piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2022-03-01 18:48:19+00:00): Hier bevindt zich niet Parkweg 16  dus ook niet De Quack. 
Zoe svp de juiste locatie op en tag daar op bij. 
Je hebt twee adressen samengevoegd. 
Ik zal wat herstellen
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-28 12:35:45+00:00): Je verandert doorlopend adresnodes. 
Wanneer iets niet klopt kun je dit beter doorgeven aan het Kadaster.\
Eggie
eggie (2022-02-28 12:46:23+00:00): adresnode hersteld..
Bestaat het kappersbedrijf hier nog Zelfde adres?
Tilia_J (2022-03-01 11:56:49+00:00): Volgens het KvK zitten beide er nog, zelfde eigenaar. Heb je hier op locatie gekeken?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-02-28 12:41:55+00:00): Beste Hugo  Probeer bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnodes.
mvg
eggie
eggie (2022-02-28 13:01:43+00:00): De dierenspeciaalzaak heeft hetzelfde adres als de lunchroom. Bestaat de dierenzaak nog wel?

MVG
eggie
iboalali (2025-12-04 12:44:36+00:00): Silvias Kiosk has been closed for around two years
HirschKauz (2025-12-04 21:13:03+00:00): ok - danke 
hab den Kiosk entfernt - oder ist nun etwas anderes dort? 
Grüße
iboalali (2025-12-04 21:36:09+00:00): Ist noch nicht unbenutzt
iboalali (2025-12-04 21:36:27+00:00): Ist noch unbenutzt*
trigpoint (2022-02-28 17:40:45+00:00): The tag service=alley is a very odd way to describe way 120282236 which is correctly described as highway=unclassified is it not?
s4br1 (2022-02-28 18:24:41+00:00): There's a sign saying "unsuitable for motor vehicles" so I was indicating that it should not be used to route between the B5063 and the lane going onto Salters Mill. Perhaps "motor_vehicles=discouraged" would be better? Open to suggestions.
trigpoint (2022-02-28 18:56:04+00:00): motor_vehicle=discouraged would be a better tag although it is one of those places where you wonder why the sign is there. A hgv would.struggle, but its fine in a car.
Cheers Phil
s4br1 (2022-03-01 09:13:01+00:00): I double-checked the OSM wiki and it says that "service=alley" is used for "a narrow service road usually located between properties to provide access things such as back gardens, rear entrances, fire exits, and storage areas". That sounds about right - it's narrow and provides access to gardens and carpark. Possibly "service=driveway" would work as an alternative, but there should be something there to discourage it from general routing.
trigpoint (2022-03-01 09:34:18+00:00): Simply tagging it as motor_vehicle=discouraged is adequate, it is afterall a public highway and no narrower than many other roads in the area. It is afterall the responsibility of a driver to not blindly follow their satnav. 

This road is absolutely fine for cars, and 
is one where I wonder about the real reason for the signs.

We should not map for the renderer, or in this case router. They should be able to consume this tag, it is wrong to choose tags based on what routers support.

Cheers Phil
Richard (2022-03-01 09:53:31+00:00): motor_vehicle=discouraged is a much better tag from a bike routing point of view!
s4br1 (2022-03-01 10:02:24+00:00): That makes a lot of sense, Richard.

Phil - I appreciate that the road appears fine, but surely we shouldn't be second-guessing what the signs are for either?

I'll change it to "motor_vehicle=discouraged" as it's an accurate reflection of signage and probbably the most helpful way to tag it for different use cases.
trigpoint (2022-03-01 11:24:02+00:00): Thank you.

However I am not basing my views on imagery and that it appears ok. They are based on real world experience and local knowledge which is the gold standard in osm. This section of road is fun :)

Cheers Phil
PelleV (2022-03-27 04:03:47+00:00): please undo this whole changeset, it is utterly outdated by half a year and destroyed weeks of my work and local surveys. check mapillary.
Abdelrahman_mahmoud (2022-03-27 09:57:04+00:00): Hello PelleV ;
Thank you for bringing me attention to this issue, I am sorry for this mistake and I reverted the street as it was.
Regards
Abdelrahman Mahmoud
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
HighRouleur (2022-04-02 12:32:15+00:00): I visited the area today and could not find any signage to indicate that ways west of Point cook road along the Skeleton Creek Trail are shared paths that permit bicycles. 
The Hobson Bay council cycling route maps verifies the above. Suggest that ways are updated accordingly.
aharvey (2022-04-30 03:43:25+00:00): It looks like you've added a driveway for the full admin boundary here at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3157838#map=19/-38.01944/145.39789 did you mean to just map the driveway next to it?
RicoElectrico (2022-03-01 15:08:24+00:00): Cześć, przejdź proszę samouczek w edytorze - tam będzie pokazane jak poprawnie dodawać budynki, ważne jest, by użyć dostępnego narzędzia (klawisz Q) by miały one kąty proste. Potem możesz spróbować poprawić budynki, które dodałeś. Dzięki!
DressyPear4 (2022-02-28 16:43:29+00:00): Olá, não faça edições fictíceas
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117943164
user_5359 (2022-03-05 18:59:56+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/956581454. What ist the meaning of the tag 8 = 6?
PT-53 (2022-03-01 07:19:12+00:00): Hallo Alex-r95,
ist dieser Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035984285/history
wirklich befahrbar und im Osten mit diesem Straßenabschnitt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/939185160/history
verbunden ?
Auf den Bing-Luftbildern aus 2019 sieht es so aus, daß der 1. Straßenabschnitt nicht mehr mit dem 2. Straßenabschnitt verbunden ist.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-03-13 11:59:24+00:00): Hallo Alex-r95,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2022-03-14 07:52:08+00:00): Hallo Alex-r95, 
Danke für die Bereinigung.
Grüße
Dodko (2022-02-28 18:44:52+00:00): Ak ste dali značku, že ulica je neprístupná
access=no
prečo ste dali  tieto značky?
bicycle=yes
foot=yes
horse=yes
motor_vehicle=yes
A naozaj je v celej dĺžke Šípková? Lebo tú adresu majú len domy na konci ulice.
BCNorwich (2022-03-01 09:03:44+00:00): Hi, You've drawn the road over buildings and another highway, it's doubtful if this is a boardwalk. Thus I've removed SV ROAD.

Regards Bernard.
bxl-forever (2022-02-28 13:58:02+00:00): Hello,
When you give this kind of name: "JES - De Distillerie" validators will mistake it for a multilingual name, and expect to find name:fr="JES" and name:nl="De Distillerie".
Probably not what you wanted, right?
I suggest using ndashes to deal with this sort of names.  I remember you did it correctly for some campuses.
JhowieNitnek (2022-02-28 14:14:47+00:00): Thanks I forgot I will fix it
Pieter Vander Vennet (2022-07-13 16:43:40+00:00): Hi, 

You added a climbing feature here. Would you mind giving more information about it?
JhowieNitnek (2022-07-13 17:06:53+00:00): There is a climbing structure in the walls here
Thierry1030 (2022-07-24 02:02:44+00:00): Hello,
You added tourism=hostel.
As far as I quickly checked on the website, there's no hostel here. Can you clarify?
Thank you in advance.
Thierry
JhowieNitnek (2022-08-05 11:12:16+00:00): JES is a hostel
M!dgard (2025-07-26 01:32:27+00:00): > You added a climbing feature here.

From the website it looks like sport=climbing_adventure rather than sport=climbing. I changed it.

This is important in order to have a correct map of real climbing gyms :)
felipeeugenio (2022-02-28 15:52:26+00:00): Hola.
el nombre del puente se expresa con el tag bridge:name=
no confundir con el nombre del camino.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117944377
yadathot (2022-02-28 13:21:30+00:00): Added delivery access restriction on gate as per Driver feedback.
MxxCon (2022-03-01 08:05:10+00:00): Hello.
Based on the available satellite imagery it doesn't appear like there's a crosswalk or intersection here. IF there's actually an intersection or a crosswalk, it must be mapped as such, and not just as footpath.
Can you please elaborate on this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117945162
user_5359 (2022-03-01 16:54:28+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1035995926. What is the meaning of the tag ぬまたはし = GSImaps/ort ? Did you mean source=GSImaps/ort ?
user_8655426 (2022-03-02 13:53:06+00:00): Hello!
Your guess is right. I fixed it. (ぬまたはし -> source)
Thank you for pointing out.

There is a legend that a monster once lived around this bridge.
I may have avoided his curse thanks to you.
eggie (2022-02-28 13:50:45+00:00): Beste Hugo...
Beschrijf svp wat je hebt toegevoegd. 
Voeg niet nogmaals adressen toe, maar gebruik de reeds aanwezige adresnodes.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-02-28 13:52:37+00:00): Japans Restaurant EDO heeft hetzelfde adres als de Bazar. Klopt dit wel?
MxxCon (2022-03-01 08:06:36+00:00): Hello.
Based on satellite imagery it appears that there's a sidewalk along most of this road segment. Shouldn't that feature be mapped rather than saying that people are allowed to walk on the road?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117945388
eggie (2022-02-28 14:15:58+00:00): Je kunt als commentaar geven bij je upload. Horeca toegevoegd oid.
MVG
eggie
user_5359 (2022-03-01 16:25:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9545083791. What is the meaning of the tag LGBTQIAP+ = LGBTQIAP+?
Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:lgbtq
MxxCon (2022-03-01 08:09:26+00:00): Hello.
Similar to your other edit, it looks like this road segment has sidewalks along most of its length. Yet walking on the road is allowed?🤨
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117945594
thumnus (2022-03-01 16:29:36+00:00): Hey MxxCon, thanks for your comments. My fixes were short term, to try and rectify a couple of journey planning issues, but in the medium-long term I'd be happy to provide sidewalks. Thanks
MxxCon (2022-03-01 16:38:56+00:00): Please note that it is wrong to "fudge" the map so that you get the desired routing results. It's called "tagging for renderer", but also refers to tagging for router. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer for more details.
You either need to properly add all the appropriate data on the map or update your routing software so that it handles this situation better, because you can't apply such temporary fixes all over the world.
MxxCon (2022-03-01 16:39:40+00:00): Also, are you mapping for some organization?
user_5359 (2022-03-01 10:01:40+00:00): Hallo Stefan, ich habe mir erlaut den Schlüssel "Bemerkung:" zu "note" zu korrigieren. Aber bitte denke daran, dass wir nicht von anderen Karten abzeichnen.
atpl_pilot (2022-03-03 09:02:34+00:00): Ich vergleich mehrere Layer miteinander, und dann stellt man fest, dass unterschiedlich SAT-Bilder unterschiedliche Aktualisierungen haben. Derzeit scheint BING hier der aktuellste SAT-Layer zu sein.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brandenburg/Geoportal#Importe

Zitat: "Die Nutzung zur Verifizierung und zur Zusammenführung von Beobachtungen aus unterschiedlichen Datenquellen ist selbstverständlich sinnvoll."
user_5359 (2022-03-03 09:18:14+00:00): Hallo, die Satelliten-Bilder von JOSM sind selbst verständlich in Ordnung. Die Formulierung hat nur meine Warnglocken aktiviert (und immer besser einmal zu viel nachzufragen, als nachher wesentlich größere Probleme zu haben). Danke für die Erklärung!
atpl_pilot (2022-03-03 11:37:53+00:00): Gerne doch.
Pa413 (2022-05-09 09:06:19+00:00): Bonjour Robert04500, 

pourquoi vous avez fusionné le point "Roumoules - Cinéma de Pays" avec la "Salle polyvalente" maintenant ça correspond plus à rien. Veuillez s'il vous plait à ne pas fusionner le point car ce sont 2 choses différentes. Merci. Bonne contribution. 

Cordialement.
Robert04500 (2022-05-09 12:24:21+00:00): Bonjour,
J’ai fusionné  la salle polyvalente et le cinéma de pays parce que le cinéma se fait dans la salle polyvalente. 
Merci pour votre remarque. 
Mais il y a d’autres endroits où les modifications ne paraissent pas : par exemple, la fontaine de la République et adossée à un lavoir. Pour le faire paraître j’ai dû fusionner fontaine et lavoir !
Bien cordialement 
Robert Ambrosi
Pa413 (2022-05-09 12:47:14+00:00): Bonjour,
Je comprends mieux mais la fusion que vous aviez fait à supprimé le cinéma.
Après y'a certains éléments qui n'ont pas de visuel même seul il me semble.
Cordialement
Pa413
gpstracks (2022-03-01 19:54:57+00:00): Buongiorno.
Chiedo gentilmente la fonte di questa modifica.
Grazie.
NNNNNNic (2022-03-02 07:33:34+00:00): Cartografia Tabacco n. 065
wielandb (2022-02-28 14:19:18+00:00): Heyho,
vom Luftbild her sieht es kontraintuitiv aus, aber hier geht es tatsächlich nicht durch. :o
Hab unter  https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3068357 mal Fotos der Situation gemacht. 

VG
Rhoon (2022-02-28 14:25:26+00:00): meh :/ :D
ich ändere es zurück
sorcrosc (2022-02-28 21:58:51+00:00): Non mi sembra molto sensata così la relazione. I multipoligoni non sono contenitori dove mettere tutti gli elementi interni ma servono a creare aree. In pratica adesso la relazione dice che c'è un'area esterna dove è campo sportivo, poi un anello dove non lo è più e poi la "bowl" dove torna ad essere campo sportivo.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8440117

Ciao
realjep (2022-03-03 17:54:18+00:00): Hai perfettamente ragione!
L'esigenza qui è di definire tutta l'area esterna come skatepark "Adriatic Bowl" e poi avere una sua parte interna (la bowl vera e propria) disegnata nel dettaglio come si vede ora. Come posso fare si che l'anello sia parte del tutto? Grazie
sorcrosc (2022-03-06 14:30:49+00:00): Scusa il ritardo.

L’abbinamento solo con leisure=pitch non offre tante possibilità per la mappatura dettagliata.
La mia intenzione era di fare qualcosa di simile agli stadi, dove c’è un perimetro esterno etichettato come stadio (leisure=stadium) e poi il campo di gioco all’interno etichettato leisure=pitch e le piste etichettate leisure=track. Esempio: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/43.72995/12.62735 

Nel caso di questo skatepark avevo messo leisure=skatepark sul perimetro (questo tag è menzionato qui anche se non molto diffuso: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dskateboard ) e poi la bowl etichettata leisure=track o pitch.

Il bordo interno della vasca direi di non considerarlo. Si potrebbe eventualmente etichettare come cordolo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb

Ciao
realjep (2022-03-07 14:22:29+00:00): Si l'esempio stadio calza perfettamente. 
Il tag skatepark non è davvero usato (https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=skatepark) anche se avrebbe perfettamente senso per identificare singole aree (bowl, halfpipes, banks etc.) all'interno di uno skatepark. Ci ragiono su un po' appena ho tempo anche perchè ne ho mappati a decine e mi sono posto il problema.

Riguardo al bordo interno della vasca in realtà (dal punto di vista di uno skateboarder e dell'informazione che vorrei a livello di mappa) è quello più importante; anche mettendo il cappello di un utente non-skaterboarder: sapendo che li c'è un buco verticale di oltre 3 mt. può essere una informazione utile, specie nei parks pubblici aperti a tutti). Faccio qualche ragionamento grazie per i chiarimenti.
Piz Pachific (2022-03-01 21:01:17+00:00): Why are you changing addresses from buildings to separate nodes? Normally it will happens the other way, because of more advantages to have the addresses on the building.
BBMaper (2022-03-02 07:10:55+00:00): Hi, 
Some building have more numbers an it is a good solution to place the number near the entrance with this number. Very often you can see buidings with entrance on 2 streets, so with different numbers and street name (look in the center of Grange for example).
datendelphin (2022-03-02 08:20:52+00:00): I agree, it's better to have one node for each address if there are several in one outline. But you could put the address nodes on the outline. That makes it easyer for data consumers (one less jump to make)
praeteritum (2022-07-03 23:41:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123167324.
cyril42e (2022-06-01 11:31:10+00:00): Bonjour Rommar, j'ai une question sur l'usage de motor_vehicle=designated sur barrier=bollard, je n'ai pas trouvé de référence sur le wiki ou les discussions, est-ce que le but est de permettre aux voitures de passer ? Est-ce que c'est ce que l'on veut sachant que seules des personnes du "service" peuvent passer ? OSRM route maintenant à travers celui au nord, mais pas celui au sud, sans doute à cause du type "rising", que je vais corriger, mais je me demande s'il faut vraiment laisser motor_vehicle=designated ... ? Merci.
Rommar (2022-06-01 14:21:48+00:00): Bonjour. J'avoue ne plus retrouver la source qui m'avait fait mettre motor_vehicule=designated. Après re-lecture de la doc cela ne semble en effet pas approprié. La borne ne semble pas empêcher le routing telle qu'elle est taguée. J'ai fait des corrections de topologie et de tag des routes à l'entrée sud du parking de la Ramée. Il faut attendre la mise à jour de la base de routing et voir le résultat. Il faudra trouver la bonne combinaison de tagging pour empêcher l'accès aux véhicules sur la partie réservée aux véhicules de service. A siuvre...
cyril42e (2022-06-01 22:24:46+00:00): Ok merci, j'ai cru à un moment que mettre bollard=rising suffisait, mais j'en suis moins sûr car une autre particularité de l'entrée nord qui laissait passer les véhicles est qu'elle est la seule à n'avoir aucun tronçon avec motor_vehicle=no... (l'entrée sud-ouest a un court tronçon, et l'entrée sud-est a toute la route taggée ainsi). Attendons de voir la mise à jour oui.
mueschel (2022-03-10 12:24:58+00:00): Hi,
'name:zh_yue' is not used in other places. The common tag is 'name:yue'. Could you check and fix this?
borovac (2022-03-10 12:54:09+00:00): Hi,
I am checked this name and I am fixed like you said. Thank you for letting me know.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
ivanbranco (2022-02-28 21:20:12+00:00): Hi NYbuildings,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9545192998/history

this node has an invalid place=* value, could you check it out please?
SekeRob (2022-02-28 14:46:16+00:00): NB: Many inside areas in this forest have not been tagged at all as 'inner' thusly rendering with trees on grass, meadow, bare rock, scree etc.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Małgorzata W (2022-03-04 21:11:06+00:00): Czy jest jakaś podstawa do wykonania przez Ciebie kolejnej błędnej edycji tego obszaru? Boiska należą do powiatu, teren na którym znajduje się szkoła jest terenem otwartym, jako "school" może być ewentualnie oznaczony budynek szkoły i bezpośrednio przyległy do niego teren. Pozostały obszar to nie jest "school".  Proszę nie wprowadzać niepoprawnych informacji. Sugeruję również usunąć "Liceum Ogólnokształcące"., które wprowadziłeś do Zespołu Szkół, bo  takiej szkoły tu nie ma. Radzę też zastanowić się nad umieszczeniem (w innym zbiorze zmian) przedszkola na posterunku policji. Tego typu edycje naprawdę nie dodają wiarygodności zmianom dokonywanym przez Ciebie.
dahelfichmalmit (2022-03-03 14:34:01+00:00): Dort ist die Vereinigte Lohnsteuerhilfe e.V. Lohnsteuerhilfeverein. Die Öffnungzeiten stehen nicht dran nur Tel. Nummer.
legofahrrad (2022-03-03 14:59:32+00:00): Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung! Ich habe das nun entsprechend eingetragen und schließe somit auch den Hinweis https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2410064
praeteritum (2022-07-03 23:40:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123167302.
mavl (2022-03-03 02:40:57+00:00): Hello. This changeset adds the road there where road exists already. This changeset is reverted.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-02 19:59:10+00:00): Not sure what happened here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7241420
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117948310
Alexy_ (2022-02-28 15:35:40+00:00): Undone
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:02:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
4004 (2022-02-28 20:56:34+00:00): are you going to clear wikimapia too? that seems to have more targeting-ready data than OSM
Monstrofil (2022-03-01 07:46:12+00:00): @4004, I know about wikimapia and other sources, I also well understand that the "secret" information I deleted is still available for all who downloaded osm dumps. And I even understand that Russian government, as ex-ussr, has all data about military objects on Ukraininan  land.

The problem is that ssu (https://www.facebook.com/SecurSerUkraine/posts/307873778106206) currently posted OSM screenshot with "secret" data on it and we are afraid that openstreetmap will be blocked because of that.

When the war ends, we will get data back (probably with some filtering), but for now - this decision is best for saving OSM in Ukraine.
4004 (2022-03-01 08:43:17+00:00): as a heads up - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117966391
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-01 12:49:48+00:00): Revert discussion claims "Reverted change was discussed within community."

In such cases linking discussion in edit description is recommended and typical

(in case of reverting revert - definitely do this)
aceman444 (2022-03-30 15:11:07+00:00): What is sensitive in the names of some collapsed building parts in Chornobyl, that those names needed to be removed? Yes, those areas are strange to be tagged as anything military=*. Did you just remove names on anything with military tags ?
Monstrofil (2022-03-30 16:01:50+00:00): yes
aceman444 (2022-03-30 17:19:33+00:00): Then it is no wonder such blind automated changes don't have much support among other mappers.
pizben03 (2022-03-13 15:05:50+00:00): http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#117948700

Джерело для видалення?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:Key:source
praeteritum (2022-07-03 23:38:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123167253.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 23:10:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166950.
BCNorwich (2022-03-01 08:12:28+00:00): Hi, I've removed the duplicate section of Way: 195/4/10 (1036027892) and connected it to the A4260 rather than the boundary line that you joined it onto. I also amended the path descriptions and names, those numbers are the County Code not a name.

Regards Bernard.
praeteritum (2022-07-03 23:06:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123166893.
luin132 (2022-02-28 16:36:54+00:00): Source: Maxar Premium Imagery;Mapbox Satellite;Esri World Imagery (Clarity);Esri World Imagery;Bing Imagery. Mistakenly said source was a survey.