piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
lipuma (2025-01-19 17:38:02+00:00): Kunnen al deze routes dan niet gewoon worden verwijderd? Een aantal staan 3 jaar later nog steeds op OSM...
Peter Elderson (2025-01-19 19:40:56+00:00): Tja... mappers hebben hier veel moeite ingestopt, en de toekomst van de groene wissels was niet zeker, misschien zouden het knooppuntrondjes worden. Ik heb ze daarom alleen gedisused met een note, en dan ligt de bal weer bij die mappers. Misschien een onderwerp voor het forum?
gabro00 (2021-09-15 16:46:11+00:00): Vagy a repülőnapra vitték ki a másikat?
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
Jordi MF (2021-12-23 12:43:04+00:00): Respecto a la "Cueva Garonte", no encuentro información oficial por ningún sitio. He encontrado que alguien la ha llamado "Cueva Caronte". Parece que es un nombre que se ha podido popularizar entre algunas personas. Trasladaré el nombre a loc_name.
IWBRABANT (2022-02-06 14:05:52+00:00): De hecho, este nombre no debe estar presente porque aparece en Google Maps
Jordi MF (2022-02-07 14:39:37+00:00): Efectivamente, no podemos copiar datos de Google Maps. Gracias.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:18:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
JeroenvanderGun (2021-09-14 15:04:01+00:00): Zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Koninkrijk_der_Nederlanden
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
joost schouppe (2021-10-14 09:37:30+00:00): Philippe, do you happen to know if the cycleway along the canal that you touched is now usable? I mean this segment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28751184
I saw this in March from the south, and it looked totally lost. Someone reported this as well two weeks ago, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2872585
opendcc (2022-09-30 06:47:56+00:00): Hier gibt es einen Hinweis dazu: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3373501
hauke-stieler (2021-10-09 22:32:32+00:00): Hi,

du hast hier die Baustelle eingetragen mit dem Hinweis, dass sie bis 30.09. existiert. Ist die Straße hier also wieder befahrbar?

Grüße
Hauke
MediStudi (2021-10-13 07:46:45+00:00): Müsste - ja. Bin nicht mehr in der Nähe aber ich werde sie raus nehmen
hauke-stieler (2021-10-14 18:01:24+00:00): Wunderbar, dankeschön :)
maraf24 (2021-10-26 18:07:46+00:00): I dalej tej drogi nie budują.
Tak myślę, że może mają problemy z tą budową.
aixbrick (2021-09-15 07:10:53+00:00): Hello,
no these connections you added do not exist on the ground. Maybe you should use an aerial image with higher resolution.
Regards
Aleg Surta (2021-09-16 16:34:43+00:00): Hello!
Thank you for providing up-to-date information! This road has been deleted.
Regards
aixbrick (2021-09-15 07:11:31+00:00): please see  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111202218
Aleg Surta (2021-09-16 16:45:13+00:00): Hello! Thank you for providing up-to-date information! This road has been deleted. Regards
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111300585
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111202259
aixbrick (2021-09-16 17:05:10+00:00): Thank you for both corrections.
eggie (2021-09-14 16:47:52+00:00): Dag Carl ,
Is hier werkelijk een op de rijbaan aangegeven voetgangersoversteekplaats? 

MVG
eggie
carl05 (2021-09-15 07:30:39+00:00): hoi, 
het is een oversteekplaats naar een speelplaats en is bovenop een snelheidsheuvel. zoals aangegeven crossing:unmarked, maar wel een duidelijke oversteekplaats met een voetpad met hekjes aan beide kanten.

gr, Carl
eggie (2021-09-15 07:40:11+00:00): Oke Carl...  duidelijk

Mapse
eggie
4004 (2021-09-16 15:38:32+00:00): hi GhostEye, this has been discussed locally, and we've decided on this being a link and not continuation of the street
GhostEye (2021-09-16 17:12:14+00:00): Thank you for the feedback! I will be sure to leave those as links. I hope you have a great day.
ivanbranco (2021-09-17 16:18:15+00:00): Hi mapeadora,

there's a problem with this node tags, can you fix it? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9091562193
mapeadora (2021-09-17 16:31:45+00:00): Thanks! It's fixed
hauke-stieler (2021-10-09 22:35:58+00:00): Hi,

bei den Angaben von "check_date" und "start_date" hast du dich hier glaube ich versehen. Du hast bei beidem 2021-10-22 eingetragen (also 22. Oktober 2021). Bei check_date kommt das Datum rein an dem du die Vor-Ort-Lage geprüft hast (also in diesem Fall ein Datum vor dem 14.9.) und bei start_date kommt das Datum rein an dem die Baustelle in Kraft tritt. Da also in Zukunft ein wenig aufpassen ;)

Grüße
Hauke
MediStudi (2021-10-13 07:46:03+00:00): Oh ok. Dachte check date ist das datum an dem man sich das angucken soll zum checken (und in diesem fall dann die Baustelle zu entfernen)
hauke-stieler (2021-10-14 18:09:40+00:00): Das Datum an dem etwas erneut geprüft werden soll wäre interessant zu mappen, wird aber nicht erfasst. Für Baustellen oder sonstige Dinge, die irgendwann eröffnet werden/fertig sind, gibt es höchstens den key opening_date also sowas wie "opening_date=2021-11-23" (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_date). Den könnte man dafür nutzen.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:01:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:00:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
marc__marc (2022-11-09 14:14:51+00:00): Bonjour Denis,
que veux dire detail=track par ex sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2560235 ? cfr ma question sur talk-fr
Cordialement,
Marc
Denis_Helfer (2022-11-10 09:43:52+00:00): Bonjour Marc,
Ce sont des vieilleries qui datent du temps où toutes les lignes n'étaient pas tracées à la voie. Etant donné que le défaut c'est track=1. On peut virer en masse. Pas sur ma liste des priorités. Je te laisse faire le relais sur la liste de discussion.
marc__marc (2022-11-10 15:23:08+00:00): Merci pour ton retour.
je suppose que tu parlais de tracks=1 (avec un S final)
je lance la procédure d'édition de masse sur talk-fr
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
eggie (2021-09-14 16:36:28+00:00): Dag Pyronick.. Je vraagt feedback..
Lijkt me oke zo.. De routering gaat in ieder geval nu zoals de bebording aangeeft. 
MVG
eggie
user_1566574 (2021-09-30 13:27:35+00:00): BONJOUR,
Il n'est pas nécessaire de mettre en MAJUSCULES les NOMS des COMMERCES, sauf s'ils s'écrivent obligatoirement en MAJUSCULES comme SFR :
• https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1412864652
• https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6697603398

MERCI pour vos ajouts (ne vous en faites pas, même les contributeurs expérimentés font des erreurs) ;)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
mariotomo (2021-09-14 17:24:30+00:00): looks quite nice, thanks.  do you think you can follow the Río San Juan near Calobre?  and the pressurised stream?
Nœud : 7435260825
jmgisbert (2021-09-14 17:00:45+00:00): Modification de ces bâtiments : j'y travaille depuis plus de 18 ans
ivanbranco (2021-09-18 08:22:16+00:00): Hi Archixa,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983267253

a landuse this little? Maybe you wanted to add a building instead? Also you wrote the name in caps
Абобус (2021-09-16 06:43:42+00:00): Неплохо
NieWnen (2021-09-17 19:39:03+00:00): Zweryfikowałem i chwilowo niemal 1:1.
Da się przejechać, ale nadal budowa nieskończona, znaki nie postawione, studzienki odkryte, przejścia nienamalowane itp. Po drugiej stronie CPR, cały czas istnieje.
eteb3 (2021-09-14 17:06:41+00:00): forgot my sources: SS16 sourced from eyeballs on signs on Crouch End Hill and Crouch Hill. alignment from Bing
SK53 (2021-09-14 19:02:34+00:00): Hi Jim,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It's great to have someone updating a new build estate with local knowledge.

I just thought it worthwhile to say that you can change the status of a road marked as "under construction" by clicking where it says "highway feature" and selecting an alternative such as residential road. Also you can cut a single road (right click menu) and keep part as construction & as houses are occupied the other part residential.

We know that delivery companies make a great deal of use of OSM (Amazon Logistics are significant contributors), so there are definitely advantages getting the information into OSM.

Best wishes,

Jerry aka SK53
Jim Messenger (2021-09-14 20:35:04+00:00): Thanks Jerry.  I am quite conversant on updating Google Maps but OpenStreet is much more detailed so any help much appreciated.  OpenStreet is used by another 'project' called Geograph Map where photographers try to map all of the UK pinning photos to the map.  So missing local roads are causing me issues.
SK53 (2021-09-14 21:40:21+00:00): Hi Jim,

I'm an occasional Geographer myself & have even added a few in this area, such as: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/4651030. 

In Ireland OSM is the base map used, but there are two dedicated contributors in Northern Ireland - Kenny Allen & Albert Bridge - I've been indebted to their photos (& particularly the descriptions) in helping resolve map details on OSM

Unfortunately the area around Coalville, Ibstock & Swadlincote is not mapped in as much detail as some other parts of the East Midlands

Jerry
Jim Messenger (2021-09-15 09:14:34+00:00): Hi,   Nice photo.  Of course Dunelm now moved out.  Yes I noticed the initial surge of photos on Geographer  has reduced.  I had not looked at it for 2 - 3 years.  I am recording the progress of this new estate from greenfield to completion 2020-23 so thought it would be good to put it on Geographer for posterity.
SK53 (2021-09-15 13:10:42+00:00): Sounds an interesting project. I've updated the Dunelm node too (was just passing through Coalville after a visit to woods around Coventry had been rained off, so it was what we call drive-by mapping"). 

When adding that I noticed the obvious cinema building just to the S of Marlborough Square & based name on recent Food Hygine data.

J
bjmc812 (2021-09-14 19:01:00+00:00): Not a fake park, editor isnt even from this area and is attacking edits because of Pokemon GO drama.
GinaroZ (2021-09-15 17:40:12+00:00): There's four buildings around https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/77199789 showing on aerial imagery but not on the map - have these been demolished?
ARYJSRJTBAETHAEEJAHR (2021-09-15 17:50:42+00:00): Those four building have been demolished, but I'm unsure about the walled of areas nearby and the parking spots
AndersAndersson (2021-09-15 10:05:36+00:00): Hello
I think something went wrong here.
This is not a tunnel.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/102571419
Sandal man (2021-09-15 11:12:40+00:00): Hi Es gab schon einen Pfad, den überlappenden Teil habe ich entfernt. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983288109#map=19/42.34392/-0.72412
user_2066394 (2021-09-16 10:59:32+00:00): Was ist mit den Öffnungszeiten passiert?
Klaus Stein (2021-09-16 20:52:19+00:00): Sorry, hatte ein POI Edit über Osmand probiert, da kam nur die halbe Info mit (wollte eigentlich den Namen ändern). Ist korrigiert.
user_2066394 (2021-09-16 20:58:29+00:00): einwandfrei
olo81 (2021-09-22 18:17:57+00:00): Byłem z wizją lokalną i nie ma żadnych  tabliczek z nazwą drogi? 
Nie nazywamy dróg które nie mają takiej nazwy!
olo81 (2021-09-22 18:22:07+00:00): pociągnite reverterem
Vinber (2021-09-16 13:37:28+00:00): Bonjour Clacliclac et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap !
un petit lien d'accueil : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Merci pour l'ajout de la boulangerie, je me suis permis de "séparer" le point adresse (le numéro de la rue) de la boulangerie, qui est plutôt la pratique pour éviter de mélanger les 2.

Voici la boulangerie https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9097812403

Encore merci et n'hésites pas si tu as des questions
Frans S (2021-09-17 14:11:26+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Pleas do not includ multiple buildings in 1 mapping.
Best regards and keep mappings
eggie (2021-09-14 19:19:16+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Wesley Hendriks (2021-09-14 19:26:34+00:00): Dank je wel Eggie!
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
Pt873 (2021-09-15 23:43:49+00:00): Olá, tudo bem? Até onde eu sei, o nome da via que foi colocado como "Avenida Dr. Alfredo Salim" na verdade é "Avenida Avicênia".
UncoolGuyJake (2021-09-17 19:10:43+00:00): I updated the name of this road for the section from Avenida Litorânea to Avenida dos Holandeses.
UncoolGuyJake (2021-09-17 19:19:41+00:00): I moved the old name (Avenida Avicênia) to the "alt_name field"
eggie (2021-09-14 19:26:12+00:00): Dag fkorpershoek.. Je bedoeling is natuurlijk goed, maar is dit een vrijliggend voetpad?
Soms kun je de tagging ook opnemen in het fietspad met sidewalk=right of left
Aan de zuidzijde heb je het pad vastgemaakt aan een administratieve grens. Het zal zo nie routeren. Maak het bv vast aan het fietspad op die plaats,.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-14 19:55:29+00:00): Wellicht nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen.. Bij deze alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-14 20:01:38+00:00): Het pad heb ik losgemaakt van de 'administratieve grens' en voorlopig even verbonden met het fietspad.. Uo to you verder.
Gr eggie
fkorpershoek (2021-09-14 21:52:55+00:00): Dit is inderdaad een vrij liggend pad. Die aansluiting was inderdaad slordig, zal ik op letten. Thanks!
user_1566574 (2021-09-30 13:24:38+00:00): Bonjour,
 Ce lieu de culte que vous avez ajouté (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5893462429), pouvez-vous m'en dire un peu plus ? S'agit-il d'une mosquée ? Autre ?

Merci pour votre contribution ! :)
user_1566574 (2022-03-16 21:59:52+00:00): Possiblement une erreur, je vais donc la supprimer bientôt.
orthocircular (2021-09-14 20:42:48+00:00): Hi there! Do we know what this feature is? It looks like a parking lot, was named Dog Park until recently, and is tagged as a car rental business...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111210535
eggie (2021-09-14 19:52:44+00:00): Dag fkorpershoek.. Ik heb even wat landuse en water ingevuld. dat zal je op die PDOK luchtfoto nog niet zien.
Wanneer je deze achtergrond instelt heb je een recentere foto.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-09-14 19:52:56+00:00): De link  

https://service.pdok.nl/hwh/luchtfotorgb/wms/v1_0?&request=GetCapabilities&service=wms
fkorpershoek (2021-09-14 21:59:31+00:00): Hoi Eggie, hoe gebruik ik die link?
eggie (2021-09-14 22:14:50+00:00): Als editor gebruik ik Josm. Daar kun je die links simpel toevoegen. In iD schijnt dat ook te gaan. Kijk in de editmodus bij kaartlagen.. achtergronden.. ergens rechts even uit mn hoofd.. Daar zal ook wel ergens een lege regel zijn waar je een url kunt invullen om een niet standaard achtergrond toe te voegen.
Dat moet je dan wel steeds opnieuw doen.
Het beste kun je overschakelen naar de betere editor Josm.
Zal je morgen wel even een link sturen boe die te installeren.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-09-15 05:56:54+00:00): Even wat leesvoer over josm en achtergronden:
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 

BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

Forumdraadje ..  De beste imagery layers om NL OSM te mappen met JOSM. 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64644 

Hier kun je zien hoe je de .jos file kunt gebruiken binnen JOSM.  
https://youtu.be/33EenoZezWg 

en over de PDOK
nieuwste layers OSGeo  PDOK 

 

https://service.pdok.nl/hwh/luchtfotorgb/wms/v1_0?&request=GetCapabilities&service=wms 

geoforum pdok actueel links 

https://geoforum.nl/t/nieuwe-url-s-voor-de-pdok-luchtfoto/5157   

 

Via forum deze links? Nog niet geprobeerd 

https://www.pdok.nl/introductie/-/article/luchtfoto-pdok 

en veder heb je satellietdataportaal..
Ook een aanrader.
zie voor laatste link satellietdataportaal 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=62966&p=4 

 

https://satellietdataportaal.nl/wms/Mosaics/service?service=WMS&request=GetCapabilities 

 Succes,
eggie
eggie (2021-09-17 11:25:02+00:00): Hier nog iets van een handleiding gevonden hoe je foto's op de achtergrond te krijgen
https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/josm/josm-adding-imagery/
felipeeugenio (2021-10-18 12:25:06+00:00): Hola.
Agregó una calle sobre otra. Por favor poner atención a esto. Saludos
AkuAnakTimur (2021-09-17 02:17:28+00:00): Hello. Why a "painted barrier" is considered to split a physically undivided highway into two divided (dual carriageway) highway?

See https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/59#issuecomment-692530410
AkuAnakTimur (2021-09-17 02:20:38+00:00): If it's going to help with navigation, route D110 doesn't connect with eastbound route 209, making the links very redundant.
Tri_Hugger (2021-09-20 15:24:25+00:00): Hello AkuAnakTimur, 

Thank you for pointing this policy out. I will consider it in the future. I have set the road back to bidirectional. 

- Tri_Hugger
treestryder (2022-08-19 23:12:47+00:00): Are service ways under roofs really tunnels?
tuttiton (2022-08-20 00:03:43+00:00): well i guess not really. i've seen it made this way in a few places and continued to use it this way for a while but i supppose adding level tag l to the building is probably a better way to do it
treestryder (2022-08-20 04:19:53+00:00): I think you would want to make the roof a separate building part. Otherwise you'll levitate the entire building. 😏

Not sure if I can make the next one, however, I'd like to invite you to join other Michigan mappers who have been meeting each month. See the community section of our Wiki page.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan#Community

This would be a good discussion topic.
treestryder (2022-08-20 04:21:32+00:00): Wait a minute... I think I know who this is. Changed your username?
tuttiton (2022-08-20 12:03:30+00:00): yeah i changed my nickname here about half a year ago:) and i'm a frequent visitor to Michigan mappers meeting
treestryder (2022-08-22 14:42:41+00:00): Hmm...
 * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Droof
 * https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered

I would lean toward "covered=yes" on the way, connected to the edges of the building's roof, as they suggest.

<shrug>
Andrea Musuruane (2021-09-15 12:26:45+00:00): Ciao. Alcune note. I nomi in OSM si inseriscono senza abbreviazioni. Quindi "San Sebastiano" non va bene, meglio "Chiesa Parrocchiale di San Sebastiano". I parcheggi non devono avere lati in comune con le strade. Le strade devono avere i nomi delle strade e non delle località. name=Località su un tabellone informativo cosa rappresenta? In genere gli edifici hanno angoli retti, quindi devi usare la funzione "Ortogonalizza figura" di JOSM. foot=yes su un path è il valore di default ed è inutile inserirlo. Ciao, Andrea
emmanuelecois (2021-09-15 18:22:19+00:00): Ho fatto le modifiche suggerite.
Non vi è il nome della via che attraversa la frazione di Sulpiano, rimane quindi senza nome.
Il "tabellone informativo" in realtà è l'indicazione del comune e della frazione comprensiva di altitudine, dati riportati sul muro della prima casa. Mi dispiace per l'informazione dell'altitudine, ma non trattandosi di un vero tabellone informativo ho eliminato anche quel punto per mantenere la coerenza delle mappe.
Saluti.
Frans S (2021-09-18 11:43:12+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark.
Please do not connect nodes of building to other buildings and features
Best regards
ottwiz (2021-09-14 19:35:27+00:00): + survey, ma egyetemről hazafelé menet láttam meg ezt a táblát és az apróságokat
DressyPear4 (2021-09-15 11:41:05+00:00): Olá ao invés de deletar um caminho ou desenhar uma via sobre a outra, apenas selecione o nó, depois clique com botão direito sobre ele e escolha "dividir caminho". Assim preserva o histórico de outros mapeadores e evita ter que ser corrigido toda hora.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111212123
ivanbranco (2021-09-24 17:02:27+00:00): Ciao,

non ho capito perché avete cancellato i precedenti per ricrearlo ex-novo. Se c'erano due bivacchi bastava cancellarne uno (il piu' recente possibilmente ) e aggiornare i tag del rimanente. Creandolo ex-novo si è andata a perdere la storia del nodo.

Vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
Frans S (2021-09-20 14:27:26+00:00): Hallo. In dit project staan ook hoge gebouwen. Die moeten op en wat andere manier gemapt worden.
Kijk even naar dit artikel als je wilt
Vriendelijke groeten
How to map tall buildings

Hi. Are you aware how tall buildings have to be mapped and positioned on their footprints? In the centre of some cities are rather tall buildings which are bad mapped and not shifted to their footprint.  I’ve consulted Russel Deffner about this issues. He asked to pay attention to that so validators are  going to correct these mappings or invalidate those tasks where there are wrong mapped and ask you mappers to redraw them according to the method shown in the video (see link ) I will refer to a Youtube video of Bigardot where he explains how to map these.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAPiGntG6fs

This video is made for JOSM, but in ID editor you can use it as well. Best regards
literan (2021-09-15 17:31:52+00:00): какие-то некрасивые зазору у вас тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/983369328/history#map=16/56.0155/36.6948 получились между двумя лесами. Просьба сделать поаккуратнее. И вырубка видна на снимке..
eggie (2021-09-14 20:04:25+00:00): Dag Wesley..
Tip: 
Tegenwoordig taggen we alle info bij op de reeds aanwezige adresnode. Dus geen bedrijfs- en adresgegevens op de gebouw omtrek. 
MVG
eggie