piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
PeterCooperJr (2022-08-09 14:14:49+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Your changeset asked for a review, so here it is: Adding that crosswalk looks just fine to me. I don't think a lot of people bother with mapping the crosswalk itself as a way (they would just add the node on the road) when the rest of the sidewalks aren't mapped, but it certainly doesn't hurt anything and it's good data to start with in case more footpath mapping happens in the future. Happy mapping!
kogutowicz-mano (2022-08-17 11:18:28+00:00): Kérlek ne tedd vissza a Család utca 8.-t!
RolandHUN_Mapper (2022-08-18 11:30:48+00:00): Rendben. Köszönöm a figyelmeztetést és a hozzászólást.
eggie (2022-08-04 19:24:33+00:00): Vraag voor het forum. Nu is het nog vis nog vlees..
In het forumdraadje zie ik dat description= wordt toegevoegd. 
Dat kan gewoon in het Nederlands.
eggie (2022-08-04 19:30:13+00:00): en wil je het in een andere taa er nog bij dan
    description=* (local language)
    description:de=* (de= German)
    description:en=* (en= English)
user_16742167 (2022-08-04 19:40:29+00:00): Is dit mogelijk te doen via de iD?
eggie (2022-08-04 19:53:08+00:00): Yep...  Even uit mn hoofd, want ik gebruik die editor nooit.
Kies voor Alle tags zichtbaar. Dan kun je kiezen voor aanvullen.. Plusje?
links staat de key (sleutel)
Dat is dan description
en rechts de value (waarde)   Dat is dan je Nederlandse uitleg.

Editor iD is erg beperkt. De doorgewointerde mappers gebruiken JOSM
Daar kun je nu ook al aan beginnen.
Meesr overzicht en goede validator.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2022-08-04 19:58:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:description
santamariense (2022-08-11 15:06:01+00:00): Oi Léo,
Vi que marcou esta via [1] como mão única. Foi engano ou realmente é mão-única. Se for, é realmente todo este trecho?

[1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33826117/history

[]'s
santamariense
PT-53 (2022-08-07 18:30:56+00:00): Hallo Herbert13,
bei dieser Abbiegebeschränkung
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14425911/history
ist dir ein Fehler unterlaufen. Wenn man dort von Norden nur geraden nur geradeaus fahren darf - und nicht auf den Feldweg abbiegen darf, - ist das to-Mitglied falsch ausgewählt.
Berichtigst Du das noch?
Fragende Grüße

PS:
Gefunden mit brouter-suspects
PT-53 (2022-08-10 04:51:22+00:00): Hallo Herbert3,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an oder soll ich die fehlerhafte TR einfach löschen? Diese blockert ein sinnvolles Routing:
http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=13/48.3735/9.2876/standard&lonlats=9.326459,48.364853;9.327554,48.357397&profile=car-eco

Grüße
PS: 
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
PT-53 (2022-08-11 05:43:12+00:00): Fehlerhafte TR gelöscht.
o_andras (2022-08-17 16:24:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2976044
Colin Smale (2022-08-06 20:08:16+00:00): How sure are you that the name is correct?
MrSledge (2022-08-08 18:29:30+00:00): I'm not 100% sure, I named it after the name of the majority of its ways. But why add an unnamed administrative object in the first place? Being administrative implies it is a defined object, so the real question is why is it unnamed to begin with?
SekeRob (2022-08-05 07:03:07+00:00): Pune, India AND a road section in Germany resulting in every mapper in between to get this in their CS history view for the next couple of days. Surely you know the drill.

ciao from Italy
Heinz_V (2022-08-08 21:12:21+00:00): I did not change the road segment in Germany but only had a look. (Strange). The Indian boundary changes was my intention.
user_8101879 (2022-08-13 16:42:45+00:00): Hi,
the relation 12237898 is unclosed because of your 3 changesets on it : could you fix it ?

Best regards
VLD194 (2022-08-30 18:44:13+00:00): Hello @Sam888,

Recently your changes have broke relations. Such as relation #12237898, it is not a closed loop of segments as it should be. If you could, please respond with an explanation for these edits so that we may better understand each others’ thought processes in order to better the map for everyone. 

-Kindly,
Balpreet Sidhu
emersonveenstra (2022-08-05 21:17:15+00:00): Hi,

On https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083871428 you added a cycleway but did not connect it to all the roads that it crossed. The editor warns you when saving, in the future please be sure to fix those warnings before saving. Thanks!
Harringd (2022-08-08 11:58:55+00:00): Thanks, I was not sure how to handle this. It is a cycleway that is separate from the street but it connects at intersections.
eggie (2022-08-04 20:35:38+00:00): Dag Markiemannie... Je vraagt feedback... 
Tip Geen adressen aanmaken in OSM, maar bijtaggen op de bestaande adresnodes. Geen spaties in postcodes. Die format werkt niet.
Ik heb je info samengevoegd met de adresnode.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-08-04 20:37:09+00:00): .. en wat zou dat parkbankje doen op het dak hier?
eggie (2022-08-04 20:44:32+00:00): Het parkbankje naar de juiste plek gesleept aan het water
MxxCon (2022-08-05 04:38:13+00:00): Hello.
Rather than outright delete recently-closed biz, it's generally better to use lifecycle prefixes as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124496210
dafadllyn (2023-04-22 21:10:06+00:00): Ciao Aiman

Purtroppo, i marciapiedi che hai mappato in questa e in altre modifiche presentano parecchi problemi: il loro percorso è molto impreciso (deviazione fino a 10 metri; esempio [^1]), terminano bruscamente senza essere collegati alla strada (esempio [^2]) e non sono collegati agli attraversamenti pedonali (esempio [^3]). Inoltre, c'è un marciapiede che sembra non esistere affatto. [^4]

[^1]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9932725328
[^2]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9932552487
[^3]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/46.01561/8.95131
[^4]: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/46.02852/8.96107

Così, i marciapiedi non sono utili: non possono essere utilizzati per guidare i pedoni.

Ti sarei molto grato se potessi risolvere questi problemi e disegnare i marciapiedi con maggiore attenzione in futuro.

A proposito, è anche possibile mappare i marciapiedi aggiungendo il tag sidewalk=left/right/both alla strada, come è stato fatto in altre zone di Lugano. Questo è più facile e porta a meno problemi.

Cordiali saluti
Raphael
olo81 (2022-08-26 19:07:11+00:00): To że biegły tu kiedyś tory kolejowe nie znaczy że jest to teren poprzemysłowy. Skąd taki pomysł tagowania i oznaczania? 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083875288#map=19/50.23327/19.17472
MxxCon (2022-08-05 04:52:21+00:00): Hello.
When adding features to the map, please pay attention that you don't attach them other features unless it's appropriate. In this case it's unlikely that a UPS dropbox is part of a building's wall or a bench is part of a pier shape itself.
I corrected these issue for you, but please try to avoid gluing/snapping things together unless it is actually like that. 🙂👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124496534
eggie (2022-08-05 06:45:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Tip  Beperk het gebied van je edits. Beter zaken dan toevoegen in meer uploads (changesets) 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-08-04 21:46:12+00:00): Dag Markie  Je vraagt feedback.. 
Let op dat als je bedrijven verwijdert je de adresnode intact laat. Dit was toevallig geen BAG adresnode.
Gr eggie
BCNorwich (2022-08-05 06:21:20+00:00): Hi, I've tweaked the house outlines and addresses. You'd somehow drawn a house atop of another.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2022-08-04 21:47:58+00:00): Geen adressen aanmaken in OSM svp Gebruik de aanwezige adresnodes.
Ik heb de info weer samengevoegd
gr eggie
eggie (2022-08-04 21:49:01+00:00): En helaas verwijder je weer de adresnode.
Bestaat dan het adres niet meer als een restaurant stopt?
eggie (2022-08-04 21:50:33+00:00): adresnode hersteld
highflyer74 (2022-08-05 08:02:54+00:00): Moin und danke für deinen Beitrag!

Stimmt, ein Radweg ist das nicht, das stammte noch aus alten Tagen, wo Wege anders gemappt wurden. Ist es aber ein =footway? Dies würde einem mit dem blauen Fußgängerschild ausgeschilderten Weg entsprechen. Wenn dort kein Schild steht, wäre es ein highway=path. Alternativ ist auf dem ganzen Friedhof Radfahren verboten, dann wäre =footway auch sinnvoll.

Kannst Du Dich noch erinnern?

Viele Grüße!
krolok (2022-08-05 11:38:46+00:00): Moin highflyer74, die Wege auf dem Friedhof sind unterschiedlich gemappt (=path; die meisten =footway). Auf dem gesamten Friedhof gilt ein Verbot für Fahrzeuge (sicher außer besonders Berechtigter wie Gärtnereien), was in der Praxis nicht eingehalten / durchgesetzt wird. Ich kenne die Praxis zur Verwendung von path/ footway nicht genau, aber so ist es besser als vorher. Gruß, krolok.
highflyer74 (2022-08-05 11:46:09+00:00): Hallo und danke für deine Rückmeldung. Ich gucke mir das nochmal an. Ggf. ist da noch mehr im Argen, und dann kann man mal den ganzen Friedhof aktualisieren.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-05 00:20:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199.
eggie (2022-08-04 21:36:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Zou je je edit gebied kunnen beperken tot bv een straat en niet half Europa.
Je edits zijn zo niet te controleren.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-05 00:20:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199.
VLD190 (2022-08-31 21:39:58+00:00): Hello @Sam888,

Recently your changes have broken a relation, such as relation #14426779. It is not a closed loop of segments as it should be, If you could please provide an explanation so that we may better understand each others’ thought processes. If an explanation is not provided, I will have to revert the changeset 124498244.
eggie (2022-08-04 21:38:34+00:00): Wanneer je iets beschijft niet name=  gebruiken, maar description=  description:en=
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-04 21:39:48+00:00): aangepast naar description=
YomanNH (2022-08-04 22:32:53+00:00): Poprawiłem błędy, które zrobiłeś. Polecam poczytać: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Rowery#Wsp.C3.B3lna_.C5.9Bcie.C5.BCka_rowerowa_i_chodnik.2C_z_osobn.C4.85_nawierzchni.C4.85
Rashid86 (2022-08-05 10:29:39+00:00): Are you sure there is a pipeline here?
gscholz (2023-01-11 09:29:33+00:00): Hi Guenichi_Hajer,
your edits around this time have created errors in the OSM database regarding wrongly assigned relation roles:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.03727&lat=33.80074&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Obviously you have assigned the "outer" role to inner parts and the "inner role to outer parts of buildings.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
impiaaa (2022-08-05 13:54:39+00:00): Especially for such a large changeset area, please write more descriptive changeset comments. Here are some guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
4b696d (2022-08-06 10:16:52+00:00): Moin,
kurz- und mittelfristige Sperrungen von Straßen sollten nicht mit "highway=construction" gekennzeichnet werden sondern einen zusätzlichen Tag in der Art
access:conditional=no @ (2018 May 22-2018 Oct 7) erhalten.
Abgesehen davon hast du z. B. an der B170 auch die Eigenschaft primary_link entfernt und somit auch das Tagging von Baustellen falsch angewendet.

Siehe dazu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=construction?uselang=de

Das Problem ist, dass viele Dienste die Daten aus OSM nur in großen Zeitabständen ziehen und das dann zur Folge haben kann, dass so kleine Baustellen noch Monate nach der Fertigstellung in den Datensätzen auftauchen. Selbiges gilt für gedruckte Karten.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-05 00:20:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199.
cytryn (2022-08-21 09:15:10+00:00): Cześć,
Tutaj warto by jeszcze dopisać shop=hardware, tylko zastanawiam się, czy do istniejącego punktu, czy jako osobny poi
NieWnen (2022-08-21 09:25:28+00:00): Fakt brakowało tagu sklepu. 

Usunąłem te office, bo w sumie i tak już jest budynek office obok, a było pewnie dodane tylko w celu renderingu i dodałem shop=hardware, bo to jest w sumie istotniejsze niż samo biuro.

Dzięki za znalezienie.
aceman444 (2022-12-18 11:13:23+00:00): Tak ste plochu mali zmenit na landuse=residential (ako naznacovalo construction=residential), nie ju vymazat.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-05 00:20:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-05 00:20:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124500818 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6199.
Leonardop448 (2022-08-04 23:15:41+00:00): Señor, le garantizo yo que vivo en este pueblo, que hay 30 o 40 calles nuevas es este barrio que no aparecen en Strava y en Sentinel si que menos
Leonardop448 (2022-08-04 23:17:28+00:00): No dañe el mapa que otros han realizado si usted no puede ir hasta el sitio y constatar lo que esta haciendo, las imagenes satelitales estan muy desactualizadas, No perjudique la comunidad de OSM
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-04 23:19:25+00:00): Y ser local no significa necesariamente que estés agregando calidad. Verás, hay herramientas con las que he notado que has desalineado varios caminos. No necesito ser un lugar para usarlo, sirven para verificar solo eso. Y entiendo que Strava realmente no muestra todos los carriles, pero estoy seguro de que demuestra la alineación donde existen sus trazos.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-04 23:22:39+00:00): Y solo porque no soy de este pueblo no significa que podrías haber destruido mi trabajo como lo hiciste. Y lo hiciste antes que yo, yo solo deshice lo que hiciste.
Leonardop448 (2022-08-04 23:27:18+00:00): señor pues simplemente alineelos y ya, pero como elimina las calles nuevas, es que lo que se trata es de cada quien contribuir como pueda, volvio las calles de ese barrio a como estaban casi 3 años atras, pudo haber alineado las calles y hubiera quedado perfecto.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-04 23:29:34+00:00): no es posible alinear con la calidad de lo contrario tengo fotos satelitales o rastros de gps. sería un trabajo chapucero como el que hiciste, al parecer. nada es mejor que algo totalmente irreal.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-04 23:40:30+00:00): Es simple, solo agregue lo que esté seguro de la ubicación y la alineación y no lo revertiré. no es interesante agregar algo pensando que alguien tendrá que arreglarlo, ya lo agregue correctamente.
Leonardop448 (2022-08-04 23:57:54+00:00): Es más simple aún! No elimine lo se no puede comprobar si este existe o no y menos para desactualizar el mapa, más bien deje el comentario de que se debe alinear mejor y ya, que el mapa no es suyo ni usted es el dueño de esto para retroceder el mapa 2 años atrás simplemente porque no le aparece en su mapa de comparación
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-05 00:12:55+00:00): si realmente tienes los tracks de GPS como te dije mandalos al proyecto.  para que podamos comprobar si es correcto.  en https://www.openstreetmap.org/traces/new y seleccione visibilidad "pública".  pero compruebe si la precisión es realmente buena.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-08 14:42:43+00:00): todas tus ediciones han sido eliminadas. son puntos personales con nombres de personas, no de empresas.
Denis_Helfer (2022-08-05 07:25:20+00:00): Bonjour,
Un pic en pleine ville ? vraiment ?
VLD190 (2022-08-05 21:50:16+00:00): Hi @Sam888, 

I noticed that your recent changes may have broken relation # 14377531. I want to get some more clarification on these edits to get a better understanding of the features that you added. I noticed that the edits did not create a closed loop, thus breaking the relation. 

Best regards,
- David Todorut
gscholz (2023-01-11 09:29:37+00:00): Hi Guenichi_Hajer,
your edits around this time have created errors in the OSM database regarding wrongly assigned relation roles:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.03727&lat=33.80074&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Obviously you have assigned the "outer" role to inner parts and the "inner role to outer parts of buildings.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
AdamPlayer (2022-09-30 15:24:19+00:00): Are these meant for the open historical map? It's common practice to only map what's physically there. Many of these rail lines have been completely built over.
jleedev (2022-08-05 15:13:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 00:25:13+00:00): Creo que esta ruta es de tipo path y no track: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083897078#map=16/16.7667/-96.3548
arvdk (2022-08-05 19:45:08+00:00): Hi Jaden, thank you for your contributions. I would like to ask you to reply on my previous question. For this changeset, I have some questions and feedback:
1. What is de source of your edits? local knowledge, or Bing Maps? both? You can add this info in your changeset, so mappers don't have to ask ;)
2. Why did you delete the chimney? Is it no longer there? It is still there on Bing?
3. It seems that your outline of the factory is based on the roof. If you look closely, you can see that the different heights of the factory plays tricks on you, since the imagery is made on an angle. Try to use the building base, that will be more accurate.
4. Point 3 also applies to the storage tanks. Besides, iD editor has a 'circularize' option to get them perfectly round. (Use right-click, or short-key 'o'.)

Keep up the good work :)
silversurfer83 (2022-08-05 12:58:19+00:00): Hi Weltmaennchen,

herzlich Willkommen bei OSM :) Schön, dass du StreetComplete nutzt um die Datenbank zu verbessern.
Eine Bitte hätte ich an Dich: Drück doch häufiger auf den Upload Knopf oben rechts in der Ecke, da sich deine Änderungen sonst über ganz Deutschland erstrecken :)
(siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)

Weiter viel Spaß mit StreetComplete

-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124500610
Weltmaennchen (2022-08-05 14:35:40+00:00): Hallo silversurfer83,

danke, das ist ein sehr guter Hinweis!

Schöne Grüße 

Weltmaennchen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-05 00:20:52+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124498105, 124498210, 124498937, 124499094, 124499173, 124499265, 124500184, 124500476, 124500525, 124500659.
MxxCon (2022-08-05 05:04:55+00:00): A ferry terminal shouldn't be attached to the outline of pier. It should be inside the perimeter of it. I fixed it up for you.🙂
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124500996
MxxCon (2022-08-05 05:08:39+00:00): Wouldn't it be more appropriate to use ref= tags for these parking lots rather than naming them 1 and 2?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124501593
zhik (2022-08-06 01:06:19+00:00): I didn't know about that tag. When I walked by there was signage and I was following along with other edit done with Area 3. I will keep this in mind when tagging in the future.
NorthCrab (2022-09-12 18:36:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5877984701/history

To nie jest "Kołobrzeski Rower Miejski", a "Koniński Rower Miejski". Proszę uważać na sugestie edytora iD. Zwłaszcza te rowerowe :P
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 14:47:06+00:00): ¿Hay un castillo aquí?
eggie (2022-08-05 05:22:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Dit kan beter getagd woden met highway=service, want het loopt zo te zien over het eigen terrein.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-08-05 05:32:57+00:00): aangepast..
izolight (2022-08-05 08:38:43+00:00): I think the apartment unit numbers should be tagged with addr:unit instead of name (both will render in carto). Though going over taginfo it seems that addr:unit is barely used in South Korea with just under 1000 uses, but name with the apartment number has over 10000 uses.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124502884
eggie (2022-08-05 05:40:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  Mooi weer actueler, maar... Dit is een officeel wandelpad aangegeven met G7  Dus geen highway=unclassified. 
Ik heb wat aangepast hier.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
emvee (2022-08-05 07:00:12+00:00): Hi Shwgu,

Thanks for adding this road, but you forgot to add the crossing of the cycleway, see also the warning above "warnings:crossing_ways:highway-highway"

Can you correct that?

Greetings,

Martin.
eggie (2022-08-05 07:33:38+00:00): Hint.. Shifting the map in editmodus may harm the map.
You moved the addressnodes...
The road in fact is not a residential but an highway=service. .. probably .. access=private.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-08-05 07:34:01+00:00): Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=124503369
eggie (2022-08-05 07:35:19+00:00): fixed errors
eggie (2022-08-05 05:25:36+00:00): Dit kan beter getagd worden met highway=service, want het maakt geen onderdeel uit van het officiële wegennet.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-05 05:32:15+00:00): aangepast
eggie (2022-08-05 05:51:34+00:00): Hoi praty Dits is een highway=service service=driveway Ik heb het aangepast.
Het maakt geen onderdeel uit van het officiele wegennet.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-05 07:38:15+00:00): In English.. Thes are no official roads but driveways
higheay=service
Probably access=private
Please have a look again.
eggie