piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ivanbranco (2021-03-11 19:03:17+00:00): Ciao Leonardo,

questa way: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48656446
aveva il name giusto come da specifiche wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions

Il nome "Via IV Novembre" era già presente come alt_name=*

Ho ripristinato la situazione precedente
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
user_5359 (2021-03-09 05:35:55+00:00): Hello! Please use mix case (and no abbreviations) fro the street name. Also check that there not existing streets!
slogfester (2021-03-09 02:15:27+00:00): whoops- signpost is visible on good street view on the SOUTH side, but I have seen the sign on the NORTH side
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:22:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-11-05 14:23:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 113411678 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some personal markers in the Philippines.  An attempt to contact the mapper failed.
jonorossi (2021-03-10 04:47:22+00:00): Hi Alan, welcome to OSM and great to see more local mappers.

I've got a few comments on your changeset to help improve them:
- OSM is meant to map what is on the ground today, if a Woolies, Hungry Jacks or Metro station is under construction or only at the proposed stage, then the element should reflect that otherwise maps are going to tell people they can use them (new data gets out pretty quickly). Have a read of the construction tag and lifecycle tag prefixes on the OSM wiki. These lifecycle prefixes are there to prevent software telling people to use a bus station, nearby petrol station, etc or routing people through roads under construction, obviously until they are available, also means you don't have to suffix the name= tag with "- Under Contruction".
- building= areas should only cover the footprint of the building not the whole land. Simple example: building=house should cover the house and landuse=residential should cover all the land where people build houses, sheds, driveways, pools, gardens, etc. Same applies with your additions, see the building and landuse wiki pages for more info. If the building doesn't exist and you don't know how big it'll be, just use a single node instead of an area.
- For the Woolies Dark "Store", it obviously needs a lifecycle prefix since it doesn't exist yet, but since we'll never be able to visit it, it isn't a supermarket just a warehouse, no different from our point of view to their normal distribution centres, I'd tag it as such and probably not use the mainstream media "dark store" term.

Let me know if you've got any further questions.
AlanBurchill (2021-03-10 06:46:58+00:00): ok, noted thanks...
jonorossi (2021-03-10 04:50:47+00:00): Hi again Alan, same comments apply here as changeset 100668563 regarding lifecycle tags and building footprint.

I haven't looked at the proposed plans for this area for quite some time, but you've named this "Depot". Is this where they are parking the buses overnight and for maintenance? If so, then this isn't a public_transport=station for us public to use.

Jono
AlanBurchill (2021-03-10 07:02:06+00:00): 100% going to be a depot and not a bus stop... https://www.brisbane.qld.gov.au/traffic-and-transport/public-transport/brisbane-metro/brisbane-metro-depot
AlanBurchill (2021-03-10 07:05:52+00:00): Site has been cleared for work to begin under constructions. So an i suppose an underconstruction tag?
jonorossi (2021-03-10 07:18:35+00:00): I'd go with:
landuse=construction
construction=depot
depot=bus
depot:type=service;storage
name=Brisbane Metro Bus Depot
operator=Brisbane City Council
access=no

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dconstruction
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Ddepot

Completely up to you, but I'd usually not bother mapping proposed buildings or driveways until they start getting built. Legally you'll find the BCC construction plans are copyright, so you should really only trace aerial imagery or physically look at the site and not copy from their plans.
jonorossi (2021-03-10 04:54:16+00:00): Hi Alan,

You've accidentally moved the node for 6 Glengala Drive to Lillian Ct.

Jono
AlanBurchill (2021-03-10 06:39:10+00:00): thanks. i have fixed,.
nevw (2021-03-09 06:38:41+00:00): Hi
I reverted this edit that changed the name of the roadway Racecourse Road.
If you want to add the address to the property at 428 Racecourse Road, it would be correct to added the tags to the landuse boundary that is already mapped and I expect is at #428. 
If you use the Maxar Premium Imagery instead of the default Bing imagery you will see that you will be able to map the buildings and roadways within the complex.
As you are new to editing the OSM you may benefit by using something like https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/9/-27.49122/152.67700 or https://www.onosm.org/# to initially help adding your business in to the OSM with suitable tags, especially the correct address and contact tags. 
I don't know what the location is used for but it looks like it may be an aged care facility https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dsocial_facility
nevw (2021-03-09 06:47:38+00:00): Here is an example of a well mapped aged care facility in a well mapped town.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299850438#map=19/-30.50422/151.65845&layers=H
At the right side of the map under the layers icon you can select the 'Map Data' box and this will allow you to select individual items on the map to check the correct tag use. Keep the area small or your pc may slow or freeze.
user_5359 (2021-03-09 05:29:16+00:00): Hello! You added a bigger number of unknown tags in this change set. Please explain the source of this information and the meaning (!) of the keys.
Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914890246:
stevea (2021-03-09 05:34:51+00:00): Hello Georg.  WHAT "unknown tags?"  The tags on way/914890246 are documented on our county page, https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Santa_Cruz_County,_California
user_5359 (2021-03-09 05:39:50+00:00): Only for example the page says
SHAPESTAre with SHAPESTLen (keys)	|Keep|Change to sccgis:shapestare=* and sccgis:shapestlen=*, respectively, with the same values.

Even if it sounds a bit nasty: if you already insist on a local rule, then stick to it.
stevea (2021-03-09 05:43:31+00:00): There is an exception for SHAPE* keys.
stevea (2021-03-09 05:44:24+00:00): Haven't you got something else to do?  (Even if it sounds a bit nasty)
mueschel (2021-03-17 09:49:47+00:00): Hi,
these nodes got a tag that looks like it is a mistake: CACHE_NAME 	
Could you check and fix this?
CENTRALHUB (2021-03-17 16:29:23+00:00): Fixed. Thanks for your comment.
user_5359 (2021-03-09 05:04:23+00:00): should be "add same details"
abakus_uploader (2021-03-09 23:32:21+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
gpserror (2021-03-10 03:56:19+00:00): Looks like you and a bunch of others are doing a tag team edit on hotels and motels, thanks for the updates.  However El Palomino Motel is actually the multiple buildings around this edited position (the office is marked on the map about 25m to the north), this position is actually a dilapidated swimming pool.
defuneste (2021-03-11 11:05:34+00:00): Hello,
Je ne sais pas si c'est bon espace pour répondre mais j'ai bien noté tes remarque et en tenir compte ! merci !
marc__marc (2024-08-30 10:38:24+00:00): avec plaisir. je vois que tu as continuer à contribuer en masse, chouette !
gomap ne permet pas de mettre un commentaire dans tes derniers groupes de modification ?
sskalyan (2021-03-11 14:41:04+00:00): Hi,

Thanks for your contribution in this vicinity, please be extra cautious when you are modifying high priority roads, unintentionally you have created impossible oneway (with no inbound), one of our editor fixed it now. And I noticed you are using old version of Id editor, please update it to 2.19.6 (current version). This version will display warnings in the event of potential errors.

Thanks,
Kalyan
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100680974
ashybko_lyft (2021-03-11 16:08:17+00:00): Hi, Kalyan

My name is Anna and I’m a mapper on the OSM team at Lyft. I appreciate your map contribution and sincerely apologise for any inconvenience my edits have caused. Thank you for fixing the issue and paying attention to the obsolete version of our ID editor. We will definitely take your advice into account and make sure that it will be updated to the latest version as soon as possible.

Regards,
Anna
Supaplex (2021-03-09 07:39:47+00:00): 名稱是?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100680988
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:17:42+00:00): لماذا تم تحويل الطريق إلى تصنيف motorway ؟
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100682129
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:17:53+00:00): لماذا تم تحويل الطريق إلى تصنيف motorway ؟
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100682430
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:18:39+00:00): تصنيف الطريق الصحيح secondary نرجوا عدم القيام بتعديله مالم تكن عارفاً بما تفعل
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100682603
abakus_uploader (2021-03-09 23:32:22+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2021-08-07 14:23:23+00:00): Dag Eco.. leisure=park heb ik omgezet naar garden.
mvg
eggie
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:19:48+00:00): تصنيف الطريق الصحيح هو secondary نرجوا عدم العبث وتغييره إلى motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100683993
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:20:20+00:00): تصنيف الطريق كـmotorway أمر غير صحيح
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100684218
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:20:30+00:00): تصنيف الطريق كـmotorway أمر غير صحيح
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100684713
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:20:39+00:00): تصنيف الطريق كـmotorway أمر غير صحيح
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100684975
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:41:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:20:46+00:00): تصنيف الطريق كـmotorway أمر غير صحيح
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100685324
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:20:55+00:00): تصنيف الطريق كـmotorway أمر غير صحيح
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100685481
tobji (2021-03-09 07:23:52+00:00): The footpath extending from the west entrance causes "crossing highways" warnings.
portalaventura (2021-05-14 17:00:16+00:00): Olá. Peço que você e seus colegas da Apple não efetuem "alinhamentos" de vias.

De fato, vocês estão desalinhando vias que já estavam alinhadas. As vias na cidade de Santa Maria já estão alinhadas, em geral. Se você encontrou algo que parece errado, entre em contato com a comunidade local. Essa é a postura correta.

A forma que você e seus colegas da Apple estão agindo está provocando retrabalho e, de fato, está bagunçando os dados que já estavam alinhados.
TeaHorseRoad (2021-05-15 00:29:05+00:00): Olá, portalaventura. Obrigado pela mensagem. Quando fiz os alinhamentos nesta zona leste de Santa Maria, escolhi uma imagem que achei que estava mais bem alinhada com os traços de GPS da Strava. Existem áreas específicas que eu poderia ajudar a atualizar com uma imagem preferida que você usa? Obrigado pelas observações.

Hello portalaventura. Thank you for the message. When I made the alignments in this eastern area of Santa Maria, I chose an imagery I thought was better aligned to the Strava GPS Traces. Are there any specific areas that I could help update with a preferred imagery that you use? Thanks for the feedback.
portalaventura (2021-05-20 12:26:06+00:00): A imagem utilizada não é tão importante. Até porque os dados não precisam estar alinhados com nenhuma das imagens disponíveis para estarem corretos, uma vez que as imagens podem conter distorções.

O problema ocorre com o alinhamento de vias sem alinhar as demais geometrias disponíveis nos dados e que representam construções, tais como, casas, prédios, etc. 

Assim, as vias ficam desalinhadas em relação as demais geometrias, ocasionando situações onde as vias estão muito próximas de construções. E essas situações não correspondem com a realidade.

Ou seja, não é suficiente 'alinhar' apenas as vias, pois isso prejudica o alinhamento relativo entre todas as geometrias contidas na região. Alinhamentos devem ser feitos levando em conta todas as geometrias disponíveis.
TeaHorseRoad (2021-05-20 22:11:41+00:00): Olá de novo, portalaventura. Obrigado por essas informações e sugestões. Concordo que alguns dos edifícios poderiam ser melhor alinhados. Alinharei todos os dados a esta área para obter estradas e edifícios em perfeita sincronia. Obrigado novamente por seu conselho aqui. 

Hello again portalaventura. Thank you for that information and suggestions. I agree that some of the buildings could be aligned better. I will align all data to this area to get roads and buildings in perfect sync. Thanks again for your advice here.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:21:09+00:00): تصنيف الطريق كسكني أمر غير صحيح
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100686036
eggie (2021-03-09 07:32:45+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
olo81 (2021-03-27 13:25:07+00:00): nakładające się obszary do poprawy
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/840591366
C2oc4 (2021-03-28 06:01:45+00:00): już?
eggie (2021-03-09 07:35:41+00:00): Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100686595

Wanneer je met een knoop gaat schuiven ziit daar soms wel wat aan vast.
Begin voorzichtig
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-09 07:37:31+00:00): Je hebt de hele boomgaard meegenomen.
eggie (2021-03-09 07:53:16+00:00): Schade hersteld  acecss=no verwijderd van pad
GvdW7 (2021-03-09 08:05:33+00:00): ik weet niet hoe ik dit kan herstellen, sorry zal voorzichtiger zijn
eggie (2021-03-09 08:13:12+00:00): Ahh.. Dat heb ik al gedaan. Dat bos verwijderd aan de Molenkampstraat.
De boomgaard aangepast en hersteld.
Er wordt je niets kwalijk genomen..
OSM kent wel een erg steile leercurve.
Mapse
eggie
user_5359 (2021-03-09 15:53:37+00:00): Hello! I repair your try for a building with place (like a garden) inside the building. Please see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12421513.
eggie (2021-03-09 07:49:26+00:00): Elk begin is moeilijk.
Ook dit pad is Verboden toegang.. access=no  Is dat allemaal echt zo?
Dat zal toch niet.
gr eggie
eggie (2021-03-09 07:47:57+00:00): access=no betekent Verboden Toegang. Mag hier niemand komen?
eggie (2021-03-09 07:47:03+00:00): Tip.. Begin nooit met access=no

Het pad staat nu op slot met Verboden Toegang.
Staat hier zo'n bord?
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=100687472
access=no is bijna altijd fout.

mvg
eggie
eggie (2021-03-09 07:45:41+00:00): Graag bijtaggen op de adresnode.
Niet zelf adressen aanmaken. De poi ligt buiten het gebouw.
mvg
eggie
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:21:50+00:00): تصنيف الطريق الصحيح هو primary وليس motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100687703
eggie (2021-03-09 07:44:49+00:00): Probeer als het even kan bij te taggen op de adresnode
mvg
eggie
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:22:13+00:00): تصنيف الطريق الصحيح هو primary وليس motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100687977
corfede (2021-03-10 08:51:13+00:00): Hi, the phone number wasn't in the international format, but was the correct one. The name also did not need to be changed. I fixed it. Regards, Federico.
Sonnenschauer (2021-03-10 09:00:40+00:00): Ok, thanks for the correction!
eggie (2021-03-09 07:50:55+00:00): Een brandgang.. 

Wellicht access=private, maar geen access=no

Kijk nog even..
eggie
Pfaca (2021-03-09 08:08:57+00:00): Number 7A, not 74.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:22:22+00:00): تصنيف الطريق الصحيح هو primary وليس motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100688344
mueschel (2021-03-16 15:15:52+00:00): Yet another reminder:
Please stop importing these offices. You're using a huge amount of misspelled keys which can't be used by any application.

Please read the import guidelines and follow the advice given there:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:22:29+00:00): تصنيف الطريق الصحيح هو primary وليس motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100688430
Warin61 (2021-03-10 23:02:27+00:00): area=yes is not required on most things.
eggie (2021-03-09 07:57:56+00:00): Straatnaam name='Speeltuin de Vergd'  zal niet bestaan. access=no betekent Verboden toegang. 
Kijk nog eens even en loop je edits even af. Probeer wat met de feedback te doen.
MVG
eggie
GvdW7 (2021-03-09 08:03:09+00:00): verwerkt, bedankt, ben het nog aan het uitvogelen
eggie (2021-03-09 08:06:24+00:00): Oke .. laat je niet weerhouden door wat kritiek. Vooral veel plezier met mappen.
Gr eggie
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:22:36+00:00): تصنيف الطريق الصحيح هو primary وليس motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100688555
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:22:44+00:00): تصنيف الطريق الصحيح هو primary وليس motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100688783
Timmy_Tesseract (2021-04-20 17:29:07+00:00): Hello Cabinet23. Thank you for your contributions to OSM. When you find things to be in the wrong location please just move them instead of deleting and creating a new object. I've restored the old nodes for Barangays 87 and 90 (see changeset 103285918) as they had many other tags in addition to just name and place. This also preserves the past edit history. By the way, the correct place tag for barangays is village or quarter. Town is meant for municipalities. For more details you could check the OSM wiki. Keep up the good work!
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:34:38+00:00): هذا الطريق لا يصح أن يكون motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100688960
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:34:31+00:00): هذا الطريق لا يصح أن يكون motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100689012
Blaine Colwell (2021-03-09 08:03:09+00:00): This may be unnecessary, but I personally felt that it better represents how the road is driven
eggie (2021-03-09 08:08:14+00:00): Oke...  
Editor iD heeft vaak vreemde fratsen.
De regel access=yes  mag helemaal weg.
Ook dat geeft soms problemen. 
gr eggie
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:34:22+00:00): هذا الطريق لا يصح أن يكون motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100689144
Blaine Colwell (2021-03-09 08:04:00+00:00): Upon review, there may be two buildings here, with one being reasonably difficult to see on some satellite images
Dodko (2021-11-02 08:31:04+00:00): Tá studnička https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8499141262 čo ste pridali 9.3.2021 je tá čo bola poznámka z 9.9.2020? Ak je to ona môžete poznámku uzavrieť.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2340870
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:34:14+00:00): هذا الطريق لا يصح أن يكون motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100689454
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:34:06+00:00): هذا الطريق لا يصح أن يكون motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100689604
Szabi Nyikó (2021-03-10 11:20:32+00:00): Halihó!
Ugyan a képeken nem látszik, van esetleg épület is itt, amit hozzá tudsz adni a térképhez?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100689801
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:33:49+00:00): هذا الطريق لا يصح أن يكون motorway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100689883
Tomas Straupis (2021-03-09 09:56:48+00:00): Hello. Ways cannot hang out like this one: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/914948934 ALL ways must be connected to another ways (to road network), otherwise this segment is unreachable/unroutable.
Bolt003 (2021-03-09 11:36:13+00:00): Hello,  thank you for the feedback. Corrected it. Regards,
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-03-10 03:33:29+00:00): هذا الطريق لا يصح أن يكون trunk
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/100690353