piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
impiaaa (2022-10-05 23:25:57+00:00): The "error" was probably iD wanting to confirm that the restaurant was part of the Chick-fil-A brand. It should have given you two options: one to say yes, and add extra "brand" tags, and one to ignore and add a "not:brand" tag indicating that it's not the same brand.
mariotomo (2022-10-05 22:53:33+00:00): hola. "local knowledge"? acabas de pasar por ahí? y luego por el Johnson & Johnson de San Salvador? y poco antes por el Johnson & Johnson de Santiago de Chile? cómo lo haces?
BigKev97 (2022-12-03 15:43:31+00:00): La fuente de la compañía.
mariotomo (2022-12-03 17:51:09+00:00): o sea que la fuente NO es "local knowledge" como lo especificaste.
eggie (2022-10-05 10:28:03+00:00): Dag WF  Je vraagrt feedback.. Wanneer je de aard van het bedrijf niet toevoegt zal het in OSM niets doen.
Dus kijk in de wiki welke tag hier bijhoort.

office=....  ?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:office

Ik zal in ieder geval even office=yes (algemeen) toevoegen

Groet
eggie
Glassman (2022-10-09 01:42:34+00:00): According to the county, the eastern half is 121st Place Northeast, but it turns into 146th Avenue Northeast. 

#TIP: OSM spells out street names - the reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127014874
emersonveenstra (2022-10-04 21:27:04+00:00): Hi,

The way you had the sidewalk (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100660586) before was actually correct, it's supposed to connect to the road, not the parking lot, so that it becomes part of the highway network
Rainero (2022-10-05 20:49:37+00:00): Hallo AP_MUC,

willkommen bei OSM!  
Dein Kommentar an diesem und anderen Änderungssätzen ist immer nur "fußwege". Guter Stil bei OSM ist, in diesem Kommentar zu erläutern, was man warum geändert hat. Damit können andere leichter verstehen, was deine Intention ist. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments  

Hier konkret sehe ich Gehsteige neben schon kartierten Gehsteigen neu eingezeichnet, z.B. entlang der Graubündener Straße. Da würde ich dich bitten, dich erstmal eingehend mit dem Getrennt-Mappen von Straße, Rad- und Fußwegen zu befassen. Das ermöglicht sicher genaueres Kartieren von Bordsteinen, Übergängen, Oberflächen usw., aber es erfordert auch besondere Sorgfalt, um Routing nicht kaputtzumachen und es müssen ggf. an der Straße, zu der der Gehsteig gehört, Attribute (Tags) gesetzt werden, die Anwendern der OSM-Daten mitteilen, dass der Gehsteig separat gemappt ist. 
Zu beachten ist auch, dass Straßen, bei denen keine bauliche Trennung zum Gehsteig vorliegt (der Randstein gilt nicht als bauliche Trennung), meist sidewalk=left|right|both und teils auch die zugehörigen surface-Tags haben, was dann auf die separten Wege übertragen werden muss. 

Außer dem Kommentar am Änderungssatz sollte auch immer die Quelle für die Änderungen angegeben werden. Wenn du mit dem iD-Editor arbeitest, gibt es direkt unter dem Feld "Änderungssatz-Kommentar" die Möglichkeit ein Feld hinzuzufügen, wobei "Quellen, Hashtags" schon als Auswahlmöglichkeiten sichtbar sind. Bei vor-Ort Erkundung wird gerne der englische Begriff Survey verwendet, aber man kann da natürlich auch "Radtour durch Fürstenried" oder passendes schreiben.

Viele Grüße,
Rainer
eggie (2022-10-05 06:44:32+00:00): Dag Eco   
water = lake zal niet correct zijn. 
Dit is geen meer in de zin van...  
(zoals IJsselmeer, Grevelingenmeer)
Wel zou je water=pond kunnen gebruiken. 
salt en tidel  =no lijkt me niet nodig om toe te voegen. De zee is hier ver weg. 
eggie
eggie (2022-10-05 14:19:47+00:00): Beste Eco  Ik heb het hier aangepast naar de tagging zoals gebruikelijk is in OSM.
incline=10%  Dat zal toch niet? 
Staat er een ruiterverbod vooraan? Vast niet. 
Het watervlak had ik al eerder verwijderd. 
Probeer je eerst in te lezen in OSM voordat je verder iets aanpast.
Duplicated ways verwijderd.

Tagging omgezet in Engels...   
Alle tagging is nu eenmaal afgesproken volgens de conventie van OSM. Je kunt niet zomaar zelf zaken verzinnen. Graag ook wat aandacht besteden hoe je iets intekent.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust. 

Fijne dag. .. 
eggie
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-04 22:09:31+00:00): Switched the building outline and the 4-level part on the lower part here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127018311
(made it so the building relation makes sense)
eggie (2022-10-05 06:41:39+00:00): Dag Eco.. 

Geef op priveterrein zo'n voetpad aan met highway=path  Er zal hier geen officieel voetpad zijn met een G7 bord.
Kijk eens goed naar de luchtfoto en probeer het eens precies in te tekenen.
Verder heb je het pad deels dubbel ingetekend. 
Nog een tip. Maak paden niet vast aan de landuse of het water.
Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-10-05 06:37:17+00:00): Beste Eco...   
In het begin wordt wel meegekeken door ervaren mappers. 
Tip... 
Heeft het pad werkelijk de naam Zitplek of leidt het naar een zitplek?

Een zitplek kun je aangeven op een andere manier. bv met leisure=picnic_table
Let verder op dat je paden niet vastmaakt aan de landuse.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-05 06:38:31+00:00): Het pad heb je dubbel ingetekend. Als ware je het potlood niet van het papier gehaald en weer dezelfdeweg teruggetekend.
danieldegroot2 (2022-10-04 22:19:56+00:00): Feel free to comment on my changeset why you think it should be changed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100680873
Under the roof, I see
- there's a wall in the middle,
- on the left is a footway partially blocked by a fence and possibly an entrance, but it is obscured
- on the right is a glass wall, which I think is a glass room with four walls and therefore not a roof but a regular building part.
I could still see it being a roofed area without four walls, but then I don't know why there's an entrance in the glass wall.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10075880537/history

A picture of both sides would help, of course.
b-unicycling (2022-10-07 17:56:52+00:00): I've taken mapillary, but I don't know how quickly it will be available these days.
MrMoehritz (2023-03-05 18:54:10+00:00): Hi Blauer Pfeil,

ist jetzt schon etwas her aber du hast review_requested=yes angegeben. Hier kannst du sehen, dass dein Tag-change am Eurocity rückgängig gemacht wurde: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/8392116 aber die anderen Edits sehen gut aus. viel Spaß beim mappen!
felipeeugenio (2022-10-04 22:29:52+00:00): Hola Esteban
Se llama Villorrio 2 la población? ese es su nombre?
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127016722
Esteban Quinchel (2022-10-05 11:31:38+00:00): Correcto estimado. Según los habitantes de este sector, ese sería el nombre lo cual para mí tiene lógica ya que a pocos metros se encuentra la población Villorrio 1.
felipeeugenio (2022-10-05 11:38:00+00:00): ok, gracias Esteban. Paso harto por ahí. Me voy a fijar.
Es que es como raro el nombre. Pero gracias
Hufkratzer (2022-10-04 23:28:32+00:00): Hi, you have tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100949264 as a riding center (tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding) but in the aerial view to me it looks more like a riding arena (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena). In the iD editor there are two different presets for them ("Horseback Riding Center" and "Horseback Riding Arena").
Gustavo22Soares (2022-10-05 00:04:13+00:00): Oi tudo bem??
vejo seu empenho em mapear mas assim vejo que tem alguns problemas sérios de qualidade
por isso se quiser podemos marcar um treinamento
blxght (2022-10-04 22:29:23+00:00): A castle on the side of a residential street in Amsterdam?
limes11 (2022-10-04 22:32:41+00:00): and a pharmacy in Istanbul + a fountain in Saudi Arabia. 

Please provide some insight on your sources. Otherwise, these changes will be reverted.
Nakaner-repair (2022-10-05 10:37:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127040535 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 127017390 (suspicious MAPS.ME edit)
Nakaner (2022-10-05 10:38:56+00:00): Hi,

I don't waste my time with asking MAPS.ME users if any of there edit is suspicious. They often fail to understand what they do (contributing to OSM) and there contributions are of lower quality than the average iD newbie. Therefore, I reverted the changeset completely.

Best regards

Michael
Eiim (2022-10-05 00:54:04+00:00): What's wrong with bridge=covered ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127017526
VLD171 (2022-10-05 15:36:57+00:00): The combination of the tags bridge=covered, man_made=bridge, and building=roof on the bridge polygon can affect GPS navagation. Since the linear bridge feature already had the bridge=covered tagging on it, that tag was removed from the bridge polygon.  Thank you for your question.
Jez Nicholson (2022-10-06 08:31:29+00:00): Well done. I was just going in to do this one. I believe there is still a school hours time restriction on entering Grantham from Ditchling. I will go and look at the sign.
◪ Jarv (2022-10-07 14:32:43+00:00): Yeah the motor vehicle ban is still time related. I just couldn't be bothered to search how to do conditional restrictions.
Also there was a right turn ban out of Grantham Road onto Ditchling road, but now its oneway with a cycle contraflow, but no markings on the cycle contraflow require cyclists to turn left so I believe that legally you have to turn left whilst using the contraflow, but due to lack of markings I removed the banned turn.
Though if there are now markings there or signage feel free to add the restriction again.
Glassman (2022-10-09 01:37:03+00:00): The county shows this as 155th Avenue Northeast. Can you review your edit and verify the street name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127018694
Glassman (2022-10-09 01:39:41+00:00): The county shows 123rd Place Northeast only going part way it then changes to 144th Avenue Northeast. Can you review you edit. BTW - check out https://snohomishcountywa.gov/5414/Interactive-Map-SCOPI for street names and other info.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127018812
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-11-16 11:22:38+00:00): note: you added some image tags linking to image from StreetComplete notes (for example in this changeset)

Sadly this images are not permanent and are scheduled to be deleted shortly after note is closed, and were never intended for long-term archiving.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/StreetComplete/FAQ#Are_the_pictures_taken_with_StreetComplete_permanent%3F for details.

You can use http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1nOD to find remaining links in image tag, including what you added to OSM objects.

If you want to do something with them some may be still retrievable.

All such links are scheduled for removal (broken ones were already removed)
Glassman (2022-10-09 01:44:44+00:00): Another edit with overlapping road features. Please review.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127018865
SHARCRASH (2022-10-09 11:12:09+00:00): Hi! Sorry to hear that you had problems because a contributor misinformed users. I warned the DWG moderators of that user (ex tomolobla now visible as user_3961358) but I've been the one who had been blocked even though i provided proofs. Go figure out why some people do not admit they are wrong... Anyway this is a great example and i would like to help.

I see you've corrected the position of the addresses but you've duplicated the same addresses on the path (not properly tagged as path, i corrected) and on nodes of the path. I don't think duplicating addresses is correct... there should be only one address on one element to identify its building either on the exact position of the entrance (suited for this case) or the building itself (not suited because there are several addresses for one building). I've erased those on the node apart the original on the entrances and left those on the paths.

Hope this suits you. I've warned the Lux community.
SHARCRASH (2022-10-09 11:15:54+00:00): FYI : the rendering of path will show up soon in OSM, leave it some time because it takes more time when a previous edit had been done recently in the location (yours).
Deoniss (2022-10-10 12:21:25+00:00): thank you very much.  Road and address rue Alf 11,13.  But I still see 9,11,13 rue Kahlenbeerch on this house they have not disappeared.  The rest is perfect.  Thanks.  I edited for the first time in osm
Stereo (2022-10-11 17:13:09+00:00): Hi Deoniss! Congratulations on your first edit. I have now removed 9,11,13 rue Kahlenbeerch. They appear in the official data, but you're saying they don't exist at all on the ground?
Deoniss (2022-10-12 12:16:55+00:00): Thank you so much for your kindness.  Yes, these addresses are not, I know for sure because I live here.  Maybe it was in the past, I don't know.  There was an old building here, it was demolished, but my house was built on its foundation.  This is what they told me - fonds du logement.  Thanks again, it means a lot to me
Glassman (2022-10-09 01:44:11+00:00): It appears you have overlapping road features on 146th Avenue Northeast. Can you review your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127018901
mariotomo (2022-10-05 22:45:24+00:00): hola. gracias por añadir información al mapa. sólo, por favor, en forma de ayuda a la revisión, describe qué haces, no reutilices una descripción que ya no aplica. gracias!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127019161
user4816003805 (2022-10-05 03:22:46+00:00): Hi pancakedrawer001,

Even though this isn't called York Street, there is in fact a driveway here. Rather than delete the way, which might be re-added later by another mapper, it would make more sense to keep the driveway but fix the tags.

I've undeleted the way in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127024816, but tagged it as a driveway and added a note that it's not York Street.
Let me know if there are any issues with this change.

Thanks!
pancakedrawer001 (2022-10-05 03:45:59+00:00): Oh, that works too. Thank you!
JJIglesias (2022-10-06 01:54:58+00:00): e) Ningún objeto lleva Nombre (name), a no ser que tenga nombre propio; así una casa NO tiene ningún nombre; como SI puede tener un edificio, la etiqueta (Tag) define la Identidad del objeto; el nombre solo se coloca a objetos que SI tienen un nombre propio real (Ejemplos: Edificio Los Tiempos, o Panadería Uvita, o Farmacia Bolivar, etc.). Ningún nombre se escribe en MAYUSCULAS, todo va capitalizado ósea solo lleva Mayúsculas la primera letra de cada palabra; tal como los ejemplos anteriores.
mariotomo (2022-10-14 22:39:18+00:00): curiosidad: así se llama la tienda? o sea que tiene letrero "Tienda de esquina"? es un poco raro, pero será?
JJIglesias (2022-10-06 01:54:14+00:00): e) Ningún objeto lleva Nombre (name), a no ser que tenga nombre propio; así una casa NO tiene ningún nombre; como SI puede tener un edificio, la etiqueta (Tag) define la Identidad del objeto; el nombre solo se coloca a objetos que SI tienen un nombre propio real (Ejemplos: Edificio Los Tiempos, o Panadería Uvita, o Farmacia Bolivar, etc.). Ningún nombre se escribe en MAYUSCULAS, todo va capitalizado ósea solo lleva Mayúsculas la primera letra de cada palabra; tal como los ejemplos anteriores.
gogorm (2023-01-12 21:56:44+00:00): Hi, your source of information for naming this road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/598950660 is copyrighted. It can't be used as a source for adding stuff in OSM.
Duracellpt (2022-11-22 15:31:27+00:00): Thank you for your edit!
BikePC (2022-11-17 11:50:51+00:00): Het westelijke pad door de Krabbeplas is fietspad. Bron: survey 2022-11-16.
Status afgesloten fietspad richting Blankenburgverbinding moet gecontroleerd worden. Er stonden geen borden meer.
LockOnGuy (2022-10-05 23:37:12+00:00): Why did you change the 'name' from Arabic to Kurdish for: way 46778021, way 46779263, way 46946019, way 813319325, way 940398717?
ralley (2022-10-05 05:10:32+00:00): Do you have a source for your change? The meta data show only "LINZ NZ Aerial Imagery" which does not show a name or lack therof where as the mapillary imagery referred in version 3 shows the name as "Snows Lane"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127023930
rj_buchanan (2022-10-05 05:34:57+00:00): The change is based on personal sight - it's simply a driveway without any road signage.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127023930
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:28:30+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127024065
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:28:44+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127024065
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-07 10:30:41+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3875532 ?
TheDutchMan13 (2023-09-12 18:02:19+00:00): its fixed.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
rhtb0 (2022-10-05 08:19:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:%EB%B3%B4%EC%95%88%EA%B5%AC%EC%97%AD
rhtb0 (2022-10-05 08:25:50+00:00): 사용자께서 "보안구역"으로 지정된 곳의 지도 데이터를 삭제했기 때문에 이곳으로 안내되었을 것입니다. 그러나 오픈스트리트맵은 일반적으로 지도를 생성함에 있어서 개별 국가의 국가안보와 관련된 요구를 존중하지 않습니다. 건물이 위성 사진에서 보인다면, 그 건물이 보안구역이든 아니든, 오픈스트리트맵의 지도에 포함될 수 있습니다. 지도의 내용을 "보안구역"이라는 이유만으로 삭제하는 것은 오픈스트리트맵을 훼손하는 행위로 받아들여질 수 있습니다.

이러한 행위를 자제해 주세요. 감사합니다.
rhtb0 (2022-10-05 08:27:47+00:00): https://tiles.osm.kr/#18/37.57500/126.97700 군사시설 없는 한국 오픈스트리트맵
rhtb0 (2022-10-05 08:57:38+00:00): 오픈스트리트맵 만 삭제해도 의미없습니다.
위키매피아도 그대로 나와있습니다.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
adreamy (2024-01-21 15:31:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:첫_걸음#한국의_보안_지역(군사_지역)의_매핑과_훼손행위
goldfndr (2022-10-05 14:40:21+00:00): Thank you!
adreamy (2024-01-21 15:31:35+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:첫_걸음#한국의_보안_지역(군사_지역)의_매핑과_훼손행위
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:00:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
adreamy (2024-01-21 15:31:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ko:첫_걸음#한국의_보안_지역(군사_지역)의_매핑과_훼손행위
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:09:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:10:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
SekeRob (2022-10-05 13:56:50+00:00): Hi,

I don't get it, all the sections of the stream had that 'Torente' typo, the result of selecting all and changing Fiume to Torrente (by moi) Someone fixed 1 part, you fixed a 2nd part, but then there's a 3rd, 4th and 5th.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14554048

Am I missing something ;P)

The relation is correct though \0/

Ciao
VLD526 (2022-10-07 13:55:20+00:00): Yes, you are right, I had a chance to correct one part, but the others that contain the same typo should also be modified.
Thank you.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-05 04:45:02+00:00): Added road name "Samugaa Magu" and speed limit 30 kph according to local user's request #mbx_editing
user_2066394 (2022-10-05 22:07:21+00:00): Die Geschäftsaufgabe kann man mit einem life cycle prefix erfassen (disused:*=*)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Wenn die ins Nebengebäude umgezogen sind, könnte man den POI aber auch einfach rüberschieben?