piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
WoodWoseWulf (2019-05-13 22:41:10+00:00): Wetlands do not spawn Pokemon, in fact, alongside schools, military areas and a few other tags, wetlands actually have the effect of *blocking* spawns. 

If that the intention here is to improve the map for Pokemon Go, this is not the way to go about it because:

1) it's inaccurate by OSM standards, as has been rehashed over and over.

2) It would remove any existing spawns in Pokemon Go.

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/6pxxvn/my_university_isnt_spawning_pokemons_at_all/

https://www.reddit.com/r/TheSilphRoad/comments/aifuk3/osm_spawn_blocking/
Burisma (2019-09-16 00:31:14+00:00): Has MapRoulette failed to merge the node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/358939358 into the reservoir way here?
viloan (2019-05-13 12:32:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-13 14:46:01+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
edvac (2021-01-06 15:06:17+00:00): Hi,
I've seen hundreds of duplicated buildings added by you in this area. Could you explain how you came to add those duplicated buildings to the area?
You are mentioning that you used only Esri aerial imagery as the source for the data, but yet it looks weird this duplication.
Micheal Yani_Import (2021-01-06 22:59:38+00:00): Hi edvac,

Thanks for your feedback, ideally that might have happened during upload when network wasn't all that fine. 

please note! I have corrected all the errors/duplicated buildings.
I appreciates your feedback :)
edvac (2021-01-07 08:10:10+00:00): Hi, Micheal Yani:
Yes, that's a quite reasonable explanation. I wonder if JOSM could handle these kind of situations. If I get some time, I will try to enquire about it. Thank you for your prompt answer!
Leo Slager (2019-05-14 00:31:07+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 10:20:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70832175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2771.
Leo Slager (2019-05-14 00:29:02+00:00): Hier gaat iets fout.
Construction=yes zal niet op de kaart verschijnen.
De goede tags zijn:
highway=construction
construction=residential
Verander je het zelf ?
Odiebla (2019-05-16 09:09:12+00:00): done, zou nu goed moeten zijn? Excuus, ik zal me even goed verdiepen in tagging.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 10:19:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70832175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2771.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 14:32:26+00:00): I am doing the whole area as wetlands slowly.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 14:35:27+00:00): What is wrong with adding the fishing spots at the park?    And having a coastline instead of a line that does nothing?
ma-rt-in (2019-05-13 15:12:17+00:00): Hallo,
wenn du hw=path + foot=yes verwendest, kannst du auch gleich hw=footway setzen.
vg
hauke-stieler (2019-05-13 15:18:56+00:00): Da hast du recht. Habe hauptsächlich die Wege vervollständigt, ziehe das gleich nochmal nach. Danke für den Hinweis :)
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-13 14:45:59+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 10:20:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70832175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2771.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 10:20:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70832175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2771.
Jonathan Masur (2019-07-04 19:04:12+00:00): S'il vous plait ARRETEZ de changer mon tagging, surtout si c'est pour en faire un moins bien. Le télésiège de Gérinioz a été démonté il y a plus d'une année. Les autres installations sont fermées, mais sont encore en état de fonctionner. Elles ne sont *pas* abandonnées.

Bitte HÖREN SIE ES AUF, immer mein Taggig zu ändern, besonders wenn es ist un es zu schlechten. Der seilbahn in Gérinioz wurde im 2018 abgenommen, und ist nicht mehr da. Die anderen seilbahnen und skilifts sind geschlossen, aber noch im guter zustand. Sie wurde nicht verlassen.

Please STOP to always change my tagging, especially if it is to make it worse. The chair lift in Gérinioz was dismanteld in 2018 and is no longer here. The other installations are closed, but in good shape and could function again. Therefore they are disused, definitely NOT ABANDONNED.

Thank you for your understanding / Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständnis. / Merci pour votre compréhension.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-24 18:01:56+00:00): why shop=department_store was removed? Can you link to place where this automatic edit was discussed?
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-05-24 18:04:12+00:00): Also, can you link to specific page of rocketdata.io that was used as a source?

https://rocketdata.io/ main page has no data that are related to this edit
Szymson (2019-05-16 08:19:34+00:00): Przez takie coś, jadąc Grunwaldzką od strony Gdańska, a skręcając w Przemysłową, niektóre nawigacje, np. Yanosik w ogóle nie wykrywają, że jest w tym miejscu zakręt, bo łuki są zbyt łagodne. Poza tym do tego co chcesz uzyskać służą tagi turn lanes, a jezdnia w tym miejscu jest jedna
Bąbel (2019-05-16 10:34:54+00:00): Yanosik będzie widział gdy wejdzie funkcja asystenta pasa ruchu. A prawda taka że mnie informuje o zjeździe w NSZZ - 'skręć w lewo'. Na dojeździe do podzielonej jezdni na pasy ruchu.
Bąbel (2019-05-16 10:49:49+00:00): Gdybyś był uważny to 'turn lanes' zaznaczony na odcinkach obowiązywania. Już 50 lat za kółkiem i 40 pracy z mapami, ale mówią uczeni że uczymy się do 'końca' swego lub uczących. Zmiany widoczne w historii - bo wykonałem autopoprawkę w stylu UMp.
Hjart (2019-05-13 16:17:29+00:00): Hmm. Jeg troede jeg fik slettet dem alle. Der var en hel flok indiske begyndere, der for nogle dage siden lavede flere sæt dubletter af bygninger + veje i kvarteret syd herfor.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 10:20:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70832175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2771.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 10:19:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70832175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2771.
milet (2019-05-15 11:48:14+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du denn hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82878359 das "waterway=fish_pass" entfernt/ ersetzt?
freebeer (2019-09-03 04:54:35+00:00): hi,
i'm seeing that this edit b0rked a bunch of things, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8810085/history .  actually i'm not sure if the missing segment across the river i fixed came from this edit, but you did edit there and i have seen iD dropping members from relations in mountain view, i think it was.

did you deliberately lose the entire riverbank from this wetland?  or is this an undocumented iD feature?

i'll see if the old members are intact and try to restore this relation, but i should probably run the osm inspector somewhere else so i don't go mad wondering why so many simple relations have gotten broken...

thanks
freebeer (2019-09-03 05:09:57+00:00): well, that was trivial.  i wonder what happened with all the other previous members.

sorry if i came across as too accusatory, i'm now awake some 28 hours and in no state for social interaction..

wait, i see -- there should be a lot of scattered wetlands, like along the slough.  i might have to revert the relation to the previous state before this edit (easier than finding and manually merging the previous members).

may be a while, not sure i am capable of thinking now.
mapman44 (2019-09-03 20:47:02+00:00): @freebeer I'm pretty much finished with OSM so you can fix however you think it should be. If not I'll try to get to it at some point.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-01 10:20:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 70832175 where the changeset comment is: Reverting test edits to OSM.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2771.
viloan (2019-05-13 14:41:04+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
DemoLogin (2019-05-13 14:46:05+00:00): and marked buildings as constructed
dpolovinkin (2023-10-01 20:03:22+00:00): hi, Вила Арсови is standing in corner of the field with no buildings there, is it the right position of it?
literan (2019-05-13 17:18:37+00:00): почему название на английском? на сайте магазины названы по-русски https://www.rozoviykrolik.ru/shop/
literan (2019-05-13 17:12:46+00:00): зачем вы дублей Хлеба насущеного накидали? они под французскими названиями значатся. Почему где-то теги кафе, а где-то - магазина?  Откатываю как некачественный и необсужденный с сообществом импорт.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 14:54:05+00:00): I'll finish more later today.   Got to get some work done.
ArnaudJ59 (2019-06-03 09:01:36+00:00): Bonjour Weiffenbachm,

Je pense qu'il y a une erreur dans votre modification au niveau de La Place François Mitterrand. J'ai l'impression que le tracé du Parc Henry Matisse et de la ligne de métro sont maintenant incohérents.
Pourriez-vous vérifier ?

De plus, lorsque vous enregistrez un changement, votre commentaire ne permet pas de comprendre ce que vous souhaitiez améliorer. Pourriez-vous détailler un peu plus à l'avenir, pour faciliter la relecture ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

Merci d'avance
kreuzschnabel (2019-10-20 15:25:49+00:00): Wieso hast du den Freileitungsmast https://osm.org/node/4969570025 ins Haus Elbbachweg 16 geschoben? Bitte aufpassen.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 15:13:44+00:00): It is wetlands.    The whole damn chesapeake bay is wetland area...
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 15:14:20+00:00): https://www.chesapeakebay.net/issues/wetlands
TravGW (2019-05-13 15:16:22+00:00): From chesapeakebay.net/discover/faq/category/wetlands

What makes and area a wetland?
	An area is considered a wetland based on its plants and soil. Wetlands are dominated by plants called “hydrophytes” that are adapted for life in wet soils. Wetlands also have hydric soils, meaning they are periodically saturated or flooded.

Hydrophyte
	A plant that grows only in or on water or very moist soil.

Hydric Soil
	Soil that is saturated or flooded with water for long enough during the growing season that its upper portion develops anaerobic or low-oxygen conditions
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 15:16:50+00:00): It is considered wetlands.   Wetlands can have grass, although even in the satellite feed it shows how hard it is to keep grass growing because of the tidal and excessive rains.   That water does build up 1 to 6 inches of water on the properties.
TravGW (2019-05-13 15:17:42+00:00): If you can build your house on it, then it is not a wetland. Otherwise it would start to sink.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 15:17:57+00:00): "What types of wetlands are found in the Chesapeake Bay region?
A wetland is defined by its soils and vegetation. Some wetlands may be saturated with water throughout the year, while others are not always visibly wet. All wetlands are dominated by “hydrophytes”—plants that are adapted for life in wet soils—and have hydric soils, meaning they are periodically saturated or flooded.

Two broad categories of wetlands are found in the Chesapeake Bay watershed:

Tidal, or estuarine, wetlands are flooded with salt or brackish water when tides rise. Tidal wetlands are found along the shores of the Bay and the tidal portions of streams, creeks and rivers. As of 2010, there were approximately 282,291 acres of tidal wetlands in the Chesapeake Bay area.
Non-tidal, or palustrine, wetlands contain fresh water and make up 86 percent of the wetlands in the watershed. Palustrine wetlands are located on floodplains bordering streams and rivers, along the shorelines of lakes and ponds or covering broad, flat areas where water may collect (such as many areas on the Delmarva peninsula).
Wetlands can be further distinguished by the varieties of plants that grow there:

Emergent wetlands, often called marshes or wet meadows, are made up of grasses, sedges and other leafy, non-woody plants. 
Shrub wetlands, known as bogs or shrub swamps, are characterized by low- to medium-height woody plants. 
Forested wetlands, including wooded swamps and low-lying hardwood forests near rivers, are dominated by trees. Sixty-eight percent of the wetlands in the Bay watershed are forested."
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 15:19:26+00:00): It is wetlands.   Get over it.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 15:20:40+00:00): It is waterfront property.   And waterfront property is considered wetlands.    Quit complaining.   All of the waterfront in the chesapeake bay should be label correctly.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 15:29:15+00:00): House are not on ground.   They are raised off the ground.   There is no basements!!!!!
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 15:32:01+00:00): Get over it.  You guys are wrong.   It is correct to be labeled as a wetland.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 15:44:30+00:00): Wetlands can have grass as well.   Both classifications can exist on the same properties.   Properties are not limited to one classification...    SMH.    Grow up guys.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 15:45:43+00:00): 300 thousand acres of land in properly drawn as not being wetlands that should be....    It needs to be updated correctly.   That is the point of OSM!  to update the map with the correct information.
iandees (2019-05-13 16:09:15+00:00): If you take a look at the description of what OpenStreetMap considers wetlands (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dwetland) it is clear that a neighborhood with dozens of houses does not exist in a wetland.

I saw that you've pointed out various local laws and landuse descriptions, but OpenStreetMap has its own, seemingly different definition of wetland.
SomeoneElse (2019-05-13 17:20:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2764
viloan (2019-05-13 15:15:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-14 01:47:39+00:00): Pode explicar o motivo desta edição?
Alterou a etiqueta de um ponto para edíficio. A localização da Secretaria Regional do Ambiente e Recursos Naturais é neste edificio que é partilhado com a Secretaria Regional de Equipamentos e Infraestruturas.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2019-05-15 18:58:33+00:00): ok, ausência de explicação. Edição removida.
SomeoneElse (2019-05-13 16:20:59+00:00): Repeating what has been said elsewhere, just because your local government has something zoned as "wetland", it doesn't mean that "wetland" is an appropriate tag for the area in OSM.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 16:24:09+00:00): local government.   This is three states worth of waterfront property on the Chesapeake Bay, one of the world largest bay areas.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 16:25:07+00:00): https://www.chesapeakebay.net/issues/wetlands

What types of wetlands are found in the Chesapeake Bay region?
A wetland is defined by its soils and vegetation. Some wetlands may be saturated with water throughout the year, while others are not always visibly wet. All wetlands are dominated by “hydrophytes”—plants that are adapted for life in wet soils—and have hydric soils, meaning they are periodically saturated or flooded.

Two broad categories of wetlands are found in the Chesapeake Bay watershed:

Tidal, or estuarine, wetlands are flooded with salt or brackish water when tides rise. Tidal wetlands are found along the shores of the Bay and the tidal portions of streams, creeks and rivers. As of 2010, there were approximately 282,291 acres of tidal wetlands in the Chesapeake Bay area.
Non-tidal, or palustrine, wetlands contain fresh water and make up 86 percent of the wetlands in the watershed. Palustrine wetlands are located on floodplains bordering streams and rivers, along the shorelines of lakes and ponds or covering broad, flat areas where water may collect (such as many areas on the Delmarva peninsula).
Wetlands can be further distinguished by the varieties of plants that grow there:

Emergent wetlands, often called marshes or wet meadows, are made up of grasses, sedges and other leafy, non-woody plants. 
Shrub wetlands, known as bogs or shrub swamps, are characterized by low- to medium-height woody plants. 
Forested wetlands, including wooded swamps and low-lying hardwood forests near rivers, are dominated by trees. Sixty-eight percent of the wetlands in the Bay watershed are forested.


It is correct.
pitscheplatsch (2019-05-14 05:52:54+00:00): Hi Kamberain, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting almost 180 buildings, which have been mapped just 19 days ago? Thanks.

More information about this changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70198404

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
Volker Fröhlich (2019-08-14 21:24:43+00:00): Eventuell kannst Du zu dieser Note etwas sagen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/499067#map=15/48.1763/16.0678&layers=N
Linie29 (2019-08-15 07:27:01+00:00): War teilweise schon erledigt. Habe nun auch noch die fehlende Ausfahrt von der Tankstelle Richtung Kreisverkehr ergänzt.
Volker Fröhlich (2019-08-15 08:17:37+00:00): Danke!
gabro00 (2019-05-13 18:12:17+00:00): Hiányzik még pár https://e-mobi.hu/hu/e-toltok-listaja
GBAB (2019-05-13 19:25:45+00:00): Igen, igazságod van, csak sajna mostanában nincs rá sok kapacitásom. E mellett már néhányszor elbicikliztem, most épp eszembe jutott, s fölrajzoltam.
gabro00 (2019-05-13 20:35:28+00:00): Mostanában nekem sincs, csak gondoltam segítek :(
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-08 15:06:11+00:00): Los puntos personales que creó se han eliminado, agregue solo puntos de relevancia pública. Agrega los nombres.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 16:06:28+00:00): It is.
Gabriel0322 (2019-05-13 16:09:30+00:00): All waterfront on the Chesapeake is considered wetlands.    It is correct.
StephaneP (2019-07-17 06:15:52+00:00): idem pour celui-ci, il a été modifié récemment, et je l'ai retracé avec une trace RTK (centimétrique)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113951341
trigpoint (2019-05-16 13:41:55+00:00): Why?
JonKrato (2019-05-16 15:00:08+00:00): I changed that small section of the road to keep the consistency of Swindon Road uniform. Also, I believe that part of the road does not fit the description of a trunk_link. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk_link
trigpoint (2019-05-16 15:51:56+00:00): We do not map to make things uniform. We map what we see on the ground.
The wiki should not be taken literally although in this case "On the other hand, the link ends at the latest where it joins a different road" does apply.
There is also mapillary to give a clear view, the green portion tells the Trunk, or link to trunk.See https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&lat=51.64044820708375&lng=-1.843661125751055&z=17&pKey=E9y_-FPy5lr8jJi60tMtPA
These ways have the  
ref A419, again indicating not secondary.
Please revert this change.
Cheers Phil
JonKrato (2019-05-16 21:10:52+00:00): I switched that part of the road back to the original classification.  I did see those Mapillary Images, but I switched it because I didn't feel that it met the criteria for a trunk_link. Thank you for clarifying that the green on the road sign indicates that it would part of the nearby trunk road.