piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-03-20 19:44:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-03-20 19:44:19+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Polarbear-repair (2019-05-12 20:56:47+00:00): For w 119159553, your script updated the website to https, but ignored the fact that the hotel has a different operator since 2018, and the Kempinski website redirects to a generic one. Thus, your script did not improve the OSM data quality, it masked that the URL was outdated. As usual with mechanical edits.
Hjart (2019-03-20 20:10:06+00:00): That should have been covered by motor_vehicle=yes, right?
PEMIGRA (2019-03-20 20:17:00+00:00): Right.
htorpey (2019-03-20 20:34:32+00:00): Please delete my changeset comments. I failed to notice that they had carried over from the HOTOSM mapping I had been doing previously. Should read "Corrected what was labeled Nieto Ave and tagged residential road to a nameless dirt footpath, which is what is in fact there."
EdLoach (2024-01-03 17:19:08+00:00): Hi. Do you remember where you got the Station Lane and Old Station House names from? I've seen suggestions that the address of the house might (now) be Gate House, Rectory Road. Thanks.
eggie (2019-03-20 22:16:11+00:00): Dag Momfer.. begin nooit met access=no behalve als er een bord "verboden toegang" staat.
het is een totaal verbod. 
Je hebt footway omgetagd naar path. Dat zal wellicht correct zijn. Als tweewielers hier niet mogen komen tag je 
vehicle=no
Kijk je er nog even naar?
access=no zal niet correct zijn.
MVG,
Eggie
Momfer (2019-03-21 11:02:25+00:00): Hallo Eggie, Ik t vhet aangepast. Bedant maar weer!
eggie (2019-03-21 12:42:33+00:00): Top!
Momfer (2019-03-21 13:13:51+00:00): <blush>
htorpey (2019-03-20 20:32:39+00:00): Please delete my changeset comments except for "Englarged the lagoon to reflect dredging and restoration completed in 2017." I failed to notice that they had carried over from the HOTOSM mapping I had been doing previously.
Andrea Musuruane (2019-03-21 14:32:44+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. L'edificio ove è presente la sede degli alpini non sembra disegnato correttamente. Dalle foto satellitari risulta decisamente più grande del reale. Inoltre gli angoli non sono rettangoli. 

Questa way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/256744272 non può essere un leisure=pitch (ovvero un campo da gioco). 

Ciao,

Andrea
Andrea Musuruane (2019-03-21 14:33:48+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. 

In Italia, i numeri civici (tag addr:*) non vanno messi sugli edifici. Le direttive dell'ISTAT, che tutti i comuni italiani devono seguire, dicono che "il numero civico [è] costituito dal numero che contraddistingue l’accesso esterno che dall’area di circolazione immette direttamente o indirettamente alle unità immobiliari (abitazioni, esercizi, uffici, ecc.)":
https://rnc.istat.it/DOCUMENTI/Manuale_per_le_operazioni_sul_campo.pdf

I numeri civici devono quindi essere inseriti come nodi in corrispondenza dell'accesso (porta, cancello, ecc).
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses

Inoltre, il nome dell'edificio dovrebbe essere inserito senza virgolette.

Ciao,

Andrea
Gh0stz0x (2019-03-21 15:23:42+00:00): Ha ragione, ed è per questo che anch'io devo correggere tutti i civici che ho inserito. 😭
Matteo_H (2019-03-21 15:38:38+00:00): ok
eggie (2019-03-20 22:21:18+00:00): Dag E@A,

Je hebt hier per abuis een woning van vorm veranderd.
Dit waren je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68351859
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-20 22:25:17+00:00): Woning hersteld
htorpey (2019-03-20 20:31:34+00:00): Did not notice that my changeset comments had carried over from HOTOSM mapping I had been doing previously! Please delete all but "Englarged the lagoon to reflect dredging and restoration completed in 2017."
movie_fan_sal (2019-03-26 03:24:38+00:00): Hi jrachi, did you mean to delete way 12808447? This left a gap in the secondary road. The road is visible in imagery.
Jrachi (2019-03-26 16:45:56+00:00): I apologize.
It was an unpardonable mistake.
movie_fan_sal (2019-03-27 00:36:04+00:00): No worries. Thank you for responding and adding the road again.
htorpey (2019-03-20 20:29:28+00:00): Please delete my changeset comments except for "Englarged the lagoon to reflect dredging and restoration completed in 2017." I failed to notice that they had carried over from the HOTOSM mapping I had been doing previously.
htorpey (2019-03-20 20:30:21+00:00): Actually delete the whole thing on this one. Should read "Edited bike path to reflect changes made during installation of new youth sport court."
Extant (2019-05-04 00:06:01+00:00): This edit was incorrect; the two pieces of Beverly Drive are not connected, and it is impossible to traverse the marshy chasm between them by car. This stretch of road is not open to vehicle traffic.
LeTopographeFou (2020-05-04 11:38:06+00:00): Bonjour Vincent,
Dans ce changeset (de 2019) tu as créé un labo que tu avais déjà ajouté en 2011. Malheureusement surement parce qu'il n'y a pas de consensus sur la carto des labos et 
que tous les rendus ne gèrent pas toutes les variantes... Je suggère de supprimer ce doublon plus récent. Ok pour toi ?
vincent_95 (2020-05-04 11:42:46+00:00): Ah oui bien vu. Merci pour ta vigilance, ok bien sûr
LeTopographeFou (2020-05-05 12:24:08+00:00): Fait dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/84694981, merci.
viloan (2019-03-20 20:25:45+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Carto'Cité (2020-02-14 10:06:05+00:00): Bonjour Furdrien,
Tu as ajouté le way pour décrire l'aménagement cyclable ... mais tu n'as pas retiré le track sur ce way (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577529697) Je le retire mais si tu penses qu'il s'agit de 2 aménagements différents n'hésite pas à me dire.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVéloIdF
viloan (2019-03-20 20:45:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Kogacarlo (2019-03-27 16:21:26+00:00): Doe het dan wel goed; het is Zaarderheiken met een r ;-)
A67-A67 (2019-03-27 18:11:57+00:00): Bedankt voor de oplettendheid en de correctie!
Oskarst_ (2024-01-23 15:10:47+00:00): Hei, finnes way 678271488? Ser ingen spor av den i flyfoto eller i Strava Heatmap
XVEC (2019-03-22 21:29:53+00:00): Fins a l'obertura del vial, es mantindrà la característica com a vial en construcció
viloan (2019-03-20 21:35:13+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mrlanduse (2019-03-20 22:29:28+00:00): Dear Metro Vancouver,

what's the purpose of your edit?
MV_GIS (2019-03-20 22:44:52+00:00): This shows the drinking watershed boundary as delineated by lease agreements.
viloan (2019-03-20 22:11:57+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
StephaneP (2019-03-29 17:06:09+00:00): Bonjour e pt,
Je me demandais pourquoi certaines parties de la rue de la faiencerie sont devenu interdites au vélos ? Tu as vu des panneaux sur place ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678279409

A bientôt
Stéphane de Carto'Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
mavl (2019-05-09 21:11:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 70070559, 70089054, 70085951, 70037729, 70077636, 70057605, 70050915, 70060594, 70055377, 70044356, 70083698, 70087499, 70065088 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping].
Hjart (2019-03-21 07:30:12+00:00): Wouldn't it be simpler (and better) to make the southernmost bit of Slettevang oneway?
Burricane (2019-03-21 17:15:13+00:00): Hi Hjart,

I added the turn restrictions to allow bicycles to travel through the bollards. Do you think this is the best way to model?

Thanks
Hjart (2019-03-21 18:48:01+00:00): Those turn restrictions sadly do not allow bicycles to enter Slettevang. Replacing them with a little bit of oneway combined with a oneway:bicycle=no as seen in i.e. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1794683 would do the trick, as well as be way more resilient to mishaps (I've seen way too many turn restrictions getting messed up, so I prefer to avoid them when possible)
Burricane (2019-03-21 20:38:29+00:00): “Hjart,

Okay that makes sense. I’ve made your suggested edits, and removed the restrictions I created.”
eggie (2019-03-20 23:16:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2019-03-20 23:18:41+00:00): review... Begin nooit en nooit met access=no
Geef gewoon aan wie er niet mogen komen.

access=no is een totaalverbod. Het bord verboden toegang.
Wellicht hier gewoon vehicle=no of wat de borden aangeven.
Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-20 23:21:58+00:00): "niet nader bepaald" is geen osm tag. Die regels weghalen.
Je kunt gewoon aangeven
vehicle=no
dat geldt voor alle voertuigen.. 

of apart taggen
motor_vehicle=no
bicycle=no
moped=no
mofa=no

Eggie
Leo Slager (2019-03-21 15:12:16+00:00): "niet nader bepaald" komt rechtstreeks ui de editor iD. het is niet de bedoeling om dat over te nemen. 

Overigens zijn hier in het verleden wel wat foutjes gemaakt:
highway=footway
bicycle=yes
lijken mij wel voldoende, op grond van de foto's, om het voetpad correct te taggen. Alle andere tags heb ik verwijderd.
eggie (2019-03-20 23:24:57+00:00): Het terrein staat nu nog als amenity=school

Je kunt het evt. veranderen in landuse=construction of als het nog een tijd braak ligt als landuse=brownfield
Niet een name= gebruiken voor wat er komt.
Je kunt dat kwijt onder note=  (voor andere mappers)  of bv description=
MVG,
Eggie
maraf24 (2019-03-25 15:35:05+00:00): Mergujesz adresy z budynkami korzystając z wtyczki w JOSM?
maraf24 (2019-03-25 15:36:07+00:00): Wtyczka jest niebezpieczna, wynik jej pracy wymaga sprawdzenia:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/678289593
RafalR (2019-06-27 15:56:26+00:00): Zauważyłem już to kiedyś i teraz używam wyszukiwarki tak żeby pomijała obiekty z place
Dr Kludge (2019-03-23 01:46:38+00:00): Hey there thanks for your interest int eh South Mountain Freeway.  I did not understand why you deleted a segment of the I-10 west bound freeway just to add it back.  Besides nodes and ways there are also relations that are part of the map.  You removed information from six relationships that needs to be repaired now.  I will be happy to fix the issue but please think about relations in your future edits.
Unggo99 (2019-03-22 04:36:10+00:00): What was the point of deleting multiple roadways?
pallih (2019-03-22 09:43:28+00:00): This is a incorrect change. Lindargata is a one way street to the west between Vitastígur and Frakkastígur. That can be cleary confirmed here: https://ja.is/kort/?type=map&x=357720&y=408078&z=10&ja360=1&jh=95.6
Araucaria_araucana (2019-03-22 16:39:38+00:00): Hi Pallih,

Thank you for catching this edit. I missed the “do not enter” sign. I have reinstated the oneway.

Regards
aixbrick (2019-03-21 17:17:00+00:00): Hallo,
offenbar ist das ein Tattoostudio. Nur passt hier so einiges nicht:
1. Laut Website sind die in der Wallstraße 62. Das hier ist aber 58 (kann aber auch falsch sein).
2. Es fehlt mindestens das Tag shop=tattoo
3. Sofern die nicht das gesamte Haus nutzen, sollte das besser als Punkt (Node) gemappt sein.
4. Weitere Daten (z.B. Website, Öffnungszeiten) wären auch nicht schlecht.
Bitte nochmal drüberschauen.
Gruß
aixbrick (2019-04-28 09:30:34+00:00): Mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69658711 Daten ergänzt.
aceman444 (2019-03-24 22:22:09+00:00): Hi, there is no need to split roundabouts (e.g. way 678299916) into segments, if all have the same tags. You needlessly break bus route relations.
Adamant1 (2019-04-20 11:36:54+00:00): Again, someones back yard. Not a park, clearly not a county park.
stevea (2019-04-21 01:12:52+00:00): I have no idea which park you refer to in this changeset.  Please specify by ID # of the node, way or relation.
Adamant1 (2019-04-26 02:51:12+00:00): You could easily just click the edit button and look you know. Since you don't want to, it's the three little "parks" along the coast between the end of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary and the beach. In the lower corner of the square this changeset is in. You really should know anyone. Since your the one that edited them.
stevea (2019-04-26 02:53:27+00:00): I have edited tens of millions, perhaps hundreds of millions of things.  As I've said you repeatedly, use way #s or node #s or relation #s like a big boy.
stevea (2019-04-26 02:55:03+00:00): In short, if you can't write a bug report, what you call a bug (defect) can't be fixed, or only gets a vague bit closer because YOU were vague in the first place.
Adamant1 (2019-04-26 09:42:06+00:00): "gets a vague bit closer because YOU were vague in the first place."

Well, in my defense I figured it would be enough to just add the comment to the changeset, because I didn't notice you had done hundreds of edits in one change. So I assumed it would be obvious. Also, because they are all at the top of the changeset. It probably would have been better to do this in a note, but before when I used notes you just went off and closed them without them being dealt with. So I figured in a changeset you couldn't dodge out of it so easily. I can just open notes for them where they are though if that would be better. I suggested it in another in another changeset comment. That would also keep us from polluting the changeset comments with our back and forth. Although, it would then pollute the notes, but I still feel it would be a better medium for this. It would at least deal with the whole "where are you talking about thing" if nothing else.
Leo Slager (2019-04-03 22:24:55+00:00): Door schuiven met de kaart in de edit modus is de kaart ernstig beschadigd.
De brug en het water bij De Cruserstraat zijn ernstig beschadigd.
ik kijk even of ik het kan repareren.
Leo Slager (2019-04-03 22:26:46+00:00): Hier kan je zien wat je wijziging was:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=68358997&zoom=20&lat=52.32349&lon=4.86248&layers=B0TTTFT

Je changeset is dus veel te groot.
Door het schuiven met de kaart is het geheel uit zijn verband gerukt.
Leo Slager (2019-04-03 22:40:46+00:00): De warboel is nu zo groot dat ik niet meer kan bepalen wat in welke volgorde verschoven moet worden.
Er zit dus niets anders op dan de hele changeset te reverten. Daarmee gaan jammer genoeg ook de goede wijzigingen verloren.
Leo Slager (2019-04-03 22:46:01+00:00): reverted with my changeset 68860172
padvinder (2019-04-04 01:04:34+00:00): Sorry. Het blijft mensenwerk. Die schuif zal per ongeluk gebeurd zijn. Mooi dat je het in de gaten kreeg!
Warin61 (2019-04-25 07:37:28+00:00): Hi
This is not yet on LPI Imagery, nor on ERSI or bing or digital globe. 
Back to proposed.
Minh Nguyen (2019-03-21 07:09:33+00:00): This changeset moved node 6338689283 from the corner of High and Jefferson to a location along the edge of the neighborhood as it replaced the node with a place=neighbourhood area. This change is problematic for two reasons: the geographic centroid of this area is not the commonly acknowledged center of the neighborhood (as stated by Wikipedia), and place areas per se aren’t rendered by most renderers. If we were to map the neighborhood as an area, we would need to map the boundary as a boundary=administrative admin_level=10 relation, with the place=neighbourhood node being a member of that relation with the label role.

Apart from that, city-data.com says the neighborhood boundary data is copyrighted by urbanmapping.com. So I don’t think we should rely on it as a source, unless you or someone else has secured permission from urbanmapping.com under terms compatible with the ODbL.

I would favor reverting this changeset, though I thank you for deleting the other POI someone later added in the middle of the fruit-themed streets – that seemed to be a misunderstanding too.
AlaskaDave (2019-03-21 09:19:08+00:00): Hi,
I took the positional source from a link in the Wikipedia article cited and did not check for copyright status, thinking if it was in Wikipedia it was okay to use. I agree that it cannot be used as such given the copyright issue you raise. However, rather than revert the changeset. let me redraw the boundaries approximately following the guidelines in the written Wikipedia article.

However, the problem of the centroid and where it happens to render is not something I think should influence whether or not we describe the Fruit Belt using a node or an area. Also, I don't believe this is an "administrative area" in the usual sense so using administrative boundaries wouldn't be appropriate or correct. 

AFAIK, this area is merely a locality. Unless you know otherwise, I think it's best to leave it as place=neighborhood.

I will go back and change the boundary to align better with Michigan Ave., etc., and remove the reference to city-data.com.

What do you think?
AlaskaDave (2019-03-21 09:21:05+00:00): By the way, the reason I have an interest in this area is because it's my hometown. I lived on High St near Herman and attended PS 39 for the first 10 years of my life.
Minh Nguyen (2019-03-21 09:30:47+00:00): Awesome, I’m glad there are local eyes on this part of the map, especially given the online attention that https://onezero.medium.com/how-googles-bad-data-wiped-a-neighborhood-off-the-map-80c4c13f1c2b brought this neighborhood.

My edits were only ever intended to be a starting point for further refinement. If you can determine the neighborhood’s boundaries independently using local knowledge, there’s no need to cite city-data.com as a source. Aligning or joining to the streets that form the boundaries would be worthwhile, to avoid incorrect geocoding on the other side of the affected streets.

Even if Buffalo neighborhoods aren’t formal enough to have administrative boundaries, we could still add a non-administrative boundary relation. Do you agree with Wikipedia’s claim that the neighborhood is “centered on” the High/Jefferson intersection? If so, maybe we should put a place POI there and add it to the non-administrative boundary relation with the label role.