piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:39:28+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91251844
Illio (2021-01-06 11:35:54+00:00): Ten heliport vyzerá byť zakreslený trochu inde než je podľa ortofotomapy. Taktiež, bolo by možné využiť funkciu "usporiadať do kruhu", nech to nevyzerá ako taký zemiak?
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:39:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91251957
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:38:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91252068
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:38:57+00:00): Please id shortcut Q to make the build square
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91252068
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:38:14+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91252355
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:36:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91252366
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:35:35+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91252384
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:33:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91252400
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:34:00+00:00): Can you fix the edit ?
Building edit doesn't look good.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91252400
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:32:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91252403
seewäldler (2020-09-22 14:19:11+00:00): Hallo kronos136!
war das Absicht den Briefkasten ans Neubaugebiet zu verschieben? Oder ist der noch an der alten Stelle?
rene78 (2020-12-22 14:20:26+00:00): Hab's rückgängig gemacht.
PT-53 (2020-12-22 14:59:48+00:00): "120 neue Mietwohnungen" ist wohl auch nicht OSM-Konform
DaveF (2020-10-15 16:18:41+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/762162076
Please don't delete valid data. 
Mapping as you did meant passengers had to pass through the elevator to get to the steps.
Cucazer (2020-09-21 23:09:39+00:00): Changed from steles to war memorials, as it is their primary task. Can be changed back to steles or be used as multivalue.
The inscriptions for bigger steles, unfortunately, exceed the limit of 255 characters, so I left the URL with all texts. Can be transformed to Wikidata objects with inscription key.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:31:39+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91252767
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:32:08+00:00): Please using key shortcut Q for 90 buildings.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91252767
Mateusz Konieczny (2020-09-22 06:21:43+00:00): Dzięki wielkie!
seewäldler (2020-09-22 12:33:34+00:00): Hallo kronos136
Ich habe dieses deines changeset revertiert, da waren ganz wild die Straßen verbogen und Schilder verschoben..... schaust du dir noch mal an, was du eigentlich machen wolltest?
mueschel (2020-09-22 18:33:07+00:00): Hi
please check this import. Many of the ways have a large amount of foreign tags that don't look like they should be in OSM.

Thanks!
AlaskaDave (2020-09-22 22:58:39+00:00): Yes, I know. I strip those tags before uploading. Did I forget to do this for a section of coastline? Can you provide an OSM ID for a section that still has the foreign tags?

Thank you.
mueschel (2020-09-23 16:22:05+00:00): There are 16 ways with the tags:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Yjy
AlaskaDave (2020-09-23 23:46:29+00:00): Thank you. I removed the extra tags. I must have forgotten to do it earlier.

I'm curious to know how you happened to notice these tags? There are so few people mapping in Alaska it always amazes me to get a comment on one of my changesets.

Thanks again.
mueschel (2020-09-24 07:13:01+00:00): I have to disappoint you, but I'm not mapping in Alaska specifically. There's a script running that looks for new keys in the database:
http://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
AlaskaDave (2020-09-24 12:03:57+00:00): I'm not disappointed. 

 I was curious to know how you noticed my "New tags" in Alaska seeing as most of your OSM mapping work is elsewhere.

You have answered that question and satisfied my curiosity.

Thanks for sharing the information.
AlaskaDave (2020-09-24 12:09:30+00:00): Actually, while your script is interesting, I'm not sure I would want to look at it every day and see all the strange keys people create. The flexibility offered by the OSM platform encourages users to invent any old tag they like. It must drive you crazy sometimes.
nevw (2020-09-22 01:23:00+00:00): Hi
welcome to the OpenStreetMap.
The name tag is only for things that really have a name not for the residents name. 
I have removed the name.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name
PT-53 (2020-09-22 06:58:27+00:00): Hallo  RC-Tours,
Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz u.a. an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/194773684/history
mehrere Access-Merkmale ergänzt, die alle unnötig sind.

Hier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany
kannst Du nachschauen, welche Access-Regeln bei welchen Wege-Arten als Standart gelten.
Nur davon durch Verkehrszeichen festgelegte Abweichungen sollten in OSM eingetragen werden.

Grüße
RC-Tours (2020-09-22 12:54:11+00:00): Vielen Dank für den Hinweis und die Tabelle.

Also das nächste mal einfach "Track" auswählen und fertig? Standardmäßig wäre dann Motorcar= no, soweit ich mich erinnere. Laut Tabelle müßte es jedoch "destination" heißen?
pantierra (2020-09-22 09:06:36+00:00): What is the copyright permission or license of the source data?
pantierra (2020-09-22 17:31:05+00:00): Thank you, tsuell for mapping in OpenStreetMap and adding this valuable information to it. 

I want to report back, as I reached out to tsuell directly and received this statement on lack of copyright permission:

> I got from the city council for free (it saiys it was done with funds from the municipality of Toscana - intenational collaboration funds in 2013), it lacks any mention of copyright or licence

Thus, the source has no proper permission, neither there has been any consultation in the community, where this would have been easily spotted.

Unfortunately, as far as I see, this changeset needs to be deleted.
kartonage (2021-01-02 17:24:36+00:00): All 3 changesets have been reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96817182 due to the aforementioned copyright issues.

Further instructions and ways to move forward are also mentioned in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/4643 
For further reference the Import Guidelines may also be of interest (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines).

Best regards
PT-53 (2020-09-22 06:52:46+00:00): Hallo RC-Tours,
wenn dieser Weg 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/672718571/history
wirklich nur einen Meter breit ist, dann können dort keine 2-spurige Fehrzeuge wie z.B. ein Traktor fahren. Somit wäre die Einstufung als Track (Feld- bzw. Waldweg) falsch und Path *) die passendere Einstufung.
*) eventuell mit bicycle=no, da (in Baden-Württemberg) Radfahren  im Wald erst aber einer Wegbreite von 2 m erlaubt ist.

Wiki - Track:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dtrack
Wiki - Path:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dpath

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-10-04 09:57:59+00:00): erledigt
Jakka (2020-09-22 08:43:18+00:00): This is not correct, the landuse is no militairy this are historic information. Please do not add this kind of information. Openstreetmap is database where you can see/verify in real live .
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-09-23 15:07:54+00:00): Hey @Benculp00,

Just a small reminder that everything on OpenStreetMap is visible for everyone.

If you want to map 'historical' events, have a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Historical_Map

Alternatively, private maps can be made on umap.openstreetmap.fr/

Kind regards, Pieter
Jakka (2020-09-24 07:16:48+00:00): https://openhistoricalmap.org/diary
https://openhistoricalmap.org
yadathot (2020-09-22 01:53:49+00:00): Modified Residential Road as per Private Maxar imagery.
ovruni (2020-09-22 03:25:26+00:00): Hola, gracias por contribuir en OSM. He notado que en esta edición se ha ingresado una vía que se superpone a varias calles existentes, por este motivo se ha revertido esta edición. Si se encuentra interesado en ingresar una ruta, puede revisar la documentación sobre relaciones [0] de tipo ruta [1]. Por otra parte, la etiqueta public_transport=platform [2] se encuentra destinada para los lugares donde las personas esperan el transporte público.
Si tiene alguna duda sobre como mapear, puede hacerla por el canal de telegram https://t.me/osmpe o la lista de correos de la comunidad de OSM en Perú https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Saludos 
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Relaciones
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:public_transport%3Dplatform
mavl (2020-09-22 13:48:29+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок меняет название типографии с "Тобольская типография" на "Моя территория". Также добавляет пояснение description=Молодёжный центр.  
  
"Моя территория" уже обозначена на карте:  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5581947491/history  
  
Изменения, сделанные в этом пакет правок, отменены.
MikeN (2020-09-22 02:38:33+00:00): Hi, these subdivisions were not tagged as place=suburb , but instead using the suggested place=neighborhood.  Why were the place tags removed?  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Neighbourhood
MakeItBetter (2020-09-22 03:02:41+00:00): A convention for subdivisions I've observed is to mark them as residential areas instead of the larger neighborhoods of a city/town to avoid confusion.
MikeN (2020-09-22 11:33:43+00:00): These subdivisions are already marked inside a landuse area and there is no ambiguity about where the place tag applies.   There are many thousands of such subdivisions already tagged this way in OSM.
  Nodes marked as 'place' however do introduce name association in other unincorporated parts of the county.
MakeItBetter (2020-09-22 18:42:37+00:00): Planned subdivisions are very different from suburbs and neighborhoods. There is not yet a place=subdivision, and as such should forego a place marker (see apartment complex example on this page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dresidential). 
While there are other subdivisions labeled as Neighborhood, this is a common mistake due to the difference between colloquial North American definitions of Suburb/Neighborhood (and lack of subdivision tag) and OSM's definitions. Please familiarize yourself with the OSM definitions of Suburb and Neighborhood and help negate confusion by removing unnecessary place=neighborhood tags. Hopefully we get a place=subdivision soon. Best regards!
Minh Nguyen (2020-09-22 22:18:07+00:00): Named landuse=residential areas are the best way to map these residential developments, since they have well-defined boundaries and usually well-known names and are predominately given over to a single kind of land use.

However, I’m not sure I’d go so far as to say place=neighbourhood is never warranted for an American-style planned development. These developments can vary in from a few houses to the size of a small city and can be further subdivided into named sections. Some subdivisions have corresponding census-designated places (boundary=census) due to their population or relative isolation.

(By the way, note that these signposted subdivisions are usually distinct from the legal subdivisions tracked by county tax authorities. Typically a developer combines multiple legal subdivisions to create a marketable subdivision. These legal subdivisions have names that a resident would only see when looking at their title. I don’t know if anyone has mapped them systematically, but that might also be a poor candidate for place=* nodes.)
MikeN (2020-09-23 02:09:06+00:00): There is a mix of opinions - more discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2020-September/020621.html
MikeN (2020-09-23 23:52:02+00:00): Some OSM tags go in a direction that doesn't correspond to any usage elsewhere.  For example,  there is not a 1:1 translation from the US Highway Functional Classification system and the OSM highway tagging conventions.  place=neighborhood seems to be such a tag.   I'd recommend not removing marked neighborhoods for now, but if there is a better replacement in the future, just change those that should be changed to the new tag at that time.
MakeItBetter (2020-09-23 23:55:08+00:00): Thank you all for the discussion. I believe it could be helpful to add place=subdivision or even US versions/definitions.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 08:53:32+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91255325
user_6771650 (2020-10-06 17:37:08+00:00): Hi solongago,

a lot of the information you've added in changesets like this have `name=` tags showing ownership or even private names. This is absolutely not suitable for OpenStreetMap, as explained [here](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Limitations_on_mapping_private_information) and [here](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name%20is%20the%20name%20only). I'm going to ask you to remove the `name=*` tags or place the information in better tags like `operator`.
user_2066394 (2020-09-22 11:10:47+00:00): Ist das ein privater Garten?
user_5359 (2020-09-22 03:47:25+00:00): Hello! Please add religion and denormination (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:religion) to the church.
tonyf1 (2020-09-22 04:40:58+00:00): Hi, I have only the information that was on the sign.  That included a url sos.org which may give further clues .  It may be that it is a place of meditation and not worship. I note a proposal for a tag meditation centre which has not been adopted.
tonyf1 (2020-09-22 05:06:17+00:00): I note node/907225121 is also listed as a place of worship of unspecified religion
tastrax (2020-10-03 00:58:46+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
tonyf1 (2020-10-03 01:30:08+00:00): Thanks tastrax
user_5359 (2020-10-03 02:43:02+00:00): Thanks for the hint! 
Personal note as an employee of a non-Australian telecommunications company: The spelling does not correspond to the specifying standard in the change record comment. In my view, there is no justification for separating the last eight digits into two blocks.

 Therefore I would like to ask you: Local deviations in arrangements for a key should also be mentioned on the wiki page of the key.
tastrax (2020-10-03 03:12:38+00:00): Local phone number deviations should probably be mentioned on this page rather than the Australian wiki where common agreement has suggested the patterns for the numbering - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:phone
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:31:29+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91257278
mueschel (2020-09-25 09:19:07+00:00): Hi,
could you explain what these tags mean?
service:bicycle:Kaabo
service:bicycle:Kaabo_Mantis
service:bicycle:electric_scooters

They are not used by anybody else at the moment.
TalRasha (2020-09-25 11:46:51+00:00): These is a famous scooter shop frequented by many customers (me included). When I tried to map a ride to this shop inside komoot, I couldn't find it. So I figured I would put it here so others can use it too.
mueschel (2020-09-25 12:18:51+00:00): Hi,
the way you added the shop itself (with its name and shop tags) is fine, I just wondered about the three tags I mentioned above - these are not common.


Btw, in your first changeset you deleted a building. Did you do this on purpose? Was this building razed?
TalRasha (2020-09-25 12:24:21+00:00): I see. Actually I did not add these tags explicitly myself. It was entered automatically by the interface. I just left things as is. Do you want this tags removed? I have no idea what they are for tho.
TalRasha (2020-09-25 12:24:48+00:00): *by the web interface*
yadathot (2020-09-22 04:17:29+00:00): Modified the geometry of roads and Added Residential Roads as per Private Maxar imagery.
❤️‍🔥 (2020-09-23 09:28:56+00:00): Hi, the AMETI shared path has already been mapped. You've added another shared path next to the existing one. 

It's confusing in the iD editor because the shared path and the busway are rendered the same, but one has construction=cycleway and one has construction=unclassified. 

If you take a look at the map (e.g. here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-36.90811/174.85871) you can see that there are now two shared paths along the busway
ralley (2020-10-19 18:51:26+00:00): The tagging of this is also wrong, as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction it should be tagged highway=construction and construction=cycleway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91259111
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:31:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91260120
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2021-05-24 11:43:38+00:00): Hey guy! According to the multi language tagging guideline of China Mainland, you've made wrong edit with administrative-villlages' name.
Such as this, n7852000028
You can find more details in this osmwiki page.(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multilingual_names#China)
CENTRALHUB (2021-05-24 14:56:44+00:00): Hi. Thanks for your comment but would you like share more detail about why it's wrong?
user_14250389 (2021-11-07 07:37:35+00:00): 您好，您这个编辑中为很多中国村镇添加了英文名，但为什么要带上“cun”或“zhen”这样的后缀？他们是作为专名出现的，而不是作为通名，按照现有的中国命名规范，您不应添加通名。（上面快乐的老鼠宝宝之回复已给出超链接）
况且，即使您按照大陆拼音之正词法拼写，也应是Mingzi Cun或Mingzi Zhen之类，这样后续开发者可以方便的通过正则表达式来选择是否去除。
CENTRALHUB (2021-11-08 04:58:25+00:00): 1. 镇一级的英文名按照OSM习惯的确不需要加上zhen，除非只有两个字。
2. 关于地名翻译，现在最大的问题是标准的缺失。国家只有一些笼统的指导方针，没有一个详细的标准。Multilingual names中的规范既不详细也不完美，有很多特殊的情况没有覆盖。
3. 从我的个人经验角度来看，村一级行政单位后缀带上cun会更合理，因为：
1) 方便区分地名。实际上很多镇的名字就是所驻地村的名字，村的名字又来自于所驻地自然村的名字。例如：富堨镇，富堨村，富堨。这三个地名在中文都能够得到区分，但英文如果都翻译称Fu'e，就变成了三个无法区分的地名。实际上，我是认为镇一级地名也应该加上后缀zhen/xiang的。只不过这个不是习惯性做法。
2) 很多村的名字去掉通名后会变得意义不明。例如某某前村，某某后村，某某一村，某某二村，某某新村等等。
3) 从可行角度上来看，村一级所有名字都按照拼音翻译称英文，是一个可行简单的标准，对于英语使用者也没有困惑。
4. 关于正字法/分词
1) 从理论上来说，正字法是合理的而且是好的。
2) 从实践上来说，正字法很难彻底贯彻。因为地名正字法应用的前提是你能理解每一个地名的来源与含义，才能进行分词，实际上这个很难做到。有的地名可能多种分词都合理，有的地名可能根本不知道怎么分。
3) 如果考虑一个通用/易行/合理的标准，不作正字法的分词是可以接受的。暂时把村一级地名理解为汉语拼音正字法中“不需要区分专名和通名的地名，各音节连写”。
4) 以后如果要改变，因为地名本身带有中文，重新翻译一次就好了，不需要动用正则表达式。
houston_mapper1 (2020-09-23 18:03:50+00:00): what are you trying to map here?
naveenpf (2020-09-22 05:31:13+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91260848
fiscal (2021-03-02 08:34:55+00:00): Please delete neighboring wrong TIGER data like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/12459000/history
jedidy (2021-03-03 08:31:28+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your inputs, we will try to integrate these points in our editing work flow. Please let us know if there is such road in this vicinity, we will correct it. 

Regards,
Jedidy
ortho_is_hot (2020-09-22 07:16:40+00:00): Your vandalism has been reverted: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/91270309

Regards,
ortho_is_hot
AnonymousAlligator (2020-09-22 15:10:01+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I've made a couple changes to your edits. First, I deleted the description tag--it was cut off at 255 letters, and since it was copied from the website it's potentially a copyright concern.

I also merged the museum area with the point, and removed the building and layer tags.

Other than that, your edit looks good! If you have any questions or would like to chat with other mappers, we have a Slack channel at https://slack.openstreetmap.us/. Thanks for your contribution!
mbethke (2020-09-24 09:35:32+00:00): Hi Ruminda,
please don't invent your own tags, stick to tags and, where applicable, values documented on the wiki. If you're doing data entry on behalf of an LGU or something, please coordinate on whether you could use an own namespace or something. Chances are much of this data (e.g. "building:ownership", category_of_the_house or state_of_the_house) doesn't really belong in OSM anyway though.

cheers,
Matthias
naveenpf (2020-09-22 08:33:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia


Please go through the tutorial 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1YJV6I_rhY&list=PLb9506_-6FMHZ3nwn9heri3xjQKrSq1hN&index=7
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91264833
naveenpf (2020-09-22 10:12:50+00:00): Welcome to OSM Kerala.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kerala/Members

To join OSM Kerala Telegram click on. 
https://t.me/osmkerala
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91265268
user_2066394 (2020-09-22 20:58:42+00:00): Etwas in der Form verzogen die Gebäude. Mit Taste Q kannst du die Gebäude orthogonalisieren/die Ecken rechtwinkig machen.
naveenpf (2020-09-22 08:33:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM India.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India

To join OSM India Telegram click on.
https://t.me/OSMIndia


Please go through the tutorial 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E1YJV6I_rhY&list=PLb9506_-6FMHZ3nwn9heri3xjQKrSq1hN&index=7
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/91267472
Nakaner-repair (2020-11-18 08:59:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 94342670 where the changeset comment is: Revert all changesets by user joperle (likely copyright violations becauser user did not prove permission). See comments of changeset 93619337 and user blocks 4181, 4190 for details.