piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
kreuzschnabel (2018-11-07 11:11:10+00:00): Der Berg heißt sowohl Breitsol als auch Geiersberg. Er heißt nicht „Breitsol Geiersberg“ und auch nicht „Breitsol (Geiersberg)“. Deshalb habe ich die Namen taggingtechnisch getrennt und mich für „Breitsol“ als „Hauptnamen“ entschieden (in Anlehnung an deinen Kommentar zu https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54173770, wo du Breitsol auch als den offiziellen Namen bezeichnest). Das ist IMHO die sauberste Form der Abbildung beider Namen als gleichberechtigt, und sie werden beide per Suche gefunden. Darf ich dich bitten, das name-Tag wieder in etwas sachlich Richtiges zu ändern? Es kann auch gern andersherum sein, aber im name=* sollte wirklich EIN Name stehen, nach Möglichkeit der offiziellste / üblichste, und nicht alle möglichen oder üblichen hintereinander.
cepesko (2018-11-07 12:45:07+00:00): Im Bayernatlas findet sich mittlerweile in der neuen digitalen Ausgabe kein "Hauptname" mehr. Beide Begriffe sind in der gleichen Schriftgröße, sollten daher wegen ihrer Prominenz auch in OSM dargestellt werden. Was schlägst du vor?
kreuzschnabel (2018-11-07 13:55:29+00:00): Knifflig. Fragen wir die Community. https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64372
eggie (2018-11-05 21:44:11+00:00): Top!
eggie (2018-11-05 21:49:04+00:00): Denk alleen dat dit niet de Engelse vertaling is van Oecumenisch
Volgens mij is de naamgeving van de school al duidelijk en kun je het net zo goed weglaten.
manings (2019-01-21 08:57:33+00:00): I don't think any of these features exist on the ground.  Reverted via changeset/66497017
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64211850
manings (2019-01-21 09:01:22+00:00): fixed in changeset/66497138
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64211850
Geofreund1 (2018-11-16 10:31:43+00:00): Einer Landstraße wie der L154 den Namen L154 zu verpassen, ist - glaube ich - nicht korrekt. 
ref=L 154 ist ok.
XimeX (2018-11-06 14:25:42+00:00): Hallo Luzandro,

Ist der Import irgendwo angekündigt worden? Ist das auch rechtlich geklärt?

LG XimeX
Luzandro (2018-11-06 17:37:21+00:00): Hallo Ximex,

die Daten stehen unter CC BY 3.0 AT, nach meinem Verständnis ist das daher im Gegensatz zu denen vom BEV, die es nur als cc-by-sa gibt, kompatibel, ansonsten wäre auch praktisch keine Quelle, die unter den OSM-Contributors aufgelistet ist - darunter neben dem Land NÖ z.B. auch basemap - mehr nutzbar:

http://noe.gv.at/noe/OGD_Detailseite.html?id=9ee090f3-4434-4faf-8de1-30e175f293fd
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/at/deed.de_AT
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Austria

Angekündigt wurde das nirgends, ich hatte bisher nur Grenzen einzelner Gemeinden hochgeladen, bei diesem Changeset waren es jetzt ein paar mehr. Nachdem ich nicht automatisiert große Mengen importiert habe, die Quelle bekannt ist und auch schon andere KG-Grenzen existieren, fand ich das nicht notwendig.

LG Andreas
Luzandro (2018-11-06 17:40:27+00:00): Ergänzung: "bekannt" im Sinne von "nicht neu"
XimeX (2018-11-06 20:23:02+00:00): Ok hatte da CC BY SA in Erinnerung. Wenn du mehr importierst würd ich dir aber empfehlen das öffentlich anzukündigen. sonst gibts wieder beschwerden
eggie (2018-11-05 22:15:45+00:00): Valkjes.. water en landuse is het moeilijkste dat er is. De voorgaande mapper heeft "heel" Nederland volgeplept met water op land zonder het netjes in te bedden. Ook heeft hij zich niet willen confirmeren aan de regels die we met elkaar hebben afgesproken. Water taggen we niet op land. Het hoort netjes als inner in een mutipolygoon of de landuse netjes scheiden van het water. Dit is serieus veel werk.
Dit was je edit.
Hier op het forum wordt een nieuwe plugin besproken die je bij water en land kunt gebruiken.
Het advies is om dan niet met het "werk" van mapper P. te beginnen.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=723861#p723861
Maw.. Eigenlijk moet het helemaal anders. :)
eggie (2018-11-05 22:16:44+00:00): In  deze edit kun je zien wie de voorgaande mapper was. https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64212451
valkjes (2018-11-05 23:33:44+00:00): Snap ik je goed als je zegt dat hoe het huidige water er staat het niet correct is? En dat door 'water' uit te bereiden ik de olievlek groter maak? 

Maar is dit erger dan als ik het laat? Want dit helemaal fixen gaat mij nog boven de pet, en er mist nu wel een sloot die onderdeel is van een vaarroute.
eggie (2018-11-06 06:29:58+00:00): Je maakt het niet erger. Wat je wel kunt doen is nog niet bestaande sloten intekenen als waterway=ditch op een lijnelement.  Altijd in de richting van het gemaal. Wanneer je genoeg ervaring hebt kun je een keer beginnen san de grote reparatie.  Dat zal met Josm moeten gebeuren.
eggie (2018-11-06 06:33:48+00:00): Je kunt als je de tijd neemt ook met de g toets de kavels losmaken en dan het water er tussenleggen en met de m toets weer netjes vastplakken. .. project van de lange adem.
valkjes (2018-11-06 08:48:38+00:00): In 64222436 een begin gemaakt. is dit hoe het hoort? En zou je er dan nog een waterway in moeten tekenen? met stroomrichting?
eggie (2018-11-06 08:53:39+00:00): De regel is one element ..one feature, maar bij water maken we een uitzondering. Je kunt dus de waterway=ditch gewoon intekenen in de natuaral=water. De stroomrichting is altijd de richting waarop je de waterway neerlegt. Dus niet oneway=yes oid gaan taggen. 
Sommige kaarten laten de stroomrichting zien. Velomap France bv. 
Josm geeft een waarschuwing als de stroomrichting onlogisch is.
Zal zo eens kijken.
eggie (2018-11-06 08:57:16+00:00): Het is niet verplicht om de waterways er no een keer in te leggen. Het is wel handig als er gerouteerd moet wordn. Bv in Kanalen en rivieren. De naam van het water staat altijd op de waterway. 
Verbindingen tussen sloten met duikers tag je met
waterway=drain, tunnel=culvert, layer =-1
In de BGT omtrekgericht kun je precies zien hoe het in werkelijkheid loopt.
eggie (2018-11-06 09:01:57+00:00): Even gekeken https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64222436
kan het moeilijk zien zo. Het is dus zaak om water en land helemaal te scheiden. Dus geen gras op het water. Meestal lopen die sloten over de grenzen van de kavels. Die kun je losmaken en dan het water er tussen leggen. 
Water dat ingebed ligt in één vlak moet dan weer in een multipolygoon. 
Ligt het water tissen twee aparte vlakken (of meer) dan hoeft dat niet.
valkjes (2018-11-06 09:09:59+00:00): Ik het gras nu tegen het water aangeplakt. in de rechtse onderhoek
eggie (2018-11-06 09:26:44+00:00): Ja dat is correct
eggie (2018-11-06 09:30:20+00:00): Dit even als voorbeeld. De smalle sloten heb ik als waterway getagd .. de bredere watergangen als natural=water. Als het goed is ligt water en land gescheiden. De waterways tekenen we wel gewoon op het land.
natural=water op een vlak is natuurlijk het mooist. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64223323#map=16/51.7845/4.7376
eggie (2018-11-06 10:16:25+00:00): Overigens heb ik de plugin van KiaaTix net getest. Dat uitsnijden van die slootjes die op zo'n grensliggen van wateroverlap  is dan een "eitje"
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=723861#p723861
Zou wel kleine stukje tegelijk doen. en steeds controleren.
Dus even de plugin  PolygonCutOut downloaden.
Omnific (2018-11-06 02:04:41+00:00): Hi, please don't add personal information for private residences.
eggie (2018-11-05 22:26:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-11-05 22:28:33+00:00): Wat is hier precies de bedoeling, want volgens mij ben je bezig de landuse te verwijderen.
eggie (2018-11-05 22:32:29+00:00): Dit is niet helemaal gelukt. Zelfs verre van dat. Je hebt van de stukken landuse multipolygonen gemaakt die heel ergens anders voor bedoeld zijn met tegen gestelde landusetypen. Ik draai je edits terug. 
Multipolygonen zijn om bv een water op te sluiten in een stuk land of een eiland in het water.
Het effect nu is dat de Leisure park te voorschijn komt.
eggie (2018-11-05 22:35:31+00:00): reverted by changeset #64213629 
Dit was je eigen edit.. De landuse was verdwenen. De 3shapes die je wil veranderen zijn allemaal een onderdeel van de import van de landuse. beter niet aankomen als beginner.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2018-11-05 22:35:40+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64213123
eggie (2018-11-05 22:55:09+00:00): Op één kavel kun je wel verschillende soorten landuse hebben. Niet te snel werk verwijderen van een voorgaande mapper. De voorgaande mapper was ikzelf.
eggie (2018-11-06 07:44:45+00:00): PB contact
Carnildo (2018-11-06 08:24:31+00:00): When you say this is "for assignment", do you mean that someone gave you the task of deliberately adding false data to the map?
dikkeknodel (2018-12-03 15:45:18+00:00): Hallo skorbut,
Vielleicht kannst du die Route Relation anreicheren mit mehr Details. Sehe folgende Wiki Seite für relevante Tags:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/HikingNetwork#Recommended_tagging_2
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
skorbut (2018-12-05 08:43:06+00:00): Hallo dikkeknodel

Mir ist nicht ganz klar: Welche Details hättest du noch zusätzlich sehen wollen?

Gruss

skorbut
dikkeknodel (2018-12-11 19:07:09+00:00): Ich nehme an das dieser Wanderweg gehört zu die gelb markierte Wanderwegen. Darum schlage ich vor die folgende tags zuzufugen:
symbol=gelbe Raute
osmc:symbol=yellow::yellow_diamond
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel
mike140 (2019-08-16 12:22:39+00:00): Что-то многовато домов имеют адрес Щорса, 3
Viterall (2019-08-16 18:57:24+00:00): спасибо за сообщение! адреса исправил.
GerdP (2018-11-06 05:54:44+00:00): Hi! You seem to search for a tag to map the area of the highway ? Do you know area:highway? 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aarea%3Ahighway
Fredlyfish4 (2018-11-06 20:25:45+00:00): I haven't mapped roads as areas before, so I was trying things out but wasn't sure what to do. I tried to follow the turning circle here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Circular_and_widened_road_features
GerdP (2018-11-06 20:32:24+00:00): Ah, I see. Whenever the wiki shows a highway=* that means that you should replace the * by a meaningful value. Not only with highway, this is always true.
I see no need to map the area, esp. not when you alse map the node with highway=turning_circle
eggie (2018-11-06 07:01:12+00:00): Ziet er netjes uit.
IgorEliezer (2018-11-06 15:46:44+00:00): Olá tudo bem,

Gostaria de fazer duas perguntas quanto à Estrada de Ferro Sorocabana no trecho entre Sorocaba e Botucatu:

1) Pátios ferroviários: vi que você apagou o nó railway=yard do pátio de Piramboia e transferiu os dados para a área landuse=railway. De acordo com https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dyard as estações de cargas são representadas por um nó railway=yard no centro. E neste https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging tanto as estações de cargas quanto as estações de passageiros são representadas por um nó no centro (respectivamente railway=yard e railway=station) e o terreno seria representado por área landuse=railway. Por outro lado, este artigo https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railway_stations diz que as estações de passageiros são mapeadas com railway=station por um nó no centro ou área contornando só os equipamentos da estação, e o terreno por uma área landuse=railway. Com relação os pátios de estações de cargas, qual seria o certo?

2) Nome da ferrovia: Há trechos com "name=Estrada de Ferro Sorocabana" + "railway:name=Malha Oeste" + "official_name=Malha Paulista" e outros com "name=Estrada de Ferro Sorocabana" +
"official_name=Malha Paulista". Acho que "Estrada de Ferro Sorocabana" era o nome até 1971. No site da ANTT está "Malha Oeste" (http://www.antt.gov.br/ferrovias/arquivos/America_Latina_Logistica_Malha_Oeste_SA.html), e "Malha Paulista" seria o que era as ferrovias da antiga Companhia Paulista e da Mogiana (http://www.antt.gov.br/ferrovias/arquivos/America_Latina_Logistica_Malha_Paulista_SA.html). Não seria melhor que fosse adotado "name=Malha Oeste + old_name=Estrada de Ferro Sorocabana" e no trecho entre Conchas e Botucatu "loc_name=Variante Juquiratiba-Botucatu"?

Pergunto porque não quero correr o risco de perder o trabalho. Fico aguardando.
IgorEliezer (2018-11-06 15:47:44+00:00): Oops, errei de changeset. Ignore o comentário. :)
ikesugitani (2018-11-05 23:52:56+00:00): Building
HelenNE (2018-11-06 09:31:59+00:00): Sorry, not my best commit comment ever.  I tagged the war memorial as a war memorial
Luen Warneke (2018-11-06 00:16:52+00:00): Source: https://wanderstories.space/mt-margaret/
Layft Greater (2025-04-11 06:56:41+00:00): Hello
This edit affected Cyprus.

Could you please review?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/5849234
Layft Greater (2025-04-11 06:57:12+00:00): There might be more ways affected.
Layft Greater (2025-04-11 07:13:25+00:00): Only one road was affected.
Fixed in changeset 164800846

Reviewed with 
https://facilmap.org/#11/35.0252/32.9253/Mpnk/changeset%2064215407
nikospag (2025-04-11 09:57:10+00:00): OK. thanks for fixing it.
aharvey (2018-11-06 03:29:59+00:00): What's your source for the name change?
SweetAs (2018-11-06 13:54:19+00:00): Fixed.
pitscheplatsch (2018-11-06 20:27:59+00:00): Hi Futuris Environment, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several hundred buildings? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64215889
pitscheplatsch (2018-11-06 20:28:09+00:00): Hi Futuris Environment, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several hundred buildings? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64216084
aharvey (2018-11-06 03:28:49+00:00): What's your source for the street addresses?
SweetAs (2018-11-06 12:54:50+00:00): ACMA via Whirlpool: 
http://archivecaslytosk.onion/YVQpR#selection-1343.0-1701.19
aharvey (2018-11-08 05:12:44+00:00): Sorry .onion doesn't work for me, no DNS found. That data is copyright ACMA then, so we can't use it in OSM, which is an open licensed dataset.

If you visit the place and see the street address posted out front then you can add it from survey, but can't copy it from another copyrighted database unless certain conditions are met.
SweetAs (2018-11-08 08:37:54+00:00): Sorry, misunderstood your question. There was no copying of anyone's database. I work in IT and these are all places that I've visited personally. I have photos of some of the signage (not this particular one unfortunately). 
I read your question as "how did you know where to look for it", and my answer was intended to indicate that it's verifiable public knowledge, nothing more. Hope this makes sense.
aharvey (2018-11-08 23:12:11+00:00): That's fine then, thanks for explaining and contributing.

All the ones I've seen have a sign that has some suburb and then the word exchange. eg. Mascot Exchange. So if you see those signs you can add that as the name and use operator=Telstra.
aharvey (2018-11-06 03:27:39+00:00): What's your source for the name change? I originally named it "Cronulla Exchange" likely because that is how it was signposted.
SweetAs (2018-11-06 13:33:47+00:00): Correct, thanks for the heads-up and apologies for mis-editing your entry. Should have paid more attention to the Key:name wiki page. :)
aharvey (2018-11-08 05:08:21+00:00): No worries, I've changed the name back. The name is usually the signposted name.
mapman44 (2019-05-25 23:44:39+00:00): A single palm tree does not meet the criteria for landuse nor a basin so the landuse areas you created around each palm tree are being deleted. Please check OSM Wiki for guidelines pertaining to your map edits.
GOwin (2018-12-24 12:54:31+00:00): Added redundant oneway=yes tags on junction=roundabout ways , which are already implied for all such tags: w200605189, w200605190, w200605197
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64216940
Russ McD (2018-11-12 11:06:48+00:00): Way 641423275
Dear Akram - can you explain why you have drawn a residential road straight through a load of trees, across a pavement, and connecting to a major dual carriageway?
You then go on to change a Secondary Link road (U-turn) into a residential road !
What the crap are you doing ?  You have not been there, and your clearly imagining roads that don't exist.
If you are working for Grab as you claim, then how are the drivers going to feel trying to take a passenger into the bushes, due to your careless mapping efforts.
PLEASE STOP editing immediately until you have learned more about OSM.  I'm asking for all of your edits to be reverted as I don't know what other damage you have done.
Russ.
ak_ram (2018-11-12 11:38:15+00:00): Hi Russ McD,

Thanks for taking time in giving feedback.

The only source to map the data is through satellite imagery and for given segment (way 641423275) path was clear through half way. I continued the segment and connected the segment to dual carriage road in context of maintaining connectivity.Hence link road priority is also changed from secondary to residential 

I now went ahead and changed road classification from residential to secondary_link and basis your confirmation on road not existing in reality, i have deleted it.

Moving forward i will ensure to sync up with my seniors before making such edits.

Thanks,
ak_ram.
Russ McD (2018-11-13 02:08:16+00:00): Hi Akram,  Thanks for revising the way, but please understand that at OSM, we simply do not assume that roads connect when we can't see the connection.
Yes, its a judgement call always, but in a case like this, it would be better to draw half the road where you can see the asphalt, and leave a "fixme" tag, for local mappers to review and visit the area if required.
The very words you used ... "maintaining connectivity" imply you feel all roads have to connect somewhere, which is not the case.
Rgds, Russ
Russ McD (2018-11-13 02:17:00+00:00): I have gone back and corrected that area, but can I explain another error you caused .. when you just deleted the road, you destroyed the actual connection of the U-turn to the Dual carriageway.  To any GPS it would not use the U-turn as it does not see a connection.  You should have re-joined the nodes (which are shown in Potlatch 2 by a red circle over the noded in question).
As I said, please take some time to read about editing OSM before making important changes on major highways.
Its all fixed here now, for u.
Russ
ak_ram (2018-11-13 02:27:19+00:00): Hello Russ,

Thanks for taking time to share feedback and also correcting my mistake.  As suggested, I am put back to training.  Will resume editing in OSM after I am given refresher.  
Sincere apologies for the incorrect edits done and I will ensure henceforth

Thanks
Ak_ram
Russ McD (2018-11-13 03:12:49+00:00): Thank you for your politeness and positive approach.
Glassman (2019-02-17 00:28:03+00:00): I was reviewing this area with http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?lon=32.5701&lat=0.3029&zoom=17

I've driven down the service road behind the L shaped building before and don't recall any restrictions. Should access=permissive be removed?
Richard (2019-02-05 11:12:37+00:00): Think you missed a surface tag off 13182286! Just noticed cycle.travel was routing a Trans-American rider along a rubbishy dirt track :(
ToeBee (2019-02-06 01:44:54+00:00): I think I mostly added surface tags along the roads I was riding on which in this case was the highway that intersects this road. But it looks like I did split this way and removed some TIGER tags during my edit which I suppose took it out of your "unsurveyed" classification. And for the record "some rubbish dirt track" can be a fun gravel ride... if you have the right bike :)
Richard (2019-02-06 12:27:11+00:00): I'm guessing it was probably a case of seeing a tarmac bit at the intersection, but unfortunately the way changed character quite drastically across its full course! I split it yesterday so it should be a bit more aligned with reality now.

surface= tags are a really good way of differentiating for the right bike :)
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
freebeer (2018-11-06 10:45:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64225724 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism.  this is not a park.  please do not vandalise the map by adding fictional items like this.  osm maps what really exists in reality.  #pokemon #vandalism #spam #revert #MAGA #SAD.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
seattlefyi (2018-11-06 17:55:58+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, edits look pretty good to me, thanks! One thing that doesn't apply to these parking aisles, but to be aware of in general: sometimes roads get named after the fact, so they should also be drawn logically (they shouldn't meander and loop, like one of these ways do). Thanks again!
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:24+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
freebeer (2018-11-06 10:25:33+00:00): a post office is not a hospital; also one is already present here
Minh Nguyen (2019-04-04 14:48:12+00:00): Deleted in changeset 68885799.
freebeer (2018-11-06 10:33:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64225399 where the changeset comment is: this changeset caused a node to be pulled well out of place and joined to a car park, plus it adds a node with only a name and no clue as to what it actually is.  reverting damage.  please be more careful when editing.
Supaplex (2019-02-06 16:27:28+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
freebeer (2018-11-06 10:41:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64225620 where the changeset comment is: this is not a park.  please do not vandalise the map by adding fictional items like this.  osm maps what really exists in reality.  #pokemon #vandalism #spam #revert #MAGA #SAD.
Russ McD (2019-01-28 15:42:03+00:00): Way: 641453900 - Dear sra_vya ... I'm just wondering why you drew this road through the hotel lobby, across the roof of three houses then right through a wall we have plotted. 
I have looked at al the aerials we can see, and can see no evidence of a road.  If you were not so lazy and added a source, it might give me a clue where to look for this road.
Or again is it another example of you making up streets to justify your job ?
I would greatly appreciate a reply being as you ignored most other comments I made.
Ars-UA (2018-11-06 08:38:36+00:00): В поле "Имя" улицу и номер дома не пишите.
GOwin (2018-12-24 12:51:14+00:00): Editor is noted to have deleting existing roads and re-adding the same instead of just improving them - which isn't a good practice. Of course, there are known cases where deleting and adding a road is acceptable, but that isn't even the case here.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64219494
mueschel (2018-11-12 07:24:08+00:00): Hallo,
schau bitte hier mal nach den destination:ref - da stimmt was nicht.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29349535
istefanos (2018-11-12 12:03:37+00:00): Danke, gut gesehen.