piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SHARCRASH (2021-12-06 19:43:15+00:00): Bonjour! S'il vous plait n'utilisez pas "amenity=shelter" pour des nichoirs à hérissons. Ce tag est prévu uniquement pour les abris pour humains et ce même si vous l'avez précisé dans le nom, déjà considéré comme une mauvaise pratique par beaucoup, car en terme de données ce n'est pas juste et enduira certainement des utilisateurs en erreur.

J'ai également remarqué que vous avez enregistré une terrasse. Si c'est un endroit où on peut s'assoir, il y a un tag prévu à cet effet "leisure=outdoor seating"
SHARCRASH (2021-12-06 19:43:55+00:00): "leisure=outdoor_seating"
Florent Wehrli (2021-12-08 10:35:46+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour ce conseil.
Que puis-je utiliser pour les abris à hérissons comme attributs svp?
CapitaineMoustache (2021-11-26 17:55:38+00:00): Comme pour l'Office de Tourisme de Charlieu (voir discussion ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114177090), j'ai fait un le ménage dans les étiquettes et rajouté des infos de contact.

Même remarque pour les horaires, pourriez-vous donner les horaires complets (c'est un peu confus sur le site de l'office) ?
Je pourrais les ajouter pour vous, si vous le souhaitez.
Frans S (2022-02-05 11:58:59+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions). Most buildings here are round and should be mapped as round buildings.

E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114176998
CapitaineMoustache (2021-11-26 17:38:30+00:00): Bonjour Marion,
Attention, vous avez changé la valeur de l'étiquette "information" en "information=office_de_tourisme" alors que celle recommandée pour les offices de tourisme est "information=office", d'après le wiki OSM : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:information%3Doffice
Le wiki OSM est la documentation prioritaire pour étiqueter sur OSM, veillez à vérifier la signification des étiquettes dessus pour être sûre que votre contribution soit la plus précise et exacte possible.

Une astuce pour savoir comment se cartographie quelque chose : vous tapez sur Google "[ce que vous voulez cartographier] tag osm" et avec un peu chance, le premier résultat sera la page wiki de l'élément cherché !
(exemple avec les offices de tourisme : https://www.google.com/search?channel=crow5&client=firefox-b-d&q=office+de+tourisme+tag+osm)

J'ai effectué la correction sur l'Office de Tourisme de Charlieu et j'ai ajouté quelques infos de contact.
A propos des horaires, ils s'ajoutent avec la clé "opening_hours".

Vous pouvez essayer de les ajouter grâce à l'outil YoHours (https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/), plus intuitif (une fois les plages placées, vous n'avez qu'à copier-coller la valeur créée en haut du tableau).
Après, comme les horaires changent suivant la saison, il faut ajouter des conditions suivant les mois, ce qui est possible avec cet outil.
Si vous trouvez ça trop compliqué, je peux m'en charger !

Cependant, je ne connais pas les horaires complets, pourriez-vous me les faire connaître ?
Roannais Tourisme (2021-11-29 08:53:04+00:00): Bonjour, 
Les horaires de l'office de Roanne :
Du 01/10 au 31/03 --> du L au S de 9h30 à 1h
Du 01/04 au 30/09 --> 9h30 à 18h
Merci beaucoup.
Marion.
Roannais Tourisme (2021-11-29 08:56:29+00:00): Bonjour, 
Pour les horaires de l'office de Charlieu, je vous invite à cliquer sur ce lien : https://www.leroannais.com/commerces-et-services/office-de-tourisme-du-pays-de-charlieu-belmont/
Merci.
Marion.
CapitaineMoustache (2021-11-29 17:37:02+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai ajouté les horaires de l'Office de Tourisme de Roanne et de Charlieu-Belmont.
Pour Charlieu-Belmont, j'ai créé des horaires simplifiés en ne prenant en compte que les changements saisonniers (octobre-avril et mai-septembre).
Les cas particuliers sont laissés de côté.

Bonne journée !
fabiotofy (2021-11-24 19:06:00+00:00): Ciao, sarebbe interessante capire anche qual è il civico dell'edificio posto ad inizio via, sulla sinistra. (proprio quello fronte al numero 2) coordinate 45.96490/12.98401. Grazie, ciao
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114177183
NonnEmilia (2021-11-24 19:13:47+00:00): La prossima volta che vado a trovare i parenti ci butto l'occhio! Ciao
maraf24 (2021-11-24 12:21:57+00:00): Coś tu nie wyszło :)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148940737
tm261700 (2021-11-25 07:52:58+00:00): Nie dostałem błędów odnośnie wskazanego obiektu  terenu zabudowy.
maraf24 (2021-11-25 10:12:02+00:00): JOSM daje ostrzeżenie o budynku na budynku.
gscscnd (2021-11-25 07:12:12+00:00): Nikt jej nie używa dla tej części miasta?
tm261700 (2021-11-25 07:50:02+00:00): W bazie GUS oraz w obiegu prawnym urzędu miasta nie występuje ta nazwa . Nigdy oficjalnie nie została zatwierdzona.
gscscnd (2021-11-25 08:00:58+00:00): Mieszkańcy też jej nie znają?
tm261700 (2021-11-25 08:35:38+00:00): Pewnie jakaś część może tak. Tak jak pisałem wcześniej nigdy taka nazwa nie powinna znaleźć się na mapach nie znana jest geneza tej nazwy, nie jest to nazwa historyczna. Prawdopodobnie budowniczy tej dzielnicy tak ją nazwali.
maraf24 (2021-11-25 10:09:44+00:00): https://pzgik.geoportal.gov.pl/prng/Miejscowosc/PL.PZGiK.204.PRNG.00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000010262-7707
Jak widać, na jakichś mapach się znalazła.
Zamiast kasować bezpieczniej było dać disused:place, skoro z PRNG nie została usunięta.
tm261700 (2021-11-25 10:22:17+00:00): Dane w geoportal.gov.pl nie są danymi źródłowymi. W większości mają tam bałagan w danych, a jeżeli chodzi o mapy BDOT to jest prehistoria. 
Staram się zawsze docierać do danych źródłowych w tym wypadku jest to gmina i baza TERYT GUS gdzie nazwa ta nie jest ujęta.
maraf24 (2021-11-25 10:59:58+00:00): PRNG to jest oficjalne źródło.
Wiele nazw jest tam nieaktualnych a nawet błędnych, stąd też ich weryfikacja jest pożądana.
Zalecenie niekasowania bierze się stąd, że jest ryzyko ponownego importu lub ręcznego dodania na podstawie PRNG.
Frans S (2022-04-05 10:23:49+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
your mappings of (round) buildings are often far oversized. Please map buildings more precise.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114178242
opendcc (2021-11-24 13:23:40+00:00): Hallo,

Du hast hier den gesamten landuse residential in Pfarrkirchen entfernt. Absicht?
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-11-29 00:00:09+00:00): Porque duplicou a rua braamcamp (destruindo rotas associadas) quando a mesma não tem nenhuma barreira física que divida os sentidos?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Frans S (2021-11-24 16:02:36+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114179602
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-05-27 19:33:49+00:00): Please, do not map nonexisting carriageways.

Do not create separate _link where there is no physical separation.

See http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=114179662
Frans S (2021-11-24 16:01:03+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
E: Buildings not squared.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114179683
Frans S (2021-11-24 15:58:58+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not allways in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
E: Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114180001
Frans S (2021-11-24 15:57:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
E: Buildings not squared.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into the mapping.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114180008
Frans S (2021-11-24 15:53:42+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped.
PLease do not connect nodes of buildings to each other.
 Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114180104
Frans S (2021-11-24 15:52:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
B: Overlapping buildings.
C: Collecting multiple buildings and mapped as 1 building.
D: Connected nodes of different buildings of objects.
E: Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114180126
Frans S (2021-11-24 15:50:17+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114180301
Frans S (2021-11-27 09:45:20+00:00): Hi again
About highways
Please tag roads in urban areas as 'residential' rather than 'unclassified'
Please read this wiki about tagging highways in African Countries.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa#Typology_of_Road_Network_in_African_countries
Vivek Dumre (2023-12-07 09:31:02+00:00): Thanks sir for you appreciation and this reference documents have help me a lot in past.
Frans S (2023-12-07 10:28:08+00:00): Hello again.
I see that you are mapping with JOSM.
Are you familiar with the building tool?
When you map buildings, (round or rectangular) you automatically map nice 90 degr, or round buildings with this tool
If you are not using this, this webpage will help you further.
https://learnosm.org/en/josm/josm-more-plugins/
Best regards and keep mapping
Vivek Dumre (2023-12-07 10:54:40+00:00): Thank you sir for your reply . It was my mistake back then when i was in beginner phase.
But at the moment i have developed good skills in mapping and validation.
Гарыня (2021-12-01 15:21:52+00:00): "Как highway=service обозначаются проезды во дворах, жилых массивах, ... — все те, которые не предназначены для сквозного движения транспорта"
Очевидно, что эта дорога как раз обеспечивает сквозной проезд к "Фиолент Виладж".  highway=unclassified кажется более правильным тегом.
wireguy (2021-11-24 13:27:20+00:00): jpotas: You temporarily deleted the boundary, but you should be reverting your changeset to get it back.   Just redrawing the missing piece is loosing all the history of that segment.  You also did not add it to the correct relations, so now Greenburgh, Greenville, and Yonkers boundaries are broken.
t_ja (2021-11-24 19:45:58+00:00): Opäť ďalšie dve adresy odmazané a pritom tie novozakreslené budovy sú takmer rovnaké ako tie pôvodné, čo boli ozmazané. Takže príspevok tohto changesetu pre OSM je skôr záporný :(
EMREOYUN (2021-11-25 18:54:25+00:00): OpenStreetMap'e katkılarınızdan dolayı hem size, hem de üniversitenize teşekkür ederiz. #AnkaradanSelamlar
maraf24 (2021-11-24 13:02:38+00:00): Jaka nazwa?
tm261700 (2021-11-25 07:51:41+00:00): To tak jest jak kilka elementów się ruszy i nie zapisuje się obiektów na bieżąco. Oczywiście komentarz dotyczył obiektu "Osiedle Broniewskiego"
Luzandro (2021-11-25 16:35:27+00:00): Hallo,

vor dem Umbau gab es auf der Laxenburger Straße Richtung Achau ortseinwärts einen einseitigen 70er. Kann gut sein, dass dieser mit dem neuen Straßenverlauf komplett entfernt wurde, dann müssten auch die maxspeed:forward entfernt werden

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/156906030
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/84620117
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/971306501
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/572698291
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114181503
SomeoneElse (2021-11-24 16:27:25+00:00): Hello Shanmugamrsd,
Something has gone wrong here - this service road is not joined to the road at either end!
Looking at the imagery, it actually looks more like a split at the end of Lake Encino Drive rather than a distinct service road.
Best Regards,
Andy
Shanmugamrsd (2021-11-26 04:28:35+00:00): Hello Andy,
first of all thank you for sharing the error which I had done,  will redo the work which I have made a error so please unblock my account so that I can continue my work as per your guidance.
 Thank you
SomeoneElse (2021-11-27 02:10:44+00:00): Hello Shanmugamrsd,
You were free to continue as soon as you'd read that message, that's why https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5473 says "Ended about 22 hours ago".  However, please do answer the questions that I asked there - reply to the other comments at https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12711928 as well as this one, and also could you please explain your workflow? Something like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006046175 simply makes no sense.  Also,  editing as part of a wider project, and if so, what project is that?
Best Regards,
Andy
Patchanka (2023-02-26 19:49:31+00:00): c'est encore moi !
Une règle essentielle d'OSM est de ne pas mettre de nom si l'élément n'a pas de nom (un nom propre en fait).
Ici "terrain stabilisé" semble plutôt être une description qu'un nom propre.
Je me permet donc de le supprimer.
bonne soirée
Frans S (2021-11-24 15:47:54+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114181855
AntMadeira (2021-12-02 19:52:36+00:00): Olá, RazorWind.

Vi que alteraste todas estas localidades para vilas. Podes explicar em que te baseaste para o fazer?

Cumprimentos,
António Madeira.
hatul (2021-11-24 22:48:22+00:00): מחקת בטעות חלק מהיחס של שביל ישראל
zstadler (2021-11-25 08:01:11+00:00): תיקנת?
hatul (2021-11-25 08:03:39+00:00): כן, יחד עם המון נתקים אחרים בשביל ישראל
hatul (2021-11-25 08:04:36+00:00): יעזור מאוד אם אפשר לכתוב סקריפט שמתריע על נתקים בשביל.
zstadler (2021-11-25 08:16:29+00:00): הטוב ביותר שיש לי להציע הוא הדף

http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=282071&noCache=true&_noCache=on
hatul (2021-11-25 08:22:31+00:00): עוזר חלקית, כי אין אפשרות להתרעות והוא בודק רק אם הכול מחובר. אם חיברו בטעות עוד קטע הוא לא יודיע.
Frans S (2021-11-24 15:47:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

A: Buildings not accurate drawn.
E: Buildings not squared.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114182372
Frans S (2021-11-24 15:43:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
E: Buildings not squared. Most buildings have fair 90 degree corners. Square them with the Q key




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114182381
Leo Slager (2021-11-24 23:40:12+00:00): Dag sebastic,
Met het verslepen van de adresnode heb je ook het hele gebouw uit zijn verband getrokken.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=114182497
Het gebouw heb ik weer in oorspronkelijke vorm teruggezet.
sebastic (2021-11-25 05:38:26+00:00): Bedankt voor de building correctie, bij het downloaden van de adress node waren de gerelateerde ways niet mee gekomen.
Irma IRM-ED (2022-12-20 06:24:03+00:00): Hi Konmuang. Your edit looks awesome, but the water body (id 1005859462) due crossing with highway.(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1005859462)
 If you have any other suggestion, please let me know (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143787871). Thank you.
Dary Raihanah IRM-ED (2022-12-21 02:21:12+00:00): Hi Konmuang
thank you for your mapping contribution. 
I found the water body (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/548344937) that you mapped crosses a track road (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/548344941) causing a warning. 
Maybe do you know whether there is a bridge or not on the road? or is there a culvert in water body?
Could you please modify the water body? so it doesn't cause a warning crossing highway/waterway. If you have any other suggestions, please let me know. Thank you.

(https://maproulette.org/challenge/30161/task/143789137)
Konmuang (2022-12-21 02:35:48+00:00): Yeah maybe you can seperate the water body into two (the "water" is a ditch dug out for agricultural use). But I can't do that myself right now because I am on mobile.
Thanks.😺
Dary Raihanah IRM-ED (2022-12-21 02:45:25+00:00): Okay, I will modify the water body myself. Thank you so much. Happy mapping!
Frans S (2021-11-24 16:25:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114182663