piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
timmito (2021-10-11 22:58:08+00:00): Hallo mihof, Danke für die Ergänzung. Durch das landuse=construction wird das im Bau ja schon ausgedrückt. Mit construction=residential kann man attributieren, dass es ein Wohngebiet wird. Ich habe es angepasst. Siehe auch: Name is the name only. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
EneaSuper (2021-10-12 13:49:03+00:00): Errata corrige: gli edifici sono esistiti, ma fino a molti anni fa.
Jakka (2021-10-13 07:18:33+00:00): Het type highway ontbrak.
CoyKoi (2021-10-14 22:12:19+00:00): Hi, welcome again and thanks for the edit. You have requested a review of the changeset.

From what I read on the wiki, either of the tags are suitable for these pile moorings. So man_made=dolphin was OK, but so is seamark:type=pile. Neither of those tags are rendered on the default OSM map, so you won't see any changes there. However you can see your new features on specialised viewers like https://www.openseamap.org/

One minor thing to note is that you have deleted the existing nodes, and added new nodes. It is preferable to update existing nodes (which you did do, for a couple), as this preserves the history of the data. For future reference: in the editor, you can select multiple features, and update their tags all at once.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112389292
adiatmad (2021-10-14 08:46:28+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM! Your edits look great. But I'm wondering the meaning of the building name
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/992034565)

Is that your internal tag or something else?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112389829
mappinglander (2021-10-16 17:29:31+00:00): Merhabalar, bu düzenlemenin neden oluşturulduğunu açıklayabilir misiniz? oluşturduğunuz yerlerde herhangi bir cami yok.
Dodko (2023-07-06 16:23:47+00:00): Prečo ste na cyklotrasu dali zákaz vstupu access=no ?
Milo12 (2023-07-07 13:40:29+00:00): Kludne to upravte, za rok sa vela veci zmení. Nie je problém. Neviem presne identifikovat, ktorý segment myslite.
salvoconducto (2021-10-11 19:59:48+00:00): Please only upload straightened (shortkey Q) buildings! These are unusable.
Dodko (2022-01-03 09:20:21+00:00): Tento koniec cesty https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/992037501 nie je napojený na Muškátovú?
Ak nie tak mu chýba značka
noexit=yes
vulasala (2021-10-12 06:20:33+00:00): Hi Bryan Supply Chain,
Trust you are doing well. I have fixed the validation errors at way 992039928 ,way 992039931, and way 686011300, as the building polygons overlapping with highways.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112390509
vulasala (2021-10-12 05:39:46+00:00): Hi anu santhanam,
Trust you are doing well. I have deleted the way 992045876 and way 992045877,as these are creating duplicate ways and classification gap.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112391396
stev (2021-10-11 21:45:26+00:00): Hi there. I suggest you map addresses with the tags in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr rather than using the name=x tags, as this is usually to show named buildings, e.g. office blocks or public buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112391756
Taksine (2024-09-16 06:35:28+00:00): 太感人了😭是我错怪你了
DaveF (2021-10-12 15:53:44+00:00): Hi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/676133922

landuse=grass in not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct.
Drexite (2021-10-12 15:57:17+00:00): Noted, thank you.
bigopenmac (2023-05-03 10:32:20+00:00): Откуда информация по типам коннекторов на электрозарядках? Я вижу что отличается от информации на сайте белоруснефти 
https://azs.belorusneft.by/beloil-map/station?lang=ru&id=875BCF5C0CFE7AD9E053BF0BA8C0BBAB
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9165931550
salvoconducto (2021-10-11 21:11:30+00:00): Ain't farmland always private?
conifermapper (2021-10-11 21:13:00+00:00): Yes so I always tag it as private- why not
salvoconducto (2021-10-11 21:18:56+00:00): Ockham's razor?
eggie (2021-10-12 05:29:28+00:00): Hi jlov
Please decrease your mapping area and don't shift the map in editmodus with editor iD. This may harm the map.
It's difficult to check your edits this way.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-10-12 05:33:04+00:00): We asked you before again and again!!!!!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74685700 and you got a block in the past from the OSM foundation mapping this way..
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-12 06:06:55+00:00): Tip:  Bij je volgende bijdrage verander dan iets bv zoals op de golfbaan en vervolgens doe je een upload. Je geeft dan als commentaar: "water en paden toegevoegd'.  Daarna ga je pas naar je volgende project zolas bij de school.
Je verwijdert dan een pad en tekent dat schuurtje.  Doet een upload met asl commentaar.. Pad verwijderd en schuur toegevoegd.
(Is er daar geen pad mee?)
Dan blijft het gebied van je edits klein en zijn je toevoegingen te controleren.
Mapse,
eggie
eggie (2021-10-12 06:16:31+00:00): Mijn edits ..  Water aangepast op golfbaan... Ooijenroute en Pieterpad deel 2 hersteld.
MVG
eggie
Dino Michelini (2021-10-12 17:57:08+00:00): Il cambiamento delle strade da track a residential non è corretto: queste strade sono utilizzate non solo da alcuni residenti (case per lo più abusive) ma soprattutto da aziende agricole per la produzione di legname, nocciole, fieno. Per poter mappare una strada come residential non basta vedere degli edifici ma occorre che il luogo abbia le caratteristiche di una area residenziale (fogne, acquedotto, parcheggi, rete elettrica, ecc.) vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Residential. Ti segnalo inoltre che in questo changeset hai modificato i limiti del perimetro del Parco regionale di Bracciano e Martignano. Infine, il commento al changeset non risponde a quanto richiesto dalla wiki di OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Tags_on_changesets. Per favore ripristina la corretta classificazione delle strade. Grazie
giocarch (2021-10-13 10:02:30+00:00): Che le case siano abusive non mi risulta, ci abita mio padre e tante altre persone con regolare licenza edilizia. Frequento le strade descritte e il traffico è per lo più di auto e non mezzi agricoli. Comunque no problem, cancello le modifiche. Posso tornare indietro nella cronologia o debbo rifare manualmente le modifiche?
archpdx (2021-10-12 00:30:55+00:00): Hi Edward,
As Mateusz mentioned in a previous change to this POI:
>In wikipedia/wikidata tags only entries about given feature should be linked, secondary wikipedia tags may be used in other cases. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia
The wikidata page linked in this changeset was for the company and not this specific location, and was already linked using the more appropriate brand:wikidata tag.
Edward (2021-10-12 06:14:26+00:00): Thanks archpdx. Makes sense.
Edward (2021-10-12 13:19:02+00:00): I've changed my software so it warns when there is already a brand:wikidata tag.

https://map.osm.wikidata.link/map/19/45.52266/-122.67312?item=Q7941645
sannkc (2021-10-12 01:52:53+00:00): I'm wondering if all of these paths are actually *designated* as cycleways, as opposed to being general use paths where bike usage is legal.  Most of the bicycle-related help pages suggest that a designated cycleway should have bicycle-specific signage, be part of a designated bike route network, etc.  Perhaps example S8 on the Bicycle wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle) would be the better tagging scheme for most of these park paths?
Kovoschiz (2021-10-12 12:46:28+00:00): `type=turnlanes:turns` is obsolete, abandoned, and confusing. You should use `placement=transition` and `width:start=` + `width:end=`
Kovoschiz (2021-10-12 12:49:22+00:00): It's very arbitrary to re-align only certain objects, ie roads, to a certain imagery, without any reference in the entire area.
HolloWorld (2021-10-13 16:17:10+00:00): I'm using GPX source at the same time, didn't mention in comment.
blackboxlogic (2021-11-14 13:36:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM. I've reviewed you change and made a few corrections. The biggest issue is that you were using Name to describe was something is but that's what other tags are for. Example, I could incorrectly name myself "6 foot adult male human" or I could use tags "height=6 feet", "age=adult", "gender=male" and "species=human". Descriptive tags are more machine readable and useful in OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112394845
blackboxlogic (2021-11-14 13:40:41+00:00): Oh, and you added one of your lots as a part of the official boundary of Richmond (by assigning it as a member of the relation) which is what made me look at your change. Please do be careful not to adjust town boundaries and ask if you have questions. -Alex
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112394845
vulasala (2021-10-12 04:04:53+00:00): Hi Hologaun,
Trust you are doing well. I have fixed the validation error at way 961022151 and way 627921595, as there is crossing of building polygon and highway.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112394962
Kovoschiz (2021-10-12 12:47:30+00:00): You need to use brackets to represent new lane in `connectivity=*:*,(*)|*`
HolloWorld (2021-10-13 16:17:44+00:00): your useful information had been receivied and will be use since next time !
Dawid2849 (2021-10-12 17:01:43+00:00): Dzięki za edycję!
vulasala (2021-10-13 09:20:59+00:00): Hi Hologaun,
Trust you are doing well. I have fixed the validation errors at way 788843563 and way 829824870,as there is overlapping of building polygons and highway.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112395400
philippec (2021-12-28 16:24:40+00:00): Blankenberge apotheek aed,
dient dat cijferslot tot iets ?
Ik zal morgen een mapillary van dichtbij opladen.
philippec (2021-12-28 16:25:09+00:00): https://www.cardioservice.eu/product-categorie/wandkasten-aed/
philippec (2021-12-28 17:06:38+00:00): https://www.defisign.nl/buitenkast-210/  
Het is mij nog niet duidelijk.
M!dgard (2025-02-08 22:36:42+00:00): Vandaag eens gevraagd aan de apotheker, het codeslot is niet actief: je kan de AED gewoon meenemen. Ze had de leverancier nog gevraagd naar een kast zonder codeslot, maar die had er zo geen. Door mijn vraag kreeg ze het idee om duidelijker te maken dat er geen code is. Ik stelde voor het cijferslot af te dekken. In een noodgeval is duidelijkheid (er is geen codeslot zichtbaar) beter dan een uitleg (een tekst om te zeggen dat er geen codeslot is).
M!dgard (2025-02-09 13:35:38+00:00): Nog een weetje: ze vertelde ook dat de AED gebruikt was in de oudejaarsperiode.
Glassman (2021-10-12 02:28:56+00:00): #TIP: use the tag building=yes instead of area=yes. If you know what the little building is used for you can use that instead of building=yes. Such as building=shed
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112395724
Glassman (2021-10-12 02:30:27+00:00): #TIP: We don't use descriptive names like Little Storage. Try to find a tag that best describes the building. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112395734
Lee Carré (2021-10-12 08:32:21+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

source = ?
Supaplex (2021-10-12 05:18:24+00:00): 你怎麼讓程式知道這站已經廢除了
一般人光看標籤也看不出來
建議用 life cycle 方式處理
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112395880
Supaplex (2021-10-12 05:18:18+00:00): 你怎麼讓程式知道這站已經廢除了
一般人光看標籤也看不出來
建議用 life cycle 方式處理
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112395938
Glassman (2021-10-12 02:34:48+00:00): #TIP: Sand traps, while made of sand, are tagged as golf=bunker. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course for more info
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112396124
Supaplex (2021-10-12 05:37:02+00:00): 這是 GNS 的資料，美軍的資料集，可能會偏很大，如果錯誤可以自行移動
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112396398
Glassman (2021-10-12 16:57:24+00:00): #TIP: Square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112396401
Ewen Hill (2021-10-12 02:08:25+00:00): This is the worlds best changeset comment I've seen - Chapeau!
Adam Franco (2021-10-12 13:52:03+00:00): Thanks, Ewen! :-) 

Years of software development has ingrained in me this mantra for version-control comments: What changed? Why did you change it?
jmilot (2021-10-26 17:12:39+00:00): Hi,

I've seen that you added a bunch of sidewalks and crossings in this area. However, they aren't properly connected to the main network, which might break softwares relying on OSM data. This means :
1) All ends of sidewalk should have crossings. 
2) All overlapping ways should be connected together.

Also, please, before committing changes, ensure that all the "Warnings" and "Issues" below the "Changeset Comment" field are addressed.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-10-12 21:38:34+00:00): Hi CoastalAU!

Welcome to OSM!

You've currently got this house marked as being named "Our Coast". Is that the name of the house? Do people live there or is it entirely dedicated to some form of organisation?
SomeoneElse (2021-10-12 08:17:22+00:00): Hello Siiraki and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
You've made a number of edits to Somalia and Somaliland here that will need someone to fix (see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1bXP for Somalia - the boundary of Somalia isn't a complete line any more).
Rather than making any changes that you plan on your own, I'd suggest talking to the rest of The OpenStreetMap Community in the region and internationally - see https://openstreetmap.community/ and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk .
Also, please use changeset comments that explain what you are trying to do - "fix" isn't really very helpful.
Best Regards,
Andy
AntMadeira (2021-10-12 22:16:37+00:00): Olá, SilverKnight.
Esta estrada foi passada para terciária porquê? Tem marcação no eixo da faixa de rodagem?

Cumprimentos,
António.
SilverKnight (2021-10-13 05:03:18+00:00): Olá, António. 
O troço da estrada a norte da EM 531 de facto não tem marcação, eu já alterei para rua residencial. O outro troço da estrada que liga Carnide tem marcação no eixo da faixa de rodagem. 
As estradas terciárias só se aplicam a caminhos municipais?
Obrigado.
AntMadeira (2021-10-13 14:17:38+00:00): Obrigado pelo esclarecimento.
Sim, as estradas terciárias aplicam-se a caminhos municipais e outras estradas que não tenham referência oficial, mas que têm marcação longitudinal, desde que não sejam meros acessos.
Assim sendo, a tua edição faz todo o sentido.

Qual
AntMadeira (2021-10-13 14:17:55+00:00): quer dúvida, estou ao dispor.

Cumprimentos,
António.
TomPar (2021-11-30 06:15:58+00:00): I recommend putting notes on the ways that are aligned to the stone walls.  If L3 parcels is wrong, some future well-intentioned mapper will likely repeat.  I think most people don't bother to check the history.

I'm curious: how do you know the L3 is wrong (if it is) and the stone wall is the official boundary?  Is it on the parcel map?  Thanks.
GlenAsp (2021-11-30 15:03:21+00:00): Thanks for the tip! Yeah, there aren’t any surveys for these old state forest parcels but the deeds are all as the stone walls run. The L3 for unimproved parcels around here are not very accurate but there’s almost always an old farm wall and often blazes from the State Forester.
Random Punter (2021-10-13 11:37:31+00:00): Delete this addition. Wrong location. Correct location added on neighbouring block.
nevw (2021-10-13 13:27:55+00:00): ?
Are you asking someone else to delete this or is this a note to yourself?
I am unfamiliar with the editor you are using but can delete this edit if that is what you are requesting.
nevw (2021-10-13 14:50:41+00:00): Hi
I will delete it Tomorrow. I expect that you would be unable to do this from the OsmAnd editor.
nevw (2021-10-13 22:26:26+00:00): Hi
this has been deleted now by using JOSM reverter. Thanks for letting us know.
Random Punter (2021-10-13 22:30:57+00:00): I tried to delete it myself but could not. Hence the shout out to the universe.
Thanks for fixing it for me. xx
Frans S (2021-10-12 08:43:52+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
We welcome you as a new mapper. Your mappings needs to be improved.
Please pay attention on these points:
Buildings here are in general rectangular with squared corners.  Map them accordingly.
The yard or a shadow don't need to be mapped as well. A yard can be recognized as a lighter bald spot next to a building. (zoom in far enough to get a good view)
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112397204
vulasala (2021-10-13 08:00:42+00:00): Hi Tara_Ro,
Trust you are doing well. I have fixed the validation errors at way 792779415 and way 992094927, as there is overlapping of building polygon and highway.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112397437
Adiatma IRM-RV (2021-10-12 04:28:12+00:00): I was using Maxar Premium Imagery offset 5.37; 2.24 to adjust the existing data.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112397748
santamariense (2022-03-12 15:24:41+00:00): Olá DressyPear4,
Esta changeset está bastante estranha pois você rebaixou inúmeras tertiaries para unclassified em uma área que cobre vários estados.
Parece que não foi verificada uma a uma.
Imagino que tu tenha feito alguma seleção e aplicou as modificações sem intenção a diversas tertiaries que não devia.
Exemplo de rua que parece ter tido sua classificação modificada sem ter sido inspecionada antes da modificação: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175092026/history
.
Ou essa modificação em massa era exatamente o que tu queria fazer?
[]'s
santamariense
DressyPear4 (2022-03-12 18:12:32+00:00): Não costumo editar vias em uma área tão grande, talvez eu reverti a edição de um usuário novo que tenha alterado a classificação de via, ou fiz alguma edição em uma área diferente mas em uma mesma camada, de qualquer forma hora que acessar pelo PC verifico
DressyPear4 (2022-03-13 10:22:19+00:00): De fato foi erro, era pra ser apenas no interior da cidade de Leopoldina MG, mas acabou selecionando mais do que deveria.
Fiz as correções.
santamariense (2022-03-13 14:22:27+00:00): Beleza!
ivanbranco (2021-10-13 08:01:20+00:00): Hi,

tags are in english language by OSM standard, what's the meaning of diet:飲料?
catdreamer (2021-10-12 12:18:59+00:00): 武雄橋與進涇橋都毀於風災了，實質上不存在
rudychung (2021-10-12 12:34:18+00:00): 原來是這樣，了解。我來把 naming 恢復原狀. ^^
rudychung (2021-10-12 12:37:07+00:00): Done.  XD

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112416649
Snalla (2021-10-13 09:57:35+00:00): Corrected street name #MSFTOpenMaps
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112399050
abakus_uploader (2021-10-12 22:31:55+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Glassman (2021-10-12 17:00:11+00:00): #TIP: The building outline should match the imagery. Can you redo these. Also, you can square the building by just selecting the outline then just type a "a"

#TIP: If you don't know the name of the park, don't add a descriptive name. Someone may come along and add it later.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112399307
nevw (2021-10-12 05:38:55+00:00): Hi
do these trees actually have names?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things
nevw (2021-10-24 03:04:53+00:00): no response, retagged individual trees from natural=wood to natural=tree, deleted names
rajkumar ch (2021-10-12 05:27:56+00:00): Source given as wrong
Correct Source:Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta);data.sa.gov.au;Mapillary Imagery
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Kovoschiz (2021-10-12 12:54:51+00:00): `access=permit` is not correct when `access=` covers all modes, and `=permit` should mean a license obtainable (this should not be blindly applied in HK as `=private` also uses "permit" sign)
HolloWorld (2021-10-13 16:23:29+00:00): it's not just bus can enter bus also bus company owened private car and repair vehicle. so i'm confused, checked wiki, will use private since.
MxxCon (2021-10-13 01:15:28+00:00): Hello.
Shouldn't that description be on the whole building and not just the internal part of it?
Also, is it even correct to have it at all there? OSM is about the way the map is NOW, not about stuff that's "now long gone".👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112402375
Unggo99 (2021-10-13 02:48:16+00:00): The pavilion is open in the middle with the missing glass roof, so I guess it is technically correct? The description is more towards the old open floor area, which I added just for additional historic information purposes.
MxxCon (2021-10-13 03:30:05+00:00): Actually, looking at various satellite imagery and just googling for photos of the inside of that thing, it seems like there's a pretty crude outline of NYS inside. It seems like it's perimetered by bricks/cinderblocks. I don't know if that's preservation effort of the original map or something new, but perhaps it's worth mapping it?🤔