piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
muralito (2019-07-26 13:37:20+00:00): Por favor, no poner datos inventados, como los nombres.
sannkc (2019-07-28 19:16:13+00:00): Hello!  I was reviewing some St. Louis edits and happened to see this changeset. 
 I can see what prompted the change.  There's definitely a sign that prohibits commercial vehicles from accessing the street unless making deliveries.  

What I'm unsure about is the access=destination tag.  That tag implies that nothing (including commercial vehicles, regular vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, etc.) is allowed to pass along the street unless going to a destination along the street.  But that doesn't appear to be the case here, since the restriction applies to a specific type of user/vehicle and a specific type of activity.

Based on the guidance in the OSM wikis, I'm thinking that goods=delivery and hgv=delivery would be more appropriate tages here.  I'm interpreting the sign's statement about "loading unloading" as equivalent to "delivery."  And I'm also assuming that "commercial vehicles" covers all types of goods vehicles and not just heavy goods vehicles.  The sign also says that commercial vehicles may engage in "servicing," but I'm not sure how to best express that in an OSM tag.  Any thoughts?
gseethar (2019-07-31 18:18:06+00:00): Hi Sannkc,

Thanks a lot for your suggestion. As mentioned in the other comment, we will definitely take this up and perform our analysis and get back to you at the earliest.

Please continue to provide your valuable suggestions that will help us further improve our edits.

Regards,
Ganesh
4004 (2020-02-25 14:34:53+00:00): Бондаров?
Dimacn (2019-07-26 05:50:34+00:00): В этой правке вы удалили здание детского сада по адресу Попова 65 и на его месте нарисовали свое с неправильным адресом. Так делать нельзя! Ваши действия подпадают под понятие вандализм. Исправлять теги и геометрию нужно у существующих объектов, а не удалять их! Пожалуйста теперь исправьте адрес на правильный.
sabre23ts (2020-11-14 08:26:44+00:00): This Bandar Bestari boundary is incorrect. It is not here.
naoliv (2019-09-18 18:51:37+00:00): iLukSbr, por favor, não grude nenhuma área nas ruas ao redor.
Desenhe os prédios e outros tipos de área apenas com o espaço real que ocupam.
Grudar as áreas nas ruas causa vários problemas, além de acabar representando o objeto de forma incorreta (com uma área maior do que a realidade).
Dimacn (2019-07-26 06:07:19+00:00): Спасибо за уточнение карты. Небольшой но важный совет (т.к. ваши объекты оказались некорректно смещены). Перед началом непосредственного редактирования карты, чтобы объекты соответствовали реальному месторасположению, нужно подложку выровнять по GPS трекам. Как это сделать описано здесь - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2
aharvey (2025-03-27 12:05:28+00:00): From what I can see the operator is Metropolitan Memorial Parks https://www.metropolitanmemorialparks.com.au/locations/field-of-mars-cemetery

Given you added both Northern Cemeteries and Ryde City Council I wanted to check with you if you had any extra local knowledge?
aharvey (2025-03-27 12:09:50+00:00): Sorry I just found out "On 1 July 2023, MMP was officially formed through
the amalgamation of three previous cemetery
operators and Crown land managers: Northern
Cemeteries, Rookwood General Cemeteries and
Southern Metropolitan Cemeteries."
 So that answers the Northern Cemeteries piece, but not sure about the Council?
WoodWoseWulf (2025-03-27 19:20:37+00:00): Hi. There have been some pretty big changes to how cemeteries are administered over the past 3 or so years, so I'm not sure if the Council would still be relevant now that Metropolitan Memorial Parks has now replaced the previous operators.
aharvey (2019-07-26 06:47:58+00:00): Hi there, the public_transport=station tag only applies to train stations part of a public transport network, which these are not. If you remove that tag then this looks good, thanks.
Wallip (2019-07-26 07:11:52+00:00): Hi.
Understand, and will make a note for future. Open maps is used a fair bit by railfans, so as these are rail terminals I was marking them as such, but no stress.
Cheers
aharvey (2019-07-26 10:44:03+00:00): No I mean just the public_transport=station tag doesn't make sense here. So no need to delete the whole object, just the public_transport tag.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=station and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=station. For railway stations which are part of the public transport network you'd use railway=station + public_transport=station + train=yes. For railway stations which aren't part of the public transport network you'd only use railway=station and not the other tags.

So I'd encourage you to please add these back into OSM if they exist on the ground.
Gas & Electric (2019-08-19 00:17:58+00:00): Please remove the tag "source"="PGS" after you've improved a certain coastline.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:44:54+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:45:23+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:45:49+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
chnav (2019-07-26 06:05:44+00:00): Пожалуйста не удаляйте здания, нарисованные другими пользователями. Если здание снесено, то можно изменить теги на landuse=brownfield (расчищеное место под строительство). 

Если что-то удаляете, обязательно пишите причину в комментарии, например "здание снесено".
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:46:52+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Shl-EF (2020-08-30 22:11:06+00:00): Hallo IndivStyle,
Etwa 180 m süd-süd-westlich war schon ein Rettungspunkt mit der selben Nummer eingetragen. Bitte prüfe noch einmal nach, ob dort wirklich 2 Schilder mit der selben Nummer stehen.
Baloo Uriza (2019-07-27 02:31:18+00:00): Is it no longer 5th Street and Bank R??
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72671314
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:33:36+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Aleksa M (2019-07-27 09:43:57+00:00): Mislim da ne treba da se taguju ukrštanja puteva i tramvajskih šina kao pružni prelazi, zato što to nisu stvarno pružni prelazi kao preko železničkih šina. Ako treba da se označi da ulica ima tramvajske šine, to se radi pomoću taga embedded_rails=tram.
Aleksa M (2019-07-27 09:45:05+00:00): Inače to nije ni praksa u Beogradu, iako ćeš to videti u mnogim gradovima.
Branko Kokanovic (2019-07-28 10:44:19+00:00): da, u pravu si. Gledao sam nesto osmose greske i naisao da fali prelaz preko sina. To me je navelo da upisem level crossing, a zapravo je falio samo obican node (a posto su se ukrstale sine i ulica, onda je osmose predlozio da treba crossing). Izbrisao sam sve crossinge, ostavio sam node-ove
Aleksa M (2019-07-28 11:02:55+00:00): Odlično! Da, da, svakako treba da se ukrštaju šine i putevi, ne mogu samo da prelaze.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:34:07+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Baloo Uriza (2019-07-27 02:23:15+00:00): Wow, I hate to poop on this one since you did add a lot of detail, but you mashed together a lot of segments that were lane-tagged pretty specifically.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72671752
hesdrib (2019-07-27 08:42:40+00:00): attention !
routes déconnectées.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:35:23+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:35:47+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-27 06:39:41+00:00): Hi sean2019, welcome to OSM.

Please use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
aharvey (2019-07-26 10:55:07+00:00): See my comment at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72670000, I didn't actually mean to delete the whole railway=station, just the public_transport=station + train=yes tag, since these stations aren't part of the public transport network, but ARE part of the railway network (so railway=station).
aharvey (2019-07-29 08:48:27+00:00): Would you like me to add these deleted stations back in? or were you still planning on doing so?
Wallip (2019-07-29 11:18:58+00:00): Sorry, I missed your initial comment.
I am still learning a little, and didnt realise you could sub-select the station type.
I am happy to go through and add these details, but thanks for the pointers.
aharvey (2019-07-29 13:48:06+00:00): No worries at all. Certainly the wiki is a good resource for tags https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway=station and then if you're using the default online editor, down you should see "All tags" to edit individual tags.
samuelrussell (2022-12-30 02:39:24+00:00): There's no commentary here about your deletion of existing paths and ways such as 305523587
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:37:27+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:38:24+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:38:38+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:41:38+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:46:33+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Beddhist (2020-02-13 06:48:05+00:00): Hi, you have added a whole lot of rectangles to the map, representing buildings. Only, the outline and orientation of the buildings does not correspond to what exists in reality.

The map should represent what we find in the real world. Would you mind correcting this, please? If you don't want to spend the time required to map the buildings correctly may I suggest you delete them.

Kind regards,
Peter.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:48:34+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
bielebog (2019-07-26 11:40:13+00:00): access=yes ist redundant und braucht nicht gesetzt werden. Nur wenn es spezielle Einschränkungen (nur Kunden, privat) etc. gibt, trägt man das generell ein.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72674570
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-28 05:41:35+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72729808
user_5359 (2019-07-26 16:02:07+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your change set because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
MFlamm (2020-05-13 11:01:01+00:00): Bonjour, 
Pour info, j'ai procédé à plusieurs correctifs sur ce changeset. Quelques erreurs à éviter: 
1) Le tag access=residents n'existe pas. Lorsqu'il y a une restriction "sauf riverains", il convient d'utiliser le tag access=destination.
2) Attention: le tag * = designated ne se rapporte pas du tout à des indications spécifiques qu'on trouve parfois sur des plaquettes associées à des panneaux de signalisation! Il signifie en réalité "a été conçu pour (...)" et permet par exemple d'indiquer qu'une piste cyclable sert aussi de trottoir (highway=cycleway & foot=designated) ou inversement (highway=footway & bicycle=designated). Merci de lire le wiki à ce propos ;-)
3) A mon avis, le tag "oneway=yes" n'est pas utile pour la situation sur cette route (bien qu'il y ait le panneau "sens interdit aux non-riverains"). En effet, le tag "access=destination" va limiter le routage d'itinéraires et le rendu de carte mettra lui aussi en évidence le statut particulier du tronçon de route.
4) Attention au sens de la voie lors de l'ajout de "oneway=yes". Le fléchage dans l'éditeur indique le sens de circulation. 
Mes différents correctifs peuvent être analysés avec la fonction "Affichage > Historique" disponible dans JOSM et qui est très utile pour apprendre la cartographie dans OSM ;-)
Je reste volontiers à disposition pour échanger en cas de doutes (je m'occupe tout particulièrement de maintenir les données pour optimiser le routage d'itinéraires cyclistes).
Cordialement,
Michael
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:51:53+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:52:27+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Warin61 (2019-07-27 06:10:18+00:00): Hi,
Moving node 4032839889 some 62 meters has caused a flight of stairs to cross themselves... 

I have reverted the movement and unlinked the node from the platforms.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:52:50+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:53:13+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
trigpoint (2019-07-26 09:38:22+00:00): Thank you for this addition, it is clearly a new residential area.
However when mapping please consider the existing mapping, in this case landuse, and adjust the residential area to incorporate this new development.
Cheers Phil
shsahit (2019-09-09 13:25:06+00:00): HI trigpoint,

Thank you for your suggestion. I will keep in mind the land-use feature going forward. Let me know in case you have any more suggestions. I would be happy to learn

Regards,
shsahit
bielebog (2019-07-26 12:05:06+00:00): Hmm, bist Du Dir sicher, daß https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/261708827 nicht einfach der östliche Teil von Ükern 30 ist? Im ALKIS sieht das zumindest so aus.
Tractor (2019-07-26 10:38:41+00:00): Tror emergency=yes er brukt for å markere at det er llegevakt. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Norway/Public_Services#Legevakt

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:emergency=yes
larsf (2019-07-26 11:54:27+00:00): Ja, takk. 
I should refrain from imagining that I know how tags are used...
Have changed it back.
Supaplex (2019-08-09 17:25:36+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
freebeer (2019-07-28 09:00:59+00:00): hello again, amazon team.

here you have added a service drive https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707590092 in the form of a knot or necktie, two days ago, about a week after  i reported this common error.

the other part of the drive is correctly disconnected.

i just thought i would mention this before repairing, so you will need maybe the osm deep history inspector to learn how it was originally uploaded.

thanks

wait, this is a newer iD version, but it does not show the self-intersection in the listing above...

i am horribly confused.
gseethar (2019-08-02 11:47:41+00:00): Hi Freebeer,

Thanks for the catch. I had a chat with the editor to be more careful and avoid such edits. Thanks for your support.

Regards,
Ganesh
bielebog (2019-07-26 11:54:09+00:00): Hmm, hier ist die Treppe gemeint. Die Stufen sind IIRC nicht aus Pflaster, sondern Beton, oder?
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:57:19+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:57:48+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Kovoschiz (2019-07-26 12:28:14+00:00): I followed up on the west end https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72684816
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:58:28+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
OPerivar (2019-07-29 16:06:06+00:00): moin, 
wie kommst du zu dem Straßennamen und den in der Adresse?
DaveF (2019-07-27 23:46:15+00:00): Clearly not a building!
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:58:49+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:58:58+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Reza_koulivand (2019-07-26 09:50:48+00:00): چرا حذف میکنید؟لطف اگر میشه  دلیل حذف رو بگید؟ اگر دلیلت موجه هست منم کمکت حذف کنم؟
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 06:59:39+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
bielebog (2019-07-26 11:53:05+00:00): access=yes ist eigentlich redundant
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:00:56+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:01:07+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:01:19+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:01:29+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
Joseph E (2019-09-02 05:05:09+00:00): gibranhalil,
In this changeset you added an aerodrome node with name "Unnamed Bime Valley1" - please put this information in "note=" rather than as the name; the name should be the local, Indonesian name for the airport.

Also, this aerodrome was already mapped as an area: way 514947915 (See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514947915/history) 

Be careful not to duplicate data when you add new airport nodes.

- Joseph Eisenberg
Reza_koulivand (2019-07-26 10:09:18+00:00): چرا حذف می کنید؟

Why do you delete
berndw (2019-07-29 07:27:47+00:00): Bitte verwende aussagekräftige Kommentare, das von dir verwendete Programm JOSM hat dich bestimmt auch darauf hingewiesen

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Bernd
Stadt Troisdorf_cw (2019-07-29 08:07:00+00:00): Da haben Sie natürlich recht. Ab jetzt werde ich meine Änderungen mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versehen.
Grüße
Reza_koulivand (2019-07-26 10:07:09+00:00): چرا حذف می کنید؟؟؟
user_3022894 (2019-10-15 19:33:29+00:00): Hallo stadt-wuppertal_TR,
ich wollte nur Bescheid geben, dass ich mir erlaube, von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/298572267 das service=driveway wieder zu entfernen. service=driveway steht ür private Zufahrten einzelner Grundstücke oder mehrerer Garagen. Der Zufahrtsweg ist zwar sehr schmal, aber seitdem die Häuser Kaiserstraße 147 - 149a neu gebaut wurden, führt er definitv zu mehreren Grundstücken, und es steht auch nicht "Zutritt verboten" o. Ä. dran, d. h. das Anfangsstück des Weges ist öffentlich. Daher für mich ein normaler highway=service ohne Zusätze. Viele Grüße, Lukas
user_8655426 (2019-07-26 11:37:42+00:00): こんばんは。
トレースの際に Maxer を背景画像にしていますが、浜松市は Bing 以上のずれがあります。
そのため、このセットで変更された道路は、一車線分西側へずれてしまっています。

古くからある地物は国土地理院のものを使い、新しくできた建物などは Maxer を、背景設定の「背景位置の調整」をしてトレースするのがよいです。Maxer は少し斜めから撮影されていますので、注意してください。

https://learnosm.org/ja/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/jp/mapping-common-features/#%E5%BB%BA%E7%89%A9

それと、別のセットの編集についてですが、建物の直角化を忘れてるに。作成したエリアを右クリックしてから「直角化」を選択、あるいはショートカット"Q"を押してみてください。
すべての角が直角なら、建物だけでなく駐車場や農地、運動場などにも使えます。バシッと直角化がキマれば、ど気持ちいいです。ぜひ、お試しください。
eggie (2019-07-26 11:02:48+00:00): Moeilijk te zien wat je precies hebt gedaan. 
Het commentaar bij je changeset gaat ergens anders over. Je hebt een turnrestrictie toegevoegd denk ik?. Geldt dat alleen voor autoverkeer. Je mag dus van de Europalaan niet linksaf naar de Eindhovense weg?
Gr eggie
eggie (2019-07-26 11:22:04+00:00): turn restrictie lijkt me oke.. Ik heb nog wel bicycle=no toegevoegd aan de Europalaan. 
Gr eggie
gorn (2019-11-07 14:27:29+00:00): Hi Peter, this change might be a confusion. There might be a green way from Tisá to Ostrov, but From Ostrov to Decin the trail probably remains red. I WILL change it back to red, but please let me know if you have any survey contradicting this. The Ostrov - Decin part is also segment of E3 and it is unlikely that it changed to red. Also there is another green trail branching from  guidepost "Pod konskou hlavou" and it is highely unlikely, that two greens would be introduced in such way.
Peter Maiwald (2019-11-16 13:40:17+00:00): I hiked from Tisa (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3371069345) to Turistická chata Tisá (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3371069345). There, all the red stripes were painted over with green stripes.
zorglubu (2019-08-05 13:36:34+00:00): Bonjour, merci de noter que les restrictions doivent toujours être sur des relations.
Cordialement.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Relation:restriction
Julien Wajsberg (2019-08-05 13:57:52+00:00): Ah merci pour l'information ! Je l'avais bien vu mais vu que l'éditeur iD me permettait de les mettre (et même me proposait l'interface pour), je me disais qu'il allait ajouter cette relation lui-même.
zorglubu (2019-08-06 14:15:40+00:00): Il peut ajouter cette relation :
- il faut cliquer sur un nœud intersection ;
- puis ouvrir la rubrique "tous les champs"
Il y a une aide en ligne disponible (un "?" je crois).
Bon courage !    :-)
Julien Wajsberg (2019-08-06 14:24:14+00:00): ah il me semble que c'est ce que j'ai fait... mais peut-être pas :/
Bref, merci, je vais regarder de plus près
zorglubu (2019-08-06 14:32:42+00:00): Ah, j'ai juste corrigé ce nœud hier :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/298182248/history
en y mettant la relation.
Le reste était peut-être bon.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:01:59+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32