piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ianlopez1115 (2022-02-27 06:31:39+00:00): Looks okay to me; various stretches of the San Nicolas-Laoag Bypass including the ones touched in this changeset may need further refinement once open to the public
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117828884
DP24PH (2022-02-27 15:04:08+00:00): EXTRA INFORMATION: As per review, the remainder (including parts under construction) will be added thru follow-up changesets.
DP24PH (2022-02-28 02:16:50+00:00): Follow-up changeset info via https://osmcha.org/changesets/117926728
mtmail (2022-03-08 17:10:45+00:00): Hausnummer von way 278873492 in den falschen Tag geschrieben?
lonvia (2022-03-08 18:32:19+00:00): Gefixt.
ohmanger (2022-03-11 11:10:36+00:00): Just a note that Lunts has relocated to the new Riverside site and the building is now owned by The Salopian (same goes for the building to the west).
trigpoint (2022-03-14 09:24:50+00:00): Thank you, I was using some old images but have since spotted it has gone.

I really need to go and survey The Salopean :)
DD1GJ (2022-02-25 07:55:52+00:00): Teil-Revert der Stolpersteine in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117838139

Hallo joel1972,

nicht jede Warnung ist unbedingt ein Fehler, welcher eine Korrektur erfordert. Die Stolpersteine sind einzeln verlegt und werden einzeln erfasst. Auf der normalen Karte wird bei mehreren Einträgen an einer Stelle nur ein zufällig ausgewählter Name angezeigt, aber Spezialkarten zeigen alles an. Klicke auf die Symbole:

http://www.historic.place/themes/stolpersteine/index.html?zoom=15&lat=51.24966&lon=6.97271&layers=B0000TT

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Stolpersteine

Viele Grüße, Joachim
seattlefyi (2022-03-01 01:39:33+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the nice edits (and to the theatre changes in Portland). Hope to see more!
hsc666 (2022-02-25 15:17:19+00:00): Hallo Johnny424 und willkommen bei OSM!

Warum hast Du bicycle=designated auf bicycle=yes geändert? Ist das keine Fahrradstraße mehr? Sonst wäre die Änderung falsch - im anderen Fall unvollständig. Und welche Aussage möchtest Du mit horse=unknown treffen? Ist irgendeine Beschilderung vor Ort, die sich mit der Nutzung durch Pferde beschäftigt?

If you prefer to communicate in English, just let me know!

BR
hsc666
hsc666 (2022-07-31 11:42:45+00:00): CS reverted due to lack of response
wkdgs (2022-02-25 13:16:49+00:00): Hi,

kannst du erklären, was du mit deinen Änderungen erreichen wolltest? So wie es jetzt ist, ist es auf jeden Fall nicht richtig gemappt.

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117830819
DD1GJ (2022-02-25 20:44:02+00:00): Revert, "zerstörtes" Gebäude wieder hergestellt. Das hängt zusammen mit:

https://www.sauerlandkurier.de/hochsauerlandkreis/winterberg/winterberg-tv-informiert-ab-sofort-90904804.html

https://www.standpunktverlag.de/destinations-tv

https://dsd-deutschland.de/

https://www.standpunktverlag.de/destinations-tv

Die OSM-Datenbank ist dafür nicht der richtige Ort. Falls eine Karte für die Werbekunden gebraucht wird, dann verwende bitte https://umap.openstreetmap.de/
praeteritum (2022-07-10 04:01:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123418739.
seattlefyi (2022-03-01 01:40:40+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM, and thanks for the edits!
mrpulley (2024-02-15 09:42:53+00:00): Could you confirm the source for the maxspeed change? Was it the NSW Speed data used in later edits?
Harsimranjit Kaur (2024-02-15 23:03:37+00:00): This was updated based on the information provided by someone who travelled through this road.
Aglis IRM-ED (2022-12-02 01:51:05+00:00): Hi huskwhinkle, I deleted the highway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1034941988) because overlapping with another highway.  Thank you for your mapping contribution! Happy Mapping. (https://maproulette.org/challenge/30177/task/142914111)
rubinos (2022-02-25 01:19:52+00:00): Also updated speeds of Line 804
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-28 23:10:54+00:00): Looks like you accidentally tagged https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1034951423 as a building
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117832425
Glassman (2022-02-25 15:41:51+00:00): Can you explain how the northern section, basically Lynden going north, of WA539 is an expressway? It doesn't seem to fit the wiki definition - mainly because of the number of service roads that connect to Guide Meridian Road. Note that many are not mapped but still visible from imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117832499
archpdx (2022-02-25 15:55:24+00:00): Thanks for pointing this out. Looking back at this, you're right: the northern section doesn't look like an expressway. I've removed the expressway tags right once it turns into a single carriageway in Lynden.
OptikalCrow (2022-02-26 18:39:11+00:00): I feel like we need to have a community discussion for the tagging schema in Virginia before edit warring over this. The primary tagging schema in the US appears to be natural=wood rather than landuse=forest.

I've been mapping forest south around Roanoke/Lynchburg using natural=wood for forest that might technically be managed, but clearly not used for lumber. landuse=forest would be for visibly man-made sections of forest.

landuse=forest around the legal boundaries seems unnecessary- renderers already ignore the distinction between the two.

You're free to join the discussion in the OSMUS slack.
ElliottPlack (2022-03-25 03:30:30+00:00): RunTrails: This is not a correction, but rather a regression. This edit will be reverted. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5827
EP_Repair (2022-03-25 03:34:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 118889877 where the changeset comment is: reverting undiscussed landuse=forest change. see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5827
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-28 23:08:59+00:00): Please don't map incorrectly for any reason
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117832616
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-02-28 23:09:24+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117832616
mrpulley (2024-02-15 09:43:12+00:00): Could you confirm the source for the maxspeed change? Was it the NSW Speed data used in later edits?
BCNorwich (2022-02-26 08:31:26+00:00): Hi, You've duplicated a lot of sections of paths in this park. One section has three paths on top of each other. It would be better to create route relations for the different named routes. Then the route relation would hold the name rather than the path sections. No highway should be duplicated.

Need any help please just ask. Regards Bernard.
playmeforafool (2022-02-26 20:58:43+00:00): Thanks for the tip Bernard.  I had Googled a little bit beforehand in trying to decide what to do about overlapping paths, and I thought what I had found said that each should be its own complete path, but I guess you're saying that is wrong.  I'll have to figure out how to do this -- I'm completely new to this and it's my first stab at mapping.

BTW, how did you know I did this?  Is there some way to set a trigger when somebody updates something, or were you just looking around for something to do and saw my mess?

 ... Billy ...
BCNorwich (2022-02-27 08:56:52+00:00): Hi Billy, Thanks for responding. It's not a mess the learning curve went a bit astray!

I look at fixing routing problems, (among other things), and noticed the duplication problems reported here:- https://tinyurl.com/2ekrjuxf  I didn't pick this up for any particular reason I just like to help out.

Duplicated highways can mess up routing and logically there can only be one highway on the ground on any one line. To overcome the different names of routes that are on the same section of highway relations are used. Thus only one section of highway is mapped but that section can be included in several relations. Each relation holds the route name and all individual sections of highway making up that route. Various other things can be added to the relation as described here:- https://tinyurl.com/mz8h6jzj   (One thing folk often forget is that a hiking route can be over different types of highway, path, track, road, etc, a route relation can hold various types of highway.)

I hope this makes sense. Looking again at the park paths I wonder if they are routes as they don't make circles? Are they on a website?

Regards Bernard
playmeforafool (2022-03-05 21:50:07+00:00): Hi Bernard,

Thanks for cleaning up my mess.  I was going to do it, but I just could not find any good explanation on how to do it (using the iD editor) -- do you have any pointers to someplace that explains how to do it?  I had put in some additional trails at the south end of the park and I see that they are now gone for some reason.  I'd like to put them back -- but they converge in one area, and I don't want to have the duplicated paths problem again.

It's surely my inexperience, but it looks like you just removed my "duplcate" paths.  I don't see where any kind of "relations" are defined.  For instance, while editing, if I hilight a path where 3 of the trails used to overlap, if I look at the "Relations" (in the "Edit feature" window), there are no relations.  In the "Edit Features" window, at the bottom there is a link -- "View on openstreetmap.org".  If I click on that it opens a new window with that section highlighted (in this particular case it is "Way: Westside Path (1034947314)"  It says there are 46 nodes and I can kind of tell that other paths connect here, "Central Ridge" anyway, (but there is no mention of the "creekside" path being here any longer).  It's all very confusing, and I guess I just don't understand where to see these "relations" you say I should use, or how to add them.  If you have a pointer, I would GREATLY appreciate it.

 ... Billy ...
mavl (2022-05-20 15:30:00+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:30:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2022-02-25 11:27:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117845179 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism].
mavl (2022-02-25 11:27:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117845179 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism].
Kovoschiz (2022-02-25 11:24:46+00:00): Please avoid deleting and redrawing. Move them to the correct position, or use Replace Geometry on JOSM.
mavl (2022-02-25 11:27:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117845179 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism].
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-25 07:01:43+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117836955
mavl (2022-02-25 11:27:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117845179 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism].
Kovoschiz (2022-02-25 11:26:13+00:00): This is not "Redundant". `*_name=` and `*_name:*=` together shows what name it is, and the specific language. This provides compatibility to applications not recognizing other tags as well.
Mundilfari (2022-03-04 23:29:36+00:00): Hey there -what's the source you're using for the names of the bus stops? In some instances you're changing abbreviated Street names to spelled out, in others you're changing spelled out to abbreviated, in yet others you're removing the Ave/Ln/Dr/St/whatever alltogether, so I'm wondering what the source or logic is you're following. Most of these stops aren't even listed on the pace schedule pdfs...

Thanks!
mavl (2022-02-25 11:27:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117845179 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism].
mavl (2022-02-25 11:27:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117845179 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism].
mavl (2022-02-25 11:27:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 117845179 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: vandalism].
MarcoR (2022-02-25 08:20:28+00:00): Ciao!
Con questo changeset hai creato un po' di percorsi inesistenti piuttosto lunghi; per me è da annullare, che ne dici?
A presto,
Marco.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-02-25 08:22:52+00:00): Ciao. Dopo quasi 2000 changeset bisognerebbe aver imparato che su OSM si inseriscono solo feature attuali. Queste modifiche, dove sono state inserite spannometricamente strade presenti al tempo dell'impero romano, DEVONO essere revertate ASAP. Inoltre l'importazione di dati da Wikipedia non è consentita per problemi di licenza. Ciao, Andrea
corfede (2022-02-25 08:26:58+00:00): Mi aggiungo ai commenti precedenti, solo per sollecitare revert urgente. Ciao, Federico.
Gianfranco2014 (2022-02-25 08:46:27+00:00): Si, scusate, è stata una distrazione, credevo di averla già revertata.
MarcoR (2022-02-25 09:09:43+00:00): Ok, grazie per aver risolto. Con il revert era andato perduto il nome latino di Brescia, ma l'ho appena reinserito.
A presto,
Marco.
Gianfranco2014 (2022-02-25 09:51:50+00:00): Si, l'avevo inserito io, poi lo rimodificavo. Grazie.
osm915 (2022-06-20 19:05:41+00:00): Hallo Abo Kayed
are you still interested in OpenStreetMap and the requested review of your changes from four month ago?
Best regards!
osm915 (2023-04-18 19:52:43+00:00): I fixed some landuse residential with
https://osm.org/changeset/135073448
https://osm.org/changeset/135074911
julianofhernandez (2022-02-25 05:42:06+00:00): Used aerial imagery as well as mapwithai.
jumbanho (2022-02-25 12:31:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for working on the map.  In this case, I am confused as to why you removed the boundary=administrative tag from this county border.  Such tags are the correct way to denote administrative boundary.  See the wiki for a more in depth description: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative

Also, it would be helpful if you could use more helpful changeset comments so that other user know what is in the changeset and why the changes were made.
puma515 (2022-02-25 05:59:21+00:00): Auch wen man dich da schon oft drauf hingewiesen hat und du das anscheinend nicht verstehst hier nochmal in deutsch und englisch:
Keine Changsets erstellen die über den halben Planeten gehen. 

Ebenfalls wäre es sinnvoll Changset beschreibung in  Landessprache oder Englisch zu verfassen. Wen das Später mal jemand bearbeitet der wird in Russland wohl kaum verstehen was du da geschrieben hast in deutsch. 

http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Various users have already pointed out to you in the past that you should keep your edits regional.  Just save before you wax the region dan go the not constantly 
over half the planet. 

It would also make sense to write Changset description in the local language or English. If someone edits this later, you will hardly understand in Russia what you have written there in german.
Lee Carré (2022-02-25 11:24:59+00:00): @puma515

While I'm certainly not disagreeing, I think part of the problem is that his changes often span the International Date Line (longitude=180°), and whatever algorithm OSM uses to calculate the bbox does some kind of wrap-around instead.

Though, iWowik should be mindful of this (and using smaller CS areas anyway). Yet, he seems intent on ignoring the reasonable requests of other mappers, because he seems to (think he) know(s) best 🤷‍♂️.
SuzyQueue (2022-02-26 10:15:35+00:00): I can't know
fghj753 (2022-02-26 12:07:32+00:00): I'd also like to point out language use of this changeset comment. This appears to be global changeset made by russian-speaking user (see created_by value) making changes mostly in Russia (see modified objects list), yet comment on this chset is in German.

Dear iWowik, what is this changeset's connection to Germany? Why is changeset comment in German, not English or Russian?

PS. According to https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?user=iWowik , the user has been notified and confirmed receiving the information about large changesets and changesets comments since April 2021.
fghj753 (2022-02-26 12:22:01+00:00): PPS. You have previously mentioned you don't write neither reasonable changeset comments nor split changesets into smaller regions because you don't have time. However, this changeset is part of series of 17 changesets made in 2 hours. I think making two changesets, one for eastern and other for western hemisphere and including adequate changeset comments could have actually been faster than your current process.
Lee Carré (2022-02-27 15:14:23+00:00): I can only concur with @fghj753 👍
Kovoschiz (2022-02-25 11:28:38+00:00): 1. Please don't remove names. There is not a single correct answer. They only show some people are using them. 
2. Please split your changeset to smaller areas.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-25 11:29:42+00:00): 3. Some nearby features can have same names, or no names.
Lee Carré (2022-02-25 11:16:57+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
paulsaya (2022-02-25 11:42:01+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset and sharing your inputs, we always confine our edits to small geographical location. This is an honest mistake from my end, thanks for highlighting this issue. 
Going ahead, I'll ensure to not repeat such errors. Thanks again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
paulsaya
Lee Carré (2022-02-25 17:37:33+00:00): 👍🙂
hatul (2024-10-30 13:16:37+00:00): הי, מחקתי את הוידאו מהתגית operator זה ממש לא המקום שלו.
מי האחראי על הסינגל? אני מבין שכמי הלר היא היוזמת אבל היא לא המממנת והאחראית.
Tsur Halamish (2024-10-30 17:41:11+00:00): היי
נכון. כמי גייסה מתנדבים תורמים ואת הרשות המקומית.
הכנסתי עכשיו את המועצה המקומית
Zichron Yaakov Municipality
hatul (2024-10-30 17:59:15+00:00): מצוין, תודה רבה
Nakaner (2022-02-25 09:23:27+00:00): Hallo,

in diesem und einigen vorhergehenden Änderungssätzen hast du meinem Eindruck nach systematisch sämtliche "Fehlermeldungen" des iD-Editors automatisch beheben lassen. Ich möchte dich darauf hinweisen, dass das blinde, zum Teil einfach sinnlose, Anwenden von Fehlerkorrekturen ein mechanischer Edit ist und als solcher unter die Regelungen des Automated Edits Code of Conduct (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct) fällt.

Die Validierungsregeln des iD-Editor sind in mehreren Punkten umstritten und ohne ausreichende Konsultation der OSM-Community entstanden. Beispielsweise schlägt der iD-Editor vor, bei Objekten FIXME=* durch fixme=* zu ersetzen. Beide Tags sind gleichbedeutend. Durch das Ersetzen des Keys fügst du null Mehrwert hinzu, suggerierst aber Datennutzern, dass das Objekt aktuell ist, weil es nun den Zeitstempel der letzten Änderung trägt.

Ich bitte dich daher, nicht einfach blind und wie ein Roboter vom iD-Editor ganze Gegenden zu "reinigen". Als Mapper bist du für deine Beiträge verantwortlich.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-25 07:01:53+00:00): revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117836955
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-02-25 07:02:29+00:00): sorry, revert of https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117833770
Rogoyski (2023-08-10 20:24:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436174113

Dwa razy dodawałeś surface do tej drogi, dwa razy inaczej i dwa razy źle.  I sądząc po zakresie tego zestawu mam spore wątpliwości, czy w ogóle byłeś na miejscu.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-25 11:13:36+00:00): Please don't remove unnamed features. They still exist.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-25 11:22:02+00:00): 2. Please don't attach other features on roads. This doesn't reflect reality, and makes editing difficult. 
3. Please split your changesets to localized areas
Free gems 8 (2022-02-25 11:27:33+00:00): for unnamed features, i've checked these 'peaks' doesnt have an official name.
It should be a part of the ridge only, but not an independent peak that is observable.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-26 11:27:42+00:00): What does that even mean? If it is a high point, it is a `=peak`. This has nothing to do with the ridge. See Talk:Tag:natural=peak#Not_all_mountains_or_hill_have_peaks reply/
Kovoschiz (2022-02-26 11:34:03+00:00): Let alone the fact you haven't added the `=ridge` here.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-26 16:31:50+00:00): Also you should not based your conclusion on "official name".
GOwin (2022-02-25 10:04:23+00:00): Thank you for contributing to OSM, and helping make better maps.

Try not to use abbreviations on object names. See https://osm.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_.28don.27t_do_it.29

To learn more about OSM, check out: https://osm.org/​wiki/​Beginners'_guide or the self-paced learning modules from https://learnosm.org.
jcr83 (2022-02-25 09:45:07+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avez-vous passé le chemin de la Grimette en highway=service ?
C'est un chemin qui a un nom, qui est bordé de maisons, pour moi c'est donc un highway=residential.
gilbert Aeschelmann (2022-02-27 07:23:39+00:00): Bonjour. De nombreux chemins d'accès privés qui donnent accès à une seule maison sont marqués en residential alors qu'il devraient l'être en service ou track. Lorsque ces chemins desservent plusieurs maison, c'est moins évident. Il y a des chemins ayant un nom et bordés de maisons qui sont tellement étroits qu'il est impossible d'y faire demi-tour. Il s'agit alors plutôt de ruelles qui devraient être marquées en service. En ce qui concerne le chemin de Grimette vous avez sans doute raison.
Syl (2022-09-30 22:47:59+00:00): Bonjour, j'ai annulé ces modifications, vous aviez supprimé un bâtiment qui a toujours l'air d'exister.
Vinber (2022-02-28 08:55:22+00:00): Bonjour,
je ne connais pas les habitudes sur les giratoire mais pourquoi ne pas mettre le nom sur le https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22816631#map=16/44.7825/-0.5669 ?

Il semble que le wiki soit ok : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:junction=roundabout?uselang=fr

à plus
BCNorwich (2022-02-25 19:17:35+00:00): The gardens should be tagged as gardens, that is what they are, that is what you have said. It is OSM practice to map the overall area as residential.
J-MUC (2022-02-25 09:56:48+00:00): To be precise: It is only the spelling of the street name in the address tag that has been changed so as to match the spelling of the street the building is located on (which seems to be the proper Dutch spelling).
GeoMechain (2022-02-25 09:51:24+00:00): Ce changeset a été entièrement annulé par le changeset 117841777.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117840232
RicoElectrico (2022-02-25 11:26:59+00:00): Cześć, ten słupek został przesunięty na dużą odległość:

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/4239911946
uprawniony (2022-02-25 12:23:41+00:00): Przesunąłem go przypadkowo podczas przesuwania mapy. Już poprawiłem. Dzięki za zwrócenie uwagi.
RicoElectrico (2022-02-25 12:36:25+00:00): Dziękuję za poprawę :)
mavl (2022-05-20 15:29:36+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
shanhulittle (2022-02-26 13:13:13+00:00): 不清楚您大规模删除建筑的原因是什么，它们大部分并不是低劣的标注。这属于破坏行为！
Fnkok (2022-02-26 14:15:42+00:00): 所以畫的歪七扭八，和道路、行政區邊界以及公車站、餐館等貼在一起的建築不是低劣標註？
shanhulittle (2022-02-26 13:15:00+00:00): 不清楚您大规模删除建筑的原因是什么，它们大部分并不是低劣的标注。这属于破坏行为！