piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
majkaz (2016-12-15 15:53:55+00:00): Hello again.

As already mentioned several times in comments and in mail to your account, please, please check that what you are putting on the map isn't already there. 
The Mombasa Bus stand, for example, is mapped since August 2015, for the second time mapped by yourself in February 2016 and now for the third time. Similar for the Kibeberu bus stop, the Hospital ya jeshi and Machimbo bus stand (again twice by you). There is more in this changeset, I stopped at the Diana cafe (again, already on the map).

I am not sure, what the problem is. Even though the maps.me map doesn't show the newest changes, the old ones had to be there, unless you haven't updated the map for a long time. And if you cannot see that you already put something on the map, bring it up to the maps.me developers, do not simply add it again.

And please, answer the comments - we would like to know if you are reading it.
mavl (2017-10-20 15:03:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
dmlu (2019-07-19 10:53:51+00:00): Hi, I realize this is a super old changeset, but do you perhaps remember what you meant by "old FB"? I'm trying to match the tagging scheme of (older) trees in Luxembourg to a more consistent tagging scheme :)
wilda69 (2019-07-19 15:21:16+00:00): Hello there,
In 1980 the Luxembourg Ministry of Tourism published a booklet with 100+ nationwide walks. Many of these had their routings changed over the years, and when this happened every effort was made to remove any evidence of a blue/white pointer along the old tracks and paths. However, a few escaped the attention of the organisers but these are often difficult to detect as nature has been claiming ground.
Originally, the ones plotted by a small group of us were all scattered in woods and forests where paths have vanished (eg Fingig). However, the Bertrange ones are now on a path that is again clearly visible and regularly used. I visited it a few weeks ago and noticed that one of the FB trees has fallen and will probably be removed.
So in short, it is an attempt to catalogue where man once trod but nature has taken over.
Interested to hear about your idea of tagging older trees!
Best wishes,
Dan
mavl (2017-10-20 15:04:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:51+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Supaplex (2016-12-15 13:38:17+00:00): Good job
有看到這問題
maraf24 (2016-12-15 15:37:45+00:00): W Bolesławcu nie ma ulicy Wojska Polskiego. 
Jest Aleja Wojska Polskiego.
Było poprawnie, teraz jest źle.
DD1GJ (2016-12-15 19:37:08+00:00): Hallo, hör bitte auf, die Tags der ausgeschilderten kombinierten Fuß- und Radwege von "designated" auf "yes" zu setzen. Du verschlechterst damit den Datenbestand

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:access%3Ddesignated
Commodoortje (2016-12-15 23:17:26+00:00): Allereerst welkom op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2016-12-15 23:18:32+00:00): Mag ik vragen wat je aan het proberen bent?
Ik zie iets met boundary=administrative
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gy0jr39h7pa3xat/2016-12-16_00-15-54.png?raw=1
thetornado76 (2017-09-11 04:40:22+00:00): Ich habe die Wege im Nova Eventis wieder auf highway=corridor zurück geändert. siehe auch hier http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dcorridor
mapper999 (2016-12-16 19:35:23+00:00): Hallo, 
die Fähre ist weiterhin in Betrieb, sie macht nur Winterpause. Die Betriebszeiten sind auch korrekt eingetragen.
Deine Vorgehensweise einfach den bicycle-Wert so anzupassen, dass das Routing für dich (und den von dir verwendeten Router) funktioniert, entspricht nicht so ganz dem OSM-Gedanken. Bitte unterlasse solche Änderungen. Bei konkreten Routingproblemen mit einer bestimmten App, wendest du dich am besten an die entsprechenden Entwickler. Wenn der Fehler mit mehreren Routing-Lösungen nachvollzogen werden kann, kannst du ihn auch gerne als Karten-Fehler auf osm.org melden.
majkaz (2016-12-15 16:37:10+00:00): Another changeset, the same problem.
Can you please check the position? Almost everything you are putting on the map is in the middle of a road. And again, the tags you are using aren't helping.
mavl (2017-10-20 15:04:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
mavl (2017-10-20 15:04:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
naoliv (2017-10-28 16:40:40+00:00): Leonardo, o que você utilizou para obter o nome das ruas, por favor?
mavl (2017-10-20 15:03:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
Supaplex (2016-12-15 15:37:00+00:00): Is there a GPS trace for the ferry line?
ff5722 (2016-12-15 15:44:12+00:00): No, you can add fixme=estimate or something similar, but I think it's obvious that it needs detailing
mavl (2017-10-20 15:04:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
Владимир К (2016-12-19 11:26:04+00:00): 40/06А находится с с другой стороны шамиля усманова. Надо бы перенести точку
dgitto (2016-12-15 16:38:21+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM
mavl (2017-10-20 15:03:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53098778 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44417818].
SK53 (2017-01-15 23:46:22+00:00): Having Dunleary coming up in Nominatim searches instead of Dun Laoghaire seems very anachronistic. But then Kingstown would be a hell of a lot worse!
mackerski (2017-01-16 08:29:43+00:00): It would be anachronistic if Dunleary wasn't the name in daily use by most people. But it is.  The vague similarity between the spellings of the Irish and English names coupled with an initiative to get people to move to the Irish name has led to an odd situation where people say "Dunleary" but write "Dun Laoire" or some other Creole of the Irish name. There is no more valid candidate for name:en and it is furthermore valid to allow nomination to match searches for it. The name tag remains at the Irish name, which reflects on the ground signage etc.
SK53 (2017-01-16 09:33:08+00:00): And I thought you'd just tell me to change my browser locale settings.
jaap de vries (2016-12-21 12:33:13+00:00): Ik zie dat je bij dit restaurant de naam Floris hebt ingevuld, moet dit niet Bij Roel Linssen zijn?
Daarnaast hoef je maar 1x een naam tag toevoegen, dus niet nog eens bij name_NL en als er een Engelse naam bekend is dan vul je die in bij name_EN. En als laatste een postcode zet je neer zonder spatie.
arcanma (2017-01-22 16:26:35+00:00): Il percorso 459839096 non ha nessun tag, secondo la descrizione del gruppo di modifiche dovrebbe avere highway=residential. Dalle foto aeree non mi sembra il tag adatto, direi di utilizzare highway=service o in alternativa highway=track. Vedere https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:highway.
Nella zona vedo che ci sono molte way senza alcun tag inserite sempre da Tommabast, suppongo sempre perché inserito il tipo di strada nella descrizione della modifica e non sull'oggetto.
jaap de vries (2016-12-21 12:42:59+00:00): Wil je hier ook even de postcode en de naam aanpassen?
Palolo (2023-02-11 20:24:08+00:00): Should this be tagged as a shop=food or  amenity=restaurant? A community_centre is a social facility.
Alecs01 (2016-12-15 19:18:57+00:00): Ciao Pietro, cosa intendevi mappare qui? immagino nulla del genere vista la posizione: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=outdoor?uselang=it
majkaz (2016-12-15 16:29:19+00:00): Another changeset, the same problem.
Can you please check the position? Everything you are putting on the map is in the middle of a road.
jaap de vries (2016-12-21 12:38:10+00:00): Ik zie dat er 2x name tags heb toegevoegd terwijl de naam al aanwezig was, haal je ze even weg?
jaap de vries (2016-12-21 12:36:59+00:00): Ook hier zie ik dat je de postcode foutief hebt ingevuld, het moet dus zonder spatie. Verbeter je dat even?
En is hier wel een Engelse naam bekend en staat dit ook op de gevel van de winkel?
Hjart (2016-12-15 19:42:27+00:00): Jeg har tilladt mig at tynde ud i denne her skov af tags du har lavet på stierne ved Ellekonedalen og desuden ændre lidt på de resterende. For det første vil jeg mene det er ret misvisende at tagge dem som "track" (på dansk mark- eller skovveje) og for det andet var størstedelen af  taggene noget overkill for en decideret gangsti.
Constable (2017-09-10 07:13:39+00:00): Ciao, in riferimento a questa strada http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/151871970, ho visto che l'hai trasformata in unclassified. Sono passato alcuni mesi fa e mi sembrava di aver inteso che fosse una ciclabile, non accessibile alle auto. In base a cosa hai deciso di trasformala da footway a unclassified? sei passato ultimamente?
grazie, ciao
eggie (2018-03-16 18:16:13+00:00): Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
andi9876 (2016-12-16 03:34:28+00:00): Dear, please stop add artworks and attractions.
andi9876 (2016-12-16 03:34:10+00:00): Dear, please stop add artworks and attractions.
Martin Borsje (2017-03-14 20:08:39+00:00): reverted
SomeoneElse (2016-12-16 16:06:06+00:00): Oops, looks like the bounding box here became a bit large by accident :)
Martin Borsje (2017-03-14 20:07:56+00:00): reverted
gileri (2016-12-15 21:43:09+00:00): Bonjour,

Je pense pas qu'il soit pertinent de mettre bus=yes sur les plateformes liés aux trajets des bus; rien ne la différencie d'une plateforme pour trolley, voire tram. Je pense que bus=yes a une utilité seulement sur public_transport=stop_position.

D'ailleurs la page wiki dit la même chose : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform

En tout cas merci pour tes contributions, surtout sur les transports en commun qui représentent un sacré boulot !
Olyon (2016-12-15 23:57:07+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai vu que sur le wiki c'est indiqué que sur les stop_position (mais c'est pas indiqué de ne pas le mettre sur les platform).
Les platform si elles ne servent qu'a attendre le bus, le tag bus=yes n'est pas une information fausse et jusqu'a maintenant sur le rendu (comme celui sur openstreetmap.org) il n'y a que les highway=bus_stop d'indiqué avec un symbole de bus qui est le plus souvent placé là où est placé la platform. Si on abandonne highway=bus_stop les rendu ne seront plus si c'est un arrêt pour le bus ou le metro par exemple donc je trouve pertinent de l'indiquer.
En gros, je trouve pas très clair les 2 version pour indiqué un arrêt de bus et comme mettre bus = yes c'est pas indiqué quelque chose de "faux" je le met aussi avec public_transport=platform et highway=bus_stop.
gileri (2016-12-23 09:38:51+00:00): C'est un peu mapper pour le rendu dans ce cas :)

Mais je conçois qu'il soit difficile pour un rendu de détecter que cette plateforme soit utilisée pour des itinéraires de bus, et qu'en soit ce ne soit pas faux de mettre bus=yes sur les plateformes, mais juste légèrement redondant.

Merci pour ta réponse !
carciofo (2016-12-16 14:53:47+00:00): Hi & thanks for your edit! Regarding Bill Dr & West Anoka Ln, is it possible to cross by foot? If so, could you please connect them with a highway=footway (or path as appropriate); if not, please add noexit=yes to the terminal node of W Anoka Ln in order to avoid data quality tools marking this as an unconnected road. Thanks! :)
eggie (2020-06-04 07:42:28+00:00): Alsnog Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
GerdP (2017-08-29 07:55:59+00:00): Hi!
Please review typo highway=route on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459872611
I've also noticed a lot of highway=unclassified what look like highway=residential in this city.
Botaler (2017-09-02 06:21:01+00:00): Salve.
Lei ha ragione. Essendo la strada inghiaiata l'avevo classificata route. Sicuramente è corretto classificarla residential. Ci sono andato il 31/08/2017: la strada continua ad essere inghiaiata. Ho provveduto a correggere con il gruppo di modifiche #51660966 and #51661196.
Grazie per la sua osservazione.
Eliano
Hello.
You are right. Being the surface gravel I had classified it as a route. Surely it is correct to classify it as a residential one. I went on 31/08/2017: the road continues to be with gravel. I have corrected with changesets # 51660966 and #51661196.
Thank you for your comment.
Eliano
GerdP (2017-09-02 08:03:28+00:00): Salve,
thanks for the feedback. I still see some residential roads like Via Monte Grappa or Via Professor Oliva which are tagged unclassified. Maybe you can clean up those as well?
Protoxenus (2017-10-13 09:01:42+00:00): Hallo,
 du hast hier eine Höchstgeschwindigkeit von 90 km/h für die B110 eingetragen. Woher hast du diesen Wert? Der Wert ist in DE nicht üblich
Gruß Protoxenus
ff5722 (2016-12-15 19:50:00+00:00): Some village locations mayb be incorrect due to rough GNS data. I've moved them all manually to the most likely position. Also, in some cases, the Hanzi name is missing, this will have to fixed from survey or local knowledge.
rainerU (2016-12-24 09:02:09+00:00): Il ne faut trop se fier aux images Bing : il y a un muret qui sépare la Rue du Conflent de la voie de service.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-16 16:10:28+00:00): Hi Daniel Gamboa Alvarez, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting many POIs in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44432003
Alexander-II (2017-12-10 14:25:53+00:00): Что вы хотели отметить, указав https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/122944361/history тег level=1? Этот тег означает, что объект располагается на 1 этаже. Может вы хотели указать этажность здания - building:levels=?
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-16 16:09:35+00:00): Hi Daniel Gamboa Alvarez, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting many POIs in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44432049
SomeoneElse (2016-12-29 21:23:24+00:00): @pitscheplatsch does this need reverting?  It looks like it might be a "I think I'm editing my own personal map" type of problem.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-30 17:35:59+00:00): @SomeoneElse same here, no answer. I think we/you should revert it.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-30 18:04:01+00:00): OK, done.
Horace (2016-12-15 20:44:10+00:00): j'annule cette modif. Le rendu marchait mais problème de cache.
M!dgard (2020-02-24 10:56:11+00:00): Hi Verdy_p

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1313222017 has name:right on a node. Is this perhaps accidental, or does it have something to do with the junction?

Kind regards, M!dgard
Verdy_p (2020-02-24 11:09:38+00:00): most probably accidental selection, because this is not the local name at that position and not the directions
name:right on a node has no meaning
Verdy_p (2020-02-24 13:33:34+00:00): this is fixed
HubMiner (2017-08-19 05:20:45+00:00): Hi, about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459890452/history / does it make sense to keep it on the map, if nothing is allowed on this path?  We could change it to "highway=abandoned" if you would prefer to keep it on the map.
literan (2016-12-16 10:37:00+00:00): вы поставили аптеку на проезжей части. вынужден откатить.
frosm (2019-11-29 15:17:01+00:00): Hello,

why did you put french ref for a tree in Argentina ?
it's a wrong copy/paste ?
SomeoneElse (2016-12-19 23:41:11+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4556191294 just someone's house?
Best Regards,
Andy
mavl (2019-06-05 16:28:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-16 16:12:24+00:00): Are you sure that these are "gift" shops?  If they're really record shops please don't map them as something else.
You can see what shop tags are in use looking at http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/shop#values .  "shop=music" seems to be the most popular tag for record shops.
You won't be able to do this using MAPS.ME so you'll need to go to openstreetmap.org on a PC and use one of the web-based editors there.
If you have any questions please don't hesitate to get in touch.
Best Regards,
Andy
trigpoint (2016-12-16 17:29:05+00:00): Also please check that what you are adding is in the correct place. For example Piccadilly Records is already mapped some distance from your addition.
Your additions of one type of object is spead over a very large area, what is your source of information/location.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:29+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-06-05 16:29:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
MarBur (2017-01-06 09:53:59+00:00): I would like to know what kind of problem with license did you find? I had a feeling that GURS is OK to use according to this: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56034
fredi_alf (2017-01-06 13:40:52+00:00): Dobil sem opozorilo od moderatorja, ki se je glasilo:
----------------
There are two problems with this. First of all, you must not import data into OSM without following our import guidelines which mandate that you discuss the import before you act. Second, you must not import data that is "free except for commercial use", because the license that OSM itself uses allows commercial use, hence the "noncommerical" restriction of the original licensor cannot be kept. This import needs to be removed again. Can you do it, or would you like help?
----------------
zato sem moral pobrisati/revertirati nekatere podatke
lp
Offenbacher_ (2016-12-18 18:37:22+00:00): Please undo
letihu (2016-12-26 12:46:01+00:00): Hier hat die defekte, veraltete wheelmap wohl wieder vier Fehler gemacht.
Vielleicht weißt Du noch, wo die Punkte wirklich hingehören ;-)
Ich habe sie nur auseinander gezogen.
freeExec (2016-12-16 09:10:13+00:00): Почему у вас все дома отмечены как многоквартирные многоэтажки, хотя там частный сектор?
И вы копируете данные с другой карты?
map-vl-ru (2016-12-19 04:00:45+00:00): Спасибо за отзыв, мы исправили типы домов.
Да, мы открываем геоданные нашей компании для сообщества OSM.
josmougn (2024-06-11 13:51:57+00:00): Why did you remove this node?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4223994193 ?
andi9876 (2016-12-16 03:31:07+00:00): Dear, please stop add artworks and attractions.
Supaplex (2016-12-16 04:00:58+00:00): 山峰可以另外用點位 natural=peak 表示
andi9876 (2016-12-16 03:32:16+00:00): Dear, please stop add artworks and attractions.
andresgarcia_am (2016-12-16 03:43:57+00:00): Correção: criação de lago e inclusão de nome de lagos.
Supaplex (2016-12-16 03:57:10+00:00): 畫面中營區有名稱嗎？一般我們會放營區名稱而不是番號。當然如果掛牌中的名稱是番號就用門口的名稱
andi9876 (2016-12-20 11:32:31+00:00): Dear, please stop add artworks and attractions.
andi9876 (2016-12-20 11:33:07+00:00): Dear, please stop add artworks and attractions.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:21:03+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-16 15:56:36+00:00): Hi onoji, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting some many POIs in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44438093
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:21:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:20:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2018-01-06 22:16:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:33:12+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-16 15:57:29+00:00): Hi onoji, welcome to OSM. May I know the reason behind deleting some many roads in this changeset. See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44438328
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:21:15+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Supaplex (2016-12-24 09:34:08+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!