piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Glassman (2022-03-24 22:57:20+00:00): Check out the Maxar premium imagery in the editor - it's not as clear as Bing but you can see the new building. 

Also area=yes is vague - it looks like a parking structure in the maxar imagery but I can be sure.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118797849
josmougn (2023-12-08 22:00:04+00:00): Bonjour,
Quel est l'objet représenté par ce nœud : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9598457601
Merci.
fgouget (2023-12-11 00:24:18+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est une erreur. Ce point aurait dû être confondu avec le poteau à coté d'où part la ligne souterraine.

J'ai fait la correction.
Merci du signalement.
eggie (2022-06-05 19:25:14+00:00): Dag Teek... Hier heb ik toch maar weer de landuse aangevuld..  'k Vermoed dat dat werk nog is blijven liggen. Mijn advies zou zijn toch kleine stukjes te verwijderen of aan te passen en dan pas met het volgende project te starten. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-23 06:36:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback..  Er hoeft geen adres op de gebouwomtrek in OSM. Er zijn al adresnodes.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-03-23 06:41:43+00:00): Adres verwijderd.. 
Gr eggie
Tomas Straupis (2022-03-23 07:31:30+00:00): Duomenų gadinimas. Pakeitimas atšauktas.
217541OSM (2023-12-15 08:36:52+00:00): Did you actually count the number of steps wow
stst415 (2023-12-16 01:01:08+00:00): Haha!  No.  I found the number online.  :-)
ivanatora (2022-03-24 07:56:43+00:00): Защо е изтрит пътя?
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 16:48:51+00:00): Пътя е върнат в промяна 118872982.
ivanatora (2022-03-24 07:54:44+00:00): Ще те помоля да върнеш изтритите пътища. Ако е необходимо, може да се направи прекласификация на таговете, но изтриването не е начина.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 16:56:27+00:00): Промяната е върната в промяна 118873224.
ivanatora (2022-03-24 07:50:46+00:00): Премахнатите пътища съществуват по сателитните снимки и са трасирани с GPS следи. Защо са премахнати?
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 16:59:43+00:00): Промяната е върната в 118873364.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-23 14:27:22+00:00): Откъде са тези "официални данни"? Имаш ли линк към тях?
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 16:54:23+00:00): Промяната е върнат в промяна 118873173.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-23 10:28:57+00:00): Вероятно не те интересува факта, че ако стане някой пожар в района, пожарникарите има да обикалят докато намерят как да стигнат до мястото на огнището.
ivanatora (2022-03-24 07:48:29+00:00): aiknenkov, използвай access таговете, където е необходимо. Изтриването на валидни данни от OSM е погрешно и не помага на никой.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-24 17:02:42+00:00): Промяната е върната в 118873467.
Dimitar155 (2022-03-23 10:30:43+00:00): Пътищата са маркирани с access=private, което показва на маршрутизаторите че не може да се мине през този път. За да ти отговоря на въпроса, хола ми не се намира на улицата, че да минава някой през него.
marczoutendijk (2022-03-23 18:45:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5819
pertile (2022-03-23 11:51:14+00:00): Hola, me parece que estás confundiendo name con description. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Nombre_es_solo_el_nombre
tastrax (2022-03-23 05:06:15+00:00): With such good Bing imagery in this area it would be good if you could more closely digitise the buildings. You can also 'square' the corners of the buildings using the Q key on your keyboard to make them much neater. Check out how I have updated this house. Cheers
CurlingMan13 (2024-01-07 04:56:17+00:00): Where did you get the addresses from?
svance92 (2024-01-07 15:00:25+00:00): The pre-processed RapID dataset - https://openstreetmap.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=324d9fd420a2485aa7f56b2b1a25d37b

It includes both geometry of building and a few basic tags to validate.
MappingMaiden (2022-05-16 19:38:13+00:00): Hi Joshua Almeida, thanks for mapping! I noticed you and other mappers using hashtags #opensidewalks #opensidewalks-lapa #AI4Accessibility have added “barrier=kerb” tags in this area. Some of those barriers intersect vehicle navigable roads in several places such as: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9598557006, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9598697829, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4257006396. This means they will block any car or truck routing at those locations. 

I think you are trying to map places where there are curbs for sidewalks or crosswalks and I noticed OSM policy for “barrier=kerb” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dkerb) says “Combining with highway=crossing is usually a mistake; include kerb=* on the crossing node, but *not* barrier=kerb as there will usually not be a kerb across the major highway, though there could be a traffic_calming=table”. 

So I am wondering if the “barrier=kerb” nodes that intersect with vehicle navigable highways such as (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9598695318) could be updated to one of the values at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb? If so we can change them to kerb=yes and then you can add the appropriate type. 

Thanks, and let me know if you have any questions!
Quentin Golsteyn (2022-06-19 02:55:12+00:00): Hello, saw these two new peaks pop up. Curious as to where they received their names as I could not find any info on them online
eerib (2022-06-20 21:53:46+00:00): I heard about these peaks after reading a post in the "Bagger Challenge" Facebook group (linked below), did some research, and found a very old map of the area with the peaks labelled. Unfortunately, I cannot recall the map I found the peaks on at the moment. There isn't much of a recent use of the naming hence why I added the informal=yes tag, even though it doesn't have an established use for peaks, because neither of these peaks have been accepted by an administrative body (i.e. the Geographical Names Board of Canada, Province of BC, District of West Vancouver). 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/baggerchallenge/

I'm indecisive for keeping the peaks, removing them, or changing to natural=hill. The "South Knob" could be confused with the other knob Northwest of Eagle Lake that is also informally called the "South Knob" (see link below), which could be a safety issue.

https://forums.clubtread.com/27-british-columbia/94948-highlands-trail-near-horseshoe-bay.html
nevw (2022-03-23 04:13:17+00:00): Hi
I fixed a power line and pole you accidentally dragged and added the grassed area encompassing the bridleway
WodahS_1 (2022-03-27 08:21:37+00:00): omg thank you, i was doing it quickly and didn't realise that I did that
GinaroZ (2022-03-23 11:53:30+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding the buildings. Just to make you aware that in some places the Bing imagery is slightly out of alignment.
If you turn on the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels layer you can then add an offset to Bing so it lines up better :)
gpulham (2022-03-23 11:55:57+00:00): Ace, I'll do that and apply a group translation/rotation as needed later on tonight.

Thanks for the review
Herman Lee (2022-04-13 03:04:49+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119645292
ElliottPlack (2022-03-25 03:06:08+00:00): Hi there, tell me about these ref tags. Are they signed references, e.g. trailblazed things that are visible on the ground, or rather a utility to help organize the routes in the relation editor tool. While I appreciate good order in the relations, the ref or name tag should not be used for any 'mapper' purpose. Those data types have some meaning (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions ) If you'd like to put stuff like that in a note, feel free, but for things that are not observable on the ground, please don't misuse the ref fields.

-- Elliott Plack  
OSMF Data Working Group
AlwynWellington (2022-03-27 14:12:35+00:00): Elliott, thank you for your observations
Context 
The California Mission Trail (CMT) is about 900 miles (1,400 km).  It links 21 historic mission stations ranging from San Diego in the south to Sonoma (around 40 km north of San Francisco).  It is about 60 days of walking.
It is my understanding that the only signage is at the 21 mission stations and this is not about the route.
The generality of the route is well canvassed in printed publications and can also be found at MissionWalk.org
I am not aware of any proposal to sign this route.
In my experience the “signage” and description (including KML or GPX files) of many routes are now found in hard or soft publications (books and web sites) and not along the route.  A good example in my experience in 2018 is Via Francigena in France.  Over 600 km I found one marker a few hours after leaving Rheims and never found another.
My route marking for CMT is very much a work in progress.  I hope to walk it starting in 2024.
Route mapping considerations
There is a discussion in the wiki about how many elements should be in each route as mapped.  Last time I looked the suggested upper limit was 400.  The reasoning, as I recall, was the ease/difficulty of maintenance.
Naming the sections
The wiki on mapping routes suggested using the various tools in WayMarkedTrails.org to see the results of routes used by individuals.  See the results when a taxonomy is not used organization 
I was very keen to avoid the, for me, very unhelpful references and names for sections of the American Discovery Trail (relation 1544944)
Rather I seek to follow the style used for sections of the Empire State Trail (EST, relation 11682611).  Even in this route signage at significant points is not present.  I refer to the junction of Cannon Street and Veteran Memorial Avenue, Cohoes, New York State.  Here one section ends, and two major alternative sections start.  StreetView (image capture 2019) shows the only signage as being for road names and truck directions and nothing for EST.
Looking ahead
I agree the name you note is a mouthful and is work in progress.
And I am considering having only 20 sections, one for the route between one mission station and the next.  Focussing on a nominal days march is an arbitrary division.
Subject to the nominal 400 element limit, I have contemplated naming each section “CMT xx Mission x to Mission Y”.  Thus users of WayMarkedTrails get some value and not a less helpful reference.
I would appreciate your comments on how to create meaningful names that can be sourced from the literature and which indicated a normal sequence.

Alan
cyton (2022-03-23 20:25:46+00:00): ja, ich weiß, wegen wandrer, aber auf meinen bildern sieht das aus wie eine einfahrt, die aber keine ist. winerseits wegen der breite des tores, aber auch irgendwie wegen der breite des weges selber.

ich muss da nochmal vorbei das genau ansehen
StefanHRT (2022-03-24 00:42:10+00:00): War nicht wegen wandrer sondern eher wegen dem erhöhten Bordstein, da kann man doch nicht problemlos mit dem Rad drüber fahren sondern muss eh absteigen um sich den Reifen/die Felge nicht kaputt zu fahren ;)
CloCkWeRX (2022-07-03 04:27:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042811149 isn't abandoned railway, it's completely removed. The only trace remaining is a path, which is mapped separately.
CloCkWeRX (2023-02-07 12:33:31+00:00): I'm removing https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042811149
wolfbert (2025-06-03 14:51:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/744114682 ist service, aber auch in einer Begegnungszone. Damit das wirkt, müsste sie aber living_street sein ...
Luzandro (2025-06-04 11:02:45+00:00): Stimmt, wenn ich die paar Pixel bei Apple richtig interpretiere, ist auch am westlichen Ende beim Übergang zum Fußweg ein Begegnungszone-Ende-Schild: https://maps.apple.com/look-around?address=Römerstraße+21A%2C+6070+Ampass%2C+Austria&coordinate=47.2619887%2C11.4657029&name=Römerstraße+21A&_mvs=Ci0J%2BkG3Xo6hR0ARBPRutFvuJkAZAACYyvUShUAhOmMqjAujckAphb6qZHox8z8%3D

wo Richtung Süden Anfang/Ende ist, konnte ich jetzt aber nicht nachvollziehen - anscheinend ist auch vor dem Kindergarten, auf der östlichen Seite ein Ende-Schild zu sehen: https://maps.apple.com/look-around?address=Kapelläcker+17%2C+6070+Ampass%2C+Austria&coordinate=47.2629866%2C11.4666663&name=Kapelläcker+17&_mvs=Ci0JW92YF6qhR0ARAaBRlOzuJkAZAGBgSN7whEAhz43YcXEBbEApcfV6XYK5I0A%3D

ich habe einmal den User hierher verwiesen, der die Begegnungszone angelegt hat
aw_LT (2025-06-04 14:13:50+00:00): Servus, also meine Vor-Ort-Erhebung ergibt:
Bei der Einfahrt M-Preis ist keine Begegnungszone ausgeschildert, am Weg hinter der Schule ist ebenfalls keine Tafel, der Schulparkplatz ist Teil der Begegnungszone und das Zonen-Ende-Schild ist beim Sportplatz (wie vermutet).
Vor der Schule (beim Spielplatz) ist auf der Ostseite die Zonengrenze beschildert, ist halt ein Fußweg.
Somit auch vor Ort (für mich) nicht erhebbar, wo die südliche Begrenzung sein soll.
AngocA (2022-03-24 02:18:20+00:00): Hola Santy458, en Colombia no hay motorway, que son autopistas en otros países del mundo. Revisa la guía de mapeo: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Colombia/Gu%C3%ADa_para_mapear#Motorizadas
GOwin (2022-03-24 04:57:59+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap (OSM), and thank you for helping improve the map.

In OSM, the convention is to avoid abbreviations, so you might want to spell out "St." as "Street". The map layer will render the abbreviations, if necessary.  For more info, see https://osm.org/wiki/Abbreviation

If you're keen to know more about mapping, check out the following free resources:

 ∙ Beginner's Mapping guide - https://osm.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide 
∙ Intermediate/Advanced self-paced learning modules - https://learnosm.org 
 ∙ Local mappers - https://osm.org/wiki/PH 

 The most interactive channel for local mappers is their Telegram channel: https://t.me/OSMph
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-08-14 22:37:04+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3834162 ?
user_5359 (2022-03-23 17:00:38+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1042621996. What ist the meaning of the tags
TIPO = Solar
cronologia = 1742
?
gscholz (2022-03-23 17:16:11+00:00): Hi,
please ask the inventor of these attributes.
Guido
archpdx (2022-03-23 07:38:35+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding these road names. Please note in the future that we don't abbreviate street names in OSM (https://wiki.osm.org/abbreviation). For example, 'Rock Creek Court' instead of 'Rock Creek Ct'. I've unabbreviated the names added in this changeset, but you might want to go back to your other edits to see if any more could be unabbreviated. You can look at your previous changesets here:
https://osm.org/user/azurebird/history
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118803150
antonr (2022-11-27 20:03:56+00:00): Hej b-holdet,

Der er ingen kilde her, men derimod nogle 100m østpå[1]... Så vidt jeg husker har jeg fjernet denne forkerte placering én gang allerede. Har jeg overset noget der tilsiger at kilden burde markeres her?

Mvh

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1039877745
b-holdet (2022-11-27 20:20:43+00:00): Jeg har det fra SDFE Stednavne
antonr (2022-11-27 20:47:19+00:00): Det forstår jeg (thumbs up for grundig source-angivelse i changeset). Der må være unøjagtige data i stednavneregisteret (måske er det en sammenblanding af kilden/parken/friluftsscenen?), for der ér ikke nogen kilde ved placeringen for 9598839754, og der ér en kilde + en sten med en tekst ala "Sct. Knuds Kilde" ved 1039877745.

1039877745 var forøvrigt oprettet da du importerede 9598839754, så et check på navn inden import kunne måske have forhindret dublet :-)

Jeg foreslår sletning af 9598839754, men eftersom jeg har forsøgt det én gang, vil jeg gerne høre dit input inden jeg gør noget.

Mvh
b-holdet (2022-11-28 06:47:09+00:00): SDFE-punktet er fjernet nu. Det skal nok lige meldes ind til SDFE-stednavne, at placeringen er forkert.
user_5359 (2022-04-11 19:56:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/965141853. What is the meaning of highway=u?
PlaneMad (2022-04-12 04:05:49+00:00): Sorry looks like an error on my end. Please fix it to unclassified as I’m not able to edit at this time.
user_5359 (2022-04-12 05:35:18+00:00): Done! I updated seven highways (six additional highways in Naga Bazar).

You are welcome!
PlaneMad (2022-04-12 19:07:33+00:00): Thank you
Filip009 (2022-03-25 10:14:50+00:00): Ahoj, toto nemusíš robiť ručne, pozri https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/Umu4DtD7VFk
Maroš Klempa (2022-03-28 07:20:13+00:00): Ahoj. Ten návod je pre začiatočníka nanič. Podľa neho nespravím ani čiarku.
Filip009 (2022-03-28 09:13:03+00:00): Ja len, že keby si to chcel robiť presnejšie a rýchlejšie. Súhlasím, že pre začiatočníka je to náročnejšie, ale nič, čo by sa nedalo naučiť ;)
Maroš Klempa (2022-03-31 13:39:45+00:00): Určite by som sa to vedel naučiť, ale podľa rozumného step-by-step návodu pre začiatočníka. A nie to čo napísal niekto v tom odkaze čo si zdieľal.
jcr83 (2022-03-23 07:49:20+00:00): Corrections invalides sur les chemins https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68526361 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/236226732
al Malinvern signifie "vers le Malinvern" en italien et a été transformé en "Allée Malinvern".
jcr83 (2022-03-23 08:05:40+00:00): Je pense que le plus simple serait de supprimer le nom ou de le remplacer par direction=Malinvern
Marcussacapuces91 (2022-03-23 09:33:00+00:00): I just revert my changes. I should not change anything in other countries
akadouri (2022-03-24 02:39:18+00:00): Hello,

Is there a reason to change all these tags to have the "contact:" prefix? It does not seem necessary.
user_5359 (2022-03-24 05:18:46+00:00): We have two methods of noting contact options and it makes sense not to accept mixed forms. However, as instagram contacts are currently written with contact:instagram (see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=instagram), I have used this notation and adapted the notation of the phone number at the same time.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:52:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
SnowDiver (2022-03-23 10:22:08+00:00): Ist nur das vordere Stück des Ellerbrooks jetzt keine Einbahnstraße mehr? Plausibler würde mir erscheinen, wenn der hintere Teil, der parallel zur Bahn und zum Wiebusch verläuft (also der gesamte Ellerbrook) ebenfalls keine Einbahnstraße mehr ist.
SnowDiver (2022-03-23 11:01:18+00:00): Hallo Andy, kleiner Nachtrag:

Es scheint doch alles richtig gemappt worden zu sein.

Mapillary-Bild 157970943008307 zeigt, dass der hintere Teil Einbahnstraße ist. Mapillary Bild 516522466144321 zeigt, dass das kurze Stück keine Einbahnstraße ist - wie von Dir gemappt. Ist aber eine sehr merkwürdige Verkehrsführung. Der Way-Historie kann ich entnehmen, dass ich sogar selbst die Einbahnstraße auf dem kurzen Stück hier letztes Jahr eingetragen habe. Kann das nicht mehr so genau nachvollziehen, was die Gründe waren.

Also, es scheint, als sei alles jetzt richtig eingetragen. Ich bin in den nächsten Wochen vor Ort und achte da nochmal genauer drauf. 

Bitte entschuldige die Verwirrung.

Gruß SnowDiver
AndySchulte (2022-03-23 11:29:44+00:00): Hallo SnowDiver, ich gebe die recht, die Verkehrsführung ist in der Tat verwirrend.

Ich habe die Änderung aufgrund einer Meldung eines NUNAV Navigation Nutzers vorgenommen, der uns das berichtete.
Meine Rückfrage, ob nur das Stück oder die komplette Straße, ist leider noch unbeantwortet.

Wenn du dort demnächst vor Ort bist, wäre es super, wenn du dir das mal anschaust.
Die Mapillary Bilder habe ich mir vorher auch angeschaut, da diese nicht sehr alt sind, sollte es passen.

Gruß Andy
AndySchulte (2022-03-23 15:08:29+00:00): Hallo nochmals, der Nutzer hat mir "der Rest ist Einbahnstraße geblieben "geantwortet. Also alles richtig.

Gruß Andy
SnowDiver (2022-03-23 19:17:09+00:00): Alles klar. Danke! 
Gruß
Warin61 (2022-03-23 22:46:46+00:00): Planned? 
A politicians promise ... been made before ... 8 years ago ... and some decades before that too. 

How are the car parks going?
JoeG (2022-03-24 01:40:12+00:00): I haven't fully understood lifecycle prefixes, so happy to take your advice on whether it should be planned.
I mapped it so that there is a reference point around which to map other landscape features, in light of the new $5.4B election promise (while recognising approval processes still have a lot to do!)
Warin61 (2022-03-25 07:28:38+00:00): The Bradfield Scheme has been around for many decades... real engineering evaluations have rejected it... 
Politically it sounds good, probably wins votes. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:proposed
"This is frequently used to describe projects that are abandoned, planned to start in a distant future and ones that are de facto fictional."

I would very much wait to see real plans with allocated money and tenders going out. not political gestures.
JoeG (2022-03-25 07:55:42+00:00): Looks like there's an inconsistency in the wiki because the lifecycle page lists both proposed and planned as "Planned, with a high likelihood of being constructed" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
JoeG (2022-03-25 08:01:34+00:00): Note that this is definitely not the Bradfield scheme. The proposed height of the dam is too low for that, and some are upset about it. Note that I don't plan to map any other proposed features (e.g. the extent of the dam and location of agricultural areas). This is the minimum needed but also sufficient to put Hells Gates in context.
Warin61 (2023-10-05 00:58:55+00:00): This is no longer 'planned'. Scrapped in the government budget of October 2022... some say it was an election promise...
Violaine_Do (2022-12-07 19:54:56+00:00): Ia Ora Na, j'ai corrigé 2 3 petites choses : la religion c'est le religion "source " christianisme, etc, et c'est dans denomination qu'on spécifie. Et j'ai remis le type club de sport sur le batiment de sport car le nom n'est pas supposé être descriptif du type de bati, les tags si. N'hésite pas à revenir vers moi pour des détails, Mauruuru roa pour ta contribution
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118805498
trial (2022-05-21 21:01:11+00:00): bonjour et bienvenus dans OpenStreetMAp (oui ça fait deux mois que j'ai vu vore modification).
Le commentaire est bon par contre vous n'vez pas ajouté une pharamie mais... un hôpital !
Heuresement Osmose vous propose de corriger :
amenity = pharmacy
name = Pharmacie du Plessis
ref:FR:SIRET = 50995652000019
source = INSEE - 2022-05 

https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/byuser/Sasha%20Et%20Loriane
guerda (2022-03-24 08:53:32+00:00): Hi KarolisG! The changesets you made are spanning across whole Europe and contain little changes (4 nodes/ways). To make your changes more transparent, please consider smaller geographical changesets. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Sanniu (2022-03-23 07:47:33+00:00): Hi

It seems like Mundi adding many trash nodes to the map, like this - crossing not on the road.
Please avoid using that app.
maraf24 (2022-03-23 08:17:50+00:00): Cudujesz.
Temat-Droga (2022-03-23 13:36:49+00:00): Prawie urwałem sobie koło i zawieszenie...
puchaczowsky (2022-03-23 16:38:41+00:00): nie wiem czy to odpowiedni argument żeby zmieniać kategorie drogi i prowadzić ją naokoło
maraf24 (2022-03-23 20:06:33+00:00): W przypadku nawigacji ta zmiana nic nie da. Dalej poprowadzi prosto.
MarcoR (2025-05-14 20:37:48+00:00): Ciao cxc!

Con questo changeset in particolare hai inserito il tag operator="Comune di Carrara" su nodi che non hanno altri tag; un esempio è https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1716731020 ma in totale dovrebbero essere circa 175 nodi (più altri 10-11 modificati/creati da altri changeset);

Che ne pensi se rimuovo quel tag da quei nodi?

I nodi in oggetto dovrebbero essere tutti quelli individuati da questa query Overpass-Turbo: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/248o

Buon mapping,
Marco.
cxc (2025-05-15 09:28:35+00:00): Buongiorno 
Direi che sarebbe cosa buona e giusta;-)
Grazie
MarcoR (2025-05-15 20:32:24+00:00): Grazie a te,
ho appena rimosso i tag in questione con il changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166322935

Per qualsiasi problema, commenta pure, scrivi un messaggio oppure "reverta" ;)

Buon mapping,
Marco.