piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2017-07-24 21:16:57+00:00): 
addr:city Rijssen Rijssen 
addr:housenumber 110 110 
addr:postcode 7461DX 7461DX 
addr:street Arend Baanstraat Arend Baanstraat 
name  Stichting Rijssens Leemspoor 
source BAG BAG 
source:date 2014-03-24 2014-03-24 

Dat was 'm. Foutjes worden je overigens niet kwalijk genomen. het is een leerproces.
GRi (2017-07-24 21:39:39+00:00): Die stichting leemspoor komt me helemaal niet bekend voor en die naam tag is er op gezet door hanongo zoals de history aangeeft...
GRi (2017-07-24 21:43:02+00:00): Het lijkt erop dat die informatie op het gebouw had gemoeten, daar staat (nog?) informatie over scouting op.
eggie (2017-07-25 06:20:09+00:00): In dat geval zal ik het osm-spoor even bijster zijn geweest. ...excuses...
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=31788725
Dit was jouw changeset...
ma-rt-in (2018-07-15 12:48:23+00:00): Hallo,

wer ist den dieser Dr. Wiesend in der Kreisverwaltung?
Eberth (2018-07-21 16:25:06+00:00): Der Knoten hätte ins Krankhaus gehört. Ich hab damals nicht aufgepasst.
Ganz aktuell ist Dr. Wiesend ins Quartier Süd umgezogen. Ich habe den Knoten an die richtige Stelle verschoben.
freeExec (2015-06-09 07:30:05+00:00): По-моему ты перестарался с этой фигнёй. Или думаешь эти часы ловят лучше чем смартфон? Просека она же прямая, как бы там трек не вилял, тем более в лесу и с нормальной то антенной фигня выходит.
golyanitskiy (2015-06-14 11:15:19+00:00): Часы? Шта?
freeExec (2015-06-14 12:39:52+00:00): Ну надвигал всё и вся непонятно по чему.
golyanitskiy (2015-06-14 16:52:59+00:00): Покидай ссылки на косяки, исправлю. Не непонятно по чему, а по теплокарте от стравы, но мне самому не понравился результат, если честно. Больше не буду пользоваться, все что нового было, уже внес.
SergeyAkhmetov (2015-06-07 14:38:55+00:00): Chopard Place Vendome
Stereo (2015-06-07 21:31:16+00:00): The on-the-ground rule says that we only map what actually exists. If the building has been razed, it doesn’t belong in OSM. There are some historical maps projects, but none in Luxembourg as far as I know.
SHARCRASH (2015-06-08 09:28:25+00:00): Logic! Thanks Stereo!
rickmastfan67 (2015-06-08 07:06:54+00:00): Wow, I'm sorry, but some of these areas are no way 'motorways'.  For instance, the segment that you made motorway between Economy and Baden.  There is absolutely no way it can be motorway.  This segment isn't limited-access at all.  There are a few access points to places like these 2 along it: http://binged.it/1Hh73Lu & http://binged.it/1Hh7c1E  Just those alone disqualify it from being a 'motorway'.  That segment should have stayed as a trunk highway, hands down.
rickmastfan67 (2015-06-08 07:11:10+00:00): As for the area of PA-65 around I-79.  IMO, that should have stayed as trunk too.  They allow bicycles in that area.  Tagging it as a motorway breaks that type of routing instantly once those services update their data from OSM.  Also, you missed that there IS an at-grade intersection in that area @ Toms Run Road ( http://osm.org/go/ZWtBfaR2m?m= ), right in the middle of the segment you turned into a motorway.  Motorways don't have those (except out West in Western Texas, where they are needed to access private ranches because the old US Highways out there were upgraded in place to Interstates, like I-10.  But, then again, most of them are already marked as 'trunk' in those small areas).  Also, we don't upgrade small segments of highway like this to motorway just because they have 'one' interchange.  Otherwise, trunk highways like US-19 in WV between I-79 and I-77 ( http://osm.org/go/ZTyUEY?m= ) would have several small motorway segments for it's few interchanges outside of the Oak Hill Bypass (which is a motorway).  That's just not how it works here.  Not even Google does it this way.
rickmastfan67 (2015-06-08 07:12:50+00:00): As for the 'Freedom' segment, some of that segment has a sidewalk right beside the highway (Northbound PA-65 side to the South of Freedom) which is visible in Bing.  I've never seen a motorway with one of those right smack beside the highway, without at least a guard rail, jersey barrier, or something similar helping protect the pedestrians from 'idiots' or wrecks.  If the segment between the 2 ramps had been connected to the motorway segment in Rochester without any gaps, then yes, I could see the segment being considered as a motorway.  However, because of that sidewalk, the big gap with at-grade intersections in it between Freedom and Rochester, it honestly should have stayed as a 'trunk' highway, just like the other two segments you 'upgraded' in this changeset.
rickmastfan67 (2015-06-08 07:16:29+00:00): So, in closing, most of these segments have a striking similarity to McKnight Road (US 19 Truck) in the North Hills of Pittsburgh.  On it's Northern-most segment, it has a high speed limit (50mph) and an interchange, but you don't see me upgrading it to a motorway in that area (like you did for that Economy and Baden segment).  Also, by your reasoning for the upgrades here in this changeset, PA-68 between Evans City and Butler should be a motorway.  It has a high speed limit (55mph) and no traffic lights, but it's only 2 lanes.  [sarcasm] But hey, your reasoning means it should be a motorway! [/sarcasm]

Thus, you really have to think stuff like this thru before just upgrading a road to a higher level. We don't want to screw up the routing engines that rely on us mappers not screwing up the highway classifications or any of the other tags (like # of lanes, the speed limit, & the oneway tags).  Especially since some routers have options to 'avoid motorways', and they might give somebody a messed up route because of false upgrades to that classification when the route should have never been upgraded in the first place.  Also, compare the road to other known (for sure) motorways in the area before upgrading.  Also make sure the segments are fully limited-access too before upgrading.  Doing that can solve a lot of headaches for all the mappers in the area.

Anyways, I recommend a full revert of this changeset to put those segments of PA-65 back to 'trunk' (and the ramps as trunk_link of course).
rickmastfan67 (2015-06-15 12:25:40+00:00): Reverted in Changeset 31982052.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31982052
GabMar (2015-06-07 17:45:41+00:00): No One Way direction
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-21 04:27:06+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3578631793/history - addr:state=HR? Is it safe to remove?

addr:country=HR would be quite pointless even if accurate but addr:state=HR seems simply wrong
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-10-21 04:27:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3578639803/history - addr:state=HR? Is it safe to remove?

addr:country=HR would be quite pointless even if accurate but addr:state=HR seems simply wrong
StephaneP (2016-07-16 15:40:41+00:00): Hello !
Pourquoi supprimer les motorroad=yes sur la 4 voies sud qui entre dans Nantes. Je les remets.
Virgile1994 (2016-07-17 22:54:54+00:00): Parce qu'en France, ce tag est inutile puisqu'il signifie la même chose que highway=trunk
[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:motorroad#France]
StephaneP (2016-07-18 06:26:06+00:00): Mince, le Wiki n'est pas à jour. Le tag motorroad sert à indiquer une route portant le panneau c107 "route pour automobile". Une des discussion sur le sujet : http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/highway-trunk-en-France-td5821793.html
rickmastfan67 (2015-06-08 05:46:09+00:00): I'm sorry, but there is no way Broadhead is a 'primary' highway.  A 'secondary' highway, yeah, just not primary.  First of all, it's between I-376 (motorway) and PA-51 (primary).  2nd, It's not a 'primary' state highway (meaning it doesn't have a 2-digit or 3-digit route number).  Those two other routes have more lanes, capacity, and higher speeds (at least for sure with I-376) then this route. 3rd, is it honestly a 'higher' priority highway than PA-51 in terms of design?  I honestly don't think so.

Thus, I would recommend downgrading it to secondary, which is still higher than the territory it was classified as before.

You have to think stuff like this thru before just upgrading a road to a higher level.  We don't want to screw up the routing engines that rely on us mappers not screwing up the highway classifications or any of the other tags (like # of lanes and the speed limit).
rickmastfan67 (2015-06-15 12:50:21+00:00): Broadhead downgraded to secondary in Changeset 31983183. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/31983183
SomeoneElse (2015-06-07 17:57:00+00:00): A quick note about the "tree" edits in Clipstone - dividing the area into smaller areas of different sorts of trees means that there's no single "Clipstone Forest" label currently.  I'll add that back (probably as part of a larger "landuse=forest" area that includes parts that are used for forestry, but don't currently have trees on them).

I've not created a huge multipolygon partially because the cleared gaps are "land used for forestry", and partially to avoid the issue noted at http://worstofosm.tumblr.com/post/25633720207/just-in-case-there-was-any-doubt-this-is-the .
yellowsoar (2018-06-27 04:23:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:playground
遊樂器材的種類應該用 playground=* 來標示，請不要直接以 name=* 來說明
AsgerFrank (2016-04-26 22:52:08+00:00): Hej, jeg tror du skal være opmærksom på, at tagget bus_stop ikke skal/må anbringes på en node i en way, man derimod ved siden/siderne af den, der hvor bussen holder, hvor selve stoppestedet er. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop#Bus_stop
Så der er mange forkerte efterhånden.
Hvis man tagger en node i en vej er det som der står med et stop_position, men vil jeg synes er et dårligt tag, der ikke hjælper brugeren, fordi man så  sjældent kan se hvilken vej bussen kører, og stoppestederne kan desuden jo sagtens være forskellige for to køreretninger af en bus osv.
AsgerFrank (2016-04-27 08:10:14+00:00): - jeg må indrømme at det er kun mine egne spekulationer om, hvad hvad public_transport=stop_position (på en node i en way) i almindelighed skal gøre godt for. For man kan da se med overpass-turbo at det fx i København bruges meget ved "noget på skinner". Andre steder ser stop_position og bus_stop til gengæld ikke ud til at være brugt rigtigt, mest ifm. busser.
Jeg syntes blot lige det ville være hjælpsomt at gøre opmærksom på problemet med på/ved-siden-af-way, nu du har kortlagt meget af busruterne.
Paul_012 (2016-12-30 10:58:49+00:00): I've reverted the change to the waterway=river tagging for Khlong Bangkok Yai. The waterway is the former course of the Chao Phraya River, and should be tagged accordingly.
HolgerJeromin (2015-06-08 13:36:19+00:00): Hier hast du leider den Haupttag leisure=adult_gaming_centre vergessen zu löschen. Hab ich aber gerade nachgeholt.
Peer van Daalen (2015-06-08 17:16:32+00:00): Ja! Danke! 

Ich wollte gestern auch den Neu-Eintrag im Tivoli fertig machen. Ist aber irgendwie nicht zustande gekommen. Hatte es mit einem ´Punkt´ versucht, weil der Tag "Spielbank" nicht angeboten wird. Aber es wurde nie etwas sichtbar. 

Hab gesehen, daß Du im Hintergrund den Eintrag gemacht hast, aber sichtbar! ist da immer noch nichts.

Gruß PvD
HolgerJeromin (2015-06-09 08:38:14+00:00): Ja, ich habe das Kasino und das Automatenspiel eingetragen. Ob es gerendert wird oder nicht ist egal. 
Wir mappen für die Datenbank und nicht für eine spezielle Darstellung. Casino kommt hoffentlich auch später auf der Standard-Karte. Aber das kommt nur, wenn man es auch nutzt. :-)
RoterEmil (2017-02-10 11:47:44+00:00): "Freakland"? Ist doch nicht wirklich ein Eigenname von dieser Fläche, oder?
zimba (2015-06-08 09:20:14+00:00): That street was already on the map. Please check if something already exists before you start mapping. Thanks.
eggie (2017-07-17 17:58:21+00:00): PB gestuurd met Alsnog Welkom
Plotti (2015-06-07 19:43:16+00:00): added path
mueschel (2019-12-22 17:05:47+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node? It's missing a tag describing what it is:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3579280512

Thanks!
harg (2019-12-22 20:51:28+00:00): Retagged more appropriately.
dudka (2015-06-08 11:41:46+00:00): Чому було перейменовано вулицю Котовського? 
http://syrets.com.ua/ - спорткомлекс Сирець - Котовського 4
http://school169.edukit.kiev.ua/kontakti/ - Школа 169 - Котовського 2
dudka (2015-06-08 11:42:41+00:00): Також можна звіритися з містобудівним кадастром Києва http://mkk.kga.gov.ua
Alexey Furashev (2015-06-09 15:29:38+00:00): - на табличках так вулиця позначена.
- офіційна адреса так позначена, див., http://syrets-dendropark.kiev.ua/ розділ "Контакти"
- напроти, знаходиться корпус II школи мерідіан (вул. Тираспільска, 43), http://mischool.com.ua/contacts
dudka (2015-06-10 08:09:49+00:00): відмінив переіменування звязку вулиці Котовського, включив будинки і дорогу, що знаходяться на захід від залізниці в звязок вулиці Тираспільської, виправив опечатку в назві вулиці Тираспільської, виправив "Нівки" на "Нивки".
trigpoint (2015-06-08 08:55:53+00:00): Hi, welcome to osm.
The driveway should be tagged as private , not removed. The point where it joins the B4570 is a useful navigation point.
4rch (2015-08-12 21:38:33+00:00): Diese Straße ist kein Feldweg, sondern eine Verbindungsstraße, die von der lokalen Bevölkerung rege mit dem Auto genutzt wird. Das weiß ich aus eigener Erfahrung.

Nicht alles ist gleich ein Feldweg, nur weil es nicht asphaltiert ist. Ich habe deine Änderungen rückgängig gemacht.

Gruß
Torkel (2015-08-16 18:28:28+00:00): Servus, ist doch schön wenn du es besser weißt. Also noch viel Spaß beim mappen und immer schön locker bleiben!
Gruß
Stereo (2015-06-07 21:25:17+00:00): Cool, thank you!
przemas75 (2016-08-31 10:10:29+00:00): Te odcinki:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352164839
To wyłącznie cycleway? Chodzić nie można po nim?
wojtas82 (2016-08-31 10:34:32+00:00): Poprawiłem na path. Poza tym to jakiś Bąbel robił ja tylko dodałem szlak. Nie zmieniałem nic praktycznie.
Hjart (2015-06-09 07:34:36+00:00): Bemærk at veje og stier ikke må overlappe hinanden. Jeg har måttet fikse et par tilfælde omkring Byagervej 334
Nico-dk (2015-06-09 14:09:10+00:00): Tak , men jeg kan ikke rigtig gennemskue historikken og se hvad du har gjort, og hva jeg gør forkert. Vej og sti skal vel hæftes sammen i et punkt ved enden ?
.
Hjart (2015-06-13 20:20:45+00:00): Helt korrekt. Det er ofte noget lettere at se hvad der er sket ved hjælp af Achavi: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=31801052, men i dette tilfælde hjælper selv ikke det så meget. Men grundlæggende var der et eksisterende stykke sti under det midterste stykke af den vej du tegnede. Dette stykke har jeg klippet væk.

Det her tilfælde er lidt komplekst og derfor lidt svært at forklare, men hvis bare du fremover har i baghovedet at alt highway=* ikke må overlappe hinanden, så går det nok.
Viajero Perdido (2015-06-07 22:11:03+00:00): Correction: source=survey, Bing
andygol (2015-06-08 06:32:08+00:00): Я, додав ці станції!
Дивіться уважніше на них є відповідний теґ 'construction=yes', що означає будівельні чи ремонтні роботи. Ваші жарти я відкотив. Будь ласка, в майбутньому ставитеся з повагою до інших учасників.
Husim (2015-06-08 08:09:53+00:00): Ок. Прошу прощения если обидел, но все же я думаю эти станции никогда не откроют.
Husim (2015-06-08 08:16:38+00:00): Кстати, удалил я их (точнее переименовал), потому как в одной из навигационных программ они отображаются, и ничем не отличаются от рабочих/существующих станций.
andygol (2015-06-08 08:20:53+00:00): Відкриють чи не відкриють - то таке… але вони є, тіко доступ до них мають не всі. Будемо сподіватись, що все ж їх відкриють.
PS Та я не ображаюсь ;)
Yorvik Prestigitator (2015-06-09 11:33:51+00:00): Has the building really become circular??
Endres Pelka (2015-06-14 06:52:05+00:00): What's this untagged way supposed to mean?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-24 09:22:47+00:00): Co to za droga? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/352060813 Śmiem twierdzić, że jej tam nie ma.
Drell (2015-07-24 22:58:47+00:00): Droga jak najbardziej istnieje. Stworzona przy okazji uzbrajania terenu w strefie aktywności gospodarczej. W mapach googla są aktualne zdjęcia lotnicze na potwierdzenie.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-07-24 23:04:24+00:00): Ok, dzięki za wyjaśnienie.
Pozdrawiam
eBin (2015-12-20 19:23:19+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/485881
5m4u9 (2015-06-11 06:24:16+00:00): Genial. Algunas cosas por aclarar:

* Árboles, el nombre se usa para cuando tiene uno, hay dos etiquetas que describen el género y especie (genus + species), es preferible dejarlo en una nota para averiguar bien. Ej: Bicente http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2312521262

*  Altura, no añadir altura porque esto varía cada vez, mejor utilizar edad.

* Edad, se utiliza "start_date" si se conoce exacto así -> 2008-02-01 (1 Feb 2008) o si es aproximado ~2008

* La etiqueta "amenity=car_parts" se usa para tiendas de partes o accesorios.
Escuela Primaria_Nro_1_DFSarmiento (2015-06-08 01:27:46+00:00): La Escuela Nro. 1 "D.F. Sarmiento" es el Establecimiento educativo más viejo del Distrito Colón, del mismo nombre del Partido de Colón. En la Pcia de Bs. As. con más de 130 años. 
School No. 1. "DF Sarmiento" is the oldest district of Colon, the same name of the Party of Columbus educational establishment. In the Province of Bs. As. With more than 130 years. In Argentina
rickmastfan67 (2015-06-08 04:48:50+00:00): Just so you know, we do not add the quadrant route numbers to ref tags.  Those routes do not get shields like the 'normal' state routes.  They should be tagged as: ' ref:penndot=SR 3016 ', not ' ref=SR 3016 '.  Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pennsylvania/State_Route_Relations#Four_digit_routes
MavEtJu (2015-06-08 03:16:37+00:00): Proper commit message: Fixed walk/bike access to Daragnan Close road.
mavl (2015-06-08 19:23:56+00:00): «Шиномонтажка» это настоящее название? Оно написано на здании? Если это не название, то его нужно удалить. Шиномонтаж обозначается тегами service=tyres +  shop=car_repair
mavl (2015-06-08 19:26:05+00:00): «гаражный кооператив» – это не имя/название. Удалено.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-10 18:37:44+00:00): Do you maybe remember your reasoning behind tagging shop types in this ancient edit?
If yes, can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2492978 ?
chnav (2015-06-19 06:07:19+00:00): Спасибо, я тоже офигел.
Víctor L (2015-06-20 19:19:33+00:00): La herramienta "simplificacar vías) no es para ser usada sobre una traza terminada, y mucho menos indiscriminadamente, sino que es para eliminar los nodos innecesarios durante el desarrollo de un track y así simplificar el trabajo. Su uso deliberado sólo arruina muchas horas de trabajo de otro usuario y puede ser tomado como un hecho de vandalismo.
tizzi (2015-06-23 02:40:59+00:00): primero que nada no use esa herramienta, segundo la mayor cantidad de nodos eliminados son los correspondientes a trazas de lanes que no deben ser dibujadas, tercero vandalismo podria ser tambien ponerle nombres a cosas que no corresponden, como acceso a rotonda salida de rotonda enlace con ruta nacional nº y demas cosas que solo perjudican la visual y entorpecen el ruteo cuando se cuenta con otros recursos y herramientas. Yo tambien dedico horas de trabajo y cualquier punto que quieras corregirme sabes que te he respondido y reconocido mis errores, pero de ahi a que mis aportes los pretendas tomar como vandalismo hay un largo camino.
AgusQui (2015-06-27 00:46:45+00:00): Tranca muchachos, ambos son grandes aportadores al mapa, no quiero que se vayan por peleas tontas.
AgusQui (2015-06-27 02:30:42+00:00): Si se van a pelear, que sea por acá: 
http://osmfight.neis-one.org/?u1=Victor%20L&u2=tizzi
;P
tizzi (2015-07-09 16:24:32+00:00): jaaja está todo tranqui agus, ya hablamos ;)

osmfight?? las cosas que inventan XD
archie (2015-06-08 16:42:30+00:00): Hej tomasy, vad gjorde jag för fel? Kollade och checkade och tyckte att det hade blivit rätt. Jag är intresserad av vad som blivit fel.
tomasy (2015-06-08 18:17:12+00:00): Jag höll på att fixa till bus 60 vid Rosenlund. När jag då tittade på relationen så låg bus-stop för Jungmarksgatan inte i rätt ordning (den låg först). Vidare så var det ett avbrott på sträckan vid hållplatsen vid Jungmarksgatan.
När jag nu kollar så borde man kunna slå ihop de 3 segmenten vid Jungmarksgatan till ett, alla har samma attribut.
mavl (2015-06-08 19:13:00+00:00): Избегайте сокращений в названиях и написания названий прописными буквами. Лучше:
name=ООО «Центр современных технологий «Лидер»;
также добавить тег office=company (офис компании).
mavl (2015-06-08 19:00:04+00:00): Здравствуйте.
В номерах домов пишут прописные буквы (например, 10Б).

Вы уверены, что это дом 10Б? Дом 10Б уже западнее этого дома.
mavl (2015-06-08 19:01:30+00:00): В смысле, 10Б уже есть западнее от этого дома.
mavl (2015-06-08 19:06:33+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Удаление тегов building со зданий и замена их на landuse называется порчей данных (или вандализмом). Не делайте так больше. Для магазина нужен тег shop. Для этого нужно знать, что продают в этом магазине. Что это за магазин «Магазин М»?
mavl (2015-06-08 18:53:12+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Необязательно добавлять тег addr:city=Ишим на каждый дом. Принадлежность дома к населённому пункту определяется по попаданию его в границы города.
DaxServer (2017-02-03 10:55:44+00:00): Hi Raj Kumar! I have no idea why you use the tags - full_id, osm_id and osm_type. I presume it was part of cleanup edits. Can you tell me more? Thanks!
BCNorwich (2015-06-10 05:53:05+00:00): Hello, with respect I think the outline of the Hilton is not the shape on the ground. Perhaps the last edit accidentally aligned the nodes of the main block into a circle. Regards
Tomáš Farkaš (2015-06-08 09:05:12+00:00): Pridane lesne cesty okolo VOP Novaky a cesta do obce Sutovce

Added paths around Novaky military base and path to Sutovce
Morten Lange (2016-01-17 01:16:11+00:00): Hæ ég lagaði uppsetningin á opnunartímarnir :-)
trigpoint (2015-06-08 16:57:17+00:00): Does this restaurant have a name?
trigpoint (2015-06-08 16:56:52+00:00): Hi Manik
This should probably be tagged as shop=shoes as well. 
Probably draw the building as shop=shoes and add the cafe node inside it.
d1g (2015-06-09 18:19:06+00:00): Удалять до сих пор существующие объекты после людей которые по 10-20 лет живут здесь отметили их - плохая идея.

По обмостке можно выйти только к подъезду: http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=31851714
hanchao (2015-06-11 02:22:31+00:00): 请不用乱改
Durko_freemap (2015-06-10 07:12:22+00:00): Zdravim Peter, vdaka za doplnenie, len myslim ze ten pravy koniec je napojeny tiez na tu hlavnu kostru(cestu). Keby ste sa v buducnosti potreboval poradit o tagovani mozete tu: https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=sk#!forum/osm_sk . Durko
SomeoneElse (2015-08-08 00:01:14+00:00): What's the signage on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/63610593/history ?  Currently it's "designation=open to all traffic" - that might mean that it's a "Byway Open to All Traffic" (BOAT), an Unclassified County Road (or however Staffs describe them), or something without a designation that other maps might mark as "Other route with public access".
FellRnr57 (2015-08-11 12:08:35+00:00): I can't remember the signage on the path, I will have to check again.  The definitive map (https://apps2.staffordshire.gov.uk/WEB/OnTheMap/RuralAccess) shows it as:
Name	Dilhorne 19
Status	BOAT
Start point	County road at Newhill
End point	County road, N.E. of Stonewalls.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-11 12:39:45+00:00): Thanks.  For completeness, the popularity of various designation keys in the UK is http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/keys/designation#values .  Obviously Staffs' website can't be used as a source for OSM (there's a big disclaimer at the bottom) but following confirmation by resurvey, if does sound like a http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org.uk/tags/designation=byway_open_to_all_traffic
lcat (2015-06-08 18:54:08+00:00): Здравствуйте!
А почему собственно service? Насколько я знаю, там нет никакого более-менее регулярного и осмысленного движения, эта грунтовка накатана рыбаками и отдыхающими
klinenok (2015-06-09 07:14:11+00:00): Да в принципе и в дачах та же накатанная дорога, сейчас подправлю
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-09 20:36:18+00:00): Co to za jakieś dziwne zmiany ulic?
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-06-09 21:52:55+00:00): Zapraszam na forum w celu ustalenia konsensusu: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=508503#p508503