piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:31:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
nevw (2022-09-29 09:27:07+00:00): Hi
Looks like you have accidentally dragged a node in the top left of this link   
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126769229
Are you able fix it?
John Mapa (2022-09-30 00:14:19+00:00): Hi! Yes, I think it's fixed. It's not reflected in the map. Thanks!
nevw (2022-09-30 00:29:40+00:00): Looks good :)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-29 08:58:45+00:00): Added "Residential" road "Driveway" and multiple road name  according to user feedback TIGER Roads 2021 and Bing Maps Aerial #mbx_usa_editing
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126769382
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:31:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Warin61 (2022-10-14 21:51:00+00:00): Hi,
Changing Way: 689401624 to only   "fixme"="does not exist" has caused me some hours of work to find where train route relations have been broken .. train routs such as Perth to Sydney, Dubbo to Sydney ... 

Me, quietly bashing head against wall...
❤️‍🔥 (2022-10-18 07:48:05+00:00): sorry! i was going to return to survey the actual track layout but didn't get a a chance in the end... i see you've figured out the new route thru Clyde Station, thanks for fixing this

p.s. is it better to leave a gap in the route relations in situations like this? or leave the whole area alone and add an OSM note?
Warin61 (2022-10-19 08:35:13+00:00): A gap in a route relation that is a few kilomerters long and there might be some chance of finding it. A gap in the India Pacific train line that is a few meters long .. no chance. What helped was the gap was used by a few routes. 

Best? Contact the previous mappers.. note the 's'.. some are not interested in the route but make changes to the line that effects the route... I generally try to keep an eye on the sydney train routes - in particular the longer ones. 

If you are going to come back and fix it your self .. I'd not make the gap, just leave it untill you can replace it. This would leave the route functional even if using a fictional section.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-30 06:19:25+00:00): Hoi Wanderer,

Goed bezig!

Wel een opmerking. De parkeermogelijkheden langs de straten zijn eigenlijk geen parkeerterreinen (amenity=parking)

Om te voorkomen dat de straten helemaal vollopen met enorme P aanduidingen is een aanvullende tag ontwikkeld.
Naast amenity=parking
tag je dan 
parking=street_side
parking:orientation=parallel (of perpendicular bij haaks inparkeren of diagonal bij schuin inparkeren) 

De P's zijn dan minder prominent op de kaart aanwezig.

Zie wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:parking%3Dstreet_side

Er is ook een mogelijkheid het langs de weg parkeren om die tag op te nemen in de hoofdrijbaan met parling:lane=....   Dan zie je geen P's
 Consider using parking:lane=* as a simple alternative if the streetside parking spaces are stretched over a longer section of the road 


Je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=126769528

Als voorbeeld zal ik een stukje Jupiterstraat aanpassen met street_side
Kijk je nog even? 

MVG
eggie
Wanderer2000 (2022-09-30 18:31:41+00:00): Dag eggie,

bedankt voor de tip! Het ziet er inderdaad en stuk beter uit op die manier.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
SomeoneElse (2024-03-04 19:01:10+00:00): Hello again,
There is another unnecessary duplicated railway at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/255282533#map=18/53.34431/-1.69862  There is only one feature here and it is both a current multi-use path and former railway.
Your removal of "railway=abandoned" from the trail here is removing valuable data from OSM.
Best Regards,
Andy
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
user_5359 (2022-09-29 10:18:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1098756721. The value of the key name of the street is a description not the name.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
jcr83 (2022-09-29 20:21:16+00:00): Bonjour,
Il est inutile d'ajouter addr:city, l'information est déjà présente grâce aux limites géographiques de la ville.
merylstreet (2022-09-30 07:52:27+00:00): Bonjour, en effet je n'avais pas pensé à cela ! Merci du conseil ;) Du coup je me concentre sur les addr:street !
Bonne journée à vous
ivanbranco (2022-09-30 21:11:07+00:00): Ciao Laura,

grazie per le modifiche. Ho notato che stai aggiungendo dei link a commons, c'è però una sintassi da seguire, ad esempio:

wikimedia_commons = File:Mont Sacré d'Orta Chapelle XIX c.jpg

invece di 

wikimedia_commons = https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mont_Sacré_d%27Orta_Chapelle_XIX_c.jpg
Laura BG (2022-10-02 15:19:25+00:00): Grazie Andrea per la nota, provvederò a modificare correttamente
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
tordans (2022-09-29 09:09:17+00:00): Quelle: https://www.berlin.de/ba-friedrichshain-kreuzberg/aktuelles/pressemitteilungen/2022/pressemitteilung.1249642.php
Hufkratzer (2022-09-30 10:16:20+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/847873388 ist höchstwahrscheinlich ein Reitplatz, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=pitch#Reitplatz, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/90508113 könnten nach dem Luftbild vielleicht Pferdekoppeln sein. Es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass es sich bei den beiden Flächen um zwei getrennte Reitanlagen handelt, vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:leisure=horse_riding. Zwei Beispiele aus der Umgebung zur richtigen Verwendung der Tags: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/728142006 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/53367437
Mond00 (2022-09-30 17:48:28+00:00): ist bereits wie in den Beispielen eingetragen.
Wie die Anlagen genau zusammen gehören, ist mir nicht bekannt. Der Zugang ist nur über eine Privatstraße möglich. Daher die Daten aus dem Luftbild entnommen
Hufkratzer (2022-09-30 20:44:49+00:00): Ich verstehe das nicht, das sieht für mich ziemlich anders aus als in den Beispielen bzw. im Wiki.  Ein einzelner Reitplatz ist keine Reitanlage und eine einfache Grünfläche auch nicht. Aber wenn du meinst, dass es so ok ist, soll es mir egal sein.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Nakaner (2022-09-29 09:52:39+00:00): Hallo,

der Weg hat laut seinen Tags eine wassergebundene Decke (surface=fine_gravel). Warum hast du ihn dann auf tracktype=grade1 hochgestuft?

Siehe hierzu auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tracktype und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:surface

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126770299
jo5210 (2022-09-29 11:06:04+00:00): Weil die Oberfläche kompakt und hart ist. Es ist kein Kies, in den man einsinkt.
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-29 09:22:27+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=34.240345%2C-85.162089%2C17.46
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126770340
Aleksey Gorelikov (2022-09-29 09:22:13+00:00): https://data-usdot.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/usdot::highway-performance-monitoring-system-fsys-3/explore?location=34.240345%2C-85.162089%2C17.46
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126770398
Nakaner (2022-09-29 09:53:25+00:00): Hallo,

an dem Tor war ein description="Geschlossene Hochwassersperre kein Durchgang" erfasst. Du hast jetzt bicycle=yes und foot=yes ergänzt, was dieser textuellen Beschreibung widerspricht. Was stimmt hier jetzt?

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126770466
jo5210 (2022-09-29 11:03:59+00:00): Der offizielle Enztalradweg führt dort entlang.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:31:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-29 10:45:20+00:00): Hello,
I review changesets to check if they are in line with the OSM instructions.

Mapping and tagging highways:
Please check this document to get your knowledge of how to map and tag highways up to date.
https://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/
Do not use the tag highway=residential in rural areas. 
The tag highway=service is not to be used to give access to settlements. See the Wiki,
Tips 
Please focus on highways which connects isolated dwellings, hamlets, villages and bigger.

Tagging of highways:
Please read this wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126771379
mjgk (2022-09-29 11:43:23+00:00): My contributions thus far have been HOT validated IAW the project instructions and validator correspondence. This should be a discussion between OSM/HOT validators and not supposed ‘bad’ mappers thus tightening up the project instructions at the beginning and not changing as the project proceeds requiring regular mappers to continually return to ensure instructs have not changed.
Frans S (2022-09-29 14:23:07+00:00): hello .
I noticed your reaction. However. The general rules how to map and tag highways are the same for HOTOSM projects.
I qualified your changeset as good mapped and included some tips and reference to the Wiki about mapping highways.
It makes no sense to tag a small footpath in-between agricultural fields when they don't lead to or connect buildings.
I noticed also that the validator on this task is active since 3 months on OSM and hardly experienced. I will copy her the wiki about mapping and tagging highways as well.
About me:  I am a senior validator and part of the global validating team.
I've seen so many bad mapped task on a diversity of projects. Often, there is a lack of experienced validators, it can take up till 3 months before a task will be validated. 
When we review changesets, bad performing new mappers will be identified and become comments and advise how to improve their skills. This saves validator time on later projects.

Best regards
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126771379
mjgk (2022-10-02 05:01:10+00:00): Comment from martien-176 about 1 month ago
Hi, i noticed you mapped several highway=track here. Fyi, just a moment ago the project instructions changed and tracks are not required anymore (as are paths).

Thanks and please keep mapping.

Regards Martien, HOT Global Validato