piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2021-08-27 07:21:47+00:00): Dag RRensen... Je kunt beter surface=grass toevoegen, want er ligt nu een vlak landue=grass op een ander vlak landuse=grass.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-08-27 07:23:19+00:00): Er liggen nu vier vlakken landuse=grass over elkaar heen. Denk dat de buitenste (De multipolygoon)  genoeg is. 
gr eggie
RRensen (2021-08-27 07:31:31+00:00): Ik ben de details van de golfbaan aan het intekenen. De anderen zijn veel meer de hoofdlijnen en een enkeling zelfs fout
eggie (2021-08-27 07:37:25+00:00): Oke... Het is als tip bedoeld.  
Wat ik bedoel is dat landuse=grass niet nodig is, want er ligt al landuse=grass..
Succes verder,
eggie
NieWnen (2021-08-27 13:23:14+00:00): Niestety ścieżka rowerowa w tej edycji została całkowicie usunięta :( 

Poprawię to później.
NieWnen (2021-08-28 02:37:04+00:00): Poprawione! Nawet udało mi się  przywrócić historię z czego jestem zadowolony :D W sumie dzięki Tobie, czegoś nowego się nauczyłem :P.

Jeszcze jedna rzecz, ale to odnośnie bardziej poprzedniej edycji i kolejnych. Dodałeś tory abandoned. Proszę staraj się korzystać z najnowszej wersji ortofotomapy, a najlepiej jak możesz odwiedzić miejsce osobiście w celu weryfikacji danych. Takie informacje są najcenniejsze. Ja wiem, że ta w wyższej rozdzielczości jest ładniejsza i więcej widać, ale no niestety, jak przełączysz na tą drugą, to widać od razu, że tam powstała droga, tunel i po torach nie ma ani śladu. Też już je usunąłem, Układu torów PKP nie weryfikowałem.

I nie zrażaj się przypadkiem przez moje komentarze :)
kokoimatsuchi (2021-08-28 06:58:33+00:00): Nie zrażam się, spokojnie. Dopiero zaczynam i takie wpadki się zdarzać będą. Ale z czasem ;)
aceman444 (2022-07-05 15:41:05+00:00): Hi, maxspeed changes from Orthophoto? That seems very dubious. Please provide real source of data. Also it seems some of the maxspeed changes are wrong. Also, there is now a mismatch, when you put maxspeed=70, then maxspeed:type cannot be "AT:rural". Standard rural speed is 100. The value should be "sign" as that is where the 70 comes from.
ZeLonewolf (2021-09-20 23:20:07+00:00): Hi, I'm not sure if you're aware of this, but you've broken a significant number of boundary relations, which have a missing "role".
amakarevich_lyft (2021-09-21 11:08:51+00:00): Hi, ZeLonewolf
 
My name is Artem, and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. Many thanks for fixing the broken relations. I’m so sorry I have missed them, and want to assure you it was not an intention to leave them this way.  I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience these changes may have caused. I have also corrected the missing member role for administrative boundary ‘Morgan Park’ relation in this changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111490123). I can promise I and my team will look deeper into the reasons why this has happened to avoid these kinds of mistakes in the future. Thank you so much for your contribution and valuable feedback!
 
Regards, Artem
ZeLonewolf (2021-09-21 11:29:34+00:00): Thanks!
zluuzki (2021-09-06 15:01:46+00:00): Hello, please make sure that your changesets don't cover the whole world. Something like that makes using the "History" tab pretty pointless. Thanks!
eggie (2021-08-27 10:16:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback... De regel lanes=0 kan beter verwijderd worden.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Rob_de_Vries (2021-08-27 11:46:46+00:00): Ok dank voor je email en de feedback. De lanes=0 is onbewust gegaan eigenlijk.  Dit heb ik nu verwijderd

Gr,
Rob
Mundilfari (2021-08-27 14:29:35+00:00): Hello - could you explain your thought process behind renaming the bus relations using a nonstandard pattern? The documentation in the wiki* says to use "Bus <ref>: <from> => <to>", not "<from> - <to>" for the route; and "Bus <ref>" for the route master (that's exactly how it was tagged before your change). 

Also, both, the northbound AND the southbound relation are called "Ashbury - Naperville Metra" now while one of them actually travels opposite direction - this looks bizarre, wouldn't you agree?

Finally, per the same documentation, role=stop appears to be discouraged for adding the stops to the relation; so I was wondering why you changed the role=platform to role=stop?

Thanks,

* https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Buses
Zol87 (2021-08-28 22:50:19+00:00): Sorry for the confusion, I was going by the official route name on Pace's website. As for stop vs platform, I was still using an older method of tagging. I will use platform from now on.
Mundilfari (2021-08-29 04:26:19+00:00): Hi - thanks for getting back on this. 
Per the wiki linked above, the official name is to be tagged separately (using the official_name=* tag) while the "normal" name is supposed to follow a standard pattern that does not necessarily match the official name.
MxxCon (2021-08-29 05:09:35+00:00): Hello.
I see that you created a new POI for this.
However, doing that contradicts https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element guideline.
Also there's a spelling mistake in the feature's name.
I thought in your previous comment you were going to add museum/gallery tags in the original POI rather than create a new one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110323389
TheFactFinder (2021-08-29 12:30:15+00:00): Ah sorry I had no idea. I’ll add both to the POI then
monotar (2021-09-04 12:40:43+00:00): Warum ist die Hauptstraße jetzt service???
srikmar (2021-09-06 10:31:38+00:00): Hi, 
Apologies for the incorrect edit that I have made. I have restored the incorrect changes to Secondary road. Thanks for looking into my edit. 
Regards,
srikmar
gileri (2021-08-28 12:16:57+00:00): Bonjour,

Dans ce changeset tu as changé le type de passage piéton sur le quai Claude Bernard, en indiquant qu'il n'est pas contrôlé par des feux.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8824715208

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:crossing=marked?uselang=fr

Les feux visibles en 2020 ont été retirés ? 

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=135026258662125

Merci

Éric
superrache (2021-08-31 07:03:35+00:00): Oui, je confirme après revérification en passant sur le terrain : pas ou plus de feu piéton ici.
gileri (2021-08-31 16:58:42+00:00): Ok merci !
jonrellim (2021-08-27 18:27:14+00:00): Hoi, sorry dat ik weer ff reageer. Je comment staat dat je het naar een éenrichtingsweg heb veranderd maar in de tags heb je de oneway tag juist verwijderd, maar de oneway:bicycle en oneway:moped laten staan. Wat moet het zijn? Volgens mij is dit wel een éenrichtingsweg namelijk. 

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=110324760
Wetterhorn (2021-08-27 19:37:54+00:00): Daar is iets foutgegaan, het juist een eenrichtingsstraat, met uitzonder voor (brom)fiets, verbeterd met edit 110356843, bedankt voor de oplettendheid! :-)
jonrellim (2021-08-27 19:50:23+00:00): Geen probleem ;) 

Map ze
eggie (2021-08-27 11:02:28+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
Alleen een name=... doet niet in OSM
U zult shop=???  zie wiki toe moeten voegen... of shop=yes bv. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shop

MVG
eggie
Leo Slager (2021-08-28 09:04:57+00:00): review:
Met deze changeset werden 26 bus routerelaties beschadigd.
Het opknippen van wegen zoals het stationsplein met 26 routerelaties brengt dus grote schade aan.
Als je dit soort wijzigingen serieus wilt doorvoeren stop dan met het gebruik van de editor iD  !!!
En stap over naar de editor JOSM.
Dan voorkom je dat soort grote beschadigingen !!!
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
gpvos (2021-09-20 16:27:44+00:00): Sorry, maar ik vind JOSM heel onprettig en onhandig in het gebruik. Ik zal voortaan proberen knippen te vermijden, maar als iD schade toebrengt moet die functionaliteit uit iD verwijderd of ontoegankelijk gemaakt worden, of iD zelf moet niet meer aangeboden worden.
iWowik (2021-08-31 07:41:49+00:00): День добрый!
1) Соблюдайте установленный порядок написания названий улиц
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3

Пример вашей ошибки:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/967064169/history

2) В name пишется только собственное название объекта, а не его тип или описание.
Пример вашей ошибки:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258183413

Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
eggie (2021-08-27 11:07:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback.. Weet je zeker dat hier een verkeerslicht aan het gebouw vastzit?
You are sure there is a traffic_light? 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mosstreet (2021-08-27 09:01:21+00:00): Последнее китайское предупреждение прежде чем я начну все ваши правки в откат отправлять
iWowik (2021-08-27 14:40:19+00:00): Некоторый ошибки я прправлял
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/109871740

Но , похоже, никакой реакции маппер не прявляет.
При внесении адресов ошибки.
В name пишется название объекта.
Номер дома никоеим образом им не является.

MasterGun!
Не вынуждайте других участников ваши правки исправлять или откатывать
mosstreet (2021-08-27 15:02:31+00:00): Не, читает он, я ему и в лс писал вообще не реагирует
julcnx (2021-08-27 11:57:14+00:00): If a road is on private land, highway=service would be more appropriate with the corresponding access tag (e.g. customers). If the main purpose of a road is access to agricultural fields, a highway=track would be the better choice. In most cases unclassified should be only used for long through traffic roads linking villages and other destinations along a public road. For more info:  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110326112
kellerk (2021-08-27 13:28:51+00:00): ok, agree
changed to track already
SekeRob (2021-08-27 08:36:39+00:00): Tagged inner areas as heath, but debatably could be tagged as grassland too were it not there's too much bush and low trees in them, likely evolving into full wood if humans leave it alone.
flother (2021-08-30 09:13:27+00:00): Hi averza,

Is this definitely a cyclepath only, and not a shared walking/cycling path?
artuuurs (2021-08-30 10:11:39+00:00): Hi! I think it is a shared path, and that's what is set currently - cycle&foot path.
flother (2021-08-30 10:24:01+00:00): OK, good to know. I changed the highway tag from cycleway back to path because that's JOSM's suggested tag for a shared path. I think some routers won't use cyclepaths for walking routes, even if they're tagged as foot=yes/designated.
artuuurs (2021-08-30 10:56:59+00:00): Interesting that the ID editor has Cycle&Foot Path choice. In Latvia and also other countries I've mostly seen this highway=cycleway being used for shared paths. Don't know what the correct way is.
flother (2021-08-30 12:17:50+00:00): That is interesting that JOSM and iD diverge and this.

I had a look at the wiki page for highway=cycleway and it says that there are indeed two tagging schemes in use:

highway=cycleway + foot=designated + segregated=no

highway=path + bicycle=designated + foot=designated + segregated=no 

It's definitely the second one that's used in Iceland (I couldn't find any examples of the first scheme using Overpass Turbo). This must be one of those country-by-country differences that are common on OpenStreetMap.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=cycleway
philippec (2021-08-27 13:17:32+00:00): Anzegem Vichtsestwg. AED.  Proficiat, dat is nr 1200.
Thibault Rommel (2021-08-27 13:23:27+00:00): Feest, nog vele duizenden te gaan ;P
Frans S (2021-08-28 14:35:34+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
You mapped a number of round buildings. and taged them as construction/
Since you can see that there is a roof on it you cannot tag it as construction. Just building=yes
btw. These objects are not round.
Best regards
Sakari_N (2023-10-27 13:38:40+00:00): Hi. This changeset seems wrong. There's no park in this location, you just edited a building into a park with weird name.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/143212232
Thibault Rommel (2021-09-10 08:23:13+00:00): Hallo.
Bestaat dit gebouw zelf wel nog?
Nu heb je ook het gebouw zelf verwijderd, enkel de omtrek met het huisnummer is blijven staan...
Muffin1953 (2021-09-10 11:09:35+00:00): Nee Thibault, alles is daar weg, ook de gebouwen. Het stuk is ondertussen ook verkocht. Momenteel wordt er niet op gebouwd noch is er een bouwvergunning aangevraagd. Mvg, Jacques Vanhaverbeke
Thibault Rommel (2021-09-10 11:11:36+00:00): Bedankt, ik doe het nodige.
julcnx (2021-08-27 11:44:09+00:00): Maybe "description "would be more appropriate instead of name?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110328181
Supaplex (2021-08-28 05:03:03+00:00): 那個，ML當編輯摘要有點太簡略了，我現在才意會過來是指苗栗，能不能再多打一些敘述，像是更細部到在那鄉鎮市之後的
Frans S (2021-08-27 10:23:57+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and  mapped
Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2sBest regards and keep mapping
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110328411
riysingh (2021-08-27 09:09:27+00:00): Hi,
I have made the edits in this changeset : 110328468 based on Driver feedback.

Regards,
riysingh.
Rom1 (2021-08-28 07:27:56+00:00): Doublon. Merci.
ALu68 (2021-08-27 20:47:00+00:00): The driveway can't cross the tram line at this position!
ALu68 (2021-08-27 20:58:38+00:00): You can see the kerb on bath side:  https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.391770731472036&lng=10.881652701015014&z=19.9&pKey=387455852430739&focus=photo
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.391770731472036&lng=10.881652701015014&z=19.9&pKey=1201105780350154&focus=photo
ALu68 (2021-08-27 21:00:39+00:00): Fixed: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/976898734#map=19/48.39214/10.88165
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110358739#map=15/48.3939/10.8808
xkuboini (2021-08-30 11:03:14+00:00): Hi,
 Thanks again for correcting my edits. Apologies for the delayed response. As said, I am new to OSM and this learning from you adds a great value to my edits. I will definitely make sure to not make such mistakes. Happy to learn from the community.
Regards,
xkuboini
ALu68 (2021-08-30 19:12:22+00:00): Thanks for your reply.

Happy mapping.
HirschKauz (2021-08-27 15:22:30+00:00): Hi Pango86, please be nice to your co-mappers and use a bit more descritpive CS-comments: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments 
Thank you and happy mapping ;-)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110328610
abakus_uploader (2021-08-27 22:33:24+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
NieWnen (2021-08-27 13:01:49+00:00): Ten kerb chyba nie jest poprawny? Raczej oznacza się go na krawężnikach (juz jest oznaczony) + w przypadku tego skrzyżowania, nie wszędzie jest lowered niestety.
Mordechai23 (2021-08-27 18:58:20+00:00): kerb się oznacza na highway=crossing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:kerb
i taki jest zwyczaj w Polsce. Nawet streetcomplete jak pyta o krawężnik, to dodaje do węzła z przejściem
NieWnen (2021-08-27 19:20:34+00:00): Hmm, rzeczywiście można oznaczyć go w przypadku uproszczenia.
Szczerze mówiąc to się z tym w Polsce nie spotkałem :P. 

Co do StreetComplete to akurat nie stanowi to dla mnie żadnego argumentu, bo powoduje on często  IMHO sporo zbędnych i czasem nieprawidłowych zmian, po których trzeba poprawiać i wymusza niektóre rzeczy (np. nawierzchnia CPRów, czy accessy).

Natomiast odnosząc się do wiki, które podesłałeś to mimo wszystko użycie kerb na węzłach przecinających drogę jest tutaj niewskazane: 

1. Jest to już uszczegółowione na krańcach krawężnika, więc duplikuje to częściowo dane i zmniejsza precyzje ich położenia.

2. Nie wszystkie krawężniki tutaj są tak samo zrobione, o czym wspomniałem w poprzednim komentarzu.

Ale dzięki za podesłanie, będę wiedział na przyszłość, że można i tak również tagować, a to poprawię pewnie w nocy, jak będę przeglądał całość tych edycji ze ścieżkami :D.
Rizki IRM-ED (2023-01-12 07:53:22+00:00): Hi _varman_
Thank you for contributing to OSM. I came across this area  https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/143358483 coordinat 10.5793889, 104.2887223 I found an issue crossing railway you made embankment with highways. After that, I checked various satellite imagery. I am not sure to add railway level crossing tag,  as armchair mapper. Based on history pewu you add embankment the railway and you have local knowledge in this area, I wonder If you have any street level information feel free to discuss or should. Would you mind coming and rechecking this issue? (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30168/task/145051781)
Cheers.
_varman_ (2023-01-12 09:54:20+00:00): Hi Rizki,

The crossings all along this railway line are very basic, and do not contain gates, flags, or lights. Much of the line is built on an embankment that sits higher than the surrounding land, and all small road/track crossings simply rise up the side of the embankment and then cross the lines. 

I am not an expert on the layer tags, but I would not consider the embankment to be a layer above the surrounding land, so none of this railway would have the layer tag, with the exception of bridges.

The point in question is where a larger road terminates and a small track crosses the line. I have updated the road and crossing marker accordingly.
Rizki IRM-ED (2023-01-13 00:20:10+00:00): Thank you for clarifying this, the information you provide is very helpful. Please feel free to ask any other questions you may have. Happy mapping!
Bear-in-a-box (2023-10-16 07:55:46+00:00): Hello,
why did you set access on "no"? is there any indication? I never saw it.
Tom Ameye (2023-10-21 16:28:59+00:00): Hi, this is already from 2 years ago. Seems access is "yes" for pedestrians, which is the right thing for this kind of trail.
Best regards,
Tom
Rom1 (2021-08-28 07:27:06+00:00): Re, j'ai également supprimé ce radar en doublon. Merci d'être vigilant sur les données déjà présentes.
tux67 (2021-11-25 07:38:42+00:00): Hi denguev1r,
handelt es sich bei diesem Weg um einen offiziell ausgeschilderten Weg / MTB Trail? 
Wenn keine Schilder vor Ort sind, ist das name tag nicht zu verwenden (ggf. ginge loc_name, wenn das wirklich keine selbsterdachte Strecke ist).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
Des Weiteren liegt die Strecke in einem Naturpark. https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8020256
Inoffizielle Trails sind dort eher nicht gern gesehen.

Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110330630
streckenkundler (2021-08-27 11:08:28+00:00): Hei, ist die Sperrung von https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/944711251 dauerhaft, oder mehr oder weniger kurzfristig wegen Bauarbeiten? Gibt es dann Info's wie lange? wenn es höchstens 1-2 Monate ist, würd ich da keine Sperrung eintragen... da bringt man sonst nur Routing-Anwendungen durcheinander...

Grüße,

Sven
cbffosler (2021-08-28 20:39:54+00:00): Hei, Sven, gut, dass jemand auf mich aufpasst.
Ich hatte nur ein 5 m Teilstück an der B 320 mit dem Teilstück bis zur CSE verbunden. Da war noch ein NO von der ehmaligen Baustelle drin.
Beste Grüße
Michael!
user_5239402 (2021-08-27 11:06:40+00:00): 안녕하세요.
철도 역이나 선로를 도로에 연결하지 말아주세요. 편집하기 힘들어 집니다. 교차하는 철도만 연결하시고 지하에 있거나 건물은 연결하지 말아주세요.
Hanan Tikveša (2021-08-27 13:49:18+00:00): Hi.
you had to connect this road to the tertiary road because it creates a warning about the road being disconnected.
i fixed your mistake in
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/110343860
Frans S (2021-08-27 10:19:55+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. This is a building only project.
You mapped a path ( use in rural areas highway=path)  This trace was already mapped but has an offset.
I removed your mapping of that path
Best regards
Frans S (2021-08-27 10:17:37+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and accurate mapped
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/110332317
rojjodo (2021-09-09 07:09:16+00:00): Hi,

You have updated Highland Park House with the name Rosebank. What is the rationale for this? Rosebank is the name of the service road entering the property, the house is still Highland Park House. (I'm staying there at the moment.)
Regards
Bob Dean
rmacd (2021-09-09 09:33:38+00:00): Hi Rob, that was from the OS 25-inch (NLS). You're welcome to change it back. BW
rojjodo (2021-09-09 20:07:30+00:00): Ok thanks. According to the current owner, the building was re-developed by the owner of the Highland Park distillery, but has been through several incarnations since, including being a care home, but still retains the name of Highland Park House.
Cheers
Bob
conradoos (2022-01-04 19:35:20+00:00): Dlaczego dałeś "access=permissive"? Stosujemy go, gdy "Dostęp dla wszystkich, jednak prawo to może być cofnięte w nieokreślonym czasie. Na przykład droga przez pole, właściciel może ogrodzić pole i zabronić dostępu."
conradoos (2022-01-04 19:37:24+00:00): Tutaj też jest na jednym odcinku "bicycle=permissive". A na drugim dodałeś "bicycle=yes". Jeżeli można jeździć rowerem, to na obu trzeba dodać "bicycle=yes".
mueschel (2021-09-04 09:13:30+00:00): Hi,
tags like destination:left or destination:straight are not common and undocumented. Could you check the established tagging methods and use one of those?

There are three different ones:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging

You can use the destination_sign relation in combination with sign nodes or put the destination on the road leading away from the intersection
mueschel (2021-09-04 10:00:10+00:00): Hi,
please check these edits - there are several objects with many foreign tags that look like they shouldn't appear in OSM.
AwoowoArne (2021-09-04 15:10:13+00:00): Hi mueschel, thanks for informing me. I'm still working in this area and removed some of the non-osm-tags. Which tool did you use to discover the wrong tags?
SekeRob (2021-08-27 10:32:17+00:00): Pity the original set did not warn on this, suspecting a new edit was started without loading fresh data and a copy was saved again of the offending line. Just viewed that set in history... no geometry warnings.