piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2021-10-13 07:04:20+00:00): Hi, Regarding the tag maxspeed=30 mph on Node: 9164585042. If there is a max speed on the road the tag should go on the highway, not an individual node. As it is the max speed is not a restriction to the highway speed.

Regards Bernard.
Wookey (2021-10-13 08:26:27+00:00): Yes thanks for the reminder. I do know that, but the limitations of using vespucci whilst cycling make it hard to avoid such 'approximations'. I'm going over all the stuff I uploaded 'live' this week over the next few days to fix all that sort of stuff.
Wookey (2021-10-14 20:59:38+00:00): OK. fixed. I've also found that vespucci tends to snap to nearby nodes, even though that's not what is shown on the screen, so far too many of my benches and signs are mapped in the middle of the cycle route or attached to other nearby ways. I'm working through fixing about 100 of them.
AndersAndersson (2021-10-11 20:45:57+00:00): Finns inte taxiway C kvar?
AndersAndersson (2021-10-19 12:35:34+00:00): Any comments on taxiway C?
GinaroZ (2021-10-11 13:15:32+00:00): Is the ATM still there?
kapazao (2021-10-11 16:22:54+00:00): Hola, en el caso de que los contenedores se hayan movido de sitio es mejor que lo hagas así antes que eliminar y crear de nuevo, ya que se pierde histórico.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112369333
Pipeton (2021-10-11 16:46:16+00:00): Hola. Lo hubiese hecho así, pero no sé a dónde los han movido, y si los cambiase de sitio no sería un reflejo de la realidad.
kapazao (2021-10-13 17:29:13+00:00): Lo decía porque hay 4 contenedores que eliminaste y luego volviste a crear justo en la acera de enfrente, cosa que simplemente moviendo y corrigiendo alguna cosa evitas eliminar.
Un saludo
Frans S (2021-10-11 14:12:41+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings, mapped and corrected.
For me there is no need to ask for a review on your uploads, exept when you feel it is necessary.
(I reviewed 10 changeset from you. All well mapped.) 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112369681
nmombo12 (2021-10-12 11:46:07+00:00): Hello! In iD editor, you can use the keyboard shortcut "q" to square the corners of a building or any closed way.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112369934
sgudiva (2021-10-13 10:56:33+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs. I really appreciate the feedback shared regarding mapping buildings .I've made the necessary changes in the changeset #112454794 .
Going ahead, I'll ensure to square the buildings while mapping them.
Thanks again, Happy mapping!

Regards,
sgudiva.
nmombo12 (2021-10-11 11:52:12+00:00): Hello,

Was this address verified on the ground? From what I can see from their website, the address is 

1751 S. Telegraph Rd
Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302

If this is correct, does one of the nearby streets need to be corrected to "Enterprise Court"?

-Noah
ZeLonewolf (2021-10-15 02:21:41+00:00): Hello,
It appears that you are editing on behalf of a company.  If so, that's perfectly fine, but we require that you comply with OpenStreetMap's organized editing guide:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

Please confirm that you understand this request.  Thanks!
marczoutendijk (2021-10-15 19:05:03+00:00): See:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5384
 
Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
archpdx (2021-11-16 01:27:45+00:00): Based on their website this looks like the address of their corporate headquarters:
https://corp.summitsports.com/contact-us-3/
I've changed the address to the one shown on the Bloomfield Hills page
jmsbert (2021-10-11 22:12:54+00:00): Hi rigilk3nt,
just recognized your changeset / note. It seems that the more southern segment connected to the roundabout [1] needs also to be tagged differently: e.g. "oneway=-1" instead of "oneway=yes". 
[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991920410#map=19/28.68681/-17.77053&layers=N
jmsbert (2021-10-22 20:20:45+00:00): As there was no reaction so far, I have fixed the oneway-restriction of the segment [1] -> now it will be possible to reach the roundabout by car coming from western direction.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112855281
eggie (2021-10-11 11:41:33+00:00): Dag Jannie... Je wandelpad loopt aan de noordzijde door het water. Hoe kom je daar doorheen? Met natte voeten?

MVG
eggie
Supaplex (2021-11-01 14:16:27+00:00): OpenStreetMap 计划是全球性的，依据 de facto 状况，南海为争议区域，name栏位请用实际控制的国家的命名，其他语言则加到对应的语言栏位，所以请别只有加中文名称，移除其他语言以及Wikidata连结
user_12389142 (2021-11-03 06:59:40+00:00): 明白，确系修改失误。南中国海虽然有多个声称拥有其主权，但是南中国海由中华人民共和国实际控制，晚些时候增补语言。
Supaplex (2021-11-06 03:18:45+00:00): 这边是争议地区，非单一国家控制的，请慎重依据事实做出编辑，依据实际岛屿控制的国家的语言来填写名称
trigpoint (2021-10-11 11:54:09+00:00): Hi
A turn restriction here isn't quite correct as at this point Garstang Road is divided. It would be preferable to split Garstang Road at this point and allow the resulting oneway to take care of routing.

Cheers Phil
trigpoint (2021-10-11 11:55:39+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=278744020613521
DzmitryBachkarou (2021-10-12 09:11:28+00:00): Hi, Cheers Phil. Did not make a Dual carriageway in this place, because there is a lot of bus relations and there is no data to make them right.
eggie (2021-10-11 12:54:25+00:00): Tip Nu ga je nog steeds door het water.
In dat geval er geen brug is  dan ford=yes taggen of ford=stepping_stones op een node en op het gedeelte door het water. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ford%3Dyes
eggie
JannieA (2021-10-11 14:23:21+00:00): Dank voor de feedback. Ik heb geprobeerd de twee uiteinden aan elkaar te maken, zonder succes. Het is gewoon een doorlopend stukje land...
eggie (2021-10-11 14:27:39+00:00): Ahh.. zo... Dat aan elkaar maken dat kan niet zomaar. Die stukken zijn onderdeel van dezelfde multipolygoon. Die komt dan zichzelf tegen.
Ik kijk zo wel even naar de oplossing.
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-11 14:50:54+00:00): Done...  Het kleine water is nu een inner de landuse =grass
gr eggie
JannieA (2021-10-11 14:56:02+00:00): Dank! Kan dit ook in de online editor? Ik ben een te sporadische mapper dat ik andere programma's ga leren...
eggie (2021-10-11 15:03:44+00:00): Het kan wel, .... . 

https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/id-editor/

en hier dus
https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/id-editor/#multipolygonen-tekenen

Ben zelf editor iD niet gewend. 

Succes,
eggie
SomeoneElse (2021-10-11 11:38:50+00:00): Bugger.  Forgot to close changeset.  The "other" edit in here is filling in a gap in London_LOOP_11 (relation 3685850).  There's nothing in the middle, honest!
ZeLonewolf (2022-12-06 23:58:45+00:00): Hello,

I noticed you mapped "Randall Park" as encompassing all of the two cemeteries as well as print works pond.  That doesn't seem correct?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
aceman444 (2024-05-18 17:22:01+00:00): Hi, if you add private swimming pools, either do not add them at all, or tag them access=private so that they do not appear being publicly accessible. Thanks.
aceman444 (2024-05-18 17:23:02+00:00): Also please put proper changeset description instead of just unhelpful "Diklo". See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments .
eggie (2021-10-11 12:04:03+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-11 12:07:07+00:00): Je tweede rugbyveld loopt dwars door een gebouw heen. Dat zal niet kloppen.
Je gebruikt een verouderde achtergrondfoto. BING ligt verschoven en is zgn. outdated. Beter de PDOK actueel instellen.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-11 12:11:34+00:00): Gebouw De Beukekamp zie ik ook niet meer op de luchtfoto.
Marco_KPN (2021-10-11 12:19:36+00:00): het tweede veld was het oude veld. is nu niet in gebruik. had moeite met verwijderen. daarom alleen naam verwijderd. het gebouw "de beuken kamp" is al weer 5 jaar geleden gesloopt hiervoor is de nieuwe sporthal "de beuk" voor terug gekomen
eggie (2021-10-11 12:24:07+00:00): Oke.. duidelijk.
Wanneer je het veld en daarna het gesloopte gebouw selecteert en je drukt op de rechtermuistoets krijg je een menu.
Daar zal vast wel iets staan als 'verwijderen'
Anders druk je op de delete knop...
Ik gebruik zelf editor josm.
Succes
Eggie
eggie (2021-10-11 12:26:16+00:00): Wellicht heb je hier iets aan
https://learnosm.org/nl_NL/beginner/
eggie (2021-10-11 12:27:35+00:00): Het oude clubhuis van de Rugby staat er ook niet meer. Up to you  :)
eggie (2021-10-11 12:32:59+00:00): Hier even als voorbeeld hoe je nieuwbouw versneld kunt laten importeren vanuit de BAG via het forum van OSM.... 
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=843514#p843514
FrankOverman (2021-10-11 20:31:37+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=843564#p843564
eggie (2021-10-11 20:39:13+00:00): Frank Bedankt

Ik zal even kijken...
Gr eggie
eggie (2021-10-11 20:47:44+00:00): Done... 
Ter zake doende info verplaatst naar adresnode en gebouwkenmerken naar BAG gebouwen. 
De import verbonden met een zelf ingetekend tussenstuk. In de BGT staat het althans zo en op de luchtfot lijkt het één gebouw. 
Up to the local mapper. 
Gr eggie
FrankOverman (2021-10-11 20:51:59+00:00): Heel goed, en snel weer
Mvg!
Futur3r (2021-10-11 13:28:22+00:00): Bonjour,

j'ai corriger avec landuse=farmyard et place=farm.

Ces tags sont plus adapter.

Merci pour ta contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112371755
egilli (2021-10-11 14:19:51+00:00): Bonjour,
Merci @Future3r ! Mais c’est bizarre, j’ai vu sur la page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:landuse%3Dfarmyard que landuse=farmyard est utilisée pour le corps de ferme, or ici il n’y a pas de bâtiment : ce sont uniquement des cultures (dont certaines sous serres), voire quelques petits cabanons ici et là. landuse=farmland n’est-il pas plus adapté dans ce cas-là ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112371755
Futur3r (2021-10-12 11:12:10+00:00): Peut être, j'ai utilisé cette valeur pour l'autre ferme urbaine d'Annecy (Ceux qui Sèment, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/973338428#map=19/45.90836/6.14136).

Vu que l'exploitation est tellement comprimée, les deux se mêlent.

Mais j'avoue que dans ce cas là, farmland est sûrement plus précis.

Je ne pense pas que le schéma de tag à été pensé pour les fermes urbaines, du coup, il en revient au contributeur de faire la part des choses ...
egilli (2021-10-14 09:19:20+00:00): Ok, merci @Futur3r pour ces réflexions :)
MxxCon (2021-10-12 01:14:56+00:00): Hello.
You removed building tag here. Was this a mistake?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112371777
Commodoortje (2021-10-31 21:02:50+00:00): Ik heb de tag:
barrier=bollard
toegevoegd.
eggie (2021-10-11 12:40:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback..  Juist fietspaden een naam geven komt de navigatie ten goede... Vooral bij het vinden van adressen. De hoofdrijbaan staat immers op slot voor fietsverkeer.
Dus beter weer de naam toevoegen.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-11 13:28:59+00:00): De naam Roermondseweg toegevoegd aan het fietspad en aan de aansluitingen van de rotonde. Daar stond het nog verkeerd.
MVG
eggie
archpdx (2021-10-11 17:14:20+00:00): Hi,
Please don't abbreviate street names in addresses, in this area this includes cardinal direction prefixes. See:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29
Lee Carré (2021-10-11 12:29:32+00:00): What makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
amnmalik (2022-05-16 04:35:20+00:00): Hi Creedaz,
We were recently on the Patlasu circuit track and didn't find a route from the peak with elevation 4210 m on OSM to the marked Patalsu peak 4230. Do you know or remember how doable or difficult was this?
eggie (2021-10-11 12:47:15+00:00): Oke..  Top!

Voor het nieuwe sportgebouw heb ik import aangevraagd .. zie voorgaande changeset.
Gebouwen en adresnodes zijn eigenlijk in principe het enige dat ge:importeerd wordt. We tekenen niet zelf gebouwen. Slopen uiteraard wel.
Gr eggie
user_2066394 (2021-10-25 08:47:33+00:00): Die beiden Gebäude sind verbunden oder ist da eine Lücke dazwischen?
Pokeshot (2021-10-25 14:08:01+00:00): In der Tat; sie sind auf beiden Ebenen (EG und OG) durch einen Durchgang verbunden.
Tomas Straupis (2021-11-05 06:55:14+00:00): Laba diena. Ar tikrai šitoj kolonėlėj yra specializuota dulkių siurblių parduotuvė? :-)
Talkless (2021-11-05 10:37:52+00:00): Ech, turėjo būt amenity=... 

Ačiū, pataisiau visur. matyt kartą suklydau, po to JOSM autocompletino...
Tomas Straupis (2021-11-05 16:31:35+00:00): Jojo, taip jau būna. Man irgi būna arba kažkas atsiunčia, arba pats randu, kai pastatas pažymėtas kokiu nors service=driveway dėl to, kad anksčiau kažką taip žymėjau :-) Na svarbu išsiaiškinom. Man tiesiog places.openmap.lt filtras rodo, kad atsirado naujos „parduotuvės“ :-D Sėkmės!
salvoconducto (2021-10-11 13:54:18+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments
Lex legis (2021-10-11 17:18:57+00:00): Ok, I will try to be more specific next time
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-10-11 14:36:47+00:00): Ich meine capacity=4 ist nicht richtig. Vorgesehen ist das Abstellen nur auf der Innenseite. Auf der anderen Seite befinden sich die Parkplätze für Autos. Daher capacity=2. Sieht man auch an den Felgenkillern, die nur auf Innenseite angebracht sind.

Gruß Roger Wilco
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-10-11 14:40:56+00:00): Es gibt aber auch "Vierer" in Walsrode. Die sehen dann so aus:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=835913050395185&focus=photo&lat=52.862796542672&lng=9.5884757731805&z=17&x=0.5772564846069119&y=0.57608576524062&zoom=0.72
highpotential (2021-10-12 19:03:40+00:00): Ich bin da etwas pragmatischer unterwegs. Für mich  passen da jeweils zwei Fahrräder dran. Aber ich habe auch kein Problem damit, wenn Du das ändern willst.
Gruß
highpotential
salvoconducto (2021-10-11 13:33:56+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comments
Supaplex (2021-10-14 03:11:32+00:00): 翻譯一下好了：請用有意義的文字寫編輯變動
例如說新增善化一帶的建築
SomeoneElse (2021-11-03 11:28:38+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

Can you please explain what your source for your additions is?  I'm sure that the names that you have added are not visible on aerial imagery.

Best Regards,
Andy
OddlyAngled (2021-10-12 13:49:47+00:00): Bing is very poorly aligned around here, please check other imagery and/or Strava.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112375098
user_5359 (2021-10-11 13:42:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! This is a production database not a playground! I have reverted your change set.
user_2066394 (2021-10-12 12:01:26+00:00): Mit der Taste Q kannst du Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinklig machen.
Heininger (2021-10-12 12:13:05+00:00): Danke für den Tipp. Schon erledigt.
Wilmer Osario (2021-10-19 09:52:53+00:00): Please do not remove the name of the ramps, called "distribuidores", because those are the official and colloquial names that are given to these types of roads in Venezuela. Their names are very important in road navigation in this country.
VigotheCarpathian (2021-10-19 17:15:25+00:00): See changeset: 112667609 for details.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-12 12:23:48+00:00): edição revertida. não elimine elementos do mapa
SekeRob (2021-11-26 16:00:30+00:00): Hi

I'm surprised the Anello di Valle Giumentina does not include a side step to the historic site and eco museum. Both are within a stones throw distance. (so happen to just have mapped the areas, doing this whole Majella area momentarily)

Now if you know this area from walking, are all these heaps of rock in the landscape man made? From space it does not look natural.

ciao
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-12 12:24:52+00:00): edição revertida pelo mesmo motivo anteriormente apresentado.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-12 12:26:34+00:00): e quando há um prédio e um ponto de interesse, se já existe o ponto, não elimine o ponto e adicione a informação ao polígono do edifício.
Wilmer Osario (2021-10-19 09:52:20+00:00): Please do not remove the name of the ramps, called "distribuidores", because those are the official and colloquial names that are given to these types of roads in Venezuela. Their names are very important in road navigation in this country.
VigotheCarpathian (2021-10-19 17:15:35+00:00): See changeset: 112667609 for details.
zorglubu (2021-10-11 20:19:03+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai des questions sur ce chemin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/991964737#map=19/48.76393/2.42720
S'il s'agit d'un trottoir (sidewalk), il devrait être parallèle à une route.
D'autre part :
* il croise un autre chemin et devrait à ce moment là avoir un nœud en commun avec celui-ci
* il croise un bâtiment : s'il passe effectivement sous ce bâtiment, dites-le moi, je vous montrerai comment faire un tunnel=building_passage, sinon il faut le dévier.
Merci pour votre aide :-)
Tom94 (2021-10-12 05:16:20+00:00): Il passe juste à côté du bâtiment.
pour entrer dans le parc il ya une porte barrière qui bloque les scooters.
zorglubu (2021-10-12 11:53:28+00:00): Merci, j'ai modifié le chemin et ajouté une barrière comme celle-ci : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:barrier=cycle_barrier
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-12 12:21:39+00:00): olá Daniel, não apague os elementos existentes, edite-os. com esta sua edição, elementos que estavam há 8 anos no mapa foram eliminados e criados de novo, sem necessidade alguma. leia por favor as regras do OSM https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

cumprimentos
DanielFig (2021-10-13 13:18:45+00:00): obrigado pela informacao e peco desculpa pelas modificacoes desnecessarias. 
seguirei as boas praticas em proximas edicoes. 
os elementos que estavam há muitos anos estavam desatualizados.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-13 13:44:10+00:00): percebo Daniel, mas não os elimine, altere-os.

Continue com as boas edições e qualquer dúvida que tenha entre em contato
TuukkaH (2022-04-28 11:46:16+00:00): Hei Riku! Onkohan kommentissasi vahingossa area:highway=pedestrian, kun muokkauksissasi on kuitenkin highway=pedestrian ja area=yes? Mikä korjaantui näillä muokkauksillasi? area:highway on käytössä aika vähän ja ohjelmistot taitavat myös tukea sitä huonosti.
johan-fvh (2022-04-28 13:09:37+00:00): Tähän liittyen: kävin aiemmin tänään muuttamassa tän alueen tagitusta tuohon alun perin linkittämääsi muotoon area:highway (  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:area:highway%3Dpedestrian ); pahoittelut jos tuo muutos on häirinnyt jotain tän alueen käyttötarkoitusta.
rskedgell (2023-01-11 11:45:58+00:00): I think that bridge:structure=humpback is more appropriate for smaller bridges with a much steeper gradient than an arch-supported bridge like Blackfriars Bridge.

Possibly chosen due to ambiguity in the diagrams shown by StreetComplete?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge:structure
walkingsophie (2023-01-12 01:45:05+00:00): That is probably the reason I tagged it that way.
rskedgell (2023-01-12 08:31:05+00:00): No problem. I've changed it to bridge:structure=arch.
Gino-52 (2022-03-18 16:17:10+00:00): Hallo Rodeo,
erstmal ist es nicht schön, dass Du zu Deinen Änderungen keinen Kommentar einträgst.
Mit diesem Änderungssatz hast Du die Livingstreet Obermarkt in footway geändert. 
Soweit ich das in Erinnerung habe, dürfen dort Auto fahren. Ausserdem fahren jetzt die Buslinien MKK-61 und MKK-62 über einen Fußweg. Dies ist nicht zulässig und ich bitte Dich, die Änderung Rückgängig zu machen und wieder eine Livingstreet einzutragen.
Viele Grüße
Gino
Gino-52 (2022-03-28 18:11:14+00:00): Da bisher von Rodeo keine Reaktion erfolgt ist, habe  ich den Fußweg wieder in living_street geändert
Heinz_V (2022-01-09 21:47:19+00:00): You made correction to NH24: 
1) Please take care that the NH gets a ref-tag. 
2) each NH is part of a relation; you should update these relations.
VLD226 (2022-01-11 14:36:50+00:00): Hi Heinz_V, I added the relations back and the ref-tag as well
zorglubu (2021-10-11 17:48:37+00:00): Bonjour,
Bienvenue dans la communauté OSM.

Les chemins que vous avez touchés semblent être tous à double sens. Sinon, il faut juste veiller à ne pas avoir oneway=yes qui définit les sens uniques.
Si vous avez une question, répondez juste à mon message sur le site OSM.  :-)
Bonne continuation !
Tom94 (2021-10-11 18:44:17+00:00): Bonjour, étrange sur la carte ça mettait systématiquement une flèche dans un sens, que je pouvais inverser mais jamais mettre à double-sens. Pas trouvé le fonction yes. Merci pour la réponse !
zorglubu (2021-10-11 20:36:57+00:00): Effectivement, tous les "ways" sont orientés dans OSM (les petites flèches), même ceux définissant un bâtiment. L'étiquette oneway=yes par exemple, dira qu'il y un sens unique, mais c'est l'orientation du way qui définira la direction du sens unique.
zorglubu (2021-10-11 20:42:46+00:00): Ah, une précision. Quand on clique sur un objet, tout en bas de la zone à gauche de l'écran, on voit la liste des "attributs" résultant des choix au dessus, c'est ici qu'on peut voir le oneway=yes.
canfe (2021-10-11 16:00:52+00:00): Il name "sentiero di crinale" è ufficiale? Da quale fonte è stato preso? O è un MTB name?
Infine: i punti mi paiono parecchio distanziati. Fatto con un gpx?
Secondo me è migliorabile con altre immagini.
itasterix (2021-10-12 08:30:05+00:00): Non so se sia ufficiale ma non è un MTB name.
SI, l'ho fatto con GPX.
canfe (2021-10-17 15:49:57+00:00): Ma allora il nome "sentiero di crinale" da dove deriva??
itasterix (2021-10-18 13:53:15+00:00): Dal fatto che corre lungo il crinale della collina, lo chiamano tutti così.
Frequento abitualmente la zona.
canfe (2021-10-18 16:37:57+00:00): Ho cercato di migliorarne la geometria, se ripassi guarda se va meglio, grazie.
itasterix (2021-10-19 07:47:35+00:00): OK grazie!
DaveF (2021-10-12 09:47:12+00:00): Hi
FYI railway platforms don't require a highway tag as walking on them is their raison d'etre.
If you've time mapping them as polygons with an area=yes tag adds good detail.
RedOtter (2021-10-12 10:02:58+00:00): @DaveF
Thanks for the info, I'll remove the tags and try map as polygons later.

Appreciate it.
vasony (2021-10-17 15:17:53+00:00): Szia!
Mi a forrása? A védőnői körzeten és a google mapsen kívül? 
A hivatalos utcajegyzékben ez már nem létezik, régebben tényleg volt.

Légy szíves a változáscsomagjaidnál jelezd a forrásokat amiből rögzíted az új utcákat.

Tamás
István Szakadát (2021-10-18 07:43:54+00:00): Mivel történeti utcajegyzéket építek, ezért nekem fontos az is, amikor volt egy utca, nem csak a jelenben van, de ezt az OSM nem tudja, nem akarja kezelni, én meg figyelmetlen voltam.
vasony (2021-10-18 08:02:05+00:00): old_name-be be tudod tenni, még akár dátummal is, akár azt is ha többféle neve volt.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:old_name

pl:
old_name=Szépecske utca
vagy ha tudod a pontos dátumot
old_name=-2021-10-18=Szépecske utca 
old_name=1901-01-01--2021-10-18=Szépecske utca
canfe (2021-10-30 14:05:57+00:00): Ottimo. Attenzione che ID fa mettere erroneamente natural water a ciò che è in realtà sono riverbed. Ho risistemato un tag in merito.