piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-01-05 11:26:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
------------------------------
Review: Wanneer de wegen gereed zijn dan ook de specificatie construction=residential verwijderen.

Kijk nog even naar je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96971124
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-05 11:48:16+00:00): specificaties construction verwijderd...  water en voetgangersbrug aangepast.
chlenix (2021-01-05 11:12:10+00:00): как называется плагин, чтоб такое делать
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96972338
darkonus (2021-01-05 11:35:38+00:00): CAD Tools, функція «Cut corners» з параметром 20. Але, попереджаю, цей плагін має певні баги. Щоб їх оминути, його треба використовувати тільки на новостворених полігонах. У випадку з наявним полігоном я спочатку копіюю його, згладжую копію, а потім використовую функцію «замінити геометрію» (utilsplugin).
chlenix (2021-01-05 18:58:49+00:00): спасибо
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96972338
user_1566574 (2021-01-05 18:00:56+00:00): Bonsoir,
Concernant le chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892236342, vous l'avez défini comme « Route mineure ».
(voir définition https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=unclassified)

Si ce chemin n'est pas bitumé, il serait préférable de le définir comme :
1. – « Chemin non carrossable », c'est à dire un sentier forestier ou un chemin balisé. (déf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=path)

2. – « Piste agricole ou forestière », chemin non balisé ou qui semble utilisé pour un usage agricole/forestier. (déf. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=track)

Merci pour vos contributions, n'hésitez pas pour toute question. 😉
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-06 11:30:02+00:00): Ciao. Per favore, non usare le immagini satellitari di Bing perché non sono ben allineate. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96973542
limes11 (2021-01-05 11:23:30+00:00): Hi,
you need to add the building; otherwise, a building_passage is pointless. 

I did it for you.

Greets
kumarxeq (2021-01-06 04:18:13+00:00): Thanks for your suggestions. I will make sure to implement it in my future edits. Always happy to learn from the community
Hadi Omid (2021-01-07 08:39:46+00:00): سلام، وقت بخیر
لطفا برای ویرایش هایی که انجام میدید توضیح دقیقتری بنویسید
 ادغام مسیرهای هم نام، در صورتی که ریلیشن یا تگ متفاوت داشته باشن درست نیست
همچنین میتونید داخل گروه تلگرام عضو بشید و سوالات خودتون رو اونجا مطرح کنید
ممنون
kapazao (2021-02-18 09:55:50+00:00): Buenos días, he pasado por la GR-30 y he visto que no cuadran los números de las salidas con los que pusiste, no sé de dónde sacaste la información pero es incorrecta y es necesario corregirlo.
Un saludo
fjavier_gr (2021-02-18 11:14:01+00:00): Lo sé, pero con el confinamiento no pude pasar para verificarlas, creo que te lo comenté. El número sale de ir contando salidas, seguramente habrá números que se hayan ido salteando y por eso no cuadran. Si tú pasas a menudo y no te importa corregirlas dímelo, sino hay que esperar unos días a que se acabe el confinamiento perimetral de Granada capital.
TheNet1996 (2021-01-05 12:04:27+00:00): Hallo HerrBausA,
Willkommen bei OSM :)
Kleiner Hinweis: die Webseite des Hundesalons ist falsch geschrieben. Vielleicht korrigierst du das nochmal.
Viele Grüße
Mike
olo81 (2022-06-01 19:50:12+00:00): nazwa opisowa, do poprawy
Vinber-Pro (2021-01-05 13:31:38+00:00): super,
j'ai ajouté les batiments manquants.
merci
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96977936
AnnesOTILAS (2021-01-05 14:29:58+00:00): Merci Vincent !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96977936
abakus_uploader (2021-01-05 23:32:24+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
s8evq (2021-01-06 08:10:46+00:00): Hi Adri2984, Thanks for editing OSM. I have reverted this changeset, because we normally don't add access conditions as a name on objects. Rather use "access=".
s8evq (2021-01-06 08:10:29+00:00): Hi Adri2984, Thanks for editing OSM. I have reverted this changeset, because we normally don't add access conditions as a name on objects. Rather use "access=".
s8evq (2021-01-06 08:10:16+00:00): Hi Adri2984, Thanks for editing OSM. I have reverted this changeset, because we normally don't add access conditions as a name on objects. Rather use "access=".
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:34:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892265571/history has access:hvg that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Was it supposed to be access:hgv? Would using hgv access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv ) be fitting at least equally well?
Hb- (2021-01-12 18:21:26+00:00): Thanks for your fast reaction. The culvert remained as duplicated way. I deleted it in www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97391014.
Cartographer10 (2021-01-05 17:08:18+00:00): Bedankt voor je actie. Ik heb toch nog even iets gecorrigeerd aan de brug. De brug begon nog steeds in het water. Ik heb de brug nu opgeschoven en ook het water iets beter gelegd. Zie mijn wijzigingen hieronder.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96995264
!bm (2021-01-05 14:28:53+00:00): Hallo OwnerGG,

du hast hier in deinem zweiten Changeset (wiederholt) einen Weg gelöscht, der auf aktuellen Orthophotos gut sichtbar ist. Dein Changeset-Kommentar, dass es sich um einen Privatweg handle, stellt keinen ausreichenden Löschgrund dar. Im Gegenteil wird es (wieder) dazu führen, dass (Armchair-)Mapper diesen erneut einzeichnen werden, auch in Ermangelung des Wissens um diese Vorgeschichte, wie schon einmal geschehen:

In deinem früheren (ersten) Changeset  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/27397842 (2014-12-11) hattest du die ways an demselben Wegverlauf (und noch weiter südlich) ebenfalls gelöscht – damals waren zwei Weg-Relationen betroffen. Nur kurze Zeit später wurde der (hier von dir wieder gelöschte) Weg https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/325709110 neu eingezeichnet. (Wie wahrscheinlich bzw schlau es ist, bei gleichem Vorgehen abweichende, zufriedenstellendere Ergebnisse zu erzielen, überlasse ich mal deiner Bewertung.)

Da es die Datenqualität mindert und den Arbeitsaufwand der Community unnötig erhöht, verstößt es meines Erachtens nicht nur gegen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik, sondern geht in Richtung bzw ist Vandalismus wie unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism ausgeführt.

Aus vorgenannten Gründen dieses Cs revertiert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96986611

--besteGrüße!bm
SHARCRASH (2021-01-05 12:39:05+00:00): + corrected direction of "Mur Paien" walls
Shoubiya (2021-01-05 14:09:47+00:00): Good Contribution
parsd51 (2021-01-23 15:09:15+00:00): Hej KimClausen

Skoven er der allerede som multipolygon.
Jeg har overført dine rettelser til denne og slettet skoven.

Hilsen
parsd51
alessandrocarmeli (2021-08-13 22:27:44+00:00): percorso pedonale?
Domenico D'Erchia (2021-09-02 16:04:17+00:00): no, è il percorso di allineamento delle navi che transitano nel canale navigabile
ivanbranco (2022-02-13 08:45:49+00:00): Ola Mapiando,

there's a problem here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12137207

the multipolygon has 10 names and 2 place values.

I think the block names should be mapped individually, I would do it myself but I don't know which number corresponds to which area.

Also could you consider using meaningful changeset comments? "Minhas contribuicoes..." doesn't help other mappers to understand what you edited, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ivanbranco (2026-05-05 16:14:00+00:00): After four here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/182254557
Frans S (2021-01-07 15:51:46+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
A few remarks on your mappings.
See attached document for an explanation
A: not accurate mapped
C: Collected multiple buildings. mapped as 1
E: Buildings not squared
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best  regards and keep mapping
ivanbranco (2021-02-10 11:17:26+00:00): Hi Tomas,

I think there's an error in this node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7755814695
tag Benu=BENU Vaistinė
Tomas Straupis (2021-02-10 11:33:24+00:00): You're right. I've fixed it now. Thank you for noticing!
gabro00 (2021-01-05 13:36:40+00:00): Korábban létrehoztam jegyzetet hozzá: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2381023
Köszi!
felipeeugenio (2021-01-05 13:20:23+00:00): Estimado. Veo que le cambió el nombre a la calle. Antes se llamaba San Esteban

oficialmente se llama "Don Yerko"? o es quién vive ahí? En ese caso es un nombre que no se puede poner.
felipeeugenio (2021-01-05 13:20:53+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
sarahfathima (2021-01-05 13:23:49+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OSM! Your changes look good. keep it up
Vinber-Pro (2021-01-05 13:29:28+00:00): salut, le distributeur est plutôt coté général de gaule ou "parkiing" ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96982653
Fanny OTLAS (2021-01-05 13:35:44+00:00): A l'intérieur du bâtiment Banque Crédit agricole accès par l'avenue Gal de Gaulle. Je le déplace vers la route.
Vinber-Pro (2021-01-05 13:43:07+00:00): Vous êtes parfaite
Fanny OTLAS (2021-01-05 14:02:36+00:00): J'essaie de comprendre un certain Vinber
HSL_HRT (2021-01-07 08:45:05+00:00): Jos ollaan tarkkoja niin huoltotien käyttö on tuolla varmaankin vain perusteltua tähän esteeseen (barrier=bollard) saakka ... https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/S3PcrpOd2gr518Qy7NOp3g
Tuo este muuten näyttäisi puuttuvan kohteena OSM:sta.

Tuosta etelämmäs näyttäisi olevan kyseessä hyvinkin perinteinen pyörätie. Myönnetään että on hieman vanha kuva ja ilmeisesti tuolla on nyt rakennustöitä menossa joten  tarvittaisiin ehkä hieman tuoreempaa ja tarkempaa tietoa.
Frans S (2021-01-05 14:15:56+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. Just 1 remark. Always square a building with the Q key while still selected.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96982887
Frans S (2021-01-05 14:14:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors.
Just a remark.  Map 2 adjacent buildings individually. not together as 1 building.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96983021
eggie (2021-01-05 13:54:46+00:00): Dag The Moose,

Je hebt het getagd als wandelpad. Dat zal dus niet routeren voor fietsers. Moet het dan geen highway=path zijn?
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96983122

MVG,
eggie
Frans S (2021-01-05 14:07:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are rather accurate but are not squared. Please do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.

This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96983143
letihu (2021-02-16 21:03:27+00:00): Ein Gebäude mit 442 Punkten?
Ich halte solches Mappen nicht für sinnvoll.
ssuess (2021-02-17 06:48:41+00:00): Für eine Projektarbeit im Bereich Location-based Services (THM) werden die Innenbereiche von Gebäude in OSM erfasst. Verwendet wird das Simple-Indoor-Tagging-Schema https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging.
eggie (2021-01-05 13:57:49+00:00): Oke.. Zo werkt het uiteraard ook. 
Tip..
Even kort door de bocht.

Een G7 bord of duidelijk alleen bedoeld voor voetgangers .. dan highway=footway

Geen bord.. dan highway=path

MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2021-01-05 13:49:12+00:00): Ciao,

ti è già stato spiegato svariate volte di inserire le vie in maiuscolo (es. Via Filone invece di vai Filone, Piazza invece di piazza ecc.). Inoltre voglio farti notare un utilizzo smodato e spesso superfluo delle relazioni. Per esempio https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12137372 è una relazione multipoligono con un solo membro.
eggie (2021-01-05 14:29:10+00:00): Top!
Frans S (2021-01-05 13:46:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors,
Just 1 remark. Please do not include the shadow of a building in your mapping. You did that in a number of occasions.
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96983583
Frans S (2021-01-05 13:44:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Mappings are fine and accurate. No errors
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96983596
limes11 (2021-01-06 17:06:11+00:00): Hi, 

danke fuer die Eintragung. Die beiden Fehlerhinweise hier sind von dir, oder? Koenntest du die auf erledigt setzen, wenn nichts mehr zu tun ist?

Vielen Dank und viel Spass weiterhin mit OSM, 

Limes
winterkinder (2021-01-06 18:30:39+00:00): Die Fehlerhinweise sind von mir, ja.
Wenn ich herasufinde, wie ich mir die Fehlerhinweise anzeigen lassen kann, werde ich diese auf erledigt setzen.
Danke für deine Rückmeldung.

Schönen Gruß
winterkinder
limes11 (2021-01-06 18:36:16+00:00): Du hast es ja gefunden, vielen Dank!
M!dgard (2021-08-07 08:41:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/9702334 duidde je aan als eenrichting voor bus, fiets en taxi en tweerichting voor bromfietsen klasse A. Dat is een zeer onwaarschijnlijke situatie.
s8evq (2021-01-06 08:09:00+00:00): Hi Adri2984, Thanks for editing OSM. I have reverted this changeset, because we normally don't add access conditions as a name on objects. Rather use "access=".
eggie (2021-01-05 14:18:28+00:00): Beste Reinier. Het is gewoon niet correct wat je doet.
Waarom aan een (brom)fietspad toevoegen bicycle=designated.

En in je commentaar geef je aan fietsstraat. Dat zou betekenen dat het helemaal geen fietspad is.
En fietsstraat is een extra duiding aan een  highway=unclassified met als toevoeging
cyclestreet=yes.
Welke borden staan er,.
Waarom highway=service vanaf de Wilhelminasingel op twee plaatsen?
Een highway=service is een wegdeel over bv een parkeerplaats of een benzinestation.
Gewoon doorgaand verkeer gebruikt geen highway=service
Welke borden staan hier?
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-05 14:28:19+00:00): Die doorsteken vanaf de Wilhelminasingel zijn ooit verdwenen toen het G12a fietspad werd aangelegd. Op de sat foto zijn ze al niet meer te zien . Die hele serviceroad met die parkeermogelijkheden is toch verdwenen hier? 
Wat is je bron waar je nu uit put? 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-05 14:41:44+00:00): Is wellicht het stukje voor de panden 73 71 een 
highway=residential
cyclestreet=yes
traffic_sign=NL:L51  ?
eggie (2021-01-05 14:54:19+00:00): Wanneer de Puylegats een fietsstraat is geworden
Dan zal het fietspad omgebouwd moeten worden tot
highway=residential of unclassified
cyclestreet=yes
traffic_sign=NL:L51

en al die accesstags natuurlijk weg.
Nu routeert het niet voor auto's tot de oprit.
eggie
eggie (2021-01-05 15:42:47+00:00): Even ter verduidelijking https://i.imgur.com/r2G6YEk.png

Er zou dan geen inrit zijn....  alleen een uitrit aan de oostzijde.
Reinier Den Uijl (2021-01-05 19:37:01+00:00): ik hoop een verbetering te hebben aangebracht.
stuur nog een recente foto van de borden van FIETSSTRAAT toe.
eggie (2021-01-05 20:25:08+00:00): Foto's sturen gaat helaas niet met deze mail.
Geef svp het bordnummers door

Hier de bekende verkeersborden
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=NL:Overzicht_Nederlandse_Verkeersborden&direction=next&oldid=984258#C:_Geslotenverklaring

en voor fietsstraat zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Fietsstraat

 Bij ons meestal bord NL:L51
eggie (2021-01-05 21:07:57+00:00): typo NL:L51b
eggie (2024-02-09 16:48:40+00:00): Dag Reinier.. Een medemapper had van de fietsstraat weer een fietspad van gemaakt. Ik heb dat teruggedraaid naar unclassified. cyclestreet=yes 
MVG
eggie
s8evq (2021-01-06 08:08:51+00:00): Hi Adri2984, Thanks for editing OSM. I have reverted this changeset, because we normally don't add access conditions as a name on objects. Rather use "access=".
s8evq (2021-01-06 08:08:30+00:00): Hi Adri2984, Thanks for editing OSM. I have reverted this changeset, because we normally don't add access conditions as a name on objects. Rather use "access=".
s8evq (2021-01-06 08:08:05+00:00): Hi Adri2984, Thanks for editing OSM. I have reverted this changeset, because we normally don't add access conditions as a name on objects. Rather use "access=".
trigpoint (2021-01-06 08:37:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we add things that are verifiable on the ground. 

This appears to be just a translation of the English words so really does not belong in OSM.

Cheers Phil
Jim Killock (2021-01-06 11:15:56+00:00): Hi Phil, thanks for the heads up. There are already a lot of Latin names in OSM - none are verifiable on the ground. The same goes for much in Welsh outide of Wales. Nor are some English place names verifiable on the ground - eg some topology. What is the policy on these?
trigpoint (2021-01-06 14:22:56+00:00): Hi Jim
Many of the latin tags will be verifiable by history, i.e. they were Roman settlements hence are documented. Simply made up ones should be removed but that just means the community haven't spotted them yet.

Welsh names in England are verifiable by usage by native speakers, many are verifiable by road signs within Wales or by display boards on trains.

Topographical features are verifiable through usage and sourced from open and out of copyright data.

HTH Phil
Jim Killock (2021-01-06 14:55:16+00:00): I think there may be a difference of opinion on Latin usage here; Latin names exist for many English places in medieval documents. These are generally the sources for latin Wikipedia for instance. These are verifiable. This particular addition is documented, eg here: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=SlUJAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA87&dq=veratinum&hl=cy&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwih4paXx4fuAhUCQEEAHZoLBvgQ6AEwBXoECAYQAg#v=onepage&q=veratinum&f=false

If I were to find a Welsh or Russian etc place name equivalents I would have to do pretty much the same - ie, find attested documentary uses. But AThOThD I don't wish to break policies or cause problems so I will stick to adding into Wikidata and ensuring the Wikidata reference is available here.
TheNet1996 (2021-03-03 07:19:23+00:00): Servus,
ich hätte eine Frage zu diesem Teich. Woher stammt denn der Name "Alkiland"? Hast du mehr Infos darüber?
Viele Grüße
Mike
Patchanka (2021-01-05 15:58:33+00:00): bonjour 
le tag tourism=lean_to est déprécié et en plus ça ne correspond pas à un lavoir. Le tag à utiliser est amenity=lavoir (il est possible que OSMand ne "connaisse" pas ce tag).
Je vous laisse faire la correction 
merci d'avance
BCNorwich (2021-01-05 15:00:28+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

It looks like the data you added you then deleted or removed in some way. Do you need any help, please just ask?

Regards Bernard.
Abcxyz123890 (2021-01-05 15:38:02+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Thanks for getting in touch. I am doing a usability test for StreetComplete and I am using this account to add and remove updates to OpenStreetMap. I was deleting my test changes. I hope that I didn't create any issues with OpenStreetMap. This is part of a school project.

Kind regards,
George
hamspam123 (2021-01-05 15:44:19+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Thanks for getting in touch. I am doing a usability test for StreetComplete and I am using this account to add and remove updates to OpenStreetMap. I was deleting my test changes. I hope that I didn't create any issues with OpenStreetMap. This is part of a school project.

Kind regards,
George
BCNorwich (2021-01-05 17:55:15+00:00): Hi George,

 Thanks for responding. Surely you can see the results of a test on StreetComplete without uploading it. You certainly can with other editors. You might want to try JOSM, with which you can open a layer/area of OSM data, make your additions and see the outcome. You can save you test to your PC for later viewing or further testing all without uploading.

You've not caused any issues so far but it's only serious issues that are flagged as warnings. OSM has in the past had major problems with school and even university online projects where fiction has been inadvertently uploaded. So I would ask if your edits/project can be conducted offline. 

If I can help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
trigpoint (2021-01-06 08:37:09+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM. In OSM we add things that are verifiable on the ground. 

This appears to be just a translation of the English words so really does not belong in OSM.

Cheers Phil
Frans S (2021-01-05 16:16:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
See  my comment on task 263 an be so kind to improve your mappings. 
This document might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10sSghBZ1xSoo0JKAWUJH8VYood6VSL5eUI4ICnO_jg0/edit?usp=sharing

Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96985537
DDROMAGNY (2021-05-17 14:05:49+00:00): Bonjour, 
Est-il possible d'ajouter une description ainsi que la période sur laquelle le période a lieu?
Merci, 
#CDT40
20180911 (2021-01-05 21:59:56+00:00): Looks mostly fine for me.
You could add a source for your changeset. I don't know where you have the street names and the other knowledge from. By walking by (field_work), open data from government etc...
James McMinn (2021-01-05 22:14:08+00:00): Sorry, I should have said, I literally live on one of the streets and was able to add them from first hand knowledge. I will continue to update the roads as more houses and streets are completed by the builders.