piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dieterdreist (2022-10-17 18:04:12+00:00): Ciao, ho notato che hai dato il nome magazzini generali alla scuola superiore dei VVF, era intenzionale? way 96646927

saluti 
Martin
AlCeRoma (2022-10-18 07:24:36+00:00): è il nome che compare sulla facciata dell'edificio
dieterdreist (2022-10-18 07:55:21+00:00): hai ragione, ma forse non è comunque il nome di questo edificio (suppongo senza saperne niente che si riferisca ad un uso pregresso di tutta l’area? Forse old_name? Senza sapere niente di più, si potrebbe mettere magazzini generali come tag “inscription” dell’edificio. Cosa ne pensi?
AlCeRoma (2022-10-18 08:48:18+00:00): Ovviamente lì non ci sono più i magazzini generali della dogana. old_name può andare bene
dieterdreist (2022-10-18 10:18:57+00:00): sì, ma old_name dove? Sull’edificio sarebbe riferito al edificio, mentre probabilmente andrebbe su tutto il sito, però poi magazzini generali non è il vecchio nome della scuola superiore dei vigili del fuoco (tag che sta sull’area). 
(al proposito, c’è anche una stazione dei VVF, o no?)
AlCeRoma (2022-10-18 14:31:50+00:00): volendo si può mettere all'intera area specificando che in passato il sito aveva un altro uso (c'è un tag specifico che però non ricordo).
No, non c'è una stazione dei vigili all'interno.
dieterdreist (2022-10-18 15:26:04+00:00): sì, questo lo conosco ed avevo pensato anch’io che sarebbe una ipotesi, creare una area per quello che era, il concetto lo trovi nel wiki sotto “lifecycle prefix”, potrebbe essere “was:landuse=industrial” (forse esiste qualcosa di meglio per le aree doganali, non lo so), e a questo punto anche mettere il nome in “name” e non in old_name. Sarebbe un modo corretto ma c’è chi non vuole dati storici. Se per te va bene, metterei in inscription sul building, che è questo indiscutibile (esiste ora), che ne dici?

saluti 
Martin
AlCeRoma (2022-10-19 07:31:48+00:00): Eviterei di creare una nuova area solo per mettere dati storici. Meglio old_name o inscription sull'edificio già presente.
dieterdreist (2022-10-19 07:50:28+00:00): perfetto, d’accordo con te.
eggie (2022-07-29 10:50:59+00:00): Beste Xyberion..  Welk bord staat er vooraan bij het nieuwe fietspad in Langerak dat eindigt op een erf van een boerderij dat met de Lekdijk is verbonden.
Op de meest recente luchtfoto zie ik geen fietspad?

Welicht een highwat=path? En is het openbaar?

Graag reactie,
eggie
Xyberion (2022-07-29 12:25:47+00:00): Beste Eggie,

Ik ben hier afgelopen week langsgefietst. Aan de zijde van de boerderij staat op het erf een eet/drinkgelegenheid. Het erf is voor iedereen toegankelijk. Aan het einde van het erf staat een (zelfgemaakt) houten bord met de tekst "fietspad door boomgaard". 
Ik ben het pad niet afgefietst, maar zag op beelden van mapillary dat er in eerdere jaren een G13-bord staat aan de kant van de Tiendweg. Er staat daar ook een hek, dus ik weet niet of dit fietspad het hele jaar toegankelijk is of enkel in het seizoen, maar op dit moment kan er in ieder geval gefietst worden.

Groet Wouter
eggie (2022-07-29 12:29:24+00:00): Mooi Wouter.. in ieder geval weer actueler.
Groet
Eggie
Lehmi65 (2022-07-23 18:24:40+00:00): Danke!
gscholz (2022-07-27 05:18:12+00:00): Hi Cyndia ,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=32.56671&lat=-25.91767&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123985137

Can you please fix this? The barriers you have added also overlap each other, can you please fix this as well?
Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-08-01 05:28:59+00:00): Hi Cyndia, 
these errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
gscholz (2022-08-09 07:26:03+00:00): Hi Cyndia,
the duplicate nodes and the overlapping barriers still exist. Can you please educate yourself about how to use the internal validator of JOSM to prevent uploading such errors:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

A feedback here would be nice as well.
Guido
marc__marc (2022-08-31 14:08:12+00:00): Bonjour,
2 ambassades de France au même endroit ?
et est-ce que votre éditeur est à jour car la manière de décrire un objet (on parle de tag dans OpenStreetMap) l'ancien tag, modifié il y a plus de 3 ans
Cordialement,
Marc
LockOnGuy (2022-07-24 01:58:48+00:00): Why did you removed the Arabic names?
Glassman (2022-07-26 15:47:46+00:00): I added the tag amenity=boat_rental. We don't have a good tag for sail boat cruises but this should help people find your business. I'll send you more info on OSM in a message.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123985672
4004 (2022-07-23 22:01:49+00:00): перекрыта в этом месте https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9906289037 ? чем, забором?
Y_Ruslan (2022-07-25 08:24:42+00:00): Да, забор почти до реки. Проезда нет уже года два. Могу фото прислать
4004 (2022-07-25 21:10:29+00:00): ну, забор уже отмечен. удалил ворота и разрезал дорогу
Allison P (2022-07-27 02:56:00+00:00): building=commercial is used for restaurants. It is not retail, and it is certainly not industrial.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:25:27+00:00): I’m sorry what are you talking about? I just added the name address and restaurant tag.
Allison P (2022-07-27 20:35:02+00:00): You changed Classic's Burgers to building=yes from building=commercial. Maybe the editor did it for you (and it can be unintuitive), but you need to make sure to check those things. I switched it back, though.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:38:06+00:00): Thanks. You’re much nicer about this than other OSM mods
Allison P (2022-07-27 20:41:08+00:00): I am not a moderator. I don't believe any moderators have talked to you, just other contributors. This is a very decentralized effort and so you can't guarantee that everyone has infinite patience. If people are being abusive you can use the site's report feature, of course.
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:44:15+00:00): Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
Noen (2022-07-23 20:02:33+00:00): Legg gjerne til stisynlighet på utydelige stier.(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:trail_visibility)
Inochi03 (2022-08-09 18:47:58+00:00): Czy https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/591889350 rzeczywiście się tak nazywa?
szydzio (2023-03-19 15:42:53+00:00): Ta nazwa jest nieformalna, przesunąłem do loc_name w zestawie #133863065.
Yog Sot (2023-04-19 23:05:10+00:00): @szydzio , tak, nazwa jest nieformalna. 
no cóż, juz się nie wyświetla z tego powodu, ale masz racje iż tag ten jest po to by go tak stosować
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
emersonveenstra (2022-07-23 19:32:49+00:00): Hi,

Did you forget to add tags to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1080808225 ?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123987198
Osmwithspace (2023-07-12 20:39:01+00:00): Hallo,
fire_hydrant:diameter:signed=250 ist meines Erachtens nicht sinnvoll. Wenn der Durchmesser nicht auf einem Schild angegeben ist, kann fire_hydrant:diameter:signed=no verwendet werden.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9676050303
Grüße Osmwithspace
lapushkin (2022-07-23 19:28:20+00:00): Несколько вопросов:
1) Как лучше обозначить магазин с товарами для животных? Я поставил shop=pet, но самих животных там не продают. Shop=agrarian тоже не подходит, потому что никаких семян и комбайнов там тоже не найти.
2) возможно ли использовать для indoor-отрисовки планы пожарной эвакуации?
3) стоит ли без планов приблизительно нарисовать коридоры и лестницу для лучшей навигации?
MxxCon (2022-07-24 17:57:30+00:00): What does it mean "tracks and streams"? This comment doesn't help others understand what you are editing here, especially considering your changeset bbox is spawning most of US
bradrh (2022-07-25 15:41:35+00:00): Agree with MxxCon.  changeset is too big, and comment is vague.
Alan Bragg (2022-07-25 16:05:06+00:00): I agree with both comments. The changeset includes streams and tracks that were traced in a small section of a Sitgraeves NF in Arizona and a minor node change on Cape Cod, MA. Should have used a second changeset. I appologize.
bradrh (2022-07-25 16:20:52+00:00): :)
orthocircular (2022-12-26 22:21:04+00:00): Hi Dr. Kludge! I'm updating a few US airport transit systems and added the 24th St and Rental Car stations to the SkyTrain, however in this commit I see we're going back and forth about the definition of tram vs monorail.

As we so often find in OSM, the tag name that some Europeans came up with has very different meanings and implications from the word's common meaning in American English.

When OSM says monorail, they mean a small system that's typically elevated, whether or not the carriages actually hang onto a single rail or not, like the Miami Metromover (which is a people mover nearly identical to the SkyTrain). 

When OSM says tram, they mean a really small street-running light rail, what we would call a streetcar or trolley. The fact that we happen to call airport peoplemovers and aerial gondolas "trams" thus making for a bunch of confusion doesn't change how the OSM database and data consumers will treat the public transit system we document: for example, a tram (streetcar) is more likely to be a citywide system that interfaces with streets and has municipal fare collection and timetables, whereas a monorail (people mover) is more likely to be a free-of-charge way of accessing a district or infrastructure especially over dense or varied terrain, without published timetables or branching routes.

Just another one of those Britishisms we have to shoehorn into our system, like primary/tertiary/trunk roads and 0-based building levels, I guess.

I'm not going to undo your changes since I know how much of a pain it is to get OSM public transit working at all (I just edited Orlando's people movers a few dozen times and OsmAnd is still buggy) but please just be aware that the correct tagging for the Skytrain will almost certainly end up being monorail and not tram. This will allow for future improvements such as apps not making transit assumptions that are invalid for people movers. (I'd love for "walking directions" to just automatically include hopping on an airport peoplemover, for example, rather than having to get routed out to a main road and then switch over to "public transit" mode to "board a train" that arrives every 90 seconds on nonsensically-alternating platforms, etc etc.)

Here's the best reference I was able to find breaking out the differences: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Railways#Types_of_railway_line

If you want to see what's globally tagged as what, here's some handy overpass queries:

https://overpass-turbo.eu/?template=key-value&key=route&value=monorail

https://overpass-turbo.eu/?template=key-value&key=route&value=tram

Cheers and thanks for all your work making OSM and Phoenix better!
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-07-23 20:11:16+00:00): Jeśli to możliwe - możesz opisywać co zostało zmienione a nie gdzie? Lokalizacja jest automatycznie zapisana na podstawie edytowanych obiektów więc nie ma potrzeby tego powtarzać.
Rogoyski (2022-08-13 21:42:46+00:00): Oczywiśie, że jest CPR. Zob. choćby http://mapa.um.warszawa.pl/mapaApp1/mapa?service=rowery&L=PL&X=7499386.758725002&Y=5788682.972341673&S=16&O=d_szybka_podklad_orto&T=033e0780x38
Famlam (2022-07-23 20:14:56+00:00): Zie ook https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3275201
eggie (2022-07-23 20:19:04+00:00): Mooi... Je bent wel een eind uit de route 😀
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
giggls (2022-08-05 10:07:19+00:00): You deleted a couple of burned campsites in this changeset.
Not a good idea!
You should have tagged them as:

disused:tourism = campsite
or even
abandoned:tourism = campsite
and landuse=brownfield

How many sites did you delete? I intend to recover them and tag them as brownfield.
AurélienQ (2022-08-06 08:41:44+00:00): I changed the 5 campsites around the Dune du Pilat
giggls (2022-08-06 08:44:26+00:00): OK. I will recover them as brownfields then.
frosm (2024-09-19 14:56:33+00:00): sont-ils tous abandonné ?
Le petit nice par ex a réouvert, je viens d'en avoir la confirmation au téléphone
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465768969/history

ce serrait à mon avis prudent de téléphoner ou vérifier les médias sociaux des 4 autres

par ailleurs aucun des sites ne me semble être des ruines historiques, aucun archéologue ne viendra à mon avis fouiller voir examiner les ruines de l'année 2022
AurélienQ (2024-09-20 16:26:08+00:00): C'était il y a deux ans, maintenant je ne connais pas l'état actuel des campings. N'hésite surtout pas à mettre à jour ces campings si tu as des informations plus récentes.

Par ailleurs, une ruine sur OSM n'est pas une ruine archéologique, mais bien qu'une ruine :)

Bonne journée,
Aurélien
dpolovinkin (2025-11-17 14:03:17+00:00): hi, regarding those "ruins" or whatever, like this one - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/179397904/history#map=19/44.585497/-1.208768

on 2024 map its not there, and no ruins or anything left, so why does this object should still be there if nothing exists there anymore?.. the same thing about object nearby which don't exist, according to the latest satellite?

for me looks like those previous buildings which don't have anything left after them - should be removed from OSM, I'd say..
giggls (2025-11-17 14:14:56+00:00): Feel free to follow the "on the ground" rule.
marc__marc (2025-11-17 16:37:52+00:00): lorsqu'il n'y a plus rien sur le terrain et plus rien sur l'imagerie sat, c'est normal d'effacer l’objet. mais il y a 3 ans le lendemain du feu, il y avait des ruines et ce n'était pas une bonne idée de tout effacer. ils auraient été rajouté depuis la vue satellite, d'autant que comme dit dans un précédent message, au moins un des campings a réparer/rouvert
dpolovinkin (2025-11-18 17:59:08+00:00): Got it, thx for the info! :) will then remove those buildings which definitely look like there is nothing there
chris66 (2023-06-01 07:42:40+00:00): Hi,
Hauptstraße Dietersdorf noch gesperrt?

Grüße
Chris
dx125 (2023-06-06 18:37:18+00:00): "B2 in Dietersdorf bleibt länger gesperrt als geplant - MAZ
17. Mai 2023 Die Ortsdurchfahrt der B2 in Dietersdorf bleibt länger als geplant gesperrt wegen umfangreicher Bauarbeiten. Für die Verzögerung gibt es verschiedene Gründe. ..." Moin Cris,
Artikel ist relativ neu, aber hinter der Bezahlschranke. Ich kenne die Baustelle etwas, war zuletzt im Februar dort.
Insgesamt scheint es einen Trend zu geben hin zu kleineren Streckenabschnitten, die immer überdimensionierter und damit teuer werden und immer länger dauern in der Fertigstellung. Dietersdorf passt ins Bild.
user_2066394 (2022-07-24 09:55:09+00:00): Was passiert da genau?
skyper (2022-08-02 15:34:16+00:00): Hallo FreDu55
Mit dem Löschen von Wegen wäre ich vorsichtig, vorallem wenn sie noch auf Luftbildern und/oder Hintergrundkarten (ALKIS) vorhanden sind. Da empfiehlt es sich einen Lebenzykluspräfix zu verwenden wie `disused:`, `abandoned` oder `razed:`. Auch heißt "zugewachsen" ja wohl nicht, dass der Weg komplett aufgegeben ist, eventuell kommt ein Traktor da noch durch. Ist eigentlich der gesamte Weg zugewachsen oder doch nur der nordöstliche Teil?
Ich habe die Löschung mal rückgängig gemacht und `disused:highway=track` verwendet.
Viele Grüße,
skyper

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124397564
FreDu55 (2022-08-03 19:23:51+00:00): Hallo Skyper,
ich bin nicht mal zu Fuß  da durch gekommen, gebe dir aber recht, dass es nicht der komplette Weg ist. Lassen wir das erst mal so, wie es jetzt nach der Rücknahme meiner Änderung ist. Werde in ein paar Monaten nochmal nachsehen, wie es sich hier entwickelt hat.
Es ist hier in der Gegend so, dass aufgrund Waldarbeiten im Zusammenhang mit Borkenkäferbefall einige Wege nicht mehr erkennbar / passierbar sind, ob das nur vorübergehend ist kann ich nicht beurteilen.
Viele Grüße
skyper (2022-08-04 11:38:44+00:00): Hallo FreDu55,
wenn nur ein Teil zugewachsen ist, sollte die Linie geteilt werden.
Wirklich rückgängig, habe ich Deine Änderung nicht gemacht. Das ist weiterhin kein Weg, nur ist das Objekt nicht gelöscht. Dadurch kannst Du es leichter wieder ändern, falls nötig, und andere Personen tragen so den Weg nicht erneut ein. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/329250289)
Grüße skyper
besthotelsbooking (2022-07-23 20:47:38+00:00): https://www.topchoicetrips.com/hotels/
rarad74 (2022-07-24 11:47:18+00:00): Please do not use again in Romania mapwithai because is crap. Or at least filter bad drawed building and retain only correct drawed buildings. Thank you.
highflyer74 (2022-08-01 12:04:25+00:00): Moin!

Nur zur Info: hier sind Geometriefehler durch sich selbst überschneidende Landuses entstanden. Eigentlich sollte JOSM vor dem Hochladen darauf hinweisen. Ich habe es repariert :-)

Viele Grüße!
divaddivag (2022-07-25 23:46:28+00:00): Bonjour Nzau, je viens de rebasculer en highway=track l'ancien chemin agricole qui est désormais asphalté (sous les gravillons) et dont l’indirection de circuler commence au niveau de l'entrée du site d'aéromodélisme. Cela plusieurs fois que je le prend à vélo donc merci de m'avoir fais connaitre cette alternative à la D126! bien à toi. David
Nzau (2022-08-14 16:48:55+00:00): Bonjour David,

Je pense qu'il vaut mieux laisser le highway en cycleway non ? Puisqu'il s'agit désormais réellement d'un tronçons prévu pour les cycles ( barrière ne laissant passer que les vélos au niveau de la Route de Rots).
Et je pense qu'en la laissant en track les gps pour les vélos comme Géovélo ne l'identifieront pas comme une bonne alternative à la D126 qui est plutôt dense en circulation.
Dit moi si je me trompe merci bonne journée.
Nzau (2022-08-14 17:00:13+00:00): Finalement je pense que l'attribut path et le mieux pour le chemin.
Dis moi ce que tu en penses merci.
divaddivag (2022-08-14 20:32:31+00:00): Salut Nzau, ok va pour le cycleway sur la partie plaine (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/146724707) cela sera plus explicite: c'est pas à nous de pallier au manquements de signalisation par Caen la Mer! Pour infos tu peux te joindre au canal telegram 'osmvelo', les gens de Carto'Cité ou Géovélo y sont présent et peuvent répondre à toutes sortes de questions techniques autour du vélo. Sinon est-tu passé récemment par Verson car il y a environ 1 mois il semblait y a voir du changement avec la piste cyclable sur trottoir?  
Bien à toi David
snopas24 (2022-07-23 23:15:49+00:00): *7-14
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
gscholz (2022-08-01 05:28:18+00:00): Hi Cyndia,
your recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines and duplicate nodes:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=32.56671&lat=-25.91767&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123990464

Can you please fix this? The barriers you have added also overlap each other, can you please fix this as well? As you are using JOSM, could you just use its internal validator before uploading to eliminate those errors upfront?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

Kind regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-08-05 05:42:42+00:00): Hi Cyndia, 
those errors still exist, can I get your feedback here?
Guido
rem73 (2022-07-25 07:31:36+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci pour avoir effectué cette correction.
Pouvez-vous me dire si, et le cas échéant quand, elle sera reprise sous OpenTopoMap ? Car pour le moment l'emplacement du sommet "Serre Orel 2137 m"  y est toujours à sa position erronée.
Fabe56 (2022-07-25 12:15:01+00:00): Bonjour,
Idéalement 
 à valider avec les admins de OpenTopoMap, mais la réplication peut prendre de 24-48h à plusieurs semaines selon leur configuration.
rem73 (2022-07-25 17:29:58+00:00): OK noté ; le délai n'est fondamentalement pas un problème, le tout est que la modif./correction effectuée sous OpenStreetMap finisse par être bien reprise/intégrée sur OpenTopoMap (ce qui me semblait le cas d'après ce que j'ai compris au fil de la lecture des traductions automatiques de l'allemand à l'anglais des info du site OTM...vu que  tout y est en allemand).
wkdgs (2022-07-27 08:22:15+00:00): Hi,

kannst du bei deinen Änderungen einen kurzen Kommentar hinterlassen, der beschreibt was du geändert hast und wieso?

Daher auch hier die Frage wieso der Punkt gelöscht wurde?

Gruß
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123991028
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
user_2066394 (2022-07-23 23:56:31+00:00): Wie hast du da das Tagging korrigiert?
user_2066394 (2022-07-23 23:59:17+00:00): Hat sich erledigt, war zu weit westlich.
Kai Johnson (2024-03-26 15:25:10+00:00): Hi! I hear you've been working on moving the historical alignments of Route 66 over to OHM. This is great stuff and will make a great addition to the historical map. When you get to a point that you're happy with the migration, it would be nice to remove the historical features that no longer exist from OSM. If you'd like help with that at some point, just let me know!
Allison P (2022-07-27 02:51:49+00:00): Why did you remove building=detached from the house?
EddieRoqueStudioArt (2022-07-27 20:23:17+00:00): I didn’t remove anything just added the name and address.
Allison P (2022-07-27 20:41:51+00:00): It was probably the editor then. I readded the tag for you.
andrewsuzuki (2023-01-03 16:57:41+00:00): Are ways 701004264 and 93968317 (Norwich Avenue) really cycleway:both=lane? On Bing they look like standard shoulders to me, not bike lanes.
snopas24 (2022-07-23 23:15:34+00:00): *7-14
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-06 12:27:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124559774 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some changes in the USA, at least some of which used invalid sources.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6177 for more details.
NorthCrab (2022-12-29 00:55:23+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/230266063/history
Czy to wrotkowisko jest zamknięte? access=no
eggie (2022-07-24 05:02:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlock_gate

Kijk nog eens hier naar de wiki. Wellicht heb je daar iets aan. 
De sluisdeur zelf bevindt zich niet hier. Dit is de kolk. 

het stukje waterway-canal:
lock=yes
name=Het Nieuwe Verlaat

Op de sluisdeuren geen naam.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community