piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abrensch (2019-02-24 10:47:12+00:00): Hallo Lokalfürst,

schaust Du Dir bitte mal den Way hier an:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/671773299

der hat "oneway=true" (nicht "yes"!), genau wie der andere von Deiner neuen Gabel, und das ist tückisch, weil das wird nicht gerendert (aber von manchen Routern wie yes behandelt)

Und unabhängig von yes oder true ist das oneway-tagging an dieser Gabel einfach falsch, und es sperrt den Weg.

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
Lokalfuerst (2019-03-03 16:30:33+00:00): Arndt, Danke fuer die Hinweise. Die verlängerte Gabel, das war ein Fehler von mir; hatte ich bereits korrigiert. Habe nun auch die oneway tags von true auf yes gesetzt. Mir war leider nicht bekannt dass die Syntax so streng ausgelegt wird.
Gruss Lokalfuerst
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-23 13:17:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67493564 where the changeset comment is: Revert more muppetry in USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2545 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-02-23 13:17:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67493564 where the changeset comment is: Revert more muppetry in USA.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2545 and previous blocks.
JFK73 (2019-02-27 15:19:48+00:00): Bonjour,

C'est sympa mais il manque les pistes ;)
Plus sérieusement il va falloir faire un revert de ce groupe de modifications, désolé. 

Vous pouvez encore télécharger les données et les sauvegarder à titre personnel bien sûr !

Si vous ne connaissez pas l'utilisation du plugin reverter sous JOSM, je peux vous expliquer ou le faire.
Bonne soirée
Themepark325 (2019-02-27 15:39:57+00:00): Bonjour, oui je m'en suis douté ! Je suis assez novice sur OSM, du coup ça m'arrangerait que vous le fassiez ;) est-il possible de faire des modifs pour soi-meme (ex ce groupe de modifications) que je puisse continuer sans ajouter "de fausses informations à la carte" ?
Merci d'avance.
JFK73 (2019-02-27 16:11:18+00:00): Bienvenue dans OSM alors !
C'est très propre pour du travail de novice;)

N'effacez rien pour l'instant, je vais me renseigner. Je connais mal l'éditeur iD que vous utilisez.
Dans JOSM, on peut enregistrer tout ce qu'on a dessiné (le calque) dans un fichier .osm ce qui est très pratique. 

@+
JFK73 (2019-03-08 15:56:57+00:00): Rebonjour
J'ai sauvegardé votre travail dans un fichier osm. (pas tous les logiciels sont compatibles) Il est accessible ici: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XVgTKhIDJLCL6tinau26PYAkUF6UxfJ_?usp=sharing

Sinon la version imaginaire d'OSM s'appelle OpenGeofiction https://opengeofiction.net/
Je crois qu'il faut s'inscrire comme sur OSM et après on fait ce qu'on veut.
Amusez-vous bien !
Themepark325 (2019-03-08 16:18:38+00:00): Bonjour, merci beaucoup d'avoir prêté attention à ma demande ! Je vais aller teste tout ça alors. Bonne journée et encore merci à vous ;)
philippec (2019-09-01 20:27:41+00:00): Met de combinatie van foto, luchtfoto en aiv heb ik de defibrillator juist gezet.
pk_ravi (2019-07-23 05:26:34+00:00): "Hi  Bernhard Hiller,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Alor Setar, I have come across the way 672358281 classified as 'track'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around,it can be classified as 'residential'.

Please look into this and share your thoughts on this. 

Thanks in advance."
Bernhard Hiller (2019-07-23 09:43:47+00:00): Please see https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=756538#p756538
j numminen (2019-02-22 18:31:33+00:00): source=survey tuli vahingossa, en käynyt paikan päällä vaan luotin muistikuviin ja liikkeiden nettisivuilta löytyviin tietoihin.
pitscheplatsch (2019-02-23 08:59:56+00:00): Hi fire1tex, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason, behind deleting several mapped ways, which are still visible the used sattelite imagery? Thanks.

More information about your changeset: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=67475288
fire1tex (2019-02-23 17:26:19+00:00): Hello,  pitscheplatsch 
I am happy to explain these changes. First, about me, I am the Installation GIS manager for Fort Hood. I am a Department of the Army civilian and work on Fort Hood. The reason for the removal of these center lines are due to the fact that they are "tank trails" for use by heavy armored military vehicles only, many of these trails were drawn in the maneuver and and live fire areas. They should never appear on any open mapping as they may be mistaken for use of the general public since this area of the installation is not closed to public travel. Additionally, some of these trails were drawn in the impact areas and have unexploded ordinance risks. I will continue to update the installation area roads so that the potential risks of inadvertent travel in these areas are minimized. The road centerlines I leave or modify are authorized for use by Privately Owned Vehicles in this area. My office on Fort Hood is responsible for the "database of record" for mapping on the the installation. There are and will be many more changes to Fort Hood as I work my way around the 220,000 acre military installation. My official contact email is russell.a.barfield.civ@mail.mil should you wish to verify my identity or have any further questions. 

Regards, 
Russ Barfield
Stereo (2019-02-24 10:37:45+00:00): Hi Russ,

This does happen every once in a while, for example for paths in national parks that shouldn't be used by hikers. Deleting, however, isn't the best way to do it, and can even be considered vandalism: OSM maps the reality on the ground, whatever that is.

Here, the reality is that no one should be driving on those tracks. If the ways are simply deleted, they will quite certainly be added again by motivated mappers, and probably not be tagged properly.

The right way to do it is to change the 'access' tag to 'no'. Most maps will then show this as inaccessible, and routing software will not take you across it when e.g. driving from Killeen to Gatesville.

If you want a hand, I can undelete all the ways you've deleted and tag them all as no access?

Your job sounds interesting! Thank you for your interest in OpenStreetMap.

Cheers from across the big puddle,

Guillaume, for the OSM Data Working Group
fire1tex (2019-02-24 18:11:22+00:00): Guilluame,
Understood, I'm not sure that un-deleting and re-tagging them as no access is the best way to go here, these trails were poorly drawn and attributed in the first place, wrong names and types, odd connections and so forth. Many of the trails are actually not authorized by our environmental folks and much work is underway to rehabilitate the land and these trails might actually ceased to be used as time goes on. In viewing the line work it appears that many were drawn in from old imagery and don't exist today. I certainly don't want my work on the installation or OSM to be viewed as vandalism, I will certainly defer to the community and it's recommendations, but I would prefer that the deletions stand. I also have Operational Security concerns regarding the electrical system being mapped on the installation in an open source format. This information could be used to the detriment of readiness of the installation by adverse parties. I guess my bottom line is, just because it is "reality on the ground" does not necessarily mean that it should be shown in open source on military installations. Again I will defer to your judgement, please advise on a way forward.

Russ
phidauex (2019-02-24 20:03:18+00:00): Unsolicited recommendation: the "abandoned" prefix to the highway tag can be helpful for cases like this, since it will prevent the line from being rendered, but will still show up in the editor so that someone doesn't come along and just add it again.

A tag combo like, "abandoned:highway=track, access=no, note='in remediation, no access'" would prevent rendering, and inform mappers that the paths they are seeing aren't intended to stay there for long.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2020-04-18 14:34:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 83745132 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some fantasy mapping in Saudi Arabia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82081785 for more info
8amotors (2019-08-22 22:58:58+00:00): We change address to 4350 S. 38th St. Ste. 170 Phoenix AZ 85040
M!dgard (2019-12-31 14:31:37+00:00): Ik zou dit geen deel van de straat noemen, het is ziet eruit als privéoprit voor twee huizen.
viloan (2019-02-22 18:28:44+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Viajero Perdido (2019-03-30 19:27:04+00:00): Hi badenk.

What have you done to Abraham Lake?  You turned it into an intermittent riverbank.  This is wrong; it's a man-made reservoir, never empty (therefore not intermittent), and deserves to be labelled as Abraham Lake..  (The existing CanVec name nodes are insufficient for the name.)

I'm referring to the large, wide body of water on the east edge of this changeset area, of course.
badenk (2019-03-30 21:05:54+00:00): Hola VP:

Thanks for the notice. I think I see what might have transpired. The river basins in the Rockies are a mess, so I was cleaning them up, specifically relabeling braided streams.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6684472#map=10/52.1453/-116.7174

As you may see, this 'riverbank' is a bit of a monster.  I will attempt to split this object up to correct the issue.

FWIW, I do not think the reservoir is full very often, as it is primarily used for flood abatement.

thanks,
Baden
Viajero Perdido (2019-03-30 21:12:54+00:00): Thanks for following up on this.  BTW, my understanding is, the reservoir is primarily for power generation, with flood abatement as a fringe benefit.  (Just before Y2K, I was amazed to see it full-to-overflowing, a bit of "electricity storage", just in case, I suppose.)
badenk (2019-03-30 23:05:14+00:00): Hola VP:

I made a plot of the reservoir levels for you:

http://baden.nu/Abraham_Lake_Level.gif

gracias,
Baden
Viajero Perdido (2019-03-30 23:14:32+00:00): Ah okay, thanks.  I can guess where the "empty" line is (start of chart), and I see it's never gone back to empty.

Anyway, if it's tagged as water=reservoir, I think that should be sufficient, as reservoirs by definition go up and down.  Leaving it tagged as intermittent would be unusual (I've never seen it elsewhere) to say the least.

Saludos,
VP  :)
Hjart (2019-02-22 19:15:46+00:00): Bemærk at man på Mapillary kan skimte et "cykel forbudt" skilt ved sydenden af denne sti. Af samme grund var den blevet rettet tilbage til gangsti for 2 dage siden. Se historikken: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114717954/history
Tntdruid (2019-02-22 19:45:38+00:00): Der er ikke noget skilt når man kommer fra Københavnsvej var der i mandags
Hjart (2019-02-22 20:07:00+00:00): Ok. På https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/4kbcmn7XxatdwIBN_dsSCA fra 2016 kan man lige skimte skiltet. Hvis det ikke er der længere vil det nok være en god ide at sætte en note på stien. Eller endnu bedre lave, lave nye Mapillary billeder der tydeligt viser stien, så twisten kan blive endeligt afgjort ;-)
pio2_122 (2019-02-22 20:41:11+00:00): Wycofane.
mueschel (2019-02-27 14:13:31+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the meaning of the keys

Kode Wilayah
kode wilayah
kode Wilayah
Kode wilayah Desa
kode Wilayah desa

These all seem to be spelling mistakes and are not used in any other place. Could you check that?
pio2_122 (2019-02-22 20:37:45+00:00): Wycofane.
viloan (2019-02-22 19:13:21+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Dimacn (2019-02-23 04:44:11+00:00): Здравствуйте. Что такое Д№8 ? Если это номер, почему две штуки? И зачем название вашему лесу? Тег name у домов не заполняется. У объектов, которые не имеют официальных собственных имён, тег name не прописывается. Подробнее https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
pio2_122 (2019-02-22 20:41:54+00:00): Wycofane
Hjart (2019-02-22 20:17:57+00:00): Hvis det ikke virker med den GPS nav du bruger til MTB, så vil jeg mene der er noget galt med din "GPS nav"
pio2_122 (2019-02-22 20:39:34+00:00): Wycofane.
gnkgia (2024-10-06 15:14:00+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping buildings. Could you please specify the hashtags #Accenture etc.?
Thanks
R0bst3r (2019-02-26 08:12:06+00:00): Hallo elv,
willkommen bei OSM.
Ich habe deine Änderungen geprüft und habe folgende Anmerkungen:
* disused=yes sollte nicht mehr verwendet werden, dafür kann es als prefix verwendet werden, z.B. als disused:amenity=pharmacy. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:
Zur Einführung empfehle ich den Beginners' guide auf wiki.osm.org. Dort findet man auch Anleitungen zu allen Themen. Ansonsten wird einem unter forum.osm.org gerne geholfen.
Viel Erfolg noch und nicht entmutigen lassen!
Grüße
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67477995
pyram (2019-07-27 19:22:16+00:00): Hallo hardtailer,
es ist immer schön, wenn jemand mit Ortskenntnis die Daten verbessert. Aber wahrscheinlich hast Du bei den beiden Wegen hier eine ungewollte Änderung gemacht:
Die Wege waren bisher als Feldwege erfasst. Darauf dürfen auch Fahrräder und Fußgänger sich bewegen.
Jetzt ist es https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=cycleway?uselang=de erfasst, was Fußgänger und Traktoren verbieten würde.
Falls da tatsächlich ein blaues Verkehrsschild (welches?: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/ )steht, dann wahrscheinlich "gemischter Rad-/Fußweg" mit oder ohne "landw. Verkehr frei". Das würde dann anders erfasst werden.
hardtailer (2019-07-28 13:05:51+00:00): Hallo pyram,

ich finde es auch schön zu erfahren, dass Änderungen noch einmal hinterfragt werden, sonst könnte, ja jeder jedem Humbug eintragen.
In diesem Fall haben wir beide Recht :-)
Die beiden Wege waren in Wirklichkeit nie Feldwege sondern sind als Radwege auf die grüne Wiese gebaut worden. Landwirtschaftliche Fahrzeuge sind nicht zugelassen.
Allerdings muss ich dir mit dem kombinierten Rad- und Fußweg recht geben, ich war heute morgen extra noch einmal kontrollieren, da ich mir nicht 100% sicher war.
Es ist also ein kombinierter Rad- und Fußweg, mit zwischenzeitlich angebrachten Zusatzschilf "Mofa frei".

Ich werde mich dazu mal noch tiefer einlesen müssen, denn auf Anhieb kann ich z.B. keine Mofazeile finden um es ganz richtig zu machen.

Danke und viele Grüße
pyram (2019-07-28 18:56:31+00:00): Danke auch und:
mofa=yes ist die Lösung ;-)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:mofa?uselang=de
Der Königsweg wäre noch
traffic_sign=DE:240,1022-11
(beides könnte man mit JOSM bzw. dem  http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/ herausfinden)
viloan (2019-02-22 20:05:59+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jose Luis Infante (2019-02-24 23:53:41+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Squares_and_plazas
Etimodato (2019-02-25 13:04:01+00:00): Un parque es un área de espacio abierto para uso recreativo, generalmente diseñado y en estado semi natural con áreas de césped, árboles y arbustos.
Vodevil_Mark (2025-06-26 21:25:27+00:00): Зачем было ставить тег bicycle = no?
Гордеич (2025-06-26 22:08:18+00:00): Что бы я помнил чем 6 лет назад была вызвана такая необходимость ...
Jose Luis Infante (2019-02-24 23:53:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Squares_and_plazas
blackadder (2019-03-18 13:40:27+00:00): You have retagged many schools in and around Northwich as universities. Can you explain why please?
SK53 (2019-03-18 13:51:45+00:00): Given that this is clearly wrong (blackadder knows why I know that to be so)I suggest a straight reversion.
blackadder (2019-03-18 14:00:01+00:00): SK53, I've sent this user a message as I have issues with other edits too. Have commenced some reversion.
Jose Luis Infante (2019-02-24 23:53:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpedestrian#Squares_and_plazas
pangoSE (2020-01-25 14:54:56+00:00): Hi, why are you splitting these? And if they are to be split why along highways?
pangoSE (2020-01-25 16:11:15+00:00): I ask because I personally really dislike the sight of the empty areas between roads and forest when the forest is not overlapping the road.
I much prefer to draw them between lakes and bordering on power lines where possible.
archie (2020-01-25 16:17:44+00:00): Could not agree more!
cepesko (2020-01-25 18:53:54+00:00): I only remember cleaning up screwed up MPs with overlaying landuses/naturals (e.g. water+wood). Splitting along highways only because where there's a road there can't be forest. Feel free to connect or even make MPs bigger again or to reverse CS.
pangoSE (2020-01-26 16:26:01+00:00): Thanks for the response cepesko. Additionally: Linking/merging landuse to roads is IMO a very bad practice. Even with a filter in JOSM you can inadvertly end up changing a road when you update the landuse to match background tiles.
cepesko (2020-01-26 19:01:47+00:00): I agree. I'm pretty certain that I did not glue any landuses to highways. Have you checked carefully the history of nodes, too, not just way? Only because I'm the creator of a PM, e.g., doesn't necessarily mean that I created evey member. I would almost bet that I had used already existing ways back then.
pangoSE (2020-01-26 19:08:10+00:00): Hi, sorry I did not mean to accuse you of anything really, I honestly did not look very closely on your changes. I mainly reacted to the changeset comment. My last message was meant as a tip and I regret not stating that more clearly.
Have a nice day and happy mapping.
IgorEliezer (2019-02-23 07:09:54+00:00): Por que as áreas residenciais foram deletadas? landuse=residencial não é só para condomínios fechados.
IgorEliezer (2019-02-23 07:19:05+00:00): Exemplos:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/-23.4541/-46.5394
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-25.0809/-50.1627
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/-22.98394/-43.22352
eduardoaddad (2019-02-23 10:26:03+00:00): Olá 

Esse recurso  nao  é usado no Open Street Map  para cidades e seus bairros. 

As cidades se São Paulo  e outras no mundo somente  utilizam para mapear condomínios (área de acesso  restrito).
IgorEliezer (2019-02-23 16:05:53+00:00): Olá tudo bem,

Com todo o respeito, não é o que o wiki diz (ver link 1) e não se confirma em áreas bem mapeadas abaixo:
Paris: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/161636225
Berlin: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/550721164#map=16/52.4929/13.2743
Washington Metro Area (EUA): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/112647389#map=15/38.9945/-77.1348
Londres: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/50075372#map=15/51.5606/-0.1057
Buenos Aires: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/418255230#map=15/-34.6100/-58.4153
Atenas: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/70840316#map=16/37.9794/23.7165
Natal (Brasil): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/8050005#map=13/-5.8442/-35.2294, fora o exemplo do Rio de Janeiro e outras no meu comentário anterior.

Não é porque São Paulo e a maioria das cidades brasileiras não usam que isso seja um padrão. O que eu vejo no Brasil é que se mapeou primeiramente as áreas residentiais das aglomerações subnormais (importado do IBGE) e condomínios e então, num estágio superior, começa-se a mapear toda a área urbana conforme o uso predominante: residencial, varejo, empresarial, industrial etc. E eu nem estava usando o "landuse"="residential" para dividir bairros, mas estava contornando a mancha urbana da cidade de Tietê (nem estava pronto).

Mais ainda, usa-se a chave "residential"="*" para diferenciar os tipos de área predominantemente residencial: "urban", "rural", "gated" (i.e. condomínio fechado), "irregular_settlement" (i.e. aglomeração subnormal) etc, sendo que estes dois últimos não estão documentados mas há um uso consistente no TagInfo (ver link 2).

Links:
1. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse=residential
2. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/residential#values
MarvinMep (2019-02-22 20:53:31+00:00): O Decreto, na verdade é de 2009. Errei o ano.
Carnildo (2019-02-25 02:13:09+00:00): Please don't glue parking lots to buildings like you've done here.  Most parking lots don't actually run right up against buildings, and it's a pain to fix it if you need to, for example, add a bike rack between the building and the parking lot.
Tilia_J (2019-02-22 20:58:20+00:00): https://wandelnet.nl/traject/law-4-10-oosterbeek-rozendaal-0
eggie (2019-02-22 21:30:39+00:00): Dag LindhoutJ,
Volgens mij kloppen de twee routes
Gr. Eggie
Tomas Straupis (2019-02-23 06:30:45+00:00): Vilniuje mikrožolyčių sužymėjimus atitrauktus nuo takelių aš panaikinsiu. Vilniuje stengiamės žymėti kokybiškai, atsižvelgiant į topologiją ir bendrus žemėlapio poreikius.
PovilasDew (2019-02-24 18:02:24+00:00): Redaguojant stengiausi parinkti mažiausiai ambiguous variantą - ten kur yra numatytas takelis (o ne ištrypta žolė), ten žolės landuse nėra. Aukštos kokybės imagery leidžia atskirti kur kas yra. Kodėl iš pažiūros niekam netrukdantys nuo tako ašių atitraukti landuse lopinėliai (bet kokio dydžio) yra kokybės užtikrinimo problema?