piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gmar5 (2021-04-06 18:25:06+00:00): Hi. Do you have a source for the changed name? The council website uses "Barracks Lane Meadow" (https://www.oxford.gov.uk/directory_record/884/barracks_lane_meadow), which seems to be also commonly used judging from an online search, while "Barracks Lane" is not. Is it perhaps an older form, or do you have more information? Thanks.
gmar5 (2021-04-06 18:26:00+00:00): I meant "Barracks Meadow", in the second quote, sorry.
Tony Brett (2021-04-06 19:48:33+00:00): Well that's interesting because I've always referred to it with Council Officers as "Barracks Meadow" and although I've referred to that web page many times I'm sure it was called Barracks Meadow.  What's interesting on the Council website is that it appears to be two site, the other one being called "Cowley Marsh Nature Park" on the council's boundaries map:

https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer?hl=en&ie=UTF8&msa=0&ll=51.74130708796645%2C-1.2184630978698774&spn=0.00293%2C0.005847&t=h&z=17&mid=16f6rTOlz9fiuUpjbwablf2fHpes
Tony Brett (2021-04-06 19:50:32+00:00): Actually on closer reading that's not right, is it?  It's just the link from the council site shows two boundaries but the Cowley Marsh Nature park is correct.  I'll withdraw my edit if I can.
gmar5 (2021-04-06 20:39:11+00:00): Yeah, that map just includes all nature parks. I also checked that Barracks Lane was already existing with that name when this parcel of land was still part of the larger playing fields. I believe "Barracks Lane Meadow" is the more accurate name. If you think "Barracks Meadow" is also used by people locally (and not just you), we can include it as an "alt_name" tag.
I think the changeset can be reversed, but it's easier to just edit it again.
ottwiz (2021-04-06 16:52:42+00:00): As far as I'm conccerned, I also named some creeks based on the USGS Topo maps
!bm (2021-04-07 21:38:31+00:00): Hallo phgie,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM! 

Vielen Dank für deine Änderungen – beachte bitte, dass einfache highways nicht mit Flächen (landuse, etc. hier: garden) verklebt werden sollten. 

Dies (und ein paar andere Dinge hier) entsprechend korrigiert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102507496

Happy mapping!

--besteGrüße!bm
hrwrth (2021-04-08 08:14:42+00:00): Hallo !bm,
danke dir, gut zu wissen.
Beste Grüße!
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-06 18:31:58+00:00): Laba diena. O čia tikrai būtent „dviračių takas“ su atitinkamu kelio ženklu? Įtariu čia miško keliukas? Jei taip: klausimas ar dviejų vėžių (teoriškai pravažiuojamas mašina) ar vienos - pėsčiųjų/dviračių kelias.
Aurelijus Visagurskis (2021-04-07 12:49:08+00:00): Sveiki, čia ne dviračių takas, o dviračių trasa. Dviračių trasa, nes pagal eksploatacijos intensyvumą, dviračiais čia važiuojama daugiausiai. Vaikšto ir pėsčiomis, pravažiuoja motociklai, keturračiai.
Čia dviejų vėžių miško keliukas, bet automobiliais net grybautojai nesuka į jį, šonuose smarkiai sutankėję krūmai.
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-07 13:43:30+00:00): Supratau, ačiū už info. Tada pakeičiau į highway=track+tracktype=grade5. Dviračių trasa niekaip papildomai nežymima, tai žymėjimas kaip minkščiausios/prasčiausios dangos lauko/miško dviejų vėžių kelias.
AgusQui (2021-04-07 03:18:05+00:00): Hola Fedejru, por favor tené cuidado al unificar ways, estos pueden estar separados por muchas razones, por ejemplos en una calle puede que un tramo sea de asfalto y el otro de concreto, o pueden tener diferentes relaciones. Unificaste los tramos del ex Eje G pero en uno de ellos estan mapeados los colectivos 45 y 143, al unificarlos se rompieron estas relaciones: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4595523#map=17/-34.58218/-58.37852
Por otro lado al actualizar el nombre de una calle es importante dejar el viejo nombre con el tag old_name
Cualquier duda avisame.
guillemmal (2021-04-06 17:32:30+00:00): Estimado Pedro, las paradas que habías eliminado corresponden a la nueva Red Tulum. Por favor, no las elimines. Te invito a unirte al grupo de Telegram de la comunidad argentina https://t.me/osm_ar donde podrás consultar sobre dudas en las ediciones. Saludos!
Guillermo
maraf24 (2021-04-12 08:39:20+00:00): Nieprawda. Nie ma żadnej budowy mostu.
MtGrz (2021-04-12 08:56:01+00:00): Jest, Ośrodek jeździecki "Ranczo na Grobli" został wyburzony i teren jest przygotowywany pod dalsze prace. Na reszcie odcinka odbywa się zaawansowana wycinka drzew lub pierwsze prace ziemne.
maraf24 (2021-04-12 09:02:54+00:00): Nie, nie jest. A wiem to, bo tam byłem. 
Podobnie jest z większością tych "dróg w budowie" tutaj - jest co najwyżej wycinka drzew.
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-07 05:19:53+00:00): Pakeičiau į highway=track ir nuėmiau pavadinimą, nes įtariu šis kelias neturi oficialaus pavadinimo. Lauksiu komentaro, jei spėju neteisingai.
Aurelijus Visagurskis (2021-04-07 13:00:22+00:00): Jei verčiama kaip išvažinėtas kelias, tai tinka, nors jau pradėtas pilti žvirgždas (smulkinta skalda su žvyru, smeliu)
Tomas Straupis (2021-04-07 13:45:25+00:00): Kai jau bus žvirgždas, bus galima pakelti nežymiai klasifikaciją, tracktype=grade3->grade2.
maraf24 (2021-04-12 08:44:26+00:00): Jakie jest źródło, że wszędzie trwają prace?
MtGrz (2021-04-12 09:00:33+00:00): https://www.skyscrapercity.com/threads/dw372-wschodnia-obwodnica-wrocławia-bielany-Łany-długołęka.524573/page-268

Prace obecnie koncentrują się w rejonie węzła w Długołęce i mostu nad Widawą, niemniej prace ziemne są już na większości odcinka.
Strona kontraktu niestety jest źle prowadzona i nie dostarcza wystarczającej informacji o każdym miejscu, ale ze względu na 30% zaawansowania czasowego i 16% zaawansowania robót można przyjąć, że budowa dzieje się na całości odcinka.
maraf24 (2021-04-12 09:09:58+00:00): Wiem, że prace są na większości odcinka, bo widać to na zdjęciach satelitarnych. Ale czy na wszystkich? Mam tu drobne wątpliwości.
I nie, nie przyjmuje sobie w osm, że coś jest w budowie, bo powinno być. O ile to możliwe powinien być odzwierciedlony stan aktualny. Akurat tutaj tak to było zmapowane  przez mnie - na podstawie -prawie- aktualnych  zdjęć.
George McManus (2021-12-16 16:48:50+00:00): Hi Barrakuda18,

have you really checked this landuse on the ground or just mechanically changed its tag?
map per (2021-06-11 06:34:58+00:00): Hallo Strubbl,

weil hier (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8599902440) der Paketshop und der Computerladen ein Laden sind würde ich keine getrennten Nodes einzeichnen, sondern eher post_office=post_partner (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpost_office#.22Postfiliale.22_im_Einzelhandel) verwenden.
(Es gibt dazu eine Node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2626482)

Viele Grüße
map per
Strubbl (2021-06-11 12:05:42+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ja, das können wir gerne so umsetzen. Wie würde man dann noch korrekt taggen, um welche Art Post Partner es sich handelt - also das was im Moment mit name= getaggt ist (DHL, GLS, UPS usw.)

Ich habe das bisher noch öfter so an anderen Orten gemappt, wo ich das dann korrigieren kann.

An Orten, wo die Öffnungszeiten von dem Paketshop von dem eigentlichen Shop abweichen, würde ich zwei separate Nodes belassen (z.B. Ottobrunner Str. OMV Tankstelle mit Hermes). Oder kann man andere Post-Öffnungszeiten auch noch auf dem Shop-Node sinnvoll zusätzlich taggen? 
Der Nachteil wäre dann sicherlich, dass Streetcomplete nicht mehr diese Öffnungszeit auf Aktualität nachfragt bzw. nicht erkennt, dass sie überhaupt noch fehlt. Das könnte man evtl. auch bei Streetcomplete noch als Verbesserung anfragen.

Viele Grüße
map per (2021-06-11 13:39:27+00:00): Hab grad gesehen, dass das Tagging Schema erst Mai diesen Jahres eingeführt wurde. Hatte mich schon gewundert, warum ich das nicht früher gesehen hab. Die Marke kann man mit post_office=brand Tagen und abweichende Öffnungszeiten mit post_office:opening_hours. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:post_office)

Was noch interessant wäre ist was man macht wenn z.B. die Deutsche Post einen Stand in einem Supermarkt hat, und dort eigenes Personal, also nicht das vom Supermark arbeitet. Ist das eine Eigene Node? Bäckereien in einem Supermarkt kriegen ja auch oft eine eigene Node.
map per (2021-06-11 13:43:30+00:00): *post_office:brand=
map per (2021-06-11 15:21:59+00:00): Bei Laden in einem Laden sind zwei Nodes weiterhin richtig (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/shop_as_post-partner#Store_within_a_store)
Strubbl (2021-06-12 22:11:05+00:00): Danke für die Hinweise. Ich habe das mal für Computer Funke und Kiosk Roma so umgesetzt mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106267188
ZeLonewolf (2021-04-09 03:58:06+00:00): Hi, this changeset removed a town boundary for Newtown.  Please try to be a bit more careful working with boundary relations.
user_5359 (2021-04-09 04:36:03+00:00): I actually overlooked the boundary relation in JOSM, that was not my intention. Thanks for the tip and for the repair
ash_win (2021-04-08 12:42:39+00:00): Hi jamielin,
Connected Floating segment to main road and changed classification from unclassified  to foot way as it leading to farm land
kindly check with way 926815123,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102565411
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102422948
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
eggie (2021-04-06 18:12:50+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
eggie (2021-04-06 18:05:05+00:00): Beste Roel.. Dit is absoluut niet correct. Nooit naar de daken kijken. Daar staat het gebouw niet. Het gaat om het maaiveld. Stel je een wolkenkrabber voor en je gaat het dak gebruiken bij een schuingenomen foto.  Dat scheelt vele honderden meters.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-04-06 18:08:19+00:00): Het gebouw heb ik hersteld naar Kadasterdata
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 11:03:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103132090 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
julcnx (2026-06-16 04:00:01+00:00): Hi, some of the ways tagged `surface=clay` in this changeset appear to be laterite roads. `surface=laterite` was approved on 2026-06-15 and describes this surface more precisely. Would you be comfortable retagging? Happy to do it if you prefer. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
aceman444 (2026-06-16 09:35:21+00:00): Hi, thanks for the hint. However I do not agree with the retagging.
1. surface=laterite is a non-tag. At 57 uses worldwide, I do not understand how any such tag could be approved. The proposal page is nicely done, but there is no real-world usage to show where it would be used or how people want to use it. Nobody uses it.
2. surface=clay is the material used on tennis courts, meaning crushed stones or bricks (contains dust but also small parts smaller than fine_gravel). It may be red. However, on the footways in our city, the material looks the same, but is not red, usually pale white. See e.g. https://www.freemap.sk/#map=19/48.156809/17.120886&layers=X~I&image=595574 for an example.
3. It does not get slippery or muddy in rain.
4. Our country is not in tropics.
5. The surface does not crack in dry season (there are even no such wet/dry seasons).

Thus I don't see how laterite applies to the special park footways in this city, when most of the characteristic properties of the material do not apply here. I understand the material may look very similar on first sight.

I don't see why you need to care for the clay footways in Slovakia, when the tag is only used 57 times world-wide. When there are 100 000 uses in proper parts of the world (like half of Africa), then please come back and you can have a case. Thanks.
aceman444 (2026-06-16 10:02:18+00:00): The clay wiki says this:
"Note on terminology: On sports pitches, “clay” is a conventional name for a manufactured crushed-stone surface. On roads and paths it refers to natural clay-rich soil. Both are mapped as surface=clay; the feature type (leisure=pitch vs highway=*) provides the context.

A key characteristic distinguishing surface=clay from surface=dirt is wet-weather behaviour: clay becomes sticky and plastic when wet, making roads difficult or impassable for vehicles."

This seems to be a recent addition from you, which does not cover my usage, however I am open to change as there are very few uses of clay on highways.
I mean a material that resembles tennis court material, but is used on a road. Thus I used surface=clay as that is how the wiki described it (before your changes), although I understand 'clay' is something different as per the wikipedia 'clay' article. But I don't know what would be more correct. 'dirt' is not it, 'ground' is too general. 'laterite' is definitely not it. My case is described at https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/improving-the-wiki-definition-of-surface-clay/141586/21 .
julcnx (2026-06-16 10:06:50+00:00): Sorry, this should have gone to a different changeset, my mistake 😅. On the substance: that 57-use figure is stale, a bot mass-converted surface=laterite away years ago, which is what actually suppressed adoption, not lack of real-world relevance. Since approval it's already past 1000 uses, and I'd expect significant growth as more of the tropics get mapped. For what it's worth, surface=laterite only occurs in the tropics, so you'll never run into it in Europe, rest easy 😉. It just happens to be one of the most common road surfaces across the tropics, easy to miss if you've never set foot there. Happy mapping! 🗺️
aceman444 (2026-06-16 10:11:12+00:00): Ok then, that clears things :) So can you help suggesting a proper material instead of 'clay' for the tennis court material I need?
julcnx (2026-06-16 10:33:17+00:00): Good question, and that actually settles the clay part: real clay tennis courts (crushed brick/shale) do get slippery and waterlogged in heavy rain, low porosity means water pools into mud, that's why tournaments stop play and cover the courts. Since yours doesn't behave that way, clay is ruled out, soil or court material.

For the actual tag, it comes down to firmness: if it shifts loosely underfoot and shows footprints, that's surface=fine_gravel. If it stays firm with the particles locked together, that's surface=compacted.
aceman444 (2026-06-16 10:56:55+00:00): It is loose material, dust with small stone parts (0-5 mm in diameter). You can make holes in it with the foot. It is not compacted. But fine_gravel seems to have grains larger than this, and also the dust component is not so pronounced. The material is not https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Fine_gravel_path_in_Voltino,_Zagreb.jpg , what I need is more like this but even finer grains: https://imgix.obi.de/api/disc/cms/public/dam/DE-AT-Assets/Gartengestaltung/gartenweg-anlegen-und-pflastern-in-7-schritten/Pflasterweg-randsteine-abstuetzen-13.jpg
aceman444 (2026-07-31 16:01:14+00:00): It seems the material I mean is called "crusher fines". There is already some use of it in OSM, but very rare.
rskedgell (2021-04-06 17:51:38+00:00): Dragged node in St Joseph's Place, Glasgow repaired in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102424883
SekeRob (2021-04-06 18:20:56+00:00): @ rskedgell. That's the advantage of letting the whole of Europe. ME and northern Africa know about one's advertisement. People will see the errors in the ad too ;o).
ILikeTownsAndCities (2021-04-16 07:06:39+00:00): Please stop making such large changesets. This disrupts mappers in the area.
ILikeTownsAndCities (2021-04-16 07:06:53+00:00): Especially with 1 or 2 nodes.
trigpoint (2021-04-17 12:06:32+00:00): Please be careful when mapping speedlimits. 

You are still making serious errors, particularly with 20 mph zones, again you have mapped roads which are 20 mph as 30 mph.

I have fixed your errors.

Cheers Phil
praeteritum (2022-07-31 05:15:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124288379.
Bob (2021-04-14 18:02:28+00:00): Hi!
Die Straßen waren wegen geringer Verkehrsbedeutung, geringem Verkehrsaufkommen, Ausbauzustand, Höchstgeschwindigkeit und Straßeneinschränkungen nicht als secondary getaggt, da nicht die formelle Einstufung als Landesstraße, sondern insbesondere die Verkehrsbedeutung maßgeblich für das Tagging ist: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attributierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland#Einstufung 

Hat sich die verkehrliche Bedeutung nunmehr signifikant zu den Vorjahren geändert?
yukawa (2021-04-15 06:22:53+00:00): Hm, guter Punkt. So sehr oft komme ich dort auch nicht entlang, so dass ich bspw. Verkehrsaufkommen nur schlecht beurteilen kann. Ausbauzustand ist in der Tat nicht so gut. Hast recht, war vielleicht etwas voreilig. Ich ändere das mal besser erstmal wieder zurück und schau nochmal, wie es aktuell aussieht...
eggie (2021-04-06 18:11:49+00:00): Adresnode 36 kwam 2x voor Die heb ik weer verwijderd.
Alle adresnodes zijn import vanuit het Kadaster.
gr eggie
Supaplex (2021-04-17 09:37:07+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_5359 (2021-04-06 20:42:31+00:00): Hello! Please check the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8392102115/history. The given value of website isn't a web address (of your version).
eggie (2021-04-06 18:15:16+00:00): Roel.. kwaad kan het niet, maar foot=yes is default op een wandelpad.

MBG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 11:03:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103132090 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-09-02 17:16:32+00:00): Hallo godfredkah2,

warum hast du hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/17433563/ motor_vehicle=permit gesetzt? Ich hätte hgv=no gemappt. Ich war nicht vor Ort, hab aber diese openstreetcam Bild von Mitte 2020 angeschaut: 
https://storage13.openstreetcam.org/files/photo/2020/5/10/lth/2216702_83aed_5eb7daa437a26.jpg

Viele Grüße
Ze0zohk1
godfredkah2 (2021-09-04 11:10:37+00:00): Hallo Ze0zohk1,
vielen Dank für Deine Message. Offenbar ist die Durchfahrt inzwischen nur für Omnibusse erlaubt. Das kannst Du gerne dahingehend ändern!
Gruss
GodfredKah
Ze0zohk1 (2021-09-04 11:17:44+00:00): Hallo GodfredKah,

ich hab das in www.osm.org/changeset/110712037 korrigiert. Hab dazu das Verkehrszeichentool verwendet: https://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/ Ich habe also ergänzt:
bus=designated + vehicle=no + hgv=no + traffic_sign=DE:245;253

Viele Grüße und danke für deine Rückmeldung
Ze0zohk1
ash_win (2021-04-08 12:36:11+00:00): Hi anitaliao,
Connected Floating segment to main road and changed classification from trunk to foot way as it leading to farm land
kindly check with way 926831532,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102564762
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102424939
!bm (2021-04-07 21:12:19+00:00): Hallo Patrick1977Bln

die Fläche außerhalb ist doch sicher kein zweites Restaurant gleichen Namens, sondern das zugehörige outdoor_seating? 

Entsprechend korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102425219

--besteGrüße!bm
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 11:03:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103132090 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
FraukeLeo (2023-12-30 19:18:44+00:00): Hallo ldbs, kann es sein, dass dieser Mast https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8600064097 möglicherweise geplant, aber nicht gebaut wurde? Die Masten der Neubauleitung stehen hier nördlich der A 7 in gleichmäßigen Abständen. Wenn dieser Mast rausfällt, kommt das hin. Ich hab aber keine einzelnen Positionen überprüft heute im Vorbeifahren.
ldbs (2024-01-03 17:08:16+00:00): Stimmt. Mast C076 war schon in den zugrundeliegenden Planungsunterlagen gestrichen. Ist aber aus Versehen noch mit seinen urspruenglichen Koordinaten reingerutscht. Aenderung kommt...
syntex (2022-01-24 18:58:12+00:00): Dlaczego? przecież to most
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 11:03:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103132090 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
eggie (2021-04-06 19:33:47+00:00): feedback.. Lijkt me oke..  tracktype=grade4 heb ik  verwijderd van een highway=path   Die specificatie hoort bij een track. 
Gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 11:03:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103132090 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-18 11:03:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103132090 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
trial (2021-04-07 18:54:04+00:00): Une maison qui va de Calan à Lorient ? Pratique pour le confinement ;-).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-04-20 09:11:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 103254989 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from HOT, reverting some poor quality edits. In this case the user has been contacted about this but problems still occurred afterwards.
PolyDunami (2021-04-06 18:41:02+00:00): There's enough information to add in the missing bus route. The first step is to make sure all the stops are added, and this edit include the stops for the 388 westbound trip.
gabro00 (2021-04-06 21:43:28+00:00): 999,71m lett
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102426590
gabro00 (2021-04-06 21:52:15+00:00): A nevét átírtam egy kicsit barátságosabb "Vértó futókör"-re, ha gondolod írd vissza vagy írd be az alt_name címkébe.