piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2021-09-24 07:04:30+00:00): Hi,
Relation 13254274 has shared segments - see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.10590&lat=-34.05149&zoom=18

Note A relation is not required for this building... there is no difference in the tagging. So  a simple single way around the outside will do the job. 

You should fix this so you learn how. First make a simple way around the outside - tag building=yes then delete the old relation and the 3 old ways.

Problems? Leave a message here - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111582956
abakus_uploader (2021-09-23 22:31:02+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
ivanbranco (2021-09-23 16:27:28+00:00): Ciao Marty5550,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986185472
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986185467
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986185468

queste strade non sembrano esistere dalle immagini aeree, ma anche lo fossero non sarebbero certamente driveway. Probabilmente le aggiungi per eliminare le segnalazioni di Osmose ecc. che segnalano che il parcheggio non è raggiunto da nessuna strada. In questi casi basta aggiungere parking=street_side per risolvere il problema.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111583107
jonorossi (2021-10-29 12:36:43+00:00): You might like to revisit the address of 	Red Rooster, unless it really is on a bun :)
Tech Dec (2021-11-04 01:01:56+00:00): Haha thanks Jon. Don't know how I managed to do that. Fixed in changeset #113353840
skyper (2021-10-15 20:33:22+00:00): Hi sbelemey
Despite your CS-comment, you did not remove any relation but left them broken. As this is by far the only case, it looks like that something with your workflow or iD is not working correctly.
Please, recheck you last edits and take with your team. Thanks

Regards skyper
sbelemey (2021-10-18 08:16:27+00:00): Hi skyper!
this error has already been fixed and i checked my last edits.
thank you for your feedback.

Best regards!
skyper (2021-10-18 09:58:29+00:00): Hi sbelemey

Thanks.
JOSM warns me about broken relations. If iD does not, once again please use a better editor software when working with relations. Most concerning, iD broke most of the relations and now you have to dig deep through object history to understand and fix it.

Best regards
sbelemey (2021-10-20 12:44:40+00:00): Hi skyper!
this is a well-known issue for us, so we stopped mapping restrictions until we figure out this technical problem. thanks for mention! 
best regards!
skyper (2021-10-21 12:00:53+00:00): Thanks for the info

I have added another comment on https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=73388

which might be a better place to discuss the problems and the strategy to solve them.
Take care
archpdx (2021-09-28 04:23:50+00:00): Hi,
I noticed the updated website includes a tracking parameter (?utm_source=Google&utm_medium=Maps&utm_campaign=LocalSearch). This is discouraged in the OSM community due to security and privacy concerns. (See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website)

Also it looks like this account is used for organized mapping by Hilton Hotels. I recommend you take a look at the Organized Editing Guidelines (https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines) before you continue mapping.

-archpdx
Hilton Hotels (2021-09-28 06:34:25+00:00): Hi archpdx,

Thank you for pointing this to my attention, rest assured that the tracking parameter has been just removed from the business details.

Best Regards,
Nevena
archpdx (2021-09-28 18:44:53+00:00): Hi again,
It looks like this wasn't the only instance of adding websites with tracking parameters. I've set up a Map Roulette challenge so that anyone can easily find most of these instances (https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/23117). Feel free to use this to help remove the tracking parameters.
Hilton Hotels (2021-09-29 07:55:06+00:00): Hi archpdx,

Thank you for creating the challenge, we will surely participate in the updates and kindly rest assured that no tracking parameter will be added during our future edits.

Best Regards,
Nevena
AndresDuhour (2022-01-18 11:09:48+00:00): Buen día! estoy revisando abreviaturas en nombres de calles en La Pampa y justo vi que habías corregido este nombre recientemente. Tendrás idea si Fel. es una abreviatura? en una publicación en el fb de la municipalidad le llaman Pasaje Fel Martín. Saludos!
DaveF (2021-09-23 12:40:51+00:00): Hi
The Southern end of this must looks like it should be cycleway to link with the cycle road crossing:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/975016505

Even with an adjacent cycleway riding on the road is allowed. Her you tagged it a 'no':
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88284855

Here as 'permissive':
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/88284841
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:53:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:47:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
wkdgs (2021-09-24 13:23:25+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.

Zunächst einmal Danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Der "landuse"-Tag (Ackerfläche) wird normalerweise nicht zur Kennzeichnung von Wegen verwendet. Dieser Weg sollte stattdessen mit "highway=path" und "informal=yes" (Trampelpfad)" beschrieben werden. Für die Zugangsbeschränkung würde man "access=no" setzen. Das hat aber anscheinend schon jemand geändert.

Da die ganzen Tags oft nicht besonders intuitiv sind, kann ich nur das Wiki empfehlen um herauszufinden wofür ein bestimmter Tag verwendet werden sollte. Das Wiki findest du über den "i"-Button neben den Eingabefeldern im ID-Editor oder unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite.

In diesem Fall fände ich es sogar in Ordnung den Weg komplett zu löschen, sodass er auch nicht mehr auf der Karte erscheint. Wenn du möchtest kannst du im deutschen OSM-Forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14) eine Diskussion dazu anstoßen, und fragen, ob man diesen Weg löschen sollte.

LG
winkeldings
ivanbranco (2021-11-09 15:21:48+00:00): Hi Pedja, don't you also think that this tags are repetitive? They represent the same "information".

ref:wdpa=2522 + wdpa:website=https://www.protectedplanet.net/2522

it would be like having, for example
wikidata=Q1258055 + wikidata:website=https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1258055

I would just keep ref:wdpa=*, what you think about it? :)
Pedja (2021-11-10 14:23:27+00:00): For wikidata some software do know how to handle it and show site.

For wdpa it is most certainly not the case. wdpa web site is not regulated so it may follow different scheme or change.
ivanbranco (2021-11-10 16:02:55+00:00): But we don't tag for the renderer: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

If the software doesn't know how to handle the tag it's a software problem, not a tagging one.

As you want anyway, was just a suggestion.
eggie (2021-09-23 12:06:42+00:00): Tip:
Beste  3of4  Probeer svp de paden (fietspad)  los te houden van de landuse. De kaart wordt anders onwerkbaar en bij verschuiven van het één komt het ander mee.
Dus geen paden vastplakken aan de landuse. Vlakken onderling kun je wel verbinden.
MVG
eggie
highflyer74 (2021-11-02 16:41:47+00:00): Hello!

Please do not add random disconnected highway parts that are not even highways. I am referring to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986220084 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986220083.

I am sorry but they will be removed again. All the best to you!
Sandal man (2021-10-03 16:51:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986226711
What is this?
TheSwavu (2021-09-24 02:58:48+00:00): Hi,

I noticed that you've mapped Logan Road so you can't turn right into Baker Street. The Bing aerial imagery appears to be recent enough to show the new intersection lay out and there is a right turn arrow painted on the road.

Did they do some more work after this?

Thanks.
John Sinclair (2021-09-24 11:30:23+00:00): Hi, Thanks for the feedback. I have added the missing turn lanes. Let me know if I've still got it wrong. I'm going to ride that way tomorrow to check it out.
Cheers,
John
osmviborg (2021-09-23 12:53:57+00:00): Hej. Som du selv påpeger, et lokalt navn. Derfor tagget med 'loc_name' lokalt navn.
felipeeugenio (2021-09-23 15:16:41+00:00): Estimado
Borró el parque.
Ya no existe? o fue un error? qué intentó hacer?
saludos
felipeeugenio (2021-09-23 15:19:04+00:00): Veo que lo dejó en dos segmentos separados. Cual es la fuente? saludos
PraPraCL (2021-10-26 19:28:45+00:00): http://bdrnap.mma.gob.cl/recursos/SINIA/PlandeManejo/MN%20Cerro%20%C3%91ielol.pdf
felipeeugenio (2021-10-26 19:34:52+00:00): ok. Ya fue aclarado por alguien en el chat de la comunidad en Telegram. Está invitado a unirse a este link.: https://t.me/OSMcl

Saludos
seewäldler (2021-09-24 12:10:16+00:00): Hallo mcliquid
Dieser öffentliche Bebauungsplan den du da verwendet hast, bist du dir sicher, daß das eine für OSM erlaubte Quelle ist?
mcliquid (2021-09-24 13:20:41+00:00): Hallo seewälder,
im Titel des Bebauungsplans stand der Name des Wohngebiets. Wenn diese Quelle unzulässig ist, lösche ich gerne den Namen des Wohngebiets raus. Viele Grüße
seewäldler (2021-09-24 13:57:03+00:00): Hallo!
Den Namen des Wohngebietes wird es ja hoffentlich auch in Tageszeitungen o.ä. zu lesen gegeben haben, wenn es nur der war. Ansonsten hatte ich https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Grenze/Satzungen gefunden, wonach es mMn nur sehr begrenzt erlaubt ist Daten aus Bebauungsplänen zu übernehmen.
Lee Carré (2021-09-23 12:24:29+00:00): Seeking review especially on opening_hours . Unsure if syntax is (in)valid or if I may have found another editor bug.
grin (2021-10-27 17:51:46+00:00): Azt megkérdezhetem, hogy hogyan állapítottátok meg az utak „helyes” pozícióját? Ugye nem a műhold alapján? (Tudjátok, hogy a műhold képét ismert GPS pozíció alapján kalibrálni kell, mielőtt hozzmértek valamit?)
eggie (2021-09-23 12:51:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback .. Alle begin is moeilijk.. name=Wadi hoort bv niet op de kaart. Daar is de nametag niet voor.
Kijk even hier hoe je dat mapt
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:basin%3Dinfiltration

Dan zal door de rendering duidelijk zijn dat het gebied bestemd is om wateroverlast te voorkomen. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-09-23 13:02:47+00:00): De naam Wadi heb ik even verwijderd.. en als voorbeeld een syukje ingetekend aan de noordkant
Deze tags gebruikt
    landuse=basin and basin=infiltration
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-09-23 13:05:48+00:00): De wettelijke snelheid op een woonerf in Nederland is maxspeed 15  Kijk je daar nog even naar?
JochenB (2022-05-26 23:12:01+00:00): Hi Ingbife

du hast hier an der Landsberger einen Radfahrstreifen als eigene Linie getaggt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/986236346). 

Bei Gehwegen gibt es da sicher Interpretationsspielräume, bei Radfahrstreifen ist das tatsächlich ein Fehler. Die werden immer an die Fahrbahnlinie getaggt mit 'cycleway=lane (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:cycleway%3Dlane) siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:cycleway bzw. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/Radverkehrsanlagen_kartieren. 

Die Linie des Radfahrstreifens habe ich nun wieder rausgenommen und den Weg gegnüber zum Gehweg gemacht. 

Allerdings ist der Gehweg als eigene Linie auch nicht notwendig. Er wurde bereits an der Straße getaggt und ist auch nicht von ihr abgesetzt. Den habe ich mir aber nicht getraut zu löschen.

Viele Grüße,
Jochen
gabro00 (2021-09-23 14:03:20+00:00): Szia!
Szerintem a Telekom székház előtt mind a kerékpárút, mind a járda aszfalt. Google utcaképen idén májusban is aszfalt látszik: https://goo.gl/maps/Etkd3vfqLsp8JW2w8 és nincs is rossz állapotban, így gondolom azóta nem nyúltak hozzá.
008kevin (2021-09-24 13:44:40+00:00): Szia!
Én ügy emlékeztem hogy beton, de ma elmegyek arra és megnézem, köszi hogy szóltál.
gabro00 (2021-09-24 13:55:13+00:00): Rendben, várom a visszajelzést ;)
008kevin (2021-09-24 18:11:53+00:00): Megnéztem és igazad volt, átírjam vagy már megcsináltad?
gabro00 (2021-09-25 06:31:30+00:00): Nem írtam át, a válaszodra vártam. Írd át nyugodtan, szerkesztettem már eleget, te pedig még nem :)
gabro00 (2021-10-01 11:05:56+00:00): Javítottam https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111958306
NeuronBasher (2021-09-23 12:39:56+00:00): I meant Canal Winchester, not Groveport
ivanbranco (2021-09-23 16:20:57+00:00): Ciao Marty5550,

per quanto tu scriva in questo changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110857485 ) che ti sei rotto di commentarli e che per questo torni a Vespucci, ti informo che è possibile commentare i changeset anche con Vespucci.

Questo è un changeset a caso di un utente con la tua stessa versione di Vespucci: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111602382

Quindi ti invito (per l'ennesima volta )a commentare i changeset in modo che anche gli altri utenti possano capire cosa hai modificato. Vedi: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

Come ti invito (per l'ennesima volta) a risponde ai dubbi degli altri mapper nei changeset precedenti: Inoltre per favore rispondi ai commenti nei changeset precedenti:
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10901495
Heinz_V (2021-09-26 19:31:57+00:00): Please read this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only and stop the misuse of the name-tag.
Peter Van Geit (2021-09-27 06:52:27+00:00): Understood Heinz_V. If the name tag is left empty will the hamlets been visible on a standard OSM basemap?
kolasau (2021-09-23 14:02:36+00:00): To be precise, removed the duplicate, this road already has left turn restriction.
Tomas Straupis (2021-09-24 07:24:58+00:00): Darželiai nėra atskira žemėnaudos klasė, tai jų nereikia iškirpti iš residential. Kaip tik yra QA taisyklė, kad visos mokyklos ir darželiai privalo būti residential plote :-)
eggie (2021-09-23 17:54:47+00:00): Aahhh,, vandaar dat ik zoveel 20 zie.
Dat is wel een dingetje van die editor.
In België is het bv wel 20.

Groet
eggie
Woidmadl (2021-09-24 13:33:21+00:00): Hi,
may I ask you, why you deleted tags like brand or website? The fuel station is still part of OMV according to website (https://www.omv.at/de-at/tankstellen) and also signs in front of it say that.

Greetings
Woidmadl
mvw93 (2022-06-02 10:23:49+00:00): Hi,
this was according to OMV group.
Greetings.
Pieter Vander Vennet (2021-09-28 11:54:07+00:00): Hallo MobiliteitHaaltert,

Jullie hebben de Windmolenstraat (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147020437) als 'bike street' gemarkeerd. De correcte aanduiding voor fietsstraten is echter `cyclestreet=yes`. Ik heb het voor jullie aangepast.

Er is trouwens ook deze webapp waar je makkelijk en snel fietsstraten kunt aanduiden in OpenStreetMap:

https://mapcomplete.osm.be/cyclestreets.html?language=en#welcome

En ook de andere themas zijn wellicht interesant om eens te bekijken: https://mapcomplete.osm.be
APneunzehn74 (2022-10-04 16:30:03+00:00): Hello, what kind of transformer is that? power:substation?
Greetings APneunzehn74
mappatman (2022-11-21 18:12:43+00:00): I would say it was something similar to this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File%3A10kV%20trafo%20kiosk.jpg
Vinber-Pro (2021-09-24 16:34:31+00:00): Bonjour Clémence, la ville et le code postal ne sont pas vraiment utiles car cela peut être déduit de la position. Ce n'est pas grave mais cela ne sert pas vraiment.
Curieux de savoir pour quelles raisons tu as souhaité les ajouter ?
A plus
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111598624
starsep (2022-09-11 19:44:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5084362706 is not part of Kołobrzeski Rower Miejski. It's in another city: Kołobrzeg, not in Warsaw. Don't apply iD suggestion blindly.
eggie (2021-09-23 17:59:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Владимир К (2021-12-04 14:00:34+00:00): Добрый день.
Не надо вешать все дефолтные теги доступа на дороги.
2GarinZmei (2021-12-04 14:13:21+00:00): Добрый день! Надо но не все , те которые указаны нужны для роутинга!
Владимир К (2021-12-04 15:10:45+00:00): Для какого такого роутинга? где? на каком движке? те теги которые вы здесь указали - частично либо соответствуют дефолтным значениям(access=yes motor_vehicle=yes), либо неверны, как например bicycle=yes  на дороге, на которой нет ни велодорожки, ни велополсы.  И foot=yes тоже лишний там, где вдоль дорог есть тротуары. я уже всё убрал.
jaap de vries (2021-09-24 08:20:01+00:00): Je geeft aan aan de Banier, fietspad 3x surface tags. 1 tag voor het fietspad is voldoende
jaap de vries (2021-09-24 08:22:17+00:00): Het fietspad, ook in de toekomst, zo taggen:
highway	cycleway
name	Banier
foot	yes
surface	paving_stones
jaap de vries (2021-09-24 08:25:04+00:00): Streetcomplete is leuke app maar is geen fijne editor voor osm gebruik. Als je wil kan je Id of Josm gebruiken
jaap de vries (2021-09-24 08:27:09+00:00): Ik kom veel in jouw gemeente Vijfheerlanden, ik kan je helpen als je hulp nodig hebt.
RolandHUN_Mapper (2021-09-23 15:00:27+00:00): A módosításcsomag helyes neve: Tököl, KFC építési munkálatok.
mueschel (2021-09-24 12:41:01+00:00): Reminder:
please check your edits for spelling mistakes in the keys. I found hundreds of them added in the past days.
Please make sure you check all edits for such spelling mistakes - any error results in data that can't be understood by any software and e.g. can't be displayed on maps.
az09 (2022-01-17 10:44:18+00:00): здравствуйте.
откуда взялись кавычки? и особенно ёлочкой
DaveF (2021-09-24 11:15:54+00:00): Hi
All railway stations are tagged as nodes. Buildings use train_station tag.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/716665179#map=19/51.86662/0.16516
literan (2021-09-23 17:08:45+00:00): а зачем вы остановку утащили на здание?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4119703626/history#map=18/55.73549/37.71146
JeroenHoek (2022-03-13 07:07:42+00:00): Hello,

In Taginfo the tag kerb=lower drew my attention. It looks like this tag-value is used mostly (or only) by you:

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/kerb#values

Could this be a misspelling of kerb=lowered? Are there data consumers that specifically expect kerb=lower?
wireguy (2022-03-13 11:34:22+00:00): Yep, seems like a typo.
JeroenHoek (2022-03-13 13:55:24+00:00): Thanks.

I've documented it as such on the wiki:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb#Possible_tagging_mistakes

You sure mapped a lot of kerbs! Nice.
AndresDuhour (2022-08-03 18:32:53+00:00): Buenas tardes!
Estaba revisando nombres de calle y veo que la futura sede indica calle Buenos Aires que no se encuentra en esta zona. Quería consultarle si ese es el lugar o sería otro, o si se puede confirmar la calle que corresponde. 
Saludos!
Andrés
Tinicles (2022-08-03 20:27:32+00:00): Estimado Andrés, 
Gracias por su comentarios.  La dirección que se publico es la actual, donde puede encontrar la Iglesia. En la ubicación del Mapa es el terreno aún sin edificación. Estimamos que a finales de Agosto/22 o primeros días de septiembre se estarían comenzando la obra, una vez que obtengamos las autorizaciones y permisos de los órganos de control, proceso que esta muy avanzado.
zby-cz (2025-08-07 14:04:11+00:00): Hi, may I ask what should mean author=Josephine on several shops you have mapped? (see https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/29ui)

I wonder if it is a brand or some kind of architect, or perhaps author of the changeset? Thx
Kevo (2022-01-11 02:00:46+00:00): Hey!  Just a heads up when you're adding cycleways - check the corresponding road as chances are the cycleway has already been added through tags, so remove it to avoid duplication.  I've fixed the duplication along Hunter St.

When also add an separate cycleway routing becomes easier to break, so ensure you connect the cycleway with any highways (streets, alleys, parking lots, etc.) that can be turned on to or off of the cycleway (ex: @ Hunter or Springer Sts).

Happy mapping & cheers,
Kevin
do not bring quebec into this (2022-02-09 15:33:07+00:00): thanks! i actually noticed this a couple days before recieving this, but had no idea how to address it properly, so i eneded up doing anything. thank you, this helps me a lot!
Kevo (2022-02-09 15:55:26+00:00): No worries.  It's a bit of a pain because I always need to wonder about all of the little routing possibilities as I go along and end up missing some.
tux67 (2021-09-23 16:11:07+00:00): Hallo Pattex,
die Adresse gibt's bei OSM nur einmal. Ausnahme wäre ein separater POI mit einer eigenen Adresse.

2 Optionen.
- wenn das ganze ein Gebäude ist ließe es sich zusammenfassen
- die Adresse auf einen separaten Node im Gebäude umziehen.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111603820
tux67 (2021-09-23 16:19:30+00:00): Ich sehe gerade - die Adresse war schon als node da - wie in der gesamten Umgebung.
Das ist jetzt wieder entsprechend angepasst.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/111603820
TimeVod (2021-09-24 17:36:51+00:00): All your nefarious data are belong to us.
A67-A67 (2021-09-23 16:32:56+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt de concessienaam (bijv. West-Brabant) van een aantal buslijnen overschreven naar 'Arriva'. Arriva is de vervoerder en hoort in de operator-tag, niet in de network-tag! Graag niet zomaar editor proposals accepteren zonder dat je weet wat je aan het doen bent.
Jorisbo (2021-09-23 18:26:53+00:00): Dag A67, dankjewel, ik zal er op letten. groetjes Joris
user_1566574 (2021-09-30 09:46:10+00:00): Bonjour,
Bien que l'ajout des adresses soit un sujet sensiblement compliqué en France, il n'est pas recommandé de supprimer les points d'adresses pour les placer sur les bâtiments. Au contraire, la tendance tend à s'inverser.
Voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Addresses

Merci à vous !
jleedev (2021-09-23 16:57:49+00:00): Better would be highway=construction, construction=residential.
jrh31990 (2021-09-23 16:59:39+00:00): ok, will adjust this next time.