piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-07-08 16:22:04+00:00): Probeer wanneer je wilt doorzetten met "mappen" snel over te stappen naar een beter editor. JOSM. editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

Daar zit een validator in die verkeerde uploads voorkomt. Even erg moeilijk in het begin, maar alles went. Kijk ook verder op het forum van osm. je kunt jezelf voorstellen onder het draadje welkom. Inlog hetzelfde als je osm account.
eggie (2017-07-08 16:34:56+00:00): Het zuidelijk deel van het Gelders Park heb ik losgemaakt en gecombineerd met het noordelijke deel. Het is immers één park met één naam. 
Dat niet plakken dus nog onder de knie krijgen. .. en even omschakelen.. park is geen landuse.. Het is de functie.
eggie (2017-07-08 16:42:24+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-08 16:47:46+00:00): Goed gelukt!
mariotomo (2022-06-28 17:17:08+00:00): hola. siguen en OSM? el objeto "Puerto Escondido", a qué se refiere? es una playa? un pueblo? el objeto que ustedes mejoraron sólo tiene el nombre y no declara su categoría.
DD1GJ (2017-11-09 07:13:32+00:00): Reverted due to inadmissible source Bayernatlas
Øukasz (2017-08-17 10:18:08+00:00): Hello,

Did you notice in the following changeset user https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/%DA%95%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%AA%DB%8C removed what looks like valid data from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19792935

I can't understand his changeset comment unfortunately

Best regards
Gh0stz0x (2017-07-08 18:13:34+00:00): Benvenuto su OpenStreetMap. Sicuro che la strada vada nel lago con un tornante? Poi sul nodo della strada hai messo lago della ninfa è il tornante che si chiama così?? Poi un altra cosa: non puoi descrivere meglio cosa hai fatto nei changeset, piuttosto che scrivere aggiornamento necessario?? Grazie! 😁
BSTH (2017-07-10 12:22:03+00:00): L'immagine che mi hai allegato non è esatta, forse ho commesso un errore intanto che facevo le altre modifiche, sei sicuro che venga da me? Ho aggiunto n.2 parcheggi di cui uno per camper e una sbarra sulla strada chiusa in via dell'aeronautica. Non volevo modificare strade. Il mio intento era quello di modificare la opemmtb map e non le street ma non ho trovato la via per farlo.
come si fa a ripristinare la strada come prima?
Aggiornamento necessario lo scrivo perchè non ci sono molte giustificazioni ad una modifica.
Gh0stz0x (2017-07-10 16:28:05+00:00): Le openmtb map sono basate su dati OpenStreetMap (OSM), quindi quando si modifica OSM si modifica openmtb. Non ci sono modi per modificare le openmtb, escludendo OSM e comunque non avrebbe senso. Hai letto quanto hanno scritto: https://openmtbmap.org/it/tutorials/participate/
La strada la ripristino io, perchè non credo che ci sia il modo di farlo con ID. Lo faccio con JOSM. In OSM non devi giustificare la modifica, ma solo descrivere cosa hai fatto: "Ho aggiunto n.2 parcheggi di cui uno per camper e una sbarra sulla strada chiusa in via dell'aeronautica." :-) Grazie di collaborare in OpenStreeMap, che è prima di tutto un database dove altri progetti possono attingere. 
Buon Mapping
JamesKingdom (2017-09-16 20:34:52+00:00): The petrol station is already mapped @ https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4958795150 , I removed the duplicate node.
eggie (2017-07-08 20:25:51+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-07-08 20:32:49+00:00): Is dit wel een officieel monument of een tijdelijk 'íets' dat met het summer festival te maken heeft. Graag reactie.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
BCNorwich (2017-07-09 05:58:56+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
The new line you have added to the live worldwide OSM database in Primrose Grove has no tags to describe what it is. It is therefore of no value to OSM. 
Further it in part duplicates the line of an existing way (a footpath). Also one branch of your way ends without joining to another way, making it (if it is a footpath) a cul-de-sac.
I await your comment.
Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2017-08-09 10:09:19+00:00): No response so removed the duplicate, untagged way. Next visit I'll check to see if there are more paths here.
Gh0stz0x (2017-07-08 20:35:55+00:00): Ok aggiungere il defibrillatore, ma il sito è dell' operator che ne ha la gestione??
Fillo (2017-07-08 21:43:48+00:00): Si, il defibrilatore e del sito, che detiene la proprietà della spiaggia
Gh0stz0x (2017-07-09 07:47:51+00:00): Ok, perfetto. Se gestiscono loro la manutenzione, li puoi mettere sul tag operator. Buon mapping!
Gppes (2017-07-16 18:05:25+00:00): Hallo, Du hast in diesem Changeset die Flaeche mit der Way-ID 99356751 von farmland auf grass gesetzt. Darf man erfahren warum?
SHARCRASH (2017-08-22 07:57:19+00:00): Hello! You created this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4958840621 without the tag "amenity=parking", instead you used a tag "tourism=attraction" and named it "Parking". My guess it's not a parking since there is no way for vehicules going to that parking. So what is this really?
gdiamandiev (2017-08-24 21:35:04+00:00): Hello,
I'm using maps.me to add points on the go. I did not find parking as an option. This is possible to get by a car. I was there with my friends with 3 cars. It is quite steep but it saves about 2-3 hours walking (both directions). Also there are 2 parking on top - private and public. I can show you 360 image from the parking if you'd like.
SHARCRASH (2017-08-25 08:51:33+00:00): OK! Thanks for the feedback! :) Yeah not always easy with third party services. I will correct the tag. At least it will be rendered correctly on most maps.
PT-53 (2020-01-08 10:28:20+00:00): Hallo Akkurator,
im OSM-Inspector werden auf dem Marienfriedhof von Ravensburg für die meisten Wege der Hinweis "islands_bicycle" angezeigt.
Ursache ist, daß Du u.a. an diesem Tor
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2561226197/history
u.a. das Merkmal
bicycle=no eingetragen hast, dieses Merkmal an den meisten Wegen wie z.B an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249534431/history
dagegen fehlt.
Access-Werte am Tor und an den Wegen dahinter sollten aber übereinstimmen.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-01-08 10:32:08+00:00): PS: OSMI-Link:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.62894&lat=47.80411&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=islands,islands_car,islands_bicycle,islands_all
Akkurator (2020-01-08 12:24:24+00:00): Antwort siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51533715
Findus23 (2017-07-08 19:12:03+00:00): Falsche Kommentar, Nah und Frisch entfernt
literan (2017-07-12 13:58:36+00:00): правильные теги: historic=memorial
memorial=plaque. Поправил.
keithonearth (2017-07-08 20:28:22+00:00): I forgot to edit the chageset summery to say that this is adding the name:squ tag for Horseshoe bay. Not Vancouver.
keithonearth (2017-07-08 20:27:08+00:00): Damn it. I forgot to edit the chageset summery to say that this is adding the name:squ tag for the Stawamus River. Not Vancouver.
GerdP (2017-08-22 14:09:57+00:00): Hi!
Please chck highway=Sentier Burel
I assume you meant name=Sentier Burel ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/272227574
IIVQ (2017-09-30 16:14:27+00:00): Yes. Gormur already changed it. 
My apologies
RicoElectrico (2017-07-08 20:42:35+00:00): Cześć, dzięki że poprawiasz nazwy ulic. Zauważ, że adresy budynków nie poprawią się też same i je także należy zmienić.
Karpfly (2017-07-08 20:56:03+00:00): Cześć, nie ma sprawy, wiem że trzeba zmienić adresy budynków ale chociaż na szybko chciałem zaktualizować nazwy ulic bo zmiany są od stycznia a nikt nie zaktualizował, budynki pozmieniam jak będę miał trochę więcej czasu.
RicoElectrico (2017-07-08 21:18:53+00:00): No to mogę zmienić sam, w edytorze JOSM hurtowa zamiana to szybka sprawa w przeciwieństwie do iD.
RicoElectrico (2017-07-08 21:34:23+00:00): Już zrobione :)

Popatrz jutro na tej mapie czy jakieś żółte gwiazdki nie zostały w tej okolicy: http://v3.mrowka.org/adresy/
Karpfly (2017-07-09 03:28:26+00:00): Super :) muszę obczaić tego JOSM bo nawet nie wiedziałem że jest coś takiego :)
Glassman (2017-07-09 00:13:29+00:00): I tried to get confirmation from Camp Korey but they never replied. Glad to see that someone is knowledgeable in the area.
robert (2017-07-08 21:09:46+00:00): Hi - welcome to OpenStreetMap!

You'd probably be better off connecting those two road segments together - I don't think most osm-based routers consider a parking area traversable.
Stewbeedoo (2017-07-08 21:27:13+00:00): OKAY. Thanks
rainerU (2017-07-09 04:55:55+00:00): Hallo,
dass nur das kurze Stück von der Straße bis zu dem Radweg ein ausgeschilderter landw. Weg ist, ist unwahrscheinlich. Ich vermute, dass auch der Radweg ein Wirtschaftsweg ist. vielleicht kannst du das ja mal überprüfen.
Gruß
Rainer
P.S.: ich hätte den Weg als track, grade1 getaggt.
Jo89195 (2017-07-09 12:55:10+00:00): Hi,
Ich vermute dasselbe, jedoch ist es leider nicht ersichtlich da ja nur ein Schild be dem kurzen Stück steht. Vermutlich ist es ein Wirtschaftsweg bis zu dem Feldwweg http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25202216#map=16/48.3477/9.9865&layers=N
rainerU (2017-07-09 15:32:06+00:00): Auf deinen OpenStreetCam-Bildern vom Januer sieht man, dass an den Kreuzungen und Kreisverkehren der Wiblinger Querspange zum Teil keine Verkehrschilder an den Wirtschafts- bzw. Radwegen angebracht sind. Wenn das immer noch so ist, dann ist die Situation unklar. 

Sollte von meiner Seite nur ein Hinweis sein. Vielleicht kannst du ja schauen, wenn du wieder  du wieder mal dort vorbei kommst.
eggie (2017-07-08 22:09:05+00:00): De Kolfschotenstraat is hier niet bekend. Wat is de reden dat u het adres heeft aangepast. Ook de postcode is niet volgens de normering ingevuld. Ik draai uw bijdrage terug.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
eggie (2017-07-08 22:10:48+00:00): reverted
eggie (2017-07-08 22:14:31+00:00): Het door u veranderde adres ligt in A'dam
https://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=kolfschotenstraat#map=19/52.31701/4.97128
Commodoortje (2017-07-09 06:41:32+00:00): Inmiddels heb ik 2 aangebrachte notes gesloten.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1057545
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1057546
marco406 (2017-07-10 06:56:07+00:00): Zmiana 50048499 nie dotyczy obwodnicy Gorzowa. Dotyczy tymczasowego fragmentu drogi w rejonie węzła Lubin Północ.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-10 06:58:28+00:00): Znaczy, coś popsułem? :-(
marco406 (2017-07-10 08:25:17+00:00): Chyba niepotrzebnie wycofana zmiana. Nic tam nie otwierałem. Dorysowałem tylko tymczasową drogę na którą wkrótce zostanie przeniesiony ruch. Prosta rzecz, jedna kreska...
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-10 10:38:29+00:00): Popraw jeśli możesz. Zapewne pochopnie wycofałem ten zestaw zmian - zrobiłem to dlatego, że konfliktował się z tym właściwym...
Dzięki! :-)
user_6110846 (2017-11-02 14:06:32+00:00): улицы со жытловой застройкай - это резидентиал . Сервис ставится когда имеем ген план улиц и знаем что эт о   заезд . А пасколька улицы не нанесьонные то пока пусть будет резидентиал . Ведь существуют проулочки на пару домов
nammala (2017-07-10 05:26:31+00:00): Hi Shero,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). Noticed that you have added park tag for parking. Please follow the wiki for OSM for tagging . 

Regards,
nammala
gpstracks (2017-07-09 07:41:57+00:00): It seems a really weird name.

Are you sure?
Alan Bragg (2017-11-22 16:58:30+00:00): Thanks for changing my path to footway. I suppose footway=sidewalk would do the same thing as highway=footway +surface=paved
eggie (2017-07-09 06:03:05+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd. De edit zal worden teruggedraaid.
Groot vlak aangebracht over dit stadsdeel.
Dit geeft schade aan de kaart.
We gaan er vanuit dat het per abuis is gebeurd.
eggie (2017-07-09 06:08:17+00:00): Reverted
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50140960

Al je edits komen daadwerkelijk op de kaart. Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
nammala (2017-07-10 07:36:43+00:00): Hi Martin,

May I know the reason behind changing the place types from town to village.

Best regards,
nammala
Martin868 (2017-07-10 11:54:41+00:00): In the Beauce area many localities were tagged as towns while their size and population didn't seem to warrant it. They are more of the size of a village. I tried to bring the area more in line with the rest of Quebec. I didn't find any hard rule for this, so there is grey areas for sure. 
For me Saint-George is certainly a town, Beaceville also. However Saint-Ludger seems to be much smaller and better classified as a village. Towns should have a few large stores such as Canadian Tire, IGA, etc. and offer regional services. Villages a few smaller shops. Lastly hamlets are much smaller and usually no store or just a gas station and a dépanneur. 
Hope it makes sense to you.
One last note however, the Village tag has also been used a lot to tag rural municipalities even if they do not have a village center per say - I didn't change that information convention. There are many of those.
nammala (2017-07-10 12:44:15+00:00): Thanks Martin for getting back
Robert Whittaker (2017-08-31 11:53:23+00:00): In this changeset, the designation of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376088001 was changed to "restricted_bridleway". This isn't a class of Public Right of Way, so should it be either "restricted_byway" or "public_bridleway"?
daveemtb (2017-08-31 12:08:30+00:00): Good spot - should be restricted_byway, as per changeset title. Have now fixed! Thanks.
pyram (2017-08-07 20:19:21+00:00): Thank you for helping, but I think there are some Problems with that street:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4758856
Is it really no oneway on both sides? And there are some missing connections (and overlapping highways) like here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1815182862
highflyer74 (2017-07-10 10:12:27+00:00): Moin nochmal!

Dein Mapping Elan ist gut, und wir brauchen Leute wie Dich, aber: geh' mal kurz auf die Bremse. Schau Dir mal dies an https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27516360. source=Google ist bei OSM nicht erlaubt und kann rechtliche Probleme für OSM nach sich ziehen. Google ist keine erlaubte Quelle. Bitte beachte dies und entferne die von Dir auf Google Basis hinzugefügten Elemente wieder.

Ich schicke Dir nachher die angekündigten Links mit Lesematerial zu OSM.
highflyer74 (2017-07-10 10:15:13+00:00): Desweiteren sei bitte etwas genauer, wenn es um die Beschreibung Deiner Changesets geht. "Details hinzugefügt und falsche Dinge korrekt gestellt." ist nicht ausreichend. Schreibe bitte konkret, was Du geändert hast. Siehe dazu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Alexander-II (2017-07-09 11:33:50+00:00): Здравствуйте. Зачем вы вешаете bicycle=dismount на https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506138780/history ? Там установлен знак, предписывающий спешиться для передвижения с велосипедом?
Wladich (2017-07-09 11:44:16+00:00): В ботсаду почти все дорожки были с этим тегом: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/9184851#map=14/55.8401/37.6062&layers=N

Указанная вами дорожка появилась как результат разделения старой, тег снимать не стал. На новых я тег не вешаю.
Alexander-II (2017-07-09 11:48:10+00:00): Спасибо за ответ. Тег этот там не нужен, сейчас таких запретом там нет. Я его убрал с дорожек.
Carnildo (2017-07-09 08:52:05+00:00): I'm pretty sure this rest area is already mapped, about a half-mile north of where you've put it.
pluton_od (2017-07-11 04:19:07+00:00): Hi Carnildo. Thanks, you're right.
Spanholz (2017-08-23 12:41:39+00:00): Hey,

I saw you added a lot of sidewalks here. But can you please connect them with the streets? Else they are useless for routing. See this example:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=mapzen_foot&route=40.00321%2C-105.25164%3B40.00519%2C-105.25039#map=18/40.00397/-105.25107
MattSidor (2017-08-23 17:44:07+00:00): Thanks for bringing this to my attention, Spanholz. Let me look a little further into this to see if I can find other discussions on the best practice for this scenario. I had assumed that connecting them to the streets at the crosswalks would be sufficient. If changes are warranted, I'll go through all the sidewalks I've added and connect them up.
Spanholz (2017-08-23 18:52:59+00:00): I've changed some streets at 35th Street/Aurora Avenue, which would fix the problem. 

Have a look at some cool sites, where your changes will appear: https://www.reddit.com/r/openstreetmap/comments/6isju5/openstreetmap_websitesapps_to_share/

Have fun mapping!
GerdP (2017-10-16 13:10:07+00:00): Hi!
What does the rarely used highway=historic mean on these two ways?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506142967
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506142970
Maybe you want to express that the ways are no longer usable? 
Please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix for better tags.
Or maybe it is a historic=way ?
Dyserth (2017-10-16 20:50:20+00:00): It means it used to be a track road in the past, with a ford across the stream, but isn't any more having fallen into disuse for general traffic and now being sited on private land. The route could still be used for foot traffic but has restricted access.
GerdP (2017-10-16 21:13:09+00:00): OK, so you think the owners still use if for walking? In that case it would be a highway=footway + access=private
or maybe hw=path, right?
Dyserth (2017-10-17 08:24:19+00:00): No that is not what I meant - it *could* be used for walking down but is unsuitable for vehicles or horses but there are no rights of access. This was originally an old holloway road - hence the historic tag.
GerdP (2017-10-17 08:39:00+00:00): Since you don't seem to use one of the common prefixes to express this 
what about historic=way? This is used far more often than highway=historic.
Dyserth (2017-10-17 12:04:27+00:00): Less common it may be but is it more appropriate in this case? I feel that the highway=historic tag *is* more appropriate as this is what this road used to be. A road. A highway. Not a path or a way.
GerdP (2017-10-17 13:32:40+00:00): OK, maybe my understanding is too poor. I've asked the UK forum for help
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=668571#p668571
Richard (2017-10-18 14:29:55+00:00): historic:highway=* would be much better than highway=historic. Generally the key should reflect what it is, not what it used to be. It is a historic highway but it's not a highway. 

taginfo reports 1,200 historic:highway=* vs just 6 highway=historic.

(railway=abandoned/dismantled is kind of grandfathered in but not a good example to follow!)
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-19 06:35:43+00:00): > No that is not what I meant - it *could* be used for walking down but is unsuitable for vehicles or horses but there are no rights of access

So why highway=footway is unsuitable?
Dyserth (2017-10-19 18:20:40+00:00): re Comment from Richard. That seems spot on - it is indeed a historic highway but not a highway currently. I'll amend the tagging. Cheers.
Dyserth (2017-10-19 18:24:39+00:00): highway=footway is unsuitable because it isn't a designated footway any more than the rest of the fields which the feature crosses. The feature is similar in nature to a classic holloway or sunken lane. For examples of similar features please see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunken_lane.
Dyserth (2017-10-19 18:28:54+00:00): as an aside this feature was marked as a unclassified road on the OS 1:25k 1st Series 1937 Map.
iandees (2017-07-09 13:58:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding to OSM, but it looks like the street grid you added doesn't exist. I'm going to revert this change, but feel free to continue contributing real data to OSM that you see in the real world.
vramirez122000 (2017-07-11 13:02:45+00:00): Roosevelt Roads in Ceiba, Puerto Rico is no longer a naval base. I will remove it as soon as possible
Basstoelpel (2019-02-03 13:30:18+00:00): Can you please explain why you think this is the Mudi dam?
mrlanduse (2018-05-01 10:16:02+00:00): Hi tommy,

plesae make sure, that you merge your tags into any existing dam geometries. For example at Manatali barrage you've imported a dam (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506146312) over the existing geometry (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190325901) which was of higher quality.

I really like it when good data is imported, but when the import is done technically bad, I will remove it!

See also at the import from bsmith54: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49931700
Basstoelpel (2019-02-07 21:08:52+00:00): Have any of these imports been discussed?
user_5359 (2017-07-09 16:49:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Service every day?
user_5359 (2017-07-09 16:55:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I see a pond nearby but no hills in the arial images. Which height has your waterfall?
oormilavinod (2017-07-10 05:32:19+00:00): hey jeffreyamyjo savunen welcome to OSM could you please clarify if there is a waterfall in that place i dont see any elevated region . happy mapping
Yotsawan Chaiyana (2017-07-09 04:43:42+00:00): u
Rom1 (2017-07-16 17:26:02+00:00): Bonjour, sans vouloir te décourager, s'il te plaît arrête de multiplier les "landuse=residential". Un seul suffit quand les éléments sont contigus. Merci.
Romain
chnav (2017-08-02 06:56:10+00:00): Hi, M36 in reconstruction, only one side is ready, speed limits all the way. It is not motorway yet except few parts. I revert it back o trunk. See video report https://www.drive2.ru/l/479388170295705972/ clip #11
chnav (2017-08-02 07:18:03+00:00): Please do not change trunks to motorways without knowledge on the ground. I spent days to find locations of road signs and highways' status.
AkuAnakTimur (2017-07-09 06:28:41+00:00): Hi, thanks for your effort on naming these peaks. I'd like to know whether permission is given to put those here - because, copyright stuff and all that.
DenisOakley (2017-07-09 08:24:41+00:00): Good point. I got the information from here
http://www.peninsularmalaysiapeaks.com/p/master-list.html which is non-copyrighted (or doesn't claim copyright). 
He states that:
"Notes:
- Peak names and elevations obtained from the Department of Survey and Mapping topographic maps
- Coordinates are approximates based on the georeferenced topographic maps (possible deviation to within 10s of metres)
- Elevation of 'other peaks' rounded up to the lower 100m contour line
- Land status can change depending on whether it has been subsequently gazetted/degazetted by the state".

What should we do next?
AkuAnakTimur (2017-07-09 12:56:53+00:00): I'm afraid the topographic maps from the Department of Survey and Mapping is definitely copyrighted.


Probably a bit of good news: the coordinates of these peaks were derived indirectly from OpenCycleMap's contour lines (Thunderforest Landscape). I'd be fine with the location of the peaks.


Sadly, at this point, the names (and any other data) would have to be removed, unless (1) a similiar but compatible open data is available, or (2) laborious, time-consuming on-the-ground verification is made base on that list.


I understand that it's totally unpleasant, but at least your edits will not forcibly removed due to a copyright claim.
AkuAnakTimur (2017-07-09 13:07:07+00:00): But, as an alternative for (1), please read this diary entry: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Jothirnadh/diary/36793


The same database has names for geographical features, but beware: their position might be off its real position and probably using unconventional spellings.


Well, send me a message if you are interested.
DenisOakley (2017-07-10 12:28:14+00:00): Yes. I will do that it may be a few days
Also planning to do some ground surveys to verify - https://www.facebook.com/TigerTrailOrg/. I would also love to ask you a lot of questions about mapping in Malaysia and how I can do it better if you have time. Is this the best place for that