piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dadavid (2024-06-06 12:54:29+00:00): Hi SvenQ, 

du hast hier [1] die S271 auf einem Teilstück umbenannt von "Oberwiesenthaler Straße" zu "Kurort Oberwiesenthal, Am Bahnhof". 

War das Absicht? Klingt irgendwie unwahrscheinlich, dass die Straße dort so heißt. Würde mich freuen, wenn du da nochmal drüberschauen kannst :) 

Grüße und weiterhin viel Spaß beim mappen. 

David

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5460495/history
SvenQ (2024-06-06 13:33:40+00:00): Hallo David,
da hast du tatsächlich recht. Keine Ahnung, warum ich damals diesen way mit erwischt habe, auf alle Fälle sollte es jetzt wieder passen.

Viele Grüße, Sven
dadavid (2024-06-06 14:34:48+00:00): super Sache, danke dir :)
eggie (2020-04-20 20:39:00+00:00): Oke... bicycle=designated kan er af.
Het is immers een fietspad. 
Tip: Op fietspaden kunnen de volgende tags. We kennen drie typen fietspaden. 
G11: mofa=yes, moped=no, traffic_sign=NL:G11
G12a: moped=designated, mofa=designated, traffic_sign=NL:G12a
G13: moped=no, mofa=no, traffic_sign=NL:G13
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Cycleway
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-04-20 20:47:29+00:00): De loop van het fietspad heb ik iets aangepast mbv de BGT omtrekgericht en bicycle= designated verwijderd.
BCNorwich (2020-04-21 07:03:00+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
I can see (from imagery) the position of a gate on the access road just north of a pond near to Oakridge Lane, I've mapped this adding access=agricultural to both gate and track.

I can't see where a gate is on Blackbirds Lane (I take it you mean the south end). Anyway OS Map and Hertfordshire Definitive map show the south section of Blackbirds Lane, (that you tagged as private) as being a way having public access. The existing OSM tagging states it as an unclassified road. Your putting access=private on the way implies there is no access to the public, which is incorrect. Yes the road may well be in private ownership as is almost all land (even highways) in the UK. But if you tag it as private you ought also tag the allowed access.
Further your private tag will hinder anyone in the future claiming any right over the way.
I've removed the private tag.

Regards Bernard.
Marco Caamano (2020-04-21 08:05:53+00:00): Thanks Bernard. I'm new to all this so appreciate your help and expertise! 

The gate with a big PRIVATE (hand written) sign is on the access road parallel to Blackbirds Lane, about 10m off Kemprow/Oakridge Lane.

The other gate, with the access code terminal, is on Blackbirds Lane, just before you reach the buildings. The pond you refer to is on the other side of these buildings. Interestingly, on the junction of Kemprow and Blackbirds Lane, there is another hand written sign saying 'No through road to Wall Hall, Sat Nav error'.

Next time I'm there, I'll take some pics (can I send them on here?) and ask around. I was in the middle of a ride and didn't want to be a nuisance to anyone given the signs, but feel like I now need to ask to be sure.

Thanks again
MC
Marco Caamano (2020-04-21 08:11:37+00:00): You can see both gates on Google Maps Street View...
Marco Caamano (2020-04-21 08:11:48+00:00): But without the signs!
BCNorwich (2020-04-22 14:04:29+00:00): Hello Marco,
Although we are all able to utilise Google Maps the data is copyright to Google and therefore not to be used in OSM. 
Please fee free to send pics if you think I can help, upload them somewher and send a link or direct to me BCNorwichOSM(at)gmail.com .

Regards Bernard.
Marco Caamano (2020-04-22 14:47:00+00:00): I emailed the owner of the farm in question, and he confirmed that there is, in fact, a kent carriage gap for cyclists to use... his words below:

Afternoon 
If you travel down blackbirds lane,on the right side of the gate is a Kent carriage gap which enables passage for bicycles but not cars,from this point you should carry straight on up the hill to the top where you should take a left along the track which will take you down hill onto crab lane 

Mystery solved.

Thanks for your help though and sorry for the trouble I caused you!

MC
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 13:23:04+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 11017655 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 15:28:17+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017661
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 19:26:13+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017668
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 20:53:35+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017665
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 22:12:44+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017656
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 22:19:58+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017660
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 22:33:25+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017667
mueschel (2020-04-21 07:54:31+00:00): HI,
you added two ways with many foreign tags, please check them:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794136467
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794136468
ArtOfTheTrek_Sayyed (2020-04-21 13:00:02+00:00): Many thanks,
I have fixed it now.
Sorry, I just forgot to handle it with the OSM tags.
mapman44 (2020-04-20 19:59:49+00:00): Thanks for adding the buildings. They'll look a lot neater though if the corners are square. Just select a building and press the Q key.
Frans S (2020-04-21 14:09:08+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping.
Please tag the path/highways in according to this wiki 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Most traces traces you mapped as residential are max 1.5 mtr wide. So Path is a better tag.I changed them.
Best regards and keep mapping
mapman44 (2020-04-20 19:55:36+00:00): Thanks for your edits. You may need to align your background satellite imagery to the existing streets in the area. Here's the Wiki page that explains why and how to do it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
VLD075 (2020-04-21 17:03:18+00:00): Hi mapman44,

 Thanks for the feedback 🙂 I have reverted my changes to match Mapbox Satellite imagery. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83893251

 Thank you,
 Michael
edvac (2020-08-27 09:28:13+00:00): Revertido changeset por tratarse dunha importación de datos non documentada nin aprobada.
mapman44 (2020-04-20 20:29:04+00:00): Thanks for adding the buildings. Just a tip...they'll look a lot neater with square corners. Here's the easy way: select a building and press the Q key. Thanks.
eggie (2020-04-20 20:54:36+00:00): Van dat overgebleven fietspad kun je tracktype=grade1 verwijderen. Dat is een bijkomende tag die bij een track hoort. 
grade1 betekent beton / asfalt . 
Denk dat het zo wel kan. 

Je moet eens overwegen om over te stappen naar ee volwassen editor als JOSM als je wilt doorzetten met OSM.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       
Zal even naar die kruising kijken.
Egie
eggie (2020-04-20 21:01:29+00:00): Kruising aangepast.. Het wordt laat.. ebn al een g kwijt in m'n naam zie ik. 
tracktype=grade1 verwijderd van fietspad.
eggie (2020-04-20 21:05:27+00:00): Wanneer je JOSM zou gebruiken kun je de transparante layer van de BGT omtrekgericht op je luchtfoto zetten. Dan zie je de paden precies lopen.
BGT implementeren 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021
Dan gaat er een wereld voor je open. 
Het lijkt ingewikkeld, maar het is eigenlijk heel simpel. Kom je er niet uit gewoon vragen. 
Eggie
Loekie1976 (2020-04-21 05:41:33+00:00): Wederom bedankt voor de hulp, ga naar JOSM kijken, want ik heb al de smaakt te pakken.
BCNorwich (2020-04-22 05:55:14+00:00): Hi,
Tags for the fence Way: 794155176 should be barrier=fence and fence_type=wire not just barrier=wire_fence as that is not recognised or rendered.
I've amended that fence line, are there more?
Regards Bernard.
m-a-p (2020-04-22 18:04:07+00:00): Hi Bernard,
I generally use Potlatch to edit the map and it uses the tag 'barrier=wire_fence'.  I assume that iD tags it as 'barrier=fence and fence_type=wire'?  I haven't used iD much as I dislike the way it does some things and find Potlatch easier.  So yes, most stock proof fences that I have drawn will be labelled as the former  - including numerous ones in the area that you've highlighted.
Marcus.
BCNorwich (2020-04-22 18:31:41+00:00): Hi Marcus,
First my apology.
I only use JOSM where you first pick barrier=fence then have the option to describe the fence type and height. So I had not come across a tag barrier=wire_fence before. I just tried barrier=wire_fence in JOSM and it is accepted.
It's a bit confusing also because two OSM Wiki pages https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dfence and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier advise to use 'barrier=fence and fence_type=wire'. Indeed one page advises to "verify if it could be tagged with another tag".

Sorry to have troubled you, Regards Bernard.
user_5359 (2020-04-21 04:12:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you real want four different relation, one only described by a name? Id you need help you are welcome.
Robert Whittaker (2020-04-25 10:59:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84100496 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 83840546 following consultation with mapper: Unlicensed source was used to add postbox ref=* tags.
GinaroZ (2020-04-20 22:15:34+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits :)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-20 20:10:42+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 83824313, 83824366, 83824562.
smootheFiets (2020-06-21 23:49:43+00:00): Review requested: all looks fine.  religion=none is an unusual usage of this key, but strikes me as appropriate here.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83841287
NetWormKido (2020-06-03 06:13:39+00:00): Привет, я тут мостики и броды за тобой исправляю. Там смысл в том, что нельзя рисовать одну дорогу поверх другой, просто разрезай существующую и добавляй на нужный участок теги моста или брода.
smootheFiets (2020-06-21 23:46:39+00:00): Hi linuxrev, since you've requested a review: I don't see a compelling reason to delete these trees from the map.  Why do they 'not make sense?'  I agree that they add very little to the map, which I guess is what you mean.  I would never add them to the map, myself.
But somebody did, so it behooves us to respect their work.  Importantly: those trees really are there (I can tell from aerial imagery).
Would you mind reverting this changeset?  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Change_rollback
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83841345
linuxrev (2020-06-29 17:31:03+00:00): Thanks. I will follow your comment.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83841345
linuxrev (2020-06-29 17:46:12+00:00): That is... I'd love to follow, but iD editor cannot undelete. Can you do it?
smootheFiets (2020-06-30 08:55:24+00:00): Sure thing: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87335842

Since you seem to know the area: comparing the map to PDOK aerial imagery, it looks like quite some landuse=forest, natural=forest, and/or natural=scrub has grown since the area was mapped.  If you wanted to update that, that would be very useful!
Come to think of it, it might have been better to not restore these 14 individual trees but to draw an area with landuse=forest, instead (looks like extra trees are growing inside the ring).  Sorry, I should've thought about this earlier.  

If you want to give that a go, I'll be happy to answer any questions you may have (although I'm not really an expert landuse mapper, myself).
user_5359 (2020-04-21 04:08:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Short inquiry to the key service_times: the services are held every day or only on Sundays? In the latter case add a Su (followed by space character) at the beginning of the value. Please notice also: We use the 24h notation for time informations.
letihu (2022-11-03 22:14:33+00:00): Keine tags auf dieser 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794168000/history
Linie?
Und diese Tore
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7427635821/history
und  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7427635819/history
mitten auf der Kreuzung?
chachafish (2020-04-21 01:08:10+00:00): Hello, can you make your edits closer together? This changeset covers four continents. Thanks :)
rkuris (2020-04-28 20:43:33+00:00): This is really hard to review. Please make your changeset smaller.

I'm trying to figure out what you changed on Isla Isabella in Mexico.
user_8161547 (2020-04-28 20:47:00+00:00): I apologize, I will delete my account. Thanks!
pangoSE (2021-12-19 09:07:51+00:00): hej!
jag undrar om det finns ett skäl till att du inte lagt adresserna på entrén i området här?
har du nått problem med att jag gör det?
Frans S (2020-04-21 13:00:17+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping
A remark.  Walls are not required to map on this project. Please focus on buildings, highways and waterways
Best regards
bxl-forever (2020-04-21 08:02:40+00:00): Hello,
I thought the proposal for the speed_pedelec key was still a draft.  The wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Belgium) still uses `moped_p`.
Has anything changed recently?
Thierry1030 (2020-04-21 20:53:04+00:00): hello, I posted your comment in the OSM chat group. Here's the reply from Joost Schouppe: "bxl-forever jumps by here from time to time. If you just say that you think it's a better tag, and that we're working towards replacing all the xx_p tags I don't think there'd be an issue. It sure is nice to have officially approved tags, but it is not obligatory"
In addition to this, the wiki mentions for the traffic sign "F99a" the tag "speed pedelec" and not "moped_p" like for the traffic sign "C3" ...
And as far as I am concernend, I find the tag "speed pedelec" much better and apparently it is in line with neighbouring countires ...
bxl-forever (2020-04-21 23:54:36+00:00): I believe you are right, thanks :-)
Frans S (2020-04-21 11:50:20+00:00): Hello Grace.
Thanks for mapping here.
since you are a new mapper validators ( like me) review your work to check if they are of good quality and in according to the instructions 
You mapped a highway in a small settlement and tagged it residential . When a highway is wide enough to carry cars ( 2 wheeltracks or over 2 mtr wide) call it unclassified. See the wiki how to tag highways 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
The highway you mapped is nearly 1 mtr wide, so path is a better tag. I changed it.
You did not map all building on your task square. Please complete these during your session. Others don't have to take another look there anymore.
You know that is important to square the rectangular buildings with the Q key ?
Best regards and keep mapping
Svalbard (2020-04-26 11:46:38+00:00): Hallo 2dann, bist Du sicher, dass der Gebäudeteil https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127655243
so schief ist? Du hast dem Gebäude den value „“service“ [1] gegeben. Das passt nicht, denn hier befinden sich die Kantine und ein großer Tagungsraum. Gruß Svalbard 

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dservice
muralito (2020-04-21 04:27:19+00:00): Las cosas son cancha de tenis, pero no se llaman "cancha de tenis", para describirlas ya estaban las otras etiquetas que tenia.
muralito (2020-04-21 04:24:25+00:00): Hola. Las cosas solo llevan nombre si efectivamente lo tienen, Eso que agregaste es un nombre descriptivo, no se usa, ya que se describe con las etiquetas que ya tenia.
TheAngryBird (2020-04-22 01:17:29+00:00): Do not create places and parks where they do not exist. All parks and the evidently fake places were removed.
Glassman (2020-04-20 23:39:30+00:00): TIP: Square building by selecting the outline then just type a "q"
TIP: Instead of using the name to describe the feature, use a tag instead, in this case use building=chapel. Use the name= tag for its proper name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83844535
pitscheplatsch (2020-04-21 05:12:14+00:00): Hi jsobers1, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting more or less the entire golf course? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=83844867

#GolfMapping
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
jsobers1 (2020-04-21 11:23:57+00:00): Hello!
I’m the one who added them in the first place, but did so incorrectly. I’m now in the process of adding everything back.
Frans S (2020-04-21 14:31:49+00:00): Hello Alicia. Thanks for mapping here.
I am reviewing tasks of (New) mappers and have some remarks.
* Please use the Maxar imagery. More recent than Bing and shows more buildings. (see the instructions)
*Always square each rectangular building with the Q key in iDeditor.
Buildings shows always a shadow what says that the object is above groundlevel and probably a building. Keep an eye on that. you mapped a few tiny objects as building, but they are not.
Best regards and keep mapping
AliciaCampbell (2020-04-21 21:28:46+00:00): Hi, can you help me switch my imagery from Bing to the Maxar imagery? Thanks!
Frans S (2020-04-22 12:11:06+00:00): Hi, Please take a look here
https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
chapter 
Configuring the Background Layer
 The whole course is worth reading and understanding.
Best regards
muralito (2020-04-21 21:08:13+00:00): Para remo se usa sport=rowing como dice en la wiki que tiene los valores posibles https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:sport?uselang=es
kapazao (2020-04-21 06:19:09+00:00): Hola, no sé si el nombre real del sendero es "Sendero Secreto" pero no lo parece.
No es necesario ponerle nombre a todo si lo desconoces o no es su nombre. Simplemente deberías dejarlo sin nombre.
Un saludo y gracias por tus contribuciones.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83845325
Frans S (2020-04-21 15:00:41+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A few remarks,
Please pay attention on the issue triangle in the right hand menu and solve the issues before uploading your work.You ignored 5 warnings.
Do not use the tag footway. Use the tag Path. Everything except vehicles >3 wheels uses this. Footway is designated for  pedestrians, 
See the highway wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
Please map your buildings more accurate, square each rectangular building with the Q key in iDeditor.
Also do not connect building nodes to other features like highways
Best regards and keep mapping
Hb- (2022-06-18 13:34:40+00:00): Die Korrektur war teilweise falsch. Die Straße Abser Deich befindet sich in der gleichnamigen Ortschaft.  Alsen liegt einen Kilometer südlich und dort dann auch die Straße "Alser Deich"  Möglicherweise bist Du einem falschen Hinweis aufgesessen. Erledigt mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/122547255
BeKri (2022-06-18 14:15:41+00:00): Servus,
Danke für den Hinweis und die Korrektur, bisserl her aber Hauptpunkt war die unterschiedliche Schreibweise
Alserdeich != Alser Deich
die ich angepaßt habe

Die (zu lange) Ausdehnung war vorher schon siehe

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=83845579
Happy tagging
muralito (2020-04-21 01:36:48+00:00): Aerial imapgery does not show the double ways you added.
geoJenn (2020-04-21 01:53:03+00:00): I removed them. Thank you.
AgusQui (2020-05-03 19:25:22+00:00): aca agregué lo que quisite mapear:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7476894426
roadfox (2020-05-30 14:17:58+00:00): This path does not exist. As it is on private property it should be deleted.
I'm courious, where does the information that there is a path come from?
Sibo Dolem (2020-05-30 23:05:14+00:00): It's an old path currently not actively maintained but still existing. Based on knowledge from local people it was discovered again. Same for the upper parte of the path between the road and the original trash deposit, that originally was a timber cutting path but used by local people getting down to Interlaken.
roadfox (2020-05-31 07:20:27+00:00): I walked it yesterday, there are no signs of and old path appart from some animal path traces. I can imagine that there was one in the past. But without talking to the landower it's problematic to have it in osm without according tagging. as many apps will route people up there. I wish there would be a direct path from Unterseen up, but we cannot just tag pathes even old ones in the hope it'll be accepted by todays land owners. If you wan't to leave them in tag them with abandoned: or access=no to avoid conflicts
Sibo Dolem (2020-05-31 15:00:26+00:00): Thats a good idea. I will tag it as private. I will also check the OSM wiki if there is a tag to specify it is currently not maintained.
roadfox (2020-05-31 16:21:41+00:00): There is: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abandoned: i'm aware of
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-11-04 09:29:18+00:00): Hallo BeKri,
ich habe gerade den Straßenname annahnd von Mapillary-Bildern angeglichen (ohne Bindestriche). Sieh auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2383231

Jetzt sehe ich erst Deine Notiz. Welche Quellen hast Du für den Straßenname?

Viele Grüße
BeKri (2020-11-04 14:55:16+00:00): Servus OSM_RogerWilco,

Grundlage war 
https://github.com/RicoElectrico/mismatched_street_name_validator
das findet (fand, leider keine laufende Version mehr) benachbarte unterschiedlich geschreibene Straßenabschnitte.

Im dem Fall habe ich mir wohl über die Histroy der Abschnitte versucht ein Bild zu machen. Ich war NICHT vor Ort und habe KEINE Bilder umgesetzt.

Wenn er vor Ort anders ist bitte ändern und mein (dann missverständliche) note
rausschmeissen.
Und klingt vielleicht ab bisserl plämpläm .. Bitte ALLE Straßenanschnitte erwischen, sinst hängt wieder ein Abschnitt anders geschreiben drin.
(war zu 90% das Problem)
Danke Dir Gruss derBeKri
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-11-19 08:38:56+00:00): Hallo Bekri,
danke für Deine Rückmeldung. Habe die Notiz gelöscht und nochmal alle Staßenabschnitte kontrolliert.
Gruß
Roger Wilco
Allison P (2020-04-21 03:21:15+00:00): I noticed that you removed is_in=* from objects, but not subkeys such as is_in:country_code=*. Is there any particular reason for that, or did Osmose not catch it
?
mapman44 (2020-04-21 03:26:17+00:00): Osmose identifies only one error at a time. Sometimes I go ahead and remove the others but not always. The next time through Osmose will identify one more, etc. Feel free to delete the others if you want. They are all deprecated.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-03 00:29:43+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 11018256 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
wireguy (2020-04-21 01:37:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM Jake!   The 'Q' key will square the corners on buildings.   Rectangles look better with squared corners.
mapman44 (2020-04-21 02:43:50+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
mapman44 (2020-04-21 02:41:10+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery
user_5359 (2020-04-21 03:51:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
SomeoneElse (2020-04-21 15:09:12+00:00): (for info see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3651 )
ndm (2020-04-21 12:15:49+00:00): Why did you add "access=destination" there's no signage on Bing Streetside to indicate that.