piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chris66 (2022-07-06 10:49:04+00:00): Haha, gut aufgepasst.....

boat=yes was meant.

It's corrected.
St Mary Clay (2022-08-14 20:42:13+00:00): Hi saubär,

You have added a number of camera shops to the map in this changeset which don't exist.

Two examples I know not to exist:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9868879387
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9868850683

Did you use the wrong tag?  What were you trying to map at these locations?

Thanks.
Penner im Auto (2022-09-14 08:07:47+00:00): Hi, sorry for the late response.

I marked cameras I found, some of them are private cameras that are pointed to the public street. 

It's very possible that I used the wrong tag, as I dont know if private cameras should be tagged in OSM.
St Mary Clay (2022-09-15 06:02:15+00:00): From what I understand, you were mapping surveillance cameras?

If so, I think this is the tag you were looking for:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dsurveillance

The tag you used describes a shop.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcamera

If you'd like me to make that change let me know.
Penner im Auto (2022-09-17 09:07:49+00:00): Hi,

oh yes! That is exactly what I wanted to do. Yes, I would like you to make the changes, I'm not that familiar with the website. I use OSMAND for the markers and will check if it might be an error in the app too!

Thanks for the notice, I will definitely take more care in the future :-) Always learning a little bit!
St Mary Clay (2022-09-17 10:14:40+00:00): This change has been done here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126291969

Not a problem, it's easy to make mistakes.

Thank you for taking the time to improve the map.
Benoît C MdP (2022-07-06 06:20:39+00:00): Bonjour Leoriem,

Y a t il vraiment un double sens cyclable sur ce tronçon de la rue du Cardinal Lemoine (entre Saint-Germain et les quais) ? Ce n'était pas le cas il y a quelques jours.

Merci 

Benoît
Leoriem-code (2022-07-06 08:51:12+00:00): Je suis allé vérifié et non en effet la rue est à sens unique. Je me suis laissé trompé par un vélo qui l'a pris dans le mauvais sens.
Merci pour cette remarque, je vais le changer de ce pas.
ivanbranco (2024-08-02 17:51:36+00:00): Hi Alberto, you added the same image to ten different banks: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1P9t
Only one can be correct, do you know which one?

Also what's the meaning of date=1982? Is it the date of opening? In such case start_date=1982 could be used.

Wiki tags should identify the specific element, in such case the specific branch. Since is not the case I propose to change them with brand:wikidata/brand:wikipedia

thanks and good mapping
cserpell (2022-07-05 20:03:51+00:00): Hi,

I would like to know why you are changing private access tags to permissive, even in places that are not open to the public.
PlinyTheYoungest (2022-07-06 17:00:05+00:00): Hi cserpell, thanks for reaching out. I was under the impression people were allowed to enter the condominium with permission. I am happy to revert my edit if you think access=private is a more appropriate tag, thank you.
danieldegroot2 (2022-07-22 20:46:36+00:00): From https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3263525

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/862406520/history

It looks like this segment has been mostly abandoned in favour of
- the track which continues on the west side of US 191
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16835230/history
- via an intersection on US 191, getting to the continuation of this old road.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076164809/history

I would suggest adding the "abandoned:" lifecycle prefix, as it is still somewhat visible due to the little traffic it may still get. Otherwise, it's suggested to remove it.

Also, please leave a comment on the note mentioned at the top of this comment (and close it once this has been changed or otherwise resolved).
ivanbranco (2022-07-08 19:18:25+00:00): Ciao Giulio,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12315259
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12315258
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12315257

Noto dei problemI:
1. admin_centre è un ruolo riservato alle relazione type=boundary, non type=multipolygon
2. Il tag place=* viene ripetuto sia sulla relazione che sul nodo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
3. I place sono differenti tra loro, le relazioni sono tutte place hamlet, i nodi neighbourhood o isolated_dwelling.

Riesci a dargli un'occhiata?
MxxCon (2022-07-06 04:20:26+00:00): Hello.
This edit doesn't seem correct.
First you mapped benches as being part of the footpath. That is most definitely not the case :)
2nd, you added benches which you already mapped as 2 long ways, w1075430640 and w1075430639. That goes against https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element principle.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123249016
kw-ny (2022-07-06 14:35:11+00:00): The benches are weird here - there is a mixture of a concrete wall bench and a traditional bench ... they alternate.  Honestly, I don't know how to map this correctly.
MxxCon (2022-07-06 14:40:33+00:00): If they alternate then perhaps delete the long way bench and map each one as separate node (not attached to the path😉) and tag each one with appropriate material value.
muralito (2022-07-06 12:47:55+00:00): Hi. You cannot  enter the property without owner explicit permission, so access=permissive is not the right tagging.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:access=permissive
The_Intern (2022-07-06 18:49:46+00:00): Hi muralito, thanks for the message. I have updated the tags
MxxCon (2022-07-06 04:32:26+00:00): Hello.
According to documentation on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane, there are couple of issues with your edit.
First is this kind of parking should be tagged as property of the way, not as a separate polygon.
Additionally, this appears to be "on_street" parking, not "street_side". Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking:lane#Distinguishing_between_on_street_and_street_side for more detailed explanation and other examples.
This needs to be fixed 👍
kw-ny (2022-07-06 14:29:25+00:00): I deleted this as I don't' know how to do it properly - see changeset 123280801 - can you add it properly?
MxxCon (2022-07-06 14:56:43+00:00): I updated it. You can see what I changed here https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123281581
n76 (2022-07-05 22:21:30+00:00): It has been about 3 months since I have driven to Oracle but I have driven there quite a bit over the years so I am familiar with the road.

You show connections from the current highway to the old in places I do not recall nor do I see in current aerial imagery. In addition, those abandoned sections are not signed with a name.

What are your goals for adding in these non-existent connections? Why the name?
eggie (2023-08-17 21:44:48+00:00): Beste Bert... Je maakt de kaart onwerkbaar door overal de landuse aan de wegen te plakken.
Stel je procedure voor op het forum zodat we dat allemaal volgen, maar voorlopig is de consensus om dat niet te doen.
MVG
eggie
DressyPear4 (2022-07-09 14:01:22+00:00): Olá, a geometria de constituir o contorno correto, evite ficar criando estes círculos aleatórios, no qual não condiz com a realidade
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123249744
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-02-02 22:18:55+00:00): What's the source for this golf course?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123250021
Pink Duck (2022-07-06 12:55:03+00:00): Perhaps remove path=right, path:surface=grass etc. tags from adjacent road way when explicitly mapping.
sarukwa (2022-07-07 19:54:18+00:00): Hi, and thanks, i did not check the road tags. I will attend to this.
ivanbranco (2022-07-08 10:58:50+00:00): Ciao Botaler,

anche qua hai inserito lo stesso ref:mise univoco su due differenti benzinai:
1. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9868994410
2. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9868994400

Penso che Osmose non sia piu' molto affidabile per quanto riguarda i benzinai.
Botaler (2022-07-08 12:17:40+00:00): Errore mio. Un tempo quando effettuavo una variazione su Osm, coloravo di verde il record sul database Mise appena scaricato. In questo caso ho creato esattamente il nodo 9868994410 nella posizione indicata dal Mise, con l'opzione "fix-josm" di Osmose, e tolto il distributore dalla tettoia id=256454611 alla quale era abbinato, senza colorare il record del Mise che avevo cautelativamente scaricato e controllato. Nello stesso changeset ho separato il distributore dall'edificio id=200740352 (che non aveva solo altre due chiavi "amenity=fuel" e "source=Regione Liguria") creando manualmente un nodo sotto la vicina tettoia ed abbinandolo ai dati del "ref:mise=51733", senza controllare che la sua posizione non corrispondeva  alle coordinate del Mise.
MxxCon (2022-07-06 04:43:54+00:00): Thanks for adding that detail. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123250187
opendcc (2022-07-06 06:24:15+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen auf OpenStreetMap und viel Spaß. Darf ich Dich darauf hinweisen, dass ein Name wirklich nur der Eigenname eines Objektes ist. Also z.B. ein Haus kann einen bekannten Namen haben (z.B. Isartor), aber der Hausname ist i.d.R. nicht der Name des Bewohners oder Nutzers.

Servus
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:17:00+00:00): Agregue un nombre a la ubicación.
minimapper_osm (2022-07-05 20:39:48+00:00): I Think This Holds A Record.
DD1GJ (2022-07-05 23:33:18+00:00): Hallo, es ist nicht so optimal, eine zusätzliche Straße einzuzeichnen, nur damit die Angelstelle auf der Karte erscheint. Für solche vereinsinternen Dartellungen wäre wahrscheinlich https://umap.openstreetmap.de/ besser geeignet.
sfv Berne (2022-07-07 16:55:04+00:00): Hallo, danke für den Tip mit "umap.openstreetmap.de". Leider ist die Darstellung dort nicht ganz so gut. Ich habe auch noch keine Möglichkeit gefunden eine Fläche zu beschriften.
highflyer74 (2022-07-08 04:58:04+00:00): Moin zusammen! Ich hatte gerade einen Deiner anderen Changesets kommentiert und dann gesehen, dass hier auch schon kommentiert wurde.

Auf uMap kannst Du frei gestalten. Du kannst Linien und Flächen zeichnen, diese beschriften, das Ganze in unterschiedlichen Farben und Symbolen darstellen und auch verschiedene Karten als Hintergrund probieren.

Ansonsten schließe ich mich @DD1GJ an, da es sich um vereinsinterne Informationen handelt, die nicht so gut in eine öffentliche Datenbank passen. Viele Grüße!
highflyer74 (2022-07-08 05:09:47+00:00): Ich habe mir mal die Vereinswebsite angesehen (https://home.sfv-berne.de/index.php/karte). Die Karte dort könntet ihr sogar gegen die uMap Karte tauschen, da sich diese per iframe einbinden lässt.
kropcheck (2022-07-08 08:26:19+00:00): Bonjour, il semble qu'il y ait eu confusion entre des portails ou des contrôles d'accès à des chemins privés et la notion de magasin de portail. Pour le moment j'ai effacé les 3 magasins de portails que vous aviez ajouté. A votre dispo si vous avez besoin d'aide pour bien tagguer ces barrière ou chemins privés. Cdt.
OSMphil (2022-07-08 10:10:16+00:00): Bonjour, effectivement c'est une erreur de ma part. Je veux bien connaitre les tags à utiliser pour les chemins privés. Cdt
kropcheck (2022-07-08 13:52:58+00:00): On peut définir d'abord si un chemin est privé comme suit : access = "private". Pour plus de détail sur ce tag, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:access#Valeurs_possibles . Si vous souhaitez indiquer une barrière avec un accès contrôlé, ajouter un noeud directement sur le chemin concerné et ajouter sur ce point le tag suivant : barrier= "gate". Pour plus d'infos sur les différents types de barrières, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:barrier#Restriction_d'Acc%C3%A8s .On pourra y associé le tag précédent access = "private" pour indiqué les restrictions associés.
ovruni (2022-07-05 21:27:09+00:00): Hola FERNANDO RODRIGO FLORES LLALLIHUAMAN, la etiqueta de nombre se encuentra destinada solamente para los objetos que tienen un nombre particular, he retirado estos nombres numéricos en los edificios. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
ndm (2022-07-05 22:13:09+00:00): Pretty sure the roads aren't residential -- where are the houses?
eggie (2022-07-05 22:03:32+00:00): Dag wrt   
Goed om de zaak actueel te houden. 
Eigenlijk zouden alle winkels op een adresnode 'moeten' zegt de consensus binnen OSM Nederland.. en niet op de gebouwomtrek. 
Mocht je nog eens geroepen voelen om het aan te passen graag. Multivlaai heeft hier bv gewoon een adresnode waar je op kunt bijtaggen.
Er zal de komende tijd nog wel eens wat veranderen hier, want de Lidl gaat ook nog verhuizen naar de oude locatie van de Jumbo.


MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-05 22:46:52+00:00): Nog een tip...  Andere lokale mappers willen graag weten wat je hebt toegevoegd.
Geef dus concreet aan wat je hebt gedaan.
Meer tags zegt niemand iets.

Veel plezier met mappen..
eggie
ChehrehBargi (2023-08-14 10:12:00+00:00): سلام ضمن تشکر از تلاش شما
آخرین باری که از اینجا رد شدم از سمت کوچه مسدود بود. آیا به تازگی اینجا رو دیدید؟
ChehrehBargi (2022-07-08 05:38:25+00:00): باسلام دوست عزیز
خیابان دکتر بهشتی بیش از دو ماه است که دو طرفه شده. مسیرهایی که بنده تصحیح میکنم، حضوری دیده و اصلاح میکنم. لطفا برای تغییر ابتدا حضورا محل را ببینید.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 00:28:16+00:00): deleted
itineris (2023-11-22 14:51:23+00:00): Hi,

Is that "BMW Group Jobs" a legal source for OpenStreetMap?

Regards,
Ákos
ndm (2022-07-05 22:10:46+00:00): Looks like you're changing the administrative boundary -- it doesn't seem likely that they need updating.
drkt (2022-07-05 22:17:42+00:00): I did not mean to request review, but feel free to anyway :)
rhtb0 (2022-07-06 04:43:00+00:00): Why removed English name?
rhtb0 (2022-07-06 04:43:24+00:00): Name:en is officially road name
VLD300 (2022-07-06 16:57:46+00:00): Thank you for pointing it out and adding back the English name.  I accidentally removed it and will be more careful in the future
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-06 22:50:32+00:00): Lo siento, pero esto no es track, es pavimentada, amerita al menos residencial o unclassified :D
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-06 22:50:47+00:00): Lo siento, pero esto no es una pista, es pavimentada, amerita al menos residencial o sin clasificar :D https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61638895#map=19/14.88311/-91.42789
eggie (2022-07-06 05:04:39+00:00): Dag earlyistimeless

Het is hier geen doodlopende weg voor iedereen. Er is gewoon een paadje voor voetgangers.
Ik heb de situatie aangepast met een bollard en een stukje pad.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-06 05:31:00+00:00): Best lastig in het begin al die weetjes hoe te mappen... 
building = school is oke.. Het adres heb ik van het gebouw verwijderd.
Er zijn al adresnodes. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-06 05:18:00+00:00): Probeer svp bij te taggen op de bestaande adresnode. Dan is adres gekoppeld aan instelling.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-06 05:26:37+00:00): Beste.. 

Het adres en de amenity school en schoolinfo heb ik verwijderd.. 
Dat geeft een foutmelding. Alleen adresnodes gebruiken svp. 
Alle info staat op de adresnode.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-06 05:35:12+00:00): Buitenschoolse opvang is geen  =school..  meestal wordt childcare gebruikt.
mariotomo (2022-07-05 23:18:08+00:00): hola Rick. No he validado si están bien las ediciones. Conoces osmose?
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=10&lat=7.909&lon=-77.874&item=1xxx&level=1%2C2
mariotomo (2022-07-05 23:23:55+00:00): (en algún momento deberemos decidir de poner alguna aproximación de cobertura vegetal, sea bosque natural, cultivos para el consumo directo, pastizales, o cultivos de teka.)
Rick Morales (2022-07-05 23:38:18+00:00): Hola Mario, no conozco Osmose. Lo revisaré en un momento. Estas ediciones son de una etiqueta que por algún error de dedo cambié de "line" a "natural = ridge" esta tarde, y que no están mal del todo, pero a pesar de que la Serranía de Pirre es definitivamente un ridge, se ve un poco raro que solo un segmento lleve esa etiqueta el resto no. Así que lo volví a poner como "line". En otro momento trataré de revisar esas líneas y ajustarlas para que sigan fielmente las crestas de las cordilleras divisorias de aguas. Ahora solo las toco cuando estorban en el mapeo de los ríos.
abakus_uploader (2022-07-06 22:32:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mueschel (2022-07-21 09:39:37+00:00): Hi,
please check this POI, it got a strange 'Zestaw' tag:
http://osm.org/node/9461773967
RicoElectrico (2022-07-23 18:45:28+00:00): Must have been a copy paste error: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70490899
edc22 (2022-08-08 23:04:40+00:00): It was my copy paste error. I've fixed it.
VA00 (2024-01-24 20:58:01+00:00): A to: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1076204942 ? Teraz tam widać jakiś zbiornik.
user_5359 (2022-07-06 08:14:40+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/154336. What ist the meaning of the tag "+" = "Herzogenrath (30) - Herzogenrath (33)"
jeroenrozema74 (2022-07-06 09:31:12+00:00): Hello,
That was a mistype, ofcourse.
I already wondered where that "+" went.....(lol)
Thanks for the attention!
user_5359 (2022-07-20 08:26:42+00:00): Hello! You add a lot of nodes like http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9869253019 with the tag Sprinkler = Zone 8. What is the meaning of this tag and the license of the data.
eggie (2022-07-06 05:17:07+00:00): Dag vrijefietser..

Het is in dit geval beter om de adresnode te gebruiken ipv het hele appartementencomplex met de vele axdressen om de school toe te voegen. Kijk je nog even.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-06 05:45:03+00:00): Het adres heb ik verwijderd van het gebouw. De schoolinfo staat op adresnode nr 103
Is Binnenplein  een officele naam... Wanneer het alleen een beschrijving is gebruik dan description=   Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie
Natsuyasumi (2022-07-18 15:43:35+00:00): The changeset introduced a strange turn restriction: no right turn from Domaniewska to Wołoska (East→North). 
Are you sure about this? N36 and N86 buses are supposed to make such a turn.
NorthCrab (2022-07-18 17:06:18+00:00): Fixed it. I must have done this instinctively while editing the turn on the other side of the road (there is no right turn there since the actual turn lane is disconnected on the map).
Natsuyasumi (2022-07-19 08:23:53+00:00): Perfect, thanks :)
srbrook (2022-07-06 10:31:25+00:00): I have a problem with changes to small areas where you have removed leisure =common. Often these are separated by roads and are adjacent to larger common areas. Take a look at http://malvernhills.org.uk/looking-after/malvern-hills-map/ Changes like this need to be done with local knowledge and by examining the adjacent features not by a big edit that covers the whole country and can't be examined in achavi because it is too big.
DaveF (2022-07-06 12:13:28+00:00): Hi
Please provide a specific link to an example that you've contributed?
srbrook (2022-07-06 13:13:44+00:00): Not actually contributed by me but by people I know and trust in my local area - 
Ways: 587327934, 587327936, 91968798
Changeset: 68236387
DaveF (2022-07-06 15:13:45+00:00): Hi
I note you didn't contact iccaldwell to ask why another primary tag, 'landuse' had erroneously been added to primary tag, 'leisure'. They conflict each other.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=grass

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=common.
Half of this page discusses what's wrong with the tag & the main paragraph says how to tag it differently.

JOSM flags leisure=common as a error in it's validation process. 

If the software you use is unable to cope with your expectations, may I suggest you contact the developers, or use other programs which allows it to function as you wish.
This is a routine I use, which you may find useful:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1jVw
 
I contest it's not a "big edit". It's knowingly & intentionally kept within a single country. It neither crosses borders, oceans or continents. 

Even as an Englishman I consider 'common' & 'village green' too quaint for OSM.
Piz Pachific (2022-09-27 20:28:54+00:00): Ist der Flugplatz wirklich ein Kreis?
WAM_SNZ144_ZCH (2022-10-01 07:28:45+00:00): Ich habe lediglich die Adresse ergänzt, jedoch keine Flächen erfasst ? Kann dir leider gerade nicht weiter helfen, doch einen Kreis sollte es sicher nicht sein…
Piz Pachific (2022-10-05 11:13:54+00:00): Sorry, hatte den Kommentar beim falschen Changeset erfasst. Die Änderung in einen Kreis wurde in deinem Changeset #123255016 (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123255016) gemacht. Im #126854846 wurde es nun wieder revertiert. Nur zur Info.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2023-04-15 09:01:52+00:00): How did you come to the conclusion that there are buildings here?
eggie (2022-07-06 05:08:08+00:00): Het lijkt allemaal zo simpel, maar OSM zit vol met afspraken en regeltjes.
Zie

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard

motor_vehicle=no is default. Dus niet toevoegen svp. 
Wel is het nuttig om moped en mofa=yes toe te voegen aan een paaltje en soms motorcycle=yes.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-06 05:11:28+00:00): .....  en dat komt omdat de routingmachine altijd even achterloopt. Dus dat kun je pas de volgende dag voor osrm en/of graphhopper testen.

Ik heb het nu aangepast hier. Het moet juist routeren voor fietsers en voetgangers., maar niet voor motorvoertuigen. Dus even geduld.
Svp geen punten als noexit=yes gaan toevoegen.

MVG
eggie
earlyistimeless (2022-07-06 09:01:28+00:00): Ah oké, bedankt voor het commentaar en de verbeteringen!
eggie (2022-07-07 06:55:48+00:00): Bij mijn weten staat er nergens een bord 'bestemmingsverkeer' alleen bewoners.
Bezorgdiensten, vuilnisophaaldienst e.d.  maken bv ook gebruik van OSM. Nu werkt de routering niet meer. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=53.29028%2C5.98614%3B53.28959%2C5.98539#map=19/53.29017/5.98567

Een doorgaande weg is het toch niet, want er stat een paaltje. Wanneer er geen bord staat Bestemmingsverkeer dan beter die tag destination verwijderen.

Die routering vanuit de Gerrit Durkswei komt vanzelf goed. 

Graag reactie.. 

MVG
eggie
earlyistimeless (2022-07-07 13:59:18+00:00): Nee, dat was ook een poging om de routeplanner juist te laten werken, aangezien ik toen niet wist dat het mogelijk een dag tijd nodig heeft om te werken. Het paaltje was eerst niet gekoppeld aan de weg, misschien dat dat ervoor zorgde dat het als een doorgaande weg werd gezien.
eggie (2022-07-07 14:55:14+00:00): Ahh.. oke...  Niet gekoppeld.. dan geen effect.
Ik heb destination verwijderd.  Die weg routeert alleen maar tot het paaltje.
OSRM routeert al goed https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_car&route=53.29011%2C5.98546%3B53.28880%2C5.98542#map=18/53.28956/5.98619

GraphHopper heeft nog wat meer tijd nodig.
Gr eggie
SafetyIng (2022-07-06 20:38:48+00:00): Hey,

"building=government" is not a standard using. 
For this there exists building=public and building=civic

It is also useful to split spatially separated entries into different changesets.
NavigareAude (2022-07-06 20:54:29+00:00): Hi! 
My contributions are made by answering questions posed in the Android StreetComplete app. I cannot, therefore, influence what this app makes of the input I give.