piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Peter_Sullivan (2019-02-26 22:18:41+00:00): #salesforcewest
InsertUser (2019-02-26 23:38:28+00:00): What is your data source for this?
TheAnimappor (2019-02-27 00:01:21+00:00): Hi there!  I saw you updated this road’s name to Queen’s Cove Road, so I filled in the gaps since the previous name was still appearing on both ends. Does it look right to you?
InsertUser (2019-02-27 08:17:10+00:00): I think the signage was inconsistent when I was last there, with part of it called Queen's Cove Drive. I'm not entirely sure where the name changes from GB Highway; I know what would be logical, but logic doesn't always play a huge role.
TheAnimappor (2019-02-27 17:30:26+00:00): Understood. I was checking over name consistencies and I thought that you had skipped over those segments by accident.

You bring up a great point. Could Grand Bahama Highway be the alternate name perhaps, and Queen’s Cove be the official name?
InsertUser (2019-02-27 19:26:37+00:00): Not really, it's officially Grand Bahama Highway east of Mall Drive. I'm just not sure if the name change is at the roundabout or at Airport road where it becomes a single carriageway.
TheAnimappor (2019-02-28 00:18:40+00:00): Okay, I will leave this area as-is until someone can verify.
mariotomo (2019-11-28 12:15:26+00:00): hola.  qué es esta "cancha"?  un leisure=pitch?  conoces el deporte que se practica?  para indicarlo en el sport=*.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch
gsa (2019-03-31 13:53:49+00:00): What is your source for the heigth of Mount Joffre? You changed it from 3450 m to 3433 m.
ManelG (2019-03-31 16:00:23+00:00): Canadian Digital Elevation Model shows 3427 and bivouac.com (refered by the Wikipedia article) shows 3433. Other sources (peakbagger, peakvisor) also indicate 3433m.
gsa (2019-03-31 17:56:51+00:00): Thanks
DUGA (2021-05-31 15:56:09+00:00): Please do not add cell towers in this way. There is no need to map it as an area unless it is a huge tower (for example AT&T long line structure)

What you should do at least:

1. Add a fence/wall
2. Add the tower as point
3. Specify communication type if you know

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/673233154#map=19/40.04246/-76.23598
tornado0910 (2021-06-01 16:47:55+00:00): My apologies. Thank you for the clarification!
mueschel (2019-03-02 22:27:25+00:00): Ich fürchte, dass dieser Way hier keine git submodule hat 8-)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/673238547
gzin (2019-03-03 05:51:35+00:00): 8-) ups, sowas hab ich ja noch nie gesehen! Muss ein Copy&Paste-Fehler gewesen sein ;-), danke fürs Aufmerksam machen. (...und dann noch dieser Begriff "Wels, Streifweg" bei diesem Changeset, das hat ja auch nicht gepasst...)
muralito (2024-08-21 04:58:07+00:00): Hi. "fairway" does not imply flow. Do you agree to change to "flowline"? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dflowline
ftrebien (2024-08-21 14:03:06+00:00): Hi. Although the main route along Lagoa dos Patos is not a centerline, so it is not waterway=flowline, some of the branching routes fit both definitions, as they are both tributaries (waterway=flowline) and navigable routes (waterway=fairway). I mapped them based on GPS tracks and depth maps, so I think they are currently closer to waterway=fairway. Since waterway=flowline preferentially represents centerlines, I think it is intended for illustration or minimal routing when there is little information available about a body of water.

Using waterway=flowline for tributaries is an emerging mapping practice in North America (e.g. Delaware Bay and Lake Ontario), but not in Europe (e.g. Wadden Sea). It may be best to wait and see if this is adopted globally, neither are supported by apps yet, right? There are also some inconsistencies in this recent adoption, for example, waterway=flowline is used in Lake Ontario for navigable routes along the edge of the lake, away from the lake's centerline, while in Delaware Bay there are two overlapping lines, one mapped as waterway=flowline, and another as waterway=fairway.
muralito (2024-08-21 19:02:55+00:00): Yes, its something new. I'm starting using https://waterwaymap.org/ and try to have the Rio de la Plata basin correctly mapped, so i started in two fronts, one from the south (so having the Lagoa dos Patos well mapped and their basin in one colour is important to the easy visualization)  and another from the north (is not clear to me yet, but Plata basin should not go to the nw of aprox. the line between Rio de Janeiro and Brasilia). Here an example https://mapasmilhaud.com/mapas-geograficos/cuencas-hidrograficas-de-sudamerica-2022/
ftrebien (2024-08-21 22:36:28+00:00): If you go to Settings and choose "Navigable by boat", these fairways show up, probably because of the access tags. I just requested full support for fairways in the issue tracker, let's see. As for the Plata basin, years ago I added navigability details to the Uruguay River between Argentina and Rio Grande do Sul based on data from the Brazilian navy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brazil/RS/Hidrovias#Refer%C3%AAncias), but further north I left it for the local mappers - who unfortunately never took an interest.
smootheFiets (2020-01-17 14:37:09+00:00): Bonjour,

Petite question sur la voirie "sentier particulier" : est-ce que c'est bien le nom balisé du sentier ? Sinon, ce serait probablement mieux d'éffacer l'attribut "name" et de mettre "access" à la place. access=no ? access=permissive ? access=destination ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:access

Cordialement,
MMMigo
IWBRABANT (2020-01-22 11:48:24+00:00): Il se nomme comme cela à L'atlas de  1841.Je ne sais ce que ça signifiait à l'époque... "privé?" En tout cas, il est "coupé" par le chemin de fer. 
Cordialement.
Spanholz (2019-03-01 10:58:35+00:00): Great work in Cumberland.  Cool to see some houses there

I just added some residential areas around The Dingle :)
gurglypipe (2019-02-27 08:48:23+00:00): Thanks for contributing! I noticed this change and have a few questions.

OS Locator says the road is called The Sidings. Does it actually say Siding Close on the road sign? Is there another road nearby (or part of this road) which is called The Sidings?

What do you mean by ‘car barrier’? If there’s a gate accessible only by residents then it’s possible to map that separately.
ShinesMapper (2019-02-28 02:46:48+00:00): Thanks for the feedback!

The road is called Siding Close, I couldn't see a road called The Sidings. Here's a photo of the sign https://i.imgur.com/bNCBsOF.jpg

Most of the road and the apartment building were built around 2012 or 2013 as far as I know, so it's certainly possible that it was called The Sidings before that.

The car barrier is indeed a gate only accessible to residents. I'll make the change and map it accordingly.
gurglypipe (2019-02-28 08:24:30+00:00): That looks great, thanks for checking up on it and adding the barrier. lift_gate looks like an appropriate way of tagging it.

The reason I was asking is because the open data from Ordnance Survey calls the road The Sidings, but it does occasionally contain mistakes. I guess this is one of those times.

I’ve added not:name=The Sidings to make it clear that the new name is correct and has been checked, and also added a few other properties to the road in this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67642702. Please let me know if you think any of those changes are wrong, as I’ve just based them on what was in your photo.

One last question: is there a way to get from the car park at the end of the road to the footpath heading north to Morecambe Road? If so it would be good to stick a footpath connection in there. Otherwise, the end node of the road should be tagged noexit=yes to make it clear it’s a dead end (for cars *and* pedestrians).

Thanks a lot! :-)
ShinesMapper (2019-02-28 20:12:41+00:00): Thank you!

Your changes look good. There's a footpath behind the building and at the end of the carpark that is not connected to anything else, so I made another edit and added car parks/bike shed and added a little footpath, see here https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67663007 .

Thanks for your help!
aharvey (2019-04-23 04:04:22+00:00): Could you explain maritime=yes in this context? Is this according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:maritime "Practically it is used for administrative boundaries that are located outside the coastline independent of their function and admin_level=*."

So any admin_boundary outside the coastline needs this tag?
jordol (2019-04-23 04:57:28+00:00): That was my understanding that these national parks / marine parks / etc should have this tag when they are solely in the water. 

My interest was in the Australia coastal area so it was easy enough to flag them all manually.
aharvey (2019-04-23 05:15:19+00:00): Okay, got it. I also read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dmaritime which says "maritime=yes to state that this is a maritime border, so it can be rendered correctly/different from land borders"

So I think based on this you're using the tag correctly here. I'll add it to a few aquatic reserves you missed ;)
lmagreault (2019-03-04 08:52:22+00:00): Salut, le poste de transformation de Piételle (39061P0005) est bien à son emplacement initial au croisement de la D61 et de la route de Bissia. Il n'est pas encore en service. Vérifié le 03/03.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67602251
pyrog (2019-03-04 09:00:57+00:00): Ok. J'étais en train d'analyser mes photos de terrain… Je vois grace à Deep History que j'ai mis le nouveau en poste sur poteau.
Est-ce que je le met en construction:power=substation tant qu'il n'est pas raccordé ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67602251
pyrog (2019-03-04 09:05:28+00:00): Je viens de comprendre. Tu avais créer le poste en construction et moi j'ai déplacé le noeud pour le mettre sur le poste sur poteau actuellement en service. (Au passage, ils ont la même référence GDO et le même nom)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67602251
lmagreault (2019-03-04 09:15:27+00:00): J'avais ajouté deux postes en construction à Bissia et Piételle. Ils sont raccordés mais pas encore en service donc on peut mettre en construction je pense.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67602251
pyrog (2019-03-04 09:22:03+00:00): Je vais faire attention pour celui de Bissia (et corriger celui de Piételle).
Pour info, les câbles souterrains sont tirés, mais pas encore raccordés à ce jour (ni au poste, ni à la remontée aéro souterraine)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67602251
Minh Nguyen (2020-10-16 00:13:20+00:00): This change didn’t have the effect you probably intended. Multi-use paths in the U.S. are most commonly mapped as bike trails or walkways depending on what they’re more widely known as. iD has a separate section to indicate specifically whether pedestrians, cyclists, and horseback riders are allowed. In this case, by changing the trails to paths, no router can be confident that either pedestrians or cyclists are allowed.
Glassman (2019-02-27 06:53:49+00:00): Rather than deleting the building, just delete the business tags. That way if the building gets another tenant, all of the address tags can most likely be reused. I'm reverting this edit so the address and building can be reused. If the building has been removed, feel free to delete it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67602894
wambacher (2019-03-03 22:52:03+00:00): Hi,
admin level=2 IS FOR COUNTRIES ONLY

as a result you killed the whole Seycheles from OSM.

reverted.

walter
harlock974 (2019-03-04 01:47:53+00:00): Hi,
I'm very sorry for this mistake.
I was trying to improve the fact that islands names don't show at small scales (and some nearly never show). I will be glad if you could point me to a way to achieve this.
wambacher (2019-03-04 10:02:40+00:00): Hi,

that's not easy and to be honest, i don't know exactly what to do.

you may separate the admin boundary from the coastline and use two overlapping objects:.

The existing relation tagged as "boundary=administrative, admin_level=6, type=boundary, name=Mahe, ..." 
and a overlapping closed way with "natural=coastline, place=island, name=what you want"

May be that helps.

walter
mavl (2019-07-21 13:41:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:41:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
ftcat (2019-03-04 07:06:52+00:00): Please do not change the classification of Cairo Road to Trunk. Heavy vehicles are not permitted to use this road. It is the extremely busy and congested main street of Lusaka. If you are not familiar with the major towns don't change the classifications of the highways. I'm sure you would not take kindly to someone from Africa coming and making changes to your home town.
ftcat (2019-03-04 07:40:05+00:00): Looking at your changes it would appear you have 'reverted' a changeset that had already been reverted, in other words returned it to the incorrect classification.
mapsGR (2019-03-05 17:34:43+00:00): Hi ftcat,  I was trying to create a more consistent T2 network and thought the update in classification was logical based on overall function. You mention that it is the main road in Lusaka which makes it a major roadway and trunk could be an appropriate designation. If vehicle restrictions exist would it be possible to use the access restrictions like hgv restrictions (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:hgv)? 

I also noticed that the T2 ref tag is missing on Cairo road but starts back up on the north side of Northend roundabout (way 405672333). Does this gap in the highway reference actually exist or can we update this section to include this tag?”
ftcat (2019-03-05 18:05:56+00:00): Hi MapsGR,

I'm not sure of the official government position on the T2 reference. I would think logically it should follow Lumumba Road but was originally Cairo Road. Historically Cairo Road got its name as it was on the road north for people travelling from the Cape to Cairo during the colonial period. They had so many of these overland travelers they called it Cairo Road. It together with the railway line was Cecil Rhodes' Cape to Cairo connection. Lusaka has grown from a small rail siding just over 100 years ago to what it is now. Leave the taggin g as it is and I will try to find out what the official position is
ftcat (2019-03-05 19:19:45+00:00): Hi MapsGR,

I have just had a look at Pretoria in South Africa and the trunk roads are only mapped as such outside of the center of the city. The M4 to the west does not connect as a trunk to the M2 in the east even though the M4 is tagged as such through the center of the city. This is the principal I was following with Lusaka. As for the T2 ref I will follow up on that.
mapsGR (2019-03-08 22:19:30+00:00): Hi ftcat,
Thanks for looking into the T2 ref route, if you find any further information let me know.
ftcat (2019-03-25 08:17:11+00:00): Hi I have changed 'Escarpment Road' to the alt_name as apart from the expat community it is not known by this name. I hope you don't mind. This road was initially a ZESCO maintenance road to maintain the power line from Leopards Hill to Chirundu until Chieftainess Chiawa wanted to upgrade it after the end of the war in Rhodesia in 1980 since then there have been a number of wasted efforts to upgrade. This road was mined during the war and I understand someone a couple of years ago saw a mine that had washed out after the rains.
frkeder (2019-03-25 14:37:17+00:00): Clearly you know better than I do so thanks for the update, and for the mini history lesson. What do people call this road? And yes, I did see a photo on a mobile phone of a mine a few years ago.
Alouette955 (2019-02-28 15:28:28+00:00): La segmentation du chemin autour du terminus Montmorency n'a pas conservé l'appartenance aux relations de bus 8N et 9N de EXO de tous les segments. Faire attention aux relations existantes. La segmentation des chemins dans JOSM ou Potlatch conserve normalement ces appartenances.
Alouette955 (2019-02-28 15:37:38+00:00): IDEM pour création de la 65N qui a brisé la relation 11N de exo entre Des-Oiseaux et Roi-du-Nord sur Labelle. Voir OSM Inspector, View Public Transport - Routes pour constater les bris.
phidauex (2019-03-02 01:49:43+00:00): Hi, noticed your updates to these old arroyo roads. A useful tag is "highway=track" along with tracktype= and smoothness=. The tracktype and smoothness tags let you indicate how soft the material is, and what type of vehicle would be needed to traverse it.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tracktype
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67605034
dennisramadhan (2019-03-12 04:08:45+00:00): I changed Way 437489843 from unclassified to residential and combined the road. how about that?
Supaplex (2019-02-28 03:48:00+00:00): 不好意思，你加的很多新餐廳或是景點都沒有名字，能否加上去吧?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67605293
Supaplex (2019-02-28 09:54:03+00:00): 抱歉，您誤把個人地點書籤發布到公眾使用的開放街圖資料庫中了！如果您想要紀錄某個私人的地點，請使用「加入書籤」功能，而非「新增一個地點」。「新增一個地點」會直接反饋到公開圖資中。

Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。Maps.me 與開放街圖合作，讓地圖使用者可以回饋最新的路況與地點資料到開放街圖社群，在下一次更新的時候，就會自動發布到所有人的手機系統上。

以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。
編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67605293
ebraplmap (2019-05-08 17:53:23+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for helping to improve the map data. Please read this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:covered
According to that page, using the tag combination of
tunnel=yes
&
layer=-1
is not correct for this situation, please:
-Delete the above tag combinations on way 532565400 & way 239465119
- Split way 532565400 & way 239465119 up to the points that is covered by the building
- Apply covered=yes to the covered parts of way 532565400 & way 239465119
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about above suggestions.
Thank you,
Isaac Nickaein (2019-05-13 08:24:35+00:00): Thanks for the tip. I fixed it in changeset #70181354
Glassman (2019-02-27 06:46:41+00:00): Did you mean to remove the building tag from the bakery? From the imagery - it looks like the building is still there. To fix all you need to do is add the tag building=yes or better building=retail. Let me know if you need help.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67605501
Glassman (2019-02-27 06:48:25+00:00): Does the pharmacy in Safeway have a pharmacist? If you it should be dispensing=yes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67605501
Omnific (2019-02-27 18:03:16+00:00): I fixed both of these issues.
coshiro1 (2019-02-27 18:07:24+00:00): Glassman, yes, I think it was an accident. Sorry, I'm a bit new to this so I may make a few mistakes before I can do it well.
Glassman (2019-02-27 18:35:39+00:00): Not to worry - we all make mistakes. I'm constantly referring to the wiki for help. Just keep on mapping what you enjoy.
Omnific (2019-02-28 00:24:06+00:00): Indeed, I know I made much worse mistakes when I started, but the community was always there to help.
Supaplex (2019-03-01 12:21:07+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
muralito (2020-09-24 00:47:05+00:00): Hi. You "fix" for the Historic Quarter of the City of Colonia del Sacramento is wrong. The admin_level is 1, not 8, beacause is world heritage.
eggie (2019-02-27 08:39:51+00:00): Dag joegei... Het beste kun je geen landuse op landuse mappen. Dus beter dat Farmland er netje omheen leggen. Dat kun je gerust aanpassen, want van het oorspronkelijke farmland klopt niet veel meer. 
Wanneer je een stuk landuse in ander landuse wilt leggen kun je ook een multipolygoon aanmaken. De boomgaard wordt dan de inner en het Farmland de outer.
Dit gaat het beste met editor JOSM.
Een aanrader.. editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710  

Gr Eggie
Sylvain M (2019-03-13 21:01:04+00:00): Salut Porphyrion,
Je vois que ce changeset a créé cette relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9358119 (natural=water) qui doit être en erreur : je te laisse corriger ?
A+
Sylvain
biker-2 (2019-03-11 06:45:46+00:00): Hallo Ulmtuelp,

vor ca. einem Jahr habe ich eine Straße bei Platja de Muro "Avinguda de S`Albufeira" in Höhe Carrer Juia entfernt. Diese wurde damals, als ich dort vor Ort war, gerade in einen Bürgersteig umgebaut.

Kann es sein, dass du die Straße auf dieser Höhe wieder eingetragen hast?

Woher hast du diese Information?

Ich werde ab nächster Woche wieder vor Ort sein, und mal schauen...

Grüsse, biker-2
ulmtuelp (2019-03-11 07:52:50+00:00): Hallo Biker,
ich habe dort eine paar Fehler in der Geometrie bereinigt, möglicherweise habe ich dabei einen Tag falsch gesetzt. Bitte korrigieren, danke! Gruß UT
biker-2 (2019-03-11 18:15:42+00:00): es wäre sehr nett, wenn du demnächst etwas präziser arbeitest. Dein Changeset erstreckt sich über ganz Spanien! 
Hast du hier etwas automatisch eingelesen? 
Es ist echt schade, dass ich jetzt dort alles wieder reparieren muss.
flohoff (2019-02-27 10:02:51+00:00): Moin,
in diesem changeset hast du zwar die Tags des Pizza Service entfernt - den node ohne tags aber nicht.

Ich habe den mal entsorgt.

Und - Ach ja - Auf dem Gebäudeoutline war der Name auch nochmal drauf - Das habe ich auch entsorgt.

Flo
slauxtermann (2019-02-27 11:03:46+00:00): An der Portastraße 52 ist jetzt ein Wettbüro Tipico.
Bevor ich da was falsch mache ... wie füge ich das hinzu oder machst du das?
https://www.owl-sportwetten.com/porta-westfalica-neu