piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skyper (2021-05-09 14:34:18+00:00): Grr, ist in Richtung Westen gesperrt und in Richtung Osten erlauft, sorry.
skyper (2021-12-06 15:43:29+00:00): Beide Baustellen scheinen noch nicht ganz beendet: https://www.neuenburg.de/Startseite/wirtschaft+_+bauen/Aktuelle+Baumassnahmen.html
PT-53 (2021-12-06 15:53:18+00:00): Dort steht doch aber unter
- Baumaßnahmen des Regierungspräsidiums
- Kreisel Ost, West und Wuhrloch
> Kreisverkehre sind in Betrieb
oder ist das eine andere Baustelle?
skyper (2021-12-06 16:23:42+00:00): Andere (eigene) Baustelle: Die Kreisverkehre sind doch alle frei, nur der Kronenrain war und ist, anscheinend auch noch, als Zufahrt gesperrt. Bin aber auch nicht vor Ort.
Dino Michelini (2021-04-29 13:11:57+00:00): Hi, this modification to the Via Francigena route does not appear on the official website. Are you sure it exists? Another question. Granted that this variant exists it should not be mapped in this way; please refer to the wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roles_for_recreational_route_relations. Please if this variant exists correct and create a new correct route, vice versa I am forced to cancel your changes. Thank you
Velikodsky (2021-04-22 19:37:07+00:00): Тут я відкотив набори змін 87874182, 87874214, 87874275, 99653176, 99695276, 99695642, 99723775, 101493903 учасника Veowiovi (район метро Шулявська, Київ). На повідомлення та коментарі він не відповідає. Помилки були такі:

1. Veowiovi змістив все за максаром з нульовим зміщенням, хоча для цього району зміщення Maxar має бути приблизно 5.88; 1.72.

2. З'єднав тротуари з підземною лінією метро (way 751374419) у декількох точках. В результаті метро змістилось.

3. Додав тротуари (way 909118321, way 909118320) та службовий проїзд (way 825382816), яких не існує (зараз під Шулявським мостом - будмайданчик).

4. Замінив тротуари на службові проїзди (Changeset: 87874214) біля входу у м. Шулявська. Там звісно ніяких проїздів немає: там взагалі сходи.

5. Перемістив public_transport=stop_position (node 1448786898) з вулиці на тротуар, а public_transport=platform (node 1448786899) - на 20 м вбік.
eggie (2021-04-22 20:51:58+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback..  Mooie aanvulling, maar de naam van het pad is niet name=geen naam
Dat moet dus weg.
je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103434062

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-04-22 21:01:43+00:00): Oke Rikus.. name=geen naam er af.  Het pad heet overigens Overloop volgens de BGT. Die naam heb ik op dat gedeelte toegevoegd.
MVG
eggie
Antoni_W (2021-05-25 07:47:10+00:00): Cześć, czy ulica Chełmińska https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/846878631 jest rzeczywiście częścią WTR? W przewodnikach i śladach GPX nie ma takiej odnogi.
Antoni_W (2021-05-25 07:52:35+00:00): Dlaczego droga rowerowa wzdłuż ulicy Chełmińskiej  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/934027740 jest otagowana jak szlak WTR? Jeżeli rzeczywiście jest tam WTR (co wygląda mi na błąd, patrz poprzedni komentarz) to droga powinna być raczej dodana do relacji WRT a nie otagowana w taki sposób.
eggie (2021-04-22 21:06:53+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

Feedback.. 
Wanneer Ice and shades geen bezoekadres kent worden bedrijven niet opgenomen in OSM.
Bedrijven worden bijgetagd op de adresnode. Ik zal wat aanpassen.
MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
canfe (2021-04-25 05:42:25+00:00): Gli orari di apertura non possono essere in formato testuale, vanno formattati.
Bisognerebbe copiarli da quelli dell'osteria che però non li ha.
Conviene mettere tutto in "note"
Per non impazzire con gli orari usare l'editor:
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
rohieb (2021-05-13 02:07:50+00:00): FYI:

"Already existing features may be closed for a short time for a temporary construction (e.g. old, damaged roads getting rebuilt). Don't use construction=* to tag such short-term closures (e.g. a road closed over a weekend to replace a sewer pipe); consider using conditional restrictions instead. As OSM data is often used offline (and therefore may be several months old), only tag construction sites (particularly roads and railroads) if they are planned to be closed for at least six to nine months."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction
Roman Braunschweiger (2021-05-14 19:33:52+00:00): Ok, Thanks for the tip. I didn't take in account this comment from wiki when I made these changes. This construction is planned to last ca. 4 months, but it's of course less than 6-9 months as wiki tells. From now I will keep it in mind:-)
Ludhiana (2021-04-22 20:12:16+00:00): Please straighten your buildings before upload by pressing Q, otherwise they are not usable.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103435247
BCNorwich (2021-04-24 08:55:09+00:00): Hi, I've removed Way: 934042105 as it was placed on top of an existing highway. I've already explained the problems this causes.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-04-24 08:48:25+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

There are many problems with cycleway Way: 934042104  It is mostly placed on top of existing highways making duplication of highways and thus disrupting routing.  If a way needs correcting or amending you should do this to the existing way. 

The problem of duplicated highways was pointed out to you on Changeset: 103361875 which you have not addressed. So to avoid the problems this duplication causes I've reverted the changes. 

Regards Bernard.
aceman444 (2021-06-06 22:28:38+00:00): Zdravim, ako vidite neexistenciu smerovnikov na snimkach Bing? Prosim uvadzajte skutocne zdroje. Dakujem.
mirec240 (2021-06-07 17:57:00+00:00): Zdravím, odstránil / upravil som len to, čo som aj skutočne overil v teréne. V mape je zbytočne veľa kadejakých smerovníkov ktoré boli odstránené aj pred 10 rokmi, prípadne také, ktoré neexistujú a nemajú uveného správcu ani žiadne ďalšie údaje.
mirec240 (2021-06-07 18:02:47+00:00): + k uvádzaniu zdroja, už som bol poučený a budem uvádzať ako zdroj aj ˝survey˝
skquinn (2021-04-23 09:30:40+00:00): "Made changes around the area I live in" -- this tells us nothing about the purpose of the changeset. I am still waiting on your response to previous inquiries regarding your source of data for the Sugar Land border, even as you have made yet another unexplained change to that border in this changeset.
Enock4seth (2021-05-06 22:19:35+00:00): That was fast for Reinprechsdorfer Straße for U2+U5  :)
Stefan Nagy (2021-05-07 08:03:53+00:00): Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what you are saying… :) Do you think we should pick another name for the construction site because it looks like there's already a subway station?
Enock4seth (2021-05-07 08:37:16+00:00): No, you are right. I mean you were quick in adding it :) This is fine. May be 'U2/U5' in the name? doesn't make much difference.
Stefan Nagy (2021-05-07 09:49:11+00:00): Oh, I get it - thanks :) As far as I know this will only be a U2 station (see https://www.wienerlinien.at/o/imgformat/2113493/lightbox-image/79em), so I think "U2/U5" in the name could be confusing.
Enock4seth (2021-05-07 10:06:17+00:00): Oh, Thanks :) Happy mapping!
Aleksa M (2021-04-23 11:25:49+00:00): Mislim da nisu potrebne adrese na kojima nema zgrada, čak i ako postoje u katastru, iz razloga što zbunjuju na mapi, a takođe i OSM ima pravilo (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Verifiability) koje kaže da se ne mapiraju stvari koje fizički ne postoje. Tako da, mislim da je bolje da se uklone. U velikom broju slučajeva podržavam zvanične podatke na OSM-u, ali ovde to stvara zabunu.
lazanet (2021-04-23 14:41:18+00:00): Е то, зато метнух ово чудо за review јер нисам био сигуран, а видех да их неке остале мапе приказују.

Ништа, онда ћу их макнути.
Aleksa M (2021-04-23 14:57:06+00:00): Da, primetio sam, hvala ti.

Pozdrav
Ludhiana (2021-04-22 21:04:05+00:00): Your are doing good work! Does adding a changeset comment really bothers you too much?
Tonza_ (2021-10-04 12:46:45+00:00): Yes, absolutely
opendcc (2024-02-02 07:34:47+00:00): Warum darf man über den Spielplatz nicht drüber gehen? (access=no); erscheint mir unglaubwürdig - hast Du ev. einen Hinweis, der das belegt?
Knopfauge (2024-02-04 10:27:04+00:00): Sorry, war falsch gekennzeichnet.
Tresho (2021-04-24 09:45:54+00:00): Ciao, perché le bici devono smontare? Non c'è nessun cartello sul posto
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103437392
Ghostraider (2021-04-24 20:28:12+00:00): Ciao!
Vero, non risulta esserci un cartello sul posto, ma impostando bycicle=yes il tratto risulta interpretato dal layer "Mappa ciclabile" come pista ciclabile, cosa non vera in quanto il tratto è sterrato e non è decisamente idoneo per tutti i tipi di bicilette come una vera e propria pista ciclabile. Quale potrebbe essere l'indicazione corretta? Definire il tipo di pavimentazione?
Tresho (2021-04-25 16:12:27+00:00): Mi sono confrontato con altri mapper e alla fine è corretto tenere bicycle=dismount visto che c'è un cartello di divieto di transito ad uno dei due estremi della strada, il quale non si applica ai pedoni
philippec (2021-04-23 15:25:42+00:00): Hassel Kiewit
Kunt u de aed ook juist plaatsen, de foto zegt niet genoeg.
jozin-belgium (2022-01-25 19:18:39+00:00): De AED is toch juist geplaatst.
philippec (2022-01-25 21:30:01+00:00): Nu wel, dankzij den Tonny.
Bekijk de geschiedenis van het punt.
user_5359 (2021-04-25 04:59:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short inquiry to the key service_times: the services are held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case add a Su (followed by space character) at the beginning of the value. Please notice also: We use the 24h notation for time informations.
Mark of Lake County CA (2021-04-25 05:43:52+00:00): Thank you. I updated the information. However, I wasn't sure if the note about 24h notation met to remove the colon or not. While in the military, I wrote it without the colon, so I did so here when I updated.
user_5359 (2021-04-25 05:52:06+00:00): We write the time with colon (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:service_times). I have modified this.
rimezin (2021-04-25 11:41:09+00:00): After a closer look, I see now what you mean now about the old railroad down by river road - it does appear to be obscured by trees. However I don't see on satelite where the railroad you have remarked goes through homes and other buildings... Can you elaborate on this?
RussNelson (2021-04-26 02:10:39+00:00): There might be a few buildings built on the railbed. Many railroad tracks were lifted in the 1960's and 1970's. That's what led to the rails-to-trails act being passed in Congress. Railroads abandoned previous to then were often sold to the highest bidder, often the adjacent property owner. You can usually see where the railroad went, though.
rimezin (2021-04-26 10:08:24+00:00): Interesting, that's for that information. I went out yesterday to take a look. Aside from the buildings, unfortunately most of the places where the rail bed probably was are completely grown over or blended in with grass. It's pretty difficult to tell even in places where there is a clearing, such as where you had indicated it ran along river road - there it seemed like any other swampy ditch. It was an interesting hunt, though! The only remnants I found were on Gorham road, that were embedded in the pavement - I left that indication on the map.
RussNelson (2021-04-27 15:43:54+00:00): I can see the railroad embankment on the LIDAR, so while you can't see it through the trees, it's there. I'll put it back. I'd appreciate you not deleting it without talking to me first.
rimezin (2021-04-27 22:24:31+00:00): According to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned a grassy, overgrown swamp-like ditch that barely qualifies as a "clearing" and isn't otherwise distinguishable in any way doesn't meet the criteria for an abandoned railway. Note the description states "its still visible that there used to be a railway." After physically going out there and tracking from the Seneca Canalway Trail Head, following the previously-marked path all the way down River Road and up to the lumberyard on Kingdom Road, I assure you there are no indications of a former railway (other than the wooden bridge and the embedded tracks on Gorham Street - which I left alone). I took pictures if you'd like to see them. That being said, if you'd like to add back the parts that LIDAR says exist in the wooded areas - go for it. But I can 100% assure you there are no remnants of railway that go through town, so I'd appreciate it if you didn't add anything back there without travelling out to Waterloo yourself and finding a railway in person.
RussNelson (2021-05-16 02:34:09+00:00): I went to Waterloo. I found where the railway went. I have photos. I have added the railway back. You missed a bunch of things, like railway crossing markers, a bridge, more rails in pavement, grassy verges which are obviously a railbed.

I understand that you don't want to map what you can't see. That does NOT mean that you should delete things that other people CAN see.

In respect of your desire to not map what isn't there, I have marked the places where I didn't see any railway with railway=dismantled. I hope this satisfies you.

LIDAR: https://orthos.dhses.ny.gov/?Extent=-8556501.232642915,5295760.517200517,-8551950.840802692,5297764.600535922&layerGroups=AdministrativeBoundaries,DEMIndexes,Orthoimagery&baseMap=hillshade

Photos: https://www.facebook.com/groups/abandonedrails/permalink/4359180144115467/?__cft__[0]=AZWmK6ugp13QUM0RzEPuioDVZuENuX0_KslwUWyrWy1yzSBU-3gOkr3ZRn4XNdOIwaNFCttIij3wzSsrjyIJT8iWTuIyDOApDwUTNsLnjOEI1-vx95yI5MFI9yUUtgSHSXB9h7KgIyKRv0em9YCE0GvF&__tn__=%2CO%2CP-R
rimezin (2021-05-16 03:10:40+00:00): Russ: it's not about satisfying me. Like you said, it's about not mapping something that isn't there. Yet, you continue to mark a no-longer existent railroad, dismantled or not, that crosses through buildings, fences, and other features - and yet (as you said) YOU CAN NO LONGER SEE ANY SIGN OF RAILROAD. So why mark it?

By the river where this is a (mild) impression on lidar? Sure, knock yourself out - map the impression. But mapping through the center of town is pointless if it's not there in any shape or form. It doesn't meet the definition of dismantled, which suggests that some remnant is left behind. You can't possibly tell me that the people that live in those homes want a non-existent railroad going through their house on the map.
rimezin (2021-05-16 03:33:30+00:00): Russ: I realize my previous comment may come off as hostile, I apologize for that. What I mean to say is if you'd like to map the former rail by the river where there is the embankment, I think that would be appropriate and you should do so. But in the village where houses and other structures intersect, I do not think any marking would be appropriate, and I encourage you to remove it. I merely wish to advocate for an accurate and useful map for other users. Thank you for your collaboration.
RussNelson (2021-05-16 12:45:07+00:00): Dismantled means that I looked and found nothing left. But it gets put into the map because there was a railroad there, and just because *I* don't see anything, that doesn't mean nothing is there.

Heck, even abandoned railroads aren't in the main OSM rendering, so I'm not sure what your concern is. Even a specialized rendering like you get from OSMAnd (and only when you ask for it) doesn't include dismantled portions. The reason to include both abandoned and dismantled railroads is so that researchers and trail-builders know what is what.

I'm not sure what your concern is. My concern is to preserve information. Yours seems to be deleting information. Could you maybe stop?
eggie (2021-04-23 05:41:06+00:00): Dag M-G12
Wanneer je goed kijkt zie je een los stukje http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=103438538

Plakken aan landuse kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-23 05:45:27+00:00): Het pad heb ik losgemaakt van de landuse en dat loze stukje doorverbonden.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-04-23 05:48:05+00:00): Reviw.. Lijkt me oke zo.. 
gr eggie
eggie (2021-04-23 05:50:07+00:00): Je vraagt feedback.. 
Lijkt me oke..  De stukken bos heb ik samengevoegd.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-04-23 05:52:43+00:00): Je vraagt feedback  Volgens de BGT omtrekgericht loopt je stukje pad door een sloot. 
Wellicht nog eens checken.
MVG
eggie
EnumMapper (2021-04-22 21:46:07+00:00): source: knowledge
SomeoneElse (2021-04-24 12:02:29+00:00): Hello,
What does "source: knowledge" mean, and how did you come by that knowledge?  Have you visited these places and seen signs with the name in Chinese?
Best Regards,
Andy
EnumMapper (2021-04-28 21:37:57+00:00): Hello @SomeoneElse,

Well, by knowledge I mean common knowledge. Chinese is my first language and these places are well known
SomeoneElse (2021-04-28 21:56:18+00:00): Thanks - normally the tag for that is "local_knowledge".
EnumMapper (2021-04-22 21:50:24+00:00): 朝鲜 is common name (but not official) in Simplified Chinese
Jrachi (2021-04-22 22:16:49+00:00): Puoi togliere il tag sport.
Si applica solo dove fai quelle attività.
Esempio sport=soccer può essere in un campo da pallone (leisure=pitch)
kartler175 (2021-04-23 09:47:31+00:00): Please consider correct mapping of areas before you continue:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-75.65656&lat=45.53316&zoom=13&opacity=0.95
Nic727 (2021-04-23 13:02:55+00:00): Alright thank you.
Nic727 (2021-04-24 02:24:24+00:00): I don't really understand the duplicate layer thing. My goal was to separate the wood in different parts because it's way too large, but I didn't know any other way than drawing a line and using outer/inner on the line. However, I removed the duplicate line for the moment.
Carnildo (2021-04-23 02:23:33+00:00): Please pay more attention to what RapiD is telling you to do: in three cases, you've mapped multiple buildings as one, and in one case, you've mapped two buildings as attached when they're actually separate.
snarkyclarky (2021-04-23 02:31:45+00:00): With RapiD there can potentially be some very small mistakes such as building grouping that you’ve pointed out due to varying proximities and satellite imagery. As a fellow contributor you are more than welcome to edit the map to fix anything you see unfit. Thank you!
Carnildo (2021-04-23 02:41:25+00:00): "Some very small mistakes" is understating it.  In my experience with RapiD, it's got about a 10% error in the sort of area you've been mapping -- one building detection out of every ten is bad.
snarkyclarky (2021-04-23 02:52:57+00:00): Based on the area you’re denoting it looks like the building errors are very insignificant to the locale. This doesn’t seem to be any cause for alarm or any interference with core features. While using RapiD I try my best to phase out any errors I see, but may not be able to catch all of them. As a fellow mapper who seems to be very dedicated to small details of the map, I highly encourage you to fix anything you see unfit. Happy mapping!
user_2066394 (2021-04-23 14:50:18+00:00): place=hamlet ist komplett weg?
MisterCashMachine (2021-04-23 17:26:31+00:00): Die korrekte Bezeichnung des Weilers ist "Kerschlach". Siehe: https://www.gemeinde-paehl.de/Ortsteile.n19.html
user_2066394 (2021-04-23 18:04:19+00:00): Du hast place=hamlet gelöscht und nicht auf den Umriss übertragen, wenn ich das richtig sehe?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/294565982
MisterCashMachine (2021-04-23 18:15:03+00:00): Hatte einen neuen place=hamlet "Kerschlach" angelegt (westlich vom Parkplatz).
user_2066394 (2021-04-23 18:20:32+00:00): Ok, gesehen. Warum neu erstellen? Damit geht die Versionsgeschiche verloren, Verschieben keine Option?
user_2066394 (2021-04-23 20:07:36+00:00): Zurückgeholt und verschoben.
SomeoneElse (2021-04-22 22:22:41+00:00): The comment here was supposed to be "post revert tidying, after https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103424173"
habi (2021-04-27 10:02:08+00:00): Hey
In this chagenset you've introduced a bunch of `176=72` tags on several objects (http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/16FJ)

Maybe this is a typo, would you care to correct this?

Have a great day,
habi

PS: I came from http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
tars4815 (2021-04-24 18:58:49+00:00): Presta sempre attenzione alla forma dell'edificio soprattutto nei casi in cui questa presenta più di semplici 4 vertici. Traccia bene il bordo dell'elemento seguendo l'andamento dei muri perimetrali visibili nell'immagine. Grazie per l'attenzione, spero che questo consiglio si possa rivelare utile. Buona serata :)
- Federica x Wikimedia Italia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103440299
zorque (2021-06-17 10:31:44+00:00): just a note: waterways in OSM should have the same flow direction as the actual river. In this changeset it was not always the case. Fixed it
mapitero (2021-06-17 13:48:31+00:00): Hi zorque, 

Thanks for the heads up and the fix! 

I don't edit waterways (my edits are mainly roads). Sometimes, some roads I add pass through an waterway, so I have to add bridge or tunnel, and therefore it may look like it was me, but I wasn't.

Anyway, I'm glad you're fixing those wrong directions (I see lot of them but I don't fix because I'm not sure in which direction they should flow)!

Great job!

Best,
Matheus
tars4815 (2021-04-24 18:54:21+00:00): Ottimo lavoro, Tullia! :)
- Federica x WikiMedia Italia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103440517
skorasaurus (2021-04-23 18:45:09+00:00): hi kyle, thanks for your edits, they generally look really good but one suggestion in the future is to use for the service=parking_aisle tag for the north/south portion of the ways that are in parking lots - (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/934085679)  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Dparking_aisle has more information on it.  

regards,
will in cleveland
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/103441048
kylebakerpa05 (2021-04-24 15:38:14+00:00): alright thank you
VictorIE (2021-06-25 11:18:35+00:00): Hi,

This is an ordinary footway.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/931132223#map=17/53.30564/-6.32676

You have it marked
access=no as if it is a military site. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=no?uselang=en-GB