piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2021-10-24 14:55:51+00:00): Здравствуйте, Шагарова Анна.  
Этот пакет правок добавляет магазин "Вкусно Полезно" как супермаркет, но в это здание супермаркет (очень большой магазин) не поместится. Вероятно, вы имели в виду не супермаркет, а магазинчик здоровой пищи. В OpenStreetMap это будет shop=health_food
i5IoXTZhmQ61ragH (2021-10-23 19:04:09+00:00): Согласно указателям, транзитный грузовой транспорт Н-23 едет по этому маршруту, когда ТС с доставкой\обслуживанием в городе едут через ул. Электроники и ул. Цвейга.
neoLithos (2022-03-07 12:10:42+00:00): Hallo Wieland.

Du wirst dich sicher nicht mehr erinnern, aber weißt du, woran du erkannt hast, dass der Weg hier ein Fußweg ist?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/141111655

Ich war letzte Woche dort und habe dort:
"Fahrverbot für Fahrzeuge aller Art, Anlieger frei" vorgefunden.
Kurzum: das ist der Weg, der zu den Parkplätzen der Gartenanlage führt.

Weißt du das eventuell noch?
neoLithos (2022-03-07 12:10:59+00:00): PS.: OSM Stammtisch im April?
wielandb (2022-04-05 10:42:55+00:00): Also wenn ich die History richtig lese, habe ich nicht eingetragen, dass das ein Fußweg ist. :o
Allerdings: Normalerweise fallen mir Verkehrszeichen auf und ich hätte das eigentlich entsprechend eingetragen. :/
czubi (2021-10-24 10:53:04+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:office=therapist
gibts nicht mehr, versuchs mit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:healthcare
und bitte... OSM ist keine Werbeplattform!
czubi (2021-10-24 11:08:59+00:00): Wenn die wirklich erst 2022 starten dann mach doch bitte bis dahin einen Lifecycle_prefix davor
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
Adamant1 (2021-10-25 04:01:55+00:00): Yale has a "School of Management (https://som.yale.edu/). Which, I assume, is why it was tagged that way and not just as "management." So I'd appreciate it if you checked this and your edits and corrected the ones you re-tagged that shouldn't have been. Including this one.
Ser9ei (2021-10-23 22:23:56+00:00): тег name=* задаёт наименование объекта и используется вместе с тегами, уточняющими тип объекта.
В name пишутся ИСКЛЮЧИТЕЛЬНО названия.
И ТЕМ БОЛЕЕ не надо присваивать name всему подряд. Вы повесили тег name="Тюменский индустриальный университет" на тротуар. Продолжение внесения "мусорной" информации в базу может быть расценено как вандализм. При игнорировании замечаний и продолжении внесения таких правок пользователь может быть заблокирован.

Этот пакет я откачу. На будущее: лучше присоединяйтесь к сообществу в телеграм @ruosm и задавайте любые вопросы по внесению той или иной информации на карту и вам обязательно объяснят или дадут ссылку на вики.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112885309
Mashin (2021-10-24 04:02:35+00:00): hi, thanks for the edits. I guess the only thing is that the actual names of the faculty got overwritten by a generic tag.

Would you mind joining Discord (https://discord.gg/openstreetmap) or Slack (https://slack.openstreetmap.us/) to discuss tagging strategy or coordinate with our large scale edits?
czubi (2021-10-24 10:49:42+00:00): Hallo Nico, es wäre schön wenn du die Adressnodes auf den Gebäuden lassen würdest. Alternativ, bei ausgedehnten Objekten ginge auch aus Eingangstor zum Gelände. Das gilt auch für "Deinen eigenen" node, oder ist dein Geschäft auf der Straße?
Nico Kretzer (2021-10-24 16:08:36+00:00): Das Fotodesign NK ist mein Geschäft und die Filz- und Textilwaren sind meinem Schwiegervater
czubi (2021-10-24 18:09:12+00:00): Das sehe ich doch. Ändert aber nichts dran das der Adressnode und dein Geschäft nicht auf der Straße sein sollten. Ich habs auch schon verbessert.
Dawid2849 (2021-10-23 20:14:34+00:00): Sygnalizacja wyłączona od czasu tego wypadku (dzisiaj byłem na tym skrzyżowaniu): https://bilgorajska.pl/aktualnosc,24751,0,0,0,Skosi-sygnalizator-wietlny.html
InsertUser (2024-10-14 14:34:38+00:00): What is the rationale for changing this from a power plant to a generator? This seems to encompass the substation and waste processing as well as the actual power generation.
no details provided here (2024-10-14 14:57:38+00:00): Thanks for the query.  It was a while ago and came from when I was waiting at the adjoining Dobbies site to meet a friend (ie not my regular patch). IIRC someone on the site told me they were a 'generator facility'. The Wiki says a power plant can be a generator so it could be left, but as the site's public information styles itself as for generating, it seemed the right tag. Mea Culpa.
Falsernet (2022-02-23 17:54:33+00:00): It may be safer and more practical and the laws may be unenforced but the reason why will have been that they're puffin crossings linking pavements together, which you aren't supposed to cycle across. If for the sake of routing you'd put bicycle=dismount, I would support that a reasonable middle ground. Bicycle=yes is incorrect though as it implies a legal right of way for bicycles which sadly UK law doesn't support.
TomJeffs (2022-02-23 18:05:31+00:00): You may wish to read this

https://news.npcc.police.uk/releases/support-for-police-discretion-when-responding-to-people-cycling-on-the-pavement

I use this route very regularly. It is lunacy to route cyclists on the road here - they will die.
Falsernet (2022-02-23 18:12:03+00:00): Yes I agree it's an inevitability on a road with such a large amount of traffic. However this is just advice and technically speaking it would be incorrect to route them on the pavement, at least in so far as pedalling, as precedent has been set that a bicycle is considered a carriage and therefore can't legally use pavements unless otherwise designated. Doesn't mean I will follow the law or that cyclists should, or that it's enforced. But as far as OSM tagging goes, the legality must be taken into consideration.
Falsernet (2022-02-23 18:13:37+00:00): ^^If the local authorities have specifically said it's OK to cycle there then there is room for nuance but otherwise I don't think =yes is appropriate
salvoconducto (2021-10-23 20:57:34+00:00): Are these block forests really useful?
Ser9ei (2021-10-23 22:09:20+00:00): Зачем вы stream назначили layer=-2?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112886563
Lee Carré (2021-10-23 22:40:10+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
maraf24 (2021-10-23 22:00:44+00:00): Usunąłeś oznaczenia budynków z budynków.
Poza tym "stacja dystrybucji gazu" to raczej nie jest nazwa, ale opis.
maro21 (2021-10-24 11:43:28+00:00): operator=Tauron jest błędne, bo Tauron to tylko grupa spółek, w tym przypadku powinno być pewnie "Tauron Dystrybucja"
SP6ZOLW-7 (2021-10-24 16:27:50+00:00): Powiem tak nawet pracownicy już się gubią w tych spółkach więc wybacz
Martin Schädler (2025-10-06 10:04:07+00:00): Schmiedgasse 4 ist falsch.
Richtig ist Schmiedgasse 2
stasiu512 (2026-02-16 00:05:02+00:00): Cześć, wiem że edycja dosyć stara ale pamiętasz może czy ta dostępność jest na podstawie oznakowania w terenie?
syntex (2026-02-16 01:06:30+00:00): Z tego co pamiętam to chyba było dodane na podstawie złego stanu nawierzchni drogi i tego że jest tam wąsko, ale może było to na wyrost
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-14 05:50:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/660755738/history

why you think it is  building=annexe ?

What you mean by this building value?
ALu68 (2025-02-14 07:55:36+00:00): I just changed the desriptional polish name into an exitisting Tag.

The Tag-description is here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=annexe

If you know a better Tag, please go for it.
Marek-M (2025-02-14 08:13:35+00:00): Better tag for these buildings is `building=outbuilding`. It is widely used tag in Poland for that type of building. I will update them.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-02-14 13:15:52+00:00): > I just changed the desriptional polish name into an exitisting Tag.

Well, the problem is that "Budynek_gospodarczy" does not match description at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=annexe at all and in fact is in direct contradiction to it
Marek-M (2025-02-14 13:30:17+00:00): I forgot to tell that I already changed them in https://www.osm.org/changeset/162493603
ElliottPlack (2022-07-06 21:33:32+00:00): Hi there, I'm writing this on behalf of Maryland State Highway Administration. We own the land here and want to know where you'd come up with the name Urieville Park. Is that the GNIS Name?
cmitchell (2022-07-06 22:00:12+00:00): Yeah there was a point here from some previous GNIS import I assumed the name was correct because of that. I just turned it into an area
ElliottPlack (2022-07-06 22:13:12+00:00): Thank you!! Great work, keep it up.
shiftee (2021-10-26 15:37:01+00:00): Hi Kev,
I see you have tagged a park and wildlife park here.
Are these open to the public?
If so do they have a name?
There are also several nodes here tagged as natural=wood.
Those are for tagging a forests and should not be used in this situation.

Feel free to ask if you have any questions.

Mark
user_5359 (2021-10-24 15:18:58+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9196506900: What is the meaning of the tag bu=y?
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Dodko (2021-10-25 13:12:19+00:00): Ak už tam nie je zlatníctvo tak netreba ponechať značku shop=jewelry
DaveF (2021-10-23 23:24:23+00:00): Hi
landuse=grass is not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct.

I've flagged it as an error:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748#issuecomment-940155347
flohoff (2021-10-25 08:50:04+00:00): Moin,
nur weil ich es gerade sehe - Ich verbinde unterschiedliche objektklassen normalerweise nur wenn es sich überhaupt nicht vermeiden lässt.

D.h. ein Parkplatz shared keine nodes mit Gebäuden oder landuses. Das finde ich beim Nachberarbeiten immer viel einfacher. Und IMHo stimmt es halt meist auch nicht. Der Parkplatz geht ja oft nicht bis in den wald oder bis an das Gebäude. 

Nur so als Gedanke.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112889259
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
4004 (2021-10-24 23:26:07+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/320409917 это не пас. станция, теги пт не подходят
ezekielf (2021-10-27 01:56:34+00:00): thank you for restoring my work 🙂
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
eggie (2021-10-24 06:43:43+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
marczoutendijk (2021-10-29 12:51:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 113116724, 113119987, 113116075, 113118046, 113121184, 113120560, 113118671, 113123397, 113121747, 113117432, 113119315, 113122848, 113122263 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism
salvoconducto (2021-10-24 12:31:58+00:00): Why is this changeset so wide?
TravelingEditor (2021-10-24 12:42:40+00:00): I was looking for examples of Telsa chargers and a seabase to use in my local town both of which  are in far locations and both of which seemed to have issues to be resolved such as upgrading tags or removing a point for a lake. This wasn't initially intended to be a huge changeset.
lovelyfurball88 (2021-10-25 12:04:41+00:00): Try to keep your changesets in a small area, there's no problem with many small changesets.
TravelingEditor (2021-10-25 13:40:13+00:00): I can see how this could become alarming. That's practical advise, thanks!
marczoutendijk (2021-10-29 12:51:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 113116724, 113119987, 113116075, 113118046, 113121184, 113120560, 113118671, 113123397, 113121747, 113117432, 113119315, 113122848, 113122263 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of vandalism
archpdx (2021-10-24 00:28:25+00:00): Hi again,
The same thing applies here: fix the dragged node and use a gate node instead of the name
archpdx (2021-10-24 00:27:19+00:00): Hi Maggie,
It looks like you accidentally dragged a node in the 'through a one way gate' path. Based on your changeset comment it seems like this connects to a field, but this path seems to connect to a construction site.

Also, it's discouraged to use names to describe a feature instead of adding other tags (See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Please consider removing the name and replacing it with a barrier=gate node with oneway=yes.

Thanks,
archpdx
user_5589 (2021-10-24 02:00:23+00:00): You really do seem to be causing serious issues with this don't you.

They are small areas of grass which are mown. This is correct tagging for golf greens and golf fairways and golf tees. The wiki is not definitive as has been repeatedly said in other places.

Now admittedly I'm only going to revert your changes round the area where I actually live, but revert them I will.

If you remove the correct tagging again I will complain to the DWG.
DaveF (2021-10-24 10:51:46+00:00): Strange; I thought you already had.
Here's their email address:
data@openstreetmap.org

Please refer to my other changeset comments explaining why these edits improve the quality of the OSM database.
AgusQui (2021-11-01 04:29:03+00:00): En OSM mapeamos la realidad actual. Estas vías se encuentran desmanteladas, con rastros de terraplenes, alcantarillas, etc, por lo tanto corresponde el etiquetado de railway=abandoned. El tag proposed correspondería si no existiera nada previamente. Recuerda que en OSM siempre mapeamos la realidad actual.
thegreatloofa (2021-10-24 00:19:59+00:00): hmm no change
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:21:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:23:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
watmildon (2024-09-20 21:59:59+00:00): Thanks for adding the ballot box here! I am working county by county to get the rest of CO added. There's a few that remain elusive given the imagery I have. If you'd like to take a look I would be happy to send a list.
 
ex: apparently there's one here at "Fort Lupton Aims Campus, 260 College Ave, Fort Lupton, Colorado" but I cannot find it!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:22:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
marczoutendijk (2021-12-11 19:46:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114828622 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of incorrect edits to the map due to the use of incorrect tags.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
echostatic (2021-10-24 04:32:16+00:00): Adding link to Street Centerline Map: https://data.austintexas.gov/Locations-and-Maps/Street-Centerline/m5w3-uea6
eggie (2021-10-24 06:46:58+00:00): Welkom bij OSM..
Hier is iets niet helemaal goed gegaan.

Kijk even hier hoe een bedrijf toe te voegen.
Eigen bedrijf toevoegen 

https://www.onosm.org/ 

en 

 

https://osmybiz.osm.ch/#/11/46.87897/8.23975 

 

En video 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6edDUi1o9RA 

 MVG
eggie
michael60101 (2021-10-24 05:23:34+00:00): Please provide a source that shows the name as "Okarito". All signs I have seen display the name as "Ōkārito"
user_9850906 (2021-10-24 05:43:48+00:00): https://www.google.com/maps/@-43.2651863,170.2411643,3a,75y,194.06h,94.29t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sSGfE3A5OZ4sec35EKxK1eA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en-US
michael60101 (2021-10-24 05:50:07+00:00): The opposite side of the green information sign shows the correct and current spelling of the name.
user_9850906 (2021-10-24 05:55:10+00:00): OK, so it's 1 out of 3 signs saying "Ōkārito" in one direction (apparently altered with white tape), and 0 out of 3 signs in the other direction.  The current consensus in the signposted names is clear.
ortho_is_hot (2021-10-24 05:57:49+00:00): A note that Google Street View can't be used for OpenStreetMap edits
michael60101 (2021-10-24 06:00:15+00:00): My edits were based on information from the NZGB Gazetteer and LINZ.
user_9850906 (2021-10-24 06:03:18+00:00): Right, that's why it's correct to use "official_name" for "Ōkārito", because the LINZ Gazetteer lists it as such.  For "name", the 'on the ground' (signposted) spelling is used.  (Google Street View is a perfectly good way to show 'on the ground' spelling.)
SomeoneElse (2021-10-24 13:15:05+00:00): Hello,
Andy from OSM's Data Working Group here.
For completeness, OSM's policy on names is contained in https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Policies_and_other_Documents .
Generally speaking its up to the local community to decide what's in the "name" tag, and often (as seems to be the case here) translating official guidance into OSM tags isn't straightforward. I'd suggest that a discussion involving the wider OSM NZ community is the way forward. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-nz doesn't seem hugely busy, but https://openstreetmap.community/ suggests a couple of "Oceania" options too which may be worth looking at.
For completeness, http://osm.mapki.com/history/node.php?id=6411467557 shows the history of the tags on the object.
Best Regards,
Andy
wonderb0lt (2021-11-01 20:20:37+00:00): Hey - is "East Hym" a typo? Seeing as it is adjacent to the Gym storage, I think it should be "East Gym"?
cvieira (2021-11-01 20:26:27+00:00): It is indeed a typo. Good catch! I fixed the issue in a separate changeset. (113253583)
skquinn (2021-10-24 05:07:06+00:00): Oops. should have attributed web searches as well
marczoutendijk (2021-12-11 19:46:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 114828622 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert of incorrect edits to the map due to the use of incorrect tags.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
mueschel (2021-10-26 13:40:48+00:00): Hi,
"monitoring:particulate_matter_pm2.5" isn't used yet, but we do have
monitoring:PM10
monitoring:air_quality:PM10
Maybe you could change to one of these tags that are already used a few times?
❤️‍🔥 (2021-10-26 20:57:26+00:00): Hi, thanks for noticing this. I've changed the tags to monitoring:PM10 and :PM2.5
ff5722 (2021-10-25 07:15:40+00:00): Hello, where possible, could you try to use replace instead of deleting the old object? It only takes one shortcut in JOSM and it also saves not having to carry over the tags manually.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/utilsplugin2#Replace_geometry_.28Ctrl.2BShift.2BG.29

For example here the tags were added in version #5 by another mapper, but now there is no convenient way to see who added those tags originally.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/741704280/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/995989958

Thanks!
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
Fischkopp0815 (2021-10-24 05:52:39+00:00): CS-Kommentar sollte sein: Tagging Klärteiche geändert
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees
gabro00 (2022-01-24 13:03:52+00:00): Szia!
Széngetőket javítok és belefutottam ebbe a pontba: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3366381992. Látom nemrég jártál erre, emlékszel még hogy ez tényleg hegycsúcs és ez a neve?
rubasov (2022-01-24 13:35:26+00:00): Szia!

Fejbol nem emlekeztem volna, de talaltam kepet OKT tablarol. Az a tabla igy hivja. Az exif gps szerint itt keszult:

Latitude: N 47 34' 13.8300
Longitude: E 18 31' 29.4155
Altitude: 410.67 m

https://imgur.com/a/pj5ZTU1

Az OKT emlekeim szerint nem erintette magat a csucsot, ami szerintem csak par tiz meteres kiemelkedes lehet a kornyezetebol.
gabro00 (2022-01-25 13:50:15+00:00): Köszi a képet! Ugyan a turistajelzéseket kevéssé ismerem, de úgy látom ez csak ilyen "ha már itt vagy" érdekesség, külön jelzés nélkül.
Nem tudom mi legyen vele, inkább békén hagyom. Tegnap tettem rá fixme és note címkéket, majd megnézi valaki.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-10-07 13:24:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 127151699, 127148293 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert (on request from the community) due to the wrong use of tags related to trees and the naming of trees