piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
user_85673 (2016-11-25 03:57:05+00:00): Hi nammala,
Certain counties come with driveways that are already in the TIGER data in the US. These driveways are frequently out of place, and are often for features that don't exist. Those are what I deleted.
nammala (2016-11-25 04:12:10+00:00): Thanks for getting back Bored.

Happy Mapping
jaap de vries (2016-11-24 09:24:27+00:00): Ik heb je poi kapperzaak even in het gebouw Dorpsstraat 57 gezet. Nu stond ie midden op de straat.
eggie (2017-09-22 07:57:46+00:00): Alsnog welkomstbericht gestuurd per PB
eggie (2017-10-28 19:11:55+00:00): Dag Geert, 
De kapperszaak heeft een andere postcode dan het zelfde BAG adres dat er naast staat. Dat zou nog aangepast kunnen worden. Hij heeft ook geen naam.
Moet de zaak niet op de BAG adresnode. Nu twee afwijkende adressen?
eggie (2017-10-28 19:25:32+00:00): Info naar BAG adresnode verplaatst. Verkeerde adres verwijderd. name= en website https://www.barbershop-wamel.nl/ toegevoegd.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
smaprs (2016-11-24 13:55:36+00:00): Você duplicou trechos da Transamazônica, fundiu tags anteriores existentes, os nomes estão escritos errado (Rodovia TransamazÃ´nica), duplicou os limites da relação de distrito (veja aqui em https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455149127 e o anterior https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/422119611.

Com que software fez isto?

Por favor, entre em contato logo para verificar estes problemas.
Junior_Prado (2016-11-24 14:43:30+00:00): Olá!

Utilizei o software Qgis 2.8.3 pra vetorizar e o Josm (#11223) pra submeter. Os dados utilizados foi do Bing Rod.
Talvez a codificação dos caracteres da tabela não estavam em UTF8, como o recomendado pelo OpenStreetMap.
Se preferirem, podem voltar como estava antes. Peço desculpas pelo transtorno. 

Desde já agradeço a compreensão.

Obrigado,

Junior
Lyubchenko Denis (2016-11-24 09:31:58+00:00): Сможете перенести поставленные POI на здания в которых они находятся. Так же в наименование необходимо добавлять реальные названия.
santamariense (2016-11-23 22:57:24+00:00): Olá. Bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap.
Quando editar o mapa, dê um nome útil que resuma o que você fez, e não "asdasda", vai ser útil para que outros mapeadores entendam o que você fez, bem como, para que você mesmo entenda futuramente.
Essa tua edição é no mínimo suspeita: Os objetos não tem nome, o único que tem se chama "teste". Você adicionou um refúgio de montanha no meio da cidade. Sem falar que você adicionou um hospital onde parece ser uma área residencial. Existe de fato um hospital neste local?
Enfim, esses locais realmente existem? Ou tudo era um teste?
Carpejani (2016-11-24 02:05:41+00:00): Serio, estou tentando aprender não sei como deletar isso :/
santamariense (2016-11-24 03:19:13+00:00): Temo aí pra ajudar. Ninguém nasceu sabendo, eu mesmo participo do projeto há quase 4 anos e não sei tudo. Vamos lá...
Pude perceber que você editou pelo Potlatch 2.
O site te dá 3 opções de editores, sendo os dois primeiros para editar usando o teu navegador de internet (http://i.imgur.com/TkTTns7.png).
O Potlatch está sendo substituído pelo ID, então, sugiro que faça edições pelo ID.
Para apagar os objetos, basta então escolher o editor ID ou Potlatch 2 para entrar no modo de edição, procurar pelos pontos que você criou, selecionar, e pressionar a tecla "Delete".
Como deletar objetos usando o ID: http://i.imgur.com/GkGvSLN.png
Como deletar objetos usando o Potlatch 2: http://i.imgur.com/dKUiSXO.png
Quando você estiver deletado todos os objetos criados no teste que você fez, não esqueça de salvar (save).
Tenta fazer aí, qualquer erro eu te ajudo.
Se ainda te restar dúvida, posso te ajudar, é só entrar em contato comigo pelo http://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/santamariense.
Boas contribuições.
kayle (2016-12-02 09:54:03+00:00): Hmm.. označenie "turistická atrakcia" http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:tourism%3Dattraction mi na toto moc nesedí
jeka p (2017-02-12 12:27:23+00:00): Hallo,
Chur ist auf keinem Schild hier zu sehen.
wieso hinzugefügt?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28567490

Dasselbe mit "Feldkirch" und "Götzis" bei destination:lanes:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28567492
Smiljan_02 (2017-02-13 10:09:51+00:00): Hallo, an der Abfahrt Hohenems steht eindeutig Chur am Vorwegweiser, siehe auch https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.382483&lng=9.676329&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=0aiyHuRaOC9R-vh2V57Z und für Feldkirch und Götzis siehe hier https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.386413&lng=9.677989&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=yd14Zp_SJwotP3QCMB1kSA .
Ich bin die Strecke die Strecke Ende Juli 2016 das letzte mal gefahren und da war die Beschilderung noch so wie bei mapillary dargestellt.

Senni
jeka p (2017-02-13 16:46:54+00:00): Hallo Senni,
ich fahre die Strecke Paar Mal pro Woche - die Schilder von Mapillary sind aktuell.
ich vermute, wir reden über unterschiedliche Schilder:)
Wie ich es kenne, für destination:lanes sind es solche Schilder zu benutzen:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.377853&lng=9.673289&z=17&pKey=aYH2RnmOUX3QDxz6yY1lqg&focus=photo
und für destination:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=47.376568&lng=9.671934&z=17&pKey=HjA4H9nawXpOL8d4PHVIZQ&focus=photo

Die Schilder, die ca. 500-1000m vor der Ausfahrt stehen, entsprechen oft nicht den Schilder, die kurz vor der Ausfahrt stehen.

Das 1. Link, das Du geschickt hast kann ich nicht öffnen...
Smiljan_02 (2017-02-15 10:09:53+00:00): Hallo,
auf dem ersten Bild ist Chur Weiß dargestellt,.
Chur war für mich eben wichtig und wenn ich mich richtig erinnere kommt an der Abfahrt Altach ja nochmal der Hinweis, schließlich muß man doch die schweizer Jahresvignette auch richtig ausnutzen.
Ich mappe meißt die Vorwegweiser, weil da mehr Angaben drauf sind wie auf diesen "Überkopf"-Schildern, ist aber Ansichtssache.
Mapp jetzt bitte nichts wieder um, ich weiß wo ich lang muß und wem es fehlt kann Chur ja wieder erfassen.

Senni
neuhausr (2016-11-29 18:44:05+00:00): curious what all these "zcolo-memphis" changesets are about--the ways all seem to be untagged. is it related to the map on this page? http://www.zayo.com/facilities/7620-appling-ctr/
CurlingMan13 (2024-10-08 23:01:48+00:00): No clue.  I recommend full reversion.
santamariense (2016-11-23 23:19:20+00:00): Olá, Bem vindo ao OpenStreetMap.
Você conhece esta região? Esta estrada se chama de fato Rua Floresta?
Segundo a camada do IBGE (print: http://i.imgur.com/b29CmfS.png), esta via se chamaria "Estrada do Rio Florestão". A camada do IBGE tem vários erros, mas mesmo assim fiquei curioso.
Michel Pires (2016-11-23 23:46:44+00:00): Olá, conheço sim, pois moro nessa região. No sistema dos correios está cadastrado como Rua Floresta com o CEP 23941010 (se quiser conferir), e se buscar por "Estrada do Rio Florestão" não se encontra nada, embora em vários outros mapas tbm esteja com o nome errado.

Espero ter sido claro :)
santamariense (2016-11-24 00:14:55+00:00): Certamente. Aconselho você a adicionar o CEP nos dados da rua, bem como adicionar  "Estrada do Rio Florestão", como um nome antigo.
É fácil. No modo de edição (http://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id&changeset=43906298#map=16/-22.9107/-44.3464), seleciona a rua e no lado esquerdo da tela, onde diz "todas as etiquetas", clique em + e adiciona as seguintes tags:
postal_code = 23941-010
old_name = Estrada do Rio Florestão

São informações que não aparecem diretamente no mapa online, mas que podem ser úteis em outras aplicações (como no caso da superfície que você adicionou a via).

Se você tiver smartphone, adiciona no teu celular o aplicativo OsmAnd ou o Maps.Me - Eles, dentre vários outros, usam os mapas aqui do OpenStreetMap.
Myazyk (2018-01-13 23:31:12+00:00): Якщо не знаєш місцевості, то не видаляй мої редагування. Тут ґрунтова дорога йде по ріці.
ff5722 (2016-11-24 09:34:43+00:00): Hello, thanks for helping to make the map in China more accessible for non Chinese speakers.
I just want to make you aware that the accepted tag for the Pinyin transcription is "name:zh_pinyin" (not "name:Pinyin"). Also, the Pinyin should be technically be written with tone marks, e.g. 'Zhāoyáng nán dàjiē'.
ff5722 (2016-11-24 09:35:29+00:00): Forgot to add the link. It is explained here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#China
Bernhard Schoof (2016-11-25 10:51:44+00:00): Hi, thanks for the remarks. I just wrote it,  as I found it on the street sign. I'm not familiar with the tone marks. So better I leave it off.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
muralito (2016-11-24 03:10:45+00:00): "Hoy Juega" is not a name, is "Today Lottery". Probably better mapped as shop=lottery
gjergjde (2017-01-14 14:28:08+00:00): Thank you for the edit of Skiatori. Unfortunately, the mountain lodge is little bit in at wrong position. Please check your data, compare with services like google
Correct coordinate 41.946100, 20.609846, see my edit with "Logo" . Best regards
Gjergj
skyper (2020-03-09 20:33:02+00:00): Hi
Ist https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455410932
nicht ein mini_roundabout mit befahrbarer Insel ?
Ciao
skyper (2020-03-09 20:36:54+00:00): Siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2115783
user_5359 (2016-11-24 16:39:18+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your node please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dattraction .
mavl (2017-01-19 15:24:52+00:00): Hello, David Reik.
You have written that your source of the data is Google Maps. The license OpenStreetMap does not allow to use copyrighted data.  
  
More information:  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ
  
Did you really use the data of Google?
SomeoneElse (2016-12-26 14:25:15+00:00): Hello,

You appear to be using Google Maps as a source on this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so please don't do this.

We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will need to remove data that's been added from Google. This may take some time, but please do be aware that features that you have added from Google will disappear.

If you have any questions please email the Data Working Group on data@osmfoundation.org .

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend
SomeoneElse (2017-01-19 14:13:34+00:00): Just to confirm - I've exchanged emails with the mapper here and they've confirmed that they didn't copy anything from Google Maps here.

Andy Townsend, on behalf of the DWG
Whereis_Cruicky (2016-11-24 05:21:14+00:00): Added Ferry route Name
dudka (2016-11-24 08:31:10+00:00): I've reverted your changeset. Please don't remove any objects without discussion with local community
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:55:47+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
nammala (2016-12-01 03:45:09+00:00): Hi astra2,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. May I know the reason behind adding these benches randomly which doesn't seem appropriate. It would be great if you can share how you added these data.

Ragards,
nammala
literan (2016-11-24 11:35:24+00:00): не совсем понимаю, зачем вы посередине зданий поставили tourism=information, еще и с названием разных флигелей и т.п. Этот тег - для указания на стенды, пункты информации для туристов, указатели. Наверное, вы что-то иное имели в виду? Может, tourism=attraction ?
mavl (2016-11-24 17:55:42+00:00): Здравствуйте. В этом пакете правок вы переименовали "Советскую улицу" в "улицу Советскую" в Медведево. В результате испортился адресный поиск домов по этой улице. Например, эти дома сейчас нельзя найти адресным поиском.  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433307915  
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433307909  
Я вернул прежнее название улицы.  
  
Улицы в OpenStreetMap в России называют в соответствии с соглашением. Если кратко, то "улица Пушкина", но "Пушкинская улица". Название "Советская улица" было правильным и нет причин для его изменения.  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:ВикиПроект_Россия/Соглашение_об_именовании_дорог
GerdP (2017-09-07 08:44:03+00:00): Hi! Please review:
You used the unusual taghighway=nonexistent
to map a way that no longer exists.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/399401575
Do you know if that path ever existed?
I think either was:highway=path or maybe
histioric:highway=path are feasable.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
vg17613 (2017-09-10 06:07:11+00:00): Thanks for the heads-up again. As far as I can tell the path did exist, the first few meters were visible when going uphill, however the rest was 100% overgrown.
Marcussacapuces91 (2017-05-06 08:30:28+00:00): Je te recommande plutôt
building=hangar
car aeorway... c'est pour un aéroport !
darkonus (2016-11-24 08:14:49+00:00): Пробачте що придираюсь) Старайтесь трохи акуратніше писати, бо вас важко зрозуміти.
user_5359 (2016-11-24 16:25:49+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Bei Adressen bitte auch mindestens den Straßennamen dazu schreiben: Alles anderes kann berechnet werden.
user_5359 (2016-11-24 16:27:38+00:00): Sorry: Sehe gerade, dass dies Gebäude in einem geschlossenen Gelände (Chemiepark) liegt. Dann ist aber ie Verwendung von addr:housenumber falsch, hier muss der Schlüssel ref verwendet werden.
Kai Wiering (2016-11-24 20:08:23+00:00): Okay habe es wieder gelöscht!!! Wie kann ich den die Gebäude Nr im Chemipark vergeben ?
user_5359 (2016-11-24 21:44:03+00:00): Sieh Dir mal die Hardthöhe an: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/147777087 ...
Supaplex (2016-11-24 09:14:59+00:00): 台泥蘇澳廠？
letihu (2016-12-11 12:15:37+00:00): Hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455463706/history
hast Du vermutlich vergessen zu tagen. Ergänze das doch bitte.
Supaplex (2016-11-24 09:20:32+00:00): There are a empty point and a leisure point already mapped as an area. Please fix otherwise will be revert.
PT-53 (2016-11-24 10:22:15+00:00): Hallo VDiekmann,
Du hast das Feuerwehrgerätehaus überarbeitet und gibst als Quelle für Deine Änderungen Bing aerial imagery an. Auf dem Bing-Luftbild (von 2012)  ist aber noch kein Anbau zu sehen.
Hast Du entsprechende Ortskenntnisse ?
Ist vorne, hinten und an der Seite angebaut worden ?
PT-53 (2016-11-24 10:15:56+00:00): Hallo VDiekmann,
herzlich willkommen bei OSM.

Du hast heute u.a. am Verbindungsweg von der Egelseestraße zur Im Sechzehntel zusätzliche Eingaben gemacht. Diese sind alle nicht erforderlich, da sie im Straßentyp path bereits "enthalten" sind.
Siehe 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath 
und 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath
Ich habe die Ergänzungen daher wieder gelöscht.

Grüße aus dem Landkreis BC
user_5359 (2016-11-24 16:53:43+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:15:59+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Alouette955 (2017-02-18 21:28:45+00:00): On Carrefour and Daniel-Johnson intersection there is no more links since major road building last summer. You certainly use older picture so please avoid recreatiing it. See change 46202416.
user_5359 (2016-11-24 17:05:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:16:27+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
Владимир К (2017-02-17 06:45:42+00:00): может быть обсудим то что вы хотели отметить и сделаем вместе всё в лучшем виде?
user_5359 (2016-11-24 17:06:02+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:17:02+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
friedl (2016-11-24 20:38:41+00:00): Hallo!
"access=no" ist vermutlich nicht ganz korrekt.
Falls hier eine Fahrverbotstafel steht (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vorschriftszeichen_1.svg) ist "vehicle=no" richtig.
Falls es ein Privatweg ist ("betreten verboten", ...) ist "access=private" richtig.
waldo555 (2016-11-25 06:07:22+00:00): ok danke fürs feedback - Dieser Straßenabschnitt ist mit einer Fahrverbotstafel beschildert UND mit Absperrungen abgeriegelt. Ist das dann ok so?
friedl (2016-11-25 09:39:40+00:00): Danke für die Antwort.
Wenn eine Absperrung da ist und die Nutzung mehr oder weniger komplett ausgeschlossen wird, ist es aus meiner Sicht ok.
Detaillierter geht's natürlich (nach belieben) immer - also mit "barrier=*", ...
rza31 (2016-11-30 12:58:53+00:00): Willkommen bei Openstreetmap,

ich habe die Öffnungszeiten beim Gesundheitszentrum ergänzt. 

Hilfe zum eintragen von Öffnungszeiten findest du hier https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours

rza31
user_5359 (2016-11-24 17:06:42+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-12-11 18:17:43+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
garethdenyer (2019-01-01 08:33:55+00:00): Although there is a way of navigating this section of the creek, there is not a formal track.  It is misleading to have this marked.
aharvey (2019-01-01 08:49:36+00:00): Hey Gareth, When I walked this 2 years ago there was a path along side the creek, but pretty overgrown so I made sure it was mapped as highway=path + trail_visibility=horrible (so people know only walk here if you're comfortable navigating in the bush where the path is easily lost with no guideposts or other track markers).

Has the path overgrown so much now that there's no longer a path at all?

What do you mean by a "formal" track?
garethdenyer (2019-01-02 09:45:15+00:00): HI Andrew...  Thanks for pointing out that you'd classified the state of the path as horrid... I didn't spot that, and you are right.   I must admit that I haven't done the track recently, although about 10 years ago a group of us used to do it regularly and really tidied it up so that it really was a route that was clear to follow.    I guess what I meant by 'formal' track was that to the untrained user who hasn't spotted the 'horrible' classification, it has equal standing to a very clear path.  A few of the apps that folk use seem to take their info from OpenStreetMap and so there is a chance that people could get into trouble.  On the flip side, the more folk that do this route, the clearer it will be :-). PS.  Checked out your brilliant web site... amazing!
Hjart (2016-11-24 10:58:01+00:00): Jeg har lavet lidt ændringer her. Bemærk bl.a. at hjemmesiden kan tilføjes.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-11-24 11:36:44+00:00): Proszę nie przyklejać obszarów do dróg! Co to za szalony pomysł?
mapper999 (2017-01-22 21:07:31+00:00): Hallo jhn69,
herzlich willkommen bei OSM!
Du hast in diesem Changeset die Hertzstraße zwischen Carl-Benz-Straße und Salinenstraße gelöscht.
Könntest du dir mal diese Note anschauen: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/857298 . Angeblich soll die Straße immer noch existieren, falls du dich hier auskennst oder öfters vorbeikommst, könntest du das mal prüfen.
Viele Grüße
mapper999
mueschel (2017-10-15 10:53:48+00:00): Hi,
could you please check these edits? E.g. I can't find this 200 meter long house on any satellite images. The street also seems to be in a different position. 
Thanks, Jan
trigpoint (2016-11-26 16:35:05+00:00): Is there really a toliet here, there is nothing visible on mapilary and it just seems unlikely.
vwJim (2016-11-27 00:47:17+00:00): Hi, yes its one of those small "pay toilets" that self clean etc. Ony slightly larger than a phone box.
trigpoint (2016-11-27 09:53:34+00:00): Thank you
jaap de vries (2016-11-25 07:34:09+00:00): Geert, deze school stond al aangegeven op de OSM kaart, ik heb je 2dubbele poi verwijderd.
Lees hier hoe je de kaart beter kan maken, liever niet werken met maps.me
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
Gumeg (2016-11-24 12:24:01+00:00): Пришлось сделать ориентировочный мультиполигон парка. Чуть-чуть подождали бы и я бы сам удалил.. А так - конфликт в Джосме.
Gumeg (2016-11-24 12:27:46+00:00): И по поводу точки - "You might possibly mark a very small park with a node, but even for small parks it is more useful to draw in an area." https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark
literan (2016-11-24 15:02:45+00:00): извиняюсь(( По поводу точки - но это же не very small park. Очень маленький это вот, наверное: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/55.75263/37.59732 .
Gumeg (2016-11-25 07:39:25+00:00): Извинения приняты. =) Я просто неторопливый мапер, пока нашел к пакету правок теги церквей, вы  опередили меня.. А парк.. Проложили освещенную дорожку со скамейками от жилого массива до озера по месту старой тропинки. Загнули по краям ещё две дорожки. Деревья только посажены мелкие, детская площадка с асфальтовым(!) покрытием свежая. Поэтому и границ то особо нет. Далее на этом поле опоры ЛЭП стоят, так что вряд ли этот парк дальше уйдет. Вот такой вот источник границ. Дорожки кривые замаплены по моим велотрекам.
Thundercel (2020-07-14 13:10:52+00:00): Pelo validador JOSM existem inumeros cruzamentos de edificações com vias. São muitos, mas como exemplo cito https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455488164
MicDK (2016-11-24 14:01:55+00:00): Vær venlig ikke hele tiden at ændre på u-vending tilladt fra de to venstresvingsbaner. Nu har jeg igen rettet det til, som det skal være. 

Jeg er lokalkendt, færdes jævnlig i det kryds, og tror du mig alligevel ikke, så kig på Google Maps.

Biler vender tit rundt jer for at komme over til busstoppesteder i de modsatte kørselsretning. Der er flere stoppesteder ved broen og opkørselsramperne til Sundbrovej.
Hjart (2016-11-24 22:24:06+00:00): Som jeg forsøgte at forklare dig, så troede jeg det var et uheld at du fik fjernet det ene "ben" på dem (som det ses af historikken: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6735956/history) og tilføjede det derfor igen. Derefter lod jeg dem være for at se om du ville få dem korrekt slettet, hvilket jeg nu kan se du har. Tak.