piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
laznik (2021-10-22 07:17:57+00:00): Hi kimambogh. The buildings in this changeset are not rectangular, even though the source aerial imagery suggests that they should be. When drawing rectangular buildings, please use the JOSM building tool. Optionally you can make any polygon rectangular by selecting it and hitting the key "q" on the keyboard.
See this page for more info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools
aceman444 (2022-07-14 23:31:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/222514054 teda building=office nie je.
Dodko (2022-07-15 10:46:59+00:00): Vďaka za upozornenie, v registri adries bol uvedený druh stavby "Administratívna budova" opravili to na "Iná budova".
aceman444 (2022-07-15 12:00:47+00:00): Dakujem
aceman444 (2025-02-01 18:25:58+00:00): Aj napriklad https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75219850 nie je building=garage podla definicie v OSM, mozno tak building=garages. Chapem, ze to mozno register nerozlisuje. Ale bude treba s tym nejako nalozit a nie to teda naslepo importovat do OSM, tak ako mnohe ine typy budov, co sme uz identifikovali ako problemove.
AmateurPlanner (2021-10-21 19:25:01+00:00): Moved the node as well as the original unit has been subdivided and the Presotea is taking the northern portion
Noen (2021-10-21 19:29:20+00:00): Se for øvrig https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Street_area hvis du ønsker å kartlegge veier som områder.
emarv (2022-01-03 11:05:41+00:00): Część. Mam pytanie odnośnie szlaku https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3705949 W stosunku do oficjlnej mapy PTTK https://podkarpacie.szlaki.pttk.pl/23-gory-bez-granic-nowa-sarzyna-maria-magdalena w Nowej Sarzynie inaczej przebiega szlak. Tzn. w OSM prowadzi do stacji Nowa Sarzyna, natomiast na stronie PTTK prowadzi do Nowa Sarzyna Kolonia. Z czego wynika różnica? Inaczej szlak jest oznaczony w terenie?
mirekm61 (2022-01-03 16:43:04+00:00): Cześć.
Od kilku lat stacja Nowa Sarzyna Kolonia  to w zasadzie ruina.
Już kilka lat temu przebieg został zmieniony i przeznakowany do stacji Nowa Sarzyna.  Ja w 2021 roku osobiście odnawiałem oznakowanie szlaku zielonego i to co jest obecnie na OSM ukazuje rzeczywisty przebieg szlaku.
emarv (2022-01-04 06:24:55+00:00): Bardzo dziękuję. Pozdrawiam.
stev (2021-10-21 22:35:14+00:00): Please use the address tags as previously advised - e.g. addr:housenumber=* addr:housename=*. "99" is not a name
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112807209
Glassman (2021-10-24 20:52:30+00:00): Thank you for your edit. I reviewed your work and it looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112807226
Glassman (2021-10-24 21:03:18+00:00): #TIP: add a tag to classify the type of business. This is a strange case. Maybe amenity=event_venue?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112807405
Dodko (2022-09-15 10:10:26+00:00): Neviem aký zmysel malo vymazať názov ulice Orechová
https://zbgis.skgeodesy.sk/mkzbgis/sk/zakladna-mapa/detail/ra_adresne_body/0/14363378?pos=48.272889,17.305526,19
AintheKitchen (2022-09-16 07:19:40+00:00): ospravedlnujem sa asi omyl som mimo komp ak to vies fixnut. dakujem
Dodko (2022-09-16 07:27:12+00:00): Názov som pridal, boli tam poznámky tak som si to všimol.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3359267
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3359662
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3359663
jeslop (2021-10-21 20:52:32+00:00): Hola martincampello. Gracias por unirte a OSM y por tu colaboración.

Para empezar a mapear estaría bien que visitaras, entre otras páginas, 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenas_prácticas_en_España
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Convenciones_y_estándares_de_edición
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:leisure%3Dpark

Algunos de tus primeros errores ya han sido corregidos por otros usuarios. Aquí por ejemplo has utilizado un nombre descriptivo, algo desaconsejado.

Ánimo y bienvenido.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
nmombo12 (2021-10-21 23:55:01+00:00): Action taken by DWG https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5398
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112808368
eggie (2022-12-06 14:45:57+00:00): Dit is wat je doet... Maar waarom?
eggie (2022-12-06 14:46:01+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112808589
eggie (2022-12-06 14:47:39+00:00): bollard hersteld
muralito (2021-10-23 16:18:37+00:00): Hi. The port was already mapped in https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2747806
literan (2021-10-22 16:37:24+00:00): это не названия
Travieso (2021-10-26 13:31:22+00:00): Когда на киоске по продаже прессы написано "Пресса", то это всё-таки название
literan (2021-10-26 14:15:59+00:00): нет, для OSM это не название 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE

название указывается на табличке у входа в магазин (в случае киоска - рядом с окошком), или на доске информации внутри. Большинство типовых киосков в Москве сейчас названия вовсе не имеют.
Travieso (2021-10-26 14:32:49+00:00): Я правильно понимаю, что если на киоске написано Касса, Пресса, Табак, Мороженое, Билеты и т.д. и всё, то ничего указывать не надо? Просто на табличке внутри часто указывается юридическая информация типа ООО такой-то.
literan (2021-10-26 20:18:06+00:00): можно все же подойти и посмотреть на табличке, бывает что на вывеске "Табак", а на табличке - "Магазин табачных изделий "Ирина". Но вообще в стриткомплите есть вариант "Нет названия", он тогда ставит noname=yes и квест убирается.

А ООО или АО или ИП, это уже другой тег, operator. Туда записывается юр/физлицо, управляющее магазином/рестораном/кафе... Но его только через десктоп-редактор
Ser9ei (2021-10-23 15:01:15+00:00): name=Продуктовый магазин - это ошибка. Используйте тег shop=convenience
Тег name=* используется только для наименований (имён собственных), а не для описаний, категорий и т.п.

Присоединяйтесь к сообществу в телеграм @ruosm и задавайте любые вопросы по редактированию карты. Лучше лишний раз спросить, чем потом исправлять ошибки.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112808859
Sheila Job (2021-10-29 07:02:10+00:00): Hello kimambogh, you have some unsquared buildings here, to square the building you have to: after draw a building select it and press "q" on your keyboard...

Thanks for mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112808883
Frans S (2021-12-30 13:53:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).
E: Rectangular Buildings not always squared. They are mostly strickt rectangular.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112808960
gabro00 (2021-10-23 08:48:50+00:00): Szia!
A települések rangjára is rá tudnál nézni? Arra gondolok, hogy megfelel-e a KSH szerinti besorolásának az OSM-en lévő címke pl. város, falu stb.
Kádár Iván (2021-10-23 14:07:30+00:00): Szia!
A magyar közigazgatási besorolást be tudom tenni a place:hu címkébe. A place címke besorolásáról viszont nem egyezik a magyar és az angol OSM wiki. Ezt bedobom a levlistára.
gabro00 (2021-10-23 14:51:42+00:00): A place wiki magyar fordításában megpróbálják összeegyeztetni a lakosságszámmal: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hu:Key:place

Egyébként Röszkénél futottam bele, hogy valaki átírta városra, rövid ideig úgy volt, aztán visszaírták falura: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/291986261/history
Az ilyen esetekre gondoltam, hogy jó lenne átfésülni az összes települést hátha valaki átírt a puszta közepén egyet, ami azóta is úgy van, tévesen.
Kádár Iván (2021-10-23 15:40:06+00:00): ellenőriztem, most a magyar közigazgatási beosztás szerint van minden place címke kitöltve:
https://groups.google.com/g/openstreetmap-hungary/c/xHgAScH7RxY
gabro00 (2021-10-24 16:54:29+00:00): Köszi a frissítést (már majdnem magam csináltam meg) és a bejegyzést is!
Úgy látom érdemes volt felvetni, mert tényleg problémás a dolog. Bízom benne az egész rendeződésével valaki a wikit is aktualizálja, hogy aki majd legközelebb frissíti az adatokat, annak útmutatást nyújthasson és ne kelljen előzetesen áttárgyalni mi, hogy, merre.
Glassman (2021-10-24 21:04:47+00:00): #TIP: We don't typically add the name of the property unless it is signed. I'd suggest removing the Thurston County Schools property name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112809384
Kerkiq (2021-10-21 22:44:43+00:00): lift gate это должна быть точка, а не линия.
literan (2021-10-22 16:33:40+00:00): удалил лишние теги
maraf24 (2021-10-22 06:40:21+00:00): Liczne duplikaty, wycofałem.
maraf24 (2021-10-22 06:39:01+00:00): Należało przy edycji odznaczyć, że to nie jest budynek.
Kerkiq (2021-10-21 22:41:04+00:00): 1.Весь лес за забором? Вряд ли. Надо выбрать только определённый участок леса.
2.если там тропа, то лучше указывать не footpath, a просто path
JJIglesias (2021-10-21 20:58:44+00:00): Esa calle esta mal denotada se llama Adam Gutierrez, no se quien la cambio a Antonio Vaca Diez pero NO es ese su nombre correcto
MundoMaps (2021-10-22 21:24:00+00:00): ¡Hola JJIglesias! Gracias por contactarme. Actualicé el nombre de las calles gracias a la aportación de un usuario del Mapa.
Frans S (2021-12-13 14:18:04+00:00): Hello.  I reviewed your mapping here.
What made you map a whole task as 1 building ? I removed it.
Hola.  He revisado tu mapeo aquí.
¿Qué te hizo mapear toda una tarea como 1 edificio? Lo he eliminado.
scotteaton92 (2023-09-18 15:47:40+00:00): Why did you undo the changes I had made to the New Road/Old Alfred Road/Alfred Road intersection? The ESRI Claraity imagery that you used is much older than the ESRI world imagery used in my changeset. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104461701#map=13/43.4703/-70.6009
scotteaton92 (2023-09-18 15:50:20+00:00): I just fixed it again. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141431235
Lee Carré (2021-10-21 21:26:33+00:00): “in phillipines. philipines is an unmapped area, please map.”

Changeset comments aren't the place to advertise or recruit.

Please limit your changeset bounding boxes to the area in question: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Lee Carré (2021-10-21 21:27:22+00:00): Also, what makes for http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-10-22 04:04:25+00:00): This comment is much better than many others.

Thank you Jakub_sz for your contribution! :-)
Lee Carré (2021-10-22 11:12:59+00:00): “This comment is much better than many others.”

To an extent. It's not terrible, but it's also incomplete / misleading (since more than just buildings were added, and in more places than just the Philippines).
Ser9ei (2021-10-23 14:57:22+00:00): Двигая объекты, настройте сначала смещение снимка. В этом пакете вы не уточнили положение объектов, а сдвинули их зачем-то.

Просто удалили landuse=retail c территории ТК. Опять же, зачем?
Frans S (2021-12-13 12:34:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.
D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112810642
Frans S (2021-12-15 11:38:27+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.
B: overlapping buildings drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112811218
maraf24 (2021-10-22 06:32:43+00:00): "poprawiający będzie miał co robić"
Dlatego sugeruję mapować prawidłowo, bo nikomu się nie chce po kimś poprawiać.
Na początek nie używaj opisów jako nazw.
maraf24 (2021-10-22 06:33:57+00:00): Drugie: nie oznaczaj nielegalnych przejść jako przejść przez tory.
literan (2021-10-22 16:24:42+00:00): @Продукты Табак@ это не название, а текст с вывески
martianfreeloader (2022-02-11 20:53:28+00:00): "definitiv" würde ich nicht sagen. Es ist schon ein Grenzfall.

Ein sportlicher Mensch auf einem Fixie hat hier keine Probleme, 
aber ein normal-fitter Mensch auf einer langen Tour mit zwei oder vier Satteltaschen hat schon ganz schön zu kämpfen und eine Oma mit E-Bike, die mit OSM-Daten ihre Route plant, wird hier eine böse Überraschung erleben.
martianfreeloader (2025-07-31 10:15:37+00:00): Ich habe incline=100% hinzugefügt.
maraf24 (2021-10-22 06:45:06+00:00): Znikające budynki, węzeł osiedla przeniosiony na węzeł budynku szkoły-po co?
SP6ZOLW-7 (2021-10-23 20:33:54+00:00): znikające budynki to hyba mis klick  na budynku szkoły jedynie dodałem że jedna jego dobuduwka jest stacją trafo
maraf24 (2021-10-23 22:04:47+00:00): Znikające budynki to efekt nieznajomości edytora i braku uważnego czytania, co on pokazuje. A edytor, które używasz, ma kilka pułapek zastawionych na początkujących...
Frans S (2021-12-11 09:39:22+00:00): Hola.  Usted ha nombrado a más de 600 casas 'Siemprejuntos' en todo este proyecto.
En los proyectos HOTOSM sólo es necesario etiquetar un edificio si
edificio=sí
Los he eliminado.
Saludos cordiales
kmpoppe (2021-10-27 18:55:00+00:00): Hi Saulopm!

You have added 10 nodes in 2a Calle and mapped them as natural=wood, which normally is supposed to be an area of a non-maintained woodland.

Did you by any chance mean natural=tree because you wanted to map single trees?

I came across your data because you added an invalid number to the "mapillary" key (1 is not a valid street-level photo, the ID values are almost always higher than 1000000). I'd need to remove these within the coming weeks because of a planned automated edit for the mapillary value world-wide.

Thank you for getting back to me.

Kai
JeroenvanderGun (2021-10-21 22:03:58+00:00): Like other signatories of the Antarctic Treaty, the British government legally cannot do anything that supports its territorial claim and hence justifies tagging with boundary=administrative. All other Antarctic territorial claims are also tagged as non-administrative regions.
Frans S (2021-12-11 09:16:35+00:00): suprimir los nombres de los edificios
4004 (2021-10-24 23:09:44+00:00): hi, thanks for the edit! I believe these foot tags may be redundant, as that's already implied with living_street=yes
berms (2021-10-26 16:16:11+00:00): Hi 4004, thanks for the feedback. I removed the redundant foot tag from the ways.
4004 (2021-10-26 16:45:25+00:00): thanks! no real need to remove once you've added them, but I guess it might be slightly easier to maintain
Tomas Straupis (2021-10-22 05:23:22+00:00): Kanalų Lietuvoje beveik nėra (Vilhelmo), čia yra grioviai (ditch). Pelkėms naudojam tik swamp (apaugę medžiais) ir marsh (be medžių).
Frans S (2021-12-16 13:55:30+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not always accurate mapped and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
you mapped far oversized and included more buildings in 1 mapping.
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.
C: multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.
E: Rectangular Buildings not squared.
H: Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.
Tagging of buildings.  Tag just building=yes



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112812902
Frans S (2021-12-16 14:03:56+00:00): Please take a look to this page where you can see how your mappings should be. I corrected them to the corrected traces
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=115011450
see the legend for more info
Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112812902
skquinn (2021-10-30 05:17:46+00:00): Could you please use your changeset comments to describe what kinds of errors you are fixing and what kinds of changes you are making? Honestly, this particular changeset comment may as well have been blank.
jcarlson (2021-10-22 14:36:52+00:00): Looks great! Thanks for adding this kind of local knowledge to the map!
Just a heads up, though: you (probably unintentionally) edited a boundary feature. In iD, you can go into the settings and turn those features off to avoid accidentally snapping to / moving them.
MineBloxKy (2021-10-25 19:33:07+00:00): Thanks for telling me! I will do this in the future!
wireguy (2022-03-07 13:32:57+00:00): Poundmaker 114-2b relation is broken 
relation 13353159
SomeoneElse (2021-10-22 13:03:19+00:00): ("Macmillan Way", obviously)
Frans S (2021-12-11 09:38:47+00:00): Hola.  Usted ha nombrado a más de 300 casas 'Vivienda' en todo este proyecto.
En los proyectos HOTOSM sólo es necesario etiquetar un edificio si
edificio=sí
Los he eliminado.
Saludos cordiales
Ser9ei (2021-10-23 14:49:28+00:00): Зачем вы убрали building=yes со здания? Это не исправление, а наоборот.
eggie (2021-10-22 07:12:57+00:00): Hi plitvicer.. You are asking for feedback. 
Good job. 
It looks okay to me this way.
crossing=zebra is duplicated tagging
crossing_ref=zebra will do. 
Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112813980
Greetz,
eggie
GoatoftheNorth (2021-10-22 00:17:09+00:00): Mapillary images here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-25.411461111111&lng=-49.254472222222&z=17&pKey=463916628242767&focus=photo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112814265
PT-53 (2021-10-22 06:51:52+00:00): Hallo Calmato1625,
Deine Änderungen an diesen Verkehrsinseln
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/940181042/history
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/940181043/history
ist falsch.
Eine Verkehrsinsel (traffic_calming=island) wird korrent nicht als Fläche sondern - nur - als Merkmal auf dem entspr. Straßenabschnitt eingezeichnet.
Siehe Wiki, Abschnitt "Wie kartieren":
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic%20calming=island?uselang=de

Für die Fläche der Verkehrsinsel könnte man lancover=* verwenden.

Diese Haltestellen-Zufahrt
- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995429838/history
sollte mit service anstelle residential ausgezeichnet werden.

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
skyper (2021-10-22 11:09:26+00:00): Hallo auch von mir.
Zusätzlich hast Du diesen Knoten (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9191892062) an Stelle der Stopposition (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/266847310) in die Busrelationen aufgenommen. Warum? Kannst Du auch bitte das korrigieren. Danke
Grüße skyper
skyper (2021-10-27 15:43:32+00:00): Ok, die Relationen habe ich repariert. Verstehe nicht, wie Du den Knoten korrekterweise verschoben hast, aber die Mitgliedschaften nicht beibehalten hast. Ist das mal wieder ein Bug von iD?

Generell, sieht es in der Gegend leider krautig aus, mit sehr viel fehlenden Abbiegebeschränkungen und viele Landflächen sind mit Straßen und Gleisen verknüpft.
Grüße skyper
gscholz (2021-10-31 07:53:59+00:00): Hi Tremendous Judge,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding broken relations:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-56.16497&lat=-34.91630&zoom=14

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
Tremendous Judge (2021-11-02 15:22:50+00:00): Fixed!

Cheers
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-08-13 08:57:19+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9191940138/history has maxspeed = variable that was added in this edit
Can maxspeed:variable be used instead? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maxspeed:variable (feel free to retag it by yourself if it seems like a good idea to you)
Baloo Uriza (2025-08-14 00:13:02+00:00): Looks like it's already being used.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-10-11 03:50:14+00:00): I meant "instead" as opposed to "in addition to", in other words can maxspeed=variable be removed
Baloo Uriza (2025-10-11 14:02:12+00:00): Sure, especially since the proper conditional speed is already on the following segment eastbound.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-13 07:37:56+00:00): edited
kmpoppe (2021-10-27 18:18:15+00:00): Hello Ixquik Lucia,

this changeset looks strange, you've create many nodes with the same name that have no "real" tagging, as in they don't have a meaningful value.

Did you by any chance add something in the wrong?

Additionally, you have added a meaningless value to tag "mapillary" (from 1 through 8) that I will to delete at some point in time because it doesn't help the users.

I would love to hear back from you.

Thank you!

Kai
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:25:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees