piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
andrewwiseman (2022-09-06 23:44:56+00:00): ¡Hola YuritzyMarinGranados!
Noté que ha agregado access=permit a algunas carreteras en Zitacuaro, como en esta edición. Mi colega le envió un mensaje antes sobre eso preguntando por qué y no recibió una respuesta.

Tengo curiosidad por saber por qué estas carreteras deberían tener acceso = permiso mientras que las carreteras conectadas cercanas no lo tienen. La definición de esta etiqueta se especifica en esta página de políticas de OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access%3Dpermit). ¿Es esta etiqueta apropiada para estas carreteras?

Pregunto, porque las fuentes que citaste no proporcionan evidencia que pueda confirmar.

La forma en que están las carreteras ahora está provocando que las rutas se bloqueen en estas áreas, lo que no creo que sea correcto.

¡Gracias por sus contribuciones y espero tener noticias suyas!
aduxas (2026-04-21 15:11:18+00:00): Foster town maps do not show this as private, see https://www.townoffoster.com/sites/g/files/vyhlif4421/f/pages/plat_11.pdf
Andrea Musuruane (2022-08-28 19:29:27+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Se l'indirizzo si riferisce a una regione o a qualche località (come in questo caso) e non ad una strada, bisogna usare il tag addr:place invece di addr:street. Era quindi corretto come era stato inserito in precedenza. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125327083
mueschel (2022-09-08 10:15:59+00:00): Hi,
what does 'maxheight_explicit' mean? This tag is not used in any other place.
skalepal (2022-10-28 10:25:11+00:00): Hi,

I apologize for the delayed response. Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue. 

Apologies for adding incorrect max height tag, I have made the necessary changes in this changeset #128167789. It is an honest mistake from my end, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors going forward. 

Thanks for the support, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
skalepal
kwiatek_123 (2022-08-24 18:13:37+00:00): Szczerze nie mam pojęcia co się zmieniło bo nic się nie zmieniło
flschm (2022-08-25 18:06:23+00:00): Hallo hansemann1234, ganz herzlichen Dank fürs Ergänzen der Skulpturen! Dank der Daten hat die Wikipedia-Seite zum Amberger Skulpturenweg jetzt auch eine Karte eingebaut, die darauf basiert. Grüße, flschm
Udarian (2022-08-26 19:07:03+00:00): are you certain that these could be considered to not be construction roads because while yes the roads are complete, from what I can tell (I drove by it within the last few days) there is very much still an active construction site around it so I am not certain whether or not any of the homes within are lived in currently and legally could be gotten to due to the active construction all, around the ones that likely have been finished due to how long the construction site has been active. for more information see the following wiki for more information https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Construction.
Al Mair (2022-08-26 20:38:24+00:00): I live here and receive packages. I just received four today, from FedEx. The front is still being developed, but there are over 100 completed homes in this community.  I did not want to attempt to map the entire community, as I would like to have satellite imagery or borders to ensure I am creating the streets properly.
Udarian (2022-08-27 05:52:38+00:00): I understand, I just wasn't certain of your sources since I have only drove by and was not certain if it was the same for you or not, I dont think that it would hurt to roughly map out the streets if you could get a GPS trace by walking on the roads that are open or on the sidewalks and using that to roughly position the roads and update them when satellite imagery updates which may be some time since the last time Bing updated was, if I remember correctly in April of last year (you can check this by checking when I added the Aldi's near by). as for the GPS trace files there are many methods of obtaining them, though apps on smart phones can do the trick, I think OsmAnd works well, though there should be dedicated apps in the app store of what ever phone os you use. there are many YouTube videos on this and allot of information on the wiki. 

as a last note here, next time you make an edit like this it would be nice if in the commit you added source=local_knowledge ( so someone like me can see that and wonder if this is correct, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source for more information than I can put in this comment. also if you have spare time on you hands you can use a mobile phone editor like Go map!! (for IOS) and Vespucci or StreetComplete (android); note: I use IOS so I only have experience with Go Map!! but have heard many good things about the others.
Al Mair (2022-08-27 12:34:10+00:00): Thanks, the walking GPS mapping idea is a good one and I will be working on that this week. I greatly appreciate the guidance.
Net-net (2022-08-24 19:03:34+00:00): Can you please explain the deletion of MLC FWB?
DeFra85 (2026-01-20 15:39:08+00:00): Ahoi, was ist denn deine Quelle für den Wanderweg gewesen? Und welche Wegemarkierung hat er?
L'imaginaire (2022-08-26 07:32:10+00:00): Bedankt voor de verbetering!
ALu68 (2022-08-25 06:49:05+00:00): Hello aleno150,

that building is not the ferry terminal - see wiki "A place where people, cars etc. can board and leave a ferry" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dferry_terminal 

The terminal is here already: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2150896311

See building=transportation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dtransportation

Regards. Andre
aleno150 (2022-08-25 07:09:46+00:00): Hi Andre,

Thank you for your clarification. The building is the car check-in even if it's a bit away from the ferry. Do you change to anything more suitable?

Regards,
Alexander
ALu68 (2022-08-25 20:50:47+00:00): Hello, my proposal https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125379129
PT-53 (2022-09-25 06:14:20+00:00): Hallo <H3>,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz bei diesen beiden Linien
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/694636129/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56147942/history
u.a. die Merkmale
- highway=path
- abandoned=yes
ergänzt. Das ist technisch falsch.
Für einen aufgegebenen Weg sollte statt der beiden o.g. Merkmale das Merkmal
- abandoned:highway=path
verwendet werden.
Infos hierzu gibt es hier:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?

Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.


Gefunden mit OSM-Inspector:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=8.54256&lat=48.03495&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.34&overlays=nodes_with_empty_k%2Cways_with_empty_k%2Cnodes_with_empty_v%2Cways_with_empty_v%2Cnode_tags_with_whitespace%2Cway_tags_with_whitespace%2Cnode_with_unusual_char%2Cway_with_unusual_char%2Cnonop_confusion_on_nodes%2Cnonop_confusion_on_ways%2Cways_without_tags
KartenKerl (2022-09-25 16:05:51+00:00): das ist mir im nachhinein ein paar wochen später auch eingefallen als ich den wiki eintrag nochmal gelesen habe aber ich hatte es wieder vergessen als ich zuhause war :'D

danke
Syl (2022-09-04 13:22:22+00:00): Bonjour, il existait déjà juste à côté : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3782174631
Quel est le bon emplacement ?
seattlefyi (2022-09-06 23:42:44+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating this shop. I think the unit is still there, so did re-add the node in order to keep the (still valid) address for the next tenant. In iD you can right-click and "downgrade" a node which removes all the business-related tags at once. (You can also remove tags one at a time from an object in the leftmost panel). Thanks again!
seattlefyi (2022-09-06 23:44:54+00:00): (To clarify, I re-added the entire node to get the address back, but then removed just the tags related to the closed business (name, type), then uploaded.)
ftcat (2022-08-25 07:31:18+00:00): Hi,

What are these? Please don't create mass imports of data like this, it is meaningless and degrades the quality of the data in OpenStreetMap. A number of mappers are doing mass imports of data from ZamStats that has no relevance to OpenStreetMap
sazrodrigo (2022-08-24 20:01:29+00:00): Aqui um exemplo de como é possível mapear um presídio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586362885#map=19/-23.37952/-51.11309
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125330923
skquinn (2022-08-27 02:28:41+00:00): my 30,000th changeset
ovruni (2022-08-24 23:39:36+00:00): Hola, en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios se han agregado varios objetos ficticios, por lo que han sido retirados.
Saludos
ivanbranco (2024-05-10 14:58:09+00:00): Ciao Enry, questo albero esiste? Mi viene il dubbio dall'altezza ragguardevole e il commento "prova"
Enry S (2024-06-17 19:15:17+00:00): Ciao Ivan,
Grazie della segnalazione! Ho rimosso l'albero; sicuramente, a suo tempo, l'avevamo aggiunto per errore durante il campo E/G con i ragazzi
user_14547832 (2022-08-26 15:09:10+00:00): It looks like NotRedArroyo tried to draw East Denton and East Cooke Counties' Outdated Imagery, but failed
user_14547832 (2022-08-24 23:35:51+00:00): Why did you delete Bridgewater?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-08-30 05:45:56+00:00): Have you remapped Bridgewater instead of reverting their edits?

I reverted their edit and now I see that many (all?) ways are duplicated.

Maybe I should revert https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125549753 ?
eggie (2022-08-24 22:01:14+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Alle adresnodes zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster, Een fout in de postcode komt zelden voor. Weet je het zeker?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-08-24 22:07:57+00:00): De postcode heb ik weer terug gezet conform BAG en website
MVG
eggie
Paukenist&Zn (2022-08-24 22:10:48+00:00): Het klopt moest zijn 9412 AG
eggie (2022-08-24 22:15:47+00:00): Ik heb het opnieuw aangepast..
No problem..
Groet
eggie
user_5359 (2022-08-26 06:38:21+00:00): Hallo! Bitte schau Dir nochmal  http://www.osm.org/way/1088929278. Was ist die Bedeutung vom Schlüssel de:wasserkoerperkuerzel? Warum stellst Du die Sprache vorne an? Wenn Du Deutschland meinst muss das es DE lauten. In dem Fall wäre es auch ein Referenz auf irgend eine Auflistung und dann fehlt der entsprechende Hinweis (ref) darauf.
Frans S (2022-08-27 08:04:07+00:00): Hello Angelica
An urgent request.
Please improve your mapping skills !! and map buildings accurate. And, do not upload each singel building , but after you mapped a number or when you want to stop.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125333269
emersonveenstra (2022-08-25 11:47:02+00:00): Hi,

construction=yes is not a valid tag and isn't recognized by all routers. You need to do highway=construction+construction=cycleway, but only if it will be closed for a while (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction for more information)
emersonveenstra (2022-09-09 11:25:56+00:00): fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125977797
Syl (2022-10-14 11:04:36+00:00): Bonjour, dans ce groupe de modification vous avez dupliqué un grand nombre d'éléments qui existaient déjà. Pouvez-vous corriger ?
woodpeck (2022-08-24 22:01:35+00:00): Hello GermanDeaf, please provide accurate changeset descriptions. The changeset comment field should be used to describe what you have done (and why). The date when the changeset was uploaded is already recorded automatically, hence "Map Miércoles, 24 de agosto de 2022" is not useful.
pitscheplatsch (2022-08-25 19:13:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Stylez995 (2022-12-03 23:21:11+00:00): Heisann Forteller. Thorvalds gate er ikke enveiskjørt, så det er best at du unngår "oneway=yes", siden den brukes bare når gaten er skiltet enveiskjørt, ikke kun forbudt for motorvogn (unntatt busser) i en retning. I dette tilfellet bruker man heller "motor_vehicle:[forward/backward]=no" og "bus:[forward/backward]"=yes. See redigeringskogmmentar fra NKA når jeg gjorde det samme før: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91595029
Stylez995 (2023-04-03 10:27:56+00:00): Har nå fjernet "oneway"-taggene, og brukte "motor_vehicle:[forward/backward]=no" og "bus:[forward/backward]"=yes som er lagt inn fra før. Se https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/oneway-yes-tagg-pa-ikke-enveiskjort-gate-men-bare-for-busser-i-en-retning/9414/2
pitscheplatsch (2022-08-25 19:12:43+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Furthermore, may we know the source of your mapping activities? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Jillis inactivE (2022-09-05 11:46:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3345894, volgens mij door een stukje oneway in de N838 bij de Zahnstraat.
Allroads (2022-09-05 12:35:40+00:00): Klopt, fout van mij, oneway verwijderd.
Over het hoofd gezien, En dan probeer je het nog zo goed te doen. Helaas. Bedankt, weer wat geleerd. Routering is lastig te controleren. Pas na een tijd als de routerings sites deze data heeft opgepakt.
Daithí (2022-08-24 22:24:31+00:00): Confirmation of the change was announced on the company's official Facebook page see: https://www.facebook.com/TheWarehouseGymGalway/posts/pfbid0W6xLo32yviGqRYVAPrZZAywxEY9KxpbC8ZyHAqHsP7UnDaUagxvLP5kaE89zurs1l
eggie (2022-08-25 04:42:45+00:00): Beste... maar waarom er dan toch weer AP van maken als dat verkeerd is?
Mvg
Eggie
eggie (2022-08-25 07:26:00+00:00): Geen idee waarom je steeds mijn correctie weer verandert in van AG naar  .....AP?
Wanneer je van mening bent dat de postcode hier verkeerd in de data van het Kadaster staat kun je een terugmelding doen naar het Kadaster. Even op het potloodje klikken.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=noordveen%2021%20beilen&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=1731010000003175&objectId=1731200000003157&geometry.x=231732.57&geometry.y=543416.38200042&zoomlevel=7

MVG
eggie
Paukenist&Zn (2022-08-25 07:34:56+00:00): Beste Eggie, ik doe helemaal niets! Zou het kunnen zijn dat maps.me dit op de achtergrond doet?
eggie (2022-08-25 07:50:02+00:00): Nou.. Ik geloof je gelijk....Wonderlijke editor.

Wij zijn ook niet zo blij met maps.me
Het geeft vaak vervuiling van de data en gebruikers weten niet eens dat ze iets aanpassen in OSM.
Het varieert van Hier woon ik tot hier staat m'n auto. 

Misschien onthoudt ie je laatste actie en voert die weer door,
Dat gebeurde hier. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125335025

Ik heb het weer aangepast. Zou er dan niet mee zitten :)

Je zou eens als je iets met je mobiel wilt doen naar  	Organic Maps android 2022.07.27-3-FDroid
kunnen kijken. Dat is een iets betere tool en je wordt ook niet hinderlijk gevolgd in je acties door maps.me.

Of een reguliere editor als iD en/of JOSM gebruiken.

Hakuna Matata
eggie
Noen (2022-08-26 11:01:52+00:00): Hei, og velkommen til Openstreetmap!
«foot=no» taggen brukes _kun_ der det er forbudt å gå. Det er ikke en vurdering av hvor egnet veien er å gå på.
Her er det skiltet forbudt for gående  og syklende kun over brua, og kun fra nordre side.
Du kan tagge mangel på fortau med 
«sidewalk=no» og at fortauet er kartlagt separat og heller bør benyttes med «sidewalk=separate».
Bjune (2022-09-02 09:16:55+00:00): Hei Noen. Tenker du da at 'Lja bru' blir tagget med 'sidewalk=separate' og helt inn i krysset?

Og at den mindre delen av 'Ekebergveien' blir tagget med 'sidewalk=no'. Eller er dette også en 'sidewalk=separate'?
Noen (2022-09-05 14:29:46+00:00): Begge strekningene du endret på mangler fortau, og bør tagges sidewalk=no.
I mellom er Ljabruveien (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141273324) nå tagget sidewalk:right=separate og sidewalk:left=no (man kan skille mellom høyre og venstre side)
Jmapper007 (2022-08-25 01:36:25+00:00): Wait, I'm confused. Why exactly did you delete the road names and replace them with US-6 and CT-66?
jnighan (2022-08-25 01:43:06+00:00): Because the 'names' previously listed for those roads:
- Are historical and do not appear on any street signs on the ground
- Are not the names used in adresses on those streets (e.g., it is 249 Route 6, Andover, CT and NOT 249 Jonathan Trumbull Highway, Andover, CT)
jnighan (2022-08-25 01:43:22+00:00): * addresses
Jmapper007 (2022-08-25 02:01:49+00:00): Well, despite this I do not see the reason why they should be deleted as they are the official road names as seen on the Connecticut DOT website. I also know for a fact that the school at the junction of 6 and 66 has the address of 14 Middletown Road, not 14 Route 66, if this is not the case on the address nodes then they are incorrect.
jnighan (2022-08-25 03:39:26+00:00): You're right about the school... That is odd. 

According to CRCOG GIS data, which is the GIS portal for the Town of Columbia, the address actually IS 14 Route 66. Obviously, municipalities are the authorities of road names in their jurisdictions.

See here: https://www.propertyrecordcards.com/PropertyResults.aspx?towncode=030&uniqueid=00061000

"Location:	14 RT 66"

So why does this school (and a few other businesses nearby) list Middletown Road as their address?

I checked every single intersection, and there is not one Middletown Road sign. I assumed these historical route names 

Also, I did not "delete" the former road names, I just moved their values to "unsigned=" and added "noname=yes." If you're going to just undo other people's edits immediately, at least do it right. These roads now have "name=", "noname=yes", and "unsigned="
andrewsuzuki (2022-08-29 18:18:06+00:00): Alright so there definitely needs to be some cleanup here :) First @jnighan I'm not sure you're supposed to put actual names in the unsigned tag? The wiki page lists "unsigned=name" but I think it means literally the value "name", not [name]. And if you look at taginfo now, it's dominated by the names of Connecticut highways.
Then second, @Jmapper007 clearly name isn't compatible with noname=yes so there has to be some resolution there
Jmapper007 (2022-08-29 18:29:51+00:00): I was originally just going to revert this edit but I didn't since there was more than just the highways, so I decided the best option would be to manually do it. However, I did not see all the other tags on the roads since I was busy trying to put their names back to normal.
rskedgell (2025-03-10 09:54:41+00:00): Hi, just a quick reminder that sidewalk=separate applies only when there the separate sidewalk is drawn as a footway in OSM. If there is a sidewalk separated by a verge, but not drawn separately, the tagging you probably want is sidewalk=both + verge=both
0235 (2025-03-10 11:02:27+00:00): This was a street complete changeset, so I wouldn't have been able to draw the separated sidewalk.

However, I have been slowly going through the town and making sure I update my older tags. For a long time I was tagging as "sidewalk=no" for roads without a directly connected sidewalk, but have been changing this to separate + drawing the sidewalk or footway. Similar to sidewalk=yes, I am trying to change to sidewalk:both=yes

Thank your for your vigilance on the matter! :)
OpenStreetBoy (2025-12-08 16:53:22+00:00): So wie der Shelter jetzt eingezeichnet ist, steht er genau über dem Bornemacher-Gedenkstein. Die vorherige Position war schon korrekt.
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-12-08 18:02:53+00:00): Da musst Du bison166 schreiben. Der hat den shelter heute in diesem CS verschoben:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175666307

Viele Grüße
OSM_RogerWilco (2025-12-08 18:05:16+00:00): Ich war mal so frei:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/175680045
OpenStreetBoy (2025-12-10 12:30:35+00:00): Danke!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Muhmaker (2022-08-25 10:09:29+00:00): Beim Erstellen dieser riesigen place-Objekte bist du beim Zeichnen leider zu nah an highways geraten. Durch ein tolles "Feature" des Editors ist die neue Linie dann an einigen Punkten auf dem highway eingerastet und wurde damit verklebt. Das ist für das spätere Editieren der highways mega-nervig. Speziell hier am Altstadt-Hufeisen mit den vielen Busrouten ein Alptraum. Bitte achte darauf, flächige Objekte nicht zu nah an highways zu zeichnen. Ich werde das hier reparieren. Bitte keine weiteren Edits an diesen place-Objekten.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125335903
DeFra85 (2022-08-25 11:01:52+00:00): Danke dir, aber wenn du magst kann ich das auch alles wieder mehr an den Straßenrand schieben, brauchst deine Zeit nicht dafür opfern.

Ich bin gerade noch auf der Suche nach online-Quellen im Historischen Museum und Stadtarchiv, als Beleg. Die kann ich ja noch nachträglich anheften?
Muhmaker (2022-08-25 12:35:16+00:00): Ich mache mir hauptsächlich Sorgen um die Stellen der highways die aufgelöst und wieder verbunden werden müssen. Dabei dürften mit dem iD Editor die Routen kaputt gehen. Warte bitte noch etwas. Die Quellen kannst du dann natürlich später ergänzen
DeFra85 (2022-08-25 12:43:36+00:00): Ach ja, die Relationen!!!

Hatte extra darauf geachtet nix zu verkleben und ggf. wieder getrennt.

Danke Dir.
Muhmaker (2022-08-25 14:00:12+00:00): Sie sind jetzt entklebt und verschoben. Falls du vor hast, noch mehr (historische) Viertel in Bielefeld zu markieren, sollte das vielleicht vorher diskutiert werden. Ich sehe nämlich nur einen sehr geringen Informationswert darin. Und so komplett virtuelle Flächen-Objekte habe ja wie gesehen ein großes Störungspotential.
abakus_uploader (2022-08-25 22:30:58+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!