piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
joost schouppe (2023-03-10 10:05:50+00:00): Hoi Lego,
Ik heb dit gedeeltelijk teruggedraaid. Probeer alsjeblieft te vermijden om een goed ingetekend gebouw te deleten en te vervangen door een schets. Je kunt bestaande gebouwen gewoon splitsen (zie bijvoorbeeld https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/28409/id-how-do-i-divide-a-linear-row-of-residential-dwellings-to-single-buildings , maar vraag gerust om hulp als iets niet lukt).
Daarnaast zeker niet nodig om de adresgegevens die al op het gehele schoolgebied stonden nog eens op de gebouwen te zetten. Ook de naam "KIDS" is overbodig aangezien die al op de school stond. De school noemt zichzelf ook Kids, niet "buso kids". Buso is een type onderwijs, dat kunnen we wel nog als extra tag aan de school zelf toevoegen.
Als je adressen ingeeft, is het ook voldoende om enkel de straatnaam en huisnummer in te voeren, postcode en gemeente worden door software automatisch afgeleid.
starsep (2022-10-19 17:39:45+00:00): amenity=hospital
amenity_1=doctors 

Raczej do zmiany na amenity=doctors i usunięcie amenity_1
wireguy (2022-10-22 14:20:46+00:00): removed name from buildings
literan (2022-10-19 16:58:15+00:00): какие это нафиг киоски? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/317796564/history#map=19/55.59490/37.61383

заведомо кривые данные вносите в базу. Исправлю, не надо так делать
Famlam (2022-10-19 17:10:51+00:00): Bron was survey & PDOK zomerfoto's
Adhil@123 (2022-10-20 05:06:28+00:00): overlap issue are there...also check  whether there exist a 2 parallel stream nearby...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127794355
jbfournot (2022-10-20 17:10:50+00:00): Bonjour @LGENDRONNEAU,
Je ne sais pas si c'est une erreur, mais cette modification duplique la piste déjà existante. En effet, la trace du courlis est faite principalement de chemins partagés avec les riverains et agriculteurs, et tout semblait déjà là. Est-ce que je loupe quelque chose ?
ezekielf (2022-10-22 01:14:19+00:00): Thank you for the detailed work you are doing here!  However, it's not ok to delete the work of previous mappers with a promise to replace it later.  I have restored the trails deleted in this changeset here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127794755

Moving forward, please modify existing objects instead of deleting and replacing.  Thank you.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history
ezekielf (2022-10-22 01:16:30+00:00): wrong link above.  Here is the correct restoration changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127906615
Adhil@123 (2022-10-20 04:57:46+00:00): some errors are there, like overlaping issues and pls rectify wheather it single one or not
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127795670
armitageone (2022-10-26 16:39:00+00:00): Не нужно один магазин добавлять дважды. Для двух мест в одном есть особый приём.
silversurfer83 (2022-10-20 09:03:17+00:00): Moin Rolf Dieter,

sicher, dass da ein recht großes Gebäude im Wald steht? Keins der Luftbilder und auch das Kataster von Hessen gibt keinen Hinweis darauf. 
Grüße aus Korbach
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127796704
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:36:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
BertMule (2022-10-19 19:07:19+00:00): Daar gaan we weer met de bomen, zucht.

Misschien leuk om ze afzonderlijk neer te zetten.
Maar dit is incompleet.
- In het gras zijn het dubbele rijen.
- Langs de straat had ik ze ook aangegeven voor het totaalbeeld van dat plantsoen.

Voorheen waren ze er niet eens.

Dit is dus absoluut geen 'herstellen'.
BertMule (2022-10-19 19:07:56+00:00): Correctie, ik zie ze nu ook langs de straat.
BertMule (2022-10-19 19:11:21+00:00): En ik krijg nu het gevoel persoonlijk achtervolgd te worden.
Daar heb ik echt geen trek in,
eggie (2022-10-19 19:48:34+00:00): Beste BertMule.  Dat is zeker niet de bedoeling.

In OSM screen ik nieuwe mapper en begeleid deze ook. Ook wordt mij wel eens gevraagd om zaken terug te draaien. Dat doe ik dan als het kan in overleg.... behalve als het niet verantwoord is om te wachten.
Je  bent na Leiden onmiddellijk gaan mappen en zaken gaan aanpassen in het gebied waar ik normaal map. 
Ik heb al een paar opmerkingen gemaakt op je changesets, maar geen antwoord gekregen. Misschien heb je je mail niet gelezen.. dat kan... of je wilde niet reageren. Dat kan ook.
In dat geval voel ik mij vrij om iets an te passen. 
Laten we er svp geen mapingwar van maken.
Je kent m'n mening en niet alleen van mij over tree_row. 
Aparte bomen geven meer detail aan de kaart en bieden de mogelijkheid om extra info toe te voegen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=tree

Overigens kun je inderdaad losse bomen combineren volgens de wiki met tree_rows.. De vraag is of je zoiets moet doen. Het is ongebruikelijk. 
natural=tree_row
When along a road, this is sometimes called "avenue of trees", allé or allée

'k Denk niet dat tree_row is bedoeld voor plantsoenen. Wel voor lange lanen.. met de nadruk op lang. 
Je zou het kunnen aansnijden op het forum van OSM.

Het heet hier wel Parklaan, maar het is geen 'parklaan''  in de zin van. 


MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-19 20:01:10+00:00): Je hebt gelijk met de dubbele rij. Ik heb die ook toegevoegd mbv Slagboom @ Peeters
Groet
eggie
JustInnit (2022-10-20 16:52:17+00:00): Um ..., may I point out that Britain is not the same as Great Britain. 
Britain comprises England and Wales.
Great Britain comprises England, Wales and Scotland. 
I feel the people of Scotland may (justifiably) feel slightly miffed if you feel their contribution to the Union is not worth acknowledging in the shortened name for the United Kingdom. Besides, continuing with such logic you may as well just call the place England and have done with it.
jleedev (2022-10-24 15:12:11+00:00): Reverted in 128001917
cserpell (2022-10-20 21:36:16+00:00): Hola, ya no existe el museo?
gordo anorexico (2022-10-21 01:28:03+00:00): No, aún existe.
gordo anorexico (2022-10-21 01:29:39+00:00): Allí le hice un pequeño ajuste faltante, le había eliminado un nodo ya repetido.
cserpell (2022-10-21 01:32:16+00:00): Genial, muchas gracias.
geo-d (2022-10-19 18:08:07+00:00): Korrektur: source ist survey und nicht web
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-19 09:41:41+00:00): Hi, I guess this is a data import, correct?
Supaplex (2022-12-19 10:29:46+00:00): The document link of the import of Taichung address nodes
https://hackmd.io/@osm-tw/import-taichung-address
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-19 10:32:40+00:00): Thanks for your answer.

Could you mention this at least in the comment of your changesets?
Supaplex (2022-12-19 10:49:26+00:00): I am not the original importer, I just add the addr:country=TW for the previous Taichong import. You should find typebrook's related changeset. I think he already add a complete changeset comment
silversurfer83 (2023-02-19 12:43:32+00:00): Hello there :)

I don't believe, that these places really should have that name tag at all. I already contacted the person who added them in the first place and asked them to clean up the little tagging booboos. 

Greetings
silversurfer83
rjaksic (2023-02-20 20:41:13+00:00): Hi, 

I agree completely :)
Name tags should be used only for proper names if they exist, not for generic descriptions. Also, here in Croatia name tags should be in Croatian (with exceptional English versions using name:en)
One of the former bases was tagged as a building (the entire area!) so I removed that and just latter noticed the names!
BTW operator tags are also not right: there is no such operator as "ex-JNA" and it certainly doesn't "operate" around here anymore ;)

regards,
Ranko
Matija Nalis (2023-11-02 11:25:02+00:00): (also see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/133172833) -- I agree, we should not "lie for the renderer" (or for other data consumer, like OsmAnd), see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

Here, I'd use https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix e.g. `abandoned:building=*`, `abandoned:operator=*` etc.  (at least the first is rendered by OsmAnd, and if the others are not, one should request in OsmAnd that they support it instead of adding clearly incorrect tags like `operator=ex-JNA`.
Or one can use `wikidata=*` tag and add all related historical information there, so it will be shown in OsmAnd. One caring about abandoned features might also be interested in sister-project https://www.openhistoricalmap.org/
archpdx (2022-11-03 23:43:16+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for adding these street names! Please note however that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM (see https://wiki.osm.org/abbreviation). 

In this case, 'Backcountry Ave' should be unabbreviated to 'Backcountry Avenue'
Glassman (2022-10-21 22:14:48+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. 

#TIP: Square buildings by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127801732
Glassman (2022-10-21 22:18:52+00:00): The editor has a feature to add all the appropriate tags for most national brands. I updated you edit.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127802165
mariotomo (2023-01-16 16:46:04+00:00): hola Angus27. Sigues esperando retroalimentación, comentarios, quizás entrenamiento para mejorar tus contribuciones a OSM, o sea, sigues interesado en el proyecto OSM? aquí te faltó "rectangulizar" las casas, y creo que interpretaste mal unos elementos. si quieres te comento en detalle. me confirmas tu interés.
SomeoneElse (2022-10-28 22:41:54+00:00): Echoing some comments to another mapper involved here at https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6496 ;

Can everyone interested in editing in this area please try and find a suitable location for discussion and discuss what to do together there?” 

Maybe the talk-us mailing list would work, or the new Community Forum, or OSM-US’s Slack instance.

I don't mind where but it's important for discussion to happen somewhere otherwise this continual "mapping and unmapping" cycle will continue.

Best Regards,
Andy (from the Data Working Group)
Glassman (2022-10-21 22:19:03+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127802577
eggie (2022-10-19 20:23:29+00:00): Dag Henk... 
Wanneer daar geen manege (meer) is dan is het correct.. Het was geen BAG adresnode dus die kon je rustig verwijderen.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127802670

Wanneer er wel een manege is en je hebt iets per abuis verwijderd geef dan even een seintje.
MVG
eggie
Glassman (2022-10-21 22:19:09+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127802868
DUGA (2023-01-26 05:36:01+00:00): A gas station does not have a building like that, please double check your edit before the submission.
DUGA (2023-01-26 05:36:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10115000772#map=19/41.27466/-77.05037
Gavin_K88 (2023-01-26 23:19:49+00:00): Convenience store would probably fit better yeah, couldn't remember if they sold anything besides gas since it's a pretty small building
DUGA (2023-01-28 00:54:06+00:00): Actually you put the gas station at the wrong place, it is corrected now.
Glassman (2022-10-21 22:20:15+00:00): When adding a business to a building containing a number of businesses, draw the outline of the building then place a node for each individual business.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127803231
bbmiller (2022-10-19 19:52:43+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM! It's good to see you mapping. Just wanted to give you some feedback about your edits. 

This: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105344186 is not the proper way to map a road that has a bulge at the end to allow cars to turn around.  The right way to do it is to end the way at the center of the bulge and then tag the final point in the way as a turning circle (one contiguous bulge) or turning loop (has an island in the middle).
user_5359 (2023-07-01 08:18:36+00:00): Hello! Please take a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/369028654/history. You add aeroway=aerodome, but you don‘t remove closed=yes, was:aeroway=aerodome.Why?
bbmiller (2022-10-20 15:23:02+00:00): Thanks for fixing this up! Looks much better now.
user_17394343 (2022-10-25 21:33:46+00:00): It is my pleasure to fix for improvement.
RVB38 (2022-10-19 20:05:24+00:00): Dit heeft uiteraard niets te maken met 't Frietje, dit zijn enige updates van prov. domein Puyenbroeck.
Baloo Uriza (2022-10-22 18:26:57+00:00): Might consider squaring up the corners...JOSM makes short work of this but I'm pretty sure there's a way in iD as well.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127804520
BertMule (2022-10-20 09:32:47+00:00): En dan nog is het niet goed.
Je mist nog een boom.

Oftewel.
- Ongewenste 'correcties'.
- En dan nog fout ook.

Zoals gezegd: ik heb geen zin om achtervolgd te worden en overdreven op de vinger te worden gezien.

Houd daar mee op.
Als dit zo doorgaat is het extra reden om te STOPPEN.
BertMule (2022-10-20 09:34:23+00:00): Correctie: twéé bomen.
eggie (2022-10-20 09:42:51+00:00): Nee ... Daar staat  geen boom.
Die is ooit gerooid.

MVG
eggie
Nakaner-repair (2024-03-07 12:59:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 148340823 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by 'babis b' because they were uploaded using MAPS.ME, look suspicious (ATM on roads) and the user is unresponsive.
gscholz (2022-11-02 08:07:13+00:00): Hi christinaahermida,
this changeset has added errors to the OSM database as it created primary roads isolated in the middle of the desert.

Can you please fix this?

You may educate yourself about what the tag "primary" means before you continue to add further data to OSM:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dprimary

Kind regards
Guido
NorthCrab (2023-01-21 02:17:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10115109471
Co rozumiesz przez obu stronny znak B-1? Masz jakiś dowód na istnienie tam takiego znaku?
adiatmad (2022-10-20 06:01:44+00:00): Your edits look great. But it will be better to avoid adding a generic name i.e name=Building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1105352338). Maybe you want to check this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
mariotomo (2022-11-11 20:00:22+00:00): hola presidente del capítulo YMUP !
los demás maperos del país les agradecen vuestro trabajo, y esperan escuchar de ustedes. 
dando instrucciones a principiantes, por favor considerar https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios

en particular: "sin duda un buen comentario de conjunto de cambios debe incluir texto legible en lugar de «solo» el texto predeterminado"
mariotomo (2022-11-13 18:18:45+00:00): FYI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128534041
Matija Nalis (2022-11-19 18:35:58+00:00): related: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-do-youthmappers-teachosm/5501
mariotomo (2023-01-18 15:04:54+00:00): hola profesora Adamés. acuérdese de dar el buen ejemplo dentro de su capítulo, y de rectagonalizar los edificios, tecla Q. gracias!
maradames (2023-01-25 19:58:40+00:00): Buenas tardes Sr. Frasca. 

Gracias a Dios siempre me he caracterizado por dar un buen ejemplo no solo con nuestros YouthMappers sino en todas las múltiples tareas que tengo ademas de trabajar voluntariamente en este hermoso proyecto de OSM y en todas mis acciones incluyendo la forma de expresarme hacia los demás. El encuadre de los edificios ya se hizo y le agradecemos el gran interés que siempre ha mostrado hacia los YouthMappers. 

 Existe un grupo en YouthMappers que está haciendo las validaciones correspondientes para este proyecto. Saludos cordiales.
mariotomo (2023-01-25 20:19:11+00:00): buenas tardes, que bien leerla por acà en OSM. Sabrìa usted ayudarnos con entender unos detalles de este proyecto? https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/how-do-youthmappers-teachosm/5501
maradames (2023-01-27 13:02:01+00:00): Buenos dias Sr. Frasca. 

En relación a su comentario le agradeceríamos indicarnos específicamente cuáles son los detalles que a usted aún no le quedan claros con respecto al proyecto de Tonosí. 

Acerca del mismo en otras ocasiones ya le han respondido nuestras YouthMappers Nayreth, Marianne, y Adele quienes  conjuntamente con otros YouthMappers con experiencia en OSM están trabajando en la validación del mismo.  Tal como se lo mencionó Adele una vez concluido el proceso de validación se les dará a nuestros YouthMappers UP un entrenamiento que les permita conocer los aspectos que deben ser mejorados. 

Le agradecemos nuevamente su gran interés en este proyecto  y en los proyectos que realizan los YouthMappers UP y lo exhortamos a que igualmente usted promueva en la comunidad de OSM, especialmente en Panamá, el trabajar en otros proyectos específicos bajo su liderazgo ya que la información y las contribuciones que se hacen en el OSM por muy pequeñas que sean pueden contribuir al mejoramiento de las condiciones  de nuestras comunidades en nuestros países que tanto lo necesitan.
Saludos y que tenga un excelente  día.
mariotomo (2023-01-27 15:54:27+00:00): buenas tardes profesora Adamés.
los detalles que faltan, si revisa esta página en el community.osm.org, se trata (1) de todo lo que se acostumbra documentar para cualquier edición coordenada y (2) que esta información aparezca en el wiki, en su propia página, con (3) un enlace desde vuestra página del capítulo.
Sólo a título de ejemplo le repito uno de los detalles que faltan: cuándo se piensa cerrar el proyecto.
Pero le sugiero revisar la página enlazada arriba, pues creo que otros pusieron la pregunta en forma más explicita y clara.
Yo mismo no tengo proyectos, mapeo lo que veo cuando lo veo, o en forma no orgánica, y no pienso meterme en coordinar grupos, gracias. Cuando veo que otros están necesitando comentarios y sugerencias, se las proporciono, y a veces esto tiene el efecto de mejorar errores sistemáticos.
Glassman (2022-10-21 22:31:26+00:00): I'm confused by the walking bridge. You added the footway with a bridge and also a polygon as a bridge. Normally we only add the bridge tag to the footway. Also, you connected the footway to the stream. I'm guessing they don't actually intersect. Nor does the footway connect to any other feature. Can you review this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127805832
eggie (2022-10-20 06:38:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Carnildo (2022-10-19 22:29:46+00:00): Is there a reason why you deleted a building near the intersection of Fifth and Poplar?  It's still visible in all available imagery.
Famlam (2022-12-23 23:56:54+00:00): Betreffende weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1105360040
Waarschijnlijk bedoel je 'surface=unpaved'?
E de Wit (2022-10-19 20:58:02+00:00): Te snel geklikt.. Gras heb ik niet aangeraakt, alleen stukje Oentzemastate.
MxxCon (2022-10-19 22:06:19+00:00): Hello.
Please provide supporting information that this biz accepts payments in crypto.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127806968
saunter (2022-10-19 22:44:23+00:00): They requested being included in btcmap.org by filling the form, you can see it here: https://github.com/teambtcmap/btcmap-data/issues/691
moje_konto (2022-10-25 16:44:23+00:00): But their website seems to allow anybody fill the form, it looks similar to Notes option here.

So it would be better to verify locations in other way, the same as with Notes.

If bulk edits base only on such external list, then it's import: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct
saunter (2022-10-25 16:50:57+00:00): I always look for confirmation. I contact the merchants by email or facebook If I don't see any information about the bitcoin acceptance on their website/socials.
rarad74 (2022-10-21 15:56:48+00:00): Salut. Din cate stiu camerele radar sau de supraveghere nu se pun pe drum direct , ci langa (sau nu?)
danutzu (2022-10-21 16:06:27+00:00): Alea le-am pus de test... Era ideea de camere ptr Rovinieta... dar nu am gasit ceva dedicat..
O sa le sterg cat de curand...
Friendly_Ghost (2022-10-19 22:49:44+00:00): I reverted your changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127810986 because the Ukrainian OSM community urges us not to edit the map of Ukraine during the war there (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Russian–Ukrainian_war).
Grass-snake (2025-05-13 19:31:25+00:00): Здравствуйте, уточните пожалуйста, здесь улицы или проезды? По моим данным тут должны быть проезды.

https://fias.nalog.ru/Search/IndexWithPath?objectId=334420&addressType=2
anastasia_ (2025-05-14 11:02:20+00:00): Здравствуйте!
По пкк: 23:21:0401011:4797 (пример) (на пкк все еще все это снт и улицы).
28.09.2023 14:37:03 был изменен с СНТ Рассвет на квартал Рассвет в фиасе
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-10-31 03:23:46+00:00): لماذا تضيف أسماء قبيحة للخريطة العامة!!
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-20 16:45:22+00:00): Ciao. Il problema è che è stata copiata e incollata translata la relazione 14644132 in questo changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126866373&relations=true Era meglio fare un revert. Ciao, Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2022-10-20 16:51:58+00:00): Fatto revert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127847887 Ciao, Andrea
Paolo Benazzo (2022-10-20 21:30:48+00:00): Grazie!
Paolo
mavl (2024-11-13 05:35:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 159076412 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: incompatible sources - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/16857].
Vinber (2023-02-03 15:02:14+00:00): salut nicolas,
le fixme=à préciser dès que visible sur le cadastre me surprends, donc par curiosité, pourquoi ajoutes-tu ce fixme ? Tu penses que le cadastre va apporter quelque chose de plus à la photo ?

au plaisir
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
cserpell (2022-10-20 21:31:36+00:00): Hola / Hi,

Why do you say bridge? Is there any bridge around here?
cserpell (2022-10-20 21:30:13+00:00): Hi, I recommend you to square the buildings before saving, as most houses have straight angles, and not strange shapes.
mcliquid (2022-10-27 08:19:49+00:00): Hallo Martina,

wurde das Haus abgerissen oder wieso hast du es gelöscht?

Viele Grüße
mcliquid (2022-10-30 09:26:20+00:00): Keine Antwort, CS wurde wiederhergestellt.