piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Anakil (2019-12-03 11:51:33+00:00): Bonjour benjabelge,

Merci pour ton ajout et tes commentaires détaillés ! J'aurais 2 petites remarques : 
- nous n'incluons généralement pas de données personnelles dans la base de données d'Openstreetmap (seul des noms publics style le nom d'un bâtiment, le nom d'un magasin, ... sont acceptés et pas "ma maison" par exemple ;-) ). Or je suppose que le nom "@ grumpy's" est une indication "privée" et je l'ai donc supprimé (corriges-moi si je me trompe);
- Pour ce qui est de l'adresse, le code postal et la ville sont optionnelles en Belgique car ils sont inférés par les polygones administratifs en-dessous (on sait dire ainsi que le bâtiment se situe dans les limites de la commune d'Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve et dans le code postal 1342 de Limelette). J'ai donc supprimé les valeurs que tu avais mises même si ce n'est pas techniquement une erreur, cela encombre juste moins les données. Et c'est toujours bon à savoir que la seule chose nécessaire à ajouter pour la Belgique est le numéro + nom de rue ! ;-)

Au sinon, pour mieux tracer des bâtiments dans le futur, tu peux aussi copier de la couche "plan" de la région wallonne (pour cela, dans l'éditeur web, il suffit de cliquer sur le bouton en forme de feuille empilée "couches" et de choisir le "PICC" au lieu de l'imagerie aérienne. Le plan a une précision <25 cm, à noter qu'il est toujours utile de vérifier l'imagerie aérienne qui elle est récente (de l'année passée en général) pour vérifier si le plan est encore à jour (car il peut avoir quelques années de retard avec la réalité selon l'endroit).  Par ailleurs, il existe un équivalent à Bruxelles (URBIS) et en Flandres (GRB) -> on est compliqué en Belgique ! ^_^'
Par ailleurs, essaye toujours de tracer au mieux (le plus précis que tu puisses) comme ça, la donnée créée est de bonne qualité pour tous. :-) 

Happy mapping,
Anakil
Membre d'OpenStreetMap Belgium
karson_ (2021-07-04 16:14:21+00:00): You shouldn't use the ford=yes tag as a way to resolve highway-waterway conflicts unless there is actually a ford. Routers will refuse to use fords since it is too risky to let a driver try and drive through a waterway.
abvincen (2021-07-05 10:06:41+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your valuable inputs.
Apologies for adding the "ford=yes" tag incorrectly.
I've made the necessary changes in the changeset #107431325.
I'll ensure to not repeat such errors going forward.
Thanks once again,Happy to learn more from you!

Regards,
abvincen.
eggie (2019-12-03 11:03:41+00:00): Dag Vpshuffler
Om te voorkomen dat die brandgangen ongewenst gaan meerouteren zet ik ze vaak op access=private. Formeel klopt dit ook.  Niemand heeft er wat te maken. 
Behalve natuurlijk als het wel belangrijke doorgaande routes zijn. 
MVG,
Eggie
SproutScout (2019-12-03 11:53:09+00:00): Hallo Eggie,
Is zeker een goed idee! Ik zal het aanpassen.

Ik had de tag's gekopiëerd van een nabije brandgang. Ik zal deze ook controleren.

Mvg,
Vpshuffler
dieterdreist (2020-01-26 15:59:12+00:00): Ciao Dino, ho visto che hai aggiunto admin_level=8 alla Zona La Giustiniana, penso sia troppo basso (sarebbe in conflitto con i Municipi che loro sono al 10). In un'altro caso ho messo 11: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10319358 e suggerisco anche qui 11. Poi farei 2 oggetti distinti per place=quarter (frazione toponomastica) e zona di Roma (admin). Che ne dici?

Un saluto,
Martin
Dino Michelini (2020-01-28 08:56:52+00:00): Ciao Martin, mi sembra di ricordare che questa relazione (Zona LIV La Giustiniana) non si riferiva al municipio Municipio Roma XV, di cui esiste una relazione con admin_level=10, ma solo al quartiere della Giustiniana. Circa l'uso di admin_level=11 non saprei se sia corretto utilizzarlo: nella wiki non cita l'Italia e per le circoscrizioni si indica l'uso di admin_level=10. Sull'utilizzo di  place=quarter sono un pò scettico poiché da quanto leggo nella wiki viene utilizzato senza il ricorso ad una relazione mentre nel caso di realtà urbane molto complesse come ad es. Roma e più in generale le città metropolitane mi sembra corretto e funzionale definire le divisioni amministrative (quartieri, circoscrizioni, città, frazioni, ecc.) tramite una o più relazioni senza dover disegnare ulteriori limiti amministrativi che, in mancanza di relazioni, andrebbero a sovrapporsi agli elementi fisici già esistenti (strade, fiumi, ecc.) rendendo molto difficile la gestione e l'aggiornamento.
dieterdreist (2020-01-28 10:11:21+00:00): Place=quarter si può applicare alle relazioni del tipo multipolygon, sono equiparati ai poligoni, "on relation" si riferisce a altri tipi di relazione. Se vedi in taginfo, a parte i nodi, sono per un terzo relazioni: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/place=quarter
Io sono a favore di utilizzare place per la toponomastica, i nomi geografici, questi in confronto alle entità amministrative (boundary=administrative e admin_level). I Municipi sono admin_level=10 perché si sono evolute dalle vecchie circoscrizioni. 

Poi ci sono le zone urbanistiche, identificate da numero (vecchio municipio) e letter consecutiva. Questi sono suddivisioni di municipi, e (secondome) possono essere mappati come admin_level=11. Il codice per la "Giustiniana" sarebbe "20G" (nel municipio ex-20). Il confine di questa zona urbanistica è identico alla "zona LIV La Giustiniana" (toponimo). 
zona urbanistica: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3771717
toponimo: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q3209413

Wikipedia ha una bella struttura che parte da qui: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suddivisioni_di_Roma
La toponomastica (che divide tutto il territorio) si compone così: Rioni (R) nel centro storico, quartieri (Q) intorno al centro, suburbi (S) oltre i quartieri, e poi Zone (Z). Oltre a questi ci sono anche i toponomi locali ("sovraposti", non necessariamente "ufficiali", ma semplicemente nomi con cui la gente si riferisce a luoghi).

Penso inserire tutte queste informazioni, oltre ad essere utile in se, sarebbe anche meglio per ridurre la confusione (se ci sono più oggetti simili, forse uno si guarda meglio il tipo di "ref"). 

Ciao,
Martin
dieterdreist (2020-01-28 10:17:32+00:00): Ho fatto un esempio qui:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10319358
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5460386
Dino Michelini (2020-01-28 11:35:59+00:00): A questo punto si dovrebbe aggiornare la pagina https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dquarter...
dieterdreist (2020-01-28 11:50:59+00:00): perché? Già specifica "on area=yes", e che non si tratta di entità amministrative.
dieterdreist (2020-01-28 11:52:23+00:00): ammetto, ho modificato anche la Giustiniana, perché sicuramente admin_level=8 non era giusto (8 sono i comuni, e 10 i municipi, quindi anche se fosse una entità amministrativa, dovrebbe stare sotto il livello 10)
Dino Michelini (2020-01-28 12:36:11+00:00): mi riferisco al Template:ValueDescription parametro |onRelation= circa l'utilizzo con  "relation" posto a (?)
dieterdreist (2020-01-28 12:45:43+00:00): come avevo scritto sopra, le relazioni del tipo multipolygon e boundary sono contenute in "area"
aceman444 (2023-07-13 10:19:35+00:00): Zdravim, pridane cycleway v dopravnom ihrisku ste uz odvolali, kedy sa chystate na vratenie napr. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/132086321, ktora asi pesou zonou nie je?
Marek Zahradnik (2023-07-13 18:58:51+00:00): vratene na foot path
aceman444 (2023-07-14 10:57:06+00:00): Dakujem
lmagreault (2019-12-03 18:36:29+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OpenStreetMap,
Le bâtiment que vous avez modifié était issu d'un import du cadastre. Dans le cadastre, la géométrie correspond à l'emprise au sol. Avez-vous modifié le bâtiment en fonction de l'emprise du toit visible sur la vue aérienne ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77869681
Jean-MichelP (2019-12-04 05:50:28+00:00): Bonjour, oui, c'est ce que j'ai fait. C'était une erreur ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77869681
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-08 18:47:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147229399, 147229339 where the changeset comment is: revert data added by mapper who used swear words for names claiming to be the 'discoverer' of places
SK53 (2023-02-04 13:03:00+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for adding this, find it a bit amazing no-one had done it before.

Technically The Kite was bounded by East Road, Maid's Causeway, Parkside, Parker St, and Emmanuel Road (hence the name). The Grafton Centre ripped the heart out of the old area. 

Will check a bit on current usage.

Jerry aka SK53
user_5359 (2019-12-03 20:14:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (only name and description, no useful information). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.osm.org.
viloan (2019-12-03 11:10:54+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Supaplex (2019-12-03 11:42:57+00:00): driveway指的是像麥當勞得來速的車道
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77871343
catdreamer (2019-12-03 11:54:33+00:00): 先改成unclassified,那一區有些還是不知該如何標示
Leo Slager (2019-12-06 21:45:50+00:00): Op de 2 wegen bij de parkeergarage heb je maxspeed=paving_stones toegevoegd.
Ik heb het even veranderd in surface=*
aceman444 (2019-12-13 06:35:27+00:00): Zdravim, dakujem za upratanie niektorych chodnikov, kde zrejme nie su povolene bicykle. Zmena na ceste https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437678798 je vsak urcite zle, asi ste zlucili niekolko usekov dohromady a teraz znacky ako lanes:forward=2; 1; 2 nedavaju zmysel. Dajte to do poriadku.
Taktiez prosim nepouzivajte znacku lcn=yes priamo na cestach, nema to ziadny oficialny vyznam, skoro to zavadza pouzivatelov, ze cesta by mohla byt sucastou nejakej cyklotrasy aj ked v skutocnosti nie je.
Dakujem.

A aky je zdroj Vasich udajov. Ziadny neuvadzate.
Marek Zahradnik (2019-12-13 10:14:55+00:00): Zdravim,
dakujem za opravenie, naozaj ulicu Polianky som zlucil omylom zle. Uz je opravena.

Chodnik https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238694342 + okolite chodniky nemaju na streetview (r2014) znacku pre bicykle, ani to nedava zmysel (aktualne napojenie)

Chodniky (+okolie)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/182824778
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/190812614
Su skor chodniky na ihrisku / dopravnom ihrisku, ktore kvazi su aj pre bicykle, ale v celkovej mape cyklotras https://mapa.cyklokoalicia.sk/pasport/public/ to posobilo trochu matuco, ked tam boli nahodne taketo cmuhy.

Tag LCN, dik za upozornenie. Priznam sa, ze som si nepozrel jeho definiciu, ze su to priamo znacene cyklotrasy. Potreboval by som oznacit dopravne upokojene cesty, ktore zaroven prepajaju existujuce cyklotrasy a daju sa teda bez problemov vyuzivat - aby si clovek mohol pozriet na spominanej mape cyklotras, kade sa vie bezpecne prepravovat (napr aj s detmi). Pre nieco take neexistuje oficialny tag? Ze radsej si zvolit custom tag a s tym potom pracovat v mape cyklotras.
aceman444 (2020-02-05 20:42:39+00:00): Prosim nekreslite nic len preto, ze to vyzera matuco na https://mapa.cyklokoalicia.sk/pasport/public/ . Ta mapa obsahuje plno nezmyslov a umyselne zavadzajucich informacii, napr. "odporucane trasy pre cyklistov", pricom v skutocnosti su to obycajne chodniky a ine objekty kde maju cyklisti zakazanu jazdu.
Zial neviem co su to "dopravne upokojene cesty", nie som odbornik. Ale cyklisti mozu jazdit zrejme po kazdej ceste, kde to nie je zakazane. Ci existuje nejaka znacka vyjadrujuca znizenu hustotu dopravy to sa mi nezda, lebo je to dost subjektivne. Treba prestudovat wiki OSM. Mozno uz samotne highway=residential alebo living_street su dost indikatormi, ze nejde o hlavny tah mestom.
mavl (2019-12-15 16:35:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 78423908, 78425731, 78431462, 78428956, 78427975, 78422742, 78430242, 78423304, 78424715, 78432742, 78426855 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
acubens71 (2019-12-04 00:51:11+00:00): Hello,
You mistakenly deleted the "landuse=forest" tags on inner forest objects.
woodpeck_repair (2024-02-08 18:47:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 147229399, 147229339 where the changeset comment is: revert data added by mapper who used swear words for names claiming to be the 'discoverer' of places
nevw (2019-12-04 09:59:51+00:00): Hi,
I reverted your business addition to the OpenStreetMap for some of the reasons listed on our wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

Adding a name and all other info in a description tag is not suitable, please use something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 or https://www.onosm.org/# to initially help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags.
PT-53 (2019-12-03 17:48:58+00:00): Hallo Arne
was willst Du den "genauer eingeben"?
Den Standort?
Wie hoch ist denn die Abweichung zum exakten Standort?

Ich habe den Vermessungspunkt seinerzeit vor Ort besichtigt und möglichst genau eingezeichnet. 

Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man%20made=survey%20point?uselang=de

Fragende Grüße
ielham (2020-10-21 22:19:02+00:00): Hola. Revisando la zona vi unos viales que no concordaban con lo que hay en el lugar ni con la imagen de satélite... Veo que es una prueba que hiciste pero no acabaste eliminándolo. ¿Lo eliminamos?
dfergar (2020-10-22 06:50:40+00:00): Si, por favor. Gracias
user_5359 (2019-12-03 20:25:16+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bitte keine Hausnummern überschreiben (das gesamte Gebäude hat die Hausnummern 2 bis 9), Du hat die einzelne Hausnummern 6 mit 2-9 überschrieben. 
Außerdem kann man nicht erkennen, was für ein Geschäft die e-lective GmbH nachgeht. Für eine bessere Beschreibung wäre wahrscheinlich die Seite https:/wiki.osm.org/wiki/DE:Key:office interessant.
user_5359 (2019-12-03 17:26:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
riysingh (2019-12-03 12:36:09+00:00): Hi,
I have made the edits in this changeset :  77876694 based on Latest Private Earth Watch Imagery.  

Regards,
riysingh.
eggie (2019-12-05 10:19:01+00:00): Dag henk.. Goed dat je zaken toevoegt, maar als je de buildingtag building=yes weghaalt zal het gebouw van de kaart verdwijnen. dat zal toch niet je bedoeling zijn?
Ik zal het gebouw herstellen.
Gr Eggie
MVG,
Eggie
GPX Speedtag (2019-12-07 02:27:29+00:00): Dat heeft ID gedaan denk ik. Ik zou niet weten waarom dat verwijderd was. Het is juist de bedoeling dat mensen er kunnen komen.
eggie (2019-12-07 07:08:05+00:00): Zou heel goed kunnen.. zie wel meer van dit soort automatische aanpassingen.. Tijd voor Josm denk ik.. gr eggie
jaimeMF (2019-12-08 21:23:14+00:00): Ya está añadida la iglesia del Corazón de María, como área: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/607882173
emvee (2019-12-03 12:50:16+00:00): Bij junction=circular moet er dan wel weer oneway=yes bij ;-)
IK19 (2019-12-03 13:09:55+00:00): oneway: yes toegevoegd. Ik kreeg het idee omdat de pijlen er netjes in stonden oneway automatisch van toepassing zou zijn. Ik ga hier meer over nalezen. Voorlopig op jullie adviezen afgegaan. Bedankt zo ver.
emvee (2019-12-03 16:45:48+00:00): Mooi, bedankt voor het bijwerken!
kuhni74 (2023-05-29 11:02:34+00:00): Das alte Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82620361 neben der Dümlerhütte ist durchaus die Stofferalm, oder nicht?
mavl (2020-02-21 16:37:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
Supaplex (2020-01-02 18:04:50+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Jose Luis Infante (2019-12-03 13:55:00+00:00): Hola,

hi ha un error en la vostra edició. Heu editat tot el polígon industrial com el vostre establiment.

Ja està arreglat.

Salutacions!
mavl (2020-02-21 16:37:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: personal data.
vt100 (2019-12-23 22:08:46+00:00): Servus Ferdi,

bitte in Zukunft roof:shape=gabled anstelle 'gabeld' verwenden. Danke! :)
map per (2021-04-18 13:52:41+00:00): Hallo pürierstab,

du hast die Reichenbergstraße in Ludwigstraße umbenannt (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/26534030). Jetzt gibt es eine Diskussion darüber ob der Name Ludwigstraße überhaupt existiert (https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2173257). Weißt du mehr dazu?

Viele Grüße
map per
Luzandro (2019-12-14 15:46:32+00:00): CS rückgängig gemacht, da zumindest die Wegweiser Richtung Husarentempel weiterhin vorhanden sind
unnic (2019-12-16 07:45:32+00:00): ja, ist korrekt. Ich hab das Attribut übersehen. Danke fürs Rückgängig machen.
Luzandro (2019-12-21 10:13:32+00:00): Ich nehme an, das gilt daher auch für diese beiden Changesets (abgesehen von den path-Details)
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77879151
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77879114
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/77879234
hüggelzwerg (2019-12-03 18:42:38+00:00): May you need this?
https://www.langstreckentouren.de/osm/takst_sjaelland.html
If you like, please recomment it ;)
Best regards
Green1984 (2019-12-04 12:29:21+00:00): Thanks. Is this page just to get an overview of the members of public transport lines and the work still to do?
hüggelzwerg (2019-12-04 16:03:46+00:00): Yes exactly. You can see which routes are available in the area and which routes can be edited. You also have a good overview of the existing (and missing) stops/platforms and stop areas. If you are working on new routes, you can send me some information, if you like: 
RelationID Number of real Bus stops Date of data collection 
Then I can integrate this information in my script.
trigpoint (2019-12-03 14:13:27+00:00): Hi, please keep your changesets to sensible areas. Please save your changes before you move to another area as a large polygon makes it difficult for local mappers to spot changes in their area.
Also please use meaningful changeset comments that describe what you are changing or adding.
Cheers Phil
Nmxosm (2019-12-04 09:05:29+00:00): Hallo Uwe Pfeffer,

in deinem Änderungssatz hast du die Filiale der Frankfurter Sparkasse (https://www.sparkasse.de/filialen/f/frankfurter-sparkasse-filiale-ostend/34095.html) gelöscht: https://osm.org/node/224035878 Laut Website besteht diese noch. War das Löschen beabsichtigt?

VlG Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2020-04-19 06:56:52+00:00): Die Filiale ist jetzt online nicht mehr auffindbar.
viloan (2019-12-03 13:23:39+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
crowens (2019-12-03 13:27:31+00:00): I tried first to add a point on the highway and the road underneath it that lined up, but that incorrectly added an intersection. So instead I added a boundary line between two points that were near each other, one on the road, one on the elevated highway.  Is there a different way I should do this? There is another spot in Towson, Maryland that has the same problem, so I want to make sure this is a good way to do it.  The boundary of Towson has errors that I am trying to fix.  I filled in a bunch of missing sections along Loch Raven Boulevard, but there are still two places (this being one) that don't make a completely enclosed section.
crowens (2019-12-03 13:36:03+00:00): Also added https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77880658
Minh Nguyen (2019-12-03 15:52:32+00:00): What you did in this changeset is a decent workaround, but I think it shows why it’s suboptimal to make roads themselves members of a boundary relation.

The alternative is to map a distinct way (which can be untagged or tagged boundary=administrative) to serve as the boundary relation’s member way. (You’ve started to do that, but only where there’s an overpass.) That boundary way can be joined to the roadway if it’s important to state that the roadway is defined as the border of the town, or it can be kept separate if the border just happens to coincide with the roadway around here.

At the point where the bridge crosses over Loch Raven Blvd., the boundary way can jump from one roadway to the other; the specific location wouldn’t make much difference as long as the roadways don’t intersect.
crowens (2019-12-03 17:00:23+00:00): Thanks! That helps a lot, I can see why it makes sense to not have them as roadways.  I was completing work someone else seemed to have started. I might do the next town over, so I may change over the border along Loch Raven to be a separate way.  Thanks!
Tomas Straupis (2019-12-03 14:44:25+00:00): Nesvarbu, yra pamatai, ar nėra, jei realybėje toje vietoje matosi kažkoks pastatas (net jei tai pavėsinė), tai jis gali būti pažymėtas OSM. Žinoma jei jo plotas nėra tarkim kvadratinis metras, pvz. bičių avylys :-)