piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dieterdreist (2015-03-10 12:49:15+00:00): did not revert because it seems as if user mcheckimport has already resolved the issues that have been created.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-06 11:37:53+00:00): Kolego! Ledwo przyszedłeś do OSM, a już zabierasz się za poprawianie cudzej pracy. Proszę sie zapoznać: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632
jotpe (2015-03-05 20:24:30+00:00): verbessert mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29275633
dikkeknodel (2018-01-17 13:38:02+00:00): Hi Andy,

I am adding details to South Georgia. I see you assigned Tonk hill on Bird Island an elevation of 209 m. I can only find a source with its alternative name Stejneger Peak stating it is 190 m instead.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stejneger_Peak

https://geonames.usgs.gov/apex/f?p=138:3:0::NO::P3_ANTAR_ID,P3_TITLE:14550,Stejneger%20Peak

Do you, after 3 years, potentially remember what your source is that states 209m?

Cheers,
dikkeknodel
Andy_W (2018-01-18 10:26:12+00:00): Hi dikkeknodel,
The spot height of 209m came from a DEM and digital map generated by the British Antarctic Survey (BAS SCISTAMAP sheet 3).  This is the source of all my additions 3 years ago.
Andy.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-06 07:08:13+00:00): Thanks for the mapping!  Do you know the "brand=" of this station? Popular choices are at http://guides.obviously.com/Public-Bicycle-Work-and-Repair-Stands-2/1925
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-06 07:11:25+00:00): Also the iD preset is out of date... there was a typo in the preset... it's "chain_tool" not "chaintool".
Xmypblu (2015-03-06 15:15:08+00:00): highway=path это и есть тропа - подписывать ненужно. Если это не официальное название, которое пишут в разных документах.
Nakaner (2015-03-17 18:44:07+00:00): Sag mal, mit welchem Instrumentarium bestimmst du die Ausrichtung/den Drehwinkel eine Fahrscheinentwerters in Blankenloch (DB-Bhf.)? Oder wie zum Teufel kommst du auf direction=9.3? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3384373615/history
Nakaner (2015-03-17 18:54:03+00:00): Ich bin es halt gewohnt, dass die Anzahl der Dezimalen die Genauigkeit angibt.
mapper999 (2015-03-18 16:32:07+00:00): Ich bestimme die Ausrichtung mit den Tools von JOSM und Orientierungspunkten in der Umgebung (z.B. den Winkel der Bahnsteigkanten). Das Ergebnis ist natürlich nur auf einige Grad genau, was aber mMn ausreichend ist.
Normalerweise runde ich auf ganze bzw. 5°-Schritte je nach vermuteter Genauigkeit. Kommawerte deuten natürlich eine Genauigkeit an, die mit dieser Methode keinesfalls gegeben ist.
Danke für den Hinweis. Da werde ich in Zukunft besser drauf achten.
cx19 (2015-03-05 14:58:19+00:00): WEA hinzugefügt
cx19 (2015-03-05 14:57:31+00:00): WEA hinzugefügt
Panka (2015-03-05 16:40:37+00:00): mist, mist ... da war doch ein weg ... ich weiß jetzt nur nicht, wie ich das wieder heilen kann ... also so wie es war, war es gut!
floscher (2015-03-05 20:24:38+00:00): Hallo Panka, das sieht doch gut aus.
Der Weg war vorher nicht mit der L 605 verbunden, es war aber auch nicht klar, ob der Weg nun unter der Straße durch oder darüber führt.
Das hast Du nun geklärt, indem Du den Weg geteilt hast und das Teil über der Straße zur Brücke gemacht hast.
floscher (2015-03-05 20:38:52+00:00): Sorry, hatte mich vertan. Scheinbar hab ich vorher und nachher verwechselt ;-).
Habe Dir jetzt den vorherigen Stand mit dem JOSM-reverter-plugin wiederhergestellt.
Siehe http://osm.org/changeset/29275835
macserv (2015-03-05 18:03:55+00:00): Change description was cut off... this change added the rest of Capella Dr.  Also added a website for JPMorgan Chase.
serock (2015-03-05 21:01:30+00:00): Yo vivo cerca de esa calle y se dejo de llamar hace mucho Prayones, ahora esa calle se Luis de Sarro.
Martianz (2015-03-06 15:34:56+00:00): Como vi varios carteles y tablitas de casas que tenían ese nombre pensé/supuse que de Sarro era el anterior y Prayones el nuevo. Ahí lo vuelvo a de Sarro.
Arnaud Champollion (2022-05-18 05:09:54+00:00): Bonjour,
Le chemin semble porter, dans leur nom "difficile" une information qui devrait plutôt figurer dans les attributs afin d'être correctement prise en compte.
Le champ "nom" est réservé au nom propre du chemin lorsqu'il en possède un.
Bonne journée,
Shernott (2015-03-21 10:54:59+00:00): Salut Mathieu,
Je ne suis pas sur si on peut appeler la partie dans le est encore un "parc" et si la partie au nord fait encore partie de l'Hermitage. A mon avis le parc de l'Hemitage se limite à la partie au sud-ouest du Signal de Sauvabelin.
Shernott
Shernott (2015-03-21 11:55:41+00:00): Sur une seconde pensée, je pense je le Parc de l'Hermitage se limite à la partie au sud de la Fondation de l'Hermitage: http://www.lausanne.ch/thematiques/nature-et-domaines/espaces-verts/parcs-et-promenades/les-parcs-historiques/parc-de-l-hermitage.html
Shernott
mathieuS (2015-03-21 12:31:34+00:00): Salut,

En créant la relation pour le parc, j'ai fortement hésité s'il fallait y inclure la partie est, constituée de forêt, ou pas. Donc peut-être qu'on devrait en effet retirer cette partie-là

Par contre, je pense que le parc s'étend au nord jusqu'au signal. En tout cas, il est décrit comme "le prolongement naturel des Bois de Sauvabelin" et l'arrêt de bus entre la fondation et le tribunal s'appelle Hermitage.
Shernott (2015-03-21 13:04:53+00:00): Salut,
Je ne suis pas sur par rapport à la prairie et les arbres fruitiers au nord de la Fondation: Pour moi leur esprit est plutôt "agriculture" que "parc". Mais je ne crois pas que le petit parc au nord du Signal de Sauvabelin fait encore partie.
mathieuS (2015-03-21 13:41:08+00:00): Effectivement, le parc au nord du signal n'en fait certainement pas partie. J'ai déjà fait une première modification du contour du parc : http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29634514

Concernant la limite nord, je ne sais vraiment pas ce qu'il convient de faire. Malheureusement, je ne crois pas que la ville ait placé des panneaux verts marquant les limites du parc, comme c'est le cas à d'autres endroits.
Shernott (2015-03-21 13:59:44+00:00): Alors laissons le parc sous sa forme actuelle. Highly efficient (re-)use of ways BTW... :-)
mathieuS (2015-03-21 21:22:23+00:00): Peut-être qu'on devrait encore exclure certaines parties couvertes de forêt à l'est et au sud. À voir ...
Shernott (2015-03-21 21:37:53+00:00): Moi je serais plutôt pour inclure le petit bout de forêt au sud-est (en dessous des prairies clôturées). Les arbres et les sentiers là sont entretenues comme dans un parc. Et une fois la bonne forme trouvée, je serais pour détacher le forêt dans le parc du multipolygon "Forêt de Sauvabelin": Les deux au même temps me semblent d'être des concepts contradictoires, donc soit l'un, soit l'autre.
mathieuS (2015-03-21 21:59:08+00:00): Je pense que ta proposition est la plus correcte. Tu veux bien faire les modifications nécessaires ?
Shernott (2015-03-21 22:24:15+00:00): Je peux m'en occuper un des ces jours, mais au moment j'ai des autres priorités hors de OSM.
Shernott (2015-03-22 18:15:55+00:00): Voilà, c'est fait: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29662059
kartler175 (2015-03-06 17:28:26+00:00): Bitte nicht neinfach neue Wege über schon vorhandene zeichnen!
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=11.09580&lat=49.74058&zoom=15&opacity=1.00&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways
Xmypblu (2015-03-07 16:47:19+00:00): не надо удалять линии на которых есть отношения! этой правкой поломал много чего, просьба быть аккуратней. Если не видишь отношения или что-то не знаешь - переходи на josm и читай вика
Driveround3 (2017-01-30 15:54:16+00:00): Beaucoup de relations manœuvre avec un "from" ou un "to" qui n'est pas unique
_Christobal_ (2017-01-30 21:08:10+00:00): Bonsoir, j'ai pu intervenir sur plusieurs lignes, le plus souvent en complétant ce qui existait déjà en partie : soit des lignes avec les sens aller et retour sous le même identifiant, soit d'autres lignes  avec les sens aller et retour identifiés séparément. Je ne sais pas quelle option est la plus pertinente... Cordialement.
Driveround3 (2017-01-31 09:39:24+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai parcouru plusieurs cas de manœuvres erronées (avec plusieurs membres "from" ou "to" qui les composent) dans la zone avec un changeset à votre nom (les cas que j'ai observé n'appartiennent peut-être pas tous à ce changeset). 
Il est possible que vous ne soyez pas le créateur de la relation manœuvre mais que l'une de vos modifications aux abords l'ai modifiée de manière à vous associer comme dernière personne ayant édité la relation. De la même manière je ne sais pas si avant votre modification la relation était déjà fausse. Je vous notifie simplement, si cela vous concerne / est pertinent pour vous, de surveiller le comportement de votre outil d'édition vis-à-vis des relations, en veillant à associer un seul membre "from", un seul "via" (dans 90% des cas, parfois il peut y en avoir plusieurs) et un seul "to" à une relation de manœuvre. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Cordialement
_Christobal_ (2017-01-31 20:26:52+00:00): Bonsoir,
Vous serait-il possible de préciser le(s) point(s) qui pose(nt) problème, afin que je comprenne bien la situation ? Merci ! Cordialement.
Driveround3 (2017-02-01 08:35:28+00:00): Celle-ci est l'un des cas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4176508 . Votre changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29803338 . Et voici l'élément qui était auparavant dans la relation avec le rôle "from" (rôle en double du coup): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255720088
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-22 15:56:34+00:00): A do jakiej ulicy należy ten budynek: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229425464
Pytam, bo sam numerek to trochę mało...
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-03-08 16:28:46+00:00): It looks as if you have deleted quite a lot of nodes and changed the road's ref from the National EO2 to the European E86, whereas the ref is for national numbers. You wouldn't mind explaining the reason why?

Amaroussi.
flohoff (2015-03-14 13:03:05+00:00): Hi,

in this changeset you added a node with amenityav=Lavatoio - this popped up in the taginfo statistics as a typo for amenity. I am unshure about language but are you talking about amenity=toilets?

Flo
effebi-sm (2015-03-14 13:40:20+00:00): Typing error, correct !  (amenity=Lavatoio)
Es: https://www.google.it/search?q=immagini+antichi+lavatoi&newwindow=1&safe=active&rlz=1C1GGGE_itIT612IT612&espv=2&biw=1280&bih=685&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=BDgEVfqVNOLuyQOIloHQDA&ved=0CCAQsAQ
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-01-08 10:21:41+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM! Thanks for adding lots of details in this area. Just one thing, be careful with the "name" tag. You shouldn't say "name=Grass" for just a grassy area. The landuse=grass is enough to record that the area is grass. You should only use the "name" for actual names. Likewise you shouldn't add "name=Residential Dwelling". The "name" value for houses should be the real official name, kinda like "name=The White House" :)

If you don't know the name, it's totally OK to just leave it blank!
naoliv (2015-03-06 14:10:25+00:00): Pedro, você colocou várias vias como secondary apenas por estarem duplicadas. No entanto existe um problema: elas estão no meio do nada, sem conexão com outras vias importantes. Procure sempre classificar as vias de forma a manter uma conexão entre elas e não apenas por serem ruas duplicadas ou não.
jgpacker (2015-03-08 12:00:15+00:00): Tome um pouco mais de cuidado ao fundir duas linhas de uma mesma rua. Neste conjunto de alterações, me parece que duas linhas da Rua Tenente Antônio João foram fundidas, e cada uma tinha uma etiqueta surface=* com valores diferentes. O resultado foi que a etiqueta ficou "surface=paving_stones;asphalt", 
mas não faz sentido dois valores para superfície.
Isto é um detalhe sem muita importância. Só estou comentando mesmo. Se possível arrume este detalhe.
naoliv (2015-03-31 03:49:03+00:00): Juarez, você apagou uma área de proteção ambiental.
Por favor, tenha mais cuidado para não remover nem modificar objetos válidos.
jachzohnson (2015-03-05 21:50:21+00:00): Pest Control Services, Exterminator, Bed Bug Removal, Rodent Removal
jachzohnson (2015-03-05 21:50:06+00:00): Pest Control Services, Exterminator, Bed Bug Removal, Rodent Removal
pnorman (2015-03-06 00:35:17+00:00): Why did you change bulding=bulding to building=bulding?
Swen Wacker (2015-03-06 08:31:21+00:00): I read http://blog.jochentopf.com/2015-03-05-new-taginfo-features-and-a-challenge.html and thought it would be a good idea to correct an obvious error. That was a mistake. It's okay if you reverted my edit.
pnorman (2015-03-06 17:01:40+00:00): My point is that you didn't correct the error - they're both errors, spelling building wrong
woodpeck (2015-03-06 06:42:03+00:00): Hallo Swen, dieses Changeset ist ein "mechanischer Edit", in dem Du ohne Ansehen von Details einen Tag durch einen anderen ersetzt hast. Dass Du nicht genau hingeschaut hast, sieht man daran, dass Du auch solche Nodes "korrigiert" hast, bei denen das building-Tag eigentlich komplett entfernt hätte werden müssen. Bitte unterlasse diese Art von "Korrekturen" in der Zukunft, denn sie verschlechtern unsere Daten. Korrekturen an Tags sind willkommen, aber nur, wenn sie sorgfältig gemacht werden und nicht blind.
Swen Wacker (2015-03-06 08:27:54+00:00): Ja, Du hast recht. das war falsch. Ich habe das eben in der Mailingliste gesehen und erkenne den Fehler. Revertierst Du den Edit?
jachzohnson (2015-03-05 21:48:50+00:00): Pest Control Services, Exterminator, Bed Bug Removal, Rodent Removal
Durko_freemap (2015-03-16 12:09:08+00:00): Ahoj Adam, most 331448276 je zle, je len nakresleny na cestu 83403907.
Vdaka za opravu.
Durko_freemap (2015-03-16 12:12:24+00:00): este pridam http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=19.48264&lat=49.47972&zoom=17&opacity=0.96
Adam_Piszczek (2015-03-16 15:57:39+00:00): Ahoj,oprava mostu
VinceDiNoto (2015-03-05 22:08:05+00:00): This is closer to the center of the college property.  The Name on this property was wrong also.
szali (2015-03-13 11:32:15+00:00): Szia!
Dűlőneveket nem úgy szoktunk felvenni, hogy az adott landuse=* poligont nevezzük el, hanem place=locality pontot helyezünk el a dűlő közepén, és arra tesszük a nevet. Mint pl. Bánréve mellett a szlovák részen látható. Vagy mondjuk Balatonendréd környékén.
Üdv,
szali
MichaelVL (2015-03-06 06:23:32+00:00): Addresses in Denmark stem from official sources and there is not necessarily any logic behind numbering.  This address was added by findvej which is the (old) robot that synchronized addresses from official sources into OSM.

Please revert this changeset.
Graham Asher (2015-03-06 10:59:38+00:00): Hi Michael - please feel free to put the number back if you really think it is genuine, which I strongly doubt. The number 999 is often used as a special value for 'don't know' or 'not applicable'. It would be nice to have some independent evidence.
MichaelVL (2015-03-06 15:43:02+00:00): Hi,
Although the number might be odd, it is still an official address so I don't see any reason to doubt it.  Note that official addresses in Denmark sometimes are assigned to non-building objects like windmills, environmental test stations etc. Danish distress applications for phones also use these address 'locators' in case of accidents (like swimmers drifting out to sea).

The official Danish addresses can be accessed in several places, e.g.:

http://danmarksadresser.dk/danmarks-adresser/0/42

...and here you can also see the address+number.
maraf24 (2015-03-06 14:56:35+00:00): To pole "Opis zmian" przy zapisie to nie jest żart. Należy je wypełniać. Np. tak "dodanie budynków", "wyrysowanie rzeki".
aceman444 (2026-04-30 21:22:52+00:00): Hi, what do these relations on admin_level=11 represent? You only mention acronyms like ZSJ and SAZP.
Malin (2026-05-03 19:33:17+00:00): It seems to be https://rpi.gov.sk/metadata/3dfb452c-6bdc-463d-a1d3-f9a529fa3b5f
Základné sídelné jednotky (ZSJ)
Curt Krone (2016-02-02 20:36:30+00:00): many of the buildings in this changeset are incorrectly tagged. building:height is not a valid tag, the height tag should be used.

see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
SomeoneElse (2015-03-09 23:26:42+00:00): Geographically this is quite a large changeset, and "Typos" doesn't really explain what you're doing and where. It would help other mappers find out what has changed near them if you could:

o Use smaller bounding boxes

o Explain in more detail what changes have been made and why.

Often typos are made by new mappers; in such cases a message explaining what has happened would be helpful (you may have already done this by PM of course).
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-03-19 19:52:35+00:00): I frequently send a PM, or a changeset note, for typos where it seems instructive.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-06 03:31:44+00:00): Popsuta ciągłość granicy: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2920981#map=19/51.34793/20.23601
stephankn (2015-03-15 10:35:33+00:00): You have changed the name tag to be mixed Thai/English in this changeset. This is not the usual way we do in Thailand. Please check the wiki on bilingual name tags. name is supposed to be in Thai script. English names are in name:en for map makers to decide whether to include it in their individual map design.
Skippern (2015-03-06 12:49:17+00:00): Para descarte de pilhas acho melhor usa o etiquete "amenity=recycling", veja pagina no wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Tag:amenity%3Drecycling
Wagner Bonfim (2015-03-06 19:45:51+00:00): Grato. Aproveitei e coloquei a etiqueta "recycling:batteries=yes", está correta?
Skippern (2015-03-06 19:49:24+00:00): Eu nao conheco este lugar bem, não e um supermercado que usando, mas para descarte da pilhas, sim e certa.
Mohammad233 (2015-03-06 03:55:36+00:00): تجویز عینک و لنزهای تماسی نرم و سخت و هیبرید با تجهیزات کامل
Skippern (2015-03-06 12:39:23+00:00): Banco nao preciso o etiquete "name", basta coloque no "brand" (preferido) ou "operator", se a agencia tem um nome especial pode coloque no "name"
Viajero Perdido (2019-12-12 17:55:44+00:00): Hi alester.  Greetings from Alberta.

Do you still feel leisure=park is most appropriate for these areas?  I'm inclined to think, boundary=protected_area, possibly also leisure=nature_reserve, with protect_class=5, 7, or 21, for all three of which the wiki mentions recreation.

The current definition of leisure=park suggests open city-style play space, somewhat at odds with forests and even glaciers.  It's always bugged me a bit, seeing "parks" on glaciers.

I've been mapping in BC lately, and - if you're in agreement with this - would be happy to change these over.  What do you think?
Viajero Perdido (2020-02-02 05:02:50+00:00): That would be ... no?
Skippern (2015-03-06 12:50:54+00:00): Nao deve usar o etiquete "building" no nó. Para melhor mapea-lo, procure etiquetes como "office" ou "amenity" para ver que melhor atender o INSS no verdade.
Wagner Bonfim (2015-03-06 19:51:15+00:00): É uma agência de atendimento do governo, escolhi então "office:government", o que acha?
Skippern (2015-03-06 20:01:24+00:00): "office=government" acho e proprio sim
iWowik (2015-03-13 15:08:14+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=491060#p491060
tbicr (2015-03-13 21:32:15+00:00): http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=491111#p491111
SomeoneElse (2015-03-06 20:44:48+00:00): Hello,  I think that something's gone a bit wrong with this changeset.

You've changed addr:Street to addr:street on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309760649/history , but surely as mapped "addr:housenumber=29" makes no sense at all here?  The odd houses number up to 13, and then apparently the next 8 all share number 29.  If you see something like this I'd at the very least add an OSM note explaining the discrepancy; and in this case there's probably enough information to add individual housnumbers.

Also please do use changeset comments explaining what you're doing and why, and smaller bounding boxes (so that people from the south of Brazil to the north of Germany don't wonder what you've changed) would also greatly help your fellow mappers to understand what's happening.

Finally - something that would really help, and not enough people within OSM do - these sorts of typos are often made by new users, who don't know that they've made an error.  it would be great if you help them by mentioning (in a welcoming and friendly way) what the problem was and what you fixed.  Of course, you may have already done this by OSM message - if so, thank you very much!

Best Regards,
Andy Townsend (SomeoneElse) on behalf of the OpenStreetMap Data Working Group
will_p (2015-03-06 11:05:21+00:00): Hello,

You have added a no-right-turn restriction from High Street to New Street (Long Eaton). Are you sure that is correct? New Street is tagged as oneway from High Street, so your change blocks all access.

Will
BearT (2015-03-08 22:06:48+00:00): Hi,

du hast die Runde Priedroef genannt. Ich hab mir gerade ein (etwas älteres) Werbeprospekt der Gegend angeschaut und dort steht Priedröf, ebenso am Gipfel. Sollten die ganzen 'oe' ev. durch 'ö' ersetzt werden?
user_5359 (2015-03-06 15:32:14+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Danke für das Eintragen, dass das Hefe nicht mehr existiert, aber leider hat das Haus dabei seine vierte Ecke verloren. Problem ist bereits gefixt, aber bitte etwas mehr Vorsicht beim Löschen von Daten.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen           Georg V.  (OSM=user_5359)
user_5359 (2015-03-06 18:56:31+00:00): Autokorrektur machte aus Café das Wörtchen Hefe. Sorry
SomeoneElse (2015-03-15 14:14:28+00:00): Is http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4651566/history really a university called "cool"?  It seems unlikely...
user_5359 (2015-03-07 06:23:17+00:00): Bitte keine GPS-Tranks als Fußweg hochladen, Rest kommt als PM über den OSM-Kanal.
user_5359 (2015-03-16 17:09:27+00:00): Sorry! Keine Reaktion: Datenänderung wird zurückgedreht.
Hjart (2015-03-10 07:47:48+00:00): Jeg vil gerne igen bede dig undgå at koble diverse polygoner (inklusive parkeringspladser) sammen med vejnettet. Jeg ved godt at der er mange der har gjort det og stadig gør det, men det har altså nogle ulemper og jeg bruger ofte meget tid på at separere vejnet (highway=*) og disse polygoner for nemmere at kunne få øje på og rette fejl.
Spectrokid (2015-03-10 08:25:07+00:00): Hej, 
Jeg må tilstå jeg ikke helt fatter problemet.  Jeg kan godt se at det kan være irriterende hvis man arbejder med store veje, som måske indgå i et relation.  Men hvilke "problemer" er der at kontrollere i et 5 punkts "service" vej?  Og hvis vejen ER udkanten af P-pladsen, så giver det jo mening at p-pladsen rykker med når man rykker vejen, nej?  For mig er fordelen at a: det ser pænt ud og b: det er logisk.  Ulempen er at det kan være svært tilgængeligt for nybegyndere, men for 90% af de p-pladser jeg tegner er problemet ikke værre end at de kan slette hele l*rtet og tegne p-pladsen på nyt i under 30 sekunder.

mvh
Michel
Robert Whittaker (2016-11-30 22:02:31+00:00): I'm curious as to the source for the postcodes in this edit. In particular the Houses on the outside of the south-west part of Rhodes Avenue (numbers 1-47 odd, e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/330070359 ) were tagged wtih addr:postcode=BB1 8ND, but according to Code-Point Open, this is the postcode is for the houses on Ramsgate Drive, such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361843123 . Do you know what the actual postcode of those Rhodes Avenue houses should be?
eggie (2017-12-19 14:22:19+00:00): Na jaren toch weer een edit.. daarom..

Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Thalassin (2015-03-06 22:12:10+00:00): Hi, ich wollte kurz fragen, warum du die Ostumfahrung wieder auf die L1052 umgewidmet hast, obwohl doch seit letztem - oder vorletztem - Jahr die Straße zur B7 hochgestuft wurde?
hunsly (2018-12-28 18:27:35+00:00): Azóta már jelentősen változott a nyomvonal. Bár szerintem nem érdemes hozzá nyúlni, az a biztos, ha lekezdik építeni. :)
hno2 (2015-03-08 14:41:40+00:00): additional changeset comment: 
fixed ACCess--> access
deleted unnecessary one member multipolygon relation
hno2 (2015-03-08 14:42:38+00:00): + õneway=no --> no need for a tag (note the "wrong" encoding)
SomeoneElse (2015-03-10 02:28:47+00:00): You seem to have deleted "opening_hours:holydays" from http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3314274507/history , was that deliberate?