piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2017-01-12 17:27:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:21:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
M!dgard (2017-01-09 10:59:21+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44766810
MKnight (2017-01-09 14:59:32+00:00): rückgängig gemacht in #45028003
sds_rastenberg (2017-01-10 07:55:07+00:00): Die SDS GmbH befindet sich seit Jahren am angegebenen Ort.
MKnight (2017-01-10 10:42:34+00:00): Bestimmt, allerdings nicht in der Ausdehnung: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/115826009
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:07:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Commodoortje (2017-01-14 18:29:00+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik ben bereid om je te helpen.
Commodoortje (2017-01-14 18:36:53+00:00): Ik heb inmiddels het gebouw ook op OSM geplaatst. Dank je voor je bijdrage.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/07ge889ctsqr5fo/2017-01-14_19-35-25.png?raw=1
mavl (2017-01-12 17:19:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
M!dgard (2017-01-09 11:05:45+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44766810
mavl (2017-01-12 17:13:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
pitscheplatsch (2017-01-15 20:01:50+00:00): Hi Flavio Muniz, welcome to OSM. Please don't add test data to the live OSM Server. 
If you want a test server, perhaps http://api06.dev.openstreetmap.org/ would work for you?
dikkeknodel (2018-06-12 07:50:27+00:00): Hi ti-lo,
I do not understand the fixme you added. Firstly it does not specify what should be fixed. Additionally, it seems to describe a rendering problem, not a problem with the map data.
Could you please explain?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 13:05:13+00:00): Since no response, I removed it:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/59940754
mavl (2017-01-12 17:24:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
M!dgard (2017-01-09 11:17:35+00:00): See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44766810
mavl (2017-01-12 17:17:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Robert Whittaker (2017-01-10 23:13:09+00:00): Are you sure the postcode of "CH46 7SJ" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4597864960 is correct? According to Code-Point Open, that postcode is actually located over 1.3km away on Mallard Way.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:39:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:35:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:09:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:18:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
user_5359 (2017-01-20 18:59:14+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
mavl (2017-01-12 17:15:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:24:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:11:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Vladimír Domes (2017-01-09 12:30:49+00:00): I inserted wrong comment to this changeset. It should be: Adding new service highways.
user_5359 (2017-01-20 18:58:04+00:00): Welcoem to OSM! Did you see the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/431345730 ? I delete your duplicate entry.
SomeoneElse (2017-01-09 14:28:51+00:00): Again with the "fix highway problems"...
2 days ago I asked you about https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44950601 , no reply as yet.
Please use meaningful changeset comments explaining what you changed and why, and please use smaller bounding boxes so that everyone in the UK and many in Ireland and France won't see changesets like this one in their feed.
Best Regards,
Andy
chillly (2017-01-13 11:01:14+00:00): I think these unanswered changeset comments have gone far enough. Undiscussed, unresponsive mass edits should be reverted.
dmgroom_ct (2017-01-15 09:59:32+00:00): I have no idea what changeset comments were not being emailed to me, but to be fair there were enough other ways of contacting me.
dmgroom_ct (2017-01-15 10:05:54+00:00): It would appear Google was treating all change set comment messages as Spam
Peilscheibe (2017-01-10 14:37:35+00:00): Hallo, willkommen bei OSM. Das Gebäude hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27015574 hat nach Deinem edit jetzt einen kreisrunden Umriß. Bist Du sicher, dass das so gewollt ist?
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
user_5359 (2017-01-20 19:05:45+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Supaplex (2017-03-02 16:01:05+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
lolo13 (2017-01-09 13:38:05+00:00): Merci d'avoir contribué j'ai effectué aussi la coupure du chemin de Saint Christophe, dont une partie seulement est en sens unique.
J'ai fait un commentaire sur la zone de vignoble issue de corine qui n'est pas à jour... Mais la modification du polygone est plus délicate, notamment lorsqu'un sommet du polygone est confondu avec celui d'un autre polygone...
edvac (2017-03-19 17:56:53+00:00): In this changeset you have used data from the Institut National de la Statistique du Niger (http://www.stat-niger.org/statistique/).
Have you discused this data import with the local community (OSM-NE) and the overall OSM community, and follow the Import Guidelines?
Otherwise, this changeset should be reverted.
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
edvac (2017-03-19 17:56:48+00:00): In this changeset you have used data from the Institut National de la Statistique du Niger (http://www.stat-niger.org/statistique/).
Have you discused this data import with the local community (OSM-NE) and the overall OSM community, and follow the Import Guidelines?
Otherwise, this changeset should be reverted.
Abendstund (2017-01-09 15:36:26+00:00): hej,
hat es einen Grund, dass du "highway" hier auf "secondary" gesetzt hast? das ist doch eher highway=residential denn eine hauptstraße.
grüße!
Eckhoff(HHA) (2017-01-10 07:15:29+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Ich habe die Straße in "highway=residential" geändert.
user_5359 (2017-01-20 19:09:03+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-20 19:11:08+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-20 19:11:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-20 19:11:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Supaplex (2017-01-13 16:46:02+00:00): 用這個tag好像怪怪的
Vintagejhan (2017-01-09 13:39:27+00:00): 您好，預定的道路請改用highway=proposed;
highway=path使用方式請見http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath
maraf24 (2017-01-12 22:02:59+00:00): Ulice w Białymstoku nie zmieniły jeszcze nazw.
maraf24 (2017-01-12 22:07:43+00:00): Stanie się to 24 stycznia i proszę do tego czasu nie zmieniać nazw.
Mike Baggaley (2017-01-17 16:48:51+00:00): Hi, I think that the bus only restriction may be just at the end of way 464720540 to prevent through traffic, rather than along the whole of that and adjoining way 302285986. It seems to be a new housing estate, so it seems unlikely that residents would not have access to their own houses. At the very least I would expect them to have pedestrian access (perhaps motor_vehicle=no rather than access=no). Can you please check?

Thanks,
Mike
robbob700 (2017-01-17 22:34:47+00:00): Thanks Mike
Yes I meant to show this as a shorter length of road.  I've now corrected it.
Robert
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
ivanbranco (2021-12-21 16:56:59+00:00): Hi,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4598128451
this was supposed to be an hamlet I suppose?
osm_saint-louis (2021-12-21 17:00:09+00:00): Yes.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:34:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:21:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mueschel (2017-01-10 10:50:17+00:00): Hi,
I found 195 buildings in your changesets with a spelling mistake:
"buildling=yes" 
Could you have a look and correct these?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/l9U

Jan
njsmurf1813 (2017-01-13 13:29:33+00:00): Jan! 
Thanks for finding this.
Getting this fixed right away. 
- Max
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:23:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:36:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:12:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:38:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:31:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:37:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:10:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-10-15 14:34:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52954908 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44953944].
majkaz (2017-01-10 07:36:37+00:00): Ahoj,
není v tomhle případě geometrie z RUIAN nešťastná? U všech budov tím chybí podloubí, a jejich část v patře nad podloubím.

Přesně z tohohle důvodu jsem všechny budovy okolo náměstí považovala za nevhodné k přetrasování.
JandaM (2017-01-10 08:32:39+00:00): Omlouvam se je to moje chyba. Nemel jsem to pretrasovavat. V teto casti namesti jsem to prehledl. Jinde jsem nepokracoval v trasovani protoze jsem si vsiml prave podlobi. Navhrhuji revert
JandaM (2017-01-10 08:38:11+00:00): Revert proveden
mavl (2017-01-12 17:33:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Supaplex (2017-01-09 15:05:37+00:00): 已經修改為正確的tag，
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/45027971
請不要為了顯示在地圖上而用不適當的tag，應該用highway=proposed, proposed=motorway
韋per (2017-01-10 10:33:21+00:00): Ok,謝謝
Supaplex (2017-01-10 11:04:07+00:00): http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/l9W
你可以看這個檢索，資料能夠呈現或是下載下來
mavl (2017-01-12 17:21:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:21:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:04:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
clemhoh (2017-01-10 20:26:05+00:00): Vielen Dank fürs Eintragen der Augustusburger Loipe! Ich habe beim E-Weg die Relation rausgenommen und nur als "nordic" getaggt. Der Weg war zumindest am Montag sehr ausgetreten und eine Spur in den meisten Bereichen kaum erkennbar. Da sehr beliebtes Ziel für Fußgänger/Wanderer wird das der Normalzustand sein. Clemens
mavl (2017-01-12 17:17:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:24:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:06:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
g0ldfish (2017-10-19 16:25:44+00:00): Hallo, du hast in diesem Änderungssatz einige m.M.n. nicht existierende Gebäude in den Wald gesetzt, dieses hier:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/464731546 und direkt daneben noch eins.

Kannst du das erklären? Etwas historisches? Oder vielleicht eine Täuschung beim Luftbildmappen? Gibt es noch mehr davon?

Danke im Voraus für Aufklärung!
Nakaner (2017-10-19 20:59:24+00:00): Hallo g0ldfisch,

ich denke, die Benutzerkontensperren (die Nachrichten dazu) dürften deine Frage beantworten. https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bot45715/blocks

Viele Grüße

Michael
g0ldfish (2017-10-23 08:47:39+00:00): Hallo Michael,

ja, danke, ich hatte das erst kurz nach dem Schreiben gesehen. Ich werde dann mal ein bisschen hinterherräumen und Bot45715s Änderungen im einzelnen durchgehen, soweit mir die Gegenden bekannt sind.

Danke, g
OSM-Bot (2019-10-20 08:29:36+00:00): Danke!
mavl (2017-01-12 17:38:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
mavl (2017-01-12 17:20:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
Hjart (2017-01-09 15:11:46+00:00): Jeg har lige rettet en række tilfælde hvor du her fik koblet veje og stier fra hinanden
deavmi (2017-01-09 14:55:04+00:00): There is a river here that needs to be documented.
mavl (2017-01-12 17:39:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 45106895 where the changeset comment is: The changesets of the contributor chinakz are reverted [http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1147].
NonnEmilia (2017-02-23 13:52:37+00:00): Ciao Diego, ho visto che in questo changeset hai convertito alcune strade da pedestrian a residential.
Attento perché dall'incrocio con Via Guido da Castello fino all'incrocio con via Roma la Via Emilia è zona pedonale (highway=pedestrian), non residential. Puoi confrontare anche con i dati contenuti sul sito degli OpenData del comune: http://opendata.comune.re.it/dataset/ztl-e-aree-pedonali/resource/4c895940-620b-4d1c-8953-373371f467bf

Buon mapping!