piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2019-05-10 15:33:09+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
TulioEnrique (2019-05-12 10:36:46+00:00): Hola July. Genial lo que estás haciendo. Te comento que si deseas mejorar aún más tu edición (del Colegio) hay una guía para ello... mira: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dschool
TulioEnrique (2019-05-12 10:39:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dschool (en Español)
mueschel (2019-05-20 13:58:24+00:00): Hi,
you added two small areas with strange tags like this one:
https://osm.org/way/689169174
Could you check and correct this?

Thanks
Jan
mueschel (2019-05-26 15:04:27+00:00): Thanks for removing the first one, what about the other?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689169173
snitch (2019-05-16 21:34:12+00:00): Could you please round values like 1.8288000000000002 ?
jcarlson (2019-05-16 22:24:00+00:00): Haha. Sorry, I thought I'd fixed that. I'll correct these and adjust the rest of the import going forward. Thanks for the heads up!
freebeer (2019-05-16 22:43:20+00:00): is such a value even realistic?  i see in the first page listing below, two such heights which if they really are 1,8m, i'd have to stoop so as not to take off what little remains of me grey hairs.  the one i viewed is a small structure, but i suspect there are rather coarse increments as the numbers don't align well with the sort of numbers i expect from the housing i know, not comparing against imagery yet.
freebeer (2019-05-16 23:31:59+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/689171410 claims 2,7m height.  the room i'm in is at most 2,3m with a 40cm thick roof at an angle.

yet the esri imagery for this shows such a value cannot be right, even if the shadows are misleading as this is where two aerial passes are stitched together.

i see a couple 2,4m houses one of which obviously does not have a flat roof, and another 2,7m house with shadow showing its roof cannot match such a max height and still have standing humans.

some numbers seem reasonable, 6m and a shadow to match, and as this looks rural, i suspect these are single-story so in some cases, 3 or 4 metres is plausible, but without a flat roof, not likely.

that is my quickie analysis of selected outlines against actual imagery, that the numbers are too often a bit unlikely, so i don't know if all of them add real value to osm as i expect to understand height.
jcarlson (2019-05-17 00:09:56+00:00): Thanks for the added scrutiny! It's a pretty big import, and I'll admit that when I evaluated the random samples from each county, I was mostly just looking at positional accuracy of the footprints. I may just strip the "height" tags out of this county altogether if discrepancy are as common as it seems.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-19 20:24:25+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2545309 ?
archie (2019-05-10 16:47:14+00:00): Hej, kolla detta: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_universal_tag.
eggie (2019-05-10 17:05:28+00:00): Oke Ashot. Mooi dat je wil leren. ieder van ons was ooit een beginner.
Eerst de Wetering.
De naam van een water hoort eigenlijk op een lijn. waterway=canal
Dus niet op het vlak. 
Je kunt dan voorzichting een waterway intekenen in de richting van de waterstroom. Daar zet je de naam op. 
Gr Eggie
Op een voetpad hoef je niet bicycle=no te taggen, maar kwaad kan het niet.
Het water aan de van Zijll laan is eigenlijk geen kanaal. het zijn meer vijvers.
water=pond
eggie (2019-05-10 17:10:49+00:00): Probeer in je commentaar aan te geven wat je doet. Dus voetpad ingetekend. 
.. en nu komt-ie... Een parallelvoetpad wordt niet ingetekend .. alleen als er een groenstrook ligt tussen het pad en de rijbaan. 
Dat is hier niet het geval.. Dus je kunt dat beter verwijderen.
Op de hoofdrijbaan kun je aangeven dat er een trottoir is aan beide zijden van de straat. dat doe je met
sidewalk=both
Gan dat nu eerst eens doen voordat je verder mapt.
MVG,
Eggie
(ben benieuwd of je het nu oppikt)
Gr eggie
Leo Slager (2019-05-10 23:45:15+00:00): Zie ook de wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Sidewalks
Hjart (2019-05-10 16:59:35+00:00): Bemærk at links til hjemmesider altid bør inkludere http(s):// delen
frosm (2019-05-15 23:29:17+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
les 2 bouts de route supprimés représentait la route pour atteindre le parking. si cette route n'existe pas, par oü passent les voitures jusqu'au parking ?
bonne continuation
viloan (2019-05-10 16:54:03+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2019-05-10 22:36:59+00:00): porque deletou o residencial versailles e o landeiro garden?
viloan (2019-05-10 17:23:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Jo Cassel (2019-05-14 10:34:48+00:00): Hallo, warum wurde hier - und an anderen (?)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity:kneipp_water_cure
ein korrekter Tag entfernt und durch "tourism=attraction" ersetzt?

Hier:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544361219/history#map=19/51.31331/9.40976
wurde außerdem eine neue "Kneippanlage" innerhalb(?) einer bestehenden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/544361218
erbaut.
Jo Cassel (2019-09-17 13:00:49+00:00): ... insofern habe ich jetzt 3 Änderungen revertiert.
abrensch (2019-05-19 11:20:27+00:00): Hallo Rüdiger,

hier an diesem Node ist Dir eine TR missglückt:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/315986323

Schaust Du nochmal?

Danke und Gruss, Arndt
PT-53 (2019-05-19 11:22:48+00:00): Hallo Rüdiger,
die Abbiegebeschränkung ist immer noch falsch.
Korrigiert Du das noch oder soll ich das machen?
Fragende Grüße
Agathe67 (2019-05-19 18:12:57+00:00): Hallo zusammen,

da ist mir wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen.
Danke für den Hinweis.

Hoffe jetzt passt die Relation/Relationen.
Weiter westlich hat auch noch eine gefehlt.

Viele Grüße
Rüdiger
viloan (2019-05-10 17:39:24+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
aceman444 (2020-07-31 23:50:21+00:00): Zdravim, chvalim kopu prace v Slnecniciach, riadne ste sa s tym vyhrali. Zial ako postupne dostavuju budovy a objavuju sa v katastri a na inych presnejsich snimkach, je vidiet, ze vsetky objekty su velmi nepresne a dost posunute voci realite. Pisete, ze pouzivate Bing (kde vsak ziadnu z budov na sever od Zltej nemozete vidiet), a GPS traces, ktore samozrejme vedla budov musia byt nepresne z principu fungovania GPS. Takze skusim to nejako poopravovat, ale bude to chvilu trvat. Potom si skuste zarovnat snimky (pouzite radsej napr. Maxar) podla tych budov, ked budete kreslit dalsie objekty. Problem sa tyka zony Viladomy, zona Mesto (okolo Zuzany Chalupovej) je dobre, tam som to priebezne sledoval. Dakujem
aceman444 (2020-08-01 00:02:31+00:00): Taktiez prosim nepripajajte travniky spolocnymi bodmi s chodnikmi, ci chodniky s parkoviskami a pod. Spojenie rozne plochy (parkoviska s travnikmi, ci travniky s budovami) je este OK.
viloan (2019-05-10 18:12:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Nzara (2019-05-15 14:20:01+00:00): This changeset states a maxspeed=250 for the Ceneri tunnel. Would you please state your source for this. According to my observations, this tunnel is not operational at all.
JJJWegdam (2019-05-15 14:39:20+00:00): Certainly.
https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceneri-Basistunnel
Tunnels under construction are allowed to have a maxspeed tag with the planned operational speed.
Nzara (2019-05-15 17:06:38+00:00): As far as I understand the given article, the tunnel is designed for 250 km/h. This is something diffent to 'planned operational speed'. I think, we should not mix this up.  

My sources predict a significant lower operational speed at least for next years. I suggest to refrain of assing maxspeed tags as long as we have no reliable sources for them. Probably this information will not be available until end of the year.
JJJWegdam (2019-05-15 19:56:49+00:00): Ok sure. Feel free to edit it as you please
viloan (2019-05-10 18:20:05+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Alex3271 (2019-06-27 10:29:39+00:00): Hi!
Current Mapillary data is from 17-Mar-2018.
Oneways were changed 04-Feb-2019.
I've just fixed it.
birdlawyer (2019-06-27 16:21:35+00:00): Hello,
Thank you for updating the oneway tag on way 689201179. I did not realize that there were recent changes to oneway streets in this area.
Stereo (2019-05-10 23:20:51+00:00): Hi! We already have the footbath tags on https://openstreetmap.org/way/433292572 but I'm not sure which of the two tagging schemes is "better".
JIDB (2019-05-11 07:19:21+00:00): I saw that. The main scheme is actually amenity=kneipp_water_cure but it is for the whole site (not only the par with water, for for exemple the benches around the water too). kneipp_water_cure=foot is a supplementary scheme for detail mapping and shows the parts with water. That is why, I added a tagging for the site.
Stereo (2019-05-11 21:14:49+00:00): Perfect then :). Happy mapping!
PT-53 (2019-12-25 08:33:43+00:00): Hallo TheNet1996, 
hier gibt es weitere OSM-Hinweise "nonop_confusion_on_ways":
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=10.81221&lat=48.15105&zoom=17&opacity=0.34&overlays=nonop_confusion_on_nodes,nonop_confusion_on_ways
Weihnachtliche Grüße
TheNet1996 (2019-12-27 12:22:13+00:00): Hallo PT-53, 
Danke für den Hinweis. 
Ist korrigiert. Bin in ca. 4 Wochen wieder vor Ort, dann werde ich den aktuellen Stand erfassen. 
Viele Grüße
Mike
PT-53 (2019-12-27 12:55:34+00:00): Super.
Grüße
Tomas Straupis (2019-05-10 20:14:41+00:00): Vaistinė žymima amenity=pharmacy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpharmacy)

Projektuojama gatvė žymima highway=proposed
Tomas Straupis (2019-05-10 20:19:52+00:00): Ir Hipodromo gatvė yra ne ten, nors ir šalia.
marczoutendijk (2019-05-10 19:15:04+00:00): I have changed this area to natural=scrub as the tags being used before cannot be used togehter! If something is fell it means vegatation above the tree-line and hence it cannot be a forest!

He cambiado esta área a natural = scrub ya que las etiquetas que se usan antes no se pueden usar juntas. Si algo se natural=fell, significa vegetación por encima de la línea de árboles y, por lo tanto, no puede ser landuse=forest.
yaugenka (2019-05-10 20:02:48+00:00): Здравствуйте!
Не меняйте пожалуйста тег steam на river у узких участках рек.

В соответствии с определением на вики
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:waterway%3Driver
"Если ширина водотока не превышает 2.5 м, используйте тег waterway=stream, даже если формально водоток называется рекой."
Warin61 (2019-05-17 03:23:50+00:00): Salut,
Quelle est la source du nom 'Wide Bay'?
La relation ne doit pas être étiquetée avec les mêmes balises que les méthodes qui la composent ... Dans ce cas, il pourrait être mieux étiqueté natural = bay en tant que nœud unique.

Hi,
What is the source for the name 'Wide Bay'? 
The relation should not be tagged with the same tags as the ways that make up the relation ... in this case it might be better tagged natural=bay as a single node.
4004 (2019-05-12 18:38:23+00:00): еще один дионис. opening_hours=closed ?
Pavelfantik (2019-05-12 20:34:20+00:00): на вывеске 8-23, но пока внутри пустотой зал. работает почта и аптека
4004 (2019-05-18 20:56:36+00:00): можно было бы убрать теги магазина, но непонятно когда они откроются...
Glassman (2019-05-11 19:22:21+00:00): Edit looks good. I'll send you some info on OSM to help you with future contributions to OSM.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70123740
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-02-04 20:05:56+00:00): please ddo not glue green areas to highways like you did here
Pavelfantik (2019-05-10 20:40:37+00:00): огогошеньки.
4004 (2019-05-12 00:00:29+00:00): ну, разделители там ж нарисованы. все равно обещали перестроить
freeExec (2019-05-11 10:51:18+00:00): Какие ещё "км" на 100500 языках, вы вообще знакомы со схемой name:lang?
Yevgeny Gromov (2019-05-11 11:00:22+00:00): А можно, пожалуйста, ссылку, что не так?
Yevgeny Gromov (2019-05-11 11:12:27+00:00): Пока ограничусь int_name для РФ.
freeExec (2019-05-11 12:15:54+00:00): Не нужно выдумывать названия, которые не используют носители языка для данного объекта. Этот тег не для транслитераци, не для перевода, а только для того как именно этот объект называют на том языке.
Очевидно, что никакие французы и прочие тут никогда не жили и не давали название остановочному пункту в глуши  России.

int_name тут тоже не причём, не такие крупные объекты чтобы иметь международные названия.
Yevgeny Gromov (2019-05-11 12:47:56+00:00): С крупными как раз проблем нет, и так понятно. А в поездках по Грузии, например, где алфавит совсем непонятный проблемы как раз с мелкими. Как правильно вносить километровый о.п. латиницей? Или его правильно вносить только в Латвии, Литве, но не в России и Беларуси?
freeExec (2019-05-11 13:03:08+00:00): Вносить так как они обозначены на местности.
Если алфавит не нравиться, то в постпроцессе можно преобразовывать названия как душе угодно, хоть в иероглифы.
woodpeck_repair (2019-12-01 09:12:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 77776202 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed, automatic addition of transliterated names to railway stations
tux67 (2019-05-13 08:46:09+00:00): Hallo pewekope,
willkommen bei Openstreetmap und danke, daß du mithelfen möchtest die Kartendaten zu verbessern.
Wenn du Wege löscht solltest du wirklich sicher sein, daß der Weg dauerhaft geschlossen ist und du keine Wander- Rad, Bus oder ähnliche Relationen, die auf diesen Weg referenzieren zerstörst und damit das entsprechende Routing. 
Prima, daß du deine Änderungssätze mit aussagekräftigen Kommentaren versiehst.
Bitte gib aber auch immer eine Quelle deines Wissens mit an.
Eine gute allgemeine Einführung zu OSM gibts z.B. hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
Solltest du Fragen haben oder Hilfe benötigen, dann kannst du dich gerne bei mir oder im Forum melden: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14
Für eine Qualitätssicherung an der sich alle Mapper in der Gegend beteiligen können - bitte antworte - wenn notwendig - immer hier im Änderungssatz mit der Kommentarfunktion.
Viel Spaß beim Mappen wünscht
tux67
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70124088
pewekope (2019-05-14 21:59:55+00:00): Hallo tux67,
vielen Dank für die Hinweise - sehr hilfreich. Habe als "Neuling" wohl die Komplexität etwas unterschätzt ;-) . Habe jetzt dank deines Hinweises auch OSMCha gefunden, was es hoffentlich auch etwas leichter macht.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70124088
pewekope (2019-05-14 23:05:21+00:00): Die zugänge zu den ehemaligen Wegen sind von den Waldarbeitern mit Stämmen und Gehölz versperrt, damit nicht weiter durchgegangen wird. Die ehemaligen Wege sind inzwischen auch kaum noch als solche zu erkennen. Ich vermute, es handelt sich um eine Naturschutzmaßnahme, diese Wege aufzugeben.
tux67 (2019-05-15 05:20:22+00:00): Gerne .. im Zweifelsfalle am Anfang etwas mehr lesen, wenn man was zum ersten mal macht oder einfach melden.
Gut im Hinterkopf zu haben sind auch die hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice
pewekope (2019-05-10 21:10:41+00:00): Feinkosthimmel ist umgezogen auf die andere Straßenseite
PT-53 (2019-12-21 10:16:56+00:00): Hallo  Mammi71,
Du hast an diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/32388418/history
das Merkmal
highway=construction
in
highway=footway
abgeändert.
Wen der Weg fertiggestellt ist sollte das Merkmal
construction=footway
noch gelöscht werden.
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
Mammi71 (2019-12-21 21:56:02+00:00): Das war ein Versehen, am benachbarten Wegstück hatte ich es bereits entfernt. Danke für den Hinweis, habs entfernt.
pewekope (2019-05-10 21:11:09+00:00): Praxis ShuiDao ergänzt
pewekope (2019-05-10 21:11:38+00:00): Öffnungszeiten korrigiert
tux67 (2019-05-13 08:50:16+00:00): Bitte beachte das richtige Format für Öffnungszeiten: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening%20hours?uselang=de
Korrekt ist: Mo-Fr 08:30-12:30; 14:00-16:30; Su,PH off
Kann man hier prima checken:
https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo-Fr%2008%3A30-12%3A30%3B14%3A00-16%3A30%3BSu%2C%20PH%20off&lat=51.1397244&lon=6.2910129&mode=0&DATE=1557737280000
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70124336
mikkolukas (2019-05-10 21:44:06+00:00): Det hjælper ikke at flytte adressen. Den vil automatisk blive flyttet tilbage til den originale position. Hvis adressen virkelig skal flyttes skal du kontakte den kommune adressen tilhører.
Klaus Bek (2019-05-11 04:58:01+00:00): Okay, tak, det er jo lidt et problem her på landet, at der rives så mange faldefærdige huse ned, så kortet ikke passer.
osmviborg (2019-05-11 05:54:43+00:00): En adresse repræsenterer ikke nødvendig vis en bygning. I første omgang vil det altid være matriklen der får en adresse.
Jarek 🚲 (2019-05-22 22:17:06+00:00): derp, deleted cycleway=lane from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/557114975/history by accident...
Carto'Cité (2019-05-17 09:10:41+00:00): Hello.
On Quai du Port, is it really a lane dedicated to bicycles, or just bicycle signs painted on the road ? If the latter the tag should be cycleway=opposite, not opposite_lane ? Can you plese confirm ?
Antoine of Carto'Cité, #CartoVeloIDF project
EUradfahrer (2019-05-17 16:39:21+00:00): From the OSM documentation I understand that "opposite" means you can go "contre-sens" but there are no markings on the road. When there are markings (as is the case here) it is opposite_lane.
Carto'Cité (2019-06-10 15:33:21+00:00): Actually opposite_lane should only be used when there is a dedicated lane, not just bicycle drawings (the documentation could actually be improved). Further details to describe how the opposite is indicated can be done using the tag cycleway:lane, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Acycleway%3Alane.
Cheers, Antoine.
EUradfahrer (2019-06-15 20:41:00+00:00): To be really precise: it is partly opposite_lane (white line on road to separate the main lane from the bike path in the opposite direction), and partly opposite (no line on road).
I updated the map accordingly.