piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2020-04-28 17:35:17+00:00): Hello Alexandra, You requested a review.
You mapped 1 building, but forget to square it.
and ... connected 2 nodes to the highway you mapped. Never do that. Navigation systems have no idea how to deal with buildings which are connected to a road, The road itself is overrated. This nothing more than a path ( You will learn that when you get more experienced) Actually there is a path going the other direction which connects the building with other dwellings. You mapped them on another changeset.
A hint. to measure if a trace is a road capable to be driven by cars (4track or more) the road must by wider than 2- 2,5 mtr. Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of that trace.  type 
	 ctr +shift+M shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes and you get the width.

Something to study if you didn't already

https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view

I will not react any more on other changeset in this area but correct them
Best regards and keep mapping
Frans S (2020-04-28 16:55:38+00:00): Hello Aadarsh, You asked for a review.
You just mapped 1 object as a building. I could not find any trace on this place (checked several imageries.) I do not know what makes you decide this is a building. Always check for a shadow. A building shows a shadow because it is above groundlevel. On the size of the shadow you can see the lenght (or the width) of that building. So If there is no shadow visible, 90 % change it isn't a building.
I will remove this mapping
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84151065
Frans S (2020-04-28 16:58:21+00:00): Hello Aardash.  This is the same situation as previous comment. I will remove these mappings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84151246
mariotomo (2023-01-24 15:50:38+00:00): una quebrada a la vez, y no te estoy comentando a todas las que no reconozco en las fotos aéreas, y bueno como siempre de dónde lees los nombres, quién sabe y quién puede validarlo … "Bing", dices.
Frans S (2020-04-28 17:06:14+00:00): Hello. As mentioned before, these are no buildings.
Also the square you mapped as park !!!
is not correct.I hope you were joking.
I remove these mappings
Have you read these documents?
#hotosm-project-7253 #TanzaniaDevelopmentTrust Kagera missing roads #mapwithai
and
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

Best regards and keep mapping
Arun Madhavan (2020-04-27 06:47:17+00:00): Are you sure abt this road here ? Not visible on Satellite image.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84151606
Meera Issac Mathew (2020-04-29 15:49:15+00:00): Yes...damn sure...this way leads to my home
Chris Fleming (2020-04-26 22:44:41+00:00): Weclome to OpenStreetMap, thanks for taking time to sign up and help improve the map. 

It's great to see a local mapper helping to improve the map.

Let me know if you have any questions?

Cheers
Chris
CantrayJDW (2020-04-27 05:34:13+00:00): Thanks for the comment.
I have a few questions:
1) I have found the guidance mostly helpful, particularly for adding new information, e.g. in my case paths and tracks I know personally, and have gps data for. But I am less clear about access tags. I am tagging paths with bike and horse = no, if it is clearly impracticable to take a bike and/or horse along a footpath, as such would not be "responsible access" within the Scottish Outdoor Access Code, and hence not actually legal within the 2003 law. Obviously this is just Scotland, but you can't legally wander about with a chainsaw just to take your bike on a footpath. Do you agree?
2) I feel happy about adding material, but where my new mapping joins onto existing mapping, then I am finding it is not correct, or has missing tags, or is just strange. Is it OK to change existing material where I have local knowledge and it looks 'wrong'?

Regards
!bm (2020-04-30 19:03:17+00:00): Hey Mlvln, das könnte/sollte dich interessieren: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik --besteGrüße!bm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84152226
Mlvln (2020-05-01 11:05:02+00:00): Hey !bm,
ja danke für den Hinweis. Das nächste mal zeichne ich die Fläche von dem Punkt aus. LG Mlvln
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84152226
elgolfo (2020-04-28 20:30:38+00:00): Hi NeverSummer,

kannst du hier noch Angaben zu tracktype, surface und smoothness machen?

Viele Grüße
Moritz
alesarrett (2020-05-01 06:00:23+00:00): Grazie per la correzione!
MarcoR (2020-05-01 07:11:19+00:00): Figurati! Stavo controllando su Taginfo se usare ref:msal o ref:MSAL e ho visto un unico valore ripetuto due volte in Italia...
Buon mapping!
BCNorwich (2020-04-27 07:18:17+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I joined Way: 589608375 to the road at north end.
Way: 503848543, there is no footpath here, there are two footpaths, one each side for pedestrian use only.
You dragged Biopark Drive and Broadwater Road out of alignment joining the to a side road, I've corrected this.
You inadvertently unjoined Way: 119739432 from Peartree Lane, I've re-joined it.
You joined the wood Way: 40633766 to the B195, I've amended it.
Re bridleway Way: 37806016 cycling on a public bridleway is not designated, it is usually allowed though so tag should be bicycle=yes if that is the case. There could be situations where cycling is not allowed on a public bridleway.

Regards Bernard,
mapman44 (2020-04-26 18:24:07+00:00): Did you follow these guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Jared Best (2020-04-26 19:00:01+00:00): Thanks for the link. Do these guidelines apply in the case where JOSM is used to draw the building footprints instead of the in-browser editor? I used JOSM as the BuildingsTools plugin provided a faster method of drawing areas in comparison to the in-browser editor.
Adam Franco (2020-05-07 20:11:21+00:00): Hi @JaredBest, if you drew the buildings based on looking at the satellite imagery, then no, the Import Guidelines don't exist. If however you were to load the building footprints into JOSM from an external data source (Microsoft building footprints, State of NY building footprints, etc), then they would apply.
Adam Franco (2020-05-07 20:11:55+00:00): ("don't exist" should be "don't apply")
mapman44 (2020-04-26 18:24:44+00:00): Did you follow these guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Jared Best (2020-04-26 19:00:06+00:00): Thanks for the link. Do these guidelines apply in the case where JOSM is used to draw the building footprints instead of the in-browser editor? I used JOSM as the BuildingsTools plugin provided a faster method of drawing areas in comparison to the in-browser editor.
mapman44 (2020-04-26 19:45:34+00:00): The tool used is not the point but rather the integrity of the OSM data. Were the buildings created by you, or was the data copied from another source (NYS Orthos Online) and brought into OSM electronically? Are there any copyright restrictions on the data? Was the accuracy of the data verified? If so, how? These and many other questions are detailed in the import guidelines.
Jared Best (2020-04-27 18:29:40+00:00): I understand your point with the integrity of the OSM data. Again, the buildings were drawn in JOSM based on aerial imagery (NYS Orthos Online was the main basemap used) as well as street-level photography, when needed. In terms of verifying the accuracy of the data, I have been going through (literally) every single building within the town boundary and checking and if necessary the footprints using the basemap/street-level data.
juhahokka (2020-05-08 09:01:17+00:00): kerkesit lisäämään tuon ennen mua. Hyvä =)
Frans S (2020-04-29 12:17:39+00:00): Hello Mushfique,
Thanks for your contribution to this project.
These are your very first mappings. 
I give comment and advise to improve your mappings.

Most buildings are not that accurate! Sometimes buildings can look off-square because of the angle of the imagery or if trees are covering a part of the roof, but do draw them rectangular, the way they would be in reality . Square each building by pressing the Q key while the object is still selected.
Make sure to deal with AI-generated data (pink stripey buildings) as well, i.e. either use (and if necessary tweak it) or remove it - check instructions tab on the project page for details. 
You connected buildings to other features like highways . These are errors. Never let a node of a building or road/path connect to other objects. 

About highways. The aim is just to map roads which matters. 
Roads connecting throug roads with hamlest, dwellings etc. Not roads/paths leading to farmland or wood
Roads needs to be connected to other roads if possible.
Common used tags for highways in rural area are 'unclassified' and 'path' .The tag ' residential' is to be used in more dense urban areas
Check if they can carry 4 wheel cars.  When it is just a narrow trace leading to buildings they are mostly paths.
you can measure the witdht of a road:
ctr +shift+M shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes and you get the width.

Did you go through the documents  guidance for road tagging and 
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
https://crowd2map.slack.com/files/U4HH3QGJZ/F010ZH13T6H/get_started_crowd2map_rev_4f.pdf 


Thanks for all your work, and please keep mapping :)
PLima785 (2020-04-28 10:12:03+00:00): Bom dia, obrigado pelas tuas edições.
Vou só te pedir que uses as imagens de satélite da maxar que são mais recentes do que as da Bing.
Qualquer dúvida tens aqui este canal no telegram https://t.me/OSMPortugal
Cumprimentos,
Pedro Lima
mc124 (2020-04-28 11:01:38+00:00): Bom dia, não conhecia essa opção para alterar o fornecedor das imagens de satélite, muito obrigado pela dica! Vou alterar a estrada e o Fitness Hut para corresponder à imagem de satélite.
UrSuS (2020-05-08 19:19:41+00:00): nevajag taisit relations ja nemaki!
Nagerevnu (2020-05-11 06:42:26+00:00): Sveiki - kurš var pamācīt? Un paskaidrot? šo konkrēto netaisīju - centos saprast, kā uztaisīt, lai izskatītos labāk. Būšu priecīgs, ja kāds varēs pamācīt. Paldies jau iepriekš.
UrSuS (2020-05-19 10:09:19+00:00): Varu palidzet ar regigesanu JOSMa
Nagerevnu (2020-05-19 13:56:41+00:00): Nu šeit būtu labi ja varētu salikt, bet ir lielāka problēma: https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=15/57.3274/25.0780 pieliekot purvu mežs pazuda - kaut abi tikai saskaras
BCNorwich (2020-04-27 07:37:01+00:00): Hi, Regarding Way: Footpath under low bridge (395843776), is that really the formal name or part of the path description?
The bridge "maxweight=20 tonnes except coaches" tag is incorrect, should be maxweight=20  There's a special maxweght tag for conditions :-https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions

Regards Bernard
Howard Peartree (2020-05-03 17:30:20+00:00): Thanks Bernard. It's my first time out on OSM so I appreciate your advice and tidying up after me. Regards, Howard
Howard Peartree (2020-05-03 17:32:45+00:00): Thanks Bernard. It's my first time out on OSM, so I appreciate your guidance. Howard
BCNorwich (2020-04-27 08:00:13+00:00): I think "Police firing range" is not the name but a description. Also it's not a military area.
Possible the best tags are landuse=firing_range, police=training_area These accurately describe the feature.
Regards Bernard.
Frans S (2020-05-02 09:43:39+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A remark. Buildings can be recognized by the shadow they give. Please do not include the shadow in the mapping.
And. Please square each building you map with the Q key in iD editor.
From the 182 buildings you mapped here are 117 not squared.
Be sure not to connect nodes of buildings to another building or other features.
Best regards and keep mapping
nbotsford3 (2020-04-26 18:37:12+00:00): Done by mistake, will fix
WoSoe (2020-06-29 04:53:10+00:00): Hallo Lokverführer,
ich kann deine Änderung der Wegführung an der A9/Schwarzach nicht nachvollziehen.
 
Der Weg bzw. die Wanderwege führen südlich der Schwarzach unter der A9 hindurch, ohne die Schwarzach zwei mal fuhrten (!) zu müssen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/796564490

Anmerkung:
Nördlich existiert zwar auch »noch« ein Pfad, der aber nur sehr selten begangen wird.
Lokverführer (2020-07-01 10:12:29+00:00): Hallo WoSoe, 
da muss dann wohl etwas schiefglaufen sein. Vielen Dank für deine Korrektur!
Frans S (2020-05-19 14:03:15+00:00): Hello Deanna, Thanks for mapping here
A small issue. When you map buildings, never connect nodes to another features like paths or highways, Please check the guideline what to map, you map paths which are not necessary. 
Please square your mapped buildings with the Q key in the editor. You missed some.

Best regards and keep mapping
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 16:52:17+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?
ToniE (2020-05-05 10:17:16+00:00): Hallo Martin,

die neue Straße wird dann anschließend sicherlich vom X910 benutzt, statt über den Flughafen zu fahren.
Weißt du schon, wann die Straße freigegeben werden kann?

https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/BY/DE-BY-MVV-Analysis.html#bus_X910

Viele Grüße
Toni
ToniE (2020-05-05 10:19:53+00:00): ... müsste evtl. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299979432 an die neue Lage des Zaunes angepasst werden?
Frans S (2020-04-28 15:02:21+00:00): Hello. You asked for a review. I commented on another changeset about squaring buildings.
Here you mapped/adjusted 178 buildings and none was properly squared. Please keep this in mind and square all your rectangular buildings
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84154700
tanish1980 (2020-04-28 16:18:17+00:00): Well Appreciated ! Keep Going...
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84154743
enterprise1995 (2020-06-06 18:09:28+00:00): Auf der Georg-Eckert-Str. gibt es in Fahrtrichtung Westen keine Benutzungspflicht des Gehwegs für Fahrräder. use_sidepath ist falsch.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-05-21 21:33:21+00:00): Eduardo, vi que voce moveu alguns nós, não sei baseado em qual imagem, mas na verdade eles ficaram fora do lugar. exemplo os nós dessa região: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5246082187/history
eduardosreis (2020-05-22 00:02:24+00:00): Olá Erick. O OSM me enviou e-mail com sua mensagem. Pelo que eu entendi você está se referindo às alterações que fiz na estrada que sobe para a Pedra do Itaúna, em Caratinga. Bom, o que mudei lá foi com base na imagem do BING, pelo editor iD. Além disso, passei lá recentemente de bike.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-05-22 13:01:55+00:00): Pois é, mas ficou incorreto o novo alinhamento que voce fez.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-05-22 13:02:29+00:00): EU mandei o link do ponto exato onde desalinhou nas duas mensagens que enviei
eduardosreis (2020-05-22 15:37:28+00:00): https://ibb.co/44Bb38L
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-05-22 15:50:38+00:00): eu vou alinhar com a camada Maxar que está mais recente
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-05-22 15:57:01+00:00): feito, peço que tome mais cuidado em realinhar vias com o bing.
user_5359 (2020-04-26 19:45:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
AntiCompositeNumber (2022-09-05 23:47:03+00:00): Are you sure way 796557692 is in the right place? It seems like it's inside the fence, and I don't really see a path there.
francians (2020-04-27 19:04:38+00:00): Ciao,

La direttiva Istat non prevederebbe: "Vicolo dei Giardini"?
Francesco
eggie (2020-04-26 20:13:04+00:00): De import vanuit de BAG stond nog op construction.
Je kunt dus ook de regel  construction=house verwijderen. Dat is de specificatie van construction=house. 
Gr Eggie
AdVerburg (2020-04-27 07:54:40+00:00): Een naam kun je toevoegen OF aan het adres-knooppunt (node) wanneer er ook een funtie bij staat, bv. tourism=chalet OF
als alternatief is om de naam op het gebouw te zetten, en ook daar tourism=chalet.
Maar niet beide. (Dus bij een van de twee weghalen)

De naam: Dat is de tekst zoals het *heet*, (zichtbaar met een bord | gevelsteen | naamplaat enz.) niet wat *is* (functie).
Dus geen "Huisje Klimop" o.i.d. maar "Klimop". Dat het een chalet is, is al aangegeven met tourism=chalet.

Over het draaien van gebouwen: In Nederland hebben we Basis Administratie Gebouwen (BAG, een overheids database) waarvan de gegevens door enkele OSM-ers periodiek geïmporteerd worden in OSM.
Na verloop van tijd komen de gegevens uit BAG overeen met OSM. (of anders gezegd, wat je nu aan het gebouw verandert wordt waarschijnlijk toch weer overruled)
Wanneer BAG niet klopt moet iemand aan de bel trekken, "een terugmelding" doen. Zie: https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?geometry.x=153555.5134375&geometry.y=510765.71598864&zoomlevel=7&objectId=0995100000834069&detailsObjectId=0995010000834070
Op die pagina vind je aan linker bovenkant de "Terugmelding"-knop. Daar kun je je opmerking(en) doen.

Over de straatnaam: Die naam komt uit BGT met een vergelijkbaar verhaal als BAG. Ik ga zometeen wel eens zoeken.
Voorlopig zou je het track van de loswal naar Huisje Watermunt loopt de name=Aanloop kunnen geven. (Dat zal niet ver bezijden de waarheid zijn.)

Groet Ad
SimoneJ (2020-04-27 10:26:42+00:00): aangepast!
user_5359 (2020-04-27 05:47:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
Cascafico (2020-06-12 10:01:34+00:00): Ha spostato parecchi elementi in base ad immagini non allineate. La prossima volta fai riferimento alle tracce GPS, oppure agli edifici che hanno il tag it:fvg:ctrn:code ed autore simone.
Devo ripristinare.
RedRibbon89 (2020-06-12 15:14:04+00:00): Fino a prova contraria, usufruendo dell'immagine satellitare sottostante ho sistemato edifici che per forma da te ripristinata non corrispondono alla realtà. Ad esempio il campo da calcio da te ripristinato ha dimensioni più piccole di quelle reali sia in larghezza sia in lunghezza. Per eseguire le modifiche ho usato la foto satellitari che appaiono quando si eseguono le modifiche. Inoltre abito qui e conosco la forma degli edifici che vedo ogni giorno da 40 anni.
Cascafico (2020-06-14 20:40:43+00:00): As I told you, you used (and continue to use) unaligned imagery. The whole area is becoming a mess.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84156805
Cascafico (2020-07-02 09:29:47+00:00): Hai pure rimosso la "Casa dell'Acqua", mettendo un nuovo nodo con solo "vending_machino". RImuovendo l'originale hai tolto informazioni utili e la possibilità di ripristinarlo facilmente.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84156805
Cascafico (2020-07-02 09:36:01+00:00): Perchè hai cancellato il node distributore di acqua, inserendo una generica vending machine?  In questo modo rendi il ripristino complicato.

I don't know why you removed node:
amenity=vending_machine	
fee=yes	
name=Casa dell'Acqua	
operator=Acquedotto Poiana	
vending=water
then, you added just a generic vending machine. If you want (for some strange reason) to cut details, just remove tags, in order to make restore of original POI easy.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84156805
KarmaCleaner (2020-07-06 11:56:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 87598797 where the changeset comment is: revert arbitrary edits
muralito (2020-04-26 23:56:21+00:00): Hola. Gracias por las colaboraciones.

Cada elemento de la realidad se mapea con un unico elemento en OSM que lo representa, por ejemplo o lo mapeas como poligono o como nodo, pero no de ambas formas a la vez.
Maxi Meilan (2020-05-05 20:03:17+00:00): Hola, muchas gracias por el comentario.
¿Es preferible utilizar polígonos o nodos?
gileri (2020-04-26 20:13:02+00:00): J'ai oublié d'envoyer mes précédentes modifications. Ce changeset enlève également les tags addr:* redondants de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2932335068
infeeeee (2020-04-26 20:15:13+00:00): Szia!
Ezeket a több szakaszra osztásokat miért csináltad? Ha jól látom mindkét felen ugyanazok a címkék vannak.
tubigabi (2020-04-26 22:30:01+00:00): Hello!
Az utcából csak bizonyos szakaszok kellenek.
eggie (2020-04-27 06:09:05+00:00): Kijk nog even naar dat commentaar van Ad.
je gebruikt man_made=embankment (rendert)  en man_made=dyke (nodig?) als lijnelement naast elkaar. Ik denk dat het dubbelop is.
Op sommige kaarten zal het denk ik dubbel renderen als dijk.
Volgens mij is man_made embankment voldoende. Up to you.   
Gr eggie
SimoneJ (2020-04-27 10:38:54+00:00): Hi Eggie en Ad, ik heb het ocmmentaar van Ad gelezen en kan het niet terugvinden. De man_made=dyke stond er al. Volgens mij mag dit weg maar ik vraag het even aan NM (natuurmonumenten)
Frans S (2020-05-02 08:27:56+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
A few remarks.
Buildings are to be recognized by the shadow they give. Prove that it is above groundlevel. mostly a building. Do not include the shadow in your mapping as you did here
Best regards and keep mapping
Tantibus Vulgaris (2021-09-23 14:59:37+00:00): Kažkodėl man regis, kad kelias 641995503 nesijungia su 398986463 (kiek esu ten buvęs). Užsižymiu, kad reikės patikrinti.
Litawor (2021-09-23 16:33:26+00:00): Gali būti. Prieš 1.5 metų žygiavau siauruko trasa 641995505. Iki tos sankryžos nuėjęs nebuvau.
eggie (2020-04-27 05:56:39+00:00): Simone.. In principe tag je altijd bij op de adresnode. Dat wordt dan een symbool op de kaart. De naam van een gebouw mag wel op de 'outline' van het gebouw. 
Een bedrijf altijd op de node. 
Soms is het schipperen.
Dubbel vermelden is ongewenst inderdaad.
Niet elke tag op een node wordt een symbool. Dat is aan de kaartenmaker.
De standaardkaart laat niet alles zien. Er zijn vele kaarten. 
(Hier kun je nog construction= yes verwijderen) Dat is de specificatie van de bouwperiode. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-04-27 06:13:39+00:00): Aanvulling.. Op een vlak levert meestal ook een symbool op.
SimoneJ (2020-04-27 10:22:08+00:00): Dank Eggie! Ik zie dat Harbor master is toegevoegd. fijn. heb me rotgezocht maar kon het niet vinden (kwam ook niet naar boven met typen)
VA00 (2020-05-21 05:42:56+00:00): Czy chodzi o kamień obok żółtej  tabliczki z nazwą szczytu Żar ?
adam999 (2020-05-23 20:35:28+00:00): to powinna być skała, wysokości ok. 5-10m, a po wschodniej stronie "grani", grupa mniejszych bloków skalnych. Dokładną lokalizację muszę zweryfikować na miejscu.
VA00 (2020-05-24 16:02:25+00:00): Na lidarze widać wał: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/806897974 Czy to właśnie te skały? Czy jeszcze kolejne?
eggie (2020-04-27 05:43:26+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
Tip: Schuiven met de kaart in editmodus veroorzaakt vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen. Houd het gebied van je edits klein en geef aan wat je doet.
Wat bedoel je motor_vehicle =Biker Outfit
Misschien shop=... ?
MVG,
Eggie
fryr (2020-04-27 06:41:30+00:00): Dank voor het welkom heten en het welkomstbericht. Het is inderdaad een winkel. Een winkel met motorkleding.
Frans S (2020-06-01 14:21:11+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here
Please review this document and follow the guidelines at next mappings .
Thanks and keep mapping
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxLkCU3IRecsFV2kYx61VImJLLtQiKw3/view
https://crowd2map.slack.com/files/U4AK0AARJ/F013HACFQ3X/crowd2map_get_started_rev_5c.pdf
aachso (2020-04-26 20:58:36+00:00): Landgericht, nicht Landgerecht :D