piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Florida (2022-03-30 07:11:17+00:00): Since ref tag is not visible, and hole# is visible information, I have added hole#. 
If that violates OSM mapping rules, I sure wil take it off. However, I did not find respective information in the link provided. So, I'm a bit confused.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-30 07:14:32+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-30 07:16:53+00:00): As for visibility that falls under https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
Florida (2022-03-30 07:29:11+00:00): Thanks, I will respect it. 
Even so, I beleive the hole# is indeed the name of the hole. Some golf courses name their holes in addidtion with fancy names. Most do not and simply name their holes with numbers. On the score card, the holes are named by the number, too. Otherwise, how can holes be differentiated. However, I'm far from an expert and sure will respect it.
Allison P (2022-03-30 19:27:33+00:00): You answered your own question. They're differentiated with the number.
Florida (2022-03-30 19:47:46+00:00): Ok, they are differentiated with the number. What does that mean now, can I use the name tag and name the holes by their number as it's done in countless mapped courses, or not? Sorry, I'm still confused....
Allison P (2022-03-30 20:14:27+00:00): Having both a ref and name that are the same is useless. Just because others have done something doesn't make it correct. "Hole 18" is not a name.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-30 21:28:24+00:00): I removed most hole numbers from name field in US a few days ago so you shouldn't come across it as much. https://osmcha.org/?filters=%7B%22users%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22Spaghetti%20Monster%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22Spaghetti%20Monster%22%7D%5D%2C%22date__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%22%22%2C%22value%22%3A%22%22%7D%5D%2C%22modify__gte%22%3A%5B%7B%22label%22%3A%225000%22%2C%22value%22%3A%225000%22%7D%5D%7D
Florida (2022-03-31 05:08:14+00:00): Thanks, clear for me now!
user_15436648 (2022-03-29 18:11:06+00:00): May I know what sort of references or data support the elevation of 唐公嶺to be exactly 55m?
HKHikerhang (2022-03-29 18:31:48+00:00): Referred from HKSAR Govt's e-map "香港地質"
Galessandroni (2022-03-31 14:16:19+00:00): errore inserimento addr:housenumber su edificio invece che su nodo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119082822
zte123 (2022-03-31 16:50:08+00:00): Buon pomeriggio  Galessandroni
Ho inserito per errore il civico nell'edificio, ma poi l'ho cancellato e inserito come nodo. Mi potrebbe aiutare per capire se ho fatto l'operazione corretta. Grazie
Galessandroni (2022-03-31 17:29:55+00:00): Sì, l'operazione è corretta (ho appena scritto una mail in privato). Hai fatto un buon lavoro, ma - una cosa che ho dimenticato - assicurati che i civici siano tutti interni agli edifici, e non... per strada. Se ne vedi (anche di altri) correggili pure.
ovruni (2022-03-30 00:59:43+00:00): Hola El_ximo, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en varios de tus conjuntos de cambios se ha agregado el texto " nuevas actualizaciones", sin embargo esto no brinda información suficiente sobre los cambios realizados. Por favor revisa la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0] Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
sheldonelectric (2023-01-22 07:20:00+00:00): 1. Avocado is a spanish word. When in doubt, just use "name" not "name:en".

2. We do not write "vegan options" in the name. (filters won't work). Instead, we tag diet:vegan=yes.

3. If the place is vegan only, the tag would be diet:vegan=only.
Kovoschiz (2022-03-30 04:57:25+00:00): There appears to be 2 summits here.
user_5359 (2022-03-30 16:54:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What is the meaning of the tag testezabbix = teste? Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database.
sheldonelectric (2023-01-22 07:27:22+00:00): here also, diet:vegan=yes
not "vegan option".
You have done this in several restaurants.
Shall I review all your 193 edits or you can do it yourself?
ovruni (2022-03-30 01:52:24+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se han agregado vías de uso industrial ficticias, por lo que las he retirado.
Saludos
4004 (2022-04-02 22:15:39+00:00): опять же, теги для лесных кварталов неправильные, поправьте пожалуйста
user_5359 (2022-03-30 17:39:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/804544943. What is the meaning of the tag Elektrik Yarımstansiya = yes ?
MenKauRa (2022-12-18 18:09:16+00:00): That's my fault...
I'll fix it as soon as possible
Thanks
Tomas Straupis (2022-03-30 04:40:31+00:00): Kažkada diskutavom, nuo kada jau galima dėti cliff, tai sprendimas buvo, kad kai reikia papildomos įrangos užlipimui. Šitą šlaitą nesunkiai bet kas įveiks tiek žemyn, tiek aukštyn :-) Nes jei pažymėsim šitą šlaitą, tai tada vos ne visą neries pakrantę galima cliff žymėti, tiek palei visą Vileišio gatvę, Olimpiečių gatvę ir t.t. Analogiškai tada visus piliakalnius cliff'ais apjuosi ir pan. Lietuvoje cliff būtų visokios atodangos (pvz. Pūčkorių).
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-31 21:52:55+00:00): All area changesets from past few days have been reverted due to tagging issues. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Duniversity
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforest
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
Andre68 (2022-03-29 19:56:43+00:00): Please _never_ leave coastlines uncompleted! And please learn that coastlines are at high tide line! See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Coastline
Because of too much damage I now reverted this changeset. Please be more accurate next time...
user_15397587 (2022-03-30 08:35:40+00:00): Please, since you deleted/concealed somebody else's work correctly done by tracing aerial imagery, I strongly suggest you to declare your sources, otherwise vandalism is yours.
user_15397587 (2022-03-30 08:33:44+00:00): Please, since you deleted/concealed somebody else's work correctly done by tracing aerial imagery, I strongly suggest you to declare your sources, otherwise vandalism is yours.
kevinp2 (2022-04-05 15:45:51+00:00): Construction has been completed on the Port Aransas South Jetty and it is now a good bike path.  Not sure why this was changed to foot path only.
TravGW (2022-04-05 16:00:26+00:00): Tagging a way with highway=cycleway implies that the route is designated for bicycles.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dcycleway

The last time I was here the jetty was covered with fishermen, coolers, shade tents, chairs, and other objects. Based on that I find it unlikely that anyone would want to bike up and down this path. Unless this path is purposely built or signed for bicycle usage it should remain highway=footway. If both pedestrians and cyclists have an equal share of the path, use highway=path.

See also
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dfootway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
kevinp2 (2022-04-13 04:13:45+00:00): This changeset wrongly deleted informal path 1015982988.
kevinp2 (2022-04-13 04:25:56+00:00): This changeset wrongly deleted node 4636413549, which represented a US Army Corps of Engineers survey mark embedded into one end of the concrete path.
user_15397587 (2022-03-30 08:27:02+00:00): Please, since you deleted/concealed somebody else's work correctly done by tracing aerial imagery, I stringly suggest you to declare your sources, otherwise vandalism is yours.
avinet_ua (2022-03-30 20:01:07+00:00): поверни назад, ти не розумієш чому так було зроблено чи прикидаєшся?
user_15397587 (2022-03-30 08:26:45+00:00): Please, since you deleted/concealed somebody else's work correctly done by tracing aerial imagery, I stringly suggest you to declare your sources, otherwise vandalism is yours.
avinet_ua (2022-03-30 20:00:54+00:00): поверни назад, ти не розумієш чому так було зроблено чи прикидаєшся?
militrik (2022-04-07 08:28:51+00:00): він і мої подібні правки відкатив
user_15397587 (2022-03-30 08:26:03+00:00): Please, since you deleted/concealed somebody else's work correctly done by tracing aerial imagery, I stringly suggest you to declare your sources, otherwise vandalism is yours.
avinet_ua (2022-03-30 20:00:44+00:00): поверни назад, ти не розумієш чому так було зроблено чи прикидаєшся?
user_15397587 (2022-03-30 08:25:26+00:00): Please, since you deleted/concealed somebody else's work correctly done by tracing aerial imagery, I stringly suggest you to declare your sources, otherwise vandalism is yours.
avinet_ua (2022-03-30 19:59:26+00:00): поверни назад, ти не розумієш чому так було зроблено чи прикидаєшся?
user_5359 (2022-03-30 16:50:35+00:00): Hello (again)! please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046290697. What is the meaning of the tag CCT = 15DJN1902E? See also  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118073781

Hola (de nuevo)! Por favor, eche un vistazo en http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046290697. ¿Qué significa la etiqueta CCT = 15DJN1902E? Véase también https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118073781
4004 (2022-04-23 22:00:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3139080
user_5359 (2022-03-30 05:25:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Is there any good reason to delete the key building:levels? Are the wrong?
Jonathon Of The Creators of all creators! (2022-04-05 02:54:13+00:00): Yes! The levels are just an estimate grrr!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-04-25 15:00:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120169497 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for deleting and editing buildings without prior contact with the original mappers
Jonathon Of The Creators of all creators! (2022-11-30 02:41:12+00:00): ok i am extremely sorry for changing this joes level of buildings deleting them i am sorry pls forgive 😭😭😭😭
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-04-25 15:00:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120169497 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert for deleting and editing buildings without prior contact with the original mappers
Jonathon Of The Creators of all creators! (2022-11-30 02:41:41+00:00): ok i am extremely sorry for changing this joes level of buildings deleting them i am sorry pls forgive 😭😭😭😭
Amr@Gis (2022-03-31 09:27:14+00:00): Hello noodlemommy;
I noticed you added some service ways that overlapped and added nodes without any tags, also service way did not snap with another way, I think that happened by conflict with the "albahabla" changeset.
That's the link changeset conflict that happened with your changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119085740
Could you check this area and fix this issue?
Examples of the issues that need to fix:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9622018650
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9622018625
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046302058
Regards
Amr@Gis
noodlemommy (2022-03-31 15:25:01+00:00): Hi Amr@Gis,
Thank you for letting me know about this issue. You are correct, it was caused by a conflict. I corrected the area.
Thank you,
noodlemommy
VA00 (2022-04-07 10:45:07+00:00): Jeżeli droga jest prywatna to należy dodać access=private, a nie name=drga prywatna. Dawno tam nie byłem, czy faktycznie jest przejazd rowerem? Kiedyś był drut w poprzek
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-31 21:51:32+00:00): All area changesets from past few days have been reverted due to tagging issues. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Duniversity
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforest
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
luin132 (2022-03-29 19:50:26+00:00): I adjusted and extended service roads.
Allison P (2022-04-15 09:11:09+00:00): All of these building footprints are extremely low quality and have the incorrect name "private residence". Please fix them, or I will delete them.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-31 18:18:13+00:00): Private residence is not a name
SomeoneElse (2022-08-30 16:36:52+00:00): Long Marston not Lofthouse
Welshie (2022-08-30 16:55:11+00:00): you are correct. I have edited this STW name and ref
ovruni (2022-03-30 01:57:51+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiado un segmento de una gran vía dejando un desnivel recto, por favor evitar esto. Voy a revertir este conjunto de cambios.
GeralMuZa (2022-03-30 17:43:28+00:00): Entendido, no tenía conocimiento de ese desnivel. Gracias por revertirlo.
SomeoneElse (2022-08-30 16:36:07+00:00): Ryther not Ruston Parva
Welshie (2022-08-30 16:53:22+00:00): you are correct. I have edited the name and ref of the STW. Thank you for cross-checking these.
pyrog (2022-03-31 16:41:19+00:00): Re bonjour,

Pour un sentier il faut utiliser highway=path

(footway c'est pour un chemin revêtu)

Pas besoin de mettre wheelchair=no

ni foot=yes, bicycle=yes, dog=yes, horse=yes.

ce sont les valeurs par défaut.

horse=yes ou no ce met uniquement si il y a un panneau qui oblige ou interdit le passage aux chevaux.

Idem pour les chiens, les vélos…

Yves

Il s'agit du chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046332350
SomeoneElse (2022-08-30 16:35:26+00:00): Kelfield not Keld
SomeoneElse (2022-08-30 16:52:44+00:00): I've found https://www.yorkshirewater.com/media/sxnfahsl/market-information-publication.xlsx and that lists this as Kelfield, not Keld.
Maybe check the other Yorkshire ones at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lut ?
Volodymyr D-k (2022-04-07 18:00:46+00:00): Привіт,
сьогодні побачив це в Біляївці - ти перейменував лише одну частину Московської вулиці, а решту залишив без змін. До того не змінив прив'язки до вулиці будинків, які на ній стоять. 
Я це виправив https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119436409 і ще одним редагуванням, але бачу, що проблема ширша - тут так само перейменована частина вулиці і не переприв'язані будинки ((
Дякую за те, що робиш, але прошу - доробляй до кінця ))
vmanulik (2022-04-07 18:02:50+00:00): Привіт! Дякую! Та на радостях, щось не думалось :(
Volodymyr D-k (2022-04-07 18:09:40+00:00): Значно радісніше змінити назву двох кілометрів вулиці в Миколаєві, аніж її частини на 300 метрів ;)
Приємних редагувань!
vmanulik (2022-04-07 18:20:43+00:00): Хех, так) І вам!
rab (2022-03-29 21:33:55+00:00): click on background settings and choose maxar
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-31 21:50:58+00:00): All area changesets from past few days have been reverted due to tagging issues. Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Duniversity
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Land_use
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dforest
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
SomeoneElse (2022-08-30 16:34:42+00:00): Wistow not Whitley
Welshie (2022-08-30 16:50:51+00:00): You are correct. I've edited the name and ref.
Herrieman (2022-03-29 21:06:49+00:00): Excuus voor de grote changeset box. Had per ongeluk nog een bewerking in Hoofddorp open staan...
Kelerei (2022-03-29 22:24:36+00:00): Sorry mate, but you've jumped the gun on this one a bit: the road is officially opened as of now, but only opens to traffic in the early hours of tomorrow.  I'm reverting this change, as we really don't want routers routing people over this road until it's actually open for traffic!
CodyNZL (2022-03-29 23:25:10+00:00): No problem, that's why I ticked it's for review :)
Kelerei (2022-03-30 08:38:32+00:00): I've just put your changes back now, by the way -- all in time for when traffic hits the road in morning peak tomorrow.  :)
ovruni (2022-03-30 02:04:52+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han agregando enlaces de vías secundarias ficticias, por lo que voy a revertir este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
marczoutendijk (2022-04-01 10:46:22+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments!
Read this again:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5769
hauke-stieler (2022-03-30 20:49:47+00:00): Hi,

kleine Anmerkung zu deinen Änderungen: Es ist immer eine gute Idee abgerissene Gebäude nicht aus OSM zu löschen. Meistens sind Luftbilder immer so ein/zwei Jahre hinterher und Leute zeichnen solche Dinge gerne wieder ein. Besser ist es die lifecycle-Präfixe zu nehmen. Bei abgerissenen Gebäuden also z.B. "demolished:builsing=yes". Dann ist a) klar, dass es abgerissen wurde und b) sehen andere, dass das bewusst nicht auf der Karte erscheint.

Hab das Gebäude und die Zufahrt wiederhergestellt und entsprechend getaggt, der Rest sieht aber gut aus.

Trotzdem natürlich danke für deiner Änderungen und viele Grüße,
Hauke
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-29 23:57:54+00:00): Hole number shouldn't be in the name
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-01 19:21:17+00:00): Lines that are part of a relation should not be tagged the same as the relation
EnumMapper (2022-04-01 21:05:14+00:00): Yes, it was a mistake. It's already fixed  by others
wireguy (2022-04-15 14:08:41+00:00): Can you look at the relation again, seems to still have extra members
Andrea Musuruane (2022-03-30 08:34:06+00:00): E' sempre bello vedere che uno usa un drone per inserire una nuova rotonda e aggiornare tutto quando c'è attorno e poi qualcuno senza alcuna conoscenza dei luoghi ripristina le modifiche guardando ortofoto non più attuali.
ovruni (2022-03-30 02:11:26+00:00): Hola Jhon Casas Camayo, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en sus conjuntos de cambios no se han agregado comentarios que permitan que otros miembros puedan entender los cambios realizados. Por favor revise la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
BCNorwich (2022-03-30 08:11:52+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've amended the paths tags to show definitive public use, removing the access=no tag. The access=no tag indicates that there is no vehicular access at all, which isn't exactly right. I sectioned the public right of way up so the different accesses can be shown, foot only and agricultural vehicles. I've also added some hedges to show where the path runs.

Please don't let this amendment put you off mapping, there's just a lot to learn.
Regards Bernard.
ovruni (2022-03-30 02:11:53+00:00): Hola PIERINA NAYIBEL MARIN RAMIREZ, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en sus conjuntos de cambios no se han agregado comentarios que permitan que otros miembros puedan entender los cambios realizados. Por favor revise la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
MxxCon (2022-03-29 22:51:17+00:00): Hello.
Regarding ps140, generally address tags go on the building, not school grounds...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119089979
mbeyerle (2022-03-30 01:48:17+00:00): Could you please link me to a source on that best practice?
MxxCon (2022-03-30 01:57:32+00:00): There's https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool#How_to_map

It doesn't explicitly mention the addr: tag, however if you think about this logically, school grounds can encompass multiple buildings with separate addresses. Putting address into school ground area would prevent you from accurately representing addresses.
A more extremely example would be NYU with buildings and campuses all over the city. You wouldn't tag the whole campus with a single address...
mbeyerle (2022-03-30 02:39:55+00:00): I certainly want to most accurately reflect what is on the ground and agree it's a bit unclear as to the best way to map this. My interpretation of the wiki is, for instances with one building atop a single contiguous school ground, it's best to place address tags on the amenity=school separate from the school building. In fact, the talk page of the article you linked suggests that tagging scheme. 

In what way does putting addr:* tags on the school ground prevent one from accurately representing addresses?
MxxCon (2022-03-30 05:51:24+00:00): For one, if I were to search for such an address, getting a building as a result is more useful than a whole area including playgrounds and sport fields and parking lots and whatever else might be included.

I don't have first hand experience with this, but I'd imagine that for data consumers it's easier to have one schema of encoding address of schools rather than implementing every possible variation one could come across.

Also I could be misremembering, but I think there are some validators that complain about "address inside of address" check, ie area has an address and there's a node or building with same/different address inside of that area.
mbeyerle (2023-11-27 00:26:48+00:00): I've moved addr tags to the school building in changeset 144488966. Thanks for calling this to my attention and the helpful dialogue!
ovruni (2022-03-30 02:10:24+00:00): Hola Luiggi Piero López, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en sus conjuntos de cambios no se han agregado comentarios que permitan que otros miembros puedan entender los cambios realizados. Por favor revise la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
Mordechai23 (2022-04-09 11:38:35+00:00): To nie było tagowanie pod render. Ta ulica to deptak. Poza tym usunąłeś przy okazji surface bez zastanowienia
Rogoyski (2022-04-09 14:11:25+00:00): To było tagowanie pod render. To, że chodnik jest z lepszego materiału, nie czyni z niego deptaku. Deptak to jest ULICA piesza. highway=pedestrian powinno być w miejscu, gdzie normalnie masz jezdnię, highway=residential itp. Krakowskie Przedmieście ze względu na ruch autobusów się a to nie kwalifikuję. Natomiast robienie highway=pedestrian OBOK highway=residential, będącego jezdnią tej samej ulicy, to zdecydowanie błąd.
Rogoyski (2022-04-09 14:12:56+00:00): I nie widzę, gdzie tu zmieniłem surface: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119090181/
Mordechai23 (2022-04-09 15:46:50+00:00): "I nie widzę, gdzie tu zmieniłem surface: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119090181/"

sory popatrzyłem na inny chodnik którego nie ruszałeś, mój błąd

Nie widzę powodu, by obecność jezdni czy ruchu autobusowego na ulicy dyskwalifikowała użycie highway=pedestrian+area=yes obok jezdni, kiedy spełnione są inna istotne czynniki. 

Istotne jest że to obszar zdominowany przez transport pieszy który może się poruszać swobodnie w wielu kierunkach, nie tylko na długość, w odróżnieniu od zwykłego chodnika, który tak tagowany byc nie powinien.

Patrz na podobne ulice na OSM, na których są jezdnie samochodowe i podłużne place piesze:

1. Paryż https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6759865#map=18/48.87151/2.30300
2. Berlin https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9187708#map=16/52.5170/13.3888
3. Poznań (choć tu jest też dużo niepoprawnie otagowanych chodników) https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/520965989#map=19/52.40704/16.92322
4. Praga https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3366641#map=17/50.08101/14.43086
...I mógłbym wymieniać dalej. KP to analogiczny casus. 

Wiki na ten temat:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Squares_and_plazas