piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
EneaSuper (2017-12-30 15:26:44+00:00): Hi Jean-Marc, I'll answer you immediately about your observations:

I have not been able to find the names of those streets yet, and they probably do not have one. If you know where I can find some useful info let me know.

Actually the current squares can change them in leisure=common, I think it's a great idea!

Some roads are highway=residential simply because they seemed more important and wide enough to allow the passage of motor vehicles.
In the future, however, I will remove the service=driveway tag from the service roads, because at the end of the day it seems more appropriate and in line with the standards of the other neighboring countries and villages.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-12-30 15:39:06+00:00): Thanks for your quick answer. Indeed most streets in Senegal have no name - though those in large cities have a reference... But, of course, Dabia is no big city so you can safely posit the absence of name - which the lack of name=* models well enough. noname=yes requires proof of absence of name - a step beyond a probable lack of name... Or most of Senegal's ways would feature noname=yes !

The service vs. residential debate is a long story for Openstreetmap Senegal - many foreign mappers feel that the small backstreets are not residential worthy and therefore are service... But most of them are actually residential. Of course there are many grey areas there - so don't sweat it too much.
EneaSuper (2017-12-30 15:52:02+00:00): I decided to insert the noname=yes tag simply because JOSM counted it as an error if I did not do it. Besides, it seemed to me regardless of the most suitable thing to do.
As far as the debate is concerned, I understand that the OSM terminologies may not always be the same as those on the road laws of the various countries, so it is quite difficult to decide which are the most suitable tags to insert.
I will continue on my way step by step, thanks for the advice and tricks!
Jean-Marc Liotier (2017-12-30 15:55:52+00:00): You're welcome. About JOSM's error checking, the error raised on the absence of name would be perfectly relevant in a European town... But of course Eastern Senegal is a little different...
EneaSuper (2017-12-30 16:54:16+00:00): Yes, I guess :o
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:01+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
mueschel (2017-12-31 11:56:12+00:00): Hallo,
willkommen bei OSM!
Du trägst hier über einen recht großen Bereich Daten ein, woher stammen diese Informationen? Bitte denke immer daran, dass diese unter einer mit ODbL kompatiblen Lizenz stehen müssen, damit sie für OSM verwendet werden dürfen. 

Gruß, Jan
mueschel (2017-12-31 11:57:56+00:00): Und achte bitte auch immer darauf, ob diese Daten schon in OSM vorhanden sind. Hier sind die Informationen schon am Hauptgebäude angebracht.
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:04+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:06+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-12-30 15:28:38+00:00): Przypominam, że w miejscowościach, gdzie numery nie są powiązane z ulicami, stosujemy tagowanie addr:city i addr:place.
Stosowanie addr:city=Przełazy + addr:street=Przełazy jest błędne.
Pozdrawiam
Anazaar (2017-12-30 16:59:53+00:00): Przeoczenie. Dziękuję za uwagę. Postaram się to możliwie szybko naprawić.
Anazaar (2017-12-30 17:08:13+00:00): Błąd musiał występpwać jeszcze przed moją edycją i niestety go powieliłem.
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-12-30 17:09:04+00:00): W Przełazach już poprawiłem. :-)
Anazaar (2017-12-30 17:21:28+00:00): Mogłem niechcący jeszcze w pobliskich Niesulicach błąd powielić/przeoczyć 🤔 
Poprawiałem tam nazwę w tag city z Kalinowo na Niesuluce i nie wiem czy innych błędów nie było. Miałem tam wszystkie adresy po nowym roku zweryfikować. Na razie nie mam dostępu do kompa.
user_3216889 (2017-12-30 13:42:32+00:00): Oef, slordig van mij!
Dank voor de correctie.
viloan (2017-12-29 12:18:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2017-12-29 12:41:47+00:00): Op de rotonde (auto-/brommergedeelte) zelf moet nog de tag junction=roundabout
oneway=yes kan er dan af. 
Op het fietspadgedeelte zou ik geen roundabout taggen.
Het noordelijke voetpad zou ik gewoon aan laten sluiten op het fietspad.
parallelvoetpaden zou ik gewoon niet mappen langs de rotonde.
jaap de vries (2018-03-28 09:44:50+00:00): Ik heb de tandarts even op het bestaande adres gezet. Nu staat er 2 x Lange Neerstraat nr 1 op de kaart.
mrhugo (2017-12-29 12:51:58+00:00): Editing error. Changeset: 55008689  is more representative of the bike lane
dikkeknodel (2018-03-28 09:42:46+00:00): Hello Andreas, 
I see you changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362740738 from track to service. A service road is a road that gives access to some service on for example an industrial estate, which is not obvious here. Why do you consider this a service road? Additionally, you tagged a lot of highways with name=4x4. I cannot imagine that a lot of roads in this area actually have this as their streetname, but can imagine that they may only be accessible by a 4x4 car. If the latter is the case, you should consider using the 4wd_only tag, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:4wd_only.
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers, dikkeknodel
RafalR (2017-12-29 14:14:41+00:00): A gdzie stare nazwy?
zbronek (2017-12-29 14:16:14+00:00): Przy nazwach przystanków, też należy je dawać?
zbronek (2017-12-29 14:29:28+00:00): Już dodałem:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55011192
pitscheplatsch (2017-12-31 08:09:31+00:00): Hi Argabix, welcome to OSM. Could you please don't delete and redraw more or less the same objects? This deletes the history. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history
More information about your changeset: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=55008860
vng_me (2017-12-29 14:05:45+00:00): Зачем делать точки парковок, если они уже обозначены как area?
Constable (2017-12-29 15:43:33+00:00): ciao, se conosci qualche dettaglio in più sul parcheggio, aggiungilo pure. Mi riferisco in particolare al tag fee (pagamento)
Grazie, ciao!
mikiquo (2017-12-30 13:59:55+00:00): Appena avrò l'occasione controllerò
ciao!
Alexander-II (2017-12-29 19:09:40+00:00): Не утруждайте себя. Отменить ваши художества заняло у меня минут 5 времени. Напрасный труд.
eggie (2017-12-29 13:13:11+00:00): review request:
Oke.. nuttige aanvullingen. Wanneer een pad onder een gebouw doorloopt is de juiste tag   tunnel=building_passage

bicycle=no hoeft niet op een footway..
Captain_Spork (2017-12-29 13:15:39+00:00): Hallo Bryan,

Ziet er goed uit. Volgens mij moeten de tunneltjes echter getagd worden als tunnel=building_passage aangezien ze onder het gebouw doorlopen. Tevens mag de layer=-1 er ook af (is mij laatst ook verteld toen ik een tunnel onder een gebouw had gemapt).

Volgens mij is het ook zo dat brandgangen doorgaans met access=private worden getagd om onnodige routering te voorkomen.

Misschien kan eggie (hij leest vast weer mee) hier meer uitsluitsel over geven :).

Groeten,
Mark
eggie (2017-12-29 13:27:08+00:00): Nou ... twee identieke adviezen :)
Captain_Spork (2017-12-30 00:00:02+00:00): Haha ja mooi :).
5m4u9 (2017-12-29 20:41:58+00:00): dos recomendaciones:
//
en los nombres de los negocios solo poner el nombre y no el tipo de negocio, eso ya lo haces con la categoria
//
los nombres de las calles no poner abreviaturas como Av. o Psje. o C. (calle)...
viloan (2017-12-29 13:06:22+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
SomeoneElse (2018-01-15 13:11:55+00:00): Is adding spaces to opening hours (as in https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464539974/history ) really required?
parukhin (2018-01-15 13:33:52+00:00): No, not really. But it make opening hours more comfortable for human reading. It's result of JOSM validator opening_hours "prettifying" options. (Adding spaces after ";" deleting after "," capitalization first symbols (mo-fr) etc.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-12-30 13:30:36+00:00): Não cole vias com áreas como fez aqui https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549371795/history

Já desfiz
pyram (2017-12-30 15:29:47+00:00): Hello again, OSM Projeto.

This upload seems to be misaligned by 70 meters. See GPS-Track at "BR-158".

You are sure there is a "leisure" with name="Área de Preservação" ?? It seems to be simple a natural=wood.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549742945
is *never* a village_green.

Best regards
pyram
gd-wg (2018-05-01 15:59:19+00:00): Hello, does this exist? I looeked for, but did not see it?
Leonorf (2018-05-01 16:31:07+00:00): Hello... do you mean that you can't see the trail 124?
gd-wg (2018-05-01 18:20:39+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55010026
it is no track there. I looked from both sides.

greetings
gd-wg (2018-05-01 18:21:41+00:00): not even a path
Leonorf (2018-05-05 18:02:17+00:00): Actually, if you are talking about the real path, I don't know anything at all: I received the GPS track from CAI to digitalize it. Sorry
gd-wg (2018-05-06 06:34:36+00:00): ok, i added comment in name of this line fixme..... the right way does not exist (there is no street), the left way is existing and a marked way.

So we can close this discussion.Thanks for adding data.
imagico (2018-02-27 11:08:53+00:00): Hello visaman-import,

could you point me to where this import and its tagging have been discussed and are documented?

The data of this and other changesets from you in the same area uses undocumented and partly redundant tags, URLs that redirect to an empty page and the data in parts contradicts existing data in OSM.
eggie (2017-12-29 16:02:21+00:00): source=BAG mag gewoon op de adresnode blijven...
eggie (2017-12-29 16:06:03+00:00): Ik stuur je per PB de welkomstmail zoals we die nu naar nieuwe mappers sturen. Wellicht heb je wat aan de nuttige links.
Patryk Piotrowski (2017-12-30 11:13:28+00:00): Poprawiono;)
abakus_uploader (2017-12-30 16:35:24+00:00): Dziękuję
:)
Xaphar (2017-12-30 09:04:16+00:00): No the graffiti is placed by an artist, asked by the owner of the witte merel, i Shall add a photo on mappillary
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:08+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
naoliv (2018-01-05 13:16:10+00:00): This changeset was reverted in the following changesets: 55185169 55185329 55185484 55185590 55185755 55185888 55186012 55186123 55186251 55186361 55186481
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-01-01 21:14:35+00:00): Dlaczego ulicy Dunikowskiego dałeś nazwę Wyścigowa?
Zbigniew_Cz (2018-01-01 21:41:08+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=679299#p679299
zbronek (2018-01-01 22:05:34+00:00): Przepraszam, mój błąd. Prawdopodobnie przy kopiowaniu znaczników dotyczących prędkości zaznaczyłem i skopiowałem także nazwę z ul. Wyścigowej. Już poprawiłem.
Gh0stz0x (2017-12-29 15:35:50+00:00): Ciao ragazzo, sicuro che Sant'Imbù Cafè sia un amenity=bar e non un amenity=cafe? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:amenity%3Dbar
ciao e ben venuto su OpenStreetMap ;-)
trial (2017-12-30 14:05:49+00:00): Welcome to OSM, some remarks:

- some building are far away from the others. They sould be in separate changesets so that people looking for changes let's say close to Le Mans won't have a look at your change.

- please follow the local rules.
For instance https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/73564304 has addr:housenumber 	18, like other addresses it should be a separate node like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1087172010.
This has some logical reasons (if the building is destroyed the address remain) and makes the rendering coherent.
SomeoneElse (2019-06-11 22:38:21+00:00): Hello,
Hope you don't mind me commenting on a changeset from ages ago.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/453084030/history has got "source=Google Maps" on it, but we can't actually use that as a source in OSM (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F for details).
However, the building footprint exactly matches Bing here, the name was there before this edit and the address info came via FHRS so I'm not sure what if anything came from Google Maps here.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SpillerC (2019-06-12 09:23:52+00:00): How strange! I don't use Google Maps for OSM. I certainly don't remember adding that source tag. It's just not something I do.

That entire changeset (I think, without checking it completely) was updating the city= tags for addresses with locations in BD20 postcode area. Found using Robert's tool at https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/post-towns/
I think I will just remove that source. I can't imagine how it would be correct.
SomeoneElse (2019-06-12 09:25:42+00:00): Yes - sounds OK to me.
Thanks!
Supaplex (2018-01-21 10:28:16+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Christophe Mathieu (2018-01-13 09:24:49+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55011638
kartonage (2017-12-31 05:09:09+00:00): Hey there, around Navas at the junction of Carrer de Las Navas de Tolosa and Avinguda Meridiana a whole street section seems to be missing. Mistake, something you wanted to add later or construction? Just curious because some adminstrative boundaries broke at that section since they are no longer connected/closed (as are the streets).
Cheers
yopaseopor (2017-12-31 15:16:46+00:00): Thanks for your warning.Fixed
Gràcies pe teu avís.Arreglat
Gracias por tu aviso.Arreglado
5m4u9 (2017-12-29 20:47:57+00:00): gracias por contribuir al mapa!
//
cuando registres negocios debes poner el nombre propio y no el tipo de negocio, en lo posible no usar mayúsculas
//
algunos elementos como parques, plazas, areas deben ser mapeadas como areas y no solo puntos
trial (2017-12-31 23:01:11+00:00): Du hast 2 Grenzen geändert.
Wie es hier aussieht kommt mir komisch for:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2202162/#map=19/47.57582/7.57538

(wer es gemacht hat, weiß ich nicht, nun bist Du der letzte Anderer.
johsin18 (2018-01-01 08:45:32+00:00): Du meinst, dass die Grenze den Kreisverkehr schneidet?  Das ist wohl tatsächlich so:
http://www.stadtplan.bs.ch/geoviewer/index.php?cps=2610291.9,1269496.61,1000&nodefault&layers=parzplan_vektor_farb_1000
(legale Quelle)
Ich habe nur Segmente unterteilt, die Geometrie nicht geändert (jedenfalls nicht absichtlich).
trial (2018-01-01 09:46:07+00:00): Ja ganz genau. Danke.
Fandarel (2017-12-30 09:06:18+00:00): Moin,  würdest du die Änderung bitte selber wieder rückgängig machen? So ist es falsch.
kphklaus (2017-12-30 09:58:05+00:00): Ich verstehe nicht was Du meinst? Der Name steht so über der Tür und nicht Dörfler sehen auch nicht was das ist. 
Mach es besser wenn Du das meinst! Grüße kphklaus
trigpoint (2018-01-01 23:12:43+00:00): Hi, this looks like a recreation ground rather than a park and sport=basketball is kind of unlikely, it looks more like netball to me.
Cheers Phil
mueschel (2017-12-31 12:04:50+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tagging of this node?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5310422717
Looks like a mistake...
Cheers, Jan
viloan (2017-12-29 16:08:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Davide_sd (2017-12-29 16:37:54+00:00): Ciao Spezzi,
dove hai preso i dati georeferenziati del gasdotto? Dalle immagini satellitari e' impossibile dire che lì ci sia qualcosa...
user_5359 (2017-12-29 20:28:08+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead.
hsimpson (2018-01-31 00:28:54+00:00): Hi Holger,
danke, dass du dich um den ÖPNV in Pesch und Umgebung kümmerst! Die Gegend hat es echt dringend mal nötig!
-
Mir sind jedoch eben ein paar Sachen aufgefallen:
* Du hast die Stop_positions direkt neben die platform gesetzt. Die Stop Position soll jedoch anzeigen, wo genau der Bus zum stehen kommt und daher immer ein Teil der Fahrbahn sein.
* Du hast die alten Platform Nodes leider gar nicht beachtet, wordurch diese überhaupt nicht mit den neuen stop_positions korrespondiert haben.
* Du hast die Stop_positions ganz am Ende der Routenrelation hinzugefügt. Allerdings muss man sagen, dass du das hier gar nicht anders hättest machen können, weil iD (der Editor auf der Hauptseite von OSM) leider die Reihenfolge von Relationsmitgliedern nicht bearbeiten kann. Deswegen ist dieser Editor auch leider vollkommen ungeeignet für das ÖPNV-Mapping. Meine Empfehlung: Hol dir JOSM: https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ Neben dem deutlich größeren Funktionsumfang hat dieser Editor auch noch eine sehr gute Fehlererkennung, die einen warnt, bevor man etwas fehlerhaftes hochladen will.
-
Nebenbei habe ich gesehen, dass du die Neue Linie 123 in PTv1 geschrieben hast. Das ist ein veralteter Standard, der nach Möglichkeit nicht mehr verwendet werden sollte. Deutlich besser geeignet ist PTv2
-
Ich weiß, dass auf der VRS-Wiki-Seite derzeit noch keine gute Dokumentation über den zu verwendenden Mappingstil vorhanden ist und das Thema generell schwer zu durchblicken ist. Deswegen würde ich die die Wiki-Seite vom AVV empfehlen wollen. Dort habe ich vor einiger Zeit selbst einen Versuch getätigt, das Thema übersichtlich zu erfassen (allerdings mangels Relevanz nicht für die Stadtbahn, sowas gibt's ja in Aachen nicht): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Aachener_Verkehrsverbund#Linienmapping
-
Ich habe eben die Haltestelle Pescher Weg überarbeitet, die kannst du gerne als Vorlage für weitere Haltestellen verwenden.
-
Wenn du sonst noch Fragen hast, dann kannst du mich sehr gerne einfach fragen :) Alternativ dazu findest du im Forum auch immer einen geeigneten Ansprechpartner: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
-
Weiterhin viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Mappen!
-
Viele Grüße!
hsimpson (2018-01-31 00:35:40+00:00): Nebenbei: Mit dem neuen VRS-Qualitätstool (was im Moment noch in Probe ist) gibt es eine sehr gute Übersicht über die derzeit vorhandenen Fehler bei den ÖPNV-Linien im VRS: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/VRS/Analyse
santamariense (2018-01-07 09:07:16+00:00): Adicione também os marcadores de bairros. Para isso adicione um ponto, marca ele como vizinhança ou bairro e adiciona o nome dele. Com isso o bairro vai aparecer no mapa também.
user_3216889 (2017-12-31 20:40:40+00:00): Reverted this changeset by #55065796.
Since the new N361 road was finished, no connection of road exists at that spot. So the gap is a reality.
We are reworking the hike trails in that area at the moment.
Peilscheibe (2018-01-12 17:10:12+00:00): Hallo chrislybaer,

die getaggten Öffnungszeiten stimmen nicht mit den Angaben auf der Webseite überein, was ist denn jetzt richtig?

Grüße, P.
chrislybaer (2018-01-12 20:00:39+00:00): Hallo Pfeilscheibe,
habe mich in meiner Änderung auch auf die Webseite bezogen und beim übertragen einen Fehler gemacht.
Habe die Öffnungszeiten nun korrigiert.

Grüße, Chris
viloan (2017-12-29 16:35:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
trial (2019-06-14 19:27:53+00:00): For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549760495 I guess you mean leisure=sauna instead of name=sauna