piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_1566574 (2023-04-12 12:14:23+00:00): Il y avait de bonnes infos à copier/coller sur l'objet historique malgré tout...
Merci de la réactivité/réponse !
Syl (2022-12-03 08:13:03+00:00): Bonjour, vous n'avez pas ajouté de tag pour décrire ce que c'est, pouvez-vous corriger ?

Et sinon, où en êtes-vous de la documentation sur le wiki de vos activités (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Organised_Editing_Guidelines) ?
mariotomo (2022-10-13 13:34:36+00:00): hola Renato Lapio. qui a Panamá è preferibile utilizzare Maxar piuttosto che Mapbox. però grazie per porre l'attenzione a questo dettaglio. se vuoi validare quello che ho cambiato, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127471220
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:48:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:11:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:34:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:23:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:38:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:04:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:17:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:27:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:46:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
HellMap (2023-07-19 15:09:23+00:00): Hi!

Could you clarify the source for the https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10096988863 name? I can't find anything online.

Thanks
soshial (2023-07-19 15:35:01+00:00): Hey! I don't know any official sources either, but we simply call this hill like this. The hill is an attraction I'd say, since it really stands out.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-05 00:19:27+00:00): DWG revert:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142166937
Jakka (2022-10-14 07:05:15+00:00): Graag de exacte locatie?
Scout Jens (2022-10-14 10:09:02+00:00): Vielen Dank! Ich kann nicht mehr sagen, warum ich nicht alle Eigenschaften auf das Gebäude übertragen habe.
MarkusHD (2022-10-14 17:53:45+00:00): Sowas passiert halt mal, kein Problem!
Dimitar155 (2022-11-25 16:36:43+00:00): Hello Rassow,

Can you verify the railway:signal:direction tag of https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1834082659? Reverse is not a valid value for it. It should be either forward or backward.

Best wishes,
Dimitar
GPar (2022-10-13 09:39:44+00:00): Hi, 
this pillar dosn't exist. Seem to be confused with a red new jersey .
Pls check the script ...tks 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.202017&lng=7.6215050999984&z=17&pKey=823190782033515&focus=photo&dateTo=2022-10-13&dateFrom=2022-09-01&x=0.8245041847699285&y=0.5451438458517892&zoom=3
kmpoppe (2022-10-13 09:50:16+00:00): Hi,

you might be right, but there is nothing wrong with the script.

The script does exactly one thing: Change the ID of the "mapillary" key from the old to the new ID. Somebody mistook the red thingy for a fire_hydrant and mapped it according to the picture (alas, it's unwise to do so if one has never been in the area).

Just delete the object if it doesn't exist, I don't mind, but the script is working as intended. The source data is obviously off from the real world.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
RedAuburn (2022-12-15 17:16:13+00:00): thank you for your contributions! 

I'd just like to advise not adding names like "football pitch" to sport pitches, this info isn't actually the name and can be inferred through the sport=soccer tag :)

some further info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only
traveleditor (2022-10-13 07:42:33+00:00): changeset comment is supposed to be "adding forest incomplete"
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
gscholz (2022-10-14 06:59:09+00:00): Hi gaia_bucci,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping rivers:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=water&lon=-54.11901&lat=-12.45286&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=riverbank_areas%2Cwater_areas%2Ccoastline%2Cwaterways_drain%2Cwaterways_canal%2Cwaterways_stream%2Cwaterways_river%2Cwaterways_riverbank%2Cwaterways_other%2Cwaterrelations_drain%2Cwaterrelations_canal%2Cwaterrelations_stream%2Cwaterrelations_river%2Cwaterrelations_riverbank%2Cwaterrelations_other%2Cwaterways_in_tunnels%2Cwaterways_on_bridges%2Cwaterways_width%2Cwaterways_width_error%2Cwaterways_without_names%2Cwaterway_nodes%2Cwaterway_nodes_direction_error%2Cwaterway_nodes_name_error%2Cwaterway_nodes_type_error%2Cwaterway_nodes_spring_error%2Cwaterway_nodes_end_error%2Crivermouths%2Coutflows%2Criverbank_areas%2Cwater_areas%2Ccoastline%2Cwaterways_drain%2Cwaterways_canal%2Cwaterways_stream%2Cwaterways_river%2Cwaterways_riverbank%2Cwaterways_other%2Cwaterrelations_drain%2Cwaterrelations_canal%2Cwaterrelations_stream%2Cwaterrelations_river%2Cwaterrelations_riverbank%2Cwaterrelations_other%2Cwaterways_in_tunnels%2Cwaterways_on_bridges%2Cwaterways_width%2Cwaterways_width_error%2Cwaterways_without_names%2Cwaterway_nodes%2Cwaterway_nodes_direction_error%2Cwaterway_nodes_name_error%2Cwaterway_nodes_type_error%2Cwaterway_nodes_spring_error%2Cwaterway_nodes_end_error%2Crivermouths%2Coutflows

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127452837

I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please be more careful with your edits and contact your YouthMappers tutor to learn more.
Kind regards
Guido
JJIglesias (2022-10-13 17:48:53+00:00): Saludos y gracias por editar. El Lago Uru Uru ya es un elemento existente en el Mapa NO se necesita duplicarlo. Vamos a proceder a borrarlo para q no haya superposicion.
Favor visitar https://learnosm.org
JJIglesias (2022-10-13 17:58:25+00:00): Saludos y gracias por editar. El Lago Uru Uru ya es un elemento existente en el Mapa NO se necesita duplicarlo. Vamos a proceder a borrarlo para q no haya superposicion.
Favor visitar https://learnosm.org
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
nyampire (2022-10-19 08:34:05+00:00): OSMへようこそ！　編集をレビューしました。

とてもよく描けていると思います。
これからもぜひ、いろいろな対象をマッピングしてみてください。

Happy Mapping！
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127453134
JJIglesias (2022-10-13 17:42:14+00:00): Saludos y gracias por editar. El Lago Uru Uru ya es un elemento existente en el Mapa NO se necesita duplicarlo. Vamos a proceder a borrarlo para q no haya superposicion.
Favor visitar https://learnosm.org 

Gracias
JJIglesias (2022-10-13 17:48:43+00:00): Saludos y gracias por editar. El Lago Poopo ya es un elemento existente en el Mapa NO se necesita duplicarlo. Vamos a proceder a borrarlo para q no haya superposicion.
Favor visitar https://learnosm.org
ivanbranco (2022-10-13 09:39:38+00:00): Ciao Gumik_

perché hai tolto il prefisso internazionale a "Fattoria la Torre"?

davvero il negozio di giocatoli ha come nome "Il nome"?
gscholz (2022-10-14 07:04:25+00:00): Hi roberta_baldassarre,
this changeset has destroyed the wood area relation 12019783:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12019783/history

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127453398

I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please be more careful with your edits and contact your YouthMappers tutor to learn more.
Kind regards
Guido
JJIglesias (2022-10-13 17:49:34+00:00): Saludos y gracias por editar. El Lago y Salar de Copaisa ya son un elemento existente en el Mapa NO se necesita duplicarlo. Vamos a proceder a borrarlo para q no haya superposicion.
Favor visitar https://learnosm.org
ovruni (2022-10-14 03:15:06+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se ha agregado un lago sobre otro ya existente, por lo que he revertido el conjunto de cambios. Si tienes alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puedes realizar consultas por el canal de telegram de la comunidad peruana https://t.me/osmpe
Saludos
Dawid2849 (2022-10-14 18:39:21+00:00): Dzięki!
JJIglesias (2022-10-13 17:50:40+00:00): Saludos y gracias por editar. La laguna Aguallamaya ya es un elemento existente en el Mapa NO se necesita duplicarlo. Vamos a proceder a borrarlo para q no haya superposicion.
Favor visitar https://learnosm.org
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:51:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:56:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
JJIglesias (2022-10-13 17:54:31+00:00): Saludos y gracias por editar. La Laguna Sakewa ya es un elemento existente en el Mapa NO se necesita duplicarlo. Vamos a proceder a borrarlo para q no haya superposicion.
Favor visitar https://learnosm.org
gscholz (2022-10-14 06:13:34+00:00): Hi samuela_palmisano,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database like self intersecting lines and overlapping water areas:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-55.18254&lat=-14.79538&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127454468

I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please be more carefull with your edits. Please contact your "YouthMappers" teacher to learn more.
Kind regards
Guido
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:49:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
JJIglesias (2022-10-13 17:56:40+00:00): Saludos y gracias por editar. El cuerpo de agua q agregaste ya es un elemento existente en el Mapa NO se necesita duplicarlo. Vamos a proceder a borrarlo para q no haya superposicion.
Favor visitar https://learnosm.org
mariotomo (2022-10-14 23:36:35+00:00): Buongiorno Maria GIuliani. Non so chi ti stia assessorando, però ti suggerisco di sollecitare aiuto. Qui (aggiungendo un oggetto già esistente in Bolivia) hai menzionato un progetto teachosm che si riferisce ad un'area abbastanza distante, in Brasile. Il responsabile del progetto difficilmente si accorgerà di doverti dare una mano.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127454508
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:47:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:55:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 08:53:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127558159, 127559578 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
julcnx (2022-10-13 10:27:27+00:00): Thanks for your contributions! I see you have re-aligned many roads, and you are using Bing, please be aware that roads should be ideally aligned based on GPS traces (overlay in iD) and that Bing has often misalignment issues. Maxar is generally the best alternative imagery and can be chosen from the backgrounds menu in iD editor. For more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Aerial_imagery

ขอบคุณสำหรับการมีส่วนร่วมของคุณ! ฉันเห็นว่าคุณได้ปรับแนวถนนหลายสายแล้ว และคุณกำลังใช้ Bing โปรดทราบว่าถนนควรได้รับการจัดตำแหน่งให้เหมาะสมตามรอย GPS (การซ้อนทับใน ID) และ Bing มักมีปัญหาการวางแนวไม่ตรงแนว โดยทั่วไปแล้ว Maxar จะเป็นภาพทางเลือกที่ดีที่สุด และสามารถเลือกได้จากเมนูพื้นหลังในโปรแกรมแก้ไข iD ข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Aerial_imagery
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127455127
jcr83 (2022-10-13 13:34:56+00:00): Bonjour
Etes-vous certain que les bus sont guidés (cf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway=bus%20guideway?uselang=fr) ?
uMatt-5 (2022-10-13 13:47:08+00:00): Bonjour,
Il s'agit bien d'une voie de bus, je me suis arrêté quand j'ai eu un doute, mais le tracé publié j'en suis sûr.

Si vous avez des raisons de modifier mon tracé, n'hésitez pas !

Merci.
jcr83 (2022-10-13 14:18:03+00:00): Oui, je suis d'accord, mais vous avez indiqué que c'est un bus avec guidage automatique : est-ce bien le cas ? Sinon, il faut remettre highway=service.
Je cite: "Les bus guidés sont des bus qui sont guidés sur au moins une portion de leur itinéraire, par des moyens physiques" et "Attention: ne pas utiliser sur des voies bus classiques dédiés, dans ce cas plutot préférer highway=service access=no bus=yes."
uMatt-5 (2022-10-13 14:31:44+00:00): Oh ! d'accord, excusez moi c'est une erreur de ma part, merci de me l'avoir signalé
adiatmad (2022-10-13 08:56:26+00:00): Good day aiswaryaabhilash!

Your edits look great. But it will be better to avoid adding a generic name (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/804557674). Maybe you want to check this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:10:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
eggie (2022-10-13 15:54:54+00:00): Lijkt me oke... maar hoe komen hier fietsen binnen als de trap geen gootje ramp=no heeft?   (ramp:bicycle=yes  ? )
Gr eggie
Frans S (2022-10-16 10:15:24+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Please avoid that nodes of buildings link to other buildings or roads.
The residential area, you mapped here, crosses buildings. This gives an error.
Just move the area line to the open area.
Best regards



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127456054
Gonéo (2022-10-24 07:35:40+00:00): Bonjour, 
Dans ces modifications il y a des highway=cycleway qui sont devenus des highway=path. Hors d'après le wiki "En milieu urbain, il est préférable d’utiliser highway=footway (avec bicycle=yes si nécessaire) sur les aménagements principalement destinés à un usage piéton."
Il semble (mais je ne suis pas certain que ce soit la cause) que GéoVélo n'apprécie pas et ne sait plus faire de routage vélo par le pont de la Mulatière dans le sens sud->nord
TitiABCD (2022-10-24 10:42:58+00:00): Merci de ta vigilance.
J'ai pas vu cette information sur le wiki.
Si c'est le cas, il faut corriger ;)
En fait, à la base, j'ai supprimer le doublon piéton/vélo quand les chemins étaient partagés, car ça provoquait des indications problématiques sur Géovelo (gauche/droite intempestifs).

(Normalement, on doit pas mapper en fonction du rendu. C'est plus un pb de Géovelo que OSM)
Mais si on bloque le trajet vélo, il faut quand même corriger
TitiABCD (2022-10-24 10:44:19+00:00): C'est pas principalement piéton : en fait c'est un bout de la ViaRhona. Donc c'est le deux, d'où la transformation en path...
SomeoneElse (2022-10-20 15:43:56+00:00): Thanks for spotting this, but I actually meant "leaf_type" of course!
Tilia_J (2022-10-13 12:29:54+00:00): Volgens mij loopt de privétrack hier gewoon dood. Nu heb je deze met de Delerweg verbonden door de track het wildraster te laten kruisen zónder een barrier=gate toe te voegen.

Mapillary lijkt geen doorgang te laten zien en op Actueel Hoogtebestand Nederland is evenmin sprake van kruising van het wildraster. (bandensporen houden op)

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=52.110354807583576&mapStyle=OpenStreetMap&lng=5.882299192026153&z=16.779496173169072&pKey=1336453143417566&focus=photo&x=0.4564733168567311&y=0.6983798258220469&zoom=0

http://mijndev.openstreetmap.nl/~allroads/NLOSMOK/OSMOKNL.html#map=19.22/52.1100/5.8837/0
pjvds (2022-10-13 13:13:31+00:00): Goede feedback Tilia_J! Ik heb de edit ongedaan gemaakt (staat in de queue). Die AHN is trouwens wel heel mooi, die kende ik nog niet en ga ik zeker gebruiken.
Pedja (2022-10-27 22:11:12+00:00): Are you sure this street name "Мaлорезавска" is correct?

You have two unresolved warnings in this Changeset.
francians (2022-10-13 17:10:15+00:00): Dear Juliana,

Thanks for the contribution, the Syntax is broken... Should be:

wikipedia=it:Ferrovia Genova-Ventimiglia

Would you mind to fix it?

Many thanks
Br
Francesco
eggie (2022-10-13 20:30:23+00:00): Dag BB   

Het Paleis van Justitie staat al op het gebouw zelf met amenity=courthouse
Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=127457793

Dis beter je toevoeging verwijderen.



Groet
eggie
eggie (2022-10-14 07:33:56+00:00): Alle info courthouse verplaatst naar adresnode
BroemBroem (2022-10-14 08:25:43+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Dank voor de hulp! Moet ik nog iets aanpassen? En is de tag building:levels goed getagd of staat die nu alleen op de outer line?

Mvg.
BroemBroem
eggie (2022-10-14 08:31:55+00:00): Hoi.. Volgens mij klopt het wel, maar ik ben er niet bekend.. dus up to you..  
Ik heb van die binnenplaats nog even een mp gemaakt en die twee bouwwerken als inner opgenomen anders zie je niet.
Mapse
eggie
4004 (2022-10-15 22:05:01+00:00): можа historic:name?
4004 (2022-10-15 22:12:08+00:00): перанес як олд нейм на Цесную
Seandebasti (2023-11-28 07:17:18+00:00): Hey, thanks for contributing place names in this area. It would be nice if you could fix them all to the right tag > place=village or =hamlet. You should not add a village with natural=hot_spring. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dvillage instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural=hot%20spring
eggie (2022-10-13 10:25:10+00:00): Beste conversify..

Een oprijlaan kan ook gewoon op de kaart bv als highway=service service=driveway  met een extra tag access=private

Verwijderen is het andere uiterste.
Kijk je nog even..

MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:24:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert