piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Maloss34 (2025-08-23 17:47:11+00:00): Ciao, ti scrivo solo perché inserita nel tuo gruppo di modifiche #101366846, sto parlando della chiesa di sant’antonio (Venarotta) , identificata erroneamente come “Edicola Votiva” (in realtà è una piccola chiesa con il suo campanile) inoltre non capisco perché si veda nella pagina destinata alle  modifiche ma non nella mappa OSM (è rimasta in sospeso?) 
https://venarottaturismo.it/punti-di-interesse/chiesa-di-santantonio-dei-guai-e-croce-del-giubileo/
totera (2025-08-25 15:08:47+00:00): Ciao, a quanto vedo era stata inserita da un altro utente, io avevo modificato soltanto il nome. Adesso provo a sistemarla
Maloss34 (2025-08-25 15:17:35+00:00): si lo so... ma ti ho scritto perchè so che tratti il territorio di Ascoli con molta accuratezza
DUGA (2024-11-05 17:24:22+00:00): The buildings you added here are straightforward garbage.
archpdx (2021-07-08 02:09:15+00:00): Hi davegis,
It seems you've tagged what looks like a backyard putting green as a golf course (See https://www.osm.org/way/919599926). This could be tagged with golf=green + landuse=grass.

-archpdx
skquinn (2021-03-22 18:25:59+00:00): Hi,

In the future, it would help if your changeset comment reflects the entirety of what was added in that changeset. OsmAnd apparently overwrites the comment each time even if you leave it open. (This is arguably a bug, though it should be noted OsmAnd wasn't made with the primary purpose of being an editor.)

I personally add one item per changeset when using OsmAnd because of this. You may want to look at Vespucci as an alternative.

Thanks and happy mapping!

--Shawn
koriander (2021-08-21 08:49:20+00:00): Hallo Rosalo, schön, dass du in der gleichen Gegend wie ich kartierend unterwegs bist :) Mir ist aufgefallen, dass du in ein paar Elemente gelöscht hast, was mit Informationsverlust einher ging. Ich nehme an, das geschah in guter Absicht. Für die Mapper, die die einzelnen Elemente erstellt haben, ist es aber wahrscheinlich nicht so schön. Wenn Wege nicht mehr begangen werden dürfen, sind sie ja trotzdem noch da und sollten dementsprechend einfach mit Acces-Tags, wie foot=no getaggt werden. Außerdem sind nicht alle Wege, die in diesem Changeset gelöscht wurden illegal - und auch inoffizielle Wege sind Teil der Realität, die OSM versucht abzubilden. Generell ist es nett vor größeren Löschungen die ursprünglichen Mapper anzuschreiben. Gibt es hier Gründe, die für eine Löschung sprechen, die ich gerade übersehe? Falls nicht, würde ich die Wege in den nächsten Tagen wieder einpflegen. Lieben Gruß, koriander
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
Rotflamingo2 (2021-04-07 15:10:39+00:00): Hallo wermak, das System meldet in Kleinheubach Kollision Hauptstr. und Rüdenauer Bach. Ich habe keine Ortskenntnisse für eine Korrektur.
ElliottPlack (2021-03-21 02:34:36+00:00): This is great work! Nice GPS too. Today I met with PVSP head ranger Joe and FPVSP management to get more people that manage  the park involved with the mapping of it, via trail naming, area naming, access, etc. Looks like you're committed to doing great trail mapping at PVSP. Would you want to get involved in a future mapathon?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101372608
ElliottPlack (2021-03-22 16:50:09+00:00): I've got another area in PVSP that needs some good survey. There is a trail that begins in EC at the end of Red Stag Ct and continues down into Ilchester. We're trying to update that area for the new PTAP Traverse trail. Could you take a look with your high-accuracy GPS?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/920975061
fortchagos (2021-03-22 17:54:30+00:00): Mapathon may be possible sometime later this Spring.  I'm busy the next few weekends.  I'm working my way west.  I've pretty much knock out the Avalon area and now working toward the Orange Grove area.  I was actually going to hit that up today but may not make it.
ElliottPlack (2021-03-22 17:58:45+00:00): Excellent! I just tweaked it a little with the Strava heatmap source in JOSM. Still an average though. I appreciate your efforts. If not today, going to be a few nice days this week :)
user_5359 (2021-03-20 07:55:30+00:00): Hello (again)! Please use the key building instead of BUILDING! I have correct this typo. 

Bonjour (encore) ! Veuillez utiliser la clé building au lieu de BUILDING ! J'ai corrigé cette faute de frappe.
pra_veen (2021-04-01 08:58:51+00:00): Hi mapper,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons 
overlapping with teritary road 
way 919604971 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102109487 
Kindly refer the link above
Thank You
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101372768
czubi (2021-04-25 13:41:43+00:00): Hallo moenchii, du hast in Tröchtelborn mit deinem letzten Changeset leider ein ziemliches Chaos angerichtet. Viele der Adressen gibt es jetzt mehrmals, einige sogar 5x. Das stellt leider keine Verbesserung dar. Magst du das bitte wieder berichtigen? Danke
Ale_Zena_IT (2021-03-23 09:02:52+00:00): Hello,
it's not clear to me why in a very small changeset you need to edit Borneo and USA. I'm checking some edit in Somalia and I come across so many edits (not just yours,... many) working in remote areas
wolfgang8741 (2021-03-22 21:22:06+00:00): Buildings in this and many other change sets in this area are not well oriented to the buildings on the ground. Are you just importing or have you been reviewing the alignment before adding the buildings?
Andrea Musuruane (2021-03-20 08:53:23+00:00): Ciao. Se l'edificio è una chiesa deve essere etichettato con building=church, nel caso l'edificio fosse più piccolo, con building=chapel. Inoltre, il nome in OSM si deve inserire nella sua interezza e senza abbreviazioni. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101373926
popilen (2021-03-20 16:00:33+00:00): Fatto
Andrea Musuruane (2021-03-20 17:41:25+00:00): Ciao, devi specificare il nome completo. Quindi "Chiesa della Santissima Annunziata" e non solo "Santissima Annunziata". Ciao, Andrea
Marc_ch (2022-11-03 17:34:29+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129118913/history
quel est votre source pour le changement de nom ?
Salutations,
Marc
eric6quatre (2022-11-03 18:15:56+00:00): Bonsoir,
Swisstopo
Salutations
Marc_ch (2022-11-03 23:00:22+00:00): Bonsoir,
En cas de divergence entre le terrain et un opendata, osm privilégie pourtant le terrain (changeset précédent source=survey, plaque sur place encore vue ce soir, je contacterai la commune d'Avences pour voir si elle est motiviée à faire corriger l'erreur dans les registres cantonaux et fédéraux)
Salutations,
Marc
Jarek 🚲 (2021-03-20 03:49:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8539690842 was an accident in editor, sorry
Glassman (2021-03-21 20:33:17+00:00): I usually don't connect areas with well mapped sidewalks to the street except at crossings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101374458
Marc_ch (2021-04-15 21:01:48+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/333038505
le nom propre de ce lieu n'est pas cimetière. cimetière est le nom commun qui est déjà décrit par l'attribut landuse=cemetery
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Names#Name_est_juste_le_nom
Salutations,
Marc
eric6quatre (2021-04-15 21:24:24+00:00): Bonjour,
Effectivement merci de la remarque.
Meilleures salutations
xkillah (2021-03-21 13:21:47+00:00): почему проспект с большой буквы?
Kuritsyn Roman (2021-03-21 15:15:14+00:00): Использовал официальное название "Проспект Независимости" из приказа
http://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/V08VD000085.
"Проспект" может быть частью имени улицы, так и быть только статусной частью и так же не указывает на тип улицы.
В любом случае: правда на земле, за местными.
Kuritsyn Roman (2021-03-21 15:29:44+00:00): Лучше писать "проспект". Дайте знать если есть необходимость в исправлении, так как в JOSM проще переименовать улицу и адрес у зданий по улице.
xkillah (2021-03-22 07:18:17+00:00): неожиданно. Если в документах так, то пускай будет.
Marc_ch (2022-10-24 15:01:11+00:00): Bonjour,
quel est la source pour "Giratoire des Eterpis" ? car elle entre en conflit avec un avis officiel d'adjudication de l'état de Vaud nomant ce lieu Giratoire de Rueyre.
par ailleurs pourquoi ne pas mettre le nom du giratoire sur le giratoire ?
Salutations,
Marc
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:15:34+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
FvGordon (2021-03-20 07:44:05+00:00): With this changeset you have uploaded duplicate landuses and relations. See this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919256698
from today and this:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919621127
from yesterday. I have already removed some relations and areas which were uploaded today, but there are more. Can you please remove the duplicate landuses, you uploaded today?
Marych_ (2021-03-21 07:48:57+00:00): добрый день
вы залили дубликаты вы базу последними изменениями
наврено придется их удалить
spiregrain (2021-03-29 13:12:37+00:00): Hi there.   In this changeset, you added St. Patrick's Primary School.   I don't think there is any such school - do you have local knowledge of it?

I suspect this is the site of the former "St Patrick's Boys School", which was amalgamated into the nearby "Our Lady and St Patrick Primary School" in 2011.   

Is the old site still used?

Search the DENI site for refs 403-1644, 403-1384 and 403-6693 to see what I mean - http://apps.education-ni.gov.uk/appinstitutes/
spiregrain (2021-04-13 11:13:34+00:00): Having done more desk research, am now happy that this school is no longer there.   Visible only on old ESRI Clarity imagery, not on more recent 2017-era Bing imagery - which shows rubble.   Planning application refers to site as 'former' school site and advised that a petrol station is being proposed (LA07/2020/1588/F).   Dept. of Edu. site refers to the school being amalgamated to form 'Our Lady and St. Patrick PS' on Edward Street.   Have left ways present, with prefix razed:.
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:15:45+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
jqngarcia (2021-03-20 15:53:03+00:00): Hola rsabi, primer gracies per la aportació, peró els edificis els hi falta l'etiqueta building=yes i altres etiquetas com military=bunker, etc. Si tens dubtes la Comunitat d'OSM Català et podem fer un cop de mà.

Salut i Mapes, JQN
ottwiz (2021-03-20 12:37:05+00:00): Hm, a fagyizóról levetted a nevet, érthető, hiszen a fagyizón kívül semmi extra nincsen úgy kint, én igazából csak azért írtam ki azt hogy "Fagylaltozó" mert tényleg az van kint az utcán, manapság én teljesen bejártam Rákospalota Öregfalu szinte minden szegletét (és Rákospalota kertvárosnak is). Ha érdekel, Március 29-én tartani fogok róla OSM hourön előadást :)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hungary/Tal%C3%A1lkoz%C3%B3k/2021-03-29-R%C3%A1kospalota

Ennyi erőből letudnád szedni https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586732039 Berekfürdőn a fagyizót, de nem lenne értelme, szintén azt a helyet én jártam be és vettem fel a POI-kat oda. Így ha nem annyira gond, felvenném újra.
ottwiz (2021-03-20 12:38:02+00:00): javítok, van rajta a Fagylaltozó alatt szöveg, csak én nem minden szöveget viszek fel.
ottwiz (2021-03-20 12:48:15+00:00): Ok, érthető, ha nincsen mondjuk adott brand/cégnév mondjuk..
kogutowicz-mano (2021-03-20 16:11:14+00:00): A "Fagylaltozó" az nem a _neve_ az objektumnak. Hanem a kategóriája. Név az, ami egyedileg megkülönbözteti az azonos csoportba tartozó példányokat.

Az lenne a kérésem, hogy minden attribútumot arra használj, amire való! Ne érezz kényszert, hogy mindent a "name"-be zsúfolj bele! :-)
ottwiz (2021-03-20 16:13:01+00:00): Ok, rendben :D
JasonBob (2024-02-27 23:11:14+00:00): Please do not create your own names for existing places.
user_6110846 (2022-01-27 12:00:50+00:00): возвращен украиснкий во всех обьектах где тьы в name менял украиснкий на росиский язьік 

Прекрати етим заниматся 
украиснкое сообщество  контролирует Донбас чтоб все обьектьі бьіли на украитснком язьіке
gscholz (2021-03-22 06:04:49+00:00): Hi Pedro,
your recent changesets have created several dozens of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.08419&lat=-22.51533&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this?

Regarding cycleways close to streets there is a different set of rules about how to map them properly:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway

Can you please check if these rules apply to your case?
Guido
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 14:35:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103958280 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits believed by the local community to be derived from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4899 .  Some have already been dealt with; this should address the rest.
Morten Lange (2021-03-20 08:02:07+00:00): Thanks. I'm curious as to what was overhasty, though.
Ben97 (2021-03-20 09:14:15+00:00): There were broken multipolygons as the Geldingadalir multipolygon with invalid roles.
user_6110846 (2023-07-09 12:41:22+00:00): перед тим як змінювати стаус доріг - вивчи будь ласкаправила затверджені українською спільнотою 
Дорога обласного значення               / дорога з ref O****** /                       
    у всіх випадках буде мати статус tertiary
tio-Jorge (2023-07-11 19:01:21+00:00): Не тикай мені - зроби як вважаєш за потрібне
frosm (2021-03-26 16:42:22+00:00): Bonjour,
merci pour la correction.
j'ai ajouté la voie de déserte vers loa maison
Bonne continuation
Adam_Piszczek (2021-05-25 07:02:35+00:00): Wygląda na to że będzie tutaj autokomis prywatny.
aharvey (2021-03-22 09:00:22+00:00): How do you decide the extent of this watershed? ie. why Sydney Coast-Georges? I would assumed you'd have a watershed for each coastal outlet but looks like a few have been combined here, how was that decided? If we start saying it's okay to map watersheds that could end up being a lot of areas for each coastal outlet? Does it make sense to actually include this in OSM? There are other ways to query OSM data such that your query object can be outside OSM.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101377566
TheSwavu (2021-03-22 09:25:30+00:00): It's an AWRC catchment boundary, which is what the industry uses. See http://www.bom.gov.au/water/about/riverBasinAuxNav.shtml
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-30 04:09:09+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143342045
BCNorwich (2021-03-20 10:29:56+00:00): Hi welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I removed a section of the path placed on top of an existing track highway. Tagged that section of track as foot=yes.

Regards Bernard.
user_2008655 (2021-11-01 06:17:11+00:00): 我个人认为这样做毫无必要，此地区周围的界线完全可以效仿克里米亚，既然克里米亚半岛地区在OSM被同时划入俄罗斯和乌克兰（前者主张“克里米亚共和国”和“塞瓦斯托波尔联邦直辖市”，后者主张“克里米亚自治共和国”和“塞瓦斯托波尔拉达直辖市”），那又为何该地区不可以？
eggie (2021-03-20 11:24:32+00:00): review.. correct gedaan.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-03-20 11:31:48+00:00): Dag Freek,

Brandgangen achter tuinen tussen de schuurtjes door worden verschillend gedaan.
Echt consensus is er niet.
Meestal als het geen doorgaande route is zet ik die brandgangen op slot met access=private.. Het gaat anders ongewenst routeren.
Vaak worden ze als highway=footway getagd..  Dan routeert het al niet voor fietsers.
Wanneer het als highway=path wordt getagd dan zeker access=private ivm ongewenste routering.
Formeel klopt het want de meeste brandgangen horen bij de eigen grond.  De helft van de brandgang is van mij .. de andere helft van m'n achterbuurman. Het onderhoud dus ook. 
(Recht van overpad voor bewoners en geen openbare weg) 
Er zijn ook mappers die willen die gangetjes helemaal niet op de kaart.

Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2021-03-20 11:33:29+00:00): ... en review... Geen landuse vastmaken aan de pagen en wegen.
De kaart wordt dan onwerkbaar voor anderen en het geeft problemen bij verschuivingen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101379534
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-03-20 11:50:37+00:00): De paden heb ik losgehaald van de landuse. Nu even met witruimte.
Eén groot landuse=grass gebied mag ook, maar daar dan de paden weer los opleggen.  Witruimte hoeft niet, maar wordt meestal bij die parkjes gedaan. 
gr eggie
eggie (2021-03-20 11:51:10+00:00): Tip: Plakken kun je voorkomen door de linker alttoets te gebruiken tijdens intekenen.
abakus_uploader (2021-03-20 23:32:29+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
3Johnny (2021-03-20 09:55:29+00:00): https://www.is.fi/taloussanomat/art-2000007870811.html
tux67 (2021-03-31 15:07:46+00:00): Warum ist der Brunnen gelöscht? Auf den NRW DOPs ist er noch da.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101380450
gendy54 (2021-03-28 23:39:05+00:00): Bonjour Stéphane,

Merci pour l'ajout des défibrillateurs. Si tu as des infos plus précises, tu peux les rajouter via https://projetdumois.fr/projects/2020-09_aed c'est juste une interface de contribution plus conviviale que l'éditeur du site.

Donat
aceman444 (2025-08-19 10:35:30+00:00): Dakujem. Ak je to teda klub, treba aj pridat prislusne znacky, napr. club=sport, sport=canoe.

Zadanie len nazvu na budovu nestaci, nedava to ziadnu informaciu o aky typ objektu ide. To co ste urobili je len nazov budovy, bez toho aby tam nejaky aktivny klub sidlil. Opravim to.

Uvadzajte tiez zdroj udajov, zo snimok Bing ste nazov klubu nezistili.
HSL_HRT (2021-05-18 08:48:34+00:00): natural=wetland? Meniköhän tässä nyt tagitys ihan kuten piti? Olisiko kuitenkin landuse=grass parempi? Täällä näyttää olevan täällä lähistöllä nyt useampiakin kaupunkikosteikkoja luotuna.
Illio (2021-03-20 13:57:33+00:00): Hello, could you add some source that the small crescent is in fact a part of Italy? On a lot of maps it is marked as a part of Vatican.
Alecs01 (2021-03-20 15:58:00+00:00): Hi, see wikipedia in italian for example: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ricciolo_d%27Italia most maps simply ingore it
Illio (2021-03-20 17:51:34+00:00): Thank you. Perhaps that could be added to the source tag at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/919663593
tux67 (2021-03-31 15:19:19+00:00): Ich habe die Gebäudeumrisse nach ALKIS Daten aktualisiert. 

Was die Gebäudeformen (und ggf. Adressen) angeht: Da du iD als editor nutzt, kannst du  diesen Link unter "Bildmaterialquellen" in das Eingabefeld bei “Benutzerdefiniert” (das mit den 3 Punkten übereinander) einfügen:
https://www.wms.nrw.de/geobasis/wms_nw_alkis?BBOX={bbox}&FORMAT=image/png&HEIGHT={height}&LAYERS=adv_alkis_gebaeude&REQUEST=GetMap&SERVICE=WMS&SRS={proj}&STYLES=&TRANSPARENT=TRUE&VERSION=1.1.1&WIDTH={width}

Das sind die ALKIS Daten des Landes NRW (was auch die bevorzugte Quelle ist, es sein denn es ist ein kompletter Neubau (noch nicht in ALKIS) oder das alte Gebäude wurde durch ein neues ersetzt und das neue ist auch noch nicht in ALKIS.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/101381291
user_5359 (2021-03-20 21:35:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745628728 What ist the meaning of roof:shape=0?
Aerond (2021-03-20 21:39:22+00:00): Thanks for letting me know, I meant to do roof:levels=0.
MatthieuGD (2021-03-20 22:15:10+00:00): Bonjour Un Pisciacais et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap,

J'ai réinitialisé quelques ajouts/modifications :
- Le défibrillateur ajouté à côté de la mairie côté café de la paix n'a pas d'existence physique (localisation à côté du cinéma ? je n'en ai pas connaissance en tant que castelnovien)
- Fleurent Bâtiment n'a plus de bureau sur Châteauneuf, de plus l'établissement a cessé l'activité légale. Je l'ai retiré.
- La Galerie Niort existe bien, cependant je l'avais placé historiquement sur le polygone qui couvre une zone trop importante, je suis complètement d'accord pour faire un point, j'ai rajouté les infos que j'avais mis à l'époque sur ton point pour éviter un doublon.

Je reste ouvert pour tout échange ici ou par message privé.

Matthieu
user_12625593 (2021-09-01 08:55:05+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2829325
hatul (2021-11-14 16:40:52+00:00): נכון שאפשר לישון פה, אבל במה הוא עדיף מחניון מישור ימין הסמוך או כל נקודה סמוכה לכביש?
!bm (2021-03-20 13:37:52+00:00): Hallo zilti,

ist hier tatsächlich "Lüske Fischwagen" beschriftet? Das scheint doch teilweise deskriptiv [1] und auf mapillary von 2019 [2] ist hier (von einer Seite) nur "Lüske" zu lesen.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
[2] https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/C_TMb6xiXbFoM5zwf2ISvw

--besteGrüße!bm
JayTurnr (2021-03-20 13:24:50+00:00): Analyse and update bus stops using NAPTAN data **
BCNorwich (2021-03-20 14:49:34+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I see you've, probably inadvertently, joined this new footpath to the river. There should be a ford here or the highway should be section up to tag a bridge over the water.

I also see your path crosses over three sections of private service highway without joining. Probable also a mistake.

Could you look to remedy these anomalies, please? If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
Geoff M29 (2021-03-20 15:18:02+00:00): Hi Bernard
Thanks for the welcome and the heads-up on the errors.  Corrected now I think.
angys (2021-03-20 12:17:16+00:00): Thank you
rene78 (2021-03-20 12:22:18+00:00): 👍 welcome!
user_2066394 (2021-03-20 20:19:00+00:00): Das Restaurant wurde geschlossen?
Wanja42 (2021-03-21 13:38:03+00:00): Das Restaurant meines Wissens nicht, aber von einem Biergarten weiß ich nichts. Deshalb habe ich ihn mal rausgenommen.