piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk (2021-05-17 11:22:35+00:00): Hi ottwiz,
Is the source data authorized for use with OSM?
Please check it!
The DWG got some questions about it.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright/en

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
ottwiz (2021-05-17 11:33:50+00:00): Yes, I know about the issue, i might revert the thing,   because actually there are 3-4 changesets affected by this. The WV GIS TC told something to wolfgang8741 that "everything can be used of WV GIS Clearinghouse to OSM (public domain), unless explicitly stated". The problem is, that on WV GIS TC there is a declaration "imagery web service is for view only", but why don't they just grant permission? It is weird, because the Clearinghouse has the purpose to reuse something. Actually, this question is on rise on OSMUS Slack, but we haven't gotten any reply back from wolfgang8741 on the issue, because he spoke last time with Kurt Donaldson and Frank LaFone.
The problem is, that they didn't explicitly stated the stuff.

Because you warned me (also DUGA warned me), i think i have to revert the stuff which contains the "WV GIS TC Imagery" like this changeset, and if any of the WVU members grant permission only for OSM mappers to trace their imagery, then the stuff i could not trace from NAIP/Maxar/Bing/Esri will be corrected.

I hope this clarification is good.
ottwiz (2021-05-17 11:34:16+00:00): "wolfgang8741 on the issue, because he spoke last time with Kurt Donaldson and Frank LaFone. " Actually that was back in October 2020
ottwiz (2021-05-17 11:47:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104726989
the JOSM reverter doesn't work correctly for the changeset in this particular case, so i couldn't revert that particular one. If you can, please do that, i don't want to overwrite anything.
mariotomo (2021-05-14 16:36:59+00:00): hola, quieres revisar si está mejor con mi edición https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/104697119?  y será que tienes la oportunidad de subir trazas GPS?
BCNorwich (2021-05-14 06:38:50+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just a couple of points I've noticed. The building is drawn and tagged as The Yellow house, thus your new information should go on the building. Mapping a new POI as The Yellow House is making duplication of data.

Secondly, in 2019 the building was tagged with disused:amenity=pub
note=Boarded up  Is this information now incorrect, if so it should be amended.

Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.
Theyellow (2021-05-14 09:42:22+00:00): Thanks. The yellow house is not boarded up! They are fabricated decorative yellow metal shutters that are closed during the daytime for security reasons and open when The yellow house usually opens in the evenings - this can be verified easilly online. The reason I was perusaded to make changes was because of a note on Instagram which directed me to OpenStreetMap. I can't attach screenshots here so please search for "The yellow house" as a place and also "The yellow house Jazz Night" - no details on the first (primary place) and a detailed map on the second and secondary place at the same venue. If the changes I made are unncessary how can this place map difference on IG be fixed? Thanks.
BCNorwich (2021-05-14 12:50:21+00:00): Hi, all tagged information is now on the building outline including opening hours. I've removed the disused:amenity=pub and the note that the place is boarded up. The place should now appear properly on maps and Instagram.

Regards Bernard.
Theyellow (2021-05-14 13:41:21+00:00): Thanks Bernard, but map for The yellow house (place) on Instagram is still showing the white blob for the whole of London - i.e. not the same location detail as for The yellow house jazz nights (place) - which was the issue I was trying to fix.
BCNorwich (2021-05-14 16:01:49+00:00): I don't use Instagram so can't comment on that. The data in OSM is correct so the problem must be with Instagram. Do you know how often Instagram updates its map data? The problem might be resolved when the data is updated.

Regards Bernard.
Theyellow (2021-05-14 17:34:01+00:00): Hi, there's a little i (for info) on the Instagram place map which when clicked brings up the option to "Report a problem with the map"... when clicked it jumps to this page:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/fixthemap with the heading "Report a problem / Fix the map" and not to an Instagram support page. This suggests the problem still needs to be fixed by OpenStreetMap as the map is not correct. I'm happy to wait until tomorrow to check if it is fixed overnight, but if it isn't then it is unliley to correct itself.... are you suggesting (despite the information above) that I should find a way to report this problem to Instagram?
BCNorwich (2021-05-14 19:15:48+00:00): Hi, I've installed an android emulator on my PC and managed to get Instagram on that. I searched for The Yellow House, Lower Road, London. Instagram loads a page titled "The yellow house Jazz Nights" there's a map with a red pointer in the right place near Surrey Quays. I'm not able to zoom in on that map though. The "little i" is for reporting a problem but I can see no problem to report.

What is the problem that you want to fix or report?

I don't think I can help anymore. The data in OSM is definitely to OSM practice though.

Regards Bernard.
Theyellow (2021-05-14 20:32:16+00:00): Thanks for looking into this again. I've now sent an email with ref: Changeset: 104662630 to data@openstreetmap.org and attached two screenshots of the two Instagram places to illustrate the problem - one for "The yellow house Jazz Nights" which you have noted is ok and one for "The yellow house" (place) which is not showing our location - just a large white shape of the whole of London. Both places are at the same venue at 126 Lower Road SE16 2UE. Hopefully someone will respond to my email. All the best, Robert.
woodpeck (2021-05-14 22:37:48+00:00): Received as DWG Ticket#2021051410000148 but the response clearly is: contact Instagram.
BCNorwich (2021-05-15 07:36:47+00:00): Hi Robert, "The yellow house" (place). I take it you mean is a feature/object tagged with place=???
This feature which you refer to does not exist in OSM. Instagram is trying to help your search

If you search Instagram for "The yellow house" you can get the big white blob. You have to be a bit more precise with your search, add restaurant, jazz, lower road london then your search will bring up the features you want.

After a short play with Instagram I'm of the opinion it's not worth the hassle. Much better to search with OpenStreetMap.

Regards Bernard.
yrtimiD (2021-05-15 11:36:35+00:00): Hi and welcome! What is this number "15177"? Is it just a bus stop number from the sign? If yes - then please remove addr:housenumber tag - it's only for addresses.
also, osm doesn't have "number" tag. 
If you unsure about specific tagging - please check in wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
or feel free to ask community on OSM_Israel telegram group.
mapsamillion78 (2021-07-15 06:32:43+00:00): Hi there, I noticed from image searches that there is large signage for "Mount Riverview Anglican Church" on the corner of Rusden and Bunbinla Ave. Is this signage still there? If so and correct, please add a [alt_name] tag. If not, please ignore this comment. Thanks.
Reemuson (2021-05-18 13:50:27+00:00): Hello, the addition of extra tags is incorrect. The buildings are mapped with sub-buildings for detail. The tags of the building are included in the outer area, the sub-buildings should only include level, height, roof and other structural data, not names or address data.
Reemuson (2021-05-18 13:54:40+00:00): These changes should be rolled back, if you give confirmation I will do this for you. I have been slowly mapping the buildings of the UON campus according to the rules and guidelines layed out by the wiki, the changes you have made are contrary to these.
SherbetS (2021-05-31 00:55:42+00:00): Hello, 

I've noticed that you used the tag man_made=communications_tower 
to tag this lattice mast. JOSM makes this preset confusing, but the correct scheme is to use man_made=mast in combination with tower:type=communication to tag these structures.
DoaJC_Blogger (2021-05-31 01:50:00+00:00): Okay, thanks SherbetS.
wislander (2021-05-14 01:46:07+00:00): Not a revert, that tag is from my previous changeset.
wislander (2021-05-14 01:46:24+00:00): Not a revert, that tag is left over from 2 changesets ago.
Warin61 (2021-05-16 13:03:28+00:00): The relation for the section of hipped roof .. the tags go on the relation not on the outer way .. 
I have fixed this.
btwhite92 (2021-05-20 02:10:03+00:00): Hello,
This stretch of Pacific Highway does not meet standards for 'motorway' use. This is an expressway, with sidewalks, bike lanes, direct access to a limited number of properties, and with "Freeway Entrance" signage not beginning until the ramps connection with I-5. Just a heads up that I will be reverting this back to 'trunk' accordingly.

Bradley
ALLstarGUY (2021-06-21 02:03:28+00:00): The stretch of roadway in question WAS the freeway U.S. 101 before Interstate 5 was constructed.   There is fenced (restricted access) along this stretch of the U.S. 101 historic right of way, NO cross traffic NOR traffic signals, ALL junctions are grade separated with ramps (or cloverleaf) interchange.    Pedestrians are prohibited.   The sidewalks and bike lanes you refer to are on the frontage roads (which are only located along motorways)
btwhite92 (2021-06-21 04:21:12+00:00): Along the portion you tagged 'motorway' in this changeset, from west to east, there are:

- high quality sidewalks on both sides of the highway until Witherby St. & Couts St. turnoffs on south and north side of the highway respectively (aside from Barnett underpass).

- bus stops at Witherby and Veterans Village

- no 'pedestrians prohibited' signs afterwards (nor anywhere else on this highway and associated on/off ramps as far as I could find)

- bike lanes on the highway connecting from Barnett through to Washington via on/off ramps (NB ending after RIRO with Couts St)

- sidewalks and bike lanes returning as the highway continues past I-5 on/off ramps after Washington overpass

- roadside parking and direct access to parking lots NB just after Sassafras

I would argue the only section of this road that could be called a 'motorway' is the short piece just after the western ramps connecting with Washington to the I-5 on/off ramps, but it would be silly to tag something that short as 'motorway', especially when the on ramp to I-5 is signed with a 'Freeway Entrance' sign, indicating that the DOT apparently does not consider this portion of the Pacific Hwy to be a freeway. 

San Diego appears to have many freeway-like roads (Sea World interchanges, Friars Rd), including a handful of decommissioned "freeways" like this one (Kearny Villa Rd./Old Us 395). However, it also has a robust, continuous network of high standard interstate and state freeways that do not have sidewalks, bike lanes, bus stops, and on-street parking interspersed - which makes it fair to say that any roadway that has these things cannot be in the same 'motorway' category. These "in-between" roads are generally tagged as 'trunk' in the US.

Bradley
ElliottPlack (2021-05-14 13:34:49+00:00): What was removed here?
marczoutendijk (2021-05-14 15:01:02+00:00): Hi boopington, 
your changeset comments are rather vague. What did you remove? What did you realign? What is the meaning of "rail"
In the past we (the DWG) have asked you before to give more details in your comments. 
Please read this, to learn why: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments.
See this list to check all your edits and the questions others have asked you about: 
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=8649216

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
alester (2021-05-14 16:23:46+00:00): Whoops, that was an embarrassing spelling mistake. Thanks for fixing that!
JJIglesias (2021-05-14 06:33:04+00:00): Sugeriria q revisen que fue lo q hicieron con la Avenida Republica de Francia, NO esta conectada y ademas de eso aparece como paralela a otra avenida adyacente a menos de 1 metro. Si no se esta claro q es lo q se esta haciendo, Mejor NO editar sin previamente consultar
5m4u9 (2021-05-17 05:11:02+00:00): JJ, Alejandro conversó conmigo y me comentó de las modificaciones, yo pensé que ésa vía quitada existía porque vi mal una foto que me mostraron, Ale me mostró otra foto que efectivamente no tiene.

Ya corregí los nodos desconectados, y actualicé el lugar con las nuevas imagenes de esri, ahora parece que está bien
JJIglesias (2021-05-17 06:28:10+00:00): No hay problema, Gracias
lasagna (2021-05-20 02:03:51+00:00): Hello,

I am concerned that your changes to the names of several major roads in this area, as well as adding the "US 101" ref to roads south of Los Angeles, may not accurately represent the current names and designations of these roads as reflected on road signs and official records.

Please provide a source for these name and ref changes.

We have been through this before with your renaming of Genesee Avenue and North Torrey Pines Road starting in changeset 96193476, which you never justified. 

Thanks
ALLstarGUY (2021-06-21 02:16:44+00:00): i explained the historical and present significance and  Identification of the original route of U.S. 101 for interpretation and tourism  purposes.   There is significant interest in the route of this highway, and it is a disservice to the traveling and commuting motorists to obscure or conceal the route
lasagna (2021-06-25 02:15:50+00:00): The route relation ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12046962 ) already provides a good representation of the historic 101 route.
For the names of roads, we need to match the present-day road signs that people use to navigate. The Pacific Coast Highway name would be appropriate for the old_name tag, but not as the primary name.
lasagna (2021-05-23 17:54:35+00:00): Hello,

I see that you have changed the name of SR 56 from "Ted Williams Freeway" to "Torrey Pines Freeway." Please provide a source establishing that the name of the freeway has changed.

If you do not respond within 7 days, I will be forced to assume that you are not editing in good faith.

Thanks
ALLstarGUY (2021-06-21 01:51:59+00:00): I stand by my  edits to the California 56 Freeway.   As a matter or principle and practice, freeways in California are assigned PRIMARY names  by GEOGRAPHIC REFERENCE based upon a city, landform or historic feature that the route passes through.  This precedent was set in order to assist motorists in navigation to their destination on freeways and are intended to transcend time.   Identification of freeways based upon prominent landmarks (versus route #'s) helps distinguish one freeway from another and also results in successful broadcast, delivery and interpretation of traffic reports.   We all have heroes and role models, and I assume that yours was Ted Williams.  But naming a freeway after person that was famous at one time, does not assist motorists and that is why FREEWAYS ARE NEVER NAMED AFTER PEOPLE.  Caltrans has many types of secondary, parochial, ceremonial and historical names that are designated to a segment or milemarker for celebratory or memorial        purposes.   ie:  Jacob Dekema Freeway, Officer John Doe Memorial Fwy, Packard Memorial Parkway, Kumeyaay Highway, Vietnam Veterans Memorial Highway, Tony Gwynn Memorial Freeway.   The City of San Diego took action to rename the road at the eastern terminus of California 56 Freeway to Ted Williams Pkwy.   However the City does not have authority to name a state highway, and freeways in California do not carry the name of connecting roadways.   Could you identify where "Officer Zeppatella Memorial Freeway" is?   I rest my case.
lasagna (2021-06-22 04:48:20+00:00): Thank you for responding.
I will admit that I haven't seen any road signs that refer to this freeway as the Ted Williams Freeway, or any name other than "56."
However, many websites refer to the freeway as the Ted Williams Freeway. That is only a weak justification for putting the name in OpenStreetMap, but I don't understand why we should change the name to something else.

Are there road signs or some other source to show that people are calling this freeway the Torrey Pines Freeway?
lasagna (2021-07-05 02:27:12+00:00): I found a solid source confirming that this freeway is named the Ted Williams Freeway: Assembly Concurrent Resolution 21, in resolution chapter 24 from the 1993 session of the California state assembly.
See page 1507 of this PDF: https://clerk.assembly.ca.gov/sites/clerk.assembly.ca.gov/files/archive/Statutes/1993/1993_Stats_vol4.pdf#page=1507

Unless you have something official that is more recent, I will change the name back.
JriSv250 (2021-05-14 21:53:55+00:00): Please limit the geographic range of your changesets.
marczoutendijk (2022-01-01 16:40:53+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/688673876
Hoi Lachgast,
payment:museumkaart wordt veel gebruikt, maar waarom voeg je ook nog museumkaart=yes toe. Die tag wordt wereldwijd één keer gebruikt (door jou) en voegt volgens mij niets toe. 
Groetjes en mooi 2022!
Marc.
Lachgast (2022-01-01 20:29:10+00:00): Hoi Marczoutendijk!
Jij ook een mooi 2022 gewenst!
Ik moet deze sleutel over het hoofd hebben gezien. Ik heb payment:museumkaart indertijd toegevoegd n.a.v. een discussie op het forum. Als je in de geschiedenis kijkt, zie je dat ik die sleutel niet heb toegevoegd, maar dat deze is toegevoegd is door wvdp ver vóór deze discussie. Overigens kan het zijn dat er op dat moment nog onduidelijkheid was over het handhaven van museumkaart=yes, en ik het daarom niet heb weggehaald. Maar dat durf ik niet te zeggen op basis van mijn feilbare geheugen.

Dus je mag deze unieke sleutel wat mij betreft omsmelten tot iets nuttigs!

groet!
Lachgast
datbrahm (2021-05-14 05:04:23+00:00): Hi,

We have added access:delivery=no on the gate in this changeset; based on the Driver Feedback. If you are local or are going to survey this location. Kindly make the appropriate changes.

Regards,
Brahm
mueschel (2021-05-15 14:05:08+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM!

Please don't use tags like 'hospital id'.  ID numbers are given using the 'ref' tag.
deepikja (2021-05-18 09:01:04+00:00): Hi,
I see that there is a yellow line and lane markings on the road https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124479078 indicating it to be bi-directional based on the latest aerial imagery, request you to please confirm if there are new developments in the area based on which the entire road can be marked one way or it is bi-directional. Let us know we would be happy to make the necessary changes. 
Regards,
Deepikja
ALLstarGUY (2021-06-21 02:37:47+00:00): I never intended to make any changes to roadway direction here.   I stand corrected
lasagna (2021-06-22 04:59:22+00:00): Hello,
I see that you have changed the name of this road to Torrey Pines Highway.
However, all the street signs that I can see in Bing Streetside imagery and that I remember from visiting the area still say "Carmel Valley Road."
Have you surveyed this road and found that the street signs have changed, or do you have another source for the name change?
user_5359 (2021-05-15 15:38:04+00:00): Welcome to OSM! What ist meaning of hospital id? Why did you add the hospital twice (as area and node)? Please use mixcased characters for the name value.
What is the source of his information?
Jrachi (2021-05-15 14:49:48+00:00): Perché hai troncato il percorso 224A?
Jrachi (2021-05-15 15:00:05+00:00): E non solo ma hai stravolto tutte le tracce che andavano sulla Ciamarella lasciando solo una che hai creato tu e passa nelle zone di crepacci!
Posso chiederti su quali basi dati hai fatto queste modifiche?
All'interno di un changeset commentato con "Standardizzazione dei rifugi" dove hai aggiunto delle cose in francese non so fino a che punto utili...
Ti prego di ripristinare quello che c'era prima o procedo con un revert.
Hervé TUC (2021-05-15 16:07:10+00:00): Ho usato Strava per tracciare i percorsi.
Non sono a casa, potrò guardarlo lunedì e sistemare il percorso 224.
Quali immagini usa per tracciare i percorsi?

Tradotto con Deepl
Jrachi (2021-05-15 16:44:06+00:00): Devi risistemare il 224A e tutte le varianti inserite.
Non credo che i runner che usano strava siano da considerare affidabili in zone come quella.
Le tracce che esistevano erano frutto di rilevamenti ufficiali con gps e correzioni fatte di persona con diversi passaggi, sempre con gps.
E se vuoi fare modifiche così drastiche ti consiglio di andarci di persona, di fare attenzione alle relazioni, e magari di avvisare l'user.
Grazie.
Hervé TUC (2021-05-17 03:31:45+00:00): Posso sistemare la relazione 224A e spostare i sentieri in base alle tracce gps caricate su OSM; ma non so esattamente dove vanno i sentieri 224 e 224A.
Pensi che sia la cosa migliore da fare? O sarebbe più efficiente fare un revert? Ma non so come fare un revert
Hervé TUC (2021-05-17 09:01:32+00:00): Ho corretto i miei errori e ho riparato le relazioni 224 e 224A; usando OSM History Viewer.
Spero che ora vada tutto bene.
Tradotto con Deepl
Jrachi (2021-05-17 10:32:02+00:00): Dovrò verificare la traccia che hai inserito con i dati di Strava.
A occhio credo sia una vecchia traccia poco usata per via del terreno ghiaioso instabile.
Comunque sembra hai rimesso le cose a posto.
Grazie.
Jakka (2021-05-14 16:32:50+00:00): Het toevoegen van gebouwen, gebruik de laag AIV grb om de correcte omtrek van al de gebouwen in te tekenen. Voeg huisnr en straat er aan vast op de omtrek. I
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/104669436
eggie (2021-05-16 06:59:44+00:00): Fons, 
Wellicht ook hier weer onbewust schade veroorzaakt. 

Je kunt zonder kennis niet de rijbanen verdubbelen als er relaties op lopen... Vraag svp even hulp op het forum hoe zoiets te doen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

Het lijkt zo simpel, maar dat is het niet.
Je kunt niet verwachten dat andere mappers steeds maar weer de schade herstellen. 
Eggie
flohoff (2021-05-14 10:39:30+00:00): Moin,
die nasen da hinten an den Gebäuden waren schon so aus dem ALKIS übernommen. Existieren die nicht?

Flo
kartonage (2021-05-14 11:33:25+00:00): Hej,

solche Nasen kommen in vielen ALKIS-Daten vor und sind in der Regel nicht nachvollziehbar. Ich empfehle nicht einfach Daten aus ALKIS als absolute Wahrheit zu übernehmen. Es sind in keinen der vorhanden Luftbilder Nasen zu erkennen. Hauptaugenmerk lag hier aber auf der nicht vorhanden Verbindung zwischen den Gebäuden am Südende. Kleine Anpassungen passieren da immer nur am Rande, wenn du dir mit den Nasen sicher bist, können die auch gerne wieder zurück.

Beste Grüße
flohoff (2021-05-14 12:03:12+00:00): Es geht mir nicht darum das das ALKIS die Wahrheit ist. Die Gebäude in Gütersloh und Umgebung stammen nur daher. Und wenn wir etwas ändern/simplifizieren/löschen sollten wir bessere Daten haben als das was im ALKIS ist.

Deshalb frage ich dich was deine Datengrundlage ist? Warst du vor Ort und hast dir das angesehen oder war das willkür? Wenn du keine bessere informationen als das ALKIS hast bin ich dagegen willkürlich irgendwas zu ändern oder zu löschen.

Typischerweise ist das ALKIS ziemlich gut und wenn wir davon abweichen dann sollten wir als note auf den Gebäuden hinterlassen warum. 

Flo
kartonage (2021-05-14 12:28:23+00:00): Also wenn Luftbilder neuerdings als Willkür gelten sollen, dann lass ich dir hier die exakte Datenkopie aus dem ALKIS. Habe mir vorbehalten den offensichtlichen Qualitätsfehler der unverbundenen Wände trotzdem zu beheben.
skyper (2021-05-15 10:37:37+00:00): Hallo Andy
Woher hast Du die Informationen, dass es sich hier um einen Kreisverkehr ohne befahrbare Insel handelt? Von den Bing-Bildern wohl kaum. Siehe auch:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2115783

Zu dem hat deine Änderung jede Menge PTv2-Relationen kaputt gemacht.

Plädiere daher für einen umgehenden Revert.

Fragende Grüße,
skyper
skyper (2021-05-20 15:47:06+00:00): Nachdem ich auch auf meine PM keine Rückmeldung erhalten habe, habe ich diesen CS zurückgesetzt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/105038707
ottwiz (2021-05-17 12:06:00+00:00): Reverted.