piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-12-27 07:18:23+00:00): Moin hotteliene,

du hast den Verlauf der Straße "Vor dem Balken" in Honerdingen angepasst (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/170970059). Die Straße macht ein Knick. Du hast aus dem Knick eine Kurve gemacht, die es meiner Meinung nach so nicht gibt. Nur die Innenecke ist abgerundet. Der Schattenwurf auf den neuen Bing-Bildern verwirrt hier etwas.

Wäre es für Dich OK, wenn ich aus dem Kurvenverlauf wieder ein "Knick" mache?

Gruß Roger Wilco
hotteliene (2021-01-05 20:48:36+00:00): Hallo Roger,
ich hoffe, Du bist gut in das neue Jahr gekommen!
Du hast mich angeschrieben, weil ich die von  Dir eingetragene Straßenverlauf angepasst hatte.
Mir ist es wichtig, in OSM die Führung der Fahrspur zu dokumentieren und nicht ausschließlich die straßenbaulichen Gegebenheiten. Wobei in dem von mir veränderten Eintrag, auch die Straßenführung im Bogen verläuft.
Deshalb habe ich den Eintrag in Bogenform vorgenommen und an GPS-Spuren angepasst.

Herzliche Grüße
Hotteline
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-01-06 10:56:39+00:00): Hallo Hotteline,

frohes neues Jahr! Und zunächst einmal herzlichen Dank für Deine wertvollen Mapillary-Aufnahmen hier in der Gegend!

Ich denke es ist Konsens, dass die hw-Linie die Mittellinie der Straße darstellen soll. Ich denke, die ursprüngliche Version von Heideammer ist richtig bzw. besser (rechter Winkel). Erst recht, wenn man die Grundstückszufahrt hinzufügt, so stellt eine T-Kreuzung die Realität am besten dar.
Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
PT-53 (2021-01-06 11:18:01+00:00): Hallo,
ich finde die "Kurven-Lösung" von hotteline besser. Da fährt doch keiner einen "rechten Winkel"!
Grüße und ein Gutes neues Jahr
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-01-06 11:22:32+00:00): Natürlich nicht, aber wir mappen mit highways auch keine Fahrspuren!
PT-53 (2021-01-06 11:34:49+00:00): << aber wir mappen mit highways auch keine Fahrspuren! >>
was dann ?
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-01-06 11:52:46+00:00): Die Mittellinie der Straße.
OSM_RogerWilco (2021-01-06 12:06:18+00:00): Das wird klarer, wenn man sich das bei einer T-Kreuzung vorstellt: Hier sind auch die Bordsteinkanten nicht rechtwinklig sondern gerundet ausgeführt.
Wie sollte man nach dem gleichen Prinzip wie hier (Fahrbahn des Fahrzeuges) die Linie zeichnen? Dann müsste man zwei Linien (für Linksabbieger und Rechtsabbieger) einzeichnen.
Demnach dürfte es gar keine rechten Winkel bei highways geben, weil niemand einen rechten Winkel fährt oder geht.
ovruni (2020-12-27 04:46:10+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios ha agregado vías sobre otras vías ya existentes, lo cual genera vías superpuestas, en caso desee agregar nombre una vía, modifique la vía existente y agregue el nombre en el segmento de vía correspondiente. Por otra parte el uso de la etiqueta "highway=trunk" [0] se encuentra destinado para carreteras importantes, no para vías internas de un pueblo, a menos que forme parte de la carretera importante que atraviesa el pueblo.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:highway%3Dtrunk
ovruni (2020-12-27 04:48:18+00:00): Hola, he notado que en este conjunto de cambios se ha cambiado la etiqueta de un centro de salud a "amenity=hospital". El uso esta etiqueta se encuentra destinado para los hospitales, los cuales en Perú suelen tener categorías II o III. 
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dhospital
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-28 07:10:19+00:00): Hi bruno_b, welcome to OSM.

It's a good practice to edit only local areas and not all over the world like this edit.
This update will be seen by many people all over the world!

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Arane Labs (2020-12-28 14:06:34+00:00): Hi Adamant, 

has the source of these buildings changed?
Adamant1 (2020-12-28 19:30:41+00:00): Yeah. To me and the satellite images that I used to readjust them with to the proper areas. Which is reflected in the changeset.
pitscheplatsch (2020-12-28 07:16:15+00:00): Hi greensfees, welcome to OSM.

Please don't use the name-tag for describing objects such as "cart path". Thanks.

#GolfMapping
---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-03-06 14:27:11+00:00): Are you sure that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/225810580/history is actually a fishpond?
user_5359 (2020-12-27 05:35:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
喵耳引力波 (2022-01-20 08:32:11+00:00): “肯定會被我們銘記的 畢竟貢獻了這麼多低劣的數據 我們還要忙半天恢復”

——OSMChina 中文群
user_5239402 (2020-12-27 04:42:20+00:00): 안녕하세요 
어떤 사람이 수도권제1순환고속도로의 남양주,강동 구간의 도로를 다 삭제하였습니다. 혹시 되돌리실수 있나요?
LuxuryCoop (2020-12-27 09:54:06+00:00): @ghkdgnstjr1 이제야 봤네요. JOSM의 reverter 플러그인을 쓰면 복구가 가능한데, 그 사이에 이미 직접 복구하신 것 같네요. 다음 번에는 좀 더 일찍 볼 수 있도록 노력하겠습니다.
user_5239402 (2020-12-27 11:54:28+00:00): 제가 JOSM의 사용법을 잘 몰라서 직접 복구하였습니다.
pardthemonster (2021-01-01 10:59:01+00:00): This edit has moved 4894 nodes more than 100 meters.  The York River is now way off further causing it to not render on a large scale.

See also:
https://osmcha.org/changesets/96471991/
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96471991
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=96471991#13/37.2724/-76.5063

If you are OK I can have someone revert this edit as that may be the cleanest way to recover.
iandees (2021-01-01 14:54:38+00:00): I reverted the node drags in the northern part of this changeset in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96774531 but kept the other changes.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96471991
Polarbear-repair (2021-01-06 21:59:02+00:00): Hi nickvet419, 
you have added this underground object 
way 888787630
in front of the Capitol. 
It is clearly not visible in aerial imagery, so may I ask what is the source of this edit?
What is it specifically, maybe underground parking?
iandees (2021-01-06 22:31:58+00:00): Reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97073753
nickvet419 (2021-01-07 01:16:57+00:00): Underground building parts and passageways.  Detailed information can be found at https://www.washingtontunnels.com/capitol-hill-map
nickvet419 (2021-01-07 03:38:17+00:00): The underground building extension was build in 2004 https://web.archive.org/web/20041025102632/http://www.aoc.gov/cvc/weekly/2004/05-24-04.pdf
user_5239402 (2020-12-27 04:45:29+00:00): 안녕하세요. 바뀜집합의 글을 꼭 적어주시기 바랍니다. 왜냐하면 다른 지도 작성자가 귀하가 한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있도록 해주는 예의 입니다. 변경 세트 주석을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 한 일과 그 이유가 당신의 일이 아니다"라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고있는 프로젝트에 적합하지 않습니다! 오해를 피하고 실수를 신속하게 수정하기 위해 – "Bing에서 몇 집을 추적했습니다"라는 바뀜 집합 댓글이있는 편집이 50 개의 식당을 삭제하면 이것이 실수 였음이 분명한 반면 "음식점 제거 지난주 설문 조사에서 문을 닫은 것으로 나타났습니다."는 정당한 이유로 이러한 식당을 삭제하려는 의도가 있음을 분명히 보여줍니다. 당신이 무엇을 하였고 당신의 출처가 무엇이었는지 설명함으로써 편집의 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지 합니다.
Orozcu (2020-12-28 18:39:41+00:00): Me toca volver a editar el trabajo, usted no debio restablecer el cambio.
ZeLonewolf (2020-12-28 19:22:15+00:00): ¿Por qué dejas el límite en una condición rota?
Orozcu (2020-12-28 23:07:44+00:00): No tenia internet en esos días. pero ya estoy de vuelta
Orozcu (2020-12-28 23:07:59+00:00): Disculpe quien es usted?
ZeLonewolf (2020-12-28 23:14:56+00:00): Programé una aplicación que consume datos de límites. Cuando los límites se rompen, mi aplicación ya no puede usarlos. Lo siento si mi español es malo, estoy usando un traductor.
BCNorwich (2020-12-27 20:18:42+00:00): Hi, Sorry to say your adjustments have somehow really messed the outline up dragging thigs out of shape. Also deleteing the historic=archaeological_site area completely. I think you were trying to lineup the outline with an image that was not originally used to make the outline. If you look at the Maxar imagery you'll see it corresponds quite well to the original drawn outline.

May I respectfully suggest the changeset be reverted. If you need help please just ask and I can revert it.

Regards Bernard.
dyingtrees (2020-12-27 20:24:21+00:00): You are right. I will get this back to the way it was. My apologies.
GOwin (2021-01-08 03:23:12+00:00): Hi there. What does the suffix " - md" mean in the convenience stores you've been adding to the map?
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 08:28:41+00:00): 1. The name is no "tunnels" 
2. Please fix and give feedback to your application. There's no point in modifying legal restriction here.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 08:30:02+00:00): 3. Also you deleted `wikipedia=`, `wikidata=`, and `name:*=`
user_5359 (2020-12-27 06:11:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building.
SomeoneElse (2020-12-27 20:36:36+00:00): Hello,

Please don't just use changeset comments like "corrections" - it really doesn't help other mappers understand what has changed.  Can you try and explain what you actually did change?

Best Regards,

Andy
SomeoneElse (2020-12-27 20:37:01+00:00): Hallo,

Bitte verwenden Sie nicht nur Änderungskommentare wie "Korrekturen" - es hilft anderen Mappern wirklich nicht zu verstehen, was sich geändert hat. Können Sie versuchen zu erklären, was Sie tatsächlich geändert haben?

Freundliche Grüße,

Andy
Heinz_V (2020-12-29 09:23:44+00:00): I hatte versehentlich alle ways der Grenze von Indien umbenannt, statt nur den Namen in der Relation zu ändern. Hierauf wurde ich von NM$L hingewiesen. In diesem changeset habe ich die notwendigen Korrekturen durchgeführt.
Ali00098 (2020-12-27 14:35:47+00:00): Hi. Why are you trying to add the name of Alavijeh city to all places and roads? This is wrong and is a manipulation of the map.
hossein132 (2020-12-27 14:52:13+00:00): شما نمیخواد انگلیسی تایپ کنی سختت میشه
بجاش قبول کن علویجه وجود داره و نمیشه حذفش کرد
user_6584176 (2020-12-27 14:35:18+00:00): http://www.nsb.gov.bt/GIS/map/SJ/SJONGKHAR_SETTLEMENT.pdf 你删除了不丹的Gewog关系，待修正不完整
Glassman (2020-12-27 22:53:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM. I changed the name to an address tag. I'm guessing the house is in Wood Creek - but I don't have a zip code to add. Also, in OSM we spell out streetnames. The reason is software has a hard time with abbreviated name.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96473849
user_21736114 (2025-05-18 09:22:53+00:00): запам'ятай назавжди 
дороги обласного значення тобто дороги з буквою О повинні бути у 90 відсотків випадків tertiary або secondary
з 2014 року в проекті і цього не знать 
я хуею без баяна з тебе
tio-Jorge (2025-05-19 11:06:00+00:00): Хуєй далі ,не бикуй.
user_5239402 (2020-12-27 08:06:54+00:00): 안녕하세요. 바뀜집합의 글을 꼭 적어주시기 바랍니다. 왜냐하면 다른 지도 작성자가 귀하가 한 일과 그 이유를 더 쉽게 이해할 수 있도록 해주는 예의 입니다. 변경 세트 주석을 사용하지 않는 것은 "내가 여기서 한 일과 그 이유가 당신의 일이 아니다"라는 분위기를 내며 우리 모두가 같은 일을 하고있는 프로젝트에 적합하지 않습니다! 오해를 피하고 실수를 신속하게 수정하기 위해 – "Bing에서 몇 집을 추적했습니다"라는 바뀜 집합 댓글이있는 편집이 50 개의 식당을 삭제하면 이것이 실수 였음이 분명한 반면 "음식점 제거 지난주 설문 조사에서 문을 닫은 것으로 나타났습니다."는 정당한 이유로 이러한 식당을 삭제하려는 의도가 있음을 분명히 보여줍니다. 당신이 무엇을 하였고 당신의 출처가 무엇이었는지 설명함으로써 편집의 가치를 높이고 편집 전쟁을 방지 합니다.
silles2 (2020-12-28 13:49:17+00:00): 네 의견 감사합니다.
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-12-27 09:04:41+00:00): sorry for oversized edit area :(
village (2021-04-20 20:31:39+00:00): Leider hast du beim Bearbeiten der Platform Diezmannstr. diese ans Ende der Routen-Relation verschoben, sie gehört aber unmittelbar hinter die `stop_position`.  

(Ich weiß inzwischen, wie unbequem so eine Korrektur mit iD (dem im-Browser Editor) ist.)

Hab's jetzt korrigiert.
limes11 (2021-04-20 21:44:40+00:00): Oha, sehr aufmerksam. Vielen Dank für die Korrektur!
village (2021-04-23 00:08:54+00:00): Das war meine Quelle:
https://ptna.openstreetmap.de/results/DE/SN/DE-SN-MDV-Analysis.diff.html#tram_1_1E
(hier im "diff view", war heute noch zu sehen)
village (2021-04-23 00:09:46+00:00): Auswertung läuft nächtlich, der diff bleibt aber offenbar stehen, wenn es keine weitere Änderung gab.
chris-ca (2021-11-03 18:46:57+00:00): Please note that on openstreetmap, a dormitory should NOT be tagged as a hostel.

A hostel offers shared rooms for travelers (tourists) which is not the case here
aceman444 (2021-05-02 12:31:40+00:00): Zdravim, nepouzivajte na Slovensku zastarale snimky Bing, pouzite snimky Ortofotomozaika SR, alebo Maxar.
michalfabik (2021-01-07 09:14:06+00:00): Thank you!
katpatuka (2021-02-20 17:00:29+00:00): Hello Lepuse, can you tell if the subdivisions of  弋江区 need to get updated? zhwiki and osm show 10 街道 and one 镇 but http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2020/34/02/340203.html lists only 6 街道,,,
Lepuse (2021-02-20 17:13:44+00:00): 弋江区 has merged with 三山区 in 2020, and the division code of the National Bureau of Statistics is still separate for the time being. The extra 4 街道 are from the original 三山区.
katpatuka (2021-02-20 17:35:39+00:00): Ok, thanks - I wasn't aware of the merging ;) 

zhwiki still shows 中山南路街道 while osm shows a 中南 (中南街道 on stats.gov); 利民路街道 is deprecated I suppose?
Lepuse (2021-02-20 17:50:02+00:00): Yes, 中山南路街道 is also merged with 利民路街道 into 中南街道
maferikotupi (2020-12-27 14:25:23+00:00): Petite erreur de codage
Il fallait mettre cycleway:left et non right
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 11:10:39+00:00): 1. You haven't replied on previous discussions, which holds some consensus among others
2. I have repeated repeatedly that the purpose of this is to handle non-Expressway connections to Expressway. `=motorway_link` is the best compromise to handle this.
小智智 (2020-12-27 11:13:42+00:00): I also have repeated that it's misleading to tag highway=motorway_link on long stretch of roads which are clearly not motorways. Shun Long Road is not a motorway and it is a separate highway to any of the motorways around the area. It is just a normal road which connects the HK port to Lantau Island.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 11:15:12+00:00): The definition of `=motorway_link` is that it connects to `=motorway`. Would you  explain to us how this doesn't fit.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 11:15:50+00:00): There is no requirement for the `=motorway_link` itself to be in a `=motorway` area.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 11:16:35+00:00): I myself dislike `=motorway` and `=motorway_link`, but this is the legacy.
小智智 (2020-12-27 11:19:56+00:00): Shun Long Road is not a link. It is a distributor road. Therefore tagging it as *_link is inappropriate.

For Airport Road, it is neither a link nor a distributor road. It is an extension of the motorway itself.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 11:20:17+00:00): One may further argue `=motorway` can follow the point of last diverge as well, extending beyond the `=motorway`-area limit. This is debatable, as what you may object here. That's one of the reasons `=motorway_link`
小智智 (2020-12-27 11:21:08+00:00): Similar cases include Hung Tin Road, Tsing Tin Road, Po Shun Road, Long Tin Road, etc.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 11:23:20+00:00): Please don't bring official-only "distributor" terminology with no bearing here. They have no influence on functional consideration. 
Your choice is: 
1. Extend as `=motorway`, which is misleading on Expressway area
2. Extend as `=primary`, which is misleading on the connection to Expressway. 
Thus `=motorway_link` is chosen. It fits the definition of `=motorway_link` on 2, and offer a compromise on 1.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 11:24:08+00:00): Please don't mention non-Expressway connections like Tsing Tin Rd. `=trunk_link` is another matter, complicated by `=*_link` itself.
小智智 (2020-12-27 11:25:30+00:00): =motorway_link is also misleading here as "Shun Long Road is not a link".
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 11:25:35+00:00): 1, Hung Tin Rd can be reasonably treated as a entrance/exit at the end. 
2. Long Tin Rd doesn't connect to Yuen Long Hwy only. 
3. Po Shun Rd connects to non-Tunnel Cross-Bay Link as well.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 11:27:05+00:00): 1. You haven't responded on the rest of the  balance of factors above. 
2. As I mentioned, `=*_link` itself is flawed, but we have to work with it. Same with `=motorway` and `=motorway_link` to me,
小智智 (2020-12-27 11:31:47+00:00): I don't think that it's correct to put highway=*_link on a road which is not a pure link. And there is no requirement that highway=trunk/primary/secondary/etc. must serve non motorway traffic. Moreover, it is also possible to have classification change in the middle of the driveway, like the southern end of route 1.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-27 11:37:01+00:00): 1. I don't disagree, but it is the least worse. The alternative would be `=motorway` worldwide
2. The "requirement" is `=motorway_link` for `=motorway` connections. 
2. As I said, `=trunk` and `=trunk_link` is another matter. `=motorway` and `=motorway_link` has special meaning
🗺🗺🗺 (2020-12-28 12:58:33+00:00): Shun Long Road is a link road. It acts as the slip/link road for and between North Lantau Highway, Tuen Mun Chek Lap Kok Tunnel and local destinations in HZMB Hong Kong Port and Chek Lap Kok. It just so happened to have a name and be very long in Hong Kong standard.
Kovoschiz (2020-12-29 12:00:05+00:00): Also it may possibly seen as a split interchange
Kovoschiz (2020-12-29 12:00:58+00:00): `*_link=` having street names is not uncommon either.
dvdhoven (2020-12-27 11:16:36+00:00): Hallo Wim,
Met ID kun je geen routes bewerken. Dat kan alleen met JOSM.
Als je met ID een weg doorknipt, is er zeer grote kans dat de sortering van routes, die op die weg lopen verstoord raakt. Routes moeten een sortering hebben.
Dat was ook hier het geval, de sortering van een fietsroute, 3 wandelroutes en een paardrijroute waren verstoord.
Die heb ik hersteld.
Verder voegt ID altijd nieuwe stukken achteraan in een route toe, dat is meestal niet de plek waar je ze wilt hebben.
Dat was dus ook gebeurt bij de MTB route Liessel. Die bevatte allerlei gaten. Het hinderlijke daarvan is, dat je op een gegeven moment niet meer weet of een gat echt een gat is of simpel dat een wegstuk op de verkeerde plek in de route ligt. Ik heb de MTB route weer sluitend gemaakt.
Met Waymarked Trails kun je zien of het nu klopt https://mtb.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=9677072&map=18!51.4234!5.7948

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Wim Peeters (2020-12-27 13:02:56+00:00): Bedankt! Dat wist ik niet. Kun je ID wel gebruiken voor paden/wegen te tekenen (nog nooit commentaar op gehad).
Ik ga JOSM eens installeren en testen.
Nog een vraag, hoe zie jij zo snel dat er een wijziging is gedaan, ik zou dat ook wel eens willen weten, want soms heb ik het idee dat er sporen paden bewust worden uitgeveegd of attributes worden aangepast.

gr Wim
dvdhoven (2020-12-27 13:36:07+00:00): Hallo Wim,

Voor wegen en paden kan wel zolang je wegen en paden waarop routes lopen niet door knipt. Dan kun je volgorde problemen krijgen.
Ik zag het omdat er een tool draait knooppuntnet.nl waar alle fouten in knooppuntroutes worden gemonitord. Ik zag dus fouten in de routes en ook in welke changeset en waar.
Daarmee kun je niet alles zien wat er gewijzigd wordt
Je kunt eens op deze site resultmaps.neis-one.org snuffelen
Daar vind je diverse overzichten van de activiteiten binnen OSM

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Wim Peeters (2020-12-27 19:36:34+00:00): Dag, ik heb een poging gedaan voor MTB ROUTE ASTEN. Met JOSM. Zou je die kunnen nakijken? Ik heb deze nog niet geupload, wil je de file hebben of gelijk uploaden? gr Wim
dvdhoven (2020-12-27 20:43:54+00:00): Hallo Wim,
Upload hem maar.
Ik kan er morgen naar kijken

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
dvdhoven (2020-12-28 18:48:16+00:00): Wim,
Ik heb naar de Asten route gekeken.
Direct bovenaaan, moet je nog een klein stukje van de highway 13 nodes afknippen om hem sluitend te maken op de highway 15 nodes.
En om die highway 15 sluitend te krijgen op de highway 43 nodes onderaan, moet je het fietspad waarop beiden op aansluiten nog 2x doorknippen en dat kleine stukje nog toevoegen.
Voor de rest is de route geheel sluitend.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
Wim Peeters (2020-12-29 17:41:26+00:00): Gedaan, althans ik zal de fouten goed, maar ik kan de nummers niet goed herleiden, highway 15 is dat de 15e sectie van de route die je bedoelde, ik zie anders geen nummers. Ik heb gelijk de start van de route als sectie 1 begonnen (zo hoort het volgens mij)
dvdhoven (2020-12-29 18:18:17+00:00): Hallo Wim,

Nee, ik bedoelde het aantal nodes, dat staat in het relatiewindow tusssen haakjes achter highway. 
Zo onderscheid ik de naamloze highways een beetje

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
maraf24 (2020-12-28 00:42:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888828979
maraf24 (2020-12-28 00:44:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888833498 - trawa, nie budynek
maraf24 (2020-12-28 00:44:42+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888831261
maraf24 (2020-12-28 00:47:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888832939
Sporo tego.
maraf24 (2020-12-28 00:43:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888835901 - słoma jako budynek?
maraf24 (2020-12-28 00:45:43+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/888835281 - poletko
kpv8 (2020-12-28 04:14:06+00:00): Możliwe że kiedyś tam szopy stały i ktoś kto aktualizuje bazę danych BDOT10k w powiecie nie zmienił tego, albo niedawno powstały bo ortofomapy są dosyć stare.
maraf24 (2020-12-28 22:03:45+00:00): Z pewności ortofotomapy są znacznie nowsze niż budynki, które można znaleźć na w GUGIKu. Cykl aktualizacji tej warstwy jest zdaje się 10-letni, a orto góra 3-4 letnie.
Dlatego przy imporcie trzeba sprawdzać na orto czy budynku nie wyburzono. Czasem zresztą widać pozostałości - ściany, rumowisko itp.
angys (2020-12-27 11:37:01+00:00): PLUS Office should remove the tag building=yes
angys (2020-12-27 11:37:42+00:00): When you draw a polygon of a non-building area, please remove the building=yes tag.
banban_msm (2020-12-28 03:10:08+00:00): I checked and found there is no more building tag. I assume you have removed it for me. Thanks.
angys (2020-12-28 03:16:07+00:00): Yes, next time you can change the building setting directly.

and for those house, please press Ctrl-Q to let it become square
skquinn (2020-12-27 10:03:30+00:00): Also added a couple of addresses; sources should include web searches.
maraf24 (2020-12-29 22:21:40+00:00): Wycofałem w https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96627149
Michal Filip (2020-12-27 10:05:24+00:00): Aktualizacja obiektów na terenie wyciągu narciarskiego w Stobiernej.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2020-12-29 17:54:42+00:00): Why was this place removed??
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2020-12-29 18:03:46+00:00): Why was this place removed??
eggie (2020-12-31 10:59:11+00:00): Beste Stroet... Waarom nu zo'n groot gebied editten in één changeset?

Fijne jaarwisseling
eggie
aceman444 (2021-02-07 01:07:09+00:00): Zdravim, preco ste spojili body so znackami public_transport=platform a public_transport=stop_position? (Ivanka pri Dunaji,,ZUŠ). Poskodili ste tym linky MHD.
abakus_uploader (2020-12-27 23:32:02+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
czubi (2020-12-27 20:20:05+00:00): Bitte benutze name nur für Eigennamen alles andere bitte unter descriptions. danke
czubi (2020-12-28 12:09:26+00:00): name in old_name korr.
woodpeck_repair (2020-12-27 17:15:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 96492254 where the changeset comment is: Löschung von Wegen in Lorsbach rückgängig, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4653