piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:28:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Matthew Darwin (2018-12-04 13:49:21+00:00): Hi Danny,
3 Desjardins Avenue has duplicate addresses for units 25-39 (odd).  Since you said you did a survey here, could you check?

This is in: Co-operative d'habitation Brebeuf
Supaplex (2018-04-19 09:28:34+00:00): 抱歉，您將無法查證，或是錯誤的資訊發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！由於開放街圖地圖資料有多第三方網站或服務在使用，如果加到開放街圖上面會影響的範圍比想像中大。第三方網站清單如下： https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM-based_services Pokemon GO 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Niantic 運用開放街圖，用在遊戲內的地圖視覺，以及計畫出什麼怪的環境變數。 以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。 編輯須知 另外由於Pokemon Go所使用的OSM圖資是去年的圖資，所以現在今年修改的公園也都不會出現超夢的，請不用擔心! 給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers 台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan 常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58188214
mavl (2019-07-21 04:52:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
AkuAnakTimur (2018-04-18 06:27:12+00:00): Many thanks for your addition!

Made some adjustments so that when some third party app (using OpenStreetMap) updates their map, the place will show up properly

http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5560897974

Any websites, social media pages or contact numbers?
mavl (2019-07-21 04:52:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:52:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:52:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:52:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:52:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Supaplex (2018-04-19 09:28:40+00:00): 抱歉，您將無法查證，或是錯誤的資訊發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！由於開放街圖地圖資料有多第三方網站或服務在使用，如果加到開放街圖上面會影響的範圍比想像中大。第三方網站清單如下： https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM-based_services Pokemon GO 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Niantic 運用開放街圖，用在遊戲內的地圖視覺，以及計畫出什麼怪的環境變數。 以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。 編輯須知 另外由於Pokemon Go所使用的OSM圖資是去年的圖資，所以現在今年修改的公園也都不會出現超夢的，請不用擔心! 給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers 台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan 常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58188425
mavl (2019-07-21 04:52:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:28:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:30:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:52:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:53:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:53:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:53:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:53:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:53:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:53:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:53:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:53:26+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:53:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:53:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 04:53:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:32:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
BCNorwich (2018-04-18 06:38:59+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Does HRTA replace Chic Unique, they are both hair salons at the same address? If so then the original POI ought to have been updated in order to keep OSM history intact. Certainly there should not be two POI for the same salon.
Also a problem is that the manner of tagging is not to OSM best practice (open hours especially). There's lots of advice online and if I can help please just ask.
Your response is awaited Regards Bernard
arivenid (2019-07-23 03:48:10+00:00): "Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 333017415 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential' till this node 3401317887.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
AkuAnakTimur (2019-07-29 14:47:33+00:00): The way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333017415) beyond the particular node (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3401317887) is mapped as unclassified highway because it has higher hierarchy - it carries more traffic in and out across this village.

Source - I'm a local mapper
Supaplex (2019-02-08 10:05:04+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
zstadler (2020-02-23 12:42:54+00:00): Hello Emerance1,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581103387 was added in this edit, but it has no tags. Is this a mistake or an incomplete mapping?
R0bst3r (2018-04-19 07:39:48+00:00): Hallo Smoop997,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus. Man hätte alternativ auch ein neues Wohngebiet anlegen können.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/58189887
Nakaner (2024-10-04 10:17:57+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz eine Radroute zwischen Rußheim/Elisabethenwört und dem Fähranleger in Leopoldshafen eingetragen. Ich habe Teile der Route, soweit sie nicht überschwemmt waren, gestern geprüft und konnte keine wegweisende Beschilderung feststellen.

Hattest du damals Radroutenwegweiser vor Ort gesehen oder welche nicht genannte Quelle hast du verwendet. Vor deiner Änderung war dort keine Radroute eingetragen (ich habe mit einer Attic-Anfrage an die Overpass-API diese Behauptung verifiziert). https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1SaR

Hintergrund meiner Anfrage ist, dass wir in OSM nur vor Ort beschilderte Radrouten erfassen.

Viele Grüße

Michael
aluka (2024-10-04 11:38:52+00:00): Hallo Michael,

die Änderung ist schon einige Jahre alt. Früher gab es dort die grünen Rad-Wegweiser. Damals bin ich dort oft gefahren. Dann wurde der Damm saniert und der Radweg war lange Zeit gesperrt. Seitdem bin nicht mehr dort unterwegs gewesen. Es kann durchaus sein, dass im Rahmen der Dammsanierung die Beschilderung entfernt wurde.
Wenn es keine Beschilderung mehr gibt, kann man die Radroute entfernen. Die dort auch eingetragene Radroute EV15 ist jetzt glaube ich auch über die andere Rheinseite ausgeschildert.

Viele Grüße, 
Alu
Nakaner (2024-10-06 20:38:21+00:00): Hallo Alu,

danke für die Antwort! Das bringt langsam Licht ins Dunkel.

Ich werde trotzdem noch alle Stücke befahren, bei denen ich den Verdacht habe, dass sie entschildert wurden, bevor ich die entsprechenden Routenrelationen kürze/lösche.

Viele Grüße

Michael
km2bp (2022-02-25 11:58:37+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/438904205  

Does this path still exist?
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:26:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
zstadler (2020-02-23 12:43:24+00:00): Hello Emerance1,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581106186 was added in this edit, but it has no tags. Is this a mistake or an incomplete mapping?
zstadler (2020-02-23 12:44:08+00:00): Hello Emerance1,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581107138 was added in this edit, but it has no tags. Is this a mistake or an incomplete mapping?
user_5359 (2018-04-18 16:08:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:29:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Lokai (2018-04-18 09:14:04+00:00): Hallo, wenn Gebäude nur verschoben werden sollen (bspw. Gebäude 600), ist es nicht notwendig diese zu löschen und neu zu zeichnen. Die history geht dabei verloren. Viel Erfolg
PT-53 (2018-04-18 12:17:53+00:00): Hallo Smoop997,
wenn Du Gebäude oder andere Flächen anhand von Luftbildern verschiebst, solltest Du zuerst den Luftbild-Versatz korrigieren.
Alle Luftbilder haben einen Versatz der schon mal 10m betragen kann.
Meine Empfehlung deshalb:
Benutz den Editor JOSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:JOSM/Guide) und blende im Menü Hintergrundbild die amtliche Karte Maps4BW (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW) ein, von der wir legal abzeichnen dürfen.
Wenn Du fragen dazu hast kannst Du diese über die Kommentar-Funktion stellen.
Grüße aus Oberschwaben
zstadler (2020-02-23 12:56:09+00:00): Hello Jeries1Riady,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581119617 was added in this edit, but it has no tags. Is this a mistake or an incomplete mapping?
maraf24 (2018-04-20 18:19:47+00:00): Po raz kolejny usuwam fikcyjny budynek.
Proszę się nauczyć prawidłowo obsługiwać edytor.
Dodatkowo nie mu drogi o takim kształcie.
Nie ma również dworca autobusowego.
rossomat (2018-04-20 22:24:04+00:00): a kto powiedział że ja zaznaczam budynek!!! to jest plac dworca!! jeżeli nie znasz ani gminy ani miejscowości to nie wypowiadaj sie ani nie usuwaj czegoś czego nie znasz!! a jest niby droga o takim kształcie jaki ty zaznaczyłeś? gówno prawda!! budynek jakos zostawiłeś! usunąłęś plac!!!!! człowieku wez się opanuj i nie usuwaj tego bo to co robinsz to zwykły wandalizm1!!!!!!
rossomat (2018-04-20 22:25:21+00:00): JEŻELI JESZCZE RAZ MOJA PRACA ZOSTANIE USUNIĘTA ZGŁOSZĘ SPRAWĘ DO MODERACJI I STRACISZ UPRAWNIENIA DO EDYTOWANIA! CHCESZ SIE PRZEKONAC CZY JEST DWORZEC TO PRZYJEDZ DO MIEJSCOWOSCI I SIE PRZEKONAJ CZŁOWIEKU!!!!
maraf24 (2018-04-22 09:01:39+00:00): Są kasy biletowe?
Jest poczekalnia dla pasażerów (nie wiata)?
Są perony?
Jeśli nie - to nie jest dworzec.
rossomat (2018-04-22 11:08:00+00:00): Debilu!!! Zaznaczyłem PLAC PUBLICZNY!! po 1 Udowodnij mi ze to nie jest plac publiczny!! Jeżeli to jest plac publiczny to jakim kurwa prawem go usuwasz!!! 
po 2 jeżeli taka nazwa placu funkcjonuje lokalnie to jakim kurwa prawem to usuwasz???!!!!! 
po 3 udowodnij mi że przejazd autobusów przez plac dworca przeb iega tak jak to zaznaczasz uporczywie dokonujac wandalism przez złośliwe usuwanie mojej pracy! wiem jak jezdza po placu autobusy i tak to zaznaczam a ty wandali ciagle to niszczysz!!!!
CZY MAM CIE ZGŁOSIC WANDALU DO MODERATORÓW????
rossomat (2018-04-22 11:16:29+00:00): WIDZISZ WANDALU ZE NIE ZAZNACZYLEM DWORCA TYLKO PLAC PUBLICZNY!! JEŻELI PLAC NAZYWA SIĘ DWORZEC AUTOBUSOOWY TO ODPIERDOL SIE OD TEGO !!! BYŁEŚ KIEDYŚ W TYM MIEJSCU??? JEŻELI NIE TO SIĘ ODPIERDOL1!!!
rossomat (2018-04-22 11:20:57+00:00): SPRAWDŻ SOB IE W BIAŁEJ PODLASKIEJ DWORZEC - NIE MA ZAZNACZONYCH PERONÓW - WIĘC SIĘ ODPIERDOL!!!!
abakus_uploader (2018-04-18 22:41:37+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2018-04-18 15:59:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:29:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
eggie (2018-04-18 08:43:36+00:00): Dag Bart.. Wanneer het er niet meer is kan het weg. Lijkt me prima gelukt zo. Er liep hier ook geen routerelatie dus verwijderen was geen probleem.
MVG,
Eggie
freebeer (2019-06-29 17:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71740096 where the changeset comment is: deleting a personal cyrillic wilderness hut maps.me bogus bookmark and all that
johnny_1982 (2018-06-12 20:06:59+00:00): Hallo VerkehrBS,
folgende Anmerkungen zu der Bushaltestelle "Siedlung":
1.) Der Name (von beiden) Haltestellen ist falsch, Tippfehler. Der Aushang an der Haltestelle bezeichnet sie selbst als "Thune Siedlung".
2.) Die Position ist falsch. Beide Haltestellen liegen weiter östlich, ungefähr  zwischen den Hausnummern 1a und 39.
Johnny
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:31:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
bxl-forever (2020-07-23 13:57:30+00:00): Hello,
Not sure emergency=yes is correct for Rue d’Argent/Zilverstraat (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/369853232).  I believe fire trucks or emergency vehicles will be unable to pass through.
ForstEK (2019-05-21 06:44:14+00:00): Здравствуйте, Yukarin! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/581141100/history - подправил трубопровод согласно принятой схеме тэгирования https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:man_made%3Dpipeline
literan (2018-04-18 12:19:25+00:00): ваша правка противоречит здравому смыслу и правилам: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.A1.D0.BE.D0.BA.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.89.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B8_.D0.B0.D0.B1.D0.B1.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.B2.D0.B8.D0.B0.D1.82.D1.83.D1.80.D1.8B_.28.D0.BD.D0.B5_.D0.B8.D1.81.D0.BF.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.B7.D1.83.D0.B9.D1.82.D0.B5_.D0.B8.D1.85.29 - пожалуйста, не делайте так больше, или мне придется обратиться в DWG
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:28:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
user_5359 (2018-04-18 15:52:51+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the node instead to update the information?
eggie (2018-04-18 08:47:30+00:00): Klopt Jan...kan ook niet anders. Er staat hier nog wel oude tagging op mbt uitzondering tweewielers.
cycleway=opposite
Tegenwoordig mappen we 
oneway:bicycle=no
onewat:moped=no (Indien van toepassing)
Lokai (2018-04-18 09:10:03+00:00): Hallo, achte bitte darauf rechteckige Gebäude z.B. per Taste s (Editor iD) rechtwinklig zu machen. Gutes Gelingen
ndm (2018-04-18 22:02:19+00:00): Was there clear external signage when you surveyed this?
EdLoach (2018-04-19 09:08:04+00:00): I'm not sure why you are asking me - I just made the edit for the company that are based there as they only seemed to be able to leave a note. You should be asking them as the people who "did the survey".
ndm (2018-04-19 19:22:08+00:00): A number of "spam" notes have been added to Bristol in the past. 

I would expect even if arm chair mapping it would be advisable to check mapilliary or other open sources -- otherwise you can't determine whether the "office" occupies the whole building, or is simply a mail address in an appartment block.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what.27s_on_the_ground
EdLoach (2018-04-20 07:56:49+00:00): You have a point, but perfect can be the enemy of the good. We've gone from knowing of no businesses in the building to having one mapped. If it turns out there are more then we can add them later. Don't forget from https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disclaimer "The maps are an iterative ongoing work-in-progress"
DenisJu (2018-05-11 00:09:56+00:00): Hello BluesBrothers,
i can see in this changeset many replaces where you have deleted and remapped the same street. This is no good practice because the editing history get lost.

- https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=58193498

Regards
Denis
Blues Brothers (2019-07-14 17:54:34+00:00): Hello DenisJu,

sorry for writing so much time after your comment. I'm not checking mails so often.

Thank you for your notice, you are right about not deleting and remapping, but sometimes it is more simple. I'll try not to follow this practice.
johsin18 (2018-04-18 09:22:42+00:00): Es gibt verschiedene Varianten Adressen einzutragen, diese hier wurden nach einem Schema importiert, dass einen offiziellen Review durchlaufen hat:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canton_Basel-Stadt_Building_and_Address_Import
Die Adress-Knoten sollten allerdings Teil des Gebäudeumrisses sein, das wurde damals wohl noch falsch gemacht. Aber ich würde jetzt nicht alle Adress-Knoten entfernen und stattdessen die Gebäude taggen.
Supaplex (2019-02-08 10:04:40+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Noen (2018-08-25 22:38:57+00:00): Denne sykkelstien er stengt for alle - ikke kun for kjørende pga. anleggsarbeid. Jeg endrer tilbake til access=no.
ENTUR Fredrik Edler (2018-08-27 15:43:47+00:00): Supert, da holder du denne oppdatert. :)
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:27:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
chnav (2018-12-14 10:42:24+00:00): Please do not change roads status randomly unless you know the real condition and road usage. You did kill the proper routing between large regions, one day someone will follow car navigator guidance and have LARGE troubles out there. Thanks.
PS: changing residential->unclassified is the proper solution.
Mar Mar (2018-12-14 11:27:23+00:00): First of all apologies if I did anything that disturbed navigation.  If I remember well I only changed the tag -> residential inside the town, not the roads that connect large areas. To understand better and avoid this in the future,can you specify (maybe with screenshot and arrows) which streets have been incorrectly modified by me?
chnav (2018-12-14 11:53:50+00:00): Hi, this way was mapped as residential by maper
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/398727772/history  

It has connected three hamlets in the middle of nowhere ))
Then it was tertiary, now I split it and it mostly abandoned, so I set it as service as some
chnav (2018-12-14 11:54:48+00:00): ...someone may re-survey it on the ground.
chnav (2018-12-14 11:56:49+00:00): I always check with local mappers ways they travel, especially between regions, then correct the map to make sure it'll follow trunks.
Nakaner-repair (2018-04-19 23:27:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 58248188, 58247754, 58247205, 58247984 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by a group of commercial editors who did not answer questions. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61964 for further information.
Nakaner (2018-04-18 12:39:38+00:00): Hi,

you seem to be part of a paid/organized/commercial editing activity. Please add a note to your profile page at openstreetmap.org (editable via your user settings at openstreetmap.org) which states which company/organisation you belong to, who pays you for editing and which software, technology and rules you use to determine which roads you edit.

Which website do you use to edit OpenStreetMap (content of address bar please)? iD 2.4.1 is not running at openstreetmap.org.

Please add that information and answer all questions before you upload any further edits to OpenStreetMap. Otherwise we will block your accounts and revert all your edits!

Please spread this message among your workmates. It applies to everyone of your "team".

Best regards

Michael
DaveF (2018-04-18 11:50:54+00:00): To check, has the building been demolished?
SarahJahs (2018-04-18 13:10:37+00:00): No, it still exists and needs to be re-labelled 'Accommodation Stores'.
DaveF (2018-04-18 13:53:59+00:00): You've deleted the building tag from both. Please revert. As you know what they are, is there a reason you can't add their new usage?
SarahJahs (2018-04-18 14:14:11+00:00): I have tried to reinstate this, it's very difficult to use. I can't find an option to edit the text.
DaveF (2018-04-18 11:43:05+00:00): To check, has the building been demolished?