piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2022-03-30 22:31:09+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
kartler175 (2022-05-13 14:17:22+00:00): Why did you create a new relation for already existing feature https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/157811 ?
JeroenvanderGun (2022-05-13 17:29:09+00:00): The National Park and the Natura2000 bird protection area are not the same.
user_5359 (2022-04-04 06:16:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046594486. What is the menaing of the tag Storey = 5?
avinet_ua (2022-03-30 19:58:51+00:00): поверни назад, ти не розумієш чому так було зроблено чи прикидаєшся?
ivanbranco (2022-05-16 20:11:16+00:00): Hi CHMIV,

in OSM we use ISO codes for languages, so name:prussian should be name:bat (the ISO 639-2 code for prussian since there's no ISO 639-1).

Also I don't see the point to have a name and an old_name with the same value. A name is old or it's not. In this case, since it's prussian, it should be only an old_name, not a name tag.

Do you agree with such edits?
NieWnen (2022-03-31 12:25:56+00:00): Usunąłeś adres przy okazji.
Warto było przenieś go np. na punkt, jeśli nie nadawał się już na obszar.
rszevski (2022-03-31 17:17:01+00:00): Niechcący :) Już dodałem.
eggie (2022-03-31 05:30:42+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SekeRob (2022-04-02 09:08:29+00:00): Hi

I've fixed this building in your edit set https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574979694 (you were the last to touch this. Suffered the sum of nonsense. It's 3 parts, the long section (probably) garage boxes. While there added street relation and other bits. See CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119227524 for additions/changes.

ciao
muchichka_s (2022-03-30 19:38:48+00:00): Інформація про пункти пропуску дуже важлива для українських біженців і повинна за можливості залишатися на карті. Наразі вона присутня на сайті державної прикордонної служби
wireguy (2022-03-31 11:00:46+00:00): hi mmdude
i corrected the unclosed relation, squared and added a few buildings.  Pressing the 'Q' key when you have a building selected will square up the corners for you.    Also 'shudder' doesn't describe what the change is about, keep mapping!, and see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
GeoBoris (2022-03-31 07:42:51+00:00): Hier passen z.B. die Positionen im Luftbild nicht mit der Realität zusammen. Bitte mal mit dem lagegenauen Katasterplan vergleichen.
ovruni (2022-03-30 20:39:57+00:00): Hola Ester02, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en sus conjuntos de cambios no se han agregado comentarios que permitan que otros miembros puedan entender los cambios realizados. Por favor revise la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
johnarupire (2022-04-11 01:00:13+00:00): Hola Ester02, la vía mapeada como carretera parece no ser visible en la imagen. ¿Usaste alguna imagen en particular? 
Por otro lado, es necesario que se agreguen comentarios en las ediciones como ha señalado más arriba Ovruni.
Saludos.
bananabananasplit (2022-05-29 13:17:27+00:00): modification network ligne 960 pas bon : "network=liO" avant modif ete ok,  a voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hautes-Pyr%C3%A9n%C3%A9es/Transports_en_commun#liO_R%C3%A9seau_R%C3%A9gional
user_5359 (2022-04-04 06:22:07+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2414207348. What is the meaning of the tag well_number = 113? Did you mean ref (reference number)?

By the way: I can't find the number 113 on the page given under URL.
user_5359 (2022-04-04 06:22:23+00:00): And welcome to OSM!
Shabadabadoo (2022-04-04 18:15:36+00:00): @user_5359 if I enter an address near there, it brings me to a page with the wells feeding that property. Along with those wells, it provides a map of the wells in Madison (link below). The map shows the the tower as Booster Facility #113. https://www.cityofmadison.com/sites/default/files/city-of-madison/water/documents/MadisonWaterUtilityActiveFacilities.pdf
ivanbranco (2022-03-31 18:16:46+00:00): Ciao Martino,

qual è la differenza con place=civil_parish? Se hanno lo stesso significato io userei =civil_parish (172 usi) invece di questo (7 usi).
user_10901495 (2022-03-31 19:51:55+00:00): Ciao Ivan,
la differenza è che le parrocchie civili sono un organo esistente solo in alcuni paesi, come l'Inghilterra o il Portogallo, che rappresenta una divisione amministrativa ispirata dalla divisione ecclesiastica, mentre nel caso dell'Italia esistono solo le semplici parrocchie come divisione territoriale ecclesiastica.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil parish
user_10901495 (2022-03-31 19:52:28+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/Civil_parish
user_10901495 (2022-03-31 19:53:46+00:00): Uffa continuo a sbagliare a scrivere questo link :/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_parish
ppnplus (2023-06-24 02:37:33+00:00): ชื่อถนนบางส่วนที่ท่านเพิ่มได้ถูกย้อนกลับแล้ว เนื่องจากพบว่าท่านใส่ชื่อถนนซ้ำซาก (ที่ไม่ตรงกับถนนสายที่ท่านได้เพิ่ม) หรือใช้ชื่อถนนเป็นตัวระบุที่อยู่/ตำบล/อำเภอ

กรุณาใส่ชื่อถนนที่พบเห็นจากการสำรวจเท่านั้น (ใช้ชื่อและการสะกดตามป้ายทางการได้จะยิ่งดี) หลีกเลี่ยงการใส่ชื่อซ้ำซาก ซึ่งรวมถึงการใช้ชื่อถนนเป็นตัวระบุที่อยู่ หมู่บ้าน ตำบล ด้วยนะครับ

ท่านสามารถสร้างหมายเหตุแล้วใส่ชื่อหมู่บ้านหรือข้อมูลอื่น ๆ ที่ต้องการให้เราเพิ่มได้ อาสาสมัครที่ดูแลแผนที่จะมาตรวจสอบและเพิ่มข้อมูลให้ตามความเหมาะสมครับ ขอบคุณ และขออภัยในความไม่สะดวกด้วยนะครับ

อาสาสมัครดูแลแผนที่

(English)
Some of your road name additions have been reverted. Please only add details from what you see while surveying, and avoid adding duplicate names or adding road names as merely address markers.

To add names of residential areas or add other areas/places you're unsure with, you can create a note, and map volunteers can help you add them onto the map. Thank you, and apologies for inconvenience.
ovruni (2022-03-30 20:59:53+00:00): Hola, he notado que en varios de sus conjuntos de cambios nuevamente se han retirado etiquetas de uso de suelo sin motivo aparente (sus conjuntos de cambios solo indican "nuevas actualizaciones"), por lo que restaurado varias de estas vías. Si tiene alguna duda sobre el mapeo de OSM en Perú, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
Znaika (2022-03-31 07:30:30+00:00): Hallo. Warum machst es so mit dem Spielplatz un Spielgeräten? Ich habe es zurück geändert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119145638
SuperMarkus (2022-03-31 19:02:30+00:00): Sind die Grenzen des Spielplatzes vor Ort genau so markiert? Für mich sieht das alles wie eine Stück vom Strand aus, der einfach ein paar Geräte drauf hat. "Map what's on the ground" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ground_truth und die geographische Realität scheint mir zu sein, dass das da Sand mit ein paar Spielgeräten ist und die Spielplatzgrenzen einst willkürlich in OSM gesetzt wurden.
Znaika (2022-04-01 09:35:16+00:00): Spielplatzgrenzen einst willkürlich in OSM gesetzt wurden??? Kann nicht zustimmen. Es ist ein Spielplatz mit Oberfläche als Sand und grenzt an einem Strand an. Und wenn man nach einem Spielplatz in der Nähe sucht,  dann findet man es, aber nur wenn es so gemappt ist
SuperMarkus (2022-04-02 19:45:11+00:00): Ich verstehe dein Problem nicht. leisure-Tags können laut OSM-Doku auch für problemlos für Punkte gesetzt werden und daher kann das auch mit "meiner" Variante problemlos gefunden werden. Wenn du einen Beleg für genau diese Grenzen hast, dann bitte ich um Entschuldigung, aber dass ich die Bodebbeschaffenheit mappe, ist absolut im Rahmen der OSM-Mission.
o_andras (2022-03-30 22:47:51+00:00): Aparentemente alguem se queixou disto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3112480
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-01 18:51:57+00:00): I think what you're looking for is https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dcanoe
krusefahrer (2022-03-30 21:13:10+00:00): Sind die neuen Gebäude überwiegend Garagen?
Paramida (2022-04-01 20:26:09+00:00): Hallo, es wurden keine neuen Adressen/Häuser hinzugefügt. Bei  den Gebäuden handelt es sich lediglich um Garagen/Nebengebäude etc. Diese wurden der Vollständigkeit halber ergänzt. Außerdem wurden Versatz und Gebäudeumrisse korrigiert.
eggie (2022-03-31 08:05:40+00:00): Mooi.. weer een fietspad open.
bicycle= yes hoeft niet op fietspaden. .. foot=yes is ook default.
Gr eggie
user_5359 (2022-03-31 05:16:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please.
adas (2022-07-28 10:30:25+00:00): Hej, nie jestem pewien, że ta trasa w parku na Glinki-Rupienica była prawdziwą trasą wyścigową. To po prostu betonowa alejka z ławeczkami. Coś bardziej jak deptak niż tor wyścigowy rolkowy.
cytryn (2022-07-30 19:02:23+00:00): Cześć,
Otagowałem tak sugerując się nazwą opisową "Trasa dla rolkarzy", która była wcześniej nadana temu obiektowi, a którą chciałem zastąpić równoważnym zestawem tagów - wskazywała na to, że to jest właśnie taki dedykowany tor. Ale według tego co piszesz, to może bardziej odpowiednie byłoby jednak highway=footway + inline_skates=yes?
user_5359 (2022-03-31 07:33:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/711159020/history,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688038279,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688037825.
All tree building are on the same time a fence and a tree. The first named building has also a typo which I can't repair: What is the meaning of the tag "+" = "5"?
GerdP (2023-01-11 20:01:00+00:00): Moin!
Ich wundere mich gerade, ob z.B. diese Straße https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23408773 mit dem Rad in beiden Richtungen befahren werden darf oder nicht. Falls ja, fehlt ein oneway:bicycle=no. Laut gpx Datei verläuft dort die Radroute Stadt-Land-Moorgeeflüster.
FraukeLeo (2022-04-10 06:12:11+00:00): Hallo 351293, du hast die Einmündung der Leipziger Straße nach veralteten Luftbildern auf einen alten Stand zurückgesetzt. Diese ausufernde Kreuzung wurde vor zwei Jahren auf eine viel kleinere Fläche umgebaut und war vor deinem Edit auf dem aktuellen Stand. Machst du das bitte wieder rückgängig?
FraukeLeo (2022-04-10 08:43:58+00:00): Ergänzung: Google hat einigermaßen den aktuellen Stand (die B 455 wurde auch noch verschwenkt), aber von Google dürfen wir natürlich nicht abmalen. Ich hab das letztes Jahr mit GPS-Befahrungen erfasst und danach gemappt.
351293 (2022-04-10 09:22:47+00:00): Oh! Das tut mir Leid. Ich hatte extra unterschiedliche Sat-Bilder miteinander verglichen... Habe ich jetzt Rückgängig gemacht.
FraukeLeo (2022-04-10 10:59:49+00:00): Danke! Tipp: Wenn das Mapping vom Luftbild stark abweicht, in die History eines beteiligten Objekts schauen. Wenn das 12 Jahre keiner angefasst hat, einfach ändern, aber wenns noch "neu" ist, nachfragen. Das hätte dich schnell auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/103140124 gebracht und meine Zusammenfassung hätte dir alles gesagt :)
Jakka (2022-04-01 07:36:41+00:00): eens kijken in edit mode, deze landuse maakt een rare knip
Oon de parking teken je over een gebouw ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.26744007938976/4.868280021574112
◪ Jarv (2022-03-30 21:33:32+00:00): Didn't change cs description.
Just adjusted the ramp between the cycleway and road from works that took place this week
bxl-forever (2022-04-01 09:24:22+00:00): Hello,

Your house looks a bit distorted now. ;-(
We advise to not use aerial imagery to draw houses.  If you do that, you are drawing the roof and not the walls.

Here is the recommended way to do it: when you are editing, use the "Background Settings" button on the right and scroll down to "AIV Flanders GRB".  Use that layer for buildings.

Have a nice day.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-01 18:45:47+00:00): OSM is not for testing
MrSledge (2022-08-08 21:44:57+00:00): Hi, what is the name of this element?
Thank you!
MrSledge (2022-08-09 11:55:36+00:00): I take it is just Getavan, I'll add it then.
user_8101879 (2022-08-09 15:22:37+00:00): Great !

Best regards
MrSledge (2022-08-09 22:52:40+00:00): Best regards
unen (2022-04-15 08:38:43+00:00): Merhaba Kardelen. Mapathondaki tasklarda sizden istenen, binalar ve kendinizi yetkin hissederseniz yollardı. Arazi kullanımı daha ileri tecrübe ve OSM verisi konusunda bilgi gerektiren bir konu ve bu şekilde veri üretimi yapmanız genel veri kalitesini olumsuz yönde etkileyen şeyler. Görevlerde sizden istenen düzenlemelerin dışına çıkmamaı, bu tür daha yüksek seviye düzenlemeler yapmak istiyorsan da benimle iletişime geçmeni öneririm.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119134068
ovruni (2022-03-30 22:51:30+00:00): Hola Gerardo, la linea que menciona es parte de la frontera del distrito, voy a revertir este conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
GerardoMalasquez (2022-03-31 19:20:58+00:00): Bien, disculpe el cambio. La próxima vez comentaré mis dudas de forma anticipada a alguna modificación. 
Saludos cordiales
Allison P (2022-03-30 23:47:20+00:00): What is the purpose of splitting the highway up into such short segments?
o_andras (2022-03-30 22:56:01+00:00): Moved closer to the road, but the real position should be checked by someone on the ground.
maplovr (2022-04-14 01:46:35+00:00): The Mountain Trails Foundations map is not in the public domain. Please revert all information stolen from there map.
tcarlisle (2022-04-14 16:09:50+00:00): If I've made a mistake I'm happy to correct it.  I wasn't aware that I could not cite MountainTrails as a source.  I used imagery and heatmaps to map the routes.  And referred to MountainTrails only to add the xc ski grooming status.  

I see that you (or someone else) has deleted the trails (some of which were already present before my update and a did not need to be removed).  I would like to re-add them but I would like to do it in an appropriate way.  

There are other sources I can use to add the trails and routes, but I want to be careful to avoid problems and accusations.  I would appreciate it if you would provided explanation and assitance to help me understand what sources to avoid so I can learn,  rather than lobbing an accusation at me.

Thanks.
tcarlisle (2022-04-14 16:35:09+00:00): Just to be clear, I mean no offense.  I'm happy to correct my mistake and work to prevent such mistakes in the future.  Any insight you have into how to better identify sources that I should avoid I would appreciate.  I thought I got this one correct but clearly I didn't so I would appreciate opening a dialog so I could learn from you.  Thanks.
maplovr (2022-04-14 21:04:58+00:00): The primary problem is apps like AllTrails that use the data in an unresponsible way. In addition to not hiding illegal trails, they direct people to the most "popular trail" in any area. Bonanza Flats gets so inundated with AllTrails idiots that they congest the trails and trailhead parking, even blocking the road making it completely impassable. With 350+ miles of singletrack in Park City, everyone uses the same trail. This also erodes the trails. I work directly with trail associations and they all say the same thing: AllTrails is destroying the best trails. Bonanza Flats is one of the more sensitive areas, and if people are going to put trail data there, they should go up there themselves and determine what the trail names are, difficulty level, etc. Or talk with the trail association/land owner.  Using satelite or a heatmap alone does not tell you what trails are illegal. 

All that I would ask, is that you follow the OSM mantra "Don't Copy other Maps". I also provide my survey work to companies that are here in Utah like AltaPlanning, Trailforks, and others. Please stop copying them as well. You have added trail names that are only found on some of those sources.
seattlefyi (2022-03-31 01:25:29+00:00): Hi, thanks for the update! Guessing that just the business tags could be removed, and the address tags could remain for the next tenant? If so, I can put it back that way. Thanks again.
Frans S (2022-04-06 14:55:53+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular.
Wrongly positioned mappings should be adjusted to their footprint.





Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119135724
mariotomo (2022-03-31 23:27:00+00:00): hi, first of all, welcome to OSM. as reaction to your "review_requested", in OSM we should avoid using descriptive names, but instead we should find the best tag and value for that meaning. for example: 'name=Bathroom', should be 'amenity=toilets'. the reason behind this is standardization, avoid language and spelling dependencies, and also the fact that in occasions, amenities may be inside a specific building that does have its individual name.  maybe not the case here, but just imagine that the buildings in this park are named.  hope you get the point.  be welcome to ask further.
https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
mariotomo (2022-03-31 23:27:52+00:00): a relevant link:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets
mariotomo (2022-04-02 14:31:12+00:00): hi again. I changed the value for your 'name=Bohio' building to 'palafitte', which was not a correct action either. can you come back here, and fix it to either 'hut' or 'stilt_house'? thank you!
Your Village Maps (2023-10-29 21:03:00+00:00): I noticed that the Gaylord Rockies hotel building relation no longer renders in OSM, and I don't know why that is. Relation: 13056728
ovruni (2022-03-31 00:42:53+00:00): Hola Felix Josue, gracias por contribuir a OSM. He notado que en sus conjuntos de cambios no se han agregado comentarios que permitan que otros miembros puedan entender los cambios realizados. Por favor revise la documentación sobre buenos comentarios en conjuntos de cambios. [0]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Good_changeset_comments
literan (2022-03-31 20:42:07+00:00): прекратите спамить
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-05 20:11:34+00:00): Different golf features like fairways, sand traps and greens should have matching tags and should not have a name tag. For more details see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
MxxCon (2022-03-31 02:59:19+00:00): Thank you for fixing the shape. :) 👍
What about the construction site polygon around it? I imagine since this building is complete and occupied it shouldn't be inside of the construction site?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119137062
VicMapAround (2022-04-01 03:00:46+00:00): I updated the construction site and parking lot around the apartment
nevw (2022-03-31 04:03:19+00:00): How did you manage to create two businesses with the same name and street number but placed in two different locations on Newcastle Street in Perth?
Please decide if either is placed correctly and operate your business from there.
nevw (2022-04-05 05:49:26+00:00): no response, deleted both entries as unable to clarify or verify. Maybe these two locations were examples of their pool fencing?
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-04-02 12:57:42+00:00): Please, do not add advertisement text in description field
user_15449521 (2022-04-03 13:46:34+00:00): That is a wikipeida description that I found!
Allison P (2022-04-04 14:39:36+00:00): That is not a good justification. That text wouldn't belong on Wikipedia either. Also, the store is called Kroger, the address number is 1524, and the street is Highway 16 West. addr:state also uses the two letter postal abbreviation.
user_15449521 (2022-04-04 14:45:02+00:00): I just wanted that on Qwant maps!

You may want to sign up here:
https://www.skillsyouneed.com/ips/politeness.html
Allison P (2022-04-04 15:08:06+00:00): Linking someone to tips on politeness is far more condescending than tersely explaining how to add features to OpenStreetMap. Perhaps a counselor who can help you through feeling insulted when being corrected in the most neutral way possible is in order?

See how that feels?
user_15449521 (2022-04-04 15:59:35+00:00): That's right!
Cry to jesus!
b-jazz (2022-04-02 17:34:56+00:00): Hello Dante,

You might want to check out the following link before drawing more sand traps with inner grass:

https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/#drawing-multipolygons

You should be drawing the entire outer ring and tagging it with sand trap and then drawing each inner grass ring (tagging as rough if appropriate), and then selecting all of them and "combining" them into what is known as a multipolygon.

Hope this helps. Let me know if you have any further questions.

Happy mapping.
b-jazz (2022-04-02 18:05:38+00:00): Also, fairways should be drawn as a single polygon, not breaking them up into many adjoining polygons. Thanks.
pkoby (2022-04-01 13:04:16+00:00): I would argue about this being religious landuse. I'm seeing a retirement home and a school. Though they're Catholic-run, I wouldn't understand them to be doing religious activity like I would say of a church or similar.
ElliottPlack (2022-04-01 15:04:39+00:00): Peter, you are right, I think this does not meet the definition of religious landuse. I did not check the wiki first. Would it be better as commercial, or something else?
puma515 (2022-03-31 02:01:11+00:00): Where this was not suitable, it was changed to natural=scrub or barrier=hedge
puma515 (2022-03-31 02:03:46+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dhedge
JassKurn (2022-04-01 13:32:00+00:00): Concerned with this change, and with the creation of the wiki page and use of hedge_bank. "Hedgebank" is a an British English term referring to a type hedge built on top of bank of earth/ruble, commonly found in the southwest of England.  

Strongly agree with need to create a tagging structure/method to separate "garden/small hedges" and large field hedges, and "hedge bank" but believe the solution needs to be discussed first.
JassKurn (2022-04-01 14:00:28+00:00): Just to clarify... I don't mean tag hedge_bank should be used in England. I would argue that hedge_bank is a necessary tag, but definition needs discussion, and I'd argue it can be a sub tag for "garden hedges" and "field boundary" hedges. The separation of the two hedge types should not be based around hedgebank.