piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Alan Trick (2017-04-10 19:10:53+00:00): Hi, I don't always do this myself, because I'm lazy, but when making a large change to an object like the industrial, it's good to update the source tag.
woodpeck (2017-03-28 21:31:17+00:00): You claim to have aligned something to Bing in this changeset, but neither Bing nor Mapbox imagery show anything else than a large blurred area here, certainly nothing from which one could move a node. The source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
Jenny Johal (2017-03-30 19:03:38+00:00): Hi Woodpeck,

This changeset was a single upload from an edit I made on the entire island feature as seen in this changeset view: https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=47222149, where I aligned the entire island to Bing.  It’s blurry, but I felt the imagery is good enough to make improvements to the geometry anyways.  This edit was made as part of a MapRoulette challenge for Island and Shoreline alignment, and yes, there is a small group of us working on fixing these features in OSM.
Spanholz (2017-03-28 07:56:06+00:00): Welcome to OSM,

please use the tag man_made=mast for cell phone towers. Have a look in the wiki if you are unsure.

The name tag is used for official names like "Smiths Bakery".
winslowkr (2017-03-28 02:56:37+00:00): This is also to be an extension of the levee trail to the 63rd street trail. I think the line could be better shown also.
muralito (2017-03-29 03:20:36+00:00): No vi las sugerencias, pero por compatibilidad con mas consumidores le pondria ademas  highway=speed_camera y maxspeed=80 al nodo "device".
ignaciolep (2017-03-29 12:15:45+00:00): El nodo "device" (ubicado al costado de la vía, donde realmente se encuentra la cámara) ya tiene la etiqueta highway=speed_camera.

Al estar fuera de la vía no tiene sentido ponerle maxspeed al "device" ya que los consumidores deberán leer la relación enforcement para saber qué porción de la vía se encuentra afectada por el radar y es ahí donde está definido el maxspeed.

Entiendo que con una relación enforcement el nodo "device" solo sirve para renderizar la cámara donde se encuentra realmente.

Me falta probar OsmAnd cuando se actualice el mapa para confirmar que funcione bien. También pensaba probar con Magic Earth. ¿Conocés alguna otra app que alerte sobre radares? y en particular ¿Conocés algún consumidor que no lea la relación enforcement?

Por otra parte publiqué en mi diario un instructivo sobre como cargar estos radares de fotomulta usando JOSM e iD, te agradecería que lo revises y me comentes si encontrás algún error: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ignaciolep/diary/40754
muralito (2017-03-29 13:38:48+00:00): El instructivo esta bueno, completo y bien explicado. 

Yo uso los puntos de alerta para Garmin que genera Martin http://www.i-nis.com.ar/osm/pois , y creo que solo usa los highway=speed_camera sin leer las relaciones ( hay limitacion de Germin o del mapa, solo hay capacidad para alertar en un radio del POI, no si esta o no controlando esa via por la que va la ruta prevista o por la que vamos circulando u otra cercana)

Eso por un lado. Por otro te comento que en Montevideo las camaras a veces apuntan en un sentido y a veces en otro, el control esta, pero hasta que no pasas por ahi nunca sabes si efectivamente te mide o no. O sea el mismo "device" va en varias relaciones que es como lo estoy mapeando. 

Con respecto a la velociad que se mide es correcto y lo ideal que lea la maxspeed de la via, de hecho aca tenemos dispositivos que controlan varias vias simultaneamente y no todas tienen la misma maxspeed, pero (siempre hay un pero) para lograr mayor compatibilidad aunque se pierda detalle, a ese highway=speed_camera le pongo el minimo de los maxspeed, cosa de advertir siempre bien y evitar multas por distracciones.
ignaciolep (2017-03-29 13:57:03+00:00): Este este otro changeset tengo un device con dos relaciones, una para cada sentido. No quería sumar complejidad en el instructivo pero voy a ver la manera de aclararlo.
También voy a comentar en el hilo de los POIs de Martin para confirmar si puede leer la relación o estamos obligados a poner el maxspeed en el device.
Gracias por tus comentarios!
muralito (2017-03-29 14:20:34+00:00): Estuve pensando un poco mas sobre le tema, y no necesariamente el maxspeed del enforcement es igual al maxspeed de la via.  Como ejemplo, aca las camaras anunciaron que tienen cierta tolerancia, entonces en una zona de 60Km/h, si vas a 61 km/h zafas, solo multan al que va a mas de aprox 70 Km/h. (dijeron del orden de 20% la tolerancia).

Entonces en estos casos que planteo, el maxspeed distinto en la via a del device modela adecuadamente la realidad...
muralito (2017-03-29 14:21:57+00:00): me explico mejor que no quedo claro, quise decir que el maxspeed de la via sea distinto al del enforcement (ya sea en la relacion o en el nodo device)
ignaciolep (2017-03-29 14:33:25+00:00): Que caso raro! Que les den un margen de tolerancia me parece que es algo anecdótico, sino que cambien los carteles.
Por otro lado, yo no diferenciaría el maxspeed de la cámara y de la vía, la cámara está para fotografiar a quien supere la velocidad máxima de la vía, ambas deberían tener la misma velocidad máxima.
muralito (2017-03-29 14:45:52+00:00): Justamente es en lo que quiero hacer foco, eso no es asi en todos los casos. Será raro, pero es asi. La camara "ve todo", pero el "enforcement" (la multa) se aplica a una velocidad distinta (mayor por el margen de tolerancia) a la de la señalizacion vial puesta en la calle.

Entonces, tiene que haber espacio para ambas opciones, si la autoridad competente establece una velocidad máxima para una vía, y luego controla con otro criterio, es algo de la realidad, y que es correcto poder mapear.

El navegador por ejemplo podria pitarte por ir a mas de la velocidad maxima de la via (o a veces tiene el mismo navegador una opcion de tolerancia), y ademas advertirte del control solamente si vas mas pasado de la velocidad a la que realmente se multa.
muralito (2017-03-29 14:49:38+00:00): Aclaro que lo que he mapeado hasta ahora le he puesto la misma velocidad a la via que al enforcement, pero es por desconocimiento de la tolerancia que tiene cada enforcement.
ignaciolep (2017-03-29 14:53:59+00:00): OK, entonces en el caso que planteas, la relación enforcement (y el device de ser necesario) tendrían maxspeed=120 y la vía tendría maxspeed=100
Davide_sd (2017-03-28 11:53:04+00:00): I'm sure you have read the documentation about service=driveway (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway) where it's stated that such a way is to be used with access=* tag appropriately.

It is my understanding that it is impossible to say if a road have access private, permissive, etc.., by looking at satellite images. Thus, you should avoid changing tags from highway=residential to highway=service + service=driveway. Please stop doing this.

You obviously have no idea about the access=* tag. Please, please, read the documentation first!!!! Please.

This kind of edits should be performed only by residents of the specific roads. Clearly, you are not living there so you have no idea what you are changing. Stop this sabotage action.
geohacker (2017-03-28 03:23:34+00:00): Hey Mijail Herdez! Welcome to OpenStreetMap!  I see you are having a great time editing the map.

I wanted to confirm with you the walls you are adding actually are on the ground. The satellite imagery shows none. Let me know! Thank you, and welcome to OSM!
Davide_sd (2017-03-28 11:52:44+00:00): I'm sure you have read the documentation about service=driveway (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway) where it's stated that such a way is to be used with access=* tag appropriately.

It is my understanding that it is impossible to say if a road have access private, permissive, etc.., by looking at satellite images. Thus, you should avoid changing tags from highway=residential to highway=service + service=driveway. Please stop doing this.

You obviously have no idea about the access=* tag. Please, please, read the documentation first!!!! Please.

This kind of edits should be performed only by residents of the specific roads. Clearly, you are not living there so you have no idea what you are changing. Stop this sabotage action.
Tiamate (2017-12-25 10:25:21+00:00): amenity=childcare
?
阿根廷科考站

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dchildcare
AdVerburg (2017-03-29 11:42:16+00:00): You added here a non-existing building. This is conflicting with the aready drawn (in the real world existing) buildings.
The name for the power plant is (together with it's power) on the way:  https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/311472382
So why this addition?
ligfietser (2017-03-30 08:27:21+00:00): Christy, you have added wrong items on the map so I have reverted your changeset 47217719.
carlotta4th (2017-12-22 20:19:05+00:00): The water department and splash pad are not physical water bodies and therefore incorrectly altered as "natural water." This area's residential tag had also been incorrectly altered to "park." The rest of the changes seem fine, but please take care to look up tags next time and ensure you are using the proper one.

Aka: "this mapping system is used by many individuals and companies, not just Pokemon Go. Do not incorrectly label things to benefit yourself in-game."
Spanholz (2017-03-28 08:28:09+00:00): Thanks for cleaning up vandalizing changesets.
Spanholz (2017-03-28 08:36:54+00:00): Hi,

There was already a Rite-Aid pharmacy added here.
tonyf1 (2017-03-28 06:10:54+00:00): Hi
You are welcome to add your shop to OSM if you have one, but OSM is for real objects on the ground and not suited for virtual data like PO box and websites. Also changeset comments are important, not for product promotion. Please give reasons why your map edit should remain.
nammala (2017-03-28 05:14:17+00:00): Hi  Brad Yochum,

Welcome and thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap (OSM). OSM is the real map of the world, the data we add should be ground truth and valid. Please don't add fantasy data. Make sure you add valid data to the map. 
Let me know if you need anything.

Regards,
nammala
Supaplex (2017-04-07 15:08:06+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
woodpeck (2017-03-28 21:41:58+00:00): You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery is too blurry to discern the shape that you have drawn so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
Edward Munch (2017-03-30 03:32:18+00:00): Hi Woodpeck,

Bing imagery was the correct source.  It’s not great, but the resolution was good enough to make improvements to the really angular island geometry that existed prior to my edit.  There is a small group of us working on tasks like this from MapRoulette focusing on small island geometry.

Thanks!
mavl (2017-10-08 08:19:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52723087 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47115936].
francoLI (2017-03-28 05:47:14+00:00): e' stato messo il link della protezione civile nazionale che è un avviso generico,
ed il link della protezione civile regionale che corrisponde grossomodo all'Avviso ai naviganti.
Se non conoscete come funziona la protezione civile siete pregati di non cancellarlo
woodpeck (2017-03-28 22:10:36+00:00): In this changeset you fixed the coastline of Gosti island, but there is a lot of extremely jagged other coastline nearby that you did not touch. May I ask why you focussed on this one island?  Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?
Jason Roy (2017-03-30 02:39:36+00:00): I focused on Gosti Island because I found it through a Maproulette challenge designed to find jagged islands that can use better alignment. I am part of a small group of OSM users working on improving these islands.
R0bst3r (2017-03-28 11:39:28+00:00): Hallo robbyeins,

Danke für deine Eränzungen und willkommen (zurück) bei OSM.

Wie du vlt siehst, hat sich einiges getan.
Sollten Fragen auftreten, hilft dir wiki.openstreeetmap.org bestimmt weiter. Ansonsten kann ich ebenfalls per Nachricht über die Profilseite weiterzuhelfen.

Viel Spaß noch!
R0bst3r
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
PierZen (2017-03-31 14:52:39+00:00): Relation : 7114883  a enlever. Inutile, croisement d'une rue à sens unique.
iuliah_telenav (2017-04-04 12:30:51+00:00): C'est vrai, relation:7114883 est une croisement d'une rue à sens unique mais le signe "only_straight_on" est visible sur OSC et il interdit par défaut "u_turn" dans le Rue des Équinoxes. N'est pas correct?
PierZen (2017-04-04 13:20:53+00:00):  il interdit par défaut "u_turn" 
C'est votre interprétation. Aucune indication.
iuliah_telenav (2017-04-05 08:44:32+00:00): Ce que je voulais dire, c'est que si un signe only_straight_on est là, cela ne veut pas dire qu'il interdit seulement d'aller à gauche ou à droite, mais aussi de faire un u_turn, et donc le signe n'est pas complètement inutile. Est-ce une faux interprétation? Pourqoi? Si oui, je peux supprimer le signe.
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
trigpoint (2017-03-28 07:31:22+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
According to the address you have given you business is on Queens Road, yet for some strange reason you have added it in the middle of Morrisons.
I have reverted this as it is clearly the wrong place, assuming you have an actual office that customers can visit you can add that in its correct location but please lease out thre verbal diarrhea, only mappers see these comments and blatant sales talk just annoys us. A changeset comment such as 'added a taxi office' is all that is needed.
trigpoint (2017-03-28 07:35:10+00:00): Just realised that you have not simply created a spam node in the wrong place, but had deleted information from the Weybridge place node, that is considered vandalism.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2018-01-05 17:18:17+00:00): Hi. You added a house here ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/483165329 ) with name="Luka's residence". That sounds more like a description? Is that the actual name of the building?
andi9876 (2017-03-29 07:44:55+00:00): Hello Dear, 5215 nodes added? I reverted ok.
Bunthoeun seng (2017-03-29 08:03:09+00:00): Hello,
It's type of buildings in coastal area in my previous project. Somehow, we found it's useful for other users.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-03-29 16:29:21+00:00): Hi,

I have been watching editing activity in Batangas City, but only this time I need to ask about your edits. Is this part of a mapping project led by the City Government of Batangas using OpenStreetMap,? Are you local to the barangays where you map? Are you mapping those POI's as a city government employee?
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
literan (2017-03-28 11:15:18+00:00): Пожалуйста, остановитесь! все ваши правки противоречат правилам и граничаьть с вандализмом. Я все откатываю.
jn0 (2017-03-28 16:49:13+00:00): ok.
Это я опробовал приложение https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=de.westnordost.streetcomplete

Кстати, не могли бы вы пояснить, что не так? Там можно только ответить на вопрос... Приложение генерирует некорректные правки?
literan (2017-03-29 13:20:36+00:00): ну хотя бы то, что вы в тег name везде пишете латиницей, хотя правите на территории России
jn0 (2017-03-29 17:51:24+00:00): Блин, а приложение - англоязычное...
С учётом языка, остальное - правильно оно делает?
jn0 (2017-03-29 17:52:17+00:00): Дело в том, что там не видно в какой тег оно пишет... Я опасался как раз непопадания в теги.
literan (2017-03-29 17:59:25+00:00): Нет, не все правильно. Вот парикмахерской (которую вы еще раньше прямо на тротуаре поместили) вы присваиваете имя "bus stop "Zhivopisnaya street"" http://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=47220405 - если вы хотите, можете посмотреть свои правки по порядку, просто подставляйте в achavi номера своих чейнджсетов.
jn0 (2017-03-29 18:04:28+00:00): Мда... И парикмахерскую - тоже я?
Ясно, приложение - нафиг.
Ибо там совершенно непонятно, что именуем.

А как найти свои ченжсеты?
У меня так сразу не вышло...
literan (2017-03-29 18:07:24+00:00): Ну вот прямо здесь, на этой страничке на свой ник нажмите - выйдете к себе в профиль. Там - на "Правки".
jn0 (2017-03-29 19:14:03+00:00): Нашёл!
Davide_sd (2017-03-28 11:50:00+00:00): I'm sure you have read the documentation about service=driveway (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway) where it's stated that such a way is to be used with access=* tag appropriately.

It is my understanding that it is impossible to say if a road have access private, permissive, etc.., by looking at satellite images. Thus, you should avoid changing tags from highway=residential to highway=service + service=driveway. Please stop doing this. 

You obviously have no idea about the access=* tag. Please, please, read the documentation first!!!! Please.

This kind of edits should be performed only by residents of the specific roads. Clearly, you are not living there so you have no idea what you are changing. Stop this sabotage action.
Davide_sd (2017-03-28 11:51:14+00:00): Please, DO NOT USE Google Map or other map services to bring data into OpenStreetMap, you are violating their term of service and there is absolutely no proof that what you are mapping is correct. SP11, SP1 indicates the the road network, not the name. Clearly you added this after looking at other map services. STOP DOING THAT!
trigpoint (2017-03-28 07:46:16+00:00): Hi, is this name correct?
Creek is an American word, and not used in terms of UK geography.
sc3005 (2017-03-28 07:59:23+00:00): Yep it's the correct name. http://www.scottishpower.com/pages/damhead_creek_power_station.aspx
trigpoint (2017-03-28 08:04:54+00:00): Thank you, was just checking as it looked an odd name in the UK.
Cheers Phil
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
eggie (2017-03-28 10:05:04+00:00):  "Welkom op OSM”

Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/help 
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
Klik op de link om te antwoorden.
eggie (2017-03-28 10:09:21+00:00): Wanneer de wegen opengesteld zijn moet nog wel construction=residential eraf ...anders routeert het niet.
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
Davide_sd (2017-03-28 11:45:59+00:00): I'm sure you have read the documentation about service=driveway (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:service%3Ddriveway) where it's stated that such a way is to be used with access=* tag appropriately.

It is my understanding that it is impossible to say if a road have access private, permissive, etc.., by looking at satellite images. Thus, you should avoid changing tags from highway=residential to highway=service + service=driveway. Please stop doing this. 

You obviously have no idea about the access=* tag. Please, please, read the documentation first!!!! Please.

This kind of edits should be performed only by residents of the specific roads. Clearly, you are not living there so you have no idea what you are changing. Stop this sabotage action.
springtrapony (2017-04-11 13:02:11+00:00): Вы выровняли объекты по bing, когда многие из них были выровнены лично по gps-трекам. Почитайте, пожалуйста, советы новичкам в Википедии osm
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-03-29 16:30:47+00:00): Hi,

I have been watching editing activity in Batangas City, but only this time I need to ask about your edits. Is this part of a mapping project led by the City Government of Batangas using OpenStreetMap? Are you local to the barangays where you map? Or, are you mapping those POI's as a city government employee?

Thanks,
mavl (2017-10-08 06:41:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52721923 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47219776].
agnostico (2017-03-28 09:35:40+00:00): Hello,
The correct name here is "Via Magherino" without the "- SP11"
There's no evidence that the road is a part of the SP11 network.
Please correct accordingly.
Davide_sd (2017-03-28 10:28:36+00:00): Please, DO NOT USE Google Map or other map services to bring data into OpenStreetMap, you are violating their term of service and there is absolutely no proof that what you are mapping is correct.

SP11 indicates the the road network, not the name. Clearly you added this after looking at other map services.

STOP DOING THAT!
eggie (2017-03-28 10:14:38+00:00): Eigenlijk zal de functie er nog bij moeten amenity=??? Anders doet die naam ook niets op de kaart.
Zie wiki.. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Kaarteigenschappen#Wegen
agnostico (2017-03-28 09:33:57+00:00): Hello,
as stated in the other changeset, the correct name here is "Via Trecenta" and not "Via Trecenta - SP11".
There's no evidence that the road is a part of the SP11 network.
Please correct accordingly.
Davide_sd (2017-03-28 10:29:03+00:00): Please, DO NOT USE Google Map or other map services to bring data into OpenStreetMap, you are violating their term of service and there is absolutely no proof that what you are mapping is correct.

SP11 indicates the the road network, not the name. Clearly you added this after looking at other map services.

STOP DOING THAT!
agnostico (2017-03-28 09:32:44+00:00): Hello,
The correct name here is "Via Trecenta" and not "Via Trecenta - SP11".
There's no evidence that the road is a part of the SP11 network.
Please correct accordingly.
Davide_sd (2017-03-28 09:54:03+00:00): Please, DO NOT USE Google Map or other map services to bring data into OpenStreetMap, you are violating their term of service and there is absolutely no proof that what you are mapping is correct.

SP11 indicates the the road network, not the name. Clearly you added this after looking at other map services.

STOP DOING THAT!
woodpeck (2017-03-28 21:39:23+00:00): You claim to have used Bing imagery for this changeset, but Bing imagery in this area is so cloudy that the island shape cannot be discerned, so the source specification must have been a mistake. Can you clarify your source? Have you made this edit as part of a MapRoulette task, and if yes, have you been instructed by anyone to do this?