piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-11-12 06:18:09+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1022686643/history has id = -329287 that was added in this edit
What is the meaning of this unusual key? Is this tag needed?
Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
Or maybe this key can and should be documented as useful tagging schema?
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
andi9876 (2016-12-02 03:55:08+00:00): there is no attraction, deleted
az09 (2016-11-30 20:28:25+00:00): К вам выехали по адресу улица Скульптора Головницкого, 10А. Готовьте грибы!
SomeoneElse (2017-01-12 23:58:23+00:00): Hello alexx_all,
Your source tag here says "поправки с карты google". We are not allowed to copy from Google Maps (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to stop doing this immediately.
We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will go through your changes and will need to remove data that's been added from Google. This may take some time, but please do be aware that features that you have added from Google will disappear.
If you have any questions you can reply here, or you can email the Data Working Group on data@osmfoundation.org .
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend
SomeoneElse (2017-01-12 23:59:27+00:00): (Автоматический перевод)
Привет alexx_all,
Ваш источник тегов здесь говорит "поправки с карты Google". Нам не разрешено копировать с Google Maps (см https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F для деталей), так что вы должны прекратить делать это немедленно.
Мы (Рабочая группа данных OpenStreetMap в) будет проходить через ваши изменения и нужно будет удалить данные, которые были добавлены с помощью Google. Это может занять некоторое время, но, пожалуйста, помните, что функции, которые вы добавили от Google исчезнет.
Если у вас есть какие-либо вопросы, вы можете ответить, или вы можете по электронной почте Рабочую группу данных по data@osmfoundation.org~~pobj.
С наилучшими пожеланиями,
Энди Таунсенд
mavl (2017-01-13 06:16:49+00:00): Dear SomeoneElse. Data Working Group has email with an explanation. I will inform a detail soon.
user_5359 (2016-11-28 20:50:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 01:40:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
user_5359 (2016-11-28 20:57:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Has your business really only open monday?
user_5359 (2016-11-28 20:58:29+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-28 20:58:52+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-13 17:56:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44334107 where the changeset comment is: Revert un-discussed and erroneous building footprint imports, see http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43899797 http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/43886022 http://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1096 et al
user_5359 (2016-11-29 21:01:44+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
luiswoo (2016-11-25 20:33:08+00:00): Может это была пешеходная дорожка, зачем было удалять, можно было переделать.
Avrocalan (2016-11-28 05:50:16+00:00): Переделал на пешеходную дорожку, действительно поторопился
stephankn (2017-01-01 17:42:49+00:00): Please do not add duplicates. Manee House is already listed here.
user_5359 (2016-11-29 21:02:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-29 21:03:10+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-29 21:04:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! For better description of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
user_5359 (2016-11-29 21:05:03+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2017-01-11 19:32:58+00:00): I'm deleting this node that was created using presumed unacceptable data sources.
aharvey (2017-03-23 10:59:51+00:00): For https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455660812 is it really named "Unmarked track"? There is a tag for unmarked tracks, trail_visibility=no.
trigpoint (2016-11-25 14:08:59+00:00): Hi, changing Tesco Express from amenity=fuel to a shelter looks very odd to me. Is there a good reason for that?
Cheers Phil
BCNorwich (2016-11-25 14:32:09+00:00): Sorry, I wanted to add the feature/area as a shelter but failed to realise I was removing the fuel tag from amenity. 
Looking at it again shelter doesn't seem right anyway. Now found building=canopy, perfect.
Regards
Владимир К (2017-04-14 06:35:05+00:00): река действительно называется "Родник"?
DimaMashnikov (2017-04-15 16:34:28+00:00): вы верно заметили ошибку, у Верды приток Теменка, а Родник действительно есть.
literan (2016-11-25 11:38:15+00:00): Здравствуйте! пожалуйста, не добавляйте теги вроде foot=yes, bicycle=yes на дорожки. Почему - описано в моем профиле. В данном случае вы прямо добавили ложный тег (по ПДД на велосипеде перемещаться по пешеходным переходам по умолчанию запрещено)
luiswoo (2016-11-25 17:50:33+00:00): а. Он действительно строиться?
б. Есть ли его схема, лучше этой https://img-fotki.yandex.ru/get/15528/1402.4/0_199266_47e6a9dc_orig.jpg
что бы можно было привязать к местности?
jc86035 (2016-11-25 10:34:24+00:00): Line colours are added to the route relations, not the tracks. (The MTRC doesn't paint the physical tracks bright red.)
trigpoint (2016-11-26 16:09:28+00:00): Hi, this should probably be tagged as a gallery rather than an artwork.
Cheers Phil
BCNorwich (2016-11-26 16:32:09+00:00): Agree, changed.
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:36:51+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
alphensebezorger (2017-06-13 19:30:47+00:00): Hoi Jaap,
Is hier niet iets misgegaan? Nu staat er een groot gebouw (De Beijer) op de kaart, met daarbinnen vier kleinere. Moest dit gebied niet de tag landuse=industrial krijgen i.p.v. building=industrial? Of moeten de oude gebouwen nog gewist worden?
Groetjes, Alphensebezorger.
jaap de vries (2017-06-21 20:41:39+00:00): Hier zit de nieuwe vestiging van de Beijer, zat eerst in Kekerdom. 
https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/#?geometry.x=174263.33125&geometry.y=434581.739375&zoomlevel=5&objectId=1740100000019142&detailsObjectId=1740010000020312
alphensebezorger (2017-06-22 20:59:16+00:00): De informatie in de BAG klopt dus, is actueel? Zal ik dan een BAG-import via het forum aanvragen? Of hoor jij bij het selecte groepje BAG-importeurs en doe je het zelf?
jaap de vries (2017-06-23 05:48:39+00:00): Het pand is nog niet ingemeten en klopt dus niet wat op de BAG staat. Ik kom hier regelmatig en heb ook al de gemeente geïnformeerd mbt de BAG. Gemeente Neder-Betuwe is sinds de samenvoeging traag.
Norer (2017-01-06 12:20:50+00:00): Il y a deux micro-corrections de tracé:

entre Dardagny et Malval, le bus P effectue un crochet sur l'arrêt Essertines, via la route d'Essertines et le chemin des Ripettes. Sur OpenStreetMap, cet arrêt est correctement géolocalisé dans le hameau.
entre Malval-Hameau et Les Baillets, le bus P dessert le centre nature de l'Allondon, via les arrêts Malval-Chapelle et Malval-Centre nature.
voici les coordonnées pour ces deux arrêts: - https://api3.geo.admin.ch/rest/services/ech/MapServer/ch.bav.haltestellen-oev/8595950/extendedHtmlPopup?lang=fr - https://api3.geo.admin.ch/rest/services/ech/MapServer/ch.bav.haltestellen-oev/8595951/extendedHtmlPopup?lang=fr

A noter enfin que les arrêts de Malval et Noirettes sont renommés en Malval-Hameau et Russin-Noirettes.
stedewa (2017-01-06 16:04:37+00:00): Merci corrections effectuées.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44956606
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:40:13+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
glglgl (2016-11-25 10:37:32+00:00): In diesem Änderungssatz ist offenbar mit dem "residential"-Gebiet (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455516998) etwas schiefgelaufen. Das habe ich mal entknotet, jetzt sollte es wieder stimmen.
Hjart (2016-11-25 09:21:58+00:00): Du har slettet en polygon, der angav nogle omgivende arealer som eng (hvilket de også på luftfotos ligner). Mon ikke dette er en fejl?
Hjart (2016-11-25 09:34:10+00:00): Dette ligner en mindre stavefejl.
letihu (2017-04-16 12:35:43+00:00): Hier 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/455679984/history
hab ich mal einen Tunnel von gemacht und den doppelten Wasserweg entfernt.
Hjart (2016-11-25 10:36:35+00:00): Jeg har ændret arealet til en såkaldt multipolygon bestående af 3 separate områder. Bemærk venligst at det i OSM er bedst at holde diverse arealer adskilt fra vejnettet (jeg har måttet separere dem her).
Søren Ring (2016-11-25 11:18:41+00:00): Ok - bare det fremgår tydeligt at de tre områder er Fugleværnsfondens reservat alle tre
Hjart (2016-11-25 11:30:18+00:00): Det gør det: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6739185
Hjart (2016-11-25 11:32:30+00:00): Jeg har iøvrigt gennemgået alt hvad du har lavet og har på fornemmelsen at du laver dette som en del af et lønnet arbejde?
Hjart (2016-11-25 11:14:19+00:00): Der var i forvejen en her: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1845429356. Er de begge korrekte?
Hjart (2016-11-25 09:52:41+00:00): Blå kors, Kirkens Korshær og lignende tagges bedst i stil med https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/231640504
eggie (2017-04-18 10:12:15+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
Supaplex (2016-11-27 18:54:24+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
jaap de vries (2017-04-06 08:05:08+00:00): Je hebt hier een outdoorwinkel "de fietser" toegevoegd, is het niet beter dat dit een fietsenwinkel tag krijgt?
s1256289 (2017-06-27 09:54:18+00:00): Ja, prima. Ik ben nog niet helemaal thuis in alle labels.
RW_SustransScotland (2016-11-25 11:06:05+00:00): Hi Agnes. It looks like you made a mistake in this edit... the road moved in a way that doesn't make sense. I can see that you're a new mapper so don't worry - it was easily fixed. If you need any help please ask.
eggie (2018-05-30 08:02:39+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:43:03+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
*Martin* (2021-07-30 20:42:10+00:00): Tag "website" by mal obsahovat aj schemu (http alebo https).
Dodko (2021-07-31 08:46:49+00:00): Aktualizované, tá web stránka už ani neexistovala.
*Martin* (2021-07-31 17:39:25+00:00): ano, neskor som si vsimol :). mozno aj je nejaky osm validator ktory kontroluje website/url a pod...
demon_box (2016-11-26 19:52:05+00:00): ciao, hai inserito un nodo con soltanto "name=chisetta di san Onofrio di Sabbio" ma la chiesetta esiste già come edificio completo quindi l'ho eliminato.
trigpoint (2016-11-25 13:55:15+00:00): Is your office really in the middle of a car park?
mapping man (2016-11-26 11:10:47+00:00): They have also deleted the road in the carpark. http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=43942322

This users edits need to be reverted.
trigpoint (2016-11-26 11:23:52+00:00): I have reverted this
mapping man (2016-11-26 11:25:26+00:00): @trigpoint thanks. I suspect that its a spam account.  Out of interest how do you revert a changeset?
SomeoneElse (2016-11-26 12:38:03+00:00): The address given in their edit checks out with their website - might be worth someone phoning the number on the website to ask if they added it themselves (and then explaining how to do it not in a car park) or if they paid someone else to do it, and if so who.
There have been a large number of "spammy" edits to OSM recently - a number of companies are offering "we can add you to OSM" services.  Sometimes the entries are for companies with no physical presence, and so don't belong in OSM, but sometimes they're for real bricks-and-mortar businesses who don't realise that they're paying money to no good effect, as may have happened here.
dgitto (2016-11-27 06:41:36+00:00): Pay attention with osmand. The supermarket was there before. Anyway thanks for the opening hours
arcanma (2017-01-21 18:03:57+00:00): Per la Ciclovia Assisi-Spoleto esiste la relazione #455698861, che include via San Donato e oltretutto vedo che hai modificato. Non va creata una way aggiuntiva sovrapposta, se la ciclovia ha un percorso separato la way va inserita a lato, altrimenti si inserisce nella relazione la way esistente (come è già stato fatto)
glglgl (2016-11-25 12:38:14+00:00): Saarlouis n'est pas en Lorraine…
glglgl (2016-11-25 12:38:07+00:00): Saarlouis n'est pas en Lorraine…
trigpoint (2016-11-26 16:05:34+00:00): Hi, this would be better tagged as shop=farm, but maps.me probably doesn't offer that :)

Cheers Phil
mapping man (2016-11-26 16:41:22+00:00): No maps.me doesnt give that option.  I always try to find the closest equilavent with an aim to correcting later when im back on a desktop. 

Thanks
Myazyk (2016-12-22 20:29:01+00:00): Чому видалив назву каплиці?
Shoorick (2017-09-15 11:05:26+00:00): Class of road defined by its role — not by its surface or width. Named road in city should be residential or higher, not track.
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:52:09+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
arcanma (2017-01-14 16:53:16+00:00): ll percorso 455702565 (forest) ha un tratto che interseca se stesso, sarebbe da correggere. Grazie.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2017-02-14 19:32:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 46087845 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some Google-sourced edits
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:52:34+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
user_5359 (2016-11-30 19:53:12+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse (2017-06-16 21:19:30+00:00): Oops - something gone wrong with the merging that created https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35542400/history .  It now has "lcn_ref=1;2;2" and "lcn=proposed;yes;yes".
Are you OK to split it again and reapply the old tags or would you like me to do it?
Best Regards,
Andy
arcanma (2017-01-14 16:56:08+00:00): ll percorso 455714540 (forest) ha un tratto che interseca se stesso, sarebbe da correggere. Grazie.
arcanma (2017-01-14 16:57:22+00:00): Anche il percorso 455714538, stesso problema
trigpoint (2016-11-26 15:59:45+00:00): Please do not change the names of football stadiums to include the club name, that is not the name of the ground.
I am reverting this vandalism.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-04-16 04:26:46+00:00): [Alabang+Santa Rosa, Laguna] rename SSS office and jeepney stop, add Shakey's branch in Solenad 1
muralito (2016-11-26 00:45:17+00:00): Marcelo:

Fijate que si unis pedazos de lineas que se usan para limites (y todos los pedazos no son del limte) el limite queda mal.

http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2858482 (Con los tramos añadidos al arroyo Cañada Grande queda como con dos bigotes par afuera)
Mgodiard (2016-11-26 23:19:57+00:00): Tienes Toda la razón, menos mal que te tengo atento!!!
A ver si así quedó bien?
waldhans (2016-11-26 10:24:02+00:00): Bin gerade zweimal an der Ecke vorbeigefahrenen, da gibt es außer Gebüsch gar nichts. Der ATM steht in der Commerzbank und ist richtig eingetragen.

Was wolltest du da eintragen?

Ich werden den Knoten heute löschen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Kurt
BeKri (2016-11-26 12:15:45+00:00): typischer Mapsme(lecksts).me Beitrag
Tomas Straupis (2016-11-25 19:11:12+00:00): Neteisingas adreso keitimas. Pakeitimas atšauktas.
74523978 (2016-11-25 21:50:18+00:00): This is falsely tagged, please don't tag it as a supermarket when it's not. Just below your node there's already a tag for the marketplace.
74523978 (2016-11-28 08:14:22+00:00): P.S. I've added name:de=wochenmarkt to the existing node so it is now possible to search "wochenmarkt enschede"
schadow1 (2017-01-25 03:25:10+00:00): Hello. Most of your edits in this changeset could not be seen from both mapbox and bing imagery. May I know your source? Thanks!
Alexander Avtanski (2016-11-28 22:03:55+00:00): Notes regarding this change:

1) Only part of the road is private, and the "(private)" label has been added only to that part of the road.
2) The private section of the road is already marked with "access=private".
Commodoortje (2017-02-23 23:35:27+00:00): Hoi Alsoft,

Het lijkt erop dat onderstaand landuse toch echt een kwekerij is (landuse=plant_nursery)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/452243808
Mag ik vragen waarom je deze hebt omgezet naar
landuse=orchard (boomgaard) ?
Alsoft (2017-02-24 05:38:29+00:00): Het is een volkstuin complex
Commodoortje (2017-02-24 08:47:52+00:00): Ik ben hier niet van overtuigd, maar mocht het een volkstuinencomplex zijn dien je je iets beter te verdiepen in de regels van het mappen.
Ik merk op dat je veel edits half afwerkt, dit geeft problemen. Als je er niet op gewezen wordt zal er geen verbetering komen vrees ik. Daarom laat ik je weten dat er een wiki is waar je kunt zoeken.
als je zoekt op "volkstuin" kom je 2 hits tegen waar je mee verder kunt.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?search=volkstuin&title=Special%3ASearch&go=OK
Een paar klikken verder en je zit op deze pagina:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dallotments
.
Nogmaals ik denk niet dat het volkstuinen zijn.
Commodoortje (2017-02-24 08:48:23+00:00): Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits.
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
arcanma (2016-11-26 07:53:24+00:00): Dalla descrizione del changeset e dalle foto aeree il landuse risulta un campo di ulivi, quindi i tags più appropriati da inserire sarebbero:
landuse=orchard + trees=olive_trees. Vedi pagina https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Glossario_OSM