piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-10-29 16:08:37+00:00): Zo te zien komt er voorlopig niets https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=mainelaan&resultOffset=0&objectId=0772100000341561&geometry.x=158309.33680359&geometry.y=388572.48418743&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0772010000721430
GerardH2 (2017-10-31 18:01:16+00:00): Ok.Zal ik onthouden. Bedankt voor de input.
ACS1986 (2017-10-29 17:52:48+00:00): Hi Tom, certainly agree that I wouldn't call the path alongside The Goit a cycleway. Paths with detailed mtb:scale tags still need the basic bicycle=yes access tag or map users and most routers will think cycling is not allowed. The only exceptions are cycleways and bridleways which are taken to imply bicycle access by default. 
Thanks for all you're doing to improve the map in the West Pennine Moors area. I'm sure I'll be less reliant on my OS map next time I'm over that way :)
Adam
TomJeffs (2017-10-29 22:31:30+00:00): Thanks, on Google Maps you could add an "avoid" field to indicate that a cycle path wasn't suitable, I'm still learning OSM so I just want to make sure that nobody on a road bike gets sent up a trail like this.  Of course a mountain bike is ok, but then again, legally I think cycling on this path is frowned upon as I saw a few "no cycling" signs on gates.  They weren't legal prohibitions though, just "you have no right to cycle here" warnings.
ACS1986 (2017-10-29 23:00:23+00:00): The access tags like bicycle= just indicate legal access, additional tags such as surface etc. indicate the characteristics of the path. A road cycling routing engine worth its salt should not route road bikes down unsurfaced tracks just because bicycles are allowed.  We can't be expected to leave bicycle tags off all off- road routes - to the detriment of all off road cyclists who want to use our data - just to cater for a proportion of road cyclists with poorly coded routing software.
Assuming we're talking about the same path, ie. the one alongside 'the Goit' from Anglezarke to Brindle, I'm confident it's part of a designated "West Pennine Bridleway" foot/cycle/horse route the council has developed. It seems the locals don't approve!
ACS1986 (2017-10-29 23:03:13+00:00): Sorry, I meant Anglezarke to Brinscall, not Brindle. 
Kind regards,
Adam
5m4u9 (2017-10-30 05:10:01+00:00): buena que hayas añadido el lugar, viendo los incendios esta bueno saber.

en lugar de bosque lo cambié a un aldea un poco más abajo, todo el lugar tiene potencial, en el mapa esta muy pobre le voy a poner esfuerzo.

volveré a visitar uno de estos días...
SHARCRASH (2018-07-16 13:03:32+00:00): noexit=yes tags need to be on the last node of the according way otherwise there will be no notification on routings if any third party service builds such feature and we don't know from which way it belongs if there are multiple ways going around.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-10-30 08:24:32+00:00): Proszę używaj opisów edycji które są bardziej precyzyjne - ten pasuje do dosłownie wszystkiego
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-10-30 06:50:52+00:00): Cześć! Zerknij tutaj, bo coś jest nie tak z Twoimi edycjami: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=670398#p670398
keujfl839237 (2018-06-29 18:07:14+00:00): Hello 
It seems you have confused the OpenStreetMap editing feature of Maps.me with its bookmarks feature. This is why I had to revert your edits to OpenStreetMap. For saving personal bookmarks in Maps.me, please push on the star button (see <https://support.maps.me/hc/en-us/articles/208624825-How-to-save-or-delete-bookmarks->).
Vulcanodong (2017-10-30 03:22:39+00:00): 机场东边这块应该是污水处理厂的湿地吧 不是公园
eggie (2017-10-29 17:07:20+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
eggie (2017-10-29 17:13:43+00:00): Scholen is een beetje schipperen. Je hebt het adres op het gebouw gezet, maar het staat ook al op de adresnode.
college heb ik veranderd in school.
Conform consensus OSM NED
VO - school
AOC en ROC -college
HBO en Universiteit=university
4004 (2017-10-29 19:32:09+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты,
а Бруснички разве по умолчанию не все на белмове подисаны?
santamariense (2017-10-29 21:26:32+00:00): Neste local vai ser construída uma praça/playground ou coisa assim, talvez com "atalho" na ligação Venâncio-Major. Em projeto na prefeitura já há algum tempo.
portalaventura (2017-11-09 01:19:37+00:00): Interessante, não sabia disso.
DaveF (2017-10-29 19:36:15+00:00): Hi Leo 
Welcome to OSM.
Did you know there's a tool in the editor to 'rectangularize' the buildings? 
Hover over the building, right click, select 'square'
Nakaner (2017-11-03 11:49:02+00:00): Hallo 30303020,

im Rahmen dieses Änderungssatzes hast du beim Bahnsteig der Station Ruhleben Tags ergänzt, die dort nicht hingehören. Der Bahnsteig ist schon als Multipolygon-Relation erfasst, d.h. die Tags, die die Fläche beschreiben, gehören an die Relation, nicht an den Way, der den äußeren Ring repräsentiert.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44504882

Könntest du das bitte wieder korrigieren?

Viele Grüße

Michael
30303020 (2017-11-03 23:05:21+00:00): Ok, da habe ich wohl etwas missverstanden. Es sollte jetzt allerdings in allen meinen CS entsprechend korrigiert sein, falls ich nichts übersehen habe.
SomeoneElse (2017-10-31 14:51:40+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Looking at some of the changes here such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536717413 I think you may be "overinterpreting" the imagery somewhat. 
If you look at the different imagery choices available you can get a feeling for the scale quite while, and its clear that none or almost none of the buildings that you've added here actually are buildings (that's clear with both Bing and your custom imagery - in fact your custom imagery, if later, suggests that buildings shown on Bing have been removed).
Assuming you're not in the West Bank at the moment, what I'd suggest is that you try mapping things more locally to you first - often it's useful to look at the imagery of a place you know well to see how certain features look from the air.  It can be difficult to tell roads from e.g. riverbeds if you're not careful.
If you're in the UK (guessing, based on your editor locale of en-GB above) then there are lots of local groups both HOT-based and non-HOT based where you can discuss mapping; there are also mailing lists and other forums - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact has lots of details.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2017-11-12 21:31:51+00:00): I'm guessing that the spelling of "Mandale Enginer House" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5198601990 is possibly a typo?
dudone (2017-11-13 16:51:56+00:00): Corrected to "Engine".  Thanks

Dudley
datendelphin (2017-10-30 19:07:33+00:00): schön, ich hab noch die zugehörige note geschlossen. Danke.
das-g (2017-10-30 23:01:47+00:00): Ah, danke, wusste gar nicht mehr dass ich dazu http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/234051 offen hatte.
Polarbear (2019-10-31 12:41:28+00:00): Bitte keine unzutreffenden Attribute um des Renderns willen vergeben. 
Ein Klettergerüst, Trampolin oder Karussell ist kein Gebäude, ein Balancierbalken keine Bollard-Absperrung und auch kein Treppengeländer. 
Repariert.
linerider (2019-10-31 22:29:28+00:00): Du hast vollkommen Recht. Ich war damals etwas enttäuscht, dass man von den vielen Details so wenig in der Karte gesehen hat. Mir ist es aber klar geworden und ich wollte es auch ändern, auch, da der Spielplatz noch umgestaltet wurde. Wie das dann so ist fehlte die Zeit. Hoffentlich finde ich sie mal, um alles zu korrigieren! Danke nochmal für deinen Hinweis!
freebeer (2019-11-07 16:51:22+00:00): i see a number of ways tagged as benches but also as building=yes that are rendered as irregular polygons - wouldn't there be a better way to mark these outlines, perhaps a wall or something, or would these be some sort of roof structure?
these are the first few entries below.
linerider (2019-12-12 13:56:31+00:00): Hi freebeer. These are small islands made of wood you can sit on. Two of them can be seen here: https://www.facebook.com/BeuthHochschule/photos/pcb.1613462682010087/1613462555343433/
I did not know how to map it correctly so it can be seen on the map. The shapes are quite accurate. I probably misinterpreted 'building' (Bauwerk) as 'structure'. Benches as polygons are not rendered :(
Polarbear (2019-12-12 14:14:42+00:00): Thus the thing the kids are sitting on would be a small playground=structure.
Please do not expect everything we map in OSM to be rendered in the general carto style. Se my first comment here.
freebeer (2019-12-19 13:19:58+00:00): it would be good to be able to map as a bench, something more than the roughly-two-metre linear feature implied by the point node, and which the higher-zoom osm-carto tiles reproduce as rough points, here not reflecting the actual orientation at all.

for example, i saw that a significant section of a wall near me had been given the bench treatment, not only as isolated individual benches, but a continuous 20-ish metre section of seating.  that is worthy of mapping as a linear way, although how to render it accurately is another matter.

another use case i've seen is a continuous way encircling a tree, or around a fountain or whatever.  this too could be represented accurately by a closed linear way; again at present osm-carto has no way to indicate seating is available along the entire mapped way, associating a line to an icon.

i don't know if anyone has reached the point of micro-mapping an individual bench as a closed polygon area some 40cm by 2m whose entire surface is the bench.  i'd hope not, or at least with area=yes, to differentiate from a ring where one can sit and rest, but not inside the border, there being a tree trunk, or fountain, or statue, or whatever.

an area significantly larger than a metre in front-to-back depth i would hesitate to call a simple bench, as with these dimensions it seems more suited to stretching out horizontally, unless built up akin to bleachers for sports audiences.

but i'm just stating the obvious, as it seems a renderer issue of how to display such a linear feature.  like polarbear said.
micheleOSM3 (2022-10-01 13:44:11+00:00): La way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/532565592#map=19/46.44955/13.25830 appartiene alla relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/140429#map=16/46.4534/13.2538
La relation ha il tag route=hiking mentre la way ha il tag climbing=route, questo mi fa sorgere il dubbio che ci sia un problema perché hinking e climbing non mi sembrano compatibili. In FVG questa è l'unica relazione con questo problema.
gpstracks (2022-10-01 14:00:33+00:00): Il problema è che la via normale allo Zuc ha l'ultimo tratto consistente in una paretina di 30 metri di 3+ UIAA. (oltre la classificazione sac_scale). Taggare climbing tutta la route non mi sembrava la migliore soluzione.
rik_ (2018-04-11 11:31:20+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe gesehen, dass du vor einer Weile im Bestenseer Weinberg ein natural=peak eingetragen hast.

Der Weinberg befindet sich komplett in Hanglage und enthält definitiv keinen Punkt, der die nähere Umgebung überragt, vgl. [1].

In der Nähe befindet sich der „Mühlenberg“, welcher tatsächlich den höchsten Punkt in der Umgebung darstellt. Ich denke, wenn, dann sollte dieser Punkt entsprechend mit Höhenangabe getaggt werden.

Viele Grüße

rik

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural%3Dpeak
tonyf1 (2017-11-03 22:15:40+00:00): All edits appear on the public map, deleted hostel named home.
rarad74 (2017-12-10 06:24:31+00:00): Salut. Nu se mai poate face stanga pe DN1 spre Bucuresti venind de pe centura dinspre nodul cu A3?
Popete Denis (2017-12-10 16:51:20+00:00): Nu.
Este conform cu realitatea. 
M-am lovit de acest impediment 
Poliția rutieră a considerat că în acest fel se decongestionează traficul. 
Pentru a intra în București trebuie să te deplasezi până la primul sens giratoriu.
surveyor54 (2017-10-29 22:19:50+00:00): Hi HoloDuke,

dir scheint noch nicht aufgefallen zu sein, dass die neuen Bing-Luftbilder teilweise einen Versatz von 5 - 10 m haben. Bevor man ein Objekt verschiebt, sollte man diesen Versatz ermitteln und auch berücksichtigen. Ich meine hier den Vogelbeobachtungsturm am Graf-Dietrichs-Weiher.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4317195578#map=19/50.38721/9.29119
Die Mapbox-Satellitenbilder habe so gut wie keinen Versatz.

Gruß
surveyor54
HoloDuke (2017-11-01 19:30:48+00:00): Die Koordinaten von der Vogelbeobachtungshütte habe ich direkt vom GPS. Habe mir extra einen Wpt gesetzt, da die Koordinaten der Hütte auf der Karte ziemlich weit von denen vor Ort gemessenen abgewichen sind. Kann allerdings sein, dass das GPS auch nicht gerade den besten Empfang hatte.
surveyor54 (2017-11-02 20:49:17+00:00): Sorry,
vielleicht war auch mein Satellitenempfang nicht so optimal.

Gruß
surveyor54
talk_cz_Deutsch (2017-11-08 10:10:13+00:00): Mechanische Änderungen von highway=bus_stop:
Bitte setz alle diese Änderungen zurück, sie sind eindeutig falsch durchgeführt. 

Mechanická editace highway=bus_stop
Prosíme vrátit všechny tyto změny, jsou provedené chybně.
fell3 (2017-11-08 11:13:55+00:00): Eindeutig falsch ist es nicht !!!
Habs zurückgeändert!
Ich habe es auch begriffen, dass ihr lieber mit den veralteten Einträgen lebt. Ich werde meine Zeit anders nutzen und lieber nichts mehr eintragen. Ich bitte aber darum auch in euren eigenen Reihen den permanenten Falscheintragern auf die Finger zu klopfen. 

Viele Grüße aus der Oberlausitz
Karsten Schiller
Constable (2017-12-04 15:41:43+00:00): Ciao, sei sicuro che questo sia davvero un parcheggio? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/536735407
Conosco bene la zona, li ci sono due file di alberi in un prato quasi sempre ben tagliato. D'estate nei periodi in cui tutti vanno al fiume può essere che qualcuno metta li l'auto ma non ho mai visto ne cartelli di parcheggio, ne una vera e propria corsia che ci passa in mezzo come hai disegnato tu. Il parcheggio ufficiale è quello appena sud/sud-ovest
Conosci la zona? ci sei stato quando hai fatto questa modifica?
Ciao, grazie
Harald Hartmann (2017-10-30 20:19:47+00:00): Hallo Shl-EF. Welche Liste hast du für 'Südthüringens schönsten Aussichten' genutzt? Bist du jede einzelne Bank abgefahren? Und irgendwie finde ich nicht, das es der "Name" ist, oder wurde das "eingraviert"? Viele Grüße aus dem Schleusegrund
woodpeck_repair (2017-12-04 09:01:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54322536 where the changeset comment is: revert all 'Zowie Polie' edits because of continued vandalism.
Nakaner (2017-11-16 11:54:35+00:00): Hallo Markus,

war es Absicht, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4292645 fast all ihrer Mitglieder zu berauben?

Viele Grüße

Michael
Markus K (2017-11-17 06:39:28+00:00): Hallo Michael,
nein die Routenrelationen fasse ich normalerweise nicht an, ich habe nicht bewusst etwas an der Relation gemacht. Ich schaue mir das mal an und korrigiere das.
Gruß
Markus
Markus K (2017-11-22 20:06:23+00:00): Hallo Michael,
danke für den Hinweis, ich habe wohl unabsichtlich wirklich die Relation zerstört. Ich habe das wieder korrigiert.
Gruß
Markus
Hjart (2017-10-29 21:31:50+00:00): Bemærk at jeg havde defineret Harre Vig: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7670346
maraf24 (2018-02-19 11:45:31+00:00): Jest tu trochę dziwnych edycji:
-sklejone adresy
-tagi sklepu przerzucone na budynek, ale nie wszystkie
-adresy przenoszone z budynku na obszar
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-31 13:45:44+00:00): Hello,
what are you trying to map?

This looks like nonsense
user_5359 (2017-10-30 13:30:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t use abbrevation on street names. I add also some other streets from the aerial images.
ma-rt-in (2017-10-29 21:39:45+00:00): Hallo,

du musst bei den zwei Parkplätzen nicht unbedingt das Wort Feuerwehr in Großbuchstaben schreiben ;)
Pikse (2017-11-10 11:58:39+00:00): Miks nii? Erinevalt varasematest ja teistest valdadest puudub praegu kaardil selle valla välispiir. Rolli "subarea" kasutamine pole vist üleüldse kuigi hea praktika, vt https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members
RM87 (2017-11-11 21:25:06+00:00): Meililistist läbikäinud mõtte peale tekkis lootus, et äkki saab asju teha inimlikult ja lihtsalt.  Küll aga paistab, et piiride kohapealt on tööriistad ja mõtted wikis pidama jäänud 8 aasta tagusesse aega kus niimõnigi riigipiir sisaldas veel auke. 

Paistab, et hetkel tuleb veel  jätkata vanaviisi. Teen mingil hetkel selle admin relatsiooni ümber.
literan (2017-10-31 10:09:45+00:00): не надо, пожалуйста, тащить описания в тег name. Не тратьте время - это все вычищено.
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:42:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
eggie (2017-10-30 07:36:27+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
literan (2017-10-30 12:15:19+00:00): Добрый день. Аккуратнее, пожалуйста: смотрите, куда вы утащили дворовый проезд в Бескудникове https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53353501
ealeks (2017-10-30 16:50:03+00:00): Спасибо, что поправили!
arvdk (2018-01-11 13:49:13+00:00): Please mind your description. You did not update a building nor edited access roads. You added a private car parking. Besides, I think you made a typo (See the second letter in the operator tag, it's capitalized.) http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53353556
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:43:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
arvdk (2018-01-11 13:46:11+00:00): Please mind your description. You did not update a building nor edited access roads. You added a docter and a pharmacy. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53353586
woodpeck_repair (2017-11-14 22:42:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53785191 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mechanical edits - mostly automated name:sr adding, is_in adding, and changes to wiki link - by user 'Serbian OSM Lint bot
arvdk (2018-01-11 13:43:03+00:00): Please mind your description. You mainly added grass and added oneway tag. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53353698
Peer van Daalen (2019-01-29 08:27:49+00:00): Na gerne doch! Ich hab ja sonst nichts zu tun, als die Fässer zu schließen, die andere vorm PC aufmachen um dann wieder auf lange Zeit in der Versenkung zu verschwinden ... :-) 
- 
Also! Es ist sowohl ! ein Parkplatz als auch ! ein Pausenhof. Die Zufahrt von der Bergischen Gasse ist frei für Feuerwehr (logisch) und für PKW mit Sondergenehmigung von denen es eine ganze Menge gibt, als da wären Lehrpersonal sowie PKW mit Behinderten-Sonderrechte. Die Sporthalle wird nämlich auch von verschiedenen Vereinen des Behinderten-Breitensports (Behinderten Sportgemeinschaft Aachen) genutzt. 
- 
Die Pöller sind in der Regel so drei/vier umgelegt. 
- 
Diese Parkflächen (etwa 25 bis 30) sind am Boden genau gekennzeichnet. Außerdem gehen diese Parkflächen rechts von der Sporthalle und hinter dem Hauptgebäude weiter. 
- 
Heute haben die sich hier ausgetobt: 
https://www.bsgaachen.de/allgemein/2019/01/rollstuhlbasketballer-machen-einen-grossen-schritt-in-richtung-klassenerhalt-in-der-oberliga-west/
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-31 13:49:31+00:00): Hi, you've made multiple additions that I'm not seeing on Aerial. Is this a mistake?
woodpeck (2017-10-29 22:53:05+00:00): unvollst. Changeset-Kommentar: zusätzlich auch 2 Briefkästen gelöscht, die zu einem neuen zusammengelegt wurden.
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-01 17:07:27+00:00): Hi mdavenport1985, it looks like you are adding random features to the map. You should only map buildings, roads, etc. Please don't add random points to the map. 
.
Thanks!
4004 (2017-10-30 22:06:07+00:00): если бы вы читали заметки, то увидели бы, что это уже было записано
Pavelfantik (2018-05-11 19:50:51+00:00): заметчи я читал, но и смысл в ненужном обозначении на карте того, чего давно нет. там действуют производства, склады.
4004 (2018-05-12 22:52:57+00:00): так там вроде был полигон, который не рендерится на обычной карте?
если нет, извините, моя ошибка
(хотя иногда историческая информация полезна)
literan (2017-10-30 12:02:52+00:00): вот это https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5198957110 какой-то фейк. На сайте у них ничего подобного http://mos-kino.ru/cinema.html - да и здание там явно не кинотеатровое
*Martin* (2021-03-30 08:20:28+00:00): cela tato hora je farma? na ortofoto to tak nevyzera.
georgo21 (2021-03-30 18:16:08+00:00): Ahoj,
je to obora - cela ohradena vysokym plotom a el. ohradnikom. Jelene, daniele, kozorozce.
*Martin* (2021-03-30 19:04:12+00:00): tak asi by som to oddelil od landcover, lebo teraz je to minimalne divne vyrenderovane.
maraf24 (2018-02-19 11:48:01+00:00): name=PSP im. Bajkopisarzy Świata
Co to jest "PSP"?
drobert (2018-02-19 11:53:11+00:00): Publiczna Szkoła Podstawowa
4004 (2017-10-30 22:11:39+00:00): вот тут как раз, до обрисовки пешеходной слева, имел смысл делать отдельно вело. радует, что вы начинаете вникать в вопрос
ScottNelson (2018-06-25 04:30:39+00:00): I'm curious why you tagged the trail from Sakinaw Lake to Agamemnon channel as access=no?  We used this trail to portage a canoe from Sakinaw Lake to the ocean last summer and there did not appear to be any restrictions.
keithonearth (2026-06-11 20:25:51+00:00): While this user does not seem to be active anymore, I think it's worth noting that the addresses they added contained many errors, including all the ones on this block, and I have not found any of their changesets to have any source specified.
radha_madanu (2019-04-16 04:17:24+00:00): "Hi  Dion Qairawan,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
"way 536766878
way 536766767
way 536766768
way 536766877" classified as 'Unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, entire area seems to be 'Residential'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance."
HubMiner (2017-11-02 19:16:25+00:00): Looks good, if possible add building entrance, hours, address, entrances. If bored: building levels, color, material.  ;)
HubMiner (2017-11-02 19:23:49+00:00): Looks pretty good; please add highway=give_way at the right points - see diagram:: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#How_to_map

Add lanes= if you can.  Check Esri layer - usually those images are clearer.
eggie (2017-10-30 07:39:48+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
HubMiner (2017-11-02 19:31:57+00:00): I usually do online search or ask in OSM forums for this kind of questions...  From what I found, "conditional restrictions" seems to be the right to do it: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Since this might affect real people, I would add date info in "description" and as "opening_hours" (even though it is considered obsolete for roads).

Let me know if you have any questions.
user_5359 (2017-10-30 13:20:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.

Please read also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals
HubMiner (2017-11-04 02:51:58+00:00): Driveway around Sonic looks off, please recheck.  If possible, draw driveway to Motorcycle Swimsuit, otherwise if anyone used it for navigation, it they may approach it from wrong street.
woodpeck_repair (2017-12-04 09:01:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54322536 where the changeset comment is: revert all 'Zowie Polie' edits because of continued vandalism.