piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
serock (2018-09-26 03:36:49+00:00): Hola Agus, una consulta sobre la modificacion del POI Ex Centro clandestino de detención El Vesubio, en el cual le quitas "historic=monument", pero alli hay un monumento, te paso los links
http://lidernoticias.com.ar/veronica-magario-inauguro-un-monumento-en-el-ex-ccd-el-vesubio/
http://ajblamatanza.org.ar/2016/03/acto-en-el-vesubio/
AgusQui (2018-09-26 03:44:20+00:00): Ah ok, es que siempre hubo yuyos en ése lugar, pase hace poco con el bondi y no lo vi, lo voy a corregir. Si hubieras puesto algo como "agrego nuevo monumento" en tu conjunto de cambios hubiera dudado de corregirlo.
freebeer (2018-12-01 22:10:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65083578 where the changeset comment is: OSM is not a paintbox for Pokemon fiction, but a serious mapping project.  Please draw only what exists in real life, else your changes will be reverted as vandalism
freebeer (2018-12-01 22:10:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65083557 where the changeset comment is: OSM is not a paintbox for Pokemon fiction, but a serious mapping project.  Please draw only what exists in real life, else your changes will be reverted as vandalism
Truchin (2018-09-25 21:00:01+00:00): En France, l'info de la ville n'est pas utile puisque le POI s'y trouve. C'était intéressant il y a plusieurs années lorsque les limites communales n'avaient pas été intégrées.

Bonne continuation
viloan (2018-09-24 01:59:00+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
jollybubbly (2018-09-24 02:00:11+00:00): Corrected Parking area, corrected building areas, parking aisle alignments. Changed "Service Roads" to both "Drive-through" and "driveway".
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-09-27 18:27:33+00:00): I am curious - what is the point of tagging pluscode? It is just a different format of specifying longitude and latitude.

And as such always can be computed from location, or turned into more readable location format.
jollybubbly (2018-09-27 19:03:36+00:00): I didn't know that it was a function of Lat/Lon. In that case, there's no point.
Hernan (2018-09-29 14:45:57+00:00): Hola, la clasificacion de pueblos y ciudades en Argentina se rige por esta convencion
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina/L%C3%ADmites_pol%C3%ADtico-administrativos#Estandarizaci.C3.B3n_de_lugares
Saludos
jocarvajal (2019-04-01 14:39:30+00:00): Buenas amigo, venía a preguntar si es posible agregar un platform paralelo al nodo(4628999924) perteneciente a la Estación Atlántico, ya que de esto dependen sistemas de mapeo de rutas de trenes Incofer en el proyecto que está realizando el laboratorio experimental de Alajuela del Tecnológico de Costa Rica. Gracias de antemano.
elotrojames (2019-05-26 15:15:43+00:00): Hola. En este conjunto de cambios se eliminaron 2 paradas del tren y una plataforma que son necesarias según la versión 2 del esquema de mapeo de transporte público. Voy a volver a agregar esos nodos.
HTownQ (2018-09-24 02:56:22+00:00): this is a mistake, will fix on 9/24/2018
HTownQ (2018-09-24 12:32:56+00:00): fixed my road mistake on 9/24/2018
CurlingMan13 (2023-06-08 03:48:42+00:00): The large apartment building should have been added as a landuse, not a large building.  I have corrected it.  :)
brianboru (2018-09-24 15:05:20+00:00): Hi Martin

You've managed to break several relations that I took a long time to edit. If you insist on repeating work and subdividing relations into field parcels at least be courteous enough to leave the existing relation until you're finished. Can you restore my relations please until you're finished? Why repeat work of others when there are loads of white spaces to complete?
Martin Wynne (2018-09-24 15:37:47+00:00): Hi Brian,

Sorry, I didn't know I have broken anything. You marked a vast single area as landuse=farmland which is very difficult to edit in the iD editor, because it can't download all of it at the zoom level at which editing is possible.

You marked as farmland (i.e. cultivated land) for some areas which are in fact meadows, pasture, scrub, plant nurseries, etc. As I know the area, I'm trying to create more accurate mapping. I'm in the middle of doing it, and will ensure it covers the area you originally mapped as farmland before I finish. Probably later today.

cheers,

Martin.
brianboru (2018-09-25 08:03:36+00:00): Good luck with improving the accuracy but be careful with confusing landcover with landuse- what's pasture this year could be arable next year and then scrub when used with set aside subsidy - but it's still all farmland.
Martin Wynne (2018-09-25 10:55:20+00:00): Hi Brian,

From the wiki: "many mappers prefer the more specific tags landuse=meadow for meadows and pastures, landuse=orchard for fruit orchards, and use landuse=farmland for cropland only".

I agree that farm usage can change, but usually it is related to the type of soil. Water meadows liable to flooding and high hillsides are not suitable for arable crops. For set-aside land I tend to use landuse=grassland. Set-aside rules require some maintenance, if it was allowed to become unimproved scrub with small trees and bushes set-aside would not apply.  

The welcome page: https://www.openstreetmap.org/welcome says the mapping should be "real" and current", so the fact that the usage may change after my visit is not relevant. The same applies to any piece of land in town or country.

cheers,

Martin.
LeifRasmussen (2018-09-24 18:52:37+00:00): Yay for #1000!
AkuAnakTimur (2018-09-24 06:13:16+00:00): Hello & welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Is it possible to map playgrounds from leisure=park to leisure=playground?
Myazyk (2018-10-06 19:44:06+00:00): Источник то є джерело, а струмок - то ручей. Прошу визначитись, що саме ти наніс на карту
tekim (2019-11-01 00:10:09+00:00): Hi dvdhns.  Thanks for all of the great edits around RMNP.  Just one comment, the name tag is for the name of the feature only, not other information, such as "off trail" there is a separate tag that indicates if a trail is official or not.
dvdhns (2019-11-07 04:29:05+00:00): Hi thanks for message. Yes there is a tag for off trail routes, however all of the major basemaps used for hiking/outdoors do not utilize it. Because of this the average user does not see any difference between a designated trail and an informal / social trail / unofficial. Often these are much more difficult than the designated route, but are very useful to experienced users. Not knowing the difference can result in a real life-safety situation.

One story:
https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/father-and-daughter-rescued-from-side-of-treacherous-b-c-mountain-1.4000757

A quote from it: “Officials ... said a faulty GPS tracker led the pair to a treacherous spot on ... they could not find a way back.They basically were following a trail from a digital map guide and some of these trails are not properly vetted."  The digital map was OSM. There was nothing faulty about the "GPS tracker", it was just using the OSM map that was showing both regular hiking and technical climbing routes as the same thing.

Discussion of the problem: 
https://www.reddit.com/r/searchandrescue/comments/8wlz88/rescue_due_to_marking_of_trails_on_openstreetmap/

And more discussion:
https://medium.com/@stevejoneshikes/use-caution-with-trail-map-applications-a6467e5907a

This is not a problem with OSM or tagging. It is a problem with how the major basemap providers utilize the OSM tagging and present them to the users. Until this is solved, the simple workaround is to include basic safety information in the name tag so it is presented to the user.
tekim (2019-11-08 00:53:05+00:00): You make some good points, but the rule in OSM is we do not tag for the renderer [0], and we only use the name tag for the name[1]. If we start putting other information in the name tag we will start getting (difficult, experience hikers only, no bikes, dogs not allowed, etc.). You think it is important to indicate that this is "off trail" (which isn't really correct anyway, it is a trail, just not an official trail), others may think that the app they use doesn't properly symbolize these other characteristics, and so will modify the name to suit their needs.  It is up to data consumers to properly symbolize and label features.  I recommend that you open issues with the application  that you use which are not symbolizing this features in a manner you find appropriate.  In the case of open source apps, you can create a pull request. 

[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
aharvey (2019-11-08 02:27:00+00:00): A number of hiking maps do support sac_scale, trail_visibility and route=hiking see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking_Maps.

I agree with tekim that we should refrain from mapping for the render, the name should be the name only.

I use foot=designated to say this is a signposted path for foot traffic (including signposted hiking routes, and "official" routes), and foot=yes for paths that you can walk on, but not signposted or otherwise as specifically for walking ("unofficial" route).
oba510 (2018-09-24 07:36:58+00:00): Since the street is only temporarily closed for construction you could have changed it to highway=construction instead of deleting it outright.
vvrddy (2019-07-11 10:52:03+00:00): Hi oba510, 

Thanks for reviewing the edit and apologies for the delayed response. Its a misake from my end. Shouldn't have deleted the road. Thanks for reverting the changes.  We are always happy to engage with local OSM community.

Regards,
vvrddy
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-10-23 14:26:25+00:00): você traçou umas vias sobre outras aqui, corrigi isso
mavl (2018-11-10 11:56:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64347706, 64349160 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
Lokai (2018-09-24 07:36:56+00:00): Hallo bei OSM,

du hast deine Schulgebäude mit Gebäuden "überbaut". Dem Sinne nach natürlich, schau da bitte mal nach. Bei Fragen bitte die hier stellen.

 Gruß
Lokai (2018-10-01 07:28:32+00:00): Keine Rückmeldung des mappers. Schade
tekkx2k18 (2018-10-01 07:41:02+00:00): Hallo Wegabschneider,
hatte nach deinem Beitrag direkt mal andere Schulen angeschaut und festgestellt dort wird eigentl. nur das gelände als Umriss angegeben und nicht die einzelnen Gebäude, also hatte ich die Gebäude entfernt und nur noch das Schulgelände gelassen. War aber scheinbar auch nicht richtig. Sorry nochmals.
Lokai (2018-10-01 08:03:27+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung. Auch die Gebäude gehören gezeichnet. Sie existieren und werden genutzt, etc.  -> building=school.

Schaut meine Kartierung gut aus. Verbesserungen sind willkommen
tekkx2k18 (2018-10-01 08:47:34+00:00): sollte so passen, wobei ich nicht schlüssig bin ob das angrenzende Plattenbergbad nicht doch zur Schule gehört
radiotrefoil (2021-12-27 08:40:33+00:00): Hi, is this the grave of Robert Longton? Interested if you could confirm the location.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 15:36:02+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2761925287/history has sport=team_handball that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would sport=handball (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dhandball ) be fitting at least equally well?
eggie (2024-02-01 15:48:41+00:00): Hi   That was 5 years ago..  
I merged the info from the buildingshape with the addressnode by assisting a starting mapper. .
yes.. handball  was the sport here... but.... 

Sporthal the Reehorst has permanently closed and wil be sold.
I will remove the Sporthal name and sport.
https://www.edestad.nl/lokaal/lokaal/139010/ede-gaat-sporthal-de-reehorst-verkopen-510591

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2024-02-01 15:51:49+00:00): The club moved to this location https://www.hvreehorst.nl/contact/
Thomas8122 (2018-09-26 16:07:34+00:00): Was hat ein Fußweg mit Zeitzeugen zu tun? Bitte mit footway=sidewalk ergänzen, wenn straßenbegleitend. Danke und Gruß
maraf24 (2018-09-24 19:48:53+00:00): Na pewno 5? Urząd Miejski podaje, że tu jest nr 9, a 5 jest obok: 
http://bialapiska.e-mapa.net?userview=18
DavidKewley (2018-09-26 06:15:35+00:00): Reverted highway turned into business in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62935093
Chris Fleming (2018-09-29 11:00:48+00:00): Do you have any more details for these?
lakedistrict (2018-10-02 21:14:04+00:00): Given the lack of details and that fact that they don't seem to correspond with anything on bing imagery, I think that this changeset can be reverted.
lakedistrict (2018-10-23 20:44:34+00:00): Reverted in 63810814
FrankXF (2018-10-07 22:32:17+00:00): Hallo R23L, highway=busstop ist nur auf Punkten möglich, nicht bei Linien oder Flächen. Bitte wieder korrigieren.
EinKonstanzer2 (2018-10-22 02:50:53+00:00): Ist mir gerade auch aufgefallen (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/166474242), da dieser nicht mehr in Karte angezeigt wird. Bisher ist wohl nichts geschehen...
R23L (2018-10-22 07:20:11+00:00): Okay, das scheint nur auf der Online ein Problem zu sein. Ich ändere die entsprechenden Haltestellen dann wieder zu Wegen.
Swyter (2018-10-03 00:22:53+00:00): @FerGomez Me tomas el pelo o te crees que somos tontos. Todos tus cambios añaden parques para Pokemon Go. :(

Ese no es el problema principal, es que además te has cargado muchas de las características y caminos delineados con mucho cuidado como elefante en una cacharrería. Has movido pasos de cebra, añadido nombres que no son, y puesto áreas con formas terribles.

Esto es no valorar un trabajo de años por culpa de un juego. Llevo editando Benavente desde el principio y no te vamos a dejar que fastidies el plano que usan un montón de usuarios para que puedas hacer trampas o te beneficies de forma artificial en un juego.
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
jtracey (2018-09-27 05:34:01+00:00): The lines you turned to sidewalks aren't sidewalks, they're address interpolations provided by StatCan (i.e., the government) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Using_interpolation

Some of those roads do have sidewalks, but they're not the same as the address lines. In general, the sidewalks and address lines shouldn't match up (for one, sidewalks almost always have to intersect with streets, while addresses almost never will, but more generally they just aren't the same shape/location).

Also, some of the address lines you tagged as sidewalks don't have sidewalks on those roads. If you don't know whether a road has a sidewalk or not, it's best to leave it as is (or do a survey! :) ).
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
Supaplex (2019-02-06 18:23:03+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mueschel (2018-09-25 08:45:18+00:00): Hi,
could you point me to the documentation of all these new education* tags you added here? Without documentation the information can't be used by others.

Thanks, Jan
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
pitscheplatsch (2018-09-24 16:29:30+00:00): Hi deni sabrian, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several buildings which have been mapped just a few days ago? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=62872090
eggie (2018-09-24 11:15:52+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Graag concreet aangeven wat je doet.
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
berndw (2018-09-27 16:47:09+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM

Straßennamen bitte ausschreiben und nicht mit *str. abkürzen.
Und was meinst Du mit  "muß von Niehl nach Köln und Cologne geändert werden"?
Markus W Kropp (2018-09-28 11:51:33+00:00): Man findet eine "Sebastianstr. 71" nicht in Köln, wenn man das bei OSM als Suche eingibt, und zwar folgender Text:"Sebastianstr. 71, Köln". Wenn man eingibt "Sebastianstr. 71, Niehl" findet man die Straße. Anscheinend wurde statt des Städtenamens ein Stadtteil eingegeben/editiert. Nun möchte ich "niehl" in "Köln" korrigieren. Des weiteren ist mir aufgefallen, dass oft "Cologne" und nicht "Köln" als Städtename angegeben wird. Das wird wohl für Deutsche auch ein Suchproblem erzeugen, oder?

Sorry, ich finde das System hier unübersichtlich und würde mich über ein bischen Hilfe freuen, denn ich würde öfters gerne was verbessern, wenn es was zu verbessern gibt.

LG Markus
berndw (2018-09-28 16:04:40+00:00): Hallo Markus

Hilfe sollst Du bekommen ;-)

Die Suche nach Hausnummern auf openstreetmap.org funktioniert nicht immer, keine Ahnung warum.
Die Abkürzung Sebastianstr. macht es möglicherweise nicht besser.

Das Haus Nr. 71 in der *Sebastianstraße* im Kölner Stadtteil Niehl hat alle Eigenschaften für eine erfolgreiche Suche.
Ich weiß aber nicht, inwieweit die Suche auf Straßen in der Nähe dieses Hauses ausdehnt, um die möglichst nächste Position zu finden. 

Ansonsten versuch mal die Suche von openstreetmap.de, da landet der Marker mitten im Haus.

Das der Ortsteil Niehl mit genannt wird, eine Eigenart von OSM

Kannst Du ein Beispiel nennen wo Cologne anstelle von Köln angegeben wird, möglicher ist dort der Schlüssel name nicht korrekt gesetzt.
highflyer74 (2018-09-28 17:00:31+00:00): Hallo Markus! Eigentlich bekommt nur die tatsächliche Straße auch den Namen. Wege, die von ihr abzweigen, haben nicht noch einmal den gleichen Namen (so wie z.B. auch Radwege, die parallel zu einer Straße laufen, nicht noch einmal so heissen wie die Straße). Die Straße ist mit noname=yes getaggt. Das heisst eigentlich, dass da jemand mit Ortskenntnis festgestellt hat, das dieser Weg keinen eigenen Namen hat. Dass die Häuser, die sich dort befinden, zur Sebastianstraße gehören, ist davon unabhängig. Auch ändert das meines Erachtens nichts daran, ob eine Adresse per Nominatim (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Nominatim) gefunden wird. In diesem Fall ist ja, wie berndw schon anmerkte, die Adresse korrekt am Gebäude gemappt. Das ist das einzig wichtige. OSM ist ein recht komplexes Projekt. Dass die Adresse auf osm.org oder osm.de nicht gefunden wird, liegt vermutlich an der verwendeten Suchmaschine (siehe oben). Das heisst nicht, dass die Adresse nicht z.B. in einer App wie OsmAnd o.ä. nicht gefunden wird. Ich schicke Dir noch eine PN mit einigen interessanten Informationen zu OSM. Wenn Du Lust hast, kannst Du Dich gern mal einlesen :-) Viele Grüße!
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
Decyk (2018-09-24 08:58:19+00:00): http://rzeszow.wyborcza.pl/rzeszow/7,34962,23758261,lacznik-ulic-towarnickiego-i-pilsudskiego-prawie-gotowy-kiedy.html
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
aixbrick (2018-09-24 08:50:10+00:00): siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62838123
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]
mavl (2018-10-03 16:04:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63165336 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data.]