piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skyper (2023-01-25 23:35:52+00:00): Hi Óscar,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10064697583 is probably only a `man_made=tower` or even `man_made=mast`, see https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22677.
We are looking for a solution to the incorrect use of `man_made=communications_tower`. Do you have any hint for us?

Following objects might need a recheck, too:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8959853768
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2057461544
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7364353465
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9074222228
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9326659303
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9007424051
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8939164683
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9257671956
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2057461566
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8939164686
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8939164684
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8939164685
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8959853934
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8941914266
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8959853933
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9517153573
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2084006033
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9293858783
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8932687427
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8932687426
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8702251036
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9275816530
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9718361523
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8680259930
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8901480105
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2079111888

Regards,
skyper
UNGSC-cronoser (2023-01-31 14:32:52+00:00): Hello Skyper, you're right, I will change those nodes to man_made=mast. 
Regards, Oscar
maraf24 (2022-09-30 21:13:44+00:00): Mieszkasz w Szczecinie?
MxxCon (2022-10-01 00:22:14+00:00): Hello.
Please update your StreetComplete version. Your version is very old compared to the current one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126832502
Patalakki (2022-10-04 09:23:28+00:00): Moi! Hienoa, kun olet lisäillyt pihateitä Lempäälään. OSM:ssä on teille eri luokkia ja olet nyt merkinnyt kaikki pihatiet asuinteiksi tunnisteella highway=residential. Oikeampi ja tarkempi merkintä olisi service=driveway, sillä kyseessä olevat olevat väylät ovat yksityisiä pihateitä. Jos tiellä on asutusta ja sillä on nimi, on se lähes aina highway=residential (tai korkeampiluokkainen). Tontille johtavat nimeämättömät pihatiet taas ovat matalamman tason väyliä eli usein juurikin tuo service=driveway.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
eggie (2022-09-30 18:32:45+00:00): Hoi  Zo te zien zijn de busrouterelaties nog intact. Op zich wonderlijk, want splitsen met editor iD gaat vaak fout. Je kunt beter JOSM gebruiken.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-30 17:34:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 126833424 where the changeset comment is: Reverting https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126833000 , see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6409
deneb48 (2022-10-05 10:57:07+00:00): Merci ! Je me suis permis d'effectuer la même modification sur le segment sud de la Rue Madame Curie, qui est aussi en DSC.
Carto'Cité (2022-10-05 12:13:05+00:00): Bonjour deneb48,
Merci beaucoup pour ton retour et tes contributions 🙂
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
wermak (2022-10-03 05:16:05+00:00): Hallo Nisyz,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/56354837/history
Das ref=* bei Straßen ist nicht gleichzeitig deren name=. Der Name einer Straße ergibt sich aus einem Straßennamensschild an dieser Straße. Dort steht aber nicht K 42 oder B 256 usw. Siehe auch, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen. Zitat: Autobahn 5” / “A 5” : Lasse den name=-Tag weg, wenn dieselbe Information im ref=-Tag passender wäre, der für Kennungen/Nummern inkl. Straßennummern gedacht ist. Lasse den name=-Tag grundsätzlich weg, wenn ein Objekt keinen Namen hat. Ich möchte dich bitten, den ref=-Tag einer Straße nicht noch einmal mit dem name=-Tag zu wiederholen. Dies ist falsch. Außerdem müsstet du bei deinen bisherigen Änderungen das name=* wieder entfernen.

Schöne Grüße
Nisyz (2023-03-31 17:23:09+00:00): Hallo Wermak,

das tut mir leid. Ich habe nicht gewusst, dass es da Unterschiede gibt. Für mich war es so als wäre der Straßenname und die Straßenummer das gleiche. Ich werde es ändern.

Schöne Grüße
Super-Map (2022-11-10 05:16:19+00:00): Bonjour Guillaume91540, le nom doit être noté en minuscule, uniquement la première lettre en majuscule. Bonne journée.
Super-Map (2022-11-13 08:06:59+00:00): Bonjour Guillaume, je fait la correction, merci pour l'information. Bonne fin de week-end.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-30 17:34:58+00:00): See also https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6409 .
zorglubu (2022-10-03 08:20:48+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai ajouté l'étiquette layer=1 sur le pont, car cette étiquette doit toujours être présente sur les ponts.
Bien cordialement.
joraf1 (2022-10-03 14:02:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci pour la correction et l'information...
Cordialement
eggie (2022-09-30 18:56:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
aTarom (2022-10-01 08:10:49+00:00): Hola CHINORRI,
puedes dar un vistazo a estas vías sin etiquetar?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094898290/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1094898291/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095190544/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095190545/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095190749/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095194522/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095414407/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095416950/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095416951/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1095416952/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098811536/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098813525/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098931560/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1098931561/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099398418/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099401567/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099401733/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099402232/history

Saludos
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-30 17:34:02+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 126833000.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-30 17:36:13+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126833220 for the revert of the third relation.
user_5359 (2022-10-22 11:02:45+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/315991610. What is the meaning of the tag 2:00 = AM?
eggie (2022-09-30 22:05:39+00:00): Daar zat wel een fout in, maar een elementaire.
Het hoort gewoon één watervlak te zijn. 
Het is gewoon een kwestie van uitsnijden uit de landuse.
Dat kan met een tool.. cut out polygon.
Ik heb het water uitgesneden en de outer mp's van de landuse verwijderd. 
Gr eggie
BertMule (2022-10-01 15:36:19+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Mooie oplossing.

Maar ik snap niet waarom hetgeen wat ik had niet zou werken.

Dank voor je hulp.

Groet,
Robert
ovruni (2022-10-04 17:10:56+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios nuevamente se han eliminado direcciones sin motivo aparente, aparte del cruce de peatones. Tampoco nombres de negocios se pueden ver desde las imágenes aéreas, menos estando a miles de kilometros de Perú.  Por otra parte, en OSM no tenemos permiso para poder generar obra derivada de las imagenes de drone de IGN.
Saludos
SomeoneElse (2022-09-30 18:05:58+00:00): The buoy (which is what is mapped here in OSM) is not called "null island".
Tirkon (2022-09-30 18:20:32+00:00): According to Wikipedia in many languages at this point is "Null Island". If you search OSM for this name, you will not find it. Should we put a second node with this name in this place?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_Island
SomeoneElse (2022-09-30 18:49:20+00:00): Wikipedia has different rules for inclusion compared to OSM (it allows fictional things, for example, and OSM doesn't).  Wikipedia used to have two separate articles but they got merged (I would say in error; but I have no influence over wikipedia)

Whether there should be a "place=locality" here called "Null Island" is an interesting question; I've argued against that in the past (and probably still would, on the grounds that it's a name used in geographical circles but not in the wider population).  However, people have suggested that it is widely known enough to be worth including as a locality in OSM (including at least one member of the board!) so my view isn't universal.  Some of the previous changesets at https://osm.mapki.com/history/node/3815077900 have comments on them, and there was quite a long thread at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2022-January/thread.html#87164 as well.
Tirkon (2022-09-30 20:05:49+00:00): I didn't think I was stirring up a can of worms here. I do not insist on keeping the "Null Island".
Tirkon (2022-10-02 16:55:50+00:00): As I said before, for the sake of peace I will not insist on mapping the name "Null Island". But I will give the following to consider:

According to our wiki, a "place=locality" is "a named place that has no population". We use names in OSM to be able to locate places. These can be political boundaries, for example. These names originally came about because someone made them up and then they went viral. We map them on OSM as "place= locality" if there is nothing physical in that, i.e. names of cadastral sections. "Null Island" is nothing else. It is a made up name for a place that has gone viral, especially around geography. So why should this be the only point where things are not done as they are in all similar places.

Besides, this is a very special place for geography and for OSM. If we look at the URL of an OSM map or at a single node in the database, we find a coordinate there that would not exist without the point for which the name "Null Island" has become common. Why do we want to disallow just one point, which is so important for OSM and has the same properties as many other "place=locality" in OSM? Thousands of other places with the same properties you accept in OSM, but just not this one??
poi-vediamo (2022-11-18 13:19:24+00:00): 0/0 indicates invalid/missing coordinates in many GIS systems, so it's best to avoid this lat/lon pair.
poi-vediamo (2022-11-18 13:25:07+00:00): I moved Soul Buoy slightly, CS 3815077900
SomeoneElse (2022-11-18 13:28:15+00:00): Thanks
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-30 03:29:32+00:00): What source did you use?  I don't see any listed.  I doubt that there is a major gas pipeline going under a bunch of houses.  For example:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099411682

Specifically in this area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/29.95129/-97.89280

Other than aerial imagery and a ground survey (unlikely), how do you know that there is a pipeline exactly there?

Thanks.
zluuzki (2022-11-30 18:17:37+00:00): Important thing first: This is not a "major gas pipeline", it is a abandoned (permanently out of service, in-place abandonment) oil pipeline. (and the size (12") is actually quite small)

The source is data from the Texas Railroad Commision (responsible for Texas Oil & Gas regulation). Their data is quite reliable. There are some lines which are obviously wrong/very rough geometries. 
But I review every way before I add it - including the way you linked.

I considered it to be reliable because:
- The northwestern parts of the way align perfectly with some cutlines through the scrubs (which are overgrowing, but also visible on old 1970s aerial imagery, so a random coincidence is very unlikely)
- The abandoned line is in the National pipeline mapping system (https://pvnpms.phmsa.dot.gov/) (which is extremely reliable) at the exact same route as the Texas RRC data/the mapped route here.
If abandoned pipelines are removed from the ground, they are also removed from their data - but they are still in there, so I assume they are also still buried.

Apparently, the pipeline never got removed (very common practice) -neither by the pipeline company nor the property developer- and the houses got built over the pipe.
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-30 18:26:24+00:00): Thanks for the thorough explanation.  It isn't a huge pipe, I agree.  Was just curious where you got the info and what source since there wasn't any provided.

Very likely the pipes were left untouched underground unless they were building basements, which I don't think those houses have, but I digress.  Removing underground pipelines would be prohibitively expensive.

Thanks for clarifying the source.  Keep up the good work.
ququruzka (2022-10-02 15:45:39+00:00): вітаємо ! 

вулиці в Україні мають бути названі виключно українською мовою. 
наступні ваші зміни будуть відкочені автоматично і помічені як "вандалізм".
Дякую за увагу.
eggie (2022-09-30 18:57:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MxxCon (2022-10-01 02:14:17+00:00): Hello.
Please note that it's inappropriate to tag the whole building as a business if that business occupies only part of that building.
A 3-story apartment building should not be tagged as a liquor store which is only on the first floor.
A 3-story office building must not be tagged as a cafe.
For these situations each business must be mapped as a separate node within the perimeter of the building they occupy.
A building can be tagged as a business only if that business occupies the whole building. For a example a stand-alone fast-food restaurant or something like Costco.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126835810
somix (2022-09-30 18:49:49+00:00): maxar*
Frans S (2022-10-10 14:59:26+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126836900
eggie (2022-09-30 21:47:05+00:00): Dag Bert.. Ik heb de mp van dat bos en het gras gehaald. Die is niet nodig.
Het water heb ik uitgesneden uit de landuse. Dat water is één geheel. Je kunt niet  de losse delen in een mp zetten.
Het eilandje staat wel als inner in de mp van het water.
Nu zal je geen drijvende bomen meer zien.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-30 21:51:23+00:00): Waar het pad door het water gaat heb ik bruggen toegevoegd.
eggie (2022-09-30 21:56:53+00:00): Je comment This keeps being mixed with forest, despite some eperiments. Relations seem correct.

Het water is niet omsloten door een type landuse maar door twee; bos en gras.
Dat water is nu gewoon uitgesneden en omdat het water in twee gebieden ligt is geen outer mp nodig. 
Gr eggie
BertMule (2022-10-01 15:38:51+00:00): Ik had opzettelijk 2 losse waterdelen binnen 2 losse gebieden gestopt.
Dat leek toen het handigst.
Zou moeten werken. 

Over die bruggen kreeg ik geen meldingen. Heb ik maar gelaten.
BertMule (2022-10-01 15:40:53+00:00): Misschien waren de bruggen het uiteindelijke probleem?
eggie (2022-10-01 20:07:22+00:00): Hoi.. nee de bruggen hebben er niet mee te maken.. 
Waarom het niet juist renderde zag ik ook niet direct.
Die mp s klopten wel..
Mp s maken met editor iD is ook niet ideaal. Met Josm gaat dat handiger en je krijgt ook gelijk feedback als iets niet klopt.
Mapse verder
Eggie
is-zUser (2026-07-29 21:07:27+00:00): Du hast einen Wanderweg gezeichnet. An dieser Stelle verläuft kein Weg, auch kein Wandereg! Bitte um Korrektur oder Löschung! You have drawn a hiking trail. There is no path or hiking trail at this location! Please correct or delete the line!
Glassman (2022-10-02 00:11:44+00:00): Could you verify the street address of this house. The adjacent street is tagged as 2nd Avenue Southwest and you used South 2nd Ave. BTW - we spell out street names in OSM -- the reason is software has a hard time unabbreviating.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126837543
Ryushinaka (2022-12-17 07:10:17+00:00): You are correct, I had them backwards/mixed up.  South 2nd Ave (S 2nd Ave) is the old name of the road before it was updated.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126837543
MxxCon (2022-10-01 02:18:27+00:00): Hello.
You tagged Sterling Place as having bike lane on the right side and not left. However, satellite and streetview imagery shows the opposite. Could you please elaborate on your edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126837851
akgerber (2022-10-02 00:00:55+00:00): Misunderstanding of the Streetcomplete interface, you are accurate that it is on the left.
ivanbranco (2022-10-01 07:56:54+00:00): Ciao PasqualeD,

come già segnalato precedentemente qua:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125725641
e qua:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126223614

non si deve aggiungere il tag building=* ai nodi degli indirizzi (così come tutti gli altri tag correlati come il numero di piani).

"If you still want to add addresses with the "House" button of Every Door app you'll have to indicate every time that this is an address and not a building. To do so, after entering the housenumber press "More" at the bottom of the form, then press "Building" > "...", then press "<empty>"."

Traduzione automatica di Deepl:
"Se si desidera aggiungere indirizzi con il pulsante "Casa" dell'applicazione Every Door, è necessario indicare ogni volta che si tratta di un indirizzo e non di un edificio. Per farlo, dopo aver inserito il numero civico, premete "Altro" in fondo al modulo, quindi premete "Edificio" > "...", quindi premete "<vuoto>"."

Stai avendo difficolta a seguire questa procedura?
PasqualeD (2022-10-01 08:53:16+00:00): Chiedo umilmente scusa, come sempre se trovi qualche errore puoi tranquillamente modificare e aggiustare in base alle tue competenze ed esperienze di mappatore, sto studiando giornalmente e sto cercando di migliorare sempre, se vuoi puoi correggere i miei errori
ivanbranco (2022-10-01 09:12:00+00:00): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mmi

^Al momento ci sono 318 edifici mappati come nodi. Si può anche sistemare pian piano ma sarebbe bene evitare di crearne di ulteriori d'ora in poi. Se non riesci ad evitare questo problema con EveryDoor potresti provare altri editor (OsmAnd, Vespucci ecc.) oppure aspettare che StreetComplete aggiunga questa feature a breve.
PasqualeD (2022-10-01 09:15:37+00:00): Si si ok
ma-rt-in (2022-10-01 09:10:32+00:00): Hallo,

Willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Es ist dein erster Änderungssatz und nicht immer klappt es so wie man es gerne möchte.
Deine Änderung hat den Fluss auf mehrer Kilometer untertunnelt. Ich denke das ist falsch.

Was genau hattest du den vor?

vg
Mashin (2022-10-01 22:25:14+00:00): All looks good.
Great job!
Marek-M (2022-10-01 08:17:12+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za aktualizację ale mam pewne pytania i sugestie :)
Najpierw pytanie - osiedle Wspólna i jego obszar (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099429573): skąd wziąłeś źródło danych, bo obszar, który narysowałeś wpada w pola uprawne i nie wygląda to na prawidłową obwiednię. Poza tym nie kojarzę, żeby ta część Banina kiedykolwiek miała taką nazwę.

A teraz sugestia - proszę Cię abyś nie łączył obszarów (m.in. landuse/neighbourhood/building/amenity) z drogami, ścieżkami i innymi obiektami. Połączenie ich wspólnymi węzłami powoduje duże trudności w późniejszych edycjach mapy.

Nawet udało Ci się zduplikować obwiednię tego osiedla Wspólna a jego węzły połączyć z gazociągiem. Już usunąłem to nieprawidłową obwiednię osiedla: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099429572/history

Pozdrawiam i życzę owocnego dalszego mapowania!
JRTuttle4 (2022-09-30 20:09:16+00:00): Added missing road names
user_3022894 (2023-05-07 16:16:34+00:00): Auch hier wieder, irgendwelche Änderungen...

Bitte nicht irgendwo Kitas einzeichnen, wo keine sind.

Betrifft https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099430190 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3452464
ivanbranco (2022-11-02 21:45:46+00:00): Ciao Zio Pino, 

questo changeset ha cancellato un sacco di tag, era voluto?
Zio Pino (2022-11-02 21:57:22+00:00): Non credo..
Mashin (2022-09-30 20:50:01+00:00): hi, thanks for working on OSM, but those are not railway crossings. Railway leads on a bridge over the road so those two never physically meet.
Annotate3767 (2022-09-30 23:14:47+00:00): Mea culpa; you're right!  Looking at the imagery, it looked like it did, but verifying against street-level imagery shows there's definitely a bridge there.
Mashin (2022-10-01 09:59:27+00:00): No problem. Things like this just happen.
Cheers
Mashin
Marek-M (2022-10-01 08:25:49+00:00): Część, dlaczego w tym budynku dodałeś tag 'height=0' ? 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464416786/history
Marek-M (2022-10-01 08:26:55+00:00): PS: Usunąłem ten tag, bo nie był poprawny.
Milaviy4 (2022-12-26 19:26:59+00:00): What will the future junction look like? At first glance the current configuration looks impossible
RobertH-PUM (2022-12-26 21:11:27+00:00): I will assume you are talking about A3-A8 junction. It's unknown how it will be. A3 towards Brasov was abandoned and isn't in any official plan up until 2030.
Milaviy4 (2022-12-27 20:00:22+00:00): You assumed correctly. Thank you for answering my question
user_2066394 (2022-10-03 18:12:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/407301527
Die Hausnummer
/Adresse wurde ursprünglich nach einem Besuch vor Ort erfasst.
Was ist mit der Adresse passiert?
sokol15 (2022-10-01 21:41:01+00:00): Ahoj, podle mě jsi špatně změnil*a kategorii silnice při zprovoznění. Construction bylo secondary, nyní má být highway=secondary. Silnice 1. třídy to jistě není.
JeroenHoek (2022-10-01 08:19:31+00:00): Zou je comments willen toevoegen aan je changesets? Dat maakt het voor je collegamappers een stuk eenvoudiger om changesets in de omgeving te begrijpen.
MxxCon (2022-10-01 02:46:10+00:00): Hello.
Unfortunately, there are many issues with your edit.
For one, many of the bike paths that you added are already mapped as tags on their relevant road ways. The way you mapped goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline.
Additionally, in your edit it seems like most of the ways you added are named like "Montgomery Street Protected Bike Lane", however as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions "name=" tag should be used as a description.
Also, most of the ways you added contain many needless nodes on seemingly straight lines. While that's not outright wrong, it creates unnecessary extra work when ways need to be adjusted to more accurate satellite imagery or road reconfiguration, plus extra data in the OSM database.
Please correct these issues, otherwise this edit will be fully reverted.

Also, please make your edits smaller. That makes it easier to review them, and if there are any problems, only smaller amount of data would have to be reverted of fixed.
MxxCon (2022-10-01 02:49:14+00:00): Also, it's cool that a city transportation planner is mapping for OSM👍🙂
eggie (2022-09-30 22:21:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community