piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
silversurfer83 (2023-04-05 19:00:38+00:00): Nochmal hier im passenden Änderungssatz:
Die Katze passt nicht hier her. Daher:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134550645
eggie (2022-08-07 22:29:39+00:00): Oke, maar ontbreken die accesstags nu niet op de highway=pedestrian?
Groet
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
dadavid (2024-05-03 13:07:57+00:00): hi cassini, 

ist das hier [1] wirklich ein drive-through [2]? Würde mich fast wundern :D

Grüße

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084463041

[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service=drive-through?uselang=de
MxxCon (2022-08-08 21:46:01+00:00): Hello.
When drawing such features, where appropriate, please consider making them square/right angle so that it looks neater and more accurately represent the actual layout.🙂
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124605342
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
nlme (2022-08-07 18:40:29+00:00): Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_in_Google_Earth#Important_legal_note
Phil Nash (2022-08-07 19:34:41+00:00): The position of an object in the world is a matter of fact and therefore not copyrightable. Even if it was, use here is covered by Google's licensing.
https://about.google/brand-resource-center/products-and-services/geo-guidelines/
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:28:51+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:22:14+00:00): This is test commenet ,ignore please
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:50:04+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:10:07+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 19:02:20+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:29:14+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:41:39+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 19:02:19+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:29:16+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:47:45+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:50:03+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
Carto'Cité (2023-02-27 08:44:12+00:00): Bonjour Mathieu.
Le tag railway:kvb s'applique-t-il aussi aux quais ? Tu l'as ajouté à celui-ci, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/275696097, et peut-être bien d'autres.
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:29:15+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:04:21+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:00:51+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:28:33+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 04:03:00+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
eggie (2022-08-07 22:58:32+00:00): Beste Martijn... Waarom access=no

terwijl je kennelijk wel overdag hier mag komen.
We gebruiken dat conditional tagging
Bv
access:conditional=no @ (sunset-sunrise) ... algemeen.. 

of foot:conditional=no @ ()
en dan vehicle=no om alles met wielen tegen te houden.
Groet
eggie
martijnlaan (2022-08-08 05:10:19+00:00): Het betreffende pad is verboden toegang, er staat een bordje aan de ene kant, aan de andere kant en ook nog in het midden.
eggie (2022-08-08 05:12:04+00:00): Oke... duidelijk..
Bedankt voor reactie
Groet
Eggie
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:28:34+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:28:50+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 04:03:02+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:55:08+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:28:52+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 04:36:51+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:47:43+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:47:44+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:50:05+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:10:09+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 04:36:52+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:47:25+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:47:43+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:50:49+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:55:06+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 04:36:53+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:41:38+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:04:20+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 04:03:01+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 19:02:21+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:10:08+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:28:35+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 18:47:46+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:55:07+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 04:50:37+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 04:50:38+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:03:36+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:03:37+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:03:39+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:05:10+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:05:11+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:05:12+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:11:50+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:11:51+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:11:52+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:20:02+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:20:03+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-08 06:20:04+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
ranamasud222 (2022-08-07 17:41:37+00:00): This is just a comment please ignore it
syntex (2025-07-27 12:06:28+00:00): ok
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:20:46+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 14:06:50+00:00): deletado
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Leo Slager (2022-08-08 10:05:50+00:00): Dag HairyCoo,
Helaas kan de editor iD, waar je mee werkt, niet goed omgaan met het bewerken van routerelaties.
Door de 7 changesets is de routerelatie opgeknipt in 25 delen die niet meer op elkaar aansluiten.
Om dat te herstellen met de editor iD moet je dus eerst alle leden van de relatie verwijderen. Daarna kun je de nieuwe routedelen toevoegen. Elk deel wat je toevoegt komt dan achter in de relatie te staan.
Ik kan op dit moment de route niet repareren omdat ik niet weet in welke volgorde en in welke richting de rondjes worden gereden.
Je zou kunnen overwegen om ieder rondje in een aparte routerelatie onder te brengen. Dat werkt wat makkelijker.
Als je serieus met routerelaties wilt gaan werken, dan adviseer ik je dringend om over te stappen naar de editor JOSM. Dan ben je in staat om de samenstellende delen van de route makkelijk in de juiste volgorde te zetten.
Graag een reactie hoe je hiermee verder wilt gaan.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710
HairyCoo (2022-08-08 14:24:19+00:00): Dear Leo,
* Sorry, I don't speak Dutch well, so I'll write in English instead. *
Unfortunately I am not familiar with JOSM, I have tried to use it but I have not been able to familiar with it yet, so I use iD.
I'm sorry if I did anything wrong, it was not intentional (I was trying to fix several wrong data for years back). After editing, I checked my changes with "OSM Relation Analyzer", it says the relationship looks good (http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=12045660&_noCache=on). Otherwise, I made the connection based on this: https://renesseaanzee.nl/transferium/beachhub-3/.
If one can't do anything with the data I added, I can redo it at a later date, but unfortunately my free time is very limited at the moment. If you urgently need a fix, perhaps someone else can do it, using the page above.
Sorry again, I will try to redraw the above flight as soon as I can.
Best Regards,
HairyCoo
Leo Slager (2022-08-08 14:48:15+00:00): Hi HairyCoo,
If you don't mind I will give it a try to repair the route.
However that will be time consuming.
See for yourself:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=3.79314&lat=51.72819&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes
Please remember: editor iD is not suitable for changing routerelations.
HairyCoo (2022-08-08 15:11:29+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for your help! I'm sorry, I must learn to use JOSM... I don't know that iD isn't suitable for editing relations... Sorry, once more!
Hairy Coo
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
eggie (2022-08-07 22:28:26+00:00): Oke.. moped en mofa=yes op de paaltjes..  maar het zal niet routeren, want op de highway=pedestrian ontbreken die tags. 
'Kijk' je nog even? 
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:20:44+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
eggie (2022-08-07 22:14:09+00:00): Top!
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
ALu68 (2022-08-07 21:36:48+00:00): Hallo  JeeArAux_79,

wenn du den Knoten mit highway =bus_stop entfernst und dur eine Linie ersetzt, solltest du auch alle Eigenschaften vom Knoten auf den Weg übertragen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2571719534/history

Aber viel wichtiger ist, dass der neue bus_stop auch in allen ÖPNV route Relationen übernommen wird, auch an der richtigen Stelle - du siehtst, dass die 11 Relationen (siehe unten) betroffen sind.
ALu68 (2022-08-07 21:39:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124614308
ALu68 (2022-08-07 21:43:58+00:00): So viele "kleine Änderungen "

Lies mal diese Seite "Good changeset comments"
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2022-08-09 16:32:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124693034 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: transliteration - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124639538].
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Emmanuel-201901 (2022-08-08 13:01:30+00:00): Bonjour,

Je vois que vous avez cartographié l’ancien chemin de fer Castres-Murat mais je pense que ça aurait été plus propre et clair de créer une relation entre les éléments encore existants même s’ils ont évidemment totalement changé d’affectation et de rajouter uniquement des ways pour les parties disparues à ce jour.

Là, on a des lignes en doubles un peu partout, je trouve ça peu clair.

De plus, je vois ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:railway%3Dabandoned que l’usage de railway=abandoned correspond à une voie ferrée dont on voit encore des vestiges. Ce n’est plus le cas pour cette voie. Il ne reste que des aménagements aux mêmes endroits que la voie d’origine mais pas de traces des aménagements d’origine, abandonnés dans les années 1960 je crois, à part des tunnels et des ponts.

Je trouve intéressant d’avoir cartographié cette ancienne ligne, je m’étais posé la question de le faire aussi… mais je pense vraiment que la relation aurait été plus appropriée.

Qu’en pensez-vous ?
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
MxxCon (2022-08-08 21:49:30+00:00): Hello.
As documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions "name=" tag should not be used as a description. In this edit "Elevator" is not a name but a description what that feature is, and as such it shouldn't be named like that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124607539
Allison P (2022-08-09 01:49:53+00:00): Also the room numbers are not names. Should be addr:room.
user_12500175 (2022-08-07 18:19:17+00:00): Hallo,
klasse dass du bei OSM mitmachst.
Allerdings ist du bei dem Weg anscheined die ganzen Eigenschaften gelöscht. Der Weg ist auch teil einer Relation was besondere Vorsicht bei der Bearbeitung vorrausetzt.

Gruß
Danfost
Somberland (2022-08-07 18:45:17+00:00): Gruß. Das war eigentlich nicht Sinn der Sache. Wollte nur n paar POI und nen neuen Weg hinzufügen. Sorry! Da hat mir die App wohl ein Schnippchen geschlagen
user_12500175 (2022-08-07 18:47:08+00:00): Bekommst du das wieder hin oder soll ich jemanden Fragen der den Edit zurücksetzt?
Somberland (2022-08-07 19:08:03+00:00): Müsste mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124609851#map=16/48.3231/10.9490 zurückgesetzt worden sein :)
user_12500175 (2022-08-07 19:13:42+00:00): dann passt es ja, habe nur gefragt weil du einen Edit hast .
Frohes mappen gruß Danfost
haukep (2022-08-07 19:57:09+00:00): Hallo! Danke für deine Änderung. Dieser Bahnübergang scheint vor einiger Zeit temporär(?) gesperrt worden zu sein; vor gerade mal zwei Monaten wurde er mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121706185 bei OSM als gesperrt eingetragen.

Daher kurz nachgefragt: Warst du persönlich vor Ort und konntest du dir die Lage selbst anschauen? Ist der Bahnübergang wieder überquerbar?
BaluBalu (2022-08-07 21:54:42+00:00): Ich bin heute einen Teil der EV3 abgefahren und war mir sicher, über den Übergang gefahren zu sein. Aber laut Tracking bin ich wohl über einen anderen Übergang geführt worden. Ich werde das Changeset zurückziehen.
BaluBalu (2022-08-07 21:57:25+00:00): Danke für die Prüfung und den Hinweis :)
Andreas Binder (2022-08-07 20:11:58+00:00): Überwiegender Teil des Gebäudes ist eine Tagesstätte.
SHARCRASH (2022-08-08 12:33:50+00:00): Urgh yes sorry and thanks! There is so much to correct... Here i've split the areas to make the orchard, so i wanted actually to change the value of landuse and accidently added oneway=shed. I realize now i haven't finished some leftovers because i had seen other things to be corrected.
Jakka (2022-08-08 06:02:23+00:00): Deze info lijkt niet correct ?
wordt verwijderd
eggie (2022-08-07 21:48:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback  Tip...  In OSM Nederland zetten we geen adresgegevens op de gebouwomtrekken. Er zijn immers al adresnodes.
Het adres heb ik even verwijderd. De adresnodes uit elkaar gehaald.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
mavl (2022-08-09 16:32:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124693034 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: transliteration - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124639538].
Fizzie-DWG (2023-04-22 03:34:53+00:00): Reverted by DWG for adding fictitious or duplicated information: changeset/135214744
Dino Michelini (2022-08-29 16:27:24+00:00): Ti segnalo che mappando l'uso suolo non si possono unire i punti con quelli delle strade perché le strade avendo una scala metrica i limiti delle aree interessate all'uso del suolo non coincidono con quelli della geometria highway. Mappando in questo modo che non tiene conto della realtà, inoltre, crei non pochi problemi nella manutenzione (aggiornamento) degli assi stradali e delle route che li utilizzano generando solo un mare di confusione tra le geometrie highway e landuse. Andrebbero scollegati tutti i nodi delle geometrie landuse da quelli delle highway e ridisegnati i nuovi confini utilizzando al posto di poligoni i multipoligoni, molto più efficienti e corretti dal punto di vista topologico.
Luzandro (2023-01-05 11:22:19+00:00): Hallo,

bitte nicht sinnlos zw. cycleway und path hin und her taggen, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96840071

im Übrigen passt auch das CS-Kommentar nicht dazu
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124608429
waldhans (2023-01-05 12:47:38+00:00): Sinnlos ist gut gesagt. 

Dein Tagging bicycle=designated/foot=designated/highway=cycleway/
ist ueberfluessig, genau das sagt highway=cycleway.

Und das sind keine vorgeschrieben Radwege (eckiges Taferl), daher stimmt 
highway=path/foot=designated

OK?
Luzandro (2023-01-05 13:07:36+00:00): ob eckige Taferl oder nicht ist völlig egal, das hat nur Bedeutung für eine mögliche bicycle=use_sidepath Beschränkung auf der parallelen Straße. Im Übrigen trifft das auf die meisten nicht einmal zu, wie auch in dem Mapillary-Bsp. im verlinkten CS zu sehen. Das redundante bicycle=designated + highway=cycleway ist genau deshalb da, weil solche geteilten Geh- und Radwege regelmäßig je nach Editor, Vorlieben oder Unwissen hin und her getaggt werden ohne semantisch etwas zu ändern
waldhans (2023-01-05 13:22:22+00:00): Falls du "ob eckige Taferl oder nicht ist völlig egal"  wirklich ernst meinst, solltest du nochmal nachlesen. Das sind die Bestimmungen für den getaggten Weg, und die Benutzungspflicht ist genau der Unterschied.

Und "redundante bicycle=designated + highway=cycleway" ist genau wie du schreibst: redundant und damit überflüssig. Genau das führt zum tagging chaos, Nochmals, liest dir die Access-Reglen für path/footway/cycleway durch und tagge nur die Abweichungen davon.
Константин Гам (2023-03-23 11:42:31+00:00): Зачем здесь oneway?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084471381
Не было и не появилось
Bobropiton (2023-03-24 09:24:31+00:00): Благодарю за исправление. Моя ошибка
Bobropiton (2023-03-24 09:27:16+00:00): Oneway был выставлен на основании поворота только направо с Храмова переулка на Добролюбова. Однако не была учтена возможность разворота по Добролюова
jodd (2023-11-18 16:59:46+00:00): Hallo,
auch hier hast du wiederholt nichts existierende Gebäude blind aus ALKIS abgemalt. Habe dieses nicht vorhandene Gebäude gelöscht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084476382
VG Jo
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
eggie (2022-08-07 22:25:29+00:00): Dag Hotten.. Het blijft merkwaardig.
Ik heb bicycle:forward=no getagd op dat kleine stukje..  Dan geldt het verbod  niet voor zuid naar noord.
Groet
eggie
Hotten (2022-08-10 20:16:14+00:00): Hallo eggie,
Vanavond hier even langs gefiets.
bij de overig paden in dit gebied staat ook bij elke ingang een fietsverbod.
Weliswaar niet overal goed zichtbaar maar als je er naar zoekt dan is het te vinden.
Nu lijkt het weer logisch. Ik zal begin volgende week eea aanpassen.
Bedankt voor de tip.
I
eggie (2022-08-10 20:18:59+00:00): Top... Dan kun je dat forward ook gewoon wijzigen in bicycle=no
Mapse..
Eggie
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
user_6110846 (2022-08-11 05:59:49+00:00): твою русскую херню откатили  несогласен пиши в DWG
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
user_2066394 (2022-08-07 22:44:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/81190170
Das ist hier schon eingetragen.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Luzandro (2022-08-09 17:14:05+00:00): Hallo,

was soll dieser node mit name=4IN4 bedeuten?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9937842108

es fehlt bei dem Weg auch der Kreuzungspunkt, genauso wie auch bei diesem: 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1084491423
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124610023