piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nevw (2020-12-06 00:56:20+00:00): woodpeck, am I sure?.. no, but I do like to convey a conviction that experienced mappers in Aus prefer these type of wooded areas in towns be tagged with natural=wood and/or landcover=trees. In general, groups of trees  in parks are usually remnant gumtree or other natives and are rarely pruned except for safety from large limb fall if damaged.
I am eager to see the landcover tags be rendered in the standard osm layer and would prefer those over natural or landuse tags for dense urban lawn and tree covered areas.
I would like to see the landuse=forest be better defined in the wiki to convey to mappers that it is essentially land used for forestry operations or other more actively managed tree use but this continues to be contentious.
SekeRob (2020-11-19 10:17:42+00:00): Do not quite understand why the roundabout has to be a single circle when e.g. the bus routes passing do not us/touch certain sections. Of all the existing, none in fact seem to go across the piece between the northern side on and off of Corso Umberto I. Also, this has potential of breaking on and off turn restrictions. E.g. 16 Montesilvano FS comes off Gaspari, goes on and off again northbound only using half the roundabout.
Plz elucidate.
SekeRob (2020-11-19 10:31:21+00:00): BTW, I've seen this now happening on several rotondas, another to name at Pindaro/SS16, and, maybe coincidentally, it seems Flixbus is in the neighborhood.
sovereign_ch (2020-11-19 12:45:35+00:00): There is virtually no reason to split roundabouts, except for changes in physical properties (two-lane sections and one-lane sections in the same roundabout). It's not recommended, let alone required by the wiki, and it's not even necessary for route-Relations.

Such splitting is cosmetical (aka tagging for the renderer), so please do it either properly, without triggering errors in OSMI and PTNA across half Europe, or leave it.

Also, there weren't turn restrictions on the roundabout, this would have triggered conflict resolution in JOSM (unlike in iD).
SekeRob (2020-11-19 14:01:10+00:00): I suppose with the hundreds of samples I seen in the region of segmentized roundabouts, me being originally merging them and getting slapped in the face by the very route/turn restrictions caused me to reconsider the practise. Routing a bus route and having a silly full circle show even when it's an immediate on and off, a long right turn so to speak. At least I consider this far from mapping for renderer. Just because there was not a conflict is certainly not a justification to just plow ahead, because by these actions you inhibit implementing those restrictions, in fact have 2 new roundabouts on hand where certain traffic is forbidden to take certain turn actions. As yet no advise how to map that. Anyway, you stating this triggers routing issues across half of Europe does confirm, we're not mapping for it to be proper but for Flixbus etc convenience. There seems to be more of that convenience going around regrettable... don't map because it shakes up the applecart.
Have a nice day.
sovereign_ch (2020-11-19 21:23:59+00:00): And still you're somehow totally missing the point.

Someone took the time to properly set up "public transportation" routes – frankly I don't care if that was a paid job or not. Neither do I care if it's Flix, or TI, or Thello, or a local bus operator or whoever. The point is, that's hours of work were put into those relations, per line and direction. And the nice thing is that PTv2 (being one of the OSM-internally defined things, that don't care about rendering or routing, but just for the scheme of use [of OSM-objects]) has a logical definition, that can be surveyed. Or, I can load any route-relation into JOSM and tell if it's messed up, or not. OSMI or PTNA are just tools addressing those issues, that need attention.

Often it's iD that messes things up, but even JOSM isn't fool proof, and I have to re-check my own changes twice or trice.

And still it's not impossible, there are mappers, that manage to split up a roundabout, and tidy up 30 relations without causing havoc. It's a matter of reading and understanding the manual, and investing the extra time, to do the extra work.

Why exactly are your 5 to 10 minutes of time more valuable, than anyone elses's 15 to 30 minutes, to do the job properly?!
SekeRob (2020-11-22 16:22:31+00:00): Plz be aware change set https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94588639#map=18/42.47140/14.20154
Left a note on the right turn and Via Tiziano shortcut, latter prohibited to be taken and thusly has to be removed, uninterrupted white line. Added turn relation restriction. Your drivers should know departing Pescara.
cheers.
Frans S (2020-11-30 14:26:53+00:00): Hello . Thanks for mapping here.
A few remark, You mapped from BING. This is an old imagery. Please use the project imagery or Maxar .
Also map each building individually and square each rectangular building
See my PM as well
Best regards
eggie (2020-11-19 07:43:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Tip: Je kunt source=BAG;local_knowledge taggen.. Dan blijft de kadasterinfo in stand. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-11-19 07:48:17+00:00): Scholen zijn lastig. Er is al een adresnode. Beter niet nogmaals een adres op het gebouw zelf zetten. Ook niet op het terrein. 
De naam kan in dit geval het beste op het schoolterrein. 
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-11-19 08:02:14+00:00): De duplikaat adressen heb ik verwijderd.De naam staat nu 1x op het terrein.
mvg,
eggie
3ngineer (2020-11-19 06:17:49+00:00): This looks like spam. You added "North Pole" as a city and as a church name.
Carnildo (2020-11-19 18:06:00+00:00): "North Pole, Alaska" is a real place, and it's not unreasonable to expect it to have a church: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Pole,_Alaska
3ngineer (2020-11-19 18:14:34+00:00): Wow, amazing! Please excuse my lack of research.
nevw (2020-11-19 02:57:46+00:00): Hi
you added all your business cdetails to the glass building part which is incorrect. 
I added all your business details to a separate point. You may like to shift the business location to nearer your shop location within the building.
nevw (2020-11-19 03:05:09+00:00): I also fixed the phone format for Australian phone numbers in OSM.
Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines
Also the addr:unit=Level tag appears to me to be not specific for customers to locate where you are.
rojjodo (2020-12-10 18:08:11+00:00): Hi,
You seem to have tagged FP21 from its junction with Tailors down to St James Way as bicycle=designated on the basis of the East Herts planning options document. The only place in that document that I can find that looks like FP21 is on map 3M. Map 3M has multiple errors including showing bridleway BR82 as a footpath and showing footpath FP21 as cycle + pedestrian, which contradicts the Herts RoW map. The signposts at both ends of this section of FP21 both indicate that this is a Public Footpath and I can find no evidence on the ground that there is any cycle rights. I therefore think that this should be tagged as a footpath with bicycle=no. Do you have any verifiable (and legally usable) evidence that it is accessible on bicycles?
Regards
Bob Dean
beatpoet (2020-12-10 19:37:55+00:00): Uhhh, I guess not, do what you think is right with it!
rojjodo (2020-12-10 22:01:37+00:00): Hi,

Thanks, I'll make it look like a footpath.
I'm sorry about the tone of my previous message, I must stop typing messages into the small box where I can't see what I've written.
I don't know if you saw the report that SUSTRANS prepared for the Stortford Town Council on cycling and walking. It had some really good ideas for improving cycling routes through the town, but I suspect that not much will happen because they all cost money.
Regards
Bob Dean
beatpoet (2020-12-11 15:57:01+00:00): No probs, it was just alot of information! I haven't seen that Sustrans report, and I stay well away from the town while cycling, but aside from making some of the lesser-travelled wider footpaths shared use, I can't see any way of improving the situation for peds/cyclists without turning the place into one big permanent traffic jam.
rojjodo (2020-12-11 17:57:55+00:00): If the Stortford report is of interest, you can find it buried as Appendix 3 in <https://www.bishopsstortfordtc.gov.uk/document_library/Agendas%20and%20Minutes%20-%20Localism%20and%20Strategy%20Committee%202018/LS180305%20Agenda%20Attachments%20and%20Minutes%2005%20Mar%2018/LS180305%20Agenda%20and%20Attachments%2005%20Mar%2018.pdf> starting at page 15. It's 100+ pages long.
Regards
Bob Dean
beatpoet (2020-12-11 21:44:25+00:00): Cheers man, but forget it, too much waffle! The cycleway between Birchanger and the airport is a good start, but there's no safe/easy route via bike between Stortford and Birchanger! Birchanger Woods are too muddy and messy when it's not summer. Heading out to the west, I hear a cycleway will be put alongside the (soon to become the old) A120 heading down to Little Hadham, but not putting a cycleway alongside the new bypass is a dumb idea.
Ludhiana (2021-04-11 11:59:31+00:00): Why are you vandalizing the power line name https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148142834/history ?
ralley (2020-11-19 03:11:21+00:00): Why have you added layer=1 to the two buildings?  Is it an attempt to correct warnings about crossing the river?  Because it appears the river is position wrongly
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94401304
marc__marc (2023-06-26 22:23:55+00:00): Bonjour,
je vois une série de marqueur avec fixme=a vérifier mais sanss aucune autre info le fixme est un peu bancal : que veux-tu vérifier ?
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1wCw
Cordialement,
Marc
fgouget (2023-06-27 15:18:02+00:00): J'ai crée ces marqueurs en me basant sur les photos aériennes. Pour la plupart on les voit bien mais pour ceux que j'ai marqués "À vérifier" ce n'est pas si clair. Donc pour bien faire il faudrait vérifier "sur place" qu'il s'agit bien de marqueurs gaz, notamment pour les "pedestal".

J'ai commencé à mettre ces commentaires à jour pour clarifier mais il en reste encore pas mal.
OSMPossum (2020-11-19 01:09:44+00:00): Correction: An offset of (10.82; 4.85) , Strava was used
Kseniya_Nekrasava (2020-11-25 09:20:26+00:00): Hi! Your edits look like not good enough. Please, use dates of OpenStreetMap Wiki for the mapping and right tags. Good luck!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94401486
DaveF (2020-11-19 23:59:52+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM.
This is not a bridge.
level 0 is the assumed default so no need to add. Please revert
Carnildo (2020-11-19 18:08:00+00:00): I don't think the entire area is a single building.  You probably want to use the "apartment complex" tag here.
keithonearth (2020-11-19 01:25:02+00:00): I often see sidewalks tagged `highway=cycleway`, by editors that seem to value mapping features of interest to cyclists. I think it is unhelpful to map bicycle infrastructure as better than reality, tagging the sidewalks of the Knight Street Bridge as cycleways is an example. The sidewalks seem to be the same age as the bridge, and give little consideration to cyclists, as they are not wide enough to pass a pedestrian. The signage directing cyclists to use the sidewalks does not change the fact that they are sidewalks. The exception are the sections of actual cycleways that lead northbound cyclists down to SE Marine Dr. 

It is not useful to map them all the same, as much as I'd like there to be good cycleways crossing the Knight St Bridge.
OSMPossum (2020-11-19 02:14:32+00:00): Correction: Yandex Panorama was used for this edit
MikeN (2021-02-17 12:22:55+00:00): Hi, the roads on the upper deck are not bus lanes, but just a standard parking deck.   I have corrected this.
MikeN (2021-02-17 13:05:09+00:00): Please correct your program BusLanes, as this is the second time it has made this same mistake.
user_136804 (2020-11-28 23:45:31+00:00): I didn't know there was any official ref for these trails!  I'm curious what the source for these codes is.
ToniE (2020-11-19 11:45:16+00:00): Hello asnghpi,

could you please verify whether this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/874468448 is really a oneway route?

I doubt this, many bus routes are now hereading this oneway way into wrong directions. Furthermore, it still has lanes=2 and it still is highway=tertiary and there is no othereasy route which could be used to drive from east to west

Thanks
Toni
ToniE (2020-11-19 11:45:46+00:00): hereading --> using
MKnight (2020-11-19 18:41:23+00:00): reverted in #94455500
MKnight (2020-11-19 18:45:53+00:00): wo mir grad einfällt, dass ich demletzt mich irgendwo über ein Schild "Umleitung Marcel-Paul-Strasse" wunderte. Mist.
Andererseits ist der Weimarer ÖPNV immer recht zügig, solche Umleitungen einzupflegen.
Ich mach mein revert rückgängig.
ToniE (2020-11-19 18:53:23+00:00): Hi asnghpi,

according to MKnight, this could be a temporary deviation. Do you have any information, imagery which shows why such a road is suddenly turned into a oneway and for how long?

BR
Toni
ToniE (2020-11-19 18:57:36+00:00): it is temporary and finished at 2020-11-27:

https://stadt.weimar.de/aktuell/presse/mitteilung/bushaltestellen-im-bereich-der-marcel-paul-strasse-allstedter-strasse-werden-barrierefrei/

And they say there: road is completely blocked not just a oneway

But why does Amazon-Logistics map so weird? Not the first time though!
ToniE (2020-11-19 19:00:57+00:00): solved with

access:conditional = no @ (2020 Oct 19-2020 Nov 27)
ErraticThunder (2020-11-20 10:00:04+00:00): Hi ToniE/Mknight, 
Thanks for looking into the edit. I have edited based on internal driver feedback and the Straight on sign board (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=g-45qwj-kc-KgOwutwYmfw&focus=photo) visible in overlay. I have misinterpreted the sign board for the complete road instead of the lane. My sincere apologies on the miss from my end. Thanks for modifying the edits as per local knowledge. Going forward I will keep a tab on these points in my future edits. 
Regards, 
asnghpi
ToniE (2020-11-20 10:08:55+00:00): Hi asnghpi,

thanks for the feedback.

There are two indications that this is a temporary restriction:

1) see the yellow sign at the right "Umleitung" which means "Detour"/"Redirection" and this is usually set when there are temporary constructions which limit the access

2.) the sign "straight on" (not: "oneway") is not fixed/anchored into the ground but rather mounted into a socket so that the sign can easily be (re)moved - same for the "Umleitung" sign though

Best regards
Toni
ToniE (2020-11-20 10:11:53+00:00): ... and the imagery is as of Oct 12, 2019, so the temporary signs should have been removed in the meantime.

BR
Toni
ErraticThunder (2020-11-20 10:30:54+00:00): Hi Toni, 
We appreciate you on the constructive discussion and yes I notice that these boards are be temporary restrictions and I missed them while editing from my end. Thanks for the information. I will consider this learning in my future edits. Happy to learn from Community. 😊
Regards, 
asnghpi
ToniE (2020-11-20 10:42:38+00:00): You're welcome!

Br
Toni
MKnight (2020-11-20 16:48:22+00:00): Moin,
ich hab mir das nochmal live angeschaut, und es ist tatsächlich eine Vollsperrung.
MKnight (2020-12-25 09:22:36+00:00): gewesen...
Glassman (2020-11-19 06:26:47+00:00): Tip: square buildings by selecting the outline they just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/94402702
Dimacn (2020-11-30 12:24:16+00:00): Скажите пожалуйста, такими точками вы отмечаете отдельные реальные деревья?
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:54:47+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:55:00+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Dimacn (2020-11-27 01:17:23+00:00): Вы случайно переместили точку 1589135206 тем самым сломали геометрию дорог. Пожалуйста будьте аккуратнее, не портите карту. Я уже исправил эту ошибку.
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:55:13+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:55:26+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:55:43+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:57:45+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
tastrax (2020-12-06 05:32:18+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:58:03+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:58:20+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2021-04-16 16:58:35+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!