piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-01-11 22:29:53+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:26:02+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55365607
viloan (2018-01-11 22:34:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
zors1843 (2018-01-12 05:25:44+00:00): Enkele opmerkingen bij je changeset : voor tuin gebruiken we leisure:garden, niet park.  Maak geen gemeenschappelijk nodes met wegen. Baken precies af hoe groot de tuin is : nu is een gebouw inbegrepen en een parking.  Geef geen naam aan een tuin.
Mvg
viloan (2018-01-11 22:37:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-03-05 22:47:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56917896 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon-inspired 'parks' near Gosport - will try and re-add back any new mapping (benches etc.)
frosm (2018-01-11 23:10:12+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap
êtes vous entrain de faire sans vous rendre compte des tests sur la carte mondiale ?
car je trouve étrange que la tour change de nome et soie maintenant réservée aux personnes à mobilité réduite
si c'est le cas, avez vous vu un panneau sur place qui l'indique ?
n'hésitez pas à mettre un commentaire pour vos changements, cela aide les autres à comprendre les modifications
Captain_Spork (2018-01-12 08:38:40+00:00): Hello Meaghyn,

I have reverted this changeset in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55373520

You created a new road Zelhemseweg over the existing road. This seems to be incorrect to me.

For as far as I can see the Zelhemseweg goes from Ruurlo Zelhem. It however changes to Veldhoekseweg when it crosses the brigde over Veengoot.

Please explain your intentions and please be aware that the changes you make are put live on the map immediately.

Also when you make a change please add a comment with what you have changed.

Please respond.

Best regards,
Mark
eggie (2018-01-19 12:25:16+00:00): Ha Mark... het was al weer park geworden. Ik het heb het net weer hersteld met een revert.. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55575575#map=15/51.8872/4.3896
....het kan verkeren...
Captain_Spork (2018-01-19 12:46:01+00:00): Ha Egbert,

Ja hier had ik inderdaad e.e.a. verbeterd. Deze kwam tevoorschijn op mijn 3dShapes overpass query. Ik had een nieuwe polygon leisure=park polygon getekend met de naam Deijffelbroeksepark en de leisure=park en naam van de landuse afgehaald.

Ik kan me best voorstellen dat het Deijffelbroeksepark groter is dan hoe het nu getekend is maar hoe Amanda het heeft gedaan is inderdaad niet de bedoeling :). Als het park werkelijk groter is moet ze gewoon de polygon over een wat groter gebied leggen.

Ah wel, het is teruggedraaid dus nu maar afwachten of ze nog reageert.

Bedankt in ieder geval!

Groeten,
Mark
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-03-05 22:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56917896 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Pokemon-inspired 'parks' near Gosport - will try and re-add back any new mapping (benches etc.)
viloan (2018-01-11 23:07:51+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-01-12 06:09:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/397308176
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:26:37+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55366327
user_5359 (2018-01-12 06:08:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please? If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead or let the key empty.

And please add the property of the park not only one node.
viloan (2018-01-11 23:35:16+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-01-12 06:06:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark single building as landuse=residential. Please use building=yes.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:28:18+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55366708
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:27:42+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55366735
dgitto (2018-01-12 09:46:34+00:00): benvenuto in OSM!
S-zation (2018-01-12 00:01:59+00:00): This changeset reverts the edits made in changesets 55325286, 55325385, 55325512, 55325563, 55325668
viloan (2018-01-11 23:59:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:38:43+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55366887
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:39:00+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55366948
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:39:21+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55367046
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:39:39+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55367138
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:39:56+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55367184
Supaplex (2018-01-21 12:40:58+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:52:07+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55367261
dgitto (2018-01-12 09:34:03+00:00): Ciao, considera che è un po' inutile disegnare gli edifici usando le ortofoto di Bing o altro, dato che abbiamo fonti molto più precise e allineate. Forse è più utile (agli inizi) concentrarsi su altro. come attività commerciali, servizi pubblici, farmacie, banche, hotel, ecc ecc
Ad ogni modo, anche con l'editor ID (che stai usando) c'è il comando per ortogonalizzare le geometrie (rende retti tutti gli angoli, com'è spesso per gli edifici recenti
eggie (2018-01-12 07:32:15+00:00): In orde .. wel je commentaar concreter svp.
eggie (2018-01-12 07:30:59+00:00): commentaar...dus playground toegevoegd
viloan (2018-01-12 01:07:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-01-12 07:29:20+00:00): Graag concreet commentaar bij je edits.. dus artwork toegevoegd.
eggie (2018-01-12 07:35:17+00:00): Zijn toch goede edits nu.. .. nu volhouden. :)
iandees (2018-01-12 01:28:19+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55367579
iandees (2018-01-12 01:28:54+00:00): There isn't actually a reservoir here. Please only add real things to the map.
iandees (2018-01-12 02:28:36+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55367592
baveggies9999 (2018-01-13 01:51:43+00:00): This is not accurate. Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule

and 
http://www.pikepass.com
http://www.odot.org/tcomm/agendas14/tc_agenda-20140310-r-special.pdf

Despite your legislative link, the highway is clearly referred to in common practice as "Creek Turnpike" and should be noted as such. Please revert.
baveggies9999 (2018-01-13 01:59:04+00:00): The "Liberty Memorial Parkway" designation is clearly an ancillary designation to "Creek Turnpike" and not the primary name of the roadway based on the PDF to which you linked. 

All signage still indicates "Creek Turnpike" and ODOT sources indicate that it and the Turnpike Agency still consider that to be the primary name of the roadway. Calling this "Liberty Memorial Parkway" is confusing and misleading for road users and not reflective of reality.
US Highway 266 (2018-01-13 03:09:50+00:00): I personally verified that this road is indeed signed as the "Creek Turnpike". There is a single sign that says "Liberty Parkway" which is clearly a tertiary or even quaternary honorific name for this road. Nowhere is the name "Liberty Memorial Parkway" listed as a name for this road. There is no mention of "Liberty Parkway" or "Liberty Memorial Parkway" on the Oklahoma Department of Transportation website (https://ok.gov/odot) or the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority website (www.pikepass.com). The guideline is "the government with effective and sustained control of the area has an official source of names or an official stance on a naming dispute, then that name is default." The Oklahoma Turnpike Authority (OTA) is the governmental agency with effective and sustained control of this roadway, and they refer to it exclusively as "Creek Turnpike" or "SH 364".
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:14:28+00:00): "Liberty Parkway" appears on signage at either end of the route.  Additionally, alt_name and the relation are named "Creek Turnpike".  These names are both accurate.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:14:32+00:00): "Liberty Parkway" appears on signage at either end of the route.  Additionally, alt_name and the relation are named "Creek Turnpike".  These names are both accurate.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:18:40+00:00): Liberty Memorial Parkway was the compromise name after this was brought to the Data Working Group last time, I'd consider Liberty Parkway to be more valid than Liberty Memorial Parkway.
Duke87 (2018-01-13 03:33:24+00:00): Is there an official DWG decision about this online anywhere? I concur with US 266 and baveggies - the road is quite clearly named "Creek Turnpike" on all major signage as well as in general practice. The name "Liberty Parkway" is on only one sign (that I am aware of) - this should be the alt_name, not the other way around.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:39:57+00:00): There is signage westbound. It's at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4884335483 and at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4884339565 , plus the cited doc in the source notes also supports this.
US Highway 266 (2018-01-13 04:33:22+00:00): The official name of the road is "Creek Turnpike". "Liberty Parkway" is a tertiary name, a nickname if you will. It isn't the main name of the road. I've lived near the turnpike for over a decade and I've never heard anybody call it "Liberty Parkway". Locals always call it "Creek Turnpike". I've never seen any references to a "Liberty Memorial Parkway" anywhere but this site. Could you please provide a cite for "Liberty Memorial Parkway"?
US Highway 266 (2018-01-13 05:10:03+00:00): This picture which was taken by me on September 9, 2014 is of a guide sign on westbound US 64/northbound US 169/eastbound OK 364 which clearly shows the road as "Creek Turnpike". This is not the only sign to refer to it as such.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/watuzi/17423431070/in/dateposted-public/
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 06:01:56+00:00): That picture is referencing route numbers and route names, not street level names.  You find a similar situation in Oregon, for example, at Mission Street and Santiam Highway in the Salem area or OR 569 Randy Papé Beltline, previously known and alternately signed as The Beltline or Beltline Road.  Route signage for OR 569 "Beltline" doesn't stop it from being known as OR 569 "Randy Papé Beltline", other than the Oregon DOT being substantially more consistent about updating signage in a timely manner.  Whereas, even with streets that have been long since renamed, it's common for OklaDOT to sign its streets by shield (or transliterating the shield only) to the wayfinding signs, even after updating confirmation signage to be consistent.

This differs from purely honorary signage, which uses brown signs.  For example, US 26 in the Portland western suburbs, is Northwest Sunset Highway or just Sunset Highway where it runs through southwest or ambiguous parts of town.  There are brown signs indicating honorific naming, and legislation indicating a specifically secondary name, and the route shields are specifically "US 26".  In the Liberty Parkway's case, the legislative name is specifically "Liberty Memorial Parkway," the actual signs say "Liberty Parkway" or simply "Turnpike", and the route shields are OK 364 or the OTA route "Creek Turnpike", ie, named instead of numbered, route.  OSM is going towards using relations to handle routes, and both the OTA route and the OK 364 route on the section in question are named "Creek Turnpike", as that name undeniably describes the whole route.  However, there are constituent roadways with a differing name.  

Please note that the route name is not in dispute, and so far, all arguments in this thread for naming the road "Creek Turnpike" are ignoring that the route are what is most commonly referred to.  In which, I would direct folks expecting the whole route name to refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7251917, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4117702, https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1250472 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1250473

The way names _litearlly_ only apply to the ways.  I believe US Highway 266, Duke 87 and baveggies9999 are _entirely_ correct for the routes, and if the names differ from "Creek Turnpike", then, yes, go ahead and change those names, but for the actual constituent ways between US 169 and OK 51, that's the Liberty Parkway.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 06:05:09+00:00): That said, I don't envy any of us for dealing with Oklahoma's entirely insane inconsistency in dealing with highway names in general.  However, ultimately, getting things named consistently at all levels is something that needs to be handled at the level of "stop (re-)electing people who are in favor of arbitrarily renaming everything" and less at "let's start editing OSM against reality" level.  I want to be on your side, but that's not what's on the ground right now.
US Highway 266 (2018-01-14 01:07:09+00:00): The official name of the road is "Creek Turnpike". Until you provide evidence otherwise, OSM should reflect this. Two signs and one PDF file do not prove the name of a road has changed.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-14 18:43:27+00:00): I'm sorry you can't accept the ground truth as fact, and I'm done trying to point out the difference between a route and a road or how to read a relation.