piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
highflyer74 (2018-01-17 14:51:21+00:00): Hello ARATAA!

Could you please make sure that the data you are adding to the OSM database only consists of tagging which is documented in the OSM Wiki.

Things like

ADDRESS=روستاي دولت آباد 7
ARRESTER=دارد
CUTOUT=دارد
HASTERMOST=دارد
MVTRANSFOR=عمومی
OBJECTID=412580
OBJECTNAME=دولت آباد -جنب دبستان دخترانه شهدای اسفندقه
PSTATIONID=43
SERIALNO=6309134
TOTALPOWER=200.0
TRANSFORME=OIL200
UKPERCENT=4.0

do not belong here.

If you need help, let us know!
ARATAA (2018-01-17 15:00:24+00:00): Yes, of course, this data is the output of the GIS software
highflyer74 (2018-01-17 15:12:06+00:00): Hello and thank you for your quick reply. Data imports into OSM require to follow certain rules. Please check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines for further information.

We would like to make sure the data you add is of good quality so everybody can make use of it, and of course it has to be assured that the source of the data is compatible with the OSM licence.

I am not a specialist for those issues, but I would recommend to contact the Import mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports) or the OSM forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/index.php) for further information.

You can also check the wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Power_networks for the proper tagging.

All the best from Germany!
mueschel (2018-01-18 17:47:35+00:00): In my opinion we should revert this import for now. The data itself is welcome, but the guidelines mentioned above have to be followed and the license situation has to be clarified.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:31:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
DemoLogin (2018-11-03 18:38:08+00:00): Здравствуйте, один из участников OpenStreetMap не смог найти на месте магазин "Rozetku-220.ru".
Подскажите пожалуйста, виден ли этот магазин с улицы или он находится внути БЦ?
Menak Vishap (2018-11-13 14:05:14+00:00): Позвонил по телефону с их сайта - как оказалось, магазина здесь больше нет. Он находился внутри БЦ, но они недавно переехали. Так что, удаляю.
DemoLogin (2018-11-13 14:21:56+00:00): Спасибо!
taz2015 (2018-02-14 23:23:49+00:00): Why did this get deleted? You just took out part of a new construction.
taz2015 (2018-02-14 23:26:04+00:00): Now traffic can't route properly. That whole intersection was re-designed.
hoream_telenav (2018-02-15 07:17:45+00:00): hey taz, sorry for the inconvenience; I didn't know about this. I reverted my change set and it's all back. I noticed that is inadequate link right now and I leave it as it is. Please change it if you know it's not right. Thanks and sorry again.
hoream_telenav (2018-02-15 07:20:29+00:00): also if you find anything else ruined by me, please let me know and I'll fix it; thanks
geow (2018-01-20 17:58:40+00:00): Servus alroar, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap! Das sieht nach einem guten Start aus, gleich 3 Neubauten mit Adressen erfasst - super!

Kleiner Tipp: Es ist nicht leicht frei Hand Gebäude rechtwinklig zu zeichnen. Daher hat jeder Editor dafür eine Funktion:  Bei dem von dir verwendeten Browser-Editor iD einfach nach dem Zeichnen das Gebäude markieren und die Taste "s" drücken.

Viel Spaß bei OSM
Klaus
alroar (2018-01-21 09:56:41+00:00): Super, herzlichen Dank Klaus,

Grüße,
Alex
SergeyKaravay (2018-02-09 13:48:52+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Вам не кажется, что Ваши правки имеют мало общего с реальностью? :)
mavl (2018-12-25 00:18:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:49:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:39:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:58:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:24:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:04:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:46:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:00:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:46:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-17 17:29:50+00:00): You asked for a review, so here it is.

The only change you did here was add "(under renovation)" to the name of the hotel. Obviously to mark that it's under renovation!

So is that OK? I dunno. It's a little tricky. The name of the hotel has not changed to add "(under renovation)" to their name. They aren't putting brackets on their signs, and they aren't ordering new stationary and letterheads. So in some ways, it's wrong to change the *name* tag like this.

OTOH, how else are we supposed to mark that someone is closed down (even temporarily)? If the hotel is still operating as a hotel, just with some scaffolding or something, then you can just leave it as an amenity=hotel tag, and leave the name the way it was originally. Maybe put something in the `description` tag.

If the hotel is closed (temporarily), it might be better to use the original name, but delete the `amenity=hotel` tag. That tag is supposed to show that "you can turn up here and pay money and stay the night". If it's closed, you can't do that, so it's wrong to have that tag. It might look like a duck, but it doesn't walk like a duck and only sorta sounds like a duck. I think this is the best approach.

There are some proposals, in OSM, for how to add these "lifecycle" attributes, but I don't think they are widely supported.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-17 17:34:13+00:00): You asked for a review, so here it is. This looks fine. You've impoved the map by changing an undescriptive name to a real name. Thanks. 👍
majid1359 (2018-01-17 15:07:56+00:00): نقاط امروز اضافه شود
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-17 17:40:01+00:00): You asked for a review, so here it is.

Firstly I'm not sure what an adult playground is. And I'm curious. 🙂

Anyway, I don't think "name" is the proper place to put that data, since I presume that's not the actual name, right? It's a description of the thing, not the name of the thing. (Not everything has a name, that's OK!) You could put that text in the `description` tag.

There are some people using `min_age` and `max_age` for features, maybe that might be appropriate?

Are you sure this isn't a "fitness station"? ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dfitness_station ) they look kinda like playgrounds for adults. If you change the tag to that (instead of leisure=playground) it would be more accurate
mavl (2018-12-25 00:47:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:52:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
frosm (2018-01-17 20:23:17+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap
merci pour votre contribution qui est exacte au niveau tag
mavl (2018-12-25 00:45:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:55:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:11:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:53:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
zors1843 (2018-01-19 08:27:09+00:00): Reverted - vandalism
majid1359 (2018-01-17 15:30:26+00:00): تغییرات انجام شود
mavl (2018-12-25 00:18:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-24 23:47:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Truchin (2019-04-02 15:12:55+00:00): Sur cette voie, c'était l'inverse à savoir une rue à sens unique mal type et un contresens cyclable. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/15888561

Bonne continuation

Thomas
Carto'Cité (2019-04-04 07:52:19+00:00): Merci Thomas pour la correction !
Antoine.
viloan (2018-01-17 15:41:25+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
majid1359 (2018-01-17 15:43:57+00:00): تغییرات انجام شود
frosm (2018-01-17 20:39:51+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap.
merci pour votre contribution.
vos modifs ont l'air correcte :)
frosm (2018-01-17 20:41:10+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap.
votre contribution a l'air correcte :)
n'hésitez pas à renseigner un nom ou moyen de contact si vous le souhaitez.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-17 17:46:43+00:00): You asked for a review, but I'm not really sure what could be wrong here. I don't know the area. But if there's a convience shop there, then this is all fine.

In your comment you talk about "health food shop", but you've added a convience. If you meant an actual health food shop, you can use `shop=health_food` https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhealth_food
DaveF (2020-02-25 17:39:32+00:00): Hi
Is there a physical raised platform here or is it a goods yard where containers are unloaded?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553782360#map=18/53.50504/-2.17914&layers=N
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-17 17:57:41+00:00): You asked for a review, so here it is. 

One thing I'll say is that you've created a building within a building, which is wrong. There already is an outline for the building (57 Gardiner St.) ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233487785 ). You've changing it to a single point building, so now there are 2 "buildings" there, one as a point the other with an area.

If this office really is gone, you can just delete the node.
user_5359 (2018-01-17 19:11:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.

And don't use OSM as a private recommendation system.
woodpeck (2018-01-17 17:19:18+00:00): Hello, can you explain why you created this object in Iceland with area=yes (and no other tags): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553783240
smaprs (2018-01-17 19:34:54+00:00): b?c?
vmnss (2018-01-17 21:23:01+00:00): kkkkk, eu só adicionei o site da escola como alteração, desculpe não ter especificado.
smaprs (2018-01-17 21:26:01+00:00): Falou, valeu. Assim se pode saber o que cada um tá editando,  
tipo:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/history#map=7/-29.717/-51.130
eggie (2018-01-17 18:59:16+00:00): Even ter overdenking. De Krimpenerwaard is extreem moeilijk om te mappen. Het komt door de import van de 3dshapes. Even "de jungle" van regels  weer. Je mag geen water op land mappen. Dat sommige mappers dat toch doen zie je niet direct. Water hoort ingebed zijn in een relatie met de landuse dmv een multipolygoon relatie. 
Er is een mapper bezig geweest in de Krimpenerwaard waar we eken bezig zijn geweest alle te herstellen. Hij was niet voor reden vatbaar.
Water op gras gaat nog wel, maar water op bos ga je door elkaar zien zoals je rechtsonder ziet. 
Het land met woning nr 52 zou eigenlijk asl eiland moeten worden gemapt die dan in relatie zou moeten staan tot het water.
Zou me er niet te veel in verdiepen nu. Iets voor later. :)
Wil je er meer van weten zoek dan op het forum naar multipolygoon relatie of multipolygonen.
user_5359 (2018-01-17 19:14:19+00:00): Hello, you have a very creative art of filling the keys. Please read the wiki wiki.osm.org (following the link on the keys)
Constable (2018-01-31 09:23:19+00:00): ciao, sei sicuro della posizione dello skatepark di quarto oggiaro? in quel punto sono quasi certo che ci sia un parcheggio (chiuso e ancora recintato)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5297402129
Constable (2018-02-18 20:23:12+00:00): novità?
realjep (2018-02-19 20:10:32+00:00): Sicurissimo. Lo abbiamo progettato con Milano Skateboarding e il cantiere è in fase di chiusura (skatepark completato).
Constable (2018-02-20 09:03:46+00:00): ottimo, grazie mille, già che ci sei, se è aperto, aggiungi anche il parcheggio e i campi che erano in costruzione qua https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1185086 ? Solo se conosci la zona eh, in caso contrario non ti preoccupare, nessun problema
Grazie, ciao!
mavl (2018-01-17 16:20:52+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 55352945, 55427300, 55427360, 55427428, 55427440, 55427453, 55427470, 55427485, 55427500, 55427505, 55427512, 55427545, 55427556, 55427565, 55427570, 55427595, 55427603, 55427623, 55427636, 55427667, 55427707, 55427716, 55427725, 55427755, 55427767, 55427791, 55427804, 55427815, 55427969, 55427985, 55427998, 55428004, 55428022, 55428037, 55428066, 55428094, 55428107, 55428125, 55428137, 55428156, 55428169, 55428175, 55428183, 55428194, 55428282, 55428322, 55428331, 55428338, 55428352, 55428362, 55428369, 55428379, 55428390, 55428404, 55428411, 55428422, 55428452, 55428468, 55428477, 55428488, 55428570, 55428585, 55428628, 55428635, 55428654, 55428668, 55428679, 55428696, 55428711, 55428724, 55428758, 55428774, 55428789, 55428888, 55428904, 55429531, 55429545, 55429562, 55429570, 55429582, 55429818, 55429832, 55429845, 55429854, 55429861, 55429873, 55430268, 55430278, 55430292, 55430303, 55430310, 55430317, 55430321, 55430328, 55430342, 55430345, 55430350, 55430362, 55430382, 55430388, 55430398, 55430399, 55430408, 55430410, 55430418, 55430422, 55430427, 55430433, 55430438, 55430441, 55430447, 55430451, 55430460, 55430462, 55430469, 55430477, 55430484, 55430487, 55430497, 55430504, 55430506, 55430514, 55430515, 55430524, 55430528, 55430537, 55430538, 55430546, 55430548, 55430557, 55430572, 55430573, 55430586, 55430587, 55430596, 55430598, 55430607, 55430610, 55430613, 55430619, 55430623, 55430626, 55430631, 55430634, 55430643, 55430648, 55430650, 55430662, 55430667, 55430674, 55430682, 55430689, 55430694, 55430700, 55430707, 55430708, 55430716, 55430720, 55430729, 55430730, 55430734, 55430745, 55430748, 55430756, 55430759, 55430763, 55430766, 55430772, 55430778, 55430784, 55430787, 55430790, 55430800, 55430802, 55430807, 55430810, 55430815, 55430820, 55430832, 55430845, 55430846.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-19 13:49:48+00:00): You asked for a review, so here it is. I don't know if what you're adding is accurate (I'll take your word for it 😁), but I can give hints on how it's in OSM.

Mostly this is fine. You have glued the construction site to the RTE outline (at this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5345151809#map=19/53.31714/-6.22889 ). It's a little strange to only attach it at *one* point. It can make sense to "glue" two areas together when they share an edge, but you need more than one node for that.

You've called the site "Cairn Homes site", and I wonder about including the word "site" in there? We know it's a (construction) site from `construction` tag. Should the name be just "Cairn Homes" instead?
chnav (2018-01-20 09:56:29+00:00): Это Айнабулак. Пожалуйста пишите устаревшие названия в old_ref, не вводите заведомо неверные данные, тем более рядом стоит точка place с правильным названием.
mavl (2018-12-25 00:25:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
dgitto (2018-01-19 06:04:10+00:00): Bonjour. The keys you have used are completely invented (it seems from french language). Please read the wiki
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-20 16:17:05+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55526455
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-20 16:17:33+00:00): Looks like you caught a corner of a restaurant to the middle of a street on this one.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-20 16:18:47+00:00): Hello!
            My previous review of your changeset was wrong, so I'm changing its
            status to unreviewed on OSMCHA. Sorry for the error.
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55526455
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-20 16:18:48+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55526455
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-20 16:19:03+00:00): Never mind, I read the change wrong, you __fixed__ the problem I mentioned.
ihbutler (2018-01-22 01:15:36+00:00): Hi Paul,

Apology accepted; no harm, no foul! Funny enough, I discovered the issue while browsing in OSMCha: a node from the building in question had somehow strayed into Lindsay Street and latched on to the way. Given highways are an OSM priority, I thought it prudent to fix the thing asap. 

If you don’t mind a little feedback, would you please do me a favor? The OSMCha boilerplate congratulatory messages aren’t helpful; I’d much prefer to receive comments just on those changesets that you feel require my attention. I do value your suggestions on how to improve my OSM mapping; that’s what’s most helpful.

Ian
frosm (2018-01-21 22:17:35+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur openstreetmap.
merci d'avoir corrigé la présence de vigne et potager.
pour l'adresse, n'hésitez pas à corriger le no de maison et de rue au lieu de simplement tout supprimer à charge pour le suivant d'essayer de deviner l'adresse correcte.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-20 16:19:32+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55526796
Lodivi (2018-01-18 17:57:46+00:00): Позвольте узнать, что Вы имели в виду? Этих "домов" не существует в природе.
zors1843 (2018-01-17 18:01:50+00:00): Are you sure this whole area is a building ? : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/553792792#map=18/50.60798/3.39681
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-20 16:22:52+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55527415