piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-02-05 10:24:04+00:00): Hello
I urgency request you to stop these odd mappings. They make no sence
If you are continuing with these odd mappings I have to report you and you run into the risk to be blocked for further mappings.
Best regards
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-10 13:51:36+00:00): Please do not delete features
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117030126
Jeffrey Friedl (2023-01-31 02:31:12+00:00): サイクリングロードは「歩行者天国」ではなくて、サイクリンロードは「bike+foot path」です。
歩行者用の道路の場合には、自転車通行禁止は「footway」ですが、自転車も通行の場合は「bike+foot path」です。
Rakkka (2023-01-31 23:23:49+00:00): Jeffrey Friedl様

その件は2022年9月22～26日に私とメッセージでやり取りしていますのでご確認ください。

また10月にメーリングリストでその辺について変更する話がありましたので、そちらもご確認ください。
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ja/2022-October/011236.html

タグの誤りを指摘する場合は、根拠となるWikiのページを示していただくようお願いします。
archpdx (2022-02-05 05:19:03+00:00): Hi,
In the future please use changeset comments so that other mappers have a good sense about the changes you made in your changesets. You can read more about how to write 'good' changesets here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
WoSoe (2022-02-05 10:14:33+00:00): Hallo!
Ich glaub da ist bei den letzten Änderungssätzen einiges schief gelaufen.
Siehe hier:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.59446&lat=52.19326&zoom=10
Da hat ein einfaches Gebäude plötzlich 21 Nodes.
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/395711500

Gruß
WoSoe
Glitch-Hunter (2022-02-05 12:59:56+00:00): Hi danke für die Info werd ich mal fixen
ralley (2022-02-05 07:57:30+00:00): Please do not delete the wrongly tagged driveway - instead tag it as highway=service and service=driveway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117030651
rj_buchanan (2022-02-06 03:56:34+00:00): Thanks for your advice - please advise how I can undo the deletion and I will fix it.
ralley (2022-02-06 04:52:31+00:00): I see you worked out how to fix - thank you.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117030651
nick-28 (2022-02-10 19:03:37+00:00): Hallo jengelh,

du hast die Haltestelle Hillerse Berwartshäuser Straße mit "Nur Ausstieg" getaggt und ein Fixme angebracht, weil kein Einstiegshalt gefunden. War die Haltestelle mit "Nur Ausstieg" beschriftet? Ich würde vermuten, das der Bussteig (Endstation) für Ein- und Ausstieg genutzt und dann kurz dahinter gewendet wird. 

Zum Changeset-Kommentar: Die Network-Information ist nur redundant (bzw. optional), wenn ein stop area mit den entsprechenden Tags definiert ist. Siehe dazu das Wiki! Ansonsten bitte nicht entfernen. Buslinien werden oft umgeroutet, dann ist die Information weg!

Gruß, Nick
jengelh (2022-02-10 19:39:45+00:00): Wenn sich die Busrouten ändern und nix mehr an der Hst hält, gehört die Hst ohnehin zu keinem Netz mehr. Umgekehrt: wenn man in ein Verkehrsmittel einsteigt, zahlt man nicht notwendigerweise den VSN-Tarif nur weil die Hst nen network=VSN trägt. Deswegen bringt der network-Key auf Hst irgendwie nix.
jengelh (2022-02-10 19:50:34+00:00): Natürlich war sie mit Nur Ausstieg beschriftet, deswegen wurde es so eingetragen. Dafür spricht ja auch das Fehlen eines Aushangplans (departures_timetable=no).
Die "Wendeschleife" ist in der Praxis auch recht eng (kommt im Luftbild nicht rüber), das sind eher zwei Einfahrten, und für einen 12m-Bus ungeeignet. Fixme deswegen weil das alles mal zur rechten Zeit nochmal beobachtet werden muss.
nick-28 (2022-02-11 11:35:14+00:00): Hi,

die Grenzen der Netzwerke verschieben sich eher selten, Busrouten dagegen häufiger und
man kann nicht davon ausgehen, dass die Einträge immer vollständig aktuell gehalten werden. So kann es also durchaus passieren, dass die Information verschwindet, obwohl noch ein Bus da lang fährt, nur eben eine andere Linie. Aber wie dem auch sei, ich glaube das Wiki ist eindeutig: Die Bezeichnung des Netzwerkes gehört an die Haltestelle, insofern sie nicht an der "stop area"-relation steht. Wenn du da anderer Meinung bist,  sollte man das vielleicht mal im Forum diskutieren. Ungünstig ist übrigens auch, dass iD es als Problem markiert, wenn  die entsprechenden Tags an den Haltestellen fehlen. Von daher ist es sicher nur eine Frage der Zeit, bis der nächste Mapper die Tags wieder hinzufügt.

Gruß, nick
Kovoschiz (2022-02-05 04:26:09+00:00): Why would you remove the trees? They are not the same as the park.
Schröcker (2022-03-17 16:40:02+00:00): Hallo, barrier=gate sollte wohl eher ein Knoten sein?
Gruß!
user_5359 (2022-02-05 06:36:16+00:00): Hello! Please noticed: An address is part of the (main) building, not of the highway or property or traffic_signal.
teddyruxpin76 (2022-02-05 06:51:35+00:00): Hello! There is a traffic signal here, but I requested a review, there is a signal located at 34.099709,-118.338730 right across the street of selma and highland, and another at 34.099705,-118.338638 near selma ave.
teddyruxpin76 (2022-02-05 06:52:28+00:00): Please let me know if this makes sense
user_5359 (2022-02-05 07:04:17+00:00): Yes you can merge this two physical object to one OSM object. 

But in a review, all aspects are examined. And the postal address at a traffic light is only definitely wrong once. Please delete this information.
teddyruxpin76 (2022-02-05 07:26:42+00:00): Will Do, will delete!
teddyruxpin76 (2022-02-05 07:31:36+00:00): It has been deleted!
user_5359 (2022-02-05 07:51:26+00:00): See https://www.osm.org/changeset/117033838
clay_c (2022-02-12 01:55:31+00:00): Wouldn't the segment of US 190 between I-10 and LA 22 be motorway still? It's fully access-controlled, with 3 grade-separated interchanges, and even has a direct interchange with an Interstate.
literan (2022-04-08 09:01:39+00:00): Добрый день.

Подскажите, а какой источник названий дорожек в Аршиновском парке? (например, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/586965440/history)
MosKartograf (2022-04-20 05:14:42+00:00): Добрый день! Источник Фотосайт Московские парки путеводитель http://moscowparks.narod.ru основанный на мнении местных жителей. Официальных названий я не выявил.
literan (2022-04-20 08:16:11+00:00): по ссылке я ничего не нашел про Аршиновский парк. Плюс на этом сайте  стоит © 2007-2021, проект «Московские парки. Фотоальбом» - таким образом, копирование информации без персонального разрешения в OSM запрещено.

Давайте в качестве компромисса перенесем или в description, или в local_name - ибо эти названия непохожи на имена собственные.
MosKartograf (2022-04-20 10:29:59+00:00): Безусловно это local_name, только валидаторы ругаются на local_name без name и local_name не равно official_name. 
Можете переменить теги, на систему поиска названий это не влияет, а остальное на Вашу ответственность.
Явное разрешение на использование материалов по Аршиновскому парку есть и даже письмо автора сайта с просьбой отразить на ОСМ.
Источником могло быть http://moscowparks.narod.ru/search/?q=аршиновский+парк или на ленте http://moscowparks.narod.ru/index1.htm ныне 404 http://moscowparks.narod.ru/arshinpk/
literan (2022-04-20 18:05:21+00:00): сейчас поправлю
willkmis (2022-02-05 16:57:12+00:00): School nodes are often slightly offset because they were imported from GNIS over a decade ago and poorly aligned at that time. Instead of deleting the nodes, which usually represent real schools, is it likely more useful to move them to the correct place. Also, office=educational_institution is more for the administrative offices of school districts, actual schools should be tagged amenity=school.
teddyruxpin76 (2022-02-05 21:54:24+00:00): I was using what was available in the app! I thank you for bringing it to my attention! I will be careful and see how to fix it without deleting!
user_5359 (2022-02-05 06:40:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! An Aldi isn't a bag shop.
firstmapper (2022-02-05 12:27:35+00:00): I’m sorry I didn’t see grocery store and all the options were even farther off.
firstmapper (2022-02-05 12:34:15+00:00): Why didn’t fix it to the label you wanted instead of fully deleting it?
user_5359 (2022-02-05 19:32:07+00:00): Again, your data exists with a correct value! Please do not imply incorrect facts here!
cytryn (2022-02-06 18:08:58+00:00): Cześć,
Nie dodajemy nazw opisowych do obiektów, które nie mają nazwy własnej. Rzuć okiem na: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Nazwy#Nazwa_jest_tylko_nazw.C4.85
Pozdrawiam
user_5359 (2022-02-05 06:45:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM (again)! Did you see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/372704748? Please notice the difference on the housenumber: I can't merge this information.
firstmapper (2022-02-05 13:03:18+00:00): Thank you! It looks like they transposed the numbers. That’s not how the address is listed on the university’s website. I don’t understand why my edits are being fully deleted instead of using them as a chance to correct inaccurate information.
user_5359 (2022-02-05 19:28:49+00:00): Your edit exists! Please check the correct house number and then correct the way and delete your duplicate by yourself.
neuhausr (2022-02-08 15:59:32+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for mapping golf courses. However, please do put text in a hole's name tag unless it has a name other than the number (for example, Augusta National's hole #1 is also known as "Tea Olive"). If there is no name but a ref #, the hole will be displayed with the #. Happy mapping!
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-05 06:23:08+00:00): Typo fix

[roof:colour=black bricks] -> [roof:colour=#21373d]
[roof:leavel=1] -> [roof:levels=1]
[roof:material=asbestos] -> [roof:material=roof_tiles]
喵耳引力波 (2022-02-05 06:29:05+00:00): Typo fix

[roof:leavel=1] -> [roof:levels=1]
[roof:material=asbestos] -> [roof:material=roof_tiles]
kozaklevko (2022-10-21 20:46:22+00:00): Не согласен с полигоно, мне кажется там нет сплошного водохранилища, только разливmьі реки
Ewen Hill (2026-07-12 23:37:08+00:00): Hi SB, four years ago you renamed Moitch Park to Lake Park - do you remember why you did this please and what was the source? 

Can I also request that you explain your changes in the changeset comments rather than "Added details" as you do with all your edits please. In this instance, removing an Indigenous name from a park deserves some sort of explanation.
sb9576 (2026-07-13 06:00:57+00:00): Hi Ewen Hill. Yes, I do remember why in this instance, as it happens. In a nutshell, because after I was at the place and stared with my own eyes at the name shown “on the ground” as “Lake Park”, I reverted as version 5 a change I had made years earlier.

If you look at the history in the database, you’ll see that I mapped out the park some 13 years ago. I remember cycling through, and finding contradictory sources as to its name, so I left it unnamed after becoming aware of the contention behind it. User “takamaxo” then added the name “Lake Park” three years later in version 2, and after I physically visited the place and saw the name “Moitch Park” on the ground I “corrected” it in version 3 based on that.

Two years later, I was physically back at the place, and saw some information boards say Lake but the name Moitch absent from where I had seen it years earlier. I remember spending quite a bit of time walking around to eliminate the possibility that the sign had been moved, but, no, at that moment in time it seemed to have been _removed_. At this stage, I was getting rather annoyed, the name of this place seemed to be in flux, so I left the name as Moitch based on what I had observed earlier and the possibility that maybe they’re just in the process of replacing the sign, and as version 4 added Lake as an alt_name to express the multitude of names I was clearly observing.

But two years later the sign still wasn’t back, so as that version 5 I relented and reverted to the name in version 2 by “takamaxo”, and because I could find no sources for Moitch at that time also moved Moitch to old_name.

Since then it’s become a bit of a hobby of mine to see what the park is called whenever I pass through.

So Ewen, please assume good faith. In your description to version 9 you mention “the same press release”; perhaps add it as a source? But even if Moitch is now observably the current name of the park, are you sure it should be “disused:alt_name=Lake Park”? Because I *have* seen the park (variously) called “Lake Park” over a *decade*, so I suggest it should be tagged with “old_name=Lake Park”? Yes, the difference between old_name and disused:alt_name is subtle, but are you absolutely sure nobody is calling it Lake Park anymore?

And just to be clear, I prefer the name “Moitch Park” over “Lake Park”. Imagine if the park was called “Lake Park” and the lake was called “Park Lake” … I hope you get my point 😃.
Ewen Hill (2026-07-13 12:18:47+00:00): Hi SB,
  Thank you for your really detailed reply and reasoning which is really sound and agreed on your suggestions on the next edits. It took a lot of work to source a non-copyrighted release and check Mapillary and Bing Streetside but I am glad we have got sort of consensus. Thanks again and keep riding.
Langlaeufer (2022-02-08 14:50:13+00:00): Bzg. richtig taggen

path beinhaltet automatisch, dass Fußgänger, Radfahrer und Reiter erlaubt sind. Ein foot=yes und bicycle=yes bringen keinen Mehrwert. Ist der Radweg blau beschildert oder nicht? Ggf. ist er auf einzelnen Abschnitten unterschiedlich beschildert.
olo81 (2022-02-21 02:14:57+00:00): Czysty wandalizm :/ 
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C5%9Aluza_rowerowa
user_5239402 (2022-02-05 11:38:26+00:00): Hello Mapy_korean Also, please do use meaningful changeset comments - “1” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing.
Warin61 (2022-02-05 22:56:42+00:00): Hi,
The multipolygon relation 13761878 for the  brownfield was not closed. Additionally it carried a tag for a fence. I have closed the relation. And removed the fence tag - there would be gates to get through so the fence would not be continuous. 

Suggest - map the fences with separate gates. Then  include them in a relation for the brown field - the relation only has tags for the brown field not fences nor gates.
Amin Fozdar (2022-02-06 06:01:19+00:00): Those changes and problems were already there and I did not mess with the relations. If you know how to do them better, please do them
Warin61 (2022-02-06 11:43:14+00:00): Note that my comments stated the past tense. I have already made corrections. 

Relation 13761878 was created in this changeset. 
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13761878/history - version 1 is the start and the mapper there is you. 
I am not local to the area hence my comment to you so you are aware of the changes, so you can asses them from your local knowledge.
jmarchon (2022-02-05 07:27:05+00:00): Forgot the comment again:
Modified a restaurant that is closing soon
user_5359 (2022-02-05 07:51:02+00:00): Hello! I don't understand why you deleted the traffic light as well?
teddyruxpin76 (2022-02-05 07:52:56+00:00): I was in the area, currently using phone, I traveled to a different area to look at other places to contribute, will upload!
balint36 (2023-05-13 14:39:31+00:00): Na, kis Oha80 előszeretettel szólogat be nekem, miközben a hibáimat keresi, amit nem talál, ezért mindenféle mondvacsinált hülyeséget húz elő.
Arra légy oly kedves és választ adj nekem, hogy amíg ugatsz nekem egy változtatásban (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/134488896) olyan dolgok miatt, amiben teljesen tévedsz, addig te ebben a változtatásban létrehoztad a 83-as vonal szolgálati helyeit, és úgy jelölted, hogy azok még mindig üzemelnek.
A vonalat már megbontották, hogyan a fenében lenne Mánranovák-Homokterenye állomás még most is üzemelő? A realitást és a tényeket teljesen mellőzöd, és teljesen hibás az, amit csinálsz.
olo81 (2022-03-04 22:34:11+00:00): to nie jest las !
C2oc4 (2022-06-08 06:44:19+00:00): Dzień dobry. Przepraszam za wprowadzanie w błąd.
arukuni (2022-02-05 16:57:14+00:00): Rozumiem zmianę tagowania na aktualne, ale dlaczego wszystkie paczkomaty InPostu przy okazji straciły możliwość odbierania paczek?
I jakie jest źródło informacji, że rowerami 500 km od Kołobrzegu zaczął zarządzać "Kołobrzeski Rower Miejski"?
arukuni (2022-02-05 17:01:19+00:00): I skąd wziął się nagle automat paczkowy bułgarskiej firmy Speedy?
Jeśli tylko dlatego, że taki schemat jest w NSI to może warto się wstrzymać z takimi zmianami na granicy wandalizmu?
olo81 (2022-02-17 03:13:07+00:00): Proponuje zgłaszać. Użytkownik od dawna tak się zachowuje. W dodatku nie poprawia po sobie błędów. Przy ostatniej blokadzie miał odpowiadać na komentarze (poprawiać swoje błędy) nie odpowiedział na wszystkie, nie poprawił błędów  a dalej niszczy.
olo81 (2022-02-17 03:14:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5391
DaveF (2023-01-06 20:57:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/650597447/history#map=11/51.5401/-0.3282

Hi
To check, is the name you added to this path in the area, actually Public Right of Way references (prow_ref tag)? was it obtained from the local authority?
john inman (2023-01-07 13:19:35+00:00): Hi Dave ~ Information was not obtained from the local authority. The numbers are on the green footpath signs at either end. I double checked this morning to make sure there was no error & that signs & posts are still in place. I took photos which are available if needed. Please contact me again if you need to know more. ~ John
frozenrabi (2022-02-05 11:33:37+00:00): Is this a highway? I am afraid these are not highways. I think it is a waterway. Correct me if i am wrong. It has dead end on both sides and is not connected or linked with any of the highways/paths. I do not know the geography of that region i may be mistaken as well.
jeslop (2022-02-05 15:10:13+00:00): Hola FSDMAR, bienvenido a OSM, gracias por tu ciolaboración.

Una pequeña corrección, en vez de poner la época de creación de la mina en el nombre, es mejor utilizar la fecha de inicio conocida:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
abakus_uploader (2022-02-05 23:31:31+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Cristoffs (2022-02-06 15:30:24+00:00): Dyskusja jest przed nie po zmianie.
user_5359 (2022-02-06 15:43:03+00:00): Hello! If you add a name you should also remove the key noname=yes.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-19 22:34:48+00:00): Why is parking tag on ways? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=parking
Talopyo (2024-03-20 07:20:45+00:00): What do you mean? When you zoom te map the "P" markers are on parking spaces. Can you link the exact location?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2024-03-20 09:08:02+00:00): Sorry, for some reason I thought it was a continuous tagging practice but turns out it was just one way which I assume was an innocent mistake. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1028304653/history
Apologies
RicoElectrico (2022-02-05 15:14:12+00:00): Cześć, dodałeś dwa razy ten sam pensjonat ;)
IlBano (2023-01-21 18:15:45+00:00): Ciao Urbis13.
In questo changeset hai aggiunto ad alcuni nodi di Piazzale Gorini il tag junction=equal_priority che non è documentato da nessuna parte (in totale in Italia ce ne sono 7 a Milano).
Cosa intendi segnalare ?
La mappatura delle precedenze può essere esplicitata in presenza di cartelli, mentre la mappatura delle regole del CdS implicite (in questo caso precedenza a destra) normalmente no.

IlBano
Urbis13 (2023-01-21 18:54:22+00:00): Ciao IlBano,
l'intento era quello di segnalare che vige la precedenza a destra. Il tag lo avevo preso da Taginfo dove, come la pressoché totalità delle coppie presenti, non è documentato. Se ci fosse un tag più adatto per indicare un incrocio senza segnali l'avrei usato ma al tempo non c'era o almeno io non l'avevo trovato.
Per quanto riguarda la mappatura delle regole implicite ho capito e concordo con quello che dici in generale ma non penso sia applicabile a questo caso.
Immagina l'assenza di un tag specifico, in tal caso avrei il dubbio tra due situazioni:
* c'è una qualche regola di precedenza specifica ma non è stata mappata (è la situazione tipica su OSM, in cui quasi sempre non ci si mappano i segnali stradali)
* nell'incrocio vige effettivamente la precedenza a destra (possibile ma estremamente improbabile considerando che in Italia il CdS prevede la regola della precedenza a destra salvo diversa segnalazione ma poi la "diversa segnalazione" è presente nel 99% dei casi)
Se ci fai caso, sempre rimanendo in ambito stradale, è una situazione simile alla mappatura dei limiti di velocità. Se è un vigore un limite di velocità generale (ad es. il 90 km/h exteaurbano) anche quella è una regola implicta ma non si lascia la way senza indicazioni di sorta ma si specifica comunque il limite.

 Urbis13
IlBano (2023-01-22 09:26:32+00:00): Ciao Urbis13,

"dare la precedenza a destra" possiamo considerarlo un default, ovvero un dato che ci dà la possibilità di evitare di riempire la base dati di OSM di elementi che diamo per scontati (ovvero nella realtà non esistono cartelli in cui viene esplicitato "dai la precedenza a destra").
Se dovessimo mappare questo tipo di informazioni "legali" avremmo innanzitutto un lavoro immane da portare avanti e poi ci troveremmo con una informazione tecnicamente poco utile.
Il fine ultimo di tag di questo tipo è infatti quello di dare informazioni utili per il routing, ma in questo caso l'ipotetico software di navigazione che indicazione dovrebbe dare al conducente ? "attenzione, dare la precedenza a destra" ?
Ricordo una delle regole di good practice https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don't_map_local_legislation_if_not_bound_to_specific_objects.

In merito ai limiti di velocità questi si mappano in genere in presenza di cartelli, mentre come regola generale si lascia ai software che usano dati OSM di dedurre il valore in base a classificazione della highway, del mezzo usato e della nazione (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Default_speed_limits).

IlBano
IlBano (2023-01-22 18:27:02+00:00): Ciao Urbis13.
Grazie delle tue argomentazioni, ma rimango dell'idea che "dare la precedenza a destra" non debba essere mappato. Non sono il solo a  pensarlo perchè in tutti questi anni di vita di OSM e di miei spesi sulla mappa non ho visto sollevare il problema. Questo però ha una influenza relativa vista la natura collaborativa della mappa. Se ritieni di spenderti per portare avanti questa visione ti inviterei ad estendere il dibattito ad altri mapper tramite un post sulla mailing list, oppure sul portale di community. La portata dell'argomento è direi internazionale, ma penso che possa andare bene per iniziare i canali della comunità italiana.

Ciao

IlBano
korzhyk (2022-02-05 10:11:50+00:00): Шановний, чому ви займаєтесь вандалізмом? Про це буде повідомлено у DWG.
DikiyCat (2022-02-05 10:14:29+00:00): А в чому полягає вандалізм?
korzhyk (2022-02-05 10:17:53+00:00): Заміна офіційних name іноземними.
DikiyCat (2022-02-05 10:19:11+00:00): Так я лише додаю локалізацію, а імена ж вказуються ті, які використовуються в даному регіоні
ygcgjp5 (2022-02-13 17:47:50+00:00): darželis yra jehovos liudytojų maldos namai?
Bravo_two_zer0 (2022-02-13 17:55:25+00:00): Pataisyta.
surveyor54 (2022-02-05 12:28:58+00:00): Hi,
nur zur Info, in Hessen kann man jetzt die Gebäude von ALKIS (Katasterdaten) übernehmen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=74276

Gruß
surveyor54