piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
DUGA (2023-01-16 21:41:17+00:00): No such name, reverted.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101383874#map=19/41.64079/-76.09981
DUGA (2022-12-27 15:17:28+00:00): Please avoid adding sources tag.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101384540#map=18/41.71424/-76.10594
DUGA (2022-12-27 15:19:03+00:00): Also, where did you get that it is paved??? Please map with care, you do not appear to have visited that place.
marczoutendijk (2022-10-06 07:53:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6420
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:38:01+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127080570
tlconrd (2022-10-06 05:32:39+00:00): the general plan document is a google drive document of the above link provided. the residential area that I tagged as haiwee is the western portion of the town
catdreamer (2022-10-06 09:29:00+00:00): 在同一棟建物明顯不合哩，又是東海的角落，匯入資料的可靠性要再核對
DUGA (2023-01-15 20:35:12+00:00): No such name, reverted.

Please avoid importing junks to OSM
DUGA (2022-12-05 19:45:06+00:00): Let's avoid spamming sources tag, please put in changeset comments only
DUGA (2023-09-09 14:58:00+00:00): Also, this is not a pipeline substation.

If you do not live in rural places, don't tag.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101389606#map=17/41.70889/-76.01201
mavl (2023-04-25 09:03:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Mairie de Bayonne (2022-10-06 09:42:50+00:00): salut @Arretche
pour la couleur des bancs, je ne sais pas ce que te propose OSM GO mais ça s'écrit plutôt en anglais (colour=red)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:colour

A bientôt
Arretche (2022-10-06 11:36:12+00:00): Salut,
Effectivement OSM Go m'a laissé libre de mettre ce que je voulais alors que les autres tag venaient d'une liste de choix fermée. J'ai fais exprès de mettre en français pour voir s'il allais le convertir mais il semble que non.
opendcc (2022-10-06 06:35:46+00:00): Guten Morgen und willkommen auf OpenStreetMap. 
Ich möchte Sie darauf hinweisen, dass OpenStreetMap eine Datenbank primär für die Navigation ist und wir uns beim Eintrag da an als sinnvoll empfundene Regeln halten: Dazu gehört zum einen ein zurückhaltener Umgang mit Großschreibung (Großschreibung gilt als 'Gebrüll'), zum anderen eine möglichst knappe Formulierung. Hier würde ich dazu raten, den vollen Firmenname in das Tag official_name zu legen und den name bei HABA-Beton belassen.  (Beispiel: zum Einkaufen gehen man ja auch zu Aldi und nicht zu ALDI SÜD Dienstleistungs-SE & Co. oHG).
Sollten Sie Fragen haben - gerne.

Viele Grüße
(PS: ich habe bei meinem Haus auch Ihre Ringe drin ...)
opendcc (2022-10-06 06:37:26+00:00): PPS: der Vorteil an kürzeren Namen: er bleibt auch bei größeren Kartenausschnitt länger sichtbar, weil ihn der Renderer unterbringen kann. Sehr lange Texte bringt er dann nicht mehr in die Graphik rein.
HABABETON (2022-10-06 07:14:51+00:00): Guten Morgen, 

wir haben Ihre vorgeschlagene Änderungen übernommen. 

Vielen Dank. 

Viele Grüße
opendcc (2022-10-06 11:37:51+00:00): Hier noch ein Beispiel einer Datenbankabfrage, die nach HABA-Beton sucht: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1mvl
Damit bekommen Sie Ihre Standorte. Das Ergebnis einer solchen Abfrage kann man als Overlay zu einer Karte laden, z.B. für 'Sie finden uns hier'.
Baloo Uriza (2022-10-06 22:10:42+00:00): I updated the tags on this to match tagging a little more typical of the rest of the map based on the information available.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127082395
jmsbert (2022-12-14 00:10:01+00:00): Hallo Rene, vielen Dank für die Überarbeitung der Positionen der Firmen Siemers und Team Funke. Da zusätzlich an an dieser Stelle ein Fehlerhinweis platziert war [1], habe ich dies zum Anlass genommen noch einmal genauer zu schauen. Da ich nur selten in Twistringen bin, bitte um Rückmeldung, ob nun alles korrekt ist.
Mit "Lager" meintest Du sicherlich das Gebäude [2], oder? Dieses habe ich nun mit entsprechenden Tags versehen, Hauptsitz des Unternehmens ist jedoch Osterkamp 3. Dort sind nun alle relevanten Kontaktdetails platziert.
Gleiches gilt für Elektro Siemers, die nun in die Bremer Str. 71 umgezogen sind.
Passt das so? Gruß aus Cloppenburg

Ansonsten gerne weiter zu OSM beitragen wenn immer irgendetwas auffällt, bei Fragen gerne melden!



[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3124010
[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/307791302
BaghdadiMapper (2023-05-05 06:47:40+00:00): Hi, what source did you use to add the embassy of Mauritania here? According to the website it's in Hay Al-Mansour 
https://www.diplomatie.gov.mr/ar/node/140
Also, the embassies of Bulgaria and Sudan appear to not be here
https://www.mfa.bg/en/embassies/iraq
https://www.embassypages.com/sudan-embassy-baghdad-iraq
LockOnGuy (2023-05-05 07:02:49+00:00): Hello Baghdadi Mapper, this changeset is 7 month old and if you think the embassies had moved to new locations feel free to edit the map. 
Keep in mind the embassies websites do not always share the right information and addresses, for example the Turkish embassy in their website they say the address in Karadat Maryam but it’s still in Wazyria on the ground and the Karadat Maryam location is not yet open. http://baghdad.emb.mfa.gov.tr/Mission/Contact
Marek-M (2022-10-06 09:50:10+00:00): Cześć. Dzięki za aktualizację mapy. Droga, którą dodałeś mimo tego, ze wygląda na polną (highway=track), to jednak jest drogą dojazdową (highway=service). W OSM staramy się mapować drogi zgodnie z ich funkcją. Jakość nawierzchni określa się dodatkowymi tagami: surface+smoothness.

Już poprawiłem tą dodaną przez Ciebie drogę.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127083311
Владимир К (2022-10-23 16:06:54+00:00): Добрый день!
Не нужно указывать дату начала работы УК, только название. цвет указыватся кодом RGB или названием на английском, не "Обычный" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:roof:colour?uselang=ru

access=yes дефолтное значение, указывать его на каждой пешеходной дорожке не стоит. 

статус https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/43215972 этой дороги менять не следовало. 
можете найти полезные ссылки у меня в профиле.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:35:11+00:00): Hi, just a test edit?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
mavl (2023-05-23 16:46:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: incompatible source.
L'imaginaire (2022-10-06 09:27:04+00:00): 👍
Frans S (2022-10-14 12:57:19+00:00): Hello, I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions. Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date. Most of the traces of roads in rural areas needs to be mapped as track when they only give access to farmland etc. Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger. https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/ https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway ---
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127084135
chl-osm (2022-10-25 14:11:21+00:00): Attention, vous aviez déjà créé un noeud pour cette agence. Je supprime.
rhtb0 (2022-10-06 08:38:53+00:00): Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments - “1” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing
gscholz (2022-10-07 04:39:34+00:00): Hi Marine46400,
I have reverted this changeset as it moved street positions around where no streets are:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127084696

Kind regards
Guido
b-holdet (2026-05-02 06:37:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101404413/history/1

What is the idea behind of having 2 separate ferry lines for the same route and the same ferry?
archie (2026-05-02 08:44:56+00:00): this cs did kill/delete one (1) route. the comment was "duplicated edges". so there wasn't anything added heare.
Allroads (2022-10-13 12:11:25+00:00): http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/NLOSMOK/OSMOKNL.html#map=19.34/51.7385/5.5102/0  

BGT geeft aan dat een stuk Cereslaan heet. Waarschijnlijk vanaf de bocht naar boven.

Later zag ik dat je een melding hebt aangemaakt.
https://verbeterdekaart.kadaster.nl/#?geometry.x=163862.23&geometry.y=416696.62&zoomlevel=12.76

Dat stuk Cereslaan zal wel kloppen maar staat nu niet in OSM, hou jij het in de gaten.
Imergis (2022-10-13 13:27:26+00:00): Ja. Ik heb overigens doorgegeven aan de bronhouder (gem. Oss) dat zij dit ook zelf in OSM kunnen corrigeren als ze willen.
Wulfmorn (2022-10-06 12:02:49+00:00): finns väl inget namn mitt på vägen :)
archie (2022-10-06 12:50:51+00:00): nejj
Wulfmorn (2022-10-06 14:02:19+00:00): :D
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 06:35:26+00:00): Hi, just a test edit?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
woodpeck (2022-10-07 08:45:33+00:00): I have re-set way 772773463 to landuse=military. It is apparently an Indian installation but vishal22 has made an attempt to hide that information. Maybe we need an operator tag for that?
lefuturiste (2023-06-02 16:54:45+00:00): je comprend totalement la nature de la modification mais bon je vais la supprimer car c'est un peu évident w)
lefuturiste (2023-06-02 16:55:16+00:00): Quoi que ça peut faire easter egg
giubar (2024-07-26 13:41:16+00:00): Ciao all'inizio di questo percorso c'è una sbarra. Accanto alla sbarra c'è un passaggio per pedoni. Credo che in questa situazione e non essendoci cartelli non possa essere classificata come un percorso ciclopedonale, ma credo fosse più corretto lasciarla "track". Cosa ne pensate?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:11:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
See my comment on changeset 12742992 which also applies here. 
Please pay attention to next points as well:
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127087855
Topato (2022-10-07 14:20:11+00:00): Thanks a ton for the feedback. Very new to mapping and wasn't aware that buildings should never share nodes under any circumstances, even if they seem to share a wall. Will follow that in the future. Thanks!
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:24:31+00:00): What a quick response !
When it is obvious that buildings are terraced buildings. you can connect them. Otherwise, we assume every roof is a separate building.
Best regards
Topato (2022-10-07 14:30:14+00:00): Could say the same thing about the quick response! Then one followup-question: By "every roof", do you mean "every individual roof texture", or every connected building? My best guess so far has been that especially in this mapping area there are the larger rectangular plots and within them there are different amounts of individual buildings (1 - 5 or so). However, sometimes there are buildings that look very much connected, i.e. L-shaped buildings on the same plot of land and sharing the same shadow contour but have two or three roof textures (ie. bright and dark). Would you suggest mapping them as one L-shaped building or as three distinct squares? Couldn't find clear guidance on that and have spotted many cases where only the bright square was mapped while there was obviously a bigger (usually darker) building around it.
Frans S (2022-10-07 14:37:46+00:00): Hi.  Use common sense.
Often it is difficult to see on an Imagery if they are under 1 roof. 
f.i When you map warehouses, which are often built with several connected roofs, you can map these as 1 building if nothing shows that they are isolated.
Under validators, there is also not always consensus. 
Best regards
Topato (2022-10-07 14:39:02+00:00): Perfect, I can go with that. Thanks a ton for your feedback, have a nice day!
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-10-06 08:16:27+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=44.590510%2C2.358350%2C17.75
Agaric (2022-10-06 08:21:24+00:00): Il y a une discordance au niveau du nom de la rue: un panneau indique "Rue de Chez Millon" en face de l'Impasse du Quéreux et un panneau indique "Rue chez Millon", à l'entrée du hameau direction Le Got. De l'autre coté (direction Moulin Brun), deux autres panneau indiquent "Rue Chez Millon".
Le Cadastre mise à jour de 2021, indique seulement "rue chez Millon". Et une seule portion de la rue est indiqué. Pour la cadastre de 2021, la Rue chez Millon s'arrête au niveau de l'Impasse du Quéreux. Sur le terrain ce n'est pas le cas (cf paragraphe précédent).
Agaric (2022-10-10 21:31:02+00:00): Nouveau controle sur le terrain:
à l'entrée du croissement avec la D124, il y a un panneau "Rue de Chez Millon"
Cela fait 3 panneaux "Rue Chez Millon "et 3 panneaux "Rue de Chez Millon"
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
user_5359 (2022-11-11 07:35:29+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag id_arturbmoz,fcm = 135
? Did you mean a reference number (key ref)?
Carto'Cité (2022-10-14 15:40:14+00:00): Bonjour Romy G,
À moins qu'il y ai eu des travaux récents, je crois que cette piste (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101417094) est en fait une bande cyclables à double sens (cf .https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=203402338102995).
Je corrige dans ce sens mais si tu as des remarques ou des questions n’hésite pas :)
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-07 23:39:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 127176855 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some satirical vandalism of Kaliningrad
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
VLD549 (2024-03-29 13:36:21+00:00): Hi, could you explain why it should be with lower case instead of capital letter?
 Some sites write it with lower case, some with capital letters. It doesn't seem to matter.

Thank you!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
yawfle (2022-10-06 20:44:23+00:00): Hi! You might want to read the wiki page about the loading dock tag:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dloading_dock

(It should be a node on the building's outline, at the door location, not a land use area.)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-07-09 14:52:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 138299597 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See e.g. https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/66648011 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/133615709 .
Tomas Straupis (2022-10-06 09:18:39+00:00): Nereikia šaligatvių braižyti atskirais vektoriais. Prie 17 namo iš pietų footpath turėtų jungtis su service keliu (kaip ir buvo iki šiol), o šiaurėje iš to paties service išeiti ir skaidytis V raide kaip dabar padaryta.
O kitkas tai lyg ir gerai.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 08:59:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Frans S (2022-10-06 09:40:46+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
None of your mappings are squared.
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key when they are still selected.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127090528
Frans S (2022-10-06 09:36:12+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped accordingly.
Just a remark on 2 mapped buildings. 
1 building shows a shadow which you did not include. Another one is rather oversized. 
See this webpage.  Left side south. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127090551
I corrected these
Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127090551
Dimacn (2022-10-06 17:10:17+00:00): Скажите пожалуйста, почему вы удалили все грунтовые дороги?
Dimacn (2022-11-16 11:01:50+00:00): Я отменил ваш пакет правок, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128983907 К сожалению так и не дождался ответа.
rubasov (2023-03-03 06:03:25+00:00): Időszakos forrásokat nehéz egy bejárás alapján kategorizálni. Úgy gondolom, nem érdemes "disused"-nak jelölni, csak mert egyszer száraz állapotban találtuk. Én többször jártam már ott és néha volt benne víz, máskor pedig nem. Ezt az hiszem, pontosabban írja le az intermittent=yes és a description-ben is meg lehet említeni, hogy időszakos.
bkil (2023-03-03 11:37:13+00:00): Igen, ráadásul a 2022 egy különlegesen aszályos év volt. 2024-ben remélhetőleg újra lesz víz sok "disused" helyen.
user_399857 (2023-03-03 18:53:16+00:00): A history alapján:

1. 8 év alatt senki se jelölte időszakosnak. Te sem. Ha tudtad, hogy az, akkor miért?

2. Több, mint 1 évvel a módosításom előtt került oda megjegyzés, hogy alig van vízhozama. Feltételezhető volt, hogy kiszáradhatott, pláne száraz időkben, és ugye az nem úgy van, hogy száraz időben nem módosítunk, mert mi van, ha véglegesen kiszáradt? Egyébként - bár ez innen nem derül ki, de - egy a környéken aktívkodó ember jelentette be, tucat másik változással illetve állapot megerősítéssel együtt. Szóval amúgy nem "egyszer száraz állapot" miatt történt a módosítás.

Az egyébként örvendetes, ha megint van benne víz, de ez nagyon sok kútnál (közkút, stb) is így van, sőt, van, ahol folyamatosan változik a helyzet. 

Továbbgondolva: ha valahova kikerül egy 30-as korlátozás pl. egy felújítás miatt, azt is feltesszük, aztán ha vége, akkor levesszük, és nem mondjuk azt, hogy ezt nem rakom oda, mert csak ideiglenes, amolyan "egyszer pár napig" állapot.

Aztán vagy jelzi valaki, aki arra jár, és látja, hogy megváltozott a szitu, vagy ha épp te veszed észre, akkor fogod, átszerkeszted, kész. 

Szerintem teljesen felesleges megmagyarázni, hogy miért nem volt jó, ami ott volt, mert nem szórakozásból került oda.