piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
BCNorwich (2019-08-13 17:39:29+00:00): No trouble, if you need any help please just ask either in the forums or you can message me via my profile (click on my name).
IpswichMapper (2020-10-18 21:10:38+00:00): BCNorwich, I was just reviewing "review_requested=yes", and this did not show up as reviewed. Have you reviewed it using OSMCha, or did you just leave a comment.

Also, as for not joining up tracks with field outlines, what is your reasoning for this? In many cases, paths are effectively the border between one field and another. In that case isn't it technically the most correct to join up fields and paths?

I do realise however that when multiple ways are joined up it makes selecting them very difficult.
BCNorwich (2020-10-19 07:49:13+00:00): Hi IpswichMapper, I was not aware of the OSMCha ability to interact with review requests. It seems a bit convoluted and time consuming. Just another layer of interaction atop of what I do. What I do is look at the first few edits of all new contributors in a fairly wide area from me, irrespective of review request. Then immediately correct anything disruptive or fictional, offer help and/or advice. Interact with any problems to help the new folk learn. If there's no response I look again at the contributions in a week or so and correct anomalies. 

After about forty years tramping the countryside, being told countless times that there has never been a path over or around the field I'm on. Perusing many maps in the course of walking and defending Public Rights of Way, as well as ten years of OSM contributing. I don't think I've ever seen a path or track in each of two side by side fields. There are cases where OS or County Councils have marked a path or track actually on a field boundary but these turn out to be incorrect. County Councils have drawn paths atop of field boundary's but when the definitive statement (which is the legal document), is read the true position of the way is found, (in one field or the other). In dealing with PRoW matters for many years it it has always been stated by legal folk that where there is a hedge or tree line the center of that feature is the dividing line between fields. This line then determine where a path is situated and where the path width is measured from, (hedge or tree center).

Your consideration that multiple ways when joined up are difficult to untangle is correct and at times very time consuming, especially when multipolygons are involved. Very frustrating when this is usually incorrect mapping. A big problem as lots of folk don't draw field boundary's to the hedge lines or leave gaps at hedge lines. It's OK to draw a hedge on a field boundary as that's usually where it's located.

Regards Bernard.
Sorry for the length of this explanation, I get carried away when talking about footpaths.
IpswichMapper (2020-10-19 19:21:08+00:00): Thanks for the detailed response.

The reason I felt that they should be joined up is because if they are not, there is a gap between a path and field, in which case no enclosing way/landuse describes the area within that gap. 

This is obviously not true: there is still something there. Ideally, I would seem that OSM should have absolutely no positions on the map that cannot be described by some enclosing landuse/feature, as in the real world it always can always be described by some enclosing feature.

Of course, this is only a nitpick, and the inconveniences caused by joining up 3 ways probably significantly outweigh this.

Thanks for the detailed response :)
BCNorwich (2020-10-21 07:18:12+00:00): Hi, 
There is not usually a gap between a field and a path.

As I said field boundary's are usually joined together at hedge center line, fence or ditch, thus no gaps between the field edges. Field edge paths or tracks are not usually set on the boundary line (or they would be atop a fence, hedge or ditch), they are set on what is termed the field edge. Within the field on it's edge but not over it's edge. Thus the path is adjacent to the field edge boundary.

The problem, is the fact that we mappers don't know where the legal boundary is. We do know that that fields and boundary lines  are usually measured/taken from the center of fixed or determined features, i.e. hedges, trees, stones, markers, walls etc. We do know that all land is usually owned. We do know that a paths are on one piece of owned land, not two, (except where there is cross over from one field to another). So we can make a pretty good assumption of where a boundary (field edge) is, and know the path is within that boundary, not outside of it. 

Unfortunately most of mapped farmland in OSM doesn't take on board the above criteria. If fact it mostly ignores individual fields, lumping it all as farmland. Often even then drawn very poorly.

Regards Bernard.
FixItDik (2019-08-13 16:28:24+00:00): Sorry, thought all changes had to be reviewed
josmougn (2020-08-26 20:47:24+00:00): bonjour, c'est inutile d'ajouter tous les tags "adresse" sur les batiments dans la mesure où les numéros d'adresses étaient déjà renseignés et rassemblés dans une relation "rue associée". Maintenant tout est en double ! Cordialement.
Begoodi (2020-08-27 08:35:47+00:00): OK je ne savais pas. Merci
highflyer74 (2019-08-14 13:08:49+00:00): Hello!

Could you please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/633013103 for the actual name and remove Hyperion=Drive?

Please use JOSMs validator before uploading data. This would save a lot of QA work for the community.

Thank you!
TourenbikerFKB (2019-09-15 11:57:24+00:00): Hallo Hallenberger, du hast "retail" an die alten Gebäudeumrisse gemappt, die es aber nicht mehr gibt. Leider gibt es noch keine aktuellen Luftbilder. So weit ich gesehen habe (ich war gestern dort, leider ohne Mapper-Werkzeug) ist das neue Gebäude klar und rechtwinklig strukturiert. Mit etwas Peilarbeit sollte man den Grundriss halbwegs brauchbar eintragen können. Für die Bahnhofstraße bleibt dann nur noch ein Stummel, alles andere ist Parkplatz für Netto. Die Durchfahrt zur Schlade ist zwar noch möglich, aber nur inoffizell.
Robert46798 (2019-08-13 18:19:05+00:00): Hallo LuxusSchrottreal,

auch diese Änderung ist in Ordnung.

Ich denke du kannst deinen Änderungen mehr vertrauen! Also du brauchst nicht jedes Mal den "Meine Änderung überprüfen"-Haken setzen.  Bei den meisten Unklarheiten hilft auch ein Blick ins Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Hauptseite

Da du mit einiger Konstanz dabei bist (also durchaus ein höheres Interesse an dem Projekt zu haben scheinst) möchte ich dich noch auf das Thema Hausnummern hinweisen. Die sind für viele Anwendungen wichtig, aber in Burg noch sehr dürftig eingetragen. Vielleicht magst du noch die ein oder andere beitragen? Es gibt natürlich auch noch viele andere Dinge, aber ich denke das ist ein guter vertiefender Einstieg in OSM.

Viele Grüße,
Robert
greeensauce (2019-08-14 14:58:06+00:00): Ich möchte dich darauf hinweisen, bitte Änderungssätze zu benutzen. Außerdem habe ich vor, mir gleich im Müller eine Paulaner Spezi zu kaufen. Herzlichen Glückwunsch zum Hochzeitstag mit Jul.. Justin! Ich meine Justin. Also dann alles Gute Arved.
quecksilberkartograph (2020-06-12 09:18:35+00:00): ???
greeensauce (2020-12-05 19:31:34+00:00): My account got hacked. I wasn't responsible for any actions taken in august of 2019. This seems to be another changeset, written by the anonymous hacker. I am sorry for interrupting!
MicDK (2019-08-15 08:56:15+00:00): I Svendborg er de officielle vejnavne (jf. ois,dk) "A P Møllers Vej" og "A P Møller Kollegiet". Bemærk således at der *ikke* skal være punktum i vejnavnet. Det giver fejlmeldinger i Osmose.

Med venlig hilsen
osmviborg (2019-08-15 09:08:28+00:00): Det er jo så op til din kommune at få det rettet i Danmarks Adresseregister.
osmviborg (2019-08-15 09:12:06+00:00): Ups. Der var jeg for hurtig. Det er uden '.' i Danmarks Adresseregister.
MicDK (2019-08-15 10:27:46+00:00): Ja, deri ligger det lille navneproblem. Jeg ville bare nævne det i al venlighed ;-)
atcomapper (2019-08-15 14:54:30+00:00): Det kommer sig af at AE35 har angivet her, at det skal staves med punktum imellem: https://oisfixes.iola.dk/rettelser/721/
Den "rettelse" har jeg nu slettet, så punktummet vil blive fjernet senere i dag.
atcomapper (2019-08-15 14:56:53+00:00): Vil dog ikke umiddelabrt slette rettelsen for A P Møller Kollegiet (https://oisfixes.iola.dk/rettelser/178/) da den vej i DAR står oprettet som "A P Møller Koll". Her må jeg bede dig lige sende en email til Svendborg Kommune så de kan rette stavemåden i DAR.
scratera (2019-08-13 18:16:52+00:00): ...ma se il livello dell'adige si alza che fine fanno le isolotte disegnate al suo interno vale la pena metterle????
pikappa79 (2019-08-13 21:46:09+00:00): Ciao scatera! Mi rendo conto che il livello dell'Adige é suscettibile ad innalzamento sopratutto durante eventi straordinari o stagioni di piena, ma considerando l'altezza di determinati tipi di vegetazione presenti su di essa credo sia più utile mapparla che non indicarla. In alternativa si potrebbe aggiungere un tag intermittent=yes soprattutto per la parte centrale dove di fatto non c'è vegetazione
frosm (2020-03-21 22:30:59+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez ajouté un gué https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6708115985 mais un contributeur vient de faire une note disant que la traversée est impossible https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2126595
pourriez-vous discuter entre vous pour voirr ce qu'il en est ? le passage est-il possible en été car le cours d'eau est au plus bas ? ou c'est une erreur ?
Bonne continuation
RicoElectrico (2021-01-11 23:07:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2494489
Math1985 (2021-01-11 23:14:33+00:00): Whoops, thanks! Fixed now!
RicoElectrico (2021-01-12 02:07:38+00:00): Thank you for a very quick fix :)
LucN31 (2019-08-13 18:12:44+00:00): Pensio que debemos agregar una tag amenity=restaurant porque como eso (solo una tag restaurante), no se ve en la carta de los gps (como OSMAND+) cuando filtramos por los POI de la categoría bar/restaurantes.
Es el mismo problema con la tag bar.
viloan (2019-08-13 17:30:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
LogicalViolinist (2019-08-13 17:43:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73208555
For explanation of revert

Reverted:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73209034
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73208895
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73208714
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/73208555
InsertUser (2019-08-15 05:32:01+00:00): I really hope the next time the sign blows down it gets reordered by someone who can spell Biscuit.
kdano (2019-08-15 12:34:04+00:00): :)
hoserab (2019-08-13 19:21:16+00:00): Hello Harry,

Thank you for joining and contributing to OpenStreetMap. I have quickly reviewed your edits.

You have mistakenly added the house numbers to the 'name' key in the five houses you edited. "Name" should be used to add the proper name of an object in the map, and only the name (as opposed to a description, address, etc.). Most houses don't have names.

The address numbers you added should instead be tagged using the "addr:housenumber" key. I have made the change to 5212 as an example, refer to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/590019548.
viloan (2019-08-13 18:23:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
hoserab (2019-08-13 19:26:36+00:00): Hi there Sam,

You appear to have changed the postal code of this restaurant from T2L 1K8 to T2L 1L1. Both are valid postal codes for addresses on Brentwood Road NW, but according to the restaurant's website (https://www.brentwood.jamesonspubs.com/) their postal code is T2L 1K8. Double-checking with Canada Post's online postal code lookup tool (https://www.canadapost.ca/cpo/mc/personal/postalcode/fpc.jsf) also substantiates that the postal code for 3790 Brentwood Rd NW is T2L 1K8.

Can you provide a source for the T2L 1L1 postal code?
ZeiP (2020-02-07 14:49:55+00:00): Changeset has removed at least the valid attribute man_made=water_tower from the Juhannuskukkula school building without any information on why the removal was made.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-09-01 19:29:24+00:00): é uma passarela ou uma estação de esportes? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6708152494 por favor, não coloque nomes genéricos, se não é proprio deixe sem nome.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2023-01-01 00:01:14+00:00): removido
d1sr4n (2019-12-07 15:57:17+00:00): Вау, круто
azalizh (2019-08-13 21:07:29+00:00): Thanks for doing it. I was about to do it here.
user_5359 (2019-08-13 19:29:55+00:00): Hello! Please check the lane values for the 1-way roads (example https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/713465719)
viloan (2019-08-13 18:51:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Myazyk (2019-11-28 10:21:13+00:00): Якщо змінюєте назву кафе, то змінюйте назву всіма зазначеними мовами
Frans S (2019-09-03 07:52:11+00:00): Hi Daryosh
See my previous comment about image and squaring and tagging
best regards
roschitom (2019-08-18 22:11:20+00:00): Hallo GPSandante

welche Mehrinformation beinhaltet den der von dir erstellte POI
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6708298545/history
gegenüber den von dir gelöschen  POI
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/659781740/history ?
Von der Community wird sowas als Vandalismus gesehen.
Es ist auch Usus einen Kommentar zu den Änderungen zu hinterlassen.
Eine Quellenangabe wäre auch nicht schlecht.

Gruß ... roschitom
GPSandante (2019-08-25 19:42:03+00:00): Hallo roschitom,

Entschuldigung, es lag mir fern, Vandalismus in irgendeiner Form zu betreiben. Ich bin bei OSM nicht allzu tief in der Materie drin, mein persönlicher Beitrag besteht deshalb in der Regel in Ergänzungen oder Aktualisierung von Tag-Inhalten. 

Der Tag vom Restaurant Kreta befand sich direkt auf einem Knoten der Gebäudelinie. Wenn das so korrekt war, dann ist das natürlich ein Fehler von mir. Mit GoMap!! konnte ich den Tag nicht verschieben. Ich habe diesen dann gelöscht und neu gesetzt. Als Quellangabe kann ich nur angeben, dass ich vor Ort beim Abendessen war.

Gruß zurück! 

GPSandante
roschitom (2019-08-25 20:03:31+00:00): Hallo GPSandante,
sehr vielen Dank für deine Antwort.
Das der Knoten auf einer Gebäudelinie  lag hat den Grund das dieser dann nicht verlierbar ist und auch das Routing mit unterstützt. Dort sollte der Eingang für das Restaurant sein.
Die Art der Quellangabe  wie von dir vorgebracht ist goldrichtig und vorallen sehr stark. Vereinfacht kann man auch survey  hinschreiben.
Ich werde den gelöschten Knoten wiederherstellen (es erscheint dann wieder die gesamte Historie) und deinen Knoten zu was Anderen verarbeiten.
Weiterhin  wüsche ich dir noch viel Spaß bei der Mitarbeit bei OSM und lass dich bitte nicht von solchen wie mir entmutigen.

Gruß ... roschitom
highflyer74 (2019-08-14 13:26:23+00:00): Moin!

Ich glaube, bei der Eiche (hat sie wirklich den Eigennamen "Eichle"?) sollte es genus:de=* heissen...

Viele Grüße!
Qwave (2019-08-14 19:12:30+00:00): Stimmt: "genus:de" sollte es heißen. Ich habe 12 Jahre in Schönaich gewohnt und bin dort noch immer manchmal. Man spricht dort immer von "das Eichle". Das Seniorenheim direkt westlich unf nördlich davon heißt deswegen auch "Wohnen am Eichle". Also Eichle ist der Name, auch wenn das eine alte, ausgewachsene Eiche ist. Halt schwäbisch.
bxl-forever (2020-09-12 17:51:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/460077786
"Ei van Van Rompuy"

Very funny… but please do not do that anymore.
This is considered as vandalism.
user_12328418 (2021-09-15 05:27:43+00:00): Bitte überprüfe deine Änderung:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2844678
Wenn es keine Baustelle mehr ist, sollte es auch geändert werden.
Frans S (2019-09-03 07:50:18+00:00): Hi Daryosh
See my previous comment about image and squaring and tagging
best regards
viloan (2019-08-13 19:45:17+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
viloan (2019-08-13 19:45:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
ndm (2019-08-13 22:13:13+00:00): I'm going to revert this -- you've removed the building tag and all the address information.
natolh (2019-08-14 06:34:57+00:00): Thanks must be a problem with OsmAnd edition tool.
ndm (2019-08-14 19:16:30+00:00): I tried to keep the new tags you added -- so hopefully, just a glitch
Kelasa (2019-08-13 20:13:16+00:00): #ArupSF
miche101 (2019-10-05 09:49:59+00:00): 
Hi 

warum hat du dieser Weg auf access=no geändert?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244229955/history

Gruß Miche
miche101 (2019-10-05 10:55:47+00:00): ..so hab noch mehrere Fragwürdige Änderungen gefunden.. Warum trägt du überall access=no ein?
miche101 (2019-10-05 10:56:37+00:00): ...hab es deine Änderungen im Bereich Erding rückgängig gemacht.
Frans S (2019-09-03 07:44:03+00:00): Hi Daryosh
See my previous comment about image and squaring and tagging
best regards
PT-53 (2019-11-08 08:41:18+00:00): Hallo skyper,
Du hast an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/388116877/history
das Merkmal construction=major eingetragen. Wege im Bau sollten gem. Wiki mit der Merkmal-Kombination highway=construction + construction=footway markiert werden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:construction
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-11-17 08:52:12+00:00): Hallo skyper,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-11-24 11:30:41+00:00): Hallo skyper,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-08 11:16:12+00:00): Hallo skyper,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-15 10:08:17+00:00): Hallo skyper,
schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
skyper (2019-12-17 17:39:46+00:00): Sorry, da habe ich wohl geschlafen.

Baustelle hat sich erledigt.
TourenbikerFKB (2019-08-21 08:49:48+00:00): nun ist "building" doppelt. Warum ein separater node? place_of_worship kann/sollte an das Gebäude und der einzelne node kann weg.
quecksilberkartograph (2019-09-22 10:46:24+00:00): Ist berichtigt. POI bezieht sich jetzt auf Area.
highflyer74 (2019-08-14 12:53:14+00:00): Hello!

Could you please check this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/713486718? No valid tags attached...

Thank you!
highflyer74 (2019-08-14 12:54:48+00:00): By the way, please check your data before uploading it. JOSM gives nice hints for possible mistakes, and this would greatly reduce the amount of QA work the community has to cover.
theArchDruid (2019-08-14 13:56:06+00:00): Hi friend, 

Thank you for the great validation work. It appears I had caps lock on for this one, and was attempting to taking highway=service. I am almost always utilizing JOSM's validation tools, but will be more careful moving forward. T

Your friend, 

theArchDruid