piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Tchoupitoulas (2019-09-19 01:18:09+00:00): Tom. Hello. I see what you are suggesting there and looks like a reasonable extension, but there can be road quality concerns on unpaved roads through narrow residential areas which is why I did not add the road. Thank you for that feedback, I will extend this road.
WillyGarcia (2019-09-24 23:07:45+00:00): Why did you change Beehive to a tourist attraction? It is a natural geyser just like the other springs, geysers, and so on in the area. I believe this should be reverted, as with the other update. Happy to read your thoughts though!
michael_f_osm (2019-09-27 07:40:34+00:00): It is of course a natural geyser but a tourist attraction as well, so for me it was very difficult to decide. Greetings Michael
WillyGarcia (2019-10-09 16:58:07+00:00): Fair enough! Cheers friend.
freebeer (2019-10-09 19:19:03+00:00): the problem is that a tourist attraction is very broad and can cover virtually anything, and gives no clue as to what it really is, and is widely abused in osm.

natural=geyser is far more specific and accurately describes the feature so that someone seeking such things can find it without having to wade through bubbling mud also tagged as a tourist attraction should someone decide to tag things based on potential tourist interest.
Carnildo (2019-09-18 20:48:15+00:00): Would "leisure=fishing" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=fishing) be a reasonable tag for this?
chnav (2019-10-04 06:47:09+00:00): Очередной Кызылординский вандал. Откат всех правок.
Fake mapping. Full revert.
chnav (2019-09-19 05:40:37+00:00): Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста не рисуйте фиктивные объекты. В ОСМ рисуется только то, что присутствует на местности.

Правка откачена полностью.
Sosha1996 (2019-09-24 09:13:39+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «پارک» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Sosha1996 (2019-09-24 09:13:31+00:00): بخاطر ویرایش‌هایی که روی نقشه میزنید ازتون ممنونم.
اما طبق قوانین اوپن‌استریت مپ، شما باید یک توضیح مناسب در کامنت چنجست در مورد تغییراتی که در چنجستتون اعمال کردید بنویسید.
ننوشتن توضیحات یا نوشتن فقط یک کلمه مانند «پارک» یا مواردی از این دست، غیرقابل قبول می‌باشد.

همچنین اگر تغییراتی میدید که سطح یک شهر یا یک منطقه وسیع رو در بر میگیره، باید اون رو در چندین چنجست بارگذاری کنید. بارگذاری این حجم از تغییرات در یک چنجست غیر قابل قبول می‌باشد.

از این به بعد در صورت رعایت نکردن نکات بالا، این پیغام روی چنجست و صندوق پیام خود مشاهده خواهید کرد. در صورت نادیده گرفتن این پیغام و جواب ندادن به اون، حساب شما گزارش خواهد شد.(البته این یک تهدید نیست. ما سعی داریم این رویه اشتباه رو تصحیح کنیم و امیدواریم که شما این رو درک کنید)

لطفا این متن را مطالعه کنید:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Good_changeset_comments

——————————————————————
Hi,
Thank you for helping improve OSM data in Iran, you're uploading very large number of changes in to the map on a regular basis and to help other people who are monitoring the map changes(like officials frome Data Group or Community Admins), to understand what is happening in your change sets, it's appropriate to leave a detailed changeset comments.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Lamichhane (2020-09-05 13:37:04+00:00): HI, mapper you mapped well but i found some issues in your building ie you are sharing the same common boundary for the two building, If you are unable to make apart then map and use UnGlue ways tool which is availabe in jsom, Thank you
aharvey (2019-09-19 02:47:10+00:00): Roads are assumed to be two way unless specified as oneway. Specifying oneway=no is not harmful, but not needed unless you want to be explicit or if it's unclear and you want to indicate to other mappers this really is two way even though it might look like oneway.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-10-11 13:26:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 75566632 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some doodles and other fake data.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75482205 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3204 .
eggie (2019-09-18 11:38:06+00:00): Oke..., maar nu heb je 'm weggehaald. 
Wanneer er nog niets te zien is wordt iets soms als proposed getagd. Zijn ze er aan bezig dat gebruik je construction tags zie wiki.
Dus nu zelf in de gaten houden svp.
Je kunt ook de voorgaande mapper vragen naar het hoe en wat.
GobboE (2019-09-24 09:38:53+00:00): No problem. De brug is niet in planning, noch aanbouw. Er was een wild plan van B&W: maar die heeft het nog niet gehaald
user_5359 (2019-09-18 15:47:09+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You can add your shop to the building if there is another shop in the building.
s8evq (2019-11-25 09:48:51+00:00): Beste A67-A67, je hebt hier network:type=node_network toegevoegd. Maar dit is geen echte node network. Onderweg staan er geen bordjes naar de volgende node. Dit is eigenlijk een streek GR met onderweg gewoon bepaalde vaste punten. Ik verwijder terug die network:type=node_network
s8evq (2019-11-25 09:51:00+00:00): Ik zie nu dat dit ook toegevoegd is op alle nodes... nogal een werk om dit terug te verwijderen. Misschien doe ik het later wel.
eggie (2019-09-18 11:31:45+00:00): Zelfde verhaal.. Zet de crossing desnoods op een node. paden die nergens heenlpen heeft geen zin. Ook hier 8 waarschuwingen voor crossing ways.
eggie (2019-09-18 11:35:19+00:00): Die crossings bij de lange Gracht kunnen wel, maar of je er veel aan hebt qua routering?
Vaak zitten trottoirs als tag opgenomen in het fietspad 
met sidewalk=right of left
Dat zie je bij wegen voor autoverkeer ook. Er zijn kaarten die laten die trootoirs dan zien. De standaardkaart niet.
Eggie
GobboE (2019-09-24 09:40:34+00:00): ok, helder. dank
eggie (2019-09-18 11:28:36+00:00): Die voetpaden lopen nergens heen. parallelvoetpaden worden in principe niet ingetekend. Ik denk dat het beter is als je de crossing op een node zet die verbonden is met de hoofdrijbaan. Dat kan ook. 
Nu heeft het allemaal geen functie en routeert toch niet.
Kijk nog even. 
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-09-18 11:29:55+00:00): Kijk ook bij de waarschuwingen. crossing_ways 4  Dat betekent dat je de wegen niet hebt verbonden dmv een node met de hoofdrijbaan.
Advies.. Weg met die paden en zet de crossings op een node.
Gr Eggie
eggie (2019-09-18 11:26:05+00:00): Oke. Die mast zal daar niet staan, maar waarschijnlijk wel op het gebouw. Daar staan er nog meer.
Het is een bulkimport uit 2009 en wellicht toch niet meer actueel. Overigens geen ramp dat die weg is.
MVG,
Eggie
rayleigh1 (2019-09-18 18:50:59+00:00): Thank you for the map addition. Could you changeset comments be a bit more specific though?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74619670
Pixxlic (2019-09-19 08:22:52+00:00): This ATM wasn´t plotted on the map
rayleigh1 (2019-09-20 14:28:47+00:00): I just mean something like "Added an ATM" instead of just "Addition".
Pixxlic (2019-09-23 12:54:34+00:00): OK, I'll do better
Recoil16 (2019-09-18 11:06:24+00:00): (Tempo 30 Zone hinzugefügt)
eggie (2019-09-18 11:23:01+00:00): Dag GobboE.. Lijkt mij oke.
Gr Eggie
SomeoneElse (2019-09-20 00:01:54+00:00): Hello,
Would it be possible to give a bit more detail than jus "corrections" here?  It would help other mappers see what has changed.  They can perhaps use something like https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74620129 , but it'd be much easier if there was a changeset comment explaining the changes.
One more thing - I notice that you've moved https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/498461889 across to the other side of the road.  My recollection here is that there are actually laybies on both sides of the road here.
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2019-09-20 00:02:46+00:00): Salut,
Ar fi posibil să oferim un pic mai multe detalii decât jus „corrections” aici? Ar ajuta alți mapari să vadă ce s-a schimbat. Poate că pot folosi ceva de genul https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74620129, dar ar fi mult mai ușor dacă ar exista un comentariu de schimb care să explice modificările.
Încă un lucru - observ că ați mutat https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/498461889 pe partea cealaltă a drumului. Amintirea mea aici este că aici sunt de fapt labați pe ambele părți ale drumului.
Toate cele bune,
Andy
Jordi MF (2019-09-18 15:00:26+00:00): Hola,
Gracias por mejorar la base de datos de OpenStreetMap. Desde la comunidad española de OSM hemos visto que has modificado diversas áreas peatonales o plazas para etiquetarlas como leisure=park. Ten en cuenta que en OSM un "parque" es un área grande, con vegetación semisilvestre y donde se pueden realizar múltiples actividades de ocio (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=park?uselang=en). Las zonas que tú has mapeado como "parque" no encajan en esa descripción. Realmente, las zonas que has modificado se tratan de áreas peatonales con bancos, alguna zona ajardinada y algún árbol. Por favor, consulta la wiki de OSM donde se describen detalladamente las diferentes etiquetas.

Estaría bien que fueses tú mismo quien corrigiese los elementos. Es tentador "pintar" el mapa de parques para que se vean zonas ajardinadas en las que se ensancha el espacio público para el peatón, pero eso no lo convierte en un parque según las convenciones de OSM. Tratemos de seguir los criterios definidos en la wiki.
Muchas gracias y te animamos a seguir mejorando OSM.
Saludos,
Jordi

PD: Hace poco, hemos tenido una conversación con otro usuario tratando el mismo tema. Por favor, léelo para más detalles: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74525920
osmviborg (2019-09-18 12:21:18+00:00): Nu kunne man jo så foranlediges til at tro at Tjørring kun er den klat huse du har markeret her. Det er virkelig langt fra sandheden. Din iver efter at tilføje oplysninger på polygoner går ofte for vidt, som i dette tilfælde.
Hjart (2019-09-18 12:29:13+00:00): Hvad med at rette det i stedet for at beklage dig på den måde?
osmviborg (2019-09-18 12:47:51+00:00): Det jeg prøver på at sige er, at det var meget bedre hvis bydele (og byer) var markeret med en node, og ikke et område. Specielt når man ikke kender den nøjagtige udstrækning på området.
Hjart (2019-09-18 12:58:46+00:00): Min erfaring er områder er bedre hvis man med rimelig sikkerhed kan fastlægge dem.
osmviborg (2019-09-18 13:10:08+00:00): Hvis meningen er at navne skal forsvinde fra Mapnik, så har du ret.
Hjart (2019-09-18 13:38:02+00:00): Det var ikke det der var meningen.
osmviborg (2019-09-18 13:56:05+00:00): Men det er det der sker. SDFE Skærmkort løser problemet, i editoren. Men stadig voldsomt irriterende.
Jordi MF (2019-09-18 15:10:27+00:00): Hola, 
Siguiendo los mismos criterios indicados en el comentario del otro changeset (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/74620286), la Plaça del Xúquer, no es ningún parque. Es una plaza peatonal con zonas ajardinadas. Las zonas ajardinadas deben mapearse de forma individual. Algunos usuarios usan la etiqueta leisure=garden para las zonas ajardinadas, mientras que otros usuarios prefieren mapear cada uno de los árboles por separado (tarea difícil de llevar a cabo de forma perfecta). En este caso, también se podría mapear el seto.
En cualquier caso, no es adecuado mapear las plazas como leisure=park ya que no se trata de un área semisilvestre ni extensa.
Me dispongo a revertir este cambio, pero te animamos a seguir mejorando los datos de OSM.
Saludos,
Jordi
s8evq (2019-09-18 15:10:47+00:00): Dag Annvano, bedankt voor je aanpassingen. Op basis van welke gegevens heb je het pad aangepast? De ligging van het pad was eigenlijk behoorlijk precies gemapt, gebruik makend van het AIV Digitaal hoogtemodel (skyview), waarmee je relief door de bomen kunt zien, en de paadjes heel nauwkeurig kunt tekenen. Ik weet niet of dit in de editor ID beschikbaar is, maar in ieder geval zeker in JOSM. Ik heb alvast de geometry van het pad terug aangepast.
eggie (2019-09-18 11:41:14+00:00): Let op.. Adressen zijn uniek en bevinden zich al op de adresnode. Niet nogmaals een adres toevoegen. 
Het adres staat nu zelfs 3x in de database. De naam De Meerpaal 2x. Dus naam van het gebouw halen en kijken of er al een adresnode is. Adressen verwijderen.
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-18 11:51:02+00:00): Zie voor scholen en kinderdagverblijven https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=school?uselang=nl
GobboE (2019-09-24 09:43:57+00:00): ah, helder. Ik vroeg het me al af. Bij inzoomen kreeg ik de tags, en die heb ik verwijderd, maar de diepere laag ontging me. dank!
Sanniu (2019-10-02 11:29:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6805366768 or https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6822584990 is part of duplicated line, seems like an auto-import failure.  Can you fix that, please?
OrDal (2019-10-02 13:10:18+00:00): Thanks! fixed on changeset #75188301
eggie (2019-09-18 11:50:26+00:00): Hier is nog veel te doen...  zie vorige feedback. Ot en Sien  is dat wel een amenity=school?
eggie (2019-09-18 11:53:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

Bedrijven taggen we bij op de adresnodes. dus niet op de gebouwen zelf. De bedrijfsnaam is niet de naam van een gebouw. Het adres bevindt zich als node in het gebouw. SVP Geen adressen aanmaken in OSM.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-09-18 11:56:14+00:00): Verder op de node toevoegen 
office=company
Dan rendert ook de naam op de adresnode.
eggie (2019-09-18 12:05:35+00:00): adres verwijderd info samengevoegd met adresnode
szydzio (2019-10-05 10:38:21+00:00): Where did you take those names from?
You must be aware that the polish community considers your changeset a vandalism.
Unless you provide a reliable source your changeset will be reverted.
Spree42 (2019-10-05 12:21:13+00:00): I did not want to offend anyone! The names where used in OSM based offline maps for a scenario game and where not supposed to be published to OSM. I reverted the names right away.
szydzio (2019-10-05 18:44:56+00:00): Thanks! What about the rest of your changes - the (number) names of building and changing the classes of roads like the case here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/67154660/history ? These changes should be reverted as well.
szydzio (2019-10-05 18:46:19+00:00): If you need a customized map based on OSM but not uploading direct to OSM main database consider using UMap => https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/UMap
Spree42 (2019-10-05 19:44:34+00:00): thanks for the tip... will look into it. The "names" of the buildings (the numbering) are based on a detailed map of the entire factory area. I suppose it is based on the real estate registry. The map also contained all the buildings as well as the railroads (now dysfunctional). I synced the map with satellite images and I have been to the area a couple of times. Regarding the categories of roads I categorized trails as highway=path. The "main roads" (mostly concrete plates) I categorized as highway=secondary. There are also many really small kind of access roads which do not really have pavement but are wider than a trail. More like a forrest road. I categorized those as highway=service. To be honest I am still struggling how to tag the roads since most of the tags in the wiki do not quite fit reality.
szydzio (2019-10-06 16:13:03+00:00): What kind of a map was it that you based those numbers on? Are you sure its data was compatible with the OSM OdbL-licence => https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_and_Legal_FAQ#Can_I_copy_from_google_or_other_similar_sources.3F regarding copyright? Please note that only out of copyright data may uploaded into OSM database. Regarding buildings the official polish real estate registry only shows the buildings currently named from 41 to 48. As to the class of streets - secondary in this case is definitely wrong. If you refer to the wiki-page for a secondary road => https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsecondary , you’ll see a road has to form a link in the national route network to be secondary. In Poland this is usually the case for a 3digit wojewódzka road (something like 3digit Landstrasse in Germany). I will change the streets back to unclassified later.
Spree42 (2019-10-09 05:33:21+00:00): Of course. I am pretty sure it matches the license, but will double check with the source to make sure. I did not copy the map 1:1, just used it for reference in order to make sense of the sat images.
szydzio (2019-10-09 14:27:28+00:00): I’m glad you would do that :)
But still the numbers in tag 'name' of the buildings have to be moved to 'ref', see => https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref . A name for a building in OSM means a distinguished feature something like this case=> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114423781 . I will move the names to ref later.
Hjart (2019-09-18 12:35:41+00:00): When mapping in Denmark please open the editor in Denmark. That way the editor will select the best and newest aerial imagery
ma-rt-in (2019-09-18 21:46:34+00:00): Hallo,
der Wünschewagen des ASB ist keine Einrichtung im eigentlichen Sinne sondern eine Dienstleistung. Oder befindet sich hier ein Büro für diese Dienstleistung?
vg
Also (2019-09-18 11:52:53+00:00): wrong comment, 
connected residential highway with
香港街
NGL-engel (2019-11-28 20:44:14+00:00): Hallo Peter, 
   mir ist aufgefallen das auf der Osmose-Karte die Radroute als Fehler angezeigt wird. https://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=15&lat=52.94442&lon=7.86415&item=xxxx&level=1&tags=&fixable=
Ich habe selber keine Ahnung warum. Könnte es an den Klammern im Namen liegen? - (Das ist aber nur geraten :-) 
Wäre nett wenn Du dem Fehler auf den Grund gehen könntest. 
Gruß
    Angela
Peter Elderson (2019-11-28 20:52:44+00:00): It's the route tag. It should not contain the name of the route, but the mode of transport, so route=bicycle
Peter Elderson (2019-11-28 20:53:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Cycle_routes_.28also_mountain_bike.29
user_5359 (2019-09-18 17:41:51+00:00): Hello! Please check the key access value of https://www.osm.org/way/725839758
kirrawat (2019-09-19 08:47:55+00:00): Hi George,

Thanks for your response. Apologies for the error. I've corrected the access under changeset 74660189 

Regards,
kirrawat.
Hjart (2019-09-18 12:33:25+00:00): Når du laver cykelstier o lign. vær da opmærksom på vores vejledning: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning
dktue (2020-10-01 16:17:31+00:00): Ist diese Baustelle noch vorhanden? Als opening_date ist der 01.09.2020 eingetragen.
Männedorf (2020-10-02 19:42:18+00:00): Ja, aber neustens soll die Eröffnung ab November 2020 schrittweise erfolgen.
user_5359 (2019-09-18 17:39:53+00:00): Hello! Please check the restriction relation https://www.osm.org/relation/10050362, https://www.osm.org/relation/10050363, https://www.osm.org/relation/10050364
akalohri (2019-09-19 09:38:29+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your suggestion.Apologies for the mistake.I have fixed this changeset #74662300.
Let me know if you have any other suggestions.

Regards,
akalohri.
*Martin* (2019-09-20 06:41:47+00:00): ahoj. cestam v lese z bingu/maxaru by som grade5 nedaval, podla mna budu min grade4. alebo nedaval tracktype vobec :-)
glglgl (2019-09-19 08:53:16+00:00): Are you sure that this part of the boundary was supposed to be deleted?
viloan (2019-09-18 12:32:40+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-09-18 13:04:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
letihu (2019-10-31 09:49:47+00:00): Hallo,
die Brücke
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/725847452/history
ist sehr gut! Du solltest aber die Straße auftrennen, damit nicht beides über das Wasser gemappt ist.Ich habe dass hier schon mal erledigt.

Ich wünsche dir noch viel Spaß bei OSM, und lass dich bitte von meinem Hinweis nicht entmutigen.
eggie (2019-09-18 13:13:43+00:00): Wanneer het restaurant weg is. kan amenity=restaurant ook weg. source=BAG hoort echter bij de adresnode van het Kadaster.
MVG,
Eggie
Dit zijn je edits
eggie (2019-09-18 13:13:48+00:00): https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=74624597
arndjan (2019-09-18 13:17:02+00:00): Er zit nu ook weer een restaurant, maar ik moet even gaan kijken hoe het heet. Vandaar dat ik 'restaurant' had laten staan.
eggie (2019-09-18 13:23:36+00:00): Oke Arndjan..  de regel source=BAG kun je evt dan ook weer toevoegen. Dat is weer van belang voor periodieke imports vanuit het Kadaster.
Gr eggie
maferikotupi (2020-08-24 19:42:10+00:00): Bonjour
Attention quand vous retravaillez les carrefours ; vous aviez mis une partie de la promenade de reculée en sens unique.
;-)
Duja (2019-09-18 14:46:40+00:00): Samo da napomenem da nisi trebao gubiti vreme na preslovljavanje naziva administrativnih granica -- ne renderuju se apsolutno nigde, a većinu sam dodao ja samo radi sopstvenog lakšeg unosa. Kad budeš stigao, molim te preslovi administrativne relacije nivoa 9 u Vojvodini, tu sam malo zabušavao. Pozdrav.
mpele (2019-09-19 04:16:32+00:00): На које тачно администривне границе мислиш?
И можеш ли да ми укратко објасниш шта радиш - баш си ме заинтересовао? Унео си велики број административних граница само да би теби било лакше да уносиш - шта то уносиш да би оправдао унос административних граница?
tux67 (2019-09-18 13:23:58+00:00): Sieht gut aus ;-)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/74626314
Hjart (2019-09-18 13:58:27+00:00): Jeg har slettet dette idet stedet i forvejen var med på kortet: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/60393293
Septi9999 (2019-09-18 13:41:27+00:00): Acest drum DN16 a fost asfaltat acum aproximatix o luna si poti sa mergi linistit cu 90 km/h(se poate merge si peste 90km/h,asta pentru vitezomani) de la iesirea din Craiesti in jud Mures pana la Silivasu de Campie.Dupa localitatea silivasu de Campie drum e exact asa cum arata asa care dau culoare galben