piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Djam (2022-10-31 21:31:10+00:00): Bonjour,

J'ai pu passer récemment sans problème par ce sentier.
Il est vrai que certains passages sont tellement étroits et indistincts des espaces privés qu'on a un peu l'impression de passer dans le jardin ou sur la terrasse des habitants, mais au vu du cadastre, je pense que c'est bien un chemin public. Je ne l'ai jamais vu clos, et quand bien même, certaines clôtures de pâturages sont franchissable par les randonneurs (j'y ai vu des ânes cet été)
Arnaud Champollion (2022-12-20 09:36:50+00:00): Le fait que le chemin soit officiellement public au cadastre n'est pas à prendre en considération (d'ailleurs le cadastre peut être faux, ce n'est qu'un document fiscal sans valeur de preuve).
C'est le terrain qui prime : si le chemin est concrètement d'accès public il faut l'indiquer comme tel, s'il est privatisé (barrière, panneau d'interdiction...) même à tort il faut l'indiquer privé (on cartographie le terrain, pas la législation).
Bien sûr si c'est injustement privatisé une action s'impose en mairie, mais c'est une autre histoire.
Je passerai voir à l'occasion sur le terrain.
Djam (2022-12-21 01:07:29+00:00): Je confirme (novembre 2022) que ça passe sans franchir de fil, de barrière, sans panneau "privé", ni réprimandes des riverains croisés :-)
Fort heureusement, car je n'ai pas trouvé la clé pour les cartographier :-D
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-20 22:27:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164453 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed/unsourced imports - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6271 and http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2398645 .
CurlingMan13 (2023-04-22 02:03:27+00:00): Did you not even check to see if the water was even valid here regarding this challenge?
aixbrick (2022-08-24 08:25:46+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier alle Wege entfernt, die auch Teil des Knotenpunktnetzes sind. Ist das irgendwo im Wiki so festgelegt? Wenn ich das nämlich stichprobenartig mit anderen Städten vergleiche, sind die Wege des KPN weiterhin auch Teil des Radverkehrsnetzes.
Gruß
Head (2022-08-24 20:46:43+00:00): Eine Festlegung finde ich nicht. Bevor es in AC Knotenpunkte gab, hat sich allerdings mal ein Mapper darüber beschwert, dass dies eine route-Relation ist, die aber nicht von A nach B führt. Diese Diskussion finde ich aber auf die Schnelle nicht mehr. Aber nach dieser Lehre sollten auch die hier noch übrigen Wege in Sub-Relationen aufgeteilt werden.

Ich fände es besser, Redundanz zu vermeiden. Wenn ways in Knotenpunkt-Routenrelationen und zusätzlich hier eingetragen sind, dann muss zwei Stellen nachpflegen, wenn sich vor Ort etwas ändert.

Wenn du zu einem Knotenpunkt fährst und dort auf die Landkarte guckst, siehst du rote ("Radroute im Knotenpunktsystem") und blaue Linien ("Übrige ausgeschilderte Routen"). Ich könnte mir das so vorstellen, dass die blauen in dieser Relation hier sind und die roten in der Relation "Knotenpunktnetzwerk Städteregion Aachen" (1747782).
aixbrick (2022-08-25 08:27:18+00:00): Das war wahrscheinlich die Diskussion in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112859210.
Ich hatte kürzlich die Knotenpunktrouten in eine eigene Relation verschoben (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14454746), weil der Relationstyp unterschiedlich ist. Man könnte natürlich auch die Routen in die der Städteregion packen, aber dann stimmt der Betreiber nicht.
Das Problem ist, dass die Relation "Radverkehrsnetz" nun Lücken hat (z.B. auf der Hörn). Würde eine Karte nur dieses Netz rendern, wäre der Nutzer wahrscheinlich irritiert ("Warum endet die Route denn hier?").
Ich kann deine Intention aber auch verstehen: Würde man nun alle Wege hier in diese Relation einfügen, platzt diese aus allen Nähten. Oder man beschränkt sich nur auf die Wege, die bereits vor dem KPN Teil des Radverkehrsnetzes waren.
trial (2022-12-30 22:46:07+00:00): Concernant les bacs à marée, soit ils sont différents de ceux sur le littoral (ailleurs) ce qui serait étonnant soit votre description n'est pas la bonne.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9775674365 me semble une bonne descrition. Votre/ton aivs ?
Lisapple (2022-12-31 03:13:41+00:00): Effectivement trial, j'avais repris les informations de node/9671606416 mais en regardant en détails sur bacamaree.fr, les informations ne sont pas adaptées voire manquantes (puisqu'il s'agit clairement de recyclage).
Ta description me semble bien plus pertinente.
trial (2022-12-31 10:14:20+00:00): OK, je vais reprendre les bac à marée (en fait c'est en cherchant à les homogénéiser que j'étais tombé sur celui-ci). Bon réveillon !
eggie (2022-08-19 06:22:06+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
Airfall (2022-08-19 00:20:27+00:00): https://www.strathcona.ca/business-and-development/development/growth-and-change-monitoring/2018-neighbourhood-profiles/
JoshuaOrais (2024-06-30 15:03:32+00:00): Please recheck buildings with irregular shape
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:35:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
nevw (2022-08-19 02:18:30+00:00): Hi
Can you shift Roam to the building in which it is located. It sits between two properties at the moment.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-20 15:38:38+00:00): Hi,

Why do you use level=-1 for waterways instead of layer=-1?
Skunkman56 (2022-08-20 19:05:47+00:00): Oops, got confused with bridges. Usually do waterways in ID editor, should have used the JOSM presets
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:34:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-19 10:23:24+00:00): The cycleway is now separated on Rue Boileau (since 2022). I will put it back as a separated highway=cycleway
Boff II (2022-08-19 19:49:39+00:00): WRONG

It is a TRACK all the way from Rue Victor to the small shopping center west of Curé Labelle.

DONT mess up with it.

Get on a bike and cycle rue Boilleau

Get a GPS and try to build a route with your mess...IMPOSSIBLE

This area is my playground for the last 40 yearsWRONG

It is a TRACK all the way from Rue Charles to the small shopping center west of Curé Labelle.

DONT mess up with it.

Get on a bike and cycle it

Get a GPS and try to build a route with your mess...IMPOSSIBLE

It is my playground for the last 40 years
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-20 19:55:16+00:00): First of all: please stay polite and explain yourself in a precise and clear manner.

Second: it is pretty clear in the wiki that if there is a separation between the road and the cycling path (curb, barrier, concrete or any physical separation), it is correct to map the cycleway separately. At this road segmetn on Rue Boileau between Saint-Michel and Curé-Labelle, there is indeed a curb separating the cuycling path to the road since 2022. Also, in the Montreal area, separating the cycleway from road when there is a curb this is the norm. I do not understand what you mean by "get a GPS and you will see it is impossible to route". Please explain the exact problem you get, the tool or app you are using. I do not want to get into an edit war here, but this should not be an exception. Mapping cycleway as separate way when it is not separated only by painted lane or flex posts helps caracterizing the crossing and it is quite useful when analyzing cycle path quality. If you want to change the way we do things, please ask on the mailing lists before removing hard work by fellow osm users/editors.
Boff II (2022-08-22 14:27:33+00:00): From the wiki page:

Cycle tracks

A cycle track is separated from the road by curbs, parking lots, grass verges, trees, bollards or another physical barrier, but is running parallel and next to the road. In North America this is called a protected bike lane, separated bike lane, bike path, greenway, green lane, or class I facility.

Note that a cycle track may alternatively be drawn as a separate way next to the road which is tagged as highway=cycleway[1]. Both methods each have their pros and cons. While adding a single tag to an existing way takes less time and still often describes the cycle track accurately, a separately tagged cycle way is generally more flexible and allows to capture more detail (note here that higher complexity increases the potential for routing errors). When mapping a cycle track as its own way, do not use any of the tags described below.

It is of paramount importance, to properly connect separately drawn cycle tracks to general roads and to other paths. This is both to reflect ground truth and to aid routing algorithms, which cannot 'understand' or take a chance on this by themselves, even though the distance might be less than a metre, or even if lines cross but the ways do not have merged nodes.

cycleway=track
This indicates a cycle track which is associated with a highway. As with cycle lanes, you can use cycleway:left=track and cycleway:right=track to indicate on which side of the road the track lies, relative to the direction in which the way was drawn in the editor.
cycleway=opposite_track
Use cycleway=opposite_track for a contraflow cycle track, that is, a cycle track travelling in the opposite direction to other traffic on a oneway=yes road.
Note: This value has some problems, see #Problems with opposite* values
Consider using the cycleway:left=opposite_track or cycleway:right=opposite_track tags instead, as this describes on which side the contraflow track is.
As the discussion on Talk:Key:cycleway:left shows, opposite* are no valid values for cycleway:left=* and cycleway:right=*.
Use oneway:bicycle=no together with cycleway:left=track and/or cycleway:right=track, instead.
These roads should normally also be tagged with oneway:bicycle=no.

Si vous tenez à utiliser highway=cycleway (separated track) alors vous devrez la faire correctement (selon vos habitudes) en utlisant crossing=cycleway pour CHACUNE DES ENTRÉES de garage de CHACUNE DES RÉSIDENCES de la Rue Boileau.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-22 14:47:15+00:00): Normalement, les entrées de garage ne sont pas considérées comme des crossing sauf si il y a une quantité non négligeable de véhicules qui y traversent. Dans notre façon de faire pour les trottoirs et pistes cyclables, on ajoute un crossing à toutes les allées de commerces et tous les driveways de bâtiments résidentiels de 4 stationnements et plus (sinon, ce serait beaucoup trop complexe à ajouter et gérer par la suite). Ça nous semble être un bon compromis. Pour ce qui est de la rue Boileau, j'ai ajouté la piste cyclable séparément jusqu'à la rue Saint-Michel en attendant de compléter le reste (je ne peux pas compléter tous les pistes cyclables d'un seul coup). C'est un work in progress. Aussi, il est très rare que j'oublie de connecter les pistes cycleables et trottoirs au reste du réseau car je sais très bien ce que cela peut provoquer comme problème lors du routage, mais cela peut arriver. À quel endroit la piste cyclable de la rue Boileau n'était pas connectée?
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-22 16:55:10+00:00): I completed the cycling path on Rue Boileau, from the train station to Curé-Labelle, so this should fix every problems you add with incorrect connections.
Boff II (2022-08-23 15:31:19+00:00): If you don't want me revert to my way of mapping the entire rue Boileau and part of rue Lapointe YOU MUST remap correctly (as it is on the terrain not as you think it is) the area around Place Hugo on rue Boileau and the "carrefour" Boileau, Lapointe, Curé Labelle.

By the way review the cycleway you mapped incorrectly on Grande-Côte from rue Landry in Saint-Eustache and rue Hector-Lanthier close to A 13 Autoroute (Chomedey) and a section also on Grande-Côte from Grande-Allée to rue Carignan in Boisbriand.
It would be a good idea to check all area you have remap...
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-23 15:36:09+00:00): Please explain what you mean by mapped incorrectly. The carrefour Boileau/Curé-Labelle/lapointe is new from 2022 and we don't have up to date aerial imagery, but there is a curb on street imageries from july 2022 so I mapped the cycleway separately. I would be happy to fix problems, but please be specific on what the error is. Thanks!
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-23 15:47:04+00:00): On Grande-Côte, I just mapped a small section between the A13 ramp and Avenue des Mille-Îles. The rest is not from me.
Boff II (2022-08-23 15:52:31+00:00): I don't have to explain.  To me it is obvious.  What you map should be found on the terrain and it DOES NOT.
If you are not shure what to do then DON'T do it meaning don't mess with it.
Go on location as I did and it will come out LOUD and CLEAR.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-23 15:55:26+00:00): On grande côte between Grande-Allée and Carignan, I did not complete this part yet. This is old data. I only completed from Carignan to the A15 (voie d'accès Curé-Boivin). Most of the time, if you select the path it will show that I changed it but it is just because I completed a segment that touches the old data. I added notes to these uncompleted segments.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-23 15:59:37+00:00): Most of the problems you mentioned are not from me... I cannot complete whole cycling paths in one go, this will take months to complete. Here is a map of the parts of roads I completed and validated: https://ibb.co/3cmTCz8
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-23 16:01:30+00:00): Parts in blue with green border are completed and validated. If you find a problem in these segments, I will be happy to fix them. If the error is outside these segments, the data is old data, not from me, or incomplete. Segments with dashed white border are planned to be validated and completed in the next months.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:33:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-09-15 15:32:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 126228183, 126229776, 126229784 where the changeset comment is: Reverting edits; see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6330 ; subsequent actions by that user suggest this data is likely fantasy.
ovruni (2022-08-19 01:24:34+00:00): Hola Fabiomodel, he notado que en algunos de sus conjuntos de cambios se han cambiado  nombres como "Jirón Francisco Morales Bermúdez" a "Calle Juan Velasco Alvarado", "Jirón Carlos Lecca" a "Calle Tres Fronteras", ademas de algunas denominaciones de vías. Sin embargo varios de estos nombres difieren de la base de datos del INEI, existe alguna fuente publica del gobierno que indique estas modificaciones?
Saludos
Fabiomodel (2022-08-23 12:54:00+00:00): CAPITULO III
DE LA CLASIFICACION DE VIAS Y AREAS
DE RECREACION PÚBLICA:
Calle. - Vía vehicular de servicio local, de
una o dos sendas, con una longitud de un
frente de manzana o cuadra.
ovruni (2022-08-23 15:00:44+00:00): Hola, puede indicar la url de la fuente donde indiquen estos nombres de calles?
Saludos
ovruni (2022-08-19 02:18:37+00:00): Hola, en este conjunto de cambios se han eliminado varias vías de fronteras de ambos países sin motivo aparente, por lo que he revertido el conjunto de cambios.
Saludos
5m4u9 (2022-08-20 00:43:29+00:00): Hola, en el mapa no añadimos "zonas", añadimos en su lugar barrios, subdistritos y distritos. Pienso que esta área que mencionas es en realidad un barrio, pero ya existe una hacia la max fernandez. No creo que haya repetidos..
lutz (2022-08-19 07:08:07+00:00): Hallo, habe den Eintrag wieder geändert, historic=exhibit wird in einer Karte ausgewertet und gerendert: 

https://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/l/de/index.html?zoom=19&lat=51.55671&lon=13.00972&select=n8911055980&pid=HaHbHcSaHe

Das Konzept exhibit als Hauptkey zu verwenden ist nicht sehr überzeugend, es gehen Informationen verloren, zb. exhibit=anchor.
PCarew_EG (2022-08-19 14:30:24+00:00): Hello, 
Thisis correcting the tag as mentioned in the OpenStreetMap Wiki. Please see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:historic#Possible_tagging_mistakes  
The historic key describes what something was, or if it has historic significance. The exhibit tag references the nature of the object on display - i.e. historic=anchor, exhibit=historic would be most appropriate given the information on the wiki. Thank you for your feedback.
SomeoneElse (2022-09-18 16:05:46+00:00): Just wondering - what procedure did you go through to descide the correct tagging for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4007660692/history ?  Did you survey the site yourself?
Best Regards,
Andy
UltimateRiff (2022-08-19 03:59:02+00:00): pipeline substance and operator are from survey too
iWowik (2022-08-19 07:25:26+00:00): День добрый!
Имена улиц пишутся без сокращений
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9962970792/history

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F/%D0%A1%D0%BE%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%88%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%BE%D0%B1_%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B8_%D0%B4%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B3#%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%BF%D0%B8%D1%81%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D1%83%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%BE%D0%B9_%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8
AkuAnakTimur (2022-08-19 04:10:48+00:00): Fat fingers and I prematurely uploaded my map changes with an incomplete comment. Should read " Amended street name based on user:kucai's on the ground observations"
pots253 (2022-08-19 04:40:31+00:00): Please refer to this https://vicroadsmaps.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=e8fa54687853433eb58e51584b36f681
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:23:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:19:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:41:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:52:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:43:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:52:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
user_2066394 (2022-08-28 15:34:29+00:00): http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/de/map/#zoom=16&lat=48.21876&lon=11.26607&item=9006&level=1%2C2%2C3&tags=&fixable=
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:35:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:55:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:24:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:57:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:53:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
JJIglesias (2022-08-19 06:42:57+00:00): Saludos.

Al crear edificaciones se requiere q las escuadres (Ortogonalices) para eso se marca la figura y se toca la letra Q, o con el click derecho del Mouse tocas la figurita q muestra un cuadrado.

Por favor visita https://learnosm.org
y
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Edificios

Gracias
JJ
catdreamer (2023-02-26 00:43:46+00:00): 請問這是那種告示牌？在name欄位的數字，會與里程碑標示相互干擾，難以辨識
iWowik (2022-08-19 08:43:24+00:00): Посёлок это не улица
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431364002/history
user_2066394 (2022-08-19 08:46:51+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1087392564
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7033737489
Auch hier redundant, die Eigenschaften liegen identisch auf Umriss und Knoten.
Josef73 (2022-09-19 15:36:04+00:00): Hello, can you check the value of the tag opening_hours? Thanks.