piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ovruni (2021-06-24 21:47:48+00:00): Hola, de la misma forma que en el conjunto de cambios 106923737, por favor utilice la etiqueta de edificio para edificios individuales. Por otra parte, la etiqueta layer [0] se encuentra destinada para indicar el nivel en el que se encuentra un objeto.
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:layer
adiatmad (2021-07-01 13:07:19+00:00): Hello Olaedo!
Hope you are doing great. 

You mapped building=house in a too large area. You should map building one by one. So my suggestion is to modify your recent edit and adjust it based on satellite imagery.

Happy mapping.
Best,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106924499
DaveF (2023-03-24 17:24:48+00:00): Hi
This can't be a tee, it's behind a statue.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958017039/history#map=19/52.93661/-0.61607
Suornode (2021-06-25 18:30:01+00:00): Calles creadas
laznik (2025-06-07 15:17:40+00:00): tunnel=culvert? to asi nie ... 

... a name = "OR Ipľa" ? to je tiez z vlastnej skusenosti? Podla mna je to mrtve rameno, (oxbow?)
laznik (2025-06-07 15:18:15+00:00): pisem o tomto https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/958020190/history#map=16/48.07105/18.87129
SomeoneElse (2021-07-03 13:02:49+00:00): Hello Yocomik,
Here you've changed the name of a road to "Donald J. Trump State Senic Highway". Maybe this was a satirical comment about supporters of the former reality TV host (among other jobs) not being able to spell, but unfortunately for the joke OpenStreetMap is a map of the world as it really exists, not as we might like it to. 
Best Regards,
Andy
Morten Lange (2021-07-09 16:34:39+00:00): Færði stíginn austur af almenna veginum, eftir ábendingu : https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10226824736390734&set=p.10226824736390734&type=3
Tómas Ingi (2021-07-09 16:37:37+00:00): Takk, ég fann enga góða heimild þegar ég merkti hann og þurfti því að giska :)
Aglis IRM-ED (2021-07-07 06:08:08+00:00): Hello Orózco. Can you complete the role of this relation (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/12704711)? because the role is incomplete. Thanks
Fauzan IRM-ED (2021-07-07 22:58:37+00:00): Hola Orózco
Confía en que has hecho tu mejor esfuerzo

Descubrí que eliminó al miembro de esta relación (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/relation/12455221). No estaría bien formado,

Basado en la wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction), la relación debe tener 3 miembros. Puedes completar el papel de esta relación? porque el papel está incompleto. Gracias
Dodko (2021-07-06 17:40:37+00:00): Skúsil som tie parkoviská dať do polygónu ako jedno parkovisko, lebo je to prepchaté značkami
https://sk.mapy.cz/s/defofareze
ovruni (2021-06-24 22:32:50+00:00): Hola, he notado que en sus conjuntos de cambios ha agregado objetos no existentes, como caminos sobre el río, puentes, pasos de peatones. Por este motivo he revertido los conjuntos de cambios. Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe 
Saludos
Lee Carré (2021-08-15 15:38:51+00:00): http://www.gov.je/Government/Consultations/Pages/HillStreetScheme.aspx
Lee Carré (2021-11-21 10:18:57+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/2718174
Lee Carré (2021-11-21 10:22:33+00:00): http://www.osm.org/note/2725147
Lee Carré (2021-11-22 09:37:52+00:00): Parking (on-street): http://www.osm.org/note/2698551
eggie (2021-06-25 05:41:21+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Urbis13 (2021-07-04 12:11:24+00:00): Hello SteBernd; I see that you changed the access tag for the stretch Lecco-Abbadia Lariana of SS 36. As far as I know that specific stretch of the road, despite being dangerous, is open to pedestrian and bicycles and it is not classified as an expressway (because of the lack of another way). Does road regulation have changed recently ? I wasn't able to find anything about this change.
SteBernd (2021-07-04 16:26:25+00:00): Hi,
I cycled from Abbadia to Lecco on 25.5.2021. At the end of SP72 at the beginning of the ramps leading to  SS36 there is a standard round road sign forbidding access to the SS36 for cycles and pedestrian. A second is at the end of the stretch where SS36 goes over Lungolario Piave. I did not check on the reverse direction.
Urbis13 (2021-07-06 14:22:47+00:00): Hi, thanks for replying.
I have found some infos on the website of the ANAS (the operator of the road) and I have discovered that basically the road was temporarly closed to bicycles and pedestrians on the Lecco-Abbadia Lariana section because of roadworks to safety barriers. I cant't check on the ground if prohibition sign are still in place but according to ANAS website roadworks ended 2/7/2021 (decree n.29 / 2021 / MI. And 224/2021 / MI); think it is safe to revert the old access condition
compdude (2021-07-06 07:13:01+00:00): Again, please explain why you feel this should be trunk. There don't appear to be any at-grade intersections, so it should be changed back to motorway. Thanks!
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-07-08 03:52:28+00:00): Qual a fonte para a marcação dos loteamentos ao lado do estádio? cumprimentos
meioserrano (2021-07-08 11:39:04+00:00): Olá,
Alvará nº1 /2008 (loteamento metropolis)
mueschel (2021-06-27 16:54:16+00:00): Hi,
what does "recycling:used_oil" mean? this isn't used in other places. There is 'recycling:cooking_oil' and 'recycling:motor_oil'.
Jose Riha (2021-06-27 18:07:24+00:00): Thank you, "recycling:cooking_oil" is exactly the thing I was looking for. Now fixed. Cheers!
archpdx (2021-07-08 02:03:14+00:00): Hi davegis,
It looks like you've accidentally altered the geometry of Memorial Stadium as well as creating duplicate POIs for features such as the football field, county works building, weight lifting center, and community center. Many of the tags used in these duplicate features weren't what best fits them, for example the fuel pump should not be labeled as a government office. I've fixed these issues in a recent changeset.

-archpdx
adiatmad (2021-07-01 13:01:04+00:00): Hello ACTengygerg!
Hope you are doing great. 

You deleted this amenity that might be added by local. I think the better solution is remove tag building=yes (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/951869808). You can simply redraw it and let me you your tought on this.

Best,
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106927009
jleedev (2021-06-29 14:44:20+00:00): If you can, please provide a source as well as an estimated date that it will reopen.
AngocA (2021-07-20 04:22:56+00:00): Por qué se borró la alcaldía local de Mártires si su ubicación es en el centro comercial? La página oficial de ese establecimiento muestra claramente que aún es esta la ubicación: http://www.martires.gov.co/transparencia/atencion-ciudadano/sede-principal
El Cuasatar (2021-07-20 10:12:31+00:00): Disculpe, la verdad no sabia que la alcaldia estaba en el sexto piso, de hecho nunca he subido allí, por eso por error elimine la alcaldía.  La verdad no se como echar para atrás el cambio, si usted puede darle reversa, por favor hágalo,gracias por estar pendiente de la moderación.
AngocA (2021-07-20 20:14:38+00:00): Listo, ya hice el undelete del nodo que correspondía a la alcaldía.
Kovoschiz (2021-06-25 11:00:44+00:00): House-number means the building number against street, not a tower number. Those should at least be put in `ref=`.
Patchanka (2021-06-25 16:58:57+00:00): bonjour
merci pour la correction.
Je l'avais signalé ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106849814 en espérant que ce contributeur corrige de lui-même.
Mais maintenant c'est fait !
bonne soirée
amakarevich_lyft (2022-07-28 08:50:31+00:00): Hello, Joseph R P

My name is Artem and I am a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. While mapping in the Salt Lake City area, we noticed that you have changed the value of the 'highway' tag from 'motorway' to 'motorway_link' of this segment https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31489419.
Could you please provide any argumentation or additional information that this segment should be 'motorway_link'? 
According to this source https://maps.udot.utah.gov/uplan_data/documents/HRO/
we can notice that this segment is related to I 80. Another evidence of 'motorway' value for this segment on Mapillary image could be found just after the exit: there is a sign "East I 80 Mile 119" https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1780173348821698&focus=photo&lat=40.759911267125&[…]053455497092717&y=0.6110340352178205&zoom=1.4343998941142908 
Also there are ‘name’, ‘ref’ tags and I 80 relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6902136/history on this segment and it looks like it could indirectly confirm our assumptions.
Our vision is to make this place as a motorway junction where it is possible to exit from the highway onto another road. There is a banner https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1390699074633238&focus=photo&lat=40.76062585997204&lng=-111.91521206996998&z=19.879999020055685 where we can notice that exit 121 is going right and I 80 continues straight as 'motorway'. What do you think? Thank you in advance!

Best regards, Artem
Joseph R P (2022-07-28 20:12:58+00:00): In all honesty, I don't remember making this edit since it was over a year ago and I'm not entirely sure why I did it, but I think it had something to do with me believing that this section acts more as a ramp connecting to I-15 rather than its own freeway carriageway. You can revert it if this is an official part of I-80.
amakarevich_lyft (2022-08-01 12:37:22+00:00): Thank you for the quick response!. We fixed the highway class for the discussed segment onto ‘motorway’ in  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124338503

Best regards, Artem
Borut@OSM (2021-06-25 02:32:15+00:00): You appear to advertise your services, both in the changeset description, as well as in descriptions of edited objects.

Your changeset covers the whole world.

You are creating nonexistent objects and not taking into account the validation errors.

All of this is not to be done here at OSM. Please refrain from doing this.
Supaplex (2021-06-25 04:39:17+00:00): revert in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/106932588
Please be aware OpenStreetMap is a crowdsource geo database, not a place for spam
Vinber (2021-06-25 08:57:53+00:00): Thanks Borut et Supaplex
SekeRob (2021-06-25 14:03:35+00:00): If s/he shows contrition, 1 year gulag ban, else 10 is appropriate (seen happen to at least one other spammer on OSM, poof, gone and remembered not to do business with)
skquinn (2021-06-25 04:22:49+00:00): Hi, and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I have cleaned up the issues with your recent edit/addition. Most notably, the phone number, website, and suite (addr:unit) were in the wrong formats. Also, in general OpenStreetMap is not the place for ad copy (changesets are noindex and nofollow) and hashtags are used to describe the changeset, not to advertise.
Kovoschiz (2021-06-25 06:58:00+00:00): Please don't remove `wikipedia=` and `wikidata=`, when you can already edit others direcly.
treestryder (2021-07-04 16:57:58+00:00): You beat me to it. Nice work.  =)
baumann3141 (2021-07-05 17:28:37+00:00): Thanks! There are many more details to update here, though.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106928722
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:55:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Warin61 (2021-06-28 08:06:28+00:00): Hi,
welcome to OSM. 
You have not stated a source for this change. Maxar is usually the most upto date. 

There are errors in Way: 747129881 - natural beach. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.02388&lat=-20.24235&zoom=16

Looking at the coast line here shows some plants being submerged, suggesting that the coastline is in error here. 

Personally as the coastline is the hi tide mark I take the beach out to sea wards to show the extent of the sand - at least to where it fades out. 

If you need help fixing this - leave a message.
yssy16r (2021-06-28 10:33:18+00:00): Hi there,
Thanks for the note and the feedback.
As you're probably aware, the coastline of this island (Whitsunday Island) was in terrible condition - long straight segments instead of large bays and coves, and a complete (and confusing) disconnect between the National Park boundary (which someone has rendered in very high accuracy) and the coastline (which was done at a terrible level of accuracy).

In attempting to correct the coastline (for which I used the current QLDMap Topo as the primary source, and which I meant to attribute) I did make a couple of errors, including the beach which you've picked up on above: having done the coastline, I hadn't yet gotten around to fixing the beach and/or aligning it to the Maxar which I agree with you is a good starting point for the beaches. 

I will work to correct/smooth these, and by all means please feel free to make further changes as you see fit.

As for the mangroves, once again the disconnect between the high accuracy national park boundary and the ridiculous previous coastline that was there has made drawing these mangroves quite difficult. Being mangroves I was less fussed about the areas crossing the coast (and there weren't any drawing requirements specified in the OSM Wiki about whether mangroves must only be drawn on the land side of a coastline) however I take your point and will correct these as well. The source for the mangroves was also the QLDMap Topo.

Once again, thanks for your feedback and any further suggestions will certainly be appreciated.
Warin61 (2021-06-29 07:54:02+00:00): You cannot use that data! 
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_data_catalogue#Queensland ... If it is green you can use it. But not otherwise. 

I think this changeset may need to be reverted due to the source. 

--------------------
The reason why the park boundary is details is because it comes from official sources. 
The coastline is probably hand drawn from imagery - a tedious process leading to the rough nature of it.
yssy16r (2021-06-29 08:13:18+00:00): Look again, as per my previous post, I take your point about the QLD topo (and frankly I wasn't aware of the restriction on that source) however I have also cross checked against the Maxar imagery and will make sure the outlines completely align to that over the QLD Topo. However if you're in a position to revert would would prefer to do so then go right ahead and I'll let someone else make the contribution!
Baloo Uriza (2021-06-25 06:11:48+00:00): area=yes won't change it if it's not already rendering leisure=park.  Consult your renderer's documentation.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106929708
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:37:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
user_11418917 (2021-06-25 04:10:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106931335 where the changeset comment is: Please do not modify the name of the Persian/Arabian Gulf. It is currently subject to discussion.
user_11418917 (2021-06-25 04:17:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106931590 where the changeset comment is: Please do not modify any name in this region without discussing it first, we don't want another issue like the Gulf. You can discuss it first in the mailing list.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-06-26 13:40:22+00:00): تم عكس هذا التغيير لأن موقع قوقل يمنع اعتماده كمصدر لأن قوقل لديها حقوق ملكيه لذا في حال كان لديك مصدر أو معرفة لحدود الحي بدون الاعتماد على قوقل سيكون أفضل، كما أن خانة الاسم يوضع فيها الاسم فقط ولا حاجة للكتابات الزائدة
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-06-26 13:41:00+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107003510
Powerbook001 (2021-06-26 20:47:58+00:00): The updates i made are all gone, this map is now back as before. Encomplete.
Powerbook001 (2021-06-26 20:50:33+00:00): Why I cannot see the mods I did?
pippo6 (2021-06-25 04:56:55+00:00): I meant layer=1, fixed in #106933445
pippo6 (2021-06-25 05:09:36+00:00): Nevermind, done in #106934198
SekeRob (2021-06-25 08:01:04+00:00): Paths mapped inside buildings need set up as either corridors or tunnel=building_passage. This avoids the layering need and buildings floating in the air or ways going underground without bridge or tunnel tags. If there are layering tags now except for the entrance roof, they can be deleted. Bigger mall usually have a routing map showing where each shop is with pathways. Good source to draw indoor pathways, if you fancy to do so ;o)

Oh and everything does seem to be off, buildings inclusive. Does not really matter to me though... close enough.
SekeRob (2021-06-25 08:03:28+00:00): BTW Another set of warnings might be coming too for the indoor part... open ends on pathsways which is why most of the times I don't map beyond the entrance tags.
pippo6 (2021-06-25 09:20:26+00:00): Thank you, noted it. The only layer=* was on the roof and now I removed it, is that right?

Third-party maps can be used to confirm, but not copy (illegal, often outdated or mistaken anyway) without an OSM-specific permission (even if under an open source license). We'd gladly have a looser automated import policy otherwise. My personal aim is the defibrillator anyway.

The buildings are aligned to Esri Clarity Beta, selectable under "Map data" at the right. Drag the gray area under "Imagery Offset" under the aerial imagery list until they align. As long as a smallish area is self-consistent, which imagery is chosen does not matter (large area  inconsistency is due to big project-wide reasons).

If you have Telegram, Matrix or IRC, feel free to join Italy's channel, even anonymously if preferred.
pippo6 (2021-06-25 09:29:08+00:00): Please do all the non-miskaten mapping you want. Warnings meaning "I left the hard part to someone else" are well-considered and easily fixed when some expert notices the area shining in a QA tool as a christmas tree and puts some love in. Warnings meaning "I did so, someone else fix it" are generally considered bad and harder to fix than drawing from scratch.
pippo6 (2021-06-25 09:49:01+00:00): Uhm, but Tag:tunnel=building_passage#When_not_to_use says that a roof should have layer=1 indeed, which just means vertical ordering, not "a change in elevation" per Key:layer
SekeRob (2021-06-25 09:58:51+00:00): The roof layer=1 could have stayed but since I tagged it as building_passage it's not going to cause trouble. Proper is roof at layer 1 and any ways underneath as covered=yes. Made that blob south side round. That building has a huge solar panel assembly on it. I'll map that in a little and make the building 'square'. West and east are off by meters, same with north and south.
Esri beta I prefer, but Esri world imagery is newer. I flip flop to see if buildings were added or landuse has changed.
Map copying and import, no no, I take a photo of the in-house guide map then map by eyeball. Falls under the 'fair use' rule. One village the city tech service head allowed me to take a pic of 2x1.5 mtr w/ all the little vico's. Excellent confirmation of where was what as aerial just does not show them.
TTYL
SekeRob (2021-06-25 12:26:23+00:00): The building integration and relation is complete, now central the mall name appears in big print. Almost all tags from south building transferred to relation. In any 'carto' rendering you'll only see the whole though the parts still stand, no separation walls. Not tagged building levels or heights, internally there will be multiple levels, but only been inside once years ago to remember exactly... just not in my regular routes. Few more bits and bobs, but most all should be near perfect 90 degree angles.
TGIF
pippo6 (2021-06-25 15:14:06+00:00): Whoa! Kudos to you!
pippo6 (2021-06-25 04:57:13+00:00): changeset #106933420
pippo6 (2021-06-25 08:38:51+00:00): Why does this span the whole height of Europe and Africa?
rurseekatze (2021-06-25 08:51:49+00:00): I guess it is because of Bouvet Island, which is Norwegian territory.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/174996681

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/en:Bouvet Island

It would be better to split such edits into separate changesets for the main territory and for each external territory.
Larmax (2021-06-25 12:53:03+00:00): It seems that the Norway relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2978650) was updated which includes Bouvet island, so is it even possible to update it in smaller changesets?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:49:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
osmviborg (2021-06-25 07:04:41+00:00): Brug venligst SDFE aerial imagery, når tegner. Det her ser 'trals' ud.
Ilstrup (2021-06-25 09:37:47+00:00): Thanks for feedback, edited
PT-53 (2021-06-25 05:33:25+00:00): Das
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/193173899#map=19/48.16044/9.55657
ist eine Aussegnungshalle.
SafetyIng (2021-06-25 14:13:14+00:00): If there is a house (why not tag it?) 
Then the way
"Am Weinberg" is a highway=service
and 
the way 958077582 is highway=service + service=driveway
bathines (2021-06-25 15:58:23+00:00): Hi,
As per bing aerial imagery, the road condition seems to be not very ideal for vehicles, as there are track marks and vegetation. Also, there is no vehicle presence proof as per the available resources in OSM. Hence, I have tagged it as highway= track. I assumed the single entity to be a farm house or warehouse for farm utility. I have now modified the tags as per your suggestion.
Thanks for your valuable feedback.
Regards,
bathines
SafetyIng (2021-06-25 21:34:23+00:00): What is there "not ideal for vehicles"? It is a multitrack, compactec way.....?!
But for "track" there is a rule: "Roads used for access to permanent human settlements or facilities should generally not use this tag. "
See also the first three pictures at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=track#Examples_that_may_be_track_roads
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:29:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
abakus_uploader (2021-06-25 22:31:07+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
SafetyIng (2021-06-25 14:09:26+00:00): both ways are driveways