piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Christopher (2015-04-08 17:16:09+00:00): Genau, separate Spuren wurden früher erfasst, heute wird das mit hilfe von turn:* - tags gelöst.
Als Hinweis für die Erfassung von Fahrspuren sei die Wochenaufgabe aus dem Blog ein guter Anlaufpunkt. Einfach mal das PDF durcharbeiten: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2014/11/wochenaufgabe-kw4748-fahrspuren-mit-richtungsangabe-erfassen/
Dort ist auch ein tolles Negativbeispiel hinterlegt, warum man diese nicht separat als highway erfässt.
da-sch (2015-04-08 20:37:27+00:00): Problem erkannt, dank. Korrigiere es wieder.
Baloo Uriza (2015-04-07 01:09:06+00:00): Is this a RV park or a trailer park or is it both?
dpppppppp (2015-04-18 03:09:24+00:00): Both!
maraf24 (2015-04-02 21:15:25+00:00): A właściwie to dlaczego? Raz, że to jest dozwolone. Dwa, że to rysowanie chodników to ulubione zajęcie początkujących. Za jakiś czas dorysują znowu.
emes (2015-04-02 21:40:29+00:00): Jak najbardziej jest dozwolone, ale wychodzę z przekonania, że z dwóch poprawnych sposobów zapisu lepszy jest ten o mniejszej objętości danych. Sens nanoszenia chodników osobno widzę gdy oddzielone są od jezdni parkingiem lub szpalerem zieleni; wtedy stają się w pewnym sensie osobnym ciągiem komunikacyjnym.
maraf24 (2015-04-03 07:36:00+00:00): A chodnik z bicycle=yes też się da tak zintergrować?
emes (2015-04-03 15:22:56+00:00): sidewalk:bicycle=yes wydaje się być właściwym podejściem, choć oficjalnie nie jest udokumentowane. Sprawa się trochę komplikuje. Warto spojrzeć na przykłady S3 i S4 na poniższej stronie.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle
muralito (2016-11-30 19:46:06+00:00): Hola. Hay una nota de un usuario https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/800729 diciendo que esta calle que renombraste de "Misiones Orientales" a "Piedras" se llama "Misiones". 

¿Podes revisar tu fuente?
muralito (2016-11-30 19:48:49+00:00): Y la de "15 de Noviembre" me quedan dudas.
neluy1611 (2016-12-07 01:46:43+00:00): Hola, de donde saqué esos datos es de los mapas del INE 2004/2011 tal como puse en el comentario en aquel momento. Ahora comparando con el mapa del Mides (mapas.mides.gub.uy) veo que Misiones es tal como dices, y 15 de Noviembre figura como Luis Alberto de Herrera (desde Bolivia hasta Uruguay), Misiones es la continuación de L.A.de Herrera desde Uruguay hasta el Arroyo Ceibal, y luego de éste ahí si se llama Piedras hasta terminar en Manuel Patule
neluy1611 (2016-12-07 01:51:11+00:00): El mapa del Mides últimamente creo a mi entender es el dato mas fiable y cercano a la realidad, lo dejo en tus manos o sino me decís y arreglo lo de estas calles en esta discusión. Si te fijas en el mapa del Mides verás que está la opción "Calles y caminería" en el panel de la derecha, ahí están los datos que te pasé ahora en mi comentario anterior, saludos
muralito (2016-12-07 12:28:34+00:00): Le voy a preguntar a https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Pablo%20Lorda%20Da%20Costa%20Porto que ha estado mapeando Salto en las ultimas semanas...
Pablo Lorda Da Costa Porto (2016-12-08 18:41:29+00:00): Calle Misiones y Luis Alberto de Herrera son la misma. Tomando el sentido de la calle que corre el arroyo ceibal hasta Uruguay es Misiones. Despues de Calle Uruguay es Luis Alberto de Herrera.
Misiones y Piedras son calles diferentes. Paralelas entre si, pero separadas por calle Cerrito
muralito (2016-12-09 18:08:18+00:00): Gracias Pablo por la confirmacion. Quedaron corregidas.
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-05-16 06:19:08+00:00): Hi, primary_link and secondary_links are supposed to be for slip roads instead of the main carriageway.
dudka (2015-03-31 12:52:30+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:service%3Dalley
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-18 19:49:21+00:00): The maxheight tag on the Broadway bridge is specified as: 16'12"
Is there a reason this is not just?: 17'
JOSM was throwing a warning and then I realized that there are 12 inches in a foot.
Grant Humphries (2015-09-18 22:25:27+00:00): I don't recall adding this tag, for some reason the history only goes back as far one of my edits, but I wasn't the creator of the feature that represents the Broadway bridge.  FWIW, I can't think of any good reason for the height to be in that format so I'd say change it.
Peter Dobratz (2015-09-19 02:53:22+00:00): I think the number is actually wrong.  I think roads are assumed to have at least 16 or 17 feet of clearance unless otherwise signed.  I'll make a note to double check for signs sometime.
Peter Dobratz (2016-05-03 21:38:15+00:00): I've updated it to be 12'6" (12 feet 6 inches).  The original data as entered as 16"12', which was subsequently corrected to 16'12"
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-04-11 05:17:26+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/335200143/history has waterway = brook that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you meant by waterway=brook? Is not using https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream intentional and wanted here? How waterway=brook differs from waterway=stream in this case?
MelioraCogito (2024-04-12 23:26:04+00:00): A brook, is a small stream.

I was [likely¹] trying to distinguish the difference between the continuous flowing waterway (down-stream) and the intermittent nature of the smaller waterway above the dammed pond, into which this "brook" feeds.

I don't know if OSM has changed its standards since, but a decade ago, contributors could add user-defined tags to object/way keys so long as they conformed to the general standard of the day:  "waterway=brook" though not formally defined in the OSM Wiki, is (was?) an acceptable tag to the key "waterway" as it conveyed a descriptive state of the feature.

At this point, for all I know (or can remember), "brook" might have been an actually defined tag for the key "waterway" but was subsequently discarded, as causing confusing—I simply don't know or remember.

I stopped editing OSM a long time ago (more than 6–7 years ago) because of obsessive compulsive little map Nazi's reverting my edits because they thought my edits didn't strictly adhere to THEIR interpretation of the OSM Wiki standards, which clearly allows for some flexibility, not an enforced absolutist rigidity.
—
¹  Anthropocentric deity myths only know what I was thinking a decade ago—why you think I should know in 2024, what I was doing in an edit in 2014/15 is beyond me.
pangoSE (2018-08-09 19:47:05+00:00): Vilken typ av amenity är det? Se https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:amenity
pangoSE (2018-08-11 09:37:58+00:00): *det=Stratsys
archie (2018-08-11 13:02:43+00:00): Där finns ingen amenity. Har kollat på platsen för 1,5 timmar sedan. Oseriös mappning som så ofta. Bra att du gör en koll på denna tag! Raderat och lagt till parkeringsautomaten på motsatta sidan.
wo0GSWr6MfJgFj (2018-08-11 19:32:48+00:00): Enligt deras hemsida har de kontor med adress Packhusplatsen 2. (https://www3.stratsys.se/sv/Om-stratsys/Om-oss/) Kanske bättre att flytta noden dit?
archie (2018-08-11 20:04:54+00:00): Packhusplatsen! Det här är hörnan Kronhus-/Smedjegatan. Sedan är ett företag knappast en amenity. Jag har kollat namnskyltarna vid husentrén. Ingen Stratsys, endast privatpersoner. Kolla själv! Har du tid med såna här diskussioner? Inte jag. Jag väntar med intresse på nästa tokargument.
archie (2018-08-11 20:08:08+00:00): Verifiera att de finns på den på hemsidan uppgivna adressen och gör vad du vill. Skall bli intressant vilken amenity du väljer. För det var ju den ursprungliga frågan, inte sant.
pangoSE (2018-08-14 13:02:49+00:00): Ok, archie. Jag håller på kolla upp alla deprecated_tags i SE via taginfo->overpass turbo. Det är ganska kul :)
archie (2018-08-14 17:28:34+00:00): Bra initiativ!
HostedDinner (2015-04-01 17:59:49+00:00): Ich werde mal schauen, nach Ostern habe ich wieder Zeit, dann werde ich die Busrouten ergänzen :)
NAGAR PANCHAYAT RAJESULTANPUR (2015-03-31 07:58:32+00:00): NH 233A
surveyor54 (2015-03-31 17:09:28+00:00): Bitte die Hausnummer nicht als Namen taggen.
Es sollte mindestens die Straße noch mit angegeben werden. 
Hier ein Beispiel:
addr:street=Raiffeisenstraße
addr:housenumber=13

Gruß
surveyor54
flohoff (2015-03-31 12:27:55+00:00): Hi,
leider fehlt hier ein Changeset Kommentar so das nicht so einfach nachvollziehbar ist was du geändert hast oder warum.

Flo
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-15 08:51:14+00:00): Kolego, ciągle rysujesz do nieskalibrowanego binga, poza tym psujesz adresację. Chcesz rysować obrysy - rysuj, ale istniejącej adresacji nie tykaj, bo tylko generujesz wybrakowane adresy.
OpenStreetMap-WP (2015-04-15 09:54:08+00:00): Adresacja jak to piszesz jest dobra.Pozdrawiam
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-04-15 10:00:38+00:00): Tak, masz rację - dobry to on jest teraz, bo poprawiłem: http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=335714917
Proszę sobie poczytać: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
woodpeck (2015-03-31 12:36:25+00:00): Löschomat, Deine "Putzaktionen" stören den Frieden in OSM (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=30613). Zwar sind Sammelrelationen in OSM tatsächlich nicht sinnvoll, aber in dieser großflächigen und aggressiven Weise sollte man nicht gegen sie vorgehen. Nimm Dir ein Beispiel an https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/29639454 - das ist eine besser Community-verträgliche Löschung. Wenn Du dazu keine Zeit hast, dann spar Dir die Löschung insgesamt und warte, bis jemand die Zeit hat, es richtig zu machen und ohne dabei Leute zu verärgern.
Jojo4u (2015-04-01 12:18:02+00:00): löschomat löscht fröhlich weiter, 7 Changesets heute.
Löschomat (2015-04-02 07:29:29+00:00): Mir is bisher kein einziges inhaltlich zutreffendes Argument der ganzen Diskussion im Forum ersichtlich. Es handelt sich hier ausschliesslich um eine Aktion gegen einen bekannten Ignoranten von lang diskutierten und vereinbarten Regeln. Der Fall hat sich jetzt erledigt und Dank der schönen WIKI des users war es für mich leicht möglich alles zu entfernen. Für mich ist der Fall erledigt Ich appeliere an euren Sachverstand das nicht mehr zu revertieren. Sorry für die Socke aber manche Dinge gehen leider nicht anders.
woodpeck (2015-04-02 07:59:43+00:00): Leider ist nicht der Inhalt Deiner Löschungen das Problem, sondern die Form, die Du mit "Sorry... gehen leider nicht anders" nicht entschuldigen kannst.
ika-chan! UK-USA (2015-03-31 13:29:58+00:00): The road in red is pretty much an old national road of orange, due to the bypass (in Green). That should be PEO2/PEO3 now. Please take new roads built after the 1963 list into account.
JayCBR (2015-04-01 08:05:03+00:00): the green road is replacing EO3 going vertical, EO2 should continue its course horizontally through Florina
flohoff (2015-03-31 12:28:38+00:00): Hi,
leider hast du bei den letzten 5 changesets nie einen Changeset Kommentar für die änderungen eingegeben. Damit ist es schwer nachzuvollziehen was und warum du etwas gemacht hast.

Flo
uname (2015-03-31 12:50:47+00:00): глюкнуло - прошу прощения - посмотрел на статистику решил переделать из sevice на кладбищах и в садовоогородных кооперативах, ну и видимо изза массовости переделки допустил ошибочку
dudka (2015-03-31 11:27:52+00:00): эта улица точно одностороння  http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142378058 ?
dudka (2015-03-31 11:28:03+00:00): поправьте название http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/142378045
dudka (2015-03-31 11:28:28+00:00): пишите слово "улица" без сокращений
SK53 (2015-03-31 10:54:57+00:00): 

Welcome & thanks for editing OpenStreetMap. Unfortunately I don't think these individual paths are named "The Big Track" because they could equally be called "Trent Valley Way" (which also runs along these paths). Because of this we have a mechanism for naming routes which follow a path. This uses a relation of type=route. The Big Track has been mapped this way for quite a while: see http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1387699. When the The Big Track followed Lenton Lane, the name was that of the street. The regular Standard rendering does not show this information, but if you click on the Cycle Map layer you can see the track clearly labelled. 

Adding descriptive names (such as "footpath") is unnecessary, all such information is included in the tags and can be added if desired by data consumers. They do not belong in the main database. It's worth having a read of the Good Practices page on the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things.

SK53

PS. You have mis-spelt Towpath in later edits.
deleted_account (2015-03-31 22:15:56+00:00): zabrakło addr:street
Derick Rethans (2015-03-31 10:56:07+00:00): Hey - the Blue Anchor was already mapped:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/286509350

Your addition makes it a duplicate.

It would be awesome if you could also tag the address, and whether they serve real ale (real_ale=yes) tag.
BSRE (2015-03-31 10:57:37+00:00): Thank you, just seen that The Blue Anchor is now a duplicate. I will delete it and find out if either serve real ales. Thank you for your feedback
Derick Rethans (2015-03-31 11:00:43+00:00): And thank you for adding things to OpenStreetMap! Plenty of things to do in London - it gets addictive ;-)
BSRE (2015-03-31 11:04:12+00:00): Thanks Derick - I can't seem to find the real ale tag... any advice?
Derick Rethans (2015-03-31 11:06:52+00:00): I don't think iD shows all tags - you can on the left hand side open up "All tags (3)" and then use the + to add a new tag yourself. 

OpenStreetMap basically allows you to tag objects with whatever you want - not only with what the editor tells you is okay.
BSRE (2015-03-31 11:09:41+00:00): Understood - I can see things are going to get quite busy for me! Thank you again for your help
Christian Janiesch (2015-03-31 11:03:45+00:00): Trail was missing so far
SomeoneElse (2015-04-01 17:04:25+00:00): Is Goose Lane http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124368378 really private with no other access rights?  It seems odd that there is a public footpath http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124368397 running north from it.
gryphon (2015-03-31 17:44:46+00:00): Скажите, пожалуйста, для чего вы массово меняете government -> administrative и почему вы считаете, что, скажем, Росреестр относится именно к administrative?
Отпишитесь, пожалуйста, на форуме http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=494517#p494517
4rch (2015-03-31 15:04:30+00:00): Hello, you've damaged the following administrative boundaries due to your edits:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4538945
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4538705
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4538941
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4538585

Best regards, 4rch
will_p (2015-03-31 11:54:22+00:00): Hi,

A couple of thoughts about this change:

1. Is 'Derbyshire Land Registry' a suitable source for making changes to OSM? Note that you must only use sources that are compatible with OSM's ODBL licence. This means most copyrighted sources cannot be used. 

2. We map what physically exists on the ground, which might not correspond with what official sources claim. When I mapped that area, Castle Drive did physically join up with Castle Lane. The only legitimate reason for separating them would be if you have verified on the ground that a fence or other barrier has appeared that completely blocks access. Castle Drive is already tagged as being private.

Regards,
Will
Alidmun (2015-04-01 02:28:02+00:00): The Derbyshire Land registry is accessible to anyone in the uk. There is physical barrier there now and is inaccessible.  A picture of the barrier can be found published on cyclestreets.net
SomeoneElse (2015-04-01 15:58:04+00:00): Just to clarify something - if there's no public access along a track but the track physically exists you don't need to "unjoin" the track - just make sure that the access rights on it are correct.  There's already an open note http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/152813 suggesting that footpaths and rights of way here need further work, and also footpaths like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236871485 that need joining.  It definitely needs surveying on the ground - even if it was licence-compatible, I wouldn't trust any official record to be up to date.
SK53 (2015-04-01 17:55:26+00:00): Accessibility is not the same as permissible to use as a source for OpenStreetMap. Both Ordnance Survey mapping and Google Satellite images are fully accessible to anyone, but in neither case are these sources suitable for OSM. I'm also not clear what you mean by the Derbyshire Land Registry: The Land Registry of England and Wales is the cadastral authority, but context suggests that you are referring to Derbyshire as the Highways Authority.

Lastly I'd like to check that it is Castle Drive which is shown with a gate in the picture & not Castle Lane.
will_p (2015-04-01 21:44:50+00:00): From memory I believe the CycleStreets photo does show the correct location. It was blocked in a similar way when I surveyed it, hence why I tagged it as private. 
The track does physically still exist, even if the gate is blocked by a lump of rock and corrugated iron, so I see no reason to disconnect it from Castle Lane completely.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-23 12:01:36+00:00): For info I was there last night; but the footpath west across the golf course (not along the old track) still needs mapping.  There are also a bunch of designations for public footpaths that need adding; I'll do that shortly.  Also there's actually some confusion as to how long one of the bridleways is (one end signed; the other not).
SomeoneElse (2015-05-23 12:05:46+00:00): For completeness see also http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/152813
KubasOSM (2015-03-31 11:59:55+00:00): dodanie numeru domu
ndm (2015-03-31 19:57:39+00:00): Does OSM have permission to use the official OS map?
UniofBath (2015-04-10 09:43:36+00:00): I think our usage is OK based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_Opendata.
ue0 (2018-08-31 18:45:19+00:00): я пол леса общарил, но "Могила солдата Красной Армии" так и ненашел)) она там точно есть?
Sergioni145 (2018-09-01 09:10:43+00:00): Ранее была точно. Сам видел. 
Вполне возможно уже следы её "подтёрты" местными "аматорами".
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-03-31 14:44:59+00:00): Jakaś dziura jest: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2660242#map=17/50.15446/20.16061
edward17 (2015-03-31 13:05:31+00:00): Пожалуйста, добавляйте хештег "#ТЗ_04" к комментарию пакета правок, чтобы он учитывался в статистике:
resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-changesets?comment=ТЗ_04
vt100 (2015-03-31 13:17:41+00:00): (Ja, Mehrzweckkarte Wien ist falsch, das war die JOSM-Vorbelegung) - Grund der Änderung war eine Fragestellung in #osm-de in Bezug auf OsmAnd (Hürtgenwald war nicht an-navigierbar als ort)
yrtimiD (2015-04-04 20:29:08+00:00): I'll change "Le'umi" to be "Leumi" as nobody spells it with apostrophe.
tunnelbauer (2015-03-31 14:03:40+00:00): Der 100er ist nicht ganz korrekt.
Stadtauswärts beginnt Glanegg gleich nach der Brücke ( http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/_J2Dz5VKyfzWZSE_I0yXMQ ) - somit auch der 50er - und stadteinwärts ca. auf Höhe der Lehrbauhofzufahrt (dem Teil der nach Osten führt http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/uWJ9CDlP_3KciSXDMpq_3g )
naoliv (2015-04-10 18:39:18+00:00): "Viaduto Padre Rodolfo Komorek" é o nome oficial e "Viaduto Kanebo" é como o viaduto é conhecido?
maraf24 (2015-04-02 19:40:28+00:00): A dlaczego bicycle=no? Regulamin zabrania jeźdzenia rowerem?
maraf24 (2015-04-02 19:45:53+00:00): Taka bramka nie połączona z niczym nie zadziała. Każda nawigacja przez to przejdzie.
By było dobrze wystarczy dać w węźle drogi barrier=gate, choć i można linię narysować, byle był punkt przecięcia się z drogą.
Nakaner (2015-09-30 21:55:10+00:00): Möchtest du dich mal des Taggings dieses Nodes annehmen? Es ist dein Node. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2026248168/history (missing country/operator prefix)
Nakaner (2015-09-30 21:55:42+00:00): Entschuldigung, das galt nicht dir. Ich habe den falschen Changeset kommentiert. rurseekatze ist der Adressat.
hadw (2017-05-04 09:25:08+00:00): Ditches are linear features that are impassible on foot.  Looking at the Bing imagery, it looks like what has been mapped here are area features, representing a depression.  ditch cannot be used on an area.

It's difficult to be sure, but it also looks like these are not impassable,
Derby45 (2017-05-04 11:09:37+00:00): Hi again,

I think I added these a long time ago to warn as more of a hazzard and could not find a relevant feature. If heading south, these are blind drops.

These are about 2 meters deep, and include drains. Very. very boggy in winter.
hadw (2017-05-04 11:25:44+00:00): These may be good questions for the forum, but, from your description, I think I would look into natural=cliff for the sheer drop but only for that part of the boundary where it applies, and some variation on wetland= for the area.

I'm a little surprised that a sheer drop of 2m would be allowed in a municipal park without fencing.

Ditch doesn't work, because it would mean that the cross-section, dropped for about a metre, or less, returned to the original level, and dropped again, for about a metre, on the other side.
mhenson (2015-03-31 20:50:32+00:00): Thank you for catching the fire hydrant in Stillwater, OK
base-t (2015-03-31 17:43:20+00:00): Einige Firmeneinträge aktualisiert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
Nakaner (2015-04-15 11:46:45+00:00): In Ostdeutschland gibt es keine Hp-Lichtsignale! Wenn dann sind das Hl-Signale, dann tagge die aber bitte richtig. Ich revertiere daher diesen Changeset.
mapper999 (2015-03-31 17:59:12+00:00): Hi,
das lf7-Signal bei Rheinsheim (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3428780913)war schon gemappt (ein paar Meter weiter südlich http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2148029012). Ich habe das damals von der Straße unter der Brücke entdeckt. Kann aber nicht mehr sagen, ob deine oder meine Position korrekt ist.
GerdP (2015-10-27 08:40:26+00:00): please review:

I've changed highway=pre-existing prior to redevelopment to highway=dismantled
Maybe map the area that is rebuilt
as landuse=construction ?
brianboru (2015-10-27 12:24:01+00:00): OK by me. I've also changed the spur at the end of the road in question
GerdP (2015-10-27 12:54:55+00:00): okay, thanks for the feedback
woodpeck (2018-01-24 14:05:10+00:00): Hallo, woher stammt der Name "Casa de Chela"? Bist Du selbst vor Ort gewesen und hast den dort erfasst, oder könnte der eventuell "aus Versehen" auch aus einer anderen Karte stammen?
Bratananio (2018-01-24 17:56:53+00:00): Ich bin seit 20 Jahren auf allen Inseln der Kapverden unterwegs und bekomme die Informationen sowohl von Freunden vor Ort als auch durch meine Eigenbesuche und Wanderungen.
Polyglot (2015-07-01 04:52:08+00:00): Von meiner Sicht sind die Haltestellen schon wieder verschwunden, wenn die Platforms nicht auf Nodes neben den Weg gemappt werden. Das ist natürlich blöt weil ihr die angeblich alle doppelt mappt. Alle Details einmail auf Platform (als way) und nochmal auf stop_position (als node, aber die sind in Belgien nicht so wichtig, dass die immer vorhanden sind, also nicht benutzbar als Objekt wo die Details gemappt werden können)
streckenkundler (2015-04-01 06:47:31+00:00): Hallo,
sind die Gebäude abgerissen? Dann eine Bitte: solche Dinge  als abandoned:building=* kennzeichen, verbunden mit note=Gebäude abgerissen. Dann erscheinen sie nicht mehr in der Karte. Da diese noch im Luftbild zu sehen sind, läuft man nun Gefahr, daß ein anderer diese wieder einzeichnet.

Danke,

Sven
Alecs01 (2015-03-31 18:32:20+00:00): Ciao, fai attenzione, forse non ti sei accorto che stai sovrapponendo edifici su altri edifici, non credo inoltre che siano tutti "case". Un saluto, Alessandro
nico93 (2015-04-01 07:37:37+00:00): hai ragione, purtroppo mi risultavano non fatte, non so per quale motivo
mweper (2015-03-31 20:27:00+00:00): Hola muralito.
Tengo una duda, ¿porque sacaste el junction=roundabout en las vias 38696700 y similares, si es una rotonda?
muralito (2015-03-31 21:10:16+00:00): Hola. Porque es una rotonda "en español" pero no es un "junction=roundabout" en el contexto de OSM.
Ver http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout