piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Langlaeufer (2023-04-28 08:53:31+00:00): Die Bordsteine haben übrigens eine Richtung. Rechte Seite ist die tiefe Seite - also zur Straße hin. In ID sind da die Pfeile.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124691845
daniel_solow (2022-09-09 00:33:00+00:00): Very exciting to see this go in the FoHi  and Rego Park neighborhood! Thanks for adding
shamraevahelen (2022-08-09 15:46:32+00:00): according to the Maxar Imagery and drivers feedback
user_5359 (2022-08-10 18:19:22+00:00): Welocome to OSM! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/node/9942919946 (one of forty eight objects).
What is the meaning of the tags
chiefdom = Tonkolili
community_name = makali
district = North
functionality = 1:Yes – Functional (and in use)
maintainance_of_water_point_routine_repairs = 6:School
pump = manual
section = Kunike Barina
type_of_water_point = 2:Protected dug well
water_point_name = SLMB pri water point
water_quality = 1:Crystal clear
?
carldd (2022-08-11 06:30:57+00:00): The tags are based on those used by the Ministry of Water Resources in their published data to describe wells. I am happy to remove them if you feel they are redundant or inappropriate.

chiefdom, community_name, distric and section 
describe the location

functionality, water_quality 
describe the condition in 2017

pump, type_of_water_point 
describe the type of pump and the gerneral kind of well, e.g. drilled or protected dug ...

water_point_name 
is the name of the water point if there is one

maintainance_of_water_point_routine_repairs 
describes the person who is listed by the ministry to perform routine repairs or who is responsible for the functionality.
user_5359 (2022-08-11 08:20:13+00:00): Please use the standard OSM keys (or try to modify the existing keys, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page, for example https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpump)
carldd (2022-08-11 08:29:30+00:00): Ah okay, will change them as soon as i have time
haukep (2022-08-09 18:22:20+00:00): Hello. Welcome (back?) to OSM. Thank you for your contribution.

In the future it would be great if you could limit your work per change to a small region. In this change, you have not only conducted changes in Zillertal, Austria but also in the north-west of Arnhem, Netherlands.

This means that all people who are monitoring a region somewhere between these two locations now got a notification about your change - including me who monitors Münster, Germany - so somewhere completely different.

Also, please be careful with what you actually change: You have added the following nodes that do not serve any purpose:
 * https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9942920100
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9942920095
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9942920091

Also, you have added this way which does not have any purpose:
* https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085124136

I think, a partial revert would be required here. I'd recommend to keep the change to Node 2857645605, and the additions of Nodes 9942920102, 9942920101, 9942920098, 9942920097, 9942920096, 9942920094, 9942920093, 9942920092, 9942920090, 9942920088, 9942920087, 9942920086.

With regards to 9942920089, I'm not sure how to handle it as I don't know the convention for mountaintop crosses. (Do you create a separate node for them or if they would simply be mapped as the same node as the mountaintop?)
haukep (2022-08-10 20:31:32+00:00): Partial revert done with https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124748110
InfosReseaux (2023-06-23 21:51:30+00:00): Hi

In this changeset, you're using line_attachment=branch to describe nodes on which power lines are connected.
branch isn't an attachment but a particular topological situation described with line_management
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:line_management%3Dbranch

Is it possible to change line_attachment with line_management please?
It will allow to describe the actual attachment of lines on those supports.

Best regards
mavl (2022-08-09 16:32:30+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124589771, 124595577, 124596146, 124597434, 124599413, 124599526, 124602682, 124606985, 124608243, 124610379, 124623140, 124624538, 124625599, 124626997, 124627621, 124627825, 124628397, 124631264, 124633892, 124635746, 124636196, 124637951, 124640462, 124641163, 124646851, 124646852, 124649708, 124650531, 124650949, 124651576, 124664944, 124665264, 124665414, 124665871, 124666692, 124667150, 124668067, 124668292, 124668740, 124670168.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:20:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
AngocA (2022-08-10 00:36:08+00:00): Hola Telepalmeritas. Veo que borraste el área del cementerio. Quisiera saber por qué? y también veo que moviste un nodo, y le quitaste la propiedad de grave_yard. Ya no existe? Te agradezco la explicación.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124693852
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 00:08:50+00:00): revertido
APneunzehn74 (2022-08-30 20:19:17+00:00): Hallo, der offene Hinweis der hier noch liegt kann vermutlich geschlossen werden. 
Liebe Grüße APneunzehn74
micxer (2022-08-31 06:44:54+00:00): Sorry, ja. Habe das dann später selber noch reineditiert.
APneunzehn74 (2022-08-31 07:11:41+00:00): Kein Problem, hatte ich mir so gedacht.
LG
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:19:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:21:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 00:07:09+00:00): Revertí este conjunto de cambios, ya que había eliminado rutas en esta área.
user_5359 (2022-08-10 07:05:04+00:00): Hello! Please use the key disused:railway instead of disused_railway.
aldoct (2022-08-10 10:23:59+00:00): thanks
ivanbranco (2024-07-04 09:23:14+00:00): Hi scdhin,

what's the meaning of building=rulou?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14442881/history

thanks and good mapping :)
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-09 22:47:43+00:00): reverted
Leonardop448 (2022-08-09 23:04:22+00:00): No disque no existía pues lo que yo había creado, al fin cual es la pendejada suya, a l final termino dejando lo que yo había creado que inicialmente dijo que no existía, no se entiende la estupidez suya. Que lo que yo hice está mal pero lo elimino y dejo solo lo que había y vuelvo y lo pone. Sea coherente y deje tanta idiotes. Adiós
Niiepce (2022-08-12 16:11:07+00:00): Hier hast du den name Tag wieder zur Beschreibung von Objekten verwendet. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben%E2%86%99
Könntest du diesen Fehler beheben und  hier kurz antworten, damit ich weiß, dass du die Nachricht gelesen hast und die Korrektur vorgenommen hast. Danke
Ropino (2022-08-15 14:51:07+00:00): Hi,
please check/correct:
highway=г
thx in advance
user_6110846 (2022-08-16 12:28:18+00:00): corrected
Niiepce (2022-08-12 16:10:12+00:00): Hier hast du den name Tag wieder zur Beschreibung von Objekten verwendet. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht,_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben%E2%86%99
Könntest du diesen Fehler beheben und  hier kurz antworten, damit ich weiß, dass du die Nachricht gelesen hast und die Korrektur vorgenommen hast. Danke
Xevi (2022-12-19 16:14:50+00:00): Has modificat el nom de https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3441015633 , aquest nom que has posat no es correcte. Veig que aquest nom esta posat al ICGC pero no l'he sentit mai, no se si l'has tret d'alla, si es aixi recordar que les dades del ICGC no es pode importar a OSM
Niiepce (2022-08-12 16:24:55+00:00): Hallo,
Du verwendest hier den Tag highway=footway. Dieser ist dafür da ausgewiesene Gehwege zu beschreiben. Also Wege die mit diesem (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:traffic_sign%3DDE:239) Verkehrschild gekennzeichnet sind oder Bürgersteige die explizit nicht bzw. nicht anders beschildert sind. Handelt es sich hier um eine der beiden Fälle? Wenn nicht korrigiere bitte das Tagging zu highway=path. Dankeschön
GinaroZ (2022-08-09 22:48:21+00:00): Fairly sure this is being kept but changed to one way...
Niall_Kerr (2022-08-09 23:33:41+00:00): Not according to how it looks at the moment. Junction in the process of being fully paved over.
GinaroZ (2022-08-10 17:27:36+00:00): Presumably it will be a continuous pavement as the plans show it will be one way https://www.edinburgh.gov.uk/ccwel/downloads/download/8/general-arrangements
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
Soshal Distan Singh (2023-07-21 21:16:36+00:00): >Created a monument

>Заброшенные бомбоубежища - не монументы: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/138735549
Andrea Musuruane (2022-08-22 14:56:41+00:00): Ciao. Nel tag name va inserito, se esiste, il nome proprio e non il nome comune. Quindi name=Meridiana non va inserito. Che sia una meridiana lo si capisce dal tagging. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9943120126 Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124696267
syntex (2022-08-10 09:17:36+00:00): To nie są prawidłowe nazwy. Zestaw zmian został wycofany.
user_5359 (2022-08-13 06:50:14+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/992976664. what is the meaning of the tag Haharina = Street?
user_6110846 (2022-08-13 08:01:50+00:00): corrected
AnthonyG3124 (2022-08-09 22:44:54+00:00): Someone Should Review The 15 Express Lanes For incorrect info
Discostu36 (2024-01-01 21:32:22+00:00): Niemand darf die Einfahrt zur Feuerwehr benutzen? Keine Besucher? Nichtmal die Feuerwehr selbst?
eisbaerNils (2024-01-01 22:01:37+00:00): Gemäß Wiki habe ich mich für access=no entschieden. Es sagt, dass das befahren der Öffentlichkeit nicht gestattet ist. „private“ halte ich an dieser Stelle für schwächer. Ich meine, dass ich dies auch aufgrund eines Verbotsschildes gesetzt habe. Dies muss ich bei nächster Gelegenheit prüfen.
Discostu36 (2024-01-01 22:14:27+00:00): access ist aber kein Tag, der nur das Befahren regelt. So wie jetzt dürfte nicht mal der Postbote zur Tür gehen. Ich denke, eine Kombination wie z.B. motor_vehicle=no emergency=yes wäre passender (wenn das zur Beschilderung passt). Meiner Meinung nach ist access=no ein so "starkes" Verbot, dass es nur gesetzt werden sollte, wenn es wirklich niemanden gibt, der sinnvoll über diesen Weg geroutet werden kann (Baustelle, militärisches Sperrgebiet, Sperrung weil kaputt etc.)
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-21 02:18:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125164887 where the changeset comment is: revert questionable contributions of deleted user manriqcy, DWG ticket #2022082010000076
secutanudu (2022-08-09 18:50:46+00:00): Completed new loop of 10 mile creek cycling/hiking trail.
Frans S (2022-10-19 10:47:42+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
* I am sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and hardly squared. Please pay more attention by following the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Please pay attention to the next point:
* Most buildings are fair rectangular. Square them with the Q key when the object is selected.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124698870
Hb- (2022-12-31 13:40:53+00:00): Mit dieser Bearbeitung wurde der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32003387 um zwei Punkte verlängert. Dadurch wurden die Relationen für die Fernwanderwege und den Stadtwanderweg unterbrochen.

Ob GoMap für solche Probleme überhaupt geeignet ist, kann hier nicht beurteilt werden. Daher die Empfehlung für JOSM als Editor.

Die Relationen selbst werden hier wieder geschlossen.
Austrianton (2022-08-12 17:49:22+00:00): Please keep edits local, to avoid spamming the history feed over larger areas.

Thanks
bugi14 (2022-08-13 12:04:54+00:00): Apologies, this was automatically bundled together by MAPS.ME, I don't know why it happened but I'll report it to them as an issue
CoyKoi (2022-08-10 09:16:45+00:00): Hi Hontas, why have you deleted this sports field feature? I don't believe it has been demolished.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124699146
eggie (2022-08-09 20:13:25+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-08-09 20:18:46+00:00): Feedback..  Wanneer het geheel opgeleverd is kan inderdaad de construction weg. 
gr eggie
skquinn (2022-08-10 01:04:04+00:00): Thanks for clearing this up.
user_5589 (2022-08-20 22:22:13+00:00): So what is it this time then?

Can't be "tagging for the renderer" since neither tag is shown in common renderers. Can't be using the more widely used tag since the one you changed things to is vastly less widely used, and has all of the classic hallmarks of an artificially-enhanced tag given the essentially vertical jump in usage in mid-2018.

Your removal of unsigned_ref is NOT wanted. It is the more widely-used tag by several times. It is the tag supported by a major editor (Vespucci) when no editor supports the tag you are changing things to.

The changeset is at least of reasonable size this time, but that's the only remotely positive thing that can be said about it.

If you are going to insist on using that tag then add it as an additional tag. Do NOT remove the correct tagging already in place.
DaveF (2022-08-20 23:47:37+00:00): https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-August/021690.html

" add it as an additional tag."
No. Duplicating tags of the same meaning leads to errors & confusion.
yasslay (2022-08-21 17:54:53+00:00): Hello!

I have removed your changes to the disused railway under the big A228 roundabout as you appeared to have added unnecessary tagging (added a disused:railway=rail tag despite a railway=disused tag already being present) in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125193390.

Kind regards,
yasslay
Mauls (2022-08-21 17:58:04+00:00): That’s not unnecessary - that’s the correct tagging to show what kind of railway the disused railway is (=rail, =narrowgauge, etc.

Please see the wiki, and reinstate the tagging.
yasslay (2022-08-21 18:33:34+00:00): Hello!

I am slightly confused because the tags are very similar to each other, however I will reinstate the tagging and I do sincerely apologise for my brash decision making. I’ll add a note as well not to remove it.

Kind regards,
yasslay
Mauls (2022-08-21 18:46:16+00:00): I do understand how they look similar, but railway=disused on its own is ambiguous (similar for railway=abandoned) and could be referring to rail, or maybe even a station. Hence this tagging convention.
真空中的球形猫 (2022-08-12 14:19:19+00:00): 与其纠结名字，建议不如九段十段十一段都来一个关系，不加进具体国家的关系就是。
Hans Thompson (2022-08-10 00:03:32+00:00): Somehow you have made a giant house.
worlduser (2022-08-10 01:26:50+00:00): Hi Hans,

I think I removed the giant house.  Please take a look.  I am not sure now I did that.

Richard
worlduser (2022-08-10 06:02:35+00:00): Hi Hans,

I changed this back to a boundary.  I think that is right.  Please check.
Bonny25 (2022-08-10 09:17:24+00:00): Several serious accidents, including one with deadly outcome, happened on this Grade 3 climbing route which is tagged as a path in here. People used this route and died because of the incorrect tagging of this path. This path must be removed asap.
woodpeck (2022-08-10 11:08:11+00:00): Hallo, ich habe das Thema jetzt mal im OSM-Forum zur sprache gebracht und bitte alle Beteiligten, von weiteren Bearbeitungen abzusehen, bis wir dort einen Konsens gefunden haben: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=869200
OSM_RogerWilco (2022-08-10 06:46:34+00:00): Hallo niklasliebig,

ich vermute, dass Poitzen keine Straßennamen hat, sondern die Anschrift nach dem Schema "Ortsname + Hausnummer" erfolgt. Ist das richtig?

Viele Grüße
Roger Wilco
rene78 (2022-08-09 20:35:13+00:00): Scheint in Lindau zu sein, nicht in FN.
rene78 (2022-08-09 23:15:20+00:00): Hab den POI wieder gelöscht. Ich hoffe, dass ist okay.
mcliquid (2022-08-10 05:07:24+00:00): Hast du Mal auf die Website geschaut und dort auf die Adresse? Kannst du den POI dann bitte wieder herstellen? Dankeschön!
SHARCRASH (2022-08-09 19:49:54+00:00): + highways split/detailed
Dimitar155 (2022-12-02 18:52:56+00:00): Hello Stereo,

You've added a lot of crossing:marking=no on crossings which have zebra markings according to aerial imagery (they are also tagged with crossing_ref=zebra). Assuming you were tagging their colour, you should probably use crossing:markings:colour.

Best regards,
Dimitar
Stereo (2022-12-03 12:52:04+00:00): Здравейте Dimitar! Yes, that tag didn't exist yet back then. It's probably ripe for a mechanical edit in Luxembourg.
Stereo (2022-12-03 21:01:18+00:00): Actually, looking at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:crossing:markings, it looks like that tag is for the lines itself, not the background colour.
Dimitar155 (2022-12-03 21:54:53+00:00): Would crossing:markings=zebra:bicolour + crossing:markings:colour=red work?
CoyKoi (2022-08-10 09:19:58+00:00): Hi Hontas, please take more care with your edits. Here you have deleted an existing building, and replaced it with a new building, with less detail (lost building:levels and building=commercial). Unclear why this was done I guess it was a mistake while you were editing.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124700862
Msiipola (2022-08-14 07:05:41+00:00): Hi! This changeset has not an upload comments, which is not good.
And there many other changesets upload by you, which have no comments.
Please in the future always write a description on what you changed when doing uploads.
Msiipola (2022-08-14 07:10:59+00:00): Sorry about my comment. I didn´t see you actually hade written a (very) short description.
But more descriptive comments is better.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-12 19:45:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124830458 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism by Jimbo the Geographer
Shayan Doust (2022-08-11 22:14:52+00:00): Looks good! Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124701001
Dodko (2022-08-10 09:29:42+00:00): Tu ste zmazali ďalšiu cestu k vodnej elektrárni aj útesy.
cartographic01 (2022-08-10 10:28:48+00:00): V danej lokalite sa nenachádzajú útesy,  sú prítomné ojednielé skaly ktoré sú turistickými mapami preberané z OSM ako útesy a pozoruhodnosti, čo vedie k opakovaným nepovoleným vstupom turistov do areálu vodnej elektrárne
Tomas_J (2022-08-10 20:09:39+00:00): Tak to otaguj správne , ak vieš že sú tam skaly - (Tag:natural=rock?). Mazat existujúce objekty je nešťastné riešenie zvlášť ak si nový užívateľ.
aceman444 (2022-08-23 19:41:22+00:00): A zase ste znicili vodnu elektraren. Vratte naspat povodne znacky.
Dodko (2022-08-10 09:27:29+00:00): Prečo ste vymazali cestu k vodnej elektrárni?
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-12 19:45:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124830458 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism by Jimbo the Geographer
eggie (2022-08-09 20:23:54+00:00): Dag C Batenburg

Je vraagt feedback.. Wanneer de doorgangshoogte werkelijk 2 m is heb je het correct gedaan.
MVG
eggie
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-12 19:45:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124830458 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism by Jimbo the Geographer
Dodko (2022-08-10 05:54:22+00:00): Prečo ste dali na poľnú cestu značku access=private?
cartographic01 (2022-08-10 09:16:12+00:00): cesta nie je pristupna pre verejnost
Dodko (2022-08-10 09:24:10+00:00): Nachádza sa na obecnom pozemku  a nie súkromnom
cartographic01 (2022-08-10 20:18:36+00:00): Cesta je v užívaní súkromnej osoby, vstup verejnosti bez povolenia nie je možný.
Tomas_J (2022-08-10 20:36:11+00:00): Potom je access private v poriadku , ale určite by si nemal ďalšie existujúce cesty mazať. Ak je na ne zakázaný prístup , sú tu na to tagy , ktorými sa cesta označí.
cartographic01 (2022-08-10 20:43:38+00:00): Úpravy v mape sú vykonávané predovšetkým za účelom ochrany života, zdravia a majetku. Pre konkrétnejšie vysvetlenie je tu vždy možnosť kontaktovať ma súkromnou správou.
Tomas_J (2022-08-10 20:49:41+00:00): Úpravy za účelom ochrany života a majetku je môže realizovať správnymi tagmi. Ak vedome  mazes existujúce objekty v ilúzií že tým bude niekomu zachránený život, je to nevedomost alebo vandalizmus. Pre viac info je tu pred spornými úpravami  vždy možnosť kontaktovať diskusnu skupinu Openstreetmap Slovakia na Google groups.
aceman444 (2022-08-23 19:44:52+00:00): Dufam, ze oznam o zakaze vstupu je aj na mieste. Vase zmeny sluzia akurat tak k niceniu mapy a klamaniu ludi. Cesty aj tak budu viditelne na leteckych snimkach a ludia na ne pojdu. Naopak, ak cesty spravne zakreslite a vyznacite na nich sukromny pristup, brany, rampy a podobne, ludia pochopia, ze sa tam nema ist.
woodpeck_repair (2022-08-12 19:45:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124830458 where the changeset comment is: revert vandalism by Jimbo the Geographer
Nationalpark Sächsische Schweiz (2022-08-22 06:47:21+00:00): Hallo Weltenschummler,
auch wenn dieser Weg noch erkennbar ist, liegt er doch in der Kernzone des Nationalparks Sächsische Schweiz bzw. des angrenzenden Nationalparks Böhmische Schweiz. 
Er ist nicht markiert und damit ist es nicht erlaubt ihn zu begehen. 

Es ist für störungssensible Tiere überlebenswichtig, Rückzugsräume ohne die Anwesenheit von Menschen zu haben. Um solch ein störungsfreies Areal sicherzustellen, gehört u.a. dieser Weg nicht zum erlaubten Wegenetz für die Erholungsnutzung für den Menschen.

Bitte tagge Wege deswegen mit Betretungsverbot im Nationalpark mit disused/abandoned:highway= * und nicht highway=* , damit niemand zu einer Nutzung verleitet wird.

Vielen Dank für dein Verständnis!

Nationalparkverwaltung Sächsische Schweiz
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-11 11:32:09+00:00): Thanks! Next time, please use this offset for Bing in the Montreal area: 0.6,-1.54 which have been verified with official geodesic data.
Graptemys (2022-08-25 15:45:20+00:00): Hi ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy, I used the offset for the change and for all my other changes in the area. I'm the same one who added the buildings here last month, I just changed my display name recently.
ChaireMobiliteKaligrafy (2022-08-25 15:47:13+00:00): OK nice! Thanks!
eggie (2022-08-09 20:32:51+00:00): Dit kan nooit correct zijn . Zet nooit een hek op een kruising van wegen. Dat is fysiek onmogelijk en router zal het niet meer op de Lichttorenweg.
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-08-09 21:11:30+00:00): Het hek heb ik verplaatst naar het pad dat op private staat.

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-10 05:40:20+00:00): De voetgangersoversteekplaats heb ik verwijderd.
ArjanJager (2022-08-10 14:22:23+00:00): Bedankt voor de correctie.
eggie (2022-08-10 15:50:45+00:00): no problem