piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2018-12-04 23:30:23+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
maraf24 (2019-01-19 20:37:01+00:00): Poznikały tagi building z wielu bydynków wskutek tych edycji.
rayleigh1 (2019-05-29 21:21:09+00:00): Tak niestety zadziałała edycja w OSMAnd. Od tego czasu edytuję w ID i jest dobrze
maraf24 (2019-05-29 21:35:51+00:00): A to coś nowego, sprawdzę:)
Na iD też radzę uważać, np. usuwa tag budynku przy dodawaniu śmietnika.
Una tantum (2025-09-23 18:44:41+00:00): Ciao Parma1983, rispetto al Palazzo Miari che tu situi affianco alla prefettura (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/652421079) sai se per caso ce ne sono due con lo stesso nome a poca distanza? La Regione posiziona un Palazzo Miari poco distante al n. civico 51 (vedi https://www.tourer.it/mappa?id=9961 e https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q106077483), ma su wikidata un altro palazzo non meglio collocabile è chiamato palazzo del Conte Miari, già Buralli e poi Cusani https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q55177814
Parma1983 (2025-09-23 20:10:31+00:00): Ciao.
Di quella modifica onestamente non mi ricordo quasi nulla, essendo passati tanti anni. Ho un vago ricordo di aver letto la storia dell'adiacente ex Albergo della Posta e che si parlasse lì anche di quel palazzo. Ora però non riesco a trovare nulla.
Di certo il palazzo Miari (già dei Buralli nel XVI secolo e dei Cusani tra il XVII e il XIX secolo) è quello al numero 51, come era stato riportato nel 2020 sulla Gazzetta di Parma in quella serie di articoli sui palazzi di Parma che erano stati pubblicati a cadenza settimanale); avevo scaricato quegli articoli e ho appena verificato che si tratta esattamente di quello (la foto sul Catalogo dei beni culturali non è corretta, perché, mentre l'indirizzo è giusto e anche l'architetto è corretto, l'immagine riguarda l'edificio dopo la Prefettura).
Una tantum (2025-09-24 06:49:58+00:00): Tutto sistemato, grazie per la risposta.
sheldonelectric (2020-07-09 16:27:25+00:00): Did you check street signs before doing this? int_name=Siru ?
vorpalblade-kaart (2020-07-13 21:54:18+00:00): No. This was a case of taking a `name:en` which was a transliteration and moving it to `int_name`, since it was not actually an English translation. I assumed that the user that added the original `name:en` had backing information. This was fairly soon after I started working at Kaart, but I made assumptions based how I had been editing prior to being hired by Kaart. In short, I assumed that information that someone else had added to an object was generally correct, although it might be entered in an incorrect fashion (e.g., `opening_hours=Monday-Friday 8AM to 8PM` or `surface_type=asphalt`).

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30485569 for the changeset that actually added `name:en=Siru`.

IIRC, you reached out about a similar issue about adding `name:el` tags when `name:en` tags existed. It looks like I may have added a check for transliterated names in `name:en` around the time I was editing this way (edit on 12/3 to add `name:el` since there was a `name:en`, edit on 12/4 to move `name:en` to `int_name`, which would have removed the need for `name:el`).

Hopefully this wall of text answered your question (no, I did not look at images for the int_name) and explain why I made the change. :)
mappas (2020-07-14 05:10:10+00:00): Sorry about the addition of 'name:en', that was the old me, who didn't know lots about naming, and wanted the names to show up in "english" on my navigation app or something like this :^)
They can all be removed.
Phyks (2018-12-05 10:44:11+00:00): Bonjour,

Je réagis suite à la demande de relecture des changements. Je ne comprends pas très bien le message du lot de modifications "Ajout nombre de niveau" alors que l'ajout semble être un nouveau bâtiment (cabanon).

Le tracé du cabanon semble correct. En revanche, je ne comprends pas pourquoi https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41666590 a été modifié. En particulier, il décrit un type d'usage du terrain (landuse=farmland initialement, pour indiquer que ce sont des terres cultivées).

Après la modification, il y a un tag "building=yes" à la place, qui veut dire que cette surface entière est un bâtiment.

Je l'ai corrigé dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65196104.

Bonne journée,
dlalleme (2018-12-05 11:05:58+00:00): Bonjour,
Cette modification est une erreur; problème d'habitude à l'utilisation de l'éditeur.
Désolé. J'ai juste voulu rajouter le cabanon qui est sur le cadastre et indiquer qu'il faisait partie de la maison à côté.
Cordialement
Phyks (2018-12-05 12:44:38+00:00): Pas de problèmes :)
muralito (2025-08-20 19:46:31+00:00): Hola. El tunel que le pusiste toll=yes en este cambio del 2018, anduve por ahi pospandemia y no recuerdo peaje. ¿Podrás revisarlo?
guillemmal (2025-08-20 20:41:40+00:00): Hola! El tunel tuvo peaje unos años, era electrónico y tenias que ir a una web para abonarlo. Actualmente esta desactivado, hay que actualizarlo! Saludos!
muralito (2025-08-20 20:49:15+00:00): Listo! Gracias!
naoliv (2018-12-04 20:45:04+00:00): João, o que você quis fazer nessa sua edição, por favor?
Você acabou deixando errada a representação do estado de MG.
viloan (2018-12-04 18:21:52+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
jlinfante_import (2018-12-04 18:50:02+00:00): Hola de nuevo,
por favor, no utilices abreviaturas en los nombres. 
Puedes ver los motivos en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Abreviaciones_.28NO_HACER_ESTO.29
Respecto a los nombres, sigue lo que se explica en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Catalan/Criteris_ling%C3%BC%C3%ADstics
Un saludo!
Phyks (2018-12-05 10:47:09+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM !

Je réagis suite à la demande de relecture. Je ne comprends pas le message "Ajout nombre de niveau", étant donné que la modification effectuée est l'ajout d'un nouveau magasin.

Concernant le nouveau magasin, voici quelques remarques :
* Le nom est probablement "Ciboulette & Cie" (i minuscule) mais je ne connais pas le magasin.
* Est-ce un supermarché (shop=supermarket) ou plutôt une épicerie / petit commerce de proximité (plutôt shop=convenience) ?
* Un meilleur moyen de préciser qu'il ne vend (que ?) des produits bios est d'utiliser "organic=yes" ("organic=only" ?). Voir notamment https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:organic.

Bonne journée !
Phyks (2018-12-05 10:47:39+00:00): Si une de mes remarques n'est pas claire ou si vous avez un doute, n'hésitez pas à me demander :)
dlalleme (2018-12-05 10:59:36+00:00): Bonjour,
J'ai modifié le nom du magasin  et rectifié son type.
Par contre, je n'ai pas trouvé comment indiquer qu'ils vendaient des produits bio.
Phyks (2018-12-05 12:43:58+00:00): Bonjour,

Vous pouvez ajouter n'importe quel attribut dans la section "Tous les attributs" en bas de la colonne d'édition à gauche. Les champs en haut de cette colonne sont uniquement des aides pour les attributs les plus courants.

Une capture d'écran : https://lutim.phyks.me/Xht14xQi/kKUfGmvN.png.
muralito (2018-12-04 20:10:39+00:00): Are you sure these are toll both and not just a border control?
LemonEarlMapper (2018-12-04 21:26:56+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out. I will make that fix.
rskedgell (2018-12-05 00:15:09+00:00): Thanks. I wonder what rationale was used unilaterally to decide that fhrs:local_authority_id=* is an ephemeral value and could be removed in a large-scale automated edit? Perhaps one for DWG?
Polarbear (2019-01-23 14:42:06+00:00): Thanks @will_p2 for the reverts. 
Are they complete? When I add the 4 mech edits, I get a total of 7152w, 37r, 9535n; while the two reverts have 4508w, 21r, 6626n.
Of course a reason could be that the mech edit touched objects twice or more.
will_p (2019-01-23 17:12:31+00:00): To the best of my knowledge the revert is complete. Many objects were touched twice. For example, fhrs:rating and fhrs:inspectiondate appear to have been removed in separate changesets.
Polarbear (2019-01-23 20:00:49+00:00): Thanks again. Which was another indicator for a badly planned mech edit.
eggie (2018-12-04 19:55:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-12-04 19:58:11+00:00): De benzinepomp staat nu 2x in de database. Wellicht dan eentje weghalen van de toevoerweg.
MVG, Eggie.
chnav (2019-01-20 10:29:44+00:00): Will be reverted due to mapping for renderer.
mueschel (2018-12-16 15:46:15+00:00): Hi,
you're inventing a huge number of new tags here. Please spend some time to see if there is an already established tag for this information. 
Please also note that OSM is not a place for private information like names of inhabitants, or their belongings. 

bed_nets
inhabited
no_cuartos
no_dehabitantes
no_families
no_rociables
no_sleeping_spaces
jefedefamilia
jessbeutler (2019-01-16 18:31:43+00:00): Hi Mueschel, 
Thank you for catching this - these tags and data were not intended to be uploaded and will be removed immediately. 
Best, 
Jess
eggie (2018-12-04 20:03:00+00:00): Dag mapstack. je verandert hier de vorm van de gebouwen zoals ze zijn geimporteerd vanuit het Kadaster. Het kan zijn dat er iets niet klopt, maar dan kun je een terugmelding doen bij het Kadaster. 
Het heeft dus geen zin om gebouwen te veranderen, want er komt geregeld nieuwe import. 
Zijn deze gebouwen veranderd?
Wat je wel nog kunt verbeteren is het ontbreken van de landuse=residential van dit deel van de wijk. Verder is het extreem moeilijk mappen in Den haag voor starters, want een mapper heeft ondanks alle verzoeken om het niet te doen alle landuse geplakt aan de wegen in bijna heel de stad.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-04 20:05:12+00:00): Zo staat het in de BAG .. waneer het niet klopt even een terugmelding doen via deze site. https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=goudreinetstraat%20217&resultOffset=0&objectId=0518100000332259&geometry.x=77404.196400512&geometry.y=453580.7675982&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0518100000332259
eggie (2018-12-04 19:41:31+00:00): Nooit met access=no beginnen. het is een totaalverbod. Je kunt wel aangeven wie er langs mag. Bv horse=yes  foot en bicycle zijn default en hoef je niet speciaal te taggen. Kwaad kan het niet overigens. 
Motor_vehicle is "no" per default. Het zal nooit routeren voor auto's langs een bollard behalve als je dat aangeeft. ik had het goed getagd. 
Er wordt overigens verschillend gedacht over "overbodige" tags. 
access=no zal ik er in ieder geval afhalen. Er zijn veel meer weggebruikers dan je op het eerste gezicht zou denken.
eggie (2018-12-04 19:44:48+00:00): Het is een NL:G11 fietspad.  (verplicht fietspad) De router houdt nu snorfiets tegen, want die heb je niet getagd als yes. Dus in ieder geval mofa=yes toevoegen
eggie (2018-12-04 19:48:30+00:00): Overigens prima dat je de bollards toevoegt. De lokale mapper hier is D.vdHoven. Hij is de routespecialist voor fietspaden. Bij ingrijpende veranderingen zou ik hem even raadplegen van te voren. 
Groet en mapse,
Eggie
muralito (2018-12-04 20:01:56+00:00): Why did you add toll booths?
LemonEarlMapper (2018-12-04 21:25:12+00:00): Sorry, I didn’t notice the border was nearby. I will change the tags to reflect the border control station.
LemonEarlMapper (2018-12-04 21:28:23+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out. I will make that fix.
muralito (2018-12-04 23:29:35+00:00): Same as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65171981 (border control unified)
LemonEarlMapper (2018-12-04 23:52:25+00:00): Thanks for the information.
muralito (2018-12-04 20:01:24+00:00): Why did you add toll booths?
LemonEarlMapper (2018-12-04 21:37:18+00:00): Sorry, I didn’t notice the border was nearby. I will change the tags to reflect the border control station.
muralito (2018-12-04 23:28:25+00:00): The border control was unified by both countries more than 30 years ago. Control is done the other margin of the river.

There is no control here, maybe the buildings are in use, but not for toll nor border control.
LemonEarlMapper (2018-12-04 23:41:45+00:00): Thanks
OSchlüter (2018-12-05 05:24:31+00:00): Moin
Bitte highway=living_street nicht mit einen
maxspeed versehen
siehe 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street
abrensch (2018-12-09 17:49:59+00:00): ... und auch bzgl. diesem Changeset hier bitte nochmal diesen Note anschauen:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1673498066

9 (!) TRs an einem Note und mindestens eine davon ist boese

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
viloan (2018-12-04 20:05:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Akkurator (2018-12-22 18:26:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/603448509
Du hast hier acces=no und foot=yes ergänzt.
Was wolltest du damit ausdrücken?

Es bedeutet: Durchgang generell verboten, Ausnahme für Fußgänger.
Akkurator (2018-12-22 18:27:57+00:00): So weit ich mich erinnern kann, ist das eine normale Treppe, die jeder benutzen darf. Somit sind acces-Tags nicht nötig.
R0bst3r (2018-12-05 08:55:04+00:00): Hallo Rhabarbara17,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, sie sehen gut aus.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65173959
fiscal (2021-02-22 15:38:09+00:00): Please avoid snapping buildings into streets: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65173984
literan (2018-12-05 20:29:40+00:00): vandal edit https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65174084/ - reverted
Phyks (2018-12-05 10:49:14+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM,

Je réagis à la demande de relecture des modifications. La rue modifiée a été notée comme étant en sens unique vers le Nord (sens Rue du Peintre Heim vers Rue Denfert-Rochereau).

Je ne connais pas le terrain, si c'est bien le cas, alors la modification est correcte :)

Bonne journée,
uvi (2022-11-22 17:31:07+00:00): Hallo Herdenvater, in diesem Änderungssatz hast du den Namen "Wachhübel" zu diesem Berg https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6116970528 erfasst. Im Moment wird hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3231018 diskutiert, ob dies so korrekt ist. Vielleicht kannst du ja dort einmal die Datenherkunft erläutern.
VG Uwe
rab (2018-12-04 21:18:38+00:00): please do not map this non relevant paths
Sjord (2019-07-28 18:18:49+00:00): Is this a drinking fountain? Should this be tagged as amenity=drinking_water?
Martin Borsje (2019-07-28 18:21:28+00:00): most likely drinkable safely but not supervised :)
viloan (2018-12-04 21:37:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Phoenix830 (2018-12-04 21:41:57+00:00): *Note Large change set due to isp issues while collecting info. I should be back to small uploads after this.

Removed incorrect turning circles (2)
Added Numbers and other addr tags for existing geometry
Spit existing geometry to represent the properties being semi-detached and added addr tags
Added name to playground
Created multiple geometry with addr tags inarticulate house names that do not have numbers
added nodes with addr tags where I can not accurately mark geometry 

This information was gathered by multiple walks around this area
Geometry shapes created from Bin imagery aided by information collected


To do:

Add properties at end of Camp Road and adjust footpath/road relation.
Add other building in the area.

Add building=semidetached_house tag? (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dsemi).

Make any adjustments recommended in change set comments.

Possibly work out geometry where only nodes were added.
Stop using the word geometry if it is the incorrect term.
Stop using the word geometry 7 times (now 8) is more than enough :)
rainerU (2018-12-07 08:33:11+00:00): Bonjour,

tu as changé le nom d'u chemin https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/41431355 à "Gran Bosc". Peux-tu donner la source de cette information? N'est-ce pas plutôt le nom d'un lieu-dit ou d'une partie de ce chemin?

RainerU
Florimondable (2018-12-14 23:11:47+00:00): Bonjour, comme déjà dit (en commentaire de commit au moins) la passerelle n'est pas une rue piétonne (vue que c'est un pont), donc on ne pas mettre highway=pedestrian, mais plutôt footway.
GeorgeKaplan (2018-12-15 07:28:57+00:00): Bonjour,
Avec la clé highway, on taggue la législation, les restrictions physiques se font avec les clés bridge, width, maxheight, surface, smoothness, etc. 
Tout comme un trottoir et une zone piétonne n'ont pas les mêmes autorisations et conditions de circulations pour les différentes catégories d'usagers, 
highway=pedestrian et highway=footway n'autorisent pas le même routage, ils ne sont pas interchangeables.

Côté Paris, un panneau B54 définit la passerelle comme zone piétonne. Dans OSM, la zone piétonne se taggue par highway=pedestrian.
Highway=footway est à utliser pour les trottoirs, exclusivement réservés aux piétons.

Concernant le fait que côté Ouest, la circulation des cycles n'y est pas autorisée, la solution du suffixe forward/backward me semble la bonne solution.
Florimondable (2018-12-18 16:45:04+00:00): Non, on ne taggue pas la législation avec highway, on tag l'importance physique de la route cf le wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:highway
Bien que des règles de droit vont avec le tag highway par défaut, ce sont plus les tag access, maxspeed qui disent la règle.

Non, footway n'est pas un trottoir, c'est un path, un chemin réservé aux piétons.

Tu peux ajouter un tag panneau zone piétonne au niveau d'un nœud si tu le souhaites.

Je remarque que toutes les passerelles de Paris, et certaines bien plus larges sont en footway pas en pedestrian.

Pour moi pedestrian est une rue.
Truchin (2019-02-14 09:07:06+00:00): Oui je plussoie.
On ne tague en pedestrian que les voies qui sont accessibles aux véhicules pour atteindre leur destination (par exemple d'urgence). En l’occurrence, ce n'est pas le cas de cette passerelle pour laquelle footway ou path serait plus adapté.
user_6110846 (2018-12-04 22:07:45+00:00): додаток до коменту

плюс створення лісу
woodpeck (2018-12-12 08:17:54+00:00): Jeff, have you contacted the mapper who created the circular buildings you reverted here, and explained the problem?
wupiccsss (2018-12-12 17:10:03+00:00): woodpeck, as you are writing here with your private and not your DWG account: Why is this your department?

If company mappers would get some mandatory education this will benefit all of us. Do you have any contact to Accenture?
Jeff Underwood (2018-12-12 17:58:58+00:00): I've sent them a message explaining the issue and the associated HOT task was invalidated with an explanation so if they do further crisis mapping they will also get a message on the tasking manager.
woodpeck (2018-12-12 19:45:42+00:00): The DWG has received a complaint about a different changeset comment that was disparaging to the original mapper (and that was written by a third party unrelated to either Accenture or Facebook as far as we know). I was just trying to understand the sequence of events. -- Jeff, do you have a link to the HOT task that was invalidated? -- wupiccsss, apparently you have registered a fresh account just to make this comment, may I ask why? Are you connected to any of the involved parties?
Jeff Underwood (2018-12-12 19:57:56+00:00): Yeah its here https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/5170?task=2977#bottom
ma-rt-in (2018-12-07 09:24:12+00:00): Hallo,
warum hast du in dem Park die Flächen, welche bereits als Wald bezeichnet ist, mit Bäume zugepflastert?
vg
Borbus (2019-02-11 22:07:38+00:00): Assuming these new parallel rails are correct, should they be tagged railway=preserved? At the moment they look like mainlines.
Carto'Cité (2021-02-08 09:14:09+00:00): Bonjour offshore44,
Je me permets de te contacter car tu avais ajouté cycleway=lane sur cet objet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/49804058 qui avait déjà cycleway:right=lane qui est plus juste au final :)
Je me permets de te le dire si des fois tu refaisais cette manipulation.
Je corrige ; n'hésite pas à me contacter si tu as une remarque ou une question.
Charles de Carto’Cité
henriko (2023-04-07 11:12:17+00:00): The water tower does not look like a donut.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-02 15:48:01+00:00): Hello!

You used
leisure=nature reserve
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/624802667/history

Have you maybe meant
leisure=nature_reserve
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?