piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-12-24 23:38:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:22:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:16:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:36:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Geofreund1 (2018-10-12 20:03:34+00:00): Du hast sehr fleißig Adressen in Schopfheim eingetragen. Leider sollten diese Adressen alle addr:city=Friesenheim haben, Schopfheim ist optional mit addr:suburb=Schopfheim einzutragen.
Geofreund1 (2018-10-12 20:08:24+00:00): natürlich nicht Schopfheim sondern Oberschopfheim...
brudern (2018-10-14 20:10:31+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis.
Wäre hier auch addr:village statt addr:suburb möglich?
Geofreund1 (2018-10-15 07:32:17+00:00): addr:village kenne ich nicht. Infos zum Thema bekommst du unter
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:addr
addr:suburb verwendet man eigentlich auch nur dann, wenn es Doppeldeutigkeiten innerhalb einer Gemeinde gibt: Wiki:"If an address exists several times in a city."
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:18:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:18:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
olo81 (2024-08-13 22:43:39+00:00): Pięknie, dodawanie dróg, których nie ma :/
C2oc4 (2025-04-05 06:10:21+00:00): Drogi na dzień dodwania były drogami leśnymi
olo81 (2025-04-05 14:02:28+00:00): Dodałeś drogę dla pieszych której nie ma, otagowałeś ją jako pieszą a teraz piszesz że była to droga leśna? Leśnej też tam nie ma.
C2oc4 (2025-05-26 09:59:28+00:00): Te brazowe drogi leśne są
olo81 (2025-05-26 10:37:32+00:00): już dawno temu to czego nie było wywaliłem
C2oc4 (2025-06-04 06:02:16+00:00): ok dzięki
mavl (2018-12-25 00:27:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:23:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:37:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:37:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:54:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:23:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:44:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-07 11:34:03+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63270937

see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63270937
Robert46798 (2018-10-08 07:21:17+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
also wenn ich iD öffne ist das Gebäude da. Aber auf das Gebäude sollte es auch nur eingetragen werden, wenn sonst gar nichts weiter in dem Gebäude ist. Schau mal ob folgendes Tag zur Beschreibung passt. Dann könntest du es noch eintragen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre

Die Informationen wie z. B. die Homepage kannst du unter anderem mit diesem Schema ergänzen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact

Viele Grüße,
Robert
mavl (2018-12-25 00:02:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Kucherenko_PA (2018-10-07 06:41:34+00:00): Левобережная
TagaSanPedroAko (2019-05-24 01:42:07+00:00): Reverted as fantasy edits
ForstEK (2018-11-19 09:03:20+00:00): Hi, gilesgao! Please verify this road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631472617 - you write as source bing imagery, but on bing imagery this road can't seen. On DigitalGlobe Premium imagery an industrial landuse is here. Is this road exist in fact?
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-07 11:33:13+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63271669#map=17/22.16225/91.99596

see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63271669
JJIglesias (2018-10-08 02:15:57+00:00): El SEGIP es un Organo dependiente del Gobierno Nacional (Ministerio de Gobierno) NO ES UNA VENTA DE VEHICULOS. Antes de editar favor leer los tutoriales correspondientes, y verificar bien antes de cometer errores indeseables.
Gracias

http://learnosm.org/es/
Odalys Monroy (2018-10-22 05:34:52+00:00): Lo sé, pero yo lo había editado en la esquina entre la Av. Arequipa y Costanera. Evidentemente el SEGIP cumple esa función, pero ya no se encuentra en esa ubicación a día de hoy, se mudaron y actualmente una tienda de vehículos de segunda mano cuyo nombre es "Autos y estilo". Saludos.
Omnific (2018-10-08 07:13:09+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit but this is not accurate at all. Not only is it not based on any real boundaries, much of downtown is commercial and retail landuse, not residential. Furthermore, there is also a significant amount of correct landuse in downtown Seattle. Please remove this change. Thanks.
dudka (2018-10-07 13:19:41+00:00): уточніть будь ласка що це за памятник, кому він встановлений і чому ви назвали його Альоша
mueschel (2018-10-09 10:51:16+00:00): Something went wrong with this import of trees. 305 have very strange tags like the ones below.
The changeset is also missing the correct source of the import and a link to the documentation of this import.

    Baeume_T_1=1138
    Baeume_T_2=Troisdorf Waldfriedhof
    Baeume_T_3=Friedhof
    Baeume_T_6=19
    Baeume_Tro=4105
    Baumart=Tsuga canadensis, Kanadische Hemlocktanne
    KronenD=900
    OSKA=800/6511P
    ObjektArt=Baum
    ObjektName=20-36073-25-510-1138
    StammUmf=141
    UID=U02CUK5
    Vitalitaet=1
Der Troisdorfer (2018-10-09 11:50:20+00:00): Mein Englisch ist zu miserabel, um die Meldung im ganzen zu verstehen. Der "source of the import" ist - wie angegeben - das Städt. Baumkataster (von der Stadtverwaltung Troisdorf mir zur Verfügung gestellt).
Der Troisdorfer
mueschel (2018-10-09 12:18:26+00:00): Der Changeset hat nur 2 Tags, das Kataster ist nicht als Quelle angegeben:
created_by = JOSM/1.5 (14289 de)
source = Esri World Imagery

Üblicherweise werden Nutzungsgenehmigungen auch im wiki hinterlegt, damit andere die rechtliche Lage nachvollziehen können.

Und es gibt 300 Bäume mit den oben aufgeführten Tags, und ohne die üblichen OSM-Tags wie natural=tree - da musst du noch nacharbeiten.
GinaroZ (2018-10-08 14:22:26+00:00): Trying to work out what you changed here?
BCNorwich (2018-10-08 14:45:45+00:00): Hi, it was actually removing a self intersection of Way: Waverley Bridge (377738788) and Way: Edinburgh Waverley (5208866), the self intersection lain on top of each other. 
I reverted the first changeset to see what was done then removed the intersections again.

Regards Bernard
Nutchanon Wetchasit (2019-04-27 09:09:40+00:00): This edit is now entirely reverted via changeset 69633902 <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69633902>.

See discussions on changeset <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62658038> (twelfth comment) if you need further explanation.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
eggie (2018-10-07 08:38:12+00:00): Dag Ellen.. Je tandartspraktijk ligt nu midden op de Singel. Svp geen adressen aanmaken in OSM, maar maak gebruik van de reeds aanwezige adresnodes.
Ik pas wat aan.
Richard L (2018-10-07 08:40:17+00:00): Something wrong with the edit comments. Comments were for previous edit. Probably some bug with beta version of JOSM. Seemed to have been fixed when updating.
frosm (2018-10-31 01:17:20+00:00): bonjour,
en important le cadastre, n'oubliez pas de tenir compte des objets existant
par exemple se bassin se trouve maintenant en double https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1853346244
même si c'est évidement beaucoup mieux d'avoir dessiné sa surface comparé à un simple nœud :)
Hjart (2018-10-07 09:17:39+00:00): Hej og velkommen til vores projekt.
Jeg tror dog lige jeg vil tillade mig at rulle dine ændringer tilbage
Hjart (2018-10-07 09:39:01+00:00): Ok. Jeg har nu rullet dine ændringer tilbage og i stedet lavet en simpel polygon omkring de relevante bygninger, hvilket ofte er den bedste løsning.
Alecs01 (2018-10-07 13:04:50+00:00): Reverted http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63273395
apm-wa (2018-10-07 12:06:51+00:00): +992938889898
majkaz (2018-10-08 08:01:29+00:00): Ahoj, 
prosím Tě, nelep ta parkoviště k silnicím. Jednak to extrémně ztěžuje další editace těch přilepených objektů, a navíc je to špatně. Silnice je, resp. má být vedená prostředkem, a to parkoviště (plocha) má končit na jeho fyzické hranici - tj. když už, tak na krajnici silnice, resp. její hraně. To parkoviště jednoznačně není ke středové čáře/prostředku silnice.
A zrovna na máji okolo veterinární ordinace by se hodilo si zapnout i katastrální mapu, protože z toho je pozice vidět naprosto přesně. Navíc většina z toho podle mě není amenity:parking ve smyslu velké parkoviště, ale jen "parking:lane", viz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Dopravn%C3%AD_zna%C4%8Dky_v_%C4%8Cesku
mueschel (2018-10-09 10:53:10+00:00): Hi,
you uploaded 5300 ways with strange tags like 

LAYER=Unknown Line Type
TASK=12

Could you have a look and remove all of these?

Thanks,
Jan
Yockie Taupan Putra (2018-10-12 08:42:47+00:00): ok thank you,
Tomas Straupis (2018-10-08 05:58:46+00:00): Nereikia landuse=residential kurti bendrų taškų su keliais ir keisti highway=tertiary klasifikacijos į landuse=residential. Atstačiau.
Prieš darant esamo žymėjimo pakeitimą visada geriau iš pradžių paklausti :-)
Tomas Straupis (2018-10-08 06:00:59+00:00): Apie kelių klasifikaciją yra parašyta čia: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lt:WikiProject_Lithuania
Tomas Straupis (2018-10-08 06:06:57+00:00): Taip pat atstačiau (kiek radau) perklasifikavimų iš unclassified į residential. Unclassified yra aukštesnė klasifikacija pravažiuojamiems keliams. Residential NĖRA skirta visiems keliams, kurie yra gyvenamojoje zonoje. Residential net gali būti visai ne gyvenamosios zonos, o pvz. pramoninės zonos keliuose.
chnav (2018-10-11 11:43:16+00:00): Зачем дорога в Рудном прилеплена к парковке ? Откачено.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:48:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:49:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pio2_122 (2018-10-07 09:41:48+00:00): Przegapiłeś pewien błąd :)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627633647

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/627633642/
mavl (2018-12-25 00:47:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-07 11:32:34+00:00): partly reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63274198

see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63274198
Shaan taisir (2019-01-21 08:38:07+00:00): Hey @pitscheplatsch
I can see my mistakes here. This draw was from my learning period and was just a newbie.. By that time i didn't know
much about this Openstreetmap and community Itself. I would say i was just relaxed and got carried away. However
what i did here it won't happen again i can say. I will be more careful and ethical about my drawings. I have been
already instructed about my mistakes. And i am sorry for my late reply i didn't notice about this changest message.
Thanks for your comments and patient.
Kiekin (2018-11-15 06:09:21+00:00): Klosterbuchstraße getrennt und mit Bindestrichen? Woher hast du die Erkenntnis? Offizielle Schreibweise: Klosterbuchstraße
lutz (2018-11-15 21:27:25+00:00): Es war ein Note-Hinweis, das es mit Bindestrich geschrieben wird.
flohoff (2018-10-08 19:03:18+00:00): Hi,
in diesem weg hast du reichlich access tags gesetzt. Auch im ursprung überlappende.

access=yes/motor_vehicle=no z.b.

Da auf dem path erstmal fast nichts erlaubt ist würde ich die beiden streichen.

Hier sind die defaults aufgeschrieben:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions

Nach den defaults bräuchtest du auf dem path gar nichts setzen an access tags ;)

Flo
flohoff (2018-10-08 19:00:11+00:00): Moin,
ich kannte das glass_bottles gar nicht und habe seit jahren immer recycling:glass gesetzt. Und so richtig find ich die begrenzung auch nicht. Ein Trinkglass als beispiel aus der wikiseite würde ich da ja auch reinwerfen !??

Hmmm

Flo
Basstoelpel (2018-11-13 23:14:38+00:00): Das Umtaggen bedeutet ja nicht, daß ich diese Bedeutungsverschiebung gut fände. Steht nun mal so seit mehreren Jahren im Wiki und es ist meiner Meinung zu spät zu fordern, daß das tagging dem üblichen Sprachgebrauch folgt.

Gruß,

Baßtölpel
Ryzen (2018-10-08 09:13:26+00:00): Please don't always use "Edit" as changeset comment. Tell us what you've really changed!
GerdP (2018-10-08 08:34:43+00:00): Hi! 
I think the way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/406262475
should be removed. If it describes a (hiking) route please create a corresponding relation.
peternik99 (2018-10-08 08:40:44+00:00): I agree. But I am not the original author. It had the tag highway=track which polluted renderered maps.
GerdP (2018-10-08 08:45:13+00:00): That is understodd. I hoped you are a local and know what that way means.
peternik99 (2018-10-08 08:47:31+00:00): Yes I am. It does not constitute any known hiking route.
GerdP (2018-10-08 08:57:45+00:00): OK. There are now a few places where a road is missing, e.g. near these nodes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3097121574
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4315803968
I think you should fix that and finally remove the wrong way.
peternik99 (2018-10-08 09:00:00+00:00): OK. Sure
kuhni74 (2023-01-25 13:22:57+00:00): Woher kommt die Info mit der Hauskapelle https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5963893313 in der Maurer Lange Gasse? Ist sie öffentlich zugänglich? Ich vermute, nein. Im Internet finde ich dazu nichts.
kuhni74 (2023-01-25 13:42:33+00:00): soeben wurde mir von einem Lokalkenner gesagt, dass die Hauskapelle in Wirklichkeit auf Nr.36 ist (ehem. Sommerkloster der Mechitaristen)
kuhni74 (2023-01-25 13:43:14+00:00): hier ein veralteter Adressbucheintrag https://wien.stadtbranchenbuch.at/435193.html
Girolamo (2023-01-25 17:20:40+00:00): Schon lange her. Bin mir nicht mehr ganz sicher. Glaube habe beim Vorbeigehen bemerkt und danach gemappt. Bin für exaktere Daten immer dankbar!
kuhni74 (2023-01-25 19:09:45+00:00): Danke, hab's verschoben (man sieht das Kreuz am First auf google street view)
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-07 11:31:07+00:00): partly reverted by https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63275686

see https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=63275686
KitonZenobia (2018-10-08 09:45:13+00:00): And why?
pitscheplatsch (2018-10-08 17:27:10+00:00): You should better ask this question @ the mentioned changeset here --> https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63275686
gabro00 (2018-10-07 10:56:17+00:00): *Fonógyári
Taya_S (2024-02-17 16:43:46+00:00): Hello,

Hello, I have a question regarding this bit of coastline:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/631585296

I'm currently working on mapping this area, and I was wondering if you know why the coastline is drawn so far land inwards here. Currently it seems to end at some sort of dam. Do you believe it should be drawn like this? 

Sincerely,
Taya
Ewen Hill (2024-02-17 23:00:53+00:00): Hi Taya, You are doing fantastic work in this area. I think this would be best at the mouth of the inlet where the ne sand bar extends so removing all the mangrove creeks. If we mapped every creek, tidal inlet etc. that would be one huge polygon
Taya_S (2024-02-18 09:30:32+00:00): Hello Ewen, 

Thank you. I've been very busy here for the past 2 months. 

I'm not sure if I agree with that stance though. The areas landwards of the sandbar are pretty clearly tide dominated. So the coastline probably should not be at the mouth, but a bit further landwards.

If you're talking about mapping tidal creeks in general, then the coastline should be placed at the MHWL. 
Which for purely tidal creeks means that they should be entirely outside of the coastline.

If this is a technical limitation with regards to MP size and complexity, then I can understand. But as far as I'm aware, the Mainland Australia relation while large is not running in to any such issues. 

Sincerely,
Taya
Ewen Hill (2024-02-18 11:42:45+00:00): Hi Taya - you are absolutely correct after re-reading the OSM wiki on coastlines so apologies for my mis-direction however how do you calculate where the MHWL is in this environment and expect it to be consistently applied. I don't think we have any available waivered datasets that are available to use and that may be up to date. Good luck and apols again