piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
nmombo12 (2022-01-13 19:44:46+00:00): I didn't see this changeset until I had already commented on your other changesets. So this may be a little repetitive.

Welcome and thanks for your contribution!

I have reviewed this changeset and it looks good. My only suggestion is that instead of a unit conversion from ft to m for width check out this link for how to use feet and inches.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116114551
jpennycook (2022-01-13 22:16:44+00:00): Hi!

There's no need to add bicycle=no, horse=no, and motor_vehicle=no to a footway - highway=footway already implies those values: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#United_Kingdom

Jon
EdLoach (2022-01-14 17:24:04+00:00): The network tag really isn't appropriate for the disjointed set of bus services we have locally. operator is much more suitable.
NiLaKol (2022-01-13 22:50:05+00:00): Hi, why did you change the tag to foot=yes here?
Jorisbo (2022-01-14 07:28:35+00:00): Hi, thank you for the tip, changed it to use the available parallel footway. lkind regards, Joris
SomeoneElse (2022-01-13 18:27:31+00:00): Hello,
Whereabouts did you notice the odd border?
Was it near https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/20987795 , which for some reason is part of a coastline way?
Best Regards,
Andy
zstadler (2025-06-21 09:17:41+00:00): Hello InfosReseaux

Thank you for your contributions to OSM.

This edit changed the "usage" tag of way 544376704
https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/544376704

It was changed from "usage=headrace" to "usage=transmission".

If I understand the other tags correctly, this canal is used for hydroelectric power generation, and usage=headrace seems more appropriate.

See the "usage" table at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway=canal?uselang=en#Tags_used_in_combination

Bonjour InfosReseaux,

Merci pour vos contributions à OSM.

Cette modification a changé la clé "usage" du chemin 544376704 :
https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/544376704

Elle a été modifiée de "usage=headrace" à "usage=transmission".

Si je comprends bien les autres clés, ce canal est utilisé pour la production d’hydroélectricité, et "usage=headrace" semble plus approprié.

Voir le tableau "Destination" à la page suivante :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:waterway%3Dcanal#Destination
ainsi que le schéma à la ligne suivante :
https://www.mdpi.com/energies/energies-11-02994/article_deploy/html/images/energies-11-02994-g001.png
InfosReseaux (2025-06-21 10:50:09+00:00): Hello

That's right usage=headrace covers waterways intended for power generation. It is used on waterway sections between intake and penstocks ending to turbines.

Here there is no turbine. This underground waterway was dug to move water between two valleys and ends in a river downstream.
Even this one is also transmission because it collects water toward a lake:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544376736

The headrace actually begins after the lake:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230500377

So the change was right

Best regards
zstadler (2025-06-21 11:46:36+00:00): Thank you for the clarification. Interesting!
eggie (2022-01-14 06:54:27+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
tux67 (2022-01-14 07:50:56+00:00): Also den Block kann man ja auf dem Luftbild sehen, aber nach dem Edit haben wir jetzt einen Parkplatz ohne Zufahrt. Ist das wirklichd der Fall? Oder ist die Zufahrt über die Sternstraße? Dann wäre es gut die auch einzuzeichnen.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116116198
tux67 (2022-01-14 09:01:20+00:00): Entschuldige, ich nehme alles zurück .. die Zufahrt von der Sternstraße war gemappt, aber in dem Kontoll Changeset das ich geladen hatte nicht mit runtergeladen worden.
Alles ok.
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116116198
eggie (2022-01-14 08:45:58+00:00): Trucje.. Gebruik de linker alttoets tijdens intekenen om plakken van je pad aan de landuse te voorkomen.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116116345
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-01-14 08:41:23+00:00): Alle begin is moeilijk. Zeker water en landuse. 
Je watervlak heb je vastgeknoopt aan de landuse=residential van surhuisterveen.  Daarom omvatten je edits  zo'n groot gebied. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116116584
Het water heb ik losgemaakt en ingebed in de landuse.
Eigenlijk hoort water netjes in de landuse te liggen. Niet er op. 
gr eggie
Tomas Straupis (2022-01-13 18:53:41+00:00): Šitoje vietoje optikos pasaulis tiesiog gatvėje ar kioskelyje? :-)
eggie (2022-01-14 08:28:04+00:00): Dag MapMan, 

Geen bord fietspad dan ook geen fietspaden maken.
Dus highway=path
foot=yes
bicycle=yes
surface=paving_stones

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-14 08:30:49+00:00): Aangepast... Mochten er borden fietspad G11, 13 of 12a zijn gekomen laat het weten. Dan draai ik m'n edits terug. 
Gr eggie
Yunkers (2022-01-26 13:15:24+00:00): Hej. 
Numery dróg były już dodane jako unsigned_ref. Czy są w terenie jakieś tabliczki z numerami?
Staraj się też lepiej opisywać zmiany. Opis "droga" niewiele mówi, powinno być w tym przypadku "dodanie numeru drogi".
eggie (2022-01-14 08:13:10+00:00): Beste MapMan  
Op een fietspad geldt geen maxspeed van 30 km/h
Ook hoef je niet bicycle=designated toe te voegen. Het is immers een fietspad.
Hier de afgesproken tagging van fietspaden. 
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

Maar iets is pad een fietspad als er een G11, 13, 12a bord staat. Dat is hier niet het geval.. Dan taggen we zoiets met highway=path surface=? 
Dan wel bicycle=yes foot=yes voor de duidelijkheid. 
Ik pas wat aan. Mocht er daadwerkelijk een bord fietspad zijn gekomen.. laat het dan even weten.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-14 08:24:17+00:00): Het kleine stukje fietspad Jan Binneslaan heb ik wel op oneway=no gezet..Dit om te voorkomen dat iemand oneway=yes gaat taggen. .  Je mag vanuit de Schakel linksaf het fietspad op. 
De hoofdrijbaan heb ik de tag 
bicycle:backward=use_sidepath gegeven. 
Gr eggie
NiLaKol (2022-01-14 22:13:02+00:00): Hi, whats your source for this change? In the Database are a few Ways with explicit mapped traffic_sign combinations of 250;259 and 1026-37.
eggie (2022-01-14 08:07:17+00:00): Dag Mapman  Je hoeft niet aan wegen oneway=no toe te voegen. Dat is default.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-14 06:55:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-01-14 06:58:27+00:00): Feedback Tip.. Maak geen combinaties met foot=yes en access=no (Verboden toegang)  
Ik heb die laatste tag verwijderd.
MVG
eggie
nitro_expander (2022-01-14 01:53:42+00:00): its already mapped 🤦🏽‍♂️
skyper (2023-01-26 20:48:11+00:00): Hallo Uwe,
Du schreibst Mobilfunkmast (man_made=mast) trägst aber ein Fernmeldeturm (man_made=communications_tower) ein, siehe auch https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22677. Kannst Du das bitte ändern.

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
uwe-shwbl (2023-01-27 12:11:35+00:00): Erledigt, danke für den Hinweis. Da muss ich gleich mal prüfen, ob ich noch andere Mobilfunkmasten falsch eingetragen habe.
user_2066394 (2022-01-13 22:57:04+00:00): War historisch für Fußgänger freigegeben, gibt es dort eine Beschilderung?
Bäckergasse (2022-01-14 09:06:00+00:00): war nicht freigegeben, keine Beschilderung, daß das ein Weg ist
Kai Johnson (2023-10-25 14:06:27+00:00): Hi! It looks like a while ago you made several changesets that have islands with natural=coastline;bare_rock. The islands in these changesets (e.g., way/38596843) aren't rendering right now because they have semicolons in the natural=* value along with "coastline". The natural=coastline tag is special and can't have semicolons in it. You might make a separate congruent way with natural=bare_rock to get everything to render.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-01-14 13:50:48+00:00): Aqui você chegou a mapear vias sobre um campo de futebol, voce  esta piorando o mapa. por favor, não faça mais esse tipo de edição.
ServidalBEBERIBE (2022-01-14 17:37:57+00:00): Boa Tarde nobre colega, sou da região e posso lhe garantir que não fiz nada de errado aqui nessa situação. Pelo contrário, "tirei um prolongamento da Rua Maria Neres que existia. O que tem de via passando pelo campo ja havia sido traçado por outra pessoa.
ServidalBEBERIBE (2022-01-14 17:41:33+00:00): So um detalhe, sou Funcionario Publico em exercicio na Prefeitura Municipal de Beberibe_CE e morador nativo na região. Tudo que eu fizer aqui nesse mapa vai esta de acordo com a planta do loteamento ou com um decreto Legislativo.
ServidalBEBERIBE (2022-01-14 18:38:55+00:00): Só agora fiquei sabendo que o mapa destinasse a mostrar a situação real no solo. Não farei mais alterações neste. Obrigado pelo esclarecimento, Boa tarde.
eggie (2022-01-14 07:03:43+00:00): Dag Josefine... Het is onduidelijk wat je hebt gedaan..behalve een aantal polygonen opgesplitst? Je edits..
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116119235

Deze changeset zal ik even terugdraaien. Wat was je bedoeling?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-14 07:04:20+00:00): reverted by changeset #116134974
Konkon153 (2022-01-13 19:15:02+00:00): [ und damit alle Adressen in der Gemeinde Sukow vollständig angepasst ]
nmombo12 (2022-01-13 19:41:50+00:00): Is the width with four decimal places the result of a unit conversion? I believe you can use an apostrophe to use feet and inches. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116120262
SouthfieldGIS (2022-01-13 19:55:20+00:00): Thanks, I think I figured out where I went wrong. If you edit in iD and enter the apostrophe into the text box, it removes the apostrophe. That prompted me to convert to meters. However, I just found if I manually edit the tags, the apostrophe will not get removed.
nmombo12 (2022-01-13 19:39:48+00:00): Welcome and thanks for your contribution!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-01-13 20:15:25+00:00): Proszę, przestań masowych zmian klasyfikacji dróg bez konsultacji. Spora część jest całkowicie nietrafiona.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-01-13 20:15:47+00:00): Zapraszam na https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 - możesz tam wątek założyć
maraf24 (2022-01-14 08:53:12+00:00): @Krzysiu Jarzyna:"Podobnie jak w tym miejscu, w drugą stronę: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/50.6387"

To nie jest prawidłowe, więc należałoby się zastanowić, jak to rozwiązać, a nie kopiować złe oznaczenia w inne miejsca.
DeBigC (2022-06-05 20:25:27+00:00): Really useful to have these interpolations scattered around. It will be a good basis for a ground survey
VictorIE (2022-06-06 05:28:26+00:00): I'm sure they were based on your Mappillary!
DeBigC (2022-06-06 14:56:01+00:00): Whatever way you get them keep em coming, the Mapillary here was patchy.
literan (2022-01-14 16:04:20+00:00): wrong edit
https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CCUyjYFP-D
https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CCUyjYFfoB

please stop make fake edits.
MtnManMan (2022-01-14 23:26:17+00:00): Hi literan, thanks for reaching out. I believe Yandex Panoramas confirm this highway is oneway starts at the east end (https://yandex.com/maps/-/CCUyjJXCTC) and terminates at the west end (https://yandex.com/maps/-/CCUyjJdIXC). There is also a "do not enter" sign facing west along the highway (https://yandex.com/maps/-/CCUyjJdJSB). With further investigation, I think that the ground level imagery you suggested is for 8-й проезд Марьиной Рощи (way 51476395), which is just south of where I edited.
literan (2022-01-15 09:20:13+00:00): Oh, my fault :-( I've mixed up two streets.

I'm sorry
MtnManMan (2022-01-19 01:18:47+00:00): literan, thank you for the response. I will go ahead and add the necessary oneway tag to 9-й проезд Марьиной Рощи (way 30037216).
Krzysiu Jarzyna (2022-01-13 21:42:04+00:00): Wiki mówi o drodze kategorii secondary jako łączniku dróg wyższej kategorii (A highway which is not part of a major route, but nevertheless forming a link in the national route network), więc o jakiej niespójności tu mówisz? Dlaczego na siłę ma być to primary skoro w polskim systemie nie jest to droga najwyższej kategorii?

Dlaczego pozbawiasz kierowców korzystających z mapy, istotnej informacji o zmniejszonej klasyfikacji tego odcinka drogi po przekroczeniu granicy? Co jeśli droga nie spełnia odpowiednich parametrów i naraża na nieprzejezdność pojazdy o innej kubaturze niż zwykła osobówka?

I co np. z takimi miejscami jak niespójne drogi graniczne: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/50.6374/16.2224 ?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-01-13 23:15:05+00:00): >  Co jeśli droga nie spełnia odpowiednich parametrów i naraża na nieprzejezdność pojazdy o innej kubaturze niż zwykła osobówka?

Są na to tagi maxweight i inne.

highway=primary może mieć ograniczenia wagowe

> I co np. z takimi miejscami jak niespójne drogi graniczne: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/50.6374/16.2224 ?

OSM ma sporo błędów, mam wlasne narzędzia raportujące dziesiątki tysięcy błędów.

A tym miejscu? Chyba highway=primary po stronie polskiej jest wadliwe. Przynajmniej moim zdaniem.

> Dlaczego na siłę ma być to primary skoro w polskim systemie nie jest to droga najwyższej kategorii?

Bo highway=primary to nie są drogi najwyższej kategorii? Jest jeszcze highway=trunk =motorway

> więc o jakiej niespójności tu mówisz

Jak klasa drogi się na granicy zmienia lub w polu - bez istotnego skrzyżowania - to jest to błąd.
Krzysiu Jarzyna (2022-01-14 07:54:21+00:00): 1. Ale już do priorytetu odśnieżania nie ma tagu i stąd w Polsce wyznaczono kategorie dróg, których powinniśmy się trzymać. Nie ślepo, ale też nie na siłę podnosić kategorie gdzie Ci pasuje. 

Cały czas mówisz o niespójności, a połączyłeś granicę Państwa z małą miejscowością w której urywasz ślad swojej drogi primary tylko dlatego, że napotkałeś skrzyżowanie i prowadzisz dalszy odcinek trasy DW395 jako secondary. To jest według Ciebie spójność, by samodzielnie na czuja wybrane fragmenty drogi danej kategorii podnosić o kategorię między skrzyżowaniami?
user_4493657 (2022-01-14 11:39:29+00:00): "1. Ale już do priorytetu odśnieżania nie ma tagu"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:winter_service:priority
they (2022-01-13 20:17:14+00:00): This was discussed in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115451427#map=11/34.5126/-112.3475
Luzandro (2023-04-29 11:15:28+00:00): Hallo,

"UG. [Ennsbach]" ist kein Name, sondern steht nur für ein Unbenanntes Gerinne, welches in den Ennsbach mündet, daher habe ich name wieder entfernt - siehe auch https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/unbenannte-gerinne/98249/21
Camello_AR (2022-01-24 15:27:33+00:00): Hola. Te pido que cuando hagas Conjuntos masivos de cambios, los titules correctamente para determinar que estuviste modificando. Y revises que los cambios no destruyan datos consolidados (como la relación barrio san ceferino)
user_12328418 (2022-01-19 09:36:30+00:00): Bitte beahten:
Wenn ein Hauseingang mit kompletter Adresse vorhanden ist, diesen nicht am Gebäude "doppeln", auch wenn SC das sagt - was ein Fehler bei SC ist.
28, 30 32 in der Karl-Marx-Str. korrigiert. Eventuell andere Gebäude überarbeiten?
Gebäudeteile _> building:part=*
Gesamtes Gebäude -> building=* als extra way. (Relationen mit zwei outer sind schwerer bearbeitbar - mach iD aber gern - statt auf building:part zu verweisen.)
Gruß aus Freital von geri-oc.
Bei Fragen / Hilfe gern eine PN
eggie (2022-01-14 07:47:30+00:00): De weg heb ik weer even losgemaakt van de landuse. Probeer plakken te voorkomen.
MVG
eggie
Je edits

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116123294
mlvandijke (2022-01-14 20:11:27+00:00): Beste Eggie,
Dankjewel voor je input en correctie.
Mvg, Martin.
kartler175 (2022-01-14 09:46:21+00:00): Und jetzt berühren sich die beiden outer-Ringe wieder in 2 Punkten, was  das eigentliche Problem ist, weil das nach OGC-Standard bei Polygonen nich erlaubt ist.

Siehe dazu note in way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193871746 und Kommntare zu  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105621654
user_177389 (2022-01-14 11:52:20+00:00): Ja, das trifft genauso auf extra eingezeichnete geschlossene Ringe zu, die separat "über Kreuz" zugeordnet werden.

Der Mist kam ungetestet mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105561661 - also Jahre nachdem Wambacher es auf den OGC-Standard gebracht hatte.

JOSM meckert übrigens nicht, nach OSM-Standard scheint es so wie jetzt gültig zu sein. Dies beschreibt auch das Wiki, allerdings eher für innere Ringe. Die hiesige Situation ist wohl ganz selten anzutreffen.

Sollte es weiter Probleme geben, wäre die wohl einzige Lösung, geschlossene Ringe mit minimalem Abstand zur Mittellinie zu erzeugen, so wie es Wambacher damals gemacht hat.

Beste Grüße
Mario
kartler175 (2022-01-14 16:30:44+00:00): Die Übernahme in die Datenbank funktioniert ja jetzt momentan mit Version 27 und einer aktuelleren osm2pgsql Version. Ich befürchte nur, dass sich das möglicherweise schon ändert, wenn sich die Sortierung der member in in der Relation ändert. Dann lassen sich u.U. die beiden outer-Ringe nicht mehr eindeutig rekonstruieren, sondern es ergibt sich ein einzelner, sich selbst überschneidender Ringe.
Das ließe sich zuverlässig verhindern, wenn einer von beiden schon als einzelner komplett geschlossener way angelegt ist.
Ewen Hill (2022-01-17 01:54:02+00:00): Hi Teek, You added a surface of "wood" to the Base walk south path. Looking at Mapillary, I see this as unpaved https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27444540 - Let us know if you know more but there are no trees here and a wooden platform of this length would be a costly exercise.
user_5359 (2022-01-15 07:42:29+00:00): Hello! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/61002910/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
eggie (2022-01-14 07:49:23+00:00): Dag Anna... 
Graag concreet commentaar bij je edits. Updates zegt andere mappers helemaal niets.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-01-14 08:04:16+00:00): access=destination kan onmogelijk goed zijn hier. Dat geldt voor iedereen. Beter niet algemeen straten op slot zetten op die manier.
Ik heb die tag verwijderd. 
vehicle=destination zou natuurlijk goed kunnen. 

MVG
eggie
Glassman (2022-01-14 00:30:51+00:00): Since the driveway is visible someone is likely to just add it back. I'd suggest adding it back in with access=private to keep routers from using it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116124652
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-01-13 21:43:17+00:00): Please, try to split edits when editing in far away places. There is no good reason for this edit to contain entire Poland.
literan (2022-01-14 16:01:21+00:00): wrong edit https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CCUyjYBboA
MtnManMan (2022-01-14 23:25:19+00:00): Hi literan, thank you for your comment. I see what you mean here, you are correct, this is not a oneway. Thanks for letting me know and updating it.
MxxCon (2022-01-14 07:43:23+00:00): Hello.
Could you please elaborate what kind of road segment is this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116124945
mdejean (2022-01-14 15:05:56+00:00): Non-public parking garage.

https://www.westsiderag.com/2020/02/26/famed-garage-where-robert-caro-cracked-the-robert-moses-code-now-gated-off
PinkBoiRawMeatClub (2022-01-14 00:22:08+00:00): I love Your big curve
Dino Michelini (2022-01-14 10:08:15+00:00): Ciao, con il tag landuse=forest (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest) andrebbero mappati SOLO i boschi utilizzati per la selvicoltura (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selvicoltura), ovvero, quei boschi che sono utilizzati per la produzione di legname e che sono tagliati con turno decennale o superiore. Essendo questi boschi molto piccoli l'utile economico derivante dal taglio non coprirebbe nemmeno i costi necessari, quindi, mi sembra strano che siano mappati come forest e in tale caso andrebbe utilizzato natural=wood. Ti invito di verificare se i boschi mappati sono effettivamente boschi per selvicoltura o in caso contrario correggere il tag da landuse a natural. Gradita una risposta. Grazie
semrs1 (2022-01-16 16:40:42+00:00): Ciao, sulla pagina wiki c'è scritto che natural=wood e landuse= forest  sono generalmente sinonimi, ma se qui si trattano in maniera diversa cambierò il tag
Dino Michelini (2022-01-14 10:11:26+00:00): Ciao, con il tag landuse=forest (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Forest) andrebbero mappati SOLO i boschi utilizzati per la selvicoltura (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selvicoltura), ovvero, quei boschi che sono utilizzati per la produzione di legname e che sono tagliati con turno decennale o superiore. Essendo questi boschi molto piccoli l'utile economico derivante dal taglio non coprirebbe nemmeno i costi necessari, quindi, mi sembra strano che siano mappati come forest e in tale caso andrebbe utilizzato natural=wood. Ti invito di verificare se i boschi mappati sono effettivamente boschi per selvicoltura o in caso contrario correggere il tag da landuse a natural. Gradita una risposta. Grazie
gscholz (2022-01-29 07:01:29+00:00): Hi yourprince,
this changeset has destroyed several boundary relations, like "Monción", "San Ignacio De Sabaneta", "Santiago" and so on:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-71.22277&lat=19.49403&zoom=10&opacity=0.43

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=116125809

I have fixed this meanwhile by reverting the biggest part of this changeset. Please watch out what you are doing.
Kind Regards
Guido
eggie (2025-04-12 19:23:09+00:00): Hoi Martin,

Kun jij nog eens kijken gezien de opmerking.
Volgens mij is er alleen een vrachtwagenverbod over 500 m vanaf het noorden.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4705303#map=14/51.76181/5.21979&layers=N

en

https://smoothefiets.ddns.net/html/verkeersbordenkaart/index.php?lat=51.756612368&lng=5.208598852&z=18

MVG
eggie
emvee (2025-04-13 07:18:43+00:00): Tuurlijk, even wat rondgekeken (S&P is van maart 2025) en de dingen bijgewerkt, zie note.
eggie (2025-04-13 07:42:30+00:00): 👍
mueschel (2022-01-19 09:38:32+00:00): Hi,
please check the stairs you added - they got a strange ramy=gate tag.
JAAS (2022-01-20 16:22:17+00:00): Thank you for the heads-up mueschel! That was  a pretty bad typo, I meant to write it in as `ramp=yes` but somehow did not. Already fixed!
user_4493657 (2022-01-14 00:12:59+00:00): https://miedzyrzecz.naszemiasto.pl/przy-autostradzie-a2-stanely-defibrylatory-ratujace-zycie/ar/c4-8626357
GinaroZ (2022-01-14 12:15:38+00:00): Thanks for updating the map. There's a couple of notes in the area to be resolve if you are able to survey them: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2647663
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2566640
yamanq (2022-01-19 02:48:36+00:00): Looks great, thanks for adding these paths. One small thing that I would suggest is changing surface=ground on this path (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1020980561) to something more specific, like surface=dirt. See this wiki page for details: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface
NorthCrab (2023-03-21 23:17:26+00:00): What's the reasoning behind such changes? This does not seem right or at least is redundant.
ortho_is_hot (2022-07-28 04:15:46+00:00): Hi Stephen, am wondering whether you know if the Cornwallis Road closure is completed (its been 7 months since the changeset?) Cheers
Stephen Males (2022-07-28 06:18:10+00:00): According to - https://www.hawkesbury.nsw.gov.au/emergency/flood-emergency/flood-project-updates - they are still designing the drain. So I'd say a number of months yet.