piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2022-08-20 22:30:46+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-08-20 22:31:16+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
GBAB (2022-08-23 12:39:15+00:00): Kedves Hungarian_user!

Légy szíves, megfontoltan használd a különféle AI-segédleteket, mert ha nem egészen egyértelmű az épület körvonala, akkor eléggé elnagyolt eredményt tudnak adni, mint például itt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087747455

Az utcában egy csomó más ház is elég furcsa szögben áll, illetve a műholdfelvétel alapján nyilvánvalóan nem úgy néz ki, mint ahogy most ott van.

Például https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087747462 vagy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087747459 stb.

A mennyiség helyett talán érdemes inkább a minőségre törekedni.

Illetve mindig a FÖMI ortofotóit érdemes alapul venni, mert azok a legpontosabbak (bár a felbontásuk lehetne nagyobb). Hozzájuk lehet igazítani a többi műholdképet.

Köszönjük!

Gábor
kaciorx (2022-09-04 07:39:27+00:00): Usuwam bo dubel
MxxCon (2022-08-21 03:30:16+00:00): Hello.
It appears that you tagged steps as pedestrian area. That seems very wrong.. Could you please elaborate on this edit?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125156912
Djdnfivkenfnfnfdncnnd (2022-08-21 16:43:13+00:00): They are steps, but no option currently exists for them. The only two option are “exercise steps” which are for exercising, and “indoor staircase” which is indoors. “Pedestrian area” seemed like the best option.
MxxCon (2022-08-21 17:10:57+00:00): But that is misleading and mistaging, especially when it comes to wheelchair or other accessible routing. Not every square millimeter of walkable surface needs to be covered by some sort of area.
Djdnfivkenfnfnfdncnnd (2022-08-21 18:49:35+00:00): I agree. Some other step areas are also marked as pedestrian areas, but I will remove this. Instead, I will add paths with steps.
MxxCon (2022-08-21 19:03:06+00:00): 👍
But please don't map steps along their width the way I've seen elsewhere in the area. That's also incorrect.
abakus_uploader (2022-08-20 22:31:18+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
fridgelord (2022-08-21 06:58:40+00:00): Cześć! Budynek, który dodałem, ma te  trzy znaczniki dodane. Natomiast według drugiego posta na podlinkowanym w komentarzu ten budynek powinien mieć tylko znaczniki addr:place, addr:housenumber i addr:postcode. Czy powinienem zmienić na ten format?
fridgelord (2022-08-21 06:59:24+00:00): *według drugiego posta na podlinkowanym w komentarzu wątku
Konkon153 (2022-08-20 18:15:29+00:00): [ und damit alle 1738 aktuell vorhandenen Adressen in der Gemeinde Crivitz vollständig angepasst ]
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:38+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:36+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:34+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:31+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:29+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:27+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:25+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:22+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:20+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:17+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:15+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:12:04+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
gyulasimonyi (2022-12-10 11:11:54+00:00): Note: I've done large data imports of glacier data into OSM from GLIMS (http://glims.colorado.edu/glacierdata/, also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GLIMS_Glacier_Database), specifically for the area called the Wakhan Corridor in NE Afghanistan that I know relatively well. All these changesets contain individually checked changes, polygon by polygon. I've also done improvements on the 'poorly vectorization' polygons before import, as this is a known issue with much of GLIMS data.
silversurfer83 (2022-08-22 12:39:13+00:00): Moin :)
An dieser Stelle möchte ich Dir allgemein die Lektüre des Wiki ans Herz legen. Speziell auf diese Änderung von Dir bezogen: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen (zB das Feuerwehrhaus, der Grillplatz)
Außerdem sieht dein landuse=farmyard so aus, als würder er andere landuse kreuzen. Guck da nochmal drauf.

Weiter viel Spaß
silversurfer83
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125159068
eggie (2022-08-20 19:07:33+00:00): De parkingplaatsen heb ik weer aangepast..  Kijk even welke tags er op staan.
groet
eggie
Nicrub (2022-08-21 08:40:15+00:00): @openstreetmap your program is used to kill street dogs and cats in Turkey by havrita@havritacom. I believe this is against your policy, yet you are used to enable this. If you don’t put stop to this, there will be many more animal death and cruelty. Please STOP them.
VA00 (2026-03-10 16:44:31+00:00): Co to miało być? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087763152/history
B_KSL (2026-03-11 13:07:53+00:00): Już nie pamiętam a nie chce mi się teraz przeglądać historii. Jakaś pozostałość po poprawionych zdublowanych granicach chyba. Nie opisana i w tej chwili do niczego niepotrzebna linia. Usunąłem. Dzięki!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:35:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
E de Wit (2022-08-20 20:41:27+00:00): Top, dank voor het herstellen! Door de grootte van het herstelwerk in West aan Zee heb ik deze niet gezien
danieldegroot2 (2022-08-20 20:29:24+00:00): Dat wordt nog wat met die bomen :-)
Lachgast (2022-08-20 20:33:23+00:00): Ja, hè? Ik zit er een beetje mee in de maag. Grasland is het niet, dus er 'moet' wat mee, want voor een wandelaar is het een heel verschil of een pad aan weerszijden beboomd is.

Bomenrijen zeggen niet altijd wat (en moet je er dan twee of drie intekenen? En wat doet dat met het kaartbeeld?)

Maar goed, als een ander denkt: dit kan je beter weergeven met twee-vier bomenrijen... dan snap ik dat. Zeker gezien de lengte van het Amsterdam-Rijnkanaal...
user_2066394 (2022-08-20 22:40:22+00:00): Monitor
Anas masuris (2022-08-22 08:56:01+00:00): Kiedy niby zostały skonstruowane te tory? Na orto ich nie widać ani nie pamiętam, aby były prowadzone w tym miejscu ostatnio roboty w celu wybudowania rozjadów. Więc?
Anas masuris (2022-08-22 09:11:18+00:00): Usunięte
marczoutendijk (2023-03-20 20:06:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14480287/history

surface=5115 is not a valid value for that tag.
You were the first one to use it.
What does it mean?
derloris (2025-04-30 00:18:31+00:00): Hallo! Hier hast du mit einer Punktmarkierung am Feuerwehrweg access=private getaggt - zumindest früher früher konnte und durfte man zu Fuß aber ganz normal durchgehen (Schwingtüre nur zum Abhalten von Durch_fahrten_). Falls sich nichts geändert hat, würde ich's daher auf vehicle=private ändern. LG
Schnitzl1 (2025-05-04 09:30:26+00:00): Hallo, ist zwar schon etwas her, aber soweit ich mich erinnern kann, habe ich den tag im Zuge eines Radausfluges gesetzt, da mein Navi mich dort hindurchgelotst hätte, vor Ort aber die Durchfahrt mit einem Schild verwehrt wurde. Kann sein, dass ein Begehen zu Fuß möglich ist, das kann ich aber leider nicht bestätigen, weil ich den Inhalt des Schildes nicht mehr kenne. Warst du die letzten Tage mal dort zugegen?
LG
derloris (2025-05-04 14:52:40+00:00): Ah ok, bei mir ist es auch schon länger her und ich weiß nicht, wann ich wieder durchkomme; aber ich habe jetzt eine Notiz erstellt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4738487 vielleicht kommt jemand demnächst vorbei und kann es bereits lösen. LG
derloris (2025-07-31 20:55:46+00:00): Hallo, ich war nun dort und es war gar kein Schild vorhanden. Das swing gate (mit Zahlenschloss zum Öffnen) hält also eigentlich durch seine Existenz alle mehrspurigen Fahrzeuge ab, durchzufahren, aber zu Fuß und eigentlich auch mit dem Rad kommt man aber daneben vorbei. Ich habs jetzt auf motor_vehicle=private geändert. LG
Schnitzl1 (2025-08-07 11:41:43+00:00): Ok alles klar, danke dir für die nochmalige OTG-Inspektion und die Korrektur.
LG
Anas masuris (2022-08-22 09:17:22+00:00): Do wycofania
NieWnen (2022-08-22 19:10:23+00:00): Wycofane (125241416)
Diacritic (2022-08-21 08:55:13+00:00): Hi Warsu. In this edit, you seem to have added duplicate tram tracks on each lane?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125161987
Anas masuris (2022-08-22 09:14:42+00:00): You had better revert those changes. This user has been applying false information in other places as well - non-existing tracks for example in Warsaw
eggie (2022-08-20 21:09:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 
Feedback.. Tip.. Niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Dat geeft vaak schade. Doe zoiets in twee upload. Op een wandepad hoef je geen bicycle=no toe te voegen. Dat is default.
Wanneer een weg door een gebouw heen loopt is alleen de weg onder het gebouw zelf de building_passage.

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-08-20 21:22:26+00:00): unclassified heb ik omgetagd naar highway=service
layer=-1 en incline verwijderd.
building_passage verwijderd van overige delen.. behalve die door de gebouwen lopen. 
groet eggie
eggie (2022-08-20 21:26:32+00:00): straatnaam= **currently unnamed**  verwijderd.
Dat is niet gebruikelijk.
eggie (2022-08-21 11:31:22+00:00): Dag early  Je vraagt feedback.

old_name toevoegen aan een wegdeel kan wel, maar waarom aan elke node en knoopunt likjkt me allemaal niet correct.
Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125162386

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-21 11:34:06+00:00): Volgens mij kan dit beter teruggedraaid worden en overnoeuw beginnen. Dat lijkt me minder werk dan al die node opsnorren.
eggie (2022-08-21 11:39:20+00:00): Terugdraaien kan al niet goed meer, want je hebt al weer wat aangepast daarna.
Waarom alle nodes een straatnaam gegeven? 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-21 11:48:00+00:00): Ik heb zo veel mogelijk straatnamen van de nodes gehaald die met de wegen zijn verbonden. In welke wiki heb je geleden dat je straatnamen aan de nodes moet geven? Het lijkt me niet gewenst.
Check nog even over er nog een paar staan. Let op, want sommige nodes zijn knooppunten van de routes. Dus niet de nodes verwijderen, maar alleen de straatnaam eraf halen.
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.

MVG
eggie
earlyistimeless (2022-08-21 15:15:08+00:00): Oeps, ik had een selectie op basis van: highway=* & name=<straatnaam>; vervolgens alles geselecteerd (dus zonder dat ik het door had ook alle nodes), en daarop de tags toegevoegd. Ik zal kijken of ik zo enkel alle nodes kan selecteren en de tags daarop kan verwijderen.
eggie (2022-08-21 15:28:35+00:00): Oke.. Dat dacht ik al..  Anders even 
Overpass gebruiken om een query te in te voeren
https://overpass-turbo.eu/

name=....
eggie (2022-08-21 15:31:54+00:00): typo old_name=...
eggie (2022-08-21 15:33:53+00:00): Hier nog een paar https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1led

even op uitvoeren klikken

groet
eggie
earlyistimeless (2022-08-21 15:38:35+00:00): Ik heb met een paar filters: old_name="naam" type:node de tags verwijderd
eggie (2022-08-21 16:38:43+00:00): Top!
eggie (2022-08-20 21:12:37+00:00): Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus is niet aan te raden. Je verplaatst ongemerkt nodes met alles wat er aan vastzit.
foot=yes hoef je niet toe te voegen aan een fietspad. Dat is default.

Veel plezier met mappen. 
eggie
kwiatek_123 (2022-08-21 13:34:30+00:00): Jak coś to chodnik i ścieżkę rowerową od Chłopickiego do ronda przy Makowskiej poprawiałem, wyrównywałem itp.
user_5359 (2022-08-21 10:17:03+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/799310744 (one of twelve ways). Please notice your typo of tracktype. Could you please correct this (unfortunately I didn‘t have access to a useful editor in this moment)
gendy54 (2024-12-11 22:24:09+00:00): tu confirmes que la gendarmerie est fermée ?
Je retrouve encore son existence dans l'opendata du ministère ce mois-ci.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
Gracianne (2022-09-07 00:07:03+00:00): Olá @adrianojbr!
Mandei uma mensagem para voce, pois estamos trabalhando em um artigo sobre o mapeamento da reserva volta velha.  Gostaria de entender seu conjunto de alterações, para agregar o conteúdo do artigo. Obrigada
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-08-25 07:55:26+00:00): لماذا قمت بهذا الحذف والتخريب؟؟؟؟
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-08-25 07:57:21+00:00): تم عكس هذا التغيير:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125346638
Jalblan (2022-11-22 22:19:35+00:00): Batería defensiva de la Ría de Ares para evitar invasiones.
Jalblan (2022-11-22 22:21:47+00:00): Batería defensiva de la Ría de Ares para evitar invasiones. En 1797 estaba dotada de 4 cañones U de a 12. Batería defensiva de la Ría de Ares para evitar invasiones. Hoy en día dentro de su recinto se encuentra el edificio del club de remo de Redes.
kartler175 (2022-09-08 16:23:54+00:00): Something went wrong here:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-75.65626&lat=45.44129&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
DannyMcD (2022-09-09 02:38:49+00:00): I've fixed this issue and searched for other similar issues caused by the same group of changesets (I didn't find any).  Thanks for bringing this to my attention.  Unfortunately, this sort of thing is hard to avoid when editing interwoven boundary relations.
MxxCon (2022-08-21 03:35:14+00:00): Hello.
Wouldn't a gift shop be a better tag for this?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125164310
Mannivu (2022-08-21 11:39:43+00:00): Yes, you're right. I couldn't find that tag on the app so I sticked with general. But gift it's definitely a better tag. Thank you!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125164310
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-20 22:27:54+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 125052904, 125053197, 125053911, 125054302, 125054506, 125054824, 125055056, 125055304, 125055501, 125056360, 125056409, 125059117, 125059432, 125061299, 125082714, 125104735, 125105161, 125105904, 125106329, 125109844, 125111052, 125111260, 125112376, 125114582, 125135415, 125137881, 125138807, 125146397.
bxl-forever (2022-08-21 00:09:07+00:00): Hello,

Thanks for updating shops and other places.

Maybe two pieces of advice here, I hope this will help you make better contributions.

1) If a place is gone, do NOT destroy the point.  Because then we will lose history—we sometimes use this, for instance to see all the shops that were there through the last years.  If a place is gone, the best way is to put "shop=vacant" in the tags and remove the tags associated with the previous shop.

In this example, since you found that Loving Hut is gone and has already been replaced by Fonske, I think it would have been better to re-use the same point and just change the tags on it.

2) If a shop is located inside a building that only has one address, you don’t have to fill the address tags on the shop too; it works perfectly fine without them.  People who look for a shop will see the address in the search results anyway, it is generated automatically.  That is a great time-saver and it makes the database lighter.

Happy mapping.
Peter Muret (2025-07-06 11:08:17+00:00): Ich habe den Weg wieder zusammengefügt. T5 ist deutlich zu schwierig angegeben finde ich, auch in anderen Tourenberichten im Internet wird nur T4 oder sogar T3 angegeben. Zum Beispiel: https://www.hikr.org/dir/Hoher_Riffler_15581/