piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Allison P (2022-05-26 19:29:22+00:00): This "fix" also deleted the boundaries of Placerville, which is an incorporated city. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/121371
Adam Schneider (2022-05-26 19:43:51+00:00): Placerville isn't an incorporated city. It might make sense to put its Historic District boundaries on the map, but not as a "city," which is what was there before.
Adam Schneider (2022-05-26 20:27:34+00:00): I've added the Historic District boundaries as defined by the NRHP, with appropriate tags (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/National_Register_of_Historic_Places).
Allison P (2022-05-26 21:16:09+00:00): It is called the City of Placerville. https://placervilleidaho.org/

Furthermore, it is listed as a city on Wikipedia.

I have also visited Placerville. It is incorporated.
Adam Schneider (2022-05-26 22:41:17+00:00): I stand corrected. However, regardless of what it calls itself, it is not a "city" by the OSM definition; it's a hamlet.  I've re-added the city limits (which are weirdly offset from the tax parcels) from Idaho GIS data.
JJIglesias (2022-05-03 04:15:04+00:00): Gracias por agregar el Hotel Silvia, tendras mas datos como telefono, email y cantidad de habitaciones.

Asi mismo te sugerimos usar las aplicaciones OSMAND y/o Organic Maps, en lugar de maps.me que ultimamente presenta muchas limitaciones y falta de actualizacion.

Gracias
JJ
ZeLonewolf (2022-05-07 23:01:50+00:00): Hi, in this changeset, you modified https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/425665123 to remove it's building tags.  Can you explain what you were trying to do here?  In the meantime, I will restore it to its original form in order to add it back to the map.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-05 20:58:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056762762 is not a building
KelsonV (2022-05-05 23:52:15+00:00): Oops! Thanks, fixing that now!
yrtimiD (2022-05-06 22:42:36+00:00): vandalism: reverted
drnoble (2022-06-03 20:03:05+00:00): Don't think this should be tagged as a motorway services. Is this parking?
bwduncan (2022-06-03 20:09:26+00:00): That's amusing, looks like StreetComplete asked me if there were toilets here and obviously I said no, because it's a car park and loading bay. Feel free to revert.
eggie (2022-05-03 05:42:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster en als zodanig ingemeten. Svp niets aan veranderen. Een luchtfoto zet je op het verkeerde been. Kijk nooit naar de daken bij schuin genomen foto's Die gebouwen hebben geen punten. Dat zie je alleen door de luchtfoto!

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-05-03 05:49:02+00:00): reverted by changeset #120486345
user_5359 (2022-05-03 05:59:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/358847694 over 100 meters, please check the position. (A church on a street?)
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-05 20:55:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056768539 is not a building
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-05 20:54:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056768988 shouldn't be a building
Enock4seth (2022-05-03 22:54:48+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for mapping. LearnOSM is a good resource for getting started https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/ . Height for buildings cannot be zero (0)

Also do not use block capital letter for names. 

Bing imagery in Sunyani is very old and should not be used for building mapping, kindly use Maxar Premium instead.  See how to do it here https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/imagery/
alwillis (2022-05-03 00:47:22+00:00): Details: https://www.randolph-ma.gov/home/news/public-notice-drinking-water-information-november-2021
habi (2026-01-28 15:22:02+00:00): Hey WAM_SNZ144_ZCH
Hier hast du https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109814107 als gleichzeitig 'in Betrieb' (aerialway=*) und 'geschlossen' erfasst (disused:aerialway=*).
Das scheint mir nicht zu stimmen :)
Weisst du da mehr dazu?
Gruss aus Bern,
Habi
eggie (2022-05-03 05:48:33+00:00): reverted by changeset #120486345

Je wijzigingen heb ik teruggedraaid.
Svp geen gebouwen veranderen.. 
De luchtfoto's zetten je op het verkeerde been. Daar staan de gebouwen niet.
Bedenk dat je een wolkenkrabber zou natekeken van het dak. Dat scheelt wel een km bij een schuingenomen foto.
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-05-03 06:03:48+00:00): In het bosgebied is wel degelijk water te zien op de hoogtekaart. Het heeft nu wel een iets andere vorm.  Ik heb het iets aa ngepast. Wellicht dat intermittent=yes kan worden toegevoegd en dat er soms wel en soms geen water is.
Up to you.
MVG
eggie
archpdx (2022-05-03 04:37:29+00:00): Hi,
It looks like you tagged the outer way of (https://osm.org/relation/13951631) as a fairway. Please note that since this fairway was mapped as a multipolygon, only the relation should be tagged, see:
https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Usage
mapper175 (2022-05-08 18:48:27+00:00): What was the reason for moving these place nodes?
Trevor_1 (2022-05-08 18:52:16+00:00): I did it to make the Windsor label visible on the farther zoom levels. Now you can zoom out to zoom level 8 and see the Windsor label.
mapper175 (2022-05-09 02:09:25+00:00): Got it, thanks for clarifying. That's a case of what the wiki calls "tagging for the renderer," or more accurately, mapping *only* for the renderer. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer for more on that, and why it's discouraged.

Instead, the wiki entry for place=city suggests placing these nodes
"at the center of the city, like the central square, a central administrative or religious building or a central road junction" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dcity

I'm attempting to revert this and the subsequent changeset 120483753 to replace the nodes.
Trevor_1 (2022-05-09 02:17:04+00:00): I moved the city nodes to the center of the urban area. This doesn't need to be reverted.
Trevor_1 (2022-05-09 02:45:18+00:00): Correction: closer to the center of the urban area within the city limits. This does match with what the wiki says. "At the center of the city".
hanchao (2022-05-03 02:56:56+00:00): 测试数据已删除
Trevor_1 (2022-05-08 18:54:59+00:00): *I moved these points to make the Windsor label visible on farther zoom levels.
Trevor_1 (2022-05-09 02:21:23+00:00): I also moved the points closer to the center of the urban area
WoodWoseWulf (2022-05-03 06:06:00+00:00): Hi Jimmy,

I've removed the descriptive name from the gate and replaced it with access=private tagging instead. Name tags should only be used for actual names rather than descriptions.

Do you know how far down the Koala Trail things remain private? If there is no access, the train itself should probably be tagged to reflect that.
Jimmy Stewpot (2022-05-03 07:33:25+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for providing me with the feedback. I appreciate it as it is my first time using open street map.

Koala trail is public access as far as the area perimeter where it passes from Olney to Watagan. At that point it traverses onto private property where there is a locked gate.

On the other side of Koala trail at Watagan Creek Road there is another locked gate which stops people from entering from the alternative direction. Between those two points there are 5 separate properties which all have locked gates.

What is the best way to handle this type of update?
WoodWoseWulf (2022-05-03 11:25:45+00:00): Thanks for the quick reply!

You could probably split the trail at the where it becomes private (via the right-click menu on a node in the iD editor) and then apply access=private to those private components.
Jimmy Stewpot (2022-05-03 22:38:38+00:00): Thank you. I have updated the trail description for all of the additional sections beyond the private property boundaries.

Does it all look good to you?
GOwin (2022-05-03 05:04:58+00:00): Hello @joserey1988. Thank you for your edits.

According to the aerial imagery, this area appears to be a farmland, rather than the factory itself. Can you elaborate?

The facotry, where the actual processing actually happens, can be tagged as industrial, but the farming areas where crops are grown are usually tagged as farmland.

Do you have questions about mapping? Check out the local community's communication channels: https://osm.org/wiki/PH, or the local mapping convention: https://osm.org/wiki/Philippines/Mapping_conventions
Frans S (2022-05-20 14:15:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
First ! use the correct Imagery. Maxar Premium. Bing, which you used , is outdated.
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
E: Rectangular buildings not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.
You mapped a rather big walled field as a building.
Just leave these objects unmapped.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120483909
drivec (2022-05-11 02:53:29+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
eggie (2022-05-03 06:22:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Kovoschiz (2022-05-03 13:22:06+00:00): 1. I have already told you to make comments before. Why would you accuse others of " insufficient local knowledge;"? 
2. Roads are only splitted when there is physical separation.
Kovoschiz (2022-05-04 03:29:53+00:00): 3.  RATP is the parent company of HK Tramway Ltd, not the direct operator.
kolasau (2022-05-10 11:04:38+00:00): Hello, RcSammy, 
What ground truth did you use to map this roundabout ( w1056781627, ... )?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120484190
Riley Choe (2022-05-10 15:42:43+00:00): I don't know what a ground truth is but the roundabout on Medical Dr. and Rangeline Rd. was listed by the city here -> ( http://carmellink.com/project.php?title=Range%20Line%20Road%20and%20Medical%20Drive%20Roundabout ) to be changed to a roundabout. I can provide photo evidence too if you would like to see
Riley Choe (2022-05-10 16:18:31+00:00): *the intersection was changed to a roundabout
drivec (2022-05-11 02:53:37+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
BudgiesEyeView (2025-06-11 21:54:10+00:00): Hello adrianojbr, thank you for all the mapping you do! I see you added the name Rua Luiz Feller to way 473678133 and way 473678138. We received Maps user feedback suggesting the street name for way 473678133 specifically may be Rua Albertina Feller Bertemes instead. The name they suggested seems to be valid for Tijucas- https://www.camaratijucas.sc.gov.br/documento/indicacao-no-50-2025-111341. Would you be able confirm that the location is correct?

Tradução automática

Olá, Adrianojbr, obrigado por todo o mapeamento que você faz! Vejo que você adicionou o nome Rua Luiz Feller às vias 473678133 e 473678138. Recebemos feedback de usuários do Maps sugerindo que o nome da via 473678133, especificamente, poderia ser Rua Albertina Feller Bertemes. O nome sugerido parece ser válido para Tijucas - https://www.camaratijucas.sc.gov.br/documento/indicacao-no-50-2025-111341. Você poderia confirmar se a localização está correta?
drivec (2022-05-11 02:57:09+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
TheSwavu (2022-05-03 09:51:20+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OSM. 

Thanks for picking up the problem with the routing here.

Just to let you know turn restrictions can only have one "from". So I've fixed this by putting in a separate way.

Happy Mapping.
drivec (2022-05-11 03:00:02+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
user_5359 (2022-05-03 06:18:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please stop overpainting existing streets. I understand you have a routing problem, but are the OSM data the problem??
Podman1234 (2022-05-03 21:48:18+00:00): Yes, it is actually - my navigation system relies on this data, so I need it to accurately show the right turn capability here. Is there some issue with indicating that a right turn is possible and legal here?
user_5359 (2022-05-04 03:56:30+00:00): You add again (see https://www.osm.org/changeset/120517415) not existing ways (with not correct tags). Please have a look on the concept of turn lanes (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn). The routing is correct.
Kovoschiz (2022-05-03 13:29:12+00:00): Again, roads are only splitted when there is physical separation. `embedded_rails:lanes=` has been used here.
drivec (2022-05-11 02:59:55+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
drivec (2022-05-11 03:00:05+00:00): Reverted and fixed based on free imagery, city GIS, and GPS traces.
skquinn (2022-05-03 04:59:29+00:00): This was from Bing not survey (oops)
skquinn (2022-05-03 04:59:34+00:00): This was from Bing not survey (oops)
Andrea Musuruane (2022-05-03 07:47:07+00:00): Ciao Mauro. Non mi e' chiaro quello che volevi fare in questo changeset. Una parte di track è etichettata con motor_vehicle=designated che significa che ci puoi passare con un veicolo a motore, e l'altra parte non ha questo tag  e il default prevede che un veicolo a motore ci possa passare comunque. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120485771
dfrcl (2022-05-03 05:27:12+00:00): Aclaración, el segmento en cuestión era el siguiente: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65624269
user_5359 (2022-05-12 04:53:50+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9710599485. Which language did you mean with name:jp = 桑港碁部道場?
user4816003805 (2022-05-12 06:17:16+00:00): D'oh! It was supposed to be Japanese, but I ended up using the domain name TLD instead of the ISO 639 code.
Nice catch, thanks!
I've fixed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120869334
azakh-world (2022-05-06 11:34:16+00:00): Hi.
Please don't copy railway=station tags to station buildings where there already exists a station node. There should be only one railway=station object at a station. A building feature is not always suitable for this since it does not repeat the geometry of the station.
archpdx (2022-05-03 05:55:15+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding this bridge, looks good to me.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
julcnx (2026-06-16 03:52:25+00:00): Hi, I migrated the surface=Murram ways in this changeset to surface=laterite: murram is a regional name for the same surface, and surface=laterite was approved as the canonical tag on 2026-06-15. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-05-04 14:55:07+00:00): 朋友你好，地铁网络的network并非写具体线路名称，而是写整个线网的名称，线路的名称应写在具体的关系内。

注意到您使用的是iD编辑器，若您不熟悉具体操作，您可在每次编辑过后提示的当地社区常驻平台上与之取得联系，沟通绘图技巧。
mavl (2022-08-18 14:38:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125065270 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. The amenity=bus_station as personal note are deleted. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6253].
WAM_SNZ144_ZCH (2022-06-26 06:09:13+00:00): Diese Bushaltestelle ist nicht mehr in Betrieb und sollte daher gelöscht werden.
mottiger (2022-06-26 07:13:59+00:00): Höi WAM
Um welche Bushaltestelle handelt es sich? Oder hast du sie bereits selbst gelöscht?
LG
WAM_SNZ144_ZCH (2022-06-26 07:22:31+00:00): Spitalstrasse Luzern vor Haus 46  Xund Bildungszentrum ( Bahnsteig Fahrtrichtung Luzerner Kantonsspital
WAM_SNZ144_ZCH (2022-06-26 07:25:58+00:00): Bussteg ist übrigens nur im Bearbeitungsmodus ersichtlich da evt. zu wenig Eigenschaften definiert wurden. Habe noch nicht gelöscht....
mottiger (2022-06-26 07:37:35+00:00): Vielen Dank, ist gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122857755#map=19/47.05870/8.30032
user_5359 (2022-05-09 10:44:19+00:00): Hallo. Bitte schau Dir nochmal https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2157989543/history an. Was ist die Bedeutung von dem Schlüssel FM?
berjk (2022-05-09 13:54:21+00:00): Hallo, was soll nicht stimmen?
FM steht für Fehlermeldung, note, Hinweis. siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/berjk
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2837305
user_5359 (2022-05-09 14:02:23+00:00): Weil Du der erste bist der diesen Schlüssel benutzt. M.E. Gehört diese Information sogar in den Changeset Kommentar.
ualios (2022-08-30 15:42:06+00:00): Ciao, questa:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1055604492
sembra una rotatoria, quindi andrebbe taggata con junction=roundabout (oneway=yes è inutile). 
Sei sicuro che l'accesso sia consentito solo ai veicoli pubblici? Attenzione poi che inserendo le rotatorie si spezzano le relazioni esistenti, e in questo caso ce ne sono molte. Prova a ricostruirle...
ualios (2022-10-13 18:09:41+00:00): vedo che hai taggato la rotatoria eliminando anche le specifiche psv. Se la rotatoria è di pubblico accesso allora andrebbe eliminato anche "access=no"
jodd (2022-11-26 16:47:31+00:00): Hallo,
mir ist aufgefallen, dass du der Bank https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4206348639 den Namen "BVB Volksbank" gegeben hast. Ich war vor kurzem dort und habe an der Tür den Namenszug "Frankfurter Volksbank" gesehen. Hatte die Bank bei deiner Beobachtung noch ihren alten Namen und sollte der nun geändert werden?
VG jodd
user_10241830 (2022-11-26 19:11:20+00:00): Hallo,

mein Besuch in Nieder-Erlenbach war schon etwas länger her (Mai 2022) und damals hieß es noch BVB Volksbank. Wenn die Filiale inzwischen umfirmiert wurde (was durchaus plausibel erscheint, da auch die Volksbank Höchst-Filialen im Westen Frankfurts sukzessive auf den neuen Namen geändert werden) kann der Name sicher geändert werden.
jodd (2022-11-26 20:10:15+00:00): Alles klar, danke für die Info! Ich ändere den Namen.
Lejun (2022-05-05 10:08:59+00:00): J’ai quelques doutes sur la contribution. Il s’agit de quoi exactement ? Une recherche en ligne de sculpture en bois par l’artiste Chara et dont l’œuvre s’appellerait Origami ne retourne rien
Lejun (2022-05-05 10:06:03+00:00): Salut et merci pour cette contribution où il semble y avoir des erreurs. En l’état tu as indiqué quatre maisons, dont une triangulaire et une imbriquée dans une autre. Le mieux serait de reprendre ça en traçant d’une seule ligne le périmètre du bâtiment et tout sera bon !
GilB (2022-08-21 17:52:30+00:00): Bonjour.
De passage à la Flocellière je suis surpris de voir un temple hindou en plein milieu d'un bois à priori non aménagé. Il y a également une incohérence entre le tag religion et le tag denomination.
S'agit-il d'une erreur ? Est-ce que ce bâtiment a été constaté sur place ?
ivanatora (2022-05-03 08:41:34+00:00): Пробвай да сложиш номера на адреса в таг addr:housenumber.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:housenumber
eggie (2022-05-03 09:04:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback  BING map is outdated en ligt op veel plaatsen verschoven. Beter PDOK actueel 7cm gebruiken
Een highway=track heeft altijd een tracktype=grade?  1tm5  
sand zal zijn tracktype4 of 5
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Jarvin10 (2022-05-03 09:31:14+00:00): Hoi Eggie,
Bedankt voor de tips en feedback. Ik zal de tracktype toevoegen.

Met vriendelijke groet,
Jarvin
SekeRob (2022-05-03 09:05:02+00:00): Hi,

sport=motor or motocross?

JIC
SekeRob (2022-05-03 07:28:18+00:00): Resolved 3 issues created by CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120456901. Bare rock renders again. Queried with mapper as to what the intend was.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-16 13:56:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123690116 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reporting some malicious edits in Iraq
eggie (2022-05-03 09:23:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback 

Moet de naam 	Dijkhofje - Vakantiewoning werkelijk renderen op de kaart. De naam kan natuurlijk wel, maar vakantiewoning?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
tux67 (2022-05-03 13:14:05+00:00): Hallo suther,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Du hattest beim Upload review requested angehakt. Änderungen sehen soweit ok aus.
Wäre nur gut, wenn du auch das Source Feld beim Upload mit Inhalt versiehst.
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120489414
yrtimiD (2022-05-10 19:18:40+00:00): Hello, what was the reason for removal of the english name from Shabazi street?
ملاك ساقط (2022-05-04 21:27:33+00:00): Hi Danil,

I would tag https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1056819266 just as man_made=water_works
→ https://perumdatirtasakti.com/profil/
Danil (2022-06-16 05:19:33+00:00): agree, thanks for letting me know :)
Alexmol (2022-05-21 12:02:32+00:00): Hi.
Is the charging station in the Sesimbra Port already constructed and in service ?
glibbertorsten (2022-05-21 14:46:36+00:00): Sorry, i can't tell you
Alexmol (2022-05-21 22:06:18+00:00): You added amenity=charging_station, the node already had construction:amenity=charging_station meaning it is under construction.
glibbertorsten (2022-05-23 05:25:00+00:00): Hi, now I see what you mean. There was a chargingstation I saw from the street on the parking area of the fish factory. On the map there was missing the "amenity"-tag, so I added it.
Alexmol (2022-05-23 18:02:57+00:00): Ok, I have now corrected it and left only the tag construction:amenity=charging_station until I get confirmation that the charging station is operational.
Thank you for your collaboration.
Shaun das Schaf (2022-05-08 08:56:46+00:00): Hallo Zeller Be(r)gland Tourismus, willkommen bei OSM!

Gehe ich recht in der Annahme, dass zwar das Restaurant geschlossen wurde, dass aber das Gebäude weiterhin steht?

Leider haben Sie das Restaurant inklusive Gebäude gelöscht. Ich habe das Gebäude wiederhergestellt.

Das Restaurant war als Punkt innerhalb des Gebäudes eingetragen. Hier hätte es also gereicht, den Punkt zu entfernen.

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
eggie (2022-05-03 09:09:27+00:00): Dag Jarvin.. Het pad staat op access=no en zal dus niet routeren. 

MVG
eggie
osmviborg (2022-05-03 09:35:40+00:00): Giver det mening at tilføje 'treerow' indenfor et 'forest' område?
kortgodt (2022-05-03 09:51:13+00:00): Ja det er en alle
b-holdet (2022-05-03 11:01:17+00:00): Kunne du så ikke dele skovområdet op i to og give luft til alleen mellem dem?
Herman Lee (2022-05-23 15:57:50+00:00): 该修改集已经退回