piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MichNicole (2016-12-07 16:59:34+00:00): This is the image that we took on the ground. It may or may not be closed.  We cannot tell from the image.  If it is closed down, adding a closed tag would be appropriate.  Thank you for your input and valuable local knowledge.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=RdclMnmdZ6lhKHbrfopMtA&focus=photo
muralito (2016-12-07 18:30:02+00:00): The image is right. The building is there and it's not closed, it is in working condition and it is operated by "Banco Republica" (i think for their internal use like archiving documents), but no financial services are offered there.  They offer services in sites listed here https://www.portal.brou.com.uy/web/guest/institucional/red-fisica/montevideo
user_5359 (2016-12-03 11:52:07+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-03 11:50:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
johanemilsson (2017-04-20 18:41:47+00:00): Hi,

Looks like you've changed the name of Farwaniya Governorate to Street 131. Is this correct?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4579479

/Johan
Canyonsrcool (2017-04-20 18:51:29+00:00): That is a mistake, thank you for catching that. I will fix it.
elotrojames (2016-12-04 00:39:59+00:00): Hola Jorge, con el cambio (changeset: 44130520) eliminó el nodo 3333003843 que corresponde con la parada del tren, este nodo está asociado a las relaciones que describen las rutas del tren cartago-chepe, chepe-cartago, oeste-este y este-oeste. 

El comentario de su cambio dice "actualización" pero no me queda muy claro la razón de eliminar el nodo y por eso este mensaje.
Jorge_Chinchilla (2016-12-04 05:04:31+00:00): Hola elotrojames, ayer ingresé la calle trasera sur de acceso al Indoor, probablemente por error eliminé ese nodo. Te agradezco me indiques si hiciste la correción o cómo puedo hacer el cambio para no afectar la vialidad del tren. Saludos. Jorge.
elotrojames (2016-12-05 15:09:03+00:00): Hola Jorge. Agregué de vuelta el nodo y lo reincorporé a las relaciones de las rutas del tren. Gracias por la respuesta.
user_5359 (2016-12-03 11:22:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
yasunari (2017-05-25 13:01:38+00:00): どうして現地確認なく、既存のウェイを削除されるのでしょうか？
非常に残念です。
shirasayu (2017-06-28 08:24:03+00:00): すみません。編集を始めたばかりの頃でよく確認せずに消していました。
航空写真だけを見て道であろう場所のみトレースしていたと思います。
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:30:41+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! En ook n iet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:37:02+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:29:28+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:37:14+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
silversurfer83 (2023-12-02 22:15:49+00:00): Howdy :)

I'm just scrolling the desert out of curiousity and found this
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57840968
where none of the three aerial images JOSM offers shows anything at all.
Has there been something here and now there's just data left?

cheers
silversurfer83
osm_saint-louis (2023-12-02 22:19:43+00:00): What do you want to tell me and - possibly - to the world?
silversurfer83 (2023-12-02 22:23:20+00:00): I'm simply asking if you possibly remember there being anything since you added an area "landuse=industrial" and now there's nothing to be seen. Maybe you're still able to say what you did see. Sadly there's no source given in the CS and no comment either so I have to ask, don't I?
silversurfer83 (2023-12-03 20:53:38+00:00): Oh boy. I pasted the wrong link to what I was talking about. My mistake, I'm sorry.

I was referring to this landuse=industrial in the desert
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457386774

I must have mixed that up yesterday when I was doing QA work
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:29:39+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:37:41+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:28:51+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!!
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
user_5359 (2016-12-03 10:42:59+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Kredytow (2020-11-10 17:10:15+00:00): One of your buildings has a duplicate https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457391237/history
SK53 (2022-10-03 13:42:06+00:00): Hi Risteárd,

Is the cycleway mapped crossing Vaughan Way outside Highcross accurate now? Looks inconsistent with aerial imagery. I haven't been this way since all the construction started, so am out-of-date.

Jerry aka SK53
Risteárd (2022-10-05 21:49:40+00:00): Hi Jerry

It doesn't look right to me from a patchy memory of cycling through it a few weeks ago. The (Bing) aerial imagery doesn't seem to be up-to-date as the council rebuilt it to incorporate a wide 'super-crossing'. It's handy for me so I'll try to remember to take a closer look.

Risteárd
user_5359 (2016-12-03 11:44:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Kredytow (2020-11-10 17:10:13+00:00): One of your buildings has a duplicate https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/457387382/history
user_5359 (2016-12-03 11:43:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Why did you delete the tag highway from the Edwards Mill Road?
DaveF (2016-12-04 12:33:29+00:00): Hi camarones

Is the surface really asphalt? They're usually grit. Isn't it also a loop so they can do more than one circuit?
camarones (2016-12-04 18:26:59+00:00): The pump track was resurfaced last week and is now all asphalt http://wideopenmag.co.uk/tag/brunel-way-pumptrack .The trace does also need adjusting
DaveF (2016-12-04 18:36:33+00:00): Ah, OK. Good for longevity, I suppose, but I thought half the fun was to go as fast as possible without the rear sliding way from under you.
bubix (2016-12-03 12:37:47+00:00): Come l'hai rilevata l'altezza? Dalla CTR?
sabas88 (2016-12-03 12:39:07+00:00): Sto provando un estratto della CTR della regione :-)
bubix (2016-12-03 12:39:50+00:00): ti dai al render 3d?
sabas88 (2016-12-03 12:40:20+00:00): Vediamo come viene su f4map domani!
trigpoint (2016-12-03 18:39:50+00:00): Are you sure about the spelling?
afrihagen (2016-12-05 18:00:54+00:00): eh, yes: http://www.whitemustache.co.uk/
jeka p (2016-12-28 07:44:39+00:00): Привіт!
години роботи потрібно вводити в певному форматі. Я виправив (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4266912207/history).

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 20:37:19+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 20:39:55+00:00): Misschien zou je dit gedenkteken nog kunnen aanvullen. Maps.Me is niet erg volledig in de mogelijkheden.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial
Commodoortje (2017-01-15 20:41:49+00:00): Het zou namelijk kunnen zijn dat het geen memorial is, maar (een) kunstobject(en)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dartwork
Prince Kassad (2016-12-03 11:58:10+00:00): Moin, du hattest mit diesem Edit die Relation nicht gelöscht, sondern nur alle Eigenschaft entfernt, die Relation aber sonst gelassen. Ich hab da nachgeholfen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44135368 Hoffe, das war in deinem Sinne.
Karthoo (2016-12-03 12:02:46+00:00): Ja, hatte dich sogar im Forum darauf angeschrieben. Also ja, die Linie gibts nicht mehr und ich wusste nicht genau wie ich sie entfernen kann.
DenisJu (2016-12-12 00:04:23+00:00): Përshëndetje! 
Mund ta rishikosh këtë piketim në sheshin "Avni Rustemi" të lutem? 
Changset "3325958612, v5" 
Mbase ka keqkuptim vendndodhja!
Владимир К (2018-02-28 08:11:00+00:00): здесь живет ваш друг?
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:37:52+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
TheSwavu (2017-01-11 01:35:08+00:00): Gauge rather than Guage?
trigpoint (2016-12-03 17:21:11+00:00): Hi, please could you make your changeset comments a bit more meaningful, Added Additional Information say absolutely nothing.
Also please don't join landuse polygons to the centreline of the road. It makes the map harder to maintain. and landuse stops at the edge of the road.
Thanks Phil
Mateusz Konieczny (2019-04-21 07:33:05+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1752173 ?
Leonmvd (2016-12-03 13:15:39+00:00): Op basis van snelle survey en plattegrond van arriva https://www.arriva.nl/web/file?uuid=bc69cad9-5c15-406b-a3c5-81cfa0a3cfdb&owner=af8aec32-6c73-47d5-af4d-f1553a2c3b77&contentid=1384
Commodoortje (2017-01-10 09:10:02+00:00): Is noodzaak om dezelfde naam 9x te plaatsen, of is dit een vergissing. Als het noodzakelijk is vind ik het ok.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zsf2i7og4gtuvl6/2017-01-10_09-48-35.png?raw=1
Leonmvd (2017-01-10 11:51:37+00:00): Ik heb het voorbeeld van andere stations gevolgd bijv: http://www.openstreetmap.org/search?query=hoogkerk%20transferium#map=19/53.19771/6.51361
marczoutendijk (2017-01-10 14:10:04+00:00): Maar daar moeten natuurlijk de letters komen te staan die de platformen aangeven A-H. Want hier hebben reizigers niet veel aan...
marczoutendijk (2017-01-10 14:12:17+00:00): Kijk ook nog even hier, vanaf post #37:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=34039&p=2
EneaSuper (2016-12-03 17:57:53+00:00): Non c'è bisogno che sia dia un nome alle cassette postali u.u
user_5359 (2016-12-03 17:24:32+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Warin61 (2017-06-18 23:28:20+00:00): Relation 6759112 was better off as 2 separate buildings .. the height details are better that way and relations don't like shared segments.
Warin61 (2017-06-18 23:35:56+00:00): Arr .. it is one building - 2 heights. 
use http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building:part
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:38:13+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
Владимир К (2017-04-04 08:15:39+00:00): не надо сокращений в названии. принято писать полностью "озеро". либо не писать вовсе
Constable (2016-12-06 11:03:51+00:00): Ciao, posso chiederti gentilmente di aggiungere un commento prima di salvare le modifiche? Chiedo perché mi capita di mappare in questa zona e mi fa comodo avere un'idea generale delle modifiche apportate da un changeset senza dover guardare nel dettaglio tutte le way ed i nodi modificati dallo stesso.
Grazie mille
Ciao
Ardu84 (2016-12-06 21:09:12+00:00): Non ho ben capito cosa intendi come "commento" ma penso che più che tracciare ciò di cui sono sicuro e apportare modifiche a ciò che so di per certo essere in errore non faccio. 
Ad ogni modo d'ora in poi cercherò di motivare quel che inserisco/modifico anche se non l'ho mai fatto prima ed è da anni che "traccio" qui.
Comunque grazie per avermi avvertito.
Constable (2016-12-15 11:52:49+00:00): Ciao, scusa il ritardo, intendevo questo: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Grazie per la collaborazione, buona continuazione
Ciao
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:38:29+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! 
En ook niet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
FTA_dwg_archived (2016-12-05 05:23:25+00:00): Hi, You made a lot of changes to what islands that countries are under. Additionally you added a lot of detail that is not available on default imagery sources. Please do not modify the de facto borders in OSM without consulting other mappers in the local community. Also be sure to include your imagery sources in the future so we know where the data come from. Thanks, FTA
机器翻译
嗨，你对国家所在的岛屿做了很多改变。 此外，您添加了许多默认图像来源不可用的详细信息。 请不要修改OSM中的事实边界，而无需咨询本地社区中的其他映射器。 此外，请务必在未来添加您的图片来源，以便我们知道数据来自哪里。
谢谢，FTA
gileri (2016-12-03 14:43:35+00:00): Erreur de source, ça devrait être : source=https://www.facebook.com/toruteashop/
BohdanKuts (2017-08-04 04:20:32+00:00): Доброго дня.
Не правильно доданий/не існуючий об'єкт. Що саме Ви намагалися зробити, створюючи цей об'єкт?
Pidlisnyi (2017-08-04 08:40:15+00:00): Доброго дня,  так намагався створити новий обєкт.
BohdanKuts (2017-08-05 04:16:29+00:00): Ем... який саме? В цьому ченджсеті Ви створили об'єкт-точку park з ім'ям "На острові". Не схоже, щоб у цьому місці існував такий об'єкт. Чи можливо Ви мали на увазі щось інше?
Pidlisnyi (2017-08-05 08:43:38+00:00): Саме так !в цьму місці парк ! Для відпочинку , альтанка , вогнище , краєвиди , річка .
BohdanKuts (2017-08-05 11:08:09+00:00): Зрозуміло. Коментар до ченджсету просто зовсім не вдалий. Трохи підредагую об'єкт відповідно до прийнятих технік (після того, як перевірю його фактичне місце знаходження).
Дякую за Вашу відповідь.
Rini1 (2017-02-11 13:47:12+00:00): Hallo kallies1
Respekt du warst schneller! 
Bitte Ergänze noch die Details zur Str.
Fügst du die neuen Gebäude hinzu ?? 
Grüße aus Rheinheim
user_5359 (2016-12-04 09:31:58+00:00): Welcome to OSM !Unfortunately, your website has a bug (GoDaddy problem?), so that the nature of your business can not determine.
jaap de vries (2016-12-15 14:03:19+00:00): Waarom heb je deze aangemaakt, Apple store onroad (4535772492, v1) ? 
Dit is nvt voor osm en het wordt ook wel kaartvervuiling genoemd. Ik heb deze dan ook verwijderd.
alphensebezorger (2016-12-03 18:26:59+00:00): Hallo Marc,

Volgens mij is het "boompjes-probleem" eenvoudiger op te lossen. De omvattende (multi)polygon (met de naam Clingenbosch) moet gewoon geen tag landuse=forest hebben. De erbinnen liggende stukjes hebben al de juiste tags (gras, bos, water) zo te zien. Dan is alleen nog de vraag welke tag je de omhullende polygon geeft behalve name=Clingenbosch. Toponym=park/forest o.i.d?
Groet, Alphensebezorger.
P.S. Idem voor Groot Haesebroek, Ivicke, Witeenburg...
marczoutendijk (2016-12-03 18:37:05+00:00): Dat heb ik geprobeerd, maar het leverde (nog) niet het gewenste resultaat op.  De vermelding toponym (die er in het verleden opstond) werkt ook niet goed. Ik ben aan het werk ermee!
alphensebezorger (2016-12-03 19:04:33+00:00): Misschien dan toch maar leisure=park? Geeft wel een lelijke kleur groen in Mapnik, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/36988583.
marczoutendijk (2016-12-03 19:41:02+00:00): Ik heb nu de outer als forest, en alle inners die als forest stonden genoteerd, verwijderd. Ook de overige multi's gereduceerd. Even kijken hoed dat eruit ziet!
marczoutendijk (2016-12-03 20:22:40+00:00): Het ziet er nu goed uit. Overigens is wel de vraag of de kleine perceeltjes gras die er nu nog staan, ook echt gras zijn. Vergeleken met cyclomedia zou ik zeggen: allemaal bos!
highflyer74 (2016-12-05 10:11:24+00:00): Hi there!

Is there any place where these imports have been discussed? I am just asking this, as your account is quite new and usually it is not the first action for a new OSM member to do large scale imports in several states. In addition to that some of the buildings have bad geometry (not rectangular) and also still have the source:fid=* tag on them which is not a regular OSM key.

Thanks for letting the community know!
osm_rucksackradar (2016-12-06 14:15:22+00:00): Hi, you are right. Another user gave me advice to announce large imports earlier. I will do that in the future on Slack  https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/ and on talk-us. 
I addressed the geometry problem manually, the problem is that many buildings have different shapes than rectangle, for example there are lots of silos. I corrected them manually with "q" or "o" on Josm, but some might still look a little bit odd.
The fid tag is the connection to the county dataset. I left it for further corrections.
Michael
highflyer74 (2016-12-06 14:34:16+00:00): Hi Michael!

Thanks for your quick reply! Concerning the building shape: I was referring to buildings that are actually rectangular. I stumbled across some that were not corrected. I am not sure, as I am not a license specialist, but you might run into major problems if the license under which the data is published does not fit OSM needs. Also before importing data, the quality of the data has to be assessed. All those processes which have to be followed are laid out here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import. If you did not follow those rules, you might have your data removed from OSM again. I am not sure if Slack and talk-us is enough... You might want to check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines.

Oliver
Nakaner (2016-12-06 16:10:23+00:00): Hi Oliver,

the Talk-us mailing list is not sufficient. See step 2.2 of the Import Guidelines available at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines#Step_2_-_Community_Buy-in. In addition, I want to point out that Slack is not even mentioned by the Import Guideline and no official communication channel – it is used by an organization calling themself "OpenStreetMap US".

Please don't edit the objects you imported because they will be removed (and your modifications would be removed, too).

@highflyer74: I have asked DWG to do the revert of the whole import.

Best regards

Michael
woodpeck (2016-12-06 16:49:41+00:00): I would also like to point out that the guidelines do not talk about *announcing* an import; they talk about discussing it and assuring the community is happy for the import to go ahead. A mere announcement is certainly not enough. I'm afraid these edits will have to be reverted.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-16 20:49:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44426389, 44387070, 44397974, 44390906, 44369720, 44363338, 44378632, 44444558, 44417849, 44406784, 44334110, 44452814, 44434181, 44359830, 44348987, 44437957, 44412921 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed building footprint imports. Please adhere to import guidelines, and discuss BEFORE you import.
shrddr (2017-04-17 13:22:45+00:00): http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=53.9049475&lon=27.5692512&zoom=19&camera.theta=65.913&camera.phi=176.367
skyper (2016-12-18 17:03:25+00:00): Keine Gebäude verändert, sondern Parkplatz
skyper (2016-12-18 17:03:49+00:00): Keine Gebäude verändert, sondern Parkplatz.
EugenyN (2017-01-04 15:08:19+00:00): Здравствуйте! Зачем вы удалили два родника ? Тем более там были дополнительные уточняющие теги. (имена, пригодность воды для питья)
skyper (2016-12-18 17:04:17+00:00): Keine Gebäude verändert, sondern Bäume ergänzt
marczoutendijk (2016-12-04 14:30:56+00:00): GEEN SPATIE in de postcodes!! En ook n iet in de huisnummer-toevoeging.
Zie: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/BAGimport
mueschel (2016-12-04 21:16:12+00:00): Hi,
I found tags like "water tank:street" on 23 of your objects. There should be no spaces in keys, could you change them to the correct keys?
Jan
Aleks-Berlin (2016-12-04 21:27:58+00:00): I fixed some tags, but did not detect all mistakes. So its not my objects. But I try to fix within this week. KR, Alex
mueschel (2016-12-04 21:37:27+00:00): Sorry, I didn't look close enough. I commented the right changeset now.
Aleks-Berlin (2016-12-05 19:19:40+00:00): Anyway: I think/hope I fixed them all now :-)
Graf Westerholt (2016-12-20 18:56:26+00:00): Hi hashier,


when you tag diet:vegetarian=yes that this says that there is also dead animal available to eat, but with diet:vegan=only it says there is no dead animal and no milk and no egg. So if it is only vegan, you can tag diet:vegetarian=only (because every meal is vegetarien: vegetarian people can eat all meals there) or do not use the diet:vegetarian key.

For a website one should use contact:website=*

See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:url

And cuisine=vegan should not be used, see here:

    http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cuisine

It would be great if you would add payment=*, diaper=*, internet_access=*, opening_hours=* and wheelchair=*

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=restaurant
hashier (2016-12-21 11:04:02+00:00): Hi Graf,

thanks for the insight. I updated the vegetarian tag to only (because I sometimes query the DB to find all vegetarian places and I think it's nice to have one query to find all vegetarian and vegan places simply with one query instead of two).

Further I used "website" because on the wiki page you linked it even managed that it is more widely used then contact:website.

Further I removed the cuisine tag after reading about it.

Lastly, the other key tags I will update next time I'm in the area and can check the wheelchair accessibility and verify payment options.

Thanks again for the insightful help
Graf Westerholt (2016-12-21 14:25:41+00:00): I am glad I could help. wheelchair is also important for prams. I forgot to mention http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:check_date and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:organic Beside, do you know OsmAnd~? https://f-droid.org/repository/browse/?fdfilter=OsmAnd&fdid=net.osmand.plus Do you know http://veggiekarte.de/#15/52.2629/10.5361 ? http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/kNr
arcanma (2017-01-22 16:35:31+00:00): Per poter vedere gli oggetti sulla mappa non basta disegnare la linea, ma bisogna assegnargli anche valori appropriati, ad esempio la way 457464047 (distributore lungo la strada della Contessa) dovrebbe essere building=roof, senza aggiungere altro dato che il distributore è già inserito come nodo. I due percorsi 457464048 e 457464049 rappresentano il perimetro del ristorante presso lo stesso distributore, andrebbero riunite e aggiunto il tag building=yes
adrianojbr (2016-12-03 22:20:10+00:00): Victor, a ponte entre as ruas 129 E e 115 foi reconstruída?

eu apaguei a ponte há alguns meses (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/40845739).
adrianojbr (2016-12-06 00:49:50+00:00): victor, favor responda a mensagem, para que possamos chegar a um entendimento.