piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
oormilavinod (2017-06-05 06:47:03+00:00): Hey lestatlacry, welcome to OSM, nice to see that you are adding features to the map. but i observed that you have used a point data to depict a map. where as according to conventions we use a polygon to demarcate. hope you keep adding value to the map. Happy mapping
Baloo Uriza (2017-06-04 06:52:51+00:00): I see a new development there on Mapbox imagery, but this doesn't line up with that.  If you have local knowledge of the area, would you take another look?
kreuzschnabel (2017-06-03 20:57:06+00:00): Danke!
Martin Borsje (2017-06-03 21:13:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap (OSM)
Je hebt je aangemeld om een bijdrage te leveren en dat inmiddels ook gedaan. Je kunt je nu 'amateur-cartograaf' noemen; onderling gebruiken we meestal de term 'mapper';)
Elke mapper is allereerst en vooral waardevol vanwege lokale kennis. Het is juist die lokale kennis die OSM laat uitstijgen boven welk 'concurrent' dan ook. OSM is daardoor niet alleen beter, maar meestal ook veel actueler. Niet voor niets wordt OSM door veel instanties gebruikt. Daarom is het leveren van bijdragen aan OSM een serieuze zaak.
Graag aandacht voor de volgende punten:
1.	Er wordt meegekeken. In het begin worden je bijdragen bekeken door meer ervaren mappers. Ze zullen soms commentaar leveren, tips geven. Je krijgt dan automatisch een mail op het mailadres dat je bij aanmelding hebt opgegeven. Controleer dat dus regelmatig. En geef reactie op een commentaar, zodat duidelijk is dat je het hebt gelezen.
2.	Beperk jezelf. Alle begin is moeilijk en iedereen maakt fouten, zelfs de meest ervaren mappers. Maak niet meer dan een paar wijzigingen per dag in het begin. Maak niet in één sessie wijzigingen die ver uit elkaar liggen. Eventuele fouten kunnen dan snel en gemakkelijk hersteld worden.
3.	Nuttige links. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM (een introductiepagina met veel nuttige tips onder het kopje 'Waar moet je op letten als je de kaart gaat bewerken?') http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features (overzicht van vrijwel alle elementen die in OSM gebruikt worden) https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 (Nederlandstalig deel van forum; de plek om vragen te stellen en ideeën op te doen)
4.	Vragen staat vrij. Je kunt op het bovengenoemde forum terecht met vragen, maar ook altijd ondergetekende een PB sturen.
user_3216889 (2017-06-04 11:57:49+00:00): Highway=pedestrian alleen gebruiken bij voetgangerszone in (winkel)centrum. Dit is een gewoon voetpad. Layer=1 geldt bij een brug, daarvan is hier geen sprake.
Door mij gecorrigeerd.
user_3216889 (2017-06-03 23:13:52+00:00): Een enkel grasveld is geen park. Een park omvat gras, bomen/struiken, paden, vijvers etc.
user_3216889 (2017-06-03 23:16:16+00:00): Een enkel grasveld is geen park. Een park omvat gras, bomen/struiken, paden, vijvers etc.
Teun Ritzema (2017-06-04 15:01:50+00:00): Dan is dit wel degelijk een park. Er zijn paden, bankjes, bomen, struiken en er is zelfs een jou de boules baan.
GinaroZ (2017-06-03 22:01:46+00:00): Hi, noticed you added a note saying this bus stop is present and has been verified: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/502532560 - if so you should probably remove the naptan:verified tag. Same goes for other stops.
saintam1 (2017-06-04 06:55:43+00:00): Yeah, I've been wondering about that. I usually check the stop's name and location (and its existence), but I don't check any of the several other tags from the NaPTAN import. Does that still count as the stop being naptan:verified? I couldn't find a definition anywhere of what the criteria are for naptan:verified=yes. 

Is that what others do, just remove the tag once you've confirmed the stop exists?
GinaroZ (2017-06-04 23:06:10+00:00): Honestly I'm not too sure either - nothing much on any mailing lists, and the only real place it's mentioned in the wiki is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Surveying_and_Merging_NaPTAN_and_OSM_data

Looking at imported stops in Edinburgh without the verified tag, seems like they were removed 3 years ago by a mapper who probably just checked their existance https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/17791127

But since it's a NaPTAN tag, maybe it's just to check the stop is actually there?
saintam1 (2017-06-09 20:31:22+00:00): That makes sense. I think I'll start removing it from stops that I've surveyed. Thanks.
DD1GJ (2017-06-04 16:27:12+00:00): Hallo Kushn, willkommen bei OSM. Leider sind Deine Edits etwas unglaubwürdig. Ein Bach ist kein Fluss, ein Hausgarten ist kein Park und ein Wohnhaus ist keine normalerweise keine Kirche. Daher habe ich alles zurückgesetzt bzw. korrigiert.

http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/01/achtung-pokemon-alarm/

Wie die verschiedene Dinge richtig eingetragen werden, steht im Tutorial: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
kreuzschnabel (2017-06-10 06:42:59+00:00): May I ask why you changed the A46 classification from trunk to primary? According to http://ukroads.wikia.com/wiki/2-digit_primaries, it’s a primary A-road, which should be tagged highway=trunk in the UK while highway=primary means the "standard" A roads.
LAW3 (2017-06-10 08:19:39+00:00): The section I upgraded to primary, was upgraded to a dual carriageway, and to the best of my knowledge is now classed as a primary road. (As parts of the A46 are)

Aerial photography is still showing single carriageway/work in progress, so those who don't live 200 metres away may still class it as a trunk road. 

The wiki you referenced is also a user-contributed service so could also be incorrect. 
However if you feel it should be a trunk road, your welcome to change it back.
SomeoneElse (2017-06-10 10:27:42+00:00): Hi LAW3, and welcome to OSM!
The general rule in the UK for trunk roads and primary roads is green signs == trunk; white signs == primary.
In OSM a trunk road fits between motorway and primary, so a change from trunk to primary is a "downgrade", not an upgrade.  The A46 (especially post upgrade) is definitely a trunk road (driven it many times).
Incidentally, there's an East Mids OSM meetup soon: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nottingham/Pub_Meetup probably 20th June, probably the Lincolnshire Poacher in Nottingham.  With a bit of luck I'll be there - you're welcome too!
Best Regards,
Andy
LAW3 (2017-06-10 11:12:38+00:00): Cheers for explaining Andy. 
Pretty new to all this, 
Will change it when I get chance.
SomeoneElse (2017-06-10 12:59:13+00:00): No problem - any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask!
SK53 (2017-06-11 14:20:10+00:00): Will just add that around Flintham this section of road was updated just as soon as practicable after it opened, see my blog post from 6 years ago: http://sk53-osm.blogspot.co.uk/2011/05/along-fosse-way-mapping-new-road.html
bhousel (2017-06-05 03:13:55+00:00): Thank you for your contribution and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Martin Borsje (2017-06-03 21:13:45+00:00): PB gestuurd
user_3216889 (2017-06-03 23:08:06+00:00): Je kunt niet de website als naam gebruiken; naam en website zijn twee verschillende 'sleutels' (tags). Ik heb dit gecorrigeerd en verder shop=pet toegevoegd.
zstadler (2017-07-21 13:02:31+00:00): Is these new ways part of an officially marked ITC red trail?
.
It does not appear on the marked trails map or at the update page https://www.teva.org.il/?CategoryID=279&ArticleID=442
Mosh Feu (2017-07-21 14:25:37+00:00): Well, I don't know. I saw the marked stones in the trail and on the signposts.
cadsauxk (2017-06-05 21:38:19+00:00): Olá colega,

legal suas contribuições, seja bem vindo ao projeto.

Uma observação: coloque no campo "nome" somente aquilo que for nome próprio. Descrições como "Antiga Estrada Municipal Boa Esperança / Três Pontas" devem entrar no campo "descrição" (description).

abraço
hatul (2024-02-18 11:13:55+00:00): תודה על התרומות.
פארק הצנירים הוא לא גן לאומי אז בבקשה לא לסמן אותו כך.
rarad74 (2017-06-04 07:20:20+00:00): Salut. Ce anume este nonstop acolo? Ce categorie de magazin? Minimarket, magazin alimentar, magazin mixt, etc?
Razvan Iancu (2017-06-04 07:48:23+00:00): Magazin mixt
rarad74 (2017-06-04 09:15:08+00:00): Multumim.
user_3216889 (2017-06-03 22:46:03+00:00): Welkom per PB gestuurd.
user_3216889 (2017-06-03 22:50:40+00:00): Huisnummer 34 is een van de zeer vele in dit pand, dus je kunt niet dat nummer op het pand als geheel zetten.
Voor nummer 34 bestaat al een adresnode, maar je moet heel ver inzoomen om dat te kunnen zien (nrs. 2 t/m 102 op een kluitje).
Maps.me is helaas geen goede editor voor OSM.
Ik heb de wijziging ongedaan gemaakt.
BeKri (2017-10-04 21:57:34+00:00): Servus,
vielleicht kannst DU Dich noch erinnern ...
In der Dresdnerstraße /Leihgestern geht's auf BEIDEN Seiten die Nummern von 13-35
also ungerade, dös glaub i ned ganz.
eine Seite muss wohl von 2-x/gerade gehen.
Bei 35 und 35-39 gibt's auch ne (Gebäude)Überschneidung.
Gruss derBeKri
iz11 (2019-07-08 06:35:51+00:00): Szia!

2017-ben létrehoztál sok kanyarodási tiltást, amik a valóságban nem léteznek.
Lépcsőkre, ösvényekre, gyalogutakra.

Úgy tudom, hogy ezeket csak azért csináltad, mert az OsmAnd beállításokkal volt problémád, ami később megoldódott.
Mikor fogod ezeket törölni?

Néhány példa, csak a Pilis és Visegrádi-hegység környékéről:

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/openstreetmap-hungary/a_Wu1HTq59Y/teVAoszTEAAJ
yuryleb (2017-06-24 22:07:43+00:00): Вы знаете, что я не являюсь ярым противником разделения дорог на два направления, но в случае с улицей Рентгена - это явный перебор. Из каждого проулка там можно повернуть как направо на эту улицу, так и налево. Особенно я против разделения участка улицы от ул. Чапаева до Петроградской набережной - вы уверены, что опять не ошиблись там с запретами поворотов? И какой практический смысл разделения в данном конкретном случае?
Dinamik (2017-06-25 10:08:56+00:00): Здравствуйте! Насколько я помню, как минимум, в одном месте (у дома 44 по Петроградской набережной) есть примыкание без левых поворотов, и ещё, как минимум, в одном месте (у дома 23) есть разворот, по сути, без примыкания. То есть не всякий проулок соответствует поворотам и развороту. Если что-то прямо сейчас поменялось в ситуации с какими-то конкретными запретами, конечно, можно с ними разбираться.
yuryleb (2017-06-25 14:01:07+00:00): Единственный запрет налево - с Рентгена на набережную (и, соответственно с набережной на нее). Далее двойная сплошная на ул. Рентгена вся в разрывах напротив каждого выезда из двора, у дома 23 в том числе. На карте еще не выезды обозначены. И все это появилось не прямо сегодня, старым панорамам вполне можно верить.
Mondschein (2019-06-22 11:56:08+00:00): Guten Tag!  

"Zur Schlagge 7" wurde in diesem Änderungssatz doppelt eingetragen:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497946063  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4894408422  
Kann es sein, dass die zweite Hausnummer 7 zur Straße Eichkamp gehört?
Dalkvist (2017-06-04 02:56:01+00:00): Hi please refine the auto tracing before adding more, the data is low in both accuracy and precision and it is not following local tagging practices.  
There is basically no natural=wood in Sweden it is all part of active forestry so landuse=forest is the prefered tag this includes recently harvested/clear cut areas, they are sometimes tagged with natural=scrub as well.
 
Example[1][2]  [3][4]
1) it uses 20+ nodes in a zigzag pattern when the border is straight.
2) it is offset in a lot of places, looks like the mapbox data changes offset in the area.
3) clear cuts that are outside/excluded
 
4) it handles the scrub in power line areas badly
5) when the forest ends at the water's edge it is recommended that they share nodes or segments
 
Is there a way to lower the node count? The amount of nodes gives a false impression of accuracy and makes it harder to clean up/improve.  
 
After dealing with bad corine imports most of us are vary of semi-automatic stuff.
 
[1]https://osm.org#map=17/58.93891/16.49445
[2]http://i.imgur.com/0qHwOdv.png
[3]https://osm.org/#map=16/58.9421/16.5373
[4]http://i.imgur.com/RDpi9zV.png
Atakua (2017-06-04 10:13:54+00:00): Hej, tusen tack för din feedback! 

>There is basically no natural=wood 
Jag kommer att använda landuse=forest istället från och med nu. Det var oklart för mig förut.

Ang. 2): jag ska kolla att gränser mellan tracerad yta och bilder stämmer bättre utan avståndet.
Ang. 3), 4): också ska jag rensa data bättre i framtiden.

> Is there a way to lower the node count?
Jag änvander redan filterer ("simplify area" och "simplify line") innan jag börjar manuel redigering. Ändå man kan ändra filter-inställningar så att linjer har till och med mindre punkter.

Ang. 5): jag ska använda ContourMerge plugin för att slå ihop gränser — då ska det vara enkelt.
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:32:48+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
GerdP (2017-08-22 08:48:08+00:00): Hi!
Please check: What was meant with 
highway=foo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497946400
EAman (2017-08-22 10:41:10+00:00): Thanks for finding this. It was supposed to be "footway" and I guess I relied on autocompletion.
letihu (2017-12-01 19:32:56+00:00): Die neuen Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497946668/history
 sind ja ganz schön. Was ist denn mit diesem
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497946668/history
 Gebäude? Die Überschneiden sich ja.
Константин Гам (2018-11-01 13:42:28+00:00): Не стоит писать в name описательные характеристики "магазин-пекарня". Указывайте пожалуйста только название!
Sanniu (2017-06-28 07:17:19+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497950274 - is it roundabout?
Ynhockey (2017-06-28 11:25:11+00:00): Fixed.
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:32:45+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
PT-53 (2017-07-30 05:46:51+00:00): Hallo helis,
in keep right wird für diesen Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497952091 die Fehlermeldung "riverbank schneidet den highway " angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=85089221
Kümmerst Du Dich darum ?
Grüße
SimonPoole (2017-08-30 17:18:59+00:00): geoportal.ch is not a legitimate source for OpenStreetMap. 

Do not use third party sources which have not been confirmed as being suitable.

I'll be asking the DWG to redact this changeset.
SimonPoole (2017-08-30 17:19:54+00:00): geoportal.ch is not a legitimate source for OpenStreetMap. 

Do not use third party sources which have not been confirmed as being suitable.

I'll be asking the DWG to redact this changeset.
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:32:41+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
manoharuss (2017-06-05 05:52:10+00:00): Hi Itzscallywagyt,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But I am afraid I have revert your edits as these seem to be fictional anad non-existent on the ground.

May I suggest sticking to mapping existing features on the ground, as OSM aims to be a community driven, up-to-date map of the world.

Thank you,
Manohar
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-06-14 13:33:47+00:00): Bom dia, é incorreto mapear assim: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497963475/history passando a via por cima de outra ou dela mesma, tem que criar outra.
Polarbear (2018-07-23 18:17:56+00:00): Die CS des Jahres 2017 wurden revertiert, da sie (fast?) nur Fiktionen und Privates enthielten. 
#60993218 #60993639 #60994143 #60995246
SimonPoole (2017-08-30 17:21:00+00:00): geoportal.ch is not a legitimate source for OpenStreetMap. 

Do not use third party sources which have not been confirmed as being suitable.

I'll be asking the DWG to redact this changeset.
eknus (2017-07-28 20:03:44+00:00): Ich war heute vor Ort und habe keinen einzigen Mast gesehen. Ist die Leitung unterirdisch ?! 
Bitte überprüfen
BeKri (2017-07-30 14:50:36+00:00): Servus eknus,
Danke für Deinen Hinweis, leider ist mir nicht ganz klar, WO Du vor Ort warst.
Meinst Du die Leitung 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160368965 oder
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160368964 oder sogar beide ?
Seit april neu scheint das Parkhaus zu sein und die Leitung dort ist offentsichtlich zurückgebaut worden, wäre Fehler von mir (alte Luftaufnahmen). Gib kurz Bescheid ob ich richtig liege,
dann ändere ich das natürlich.
Gruss der BeKri
eknus (2017-07-31 17:51:26+00:00): Hallo mir ist nur die südlichere der beiden Leitungen aufgefallen  160368964 ... war da spazieren habe aber keinen Mast mehr gesehn.
Gruß eknus
BeKri (2017-07-31 23:15:15+00:00): Ok, danke,
hab die Leitung in
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50735251
"abgebaut" ;-)
SimonPoole (2017-08-30 17:21:35+00:00): geoportal.ch is not a legitimate source for OpenStreetMap. 

Do not use third party sources which have not been confirmed as being suitable.

I'll be asking the DWG to redact this changeset.
Polarbear (2018-07-23 18:17:50+00:00): Die CS des Jahres 2017 wurden revertiert, da sie (fast?) nur Fiktionen und Privates enthielten. 
#60993218 #60993639 #60994143 #60995246
SimonPoole (2017-08-30 17:23:05+00:00): maps.zh.ch is not a legitimate source for OpenStreetMap. 

Do not use third party sources which have not been confirmed as being suitable.

I'll be asking the DWG to redact this changeset.
Hjart (2017-06-04 07:57:36+00:00): Er krydset Overmarksvej/Ørnstrupvej en såkaldt mini rundkørsel? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmini_roundabout)
rasher (2017-06-04 19:49:10+00:00): Det mener jeg ikke det var, nej. Ikke stor, men ikke mini :)

Det er tænkeligt at størrelsen ikke er helt korrekt. Mit GPS spor viser ikke rigtig den lille rundkørsel ret godt. Men det er dog et skridt nærmere sandheden.
SimonPoole (2017-08-30 17:23:55+00:00): maps.zh.ch is not a legitimate source for OpenStreetMap. 

Do not use third party sources which have not been confirmed as being suitable.

I'll be asking the DWG to redact this changeset.
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:32:38+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:31:48+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
hihiro (2017-06-14 09:43:04+00:00): GPSと既存の道路等を加味して、「Japan GSI ortho imagery」のトレースで道路を追加、それに関連する道路の修正をしています。
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:31:44+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
Warin61 (2018-07-17 04:23:27+00:00): Hi
The playground Way: 497966365 tagged with landuse=sand is not correct .. landuse is the human use of the land. The sand is a landcover, and in this situation the tag to use is surface=sand. 
I have corrected this.
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:31:42+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
igeopr (2017-06-04 04:16:52+00:00): Hmm me huele a jangueo. Añade negocios que faltan por mapear. Gracias y excelente edición colega!
geo1776 (2017-06-20 02:43:10+00:00): Was this edit a mistake?  The changeset description ("d") isn't very descriptive; if you don't mind, I might do some cleanup on this changeset and a few of the subsequent changesets with the description ("d").
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:31:38+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:31:36+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
oormilavinod (2017-06-05 06:34:44+00:00): Hey loveNiu , Welcome to OSM, nice that you have started contributing to the map.  i observe that you have added parks where it should not exist according to the imageries available.  please continue adding value to the map. 
 Happy mapping
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:31:32+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
Alecs01 (2017-06-04 10:59:16+00:00): Ciao, ricordati che la barriera deve fare parte del percorso su cui si trova, altrimenti nessun software di routing può tenerne conto
Hjart (2017-06-04 07:29:40+00:00): Er du sikker på at du har tilladelse til at tegne efter det kort du linker til?
Kurt Pedersen (2017-06-05 08:42:03+00:00): jeg har bare linket til folderen om stien for info hvis man er interesseret. ikke tegnet efter den. jeg har kun tegnet det ind hvor jeg selv har været ude gå for at se forløbet
Hjart (2017-06-05 08:45:31+00:00): Ok, så er det fint :-).
Hvis du har relevante gps-spor må du iøvrigt meget gerne uploade: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Kurt%20Pedersen/traces
WoodWoseWulf (2017-06-04 12:39:37+00:00): I removed the building tag from Brisbane Water Legacy's grounds for you. Please be careful with this.
Cebderby (2017-06-12 15:05:42+00:00): Only a few of these are roundabouts, and a couple of these you left set in the wrong direction for the country.  I have fixed the worst of these.
Chris Fleming (2017-06-12 16:19:14+00:00): I don't think that the one on Big Brigs Way is actually a roundabout? What's the evidence?
Cebderby (2017-06-12 15:03:16+00:00): Do you know that the road along west side of the spanish square is one way - or any of this square?  And did you see the history of the french road, with junction=roundabout and oneway being repeatedly added and deleted?
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:31:29+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-07-05 20:28:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 50067857 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Turkey - attempts by various people to contact the user have failed.
Commodoortje (2017-06-04 11:06:14+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/Commodoortje

Klik op de link "meld u aan om mee te praten" om een reactie te geven in deze changeset.
Commodoortje (2017-06-04 11:07:18+00:00): Welkomst PB verzonden.
Commodoortje (2017-06-04 11:14:04+00:00): Beetje hulp verleent.
Hier kun je ziet wat er gewijzigd is
Je had (per ongeluk) de node 90meter van het pand afgezet.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49239734
literan (2017-06-04 12:03:22+00:00): не надо рисовать фейковые парки. Покемоны не придут.
Supaplex (2017-06-04 08:46:17+00:00): 住宅區還是商業區？
s88239 (2017-06-04 12:28:47+00:00): 文成一路、文成三路屬於住宅區
Alexander-II (2017-06-04 09:51:34+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap. Щукинский лесопарк уже размечен: смотрите alt_name в https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23265321 Вашу правку откатываю. Оно дублирует уже существующий объект.
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:30:58+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-04 08:39:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM :)

You tube "רכמל" instead of "כרמל". Also, a bridleway is used mainly for horses. Are you sure that's a bridleway? They're uncommon in Israel, I think.
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-04 08:39:43+00:00): You typed*
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-04 08:56:24+00:00): In a PM, Tamir Rarn explained that bridleways are common. I apologize for my previous comment. Happy mapping :)
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-04 09:37:34+00:00): Following a discussion, this was changed to a "path".
mueschel (2017-06-13 10:35:02+00:00): Hi,
kannst du hier nochmal über die Adressen schauen?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998566
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/497998573
Tags wie dieses sehen nach einem Fehler aus:
89a = Am Winkel

Gruß, Jan
Cebderby (2017-06-12 14:55:14+00:00): One circular way in USA set backwards, one car park outline? set as roundabout?  Needs more care.
Cebderby (2017-06-12 14:48:59+00:00): Do you know that this road loop is definitely one-way, a roundabout?  And is it really in the reverse direction to normal for the country?
Sosha1996 (2019-03-18 05:30:47+00:00): فکر میکنم رسم این https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/498003755 مورد داشته باشه و صحیح نباشه.
لطفا بررسی بفرمایید
~Jhellico (2017-06-07 05:24:09+00:00): Ви змінюєте порядок слів у назвах вулиць всупереч порядку, прийнятому спільнотою: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Назви#.D0.9F.D0.BE.D1.80.D1.8F.D0.B4.D0.BE.D0.BA_.D1.81.D0.BB.D1.96.D0.B2_.D1.83_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D1.85_.D0.B2.D1.83.D0.BB.D0.B8.D1.86.D1.8C