piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_5359 (2022-01-10 16:29:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019868141. What ist the meaning of the key DATA and MOD?

Здравствуйте! Посмотрите, пожалуйста, на сайте https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019868141. Каково значение ключей DATA и MOD?
gszkr (2022-02-24 15:04:04+00:00): Skąd pomysł na przekwalifikowanie ścieżek na Zakrzówku na pedestrian, czyli wg definicji "DUŻYCH, utwardzonych, powierzchni, głównie deptaki i place, przewidzianych tylko dla pieszych."?
kubahahaha (2022-02-24 15:19:56+00:00): Byłeś tam ostatnio? Teraz to są asfaltowe szerokie prawie ulice. W ten sposób chciałem je zaznaczyć, a jako path te kamieniste poplątane, które robią aktualnie
kubahahaha (2022-03-07 11:08:33+00:00): Dokładnie tak to wygląda
https://imgur.com/a/n1aiaSw
gszkr (2022-04-06 13:58:05+00:00): Umknął mi komentarz - więc owszem, byłem i to nie raz - co widać choćby po notatce: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3063855
I według mnie nie różni się to niczym od ścieżek spacerowych w innych parkach. Ale jednak nikt ich nie zmienia na "deptaki" tylko dlatego, że mają 2,5m (a czasami więcej) szerokości.
kubahahaha (2022-04-06 14:18:56+00:00): Na Zakrzówku powstaje teraz cała masa wąskich ścieżek z kamienia - stromych, poprowadzonych w trudno dostępne miejsca.
Takim targowaniem chciałem zaznaczyć główne, płaskie, szerokie alejki. Już wcześniej była tak oznaczona Aleja Elvisa Presleya, ja rozciagnalem to szerzej.
Jak skończy się przebudowa chciałem tak samo oznaczyć łącznik od końca ul. Twardowskiego do al. Elvisa Presleya.

Parki w Krakowie faktycznie nie są tak oznaczane, ale np. w Poznaniu jest zupełnie inaczej, znalazłem jeszcze na szybko park Skaryszewski w Warszawie i Park Śląski w Chorzowie gdzie część alejek jest tak wyróżniona.

Tutaj z tego oznaczenia widzę też korzyść dla np. służb ratowniczych - tylko po tych ścieżkach mogą poruszać się pojazdy.
gszkr (2022-04-06 16:29:18+00:00): To, że Aleja Elwisa Presleya była oznaczona jako deptak nie znaczy automatycznie, że było to dobre oznaczenie. Co do reszty w odniesieniu do pozostałych ścieżek: od określenia nawierzchni jest tag surface, od określenia szerokości jest tag width. Jest też tag incline do oznaczania spadku albo ogólnie, albo dokładnie. 
Co do przykładów - tak, w Chorzowie "część alejek" zasługuje na takie oznaczenie (i tak, mówię na podstawie wizyty trzy miesiące temu). Podobnie w Krakowie np. główna alejka wiodąca łukiem od fontanny w Parku lotników zasługiwałaby na takie oznaczenie - bo jest faktycznie wyjątkowo szeroka. Mogę się zgodzić, że główna alejka wiodąca w Lesie Wolskim z Bielan pod Kopiec Piłsudskiego to też deptak, ale już Aleja Wędrowników czy z drugiej strony zoo moim zdaniem nie za bardzo. A tu są to zwykłe alejki tyle tylko, że o nawierzchni asfaltowej. Nie są ani duże, ani szerokie. Prędzej zasługują na highway:track (zgadza się z przykładami prawidłowego zastosowania, np. a forest road used for outdoor recreation) niż pedestrian.
kubahahaha (2022-04-06 17:50:58+00:00): Nie no, track to na 100% nie, tutaj to path albo pedestrian.
Tagów incline i width nikt nie wypełni teraz, na wspomnianym połączeniu Twardowskiego - Presleya surface też chyba będzie nieutwardzone - a uważam że jednak te alejki które są teraz pedestrian powinny być wyróżnione.
Jak dla mnie 50/50, przy połączeniu tej drogi z Norymberską ma być chyba parking + toalety, może wtedy jej funkcja wzrośnie bardziej na pedestrian. Nie wiem też jakie będzie oznakowanie dla rowerów
kubahahaha (2022-04-06 22:48:35+00:00): Jak chcesz to możemy się kiedyś zdzwonić na jakimś komunikatorze w tym temacie, ja sam nie jestem na 100% przekonany do swojej wersji, ale uważam to za jakiś kompromis między dokładnością, a użytecznością.
Pisz na priv jeśli uważasz to za potrzebne, albo linkuj jeśli chcesz gdzieś przenosić dyskusję, sam jestem otwarty na poprawki i nie będę bronił tej edycji do ostatniej kropli krwi :p
LordGarySugar (2022-01-12 00:34:56+00:00): This footpath is shown on the Herts Public Rights of Way Map (https://webmaps.hertfordshire.gov.uk/row/row.htm) - is there any information to the contrary apart from the anonymous note?
RedAuburn (2022-01-12 14:18:22+00:00): ah you're right, sorry about that. i'll revert the removal 👍
LordGarySugar (2022-01-12 16:28:58+00:00): No problem, hopefully at some point in the future all the public footpaths will be tagged with prow_ref to prevent confusion :)
clay_c (2022-04-21 13:03:35+00:00): Hi there—I noticed you retagged the station building as a train station here. When mapped as an area, railway=station is meant to cover the entire station grounds, including platforms. Baltimore Camden Station is currently mapped as a node, which is also acceptable. Station buildings should be building=train_station, without railway=station.

I went ahead and fixed this here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120000388
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-04-21 18:01:06+00:00): Thanks for the heads up, I hadn't realized the distinction - I don't remember if I had a specific reason for using railway=station but the logic of the building=railway_station tag does make more sense
pkoby (2022-01-20 21:36:15+00:00): Is the Seton Court outline supposed to be tagged as building=university? I see it also has layer=-1. I'm not too familiar with the area, but I don't think there's a building under all this?
DUGA (2023-01-29 21:52:35+00:00): I have no idea where these data come from, some of them are incorrect.
yamanq (2022-01-19 01:38:59+00:00): Hi IanH, thanks for all your work in the area. Why did you map the playground in Southeast Area Park as 2 multipolygon relations? Wouldn't it be better as a single area or at most 1 relation?
ravali_78 (2022-01-12 08:48:23+00:00): Hi Trần Quốc Nhật,
Trust you are doing well and Welcome to OpenStreetMap! While mapping the Vietnam we have observed that "amenity=restaurant","amenity=place_of_worship"polygons are created on the waterways and "railway=rail" were created in open space refer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:railway.
 And the geometry of the amenity , railway does not seem to reflect on the ground reality and this should be avoided mapping on OpenStreetMap. We are reverting these changesets and please do not hesitate to reach out to us for any questions.
Please visit the OSM beginner’s guide/learn OSM to learn best mapping practices. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide , https://learnosm.org/.
Happie Mapping!
Ravalika Vallem.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115964514
user_5359 (2022-01-11 17:06:11+00:00): Hello! Please have look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9406595962. What is the meaning of the tag phoneAU = 1800 603 503 ? Please use the international phone number (with country code).
Fizzie-DWG (2022-01-11 21:45:53+00:00): Sorry, typo - should be phone:AU, These are Australian only numbers that cannot be called from overseas: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines#13.2C_1300.2C_1800_and_1900_numbers
catonano (2022-01-10 06:07:46+00:00): excuse me, I'm not sure what you did here
KVI0n (2022-01-10 06:26:42+00:00): Hi! Here I connected the points of the roads to one point, because the road (highway = residential Via Di Palma) was not connected by a common point with the Via Crispi road.
catonano (2022-01-10 10:01:32+00:00): Aahhh I see !

Thanks then :-)
Glassman (2022-01-10 17:07:58+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good. One suggestion. Rather than delete the existing lake, just retag and modify the geometry. That preserves the history of the object.  

I don't know about the City of Kent licensing, but King County data is typically public domain.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115966569
Enock4seth (2022-01-11 00:51:11+00:00): Hi, 
`building:levels` and `building:levels:underground` shouldn't be added with value `0`. I have restored `building:levels` to 1 and removed underground
Adababu Godswill (2022-01-11 13:00:42+00:00): Hi Enock,
Thank for the feedback, but I thought the tag (building:level=1) is use for buildings that have ground floor and first floor.

I'm open for further education on it.

Best Regards.
literan (2022-01-10 16:37:58+00:00): не надо ОРАТЬ
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-01-12 23:29:50+00:00): e voce continua com essa má pratica de ficar mapeando vias totalmente fora da geometria dos elementos, isso não ajuda, atrapalha o mapa... as coisas tem que estar minimamente  bem desenhadas. exemplo aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9406701997
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-01-13 13:13:15+00:00): ok, deletei as partes que estavam muito fora da geometria real, voce esta perdendo seu tempo e o nosso fazendo isso.
Enock4seth (2022-01-11 00:45:35+00:00): this bus station has internet access? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5126547837 you want to add more details on acess?
Adababu Godswill (2022-01-11 13:09:18+00:00): By internet access I mean you can use the internet when find yourself in that area. Because there are certain places in Ghana that don't have access to the internet.
Enock4seth (2022-01-11 13:58:37+00:00): Thanks for the clarification, unfortunately that's not the purpose of `internet_access` tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:internet%20access
Enock4seth (2022-02-23 05:49:00+00:00): The tunnel should be applied to only section of river that crosses the road, see here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034367929#map=19/6.19740/-2.37487
nevw (2022-01-10 08:40:15+00:00): Hi
all this seems like fantasy mapping.
I am not local to the area but none of it seems to resemble the real situation in the area from imagery that I can access.
Do you realise this is a real world map?
Would you time be better spent editing this fantasy map?
https://opengeofiction.net/#map=3/29.69/72.77&layers=B
Should I revert all your mapping to restore the area to how it is in real life or has this area been completely rebuilt into something new and unexpected and your mapping reflects the current situation?
BlueMM (2022-01-11 00:43:26+00:00): @nevw I concur, a few weeks ago I drove past and I'm sure all the newish apartments are still there. These changes appear to not reflect reality.
Warin61 (2022-01-11 02:21:25+00:00): Changesets have been reverted. 
Data deleted from past. I suspect some data has been dragged in the distant past to this location and then the new mapper has 'played with it'.
nevw (2022-01-11 03:13:57+00:00): Thanks
I reported to the DWG as all the edits here, including some under a different name are spurious.
Warin61 (2022-01-12 02:28:15+00:00): Probable pokemon.
nevw (2022-01-10 12:59:48+00:00): Hi
I think the wiki is quite specific in that you should be using multipolygons instead of boundary relations for such natural areas. 
As you seem to disagree with this premise I think you should raise the issue on the talk mailing list so that it can be discussed and sorted out. There maybe no consensus on the issue I expect, but it is worth having discussing due to the large amount of mapping you are doing and the fact that others predominantly map differently.
I don’t know how rendering or other processing is affected but it may be I guess.
It is certainly an interesting topic to discuss with the community.
TobyOrr (2022-03-18 01:24:37+00:00): Thanks for your feedback.

I have just become aware that, for quite a few months, my email account has been sending emails from OpenStreetMap directly to spam because of a large number of dubious ladies seeking my friendship via the OpenStreetMap message system.

I want to reassure you and the other people who messaged me or left changeset comments that I was not deliberately ignoring messages - I was just unaware that they were being trashed as spam. I have now changed account settings regarding mail from OpenStreeMap.
渤海西岸 (2022-01-10 09:01:46+00:00): Why delete the area = yes?
rza31 (2022-01-23 22:34:50+00:00): area=yes is recognised as an unnecessary feature in JOSM.
The automatic repair/deletion is offered by JOSM.
rthik007 (2022-01-11 06:29:49+00:00): "HI maxim kendari,
I have changed the classification of road 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/rthik007.
Thank you"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115969258
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
puma515 (2022-01-10 15:18:18+00:00): Danke für den wiki link. Nun weiß ich wie man die Biogasanlagen vernünftig eintragen kann werde gleich alle weiteren von mir erstellte anlagen anpassen.
puma515 (2022-01-10 15:46:22+00:00): Habe den Firmennamen an der 1 Anlange geändert da das in Poyenberg 2 unterschiedliche betreiber sind. 
noch ein tipp: die telefonummern werdenin osm im internationallem standart gemappt. Das heist für Deutschland+49 davor schreiben und die null weglassen
Findus63 (2022-01-10 19:13:31+00:00): Danke für deinen Kommentar. Das scheinen nicht alle Poyenberger zu wissen, denn ich hatte aufgeschnappt dass beide Anlagen von Jens Gerstandt betrieben werden.
Tel.Nr. = international hatte ich übersehen. Danke und schön dass Du gegengeprüft hast. :-)
puma515 (2022-01-10 20:13:37+00:00): Da ich den Ganzen Naturpark Aukrug überarbeite guck ich auch immer mal nach was in dem bereich sonst noch so bearbeitet wird :-)
Kenn mich hier natürlich nicht persönlich mit den Betriebstrukturen aus. Habe aber als ich Poyenberg biogas im web gesucht habe die 2 Firma gefunden und laut impressum gehört die eine zu der anlage am Silzener weg.

Sind wohl 2 Firmen aber die
Poyenberger Dorf Info ist auch richtig da im impressum zu lesen ist das Jens Gerstandt mit dran beteiligt ist.
laurent-38 (2022-01-10 11:36:40+00:00): Bonjour Roskoo,

Merci pour cette mise à jour.
J'ai recréé le relais poste commerçant chez le buraliste, il y avait une erreur de position auparavant. (cf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115977668)

Peux-tu confirmer que les bâtiments qui hébergeaient la poste et les pompiers ont été détruits ? Et le cas échéant, les supprimer dans OpentStreetMap ?

Cordialement
~~
Laurent
Roskoo (2022-01-10 13:13:51+00:00): Bonjour Laurent, 

Oui je vous confirme que ces bâtiments ont été supprimées il y'a 3/4 ans a peu près. Pour construire la nouvelle mairie qui est déjà en construction et qui aura fini de construire dans 1/2 ans. 

Cordialement 
Ronan
laurent-38 (2022-01-10 14:04:00+00:00): Ok, 
J'ai rajouté quelques éléments concernant ces travaux : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115983309.

N'hésitez pas à corriger si nécessaire.

~~
laurent
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
Supaplex (2022-01-11 03:25:55+00:00): https://www.megabank.com.tw/about/announcement/public/public-detail?sno=%7B89A6106D-7B65-4FF2-AEBA-4FB7CF1F71C8%7D
紲去林仔口變成林仔口分行
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/115970435
Supaplex (2022-01-11 05:24:01+00:00): 紲->徙
aweech (2022-01-10 14:51:52+00:00): Hi,
In OpenStreetMap, we title-case street names. So the road that you labeled "OAKHILL Road" is properly spelled "Oakhill Road", how it was before you changed it.
shrayans (2022-01-11 12:15:15+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the mistake.
Apologies for editing the road name in upper-case letters, It's an honest mistake from my end.
Going ahead, I'll ensure to avoid making such errors.
Thanks once again for fixing the edit, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
shrayans
Filip009 (2022-01-11 09:40:28+00:00): Dobrý deň, mohli by ste si prosím skontrolovať tento changeset? Je tam veľa duplicitných ciest. Tie predchádzajúce boli pridané https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115875011 
napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019051034 a https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1019938260
PavolG (2022-01-11 10:05:42+00:00): Hmm, nieco zjavne zblblo... Idem sa na to pozriet. 
Restartlo mi PC a potom vybehli konflikty, ale pomazal som to. Zjavne nepomohlo
francians (2022-01-11 19:30:17+00:00): Ciao,

Grazie per i fix. Nota che "le funze" (f maiuscola?) non hanno ancora un tag che indica di cosa si tratta, forse intendevi:
natural=peak

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dpeak

Francesco
literan (2022-01-10 16:36:55+00:00): приветствую! sidewalk (тротуар) это пешеходная дорожка вдоль автодороги. Так что здесь не везде эти теги расставлены корректно
Руслан Т (2022-01-10 18:04:35+00:00): Привет! 
Исправил)
Спасибо=)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-02-04 05:20:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 116986772, 116973878, 116976578, 116979036, 116983082, 116959113, 116985873, 116987926, 116984402, 116970935, 116981234, 116967980 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some fantasy mapping.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.  See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=14729412 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5642 .
NiLaKol (2022-01-10 13:06:49+00:00): Hey, why did you delete this access tag?
Jorisbo (2022-01-10 13:13:45+00:00): Hi NiLaKol, the access tag is used for automated routing purposes. The value ff seems pretty odd and is not recognisable as a "yes or no" for certain groups of vehicles or people.  However there is no such thing as bad values, a regular value would be something like yes,no,permissive,private,students, customers. Since it was 'yes' previously and yes is also the default i removed the "ff" . Kind regards, Joris
NiLaKol (2022-01-10 14:34:08+00:00): Adjacent to the parking space, there is a building called "FF Löschgruppe Linzenich - Lövenich". "ff" is an abbreviation for "Freiwillige Feuerwehr", the volunteer fire department. I asume this parking space is for the volunteers or for emergency purpose and not for the public. Since I don't know if 'permit', 'private' or 'no' fits better, or even if my assumptions are wrong, I would recommend changing it back to ff and maybe adding a fixme, so that a person can check the situation on the ground.

So, please don't delete any tags without investigate the situation. Please take the time to figure out what happend, instead of making a "logical" guess.
acubens71 (2022-01-10 14:59:21+00:00): Hello,
Ce changement de direction du cours d'eau m'étonne beaucoup. Cela voudrait dire que la Seillette coule de l'aval vers l'amont, ce qui me semble très improbable.

Cdlt,
Julien39 (2022-01-12 12:55:27+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour la remarque, j'en ai oublié un morceau apparemment et je n'ai pas vu de message d'alerte au moment de l'enregistrement !
Ca doit être rentré dans l'ordre à présent :)
map per (2022-01-31 11:28:22+00:00): Hi,
Im not sure but can it be that you accidentally deleted a huge desert? If so reverting this changeset would probably be the easiest way to solve the issue.
Best wishes
map per
philippec (2022-01-14 18:00:04+00:00): Wijnegem zwembad fietsstalling.  Ik heb die op de juiste plaats gezet.  Gelukkig heb je een foto gemaakt zodat  ik het kon verbeteren.  Zie hoe ik het zwembad en de aed verbeterd heb.  Er is nog Mapillary op komst.
Gopnik McBlyat (2022-01-10 13:42:58+00:00): Dear Cineflick,

why haven't you dissolved https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13508242/history ?
Cine_flick (2022-01-11 16:47:59+00:00): Hi Gopnik McBlyat, I have converted the inner role to outer role for the existing relations as per the OSM guidelines. I preferred correcting the role instead of dissolving the relation because it was recently added by another mapper.
adamsc (2022-03-28 21:03:21+00:00): Brak oznakowania, kamienie, piach na asfalcie uniemożliwiające bezpieczną jazdę. Brak mostu (w budowie) nad Utratą. Zmieniam z powrotem na construction.
user_2066394 (2022-01-10 10:02:48+00:00): postal_code nach Bing?
Gehrke (2022-01-10 10:07:37+00:00): Ja, letzlich gibt es ja keine "echten" PLZ-Gebiete, sondern nur Punktwollen der Adressen. Das OSM-PLZ-Gebiet wird dann möglichst sinnvoll so gewählt, dass zukünftige Adressen auch richtig zugeordnet wären - und es logisch und gefällig erscheint.
user_2066394 (2022-01-10 10:10:30+00:00): Die Info wäre top im Changeset-Kommentar :-)
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:44:35+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
danieldegroot2 (2022-03-02 10:32:27+00:00): Hey zemuniwi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I have sent you an extensive welcome message with useful information and links as a private message.

Unfortunately I can't give feedback on all your changes, but the ones I've seen look ok.

Thank you for contributing,

Daniel
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:45:15+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:45:19+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:45:24+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:45:29+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:45:34+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:45:38+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:45:43+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:45:47+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:45:51+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:47:08+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
Patr1k_P (2022-01-11 23:13:37+00:00): Zdravím, ak nemá obec pomenované ulice, tak sa dáva place...napr

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58948405
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:47:14+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:47:19+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:47:25+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:47:30+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 10:47:34+00:00): Source is a mistake. It was mapbox satellite.
windkraft-os (2022-01-13 02:21:05+00:00): Ist das ein Hybridfundament oder ein HST-Fundament? Falls HST, dann ist das eine E-115 EP3 E3
windkraft-os (2022-02-23 19:46:58+00:00): Es ist keine E-115 E2, sondern eine E-115 EP3 E3
https://mlk-windparks.de/.
Habe das korrigiert
jomamoj (2023-04-12 14:16:38+00:00): This changeset also reverts the changes in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107004650 - in my opinion https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146291087 should be tagged as highway=motorway as it is part of the A7 (the rightmost lane is an exit lane for HGVs to the A7).
MKnight (2023-04-12 18:36:14+00:00): Schwierig. Habe es trotzdem (rück)geändert[1].
Ich glaube dass das eher ein Grenzfall ist, wo irgendwie ist beides richtig wäre.

[1] Grund für mein Revert damals war ein anderes Problem, weiss nicht mehr ob ich bewusst abgestuft habe oder übersehen...
jomamoj (2023-04-12 19:20:38+00:00): Danke. Es ist tatsächlich schwierig. Ich würde argumentieren: wenn man in Richtung München fährt, bleibt man die ganze Zeit auf der A 7 und wechselt nicht auf einen Verbindungsweg.

Dementsprechend habe ich auch ref=A 7 hinzugefügt in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134833624