piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-24 06:51:14+00:00): Jakiego rodzaju ślady po https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051887570/history są widoczne w terenie?
rainerU (2022-04-25 06:53:58+00:00): Bonjour,

Tu as ajouté des sentiers et tu les as qualifiés de highway=footway. "footway" est prévu pour les chemins piétonniers en ville, pour les sentiers il vaut mieux utiliser highway=path

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dfootway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dpath

Autre remarque : Tu as positionné quelques points de ces sentiers sur des objets existants qui ne sont pas des sentiers ou autres chemins, par exemple ici avec le contour d'une forêt (landuse=forest). Ceci pose des problèmes car une modification d'un des deux éléments ainsi liés peut entraîner  une modification involontaire de l'autre. Il faut donc prendre garde de ne lier que les objets réellement liés sur le terrains, par ex deux chemins qui se croisent.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119723283
ovruni (2022-04-15 00:04:11+00:00): Hola Gerardo, la linea que mencionas también es parte de otra frontera de distritos, voy a revertir este conjunto de cambios también. 
Saludos
GerardoMalasquez (2022-04-15 00:14:10+00:00): Esta bien, muchas gracias por la aclaración.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
martien-176 (2022-04-15 16:05:04+00:00): And deleted incorrectly traced roads crossing buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119724445
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
AndersAndersson (2022-04-15 19:11:29+00:00): Kan gående och cyklister alltid använda bommen? Lägger du i så fall till foot=yes t.ex. så att ruttning fungerar.
zvenzzon (2022-04-15 19:59:04+00:00): Jadu, det har jag inte tänkt på. Men (skogs)cyklister och gående kan alltid komma förbi på sidan, så foot=yes och bicycle=yes verkar vettigt att lägga till.  Jag fixar det.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-04-14 18:59:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119725347 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for vandalism and creating fake objects
marczoutendijk (2022-04-14 19:01:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5906
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
4004 (2022-04-18 02:12:23+00:00): сокращения и тип не пишем в название - то, что это гаражный кооператив, уже исходит из других тегов
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
MxxCon (2022-04-15 04:48:45+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate on your edit? This house doesn't look like a castle...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119725411
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-15 23:12:06+00:00): It is a mistake. I've had times when the type of building will change. I think its on my end. Fixed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:13:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-08-29 05:44:54+00:00): Reverted by DWG as apparent undiscussed import by OEG, possibly using unauthorised data sources

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/140522524
user4816003805 (2022-04-27 20:39:59+00:00): Hi,

Is the Panera Bread currently vacant?
If so, it's sometimes better to use a "disused:shop" tag (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:shop) rather than deleting the node outright, as it allows people using StreetComplete to check if the shop is still vacant later on.
Pharaoh (2022-04-27 21:08:16+00:00): It is indeed a vacant spot but it's an open commercial space vs a shop necessarily. It also doesn't have any panera branding. I added a new unnamed disused:shop=yes node but the talk pages around it has quite a bit of disagreement.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
ovruni (2022-04-14 19:34:02+00:00): Hola JohnLpz, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en varios de tus conjuntos de cambios no se han agregado comentarios que permitan que otros miembros puedan entender los cambios realizados, solamente se indica "#osmpe-unmsm-comaru". Por favor revise la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
janosrusiczki (2022-04-15 08:25:36+00:00): rapid ai marcat :) bună treabă.
Leo Slager (2022-04-15 10:05:45+00:00): Dag KC1973,
ref=190 hoort niet te worden getagd op de stop_position.
ik pas het even aan.
MxxCon (2022-04-15 04:58:31+00:00): Hello.
Memorial street names must be tagged with alt_name or other appropriate tags as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name

Additionally, historic=run_dmc_jmj_way is not a valid tag.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119726161
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-15 22:58:38+00:00): Hi, Thanks for the opinion. Run DMC JMJ Way is a real stretch of street. I will re tag with your instructions. Thanks
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-15 22:59:12+00:00): https://gothamist.com/news/run-dmc-jmj-way-unveiled
grawal (2024-03-31 08:54:53+00:00): Ciao, la relazione secondo me è da eliminare in quanto di interesse limitato alla scuola di un comune; inoltre l'indicazione: Ritrovo ore 8:00 - Partenza ore 8:05, è assolutamente fuori contesto OSM.
mavl (2022-04-15 15:10:30+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет здания прямо поверх существующих зданий. Так делать не нужно. Одного здания на карте вполне достаточно.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
ReScQ (2022-04-15 15:13:41+00:00): In Deutschland sind die administrative boundaries flächendeckend gut gemappt, daher ist der is_in key nur in wenigen Fällen notwendig und sollte daher nicht mehr verwendet werden vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:is_in
mavl (2022-04-15 15:13:13+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет здание прямо поверх существующего здания. Это ошибка.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
vmicho (2022-06-25 17:41:36+00:00): Hello.
I've reverted your change as it changed compared to aerial view.
If I missed something by accident please tell me or repair it ;)
Nicolas Martignoni (2022-06-25 17:48:18+00:00): Hi
I'm afraid the actual situation was modified, and the aerial views are older.
Nicolas Martignoni (2022-06-25 17:49:14+00:00): However, the turn restriction is really here.
vmicho (2022-06-25 18:20:22+00:00): I've additionally added that turn as I saw is was part of your change  ;)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
V-Li (2022-04-15 23:35:02+00:00): Meinst du mit unterirdisch, dass die Straße überdacht ist?  Soweit ich sehen kann, ist das Parkdeck richtig erfasst.
V-Li (2022-04-16 22:28:56+00:00): Es gibt noch ein paar Probleme mit den sich schneidenden Wegen auf verschiedenen Ebenen, siehe auch https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?zoom=14&lat=48.20808&lon=16.37221
greengea069 (2022-04-19 18:43:27+00:00): Genau. Es sind sichtbar schneidende Wege, jedoch auf verschiedenen Ebenen. Nördliche Zufahrt unter Deck (Einschnitt/Erdgeschoss). Südliche Zufahrt auf Parkdeck (Dach). Es ist quasi nicht möglich "durchzufahren", da zwei Ebenen durch Einschnitt in die Landschaft.
V-Li (2022-04-20 04:51:57+00:00): Schau dir mal
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:layer an, damit kannst du die verschiedenen Ebenen beschreiben.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
DUGA (2023-01-08 03:33:34+00:00): Please be aware that importing junks into OSM will get yourself blocked (I don't believe that you draw everything here on your own).

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051909278/history#map=15/41.6398/-75.4834
legofahrrad (2022-04-15 16:10:51+00:00): Hallo und vielen Dank für deine Bearbeitung bei OpenStreetMap!

Bitte beachte, dass Gebäude, die noch auf Luftbildern zu erkennen sind, nicht gelöscht werden sollten.
Der nächste könnte dann nämlich das Gebäude wieder vom Luftbild abzeichnen, da er denkt, dass es noch fehlen würde.
Für z. B. abgerissene Gebäude gibt es bei OSM die "Lifecycle Prefixes" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix) → bedeutet also für ein abgerissenes Gebäude "demolished:building=yes"

Viele Grüße!
MxxCon (2022-04-15 05:06:57+00:00): Hello.
"UPLAND UPDATES" is a meaningless changeset comment. Please write more descriptive messages so that others can understand what exactly you are mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119727002
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-15 23:32:41+00:00): It's not meaningless. I will begin using a more detailed description just for you.
MxxCon (2022-04-15 23:35:36+00:00): This is not just for me, but for every other mapper in NYC and globally that look over the map to make sure that the data is accurate and correct. 🙂 And also for yourself, if at some point in the future you'll be looking over your own changesets, it'll be easier to find the one you need and to understand and remember what exactly you were doing in it.
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-15 23:39:59+00:00): Thanks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
pitfire (2022-04-15 05:29:48+00:00): Hallo hsc666,
Kleinigkeit :-)
Parkplatz "Weg: 175868005" kann gelöscht werden. Die Verbindung gibt es nicht. Da steht die Schranke "Knoten #1864251388"
hsc666 (2022-04-15 07:37:32+00:00): Stimmt. Merci! ;-)
user_507893 (2022-04-14 20:02:25+00:00): "Knoten gelöscht nach Ortskenntnis" sollte das werden
Frans S (2022-04-24 08:36:21+00:00): Hello. I commented on your mappings on a PM
The room in this box is not big enough to give you my comments
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119727531
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Sanniu (2022-04-17 09:37:42+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

This is a building and not the farm! Please read OSM wiki about different types of objects before doing such changes!
Tzlilrub (2022-04-17 14:29:27+00:00): Hello, I added the farm under "historical site", and it is a historical farm.
Sanniu (2022-04-18 04:06:50+00:00): But you also dropped building=yes while changing, I now combined both values back.
Edelsalami (2022-06-20 20:38:55+00:00): Hi Nemoses, ich habe die Gleise der Leppetalbahn wieder entfernt, da historische Objekte nicht in OSM gemappt werden. Alternativ zu den Gleios-Objekten könnte man aber eine Relation anlegen, die existierende Wege benutzt. Gruß
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
mk2k22 (2022-08-06 16:36:36+00:00): Hi, are you sure horse=yes is the right choice here? I highly doubt it, on a suspension bridge like this.
martianfreeloader (2022-08-07 08:24:50+00:00): Hi,
There is no horse=yes tag on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/953824979/history

Did you mean some other bridge?
mk2k22 (2022-08-07 10:00:48+00:00): Hi, my bad... I got misled by the iD Editor where it seemed as though it was set to "yes" but it was in fact greyed out (not actually selected).
martianfreeloader (2022-08-07 18:22:21+00:00): Ah, no worries!

Try josm! A bit of learning, but after 2 days practice you will not want to switch back anymore.
MxxCon (2022-04-15 05:11:27+00:00): Hello.
Considering you are mapping in US, and most editors here speak English, please write your changeset comments in English. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119728336
Antikmaster (2022-04-15 22:04:05+00:00): @MxxCon, 
no problem , future changes will be in english ;) thanks for the info
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Mordechai23 (2022-04-15 16:53:43+00:00): Thats's great, thanks ;)
user_5359 (2022-04-15 13:16:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051929197. What is the meaning of the tag building ger = yes?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-16 07:01:25+00:00): What are you using as a source for the deletion of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5476491986/history
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-16 16:47:54+00:00): Google maps and Apple Maps only one The Venue exists on that block
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-17 13:12:02+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright#Proprietary_data
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:14:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
marc__marc (2023-04-26 00:00:53+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051932613
roof:slope:direction -> roof:direction
Regards,
Marc
zstadler (2022-05-26 06:43:12+00:00): שלום אמיר,

ברוך הבא ל
OSM
ותודה על תרומתך למפה

בעריכה זו הוספת את השביל השחור הזה
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051933057

האם הוא מסומן בסימון שבילים שחור או שהצבע השחור מגיע ממקור אחר?

סמוך לקטע שהוספת קיים במפה שביל שחור עם תוואי אחר. ראה
https://israelhiking.osm.org.il/share/Uh6kuVNUnf
zstadler (2022-09-25 14:31:48+00:00): שלום אמיר,

אני מצטער שלא ענית לפנייתי הקודמת.

ללא תגובה ממך, נאלצתי למחוק את הצבע השחור מהשביל שהוספת.

Fixed
EMREOYUN (2022-04-14 21:08:54+00:00): Daha fazla bilgi için: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quality_assurance#subway-preprocessor
sanch3z (2022-04-18 18:03:09+00:00): Hallo,
mir ist aufgefallen, dass die Gehwege, die du einträgst, bereits auf den zugehörigen Straßen mittels sidewalk=* (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sidewalk) erfasst sind. Wenn du die Gehsteige separat erfassen willst, dann passe bitte den sidewalk-tag auf den Straßen an. Bitte achte außerdem darauf, dass die Gehwege mit den Straßen-Knoten verbunden sind, um ein sinnvolles Routing zu ermöglichen.
VictorIE (2022-04-28 00:04:09+00:00): Hi,

Are you sure this is a pipeline? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/972491150/
user_13521446 (2022-04-28 13:34:01+00:00): Fixed  : )
VictorIE (2022-04-28 13:57:03+00:00): :)
gscholz (2022-04-26 04:55:04+00:00): Hi Fidelis Assis,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red dots):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-39.87396&lat=-17.56195&zoom=11&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

As you may know, not connected way cannot be used by routing software.
Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
Fidelis Assis (2022-04-26 12:20:12+00:00): Hi Guido,
thanks for pointing it out. I thought I had fixed them all but some went unnoticed. Fixed now.
Best regards,
-- Fidelis
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-10 12:15:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123429454 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some POI additions, some of which at least are based on Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6130 and https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15458291 .
MxxCon (2022-04-15 05:18:52+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate why did you delete this tree node when it's clearly visible in satellite imagery?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119730256
theMETAVERSr (2022-04-15 23:36:19+00:00): There are trees everywhere and it clutters the map. The view of the business name is more important on a map than trees. UNLESS they are tress of historical significance like Joshua Trees or National Mall Cherry Blossoms.
MxxCon (2022-04-15 23:41:28+00:00): That fact it "clutters the map" should be irrelevant to you. OSM is used by thousands of different data consumers. Some maps are designed specifically to display streets and to judge how green areas are. Other maps filter out trees. Others give priority to labels over map features. And there are thousands of other situations and combinations.
It is wrong to delete data from the map simply because you do not like how it looks in one specific map style. It's called "tagging for renderer" and it is wrong. You can read more about it here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Don't worry if the map looks messy or cluttered. The most important thing is for the data to be as accurate as possible. Let systems that generate maps worry about making it readable.