piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
skorasaurus (2015-06-26 16:46:32+00:00): 
Hi, this is a private access road used for the ice cream factory that is here.
Luis36995 (2015-09-24 22:45:37+00:00): Hello skorasaurus:
Thanks for adding that extra attribute on the road!
Luis
naoliv (2015-06-12 17:44:31+00:00): Márcio, não deleta um nó para criá-lo de novo.
Aproveite o que já existe.
Thundercel (2015-06-12 18:46:05+00:00): Em meu PC, quando não consigo identificar um determinado problema, excluo o sistema ou programa existente e reinsta-lo novamente.
Qual o erro em se excluir um ponto e reinclui-lo novamente no mesmo lugar?
Creio que existem muitos editores cometendo erros grosseior spor aí e que merecem atenção. Agora mesmo ando refazendo quase todas as edições de São Luis, no Maranhão. Seria interessante nos preocuparmos com esses erros grosseiros existentes no mapa.
naoliv (2015-06-12 19:27:31+00:00): O erro é que você acaba com todo o histórico que um objeto possui, incluindo todas as contribuições que várias pessoas fizeram.
OSM não funciona dando reboot nem reset em nada.
E não existe erro grosseiro na mapa, é sério.
Thundercel (2015-06-12 19:50:33+00:00): Por gentileza, acabei de abrir um debate na lista talk-br sobre o assunto. Vamos debater lá.
Josef73 (2019-01-13 11:03:23+00:00): The shop still exist?
ViriatoLusitano (2015-06-14 14:49:10+00:00): Obrigado por voltares ao OSM! :)
GerdP (2017-09-05 12:46:00+00:00): Hi!
Please review highway=services
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353250865
Is that a typo (instead of highway=service) or is there a service area next to it?
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=services
Littlebtc (2015-06-15 13:29:38+00:00): 我把紅綠燈加回去了

http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31983856

因為類似的狀況不只發生一次了，所以不知道您是不是有特殊顧慮 Orz 歡迎訊息聯絡。
Bryce C Nesbitt (2015-11-29 08:38:10+00:00): This dnode http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/192039405 is tagged as a do it yourself tool station.  Should this be a shop instead?
marl (2015-12-19 19:12:56+00:00): Oh - yes.
Thanks, fixed.
maraf24 (2015-06-12 23:04:45+00:00): Jakieś prymitywne narzędzie ten osmose.
lanes=4 nie wymaga specyfikowania lanes:forward i lanes:backward jeśli podział jest równy.
LeoKutno (2015-06-13 06:23:46+00:00): Być może, ale nie wszystkie nawigacje muszą mieć funkcje odejmowania/dodawania pasów, a po 2 jest szybciej gdy nawigacja bierze informacje prosto z tagu niż miałaby to obliczyć na podstawie pasów.
maraf24 (2015-06-13 13:10:13+00:00): Nieprawda. Każda nawigacja musi mieć taką funkcję. To jest standardowa metoda uwzględniona w wiki.
Gdyby tak było, to musiałbyś też poprawiać lanes=2 i dawać lanes:forward=1 i lanes:backward=1. 
I pewnie nie doczytałeś, ale lanes które tak pracowicie poprawiasz ze względu na ograniczenia (pasy rowerowe) uchodzi już za przeżytek. Wszystko da się zrobić przy użyciu ":lanes". I dopiero tutaj pojawia się problem nawigacji, które nie czytają tego rozszerzenia.
mhenson (2015-06-13 20:52:29+00:00): your imagery is outdated. please revert change set
samely (2015-06-15 13:36:17+00:00): Hey there. Thanks for your feedback again. I've already reverted the changeset.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31984193
Thundercel (2015-06-12 19:04:35+00:00): O marco zero da cidade de São carlos é em frente a catedral onde havia eu colocado o POI da cidade.
Por que foi retirado dali?
Thundercel (2015-06-12 19:08:16+00:00): Por favor, já que reeditou, faça na busca aparecer a relação municipio e o poi da cidade separadamente.
O POI da cidade aparece como admin_centre na relação, mas na busca não aparece isoladamente como deveria devido ao place=city.
Thundercel (2015-06-12 19:11:49+00:00): Observe, por exemplo, a cidade de Concordia, SC


    Limite de Município Concórdia, Microrregião de Concórdia, Mesorregião do Oeste Catarinense, Santa Catarina, Região Sul, Brasil

    Cidade Concórdia, Microrregião de Concórdia, Mesorregião do Oeste Catarinense, Santa Catarina, Região Sul, 89700000, Brasil

pelo nominatim aparece a relação indexada como limite de municipio e a cidade também indexada
Thundercel (2015-06-12 19:13:14+00:00): Deixei São carlos desse jeito e infelizmente foi reeditado voltando o erro anterior.
naoliv (2015-06-12 19:21:35+00:00): Márcio, não existe erro nenhum na cidade de São Carlos.
Erro foi você ter excluído um objeto que já possuia histórica e mais informação do que o novo que você inseriu.
naoliv (2015-06-12 19:22:08+00:00): *histórico
Thundercel (2015-06-12 19:37:30+00:00): Se não existe erro acabei de enviar para a lista talk-br a situação encontrada e perguntando a diferença. Por gentileza comente lá já que sua reedição fez o que la comentei retornar.
Thundercel (2015-06-12 21:39:32+00:00): O marco zero de São Carlos é a praça da catedral e não o quarteirão adjacente a ela.
Endres Pelka (2015-06-14 06:50:04+00:00): Why is the building so crooked?
Betty Catani (2015-06-14 13:55:46+00:00): Jedrzej Pelka, el edificio no está torcido, yo trace torcidas las líneas. La escuela esta construida sobre un terreno irregular. Es muy grande, tiene 3 alas, 2 pisos y 3 patios.
Endres Pelka (2015-06-14 20:18:20+00:00): If the building is not "torcido" in reality, then please draw it correctly here too. Your editor should have a function for making shapes orthogonal. And for schools, we use tag amenity=school. Didn't you read the OpenStreetMap Wiki at all?
Betty Catani (2015-06-14 21:18:32+00:00): Gracias por tus correcciones, soy nueva en OPS. y estoy aprendiendo a usarlo.
Endres Pelka (2015-06-15 15:46:11+00:00): You edited it and straightened the building, gracias! There seem to be some random pieces with "building=yes emergency=yes" colinear with the building outline. But keep up doing good work.
Endres Pelka (2015-06-14 06:50:23+00:00): Please use "yes", not "si".
Alan Bragg (2015-08-14 13:53:30+00:00): Hi, the natural=tree_group is not a common tag. Using natural=wood is a good tag for a tree covered area and renders nicely.
MikeOMadeIt (2015-08-14 14:07:23+00:00): Cool. Thanks for the heads-up. I wasn't sure but I'll try that out.
zstadler (2017-03-27 11:59:26+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353268547
has no tags. What is it?
zstadler (2021-07-11 12:28:46+00:00): Fixed in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50227164
GerdP (2023-08-22 08:02:00+00:00): Moin aus Wildeshausen!
Du hast hier aus motorroad=yes and no gemacht. Ich bin am 19.8. an dieser Kreuzung gewesen https://www.osm.org/node/2367547465
und habe die Schilder-Kombination Kraftfahrtstraße + Zusatzschild Landwirtsch. Verkehr frei gesehen. War das damals anders? Ich hätte bei https://www.osm.org/way/22912020
auf jeden Fall ein motorroad=yes gesetzt, nur für das Zusatzschild scheint es unklar zu sein, siehe https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/kraftfahrstrassen-mit-landwirtschaftlicher-verkehr-frei/5701/1
GerdP (2023-08-22 08:02:50+00:00): Tippfehler: "motorroad=yes and no" sollte "motorroad=yes ein no" sein.
user_5359 (2015-12-05 05:37:51+00:00): Please see http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/353280849 : Did yo mean maxspeed=50 instead ç=50 ?
SomeoneElse (2016-12-12 22:23:00+00:00): Hello,
I don't know what happened here, but https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3590668378/history got added in the middle of the sea.
I've deleted it.
Best Regards,
Andy
Nakaner (2015-11-15 16:21:53+00:00): Mir ist es jetzt zum ersten Mal passiert, dass ich anhand von schon erfassten Blockkennzeichen Hektometertafeln eingetragen habe.

Am 15.8.2015 habe ich bei einer ICE-Fahrt mit rurseekatze Blockkennzeichen in Bezug auf Hektometertafeln notiert. Anstatt die Blockkennzeichen mappen zu können (da hast du in diesem und anderen Changesets fleißige Arbeit geleistet), habe ich Hektometertafeln ergänzt. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35330854
gormo (2015-06-13 10:43:56+00:00): Hi, could you have a look at the Bergen/Samnanger Boundary relations? They broke somehow, and I am not sure how to fix those. Thanks!
gormo (2015-06-14 20:55:39+00:00): (fixed now by wambacher)
neiljp (2016-04-23 11:25:47+00:00): Just looking at trig points and wondering if the man_made=survey_point is specifically a survey_point=triangulation.
spark (2016-04-23 19:42:05+00:00): Not sure exactly what the differences between triangulation,fixed_point or benchmark are! Here's a couple of photos of the concrete pillar from when I surveyed it last year: https://goo.gl/photos/UNGpNuy3LUAc8Zcv8 and https://goo.gl/photos/PEoEjC1hNumkykGu6
neiljp (2016-04-23 21:40:01+00:00): A benchmark appears to be regarding elevation (vertical!), and often in the side of a pillar (though I *think* I've seen them in the side of a wall/building):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benchmark_%28surveying%29
With a pillar being used for horizontal positioning?
Although I just tagged the broad hill one with survey_point=triangulation, it may well have a "benchmark", and key=value1;value2 doesn't work well, so maybe man_made=survey_point+triangulation_pillar=yes+benchmark=yes? Possibly a tagging list discussion is warranted; I've not looked on taginfo too much either.
Josef73 (2015-06-14 15:06:24+00:00): Guten Tag, mit diesem  Änderungssatz wurde der Tag addr:country = DE an verschieden Objekten hinzugefügt. Auch an Objekten die den Tag memorial:addr = * enthalten.war das Absicht hier doppelte Daten zu erzeugen? Gruß
gormo (2015-06-18 07:22:07+00:00): Wenn man >7600 Objekte auf einen Schlag ändert sollte man vorher auch mal diskutieren. Gabs Diskussionen mit der lokalen Community, im Idealfall auch die korrekte Durchführung der "Mechanical Edit"-Policy?
naoliv (2015-06-13 02:32:47+00:00): Pablo, essa sua edição não está muito correta.
Você apagou uma rodovia (se ela está errada ou deslocada, é só ajustá-la, e não apagá-la) e também colocou toda o limite da cidade como área residencial.
Isso é errado, já que a cidade não é composta apenas de residências (mas também possui praças, áreas comerciais, cemitério, indústrias, etc)
Estela Mestre (2015-06-13 01:46:06+00:00): Colegio Parroquial Cristo Rey en sus niveles  educación inicial , primaria  y secundaria
jumbanho (2015-06-13 12:40:28+00:00): Are you sure that 29527825 isn't there?  It's on the official 2012 map and has many strava traces along it.  I also remember using it 15 years ago and it was a big wide path.
ChelvisGeocacher (2015-06-13 14:02:35+00:00): Your recollections are correct.  I used this trail myself almost daily for the first 29 years I lived in Northfield.  Erosion has always been an issue on this trail.  Last fall, after a particularly heavy rainstorm, this short connector trail was closed.  My hope was that it was a temporary closure, but there has been no work done since that time.  A significant (for pedistrians) pile of dirt has been arrayed across the top entrance, and no mowing or other regular maintenance has been done this year.  Two days ago, as I ran by the top entrance to the trail, I decided traversing the trail would feel more like bushwhacking than an easy hike; the undergrowth covering the trail had become significant.

It is my hope that this section will be reopened, but the Arboretum staff had tried several heroic erosion control projects over the past few years, and none of them worked.  If the segment is reopened, I will gladly return it to the map

A new trail, opened about three years ago, connects the ridge top trail to the ridge floor trail about 400 years east of the trail we're talking about.  I wonder if Carleton feels this is an adequate replacement.
jumbanho (2015-06-13 14:14:47+00:00): Great, thanks for the confirmation.  I actually did some of the work on this trail in the early 90's and couldn't believe they would give up on it.  It's probably for the best that they close it.  Thanks for the timely and accurate mapping!
neuhausr (2015-06-22 14:34:50+00:00): wondering why you made this a coastline?? that tag is reserved for ocean coasts only (the great lakes are a notable exception) because it's much harder to deal with both in editing and rendering
muralito (2015-07-17 02:38:50+00:00): Victor, no parece razonable la maxima de 110 en la zona urbana de Cruz del Eje. 
¿Vos lo relevaste y es asi o quedo por error al ponerle maxima a un tramo muy largo?
Víctor L (2015-07-17 09:14:26+00:00): Seguramene fué un error. La zona (la travesía urbana) está en obras así que las máximas, en partes, es entre 20 y 40. Igualmente ya lo corregí y lo dejé en blanco. Espero para Diciembre volver a pasar por esa zona y haré un nuevo revelamiento.
woodpeck (2015-06-16 17:56:15+00:00): There appears to be a problem with this import, as it imports obejcts that were explicitly not planned to be imported. See "imports" mailing list. Please do not continue the import until this is resolved.
muralito (2015-06-14 01:33:07+00:00): El marco de la frontera es el del medio. En realidad es el unico marco. Los otros dos no son marcos. Ademas la imagen bing esta desplazada. 

Solo hay mas de un marco en zonas donde no se puede poner uno en el medio.
smaprs (2015-06-14 02:22:29+00:00): Você fala do http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2546372061 e os outros dois de cada lado da fronteira? Foi outro usuário que marcou antes. O que são? Postes e uma cerca?
muralito (2015-06-14 02:38:24+00:00): Si, parecen postes de una cerca. 
Ademas, aunque sean marcos de frontera, no son "survey_point" porque no tienen ese uso.
El etiquetado mas correcto seria historic=boundary_stone

Los marcos son, por ejemplo, los nodos de la linea https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233815821
smaprs (2015-06-14 02:45:24+00:00): Ok, vou deletar os 2 nós e corrigir a linha para "fence"
smaprs (2015-06-14 20:33:41+00:00): Estes marcos na linha de fronteira que você citou tem coordenadas exatas? Se pode usar para ajustar o offset das imagens.
muralito (2015-06-15 00:01:05+00:00): No estoy seguro. La linea tenia otra forma, menos precisa, y yo la ajuste a que cada nodo estuviera sobre un marco (de la imagen en ese momento)

Luego de mi ajuste las imágenes se han desplazado varias veces, y decidí no ajustar mas nada hasta no conseguir las coordenadas exactas, porque no podía garantizar una mejora.
smaprs (2015-06-15 01:18:15+00:00): Sim, claro. Estou procurando se o IBGE tem as coordenadas exatas de marcos, se poderia ter vários pontos com que ajustar as imagens. Encontrei só de algumas estações de GPS. Esta (http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3595097351) ao que parece caiu apenas com uma diferença de uns 5m para Oeste do local indicado (http://www.bdg.ibge.gov.br/bdg/pdf/relatorio.asp?L1=94048) , parece que ali está bem locada a imagem.
LakatosVL (2018-11-16 11:07:12+00:00): Hello,
this is a huge changeset, at this location -31.18719, 148.5420291 I found that the old name is Ulundry Road, but the LPI NSW Base Map shows Nortongong Road. Can you confirm which one is correct.
Thanks
cleary (2018-11-17 00:54:52+00:00): I have recorded that I obtained the name from a sign at the intersection with Castlereagh Highway approx 3 years ago. I drove on Castlereagh Highway again in approx April or May this year, correcting any discrepancies in OSM but did not change that road name, so that I think that the signed name, Ulundry Road,  is probably correct. In my experience, the LP! NSW Base Map sometimes shows old names (especially in rural areas of the state) as the map seems to rely on local councils to inform LPI of updates and this seems not always to happen.  The Coonamble Shire Council is the ultimate authority on road names in its area. Perhaps you could contact them in business hours , explain the two apparent conflicting sources, and obtain their advice on the correct name. In regard to road names, I would accept whatever the shire council says.
LakatosVL (2018-11-17 19:39:42+00:00): Thanks for a answer, I will put altname from LPI NSW Base Map until we get another information.
cleary (2019-01-22 06:50:28+00:00): The LPI NSW Address Location Service is a permitted data source for OSM. While the LPI Base Map contains some errors, I have found the Address Location Service to be always correct. This service identifies the road as Nortongang Road so I accept that as the current and correct name. I will leave it to you to alter the name in OSM.  I will probably drive in that location in coming months and I will look again for the current sign post. Thanks for your work on OSM.
LakatosVL (2019-01-22 08:48:15+00:00): Thanks Cleary. I altered name as shows LPI NSW Base Map. If you find that the name has changed, be free to change it.
cleary (2019-04-16 06:46:45+00:00): I surveyed again in this area last week. The road is signposted as Ulundry Road at the western end (Castlereagh Highway) and as Nortongang Road at the eastern end. I have contacted Coonamble Shire Council to see if one sign is error or if name changes aprtway along the road.
Kolesár (2015-10-05 03:30:31+00:00): A name=Kémény helyett az alábbi címke használatos: man_made=chimney
drjones1 (2015-10-05 18:52:08+00:00): OK
user_5359 (2015-06-14 05:14:16+00:00): Hallo, gibt es eine Begründung warum der Name des Hotels gelöscht wurde? Laut Internetseite existiert das Hotel noch!
mbank (2015-06-14 07:59:23+00:00): Außer Hotel Mama ist dort definitiv kein Hotel. Ich wohne in der STrasse. Es gibt noch einen anderen Kirchweg in Köln.
user_5359 (2015-06-14 08:41:09+00:00): Dann ist es sinnvoll nicht nur den Namen sondern auch die Bezeichnung zu löschen.
mbank (2015-06-14 15:33:32+00:00): ? Sorry, ich dachte, ich hätte als Wohnhaus 1 Etage getagged.
Philipp Stöppke (2017-12-20 11:37:19+00:00): Is the bunker (Linie: 353390079) you created here rely a bunker our just a wrong click?
N16h7 (2017-12-20 14:32:07+00:00): It's some kind of bunker (more a building), but i'm not really sure if it's still there.
Tomas_J (2025-10-14 13:24:43+00:00): Zdar, toto (Way: 353391829) je skor traffic_island nez highway=pedestrian. Vsimol som si, ze viac dopravnych ostrovcekov si oznacit takto (podla mna) nespravne...
Jose Riha (2025-10-14 13:45:01+00:00): ahoj, v case editu sa to takto znacilo. navyse, nie som si isty, mi uz renderer traffic island podporuje. kludne to ale aktualizuj. j
Tomas_J (2025-10-14 16:53:20+00:00): Hm, je to de facto, asi preto to renderer nepodporuje, ale príde mi to lepšie než highway=pedestrian, po dopravnom ostrovčeku sa väčšinou nechceš prechádzať :). 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:area:highway%3Dtraffic_island
Kaziu Kisiel (2015-06-15 10:27:42+00:00): on osm ONLY M1 is signed good. 

Please to change M2, M4 and M5 signification from "highway=motorway" to "highway=trunk".
nyampire (2015-07-08 02:28:37+00:00): この編集の中で、市町村より下の階層の多くのplaceノードが、place=hamletに変更されています。

こちらの編集の意図を教えていただけますでしょうか。

現在日本地域で行われているplaceタグの議論では、hamletは使わず、町名/大字に対してはquarter、丁目/小字に対してはneighbourhoodを利用するということになっています。

* http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:%E4%BD%8F%E6%89%80
* https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1eAE72mjCLoJVGZo5qRhCYK22UxVQ8bpbQSU9ZLHq40o/edit#gid=0

お手数をおかけしますが、よろしくお願いします。
VJean (2016-02-03 00:20:10+00:00): остановка "Супермаркет "Линия" по стороне "из города" через дорогу от Линии реально существует?
0leg-ch (2016-02-03 15:56:15+00:00): Формально остановки там нет. Но автобусы 111, 112 и, возможно, какие-то ещё междугородные подбирают стоящих там людей.

Название, кстати, надо бы уточнить. "Супермаркет" я брал из таблицы тарифов 112-го маршрута. Как на др. маршрутах, и как на самой остановке -- надо смотреть...
VJean (2016-02-03 16:11:10+00:00): остановка по требованию? странно. В этом направлении должны останавливаться на Спецавтохозяйстве. Там [на линии], вроде, вообще запрещена остановка маршрутного транспорта.
Название в 2гисе правильное: "гипермаркет Линия", сам же рисовал и выверял.
сейчас выверяю и проставляю все остановки по городу, с учетом текущей чехарды из гортранса. До восточной части города еще не дошел, думаю к концу недели все остановки и маршруты будут добавлены и исправлены. Тогда и исправлю названия.
Skippern (2015-06-13 13:57:38+00:00): Favor nao muda clasificacao do BR-101 no Espírito Santo, o trecho enteiro, fora do Serra, Cariacica e Viana deve continuar ser highway=primary, e somente entre esses 3 cidades e highway=trunk
Josef73 (2018-10-19 14:52:58+00:00): The "2x1 express" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3592091741) opens only on sundays?
Skippern (2015-06-13 13:55:50+00:00): Favor nao muda clasificacao do BR-101 no Espírito Santo, o trecho enteiro, fora do Serra, Cariacica e Viana deve continuar ser highway=primary, e somente entre esses 3 cidades e highway=trunk
naoliv (2015-06-13 17:04:55+00:00): User006, por favor, pergunte na comunidade antes de fazer alterações dessa forma.
Existe um padrão já discutido e definido para classificar as rodovias e alterá-la sem discussão apenas gera trabalho e problema.
Skippern (2015-06-13 13:46:10+00:00): Favor nao muda clasificacao do BR-101 no Espírito Santo, o trecho enteiro, fora do Serra, Cariacica e Viana deve continuar ser highway=primary, e somente entre esses 3 cidades e highway=trunk
Skippern (2015-06-13 13:49:02+00:00): Favor nao muda clasificacao do BR-101 no Espírito Santo, o trecho enteiro, fora do Serra, Cariacica e Viana deve continuar ser highway=primary, e somente entre esses 3 cidades e highway=trunk
SomeoneElse (2017-01-07 12:16:58+00:00): Oops - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2694560369 is "building=shop=*signs"?
Cheers,
Andy
brianboru (2017-04-17 09:09:52+00:00): finger trouble again. Node deleted, name added to building, with shop=yes
Skippern (2015-06-13 14:27:36+00:00): Eu preciso reverter muitos do seus changesets do hoje, voce fiz muitos danos. Infelizmente não tem tempo resolver agora, se voce não resolver mesmo ate hoje a tarde eu vou reverter tudo seus trabalhos do hoje - isso e demais danos para verificar cada um objeto
Skippern (2015-06-13 15:19:05+00:00): Voce entendo o que voce fazendo? Esses changesets e muito destrutiveis, voce terminando quebrar muitos relações de restrições necessario para roteamento - so para avisar todos seus changesets feito no BR-101 hoje vai ser revertido
aharvey (2017-10-31 11:46:39+00:00): Any reason https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/260879705 was changed to bicycle=no? I rode over the bridge today and couldn't find any signs forbidding bicycles.
mrpulley (2017-10-31 21:40:45+00:00): It's been a couple of years since I've been there, but I think there might have been a sign directing cyclists to use the adjacent footbridge. I don't have the voice recordings made that far back to check. It may have changed since then.
aharvey (2017-11-01 00:17:58+00:00): There is a bicycle=dismount sign on the footbridge which I've mapped and an arrow on the road pointing bicycles to divert to footbridge but nothing forbidding it.

At the moment routers might decide to skip it since it's dismount and no, but in reality you can ride on the road.

I'm not 100% sure either but I might remove the bicycle=no.
aharvey (2018-04-29 06:11:17+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3592233612/history you've set the isced:level as 0-1. In Australia 0 is preschool, before primary school. Are you sure this school includes preschool, under Kindergarten? The NSW Public Schools database says it only starts at Kindergarten.
mrpulley (2018-04-29 22:37:59+00:00): I'll have a look at this (and the other changesets) tonight after work.
aharvey_imports (2018-04-29 23:23:06+00:00): Thanks. My rational is that https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:isced:level says level 1 is primary education and in NSW most primary schools are K-6 so K should be considered part of level 1. Confirmed since normally it's started around age 5.

level 0, pre-primary, before primary school, designed to introduce very young children to a school-type environment, which sounds like preschool.

I while back I documented this for Australia at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:isced:level#Conversion_of_local_terms as well prior consulting feedback at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2017-December/011558.html
mrpulley (2018-04-30 11:47:27+00:00): ISCED 1 is correct (i.e. no preschool) - I've fixed this at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/58552383
HolgerJeromin (2015-06-15 10:48:12+00:00): Danke schön.
Magst du das für die Linie 12 auch noch machen?