piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mannivu (2020-10-14 15:05:33+00:00): Ciao. Quando aggiungi il commento a un gruppo di modifiche ricordati di essere più preciso, spiegando cosa hai fatto nella modifica. "Vailate" non è molto chiaro. Vedi anche https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92479716
PaoloLombardi (2020-10-14 17:04:56+00:00): Grazie mille delle info!
Con "Vailate" non capisco a cosa ti riferisci in questo gruppo di modifiche.
Per quanto riguarda il discorso dei "commenti" avrei qualcosa da obiettare. Primo perché chi modifica con ID non ha la possibilità di "escludere" il commento (cosa invece possibile con un'App come "GoMap!!"). Secondo perché se inizio a modificare a "random" ed in zone diverse una strada, un edificio, un'area verde, un nodo di un sentiero, una curva di un corso d'acqua ecc. penso sia comprensibile che è difficile cosa commentare.
Sono "varie modifiche a tanti elementi" con unico salvataggio pertanto penso che il "sintetizzare" con "Correzioni" sia il minimo. Non è possibile scrivere un "poema" per tutto quello che si fa.
Sperando sia comprensibile tutto ciò su una piattaforma come OSM in cui a mio modesto avviso le "lacune" sono ben altre. Saluti.
Mannivu (2020-10-14 17:43:50+00:00): "Vailate" è colpa mia. Ho copiato da un altro mio commento a un changeset e non ho modificato quel pezzo. Un commento dovrebbe spiegare cosa è stato modificato, per far capire agli altri utenti senza per forza aprire il changeset (prova a pensare se un utente cerca la modifica a una relazione: se ci sono dei commenti chiari, sarà più facile trovare la modifica in questione, mentre una sfilza di "Correzioni" è piuttosto oscura). Non è necessario fare tante modifiche ogni volta, si possono fare piccole modifiche, salvare il changeset e mettere un commento esplicativo.
PaoloLombardi (2020-10-14 18:16:53+00:00): Certamente lo scopo è quello. Ma come detto sopra un'App come "GoMap!!" ritiene "opzionale" il commento e comprendo tale scelta poiché sul campo, tra traffico dati e consumo batteria, diventa forse cosa complicata perché non c'è davvero tempo. E ho mappato davvero tanto con quell'App!!
Pertanto su ID mi sembra corretto scrivere almeno "Correzioni" e non mettere un semplice "." (punto).
Per quanto riguarda la scelta di fare "multi modifiche " in un unico salvataggio...beh spero non ci sia da "puntualizzare" anche su questo perché la permanenza su OSM rischia di diventare "pesante". PS. Dico ciò perché la metà delle mie "multi modifiche" sono solo di correzioni di mapping altrui e sta diventando "snervante" la cosa.
Mannivu (2020-10-14 18:21:36+00:00): Beh, inviare modifiche senza alcun commento è pure peggio, quindi mi sembra strano che l'app non richieda un commento anche minimo (ma non l'ho mai usata, quindi mi fido delle tue parole). OSM è un progetto collaborativo e parte della collaborazione arriva anche facendo capire subito agli altri utenti cosa è stato fatto in una modifica. Correggere il mapping altrui fa parte di questo progetto collaborativo (ti faccio inoltre notare che gli "errori" potrebbero non essere tali, ma potrebbero essere dati inseriti quando le informazioni erano differenti).
PaoloLombardi (2020-10-15 12:12:24+00:00): Ma non è vero! Anzi si lavora ugualmente bene! Infatti "GoMap!!" lo ritiene come scelta opzionale perché indubbiamente quello che conta alla fine è il "dato" inserito e spesso è successo di leggere un commento e scoprire che tanto il dato inserito era comunque differente dalla realtà. Quindi in talune occasioni leggere o scrivere commenti è altro tempo perso (consumo batteria e traffico dati)
Qui non ho fatto alcun accenno ad "errori" poiché so che i dati mutano nel tempo ma un conto è l'aggiornamento del dato nel tempo...un conto è errore di inserimento dati quindi già sbagliato dall'inizio.
E la cosa più snervante è prendere e partire per andare in loco a "verificare" (quindi oltre al consumo di batteria + traffico dati mettiamoci anche quello del carburante). Ma qualcuno deve pur farlo questo "sporco lavoro" e pososo garantire che il "problema" dei "commenti" rimane all'ultimo posto.
Mannivu (2020-10-15 12:33:01+00:00): Mah, guarda. Dire che il commento del proprio operato "è inutile" non mi sembra un comportamento adatto a un progetto collaborativo.
PaoloLombardi (2020-10-15 16:19:09+00:00): Ok se non è corretto dire "inutile" comunque non è "obbligatorio" a seconda del dispositivo che si usa. Non è una questione di "opinione personale". Ma di logica che sta dietro a questo progetto. 
Oramai inizio a pensare che gran parte delle "attenzioni" (le vostre e non le mie!) sono rivolte alla "logica informatica" che fa stare in piedi una piattaforma come OSM. Ok va bene! Ma intanto le strade (guarda caso si chiama opneSTREETmap), almeno nell'area geografica dove vivo, rimangono disegnate MALE (imbarazzante!) per non dire mancanti (escluse quelle di recente costruzione). Se OSM perde "audience" sono sicuro che la causa sarà da cercare proprio qui. Un saluto.
kucai (2021-08-08 13:09:19+00:00): Bos,
camna tau way 424117462 ni jalan sehala? Kalau tgk maxar premium nampak macam dua hala.
GrabMY_FaizDjamil (2021-08-09 02:46:18+00:00): dari Grab office Kuantan bos. pertukaran aliran trafik dari majlis perbandaran. Nanti saya tanya dorg balik kalau ada pertukaran baru
kucai (2021-08-09 02:54:55+00:00): alright. elok taruk note sekali kalau mende tu berlainan daripada imagery yang ada, takut ada org lain pulak usik.
MatthieuGD (2020-10-14 19:10:18+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

Un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Matthieu

PS : Deux liens souvent utiles :
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
BCNorwich (2020-10-16 07:39:57+00:00): Hi, Could you please be careful not to make duplicate sections of highway, (placing highway atop of highway). I've just corrected five in the Lynn area.

Regards Bernard.
eggie (2020-10-14 15:59:22+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-10-14 16:11:38+00:00): Het Kadaster ziet dit als een gebouw.. Ik heb nu het gebouw weer terugezet als building:part=yes
Het zal dan niet renderen als gebouw. 

MVG,
Eggie
Nakaner (2021-08-16 13:09:57+00:00): Hallo,

du hast in diesem Änderungssatz an der B 4 bei Meine (Kreis Gifhorn) das Vorhandensein eines baulich getrennten Radwegs erfasst. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/71361053/history

Leider ist das so nicht ganz richtig. Der Radweg war schon als eigenständiger Way erfasst. Da wir Dinge nur einmal in OSM erfassen, heißt das, dass nicht auch noch cycleway:left=track erfasst wird. Stattdessen erfassen wir bei solch einem Straßenstück dann cycleway:left=separate, um das Vorhandensein, aber als separates OSM-Objekt anzugeben.

Könntest du das bitte bei Gelegenheit korrigieren und dir auch die anderen Objekte anschauen, die du in der letzten Zeit bearbeitet hast und an die du dich noch erinnerst?

Weil es thematisch eng verwandt ist: Mit bicycle=use_sidepath an der Fahrbahn kann man auch ein Radfahrverbot auf der Fahrbahn erfassen, das sich aus einem benutzungspflichtigen Radweg (blaue Schilder, also Zeichen 237, 240 oder 241) ergibt.

Viele Grüße

Michael
girub (2021-10-31 17:53:28+00:00): Tut mir leid, das habe ich beim durchfahren nicht erkannt. StreetComplete hat aber jetzt auch bessere Möglichkeiten für die Beschreibung.
Habe es geändert. Da ich vor einem Jahr dort war, ist mir leider aber nichts anderes aufgefallen. 
Viele Grüße
girub
mavl (2020-10-20 16:42:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
stephankn (2020-10-17 09:49:54+00:00): please do not use OSM for testing purposes. Way 858964360 is no tertiary highway.
eggie (2020-10-14 16:07:58+00:00): Dag Danny.. Beter geen adressen veranderen.
De info heb ik samengevoegd met de geïmporteerde BAG adresnode. 

MVG,
Eggie
Danny020 (2020-10-14 16:38:48+00:00): Dan klopt er volgens mij iets anders niet. Het huisnummer van Dany's foodcorner is 820 en niet 822
eggie (2020-10-14 18:39:00+00:00): Oke Danny, maar dat is dan ook precies waar de poi mee verbonden is.
Zodra er een bedrijf getagd is zie je het 'adresnummer ' niet.
nr 822 ligt er naast op de kaart
De meeste kaarten laten geen adressen zien. Dat doet de standaardkaart als een van de weinige. 
Zoekslag: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2797630589

MVG,
Eggie
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-10-09 20:25:57+00:00): You added some man_made=drinking fountain

I am writing to you as I also tried using this tag, discovered some problems with it (and other drinking water point tagging), and want to improve situation. I started from recommending to not use this tag as it has some problems and is a trap (partially due to English being confusing). Discussion takes place on tagging mailing list, and it is best to comment there ( see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_mailing_list for some hints how to join ).

See https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-October/thread.html#65730 for the thread

Currently no one opposed and I plan to describe it as deprecated at OSM Wiki.

If you think that it is a bad idea for some reason - let me know (for example, full scale deprecation proposal could be done)

The man_made=drinking fountain is for example at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7988132435/history
mavl (2020-10-20 16:42:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
Renaud Lavoie (2020-10-20 18:16:27+00:00): All of these changes need to be re-evaluated or reverted. You were mistaken, as most of these roads are frontage roads with at-grade intersections and direct access to businesses. In those cases, they need to go back to secondary road. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Frontage_road
AerosV (2020-10-20 19:24:20+00:00): Thanks, I agree. All these changes need to be reverted. Since the article doesn't talk about highways, I didn't read it. Do you know if there's a way to tag them as highway service roads ?
Renaud Lavoie (2020-10-20 19:36:27+00:00): There is no tag for service roads. Just put them back to secondary as they were before.
Hungerburg (2020-10-14 21:32:09+00:00): Die vielen Innsbrucks scheinen mir übertrieben - auf dem Ausdruck vom Fahrplan steht das so, an der Haltestelle steht es aber ohne den Namen der Stadt. Ist ja redundant, nicht?
muchichka_s (2020-10-24 13:39:26+00:00): Hi, Burricane

Why did you remove the roundboat tag? There are roundbout signposts on this junction.
muchichka_s (2020-10-24 13:58:43+00:00): So far I have returned it, but if you have a serious reason, you are free to remove it, just write an explanation in the comments. In any case, thank you for your colaboration

Best regards, muchichka_s
muchichka_s (2020-10-24 15:34:28+00:00): I explored this place in more detail. And indeed the road services removed roundabout signs in 2018.
Left a circular by analogy with the canonical example, which is referred in the wiki
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/52.51852/13.42796
And where there are also no a roundabout signs

Sorry for distub
GeoidDude (2020-10-26 23:39:24+00:00): Hi muchichka_s, Burricane is not currently on our editing team, so I’ll pick up communication on this changeset. Another detail we often reference when considering the `junction=roundabout` tag, is which vehicles have the right of way. According to the OSM policy page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Droundabout) this is the defining characteristic of a roundabout, that vehicles within the junction have the right of way. I hope this helps!
Pikse (2020-11-17 15:48:01+00:00): Paljassaare põik ei pööra veepuhastusjaama juures läände ega ulatu samanimelise bussipeatuseni[1]. Parandasin tagasi muudatusega  94288996[2].

[1] https://xgis.maaamet.ee/xgis2/page/app/adsavalik
[2] https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/61910017
mavl (2020-10-20 16:42:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
chnav (2020-10-26 07:39:27+00:00): Здравствуйте, в этой правке вы удалили много зданий в Павлодаре, которые отчётливо видны на снимках Sentinel-2 от 20/10/2020. Такие правки в ОСМ неприемлемы. Если вас не устраивает геометрия или адреса зданий их необходимо отредактировать, но не удалять. Все здания восстановлены обратно, геометрия исправлена.
Fluffy89502 (2020-10-16 20:45:33+00:00): Can you explain your reasoning? I don't understand what you mean by "this region generally uses trunk to mean expressway." Who is "this region?" Anyways, the wiki definition clearly indicates that his is eligible to be designated as a trunk as it is not paralleled by an interstate and is a major route for the Owens Valley and high desert.
SomeoneElse (2020-10-16 21:48:00+00:00): If it helps, from the perspective of a non-local tourist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26401651 past Mono Lake and north seemed to me more like a primary (in the rest of CA) than a trunk (in the rest of CA).
Cheers,
Andy
clay_c (2020-10-17 00:57:20+00:00): I've driven on this highway. If I'm planning a route through the Eastern Sierras, it's helpful for me to know which parts are expressway-grade vs. two-lane road so I know where I'll have chances to pass slower vehicles.
Fluffy89502 (2020-10-17 23:14:05+00:00): I understand your reasoning but that has nothing to do with the significance of the road right? Without the 395 Mono County would be deserted.
btwhite92 (2020-10-17 23:59:19+00:00): Hi Fluffy,
I'm not really sure why the wiki states that the "importance" definition is more commonly used in the west - by visual inspection of the map, it appears to be most common in the south (noting, importantly, that most of the road miles tagged trunk are built to expressway standards). 

There has been years of debate over the "proper" usage of the 'trunk' tag in the US with no true consensus established. I am sympathetic to the argument that the 'trunk' tag would be better used in the US to tag major inter-city routes not serviced by a freeway. I have argued it to talk-us on multiple occasions. It makes sense to have a distinct tag for freeways given that they are clearly defined with a checklist of requirements (divided, full access control, full grade separation, access by ramps only). However, expressways tend to be fuzzier in the US and come in many shapes and sizes since they are not standardized nationally. I think the "best" way to negotiate this would be to orthogonalize route importance (using 'highway') and expressway construction standard (full, super-two, partial, etc) using an 'expressway' tag as proposed here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:expressway.

A couple years ago, I bumped a number of major routes in the SW area of the US up to 'trunk' on this definition (US 395, 95; CA 70/99, 299). I have since bumped them back down due to the lack of consensus on this tagging scheme, deferring instead to the expressway definition given that the definition is more common (both in the US and the world over) and has a longer history of use in the US. I typically use 'trunk' to tag divided, partially grade separated highways as well as fully access controlled two-lane roads (see CA 108 and others). I think this definition is still reasonably robust and respects the lack of consensus as well as the history of the usage of the tag.

There is also reasonable evidence that the "importance" definition came into existence in the US when a user NE2 unilaterally bumped all US routes up to 'trunk' and added the "importance" clauses in the wiki (this can be verified by looking through wiki page history for highway tagging). OSM uses a consensus-based decision making process, so I don't think it's necessarily fair to carry artifacts of this unilateral edit into the present without the US community in general being on board, which I don't believe is the case as of now.

You are certainly welcome to argue your case for the 'importance' definition to talk-us, but it has been done many times without much success in the way of establishing consensus. It's frustrating, to be sure.
mavl (2020-10-20 16:42:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:42:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:42:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:42:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
dval (2020-10-15 13:42:05+00:00): Hi, Romario Slayter! Сообщество ОСМеров (в моём лице) приветствует вас и желает успехов в рисовании карты! Опыт приходит со временем, и для его приобретения полезно прислушиваться к тем, кто здесь уже не первый год. Так хочу заметить, что ваш домик расположен не на месте, а также имеет размеры, скорее не дома, а гаража для мотоцикла, кроме того его углы не равны 90 градусов. Поищите в ОСМВики, подумайте, как сделать так, чтобы избегать подобных недочётов в будущем. Есть мощный редактор для рисования карт JOSM; также установите подложку (космоснимки) Maxar, они более свежие. Желаю успехов!
hocu (2020-10-15 07:53:57+00:00): Hi, thanks for the contribution.

Is "Change money" really this exchange's name, or is it more like a description? If it's a description, it should be in the description field. If the editor you're using does not have a description field, you shouldn't add it as a name. Please remember, name field is for official or locally known names.

Keep contributing, this map grows with your help. Cheers
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92484771
zuicz (2020-10-20 07:04:58+00:00): Kopiowanie danych z Google Maps jest zabronione. Zmiana została PONOWNIE wycofana
mavl (2020-10-20 16:42:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:42:03+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
4004 (2021-04-04 19:34:41+00:00): hi, why is access to the service station private? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/859020322/history
Thomas8122 (2020-10-16 16:12:15+00:00): Rothenkirchen ist doch ein Ortsteil von Steinberg und nicht andersrum, oder hab ich was verpasst!?
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:59+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
dentonny (2021-02-14 08:01:26+00:00): Beste,

Mag ik vragen wanneer u hiermee verder gaat?

mvg
Jorisbo (2021-02-15 06:39:14+00:00): Hallo Tonny, bedankt voor de herinnering, die ben ik idd vergeten. Moest ineens weg en heb op opslaan gedrukt. Stroomrichting moest ook nog worden omgedraaid dacht ik en tunnels toegevoegd en zo. Ik  zal er eens naar kijken. gr Joris
Jorisbo (2021-02-15 18:27:54+00:00): Hallo Tonny, heb eea bijgewerkt, als er iets nog niet helemaal goed mocht zijn voel je vrij om het dan aan te passen. gr Joris
FraukeLeo (2020-11-09 08:17:16+00:00): Hi holger0700, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433140461 sollte sicher nicht komplett Brücke werden, oder? Was war gemeint?
ansuta (2020-10-14 21:17:58+00:00): Creo que el problema son las restricciones de giro, no el tipo de vía. Lo miraré porque hay una restricción dirección Biescas que no es correcta. Saludos
user_5359 (2020-10-15 03:10:51+00:00): Hello again! Please use building instead of "building:"
Sara kishimiza (2020-10-16 13:04:31+00:00): building
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:46+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:43+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:39+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
FraukeLeo (2022-05-22 16:12:58+00:00): Hallo EinEngener, es ist sicher keine Verbesserung, wenn man einem Campingplatz das tourism-Tag wegnimmt und durch ein nichtssagendes area=yes ersetzt :)
fpagenk (2020-10-16 00:05:17+00:00): Hallo zym123hp,
Willkommen auf OpenStreetMap und vielen Dank für deinen Beitrag! Ein kleiner Hinweis: Du hast anscheinend in dem selben Änderungssatz sowohl Änderungen in Dresden als auch in Gaoyang vorgenommen. Das führt dazu, dass sich der Änderungssatz über die halbe Welt erstreckt, was nicht so gern gesehen wird (Es kann nämlich passieren, dass jetzt ein OSM-Nutzer sich anschauen möchte, welche Änderungen in Rumänien gemacht wurden, und dann deinen Änderungssatz findet, obwohl der gar nichts damit zu tun hat).
Es ist also allgemein besser, wenn ein Änderungssatz Änderungen beinhaltet, die irgendwie in Verbindung zueinander stehen und geographisch begrenzt sind. Vielleicht kannst du das ja in Zukunft bedenken.

Weiterhin viel Spaß beim Kartieren und Viele Grüße, fpagenk
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
mdelatorre (2020-10-17 04:15:05+00:00): I reviewed your changeset and determined is BAD.

Mejora el trazado de tus edificios para que queden ortogonales. Te recomiendo utilizar el editor JOSM que te permite realizar trazado de edificios más facilmente.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92486842
Puxan (2020-10-15 15:29:08+00:00): @[berini]
Muy bien, sigue mapeando.    Joaquim
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92486924
mavl (2020-10-20 16:41:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.  
Please, see also:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92572328  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/92661045
wille (2020-10-14 21:41:06+00:00): Obrigado por corrigir a edição indevida!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/92488342