piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
3vivekb (2017-12-15 17:00:37+00:00): I don't know this area, but would say there is only one real path here?  Is the bike and pedestrian path separte?  Maybe we should just add bike tags to the existing path.
IcyMidnight (2017-12-15 20:14:12+00:00): They are right next to each other without any barriers, but there is a pedestrian lane and a cycle lane. I wasn't sure how to represent that so I did this. If you think the other way is better you can change it and I won't be offended :)

Here's a picture for reference: https://i.imgur.com/V2Ursdu.jpg green is the cycleway, red is the pedestrian way.
Minh Nguyen (2017-12-15 21:03:46+00:00): Since there’s no physical separation, a single way would be more accurate. But you could use bicycle:lanes and foot:lanes tags to say which side to walk or bike on.
Minh Nguyen (2017-12-15 21:05:07+00:00): And colour:lanes while we’re at it. :-P There’s more information about lane-specific tags at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes
IcyMidnight (2017-12-16 02:23:55+00:00): Made the changes you suggested. Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:48:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:50:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
FreedSky (2018-02-16 07:03:42+00:00): 不要黏在一起
user_5359 (2017-12-14 05:11:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use for addr:state the two uppercase character abbrevation for the states.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:51:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
user_5359 (2017-12-14 05:02:43+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You added to buildings and one (!) addresses to one residential relation. I correct this mistake.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:47:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
viloan (2017-12-14 04:45:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
marcioaguiar (2017-12-15 15:27:00+00:00): Olá Filipe! 

Adicionei as ruas novamente. Tudo bem ser uma rua dentro do condomínio, contanto que estejam mapeadas com access:private, que indica que o acesso é privado.
Richard (2019-09-16 16:05:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 74540505 where the changeset comment is: Revert changing through roads to driveways
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:48:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
viloan (2017-12-14 05:04:33+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2017-12-14 05:19:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mweper (2017-12-14 12:22:39+00:00): Hola Fabio. ¿Que quisiste marcar aquí?
-
Como esta etiquetado ahora, es un «gran almacén» (https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grandes_almacenes), llamado «Depto». En el caso que quieras añadirlo como un «edificio de departamentos», se debe etiquetar con https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:building%3Dapartments y si no tiene nombre propio, no debes añadírselo porque ya queda explicito en la categoría.
-
Cualquier duda, me puedes contactar. Saludos
imperialmog (2017-12-14 13:27:40+00:00): It wasn't for that. It was actually an old area related to Archgrounds construction that should have been deleted instead of changed to park when completed. The park was already there.
3vivekb (2017-12-15 16:50:12+00:00): This looks good though in general I don't like to connect ways to areas.
3vivekb (2017-12-15 16:51:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
3vivekb (2017-12-15 16:54:32+00:00): This isn't really the right way to do this.  the Crossing node should stay on the road.  I fixed it here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54658940
elgolfo (2017-12-20 13:48:36+00:00): Hallo Klange66,

hast du vielleicht noch ein paar weitere Details (Öffnungszeiten, Webseite etc) für das Café ? 
Schau mal hier, was man da sonst noch an hilfreichen Infos taggen kann: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=cafe?uselang=de

Grüße
Moritz
DD1GJ (2017-12-14 08:11:14+00:00): Hallo Christian, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Leider ist das Bing-Luftbild in dem Gebiet um mehr als 3 Meter verschoben. Am genauesten in Rheinland-Pfalz ist derzeit Esri, da dies das Luftbild der amtlichen Landesvermessung ist. Sei mir also bitte nicht böse, dass ich deshalb Deine Verschiebungen rückgängig mache, denn so wie es vorher war, hatte es sehr genau gestimmt.

Viele Hinweise für einen problemlosen Einstieg in OSM findest Du im Tutorial:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Viele Grüße und noch viel Spass mit OSM, Joachim
eggie (2017-12-14 07:32:00+00:00): Oke.. nuttige aanvulling... De brug moet wel op het land beginnen en niet op het randje van het water. foot=yes en bicycle=no hoeft niet op een wandelpad.
eggie (2017-12-14 07:37:07+00:00): De brug heb ik losgemaakt van het water en access=no en foot en bicycle verwijderd. Beter nooit met access no beginnen.
Hier de defaults voor de Nederlandse situatie... http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#The_Netherlands
Digne (2017-12-14 14:16:42+00:00): Hallo Geertjuh,

Ik zag dat je je changeset nagekeken wilde hebben, dus bij deze.

Het ziet er goed uit. Ik vroeg mij alleen af waarom de "width" negatief is.
Geertjuh (2017-12-14 15:36:15+00:00): Ik bedoelde eigenlijk dat het pad smaller is dan 1m. Ik heb het nu aangepast naar '1'
viloan (2017-12-14 06:29:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Digne (2017-12-14 14:29:27+00:00): Hallo Geertjuh,

Ik zag dat je je changeset nagekeken wilde hebben, dus bij deze.

Nog even een aanvulling op mijn andere opmerking: Ik zie dat de naam van dit pad net niet gelijk is aan de naam van het fietspad (Kerkdèkske vs. Kerkdekske).
Digne (2017-12-14 14:30:59+00:00): Ik heb verder niks op te merken, maar even een reactie zodat deze niet meer open staat.
eggie (2017-12-14 07:44:05+00:00): review request: Beter niet met access=no beginnen. Dan kan fot=yes er ook af. Mag je er niet fietsen/brommeren dan vehicle=no toevoegen. Je ziet ook op de kaart dat de weg niet echt goed rendert want hij staat op slot. Verander je het zelf.
eggie (2017-12-14 07:57:53+00:00): Bij een path dus iets meer accesstags dan bij een footway.
Een footway heeft het bekende blauwe ronde bord. In alle andere gevallen is het een path, maar daar staat vaak een bordje met de regels. bv (brom) fietsen verboden. Bij path kun je dan taggen vehicle=no  fot hoeft nooit genoemd te worden.. is default.
Dit was je edit: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=54615809
eggie (2017-12-14 07:40:39+00:00): Je kunt ook access=no weglaten en dan vehicle=no toevoegen. Dat houdt elk verkeer tegen. foot=yes kand er dan af.
access=no is eigenlijk een wit bord met rode rand. Staat dat hier?
Verander je het zelf?
4004 (2017-12-14 22:11:59+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты
важное здание, поэтому важно правильно его отметить - название это хорошо, но нужно еще и метку соответствующую. я добавлю
Baloo Uriza (2017-12-14 16:01:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 54628332 where the changeset comment is: Removing SEO spam, please don't add this again without doing it right, spammer.
freeExec (2017-12-14 07:31:48+00:00): "Правила не читай - скорей делай".
Копировать нельзя, а ваши изменения придётся в топку.
Alexander-II (2017-12-14 07:31:52+00:00): Здравствуйте. Остановитесь, пожалуйста. То, что вы делаете - вандализм данных и идет в разрез с принятыми соглашениями о наименовании улиц. Эти ваши правки в любом случае будут отменены.
deepthi1 (2019-03-07 05:24:36+00:00): "Hi  Hanif Al Husaini,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Jakarta, came across way 436363917 classified as 'Secondary' and  way 436363876 as 'Unclassified'.We are getting a classification gap. 

Please look into these and share your thoughts on this. Thanks in advance."
viloan (2017-12-14 07:38:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-03-05 23:26:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 56918492 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematic additions in Turkey, including duplicated buildings
user_4493657 (2017-12-14 10:38:47+00:00): Cześć. Nie przypominam sobie, żeby w tym miejscu widział taki duży budynek.
artofcourse (2017-12-14 11:22:37+00:00): hej, bo to nie budynek tylko teren, wywalić?
user_4493657 (2017-12-14 11:46:12+00:00): usunięcie building=yes z obszaru powinno doraźnie pomóc. 
Osobiście wszystkie dane placówki dałbym na budynek onaczony jako "Dom Pomocy Społecznej", a obsar zielony oznaczyłbym jako las, lub/i park, a ten obszar poniżej ul. Parkowej wyglada na obszar rekreacyjny https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:landuse%3Drecreation_ground
user_4493657 (2017-12-14 11:50:11+00:00): widzę, że już poprawiłeś.
artofcourse (2017-12-14 11:52:18+00:00): zrobione, teren od ul. Kasztanowej na północy do ul. Lipowej na południu to park w Nowej Wsi, teren od ul. Parkowej do ul. Lipowej pełni także funkcje rekreacyjne (boisko, scena) ale wszystko w obszarze parku, zatem jakoś dodatkowo ten obszar wyedytować?
user_4493657 (2017-12-14 12:05:41+00:00): Jest ok. Myślę, ze możesz obszar poniżej ul. Parkowej oznaczyć dodatkowo jako landuse=recreation_ground wyrysować boiska itd:. bez zmieniania obszaru parku.
user_4493657 (2017-12-14 12:14:06+00:00): Coś podobnego jak tutaj https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/480916750#map=18/52.71192/16.36689 obszar parku czega aż zostanie zagospodarwoany przez np: trawę, drzewa, ścieżki, żywopłoty, rzędy drzew, rzeźby, fontanny, oczka i wiele wiele innych obiektów.
andergrin (2017-12-14 09:07:13+00:00): Випрямляйте будинки, виділивши будинок і натиснувши S, також будинки треба малювати по даху а потім вирівнювати по землі, переносячи полігон.
МГЗп-171БездєткоДіана (2017-12-14 10:20:35+00:00): Спасибо
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-12-20 00:48:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65626832 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a couple of thousand mostly unnamed, mostly tourist info MAPS.ME points.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
chris66 (2017-12-14 10:28:18+00:00): Friedrichstraße ist verschoben.
ionr (2017-12-14 10:53:51+00:00): Ist korrigiert ;)
Digne (2017-12-16 13:44:48+00:00): Ik zou dit iets anders aanpakken. Permissive gaat er vanuit dat navigatie er doorheen mogelijk is, maar op elk moment opgeheven kan worden. Ik zou voor de tag private gaan hier. 

Daarnaast zou ik geen algemene access gebruiken, maar alleen voor motor_vehicle=private. Dan gebruikt hij voor alles wat je niet specificeert de standaardwaarden en hoef je dus ook niet bicycle=yes toe te voegen. Het is immers een fietspad, natuurlijk mogen daar fietsen op. ;)
JHvW (2017-12-16 15:59:18+00:00): OK, ik heb het (denk ik) aangepast. Inmiddels heb ik ook JOSM geïnstalleerd en ga ik eerst experimenteren met "photomappen", kijken of ik dat kan gebruiken.
Digne (2017-12-16 16:13:43+00:00): Succes met JOSM! Er zijn veel meer mogelijkheden maar het kost allemaal wat meer tijd om het te begrijpen dan iD.

Ik had nog twee dingetjes: Ten eerste, zit het obstakel nog niet vast aan de weg en op de weg zitten nog andere tags. 

Ten tweede, als je access = yes zet, zeg je in feite dat alle groepen er langs mogen. Met individuele tags kan je dan een uitzondering maken. Maar je dus hoeft niet voor individuele groepen nog eens te bevestigen dat het mag. Dus met access=yes is bicycle=yes overbodig. ;)
mysterytriogf (2017-12-15 12:33:47+00:00): dont remove the houses. I added them to contribute to the pokemon map
Constable (2017-12-15 12:46:11+00:00): hi there, thanks for your message. I'm not here to delete your edits without any good reason, I'm here to improve the map as well.
Here you can see the details of this edit http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=54617604
As you can see I did delete just a small part of them and the reason is because they were not properly mapped. The School was tagged as industrial, which is definitely not correct, and the other buildings were just too sloppy.
The 99% of buildings need to be squared (select the building and press "s" on your keyboard), you are supposed to do it before saving your edits, plus you should have used some more appropriate tags for those buildings which I removed.
Here you can find the right building tag
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buildings

If you need some help I can help you out, that's for sure, I'm not here to start a nonsense/stupid/time wasting edit war.
Please make sure you respect the basic rules of mapping and I'll help you out map this whole area if you'll need some help.
Feel free to have a look at the beginner guide http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners%27_guide

Other than that you should understand that pokemon uses a 6 months old version of this map, so, editing here is not going to affect the map you see when playing pokemon. At the same time, OSM mappers are supposed to add only real elements, so you're not allowed to map things because you would like to have them in the game. That would be called vandalism and your edits would be removed.
Please remember to add only real elements.

Feel free to ask if you need some help
Thank you
Cheers
mysterytriogf (2017-12-15 12:51:07+00:00): Question: Do you play Pokemon Go and they confirmed they would update the OSM map in the future. Thanks for your help :)
Constable (2017-12-15 12:56:21+00:00): Hi, no I don't play Pokemon, I'm just a mapper here and I'm seeing a ton of players which signed up and started vandalizing our map because they want to let pokemons spam near their houses. I'm pretty much double checking all the suspicious/pokemon related edits, in order to make sure that our map stay true to reality.
freebeer (2017-12-15 16:01:45+00:00): Hi mysterytheatregf,
One very helpful tip I can give you to make your map editing much better is to use a different background image.
In your area, and for that matter, the entire state of Connecticut is covered by highly-detailed aerial imagery with I believe 10cm resolution, far better than what you use.
This is available as ESRI World Imagery or similar.  The details of how you select that in your editor I cannot say (perhaps change background).
With this you can zoom in two additional steps to zoomlevel 21, so that a building can occupy your entire screen.
Then you can see far more detail (I believe 16 times linearly) than in the Bing default background, and you can trace things much more precisely.
.
That alone would help you avoid the problem of a house and a garage and a pool ending connected -- I separated the pool and made it match the background as a proper rectangle, but that was not a trivial task; Constable had less patience to correct the joined buildings, when it is easier to delete them and redraw them from a better background.
.
Keep in mind this is not the Pokemon map, it is a general OpenStreetMap map used by thousands of applications, as well as numerous professional businesses, emergency services, and your Pokemon is but one, and the only one for which having absolutely correct data is not the ultimate goal.
.
And this is why I gave the correct tagging of a pool to all the items you had called lakes, as well as better positioned them.
Drawing a cornfield first as a woods, then changing that to be a park, is fake data, which we do not accept because it is clear that it is an agricultural field.
In short, work on mapping carefully (I still have room for improvement) and always map reality correctly, and we will welcome your participation.
thanks!
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-29 14:31:14+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=ra-men
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3640025509/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=ramen
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
tourtoglou (2017-12-14 08:44:23+00:00): There is a cloud that does not allow clear  visibility.
marczoutendijk (2019-07-19 13:56:23+00:00): Hi,
You have used place=place for Unterm Dorf. 
Maybe you meant place=locality?
See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Place
plettman (2019-07-19 14:02:54+00:00): Correct, thank you - it's corrected!
eggie (2017-12-14 10:55:02+00:00): Ook hier komt de naam nu twee keer voor. Die op het gebouw zelf zou ik er af halen. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=54619231
viloan (2017-12-14 09:44:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
santamariense (2018-01-07 05:02:47+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/54619242
BAK365 (2017-12-14 12:40:33+00:00): Die Adresse von node 1783692935 (Oberdorf, Näfels) war vorher korrekt. Wieso hast du das geändert?
Zverik (2017-12-14 12:45:53+00:00): Are you sure? I don't see Oberdorf street anywhere near.
Zverik (2017-12-14 12:47:12+00:00): (I've reverted the changes to the node)
rarad74 (2017-12-14 18:38:06+00:00): Hello. Maybe you will forward this problem to developers of maps.me which are very uncooperants when it comes about their bad developed app. Alot of damages are done daily with their app because of lack of possibility to add housenumbers to nodes. Users try to put housenumbers on any poi that comes handy.