piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
rubasov (2023-03-04 06:18:11+00:00): Szervusz!

1. Valahogy nem jutottam meg el odaig, hogy mindent tokeletesen felterkepeztem volna, ami mellett eddig elmentem. ;-)

De amikor vizet kerestem odakint, sokat gondolkodtam rajta, en hogyan tudnam feljavitani, ami a terkepen van. Kulonosen, hogy a hegyekben a vizfolyasok tulnyomo tobbsege idoszakos. Ezt probaltam megosztani a changeseten hagyott megjegyzessel. Annyi ertelme van, amennyit te talalsz benne.

2. Egy forras lenyegeben 3 dolog kombinacioja: foldtani adottsagok, csapadek es esetlegesen egy emberi epitmeny, ami vizvetelhez foljavitja a termeszetes adottsagokat. Ennel a konkret forrasnal a foldtani adottsagok embereletnel hosszabb tavon stabilak. A forras foglalasa hibatlan allapotban van. Az egy valtozo tenyezo az elmult idoszak csapadekmennyisege. Ha az elmult hetekben kelloen sok csapadek esett, beindul. Ha nem, kiszarad. Tenyleg szeretned a disused tag-et foltenni es levenni ujra es ujra az aktualis csapadek szerint? Azzal a mellekhatassal, hogy disused allapotban eltunik a forras a terkeprol? Mert lenyegeben minden renderer el fogja rejteni a disused POI-kat.

Ha egy ilyen forras egy evben (csak peldakepp) atlag otszor beindul, de csak ketevente egy bejelentesunk van arrol, hogy eppen mukodik-e vagy sem, jo otlet ez alapjan mukodonek vagy nem mukodonek jelolni? Iyen mintavetelezes mellett az ido nagy reszeben rosszul lesz jelolve a forras.

Ne erts felre, en hasznosnak talalom a note-ben a datumozott allapotbejelenteseket.

Azzal is egyetertek, hogy van eset, amikor a disused a legjobb megoldas. Peldaul a megszuntetes szandekaval elzart kek kutat en is lifecycle taggel jelolom. De mondjuk egy telire elzart nem fagybiztos csapot nem lifecycle taggel jelolok, hanem seasonal=yes-t teszek ra. (Es beleirom a descriptionbe is, hogy "nem fagybiztos" vagy "telire elzarjak".) Kint a hegyekben pedig ez sokszor nem is az evszakon mulik, hanem az elmult par het csapadekmennyisegen, ezert jelolom seasonal helyett intermittent-nek. Az is elofordulhat, hogy egy korabban idoszakos forras a foldtani adottsagok vagy a klima megvaltozasa miatt orokre kiszarad. Szerintem ekkor is a lifecycle tag a helyes jeloles.

udv.
Bence
rubasov (2023-03-04 06:30:40+00:00): Meg egy szo a renderelesrol: ebben az esetben a kozkutak app a kivetel, hogy a disused POI-kat is megmutatja. De a tobbi renderer altalaban nem teszi ezt, hiszen a disused tag-nek az a jelentese, hogy valami megszunoben van, vagy mar nincs is.
user_399857 (2023-03-04 19:48:04+00:00): "jo otlet ez alapjan mukodonek vagy nem mukodonek jelolni?"

Nem, de ha ennyire képben vagy, akkor az elmúlt 8 évben miért nem került rá sosem intermittent jelzés?

A gondolatmeneted alapjén miért nem tettél minden forrásra intermittent? Aztán ha évekig nem megy, akkor lehet azt mondaani, hogy mindenki rossz ütemben járt arrafelé.

Egyébként nem a módosítással van bajom, lődd át, és kész, de nem látom az értelmet abban, hogy ezért megjegyzést fűzöl ide, amire aztán reagálni kell, amire aztán reagálni kell...

Az egész elméleted ott bukik, hogy ennyi erővel senki se módosíthatna semmit, csak ahol rendszeresen jár, mert ugye mi van, ha egy utca egyirányú lesz, te meg előtte felvitted kétirányúnak, 10 éve, aztán elköltöztél, és megváltozik a forgalmi rend. Akkor most baszarintsalak le évekkel később, hogy nem jó, vagy írjam át, és kész?

Kút, utak, sebesség limitek, padok, szemetesek, kutyagumi gyűjtők, állatorvosok, hotelek, boltok, ésatöbbi. Minden változik folyamatosan. Mindenhol elmagyarázod changeset-ben, hogy nem volt jó a korábbi beállítás, vagy átlövöd, amiről tudsz, hogy nem stimmel, és mindenki happy?
rubasov (2023-03-05 12:03:43+00:00): Eszemben sem volt "lebaszarintani". Jo szandekkal, a kesobbi jobb editek remenyeben irtam, amit irtam. Nincs itt tobb mondanivalom, nem szeretnem ezt a beszelgetest tovabb folytatni.
user_399857 (2023-03-05 12:24:51+00:00): Ok, köszi.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Ydel (2023-03-13 23:20:31+00:00): Bonsoir,
Pouvez vous m'éclairer sur ce que représente https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1851420194 svp?
Merci
Yann
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
abakus_uploader (2022-10-06 22:31:26+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
user_2066394 (2022-10-06 12:07:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101430293
Der im Luftbild sichtbare westliche Gebäudeteil wurde abgerissen?
Teraionai (2022-10-10 17:38:22+00:00): Negativ, er ist noch vorhanden aber ein eigenes Gebäude. Ich werde es noch hinzufügen.
AndersAndersson (2022-10-06 20:48:38+00:00): Hej!
Har de två stumparna av den gamla pipelinen tagits bort? De fanns på plats när jag var där förut.
Msiipola (2022-10-07 06:52:38+00:00): Jag antar de finns kvar. Men vad jag kan se är dessa inte längre i funktion.
Om de ska vara kvar borde i så fall märkas med "abandoned", men valde att ta bort dem helt.
Vad anser du?
AndersAndersson (2022-10-07 21:40:58+00:00): Finns dom där ska dom självklart inte tas bort. Ungefär som att ta bort älven när man slutat flotta timmer på den.
Du får lägga tillbaka dom. Fixa till taggarna om du anser att det jag ändrade förut inte var tillräckligt.
DaveF (2023-03-24 17:27:57+00:00): Hi
Should all these nodes with similar tags be on the tee's way?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10079522296
ivanbranco (2022-10-07 16:02:03+00:00): Ciao akomi-it, benvenut* su OSM

Ho visto che hai corretto l'indirizzo, se sei sicuro quello sia il nome della via andrebbe corretto anche il nome della strada però, sennò i router potrebbero avere dei problemi ad associare strada e indirizzo.  Buon mapping :)
akomi-it (2022-10-11 10:00:54+00:00): Ciao, Ivan.
No il nome della strada è giusto... so che è strano, ma la principale si chiama via CantaranA (che è anche il nome della località), mentre la secondaria si chiama via CantaranE.
E diventa via Corneto solo dall'incrocio (verso nord-est)
ivanbranco (2022-10-11 10:09:41+00:00): Ciao! Capisco, grazie per la risposta.

Rimane solo un problema, forse tu che sei local sai come risolverlo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/373100774/history

Questo spezzone si chiama "Via Corneto", mentre i due spezzoni che si collegano alla rotonda "Via Cantarane". Mi sembra sbagliato perché così c'è un "buco" in Via Cantarane tra i collegamenti della rotonda e il proseguimento all'angolo con Via Corneto.
akomi-it (2022-10-11 10:29:34+00:00): Hai ragione, ho aggiornato anche i due tratti che si collegano alla rotonda.
Però non riesco a capire se le modifiche sono state recepite... le vedo solo quando sono in modalità "modifica", ma non quando navigo la mappa
ivanbranco (2022-10-11 10:49:56+00:00): Se le vedi in modalità "modifica" vuol dire che sono state recepite, non preoccuparti. Il sito ci mette un po' ad aggiornarsi, puoi velocizzare il processo cancellando la cache del browser. Buon mapping e grazie per le modifiche :)
akomi-it (2022-10-11 13:24:36+00:00): Buono a sapersi, grazie!
UT93 (2024-10-19 09:36:25+00:00): Du hast sowohl in diesem Änderungssatz, als auch im https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126040425 eine Festung Castels erstellt. Es gibt sie also jetzt zwei Mal an fast der selben Stelle.
Frans S (2022-10-06 10:07:54+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
Most buildings are accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines.  You ignored extensions of buildings, like an entrance. 
I reviewed most of your changesets here.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127092679
Supaplex (2022-10-06 10:55:02+00:00): 請問已經完工啟用了嗎?
如果沒有請別自行改為公園
https://news.pts.org.tw/article/598512

另外依據 life cycle 標籤，請別移除舊的標籤
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127092818
Frans S (2022-10-06 10:30:32+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127092908
DavidKarlas (2022-10-06 11:16:34+00:00): Can you check what you wanted to do with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101438894? It probably shouldn't be natural=coastline
user_695848 (2022-10-06 20:01:16+00:00): Hi I want to add final water line for GERD Lake. What kind of feature I have to use. By final water line I mean when GERD will be finish and will be full of water. But this can take 1 or 2 years more.
Palolo (2022-10-08 22:36:58+00:00): I would suggest:
natural=water
water=reservoir
construction=yes

Thanks for working on GERD
Frans S (2022-10-06 10:28:14+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
Most of your mappings are accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
However ,please pay attention to next points:
* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* The shadow of a building included in your mapping.
* Incorporated the yard or a clearing into your mapping.




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127093100
Frans S (2022-10-06 10:21:43+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127093115
Frans S (2022-10-06 10:20:44+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127093121
Frans S (2022-10-06 10:59:06+00:00): Hello. I am a sr validator and review changesets at random.
Just an advise here. You added a road. Many, many nodes added. To reduce this quantity just run the simplify area button ( ctrl+shift+Y) 
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127093233
Frans S (2022-10-06 10:46:50+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127093368
yasslay (2022-10-06 10:03:43+00:00): I apologise if a relation here was modified, it was an accident.
pitscheplatsch (2022-10-07 05:39:58+00:00): Hallo,

ich bin kein Datenschutzexperte, aber die gelöschten Gebäude sind alle von öffentlichen Luftbildern aus ersichtlich. Daher würde ich vermuten, dass hier kein data privacy issue vorliegt und die reinen Geometrien der Gebäude erhalten bleiben sollten. 

Wie sieht die Local-Community dies oder gibt es aufgrund der aktuellen Situation vergleichbare Fälle?

Danke.

Full changeset information: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=127093604

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ChristinaLehnert (2022-10-07 05:51:21+00:00): Hallo, 

vielen Dank für die Antwort und die schnelle Rückmeldung. Es geht weniger um die Geometrien an sich, sondern um die Bezeichnungen der Gebäude. Obwohl ich sie bereits mehrfach entfernt habe, erscheinen sie trotzdem immer wieder. Das ist das eigentliche Risiko. Dass ich die Gebäude gelöscht habe war ein weiterer Versuch in der Hoffnung, dass auch die Bezeichnungen dann endgültig gelöscht sind.
Lokai (2022-10-09 09:48:49+00:00): Hallo, der CS wurde von mir wieder hergestellt. Die noch sichtbaren Hausnummern habe ich entfernt. Die Hallenbezeichnungen waren bereits gelöscht worden. Bis die Änderung der Daten auch in der Karte sichtbar wird kann einige Zeit vergehen. Leeren sie ihren Browsercache, dort können alte Daten gespeichert sein.

Gruß
ChristinaLehnert (2022-10-10 06:53:56+00:00): Alles klar vielen lieben Dank! 

Liebe Grüße
Frans S (2022-10-06 10:16:23+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127093695
impiaaa (2022-10-06 18:07:54+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. Please save your changes in one area before moving on to another, to keep the changeset size small. Also, you've changed an apartment complex in Roseville into a Chinese restaurant.
impiaaa (2022-10-06 18:10:52+00:00): I've reverted the changes to the apartments in changeset 127113711.
Divnoor singh (2022-10-07 05:20:13+00:00): @impiaaa much thanks!!
ivanbranco (2022-10-07 16:04:54+00:00): Ciao, benvenut* su OSM.

Avete cancellato il tag highway=residential da questa way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/47641205

era intenzionale?
kapazao (2022-10-06 11:31:50+00:00): Hi, why did you add residential areas inside a residential area?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127094090
draxus (2022-10-06 12:50:33+00:00): You're right, sorry. I didn't notice that the whole town is actually marked a residential area. I will remove them.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127094090
draxus (2022-10-06 13:02:45+00:00): Reverted in #127101878, thanks for your feedback!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127094090
kapazao (2022-10-10 08:42:59+00:00): Thank you
maraf24 (2022-10-25 08:49:34+00:00): Co do: "zaznaczyłem cały ten teren jako komisariat, ale pewność mam tylko co do dwóch szop, budynku biurowego i pomostów. Praktycznie nie do zweryfikowania, bo na wyspę w praktyce można się dostać tylko na zaproszenie PWR/Policji/Wód Polskich"

Skoro jest to nie do zweryfikowania, to jaka była podstawa do takiej edycji?
Hufkratzer (2022-10-06 17:44:20+00:00): Hi, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101451033 looks like a riding arena (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena) in the aerial view, but you have tagged it with leisure=horse_riding, which is for complete riding centres (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_riding). You have already tagged riding arenas correctly earlier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1021771642
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/902462088

And https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1101451032 isn't a riding centre either but may be a covered horse walker, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:animal=horse_walker
Jean-Louis Stanus (2022-10-06 20:24:37+00:00): hi, you are right
abakus_uploader (2022-10-06 22:31:27+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Denis_Helfer (2023-02-24 18:10:56+00:00): Salut,
Merci pour la transformation de la TVP en  souterrain. Juste le horse=no est un poil exagéré. Une note sur le souterrain (partie centrale): "souterrain absent de l'opendata SNCF" me permet de maj mes requêtes de suivi. Sinon, je m'en occupe....
Brummelwuff (2022-10-09 14:05:20+00:00): Hallo, das Geisterrad an der Wolbeckerstr. gibt es nicht mehr.
matthias-MS (2022-10-22 17:05:42+00:00): das ist richtig. Die Stelle wurde auch Umgebaut 

bin hin und hergerissen ob man der Toten gedenken darf, auch wenn da kein Rad stand oder steht. Hier war der Unfall vor knapp 8 Jahren

Grundsätzlich hast Du ja recht, kann man vielleicht einen Schalter setzen, das es physisch nicht da ist?

sonst muss ich den ganzen Datensatz löschen?

danke für den Hinweis!!!
Brummelwuff (2022-10-27 11:53:45+00:00): Ich denke löschen ist nicht direkt notwendig. Es gibt ja auch die Lifecycle prefixes um den zustand zu beschreiben. Ich denke es würde am besten removed:* passen.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:removed:*
◪ Jarv (2022-10-07 14:41:24+00:00): Hi Higgo12345, welcome to Open Street Map. In the two edits you made what are you trying to map? It appears you have tried to add some scrub within the woods as well as a piece of coastline. None of this appears to reflect what is showing on areal imagery. If you could let me know what you are trying to do and I'll see what I can do to assist you.
Kind Regards,
Thomas
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127095330
Arun Madhavan (2022-10-06 14:43:42+00:00): could shape it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127096318
Arun Madhavan (2022-10-06 14:44:33+00:00): could shape it
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/127096318
user_5359 (2022-10-06 15:56:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Healthcare
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-12-10 18:51:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10079818263/history - what you meant by power=electrical ?
skyper (2023-02-14 19:40:34+00:00): Hallo R4ss1lon,
bitte ergänze bei separat eingetragenen Trottoirs immer `footway=sidewalk` und passe auch die sidewalk-Tags der Straße entsprechend an.
Auch wäre ein aussagekräftiger Änderungssatzkommentar als nur "stegen überarbeitet" wünschenswert. Was hast Du denn konkret geändert?
Grüße,
skyper
Caconog (2022-10-07 00:50:25+00:00): Please, keep changesets/(saves) locally
Kovoschiz (2022-10-06 11:42:23+00:00): 125896795.125899891.125899201.125899117.125897623.125897588.125897548.125897332.125896912.125896876.125896822.125896795.125896578.125896523.125895298.125895099.125895015.125894946.125894883.125894042.125893997.125893643
Kovoschiz (2022-10-06 11:42:50+00:00): 125896795,125899891,125899201,125899117,125897623,125897588,125897548,125897332,125896912,125896876,125896822,125896795,125896578,125896523,125895298,125895099,125895015,125894946,125894883,125894042,125893997,125893643
mavl (2023-04-25 09:11:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
Chacra B (2022-10-06 12:03:29+00:00): Chacra B
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-12-03 12:16:36+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882858204/history ?

not:operator:wikidata=Q7988183 was present, your edit added operator:wikidata=Q7988183 

one of them is wrong

(found with https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/ - feel free to use it!)
Russ (2022-12-03 12:46:27+00:00): Interesting one! In this case I'm very confident that the not:operator:wikidata tag is wrong - I'm not sure why that was set in the first place (especially without setting an operator:wikidata tag). I've removed it.
rhtb0 (2022-10-06 12:30:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mavl (2023-06-21 16:01:31+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.