piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk (2021-09-10 13:48:05+00:00): Привет, старый волк,

Что именно означает "acë"?
Хорошие комментарии к changeset полезны для других картографов, как вы можете прочитать здесь:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Warin61 (2021-09-10 07:28:13+00:00): Herre you again have removed the outer way in a tree relation 8217637.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.18256&lat=-37.72074&zoom=16
MapAbility (2021-09-10 08:06:37+00:00): Sorry, I've been pulling in data from the VIC governmant site and it's taking me longer than I expected so the map is missing trees around here at the moment, hope to have it populated soon.
Henosb (2021-09-13 22:42:25+00:00): Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2021-06-16
ovruni (2021-09-10 04:43:00+00:00): Hola, algunos de sus conjuntos de cambios contienen el texto "correcciones", sin embargo esto no suficiente información sobre los cambios realizados, por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en los conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
JeroenvanderGun (2021-09-21 18:59:59+00:00): NWB indicates both are Schipholweg, but the service roads for the Esso stations are Provincialeweg N205.
GinaroZ (2021-09-23 13:23:00+00:00): Hi, are you able to link me to the planning document that you used for mapwarper?
bradwiggo (2021-09-24 16:31:46+00:00): This is the one I used: https://www.thecourier.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/12/2017/08/Madras-design-2.jpg
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:55:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-09-15 23:54:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 111264809 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a number of changes (at the request of the mapper) following PM reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111068364 , https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/111046069 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5333 .
pza (2021-09-10 00:52:21+00:00): Some details are here, however my changes were based on a site survey. https://caportal.com.au/tfnsw/wcxri/news-archive?hview=post-83d892-weekly-update-rozelle-lilyfield-and-annandale-w-c-13-september
felipeeugenio (2021-09-10 11:07:47+00:00): Hola Karina. BIenvenida a la comunidad OSM Chile.Una duda; están reciviendo alguna instrucción de cómo mapear los elementos que están mapeando? hay otros usuarios que están dibujando mas o menos lo mismo que tú.
El tema es que hay varios conceptos equivocados. Solo para saber y cntactarnos con quien los está instruyendo.
saludos
Kristine France (2021-09-10 17:15:16+00:00): Hola! Soy Kristine y estoy a cargo del mapeo de Karina. 
Por favor, dinos qué es lo que no corresponde. Qué estamos haciendo mal?
felipeeugenio (2021-09-10 17:27:06+00:00): Hola Kristine
Primero que nada me disculpo por las faltas de ortografía en el mensaje anterior, escribí muy a la raída y en la oscuridad.

Para un cruce lo que hay que hacer es seguir las instrucciones de la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcrossing)
por lo general no necesitas mas que highway=crossing;crossin_ref=zebra (si acaso es un paso zebra) y crossing=uncontrolled, si acaso no depende de señales del tránsito.

Ustedes dibujan líneas sin tags y en los extremos ponen un nodo con surface=paved, lo que no tiene ningún sentido.
Si desean dibujar la acera, enconcer un highway=footway es lo ideal, pero solo si la acera está considerablemebte separada de la calle. Si está junta: con sidewalk=right/left/both basta.

Por favor siempre consultar la wiki o ingresar al chat de la comunidad chilena (https://t.me/OSMcl) y preguntar con toda confianza. Muchos maperos podrán responder con mucho gusto.
Warin61 (2021-09-10 07:25:53+00:00): Hi,
Why have you made relation 8217634 (trees) have only one member - and that member has the role 'inner'.. This make no sense. The relation should have an outer to define the outside of it .. and then the role 'inner would define an area without trees. 
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.20309&lat=-37.71746&zoom=16
Observe the lack of trees now showing on the map.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-09-11 18:16:59+00:00): Hello cire722,

you change is spanning half of the world. Did you really visit both parking places?

Regards
Ze0zohk1
The Mapping Penguin (2021-09-12 01:28:51+00:00): I lived in Sweden for a while and then moved to the us, so yes.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-09-12 11:16:19+00:00): Hello cire722,

I think you are new to OSM, right? Thanks for contributing to OSM!

If you are sure that your memory and the reality still match, fine. But could you next time choose a smaller changeset? You where using StreetComplete. StreetComplete does not close changesets immediately. It would have been better to edit the parking place with the online editor (then you could have stated that your source is not "survey" but "local knowledge").

If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me (or somebody else) ;-)

Regards
Ze0zohk1
The Mapping Penguin (2021-09-12 13:51:03+00:00): Ok thank you, will do that next time.
Ze0zohk1 (2021-09-12 15:17:19+00:00): 👍
Mashin (2021-09-18 22:52:26+00:00): Hi Stefault,
just out of curiosity, what is the purpose of adding type=multipolygon to water areas? e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/974767195

This is normally used on relation to denote that it is a multipolygon.
nevw (2021-12-28 04:13:45+00:00): Hi BushTel
I have added the Dhimurru Indigenous Protected Area sea country.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Australian_Dedicated_Indigenous_Protected_Areas_2020 
Do you wish to amend the fixme tags regards this or should I delete them?
nevw (2021-12-28 04:16:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13603738
nevw (2022-01-17 06:07:10+00:00): I have re-mapped many of the islands to Esri imagery and used that for the IPA boundaries. A few were left alone as differences were not so bad.
I have deleted the fixme from the Dhimurru Indigenous Protected Area relation.
Giuseppe Salvador (2021-09-15 03:09:58+00:00): Señor, ¿por qué le encanta revertir mis ediciones? Le cuento que yo soy de Cajamarca y participé en Google MapMaker por muchos años, todas las ediciones que hice son corroborables en planos catastrales, Google StreetView, etc. Qué mal, pero desde ya le digo que yo seguiré editando, saludos.
ovruni (2021-09-15 04:23:00+00:00): Hola, ya anteriormente le había escrito sobre que no se puede utilizar google para agregar datos de OSM. Ahora nuevamente ha mencionado que continua utilizando Google y otras fuentes de origen desconocido, por este motivo voy a revertir sus conjuntos de cambios comunicar sobre esto en el grupo de telegram de la comunidad https://t.me/osmpe  (a la cual ya había invitado previamente).
Saludos
Giuseppe Salvador (2021-09-15 17:23:40+00:00): ¿En qué momento he mencionado que utilizo Google como fuente? Lo que he dicho es que mis ediciones se pueden CORROBORAR en sitios como Google STREET VIEW que es diferente. Yo no necesito usar a Google como fuente porque yo conozco Cajamarca, es mi ciudad de nacimiento y durante muchos años me basé en lo que conozco y en los planos catastrales de la municipalidad para editar Google Maps. Por cierto la única guerra de ediciones la genera usted con sus reversiones, yo solo restituyo lo que existe y está bien. Y por último, yo hasta el momento no he hecho grandes ediciones que "pongan en riesgo la integridad del mapa" o cosas así, son simples correcciones de nombre, prefijos, ríos, semáforos, geometría, etc, que le hacen falta al mapa, pero es una lástima que exista gente que solo atine a revertir y revertir, quizás esa sea una razón por la que este mapa nunca está del todo actualizado, en fin.
user_14250389 (2021-10-16 15:12:45+00:00): 您好，為何將學堂路，清華路等一些允許車輛行進的主幹道也降級為輔助道路？這並不利於分層次表示道路關係，我將嘗試對部分問題進行修正。
user_5359 (2022-05-02 19:39:29+00:00): Welchem to OSM! Please have a look on  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663903631/history. What is the meaning of the the tag highway = private?
Glassman (2021-09-11 16:00:54+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111002629
wielandb (2021-09-12 17:59:22+00:00): Hey :)
Ich war vorhin vor Ort, und für
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170092671
wäre die richtige Antwort in StreetComplete "Mehrfach/Blockgaragen" statt "Einzelgarage" gewesen. Habe das mal entsprechend korrigiert.
rhab (2021-09-12 18:21:01+00:00): Hi, ja, sry da habe ich wohl den falschen Typ erwischt. Danke fürs Fixen. Das mit der Firma war mir auch aufgefallen, konnte es aber im Vorbeifahren nicht anpassen.
skyper (2021-09-11 13:11:51+00:00): Hallo krja
Gibt es wirklich neben dem Cafe "Erste Liebe" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5437073222) noch ein Restaurant (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/248594170)?
Wenn ich mir die Geschichte der beiden Objekte anschaue, vermute ich stark, dass aus dem Restaurant das Cafe entstand.

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
Dodko (2023-07-15 19:18:47+00:00): Netreba meniť web pošty https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8911971540/history
hackthemap (2021-09-12 13:54:47+00:00): Hallo Carsten_FfM,

ich bin mir nicht sicher ob track hier wirklich besser passt. Hast du die Beschreibung des Tags im Wiki gesehen? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Dort wird hauptsächlich von einer landwirtschaftlichen Nutzung geredet und dem Zugang zu anliegenden Feldern. Außerdam steht z.B. "das Betretungsrecht ergibt sich aus anderen Gesetzen wie den Landeswald- und -naturschutzgesetzen".
Da der Weg hier in einem Park in einer Stadt liegt und wahrscheinlich nur für die Baumaßnahmen des Cafés mehr von vierspurigen Fahrzeugen befahren wird denke ich dass highway=path wesentlich besser die hauptsächliche Nutzung und Art (sehr gut befestigt) des Weges wiederspiegelt.

Wie interpretierst du den Wiki Artikel?

VG
hackthemap
Carsten_FfM (2021-09-14 16:11:41+00:00): Hallo Hackthemap,

das möchte ich mir nach Deinem Hinweis nochmal genauer vor Ort anschauen. Kann jedoch ein paar Woche dauern. Ich gehe davon aus, dass Übernachtungsstätte und Cafe regelmäßig mit Autos angefahren wird. Ein Möglichkeit wäre noch highway=service?

Gruß

Carsten
hackthemap (2021-09-14 20:28:39+00:00): Hi Carsten :)

Also die Übernachtungsstätte existiert bereits länger und es gibt zwar eine Schranke am Eingang des Ostparks, aber Autos hat man im Park sehr sehr selten gesehen. Auch die Platten die derzeit auf dem Weg liegen (vermutlich für schwere Baustellenfahrzeuge?) sind kein normaler Teil des Weges.
highway=service mit entsprechendem access tag für motor_vehicle wäre eine Möglichkeit, ich weiß aber nicht, ob das nicht für einen Weg in einem Park eher irreführend ist, da man normalerweise ja nicht auf einem highway=service in einem Park hauptsächlich Fußgänger und Fahrradfahrer, die den Park benutzen, erwarten würde.

Auch wenn gerade mehr Autos unterwegs sind würde ich das, vor allem östlichen Teil des Weges (ab der Kreuzung mit dem anderen Weg) eher als Zweckentfremdung des Weges sehen. Im vorderen/westlichen Teil könnte ich mir ein highway=service passender vorstellen.

Oder darf man auch mit etwas anderem als einer Sondererlaubnis hier einfahren?

VG
hackthemap
user_14250389 (2021-10-17 09:55:16+00:00): 您好，StarTrailer

注意到您於此變更集中將大量的道路合併

要注意我們有時會把一個道路拆分成兩半，是因為只有其中的一半位於關係內作為公車線路，而另一半則不是
您為它們命名是很好的，但是您大量的合併同一條路的路線，造成校內校車關係的錯亂，如下

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1253305/history#map=16/40.0025/116.3257

望您能及時根據校內校車情況對這一問題進行修正。若校車已停止運營，就直接刪掉這個關係。（但據我瞭解目前仍有運營）

您在之後使用JOSM或iD的視窗編輯器時，請務必注意一條路徑是否為關係的一部分

祝編安
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
syntex (2021-09-11 13:13:56+00:00): Nie ładnie, kasować bez zgłoszenia? I przez to znowu pojawiają się w importach. Nei fajen
maraf24 (2021-09-11 16:39:21+00:00): Strona z importami to narzędzie zewnętrzne, zgłaszać tam powinni ci, którzy regularnie z tego narzędzia korzystają.
NieWnen (2021-09-11 17:00:26+00:00): Jakby coś, to już zgłoszone na budynkach i e-mapie.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
user_5359 (2022-03-20 05:46:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
IlBano (2022-12-09 10:40:36+00:00): Ciao Francesco V.
Hai inserito un access=discouraged su questo tratto di SP92, ma da immagini Mapillary di 1 mese prima rispetto alla tua modifica risulta solo un divieto per autobus e mezzi pesanti.
C'è un cartello specifico ?

Grazie

IlBano
Francesco V (2022-12-11 08:39:10+00:00): Ciao,
facevo riferimento a questo cartello:
https://www.google.it/maps/@43.841643,7.5908884,3a,49y,55.95h,84.14t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sQtVoAWxh69UcNStOtlPPwQ!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
user_5359 (2022-03-20 05:46:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
pitscheplatsch (2021-09-10 14:48:11+00:00): Hi MapAbility, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your mapping activity? Your added way contains many uncommon tags, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/981497503

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
radiotrefoil (2022-01-07 09:31:03+00:00): Hi John, just wondering about way 667821395, if you meant to change the name from "Govetts Creek" to "Govetts Leap Creek" - all sources I can find suggest it's the former.
Cheers
2hu4u
John Bek (2022-01-07 09:49:22+00:00): I saw it named as such on this historic map where it says "Section E" in red. 
https://www.askroz.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/nla.obj-499787680-3-1.jpg
Cheers, John
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
osmviborg (2021-09-10 09:17:32+00:00): Hej. Jeg har tilpasset tagging på området. Du havde foretaget nogle uheldige ændringer. 'wikidata' kan man ikke bare slette, og 'wikipedia' navnet kan man ikke bare ændre, det kræver at ændringen også foretages på selve wikipedia. Området skal ikke tagges som 'area'. 'tourism=attraction' tilføjet.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
user_5359 (2022-03-20 05:15:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
user_5359 (2022-03-20 05:46:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:55:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:57:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
osmviborg (2021-09-10 07:44:28+00:00): Hej. Jeg har tilpasset tagging på området. Du havde foretaget nogle uheldige ændringer. 'wikidata' kan man ikke bare slette, og 'wikipedia' navnet kan man ikke bare ændre, det kræver at ændringen også foretages på selve wikipedia. Området skal ikke tagges som 'area'. 'tourism=attraction' tilføjet.
b-holdet (2021-09-10 08:23:17+00:00): Muligvis skulle din kommentar have været på dette sæt: 😉
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111007860
osmviborg (2021-09-10 09:14:22+00:00): Shit happens. Mon ikke beskeden når frem. :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
*abq* (2021-09-26 07:34:53+00:00): Hallo Herr Dr 
Weg bitte ans Wegenetz anschließen, nicht an die kommunalen Grenzen.
VG
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
JLZIMMERMANN (2021-10-08 09:12:13+00:00): Bonjour Joseph,
Pourquoi 
cette aire de manœuvre au sien de la gendarmerie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/196281731
devient une friche industrielle ?
joseph83 (2021-10-08 11:36:44+00:00): Bonjour,
Effectivement, c'était aussi le message d'erreur sur l'id "highway must be line not area" qui a été changé depuis. Je remets ça en road area. L'orthophoto express du vaucluse vient de sortir sur géoportail !
JLZIMMERMANN (2021-10-08 12:07:49+00:00): Je l'ai complété avec highway=service et en rajoutant 'service' au lieu du simple 'yes'
Car le rendu osm.org et tile.openstreetmap.fr ne réagissent pas pareil.
eggie (2021-09-10 09:32:48+00:00): Dag Rob...

Welk bord staat er vooraan?
bicycle=yes hoort niet op een fietspad. Dat is default. Dat geldt ook voor foot=yes al zie je dat wel meer.

Juiste tagging voor fietspaden
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11 
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a 
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13 

 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-09-10 09:58:00+00:00): Gaat goed met dat fietspad daar...
https://lc.nl/friesland/waadhoeke/Fietspad-bij-Wijnaldum-leidt-toeristen-naar-modderbad-Ik-zakte-tot-mijn-enkels-in-de-viezigheid-26894848.html
JeroenHoek (2021-09-10 10:26:05+00:00): Compleet ander fietspad dat, ten noorden van Wijnaldum.
eggie (2021-09-10 10:35:55+00:00): Oke.... 
Jeroen..Weet jij de status al van de nieuwe fietsverbinding?
Kan het even niet vinden in de Staatscourant..
Gr eggie
JeroenHoek (2021-09-10 11:18:07+00:00): Jahoor, deze is nieuw aangelegd en recent geopend. Mijn ouders zijn er toevallig al langsgefietst. Welk bord weet ik zo niet, maar dat komt wel. Het is in ieder geval een highway=cycleway.

https://www.oosterhof-holman.nl/nieuws/opening-fietspad-en-fietstunnel-midlum/
Erick tamba (2021-11-04 18:21:07+00:00): Added building