piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
StalkerOSM (2018-01-23 09:37:38+00:00): Dziękuję za odpowiedź na komentarz w sprawie Ługowiny. To prawdopodobnie pomyłka. Na Geoportalu Dolnego Śląska Ługowina jest zaznaczona jako owal obejmujący fragment doliny potoku wpadającego do Ścinawki od zachodu (prawy dopływ). W Geoportalu krajowym na mapie wektorowej faktycznie ten szczyt jest oznaczony jako Ługowina. Na mapie rastrowej nie ma nazwy. Obstawiam, że to pomyłka. Przy okazji: w jaki sposób dostać się do PRNG i przeglądać go? Trzeba go zamówić czy jest ogólnodostępny?
Rzezimierz (2018-01-23 10:16:47+00:00): Darmowy, dostepny tutaj: http://www.codgik.gov.pl/index.php/darmowe-dane/prng.html
Możesz skopiować sobie ID wzięty z taga "ref:prng" i po tym identyfikatorze znaleźć odpowiedni wpis w Excelu.
StalkerOSM (2018-01-23 10:22:43+00:00): Dzięki!
mavl (2018-12-25 20:14:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:58:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:06:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:30:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:37:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:29:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:21:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Glassman (2017-04-15 14:12:04+00:00): It looks like you added a park inside of the existing Luke McRedmond Landing park. I removed it.
RossAlGhul (2017-04-15 14:38:10+00:00): Thanks, I didn't see the larger park area, I'll be more careful in the future.
Glassman (2017-04-15 14:50:16+00:00): No problem - Map is constantly being improved. Thanks for your changes.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:45:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Dalkvist (2017-04-15 09:04:35+00:00): Hej, kul att du vill hjälpa till att göra kartan bättre. 

Om du har några funderingar så får du gärna skicka ett meddelande till mig.
Hjart (2017-04-15 08:33:47+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dit bidrag. 
Bemærk dog at det ikke duer at lægge nye stier/veje oven i eksisterende stier og at jeg derfor har slettet din løberute. Er der tale om en skiltet/markeret rute er der andre måder at angive den på
mavl (2018-12-25 21:01:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:53:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:48:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:55:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
demon_box (2017-04-15 13:08:51+00:00): ciao, name:it=Gabbia laminatoio è inutile e sbagliato perchè identico al valore del tag name
grazie.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:11:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:47:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
tontonfabrice (2023-06-05 16:19:59+00:00): Bonjour, pouvez vous m'indiquer à quoi correspond le N°29 du circuit"Autour du lac Altenweiher", je n'ai rien trouvé sur le terrain.
merci
tontonfabrice (2023-06-14 15:38:23+00:00): Bonjour, si vous ne me donnez pas les sources de ce circuit, nous allons devoir le supprimer car on ne trouve aucun N°29 sur le terrain.
Adrien G (2023-06-14 19:19:42+00:00): Bonjour,
Il me semble que la rando vient d'un guide de rando des Vosges, et j'ai du reprendre le numéro…
Malheureusement 6 ans après, je ne me souvient plus du guide ! C'est probablement celui du club vosgien.
À l'époque, les circuits de rando était bien moins complet dans OSM,
Adrien G (2023-06-14 19:20:29+00:00): je vois que ça a bien changé ! Peut-être qu'il n'est pas utile de conserver cette rando, vu que les autres (balisées) existent dans OSM
zors1843 (2017-04-15 11:10:18+00:00): Op AGIV staat de "Herisbleukenweg" bekend als "Bosweg".  Wat is correct ?
kenny_tmt (2017-04-16 07:06:55+00:00): Het is effectief een voetweg hoor, ik kan een  foto nemen van het gele bord met Herisbleukenweg op.
Harry Wood (2017-05-08 14:03:12+00:00): I see this edit was undone. Unsurprisingly there was no need to re-map Buckingham Palace. Already in as a relation with tourism=attraction tag http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5208404
mavl (2018-12-25 21:21:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:05:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
dieterdreist (2017-04-15 14:16:40+00:00): Via Montefalcone non poteva essere unita, perché aveva proprietà diverse su alcuni tratti (maxheight, oneway)
mavl (2018-12-25 20:29:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:45:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:57:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:03:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:55:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:32:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:33:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Commodoortje (2017-04-15 10:29:33+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleren middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.

Klik op de link om een reactie te geven.
Commodoortje (2017-04-15 10:48:05+00:00): Visser en Ko zit volgens haar website niet aan de Vissersdijk.
https://www.visserenko.nl/bezoek-ons/
literan (2017-04-17 10:17:10+00:00): приветствую! А что, действительно ручей прям из центра Патриаршего пруда начинается https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/55.76412/37.59173 ? Может, все же к краю его подсоединить - обычно так делают для истоков, начинающихся в болоте или озере
Zverik (2017-04-17 11:06:41+00:00): Я не уверен, что пруд и коллектор сообщаются. Википедия пишет: « Исток находился <...> на месте болота Патриаршие пруды». Болото было чуть больше, из него вытекали три ручья с разных сторон. Я не уверен, что в Патриаршем проточная вода.
literan (2017-04-17 11:17:16+00:00): Так если 'находился' - то почему не historic=stream, а waterway=stream? Может, и нет там трубы никакой под землей... на месте моего дома вот деревня находилась когда-то :)
Zverik (2017-04-17 11:19:39+00:00): Труба есть, только я их рисую с очень малой точностью. Метров в пятьсот :) Дальше их, по уму, нужно скормить диггерам, чтобы они по люкам поправили. Пара ручьёв у меня именно по люкам и нарисована, но диггеры в общем случае не любят рисовать подробные карты.
literan (2017-04-17 11:25:43+00:00): ... и их вполне можно понять :)
mavl (2018-12-25 21:20:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:53:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
user_5359 (2017-04-17 19:26:36+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte lies Dir mal dringend https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dbench durch. Wenn Du eine Sitzbank meinst (so läßt Dein Kommentar rückschließen), dann wäre der Knoten mit amenity=bench zu Kennzeichen (ohne Name).
mavl (2018-12-25 21:14:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:31:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 20:51:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
tomhukins (2017-04-15 15:28:37+00:00): Hi, thank you for improving OpenStreetMap.  I notice you've added a "building=Lemonade_Building" tag to the Barclays branch.  That's an unconventional value for the building tag: the commonly used values are listed at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building?uselang=en-GB
BCNorwich (2017-04-15 17:01:57+00:00): Amended Barclays address
tomhukins (2017-04-15 18:26:21+00:00): BCNorwich, it looks like you've removed the building tag altogether.  I expect this is because it exists on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/313501588 so I wonder if it makes sense to tag the address there.  There's also https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4794857689 which repeats the building's name.
BCNorwich (2017-04-15 18:58:57+00:00): Hi, yes the building tag is there as building=apartments (18 levels), the bank is just one of those levels (level=0 is ground floor). The POI is needed if you want the building name to show in rendering (the building name in the banks tags is part of the address tagging, which is not rendered).
I think I've got that right. Regards
BCNorwich (2017-04-15 19:02:36+00:00): Second thoughts. The building name could go on the apartments outline as name=Lemonade Building which will be rendered. Thus the POI can be removed.
mavl (2018-12-25 21:48:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:56:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
elgolfo (2017-05-06 20:29:45+00:00): teilweise änderungen in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48461279 repariert
mavl (2018-12-25 19:48:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2017-04-17 14:35:31+00:00): Здравствуйте. Хотел обсудить с вами кольцо возле Исетского:
  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/56.48954/65.35446  
  
Раньше все части кольца имели статус trunk. Сейчас некоторые фрагменты имеют класс primary, что нарушает связность дорожного графа, так как если двигаться со стороны Исетского в сторону Тюмени (проехать 3/4 кольца) дорога будет иметь классы primary-trunk-primary-trunk. Кроме того, знаки приоритета расставлены так, что все части кольца относятся к главной дороге и имеют одинаковую важность.  
Не возражаете, если все статус всех частей кольца будет снова trunk?
mavl (2017-04-20 16:36:59+00:00): Здравствуйте ещё раз. Я посоветовался с одним участником из Тюменской области, который хорошо разбирается в статусах дорог. Он поддержал идею о том, что всё кольцо должно иметь статус trunk. Я изменил статус дорог на кольце.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:21:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 19:51:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2018-12-25 21:52:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Constable (2017-12-15 18:08:40+00:00): Hi, why did you add this parking lot here?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/486952342
it looks to me like a field, not a parking lot
sorcrosc (2017-04-16 10:40:46+00:00): please do not change tagging at your choice. leisure=racetrack is a proposed tag:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/leisure%3Dracetrack
sorcrosc (2017-04-16 20:27:48+00:00): Reverted.
Please also start commenting your changesets. It's a pity a user with so many chengesets around the world doesn't give any information and reply to comments from other users
mavl (2018-12-25 21:21:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Владимир К (2017-04-19 07:45:52+00:00): А вы откуда данные берете?
Антон Голиков (2017-04-19 08:54:28+00:00): Данные берутся из собственных иследований Я живу в этом городе более 30 лет и знаю его от и до ! В яндекс и гугл о нашем городе практически ничего нет ! Потому и мы замарочились с ее прорисовкой
mavl (2018-12-25 21:07:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
ChillyDL (2024-07-20 18:48:52+00:00): Hallo Geozeisig,
du hattest vor sieben Jahren Reste eines Großsteingrabes bei Löwenbruch eingezeichnet. Kannst du etwas mehr zu den Quellen sagen? Das Grab kann ich nirgendwo in den einschlägigen Publikationen finden, auch nicht im Denkmalatlas. Dort allerdings ist tatsächlich ein Löwenbrucher Großsteingrab eingetragen (130368), das liegt aber wo ganz anders, 1 km nordwestlich.
geozeisig (2024-07-21 06:21:47+00:00): Du hast schon recht, dass ich durch eine Web-Anwendung darauf aufmerksam geworden bin. Welche kann ich jetzt nicht sagen, vielleicht fällt es mir ja noch ein. Jedenfalls war ich vor Ort und hab den Stein gefunden und ihn fotografiert.
geozeisig (2024-07-21 08:50:05+00:00): Wer sucht, der findet: das war wohl das Megalithic Portal.
Einen Link findet man auf der Seite https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:megalith_type ganz unten.
ChillyDL (2024-07-21 09:53:04+00:00): Danke! Ich frage mal dort. Der Text des ursprünglichen Eintrags "probable remains of the Loewenbruch dolmen" dort klingt etwas so, als ob "the Loewenbruch dolmen"- also 130368 - womöglich fälschlich verortet wurde.
eggie (2017-04-15 14:04:25+00:00): Access=private is voldoende anders krijg je weer allerlei uitzonderingen
Snowscooter, bicycle...
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-04-16 08:47:16+00:00): Dwie sprawy:
1. Budynki nie mają kątów prostych. Do prostowania kątów służy skrót S w iD, a Q w edytorze JOSM.
2. Proszę nie dodawać adresów, bo ułomność edytora iD sprawia, że dodajesz adresy niepoprawnie oznaczone. Po prostu rysuj obrysy, adresy (te z punktów) zostaną zintegrowane z obrysami przy następnej aktualizacji adresacji z iMPA.
Pozdrawiam
maraf24 (2017-04-15 12:51:27+00:00): Cześć
Fajnie by było, gdybyś przy kolejnych edycjach starał się rysować parki w rzeczywistych granicach, a nie na domach czy rondach.
Pozdrawiam, miłego mapowania.
AdrianRabarbarr (2017-04-16 12:11:03+00:00): Cześć. Dzięki za uwagi. Muszę nabrać wprawy w rysowaniu. Następnym razem postaram się o większą precyzję.
chillly (2017-04-15 12:13:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM
Thanks for the detail.
I would expect that a green space given mostly to sports pitches would be a recreation ground not a park. What do you think?
MasterThomasG (2017-04-16 16:16:53+00:00): This area is called Warner's Bridge park, like the name suggests it's a park granted living close it may seem's it's also a recreational ground but it's called a park so I added it as a park. Thanks for the comment hope for a reply.😀
chillly (2017-04-16 16:20:32+00:00): In OSM terms any green space that is mostly laid out with sports pitches is a recreation ground. It is a fine line. The name suggests the ambiguity. Looking again I would make it a rec, but it's not my local area.
MasterThomasG (2017-04-16 16:22:51+00:00): I see where your coming from, So OK I'll change it to a recreational area asap.😀
eggie (2017-04-15 13:23:35+00:00): De bezinepomp stond er 2x op. Nu dus aangepast. building=yes en building =roof
Het rendert anders allemaal niet en je ziet alleen 2x een pomp.
Wanner je vragen heb.. stel ze gerust.
eggie (2017-04-15 13:00:40+00:00): reverted due to ignorance
eggie (2017-04-15 13:00:30+00:00): reverted due to ignorance
eggie (2017-04-15 13:00:20+00:00): reverted due to ignorance
eggie (2017-04-15 12:59:56+00:00): reverted due to ignorance
eggie (2017-04-15 12:46:39+00:00): Je mapt nu landuse grass over het bos. Dat lijkt me niet correct.
Ook de naam hondenuitlaatplaats is geen aardijkskundige naam.
eggie (2017-04-15 12:49:35+00:00): area yes en landuse=gras met name is geen osm manier om te mappen.
Vraag op het forum hoe je een hondenuitlaatplaats kunt mappen.
sorry..Ik ga reverten..
eggie (2017-04-15 12:59:30+00:00): reverted gras op bos en geen aardrijkskundige naam.
Vraag even op he forum hoe zo iets kan. Nu rendert zo'n naam hondenspeelplaats nummer  .. helemaal over de kaart. 
Je kunt beter met iets van paadjes beginne in een bosgebied of bv de bankjes toevoegen of lossen bomen op het gras. natural=tree.
mavl (2018-12-25 20:12:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65765733, 65762676, 65758117, 65761081, 65759598, 65754732, 65764253 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
chillly (2017-04-15 12:16:49+00:00): Doggetts Park looks like a recreation ground to me.
MasterThomasG (2017-04-16 16:24:28+00:00): Going there often it's got a small park and isn't often used for football and other activities it's just a large area with trees. Any ideas?😀