piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Matthieu Gaillet (2020-08-05 15:45:16+00:00): Cher Dominique, je suis bien au courant (et pour cause) de vos efforts pour faire reconnaître les sentiers communaux, mais en l'occurence je pense que mapper des sentiers qui sont (malheureusement) absolument inexistants sur le terrains et pourraient induire en erreur les usagers. Cela va à l'encontre des règles de base d'édition d'OSM (cf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability). De ce fait, je vous propose de faire un revert. Qu'en pensez-vous ?
freeExec (2020-08-04 17:07:52+00:00): Почему вышло amenity в amenity
eggie (2020-08-04 12:23:57+00:00): Dag dhoek.. Probeer in één keer op de adresnode bij te taggen svp. Dus niet zelf nog een keer een adres aanmaken.
De info heb ik samengevoegd. 
MVG,
Eggie
RicoElectrico (2020-08-05 22:07:59+00:00): Hi, it should be "Wiosny Ludów", just like the other segments. I fixed that.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic for reference (in Polish)
EneaSuper (2020-08-05 13:51:19+00:00): Credo sia il caso di mappare Via Guido Rossa anche come ponte ad area. Eventualmente ci risentiamo nei prossimi giorni, così ti spiego meglio.
Anil Basnet (2020-08-12 05:07:26+00:00): Please be sure while providing tags to the highways while mapping remotely. You have tagged track road having ground surface as primary highway. That's completely wrong.

Please read this wiki carefully. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nepal/Roads
Cucazer (2020-08-06 19:17:21+00:00): The corners of buildings are typically exactly 90 degrees. Unfortunately, it is pretty hard to achieve such result manually. There exists an option in iD editor to square a single corner (point) or complete building (area) by right-clicking an object and selecting according entry. Unfortunately, some manual correction and repeated squaring operation are often required.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88928411
pio2_122 (2020-08-04 13:28:54+00:00): Moim zdaniem nie pasuje do tego tag place=locality - raczej służy on do oznaczanie miejsc z powszechnie używaną nazwą. "Zapasowe stanowisko ogniowe (ZSO) dywizjonów rakietowych OP" z pewnością taką nie jest.

"Nie stosuje się go również dla nazwania obiektów już opisanych w OSM - dla nich nazwę umieścić należy w znaczniku name=*.
Np. w przypadku jeziora nazwę należy dodać do obiektu natural=water + water=lake, reprezentującego jezioro, a nie jako punkt locality umieszczony na jeziorze." 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:place=locality?uselang=pl

Lepiej użyć czegoś z https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:military (można też dodać nową wartość military=*)
Cucazer (2020-08-06 19:16:58+00:00): The corners of buildings are typically exactly 90 degrees. Unfortunately, it is pretty hard to achieve such result manually. There exists an option in iD editor to square a single corner (point) or complete building (area) by right-clicking an object and selecting according entry. Unfortunately, some manual correction and repeated squaring operation are often required.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/88928650
Sanniu (2020-08-06 06:36:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833845740 is now duplicates existing road and not connected, can you fix this, please?
eggie (2020-08-04 13:12:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Review.. wat is je bedoeling. mag janenalleman hier komen?  De poort stond op access=private en emergency=yes voor de hulpdiensten.
Het was dus juist getagd. 
De tagging was van de VRT zelf. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-08-04 13:18:04+00:00): Mike... access=permit is eigenlijk voor heel andere doeleinden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/access%3Dpermit

MVG,
Eggie
Mike1999w (2020-08-04 13:30:00+00:00): Ja excuses, ik zie inderdaad nu dat hulpdiensten op ''Yes'' staat.
mueschel (2020-08-09 09:55:13+00:00): Hi,
'building:mind' sieht nach einem Tippfehler aus, schaust du mal nach?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/55977175
swiki (2020-08-09 10:51:10+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis; Fehler behoben
giggls (2020-08-05 08:15:27+00:00): Moin,

Du hast 3999393657 gelöscht aber nicht alle tags (tilets, shower, ...) hierher übertragen. Absicht oder Versehen?
abakus_uploader (2020-08-04 22:31:20+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mueschel (2020-08-08 12:20:20+00:00): Hi,
what does the tag 'total_distance = 15.9 км' on this short road mean? This is not used in other places.
utack (2020-10-24 18:12:22+00:00): Hi,  
  
you've converted two nodes on the cycle route to "barrier=gate"  
Do you happen to know the access properties as well?  
Can bicycle=yes or even access=yes be added maybe?  
  
Thank you
utack (2020-10-24 18:12:54+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1935574645

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1935574645
TaraV (2020-10-26 16:15:59+00:00): Hi!
Barriers are visible on Esri and Bing, and also there is an image, https://openstreetcam.org/details/1388066/68/track-info that has a larger gate for regular vehicles, but also a smaller white barrier, a little more to the left, with two blue signs. Based on this (http://www.trailadventures.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/9-Lake-Tekapo-to-Twizel.pdf) and that OSC imagery it seems that bicycles and pedestrians can access it. Hope this helps. 
Thanks!
Janjko (2020-10-30 21:34:11+00:00): Pozdrav! 
Vidim da u zadnje vrijeme puno mapiraš, i to je super. Ali trebali bi malo uskladiti mapiranje, da si ne gazimo po prstima. Što se tiče mapiranja bus linija, vidim da mjenjaš nazive relacija iz Bus 143: u ZET 143: . To nam kvari naš projekt u kojem pokušavamo sve Bus linije  nazivati na isti način. Pogledaj ovaj web: https://triglav.bezdomni.net/zet/routes
Tu vodimo evidenciju stanje ruta, pa smo tako vidjeli da radiš ove promjene. Javi nam se na telegram, kanal @osmhr da se bolje uskladimo. Pozdrav!
smaprs (2020-10-18 19:35:06+00:00): Hi, please, is this area  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833865217/history  
realy a huge residential area?  
In OSM "residential" should fit to the limits of a cluster of houses.  
If it is for an administrative area like a municipality, one should use  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:admin_level  
and  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative  
Also many other areas similar by the Red Sea.  
Was that the case?  
Best regards, Sergio.
salma_z (2020-10-20 17:07:38+00:00): Thank you for finding this and this boundary has been fixed
map per (2021-03-29 16:20:52+00:00): The area wasn't fixed. The huge area is still tagged with landuse=residential (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833865217).
smaprs (2021-03-29 16:38:05+00:00): Thank you, considering that, the  landuse=residential could be removed, for further geometry correction (or even susbtitue it for a single point, if the locality can be found), keeping the remaining tags. Feel free to do it (otherwise I can do it another day.)
salma_z (2021-03-30 12:34:39+00:00): Hi,
All the land use like these will be reviewed in the next few days, our team has put this in the schedule, so sorry for being late.
Frans S (2020-08-04 14:29:09+00:00): Hello Yoonie
Thanks for mapping here.
Please square each rectangular building with the Q key in the editor.
Pay also attention on the Issue triangle on the right hand menu and solve the issues.
I copy you a few advises how to improve your mappings
Best regards
user_242798 (2020-08-04 14:34:16+00:00): Changeset Comment is:
Weerribben OSM_Project (13): Water area inside water area, Overlapping landuse/natural, Forest or Water, Water (BGT), Multipolygons, {landuse=grass} > [natural=wetland, fen]; Conflicting tags (landuse and natural) > [natural=*]
JOSM bug(?):
Upload has full Changeset Comment, Close will close "We"...
Frans S (2020-08-06 13:12:36+00:00): Hello Yoonie
Thank you so much for mapping on this project.
A request.
Please map more accurate and follow all the outlines of the buiildings you map and square the rectangular buildings
I copy you advises in a PM to you
Best regards and keep mapping
Fasse (2020-08-05 19:21:00+00:00): Hmm, meiner Meinung nach gehört das schon zum Wohngebiet, es ist der Garten von den beiden Häusern. Wenn man deinen Ansatz konsequent weiterverfolgen würde, müsste man jetzt jede Gartenwiese als "grass" hinterlegen und jede Baumgruppe im Garten als "wood".
Jonathan Haas (2020-08-06 06:28:26+00:00): Ist halt auslegungssache, bei einem einzelnen Haus, das von einer großen Grasfläche umgeben ist und dass jetzt nicht unbedingt in einem Wohngebiet liegt würde man die Grasfläche vermutlich sehr wohl taggen.

Mein Grund für die Änderung ist jedenfalls dass Hausnummer 76 gefühlt nicht wirklich zum Wohngebiet gehört (siehe z. B. lange Zufahrt über Niederforstbacher Straße) und dass die Gartenfläche für die Wohngebiet-Verhätnisse sehr groß wäre.

Letztendlich ist es auch eine Detailfrage. Irgendwer hat hier in der Nähe jede Hundehütte und jeden kleinen Teich gemappt, dann kann man m. M. n. genauso gut den kleinen "Garten-Wald" mappen.

Wenn man die Beckerstraße abwährts geht, sieht es auf der rechten Seite jedenfalls deutlich eher nach Wald aus als nach Wohngebiet.
Jonathan Haas (2020-08-06 06:36:27+00:00): Ich würde mir das jedenfalls nach Fertigstellung Tuchmacherviertel nochmal angucken, und wenn dann das Haus mehr ins Wohngebiet integriert ist würde ich das natürlich wieder integrieren. Aber wenn du meinst dass meine Änderung falsch war mach ich die auch gerne wieder rückgängig.
Fasse (2020-08-13 06:23:44+00:00): Ich verstehe deinen Ansatz. Wahrscheinlich ist es in diesem Fall wirklich ein Graubereich. Ich denke, dass die beiden Häuser einen großen Garten haben, da wohnt ja auch die Familie Becker, der mal die "Tuchfabrik" gehört hat. Für mich geht jetzt auch nicht die Welt unter, wenn es so bleibt.
zyphlar (2020-08-05 06:57:18+00:00): looks ok! minor edits to make stuff match the satellite aren't super important but your contrbutions are appreciated. one tip is avoid making many edits over a wide area in one changeset if you can avoid it, since it will draw changeset boxes across entire cities and no one editor will have local knowledge of all those areas.
trigpoint (2020-08-05 14:52:37+00:00): Hi
Much of the railway you have added as railway=abandoned is through cropped fields and isn't actually recognisable as a former railway.
using railway=razed would be a far more accurate tag to use.
What source did you use?

Cheers Phil
Ashimema (2020-08-12 08:22:13+00:00): Hi Phil, 

I used a few sources.. seems I forgot to add them this this changeset :(.

https://colonelstephenssociety.co.uk/the%20colonels%20railways/shropshire%20%26%20montgomeryshire%20light%20railway/index.html was helpful to understand where the railway used to stop, then a mix of local survey and satellite images.

I used abandoned so that it wouldn't appear on the map and was more of a record of where the railway used to run. It would be great to switch to razed where there is still traces of it, but without a ground survey of those area's I wasn't confident in doing that.  I'm interested to see how historical mapping works in OSM, so this was a first foray into that.
eggie (2020-08-04 15:27:18+00:00): Dag Yantri,

Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot. Beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmosus. Dit heeft vaak onbedoelde verplaatsingen van objecten tot gevolg.
Verder is landuse=retail.. Door het verwijderen vanbuilding=yes heb je ook het gebouw verwijderd van de kaart. 
Je edits http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88935997
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-08-04 15:35:19+00:00): Gebouw hersteld. Info samengevoegd met adresnode
eggie (2020-08-04 15:40:03+00:00): fixed opening hours
yantri (2020-08-04 15:40:05+00:00): Hi Eggie,
Thank you for your findings and tips on how to improve my editing. They're extremely helpful. I must have missed the building removal. Happy you've noticed!
Regards,
yantri
eggie (2020-08-04 15:48:40+00:00): No problem.. I also changed the tag florist into garden_centre according your description info and website

 
You agree? 

Have fun with mapping
Eggie
yantri (2020-08-04 15:54:36+00:00): That's a more proper tag, I agree. :)

Thanks and have a nice mapping too!
yantri
user_5359 (2020-08-04 17:18:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please describe better, what you changed.
ElliottPlack (2020-08-20 16:47:04+00:00): Hi Karl, and welcome to the project. OSM does not recognize Census Designated Places as boundaries in the project. Originally, TIGER boundaries were imported in an effort to get boundaries into the map when starting from scratch. However, CDPs (which change often and have no legal definition) are not desirable in the map. Further, it against OSM rules to import these boundaries from a county GIS source without prior permission from the OSM community. Please refrain from adding these boundaries until reviewing the OSM import guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

More on CDP:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dcensus
Karl Gordon (2020-08-24 13:45:53+00:00): Thank you for the feedback.  

I contacted the Baltimore County GIS and they pointed me to the CDP files as the official boundaries of Baltimore County towns.  I was explicit that I wanted to use these for OpenStreetMap.  I did review the license with the Baltimore County CDP source and it certainly made no use restrictions and looked to be fully compatible with OSM use.  

I didn't directly import the CDP boundaries, but used them to guide setting the boundaries based on existing ways (expect when this was not possible - very rare).  I followed guidance given by another OSM editor with the same interests as I - specifically adding boundaries to OSM so that these boundaries could be used by citystrides.com.

Is the appropriate way to include CDP boundaries is by tagging them as "census" instead of "administrative"?  If so, what is the appropriate admin_level? 

I do feel it is quite useful to have these boundaries in OSM and would like to learn how to fix existing such boundaries I've already added and add additional ones correctly.  As I am not directly importing the CDP boundaries, but instead am using them as guidance, it is not clear to me if the import guidelines apply.  I'm certainly willing to follow those guidelines, just making sure what the best way forward is in this case.

BTW, I have joined the OSM slack group and a few of the channels - including #bounders, in case that is a better place for such communications.

Thanks in advance for any guidance/advice.  Much appreciated.
eggie (2020-08-04 15:28:50+00:00): Tip.. Maak gebruik van de bestaande adresnode.. Dus niet zelf nog een keer een adres aanmaken. Nu zijn er twee.
Je edit http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88936508
MVG,
Eggie
yantri (2020-08-04 15:52:56+00:00): Hi Eggie,
Thank you for the tip. I would like to fix it (to move the data to the earlier address point), is it possible?
Regards,
yantri
eggie (2020-08-04 16:58:51+00:00): Up to you!
user_5359 (2022-01-29 07:13:27+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/130206936/history. What is the meaning of the tag yes = designated ?
JassKurn (2022-01-29 11:16:27+00:00): Thankyou. The tagging is wrong, and a blunder. I've  have deleted the tag in a changeset which should show in your given way history link
canfe (2020-11-29 17:10:35+00:00): Ma il name è davvero:
tracciato dell'acquedotto Carolino e via Francigena del sud
a me sembra più una description
VictorIE (2024-04-23 22:21:35+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301158276/history

ref=The Haunted Road

Perhaps loc_name=The Haunted Road instead?
user_5359 (2020-08-05 04:36:42+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I revert your edit becaus a tree isn't a building.
BER319 (2020-08-16 17:18:12+00:00): Hallo Mehl42,

wie kommst du hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24305963
auf den Namen Fußweg nach Wilhelmshagen? Wo steht dazu ein Schild welches diesem eg den Namen gibt. Ich denke das ist frei erfunden und gehört nicht in die Karte.

Viele Grüße
BER319
Mehl42 (2020-08-17 06:50:46+00:00): Dieser Fußweg wurde 1908 zusammen mit dem Tunnel am Bhf Wilhelmshagen vom Grundbesitzerverein in Schönblick finanziert. Er wurde von Anfang an so genannt. Ein Schild besteht allerdings nicht. 
Haselberger 1931, S. 101/2.
BER319 (2020-09-02 05:47:01+00:00): Hallo Mehl42,
bitte beachte das diese Quelle "Haselberger 1931, S. 101/2" bestimmt nicht mit den Lizenzbestimmungen von OSM vereinbar ist.
Wir erfassen nur, was vor Ort sichtbar (Schilder) ist oder aus zugelassenen Quellen stammt. Bitte schaue einmal im WIKI und im Forum nach dort wurde das schon oft diskutiert. 
Viele Grüße
BER319
Riemer17 (2020-08-04 18:06:16+00:00): Cartesius 2 verhuisd naar Zeeburgereiland en de naam verandert naar Alasca
user_2066394 (2020-08-04 23:33:06+00:00): Eigentümer-Wechsel/Namensänderung ist unproblematisch, aber die Tram-Linie hat es dir ordentlich verzogen.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=88938998
ToniE (2020-08-05 11:00:23+00:00): Ist korrigiert.
user_8334278 (2020-08-04 16:29:11+00:00): it flooded, rained, it is a dry hole.
gileri (2020-08-04 18:04:03+00:00): Bonjour, le fleuriste n'existe plus à cet endroit ?
Charles de Lacombe (2020-08-04 18:36:39+00:00): Désolé, la modification n'est pas très précise parce que je suis passé par StreetComplete. En réalité il y a deux pas de porte pour le bâtiment : un consultant immobilier (à la place du fleuriste), et une boutique papeterie/librairie/journaux
gileri (2020-08-04 18:43:58+00:00): Pas de problème ! Si vous pouvez mettre les deux commerces c'est le mieux je pense vu que vous savez où ils sont placés, mais sinon je m'en chargerais.

Bonne soirée !
Anil Basnet (2020-09-07 10:29:55+00:00): River was overlapped with existing river. Be careful while mapping mass objects.
Frans S (2020-08-07 13:11:32+00:00): Hello. Thank you so much for mapping on this project,
unfortunately your mappings are not that accurate and squared as HOT might expect. None of your mappings comply to those

I copy you some advises how to improve your mapping skills
eggie (2020-08-04 18:10:48+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review 

name=Doctorandus den Uyllaan beter verwijderen. Een glasbak hort geen adres te hebben.
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse (2020-09-20 00:37:06+00:00): In this changeset you've replaced https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/672947723/history with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/833937426 , which has much less information on it.  Can you explain why you have done this?  The same question was asked on https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/58856461 , and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/62559454 , and https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/60252050 was a similar problem too.
Best Regards,
Andy
user_5359 (2020-08-04 18:04:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Thank you for adding the house number: Short hint: The house number isn’t the name of a building.
user_5359 (2020-08-04 18:12:34+00:00): Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/833938954, https://www.osm.org/way/833938950 , https://www.osm.org/way/833938947 , https://www.osm.org/way/833938953. All buildings have the house number 3647.
eggie (2020-08-04 18:16:12+00:00): Please don't add info on the map that is already there, I will delete your contribution.
Greetz,
eggie
AgusQui (2020-08-18 17:33:20+00:00): Hola, dibujaste los edificios de los puestos policiales en Gral Paz y L de Vega, esta muy bien, pero al ponerles amenity=police y dejar los nodos amenity=police que ya estaban se duplicaron los puestos policiales. Para la proxima tenes 2 opciones: dibujar el edificio sin tag adicional, o pasar todos los datos del nodo al edificio y borrar el nodo.
fazzyp (2020-08-05 06:53:33+00:00): Zdravim,
vzhledem k tomu, ze vetsina chodniku je primo u cesty/silnice - nebylo by na zvazeni (nez vytvaret pro kazdy chodnik extra cestu) je oznacit tagem sidewalk=yes(left/right) primo na ulici? Petr F.
Jiri Podhorecky (2020-08-05 11:04:14+00:00): Možné to je asi obojím způsobem. Viděl jsem např. ve velkých zahraničních městech, že tam jsou chodníky vykreslovány zvlášť. Proto jsem chodníky kreslil tam, kde mi v reálu přišly dostatečně patrné.
fazzyp (2020-08-05 13:21:10+00:00): Zalezi na meste nu, nekde to maji tak, jinde onak - kdyz uz jsou jednou zakresleny, tak proc ne. Jen jsem myslel, ze by to usetrilo praci, kdyz uz stejne tim kterym smerem jedna cesta vede :-)
fazzyp (2020-08-05 13:35:25+00:00): Napriklad v nemeckem Rezne nebo Mnichove, maji zakreslene povetsinou jen chodniky, ktere se odchyluji od trasy silnice. Pro najiti spravne cesty to postaci a mapa zaroven nepusobi "preplacane". Nicmene dovolene jsou dle wiki oba zpusoby. Petr F.
comfyquiettree (2020-08-05 13:59:50+00:00): Osobně se přikláním spíše k tomu abychom je ponechali, sice pak default render vypadá ošklivěji, ale když je takto máme zakreslené tak mi přijde že bychom zbytečně mazali info, které už někdo zadal. Navíc mi přijde že za cenu přehlednosti v mapě, budou více nepřehledné tagy u silnic.

Samozřejmě, ale záleží na ostatních :), musíme ale po úpravách dávat pozor abychom v mapě neměli dupliknatní info (např. tady byl chodník nakreslen vedle a a na silnici byl pak tag sidewalk=both, což je samozřejmě špatně).
Aurimas Fišeras (2022-10-13 08:04:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2058206649/history – ar tikrai čia tiltas?
Pagal Mapillary nuotrauką ten tik pralaida:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=55.243113888889&lng=25.098172222222&z=17&pKey=870132757047464&focus=photo&x=0.4359022059512304&y=0.7610166943264046&zoom=1.5853200188369612

Geoportal.lt žemėlapis taip pat čia nerodo tilto.
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-13 10:03:37+00:00): Mes čia plaukėm baidarėm šį rugpjūtį. Tiksliau čia išlipom. Siesartis ten gan platus, kokie 5-10 metrų. Tai abejoju, ar galima būtų pavadinti „pralaida“...
Aurimas Fišeras (2022-10-13 10:08:51+00:00): Tai tada tunelis?
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-13 11:08:49+00:00): Mano galva tiltas. Na tik tarp kelio ir krašto pakankamai daug žemės/žolės. Paklausiu kolegų, gal kas padarė nuotrauką, kurioje matosi, kaip Siesartis po apačia prateka. Ten nu niekaip nebus tunelio/pralaidos.
Aurimas Fišeras (2022-10-14 17:17:49+00:00): Tikrai ne tiltas, nes ant asfalto nėra tilto plėtimosi jungčių.

Google rasta nuotrauka rodo žemą, plačią pralaidą:
https://goo.gl/maps/M7Zp9GvpwdzAf4K8A

Pagal Tag:tunnel=culvert aprašymą nereiškia, kad tai turi būti nedidelio diametro, nepraplaukiamas vamzdis.

Todėl turėtų būti:
waterway=river
layer=-1
tunnel=culvert
boat=yes
width=(pagal nuotrauką ~1,7 baidarių ilgis, turbūt ~8m)

Taginfo rodo ~91k waterway=river + tunnel=culvert kombinacijų.
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-15 07:46:25+00:00): Na man tai į pralaidą šita vieta nu niekaip nepanaši. Na bet jei tau taip labai reikia - tai keisk :-) Reikės tada žiūrėti, ar nesigadina baidarių maršrutizavimas, nes per pralaidas tikrai baidarės neplaukioja :-D
Beje boat=yes reiškia, kad ten pagal įstatymus galima plaukti laivu, ne apie tai, praplaukiama ten ar nepraplaukiama. T.y. kai kurios upių kelių vietos gali būti boat=no, kur laivas (na ar baidarė) gal ir praplauktų, bet to daryti negalima pagal įstatymus (pvz. yra atitinkami draudžiamieji ženklai).
Aurimas Fišeras (2022-10-15 08:21:22+00:00): Man nereikia neegzistuojančio tilto ;)

Kaip tada toks variantas?
layer=-1
tunnel=yes
waterway=river
width=8
JOSM validatorius prie tokio žymėjimo nesikabina.

Baidarės per tunelius plaukioja, maršrutizuojasi?