piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-21 18:47:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71492788 where the changeset comment is: Reverting a mechanical edit by a user that tried to avoid a block by creating a sock-puppet user account.  See block https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2900
SomeoneElse (2019-06-20 19:09:35+00:00): Ye Gods!  3801 relation changes!

How on earth did you manage to check each one?  What did you change in each case?

Best Regards,
Andy
sebastic (2019-06-20 19:15:46+00:00): JOSM Validator is your friend. It started with fixing broken polygons (inner way outside mostly), then on initial upload there were several easy to fix validator issues. Just removing the deprecated is_in tags doesn't need to be checked for every object.
SomeoneElse (2019-06-20 19:32:55+00:00): Using JOSM Validator on a large swathe of objects without any checking by you counts as an automated edit and should follow the automated edits code of conduct set out at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct .
Don't do it, or you'll be prevented from editing OpenStreetMap.
I have regularly seen things that JOSM validator suggested ought to be fixed but in reality were perfectly OK (and to be fair to the JOSM developers they usually fix such issues really quickly when pointed out to them).
Also, changing things so that they are "logically correct" doesn't guarantee that what results actually matches the physical reality.  An example of this may be https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71425070 - It looks to me like the "bare_rock" tag ought to apply to the whole area.
Also, for the avoidance of doubt, removing "is_in" adds no value to OSM; it just creates another version of everything.
Back to the original questions "How on earth did you manage to check each one?" and "What did you change in each case?", can you please go through all your changes here and check them, and say what you have changed and why?
I'd start by extracting "before" and "after" relations from your changeset and working out which ones were only an "is_in" change, and then looking at the others to see what happened.  That will reduce the relations that you need to look at from 3081 to a more manageable number.
You've mentioned the "inner way outside" ones - those obviously do all need to be checked manually to ensure that you weren't "fixing" essentially "garbage" data.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
sebastic (2019-06-21 04:20:48+00:00): You can't make volunteers do work. If you want to ensure that I didn't break anything, that's on you.

Block my account if you want to prevent me from breaking anything in the future. You'll need to find someone else to do this QA work and maintain the administrative boundaries in The Netherlands.
SomeoneElse (2020-11-10 16:07:35+00:00): I'm guessing that https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/318534106 has a name that should be "North" in it?
yumean1119 (2019-06-21 03:03:46+00:00): はじめまして。岡山市南部と倉敷市東部を中心に編集しています。水島地区の詳細なマッピングに感謝してもしきれません。

ところで、この変更セットについてですが、私はやはり一番街はhighway=residentialのほうがよいと考えています。
というのは、この道は自動車交通に適した道とはいえないものの、完全に禁止されているわけではない(0時～7時30分と20時～24時は通行可)ので、highway=pathにして車が通れない扱いにしてしまうと困る住民が出てくると思われるためです。
yumean1119 (2019-06-21 03:13:35+00:00): 条件付き制限の書式については、wikiページ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:条件付き制限
をご覧ください。

もし、highway=pathのままで、00:00-07:30と20:00-24:00までは自動車が通れることを記載したいときは
motor_vehicle:conditional=yes @ (00:00-07:30, 20:00-24:00)

とできます。
Moon666 (2019-06-25 07:31:16+00:00): yumean1119さま。
丁寧なご指摘いただき感謝致します。
本件ですが、貴方さまのご意見を参考に本日再度編集をしております。
まだ始めたばかりで稚拙な編集とはなりますが、今後ともご指導の程よろしくお願い致します。
vogelfreier (2019-08-02 18:04:59+00:00): Hello rivermont, for me as a German I do not quite understand this Tiger data system. I thought that with tiger: zip_left = ... and tiger: zip_right = ... how many "households" are present along the streets is shown encrypted.
Why do you then delete in editing https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71456941#map=16/36.0129/-78.9239 this record on this street https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/16532936 (translated with google translator)
rivermont (2019-08-02 21:37:04+00:00): Hi vogelfreier,
The TIGER data was imported years ago to complete the road network in the United States. The `tiger:zip_left` and `tiger:zip_right` tags provide the zip code (`addr:postcode`) for the corresponding side of the street. They're usually accurate and can be used for determining the zip code for addresses, but are 11 years old and sometimes don't correspond correctly. In Durham County and some nearby counties, we have imported all of the addresses anyway, so in this area they're essentially useless. I just remove them with the other TIGER tags when I review the roads.

Translated with Google:
Hallo vogelfreier,
Die TIGER-Daten wurden vor Jahren importiert, um das Straßennetz in den Vereinigten Staaten zu vervollständigen. Die Tags `tiger: zip_left` und` tiger: zip_right` geben die Postleitzahl (`addr: postcode`) für die entsprechende Straßenseite an. Sie sind normalerweise genau und können zur Bestimmung der Postleitzahl für Adressen verwendet werden, sind aber 11 Jahre alt und stimmen manchmal nicht richtig überein. In Durham County und einigen nahe gelegenen Landkreisen haben wir ohnehin alle Adressen importiert, sodass sie in diesem Bereich im Wesentlichen unbrauchbar sind. Ich entferne sie nur mit den anderen TIGER-Tags, wenn ich die Straßen überprüfe.
iWowik (2019-06-21 05:24:29+00:00): Смотрите в других местах, как правильно наносят названия улиц а адреса.
А лучше ознакомитесь с документацией.
Сокращения и порядок слов:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%82_%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3
Формат номера дома:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr#.D0.90.D0.B4.D1.80.D0.B5.D1.81.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.28addr:.3C.2A.3E.3D.2A.29
Не вынуждайте других участников проекта ваши правки исправлять или удалять

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698334821/history
mavl (2019-12-08 11:21:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78101903, 78106642, 78104078 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/70933401].
Frans S (2019-06-24 12:25:31+00:00): Hi Troy, Thanks for mapping here.
A remark.  In urban areas highways (except major highways) has to be tagged as residential.
Please square all buildings with the Q key in iDeditor
try to avoid that nodes of buildings becomes connected to other buildings
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-06-21 13:18:22+00:00): Thank you for a quick reaction! Good luck with mapping!
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-06-21 13:24:16+00:00): Note that some of values displayed by iD in dropdown lists are automatically fetched from list of popular values (via http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/ ).

It means that it lists all common values, including common mistakes - for example in raw tag list "information" key has many bizarre autocompletion values - note that it matches what is listed at https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/information#values
WalkerB (2019-06-23 03:06:27+00:00): I’ve almost got them all done.  I should have all of the errors your pointed out eliminated from Afghanistan by the end of today.
WalkerB (2019-06-23 08:55:14+00:00): Okay, I think I got bridge=culvert errors cleared from all of Afghanistan.  Please feel free to check on Overpass turbo:
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/K9d

Thank you again for keeping me honest and the map of Afghanistan being the best it can be.
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-07-25 16:19:47+00:00): Thanks for improving the map!
Phyks (2019-06-20 22:52:19+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM,

Je ne comprends pas très bien cette modification. L'adresse a en effet été ajoutée sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/59849729 mais plusieurs bâtiments ont eu leur géométrie modifiée. Pourquoi ?

N'hésitez pas à répondre ici ou à m'envoyer un message privé par la messagerie du site.

Bonne soirée,
JJ-gliding (2019-06-22 14:05:36+00:00): Beste Jaap,

Ik vraag me af waarom je een aantal wegen hebt verwijderd. Kun je dat toelichten?
jaap de vries (2019-06-22 14:56:10+00:00): Ik heb de wegen niet verwijderd, alleen de weg tags aangepast naar de werkelijkheid. Er wordt nog flink gebouwd hier. Als de weg af is kan de tag weer weg, de huizen en landuse ook aanpassen. De Bag geeft dit ook aan.
JJ-gliding (2019-06-22 17:03:57+00:00): Er zijn inderdaad een heel aantal wegen gewijzigd, maar er zijn er ook echt 3 verwijderd. Het Ingmar Bergmanpark liep ten noorden van de gebouwde huizen rechtdoor en van de Alfred Hichcockstraat naar het zuiderveld liep een weg.
JJ-gliding (2019-06-22 17:09:47+00:00): Beste Jaap,

Hier moet ik evl5 toch echt gelijk geven. Ik ben zojuist even wezen kijken, die ingetekende fietspaden bestaan echt. Ze zijn al in een definitieve versie gelegd inclusief bollards die de doorgang voor auto's moet verhinderen.
jholland4134 (2019-06-20 19:46:44+00:00): Useless addition, can be removed.
tux67 (2019-06-24 05:49:57+00:00): da fehlte noch ein building=kindergarten, wenn du das gelände eingrenzen kannst, kann man das auch einzeichnen und das Amenity tag dort anbringen
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71457725
fx99 (2019-06-21 11:49:59+00:00): There are now 2 admin-relations (9685840,9677637 incompete) level=6, name=Simonds Parish.
Which is the correct one?
Dartmouthmapmaker (2019-06-21 14:44:30+00:00): the one that shares boundaries with Saint John County
jholland4134 (2019-06-20 19:46:28+00:00): Useless addition, can be removed.
jholland4134 (2019-06-20 19:46:17+00:00): Useless addition, can be removed.
frodrigo (2019-07-12 20:48:15+00:00): "Avenida René Ramos Latour" is large but not a main road.
jholland4134 (2019-06-20 19:46:07+00:00): Useless addition, can be removed.
4004 (2019-06-21 13:02:18+00:00): а шо там площадку открыли?
Pavelfantik (2019-06-22 18:00:53+00:00): сегодня издалека видел как там играли. не разобрал где там вход. позже замаплю
abakus_uploader (2019-06-20 22:33:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_5359 (2020-04-27 17:04:25+00:00): Hello! Is this a shop or a amenity=fast_food/restaurant?
philippec (2019-10-06 13:10:19+00:00): Volgens mij is de Mariagrot meer oost.  
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.24785292184751&lng=4.441780310239665&z=19.51443284704768&menu=false&focus=map&feedItem=user-HKHUisalF1GJPWnTYvq8Mg-following_object-system-system-created-signup_notification%3A1553532079067&pKey=zbZ24igKbjdupy1ostCUyQ
user_5359 (2019-06-20 20:21:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of your buisness please look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dcannabis
TaraV (2021-02-18 08:46:55+00:00): This does not seem like a motorway junction. They can be used on roads that are not motorways, but these are usually clearly marked as exits on signs and can have exit numbers that should be added as ref tags(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=motorway_junction). If you want to add a signpost referring to where the road leads you can add it as a destination on way (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination) or a destination in a relation (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:destination_sign). Please review this.
Leo Slager (2019-06-23 01:07:03+00:00): prima gedaan
Frans S (2019-06-24 17:24:23+00:00): Hi Ddub512. 
Thanks for mapping here.
In general, precise and fine mapped.
A few remarks.  you tend to map a bit oversized. Try to stay within the outlines of the buildings. When you see a dark line next to a building, it is the shadow of that building on the ground. Do not include that in your mappings. 
Best regards and keep mapping
santamariense (2019-06-21 03:33:45+00:00): Dica: Quando estiver no computador, olhe também as ruas sem nome ainda, fazendo uma consulta no overpass: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/aTy . Sabendo onde elas estão, abra para edição, utilize a camada de fundo do IBGE urbano para obter nomenclaturas.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71459836
DiogoBaptista98 (2019-06-24 15:10:11+00:00): Olá,
Fez diversas alterações em arruamentos e com isso criou diversos erros relacionados com rotas de autocarros nas áreas, o que levou a alguma destruição de trabalho já feito. Peço que da próxima vez tenha mais cuidado visto que cada pedaço de rua está relacionado a uma rota, evite conectar bocados de ruas e a alteração da sua estrutura pois isso fará com que as rotas relacionadas sejam destruidas, vou tratar se corrigir os seus erros.
Com os melhores cumprimentos
Diogo Baptista
ruboqif (2019-06-23 08:42:35+00:00): Bonjour, il n'y a pas de bande cyclable à cet endroit. Surtout dans le rond-point de la sortie de l'A51 c'est un trottoir piéton. 
Les bandes de couleur ocre sur les cotés des routes sont des bandes dérasée multifonctionnelles. Elle ne servent pas que au vélo mais aussi aux voitures en cas d'urgence, aux véhicules lents, etc. Il faut mettre comme attribut : "shoulder"
user_5359 (2019-06-21 05:57:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description please have a look on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship
Rainero (2019-06-22 20:40:41+00:00): Hallo JalkobD,

willkommen bei OSM.
Du hast das Häkchen zwecks Überprüfung deiner Änderungen gesetzt. Daher antworte ich hier.

Der Überweg über die Trappentreustraße  sieht gut aus. 
Nur eine Frage zum Rad-/Fußweg entlang der Trappentreustraße: du hast die Attribute bicycle=designated und foot=designated entfernt; besteht da keine Benutzungspflicht mehr? D.h. kein blaues Rad-/Fußweg Schild mehr? Wenn das so ist, ist es auch richtig diese Attribute zu entfernen.

Servus,
Rainer
JakobMunichways (2019-06-22 20:44:10+00:00): Ups, Neulingsfehler! Tschuldigung
seattlefyi (2019-06-20 23:24:46+00:00): Great, thanks for making the change! Welcome to OSM, and hope to see more edits!
user_2842609 (2019-07-22 14:39:19+00:00): Reverted your changes with mixed names.
user_5359 (2019-06-22 08:44:46+00:00): Hello! Please check the tags of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698776558.
abrensch (2019-06-23 08:55:52+00:00): Hallo Lokalfürst,

ich habe diesen und die beiden angrenzenden Änderungssätze, also insgesamt:

71434521 + 71460867 + 71434081

revertiert.

Als Ergebnis Deiner Änderungen war der Parkplatz auf der einen Seite highway=rest_area (und damit nicht routbar) und auf der anderen Seite highway=motorway. Das machte keinen Sinn.

Gruss, Arndt
Lokalfuerst (2019-10-30 16:26:02+00:00): ok, Danke. Dass diese Art highway nicht routbar ist, war mich nicht bekannt.
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-31 10:08:42+00:00): Hallo Eber,

du hast den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/698775654 vor einiger Zeit mit diesem Changeset angelegt. Wie kann ich tracktype=grade5 an dem path hier verstehen? Und wieso hast du noexit=yes getaggt?

Viele Grüße
bhietsch (2020-06-30 14:56:55+00:00): Hey, are these features actually a part of the golf course? If not, they should probably be removed to avoid misleading others
mueschel (2019-06-24 08:44:36+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node - the tagging seems wrong:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6561735291

Thanks
Jan
Glassman (2019-06-21 02:41:54+00:00): FYI - there is a WSDOT basemap available in JOSM. It's Washington Department of Transportation 2017. I'm waiting for the 2018/19 update which is promised by June 30th. Say Hi to everyone on the MS Team.
nathan206 (2019-06-21 14:01:40+00:00): Awesome, I hadn't notice it yet, thanks for the heads up :)   Will we be seeing you at SOTMUS?
Glassman (2019-06-21 15:43:22+00:00): I'm thinking of skipping this year. I love Minneapolis but may not go.
iandees (2019-06-21 16:36:22+00:00): :'-(
WoodWoseWulf (2019-06-21 00:09:03+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM.

Is there a reason why you removed the address interpolation tags located around Handles Peak Way?
mueschel (2019-06-21 11:28:32+00:00): Hi,
it looks like something went wrong here, you added tags like this on 260 objects:
junction:ref:colour_tx=blue = 34

Could you have a look and fix this?
Thanks
Jan
user_5359 (2019-06-22 11:02:23+00:00): The same issue with ref:colour=blue = M51 (only 193 objects).

Could you please fix this also?

Thanks

Georg V.
Luzandro (2025-10-25 13:22:04+00:00): Hallo,

siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5019333 bzgl. der von dir gesetzten access-Werte in dieser Gegend
santamariense (2019-06-21 03:42:34+00:00): Hi. When you find a non-generic street name like "Rua Barão" where there are already street names like Rua 1, Rua 2, (...) ou Rua A, Rua B, (...), you can move these names to old_name and to put the non-generic one to the main name (name=*).
[1] - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/636935072
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71462012
rytheking (2019-06-25 14:12:53+00:00): Thank you! I was wondering if I can apply this as a general rule everywhere in Brazil or just in this area? Thank you for the advice and the information!
santamariense (2019-06-25 17:11:33+00:00): For sure. You can apply it as a general rule everywhere in Brazil. I don't know how it works in another countries, but in Brazil when a new street is opened to give access to new land lots, a generic name is given to it. Some time later a municipal law is created to grant it an official name.
Greg_Rose (2019-06-20 22:35:27+00:00): You can't just stomp over an active HOT project like that. I'm afraid I have to revert your changes
Greg_Rose (2019-06-20 22:36:14+00:00): Disregard - there's a separate project for roads. Got it - sorry about that.
Bobcatchrome (2019-06-20 23:10:46+00:00): 1. Learn how to properly communicate issues. I hope you do not normally go around spitting venom when there are issues with peoples work. 
2. You lack an attention to detail, maybe you should not be validating peoples work. 
3. When you communicate in such a manner you make those of us learning the process not want to VOLUNTEER our time to help map the world. 
4. For someone from the PNW I am disappointed. 
5. Have a good day Greg_Rose
Greg_Rose (2019-06-20 23:45:25+00:00): 1. Based on many highly negative examples of communication I've dealt with here, that was definitely NOT venom. No that's not how I deal with issues usually - that was not a good example. But I at least did not personally INSULT you.
2. Not quite sure what that statement/insult is supposed to mean. My OCD-driven attention to detail is actually what keeps me from being a better validator. Your assertion is silly, at best.
3. I understand, and I will apologize again. I'm sorry.
4. Uh. Okay. Don't know what you've heard about people from the PNW, but it sounds like it's wrong. :p
5. Why thanks.

So what happened is that there are two separate projects for that grid area: One for bldgs, and one for roads/waterways. I forgot which one I was on, tried to save changes, and practically every single way I edited had already been changed.
I realized my mistake after I sent my message to you - I was on the bldgs project and not the roads/waterways. I assumed you had the corresponding area checked out in the other project. My bad - mea culpa ULTIMA culpa.

I actually mean it - have a nice day. 
I truly hope this didn't ruin mapping for you - you sound very upset.
santamariense (2019-06-21 03:46:29+00:00): Dica: Afim de manter o histórico da geometria, você poderia ter excluído as tags somente e não o objeto inteiro e ter aproveitado a geometria para fazer o contorno do prédio.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/71462632
jmapb (2019-06-25 18:03:02+00:00): Hi chachafish -- some of the building's you've tagged as house or detached are actually multi-family apartment buildings -- https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/249948749 for example.
chachafish (2019-06-25 21:30:11+00:00): Thanks. I was trying to be careful with this, but evidently some slipped past my checks. I'm trying to narrow them down better than simply as they were tagged; building=yes. I'll go over this area again in the next couple of days. Feel free to make any changes if the tags are wrong. Cheers.
ralley (2019-06-21 11:26:59+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edits.  Your latest change has some problems around Sunbrae drive.  You've tagged a large stretch of the stream as being in a culvert but it can actually be seen to only enter a short culvert under Sunbrae drive.  Also you have placed a ford on Sunbrae drive.
ianel (2019-06-22 01:36:26+00:00): I'm very much learning the ropes, so thanks for picking that up, I'll be more careful in future.
ralley (2019-06-22 21:49:16+00:00): No problems, thanks for looking into this.  Let me know if you need a hand.  There is also the talk-nz mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz) if you have any questions for local mappers.
ralley (2019-07-01 10:05:04+00:00): Fixed
iWowik (2019-06-21 06:04:28+00:00): День добрый!
А откуда вы берете информацию об адресах домов?
Приглашаю обсудить это на форуме https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=753162#p753162
iWowik (2019-06-25 17:58:28+00:00): В личке вы мне ответили, что из публичной кадастровой карты России и КЛАДР.
А есть ли у вас разрешение от Росреестра брать информацию с кадастровой карты?

В соглашении об использовании ПКК написано следующее:

3. Условия использования

3.1. Публичная кадастровая карта предназначена для использования неограниченным кругом лиц.

3.2. Публичная кадастровая карта размещена на официальном сайте Росреестра в сети Интернет для просмотра Пользователем без подачи запросов и взимания платы.

3.3. Любая информация, размещенная на Публичной кадастровой карте, включая картографические материалы (далее – «Данные»), предназначена исключительно для некоммерческого использования.

3.4. Любое копирование Данных, воспроизведение, переработка, распространение, размещение в свободном доступе (опубликование) в сети Интернет, любое использование в средствах массовой информации и/или в коммерческих целях без предварительного письменного разрешения правообладателя запрещается, за исключением случаев, прямо предусмотренных настоящим Соглашением.

3.5. Данные защищены законодательством о защите информации и интеллектуальной собственности.
Инна Тапилина (2019-06-25 19:21:03+00:00): Я просто проживаю в данном районе и никаких коммерческих целей не преследую.