piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Yuri Paris Fonseca (2015-06-12 12:15:15+00:00): é uma pequena nascente mesmo! fica embaixo de um pedregulho, de onde escorre um filete de água, talvez um waterway=brook, mas que não vai muito longe por causa das construções.
na região existiam umas 6 nascentes, mas foram sendo cobertas por casas. hoje tem só 2 nascentes, e eu fui lá com um grupo identificar com placas as nascentes.
fotos da caminhada (a nascente fica atrás do cara com megafone): https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.909628729075650.1073741827.411357108902817&type=3
você conversou com a angelica tedesco, professora do ifes, no outro dia, não foi? ela é uma das orientadoras do projeto em que colaboro, o Mapa do Bem.
Skippern (2015-06-12 13:44:02+00:00): Bom, se voce consigo mapear o córrego saindo da fonte, mesmo se pequeno ajudaria bom, talvez dar para achar onde entrando um córrego maior nos dados do Prefeitura? Eu ja tem todos os shapefiles no meu computador, e adicionando dados ao poucos. (esses fonte nascentes não ha nos dados do prefeitura)
Yuri Paris Fonseca (2015-06-19 18:08:06+00:00): A água dele é captada pela família que mora no terreno, sendo armazenada num poço dentro da casa deles. Devo marcar o caminho que a água faz até a casa? São uns 5 metros.
Yuri Paris Fonseca (2015-06-19 18:08:24+00:00): Não existe registro oficial desta nascente.
Skippern (2015-06-19 18:31:05+00:00): Se isso e caso melhor coloque isso no tag description=
EugenyN (2015-08-08 22:59:29+00:00): трилунная ? офигеть название.
keder (2015-08-10 08:56:33+00:00): Да, я их из генпланов беру
Socks (2015-06-10 22:37:00+00:00): This is NOT a misconception that has led to the A420 being tagged this way, but the result of consensus being reached in the OSM community on the mailing lists. Much of the editing done in this area today needs to be wound back, and only redone once the changes have been approved by the community.

Please please engage with the other editors in your area before making changes like this.
Kamion (2015-06-10 20:20:43+00:00): Sorry, my bad.
IknowJoseph (2015-06-11 10:31:47+00:00): "but if it shows up wall in the maps as a twoparttime deadends with turning circles for delivary lorries, cars and vans ok."

Tagging for the renderer is uncool. Please don't worry about how it shows up in the maps if you're having to draw something that doesn't reflect reality. Could you have used some better tagging on existing ways, for example?
maraf24 (2015-06-10 22:03:04+00:00): Why are you doing this?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Examples
futuretap (2015-06-11 07:58:13+00:00): Sorry, I wasn't aware of the 24/7 syntax.
Hedaja (2015-12-14 23:25:02+00:00): seems like the names are rendered now and the temporary nodes can be deleted
waldhans (2015-06-17 08:10:09+00:00): Thank's for destroying the boundary DE/NL! Can you tell why you did this? The boundary was defined by the most precise informations, and you changed it without checking or asking into something. What source did you use?

If possible, revert the changes ASAP.
sebastic (2015-06-17 08:49:44+00:00): > Thank's for destroying the boundary DE/NL!

Thanks for your constructive feedback. Your passive aggressive stance is very motivating.

> Can you tell why you did this?

Because I maintain the administrative boundaries of the Netherlands using the official government open data.

Every month they release a new dataset of which I incorporate the administrative boundary changes into OpenStreetMap. If you'd have checked my contribution history you would see that.

But then you don't come over as someone who investigates an issue before shouting at others.

> The boundary was defined by the most precise informations, and you changed
> it without checking or asking into something. What source did you use?

I don't need permission of anyone to update the Dutch administrative boundaries. I'm very capable of doing that myself.
 
> If possible, revert the changes ASAP.

Why didn't you describe the problem that has arisen since I've updated the boundaries. What has exactly broken?

Did you connect non-boundary objects to the boundary perhaps, that are now mis-formed due to moved nodes?

I'm not going to revert my changes, and if someone else does I will revert those changes. If my boundary changes broke something I'll fix that, but so far I've not heard anything concrete, just some German shouting at his fellow mappers who clearly isn't aware of common courtesy to his peers, nor to common guidelines incorporated in the Code of Conduct draft.

Can you please change your attitude to a constructive approach so we can fix any issues that may have arisen?

Shouting at people will not make them want to help you.
naoliv (2015-06-12 03:32:57+00:00): Pedro, você deslocou um grande trecho da Ananguera nessa sua edição
naoliv (2015-06-12 03:39:44+00:00): Pedro, a mesma coisa aqui.
Acho que você tentou realinhar um trecho da rodovia mas acabou deslocando ela inteira
Govanus (2015-06-11 14:58:51+00:00): Where is the list?

I've received complaints about this road being misrepresented.
Ordence Survey and Goverment Departments local and National treat this as a major road.
It has been rebuilt twice this mellenium because it has become worn out with traffic use.
It has so many vehicals that it can still have a traffic queue stretching from Longwall to Turl Street in the rush hour when the through traffic restictions are still in place.
Its the main 24hr spine route for two of the lorry access zones. 
Its wide enough to take five lanes of traffic and two more are dedicated to masses of local student tourist pedestians.
It collects all the bus routes from the west side of the city to run down it and around and down St. Aldate's.
As the Buses act as the Citys mass transit system and the majority of people working and living in the city avoid driving to the City Centre as it is officialy discoraged through inflated parking charges and a rejection of additional private parking provisons such as adding an underground car park to a college building when its not been already...

In what sort of way is it *not* a major primary road???

I can understand that a simple representaion of a way running like there is no time restrictions on minority users like cars, but I have spent 7 hours drawing features to highlight and premote the rendering of the traffic gate the runs for only about 10 meters about the width of the carrageway there.
Unlike in the past when it was a single line of one colour I left it delibratly as a tertiary middle (when it should be the same as the rest) to delibratly force renders to make it look different to map readers.  So on this basis the Note tags should be and had had a bit more time would have been removed for being out of date.  I stopped short of using area:highway tags to show the area of a central reservation runnig from the gate to just beyond Queens Lane.  For the reasons noted on the notes entered into OSM at that place.

I had warned these routes were likly to be reupgraded when I got the Ref's reentered on these roads last time they went as they are used in some signs and directions espcially for lorry drivers whose delivery diagrams include them.

So where do I have to take the argument to it mentions a list but not where to find it..
Aurimas Fišeras (2015-06-27 06:57:38+00:00): Sveikas, braižant Lietuvoje reikėtų naudoti „Lithuania - NŽT ORT10LT“, o ne Bing kaip foną. Nes dabar viskas buvo pasislinkę per kelis metrus.
Rolis666 (2015-06-28 17:49:59+00:00): Aš tuo metų kaip dariau šį ruoža  NŽT ORT10LT nebuvo pasirinkime, būna kad kaartais prapuola iš sarašo  NŽT ORT10LT, nežinia dėl ko tai vyksta ar bugas koks nors įsivelia.
Aurimas Fišeras (2015-06-28 17:55:28+00:00): Supratau. Pasienio ruože ne visuomet automatiškai aptinka, kad čia dar Lietuva.
Tokiu atveju paslenki žemėlapį gilyn į Lietuvą, kur atsiranda „Lithuania - NŽT ORT10LT“, jį pasirenki ir grįžti atgal į pasienį.
aharvey (2018-07-01 09:48:52+00:00): Hey it doesn't look like there's any track out to the lookout you added here, do you think it still makes sense to show it on the map? Also someone imported another one from the LPI Basemap do you know if there should be two?
Estela Mestre (2015-06-13 01:47:46+00:00): Escuela primaria pública
Nidia Elder (2015-06-11 04:37:57+00:00): Pastelería, panadería Harispe
maning (2015-06-11 04:26:27+00:00): Please go ahead and map it! :)  Keep on mapping nathan!
MAPconcierge (2016-12-08 00:53:01+00:00): ノードID 3587049885 が place=neighbourhood になっていますが、名前がありません。誤入力でしょうか？
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3587049885
5m4u9 (2015-06-12 07:01:34+00:00): Great!!! Thank you for improve the map of Potosí in Bolivia.

We have very few local mappers in Bolivia and this effort is wellcome! :)

Happy mapping!
kartler175 (2015-06-15 16:12:56+00:00): http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.56104&lat=49.68109&zoom=18&opacity=1.00&overlays=unconnected_major1,unconnected_major2,unconnected_major5,duplicate_ways

3 Straßen übereinander, verschleier durc verknüpfen von landuse- mit Straßenpunkten. Wiesen und Äcker mitten auf der Straße: entspricht nicht der Realität, Mappen für den Renderer
Aleksandr86Sever (2015-06-11 06:46:50+00:00): Здание общежития снесено!
St Paul Pipeworks (2015-06-11 06:55:44+00:00): St Paul Pipeworks can be found at University Ave W 2161. The following is offered: General Contractors. The entry is present with us since Jul 25, 2013 and was last updated on Oct 29, 2014. In St Paul there are 35 other General Contractors.
d1g (2015-06-11 08:06:20+00:00): Так значительно лучше. Водители теперь могут уступать дорогу людям находясь в жилых зонах, пешеходы видят свои зоны.

Без знаний красных линий города или полных знаний всех заборов, проходов, предприятий - не дорисовывайте "пустые" зоны Саратова.

https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CA%F0%E0%F1%ED%FB%E5_%EB%E8%ED%E8%E8
flohoff (2015-06-11 09:08:21+00:00): Hi,
ich habe mir dein Landuse mal angesehen. Ich würde insgesamt die flächen viel feingranularer machen. Und du hast da einiges als farmland drin was ich im Luftbild eher als meadow identifiziere. Und da sind dann auch flächen die durch gräben und knicks - da würde ich den landuse=farmland immer unterbrechen.

http://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/tmp/landuse.jpg

Ich gestalte das mal um.

Flo
flohoff (2015-06-11 09:29:27+00:00): Hier,

so in etwa würde ich das machen - Da sind ja wiesen dabei die haben Zäune - also zum landuse=meadow noch ein barrier=fence. Dann sind flächen ja durch Flußläufe unterbrochen - dann geht die fläche ja nicht durch etc ...

http://silicon-verl.de/home/flo/tmp/landuse-after.jpg

Flo
GerdP (2022-11-05 13:46:32+00:00): Moin!
Ich frage mich, ob die Adresse des Amphietheater Goldenstedt stimmen kann. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222301418
Bin drauf gestoßen, weil ich mich frage, wo genau der Fasanenweg aufhört und die Dohlenstiege anfängt. Die Hausnummer 13 sollte eher auf der anderen Seite von "Tiefer Weg" sein?
archie (2015-06-11 12:10:40+00:00): They do not? How should I tag depth data?
malcolmh (2015-06-11 12:18:39+00:00): No depth data, either spot soundings on on nodes, nor depth contours on ways should be put into the OSM database. If you want to contribute depth data, then see: http://depth.openseamap.org/ for details of the OpenSeaMap crowd-sourcing depth project.
d1g (2015-06-25 04:48:51+00:00): У роспечати всё верно было, building=retail это вообще любая торговая постройка:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352115998/history
d1g (2015-06-11 08:51:02+00:00): Конкретно здесь это не так критично, но в целом, таких правок следует избегать:

входы и поликлиники не меняют свои положения: если она слева в здании, то пусть будет в левой части. Если по центру - пусть будет по центру. У края - значит у определённого края.

Отображение значков не должно влиять на точность данных в OSM.

Для удобного каталога POI можно воспользоваться
http://openstreetmap.ru/
http://maps.sputnik.ru/
http://osmand.net/

Я пользуюсь последним, но редко.

Обычно я просто открываю карту - запоминаю и иду куда нужно.
adiatmad (2021-08-10 13:08:09+00:00): Halo, semoga Anda sehat selalu.

Apa artinya kode name=BGN123? Misal pada objek ini (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/352959956)

Salam hangat
DarkSwan_Import (2015-06-11 17:24:20+00:00): Hai aggiunto un percorso vuoto e un punto con solo il nome "archeopoint". Dovresti eliminare quel percorso errato e aggiungere al punto historic=archaeological_site. Inoltre sul sito hai messo .ti anzichè .it
Self-Perfection (2015-10-23 10:34:39+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы этой правкой добавили на дорогу https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48585249 адресные теги (addr:city=Москва
addr:housenumber=20
addr:street=улица Маршала Захарова).
Адрес это всё-таки свойство здания, иногда территории, но не дороги. Не надо так делать.
d1g (2015-06-11 09:43:42+00:00): Да, человек отличающий остановки 4 и 6 маршрутов это точно Саратовец.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3587523224
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3587523223

Добро пожаловать в OSM!
dj314d (2015-07-05 23:14:15+00:00): my first edits - foodpaths around my house
MKnight (2015-06-21 11:26:50+00:00): Meh.

Right changeset-comment: Fix some tiger:reviews
literan (2015-06-11 12:14:39+00:00): Правильные теги здесь будут такие: description=пожарный пруд
natural=water
water=pond

В name= можно ставить только имя собственное, если оно есть у пруда.
Allexnew (2015-06-11 11:54:42+00:00): Случайно удалил зону ПАТП. Жду отката.
fx99 (2015-06-13 06:12:09+00:00): Are you sure that you wanted to delete
relation 349006 , admin level 6, Provincia de Málaga ??
Rondom (2015-06-20 06:05:01+00:00): Hallo Rambo1453,
herzilich willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Ich freue mich jedes Mal wenn es mehr Leute  gibt, die sich um die Gegend kümmern!

In diesem Änderungssatz hast du eine Telefonzelle eingetragen. Hierfür hast du aber leider versehentlich den Node 2611450663 an dem die Ausfahrt vom REWE/ALDI-Einkaufszentrum auf die Niederkleiner Straße trifft, genommen und von seiner ursprünglichen Position (http://bit.ly/1K2rdcO Version #1) Richtung Bahnhof (http://bitly.com/1Rivmtu Version. 2) verschoben und ihn mit amenity=telephone versehen.

Dementsprechend sah dann natürlich auch die Karte aus: http://oi60.tinypic.com/24lpvmh.jpg
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=24lpvmh&s=8#.VYT_SEbuqV4

Ich hab den Node wieder an seine ursprüngliche Position zurückverschoben und das amenity=telephone gelöscht.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/32090122

Ich vermute, dass die Telefonzelle, die du eintragen wolltest, am Bahnhof steht. Da ich jedoch selber nicht mehr in der Gegend wohne, kann ich das nicht nachprüfen. Evtl. kannst du sie dann wieder ohne Unfälle eintragen ;-)

Gruß von weit weg,
Rondom
maraf24 (2015-06-11 23:37:22+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/134516705
Tu nie ma 2 pasów. Wynika to wprost z poprzedzających turn:lanes=left|through|through;right
Po minięciu skrętu w prawo zostaje  left|through|through. To są 3 pasy.
Skrzyżowanie jest tu wyrysowane symbolicznie, nie można się kierować tym, co widać na jezdni. Jak chcesz tu dać 2 pasy to trzeba dorysować lewoskręt.
lukaszww (2015-06-12 04:55:41+00:00): Ok zaraz poprawię.
maraf24 (2015-06-12 07:56:48+00:00): Tu się akurat da, ale bywają skrzyżowania gdzie na tych środkowych odcinkach w zależności skąd się jedzie wychodzą  zmienne ilości pasów. Ja celowo zostawiam puste. Niech sobie nawigacja sama policzy. OsmAnd (podobno) liczy pasy.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
SomeoneElse (2015-07-25 14:03:01+00:00): I wonder whether area:highway would be a better option for the highway areas here?  Broad Street's certainly wide enough to need the area representing, but I wonder how much area=yes confuses consumers?  The downside of course is that it wouldn't render on the standard map - it'd look something like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/98018013 .  For ref, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:area#Highway_areas is how the wiki says to do it now (which is what's there currently) and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/area:highway is the suggestion.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
mymau (2017-02-06 13:02:04+00:00): Hallo, 
die Kirche heißt St.-Jacobi-Kirche und befindet sich im Dreiecksplatz - Es gibt keinen alternativen Namen Sankt Jakobi. 
Die Kirche ist im Besitz des Ev.-Luth. Kirchenkreises Lübeck-Lauenburg. Von diesem Kirchenkreis ist auch die genaue Bezeichnung und Adresse
Zartbitter (2017-02-06 17:14:54+00:00): Danke für die Info. Ich wollte es gerade wieder korrigieren, habe aber gesehen, dass du es schon gemacht hast. Grüße.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2015-06-14 18:45:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 31968642 where the changeset comment is: Remove fictional edits by giannhs626. Some edits might be legitimate but due to the high amount of fictional content, all had to be reverted.
RafalR (2015-06-12 12:59:13+00:00): Dodałem kilka tagów do dodanego punktu, będzie lepiej widoczny. Pozdrawiam
Vincent de Phily (2015-06-11 16:58:57+00:00): Some of these infos were perfectly adequate for OSM, so added them back. While at it, tweaked the geometry.

The tags also said that the street name is "new Dock Road", but that street doesn't seem to exist nearby. Is it the english name of "Bóthar na Long" maybe ? Worth checking.
Vincent de Phily (2015-06-11 17:00:23+00:00): Also, is Ce na Mara a different feature completely, or part of the hotel ?
DaCor (2015-06-11 17:43:21+00:00): Cé Na Mara is an apartment block. I haven't done a detailed survey so I cant be certain about where they overlap if they do at all
HarbourGalway (2015-06-12 08:39:23+00:00): Cé na Mara is the adjoining Apratment block.Separate to the Harbour Hotel. 

New Docks is the area just beside the hotel and we would always have referred to the street outside as New Dock Road. 
I can see from Google Maps that that is referred to as Bóthar na nDuganna, which is the Irish for Dock Rd.