piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Becca Wilson (2017-03-30 03:35:43+00:00): Hello Woodpeck,

Bing is okay in this area, but it is a little hard to determine the extent of the island due to the ice.  I aligned the island as best I could and removed the simplified geometry which originally existed. You can check out my edit here: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47217647.

My edit was from a MR task that a small group of us are working on fixing the geometry of small islands.

Thank you for the message
woodpeck (2018-12-14 14:22:44+00:00): I would like to understand what this is for. You mapped an area with only one tag, natural=water, out on the sea. It is not marked as a "fairway" like its neighbour areas, and it does not have a name either, so what does this area mean? Can it be deleted?
Ribechan (2018-12-14 15:23:59+00:00): Sorry, it has been a while since I made this modification so I do not really remember the purpose of it. Feel free to modify it in any way you think is good.
Davide_sd (2017-03-28 09:56:47+00:00): I wonder why you changed the name. "Parco regionale dei Colli Euganei" was the correct name, why did you changed that???? What are your intention with this edit????
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
bhousel (2017-03-28 14:25:49+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for your contribution!
woodpeck (2017-03-28 21:56:27+00:00): You modified this island but left the glacier in place that now cuts right through the island which can't be right. Why the focus on just the island geometry? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
Evelyn Desouzaa (2017-03-30 03:39:50+00:00): Hey Woodpeck,   

Thanks for pointing that out, I have since fixed the glacier feature to not intersect the island.  This edit was made as part of a MapRoulette challenge for Island and Shoreline alignment.  There's is a small group of us working on fixing small islands in OSM.  

Thanks, Evelyn
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
Ale_Zena_IT (2017-03-28 08:51:12+00:00): Please, do write a more descriptive comment in your changesets.
In the last 15 days you did 554 changeset, all with the 'trace' comment.
Comment are very useful to the people who monitor activities.

Moreover, many people in Italy is worried about your massive edit; consider to be more collaborative to the message they send you.
Best regards and happy mapping.
woodpeck (2017-03-28 21:54:59+00:00): You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery just shows a blurry cloud of white and you can't even see that there's supposed to be an island here so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
Ashley Rose (2017-03-30 23:39:12+00:00): There's some rock visible in Bing here. Its not unreasonable to assume that the blurry rock seen in imagery is the same feature represented by the existing island (w232976567), so I tried to improve the island with Bing. However you are right that I should not have edited this island with only Bing. Thanks for the call-out, I will avoid editing these islands with blurry imagery in the future. I am finding these overly angular islands using a MapRoulette challenge.
DD1GJ (2017-03-28 19:08:39+00:00): Hallo mbs, Du hast leider die Frage von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47198104 nach einer Nutzungserlaubnis für www.essofuelfinder.de noch nicht beantwortet ...
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
Supaplex (2017-04-07 15:06:53+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
literan (2017-03-28 12:06:00+00:00): не надо вешать названия соседней улицы на дворовые проезды, а также название на грунтовую дорогу. Я это откачу.
literan (2017-03-28 11:10:25+00:00): здравствуйте. Пожалуйста, не надо придумывать парки (и тем более рисовать их тяп-ляп, с пересечением заборов). Дворовая территория это не парк
Spanholz (2017-03-28 09:10:31+00:00): Correct changeset name: Relocated Dr. Seuss House, Aligned roads in the area
Carnildo (2017-03-29 08:37:09+00:00): Wrong "Grandfather Mountain".  The links you added were for one in North Carolina, not the one in Idaho.
fidcastro (2017-04-18 09:41:32+00:00): Hi Carnildo, thank you for reverting the data.  The attributes were added in error.  I have reached out to OSM editors working in North Carolina.  The other Grandfather Mountain is now searchable in nominatim and we are actively working to improve that data.  Many thanks, Castro."
woodpeck (2017-03-28 21:53:39+00:00): You have improved the coastline for this island, but there's an out-of-sync admin boundary half overlapping the island. Did you notice that? It would have been good if, while modifying the island, you had corrected the admin boundary as well. (Admin boundaries are broken all over the place but if you start editing in an area, it can't hurt to fix them.)
Eva Blue (2017-03-30 02:30:14+00:00): I noticed the admin boundary, but I was under the impression that these features should only be edited with special resources, especially because they are not visible in imagery. I think that if I was in the habit of editing admin boundaries using only Bing and Mapbox, other OSM users would rightly point out that these edits are essentially guesses.
Rom1 (2017-03-28 11:55:37+00:00): Bonjour, "gpx" n'est pas une valeur correcte pour le tag "source". C'est bien "survey" qu'il convient d'employer pour "Tracé GPS ou autre appareil de mesure" cf. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:source?uselang=fr
DaveF (2017-03-28 13:35:49+00:00): Hi Ashley
To double check, did you mean to delete a pier in Norway: http://osmlab.github.io/changeset-map/#47223910?
Ashley Rose (2017-03-30 23:20:52+00:00): Hi Dave,
Thanks for catching that, I did not mean to. I've added the pier back: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483803328 
Thanks again,
Ashley
Hjart (2017-03-28 10:09:27+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag.
Hvad var dog hensigten med de to små ruterelationer på Anholt?
cykelcasper (2017-03-28 10:18:35+00:00): Tak og velbekommen. Meningen var at da vejene er farbare på cykel, at kunne ruteplanlægge dem i fx naviki, bikemap osv.
Hjart (2017-03-28 10:33:18+00:00): Er der skiltede ruter på de angivne steder på Anholt?
cykelcasper (2017-03-28 10:35:06+00:00): Nok næppe. Det er ment som ruteforeslag (uskiltede ruter).
Hjart (2017-03-28 10:38:45+00:00): Så vidt jeg ved (jeg har kun få gange forsøgt mig med Naviki & Bikemap) behøver man ikke lave ruterelationer i vores database for at kunne ruteplanlægge i dem.
Hjart (2017-03-28 10:40:28+00:00): Ruterelationer (til bil, cykel, etc) i selve OSM benyttes normalt kun til angivelse af officielle skiltede ruter.
Hjart (2017-03-28 10:44:59+00:00): Er du iøvrigt sikker på at det er sikkert at cykle på den sti på Tunø? Terrænet ser lidt farligt ud.
2567ghjkldfg8 (2017-03-29 10:41:15+00:00): Sind die neu hinzugefügten Straßen nicht eher unbenannte Einfahrten (d.h. service=driveway)?
wochenblatt (2017-03-30 09:08:50+00:00): Hallo,
sollen wir dann ab sofort die Hauszufahrten statt "highway service" "highway driveway" nennen? Oder nur "driveway"?
Vielen Dank im Voraus für eine schnelle Info!
2567ghjkldfg8 (2017-03-30 09:50:09+00:00): Hallo,
laut wiki [1] ist die offizielle Variante mit highway=service und service=driveway.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_to_map_a
ma-rt-in (2017-03-28 11:32:13+00:00): Hallo,
als addr:suburb bitte entweder Mitte oder Gartenfeld, nicht beides.
Zartbitter (2017-03-28 12:58:28+00:00): Da ich die Stadtviertel in Trier nicht kenne, habe ich suburb vom Node Golden Dragon im selben Gebäude auf die Nachbar-Nodes, deren Hausnummern/Str. ich hatte, übernommen. Dort hat es HoloDuke vor einem Jahr so gemappt. Bitte sie/ihn fragen oder einfach korrigieren.
andygol (2017-03-28 10:36:07+00:00): Hi, Euro Région Aquitaine Euskadi
I've spotted that you've  changed value of name tags here and around recently.

Could you explain if there is an agreement in the local OSM community about naming? Thus as in common cases tag name is used for name that is present "on the ground", for name in other languages should be used name:<lng> tags. So, `name:eu=Angelu` is enough for this purpose.
Qwertii (2017-03-28 09:40:49+00:00): Wrong change message but meh
zbronek (2017-03-29 07:17:56+00:00): Wyrok NSA: II OSK 1039/15 (http://orzeczenia.nsa.gov.pl/doc/88E15DE78E)
literan (2017-03-28 11:52:57+00:00): ваши фейковые парки удалены, а вы, при продолжении, будете заблокированы
Владимир К (2018-02-14 07:28:01+00:00): а номера домов вы на месте брали? в лесной купавне, например с другими картами не сходядся номера. и с гепланом тоже.
Pacific (2018-02-19 12:14:45+00:00): я всегда на месте смотрю. сейчас, к сожалению не могу перепроверить, но, на момент правки было именно так.
Владимир К (2018-02-19 12:31:59+00:00): хм. что же теперь делать?:) надо как-то улицы ещё назвать. Полянки, например, совсем нет. А лесная улица в другой стороне
Pacific (2018-02-19 14:15:29+00:00): Сложно сказать, если есть более свежие данные, то нужно конечно брать их. Если нет, то, ждать, пока они не появятся. До того, как я проставил номера домов они же вообще были безномерными.
Constable (2017-03-28 16:37:31+00:00): Sir, what does this edit has to do with "Aweil, South Sudan #MissingMaps #buildings #settlements #hotosm-project-2520" ? over than that, why did you replace a building with a landuse=residential?
Do you have any local knowledge of the area?
Constable (2017-03-29 10:33:51+00:00): I've restored the building with changeset n.47255790
eggie (2017-03-28 13:53:38+00:00): Dan zet ik er nog even cycleway=opposite bij anders routeert het nog niet.
Gazer75 (2017-07-02 03:52:08+00:00): Er Ring 2 flytta til Kværnerveien? Litt dårlig klassifisering i området. Bør ikkje hoppe opp og ned slik mellom trunk, tertiary og primary. Om Ring 2 fortsatt går via Bispegata og St. Harvards gate så burde vel den kanskje få secondary?
Tarall (2017-07-02 05:01:56+00:00): Ring 2 er flytta. Har til og med snakka med Statens vegvesen om dette (som for øvrig ikke har oppdatert veikartet sitt). Hun jeg prata med var helt klar på at Ring 2 er flytta til Kværnerveien. Google-maps er oppdatert, bortsett fra at de ikke har greid å fjerne den utdaterte 161-merkinga på nedre dela av St. Halvards gate og Bispegata.
Gazer75 (2017-07-02 07:04:27+00:00): Så Kværnerveien skal vere Kv161 + Ring2?
Bør vel få fikse samanhengande primary frå E6 og fjerne ref på St. Halvards gate vest for Kværnerveien. Kva med Dyvekes vei? Den står som secondary ned til Bispegata. Virkar litt feil å la secondary ende der. Enten så må den ned til tertiary eller så bør Bispegata opp til secondary.
Tarall (2017-07-02 08:43:17+00:00): Kværnerveien skal være Ring 2. Ring 2 skal starte/ende i øst i E6 (trafikkmaskina i Lodalen). Sjekk google-maps. Dyvekes vei skal nedgraderes til samme nivå som Bispegata. Krysset Oslo gate / Bispegata heter forøvrig "Oslo torg". Navnsatt i 1997, på grunnlag av gammelt navn. Er skilta Oslo torg fra rundt 2013. Ja, det er korrekt å fjerne 161-merkinga på nedre del av St. Halvards gate samt Bispegata. Ps. Er litt usikker på den 161-merkinga også på Ring 2, om ikke 161 er blitt Kv-nummer? 161 er jo det gamle Riksveis-numre på Ring 2, og Ring 2 er jo fra og med 2010 (tror det var da), kommunal.
Tarall (2017-07-02 08:53:49+00:00): For øvrig skal også Dronning Eufmeias gate og Langkaia nedgraderes (jf. Bispegata). Ser at det er en haug med gamle E18-markeringer som henger igjen i Bjørvika. Litt dumt. E18 går nå via Bjørvikatunnelen (under vannet) og derfra videre via ymse tunneler i begge retninger (ikke på overflaten).
Gazer75 (2017-07-02 14:53:37+00:00): Husk på at det er ingen fylkesvegar i Oslo, så det har vore lagt opp med eit eige system for å få god ruting her. Vi må nok berre vente på data frå SVV og Oslo kommune når det gjeld Bjørvika. Meiner og at eg fekk beskjed ein gong at vegen frå Vippetangen til tunnelen vil vere E18 sidan det er ei internasjonal havn.
Trur kanskje ein diskusjon på mailing lista er på sin plass. Greit å få med alle som mappar i Oslo slik at de blir einige om fornuftig klasifisering.
Tarall (2017-07-02 18:59:02+00:00): Uansett er det uproblematisk å rette opp i området Gamlebyen/Lodalen! Slik google-maps har gjort. Unødig å henge etter her, tykkjer eg!
Gazer75 (2017-07-02 21:51:51+00:00): Har fiksa samanhengande primary og ref for Ring 2 på Kværnerveien. Meldt inn eit feilspørsmål på Dronning Eufemias gate til SVV via http://fiksvegdata.opentns.org/ så får vi sjå kva svaret blir ;)
Gazer75 (2017-07-03 06:32:10+00:00): Fekk svar at Dronning Eufemias gate fortsatt skal vere del av E18
Tarall (2017-07-03 07:07:24+00:00): Ok. Takk. Flott med rensing i Ring 2 /161 Dyvekes vei kan du uansett nedgradere. Det har t.o.m. Vegsvesenet gjort på kartet sitt.
NKA (2017-07-03 08:10:05+00:00): Dyvekes vei og Bispegata har samme funksjonelle vegklasse fra Oslo kommune som de andre secondary i byen.
Gazer75 (2017-07-03 08:17:56+00:00): Kan vere at dei blir nedgradert til kl 5, men at det ikkje kjem fram i NVDB endå. Slike ting kan ofte ta lang tid.
Vincent de Phily (2017-03-29 10:21:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM, great to have some local knowledge in Fethard :)

Watch out when changing a street name: you should edit the existing street rather than adding a new one. Also, a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dliving_street is something rather specific, in Ireland generally only applicable to some housing estates. From the imagery, Watergate Street looks more like residential. I applied both fixes in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47255265

Keep it up :) Don't hesitate to ask questions and check the docs.
literan (2017-03-28 11:29:13+00:00): stop vandal map, painting parks everywhere! Reverting
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-04 21:20:40+00:00): Can you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1258234 ?
Владимир К (2017-03-29 06:22:52+00:00): вы домик поломали. Видимо случайно вот эту точку https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1064429788 зацепили
literan (2017-03-28 11:44:36+00:00): your vandalism will be reverted. Next time u will be blocked
FahRadler (2017-03-29 09:14:13+00:00): Hallo,

willkommen bei OSM.

Schön dass du die weltbeste Karte verbessern möchtest.

Du hast einen tag ("punkt") bei der Arbeitskammer eingefügt.
Dein tag ist nur ein Name mit Adresse und Website.
Das umschreibt die Funktion der Arbeitskammer aber unzureichend. Hierfür gibt es schöne tags die das beschreiben (office=association).
Zudem hat das Gebäude in dem sich die Arbeitskammer befindet bereits diese tags seit 2012. Damit ist dein Eintrag doppelt - ich lösche ihn.
Bitte achte zukünftig auf bestehende Einträge (nicht löschen - ergänzen).
Hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Map_Features
kannst du nach passenden tags suchen.

Viel Spaß
ma-rt-in (2017-03-28 11:28:23+00:00): Hallo,

warum verwendest du noch das tag hw=platform, obwohl pt=platform das neu standatisierte Tag ist?
Zartbitter (2017-03-28 12:54:40+00:00): Ich verwende highway=bus_stop, nicht highway=platform wie du schreibst. pt=pf ist ergänzend zu hw=bs, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop#Bus_stop
Nakaner-repair (2017-06-18 20:43:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 49643350 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by Müritz-Nationalpark and changesets being in conflict with this revert. See https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646416#p646416 and comments of this revert.
literan (2017-03-28 11:48:09+00:00): Деревья с лавками во дворах - это не парки. Данные объекты удалю (в покемон го играете?)
SerGol (2017-03-28 12:42:04+00:00): Согласен, на парк не тянет. Но эта территория не просто деревья с лавочками. Аналогичные скверики в Химках обозначены как "Парк отдыха", я специально предварительно смотрел похожие объекты.
literan (2017-03-28 12:59:03+00:00): Подскажите, а где эти "Парки отдыха"? Парк в понятии OSM - это специально отведенная и должным образом поддерживаемое публичное пространство. Пруф на парк должен быть (например, в Москве есть определенный реестр, в бюджете есть строки финансирования на каждый парк)
SerGol (2017-03-28 13:15:48+00:00): С парками абсолютно согласен. Не настаиваю, моя ошибка.
Те парки на которые я ориентировался (на самом деле, как вы говорите деревья с лавками):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=55.8992753940981&lon=37.4489837510375&mlat=55.8992753940981&mlon=37.4489837510375&zoom=17
второй
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=55.90045578211&lon=37.4573853349274&mlat=55.90045578211&mlon=37.4573853349274&zoom=17
eggie (2017-03-28 13:59:55+00:00): Rosario is double taged now, so I will delete one restaurant.
Владимир К (2017-04-12 14:41:20+00:00): покемонщик что ли?
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
BCNorwich (2017-03-28 13:46:25+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap. 
Unfortunately you placed the new pedestrian highway on top of and along several trunk roads. Making in effect a duplicated way. Thus I have reverted (removed ) the new pedestrian way.

If it was your intention to mark up a map for running/walking then OSM is not the place for it. OSM is a live worldwide map so any changes are seen by the world.

Regards
FraMauro (2017-03-28 12:57:00+00:00): La "Fattoria felice" risulta essere una attività commerciale. Probabilmente "building=farm" o "landuse=farmyard" sarebbero meglio di "place=farm"
Mirtillo Rosso Family Hotel (2017-03-29 12:33:06+00:00): Non mi trova questo elemento. Di fatto è un'azienda agricola e questa è la sua sede. Se però ritieni più corretta la tua indicazione la modifichi tu che non riesco? Grazie
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
Anonix35 (2017-03-28 17:57:58+00:00): Thank you to have fixed it
wolfbert (2017-03-28 19:51:23+00:00): You're welcome!
manings (2017-03-28 16:00:22+00:00): You provided all contact info but did not classify the feature.  Is it an office (I think so) or a shop?
escada (2017-05-13 15:35:21+00:00): Beste,

ik denk dat u iets te ijverig te werk bent gegaan, zonder lokale kennis. De N16 heeft nog steeds een maximum toegelaten snelheid van 90 tussen Willebroek en Temse.
Ik heb de juiste snelheid teruggezet.

mvg
Ilona_S (2017-05-15 08:47:01+00:00): Dear,

Thank you very much for your correction.

Best regards,
L'imaginaire (2017-03-28 12:19:09+00:00): Both the bus station and the museum were already on the map, I'll have to delete your entries.
eggie (2017-03-28 14:06:33+00:00): Stuur Dick even een berichtje of zet een note erbij. note=situatie maart 2017 kadaster pdok 2016 klopt niet meer. Dat spaart een hoop ergernis.
eggie (2017-03-28 14:11:02+00:00): 'k Heb een note toegevoegd. 'k Den dat de fietsroute nog moet worden aangepast. Zou  Dick even vragen, want die heeft z'n handen vol aan het nieuwe routenetwerk in Gelderland.
dvdhoven (2017-03-28 15:36:03+00:00): Hallo Klasigheid,

Mijn excuses.

Ik heb teveel op de luchtfoto en te weinig op mijn eigen foto's gekeken.
Ik had het kunnen zien.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Klasigheid (2017-03-29 09:19:15+00:00): Geeft niet, kan gebeuren.
literan (2017-03-29 12:38:32+00:00): не надо наносить на карту выдуманные парки. Деревья с площадками между домов парками не являются.
Alexander-II (2017-03-29 10:27:18+00:00): Правка будет отменена. Вы в ней убрали с карты остров, а вместо него нанесли поверх воды парк с текстом, которое не является наименованием
eggie (2017-03-28 14:13:50+00:00): Welkom op OSM.

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen. Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
Alexander-II (2017-03-29 10:23:12+00:00): Здравствуйте и добро пожаловать в OpenStreetMap. Не описывайте в поле name создаваемый объект. Это поле предназначено только для названий (имен собственных). "Парк для прогулок" — почти наверняка не является названием.
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
Alexander-II (2017-03-29 10:07:18+00:00): Здравствуйте. Прошу вас не указывать в поле name описание объектов. Это поле только для названий (имен собственных). Т.е. "автомойка" - это не name. К тому же, что это автомойка ясно из типа.
Я поправлю.
user_2842609 (2017-03-31 20:06:57+00:00): Revert changes.
SomeoneElse (2017-03-28 14:18:53+00:00): Er - you've just deleted the weather buoy at lat 0, lon 0.
Is it definitely no longer there?
It has its own web page:
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=13010
srividya_c (2017-03-30 09:44:37+00:00): Oh never knew this. Will make sure I keep an eye on this node. 

Thank you for sharing.
SomeoneElse (2017-03-30 11:05:03+00:00): There's actually no recent data from it, but there's actually no recent data from any of the Atlantic stations: http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/obs.shtml so I'm guessing that that's just a glitch.
Constable (2017-03-28 20:05:04+00:00): this polygon, tagged as area=yes doesn't make any sense
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
user_5359 (2017-03-28 18:00:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building!