piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
btwhite92 (2022-10-30 16:46:00+00:00): Hello,
Please note the 'name' tag is not applicable for legal description of land - see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names, "Names are not for descriptions". If this status implies some sort of legal access to the public or some sort of protection, this should be noted using other tags.

Thanks,
Bradley
ruugie (2022-10-14 20:39:50+00:00): Don't import zoning data, please map the reality instead: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground

BTW: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14685796 is broken.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-10-13 08:15:58+00:00): Dag Router...  
Je vraagt feedback.. 
Je hebt barrier=barrier  toegevoegd
Maar wat is dit voor een barrier?..
barrier=gate ? swing_gate? log?

Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:barrier

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-13 08:21:52+00:00): aangepast barrier=bar
Router_01 (2022-10-13 10:15:20+00:00): Dit is een houten slagboom die op slot zit (en daarvoor nog een sloot).
eggie (2022-10-13 10:21:41+00:00): Oke...
Wanneer de slagboom openzwaaid dan swing_gate taggen.. Wanneer die omhoog kan dan lift_gate..
Je zou het zelf kunnen aanpassen.
.. maar welicht dekt barrier=bar ook wel als vlag de lading. 
Up to you..
Groet.
Eggie
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
adiatmad (2022-10-12 13:21:54+00:00): Your edits look great. But it will be better to avoid adding a generic name (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/10093918896). Maybe you want to check this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Ficky IRM-RV (2023-01-10 09:34:51+00:00): Hallo Abdul Rozak Romadoni,
Terima kasih karena telah berkontribusi menambahkan data di OSM!
Saat ini saya sedang melakukan remote mapping untuk validasi jaringan kereta api yang ada di Indonesia.
Saya membutuhkan bantuan anda terutama untuk rel kereta api ini (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1103079121)

Saya melihat pada history osm bahwa anda menambahkan tag "Layer=-1" pada rel kereta api ini (-6.9478552, 111.4337675). Apakah anda mengetahui bahwa rel kereta api tersebut berada pada lapisan yang berbeda dengan jalan disekitarnya (dibawah permukaan tanah)? atau adakah informasi lain yang bisa anda jelaskan?

Saya sangat mengapresiasi apapun informasi yang anda berikan.
Terima kasih
Nearby0051 (2022-10-21 13:46:02+00:00): Hi,
someone has left a note regarding one of your roads. Linking it here for reference
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3407117

Cheers
nileshdhandak (2022-10-22 06:19:11+00:00): check now.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
Firefishy (2022-10-12 05:59:09+00:00): Awesome set of first edits! I can also recommend the https://every-door.app/ app for local mapping / updating.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
archie (2022-10-18 11:48:55+00:00): Hej, du glömmer väl inte att åtgärda dessa fel här? Du fixade ju de andra så bra.
riiga (2022-10-12 20:49:39+00:00): Varför har byggnaden flyttat på sig? Den såg rättjusterad ut på flygfotot innan den flyttades.

Jag har rättat det men uppskattar gärna ett svar på varför ändringen gjordes.
stuff62 POSTNORD (2022-10-13 07:20:59+00:00): Använde fel bakgrundslager
riiga (2022-10-12 20:50:20+00:00): Samma fråga igen: Varför har byggnaden flyttat på sig? Den såg rättjusterad ut på flygfotot innan den flyttades.

Jag har rättat det men uppskattar gärna ett svar på varför ändringen gjordes.
stuff62 POSTNORD (2022-10-13 07:19:48+00:00): Använde fel bakgrundslager
bradrh (2022-11-30 01:52:31+00:00): way 484582755 does not looks unpaved, not asphalt, can you plz verify?
bradrh (2022-11-30 01:53:27+00:00): I meant to say it does look unpaved, not asphalt
rza31 (2022-11-30 15:53:24+00:00): Done ;-)
bradrh (2022-11-30 17:02:25+00:00): thx :)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
gscholz (2022-11-05 07:43:40+00:00): Hi Kanhaia,
this changeset has added some errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=80.22394&lat=26.26557&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127908399

This kind of errors irritate routing software and looks ugly on the maps.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
MinerMax555 (2022-10-12 15:56:26+00:00): I told you this before, but *please* don't have both oneway roads going into and out of a roundabout mapped as the same OSM way. It breaks routers, all mapped public transport and much more.
MinerMax555 (2022-10-12 15:57:33+00:00): Also, the road piece you re-used had a lot of other tags which are now no longer correct, such as the total amount of lanes...
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Jrachi (2022-10-12 07:34:19+00:00): Ciao.
Stavo controllando i percorsi a catasto regionale e ho visto che stai lavorando intensamente in questa zona.
Pertò mi sembra di capire che sei alle prime armi e forse avresti bisogno d'aiuto.
Avevo iniziato a correggere i problemi più grossi, ma ho visto che stai facendo modifiche e ti scrivo...
Vedo anche che usi iD che è inadatto a fare modifiche su relazioni e su zone più ampie di un paio di kilometri.
Hai per caso partecipato ad un corso CAI-OSM della SOSEC Piemonte?
Spero di no. Perchè significa che ho fatto un pessimo lavoro!.

Ivo, Jrachi
Dary Raihanah IRM-ED (2023-02-16 03:12:25+00:00): Hai, relaemanila.
Terima kasih atas kontribusi pemetaan Anda di OpenStreetMap.

Saya ingin bertanya mengenai rencana pembangunan tol Samarinda-Bontang. Bagaimana perkembangan pembangunan jalan tol tersebut di sini (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1103103217)?
Saya hanya remote mapper dan objek jalan tol tersebut belum terlihat di citra manapun.  Saya juga ingin mengetahui apa alasan Anda memberikan value layer yang berbeda-beda di setiap segmen highway=proposed? 
Saya sedang menyelesaikan issue terkait layer tapi saya tidak memiliki local knowledge sehingga saya berharap Anda dapat memberikan info terkait pembangunan jalan tol tersebut dan value di setiap tag layer=*.

Terima kasih.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2023-02-16 04:26:07+00:00): Hi Relaemanila. 
Thanks for contributing a lot to SE Asia OSM data. Especially in Indonesia. I do some validation checks on Indonesia road. I found you add and extend "Jalan Tol Samarinda - Bontang". I wanna ask about
1. I wonder how could you extend the road segment with long geometry across the city.?
2. did you mean to share what reference you used? and determine which direction is? because This road is included in the country's strategic project. the information is limited
3. there's a layer and crossing issue across the "purpose highway"  
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1103198190
4. the Local news said its delayed project https://www.indonesia-investments.com/news/todays-headlines/infrastructure-indonesia-balikpapan-bontang-toll-road-update/item7417

hope you can share any references, feel free to discuss
relaemanila (2023-02-23 16:32:35+00:00): Hi,

I do say that I did include lanes and surface and other more I did add for that large improvement (and also an extension). I haven't worked in Indonesia for a long time just because they all seem no problem at all or for other reasons. My answer for that layer issue was I did extend Jl. Tol Samarinda-Bontang using JOSM editor. You know when you draw on an existing way, it continues and causes little problem at all.
Iko IRM-RV (2023-02-24 07:20:24+00:00): Interesting discussion. may I ask where you got the toll road when you extended it?
sorry because, from your answer, I haven't gotten clear information about the source from which you extended the toll road. because the toll road hasn't started construction yet.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:54:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Supaplex030 (2022-10-12 13:24:21+00:00): Hey, sieht so aus, als wäre ein neuer Teil des Wohnparks freigegeben worden? ;) Hier gibt es übrigens eine Notiz, um den Baufortschritt zu dokumentieren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2088941

lg, Alex
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-13 12:59:19+00:00): Nieistniejących czyli jakich? Skąd wiesz, że nie istnieją? 
Dodatkowo usunąłeś linie a zostawiłeś węzły. np: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8168548031
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-13 13:00:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/877966156 miesiąc temu istniało
kamil_krk (2022-10-13 13:31:59+00:00): Witam. Jeżeli pominąłem któreś węzły to przepraszam - moja nieuwaga. Jeżeli chodzi o same linie - na mapie były one oznaczone jako "przejścia", przy czym przejściami one nie są. Zgodnie z rozporządzeniem nr 1744 z 20.10.2015 r. przejście musi spełniać spełniać wiele kryteriów, a na dodatek musi być prawnie usankcjonowane. Usunięte przeze mnie miejsca to były wyłącznie nielegalne, niebezpieczne, dzikie ścieżki. Jeżeli OSM wprowadzi coś takiego jak "dzikie przejście" to można wtedy rozważać ich istnienie, przy czym pamiętajmy - to byłaby forma zachęty dla pieszych do wykazywania się skrajnie śmiercionośnymi zachowaniami :/
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-13 17:56:35+00:00): Cóż. OSM kieruje się zasadą, że mapujemy tak jak jest w rzeczywistości więc w to wliczają się nielegalne przejścia dla których istnieje tag crossing=no (który swoją drogą zostawiłeś usuwając ścieżkę) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing%3Dno i routingi piesze powinny to uwzględniać. Można podyskutować czy dodawać tag access=no ale według mnie powinny takie przejścia zostać. Zapoczątkuję dyskusję na ten temat na discordzie OSM Polska.
maraf24 (2022-10-14 08:02:50+00:00): "Jeżeli OSM wprowadzi coś takiego jak "dzikie przejście" to można wtedy rozważać ich istnienie,"

Tak, w OSM mamy coś takiego od dawna.
Takie drogi powinny mieć na całej swojej długości access=no, i oczywiście nie powinny mieć węzła z oznaczeniem przejścia.

"[...]przy czym przejściami one nie są. Zgodnie z rozporządzeniem nr 1744 z 20.10.2015 r. przejście musi spełniać spełniać wiele kryteriów,[...]"

Przejście w OSM a przejście wg przepisów to nie musi być to samo. OSM jako projekt ogólnoświatowy najczęściej nie podąża za lokalnymi przepisami.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-10-12 08:58:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-12 09:06:25+00:00): Dag Buwka.. Waarom denk je dat hier fietssuggestiestroken zijn?
Op recente luchtfoto's is hier niets van te zien.
MVG
eggie
user_17339872 (2022-10-12 09:14:17+00:00): Hey Eggie,
Dat denk ik niet maar denk dat ik een beetje hard van stapel ben gelopen en te snel aan de gang ging. Kan ik dit zelf ook weer weizigen? 
mvg.
eggie (2022-10-12 09:24:55+00:00): Hoi Buwka Ik heb het al weer aangepast.

Voor de rest gaat het best goed.
.. dus gewoon doorgaan.
Je kun zaken het beste wijzigen met een reguliere editor als iD  of nog beter met JOSM.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

..  en vooral plezier in mappen krijgen. 

Groet
eggie
user_17339872 (2022-10-12 09:28:57+00:00): Dank je. Ik ga het allemaal even op mijn gemak uitzoeken. 

groet
Buwka
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
rarad74 (2022-10-13 16:46:26+00:00): Salut. Campul acela pentru comment la ceea ce faci nu este pus acolo doar sa pui un punct. Te rog sa pui ceva succint macar gen adaugare alee pietonala.
Multumim.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-12 08:07:56+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N21_road_(Ireland)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-10-12 09:12:06+00:00): shared_lane verwijderd. Niet aanwezig hier.
lane_markings=no
gr eggie
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-13 06:10:18+00:00): Dirbama žemė yra dirbama žemė. Žemėnauda nesikeičia, jei kažkuriais metais nebuvo išarta. Tuo labiau, kad ortofoto mes visada matome jau pavėlavusią situaciją.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:52:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
zorglubu (2022-10-12 16:02:28+00:00): Hello,

You have changed a building=yes into a landuse=greenhouse_horticulture.
This structure is clearly a greenhouse, but I think that "landuse" is not appropriate. We should rather use a "building=greenhouse" tag :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dgreenhouse
Thanks.
miroslavuzice87 (2022-10-13 06:19:13+00:00): Thank you for the valid suggestion which we accepted and applied. Happy mapping.
Miroslav
user_1566574 (2024-04-08 21:12:48+00:00): Salut !
Concernant notamment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707945496, peux-tu m'expliquer ton raisonnement stp ?
Cela ne semble pas correspondre au terrain ni à ce qui est documenté (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:footway%3Dsidewalk) ; ta modification laisse entendre que le "piéton" prend le dessus sur le "cycliste".

Merci d'avance !
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Jrachi (2022-10-13 06:53:54+00:00): Ciao, ti chiedo scusa, ma, iD non ti ha avvisato che stavi corrompendo una relazione?
Correggo io, ma fai attenzione la prossima volta.

Ivo, Jrachi
Carto'Cité (2022-12-20 11:28:58+00:00): Salut,
A priori il n'y a pas de pistes cyclables sur cette portion : 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/732901201
Elle a été ajoutée en 2019 mais je n'ai trouvé aucune trace de piste de part et d'autre de la route avec toutes les sources que j'ai testées. Si tu connais cet endroit et que tu as d'autres informations n’hésite pas à me dire que je rétablisse.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
divaddivag (2022-12-20 12:13:10+00:00): Bizarre en effet! Non il n'y a rien eu de tel à cet endroit. Il faut vraiment que je prenne le temps d'interroger ce genre de tags sur mes routes de vélo. Beaucoup de ces tags ont été mis par méconnaissance. Si c'est plus simple pour toi, envoies une liste des way que tu juges suspectes
Carto'Cité (2022-12-20 12:20:13+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour ton retour. Je viens de mettre à jour mon rendu JOSM des aménagements cyclables à cause de ce secteur où j'ai trouvé des sidewalk:both:bicycle=yes qui n'ont pas de sens. Ils sont maintenant rendus* au cas où j'en verrai passer d'autres. À l'occasion je serais très heureux d'échanger en direct avec toi car tu es un des plus importants contributeurs de Normandie 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie

*https://gitlab.com/cartocite/MapCSS-JOSM-Bicycle/-/commit/836849c9d351058a2159d246838ca9d8f19a4bfa
Larmax (2022-10-12 09:51:05+00:00): ... Matinmetsä improvements
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-12 16:11:41+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127425179
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-12 16:12:04+00:00): #vandalism

reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127425152
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
DaftKakapo (2022-10-14 13:16:46+00:00): Photo:
https://i.imgur.com/lnoqy3H.jpeg
canfe (2022-10-12 13:24:13+00:00): Non penso che il prato vicino alla cascina Margherita sia un grass. Non tagliano l'erba per portarla via tipo prato inglese. Suppongo sia un meadow o farmland se ci fanno a rotazione il mais.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127403280
RinBalzo (2022-10-12 14:16:04+00:00): Non saprei. È un prato curato, ma non ai livelli di unprato inglese. L'uso principale dovrebbe essere quello di location per matrimoni o simili.
canfe (2022-10-12 17:25:23+00:00): Allora sì, se non ci fanno "il fieno" è giusto.
Si vede che la cascina lo è solo più di nome e non di fatto.