piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
highflyer74 (2019-11-12 17:20:42+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please stop doing what you did here. You imported data with not a single OSM tag attached to it over a wide area. This is not the way OSM works. Please make yourself familiar with OSM before continuing to map.

You can ask for help e.g. in the forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ and read other documentation in the Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page.

Thank you!
-------------------

Bonjour et bienvenue à l'OSM !

S'il vous plaît, arrêtez de faire ce que vous avez fait ici. Vous avez importé des données sans qu'aucune balise OSM ne lui soit attachée sur une vaste zone. Ce n'est pas ainsi que fonctionne l'OSM. Familiarisez-vous avec l'OSM avant de continuer à cartographier.

Vous pouvez demander de l'aide, par exemple sur le forum : https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ et lire d'autres documents dans le Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page.

Je vous remercie !
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
korolenok (2019-11-12 11:02:44+00:00): Have you seen what is happening on the osm (https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?way=26953821#map=18/48.70592/8.99118)? What's up with your editor?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76950787
Nakaner (2019-11-12 11:46:10+00:00): @korolenok see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/76956223
korolenok (2019-11-12 12:28:03+00:00): It looks much better, thanks)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76950787
nevw (2019-11-12 10:24:19+00:00): Hi,
I reverted your business addition to the OpenStreetMap for some of the reasons listed on our wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

Adding a name and all other info in a description tag is not suitable, please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 to initially help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags.
eggie (2019-11-12 10:54:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Het is helaas niet de bedoeling er dan maar een leisure=park van te maken met name=plantsoen.
In OSM mappen we wat er te zien is. leisure=park is een functie.
Leisure=park ligt als een transparante deken over alle andere landuse=* heen. 
Leisure=park geeft dus de functie weer. 
Landuse=* is wat je ziet op de grond. 
Park edits liggen bij OSM onder een vergrootglas: vaak wordt iets ten onrechte gewijzigd om zo het spel PokomonGo te kunnen beïnvloeden. 
Dat wordt gezien als vernieling van de kaart en dus worden je changesets ongedaan gemaakt. 
Als je vragen hebt, stel ze dan gerust

MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-12 11:05:53+00:00): Het park heb ik voorlopig omgezet in landuse=grass met losse bomen en de naam Plantsoen verwijderd, want zo zal het niet heten.
Je kunt de landuse natuurlijk wel intekenen. Zie daarvoor de wiki. 
MVG,
Eggie
JohnYpma (2019-11-12 13:21:33+00:00): Bedankt voor je feeback Eggie. Ik zal het bij volgende wijzigingen meenemen. Er staat in het midden nog wel een kunstvoorwerp (beeldhouwwerk). Kan ik dat ook op de één of andere manier aangeven?
eggie (2019-11-12 13:45:07+00:00): Oke. dan maak een node en daar tag je op bij
tourism=artwork
artwork_type=sculpture

evt. nog
name=*
artist_name=*
start_date=*

Zie ook
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dartwork

Succes,
Eggie
Nakaner (2019-11-12 11:46:38+00:00): Hi,

please use the development API and ensure that your application does not create empty changesets.

Best regards

Michael
ArthurMcGill (2019-11-12 14:11:01+00:00): Hallo Aixbrick,

danke für die Korrektur, Gruß, Arthur
abrensch (2019-11-17 17:14:44+00:00): Hallo Fibi02,

Du hast diese Umkehrspur auf motor_vehicle=bus gesetzt, d.h. Autos dürfen dort nicht mehr umkehren:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/101971480

ist das tatsächlich so gemeint?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
viloan (2019-11-12 10:26:55+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2019-11-12 10:59:26+00:00): 好像跟既有的步道路線重疊了
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/76953024
eggie (2019-11-12 10:56:04+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
user_5359 (2019-11-15 20:32:29+00:00): Please check the position of your node, there is no building near by your node.
cafeconleche (2019-11-12 10:45:06+00:00): No DOG di que o nome é "Barbanza" sen artigo ([1] con corrección en [2]), pero algunhas administracións usan o nome con artigo femenino (p. ex. "Hospital da Barbanza"), mentres que outras administracións usan o artigo masculino (p. ex. "Autovía do Barbanza"). Tendo en conta esta falta de consenso por parte das administracións, para o nome da comarca creo que mellor empregar o nome que é usado pola xente local, que usan o artigo masculino.

[1] https://www.xunta.gal/dog/Publicados/1997/19970403/Anuncio1051E_gl.html
[2] https://www.xunta.gal/dog/Publicados/1997/19970415/Anuncio55A6_gl.html
MapMakerGal (2019-11-12 12:23:08+00:00): O nome oficial é con A, pero como vexas...
MapMakerGal (2019-11-12 12:24:13+00:00): Aceptamos polbo como animal de compañía, non é importante.
MapMakerGal (2019-11-12 12:25:23+00:00): Eu tería posto un alt_name para non discriminar a forma oficial e iso.
OttawaHiking (2019-11-14 00:32:57+00:00): Hello! Could you please take another look at this changeset? It seems you tried to combine two wood relations (9134979 and 9135276) into one (10289025), but then you probably need to take all inner rings from both woods and put them into that new wood.
fx99 (2019-11-14 07:14:19+00:00): Thanks for the remark. I do not know how that happened. The fix is in CS 77054361.
viloan (2019-11-12 10:56:54+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-11-12 11:42:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Nakaner (2019-11-12 11:45:43+00:00): Hi,

please stop editing immediately! Your editor is broken and buggy. You are corrupting the production database used by tens of thousands of other users. Please use the development API for testing! See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing for further information.

I will revert all your changesets soon.

Please mind the Organised Editing Guidelines if you edit on behalf of your employer. https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Best regards

Michael
Ritu Shandilya (2019-11-12 12:54:18+00:00): Hi,

Thank You for reverting the changes. 
I will go through the development API as suggested.

Best Regards,
Ritu
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-12-10 10:07:13+00:00): S'il vous plaît n'étiquetez pas les highway=residential avec "name=route residentielle": cette information est superflue.
SK53 (2019-11-12 15:47:39+00:00): Hi & Welcome to OSM.

Great to see both paths and an address added in the countryside (we just need a few more thousands of each).

I've made one small change to your driveway in that I've changed it from living street to a driveway. I've also added a few of your neighbour's houses (with driveways) and the farm opposite the paths, and the  wood down to the river.: mainly so that your house doesn't look so prominent. 

I've left the path which starts by the bend  for now, although I assume it runs for a few metres along one of the drives. 

Some adjacent townlands (e.g. Upper Coole Glebe) have already been mapped with other details (buildings, hedges, farm tracks etc). You may feel it's worth adding some of these at a later time.

Best wishes,

Jerry aka SK53
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
mavl (2019-11-17 13:31:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77188339 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3265].
Nakaner-repair (2019-11-12 11:55:15+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 76706205, 76706786, 76706924, 76707031, 76707941, 76708747, 76709894, 76710265, 76710704, 76712170, 76714625, 76746642, 76749449, 76754634, 76759566, 76765327, 76765857, 76766544, 76768157, 76769790, 76798051, 76950787, 76956223, 76957536.
aachso (2019-11-12 15:09:07+00:00): Hallo Frank und willkommen bei OSM!

Das sieht soweit ganz gut aus, ich würde das aber mehr spezifisch als office=consulting taggen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:office%3Dconsulting

Vielleicht magst du noch die E-Mail-Adresse und Telefonnummer angeben? Die Tags und das gewünschte Format findest du ebenfalls im Wiki.

Danke,
aachso
eggie (2019-11-12 12:20:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

You are sure these apartments are for holyday purpuse?
and named casa??? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=apartment
Greetz,
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-12 12:53:06+00:00): reverted by changeset  #76960905
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-11-12 17:24:49+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostolic_nunciature
M!dgard (2019-11-12 12:19:54+00:00): Beste jozin-belgium

U voegt op grote schaal tankstations toe op basis van data van https://carbu.com/.

Hebt u hiervoor toelating van carbu.com?

U voegt deze gegevens waarschijnlijk toe met de beste bedoelingen, maar databanken zijn beschermd door het databankenrecht. In het slechtste geval brengt u OpenStreetMap of uzelf in juridische problemen.

Laat u alstublieft iets weten, want deze gegevens moeten zo snel mogelijk verwijderd worden als ze inbreuk maken.

Groeten
M!dgard
jozin-belgium (2022-01-25 19:01:31+00:00): Dit is meer dan twee jaar geleden reeds besproken, en sedertdien doe ik dat dus ook niet meer.
mvviveka (2019-11-12 12:26:41+00:00): Hi ,
I've used Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery to make edits in this changeset#  76959371.

Regards,
mvviveka.
KKS (2019-11-16 19:24:42+00:00): Христя привіт. Ти цим ченджсетом унеможливила проїзд по Михайлівській.
http://i.piccy.info/i9/e6e8424342eed02da846cbe5ce28ee07/1573932127/130999/1348025/khrystia001.jpg

http://i.piccy.info/i9/1f4b7c002d361ce1f2a83005ccd171da/1573932165/174680/1348025/khrystia002.jpg

В JOSM то трохи складніше робити, але  там одразу видно який рестрікшин накладається. Сама поправиш чи я виправлю?
eggie (2019-11-12 13:12:33+00:00): Je hebt nu het adres veranderd en er zijn nu twee identieke adressen. De adresnode zijn import vanuit het Kadaster.
 Schuif gewoon de viswinkel naar de goede plek. Van de echte nr 1e maak je 1a en schuift die ook naar de goede plek.
Dan tag je bij shop= florist en name=
Eggie
eggie (2019-11-12 15:19:44+00:00): De adresnode heb ik hersteld, wat die was nu duplicaat. Gelijk dan maar de bloemenwinkel erop gezet.
Městem na kole (2021-06-09 22:03:31+00:00): Wilsonova is not a bike-friendly street, feeling more like a highway, but from the legal perspective it is absolutely legal to ride a bike on this street. Please, always verify the real status and do not damage the map.
mueschel (2019-11-23 10:27:52+00:00): I reverted this changeset - it added source tags to existing nodes all over the world.
MikeN (2019-11-12 18:34:51+00:00): Hi, I noticed that the speed limits weren't marked past that intersection, and I found a message that the Tesla navigator could get confused when speed limit markings disappear suddenly.   I've added the speed limits according to the SCDOT.   I don't know how long it will take to update.   It's possible that the SCDOT may not be accurate in that area - feel free to correct it if you are familiar with the speed limits.     Also, if you collect and upload Mapillary imagery sequences, they will automatically detect speed limit signs.
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
highflyer74 (2019-11-12 17:15:16+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

Please stop doing what you did here. You imported data with not a single OSM tag attached to it over a wide area. This is not the way OSM works. Please make yourself familiar with OSM before continuing to map.

You can ask for help e.g. in the forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ and read other documentation in the Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page.

Thank you!
-------------------

Bonjour et bienvenue à l'OSM !

S'il vous plaît, arrêtez de faire ce que vous avez fait ici. Vous avez importé des données sans qu'aucune balise OSM ne lui soit attachée sur une vaste zone. Ce n'est pas ainsi que fonctionne l'OSM. Familiarisez-vous avec l'OSM avant de continuer à cartographier.

Vous pouvez demander de l'aide, par exemple sur le forum : https://forum.openstreetmap.org/ et lire d'autres documents dans le Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page.

Je vous remercie !
luschi (2019-11-14 23:28:20+00:00): Hallo,     
wenn du als Satellitenbild "South Tyrol Orthofoto 2014/2015" verwendest, sollte die Position ziemlich genau stimmen.     
Denke auch daran die Gebäude Rechtwinklig zu machen.     
Das kannst du wenn du das Gebäude anklickst und "Q" drückst. Das geht bei allen Editoren hier auf OSM.

lg     
luschi
Brego167 (2019-11-15 09:45:44+00:00): Danke für die Info! :-)
luschi (2019-11-15 17:56:34+00:00): Bitte.     
Wenn du mal Fragen hast kannst du mir gerne eine Nachricht schicken.

lg
M!dgard (2019-11-12 13:24:44+00:00): [Markdown test](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Houthalen-Helchteren)

- Markdown
- test
user_5359 (2019-11-12 17:58:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
Alhamdulillah (2019-11-18 11:35:09+00:00): The information value of "`" for others is equivalent to zero
And you probably know this ;)
Mammi71 (2019-12-15 12:12:22+00:00): hallo ebe_münzer,
Du hast vor etwa einem Monat die B95 zwischen Espenhain und Kesselshain zur secondary herabgestuft und das ref=B 95 entfernt. Mit secondary gehe ich einig, das ist richtig. Das Entfernen der ref war etwas voreilig. Bisher ist nicht bekannt, dass die B95 tatsächlich zurückgestuft wurde. Das ist geplant aber noch nicht erfolgt. Wir mappen aber nicht die Planung, sondern den Istzustand. Lt. Mapillary-Bildern vom 29.11.2019 ist die B95 aber noch ausgeschildert, wie z.B. wenige Meter von hier:
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/0UYEfsKcVfmYCNXtEgBPjA
Bitte füge ref= B 95 wieder ein. Danke. 
Der Mammi
Mammi71 (2019-12-17 20:46:54+00:00): Es wäre auch möglich, einen Teil-revert dieses Changeset durchzuführen, damit die Arbeit mit dem umtaggen auf secondary nicht umsonst war.
streckenkundler (2019-12-22 11:06:46+00:00): Teilrevert aufgrund Nutzerwunsch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78731499

Bitte ausschließlich im Forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68244 disskutieren.

Sven
eggie (2019-11-12 14:20:15+00:00): Dag John,

Je vraagt om een review. Eigenlijk zou je de leisure=garden netjes om de parking heen kunnen leggen. Het mag wel aansluiten.
covered = no kun je verwijderen. Dat is overbodig. 
Gr eggie
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
SHARCRASH (2020-05-24 18:13:44+00:00): Hi!
Please... 
- Keep a logic when you plot or change the ways according reality. I don't know why you felt the need to change how it was but it was already all correct. Here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5860891428/history
We first enter a typical foot way with a cobblestone surface and even if its' just about 1 meter away only after we encounter the gate leading to the trail... Which brings me...
- What is a wicked gate??? It's not even in OSM's Wiki. It's a "swing gate". If you feel it does not meet the requirement according the real object because of some important specifications, you first create a proposition is OSM's Wiki for the whole process. Wicked gate isn't understood by the code at all.

Thanks for you comprehension! I had to RE correct again...
mjlux (2020-05-28 13:45:43+00:00): Dear SHARCRASH,

I'm afraid your comment reads a bit like an insult, which I hope wasn't what you intended and which definitely isn't the kind of spirit we need on a collaborative site like OSM. I see all of us OSMers as partners working together on the common goal of a better map and you could have used this occasion to share your knowledge about OSM's best practices with a less experienced user like me. Instead, you wrote a rant. To be honest, I didn't even understand the first part of it - who do you mean by 'we', for example, and what exactly is it you didn't like?

As for the type of gate, I was obviously concerned to select the best possible value and did read through the wiki page on barriers extensively (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier). If you had done so as well, you would have found a picture of a wicket gate (yes, it's spelled with a 't') that really looks very much like the one I saw in Beaufort last November. The definition describes it like this: "A wicket gate, or simply a wicket, is a pedestrian door or gate, particularly one built into a larger door or into a wall or fence." The definition of a swing gate, on the other hand, talks about a much bigger thing usually made of metal bars and says it's intended to prevent cars from access. Not very fitting.

Now, if there are reasons that override what's written on the wiki and that you as a seasoned OSMer know about and I don't, I'm obviously always eager to learn. And I'm even more eager if the knowledge is shared in a friendly, encouraging and collaborative manner.
SHARCRASH (2020-06-02 10:47:02+00:00): Hi! It was not meant as an insult, nor a rant. It just had a "tired" tone because as soon as i see an element which does not correspond at all to reality, i correct it, i don't skip and there is a lot. And it's more frustrating when these interfere with new contributions i'd like to enter precisely or others I already contributed but got changed to something exotic or which does not correspond to reality. 

For the gate i admit, i missed the "t", my mind retained "wicked"... Sorry! There are so many now it is hard to keep track when it is not a common tag. People want to detail so much but then most people won't handle it anyway. In fact it is good that you corrected, myself i was mistaken with "swing gate", it does not correspond. So for this sorry and thank you! "wicket_gate" is not yet recognized, i had searched with a "d" too which explains why i did not find it. Anyway, i've tagged it as "gate" for the reasons i told you here before and on a path or footway, it is very obvious that it is no large gate.
mjlux (2020-06-17 15:28:41+00:00): Thank you, SHARCRASH. So what lesson can I learn from this? That I should use whatever is on the wiki, except if it's something exotic? How do I know what is "exotic"?
SHARCRASH (2020-06-19 09:24:59+00:00): I'm also learning in the process. The  question we can ask ourselves is: is it worth to differentiate similar features slightly different with 2 different tags? Example: barrier=gate, barrier=wicket_gate, barrier=sliding_gate, barrier=hampshire_gate, etc if any other. All these physical features perform the same function: restricting access whether the person is by foot, bicycle, car, truck... the final result will be the same. On another hand, barrier=chain also "prevents" access but the final result won't be the same for all kinds of users, people by foot can still cross it if they want and if allowed depending of the reason. The matter that it restricts to a private propriety will be rather defined with the access tag. So it is very relevant to differentiate a barrier=gate from a barrier=chain

Once i talked with another contributor and he made the joke that OSM contributors are quite close to invent new tags for what kind of door handle we have at door entrances... This cracked me up! Indeed we are indeed so close. We don't have all the same kind of sensibility towards "purposes", so the right balance between both must be found is special occasions. It is great to have a very detailed map but it can become very confusing or even unreliable when it is too much crowded with futile elements. 

Also, did you noticed how the map background has become very unresponsive lately and that the OSM Foundation is seeking again for new servers? The fact that the OSM data is becoming ever more complex in many ways is one of the causes.