piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck (2020-01-02 21:05:56+00:00): Dear Tomiii, in this changeset you added the name "Cigánytelep" to a street in Zámoly. We have received a message from someone in Zámoly saying that the street really does not have a name, and that this is a mistake. Do you know the town and this street name yourself, or do you remember if there was a street sign... or is it possible that this was indeed a mistake? Thank you - Frederik (DWG) (Ticket#2020010210000116)
MKnight (2015-06-16 10:55:36+00:00): Dieses Changeset bestand ausschliesslich aus doppelten Wegen und "verdoppelten" Nodes auf bereits eingetragenen Flächen. 
 
Änderungssatz revertiert: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32003494
chnav (2015-06-02 11:27:24+00:00): Там что круг убрали на Молдагуловой - Санкинбая ? Оставляйте комментарии к правкам, чтобы люди понимали зачем удалены данные. Когда редактура идет через ьроёзер - первая мысль что кто-то вандалит.
chnav (2015-06-02 11:27:49+00:00): ... опечатался "броузер"
wambacher (2015-05-17 19:52:40+00:00): da hast du deinen CS-Kommentar
Kakaner (2015-06-13 14:01:38+00:00): In Coswig entlang der Bahn die Straße ist offiziell eine Bahnanlage mit Schild "Betreten für Unbefugte verboten." Das dürfte access=private sein.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-10 12:18:53+00:00): In more detail:

I walked past where http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3505971351/history should be / have been and there was nothing obvious there.  If you want to add historical places, add them to OpenHistoricalMap.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3505959273/history was already mapped as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342292800#map=18/53.70020/-0.80106&layers=N .  I deleted the "isloated_dwelling" from a farmyard (the added node was neither isolated nor a dwelling).

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3505963210/history and http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3505963211/history simply aren't verifiable.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3505963204/history was a duplicate of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66348869
richardbrinkman (2015-07-09 14:24:35+00:00): Er worden in deze changeset nogal wat lijnen toegevoegd zonder enige tags. Kan ik deze allemaal verwijderen of heb je daar nog plannen mee?
In de OSM database horen namelijk alleen nuttige zaken te staan. Lijnen zonder tags zijn dat mijns inziens niet.
JJJWegdam (2015-07-09 14:45:21+00:00): Het detailleren van stadsdelen ligt bij mij soms even stil. In dit geval is dat veroorzaakt door tentamens en wat drukte aan het begin van de vakantie. Ik ben voornemens hier snel mee verder te gaan en na afloop ongebruikte lijnen natuurlijk op te ruimen.

Een voorbeeld waar ik dat opruimen tussentijds heb  gedaan is te vinden op het Roessingh (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.23139/6.87775). Dat ligt nu tijdelijk stil omdat het goed weergeven van de parkeerplaatsen nogal eentonig was. Ik besloot er later verder aan te gaan.
richardbrinkman (2015-07-10 16:00:46+00:00): Prima. Dan laat ik ze nog even staan.
Tip bij JOSM kun je wijzigingen die nog niet klaar zijn ook lokaal opslaan zodat je voorkomt dat incorrecte / onvolledige informatie in de database komt te staan.
t_ja (2015-05-13 16:13:48+00:00): Čo je to za značka "dangerous_turn_right"?
4frajer4 (2015-05-15 15:06:49+00:00): Ďakujem za upozornenie a pspravedlňujem sa to bola menšia chyba v plugine, ktorý práve vyvíjam do JOSM
4frajer4 (2015-05-15 15:36:01+00:00): Ešte ak sa ta smiem spýtať nevieš ako môžem vidieť aj konkrétne obrázky typov dopravných značiek čo som pridal do OSM?
t_ja (2015-05-15 18:05:34+00:00): Na zobrazovanie obrazkov pre znacky je potrebne zapnut styl "traffic_signs_" v nastaveniach JOSM. Tento plugin ale nema konfiguraciu pre Slovensko (da sa upravit, je to XML subor), takze by si mohol pouzit ikony napr. z pluginu RoadSigns, ktory ulahcuje zadavanie znaciek do JOSM. Slovenske znacky najdes tu: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/osm_sk/F32pr1r97Kc/3dMBIWzqGeAJ
metatech (2018-03-12 19:46:33+00:00): Hi,
Is it Osmose which suggests to remove the street name when there is a different name on for the left and the right part of the street ? This looks strange...
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/103435539
bibi6 (2018-03-12 20:48:34+00:00): It is indeed : Osmose detects "multiple names in tag 'name'" and AFAICR puts it as a  Level 1 issue. For that way, there is a name on the left and another one for the right...
metatech (2018-03-12 21:07:54+00:00): Yes, there 2 names on this way, but on the visual map, the street name is empty, which is not really human-friendly... maybe Osmose should be improved to cope with this same special case...
Skippern (2015-05-10 13:35:13+00:00): O que significando este tag? leisure=park e para ser usado no um area, e ja e mapeado como a "Parque Lagoa do Juara", o nome "pra" nao faz sentido nenhuma. Favor explica o que voce mapeando, e corregir os tags certas.
iMartinezMateu (2015-05-10 13:37:06+00:00): Error en la descripción de conjunto de cambios. Lo que se ha hecho es limitar a 100 el tramo de la autopista como corresponde en la realidad.
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-18 19:26:06+00:00): Partially reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150191322
TrickyFoxy (2024-04-18 19:08:48+00:00): Reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/150190790
rickmastfan67 (2015-05-11 01:49:19+00:00): I'm just curious, but do you make it a habit to delete other people's work wholesale and replace it with worse info?  My traces of the Best Buy and Kuhn's buildings were correct.  I live in this area, I visit those stores a lot.  Their footprint was properly traced....  Sure, the other 'parts' of North Hill Village Mall needed to be added, but deleting valid data is not the way to go about it GeoKitten.  The way that this mall was built makes it have several 'separate' buildings, even though it looks like just one.  This did use to be an indoor mall in the '90s and earlier.  Only in the past 15 years did they start taking out parts of it and replacing it with 'separate' parts that went all the way to the parking lot.
rickmastfan67 (2015-05-11 01:51:42+00:00): I'm going to be restoring my Kuhn's & Best Buy traces that you deleted while maintain the rest of your trace of the mall.
rickmastfan67 (2015-05-11 02:19:45+00:00): I also had to fix the 'First Niagara Bank' bank building you added.  While the building is there of course, it isn't just the Bank in there....  That's why I had the bank node where I did.  Otherwise I would have had it centered on that building (or have added the building myself in the past tagged as such).
GeoKitten (2015-05-17 19:43:39+00:00): My error regarding the First Niagra bank was an honest mistake.
GeoKitten (2015-05-17 19:59:56+00:00): I removed your traces of Kuhn's and Best Buy because they were all part of the same physical building, so I thought they should be tagged as such. However, upon reviewing the wiki, it mentions that divided buildings (like the one in question) are best tagged as separate buildings. So my removal of your traces was incorrect and I will not do such things in the future.
rickmastfan67 (2015-05-18 01:38:51+00:00): No problem man.  Glad we got this all sorted out now.  If you have any other questions as to how to do something in OSM, don't hesitate to send me a PM on the subject. ;)
iMartinezMateu (2015-05-10 13:44:43+00:00): Errata en la descripción de Conjunto de Cambios. Lo que se ha añadido únicamente es un POI "Balcón de Antella".
zstadler (2026-06-29 07:40:54+00:00): Hi,
Is there actually a toilette here - away from any accommodation and no path leading to it?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3508567252
iWowik (2015-05-15 11:07:57+00:00): А что, Аврору с ремонта разве уже пригнали?
Đonny (2015-05-10 14:57:07+00:00): I think it was not a wise decision for me to delete the object, but now I don't know how to restore it :-(. I'll try JOSM.
But the original issue stay, there's a lot of sea marked as mainland.
Đonny (2015-05-10 15:10:42+00:00): OK, maybe it was not that unwise. No, the sea appeared correctly. So I'll not undo my change. But maybe the border of Deception Pass State Park is wrong now.
Glassman (2015-05-10 16:16:02+00:00): It looks like Deception State Park boundary is broken now. I modified the boundary about a year ago. The whole area was a mess. What object did you delete? I wonder if I added it?
Đonny (2015-05-11 06:40:12+00:00): I deleted a object 233546556, v5 which has been part of the boundary, but it als somehow formed a new shoreline in the middle of the sea, so everything north from the boundary looked like mainland.
Glassman (2015-05-11 16:08:56+00:00): I reconnected the park multipolygon - I need recheck validation to make sure nothing is missing as well as check rendering.
Đonny (2015-05-12 06:52:21+00:00): Looks good, thank you, and sorry for my invasive edit.
GerdP (2015-11-11 10:44:49+00:00): please review:
what is meant with
oneway=-1; yes ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/19790151
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-10 21:59:08+00:00): Kolego, czy ktoś Ci już mówił, że na tagowaniu dróg w OSM znasz się jak świnia na gwiazdach? Popatrz sobie no na to: http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=144524437 - troszkę słabo robisz te korekty...
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-11 10:56:45+00:00): Kolego, nie wiem po co piszesz do mnie prywatne wiadomości, skoro komentarz napisałem w publicznej przestrzeni.
Napisałeś coś o kulturze (nie wiem czyjej, bo piszesz ogólnikami). Podejrzewam, że chodzi Ci o moją - więc odpowiem. Kulturalny to ja mogę być w stosunku do osób, które nie psują danych w tym projekcie. Ty z kolei już niejednokrotnie pokazałeś, że masz pracę innych gdzieś. Mapujesz według swojego widzimisię, więc nie widzę powodu by Cię szanować.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-11 12:05:08+00:00): Napisałeś "Propsze komentować zmianę S6 na autostradę" - po pierwsze, nie wiem o co chodzi, a po drugie - będę komentował to, co mam ochotę skomentować.
Geo-Tobi (2024-03-30 18:26:32+00:00): Hallo Toni,
gemäß diesem Bild hier:
M18
https://maps.app.goo.gl/4FtxEZZ2aYWF14Ab7
sieht der Radweg Kapserweg nicht nach Vz240 aus. Könnte natürlich sein, dass sich das in 9 Jahren geändert hat. Bist du dort zufällig unterwegs und könntest das prüfen?
Grüße
ToniE (2024-03-30 20:30:04+00:00): Hmm, zufällig eher nicht, mit dem Rad derzeit noch zu weit, ist auch keine schöne Strecke. Also wohl eher mal mit dem Auto. Mal sehen.
ToniE (2024-04-09 09:09:09+00:00): Hab's angepasst. Das Foto oben ist korrekt.
Zartbitter (2015-05-11 18:27:20+00:00): Ist die Kneipe "Zur Kachel" jetzt wirklich ein Friseur geworden?
maraf24 (2015-05-10 19:05:50+00:00): brak komentarza
maraf24 (2015-05-10 19:06:08+00:00): brak komentarza, zduplikowane osiedla
pawloo (2015-05-10 21:46:40+00:00): Duplikacja była wyłącznie tymczasowa, ponieważ zgodnie z projektem nowej uchwały rady miejskiej miało powstać 10 nowych osiedli jako jednostki pomocnicze miasta. Jednak ich granice obejmują po kilka osiedli, których nazewnictwo było zwyczajowe. Dlatego, by odróżnić jedne osiedla, które mają funkcjonować oficjalnie od tych, w których granicach mają się znajdować, chciałem tym oficjalnym nadać status dzielnic, natomiast tym mniejszym, zawartym w nich nadać status "sąsiedztwo". W ten sposób zwyczajowy i nowy podział pozostałby zachowany. Tutaj link do projektu uchwały: http://debica.pl/data/files/220/projekt-uchwaly-w-sprawie-utworzenia-osiedli-na-terenie-miasta-debicy-20150407091315.pdf Jest bardzo prawdopodobne, że wejdzie w życie, a w przypadku naniesienia poprawek po prostu wprowadziłbym korekty, ponieważ monitoruję sprawę na bieżąco.
maraf24 (2015-05-10 22:16:00+00:00): 1. Nie umieszczamy tu projektów, poza ściśle określonymi wyjątkami (drogi i to nie każde).
Na pewno nie umieszczamy nieistniejących elementów pod takimi samymi tagami co istniejące. 
2. Granice dzielnic czy osiedli pełniących taką funkcję robi się tylko w postaci relacji z admin_level=9. Te nieoficjalne osiedla można dać z admin_level=11.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Poland/Podzia%C5%82_administracyjny#Tworzenie_granic_administracyjnych
pawloo (2015-05-10 22:38:48+00:00): O dzięki wielkie. Szukałem właśnie takiej informacji jak to w ogóle oznaczać, żeby ta cała struktura dzielnicowo-osiedlowa była dobrze i ładnie widoczna, ale nie mogłem jej znaleźć, bo jestem tu nowy. Za jakiś czas postaram się ogarnąć ten cały bajzel z osiedlami jeszcze raz od nowa. Co do tego projektu to nie ma co się martwić - na 90 % będzie to ostateczna wersja podziału. Sprawa powinna zostać zatwierdzona za niedługo, ponieważ w czerwcu są planowane wybory do rad tychże osiedli.
CloCkWeRX (2015-05-11 22:00:43+00:00): This has caused a lot of conflicts with existing buildings traced via Bing imagery
SomeoneElse (2015-05-15 13:52:13+00:00): Hi,
Something went a bit wrong here - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344120051/history and a number of others were in the South Atlantic.

Cheers,
Andy
GerdP (2015-10-26 14:09:46+00:00): please review:
why do you draw a circle tagged 
highway=roundabout
around a roundabout?
Please try not to invent new highway tags,
this is very likely to confuse routing
software.
way 344121934,way 335069831
Govanus (2015-10-26 19:31:40+00:00): I think I copied someoneelses roundabout I think it was used as the roundabout might not have similar sence of class (primary, unclassified etc. I think also it was used by some software to enable that the special conditions of a roundabout were present and also I think it was used by some renderes to drow the spot as a special roundabout symbol, or it could be that I was moveing it for an incorrectly identified mini-roundabout which it wasn't signed or sized to be.originaly the roundabout between the Osney Lane and the A420 just a little way south was similar but although it began life signed as a new roundabout  with a cyle bypass line defined in paint later received some mini-roundabout signs too to be confusing.  I also looked at tag info and someone else defintly has been using the same tag combination as I haven't made more than 60 roundabouts!  If highway=mini_roundabout is valued for several feature markings then highway= roundabout should be just as valid?
Govanus (2015-10-26 19:34:34+00:00): The site needs an update for the latest phase of construction that moving toward a final form now.
GerdP (2015-10-26 19:42:59+00:00): Please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=mini_roundabout
It explains the differences between circular highway types in detail.
Govanus (2015-10-26 21:41:00+00:00): ok so it should be junction instead of highway and copied wrong from another roundabout probably.
Feel free to correct the routings and areas too on all the roundabouts.
they were corrected from mini-roundabouts because of signage and sizeing showed thay weren't supposed to be.
Govanus (2015-10-26 21:42:35+00:00): note there are three circles on most of my roundabouts for the areaisation and routing line combined concentricly.
GerdP (2015-10-26 21:44:32+00:00): yes, I was talking about these additional and IMHO obsolete circles. The normal roundabouts (junction=roundabout) are okay.
Govanus (2015-10-26 21:49:38+00:00): the other circles are for area definition Osmrender dosen't do area rendering on major roads by a ploicy descion of themselves but for consistance and the intrest of others that do they were added and I render them offline for instance from the dataproduct version of osm the planet files.
SomeoneElse (2015-10-26 22:56:24+00:00): @Govanus - when you say "Osmrender" what exactly do you mean?  Do you mean the former osm.org map layer http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmarender ?  The software still exists, but the instance that was hosted on osm.org is long gone.  Or perhaps you mean something else?  I'm also not sure exactly what "the dataproduct version of osm the planet files" is?
Govanus (2015-10-27 21:50:01+00:00): ok planet files these are the data files of the whole of the OSM data described form links near here:- https://switch2osm.org/the-basics/  and obtainable from here:- http://planet.openstreetmap.org/

the osmrender I think was the name that I know the initilal standard render layer by.
Eebie (2017-05-29 16:15:53+00:00): Hello,
I was interested in EuroVelo 16, the bike route that is visible on Waymarked trails for bikes. I can't find anything about this route on the official EuroVelo website http://www.eurovelo.com . I can only conclude that this route doesn't exist and that it should be deleted from OpenStreetMap. It is confusing to find routes on the map but not in reality on the ground.

Regards,

Eebie
Strubbl (2025-08-01 17:10:31+00:00): Hallo landini, die von dir damals kartierte Website an den Rettungstreffpunkten leitet nun auf https://www.baysf.de/ausflugsziele/
Das ist inhaltlich nicht mehr korrekt, oder? Weißt du zufällig, ob es da eine neue Seite gibt?
naoliv (2015-09-08 02:26:42+00:00): JrLima, o que seriam esses pontos que você adicionou na lagoa? O que você quis representar?
species (2015-05-11 05:55:09+00:00): Hi,

amenity=[bicycle_repair_station](http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=bicycle%20repair%20station?uselang=en-GB) wäre schon korrekt gewesen - jetzt hat das Ding keinen Haupttag mehr :-/

"commons=*" haben wir nur für eine inzwischen veraltete Karte in Graz verwendet, den braucht man eigentlich nimmer verwenden.
lg, Michi
Severin Kann (2015-05-14 14:37:40+00:00): Ok, habs jetzt wieder auf amenity=bicycle_repair_station geändert und die commons gelöscht (ebenso bei den zahlreichen anderen analogen Fällen in Graz). Da bisher fast alle Serviceboxen nur mit dem commons-tag versehen waren dachte ich, dass dies die aktuelle Variante sei. 

lg, Severin
Marsu Pulami (2020-03-19 21:04:51+00:00): Bonjour Sky99, je vais annuler cette "Définition approximative de la zone du fablab" ainsi que toutes celles se rapportant à cette zone.
Le Fablab a déménagé à Morne Bernard fin 2017.
gileri (2015-05-10 22:07:45+00:00): Bonne initiative ! Ce genre de nettoyage est pour moi indispensable, ça permet d'avoir une base de données (et carte!) homogène et propre.

Si possible, pouvez-vous indiquer ici pour m'inspirer, ainsi que d'autres ? Merci !
GeorgeKaplan (2015-05-10 22:24:30+00:00): Indiquer quoi ?

Précision sur le changeset : il y avait aussi Republique -> République.
gileri (2015-05-10 22:26:13+00:00): oups, j'ai oublié des mots... Je voulais vous demander la méthode et les outils utilisés pour récupérer les données problématiques et les corriger (JOSM directement ?)
GeorgeKaplan (2015-05-10 22:32:43+00:00): Requêtes dans Overpass Turbo, export vers JOSM, vérification des objets avant la correction. En cas de doute, je laisse tel quel.
Jesper Henriksen (2015-05-10 19:45:52+00:00): Ikke Monter, men Byggmax selvfølgelig :)
skquinn (2015-05-30 07:45:07+00:00): FYI, Merkaartor's default changeset comments are almost useless; there is a reason no other editor makes default comments like this. It would be a lot better to just replace them with a brief description of what you actually did.
JonasSmedegaard (2015-09-09 10:03:01+00:00): Hi ormen,

Please could you clarify what looked incorrect to you about those changes?

Now that thei'r gone I cannot see how OSM renders the data I provided, but here's how it looks in my own slippymap rendering: http://map.sirireiter.dk/2015/chrhavn/
frosm (2021-01-06 23:46:07+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/344146723
si tu as las possibilité, pourrais-tu vérifier si ce bureau de poste existe toujours ? je ne l'ai pas vu sur le site de LaPoste
ce qui a d'étrange c'est que le 13 mai 2015 quelqu'un renseignait un bureau de poste tout proche https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131130723
Bonne continuation
mathieuS (2015-05-11 07:56:49+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM !

1. Vous avez ajouté un sentier, pas un chemin. Est-ce bien correct ?

2. L'utilisation que vous avez faite du tag "name" parait abusive. En effet, ce tag devrait être utilisé pour décrire le nom d'un objet et pas sa fonction. En l'occurrence, vous voulez mapper un réservoir à copeaux. Dans ce cas, j'utiliserais plutôt les tags suivants :
* man_made=storage_tank (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank)
* content=woodchips
mathieuS (2015-07-29 19:34:58+00:00): Corrigé dans le changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32964356
berndw (2015-05-11 08:50:06+00:00): Da es IMHO ein wilder Pfad über den Damm ist, würde ich eventuell highway=path komplett entfernen. Das gleiche gilt für den Damm auf Höhe des Haltepunktes Bad Honnef in Osten von Grafenwerth

Andererseits, wäre hier nicht besser eine Angabe für width=*, visibiltity=* und smoothness=* angebracht?

highway=path implimentiert motor_vehicle=no, deswegen würde ich das gar nicht separat taggen

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
SomeoneElse (2015-05-19 12:54:30+00:00): "highway=footway" doesn't imply an "urban" footpath, simply one that is suited to walking on but not other means of transport.  "highway=path" doesn't say anything about what sort of path it is or what sort of traffic it is suitable for thought "foot=designated" does say that foot traffic is encouraged (e.g. by signage) to use it as opposed to some other route.

Please don't replace highway=footway with highway=path - you're removing useful information from the map.  See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Duck_tagging for a more in-depth discussion on this.
gistutor (2015-05-19 14:52:30+00:00): Thanks for the advice. It appears that there is inconsistent guidance as the 'short' definition of a Footpath is 'Urban paths designated for pedestrians only'. As this definition is the one that appears when digitising / editing features then it is less likely that users will refer to the more detailed definition provided in your link. Is this something that could be corrected in the editor? In the meantime I will use Path and set the Access to Foot=yes to make it clear that this is a footpath NOT in an urban area. I trust that this will resolve the problem you have identified.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-19 15:51:12+00:00): Unfortunately someone has edited the wiki page to make it no longer describe how mappers have been using highway=footway for many years.  I've added a comment to the user talk page 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User_talk:Geow .
The problem with "highway=path" is that it simply doesn't say anything about the physical attibutes of the footpath in question, whereas footway does - it makes it clear that it's designed for feet rather than for anything else.  You can of course add other tags such as surface, width, tracktype, smoothness, sac_scale, and you'd need to do at least some of these to avoid losing the information that "this is a footpath".

Away from the physical description, I'd also ensure that the legal definition is correct - so "foot=yes" if applicable (and it will be for the ones in this list across access land) and "designation=public_footpath" if that is also the case (in some cases that's already set).
andergrin (2017-12-17 18:29:31+00:00): рий день. А що то за соціальна установа посеред поля https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2571852483 Там на фото видніються якісь стовпи чи статуї, можливо це археологічні об'єкти?
algot (2017-12-18 00:02:57+00:00): Це неправильно поставлений тег. Правильно amenity =shelter
Там серед поля стоiть стара цистерна i в нiй зроблено вхiд. Так що вона може бути використана як укриття вiд дощу
GerdP (2015-11-30 22:05:12+00:00): Hallo!
Habe maxspeed=2 entfernt. 
Was war gemeint?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31478504
DoDoMR (2015-11-30 22:24:52+00:00): Hab's gerade korrigiert - da habe ich wohl der Wert aus lanes in maxspeed übernommen ;) sollten 100 sein. Korrektur folgt gleich. danke für den hinweis!
GerdP (2015-12-01 07:02:31+00:00): OK, danke für die schnelle Reaktion :-)
SJFriedl (2015-05-10 22:00:49+00:00): Actual source is City of Irvine GIS
pmailkeey (2015-05-11 00:14:49+00:00): Can you find another map that shows this T junction like this ? I can't
Dmytro O (2015-10-14 16:52:26+00:00): There is special value designed for public holidays "PH". You do not need to specify all holidays. See

PH Public Holiday, can be used to indicate different opening hours during public holidays (e.g., Mo-Fr 09:00-17:00; PH 10:00-12:00; PH Su off)
Dmytro O (2015-10-14 16:52:46+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours?uselang=en-GB