piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
peregrination (2021-06-01 22:38:02+00:00): Looks like I screwed up my changeset title
aquarix (2021-06-01 22:50:57+00:00): Hello Ghybu,
a + sign is not a helpful changeset comment. Nobody knows what you have changed.
Please have a look at this article about good changeset comments and why they matter.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Best regards aquarix
mapperich (2021-06-01 22:50:23+00:00): Das ist die Quelle: https://campus.univie.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/d_campus/Campus_2025/Campus_2018/fotos/Campus_Plan082018.png
comfyquiettree (2021-06-04 06:20:24+00:00): Proč byl most přejmenován na "Most U Zelené ratolesti"? Název je pouze  "U Zelené ratolesti", pokud se nepletu.
Jiri Podhorecky (2021-06-04 10:40:33+00:00): Most neměl žádný název, pak jsem přidal U Zelené ratolesti, snažil jsem se dohledat nějaký další zdroj a místní zvyklost používání názvů mostů v ČK které neni zrovna konzistentní, (např. Most Čsl. Armády = Porákův most, Most Dr. E. Beneše, = Most Dr. Edvarda Beneše)  tedy jsem přidal slovo Most. Chápu že to není ok ale bude to shodné s ulicí stejného jména, vaši opravu tedy beru jako správnou. Díky. Průběžně odstraňuji další chyby.
LySioS (2021-06-02 19:37:47+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue à OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue.

Tes modifications sont correctes.
Merci
A+
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105701894
ovruni (2021-06-01 23:21:54+00:00): Hola, tal como le había comentado previamente el uso de nombres con abreviaturas y nombres en mayúsculas se encuentra desaconsejado. Por favor revise la documentación sobre nombres: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaturas_.28no_hacer_esto.29
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Caracteres_en_may.C3.BAsculas
Saludo
ovruni (2021-06-01 23:36:13+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. En este conjunto de cambios se ha ingresado el texto "edit", sin embargo esto no de detalles sobre los cambios realizados, por favor revise la sección sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
ovruni (2021-06-01 23:42:48+00:00): Hola, la etiqueta de edificio [0] es para edificios de manera individual, en este caso existen otros edificios internos.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:building
Housil (2021-06-01 23:40:49+00:00): Bitte Löschen, Fehler von mir
timmito (2021-06-02 02:16:38+00:00): Ich habe es gelöscht.
pza (2021-06-02 05:28:13+00:00): For reference, here is the latest in the string of extensions, dating back to last July. https://meetings.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/ieDecisionDetails.aspx?ID=2873
Frame&Focus (2021-10-29 23:25:40+00:00): Points are too close, and most ways should connect.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105702820
Mashin (2021-06-02 01:22:45+00:00): Thanks for the fixes!
Just this seems a bit off ;) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/945650594
ovruni (2021-06-02 00:23:03+00:00): Hola en el enlace que le he mandado previamente se indica que lo recomendado es el uso de primera letra capitalizado. Por ejemplo en lugar de "calle tacna", usar "Calle Tacna".
Saludos
blackboxlogic (2021-06-08 22:36:35+00:00): access=private is for places that have closed gates or "no trespassing" signs. If this parking lot of is customers of the YMCA then access=customers and operator=YMCA would be more appropriate.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105703390
blackboxlogic (2021-06-26 23:40:13+00:00): Since you haven't responded, I've fixed this.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105703390
ovruni (2021-06-02 00:52:06+00:00): Hola, le he preguntado multiples veces sobre las fuentes de estos nombres, ya que estos difieren de los del INEI, por favor envía un enlace con la referencia.
Saludos
ELVIS YABEN LUQUE ARAPA (2021-06-02 00:53:05+00:00): base catastral de Ite
ELVIS YABEN LUQUE ARAPA (2021-06-02 00:54:43+00:00): sase catastral de Ite
ovruni (2021-06-02 00:59:17+00:00): Por favor envíe un enlace que permita la verificabilidad de los datos. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Verificabilidad
CurlingMan13 (2023-03-18 22:10:06+00:00): Do not abbreviate street names.  Bleh.
ovruni (2021-06-02 01:05:28+00:00): Hola, el uso de la etiqueta de nombre no es para agregar descripciones, puede encontrar mayor información en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
Saludos
9661 (2021-06-02 01:25:29+00:00): This rather substantial changeset reverts the breakage caused by https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Laurenc%20Bostias in a series of individual edits, largely to the "name:oc" tag (plus a small number of what are likely blunders, such as removing valid wikidata tags). The reason for the revert is because the changes are clearly arbitrary (although at least they're well documented!), apparently consisting by and large of phonetic renderings of the pronunciation of random individuals. Many of the names do not even follow recognised spelling conventions (neither "norma classica" nor "norma mistraliana"). Bizarrely, the accompanying comments often designated the edits as "proposals".

In the process, I have had to zap a couple of changes that intuitively made sense and even restore what I suspect was a mistake or two in the previous edits. However, given the clearly baseless (albeit probably well-intentioned) nature of this user's changes I could not justify compounding the arbitrariness with my own unsourced edits.

The user has been notified via his profile page with the following message:

> Laurenc, ai a te demandar si te plai d'arrestar çò que fas sus OpenStreetMap amb la toponimia auvernhassa car en primièr luòc, a pas la mendra basa scientifica (anam pas botar lo nom dels toponimics angleses o alemands o quitament franceses segon coma lo ditz lo primièr pepin que trobam a la carrièra) e en segond luòc pr'amor qu'avèm ja de grafias plus o menhs normalizadas que podèm trobar dins d'obratges rigoroses e coneguts coma per exemple lo "Grand Diccionari Istoric del Puèi Domat" d'Ambroise Tardieu o pus recentament los libres del coble Fénié, e que en bona part èran ja referenciadas a OSM per via de la basa toponomica de l'IEO. Dobti pas qu'as de bonas intencions mes aquò es una òbra collectiva e cal pas trepejar lo trabalh des autres, mai que mai amb de cambiaments arbitraris que de còps sont pas ni mai en occitan. Fin finala, i aguèt tanben qualques enganadas tecnicas qu'ai corregit, per exemple l'escafament de l'etiqueta wikidata.
Baloo Uriza (2021-06-07 17:49:17+00:00): Correct number format would be +1 918 696 4637
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105704202
impiaaa (2021-06-02 14:18:41+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Please note that this is a community-run database used by multiple apps and data consumers. As such, it shouldn't be used for fictional or experimental edits.
GOwin (2021-06-02 06:20:37+00:00): Hi there, @dgp_dpwh. Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Do you work with the DPWH, as your name implies?
Facalderonm (2021-07-02 17:39:53+00:00): Por favor no modificar la prioridad de las vías en sectores donde no corresponde y dejando la modificación a medias.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2021-06-02 22:51:21+00:00): voce colocou que foi para que seja mais visivel, mas voce trocou o tipo da construção para um tipo nao existente, tornando ela menos visivel ainda
abakus_uploader (2021-06-02 22:31:58+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
tux67 (2021-06-02 09:50:09+00:00): Jetzt klappts auch mit dem CS Kommentar / Source. Die Version 17833 habe ich aber auch im Einsatz (ohne dieses Problem)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105708176
comfyquiettree (2021-06-02 05:53:27+00:00): Jednalo se o dvě pravděpodobně neexistující budovy vedle prachárny.
VA00 (2021-06-02 14:19:16+00:00): Czy to Ty skasowałeś drogę rowerową koło EnergyLandii? Dlaczego?
Dawid2849 (2021-06-02 16:08:55+00:00): No przecież *do projo* :P
zuicz (2021-06-02 19:24:12+00:00): I nawet obwodnica już otwarta!
VA00 (2021-06-02 19:57:37+00:00): Nie, to już jaja jakieś! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/443263755
gscscnd (2021-06-02 12:14:08+00:00): Ten adres już znajduje się na punkcie <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8690806098>.
Glassman (2021-06-02 16:28:11+00:00): You changed a service road to a residential. According to Snohomish county, it's just a service road. 

The landuse around the building just south of that road looks like it should be a building tag instead of landuse. Landuse typically covers a larger area.

Can you review your edits and make any changes necessary? Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105709421
gscscnd (2021-06-02 12:10:38+00:00): Tag short_name to uzupełnienie tagu name, który dodajemy do ulic, a nie do budynków/adresów.
gscscnd (2021-06-02 12:10:36+00:00): Tag short_name to uzupełnienie tagu name, który dodajemy do ulic, a nie do budynków/adresów.
dcapillae (2021-06-02 13:46:52+00:00): Good job! Thank you, ALu68.
Jose Luis Infante (2021-06-02 08:06:42+00:00): Hola,

gràcies per la teva edició. Només una cosa. Si pots recupera la via peatonal que passa pel mig de la plaça. T'explico el motiu.

Una plaça normalment és un espai (àrea) obert on qualsevol persona pot anar en la direcció que vulgui. Una via peatonal només permet anar en una direcció.

Per ajudar als enrutadors s'afegeixen vies dintre de les àrees.

Un exemple gràfic: https://maps.openrouteservice.org/#/directions/Pla%C3%A7a%20Catalunya,Barcelona,Espa%C3%B1a/Pla%C3%A7a%20Catalunya,Barcelona,Espa%C3%B1a/data/55,130,32,198,15,97,4,224,38,9,96,59,2,24,5,192,166,6,113,0,184,64,38,0,232,4,96,29,128,6,82,1,96,25,128,78,43,247,192,54,75,30,96,26,43,140,38,128,57,155,54,234,94,157,58,252,2,179,48,13,196,88,179,62,117,203,210,160,180,179,9,44,105,113,239,196,67,26,205,136,209,164,194,68,144,28,64,64,0,234,158,4,68,216,114,129,189,2,0,51,120,0,109,210,225,1,229,10,128,11,64,14,236,141,224,13,100,128,14,105,98,6,238,129,238,141,14,136,134,7,231,138,153,0,11,99,150,155,14,139,15,16,5,229,3,155,140,71,192,11,237,84,0,0

Salutacions!
ToniE (2021-06-02 07:37:46+00:00): Hallo PynkChimp,

willkommen bei OSM.

Den Edit muss ich leider rückgängig machen. Die B 304 mag hier (subjektiv) nicht für Radler geeignet sein.

Rechtlich gibt es hier kein Verbot mit dem Rad zu fahren.

Diese Diskussion kommt an dieser Stelle immer mal wieder hoch und wir haben die Schilder Situation oft geprüft. OSM mappe, was erlaubt ist und nicht was sinnvoll oder nicht sinnvoll erscheint.

Navis wie OSRM, Graphopper, ... navigieren Radler (West-Ost, Ost-West) durch Zorneding hindurch und nicht über die B304 - zumal das dann ja auch kürzer ist. Das Argument zieht also nicht (mehr).

Vioel Grüße,
Toni
SekeRob (2021-06-08 11:13:31+00:00): Hi Finix

A tag that might have your interest: condo=yes. There used to be apartments tag building=condominium if the living units were owned. Now one tags building=apartment + condo=yes if it's the case (only went to look because a mapper named a building Condominio Pietrantonio and included the pedestrian area in the building shape. ;?

have a good day.

wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Item:Q171
FinixFighter (2021-06-08 13:23:20+00:00): Hi Rob! I didn't know of this tag for specifying that units are individually owned instead of rented :O Well if we want to add it, I think that more than 90% of all buildings in Pescara are eligible for that tag... XD It would be an enormous work :P
SekeRob (2021-06-08 13:48:04+00:00): Yup, owning is everything here  Dont engage other than adding the tag whenever a building is deemed needing 'augmenting' and its not of the affita type by majority. I know blocks that have a mix... OTT tagging that. Realtors can do that. Just when its specifically named Condo XYZ i might bother with an interruption of the program.
Ciao.
woodpeck (2021-06-02 07:27:25+00:00): Dear DhiaeAGroom, can you explain what happened here? You uploaded over 400 buildings with a source of "own data", and then removed them again. What kind of "own data" is this? Are you working for a construction company or planning office or something like that?
tastrax (2021-06-17 03:35:52+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tux67 (2021-06-02 09:47:05+00:00): Hi, für alle Mitmapper wäre eine Quellenangabe eine echte Hilfe.  
In diesem Fall ist deine Änderung ohne nicht nachvollziehbar. ALKIS dokumentiert du Hausnummern so, wie sie ursprünglich gemappt waren. Welche Wissensbasis triggert deine Änderung?
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105710622
FrankJMar (2021-06-02 09:58:01+00:00): Hi, ich bin die Quelle. Im Rahmen meiner Tätigkeit als öffentlich bestellter Vermessungsingenieur habe ich das vor Ort festgestellt. Auch das zuständige Katasteramt ist von mir informiert worden.
OK?
FrankJMar (2021-06-02 10:00:12+00:00): Im übrigen ergibt sich der Fehler aus den übrigen Hausnummern in der Brabantstraße, die anders herum laufen.
tux67 (2021-06-02 10:03:58+00:00): Prima, vor Ort Kenntnis hatte ich vermutet, aber eine Quellenangabe (bei iD im Uploaddialog) a la “local knowledge“ spart die Nachfrage und macht QS einfacher.

Gruß und Danke für die Korrektur tux67
FrankJMar (2021-06-02 13:31:30+00:00): Ist die Änderung jetzt blockiert, oder warum taucht sie nicht auf?
tux67 (2021-06-02 13:39:24+00:00): Je nach Render Server für die Karten Tiles kann es Stunden bis Tage (auch abhängig vom Zoom Level) dauern.
Hier hat's schon geklappt:
https://www.sammyshp.de/fsmap/#17/51.07414/6.31386
highflyer74 (2021-06-03 07:30:23+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Damit die Daten auch genutzt werden können, muss man ein paar Dinge beachten. Sehr wichtig ist z.B. die korrekte "Formatierung" der Daten, die Du hinzufügst. Mir fielen in diesem Zusammenhang die Telefonnummern auf. Denke beim Eintragen von Telefon- und Faxnummern bitte an das internationale Format +49[Leerzeichen][Ortsvorwahl ohne "0"][Leerzeichen][Rufnummer ohne Leerzeichen]. Das Ganze ohne Striche, Klammern etc.

Achte bitte auch darauf, Dinge nicht doppelt zu mappen. Wir erfassen alles nur einmal. Das QBZ ist aktuell (wenn ich mich nicht verguckt habe) zweimal vorhanden.

Falls Du uns auch in Zukunft bei OSM unterstützen möchtest, schau gern mal bei unserem monatlichen Treffen (zur Zeit nur online, Infos unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bremen/Community) vorbei.

Ausserdem hänge ich Dir hier ein paar Links dran, in denen Du weitere Informationen zu OSM und wie es funktioniert findest. Lies Dir diese am besten einmal durch.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich gern!

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-06-02 11:49:00+00:00): Ups. Danke für die Korrektur!
bob3bob3 (2021-06-03 07:58:40+00:00): Hi Ian. In my notes I have a surface chk to run on Duchess Rd all the way to Duchess. There has been some "recent" work that was washed away in a storm, but I never found out how far the seal went from Mt Isa. Do you have any later info?
TreeTracks (2021-06-03 10:00:05+00:00): Hi Bob, I just used the available Bing/Maxar images for this stretch which from memory was all asphalt. I’m pretty sure I didn’t look at the stretch further south which was already tagged as unpaved (apart from the immediate southern end of the ways I tagged), I just filled the gaps near Mt Isa that had no surface tags. Any new Mapillary images you have will be wonderful to work from. Cheers Ian
woodpeck (2021-06-02 09:36:57+00:00): Dear user DMAGM, please explain what you did here. Your changeset bears the tags typically associated with the use of the iD editor. Yet you have somehow amassed 2585 previous empty changesets with this new account which makes it look like you are using some form of scripted upload. Also, this changeset contains many duplicate buildings like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949626613 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/949626320, both added on top of a building that has been existing here for 6 years, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342692673. This is not something that would happen during normal use of the iD editor. Please fix these problems, and explain what software and process you are using to upload these edits.
woodpeck (2021-06-02 09:39:07+00:00): It also appears that this edit is similar to one that has been done a few hours ago in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105710358 by the user DhiaeAGroom whose account has meanwhile been deleted?
user_13466877 (2021-06-02 10:55:03+00:00): self draw erbil Iraq گوندی ئیتاڵی + ئیمپایەر ڕۆیال ستی thank you
woodpeck (2021-06-02 11:36:56+00:00): Will you be able to remove the duplicate objects or do you need help with that?
kartonage (2021-06-03 19:22:02+00:00): This looks like major work if corrections needed to be done by hand. Lot's of nodes with needless addr:country tags, multiple duplicate buildings. Also user seems to be deleted (again)?
user_11418917 (2021-06-03 20:02:24+00:00): @kartonage I asked @woodpeck yesterday to revert it because this changeset add nothing to be honest.
NeisBot (2024-01-13 12:42:32+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/146028529
Kseniya_Nekrasava (2021-06-09 05:37:50+00:00): Hi! Thank you for your mapping! But you add some private information about owners those farms - it's not correct for the map. You can know more about privacy politic in OSM wiki. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105711840
woodpeck (2021-06-05 15:49:57+00:00): In this changeset you deleted a footway (350581730) that gave access to the railway platform at Zator station. On the ortophoto it looks as if this footway is still there. Has it been closed? If so, how doe people coming from Kolejowa now reach the northern of the two tracks?
woodpeck (2021-06-05 15:50:47+00:00): "do projo" is not a good changeset description; it would have been better to explain (in Polish of course) what you did and why - e.g. "removed footway at Zator station because it is closed" or so.
Dawid2849 (2021-06-05 16:21:41+00:00): "do projo" means "do projektu" (for project") (I think). Author of this changeset probably doesn't know that he is not editing map just for himself.
zuicz (2021-06-07 18:58:10+00:00): All this user changesets must be reverted. This one is already done.
Keima (2021-06-02 09:23:57+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue,

Merci d'avoir contribué à OpenStreetMap.
Je vous invite à lire cette page où vous pourrez trouver de nombreuses informations utiles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue

Concernant votre demande de relecture:
-Vous avez déplacé le nœud représentant une boutique sergent major: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3220404623 qui appartient maintenant à une rue. Est-ce normal? Souvent un nœud représentant un magasin se situe dans les limite d'un chemin qui représente un bâtiment.
-Dans les environs de la piscine vous avez enlevé le tag building=yes à plusieurs chemin comme celui-ci: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268775500 Actuellement la cartographie est étrange, il y a de nombreux "sport_centre" de piscine à coté. Quelle est la situation? Il y a un compexe "piscine" avec un bassin à l'intérieur? Si oui je vous conseille d'étendre cette objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171663723 à tout le complexe. Vous pouvez ensuite indiquer à l'intérieur les bâtiments (building=yes) et les bassins (leisure=swimming_pool voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool)
-Concernant les écoles, vous avez ajouté le nom de l'école et l'adresse à chaque bâtiment (par exemple celui-ci https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/268775068) ce qui laisse penser à un ré-utilisateur de données qu'il y a plein d'écoles car le même objet est cartographié plusieurs fois. 
Ensuite il y a t'il une école maternelle et une école primaire? Vous avez mis "name=Ecole Primaire Denis Forestier" à quasiment tous les bâtiments mais il y a deux nœuds, un pour une école maternelle et l'autre pour une école élémentaire? Le schéma de cartographie actuellement utilisé est ici: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:amenity%3Dschool

Bonne continuation,
Commune de Maurs (2021-06-02 09:38:51+00:00): Bonjour,

Concernant le nœud déplacé de la boutique "Sergent Major", il semblerait que ce soir une erreur lors d'une navigation sur la carte ... Veuillez nous en excuser.

Pour la piscine, celle-ci est en extérieur mais les bâtiments attenants sont les vestiaires, l'accueil et les locaux techniques. C'est pour cela que nous avons sélectionné et nommé l'ensemble de ces bâtiments de la même manière.

Enfin pour l'Ecole primaire Denis Forestier, c'est un ensemble scolaire public regroupant à la fois l'école maternelle et l'école élémentaire. Nous avons sélectionné la totalité des bâtiments de cet ensemble scolaire pour ajouter le nom de "Ecole primaire Denis Forestier".

Voici quelques précisions sur les sujets que vous avez évoqué.

A disposition si besoin.
Bien à vous,

Le service communication de la Maire de Maurs
ndm (2021-06-02 18:36:22+00:00): Please don't make changes without surveying - Naptan data is likely inaccurate wrt the actual bus stop signage. If you want to add an "official_name" then please do so, but don't change what's been captured from on the ground surveys.
PRICEWECA (2021-06-03 07:11:33+00:00): I hold the naptan dataset- as this is my job to keep it up to date on behalf of the highway authority. The edits that have bean made are inline with the most recent edits I just made to the data set.
ndm (2021-06-03 07:57:15+00:00): You’re misunderstanding OpenStreetMap - we map what’s on the ground and visible - not what’s in some database. Anyway I’ve added notes so that other mappers will check what’s present on the ground, I.e. ground truth.
PRICEWECA (2021-06-03 08:04:20+00:00): You misunderstand what I am saying. I manage the data which also means that I update the on street information.
ndm (2021-06-03 14:58:04+00:00): So you’ve repainted the signage, or changed the electronic display, or changed the names on the paper timetables - and those match data in OpenStreetMap. If so, fantastic.