piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
freebeer (2020-01-11 11:35:27+00:00): thank you for that feedback, before i have bothered to add addresses.

my eyes glaze over before understanding what little italian i know, and it is a good thing i have not added any addresses, because what if one address has three or more residential entrances?  i would have put the address i know on the building.

secondly, were i to do a survey of missing housenumbers, i would probably do so by printing the crudly mapped outlines and making notes onto that, and where a building is separated from its adjacent neighbours, mark the way because of GPS inaccuracy and poor aerial imageries, so that the address info follows any corrections and refinement to the building outline.

but i do not know if i will reach that point - i seem to be spending more time fixing things that continue to break rather than to bring my lightning-damaged workstation/server back to working order, so my earlier map improvements have come to a standstill, while i simply use outdated map data to try and plan my daily walks to places that may be there, or not.  today, more shopping!!!

grazie
maraf24 (2020-01-21 12:03:53+00:00): Było już prawidłowo zaznaczone.
iandees (2020-01-08 20:12:38+00:00): This looks great. Thanks for adding to OpenStreetMap. One tip: when you're tracing buildings, be sure to hit the "Q" key while selecting the building so that the corners are squared. Keep up the great work!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79353429
Glassman (2020-01-09 03:11:38+00:00): Anderson hall - know it well - attended a number of meetings in the "dead animal" room on the 2nd floor
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79353472
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-25 11:19:14+00:00): Hey ew742,

you tagged this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761817170 with surface=dirt/sand. What does this mean? Does it mean dirt and sand (and if, shouldn't dirt;sand be used?)? I am asking, because there are quite some usages on taginfo and I don't understand, what is special about this combination. Cheers
ew742 (2020-12-25 20:01:04+00:00): Hi there,

"sand/dirt" is one option in ID, i choose this if there is simply no gras or other treatment to the tracks.

Cheers
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-26 09:19:54+00:00): Hey ew742, I think iD is just auto-completing. If the surface consists out of sand and dirt the value "sand;dirt" should be used. But two values are not difficult to handle by data consumers. So personally I try to choose the dominating value.
freebeer (2020-01-09 02:42:31+00:00): this looks like a private bookmark, badly tagged and in the road and unsuitable for osm
Eddie845 (2020-01-13 20:55:08+00:00): Fe de erratas: La fuente erróneamente ha sido marcada como Maxar Street Level Imagery cuando en realidad corresponde a Mapillary Street Level Imagery
Clopezpro (2020-01-14 14:14:38+00:00): todo ok
Luzandro (2020-01-25 16:12:04+00:00): Hallo hoschibka,

ich habe die beiden riesigen als "is being planned" benannten "Gebäude" entfernt und stattdessen das landuse auf greenfield geändert
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:landuse=greenfield

Die Straße habe ich auf proposed:highway geändert. Sobald tatsächlich mit einem Bau begonnen wird, kann das auf highway=construction + construction=residential geändert werden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts

LG Andreas
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79354466
ToniE (2020-01-09 08:12:53+00:00): Hallo Linda_Esperanto,

this is true, but having public_transport:version on route_master does not harm anything, there's no stringent reason to delete the tag.
On the other side, this is similar to a mechanical edit and should be avoided or at least be discussed first. 

Regards,
Toni
Dr Kludge (2020-01-10 14:21:21+00:00): Hey there.  I spent many years curating the bus routes in my area.  I completely disagree with this mass mechanical world wide looking change.  There is nothing wrong with public_transport:version on the route master.  It marks that all my work will be using that level of the transportation scheme.  Please don't make a change like this again.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79354681
SomeoneElse (2020-01-11 23:49:15+00:00): @all If anyone believe that this mechanical edit needs reverting please let the DWG know.
@Linda_Esperanto This is a mechanical edit and should have been discussed first.  At the very least you owe the people asking you questions about it a reply.
SomeoneElse (2020-01-11 23:49:57+00:00): @all Wenn jemand der Meinung ist, dass diese mechanische Bearbeitung zurückgesetzt werden muss, lass es die DWG wissen.
@ Linda_Esperanto Dies ist eine mechanische Bearbeitung und sollte zuerst besprochen werden. Zumindest schulden Sie den Leuten, die Ihnen Fragen dazu stellen, eine Antwort.
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2020-01-12 00:05:37+00:00): @SomeoneElse: Yes, I'm very sorry. That was imprudent of me. I will not do this again, but I'm not sure what to do now.
SomeoneElse (2020-01-12 00:10:56+00:00): Hi Linda_Esperanto,
Thanks for your reply.  I guess that for now we wait until one of the people whose data has been affected replies - do they think that this change should be reverted, or are they happy with things as they are?
OF course - if you think yourself that it should be reverted, please let us know.
Best Regards, Andy
(from OSM's Data Working Group)
marc__marc (2020-01-15 16:04:56+00:00): the change should have been discussed but i'm ok and happy with it (it's indeed a mistake for me to have a tag on a route_master that doesn't concern the route_master).
if the revert is done because of "not following mecanical edit rules", I will propose a mecanical edit following the rules in the local communities where I am active.
deuzeffe (2020-03-04 22:30:38+00:00): @SomeoneElse some of data I have integrated are affected. I'm waiting a global revert if appropriate. If it's not I will reverted objects affected I have intagrated

@marc__marc Mechanical revert no yet done, apparently. 2 months later, is it not too late ?
deuzeffe (2020-03-05 12:36:40+00:00): @SomeoneElse Finally, it's ok. @marc__marc explained it to me. But even if the correction is correct, it's still a mechanical edit...
SomeoneElse (2020-03-05 22:44:45+00:00): @deuzeffe If a mechanical edit is likely to conduse data consumers, or lose data, then I'll definitely tend to do a revert straight away. In this case it wasn't obvious that either of those had happened, and the person making the change apologised immediately - that's why I asked 2 months ago "do people think this should be reverted" rather than just doing it.
Best Regards,
Andy
deuzeffe (2020-03-06 10:58:31+00:00): @SomeoneElse Thank you for your explanations and your wise reaction. *I don't think* revert is appropriate for objects that concern me. Best Regards.
TZorn (2020-01-09 08:06:12+00:00): Hallo Linda,
du hast hier mechanisch sämtliche public_transport:version von Routemastern gelöscht. Ich kann nichts finden, wo das diskutiert worden wäre. Tatsächlich wird die Verwendung im Wiki empfohlen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport#Route_Master_relations) und es steckt die Arbeit vieler Mapper darin. Bitte erkläre dich und mache die Änderungen rückgängig, wenn es keinen trifftigen Grund gibt, den ich noch nicht kenne.
ToniE (2020-01-09 08:40:14+00:00): Servus TZonr,

ich stimme dir zu was den mechanischen Edit angeht - der sollte reverted werden.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Public_transport#Route_Master_relations

stimmt aber nicht ganz überein mit dem "approved proposal" und definiert hierzu zusätzliche informationen

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Public_Transport&oldid=625726

Evtl. kommt daher die Idee, public_ransport:version wäre nicht definiert - was ich bisher auch so annahm.

Gruß,
Toni
TZorn (2020-01-09 09:34:46+00:00): public_transport:version stammt nach meiner Kenntnis auch für die routes nicht aus dem PT-Proposal sondern wurde später eingefügt, um das Mapping und Validieren zu erleichtern.   

Aber das ist ja normale OSM-Praxis: Ein tag wird entweder über ein Proposal etabliert oder über gelebte Praxis. Und das Tag wurde faktisch sehr oft sowohl in routes als auch route_masters benutzt und dürfte daher als etabliert gelten. Eine Änderung dessen ("deprecation") bedarf dann wirklich einer Diskussion und Abstimmung.
ToniE (2020-01-09 09:37:10+00:00): Stimmt, de-facto.
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2020-01-09 22:07:37+00:00): Hallo TZorn, Mist, das tut mir Leid, ich war zu übereifrig. Ich habe tatsächlich nur auf das Proposal geachtet... Und dass man so eine große Änderung hätte abstimmen müssen, hätte mir auch klar sein müssen.
Ich schaue mir mal an wie bzw. ob ich das wieder rückgängig machen kann.
ToniE (2020-01-09 22:47:32+00:00): Servus und keine Panik, Im Wesentlichen ist nichts kaput gegangen. Im Forum (DE) https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=68407 habe ich das Thema eingebracht. So wie es momentan aussieht ist der allgemeine Aufschrei nicht allzu laut - was den Inhalt der Änderung angeht.
Kristjan ESPERANTO (2020-01-10 07:44:07+00:00): Danke Toni!
ToniE (2020-01-10 08:40:12+00:00): Servus. So wie die Diskussion bzw. der geringe Diskussionsbedarf im Forum verläuft ... wir holen alle mal tief Luft ... warten ab ... und lassen es derweil wie es ist.
5m4u9 (2020-01-09 22:38:10+00:00): añadí la fecha de inauguración al embalse para que quede constancia, gracias
Glassman (2020-01-09 03:14:09+00:00): If the structure exists, you can just change the tag to building=yes.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79355352
user_5359 (2020-01-09 05:44:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
pio2_122 (2020-01-08 20:57:52+00:00): Mam wielką prośbę: nie przyłączaj landuse bezpośrednio do drogi (np. w tym przypadku https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761829755), ponieważ czasami utrudnia to pracę przy dzieleniu drogi np. w celu dodania ograniczenia prędkości itp. Swoją drogą w rzeczywistości, np. pole nie styka się równo z drogą :) Z góry dzięki!
Ravko29 (2020-01-08 21:02:58+00:00): Przepraszam i dziękuję za uwagę. Na przyszłość zapamiętam! Pozdrawiam! ;)
Glassman (2020-01-09 03:14:55+00:00): Thank you for your edits. I reviewed your work and it all looks good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79355536
juminet (2020-01-09 19:27:42+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM!

J'ai remarqué que vous ajouté un tag name="Zone agricole" sur les parcelles que vous avez dessiné. Ce n'est pas nécessaire et plutôt contre-indiqué. 

Bravo pour vos efforts pour compléter les zones agricoles en Wallonie! Si vous voulez être précis, vous pouvez utiliser aussi le tag landuse=meadow (Prairie) pour les prairies, aussi bien les prairies de fauches que les prairies paturées. N'hésitez pas à aussi changer les sources d'images aériennes (Paramètres du fond de carte - raccourci B) et à tester des images des années antérieures (par ex. SPW(allonie) 2015 aerial imagery) pour voir comment étaient ces terres agricoles ces dernières années. 

Happy mapping, 
juminet
Reinhart Previano (2020-01-24 04:27:16+00:00): Hello,I'd like to comment on the changes of the junction of Jalan Gatot Subroto/Letjen S. Parman/Aipda KS. Tubun/Palmerah Utara streets (near the bus station "Slipi Petamburan"). The last map edit on this junction (edited by me), though geometrically incorrect, was designed to cope with a unique turn restriction that may result in fines, for vehicles moving from Jalan Tentara Pelajar as well as Jalan Gatot Subroto (from South to North).

Vehicles moving from Jalan Gatot Subroto can freely choose the direction they would like to turn.

![Screenshot](https://webcompat.com/uploads/2020/1/79d5f65b-6b19-4509-8abd-370297e4f17c.jpeg)

Meanwhile, vehicles from Jalan Tentara Pelajar are not allowed to take a right turn (as well as a U-turn) to Jalan Aipda KS. Tubun and Jalan Gatot Subroto.

![Screenshot](https://webcompat.com/uploads/2020/1/8655bba6-480c-4bfa-842f-c1786c588646.jpeg)
sbburg (2020-01-24 15:54:44+00:00): Hi Reinhart Previano,
Thank you for your comment. Is the fine based on the odd/even license plate restriction or tolls? If the fine you are referring to is the toll, we can tag the link to reflect that. If you could provide more clarification, I can improve this intersection. Thanks!
Reinhart Previano (2020-01-24 16:11:33+00:00): Though yes, there’s the odd-even plate restriction along Jalan Gatot Subroto and Jalan Letjen S. Parman, the aforementioned restriction was simply “Do not turn right from leftmost lane”. A “No Right Turn” signage is installed at the junction between Jalan Gatot Subroto and Jalan Tentara Pelajar, which was intended to be read by vehicles moving from the latter street.
sbburg (2020-01-24 16:59:31+00:00): Thanks for clarifying, I understand the restriction better. I have added a "only_straight_on" restriction from Jalan Jenderal Gatot through Jalan Letjen to prevent the leftmost lane from turning right onto the link. The most recent footage on Mapillary does not show that sign: here is a link to that footage https://www.mapillary.com/app?focus=photo&pKey=Gq5dDqPSFtBP1ULUgv8eJ3
You may want to verify if this sign has been permanently removed. Thank you!
Reinhart Previano (2020-02-01 16:02:49+00:00): Thanks for the edit. Seems that the sign was removed to be replaced with a newer one.

I recently updated the imagery of that junction in Mapillary with the restriction sign re-installed: http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/hGgYlZ-dXJ_rzc_tRI_1lQ/photo
sbburg (2020-02-03 14:30:57+00:00): Awesome, thanks!
mapman44 (2020-01-09 01:55:30+00:00): Please take a look at the Wiki article about "Imagery Offset": https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#ID

It's always best to adjust whatever imagery you are using to the existing OSM data before adding new objects. In your edits if you adjust to the existing surrounding streets, your golf course additions are out of position. Thanks.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/79355767
mavl (2020-01-09 17:06:10+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо за уточнение карты. Напишите, пожалуйста, из какого источника были взяты адресные данные?
user_5359 (2020-01-09 05:23:33+00:00): Willkommen, ist das nicht das gleiche Geschäft, das mit https://www.osm.org/way/129407565 gekennzeichnet ist?
abrensch (2020-10-11 07:18:48+00:00): Hallo HansWorschd,
nach der Planung sollte die ABfahrt B47n->K17 (
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127607370 ) jetzt auch frei sein. Weisst Du das genauer?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt

Planung: https://lbm.rlp.de/de/themen/grossprojekte/b-47-suedumgehung-worms/
HansWorschd (2020-10-12 07:35:49+00:00): Hi, nein leider nicht, bin da in letzter Zeit nicht vorbei gekommen. Schau ich  mir bei Gelegenheit mal an. Gruss
tanonin (2020-12-15 08:16:55+00:00): pourquoi utiliser power pole alors qu'il n'y a pas de lignes electriques?
Lejun (2020-12-16 07:12:27+00:00): Simplement parce qu’il y en a ? Ce changeset fait partie des projets que j’avais entamés avant cette histoire de COVID et que je finirai sûrement pas. Les sources d’éclairage sont à même des poteaux électriques (Sauf erreur de ma part). J’avais mis les poteaux de manière à pouvoir relier avec les lignes plus tard notamment à partir de la même source, à savoir les images «Mapillary» (de Yopyop il me semble)
tanonin (2020-12-16 08:11:50+00:00): Sur la rue de l'épitaphe en tout cas il n'y en a plus depuis la modification de la ligne de bus en 2016, tu peux vérifier avec mes images qui datent .. du 13 sur Mapillary
Lejun (2020-12-18 05:24:41+00:00): Classe ! C’est corrigé, merci
AndriesWijma (2020-06-04 00:17:14+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86157273
Moldovan_Merkator (2020-01-08 22:01:33+00:00): roads*
4004 (2020-01-11 23:52:25+00:00): здравствуйте.
спасибо за постройки - если знаете, можно еще указать их тип (сарай, жилое) через поиск заготовок.
еще вам может быть полезен курс по редактору - значок книжки справа. там обьясняют в том числе как спрямлять углы (правой кнопкой мыши по контуру и выбрать спрямить)
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 23:27:59+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86156679
Vinber (2020-01-10 10:07:41+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai l'impression qu'il y a doublon entre https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7118111585 et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/662403939

Si tout le batiment est le centre médical, on regroupe alors sur le batiment ?

Merci pour les précisions apportées
Lance64 (2020-01-10 14:36:55+00:00): Bonjour, oui, vous pouvez tout regrouper sous une seule dénomination « centre médical «   
Tout le bâtiment est un centre médical. 
Cordialement
Dave Venables (2020-01-09 12:11:34+00:00): I've added a spaces to these post codes and have also used Code Point Open postcode centroids as the Source (See https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/ for many useful address tools) as this (unlike Royal Mail) is suitable for use as a source for OSM
Edward Smith (MilPop14) (2020-01-09 17:28:40+00:00): Thank you for taking the time to leave a comment. Constructive feedback is greatly appreciated. I've looked into the link you posted and CodePoint and now have the overlay for it up and running. I will use this data from now on and will make sure to include a space in postcodes.
syntex (2022-06-19 21:59:47+00:00): Skąd ta nazwa stadionu?
eggie (2020-05-20 14:29:32+00:00): Mike... Dit kan dan weer wel met iD omdat je er maar één tegelijk verplaatst.
Gr eggie
InsertUser (2020-01-09 21:08:13+00:00): Where was this automated edit discussed?
clay_c (2020-01-10 00:17:33+00:00): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2020-January/019902.html
AndriesWijma (2020-06-03 23:02:12+00:00): Reverted due to illegal import: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86156311
viloan (2020-01-08 22:46:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2020-01-09 04:54:18+00:00): I very much hope that the comments on a change set can reach visually impaired people and that the structure of the message does not disturb the communication aids.
The statement that the restaurant is located on the 18th floor is definitely incredibly worthy according to the aerial photograph. Furthermore, the restaurant is located on the street and not in a building.
I would like to help correct the data, but for that I need answers to my questions.
rab (2020-01-11 15:53:53+00:00): Hi,
Wouldn't "place=village" instead of "amenity=community"_centre be more suitable?
user_5359 (2020-01-09 05:12:25+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! 
Darf ich Dich auf den Unterschied zwischen einen Namen und einer Beschreibung hinweisen? 
Wenn Du an einem Haus den Tag (Schlüssel= Wert Kombination) name=Apotheke hinzufügst, dann heißt das Haus Apotheke, aber ist auch da eine Apotheke drin? Das kennzeichen wir dem Tag amenity=pharmacy (siehe https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dpharmacy).
Und da Apotheke wichtige Bestandteile der Infrastruktur sind, legen wir besonders Wert darauf, diese Informationen möglichst  korrekt und umfangreich  zu sammeln.
Warin61 (2020-01-10 06:18:06+00:00): Relation 10559576 is tagged as a multipolygon .. not as a route as it should be.
MichaelCollinson (2020-01-10 07:27:34+00:00): Thanks, corrected.
blackboxlogic (2020-01-28 16:22:05+00:00): I'm curious where you got the zipcode 03000
blackboxlogic (2020-01-28 17:00:47+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80210718
b-jazz (2020-02-27 18:22:50+00:00): Hi Stephenbell93, thanks for the contributions. I'm certainly no expert on creating bus lines, so take this with a huge chunk of salt, but I think that bus lines are supposed to be built by using existing paths (roads) and assigning them to a relation. Also, when creating any path, you should know that they aren't supposed to cross over themselves or double back on themselves. If you need to, you should use a new path anytime this is needed.
Hb- (2020-04-26 14:45:14+00:00): Existiert die Haltestelle "Drage, Krummer Weg" nicht mehr? Vorläufig habe ich den noch in der Straße vorhandenen HAltestellenpunkt dort wieder in die Relation 1306726 aufgenommen.
sundew (2020-04-27 12:57:04+00:00): Hi,
ob die Haltestelle immer noch exakt an der damals von mir ergänzten Position ist, weiß ich nicht - laut HVV-Fahrplan existiert sie aber noch. (Sorry, ich komme zwar viel herum, aber Busstops mache ich nur nebenbei, wenn sie noch fehlen oder unvollständig gemappt sind, sie in meinen Touren alle regelmäßig vor Ort zu überprüfen, wäre etwas too much.)
LG
frosm (2020-01-08 23:29:37+00:00): bonjour et bienvenue
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:France/bienvenue
pourriez vous positionner l'hotel à son bon emplacement ?
il se trouve pour le moment en dehors de tout batiment, sur une zone verte
user_5359 (2020-01-09 05:34:47+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please carry the whole area of the park and not just one node.
Epoch19 (2020-01-09 05:43:19+00:00): Thank you! I am still very new to OSM and used this point to practice. Now, I know better. :)

So, draw the area and then do a node?
user_5359 (2020-01-09 05:50:16+00:00): Please don't add ojects twice (once as node and a second time as area). Draw the area and add the information on the way around the area.
Again: Welcome!
mueschel (2020-01-10 12:08:20+00:00): Please make sure you add street names with the proper name tag.
Be careful using copy and paste, this ends up as its own tag.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/761865983/history
MappnMatt (2020-01-10 16:19:44+00:00): Hello mueschel,
Thank you for pointing this out to me and correcting it. It will not happen in the future. I appreciate your help.
Allison P (2021-02-07 03:33:04+00:00): I can't possibly imagine Holcomb Court has a max speed of 999 mph.