piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Lejun (2022-09-23 09:50:19+00:00): Hi, while I’d like to thank you for your effort contributing to OpenStreetMap, what you did has caused many issues and has been completely reverted. Could you provide further information about what you were trying to do so that we can work on it?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:36:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
abakus_uploader (2022-09-22 22:31:08+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:49:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-22 10:39:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key. I noticed that you map on JOSM.  You can square all rectangular buildings in 1 go by selecting them all and press the Q key. When you use the Building tool plugin, you automatically map squared buildings. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126497494
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:03:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-02-10 06:13:58+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5567748631/history has shop = boutique that was added in this edit
shop=boutique? Is it shop selling clothes? Then maybe shop=clothes would fit well, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=clothes

Or maybe shop=fashion_accessories ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=fashion_accessories ) would fit better? Or shop=bag ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=bag ) ?

Or is it some completely different type of shop, with tag used as "boutique" is French word for shop? In such case see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop for some documented values.

For shop=boutique info see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=boutique page
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Friendly_Ghost (2022-09-22 11:26:08+00:00): Hello,

The Ukrainian OSM community urges everyone to refrain from editing the map of Ukraine during the war, so could you please wait until the war is over?

Please visit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian%E2%80%93Ukrainian_war for details.
SekeRob (2022-09-22 19:25:26+00:00): E non all'interno dell'isola pedonale!
user_2066394 (2022-09-22 13:56:49+00:00): Die aktuell mit disused:*=* eingetragenen Objekte kannst du einfach beibehalten, die zeigen den Leerstand an.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
DwyaneWade (2022-09-23 14:43:18+00:00): Hey, danke für den Hinweis, in diesem Fall gibt es den leerstehenden Laden aber nicht mehr, der benachbarten Laden wurde erweitert. Dann passt es ja die Node zu entfernen?
user_2066394 (2022-09-23 17:50:51+00:00): Du hattest insgesamt zwei Leerstände gelöscht, der benachbarte Laden betrifft das ehemalige La Bouche?
DwyaneWade (2022-09-24 06:44:06+00:00): Genau, das andere ist die Postadresse einer NGO, da befand sich aber nie ein Büro
user_2066394 (2022-09-24 09:12:58+00:00): Einwandfrei
syncronic (2022-09-23 17:50:21+00:00): A is the country code for Austria. A95 is not a destination of this road
CoyKoi (2022-09-26 00:50:55+00:00): Thanks for fixing, this was a result of fumbling a new keyboard shortcut. Not sure why JOSM didn't flag these when I went to upload the changes it normally catches things like this for me.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126499711
Jorisbo (2022-09-26 04:52:37+00:00): Your welcome and no worries, i bump into my own typo's as well. Kind regards, Joris
mavl (2023-04-25 09:05:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2023-01-18 12:28:52+00:00): Hi! I noticed you added a `gay=yes` venue (Wingate Club) in this changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607729719 ). You may prefer to use the `lgbtq=primary` tag instead https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lgbtq which is clearer (IMO) than `gay` tag.

There's also a Telegram chat for LGBTQ people in OSM: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RainbOSM
❤️‍🔥 (2023-01-18 18:15:07+00:00): sure, I'll change the tags. https://wiki.osm.org/Key:gay was the first result in google and it wasn't obvious from that wiki page that's there's a better tag
matthias-MS (2022-09-22 11:29:24+00:00): bin nicht so geübt und will nix kaputt machen
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:51:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:50:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Brummelwuff (2022-10-06 11:20:39+00:00): Die access tags sind alle schon durch motorroad=yes impliziert https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:motorroad?uselang=de
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:39:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
mueschel (2022-10-09 09:22:22+00:00): Hi,
the tag 'deleterious' is not used in any other place - what does it mean?
voltairovicz (2022-10-09 11:35:56+00:00): I do not know what does it mean, I do not even now in which object this tag is used, because I have not used such a tag. Someone before me could type it
mueschel (2022-10-09 12:44:11+00:00): E.g. here: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10044703366/history

Maybe just a copy'n'paste error? Let me know if I just simply delete them.
Frans S (2022-09-22 15:01:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key 

* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126502065
starsep (2022-09-22 14:08:04+00:00): Cześć! Dzięki za pierwszą edycję. Chyba chciałeś dodać kawiarnię, ale zmieniłeś chodnik na kawiarnię i budynek, dodałeś do punktu adresowego dane kawiarni.
Poprawiłem w https://osm.org/changeset/126507182
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:41:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
ElliottPlack (2023-03-09 02:40:43+00:00): Hi there. When adding these new gas station roads via Lyft's "proprietary imagery," would you please consider adding the gas station roofs and building? 

Thanks,  
Elliott Plack  
OSMF Data Working Group
Emey_lyft (2023-03-09 13:03:11+00:00): Hello, ElliottPlack.
	Thanks for your suggestion. Probably we will consider adding such objects in our future projects. But at the moment adding buildings is not in our scope, we are more focused on traffic roads. 
Best regards, Ruslan
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-02 09:10:55+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
your mappings are rather sloppy and hardly squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).

* Multiple buildings has been drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes.
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 

* Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building. Each building need to be mapped individually, without connecting nodes. Buildings in a walled compound should be mapped individually.
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126502802
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:42:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Msiipola (2022-09-26 07:17:09+00:00): Ändrade vägklasser inte ok.
Vägar som går ut i skogen och slutar i inget, är normalt "track".
Vägar som går till enskilda bosättningar/byggnader är normal "service".
Unclassfied är oftast längre vägar som binder ihop andra vägar.

Läs gärna på wiki hur vi Sverige taggar på följande sida (tar lång tid att öppna):
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sv:Map_Features
Msiipola (2022-09-26 07:22:10+00:00): Generellt tycker jag att du ska skriva mer utförliga kommentarer på uppladdningar. Visserligen kan man med lite sökande se vad som har ändrats, men det underlättar om kommentaren är mer informativ än exempelvis enbart "väg", "vägar".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:47:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
skyper (2022-09-22 13:16:05+00:00): Hallo Jan,
jetzt habe ich mir sporadisch mal einen CS angeschaut und erneut kann ich weder die Quelle erkennen noch macht `indoor=no` innerhalb eines Gebäude Sinn. Wieso geht es denn genau so weiter?
Fragende Grüße,
skyper
JanW_ (2022-09-22 13:25:57+00:00): Hallo Skyper,
danke für den Hinweis. 
Den AED habe ich soeben erst eingegeben. Der Eingang befindet sich unter dem Vordach, die Treppen hoch und der Defi befindet sich unter dem Vordach. Deshalb inddor = no und die Position unter dem Dach. Ist das so verständllcih für die openStreetMap-Community und konform mit den osm-Vorgaben?
MFG
Jan
skyper (2022-09-22 13:59:42+00:00): Hi
Mmh, das Vordach fehlt wahrscheinlich noch in den Daten (und in Maps4BW). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/454532734 stellt eigentlich den Grundriss des Gebäude da, daher sollte der AED wohl außerhalb sein. Falls er doch innerhalb des Grundriss sein sollte, ist `note=Unter dem Vordach am Eingang` eventuell eine Lösung.
Grüße skyper
JanW_ (2022-09-22 14:39:09+00:00): Hi, habe note=Unter dem Vordach am Eingang übernommen. Danke für den Hinweis.
MFG
Jan
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:37:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
bkil (2022-09-22 16:03:38+00:00): Köszönjük. Elég lesz a changeset comment ("Föld feletti tűzcsap felvétele."). Nem szükséges a note=... -ba is beleírni.

Ott a szekresztőknek egymásnak szoktak  olyasmiket üzenni, hogy "It is hidden behind the bushes". Nehogy félreértés miatt letörölje mondjuk valaki később.
Buzár Ferenc (2022-09-22 16:14:48+00:00): Köszi. Amúgy ezt most szerinted sikerült hiba nélkül felrakni? Mert ha igen, akkor valószínű neki állok majd a faluban lévő összes tűzcsapot felvinni, mert az hasznos lesz itt az Önkéntes Tűzoltóknak. 
Csatolom a google térképet is hozzá. 
https://www.google.hu/maps/@47.4263928,18.6019171,3a,75y,33.81h,78.99t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1svINAzoq5hxWaKoObS4LXYg!2e0!7i16384!8i8192?hl=hu&authuser=1
bkil (2022-09-22 16:43:37+00:00): Kis türelmet kérek, mozgósítjuk a helyi szakértőt.
bkil (2022-09-22 19:28:54+00:00): Azt üzente a szakértőnk, hogy jó lesz, esetleg még ezt hozzá lehetne rakni (és a note-ot levenni): fire_hydrant:position=green
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:46:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:38:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:44:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-22 15:13:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126504515
A67-A67 (2023-02-16 12:01:39+00:00): Hoi Herrieman,
Hier lijkt iets fout gegaan te zijn met het type highway. Een rotonde hoort met één type highway getagd te worden, dus geen combinatie van secondary en secondary_link. Eventuele bypasses die niet over de rotonde zelf gaan, kunnen wel als een _link-weg worden getagd.

Zie ook:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout#Selection_of_the_right_highway_tag
Herrieman (2023-02-16 14:54:09+00:00): Hi,
Is alweer even terug dat ik dit gedaan heb, dus weet niet meer precies hoe ik dat toen bedacht had. Maar ik denk dat het te maken had met het feit dat het een turborotonde is. Voor zover ik weet een Nederlands concept, wat dus ook op de wiki niet aan de orde komt. Verschil is dat je op een turborotonde niet oneindig op de rotonde kan blijven (zonder rare fratsen uit te halen). Dat heb ik denk ik willen aangeven door de verbindingsstukken (met slechts één strook) als _link te taggen. Uiteindelijk maakt dat voor navigatie e.d. niet uit natuurlijk. Dus zo als jij het nu gedaan hebt is het ook goed natuurlijk.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-23 09:33:56+00:00): Ciao. Un amenity=fountain è una fontana ornamentale decorativa come https://flic.kr/p/2g9ASpD o https://flic.kr/p/J8b77a . E' abbastanza improbabile che una sia nella posizione dove è stata inserita. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126504838
Alberto Orlandini (2022-09-23 09:58:53+00:00): Grazie del consiglio, in effetti devo ammettere che ho faticato non poco a scegliere la tipologia di fontana, perchè non ne ho trovata nessuna che rispecchiasse veramente il caso in questione. Si tratta di una fontana intagliata in un tronco di legno con una faccia. Potevo mettere nasone, ma mi sembrava più congruo scegliere fontana decorativa. In ogni caso se hai consigli su quale tipo di fontana sia più opportuno indicare in questo caso li accetto volentieri.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-09-23 10:38:50+00:00): Se lo scopo è quello di fornire acqua potabile, al di là del fatto che la fontanella sia minimamente decorativa, come lo potrebbe essere un toret a Torino, io userei amenity=drinking_water. Ciao, Andrea
UNGSC-Jrachi (2023-06-01 17:09:27+00:00): Dopo 8 mesi vedo che non hai seguito il consiglio. Provvedo a modificare il tag in drinking_water.
Ciao, Ivo
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:48:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:40:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-14 19:35:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127540575, 127538516 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for undiscussed import of buildings with low quality. Also this user has circumvented a block by creating new accounts.