piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Milancer (2020-12-28 20:22:18+00:00): Moc děkuji za reakci a opravu. Stejný problém je i u trati do Bochova, Štítů a Jevíčka, i tam je tuším zachována nákladní doprava, čili trať není nepoužívaná. Stejně tak železniční stanice (dopravny) které neslouží pro odbavení cestujících ale jen nákladu, nebo řízení dopravy jsou stále stanice používané, nikoliv nepoužívané (disused:railway=station), Vladislav, Droužkovice, Jarošov, atd...
Bilykralik16 (2020-12-29 12:49:35+00:00): Děkuji za upozornění, vyřešeno úpravou #96602286.
mice (2021-03-07 12:42:59+00:00): Ahoj, stále to ale není dobře. Tahle trať (a ani ostatní: Borohrádek - Holice, Štíty, Bochov, Oslavany - všude existují nákladní vlaky, byť třeba jen podle potřeby) nemají status vlečky, tudíž označit ji jako service=spur je chybné. Je to stále regionální trať (viz https://provoz.spravazeleznic.cz/PORTAL/Show.aspx?path=/Data/Mapy/kategorie.pdf), přestože na ní není provozována v současnosti osobní doprava.
Andrea Musuruane (2020-12-09 08:28:05+00:00): Ciao Giovanni. Nel convertire i GPX, hai lasciato le informazioni ele e time sui nodi. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95504362
gianfox (2020-12-11 16:37:37+00:00): Ciao Andrea, mi spiace dell'inconveniente ma non so come intervenire ora per ovviarlo. Mi puoi suggerire come intervenire?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95504362
Andrea Musuruane (2020-12-11 17:17:57+00:00): Ciao Giovanni, ho provato a sistemare io. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95504362
gianfox (2020-12-11 19:00:55+00:00): Ho visto, ma mi dici come si fa?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95504362
Andrea Musuruane (2020-12-11 19:18:40+00:00): Ciao Giovanni. È un po' lungo da scrivere, anche se non difficile. Posso spiegartelo all'incontro di sabato 19 dicembre (online)? Ciao, Andrea
Ltrlg (2020-12-08 18:13:07+00:00): Correction source : uniquement BDOrtho IGN (un bug de JOSM n'a pas permis de le modifier)
AgusQui (2020-12-08 23:03:18+00:00): En este caso iria railway=preserved, railway=rail se usa para vías operativas, recorda agregar operator=*
Russ (2020-12-09 18:45:17+00:00): Hi,

This change appears to incorrectly change several sections of railway line to be a tunnel, as well as deleting several railway platforms and sections of power infrastructure. I have reverted these changes.

Please let me know if you are having any problems using the openstreetmap editor.
PT-53 (2020-12-09 07:54:31+00:00): Hallo SuperFlomm,
die Hauptstraße in Mengen von secondary auf unclassified herabzustufen ist wohl etwas zu viel. Da gäbe es ja auch noch tertiary. Dies dürfte wohl eher dem tatsächlichen Verkehrsaufkommen entsprechen.
Grüße
SuperFlomm (2020-12-10 17:57:25+00:00): An tertiary hatte ich auch gedacht und habe zwischen tertiary und unclassified geschwankt.

Ich habe die Hauptstraße jetzt auf tertiary gesetzt und bei Gelegenheit noch ein paar andere Straßen auf unclassified hochgestuft.
RathcooleRambler (2020-12-10 12:35:58+00:00): The main road of a car park should still be listed as a service road.
CjMalone (2020-12-10 14:34:00+00:00): OK, thanks for catching this.

I think w626708212 is both a parking isle and service exit to the drive through. I guess because it's both the more generic (just service) takes priority? That makes sense.

w626708210 defiantly starts off as a service road, but I think I'd argue that it should be split at n5916451367 and it then becomes a parking isle. Would you be OK with me splitting there?
RathcooleRambler (2020-12-10 21:28:35+00:00): I considered that when I was looking at it myself, but I veered towards it being a service road rather than parking aisle. If you decide to change the section where it splits from the drivethru then I won't have any qualms, though.
CjMalone (2020-12-10 22:34:01+00:00): I'll leave it for a more local mapper decide, or one some better imagery becomes available.

Happy mapping
VJean (2021-04-06 12:14:13+00:00): нумерация домов из 2гис?
mavl (2021-05-22 10:35:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2020-12-24 23:30:43+00:00): mudanças revertidas, usuário deletando várias coisas
InfosReseaux (2021-02-17 23:43:20+00:00): Bonsoir et merci pour tous ces ajouts de lignes aériennes !
C'est super utile en ce moment pour un projet de référencement des poteaux

D'après ces indications, serait-ce possible d'ajouter operator=Enedis sur les poteaux et les lignes dans les communes concernées (la plupart dans la Manche) s'il vous plaît ?

Cela permettra aux objets d'être pris en compte sur https://enedis.openstreetmap.fr

Merci par avance !
François
InfosReseaux (2021-02-17 23:43:36+00:00): Avec les indications, c'est mieux : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Power_networks/France#R.C3.A9seaux_de_distribution
Betanyahoo (2020-12-17 20:30:24+00:00): Why are you edit-warring against the general consensus amongst the US community?
MikeN (2020-12-17 20:57:18+00:00): One reason for this change might have been that the previous edit was missing the protect_class, which results in the feature not showing at all.
RollTideRoll_asdfjkll (2020-12-17 21:13:14+00:00): That is correct, though other areas have the nature reserve tag also attached (for example see a few state parks in FL). for Red Mountain the park is owned by a nonprofit and not by the state. For state parks it should be like this https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9517835#map=15/34.7274/-86.5057 , that park in Huntsville has a national park boundary with an additional tag declaring it a state park (protection_title=State Park)
iandees (2020-12-08 20:39:57+00:00): Hello! It looks like you're importing data from another provider. Please stop doing that, as you're creating data that doesn't make sense in OSM. We're happy to help, though, if you reach out on Slack (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) or in the talk-us mailing list (https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us).
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95509081
adamh (2020-12-15 06:10:09+00:00): I have reverted most of the changes in this changeset.
These are all dedicated foot paths, and not for bicycles.
Dave Venables (2020-12-08 20:18:01+00:00): Is the Murugan Store in the same place as Shop Smart was https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5892809167 ?
If so we can delete Shop Smart to make you more visible
Dave Venables (2020-12-09 12:50:02+00:00): Following clarification have artificially increased the separation to make both Shop Smart and Murugan Store visible  on Open Street Map https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95554241
Both appear when searching and viewing the standard map but it may take some time before third party applications show the new details.
totera (2020-12-10 05:47:08+00:00): Qui invece non ci siamo proprio con la segnaletica già presente, da qualche mese sono comparsi cartelli col 6 in questo punto: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6490100586
quindi il percorso è tutt'altro.
datamongers (2020-12-18 00:54:04+00:00): Please educate me on why this node belongs here. There is not currently an airport here(at least something i would consider an airport, but maybe i dont know what an airport is) and there hasn't been in at least 7 years. I deleted the runway that you added here, and then you added this node without commenting on my changeset.
GreenRunner0 (2020-12-18 01:02:47+00:00): The runway is not clear, so I'm fine with that staying gone but the airport is still actively registered with the FAA (FAA LID: 4MT9) at these coordinates since 2016 and it is shown on FAA sectional charts. There are a lot of rural airfields that lack traditional features seen at public airports but are registered airport nonetheless.
datamongers (2020-12-18 21:36:53+00:00): Exists in faa database, but no longer exists on the ground, that seems like it should be `aeroway:historic=aerodrome`.
GreenRunner0 (2020-12-18 21:52:32+00:00): Nah, I think that's more appropriate for nodes of airfields that have become de-registered (read: no longer have an active listing in the FAA database); you'll often find these with GNIS feature IDs with the trailing epithet of "(historic)".
datamongers (2020-12-18 21:56:56+00:00): How about we agree to disagree, but since this is almost in my yard, you let me win?
Diacritic (2022-01-16 11:08:35+00:00): Partial Revert of boundary nodes in (116209290), see 93359799 comment
5m4u9 (2020-12-09 04:38:56+00:00): quitando porque añades como cascada
slowtux (2020-12-09 17:33:07+00:00): Müsste der postcode nicht  28209 statt 28211.
Die Objecte liegen doch alle im 28209 Postleitzahlgebiet. Auch die umgebenen addr:postcode lauten 28209

mfg
Gregor
Rainero (2020-12-10 15:28:43+00:00): Oh ja, warum habe ich da 28211 getippt, keine Ahnung. 
Hab's korrigiert.
Viele Grüße,
Rainer
andershl (2025-09-29 09:39:22+00:00): The upper part of Store Midsommersø is officially another lake, Baggården. I dropped the name on it and made a partition line, but no attempt to edit the existing multipolygon.
pikappa79 (2025-10-06 10:16:00+00:00): Hello! Thanks! I fixed the multipolygon
andershl (2025-10-06 11:40:54+00:00): My thanks. I merged in my free-flowing name point :-)
dvdhoven (2020-12-09 06:46:04+00:00): In idit soort gevallen kun je beter de bestaande wegen op construction zetten ipv ze te verwijderen.
Er zijn fiets- en wandelroutes onderbroken, cq verwijderd.
Ik heb aan de noordkant weer een stoep ingetekend, de panden daar, zullen hoe dan ook bereikbaar moeten blijven. Over die stoep heb ik het wandelnetwerk hersteld. Dus aub die stoep niet opnieuw verwijderen.
Het fietsknooppuntnetwerk en de LF route heb ik omgelegd, maar het ligt ook op de op construction staande Oosterlaan.,
Zowiezo is ID eigenlijk niet een tool waarmee je dit soort grote klussen kunt doen. Dat kan beter met JOSM

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
user_8898764 (2020-12-09 09:42:44+00:00): Hoi Dick,
Dank je voor de feedback en aanvulling. Ik heb geen ervaring met fietsroutes en wandelroutes, dus goed dat je dat aanvult.
Dat voetpad ligt er nu niet, maar over een paar weken wel weer. Er stond op de kaart een fietspad, dat had ik beter om kunnen zetten naar dit voetpad.
Ik zie dat de netwerken werken met relations. Daar heb ik nog nooit veel mee gedaan :) Ik zal daar voortaan beter mee oppassen.
zuicz (2020-12-12 20:49:49+00:00): Czemu dwie drogi jednocześnie w budowie?
zuicz (2020-12-12 20:52:55+00:00): Który przebieg jest zgodny z projektem?
Nalak57 (2020-12-13 17:12:12+00:00): Ten zaktualizowany zmianą 95513434
Nie udało mi się usunąć starej wersji
user_5359 (2020-12-09 05:33:12+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo: the key is surface instead suface.
DRM150 (2020-12-09 16:23:58+00:00): The surface has been updated. Thank you.
letihu (2021-02-08 19:32:38+00:00): Bist du sicher, das dieses Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/100464167/history
rund ist?
Die Dachform "roofshape hipped" passt so jedenfalls nicht.
Strubbl (2021-02-08 19:43:10+00:00): Hi letihu, ich habe die Dachform nciht eingetragen, sondern nur die Verbindung mit wikidata gemacht.
Frage mal https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/!i! nach dem CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67405744
letihu (2021-02-10 12:37:25+00:00): Ok, ich habe die runde Form des Gebäudes wieder nach Luftbild geändert.
Strubbl (2021-02-10 13:51:50+00:00): Danke dir, das finde ich gut. Denn auf keinem der Luftbilder ist mehr ein rundes Gebäude zu sehen. Vielleicht war das früher mal so.
TravGW (2020-12-10 16:50:23+00:00): Hello there! Welcome to Corpus. I've got some tips for you. When adding a road that is covered by a build/overhang, do not use layer=-1. Instead split the road where it intersects the building. Then add covered=yes to the part covered by the building. Example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/883297502#map=19/27.81950/-97.39014
nevw (2020-12-09 03:09:01+00:00): Hi Jamie
I removed the 'Home' you entered as it is a public map and not for private details.
The way to map a house is to use one of the editors under the 'Edit' button at the top left and add tags similar to those in this example
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/371575980#map=19/-27.67742/153.18080
Most try the iD editor first after do the intro to editing.
There is a new Potlatch 3 editor in final development so that is worth using when released. Discussion with the developer here https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=60263&p=2 
The JOSM editor is the most able and comprehensive and takes more effort to learn.
While you at it you might like to add all the houses and addresses of your neighbors but be careful...mapping can be addictive  :)
wille (2021-01-29 19:46:01+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Fiz algumas correções em sua edição, pois você deletou erroneamente algumas vias. Por favor, escreva nomes de ruas sem abreviações.
Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95515502
lyctkel (2022-06-25 16:22:52+00:00): 
Hi kbrayshaw,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171474869 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171473514 which uses building=townhomes.
This tag is only used here.
From my point of view building=townhouse, terrace or house would fit better.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Abuilding for details.
Regards,
lyctkel
Vinber-Pro (2020-12-09 06:07:28+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap,
it's a good practice to edit only local areas and not all over the world like this edit.
This update will be seen by many people all over the world !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95516151
limes11 (2020-12-09 08:17:15+00:00): Hello Noah Catterall,

and welcome to OSM. Please watch out not to perform updates in London and Australia in the same changeset. It creates a huge changeset box containing half of the world. Also, the object you added in Australia needs some attributes. Just a name is not enough.

Enjoy OSM!

Best, Limes
DP24PH (2020-12-10 06:02:31+00:00): Addendum from the last comment:
Oops! You may have encroached the Republic of the Philippines, and for your next editing, kindly separate your editing in a per country/area basis (unless international ferry routing). Always remember that in every mapping session, be safe, be well, stay sane and dry, and you are loved.

Truly,


DP24
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-25 08:54:02+00:00): Hello JLOSM, with this changeset you added the tag surface=unp to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/807380898. Is this just a mistake and should mean "unpaved"? If not, was does it mean? Cheers
JLOSM (2020-12-25 09:37:55+00:00): Hi Ze0zohk1, the label really is "Unpaved". When writing this tag, unfortunately the name was incomplete. It has already been corrected, thanks for noticing and letting me know.
Ze0zohk1 (2020-12-25 10:41:16+00:00): Hey JLOSM, thanks for correcting this! Cheers
SomeoneElse (2020-12-09 01:28:55+00:00): (actually - OS OpenData StreetView, not survey)
dónal (2020-12-09 01:10:48+00:00): correction: fixing issues identified by osm inspector (mostly access restrictions on roads).
Gustavo22Soares (2020-12-10 13:08:54+00:00): obrigado pelas melhorias, fico feliz em mais um mapeador em Timon!
Supaplex (2021-04-17 05:58:40+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
5m4u9 (2020-12-09 04:47:21+00:00): hola, en general para Bolivia utilizamos la imagen satelital Bing como referencia, por se más ajustada a la realidad sin distorsiones. Alinear el dibujo de calles es el primer paso.

Si quieres ver cosas más actuales en otras imagenes como MAXAR o ESRI, debes ajustar el desplazamiento con la opción de la derecha (capas → offset). Esto hay que hacerlo cada vez que vas hacia arriba de la ladera, es trabajoso y riesgoso. Otra opción es guiarse por las trazas GPS subidas, pero en varios lugares de La Paz no hay mucho y no hay mucho quien colabore :(

Las imagenes de MAXAR/ESRI tienen deformaciones en los caminos porque creo que el satélite esta a 45° y hay saltos. Son imágenes más modernos pero con errores

ESRI creo que en La Paz tiene mejores imágenes
clay_c (2020-12-18 19:11:34+00:00): Hi greenorangeparrot,

Looks like you changed the public_transport=stop_position nodes at the Charlottesville Amtrak station to public_transport=platform. Was this intentional? I'm going to go ahead and revert those nodes, though let me know if there was a reason behind that.

-Clay
greenorangeparrot (2020-12-19 01:17:47+00:00): Awesome, I think that was by mistake. Thanks for taking that on!
DUGA (2021-03-25 02:53:04+00:00): Hmm....

Isn't it unsigned_ref?
VJean (2021-04-06 08:51:02+00:00): Что за вандализм с названиями улиц?
mavl (2021-05-22 11:17:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Miguel Pedr (2020-12-16 10:44:16+00:00): Hola,
Realmente aprecio la valiosa adición a los datos de los mapas, pero la adición debe estar libre de errores.Aquí ha agregado las formas de servicio en la industria, lo cual es bueno, pero el público normal no puede acceder al área industrial cuando cree servicios en el área privada, asegúrese de agregar acceso. etiquetas que serán realmente buenas. Revise el área y realice los cambios necesarios.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/95526316
FoaiMNTN (2020-12-17 00:55:20+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thank you for the appreciation and providing your suggestion. Without any ground imagery here, I can’t confirm the exact access type, so I didn’t want to assume any additional access tags without proof. Some roads, like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882631677, also appear to be open to the public, so I thought it would be best to leave the roads here as default service.
Traducción:
Hola Miguel Pedr, Gracias por el agradecimiento y brindarnos tu sugerencia. Sin ninguna imagen terrestre aquí, no puedo confirmar el tipo de acceso exacto, por lo que no quería asumir ninguna etiqueta de acceso adicional sin prueba. Algunas carreteras, como https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882631677, también parecen estar abiertas al público, así que pensé que sería mejor dejar las carreteras aquí como servicio predeterminado.
Jez Nicholson (2020-12-16 14:39:10+00:00): It's the footpath/sidewalk
Jez Nicholson (2020-12-16 14:44:00+00:00): Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/95948200
prddym (2020-12-24 06:18:24+00:00): Hi Nicholson,
I have added service road based on Bing aerial imagery. However, it makes sense that the path looks narrow to be accessed by vehicles. Thanks for improving my edit based on local knowledge. Always Happy to learn from community.
Regards,
Siri
user_7130456 (2021-01-23 05:56:37+00:00): 你把沙漠改成水干嘛？有病？
user_7130456 (2021-01-23 06:03:27+00:00): 服了，你还把森林也改成水体，出不了图就跑来改原始数据你也是牛逼
Negreheb (2020-12-10 08:38:33+00:00): Servus beautifulplaces, hier ebenfalls, hier hast du den Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/154203193 in Version 6 gelöscht und statt dessen neu eingezeichnet mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/882649161 - gibt es dafür einen bestimmten Grund?
Liebe Grüße
user_7581226 (2020-12-20 13:23:47+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis,
ich arbeite in OpenStreetMap nach den OSM Wiki Empfehlungen, und versuche die Edit Historie daher so gut es mir nur irgendwie möglich ist zu erhalten. Natürlich passieren aber auch mir gelegentlich Fehler. Ich bewundere Deinen Einsatz meine komplette Mitwirkung in OpenStreetMap nach Ungereimtheiten zu durchforsten. Vielleicht wäre aber Deine Energie doch besser in eigenen Mitwirkung in OpenStreetMap investiert, denn ich stelle gerade im Umfeld der Stadt Salzburg, wo du offenkundig primär selbst an OSM mitwirkst besonders große Lücken in OpenStreetMap fest. https://yosmhm.neis-one.org/?zoom=13&lat=47.78635&lon=13.06858&layers=B00TTF&u=Negreheb wie ist das nur möglich. Grüße Johann
Negreheb (2020-12-20 13:35:46+00:00): Okay, du ignorierst also meine angesprochene Fehler und behauptest etwas komplett anders, wie üblich.
TravGW (2020-12-09 15:11:06+00:00): I noticed you changed a service road to a track. You’re not entirely wrong. The wiki for highway=track does say, “This tag represents roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc.; often unpaved (unsealed) but may apply to paved tracks as well, that are suitable for two-track vehicles, such as tractors or jeeps.” However it also says, “Roads which provide access to a specific property, such as residential driveways or industrial access roads, should be tagged highway=service or a higher road class.” Based on this latter statement I have been tagging roads which lead to oil wells, storage tanks, other industrial locations as driveways (highway=service, service=driveway, access=private) or at the very least just a service road.
siddhaam (2020-12-10 09:26:09+00:00): Hi, 
Thank you for reviewing the edit and the information about the area. I've made the necessary changes according to your information under changeset(# 95603723). We have already informed our editors regarding this issue, we will make sure this won't happen again. Please let us know in case of issues/concerns with our edits we will fix them earliest.
Regards,
siddhaam
Dimacn (2020-12-09 08:07:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. Спасибо вам за уточнение карты Абакана. Одно уточнение, пожалуйста, используйте спутниковые снимки Esri или Maxar - они более новые (в отличие от Bing , которыми вы пользуетесь). Вследствие этого, у вас переход получился не совсем там где он отмечен - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/869112361  Переход который вы удалили был ближе к перекрёстку и он был точнее.
aixbrick (2020-12-09 11:58:09+00:00): Hello,
your changes don't comply with reality. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/690597476 is not part of the crossing, it has its own junction, i.e. you can't drive straight through to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35046419. Please have a look on your used ESRI images where this is visible.
Regards
ErraticThunder (2020-12-09 16:27:04+00:00): thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have missed checking the esri imagery . thanks for improvising our edits with the local knowledge. going forward, i will be very cautious while modifying the existing geometry. thanks for your suggestions. always happy to learn from the community.
Regards 
asnghpi
aixbrick (2020-12-09 17:50:56+00:00): So, you "missed checking the esri imagery" while the changeset states "imagery_used" = "EsriWorldImagery".
Whatever, the changeset has been reverted by another user.
0000FF berries (2020-12-09 22:15:45+00:00): καλησπέρα :) Σου γράφω επειδή ζήτησες review. Πρώτ' απ' όλα να σαι καλά που πρόσθεσες το όνομα του δρόμου. Θα πρότεινα να βάλεις στο "name" το όνομα στα ελληνικά, και να αφαιρέσεις το name:el, μιας και δεν το χρησιμοποιούμε συνήθως στην Ελλάδα. Το int_name το έχεις μια χαρά :) Αυτό που δεν κατάλαβα είναι το layer=-1 .. τι ακριβώς πληροφορία θες να προσθέσεις..; (https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:layer ) Αν έχεις απορίες μπορείς να ρωτήσεις και εμένα και στο φόρουμ https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=27 :)
DUGA (2021-03-09 04:48:28+00:00): I don't think this link obeying traffic law.