piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
chachafish (2020-05-06 22:02:49+00:00): Okay, thanks. Just curious :)
phidauex (2020-05-06 23:20:33+00:00): Hi, before adding more buildings using this method you may want to look into the ongoing Denver building and address import project that is currently in progress and covers this area of Denver. The building trace quality is much higher than mapwithai, and it includes full address data.

Information on the import and how to participate if you'd like is here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Denver_Planimetrics_Import

And we also discuss in the #local-colorado channel of the OSM-US slack.

Thanks!
PhysicsArmature (2020-05-07 00:00:47+00:00): Thank You, sorry.
phidauex (2020-05-07 00:41:39+00:00): Nothing to be sorry about, thanks for your addition to the map! Just wanted to let you know about the other effort in case you are interested in participating. Happy mapping.
lolololololyttr556 (2020-05-12 11:42:29+00:00): #*#*+8+8+8+8+8#*#*
lolololololyttr556 (2020-05-12 11:43:38+00:00): #*#*$@&)95858&/_)*#*#
lolololololyttr556 (2020-05-12 11:43:45+00:00): 0013/SSASII-SC-95-045. T
lolololololyttr556 (2020-05-12 11:44:21+00:00): #*#*#*&+++0013/SSASII-SC-95-045 Y¥€*#*#*
lolololololyttr556 (2020-05-12 11:44:41+00:00): ##31#
skquinn (2020-08-07 10:20:48+00:00): Why did 88 Dunns Point Lane get tagged shop=yes?
blackboxlogic (2020-08-07 17:29:26+00:00): The state data had https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7483272934 with
PLACE_TYPE="Retail - Free Standing"
which I translated to shop. My manual review wasn't thorough enough to spot the inaccuracy, which I have now corrected in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89103408
In the future, you can use your best judgement and fix things like this.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84651042
user_8466505 (2020-09-13 09:11:03+00:00): Hello! Do you think you could add businesses to the Ala Moana Center in Honolulu? Thanks!
TheAdventurer64
user_5359 (2020-05-05 04:24:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please be careful when editing the map data. You moved the node https://www.osm.org/node/6212094949/history over 100 meters, so there were problems with the corresponding way. I have moved the point back to its original position.
jfd553 (2022-03-21 15:43:29+00:00): node 7483349378
emergency=fire_hydrant
water_source=main

Je suis passé là dernièrement et je n’ai pas vu de borne-fontaine. Certain de son existence ?
jfd553 (2022-03-21 15:47:01+00:00): Désolé, me suis trompé d'endroit. Il y a effectivement une borne-fontaine là où tu l'a mise ! Merci :-)
OSMWeekly (2020-05-05 00:43:24+00:00): source: Aerial Imagery.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:24:08+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
DressyPear4 (2020-07-13 23:33:26+00:00): Olá, a tag 'oneway' não deve ser adicionada em linhas de transmissão.
DressyPear4 (2020-06-29 23:55:38+00:00): Tag "oneway" não deve ser adicionada em linhas de transmissão.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84656176
Frans S (2020-06-27 07:57:51+00:00): Thank you for mapping 
A remark. You should note one thing. The instructions tell us to map all buildings individually. You mapped several neighbouring buildings as a single shape. This is not helpful in disaster response and preparedness when organizations on the ground want to visit every house or do damage assessment.
Best regards and keep mapping
TagaSanPedroAko (2020-05-05 06:17:16+00:00): Comment should be: "[Manila/Camanava area//Meycauayan, Bulacan] #BuildBuildBuild clean up for Tutuban Station, updates on Manila-Clark Railway and NLEX-SLEX Connector Road since end of Luzon-wide ECQ"
Frans S (2020-06-27 17:37:24+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here
About highways 
Please read the wiki how to map/tag highways
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa
You mapped unclassified highways , correct, then a track goiing of that road into the countryside where you mapped a few sideways and tagged them as unclassified. This is not logic.
A track is used for entree to farm- woodland. Unclassified as connection between hamlets etc.
Please check also the issue triangle on the right hand menu
You overlooked a few warnings
Best regards and keep mapping
Kovoschiz (2020-05-05 05:37:42+00:00): Please don't add these `name=`. Put them in `description:en=` if you really want to.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84662096
Logic_map (2020-10-06 11:01:18+00:00): 膜拜
Shaun das Schaf (2020-05-06 12:12:44+00:00): Halle Matzekieze,

willkommen auf OSM! Schön, dass du diesen noch nicht gemappten Ort mit in die Daten aufnimmst. Ein anonymer Nutzer hat bereits eine Kartennotiz dazu erstellt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2007222
Wenn du dieses Gebiet vollständig erfasst hast, kannst du diese Notiz gerne als erledigt markieren.

Mir ist zudem aufgefallen, dass du diese Treppe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/440653420 auf ganzer Länge sowohl als Treppe als auch als Brücke getaggt hast. Ich gehe mal stark davon aus, dass dies so nicht korrekt ist oder?

Bei Fragen komm gerne auf mich zurück.

Viele Grüße,
Shaun das Schaf
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-06-18 21:20:41+00:00): Greetings!
It looks like you've made a mistake when adding addr:housenumber tags.
E.g. you've assigned number "5505" to this building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/271922237), while the City Address data (as well as Google Street View) suggest that "5505" should be assigned to this building (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/800234986) -- numbers of other buildings on that side of the street were all shifted accordingly and need to be corrected.
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-06-19 13:49:49+00:00): upd: I've just corrected them
AndrewSnow (2020-06-23 01:52:11+00:00): Thank you for your QC contribution.  I've entered more than 30,000 addresses in SF by hand and doubtlessly there are errors.  Since the city's Enterprise Address system is often incorrect outside of residential areas, I field survey business districts using Vespucci, but rely on it in residential areas.  I obtained permission (and support) from SF Planning to reference their website at https://sfplanninggis.org/pim/, which is tied to the Enterprise Address database.  I have also found and reported errors it for incorporation in the Enterprise DB.  The area of your contribution is made doubly difficult because the Mapbox imported Lidar building outlines in the hilly areas of the city are often mispositioned by 15-20 m or more, and are often missing whole buildings as a result. I do my best to correct these as I go but the task is almost overwhelming in scope.  I would caution that you reference Google Streetview.  While the wiki is unsettled on this, the consensus in the forums is to rely strictly on Mapillary, Openstreetcam and Bing's Streetside as these entities provide for unrestricted use in OSM.  In SF, you will find my contributions to Mapillary second only to those of Mapbox.  All the best and thanks again.
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-06-23 03:58:48+00:00): Oh, nice! So, I guess, you'd be interested in the import of SF addresses. I've been working on it for a while and planning to share the results for review by OSM community with a couple of weeks (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=69771)
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-06-23 03:59:34+00:00): *within a couple of weeks
AndrewSnow (2020-06-23 22:47:38+00:00): I am actually on record as of 2015 raising objection to unguided imports of SF addresses - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Alan/diary/35341  Working essentially alone as I am, it may be slow going but I can't create the large scale havoc of an import.  I have spent an hour or more a day for nine years cleaning up the Tiger import mess. If one were to mix the errors in the SF Enterprise Address DB with the errors in the Mapbox building placements, it would leave an enormous mess.  I would truly need convincing to believe it would be otherwise.
Yury Yatsynovich (2020-06-24 13:44:22+00:00): That's nice. But, as the beginning of the discussion to this changeset shows, even the manual edits are not prone to errors. Besides, the import does some quality checks that allow to find the existing mistakes (that's how I found the ones in the current changeset)
Frans S (2020-05-06 13:35:56+00:00): Hello Sai20
Thanks for mapping.
A question. Were these buildings not proposed by RapiD?  You mapped 3 proposed buildings and 112 freehanded. From the last buildings you did not square 110 buildings with the Q key in the Editor.
Please don't forget that in future mappings
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84665531
Frans S (2020-05-06 13:35:57+00:00): Hello Sai20
Thanks for mapping.
A question. Were these buildings not proposed by RapiD?  You mapped 3 proposed buildings and 112 freehanded. From the last buildings you did not square 110 buildings with the Q key in the Editor.
Please don't forget that in future mappings
Best regards
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84665531
sai20 (2020-05-07 04:12:56+00:00): Hi, These buildings were not proposed by RapiD.  I have just started mapping and have missed the instruction on squaring using the Q key, will take care in the future.
Thanks
ma-rt-in (2020-05-06 06:01:43+00:00): Hallo,
was genau meinst du mit deinem Kommentar an Way: 800245992 ?
Des Weiteren ist es grundsätzlich gut, wenn man zu seinen Änderungen auch einen Kommentar hinterlässt.
vg
yadathot (2020-05-05 06:02:37+00:00): Deleted Residential Roads and driveway, Added Service Road as per Private Maxar imagery.
vrg (2020-05-05 09:54:34+00:00): Obiekt NIE ISTNIEJE!! Zgłaszałem już raz uwagę i błędnie utworzony teren budowy został usunięty. Budowa BTS Panattoni Park IV jest zaznaczony prawidłowo tuż obok, czy to jest niewidoczne ?? Budowana hala została już naniesiona zgodnie z pozwoleniem na budowę (na podstawie geoportalu portalu będzińskiego).
C2oc4 (2020-05-05 09:56:30+00:00): Szanowny Panie, proszę zauważyć, że nie zaznaczam budowy BTS.
vrg (2020-05-06 17:57:05+00:00): Usunięty obiekt nazwano Budowa BTS Panattoni Park Czeladź IV a ten jest już oznaczony i znajduje się obok. Niedawno Panattoni kupiło kolejną działkę pod Park V i to również jest już zaznaczone (bliżej hali JAS Fbg). Teren z tej dyskusji nadal jest na sprzedaż.
C2oc4 (2020-06-29 06:45:49+00:00): rozumiem
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:24:31+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:24:57+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
BCNorwich (2020-05-08 07:25:27+00:00): All Coop data placed on building rather than duplicating it with a POI
Yunkers (2020-05-08 19:41:41+00:00): Hej, dzięki, że to ogarnąłeś. Nie kojarzysz czy wokół przejścia dla pieszych na Konopnickiej nie powstała wysepka zwalniająca? Z tego co kojarzę taki był powód remontu, sam w okolicy jeszcze nie byłem, ale myślę, że dobrze byłoby oznaczyć.
Derbeth (2020-05-09 08:21:38+00:00): Nie znam dobrze okolicy, za dużo było nowych rzeczy, żebym wszystko zauważył. Nie dodałem wszystkich zmian rowerowych na Rynku i na Żwirki i Wigury, trzeba tam jeszcze popracować.
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:25:21+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
glibbertorsten (2020-05-05 08:16:13+00:00): Moin! Ich habe das vermehrte Ergänzen des tags "addr:state=Brandenburg" in Potsdam beobachtet. Du hast es hier entfernt - ist das denn falsch?
highflyer74 (2020-05-05 09:03:22+00:00): Moin Ihr zwei!

addr:state=* wird in Deutschland nicht genutzt, sondern im Prinzip nur in den USA und dort mit den entsprechenden Abkürzungen wie CA, FL usw. In Deutschland decken wir das über die Grenzrelationen der verschiedenen Verwaltungsebenen ab.

Viele Grüße!
highflyer74 (2020-05-05 09:04:46+00:00): Ergänzung: in Indien wohl auch noch.
Flurps (2020-07-29 19:44:30+00:00): Many of these new ways and tagging are incorrect.
Private driveways as residential roads? please be careful.
Faxalven (2020-07-30 19:57:58+00:00): Hi Flurps,
Thank you for reaching out. After reviewing my changeset, I located two ways (way 800272578 and way 800259114) which should have been classified as service, instead of residential. I’ve updated these two ways and I also updated similar classifications in this area to improve the consistency of service roads.
user_5359 (2020-05-05 15:25:11+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For a better description of the golf course have a look on https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course, please. Use ref instead of name.
Flurps (2020-06-29 14:34:37+00:00): Hi there,

A few of these 'service ways' you have tagged as residential roads. If you can't name a road, it's not going to be a residential road in CT/ZA.
ForestPark (2020-07-01 18:41:01+00:00): Hi Flurps,
Thank you for pointing this out. I was trying to follow the OSM Wiki’s guidance (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential) for using residential "on roads that are used for accessing residential areas”, as some of these unnamed roads provide access to multiple houses. I do now see that some of the other unnamed roads fit the service classification better, as they are providing access to single properties or appear to be shared driveways.
bagonzars (2020-05-05 06:56:51+00:00): Thanks for the contribution, Kindly square where you see buildings only
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84669962
Flurps (2020-07-29 21:40:52+00:00): These 'services ways' are single household  private driveways. You have also mapped private single house driveways as residential roads nearby.
PineBarrens (2020-07-30 18:56:01+00:00): Hello Flurps, I reviewed my work in this area and found a few cases that I’ve updated as service roads, added private access tags and a few gates where I found them from imagery. Thanks for reaching out about this.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/88748302#map=16/-33.9758/18.4804
Supaplex (2020-06-18 16:25:50+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
user_2066394 (2020-05-05 14:09:06+00:00): bei geschlossenen geschäften gerne ein lifecycle prefix dazugeben, dann bleibt der ort nachvollziehbar

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84671610
Glassman (2020-05-05 13:58:50+00:00): TIP: buildings can be moved by selecting the outline, right-click , select the move icon, then move the building so it doesn't overlap with another.

I went ahead and fixed it.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84672873
Nakaner-repair (2020-05-06 09:42:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84749950 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 84672981 because it I suspect it to be vandalism.
tastrax (2020-05-09 05:21:02+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
literan (2020-05-05 13:35:06+00:00): Добрый день. Вы опять ставите слово "улица" объекту, который таковой не является - ("улица Украина"). https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/602516710/history 

Это название автотрассы, полагаю. Исправьте, пожалуйста. Я правильно понимаю, что это автоматические правки и у вас работает какой-то робот?
iWowik (2020-05-06 08:23:46+00:00): Действительно, кто-то решил, что без кавычек красивее
mavl (2020-05-09 15:03:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84940553 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3685].
user_5359 (2020-05-05 15:24:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
RicoElectrico (2020-05-05 08:43:12+00:00): Cześć, popatrz w historię drogi:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/168424417/history

Numer był wcześniej oznaczony jako unsigned_ref (bo nry dróg powiatowych nie są zazwyczaj oznaczane w terenie tabliczką)

Patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:unsigned_ref
bxl-forever (2020-07-11 18:50:49+00:00): Hello,
Thanks for this.  I warned the user who made the faultly edit (that person had changed several tram tracks and added nonsense to the database).
JezCrow (2020-05-06 00:15:16+00:00): Hi TeessideMapper,
What on-the-ground evidence is there that 'Hartwell' exists as a suburb, and a suburb of where? I'm sure you're aware the wikipedia page for Hartwell was deleted due to lack of notability - and was subject to much edit-warring over naming prior to deletion - whereas most other areas of Stockton-on-Tees still retain their wiki pages. I note the later anonymous edit to the Hartburn wiki page to claim that Hartwell is part of Hartburn (a suburb of a suburb?) but named Queensgate, though what about Low Hartburn in between?
I hope you can clarify the situation.
Kind regards,
Jez
BCNorwich (2020-05-07 06:30:18+00:00): correction to spelling
user_2066394 (2020-05-11 22:04:47+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren, dann bleibt der ort nachvollziehbar
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/84675196
haavee (2020-05-13 18:36:40+00:00): Hallo Amadine, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2191787. Bitte immer die richte Lage von Hintergrundbildern anhand GPS-Spuren kontrollieren! Die 'Esri World Luftbilder (Clarity)' hat meiner Meinung nach eine bessere Lage als Bing.
Können Sie vielleicht die falschen Verschiebungen korrigieren?
kreuzschnabel (2020-05-16 20:59:31+00:00): Hallo Amadine, die betreffenden Änderungen werden im deutschen OSM-Forum gerade unter https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=69438 diskutiert, du kannst dich dort gern beteiligen, keiner wird dir den Kopf abreißen :) Das aktuelle Bing-Luftbild ist leider als Lagereferenz überhaupt nicht zu gebrauchen, es ist viel zu ungenau (teilweise 30 Meter und mehr daneben). Unsere genaueste Referenz sind immer GPS-Spuren vom Server. Mehr unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_verwenden .
user_5359 (2020-05-05 15:15:46+00:00): STOP making that mistake! 
Arrêtez de faire cette erreur ! 
Hello! You use sometimes the misspelled key buiding instead building. If you correct this please delete the misspelled key also. To find this key please use https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Tto 
Bonjour ! Vous utilisez parfois le terme mal orthographié de construction de clés au lieu de bâtiment. Si vous corrigez cette erreur, veuillez également supprimer la clé mal orthographiée. Pour trouver cette clé, veuillez utiliser https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Tto
mavl (2020-05-09 15:03:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84940553 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3685].
BCNorwich (2020-05-07 06:31:13+00:00): Correction to building tags
user_5359 (2020-05-05 15:15:51+00:00): STOP making that mistake! 
Arrêtez de faire cette erreur ! 
Hello! You use sometimes the misspelled key buiding instead building. If you correct this please delete the misspelled key also. To find this key please use https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Tto 
Bonjour ! Vous utilisez parfois le terme mal orthographié de construction de clés au lieu de bâtiment. Si vous corrigez cette erreur, veuillez également supprimer la clé mal orthographiée. Pour trouver cette clé, veuillez utiliser https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Tto
eggie (2020-05-05 09:13:40+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
DP24PH (2020-05-05 09:44:24+00:00): Complete PH-820 DPWH RNS data:
Toledo-Pinamungahan-Aloguinsan-Mantalongon Road, Toledo-Tabuelan-Sn Remigio Road, and Antonio y De Pio Highway