piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner-repair (2017-03-06 22:55:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46636565 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of nature reserves in Saxony after discussion with mw67 on IRC because of missing permission (and wrong tagging)
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-03-08 08:18:08+00:00): Przypominam, że samo dodanie numeru to za mało. Taki adres nigdzie się nie pojawi, a nie nie da się wyszukać.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-03-08 08:20:52+00:00): *ani nie da się wyszukać.
Wilcze łapy (2017-03-10 20:35:27+00:00): Poprawię to. ... i te nieszczęsne "nr".
user_3216889 (2017-03-06 12:52:53+00:00): Halte is nu verwijderd uit lijn 5.
Nakaner-repair (2017-03-06 22:55:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46636565 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed import of nature reserves in Saxony after discussion with mw67 on IRC because of missing permission (and wrong tagging)
Commodoortje (2017-03-08 00:03:00+00:00): Vermoedelijk heb je per ongeluk het Koningsplein naar een parkeerplaats omgezet. 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158617867
Hier is te zien wat je hebt gewijzigd:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/f5p705ax755fb8n/2017-03-08_00-59-39.jpg?raw=1
De parkeergarage is gewoon aanwezig in OSM.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4644134887
Inmiddels heb ik deze way hersteld.
4b696d (2017-04-19 08:08:28+00:00): Could you please stop tagging parking positions as taxiways. One of the top rules of OSM to NOT use wrong tags in order to make something show up on a map.
If something does not show up on the map it is because the makers of that map  don't want it to show up. Mapnik does not show parking_positions.
Aleks-Berlin (2017-03-07 08:57:34+00:00): Hi Weltstaat, what means #=yes ? Could you fix this for way/334711024 . Thanks, Alex
Weltstaat (2017-03-07 09:03:48+00:00): oops, a typing error. Thanks for indicating!
Commodoortje (2017-03-08 00:38:42+00:00): Intersectie in tankstation gecorrigeerd.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/9aw1huxhn2875o2/2017-03-08_01-37-04.jpg?raw=1
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/281174303
mavl (2019-06-21 16:17:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-21 16:17:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Commodoortje (2017-03-07 09:52:30+00:00): Waarom zet je extra tags op het water, terwijl dit niet de werkelijkheid is.
water=riverbank
water=lake 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46621374
Chris Fleming (2017-03-06 15:18:53+00:00): Why have you removed the trees that were individually mapped and replaced them with a forest area?
GinaroZ (2017-03-06 12:05:30+00:00): Why are you changing all of these trees into landuse=forest? 
מדוע אתה משנה את כל העצים האלה לתוך landuse = יער?
SomeoneElse (2017-03-07 14:05:41+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-07 14:11:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46653048 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some osmapi-added test data
Myazyk (2017-05-08 23:25:17+00:00): Уточніть місце розташування місцевості Залом та На Ріці у селі Сеченів
CAI Salò (2018-02-15 11:14:28+00:00): Ciao,
per cortesia non assegnare numeri ai sentieri del Parco Alto Garda Bresciano. Stiamo rifacendo tutta la numerazione.
Grazie
demon_box (2018-02-15 14:08:46+00:00): Ok, questo mio changeset è di 1 anno fa ;-)
ciao
CAI Salò (2018-02-15 15:14:18+00:00): Ciao, sì, me ne sono accorto dopo.
Una domanda: è possibile che qualcuno abbia cancellato o che non si sia caricato il lavoro fatto? Ed eventualmente come faccio a recuperarlo?
dudka (2017-04-17 14:26:07+00:00): Щось тут не так в цьому ченджсеті. Для чого лінія https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478838197? Вона майже співпадає з https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478512160
user_630853 (2017-04-17 16:08:51+00:00): Я додавав розмітку дороги, тому прийшлося розбити так як розмітка закінчилася
gileri (2017-03-06 19:53:08+00:00): Le nom du restaurant est-il "Les Bros du Grill" ou "La Broche" ? Les deux tags sont présents.
rriemann (2017-03-06 22:08:44+00:00): Sur le paneau et la vitrine il est écrit "La Broche"
gileri (2017-03-24 17:25:51+00:00): Ok j'ai retiré le tag name:fr="Les Bros du Grill"
nammala (2017-03-07 06:06:49+00:00): Hi angys,

OpenStreetMap (OSM) is the real map of the world. The data we add should be ground truth not the in valid data. The name tag you have added seems inappropriate. I went ahead and deleted the tag. Please make sure to add valid data.
Let me know if you need anything regarding mapping

Regards,
nammala
eggie (2017-03-06 14:33:18+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-06 14:39:29+00:00): Ben je er van bewust dat je een straat hebt gewist van de kaart? Ik heb je edit  teruggedraaid.
eggie (2017-03-06 14:44:01+00:00): Je kunt wel aangeven access=private, (dan routeert de kaart daar niet) maar een straat wissen wordt niet op prijs gesteld.
Bazyx (2017-03-06 14:45:43+00:00): Het is geen straat, daarom heb ik de edit gemaakt. 
Ik woon in dit blok en het is eigen terrein. Er is bestrating maar die is alleen voor parkerende bewoners bestemd. We hebben te veel last van sluipverkeer, en dit leidt soms tot gevaarlijke situaties vanwege spelende kleine kinderen. Vandaar dat dit ook niet als straat in OSM zou moeten verschijnen.
Bazyx (2017-03-06 14:52:03+00:00): Ik heb het nu maar op access=no gezet, want dat is feitelijk de situatie. Nog wel jammer dat het nu als straat wordt weergegeven, want dat zal al voor verwarring zorgen.
Bazyx (2017-03-06 14:58:22+00:00): En heb er nu een pad van gemaakt ipv een woonerf, dat is ook correcter.
eggie (2017-03-06 15:30:03+00:00): nu highway=service... lijkt me correct. Routeren doet het in ieder geval niet. 
access=private is genoeg om het niet te laten routeren overigens. Je pakt het in ieder geval serieus aan. :)
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-03-08 08:15:06+00:00): W przypadku numerów, które są przypisane do miejscowości, a nie do ulicy, stosujemy addr:place= zamiast addr:city=
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Commodoortje (2017-03-07 09:48:26+00:00): Gebruik geen tag name om een kenmerk te beschrijven !
Overweeg om de naam te verwijderen op deze bomen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice#Gebruik_geen_tag_name_om_een_kenmerk_te_beschrijven_.21
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
Commodoortje (2017-03-07 09:31:30+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
Commodoortje (2017-03-07 09:42:13+00:00): Dit is een nuttige edit, toch heb ik je invalide parkeerplaats gewijzigd.
Tevens heb ik het meer vierkant gemaakt.
Hier kun je zien wat er gewijzigd is.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=46646294
Invalide parkeerplaatsen zijn nuttig voor OSM, de andere losse parkeerplaatsen zijn niet verstandig om te mappen. Later zul je begrijpen waarom.
tyr_asd (2018-04-07 09:13:39+00:00): Wurde der Knoten https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4335478776 hier versehentlich verschoben? Oder verläuft der Tunnel hier wirklich so "eckig"? Siehe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1346829
SWF8 (2018-04-09 07:38:11+00:00): Der Anfang stimmt (siehe Richtung der Sannabrücke) - über den restlichen Verlauf gibt es noch keine brauchbaren Daten
westnordost (2017-03-12 13:00:59+00:00): Wow, such detailed, diligent and high-quality work (this and other changesets). Congrats :-)

I am (the guy who is) adding landuses in the Yangon area, feel free to correct me as I am only doing satellite mapping
ralyanov (2017-03-06 13:47:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46624323
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-02-08 11:32:45+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3549933 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-13 19:55:03+00:00): Are there any remains of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/478853944 on the ground? 

If yes, what kind of traces?

And other nearby mapped razed tracks?
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
eggie (2017-03-06 14:59:43+00:00): Dit kan wel. Als er geen bord woonerf staat zou je er beter highway=service van kunnen maken. Dat heeft een lagere prioriteit.
access=no gebruik je als er het witte bord met de rode rand staat. access=private als het eigen terrein is.
eggie (2017-03-06 15:08:53+00:00): Als er auto's rijden op het eigen terrein zou ik het veranderen in highway = service.
Bazyx (2017-03-06 15:12:09+00:00): Ja highway = service is voor nu het beste dan.
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-06 16:33:51+00:00): Chrm. You're updating not 10-20, but hundreds objects and I have to spend too much time fixing it. It is not nice, that you're knowingly introducing a lot of errors. Please fix your automated script if you want to do more automated updates. The rule is very simple: if area is in Lithuania and name:lt does not exist, add name:lt with value equal to name value. Thank you.
wmyrda (2017-03-06 17:42:02+00:00): Whatever. They are not automated but done by hand from the source http://polski.mapywig.org/news.php I do not have the lithuanian names there and I do not know whether names in name tag are lihuanian therefore I would not add any tags with name:lt
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-06 18:00:40+00:00): In Lithuania ALL values in name tag are Lithuanian. So if the point you're changing is in Lithuania, name tag HAS Lithuanian value.
Let's not get into situation where I would think of doing reverts rather than spending hours fixing name tag errors done on purpose.
Do it RIGHT or don't do it at all.
wmyrda (2017-03-06 18:21:00+00:00): I am doing what I can to help OSM community and I do add proper values there. You by threatening  to delete others work (my in this case) go against OSM spirit as my entries are not wrong. Maybe they are not sufficient, but OSM community has 3537047 members at the moment and I am sure in time some one would also add all name:lt values. I concentrate on name:pl tag.
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-06 18:29:30+00:00): OSM spirit says that you must consult and take into account the local mapping rules. Local mapping rules in Lithuania is to do QUALITY work, not anything anyway someway anyhow. You KNOW the rules, you know what you must do, it is not hard to do that, and yet you say you will do it in incorrect way. How do you expect such behaviour to be valued?
rmikke (2017-03-06 22:35:25+00:00): @Tomas Straubis If there is such a rule in Lithuania, then this is the job for a bot to enforce it. Just add name:lt if there is such a rule. You cannot expect outside mappers to stick to your local rules - if they don't go against them (e.g. removing name:lt tags), they are doing right. Did wmyrda emove name:lt or change local official name to some wrong value? If not, than I don't understand your problem.
rmikke (2017-03-06 22:45:02+00:00): @Tomas Straupis:
"Let's not get into situation where I would think of doing reverts rather than spending hours fixing name tag errors done on purpose."

This is essentially blackmailing a user doing a good job, that you will destroy his work if he doesn't do additional job he has no knowledge to do, to satisfy some QA bot.
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-07 02:42:39+00:00): @rmikke:
I cannot expect outside mappers to know it in the beginning. And that is why I have already fixed hundreds of such errors in the past (sometimes they came together with adding some old incorrect population or other incorrect data etc., I had to revert such additional bad changes, bot would not have been able to do that without removing name:pl tags). But it was taking too much time, so after I told/explained it NUMEROUS times to the user doing the changes, I expect that such a simple rule is respected. It is not a rocket science to add ONE tag when adding another. As the change is very simple, I count ignoring it as total disrespect of Lithuanian mappers work on keeping the data clean, predictable and usable.
And it is not blackmailing, it is showing that rude ignorance of now KNOWN local rules is far from "doing a good job". If somebody keeps their house clean, it is not polite for the outsider to walk inside with dirty boots and tell "just buy the cleaning service".
wmyrda (2017-03-07 06:15:57+00:00): wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names does not say anything about doing anything differently in Lithuania. I am not using bots but I am doing manual work from old and very hard to read maps from website above eg. http://igrek.amzp.pl/details.php?id=3944 Spending half a day figuring out which name goes where is hard enough to concentrate on it and add polish names there.
OSM first of all is based on volunteer work, remember that. I do not have knowledge or that much time to do everything and I concentrate on stuff that interests me to have the most in the OSM and would also add name:be, name:ru, name:de or any other name if I had knowledge AND TIME to do that. 
Local rules for tagging mean one should not map differently than local community tags. I did not do so, just did not satisfy whole specification which does not interest me. Your threats to remove my time consuming work work (even worse done automatically with bots) goes totally against everything community stands for.

I hope this would not get to this, but If you do remove any of this work please expect that I will write a letter to DGW about this to say the least crazy and bizarre approach of yours.
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-07 07:05:39+00:00): 1. You're doing work which belongs to OpenHistoricalMap, not OpenStreetMap. This explains why some of the name:pl tags you add are incorrect: they have nothing in common with official name, neither phonetically, nor by the meaning. While I'm not interested in name:pl tags, expect those to be fixed by other mappers.
2. Administration division changes, you cannot map (connect) every historical village/town to village/town existing today. Places get abandoned, merged and renamed because of different reasons including vote of people living in the village.
3. If you think that your hard work is for some reason more valuable/important than my hard work, then please contact DWG BEFORE doing any changes and requiring any fixes. Lets get third party opinion about 1) adding OHM data to OSM 2) knowingly introducing errors and ignoring local mappers.
rmikke (2017-03-07 09:02:33+00:00): @Tomas Straupis:
"You're doing work which belongs to OpenHistoricalMap, not OpenStreetMap." 

Until it is still the same place, it has still the same Polish name and it belongs in name:pl in OSM.

"This explains why some of the name:pl tags you add are incorrect: they have nothing in common with official name, neither phonetically, nor by the meaning. While I'm not interested in name:pl tags, expect those to be fixed by other mappers."

Umm, Polish name doesn't have to have anything in common with official name, especially if the official name has been changed. For example Polish name for Kaliningrad is still "Królewiec". So, unless there is new Polish names in use, or @wmyrda has made an evident mistake, there is nothing to correct. Otherwise of course it should be individually corrected.
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-07 09:39:16+00:00): As wmyrda has pointed out, he is taking a map from 1928-1939 and trying to map what he sees there to todays villages. Both mapping such different things as well as putting names from that map is incorrect. If his purpose is solely to use that old map to get Polish names - then he is using bad source. If he wants to put information of that historical map to some GIS DB (in this case OSM), then he is putting data into wrong place because that data will divert from his hard work really fast.
But that is your choice. I've spent too much time on this pointless topic already.
rmikke (2017-03-07 10:18:12+00:00): @Tomas Straupis You are kidding, right?
"And it is not blackmailing, it is showing that rude ignorance of now KNOWN local rules is far from "doing a good job". If somebody keeps their house clean, it is not polite for the outsider to walk inside with dirty boots and tell "just buy the cleaning service"."

You are not requesting outsider to keep clean what is clean. You are requesting outsider that provides you something to clean up your house in places you haven't managed to clean up yourself.
rmikke (2017-03-07 10:25:16+00:00): @Tomas Straupis
"If his purpose is solely to use that old map to get Polish names - then he is using bad source."
OK, if you know better source of Polish names, just provide it. I'm sure @wmyrda will be happy to have more current data. Otherwise, the last Polish name in use is still a valid Polish name.
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-07 10:27:18+00:00): „Outsider“ (as you put it) is not providing anything we need (we need current data, not historical one; current translations to a lot of languages for placenames can easily come from wikipedia/wikidata which we already have, so adding them is redundant even more than name:lt tag is).
„Outsider“ is just knowingly ignoring our rules.
In the end you get a data subset which does not represent neither current Polish names, nor historical Polish names of specific period. So this dataset cannot be used for any of such purposes, so it is useless...
But once again, do what you want. I will fix your errors but I will not guard the data against fixes of name:pl values by other mappers.
wmyrda (2017-03-07 10:40:39+00:00): "„Outsider“ (as you put it) is not providing anything we need (we need current data, not historical one;"
It might be historical for you but is present for us and still valid today us it is very rare for polish government to change the names for already established locations. Project also is an international one and not Lithuanian therefore in case you do not need something does not mean others would not do. Deletion knowingly deleting of international values and data is considered destructive and goes against every possible cooperation rule in OSM and like I said previously would very likely be the subject of DWG intervention.
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-07 10:47:48+00:00): Never knew that polish government is somehow controlling names of foreign countries :-)
wmyrda (2017-03-07 10:50:21+00:00): http://ksng.gugik.gov.pl/pliki/wykaz_polskich_nazw_geograficznych.pdf
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-07 11:17:44+00:00): Cool. From what I looked at all names are either phonetic, or meaning translation from current Lithuanian names. With Lithuanian name and coordinate it is possible to import them automatically. Looks like a perfect source for name:pl value.
So it is unclear what is the point to take names from hundred years old map...
wmyrda (2017-03-07 11:23:49+00:00): For example registry does not have all of them (hamlets example) and it is easier to find your way around on the map then on the registry. Regardless of the source it does not give you right to delete the values introduced in OSM as you clearly see those names do not change monthly as the current registry is from 2013 and very likely based on data gathered much earlier eg. 80 years ago.
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-07 11:34:35+00:00): When did I delete any name:pl value?

I'm only saying that when/if village/hamlet is deleted from Lithuanian placenames, it is deleted from OSM. All values including name, name:lt, name:pl, name:xx, etc.
All places currently in OSM which are not in official registry are also deleted (after short period of being left as place=locality).
rmikke (2017-03-07 15:10:55+00:00): "Never knew that polish government is somehow controlling names of foreign countries :-)"
Umm, Polish names are part of Polish languages, so it's rather obvious that they are decided by Polish institutions (not necessarily government). Exactly the same way as some Lithuanian body decides how you call Karaliaučius, not Russians.

But there is another thing that made me truly curious: in what circumstances are places removed from official registers?
Tomas Straupis (2017-03-07 15:13:09+00:00): When people care about other peoples goals, priorities and respect the time they spend on it.
rmikke (2017-03-08 20:56:09+00:00): Ok, now I'm sure you are kidding. You really expect me to believe, that "when people care about other peoples goals, priorities and respect the time they spend on it", their places are removed from official registers?
mavl (2017-10-08 13:50:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52729451 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46623919].
trial (2021-11-16 18:57:20+00:00): D'après l'ortho https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4720497489 est au milieu de la route :-(. Tu rappelles où il est par rapport à la voirie ?
gendy54 (2021-11-16 20:33:07+00:00): Mets la plus vers l'intérieur entre la Rue du Port et le Boulevard de la Laita. On ne voit pas l'ortho quand on rajoute sur les appli, mais je les mets toujours du bon côté.

Donat
trial (2021-11-17 11:47:11+00:00): Fait. Mais "grass" ne doit pas être correct : ça semble être une propriété privée close.
neuhausr (2017-03-17 19:50:40+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM! It looks like you unintentionally overlapped the lake and park to the west of 450th Ave. Can you try to fix it? Let me know if you have problems. Cheers!
Spanholz (2017-03-06 23:27:30+00:00): You linked to the  Library in Warsaw, Poland. Is there a wikipedia entry for the Library in Warsaw, NY?
Joshua Herman (2017-03-07 03:20:08+00:00): @Spanholz: that's what i get for not checking my links. thanks for pointing this out. will update now.
michalfabik (2017-03-23 21:37:33+00:00): Hi, to my knowledge the restaurant doesn't charge for WiFi usage, so internet_access:fee should be "no".
eggie (2017-03-06 15:22:25+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen#Wegen
Een path is niet geschikt voor auto's. Ook niet als het eigen terrein is. 
Map what's on the ground. Zie wiki. :)