piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rabeyroux (2016-12-14 11:12:03+00:00): Bonjour
Ils étaient créés en double. 
Cordialement
LogicalViolinist (2016-12-14 11:14:31+00:00): Merci
user_5359 (2016-12-13 19:28:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You paint your way over an existing way! If you want change some information, please select the existing way and modified the existing keys. 
And „walkable and public spaces“ isn’t a name, it is a description.
 
Becaiuse of this two errors, I have deleted your entry!
mavl (2016-12-15 12:17:11+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок вы добавили тег narural=tree_row на дорогу. Это ошибка, так как на самой дороге деревья не растут [http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree_row].  
  
Также вы удалили парк. Напишите, пожалуйста, существует ли парк сейчас в этом месте?
user_3957715 (2016-12-15 14:57:10+00:00): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1IJ-1HmRQKv0wJrWJ_HMea_0TzWiCodH8LnilT2W6uZM/edit?usp=sharing в этом ТЕСТОВОМ ДОКУМЕНТЕ  размещеном в интернете на основе технологий "в облаке" идет текстовка . Также я туда вставил линк на спутниковую фото этого места . Там нет парка Там идет пешеходная площадь между дорогой и домом. Pedestrian это же не автомобильная, а  пешеходная  дорога  Со стороньІ дома идут в ряд деревья посаженьІ деревья  .  Также я предоставил в документ "в облаке" ссьілку на  предоставленньій мне отделом архитектурьі фрагмент из Генельного Плана Города.
mavl (2016-12-15 15:33:59+00:00): Это автомобильная дорога класса secondary. Для неё даже установлено ограничение скорости 90 км/ч.  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/257956756/history  
На ней не должно быть деревьев. Если ряд деревьев расположен со стороны дома, то их нужно обозначить отдельной линией. 

Спутниковый снимок по этой ссылке принадлежит DigitalGlobe и охраняется авторским правом  
https://www.terraserver.com/preview/362b77e6275e4d538c06780093f0e7d6?bbox=32.789093255996704,47.06887223693844,32.79295563697815,47.07084525548717&latitude=47.0698605822&longitude=32.7910217643&vivid_plus_enabled=null&image_area=64320.81421433203%20&horizontal_distance=292.8526471932242%20&vertical_distance=219.6354201705172&zoom_level=18

На этом сайте я не нашёл разрешения на использование этих спутниковых снимков в OpenStreetMap. Такое разрешение обязательно. Без него нельзя использовать спутниковые снимки. Пожалуйста, не используйте больше эти спутниковые снимки. Карты из генеральных планов использовать можно (но не как основной источник, так как они обычно содержат много устаревшей информации), потому что это часть официального документа, а официальные документы не охраняются авторским правом на Украине.  
  
Удалять парк можно только если вы сами видели, что его не существует на местности. Генеральные планы обычно содержат много ошибок. Лучше всего редактировать в OpenStreetMap те места, которы вы посещаете сами и хорошо знаете. Вы можете использовать спутниковые снимки Bing и MapBox (они разрешения для использования в OpenStreetMap).  

Пожалуйста, прочитайте статью:  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Uk:ЧаПи  
  
Я отменил ваш пакет правок, так как он содержит ошибку (деревья на дороге) и использует защищенный авторским правок источник (спутниковый снимок от компании DigitalGlobe).
mavl (2017-01-24 16:45:25+00:00): Здравствуйте. Я отменил ваш пакет правок, так как он использует защищенный авторским правом источник данных (спутниковый снимок от компании DigitalGlobe).
mavl (2017-01-24 16:45:45+00:00): Здравствуйте. Я отменил ваш пакет правок, так как он использует защищенный авторским правом источник данных (спутниковый снимок от компании DigitalGlobe).
SimonPoole (2016-12-14 00:00:50+00:00): The additions in this changeset are likely to be reverted. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines for why. This was already pointed out to you on the welcome page after your sign up.
Nakaner-repair (2016-12-14 02:35:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44386643 where the changeset comment is: Revert low-quality import (converted shape file?) whch violates the Import Guidelines (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines).
mueschel (2016-12-15 09:40:12+00:00): Hi,
could you review your changes? There are many tags that are not used anywhere else. Tags that can not be used by any software are rather useless. E.g.:

damage:=major   - there should be no : in the tag

damage:building=residential   - this should be building=residential

damage:street=kilima_hewa    - this should be addr:street, I think.

I can assist in correcting these, please contact me.
Jan
user_5359 (2016-12-13 19:23:00+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!

And please move the address node from the street to the main building.
Zverik (2016-12-14 14:55:44+00:00): Hi, you've broken the coastline in this changeset. I've fixed it, but please be careful and mind the josm validator warnings next time.
jseigneuret (2016-12-14 15:41:27+00:00): Hi, I have check with josm but no warning :/ Thanks you for this fix.
user_5359 (2016-12-13 19:18:57+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your way.
mavl (2017-01-24 16:46:06+00:00): Здравствуйте. Я отменил ваш пакет правок, так как он использует защищенный авторским правом источник данных (спутниковый снимок от компании DigitalGlobe).
Carnildo (2016-12-13 21:48:50+00:00): The lower terminal of the Skyride is a military area?  Sorry to put it so bluntly, but what the hell?
Carnildo (2016-12-13 21:53:11+00:00): Additionally, where are you getting the name "White Park" from?  As far as I can tell, it's just a stray piece of city-owned riverbank.
user_5359 (2016-12-13 19:54:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don’t a description (‚House‘) as name of the building.
sharrin (2016-12-14 03:09:47+00:00): that makes sense! sorry about that.
GerdP (2018-10-31 10:06:34+00:00): Hi! I've cone
I wonder if the Salt Creek Trail https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/72664 should be a continous route or if it is just a collection of cycleways. At the moment there are a few gaps and also a few ways which may not be not part of the rel (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46426451) . Do you know more?
mavl (2017-01-24 16:46:27+00:00): Здравствуйте. Я отменил ваш пакет правок, так как он использует защищенный авторским правом источник данных (спутниковый снимок от компании DigitalGlobe).
user_5359 (2016-12-13 19:56:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a.
literan (2016-12-14 13:02:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. 1. Отдельными линиями highway принято обозначать только проезжие части, отделенные физическими препятствиями; отдельные направления проезда на перекрестках выделять не следует, они описываются с помощью тегов turn:lanes. 2. Тег name - для имен собственных, для названий улиц и шоссе, описания вроде "Разворот над Сущевским туннелем" туда вставлять не следует. Исходя из этого, я вынужден откатить вашу правку.
majkaz (2016-12-14 09:11:15+00:00): I think I speak to myself only, but once more:

Could you please stop using amenity=police for everything and stop introducing duplicates?
If you cannot find the corect tag, please use notes only.
SHARCRASH (2016-12-14 08:17:47+00:00): Hi, This is not a MP but a simple relation to relate several parts of the remnants from a building in ruins, therefore the exact shape is unknown. 
If you were rather reported here because of a building key being set on an unclosed line element well in my opinion this is a flaw of the tag itself.
By logic, the tag building=ruins should be allowed on unclosed lines since ruins are most often partial remnants, but that's up to the OSM community to vote first and then developpers to fix it.

By the way, in your edit you did not close any line and neither the line was self intersecting. According the history you just removed the building=ruins tag, still you left it on the other element of the relation. That's an inconsistent process between those 2 elements.

So in the end i added it back, since i think it's useful to know that the element was a building but all what is left is some walls without knowing what's was the exact shape.
ridixcr (2017-01-16 03:12:29+00:00): hi SHARCRASH!

With regards to the comment about my change, my apologies for having removed this tag and thanks for revertiro but according to the wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Druins "building = ruins" are applied on areas in any case would apply this other tag "ruins = yes" and specify it According to this other wiki http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ruins the type of ruin.

Thanks for your feedback.
mueschel (2016-12-14 10:12:59+00:00): Hi,
could you review these to objects? Tagging seems weird:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459433804
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/459446638

Jan
Константин Гам (2018-11-01 13:45:00+00:00): Убедительная просьба не писать сеошные описания к обьектам
santamariense (2016-12-13 21:46:33+00:00): Olá. Bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap. Você adicionou aqui um "costureiro/alfaiate" chamado "Here". Isto confere? Ou você se enganou e publicou no mapa sem saber?
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2016-12-15 10:09:45+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your interest in Irish Townlands. However it looks like your edit has actually broken a valid relation, because you removed a way from the relation. I have reverted this changeset here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44419224
piligab (2016-12-19 14:54:07+00:00): Hi rory.
I'm not sure how this happened, maybe I could have confused any tags and deleted. I will be careful about my future editions. Thanks for your feedback.
GerdP (2017-09-25 08:00:18+00:00): Hi!
Please check: Why are there two relations named "Niška Transverzala" ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6791194
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6793885
They both seem to be incomplete, maybe they should be merged into one?
PhilSch (2026-07-11 18:09:54+00:00): Bonjour,
je viens de voir votre trace postée sur OSM pour l'accès à la tour percée.
Sauf erreur de ma part, vous avez mis des tags concernant le vtt, ce qui m'étonne beaucoup puisque que cet itinéraire ne peut absolument pas se pratiquer en vtt. Mais du coup il apparait sur certaines cartes dédiées au vtt !
Qu'en pensez-vous ?
cordialement
Philippe
grensv (2026-07-13 08:41:20+00:00): Bonjour Philippe,
effectivement, je vois que j'avais placé une key:mtb:scale. La cotation correspond cependant bien à la description OSM du wiki, voir ci dessous. Mais je reconnais que peut-être encore plus que pour les itinéraires d'alpinisme, ça n'a pas grand sens de côter un sentier qui ne serait praticable que par 10 personnes dans le monde... Et selon les applis utilisées, la légende du tracé peut être ambiguë. Avec un rendu vectoriel comme avec OruxMaps + style element on voit clairement que c'est impraticable, alors que pour les entiers du même type mais sans propriété MTB:scale, on voit juste une trace neutre.  Avant de supprimer cette propriété, je pense qu'il faudrait chercher des discussions autour de ce sujet (mettre cotation ou pas selon rendu souhaité avec applis vectorielles ou pas), pour voir les pratiques recommandées. N'hésitez pas m'envoyer des liens si vous trouvez.
Vincent.
--------------------------------
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
Infos MTB:scale, niveau 6:
Classify ways with 6 that are not rideable at all for a mtbiker. E.g. Chains or stemples (metal rungs) on a via ferrata or simply unsecured alpine pathes that are not even partly rideable for the very best mtbikers (using trial techniques). Steepness is often >45°.
If used for single points, then this highlights exceptionally difficult spots. Often spotting is impossible and falling may be lethal.

Surface: Path is rather a Alpine hiking (T5 or T6) path or bare rock without visible path.
Obstacles: Steps over 2m, rock faces,...
Max. gradient: >100%
Bends: no bends can be distinguished as such.
Riding skills: only the very best trial specialists or vertriders will try to ride these spots. Walking the place first to find a way to clear is needed.
*Martin* (2016-12-22 12:45:59+00:00): Dalsi edit co posahal multipolygon lesa okolo BB (neuzavrety inner ring). JOSM ukazuje pred uploadom warningy a nemali by byt ignorovane. Opravim.
laznik (2016-12-22 14:37:38+00:00): Varovania tohoto typu neignorujem. Asi som si nevsimol. Dakujem za opravu.
demon_box (2016-12-14 20:43:57+00:00): ciao, scusa ma cosa significa nel tag description: "sent . uo down fino dietro al M.Covolo."? cosa significa "uo"??
inoltre sul tag surface "dirt,earth" non è proprio il massimo, o è dirt o è earth ma non entrambi...
fammi sapere cosa ne pensi, grazie.
demon_box (2016-12-20 12:21:30+00:00): "surface=asphalt, dirt" è errato
o metti asphalt o metti dirt ma non entrambi.
grazie, ciao
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-12-13 22:04:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44302062, 44302105, 44302146, 44302160, 44302207, 44302285, 44302724, 44303041, 44303056, 44303066, 44303083, 44303104, 44303163, 44303168, 44303195, 44303215, 44303227, 44303244, 44303273, 44303420, 44303450, 44303501, 44303536, 44303558, 44303583, 44303586, 44303600, 44303607, 44303683, 44303703, 44303832.
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-12-13 22:05:51+00:00): If there are objects with geometry errors, please do not change the object countries while fixing the error.
HNTBahardy (2016-12-13 22:17:23+00:00): Correction.  This was completed in 2016.
HNTBahardy (2016-12-13 22:16:53+00:00): Correction.  This was completed in 2016.
Hjart (2016-12-13 22:37:53+00:00): Jeg har ændret som vi normalt mærker lejrpladser
Tatfahren (2022-04-20 15:56:46+00:00): Hier hast du auf vielen Wegen Zäune eingezeichnet, ist das richtig so, oder hattest du dich beim Tagging vertan? Ich lasse es jetzt erstmal so, kann es später aber gerne korrigieren.
MichaOSM (2022-04-21 05:47:11+00:00): Hallo Tatfahren,
danke :-) Das war falsch!
Ich habs korrigiert, das sind alles Auffahrten, habe ich aus versehen mit falschem Attribut versehen.
dudka (2016-12-15 21:02:29+00:00): межі не тільки виправлено, а й пошкоджено

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2604848
zalex_ua (2016-12-15 22:27:40+00:00): гм, дякую за підказку, щойно виправив
RicoElectrico (2016-12-14 23:31:19+00:00): Prośbę mam: jeśli rysujesz budynki z kątami prostymi, użyj narzędzia w edytorze które pozwala wyrównać kąty do 90 stopni. W iD to zdaje się klawisz S.

Druga rzecz: ręczne przenoszenie adresów z punktów na budynki, jak praktyka pokazuje, nie ma sensu - bo ludzie popełniają błędy. iD nie ma funkcji kopiowania tagów i albo trzeba zrobić to w JOSM-ie (który ma nawet wtyczkę do automatycznego scalania), albo w ogóle olać sprawę, bo adres może być punktem i nic się nie stanie.

Tutaj masz błąd, który Tobie się zdarzył:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=44386389#map=19

Z Beniowskiego 5 i 7 nagle zrobiło się tylko 5, a z 1 i 3 zrobiłeś 1.
Offenbacher_ (2016-12-18 19:40:20+00:00): Please Undo, there is no reason to delete all of this
Athalis (2016-12-13 23:48:01+00:00): Parkplatz mit Hilfe von Bing genauer ausgerichtet
Ranger444 (2016-12-13 23:53:11+00:00): Changeset comment misused*
Official Comment: Cleanup and Local knowledge
Offenbacher_ (2016-12-18 02:42:04+00:00): Please Undo
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:49:23+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 44151319, 44105238, 44127540, 44117498, 44095323, 44090371, 44115857, 44142301, 44115747, 44095990, 44076764, 44151536, 44103719, 44076948, 44086754, 44142057, 44077143, 44088709, 44090031, 44117920, 44147496, 44148457, 44116945, 44089731, 44117231, 44160662, 44151194, 44103294, 44162807, 44049218, 44146868, 44120379, 44086463, 44105435, 44118548, 44075180, 44095678, 44139231, 44127700, 44119854, 44076363, 44139511, 44149374, 44120597, 44117738, 44085388, 44049801, 44076535, 44160883, 44118030, 44149188, 44159984, 44147074, 44119479, 44147291, 44118907, 44127096, 44149593, 44139786, 44150655.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-29 18:51:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44765549 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in Albania
Mapeiro (2016-12-14 09:45:04+00:00): Não entendi a sua edição do way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/108284705
Um pequeno trecho de "Rua Albano Schmidt" entre dois longos de "Rua Albé"?
adrianojbr (2016-12-14 22:34:18+00:00): foi um erro. você já chegou a usar o josm? entre as milhares de funções dele, uma de autocompletar etiquetas. provavelmente, antes dessa eu tenha adicionado o nome da albano schmidt em algum segmento. e quando fui alterar esse trecho, não percebi que o autocompletar estava errado. desatenção minha. agrava esse caso que o foco, como está no comentário do changeset, a correção das rotas de ônibus. então não estava muito atento mesmo com nomes de vias. vlw. abraço.
adrianojbr (2016-12-14 22:37:00+00:00): complementando, corrigi nesse http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44410037.
Mapeiro (2016-12-15 07:44:47+00:00): Sim, uso o JOSM para algumas coisas. Obrigado pela correção.
Supaplex (2016-12-14 03:16:41+00:00): 請用診所 amenity=clinic 會比較貼切
ds_twn (2016-12-14 06:20:20+00:00): 抱歉弄錯了，謝謝！
springtrapony (2017-01-27 17:01:43+00:00): Удаляю его, так как находится в 114 доме
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:12:28+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, welcome to OSM. I guess this node shouldn't be created around 1/1, right? Please check all your changesets! Maybe they should be reverted ...
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:12:51+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, welcome to OSM. I guess this node shouldn't be created around 1/1, right? Please check all your changesets! Maybe they should be reverted ...
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:14:28+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, welcome to OSM. I guess this node shouldn't be created around 1/1, right? Please check all your changesets! Maybe they should be reverted ...
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:14:37+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, welcome to OSM. I guess this node shouldn't be created around 1/1, right? Please check all your changesets! Maybe they should be reverted ...
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:14:48+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, welcome to OSM. I guess this node shouldn't be created around 1/1, right? Please check all your changesets! Maybe they should be reverted ...
SomeoneElse (2016-12-14 12:18:19+00:00): Hello,
Please don't add test data to the live OpenStreetMap Server. If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
Best Regards,
Andy
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-31 14:41:05+00:00): reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44396030
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:15:25+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, welcome to OSM. I guess this node shouldn't be created around 1/1, right? Please check all your changesets! Maybe they should be reverted ...
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-31 14:40:16+00:00): reverted https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44396030
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:17:57+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, again, please check your tools. This ATM has been created several times. Please remove duplicate data.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:18:02+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, again, please check your tools. This ATM has been created several times. Please remove duplicate data.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-14 12:22:21+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
As you can see from the orange line around this change on the map at the right when you view the changeset on the OpenStreetMap website, it overlaps with the Atlantic because some data was accidentally added there.
It's been deleted now, but have you any idea how incorrect latitude and longitude values could have got into the data that you added?
Best Regards,
Andy
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:18:22+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, again, please check your tools. This ATM has been created several times. Please remove duplicate data.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:18:27+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, again, please check your tools. This ATM has been created several times. Please remove duplicate data.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:18:32+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, again, please check your tools. This ATM has been created several times. Please remove duplicate data.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:18:41+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, again, please check your tools. This ATM has been created several times. Please remove duplicate data.
SomeoneElse (2016-12-18 20:44:29+00:00): @pitscheplatsch See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44500466 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1120 .
Felipe Alves (2016-12-14 20:16:09+00:00): Oi, Marcio. Tem mais dados da empresa, para serem inseridos? Como endereço, telefone, site, etc.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:18:51+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, again, please check your tools. This ATM has been created several times. Please remove duplicate data.
pitscheplatsch (2016-12-18 20:19:01+00:00): Hi acevedoa1, again, please check your tools. This ATM has been created several times. Please remove duplicate data.
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:11:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:11:21+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mueschel (2016-12-19 10:54:30+00:00): Hi,
looking at this POI I see that it has many uncommon tags. OSM needs tags that are well-defined to be able to have software making use of the information.

NRHP# = 75001992
RTHL# = 4100
TSAL# = 370
What are these numbers?

 organization1:name = National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)
  organization1:website = http://focus.nps.gov/AssetDetail/NRIS/75001992
  organization2:name = Texas Historic Sites
  organization2:website = http://atlas.thc.texas.gov/Details/5227004100
  organization3:name = Texas State Antiquities Landmark
  organization3:website = http://atlas.thc.texas.gov/Details/8200000370

These tags are not defined. If you want to tag several organizations, they have to be on individual nodes. Best practice is to put them all next to each other inside the building.

Cheers, Jan
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:11:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:12:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-10-21 04:37:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53118469 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44365683].
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:12:06+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359