piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kukułka (2021-11-13 18:36:53+00:00): Właśnie usunąłeś jedno z bardziej unikalnych sanktuariów na terenie Polski, miejsce o znaczeniu historycznym, bardzo ważne w regionie i poza nim, związane z historią cystersów. Być może wymagało uzupełnień w zakresie mikromapingu, jednak nie usuwania, tym bardziej, ze nie podjąłeś próby innego zmapowania miejsca.
Proszę o przywrócenie historycznego sanktuarium. Staraj się nie usuwać danych bez wizyty w terenie lub pogłębionej analizy, która nie była trudna ze względu na istniejące tagowanie.
maraf24 (2021-11-13 20:09:06+00:00): denomination=catholic ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
MxxCon (2021-11-12 22:37:47+00:00): Hello.
When mapping buildings, please make sure that they are not overlapping.
Slapping "layer=1" tag just to get the warning go away is incorrect. Please make sure buildings are accurately drawn.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113703949
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
DressyPear4 (2021-11-14 12:02:13+00:00): Olá, nomes das vias não devem ser copiados do google.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113704212
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Mashin (2021-11-12 20:01:32+00:00): Good job! Thanks
Just always check if the business already exists. For example John's Cafe is there now twice (once on the building itself and one on the node) or Wells Fargo bank
Montegro (2021-11-12 20:08:09+00:00): Thanks for the pointer, I'm new to OpenStreetMap and wasn't sure if having the Point or the Building labeled was more important or in some cases redundant or not.
pitscheplatsch (2021-11-15 08:55:38+00:00): Hi B_72, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity? Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
archpdx (2021-11-12 19:56:12+00:00): Hi Fred73000,
Both additions of not:brand:wikidata in this changeset seem to be instances in which it actually is the brand iD is trying to match it with. I've just preserved the names for NAPA via (https://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/commit/4921a9e69d5cc1eef1a4b2dee8dd28b47c79fac8) so that iD won't suggest to replace the name tag for shops like Raleigh Hills Automotive with unique names. Until the next version of NSI is released, I suggest that you ignore instances of iD matching to NAPA instead of adding a not:brand:wikidata tag.

As for Bike Gallery, all of their stores have been rebranded to Trek after they were bought out. See https://bikeportland.org/2021/01/26/bike-gallery-owner-sells-all-six-portland-stores-to-trek-bicycle-corp-325215

Please consult other sources before adding not:brand:wikidata in places you're unfamiliar with in the future.

-archpdx
user_8101879 (2021-11-13 17:52:16+00:00): Ok, sorry for my mistakes.
Best regards
skyper (2021-12-08 14:14:15+00:00): Hallo Timoteo
Ich habe ein paar Fragen zu den angegebenen Verkehrsschildern (traffic_sign=*) an den Fahrradstraßen.
Hängt da wirklich das Zusatzzeichen 1024-10 oder doch "Kfz-frei"? Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Verkehrszeichen_in_Deutschland#Mehrspurige_Fahrzeuge_frei_DE:1024
Bei Einbahnstraßen als Fahrradstraße in beide Richtungen stehen wohl unterschiedliche Schilder je Fahrtrichtung, dann sollte `traffic_sign:forward` und `traffic_sign:backward` verwendet werden.

Fragende Grüße,
skyper

P.S.: Zuletzt ist die Formulierung der StVO missraten und wenn nicht ein allgemeines "frei" oder "Anlieger frei" angebracht ist sind theoretisch Pferde, Fuhrwerke und Handkarren von einer Fahrradstraße ausgeschlossen (vehicle=no, horse=no). :)
skyper (2021-12-08 14:16:03+00:00): Sorry, jetzt habe ich die Einbahnstraßen vergessen anzugeben:
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31797419
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/149866206
FraukeLeo (2024-02-01 11:10:51+00:00): Hallo wermak, lies mal https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-January/thread.html#42191 - die von dir verlinkte Tabelle hat ein einzelner User mal undiskutiert als seine Privatmeinung reingesetzt, und die zugrundliegende Regel "bei Link immer die höhere Klasse taggen" ist keinesfalls unumstritten. Mein Standpunkt: Ein Link von einem primary auf einen tertiary kann keine höhere Verkehrsbedeutung haben als der angebundene tertiary und sollte daher entweder selbst tertiary oder tertiary_link sein. Anders sieht es bei Autobahnanschlüssen aus, wo die Ausfahrt noch bis zum Autobahn-Ende-Schild eindeutig Autobahn und damit motorway_link ist.
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 16:52:52+00:00): You added many weird tags here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/939555003/history

they have been cleaned up once already: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104723586

you have been asked about them already: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107998955

Can you explain what this tags are? They look like an import.
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 16:54:06+00:00): also please use good changeset comments instead of "actualización" every time, see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
muralito (2021-11-14 01:04:55+00:00): There arent trunk links here. just a lane for left turn.
CapAhab (2021-11-15 16:28:27+00:00): I now see it is not a divided lane, I will updated the geometry and and map it as a turn lane
Carto'Cité (2022-01-05 09:14:31+00:00): Bonjour Teuxe,
J'ai vu que tu as décrit ce double sens cyclable : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001815233
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001815244
Je pense que cette manière de le décrire même si elle est entendable, n'est pas utilisée par les rendus et les calculateurs. Si ça te va je fais quelques compléments. À ta disposition pour en discuter.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
gpserror (2021-11-13 23:28:29+00:00): Roundabout (OSM way 1001821017) is going clockwise, isn't this unusual in the USA?
gpserror (2022-01-17 20:58:18+00:00): I fixed in changeset 115229508, hope this is correct, cant see imagery
mavl (2021-11-13 09:20:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет со здания (гаража) тег здания (building). Этот тег не нужно удалять.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/287293944/history  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:building
mavl (2021-11-13 09:24:39+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок изменяет номер здания с 55 на 55а. В OpenStreetMap в номерах домов используют большие буквы (55А).  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Addresses
ivanbranco (2021-11-14 13:45:10+00:00): Ciao giuseppec,

i tag sono generalmente tutti in Inglese per convenzione, quindi consegna a domicilio=yes non va bene, puoi usare delivery=yes però al suo posto. (C'è anche takeaway=* per l'asposto)
mariotomo (2021-11-13 19:54:31+00:00): hola. gracias al ADT por mejorar los datos en el país.  no entiendo el comentario: "Ortografía actualizada"?  pues no cambiaste el nombre.  no conozco el lugar, y no soy latinoamericano.  sin embargo me suena más como Corotú con tilde al final.
kqmaps (2021-11-16 20:30:58+00:00): ¡Hola mariotomo! Gracias por contactarme. Reutilicé mi comentario de conjunto de cambios anterior donde corregí la ortografía de esta calle gracias a la aportación de un usuario del Mapa. En este conjunto de cambios eliminé la etiqueta de origen.
mariotomo (2021-11-16 21:05:12+00:00): Aha, I see... But what is the added value of removing the reference to the Kaart survey?
kqmaps (2021-11-17 20:05:37+00:00): That is a good point. It looks like the previous editor was a Kaart person and they added their survey as the source tag, but since I used the source I mentioned above in this edit I thought the previous source tag no longer applied.
mariotomo (2021-11-17 20:11:39+00:00): precisely: you can't have read the name from Maxar.  while Kaart performed a survey.  the name of the road still comes from that survey.  maybe replace `source` with `source:name`?
puchaczowsky (2021-11-13 16:33:58+00:00): Do wycofania
Dawid2849 (2021-11-13 17:10:05+00:00): Wycofałem
aceman444 (2021-11-18 21:00:16+00:00): Preco ste tu stanicu Velke Kostolany pridali ako clena do relacie (ked ine stanice tam nie su) a to "railway:ref" ste dali ako rolu tohto clena? To nema ziadne opodstatnenie podla wiki.
18Lub06bik92 (2021-11-18 23:43:45+00:00): bez komentára
aceman444 (2021-11-18 23:54:59+00:00): Asi preto, ze Vasa prva zmena v OSM:) Tak nabuduce prosim pozor na take veci.
muralito (2021-11-14 00:59:11+00:00): Hi. IMHO the new bypass shold be raised to primary, as is it the new trace of ruta 21, and the old segments should now be downgraded to secondary or tertiary in the urban area.
what do you think?
CapAhab (2021-11-15 17:29:52+00:00): Hi, swapping the classifications makes sense to me.  I didn't see any documentation if the new way was intended to be ruta 21 or not, so for now I left the urban ways as they were.
fs_LT (2025-12-10 12:58:46+00:00): schau dir mal https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001831431 an bitte; kann weg?
abakus_uploader (2021-11-12 23:32:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
EP_Repair (2021-12-15 22:43:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114980221 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000225 where opportunity was given to respond or correct issues and no action was taken by thelidarking see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114968909
rab (2021-11-13 22:29:18+00:00): Current imagery is from maxar.
Only accessible with josm at the moment.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-13 11:02:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113725893 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious edits in Italy.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5447 and previous blocks on this mapper, and previous comments on changesets.
highflyer74 (2021-11-13 09:46:20+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

In diesem Fall sollten auch die restlichen, nur die Postfiliale betreffenden Tags, vom Objekt entfernt werden. Ich habe das eben erledigt. Danke Dir!
mosquito-magnet (2021-11-14 22:02:12+00:00): Moin, und danke!

Ich war mir hier nicht sicher was korrekt ist: Das Gebäude wird weiterhin von der Deutschen Post genutzt, und ist auch noch so von außen erkennbar, aber ist nicht mehr für die Öffentlichkeit zugänglich / bietet keine Dienstleistungen mehr an. Das hätte ich im Kommentar vielleicht deutlich machen sollen.

Sollten in dem Fall vielleicht name oder auch operator stehen bleiben?
Wolthusen (2021-11-19 07:46:22+00:00): Gibt es tatsächlich einen städtischen Beschluss, das Eisenbahndock in "Neuer Delft" umzubennen?
Jodocus up Straat (2021-11-21 23:15:45+00:00): Moin, ich meine, man sollte den aktuell gebräuchlichen Namen verwenden. Ob es dazu überhaupt einen Ratsbeschluss geben wird oder muss, weiß ich nicht. Mein Eindruck war, dass als Name für das Gewässer in der Presse "Neuer Delft" bereits häufiger verwendet wird als "Eisenbahndock". Auf Google Earth/Maps ist das Gewässer auch bereits mit "Neuer Delft" beschriftet, auf der Topographischen Karte des Niedersächsischen Landesvermessungsamtes noch nicht, nur der Platz am Ende mit "Neuer-Delft-Platz". Ist denn in der Emder Bevölkerung der neue Name noch nicht angekommen? In diesem Fall bitte ich um Rückmeldung, dann würde ich meine Änderung rückgängig machen. Gruß aus Leer, Jodocus
Wolthusen (2021-11-22 08:13:15+00:00): Moin!
Das Thema ist wirklich nicht ganz einfach. "Neuer Delft" sagen - zumindest nach meiner Wahrnehmung - im Wesentlichen neu Zugezogene, die den Namen aus der Werbung für das Baugebiet kennen, und Leute die dort Wohnen.
-
Google Maps nehme ich bei solchen Sachen nicht ernst, weil ich das Gefühl habe, dass die auch aus OSM kopieren (oder Google-Nutzer Änderungen in OSM an Google melden und das dann dort ohne Prüfung eingepflegt wird). Der Name Neuer Delft tauchte z.B. bei Google Maps auf, kurz nachdem jemand das bei Beginn der Vermarktung des Baugebietes in OSM geändert hatte. Das hatte ich damals wieder rückgängig gemacht, bei Google steht das aber seitdem so. Bei POI habe ich das auch schon mehrfach beobachtet.
-
Gruß aus Emden,

  Thomas
Jodocus up Straat (2021-11-22 13:56:47+00:00): Das sind interessante Erfahrungen. OSM sollte nicht als Marketinginstrument dienen. Ich habe das Gewässer nun mit name=Eisenbahndock und alt_name=Neuer Delft getaggt. Mal sehen, wie es sich weiter entwickelt.
maraf24 (2022-01-11 10:53:39+00:00): Skasowałeś tu budynek szkoły: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/351668480
user_14117678 (2022-01-11 13:04:14+00:00): Poprawione już
gscscnd (2022-06-27 10:27:36+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2850701
Kseniya_Nekrasava (2021-11-16 05:58:26+00:00): Hi! Do you have any sources for the name of the street? I have doubts about that.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113709601
EP_Repair (2021-12-15 22:43:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114980221 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000225 where opportunity was given to respond or correct issues and no action was taken by thelidarking see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114968909
EP_Repair (2021-12-15 22:43:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114980221 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000225 where opportunity was given to respond or correct issues and no action was taken by thelidarking see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114968909
EP_Repair (2021-12-15 22:44:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114980221 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000225 where opportunity was given to respond or correct issues and no action was taken by thelidarking see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114968909
Oskarst_ (2023-03-23 13:57:33+00:00): Nygaarden har åpnet
https://kommunikasjon.ntb.no/pressemelding/nygaarden-har-apnet-dorene?publisherId=16126567&releaseId=17951481
Mathias Haugsbø (2023-03-23 16:51:04+00:00): Stemmer, jeg har oppdatert området nå https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134031469
Geo-Tobi (2025-01-11 13:23:38+00:00): Bzgl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/239039040

Das Tagging ist mit Vz260+1020-30 angegeben. 
Das ist NICHT Access=permit. Irgendwas passt daher nicht zusammen. Bitte um Prüfung und Korrektur.
Grüße
Wegeschlenzer (2025-01-11 23:19:15+00:00): hab ich wohl mit "landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei", also +1026-36, verwechselt. Denn da sind ja nur Felder links+rechts... Schau ich mir aber nochmal vor Ort genau an.
Jedenfalls super, dass OSM von so sorgfältigen Mappern wie dir konsistent gehalten wird. Mir ist das auch sehr wichtig und hoffe, mehr Sinnvolles als Falsches/Verwirrendes einzubringen. Du hilfst mir dabei - auch wenns dich vielleicht nervt!?!
Grüße
Wegeschlenzer
pio2_122 (2021-11-12 21:13:50+00:00): Droga ta ma co najwyżej znaczenie w skali regionalnej, a nie krajowej, więc highway=primary tu nie pasuje.
Sugerują to np. drogowskazy na węźle Szczecin Podjuchy - występuje tam jedynie kierunek do dzielnicy Podjuchy; a nie jak na sąsiednich węzłach: do Kostrzyna nad Odrą (granica PL-D), Szczecina (jako całego miasta, a nie konkretnej dzielnicy) [w. Radziszewo]; Rosówka (granica PL-D), Szczecina (jako całego miasta, a nie konkretnej dzielnicy) [w. Szczecin Zachód]; Lubieszyna (granica PL-D), Bydgoszczy i centrum Szczecina [w. Kijewo].

Za OSM-wiki:
- "Znacznik highway=primary ("droga pierwszorzędna") służy do oznaczania głównych dróg w systemie transportowym danego kraju."

- "Znacznik highway=secondary ("droga drugorzędna") służy do oznaczania drogi stanowiącej istotne połączenie w krajowej sieci dróg, ale niebędącej częścią krajowych i międzynarodowych korytarzy tranzytowych."

Swoją drogą, przez wiele lat ten odcinek był oznaczony jako highway=tertiary i wszystko działało w porządku (mam na myśli m.in. nawigacje korzystające z OSM), nikt nie narzekał. Dopiero 8 miesięcy temu dostał highway=secondary… W związku z tym, jak dla mnie, ciągłe podwyższanie kategorii tej drogi jest w po prostu mapowaniem pod render.
aceman444 (2021-11-18 20:55:24+00:00): Kovovykup vyzera ako zberne suroviny, ci recyklacne stredisko (cize amenity=recycling), preco ste tam dali obchod s lacnymi drobnostami (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:shop%3Dvariety_store) ?
18Lub06bik92 (2021-11-18 23:45:17+00:00): bez komentára vam prosim
aceman444 (2021-11-20 23:56:08+00:00): Nerozumiem. Aka je odpoved?
EP_Repair (2021-12-15 22:44:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114980221 where the changeset comment is: revert damaging golf course edits as per Ticket#2021121310000225 where opportunity was given to respond or correct issues and no action was taken by thelidarking see also https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114968909
EP_Repair (2021-12-15 22:58:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114981737 where the changeset comment is: follow up revert per https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5535
pantufla (2023-09-01 08:19:07+00:00): Hola, buenas, por qué esta qubrada está como -1? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1001864912#map=16/10.5162/-66.5191
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-13 09:36:51+00:00): Ciao. Mi sembra che le villette a schiera fossero inserite in un modo corretto, seguendo le regole descritte nella wiki. Se proprio si voleva essere più precisi, si poteva inserire anche house=terraced sulle singole unità immobiliari: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:house%3Dterraced Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113712027
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 09:53:49+00:00): Ciao Andrea, io ho seguito questo approccio della wiki:
"A third approach is to tag the outline of the entire physical structure with building=terrace, and inside the outline, draw the borders of each individual dwelling and tag it with building:part=house" Per dare sia il value terrace all'outline e mantenere al contempo il dettaglio delle singole unita abitative.
Prima le singole unita abitative erano mappate come building=terrace che dalla Wiki mi sembrava andasse bene solo per l'outline complessiva: "This tag is most commonly used as a less-detailed option to define the outline of a linear row of residential dwellings which form a terrace."
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 09:55:01+00:00): Se preferisci che elimino l'outline e trasformo le building:part in building=house+house=terraced fammelo sapere e procedo alla modifica, no problem
Andrea Musuruane (2021-11-13 09:59:26+00:00): Sì, grazie :-)
ivanbranco (2021-11-13 10:49:41+00:00): Fatto!
aceman444 (2022-04-03 15:07:52+00:00): Hi, how are those pedestrians prohibited on those roads? Show me the traffic signs. Thanks
If there is no traffic sign, you cannot add foot=no. Use at most foot=use_sidepath.
eumiro (2022-04-03 19:21:58+00:00): Good catch! These were my beginnings with StreetComplete and soon after this I realized this question was confusing and I disabled it in the settings. There might be some relics though. Thanks for pointing out.
Frans S (2021-12-13 11:05:31+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
F: buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113712263
aceman444 (2021-11-18 00:12:22+00:00): Zdravim, pisete, ze je to hostel (ubytovna), ale zadali ste ako hotel. A naozaj sa vola JDM s.r.o., nie je to len nazov prevadzkovatela?
18Lub06bik92 (2021-11-18 01:21:49+00:00): Ahoj Dobry ano je Hotel aj Ubytovna ano sa vola JDM s.r.o
aceman444 (2021-11-21 10:29:36+00:00): Tak preco ste potom zmenili nazov na "JDM s.r.o. Veľké Kostoľany" ?