piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SekeRob (2022-10-04 09:08:02+00:00): While there added traffic_signal direction to a bunch.
cxc (2022-10-04 17:03:30+00:00): please read this :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Photo_linking
kmpoppe (2022-10-05 05:19:29+00:00): Good morning,

I don't see what you want to tell me with linking the wiki article.

The article clearly shows that the key in question is supposed to have mapillary's image ID. This ID is now numerical instead of alpha-numerical, which this script changed.

Please elaborate what your issue is with this change.

Thank you.
cxc (2022-10-05 13:16:07+00:00): I didn't know it had been changed.
Regards
Vonter (2022-10-12 05:36:35+00:00): Hello!

Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed that you have been adding a lot of highways and roads in Bangalore, which is nice to see!

There are a couple of cases though where I've been seeing roads being tagged incorrectly, or roads which I know don't exist, based on ground experience, are getting added to the map. Like in this case, the roads which have been marked inside Lalbagh as Residential Roads, are unlikely to be so since the park is primarily meant to be used by pedestrians for walking. Please go through the Wiki for more details on how a particular road can best be tagged: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways#Classification

I have also noticed that you're adding the #ola hashtag to every changeset. Is this mapping activity that you're involved with being organized by Ola? If yes, it would be good to go through the Organized Editing Wiki page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing

Also, general tips and good practices for mapping on OSM that can be helpful are available on these Wiki pages:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map

In case of any questions or if you are not sure how to proceed with certain types of mapping, please approach the OSM India community https://community.osm.be/resources/asia/india/
silversurfer83 (2022-10-05 08:49:21+00:00): Hi
I don't believe the city name belongs into the name of the company here. It's just one outlet of many. It's located in Korbach, yes, but this doesn't go into the name tag
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126982731
VLD524 (2022-11-16 13:52:36+00:00): At the Enterprise Website https://www.matratzen-concord.de/filialen/korbach/b884.html we read in big letters Matratzen Concord Filiale Korbach.
But I agree, formally the town is not part of the name. I considered helpful putting it (inspired a bit by the website).
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
PT-53 (2022-10-05 05:58:10+00:00): Hallo Trebegh,
gem. Maps4BW sowie den amtlichen Daten im Geoportal-BW gibt es in Albstadt keine Straße namens Sandgrube. Sandgrube ist (nur) der Name der Siedlung, bzw. des Bauernhofes.
Anstatt addr:street=Sandgrune sollte deshalb addr:place=Sandgrube für die Adresse verwendet werden.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
woodpeck (2023-03-11 12:25:22+00:00): Hello jozin-belgium, can you explain why in this changeset you added a building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100806940 that you had already added four times before in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100667085, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100618868, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100615226, and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1100614551? Having the same building in OSM five times is not a good use of our resources. Maybe there is a bug in "MapComplete" that led you to this? If so, maybe it should be reported to the software author.
jozin-belgium (2025-07-10 20:27:03+00:00): Hello Woodpeck, I remember that there were a lot of problems with this software MapComplete at that time. These problems have been resolved since this year 2025.
aTarom (2022-10-04 10:25:37+00:00): Hola Axi_Zarautz
Bienvenido !
disculpa la ignorancia,
qué se quiere indicar exactamente con la etiqueta

"Femalecup"="yes"
en
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6976333623/history

Saludos y gracias por editar

PD: Una chulada la web
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2022-10-05 16:19:32+00:00): Здравствуйте. Эти теги не поймут  программы и люди, не знающие русский язык.   
  
museum_type=Музей федерального значения  
museum_type=регионального значения  
  
Значения тегов указываются на английском языке. Значения тега museum_type можно посмотреть в вики-документации:  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:museum_type  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/221508533
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Mahmut Furkan ÇAT (2022-10-04 11:07:47+00:00): 2
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2022-10-05 16:22:46+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок добавляет непрямоугольное здание. Чтобы это исправить в редакторе есть команда "Сделать углы прямыми". И название "Ялуторовск" пишется с большой буквы.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:44:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
silversurfer83 (2022-10-05 08:49:36+00:00): suburb
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126985248
VLD524 (2022-11-16 13:59:23+00:00): Hello,
Ok, changed, according to the comment: added the suburb in the tag list, putting the main city only in the address field.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
silversurfer83 (2022-10-05 08:49:50+00:00): suburb
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126985793
VLD524 (2022-11-16 13:58:46+00:00): Hello,
Ok, changed, according to the comment: added the suburb in the tag list, putting the main city only in the address field.
user_5359 (2022-10-04 10:55:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
ivanbranco (2022-10-07 15:47:24+00:00): Ciao Mr_Godot,

in realtà non hai cambiato da "strada a sentiero" ma hai cambiato highway=via_ferrata ad highway=path, vedi: https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/574726245
Era tua intenzione?

Inoltre i valori di accesso si aggiungono solo quando c'è un divieto esplicito, dubito che prima di una ferrata ci sia un cartello che vieta il transito ai cavalli :p

Buon mapping!
pitfire (2022-10-10 04:10:06+00:00): Hallo staka-RBK_01,

warum eine Löschung des Fussweges ohne jede Bemerkung oder Begründung. Die Darstellung wird noch sehr lange in den Luftbildern div. Kartendarstellungen erkennbar bleiben. So z.B. in "TIM-online. Amtliche Geobasisdaten für NRW."
Es gibt mehrer Möglichkeiten, die Historie zu erhalten. "Lifecycle prefix"
Durch den Präfix kann sichergestellt werden, dass Objekte, die es noch gibt oder die verfallen, geschlossen oder entfernt wurden, von Renderern und Anwendungen anders als existente Objekte behandelt werden. 
Auch ein "Dienstlicher Account der Kreisverwaltung des Rheinisch-Bergischen Kreises." sollte sich an die 
Gepflogenheiten der Kartierung halten!
Gruß pitfire
skyper (2023-02-14 20:24:45+00:00): Hallo R4ss1lon,
warum hast Du denn die Gebäude alle verschoben, z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118978587?
Bitte verwende den Hintergrund "Maps4BW" für Gebäude. Dieser ist sehr Lage genau und eignet sich gut dafür die anderen Hintergründe entsprechend auszurichten. Kannst Du das bitte noch einmal überarbeiten? Danke.
Viele Grüße,
skyper
Sergiy Kozyr (2022-10-04 18:51:18+00:00): Пожалуйста, не переименовывайте топонимы. Используйте тег name:ru. Он отображается во всех навигаторах с русской локализацией
bxl-forever (2022-10-08 08:35:13+00:00): Hello,

Congratulations about the new shop.

Just one problem: There is no official housenumber 14 here.  I surveyed the boulevard this morning, as well as the underground shopping gallery (named The Mint) to look if Kruidvat was about to open here somewhere, and it was nowhere to be found.  We have no vacant shops here at the moment, and it’s unlikely an existing shop will depart overnight to make space for it.

Do you have any indication about where it can be?  Possibly the name of the shop it is supposed to replace.

Thanks in advance.
borishag (2022-10-10 08:33:10+00:00): Hi,

I have checked with our property management dept.  All shops in this shopping center have the same housenumer (14) There are unitnumbers, but they are not for public usage. I will ask about which shop we are going to replace.
Tomas Straupis (2022-12-04 08:25:42+00:00): Laba diena. O kas čia yra? KVR'as nieko istorinio šitoje vietoje nerodo.
Vaidotas (2022-12-04 15:49:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3226654
Tomas Straupis (2022-12-05 06:02:23+00:00): Chrm. Vis tiek nelabai supratau, kokia archeologinė vertybė yra šitoje vietoje? Jei gerai suprantu, kažkada ten buvo kažkokia gyvenvietė, vieno iš joje buvusių pastatų liekanos būgtais matomos?
Tomas Straupis (2022-12-05 06:08:40+00:00): Lietuvoje yra tūkstančiai išnykusių kaimų. Mes OSM'e paliekame tik neseniai dingusius kaip place=locality. Čia kalba, kaip suprantu, apie prieš šimtmetį dingusį kaimą, kurio net lietuviško pavadinimo nėra. Tai tai 100% ne archeologinis taškas ir 99% ne place=locality.
Vaidotas (2022-12-05 16:28:33+00:00): Mačiau kelis kaimus pažymėtus vokiškais pavadinimais, tai galvojau, kad tokių taškų dėjimas yra įprasta praktika. Kaip elgtis šiuo atveju? Ištrinti?
Tomas Straupis (2022-12-05 16:34:39+00:00): Taip, jei nėra jokio archeologinio objekto, tai ir nežymime jo tokiu. Aš dar suprantu, jei turim DAUG info (tarkim koks Rambyno piliakalnis realiai yra nuplautas, tai jo taškas realiai turėtų būti Nemune). Bet kai turim tiesiog pavadinimą iš seno žemėlapio, tai jam OSM'e ne vieta.
ptarac (2022-10-08 17:14:52+00:00): Przy dodawaniu ławki przesunąłeś trawnik. Popraw to proszę.
ptarac (2022-10-08 17:36:27+00:00): Jeśli usunąłeś nieistniejące sklepy to wypada dodać te które istnieją.
Z Twojego opisu zmian nie wynika skąd masz wiedzę na temat aktualności. Jeśli z wizyty na miejscu to proszę dodawaj 'survey'.
ptarac (2022-10-08 17:17:05+00:00): W opisie zmian piszemy co zmieniliśmy. Dlatego daruj sobie, ze coś zostało przeniesione dawno...
ptarac (2022-10-08 17:17:35+00:00): Ponadto przydałyby się godziny otwarcia etc.
ptarac (2022-10-08 17:19:53+00:00): Dodaj proszę tagi wskazujące, że masz znajduje się na dachu budynku.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-04 13:35:00+00:00): Cześć!
Dwa landuse'y residential nie powinny się nakładać. Dodatkowo jak chcesz oznaczyć ogród to użyj leisure=garden
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:40:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-04 13:36:27+00:00): Czemu rozdzielasz drogi skoro mają takie same tagi?
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-04 13:36:50+00:00): Budynki nie powinny mieć nazw opisowych jak "DOM".
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-10-04 15:39:11+00:00): Dag Rick.. Je info heb ik samengevoegd met de BAG adresnode.
Gr eggie
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
kwiatek_123 (2022-10-04 13:39:37+00:00): Zmieniłeś nazwę tylko części ulicy Beskidzkiej. Czy tak miało być?
HD50C (2022-10-04 15:32:37+00:00): Hmm chyba nie, mialo iść do końca...
Marek-M (2022-10-04 19:44:50+00:00): Ponadto nie skracamy nazwy ulicy. M należałoby rozwinąć do imienia.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126989767
Marek-M (2022-10-04 19:54:01+00:00): @HD50C - skąd masz dane temat nazwy ulicy, bo przeszukuję Internet pod kątem 'Jakszta' w Gdyni i nie ma nic oprócz jednego archiwalnego ogłoszenia sprzedaży mieszkania przy tej ulicy :)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:34:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Emilius123 (2022-10-04 12:13:28+00:00): Emilius123
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SHARCRASH (2022-10-11 09:47:35+00:00): Aussi vous aviez mis ce chemin complètement comme footway et au tracé zigzag or il y a aussi des escaliers aussi que j'ai du ajouter: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1102829824 Pratique à savoir pour les personnes handicapées.
SHARCRASH (2022-10-11 09:51:15+00:00): Pardon je parlais de ce chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/590554478/ qui avant selon vous faisait presque tout le tour du batiment.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:39:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:35:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:37:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-10-16 10:47:00+00:00): Hello Again. 
Here you connected most buildings to each other and to roads. These are errors.
Another mapper spend a lot of time to correct these issues, which he could use better to map on this project.
Best regards.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126990796
SHARCRASH (2022-10-11 09:52:36+00:00): Bonjour! Sur ce chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520313192 vous avez spécifié en V4 le tag sidewalk sur les 2 cotés du chemin or c'est faux, seulement une partie du coté exterieur du rond point, coté droit selon la direction de l'élément OSM.

Idem faux pour les https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/346614918 et  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/414190012

Dans le logiciel...
avant correction:
https://i.imgur.com/UCpRBGH.jpg
après correction:
https://i.imgur.com/Dx4V1KC.jpg

Merci d'avance de faire plus attention afin de ne pas désinformer  les utilisateurs.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:43:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:36:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
user_5359 (2022-10-07 06:53:27+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tags 
Gång = Gå
promenad = Promenad
There is a key (only 3 times used) promenade.
Please notice also the difference between name and description: https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
bxl-forever (2022-10-06 10:03:43+00:00): Hello,

Is that really one single buiding?

Buildings are normally referenced on official UrbIS data, this one isn’t.

On aerial imagery, this looks like a collection of small structures, e.g. greenhouses or prefabricated buildings, as seen during this field survey earlier this year: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1015782669296995
Frans S (2022-10-16 10:37:46+00:00): Hello again. 
See my previous comments. 
Also, these mappings are rather inaccurate mapped.
Please improve your mapping skills
Best  regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126991776
eggie (2022-10-04 15:16:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback >> Zal zo even kijken, want ik zie een vreemde rendering (nog) van het water.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-10-04 15:26:23+00:00): Je hebt er een groot watervlak van gemaakt.. Is dat de bedoeling?

Waarom een multipolygoon water met daarin een vlak water?
Wat is de EcoVredeGaard? 
Een Voedselbos... Dan kun je het beter als voedselbos taggen.
Kijk eens hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgarden

leisure-garden 
Verder zou je de beschrijving hoe er te komen onder description kunnen laten vallen. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-10-04 19:08:20+00:00): Het watervlak heb ik weer omgezet naar orchard... 
Wwellicht kan leisure=garden ook. 
Volgens mij is het hier geen watervlak.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
mavl (2023-04-25 09:08:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:42:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:41:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 11:38:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127566555, 127563965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
snooozer (2022-10-15 17:55:06+00:00): Thanks for fixing my wrong tagging! :-)