnosis, radiology, treatment, and sometimes urgent care

so amenity=doctors would be more appropriate. Now I've go to go back and check my clinic entries! Doh!
tomhukins (2015-07-20 16:10:14+00:00): Thank you for your work on mapping the outlines of several churches around Wimbledon.

I notice you leave the existing node on the map, but then add an outline around it for the building.  There's no easy way for tools to know the node and the area describe the same thing, so can I suggest you consider the advice in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element ?
sdoerr (2018-09-29 07:01:00+00:00): I'm just wondering whether there's any reason to have both a node and a way for St Paulinus' Church? I'm thinking of transferring the tags from the node to the way (building) and removing the node.
smb1001 (2018-09-29 17:01:45+00:00): Years ago when I wasn't so familiar with OSM, I tended to copy however things were done in a particular area, and someone had done dozens with both a node and a way. Now, having been told off by others, I go round doing exactly what you say and transferring the tags to the building!
sdoerr (2018-09-29 21:05:19+00:00): Thanks. I've now done that.
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
naoliv (2015-07-20 12:39:31+00:00): STOP doing that, please
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32754143 where the changeset comment is: Reverting name:hu in South America
SomeoneElse (2015-07-20 22:48:43+00:00): Hi - perhaps it would help to add a tag other than just name to http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3658893728 - tourism=attraction perhaps?
a3nm (2015-07-23 07:49:48+00:00): That's correct, I added that. Thanks!
aTeXuN (2015-07-20 12:54:42+00:00): Split Ethan Drive to create Emile Ct. Originally showed Ethan Dr. as connecting to Lockwood Lane. Emile connects to Lockwood.
maraf24 (2015-09-02 22:27:20+00:00): Dziecko, kiedy skończysz te zabawy?
Hjart (2015-07-20 20:59:33+00:00): Ah, jeg undrede mig over størrelsen i forhold til overskriften på rettesættet, uden dog at se nærmere på det :)
SK53 (2015-07-20 18:37:39+00:00): I'm rather puzzled by these additional roads you added. From memory it's not possible to turn from New Quay directly into Chapel Street & only left turns allowed in coming from Chapel St. A quick check on the Bing imagery confirms this memory. Has the junction been changed recently?

If not, I'd appreciate an idea why you think these roads are necessary.
naoliv (2015-07-20 13:38:48+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 32749386, 32748119, 32753227, 32748216, 32752069, 32752506, 32748162, 32753138, 32753071, 32751916, 32753082, 32751135, 32749021, 32748780, 32749642, 32752784, 32749461, 32751388, 32749259, 32748812, 32751737, 32752725, 32748244, 32752858, 32753153, 32748684, 32753233, 32752940, 32748310, 32752405, 32748437, 32748089, 32752878, 32749151, 32749318, 32753050, 32752050.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-20 23:19:06+00:00): Hello - has something gone a bit wrong here http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361419777 seems to stop dead on its way south.  When I was last here there was a fairly complicated junction (that was in OpenStreetMap previously) has it really been removed?
uryevich (2015-10-09 15:39:59+00:00): Может быть не все линии соединяются?
uryevich (2015-10-09 15:41:22+00:00): Вроде как точка 3658968649
Skippern (2015-07-20 14:38:35+00:00): Pelo meu conhecimento nao existe bancos drive-through no Brasil, esse etiqueta e desnecessário.
Quando ha etiqueta brand=Caixa não e necessário com operator=Caixa, e name=Caixa  também não e necessário. Isso so duplicando o informação.
rantanplan41 (2015-07-20 14:42:17+00:00): Ok. Concordo. Já houve ATM drive-trought em Vitoria. Não sei se ainda existe em outras cidades ou não.
Skippern (2015-07-20 15:50:24+00:00): Blz, se existem um ou duas dar para mapea-los com drive-through=yes, os outros não e necessário negar com drive-through=no. No Brasil, amenity=bank deve implicar o valor padrão, e somente mapea os poucos que tem com drive-through=yes
Skippern (2015-07-20 16:08:26+00:00): Se voce conheço o local desse atm drive-through seria bom se voce pode adiciona-lo no mapa. Quero conhecer :)
5m4u9 (2015-07-22 05:04:41+00:00): Otro genial aporte. Me asombra la cantidad de dentistas en pocas cuadras *-*. 

Tener más cuidado en los teléfonos, añadir entre +591 y el teléfono el prefijo 4 para que cualquier persona del mundo pueda llamar directo.

Hay un shop=books y estoy dudando que sea uno... creo que debe ser una "librería" que lo correcto es papelería (amenity=stationery).
Andrey Vlchev (2015-07-20 14:43:52+00:00): Тропа от шоссе до поляны на р. Цна
SomeoneElse (2015-07-22 23:44:23+00:00): Given the previous tagging of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353000458/history , would amenity=police perhaps be the correct tag here?
Extreme_KG (2015-07-20 14:59:12+00:00): Я живу в этом доме, правильный адрес 36/1Б
mueschel (2017-12-30 15:13:59+00:00): Hallo,
was bedeutet denn der Key "maxspeed:backward:FIXME"?
Gruss, Jan
Protoxenus (2018-01-01 11:29:29+00:00): Hi, ist zwar schon mehr als 2 Jahre her, aber ich kann mich erinnern, dass die eingetragene Vmax nicht mit der Realität übereinstimmte. Ich hatte damals aber kein Device mitlaufen, so dass ich die aktuellen Werte nicht erfasst hatte. Werde mich bemühen, das genau zu erfassen und einzutragen. Problem: Zeit.
Gruß Protoxenus
mueschel (2018-01-01 13:04:00+00:00): Alles klar, ich habe eine Note gesetzt. 
Laut Mapillary steht da zumindest irgendein rundes Schild kurz vor der Kreuzung, leider von hinten aufgenommen.
user_7581226 (2020-08-29 11:58:45+00:00): Hallo Supadomi, kannst Du Dir bitte folgende Diskussion über von Dir gemappte surfaces anschauen. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=70447

Grüße Johann
Jojo4u (2015-07-25 21:17:09+00:00): Guten Abend :)
Da ist ein leerer Way rausgekommen, du weißt sicher noch was das werden sollte.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361443805

Grüße
Peilscheibe (2015-07-26 17:09:47+00:00): Oh, der ist übriggeblieben. Ist jetzt weg, danke
5m4u9 (2015-07-21 02:13:35+00:00): Great. I improved changing area to point, and adding more data from fb page. Visiting the place, I'll add more data...
GerdP (2015-12-01 15:55:25+00:00): Hi there!
I've changed maxspeed=2 to lanes=2.
Do you know the correct maxspeed value?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238699432
woodpeck_repair (2015-07-20 17:34:08+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 32693747, 32695312, 32671996, 32693196, 32695100, 32695256, 32695700, 32690536, 32690898, 32691317, 32671390, 32695382, 32695424, 32694797, 32694681, 32695577, 32691199, 32691986, 32671836, 32690721, 32691444, 32691278, 32694896, 32690264, 32671678, 32691534, 32692797, 32691093, 32695691, 32691025, 32671140.
naoliv (2015-07-20 20:35:19+00:00): Can you stop, please?
naoliv (2015-07-20 21:18:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 32763457 where the changeset comment is: Reverting data duplication
naoliv (2015-07-20 21:36:38+00:00): And also in  #32764416
You deserve a medal for such mess...
GerdP (2015-12-01 08:23:41+00:00): Hi there!
Please try to correct the invalid attribute
oneway="no; yes"
for Rue Geoffroy de Montbray:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39326398
stefanct (2020-03-19 00:30:09+00:00): Wie kommst du auf diesen Namen?
BeKri (2015-07-21 06:19:18+00:00): Servus,
ich beziehe mich auf
Weg: 361464591 
Darf ich Dich fragen, woher Du weist (Quelle),
 dass das ein switchgear ist/ sein soll ?
Danke für mögliche Info
adjuva (2015-11-14 17:27:52+00:00): Es ist eine starke Vermutung.

Die Bahn hat das Unterwerk Passing zu Anfang des Jahrtausends erneuert. Dabei wird üblicherweise die 110-kV-Schaltanlage an ihrem Standort erneuert und die 15-kV-Schaltanlage in einem Betonfertighaus neu erstellt.

Wie alte Luftbilder zeigen hatte das alte Unterwerk kein Häuschen für die 15-kV-Schaltanlage. Diese war vermutlich im dem L-förmigen Gebäude nördlich vorhanden, an dessen Nord-Ost-Ecke auch ein großes Gerüst zur Abspannung der 15-kV-Speiseleitungen steht. Früher waren die 15-kV-Schaltanlagen an großen Bahnhöfen deutlich aufwändiger, größer und zum Teil mehrstöckig ausgeführt (siehe http://www.dl5mm.de/16_7_Hz_Oberleitungsnetz_eb_04__2004.pdf Seite 154 oben rechts).

Da ich nicht glaube, dass auch die neue Schaltanlage in diesem Gebäude errichtet wurde, bleibt nur ein neues Gebäude. Und der Vergleich mit alten Luftbildern zeigt, dass nur dieses Gebäude während des Umbaus neu erstellt wurde. Außerdem hat es die passende Form, Größe, Aussehen und Lage. Die Lage in der Nähe des Gerüsts passt, weil es deutlich mehr Speiseleitungen als Leitungen zu den Transformatoren gibt ()beide per Erdkabel angeschlossen). Und Form, Größe und Aussehen passen zu anderen Häuschen von DB Energie (z.B. way 203890481).

Ich hoffe geholfen zu haben.
Jojo4u (2015-07-21 07:25:35+00:00): Danke, das war schon länger offen. Zwei kleine Details:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337674602 -> durch das bicycle=unknown kommt man nicht zum 239,1022-10 am nördlichen Ende. Ich würde den 239,1022-10 bis zur Straße ziehen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337674591 kleiner Taggingfehler bei surface
Peilscheibe (2015-07-21 15:11:38+00:00): Nun, das bicycle=unknown war ja schon so getaggt und das habe ich so belassen, weil keine Beschilderung. Von Nordwesten her kommt man momentan mit dem Radl eh nicht legal bis zum Überweg, weil da noch ein z239 im Gebüsch steht. Man muß die ganze Ecke sowieso nochmal genau anschauen, sehr detailliert war ich hier nicht, hab nur die Hauptradroute 5 gesucht :-)
Der Taggingfehler ist ein Rätsel. Wer die fehlenden Buchstaben findet, darf sie eintragen ...
Peer van Daalen (2016-07-24 10:51:00+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Ddesignated
Andrej Zacharevicz (2015-07-22 18:02:34+00:00): Дзякуй!
Skippern (2015-07-20 20:51:20+00:00): Bom ver que voce trabalhando com as linhas de ônibus, mas favor não use nomes abreviadas, não use nomes maiúsculos, e favor entre em contato com o LucFreitas para sincronizar esse trabalho, ele também pode dar auxilio com o esquema de transporte publico, que também trabalhando com as mesmas.
Grato
paflopes (2015-07-20 20:53:46+00:00): Obrigado pelas informações, editarei os pontos que criei.
Skippern (2015-07-20 20:59:14+00:00): Favor também entra em contato com LucFreitas http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/LucFreitas que pode te ensinar como funciona o esquema do transporte publico, ele ja mapeou muitos deles no Vila Velha e Vitoria.
naoliv (2015-07-20 21:18:01+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 32759888.
Skippern (2015-07-20 20:58:24+00:00): Também, ponto ônibus deve ser no lado da rua, e não parte da rua.
letihu (2017-01-09 21:17:37+00:00): Das ist ja schön, das du 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3659404456/history
hinzugefügt hast.
Aber was soll das sein? Nur 
einen Namen vergeben ist zu wenig.
maraf24 (2015-07-22 20:16:27+00:00): A dlaczego tu by miało być 50km/h? Pomijam fakt, że to droga z zakazem ruchu, ale przecież tam w okolicy jest chyba strefa 30.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-21 23:30:03+00:00): Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3659454313 is really the intersection of the trunk road on the bridge and the smaller road below?
samely (2015-08-22 23:18:00+00:00): Hey there. Thanks for your feedback, definitely those roads don't intersect each other. I've already fixed my mistake: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33515239
Thank you again.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-23 23:30:14+00:00): For info I've added a note at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/402115 suggesting a local survey - what's there now is clearly wrong.
karitotp (2015-07-24 18:14:52+00:00): Thanks you!
eggie (2017-09-23 16:47:23+00:00): PB met "Opnieuw welkom bij OSM" gestuurd
Rui Oliveira (2015-07-21 13:43:38+00:00): Boa tarde.

Estas vias não podem ficar desligadas porque muitas pessoas usam os dados em tempo real para navegação por GPS e outras aplicações e eliminar estradas de acesso pode ser problemático. Sempre que gravares certifica-te que não deixes nenhuma estrada por ligar na zona que trabalhaste.
lezurdis (2015-07-21 21:07:10+00:00): Fiz a analise deste changeset, os detalhes estão na mailing list portuguesa :
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-pt/2015-July/001198.html

Se quiseres participar a conversa, podes fazer-lo na mailing list (basta inscrever-te) ou respondendo aqui. 

Encarrego-me de fazer as correções adequada para corrigir os 3 problemas identificados.
GerdP (2015-11-11 09:12:34+00:00): bitte prüfen:
ist das 
oneway=soon;signs already standing
noch immer kein "yes" ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32812735
Athemis (2015-11-11 16:36:11+00:00): Das ist inzwischen obsolet. Es gab hier auch mal eine Fehlernotiz an dieser Stelle,, die aber vor einigen Wochen mit dem sinngemäßen Hinweis "War vor Ort: Keine Einbahnstraße"  geschlossen wurde. Ich bin davon ausgegangen, dass dieser Mapper auch den Tag entfernt hat. Ich selbst habe in diesem Fehler vor vier Monaten nur angemerkt, dass es auf aktuellen Luftbildern (2014) anhand der Richtung der geparkten Autos und der in beiden Fahrtrichtungen auf die Straße gemalten "30" nicht nach Einbahnstraße aussieht. Da das aber inzwischen vor Ort bestätigt wurde (allerdings ohne das Tagging zu korrigieren...) ändere ich das jetzt mal ;)
Athemis (2015-11-11 16:38:14+00:00): Nebenbei, dieses "soon;signs already standing" war sechs Jahre lang an diesen Weg geklebt... Würde mich nicht wundern, wenn zwischendurch dort tatsächlich mal eine Einbahnstraße war, die dann wieder aufgehoben wurde. :-P
Athemis (2015-11-11 16:43:46+00:00): Fix in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35243732
GerdP (2015-11-11 17:17:46+00:00): Danke Dir. Sechs Jahre ist ja nicht soo lange, habe schon viel ältere Fehler gefunden, in dem ich mal in Taginfo die seltenen Tags durchgehe ;-)
SomeoneElse (2015-07-22 23:40:46+00:00): Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/248615815/history is really a residential building?  Previously the tags on it were somewhat contradictory, so perhaps a note here would make more sense than just removing some tags that may or may not be correct?
SomeoneElse (2015-07-21 12:12:10+00:00): Your edit to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/214140614 makes no sense here.  As mapped, it runs through a road.  It would be far better to try and engage with the previous mapper to try and understand what they were trying to do, and why they mapped it as they did, or if that doesn't work add a map note so that a local real mapper can survey it.
will_p (2015-07-21 10:24:42+00:00): This changeset looks problematic. You seem to have misunderstood that amenity=bar and bar=yes are not exactly equivalent.

If something is tagged as tourism=hotel and bar=yes, it indicates the feature is primarily a hotel, which happens to have a bar inside. For rendering purposes, it should be shown as a hotel. Your change has removed this important distinction.

If the mapper who added the feature in the first place considered the bar an important feature in its own right, they could have added it separately, but they chose not to.

A number of objects you have changed are also tagged with restaurant=yes, which is used in the same way.
Yorvik Prestigitator (2015-07-21 10:36:14+00:00): I have to agree with will_p, have you read the wiki that says the same as will_p is saying wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bar , for example should I edit all the bars that have toilets from toilets=yes to amenity=toilets?
SomeoneElse (2015-07-21 11:44:42+00:00): For the avoidance of doubt, I can categorically state that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331497978 is NOT an amenity=bar.  It's a hotel bar (serves a nice pint, but not really a pub because it's part of the hotel, though it does welcome walkers who aren't covered in mud)
SomeoneElse (2015-07-21 11:49:58+00:00): @Dr Kludge may I respectfully suggest that you revert this changeset, then get out of the armchair and go out and map something in the real world instead?  Any amount of fiddling with tags will never improve the volume of data within OpenStreetMap, and changes like this one actually reduce the quality of the data that real mappers have painstakingly collected.
Richard (2015-07-21 12:41:39+00:00): Or if you do want to continue armchair mapping, may I gently suggest the rural US - where there's hordes of bad imported TIGER data that needs clearing up.
Dr Kludge (2015-07-22 13:11:30+00:00): Nice guys comments guys.  It shows bunch of religion.  How about fixing the wiki then.  If I go to the bar page it redirects to amenity=bar.  Anyone could have fallen into this problem.

Tag:amenity=bar
(Redirected from Bar)
Yorvik Prestigitator (2015-07-22 13:38:26+00:00): Hi sorry if I came across as unfriendly, I guess frustration at someone undoing my work out of misunderstanding of tags. Perhaps your global scale made it look if you were changing things without knowledge of local circumstances.
I am not sure what you mean about the wiki redirecting, the link I gave (which didn't render as a link last time: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bar ) doesn't redirect to anywhere for me.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-22 23:31:54+00:00): I've reverted this in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32814810 .  Some items (including http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331497978 ) are now correctly tagged again.  Some may need further investigation (http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256683224 I suspect is an amenity=social_club, for example).  Note that a number of outdoor seating areas in Koeln had already been corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32814552 and weren't changed here.
Dr Kludge (2015-07-23 04:53:57+00:00): @Yorvik Prestigitator
1.) Go to the wiki.
2.) In the search area in the top right corner of the screen enter "bar" sans the quotes and hit the enter key.
3.) The page redirects to amenity=bar.
This behavior still exists at 7/22/2015 21:40 US time.

The end of my change set comment--This tag may have to remain.--hints at the problem of bar redirecting to amenity=bar that I was seeing and still seeing.

Now image how your response would be viewed by a brand new mapper who fell into the same issue of the page redirecting?  I'd say really hostile.  I do understand your frustration.  My intention was not to wreck you work.  Any chance that you could have sent me a question via the OSM messaging system before resorting to this kind-of forum?
ediyes (2015-07-21 19:29:33+00:00): Hi Rub21, con el cambio que acaba de subir los buildings se ven ortogonalizado. :)
Rub21 (2015-12-23 14:22:54+00:00): @ediyes, veo que si si estan alineados.