piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Zbarnett (2021-05-30 22:42:48+00:00): i'm exporting sections of rural road
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105437132
blackboxlogic (2021-05-31 00:25:30+00:00): If you plan to do a lot of this, please consider doing this type of data processing after exporting from osm instead of making many unhelpful edits to community data. It's not awful, just... odd. Thanks for explaining why.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105437132
xronos (2021-06-10 11:14:53+00:00): Какой именно объект так отмечен?
Milhouse (2021-05-27 18:09:19+00:00): Hi,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Thanks for adding this node. No need to write such a long explanation in the comment.
Just one suggestion as you are a new mapper, it would really help with the map rendering and searches if you could indicate the type of organisation you are adding. You can see a list here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features
It looks to me like office=lawyer looks appropriate here?
ratrun (2021-05-28 09:02:59+00:00): Kannst Du bitte den neuen Parkplatzweg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947825356 überprüfen? Dieser sieht komisch aus, weil er nicht mit dem existierenden Straßennetz verbunden ist und durch Häuser durchgeht.
Danke!
miscosm (2021-05-28 09:35:43+00:00): Danke, das muss ein Verschiebe-Unfall gewesen sein.
Luzandro (2021-06-04 04:59:04+00:00): Hallo,

das Einfahrtverbot beim Franz Joseph-Platz ergibt sich sowieso durch die Zugangsbeschränkungen am way. Hier noch zusätzlich 2 no_entry relations mit mehreren froms anzulegen ist mMn. nicht sinnvoll bzw. braucht man no_entry überhaupt nur als punktförmige Beschränkung bei "falschen Einbahnen", wo man am Weg dahinter prinzipiell fahren dürfte, aber nicht über diesen Punkt einfahren darf.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105437813
fabiotofy (2021-05-28 22:44:48+00:00): Hai trovato anche il nome della nuova strada fra Via Cividina ed il Piazzale Sipione ? Grazie
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105437852
Gabriele Dri (2021-05-29 12:28:49+00:00): Io non ho visto cartelli ancora, né ho . L'inaugurazione però sembra vicina dato che asfalto e segnaletica erano già pronti. Prossima settimana devo ripassare di lì, quindi ricontrollerò
Gabriele Dri (2021-05-29 12:29:24+00:00): *nè ho trovato notizie in rete
qqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqqq (2021-05-27 16:42:31+00:00): in the end it seems to have added a node 8773130688. nothing serious.
rthik007 (2021-05-28 04:39:50+00:00): Hi Otilia Ies,
Fixed the alignment, as building polygons overlapping with residential road way 609811951.
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105460106
Thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105438313
PelleV (2021-06-03 04:05:26+00:00): Why would you delete destination tags and then call it an adjustment?
Kovoschiz (2021-05-27 20:11:16+00:00): It's actually a mistake on `addr:housenumber=` used for flats/units.
Kovoschiz (2021-05-27 20:11:34+00:00): There is already a correct address here.
mueschel (2021-05-29 13:11:12+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!
I'm sorry to say that adding bus routes is not a good point to start contributing to OSM. Adding a bus route is a lot more complicated than drawing a new way and creating a relation. I suggest that you have a look to other cities with already mapped bus routes to learn how this is done. You can always ask for help on the various communication channels!
tekim (2021-05-28 15:27:51+00:00): Many of these trails that you have tagged surface=compacted are not.  They are informal climbers trails,  Nothing has been done to improve them, so they are surface=ground or dirt or unpaved
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105440342
StackKorora (2021-05-29 19:00:22+00:00): Thanks for the feedback.
tekim (2021-05-30 14:15:32+00:00): Thanks for being open to feedback, and thanks for all of your other great contributions to OSM. It is great seeing RMNP getting some mapping attention!

There are going to be very few, if any, trails in RMNP where surface=compacted.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-05-27 19:25:48+00:00): Wielkie dzięki za aktualizację!
eggie (2021-06-09 13:40:59+00:00): Government?  Why?

greetz
eggie
eggie (2021-05-27 17:53:01+00:00): Top!
Dimacn (2021-05-28 17:13:38+00:00): Можно узнать причину изменения названия сегмента дороги 01Н-5607 ? Вы убрали из названия "а/д".
tux67 (2021-05-28 09:14:01+00:00): Hallo JoPal,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.


Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.

Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105442548
tux67 (2021-05-28 09:14:21+00:00): Zu deinem Problem:
Wege lassen sich in den jeweiligen Editoren aufspalten (bei iD ist das ein Scherensymbol das bei einem rechtsklick auf einen Node erscheint)
Aaaber - besonders bei iD ist hier Vorsicht geboten, wenn mit dem Weg (Bus-) Relationen verbunden sind, weil die mit iD schon mal beschädigt werden. Ich hab' das hier mal getrennt und 30 eingetragen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105442548
tux67 (2021-05-28 09:17:53+00:00): Johannes-Huppertz-Straße Maxspeed 5? ist das eine Spielstraße? Dann sollte sie als solche gemappt werden.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105442705
JoPal (2021-05-29 05:44:11+00:00): Sorry, das habe ich noch nicht geblickt.
Und ja, eine Spielstraße
tux67 (2021-05-29 08:25:50+00:00): Maxspeed wird laut Wiki bei einer Spielstraße nicht gesetzt da es implizit ist.
Ich habe die Spielstraße eingetragen und maxspeed entfernt.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=living_street#Hinweise
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105442705
Arun Madhavan (2021-06-02 02:50:42+00:00): It would be useful if you give name of shops to identify them. Creating small residential areas is not really useful. Buildings makes sure the you shape them properly
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105442761
eggie (2021-05-27 18:44:22+00:00): Hi  evzhukov

Welcome to OSM

Please don't add addresses t building_shapes.  The addressnodes will do.

Greetz
Eggie
eggie (2021-05-27 18:46:21+00:00): Removed duplicated tagging address
gr eggie
mueschel (2021-05-29 09:50:27+00:00): Hi,
please check the tags you used here and on other bicycle repair stations.
'service:bicycle:XYZ' is used to describe which features for servicing a bicycle are available, like tools. 
They are not used for things like telephone chargers, toilets or TV.

Also, please note that all tags you use should be ones that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in the editor.
zolee0513 (2021-05-29 20:03:25+00:00): Hi,
I checked through all the bicycle repair stations i added and i corrected the service tags.

Thanks for your help!
zolee0513 (2021-06-07 09:56:27+00:00): Hi,
Should i have to make further modifications to make my bicycle repair stations appear on https://merretekerjek.hu website?
!bm (2021-05-30 23:25:23+00:00): Hallo BirkM,

zunächst willkommen zu OSM!

Bitte eigenständige Adressknoten nicht kapern! 

Korrigiert in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105587375

Happy mapping!

--besteGrüße!bm
eggie (2021-05-27 18:50:40+00:00): Hi.. 
Your intention is okay.. but... 
An addresnode is unique...  Please don't add addresses in OSM. 
They are already present.
Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2021-05-27 19:01:32+00:00): Dag degrauw.. Die Meeroever die door het gebouw liep heb ik even wat beter gelegd. 
De nieuwe wegen die waren ingetkend kun je ook veranderen in highway=proposed
proposed=living_street
name=...... 
Dan zie je ze niet op de kaart, maar staan toch in de database. 
Dan zijn het de ingeplande wegen. Nu zijn ze verwijderd?
MVG
eggie
danieldegroot2 (2021-05-27 18:27:46+00:00): Hey ACTtsocathe,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I see that you have over 1000 changesets and have been mapping buildings at your own pace. I also see you have requested review in the past and have not received any feedback, unfortunately.

Head over to https://learnosm.org/en/ to learn more on mapping. It will help you map correctly.

Also, could you please reply to this comment?
It would be greatly appreciated.
marek kleciak (2021-05-31 04:26:17+00:00): Dear Mapper, plz go in touch with danieldegroot2 . My comments, please stop to use description like
#hotosm-project-10857 #SAKSHAM #NepalYIL #DRRYLF2021 #DigitalaVolunteers #BIPAD

Better to use human like language: Remapping of ways for hotosm-project-10857 in team of Nepali DigitalaVolunteers. Note #SAKSHAM #NepalYIL #DRRYLF2021 #BIPAD
Galbinus (2021-06-05 11:44:20+00:00): Hallo Frank. Ich habe Deine Umstufung des südlichen Teils vom "Engeweg" und des südlichen Teils vom "Talweg" wieder geändert. Es handelt sich bei beiden Abschnitten um asphaltierte, einspurige Wege, die mit Verkehrzeichen 260 für KFZ gesperrt und lediglich für landwirtschaftlichen Verkehr freigegeben. Damit erfüllt diese Abschnitte nicht die Kriterien für highway=unclassified: Verbindungscharakter zwischen zwei Siedlungszielen. Der nördliche Abschnitt des Talwegs dagegen schon von Veldrom über Zollstockweg und Köhlerweg nach Kempen.
vgl. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dunclassified
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice
eggie (2021-05-27 18:52:41+00:00): The addressis already at the mainbuilding..  Please stop adding addresses.
eggie
eggie (2021-05-27 19:02:53+00:00): typo addresses
berndw (2021-05-29 07:54:42+00:00): Hallo fightingfarmer

Willkommen zurück bei OpenStreetMap

Trag bitte bei den Adressen auch die Postleitzahl und den Ort ein.

Ein Router sollte aus den umgebenden PLZ-Relationen und Flächen entnehmen, aber das klappt nicht immer

Weiterhin viel Spaß beim Mappen

Bernd
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-05-28 00:04:57+00:00): Hi, Bonjour!
Sur Notre-Dame, il y a bel et bien un trottoir des deux côtés. On Notre-Dame boulevard, there are sidewalks on both side. Also, please use sidewalk=no instead of sidewalk=none since in the Montreal area, we are using the no value for consistency. Thanks!

For sidewalk drawn separately, we use these tags: sidewalk=separate
sidewalk:left=separate (if there is a sidewalk on the left) or sidewalk:left=no if there is no sidewalk on the left, same thing for sidewalk:right=separate or no

also: crossing=traffic_signals is not very useful because we map traffic signals separately on both side of pedestrian crossing, so please use crossing=unmarked (if not a zebra) and crossing=marked/zebra only when there is a zebra or different pavement color (red, green, blue, etc.). Parallel lateral lines on both side of pedestrian crossing is considered unmarked because most car drivers just ignore them, so when we analyze pedestrian network, we do not want to consider them as special/marked. Thanks!
parimart (2021-05-28 16:00:57+00:00): Salut. Y-a-t-il une place où il est possible de voir comment on fait dans la région de montréal (un subreddit, un site web, une page facebook, un document)? Comme ca je ferai les choses comme il faut
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2021-05-28 16:18:39+00:00): On est justement en train de bâtir un tel wiki. Pour l'instant, il y a ces vidéos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQKnSvOHIe8fKEpiOCalRcDnP-f5wqNwo

Merci pour vos contribution, c'est très apprécié!

Je sais que dans le wiki d'Openstreetmap, on utilise marked/unmarked seulement quand il n'y a pas de feux de circulation, mais c'est surtout une vision européenne. ici, en Amérique du Nord, on devrait plutôt utiliser unmarked pour lignes parallèles latérales ou aucun marquage et marked pour zebra/clouté, qu'il y ait un feu ou non (ce n'est pas standardisé malheureusement). De façon générale, on ajoute des feux comme points sur la ligne de crossing avec traffic_signals:direction
Keima (2021-06-01 11:49:57+00:00): Bonjour,
Cette école existe a été rajouté juste avant vous: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947000557 Comme il a plus de détail et qu'il est surfacique je pense qu'il faut mieux garder l'autre.
Cordialement,
gpserror (2021-05-27 22:25:18+00:00): Thanks for adding your business.
I think the main issue is that you probably want to tag this as a "corporate office" so it shows up as a business.  Other issue is that any type of opinions, like what is written in the description, is out of the scope of a map, and should not be entered there - your URL that's there will link to your advertising.

Did you move from Midpoint Dr?
miche101 (2021-05-28 05:44:27+00:00): Hi,
verstehe deine Änderung nicht.. das hätte meines erachtens alles gepasst.. scheinbar ist ja die Straße noch nicht fertig.  Darum ist highway=construction richtig.. was es wird wird mit construction=* gespeichert. Einen Highway auf barrier zu ändern ist ganz falsch... dann müsste man auf einen Punkt des Highways die barrier eintragen. 

Gruß Miche

Mit diesem Änderungssatz änderst du highway=construction auf =primary
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=105446298



Hier änderst du Highway auf barrier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105447301#map=15/47.6984/12.8026&layers=N
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=105447301
SomeoneElse (2021-05-27 19:36:46+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/940533903 seems a very odd shape for a building.  What do you think it is?
Regards,
Andy
ACTraprild (2021-05-27 20:10:54+00:00): The building was long and rectangular, I did not get both sides when mapping the building.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-28 08:43:25+00:00): In the available imagery, I can see three small buildings in a row - certainly not a line.
ACTraprild (2021-05-28 13:06:13+00:00): I am looking at a screen of 8.5 in, in turn making the satellite pictures about 4 inches big. When scrolling in on the photos, it just makes pixels of color and, you can not tell where one building ends and the next begins.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-28 13:28:07+00:00): Try different imagery sources - Bing is quite detailed, but the trees have grown over the eastern end.  Esri Clarity appears to be older, but the trees are less prominent and you can see the building shapes better.
SomeoneElse (2021-05-28 13:28:56+00:00): Also, if there's a problem with not being able to see clearly enough on the screen that you are using, perhaps do some mapping elsewhere, where it's less critical?
blackboxlogic (2021-05-30 17:21:32+00:00): Hey, welcome to OSM. I just revered the changes you've made and they are all excellent contributions. Please ask if you have any questions and thank you for your work. -Alex
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/105446550
SomeoneElse (2021-06-06 10:35:38+00:00): Hello,
Andy from the OSM's Data Working Group here.
I'm currently trying to repair the road merge problems described at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/001302.html and noticed that the tags on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947881446 (v1 by you) seem implausible.  "lanes=4;5;1;2" has clearly been merged from several previous ways, as has the maxspeed.  Please check the historical data using overpass when you see tags like this.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2021-06-06 12:13:11+00:00): For completeness, as http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=614958795 shows, the previous version by Reitu had the same issue.  As per https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/001302.html I'll sort out that other users edits too (once I've finished these).
geo_roads (2021-06-07 23:16:13+00:00): Thank you Andy. I was trying to fix these merges but may have missed tags in cases like this. Please feel free to fully revert any of my changesets while working on reverting Reitu’s changesets.
SomeoneElse (2021-07-10 14:19:37+00:00): Hello,
Somethings gone wrong with the merge here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947881929/history had obviously wrong lanes values and obviously wrong maxspeed values.  There's also an overlap with another way on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/947881929 .  Also, there are other related maxspeed issues at https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/19ji - at least some of those seem to have been roads that you have edited.  In some cases you may be able to just delete your duplicate road; in others you may need to use overpass to "go back in time" to see what value was set previously.
Best Regards,
Andy
geo_roads (2021-07-12 22:27:32+00:00): Thanks for the comment. I did my best to restore geometry and tags to how they were before Reitu’s edits here.
H4N5-antw (2021-05-27 21:02:28+00:00): Mocht verduidelijken : het TEST centrum zal naar hier verhuizen, het VACCINATIE centrum blijft, én breidt uit op Spoor Oost, de toegevoegde node geeft echter link naar vaccovid = vaccinatie. 
https://antwerpen.testcovid.be/ lijkt juiste webstek voor hier? 
Beide sites geven "De Stad Antwerpen kan je helpen via de COVID-infolijn 03/435 95 55 (maandag – zondag: 9 uur – 17 uur)."
Openingsuren TESTcentrum slechts tot de verhuis op webstek, eigenlijk van geen belang gezien test op afspraak?
chris66 (2023-12-06 09:21:42+00:00): Habe links noch den Halt "RobertBoschStr" ergänzt,, da müssten noch die Relationen ergänzt werden.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3649690

Grüße
mueschel (2021-05-28 08:52:46+00:00): Hi,
these tags are not used in other places:
light_count
light_direction
light_shape

Could you check that? I guess you wanted to use ':' instead of '_'.
Anaximandre (2021-08-04 18:51:13+00:00): Thank you for your attention, it's fixed !
Carnildo (2021-05-27 22:49:22+00:00): Your aim seems to be a bit off: you renamed Silver Creek as "South 3rd Street".
Paul Spadaro (2021-05-27 20:30:04+00:00): #MRMAllies
Kogacarlo (2021-05-27 21:51:06+00:00): You removed the duplicate node I was about to remove. Thank you! ;-)
WoodWoseWulf (2021-05-27 21:25:54+00:00): Hi Pobert,

The park and footpath you added covered a house and its yard.

This is a public map that is used for many real word purposes. Please do not add fictional elements to it, they will be removed.
EneaSuper (2021-05-28 07:58:20+00:00): Ciao, ottimo lavoro, hai aggiunto una strada che io, per tutta una serie di motivi, non ho mai avuto modo di mappare 🙂

Ti sei solo dimenticato di denominare il tratto iniziale.
camminatoreseriale (2021-07-08 22:34:19+00:00): Ciao! Scusa il ritardo :-). Felicissimo di vedere un Genovese della zona appasionato di stradine strane. Siamo quasi tutti mezzi fantasmi :-) Se ti capita di organizzare qualcosa e ti va io ti seguo volentieri :-). Tra l'altro il perso si chiamava "Magna" non "Magra" come avevo scritto. Sono andato a verificare. Subito dopo i tavolini all'inizio (creati fra il 2010 e il 2011) non c'è più stata a manutenzione. E ho l'imperssione che gli abitanti delle posche case sottostanti non siano molto felici di aevre passaggio. Il sentiero è eccellente, ma ogni tanto ci sono oggetti palesemente buttati in messo al passaggio (porte, pali...) come "a scoraggiare il paesaggio". E poi in dalle case hanno i cani. Comunque varrebbe la pena superare le case e vedere se prosegue alla ferrovia (cosa che sospetto pesantemente) ;)
Felice di conoscrti, Lucas ;)
EneaSuper (2021-07-09 06:03:08+00:00): Piacere mio Lucas, io sono Enea!

Non ti preoccupare del ritardo, può succedere, dopotutto non è molto pratico comunicare tramite questo sistema.

Comunque ok, il lavoro come detto a me piace e sì, se ci sarà occassione di dover mappare qualcosa se riesco te lo farò sapere, grazie della disponibilità 🙂
quark21 (2021-12-10 12:53:31+00:00): Hallo
Es wurden verschieden Strassen (Tracks) mit Namen eingetragen. Diese sind vor Ort nicht ersichtlich (Z.B. Stassennamen-Schild). 
Sind dies überhaupt offizielle Namen (z.B. die mit Bindestrich sind als "Strasse von A nach B" zu verstehen). Was ist die Quelle? 
Merci
Newcomer2012 (2021-12-10 17:27:48+00:00): Die Strassennamen habe ich aus der Karte "Strassenklassierung Gde" des Geoportals entommen.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-05-27 21:32:33+00:00): Hi YesJayden

The park and footpath you added covered a house and its yard.

This is a public map that is used for many real word purposes. Please do not add fictional elements to it, they will be removed.
WoodWoseWulf (2021-05-27 21:23:35+00:00): Hi Big Goat Lord,

The park and footpath you added covered a house and its yard.

This is a public map that is used for many real word purposes. Please do not add fictional elements to it, they will be removed.
Владимир К (2022-11-12 17:25:18+00:00): Добрый день!
Что это за лыжня имени Серегина?
почему поверх других дорог, не присоединяя?
Shaun das Schaf (2021-05-28 05:47:19+00:00): Hallo TodtmoGraph,

einen Tag "internet_access=terminal=yes" gibt es so nicht. Füge den Wert "terminal" lieber zum "internet_access"-Tag hinzu, also:
"internet_access=wifi;terminal".

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Allison P (2021-05-27 22:56:51+00:00): Are the trails completely gone (as in you wouldn't even know there was a trail there)? If not, rather than deleting them, you can add access=no. Same goes for your other changeset.
oothomas (2021-05-28 13:38:42+00:00): Thanks for the input. The trails are currently still in place but will be obliterated in the near future. Will access=no hide these features from derivative maps (i.e. strava or alltrails)?
Allison P (2021-05-28 14:44:27+00:00): All major routers will either not show the features or mark them as inaccessible, and will certainly not route anyone down them.
oothomas (2021-05-28 15:37:47+00:00): Thank you, I will do this next time. Given that these trails are slated for removal I think deletion is appropriate. If you disagree, I can try and figure out how to revert the deletion.
Allison P (2021-05-28 17:55:54+00:00): I think it's okay to leave them as deleted if they're being removed in the next year or so. Reverting the deletions isn't too difficult though.
trial (2021-11-04 20:35:27+00:00): Si la soure ce https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8564020920 c'est knowledge, tu dois savoir l'associatedStreet qui va bien ;-)
Rom1 (2021-11-04 21:08:57+00:00): Pas compris ta remarque.
BraxtonWilddog (2021-09-03 12:41:54+00:00): https://www.nashuarpc.org/files/6315/3564/2444/merrimack_streets_poster.pdf
maybe?
aweech (2021-09-03 18:25:44+00:00): Hi,
I'm not sure what you mean by linking this. It doesn't show the new street to the southwest of Tinker.
wonderb0lt (2021-05-27 21:07:43+00:00): One minor correction already made - changeset ID 105449862 :)
ElliottPlack (2021-05-29 06:16:10+00:00): You need to write longer changeset comments. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

What exactly was realigned and removed?
Adrien Nayrat (2021-05-27 21:19:26+00:00): J'ai un doute sur le tag du feu 8773861818, c'est un feu juste pour les cyclistes à contre sens des voitures.
ElliottPlack (2021-05-29 06:16:07+00:00): You need to write longer changeset comments. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

What exactly was realigned and removed?
ElliottPlack (2021-05-29 06:16:04+00:00): You need to write longer changeset comments. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

What exactly was realigned and removed?
ElliottPlack (2021-05-29 06:16:01+00:00): You need to write longer changeset comments. Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

What exactly was realigned and removed?