piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
gogorm (2022-10-01 17:51:05+00:00): What you did was sufficient to restore the connection - thanks for that.

However I have made further changes including removing the unnecessary parallel cycle tracks since there was already more suitable tagging present on the road. Also made a couple of other changes which are unrelated to yours.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126869133

I expect that when komoot and other's do their next periodic update of their OSM map data, the route planner will send cyclists going from Spawell to Tallaght village via Glenview Lawns.
pdelacy (2022-10-01 22:13:03+00:00): Great. Thanks for sorting it out properly.
rhtb0 (2022-10-02 11:34:26+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
eggie (2022-09-30 08:55:05+00:00): Dag Leon.. Kijk even in de wiki hoe je een name=  tag gebruikt. Niet iets beschrijven en dan name= gebruiken.
Je kunt wel description= gebruiken.
We krijgen anders een kaart met onterecht gebruikte namen.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-09-30 15:53:56+00:00): removed nametag = Speeltuin
.. rest onder description.
Gr eggie
Emey_Ender (2023-04-21 14:12:28+00:00): Hello, Prusaker. Could you please clarify, why did you delete Node: 7943252263?
Prusaker (2023-04-21 14:21:20+00:00): For such a long time, it is difficult for me to remember the reason. Most likely the point was deleted by mistake.
Should I restore this point?
"Качель Павла" - is an official name for swing?
Prusaker (2023-04-21 14:34:25+00:00): Is this swing located on a private lot? If this is not a public swing, then such elements are not drawn on the map according: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information
Emey_Ender (2023-04-21 22:52:54+00:00): In real world this swing is located outside of the private lot (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1099215273). It was built by a person who lived nearby, and anyone can use the swing, which is what happening in practice. Of course, it hasn't official name, but according to description in OSMWiki, tag "name" means "The main name of the object. Usually what people call it, not the full legal name" and in this small village the swing was called so - "Paul's swing". 
I think it's not worth restoring the node in the same place where it was. Because it will be in a private area that was mapped later than swing. I can map it a little further south. Thank you for your reply.
Prusaker (2023-04-25 19:07:54+00:00): Thanks a lot for the clarification. The point was indeed deleted by mistake. I will restore it a little south and add tags that allow public access. I'm sorry for the inconvenience.
bxl-forever (2022-09-30 11:24:32+00:00): Please use AIV Flanders GRB background to draw buildings, never trace on aerial imagery please.
eggie (2022-09-30 09:09:12+00:00): Hi Leon..

Please comment your attribution in English or French.

Greetz,
eggie
eggie (2022-09-30 09:12:54+00:00): typo  contributions
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:18:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Đuro Jiří (2022-09-30 09:07:21+00:00): *allineamenti
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:31:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Frans S (2022-09-30 15:19:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:* Pay more attention to accurate mapping over the rooflines. 
* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key. 

* Buildings partially hidden under trees not drawn correctly. Extrapolate the rooflines.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126813773
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
aceman444 (2023-06-02 22:30:08+00:00): Zdravim, podla coho tato zmena? Merci hotel je inde, v obci Kajal. Zda sa, aj podla webstranky, ze tu prevadzkuje restauraciu.
Patr1k_P (2023-06-04 15:36:31+00:00): zdravim to maju potom jednu web stranku pre restauraciu a hotel na roznych miestach, to som si najskor nevsimol, myslel som asi ze to je v jednom
aceman444 (2023-06-09 12:35:23+00:00): Ano, presne tak.
https://www.mercihotel.sk/restauracia/ (hned prva veta, je to vedla Samsungu),
pricom hotel je uplne inde:
https://www.mercihotel.sk/kontakt/

Dokonca v hoteli maju este druhu restauraciu.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:26:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
literan (2022-09-30 20:49:58+00:00): you duplicated the existing item: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12417772#map=15/55.7574/37.4916&layers=N
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Tommybara (2024-11-02 22:13:08+00:00): Please do not draw roads and bridges that are not yet under construction and tag them as highway=construction. Please either use highway=proposed, or wait until the construction actually begins.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
Robert Beasley (2022-10-01 15:05:22+00:00): 我不建议您在饶平境内新增任何M区，您可以视为一种地方保护主义。
敬告！
taihoku (2022-10-01 16:06:41+00:00): 建議你改用高德地圖可以避免這方面的困擾
請勿干涉，我編輯我國領土之活動
Robert Beasley (2022-10-02 03:11:01+00:00): 请您注意，这是饶平本地社群一同讨论的结果。
如果您执意要添加此要素，建议您实地考察，并向我们出示您有到访饶平本地的证据，而非模糊参考卫星图。我们欢迎的是100%详实的数据。
taihoku (2022-10-02 03:16:14+00:00): 沒經過中華民國地區全體成員同意之決議不予承認
taihoku (2022-10-02 03:18:42+00:00): 請具名身分證號碼證明為當地社群之決議。
taihoku (2022-10-02 03:20:02+00:00): 如不提供在地真實身分證明，本人將繼續潮州地區之軍事區域標記。
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
❤️‍🔥 (2022-09-30 10:21:29+00:00): Hi, ref:linz:topo50_id is currently used 86,000 times vs ref:linz:t50_fid is used 0 times - should we be consistent and pick one of the two? I think the former is slightly more descriptive

https://taginfo.osm.org/keys/ref:linz:topo50_id
https://taginfo.osm.org/keys/ref:linz:t50_fid
Richard332965 (2022-09-30 23:17:10+00:00): Thanks Kyle, fixed in #126843158
❤️‍🔥 (2022-10-01 03:32:11+00:00): awesome, thanks
Frans S (2022-09-30 11:58:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:

* Most buildings are strict rectangular. Please square them after you drawn it, and still selected, with the Q key.
* Nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/126814998
GinaroZ (2022-09-30 12:38:16+00:00): What is the evidence that these footways are shared use?
ntzm (2022-10-02 15:41:41+00:00): In person survey yesterday
ntzm (2022-10-02 15:42:36+00:00): Sorry, was thinking of a different changeset. it was from mapillary, you can see mixed use signs and paint on the pavement
GinaroZ (2022-10-02 18:36:10+00:00): Not on the pavement you added, the shared use bit stops here: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=918575715621153 - there's no signs between there and the roundabout, plus Sustrans/Fife Council have it mapped as an on-road section. Unless I've missed someone on mapillary?
ntzm (2022-10-05 11:23:07+00:00): You're right, I've reverted these changes
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:29:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:24:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:27:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
papapam (2022-10-04 11:27:04+00:00): Why did you remove the B1-D and B1-G references? That's their official references.
Claudius Henrichs (2022-10-11 12:31:28+00:00): Hi,
I cannot find these reference anywhere on stations, trains or the timetables at https://www.tcddtasimacilik.gov.tr/tren/baskentray-banliyo-treni/
Where did you get these directional route references from?
papapam (2022-10-11 13:16:01+00:00): The references are in Ankara's semi-official transportation app, AnkaraKart.

https://www.hizliresim.com/n63ztw7
Claudius Henrichs (2022-10-13 08:02:47+00:00): I see. Even the other metro lines have directional "-D" and "-G" suffixes. See the list in the line dropdown at:
https://www.ego.gov.tr/en/hareketsaatleri?hat_no=B1-D&kalkis=&varis=

Still confusing that this info is only found there and in the app, but not on the actual trains or signage on the stations. So following OSM's "on the ground" verifiability rule I would lean towards not putting those suffixes on the route relation.
Do you think it would be worth aligning all Ankara metro route reference tagging to that?
papapam (2022-10-14 17:28:17+00:00): You're right. I think it's better this way. Thanks.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:31:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:23:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:25:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:19:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:28:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:20:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:22:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:30:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-15 10:21:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127560988, 127562965 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert: undiscussed low quality import of buildings. Also this user has circumvented a previous block by creating new accounts.