piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Fidelis Assis (2017-10-30 14:22:38+00:00): Como usei esse plugin pela primeira vez, fiz um a um testando localmente até ganhar confiança. O script na verdade é um compilador de mapas para 7Ways que publiquei (gpsutil.com/7ways) a partir do conversor OSM=>MP do Liosha. Tenho trabalhado nesse compilador há alguns anos incluindo melhorias no endereçamento reverso para buscas e novas facilidades. A mais recente é a extração de pontos de alerta do OSM para uso em GPS. A ideia é motivar os participantes de fóruns que coletam pontos a atualizar o OSM pois a extração poderá ser feita a qualquer momento e por qualquer pessoa. Durante essa extração, faço verificações nos alertas e listo problemas encontrados (ex. aqueles que devem estar sobre uma via ou relacionado para se obter sentido e direção mas não estão, via preferencial em nó inicial/final, tags ausentes, incompatibilidade entre maxspeeds do ponto e da via, etc). Os nós não conectados são identificados nesses testes. A versão publicada não é a mais atual com todos esses testes. Devo atualizar em breve assim que estabilizar.
josmougn (2022-08-24 20:55:18+00:00): salu
Le tag maxwidth sur les barrières est mal employé, exemple ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3437214029/history.
Il faudrait utiliser maxwidth:physical ou bien spacing
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxwidth:physical
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:spacing
A +
JJIglesias (2017-10-26 22:27:03+00:00): Please be aware that this "islands" of wood are NOT FOREST as per OSM defintion of wood and forest, also could not be named unless you know the species, to precluded feeding data with no practical porpouse, just testing
GerdP (2017-11-02 08:29:31+00:00): HI and welcome to OSM!
I've fixed a few problems in this area:
1) typo highway=tracks instead of track
2) roads ending at landuse=farmland ways
3) roads ending at amenity=school
My changes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53444421
Hope this helps and happy mapping!
praeteritum (2023-11-29 14:00:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144589178.
naoliv (2017-10-28 16:23:10+00:00): Fidelis, aqui é o mesmo caso do outro changeset. Existe uma relação enforcement para o radar. O radar deve ser representado onde ele se encontra (ao lado da via).
Ao grudá-lo na rua os aplicativos irão entender que o radar se aplica a ambas direções da via (enquanto que na realidade ele apenas pega uma direção)
praeteritum (2023-11-29 13:59:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144589125.
naoliv (2017-10-28 16:21:31+00:00): Fidelis, nesse caso não tinha necessidade (e nem foi correto) ter movido o nó do radar para a via.
Note que existe uma relação que agrega esse nó do radar que ficava fora da via https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4491237
Nesse tipo de relação (enforcement) o objeto deve ficar onde ele realmente se encontra (ao lado da pista).
literan (2017-10-27 11:00:31+00:00): Добрый день. Здания надо рисовать по основанию, а не по крыше! У вас же здание на улицу вылезло. Я поправлю.
Russ McD (2018-10-27 00:26:19+00:00): Way 535692685 : This way has been drawn following the river in many places.  As it was traced rather than taken from a GPS log, can you be sure this is the actual route ?  If I rode my trail bike along your track, can you assure me I would not drown ?
It would also have been a real nice gesture to trace relevant parts of the river in, (which I have now done) to show this could be a very wet passage. 
Any comment ?
ndm (2017-10-26 19:13:02+00:00): I understand why you added the restrictions - but they should only be there if they are signed -- are you sure there's a sign there?
lossy (2017-10-26 19:37:33+00:00): I am not sure if there is a sign but there is a traffic island making it impossible. 

How is best to map this? It is not very optimal at the moment. If approaching from the south on Gloucester road then it is not advisable to do a u-turn in the middle of the road to get to Overton road.
ndm (2017-10-27 17:53:31+00:00): It doesn't have "junction=roundabout" -- if a router wants to recommend a violent turn, then it probably needs fixing, But common sense should also prevail when using a results from routing s/ware.

I'll have a look at the signage in the future..
Cebderby (2017-10-28 12:14:59+00:00): There won't be any no-U-turn signage in a situation like this because there's really nothing to U-turn around - it's more a less a normal 2 lane road with a narrow divide to prevent all right turns and aid pedestrian crossing. The ends of the one ways can have ahead-only restrictions as that is the only safe and intended flow.
b-jazz (2017-10-27 03:27:53+00:00): Levi Lane appears to go through someone's backyard and makes it so they have to cross the street to get to their private swimming pool. Is the imagery that out of date?
Mike McCune (2017-10-27 13:42:04+00:00): imagery is out of date, this is a new street with new homes being developed. The lot was graded in late 2016.

Here is a photo from Northwest West Road looking into the property at Levi Lane from March 2017:

https://i.imgur.com/qlqBA1Y.jpg
Minh Nguyen (2017-11-30 17:00:31+00:00): I made a few corrections in changeset 54210692. Of note, it isn’t necessary to collapse a segregated intersection (such as at Red Bank and Duck Creek) down into one highway=traffic_signals node; mainstream routers are capable of treating it as one intersection despite having multiple intersecting nodes.

Also, I was unaware of the crossing=pedestrian_signals tag – thanks for that!
letihu (2017-11-05 20:35:32+00:00): Wenn hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535726650/history
das Gebäude von dir gemappt wurde,warum ist 5 Tage später das gleiche Gebäude hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533968617/history
wieder gemappt?
Wieder 2 Tage später schon wieder 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533634393/history.
Hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533634395/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/533968618/history#map=19/51.31626/6.59995
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535726651/history
und in der Gegend noch öffters zu sehen.
roschitom (2017-10-27 11:34:57+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe noch kleine Änderungen vorgenommen (Syntax und Formatierungen),
damit sie von Programmen ausgewertet werden können. Die Öffnungszeiten funktionieren jetzt.
http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/?zoom=18&lat=51.38655&lon=12.45015&layers=B0T&filter=none&tags=opening_hours
Die Umwandlung der Telefonnummer in das internationale  ITU-T E.164 Format ermöglicht jetzt Anrufe direkt aus einer Anwendung heraus.
Der name Tag soll nur Eigennamen enthalten und keine Beschreibungen. Die Zahnarztpraxis ist schon im Schlüssel http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=dentist?uselang=de enthalten. Für die vollständige Bezeichnung  ist der operator Tag, der schon vorbildlich ausgefüllt ist.

Grüße ... roschitom
Gustav Franz (2017-10-28 11:06:54+00:00): Hallo roschitom,
nochmals vielen Dank für Ihre Mühe. Jetzt sollte ja alles funktionieren..
Viele Grüße
R0bst3r (2017-10-27 11:43:16+00:00): Hallo Bolero, 
das Tag ist eigentlich schon richtig, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:place%3Dsquare.
Ich nehme an, dir gefällt nicht, dass es auf osm.org nicht gerendert wird? Indem du umtaggst, wird sich das einfache Tag gegenüber dem falsch verwendeten Tag highway=pedestrian und area=yes aber niemals durchsetzen können.
Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
Viele Grüße
iz11 (2018-01-04 20:27:19+00:00): Hello!
 
Az Aranyvölgy utcát átépítették 2016-ban, a nyomvonal is módosult.

Te most visszaállítottad az utca 2015-ös állapotát, régi GPX-ek és régi műholdkép alapján.

A környéket én pontosítottam (2016), saját GPX trace:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/iz11/traces/2143750

Az utcát kiszélesítették, új külön kerékpárút, új járda, emiatt lebontott épületek. 
A használható műholdképeken még most sem látszanak a változások.
literan (2017-10-27 10:36:02+00:00): извините, но вы здесь устроили чудовищный бардак (например, завели Мичуринский проспект в многоэтажку). Ваши правки придется откатить. Опишите словами, что вы хотели сделать, я поправлю.
Nixrb (2017-10-27 13:04:47+00:00): Простите.
1. ул Раменки больше не выходит на Мичуринский пр. (этой дуги больше нет), а движение идет прямо в ПП3538.

2. Мичуринский на против дома 38 в область, больше не разделяется дорога, и поворота на ПП3538 нет. Теперь там разворот из области в центр, напротив храма.

3. Мичуринский 54к1 разворот из центра в область.
literan (2017-10-27 13:21:45+00:00): Не до конца понятно)) На Народной карте корректно отрисовано? https://n.maps.yandex.ru/#!/?z=17&ll=37.493470%2C55.694739&l=nk%23sat
Nixrb (2017-10-27 13:31:12+00:00): Почти. С Мичуринского в область поворота налево на Прпроезд больше нет. 

Дороги между храмами тоже нет, никакой.
freebeer (2018-06-13 04:18:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 59796278 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info alpine hut spam
ndm (2017-10-26 21:47:10+00:00): This is unnecessary "tagging for the router" - Strava need to fix their app. Other routers have no problems: http://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_foot&route=51.50505%2C-2.61403%3B51.50292%2C-2.61347#map=18/51.50398/-2.61405
SK53 (2017-10-27 10:02:51+00:00): If the information is accurate then it is not 'tagging for the router', merely making access permissions explicit. Routers which implicitly route on service roads may cause other problems.
opendcc (2019-08-02 21:38:50+00:00): Hallo,

www.moosthenning.de/export/download.php?id=2631 sagt auf Seite 272 Pfarrer-Moser-Ring und Joseph-Schleicher-Bogen. Du hat einen anderen Namen eingetragen - was stimmt?
martinro (2019-08-05 19:51:14+00:00): Servus,
als ich vor zwei Jahren den GPS-Track aufgezeichnet und gemappt habe, waren noch keine Straßennamen vor Ort angeschrieben. Ich habe versehentlich oder absichtlich den Name der Nachbarstraße übernommen, da kann ich mich nicht mehr erinnern. Somit dürfte der Beschluss aus dem Link oben richtig sein. Bitte einfach anpassen (oder mir mitteilen, wenn ich das tun soll).
opendcc (2019-08-05 19:53:08+00:00): Hallo,

es wäre gut, wenn Du das machen könntest. Danke.
GerdP (2017-11-02 07:53:07+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway="Materiels didacticques" on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27941974
I assume you wanted to add a new tag instead of changing the highway=residential?
GerdP (2017-11-06 08:13:33+00:00): I've reverted your change now. Maybe you wanted to add another node for a shop ?
jennawoodward53 (2017-11-01 23:02:55+00:00): Cowan/Hinton/Mann: #USAID #GWU
Carlos Brys (2017-10-30 20:40:57+00:00): En el mapa no se cargan las situaciones temporales. Solo se muestra lo existente, que es la calle
muralito (2017-10-27 00:47:38+00:00): Domingo:

No pongas datos personales por favor.

Contame que estas queriendo mapear asi puedo ayudarte, porque todo lo que es edificio parece para corregir.
smaprs (2017-10-27 14:43:42+00:00): És edicion de maps.me, en general no dan respuestas.
eggie (2017-10-26 20:50:54+00:00): Tip: Je kunt net zo goed die tag oneway= helemaal verwijderen. Alleen als je bang bent dat een andere mapper er weer oneway van maakt dan laten staan. Vaak doen we dat bij parallelfietspaden die "twoway" zijn.
Constable (2017-10-27 09:42:54+00:00): Ciao, perdonami ma non capisco molto il tuo metodo di mappatura. Con questo changeset (http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=53274888) hai eliminato tutti i tag dei negozi di quest'area, poi due ore e mezza dopo, con questo altro changeset (http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=53276665) sei tornato qua ed hai ri-aggiunto tutto, dimenticando qualche tag (il lidl in fondo all'area commerciale non ha più il tag shop=supermarket, il Decathlon qua è scritto senza "h" ed allo spaccio occhiali vision hai aggiunto un tag shop=optician quando in realtà bastava aggiungere una "p" al già presenta tag "sho=optician").
In generale è buona cosa non cancellare gli oggetti della mappa, è molto meglio trasformarli, in modo che guardando lo storico di un elemento si capisca cos'era in precedenza; non è una regola fondamentale ma può essere utile in più casi.
In questo caso però non capisco che bisogno ci fosse di rimuovere e poi tornare a reinserire i negozi/edifici.
Grazie, ciao
ginfix (2017-10-27 15:58:35+00:00): Ciao, scusa ma per raddrizzare l'edificio ho sbagliato e non riuscivo più a rimediare, ho unito e salvato, mi sono accorto e ho cancellato e rifatto, se ho commesso degli errori rimedierò la Lidl non mi sembra di averla toccata
Constable (2017-10-29 08:55:33+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la risposta. Se in futuro dovessi avere problemi scrivimi pure, in modo da non trovati più nella situazione di dover cancellare e aggiungere nuovamente elementi dalla mappa.
eggie (2017-10-27 14:22:39+00:00): De roundabout bij Teeniem heb ik de richting goed gezet. In Israël immers rechts op de weg.
eggie (2017-10-27 14:23:29+00:00): fixed wrong direction roundabout.
highflyer74 (2017-10-29 14:58:45+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Denke daran, Tags (also Schlüssel=Wert) nach den etablierten Tags (welche immer in englischer Sprache abgefasst sind) im Wiki zu nutzen. 

Ein anderer Mapper und ich haben es zwischenzeitlich angepasst.

Wenn Du noch Fragen hast, melde Dich gern!
highflyer74 (2017-10-29 15:01:08+00:00): Noch vergessen: passe bitte bei jeder Änderung den Änderungskommentar entsprechend an. An diesem Änderungssatz steht noch etwas von Tulipanstraße. Siehe hierzu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
dgitto (2017-10-26 21:34:33+00:00): benvenuto in OSM!
è là di fronte il camping? perché il punto lo hai messo un po' in mezzo alla strada
llex_v (2017-10-27 07:30:08+00:00): buogiorno
non ricordo questo campeggio :) ma sulla google maps è quasi nello stesso posto.
forse ha preso il posto lì
b-jazz (2017-10-27 03:03:49+00:00): @PhenS: alternatively, you could tag the way as "service=driveway", "surface=gravel", "access=private" if you wanted.
Tomas Straupis (2018-01-01 18:25:30+00:00): Nacionalinius/regioninius parkus išėmus iš ryšio, osm2pgsql jų daugiau nebekuria postgis duombazėje. Taigi šią osmose „vieno nario ryšio“ klaidą reikia ignoruoti.
Gali būti, kad tas pats vyksta su visomis ribomis (type=boundary)
manoharuss (2017-11-03 11:00:54+00:00): Hi Jeremy Quanno,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is appreciated. But I am afraid this junction you added with motorways seems fictional and does not match with satellite imagery. May I encourage only adding real information to the map.

Thanks,

Manohar
Tantri IRM-ED (2020-07-30 02:57:35+00:00): Hi dsoffe
I'va changed this road classification of this way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53276490) to residential road
Thank you
Glassman (2017-10-26 22:31:02+00:00): Do you know if there is a bridge over Lyon Creek on the path?
muralito (2017-10-27 00:41:18+00:00): Daniel, hace las pruebas solo con elementos reales por favor.

Para pruebas con cosas inventadas esta https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Geofiction que es lo mismo que OpenStreetMap pero en un mundo ficticio.
DanielComesana (2018-03-21 13:07:48+00:00): Muralito disculpa la molestia, soy nuevo en OpenStreetMap y necesito manejar marcas (puntos y zonas) privadas sobre el mapa.
No preciso que se persistan en mapa comunitario, me basta con que se puedan bajar las marcas a un archivo por ej. json y luego se puedan leer y mostrar en el mapa por si se desean modificar.
Puedes por favor comentarme si esto lo puedo hacer con OpenStreetMap y darme alguna pauta de como hacerlo, buenas practicas o recomendaciones?
Mi correo es daniel.comesana@gmail.com
Gracias y saludos
muralito (2018-03-21 14:48:31+00:00): Para puntos y datos privados mira si te sirve https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/es/
DanielComesana (2018-03-23 16:57:38+00:00): Muralito, muchas gracias por tu respuesta y buena disposicion !!
Aprovecho el intercambio y te paso otro sitio muy bueno para editar y bajar/subir a json: geojson.io, por otra parte estoy seguro que ya conoces pero Leaflet es una muy buena libreria Javascript para mostrar datos sobre OpenStreetMap. Gracias nuevamente y saludos.
Carlos Brys (2017-10-30 20:35:33+00:00): Se elimina el nodo. en OSM no se carga informacion del tipo personal
Constable (2017-12-07 08:40:33+00:00): Hi, looks like you edited this park a month ago, do you mind having a look at this note?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1231713
Thanks for your help!
mueschel (2017-11-05 13:03:19+00:00): Hi,
this edit (and some more changesets) contains quite a number of mistakes:
- Several of the building polygons have an invalid geometry, they must not intersect with themselves.
- In aerial images I can't see some of the structures, and some existing features that were already mapped you have deleted.
- On several hundred nodes you added the tags building=commercial, name=Unicentro which shouldn't be there
- the height tags seem unrealistic - 2.5 meters is smaller than any mall I have ever seen, you would have to crawl inside the building.
- many buildings have the tag "Uso=Residencial" which is not used in any other place.

Would you please have a look to these issues and correct them? 

Jan
carciofo (2018-01-14 16:53:59+00:00): Hi Jonathan, this looks like an import judging by the tags in the relations. Could you please let us know what source you used for this along with a link to the license or any discussion to that effect? Thanks in advance.
carciofo (2018-04-16 19:47:54+00:00): Since we never heard back from you regarding the license, the import has been reverted in changeset 58148644.
SafwatHalaby (2017-10-28 09:05:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM. Are you sure there's a circular power line? It doesn't look right
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-22 13:07:02+00:00): Reverted. Please discuss here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53514922
tonyf1 (2017-10-28 03:36:49+00:00): Hi. I think leisure=fitness_station is a better fit? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=fitness_centre. Also the name may be better deleted, its for proper names not descriptions see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only Thanks for your contributions
aharvey (2017-10-28 08:06:25+00:00): Just adding the link for fitness station https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station
tonyf1 (2017-10-31 05:06:15+00:00): No reply. I made the changes, see Changeset #53384389
pitscheplatsch (2017-10-29 09:19:16+00:00): Hi crvcarvalho, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 
Furthermore, can you please revert your map changes?
See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset= 53277449
pitscheplatsch (2017-10-29 09:19:02+00:00): Hi crvcarvalho, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? 
Furthermore, can you please revert your map changes?
See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=53277452
SafwatHalaby (2017-11-22 13:07:06+00:00): Reverted. Please discuss here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/53514922
M!dgard (2018-01-29 19:59:26+00:00): A shop selling e-cigarettes is not an electronics shop, but a smoking shop.
M!dgard (2018-01-29 20:04:24+00:00): Tag: shop=e-cigarette
Glassman (2017-10-27 13:23:17+00:00): Welcome - One recommendation - Use full spelling of street names. We do not use abbreviations in OSM. Software can easily abbreviate, but has a hard time un-abbreviating.
Glassman (2017-10-27 13:26:12+00:00): Actually I see you the name field for the address. The name field should only be used for the actual name of the building. I fixed yours and the houses just to the north of your edit.
bdiscoe (2017-10-27 06:28:32+00:00): harcher, what is really the source here?  It is being uploaded too fast for manual tracing, which makes it seem like an import. And "source" is probably not "Digitalglobe", because the features do not align to either Digitalglobe Standard or Premium.  They do align, however, quite closely to Bing.
harcher (2017-10-27 06:41:20+00:00): Hi bdiscoe, I'm having trouble viewing the structures in my browser, but I recall uploading this changeset. The data is an import; the structures were delinated offline in QGIS using recent images downloaded directly from Digitalglobe EV Webhosting. However, in some cases, there was conflicting with existing structures in OSM, so I deleted duplicated structures from the existing layer but kept those that showed areas not previously uploaded into OSM. In this case, the structures overlapped frequently with the area with roads, which was cleaned to prevent duplication, but did not in the other two thirds.
bdiscoe (2017-10-27 06:47:00+00:00): Hi, thanks for the information. I'm glad you remember the changeset since it was only 5 hours ago :-)  It sounds like you do know what you are doing. That "Digitalglobe EV" must just happen to match Bing.  BTW, what does #akros mean?  It would be good to put more in your changeset comments to explain what is being uploaded (like, mostly buildings in this case).
harcher (2017-10-27 06:59:37+00:00): Feels like days! Thanks, I can add more detail; as you may suspect from the quick rate of upload, we're on a time crunch to upload structure files for a malaria spray project in Eastern Province Zambia, so neglected comments (but not quality efforts). I have two more to upload this morning, and I'll try to add more detail. Thanks for the quick response to the uploads.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-01 11:54:04+00:00): 
    Hello!

    Sorry for bothering about an ancient edit.

    But is PFM:garmin_type=0xa meaning anything at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/39211125/history ?

Can you remove this tag or replace by more clear one? It looks like debris from GPS trace import, handling similar tags on this object would be appreciated

(if there is more than one surviving tag like that from your edits: do you prefer separate message for each, list of all at once or something in between?)
tyr_asd (2017-10-27 17:09:43+00:00): Hi! Another mapper has a question about this change: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1186541 (in English: previously this path didn't have a double curve and had the curve 30m towards the North/West – has this path recently been altered?)

Would be cool if you could confirm this again. :)

Best,
Martin
jeroenrozema74 (2017-10-28 01:15:44+00:00): Yes, I was there the 23.okt.2017. The previous path was overgrown with shrub after it was blocked by a large fallen tree.
literan (2017-10-27 10:41:30+00:00): и зачем тут сразу три пожаркки в одном доме?
JJIglesias (2017-10-29 23:49:52+00:00): Thanks for editing at #OSM_BO
JJIglesias (2017-10-29 23:50:55+00:00): Very edition of Wood areas.
Thanks
aharvey (2017-11-01 22:55:08+00:00): There are now two post offices here

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4312386629
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/535847473

There should only be one amenity=post_office since there is only one post office.

I suggest migrate across tags from the node to the way and delete the node.
drgeoffb (2017-11-02 01:11:09+00:00): Will do, thanks for feedback. I guessed one of them would need to be removed, but thought it might be a bit presumptuous to be removing other folks' work before I was sure of what I'm doing.
ElliottPlack (2021-10-01 05:27:07+00:00): Hi there, in OSM a cycleway is generally a paved, urban path dedicated exclusively to bicycles. Natural surface trails like this should not be tagged as a cycleway, they should be tagged as a path. You can update bicycle (and foot) to yes or no according to signs on the ground. Occasionally you'll see a trail that does not allow bikes, so you'd add bicycle=no there. This is all detailed here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway

Also, be aware that for routing purposes, bicycle=yes is assumed for highway=path as is foot=yes. Cheers!
praeteritum (2023-11-28 12:16:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 144546665.
user_5359 (2017-10-27 09:05:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t forget to add crossing point between crossing highways.