piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
yaugenka (2017-10-02 17:02:27+00:00): It is  not possible to identify settlement boundary if there is no "place" tag in it. So it is very wrong to delete this tag.
gileri (2017-07-02 21:52:18+00:00): Bonjour,

Les données sur le site en source ne semblent pas compatible ODbl, contrairement au jeu de données opendata :

https://data.grandlyon.com/equipements/station-vflov/
DemoLogin (2018-11-13 16:30:04+00:00): Здравствуйте,
Не используйте аббревиатуры в названиях
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.A1.D0.BE.D0.BA.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.89.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B8_.D0.B0.D0.B1.D0.B1.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.B2.D0.B8.D0.B0.D1.82.D1.83.D1.80.D1.8B_.28.D0.BD.D0.B5_.D0.B8.D1.81.D0.BF.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.B7.D1.83.D0.B9.D1.82.D0.B5_.D0.B8.D1.85.29
literan (2018-11-13 17:36:37+00:00): добрый день. Да я бы рад (и никогда не использую, а приведенный вами текст отчасти сам писал ;-)), но я не знаю, как это расшифровывается. А сведения - из заметок.
DemoLogin (2018-11-13 17:45:56+00:00): Ой. Извините, не обратил внимание на комментарий.
nammala (2017-09-08 12:30:48+00:00): Hi Dr Kludge,

Can you please confirm the construction way which you have added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/521219343/history#map=18/33.29132/-112.00599.
Because I am seeing the long stretch of `East Pecos Road` being deleted . Could you please confirm the edits and if it is by mistake can you please go ahead and add the highway .

Best Regards,
nammala
Dr Kludge (2017-09-19 05:27:36+00:00): nammala,  Thank you for your concern.  The remainin part of Pecos Road is a temporary road while they build the north side of the freeway.  I carefully removed the sections per survey.  Please see the mapillary traces.  The problem is that another mapper added the the road back even though it does not exist.
Dr Kludge (2017-09-19 05:42:25+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=33.29105019106838&lng=-112.014240548119&z=17&pKey=ogos6229FZ1qPblOJARPuQ
The images are old now.  There has been a great deal of activity since then.  I have not been able to get back down to that area to perform new surveys.
nammala (2017-09-19 05:43:09+00:00): Thanks Dr Kludge for getting back so the road is under construction right? could you please confirm the area once with your local knowlegde
Dr Kludge (2017-09-19 05:49:49+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=33.29108363486205&lng=-112.09703656855231&z=17&pKey=73R652Wyr0TG5yjHZyPdxQ
jnaven has some 9/12/2017 Mapillary traces.
Dr Kludge (2017-09-19 05:50:51+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=33.29103866595153&lng=-112.09639820280677&z=17&pKey=twvt-zP1XJ8bBhHRdc_NwA
nammala (2017-09-20 05:57:48+00:00): Thanks Dr Kludge for getting back
scruss (2017-07-02 17:45:50+00:00): Hi - thanks for your contributions to OSM!

Could you perhaps be a little more descriptive in your changeset comments? "added house" doesn't tell us much in a changeset spanning half the world. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments for guidance.
manoharuss (2017-07-03 06:24:35+00:00): Hi Mayra Zenteno,


Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. If you would like to learn more on the tagging schema and mapping practices on OpenStreetMap, I suggest going through learnosm.org/en.

Happy Mapping!

Thanks,

Manohar
Pavlo K (2017-08-16 21:30:51+00:00): Де НОРМАЛЬНІ пояснення до змін? Одного слова "Lviv" НЕ достатньо для пояснення причини відкату деталізацї розв'язки. Зокрема заборони розвороту в точках перехрещення?
Pavlo K (2017-08-17 18:17:53+00:00): Ok.. second attempt.. now in English. So where is NORMAL explanation for changes made? A single word "Lviv" is NOT enough to explain reason of reverting interchange details. Specifically prohibition of nodes turnarounds.
Cascafico (2017-07-05 09:27:38+00:00): Ciao e banvenuto in OSM!

...forse place=city è un po' troppo.

Quando hai dubbi, fai riferimento ad altri elementi di OSM. Per esempio nel nord est le city sono queste:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/qc9
jeslop (2017-07-13 08:44:36+00:00): I have reverse your changes due to an error on the use of the name:en tag. This tag is for place (or city or shop or hostels) names not for comments about it. Thanks.
eggie (2017-07-02 18:30:30+00:00): Probeer iets in één keer af te maken.. Hier lopen op busroutes... Ik kijk zo even.
eggie (2017-07-02 18:48:04+00:00): 'k Zie dat het al maanden openlag.. ook in osm..
Is de weg al opengesteld? Wanneer je er niet uitkomt vraag even hulp van een ervaren mapper. Dat kan ook via het forum van osm.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
Zelfde inlog als osm
eggie (2017-07-02 19:22:16+00:00): via PB contact gehad.
woodpeck_repair (2017-09-05 22:18:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 51764077, 51763240 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mass removal of 'oneway=yes' on roundabouts performed by user Grauer after seeing this flagged on Osmose; after complaints from the Dutch community the user asked DWG to help with revert.
chillly (2017-07-02 19:36:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM.
Thanks for trying to add the detail. The item has already been mapped with a lot of detail. It has been added to the building outline. Maps.Me, sadly, only allows you to add details to a point, which is rather simplistic. You might like to look at the online editor to be able to add a more sophisticated edit.

Your edit now doubles up the attraction, so I will remove it. Sorry about this, but we only want one entry for each real-world object.
eggie (2017-07-03 07:14:28+00:00): name:nl  kan er af. Dat wordt alleen in de provincie Friesland toegepast.
GerdP (2017-08-27 08:31:28+00:00): please review highway=unclassified; tertiary
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/144003908
highflyer74 (2017-07-21 14:54:00+00:00): Hello!

Please be advised that landuse=farm is no longer recommended to be used. Please use =farmland or =farmyard accordingly. See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarm.

Thank you!
nammala (2017-07-03 07:40:26+00:00): Hi john,

Can you confirm the source of adding the highways , which seems in zig-zag pattern .

Regards,
nammala
Alecs01 (2018-01-04 14:44:02+00:00): All personal POI, reverted
Alan (2019-11-15 23:45:42+00:00): This changeset incorrectly added a `dam` tag to a feature that should be `waterway=riverbank`
chillly (2017-07-02 20:29:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

It looks as though the entrance might be a bit closer to Coleford. Rather than adding a point, it would be better to draw the road, perhaps tagged as highway:construction while it is being built. If you use the DigitalGlobal standard imagery in the editor (newer than the default one) you can see the early development which might help. Have a go, ask for help here if you get stuck.
motobylette (2018-03-26 21:28:25+00:00): Bonjour, je pars à Séville en moto en avril, mon GPS me dit que la route SE 40 est ouverte entre A 4 et A 49, mais sur la carte osm cette route est en travaux. Cette route est elle déjà ouverte svp, merci
motobylette (2018-03-26 21:30:42+00:00): Hola, voy a Sevilla en motocicleta en abril, mi GPS me dice que la carretera SE 40 está abierta entre A 4 y A 49, pero en el mapa osm esta carretera está en construcción. Esta ruta ya está abierta, por favor, gracias
de vries (2017-07-21 10:57:05+00:00): Hi, In this changeset you made a bit of a mess with the relations you created. Would you please take a look at that? If you don't understand how the relations work, please ask for help, here or at the forums.

happy mapping!
Alan Trick (2017-08-14 00:22:34+00:00): Are you sure the max speed on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458143273 is 20?
PlaneMad (2017-10-04 07:10:47+00:00): Thank you for contributing. You have added the Arabic name in the wrong language field, please be careful about this.
manoharuss (2017-07-03 06:03:22+00:00): Hi Mds_travel,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But I have observed you have given the Pashto name that translates to `Rudawani Language`. Can you please confirm if this is the right name.


Thanks,

Manohar
Hjart (2017-07-02 21:06:15+00:00): Please note that you are not using Bing here
raymondnijssen (2017-07-05 07:28:47+00:00): ah, ok. tnx!
literan (2017-07-02 22:43:24+00:00): Здравствуйте! historic=monastery надо ставить один раз - на территорию бывшего монастыря, а не дублировать на каждом из его зданий. Иначе получается замножение сущностей
eggie (2017-07-03 07:16:49+00:00): PB gestuurd als welkom... Nr 151 komt nu twee keer voor als adres. De info zal ik samenvoegen met de adresnode van de BAG
PlaneMad (2017-07-05 06:12:40+00:00): Thank you for your contributions. What is your source for the power lines? They don't seem to be visible in the satellite imagery.
Alan (2017-07-03 00:30:01+00:00): Hello, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I see you are trying to add names to some water features. However, the nodes you created didn't have any tags on them. At minimum in this case they should have a 'name=', as well as a tag that explains what type of feature it is. 

In OSM however, we also usually add names directly to the feature itself, instead of adding the name as a separate node. So in this case, you would select the lake, and add a name tag to the lake.

I deleted the empty nodes that you created so far, but I encourage you to try again, this time adding the necessary tags to the correct features. Let us know if you need any help!
woodpeck (2022-05-11 20:33:44+00:00): Dear Diego_V, can you clarify the license of the data set that you have imported here? The site you specified as a source is not reachable anymore. If the data is not under a suitable open license, I am afraid you will have to delete it again.
SomeoneElse (2017-07-18 16:39:21+00:00): For an example of what I'm talking about, see the fix-up in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50384009 .
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-04 13:40:48+00:00): Hi, on ways 504628768 and 504628767 which are tagged as highway=footway (i.e. only pedestrian access is expected to be allowed), you have included access=private and foot=yes giving rise to confusion as to whether you meant the foot access to be private or allowed. It should not be necessary to set the access value on a footway, just the foot one (unless some other form of transport is actually allowed). Can you confirm whether pedestrian access is allowed?

Thanks,
Mike
Martin Wynne (2017-07-04 14:24:36+00:00): Hi Mike,

Thanks for your message. This is Forestry Commision land, which means that under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000 it is "Access Land" with the right to roam on foot anywhere except within 20 metres of a dwelling (unless on a public right of way). The distinction between an historic public right of way and the right to roam is a bit of a grey area. However, these paths are not marked as public rights of way on the OS maps.

These are narrow muddy foot paths through the heart of the forest, so not suitable for any other means of transport except perhaps mountain bikes. The Forestry Commission have laid out mountain bike trails elsewhere in Ribbesford Woods, I'm not sure if they allow bikes to go anywhere.

I have changed the access for bikes to permissive, I hope that's ok?

cheers,

Martin.
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-04 14:55:34+00:00): HI Martin, I wasn't questioning whether bikes have access, I was asking about the foot access because the combination of access=private and foot=yes on a footway gives rise to confusion as to whether the foot access is allowed or private (because although the foot tag overrides the access one, not all taggers realise that, and often set access=no when a path is closed, leaving foot=yes (i.e. the access=no has no effect). I suggest deleting access, horse and motor_vehicle, leaving just foot, highway and surface. If you don't know whether bicycles have access, then I would also delete the bicycle tag.

Best wishes,
Mike
Martin Wynne (2017-07-04 15:24:59+00:00): Hi Mike,

You have rather lost me. The land is private, owned by the Forestry Commission. There is no public right of way on these footpaths. There are on Access Land under the Countryside and Rights of Way Act 2000. That means the landowner can under certain circumstances temporarily close the area (for example if tree felling is taking place), or modify the route, or eliminate them as physical paths entirely provided access to the land remains.
 
On the other hand, if they were public rights of way, in order to temporarily close them the County Council would need to make and publish a legal Traffic Order to that effect, and it would be possible to object to it.

Are you planning to walk them? It is about 12 months since I last visited the area, but it is only a couple of miles from home so I could go and check the current status for you?

I will try to find out the exact position on mountain bike access in Ribbesford Woods and modify the OSM settings accordingly.

cheers,

Martin.
Mike Baggaley (2017-07-04 15:48:22+00:00): Sorry to have confused you. I'm not planning to walk them (at least at present) - I build my own Garmin GB map from OSM data, and my build process flagged up a warning on these ways about conflicting access tags. If you put access=private on a footway, that means the path cannot be used by the general public. If you put foot=yes on a path, it means the path can be used for walking by the general public. For a footway there is normally no other transport allowed so if  both are specified it is unclear which the mapper meant to apply. Hence my suggestion of removing all the access tags other than foot.

Does that seem any clearer?
Mike
Martin Wynne (2017-07-04 16:36:33+00:00): Hi Mike,
In the iD editor, when you set some things, other things change automatically. I don't recall setting access=private or highway=footway. I selected "Foot Path" from the menu, and set foot=yes (the need to do that for a foot path is not clear to me).
Whatever, it is not showing access=private now. Did you change it?
What is the proper way to show a footpath which is not a public right of way but which crosses Access Land?

cheers,

Martin.
Martin Wynne (2017-07-04 16:49:07+00:00): p.s. Mike,
According to the Wiki, yes="The public has an official, legally-enshrined right of access; i.e., it's a right of way."
These paths are not public rights of way. The public have a right of access to the land they cross, subject to certain conditions. But the actual route or existence of a path has no legal protection.
cheers, Martin.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-10 20:58:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1831823416/history
Why did you add a photo of the source de la Meuse that nobody can see because it is a file local on your computer? Can you make it available to everyone? (e.g. put it on Wikimedia and link to that file)
Eebie (2022-01-10 23:58:11+00:00): It is on Wikimedia https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maas_bron_1.jpg
marczoutendijk (2022-01-11 08:52:09+00:00): Thanks! That wasn't clear from the file description on OSM. 
I expected a (clickable) wikimidialink. But the interface on OSM is problematic because images in other formats show the image=* link directly (like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/760012208)
Eebie (2022-01-11 18:26:10+00:00): I also regret that within the Openstreetmap organization there is still a tendency against making the Openstreetmap itself more user-friendly.  That tendency finds it up to others to make user-friendly applications from Openstreetmap data. Viewing photo's in easy way is possible as shown in several applications as http://openpoimap.org/?map=various&zoom=15&lat=47.97463&lon=5.63268&layers=B00FFFFFFFFFFFFFTFFFFFF
marczoutendijk (2022-01-11 18:37:21+00:00): I know, because I'm the developer of OpenPoiMap: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenPoiMap.
Marc.
eggie (2017-07-03 07:21:43+00:00): maps1,
Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12  

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link "meld u aan om mee te praten" om een reactie te geven in deze changeset.
eggie (2017-07-03 07:22:44+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom
eggie (2017-07-03 07:28:46+00:00): Nr 38 zie ik ook op een ander pand staan. 
Tegenwoordig zetten we in osm alle info op de adresnode. Dat was door een voorgaande mapper al "fout" getagd. Zou je nog eens willen kijken?
highflyer74 (2017-07-03 06:31:13+00:00): Hallo Quaxx! Dies ist ein weiterer Versuch, mit Dir in Kontakt zu treten. Ich habe kommentiert und Dir auch eine PN geschrieben. Leider antwortest Du nicht.

Es unterlaufen Dir am laufenden Band Fehler beim Hinzufügen von Objekten. Dies ist ansich nicht schlimm, da Du noch "neu" beim Mappen bist. Aber: Man erwartet bei OSM auch einen gewissen Umgang mit seinen Mit-Mappern. Deshalb: Melde Dich bitte! Sowohl die Schreinerei als auch der Stihl Händler sind falsch getaggt.
Supaplex (2017-07-09 18:40:15+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
woodpeck (2017-10-03 00:05:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
woodpeck (2017-10-03 00:04:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
woodpeck (2017-10-03 00:05:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52581215 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits by Zowie Polie
trial (2017-10-06 20:01:27+00:00): Effectivement il y avait une erreur sur Ar Forc'h (c'est Chelott), Ar Forc't ce sont les 2 cailloux suivants
trial (2017-12-29 20:49:41+00:00): Bonjour, je vois que vous avez détruit tous les objets puis les avez recréés ce qui nuit à l'historique. De plus avez-vous repris les attributs précédents ? Il est vivement conseillé de discuter sur http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr avant de faire un import en France
Olyon (2018-01-11 06:50:56+00:00): J'ai remplacer toutes les cotes des îles. La géométrie des côtes n'étaient pas très bonne et il existe la BD TOPO Hydrographie en open data qui donne la ligne de haute mer et de basse mer avec une bonne qualité.
Dans ce changeset, il y a que des suppressions de node mais j'ai tout envoyé en même temps depuis josm, la suppression des anciens tracé et l'ajout des nouveaux.
Les changeset doivent être limité a 10000 objet je pense et le reste est dans d'autres changeset.
J'ai changer la geometrie des ligne de côte (ce qui m'a obligé a modifier les réserves naturelles qui y sont lié et je les ai mis a jour), j'ai aussi ajouté les zones découverte a marée basse.
J'ai bien sûr gardé les attributs existants auparavant.
trial (2018-01-11 20:04:19+00:00): entre temps j'avais vu que les attributs avaient été conservés (plutôt repris). La base en question correspond à une marée haute de coefficient 120 (et non de 95 comme demandé par OSM) et pis par calcul d'altitude, je cite : "La laisse des plus hautes mers est modélisée par une ligne d’altitude constante (de type courbe de niveau) dont l’altitude est calculée.
La laisse des plus basses mers est modélisée par une ligne correspondant à l'isobathe 0 (0 des cartes marines).". Source : http://professionnels.ign.fr/doc/DC-BDTOPO-2-2.pdf
Diegopl95 (2017-07-03 02:15:00+00:00): #406-PADF-Perpendicular-URL El Campanero Mixco
lleung (2017-07-04 05:36:12+00:00): The location of POIs are wrong. Maybe because of the map offset in China.
Warin61 (2017-07-11 03:22:25+00:00): Hi,
I've been working on this treed area. 
The Barrington Top NP is not all trees .. nor do the trees stop at its boundaries. 
I have added a new relationship 7387469 for this treed area. I will work on it - expand and add holes.
mbethke (2017-07-03 13:30:23+00:00): I just fixed this by putting all the names on a single POI. The Lao name should go into "name" and "name:lo", the English one in "name:en". Maps.me makes it a bit difficult to do that though
arivenid (2019-02-28 01:52:27+00:00): "Hi Aulia Ishmata,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the  way 504650968 classified as 'unclassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,this should be marked as 'service' as it is leading to a industrial area.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
Supaplex (2017-07-03 10:47:08+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:internet_access
可以加SSID的名稱
internet_access:ssid=*
s8321414 (2017-07-03 11:40:51+00:00): 我應該已經加了？還是我 key 打錯了？
andrewwiseman (2018-11-13 23:11:02+00:00): Thanks for mapping! When mapping roads it's good practice to connect them to the surrounding road network so people can use them to route. Thanks!
Supaplex (2017-07-03 06:38:39+00:00): #tofix 不小心合併了便利商店和公車站了
Supaplex (2017-07-09 18:41:47+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
nevw (2017-07-03 06:02:54+00:00): Hi
you have misspelled as 'Servied' but I expect this is not the actual name of the park if it even has a name. See access tag comment on other changeset.
nevw (2017-07-03 05:56:53+00:00): Welcome to the Openstreetmap. 
Please don't use the name=* tag as a description. It is only for the actual name of the park if it has one.
nevw (2017-07-03 05:59:47+00:00): If the park is not open to the public and you you wish tag as such, use the access=* keys instead, such as access=no or access=private.
RicoElectrico (2017-07-04 19:29:53+00:00): This is not a place of worship. Please correct the type. Also, keep in mind we are not an advertising platform, your changeset description hints otherwise.
freebeer (2018-06-20 12:20:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60009503 where the changeset comment is: Delete bogus maps.me personal info castle spam
user_5359 (2017-07-03 16:21:46+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
dee_ksha (2019-03-12 13:44:23+00:00): Hi Randy Febri Nanda,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, I have come across the area way 447356389 in which all the ways are classified as "Residential", but as per imagery and other ways around 
Ways inside military area seems to be classified as "service"
Hence making the necessary changes as of now. Please suggest if it is otherwise.

Thanks in advance.
tuxayo (2017-07-04 06:52:32+00:00): Congrats for making changeset 50000000! 🎉🎉🎉
Aphroditelita (2019-02-22 01:29:24+00:00): GET
eggie (2017-07-03 08:13:18+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom