piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Vinber-Pro (2022-04-17 08:47:40+00:00): Bonjour,
attention car à priori vous ignorez des alertes et dans le cas présent c'était par exemple une route qui a été déplacé par erreur, traversant plusieurs bâtiments.

Et j'ai pu constaté aussi par exemple l'ajout de point au milieu de batiment alors que ce batiement était déja qualifié comme étant une bibliothèque.

Attention aux doublons

Bonne cartographie
ynx (2022-10-30 07:52:37+00:00): А почему вы отметили этот участок (и другие) как платный? Платный участок начинается с 21 км - https://avtorosdor.ru/trassa-m4-don/
ZinaidaZ (2022-10-31 06:59:07+00:00): Добрый день. Так и есть, платный участок начинается с 21 км, и я с 21 его и отметила. 
Может быть, оставите координаты, где что-то не так?
ynx (2022-10-31 07:47:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/404995149#map=13/55.5545/37.7512 - например вот эта линия. М4 бесплатный до, примерно, Сидорово (это дальше чем ЦКАД).
ZinaidaZ (2022-10-31 12:50:21+00:00): Этот вэй находится на 24 км, который входит в формально платный участок дороги.
Поэтому я обозначила его тегом toll:designated=yes (как раз для обозначения, что он формально платный), а не тегом toll=yes (за проезд по участку взимается плата)
ZinaidaZ (2022-10-31 12:52:08+00:00): Таким образом можно разделять участки дорог, считающиеся платными (https://yandex.ru/maps/1/moscow-and-moscow-oblast/geo/m_4_don_93_y_kilometr/2033401026/?l=sat%2Cskl%2Cstv%2Csta&ll=37.971410%2C54.974231&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=344.386071%2C-4.951180&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=37.962913%2C54.982268&panorama%5Bspan%5D=111.060371%2C60.000000&z=17) от участков дорог, за проезд по которым взимается плата
ynx (2022-10-31 13:20:52+00:00): Хм. Просто вы используете какой-то тег, который только вы и используете. :)
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/toll:designated=yes#map
Возможно, конечно, в этом есть какой-то смысл, но...
Ладно, в любом случае спасибо за ответ.
mavl (2022-05-20 15:56:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
eggie (2022-04-12 12:24:46+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Glassman (2022-04-14 17:20:14+00:00): according to the companies website - they are in suite 203 of this building. Instead of showing the company as the whole building - just add a node inside the building. Can you review your edit and fix?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119616558
alexashh (2022-05-22 10:57:39+00:00): Привет! В OSM не принято ставить name на точки чтобы показать что дорога плохая. 
1) это субъективно и невалидируемо.
2) если очень хочется, то надо ставить тег smoothness на участок дороги, а не на точку. Он будет чуть правильнее, но всё ещё субъективным.
habi (2022-08-28 08:31:59+00:00): Ciao
Schön hast du hier die Hausnummern/Adressen erfasst.
In Bern sind sie Adressen aber (teilweise schon seit mehreren Jahren wie hier) auf den Eingangsknoten abgelegt, damit das Fussgänger-Routing gut funktioniert.
Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/745167315/ (wo du die Hausnummer hinzugefügt hast) gegenüber https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/537539228/history, wo die Hausnummer schon seit 13 Jahren ist.
Gruss,
habi
Jakka (2022-04-13 06:31:28+00:00): Het verwijderen van deze gebieden is niet 100% beste oplossing.
Gesloten is daarom nier verdwenen.
Nog zichtbaar aanwezig.
access=no zou een tussen oplossing kunnen zijn. Of de huidige functie ...
jonassalen (2022-04-13 07:37:55+00:00): De parking in het noordoosten is wel verdwenen en gewijzigd van functie. Het is aangeplant als stiltebos. Voor de parking in het zuiden klopt je uitleg. Hoe pas ik dit aan?
Jakka (2022-04-13 07:50:26+00:00): Ik tuur je een privé bericht met uitleg.
philippec (2022-04-16 08:03:46+00:00): Er zijn aangepaste parkeerplaatsen voor personen met een rolwagen (parking kasteel).  Zijn dat dan sommige gehandicapten ?
En vermits stad Mechelen OSM enkel maar gebruikt, wordt het er niet duidelijker op.
user_2066394 (2022-04-12 15:32:00+00:00): Was war in der Bearbeitung geplant? Du wolltest shop=horse ändern in shop=equestrian ?
user_2066394 (2022-04-12 16:14:16+00:00): Hat sich erledigt, im zweiten Blick wird's klarer :-)
HirschKauz (2022-04-12 18:20:40+00:00): Hi! Ja, hatte "unseren" Loesdau bei Lechenich korrigiert und dann auch mal die anderen angeschaut und vervollständigt. Grüße!
eggie (2022-04-12 12:26:49+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feeedback In OSM kun je het beste bijtaggen op de bijbehorende adresnode. Die staat meestal ergens op het gebouw. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-04-12 12:29:43+00:00): ... en waar is hier Aluminiumstraat 10?

Niet hier...
eggie (2022-04-12 12:37:37+00:00): Beste.. 

De info heb ik samengevoegd met het nieuwe adres is Zoetermeer. De vermelding hier heb ik verwijderd.

MVG
eggie
JeroenHoek (2022-04-12 15:26:20+00:00): You can't use building=* on a node.
Lialiuika (2022-04-12 15:31:42+00:00): I found this opportunity on OSM wiki here https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dwarehouse
Jillis inactivE (2022-04-12 18:25:22+00:00): Hi, that's only valid when there's no building outline available. Which isn't the case here. So your tagging is incorrect.
We're discussing the correct tag at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75361
Lialiuika (2022-04-12 18:58:22+00:00): Well, I understand that building=warehouse isn't best way to tag such places. And of course I can correct it to more suitable. But for now as i understand from translator you also have no one ready decision for such cases.  Am I right? I can correct all this edits when you find decision that would be good enough if you don't mind. As you noticed in your thread there is no opportunity to add name to whole building as for polygon because there are a lot of activities there, so it must be a tag that would be applied to node.
Jillis inactivE (2022-04-12 19:03:12+00:00): Thank you. Yes, you're right, and I don't mind. We'll let you know the outcome.
Lialiuika (2022-04-12 19:07:16+00:00): Thank you, will wait for your response.
Jillis inactivE (2022-04-24 14:00:01+00:00): Hi, I think the contibuters, including JeroenHoek settled on amenity=warehouse as the best tag for Picnic locations.
Lialiuika (2022-04-25 13:00:07+00:00): Hi! Thank u for answer, I'll redo everything in 2 days
Jillis inactivE (2022-04-26 05:55:03+00:00): Your 'co-worker' KVI0n already edited them. This got some attention in the same forum thread.
Jillis inactivE (2022-04-26 08:17:17+00:00): Negative attention, as there's much more wrong than the warehouse tag that's been corrected now.
Please join at https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75361&p=2
You can do so in English.
Lialiuika (2022-04-26 15:30:43+00:00): Thank you, I am on vacation from 4/18 so didn't track of others corrections. I addressed the problem of necessity of additional dialogue to colleagues.
DeBigC (2022-04-12 11:52:54+00:00): About the fixme on the western extent of Ardan road - I went with 6. This is guesswork, but more realistic as the extensions aren't the same size.
InfernoRiot (2022-04-12 12:23:11+00:00): Comment to correct, change only includes addition of new housing areas. Text was auto completed from a previous edit.
eggie (2022-04-12 15:20:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback   Wat was je bedoeling?
Dit lijkt me niet de haven van Rotterdam. 
Je toevoeging haal ik even weg... 
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-04-12 15:22:47+00:00): reverted by changeset  #119626677
SekeRob (2022-04-14 10:13:16+00:00): Hi

This ring of Српско-македонска маса is reported as unclosed in the OSM Inspector along the Bulgarian/Serbian border. Unglueing is fine, using the forest border as good candidate to close the boundary would be great

ciao
Duja (2022-04-14 10:46:58+00:00): I saw it, but I'm unsure what to do. Those "regions" were recently added by a user who did not respond to my CS comments. They should be either removed or tied to country borders. Their original boundary is still there (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1037504911), but drawn on top of existing country boundary, which pisses me off.
SekeRob (2022-04-14 18:04:01+00:00): That's something I hate, lines top of lines. A single line can be used for multiple roles. I've seen one in France which was part of 9 different boundaries. The one I try to avoid using for other purposes is roads. Except for routing and road relations a no-go for me. As proposed, I'd take the forest edge and close it up.

ciao ancora
Duja (2022-04-15 07:42:14+00:00): Just not with forest edge, please. That will render the bloody forest even more difficult to divide. :( For the time being I'll use that original boundary, and discuss with Serbian community what to do. He drew (imported, actually) similar overlapping ways all over the country borders.
Duja (2022-04-15 08:00:48+00:00): Temporarily fixed through changeset #119739769,
SekeRob (2022-04-15 08:20:29+00:00): OK

Whatever is going on with country borders, more and more show up in Inspector meaning some element got misused. Saw Netherlands, Belgium now being flagged too.

Cheers
ivanbranco (2022-04-14 21:46:02+00:00): Ciao Fausto, grazie per queste modifiche!

vedo che hanno già corretto, ma te lo dico nel casso mappassi nuovi civici. Gli indirizzi su OSM italia li mappiamo come nodi in corrispondenza dell'ingresso o della targgetta col numero. Inoltre scriviamo i civici in minuscolo e senza separatori, quindi ad esempio 50a invece di 50/A. 

Buon mapping! :)
Fausto Franzoni (2022-04-15 06:33:33+00:00): Grazie. Quindi pe ril mio comune saranno visibili a breve? Possiamo tenerci in contatto? fausto.franzoni@gmail.com 3288327827
ciao
Fausto Franzoni (2022-04-15 06:34:19+00:00): Questo due edifici devono essere separati. A sinistra Via Milano 50a, quello a destra Via Barac
ivanbranco (2022-04-15 10:07:51+00:00): Le modifiche vengono aggiunte al database istantaneamente, per la visualizzazione invece dipende da dove le visualizzi. Io sul sito di OpenStreetMap vedo già gli indirizzi mappati.

Ho separato gli edifici.
Fausto Franzoni (2022-04-15 12:10:00+00:00): Grazie!
mike140 (2022-04-12 13:46:49+00:00): насколько я понял правки делались по снимкам Mapbox, но сравнив их со снимками Maxar по постройкам в ближайших населенных пунктах, мне показалось что Maxar будет посвежее
Jakka (2022-04-13 06:36:40+00:00): Tweemaal access=no Reden van die =no.
Dan kan je ook niet bij drinkwater ... 
Definitief buiten gebruik dan onderdelen verwijderen.
Gebouw staat er nog building=yes laten staan.
legofahrrad (2022-04-22 16:02:37+00:00): Moin bithopper!
Darf ich fragen, woher du die Infos über die beiden Straßennamen hast, die du ergänzt hast?
Du hast weder am Objekt selbst, noch am Änderungssatz eine Quelle angegeben.
Beste Grüße,
legofahrrad
bithopper (2022-04-22 16:42:59+00:00): Ich habe eine Wohnung im ersten Baufeld erworben und der Lageplan enthält die Straßennahmen. Hausnummern gibt es noch nicht.
legofahrrad (2022-04-23 11:33:46+00:00): Super, danke für deine schnelle Rückmeldung!
Schönes Wochenende! ;-)
Falsernet (2022-08-03 17:47:15+00:00): Hi, why have you moved roundabout names to individual nodes?
ashs_as (2022-04-13 11:00:33+00:00): Hello tablettes,
I noticed you added many "footway" tags that's overlapping with the residential streets.
Could you fix the overlap ways?
Examples of ways you added need to fix:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051267587
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051267236
If you need any help please let me know.
Regards
ashs_as
Maptapper (2022-04-12 13:21:57+00:00): Fantastic stuff. Thanks tomhukins.
4004 (2022-04-18 01:20:45+00:00): а остальные без изменений? там одинаковые номера квартир в 1 и 2 получаются
Dodko (2022-04-13 07:26:21+00:00): Pre koho je priechodná táto cesta?
Lebo teraz ste zrušili akoby tam žiadna cesta ani chodník nebol.
Dlhos (2022-04-27 16:16:05+00:00): Nie je to cesta je  to chodnik, na konci so zabranou, umoznuje prechod kocika, bicykla
Dodko (2022-04-28 08:20:47+00:00): Zmenené na chodník pre peších.
Po dom Kakatka 13 som nechal ako cestu.
Vinber (2022-04-17 15:38:57+00:00): Bonjour et merci pour ces ajouts Corentine29.

Bonne carto

PS : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue
SekeRob (2022-04-25 07:31:20+00:00): Hi,

The object is now flagged as having been mapped both as a way and a relation. "Object tagged twice as way and relation
relation 13853764 analyser josm iD edit. I've removed the way and only left the Uni grounds in the relation.

cheers
SekeRob (2022-04-25 07:40:54+00:00): BTW, why is the  Uni grounds area at layer=1?
Misha Boiarkin (2022-04-25 07:51:11+00:00): I doubt I can answer your question, perhaps you can suggest the correct option?
segubi (2022-09-03 14:34:45+00:00): ... noch ein Tipp zu den Radwegen. Sie sollten immer in der richtigen Richtung angelegt werden, damit die Tags bicycle:oneway=yes richtig interpretiert werden können, falls sie jemand setzt. (sonst schickt ein Router die Radler auf die linke Seite, gerade, wenn es nicht erlaubt ist). Habe ich nur an einzelnen Stellen korrigiert.
yelisey90 (2024-03-25 22:14:43+00:00): No, it doesn't work that way. The road is accessible to bicycles, motorbikes and all other even if it is unpaved. Remember, there are MTB bikes than can perfectly ride on such a road. Specifying correct smoothness & surface is the only thing needed; the routing should be selected by the router depending on those tags.
Frans S (2022-04-12 13:37:18+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not accurate mapped and in accordance to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn.Please pay more attention on following the outlines of a building (with extentions).

D: nodes of buildings linked to other buildings or roads.
E: 78 out of 450 Rectangular Buildings not squared.They are mostly strickt rectangular. 

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119621388
Frans S (2022-04-19 15:58:46+00:00): Hello. In addition to my previous mapping. 
PLease do not include the shadow of a building in your mapping. It is not a part of the building
Best regards
VictorIE (2022-07-08 22:08:13+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/644000525

building=hangar :D
azakh-world (2022-04-12 13:21:28+00:00): Обсуждение:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119321704
Kovoschiz (2022-04-13 07:52:10+00:00): It's not a `=motorway` though.
Badojo (2022-04-12 17:40:57+00:00): Ne može biti primary jer nije državna cesta
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
dgitto (2022-04-12 19:42:16+00:00): benvenuto in OSM
Farmacia Bruno (2022-04-12 20:00:03+00:00): Grazie
DP24PH (2022-04-12 14:01:20+00:00): Thank you very much for realigning the proposed highway wherein I initially wasn't sure of such alignment on my initial mapping. Moreover, divided highways will be mapped once construction have commenced.


DP24
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-14 09:29:22+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/relation/364082. What is the meaning of the tag alt_de = Sjunik? Did you mean alt_name:de?
aleksaJov (2022-04-15 10:57:23+00:00): Hello,

Thank You for comment. Yes, the missing proper key tag value for alt name was. The alt_name:de is now corrected.


Regard,
Aleksandar
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:22:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_15549478 (2022-04-13 04:01:58+00:00): revert changeasset possible edit
user_15549478 (2022-04-13 12:21:17+00:00): Revert 5th Avenue to 8th Avenue
user_15549478 (2022-04-13 12:21:52+00:00): Delete layer 5th Avenue to 8th Avenue
voschix (2022-05-02 20:21:33+00:00): Hi. What is the source for the proposed roads? 
Volker (Padova)
fayor (2022-05-02 20:29:11+00:00): Non chiederlo a me, non sono stato io a inserirle. Io ho solo corretto il tag
voschix (2022-05-02 21:10:10+00:00): Scusami. Sbagliato io.
stevea (2022-04-21 03:31:47+00:00): I do not believe that you have permission to enter these route data into OSM, doing so is a violation of our ODbL.

The copyright is owned by Adventure Cycling Association and you do not show that you have permission to enter these data.  Please remove them.
user_5359 (2022-04-14 08:45:51+00:00): Hello! Please have a look onhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1046521211? What is the meaning of the tag NORTH = ULU-E033N10_02?
UNGSC-Mariateresa (2022-04-14 09:15:22+00:00): Hello, thanks for the warning, it was an error and has been resolved :) greetings, Mariateresa
MxxCon (2022-04-13 06:45:46+00:00): Don't forget to update sidewalk tags on the road from "both" to "separate"..
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119623639
Frans S (2022-04-30 13:27:03+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping here.
I reviewed your mappings and see that you mapped just a few open areas as a building.
Please always check if there is a shadow visible. It proofs that the object is above ground level and probably a building.
Also weird spots are mostly no buildings in this area.
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119623645
eggie (2022-11-22 15:48:44+00:00): Jan  'k Zag wat eilandjes onderwater.. Die heb ik even bovengehaald.
Groet
eggie
mueschel (2022-05-01 11:43:17+00:00): hi,
could you check this restaurant? The tag 'diet:cru = yes' looks like a mistake.
FenyMufyd (2022-04-12 23:41:00+00:00): Hello, could you explain on how did you get this street name data from?

The github link said the data is based from KartaView, but I could not find any KartaView street imagery on Palangkaraya
harika_d (2022-04-13 07:07:48+00:00): Hello FenyMufyd, Thanks for verifying the edit. I referred to the latest KartaView photo to add street name https://kartaview.org/details/5040697/0/track-info
Thanks again for validating. Regards!
SekeRob (2022-04-12 21:08:37+00:00): Nota i correzione nel CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7172692 . I farmland non e 'inner', condividere perché e tocca 2 foresti e cambia i role in outer per questo.

ciao
eggie (2022-04-12 15:24:31+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Het is gebruikelijk om alleen de adresnode te gebruiken om op bij te taggen. Dus niet en op een node en op het gebouw. Er zijn adresnodes beschikbaar. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-04-12 15:27:59+00:00): De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adesnode. De info en het adres heb ik verwijderd van de gebouwomtrek.
MVG
eggie
zluuzki (2022-04-12 17:57:49+00:00): Please be a bit more careful. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/184762906/history is certainly not a power generator.
Frans S (2022-05-01 13:11:20+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119625571
herman17 (2022-05-02 15:59:16+00:00): Переход был нарисован не в том месте. Я проверил на местности - теплотрасса немного дальше по улице. Нарисовал трубу и подвел переход к ней. 
И еще на что я обратил внимание — этот мост был нарисован поверх уже существующего участка дороги. Так лучше не делать. Если надо что-либо "врезать" в уже нанесенную линию, то сперва ее надо разрезать и отсоединить (X, D) и в этот образовавшийся конец дорисовать новый элемент.
danieldegroot2 (2022-04-13 22:06:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051306965
Oops, c'est maintenant un rond point mais oublie pas les relations route bus/hiking/.. ca peut etre complique; demande un autre contributeur pour aider avec ca.
Fait attention en futur.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3132032

Merci pour regarder a ca.

Salut,

Daniel
Enock4seth (2022-04-13 10:17:18+00:00): Thanks for mapping but deleting well mapped existing objects as you did here is not a good practice. See what I mean here https://osmcha.org/changesets/119610361/
Kyere (2022-04-13 10:32:53+00:00): Hello Enock,
thanks for the feedback. looking at the link, i do realise i didn’t do a good job. i saw during editing that different map overlays displayed structures with their boundaries slightly out of sync. could that be a reason?

again, i edited the building because while it looks like one huge structure, it actually is made of distinct blocks that are closely together. i’d wanted this to be reflected on the map.

i’m looking forward to receiving more reviews, considering i’m an amateur mapper!
gscholz (2022-04-13 04:47:15+00:00): Hi Bonfilsa,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines by adding the "Oranjestad city" boundary to the "Aruba" boundary relation:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-70.00600&lat=12.51106&zoom=12

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119626305

Can you please fix ths?
Kind regards
Guido
Mason1007 (2022-04-12 23:08:47+00:00): There's actually a road there. The mapbox satellite shows there isn't a road there. Bing Maps shows a road there, and it is more up to date.
rjhale1971 (2022-04-13 01:16:44+00:00): I'll get it added back! I should have checked more image sources during the class.
herman17 (2022-04-12 16:07:52+00:00): Ха, только пару часов назад делал обход этой местности и сделал заметку, что надо бы уменьшить парковку и добавить ряд гаражей, но ты меня опередил и внес эту правку 😃
herman17 (2022-04-12 16:08:59+00:00): P. S. гаражи следует оквадратить (кнопка Q), а то они сейчас форму трапеции, хотя в реальности прямоугольные
Kitanit (2022-04-12 16:13:08+00:00): спасибо, сейчас будет
jcr83 (2022-06-14 14:35:26+00:00): Drinking water was already in the map. I removed it.