piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2016-11-01 07:44:38+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-03 19:08:07+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 13:44:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-01 07:45:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your node please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility .
user_5359 (2016-11-01 13:45:24+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:30:09+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:14:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mathieuS (2016-11-16 08:34:25+00:00): Un chemin (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450539745) ne peut pas porter un tag de surface. En l'occurrence, il fait partie d'un multipolygone définissant la surface, donc j'ai simplement supprimé le tag incriminé.

De manière générale, pour représenter les petites surfaces, il est recommandé d'utiliser des chemins fermés plutôt que des mutlipolygones (plus complexes à gérer, surtout pour les débutants). Il est alors tout à fait correcte de dupliquer les portions de chemins que les surfaces contigües partagent.
mathieuS (2016-11-16 08:37:20+00:00): La densité de nœuds sur certains chemins que vous avez créé parait trop élevée. (L'éditeur JOSM permet facilement de simplifier les chemins en réduisant le nombre de nœuds).
Sarge 2000 (2016-11-16 08:47:41+00:00): Hello mathieuS,
Je ne comprends pas de quel tag tu parle, a ce que j'ai vu tu a supprimer le tag created_by qui n'est pas un tag de surface ..., j'imagine que j'ai mal vu...
Sarge 2000 (2016-11-16 08:49:14+00:00): Pour la densité de points j'avais lu je ne sait plus ou que ce n'étais pas forcement préconisé de simplifier les chemins, cela dit je n'ai rien coutre car effectivement la densité est très élevée :-)
mathieuS (2016-11-16 09:21:35+00:00): Si tu regardes l'historique du chemin (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/450539745/history), tu verras que la version 1 contient un tag landuse.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 13:56:36+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:31:49+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
tyr_asd (2016-11-01 10:53:40+00:00): Ciao spietsnaz. Grazie per aggiungere i nomi italiani! Una richiesta: Puoi anche compilare i campi per i nomi nelle linuge indivuduali (come in questo screenshot: https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8645/16843583062_c042a6f06e_z_d.jpg )? Grazie!
Akrimullah (2021-09-29 07:59:20+00:00): halo kang Jusrianto,
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/450543836, data building d area ini banyak dengan name=rumah warga. apa bisa d hapus saja kang, punten. ?? di pedoman wiki tidak disarankan menggunakan tag seperti itu kecuali memang ada nama spesifik yang merepresentasikan 1 bangunan tertentu. makasih
scai (2016-11-01 17:08:32+00:00): Das sind doch nicht die offiziellen Namen der Parkplätze was als Name eingetragen wurde, oder?
gmbo (2016-11-02 06:42:54+00:00): Das waren die Namen die mir angegeben wurden, 
Ein Namensschild wird da nicht stehen.
werde sie mal als alt_name umtaggen.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 14:09:05+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:33:40+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 14:09:39+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:35:09+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
gileri (2016-11-01 10:16:17+00:00): source=survey;Mapillary;Bing
user_5359 (2016-11-01 14:10:25+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:35:44+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
gileri (2016-11-01 10:15:59+00:00): source=Bing;Cadastre
user_5359 (2016-11-01 14:11:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:36:22+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Alecs01 (2016-11-01 13:41:51+00:00): Grazie, ma lo hai aggiunto due volte, ne ho tenuto uno solo in corrispondenza del numero civico che c'era già
gileri (2016-11-01 10:15:48+00:00): source=Bing
mavl (2019-01-13 17:14:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-01-13 17:14:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 14:27:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:37:39+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 14:27:45+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:38:22+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
andygol (2016-11-01 22:40:11+00:00): Доброго дня, Maxim Avdeev.

Я спостерігаю за вашими правками вже деякий час. Вимушений скасувати цей набір правок.

- Не треба розділяти дорогу на дві лінії - оскільки немає фізичного розділювача між ними. 

- Не треба змінювати клас (тип) дороги - вона бере на себе лише локальний трафік. 

Лінія дороги входить до складу кількох зв'язків, і розділивши її ви їх поламали та не внесли до них відповідних виправлень.

Якщо у вас виникають питання щодо позначення об'єктів в ОСМ, використання теґів – ви завжди можете задати їх на форумі - https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=40

PS. Прохання додавати змістовні коментарі до ваших наборів правок.
user_5359 (2016-11-02 19:02:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:38:58+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Jeroen Muris (2016-11-04 17:09:03+00:00): Dank je wel; dat is snel. Ik was nog tracks aan het verzamelen...
user_5359 (2016-11-01 15:08:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:39:37+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 15:09:01+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:40:16+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Fragwyz (2016-11-01 12:03:36+00:00): Doh accidentally saved with the wrong description: this added a missing footpath
SomeoneElse (2016-11-01 16:55:47+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.  Please don't add fantasy data anywhere, even in the middle of the Antarctic.  OpenStreetMap is about the real world as it exists; not a playground
Please do continue adding data to OSM, but only things that actually exist in the real world.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group.
Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap. Пожалуйста, не добавляйте фантазии данные в любом месте, даже в середине Антарктики. OpenStreetMap о реальном мире, как она существует; не детская площадка
Пожалуйста, продолжить добавление данных в OSM, но только то, что на самом деле существуют в реальном мире.
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Энди Таунсенд, от имени Рабочей группы данных OpenStreetMap в.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 15:12:44+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:41:05+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 15:14:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:42:21+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
maraf24 (2016-11-06 11:33:53+00:00): Proszę podać źródło wskazujące, że prace budowlane się rozpoczęły.
SlaHar (2016-11-06 11:37:39+00:00): http://investmap.pl/watek/wroclaw-ul-wojanowska-rozbudowa,10631/3

http://wroclaw.onet.pl/buduja-lacznik-miedzy-nowym-szpitalem-a-stablowicami/qlpr7x
maraf24 (2016-11-06 19:06:43+00:00): Dzięki.
Allroads (2016-11-01 12:54:10+00:00): Parking is controlled by access key and not by name, there is not a sign with this name, Parkeren School, as example, there more and this name is not in the source data of the import. You only take the name key to get it visible on www.openstreetmap.org/ map, this is a abuse of the name key. Probably also this way of tagging is other changesets.
user_5359 (2016-11-01 15:16:01+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:43:03+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
tuxayo (2019-04-24 12:55:37+00:00): Hi, should we move where the highway=bus_stop are?

For example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3464978093

Because it doesn't seems to be a valid position. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=bus_stop

«If you wish to map public_transport=stop_position, please tag that node on the road's way, not on the same node as highway=bus_stop. »

(from reading the rest of the page also)
tuxayo (2019-04-24 14:18:49+00:00): errata:

* should we move the highway=bus_stop where the platform is?
AlexThur (2016-11-01 13:18:27+00:00): #selfieless
bielebog (2016-11-02 20:49:39+00:00): Wie heißt denn die Bar? Das kannst Du mit name=* eintragen.
bielebog (2016-11-07 13:42:01+00:00): Hier ist keine Bar. Siehe https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/fblnajFyu9JzMGKEzVCavg
Kannst Du das bitte wieder löschen?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-23 09:59:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46332241 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in Argentina following discussion with someone from the Argentine community.  All attempts to contact the mapper have failed
user_5359 (2016-11-01 15:42:11+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:43:41+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
AlexThur (2016-11-01 13:35:06+00:00): #selfieless
jinalfoflia (2016-11-02 09:51:56+00:00): Hi RobbyB99,

Your mapping contributions are greatly appreciated. You have mentioned Google as the source. Can you please clarify in what context have you used Google?
You should not be using Google as a source of information for addition of any data on OSM. Look in here for more information - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F

Best,
 
Jinal Foflia
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-16 09:54:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46131853 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some partially Google-sourced edits
user_5359 (2016-11-01 15:38:51+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-04 16:45:17+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
literan (2016-11-02 10:58:49+00:00): я поправил на верный тег: amenity=recycling
recycling_type=container - хорошо бы еще узнать, какие именно отходы собирают там отдельно
SomeoneElse (2021-04-03 22:06:47+00:00): Re the Jorvic Way, this changeset added it going through the farmyard at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/377960435 (see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/15KI ), but it doesn't (that's clearly gated off from the west and marked as private).  Presumably it actually goes north of the sewage works, but I've never actually seen any Jorvic Way signage between Acaster Malbis and Clifton Bridge!
piligab (2016-11-30 21:46:08+00:00): Hi user3441:
Thank you for contributing to OSM.
Please, could indicate why he deleted tag "amenity" and added tag "waterway"?
user3441 (2016-12-01 11:07:31+00:00): Hi,
omg, definetely, I didn't do it with purpose. AFAIR, I only changed rating field. It's quite odd. I'll delete the tag.

P.S.: thanks for the notice, I was pleasantly surprised, usually other contributors use "strong language" by commenting my edits :*
user_5359 (2020-11-22 08:00:23+00:00): Please check the four nodes, I suspect that they are duplicates.
https://www.osm.org/node/4450577968
https://www.osm.org/node/4467097593
https://www.osm.org/node/4475178937
https://www.osm.org/node/4485704277
mavl (2016-11-01 17:48:28+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок вы назвали улицы просто «Берёзовая» и «Сосновая». Я дописал к этим названиям слово «улица». Надеюсь, вы не будете возражать. Это общероссийская практика [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог].
streckenkundler (2016-11-01 16:10:14+00:00): Hei, 

nur eine allgemeine Anmerkung.

Euch ist klar, daß der Bahnhof Cottbus derzeit umgebaut wird? Also Treppen, Tunnel, Fahrstühle, Bahnhofsvorplatz, Parkplätze, Straßenbahn, Gebäude...

Viele Dinge verändern sich und sind nach derzeitigem Stand nur sauber vor Ort zu recherchieren...

...nur so mal zur Info. Ich selbst bin i.d.R. nicht in Cottbus.

Sven
soemisch (2016-11-02 12:06:24+00:00): Sven, danke für den Hinweis. Wir haben mithilfe des Links das Bauvorhaben geprüft und festgestellt, dass es OSM nicht so sehr betrifft. Es werden Bahnsteighöhen geändert, der Vorplatz umgebaut und der Tunnel erst im Jahre 2019 geschlossen. Wir werden den Bahnhof nach der Fertigstellung besichtigen und ihn in OSM anpassen.

Ich habe die vorhandenen Elemente durch Fußwege für das INDOOR-Routing miteinander verbunden, an den Parkplatz östlich des Hauptgebäudes eine note-Tag gesetzt und die Fahrradabstellanlage vorläufig verschoben.

Also warten die Fertigstellung ab und korrigieren dann den Bahnhof.

Danke und viele Grüße, Lars
streckenkundler (2016-11-02 14:12:08+00:00): Hallo Lars,

gern geschehen. Sinn und Zweck war es ja, daß ihr nicht zuviel Arbeit reinsteckt, wenn sich vieles verändert...

Viele Grüße,

Sven
maraf24 (2016-11-03 21:34:49+00:00): A jaki jest pełny adres tych budynków? Chodzi mi o ulicę.
Tomasz Krasuski (2016-11-04 06:13:26+00:00): Osiedle unitów podlaskich blok 9 na osiedlu niema innych ulic nawet jak Pan adresie to pisze Pan osiedle Unitów Podlaskich i numer bloku.
Alecs01 (2016-11-01 18:34:45+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, is this really a bus stop?
Osm1980 (2019-04-05 09:52:43+00:00): salam ye area hast bedone tag,age tagesho midoonin ye tag monaseb barash entekhab konid
az09 (2016-11-04 07:05:15+00:00): ничосе немного)))
az09 (2016-11-04 07:05:39+00:00): переходи на JOSM!
muralito (2016-11-02 03:07:17+00:00): ¿No esta todavia en construccion el intercambiador?
¿Cuando lo habilitaron?

Ni mapbox ni bing lo muestran, ¿como lo dibujaste?
Alecs01 (2016-11-05 15:53:07+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OpenStreetMap, per favore fai attenzione, hai cancellato l'intero blocco di edifici dell'isolato, li ho ridisegnati ora
rab (2016-11-01 17:51:52+00:00): I can't spot no buildings here.
Please do not tag objects with area=yes
user_5359 (2016-11-01 17:38:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please contect your streets with the existing streets.
muralito (2016-11-02 05:29:45+00:00): Cuando intentes corregir algo ya etiquetado, tenes que tratar de asegurarte que este mal, y que estas siguiendo el criterio correcto.
trigpoint (2016-11-01 18:44:49+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. This seems a very odd place for a Police Station, have you more detail
trigpoint (2016-11-04 19:34:47+00:00): I have reverted this rubbish, although I would have loved to hear the mappers reason for placing a police station in an animal enclosure
muralito (2016-11-02 05:27:58+00:00): No, eso no es una correccion, fuel:cng=yes es lo que va.
mcepl (2016-11-02 07:22:50+00:00): Děkuji mockrát za pomoc s OSM. Mohl bych Vás ale požádat, abyste zkontrolovala, že podnik, který přidáváte už v mapě není? Všechny tři podniky, které jste přidala v tomto podání, už v mapě existují (byť často s méně údaji, nežli které jste uvedla vy). Takhle musím běhat a uklízet za Vámi.
juliafedorova (2016-11-02 13:34:04+00:00): Hello, Matej Cepl!
I do not understand you very well. Please can you write me in English? If I understand right, this addresses hide for me. So I create it.
Best regards,
Julia
mcepl (2016-11-02 13:50:03+00:00): :) I have originally wrote the note in English and only later changed to Czech. Oh well.

Thank you very much for the help with OSM. However, I would love to ask you to check that the thing you are adding has not been already added before? All three pubs in this changeset has been already present (albeit sometimes with less information than what you provided). I had to clean up after you.
juliafedorova (2016-11-02 14:31:27+00:00): Ok. I'm sorry if I gave you troubles!
mcepl (2016-11-16 22:44:05+00:00): No problem, I was told that using Maps.me is not the easiest thing to do.
muralito (2016-11-02 05:23:45+00:00): Es fuel:cng (en ingles) y no fuel:gnc
mueschel (2017-01-20 22:45:53+00:00): Bitte fügen nicht blind "junction = roundabout" an Wege an, nur weil Osmose eine Warnung anzeigt. Ein roundabout muss immer mit einem entsprechenden blauen Schild ausgestattet sein, das ist bei Wendeplätzen wie diesem sicher nicht der Fall.
mueschel (2017-01-20 22:50:43+00:00): Hi, 
please don't add "junction = roundabout" to places like this. This tag is only used in case there are the corresponding traffic signs and rules in place.
demetrio_m (2017-01-29 18:43:50+00:00): I apologize for the error. I deduced the rules of precedence from aerial photos and I could not check for traffic signal. Thanks for your correction. In the case of closed lines that are reported as errors by Osmose it would probably be better to divide them into two parts to avoid the problem.
muralito (2016-11-02 03:00:29+00:00): Si pones barrier=wall como parte de la calle, ademas de que no es lo que corresponde, la calle no queda transitable en ese tramo.
Klumbumbus (2016-11-26 16:05:25+00:00): This is most likely not a roundabout.
demetrio_m (2016-11-30 11:11:49+00:00): Corrected, thank you