piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jpennycook (2021-11-06 18:22:36+00:00): Hi!

You've changed the values for tracktype for these two tracks off Newton Lane:-
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28557785/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97248754/history

The tracks are just dirt/grass with fallen leaves without much hardcore except at the ends - I tried to cycle on them today and found it difficult.  Can I ask what the source of your information is?
According to the wiki, tracktype=grade2 is "Solid but unpaved.", and grade3 is "Mostly solid." In particular, I would expect tracktype=grade2 to correspond to surface=compacted/gravel, not to surface=ground (which implies no or little hardcore).
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=945507342880264
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=4111408432312293

Jon
jpennycook (2021-11-06 21:27:38+00:00): Hello again.

Video footage showing the byways: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQo5NYGheWc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tF06q2wLdaU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLH7caqRBuQ

Jon
Jordi MF (2021-11-10 20:14:45+00:00): Hola Jose,
Te escribo con motivo del nombre que has introducido en esta senda. "Senda paso de los zampones" no es conocida con ese nombre. Informadores locales de Xodos y de Vistabella no la nombran así. Hemos detectado siete sendas que has etiquetado de manera similar a esta ("sendero zampones, senda zampones, senderos zampones, senda de los zampones").

Hace unos meses hablamos de mantener algunos topónimos utilizando las múltiples etiquetas que existen: official_name, loc_name, alt_name, mtb:name o name. En este caso, parece una toponimia usada exclusivamente por un grupo reducido de personas (¿un club tal vez?). Además, tampoco sigue el criterio seguido en OpenStreetMap de etiquetar en valenciano los topónimos de las zonas de predominio lingüístico valenciano.
El resto de ediciones que realizas son buenas y muy positivas. Pero en este caso, creo que deberíamos corregirlo.
Un saludo cordial,
Jordi
paunofu (2021-11-11 21:43:04+00:00): Buenas noches Jose, 
Concuerdo con Jordi, deberíamos usar la etiqueta name para nombres oficiales y las otras etiquetas para nombres alternativos o conocidos por grupos especificos
Jordi MF (2021-11-15 19:49:36+00:00): Al no recibir respuesta, procedo a eliminar los nombres considerados inventados.
limes11 (2021-11-29 04:47:43+00:00): Hi,

Willkommen zu osm. Das lief hier etwas schief. Falls die Straße wieder befahrbar ist, dann müssen die ganzen "construction =..." Tags an den Wegen weg. Die verhindern jegliches Routing. Zudem war dies vor den Bauarbeiten ein highway=secondary und ist jetzt highway=unclassified. Eine bewusste Entscheidung oder ein Fehler?

Beste Grüße, Limes
Violaine_Do (2022-12-04 09:08:04+00:00): added a phone:mobile tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113439072
Tilia_J (2021-11-06 13:24:22+00:00): Ik vind die man_made embankments veel te prominent voor een bomkrater.

Bovendien is dit "taggen voor de renderer" oftewel een kaartelement gebruiken waar die niet voor bedoeld is, met als enkel doel iets zichtbaar te krijgen.

Ik zou dus gewoon die historic=bomb_crater behouden

Soms duurt het even voordat een kaartelement in de weergave wordt opgenomen. Het is niet anders.
eggie (2021-11-06 21:17:10+00:00): Talud verwijderd..
Je bomkrater staat overigens wel in de data van OSM
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-06 21:21:06+00:00): Talud verwijderd...
Zou verder niet weten hoe je zoiets zichtbaar zou moeten maken.

Up to you verder.
Je zou eens advies aan medemappers het forum kunnen vragen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Inlog identiek aan osm account.

MVG
eggie
mdavids (2021-11-08 17:39:21+00:00): Maar eens afwachten wat er gebeurt. In elk geval heel erg bedankt dat je hebt willen meedenken! Tilia_J suggereert dat ze misschien toch ooit nog gaan verschijnen. Dat zou mooi zijn.
eggie (2021-11-08 18:10:54+00:00): Wie weet... maar dan 'moet' die tag wel heel veel gebruikt worden wereldwijd.
Mapse.
Eggie
*Martin* (2022-10-06 13:31:23+00:00): Ahoj Klerik7. Do tagu name sa dava vlastne meno objektu, nie vseobecne. Nazov "Hasičská stanica" na vseobecne meno, ktore tam nepatri. To, ze je to hasicska stanica je uz vyjadrene tagom amenity=fire_station.
Patr1k_P (2022-10-06 13:38:35+00:00): ahoj, no nechcem sa hadat ale tento pripad nie je tak uplne pravda..Hasicska stanica byva bezne umiestnena aj tabula, takze je to aj nazov objektu...to iste by sa dalo povedat napr. o obecnom urade, materskej alebo zakladnej skole, ktore tiez pomenuvavame a tabula s nazvom sa nachadza na budove
*Martin* (2022-10-06 13:43:41+00:00): Ano, na tabule je aj vseobecne meno ale to neznamena, ze patri do tagu name. Potom ho je nutne prekladat do vsetkych jazykov. Typ skoly, ze je zakladna, sa vyjadruje tagom isced:level. "Obecny urad" tiez do tagu name nepatri, mozno tak nazov obce ktory ten urad prebera.
*Martin* (2022-10-06 13:49:54+00:00): Inac napr. aj na autobusovych zastavkach je bezne napisane "zastavka" a do name sa to nedava. Alebo na zmenarnach "Zmenaren", na policajnej stanici "Policia" a pod.
Patr1k_P (2022-10-06 14:00:20+00:00): ci patri alebo nepatri je diskutabilne...zastavka je nieco ine, to neni tabula na budove..Policajnu stanicu tiez niekto znaci..Je to skratka nazov objektu oznaceny tabulou, mne to pride ok..

myslim ze horsie je to s nazvami ako napr. toto

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9671013644

..alebo bezne su pomenovane pramene ako pramen ci studnicka a podobne...stale po niekom opravujem
*Martin* (2022-10-06 14:10:59+00:00): Neviem o pravidle, ze tabule na budove sa rataju a na zastavke nie. Pravidla maju byt jednoznacne, nie fuzzy. Pravidlo, ze "vseobecne podstatne meno" do tagu "name" nepatri je jasne a netreba k nemu nejake podpravidla a tabulky, ze kde este ano a kde uz nie. Tiez nie je vyznam mat v nazve vseobecne meno. Ked vidim v mape ikonu policie, alebo obecneho uradu, tak ten text tam zavadzia. Vseobecne nazvy patria do mapovej legendy a nie priamo do mapy.

Tiez, skus napr. ist na https://www.freemap.sk/#map=19/48.711905/20.972250&layers=VO - co je vektorova mapa podporujuca rozne jazyky, a prepni si to do anglictiny. A taky anglican netusi co je "hasicska stanica", no nastastie tam ma ikonu a moze iba mylne predpokladat, ze ta hasicska stanica sa vola "Hasicska stanica" (I was at fire station Hasicka stanica).

Ak chces, mozeme to osobne prebrat na stretnuti OZ Freemap o mesiac vo Filakove. Alebo si mozeme dat nejake kosicke stretko.
*Martin* (2022-10-06 14:17:26+00:00): este k pramenom - robis spravne, ze tam nedavas/mazes text "pramen", iba ak by sa ten pramen naozaj volal "Pramen", tj. pramen Pramen. Podobne plani, ak na prameni najdes tabulku "pramen Anna", tak do name das iba "Anna". A toto ma platit vsade, nie len pri pramenoch, ale aj pre institucie.
Patr1k_P (2022-10-06 14:38:53+00:00): tabula na budove znaci nazov objektu, ci nazov budovy? alebo institucie v nej? Skratka tabula tam je...v tychto pripadoch si myslim ze nazov nevadi...ako som uz pisal je to diskutabilne, ty hovoris tak niekto iny hovori inak...ked to zoberiem, tak vsetko je vyjadrene nejakou znackou, takze nazvy teda nemusia byt nikde...a ja s tym nemam problem ich tam nedavat, horsie je to s tymi dalsimi co sa sa registruju alebo robia obcasne upravy a nemaju paru o tom...mozes zalozit vlakno na fore o tomto probleme a aspon budem kazdeho odkazovat na to vlakno a nemusim sa s niektorymi dohadovat, alebo si mozem ulahcit robotu a prestanem takychto ludi sledovat a nech si kazdy znaci ako chce a nebudem opravovat stale po niekom
*Martin* (2022-10-06 14:45:45+00:00): > ked to zoberiem, tak vsetko je vyjadrene nejakou znackou, takze nazvy teda nemusia byt nikde

Akou inou znackou ako "name" vyjadris, ze pramen sa vola "Anna"?

A k tym vseobecnym nazvom v name - to nie je moj vymysel. Je to spomenute aj na wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names

Ja tie vseobecne nazvy teda mazem, ak na ne pri mapovani narazim a obcas na to aj upozornim aj mappera, ako to bolo v tomto pripade :-)
BCNorwich (2021-11-06 16:40:19+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You've introduced a self intersection of the highway on Farifield Road. Also there are three sections of Victoria street and one section of Manor Road that are not tagged as oneway, but are between the sections of highway you've tagged as oneway. It just doesn't look right.

If you need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
km2bp (2021-11-06 13:14:50+00:00): Będzie co robić w terenie.  I tu kolejne obiekty https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.40991/15.50626
canfe (2021-11-07 17:50:20+00:00): Ma è corretto il layer -1 del museo?
Gigillo83 (2021-11-11 21:43:26+00:00): Il centro di documentazione è adiacente al museo del ricamo ed arte tessile lanzese,
Il quale ha una forma un po’ particolare perché dotato di terrazzo all’aperto (in curva).
canfe (2021-11-14 15:48:38+00:00): Capito!
Grazie.
Guarda se può migliorarne la geometria che OSMOSE segnala che la strada interseca l'edificio.
Tu sicuramente ne conosci bene le geometrie.
tonyf1 (2021-11-06 19:31:38+00:00): Hi, have a look at the wiki. There is ambiguity about gravel, you are probably better with compacted,
HighRouleur (2021-11-06 21:04:00+00:00): Hi, thanks for the feedback. 
I saw that the majority of the roads in this park had already been tagged as gravel, so just using consistency to tag the road surface of those that had not been defined.
tonyf1 (2021-11-06 22:26:43+00:00): Yes, consistency is often a good guide but gravel is a value best avoided. There was quite a lot of discussion a while back  on talk-au. The inconsistency may stem from the widespread use of river gravels in Europe. If you are not familiar with tags and values, its worth checking on the wiki, sometimes the meaning in English is not quite the same.
wombatmaper (2024-08-03 16:42:26+00:00): Hej, I cycled this route today and it defiantly did not seem to be a cycle path, as it passed through private property and was not very hard to cycle on. I could also not see any signs. 
I was unable to find any other sources though, do you know if the diversion is still correct?
Fritz Kolbe (2024-08-04 07:23:20+00:00): Hej Sorry it seems to be a missunderstanding there is no pas through or around this property any more. alternativ route were a mere suggestion.
Lee Carré (2021-11-06 21:46:37+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
iWowik (2021-12-06 05:40:25+00:00): Yes, perhaps the wiki article needs improvement
SomeoneElse (2023-11-02 20:40:57+00:00): Hello iWowik,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.  We've received a couple of complaints about some of your changes.  One example is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760469289/history .  What exactly was the source of your change there?  You added "ulica Oświecenia" and "Просвещения улица" - it has been suggested that those are just translations rather than names, and therefore don't actually belong in OSM at all.
Note that the spelling of the Russian and Polish wiki pages for the organisation that this street is named after is different to yours: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0 and https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proswita .
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2023-11-02 20:42:31+00:00): Привет, iWowik!
Здесь Энди из рабочей группы по данным OSM. Мы получили несколько жалоб на некоторые ваши изменения. Одним из примеров является https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760469289/history. Что именно было источником ваших изменений? Вы добавили «улица Освенения» и «Просвещения улица» — было высказано предположение, что это всего лишь переводы, а не имена, и поэтому они вообще не относятся к OSM.
Обратите внимание, что написание русской и польской вики-страниц организации, в честь которой названа эта улица, отличается от вашего: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE% D1%81%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B0 и https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proswita .
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Энди
SomeoneElse (2023-11-09 10:59:44+00:00): I've changed Просвіти вулиця in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143817038 , but I suspect that other changes might be needed here too.
SomeoneElse (2023-11-09 11:00:27+00:00): Я изменил Просвіти улица в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143817038, но подозреваю, что и здесь могут потребоваться другие изменения.
SomeoneElse (2023-11-09 11:00:42+00:00): Я змінив Просвіти вулиця в https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143817038 , але підозрюю, що тут також можуть знадобитися інші зміни.
jeslop (2022-02-05 19:24:59+00:00): Hola sergiommd041. Bienvenido a OSM.

Has duplicado nodos de iglesias que ya existían en el mapa. Los he eliminado.

Un saludo

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
richlv (2021-11-08 15:11:13+00:00): Hi, this changeset changes tags on highway areas - for example, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/538568103/history .
Has this been discussed in the local community mailing list?
richlv (2021-11-08 15:15:05+00:00): Another example - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/921051459/history . That area is not marked as parking, thus the functional change might be incorrect.
There might be other suspect changhes like that - so this would require discussion in the talk-lv mailing list.
Tramparam Parampampam (2021-11-08 18:36:23+00:00): hello. no, it is not discussed, i just freefixed everything around. if you think that this is wrong you are free to change as you wish. just don't roll back changeset please.
richlv (2021-11-14 15:52:54+00:00): Thank you for the reply, greatly appreciated.
How do you find things that need fixing, and how do you decide how to fix them?
In some cases, highway=service + area=yes have been replaced with area:highway=yes, losing information about way classification - and this seems to go against the tag documentation in the wiki.
Could you please discuss these changes in the talk-lv mailing list?
If considered acceptable, they would likely require setting proper way classification.
Tramparam Parampampam (2021-11-14 17:27:34+00:00): i use ID editor, this is fixes offered by it.
Tramparam Parampampam (2021-11-14 17:29:47+00:00): btw - you could always find me in https://discord.gg/openstreetmap
my name there is wad#4687
Cartographer10 (2021-11-06 17:41:37+00:00): Hallo,

Als eerste welkom op OSM. In NL worden bedrijven doorgaans op de adresnode getagd. Ik heb de info dus van het pand naar het adrespunt verhuisd (verschilt per land dus kon je niet weten). https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2815731774

Mvg,
Vincent
ottwiz (2021-11-06 12:49:32+00:00): + I splitted up a very long forest landcover which went across the border of Bulgaria, so if you see why is this so big, this is the reason. the original way contained 1797(!) nodes, so that's why i decided to split the CLC landcover up.
mosstreet (2021-11-07 10:04:01+00:00): на снимке же видно  803270531
xrew (2021-11-08 16:49:11+00:00): Здравствуйте, погорячился, верну.
Cyber Alert Red (2021-11-07 21:44:47+00:00): Is it correct to tag the sidewalks as footways?
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2021-11-08 05:21:02+00:00): Yes, it has been that way for a decade.
Cyber Alert Red (2021-11-08 09:37:10+00:00): Do you mind if I explicitly tag them as sidewalks?
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2021-11-08 12:53:22+00:00): If you want to yeah, the tag for that is footway=sidewalk in addition to existing highway=footway. It should also be a preset in the iD editor.
mariotomo (2021-11-06 15:05:47+00:00): hi, thanks, do you want to do more in the wider area? what is it that you enjoy mapping most?
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 17:56:51+00:00): Hello , yes of course , buildings is my favourite mapping attributes
mariotomo (2021-11-06 18:29:00+00:00): then something that would be of very high impact (in my opinion) is to follow rivers (mapped or unmapped) and add buildings (isolated or grouped).  if you see a group of buildings you can add a place=hamlet, from 30-40 buildings it would probably be a village. adding landuse=residential is less relevant IMO. blue roofs are generally schools, but not always.
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:36:39+00:00): Thank you so much , I really appreciate your support helping me making an impact through mapping. 🌏
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:33:17+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:33:09+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:33:01+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:32:55+00:00): Added buildings
JuanjoMC (2021-11-06 18:13:41+00:00): Hi again,

FYI, there is a sticker on the door of this building stating that this business, Schiesser, is definitely closed.
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:32:48+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:32:35+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:32:27+00:00): Added buildings
JuanjoMC (2021-11-06 18:09:29+00:00): Hi,

Have you surveyed this area recently?

I ask because the building that you mapped here has been destroyed by fire last June, see here (in french): https://www.dhnet.be/regions/bruxelles/incendie-en-cours-dans-un-hangar-a-strombeek-bever-le-plan-catastrophe-active-60ba432b9978e20c6024c11e
Tom Ameye (2021-11-06 19:08:44+00:00): You are most probably correct. Thanks for noticing. I will survey the area in the near future.
muralito (2021-11-06 18:34:02+00:00): Hola. ¿La terminal linea 80 es para pasajeros?
El amenity=bus_station es para eso, para servicio a pasajeros. Para el deposito o talleres de las empresas es otro el etiquetado.
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:32:20+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:32:10+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:32:02+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:31:55+00:00): Added buildings
BCNorwich (2021-11-12 19:08:46+00:00): Hi, It seems that you've drawn your new service highways (cart paths) to zig-zag over existing highways making for duplication. Please see the list of warnings above to realise the extent of the problem.

If a highway, or any feature, needs amending or correcting it is OSM practice to amend/correct the existing feature. Please don't delete and redraw or draw over existing features.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:31:49+00:00): Added buildings
eggie (2021-11-06 21:32:18+00:00): Hi Erick..
No building here.
BING is outdated. Please use a more actual background from PDOK.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-11-06 21:38:43+00:00): Perhaps you are right .. difficult to see https://www.satellietdataportaal.nl/?base=openstreetmap&res=0.5&datemin=06-11-2020&loc=52.06445%2C5.256464%2C18z&overlay=mos-0&marker=loc&acqdate=2021-09-07&acqid=20210907_113738_SV1-02&sensor=SuperView-1

Greetz,
eggie
Erick tamba (2021-11-07 05:30:38+00:00): Well noted 
Thank you
ilikerice (2021-11-06 14:32:46+00:00): if you revert this, I will come after you with a butter knife, ok
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:31:42+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:31:35+00:00): Added buildings
MxxCon (2021-11-06 15:37:58+00:00): Hello.
Please note that "is_in:" tag is deprecated and shouldn't be added to any features. OSM database no longer needs it to figure out where something is in relation to something else.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113448734
Otenkiya (2021-11-14 13:34:03+00:00): 報告：
ウェイ: 第二京浜 (999940088) を新設した際に、リレーション: 国道1号 (32989) に断絶が発生。修復済み。
NovaScotiaMappie (2021-12-14 18:31:49+00:00): Olá Vítor Dias,

Percebi que você adicionou muitas tags de referência JFA e relações às rodovias ao redor de Juiz de Fora. A fonte que você citou para isso é “Prefeitura de Juiz de Fora”, fiz algumas pesquisas, mas não consegui encontrar um recurso que mostre esses refs, essa fonte está postada em algum lugar? Pelo que pude constatar, parece que os JFA são árbitros municipais de Juiz de Fora, então gostaria de saber se você concorda que modelar estes como ‘loc_ref’ pode ser mais preciso do que ‘ref’ (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref) uma vez que não são referências nacionais. Estou curioso para ouvir sua opinião!

Obrigado,
NovaScotiaMappie
Vítor Dias (2021-12-14 18:43:11+00:00): Boa tarde! Usei dois mapas como fonte: este https://www.pjf.mg.gov.br/leis_urbanas/arquivos/segunda_edicao/anexo_2.pdf e um mapa vetorizado de vias de Juiz de Fora que encontrei, mas não me lembro o endereço certo. Acho que foi na área do plano diretor de JF. Os sistemas rodoviários municipais de Minas Gerais são elaborados pelos municípios e aprovados pelo DER-MG, então penso que esses códigos de estradas, por serem aprovados a nível estadual, são referendados o suficiente para constar da etiqueta "ref", ao invés de "loc_ref".
NovaScotiaMappie (2021-12-15 22:35:58+00:00): Olá Vítor Dias,

Obrigado por entrar em contato comigo tão rapidamente e por fornecer esse recurso detalhado! Achei que ‘loc_ref’ poderia ser apropriado com base na documentação OSM Wiki e outras situações semelhantes no Brasil, mas entendo que estão bem estabelecidas e funcionam como ‘ref’ também.

Obrigada!
NovaScotiaMappie
Vítor Dias (2021-12-15 23:26:46+00:00): Olá, NovaScotiaMappie! Infelizmente códigos de rodovias municipais costumam ser muito pouco divulgados por se tratarem, em quase 100% dos casos, de estradas rurais, atendendo a uma quantidade menor de pessoas. Mas em muitos casos eles existem, costumam ter regulamentação e aprovação dos órgãos estaduais e deveriam ser melhor divulgados. Abraços!
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:31:27+00:00): Added buildings
Marek-M (2021-11-06 19:48:35+00:00): Hej, chyba strzeliłeś literówkę :) Zamiast cycleway=line powinno być cycleway=lane
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113449287
kornad (2021-11-07 07:56:51+00:00): Faktycznie, dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi :)
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:31:17+00:00): Added buildings
eggie (2021-11-07 13:24:43+00:00): Dag Wim.. Je vraagt feedback.. Wanneer een pad nog niet gereed is kun je die het beste intekenen met highway=construction 
construction=footway
name=...
Een combinatie foot-yes access=no beter niet doen.
foot=yes is default .. access=no geeft allemaal problemen.
Kijk je nog even?
MVG
eggie
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:31:04+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:30:57+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:30:49+00:00): Added buildings
4004 (2021-11-22 01:14:30+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
что же вы замапили с таким детальным комментарием к правке?
4004 (2021-11-22 01:15:49+00:00): если можно, в следющий раз делите пакеты правок по городам хоть
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:30:41+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:30:32+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:30:21+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:29:53+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:29:46+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:29:40+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:29:31+00:00): Added buildings
mueschel (2022-06-05 10:42:52+00:00): Hi,
I found the tag 'ped = pole' here - it looks like a spelling mistake, could you check that?
Jorisbo (2022-06-05 17:49:19+00:00): Hello Mueschel ! I really don't know what ped=pole could mean. It has been added by the first creator 5 years ago: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/IanH  
Kind regards , Joris
wonderb0lt (2021-11-06 15:29:02+00:00): additional source: mapilliary
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:29:24+00:00): Added buildings
Enock4seth (2021-12-10 12:28:24+00:00): Hi  Erick, this discussion is not for repeating changeset comment which is entered before uploading your changes. You might want to take a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Erick tamba (2021-12-10 13:46:05+00:00): Thanks !
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:29:01+00:00): Added buildings
Erick tamba (2021-11-06 18:28:49+00:00): Added buildings
eggie (2021-11-07 13:26:57+00:00): Tja.. Je hebt het pad al weer verwijderd.
Wanneer er nog niets te zien is kun je ook
highway=proposed
proposed=footway
note=position is estimated oid
Het rendert dan niet op de kaart, maar staat dan wel vast in de data.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-07 21:39:54+00:00): Ahh.. het pad is er nog. Ik heb access=no verwijderd
gr eggie