piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Verdy_p (2018-10-11 09:49:05+00:00): L'erreur initiale ne vient pas de moi, j'ai fait à tord confiance à Wikipédia ou à un autre texte qui mentionnait une liste de communes nouvelles, mais avec une date propre à cette liste mais pas une date d'effet légal.
D'ailleurs la référence légale dans Wikiépdia est elles-même devenue invalide (page non trouvée, ce devait être une ébauche basée sur la proposition du préfet mise en délibération par les communes, mais pas la version finale approuvée et officialisée le 30 septembre 2016 par la préfecture)
Verdy_p (2018-10-11 09:51:52+00:00): dates corrigées
mavl (2018-12-24 23:51:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
orhygine (2018-10-06 13:43:56+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour la résolution de la note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1338187. J'ai depuis vu que les maisons étaient présentes dans le cadastre et ai récupéré les géométries du cadastre qui sont correctes. Concernant le bâtiment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631277956 que vous avez ajouté, je ne suis pas sûr qu'il s'agisse d'un bâtiment. Je pourrais vérifier la prochaine fois que je passerai dans le coin. Merci pour toutes ces modif et bonne cartographie.
Patchanka (2018-10-06 16:24:19+00:00): Ok. Concernant le bâtiment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631277956 j'ai pensé que c'était un transfo edf ou quelquechose du genre... A confirmer (ou pas!)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:11:24+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5961414474/history has fixme = yes that was added in this edit
What requires fixing here? fixme=yes is not particularly clear, and maybe problem got fixed since then?
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-18 18:12:34+00:00): In this case you added name=Blanchisserie

is it shop=laundry ? Is it having own name?
Arlo James Barnes (2018-10-06 23:08:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I added some details of the mall around you - just the ones that can be seen from aerial imagery like the building itself, parking spaces, roads, and trees. These can help with some of the functionality of OSM (for example, adding roads helps osm.org/directions give better driving instructions and travel time estimates). Feel free to improve this with your local knowledge, and ask any questions you have! :)
mariotomo (2020-02-14 15:33:54+00:00): otra vez la misma pregunta.  cuál es tu fuente?  si tomas fotos de los palos con la indicación del nombre de la carretera, eso ayudaría.  puedes ponerlos en mapillary.
Alvarado2510 (2020-02-15 02:01:05+00:00): Gracias por el dato, lo tendré en cuenta, la próxima vez que pase por allí.
mariotomo (2020-02-17 01:08:45+00:00): según el MOP (https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=82504ec837ba41be8f689217a465970b&extent=-84.5875,6.0613,-76.4741,10.7281), el número es 28.  lo he mejorado.
mariotomo (2020-03-22 21:50:27+00:00): (no me contestaste a siempre la misma pregunta: "cuál es tu fuente?", en este caso para el número 91.)
viloan (2018-10-06 13:16:36+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:14:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pangoSE (2018-10-27 19:49:36+00:00): Hej
Tog en titt. 
Ser bra ut bortsett från att den är sned. Känner du till hur man rätar upp i iD? Högerklicka eller tast "s".
Om gräsutan är större än själva planen här så föreslår jag att du ritar en landuse=grass överallt där gräset är.
Mvh
Egil
mavl (2018-12-25 00:19:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Carto'Cité (2018-10-12 10:36:06+00:00): Bonjour _phiphou_

J'ai corrigé le cycleway:right=track sur le rond point parce qu'il est déjà décrit en way indépendant. S'il manque des portions de piste cyclable, il faudrait continuer de les décrire en way indépendants selon moi.

À ta disposition pour en discuter.

Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
Carto'Cité (2018-10-12 10:40:47+00:00): J'ai aussi vu que tu avais regroupé les portions du rond point en un seul élément. Je pense qu'il était coupé pour les besoins de relations de bus et je ne crois pas qu'il soit bon de supprimer les portions.

Charles de Carto’Cité
GerdP (2022-11-13 06:48:10+00:00): Moin!
Was ist hier denn schief gegangen?
Der Weg https://www.osm.org/way/25632426 hat sicherlich keinen Radweg, genausowenig wie weiter nördlich und südlich. Habe das korrigiert: https://www.osm.org/changeset/128835123
user_404333 (2022-11-13 07:54:43+00:00): ???
Hier gibt es definitiv keinen Radweg.
GerdP (2022-11-13 14:33:46+00:00): In Version 13 war er noch da ;)
zstadler (2018-10-08 05:55:41+00:00): Hello posix99,
.
Thanks again for your contributions to the OSM maps! 
.
In this edit/changeset you have updated the green trail. Was there also a change in the Golan Trail and/or the "שביל דרום הגולן" bike trail?
.
Thanks,
Zeev
posix99 (2018-10-09 05:51:14+00:00): according to my understanding it includes golan trail. as i followed the green-blue-white stripes.
I did not see marks of the bike trail, then i suppose that one was not changed (which is logical because current track is white road).
zstadler (2018-10-09 12:35:41+00:00): Thanks!
I've updated the route relations accordingly.
DD1GJ (2018-10-06 22:39:31+00:00): Hallo Herr Batz,

herzlichen Dank für das Überprüfen der Rettungspunkte. 

Allerdings ist der von Dir verwendete Bildschirmhintergrund topo_bkg von outdodooractive.com urheberrechtlich geschützt und dar daher nicht für OSM-Zwecke verwendet werden. Zudem ist die Karte total veraltet und durch die Generalisierung insbesondere zur Korrektur von Wegen oder Berggipfeln ungeeignet.

An besten ist derzeit das Esri-Luftbild.

Viele Grüße, Joachim
zstadler (2018-10-08 05:50:06+00:00): Hello posix99!
.
Thank you for your contributions to the OSM maps!
.
In this changeset you have added a red colour to a trail near HaOn.
.
I cannot see this as a marked trail in the marked trails map (מפת סימון שבילים).
.
Can you describe what is the source of this colour? What kind of marks do you see there?
.
Thanks again,
Zeev
posix99 (2018-10-09 05:48:59+00:00): the color is based on what i have seen in the field. there was a merk white-red-white on the track i marked.
Hjart (2018-10-06 15:24:47+00:00): The differences in this area are negligible, but I'll still recommend using the national danish aerial imagery SDFE when mapping in Denmark.
MapperJannis (2018-10-07 07:11:53+00:00): Okay, thank you
eggie (2018-10-06 15:19:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-10-06 15:22:33+00:00): Een van je voetpaden is alleen een lijn zonder tags. Verder zitten de voetpaden vastgekleefd aan de landuse. Dat moet je proberen te voorkomen. Wanneer je de linker alt toets inhoudt plakt editor iD niet.
eggie (2018-10-06 15:23:01+00:00): Dit waren je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63258602
eggie (2018-10-06 15:45:08+00:00): Ik heb de paden weer losgemaakt van de landuse en wat footwaytags toegevoegd op de lege lijnen.
eggie (2018-10-06 15:59:48+00:00): Zag er verder netjes uit.  Wel nog twee bruggen toegevoegd op je paden. . 
highway=bridge
layer=1
Voor de rest nuttige bijdragen.
literan (2018-10-07 10:56:40+00:00): добрый день. Не забывайте, пожалуйста, в места пересечения автодорог и пешеходных дорожек добавлять общие точки (и ставить на них основной тег пешеходного перехода - highway=crossing). А зебры и пеликаны не нужны, это английская классификация переходов, их я удалил
salikoff (2018-10-08 00:14:03+00:00): Ок, спасибо
gileri (2018-10-06 18:58:22+00:00): Bonjour,

S'agit-il de terrasse publiques ?
leisure=common implique une ouverture publique.
dktue (2018-10-07 10:05:16+00:00): Motiviert durch Qwaves 3D-Mapping in Tübingen? :-)
eggie (2018-10-06 15:26:55+00:00): In OSM worden restaurants, winkels meestal op de (adres)nodes getagd en dus niet op de gebouwen. Het zijn niet altijd de namen van het gebouw zelf. Je hebt dit juist allemaal veranderd van de voorgaande mapper. Dus restaurants, cafe's bij voorkeur op de node taggen.
laurent-38 (2018-10-10 09:39:23+00:00): Bonjour Sebast38, 
suite à ton intervention, j’ai fait 2 modifications. 
Mise à jour du carrefour rue de la gare/rue des écoles :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63373742
Relais postal dans supérette Vival : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63372582
N’hésite pas à commenter si nécessaire.
Cordialement
~~
laurent-38
mueschel (2018-10-12 09:39:48+00:00): Hi,
you added the tag "case=yes" to many objects. Could you explain what this means? 

Thanks, Jan
Hjart (2018-10-06 16:15:09+00:00): Kopierede du tags fra en eksisterende bygning her?
LarsBG (2018-10-06 19:15:40+00:00): ? ikke forstået. Så måske....
Hjart (2018-10-06 19:24:17+00:00): Det er fordi de nye bygninger har nogle specielle koder, f.eks. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631316270
LarsBG (2018-10-06 19:45:00+00:00): Det ser ud til der var 2. De er fjernet nu.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:07:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
dktue (2018-10-19 13:51:39+00:00): Wenn Du zusätzlich das Tag service=driveway anhängst ist klar, dass es sich um eine Grundstückszufahrt handelt und die wird auch anders gerendert.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:service%3Ddriveway
mavl (2018-11-08 11:40:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64288571 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
AlaskaDave (2018-10-07 01:09:27+00:00): Another source is 
Surface Waters of the Seward Peninsula, Smith & Brooks, 1913
czubi (2018-10-07 09:20:14+00:00): Der Forstmannstein war schon vorhanden. Sicher das es den 2x gibt.
Monument nimmt man nur für begehbare Denkmäler. Ich kenne ihn nicht.
czubi (2018-10-07 09:22:12+00:00): Sehe gerade es sind 2 Verschiedene Inschriften. Gibts den wirklich 2x?
Die Inschrift kannst Du mit inscription="" nachtragen
viloan (2018-10-06 16:01:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
lakedistrict (2018-10-28 19:23:00+00:00): Hi dazzac, thanks for all these edits around Newcastle. There's now 2 Purple Bears https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5961871386 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4415157358 so one will need deleting. Is it more of a restaurant or pub?
SomeoneElse (2018-10-08 13:18:51+00:00): Re "All other London Airport on OSM are called London (name) Airport" so what?  Just because X is called X doesn't mean that Y is also called X.

For the record, Heathrow does not self-identify as "London Heathrow".  See https://www.heathrow.com/ for example.
viloan (2018-10-06 16:08:55+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Fadlilaa IRM-RV (2020-09-20 23:53:23+00:00): I made some improvement in your work based on Maxar Premium Imagery.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:25:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-11-08 03:15:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64272210 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source egrp365.ru].
pio2_122 (2018-10-07 09:13:55+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniłeś te drogi na track?
Są one asfaltowe...
pio2_122 (2018-10-07 10:09:11+00:00): W związku z aktywnością, a brakiem odpowiedzi - wycofałem.
nikt-- (2018-10-17 15:54:42+00:00): W tym obszarze wiele dróg było podanych jako "residential" mieszkalne albo "service" - niepubliczne pomocnicze drogi podjazdowe. Jeśli popełniłem błędy - proszę śmiało korygować.
pio2_122 (2018-10-17 16:14:22+00:00): Dzięki za wyjaśnienie. Faktycznie w tym rejonie jest "bajzel" ze wszystkim, od adresów po drogi - a to wszystko dzięki jakiemuś nieogarniętemu maperowi :/ W wolnej chwili postaram się też tutaj coś poprawiać.
Robert46798 (2018-10-08 07:14:45+00:00): Hallo Rainer,

danke für deine Ergänzung.
Wenn das der offizielle Name ist, wie er bspw. am Eingang steht, dann passt das so. Ich habe mal noch ein 'amenity=kindergarden' eingefügt, um es als Kindergarten zu kennzeichnen.

Bezüglich deines Änderungssatzkommentars ist mir noch etwas aufgefallen. Dort wo du "Ortskenntnis" reingeschrieben hast, sollte eine kurze Erläuterung dessen stehen was du gemacht hast. Für die Quelle gibt es ein extra Feld. Dafür unter dem eben genannten Feld bei 'Feld hinzufügen' 'Quelle' auswählen und dann entsprechend die Quelle eintragen. Dann steht alles da wo es soll.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
pangoSE (2018-10-07 22:02:51+00:00): Välkommen till OSM.
Visst är det kul?
Jag gillade att du ritade in service-vägarna. Bekymra dig inte så mycket om hur det ser ut på osm.org. 
Se https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63291026
Mvh
Egil
PS: Gå gärna med i en Telegram-chat, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/List_of_OSM_centric_Telegram_accounts
Finns även en specifikt för SE.
zstadler (2018-10-08 06:07:00+00:00): Hi Zohar,
.
Please note that OSM uses the "colour" spelling for the tag rather than "color".
.
I've corrected the spelling for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/263194949
.
Thanks,
Zeev
Sanniu (2020-01-21 09:40:47+00:00): All paths in this changeset are not connected to the nearby paths/roads. Can you connect where appropriate?
Harel M (2020-01-21 10:13:30+00:00): Thanks for the info, but I'm not entirely sure how to connect it.
the entire west side is more like a concrete sidewalk.
Having said that, I did wanted to map it as a distinct road.
should I use the sidewalk tag in this case?
Here's an image I found that can illustrate it (look at the left side).
https://anattour.co.il/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/%D7%92%D7%A9%D7%A8-%D7%94%D7%A6%D7%91%D7%99%D7%9D-%D7%A0%D7%97%D7%9C-%D7%90%D7%9C%D7%9B%D7%A1%D7%A0%D7%93%D7%A8-%D7%A6%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%9D-%D7%93%D7%A8-%D7%90%D7%91%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%99-%D7%98%D7%99%D7%99%D7%9B%D7%A8.jpg
Sanniu (2020-01-21 10:17:57+00:00): Yes, that is the great ambiguity always. IMO it is good to mark as sidewalk and connect to road at the ends to make routing engine and people checking where is the entrance to the park happy. BTW, is there path there from parking at the south side?
Harel M (2020-01-21 10:55:10+00:00): Thanks.
Fixes can be found here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/79849720
Mike Baggaley (2018-10-19 08:49:40+00:00): How much the road is used is irrelevant to the classification. In the UK If it has a ref beginning with an A , it is either a primary or trunk. If it is a B road, it is secondary. Please see the UK tagging guidelines at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines .

If this segment of road is still the A374 then please revert the highway back to primary. If it is no longer part of the A374, please remove the ref and change the highway to tertiary, unless it has been downgraded to a B road, in which case please change the ref as appropriate.

Thanks,
Mike
RaccoonFederation (2018-10-19 09:30:26+00:00): I believe the road classification has changed and have contaced the local council to confirm it's new classification.
zstadler (2018-10-07 06:55:00+00:00): ,OSM-שלום זוהר וברוך הבא ל
.
בעריכה זו הוספת קטע קצר יחסית של שביל ג'פים שמסומן בסימון ירוק
.
אני לא רואה את השביל הזה במפת סימון שבילים 
.
?למי שייך הסימון הירוק
.
בברכה,
זאב
Zohar Kolberg (2018-10-07 07:09:20+00:00): תוקן
חוסר הבנה שלי בעניין הצבעים במפה
rivermont (2019-12-07 06:00:12+00:00): Hi,
please know that the Esri Clarity layer uses imagery (at least in this area) from around 2011. At least a few of the buildings you added here do not exist and are not visible on any other layers. Clarity is also offset by a couple meters from the other layers and probably reality.  
Even though it's sharper than the other layers (thus named Clarity) it is almost never the newest or third-newest imagery.
Twotert (2018-10-06 19:17:59+00:00): +wegtype mutatie naar toegangsweg met private gate
eggie (2018-10-06 20:09:34+00:00): Je zou de service-road ook nog op access=private kunnen zetten.
Twotert (2018-10-06 20:14:38+00:00): Ik heb het aangepast
eggie (2018-10-06 20:15:06+00:00): Top!
Elisabeth IRM-RV (2020-09-10 02:05:09+00:00): Hello Sal73x,
I've changed the geometry of this way-731370042 based on Maxar Premium Imagery, thank you
Twotert (2018-10-06 19:32:05+00:00): Verkeerde commentaar, excuses, Ik heb paaltjes toegevoegd met de tags
eggie (2018-10-06 20:07:13+00:00): Dag Timo,
Die access tags zijn "default". Die hoef je er niet op te zetten. Een auto routeert niet langs een paaltje behalve als je =yes invult. fiets en voetganger routeert automatisch. 
Groet,
Eggie
Twotert (2018-10-06 20:09:11+00:00): Oké, bedankt voor de tip!
eggie (2018-10-06 20:02:53+00:00): Kijk eben hier als het echt om een specifiek ruiterpad gaat..
highway=bridleway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbridleway
GerdP (2018-10-16 06:31:46+00:00): Hi! I've noticed this changeset because of the unusual tag highway=other. Please don't invent new road types! I see that you try to map road areas here. 
Why do you add area=yes to ways with area:highway=*? 
When you change a highway from tertiary to secondary please remember to change the corresponding area:highway ways as well, see e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/575222925
dvdhoven (2018-10-07 05:43:37+00:00): Je hebt wegen doorverbonden en daardoor zijn er routerelaties kapot gegaan, oa een wandelroute en meerdere busroutes. 
Vanaf nu geen wegen meer doorverbinden want wegen moeten doorgeknipt zijn en blijven om af te kunnen slaan.
In ID kun je niet goed zien of er routerelaties lopen en ID waarschuwt ook niet als je routerelaties stuk maakt.
Als je serieus met OSM aan de slag witl gaan, moet je overstappen op JOSM, de enige echte editor voor OSM.

Ik ga deze changeset terug draaien, ik heb geen zin om alle relaties handmatig te gaan herstellen.
Daarbij gaat helaas werk van jou verloren, dus dat zul je zelf moeten herstellen.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
routespecialist OSM
dvdhoven (2018-10-07 05:47:28+00:00): Changeset reverted with my changeset 63270814
eggie (2018-10-07 06:17:56+00:00): editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
JulesGabrielVerne (2019-01-02 23:25:03+00:00): Nabrzeże Pomorskie chyba nie istnieje...ale poszperam jeszcze
pio2_122 (2019-01-03 08:44:26+00:00): 5 lat temu może istniało :D
Trzy miesiące temu dodałem tylko odpowiednie tagi dla już istniejących w OSM nabrzeży, ale nie sprawdzałem ich poprawności.

Teraz jednak z dużą pewnością nie istnieje, ponieważ nie widnieje na żadnym wykazie. Nie mam pojęcia, co się z nim stało...
zgroza (2018-10-08 16:59:29+00:00): Nie wiem... przynajmniej się nie wyświetla na głównym poziomie zoomu, starałem się użyć tagi tak jak w https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3582694. Swoją drogą, to nie są w pełni uzasadnione granice Kaszub...
Jrachi (2023-11-20 07:52:32+00:00): Case Fago non è un luogo abitato, in modo permanente.
Sarebbe più corretto locality.