piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-06-02 17:08:11+00:00): Can you take a look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4276120 ?
Friendly_Ghost (2023-03-10 12:56:37+00:00): Hello. Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3368129640 closed or did you mean "closed on Wednesdays"?
Ryccardo (2023-03-11 08:53:46+00:00): Seems like I got distracted!
The second, should have been "We off"!
opendcc (2022-11-20 20:13:51+00:00): Was genau war am Tagging des Landuses als 'Gewerbegebeit Steeg' flasch? Ich bitte um eine Erläuterung.
geow (2022-11-21 22:06:26+00:00): @TRIUSO Qualitätswerkzeuge GmbH, bitte sachlich und freundlich bleiben. opendcc ist ein zuverlässiger Mapper mit langjähriger Erfahrung. Was konkret wurde aus deiner Sicht zerstört? name=* wird nur für echte Eigennamen benutzt, für Beschreibungen nutzen wir description=*
Mehr dazu hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben
Grüße,
geow
geow (2022-11-21 22:19:08+00:00): @TRIUSO Qualitätswerkzeuge GmbH
hier ein Beispiel für angemessenes name-tagging in einem Gewerbegebiet:
https://osm.org/go/0JCIXBloQ-
opendcc (2022-11-20 20:12:32+00:00): Guten Abend, haben Sie schon mal überlegt, ob Sie hier sinnvoll und angemessen agieren? Es gibt Regeln für das Benennen von Objekten und es gibt Regeln für den Umgang miteinander. Hier zwei Hinweise dazu: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Namen#name_ist_nur_der_Name und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Vielen Dank fürs Beachten!
gscscnd (2022-11-20 19:47:49+00:00): Jak już jest punkt adresowy z kompletnym adresem, to nie bardzo jest sens dodawać niekompletny adres do budynku.
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-30 06:32:06+00:00): Is there a reason for adding "abandoned" railways that clearly don't exist everywhere where you added it?  There is definitely no railway going through the buildings in Pokeville and across most of those highways (I-81 and NY-41).

The wiki states:
"A tag to map former railways, where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible with ties/sleepers, signals or other railroad right of way signs or infrastructure."

Source:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dabandoned

There are definitely no ties/sleepers or signals where there are buildings, parking lots and roads.

I'm curious as to why you are continuing to map things that have no ground-truth and can not be verified with even an extensive ground survey (such as across the parking lots and buildings) which have long replaced what *may* have been a railway at some point, but definitely not anymore.

If it is for "historical" reasons, it would probably be best to add it to OpenHistoricalMaps, rather than OpenStreetMaps where it supposed to be what exists "today".  You can find more about OHM at: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map
CurlingMan13 (2022-11-30 06:52:56+00:00): I want to apologize.  In looking at this more in depth with another mapped, it appears the segment in question was added a long time ago, so I shouldn't have jumped on it, but it appears that it should be cleaned up regardless, since it doesn't appear to exist anymore.

The spurs you added I can confirm exist and they look well mapped.

Before I go ahead and clean up the railways to match what is currently there now, I wanted to get your concurrence that some segments definitely don't exist anymore.
RussNelson (2022-12-07 21:15:12+00:00): Some segments have been razed, which justified tagging them with "razed". I'm opposed to deleting them entirely because I don't know, and you don't now, that more field work might find evidence of them. For example, a metal detector could very likely find spikes, as some are always to be found. Or higher resolution LIDAR might show a shadow in a field.

If someone added something, it's always a good idea to leave it there.
rgbimport (2023-09-24 11:15:32+00:00): Hay una señal de rotonda, aunque también haya semáforos. Si los semáforos están apagados o en ámbar se aplica la señal vertical.
Antonio Eugenio Burriel (2023-09-24 18:36:31+00:00): Hola rgbimport, tienes toda la razón del mundo, en el caso que indicas aplica marcar la intersección circular como rotonda.

Recuerdo que cambié estas etiquetas en la intersección de Avenida del Padre Piquer con Calle del Tembleque.
¿Puedes indicarme por favor si has detectado esta u otra distinta para poder corregirlo?

¡Muchas gracias!
BartekChom (2025-01-25 10:38:28+00:00): W skrócie: Przepraszam, residential=apartments dałeś na obszarze szeregowców z rozpędu, czy źle rozumiem znaczenie tego znacznika i pasuje tam?

Chaotyczna historia: Dopiero co doczytałem, że building=apartments i residential=apartments oznacza bloki, wykorzystałem w paru miejscach, ale widzę residential=apartments na obszarze szeregowców. W tej edycji utworzyłeś linię https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115787118, w kwietniu 2024 przerobiłem ją na relację https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/17513691, ale nie wiem, czy residential=apartments dodałeś z rozpędu (niby możliwe, że to ja coś naknociłem (chociaż nie kojarzę, żebym mocno zmieniał ten obszar) albo że skopiowałeś tagi z czegoś starszego - nie wiem, czy jest jakiś prosty sposób na rozszyfrowanie historii przy przenoszeniu tagów między obiektami), czy źle rozumiem jego znaczenie i tu pasuje.
BartekChom (2025-01-25 11:12:28+00:00): Po przeczytaniu listy na wiki residential=terrace wydaje się oczywiste.
syntex (2025-01-25 15:26:32+00:00): Kiedyś nadużywałem tego tagu i stosowałem residential=apartments dla każdego osiedla mieszkaniowego. Nie używałem innych typów residential=* i to chyba był błąd, postaram się część naprawić.
syntex (2025-01-25 15:27:43+00:00): Nie jestem pewien czy to kwestia uszczegółowienia i zmiany definicji residential=apartments czy też od zawsze ten znacznik oznaczał tylko osiedla mieszkaniowe składające się z bloków mieszkalnych a nie dowolne osiedle mieszkaniowe
BartekChom (2025-01-25 16:46:25+00:00): Bardzo dziękuję za wyjaśnienie.
syntex (2025-07-19 18:33:31+00:00): Naprawiłem błędne residential=apartments w Warszawie które kiedyś nadałem
BartekChom (2025-07-20 04:19:44+00:00): Dziękuję.
Leo Slager (2022-11-21 09:55:30+00:00): Dag OttoR,

In de Nederlandse community is er consensus dat zulke kort durende werkzaamheden niet op de kaart worden opgenomen. De voornaamste reden is dat routers niet elke dag de nieuwste kaartgegevens van OSM overnemen. Soms gebeurt dat maar 1x per week of 1x per maand.
Dat betekent dan dat navigatie apparatuur gedurende een volle maand de weg als niet bruikbaar beschouwd terwijl de werkzaamheden al lang gereed zijn.
Als je die werkzaamheden op de kaart wil zetten dan kan dat met een  conditional.
Voor de H. Cleyndertweg zou dat bijv zijn:
access:conditional=no@(2022 Nov 21 - 2022 Dec 9).
Zie:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
Tenslotte zijn dat soort afsluitingen absoluut terwijl het vaak zo is dat fietsers en voetgangers gewoon kunnen passeren langs de werkzaamheden.
Alleen als de werkzaamheden langer duren (bijv meer dan 6-8 weken) is een highway=construction gepast.
Maar al te vaak gebeurd het dan dat de aconstruction niet tijdig verwijderd wordt met als gevolg dat gebruikers gaan melden dat de kaart niet klopt.
Bij een conditional gaat dat dus automatisch goed.
OttoR (2022-12-11 21:45:14+00:00): Hallo Leo,
Dank voor de verheldering.
Ik heb via Overpass alls het goed is alle wegen 'under construction' even nagelopen en nagenoeg allemaal zijn deze voor langere tijd afgesloten én hebben ze waar ik het kon vinden een ieder geval opening_date en een verwijzing naar de webpagina van de werkzaamheden.

Een aantal constructions die geen verwijzing hadden of opening_date heb ik na onderzoek (website gemeente, gvb etc...) verwijderd.

Ikzelf gebruik OSMAnd veel en die biedt de mogelijkheid om 'live' updates op te halen, dus dan is het wel prettig als je aan het fietsen bent dat de werkzaamheden erin staan. Zal voor kortdurende werkzaamheden de conditional gaan gebruiken. 

Overigens moeten die natuurlijk ook wel weer verwijderd worden indien niet meer van toepassing :-)

Groet,
Otto
Carto'Cité (2022-12-13 12:04:57+00:00): Encore moi 😅
J'ai enlevé le bicycle=designated sur ces chemins :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115791945
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115791943
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115791944
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/145799232
Je pense qu'il n'y a pas d'élément dans ce sens et même des barrières. Tu me diras si tu as observé autre chose.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Nzau (2022-12-13 14:08:27+00:00): Erreur de carto de ma part tu as raison merci !
user_17724595 (2022-11-20 20:32:03+00:00): Changelog:
- Remove nonsense value of gnis:county_id tag.
- Remove redundant node. 
- Add phone and house number from link in source tag.
user_17724595 (2022-11-25 20:15:19+00:00): .
marco406 (2022-11-23 08:21:58+00:00): Cześć, po Twojej edycji zniknęła część dróg w rejonie Dolnośląskiego Centrum Sportu w Jakuszycach. Zamieniłeś linię service na piste:type=nordic. Nie jest to raczej prawidłowe rozwiązanie. Na tych drogach rozgrywane są też konkurencje narciarskie, biegowe i rowerowe.
bxl-forever (2022-11-20 20:55:58+00:00): Hello,

Incomplete/bad tags here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1115795924

Is this a hairdressers shop?
Use shop=hairdresser instead of building=commercial, then.  And the name should not start in lower case.

Happy mapping.
user_6110846 (2023-02-18 14:13:57+00:00):   если б можно бьіло на русский язьік пописать или плкакать я б ето сделал бьі с удовольствием 
русский язьік ето мерзость ето дерьмо ето моча ето хуйня
eggie (2022-11-20 20:33:46+00:00): Dag Luke... In OSM hebben we uitsluitend adresnodes..  Svp geen adressen toevoegen aan de gebouwomtrek.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-20 21:01:31+00:00): Hoi Telekijker. Je vraagt feedback..
Lijkt me geen bos..  Je kunt een  bomenrij intekenen op een lijnelement met natural=tree_row 

Of je kunt losse bomen intekenen.
natural=tree op een node.

Is hier nog steeds een boomgaard?
Of is het wellicht (kwekerij) een plant_nursery
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dplant_nursery

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-11-20 21:46:39+00:00): Even gekeken.. Dat hek is prima..
natural=grassland is eigenlijk gras in natuurgebieden.
Op die kavels is het meestal landuse=grass of meadow.
losse bomen map je op een node maet natural=tree 
Een goede editor is JOSM Een aanrader..

 
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710     

Mapse
eggie
NorthCrab (2022-11-20 22:17:33+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikacje.

Nie zrobiłeś nic źle. Piszę tylko informacyjnie :)

Jeśli widzisz "latające" punkty adresowe nieprzypisane do budynku to staraj się je złączać. W cięższych przypadkach możesz pozostawić bez zmian.

Wtedy, jeśli jakiś punkt usługowy obejmuje cały budynek to dane sklepu przypinaj do budynku. Możesz pozostawić punkt usługowy jako punkt gdy nie jesteś pewien lub gdy w 1 budynku znajduje się więcej niż 1 punkt usługowy.

Dodatkowo, kiedy jakiś punkt ma nazwę, staraj się umieszczać ją w tagu name=, mam na myśli sklepy na ul. rynek grocholski. Jeśli nie mają nazwy lub nazywają się po prostu (sklep spożywczy) to wersja aktualna jest OK.
eggie (2022-11-20 21:03:08+00:00): Hi Luke.. Please use the present addressnode to tag on.

I merged your info with the addressnode.
Greetz,
eggie
FajrAl (2026-06-09 11:27:49+00:00): why there is a road to the sea? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/354481227
abakus_uploader (2022-11-20 23:35:15+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2022-11-21 07:33:16+00:00): Als voorbeeld een paar bomen toegevoegd.
natural=tree
mapse
eggie
Telekijker (2022-11-22 22:54:50+00:00): Maar die optie zie ik in Id niet, of ligt dat aan mijn ogen ? Instelling is ook mogelijk.
eggie (2022-11-23 06:26:53+00:00): Editor iD is beperkt. Kies voor 'Alle tags zichtbaar' .. Dacht na selectie van een geplaatste node.
Dan kun je zelf regels aanvullen. Dacht het plusje.
De key wordt dan natural.. en de value tree 
Dus zelf invoeren. Het zal niet bij de voorkeuzes zitten.
De meeste ervaren mappers gebruiken editor josm.
Die heeft meer mogelijkheden.
Ik typ een t en dan komt het woord tree...
En bij de voorkeuzes zitten ook al die objecten.
Josm aanrader.
starsep (2022-11-21 19:22:32+00:00): Is bicycle allowed on https://osm.org/way/1115816181?
Looks like a normal sidewalk
starsep (2022-11-21 19:24:36+00:00): I changed tagging in https://osm.org/changeset/129209529
motor_vehicle=no and foot=designated are reduntant for highway=footway. I think bicycle=yes is a mistake.
Debjaro (2022-11-21 22:29:51+00:00): If it's redundant it should be coded away. Also, I don't know who is responsible for this but the term highway here is being used too loosely. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/highway

Is a bicycle allowed? Yes, no police officer is going to stop you for biking on the sidewalk in Warsaw. And again, justifying all of these little things takes the joy away from mapping thoroughly. 

You live in Warsaw, I have read your profile. 

 https://osm.org/way/1115816181 is not a sidewalk. It's a footpath, non-adjacent to any roads. It's not a sidewalk.

I have seen the routes this database produces for bikes in Warsaw and they are ridiculous. Please, let the map express the city as at it works.
starsep (2022-11-21 22:40:18+00:00): > Yes, no police officer is going to stop you for biking on the sidewalk in Warsaw
You might be surprised.

bicycle=yes means that it is legal use bicycle here. It is not. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Dyes

I am not a native English speaker, for me it is close to a street and parallel to it, so I used sidewalk. Not really relevant.
starsep (2022-11-21 19:34:17+00:00): I reverted this change. With this tagging such area is not useful, it shouldn't be glued with ways and makes editing more complicated.
Debjaro (2022-11-21 22:17:44+00:00): I am reverting it again. Good mapping takes time and effort. It might not be useful to you, but I believe in the value of thorough mapping. 

Why revert my effort and work? Not the philosophy I adhere to. Improve on my work, don't delete it.
starsep (2022-11-21 19:30:14+00:00): Could you make better changeset comments? It's unclear what you wanted to do. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

It seems that you wanted mark crossing as unmarked. I think previous was correct. footway=crossing does not imply that it is marked. 
crossing key is used on a node where footway crosses highway (street). See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing
Debjaro (2022-11-21 22:11:26+00:00): My comments are concise and correct. Writing more isn't always better.

Also, have you been there or checked on Google maps? Because it is pretty clear that there is no footpath intended. That's why I deleted it. What's there is the remnants of what once was a crossing. And if I have to justify every change I make with an essay, then I will not contribute. I put work into this to make a good map. Not to justify a good map. I am changing it again.

And I don't know who is responsible for the terminology here, but I think a highway should be a highway and a road a road.
starsep (2022-11-21 22:43:13+00:00): You should know that it's forbidden to use Google Maps data. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google

I am using aerial imagery: Geoportal.

Your tagging was simply incorrect, and you made another change which made this feature incorrect, again.

Please read the wiki first.

It is legal to cross here, there is no need for zebra crossing and footway=crossing doesn't mean that.
Debjaro (2022-11-21 22:58:21+00:00): I don't use Google Maps, and I don't use aerial imagery. I am there. It was a question for you, not for me.

How is that change incorrect? There is no zebra markings and there is even a double line between lanes. after a 90º angle at a busy spot.
starsep (2022-11-22 20:07:58+00:00): I have been there but I don't recall all details, I checked aerial imagery. I will check the place tomorrow as I will be nearby.

Previous tagging didn't imply zebra crossing, there is separate tag for that.
You tend to use tags which don't convey clear meaning and your change caused the feature to inconstent set of tags.
It might make sense to remove way here if crossing here is illegal and I don't think it's the case. Leaving it with lit=yes + motor_vehicle=yes + surface=asphalt makes no sense to me.

Usually feature has one main tag such as highway, amenity, leisure, shop... See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features

Some tags are used by many features, some are limited to one or a few. Example: footway tag is used with highway=footway, parking tag is used with amenity=parking, bicycle_parking is used with amenity=bicycle_parking.
Diacritic (2022-11-21 01:45:05+00:00): this edit has made the lane tagging on way 725213920 incorrect. It was already correctly tagged, but you have introduced a right turn lane next to a two lane carriageway.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129172268
Frans S (2022-11-21 14:27:42+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this project.
I am a global validator and review changesets.
Your tagging is incorrect.
Places, like hamlets, isolated dwellings need to be mapped by putting a single node near the object and tag it as place=hamlet or village and so on.
You tagged an area around a hamlet as place=hamlet. This is incorrect.
if you want to map an area, including f.i. a hamlet, you need to tag it as landuse=hamlet.
See this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dhamlet
tagging an area as place=hamlet is not recommended and need to be adjusted.
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129172490
Frans S (2022-11-21 14:35:42+00:00): Hello. See my comment on changeset 129173128
Inaccurate mapped.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129172694
Glassman (2022-11-21 19:35:15+00:00): Descriptive names are not used in OSM. If the name on the stand is Seasonal Berry Stand then it is appropriate otherwise you can add the type of berries they sell using produce=*. I don't usually add opening hours to farm stands but they can be added. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours#Syntax
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129173051
Frans S (2022-11-21 14:34:04+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project.
This changeset is reviewed by a Global Validator, at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
E: Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.
G: The shadow of a building included in your mapping.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.
* Please be sure the object you want to map is a building. When there is no shadow next to it, or traces of human activity, it is mostly not a building.  Buildings have mostly a gray or brown roof. Green means trees or scrub.
* Quality prevails over quantity



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129173128
blef (2022-11-21 16:15:35+00:00): Bonjour,
Je vous confirme que la ligne https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/504851015 a été déposée (ligne + pylônes), du moins sur la partie que j'ai constaté au nord ouest de Saint-Paul-lès-Dax. J'avais laissé une note (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2630893) lors du démontage sans toucher aux données OSM car j'ignorais si la totalité de la liaison était concernée.
fgouget (2022-11-21 18:52:45+00:00): Merci pour l'information.

Sur certaines vues aériennes certains pylônes semblaient effectivement avoir disparus tandis que d'autres étaient toujours présents. Les cables étaient aussi absents sur certaines vues StreetView et je ne crois pas les avoir vus sur la BDOrtho mais ils ne sont pas toujours faciles à voir.

Ce que vous me dites semble confirmer que la ligne a été supprimée mais j'hésite encore à tout enlever dans OSM.
Glassman (2022-11-21 19:40:13+00:00): #TIP: We normally capitalize business names unless they are listed in all lower case.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129173924
OddlyAngled (2022-12-29 19:24:39+00:00): Secor describes Wilts Col as being directly between peak 7 and 8, where Echo Pass (currently) located. do you think Wilts Col and Echo Pass are one and the same?
timfcallahan (2022-12-29 22:00:42+00:00): Hi - this was my source indicating it is the saddle just to the west of the  Echo Peaks. What do you think?

https://www.summitpost.org/echo-ridge/295350
timfcallahan (2022-12-29 22:02:34+00:00): Oops. Meant to the EAST not WEST.
OddlyAngled (2022-12-30 02:16:47+00:00): I double checked in Secor and the UTM location can point to either one but the description makes it sound like the way you have it mapped is correct:

"The south side of the pass consists of slabs that lead to the northern base of Matthes Crest."
tastrax (2022-11-24 04:27:26+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code 
+61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number.
For freecall numbers that work whilst overseas (ie 13 13 13) use +61 XX XX XX
as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
Allison P (2022-11-21 01:29:39+00:00): Detached. Forgot to edit the boilerplate. None of these are mobile homes.
E-A-D-G (2022-11-21 01:09:16+00:00): Curtis Close
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-13 05:59:56+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164880087
Supaplex (2022-11-21 04:34:12+00:00): Could you split the changesets to at least two? And what is the purpose of adding wheelchair=yes on bus stop in Taiwan?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129174917
Helge_Inselmann (2022-11-22 15:24:47+00:00): Hi, this is Helge from the Wheelmap-Team. 

We know that these big changesets are annoying. We really want to optimize this, but unfortunately it takes longer than planned.
The problem is on our to-do list. I ask for a little more patience.

The tag is added to show whether the bus stop is wheelchair accessible  or not.
Stretch Longfellow (2022-11-28 18:47:24+00:00): You need to revert this edit. OSM standards do not allow 2 lane freeways to be marked as motorway. This was correctly labeled previously as a trunk road and expressway.
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-12 21:51:19+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164873712
Fizzie-DWG (2025-04-10 06:25:05+00:00): DWG revert - undiscussed Organised import from unknown source

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/164752626