piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Weide (2020-12-26 04:40:55+00:00): Bitte dran denken: Wenn an platforms kein "bus=yes" steht, dann ist das kein Versehen sondern korrektes Mappen. In PTv2 ist "xxx=yes" nur für stop_positions vorgesehen.
blackboxlogic (2020-12-28 02:27:37+00:00): You're tagging these roads as access=private which means "you're not legally allowed to be here". That's useful if there is a gate, fence, or a sign that says "you're not legally allowed to be here". I frequently see people misusing the tag for property which is privately owned, but in Maine you CAN legally go on privately owned property unless specifically told otherwise (by a gate or sign). I haven't personally been to these locations so I don't know the situation, but if there isn't a sign or a gate, it would be more appropriate to use the tag "ownership=private" to indicate that they are privately owned, and leave the access tag empty. If you feel the need to place an access tag on privately owned properties which don't have gates or signs, they would be access=permissive.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96434399
blackboxlogic (2020-12-28 02:29:44+00:00): I forgot to say: thank you for your contributions and hope you don't mind some gentle guidance.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96434399
chipstrat (2020-12-28 14:34:42+00:00): OK, thanks for the help.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96434399
Nakaner-repair (2021-01-03 17:37:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 96857575 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 96434565. Der Steinbruch war schon als Steinbruch (Fläche) erfasst. Steinbruch ist kein Eigenname, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
!bm (2020-12-25 21:38:05+00:00): +source=survey
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96434735
JochenOSM (2020-12-26 16:39:16+00:00): Hallo V-Li,
seit wann tragen wir denn Dinge ein, die "in Kürze in der Nähe" eröffnet werden? Den von dir gewählten "Namen" finde ich nicht so gut, opening_hours= kann ich nicht nachvollziehen (so lese ich "für jedermann zugänglich 8-16 Uhr"), und healthcare=centre auch nicht (für mich wäre das healthcare=vaccination weil das der einzige Zweck des Nodes ist).

Gruß,
Jochen
V-Li (2020-12-26 17:12:01+00:00): Hallo Jochen,

ich orientiere mich hier an den folgenden Stellen:
https://www.main-echo.de/regional/kreis-miltenberg/so-funktioniert-das-miltenberger-impfzentrum-art-7194894 (Öffnungszeiten, die gelten ja unabhängig von der Zugangsmöglichkeit)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Schwerpunkt_der_Woche

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/vaccination

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Impfzentren_in_Deutschland

Das Impfzentrum wird in Containern und einem Raum der Kliniks eingerichtet (laut Main Echo, ich war noch nicht vor Ort), die Öffnungszeiten sind ebenfalls in der Zeitung kommuniziert.  Das Tagging bezieht sich auf die Beispiel im Wiki.  Du darfst mich gerne hier korrigieren, wenn ich komplett falsch liegen sollte.

Grüße
V-Li
MxxCon (2020-12-26 01:43:33+00:00): Your edit looks good👍
luiswoo (2020-12-26 19:28:45+00:00): Закладки отмечаем?
DressyPear4 (2020-12-26 17:37:52+00:00): Olá, nomes não devem ser adicionados em caixa alta, considere apenas a primeira letra de cada palavra em maiúsculo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96435528
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2020-12-27 22:58:01+00:00): Hallo AndusLongus,
schön, dass du so fleißig bist! :-) Ich habe aber eine Frage zu den Öffnungszeiten von Uno Pizza die du geändert hast. Bist du sicher das die aktuell sind, denn auf der Webseite steht täglich von 11 bis 23 Uhr.
AndusLongus (2021-01-24 17:24:50+00:00): Schild nochmal vor Ort geprüft:
So-Do: 11.00-23.00
Fr-So: 11.00-24.00
Da gibt es wohl einen Widerspruch zum Web...
AndusLongus (2021-01-24 17:32:35+00:00): Meinte natürlich Fr-Sa: 11.00-24.00
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2021-01-24 17:49:37+00:00): Okay, im Zweifel greifen die Öffnungszeiten vor Ort würde ich sagen. Deshalb habe ich die Zeiten so angepasst wie du sie oben angegeben hast. Danke :-)
SHARCRASH (2020-12-26 15:17:19+00:00): new elements, tags added, positions enhanced
SHARCRASH (2020-12-26 15:18:31+00:00): was not meant for this changeset...
ElliottPlack (2021-02-05 05:09:11+00:00): Awesome! I saw the trailhead of this from the WB&A but never got to ride it. I did add all this protected land to the map around here to help people find where they can explore without trespassing.
release_candidate (2021-02-14 04:25:26+00:00): Duplicates existing POIs
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96435871
nlme (2020-12-26 00:36:20+00:00): Hi, this is the second time in 3 days that you've made "standard changes" that across over an area of eight countries.

Please do not do this as it's almost impossible to easily review what you're editing on the map, and unnecessarily makes the changes appear on everyone's history. Keep your changes to just a small area.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-12-29 23:35:03+00:00): Boa noite, você removeu o nome da cidade aqui, você colocou fonte do forum no lugar do ponto que representava o nome da cidade e assim o mapa ficou totalmente errado, estou revertendo esta edição e por favor mais cuidado nas edições.
MicDK (2020-12-30 08:28:00+00:00): Rundkørslerne er dele af vejene Vestergade og Mølmarksvej. Se Svendborg Kommunes kort: https://drift.kortinfo.net/Map.aspx?Site=Svendborg&Page=Kortopslag&sso=0

Vælg Administrative Data > Adresser > vejmidte_navn

Dine rettelser er derfor tilbageført.
osmviborg (2020-12-30 10:52:30+00:00): Det du ser på driftsiden er data direkte fra 'Danmarks adresser'. OSM følger ikke slavisk dette register, i så fald skulle f.eks. alle til og afkørsler på bla. motorveje navngives, det gør vi jo heller ikke.
MicDK (2020-12-30 14:01:09+00:00): Jeg lytter, og jeg har kigget lidt på de diskussioner, der har været om navngivning i rundkørsler i både Danmark og udenlands. 
Min umiddelbare tanke var, at vejnavnene skulle være der, når kommunerne i Danmark bruger at navngive veje i rundkørsler. Samt at der kunne komme "huller" navigationsapper, hvis der manglede et vejnavn.
Jeg har nu testet i Osmand, og her skriver appen blot "Rundkørsel" uanset om der er navn på vejen eller ej. Vejhavnet ses på kortet, men det bruges altså ikke til noget.
Når den gængse konvention derfor er, at ikke navngive veje i rundkørsler, så er jeg med på at undlade det.
Er vi enige? Så sletter jeg alle navne i rundkørsler i mit nabolag.
osmviborg (2020-12-30 15:11:07+00:00): Tak.
MicDK (2020-12-30 15:48:01+00:00): Er nu rettet til nul navne :-)
MicDK (2020-12-30 08:26:58+00:00): Rundkørslen er en del af vejen Wiggers Park. Se Svendborg Kommunes kort: https://drift.kortinfo.net/Map.aspx?Site=Svendborg&Page=Kortopslag&sso=0

Vælg Administrative Data > Adresser > vejmidte_navn

Din rettelse er derfor tilbageført.
!bm (2020-12-26 12:45:29+00:00): Hallo l3nnox,

statt Löschen eines leerstehenden Geschäftslokals u.a. POI ist es in den allermeisten Fällen besser, disused:* zu setzen, s. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused: (beachte generell  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix )

Der Grund ist ganz einfach, dass die Chronik erhalten werden soll:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

entsprechend geändert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96450065

--besteGrüße!bm
l3nnox (2020-12-27 17:21:03+00:00): Hallo !bm,

danke für den Hinweis und die ausführliche Erklärung. Beim nächsten mal wenn ich was neues mache, werfe ich vorher nochmal ein Blick ins Wiki.

Grüße l3nnox
Richard (2022-03-09 09:31:30+00:00): Hello - in this changeset, you seem to have dropped a vast amount of nodes with ele, time and hdop tags but nothing useful in them. Could you remove them please? Thank you!
barte (2022-03-09 14:20:14+00:00): Thanks for catching.  I'm not sure what happened, as I only surveyed the upper campground--but I think I deleted them all.  Please let me know if there's something I missed.
Lukas615 (2021-01-18 11:03:38+00:00): Hallo,
beim "name:" Tag wird eigentlich nicht sowas wie "Gleis 3" etc. eingetragen, sondern auf Streckengleisen der Streckenname. Siehe hierzu im Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Gleis
Außerdem sollte meiner Meinung nach der Betreiber entweder als "DB Netz" oder "DB Netz AG" eingetragen werden siehe hierzu am besten in Taginfo.
Gruß Lukas
user_5359 (2020-12-26 04:49:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice the difference between description and name. You didn't need a tag name=playground if you has the tag leisure=playground (for example).
user_5359 (2020-12-26 04:31:25+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte füge keine privaten Informationen von Mietern oder Eigentümer zu einem Wohngebäude hinzu.
SomeoneElse (2020-12-26 09:53:42+00:00): Grr -not survey yet! From OS OpenData StreetView for now, to be filled in from footpaths later.
!bm (2020-12-25 23:45:40+00:00): source!=survey
source=Geoportal Berlin / ALKIS Berlin - Gebäude; Geoportal Berlin / Berlin Zoom; Geoportal Berlin / Adressen Berlin
sorry!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96437234
Ze0zohk1 (2021-07-08 16:07:54+00:00): 👍👍👍
b-jazz (2021-03-13 17:30:19+00:00): Hey there jmb70. Thanks for your improvements. I wanted to point out a small error that you can hopefully avoid in the future. When you were drawing cul-de-sacs, you were drawing the way as A-B-C-D-C, where you would double back to a previous point to end the way. (At least I think this might be you. Apologies if I'm not reading the history right.) When you end a way, you can just click the end node twice instead. If you don't you create this odd topology error where a road doubles back on itself. Thanks.

Oh, and I'm cleaning this up where I find them, so no need for you to find and correct these. I'm just hoping you can avoid this in the future.
SomeoneElse (2020-12-26 09:53:33+00:00): Water north of the Seph, rom OS OpenData StreetView for now, to be filled in from footpaths later.
trigpoint (2020-12-27 11:52:29+00:00): Hi Ivan
Cyclists do not have a statutory right of way on canal towpaths in England and Wales. The towpaths you changed were correctly tagged as bicycle=permissive and this tag needs to be fixed.

Cheers Phil
n43fsa (2020-12-27 12:36:36+00:00): Thanks, I'll revert these changes, but I note a concern that, while you're technically correct, towpaths are *in general* permissive paths (i.e. for walking, too). Singling out bicycle for this tag could be seen as a statement that "cycles don't really belong on the towpath", which is not the stance of the owner (Canal and River Trust) who declare towpaths a shared space for both cyclists and walkers. 

From the Canal and River Trust website:

"Is the towpath a public right of way?

Most towpaths are not public rights of way. Instead, the majority of our towpaths are ‘permissive paths’ as we allow members of the public to use them. Occasionally we need to close towpaths to carry out maintenance work."
trigpoint (2020-12-27 13:38:57+00:00): Thank you, that is very true.

Much of the towpath in Cheshire is legally public footpath but the Shropshire section should be foot=permissive as you say.

Cheers Phil
SomeoneElse (2020-12-26 02:39:37+00:00): Water north of the Seph, from survey
SomeoneElse (2020-12-26 02:59:25+00:00): Grr -not survey yet!  From OS OpenData StreetView for now, to be filled in from footpaths later.
iWowik (2021-01-25 10:03:05+00:00): Не надо копировать в OSM чужие ошибки.
Фамилия написана не верно.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888524111
Пусть эти ошибки украшают карты Яндекс, в OSM им не место.
Sowa1980 (2021-01-25 20:12:15+00:00): Володя перестань, мы не копировали ни чего, все наши данные собраны с обходов на местности с полевых работ , 
И не надо нам приписывать тех действий которых мы не совершали,  За такое и в суд подать можно. за обвинение.
Ещё раз тебе пишу ФИАС не эталон!
iWowik (2021-01-26 16:13:02+00:00): Ты вообще в состоянии отнестись критически к своей работе?
Я пишу про ошибку.
Там буква не правильная в фамилии. 
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B5%D0%BB_%D0%9A%D0%BE%D1%80%D1%87%D0%B0%D0%B3%D0%B8%D0%BD_(%D0%BF%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%B0%D0%B6)

Причем на соседних кусках я смотрю, что она поправлена Михаилом
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888524112/history
Sowa1980 (2021-01-26 16:52:40+00:00): уже отвечал те 
Ты почему то только нам замечание делаешь , акцентируешь на наших ошибках внимание, давай заострим проблему твоего вандализма, Знаешь попробуй в минус 40 что то внести на смартфоне или не ошибится в полевых , когда одна вывеска такая другая такая, потом это еще надо все сверить дома с правовыми документами, проверить как до тебя это внесено. Еще и с твоим вандализмом разобраться. с твоей корявой автоматизацией.
Легко тыкать людей носом которые это делали, прикрывая свои действия чем угодно.
iWowik (2021-01-26 19:40:38+00:00): Хорошо, поправлюсь:
не надо в OSM вносить ошибок.

Я бы не тыкал, если бы на любое исправление не встречал бы от тебя обвинений в вандализме.
Поэтому я теперь для начала и предлагаю исправлять ошибки самому автору.
Sowa1980 (2021-01-26 21:53:45+00:00): Володя если ты исправляешь, то Вопросов к тебе нет и у меня нет цели просто придираться к тебе, Но если ты черное от белого не хочешь отличать.
Пример и начинаешь на кофейной гущи гадать. 
Взять пример который ты мне в ген плане пишешь я тебе про эту сиагеевскую и им подобную улицу писал не раз если тебе на Ген плане обозначили часть участка , то есть подписали названия, а часть нет,  то это не означает что остальная часть улицы не имеет названия, И пояснял тебе не раз смотри Правовые документы , если нет не делай механических правок и не затирай данные чужие не обдуманно. Там есть табличке на каждом доме нет тебе еще как ты говоришь на улицах нужно на каждой указатель лично для тебя поставить что бы ты поверил, а каждый сантиметр дороги не подписать? А то не поверишь же и этому.
iWowik (2021-02-10 19:45:58+00:00): Вот Михаил молодец, без превентивной мантры про вандализм, механические правки исправляет ошибки.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888524112/history
Ну почему же тебе это так тяжело дается?
iWowik (2021-02-10 19:48:36+00:00): Ну а улица Карчагина пусть останется навсегда в Яндекс картах.
https://yandex.ru/maps/11271/tulun/geo/ulitsa_karchagina/1530948615/?ll=100.567059%2C54.593842&z=16.32
Sowa1980 (2021-02-12 21:52:45+00:00): яндекс тут причем поясни? Или тебе так хочется показать что данные взятые от куда , увы тебе 1001 раз писали и фото присылали и так далее наши все данные взяты в ходе полевых работ. Не надо по себе людей сюдить мы не прем как ты из Кадастра и ФИАСА, увы разачарую тебя, не суди людей по себе.
Sowa1980 (2021-02-12 22:13:55+00:00): УК РФ Статья 128.1. Клевета
iWowik (2021-02-17 09:18:50+00:00): Так у них Карчагин на карте.
Я понимаю, что повсеместно выросли люди, не знающие ни как пишется фамилия, ни самого литературного героя Павла Корчагина.

Поэтому и написал, что пусть в Яндексе ошибка останется, а в OSM теперь все поправлено.
iWowik (2021-02-17 09:28:36+00:00): Клевета, это про факты.
"Не надо копировать" - это просьба, призыв.
"Фамилия написана не верно." - это факт.
Там стояла буква А вместо буквы О.
Sowa1980 (2021-03-07 18:37:37+00:00): Про факты аналогично не копируй с ФМАСА , а описка или ошибки у каждого бывают и не надо подгонять желаемое под действительное, мог бы глянуть выше эту улицу написана верно.
По себе людей на надо судить Володя, тем более я тебе даже ген план высылал.
iWowik (2021-03-17 09:06:40+00:00): Да я вот и вижу, что в отличие от меня, у тебе сложно обстоит с признанием своих ошибок.
Для выявления которых нужен не ФИАС, а достаточно знания литературы и орфографии.
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2020-12-28 14:13:42+00:00): 您好，我是OSM中国志愿者暨OSMF会员，快乐的老鼠宝宝。请您不要向OSM添加无意义编辑，这会影响使用者对正确信息的获取。本编辑涉及的区域已在（https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96540819）中修复。若有异议请您邮件（LaoShu_CN@outlook.com）联系我。感谢您对OSM的贡献。
ovruni (2020-12-26 03:28:49+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han eliminado los nodos de la posta y de un centro inicial para agregar en su lugar vías, sin embargo estas vías contienen menos etiquetas que los nodos eliminados. El nodo 5577067228 [0] fue ingresado como parte de la importación de instituciones educativas en coordinación del ministerio de educación. [1] El nodo 7113103585 [2] fue ingresado como parte de la importación de centros de salud por parte del equipo de Mapbox [3]. Por favor evitar que se pierdan estas etiquetas.

Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe

Saludos

[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5577067228
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Importando_instituciones_educativas_en_Per%C3%BA
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5577067228
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Health_centers_import_in_Peru
Jarek 🚲 (2021-02-03 15:06:25+00:00): Per https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86090482 the pedestrian connection from Bathurst has been removed, but it was readded in this changeset. Which is correct?
Shrinks99 (2021-02-04 00:46:40+00:00): Good catch, have emailed the Fort York contact email, will sort it out and post details here!
Jarek 🚲 (2021-03-08 17:32:39+00:00): Hey Shrinks99, did you end up hearing back about this footbridge? I would be tempted to remove it based on the newer imageries (e.g. Mapbox which shows Bathurst bridge under construction so it's from 2020 and has the footbridge gone)
Shrinks99 (2021-03-10 01:12:16+00:00): I didn't!  They haven't responded to my email.

I'm inclined to take your word for this, lets remove.
Jarek 🚲 (2021-03-10 02:17:47+00:00): Sounds good, cheers!
Hb- (2022-12-24 23:06:51+00:00): Mit dieser Bearbeitung wurde dem PLZ-Bereich 38707 Altenau die vermutlich falsche Ortsbezeichnung 38707 Clausthal-Zellerfeld zugefügt.
Dawid2849 (2020-12-26 16:36:39+00:00): Dzięki za poprawę relacji 213 Błota -> Gocław.
Dawid2849 (2020-12-26 16:39:27+00:00): i innych które zepsułem.
user_5239402 (2020-12-27 01:55:49+00:00): STOP Road deleted.
user_5359 (2020-12-26 07:36:59+00:00): Hello! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
TrueWeast (2021-04-23 18:44:21+00:00): Hey angys,

I noticed here that you reclassified this primary to tertiary (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/750641368), and I am curious what you might know about the highways in this area. It seems as if the current primary is built to handle more traffic, but based on aerial imagery at this eastern intersection (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=20/2.3105665561010587/102.4274341022943), it appears westbound traffic must use this tertiary. Also, the `ref=M2` follows the primary east and west until it meets this tertiary. Do you know why the `ref=M2` tag exists along the tertiary and not on the primary highway immediately north of it? Is it possible both highways are part of the M2, and both highways should be considered primary?

Looking forward to hearing from you,

TrueWeast
angys (2021-04-24 04:29:11+00:00): I think the current primary road is the new build bypass road to shortern the distance.. The old road is for residential access. For M2 I am not sure. Should refer to the local road code later.
angys (2021-04-24 04:31:24+00:00): Okay, after some investigation, your speculation is valid,  you may make change.
TrueWeast (2021-04-27 16:27:12+00:00): Thank you for your response, I have made the edits. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103719428
Supaplex (2021-04-17 07:03:30+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
rene78 (2020-12-26 19:59:41+00:00): Hallo SchmidtFriedrichshafen,

bei Geschäften, die ihren Betrieb eingestellt haben, bietet sich "disused:amenity" an.

Ciao
René
skquinn (2020-12-26 19:00:42+00:00): Hi,

Please note that the value for maxspeed=* is in km/hr unless otherwise specified. Most values in the US should take the form maxspeed=XX mph.
user_5359 (2020-12-26 20:09:20+00:00): Thanks for the tip! Necessary changes have been made.
Heinz_V (2020-12-29 09:15:17+00:00): I suppose that „cmi3j89d9o“ is your second mapping account.
If that is true, we have the following situation:
- I wrote you (26.12.2020) a private message :I informed you about the errors and gave hints how to correct the errors.
- you did not answer but continue mapping in Taiwan
- since now you refuse to discuss the problems seriously

If you continue like that without reaction, then I will delete your mappings with MAPWITHAI in India which are full of errors.
manojkmohan (2022-02-07 20:12:42+00:00): This track is not good for Sasthamcotta lake. Its a Boundary way
Ali00098 (2020-12-26 20:12:33+00:00): Remove and correct erroneous edits in the map
SekeRob (2020-12-26 09:29:07+00:00): Why start a discussion and agree and finish? The 2 rail bridge pieces are bound together by a bridge area just added. Leads road in cutting Where there is a bridge the is no tunnel tag, the wiki is clear on that and seen hundreds like that. "But both options should not be used at the same time (a bridge tag for the upper way and a tunnel for the lower way for the same crossing).Rail IS on bridge!
Fra00 (2020-12-26 09:43:52+00:00): I didn't use both tags, and there is no bridge area. Rail is not on bridge; it is the street that goes underground (a fact), hence it is a tunnel (logical consequence). I don't think I have to cite OSM guidelines again.
SekeRob (2020-12-26 10:18:52+00:00): Beyond a doubt it's a short bridge, the width of the road, the breadth of 2 rails wide, 7x8 at best. Bridge areas are drawn to, as said, bind multiple parts on a bridge together, road north, road south, sidewalks, cycle tracks, guard rail, railing, and what not. To quote "and if the lower way is short and the upper way is supported on concrete, brick on metal pillars / beams then that is almost certainly a bridge." It looks like a bridge, it smells like a bridges the composition is a bridge, and 'Underground' is when you look up and cant see the sky because there's a layer of soil/rock in between ;o)
Fra00 (2020-12-26 10:32:24+00:00): Since we are talking in English, which is not my mother language, I can't express myself as well as you do. So, please, try not to use that to prove me wrong.
The railway is not supported on pillars and beams, but it is just a polygonal tunnel (different from classical circular ones). There are the walls and the roof of the tunnel, all of which are in concrete.
The street, I repeat, goes under ground level (and that's a fact), passes under the railway, and then reemerges on the other side of the railway. That's what I call a tunnel.
berndw (2020-12-26 13:47:36+00:00): Danke, da habe ich wohl etwas übersehen ;-)