piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-19 11:18:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43002147 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
Nakaner (2016-10-19 06:53:08+00:00): Hi ottawa_data,

please stop uploading any changesets in and around Ottawa! There is an ongoing revert of a import which violated our policies.

https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2016-October/007416.html https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2016-October/007449.html

You might get blocked if you ignore this message.

Best regards

Michael
Supaplex (2016-10-19 15:06:00+00:00): 不小心動到行政邊界了，我已經恢復兩個里的邊界了
daivdds (2016-10-21 16:14:38+00:00): 抱歉，下次會小心
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-19 11:18:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 43002147 where the changeset comment is: revert un-discussed building import in Ottawa
user_5359 (2016-10-30 12:03:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I Don’t beleave that a post office has the name „My house“.
user_5359 (2016-10-30 12:03:55+00:00): For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
user_5359 (2016-10-30 12:01:54+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Thomas8122 (2016-10-20 08:21:29+00:00): Sicher, dass hier ein Fleischer ist? Die Adresse und die website weisen auf das Cunnersdorf in der Sächs. Schweiz hin.
Thomas8122 (2016-11-07 13:56:52+00:00): die Adresse hab ich jetzt entfernt, ob da wirklich ein Fleischer ist mir Wurst
PlaneMad (2016-10-29 07:39:33+00:00): Made some corrections by merging with the duplicate ways. Thanks.
MiroJanosik (2016-12-14 11:20:19+00:00): ahoj, Antes GM si dal ze je to turisticka atrakcia ... ale ono je to obchod s elektronikou. Takze to upravim nech je to spravne.
lcmortensen (2016-10-23 03:01:37+00:00): Reverted in changeset 43092600 .Waikato Expressway is not a motorway south of Bombay, as signed on the actual road. Expressways are tagged as trunk roads.
user_5359 (2016-10-30 12:05:57+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
maraf24 (2016-12-03 20:59:15+00:00): Removed.
user_599436 (2016-10-19 12:09:58+00:00): Would you kindly leave a description of what has changed?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Olga | Yanosik (2017-07-21 11:23:38+00:00): Pawle, na czas remontu/przebudowy Marynarskiej dodałam zakazy skrętu w Postępu z datą końcową 2017-07-30. Jak to miejsce teraz wygląda? Czy nadal nie wolno skręcać?
Think of Home (2017-07-22 10:15:05+00:00): Cześć,
na chwilę obecną nadal jadąc w obu kierunkach Marynarską mamy nakazy jazdy na wprost.
GerdP (2017-08-22 09:12:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM!
I've noticed this change because you used
highway=Anadolu Caddesi
for a building. This tag is normally used for roads, so I wonder what you meant?
woodpeck_repair (2016-10-19 11:18:40+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 42999856, 42999702, 42999850, 42984404, 42999799, 42999775, 42999911, 42999556, 43000094, 42999633, 43000299, 42999881, 42987576, 43000166, 42999915, 43000003, 43000147, 43000316, 43000063, 42999840, 42986957, 42984206, 43000247, 43000225, 43000117, 42999745, 42999927, 42999602, 42999679, 43000393.
GerdP (2017-08-23 05:49:33+00:00): Hi!
You used highway=* in combination with ice_road=yes for this way.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448457687
The wiki for ice_road might be missleading:
The highway=* should also be present on the way, and its value should reflect importance of the given highway."
I've changed it to highway=track. Same for https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448110901#map=16/53.4345/82.5919
user_5359 (2016-10-30 12:09:50+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
highflyer74 (2016-10-20 14:05:31+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Du bist ja schon länger dabei, aber in Sachen Mapping noch recht "neu". Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall will ich Dich davon überzeugen, bitte zum Editieren nicht Maps.Me zu verwenden. Maps.Me ist zum Editieren keine gute Idee, da es nicht den aktuellen Stand der Datenbank abbildet und es somit oft zu Doppeleintragungen und anderen Problemen kommt (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps.Me/Questionable_OSM_Edits und http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=54874). Für Android kann ich den Editor Vespucci empfehlen.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:20:38+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/448471313
has no tags. What is it?
user_5359 (2016-10-30 13:55:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-10-30 13:55:55+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
Alecs01 (2016-10-22 13:10:34+00:00): The museum was already on the map https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4454807990 deleted
user_5359 (2016-10-30 13:59:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Did you see the building https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/206007425 ? I have merge your duplicate entry!
marc__marc (2021-03-09 22:40:31+00:00): Bonjour,
je ne comprend pas trop pourquoi vous avez changé natural=tree indoor=yes (un arbre situé à l'intérieur) en indoor=tree
ce sont des arbres ou pas ?
Cordialement,
Marc
mboeringa (2021-03-10 17:02:05+00:00): Hi Marc,

Sorry to answer in English, but  I can read and understand your question well enough.

As you noticed, I haven't removed these tree features, just retagged them to what I think in this situation is more appropriate.

I really personally feel that these kind of exceptional features (only very few buildings have true trees in them), should not be tagged with a main tag like natural=tree, without any additional information attached to them.

It is confusing to see trees appear on top of a building feature, suggesting a digitization error, even if this situation is becoming more common. 

Using a main tag like natural=tree for these kind of exceptional features, will also mean that no cartographer will be able to easily filter them out, without resorting to some elaborate point-in-polygon automated check on every tree and building feature in OSM (which would be a pain to do on a global scale).

I feel the "indoor=x" tagging scheme is quite appropriate for this kind of feature, even if it is not currently rendered in the Default map. That is why I changed them to indoor=tree. This will still allow specialized (indoor) renderers to show the features, but not have the confusing tree features appear in every map derived from OSM's database.

Marco
mueschel (2016-10-22 13:27:33+00:00): Please do not invent new tags. Stuff like 'categroy' (note the typo!) is useless for OSM. And even more important: It is obvious that this account has only been registered for this edit. Use one account for all of your edits!
user_5359 (2016-10-30 14:00:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
eggie (2021-03-18 09:35:05+00:00): Ha Sander,
Je hebt bicycle en foot is no getagd op de slagboom op de Hellegatsweg net aan de noordkant van het A59 viaduct. Maar daar loopt een officiele fietsroute en twee wandelroutes.
Ik zet het even om voor beide categorieën naar permissive.
Op de weg zelf is overigens yes getagd. 
Wellicht heb jij meer informatie?
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=43005277

Nu routeert het allemaal niet. 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-18 09:38:28+00:00): Mijn edits..  http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=101245491
eggie (2021-03-18 09:46:17+00:00): Tja Wat nu.... ?

Wat is wijsheid? 
Zal er nu wel of niet een fietsroute lopen? Kom er voorlopig niet in de buurt. 

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.688723400000015&lng=4.409620899999936&z=17&focus=photo&pKey=ee5K5BZq04mdZzSXPQfFaw&x=0.39621774412941907&y=0.44801303758130495&zoom=0.5084745762711864

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-03-18 09:52:40+00:00): Even Dick gevraagd of hij meer weet...
eggie (2021-03-18 11:11:28+00:00): Sander,
Dick suggereert om een medling te doen bij https://www.visitbrabant.com/nl/routes/meldpunt
Sander H (2021-03-18 16:24:51+00:00): Herinner het me weer een beetje, maar kom daar ook niet vaak.
Gezien het manneke op dat gele bord moet je je aanmelden, maar was enkel een knop voor de slagboom en heb het niet uitgeprobeerd toen ik daar was.
Kan me voorstellen dat je normaliter direct toestemming krijgt om te passeren, maar dat als er een schip ligt met gevaarlijke lading het kan voorkomen dat je dan een uurtje moet wachten voordat je verder mag of zo...
Dus access=explicit_request_onsite???
eggie (2021-03-18 16:40:11+00:00): Binnenkort gaat medemapper Peter daar kijken. Nu routeert het in ieder geval voor voetgangers en fietsers. Dit even ivm die routerelaties. 
'k Denk zomaar dat niemand daar op dat knopje drukt  :)

Zie ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/101241308#map=19/51.68852/4.40888&layers=N

'k Laat het nu maar op permissive staan en eens kijken of het za weer routeert met de OFM.
Zag het eigenlijk bij toeval. 

Ben benieuwd wat Peter van Rijn nog vindt. 
Groetjes,
eggie
martiensch (2016-10-20 17:58:24+00:00): Hallo Ulmtuelp,

Kurze Frage: Deine Arbeiten an der Berliner Mauer in der Bernauer Straße war nicht bezüglich Tagging?
(Ich vermute, dass https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42955316 das Problem ist. Jemand hat in Potlatch eine Relation gebaut und wahrscheinlich Wege kombiniert mit verschiedenen Tags, aber du warst der letzte Bearbeiter des Segments.)

Gruß,

Martien
ulmtuelp (2016-10-21 05:54:03+00:00): Hallo, ich habe da nur einen Geometriefehler behoben, doppelter Punkt auf derselben Stelle oder selbstkreuzender Weg. Am Tagging selbst habe ich nichts gändert.
martiensch (2016-10-21 06:59:14+00:00): Topp. Ich kümmer mich mal weiter ;)
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56112
SomeoneElse_Revert (2016-12-14 21:38:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 44403770, 44396421 where the changeset comment is: Initial revert of some google.cn sourced data in China
rab (2016-10-21 18:20:09+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dviewpoint?
LiFo (2016-10-23 12:28:27+00:00): You made one bad edit. moved a node out to sea. looks like a mistake. i will correct it
mboeringa (2016-10-19 11:37:12+00:00): Please see the personal post I send you about the false use of highway=footway for indoor features like corridors.
mapper999 (2016-10-21 19:44:22+00:00): Hello bubix,
has this import been discussed somewhere? It does not comply with OSM conventions and uses uncommon tags (names in CAPITAL letters, add_housen instead of addr:housenumber etc.).
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
bubix (2016-10-24 06:31:59+00:00): It is with the Office Open Data of Town Hall of Palermo. Fot the tags (add_housen instead of addr: housenumber) was an import error. Thanks for the tip. But the names in CAPITAL letters because they are banned?
mapper999 (2016-10-24 20:16:07+00:00): Generally names in OSM should ONLY be spelled in capital letters when they are abbreviations.
Please have a look at the imported nodes and fix the names and street names.
These errors are the reason why imports should be discussed with the community beforehand (see the above link).
bubix (2016-11-02 12:07:01+00:00): I updated the changeset as indicated. For the next import I create a new user type bubix_import and make a request to arrange everything to them: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Talk-it-sicilia-f5798715.html
szutkes (2016-10-31 17:01:41+00:00): To nie zjazdy, tylko rondo tymczasowe, trzebaby poprawić...
Basia | Yanosik (2016-11-03 10:26:19+00:00): Dziękuję za info. Już poprawiłam na rondo. Wiesz może kiedy ma się zakończyć przebudowa tego łącznika?
szutkes (2016-11-03 11:15:14+00:00): To chyba będzie sukcesywnie postępowało jak remont budowa S7.. Możliwe, że jeszcze nie jedna zmiana organizacji ruchu nas czeka :)
Basia | Yanosik (2016-11-03 11:17:41+00:00): tak podejrzewałam ;) postaram się monitorować to miejsce i aktualizować organizację ruchu.
ticho2 (2025-11-23 21:54:41+00:00): Naozaj sa toto pieskovisko vola Toropark? Prijde mi to nepravdepodobne...
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:36:44+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:54:54+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:36:35+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
streinger (2016-10-19 18:19:54+00:00): чем тег apartments не угодил, да и  М3 скорее retail чем commercial.
RobJN (2016-10-23 18:36:51+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap. It looks like you may have had some difficulty making your first edit. The "iD" editor has a good tutorial so I recommend that you start with that. There is also the following guide:
http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/

Feel free to respond here if you need more help. Furthermore we have a local group at mappa-mercia.org should you be interested.
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:36:30+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:54:45+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:36:24+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:52:38+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
user_5359 (2016-10-19 15:30:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move the address node to the right building.
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:36:17+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:52:50+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
aceman444 (2016-10-19 20:16:16+00:00): Dobry den, nedavajte do addr:housename to iste ako do name.

A hlavne ste zabudli to najpodstatnesie - oznacit typ prevadzky. Ze je to veterinar. Podla nazvu to cudzinci nepochopia.
Doplnil som teda amenity=veterinary .

A ak klinika nezabera celu budovu (ale sa tam napr. aj byva), nemali ste znacky dat na celu budovu, ale vytvorit novy bod a umiestnit ho kde zhruba je klinika.
geow (2016-10-20 21:01:25+00:00): Hallo The Arrow, danke für die Ergänzungen der Häuser.  Wie schon vorgestern erläutert, kann du ein Gebäude im iD-Editor leicht rechtwinklig machen, indem du es markiert und "s" (square) drückt.
Bitte beachte auch, dass bei Gebäuden der Grundriss eingetragen wird und nicht die im Luftbild sichtbare Dachfläche, die meist größer ist.
Es wäre schön, wenn du das auch in deinen anderen Änderungssätzen berichtigen würdest, deine Historie kannst hier einsehen http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/TheArrow/history

Danke, geow
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:36:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:53:00+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
literan (2016-10-19 13:22:22+00:00): Воздержитесь, пожалуйста, от добавления субъективных характеристик вроде "недорого". Это все будет вычищено, а при упорствовании вы можете заслужить блокировку за спам. Надеюсь на понимание
literan (2016-10-19 13:33:42+00:00): Плюс вы неверно часы работы расставляете, ознакомьтесь с форматом (бесполезную работу делаете): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:opening_hours
Seotime (2016-10-19 14:53:25+00:00): Спасибо. Исправлю
geow (2017-01-11 22:55:56+00:00): Hi TheArrow, du hast in diesem CS bei einem Radweg highway=path entfernt und den Abschnitt als railway=abandoned gekennzeichnet, siehe
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/245225805

Daher wurde der Radweg in osm-carto nicht mehr gerendert.  Außerdem hast du foot/bicycle von designated auf yes geändert. Das ist falsch, weil es sich um einen gewidmeten und beschilderten Rad/Fußweg handelt (VZ 240). Ich habe beides korrigiert.

Außerdem war das railway=abandoned auf diesem Abschnitt redundant, weil die gesamte ehem. Nebenstrecke (bis Frasdorf) als Routenrelation erfasst ist,
http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/relation/3315704

 Es ist empfehlenswert, nach einem Edit das Ergebnis in der Hauptkarte zu prüfen, dann wäre dir ein Teil der Fehler sicher gleich aufgefallen. 

Viel Spaß weiterhin beim Kartieren
geow
dx125 (2018-11-03 19:47:09+00:00): Hallo wernerg112,
Warum hast Du das Dorfgemeinschaftshaus in Betäubungshalle umbenannt? Du findest das sicher lustig, aber wir von OpenStreetMap haben den Anspruch eine qualitativ gute freie Karte zu erstellen - wir dulden nur Benennungen, die korrekt sind - keine Fantasienamen.
Kannst Du das bitte wieder in Ordnung bringen?
wernerg112 (2018-11-04 16:55:14+00:00): Hier wurde ebenso eine ortsübliche Benennung als "Zweitbegriff" eingetragen.
dx125 (2018-11-04 20:58:32+00:00): Guten Abend,
auf der Karte erscheint als Benennung, was bei "name" eingetragen ist, nämlich: "Betäubungshalle". Wollt Ihr das wirklich?
Ich wohne auch in einem Dorf, wir haben auch eine FFW, usw. aber so was würden wir bei uns lieber nicht auf der Karte sehen wollen, egal was wir bei uns so treiben ...

Wenn man in die Karte weiter rein zoomt, steht dann unter Betäubungshalle noch 
"(ohne)". 
(Einen Moment dachte ich, OHNE Betäubung ;-)
Das kommt von dem Eintrag bei "addr:housenumber". Wenn das Gebäude keine eigene HausNr. hat, dann bitte "addr:housenumber" NICHT verwenden, sondern diese Zeile weg lassen.
Константин Гам (2016-10-19 14:33:30+00:00): спамеры в осм...

время работы заполнено некорректно, описание не является описанием видов деятельности, осм не для этого!
user_5359 (2016-10-19 15:15:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0
highflyer74 (2016-10-20 13:50:29+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

Die Adresse eine Gebäudes wird dem Gebäude hinzugefügt (nicht mit dem name=* Tag, dieses wird nur für Eigennamen verwendet). Ich habe den Node mit der Adresse gelöscht und die Adresse ans Gebäude gehängt.

Auch das Clubheim habe ich nach Wiki getaggt.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
muralito (2016-10-19 18:00:10+00:00): Esta tambien te la ajusté con el edificio dibujado aparte.
user_5359 (2016-10-23 14:36:00+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-17 18:53:09+00:00): I have deleted your entry!
Glassman (2016-10-19 15:40:00+00:00): What was changed? the changedset comments ... don't give much information.
muralito (2016-10-19 17:54:53+00:00): Las escuelas son amenity=school.
Con building se marca solo lo efectivamente construido.
muralito (2016-10-19 17:57:25+00:00): Fijate como la deje. En el caso de elementos grandes, tambien conviene marcarles la entrada, con entrance=yes o entrance=main para que si le pedis una ruta a un navegador te mande a la puerta. Si no puede mandarte a un borde por el que no puedas entrar.
derredu (2016-10-19 19:37:43+00:00): Hallo Käpt'n,
Was bedeutet knoledge?
Map-Meier (2016-10-19 20:12:27+00:00): Hallo, 
Dad ist Englisch und bedeutet "Wissen".  Es soll umschreiben,  dass ich diesen Ort kenne und mit gutem Gewissen hinter der Änderung stehe.
derredu (2016-10-19 20:29:13+00:00): ah alles klar, mit einem "w"  zwischen o und l sind wir alle glücklich.
Happy mapping weiterhin