piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-07-25 14:25:11+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2019-07-25 14:32:23+00:00): Top! Helemaal correct.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-25 14:35:17+00:00): Het vreemde op de Eindhovense weg is dat er geen afslagen zijn voor fietsers naar de straten aan de overzijde. Fietsers doen dat natuurlijk wel. Ik heb het op twee plaatsen opgelost door highway=path surface=paved te mappen en bij de bosstraat een highway=service onder die woningen te mappen. Wellicht zou je als lokale mapper eens kunnen kijken. 
Gr eggie
viloan (2019-07-25 14:31:02+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:31:30+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:33:30+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:34:03+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
eggie (2019-07-25 15:26:53+00:00): Dag Mark, Meyer & Meyer zit ook al op dat nummer. Kun je nog eens kijken?
In OSM maken we niet zelf adressen aan. Die zijn al aanwezig.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-07-25 15:29:46+00:00): M.a.w.  bestaat Meyer en Meyer nog wel hier?
Mark van Elswijk (2019-07-25 15:38:41+00:00): Denk ik niet volgens mijn dat niet meer in etten leur kijk maar via Google.nl en via site van meyer& Meyer
eggie (2019-07-25 16:23:38+00:00): Oke... lijkt mij ook en dat had ik ook gecheckt.... ik zet de info van het restaurant over naar de Kadasternode.
Mvg.. eggie
eggie (2019-07-25 16:27:27+00:00): Done..
Bagoap (2020-08-19 10:54:12+00:00): Comment is onjuist (flaw van Go Map). Hier is een camping aangegeven.
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:36:01+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
user_5359 (2019-07-26 20:59:17+00:00): Hello! You add some very unusual, not english key. Could you please explain the meaning of the keys: Data Peralatan RS, Direktur RS, Jenis RS, Kelas RS, Kode RS, Luas Bangunan, Luas Tanah, Pemilik RS, Status Akreditasi, service layanan  ?
mueschel (2019-07-29 16:29:26+00:00): There are 20 tags like this I found:

Data Peralatan RS
Direketur RS
Direktur RS
Jenis RS
Kelas RS
kelas RS
Kode Rs
Kode RS
luas Bangunan
Luas Bangunan
Luas Tanah
Pemilik
Pemilik RS
Service Layanan unggulan
service layanan unggulan
service Layanan Unggulan
Service Pelayanan Unggulan
Status Akreditasi
Status Akreditasi RS
Status Akrteditasi
imamsafii (2019-08-01 07:50:32+00:00): I use language Indonesian
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:38:42+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
downwarddog (2019-07-30 02:13:28+00:00): Did you see my comment here? https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68587889. When you combine roads, you add the tags to the entire length of road. This means that you have tagged most of the roads in Central Yaounde as oneway, when these roads are not actually oneway. Can you fix this?
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:40:05+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
grabtaxi13 (2019-11-25 07:41:15+00:00): Changeset comment contains a wrong GitHub link. The correct one is: https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32
konrad_ickinger (2019-07-30 05:41:29+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-25 18:28:15+00:00): Hi RodriguezJoa, welcome to OSM.

Is this an import of address data?

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=72651123

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
mavl (2019-09-23 19:45:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 74820738, 74822879, 74814973, 74824689 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: copyrighted source].
sannkc (2019-07-28 19:32:32+00:00): Hello! I was reviewing some St. Louis edits and happened to see this changeset. I can see what prompted the change. There's definitely a sign that prohibits commercial vehicles from accessing the street unless making deliveries.

What I'm unsure about is the access=destination tag. That tag implies that nothing (including commercial vehicles, regular vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, etc.) is allowed to pass along the street unless going to a destination along the street. But that doesn't appear to be the case here, since the restriction applies to a specific type of user/vehicle and a specific type of activity.

Based on the guidance in the OSM wikis, I'm thinking that goods=delivery and hgv=delivery would be more appropriate tags here. I'm interpreting the sign's statement about "loading unloading" as equivalent to "delivery." And I'm also assuming that "commercial vehicles" covers all types of goods vehicles and not just heavy goods vehicles. The sign also says that commercial vehicles may engage in "servicing," but I'm not sure how to best express that in an OSM tag. Any thoughts?
gseethar (2019-07-31 18:17:31+00:00): Hi Sannkc,

Thanks a lot for your suggestion. We will definitely take this up and perform our analysis and get back to you at the earliest.

Please continue to provide your valuable suggestions that will help us further improve our edits.

Regards,
Ganesh
Autofan (2019-07-25 20:18:16+00:00): Garagen sind keine Häuser
RicoElectrico (2019-08-10 09:05:12+00:00): Witaj, to molo wcale nie jest takich rozmiarów. Wystarczy spojrzeć na zdjęcia w niskiej rozdzielczości. Widać, że rysowałeś je na oko, czego nie robi się w OSM. Jak chcesz zrobić to dobrze, to wejdź na nie i zbierz współrzędne końców GPS-em w telefonie.

https://apps.sentinel-hub.com/sentinel-playground/?source=S2&lat=53.351415880708785&lng=17.496832609176636&zoom=16&preset=1-NATURAL-COLOR&layers=B01,B02,B03&maxcc=37&gain=1.0&gamma=1.0&time=2019-02-01%7C2019-08-09&atmFilter=ATMCOR&showDates=true
pyram (2020-03-16 21:13:09+00:00): Hallo realwalk,
danke für's update im Neubaugebiet. Ich habe jetzt einfach einmal den Acker dort entfernt und dabei Folgendes gesehen:
Bei dem Weg  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/374862217 ist irgendwas schiefgelaufen:
Es erscheint mir sehr unwahrscheinlich, dass die dortigen Landwirte nur zu Fuß zu ihren Äckern dürfen - und das mit einem maxspeed von 30 km/h ;-)

Gruß
pyram
juminet (2019-07-29 18:38:22+00:00): Hello/bonjour,

Welcome to OSM! I wonder if this road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707354256#map=16/50.4616/5.7577) that you add to OSM really exist in reality. I've been there several time and I doubt there is a road (highway=unclassified), furthermore that is oneway. In addition, the road cross some waterways several times without bridge or ford which is raising some errors in the editors.

Should this way be kept in OSM?

Bienvenue sur OSM! Je me demande si cette route (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707354256#map=16/50.4616/5.7577) existe vraiment dans la réalité. J'ai été sur place plusieurs fois et ne l'ai jamais vue, surtout une route à sens unique. De plus, la route croise des ruisseaux plusieurs fois sans pont ou gué, ce qui est censé faire apparaitre des erreurs dans les éditeurs. 

Est-ce que cette route doit rester dans OSM?

Merci de votre participation, 

Happy mapping,

juminet
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-25 18:22:05+00:00): Hi 12345adad, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind removing the tag amenity=hunting_stand @ the following node: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1769006267/history

Thanks.

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
4004 (2019-07-27 21:46:01+00:00): здравствуйте,
тип обьекта не нужно писать в название - это не имя. для описания используются теги, их можно выбрать поиском если нажать на здание, потом сверху слева на плашку здание - и потом искать. пройдите обучение в редакторе, если интерестно
DUGA (2021-08-31 03:10:12+00:00): The entire area, which you added using Mapbox, has offset issue.
user_5359 (2019-07-25 19:39:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on your objects, specially for the house https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707358146 . This is the coorect way to add a house with an address
user_5359 (2019-07-25 19:27:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please?
Hykkonen (2019-07-26 13:45:45+00:00): Thank you! I presume the housenumber request is for the added row homes. What is the procedure for house numbers for row homes where there are several associated with a building?
user_5359 (2019-07-26 16:13:07+00:00): If there are several house numbers in a building, then you set several points with the corresponding addresses. In the case of multi-level houses, you can supplement the floor (with the key level).
MerlinPendragon (2019-07-25 22:42:48+00:00): Hello! Could you provide a source for this edit? It seems unlikely that this house has been expanded to such an irregular shape, taking out four other houses with it.
GinaroZ (2019-09-06 12:44:23+00:00): Why did you add the name of a roundabout as a hamlet? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6647315832
RicoElectrico (2019-07-27 01:32:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6646589607

Trochę dziwne te klucze opisujące płatność

Patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment
chnav (2019-07-26 06:08:29+00:00): Дубликат здания удалил.
user_5359 (2019-07-25 19:25:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved a node over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/410798726/history
user_5359 (2019-07-25 19:21:25+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Smal rue: A object have never a name with is the combination of other key.
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-25 18:25:10+00:00): #test #failed ?

Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you? Furthermore, can you revert your edits?

--- 
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
user_5359 (2019-07-25 19:16:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! the coorect tagging of a tree is the tag "natural"="tree". I have correct this.
pitscheplatsch (2019-07-26 05:03:53+00:00): Hi @lilhaircut,
furthermore, you shouldn't use the name tag to describe objects. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name name tag

Thanks @user_5359 for correcting it.
muralito (2019-07-25 17:59:53+00:00): There was no missing way here. Gestido ends in Obligado, and Obligado the street that intersects Avenida Brasil.
CapAhab (2019-07-25 18:09:01+00:00): It appeared to be a connection in imagery, but I now see in Mapillary it is not.  Thanks for fixing this
phidauex (2019-07-25 19:01:44+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If I can offer a tip, even for your first edits, when drawing a sidewalk, make sure to connect it to the road in the same place that a person would cross - that way pedestrian routing software knows how someone would get to the sidewalk.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72656307
phidauex (2019-07-25 18:57:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM! If I can offer a helpful tip for working with buildings, after sketching it as accurately as you can, select the building and hit the "q" key, which will square the building and correct the angles, making for a much better final product.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72656338
Palolo (2019-07-26 23:29:02+00:00): Please only map buildings.
viloan (2019-07-25 17:55:50+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Weft (2020-02-26 10:25:14+00:00): Bonjour,
Pouvez-vous préciser les directions de chacune des voies ? Cela n'a pas été mis à jour avec la réduction du nombre de voies.
Merci
JesseFTW (2019-09-14 06:20:44+00:00): I've now connected the newly added lines to the larger line that they spliced into. Let me know if that's incorrect.
freebeer (2019-07-28 07:16:06+00:00): moin, doktor bacon...

i'm trying to figure what went wrong with https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48012847 which it appears this changeset recycled the southern lake nodes to form part of a residential boundary.

do you think you could figure how to fix things in josm, as the v3 shown looks unchanged since it looked good, and only the nodes have been altered individually, which will be a pain without josm to repair node by node.

thanks
DoctorSpeck (2019-07-28 20:06:08+00:00): thanks for the catch of my error. It should be corrected with: https://openstreetmap.org/changeset/72746043
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/72657807
Tomas Straupis (2019-07-25 19:25:29+00:00): Changed newly added duplicate of Šakiai to place=locality, as there is only ONE village Šakiai in that region.
Are you sure the names are contemporary? „Neu Schäcken“ does not look like translation of „Šakiai“. „Uszkullmen“ looks like German version of a different name, not „Vėlaičiai“ etc.
d3d9 (2019-08-05 11:15:50+00:00): Du scheinst dich gerade extrem ueber das, was andere gemacht haben, aufzuregen.. Willst du dir vielleicht nochmal diesen Wald, den du bearbeitet hast, anschauen und korrigieren?
moosfrosch (2019-08-05 12:21:18+00:00): Ja, ich rege mich auf, wenn ich beim Wandern 5 km Umweg laufen muss, weil jemand die Wege als frei zugänglich eingezeichnet hat. Ja, ich ärgere mich über als Tourism=Zoo getaggte Tiergehege IN einer Haftanstalt und IN einer Psychiatrischen Klinik! Sollen da mit Elefantensymbol Ausflügler hingelockt werden?? Und jetzt erkläre mir mal bitte, was ich da nochmal "anschauen und korrigieren" soll? Ich war vor Ort, ich habe so eingezeichnet, wie es war, und wenn Du einen Fehler meinst zu erkennen, dann bitte konkret.
d3d9 (2019-08-05 12:25:35+00:00): Das Multipolygon ist nicht gueltig. Es gibt eine Selbstueberschneidung oderso am Outer way
moosfrosch (2019-08-05 13:42:28+00:00): Sorry, welches Multipolygon? Davon wimmelt es in dem Bereich. Potlatch2 sagt nichts Ungültiges. So technisch firm bin ich icht, dass ich das finde und korrigieren kann - wenn Du weißt, wo der Fehler liegt, mache es bitte, danke.
user_5359 (2019-07-25 19:47:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I add a business description to your entry. Please check (for details follow the link.
peppone84 (2020-09-02 13:45:13+00:00): Hallo, 
gerade gesehen, dass hier bei Node 6507208390 von Dir ein highway=crossing und crossing=uncontrolled (also ein Fußgängerüberweg/Zebrastreifen, oder?) eingezeichnet wurde. Kann ich den wegmachen, oder hattest Du bestimmte Gründe, den einzuzeichnen? Vor Ort (vgl. Mapillary) ist nämlich kein Fußgängerüberweg über die B12.
Grüße,
Stephan
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-09 22:50:54+00:00): These buildings https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/707413097 aren't drawn very well and overlap with the parking lot which is incorrect.
amilopowers (2019-08-17 19:21:37+00:00): Hoi Centi
Bitte schreibe nichts von Swisstopo ab, da wir dafür keine Bewilligung haben.
Falls du diesen Weg von dort genommen hast, solltest du ihn wieder aus OSM löschen.
Mehr zu den Quellen findest du hier:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Switzerland/Datasources
Besten Dank für deine Antwort.
Ueli
Centi (2019-08-21 05:06:46+00:00): Hoi Ueli

Danke für die Nachricht - hatte die Diskussion in der Mailliste gesehen und auch, dass ich in der Filterliste auftauche. 

Den Weg, welchen ich eingezeichnet habe bin ich abgelaufen und habe auch ein GPS-Track aufgezeichnet, welchen ich als Referenz genutzt habe. Entsprechend habe ich auch die Source gesetzt. 

Swisstopo habe ich nur als ‚Beweis‘ angefügt - da der Weg dort auch eingezeichnet ist - aber dies scheint somit auch gar nicht nötig zu sein, richtig?

Beste Grüsse

Christoph
amilopowers (2019-08-24 08:16:11+00:00): Hoi Christoph
Danke für deine Nachricht.
Genau das ist absolut unnötig und schafft Verwirrung.
Ist etwas auf anderen (offiziellen) Karten nicht vorhanden, ist dies doch umso schöner und ein Vorteil wenn OSM dies beinhaltet.
Liebe Grüsse
Ueli
Centi (2019-08-28 16:03:49+00:00): Hallo Ueli

Danke für die Präzisierung - werde somit solche Hinweise bei zukünftigen Änderungen zur Legitimierung weglassen.

Beste Grüsse

Christoph
PT-53 (2019-07-26 07:11:54+00:00): Hallo geo-ranger,
ist "Festung" wirklich der Eigenname des Aussichtspunktes?
Fragende Grüße
carfog81 (2019-07-29 15:45:00+00:00): Buen día, por favor tener cuidado editando las relaciones Tipo Ruta (Bus) del Megabus, estás ya están bien, de acuerdo a OSM Inspector https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/
Lo invito a usar esta herramienta y además usar JOSM que permite verificar el correcto estado de las relaciones.

Saludos
viloan (2019-07-25 19:35:30+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
WoodWoseWulf (2019-07-26 01:25:31+00:00): Howdy!

This park looks like it might just be a grassy patch out the back of some kind of farmyard/mechanical/engineering place - do you have any more information on it? Who operates it? Is it open to the public?
kartonage (2019-07-26 01:30:07+00:00): Hej smoops,

the correct way to go about it is to actually correct the POI. A removed tag does not make the data any better.

Best regards
juminet (2019-07-29 18:49:57+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue sur OSM!

Je vois que vous avez ajouté une adresse, mais en mettant le numéro du batiment dans "addr:street". Or dans addr:street, il ne faut que le nom de la rue. Vous pouvez mettre le numéro du bâtiment dans addr:housenumber. 

De même, pour ajouter un hameau comme celui-ci, place=isolated_dwelling est préféré. Le problème avec place=hameau est que cela ne sera pas reconnu par les applications et les rendus de carte utilisant OSM. 

Happy mapping!

juminet

PS: Plus d'infos sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:addr & https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:place?uselang=fr
michalfabik (2020-09-17 17:58:34+00:00): Pozdrav, zašto si magistralni put kroz Zenicu promijenio u highway=trunk?
Badojo (2020-09-17 18:22:36+00:00): Pa označen je sa plavim znakom na Mapilaryju (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=44.12929034823409&lng=17.979232010393503&z=18.718798358899097&pKey=3vuy552MXUQ9Odw4at8OYA&focus=photo&x=0.4887352540967441&y=0.32084378059649565&zoom=0) što označava brzi put ili put samo za motorna vozila koji je malo viša klasa nego obični magistralni put
michalfabik (2020-09-17 18:55:18+00:00): Da, ali upravo kao što kažeš: ovaj znak označava "brzu cestu ili cestu za saobraćaj motornih vozila"[1]. A brza cesta (highway=trunk) je cesta "koja ima dvije fizički odvojene vozne trake za promet iz suprotnih smjerova, koja ima sva raskrižja u dvjema razinama ili više razina s poprečnim cestama i drugim prometnicama (željezničkim ili tramvajskim prugama), koja u pravilu nema zaustavnih traka"[2]. S obzirom da ova cesta nema većinu od navedenog, radi se o onoj "cesti za saobraćaj motornih vozila" koja nije više klase ni u kom smislu osim što je na njoj zabranjeno kretanje nemotornih vozila. Inače svim parametrima odgovara običnom magistralnom putu. Na kraju krajeva, cesta i dalje ima broj "M-17" - tj. spada u sistem magistralnih cesta (highway=primary). Brze ceste imaju oznaku BC. Onaj znak koji spominješ je izražen tagom motorroad=yes[3]  
  
[1] http://jpcfbih.ba/assets/files/pravilnik__o_saobracajnim__znakovima_i_signalizaciji.pdf 
[2] http://jpcfbih.ba/assets/files/zakon_o_cestama_fbih_2010.pdf
[3] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorroad
Badojo (2020-09-17 19:08:52+00:00): U redu, hvala
power expert (2019-07-25 20:21:42+00:00): And clearly also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Relations_are_not_Categories