piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2015-08-11 13:16:08+00:00): Hi - just wondered if the defibrillator here was in the right place?  Perhaps it needs nudging a bit northeast so that it's in the station itself rather than between the station and one of the rail lines?

In case you're wondering why it doesn't appear on the "standard" map, there's a bit of info about that here:

https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1603
rohieb (2015-05-04 00:49:36+00:00): Hey hey, first, thanks for your work identifying buildings, but it would be nice if you could tag them as building=yes, not as area=yes, so they show up on the map.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-11-06 15:22:34+00:00): Hi. You added a GAA pitch here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342283498 ). But you put sport=soccer. Which can't be right! Is it gaelic football or hurling? If it's both you can put sport=gaelic_games
Endres Pelka (2015-05-04 17:29:19+00:00): Dlaczego oznaczasz przypadkowy punkt jako place=city?
Walerianczyk (2015-05-05 05:07:41+00:00): Witam,dzięki za uwagę.Poprawię to,powodem błędu była przeglądarka IE,edytor w niej jest bardzo uproszczony,zmienilem ją i teraz o wiele przejżyściej można pracować,daj znać jeśli jeszcze coś znajdziesz nieprawidłowego ,serdecznie pozdrawiam Krzysztof.
Walerianczyk (2015-05-05 05:37:53+00:00): Sprawdzałem ten odcinek przed chwilą,nic tam takiego nie nanosiłem.
Endres Pelka (2015-05-05 14:27:19+00:00): Nic takiego nie widać, bo już poprawiłem :)
BeKri (2015-05-09 01:31:00+00:00): Hallo,
darf ich fragen, warum Du beim Wertstoffhof plus Langwied das building=roof rausgenommen hast ?
Wenn Du nach Bildern googelst wirst Du sehen, dass die gesamte Konstruktion ein Dach ist (bei dem im Winter die Eisplatten runterfallen= Sperrung ;-)
AndreasTUHU (2015-05-03 09:18:29+00:00): Szia!
Nem kell megszakítani az utat, elég ha teszel egy barrier=bollard címkét a pontra.
András
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:barrier%3Dbollard
Александр Белов (2015-05-02 13:10:44+00:00): Дорогу сделали проездной
flaimo (2015-05-03 19:26:20+00:00): surface=grass (+ eventuell ein layer=1 wenn es am dach ist) wäre vermutlich besser, weil es darunter schon einen gesetzten landuse für das einkaufszentrum gibt.
0leg-ch (2015-05-03 07:45:33+00:00): Александр, а зачем надо было удалять улицу Плеханова?
Александр Белов (2015-05-04 16:58:13+00:00): Её по факту на данный момент нет, там только трампути и дворовый проезд с боку.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-31 14:11:32+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I think that something has gone a bit wrong with http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342284323 - it doesn't join at either end or in the middle, so routers won't be able to send any traffic up it.
Skippern (2015-05-02 17:35:02+00:00): Favor nao mapear areas com trafica de drogas como "landuse=commercial", fora do aviso do perigo com trafico não queremos este informação no banco de dados. Eu deixei um ponto com "hazard=Trafico do Drogas" no local.
naoliv (2015-05-02 17:36:58+00:00): Gomez, esse tipo de mapeamento não deve ser feito e nem inserido no mapa.
Skippern (2015-05-02 17:48:56+00:00): Corregido: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30727343
Hiddenhausener (2015-05-02 18:22:26+00:00): 10.01.2015 ist richtig
mohool (2015-05-02 16:30:56+00:00): I numeri civici di questa zona sono effettivamente caotici e irregolari.
maxerickson (2015-05-06 00:00:10+00:00): Hi-

In this changeset:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30826815

I have removed tag values like "building=yes" from the name key of ways that you have edited.

For example, version 1 of this way has the "building=yes" value :

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342340344/history

If you decide to do some more edits, if an item doesn't have a name or you don't know the name, it's fine to just leave the name field blank.

If you have any questions, feel free to reply here or send me a message using the "send message link" on my OSM user profile: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/maxerickson/

Thanks,

Max
Borut@OSM (2015-05-06 22:17:57+00:00): Hi Severin! 

Regarding http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342372009

bridge=simple_brunnel was intended to be used exclusively on a single shared node (a crossing of a waterway and a highway) - not on a way. You may wish to look at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Simple_one_node_bridge

Good luck and best wishes.
Borut
maraf24 (2015-05-09 21:43:42+00:00): Nie ma takiego sklepu jak "Biedronka i Hebe" ;)
Hebe powinno być jako osobny węzeł, z własnym typem sklepu.
kaltuna (2020-09-24 04:53:03+00:00): Hallo, schaust Du dir bitte mal folgenden Hinweismarker an ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2323720
Zuletzt wurde in diesem Changeset die Geschwindigkeit angepasst/eingetragen. Vielleicht kannst Du zur Lösung beitragen ? Viele Grüße
bigbug21 (2020-09-24 06:41:23+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ein schönes Teamspiel!
zimba (2015-05-02 20:33:14+00:00): Mapping fuer den router? Vor der aenderung hat das meiner meinung nach sehr viel besser den wahren gegebenheiten entsprochen.
Hjart (2015-05-05 07:12:20+00:00): Geodatastyrelsens fotos er generelt lidt mere akkurate end Bings.
Vær også opmærksom på at du kan gøre huse retvinklede ved hjælp af genvejstasten S.
Hvis du har planer om at tegne større antal bygninger er der funktioner i JOSM der gør det meget lettere.
Hjart (2015-05-05 07:14:17+00:00): Bemærk også at der er en dansk OSM postliste http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
SomeoneElse (2015-05-04 09:36:41+00:00): You appear to have removed "tracks=3" from http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/310146771/history .  Was that discussd anywhere so that people who might have been using that information were made aware of it?
flierfy (2015-05-04 10:53:38+00:00): I wasn't discussed of course. Why should it? The mapping of each individual track makes the tracks-tag obsolete. Let alone that a value of 3 for an individual track is simply wrong.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-04 21:05:45+00:00): My apologies - I hadn't spotted that there the lines ahd already been split out (actually into 4, not 3 - so actually passenger_lines=3 is potentially questionable, assuming that one line isn't reserved for freight there).
_Mathieu_ (2015-05-03 11:49:08+00:00): Je ne sais pas ce que tu voulais faire, mais tu as renommé Crouy sur Ourcq en Porte de Clichy ;)
Jan Online (2019-01-31 13:44:08+00:00): Hi there, I was wondering to what extent it's a good idea to mark wild camping spots as "camp ground" (or at all actually) on OSM. I've seen those all along the silk road b/w Uzbekistan and China and while they may be useful for some overland travellers (especially cyclists such as myself), they also draw people to specific spots that are often on private land -- and definitely no camp grounds.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-03 11:41:46+00:00): What's the access here?  Is parking restricted to customers of the Bowl Center, other local businesses, or genuinely free for anyone?
TZorn (2017-03-21 17:09:58+00:00): Hallo Ohligser. Das ist schon ein etwas älterer Änderungssatz, aber ich stoße gerade auf seltsam kartierte Ampeln und Übergänge auf der Rathenaustraße in Leverkusen. Dabei ist mir dann aufgefallen, dass du einen Teil dieser Straße mit diesem Änderungssatz in getrennte Ways für die beiden Richtungen aufgeteilt hast (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342387536). Das macht für mich überhaupt keinen Sinn, da es in diesem Abschnitt keine bauliche Trennung gibt und an manchen Stellen noch nicht mal eine Mittellinie existiert. Hatte das irgendeinen Grund, den ich nicht erkenne? Wegen der vielen Busrouten lässt der Way sich aber auch nicht mal schnell wieder löschen.
ohligser (2017-03-21 22:01:11+00:00): Hallo,
ich war's nicht!
(siehe auch: Fixme an Node 275636204)

Im Ernst: Sehe das genauso wie Du.
Die kartierte Pseudo-Trennung fand ich schon so vor, habe i.W. den Westteil verbessert und etliche Tags ergänzt. Da LEV aber nur Gelegenheits-Mappinggebiet von mir ist, habe ich die Teilung im kritisierten Teil nicht ausgebaut. Wäre aber sicher angemessen.
Schönen Gruß
ohligser
TZorn (2017-03-22 09:55:37+00:00): Oh, hatte dich als Ersteller dieser Linie ausgemacht. Dann hattest du die bestehende vielleicht nur getrennt. Mea culpa.

Aber gut, dass du es auch so siehst. Werd ich in nächster Zeit mal versuchen zu korrigieren. Danke für die Rückmeldung.
grin (2015-05-03 07:24:27+00:00): Danke fuer den Edit! ;-)
jremillard (2015-05-03 01:34:28+00:00): Hi, Is this a public trail. Is on private property? Should it be access=private?
emacsen_dwg (2015-05-03 16:08:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30750726 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed building import
emacsen (2015-05-03 14:15:36+00:00): This appears to be an import. I don't see discussion of it as per the import guidelines. If I am wrong and there has been a discussion, please reply back to this changeset ASAP so we can resolve this.

If I don't hear anything soon, I will need to revert this changeset.
MeghaShrestha (2015-05-03 14:38:11+00:00): As you know there is an earthquake in Nepal and we need this data right now. Can you wait to revert the change set for few days? This is for temporary basis and will revert the changeset after its use is complete.
emacsen (2015-05-03 14:42:42+00:00): The fact that there is an earthquake doesn't change the fact that we, as a community, have not had the opportunity to vet this import. We have already had complaints about how it's been disruptive to the emergency mapping.

Will you revert it (and the other import changesets?
MeghaShrestha (2015-05-03 14:52:48+00:00): Yes I will invert the changeset but give me 5 more days. If I dont by then you can revert the changeset.
emacsen (2015-05-03 14:53:58+00:00): This import is harming the emergency mapping efforts in Nepal. Reverting.
jc86035 (2015-05-03 09:05:09+00:00): Stop it. 停止。
You're not helping by continually changing highway=trunk to highway=motorway. That's not how it works.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrunk
jc86035 (2015-05-03 09:16:27+00:00): There is a difference. Tag roads with highway=motorway and highway=motorway_link only where the highway signs are green.
兩個（highway=motorway和highway=trunk）不是一樣的。只用highway=motorway和highway=motorway_link如果路上的路標是綠色。
jc86035 (2015-05-03 10:11:08+00:00): (Tunnels and tunnel areas are also tagged as highway=motorway.)
jc86035 (2015-05-03 10:20:49+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HK:Hong_Kong_tagging#.E8.A1.97.E9.81.93.E5.88.86.E9.A1.9E_Classifications_of_streets
aceman444 (2015-05-03 13:35:46+00:00): Hi, thanks for improving High Tatras!
But why does way 342445363 have "covered=yes". Is it under a roof or inside a building? That doesn't look correct.
JakubMap (2015-05-04 08:19:40+00:00): I know. Just on Wikipedia it says enigmatically about the use of covered and layer.
I checked first covered, but not worked. I changed to the layer. I hope it works well.
JakubMap (2015-05-04 08:28:03+00:00): In this way (layer -1), would do well to fill a large area of the Western Tatras, but I'm not sure if it's a good way.
aceman444 (2015-05-04 17:42:24+00:00): Why layer=-1? What do you want to achieve?
JakubMap (2015-05-04 18:36:38+00:00): 1. Facilitate the introduction of a larger area.
2. Avoid complex members and relationships. Relationships create problems when making changes.
But the question is:
Is (layer) can cause problems when rendering to other maps?
aceman444 (2015-05-04 18:58:16+00:00): I think we have no layer=-1 on the Slovak part of High Tatras (on bare_rock area) and there do not seem to be problems. I think it is discouraged to use layer on large areas or ways (see the Layer wiki page). It is fine if you do not want to use relations.
JakubMap (2015-05-05 08:07:02+00:00): I'll try to do a larger area bare_rock in the High Tatras using layer-1.
Thank you for your help.
FvGordon (2015-05-03 09:47:04+00:00): Laut PLZ-Verzeichnis der Post hat Hof Kroog aber die PLZ 25146 (die Zahl vor dier Änderung durch diesen CS). Ich vermute, dass hier eher die PLZ-Grenze korrigiert werden sollte und nicht die PLZ.
Swen Wacker (2015-05-04 01:32:18+00:00): Ja, Du hast recht; 24146 wäre richtig. Ich werde tagsüber den Verlauf der PLZ-Grenze korrigieren
Swen Wacker (2015-05-04 09:21:42+00:00): Siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30772733. Meine Änderungen bei den Adressen Hof Kroog 1, 2, 4 und 6 habe ich entsprechend zurückgenommen.
VA00 (2017-06-15 18:54:32+00:00): Chciałbym zobaczyć jak ktoś jedzie tam rowerem. Materiałów utwardzających też nie znalazłem, nie licząc potłuczonych szyb.
emvee (2015-05-03 15:17:24+00:00): Hi MeghaShrestha,

I saw that with this changeset several hospitals were added for example in Dharapani, https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3494714639#map=18/28.45185/83.37409

I have been there last year and I am quite sure there is no hospital there. Maybe there is an doctor there (although I doubt it) and if so amenity=doctors seems to be more appropriate.

Regards,

Martin.
Jarl Arntzen (2015-05-03 16:53:09+00:00): Hi, Megha. Like Martin, I'm also curious about the source for the hospital locations. I've only inspected 5 of them now but the are all in very obviously wrong locations, at least according to satellite imagery: In the middle of forests, hillsides or terreaced fields, kms away from any roads or other buildings. 

Furthermore, on inspecting the Bing imagery, I find no buildings anywhere near the map points.

Are they simply misaligned?

Cheers, Jarl Arntzen
edvac (2015-05-03 22:59:10+00:00): Hi. DWG, HOT and the user that made this import have been notified about this. Waiting for reply from DWG before reverting this changeset. I am sure it was done with the best of the intentions.
MeghaShrestha (2015-05-04 00:37:39+00:00): Hello all, this changeset was imported so there may be some misalignment issues but this changeset had been reverted already.
Jarl Arntzen (2015-05-04 10:08:04+00:00): Thanks for the swift response, Megha. Best of luck on the next import. ☺
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-21 21:20:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3494710417/history has X=84.61970523 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Deanna Earley (2015-12-22 11:49:13+00:00): Hello, can you explain way 342473921?
It's an area with a name and no other information.
Thanks.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-05 06:27:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted in changeset 30798236 because it represents an un-discussed (and quintuple) import
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-05-07 17:21:09+00:00): Mgehling there is newer tagging for the toilet station: see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Toilet_Holding_Tank_Disposal  (and also in German).
herr_taschenbier (2015-05-07 21:27:27+00:00): change tagging schema
emergency99 (2016-02-20 12:08:41+00:00): Bitte bei Bushaltestellen immer darauf achten, dass auf der Straße eine "highway=bus_stop" & "public_transport=stop_position" node ist, und am Gehsteig eine "public_transport=platform" node oder Linie... Das entspricht dem P_T v2 schema mit einer rückwärtskompatibilität zu P_t v1 Danke
sabas88 (2015-05-03 18:26:00+00:00): Per il Rio Fulle, sarebbe meglio metterlo come torrente usando stream (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dstream)
jesusoropeza (2015-05-03 11:29:46+00:00): agregada avenida detras Urb Tarabana Plaza
jiazheng (2015-05-03 11:34:51+00:00): 我是按照這兩個網址的方法解決按下「儲存」後沒反應的問題：
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2630
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2628
jiazheng (2015-05-03 11:54:08+00:00): 解決方法部分中文翻譯+統整：
［Chrome使用者］
1.首先離開「儲存修改」畫面
2.打開Chrome的「開發人員工具」(快速鍵F12)
3.從下半部出現的面板切換到「Console」
4.找到寫著「<top frame>」的下拉選單，改選成「id-embed( id)」
5.在空白文字輸入欄位貼上下列指令後按下Enter：
id.connection().loadMultiple = function(ids, callback) {
        function chunk(arr, chunkSize) {
            var result = [];
            for (var i = 0; i < arr.length; i += chunkSize) {
                result.push(arr.slice(i, i + chunkSize));
            }
            return result;
        }

        _.each(_.groupBy(_.uniq(ids), iD.Entity.id.type), function(v, k) {
            var type = k + 's',
                osmIDs = _.map(v, iD.Entity.id.toOSM);

            _.each(chunk(osmIDs, 150), function(arr) {
                id.connection().loadFromURL(
                    'http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/' + type + '?' + type + '=' + arr.join(),
                    function(err, entities) {
                        if (callback) callback(err, {data: entities});
                    });
            });
        });
    };

6.可以儲存了！
jiazheng (2015-05-03 12:02:17+00:00): ［Firefox使用者］ 
1.首先離開「儲存修改」畫面 
2.打開Firefox的「網頁主控台」(快速鍵Ctrl+Shift+K)
3.在下半部出現的面板的空白文字輸入欄位輸入中文引號內指令:「cd('#id-embed')」後按Enter
4.再輸入跟Chrome第五步驟一樣的指令後按Enter
5.可以儲存了！
Aglis IRM-ED (2022-12-01 04:40:10+00:00): hi, Natalie-xyz987654321, Thank you for your mapping contribution! I deleted the building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/342493490) because the building doesn't exist in the imagery. Thank you. (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30237/task/142648519)
SomeoneElse (2015-05-04 09:46:12+00:00): Would it be possible to add _where_ the self-intersection was removed from in the changeset comment (and for new mappers' benefit, _why_ that's a problem)?
MKnight (2018-01-18 19:39:42+00:00): Moin,
Du hast hier am Untergraben etliche Fahrradständer eingetragen.

2 Sachen dazu; 
1. das sind keine Fahrradständer, sondern so kleine Geländer. 
1.1. an keiner Stelle ist irgendwie ausgewiesen, dass es sich um Fahrradparkplätze handelt. (Theoretisch könnte man da wahrscheinlich sogar ein Ticket wg Parken ohne Parkschein bekommen...)
2. Die Geländer sind zum Fahrräder anschliessen untauglich, da die Stangen sehr einfach abschraubbar sind. Ich weiss wovon ich spreche, mir wurde genau dort bereits ein angeschlossenes Fahrrad gestohlen.
KartoGrapHiti (2018-01-18 20:04:08+00:00): Das die Geländer leicht demontierbar sind, habe ich im Vorbeigehen nicht erkannt. Ich kann auch gut nachvollziehen, dass es etwas unschön ist, wenn hier Fahrradständer eingetragen sind, die falsche Sicherheit vortäuschen. (Gibt es übrigens leider öfter - auch bei Bügeln, die für Fahrradparken gedacht sind). Von daher hätte ich auch kein Problem, wenn die Punkte gelöscht werden.
MKnight (2018-01-18 22:38:31+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung, ich habe die soeben entsorgt.
Endres Pelka (2015-05-08 23:35:23+00:00): Proszę nie sklejać dróg z granicami. Polna dróżka prowadząca donikąd to highway=track, nie highway=unclassified.
DD1GJ (2015-05-03 13:41:44+00:00): Im Wiki steht ausdrücklich: Ein automatisches Ändern bestehender power=sub_station-Tags ist nicht zulässig.

Da keine Zusatztags verwendet wurden, sind jetzt kleine Verteilertrafos nicht von großen Umspannwerken zu unterscheiden. Hlate dich bitte an http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct und mach das erstmal wieder rückgängig.
aseerel4c26 (2015-05-03 15:57:39+00:00): Beispielsweise bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1818978043 oder https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/971984096 wäre es ein Leichtes gewesen, die voltage anzugeben …  Übrigens: die Edits gehen gerade so weiter ... https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30749206  Ich habe nun auch mal angemailt
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-03 23:31:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30762503 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass change of power=sub_station (which also was explicitly discouraged on the wiki)
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-03 23:31:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30762503 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass change of power=sub_station (which also was explicitly discouraged on the wiki)
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-03 23:31:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30762503 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass change of power=sub_station (which also was explicitly discouraged on the wiki)
Hjart (2015-05-04 08:16:26+00:00): Hvad har du tegnet efter? Jeg kan ikke se relevante gps-spor.

Desuden skal du være opmærksom på at forbinde veje og stier korrekt. Se punkt 5 i http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3.1 for vejledning.
aseerel4c26 (2015-05-03 21:47:47+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30761163 after not-satisfying explanation by mail by jengelh. Mailed the original mapper's new account.
OPerivar (2015-06-25 19:34:58+00:00): ich beziehe mich auf edits in Lüchow: oneway an einem gemeinsamen Rad/Fußweg ist etwas ungünstig, da es sich ja nur auf die bicyle beziehen sollte -> besser bicycle:oneway=yes
KartoGrapHiti (2015-07-09 15:58:59+00:00): Das sehe ich anders, denn auch auf anderen Straßen bezieht sich oneway stets nur auf den Fahrverkehr und nie auf den Fußverkehr.
gpsblues (2015-05-03 13:20:53+00:00): Perfezionata Via San Rocco con il sottopasso. Aggiunto il tratto di sentiero verso i campi
nebulon42 (2015-05-03 17:04:03+00:00): This is an automated edit. Where has this been discussed?
aseerel4c26 (2015-05-03 20:22:55+00:00): apparently nowhere. Please see (and discuss at) the some hours older discussion on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30746525 which had the same action
muralito (2015-05-04 00:53:39+00:00): Cambio revertido. No corresponde ni conviene agregar datos personales.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-05-03 23:08:22+00:00): Hej
Dzięki, że rysujesz budynki i dodajesz adresy. Pomyślałem, że może chciałbyś dodawać kompletną/poprawną adresację. Więcej nt. tagowania adresacji: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=210760#p210760
Pozdrawiam
jpennycook (2015-06-14 21:21:43+00:00): Hello.
I see you added Node: Isnage Farm (3495136722) on 3rd May 2015, quite close to Isnage Farm (507966898) which was added on 26th September 2009.  I've noticed that, from time to time, you've added a "place=farm" or "place=isolated_dwelling" right next to an existing node with the same name.  I've deleted the extra node in this case.
jpennycook (2015-06-21 07:46:55+00:00): I've also removed Burkham House (3495124952) which was added next to Burkham House (491862843) - created in 2009.
jpennycook (2015-06-21 07:48:34+00:00): also Tickley (3495124965) and Tickley (194001328) - created in 2012
abc26324 (2015-06-23 11:49:38+00:00): Sorry this was my mistake - human error. I shall endeavour to be more careful in the future.
muralito (2015-05-04 00:53:48+00:00): Cambio revertido. No corresponde ni conviene agregar datos personales.
woodpeck_repair (2015-05-03 23:31:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 30762503 where the changeset comment is: revert undiscussed mass change of power=sub_station (which also was explicitly discouraged on the wiki)
flohoff (2015-05-04 09:08:12+00:00): Das ist ein riesen Changeset - geometrisch. Du hast scheinbar auch nicht korrigiert sondern auf die Gebäudeoutlines geschoben wenn ich das richtig interpretiere.
Sammelmuetze (2015-05-05 04:44:04+00:00): Das stimmt.
Peter Maiwald (2016-07-18 22:58:32+00:00): An dem Gebäude über dem Wehr des Mühlgrabens https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/342529877
befand sich in den 1980ern eine schmale Fußgängerbrücke. Ca. 15m Bachabwärts gab es eine Brücke für Baufahrzeuge (breit, ohne Geländer, Betonplatten). Ging man dort hinüber befand sich nach ca. 20m rechts so eine Art Bunker.
Kindheitserinnerungen aus den 80ern. Falls einer noch mal gucken mag.
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-11-21 17:42:39+00:00): Mapped as "ammenity_2", the bicycle tool stand here won't show on any bicycle tool stand maps.  

Could you confirm this is a bike tool stand as well, open to the public?

amenity_2	bicycle_repair_station
The Process (2015-11-24 01:48:32+00:00): Hey there, 
I can't locate the feature you mean - sorry about the large changeset - will make them smaller in the future.  Is the feature next to the cafe close to Bussell Highway where it crosses the Margaret River?
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-11-24 23:53:47+00:00): Node http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3495145392 has the odd combination of features.  The tool stand tag is for things like http://guides.obviously.com/Public-Bicycle-Work-and-Repair-Stands-2/1925