piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Something B (2018-09-03 21:11:29+00:00): Здравствуйте, literan!
 Из wiki следует, что:
a) тег leisure = sauna должен использоваться для саун (и только для саун);
b) тег amenity = public_bath для общественных бань.
Если я ошибаюсь, поправьте меня, пожалуйста.
Something B (2018-09-03 21:59:14+00:00): P.S. Для меня опорой были https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs%3ATag%3Aamenity%3Dpublic_bath и https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dsauna из которых следует, что сауна и баня это не одно и тоже. Типичные бани в странах ex-USSR не соответствуют понятию "сауна" в обычном понимании, если как минимум она не позиционируется как сауна. Первая статья относит к public_bath сенто, которые есть обычные бани для мытья тела. amenity = public_bath не всегда расположены на горячих источниках, это широкий тег. Тем не менее, если я ошибаюсь или заблуждаюсь, то я могу исправить теги.
literan (2018-09-04 08:24:27+00:00): Навскидку, https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A1%D1%8D%D0%BD%D1%82%D0%BE Сэнто это общественные бани, в которых есть бассейны с горячей водой. Судя по картинкам, зачастую это открытые бассейны
Something B (2018-09-04 08:27:39+00:00): Наличие бассейна является принципиальным? Если да, я исправлю, но также желательно уточнить wiki.
Something B (2018-09-04 10:05:10+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Swimming_and_bathing здесь пишется, что amenity = public_bath есть "нечто большее, чем просто душ", а https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:amenity определяет amenity = shower как "общественная баня или душ".
Something B (2018-09-04 10:19:38+00:00): Хотя если исходить из толкования "bath" то это больше подходит к мытью путем погружения в воду. Для обычных бань (не действительно саун) больше подходит amenity = shower.
Something B (2018-09-04 13:33:28+00:00): Если обсуждение будет вестись на форуме, не забудьте пригласить меня.
maraf24 (2018-09-07 20:56:33+00:00): To nie jest pole uprawne.
maraf24 (2018-09-07 20:53:46+00:00): To jest kolejny fałszywy adres, który umieściłeś na mapie.
maraf24 (2018-09-07 20:35:02+00:00): Ja tu nie widzę żadnego dodanie punktu, tylko wstawienie typu wieży.
Usuwam, bo to nie jest wieża komunikacyjna.
Commodoortje (2018-10-04 09:05:01+00:00): Henk, 
Wil je dit aanpassen.
Crossing highways
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622145169
eggie (2018-09-03 06:33:37+00:00): Beste mapper,
Wanneer je wegen waar fietsroutes overheen lopen gaat splitsen gaat de fietsroute helaas kapot. Die fout zit in editor iD. Ik zie dat het vanmorgen heel vroeg al is hersteld door onze fietsroutespecialist. 
Fietsroutes bewerken kan wel met editor JOSM. Wanneer je fietspaden tegenkomt waar fietsroutes lopen vraag dan eerst even om advies op het forum. Het is specialistenwerk. Die routerelaties zijn nodig voor een juiste routering in gps en routeplanner.  Er zijn genoeg mappers die je dan willen helpen. 
Graag reactie.
Eggie

ps. Kijk eens bij bij editor JOSM: 
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
eggie (2018-09-03 08:33:46+00:00): In de fietskaartlayer kun je zien waar de fietsroutes lopen. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.66957/4.81755&layers=C
DavidJayMartin (2018-09-02 23:21:15+00:00): Didn't realize OpenStreet had copied my note from my previous edit.  This is is obviously not Eastmoor.  Created new area for the Mayfair neighborhood.
muralito (2019-01-08 17:57:07+00:00): The power=plant is in the relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7646101, not in the dam way.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-03 00:52:33+00:00): hi, noticed you deleted a couple of upstreams of the levadas. please do not delete as these are reference points to users that do canyoning so that they know where they can get in or out of the canyon. please revert
Singvogel (2018-09-03 10:21:23+00:00): Hi, which area do you mean exactly? Near the madre of Levada Fajã do Rodrigues? It's correct, I removed some levada sections, but these were duplicated ones, where there were two instead on one.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-03 12:46:40+00:00): yes, but it shouldn't be tagged as dam
Singvogel (2018-09-03 23:26:46+00:00): I agree, it should not be a dam. I moved an already existing node from user Pfader1957 who tagged it this way.
I reverted the previous nodes, paths and waterways in the Madre area. I also kept my new levada path (south of the old one and more curvy). I believe it shows the reality much better than the older tracks do. Can you have a look what there is still needed for canyoning and maybe delete unnecessary objects?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-09-03 23:27:55+00:00): thanks for understanding. keep up the good work
Carto'Cité (2018-09-08 16:29:11+00:00): Bonjour Salimbens,
Vous avez ajouté une piste cyclable le long de la Rue de la République, de part et d'autre. Cette rue comprenait déjà l'information de la présence d'une bande cyclable. Pouvez-vous confirmer qu'il s'agit bien d'une piste cyclable ? Si c'est bien le cas je doute qu'elle soit cumulé avec un bande cyclable et il faudra donc supprimer l'information concernant cette bande cyclable. Merci d'avance pour votre aide.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
glglgl (2018-09-04 11:46:49+00:00): Again me, again with the same issue: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34121637 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/34121638 overlap each other.
25or6to4 (2018-09-04 12:08:22+00:00): Got it, thanks!  All fixed.
AgusQui (2018-09-11 02:47:28+00:00): Hola robercarreras, por convención las vías de ferrocarril las nombramos como FC Sarmiento, FC Roca, etc.:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Wikiproyecto_Argentina/Ferrocarriles
eggie (2018-09-03 20:19:14+00:00): Dit is verder prima.
Nakaner (2018-09-05 14:29:48+00:00): Hi beweta,

please do not copy names from Wikipedia, Wikidata or any other website which can be seen as a register or database of names ("database" not to be interpreted literally as IT folks would do).

Reasons:

1. Wikipedia is licensed under the terms of CC-BY-SA which is not compatible with the OSM license.

2. Wikipedia and Wikidata does not care that much for copyright than we do. They don't see Wikipedia as a database and therefore ignore database rights. However, OpenStreetMap is a database. In addition, they claim that the Wikimedia Foundation, the operator of the various Wikipedias in all the languages, is located in the U.S. where these rights do not exist. However, the OSMF is located in a country where the EU Database Directive applies (and will apply). The OSMF wants that its database is usable everywhere and therefore avoids anything which can be illegal.

That's why other users or the DWG might feel the need to remove your additions of names.

If you think that this comment is not appropriate, threatening or something else, don't hestiate to file a complaint at data@osmfoundation.org

Best regards

Michael
luschi (2019-03-22 17:27:36+00:00): +1 @Nakaner
Chris Fleming (2018-09-03 20:46:41+00:00): What's going on here, you created a road and then delted it a few days later. I want to be able to trust these Amazon Logistics edits but I can't really figure out what sources of data you are using or why thigns like adding a road and then deleting it later happen?
talukdm (2019-07-08 15:08:03+00:00): Hi Chris Fleming,

Apologies for the delayed response. Thanks for commenting on the changeset. In first place the road segment was drawn over the building which is wrong. In review process the segment should’ve been aligned properly instead of deleting. It’s a clear mistake. Thanks for the update I will follow the suggestions from OSM community going forward.

Regards,
Talukdm
jeka p (2018-09-15 08:54:50+00:00): Hallo,

kennst Du die Möglichkeit die Bürgersteige, die von der Fahrbahn nur mit Bordstein abgetrennt sind,
als Teil der Strasse zu taggen?
z.B. highway=residential + sidewalk=left/right/both/none
VG,
Jeka



https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sidewalk
ralley (2018-09-03 00:56:18+00:00): Title is wrong, this was Owairaka Domaina details
Chris Fleming (2018-09-03 20:48:28+00:00): What is going on here?
yaswap (2019-07-10 08:38:22+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the edit and apologies for the delayed response. The segment was added first and deleted later because it was created over physical median.

yaswap on behalf of baindran(inactive user)
aharvey (2018-09-03 13:03:26+00:00): Was this split for any particular reason? Generally you only need to split a way if you need different tags on different segments or making only one segment part of a relation.
Supaplex (2018-09-03 04:04:23+00:00): 澳盛(台灣)商業銀行國際金融業務分行. 地址, 忠孝東路五段68號39樓及40樓A1、A2室. 電話, 02-8722-5000
澳盛(台灣)商業銀行營業部. 地址, 忠孝東路五段68號39樓及40樓A1、A2室. 電話, 02-8722 5000
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62232785
freebeer (2019-05-11 11:58:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70135798 where the changeset comment is: this edit consists solely of fake maps.me bogus home castles with personal info and other wrongly tagged items that are of private interest and should not be on osm
woodpeck (2018-10-17 22:53:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/569053713 did you set layer=-33 on purpose or is it a typo?
MacLondon (2018-10-17 23:11:22+00:00): Definite typo. I think layer=-33 might well be in Australia! I've corrected it now.
mueschel (2018-09-04 09:30:26+00:00): Please don't use OSM as a testing database - it is a world-wide used database that is now missing thousands of buildings. To test software, please use the development server:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_the_dev_server
mueschel (2018-09-04 09:42:26+00:00): This changeset was reverted in #62272269
viloan (2018-09-03 02:30:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Chris Fleming (2018-09-03 20:49:03+00:00): What is going on, you added and road and then later delete is?
payelgh (2019-07-08 15:08:57+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for looking into the changeset. Same like the previous changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62231993) Due to some miscommunication I deleted the road segments that were created.  Going forward we will make sure that these kind of errors won’t occur.

Regards,
Payelgh
muralito (2018-09-03 13:17:48+00:00): Hola. El area=yes es para marcar una zona ruteable, que no parece ser el caso.

Las canchas se marcan con leisure=pitch y sport=padel Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dpadel

Todo el complejo podria marcarse con leisure=sports_centre
Ver https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dsports_centre
mueschel (2018-09-04 09:35:02+00:00): This changeset was reverted in #62272112 .
Rich1234 (2018-09-03 04:46:34+00:00): Why did you delete this service road.  In both the Mapbox satellite (which you said you used) and the Esri imagery, there is a physical island in this location on the map, so the original dual service roads were correctly mapping the on the ground layout of the road network.

With your change, the OSM way is now indicating that one could drive directly over a concrete curb, which is not correct.
tmadhuli (2018-09-03 04:58:33+00:00): Created the road segment at it's previous location.
literan (2018-09-03 12:43:38+00:00): Hallo. Why did you merged guard_rail line with highway line in this changeset? https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62234393/ Bad edit, reverted.
SomeoneElse (2018-09-03 12:49:02+00:00): What's the source of your change here?  Have you visited it?
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-03 18:32:43+00:00): Yes, this is one of the hundreds of stadiums I visited.
tux67 (2018-09-07 14:49:58+00:00): Hallo ErwinWeingang, 
Bushaltestellen mit den Liniennnummern im Namen zu versehen, ist nicht in Sinne der OSM Regeln, die für den ÖPNV und Namen im allgemeinen gelten: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
Die Beziehung zwischen Haltestelle und Buslinie sollte in der Relation ausgedrückt werden und nicht im Namen: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Public_transport#Fahrtvariante.2FRoutenrelation
In diesem Sinne möchte ich dich bitten alle diese Namenseinträge zurückzunehmen. 
Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion. 
Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht Stephan (tux67)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/62234907
axelr (2020-04-05 19:54:34+00:00): Zu Parkstraße: Man kann route_ref=008;009;010;019 einsetzen. Diese Angabe sollte jedoch wegen des hohen Wartungsaufwandes sparsam verwendet werden. Bei Busbahnhöfen macht sie Sinn, wenn in Fahrplänen die Steige nicht vermerkt sind.
SomeoneElse (2018-09-03 12:47:27+00:00): Your name change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/554256656/history here looks like another name that you have made up.  What was wrong with the previous name?  What evidence do you have that it was wrong and your new name is correct?
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-03 18:34:29+00:00): I didn't made this name up. Here you can see that "Mend-A-Hose Jungle" really is the official stadium name: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyleague/article-2405382/Rugby-League-Castleford-Tigers-rename-stadium-Mend-A-Hose-Jungle.html
SomeoneElse (2018-09-03 19:15:19+00:00): Yes, it really is called The "Mend-A-Hose Jungle" but it's not called The "Mend-A-Hose Jungle (Wheldon Road)" which is what you have called it.
See https://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/castleford-tigers/castleford-tigers-home-is-renamed-for-third-time-1-5187083 for the full name history, where "Jungle" came from and why it's still used (Tigers - geddit?) in a slightly more reputable newspaper than the Mail...
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-04 06:50:08+00:00): Thanks. Can you please explain to me how the alt_name can be added? I can't find it over here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:alt_name
SomeoneElse (2018-09-04 07:17:56+00:00): If I click on the stadium in the iD editor the "all tags" list contains it.  Currently "alt_name" is set to "Mend-A-Hose Jungle" and "name" is set to "Mend-A-Hose Jungle (Wheldon Road)".  If you don't see a list below "all tags" you may need to click the icon to expand it.
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-04 07:49:50+00:00): Thanks, now I understand. "alt_name" is "Mend-A-Hose Jungle" and "name" is "Wheldon Road" is okay I guess?
SomeoneElse (2018-09-04 08:00:05+00:00): Yes (or the other way around)
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-04 08:06:44+00:00): Thanks! :)
Supaplex (2019-02-07 02:53:21+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
TagaSanPedroAko (2018-09-05 23:42:45+00:00): Why will this have a large bounding box that even covers Malaysia, Indonesia, and Brunei?
Neela21 (2018-09-06 00:56:54+00:00): Hi TagaSanPedroAko,

Thanks for the feedback.
I am looking at the edits mentioned, will revert back with the observations as soon as possible.

Thanks,
neela.
Neela21 (2018-09-06 01:30:27+00:00): Hi TagaSanPedroAko,

I have checked the edits mentioned, prior to Manila i worked on Bandung and during our internal quality check i have got feedback and worked on it but missed uploading the road added  and continued my work with Manila which led to larger bounding box.

Apologise for the error. Will ensure this is not repeated moving forward.

Thanks,
neela
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-03-18 15:17:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148822076 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some anti-Mormon vandalism and other rubbish
abakus_uploader (2018-09-03 22:30:52+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2018-09-03 07:10:11+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht: 
► Uw node samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode
Ze0zohk1 (2022-02-23 14:00:52+00:00): Hallo Peilscheibe,

mir ist vorhin aufgefallen, dass du (vor einige Zeit), diesen Container (www.osm.org/node/1713281416/history) mit recycling:glass=yes getraggt hast. Das ist IMO falsch. In Glascontainer wie diese kann man nur Flaschen einwerfen und z. B. keine Glasscheiben (recycling:glass). Dort wo die Stadt Stuttgart zuständig ist (müsste ja der Fall sein), kann man sogar das Abfall-ABC zu rate ziehen: https://www.stuttgart.de/service/entsorgung/abfall-abc/abfall-abc/glas.php

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
Hjart (2018-09-03 07:08:37+00:00): Jeg har fjernet den fodgængerovergang du lavede midt i krydset, Hostrupvej/Kærvej. Der er ikke nogen.
GOwin (2018-09-12 23:26:51+00:00): @masumune, when digitizing features, and when you're using the Tasking Manager, make sure that you only work within your "cell", and that you don't duplicate features that has been previously digitized. 

It's better to direct your efforts in identifying and tracing unmapped features.

In this case, the road w622255280 is a duplicate of another road created two weeks earlier, w618963885.
GerdP (2018-09-24 08:45:22+00:00): Hi! Please check typo highway=yt
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622257323
Looks like track, but in this case why not simply add the nodes to way 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/622257297 ?
GerdP (2018-10-05 09:01:49+00:00): Hi! Please review these ways
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409828247
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/409828270
They were tagged highway=سه
instead of residential. I guess you wanted to add a name tag but I doubt that they both have the same name.
GerdP (2018-10-05 09:02:53+00:00): Forgot a link to my changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63223213
2maxic (2018-09-06 16:27:08+00:00): Не будет ли это вводить в заблуждение? Ведь там не проехать ))) Если вопрос с изолятом https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262421583 
Он уже был и трек не влияет.
2maxic (2018-09-06 16:39:04+00:00): Все, нашел https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
Учту на будущее. Спасибо.
Mir76 (2018-09-06 22:11:09+00:00): Думаю, что тех, кто там на машине оказался, уже очень трудно ввести в заблуждение :)
Mir76 (2018-09-06 22:12:24+00:00): Вопрос был с изолятом, но с другими - там половина улиц в Гарях повисла в воздухе.
eggie (2018-09-03 08:27:33+00:00): De reden dat toevoerwegen ook het adres dragen van de hoofdroute ligt in het feit om het mogelijk te maken adressen te vinden in de verschillende routers. Het is dus niet altijd verstandig die straatnamen te verwijderen. 
MVG,
Eggie
herbinator (2018-09-03 08:49:04+00:00): Ook niet als het niet de officiële straatnaam is? 

groet,

Herbinator
eggie (2018-09-03 09:00:31+00:00): Up to you. Vaak lijken zaken onlogisch, maar zo werkt de routering op de kaart. 
Het is zelfs van belang dat de fietspaden de straatnaam krijgen, want de hoofdrijbaan staat vaak op slot voor fietsers. Een fietsrouteplanner vindt dan nooit het adres als de naam ontbreekt op het fietspad. Wanneer in dit geval hier geen adres achter ligt maakt het niet uit, ...maar ik zie hier adressen uit het Kadaster. ... vandaar. Iets noordelijker hebben de serviceroads ook de straatnaam.
herbinator (2018-09-03 09:06:52+00:00): Daar klopt het ook en ga je naar de huizen toe. Hier is het een weg op de camping.
eggie (2018-09-03 09:08:58+00:00): Oke .. duidelijk.
Alecs01 (2018-09-03 18:34:22+00:00): One more building tag deleted from you: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6423495/history source of the name change?
stadiaarcadia (2018-09-04 07:11:41+00:00): The stadium itself reads the stadium name:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/97/Estadio_municipal_La_Victoria.jpg

I've reverted my edit, I've changed the stadium complex into "stadium" tag and the stadium building into "building" tag. Can you please check if I did this right?
Alecs01 (2018-09-03 18:31:54+00:00): Again you deleted building=yes from here https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2057576/history and also removed galician name (name:gl) you better put the leisure=stadium tag just here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24929824 I forgot how many times I told you that
zors1843 (2018-09-03 10:48:59+00:00): Naam firma ?
pfiers (2021-01-04 18:00:01+00:00): Reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96926515
aharvey (2018-09-03 12:43:24+00:00): Do you know who can actually use T-Ways, the signage I've seen just says "No Entry, Authorised T-Way Vehicles Excepted".

psv includes Taxis (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) are you sure Taxis are allowed to use the T-Way?
Maradona11 (2018-09-03 23:09:57+00:00): You are correct.  Tway should not been tagged psv=yes as Taxis are not allowed.

Im finding many of the tways tagged incorrectly and inconsistantly in and around Sydney.  What would be your recommendation tagging the Sydney Tways?  No access, Bus=yes ??
aharvey (2018-09-04 00:21:51+00:00): Thanks for confirming that. I've reverted this change, as it was correct before, access=no (as generally no one can access it) and then say who can, in this case busses acting in a public service vehicle, since it's designated and not just permitted for busses we should use bus=designated (slightly stronger than bus=yes).

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

designated means "A preferred or designated route for the class of traffic specified by the tag key, such as foot=designated, in general this means that there is a (explicit) sign saying something like "pedestrians allowed", or a pedestrian icon."
RSergei (2018-09-03 08:52:41+00:00): Неправильное пояснение. Правильное: "Изменения вдоль улицы Мельникайте"
pesec (2018-09-04 10:06:31+00:00): Вызывает сомнение необходимость повышения статуса у данного участка, т.к. транзитный транспорт может столкнуться с затруднениями проезда. Я намеренно ранее понизил статус при правке на период ремонта этого временного проезда.