piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jmapb (2020-03-05 19:20:09+00:00): Hi RangerMankin, welcome to OSM! I'm Brooklyn-based myself and it's always great to see a new mapper in the hood.

In this changeset you've made slight adjustments to a lot of building footprints. My advice is to do this with caution. The footprints were all imported from the NYC dept of buildings database and though they're not perfect, they are in general pretty good. If you see a lot of imported buildings that are slightly offset from the aerial imagery in the same direction, it's much more likely that the imagery you're using is misaligned, rather than that the city mismeasured all of those buildings.

The best-aligned aerial imagery in the NYC area is the "NYS Orthos Online" which is published by New York State. If you switch to this layer you'll probably see that most of the building footprints match the aerial photos pretty well. (Note that the footprints sometimes don't include overhangs and awnings.)

The ESRI World Imagery layer is also useful -- it's actually the same imagery as the NYS Orthos with better resolution. But the alignment is a little off, and even varies a bit between zoom levels.

The most up-to-date imagery currently is the MapBox Satellite, but it's misaligned pretty severely. It's also taken at an angle so the tops of buildings are displaced from the footprints, especially taller ones.

Let me know if you have any questions about the map, happy to help.

Jason
RangerMankin (2020-03-06 15:44:24+00:00): Thank you very much for the clarification. I started noticing after making adjustments that they were ALL “off” and started to get suspicious. I started researching and realized I must be missing something. I will definite use the resources you mentioned and really appreciate you taking the time to let me know.
jmapb (2020-03-07 03:20:53+00:00): Thanks, and if you don't mind, I'd like to move some of the items back to thier original location. It's not hard to do as long as nobody else has moved them around in the mean time.

Regarding the aerial imagery, it looks like my info's out of date. Earlier this year I checked the Bing imagery and it was several years old, but it's recently been updated and seems to be from last summer. So Bing is now the most current in NYC. The alignment's not great but I've realigned it using an offset of 0.86,-1.38 and that seems to work pretty well, at least in Brooklyn. Unknown at this point if it drifts around in other parts of the city.

(The NYS Orthos is still valuable because the alignment's close to perfect -- close enough that I don't bother trying to tweak it -- and because it was shot in the winter so has much less tree cover. The Mapbox imagery's still useful too, especially for seeing details on taller buildings.)
RangerMankin (2020-03-07 04:27:29+00:00): No problem at all. And I’ll definitely hit you up if I have more questions. I’m mainly looking to build out my local neighborhood and the various parking lots around town to help Teslas with Autosummon. This is a great project and happy to have discovered it.
eggie (2020-03-05 15:54:00+00:00): Stijn ... bedenk dat al je toevoegingen daadwerkelijk op de wereldkaart komen en door iedereen wordt gezien.
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-05 16:08:04+00:00): reverted door Wijzigingenset #81830270
maraf24 (2020-03-11 19:29:29+00:00): Biura nie powinno być oznaczone jako remizy.
arturp (2020-03-16 08:05:58+00:00): Którą jednostkę oznaczyłem w miejscu biur? Znasz może właściwą lokalizację remizy tej jednostki?
maraf24 (2020-03-16 10:31:54+00:00): We Wrocławiu na Grunwaldzkiej. Podany adres to mieszkanie w starej kamienicy.
arturp (2020-03-16 10:33:21+00:00): A wiesz może gdzie ta jednostka ma "remizę", punkt wyjazdowy?
maraf24 (2020-03-16 10:47:08+00:00): Nie wiem, wcześniej nawet o niej nie słyszałem. Sprawdzę przy okazji, czy tam na budynku jest jakaś informacja o niej.
Discostu36 (2020-03-10 11:59:46+00:00): The amenity=kindergarten is already present in the surrounding area. But the name was at the building. I have fixed that.
marc__marc (2020-04-09 22:53:31+00:00): Hello,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778589763
I'ts source (without the S) and survey:date (with a : and not a _)
Regards,
Marc
Blueberry (2020-03-07 16:25:39+00:00): Bonjour,

Je ne comprends pas le point "Pharmacie de l'Epte". C'est un resto ou une pharmacie ? Au milieu du cimetière ?

Eric [Blueberry]
gendy54 (2020-10-25 15:30:36+00:00): Laisse tomber,

C'est un wesh wesh qui veut faire son malin. Je vais annuler le changeset.

Donat
eggie (2020-03-05 16:00:06+00:00): Wat betekent beter gemaakt. probeer concreet je edits te beschrijven  Het lijkt me beter je bijdragen nu terug te draaien. Lees je eerst goed in (zie welkomstmail)  Dan weet je wat we van startende mappers verwachten.
Gebouwen "mogen" niet zomaar aangepast worden. 
Eggie
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-05 16:02:53+00:00): Je hebt source=BAG verwijderd. Wellicht weet je niet wat dat inhoudt. 
(Kadasterinfo) Verwijder geen zaken die je niet direct begrijpt.
Een gebouw krijgt geen adres. Er zijn al adresnodes.
eggie (2020-03-05 16:07:16+00:00): Je edits zijn verwijderd.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Binnen OSM zijn afspraken hoe zaken worden toegevoegd. Lees je eerst in. OSM is niet een soort testomgeving om zaken uit te proberen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-05 16:07:43+00:00): reverteed door Wijzigingenset #81830270
eggie (2020-03-05 16:47:25+00:00): Rudy,
Lijkt mij correct zo. 
gr eggie
user_5359 (2020-03-05 16:52:48+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
user_5359 (2020-03-05 19:41:36+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice this is a production database not a playground or testing database. I revert your entry. If this is a misunderstanding, you can answer with your arguments here.
KanaLee (2021-04-06 22:28:28+00:00): Hola Luchito Chagra,

He reseteo la etiqueta name de barrio con su nombre original, La Carolina.

Si esto es incorrecto, no dude en comunicarse.

Gracias,
Kana Lee
Equipo de Microsoft Open Maps

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/102434775
mueschel (2020-03-07 19:19:55+00:00): Hi,
you added 14 nodes with strange tags like this one:
http://osm.org/node/7266916373

Could you check & fix this?
Thanks!
user_5359 (2021-03-13 20:09:50+00:00): I revert this change set because no reaction.
abrensch (2020-03-06 18:11:11+00:00): Hallo Ratrun,

was hast Du denn hier gefixt?

Das ist hier alles komplett kaputt, die ganzen Nebenstrassen sind nicht angeschlossen, und die Tiroler Strasse hat auch noch mindestens einen unverbunden Node...

Gruss, Arndt
ratrun (2020-03-06 19:09:36+00:00): Ich hatte nur die Tirolerstraße verbunden, die aufgetrennt war. Die unverbundenen Nebenstrassen sind mir dabei nicht aufgefallen. Ich habe dafür soeben ein paar weitere Fixes hochgeladen.
PT-53 (2020-03-10 08:01:21+00:00): Hallo Ottmar,
in keep right wird für diesen Knoten
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/315589471/history
ein Hinweis "fehlende Tags, Punkt 315589471" angezeigt:
https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=94&error=117813854
Wäre da nicht 
craft=builder
das passende fehlende Merkmal?
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:craft
Grüße
OF-1 (2020-03-10 11:32:41+00:00): Hallo Peter,
habe den Fehler behoben.
Grüße
Ottmar
Diógenes de Sinope (2020-03-19 16:36:54+00:00): Olá Charles Mussaka, bem-vindo ao OpenStreetMap, distorceste as vias neste conjunto de mudanças, que eu tomei a liberdade de corrigir, por favor tenha mais cuidado no futuro
Hjart (2020-03-06 09:40:50+00:00): What makes castle "incorrect"? The building is a castle.
vmicho (2020-03-06 10:19:15+00:00): a castle should be marked with building=yes + historic=castle. Otherwise it will not show as castle on the map. building=castle (previous state) doesn't exist
vmicho (2020-03-06 10:19:50+00:00): PS: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dcastle
Hjart (2020-03-06 10:22:57+00:00): It would have been enough to just add historic=castle. building=castle was never incorrect
vmicho (2020-03-06 10:39:57+00:00): Well technically you can write anything in the tag. It's just building=castle is not even in the menu list to choose from. And in wiki they say """building=castle for each individual building - (not documented yet)""" it is just for individual buildings, but nothing explained.
Hjart (2020-03-06 10:46:49+00:00): It may not be in iD's menu list. That doesn't make it incorrect though. Not being documented in the wiki doesn't necessarily make it incorrect either. Taginfo counts ~1760 examples in the OSM database: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=building%3Dcastle
vmicho (2020-03-06 12:35:18+00:00): Well then wiki needs some cleanup first, otherwise everybody will do what he wants. Currently from wiki, it is to be understood that you should create a building (i.e. building=yes) then add historic=castle tag. Even in discussion you can see that the usage of building=castle is "to be discussed". Also tagging both building=castle + historic=castle looks weird, like a double tag.
Hjart (2020-03-06 14:45:29+00:00): Lots of stuff in the wiki needs to be cleaned up. Nothing new there.
I agree that having both building=castle and historic=castle can appear confusing. Often it would make sense to have historic=castle on an area encompassing more than one building though. That's where it starts making more sense to use building=castle.
Shaun das Schaf (2020-03-06 13:36:52+00:00): Hi arno_nühm,

according to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgreenhouse_horticulture you should tag the greenhouses ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778616275 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184709483 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184709498 ) with building=greenhouse instead of landuse=greenhouse_horticulture, which is used for big areas with a lot of greenhouses.

Best regards,
Shaun das Schaf
arno_nühm (2020-03-06 17:48:22+00:00): @Shaun das Schaf Thanks :D
Verdy_p (2020-04-02 14:51:31+00:00): il n'y avait PAS de nouveau pont dans ce qui était là, et je me suis appuyé pour la géométrie sur l'imagerie la plus récente (pas l'ancienne) dans la zone qui n'est déjà plus en travaux.
Il y a peut-être un nouveau pont supplémentaire (côte ouest peut-être pour la rue André Bardon) mais il n'était PAS encore tracé; en attendant il y a toujours la passerelle parallèle mais séparée du pont de l'Avenue Florian. Si la passerelle n'est plus là elle doit faire partie du BUS et sans doute plus de la rue Bardon plus à l'ouest sur son propre nouveau pont.
La topologie de toute façon ne fonctionnait pas.
Olivier SAINT-VENANT (2020-04-02 16:09:14+00:00): Bonjour, 
Vous trouverez sur le site officiel la nouvelle configuration.
https://www.boulevard-urbain-sud.fr/

Un nouveau pont est bien mis en place, et les passerelles doivent être démolies pour la création d’un second pont à venir.
La demande de vérification était surtout pour vérifier les données entrées sur les divers tronçons de voies (ligne de bus…)
Cordialement
Olivier
PS: accessoirement, je fais partie de l'équipe Travaux du BUS...
SomeoneElse (2020-03-09 19:14:17+00:00): Thanks for fixing!
aweech (2020-03-06 15:57:39+00:00): Hi, you deleted this street and Hurley Street nearby, claiming that they do not exist. They very clearly do exist in the imagery and on public documents. I went ahead and reverted these changes. I'll change Hurley Street to a driveway though since there's only one building on it.
Nakaner (2020-05-23 16:25:31+00:00): Hallo,

bitte verwende in Rheinland-Pfalz die Luftbilder des ESRI-Layers, nicht die von Bing. Die ESRI-Bilder sind in Rheinland-Pfalz vom Landesamt für Vermessung und Geobasisinformation. Sie sind deutlich schärfer und – noch wichtiger – lagerichtiger als die Bing-Bilder. Die Bing-Bilder haben üblicherweise einen Fehler von mehreren Metern, d.h. du zeichnest all die Häuser an die falsche Stelle. Im iD-Editor kannst du über das Ebenensymbol am rechten Rand die Hintergrundbilder wechseln.

Viele Grüße

Michael
ZeLonewolf (2021-01-10 23:19:46+00:00): Hi - this reservoir, you have it tagged as an evaporation reservoir, but from the imagery it looks more like an infiltration basin.  Can you confirm?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:basin%3Dinfiltration
shuui (2021-01-11 02:57:16+00:00): Looks like you're right. I'll update it real quick. Thanks for the pointer!
McLeod71 (2020-03-05 23:30:09+00:00): Entendido error. Gracias por corrección.
user_5359 (2020-03-05 19:33:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/61878608/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I remove the point to the original position.
h_i_ (2020-03-05 19:33:57+00:00): Danke, da war ich wohl etwas unaufmerksam, beim Hinzufügen.
Владимир К (2020-06-05 02:47:17+00:00): Приветствую!
Заметил, что отрисовали дома, которых на подложке Maxar уже нет. например, вот этот https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778626832
используйте Maxar, он новее.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-09 02:22:43+00:00): intermittent lake restored/refined
DWG Ticket#2020022910000011
aharvey (2020-03-06 07:16:56+00:00): Hi I noticed you extended this road from Weeney Street. Better to create a new way unless you know it has the same name. In this case I checked the name on the NSW LPI Basemap and changed it based on that as I suspect you haven't surveyed the road name but rather just extended the existing one.
aharvey (2020-03-06 07:04:05+00:00): hi you need to add nodes when the road intersects another highway for routing. I've fixed this for you.
highflyer74 (2021-01-31 21:02:20+00:00): Kannst Du hier mal gucken, was der aktuelle Stand ist? Du hattest die Bäckerei mit disused:yes getaggt und es nicht wieder entfernt, als Du die neue Bäckerei eingetragen hast. Ist das evtl. vergessen worden?
juhbi (2021-02-04 15:45:45+00:00): Ja, hatte ich wohl übersehen - danke für den Hinweis!
Fadlilaa IRM-RV (2023-01-13 12:35:40+00:00): Hello, Leoaye. Hope you doing well.
I'm doing remote mapping to validate railway network, currently.
I found an issue on the railway. From this page https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/40294520 it shown that you added tag ford=yes and it made some warning. Cause as far as I know, ford=yes is used for part of highway where waterway runs over it. Is this railway flooded with water? Do you have any suggestion or local knowledge about this area to help me fix this issue? Please let me know if you have.
Happy Mapping 😊
nylon_overboard (2020-03-05 19:08:41+00:00): I misread the wiki, and shouldn’t have removed that it used to be a bookmaker.
Chris Fleming (2020-03-06 09:59:34+00:00): Cheers - I see that you corrected for the old use. This is normal convention and sometimes makes it easier when updating in the future. But not really a problem if that information is removed. 

I see that this isn't quite you're first edit, but welcome to OpenStreetMap and let me know if you have any questions.

Cheers
Chris
tux67 (2020-03-06 07:33:10+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur - nicht sicher was ich an dem Tag gefrühstückt hatte. Das hab' ich ausnahmsweise mit iD gemacht .. vielleicht lag's daran?
Gruß
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81835688
mariotomo (2020-03-05 22:29:27+00:00): hola.  intenta describir el cambio, más que tus motivaciones.  esto sirve en el caso de errores, o de dudas: si mapeas algo que no está en fotos aéreas, si estás basándote en una visita el lugar, si enfocaste en mapear casas, o calles, o cambiar algún detalle en particular.  esos son los comentarios más útiles.
user_5359 (2020-03-05 20:52:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Roads to parking areas are also marked as service roads (usually with the suffix service=parking_aisle). These roads have been added by the colleagues from Amazon Logistk, so the delivery will be done via these roads. I see no reason to simply delete these access roads. If you want to prevent the general use of these roads, please add appropriate access restrictions.
Please restore the old status!
mattcaci (2020-03-05 21:04:27+00:00): But these are not access roads.  It is simply the parking lot.  Even one of the "entrances" is blocked with a fence.  I work at this location and I know that these are not roads. Amazon may have added them, but they are incorrect.
Mazda05 (2020-03-05 20:57:11+00:00): вы уверены в исправлении layer https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10762423? если за последнее время не изменена конфигурация, то участки были корректно размечены...
Ars-UA (2020-03-06 06:58:45+00:00): Поправил.
GinaroZ (2020-05-20 00:38:20+00:00): What did you change this to a communications_tower? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2512753621/history
artem95vlasovets (2020-03-09 13:47:24+00:00): Hello. You added many roads with the same name. It is incorrect use of the name tag. Please fix it and use note or tag fixme if you are not sure about your actions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/81837533
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-09 02:13:36+00:00): Mechanically fusing house numbers into building outlines is not desirable.
katpatuka (2020-12-24 18:02:23+00:00): Thanks for editing in 柘荣县 ;)

I don't know mapwith.ai indicating the use of "Artifical Intelligence" but you've used RapiD 1.0.7 to tag all ways as "residential" (usually convenient inside residential areas like villages or towns). - this is unfortunately not very suitable because I also see ways which I would tag as track, unclassified or tertiary.

I recommend reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Key:highway for guidelines how to tag highways ;)
AndersAndersson (2023-01-20 20:50:57+00:00): Hej!
Detta ser inte ut som en cykelväg. Har något gått fel vid importen?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175126899
Plus omkringliggande sträckor.
NKA (2023-01-26 12:03:56+00:00): Denne veien er tidligere E16 før tunnelen ved siden av ble bygget. Etter omlegging til tunnel ble veien omregulert til sykkelvei, og den står som sykkelvei i NVDB. Veien er sperret med bom litt nede i dalen, men er tillatt brukt for de som bor her.

Jeg er enig i at veien ikke ser ut som en vanlig sykkelvei. Særlig første strekning i nord er nok i bruk som vanlig vei for sideveien mot vest/nord. Jeg er usikker på om den er skiltet som sykkelvei, men klarer ikke å se dette uten å være på stedet.
AndersAndersson (2023-01-26 19:28:10+00:00): Tittar man på flygfoton (och även Google maps (som självklart inte får användas som källa)) så syns det att cykelväg är helt fel. Bland annat är det en refug där vägen går ut mot E16. Detta behöver undersökas och rapporteras som ett fel till NVDB om datan kommer därifrån.
Polarbear-repair (2020-03-09 02:11:31+00:00): 2 of the 3 buildings you deleted are still visible in Bing as you cited, and Maxar and Ersi as well. 

Restored + refined
Blueberry (2020-03-07 15:56:38+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OSM. Je me suis permis de compléter votre contribution en mettant les attributs sur le bâtiment et en spécifiant les activités (a corriger si vous le souhaitez)

Eric [Blueberry]
aharvey (2020-03-06 06:59:38+00:00): What's the reason these should be removed?
kartler175 (2020-03-10 16:30:45+00:00): Bitte mit der Bedeutung der Rollen bei Mitgliedern von Multipolygonrelationen beschäftigen und http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.69225&lat=52.40034&zoom=14&opacity=1.00 berichtigen.
kartler175 (2020-03-10 16:34:17+00:00): Und Straßen nicht mit irgenwelchen Landflächen überdecken, sondern von ihnen trennen.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-03-06 08:10:09+00:00): Hallo Tim,
jetzt hast Du alle Daten inkl. Adresse gelöscht. 
Kannst Du die Adressdaten wieder eintragen?
Gruß
Roger
eggie (2020-03-06 06:35:57+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

review:

In OSM taggen we zoveel mogelijk bij op de adresnodes.. dus niet op het gebouw zelf. De naam van het gebouw is niet de naam van de bankinstelling. 
Op de adresnode kun je aangeven dat er een bankkantoor is en ook nog een atm.
Kijk je nog even?
Zie
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Tag:amenity%3Dbank
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-06 21:48:23+00:00): reverted by changeset  #81885409
Je edits heb ik teruggezet.. Kijk nog eens goed in de wiki hoe een bank te mappen.
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2020-03-06 22:02:53+00:00): Laat je echter niet ontmoedigen door wat kritiek. 
De atletiekbaan het ik ook weer aangepast.

Lees je goed in en en gewoon beginnen met mappen.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-03-06 06:41:57+00:00): Review.. Voor HBO en universiteit gebruiken we amenity=university. ROC en AOC (MBO) is amenity=college....maar VWO en VMBO wordt getagd als amenity=school. Kijk je nog even?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-06 08:04:07+00:00): Om getagd naar amenity=school
Geen universiteit hier.
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-03-06 08:45:01+00:00): 'k denk dat het er niet op verbeterd is. 
De vorige mapper had het zo opgelost dat het binnenterrein een grasveld was. 
Dat is gedaan met multipolygonen.
De leisure=track is dan aangeven op het vlak 
Nu is alles een track geworden. 
Hier een voorbeeld hoe zoiets te mappen  https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.80506/4.69705
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-03-06 21:57:50+00:00): Tagging hersteld van atletiekbaan.
mariotomo (2021-12-25 01:43:54+00:00): hola youthmapper. sigues en el entrenamiento hacia liderazgo local? y aprovechando de las oportunidades de OSM? ojalá que sí. aquí te faltaron comentar que no hace falta dar nombres descriptivos a los objetos, para eso OSM tiene un sistema muy completo y complejo de etiquetas.  si vuelves a mapear, con gusto te se apoya.
danieldegroot2 (2022-08-08 10:28:12+00:00): @mariotomo This was a project anyone could edit -not lead by youthmappers- and has since been archived.
https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/7260

This user has not made any edits since.

You can still discuss this project on the HOT mailing list if needed.
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/hot
ma-rt-in (2020-09-12 14:05:05+00:00): Hallo,
welche Quelle hast du hier benutzt? Node 7270587577 wird sicherlich nicht auf einer Kreuzung liegen.
vg
Theodin (2020-04-16 19:14:39+00:00): Hi fellow mapper!
Today i stumbled over your tagess way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/778704015
Maybe you can add the missing tags, as it is unusable otherwise.
Regards, Theodin
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-03-27 21:47:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 82733493 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some problematical edits in the Philippines.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3587 , previous block and numerous changeset discussion comments for more information.
Mike Baggaley (2020-03-19 22:13:31+00:00): Hi, if this is not legally accessible on foot (i.e.there is a no pedestrians sign), please use foot=no, rather than access=no. If it is just unsafe for pedestrians then it should not be tagged as illegal for pedestrians. Can you please review?

Thanks,
Mike
JimboE (2020-04-08 12:34:06+00:00): Hi Mike
Many thanks for the suggestion, I have changed access to yes and foot no, based on your advice. It's part of a main motorway so certainly no safe for pedestrians.

Thanks
James
eggie (2020-03-06 07:34:22+00:00): Beste... je hoeft niet aan te geven op een wandelpad dat je er niet mag fietsen. dat is default.
Beter weghalen  dus...
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-06 07:41:27+00:00): Dat het een onduidelijke situatie is  dat is zeker, maar er staat hier nergens een dwingende pijl naar links. Je mag als fietser gewoon
 richting brug. Het is niet verstandig om het toch weer op eenrichting te zetten. Ik zou het dus juist even op oneway=no laten staan totdat er meer duidelijk is.
'k Moet de rechter nog zien die je ongelijk gaat geven als je hier een bekeuring zou oplopen.
Svp oneway=yes op dat stukje weghalen.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-03-06 07:56:42+00:00): Waar staat hier een bord dat je niet richting brug mag komende vanaf de Vrije Geer?
Dan rijdt iemand toch niet helemaal naar de rotonde Baden Powellweg  :)
Wat zegt de gemeente? Tot zolang beter dat stukje op oneway=no laten staan.