piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Jean-Michel de Paris (2021-08-03 15:50:14+00:00): Bonjour,

D'accord, merci pour votre commentaire, j'ignorais cela, je le ferais les prochaines fois.

Concernant l'accès à la rue JB Lebas, oui, elle est accessible dans le sens Cysoing-Bouvines à partir de la rue Jacquard mais là aussi, je n'ai pas trouvé comment spécifier cela :(

N'hésitez pas à faire les modifications si vous le souhaitez.
habi (2021-07-16 12:15:51+00:00): Hey durga_bhavani
You've added "name :" in this changeset.
I corrected it to "name:th" in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108117374
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
Znaika (2025-10-13 18:00:05+00:00): Hi,
I saw a plate on the house directly on this crossing with street name "Nikole Djurkovića" .
Znaika (2025-10-13 18:05:58+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5004229
Sasa Uncanin (2025-10-13 20:14:06+00:00): Hi Znaika,
Thank you for contribution.
You can check all street names and home adresses with attached photos and documents on official municipality site: https://gisportal.budva.me/smartPortal/AdreseJavno
You're right, this street have plate on house "Nikole Djurkovića", although by municipality decision document from 1993 (Odluka o određivanju naziva ulica i trgova broj 0101-817/1-93 od 12.okt.1993, sl list 05/1993), "Antička" name is only one that is official. 
So, by the OSM rule "map what's on the ground" you are correct. Unfortunately, "Nikole Djurkovića" plate is not only one plate in Budva that represents misleading information
Znaika (2025-10-14 11:37:25+00:00): Hi Sasa. Thank you to clarify it. Best regards,  Znaika
julcnx (2021-08-11 15:23:47+00:00): Please refrain from tagging agricultural tracks into residential https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108050187
habi (2021-07-16 12:16:32+00:00): Hey durga_bhavani
You've added "name :" in this changeset.
I corrected it to "name:th" in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108117374
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
Benoit Soubeyran (2021-07-15 12:19:56+00:00): Il y a doublon, je veux supprimer cette relation
habi (2021-07-16 12:16:06+00:00): Hey durga_bhavani
You've added "name :" in this changeset.
I corrected it to "name:th" in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108117374
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
habi (2021-07-16 12:16:00+00:00): Hey durga_bhavani
You've added "name :" in this changeset.
I corrected it to "name:th" in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108117374
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
habi (2021-07-16 12:16:14+00:00): Hey durga_bhavani
You've added "name :" in this changeset.
I corrected it to "name:th" in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108117374
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
habi (2021-07-16 12:16:42+00:00): Hey durga_bhavani
You've added "name :" in this changeset.
I corrected it to "name:th" in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108117374
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
habi (2021-07-16 12:15:22+00:00): Hey durga_bhavani
You've added "name :" in this changeset.
I corrected it to "name:th" in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108117374
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
habi (2021-07-16 12:16:53+00:00): Hey durga_bhavani
You've added "name :" in this changeset.
I corrected it to "name:th" in changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108117374
Greetings from Switzerland,
habi
Baloo Uriza (2021-07-19 16:06:30+00:00): Mapping street-side sidewalks with the name of the street is generally considered wise.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108052035
pantus (2021-07-22 09:48:16+00:00): Hi Baloo Uriza,

Thanks for looking into my edit. I made the changes accordingly. Please find the updated change set: 108417528. Happy to learn from the community.

Thanks & Regards,
Pantus.
maro21 (2021-07-16 19:42:08+00:00): One city = one changeset, please.
pitscheplatsch (2021-07-16 05:59:18+00:00): Hi Abulqosim, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
eggie (2021-07-15 13:23:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. Je hebt de adresgegevens (BAG import)  verwijderd. In je commentaar zie ik niet waarom?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-07-15 13:28:21+00:00): Het adres heb ik weer hersteld. Mocht dit adres niet bestaan dan kun je een terugmelding doen naar het Kadaster.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Eliza%20van%20Calcarstraat%09%202&resultOffset=0&objectId=0363100012156578&geometry.x=115524.68740075&geometry.y=485344.00050672&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0363010001955304

MVG
eggie
Futur3r (2021-07-15 12:59:58+00:00): Salut,

si le parking n'as pas de nom laisse le comme ça

merci pour tes contributions
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108052660
user_5359 (2021-07-16 07:59:56+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964600440 (and also https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/96457737 from another change set): The admin_level=1 must be wrong, because the 2 is reserverd for a country, so 1 must be a contient (or higher). Please correct this dircetly!
Kautilya3 (2021-07-18 02:43:14+00:00): I have now reverted this edit because it was attemting to change the boundary of India.
Vinber (2021-07-19 17:39:56+00:00): Bonjour,
vous utilisez name pour désigner des lieux pour les parking à vélo, je ne pense pas que cela soit le bon usage (ce n'est pas vraiment le nom du parking à vélo :) )

Pourquoi voulez vous ajouté le nom ? on le voit où se trouve le parking à vélo ?

à plus
mavl (2021-07-22 07:24:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108404392 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping - https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/107679175].
user_3961358 (2021-07-15 12:58:46+00:00): Seems I oversaw them on terrain, was very surprised not to find them at the time.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-07-16 07:19:58+00:00): Ciao. Questa modifica è errata. E34 non è il nome ma l'identificativo del sentiero. L'identificativo si inserisce nel tag ref: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref

Per quanto riguarda i sentieri il ref non si mette sulla way ma sulla relazione che rappresenta l'itinerario escursionistico: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CAI#Percorsi_escursionistici

In questo caso il ref risulta già presente: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/820490193#map=16/45.6488/7.9557 

Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108054381
Andrea Musuruane (2021-07-16 07:26:59+00:00): Link alla relazione: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11250160#map=15/45.6541/7.9550
BCNorwich (2021-07-16 09:16:33+00:00): Hi, requested review.
The grass outline was self-intersecting as was the fence line. The residential area was dragged out of alignment and was thus self-intersecting. Same with the school outline.

The footpath had about multiple nodes on the same spot in two places, it was placed on top of the fence and other boundary lines. 

It would have been very difficult to explain how to rectify these problems so I've made corrections. I also remove the formal name 'Public footpath@from a single node.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
no details provided here (2021-07-16 09:26:55+00:00): Thank you very much indeed Bernard.  You may have guessed I am new to this although the path itself is very old indeed. J
Strubbl (2021-07-16 22:22:53+00:00): Hi Lopus, warum hast du beim Node 7473081826 das bin=yes weggemacht und bei amenity ;waste_basket angefügt? Das Wiki erwähnt doch auch den Tag bin: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:vending=excrement bags
Lopus (2021-07-17 06:56:51+00:00): Hi Strubbl,
Da hast du natürlich recht, habe bin=yes wieder hinzugefügt.
Danke für den Hinweis
BCNorwich (2021-07-16 09:22:05+00:00): Hi the school name in on the premises boundary outline as per OSM practice. I've removed the name from the building and amended the name on the outline.

Regards Bernard.
no details provided here (2021-07-16 09:27:54+00:00): Many thanks Bernard.  Keen to see the school and nursery title correct but am new to this.
Andrea Musuruane (2021-07-16 07:20:47+00:00): Ciao. Questa modifica è errata. D14 non è il nome ma l'identificativo del sentiero. L'identificativo si inserisce nel tag ref: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ref

Per quanto riguarda i sentieri il ref non si mette sulla way ma sulla relazione che rappresenta l'itinerario escursionistico: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CAI#Percorsi_escursionistici

In questo caso il ref risulta già presente: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9733602#map=15/45.6384/7.9673

Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108054603
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-07-22 16:47:20+00:00): نرجوا عدم إضافة حدود غير صحيحة
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-07-22 16:47:54+00:00): نرجوا عدم إضافة مسميات غير صحيحة
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-07-22 16:48:15+00:00): نرجوا عدم إضافة مسميات ومواقع غير صحيحة
clever (2021-07-19 18:12:53+00:00): these edits appear to break the addr:street=* tags on nearby objects, and dont fully rename the streets
flohoff (2021-07-15 13:59:40+00:00): Moin,
weil ich den changeset gerade gesehen habe. Es ist besser die Gebäude mit "razed:building=yes" umzutragen. Ansonsten kommen andere mapper auf die Idee die Gebäude wieder einzutragen.

Deshalb mal nach den Lifecycle tags im Wiki gucken.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108055813
zluuzki (2021-07-19 18:38:34+00:00): Nur eine kleine Amnerkung: Ich verwende "demolished:building=*" statt "razed:building=*", da das im ID-Editor besser dargestellt wird. Beispielbild bei https://imgur.com/a/J01irkk Verwirrt noch weniger.

Kann man aber natürlich trotzdem mit razed machen, ich wollte es nur erwähnt haben.
flohoff (2021-07-15 15:15:43+00:00): Moin,
nur so kleinigkeiten. Auf einem highway=footway brauchst du kein "foot=yes"

Zu dem horse/bicycle=no - Stehen da wirklich schilder das das nicht zulässig ist? Ansonsten würde ich das nicht taggen. 

Mit dem "unpaved" - Guck mal nach dem "informal=yes" im Wiki - Sieht ja so aus wie "kein offizieller weg aber benutzbar" ... 

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108056077
SafetyIng (2021-07-15 20:52:19+00:00): This road can not be a track (the main road too).
Please see at wiki enty of hw=track: " Roads used for access to permanent human settlements or facilities should generally not use this tag. "
viplavm (2021-07-16 14:54:55+00:00): Hi SafetyIng, 
I have digitized the track road as per the aerial imagery and the vicinity seems to be a forest with a network of track roads. Please let me know your inputs on this so that I can make any changes. Regards,
viplavm
SafetyIng (2021-07-16 16:18:54+00:00): See at the Wiki for track.....
"Roads used for access to permanent human settlements or facilities should generally not use this tag."

For more information and tagging suggestions, where track not fits: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
drkt (2021-07-18 14:13:21+00:00): I must have been sleeping. 
The actual source is the usual SDFE aerial
Tantri IRM-ED (2023-01-13 04:24:11+00:00): Hello gunnar1m
thank you for contributing to adding data in OSM!
I'm currently doing remote mapping to validate the existing rail network in Myanmar.
i need your help especially for railway (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/964618110)
i see in the history of osm that you added the railway crossing with the highway but the railway is not visible in any imagery (21.88437755,95.99408135). Do you know if the railway tracks stop before crossing the highway or is there a crossing with the highway? is there any other information that you can explain?

I really appreciate any information you provide.
thank you
DeFra85 (2023-09-06 18:47:35+00:00): www.openstreetmap.org/note/3872996
Piskvor (2021-07-16 15:58:07+00:00): Z nějakého důvodu jsem nezavřel předchozí CS; tím pádem jsou tady ještě edity detailů v Libni
felipeeugenio (2021-07-16 23:07:03+00:00): Hola. Mismo comentario aca por los =grass
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108058509
user_2066394 (2021-07-15 22:11:40+00:00): Was ist mit der Zufahrt passiert?
https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/937114533
Gertinger (2021-07-16 04:41:46+00:00): Das ist keine Zufahrt zu dem Grundstück.
user_2066394 (2021-07-16 09:42:23+00:00): Wie verläuft die Zufahrt tatsächlich?
Gertinger (2021-07-16 16:00:36+00:00): Die einzige Zufahrt in den Hof ist auf der Karte vorhanden. Es gibt keine zweite Zufahrt. Deshalb habe ich diese entfernt.
hatul (2022-06-06 08:15:51+00:00): זו שמורה מוכרזת בצו, למה מחקת אותה?
zstadler (2022-06-06 09:57:40+00:00): להבנתי, צו אלוף זו לא הכרזה
user_5359 (2021-07-16 08:31:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Note that in OSM classification of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only name and description, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
MxxCon (2021-07-16 01:59:40+00:00): Hello.
It appears that you added this business in two places. Was this intended? If not, please update your edit to the correct location of this business.👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108062761
aceman444 (2023-09-13 21:12:03+00:00): Hi, please don't add fictional descriptive names like "street workout". That is a type of object, not its name.

Also write proper changeset descriptions instead of hashtags that nobody can understand.

If you need to put invalid tags like sport=exercise (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:sport), at least write it without typos.
muchichka_s (2022-01-07 20:32:49+00:00): Привіт. А чому кИданч, а не кІданч, як в постанові?
user_6110846 (2022-01-15 15:36:20+00:00): я брав з сайту новин 
там мабуть помилилися
PierZen (2021-12-28 03:03:17+00:00): @hotosm-project-11109
deleted micro artefacts, not buildings
user_11418917 (2021-07-16 13:15:47+00:00): Stop adding spam!
Omnific (2021-07-15 20:09:24+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Your edit looks good, thank you. Please reach out if you have any questions.
Dodko (2021-07-16 18:50:36+00:00): Kadiaľ teraz vedie prerušená žltá cyklotrasa?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5975833#map=15/48.9277/18.0811
Baloo Uriza (2021-07-19 15:38:59+00:00): Should be "Cache Road Northwest".  Please don't abbreviate in name=*.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108066048
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-11 14:24:56+00:00): esto no es un castillo, por favor deja de agregar cosas como esta.
--
its not a castle. please stop adding points like this.
Janjko (2021-07-16 09:22:03+00:00): Ove promjene su maknute, autoput do Siska nije dovršen. Pretpostavljam da niste razumjeli da ove promjene odlaze na stvarnu kartu? Ili ste stvarno mislili da je autoput dovršen? Uglavnom, ako ćete htjeti napraviti ove promjene, morat ćete napraviti vlastitu bazu.
edvac (2021-08-02 16:20:45+00:00): Thank you, @Janjko. We have received a ticket at the DWG about this user edits. Please, let us know if similar issues persist.

Hvala ti, Janjko. Na DWG -u smo dobili kartu o uređivanju ovog korisnika. Molimo da nas obavijestite ako slični problemi potraju. (automatic translation)

Rafael Avila Coya
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
Andrea Musuruane (2021-07-16 07:50:19+00:00): Ciao e benvenuto su OSM. Per favore, non usare le immagini aeree di Bing perché non sono ben allineate nelle nostre zone. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Per cambiare sfondo con iD, prova a guardare questo screenshot: https://imgur.com/1wjkVbr Oppure, se vuoi usare le Bing, le devi riallinearle manualmente usando la funzione "Offset delle immagini" in iD: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_Imagery#iD Inoltre, il tag tourism=picnic_site serve per indicare un'area picnic: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dpicnic_site Quindi deve essere inserito solo una volta per area. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108066890
Livingstong (2021-07-16 12:48:51+00:00): Ciao Andrea,
Ti ringrazio per i tuoi preziosi suggerimenti e correzioni.
PierZen (2021-12-28 02:08:53+00:00): Thanks to collaborate. I spotted and  deleted micro artefacts that do  not correspond to buildings - will do the same with other changesets 
note @hotosm-project-11109 #MissingValidation and new mappers support.
Glassman (2021-07-15 23:58:35+00:00): Thanks for adding all the addresses and building names! They look great!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108067013
eggie (2021-07-15 18:13:54+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback 
De adresnodes geven aan Doctor Smitstraat..
In de BAG staat het nu als Dr. Smitstraat.
Denk dus dat je de adresnodes nu kunt aanpassen. 
Kennelijk is er na de import iets veranderd.


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-07-15 18:15:30+00:00): Zie ook https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Doctor%20Smitstraat%202&resultOffset=0&objectId=0197200000498421&geometry.x=230663.758&geometry.y=431202.889&zoomlevel=6&detailsObjectId=0197010000037472
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-15 18:20:09+00:00): Maar die apotheek heeft toch niet het voorgaande adres meegenomen.
Raadhuisstraat 8 zit hier.
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=raadhuisstraat%208%20d&resultOffset=0&objectId=0197200000502232&geometry.x=230769.46199743&geometry.y=430835.07699978&zoomlevel=7&detailsObjectId=0197010000502233

Wellicht nog even kijken?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-15 18:22:03+00:00): Je edits.
Alle adresnodes zijn import vanuit het Kadaster. Beter niet aan veranderen en op de juiste adresnode bijtaggen.
Waar is nu Aaltenseweg 1?
eggie (2021-07-15 19:36:13+00:00): Het adres heb ik hersteld en de apotheek op de juiste adresnode geplaatst aan de Raadhuisstraat.
MVG
eggie
Anim Mouse (2021-07-23 14:21:16+00:00): Maybe if we upgrade it to secondary road for the meantime and downgrade it to tertiary after the construction of Mindanao Ave Extension is complete. What do you think?
TagaSanPedroAko (2021-07-23 19:14:49+00:00): Unless the Mindanao Avenue extension is not built, having the pre-existing main roads downgraded as a better route is being built is fine. Temporarily upgrading local roads to a higher classification in a map to mark a detour around a closed section is generally not good practice.
Anim Mouse (2021-07-30 03:52:48+00:00): I'm not upgrading this road to mark a detour around Mindanao Avenue per se. According to the Mapping conventions of Philippine Roads in OSM Wiki, "If a tertiary route is physically larger or carries more traffic than other tertiaries, or serves three or more barangays or districts with minimal alignment jogs, a tertiary can be promoted to a secondary, taking most factors in account, most importantly, connectivity."
I believe this tertiary route carries more traffic than other tertiaries, as I travel this road frequently, to the point of having so much traffic that this is not a tertiary road for me.
TagaSanPedroAko (2021-07-30 06:49:19+00:00): But that would be the case if P. dela Cruz feeds traffic to other tertiary routes. For this one, there’s none, and the changes are completely fine. Yes, it may have more traffic (considering the Mindanao Avenue gap), but its function is ultimately an industrial collector, not an arterial street, and again, there are no other tertiary roads feeding to it to justify an upgrade.
Anim Mouse (2022-01-21 03:31:30+00:00): Ok, accepted to remain this road as tertiary. (P.S. the traffic in this road is getting so worse, as so many people are using this road nowadays, it's better to remain this as tertiary to lessen the traffic.)
Anim Mouse (2025-02-22 11:53:21+00:00): With the recent opening of the Mindanao Avenue Extension, this discussion is now considered moot and academic. Thank you for the debate.
PierZen (2021-12-28 03:12:10+00:00): @hotosm-project-11109
deleted micro artefacts, not buildings
PierZen (2021-12-28 03:16:24+00:00): @hotosm-project-11109
deleted micro artefacts, not buildings
anderfo (2021-11-01 12:18:14+00:00): Syns det skjer litt for ofte at stiene jeg tegner inn i området mellom Geitfjellet og Ila forsvinner. De eksisterer jo, og jeg har vært der og sett dem. I vår hørte jeg også at en av tur-o-postene langs denne stien var blitt fjernet gjentatte ganger. Det minner om "trolling". Er stiene virkelig så hemmelige at man må hindre folk i å ferdes der?
<fredrik> (2021-11-11 22:50:53+00:00): Vad handlar detta om? Jag ritade in stien för ett tag sen och den blev fjärnad. 

Är ju ingen som äger den stien eller den delen av marka.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-03-08 10:39:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964690841/history - what you wanted to express by adding name=239 ?
AndresDuhour (2021-08-04 18:26:22+00:00): Hola!
puede ser que este segmento se haya copiado por error? Andrés
DressyPear4 (2021-07-16 09:46:16+00:00): Olá, coloque apenas hgv=no, quando você coloca motor_vehicle também restringe acesso de motos e carros.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108070005
eggie (2021-07-16 08:56:49+00:00): Dag Tim,,

Je vraagt feedback..
Het stuk achter het hek kun je beter als highway=service taggen. 
Je gebruikt BING als achtergrond.
Die laag is verouderd en ligt er op veel plaatsen naast. 
Doet de PDOK actueel het niet?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-07-16 08:59:08+00:00): Lees even hier https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=835226#p835226
Tim Van (2021-07-17 21:37:33+00:00): ok, bedankt!
Patchanka (2021-07-15 19:38:15+00:00): Bug JOSM sur description du changeset : Petites corrections, suppression de divers tags inapropriés
eggie (2021-07-16 08:53:19+00:00): Dag Skyppy
Je vraagt feedback
Zo te zien liggen alle routedelen van de wandelroutes op volgorde.

MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2021-08-31 15:14:08+00:00): Hi Sie,

what's the meaning of SIMC=0202028?
Patryk Piotrowski (2021-08-31 16:02:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/108070944
Proszę o precyzyjne pytanie.
maraf24 (2021-08-31 16:19:37+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_identyfikator%C3%B3w_i_nazw_miejscowo%C5%9Bci
maraf24 (2021-08-31 16:23:51+00:00): I found it: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/282064077
There are 8 more.
felipeeugenio (2021-07-16 00:20:17+00:00): Hola Jorge
por favor no abreviar palabras. 
En un formato digital eso no tiene mucho sentido.
saludos
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108071172
Jorge Yañez (2021-07-20 14:05:09+00:00): Hola Felipe, ok entendido quedaría ejemplo. Sociedad Perez Burucker LTDA.
felipeeugenio (2021-07-20 14:46:08+00:00): exact. gracias. Revisando tus otras ediciones, hay muchas abreviaciones. saludos
olo81 (2021-08-02 19:47:49+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964696690#map=19/52.19955/20.41585

to private chyba nie bardzo pasuje, nie sprawdzałem ale działki pewnie sięgają do ogrodzenia i dopiero za ogrodzeniem jest private
Florek89 (2021-08-03 13:21:27+00:00): Na discordzie OSM zostało to już poruszone i będę wymieniał w najbliższych dniach (usunę access=private)
olo81 (2021-08-03 19:48:57+00:00): Pociągłem okolice overpassem, nie ciągłeś dróg na posesjach to łatwo było to poprawić hurtowo