piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2022-08-20 01:56:48+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM! 

The OSM structure is 'key'='value'. 

A 'key' is always in lower case, such as 'name=', 'building='. 

The 'value' should also be lower case ... except for specific keys like 'name='. So the "club=Sport" and "sport=Fishing" are incorrect. The OSM wiki is quit helpfull to find stuff 

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sport .. that suggest sport=fishing could be leisure=fishing... but then club=sport is not on .. so club=fishing? Oh that is documented on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:club#Recreation 

I see you have found that the key 'club' dose not render. Unfortunate. My work around (and this is 'tagging for the render, which is frowned upon, but needs must) is to put the information on the building... 

I have left it as you have it .. but consider changing it to match OSM tagging.
gpserror (2022-08-15 04:24:06+00:00): Hi, something looks very weird with the two 'reverts' you did... if you look at the history of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/585383651 it looks like you ended up deleting a bad tag change or something?  Not sure exactly of the intent but something seems wrong here
SherbetS (2022-08-16 03:55:19+00:00): The data in this import is below the quality I would consider useful for openstreetmap. I reverted the eddit offhand in JOSM last night and set all conflicts to others versions 

Can you explain what you are seeing that is problematic?
gpserror (2022-08-16 04:32:34+00:00): It looks like version 1, h4ck3rm1k3 did the initial POI 12 years ago.  Then in version 2, h4ck3rm1ke touched it again and changed man_made=mine.

Then in version 3 you added land_use=quarry, which is probably not correct.  But then in version 4, you deleted the POI.

I would expect the POI restored to h4ck3rm1k3's version 2?  

I don't know what the extent of this is, but this seems a bit worrisome.
SherbetS (2022-08-16 04:40:48+00:00): Okay. I reverted the second changeset the user made to avoid excessive conflicts
The I reverted the first changeset.

Hope that explains it
gpserror (2022-08-16 06:59:17+00:00): Hmm... so that 12 year old data was incorrect perhaps?  Now I really don't understand what's going on here.
SherbetS (2022-08-16 11:56:40+00:00): Yes. I was analyzing a sample of this data to assess the quality as a part of another import im working on.

This user imported all this data without reviewing any of it using a bad tagging scheme. Since they data was already of very low quality I decided it would be better to revert the change.

It looks like JOSM missed the north half of the changeset somehow, but at least I caught at least some of the bad data
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-29 04:49:30+00:00): Hello,

Hate to bump the thread.  Ran across a bad node that wasn't successfully reverted at the time:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/585366799/history

Found another here as well:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/585365219

## BREAK ##

That data seems more wrong than ever.  Would it be realistic to try reverting the original edit to add it?  Maybe have a check and only revert the ones without check_date=*  ?
dpolovinkin (2026-05-06 15:05:08+00:00): do you have any idea of how bad is your mapping when you do stuff like this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086321492/history

I will delete all those crappy buildings you added and do it correctly
ivanbranco (2022-08-15 15:59:10+00:00): Hi Ching'en,

place=playground is not a valid place value, maybe you wanted to use leisure=playground?
hanchao (2022-08-17 13:07:59+00:00): 这里不是搞demo的地方
user_5359 (2022-08-16 18:22:39+00:00): Hello! Please use building:material instead of building_material. Please inform all the #hotosm-project-13109.
lyjjimmy (2022-08-29 04:05:58+00:00): Hi, I think numerous contributors has advised you that such cosmetic mapping does not help OSM. Your edits likely break routing logics, public transport relations, and will severely affect how others use the data. Mapping in OSM is NOT as decorating road junctions in Cities:Skylines. Please observe agreed conventions for mapping road network to ensure your effort is a positive contribution rather than a burden for another contributor. Thank you.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-15 11:33:42+00:00): Hi! Can you explain why entrance=home;shop is not valid? This is indeed a home entrance with an access for shop customers also. I changed to entrance=main temporarly, but I would like to know why the double specification is not correct here. Thanks! In our local tools and models, we need the distinction between home, shop and main entrances, and entrance=yes is ignored since it does not specify the category of people using the entrance.
opendcc (2022-08-15 14:34:22+00:00): Double values are valid (in prinziple), however a lot of renderers do have issues with semi-colon value separators. Try to avoid them.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-15 14:44:17+00:00): OK. Thanks
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-15 14:46:18+00:00): An issue should be added to the sepcific erroneous rendrers so at least one day they will mainly parse them correctly. It is specified everywhere in the WIKI: don't tag for the renderer. If you have specific renderers for whihc semi-colons are causing error, please tell us and we will add issues to them directly.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-15 14:46:53+00:00): And yes, my typing is really bad today! Sorry!
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-15 08:30:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124914017 where the changeset comment is: revert Jimboboy vandalism, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6241
user_9434724 (2022-08-15 06:03:08+00:00): Please stop. You are vandalising the map and will be blocked if you continue.
ChristopherGS (2022-08-15 18:07:20+00:00): hello! Thank for your contributions. when adding building footprints, consider squaring the edges. most buildings have square corners, and our data should reflect that. I notice you are using iD, you can square a building, node, or way by clicking it and 1) pressing Q or 2) right click and choose "square"
gscholz (2022-08-16 05:43:15+00:00): Hi praeteritum,
this changeset has again created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-86.09124&lat=12.85147&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

What about fixing those errors first before you upload the reverted changeset?

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
praeteritum (2022-10-31 06:43:06+00:00): Hello Guido,

I'm so sorry for these inconveniences I have caused in the process of reverting all the mess created by joserrg12.

Sadly the revert process is somewhat automated and it just brings the elements to previous state prior the changeset that is being reverted.

For me there is not way to predict what drawback will be after that. Using JOSM for this process is not an option as it would slow the whole task.

What I can do is later once the reverts are applied, I will devote time to fix all the inherited issues from these reverts shown under the OSMOSE profile of this account and the GeoFabrik's reports.

Regards,
praeteritum
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-11-11 00:01:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/468736262
praeteritum (2022-11-12 23:08:43+00:00): To: erickdeoliveiraleal,

The changes are self-explanatory. Nothing has been destroyed.

"Revert changeset 59727690 created by joserrg12"

If there is something that needs to be addressed is the revert of all the changes and "contributions" made by joserrg12.

He should be banned for life for all the imports of copyrighted information he has imported to the OSM database.
AndersAndersson (2022-08-15 20:09:14+00:00): Gäller det även norra delen? En liten snutt återstår utan foot-taggen.
jetthe (2022-08-16 05:26:45+00:00): Tack! Missade den lilla snutten när jag editerade i mobilen. Troligtvis ska den delen vara highway=track då den agerar tillfartsväg till gård såväl som cykelväg. Men både den delen och resten av cykelvägen saknar helt skyltar om jag minns rätt. Nåväl, lade till foot=yes tillsvidare i #124952961. Får springa dit och kolla igen vid tillfälle.
TrickyFoxy (2022-08-15 21:00:08+00:00): 👋 Пожалуйста, остановитесь.

1. Вы рисуете дороги поверх существующих. Вы можете менять теги, добавлять имена у уже существующих. Если нужно, можете разрезать дорогу в нужной точке
2. Если вы действительно заинтересованы в улучшении карты и хотите научиться этому заходите в чат https://t.me/ruosm Там вам смогут объяснить и помочь
3. Если же вы будете игнорировать комментарии участников, то очень вероятно DWG вас заблокирует
Демидовский район (2022-08-16 06:33:31+00:00): Добрый день. Подскажите как нам удалить дороги?
mavl (2022-08-16 13:20:36+00:00): Здравствуйте, Демидовский район.   
  
Вы добавляете очень необычные названия дорог. Также новые дороги не нужно добавлять на уже существующие дороги.

Вам не нужно ничего делать. Можно вернуть карту в первоначальное состояние (и она будет возращена в это состояние). Пожалуйста, почитайте статьи:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
gscholz (2022-08-16 05:43:12+00:00): Hi praeteritum,
this changeset has again created several errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-86.09124&lat=12.85147&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

What about fixing those errors first before you upload the reverted changeset?

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
*abq* (2022-08-15 17:12:19+00:00): Hi tontonfabrice,
you may put "Club Vosgien" in the tag "operator" instead of deleting it. We do the same in the Black Forest, there operator=Schwarzwaldverein. This emphasizes that it is an official signpost by a local organization.
Merci,
Reiner
tontonfabrice (2022-08-16 14:22:41+00:00): OK Merci
jbelien (2022-09-01 07:28:45+00:00): Hello Jhowie_Nitnek,
I see you changed the etymology.
Are you sure about this change ? Where did you find that information ?
In Dutch, it could make sense but not in French : the street is called "Avenue Victoria", not "Avenue Victoire".
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 14:12:11+00:00): I based it on streets that are nearby (dianalaan and floralaan) both roman gods
jbelien (2023-01-22 15:24:16+00:00): Yes, that's exactly my point!
The other streets are called "Avenue de Diane" and "Avenue de Flore" ; "Avenue Victoria" is NOT called "Avenue de Victoire".
Please revert the etymology to Queen Victoria.
JhowieNitnek (2023-01-22 15:28:58+00:00): Done
jbelien (2023-01-22 15:32:17+00:00): Thanks a lot!
hanchao (2022-08-17 13:02:24+00:00): 不要删除实际存在的道路
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124911630
Kogacarlo (2022-08-30 10:20:06+00:00): Klaas, in meine Informationen ist diese Leitung https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92356637#map=14/51.3982/6.2557 nicht 110 kV sondern 30 kV. Es sitzen auch sehr viele Vögel auf den Leitungen. Für ein Foto guckst du hier: https://www.circuitsonline.net/forum/view/159261
Ist da irgendwo noch ein Umspannwerk? Carlo
_klaas_ (2022-08-31 06:31:59+00:00): Hallo Carlo, ich habe das Tagging für die Betriebsspannung nicht verändert, habe mich allerdings auch gewundert, dass dort 110kV getaggt worden sind. Das kleine Umspannwerk am Ende der Leitung und die Herausführung der Leitung nahe der Autobahn sehen ja schon sehr nach Mittelspannung aus. Wenn du sicher bist, dass dort 30 kV anliegen, dann ändere ich es gerne. Dann müsste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92356679#map=15/51.4259/6.2823 auch entsprechend angepasst werden. Dann liegen dort 110 kV und 30 kV an. Viele Grüße Klaas
Kogacarlo (2022-08-31 20:58:30+00:00): Hallo Klaas, sicher bin ich nicht. Ich kann mal kucken ob irgendwo ein Aufkleber ist wo drauf steht 30 kV. Gr C
Kogacarlo (2022-09-02 11:13:06+00:00): Hallo, ich habe Foto's gemacht und SWK Netze GmbH angerufen und die Spannung ist 25 kV. Ich habe dementsprechend die Leitungen geändert. Nur beim Operator bin ich mir nicht sicher.
_klaas_ (2022-09-02 13:58:17+00:00): Hallo Carlo, ich habe die Spannungswerte bei den Ansvhlüssen und dem kleinen Umspannwerk nahe der Pumpstation entsprechend angepasst. Danke für deine Bemühungen.
Viele Grüße, Klaas
Kogacarlo (2022-09-02 18:58:03+00:00): Klaas, ich war in Straelen und habe sämtliche Sachen mir angekuckt. Und habe noch einiges geändert. Schönen Gruss. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125707666
SekeRob (2022-08-15 08:05:34+00:00): Thank for clearing. Normally I rely on the OSMI summary that Pascal Neis generates of daily issues I've left behind. Unfortunately the report has been broken since 2 weeks, so I use the Inspector map to look around, but I hardly do in my own back garden :O))). Yesterday fixed a large forest up north no longer rendering, version 354 or so, and nobody notices it disappeared from the 1km and greater zoom.

Happy Ferragosto (oh wait, German interface, it's the national holiday of national holidays here in Italy.)

ciao
gscholz (2022-08-15 08:36:12+00:00): Hi SekeRob,
thanks for your kind comment. I took this opportunity to send you a private message to help me with the overlapping ways issues the Italian map shows in general.
Guido
SekeRob (2022-08-15 11:33:05+00:00): Tell me abour it, someone mapped a whole string of pedestrian ways on top of track, another mtb track top of roads. A historic hike route mapped as track on top of roads and ways. I try to clean them up when Osmose tags me as, "mistake you touched this object, may not be your fault, but this item has a preblem xyz to fix"

Ill look at your PM, now basking under trrees after an 800slm change in elevation 🤗
Ropino (2022-08-15 09:13:00+00:00): Hi,
please use the correct values: highway:residential (not 'residental') + connect highway with highway, not with a boundary,
example: (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9953979134)
thx in advance
eggie (2022-08-15 07:48:27+00:00): Oke.. no building...
It's oaky according the wiki to map a hotel this way.

Draw an area for the campus of the hotel, comprising buildings and outdoor areas. Apply tourism=hotel.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dhotel

Greetz,
eggie
user4816003805 (2022-08-16 06:40:38+00:00): Hi CurlingMan13,

Thanks for fixing my note (https://osm.org/note/3314598)!
Just FYI, an anonymous user commented in https://osm.org/note/3314907, I think complaining about leaving the "amenity=restaurant" tag.

Generally to mark a restaurant as vacant (at least in SF) we use the "disused:" prefix (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:disused:amenity) instead of adding "vacant=yes". Unfortunately, many renderers are naïve and will see the "amenity=restaurant" without even looking at "vacant" and assume a restaurant is there. Other data consumers like StreetComplete also understand tags like "disused:shop=yes" and can ask mappers later on if shops are still vacant.

I've already gone ahead and changed this in https://osm.org/changeset/124954745.

Anyway, thanks again for fixing my note (and all the other notes you've fixed in SF)!
CurlingMan13 (2022-08-16 06:53:57+00:00): Ugh, so close.  I thought it was vacant, but yeah, should be disused.  You are correct, I agree with you.

Thanks for catching my error, explaining and correcting.

No problem!  I try to tackle the latest notes, killing off the easy ones or spam ones, then addressing easy ones and then going through to get the other ones in that area.

Soon, we shall have a lot less open notes.  And by soon, I mean years, and by less I mean, maybe 3k less. Lol.
user4816003805 (2022-08-18 03:53:54+00:00): Haha. Keep up the good fight!
azakh-world (2022-08-15 09:21:58+00:00): Добрый день!
Если добавляете в ж/д маршруты точки остановок stop_position, пожалуйста, добавляйте их также в отношения stop_area, как тут https://osm.org/relation/8119270 На московском метрополитене такие отношения в основном уже созданы
Эта страница валидации поможет увидеть появившиеся проблемы
https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/russia.html

С уважением,
Алексей
RaphaelPasloin (2022-08-15 11:23:41+00:00): Just check this morning all the street until the crossing of rue des commerçants is cyclestreet.
bxl-forever (2022-08-15 16:41:20+00:00): Thanks for having surveyed other parts of this street.

Just one thing again: commenting another mapper’s changeset flags the changeset as being wrong.  Only do this if there are mistakes.  There are no mistakes in this changeset. ;-)
Hufkratzer (2022-08-15 11:41:03+00:00): Hi, you have removed the building tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366750308/history and replaced it with leisure=horse_riding. This object looks like a building in the aerial view, therefore I assume it was not intended to remove the building tag. The horse_riding tag is for the whole area of the ranch, not just for one building, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1066610101
pabi12 (2022-08-16 12:53:23+00:00): Noted with thanks!!
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-15 07:23:22+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset .
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-15 08:30:03+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124907737, 124907739, 124907799, 124907945, 124908074, 124908426, 124909494, 124909923, 124910139.
kschke (2023-06-26 14:38:25+00:00): зачем у кучи зданий удалили тег building? полгорода теперь на карте не видно
Mannivu (2022-09-22 10:45:18+00:00): Sì, vero, la posta ciclabile era sovrapposta, ma era più corretto spostarla dalla strada, invece che eliminarla del tutto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124914540
Murcik (2022-11-04 21:39:50+00:00): Официальное название Кондакова.
А народные названия не надо в name
Anton Valodzin (2023-05-15 12:58:42+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо за уточнения и простите, что пропустил ваш комментарий
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124914576
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-15 17:43:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124939017 where the changeset comment is: Reverting spam
snoozingnewt (2022-08-15 16:04:36+00:00): you're not outsmarting anyone
nevw (2022-08-15 08:35:01+00:00): Hi
Please don’t add names in this manner.
See the “name is for name only” section of this page
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
The description is unnecessary and the way to tag bicycle use is ok, is to add the tag bicycle=yes
txemt (2022-08-17 00:25:18+00:00): I am revamping this entire neighborhood. I was just in there tonight and took lots of notes on this neighborhood baaed on a customer complaint that I had. The street names are wrong, on a lot of these sections.
pmarkina_lyft (2022-08-17 08:46:20+00:00): My name is Polina and I am a mapper in the OSM team at Lyft. In this changeset I only fixed the geometry and added an access tag. Unfortunately, I didn't have any evidence to check and correct street names in the area, so I didn’t work with them.
Thank you for correcting street names based on your own data.
Best regards, Polina
txemt (2022-08-17 13:02:24+00:00): The county property appraiser has all of the correct street names and alignment as well.
pmarkina_lyft (2022-08-17 15:10:11+00:00): Hi txemt, 
The Lyft Mapping team usually works on very specific OSM aspects, so our edits often cover only a limited group of tags within specific projects we run. We normally don’t do bulk updates in the area because of that. In the mentioned case, we were focused on geometry changes only. At the same time, it is our policy to be careful with available resources, so we use a short list of them. Unfortunately, using the county property appraiser has not been on our radar so far, but we do appreciate your suggestion.   
Thank you for your time and effort!

Best regards, Polina
nevw (2022-08-15 08:36:21+00:00): Hi
Why has this cycleway tagged access=no?
SovereignTheVoluntarist (2022-08-21 05:30:55+00:00): Newbie mistake :)
Dawid2849 (2022-08-15 11:11:36+00:00): Jeszcze przydałoby się przedłużyć relację :P
AndyB_66 (2022-08-15 11:22:43+00:00): Mówisz - masz :)
Dawid2849 (2023-01-21 19:54:32+00:00): Dzięki za przedłużenie, jednak 4 miesiące temu Twoja zmiana została cofnięta. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126407289
Dawid2849 (2023-01-21 19:55:45+00:00): Zjeżdżałem też na chwilę z S19 do Kraśnika właśnie na węźle Kraśnik Północ i nie było tam znaków DW842. Przy Pułankowicach była żółta ramka bez numeru.
Dawid2849 (2023-01-21 19:56:46+00:00): Mówię tu o drogowskazie na rondzie węzła Kraśnik Północ, nie wiem jak jest dalej, bo ja pojechałem w kierunku centrum Kraśnika, nie w kierunku Wilkołazu.
Dawid2849 (2023-01-31 17:00:52+00:00): https://edziennik.gddkia.gov.pl/DU_GDDKIA/2023/4/akt.pdf wg Tego dokumentu DW842 kończy się w Rudniku
nevw (2022-08-15 08:41:20+00:00): It is incorrect to change Light Road from a residential street to a cycleway.
There is a tagging scheme to indicate if cycle lanes are on the road (do a google search of osm wiki)
If the road is part of a cycle route, you just need to add that particular section to the cycle route relation.
nevw (2022-08-21 09:40:00+00:00): This shows ok in Tor browser now.
Also you can try deleting the cache on your pc (ontrol+r on a Mac). 
I notice that the CyclOSM layer updates quite soon.
nevw (2022-08-15 08:45:17+00:00): I see why you are adding access=no now.
You are referring to no access for cars I expect. This is not necessary because that is the default assumption for cycleways anyway, so not necessary to add that tag in this case.
nevw (2022-08-15 08:46:46+00:00): All my comments should not discourage you from mapping. I am just offering guidance 🙂
SovereignTheVoluntarist (2022-08-21 07:29:50+00:00): No worries :)   Also, how long does it take for these changes to show on OSMand?  I'm using the OSMand app on my phone, but it doesn't seem to show the changes yet ?
nevw (2022-08-21 09:32:17+00:00): I don't know about OSMAnd and it may depend on if your using the paid version.
A good way to see the latest is to use the Tor browser as it is less likely to be caching the old imagery than other browsers and if it is out of date you can use a new Tor circuit for the site.
On my phone I use the Onion Browser https://onionbrowser.com/
Brouter web seems to update routing quite soon https://brouter.de/
highflyer74 (2022-08-18 10:41:26+00:00): Hello!

Just a quick hint: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:summit:cross%3Dyes is used with ":" inside the key. I have fixed it for you :-)
Giogio83 (2022-08-18 10:49:23+00:00): Hi! Thanks, I know that key, maybe it was a oversight from me, thank you for noticed this to me and fix it. I will take care more careful next time
4004 (2022-08-20 19:41:27+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
название тут все же одно, Флория
Hufkratzer (2022-08-15 10:41:37+00:00): Hi, I think https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1086378526 looks like a riding arena (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena) in the aerial view, but you have tagged it with leisure=horse_riding, which is for complete riding centres (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding). I wonder why you did that because some months ago you have already tagged some riding arenas correctly, e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056273503
Lachgast (2022-08-15 10:56:44+00:00): Hi Hufkratzer,

Thanks for sharing the information. I didn't know about this semantic difference between the two. I'll try to apply this key appropriately from now on.

Great that you're helping. 

Happy mapping!
Lachgast