piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Warin61 (2022-07-06 07:15:46+00:00): Hi,
The OSM guide is "one feature=one OSM entry". The building is one feature, the Library is another feature. Some buildings have names while a feature within has another name. Some buildings contain more than one 'feature' .. think of a shopping mall. 

The node with amenity=library will render by itself. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9557048958 So there are no 'penalties' for separating the building and library. A node with club=* will not render ... well not on the standard render, so I am think9ing about putting the ones I have changed/added back on to the buildings.
evo_evz (2022-07-06 12:58:45+00:00): Yeah right ok. I never heard of that before. Do you have a wiki page in regards to the one feature guide?

I would have thought that would have been fine if there were multiple businesses within the one building but when the library consists of the whole building then it seems logical to make the whole building the library. 

So there are no penalties for doing it as you did but are there any advantages?

Many thanks
Warin61 (2022-07-06 13:36:37+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#One_feature,_one_OSM_element

Advantages ... if the feature moves it is easier to move the single node. The building may be operated by one firm while the library may be operated by another. There are probably other considerations two .. 'My' local library has other things in the same building but in other separate rooms so separate OSM entries is best there. I find shops can move around so a single node does well for them, even places like Subway move. Pub do stay put thankfully. 

None of this is black or white .. there is a lot of grey.
evo_evz (2022-07-07 06:15:35+00:00): Ok no worries but there's heaps of single places that cover the whole building, there's even a feature on JOSM that makes it easy, the Replace Geometry feature.

It definitely makes sense esp if there are more than one business within the building.

Anyone I can put it back to how it was no probs or if you want to, whatever suits.
tastrax (2022-03-01 10:45:58+00:00): Hi folks - This shouldn't be an area, or a service road. It should be a single line as there is no barrier island separating the lines of travel. I will make the correction
GinaroZ (2022-03-02 17:26:48+00:00): Hi, the changing of the road tags is fine but just to make you aware that Bing imagery is generally slightly out of alignment in the UK.
You should use the OSMUK Cadastral Parcels overlay to fix the offset before editing (about 2.5,-1.5 here), so the roads line up properly with the the OSM data :)
Falsernet (2022-03-02 17:29:05+00:00): Good to know, I'll look into that
Jmapper007 (2022-03-03 22:23:24+00:00): That's a pretty big neighborhood!
MapBoy001 (2022-03-05 22:10:03+00:00): Yes, it sure is... don't know how that happened!
ipple (2022-03-07 02:34:48+00:00): It appears one of your nodes was placed at 0, 0.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:46:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
michael60101 (2022-03-25 02:45:09+00:00): Please be more careful with your edits. It seems you accidentally changed relation from a forest into a dam.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/11699318
trevloon (2022-03-01 05:16:01+00:00): 63 Warnford  Crescent
Leigh Park,Havant
wireguy (2022-03-06 15:43:57+00:00): broken relations:
Santa Rosa Mountains State Wilderness relation 207472
I think way 1036024153 needs to be added to the relation
kurisubrooks (2022-03-01 07:07:33+00:00): Hi mate. Just wanted to check why you deleted the building part of the apartments over the shop layer below, as the previous history appears to have been correct as of Feb 2021 imagery. Thanks.
Fizzie-DWG (2022-03-02 05:46:21+00:00): It looks like the building has the same outline all the way around. We usually only map an additional "building part" when it's distinct from the rest of the roof e.g. a high rise tower coming up out of a flat roof
kurisubrooks (2022-03-02 06:03:05+00:00): Hi again. Checking a third-party source for reference for the shape of the building, I believe the original building part was correct. The first floor is consistent with the building outline the whole way around, but levels 2-10 are indeed different from the base outline, which the building:part reflected. I also compared the rendering of the building to two building renderers and it was correctly tagged and rendered in both, producing the actual/correct shape of the building as it is in reality. Would you consider reverting the deletion of this building:part? Thanks.
Fizzie-DWG (2022-03-02 06:11:47+00:00): Not a prob! Just checking - the driveway on the north side is actually elevated? & the "cut out" facing Broughton St - does that go all the way down to ground level or is it on top of the first level?
kurisubrooks (2022-03-02 06:18:06+00:00): From DCS and Bing, it's hard to tell but I think the road is flat (not elevated), up to where it goes into the cut out on the right-hand side (parking lot under the northern side on the ground floor), but continuing on is then a steep drop into an underground garage. From Bing imagery, I can see a few cars peeking out from behind on the northern edge, so I think it's the whole rear of the ground level. I can't see anything to suggest it goes up to the first level, so assume 0-1 = shops+carpark, 1-10 = apartments.
Fizzie-DWG (2022-03-03 04:30:09+00:00): That should hopefully now fix it? Thanks for your suggestions!
Steelwing (2022-03-01 05:38:40+00:00): Дома кривые, будет переделано
4004 (2022-03-01 08:42:54+00:00): your grounds for calling this vandalism? was this not discussed within the OSM UA community?
Monstrofil (2022-03-01 09:00:14+00:00): Reverted change was discussed within community.
4004 (2022-03-01 09:03:39+00:00): you guys might want to take it up to DWG before starting an edit war
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-01 12:48:40+00:00): > Reverted change was discussed within community.

In such cases linking discussion in edit description is recommended and typical
Monstrofil (2022-03-01 12:50:05+00:00): > In such cases linking discussion in edit description is recommended and typical

I'm sure that it is also "recommended" to write comments to changeset before revert, isn't it?
ququruzka (2022-03-17 18:55:21+00:00): what about reverting again ? 

who is support war against Ukraine ?
please, write your full name.
Our lawyers will create abuse tickets to UNO (United Nations Organization ) for detailed court examination. 
UNO declare Russia as aggressor. All others sites/opinions would be observe as participation in war.

Thanks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-17 20:44:46+00:00): @ququruzka

Please cease your legal threats not based on anything close to reality.

I would advise to focus for example on documenting Russian war crimes.
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-03-17 20:47:02+00:00): > please, write your full name. 

1) users are not obligated to do this (though some like me do this)

2) suggesting that someone is obligated to do this is misleading

3) demanding this while having "ququruzka" as username and not signing with even pretended name is hilarious
ququruzka (2022-03-27 08:37:39+00:00): My question was ignored. What's the next result ? All Europe should be "disputed=yes" for yours correct understanding the situations? YES / NO ? If you would do NOTHING, NOTHING is happening.
mavl (2022-03-01 14:04:44+00:00): Здравствуйте. Эти улицы уже есть на карте. Этот пакет правок добавил новые улицы прямо поверх существующих и был отменён, так как из-за него возникли ошибки топологии.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-11-07 16:03:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128599619 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint to the DWG, reverting some changes made by osmose.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/128063226 .
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-27 20:29:43+00:00): شكرا لك وقد قمت بإضافة الوسم:
amenity=water_point
لأجل الإشارة إلى أن المكان لتعبئة المياه بكميات كبيرة وذلك حسب ما ينصح به على الويكي:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwater_point
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-03-04 02:59:54+00:00): You added a duplicate way in this changeset
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117966694
govvala (2022-03-04 08:03:30+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and providing the feedback.
Apologies, for the adding a duplicate road segment as this error happened due to another mapper editing the same segment at the same time.
Additionally, I have also fixed another duplicate road in the changeset #118082108.
Thanks once again for fixing the error, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
govvala
azakh-world (2022-03-01 09:16:09+00:00): Hello!
Now there are two almost identical route_masters for Violet Line, also some other errors appeared. Could you please fix them? The validation page will help https://cdn.organicmaps.app/subway/india.html

Best regards,
Alexey
contrapunctus (2022-03-04 03:47:01+00:00): Hm...probably related to the problem I've been having in JOSM recently, where I download all route and route master relations before editing, but the latter aren't downloaded :\
contrapunctus (2022-03-04 04:38:40+00:00): Seems like you've already deleted the duplicate relation. As for the other errors on that page, I'm not sure what the tool wants me to do... 🤔️
azakh-world (2022-03-04 07:59:01+00:00): Thanks for the reply. I've fixed the errors by myself this time. They should disappear after the next validation cycle.
azakh-world (2022-03-09 10:04:13+00:00): contrapunctus, hi again!
There are too many stations along Violet line now. There should be only one railway=station object at a station carrying all names with translations, wikipedia links and so no, and the nodes on rails should have public_transport=stop_position +railway=stop tags. These objects (+ subway entrances if mapped) should be combined with public_transport=stop_area relations
Could you correct this like it's done at https://www.osm.org/relation/13907113 ?
contrapunctus (2022-03-09 16:53:08+00:00): Hey, azakh-world. I didn't realize the existing stop positions had station tags on them too! 😱 I've traced two stations and moved the station tags to them, I'll do the others over the next few days.
PlaneMad (2022-03-02 15:49:29+00:00): Thank you for all the mapping in Badalwas. I've made some corrections by removing duplicates about Badalwas city and tagging it as a village as per https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/India/Places
impiaaa (2022-03-01 15:47:25+00:00): OpenStreetMap maps what exists currently. If something is yet to be built or has recently been destroyed, use an appropriate lifecycle prefix: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix or feature=construction https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Comparison_of_life_cycle_concepts#.3Ckey.3E_.3D_.3Cstatus.3E_.2B_.3Cstatus.3E_.3D_.3Cvalue.3E
Here's my change https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117984726
ndm (2022-03-01 13:10:55+00:00): Why are you marking private roads as access = no
ndm (2022-03-01 13:11:36+00:00): Also access is public until the gate
Noen (2022-03-01 20:24:43+00:00): Bortsett fra et par nybygde garasjer i OSM som ikke er i matrikkelen som ble slettet så er jeg fornøyd med dette endringsettet.  Det var mye igjen som hadde vært kjedelig å ta manuelt.
Bruker undelete pluginet på garasjene.
Scottie0001 (2022-03-02 01:55:17+00:00): Removed Jaycar store in Caboolture as it is non existent and none at the location on the Jaycar website
Nakaner-repair (2022-03-04 15:23:31+00:00): reverted by changesets 118097098, 118097028, 118097009, 118096988, 118096693 due to violation of the Automated Edits Code of Conduct and introducing wrong information into the database
Mariusz Dykierek (2022-03-26 21:34:02+00:00): Prawdopodobnie takie zamknięcia powinny być tagowane przy użyciu restrykcji czasowych: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
W teorii, nawet jeśli zapomni się te restrykcje usunąć "ręcznie" dane mapy będą odzwierciedlały stan faktyczny (przy fałszywym założeniu, że nie będzie "obsuwy" w remoncie).
Nakaner-repair (2022-03-04 15:23:28+00:00): reverted by changesets 118097098, 118097028, 118097009, 118096988, 118096693 due to violation of the Automated Edits Code of Conduct and introducing wrong information into the database
axelr (2022-04-03 10:54:07+00:00): Ist die Abfahrt und Auffahrt Bochum-Wiemelshausen wirklich gesperrt, oder ist das ein Bearbeitungsfehler ?
pkn (2022-04-03 11:36:10+00:00): Die Auf- und Abfahrten sind immer noch gesperrt. In dem Bereich wird der Nordhausen-Ring zur A 448 umgebaut. Die Brücke der Universitätsstraße soll auch ersetzt werden.
Keine Ahnung, wie lange die Arbeiten noch dauern.
gabro00 (2022-03-01 13:37:50+00:00): Szia!
A linkeket inkább forrás mezőbe rakd, mert a karakterlimiten túl (255<) levágja a hozzászólás végét.
siparon (2022-03-01 13:59:11+00:00): Köszönöm a tanácsot, akkor legközelebb így teszek.
Maradona11 (2022-03-28 21:07:29+00:00): G'day,
The relation has the tag public_transport=platform, which is incorrect for a Busroute. 

Regards,
M
Syl (2022-03-02 10:10:49+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap !
Vous avez supprimé le piano de la gare, il n'existe plus ? Je l'avais vu sur place il y a deux mois.
Franek49000 (2022-03-02 10:28:28+00:00): Bonjour,
Le piano éxiste toujours ! Je débute dans le logiciel et j'ai du le supprimer ou le recouvrir par mégarde. Désolé !
Syl (2022-03-02 13:18:17+00:00): Pas de soucis, je viens d'annuler la suppression. N'hésitez pas si vous avez des questions.
Đuro Jiří (2022-05-14 20:49:09+00:00): "Via Motta - Via Battilana" è giusto?
matteo1799 (2022-05-24 07:06:47+00:00): Sì, è così anche da street view
woodpeck_repair (2022-03-01 17:06:03+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 117891378, 117892123, 117892145, 117897402, 117897508, 117906117, 117908207.
nevw (2022-03-02 03:57:29+00:00): Hi
all the items that others mapped and you have now deleted seem to still exist in this area.
Why have you deleted these items from trhe OSM?
nevw (2022-03-08 10:01:39+00:00): no response, reverted this changeset.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-07 04:43:24+00:00): تم عكس هذه التعديلات التخريبية والتخريب مهما كان كبيراً بالامكان عكسه:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118181323
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/118181316
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-03-07 04:52:26+00:00): هذه مجموعة صور من أحد السكان المحليين:
اسم القرية حسب اللافتات الموجودة فيها ويظهر اسم "المجيصة" وليس أولاد مرزوق! :
https://imgur.com/a/8Lh19KQ
، اسم القرية على عامود في بداية القرية:
https://imgur.com/elgU9RL
، اسم مدرسة سعيد ابن المسيب في المجيصة (يظهر اسم القرية والمدرسة!):
https://imgur.com/q7Sdayg
،اسم مدرسة ابتدائية ومتوسطة المجيصة:
https://imgur.com/TRoc1SP
ويظهر فيها اسم القرية واسم المدرسة 
لذا نرجوا عدم التخريب واحترام أن هذه الخريطة خريطة عامة يستخدمها الناس وينتفعون منها في شؤون حياتهم وليست ملكاً شخصياً لكم!
maro21 (2022-03-03 22:28:19+00:00): This cycleway has already been on the map.
user_5359 (2022-03-03 07:35:47+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo
ref:FR:FINESS	630791275
ref:FR:FiNESS	630785699
What is the correct value of the reference number? If there are two reference numbers please use nodes inside of the building.
eggie (2022-03-01 10:33:43+00:00): Beste Hugo  Svp niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus met editor iD.
MVG
eggie
Tilia_J (2022-03-01 11:43:36+00:00): Beste Hugo, ik zie dat je méér in het veld "name" zet dan de naam alleen:

-"Cafetaria - Luchroom" zie ik op de website niet bij de naam genoemd worden
-"Otterlo" idem, daar is al de "addr:city" tag voor
Alleen "Klein Zwitserland" hoeft in de naam. "Restaurant" staat al op de amenity tag en de rest kun je aangeven met "delivery=yes" en "takeaway=yes".

Succes en map ze!
eggie (2022-03-01 18:33:14+00:00): Beste Hugo  Wat is jouw bron voor Grand Cafe Kruller.
Dat is toch gewoon een woonhuis.
Kijk je wellicht op google maps en neem je daar de gegevns van over. Dat is in OSM niet toegestaan. 

Ik zal deze chageset terugdraaien.
Graag reactie.. Dan kunnen we helpen om op de juiste manier zaken toe te voegen. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-03-01 18:35:38+00:00): Restaurant Kruller op dorpsstraat 1 verwijderd
Tilia_J (2022-03-01 12:58:52+00:00): Hier gaat iets niet helemaal goed. Waarom voeg je "Grand Café Kruller" toe aan dorpsstraat 1 terwijl dit een woonhuis is en waarom overschrijf je tourism=hotel met amenity=restaurant?
eggie (2022-03-01 18:42:04+00:00): Grand Cafe Kruller op Dorpsstraat 1 verwijderd.
Vermoedelijk overgenomen van foutieve locatie google maps?
A-d-r-i (2022-03-01 11:33:15+00:00): Bonjour,
Je me permets un petit retour concernant la modification pour "Petra Grossa" ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9547002395 ).

Je ne vois pas d'inconvénient à modifier le lieu-dit en sommet, néanmoins localement il est connu comme étant un petit massif montagneux plus qu'un sommet, d'où ma saisie en "locality". Il n'est d'ailleurs pas référencé, sauf erreur de ma part, comme un sommet dans l'IGN (SCAN25/PLAN IGN/BD TOPO).

Deuxième chose, il est toujours préférable de modifier les attributs plutôt que supprimer puis recréer. En effet on perd l'historique du point ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9545034421 ) qui pourrait être utile à un futur contributeur.

Merci pour votre lecture et bonne journée !
PhilLL (2022-03-01 14:57:39+00:00): Bonjour A-d-r-i,
Oui, c'est un petit éperon rocheux remarquable pour y être passé à côté dimanche dernier, comme celui d'A Punta situé au SW de Carbini, qui lui ne figue carrément pas sur IGN, alors qu'il est chargé d'histoire ! Pour Petra Grossa, d'où son nom, Osmose m'a aussi fait cette remarque via un poi identifié comme un pic et non un lieu-dit.
Mais vous avez raison, il est peut-être préférable d'opérer au changement d'attribut sur le poi plutôt que sa suppression et création d'un nouveau poi à l'historique rompu. J'ai eu aussi cette tentation de le modifier plutôt que de le supprimer. Désolé, et je retiens volontiers votre remarque.

Bonne journée.
A-d-r-i (2022-03-01 15:14:19+00:00): Merci beaucoup pour votre réponse !

Et oui je viens de voir que vous avez bien amélioré la cartographie de Carbini 😊
Tilia_J (2022-03-01 13:06:55+00:00): Graag invullen wat je wijzigingen zijn. 

En zit restaurant Lara wel op Nieuwe erf 5 en niet een ander nummer?
eggie (2022-03-01 10:30:23+00:00): Beste Hugo,

Het is al verschillende keren verzocht. Zou je concreet commentaar willen toevoegen bij je uploads.
MVG
eggie
ivanbranco (2022-03-06 09:26:01+00:00): Hi Stephen,

names should not be descriptions. So name=garden is wrong, leisure=garden is enough.

Same thing with:
name=hut+building=yes
you could just use
building=hut
tenzul (2022-03-02 12:07:28+00:00): Hallo Gäste-Info,

Namen sollten keine Beschreibungen enthalten. Das es sich um ein öffentliches WC handelt ist aus den anderen Tags bereits klar. Wenn es keinen Namen gibt, (z.B. Max-Mustermann-Toilettenhäuschen) kannst du den Tag löschen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117973959
tenzul (2022-03-02 12:15:34+00:00): Hier ist der Name der "Ferienwohnung Am Himmelreich ..." auch sehr lang. Dieter Axt ist ja nicht der Name des Gebäudes sondern eher der operator=...
Wenn zwei Einrichtungen im selben Gebäude sind, kannst du für jede einen eigenen Punkt mit Namen und Adresse einfügen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117973959
tenzul (2022-03-02 12:00:26+00:00): Bei Telefonnummern kannst du die internationale Schreibweise verwenden: +49 7443 964541
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117974249
Vinber-Pro (2022-03-02 16:10:55+00:00): Salut,
j'ai l'impression que les noms décrivent souvent
exemple Accueil Collectif de Mineurs "Les P'tits Loups", le nom c'est "Les P'tits Loups"

je fais une repasse dessus
Vinber-Pro (2022-03-02 16:18:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9550078678
COCMOP (2022-03-03 10:13:57+00:00): Salut. Le principal est que les centres de loisirs remontent bien en tant que tels et qu'il n'y ait pas de confusion avec crèche, M.A.M ou autre Relais Petite Enfance.
tenzul (2022-03-02 11:58:17+00:00): Hallo Gäste-Info,

Schön zu sehen, wie du dich um den Ort kümmerst.
Beim `access`-Tag gibt es eine feste Menge an möglichen Werten. Du meinst wahrscheinlich access=customers (Kundenparkplatz)
Die Parkdauer kannst du mit `maxstay=X hours` beschränken.
Um die Parkfläche schön rechteckig zu machen, kannst du die 5. Ecke löschen und dann mit der Taste Q die Fläche orthogonalisieren.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117974425
maraf24 (2022-03-02 15:05:19+00:00): Pole obejmuje las:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/289067561
SHARCRASH (2022-03-01 10:51:20+00:00): + access corrected, source:access added
JhowieNitnek (2022-03-02 13:14:03+00:00): Hi, Ik zie dat je allemaal gebouwen aan het hertekenen bet aan de hand van satalietbeelden maar die zijn niet accuraat genoeg, je moet meer op de RGB kaart letten. Dat is een officiele cadaster en gebouwenkaart van de vlaamse overheid
LePirlouit (2022-03-02 13:23:25+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Building_and_address_import/AIV_GRB_building_import/Import_plan
Abdoul ilah (2022-03-08 12:39:18+00:00): Village
Noen (2022-03-02 21:38:31+00:00): Hei! Ser ikke helt motivasjonen for å endre klassifiseringen av Hegreveien. Den ser ikke ut som en boligvei for meg. Det er knapt noen boliger som har avkjørsel direkte til denne veien.
Dette er vel heller det Vegvesenet ville kalt en «samlevei»?
asgeirberland (2022-03-03 10:04:22+00:00): Grunnen til jeg endret det var fordi jeg så veien var klassifisert som "motorway". Når jeg ser igjennom historikken nå så virker det som den var "unclassified". Men ja, gir det mening å tagge den som "Tertiery road" heller? Isåfall kan jeg gjøre det.
Noen (2022-03-03 15:35:17+00:00): «tertiary» passer for viktige kommunale veier, «unclassified» for mindre viktige. Du som er lokalkjent kan bestemme hva som passer best.
asgeirberland (2022-03-03 15:43:23+00:00): Setter den da til "unclassified" :)
jeslop (2022-03-01 11:13:21+00:00): Hola Ogayar. ¿Qué has querido representar con ese nodo aislado?

Lo elimino. Te recomiendo que empieces por aquí:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Gu%C3%ADa_de_principiantes

Un saludo y bienvenido a OSM.

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
tastrax (2022-03-08 03:52:58+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
ralley (2022-03-01 17:44:11+00:00): Please do not "test" changes like this in OSM - it is a live map in use by many people and your change has tagged a cycleway that does not exist - reverting
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/117975272
RicoElectrico (2022-03-02 11:14:50+00:00): Cześć, dzięki za aktualizację. Budynki powinny mieć kąty proste. Zaznaczasz budynek i wciskasz klawisz Q. Jest to opisane w samouczku dostępnym z menu pomocy, który bardzo polecam przejść w całości :)
user_5359 (2022-03-08 08:25:25+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning of the tag Świętego = Jana Pawła II?
Mordechai23 (2022-03-08 09:57:52+00:00): fixed
flohoff (2022-03-02 16:15:46+00:00): 
Hi,
ich habe das mal zu einem highway=construction / construction=secondary geändert und die access restriction da runter genommen.

Das ist ja nicht gesperrt sondern eine Baustelle oder?

Ich habe eben diverse routingänderungen in PB gesehen und auf die osm-owl liste geschrieben.

Flo