piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2020-09-17 16:36:34+00:00): The sidewalk along Wolcott Ave was connect to the footway that extends from South Rose St, and went through a building. I don't know if that was inadvertent but I corrected it. 

Also - you added four different mama Sambuca Kitchens to what looks like two different buildings. Are they all the same restaurant but just in different buildings? If that is true, I recommend combining them using a relation. The small building added next to 8300 Walbash looks like its just an extension of the original building. If so, I'd would just extend the original building to include the new section. 

If you need help - let me know

I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91047743
Glassman (2020-09-17 16:27:34+00:00): Are both buildings part of the same restaurant?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91048359
dieterdreist (2023-10-03 10:06:15+00:00): Ciao Antanicus, ho notato che hai inserito questo punto con nome "Nasone", ma non capisco il tag "stand pipe", è una fontanella del tipo nasone? Suggerisco di usare il tag amenity=drinking_water insieme al tag fountain=nasone in questo caso.
Saluti,
Martin
Antanicus (2023-10-11 07:24:08+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la segnalazione. Penso sia stata una decisione autonoma di Osmand, forse gli sviluppatori hanno deciso che un oggetto fontanella andava segnato come "stand pipe". Correggo il nodo :)
dieterdreist (2023-10-11 07:56:30+00:00): ottimo, grazie!
ma-rt-in (2020-09-19 10:04:18+00:00): Hallo,
aufgrund dieser langen Zeit der SPerrung des Weges sollte man doch lieber highway=construction anwenden.
Ist der Abschnitt eigentlich vollgesperrt oder darf Rad/Fuß noch da durch?
vg
gungott (2020-09-19 11:50:42+00:00): Fuß und Rad geht, gibt bestimmt eine elegantete Lösung ich wusste leider nicht wie ich das sonst machen kann , die Sperrung befindet sich unterhalb der Brücke
ma-rt-in (2020-09-19 11:57:46+00:00): Also ist nur die Straße dirket unter der Brücke gesperrt oder der Abschnitt zwischen Gaustraße und der Unterführung?
gungott (2020-09-19 20:44:11+00:00): Ja quasi vor der Brücke von süden aus gesehen.,
Warscheinlich modernisiert der HVV seine Brücke .
gungott (2020-09-19 20:46:41+00:00): Eigentlich müsste da wo die Bahrenfelder Strasse vor der Brücke den Knick macht einfach eine Sperrung rein , vielleicht kannst du das ja machen , mir ist das nicht gelungen, so ist halt immernoch besser als ungesperrt.
Vinber-Pro (2020-09-17 15:39:36+00:00): Salut Laurent,
Alors, on continue à éditer les restaurants :)
Bon TOC !
Petite question, il semble ne pas y avoir de bâtiment pour ce fast-food ?
Laurent Goubert (2020-09-18 07:35:47+00:00): Salut Vincent, 
Effectivement, c'est une cabane de plage qui est démontée d'octobre à juin.... est ce que je la matérialise quand même ?
merci bien
laurent
user_5359 (2020-09-17 16:52:10+00:00): Hello! Please use building=yes instead BUILDING=YES.
jaap de vries (2020-10-09 07:58:58+00:00): In dit grote bewerkingsgebied zie ik enkele vlakken met adres gegevens. Het is de bedoeling dat de adres gegevens als los punt in de gebouwen komen te staan en niet in de landuse. Pas je het zelf even aan of wil je hulp? Ook graag oppassen met grote bewerkingsgebieden, deze graag klein houden en voorzien van duidelijke opmerkingen.
DaxServer (2021-01-23 09:47:37+00:00): Hello Nurul.
The railway level crossing road https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/848455847 does not exist. It is simply a path that people use to cross the railway tracks. I'll be deleting this.
Thanks
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91050541
DaxServer (2021-01-23 09:59:57+00:00): This has been corrected in https://osmcha.org/changesets/98012333/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91050541
DaxServer (2021-01-23 10:08:38+00:00): This has been corrected here https://osmcha.org/changesets/98012333/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91050541
VLD257 (2021-01-26 17:50:42+00:00): Hi Srihari,
Thanks for correcting the data.
Regards,
Nurul
dval (2021-07-07 16:59:45+00:00): Hi, User5! Вы (ваша команда) то добавляете ford на хайвее от берега до берега, то сейчас удаляете их. Второе излишне, поскольку предусмотрено Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dyes
eggie (2020-09-17 14:16:00+00:00): Dag Jannes.. mooie aanvulling, maar schuiven met de kaart met editor iD in editmodus  levert nogal eens schade op. Beter niet doen.
Het gebied van je edits is veel te groot. 
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=91051403

MVG,
Eggie
Jannes Cruiming (2020-09-17 14:51:48+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Daar was ik me van bewust het pannen van de kaart in de editor. Ik heb goed gekeken naar de wijzingsset en zag alleen aanpassingen aan watertappunten.

Welke editor zou je aanbevelen?

Groet, Jannes
eggie (2020-09-17 14:57:31+00:00): Vrijwel alle ervaren mappers gebruiken JOSM.... een aanrader. 
Veel meer overzicht en mogelijkheden.
Plugins, validator, mer achtergronden. 
Je schuift daar met de rechtermuisknop en kan dus na selectie per abuis dus niets verschuiven.. want dat is wat er vaak gebeurt.
We moet je met josm weer opletten dat je niet een node heb geselecteerd bij afsluiten. 
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       
Succes,
Eggie
canfe (2026-05-10 10:10:06+00:00): A me sembra che certe ciclabili mica esistano. Non son segnate nè con segnaletica orizzontale e nemmeno verticale.
Tipo questa: way 1190007292
PS: ti ho scritto tre messaggi con questo, ma non hai mai risposto
ma-rt-in (2020-09-19 10:10:55+00:00): Hallo,
da du ja scheinbar ortskundig bist, würdest du noch ein paar Details zur Haltestelle ergänzen?!
vg
eggie (2020-09-17 14:45:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution. I merged the info with the present addressnode.
Eggie
Владимир К (2021-05-30 18:32:31+00:00): если здание снесли, но еще на снимке, принято добавлять was:building=yes, а не building=no
dcapillae (2020-09-17 14:00:00+00:00): Este conjunto de cambios debió haberse subido con la cuenta de usuario dcapillae_buildings-import (error mío).
Carto'Cité (2020-11-03 14:28:24+00:00): Hello.
You changed this cycleway (https://www.osm.org/way/664105331) to a footway, however the changeset comment mentions parking nodes so I wonder whether this was intentional and whether you used the aerial imagery or surveyed the area.
Can you please clarify.
Antoine from Carto'Cité, project #CartoVeloIDF
vogelfreier (2020-11-03 16:31:50+00:00): Hi, even though I was only supposed to take care of parking spaces in the project at maproulette.org, I was a bit digressed.
Because these constant terms cycelway are a bit nasty to me, especially since this line passes very close to the houses and sometimes collides with them.
If it was to be a pure cycelway directly along the houses, as it was inside, where would the pedestrians walk along? ….
Have a look at the Nop for the riding and hiking map https://www.wanderreitkarte.de/ ,for the evaluation ...
Greeting Rüdiger

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Carto'Cité (2021-03-02 12:07:06+00:00): Hi
This is a true cycleway, you can trust the first contributor :)
If you want to be sure (and yes not to contribute) you can check this https://www.google.com/maps/@48.9747968,2.2502636,3a,75y,277.31h,72.12t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sn-xZpoLUThoBy52I6gMmPg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
best regards
Charles from Carto'Cité, project #CartoVeloIDF
bernardo60 (2021-04-19 14:05:08+00:00): Hi - I looked at the footpaths today and believe they should not be added to the map. They only provide access to the rice fields - after next harvest, they might disappear. They are not used by the wider public, hardly visible, yes you can walk there but that does not make it a footpath. The maps become very loaded if users start to add their personal cross country routes.The name given "Jalan Kaki" is misleading, they don't have a name, Jalan Kaki means footpath in Indonesian.
ottwiz (2020-09-17 14:20:23+00:00): and added some natural areas
Cascafico (2020-09-18 07:30:42+00:00): Non so se avevi intenzione di correggere il tag da CaiScale a cai_scale. Se hai intenzione di metterlo sulla relazione, dovrebbe riflettere quello del tratto più impegnativo; se invece conosci lo stato di alcuni tratti di sentiero, sarebbe un'informazione preziosa da assegnare alle relative way, spezzandole se necessario.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91053795
micheleOSM3 (2020-09-18 16:41:56+00:00): In realtà poi mi sono accorto che la scala E che avevo aggiunta in realtà è solo una mia supposizione in quanto non ho trovato conferma nè nei cartelli nè nel sito CAI. Pertanto ho rimesso come era prima, ovvero senza cai_scale.
DaxServer (2021-01-23 09:48:07+00:00): Hi. Why is the road going over the railway tracks? I'll be reverting this. Thanks!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91054285
DaxServer (2021-01-23 09:59:35+00:00): This has been corrected in https://osmcha.org/changesets/98012333/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91054285
DaxServer (2021-01-23 10:07:59+00:00): This has been corrected here https://osmcha.org/changesets/98012333
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91054285
VLD257 (2021-01-26 17:51:53+00:00): Hi Srihari,
Thanks for the corrections done. 
Regards,
Nurul
Cebderby (2020-09-17 15:02:05+00:00): In this changeset, the imagery used is labelled as "Esri World Imagery;Bing Streetside;Mapillary Images;Mapillary Map Features;Mapillary Signs;OpenStreetCam Images;Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta;Mapbox Satellite", yet you have added 2 ways with source=maxar, and positioned then aligned with unaligned Esri imagery which is clearly way out.
Do you have the slightest control over what you are doing?
tnayini (2020-09-18 02:49:20+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i was confused with the geometry alignment of multiple imagery and mistakenly created a misalignment with the esri world imagery. please find the changeset( 91077197 ) for the suggested modifications.going forward , i will make sure to check the alignment of entire vicinity before making the edits . i have observed that the osm is auto-populating all the toggled imagery as imagery used, please suggest the corrective action for this if i am wrong. i will make sure to update the source column according to the edits made..once again,thanks for your valuable feedback. always happy to learn from the community"
marc__marc (2021-02-24 08:35:12+00:00): Bonjour,
comme vous l'a rappelé l'éditeur, nous n'avons malheureusement pas le droit de copier les données de GoogleMaps.
la solution dans ce cas est d'aller sur le site de l'établissement pour récupérer directement les données sans copier celle de Google. c'est important pour respecter le droit que possède Google sur sa base de donnée.
je viens de procéder à cet ajout.
Cordialement,
Marc
fgouget (2020-09-20 22:22:08+00:00): Serait-il possible d'internationaliser le numéro de téléphone lors de la création de ces points ?
Donc ici il faudrait remplacer "phone=03 21 55 70 91" par "phone=+33 3 21 55 70 91"

J'ai aussi rencontré quelques cas de noms de ville tout en majuscule dans addr:city ce qui déclenche une erreur Osmose. Mais heureusement ces cas sont assez rares (addr:city est inutile en fait et la solution la plus simple serait d'enlever ce champ).
Slorus (2020-09-17 15:01:19+00:00): Euro repar is overigens geen typo.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 04:14:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91055782
Cebderby (2020-09-17 15:05:47+00:00): Again, imagery used labelled as "Esri World Imagery;Bing Streetside;Mapillary Images;Mapillary Map Features;Mapillary Signs;OpenStreetCam Images",
but service way added with source=maxar
and grossly misaligned as using unaligned Esri imagery.
Is there any reason why all of your changesets should not be reverted?
tnayini (2020-09-18 03:00:24+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i sticked to the image quality ignoring the geometry. it is a honest mistake from our end. please find the changeset( 91077412 )  for the suggested modifications. Going forward, i will make the geometry of the entire vicinity as a priority before creating the new roads  and update the source columns properly. i am using all the available osm imagery before making the edits. i have observed that the osm is auto-populating all the toggled imagery as imagery used irrespective of the actual imagery, please suggest the corrective action for this if i am wrong. once again, i am grateful for your valuable feedback. i will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to implement this in my future edits.please suggest me in case of any more modifications. always happy to learn from the community
Cebderby (2020-09-18 08:52:01+00:00): Please take care to notice if all the roads and buildings all appear to be off by the same amount in the same direction, then it is likely the imagery that is off, not the OSM features.  As an example, please note that even the nice new Bing imagery is quite poorly aligned around here, eg look at the roundabout and buildings at the north end of this changeset.  If in doubt, a quick look at the OS_OpenData_StreetView layer if mapping in the UK is useful - if you see good alignment of OSM ways/buildings with that, then move imagery to match these features not the other way around.
Soshal Distan Singh (2021-11-06 18:32:18+00:00): >Ночевка6
>Ночевка5
>Ночевка3
>Ночевка4
>Ночевка3
>Ночевка1
>Наша машина

Вы используете публичные карты openstreetmap.org для нанесения личных меток. Не надо так.
marc__marc (2021-03-31 20:21:57+00:00): Bonjour,
c'est 3 noeuds building avec name=* représente-t-il le nom du batiment déjà présent dans osm ? ou cela représente autre chose ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Binnette (2021-07-30 15:22:19+00:00): Hello, je n'ai pas ajouté de name=* (à ma connaissance). Donc soit dois être de l'existant OSM.
Robert46798 (2020-09-29 19:58:25+00:00): Hallo osmapper__,

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Danke für deine Ergänzungen!

Ich habe mir diesen und den zweiten Änderungssatz angeschaut, weil du beim hochladen die entsprechende Option ausgewählt hast.

So weit ich das sehe, ist alles in Ordnung. Eine allgemeine Anmerkung habe ich aber noch. Beim hochladen der Änderungen gibt es auch die Möglichkeit eine Quelle anzugeben. Hier wäre schön wenn du etwas einträgst. Wenn du Dinge selbst vor Ort gesehen hast reicht besipsielsweise ein "survey", also frei überstezt "beobachtet". Du kannst aber jeden beliebigen Text eintragen der anderen Mappern hilft, deine Änderungen nachzuvollziehen.
Das ist vor allem zur Klärung des Urheberrechts wichtig. Viele Quellen dürfen nicht für OSM verwendet werden. Wenn bei Quelle aber eine "legale" Quelle steht, oder ersichtlich ist, dass du die Dinge selbst gesehen hast, bleiben keine Fragen offen.

Viel Spaß beim Weitermappen,
Robert
Vinber (2020-09-26 16:32:46+00:00): Bonjour,
sur cette zone https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/848505112/history il me semble que landuse=industrial est plus adapté que building=industrial, cela vous convient ?
Bonne journée
VoyOptimist (2020-09-28 08:07:05+00:00): Bonjour,
C'est + adapté, merci !
Tomas_J (2022-02-19 09:55:14+00:00): fyi - the bus station |Arriva Hlohovec node replaced by landuse=depot, depot=bus; toto nie je autobusova stanica ale iba depo pre autobusy arrivy, nie je tu mozne nastupit na autobus ani tu nezacinaju autobusove linky
Patr1k_P (2022-02-19 10:18:54+00:00): no vidis riesil som tvoju poznamku, ale zle som to oznacil

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/825167
Tomas_J (2022-02-19 10:47:00+00:00): Aha, to bola moja poznámka ? :) Vtipné. Už by som to teraz priamo opravil, v čase písania pozvánky som asi nevedel ešte ako.
Sanderd17 (2020-12-13 14:49:04+00:00): Dag Scottdevos, op deze weg had je access=no gezet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313376938

Dit betekend dat er geen toegang is, ook niet voor wandelaars. Ik ben dit vandaag gaan bekijken, en de weg is wel degelijk toegankelijk voor wandelaars, en zelfs een stuk voor fietsers.
Glassman (2020-09-17 16:42:39+00:00): Thanks for removed the buildings.

Tip: we often leave the address points so they can be reused.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91058576
aceman444 (2021-02-15 09:49:39+00:00): Zdravim, naco je dobry ten bod autobusova stanica "Arriva", ked cela stanica uz je zakreslena https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190632480 ?
Patr1k_P (2021-02-18 08:48:20+00:00): zdravim, riesil som tam nejaku poznamku, uz si nepamatam presne, mozno niekto iny pisal ze to tam chyba, ale som si najskor nevsimol ze to tam uz je znacene
mbeyerle (2020-09-21 18:06:05+00:00): Awesome! Thanks for adding these paths to osm
eggie (2020-09-17 16:36:05+00:00): Beste Ijsselsterk.. beter niet access=no taggen op wegen en paaltjes.
Beter nog verwijderen. 
Een bollard heeft al een aantal default tags.
Wel is het nuttige om moped en mofa = yes te taggen omdat motor_vehicle=no ook default is.
Zie wiki.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-09-17 16:37:48+00:00): Wat bedoel je wordt niet meegenomen ?  Voor wie en welke verkeersdeelnemers?
eggie (2020-09-17 16:46:00+00:00): De accesstags aangepast en de bollard wat opgeschoven. Hij staat immers verderop. Als bron gebruik ik de BGT omtrekgericht.
MVG,
Eggie
ElliottPlack (2020-11-25 15:43:30+00:00): Hi there, Welcome to OSM! I see you've marked this little road as private, but switched it to a path and added some extra tags. What is the source of this info?
Miowdnoqwndowiend (2020-11-25 16:32:48+00:00): I live on this road and it is a private, unpaved driveway.
ElliottPlack (2020-11-25 17:32:34+00:00): Understood. I live in the neighborhood too. Out of curiosity, what made you decide to edit the road on OSM?
ElliottPlack (2020-11-25 17:57:40+00:00): Did a little digging here and found the road has been private in OSM for about six years. The surface type is set to gravel, which is more specific than 'unpaved' and that further limits any kind of routing along it. Also interestingly, it is legally named Ruxwood Road, just like the rest of Ruxwood Rd per Baltimore County record plat 52/14 although the county does not sign it. Do you get pass-through traffic along it?
alester (2020-09-17 17:36:48+00:00): This reservoir was created early in the process of the creation of the Glenshire Business Park, so it was fairly modern. I could still see it in some 2019 imagery, but I haven't been by there in a little while. I know there was some more construction happening up in that part of the business park, so it's possible that it wasn't needed anymore and has since been removed so buildings can be built there. This should probably be confirmed by a site visit, though.
tbrownbc (2020-09-17 18:41:12+00:00): you're right, that was a f*ck up. Of the two easily accessed sat images I see, the newer one shows it. Is there a revert/undo button somewhere? IMHO Wierd wierd place for a reservoir.
alester (2020-09-22 04:24:36+00:00): Yeah, I'm not sure what its purpose is. It looks somewhat temporary, but it's been there for a number of years now. I've reverted this changeset, which restores the objects to the way they were.
literan (2020-09-19 13:08:55+00:00): зачем удалили контуры гаражей? сейчас придет новичок и заново их по спутнику отрисует. Там не зря стояли was:building. 

Откачу.
PT-53 (2020-09-18 07:23:25+00:00): Hallo ChrisFromRV,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz
von diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306134018/history
einen von nur 2 Knoten gelöscht, so daß der "Weg" jetzt nur einen Knoten hat. Das ist falsch. Im OSM-Inspector wird deshalb nun ein Hinweis "single_node_in_way" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=9.62020&lat=47.78992&zoom=18&opacity=0.34&overlays=single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Ich halte Deine Überarbeitung der dortigen Kreuzung des weiteren für eine Verschlechterung und habe dies Änderungen daher wieder vollständig zurückgesetzt.

Grüße
PT-53 (2020-09-19 06:03:30+00:00): Siehe auch
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91113635
Akkurator (2021-03-22 23:21:51+00:00): Kuppelnaukreuzung: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101461680
literan (2020-09-19 13:07:35+00:00): А давно там, на дублерах, такие знаки поставили? https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CCQx7BvPSC еще три недели назад их не было.
ldo2 (2020-10-02 08:20:52+00:00): Знак стоит раньше, при съезде на дублер ограничение сохраняется.
literan (2020-10-02 09:48:50+00:00): учите ПДД. Любой перекресток отменяет действие знака ограничения скорости
LucGommans (2021-11-15 01:01:03+00:00): Hoi, thanks voor je bijdrage! Het voetpad was wel toegevoegd, maar het zuidoost uiteinde (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7917740559) was niet verbonden met het fietspad terwijl het er wel heel dichtbij lag. Ik ken de "Go Map" editor niet, normaliter zou dit niet moeten kunnen eigenlijk. Ik heb het nu verbonden; misschien iets om op te letten in de toekomst :)
VéloJesse (2021-11-15 09:34:54+00:00): Bedankt voor de oplettendheid! Ik heb destijds wat OSM apps getest maar was er niet zo tevreden over. Nu edit ik weer 'gewoon' via de browser.
jambamkin (2021-01-11 16:30:57+00:00): Hello brianboru, looks like you added node/7917747904 in the middle of an alloment, is this correct? Certainly posible but I thought it unlikely enough to check with you.
brianboru (2021-01-11 17:18:27+00:00): Thanks for spotting the error- I've moved it to a correct location
schwukas (2020-09-19 14:33:52+00:00): Hi Blackhero,
danke für die Aktualisierung. Die Werte im Feld "phone" und "website" sollten immer einem festen Schema folgen. Informationen dazu findest du hier (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone?uselang=de) und hier (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:website?uselang=de). Persönlich würde ich "cuisine" auf Englisch, also "moroccan" angeben und es damit international halten. Dazu gibt es aber keine festen Regeln. Es ist also dir überlassen.
Davon abgesehen hast du das Restaurant doppelt eingetragen. Einmal für das Gebäude an sich und einmal als alleinestehenden Knoten. Solche Duplikate führen oft zur Verwirrung, weswegen du z. B. den Knoten wieder entfernen solltest.
Solltest du noch Fragen haben, kannst du direkt hier antworten!
schwukas (2020-09-23 08:33:13+00:00): Nachdem sich hier seit vier Tagen nichts geändert hat, habe ich die Änderungen selbst vorgenommen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91349769
Foomandoonian (2020-09-17 17:47:03+00:00): Actually, probably revert this. I'll visit to see what's going on. Sorry.
Cebderby (2020-09-18 17:37:43+00:00): Hi, the imagery OS_OpenData_StreetView does show the tunnel line under the main road if it helps.  I'm guessing there are two footways, one on top of the other on the line you now have, one ramps down to the tunnel, a second ramps up the other way to the bridge to the car park roof grass?
Robhubi (inaktiv) (2020-10-15 23:00:08+00:00): Super, dass du eine neue Tour einträgst. Nachdenklich macht mich allerdings deine Quellenangabe. Wie ist sie zu verstehen? 
LG Robert
Chundelac (2020-10-17 08:18:32+00:00): Hallo, bei mir funktioniert der Link problemlos - die Website heißt: Mountainbike Strecke "Der große Jogl".