piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
RicoElectrico (2022-08-11 09:56:08+00:00): Cześć, w temacie ratownictwa - jeśli znacie jakieś defibrylatory AED w Waszej okolicy, to będę wdzięczny za dodanie ich przez naszą mapkę: https://aed.openstreetmap.org.pl/

Pozdrawiam!
silversurfer83 (2022-08-11 06:28:03+00:00): Moin Zusselkopp,
warum nimmst du die 100 von der Bundesstraße?
-silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124684481
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
JhowieNitnek (2022-08-09 16:10:43+00:00): Sint-Hubertusdreef and Harasdreef aren't also in the LEZ anymore
bxl-forever (2022-08-09 17:38:37+00:00): You are right but this critic has nothing to do with *this* changeset.

After our discussion, I started editing the LEZ.  It will take something like 10 or 20 changesets to find all the parts where they changed the boundary.  It’s better to do this than one giant changeset, as it’s a lot of work every time.  I plan to do this over the next days.

I have just started this part.  The part you mention is elsewhere in the region.
user_2066394 (2022-09-15 16:03:00+00:00): Der Baum im Kreuzungsbereich wurde umgesägt?
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
user_5359 (2022-08-13 06:42:15+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/180825324. what is the meaning of the tag o = reversible? 
Did you mean oneway?
Eman_Mehrez (2022-08-17 09:06:06+00:00): Hello user_5359;
I Fixed this issue and replaced the tag with "oneway"
Regards
Eman_Mehrez
TheSwavu (2022-09-24 08:17:16+00:00): Hi,

You have modified the intersection at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085084674 so that right turns from Showground Road are no longer possible.

There is a turn lane and turn lines in the Bing imagery that suggests otherwise. Was your edit based on a survey?

Thanks.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-09 14:02:19+00:00): Hi,

Please don't name a clubhouse "Clubhouse" if you don't know the actual name. You need to tag it appropriately with golf=clubhouse
Hiblet (2022-08-09 14:27:57+00:00): Corrected.
mavl (2022-08-16 13:48:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
mavl (2022-08-16 13:47:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124972694 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124910876].
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Andrea Musuruane (2022-08-22 14:33:00+00:00): Ciao. Quando gli edifici sono contigui nella realtà, lo devono essere anche in OSM. Ad esempio, le way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085088691 e https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085088687. Inoltre, sempre per questi due edifici, su Mapillary si vede che anche le facciate sono contigue: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=377451423697728. Ciao, Andrea
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-09 14:29:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124688972 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6211
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-09 14:28:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124688972 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6211
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
RicoElectrico (2022-08-09 14:10:59+00:00): Hej, typ drogi wciąż nie wygląda mi na prawidłowy. Patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%25C3%25B3g_w_Polsce

To powinien bardziej być highway=unclassified patrząc na zdjęcia lotnicze.
RicoElectrico (2022-08-09 14:11:14+00:00): Czyli, wg szablonów iD "Droga czwartorzędna".
Neon Owl (2022-08-11 10:29:38+00:00): Ok, widzę na wiki łapie się pod polną łączącą miejscowości. Dzięki.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
elgolfo (2022-08-12 10:17:32+00:00): Hi momabebra,

was ist denn die Idee hinter dem Edit an der Kreuzung Buntzelstraße?
Du hast da einerseits die unterschiedlichen Oberflächen der Gehwege entfernt und auf einer Seite den Gehweg als separate gemappt. Dort gibt es aber sowohl je einen straßenbegleitenden Gehweg als auch auf der östlichen Seite einen separaten Gehweg direkt am Zaun.

Viele Grüße
Moritz
elgolfo (2022-08-26 08:45:19+00:00): Habe es wieder repariert.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-09 14:29:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124688972 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6211
PT-53 (2022-08-10 05:19:41+00:00): Hallo marine_geovelo,
Du hast an diesem Weg (Track) 
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/169490384/history
das Access-Merkmal
- bicycle=yes
ergänzt, was unnötig bzw. falsch ist.
Welche Nutzungsrechte bzw. -beschränkungen bei welchem Highway-Typ als Standart gelten, kannst Du hier sehen: 
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Germany 

Bitte trage Access-Merkmale nur ein, wenn durch Verkehrszeichen eine von den Default-Access-Restriction abweichende Regelung vorliegt.

Grüße
PS:
Für Fragen oder Anmerkungen bitte den Änderungssatz aufrufen und unterhalb Diskussion in das leere Feld eintragen.
marine_geovelo (2022-08-11 07:14:09+00:00): Hello, This is indeed an error related to our application. It has been corrected, thank you for your feedback.
tordans (2022-08-10 07:44:38+00:00): Hallo! Zur Info, mit diesen StreetComplete Änderungen gibt es ein Problem. Die Bürgersteige sind separat erfasst und die Daten drückten das zuvor korrekt aus. Deine Änderung sorgt jetzt für eine Dopplung der Information, was schlecht ist. Ich habe solche Änderungen auch in Neukölln schon beobachtet. Ich vermute, dass die Applikation hier eine ungünstige Ansicht wählt, so dass es zu Fehlentscheidungen kommt.
Meine Bitte ist, die Änderungen zum Thema Bürgersteig erst mal auszusetzen beziehungsweise im Anschluss noch einmal zu prüfen, ob der Bürgersteig nicht doch schon separiert erfasst war. 

Außerdem wäre sehr interessant, wenn du dir den neuen Overlay anschauen könntest zum Thema Bürgersteige. Das geht in der Applikation über die Auswahl oben rechts. Darüber kann man sehr gut sehen, wenn ein Bürgersteig sowohl an der Linie als auch separat erfasst ist.
VG
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124686447
streetcreds (2022-08-10 08:14:41+00:00): Hallo,
tut mir Leid für die Probleme. Tatsächlich habe ich mich zufällig gestern Abend noch mit dem Thema beschäftigt und selbst gemerkt, dass dies ein Fehler war. Tatsächlich kann man in der App schon das richtige Auswählen, wenn man verstanden hat, worum es geht... Jedenfalls habe ich gestern Abend eigentlich noch versucht über die App alles wieder rückgängig zu machen und hatte gehofft, dass das reicht. Aber dies ist wohl nicht angekommen?
Danke dir für den Hinweis, wenn ich gestern nicht eh schon bei meiner Recherche drauf gestoßen wäre, hätte ich es sonst gar nicht gemerkt!
Liebe Grüße
streetcreds (2022-08-10 08:17:52+00:00): Mh, doch, das scheint dann noch geklappt zu haben, mit dem undo, oder?
tordans (2022-08-10 08:32:00+00:00): Ich schaue später nochmal. Danke schonmal!
mini-me (2022-08-26 10:26:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1083861067
Может proposed?
GaM&Ko (2022-08-26 10:51:50+00:00): Конечно!!!
Спасибо!
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:20:22+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:20:20+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:20:17+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:20:15+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
Frans S (2022-09-14 12:53:56+00:00): Hello.  Thanks for mapping on this project
About your mappings.
Please map individual buildings rather than collect them and tag them as 1 building.
The standard tag for buildings is 'building=yes. Nothing else.
Best regards
habi (2022-08-22 15:17:37+00:00): Hallo neues Saniteam

Schön seid ihr hier dabei und macht bei OpenStreetMap mit.
Sind die drei Defis alle am selben Ort?
Ansonsten könnte es sich lohnen, diese einzeln einzutragen und evtl. sogar mit einem relevanten `level`-Tag fürs Stockwerk zu versehen.
E Gruess usem vordere Liebifäud,
habi
Polarbear-repair (2022-08-10 08:40:35+00:00): Hallo Molker, 
ich bitte dich, die Quellen deiner Änderungssätze anzugeben und sinnvolle Changeset-Kommentare zu benutzen. 
"Moved some knots" ist leider nichtssagend, vermutlich meinst du auch nicht 'knots' sondern 'nodes'.
 
Hinsichtlich der geplanten Autobahn kann ich mir nicht vorstellen, dass über die ganze von dir eingetragen Länge noch Bauvorbereitungen in der Landschaft erkennbar sind?
Molker (2022-08-10 08:53:56+00:00): "Moved some knots" is out, "Moved some knots" is in. Thanks!
Polarbear (2022-08-11 21:26:57+00:00): Die Antwort hilft leider nicht weiter. 
Ich weiss nicht, ob du dich nur vertippt hast oder das 'knots' absichtlich wiederholst. 
 
Insbesondere weichst du aber der eigentlichen Frage aus, nämlich:
- was die Quellen deiner Änderungssätze zu den Autobahnplanungen/-bauten sind
- was davon in der Landschaft noch erkennbar ist.
redd (2022-08-11 22:37:26+00:00): hier hat der User auch schon eine komische Relation erstellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118276968
Frans S (2022-08-11 08:21:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 

Please pay attention to these points:
Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124688126
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:22:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
mtmail (2022-08-15 14:00:41+00:00): Bei Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/164387642 ist eine '25' in das Postleitzahl Feld eingetragen. Gehört die 25 eventuell zu einem anderen Gebäude in der Nähe?
Frans S (2022-08-11 08:23:15+00:00): See my previous comment. This is not a building. No need to map it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124688232
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
skorasaurus (2022-08-09 19:32:20+00:00): Hi, 

Good to see you back :) 
Hope all is well. 

- will.
aTarom (2023-05-23 07:34:07+00:00): Hola ciutadavng, em pots ajudar amb aquests "addr:housenumber"="N/A"?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4427985310/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4427985314/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4427985315/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4427998882/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4428259442/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4442780301/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4510350163/history

no sé si interpretar-ho com a "nohousenumber"="yes" o que no es té informació del número (N/A=No Disponible?)

Salutacions
Denis_Helfer (2022-08-10 05:46:14+00:00): Hello,
Such object should not have a specific name. The tag leisure=playground  is enough. Thanks for removing the name.
Denis_Helfer (2022-08-10 05:45:28+00:00): Hello,
Such object should not have a specific name. The tag sport=boules is enough. Thanks for removing the name.
Ocliw (2022-08-10 20:26:37+00:00): I want to contribute to the map but how can i remove the name from this uploaded changeset via osmand? Or how can i update this via osm website?
Denis_Helfer (2022-08-11 06:16:05+00:00): You could use the default editor on the web : ID. I used http://level0.osmz.ru/index.php for removing the name. It's very simple : after connecting with your account, juste simply delete the line with the name and  upload the change (with a comment).
Please don't hesitate if you have any further question.
Frans S (2022-08-11 08:32:09+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124688775
czubi (2022-08-11 05:19:07+00:00): Noch eine Anmerkung, das Gebäude Garage ist nicht building und landuse sondern nur building. landuse würde an eine Landfläche kommen, z.b. wenn es ein Garagenkomplex wäre der mehrere Garagen umfasst.
HerrMüller (2022-08-11 13:29:09+00:00): Ich hab's korrigiert: Die Fläche des Garagenkomplexes ist jetzt "landuse". Die Gebäude in der Fläche sind "buildings". ok?
czubi (2022-08-11 14:03:49+00:00): Ja, prima, genau so. Ich habe bei der südlichen Garage auch noch das landuse gelöscht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-09 14:29:01+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124685746, 124685763, 124686105, 124686190, 124687461.
Frans S (2022-08-11 08:28:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
You tagged this object as landuse=residential. This tag is to be used where a number of buildings forms a settlement or village. This object can be tagged as building=construction. No roof visible
Please square each building with the Q key ! and map more accurate. This the mapping is oversized.
Best regards



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124689060
eggie (2022-08-13 17:12:47+00:00): Hi Hans..

Dit is dus echt een veel te groot gebied..
Maar dat wist je al. 😀
Gr
Eggie
Hufkratzer (2022-08-10 13:17:11+00:00): Hi, you have removed the building tag from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/667777448/history and replaced it with leisure=horse_riding. This object looks like a building in the aerial view, therefore I assume it was not intended to remove the building tag. Maybe it is a riding hall / indoor arena (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=riding_hall). The horse_riding tag is not appropriate for buildings, it is for complete riding centres, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding and some better examples in this region: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290510928 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1004974558
shamraevahelen (2022-08-09 14:47:32+00:00): And add missing road
user_12500175 (2022-08-11 14:12:56+00:00): Hallo,
nur wirkliche Eigennamen unter Namen eintragen also keine Beschreibungen wie
"gesperrter Privatweg der JVA" das kann ins Feld "Beschreibung" eingetragen werden.
Gruß
Danfost
martien-176 (2022-08-19 18:44:27+00:00): Hi, i am a HOT validator. I noticed you created some odd mappings here: dragging a node(s) from an already mapped good building so that the result is an oddly shaped, non square building.

I also noticed that this is not an incident. Almost all the mappings you created are done in this way.

Please stop doing this, you are damaging the map. And possibly harming people on the ground who are dependent on this map.

Thanks for your cooperation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124690071
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
L'imaginaire (2022-08-15 08:20:16+00:00): ✅
philippec (2022-08-10 10:21:40+00:00): Mechelen Speecqvest
Dat gebouwtje van de parking lijkt mij haaks.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=773414513545539
SPQRobin (2022-08-11 09:29:10+00:00): Ja, ik heb het wat proberen nabootsen
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-09 15:04:05+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124690163, 124690211, 124690250, 124690289, 124690306.
eggie (2022-08-09 17:11:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
MGMeedendorp (2022-08-13 09:16:55+00:00): Bedankt
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Thibault Rommel (2022-08-22 09:03:16+00:00): Hallo
Het taggen van paden gesignaleerd met C3+M* als foot=designated en bicycle=designated is niet conform de wiki en is niet in lijn met de wegcode. Wil dit opnieuw even bespreken in Slack aub?
(zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Eimai/Belgian_Roads#Paths) en https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Road_signs_in_Belgium/C_Prohibitory_signs).
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Ted Pottage (2022-08-21 14:20:39+00:00): Hi, Is it Wheelchair accessible? (See Wheelmap.org for when to code =yes
AgusQui (2022-08-22 03:08:12+00:00): Hola Alejandro, veo que aquí estas queriendo mapear una restricción de giro, para eso debes hacer una relación, aquí hay un tutorial que explica como se hace (es facil): https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/jp/mapping-for-navigation/adding-turn-restrictions/
Cualquier duda o ayuda avisame.
Langlaeufer (2022-08-09 18:22:08+00:00): Der Radweg den du gelöscht hast ist ja derzeit gesperrt, war aber neulich noch baulich in sehr schlechtem Zustand vorhanden. Soll der dauerhaft entfernt oder erneuert werden? disused:highway=cycleway wäre eine Alternative zu löschen gewesen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124691845
Nortix08 (2022-08-09 19:26:22+00:00): Die Strecke ist auf Strassenniveau eingeteert worden um während der Baumaßnahmen zum Bau der neuen Stadtbahnhaltestelle als Ausweichmöglichkeit für den KFZ Verkehr zu dienen. Von Norden kommend ist die Nutzung des Weges an der Baustelle des Archivs für Fußgänger und Radfahrer ausgeschildert. Gemäß Beschreibung unter https://www.infra-hannover.de/wiesenau/ wird dieser Radweg nicht weiter genutzt und daher habe ich den Radweg gelöscht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124691845
Langlaeufer (2022-08-09 21:31:01+00:00): o.k. alles klar. Grüße und weiterhin frohes mappen