piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2018-10-25 08:33:46+00:00): Hi,
what is the meaning of the tag "lcn_"? This is not used in any other place. 

Also, the tag "lcn" usually has 'yes' or 'no' as values, but not some text.

Could you have a look and change these to common tags?

Jan
trigpoint (2018-10-25 11:52:17+00:00): London or Local Cycle Network
mueschel (2018-10-25 11:56:03+00:00): I refer to "lcn_", not the common and well-known "lcn".
MacLondon (2018-10-25 14:49:19+00:00): Sorry Jan, my mistake. The "lcn_" was meant to have been "lcn_ref".

This intent is that the "RG" text label for Redbridge Greenway would continue to be applied along this section of the Q6 route (rcn route) which has superceded it.

I've corrected this to "lcn_ref" now and have also changed the lcn value to "lcn=no", which will allow the ways involved to inherit "rcn=yes" from the Q6 relation.

Mac
glibbertorsten (2018-10-26 10:31:56+00:00): Moin, sag noch mal bitte, welche plugins und ansichten ich für josm brauche um Parkstreifen auszuzeichnen?
PantherStrix (2018-10-26 10:43:59+00:00): Moin, ich habe bei Kartendarstellung -> Kartenstile den Stil "Parkstreifen" aktiviert und unter Objektvorlagen die "neuen Parkplatz Features" und "Parkstreifen".
Die neuen Anwohnerparkzone 310 und die Ausweitung gilt aber erst ab dem 26.11.2018 ;-)
glibbertorsten (2018-10-26 11:41:52+00:00): Komisch, hab alle Sachen aktiviert und installiert, in der Darstellung passiert aber rein gar nichts, auch wenn ich andere Kartenstile ein- oder ausschalte...
PantherStrix (2018-10-27 05:23:50+00:00): Die Parkstreifen kannst du im Menü unter Vorlage -> Parkstreifen editieren.
Vom Kartenstil her solltest du parallel zu den Straßen farbige Linien angezeigt bekommen, die die Parkmöglichkeiten (parallel, diagonal, 90°) anzeigen. Schau mal im Bereich Yorkstraße, da hab ich mal relativ viele Parkmöglichkeiten ergänzt.
glibbertorsten (2018-10-30 07:47:25+00:00): Jetzt hab ich's! Hatte "neue Parkplatzfeatures" mit "Parkstreifen" verwechselt. Aber wie kann ich die Tags bearbeiten? Wenn ich eine Straße ausgewählt hab, finde ich kein Dialogfenster, um Optionen auszuwählen...!?
PantherStrix (2018-10-30 11:13:14+00:00): Du musst über das Menü gehen. Unter "Vorlagen" findet sich dann der Punkt "Parkstreifen" und dann hast du die Auswahlmöglichkeit. Wenn du dann eine Auswahl getroffen hast, dann hast du auch im Merkmalsfenster die zusätzlichen Optionen.
Happy Mapping!
StephaneP (2019-08-17 16:11:42+00:00): Salut MacDony,

Dans ce changeset, tu avais déplacé le point de jonction de la bande de décélération de la porte de Saint-Herblain, d'environ 50m vers le sud. C'est à dire au tout début de cette bande. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/290959059/history).
Je suis en train de reprendre l'intégralité du périf Nantais pour utiliser les tags turn:lanes, maxspeed:lanes, destination:lanes.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes

Avec ce modèle, la jonction se fait au plus court, comme pour cet exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/711260103

Donc ne soit pas surpris, et ne décale pas le noeud s'il te plait.

C'est assez visible avec le mode d'affichage "lane and road attribute" dans Josm

A+

Stf
MacDony (2019-08-17 16:42:49+00:00): Salut Stephane,
Le soucis avec une sortie au plus court, c'est que sur les Gps, l'instruction "Sortez à Droite" ou autres, se fait trop tard au risque de filer tout droit.
A moins que ce nouveau bout de segment apporte la solution....
Denis.
StephaneP (2019-08-17 17:57:02+00:00): Et avec une sortie au plus long le navigateur peut penser que c'est trop tard pour sortir alors qu'on a encore largement le temps.
Les turn:lanes permettent de représenter et gérer correctement ces voies.
Et, oui, en général les navigateurs les gèrent. En tout cas, OsmAnd les utilise.
MacDony (2019-08-18 07:34:28+00:00): Bonjour Stephane,
Pas de soucis, bien au contraire, si ça fonctionne pour bien gérer les voies.
J'utilise Navigator Mapfactor comme Gps(OSM).
Je n'ai pas Josm pour voir l'affichage.
Je n'ai que l'éditeur en ligne.
Bon Dimanche.
Denis.
StephaneP (2019-08-18 11:58:55+00:00): A priori c'est géré aussi par Mapfactor.

Tu fais tout avec iD ? Wow ! je ne pourrais pas.
viloan (2018-10-24 13:46:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
rskedgell (2018-10-24 14:06:55+00:00): Hi, thanks for adding this to OSM.
It might also be worth adding the tags club=sport + sport=running to the POI, possibly with some contact:* tags (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact ).
I'll have to take a run down there and try the bar when I recovery from injury.
aylesj (2018-10-24 15:19:28+00:00): Done. Also added opening hours. If you want to go running with the club when you've recovered the running days/nights are Tuesday evening (5k-10k), Thursday evening (intervals) and Sunday morning (10-18k). See the website (URL added) for more info.
rskedgell (2018-10-24 15:43:29+00:00): Thanks! I'll probably pop along for a Sunday run when I'm back on form, hopefully this side of Christmas.
jmapb (2018-10-24 17:00:10+00:00): Hi robgeb -- what source are you using for these fire stations?

I've been using this list to get the official names for the firehouses:

https://data.ny.gov/Public-Safety/FDNY-Firehouse-Listing/hc8x-tcnd/data

Are you simply prepending "FDNY " to these names, or do you have another source?
robgeb (2018-10-24 17:16:19+00:00): Hi jmapb,
thank you for the list.
I searched for existing amenity=fire_station in OSM database and tried to unify. I also added the details of existing nodes to buildings, if existing, I deleted spaces (_/_ --> /) and added "operator=New York City Fire Department". Maybe FDNY in name is not really necessary. I can delete it if we agree.
jmapb (2018-10-24 17:34:15+00:00): Personally I have no problem with the names all starting with FDNY. I like the idea of consistency here.

It's worth noting that there's a lot of variation between the names as they appear on that list and the way they're written on the firehouses themselves. I've been inclined to go with the list version of the name, as it seems more up-to-date. (For example, many firehouses in Brooklyn still have "BFD" on their signs, from when Brooklyn was its own city -- over 100 years ago.)
robgeb (2018-10-24 18:08:03+00:00): Some fire stations in Brooklyn are also tagged FDNY. We should unify the operator tag as well. FDNY or "New York Fire Department"? I prefere the second.
jmapb (2018-10-24 18:30:20+00:00): I've been using operator=FDNY, but I've got no quarrel with operator="New York City Fire Department" -- especially if FDNY is now part of the station names.
robgeb (2018-10-24 18:33:03+00:00): I agree.Thanks for this great conversation. Happy mapping.
jmapb (2018-10-24 18:57:28+00:00): Same to you, and thanks for helping make my city beautiful!
assenizator (2018-10-24 16:07:42+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
assenizator (2018-10-24 16:05:15+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.98.D0.BC.D1.8F_-_.D1.8D.D1.82.D0.BE_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D0.B7.D0.B2.D0.B0.D0.BD.D0.B8.D0.B5_.D0.B8_.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.BA.D0.BE
PT-53 (2018-10-25 10:22:45+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
Du hast in diesem CS südl. Hochdorf Waldwege neu eingezeichnet und gibst als Quelle Esri an. Du bist also die Wege nicht abgelaufen und hast eine Überprüfung vor Ort vorgenommen?
Fragende Grüße
kintetsu (2018-10-25 10:52:41+00:00): Hallo, 
ich habe dazu mehrere Quellen benutzt: esri, google earth und geoportal-bw. Abgelaufen bin ich in diesem Bereich nicht. 
Gruß zurück
PT-53 (2018-10-25 11:31:07+00:00): Hallo kintetsu,
geoportal-bw ist das eine zulässige / legale Quelle ? Meines wissens nein!
Und wie willst Du anhand jahrealter Luftbildern erkennen, ob dieser "Weg" noch existiert und benutzbar ist und wie der Zustand (tracktype) ist?
Fragende Grüße
kintetsu (2018-10-25 12:32:11+00:00): zum geoportal bw, Nutzungsbedingungen des Geodatenviewers: 
"Die Präsentation von Geobasisdaten im Geodatenviewer kann für private und kommerzielle Zwecke unter den Bedingungen der Lizenz Datenlizenz Deutschland - Namensnennung - Version 2.0 (http://www.govdata.de/dl-de/by-2-0) unentgeltlich genutzt werden."
Dort steht dann: 
"... Die bereitgestellten Daten und Metadaten dürfen für die kommerzielle und nicht kommerzielle Nutzung insbesondere
vervielfältigt, ausgedruckt, präsentiert, verändert, bearbeitet sowie an Dritte übermittelt werden;
mit eigenen Daten und Daten Anderer zusammengeführt und zu selbständigen neuen Datensätzen verbunden werden;
in interne und externe Geschäftsprozesse, Produkte und Anwendungen in öffentlichen und nicht öffentlichen elektronischen Netzwerken eingebunden werden. ..." 
Um es genau zu nennen: ich habe die das geoportal nur zur Verifizierung genutzt, nicht die Daten direkt eingezeichnet. 
Zur Nutzung "jahrealter" Luftbilder: Was ist die Alternative? 
Mein Standpunkt: Ich denke da geht es um die Abwägung Perfektion vs. Nutzbarkeit. Will ich alles ablaufen, dann dauert es noch 50 Jahre, bis man eine brauchbare Karte hat. Will ich in angemessener Zeit eine brauchbare Karte ohne große Lücken, dann muss ich auch auf andere Daten (Luftbilder) zurückgreifen.
Gruß
PT-53 (2018-10-25 13:26:32+00:00): Daß Dein Qualitätsbewußtsein nicht so besonders ausgeprägt ist, mußte ich ja leider schon anderweitig zur Kenntnis nehmen.
Schade
Hjart (2018-10-24 16:31:21+00:00): Hvad var formålet med at tilføjje et access=no tag her? Er det helt forbudt at bruge stien?
antonhagedorn (2018-10-25 07:19:14+00:00): Jeg har nok misforstået det Tag. Det var blot for at indikere at kun fodgængere og cyklister har adgang her.
Hjart (2018-10-25 07:22:04+00:00): Stien er tagget som cykelsti. Normalt behøves ikke yderligere tags for at indikere at der ikke er adgang for biler.
antonhagedorn (2018-10-25 08:39:10+00:00): Okay tak. Det var min 2. ændring nogensinde. Fumler måske lidt rundt.
Hjart (2018-10-25 08:43:36+00:00): Helt i orden. Det gør alle nye :-) (og såmænd også mange lidt mere erfarne). Nogle af de mest entusiastiske af os forsøger så bare at fange de fejl der måtte opstå og vejlede lidt.
gitouche (2018-10-24 22:51:36+00:00): Bonjour,

Beau travail dans la zone. J'ai importé les maisons manquantes du cadastre.

Pour l'Impasse des Platanes tu peux terminer simplement sur la "zone de manoeuvre" sans dessiner de rectangle. Celà signifie qu'on peut y faire demi-tour.
viloan (2018-10-24 14:04:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
angys (2018-10-27 02:53:34+00:00): Please dont change building into landuse.
sujatha_1 (2018-10-27 04:13:21+00:00): Hi angys,

Thanks for the Feedback and will ensure further such edits are not repeated.

Thanks & regards,
Sujatha
sejohnson (2018-11-02 19:24:40+00:00): Something is wrong with the service road.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63834435
PierZen (2018-10-24 17:24:46+00:00): As said in previous messages yesterday, You deleted power line ways and re-created them. With this practice, the history of contributions is lost. What is your justification to continue doing that?
maxerickson (2018-10-31 18:42:43+00:00): Hi-

Access roads for businesses and the like should be marked as service roads rather than minor roads.

It's not a big issue, but it gives data users a hint that they aren't as important.

(I've changed the ones just here)

Max
talormanda (2018-10-31 18:54:50+00:00): thx
tux67 (2018-10-25 19:56:12+00:00): Hi,
du hattest wohl bei der Garage eine Linie verwendet, statt einer Fläche.
Ist jetzt berichtigt.

Gruß
Stephan
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63835012
streckenkundler (2018-10-24 15:13:07+00:00): Hei... Das sind nur Baumreihen... du pinselst hier entlang der Schattenkante... Das falsch.... schau noch mal genau hin, ggf. auch mal andere Luftbilder verwenden...
Die bisherige Erfassung war korrekt...
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:27:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
geoaria (2019-05-17 09:01:44+00:00): سلام 
در ترسیم های خود سعی نمایید در هنگام عبور دو راه از روی هم نوع تقاطع همسطح یا غیر همسطح را نشان دهید ، شرق نطنز عدم اتصال مسیرها
*** در ضمن تگ driveway برای مسیرهای کوتاه عبوری ورودی خودرو منازل مسکونی و تجاری بیشتر کاربرد دارد . نه مسیر های خاکی . در اینجا بهتر هست از track استفاده شود. سپاس
ebraplmap (2019-05-17 20:31:44+00:00): سلام جناب مالکی
متأسفانه نتوانستم تقاطع مورد اشاره شما را پیدا کنم، لطفاً شناسه تقاطع و یا راه های متقاطع را ارائه بفرمایید
تنها راهی که در این چنجست تگهای
highway=service ، service=driveway
دارد راه
way 637576771
است و دلیل این است که درون پالیگان
way 637576771
قرار گرفته که خود تگ
landuse=residential
دارد. خیلی ممنون از توجهتان، برقرار باشید
geoaria (2019-05-18 02:31:24+00:00): به آخرین چنگست اصلاحی من در شرق نطنز رجوع کنید سپاس
ebraplmap (2019-05-20 16:00:49+00:00): ملاحظه گردید، سپاسگزارم
geoaria (2019-05-20 16:50:05+00:00): سپاس از شما به خاطر تکمیل نقسه
GerdP (2018-10-25 07:46:53+00:00): Hi! 
You used highway=water_hazard here, I've changd it to ford=yes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/63857829
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ford
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:26:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:41:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
VitalieS (2018-10-25 09:54:37+00:00): Clădirea nu mai există ?
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:28:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
aceman444 (2018-12-05 22:38:16+00:00): Zdravim, preco duplikujete znacky ako public_transport=platform na cele nastupistia, ked uz su prislusne znacky na bode na nastupisti? A ani ich nepridavate do prislusnych relacii liniek MHD, takze ako public_transport=platform nemaju byt oznacene. Staci railway=platform. Taktiez znacka train=yes na tych nastupistiach je nezmysel, ziadny vlak tam nestoji, okrem toho typ dopravneho prostriedku davame na bod s public_transport=stop_position, nie na nastupiste.

A preco ste "aktivovali" zastavku elektriciek SND v smere od nabrezia, ked na nej nic nestoji?

Vacsina z tejto sady zmien mi pripada dost zbytocna a chybna.
aceman444 (2018-12-22 12:50:39+00:00): Prosim nevymyslajte si nove znacky, ak uz existuju ekvivalenty.
bicycle_parking=front_wheel ma byt bicycle_parking=wall_loops (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking)
aceman444 (2018-12-22 14:51:19+00:00): K tym zastavkam a oznacovaniu celych nastupist, samo o sebe to nie je zle, ale potom treba odstranit bod, ktory symbolizuje nastupiste (aby nebola duplicita) a celu platformu vlozit do relacie linky MHD. Ak to Vas editor neumoznuje, alebo to v nom nie je vidiet, tak radsej nastupistia nemente. Dakujem. Vase zmeny nastupist na nabrezi Dunaja som dokoncil a opravil.
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:36:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:30:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:38:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
pyram (2018-11-03 22:14:50+00:00): review http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=63836566 :

Hello Samta Minj,
thank you for contributing.

1. You added https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637555982 as building. The aerial view shows more than one big building. Best way is to add the area as https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dneighbourhood
Try to do that. If you dont know how - I try to help ;-)

2. You changed natural=water to park (Amlidih garden, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455315357 ). Maybe I am wrong, but I think there is a big pond in this park!?

Best regards
pyram
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:44:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:26:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
pyram (2018-11-03 21:59:46+00:00): review http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=63837203 :
Hello Samta Minj,
thank you for contributing.

1. You changed Canal Road to bridge from Katora Talab to NH30. I think there is only a bridge over NH53. If so, you should split the road and change only this part as bridge (I have done this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/640575578 - wrong? Please fix it or tell me what's wrong).

2. You changed this road to oneway:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455311458 That means there is no way out at the east end. That's impossible.

3. You tryed to add a school ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4723626791 ). Best way to do that is to add "amenity=school to this way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637558852 and add the name.

Let me know if I should help!

Best regards
pyram
mtmail (2019-05-22 15:50:57+00:00): I'm a bit puzzled by the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/637558932 It's not near Winnipeg and the postal code doesn't look like US or Canadian
Matthew Darwin (2019-05-22 18:28:34+00:00): Probably delete it....
mtmail (2019-05-22 23:14:07+00:00): Thanks. I found a building with the same address 100s of miles north, must be a strange stray duplicate. Deleted now.
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:36:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
woodpeck_repair (2018-10-30 23:31:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 64027156, 64027404, 64026730 where the changeset comment is: Revert edits made to game osmand live
Cascafico (2018-10-25 09:50:21+00:00): Ciao Beppi e benvenuto in OSM!
Formalmente non sono sbagliati, ma parcheggi così piccoli di solito si mettono come nodo, poi dei due adiacenti ne farei uno.
R0bst3r (2018-10-25 08:57:22+00:00): Hallo Zwiadowca21,
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft, dabei ist mir aufgefallen, dass du die Straße hier mit einer abgebauten Eisenbahnstrecke verbunden hast. ich denke, die Straße verbinden Czernyring und Max-Planck-Ring. Richtig? Hab ich so angepsst.
Viel Erfolg und weiterhin viel Spaß!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63837677
n76 (2018-10-24 20:03:37+00:00): Hi Keith, Me again. :)

Looks like you and I have similar interests in tagging camping and hiking areas.

Have you considered using the campground tagging suggested at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site#Tagging_of_individual_pitches rather than putting names on the individual parking ways?
rskedgell (2018-10-24 16:40:22+00:00): Hi, thanks for updating this object, but please could you restore the shop-funeral_directors tag? It's not a placeholder where the name (which you have added) is unknown, but tells data consumers what type of business this is. Also, what was your source for the addr:postcode tag?
JohnDorman (2018-10-24 17:47:17+00:00): Oops sorry forgot to re-add that. Got all the address info from https://www.eastofengland.coop/funerals/foxhall-road
rskedgell (2018-10-24 19:27:15+00:00): No problem, thanks for re-adding the tag.
Владимир К (2019-05-30 15:31:34+00:00): для переходов используется hw=crossing, а не hw=traffic_signals
mariotomo (2023-05-19 07:53:36+00:00): hola. podrías revisar qué es el elemento que añadiste aquí? gracias!
kapazao (2018-10-24 16:52:02+00:00): why have you removed Wikipedia tags?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63838912
DaveFX (2018-10-24 17:57:21+00:00): I moved them to the relation.
kapazao (2018-10-24 18:09:28+00:00): Ok, I did not see it.
I am not sure if Wikipedia tags should be in both places.
Wikipedia link is for municipality and town.
DaveFX (2018-10-24 18:16:27+00:00): Ok. I just added them to the node too.
djadala (2018-10-25 09:17:50+00:00): as i send you in message, high speed exit F disappeared
djadala (2018-10-26 04:43:25+00:00): Your deletion is repaired by 
changeset 63887289.
All is ok now.
Nmxosm (2018-10-25 08:34:31+00:00): Hallo heinzbecker,

ist der Tag surface=dirt für die Elbinger Straße wirklich angebracht? Meines Wissens haben da alle Straßen eine Asphaltdecke.

VlG Nmxsom
Nmxosm (2018-11-28 07:22:12+00:00): Aufgrund der Satellitenbilder habe ich die Oberfläche zu Asphalt geändert.

VlG Nmxosm
mavl (2018-11-14 15:16:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:19:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].
mavl (2018-11-14 15:19:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64487525 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: undiscussed import].