piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-04-23 15:11:20+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Because you are a new mapper, validators review your work and give comment and advise.
on this work you did not square much buildings. 
Use always the Q key in RapiD to square the buildings. Please be more accurate in mapping the buildings.  You mapped also a residential area. It went through 2 buildings. These are errors and should be avoided / repaired.  You overlooked the issue triangle on the righthand menu which warned about that issu. Always solve the issues when possible before uploading your work
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84006622
Minh Nguyen (2020-09-12 00:16:06+00:00): Hi, thanks for your attention to this part of the map. This is related to https://www.wdam.com/2020/06/08/lamar-county-intersection-be-rerouted-driver-safety/ , correct? It sounds like the changes haven’t been completed yet, so changeset 90780773 temporarily undid the changes. But please feel free to redo the changes once they’re complete. When you do, please consider using Sentence Case rather than ALL CAPS and choosing the Residential Road preset instead of Primary Road. Your edits are less likely to be mistaken for vandalism that way.
tastrax (2020-05-04 03:52:23+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
chachafish (2020-04-24 03:27:06+00:00): Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. In this changeset you created a large body of water that crosses many roads. Can you return and fix this, adding bridges where necessary and perhaps making this body of water follow the contours of the satellite imagery better? Thank you
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 17:07:12+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?
user_5359 (2020-04-23 15:16:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description as standard keys, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
Vinber (2020-04-24 07:15:41+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue Mairie d'Anglet 2 :D
JIDB (2020-05-16 20:35:26+00:00): Hallo,
diese 3 Autobahn-Stücke waren verschwunden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4084452, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30108762 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30108763
Ich habe jetzt wieder motorway_link eingetragen, damit die Autobahn wieder da ist (motorway_junction ist nur für nodes, siehe Wiki)
JIDB (2020-05-16 20:36:26+00:00): PS: anscheinend waren weitere Stücke der Autobahnkreuz verschwunden. Da hatte es jemand anders vor mir entdeckt und schon korrigiert.
maro21 (2020-04-23 20:08:03+00:00): Nazwa z cudzysłowami jest błędna, nie nazywamy tak przystanków, ani restauracji ani innych obiektów chyba że przed nazwą w cudzysłowie pojawia się rodzaj, np. poprawnie byłoby Przystanek "Siedzikówny", Przedszkole "ABC". Mapowanie nie polega na bezmyślnym przepisywaniu rzeczy z tablic.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-04-24 09:08:45+00:00): Hallo zumd,

das shop=mall tag war bereits als eigenständiger Knoten vorhanden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1580193944/history

Leider waren die POI-Daten über zwei Nodes und dem Gebäude-way verteilt. Ich habe die Daten am Gebäude ergänzt/korrigiert und die beiden redundanten Nodes gelöscht.

Außerdem hast Du einen kleinen Schreibfehler beim Namen gemacht. ;-)

Gruß Roger Wilco
skarabejj (2020-04-28 06:53:02+00:00): Improper use of higway_junction tag in highway interchange surrounding Allianz Arena - motorway_link replaced with highway_junction which destroyed the junction structure (notice the color of the road, it's not red anymore)
e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91275335
Djminisite (2020-05-11 20:04:34+00:00): Hi Alex, welcome to OSM!

Just wondering if there was a reason for adding new restraunts in Cullercoats which are already on the map?

If it was a mistake I can help you tidy these up if you'd like? It is possible in ID to merge them together (although in this case because the details already exist in the buildings themselves I'd suggest just removing the excess nodes?)

If you need any help, or have any questions, feel free to get in touch!

Thanks
AlexF1989 (2020-05-12 07:38:28+00:00): Hello sorry I just thought i was adding pointers just misunderstood, I have since deleted them as to fix up the mess. 

Thank you, 
All the best, 
Alex
Djminisite (2020-05-12 11:45:45+00:00): Ah fab! Thank you :)

All the best!
mapman44 (2020-04-23 15:57:07+00:00): Thanks for your contributions in OSM. Just a tip...before editing make sure you have aligned the satellite imagery you are using to the existing roads in the area. Here's the Wiki page that explains why, and how to do it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
Russ McD (2020-07-08 15:16:55+00:00): Maraianapepsico - Please be careful with your edits; you have just changed a jungle track in Thailand, into a 70kmph secondary road, 70 mtrs wide!  
I have corrected it.
dvyasha (2020-04-23 14:46:55+00:00): Created residential roads
mapman44 (2020-04-23 15:53:50+00:00): Thanks for your contributions in OSM. Just a tip...before editing make sure you have aligned the satellite imagery you are using to the existing roads in the area. Here's the Wiki page that explains why, and how to do it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
Quiggifur (2020-04-25 23:31:20+00:00): Noted. I've downloaded a suggested tracking app on my phone, and as soon as possible I'll record some tracks to make sure the edits are correct.
Quiggifur (2020-04-26 00:53:18+00:00): I just verified all my previous changes via GPS tracks. The aerial imagery was very close; I did make a slight edit to Genson by 240 though. Thanks for the advice.
mapman44 (2020-04-23 15:48:50+00:00): Please explain why you deleted the driveways. They can be an important part of navigating to an address. Please read the Wiki page on driveways: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway
Quiggifur (2020-04-25 23:26:59+00:00): My thought process: people are always getting lost up here, thinking they see roads on the map which aren't actually roads. I didn't see the value in having driveways on the map.. But I understand what you're saying now, after reading the wiki page on driveways.
user_5359 (2020-04-23 15:28:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!
oba510 (2020-04-24 03:29:15+00:00): Hi, see the comments at:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82892963#map=18/37.87076/-122.26812
sleepy1771 (2020-06-23 21:43:23+00:00): Der Hofladen Volleth scheint schon zu existieren. Ggf. kann der "alte" Laden mit den neuen Daten ergänzt werden (und ggf. auch der Standort entsprechend angepasst werden). Aber so existiert der Hofladen zweimal.
oba510 (2020-04-24 03:29:38+00:00): Hi, see the comments at:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82892963
claytonvo (2020-04-24 19:31:00+00:00): Hello Oba510, 

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I mistakenly made the edit without checking the way history first. I will make sure to do so in the future. Thank you for correcting my previous changeset. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused on your part. 

Thank You,
Clayton
highflyer74 (2020-05-08 16:59:59+00:00): Moin!

Ein kleiner Hinweis: der Kindergarten, den Du hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/795302709 angelegt hast, ist bereits seit 2008 dort gemappt. Und zwar durch Dich. Sei doch nett, Dich genau umzusehen, ob Dinge bereits auf irgendwelchen Nodes, Ways oder Relationen sitzen.

Dann macht mich noch etwas stutzig: umfasst der Kindergarten wirklich den gesamten Häuserblock mit mehreren Adressen?

Sei so nett, Dich hier kurz zu melden, damit wir die Lage klären können.

Danke!
Romwriter (2020-05-08 18:40:30+00:00): Dass das den ganzen Häuserblock umfasst, war ein Versehen. Eigentlich wollte ich bloß die Spielfläche hinter dem Haus einbeziehen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84911084 -- Jetzt besser?
eggie (2020-04-23 15:57:39+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Linkid (2021-01-11 08:42:46+00:00): Bonjour,
La station existait déjà plus haut dans la rue et a été déplacé par TAO. Le plus simple était de déplacer le point existant plutôt que d'en rajouter un ;).
J'ai fusionné les peux points, il n'y a maintenant plus de doublon :).
Bonne journée, et merci pour les photos fortes utiles !
CurlingMan13 (2023-02-23 03:39:34+00:00): Please do not add driveways as cartpaths.  Portions of this changeset has been reverted to correct vandalism.
NetWormKido (2020-06-03 11:34:58+00:00): Не нужно изменять классы дорог, если  недостаточно хорошо понимаете как/зачем/почему.
MCDA (2020-10-07 23:43:35+00:00): The A1/A3/A4/A5 Belfast-Lisburn-Portadown-Ballygawley-Omagh-Derry are trunk roads, known as the T3 or the Western Transport corridor - https://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2017/226/made
I am requesting these change-sets be reverted.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-10-17 21:24:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 92642411 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some trunk to primary changes in NI following a complaint to the DWG.  See https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&amp;pKey=aX4dUN8V-7Sux3mU4_DM0g&amp;lat=54.83099226210294&amp;lng=-7.470199667141287&amp;z=17 et al.
5m4u9 (2020-04-24 08:16:42+00:00): sugerencia, las imagenes MAXAR en La Paz y Potosí (en casi todo lugar de bolivia) están mal corregidas, no ajustaron las laderas las toman en cuenta como plano...mejor mapear con bing y luego cambiar y ajustar lo que cambio recorriendo poquito a poquito cada vez que subes hacia la montaña... esero que se entienda :)

a veces las fronteras administrativas estorban, hay opción en iD editor de ocultar con la tecla F -> map features -> boundaries
Caleidoscopic (2020-04-24 20:21:09+00:00): sí, las vi un poco deformes en algún lugar pero me pareció que las ajusté con Bing, de todas maneras daré una mirada, muchas gracias!
Tampoco conocía el truco de apagar fronteras (fantasías) gracias!
mapman44 (2020-04-23 16:08:50+00:00): Thanks for adding the roundabout. You may want to take a look at the Wiki page about how it should be tagged: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
Glassman (2020-04-23 16:22:13+00:00): TIP: Instead of deleting then adding it back in, just change the geometry and as needed the tags. Doing so will preserve the history of the feature.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84011152
Hjart (2020-04-23 17:25:16+00:00): Bemærk at denne type forretning bedst tagges  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcharity
Hjart (2020-04-23 17:26:16+00:00): amenity=recycling bruges ved genbrugspladser + genbrugscontainere og lignende
Vinber (2020-04-24 07:05:53+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier 1 / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).

Cas particulier 2 / Si vous êtes un commerçant et que vous souhaitez voir apparaître votre commerce dans OpenStreetMap et donc également sur Ça reste ouvert, Qwant Maps, ... 1 lien ressource : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:shop 

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber (2020-04-24 07:08:51+00:00): Vous avez la possibilité d'ajouter votre page dans les données OpenStreetMap :
contact:facebook="url-de-votre-page"
Hightide10 (2020-05-11 20:08:31+00:00): Open Street Cam
trial (2020-04-26 12:27:45+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap. A few things here:
- you changed things in two very different parts of the world 5chile and UK), you should do that in two separated sets.
- buildings are mostly rectangles, after drawing, press Q (quadrat).
henry44 (2020-06-13 12:04:07+00:00): Hi leichef,
detour depends on from where to where people are going. Now it's a big detour for people coming from south (Isar) and going east.
---
The name is an approximately description. And it needs to be since the start and endpoints are often at intersections with other routes.
---
If a road is allowed only in one direction, there are specific tags in osm to specify that, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dbicycle#Members_of_the_Relation
---
I restored the route and added the direction.
Adding new Information, including routes is great, but when deleting information, there need to be really good reasons for that.
henry
eggie (2020-04-23 16:27:03+00:00): Dag Marco... De tagging voor fietspaden is "nu" naar voortschrijdend inzicht als volgt.
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
Dit zou dan een G13 fietspad zijn. 
Op fietskaarten renderen die dan minder prominent dan een brom/fietspad. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-04-23 16:28:10+00:00): Het veranderen is wel van de "lange adem" Ik doe zelf ook pas iets als ik het toevallig tegenkom. (en zeker weet)
Marco Nell (2020-04-23 18:33:45+00:00): Ik heb het veranderd in de officiele tagging.
trigpoint (2020-04-28 16:29:52+00:00): Please do not remove correct data, I have restored the names.
ACarlotti (2020-05-08 14:36:33+00:00): This changeset edits a way around the tennis court so that court is now duplicated and the boundary fence is unmapped. I've reverted this (and added your capacity tag to the other way instead).
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-04-24 11:59:30+00:00): Moin didimosi,

danke für Deine schnelle Reaktion/ Korrektur, aber bei der Gärtnerei darf das Tag ruhig stehen bleiben. ;-)

(Ob es die da aktuell noch gibt, weiß ich zwar nicht, aber da war zumindest eine.)

Gruß Roger Wilco
didimosi (2020-04-24 12:50:24+00:00): ... gibt's noch, ist die Gärtnerei Mull.
Gruß didimosi
mueschel (2020-04-25 09:47:42+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the source of these scrub areas? I don't see any kind of bushes or similar vegetation in any of the available aerial images.

Jan
mapman44 (2020-04-23 17:19:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to OSM maps. Please note that anything related to Google or Google Maps is copyrighted information and should not be used on OpenStreetMaps in any way. This reference will be removed. Thanks.
Frans S (2020-04-24 10:39:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Very precise mapped. 
You found even very remote buildings .!
trigpoint (2020-04-28 16:28:26+00:00): What is the source of these names?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-06-21 10:42:30+00:00): This edit was reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106709139 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106301007
mapman44 (2020-04-23 17:14:43+00:00): Thanks for adding the buildings. Just a tip...you can square up the corners by selecting and pressing the Q key. They'll look a lot neater! Thanks.
eggie (2020-04-23 17:19:24+00:00): Oke... access=no is ongebruikelijk. 
Beter weghalen denk ik. 
foot=yes kan er dan ook af. 
Eigenlijk nooit mee beginnen. 
Water op andere vlakken moet eigenlijk anders. Ik zal dat aanpassen met een multipolygoon. Anders zie je alles dor elkaar.
Gr Eggie
xronos (2020-04-29 08:45:20+00:00): почему опять было удалено так много тегов? Вижу, разговоры, уговоры ни к чему не приводят?
Теги access c gate то чем мешают?
eggie (2020-04-23 18:45:23+00:00): Oke...Even ter leering ende vermaeck 

Een highway=track (bedoeld voor voertuigen met vier wielen) heeft altijd een tracktype.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Key:tracktype
tracktype=grade1  is verhard  grade2 is halfverhard. 
gravel is dus grade2  Op fietskaarten wordt compacted (aangestampte kleigrond)  ook gezien als half verhard. 
gravel is vrij grof.. Voor fietsers bedoelde paden is vaak fine_gravel
eggie (2020-04-23 18:46:25+00:00): Is het Waterlandse pad gewoon opengesteld voor auto's? Op OSM nu dus wel.
Marco Nell (2020-04-25 09:25:40+00:00): Ik heb er fine_gravel / grade 2 van gemaakt.
Niet opengesteld voor auto's. (Oranje bordje SBB en slagboom aan het begin bij de Meentplaats. Hoop dat ik dit goed getagd heb met motor_vehicle = forestry; de boswachter rijdt er wel eens overheen.
eggie (2020-04-25 09:52:33+00:00): Blijft lastig al die accesstags. 
Je kunt de slagboom gewoon mappen op een node en daar ook de accesstags op zetten.
barrier= swing_gate  lift_gate ??
Denk dat je gewoon motor_vehicle=no 
(dat is incl moped en mofa) kunt taggen.. het zou hier  anders gewoon routeren voor autoverkeer.
evt access=forestry of forestry=yes (even in de wiki kijken) erbij, maar dat geldt voor alle natuurgebieden van sbb.
Als daar niets over op de borden staat gewoon die forestry weglaten. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Gr eggie
Marco Nell (2020-04-25 15:42:46+00:00): Dank Eggie, weer wat geleerd. Ik heb de access tags gewijzigd. Groeten, Marco.
mapman44 (2020-04-23 17:30:26+00:00): Thanks for adding the roundabout. You may want to review this Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout
TooLazyDidntName (2020-04-23 17:34:13+00:00): Thank you. Is there something I am doing wrong here?
mapman44 (2020-04-23 17:38:56+00:00): It looks ok in general but the Wiki page will explain how to create and tag the roundabout properly.
Łukasz Świtaj (2020-10-30 12:36:01+00:00): Dlaczego usunąłeś building=retail?
eggie (2020-04-23 17:43:23+00:00): Lijkt mij oke... Het wordt nog wat daar!
Gr eggie
BCNorwich (2020-04-23 18:32:14+00:00): Hi Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I changed the tag from landuse=farmyard to landuse=farmland. Moved to farm POI to the buildings.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-04-23 18:39:49+00:00): Remove one building that's not there, square up building and add tags from nearby POI
BCNorwich (2020-04-23 18:43:33+00:00): Esri imagery shows this as a pair of houses, thus I've removed the number and tagged as building=residential.
Regards Bernard.
eggie (2020-04-23 18:37:45+00:00): Kijk eens hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:wetland=reedbed
 wetland = reedbed
Er is geen getijdengebied hier.
Pas eerst nu zaken aan voordat je weer aan je volgende project begint.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-04-23 18:39:31+00:00): dus  natural=wetland met wetland=reedbed.
CharliePlett (2020-05-05 20:12:05+00:00): Hey man, this is awesome. Thank you for adding the street names. Where or how in the world did you get this information?
BigKev97 (2021-02-12 16:25:04+00:00): From Here Maps.
mariotomo (2022-10-10 14:38:48+00:00): Subject to your full and continued compliance with the Terms and the applicable laws, HERE grants you a non-exclusive, non-transferable, non-sublicensable, revocable, and limited personal license to access HERE Products for your own use or use within your company.
BCNorwich (2020-04-23 18:50:53+00:00): Placed tags from POI onto building.
Frans S (2020-05-07 07:31:09+00:00): Hello. Thanks  for mapping here.
A request
Please do not collect several buildings in 1 mapping and be sure not to map including the yard. A building can be recognized by its shadow. Most buildings have a walled yard. The shadow of those walls are lower.
Just map buildings
Best regards
nevw (2020-04-24 06:18:30+00:00): Hi
I noticed that the OSM Inspector site finds duplicated segments in your relations
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.27881&lat=-26.95733&zoom=8
I suggest using Esri imagery for better clarity (and possibly more recent too) and you will find there is a gap between two kindergarten polygons. 
Polygons cannot share outer ways, so for the two kindergarten areas, it may be best to just make a single polygon surrounding all the kindergarten boundary as amenity=kindergarten 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=kindergarten
Then make the buildings in the kindergarten part separate and tagged as building=kindergarten or building=yes and the grassed play area as landuse=grass or maybe leisure=playground and access=private.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dkindergarten

Regarding Mazenod, you will find the Esri imagery better. Again two outer ways in multipolygons cannot share borders.
So you may find it easiest just to have one polygon around the whole building or you could also still mark different parts of a building using 'building parts'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part

Rodrigo Hall is similar problem

A bit of general info on relations
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

If two separately grouped multipolygons share a segment along part of their boundaries, you need to split the ways at each end of the shared bit, delete one of the segments and then share the remaining one in each multipolygon otherwise you will see OSMI Inpector show a 'duplicate segment' problem. 
The ones you mapped are not like this.
These commonly crop up where for example, a National Park multipolygon shares part of a boundary with a State Forest.

Cheers, Nev
nevw (2020-04-24 06:19:49+00:00): Also iD editor is rather limited in making relations, use the JOSM editor instead.
nevw (2020-04-24 06:31:10+00:00): A better view of the OSM Inspector area of concern
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.96835&lat=-27.15172&zoom=18
Warin61 (2020-05-03 09:45:12+00:00): You should correct this error.
Coppertine (2020-05-03 09:46:48+00:00): I already fixed that issue iirc..
Warin61 (2020-05-03 10:46:29+00:00): Err No. 
As of right now (checked with JOSM);

Relation 11029434 has shared outer segments

Relation 11029429 has shared outer segments. Additionally a way is duplicated within the relation i.e. it appears twice. 

See http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=152.96835&lat=-27.15172&zoom=18

Both these relations need to be fixed.
Coppertine (2020-05-05 04:00:21+00:00): Resolved in #84658476
Warin61 (2020-05-05 06:50:41+00:00): Ok. The relationship 11029434 is now a one member relation, it would be simpler without the relation - a simple way.
Coppertine (2020-05-05 07:12:01+00:00): If that's mazenod, those are technically two buildings but separated to three in this instance, I think it's better that way to show they are separate buildings. and yes, they are classified as one single building/location
Warin61 (2020-05-05 10:46:43+00:00): Note .. this is nit picking .. don't be too worried by it. 

Looking closer... 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11029434  
tags:
building 	school
type 	multipolygon
member
Way 264931804 as outer 

Relation: Rodrigo Hall (11029433)
tags
building 	school
description 	Indoor basketball court used for assemblies and musicals. 
name 	Rodrigo Hall
type 	multipolygon

member
Way 264931804 as outer 

----------------------------------
Both these relation use the same way - they are duplicates. 

Relation 11029434 should be deleted as the information is already duplicated in Relation: Rodrigo Hall (11029433).

Relation: Rodrigo Hall (11029433) can also be deleted if its tags are placed on to way 264931804.
BCNorwich (2020-04-23 18:55:27+00:00): Hi, the school name is on the overall premises outline, I've tagged the three buildings as building=school.
Regards Bernard.