piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2018-07-20 15:47:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:50:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:42:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:21:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:29:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:53:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:27:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:31:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60914791 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:38:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:44:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:59:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:20:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:28:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 14:00:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:36:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:22:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
praeteritum (2022-08-07 00:32:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124581009.
praeteritum (2022-08-07 00:28:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124580988.
praeteritum (2022-08-06 14:03:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124563536.
mavl (2018-12-24 23:59:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:41:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:43:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
mavl (2018-12-25 00:01:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
praeteritum (2022-08-06 13:51:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124563116.
praeteritum (2022-08-06 13:44:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124562667.
Arma IRM-ED (2021-07-02 12:39:08+00:00): Hi, Daniel Mateo
Hope you are doing great

I found your edit (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/598378567) needs more improvement because it's crossing the waterbody. Please have a look. I think it's a barrier, not a highway. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:barrier)

Thank you and happy mapping!
viloan (2018-06-16 17:17:35+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
tux67 (2018-06-17 11:09:29+00:00): Hallo Alces13,
das Gebäude hatte bereits eine Hausnummer (auf einen Node im Gebäudeumriss gemappt - wie alle Häuser in der Gegend). Die nun redundante Information wird wieder gelöscht. Solltest du die Adresse nicht in maps.me sehen, würde ich dich bitten vor deinen Änderungen die ensprechende Stelle direkt auf Openstreetmap anzusehen. maps.me ist bekannt dafür nicht ganz die richtige Sicht auf OSM-Daten zu liefern. 
Darüber zu mappen führt oft zu Inkonsistenzen.

Gruß
Stephan (tux67)
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59898740
eggie (2018-06-16 20:35:51+00:00): Die stoep hoef je niet te mappen als hij als trottoir direct langs de hoofdrijbaan ligt. de brug is te lang. Je zult dus het pad op twee plaatsen moeten splitsen op een node. En aan weerszijde de tag bridge=yes moeten weghalen.
Evt. kun je nog een surface= ?  tag toevoegen. wood? concrete? paved?
Lumensum (2018-06-17 06:12:07+00:00): Ik heb de brug gesplitst in een stuk voetpad, dan een brug (type=wooden toegevoegd) en dan weer een stuk voetpad.

Het is een rijbaan met daarnaast een breed voetpad waar weer drie rijen bomen staan. Ik heb een foto gemaakt ter illustratie: https://i.gyazo.com/3c9b899c87882c185ffb7694dd757184.jpg
eggie (2018-06-17 08:15:05+00:00): Gesplitst is beter.
Dat pad zou je wel apart kunnen mappen en dan zet je de bomenrijen als  natural=tree_row  ertussen. 
.. of losse bomen natural=tree
Zou dan wel een verbinding maken van de brug met de hoofdrijbaan voor een juiste routering.
highway=footway of path  .. ligt eraan of er een bord wandelpad staat (dan altijd footway) . Ook even checken of je met de fiets over de brug mag.
BCNorwich (2018-06-16 18:31:22+00:00): Hi and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Nice first try at editing the OSM database. 
Important statement, we must not copy from Google.
Fortunately the bridge shows on Digital Globe standard imagery so we've taken that as an acceptable source.
I've joined the steps up, removed the level crossing, made good the Hertfordshire Way route relation. 
Please have a look and see if it's OK.
Regards Bernard
martinherts_uk (2018-06-17 19:09:12+00:00): This looks great, many thanks for your assistance!  (and really prompt response!)
GOwin (2018-06-19 04:37:33+00:00): Hello @abbytheexplorer. I'm glad to see your active participation in OpenStreetMap. Thank you for your edits.

I recently noticed a lot of of editing activities in this area, and the hashtag #prcvcad. Do you mind telling us more about this project, and the editors involved? Feel free to do so in the local mailing list, to give fellow OSM contributors a heads-up about what's going on here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/

Also, in line with improving transparency, and project accountability for directed editing projects, could you kindly add a wiki page about your project?

At the minimum, we hope to see details documenting your mapping project and its goals, list of project leaders and coordinators, and their respective OpeStreetMap iD and contact information, and the usernames of your mapping team.

We are also keen to know what your data validation plans are, and the usernames of your validators.

Kind regards,
@GOwin
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59898863
pitscheplatsch (2018-06-16 20:15:53+00:00): #test #failed
praeteritum (2022-08-05 05:47:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124505245.
praeteritum (2022-08-05 05:35:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124505201.
praeteritum (2022-08-04 05:58:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124462534.
praeteritum (2022-08-05 05:33:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124505077.
eggie (2018-06-16 19:59:34+00:00): Karel.. De man_made =bridge loopt niet t/m de oever. Is dat de bedoeling?
eggie (2018-06-16 20:00:32+00:00): Ook staat er hand_made =bridge
karelgrt (2018-06-16 20:12:09+00:00): Zou nu goed moeten zijn.
eggie (2018-06-16 20:26:31+00:00): Aan de oostkant moet je nog naar de kant springen over het water.
eggie (2018-06-16 20:27:31+00:00): Gebruik je de BGT omtrekgericht als transparant?
gallseife (2018-11-11 21:41:18+00:00): Halloe Sebik99, das von dir nach veralteten Luftbildern eingezeichnete Gleis existiert nicht mehr.
Bitte korrigiere das wieder.
GOwin (2018-06-19 04:37:52+00:00): Hello @Dexter the Wanderer. I'm glad to see your active participation in OpenStreetMap. Thank you for your edits.

I recently noticed a lot of of editing activities in this area, and the hashtag #prcvcad. Do you mind telling us more about this project, and the editors involved? Feel free to do so in the local mailing list, to give fellow OSM contributors a heads-up about what's going on here: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/

Also, in line with improving transparency, and project accountability for directed editing projects, could you kindly add a wiki page about your project?

At the minimum, we hope to see details documenting your mapping project and its goals, list of project leaders and coordinators, and their respective OpeStreetMap iD and contact information, and the usernames of your mapping team.

We are also keen to know what your data validation plans are, and the usernames of your validators.

Kind regards,
@GOwin
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/59899686
praeteritum (2022-08-04 05:53:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124462526.
praeteritum (2022-08-05 05:30:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124505061.
aixbrick (2018-06-16 19:55:33+00:00): Hi,
it's not necessary to delete the existing structures before recreating them with minor improvements. You can change the existing ones and so preserve their history.
Regards
wombatmaper (2018-06-18 01:08:59+00:00): ok thanks!
eggie (2018-06-16 20:11:11+00:00): Bruggetje naar de Oostdam klopt wel. mag je er fietsen? Zal wellicht niet de bedoeling zijn... . dan vehicle=no taggen. 
Evt. ook de surface=? taggen. 

ik mis de fietsoversteek naar de Utrechtse Straatweg. Fietsers zijn daar uitgezonderd van eenrichting. 
Op de Utrechtse straatweg hoort oneway:bicycle=no  en als het ook voor brommers geld. oneway:moped=no
Hjart (2018-06-16 18:25:06+00:00): Faunabroen var i forvejen markeret
praeteritum (2022-08-03 06:15:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124419007.
maraf24 (2018-06-21 16:53:40+00:00): Proszę o pisanie merytorycznych komentarzy do zestawów zmian.
Polarbear (2018-08-20 19:48:20+00:00): Please do not add fictive objects to the map!
Please only edit places you know!
(reverted by the community in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61812852 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60005770)
VlIvYur (2018-06-17 19:58:37+00:00): Hello
I think there must be two POI of Walgreens: chemist and pharmacy. And third one for Citibank's atm.
jmapb (2018-06-18 17:11:38+00:00): Hi, thanks... pharmacy=yes makes sense to me in the same way as adding bar=yes to a restaurant or bench=yes to a bus stop. Physically, the pharmacy counter is part of the same shop: same address, same phone number, and also serves as an additional checkout area for items from the main shop. It looks and feels like part of the shop, not a separate business operating from the same premises.

I saw pharmacy=yes suggested as a combination with shop=chemist in the talk page for pharmacy on the wiki. Browsing through taginfo, it looks like it's much more common to add amenity=pharmacy to the chemist object, rather than pharmacy=yes, so I've made this change (changeset 59951758.)

That said, if this Duane Reade looks and feels to you like two separate features, feel free to map it as such -- I won't take offense. (This approach does have some advantages, like simpler encoding of the opening_hours.) And if there's an existing consensus about mapping this style of shop/pharmacy that's been discussed and documented, please point me in that direction. I read through the wiki, the July 2016 thread on the tagging mailing list, and some related issues on the iD github page, and there's no authoritative consensus that I can see. But there are over 200 Duane Reade stores in the NYC area (and, including other brands, many thousands more in the USA) with essentially the same design, so it would be great to have them tagged in a consistent way.

(As for the ATM, tagging shops and amenities with atm=yes is a well-established practice.)
Polarbear (2018-08-20 19:48:24+00:00): Please do not add fictive objects to the map!
Please only edit places you know!
(reverted by the community in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/61812852 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60005770)
praeteritum (2022-08-03 06:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124418382.
John-O (2018-06-17 11:13:55+00:00): Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap. I'm just wondering whether this nursery should be tagged as `amenity=kindergarten` rather than school.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=kindergarten
Kurisu112 (2018-06-17 22:12:12+00:00): Hi John,
Nursery is very similar to a Kindergarten.
Nursery is just the English (UK) word. 

So I suppose it could sit under Kindergarten.
SK53 (2018-06-18 13:22:01+00:00): Hi Kurusu112, yes you have two options: the most usual one is amenity=kindergarten (I sometimes I add kindergarten=day_nursery to separate ones which are primarily looking after kids from those doing some kind of teaching like a Montessori School). A alternative is amenity=childcare  with childcare=day_nursery, but this is much less used and I'm not sure if it shows on the map.

You can also add min_age and max_age to show the range ages of children tha are catered for.

Regards,

SK53
praeteritum (2022-08-03 05:49:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124417992.
Stereo (2018-06-17 18:21:37+00:00): Hi, welcome to Luxembourg! I’m wondering where you’re finding those track refs, since you’re not indicating a source. Happy mapping :)
Daham (2018-06-18 16:28:56+00:00): Thanks for the warm welcome in Lux. And: sorry for missing the source "survey". You can find those informations on small plates fixed next to the catenary.
mavl (2018-07-20 15:41:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:25:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:45:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:51:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:39:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:50:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:39:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
praeteritum (2022-08-03 05:35:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124417803.
mavl (2018-07-20 15:40:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:38:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:43:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:32:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:41:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:49:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:49:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:40:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 18:39:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60915879 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].