piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
D0T1X (2021-11-29 12:21:32+00:00): Hi Eggie,

Thanks voor je opmerking. Het is inderdaad Art. 461 WvS. 
De hele weg ligt op prive terrein inderdaad. Over de gehele lengte strekt een heg een meter of twee ten oosten van de weg. Dit is de erfscheiding. Aan beide kanten zijn ook poorten die de weg kunnen afsluiten (dit zo ver ik weet ook verplicht voor Prive terein). Ik zal kijken of ik binnenkort nog eens opnieuw langs kan wandelen om met een verse blik de poorten in te tekenen. volgens: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dgate
eggie (2021-11-29 13:03:27+00:00): Je hebt het dan inderdaad correct getagd zo..
Wel even wachten tot het droog wordt. 
Gr eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-11-29 12:53:50+00:00): Hello Bharat Patil,
The fact that you're adding 10,000 nodes at a time looks very much like an import.  These must follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines , which includes discussing it with the community beforehand.  Also, you'll need to explain a bit more about your edit, not just one imagery source.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .  For example, what plan for conflation did you have?
Best Regards,
Andy
MxxCon (2021-11-30 01:18:16+00:00): Updated version of the given area?🤨 Updated version of Eastern United States?🤨 What did you edit here with 10000 additions?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114356681
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-30 19:43:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 114415727, 114404745, 114410731, 114407543, 114413370 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting an undiscussed import in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5486 .
wireguy (2021-11-29 23:26:02+00:00): hi Bharat, welcome to osm!
You've duplicated existing service roads.   I've deleted your duplicate.   You may need to zoom in more to see the highways.   Keep mapping!
user_5359 (2021-11-30 13:25:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You import information with the undefined keys 
ComplexID=UID013450
comment=Walkways
(example see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1007307422). 

Please describe the content and meaning of these keys! 

It seams comment is duplicate to highway value (please remove)

Please save smaller areas!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-30 19:43:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 114415727, 114404745, 114410731, 114407543, 114413370 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting an undiscussed import in the USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5486 .
Frans S (2021-11-29 13:00:38+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

The round building in the nord part is not a building. Look te the shadow and compare it with the nearby buildings.
You tagged a rural road as a major highway. Please read this wiki about tagging highways in African Countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114356909
Frans S (2021-11-29 13:12:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

Please review your knowledge how to tag highways. You tag 'Tertiary" on rural small roads/
There is no need to map tracks/path not leading to houses or hamlets.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114356909
Marc Mongenet (2024-11-15 09:39:59+00:00): Inventer des ponts inexistants n'est pas une "résolution", c'est une erreur.
xkillah (2021-11-29 19:28:58+00:00): Будьте добры, приведите телефон Велеса к формату https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:phone
DD1GJ (2021-11-29 23:31:28+00:00): Hallo carihi,

es verlassen sich viele Leute darauf, dass OSM 1:1 der Realität entspricht. So eine Mischung aus wohl einigen realen Sachen gemischt mit erfundenen und völlig falsch attributierten Dingen ist daher schon als Vandalismus einzuordnen.  Ich habe daher alles komplett zurückgesetzt.

Wo studierst Du?

Wer hat Dir den "Arbeitsauftrag" gegeben?

Haben auch noch andere Studenten solche "Arbeitsaufträge" erhalten?

Mach bitte Deinen Kursleiter auf folgendes aufmerksam:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Organised_Editing_Guidelines

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße, Joachim
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
user_2066394 (2021-11-29 13:21:55+00:00): Was ist mit der Zufahrt passiert?
opendcc (2021-11-29 15:44:20+00:00): Wurde nicht gebaut - stimmt so
kawino85 (2021-11-29 12:12:18+00:00): Please straighten your building footprints by pressing "Q" on them.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse (2021-11-29 12:20:19+00:00): Hello VARVAR8,
Just a reminder that the questions that I linked to in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107276082 .
As I said there, it's looking increasingly likely that we'll have no option to revert your MapWithAI additions, and for information the DWG has had another request this morning to delete them.
Best Regards,
Andy
eggie (2021-11-29 12:48:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-29 12:59:42+00:00): De verbinding heb ik even veranderd in 'alley' Dat lijkt me meer gepast. 
Best lastig al die wegtypen. 
Het zuidelijke stukje is geen wandelpad (G7) in de zin van.. 


De bollard  tags zitten allemaal al ingebakken op het paard moped en mofa na. 
Ook emergency=yes toegevoegd op het paaltje daar de VRT (o.a. Brandweer) ook gebruik maakt van OSM.
Er zullen geen reguliere auto routeren door een paaltje.
MVG
eggie
GEOIG (2021-11-29 12:17:50+00:00): Added POI, based on official site https://www.toyota.fr/reseau/00CD2-D0100-06965-47400-01260-1
Frans S (2021-11-29 13:19:36+00:00): Hello
Please pay more attention on accurate and square mapping.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114359481
rthik007 (2021-11-30 08:04:51+00:00): "Hi Annisa Iftinah Hasan,
I have removed the duplicate way as it is overlapping the residential highway
way 1007334880
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114391032.
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114359604
Mordechai23 (2021-11-29 13:02:29+00:00): nie - droga primary to droga łącząca większe miasta w kraju. Powstańców nie jest drogą o znaczeniu tranzytowym, tylko wlotówką do centrum
VroclavianDBRHP83 (2021-11-29 13:33:46+00:00): a drugorzędna chociaż? (z podwalem by było dojście do legnickiej) 
a dawna 341 Brzeg Dolny - Prawików i Droga Powiatowa Brzeg Dolny-Wołów mają spory ruch tirów. więc powinny być drogami drugorzędnymi.
Frans S (2021-11-29 13:16:25+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
A remark about mapping roads.
When buildings are close to a passing road, and in short distance of it, it is not necessary to map a road (service or residential) to it.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114359979
eggie (2021-11-29 13:10:55+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... Adressen zijn uniek 
Nummer 12 is al in gebruik op het pand er naast (zuidzijde)  Je zou die adresnode kunnen gebruiken.
Bedrijven niet toeveoegen in OSM op de gebouw omtrek maar op een (adres) node.
Ik zet even de hele riedel op een node.. dan zelf even kijken hoe je dat adres oplost. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-29 13:14:28+00:00): Oke, maar dan moet de bedrijfsinfo naar een node. Dus geen adres op het gebouw. Die hoogte e.d is verder prima.
Ook nog even office=company toevoegen voor de juiste rendering.. en evt website= .... phone= +31.....
eggie (2021-11-29 13:17:42+00:00): Voor opening_hours=   kun je deze 'tool'gebruiken
 

openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/

Mapse
eggie
eggie (2021-11-29 14:44:41+00:00): Info naar node verplaatst
MVG
eggie
otwar (2021-12-01 08:49:00+00:00): Главный ход Октябрьской железной дороги (Санкт-Петербург - Москва) является скоростной линией.  Уберите тэг highspeed='yes' на 'no'
iiputilo (2021-12-01 11:37:02+00:00): А почему он по вашему не высокоскоростной? На большей части главного хода скоростные ограничения 200-220. Если брать информацию из wikipedia( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_rail ), на которую ссылается OSM, то высокоскоростной линией можно считать Главный ход Октябрьской ж/д. Цитата: "While there is no single standard that applies worldwide, lines built to handle speeds in excess of 250 km/h (155 mph) and upgraded lines in excess of 200 km/h (124 mph) are widely considered to be high-speed." Также прикладываю ссылку на карту высокоскоростных железных дорог Европы( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-speed_rail#/media/File:High_Speed_Railroad_Map_of_Europe.svg )
otwar (2021-12-01 12:13:50+00:00): Технически да. Большая часть линии соответствует определению "существующая модернизированная (скорость 200 км/ч и более)", но позиция российского OSM сообщества решило трактовать Главных ход скоростной линией

Чат:  https://t.me/ruosm
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-14 12:10:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4968558394/history#map=19/52.33217/21.11297

Czy dodanie not:brand:wikidata=Q2589061 bez usunięcia brand:wikidata=Q2589061 było zamierzone?
nadol (2022-10-14 12:28:09+00:00): Mój błąd
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-14 12:40:46+00:00): to poprawisz na wersję którą miała być?
Dimitar155 (2021-12-04 13:47:58+00:00): Hello Nutchaya Hongvilai,

Thank you for doing this work, but please download the area before editing. The roads you've realigned are currently crossing parks and buildings. You can use Esri World Clarity Imagery since it has a lot more details and it is very well aligned.

Regards,
Dimitar
nutchayahongvilai (2021-12-07 18:32:51+00:00): Thank you for your comment. I am working on moving roads to better align with correct imagery and traces such as Strava. I moved the buildings to better match imagery so they are not overlapping the roads.
scai (2022-09-21 10:13:15+00:00): Hallo Stephan_HAL,

durch diese Änderung existieren diverse POIs nun doppelt in der Karte, einmal als separater Punkt (wie bisher) und einmal als Tags am Gebäude (das ist neu). Das betrifft mindestens Cafe Sonnendeck, Il Gelato und Hafenmeister & Docks. Ich werde die Tags am Gebäude daher entsprechend entfernen (amenity=cafe, amenity=ice_cream, tourism=hotel etc.). Andernfalls würden diese POIs sowohl in der Karte mehrfach angezeigt als auch in Suchfunktionen mehrfach gefunden werden, das ist nicht korrekt.

Grüße
Alex
Frans S (2021-11-29 15:20:02+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114362360
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:39:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
Moerland (2021-11-29 14:06:56+00:00): De schuur in de tuin bestaat nog wel, klein foutje.
eggie (2021-11-29 14:36:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-29 14:40:11+00:00): De schuur heb ik teruggeplaatst.
Mapse
eggie
Moerland (2021-11-29 14:44:24+00:00): Dank! Ik ga de pagina later even bekijken. Ben bezig met een inventarisatie van de objecten in dit gebied, dus kwam dit ineens tegen.
felipeeugenio (2021-11-29 17:08:02+00:00): Hola Wladimir.
Las estructuras puedes cuadrarlas con la letra Q. dejaste varios poligonos bastante irregulares y dudo que tengan esa forma. En un rato los arreglo.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114363312
Frans S (2021-11-29 15:12:20+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped despite the poor quality of the imagery. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key (you missed 6 buildings)
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114363646
mueschel (2021-11-30 14:13:51+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!

These objects got some tags like "  中南地信2101 = 8211210113". 

This might be a good description of the object,
but is not usable in OSM - no software can understand
it. Please have a look at the wiki about common
tags for shops or amenities.
Let us know in case you need help!

Jan
ivanbranco (2021-12-17 20:15:58+00:00): Since 18 days passed without any activity from the user, I cleaned up such tags, feel free to add them again with proper tagging if you want to
czubi (2021-12-10 14:46:14+00:00): Stadilm -> Stadtilm. Habs eingebessert
felipeeugenio (2021-11-29 17:12:55+00:00): Buena. buen nivel de detalle. saludos
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114363790
joost schouppe (2021-11-29 14:31:47+00:00): also imrpoved some geometry and  improved tagging of the Baerdemakerstraat
RicoElectrico (2022-01-19 23:24:21+00:00): Cześć, ta droga przypadkiem Ci się skasowała? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3016825
eggie (2022-01-06 20:18:58+00:00): Oke, maar dan is het dus een cycleway=shared_lane 
Fietssuggestiestrook..  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:cycleway%3Dshared_lane
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-01-06 20:20:14+00:00): Pas je het aan..cycleway=shared_lane? Het is meer een verkeersremmende maatregel. De weg lijkt dan smaller.
eggie (2022-01-11 09:10:40+00:00): cycleway=shared_lane weer toegevoegd.. Beter niet verwijderen svp.
Het is een legitieme tag. 
MVG
eggie
TauvicR (2022-01-12 08:08:27+00:00): Bedankt weer wat geleerd
eggie (2021-12-01 09:08:26+00:00): Dag Tim...  
Lijkt me oke...  

Een school kun je het beste toevoegen aan de adresnode. 
Ik zal het even aanpassen.



Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114364810

MVG
eggie
TimuitWormer (2021-12-01 12:37:14+00:00): Beste Eggie,
bedankt voor de feedback, weer wat geleerd!
Tim
MxxCon (2021-11-30 01:24:44+00:00): Hello.
Should this be "note" or "description" field?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114364897
mbeyerle (2021-11-30 19:39:43+00:00): description is probably better - updating this to incorporate that suggestion
Frans S (2021-11-29 15:22:46+00:00): Hello. 
Please read the comments which has been send to you about your mapping quality.
Please improve them !!
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114364921
EP_Repair (2021-12-16 07:40:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114990646 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging, unconventional, and fictious golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000109 at Baker Park
Frans S (2021-11-29 15:31:17+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. (Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key).
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114365156
Frans S (2021-11-29 15:39:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 

You forgot to tag the buildings.
Normally they should be mapped as building=yes
but here , because there is no roof, you see the walls, you can tag it as building=construction. 
I changed it for you
Please dont add simple points tagged as wood.
These areas are no part of this project,
Because these span a great area, it makes no sence to map them in a task square.
Best regards and keep mapping



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114365713
Robertbatam (2021-12-04 07:27:50+00:00): very luxurious
Frans S (2021-11-29 15:34:43+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 

The Imagery is not that clear, but I see actually 2 buildings next to eachother. so you should have mapped 2 buildings here instead of 1 bigger one.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114365866
abakus_uploader (2021-11-29 23:30:56+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
streckenkundler (2021-11-29 20:56:48+00:00): Ich hab mir fast gedacht, daß du mir zuvor kommst... :D

Ich habe das NSG aber noch weiter rückgebaut... ein MP ist hier für mich zu 100% unnötig... MP's mit mehr als 1 Outer und deutlich weniger als 2000 Stützpunkten sind immer obsolet... Daher hab ich das auf eine simple einfache geschlossene Linie reduziert. 
iD hat hier anscheinend seit langem ein Bug. Wenn bestimmte Linien miteinander verklebt sind: Straßen mit landuse oder Grenzen; und man teilt z.B. die Straße, wird auch das andere verklebte geteilt... vermute ich...

Nun gut...

Viele Grüße,

Sven
MarcoR (2021-11-30 13:50:36+00:00): Ciao! Il tag "name" va usato solo per il nome proprio quando questo è conosciuto. Se non lo conosci, puoi indicare il problema agli altri mappatori usando un tag a scelta tra fixme, description e note.

Non ti preoccupare troppo: si tratta di uno degli "errori" più frequenti anche tra i mappatori più esperti. Per maggiori informazioni: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Nomi#Il_nome_.C3.A8_unicamente_il_nome

A presto,
Marco
TheBestIdea (2022-02-22 15:36:05+00:00): Hi Abask,
The bike lane running between Port Jeff and East Setauket on Main St/ W Broadway is just a painted lane with no physical segregation from car lanes so it needs to be mapped with cycleway=lane tag on main way instead of separate way with highway=cycleway. 
For more info see the wikipage for cycleways https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway
Let me know if you have any questions!
Good mapping,
Brandon