piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
zimba (2015-05-15 16:53:16+00:00): Najo, sonst haette man halt immer alles doppelt dort stehen, deshalb wird wohl nur der punkt mit hightway=busstop gerendert. Welche karte uebrigens? Mir waer beim normalen mapnik stil noch nie aufgefallen, das eine public_transport=stop_position gerendert wird.

Bitte aber auf keinen fall den name= tag loeschen, weil der ist 'richtiger' als das ref= (ref ist eher fuer referenznummern/abkuerzungen gedacht).
emergency99 (2015-05-15 18:31:06+00:00): Den Name würde ich eh nicht löschen. Ich verwende die Verkehrskarte aus dem Menü auf osm.org Und da tauchen bei manchen Stationen die nur durch eine Halteposition markiert sind wenn sie nur einen Namen haben keine Namen auf. Ich denke doppelt ist hier besser. Aber ich muss eben noch abwarten wie es dann auf der Karte aussieht. Wenn was zu viel ist (was ich aber nicht denke) dann wird der ref wieder entfernt. Aber wenn der Ref bei Buslinien bewirkt, dass die Nummer angezeigt wird, wird es bei der Station ähnlich gerendert werden. Denke ich mal. Bin halt grad in der Trial and Error Phase.
literan (2015-05-16 08:07:52+00:00): вы создали точку без тегов - удаляю
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:19+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
jumbanho (2015-05-15 17:27:16+00:00): Hi I was just looking at your work on this.  There seem to be some freeways and ramps that you've added that are already on the map.  In the link below, you can see two westbound and two eastbound carriageways.  We generally only create separate ways for physically separated ways, e.g. the separate east and west bound ways.  The lane numbers are put on the way itself.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:50+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:13:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:07+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:18+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:22+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:28+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:32+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
GerdP (2015-10-23 19:03:59+00:00): Bitte prüfen:
In Bing sieht man einen highway=track,
allerdings bezweifle ich, dass der den gleichen Namen (Rosenbacher Straße)
hat wie way 51409666. 
Von daher sehe ich keinen Grund,
highway=unknown nach highway=track zu ändern und den Namen zu löschen.
Oder zeigt Bing nicht mehr den aktuellen
Zustand ?
elefn (2015-10-27 20:05:31+00:00): Wenn du Weg 24989397 oder Weg 54562327 meinst, die sind beide bereits mit "fixme" gekennzeichnet. Es kann sehr wohl sein, dass diese beiden Wegen den gleichen oder ähnlichen Namen tragen, da sie sehr nahe und mehr oder weniger "parallel" zum "echten" Weg verlaufen. Aber, ja sollte mal jemand prüfen. Ich werde noch einen Hinweis einfügen.
GerdP (2015-10-27 20:14:12+00:00): sorry, mir geht es um die Wege 54563551,345233068 und 345233065.
Hätte eigentlich dabei stehen sollen :-(
elefn (2015-10-27 21:10:25+00:00): Achso, die meinst du, okay. Ich habe damals lediglich ein "fixme" Attribut hinzugefügt: fixme=genauer Verlauf/Status unklar/Widerspruch zu Bing-Luftbild
siehe https://www.dropbox.com/s/vmoqs7sillrdx70/2015-10-27%2022_04_00-Java-OpenStreetMap-Editor.png?dl=0
GerdP (2015-10-27 21:20:30+00:00): okay, damit  willst also sagen, dass Du die Örtlichkeiten auch nur "von oben" kennst, richtig ? Ich sehe nämlich aktuell keinen
nennenswerten Widerspruch zum Luftbild.
elefn (2015-10-28 18:47:42+00:00): Ja, ich kenne nur die Bing-Draufsicht. Ich habe aber ein "fixme" draufgepackt, weil hier definitiv Infos fehlen und der Straßenname wahrscheinlich auch Unsinn ist. Dort auf dem Acker scheint auch ein kleiner Graben zu sein. Das muss sich halt mal jemand vor Ort anschauen.
GerdP (2015-10-28 18:52:36+00:00): okay, dann ändere ich das unübliche highway=unknown auf highway=road
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:35+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:42+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
MGSchnitzl (2024-02-22 12:33:51+00:00): Dieser Weg gehört nicht zur Liebigstr.
tracktype: grade 4 vom Schlegel bis zum Wald !
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
PhoeniX7 (2015-05-15 11:42:23+00:00): Комментарий к правкам неверный. Скопировался из предыдущей. 
Правильный: добавление АЗС и церквушки.
mavl (2019-03-06 17:14:53+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:24:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
syskenjp (2015-05-15 11:48:01+00:00): 街角マップ by emap #長崎県 #長崎市
ここは、 ｘｘｘｘｘｘｘ
http://bit.ly/1cDj9SL 
0件のリツイート 0件のお気に入り
返信  リツイート
mavl (2019-03-07 16:24:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:24:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:24:56+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-26 18:04:20+00:00): I notice that you've deleted a number of untagged "fixme arrow" ways such as http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28406968/history .  Are you going to complete the mapping there, or indicate (perhaps via a note or a fixme tag) that there's work still to be done there?  Otherwise it looks like the area's complete and it's not; the previous mapper deliberately left it so that there was more work obviously to do.
rbuch703 (2015-05-26 19:22:32+00:00): Hi, it was not my intention to delete anything useful. I'm not familiar with the concept of "fixme arrows". Could you please elaborate?
SomeoneElse (2015-05-26 19:35:47+00:00): They were common in 2007 and 2008 or so; the idea was to indicate (via an untagged way) that something like a track or fence continued in a particular direction. What most people use now is either add a fixme tag or, since Bing imagery is available for most of this area now but wasn't then, just continue the ways based on the imagery.The one that I linked to will have been drawn by eye from the track, so a bit of "nudging towards the imagery" might make sense too (assuming it's not obviously offset).
rbuch703 (2015-05-26 20:46:53+00:00): Ah, ok, I didn't know that. I was removing these ways assuming that they were remnants, either when people forgot to tag ways they mapped, or when ways supposed to be used in multipolygons were either removed without being deleted, or were never added in the first place.

Is there any community consent as to what to do with untagged ways when they are not used in relations (e.g. delete them, convert them to notes, ...)? I don't want to delete other people's work, but I would like to clean up fragments that look like mapping accidents when I encounter them.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-26 20:58:50+00:00): I don't remember much discussion about them at all (I think that they got briefly mentioned on IRC in the last year - but that's probably it).  As they were originally meant as "fixmes", and predated the availability of decent aerial imagery, I'd probably be tempted to use the aerial imagery to complete the partial way, or if that's not possible add a fixme tag to it to say that's it's incomplete.  there are tools now that can help mappers identify fixmes, but nothing that can easily look for a "strange-looking untagged arrow".  Similarly, where I've come across stuff like http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/31433423 (there are quite a few around Nottingham) I normally try and align to the Bing imagery and tag as what it appears to be - either a hedge or a field boundary or whatever, and stick source=Bing on it.
rbuch703 (2015-05-27 06:59:27+00:00): Ok, then I'll be more careful to identify those arrows and either leave them be or map the area from aerial imagery before deleting them.
gileri (2015-05-15 14:43:21+00:00): Bonjour,

Attention vous avez supprimé TOUTE la rue du Lieutenant Colonel Prévost, et non pas la section mentionnée en commentaire : 

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=31170289

J'ai restauré la partie est de la rue dans le changeset suivant : 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31178584
zarl (2015-11-01 14:44:41+00:00): Das an der Ecke Lederer- und Münchner Strasse eingezeichnete Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345253914 existiert in den relativ alten Bing-Luftbildern nicht, die hier von dir verwendet wurden. Hast du das vor Ort gesehen, oder was? Geht leider nicht aus dem changeset Kommentar hervor.

Tipp: das 80cm Bayern Luftbild ist wesentlich neuer. 

Ich möchte auch (nochmal) daran erinnern, dass changeset Kommentare sinnvoll sind und auch gegenüber den anderen Mappern eine freundliche Geste darstellen.
zarl (2015-11-06 14:35:11+00:00): War jetzt eh vor Ort und habe die neuen Gebäude eingetragen.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:04+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
PlaneMad (2016-08-31 07:56:00+00:00): Hi, Kaveri Nivas is missing a tag, is it a hotel?
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:08+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:12+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:15+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:20+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:23+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:27+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
eggie (2020-07-17 20:54:36+00:00): Al jaren geleden een account, maar nooit de welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik.. bij deze..Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Jojo4u (2015-05-16 10:36:08+00:00): Hallo BSt-Lew, schön dass du dich weiter des Netzes annimmst. Ein Hinweis: "and" als Trenner gibt es in OSM nicht, das gauge mit Semikolon zu trennen war korrekt.

z.B. hier: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25406400

LG Joachim

LG Joachim
user_2780130 (2015-05-18 08:10:07+00:00): Hallo Jojo4u,
ja, ich bin weiter am SSB-Netz dran. Da gibt es noch einige "Baustellen" :)
Danke für den Hinweis zu dem von mir verwendeten Trenner "and". Mir war aufgefallen, daß mit Semikolon der Tag immer rot markiert und mit einem "Achtung"-Zeichen versehen wurde. Das scheint mir demnach auch nicht einwandfrei zu sein. Gibt es keine anderen Optionen?
Auf jeden Fall werde ich jetzt erst einmal wieder das Semikolon einsetzen.
Schöne Grüße Jürgen
Jojo4u (2015-05-18 14:10:27+00:00): Das Semikolon wird von deinen veralteten Editor Potchlatch (letzte Version 2011) fälschlicherweise angemecket. Für einige Tags ist das valide zu benutzen (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:gauge). Ich empfehle wenn du noch mehr vor hast JOSM zu benutzen. Für kleine Edits lohnt es sich auch mal iD anzuschauen.
user_2780130 (2015-05-19 07:05:01+00:00): Der Editor Potlatch hat den enormen Vorteil, dass keine zusätzliche Installation erforderlich ist. JOSM kann und darf ich selbst leider nicht installieren (obliegt der Unternehmens-IT). Ich werde JOSM aber beantragen.
Privat habe ich JOSM zwar installiert, aber aus bisher ungeklärten Gründen läuft es auf meinem Rechner nicht. Deswegen arbeite ich bisher nur mit Potlatch. Tut ja weitestgehend ganz ordentlich :)
Richard (2015-05-19 12:57:21+00:00): @Jojo4u: Potlatch 2 was most recently updated in 2014, not 2011.
Jojo4u (2015-05-19 13:43:48+00:00): @Richard I see. I looked at release date of version 2.3 which was in 2011. The build is newer, yes.
Richard (2015-05-19 14:04:47+00:00): Yes, I don't use version numbers on P2 because I can never remember how all that git tagging stuff works. :)
Jojo4u (2015-05-19 16:15:30+00:00): Well a new version with some announcement would fight the perception "Potlatch is dead" ;)
Jojo4u (2015-05-19 16:17:59+00:00): @BSt-Lew Um das Editor-Thema zu schließen: JOSM läuft auch als JAR oder Webstart-Datei hier ist keine Installation nötig. Der Validator ist sehr nützlich, gerade bei bei Geometrieänderungen von highway/railway.
literan (2015-05-16 00:00:05+00:00): ну и зачем надо было удалять полигон со стройплощадкой?
literan (2015-05-16 06:53:05+00:00): ваши правки настолько хаотичны и беспорядочны, настолько нарушают правила (например, одну и ту же дорогу вы нарисовали три раза поверх друг друга), что я их полностью откатываю - полезное (название улицы и номера корпусов) - оставляю
naoliv (2015-05-22 13:02:29+00:00): Tiago, o que você quis representar aqui?
Modimir (2015-05-15 13:57:28+00:00): rein a voir avec "ajout du parc nathalie gautier" => modification des arbres autour paridieu
muralito (2015-05-15 20:38:23+00:00): El POI que agregaste lo separé del nodo de dirección, porque en esa dirección pueden haber muchos otros elementos.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-12-05 13:40:57+00:00): Strongly smells like an import. What is the source ?
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:33+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse (2015-05-15 14:43:26+00:00): Does http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3079332842/history really have the name "tree" as well as being a tree?  If it doesn't have an actual name, there's no need to create one for OpenStreetMap - the tag "natural=tree" describes that it is a tree.

Oh - and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:44+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
SomeoneElse (2015-12-08 16:55:56+00:00): Hi,
Just in case you weren't aware there are tags in fairly wide use for bird and wildlife hides - see http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=hide#values .
You don't need to give things a name (such as "Access to wildlife viewing point") unless something really has that name - no need to create a name for OpenStreetMap.  There's a bit more infomation at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only .  Hope you don't mind me mentioning this, just trying to help - any questions please don't hesitate to ask.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Marych_ (2015-05-15 17:00:05+00:00): Василий,
для чего это? Я кончно понимаю, случиось страшное.
Нужны свидетели или еще что?
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:51+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:54+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:25:57+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-03-07 16:26:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
osmeh (2015-05-15 15:28:03+00:00): Inhalt: Tore und Wege in den KGV Friederika/Schulte-Vels/Glockengarten
ork kruy (2015-05-16 04:10:53+00:00): juhihih
rasmusv (2015-05-17 11:45:58+00:00): I do not understand this changeset. Can you please elaborate? 

The railway is under construction and therefore it should not be "opened" as anything besides railway=construction. Furthermore it is not a tramline. It is a standard gauge 1435 electrified railway that runs in a separate line, but differs from standard railway by having a lower max axelweight  than the "intercity railway". In OSM this type of railway uses the railway=light_rail tag and not railway=tram.

Best regards 
Rasmus
Hjart (2015-06-07 09:47:37+00:00): Siden lixuy endnu ikke har reageret vil jeg rette banen tilbage til construction.
neuhausr (2015-05-15 21:56:42+00:00): Some of the wikipedia links are bad on the Chipotles. Not to mention, giving every individual restaurant its own link to the Chipotle wikipedia page seems like overkill???
Med (2015-05-15 21:59:16+00:00): Arghh. Crap crap crap. I usually catch all those. My bad. Going to fix that right away. Regarding the individual link, I don't know. I can imagine it to be convenient when looking at an individual one. Not my choice though. I do not remove tags.
Med (2015-05-15 22:02:36+00:00): OK, it should be fixed now. Thanks for catching this.
Nick_C (2015-05-15 15:50:08+00:00): oops, forgot to change the commit message... it should read 'added footpath between Creswell and Holt Lane'
James Derrick (2015-06-16 23:14:02+00:00): Hi,

Can I ask you to review this edit please?

From my physical survey, this is a narrow permissive footpath including up and down a steep bank with rough wooden steps cut into the hillside.

The Northumberland County Council Public Rights of Way map does not list this way, and local signs show it was a permissive path only.

It was mapped as access=permissive, which this change removes.

Given the gradient, and steps, cycling down it would be extremely dangerous even with a mountain bike, so bicycle=yes seems surprising.

It was mapped against this scheme:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#Tagging_Access_Provisions

Can you please review your edit and make appropriate changes?

Thanks,

James
chnav (2015-06-02 11:47:04+00:00): У вас трек есть этой обновленной дороги ? Вижу нарисовано спрямление у Привольного, хотелось бы поправить состояние дороги (по 5 бальной шкале) по свежему треку GPS.
chnav (2015-06-02 11:55:24+00:00): на всякий случай зачем мне это нужно
http://forums.drom.ru/kz/t1152029723-p40.html#post1170288653
Ansider (2015-06-03 04:22:20+00:00): Добавил трэк: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ansider/traces/1958075
На трэке перед спрямлением был съезд, т.к. размыло мост. Ещё в этой праке есть изменение на въезде в Семей, Соответственно и выезд из Семея теперь немного подругому. Это видно на следующем трэке http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Ansider/traces/1958078.
chnav (2015-06-03 06:19:25+00:00): Ок спасибо сегодня обработаю
chnav (2015-06-03 08:07:31+00:00): Вопрос такой - раньше от Привольного в сторону Семея до границы областей было 10км грейдера, сейчас смотрю скорость GPS под 90 км - там положили асфальт ?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-03-04 05:12:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46564425 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google Maps and Earth derived edits
laryllian (2015-05-15 18:26:16+00:00): added stairs
kartler175 (2015-05-17 11:39:48+00:00): Please avoid deleting ways which are MP-members:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=multipolygon&lon=12.43301&lat=49.94957&zoom=12&opacity=1.00&overlays=invalid_geometry_hull,duplicate_ways,intersections,intersection_lines,ring_not_closed_hull,ring_not_closed,unconnected_end_nodes,role_mismatch_hull,role_mismatch,duplicate_tags_hull,duplicate_tags
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2015-12-19 22:01:14+00:00): Agradeço que reverta as edições nesta rotunda e na junto ao GAG2. Nesta, as rotas de autocarros foram eliminadas quando editou e na junto ao GAG2, falta a quebra de linha nas intersecções.

Cumps
PedroSilv4 (2015-12-19 22:31:18+00:00): Gostaria de ajudar, mas estou com duvidas como reverter as edições, ja foram 7 meses atrás
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2015-12-19 22:32:08+00:00): ok, vou reverter.
d1g (2015-05-16 05:54:30+00:00): Вот здесь вот у тротуара и дороги нет общих точек и поэтому маршрутизатор там работать не будет правильно:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229091632#map=19/51.56249/45.99671

С https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/229091632 можно попасть на https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336144332 - у них должна быть общая точка, там заборов не было
d1g (2015-05-16 06:03:32+00:00): http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=31186951

Ступеньки https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/336144227 зря удалил, они там больше 20 лет лежат и до сих пор есть

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345325183

Асфальтовый тротуар там был, зря удалил. Гравийный участок https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345360897 это только подход к нему был 

Перед переходом необязательно было делать парковку отдельно от пешеходной площади, там паркуются на тротуаре ведь. Парковка в OSM более виртуальный объект.
user_5359 (2022-04-29 07:19:58+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345364729/history, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345364737/history. What is the meaning of the tag key=2?
Swen Wacker (2015-05-16 07:11:02+00:00): Moin,

bist Du Dir sicher, dass es den Weg 83946309, der die südliche Verlängerung des Fichtenweges darstellte und der dann auf die Steddorfer Straße abknickte, nicht (mehr) gibt?

Gruß

Swen
Piskvor (2015-05-15 22:17:11+00:00): Z nějakýho důvodu mi tu zůstal text předchozího changesetu. Mělo být "rychlostní omezení Chlumecká od D11"
chillly (2015-05-18 17:19:18+00:00): Is there really an an area of industrial landuse in the North Sea? This looks like "tagging for the renderer" to me, as your changeset comment suggests. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
philippec (2020-01-05 18:14:50+00:00): De aed is intussen verplaatst en vernieuwd.  Ik heb het aangepast in osm.  Ik heb ter plaatse niet op het drinkwaterfonteintje gelet.  Gelukkig heb ik het gefotografeerd of ik had  u niet geloofd :)  Werkt het trouwens in de zomer ?
openmidget (2020-01-05 19:45:05+00:00): :-)

Geen idee. Ik heb het gezien op een wandeling in de streek.

Merci voor de aanpassing.
mariotomo (2021-12-24 21:19:55+00:00): hola.  alguna sugerencia para entender porqué 58 edificios con el mismo nombre "R", y luego uno "P" y uno "I"?
segi (2020-07-21 13:28:11+00:00): Nazdar,
prosím ťa to jazero Deviatky si odkiaľ čerpal?
Lebo na novej OFMZ nič nie je, ani na Bingu či katastri.
šegi
aceman444 (2020-07-22 20:19:00+00:00): Zdravim, v tejto sade zmien som len opravoval koncove medzery v nazvoch. Treba sa spytat povodneho autora v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30407284 . To jazero by sa tiez hodilo trochu vylepsit, 'designation' je blbost, asi by to malo byt intermittent alebo seasonal.
segi (2020-07-23 07:08:12+00:00): Díki. Podľa toho Kayleho komentu som tam navrhol odstránenie.
Jozef Ridzon (2020-07-23 07:48:36+00:00): Pomalšie. Pozrite vlákno komentárov, čo aceman444 skopíroval. Tam je vysvetlené o akú vodnú plochu ide.
naoliv (2015-05-22 13:21:37+00:00): Antonio, você está adicionando vários pontos sem nenhum tipo de informação (apenas com nome, que muitas vezes não dá para saber do que se trata)

O que você está querendo representar em suas edições?
antonio perrone (2015-06-10 14:16:20+00:00): naoliv, estou fazendo um exercício com os pescadores de identificar os lagos onde é feito o manejo do pirarucu. Não queremos nada além da identificação do lago com seu nome. Algum problema com isso?
naoliv (2015-06-18 20:44:36+00:00): Entendi.
Dá para mapear, mas precisa utilizar outras representações.
Vou verificar certo isso e te retorno.
Aglis IRM-ED (2022-12-01 04:46:14+00:00): hi,  rcorbett, Thank you for your mapping contribution! I deleted the building (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/345403626) because the building doesn't exist in the imagery. Thank you (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30237/task/142648582)
chnav (2015-05-16 11:24:31+00:00): Привет, а зачем было двигать знак "70" с обочины в поле ? Я там с GPS проезжал, и Бинг тут хороший.
TreeTracks (2023-03-15 02:39:34+00:00): Hi again cleary, and other query... https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/345417615

The Base Map shows the road just W of this as Dalmallee Road, and this section S of the gate is unnamed. The section N of the gate (N of this way) is also called Dalmallee Road on the Base Map. Any thoughts on the name on this stretch? I think the far S section which heads E to a house should probably be a driveway too. The stretch beside the rail line is a popular route on Strava's heatmap  but I have no idea of official access. Thanks again, so glad to have your ground truthed edits to work from. Cheers Ian