piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mueschel (2016-12-09 21:20:39+00:00): Hi,
I found the keys ref:FLIK and ref:flik - can you just use one spelling? Btw, did you check that this source is licensed in a way compatible to OSM?

Jan
Stereo (2016-12-10 02:43:24+00:00): Hi Jan,

Yes, the data is CC-0, https://data.public.lu/en/datasets/referentiel-des-parcelles-agricoles-flik/

You’re right that it’s not good to mix the case; I’ll correct the lowercase to FLIK.
Stereo (2016-12-10 03:07:50+00:00): Done, https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44295866

Thank you for making me aware of this!
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:40:52+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
arvdk (2017-12-12 22:28:21+00:00): Maxspeed 2030?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1103688
arvdk (2017-12-17 17:57:56+00:00): changed to 30, since other streets are 30.
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:40:25+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
SomeoneElse (2016-12-06 16:34:39+00:00): For info, the _actual_ location of this buoy is supposed to be listed at http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/data/realtime2/13010.drift .  That hasn't updated in a month or so, but in theory should give the present location.  However, given that it's drifting around 0,0 it makes as much sense as any just to use that as the location, since that's where it's supposed to be :)
glglgl (2016-12-07 11:34:27+00:00): Thanks for the additional info. Maybe we should add this to the node.
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:39:31+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
highflyer74 (2016-12-08 07:56:25+00:00): Hello and welcome to OSM!

This POI is already mapped. Please make sure to look around of objects are already present before adding them.

Thank you!
Upendrakarukonda (2017-01-18 07:52:26+00:00): Hello  Madan Joshi,

Your contribution to OpenStreetMap is aprreciated. You gave numbers to the operator tag for ATM, which seems to be suspicious. Can you name the source you used to map them?

Regards,

Upendra.
piligab (2016-12-06 14:26:53+00:00): Hi Masatu.

Thank you for contributing to OSM. I noticed that you added a lot of points of interes which already exists (22 points in specific) http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44209730, can you confirm which is the right position of these points?
GinaroZ (2016-12-06 17:21:47+00:00): Hi, thanks for editing the map.

I notice you have drawn the outline of what looks like a farmyard, however you have not added any tags. Is this a farmyard, and does it have a name?
Skippern (2016-12-06 18:16:27+00:00): Ambos fontes google.com e here.com não e compatível com a licença do OSM, esses dados preciso ser redactados do banco dados.
naoliv (2016-12-06 18:20:34+00:00): Clébison, não podemos utilizar nenhum nome vindo de fontes comerciais (como o Google, Here, Bing, etc).

O único local que podemos prontamente copiar os nomes é do IBGE.

Teve mais algum outro local que você copiou os nomes do Google, Here ou outro local?
Clébison (2016-12-06 22:04:25+00:00): Olá naoliv e Skippern, boa noite.

Então, não entendi. Usei o Google Maps e o Here para consultar o nome das ruas. Apenas realizei a conferência. Esses nomes não são públicos? E no site do IBGE, onde encontro o nome das ruas para conferência?
smaprs (2016-12-06 22:21:01+00:00): São públicos só na rua.  
Mas no mapa e imagens do google, são copyright, propriedade do Google, pois o trabalho de coletar é deles. Por isso NÃO podemos usar nada visto no google.  
Os nomes do IBGE (que podemos usar), estão neste site aqui do OSM mesmo: ao editar, selecione na direita, onde diz "..imagem de fundo..", uma das 2 camadas do IBGE.
naoliv (2016-12-06 22:25:35+00:00): Não são públicos dessa forma.
Os nomes obtidos de leis municipais, placas de rua, mapa de prefeitura (desde que cedidos com a permissão para esse uso) podem ser utilizados. Nomes vindo mapas comerciais não.
Os termos de uso destes serviços indicam que qualquer cópia dos seus dados é considerado obra derivada (e, de forma simples, pode ser considerado como propriedade deles também).
É como se, ao copiar um nome de rua do Google, essa informação no OSM também se tornasse do Google.
Apesar da rua oficialmente possuir uma grafia definida, geralmente é possível perceber alguma pequena diferença na forma como são escritas nos mapas comerciais (geralmente abreviando alguma palavra, ou uma letra trocada por outra). Em alguns casos chega a ser proposital por parte da empresa, justamente para detectar cópia das informações.
No editor que você utiliza tem uma barra azul na parte de cima, com um botão "Plano de fundo" (ou "Background", se estiver em inglês).
Basta selecionar a camada "IBGE Mapa de Setores Urbanos" que terá as informações disponíveis do IBGE. É similar com os outros editores.
Esses nomes que você inseriu precisam ser removidos (justamente para evitar problemas legais).
Existe algum outro local que os nomes também foram copiados?
Apenas eles, na medida do possível, serão removidos.
Tudo bem?
Clébison (2016-12-06 22:56:57+00:00): Obrigado pelas explicações.

Peço desculpa, mas não tinha conhecimento da dimensão desse problema, mesmo parecendo hipocrisia, pois o nome de uma rua é único e pode estar igual em toda fonte de pesquisa. Como vocês devem vistoriar, minhas maiores edições estão em São Carlos, mas sempre usei o mapa em PDF disponibilizado no site do município, e em alguns caso peguei a moto e fui até a rua para conferir, então não vejo necessidade de reavaliar todo trabalho feito até aqui.
Fiz hoje a inserção dos nomes e até mapeamento de algumas ruas em Itirapina, pois precisava exportar o mapa da cidade para um trabalho, mas sabendo dessa camada do IBGE, passarei a utiliza-la.

Boa noite.

"Vivendo e aprendendo".
Clébison (2016-12-06 23:03:49+00:00): Apenas para complementar, acabo de conferir a camada do IBGE sobre minhas edições e a sorte está ao meu lado. Antes da minha edição as ruas com números estavam nomeadas com algarismos. Troquei pela grafia do número, e por ironia o mapa do IBGE está como alterei.
trigpoint (2016-12-11 17:16:34+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
Green Motion car hire is already mapped at Birmingham International, I am removing your duplication.
kempelen (2019-10-24 19:13:05+00:00): Te a postához raktad a könyvtárat, nem sokkal utánad valaki az utca másik oldalára, van ötleted melyik a jó? Nem esetleg a közösségi házban van?
kempelen (2019-10-24 19:13:26+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4541339593
user_5359 (2016-12-06 18:28:27+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Wenn ich das richtig sehe enthält die "Akte" eine ICEM-Modellierung (siehe http://www.3ds.com/products-services/catia/products/icem-surf/), die aber nicht etwa allgemein zugreifbar ist, sondern lokal gespeichert (siehe IP-Adresse 192....). Damit wäre dies eine private Information, die so nichts in OSM zu suchen hat.

Falls Interesse besteht, am 20.12. ist wieder ein Bonner OSM Stammtisch (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bonn/Stammtisch) , hier könnten wir eine Lösung besprechen.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-10-09 12:56:35+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3931979 ?
Giblet (2023-10-12 17:47:29+00:00): Have seen and commented.
eggie (2017-03-02 12:48:40+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
Alecs01 (2016-12-08 16:46:14+00:00): Please pay attention, you renamed "Cathedral" the "Madonnina" statue
MapTheWalk (2021-05-14 10:22:35+00:00): Hi, I recently tried unsucessfully to locate this trail. 
I was, however, able to follow the old KTM Jurong Railway all the way from Clementi Road to Sunset Way.
I also followed a different path through the forest to Sunset Heights.

I am hesitant about drawing the trail based on my own trace, since it will cross your previous work. Any input on the accuracy and current status of your trace?
Lmensgla (2021-05-14 10:30:08+00:00): This was a few years back. The problem with jungle trails is that they could close up from the foliage. I remember that we were following pink markers that someone else had put. 
If you feel like your trace is more updated, you could alter mine or add to it. The only thing i would object is to remove the trail but not replacing it with anything else. For example if someone is lost, i would rather they have any kind of info to work with rather than none.
MapTheWalk (2021-05-15 09:32:49+00:00): Thanks for your reply! My trace runs 20~30m parallel to yours, intersecting at some points, and ends at Sunset Heights instead of Brookvale Drive. I was following existing red ribbon markers as well.

I may resurvey the area again and make an explicit effort to locate your trail before considering it completely closed up and modifying it.
Lmensgla (2021-05-15 09:44:41+00:00): Ah. That’s not far off. I think since mine is quite old and you saw markers then I would say go ahead to modify it as it’s probably the most up to date trail. Thanks for asking and contributing to osm
DemoLogin (2018-11-13 23:45:15+00:00): Что значит "МФК"?
Согласно документации OpenStreetMap, сокращения в названиях, без особых причин, не допускаются.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%9D%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%8F#.D0.A1.D0.BE.D0.BA.D1.80.D0.B0.D1.89.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B8_.D0.B0.D0.B1.D0.B1.D1.80.D0.B5.D0.B2.D0.B8.D0.B0.D1.82.D1.83.D1.80.D1.8B_.28.D0.BD.D0.B5_.D0.B8.D1.81.D0.BF.D0.BE.D0.BB.D1.8C.D0.B7.D1.83.D0.B9.D1.82.D0.B5_.D0.B8.D1.85.29

Поправьте пожалуйста.
EIjas (2018-11-14 20:46:05+00:00): Тут поменял, сокращение это тут особо не к месту. Не помню, откуда я это взял тогда.

Но вообще борьба с любыми аббревиатурами ради борьбы - это какая-то путая деятельность. Давайте еще KFC и В.О. расшифруем.
DemoLogin (2018-11-14 21:15:51+00:00): Не утрируйте. Есть конкретное правило правило, есть конкретное несоответствие.
Для сокращений есть short_name.
SomeoneElse (2019-09-10 22:55:04+00:00): Hello,
Is the "hazard=yers" here perhaps a misspelling for "hazard=yes"?  
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Mdm is a search for them.
Best Regards,
Andy
bkil (2025-02-15 15:42:12+00:00): A name kulcs nem erre való,.ezeket javítani kell, és privát információkat sem szabad felvinni a térképre:
N5Z0RR-ék birtoka
Kedvenc kutyasétáltató útvonalam Erdő futó kör
N5Z0RR második otthona
feri hegyi fel és leszálló repülő nézegető rét
https://wiki.osm.org/Key:name
aceman444 (2016-12-18 22:59:06+00:00): Dobry den, opakujem, ze posuvat body len preto, aby "sa lepsie zobrazovali na mape" (ktove akej), ak to nezodpoveda realite, je zakazane. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
adrianojbr (2016-12-07 02:06:53+00:00): tomio, tomei a liberdade de reverter essa alteração, pois o traçado da sc-108 havia sido feito com base no strava. abraço.
Tomio (2016-12-07 13:45:15+00:00): Obrigado Adriano. Para fazer aquela edição, usei um track de julho de 2013, que coincidia com a imagem Bing. Devia ter olhado a camada do Strava antes de mexer na via. Abraço.
literan (2016-12-09 14:42:40+00:00): Добрый день! пожалуйста, не ставьте в тег name описания, вроде "Служебная парковка больницы". Для этого есть тег description.
Jan Westerhof (2016-12-06 18:16:18+00:00): Huh? POI added from http://yapis.geoclub.de/?? That website is also OSM based. Sounds like copying from OSM to OSM to me. Can you explain?
tiototo (2016-12-06 21:45:51+00:00): It is a tool to submit POI, pick position on map, add attributes. Whats wrong with that?
Jan Westerhof (2016-12-07 11:41:31+00:00): I think I understand. You map it into http://yapis.geoclub.de/ and that website posts it into OSM.
If you look at it from the OSM side, it looks like an addition has been made to OSM, from another OSM website. 
In other words: never mind, it's ok :-)
Andreas Binder (2016-12-06 18:44:44+00:00): Danke, jetzt passt die Gebäudeausrichtung. Nochn Tip: Versuche nicht immer die Objekte zu Löschen und neu anzulegen, sondern ändere die bestehenden Objekte einfach ab. Damit gehen keine Daten verloren und die anderen Mapper vestehen was geändert wurde. Gelöscht wird bei OSM auch, aber meist nur dann, wenn ein Objekt komplett falsch war.
GerdP (2017-08-22 14:57:11+00:00): Hi!
Please check highway=Küçük Anafarta
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458106270
I assume you meant highway=residential + name=Küçük Anafarta ?
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:25:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433380 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44213413 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:25:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433232 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44213522 because there was a problem with licence of data use
mueschel (2016-12-08 11:32:27+00:00): Hi,
could you check some of your bus stops? There are many foreign tags like on this node: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4149470376
Jan
brianboru (2017-04-17 09:06:19+00:00): Node deleted and replaced with standard naptan tags
surveyor54 (2016-12-07 20:51:52+00:00): Hallo heivo,
willkommen bei OSM.
Eine Betontreppe müsste mit surface=concrete  getaggt werden und nicht surface=unpaved, das wäre unbefestigt.

Gruß
surveyor54
literan (2016-12-09 14:29:05+00:00): и зачем надо было убирать правильный тег amenity=fire_station ? Добавляй свои теги, но не трогай, пожалуйста, чужие, если в них не разбираешься.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:17:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433209 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44213908 because there was a problem with licence of data use
dolphinling (2016-12-10 12:05:09+00:00): Looks like a bit of Seminary Street wasn't renamed here. (Why is it so many small segments anyway?)
Adam Franco (2016-12-10 22:30:20+00:00): Thanks for the catch! In some of my early landuse/land-cover additions I used highways as the edge of the land cover, spitting them apart at each change. As you noticed, doing so makes the highways very difficult to edit since they are made of so many tiny segments.

In changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44312978 I've now made most of the land-cover edges stand-alone and re-merged the highway ways.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44433171 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44214475 because there was a problem with licence of data use
b-jazz (2022-05-23 04:29:30+00:00): faceboob??

are you sure about that website url?
FreedSky (2016-12-10 12:00:47+00:00): 别瞎改线路等级
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 21:14:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44432722 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44215032 because there was a problem with licence of data use
trigpoint (2016-12-11 17:29:57+00:00): Please do not use OSM for personal markers, I am deleting this
Chetan_Gowda (2016-12-07 04:34:02+00:00): Hi ciutadavng, You have created lot of POI's which were concentrated at one place. Can you please confirm the source of the POI's. I don't think lot of exists at one place.
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:36:54+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please use amenity=parking (amenity=parking_slot is for a single car). And footways are ways not areas.

If you need help: You are welcome!
Jerome__ (2016-12-07 08:52:13+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi renommer ce point "Transports en Commun Lyonnais" et non laisser "Agence TCL la Soie" ?
Guillaume Mortier (2016-12-07 09:00:25+00:00): Bonjour Jérôme,
Ça doit être Osmose qui a suggéré de remplacer le contenu de 'name' par celui de 'alt_name'. Il a ce comportement bizarre depuis quelques jours... 
Bonne journée. 
Guillaume.
Jerome__ (2016-12-07 17:48:15+00:00): Merci pour votre réponse.
Je m'interrogeais car c'est la seconde fois en quinze jours que je rétablis votre modification. Osmose est à utiliser avec précaution ...
5m4u9 (2016-12-09 17:18:25+00:00): thanks!
user_5359 (2016-12-06 19:46:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your way. We don't paint any property to OSM!
skyper (2016-12-07 14:53:25+00:00): Vandalismus
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-07 15:33:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44238095 where the changeset comment is:
CloCkWeRX (2017-07-05 09:41:47+00:00): You might be interested in https://improveosm.org/#background=Bing&id=w458133607&map=16.64/25.85501/-100.14083 - you can see a lot of roads in the new residential area
kreuzschnabel (2016-12-06 19:12:05+00:00): revert of CS #43202935
Hjart (2016-12-06 20:03:04+00:00): Velkommen til vores projekt og tak for dine bidrag indtil videre. Jeg har rettet navnet på butikken her (se https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4541807090)  og tilføjet noget mere info.
dvdhoven (2016-12-06 20:27:08+00:00): Bij deze changeset hoort nog de vermelding survey 06-12-2016
escada (2016-12-14 07:56:10+00:00): Hallo,

bedankt dat je werkt aan de routering voor fietsers. De data kan nog veel verbeterd worden in België.

Toch even een opmerking over niet-eenrichtingsverkeer voor fietsers.

bicycle:backward=yes is volgens mij niet de juiste tag. oneway:bicycle=no is de juiste tag. Zie ook https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle "S1"

mvg
escada (2016-12-14 08:00:48+00:00): Je kan een bicycle:forward (of :backward) wel gebruiken als er ook een afzonderlijk fietspad getekend is in de andere richting: dan krijg je bv. de tags bicycle:forward=yes; bicycle:backward=use_sidepath, zie https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bicycle%3Duse_sidepath en als voorbeeld http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/111209827
trigpoint (2016-12-11 17:11:55+00:00): Hi, when I visited Albert Dock, there were no signs in Russian
eggie (2017-12-27 18:24:36+00:00): na een jaar weer aan het mappen.. alsnog Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
jaarek (2016-12-28 14:34:31+00:00): Dlaczego oznaczenie chatki zostało usunięte z z mapy?
mueschel (2016-12-09 21:27:14+00:00): Hi,
I found the tag "Intervención =VdE" on many objects. This is not a common tag. Could you explain the meaning or change to another tagging?
Jan
naoliv (2016-12-06 21:29:51+00:00): Erick, de novo inseriu um monte de nós grudando as pontes com as rodovias.
É impossível fazer isso se você tiver corrigindo cada objeto manualmente, um por um.
mueschel (2017-02-05 21:44:05+00:00): Wurde hier die Ampel tatsächlich wieder abgebaut?
http://osm.org/node/339513244
Vor ein paar Monaten war sie noch da.
mirror176 (2017-06-30 22:01:52+00:00): is the turn restrictions at north 35th avenue and west lawrence lane correct? Listed as bing and mapillary as sources but I could not see it through those sources or make sense of it. Validating a second turn restriction there too no longer connected to a way is how I found this area.
Alecs01 (2016-12-08 16:50:39+00:00): Grazie e benvenuto, ho corretto il tag principale in office=company che credo maps.me non conosce
user_5359 (2017-01-04 18:08:28+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
RI-Improve (2017-01-13 14:53:05+00:00): Hi, I know this area out of personal experience. I have a friend living in the nearby Newport.
RichRico (2017-04-28 22:02:23+00:00): Hi Woodpeck_repair, thanks for contibuting with osm.
I found a edition in one of your changeset, you modified the tag of a bridge `bridge = yes` and `bridge:sctructure=suspension` by just `bridge=suspension` acording the wiki the previous edition is correct.
maybe you have another explication
woodpeck (2017-04-29 16:22:11+00:00): The problem is that someone simply hit the "fix everything" button on the JOSM validator for a very large number of items. While this did probably do the right thing in many cases, it also did the wrong thing in many cases. The JOSM validator is not a tool to be used indiscriminately like that, and I had to revert the whole edit (I couldn't go through 17k things manually and check which of them were good - that's the task of the person using the validator).
naoliv (2016-12-07 02:45:46+00:00): Adriano, a sigla da rodovia é SPA-149/215 mesmo :-)
Dá uma olhada na página de número 9 daqui para ver http://www.der.sp.gov.br/Website/Arquivos/MALHARODOVIARIA/codificacao.pdf
poeiradasestrelas (2016-12-07 15:33:26+00:00): ooops. foi mal. vivendo e aprendendo. jamais tinha visto um código de rodovia com  /. pode deixar que à noite eu corrijo.
naoliv (2016-12-07 16:28:58+00:00): Tem municípios que também usam a barra na sigla https://github.com/OSMBrasil/validador-josm/blob/master/Rules_Brazilian-Specific.validator.mapcss#L102
naoliv (2016-12-07 18:52:56+00:00): Ah... outra coisa.
Elas também tem "Municipal" no nome. Por exemplo, https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodovia_Municipal_Domingos_Innocentini
Pelo jeito é só reverter o changeset inteiro mesmo, que ref e name ficarão corretos.
Abraço!
adrianojbr (2016-12-07 20:51:25+00:00): reversão concluída.
naoliv (2016-12-07 02:55:15+00:00): Superfluous way that should be deleted? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/458176600
bobspin (2016-12-07 17:58:33+00:00): That might very well be correct. Way 458176600 was created by splitting way 227215867 (v4) and way 458176599 was created by splitting way 283845170 (v7). Before splitting the ways they looked like this: http://www.directupload.net/file/d/4562/8qyl7isn_jpg.htm . The relation that I edited contained both of the original ways.
naoliv (2016-12-07 18:10:52+00:00): Usually the river/stream define the administrative boundary here in Brazil.
Most of the time people draw the river without reusing the existing way (which already represents the boundary); or they make some mess using the river and the other way :-)
It's should be safe to deduplicate ways when this happens (ie, to use only way to represent both the river and the boundary).
bobspin (2016-12-07 18:15:00+00:00): Ok. My goal was just to create a valid geometry by doing as few changes as possible.
naoliv (2016-12-07 18:17:07+00:00): Sure! I saw that you fixed the boundary :-)
Thank you!
bobspin (2016-12-08 06:03:37+00:00): deleted way 458176600, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44250341
datendelphin (2017-01-04 17:47:36+00:00): Please use a dedicate user account for such mechanical edits
Link to the wiki page describing your edit from the changeset (description=)
I map in Switzerland, I think you should announce the edit on the local mailing list.
nyuriks (2017-01-05 10:59:30+00:00): My apologies, I have simply added the corresponding wikidata tag to the admin areas that have wikipedia tags. The iD does it automatically whenever you set Wikipedia tag. We should probably at some point automate this for all nodes, but this is a separate and long discussion ahead :)