piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2015-12-15 11:48:45+00:00): Может вы в курсе еще - этот отрезок случайно не сделали односторонним в сторону пл. Останкино http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/91851821 ? Осенью он еще был двусторонним
KoraxDC (2015-12-15 12:20:49+00:00): По Огородному внес уточнение, просьба проверить правильность. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35965194
По отрезку уточню попозже у тех кто недавно ездил.
literan (2015-12-15 12:53:40+00:00): вот этот кусочек  - он остался проезжий? или надо и его заблокировать
KoraxDC (2015-12-15 19:03:21+00:00): По Проектируемому проезду от Огородного к ст.Останкино - работающие там говорят что сейчас указанный вами кусок - двухсторонний, далее, вдоль ЖД - односторонний.
По Огородному - ЦОДД указывает что полностью перекрыт кусок от д.6 до д.10 (маленькое почти квадратное здание на СВ стороне Огородного). Пока более точных данных нет, нужно будет смотреть на месте.
user_5359 (2015-12-14 21:25:59+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Kurze Frage stehen die Häuser schon? Dann könnte man das building=construction entfernen.
snowy66 (2015-12-14 23:55:56+00:00): Ja, die stehen definitiv, hab dort eine Schlussmessung durchgeführt.
pyram (2015-12-15 22:59:27+00:00): http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/483321
maraf24 (2015-12-16 00:07:35+00:00): ldsfjglsfd
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-12-14 23:29:25+00:00): 1. Proszę rysować dokładniej obrysy - nie powinny wystawać poza obrys dachu
2. Proszę dodawać kompletną informację adresową, czyli miejscowość, ulicę i numer, a nie tylko sam numer.
Pozdrawiam
mikkolukas (2018-11-03 17:59:55+00:00): psv=yes er ikke korrekt i buskorridoren - jeg har rettet det tilbage igen.
RichRico (2015-12-22 15:33:09+00:00): Hi jinalfoflia
There is an error of type: crossing buildings
here the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385812116/history
jinalfoflia (2015-12-28 07:04:34+00:00): Thank you for the feedback. 
I have corrected the error and here is my changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385812116/history
RichRico (2015-12-22 15:31:18+00:00): Hi Jothirnadh
There is an error of type: crossing buildings
here the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3891445561/history
Jothirnadh (2015-12-23 14:18:24+00:00): Thanks for pointing out the error RichRico, i fixed the issue. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36126470
RichRico (2015-12-22 15:23:57+00:00): Hi andygol
There is an error of type: crossing buildings
here the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385814939/history
andygol (2015-12-23 08:10:48+00:00): Thank you @RichRico for review
I have just fixed this issue in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36120039
RichRico (2015-12-22 15:26:06+00:00): Hi andygol
There is an error of type: crossing buildings
here the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385816635/history
andygol (2015-12-23 08:15:03+00:00): Thank you @RichRico for review 
I have just fixed this issue in 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36120143
tyr_asd (2017-12-05 09:10:55+00:00): Hi. Why did you use the "landuse_1" tag here, instead of the correct spelling "landuse".

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96220380/history
mucx (2017-12-11 15:44:06+00:00): I have no idea why I used 'landuse_1' here. Maybe it was created by the Grass and Green Project App for whatever reason. However, I cannot find any information about the meaning of this tag, therefore I will change it to the correct spelling.
trial (2018-01-04 22:48:00+00:00): Bonjour, merci de faire un revert ainsi que sur http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35942095 : une adresse de rue (addr:street) doit par définition être au niveau de la rue.
Là vous avez un nœud avec deux codes  fantoir (alors qu'ils ne sont plus liées à une rue et de l'autre côté un bâtiment tout seul avec un numéro dans le coin.
à la rigueur ajouter ensuite un nœud addr:housenumber plus proche de la rue (mais plus loin que le addr:street) à l'image du 23.
trial (2018-01-04 22:50:35+00:00): N. B. : sur le fond, je suis d'accord : les numéro d'adresse de voirie sont affichés trop près de la voirie mais c'est un problème d'affichage, ne pas casser pour le rendu !
Nrm (2018-01-15 16:47:51+00:00): Bonjour, 

Je viens de voir le souci et je suis d'accord avec vous, ma modification doit-être réinitialisée. Je ne trouve pas du tout comment faire dans l'interface d'openstreetmap.org pour faire cette action.
trial (2018-01-15 18:12:56+00:00): Bonjour, corrigé avec le greffon Reverter de JOSM. Effectivement il faut le savoir, je suppose que c'est volontaire (pour éviter que des personnes n'annulent à tort des modifications)
AkuAnakTimur (2015-12-14 17:16:56+00:00): You have deleted a lot of things... May I know why?  // Anda telah memadam banyak data. Boleh beritahu sebabnya?
woodpeck_repair (2015-12-14 23:06:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 35956501 where the changeset comment is: revert accidential deletions
ViriatoLusitano (2015-12-14 12:21:03+00:00): Olá FAlemida

A tua ultima edição removeu bastantes nomes usados internacionalmente, qual foi o motivo?
ViriatoLusitano (2015-12-14 15:26:35+00:00): Reverti a tua edição, espero que compreendas a necessidade de tal.
opendcc (2016-09-16 16:55:32+00:00): Hallo,

für diesen Track gilt ähnliches. Das mit dem, was 'auf der Erde' ist, herzlich wenig zu tun. 

Ich möchte Euch bitten, diese doch etwas unsinnige Route quer über Straßen, Flüsse, Felsabstürze usw. entweder zu verbessern oder zu löschen.
trigpoint (2015-12-14 11:51:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

I do wonder if your business is really in the middle of the road? I also wonder if these are premises that can be visited by a customer with signs so that a passer by can verify their location?
CleaningWarrington (2015-12-15 10:22:30+00:00): Hello, OSM.

It is my personal home address, I did not want to give a 100% exact location where I live. I just wanted to get listed in the area of Warrington, so I can slowly build up my web presence and increase my booking appointments. The services provided are done at the customers location, they can reach us via phone, e-mail and our website booking form.
trigpoint (2015-12-15 10:31:13+00:00): Openstreetmap is a map, items on the map need to be verifiable. We are not a business directory.
If your home has a sign with your business name, you can map that in its correct location, but generally work from home businesses are not something we map.
CleaningWarrington (2015-12-15 10:40:56+00:00): I am planning on adding a sing in the near future, can I re-add it when I have the sing up? I understand, but in this field of work (cleaning services) customers don't come to us, we go to them. This is why I use my home as my base of operations.

Best regards, Ryan Mann.
trigpoint (2015-12-15 10:56:31+00:00): If there is a sign, then you can add your home as an office=company.
trigpoint (2015-12-15 12:48:02+00:00): Reverted
Goffredo (2015-12-15 15:47:07+00:00): Il nome del sentiero è già inserito nella relazione route, non dovrebbe essere replicato pure sul percorso. IMHO.
RichRico (2015-12-22 15:30:09+00:00): Hi Jothirnadh
There is an error of type: building duplicated nodes
here the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3695842995/history
Jothirnadh (2015-12-23 14:21:55+00:00): Thanks for finding the mistake RichRico. Fixed the issue.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/365582996/history
Supaplex (2015-12-18 17:23:02+00:00): 您好：

歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
下面是台灣社群相關的網站，可以加入彼此切磋切磋！

台灣OpenStreetMap網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw

敬祝畫圖愉快！
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:13:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-30 03:14:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44771579 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some google.cn derived objects in China
user_5359 (2022-02-14 06:56:34+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385832913/history (version 1) . What is the meaning of the tag beds = ye on a bridge?
lyctkel (2018-11-09 10:17:57+00:00): Hoi Gijsrooy,
heb jij 3 jaar  geleden de grens van de Abtswoudse Bos gemapt. Het lijkt heel netjes te zijn, dus heb je misschien vergeten de fixme tag te wissen?
Groet,
lyctkel
Gijsrooy (2018-11-09 10:32:20+00:00): Hej,

Poeh, dat is lang geleden! :-) Geen idee, maar het ziet er inderdaad goed uit dus haal maar weg.

Gijs
naoliv (2016-02-04 13:10:20+00:00): Rhauan, você alterou a classificação de Amajari para "town".
Note que a classificação das cidades são baseadas na população.
Um local como "village" não significa que é uma vila, mas que possui população de até 10 mil habitantes.
Por favor, utilize esta tabela http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Key:place#Valores para suas edições futuras.
miguel111 (2015-12-14 20:44:39+00:00): Ahoj. Skrátené názvy ulíc rozpísal na plné názvy užívateľ "Jose". Urobil to pre celé Slovensko . Radšej vráť názov ulice naspäť na plný názov. Teraz je tu guľáš. Sú aj skrátené aj plné.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-14 19:53:21+00:00): (also continuing the conversation from http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52960 )

If something hasn't got a name, there's no need to create one for OpenStreetMap.  I'm guessing that the track at http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25000912 isn't really called "Restricted byway".  You've added a "designation=restricted_byway" tag, so any map style that wants to display that information can do; there's no need to add a name of "Restricted byway" as well.  I probably wouldn't also add a tag "access=not specified" here since you've actually specified most of the options explicitly (horse=yes; motor_vehicle=no etc.).  Strictly speaking you do have a right to travel by non-motorised vehicle (e.g. a horse and cart) on a restricted byway, so some people add "vehicle=yes; motor_vehicle=no" to them, but if you've got the "designation" mapped that's 90% of the work :)

On the "names" thing there's a section of OSM's wiki that might be useful:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Cheers,
Andy
Johnthemap (2015-12-16 16:17:21+00:00): Hi,
I didn't name the way 'restricted byway' - it was already named 'restricted byway closed until 2014'. I just deleted the 'closed until 2014' bit, as the way is now open again. I'll delete the name entirely now. The "access='not specified'" thing - some confusion here as what to put. I originally thought that it would be correct to put "access all= 'no'" in the allowed 'access all' box, as access is not allowed for 'all' but is restricted, I then specified which options were allowed/not allowed access - this seemed to me to be logical at the time. However this made the route show up as private, which it isn't. Looking to edit this again to eliminate the private bit, none of the other 'access all' options seemed correct -= a 'yes' entry to me would have indicated that all modes of transport were allowed, including motor vehicles (and putting "access all='yes'", and then "motor vehicles=no" seems a contradiction. Looking at many footpath entries the access tag is left as 'not specified' - I can see why now, as just putting in the tag 'highway=footpath' and 'designation= public-footpath' reportedly does the job - but it leaves the 'access all' field as 'not specified', which seems to be the accepted way of leaving that field for a footpath. Looking to do the same to the restricted byway, as the 'not specified' option was now not visible on the drop-down list (presumably because it had been previously entered as 'no') I had to manually typed it in. Is this now OK?
SomeoneElse (2015-12-16 17:35:27+00:00): (re the "access=not specified") I can see what's happened now - it is confusing!

To remove a specific key such as the default "All" access one you have to select the value at the right and tnen delete it.  Confusingly, it then says "All Not Specified", very similar to the "not specified" if you type those words in.  To remove a particular value, just select it and delete it.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-16 17:52:24+00:00): (re access tagging on restricted byways) here's one that I tagged over to the east:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/338193078

The "bicycle", "foot", "horse", "motor_vehicle" and "vehicle" tags are designed to make it easier for any people or maps that don't understand "designation=restricted_byway" (technically you can use a horse and carriage on a restricted byway, but not a motor car).
hadw (2015-12-17 10:30:41+00:00): You haven't removed the access=not specified yet.  This tag should be completely removed.  The "not specified" will be an artefact of the way that iD tabulates possible access tags.  It is not a value that should actually appear in the map.
Johnthemap (2015-12-17 11:50:36+00:00): I've deleted the access=not specified tag now. I didn't put the tag there - it originally was access=no. When I edited this in iD, above the key section there is an 'allowed access' section where I have been told that if I entered 'no' under the 'all' section, the way would show up as private with pink blobs. So I altered this and left the 'access allowed all' entry to revert to its default 'not specified', and specified the others individually. This automatically adjusted the pre-existing access key (the one at the bottom, not in the 'access allowed' field) from 'no' to 'not specified'. Didn't see it, and I must say I don't know if I had seen it I would have realised it would be a problem. Still trying to undo my mistakes!
Harald Hartmann (2016-03-27 09:44:59+00:00): Hallo t2425b, zu deinen Änderungen gab es einen Hinweis (http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/503424), welchen ich gestern erst einmal geschlossen habe. Heute morgen bin ich aber von Bad Frankenhausen in Richtung Heldrungen gefahren, und in Oldisleben ist an der Hauptkreuzung offiziell die B85 als Zufahrt zur Autobahn ausgeschildert. Deshalb muss ich mich wohl dem Hinweisgeber anschließen, dass deine Änderung wohl leider eine "subjektive" ist und es "Tagging für den Router" wäre.
Außer du hast natürlich beim zuständigen Straßenbauamt nachgefragt und nimmst hier bereits eine Änderungen vorweg.
Aber auch in Bad Frankenhausen selbst wird schon der Verkehr zur Autobahn, nämlich in Richtung Sangershausen über die L1172 (Esperstedt, Ringleben) geführt!!!
user_5359 (2015-12-14 21:33:31+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Danke für die Ergänzung der OSM-Daten. Häuser werden nicht mit area=yes gekennzeichnet, sondern mit building=yes (oder etwas genauer siehe http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:building)
aseerel4c26 (2016-02-08 13:50:12+00:00): Leider war es noch nicht korrigiert. Das habe ich jetzt gemacht. Außerdem habe ich den Mapping-Unfall https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/474427623 als Verbindung Breslauer mit Hainweg ( https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=35946404 ) revertiert. In: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37079960 und https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37079936
misabrzi (2015-12-22 23:30:51+00:00): U generalnom urbanističkom planu kao i u detaljnom regulaconom planu tog područja, se ne pojavljuje priključek na autoput na tom mestu. Koliko sam upoznat tu je planiran samo podvožnjak koji bi povezao taj deo naselja na bulevar nikole tesle.
user_5359 (2015-12-14 21:40:31+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte auch Firmen nicht (nur) benennen sondern auch bezeichnen. mögliche Ausprägungswerte findest Du im Wiki (wiki.openstreetmap.de, hat aber leider gerade Probleme, deshalb nicht den direkten Pfad)
dgitto (2015-12-15 14:39:57+00:00): Ciao, battisti è il cognome di qualcuno? Magari se sei della zona potresti completarlo
ghostrider44 (2016-03-28 16:32:35+00:00): Hallo Wariner,
am 14.12.2015 hast du auf der Stuttgarter Straße im südlichen Bereich bei der Einmündung der Geisinger Straße in Bietigheim-Bissingen 2 Zebrastreifen eingefügt.
Zum einen befinden sich hier überhaupt keine Zebrastreifen und wenn man solche einfügt, müssten sie auch mit der querenden Linie verbunden sein, die du immer noch nicht mit der B27 verbunden hast.
Über Querungen von Straßen kommst du über
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dcrossing
weiter.
Berichtige bitte deine falschen Eintragungen.
Gruß
ghostrider44
chillly (2015-12-14 16:12:02+00:00): Welcome to OSM.

I see you have added a postcode node to a road. That's not how we use postcodes in OSM. We add postcodes to objects, such as buildings, usually as part of the whole address. Postcodes can't be added to a road, because multiple postcodes can apply to a single road, even with different postcodes on opposite sides of the road. Postcodes sometimes only apply to a single building.

You can see a postcode overlay (that I maintain) here: http://onspd.raggedred.net/

I hope you add some buildings with their postcodes in your area. If you need help, please feel free to ask.
ViriatoLusitano (2015-12-14 15:28:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35943253
Nakaner (2016-07-10 13:33:30+00:00): Ich habe mir gerade die Freiheit herausgenommen, das highspeed=yes wieder zu entfernen. Auf der Strecke fährt man nur 160 km/h, es liegt keine LZB. Viele andere Strecken in Deutschland sind genau gleich beschaffen hinsichtlich dieser zwei Eigenschaften. Dennoch bekommen sie kein highspeed=yes.
RichRico (2015-12-22 15:25:06+00:00): Hi andygol
There is an error of type: crossing buildings
here the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3891983907/history
andygol (2015-12-23 08:12:52+00:00): Thank you @RichRico for review 
I have just fixed this issue in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36120112
cadsauxk (2016-01-25 20:36:51+00:00): Olá Elias. Você acrescentou  (Largo Musicista) à Rua José M. dos Anjos. Este tipo de formatação deve ser evitado. O que exatamente foi a intenção? Se é um nome alternativo isto pode ser colocado como alt_name=Largo Musicista. Obrigado.
elias lopes (2016-01-26 10:49:01+00:00): Olá, Gerald. A intenção era a inserção do nome alternativo mesmo. Obrigado pela dica.
ViriatoLusitano (2016-01-27 16:02:27+00:00): Olá jorgenunes.

Agradeço a tua contribuição, contudo tenho de avisar que a importação de edifícios requer que eles estejam numa licença compatível.

Se isso foi o caso então eles devem ser "limpos" de etiquetas inúteis para o OSM e pelo que vejo há 5 que podiam ser removidas: "CONCELHO", "DISTRITO", "Freguesia", "NOME" e "TIPO"
RichRico (2015-12-22 15:27:17+00:00): Hi abel801
There is an error of type: crossing buildings
here the changeset:: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3892076662/history
RichRico (2015-12-22 15:28:33+00:00): Hi ediyes
There is an error of type: crossing buildings
here the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3892099075/history
ediyes (2015-12-22 19:34:30+00:00): Thank you for the feedback. Here is my change.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36112176
cadsauxk (2016-01-25 20:31:27+00:00): Olá Elias. Há alguma razão particular que levou você a marcar determinadas ruas com highway=road? É que road é uma classificação provisória que precisa ser substituída por outra definitiva assim que possivel. Obrigado.
elias lopes (2016-01-26 10:46:32+00:00): Olá, Gerald. Sei, pelos mapas do IBGE que ali existem vias, porém, é de difícil identificação. Por esse motivo as adicionei como desconhecidas para que posteriormente a alteração com a definição das vias sejam feitas.
cadsauxk (2016-01-28 20:39:45+00:00): Oi Elias. Eu sinceramente não sei se é uma boa idéia inserir ruas que não foram claramente identificadas. Os mapas do IBGE não são muito bons. Eu pessoalmente só insiro se consigo confirmar via Bing ou por alguma trilha GOS. Para o usuário que olha o mapa não fica claro que não existe certeza sobre a existência ou não da via e pode induzí-lo ao erro. Mas você você acha mesmo que vale a pena, coloque uma tag fixme http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fixme, explicando a incerteza. Por exemplo "fixme=confirmar a existência da rua". Abraço
literan (2015-12-14 22:21:53+00:00): пункт выдачи (Онлайн трейд) это shop=outpost! variety_story это "все по одной цене" (Фикспрайс и подобные)
11daf (2015-12-16 12:49:13+00:00): Не нашел в вики такого обозначения. Это даже не магазин. Купить там ничего нельзя скорее офис. Так и обозначу
andygol (2015-12-15 18:40:32+00:00): Лучше 3d елочку сделай 😊
Husim (2015-12-15 20:18:07+00:00): Времени сейчас нет. Появится – сделаю ;)
Sean Dague (2016-04-07 19:50:37+00:00): This doesn't seem to be accurate data. Do you mind if I delete it?
redd (2022-09-03 11:34:56+00:00): Hi Rosty,
danke für deine vielen Beiträge zu OpenStreetMap!
Das von dir genutzte amenity=water bei https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3892219245 ist leider etwas unklar. 
Falls es sich um einen Wasserhahn auf dem Friedhof handelt für Bewässerung, dann kann man_made=water_tap verwendet werden.
Danke,
redd
redd (2022-09-03 13:04:39+00:00): wurde angepasst, danke!
GerdP (2015-12-15 10:56:42+00:00): Hi there!
I changed highway=residential_link to residential. It was discussed here:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/highway-residential-link-tt5859566.html
GerdP (2015-12-15 10:57:39+00:00): Sorry, forgot the link to the way:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/385885786
martinum4 (2016-07-14 17:23:29+00:00): Hallo, hat die K65 wirklich nur eine Spur (Eine Spur heißt, dass zwei Autos nicht aneinander vorbeifahren können.)?
hessenland (2016-07-14 18:56:39+00:00): Hallo, Einspurig heisst das auf der Straße kein Mittelstreifen mehr markiert wird. Das ist heute in der Regel bei Straßen mit einer Breite von weniger als 5 Metern der Fall. Die minimale Spurbreite wird jetzt mit ca 2,5m kalkuliert. Dann muss ein Bus oder LKW im Begnungsverkehr auf den Randstreifen ausweichen (und umfallen, den Graben beackern...etc). Früher wurden auch schmalere Spuren markiert, deshalb finden sich hier und da noch alte Mittelstreifenreste auf schmalen einspurigen (Kreis-) Straßen.
SJFriedl (2015-12-14 19:40:12+00:00): This was supposed to be just Shiloh, the first of many per-street checkins on this batch of work, but I apparently checked in everything, not just the selection.
Nakaner (2016-03-01 19:35:24+00:00): Warum hast du bei den Bahnsteigen railway=platform durch railway=no ersetzt? railway=* ist nicht nur Vollbahn, sondern alle Arten von schienengeführten Verkehren (meistens mit Stahlrädern). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48995210/history

Bitte mach das wieder rückgängig. Danke.
RichRico (2015-12-22 15:35:54+00:00): Hi Luis36995
There is an error of type: crossing buildings
here the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3892332913/history
RichRico (2015-12-22 15:36:33+00:00): Hi Luis36995
There is an error of type: crossing buildings
here the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3892332906/history
Luis36995 (2016-08-05 16:03:57+00:00): Hey Richman! Thanks for your feedback, both of them were fixed.
Polarbear (2015-12-20 01:14:30+00:00): Hi daviesp12, I translate your comment as
"Added buildings and deleted duplicate forests"?

In this changeset, you also deleted the placenode for Slubice (node 26433240) and transferred the tags onto a building (way 385899579), was that intentional or by accident? 

Is that any particular building in the town? 

Typically the place=town is used on a node, or the area of the town. Currently the effect is that the name Slubice is only rendered very small on the building, and the Slubice boundary is rendered around the building. 

I have restored the node in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36056976 and repaired the 3 boundary relations in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/36057029
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-10-05 22:21:26+00:00): de onde voce copiou os nomes?
smaprs (2015-12-14 20:07:24+00:00): Olá. Eventualmente você pode colocar seu nome comercial como um user e sua URL no perfil. Nos comments seria mais útil indicar as edições que vem fazendo, conforme orientação do http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments . Att.
RichRico (2015-12-22 15:35:00+00:00): Hi Luis36995
There is an error of type: building duplicated nodes
here the changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3892385525/history