piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ChehrehBargi (2023-06-19 04:13:12+00:00): I read the project that you started then. It was a big job. But in order to avoid those problems, users can be introduced to a resource that will teach polygon drawing in all conditions according to Wiki rules without ambiguity and in simple and complete language. In this case, we have millions of editors who know how to record in a way that is correct.
blef (2021-03-12 14:25:44+00:00): Bonjour,

L'usage veut que les noms soient écrits en minuscules, sauf la première initiale:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name?uselang=fr
Donc, ici: Gardey
Vinber-Pro (2021-03-14 08:52:47+00:00): Merci @Blef !
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:40:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Kovoschiz (2021-03-12 12:57:23+00:00): Aside from a wrong changeset comment, why isn't this a `bridge=`?
Gregory UKR (2021-03-14 15:43:07+00:00): Доброго дня, Ірино! Якщо цікавить як там справи у конкурентів, то можна подивитись як щось намальоване в Google Maps чи то в Waze, TomTom, HERE, etc. Але їхні карти захищені авторськими та іншими правами, тому ми не можемо будь-яким чином спиратись на те що в них. В OSM ми самі по собі намагаємось найкраще відобразити реальність. Щодо доріг, то в OSM переважає думка що якщо проїзні частини фізично відокремлені (відбійниками, розділювальною смугою, трамвайними коліями, тощо), то їх варто позначати окремо. А в інших випадках, за відсутності істотної причини, дорога зазвичай позначається однією лінією. З повагою, Gregory
IrinaRia (2021-03-15 09:42:36+00:00): Доброго дня. Я послалась на карту Гугл, тому що на карті дуже добре видно розв'язку. Я працюю в логістиці і в мене є підтвердження відбитих треків в різний період часу з різних авто саме так як я намалювала. Якщо потрібні скріни підтвердження - я надам. Із за неправильно намальованої розв'язки - неправильно накладається план та факт в логістичній програмі якій я працюю
Gregory UKR (2021-03-15 20:34:28+00:00): Доброго дня, Ірино! Щодо великих вулиць та перехресть Києва, то наче достатньо треків у Strava (ось узагальнене зображення наявних в них на сьогодні треків цього перехрестя https://ibb.co/XxnRY0v ). Strava дозволяє використовувати такі теплові карти для наповнення OSM. Крім того, на доступних аерофотознімках Київ відносно добре відображений. Ось тільки ці фотознімки іноді дещо зміщені відносно реальності. Ви редагуєте OSM через вебсайт використовуючи редактор iD і, нажаль, в ньому відсутня можливість змістити фотознімки. Більш популярний редактор JOSM дозволяє і додати теплову карту Strava як окремий шар, і змістити фотознімки, і взагалі робити більш складні виправлення. Цей редактор довше освоювати, але при нагоді раджу спробувати. Повертаючись до цього перехрестя, ось так як воно зараз намальоване, воно Вас задовольняє, чи Ви вважаєте щось все ж таки повинно бути по іншому? Успіхів, Gregory
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:38:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:28:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
carfog81 (2021-03-15 16:24:57+00:00): Por favor, no dañar las relaciones tipo ruta
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
tonyf1 (2021-10-29 01:15:01+00:00): see Changeset #113102204
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:33:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
tonyf1 (2021-10-29 01:06:00+00:00): see  Changeset #113102139
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:37:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
faustopt (2021-03-31 14:36:48+00:00): Porque razão está tudo em MAIÚSCULAS? A Regra é em Capitulares (Promeira letra de cada palavra em Maiúscula). Se é iniciante no OSM Antes de editar consulte as Boas Práticas em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_pr%C3%A1ticas
olo81 (2021-03-12 15:53:41+00:00): auto komis to nie landuse=industrial, 
brakuje tagów:
second_hand=only
shop=car
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-20 12:32:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/33013169/history - to powinno być wikipedia=pl:Wisła a nie wikipedia=Wisła

Poprawiłem - jak chcesz to możesz zerknąc na https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/ i poprawić inne podobne
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:41:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:31:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
wolfbert (2025-07-04 14:23:43+00:00): Hallo, die einzeln gemappten 30er-Zeichen sind streng genommen nicht ganz exakt und müssten traffic_sign=AT:52.11a[52.10a[30]] sein. Gibt's aber wahrscheinlich öfter so.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:27:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
BCNorwich (2021-06-03 06:40:41+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

The school is already mapped (Way: 353161178) as a multipolygon. I've added the name to the relation.

Regards Bernard.
tux67 (2021-03-12 13:50:57+00:00): Hi,
warum nur an diesem Segment die destination tags?

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100908562
Neuwessi11 (2021-03-13 02:31:56+00:00): Wo gehört es denn noch hin? Ich habe im Wiki gelesen, dass man ein Schild an der jeweiligen Straße direkt hinter dem Schild taggen soll. Und wenn man aus der Hubertusstraße kommt, fährt man direkt auf dieses Schild zu, das quasi am vordersten Container des Müllplatzes festgeschraubt ist und mittels eines Pfeiles nach links zeigt.

Gruß
Neuwessi11
tux67 (2021-03-13 11:09:06+00:00): Ich denke mal die beiden hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/37571649
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272373023
Auf die musst du ja, um in die beschriebene Richtung abzubiegen und von diesen Wegen aus blickst du auf das Schild, wenn ich deine Beschreibung richtig sehe?
Gruß
tux67
Neuwessi11 (2021-03-14 12:18:43+00:00): Ja, völlig richtig.
Kann ich auch machen. Dabei frage ich mich dann, ob das dann tagging for the renderer wäre oder nicht. 
Wie gesagt, ich habe im Wiki gefunden, dass Schilder an der Straße direkt hinter dem Schild getaggt werden. Aber ich kann mir auch gut vorstellen, das nicht ganz richtig verstanden oder etwas übersehen zu haben.
Gruß
Neuwessi11
Neuwessi11 (2021-03-14 12:20:42+00:00): Und eine andere Frage ist bei mir noch aufgetaucht: So, wie ich es getaggt habe, sieht man im Navi das Schild wahrscheinlich, wenn man die Dahlener Straße von rechts kommt. Aber sieht man es auch, wenn man von der Hubertusstraße kommt?
tux67 (2021-03-15 07:32:22+00:00): Hi,
also wenn, dann wäre es tagging für den router .. ;-) der Renderer berrechnet die einzelnen "Kacheln" der Karte - und ich kenne keinen Kartensti,l der das direction tag auswertet. 
Die Anzeige im "Navi" habe ich gerade mal mit dem jetzigen Status und Osmand (mit live Daten) ausprobiert. Von der Hubertusstraße aus kommend wird die Direction angezeigt. Sieht also gut aus. Von Rheydt kommend auf der Dahlender Straße wird nix angezeigt, aber das ist ja auch ok so, denn da ändert man die Richtung ja nicht und das Schild ist (wenn ich dich recht verstanden habe) ja für die von der Hubertusstaße kommenden sichtbar.
Scheint also alles gut so.
Danke & Gruß
tux67
Neuwessi11 (2021-03-15 14:00:44+00:00): Das sieht doch gut aus, denn so, wie es Dir angezeigt wurde, ist es auch in natura.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:44:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
olo81 (2021-03-12 15:37:58+00:00): ulice czy ronda jeśli mają nazwy można je znaleźć w GUGIK
to rondo nie ma nazwy. 
Jeśli niby ktoś tak mówi to jest tag loc_name=*  ale w przypadku dróg chyba nie powinno się go używać 
Pisze pan "tak nazywają nie wiem czy dodać" ale i tak dodaje.  Jeśli wszystkie zmyślone nazwy będzie się uspraywiedliać tym że ktoś tak mówi ta mapa będzie nic nie warta. 
Wywalam to.
C2oc4 (2021-03-14 10:14:33+00:00): Dodałem bo spotkałem się z takim na forum Sosnowiec i w kilku gazetach były „”
Nomadmapper (2021-03-12 13:13:38+00:00): Il existe la possibilité, afin d'être parfaitement synchro avec les tags OSM, d'ajouter plusieurs spécialités en médecine (toujours en anglais, séparées par des points virgules): 
par exemple -> healthcare:speciality=general;phlebology;rheumatology
Ici la liste : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare:speciality?uselang=fr

Très bien de laisser médecin thermal en description.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100909175
eggie (2021-03-12 12:56:23+00:00): Dag Lim...   Het hoort gewoon te werken zonder foot=yes  en dat zie je hier.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=51.5885%2C5.1512%3B51.5860%2C5.1519#map=18/51.58725/5.15164

foot=yes is default op fietspaden in Nederland.
Dat je het nu goed ziet routeren is nog van voor je wijziging. 

MVG
eggie
MKnight (2021-03-12 20:09:45+00:00): Moin, ich habe Deine Änderungen hier zurückgesetzt.
Grund: 
- Du hast hier ein gutes Dutzend Wege gelöscht um diese neu einzuzeichnen. Das ist nicht verboten, aber unüblich, weil es die Historie der Elemente zerstört.
- Des Weiteren hast Du Wege zugefügt, die nicht existieren.
-- damit einhergehend Phantasie-turn:lanes gesetzt
- zusätzlich fehlt nach Deiner Änderung die Zugehörigkeit zu verschiedenen Relationen
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:32:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
faustopt (2021-03-21 15:44:33+00:00): Nome Incorreto/Utilização abusiva de marca Registada - A utilização da marca "Kónica" para identificar Centros de Cópias/Fotografia é incorreta. "Konica" é uma marca registada (Hoje Konica-Minolta) e a sua identificação em estabelecimentos que nada tem a ver com a referida marca não só é errado como induz em erro para quem procura serviços de venda/manutenção da referida marca. A utilização de nomes informais está bem documentada na wiki e deve ser consultada em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Key:name 
Neste caso específico deve ser incluida a Etiqueta Nome Local (loc_name=) pois essa designação representa um regionalismo ou nome local pelo qual estes estabelecimentos são conhecidos em Angola, tal como no Brasil são conhecidos por “Xerox”.
A Edição será alterada para:
name=Centro de Cópias/Fotografia
loc_name=Kónica
eggie (2021-03-12 16:02:41+00:00): Beste Werner, 
Je bospad heb je aan e..o.a. grens vastgemaakt aan de oostzijde en zal niet kunnen routeren.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-12 16:03:34+00:00): http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100910158
eggie (2021-03-12 16:22:13+00:00): Track losgemaakt van grens Natuurgebied bos en verbonden met Dasselaarweg.
Wel even van dat stukje een highway=path gemaakt.
Of is dat geschikt en toegestaan voor voertuigen met vier wielen? 
gr eggie
NLWerner (2021-03-12 16:35:46+00:00): Hoi Eggie, nee is niet geschikt voor 4 wielers, is echt een bospad. Bedankt voor je hulp, het is allemaal nog nieuw voor me. Gr, Werner
eggie (2021-03-12 16:39:14+00:00): Werner.. laat je niet weerhouden door kritiek.. we kijken in het begin mee.. maar uiteraard om te helpen..
Iedereen was ooit beginner..
Mapse
Eggie
pitscheplatsch (2021-04-05 13:05:03+00:00): Hallo donald_tina,

die Ergänzung des Weges[1] musste ich ändern. Dies ist komplett kein Service Weg und die Nutzung ist auch für Anlieger nicht frei. Es handelt sich hier um highway=track und motor_vehicle=agricultural;forestry.

Grüße
Pascal

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25152144/history
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:43:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
user_5359 (2021-03-12 15:30:52+00:00): Hello! You forgot to add the type of the relation, and please use the key name instead of Name.

Please notice also, there are two gaps inside of the relation.
If you need help, You are welcome!
Martin Tatzber (2021-10-04 09:38:06+00:00): Woher kommt die Info der Verlängerung Linie O, Phase II (Bruno-Malek-Allee bis Friedrich-Engels-Platz)? Auf der Seite der Stadt Wien unter Straßenbahnplanung finde ich dazu nichts.
Huldega (2021-10-05 09:12:33+00:00): Hierzu den User befragen, der das eingetragen hat (siehe Änderungsverlauf). Ich habe mich um das korrekte Tagging der Elektrifizierung gekümmert.
SafetyIng (2021-03-12 20:57:54+00:00): Ist das Feld der vereinten Nationen nicht eher 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cemetery%3Dsector
oder noch passender: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cemetery%3Dwar_cemetery
?
Vollis (2021-03-12 21:13:13+00:00): "Sector" ginge auf jeden Fall, bei "war cemetery" bin ich mir nicht sicher. Ich hab da bloß einen Tippfehler ausgebessert, weil ich eh gerade auf dem Friedhof beschäftigt war, und mich mit dem Rest nicht befasst. Übrigens müsste man das laut Wikipedia mit einem großen V schreiben; da bin ich auch nicht drangegangen.
SimonPoole (2021-09-12 09:20:17+00:00): Hoi chnuessli, denke hier fehlt aber schon ein building tag (denn ein Gebäude ist es ohne Zweifel :-)).
chnuessli (2021-09-12 16:25:12+00:00): I agree :)
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-17 19:05:21+00:00): Olá,

esta restrição de conversão incluída por você:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12435144

Não está com os membros conectados.

Você poderia excluir ou consertar ela?
eggie (2021-03-12 15:57:22+00:00): Oke.. culvert korter... maar een drain is geen beek.
Wanneer het niet de tag stream verdient dan toch wel waterway=ditch? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddrain
Gr eggie
Vinber-Pro (2021-03-14 08:51:43+00:00): man_made=water_tap correspond à des robinets. Si le souhait est de qualifier des points d'eau potables accessibles, alors il est préférable d'utiliser amenity=drinking_water
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100911934
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
felipeeugenio (2021-03-12 14:23:36+00:00): Estimado: Los nombres antiguos de las calles van con old_name=*. slaudos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100911987
G_P_J (2021-03-15 01:22:05+00:00): Bardzo proszę - nie dodawaj tagu addr:city do adresów bez ulicy. Adres ma już poprawny tag addr:place
NGL-engel (2023-04-16 09:28:14+00:00): Hallo Fippe, 
   ich glaube Dir ist dort ein Fehler unterlaufen. Wenn ich richtig geschaut habe gehört Bottorf nach deinen Bearbeitungen nicht mehr zu Menslage. Bottorf ist aber nach wie vor ein Teil der Gemeinde Menslage ;-) 
Wäre nett wenn Du Bottorf wieder eingemeinden könntest. (Bei Gemeindegrenzen bin ich nicht so fit, möchte es darum ungerne selbst machen.)
Gruß 
   NGL-engel
Cristoffs (2021-03-14 23:06:49+00:00): Przepraszam Bardzo, ale możesz powiedzieć co chcesz dodać lub zmienić? Bo w ten sposób dodając obiekty potem (w zestawie 100912859) usuwając możesz coś uszkodzić w bazie danych.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100912751
Leo Slager (2021-03-13 15:03:23+00:00): De weg is al meer dan 11 jaar voorzien van de tag access=no.
Het is dus allemaal correct op de kaart. highway=residential is niet juist. motorvehicle=no is zinloos omdat er al access=no op staat.
En welke app routeert dan over de brug ?
Leo Slager (2021-03-13 15:07:34+00:00): Of zijn er gewoon slimme chauffeurs die alle verboden aan hun laars lappen of hebben die tijdelijk ontheffing van de wegbeheerder ?
Bram bwaste (2021-03-15 11:39:24+00:00): Ik kon zelf ook geen fouten vinden maar het is juist een klacht van de chauffeurs dat ze eroverheen geleid (zouden) worden. Openstreetmap is gekoppeld deze app: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=bwaste.routing&hl=nl&gl=US. Ik zal vragen om een printscreen dat ze er daadwerkelijk in de app overheen gestuurd worden.
Leo Slager (2021-03-15 12:24:02+00:00): Er staan dus geen fouten in OSM.
De ingebouwde routers geven ook geen route over de brug, wel voor fietsers en voetgangers maar niet voor auto's.
Ergo de fout zit dus in de gebruikte app.
Die weet kennelijk niet wat access=no betekent.
eggie (2022-12-06 14:39:07+00:00): Maar helaas is Bram doorgegaan met het op slot zetten van wegen. Momenteel worden de changesets gecheckt voorzover dat mogelijk is en de routering hersteld.

MVG
eggie
mueschel (2021-03-17 13:54:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
In OSM we have to use a well-defined set of tags to allow all the software tools to understand the data and e.g. show it on maps.
You used many tags that are not used in other places and are not documented.

It seems you're mapping as part of your job - this must be made clear on your user page.

Also, you closed many roads with a access=no tag - are these roads really explicitly closed to users like horses, inline_skates, speed_pedelecs...? Please never use this tag to close a road for motorized traffic!
Municipality of Florence Official (2021-03-18 15:18:26+00:00): Hello!
We are trying to describe the access policy to pedestrian areas in Florence using tags. We intended to create new tags as no tags have been found responding to the information need. Some streets are closed to any mode of transport except pedestrian. Where some categories are allowed we used mode-specific tags to describe it. Of course if something has been misunderstood we are ready to change it.
mueschel (2021-03-18 15:43:30+00:00): The documentation of keys is definitely not perfect - for new contributors it's the best to just ask for help in one of the many communication channels available. 
I'm not familiar with the precise access rules for these streets, but I'm pretty sure you're overcomplicating the issue. There is almost never a need to have more than a couple access tags on one road - 16 is way too much.

I'm very happy to assist here - could you give a (verbal) description of the rules to one example of the streets?
Municipality of Florence Official (2021-03-22 15:49:02+00:00): I try to explain. First of all, in the Access restrictions (the table) we put access to anyone=no and then we put "yes" to all the categories allowed (i.e. bike, horses, pedestrian). This was intended to be the main information to be used for travel planning etc. Moreover, where the regulation allows particular user categories (i.e Users that goes to a hotel  or to a parking) we used "tags" as we thought that it was just an additional information not affecting the main circulation rules, that is to say, you can ignore the tag or use it, if you want.
mueschel (2021-03-22 15:59:21+00:00): This approach will not work - there are too many distinct sets of users and use cases. 

With this approach, each application has to be able to understand each of your (new and undocumented) tags to get the routing right - that's why you shouldn't use access=no at all.
These tags will make routing on these streets almost impossible - especially because it seems that every stretch of road has another set of special tags.

As I wrote above - please describe what the actual rules are and I'm happy to help writing a set of access tags to translate that to OSM.
Municipality of Florence Official (2021-03-22 16:24:51+00:00): It is the very centre of Florence, access is forbidden to all vehicles except:
bike
horses
pedestrian
handcart
postal service
psv
resident with permit
people going to a hotel
people going to a parking
urban hygiene service
emercency vehicles
electric vehicles
mueschel (2021-03-22 17:13:49+00:00): Thanks for the list,
please let me answer with a list of questions for clarification:


-"electric vehicles"- that's any car or truck with electric motor? Does it include bicycles with motor (speed pedelecs) or electric kick-scooters?

- things like postal service, emergency vehicles or urban hygienic service are usually not tagged, as these are allowed on any road like these if it's necessary for their work. This should rather be tagged only if they are *not* allowed somewhere or are the designated users.

- are there vehicles without a motor that are not allowed? Think kick-scooters, inline skates...

- what about delivery vehicles of any size?