piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-03 11:22:56+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/577453646/history has shop = alterations that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=alterations ? What kind of alterations? Of clothing? Of engines?
marc__marc (2020-12-28 10:47:24+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/577553505
what's this ? a marker for the boundary between France and Germany ?
another user report it's not a viewpoint
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2475498
Regards,
Marc
adiatmad (2023-06-19 05:44:50+00:00): Hello Arun, I was wondering if you have any idea whether this object still exists. I couldn't spot it in the satellite imagery on JOSM, so I'm a bit curious. Let me know if you have any insights. Thanks!
(https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/45441925)
jaimemd (2024-03-25 04:39:16+00:00): I adapted this to bing image. The wetland seems to exist, but much smaller. The remaining area seems to be mostly farmland.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-20 16:49:19+00:00): O co chodzi z note=FIXME w https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45662989/history ? Co trzeba poprawić?

(tak, wiem że to po 11 latach ale nie wiem o co w tym chodzi, pewnie to skasuję ale może uda się wyjaśnić)
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-20 16:55:32+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=801946#p801946
eggie (2021-10-15 05:16:25+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nog geen welkomstmail ontvangen.. bij deze alnog Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse (2020-04-18 12:13:56+00:00): Just for info, someone's messaged me saying "The Federally Administered Tribal Areas haven’t existed since 2018. They are part of the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa now."  I have no idea if that's correct or not and have no idea who'd be best placed to edit the boundaries if that needs to happen - just letting you know since you added it.
Best Regards,
Andy
katpatuka (2020-04-18 12:26:12+00:00): 10 years' ago edit ;)

enwiki says FATA has been merged with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (5. source) - I go and merge them... ;)
SomeoneElse (2020-04-18 12:34:39+00:00): Thanks!
katpatuka (2020-04-18 14:35:48+00:00): Done. I wished there were district boundary sources for Pakistan available... :/
Graf Westerholt (2017-02-08 07:26:31+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/582941006 Bist du sicher, dass man hier alte Fenstergläser abgeben kann oder meintest du recycling:glass_bottles=yes? Siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity=recycling#Materialien
eggie (2019-09-03 06:13:53+00:00): Na vele jaren weer een bijdrage, maar nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik. Bij deze opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Bolt026 (2025-02-10 09:14:38+00:00): Hi Zbigniew_Cz,

I have a question related to this residential road: Robotnicza (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/45888733), where we provide wrong routes due to motorcar=no and taxi=no. Are these tags still applicable for the street? The residents complained that they struggle ordering at that address.
Could you please take a look?

Thank you in advance!
Catalina
SherbetS (2022-08-15 02:19:36+00:00): reverted in changeset 124908478
CurlingMan13 (2024-09-29 04:46:23+00:00): Found some of these bad nodes still in existence.  Going to follow up on revert changeset so all discussion is in the same place.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124908478
Alla SantoshPavanKumar (2025-10-16 02:52:02+00:00): Closed topic
SherbetS (2022-08-15 02:17:41+00:00): reverted in changeset 124908456
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 09:28:11+00:00): hello!

what you meant by review=<different> at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27866317/history ?
SomeoneElse (2023-01-14 15:11:17+00:00): Hello,
(apologies for asking about something from 13 years ago)
I don't know if you can remember, but is the tagging on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/588828362 OK?  It's both "amenity=pub" and "tourism=picnic_site".  Is it perhaps "a pub with a picnic site nearby", or something else?
Best Regards,
Andy
spark (2023-01-14 15:46:42+00:00): I'd love to say "wow, that takes me back" but I don't even remember visiting there! I was a very inexperienced mapper back then... I think I most likely intended to map "pub with a beer garden". Please feel free to update it to match that, or just remove the tourism=picnic_site. Cheers
SomeoneElse (2023-01-14 15:55:53+00:00): Thanks - someone's already added the "beer_garden=yes" tag so I'll just remove the picnic site one.
Warin61 (2016-02-21 05:41:48+00:00): Hi,
I, or someone else, has stuffed up!!! 
This has left at least 2 of these areas mucked up. I am not happy.. to say the least. 

Could you let me know the web site where you got the info and I'll go through it and reenter the data ... my apology of the errors!
James Livingston (2016-02-21 06:05:27+00:00): data.gov.au, it was one of the really early datasets they released. I think it had all the National Parks in it, but I can't find the exact details
borovac (2023-01-24 11:53:23+00:00): Hi Simon,
You have added street names that differnt from government data.
Can you check that and confirm that they are really called that, since there is no additional source other than government data to verify the accuracy of this data. On government data from this place (60.0712585, 18.8220486) start new street called Kvarnmyrvägen
All best Milan (borovac)
czubi (2020-03-19 15:10:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/565561521
geht der bis zur Straße?
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-06-15 09:11:42+00:00): I created
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:fcode
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:ftype
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:reach_code
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:nhd:com_id
about tags added in imports.

Review is welcomed, especially the first two where I described tags
with over 250 000 uses as pointless and unwanted.

I know that this import was done long time ago, so it is not a stealth complaint, but it seems to me that some of tags used in that import can be deleted nowadays.

I also posted to tagging mailing list, talk-us, Slack US, OSM telegram.
Constable (2017-01-31 11:14:36+00:00): is this shop name real? http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/592662334
Given that this is Italy I guess the name should be Italian, am I wrong?
thanks
woodpeck (2024-05-10 12:14:53+00:00): Hallo Bahnpirat, kannst Du Dich an die Datenquelle für die hier eingezeichneten unterirdischen Leitungen erinnern?
eggie (2017-09-16 14:30:33+00:00): Naar zeven jaar weer begonnen met mappen. Ik stuur je een opnieuw welkom bericht per PB.
GerdP (2015-10-24 17:53:48+00:00): please review way 42863416:
what does the tag highway=ghost mean?
chas678 (2015-10-24 20:11:14+00:00): Legally a road (a Road reserve), however no road was built.  Some maps and documents (e.g. Old maps, other online maps), show these as roads on the map (because legally they are), so the wind up in OSM.  However, a survey shows it doesn't exist.  Rather than delete it, and then have someone come along and add it back because it's marked as a road on some other source, I changed the type to ghost.
GerdP (2015-10-24 20:31:47+00:00): okay, thanks for the feedback. I'll change the highway tag to a note, see also 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/how-to-tag-a-highway-that-doesn-t-exist-tp5857111.html
os-emmer (2024-02-04 15:50:50+00:00): Hallo Xoff,
du hast hier vor ewigkeiten einen emergency_service=land eingetragen. Was ist das?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46769685
Xoff (2024-02-04 16:19:48+00:00): Hallo os-emmer,
ehrlich gesagt, weiß ich das nicht mehr. Ich habe gerade auf meinen alten Fotos nachgeschaut. Es handelt sich um eine Holzhütte, an der "DRK Winterrettungsstation" steht. Es gibt auch einen Artikel in der HNA dazu: https://www.hna.de/kassel/rettungsuebung-drk-auf-hohen-gras-ernstfall-fuer-angehende-notfallsanitaeter-7206678.html
Vielleicht hilft dir das weiter.
os-emmer (2024-02-04 16:26:54+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Ich möchte da nicht mit Halbwissen dran rumpfuschen. Ich lasse die Frage im Hinweis mal offen:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4099902
rennhenn (2021-06-03 11:12:08+00:00): Hallo dibu10, wenn ich es richtig gesehen habe, hast Du vor > 11 Jahren die Wanderweg-Relation 368366 "Hasenweg" angelegt. Inzwischen gibt es 3 Relationen zu mehr oder weniger denselben "Hasenweg-"Runden. 
Nach der Neuorganisation der Alfdorfer Wanderwege vor ein paar Jahren habe ich mich jetzt daran gemacht, dies in OSM nachzuarbeiten. Ich würde gerne die Wanderweg-Relationen 368366 "Hasenweg" und 377900 "Alfdorfer Wanderweg Nr.5 Hohler Stein Schillergrotte" löschen und stattdesen die Wanderweg-Relation 5614119 "Hasen-Rundweg" belassen, da dieser von der Zuordnung am besten zu der aktuell ausgezeichneten Wegführung paßt.
Paßt das für Dich oder hast Du Einwände?
GerdP (2022-10-19 05:11:29+00:00): Moin!
Ich finde den Namen Ostenhagen nur hier in OSM. Kannst Du Dich erinnern, wo Du den her hast? https://www.osm.org/node/598578066
blackboxlogic (2021-05-23 21:58:01+00:00): Hi, I see you added many water features with numbers for names. I'm considering removing these "names". Do they have any meaning?
pokey (2021-05-23 22:20:47+00:00): They have no meaning to me. There were duplicate objects, with identical geometry to bodies of water, on top of the bodies of water. The water bodies had no names, and the named objects had no descriptive tags, causing "Area has no descriptive tags" warnings. I just moved the names to the bodies of water and deleted the tagless objects. My best guess is that they are an artifact of the Tiger import, but they could be anything. I was just trying to clear the warnings.
PT-53 (2022-12-14 07:28:47+00:00): Hallo kunkelt,
es ist ja schon eine Weile her, daß Du diese Straße
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46922404/history
neu eingezeichnet und u.a. mit dem Merkmal
- vehicle=no
versehen hast.
Das war wohl ein Versehen. Denn so könnten die Bewohner dieses Hauses
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/237004065/history
gar nicht zu ihrer Garage fahren.

Hast Du noch ausreichend Ortskenntnisse um das zu bereinigen?

Grüße aus Oberschwaben

PS:
Gefunden mit OSMI-Routing
kunkelt (2022-12-14 20:20:50+00:00): Hallo PT-53, 
ich habe leider keine Erinnerung mehr an das Mapping von damals. Ist ja schon ein paar Jahre her. Aktuell wohne ich 150km weg und kann auch nicht mal schnell nachschauen fahren. 
Deine Argumentation ist allerdings schlüssig, irgendwie müssen die Anwohner da hinkommen. Evtl. sollte man das Attribut vehicle einfach rausnehmen, bis es jemand vor Ort prüfen kann.
Viele Grüße, 
kunkelt
PT-53 (2022-12-15 08:08:15+00:00): Hallo kunkelt, 
Danke für die Rückmeldung.

Da auch ich für eine Ortsbesichtigung zu weit weg bin, habe ich die Straße jetzt in 2 Abschnitte aufgeteilt und den Bereich nördl. der Zufahrt von Geb. Gangloffweg  3 als Path eingestuft und südl. davon das 
- vehicle=no
gelöscht:
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1122238693/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/46922404/history

Das dürfte passender sein als vorher.

Grüße aus Oberschwaben
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 08:24:34+00:00): what you mean by alternative=no on https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/35535/history ?
keujfl839237 (2017-09-20 20:09:14+00:00): Is this a public parking? If not, please remove it or add an access key.
datendelphin (2017-09-22 19:11:27+00:00): Please be more friendly SelfishSeahorse.
This change set is 7 years old. And it would be more appropriate to ask if it is known if it is public or not. A missing detail is not an error calling for deletion in my opinion.
keujfl839237 (2017-09-23 17:00:15+00:00): Hi. Sorry for being too direct, I didn't want to appear unfriendly ... :-(

I just meant that if these are private parkings, they shouldn't be mapped (or at least tagged with access=private, but then it wouldn't be an amenity anymore), because otherwise, they give wrong information to anyone looking for a car park in that area. I think it's better to have no information that wrong one.
keujfl839237 (2017-09-23 17:01:32+00:00): *than wrong one.
freebeer (2017-09-23 18:22:56+00:00): Hi,
To me the point should be to map what is on the ground, what exists, regardless of use.
OSM data is not only used to find the nearest carpark, but these lots would be suitable for a visitor to these (presumably) flats who may well be allowed use of them,who would lose out by removing the data, but more importantly, to emergency responders for whom this mapped information could be valuable to locate the nearest and best access to a particular address.  Remove this and the no-doubt-private driveways and then see if an ambulance crew, multiple responders, can deduce what is best to reach unit 18 here.
keujfl839237 (2017-09-23 19:44:21+00:00): Hi
Mapping private car parks without access=private may be useful for ~1% of people (visitors) but makes this tag useless for the other 99%. (And emergency vehicles need to know where the driveways are, not the car parks.)
datendelphin (2017-09-24 09:42:18+00:00): It is also of interest to pedestrians or cyclists. It's a land mark. For example one could remember "It's the building on the left, right after the car park"
hromain (2017-09-24 11:40:33+00:00): Hello, I am the reporter of these car parks. I think that no one should be a judge of the utility of a tag compared to an other. As already said, a car park is a land use, like the others. And I think that emergency vehicles aren't real users of openstreetmap (it would be very dangerous!!). So I think that speaking of deletion is not fair.

For the real issue of the public or private use of the car park, if you think that it would be valuable to add this information, you can check this page : https://www.aigle.ch/N344/parkings.html and report the informations. However, be careful to use the proper attribute : in most of cases, only parking is restricted, and it is allowed to go through the car parks to foot and reach pedestrian ways (see for example https://www.google.ch/maps/@46.3219804,6.9581597,3a,73.2y,220.38h,99.2t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sHGzXCdWfYzupJHVP0pdSJg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 )

Cheers
keujfl839237 (2017-09-24 17:28:52+00:00): Salut and thanks for replying.
I don't think that car parks for visitors properly tagged with access=private are useless; what I wanted to say is that amenities without access key imply that they can be used by the public. Therefore, not tagging private car parks with access=private gives wrong information to anyone looking for a car park in that area.
freebeer (2017-09-24 21:12:33+00:00): You are reading more into things than you should.  An untagged carpark should be treated as, to paraphrase a g00gle error message I see often, `there is a car park here.  That's all we know.'  I have mapped hundreds of such objects with absolutely no way to definitively say whether they are public, private, for customers, or whatever.  That is something which can only be added with local knowledge.
I would assume from looking at these car parks in question that they belong to the nearby buildings, but then, I would not rely on OSM info alone.
Nobody here will oppose or object to additional data added based on existing data to improve it, but wishing to delete incompletely-tagged info will raise alarms.

hromain, OSM data is seeing increased use due to the accuracy and up-to-date-ness of its data in some places; in fact, I was asked to create a solution for the Rotes Kreuz in response to a difficult call they received in an area already micro-mapped.
Use of a site like aigle.ch you mention should be done only if the licence is compatible (I have not checked), of course.
And I suspect anyone looking for a carpark in the area is visiting, as the other local destinations (school) shows closer parking.  And probably on-street parking is also available, I would guess.  Which perhaps is not yet mapped.
keujfl839237 (2017-09-25 08:35:31+00:00): > You are reading more into things than you should.
Are you sure? So, public car parks have to be tagged with access=yes? This is something we're not doing for any other amenities and most else (roads, parks etc.).
> And I suspect anyone looking for a carpark in the area is visiting ...
If you're on H11 and want to search for the next public car park e.g. on Maps.me, you'll get dozens of private car parks, but not the public ones. This is a major disadvantage of OSM compared to Google, Search.ch, Here, Bing etc.
lenny32 (2019-05-13 09:30:22+00:00): Bonjour,
L'Observatoire (566643868) ne fait-il pas double emploi avec le bâtiment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/76328804 ?
cordialement Leni
CloCkWeRX (2016-06-14 03:56:14+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47148068 - is this being built any further? Imagery suggests no
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-05 21:34:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/601453282/history - have you meant audiologist as in doctor audiologist?
HB9DTX (2023-04-06 19:01:27+00:00): Somebody who is selling hearing instruments. Not a doctor
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-07 04:57:30+00:00): Would https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dhearing_aids be suitable?
streckenkundler (2025-09-27 16:44:05+00:00): Hallo Colin,

dieses CS ist zwar schon "etwas" her, es gibt im Forum dazu aber eine Disskussion. Siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/65x-ref-description-davon-59x-ref-description-forstabteilungsnummer-wohl-falsch-cs-vor-15-jahren/136135

Du kannst dich da mit deinem OSM-Account anmelden. 

Ich bin da NICHT der Themeneröffner, das ist ein User Namens Tobias_Conradi, der es nicht für Nötig erachtet, zu mindestens mal Nachzufragen...

Wenn du Lust hast, kannst du dich ja mal melden. 
Grüße,

Sven
hadw (2017-05-06 09:03:47+00:00): Your tagging of Neal's Yard as a mall is being discussed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/890406

It is definitely not a mall, as the walkways are open and the shops are separate buildings.
APneunzehn74 (2022-11-12 16:36:45+00:00): Hallo, bin gerade zufällig darüber gestolpert. Die Landauer Berghütte N048 ist vermutlich nicht mehr in Betrieb bzw wird von jemandem Anders bewirtschaftet. Auf der Website der Naturfreunde finde ich zumindest keinen Hinweis mehr auf die N048. 
Grüße APneunzehn74
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-12-18 23:00:28+00:00): hello!

what you meant by wpt_description=G at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/603750611 ?
Robert Whittaker (2023-12-19 12:47:24+00:00): The changeset is from a while ago, and was made using Potlatch. The wpt_*, ele, and name keys indicate that I'd used a feature of Potlatch to import waypoints from a GPX track I'd recorded, and then manually adjust them.

wpt_description=G is my shorthand for a gate. It looks like I've added the correct tagging for that, but then forgot to remove the other automatic tags from the GPX file. I'll remove them now.
MKnight (2016-07-20 08:43:30+00:00): Moin, Du hast hier den Strassentyp geändert, aber vergessen das maxspeed anzupassen bzw. zu löschen.
_torsten_ (2016-07-23 14:54:07+00:00): Das gucke ich mir in den nächsten Tagen vor Ort an.
_torsten_ (2016-07-26 12:14:46+00:00): Die Sulzer Siedlung ist eine Tempo-30-Zone.
marc__marc (2021-02-20 15:12:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Je cherche de la documentation sur boules=breton afin de compléter le wiki, quel est sa particularité par rapport aux autres variantes ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Tim Morley (2021-02-20 16:34:57+00:00): Bonjour Marc.

Je ne suis guère expert, mais ce terrain correspond à la description sur la page de Wikipedia sur la boule bretonne : "des allées en terre battue de deux à trois mètres de large et de quinze à vingt mètres de long entourées d'une bordure en bois".
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boule_bretonne

Le jeu que j'y ai joué était, selon ma mémoire, celui décrit ici :
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boule_bretonne_des_C%C3%B4tes-d%27Armor
Mais je n'étais que l'invité, pas l'expert, et ça fait une bonne dizaine d'années et je n'en sais plus beaucoup.

J'espère que cela vous aide un peu.
Warin61 (2016-03-22 23:40:36+00:00): 'Cremorne Oval' now looks to be be gone. there are two buildings over lapping it .. some tables and chairs ... way 47474686 .. tags removed .. note tag added.
Aleksandar Matejevic (2018-11-21 13:00:42+00:00): Hi mrpulley, 
I was correcting some road names in Victoria and I would like to double check with You if the name for way 47576012 is still Gum Flat Creek Road because in all up-to-date sources name for this road is Moyhu-Meadow Creek Road. Can You confirm that name is still Gum Flat Creek Road, or if that is an old or local name?
Best regards, 
Aleksandar
mrpulley (2018-11-21 21:37:25+00:00): I have no idea. When I added this road 9 years ago, it was only a stub (containing only 2 nodes, ending at a fixme at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/605302349 ) - since then, the road has been extended by others, then split (the nodes I added are now part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/642675703 ) - the current way 47576012 I have never been on.
Warin61 (2016-07-04 23:31:06+00:00): Hi
Way: 47651696 looks like sport=rugby to me rather than sport=hockey?
PT-53 (2017-02-04 09:19:40+00:00): Hallo PWolf,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz diese beiden Nodes mit name=de:Wasserpegelmessstelle eingetragen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/607766625 und http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/607766645
In keep right werden deshalb diese Fehlermeldungen angezeigt: http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=81140347 und http://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=95&error=81140348  Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an ?
Grüße
PT-53 (2017-02-04 09:22:27+00:00): Wiki-Link: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dmonitoring_station
PWolf (2017-02-04 23:35:12+00:00): Erledigt, danke für den Hinweis
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-05-04 08:29:08+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/610580371/history has shop = gym that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
shop=gym ? What kind of shop, if any is here?
Is it a gym (in either of its meaning, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gym ) - or is it actuall a shop? If it is a shop - what they are selling there? Gym equipment?
Mateusz Konieczny (2026-03-22 11:09:41+00:00): Can you take look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5214975 ?

Is it existing or not?
Michi (2026-03-22 21:25:40+00:00): No. It sadly has not yet passed the proposed state.
ForstEK (2019-05-18 21:02:32+00:00): Здравствуйте, Вадим! Искал эту мемориальную табличку, чтобы сфотографировать и добавить на карту ссылку на фото, но не нашёл. Его убрали или переместили? Можете проверить?
Graf Westerholt (2017-01-09 12:05:56+00:00): Bist du sicher, dass Fußgänger diese Straße nicht benutzen dürfen (access=destination)? Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access#H.C3.A4ufige_Fehler
marc__marc (2021-03-30 16:00:20+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/611284829
c'est quoi l'espace montagne ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Eric S (2021-03-30 17:14:28+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est la pancarte qui était au-dessus de l'entrée du bâtiment, à gauche de la fromagerie en venant du sud, le 26 décembre 2009, à 12h38. Sous-titre : Exposition, rétrospective, art local, fromagerie. Je peux fournir une photo.
Cordialement
Eric
marc__marc (2021-03-30 20:32:45+00:00): ce serrait donc le titre d'un lieu d'exposition ? reste à trouver quel tag pourrait décrire cela
Eric S (2021-03-30 20:39:57+00:00): Voir : http://www.maurienne.fr/fr/il4-patrimoine,culturel_i205667-espace-neige-et-montagne.aspx

Il y a un passage traversant le bâtiment avec une partie expo mais aussi des commerces (fromagerie, boulangerie, boucherie, vente d'artisanat(?)).
ymblanter (2020-05-09 20:01:54+00:00): Вроде бы, это то же самое, что и Kolguyev Island (1867905)  / Apparently, this is the same as Kolguyev Island (1867905) ?
pangoSE (2020-06-28 06:47:17+00:00): Hej Egons hade öppet i går så jag låter till lördag. Kan du dubbelkolla tiden?
Har dem hemsida?