piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:26:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
EP_Repair (2022-02-26 01:24:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117858450, 117866896 where the changeset comment is: reverting highway classification edits where Fluffy downgraded trunk/motorway roads without either discussing with local communities or following 2021 Highways Classification wiki. Fluffy is now blocked from classifying highways.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:25:53+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9462573988/history
Danil (2022-02-02 05:01:48+00:00): boundary marker coordinate from official document, available online at https://peraturan.go.id/peraturan/view.html?id=11e8bfb07b1f804483d8313131353333

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 73 Tahun 2018 tentang Batas Daerah Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Provinsi Sumatera Barat dengan Kabupaten Kerinci Provinsi Jambi dan Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Provinsi Sumatera Barat dengan Kota Sungai Penuh Provinsi Jambi
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:18:05+00:00): corrected:#mbx_linters_canada
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:19:48+00:00): corrected:#mbx_linters_canada
MxxCon (2022-02-01 07:17:16+00:00): Seriously, NYMM, how long are you going to keep making OSM edits with invalid tags?
Please consult https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone#Spacing_and_separators and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
If your business is around SEO optimizations in various places, why the hell would keep adding invalid data? Do you intentionally want your clients to have bad search results?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116813725
MxxCon (2022-02-01 07:18:31+00:00): Also read what this tag means  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator:type
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116813725
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:13:17+00:00): correct:#mbx_linters_canada
gscscnd (2022-01-31 11:51:42+00:00): Nowszy tag crossing=marked jest mniej precyzyjny niż crossing=uncontrolled. Z założenia miał oznaczać to samo, ale w praktyce jako crossing=marked są oznaczane zarówno przejścia z sygnalizacją świetlną, jak i te bez niej. Lepiej stosować stare i jednoznaczne tagi crossing=uncontrolled i crossing=traffic_signals. Zobacz też <https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=821285#p821285>.
Piotr Cała (2022-01-31 12:17:19+00:00): Dzięki. Poprawione ;)
Danil (2022-02-02 05:02:02+00:00): boundary marker coordinate from official document, available online at https://peraturan.go.id/peraturan/view.html?id=11e8bfb07b1f804483d8313131353333

Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Republik Indonesia Nomor 73 Tahun 2018 tentang Batas Daerah Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Provinsi Sumatera Barat dengan Kabupaten Kerinci Provinsi Jambi dan Kabupaten Pesisir Selatan Provinsi Sumatera Barat dengan Kota Sungai Penuh Provinsi Jambi
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:48:41+00:00): correct:#mbx_linters_canada
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:49:55+00:00): correct:#mbx_linters_canada
woodpeck_repair (2022-02-15 10:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117429732 where the changeset comment is: reverting Kmaper edits since most are vandalism; this might overwrite some subsequent edits
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:51:19+00:00): correct:#mbx_linters_canada
Stefanau (2022-02-21 08:35:21+00:00): Hast Du Dich vor Ort vergewissert, dass der Weg auch benutzt werden darf?
Tomas Straupis (2022-01-31 12:47:53+00:00): Srutos ir atliekos nėra natūralaus vandens telkinys, todėl nuėmiau natural=water žymą.
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:24:52+00:00): corrected:#mbx_linters_canada
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:28:15+00:00): corrected:#mbx_linters_canada
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:30:40+00:00): #mbx_linters_usa
Vinber-Pro (2022-01-31 15:24:10+00:00): Tu as fait un autre "way" sur la route ? Si c'est une bande cycle alors plutôt ajouter Est-ce une voie séparée de la route ou une bande sur la route ?
Vinber-Pro (2022-01-31 16:24:01+00:00): pardon, message incompréhensible !
je reprends : "est-ce une voie séparée de la route ou une bande sur la route ?"
COCMOP (2022-01-31 16:26:40+00:00): C'est une piste séparée de la route, présente sur le trottoir gauche de la rue d'Ennigerloh (du Sud vers le Nord).
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:27:01+00:00): corrected:#mbx_linters_canada
KVI0n (2022-01-31 14:43:22+00:00): #mbx_linters_usa
ToniE (2022-01-31 10:21:16+00:00): Bus 58, nicht 68
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:27:32+00:00): corrected:#mbx_linters_canada
KVI0n (2022-01-31 14:42:45+00:00): #mbx_linters_usa
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-09 18:08:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127261883 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: privacy issues and wrong use of tags
Vinber (2022-02-03 13:26:54+00:00): Bonjour,
un petit mot d'accueil qui peut servir ici
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Dans cette première contribution, vous avez ajouté un nom qui n'a pas beaucoup de sens pour un nom dans OSM (petit nom d'OpenStreetMap).
Quelques infos ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

Si vous souhaitez le modifier ok, si vous ne le souhaitez pas pouvez vous me le signaler que je m'en occupe svp ?

N'hésitez pas à écrire une note (suggérer une amélioration de la carte, dans le menu vertical à droite, avant dernier icône).

Bonne journée
fabiotofy (2022-02-01 08:03:58+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta. Che quello sia un campo da basket lo si capisce già dall'etichetta "sport""basketball" . Non serve ripeterlo anche nel campo "name" lasciato piuttosto per poter indicare il nome, qualora presente, del campo "esempio, Palazzetto Michael Jordan"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116817287
Marialuisa86 (2022-02-01 08:09:08+00:00): Ciao Fabio, grazie della segnalazione! Pensavo che compilando name, si sarebbe abilitata una label all'over sul pin. Grazie della precisazione.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116817287
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-01-31 10:55:19+00:00): الرسم لشعيب أجر والتعليق كان للتغيير السابق
mavl (2022-02-01 15:14:50+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет улицы прямо поверх уже существующих улиц. Это ошибка. Если в реальности одна улица, то и на карте должна быть одна улица.  
  
Также комментарий к пакету правок "на карте нет улицы" ошибочен. Эти улицы уже есть на карте.  
  
Этот пакет правок отменён.
lololailo (2022-02-11 16:04:26+00:00): Hola, en esta edición has dejado un paso de peatones en un edificio.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116817796
lololailo (2022-02-11 15:59:16+00:00): Hola, es conveniente que en los name utilices las mayúsculas "Polígono Industrial Cabezo de Torres".
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116818271
user_5359 (2022-02-02 10:57:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/119516957/history. What is the meaning of the tag 9 de Julio = 9 de Octubre?
pertile (2022-02-02 13:28:34+00:00): Sorry, wrong tag, I just corrected it. Thanks for noticing it.
SvM (2022-01-31 16:24:00+00:00): Не нужно такие небольшие дороги отмечать как улицы (highway=residential). И тем более не следует им давать имена типа "подъезд к водонапорной башне"
streckenkundler (2022-01-31 17:22:18+00:00): Hei,

nebenbei... du weißt, daß du die LGB-Daten nutzen darfst, also auch die Verwaltungsgrenzen... Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal

Das ist für solche Admin-Grenzkorrekturen eine extrem hilfreiche Sache... Da du ja mit JOSM arbeitest, ist das Einbinden kein Problem.

Danke und Gruß,

Sven
kirsch53 (2022-01-31 19:30:37+00:00): Hi Sven,
vielen Dank für diesen super Hinweis.
Das erleichtert die Arbeit beträchtlich.

Gruß
Fred
streckenkundler (2022-01-31 19:49:17+00:00): Hei,
ja es ist mittlerweile eine echte Wohltat. Im Wiki sind nur die wichtigsten Dienste genannt. Auch Verwaltungsgrenzen. Ich bin ja hellhörig geworden, da du im CS-Kommentar "Ortsgrenzen" geschrieben hattest... 

Letztendlich sind alle Dienste, die direkt übers LGB angeboten werden, offen!!! :)

Wenn du Grenzen editierst und verbesserst, kannst du das vorhandene source-Tag am Objekt nebenbei entfernen. Das dann obsolet. Mit der entsprechenden source-Angabe im CS sind die Bedingungen hinreichend erfüllt.  

Grüße,  Sven
wislander (2022-05-26 05:27:50+00:00): Hi 0wu,

I was biking down Sand Point Way today, and the sidewalks you added along that street mostly don't seem to exist. Rather, I just saw a regular shoulder on each side, which can be used for car parking and isn't dedicated to pedestrians.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116819994
E de Wit (2022-01-31 13:01:29+00:00): Hoi,

Ik zie meerdere wegclassificaties die duidelijk niet overeenkomen met de werkelijkheid. Gezien de schade die is ontstaan lijkt een revert mij op zijn plaats.

Daarnaast wordt de 'fout' van deze challenge niet opgelost door wegclassificaties te veranderen en suggereert deze challenge ook niet het gebruik van de onjuiste classificatie.
Slechts dat er mogelijk een weg ontbreekt op locatie v/d node.

- E de Wit
Lee Carré (2022-02-01 20:21:03+00:00): Source?
Johnny Carlsen (2022-02-02 11:29:03+00:00): The sources I've used are Mapillary, Bing and some local knowledge.

But thanks for questioning this, as I still have some doubts about some of the tagging.

The areas I upgraded are residential areas, with multiple residents along the road and real road names.

Some of them seems to be normal public residential roads (Clos du Verger) and others are in private residential areas.

The ones in private residential areas are the ones I am less familiar with, and probably also the ones that got you to raise this question, I assume.

My understanding is that these should be tagged something like:

highway=residential
access=private
ownership=private

Having them tagged as service with no additional tags, doesn't seem correct to me as service roads to me means something that accesses a single house, a business, parking lots, parks, service installations (like towers).

The wiki definition seems to indicate the same:
"Generally for access to a building, service station, beach, campsite, industrial estate, business park, etc. This is also commonly used for access to parking, driveways, and alleys."

Can I ask instead why you think these should be service roads? I'm asking so I can learn other perspectives, I'm not looking for a fight :)
Johnny Carlsen (2022-02-03 05:40:06+00:00): Thank you for a very respectful answer.

I have never been to Jersey myself, but I have many connections there. One of my connections lives in the area I modified, and my tagging is based on what he have told me.

It was very difficult to align the imagery, and my additions are not based on the same alignment (yikes).

Houses are added straight from the Bing alignment as I couldn't find better alignment, and I don't trust the current roads to be aligned.

When adding roads or messing with their geometry I first aligned the imagery with the existing roads. This is to move existing roads as little as possible, and still have the added geometry make sense.

I'm hoping to send someone out with a GPS later this week, and see if I can get enough traces to actually align the imagery correctly.

Also, I agree that access=destination is probably better.

I think lit=yes can be mapped based on Mapillary if there are street lights. But maybe there could be cases where the street lights are no longer in use. I'd be happy to stay away from tagging that.

I'm sure I missed commenting on a lot of things, but I have someone impatiently waiting for me to finish this comment so we can go.

Anyway, thanks for some really good feedback.
Lee Carré (2022-02-01 20:21:39+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Johnny Carlsen (2022-02-02 11:39:07+00:00): Tracing from Bing does seem like a decent description to me, maybe I am wrong.

I mean I could add more details, like:
* Extended road that was longer on Bing
* Removed nodes from straight roads
* Adjusted curves on roads that didn't seem to conform to Bing's imagery
* Added a houses based on Bing imagery

Compared to reading the changeset, does it add enough value to be worth the trouble?

I suppose I could break every edit down into its own changeset, but that seems a bit excessive.
Lee Carré (2022-02-03 00:39:35+00:00): Mentioning what was begin traced, and where, would've made it descriptive.

The likes of source & imagery_used are for indicating where data came from.

The comment is more for what, where, & why.
SomeoneElse (2022-02-13 11:34:56+00:00): Hello,
I've added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026379458 back to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10410519 so that it matches how it was before - https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1g1Q - hope this is OK.
I've also filled in the gap in Moor Lane that had appeared: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1g1R .
Best Regards,
Andy
WalkingMAN (2022-02-13 14:15:49+00:00): Hi Andy,

Thanks for fixing. 

The first bit looks like how I thought I had added anyway. Prior to editing the path was listed as going through a gate on Moor Lane a little further West. So I removed that and put in the new path along with the three stiles. That's what I found when I walked it, and it also aligns the OS map.

The gap possibly appeared after I removed the connecting path on Moor Lane that went through a padock gate lightly more to the West. 

All looks good now anyway.
Cheers,
Mark
Lee Carré (2022-02-01 20:22:08+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
DD1GJ (2022-01-31 13:39:45+00:00): postal_code war eigentlich korrekt. addr wird nur für postaliche Adressen von Gebäuden bzw. Firmen/Geschäften verwendet.
roadbustor (2022-02-01 09:12:25+00:00): Ok, dann habe ich den Hinweis im openstreetmap-wiki falsch verstanden. Also sollte ich es wieder in postal_code ändern, oder?

"Dieses Merkmal kann benutzt werden, um Postleitzahlen an Straßen und Postleitzahlenbezirken zu kartieren. Die Verwendung des Tags ist in Deutschland nicht empfohlen, da die Postleitzahlen landesweit als Gebiete vorhanden sind. " 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:postal%20code?uselang=de
DD1GJ (2022-02-01 09:39:22+00:00): Ändere es bitte wieder zurück. postal_code ist historisch bedingt. Neben Orsknoten wird es noch in Berlin an Straßen verwendet, da dort Straßennahmen in verschiedenen Stadtteilen mehrfach vorkommen können.

Die im Wiki erwähnten PLZ-Gebiete sind auch etwas wackelig, da es keine offiziell verwendbaren Quellen gibt.

addr:postcode ist nur für vollständige postalische Adressen. Sonst gibt es in der Qualitätssicherung Fehlermeldungen wg. unvollständiger Adressen.
KVI0n (2022-01-31 13:23:58+00:00): corrected:#mbx_linters_canada
Krzysiu Jarzyna (2022-01-31 21:11:57+00:00): primary nie jest obligatoryjne dla DK, od tego jest tag z numeracją drogi.

Oznaczone przez Ciebie fragmenty róg nie prowadzą między żadnymi większymi miejscowościami i nie spełniają wymogów dla oznaczenia ich jako primary.
Dawid2849 (2022-01-31 21:56:52+00:00): Ta droga nawet gdy była drogą krajową zasługiwała na secondary, tylko w tamtych czasach kierowano się głównie kategorią urzędową.
maraf24 (2022-01-31 22:30:37+00:00): Autor zmian znów się pochwalił swoją nieznajomością Wrocławia.
Słuszny revert.
Temat-Droga (2022-02-01 16:56:13+00:00): No to w końcu zdecyduj się maraf ta droga jest tranzytowa czy też nie?
vlakos555 (2022-02-02 13:29:13+00:00): Pre Kaderníctvo Rena a Espresso Šípka sa vymazal objekt/dom č.39.  Polohu na mape majú správnu. Vie to niekto opraviť ?
Dodko (2022-02-02 14:55:44+00:00): Zmazaná budova je obnovená.
aceman444 (2022-02-05 21:02:17+00:00): Dakujem za obnovenie.

vkosorin chapeme, ze ste novym pouzivatelom, dakujeme za pridanie novych prevadzok. Ale opatrne, aby sa Vam nestavalo toto, ze zmenite celu budovu na kadernictvo alebo potom celu budovu vymazete.
Dakujem
vlakos555 (2022-02-07 19:26:26+00:00): Ano. Sorry. To boli moje prvé pokusy a sám som sa čudoval, ako som to "dokázal" domrviť. (A že to nie je chránené !)
aceman444 (2022-02-08 21:06:36+00:00): Hej, nie je to chranene. Je to vyhoda aj nevyhoda OSM :)
marczoutendijk (2022-01-31 13:59:36+00:00): Не могли бы вы сделать разумные комментарии к изменениям?
Can you please make sensible changeset comments?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2022-01-31 13:59:12+00:00): Не могли бы вы сделать разумные комментарии к изменениям?
Can you please make sensible changeset comments?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
rthik007 (2022-02-15 11:38:28+00:00): Hi Springhunk ,
Kindly recheck and validate the roads because all the roads are in hilly areas. and we cannot give the classification as unclassified for that roads.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116821432
juminet (2022-02-02 19:53:03+00:00): Bonjour OSMPoilu5 et bienvenue sur OSM!

Pour le chemin que vous avez ajouté, avez-vous besoin d'aide? En effet vous avez mis un attribut "fixme=Chemin praticable". Si vous connaissez le chemin, vous pouvez retirer cet attribut fixme. 

Sinon, pour le tag "highway=footway", on préfère généralement le tag "highway=path" en forêt. "highway=footway" est plus utilisé en milieu urbain. 

Bonne continuation!

juminet
OSMpoilu5 (2022-02-02 19:58:22+00:00): Bonjour et merci
mais comment changer ?
juminet (2022-02-03 19:49:14+00:00): Bonjour, 

Je l'ai fait à l'instant. En fait, lorsque vous cartographiez un élément, tout en bas à gauche de l'écran, vous pouvez voir le détail des attributs. 

Dans votre cas, c'était

highway=footway, surface=ground, width=3, etc. 

Là vous pouvez changer les valeurs des attributs. C'est possible aussi en utilisant les champs au-dessus bien sûr. 

N'hésitez pas si vous avez encore des questions et bonne continuation!

juminet
marczoutendijk (2022-01-31 13:59:04+00:00): Не могли бы вы сделать разумные комментарии к изменениям?
Can you please make sensible changeset comments?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
eggie (2022-01-31 15:56:37+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
marczoutendijk (2022-01-31 13:58:51+00:00): Не могли бы вы сделать разумные комментарии к изменениям?
Can you please make sensible changeset comments?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
maraf24 (2022-01-31 22:26:41+00:00): Już o tych zastępnikach dyskuska była.
Zaprzestań tych edycji.
osmviborg (2022-01-31 13:32:41+00:00): 'Mapping of completely non-existent railways is considered as out of scope for OSM' https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway
eggie (2022-01-31 15:59:19+00:00): Dag preferh

Met deze actie heb je ook een aantal officiële adressen verwijderd.
Zijn hier geen adressen meer?
Je actie: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116822184

MVG
eggie
preferhiking (2022-01-31 16:09:57+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Nee dit klopt. De hele ruimte is doorgetrokken en wordt opnieuw ingericht. Ook alle nummers zijn van het gebouw af. Dit zal waarschijnlijk opnieuw worden ingddeeld.

Mvg!
eggie (2022-01-31 16:24:49+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk..
Mapse
eggie
Sanniu (2022-04-04 06:08:10+00:00): Hi
The sport pitch https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026392008 and service road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026392007 at the same place, probably one of them is erroneous. Which one?
cMartin (2022-01-31 22:35:01+00:00): Hi,
bitte keine einzelne Institute oder Fachgebiete als amenity=university taggen. Das sind keine eigenständigen Hochschulen! Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Duniversity
Lance2403 (2022-02-01 11:37:45+00:00): Hi cMartin,
vielen Dank fürs Fixen. Es war mein erster Eintrag und habe leider kein besseres Tagg gefunden.

VG Andreas
mavl (2022-02-03 15:31:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 116969392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: poor mapping (nonexistent names are added, valid tags are deleted) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5646].
SHICO_POOSHAK@ (2022-01-31 13:30:09+00:00): اوکی
ivanbranco (2022-11-16 11:21:10+00:00): Ciao aa30mom,

grazie per queste modifiche. Ho paura però che tu abbia importato male il csv con Excel (presumo), che ti ha cancellato gli "0" prima dei ref:msal. Le farmacie hanno un numero variabile di cifre, le parafarmacie invece hanno sempre 6 cifre, e riempiono le restanti con "0" all'inizio. Per esempio qua è ref:msal=8231 mentre dovrebbe essere (se il ref è corretto, non ho controllato) ref:msal=008231

Come puoi vedere qua c'è un bel cluster di parafarmacie problematiche a Milano: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nOB

riusciresti a dargli un'occhiata?
aa30mom (2022-11-16 15:02:53+00:00): Ciao ivanbranco,
In effetti ho letto il csv con Excel e non ho visto gli 0 iniziali. Ho corretto le parafarmacia di Milano. Grazie e ciao
MAURO
ivanbranco (2022-11-16 15:06:59+00:00): Grazie a te! Buon mapping :)
micheleOSM3 (2022-12-09 11:56:31+00:00): The name is already in the "relation":
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13571785
The names of the tracks should be set in the "relation" and not on the single "way" which can belong to more than one "relation".
eggie (2022-01-31 16:29:35+00:00): Wellicht even hier kijken.
Wanneer een pad is opgeleverd. Kun je de regel construction=path of pedestrian verwijderen. 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116824883\

MVG
eggie
Jordidv (2022-02-06 10:15:25+00:00): Alle straten die hier niet opgeleverd staan zijn nog niet opgeleverd. De bouwterreinen kloppen niet meer, dat ga ik nog aanpassen. Ter info: ik ben postbezorger en kom hier (tijdelijk) dagelijks. De kaarten gebruiken wij ook voor onze routes. Ben van plan om dit in Utrecht vaker te gaan doen, vooral rond nieuwbouwprojecten. Wij komen daar altijd al rond de oplevering, dan zoeken collega's zich vaak een ongeluk. Win-win dus. En nog leuk ook. Begrijp hoe het werkt inderdaad met de construction tags. Heb ook al een en ander gelezen op de wiki inmiddels. Dat helpt ook. En dank voor het meekijken! Groet, Jordi
sander79 (2022-05-02 06:51:53+00:00): De nieuwe straten zijn nu 'pedestrian'. Klopt dat? Het lijkt me aannemelijker dat het highway=residential moet zijn. Ik zie immers autos op de satelietbeelden staan
Jordidv (2022-05-02 18:23:47+00:00): Op de satellietbeelden zijn nog veel auto's van bouwvakkers te zien. Het zijn inmiddels echte voetgangersstraten met gebodsborden aan de ingangen.
sander79 (2022-05-03 06:27:52+00:00): ok, thanks voor de update !