piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Nikolai E (2022-02-11 01:45:55+00:00): 您好！
我注意到您在本次编辑中改变了丰台街道一部分居住区的性质。
经查证：
1、东大街5号院、东大街50号院、东大街66号院确实可确认为军事设施，我不持异议。
2、游泳场北路8、14号院的性质是怎么确认为军事设施的？我确实怀疑他们是总后干休所的一部分，但缺乏证据。
3、北京丰台工程机械修造厂确实曾经为解放军7212工厂，但现在其性质属军属民？是否存在证据证明其仍为解放军现役设施？

此致
Fnkok (2022-02-11 02:03:37+00:00): Nikolai E，您好：
游泳场北路8、14号院在别人所拍摄的小区大门，可以看到有强军相关标语，可确认为军属小区之类的居民区。
从网上资讯来看，北京丰台工程机械修造厂只有机动车检测场的部分有相关资料，其他地方均无资料，可判定为未开放民用。如果要标注，也只能把机动车检测场标志为非军事区。

此致
habi (2022-02-10 09:02:35+00:00): Und einen Ersatzneubau eingezeichet.
MaestroGlanz (2022-02-10 10:57:08+00:00): Wir hatten beim Wald nördlich von Hart und bei der Straße zum Reiterhof einen Konflikt. Ich habe das deinige übernommen und meines korrigiert.
opendcc (2022-02-10 18:10:36+00:00): In den Wald hatte ich nur einen doppelt übereinander liegenden Punkt gemerged.
user_5359 (2022-02-10 20:00:20+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bevor Du an den Daten änderst, weißt Du welchen Datenstand die Kollegen von ADAC Fahr+Spar (PKW) benutzen? Denn in Version 10 (vor 8 Monate) war es mit 30 falsch eingetragen. Version 11 (vor 22 Tagen) war es für den PKW richtig (aber die LKW Geschwindigkeit fehlt). Version 12 (wohl wenige Stunden später) wurde die korrekte Form eingetragen. In Version 13 wird der LKW auf 50 erhöht (sachlich falsch) und in Version 14 wurde versucht ein conditional Notation zu verwenden, die aber garnicht zieht, weil der Hinweis auf die Notationsform fehlt. Ich würde gerne auf die sachlich und fachlich saubere Schreibweise zurückdrehen, wenn Du keine Gegenargumente hast.
francians (2022-04-23 14:03:08+00:00): Ciao,
stesso commento che ho già fatto prima, questo credo sia il: "Monte Losetto"
Valuta tu se è giusto
Francesco
micheleOSM3 (2022-02-10 10:45:35+00:00): In Friuli tutti i sentieri hanno la lettera in minuscolo, solo la lettera F per le ferrate è in maiuscolo, vedi: https://www.cai-fvg.it/sentieri-cai-fvg/settore-7-prealpi-giulie/
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117235954
NastassiaKalesnikava (2022-02-14 15:31:59+00:00): Source - Mapillary and user feedback.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117236317
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-10 12:33:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (462)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
eggie (2022-02-10 10:11:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Alle begin is moeilijk.. Je weg eindigt op de landuse met noexit=yes.  Beter geen wegen verbinden met landuse.
Op de kuchtfoto zie ik het pad gewoon verder lopen als een highway=track
Ik heb de weg losgemaakt van de landuse

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-02-10 10:14:29+00:00): kuchtfoto??  > typo  luchtfoto  :)
user_5359 (2022-02-12 12:18:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/node/9494864549/history. I correct your typo of destination, but did you mean direction instead of destination? see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=n_north
Francoerbi41 (2022-02-12 13:50:46+00:00): No. I mean destination.
FE
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-09-19 14:05:58+00:00): Na podstawie czego mapowane było https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1029990434/history ?
charl3s (2023-09-19 16:56:40+00:00): https://mapwarper.net/layers/1508
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
bxl-forever (2022-02-11 10:05:22+00:00): Hello,

Do not forget to always add construction=* with the expected road type (in this case, "unclassified"), it makes it much easier to restore the situation when the works are complete.  (For instance with StreetComplete.)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=construction

For a short-term closure (only a couple of months), leaving highway=* unchanged and adding construction=minor may be better, especially if there are bus routes using a street, to avoid unnecessary warnings about bus routes becoming invalid.
Thierry1030 (2022-02-11 11:45:34+00:00): ok thx for your message. I will try to remember to add in the future the road type. And construction=minor I didn't know before. Do you have an idea if routeplanners take it into consideration?
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-10 12:33:01+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (462)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
eggie (2022-02-10 10:50:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback name=startpoint CHiLLrunning_nl  zal niets doen in OSM.
Maps what's on the ground is het motto. De vraag is of de locatie daar aan voldoet?


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
CHiLLrunning_nl (2022-02-10 15:41:22+00:00): Ik wil een startpoint voor Strava toevoegen
eggie (2022-02-10 15:44:15+00:00): Oke, maar toch niet in de data van OSM?
Eggie
CHiLLrunning_nl (2022-02-10 16:09:22+00:00): Strava directed me to Open Street map in order to add a startpoint for our runners. I might have got it wrong...
eggie (2022-02-10 16:14:06+00:00): Nice... :)
Unknown to me...  
I put a request at the Dutch Forum...
Please ask at the forum how to map.

Je kunt het op het forum vragen hoe te mappen.
Inlog identiek aan OSM account met wat wachttijd in het begin wegens accountcheck.
Ik zal de vraag even voorleggen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=854902#p854902

Gr eggie
CHiLLrunning_nl (2022-02-10 16:43:06+00:00): Thank hou! Excuse me for late reactions, this is new for me.😊
multimodaal (2022-02-10 17:36:50+00:00): Hi, CHiLLrunning, welcome ! No worries we know that OSM is difficult for beginners. 
You would help us a lot if you could tell / show us what exactly Strava told you to do withOSM and what kind of starting point this is. Is this a virtual startingpoint or is there a sign on the street that says "starting point" ?   

Feel free to respond either here or on the forum. A copy or link to a screenshot from the directions Strava gave you would be very welcom. Thx!
CHiLLrunning_nl (2022-02-10 17:40:09+00:00): Eggie
Can I send you a mail with an example of the map they use in Strava? They really say we cab add points in OSM. While I understound of you this is not true
CHiLLrunning_nl (2022-02-10 17:44:33+00:00): I cannot answer your mails since they are “noreply”
multimodaal (2022-02-10 17:45:47+00:00): Hi, thx! You can send me an email via 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/multimodaal

Cheers!
eggie (2022-02-10 22:14:28+00:00): Chillrunning.. Volg svp nog even dit draadje... Dat zal wat verheldering geven.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=854950#p854950
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-02-11 11:29:32+00:00): Dag Chillrunning
We wachten even af wat het antwoord van Strava is..  
Zelf denk ik niet dat Strava en/of OSM iets met deze tagging aankan. Het heeft eigenlijk geen speciale tag die aangeeft wat het is.
Het zal ook niet renderen of een symbool geven. 
En wat niet zichtbaar in het veld is (of staat er een bordje?)   gaat dan op wat uitzonderingen na tegen de conventie van OSM in. 

Mapse,
eggie
CHiLLrunning_nl (2022-02-12 11:17:39+00:00): Er staat geen bord. Het is een punt waar vandaan al onze trainingen starten.
Vergelijkbaar met startpoint Zaltbommel DutchRunners op Beersteeg in Zaltbommel
multimodaal (2022-02-12 11:24:35+00:00): Hoi, zie mijn PM: in dat geval passen ze niet goed in de OSM-database en kan je de punten in een van de in de PM genoemde andere databases opnemen/weergeven. Verwijder je de punten zelf uit OSM?  Thx!
multimodaal (2022-02-12 12:02:16+00:00): Hoi , ik heb de twee startpunten verwijderd nav het verzoek in je PM. 
Hoop dat je wel blijft mappen voor de in het veld waarneembare punten (-:
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:38:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
38446 (2022-02-28 07:09:53+00:00): Peppek, du hast hier ein Gebäude in Niedersachsen mit Hinweis auf ein Luftbild aus Sachsen-Anhalt gelöscht. Ist dir klar, dass die Luftbilder aus Sachsen-Anhalt Niedersachsen prinzipiell nicht abbilden? Hast du irgendwelche anderen Hinweise (persönliche Kontrolle) darauf, dass dieses Gebäude nicht mehr existiert? Falls nicht, solltest du deine Änderung zurücknehmen. In allen anderen Luftbildern existiert hier nämlich ein Gebäude. Darüberhinaus möchte ich dich bitten, aussagekräftige Beschreibungen deiner Changesets bereitzustellen ("Allgemein" ist zu allgemein). Danke.
Peppek (2022-02-28 10:27:28+00:00): Die Info, das dort kein Gebäude mehr ist hab ich von einem Ortskundigen Arbeitskollegen erhalten. Werde mich aber zur Sicherheit selber nochmal Überzeugen. 
Das mit den Beschreibungen werde ich selbtverständlich beherzigen
ovruni (2022-02-10 23:35:07+00:00): Hola ildo muhary putra, he notado que tanto en este como en el conjunto de cambios 117238227, se han agregado vías indicando que se ha usado "Bing Maps,", las cuales no se divisan en esta imagen aérea, por lo cual han sido eliminadas. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú
Saludos
canfe (2022-02-10 14:32:20+00:00): Ma è proprio un footway o è un path come scritto nel soggetto?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117239129
aspirina_e_coca (2022-02-11 08:43:21+00:00): Hai ragione!è un path. ho provveduto a modificare anche un altro paio di tracciati in zona. Grazie mille
canfe (2022-02-11 17:44:20+00:00): Ti ringrazio per le preziose mappature.
Mappi bene ma io son sempre attento alle possibili "dissonanze" che generano in me bonari sospetti.
eggie (2022-02-10 10:59:52+00:00): Beste 
name= startpoint BommelsPieterPad
Good practice    

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Good_practice 

Dit hoort volgens de conventie van OSM niet op de kaart.

Is het verifieerbaar ter plaatse? 
MVG
eggie
CHiLLrunning_nl (2022-02-10 13:55:42+00:00): “Good practice “ should not be on it!
CHiLLrunning_nl (2022-02-10 13:57:06+00:00): I’m adding startpoints for runners on Strava
CHiLLrunning_nl (2022-02-10 13:57:43+00:00): Thus point is 
Startpoint BommelsPieterPad
eggie (2022-02-10 14:53:40+00:00): Hi ...  but adding a startpoint is not according the convention of mapping in OSM.
That's the 'other' point.
Please revert your contribution. 
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-02-10 14:55:33+00:00): You may use your own layer in OSM..

Please look at http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/
CHiLLrunning_nl (2022-02-10 17:48:50+00:00): I will take a look at that tomorrow. Sorry for the trouble. Thanks for hour patience💫 CHiLL greetings Karen
CHiLLrunning💫
eggie (2022-02-10 17:53:18+00:00): No problem Karen .. Anyway  I restored the landuse here from wrong parkedits (former mapper) ...
Please look to morrow at wiki for the cannons.
I may contact Multimodaal  for help.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-02-10 18:03:41+00:00): .. en de correspondentie op de changesets hier kan gewoon in het Nederlands
multimodaal (2022-02-12 12:02:55+00:00): Verwijderd op verzoek mapper (punt in veld niet waarneebaar), zie verder https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117238589
Lee Carré (2022-02-14 20:19:12+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Lee Carré (2022-02-14 20:50:13+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments too.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-11 03:36:00+00:00): Please respect One Feature One Object. Those 2 are for the (abandoned) villages, not the entire area. Add a new point, rather than changing them.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-11 03:34:46+00:00): You caused a dragged point here.
pio2_122 (2022-02-10 16:22:31+00:00): What is the source of this data?
mambus (2022-02-14 09:55:21+00:00): https://www.eswinoujscie.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/paln-orientacyjny-Dargobadz-Troszyn-2048x518.jpg
mambus (2022-02-14 09:55:47+00:00): https://www.eswinoujscie.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/paln-orientacyjny-Dargobadz-Troszyn.jpg
pitscheplatsch (2022-02-10 12:32:56+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I guess something went wrong with your import script? You removed your failed imported duplicate highways (462)? Weird.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
highflyer74 (2022-04-11 06:07:06+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Mir fiel auf, dass Du dieser Ladestation einen Namen gegeben hast. Beachte bitte, dass wir in OSM Namen nur vergeben, wenn etwas wirklich einen Eigennamen hat.

Da die Ladestation keinen Namen hat, habe ich ihn wieder entfernt. Danke aber für das Hinzufügen der Information, für wen diese Ladestation nutzbar ist.

Weitere Informationen findest Du hier:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Wenn Du noch Fragen hast, melde Dich gern.

Viele Grüße aus HB :-)
PedroMTG13 (2022-02-10 12:38:54+00:00): Hi,
Can you explain why are you deleting so many pedestrian areas?
PedroMTG13 (2022-02-11 15:01:09+00:00): Hi again, 

In the portuguese OSM forun we have been following you recent changes in Porto. We agreed, that for AREAS, the most correct tag is pedestrian and not footway, as it does not show in the present renders tiles of the map. 
With that, we ask you to revert the changes in this changeset. to highway=pedestrian

Salutations,
PedroMTG13
4b696d (2022-02-11 21:09:22+00:00): Hi,
so you are basically saying that you want to do mapping for the renderer in order to make some maps look better even though it is highly discouraged in OSM ?-> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
You are asking me to break one of the fundamental rules of OSM.

There were sidewalks that narrowed down to as little as 40 cm that were tagged as highway=pedestrian. Those are clearly not what is meant to be tagged as pedestrian areas. highway=pedestrian is not appropriate for every place where people can stand and not for sidewalks. Pedestrian areas are things like "Praca de/do ..." or major roads in the city center.

I am not against micro mapping, that is why I tried to find a better tag for the sidewalks. There should be a difference between sidewalks and huge places.

Another problem with sidewalks tagged as pedestrian areas is routing. You will get weird if not unusable results when you have route able areas everywhere. OSM is not a map to look at, it is a database that fulfills several purposes.

All the best
dolomynum (2022-02-24 07:25:14+00:00): Please do something, these areas broke the routing in our navigation app!

The current footway areas are not connected, so if I'm matching to one, I cannot go to another one, cannot cross the street etc, in fact I cannot make routes!

If you are able to go from point A to point B as a pedestrian, then OSM should have a connection between them! Now there are lots of isolated islands!
dolomynum (2022-03-09 08:37:36+00:00): Please fix these ASAP before I start deleting them! OSM is not something to look at, it's something for navi apps to use! And the many ISOLATED foot areas BROKE the pedestrian navigation!
PLima785 (2022-02-10 13:29:55+00:00): Hello there,
Dont delete the trees!
Most of them are part of routes explaining there history
https://www.100milarvores.pt/porto-rota-das-arvores-2021-2022

Salutations,
Pedro Lima
ivanbranco (2022-02-11 21:18:31+00:00): Hi Roshan,

the language code for Nepali is name:nep=*, not name name:ne <Nepali>=*

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1030014917
Dimacn (2022-02-10 11:59:40+00:00): Пожалуйста редактируйте аккуратнее! Своими действиями вы уничтожили перекрёсток:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/471855787#map=17/55.67095/33.27698
Dimacn (2022-02-16 11:25:04+00:00): Т.к. вы не стали исправлять перекрёсток, и для восстановления перекрёстка я отменил ваши пакеты правок - 117242091, 117241808, 117241408
G_P_J (2022-02-13 06:44:14+00:00): Please don't change long names of streets in Poland. If you need to add official name please use official_name= tag instead of changing existing names.
NastassiaKalesnikava (2022-02-16 08:40:15+00:00): Thank you!
RicoElectrico (2022-02-16 15:41:24+00:00): Please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic - and you can always ask about particular cases on the forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
Vinber-Pro (2022-02-10 12:41:26+00:00): Cela créé un doublon avec le batiment, nous ne nous sommes pas compris sur l'échange de la note :).
Je transfère les données et je sors le name qui est descriptif :)
COCMOP (2022-02-10 13:55:27+00:00): Oups autant pour moi! Merci.
sorcrosc (2022-02-10 22:31:28+00:00): Hi,
I see some problems with oneway tags in your changes. Also, what is the source for the names you added?

Thanks
StpnGeorg (2022-02-11 07:54:18+00:00): Ciao.

I did not add the oneway tag I only added the name. 
I work for a delivery company and they provide address data and coordinates. I review them and validate them with OpenAddresses, Google and Here. Is there an issue with it?

✌️
sorcrosc (2022-02-11 20:58:45+00:00): This way is now tagged oneway=yes and one branch to the roundabout was deleted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/156739567
This way got oneway=-1:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31864895

I asked about the source of names because this is not stated in the changeset. Google and Here is obviously not good as source. I don't know about OpenAddresses.

cheers
wkdgs (2022-03-03 13:15:20+00:00): Hi,

ich glaube das "vehicle=no" macht hier keinen Sinn. Die Zugangsbeschränkung ist ja schon durch "bicycle=designated" und "motor_vehicle=yes" korrekt beschrieben.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117242058
jeysal (2022-03-03 14:04:31+00:00): Hi, das Wiki empfiehlt dieses Tagging: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:bicycle_road#Tagging und auch beim Kfz-frei-Zusatzzeichen wird gesagt "Das Tag vehicle=no kann bestehen bleiben."

Es könnte ja auch z.B. statt Kfz-frei ein Motorrad-frei-Zusatzschild angebracht werden, dann müsste nur der Tag für das Zusatzschild `motor_vehicle=yes` durch `motorcycle=yes` ersetzt werden und die Beschränkung `vehicle=no` bleibt einfach bestehen und untersagt z.B.  `motorcar`s implizit korrekterweise die Durchfahrt.

Stimme dem Wiki daher zu und finde das so sauberer, auch wenn es effektiv keinen Unterschied gibt, da `vehicle` nur aus den Kategorien `bicycle` und `motor_vehicle` besteht*.

*Streng genommen gibt es auch noch die dritte Kategorie `carriage` in `vehicle`, und es könnte natürlich auch zukünftig eine vierte Kategorie von `vehicle`s dazukommen, aber mit so arkanen Details wollte ich jetzt hier nicht argumentieren 😅
Dimacn (2022-02-10 11:44:46+00:00): Не надо добавлять новые дороги поверх существующих, вы же их дублируете так! Нужно редактировать и изменять то, что уже есть. В данном случае надо было разрезать улицу в требуемых местах и вписать название улицы для полученных участков.
janolezab (2022-02-10 11:55:48+00:00): Hey, welcome to OSM.

May I recommend this wiki article to you? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
NieWnen (2022-04-17 13:59:44+00:00): Skąd ten adres dla budynku Uniq logistic? W danych urzędowych taki nie istnieje.
NieWnen (2022-04-19 11:56:10+00:00): Ok, taki adres nie istnieje wg e-mapy. Poprawiłem.
Lee Carré (2022-02-14 20:16:11+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-04-21 02:05:29+00:00): olá, peço que reveja as regras de como escrever o nome de objectos, não deverá constar elementos descritivos ou o estado do edifício https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Boas_práticas#N.C3.A3o_usar_a_etiqueta_name.3D.2A_para_descrever_coisas
DiogoBaptista98 (2022-10-11 17:12:31+00:00): inacreditavelmente não obtive resposta qualquer da sua parte, o OSM é um projecto colaborativo, não só de uma pessoa, a comunicação entre membros é indispensável nesta plataforma, peço que seja mais atento aos comentários que recebe e cumpra com a sua parte comunicativa. cumprimentos
paulo106 (2022-10-12 09:31:32+00:00): Bom dia, quanto a resposta. Não tinha percebido que dava para responder aqui. Tinha enviado email em resposta a mensagem, mas deu-me como endereço invalido. As minhas desculpas.
pesec (2022-02-11 04:04:00+00:00): Добрый день.
Вы исправили дорогу на track не обоснованно. Это технический проезд к площадке.
Изучите внимательно правила обозначения дорог и проездов.
literan (2022-02-10 16:21:19+00:00): не понимаю, зачем вы тут https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481102996/history#map=18/55.20945/36.95902 (и напротив) добавили дубли заправок. Удалю
GrauKatze (2022-02-10 21:49:01+00:00): Мне просто не показал редактор там заправки, извиняюсь.
literan (2022-02-11 07:44:50+00:00): там теги заправок на полигонах стоят. Наверное, iD опять тормозит (уже сотый камень в его огород) и считает, что теги заправки не могут стоять на полигоне
Dimacn (2022-02-11 08:51:54+00:00): Справедливости ради, всё там нормально с iD. Вполне всё считает и отображает. В данном случае плотность объектов не позволяет отобразить значок заправки, а без объектов отображает на любом масштабе. А вот Josm значок заправки вообще не рисует.
fikthor (2022-02-10 12:54:30+00:00): Proszę nie zatwierdzać tych zmian, dziękuję.
syntex (2022-02-10 15:06:47+00:00): Wysłanie zestawu zmian = umieszczenie ich w bazie danych. Jeśli zmiany są testowe to nie należy ich wysyłać. Wycofałem ten zestaw zmian. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117250192
ElliottPlack (2022-02-10 23:00:25+00:00): Anything else to revert for this one?
ElliottPlack (2022-02-10 23:03:15+00:00): Blocked https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5680
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-11 00:13:48+00:00): There is a lot more from years ago but a lot of the roads have been added back.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117244834
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-11 00:22:33+00:00): Mostly sidewalks and I'm not sure how to only revert sidewalks.
Larmax (2022-02-10 21:13:42+00:00): Moi, highway=living_street on tarkoitettu vain pihakaduille, joka on eri tietyyppi tavallisesta ajotiestä, jossa pätee omat liikennesääntönsä: https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pihakatu Onko pihakauduiksi merkitsemilläsi teillä pihakadun kylttiä?
SergeiRamos (2022-02-11 06:12:17+00:00): Pihakatu se tosiaan ole. Onko kävelytie parempi?
Kyseessä on taloyhtiön hiekkakäytävä.
Larmax (2022-02-11 09:00:11+00:00): Varmaan on, jos väylällä ei ajeta esim. pysäköintialueelle tai huoltoajoa
SergeiRamos (2022-02-11 10:27:56+00:00): Ei minkäänlaista ajoneuvoliikennettä.
5m4u9 (2022-02-14 23:28:26+00:00): Hola, gracias por mejorar el nombre. En La Paz estamos usando guión medio (-) para separar varios nombres.
user_5359 (2022-02-11 11:50:10+00:00): Hallo! Kurzer Hinweis auf a) Deinen Tippfehler cliub statt club und b) auf den Wert: Dort steht nicht der Eigentümer sondern der Typ des Clubs.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-07-20 13:38:29+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3789757 ?
AgusQui (2022-02-12 03:28:56+00:00): Si bien el 133 suele desviarse por Roosevelt porque Blanco Encalada es un quilombo, no cambio el recorrido, el desvio es eventual
i2004 (2022-02-12 19:48:09+00:00): ok