piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
urichterde (2021-12-19 10:59:35+00:00): Alte Adresse:
Charlottenstr. 2 ; 15537 Grünheide

Neue Adresse:
Hans-Thoma Str. 6 ;  76307 Karlsbad
urichterde (2021-12-19 11:10:17+00:00): Neue Position:  
48.9110726471912, 8.502938061129118
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
user_8101879 (2022-01-26 13:06:55+00:00): Hi,

I think members/type have been removed because this relation was not a multipolygon but a site and the one who did it didn't know this kind of relation.
I fix the relation.
Best regards.
Aleks-Berlin (2022-01-26 15:22:48+00:00): Thanks.
ququruzka (2021-12-26 18:57:03+00:00): добрий день.
вже не вперше помічаю, що ви займаєтесь перейменуваннями вулиць на невідому мені мову.
Треба зазначити, що на усій території України діють правила нанесення вулиць, бульварів, провулків, проїздів, тощо виключно державною мовою. в разі недотримання цих правил, ваші зміни будуть відкочені без зазначення причини.
дякую за розуміння.
ivanbranco (2021-12-06 15:47:55+00:00): Hi Danielhiii,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006441260/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/442959882/history

I think you added the name as a tag in the first element by mistake. Also wouldn't be better to keep just one element tagged as:

name=Duckling Island
place=islet
natural=scrub

?
DD1GJ (2022-06-14 08:45:35+00:00): Hallo komoot,

was ist auf den Fotos zu sehen? Eine aktuelle Ansicht ist (bis mindestens Ende 2022) hier zu sehen:

https://hidrive.ionos.com/share/wzvzbn1y00

Es ist wohl ein Privatgelände, aber es ist nur Zeichen 251 (Verbot für Kraftwagen) ausgeschildert, aber keinerlei Verbot für Fußgänger oder Radfahrer. Außerdem ist auf einem von amtlicher Seite aufgestellten Schild zum örtlichen FFH-Gebiet auf der Luftbildübersicht der Rethsollskamp als Radweg eingetragen.

Es scheint, dass der Wunsch des Anwohners nicht mit der rechtlichen Lage übereinstimmt.
Access Claims (komoot) (2022-06-15 05:33:34+00:00): Vielen Dank für deine Nachfrage und die Fotos. Wir wurden für die Bearbeitungen in diesem Gebiet von einem Anwohner sowie dem Landrat kontaktiert. Auf den Fotos, welche wir erhalten haben, war beim Schild für die Schrittgeschwindigkeit zusätzlich der Hinweis angebracht "STOP - Fahrräder nur für Anlieger", auf welchem die anschliessende Bearbeitung auf OpenStreetMap zu Grunde liegt. Sollte sich die Situation vor Ort verändert haben oder das Schild nicht mehr vorhanden sein, wären wir dir dankbar, wenn du die Änderung entsprechend vornimmst.
GinaroZ (2021-11-26 19:47:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM and thanks for the edit, looks good. :)
If you know the surface of these paths it might be worth adding them.
SHARCRASH (2021-11-26 12:49:41+00:00): Previous attempt to upload got an error, i noticed the undo list was over so i assumed the upload has been done, but apparently it didn't. Further edits: extended field, merged equal elements,
SHARCRASH (2021-11-26 12:50:14+00:00): + tags corrected
YjM (2021-12-06 17:58:17+00:00): Dobrý den/ahoj,

děkujeme za úpravy autobusových zastávek. Zálivy pro autobusy se ale v OSM nikdy neznačí samostatnou cestou, pokud jsou součástí silnice (nejsou samostanou komunikací oddělenou např. chodníkem). Namísto toho se používá značka "bus_bay" na hlavní cestě. Podrobně viz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bus_bay .

Děkuji
 YjM
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:48:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
VRT OSM (2021-11-26 13:17:02+00:00): Bron https://dwo.rdw.nl/ConsultRestrictions/ViewRestrictions
Jakka (2021-11-27 08:40:21+00:00): you do not need to add a second layer like -1 if every crossing highway above already has layer 1 ;)
sander79 (2021-11-26 16:58:22+00:00): hoi, is dit correct? nu is deze straat niet meer routeerbaar voor motorvoertuigen vanwege de bollard
defluyter (2021-11-26 17:05:13+00:00): Ha sander79, scherp geconstateerd. Tussen de klappalen kan net een auto van maximaal 2.2m breed doorheen (in de straat ligt ook een stoeptegel met de tekst 2.2m). Zal ik motor_vehicle=yes toevoegen en width=2.2 toevoegen aan de bollard?
defluyter (2021-11-26 17:10:09+00:00): Heb het zo opgelost: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114271454
YjM (2021-12-06 18:00:28+00:00): Dobrý den/ahoj,

děkujeme za úpravy cest v Domažlicích! Jedno ze základních pravidel při editaci cest v OSM je, že cesty stejného druhu (chodník, silnice, apod.) se nikdy nekreslí přes sebe. Namísto toho prosím vždy napojte nově nakreslený kus cesty do již existující sítě cest.

Děkuji!
 YjM
YjM (2021-12-06 18:06:32+00:00): P.S. Cesty (silnice, chodníky, cyklostezky apod.) prosím nepřipojujte na budovy, zdi, trávníky apod. objekty, a to ani pokud se ve skutečnosti dotýkají. Jedinou výjimkou je, pokud cesta prochází budovou/zdí, pak na jejich průsečíku má být právě jeden bod.

Děkuji!
felipeeugenio (2021-11-26 17:53:27+00:00): Hola

Con la letra Q se pueden cuadrar las estructuras
Saludos
mpele (2021-12-23 12:55:10+00:00): Мораш да будеш мало пажљивији када радиш аутоматско пресловљавање. Обрати пљжњу на римске бројеве - нпр. Краљ Петра И Карађорђевића, 
Краља Алфонса XИИИ ...
eggie (2021-11-26 14:12:32+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback.. In de rendering zal een heg met area-yes niet opvullen. Het zij zo.
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
KireStreve (2023-09-25 13:58:46+00:00): Beste Eggie, bedankt voor je feedback. 
Heb een nieuw aanpassingen gedaan had het natuurlijk gebied verwijderd wat juist er bij moest. Heb dat nu weer toegevoegd.

Zal ook de links van je privebericht doornemen :)

MVG

KireStreve
dieterdreist (2021-11-30 09:21:46+00:00): Ciao Fedc, le "light_rail" sono ferrovie "normali", in questo caso, considerando la frequenza delle fermate e i mezzi utilizzati esempio http://www.ferroviaromanord.altervista.org/DSCN0335.jpg
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-BMb5bkjzapw/Xlww3VKMEfI/AAAAAAAA2VM/n5cqAfENmNUIpCUunl8nPUQjyEI-YIg0wCLcBGAsYHQ/s1600/roma%2Bviterbo_marchio.JPG
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gFidqt_X2i0/maxresdefault.jpg
direi che light rail è giusto.
Il tuo edit tra altro è stato parziale perché tutte le fermate sono rimaste station=light_rail.
Se sei d'accordo, rimetterei light rail per questa linea.

Ciao,
Martin
dieterdreist (2021-12-10 15:33:28+00:00): Non avendo più avuto riscontro procedo come spiegato e la metto a light rail. 

Ciao,
Martin
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:54:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
BCNorwich (2021-11-27 08:58:19+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

You placed your way Brays Hey on top of an existing highway making duplication of highways, this messes with routing.

It's OSM practice that when something needs correcting/amending, (like here), that the existing feature is amended. Thus I've removed your duplication and added your amending tags to the existing way.

Need any help please just ask.
Regards Bernard.
RicoElectrico (2021-11-26 18:26:20+00:00): Cześć,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6547813372/history

Ten punkt chyba powinien być skasowany całkowicie? Nie tylko nazwa i godziny otwarcia. W samouczku edytora jest opis jak kasować obiekty. Polecam przejść :)
letihu (2022-04-14 19:14:25+00:00): Ein Tor
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9285891715/history
mitten im Gebäude?
Der Weg führt auch einfach dadurch.
4004 (2021-11-28 00:05:30+00:00): здравствуйте, спасибо за правку.
пожалуйста учтите, что в осм назначение обьекта записывается комбинациями тегов (вот например скважины https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:natural%3Dspring)
а в name- собственно только имя.
4004 (2021-11-28 00:07:16+00:00): скорее даже https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:man_made%3Dwater_well
mpaulm (2021-12-03 10:04:12+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо за рекомендации.
piterwrc (2021-11-29 07:13:16+00:00): Na pewno? W zeszlym tygodniu jeszcze byl przejazd do DTS, no i da sie zjechac na sam parking od Zabrzanskiej.
szalona_entropia (2021-11-29 09:25:00+00:00): Podobno wstawili słupki blokujące przejazd, ale nie wiem gdzie dokładnie
piterwrc (2021-11-29 12:28:16+00:00): Faktycznie wstawili :) podzielili parking na pol, naniose zmiany
c0nsumer (2023-01-19 15:36:12+00:00): Hey there -- wanted to make a note about this changeset. The trails here at DTE shouldn't be designated as cycleway. These are paths through the woods that allow bicycles (along with other uses) which are different from the documented dedicated cycleway purpose.

Additionally, by designating them as cycleway you'll cause routing software, which thinks cycleways are good for all kinds of bicycles, to route people down these trails. This isn't good, as there's a number of technical features and such that are not appropriate for commuters.
DaveF (2022-07-26 15:00:56+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1006472848

Is this a hole?
The course's website don't list it.
etgg (2022-07-26 15:51:06+00:00): Good point, I have removed / and labelled the holes as per their website.
philippec (2022-03-06 17:44:55+00:00): Kortrijk Howest AED, ik maak er indoor van
ALn_668 (2021-12-05 02:28:23+00:00): Ciao, la linea in realtà *non* è sospesa: le tratte terminali Lido Centro - C. Colombo ed EUR Magliana - Porta S. Paolo sono interrotte nei soli giorni feriali, sabato escluso, non a causa della chiusura della linea ma per mancanza di materiale rotabile (si concentra quindi il servizio ferroviario nella tratta centrale per garantire una frequenza accettabile per il servizio). Nei giorni festivi, invece, la linea è attiva sul percorso completo Porta S. Paolo - C. Colombo, in quanto il ridotto numero di corse rende il materiale rotabile sufficiente a coprire il servizio sull'intera linea. I tag precedenti andrebbero quindi ripristinati.
fedc (2021-12-09 08:46:52+00:00): Non sapevo che nei festivi la linea fosse in servizio. Il mio errore va quindi corretto.
ALn_668 (2022-04-19 19:08:21+00:00): Quando vuoi sei libero di farlo :)

(Solo per dovere di cronaca: la linea è ora in esercizio tutti i giorni sull'intero percorso)
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-14 18:37:22+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/389277757/history has amenity = water that was added in this edit
amenity=water? What is this?

If it is place with drinking water amenity=drinking_water is typically
used.

man_made=water_tap may be added if it is a water tap.

man_made=water_tap with drinking_water=no is typically used to indicate
tap without drinking water

see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=water
4004 (2021-11-28 00:27:15+00:00): хозяйственный проезд, это я так понимаю совсем не название улицы.
mpaulm (2021-12-03 10:00:51+00:00): Хозяйственный проезд, в данном случае, находится между 2-х улиц и не имеет другого названия. Как корректно его обозначить?
4004 (2021-12-03 13:48:02+00:00): ну вот можете посмотреть, как я обозначил.
хозяйственный проезд - разновидность подьездной дороги https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway%3Dservice , я выбрал alley https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:service%3Dalley, но тут вы лучше определите по тому, что видели
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:47:35+00:00): Please be aware that local language in Bolivia is SPANISH, so any tag name= needs to be in spanish, if you will use any foreign language them use name:en= for english, name:de= for german, etc.. Also Paths should be connected between them or with roads, and buildings could not be overlapped. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 20:01:32+00:00): If you really wants to help, I suggest you use the Cellphone applications Mapillary and/or Kartaview, and record all the Village, so the data extracted from the pictures, could be used for a detailled mapping of all the area. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:47:16+00:00): Please be aware that local language in Bolivia is SPANISH, so any tag name= needs to be in spanish, if you will use any foreign language them use name:en= for english, name:de= for german, etc.. Also Paths should be connected between them or with roads, and buildings could not be overlapped. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 20:01:19+00:00): If you really wants to help, I suggest you use the Cellphone applications Mapillary and/or Kartaview, and record all the Village, so the data extracted from the pictures, could be used for a detailled mapping of all the area. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:47:01+00:00): Please be aware that local language in Bolivia is SPANISH, so any tag name= needs to be in spanish, if you will use any foreign language them use name:en= for english, name:de= for german, etc.. Also Paths should be connected between them or with roads, and buildings could not be overlapped. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 20:01:05+00:00): If you really wants to help, I suggest you use the Cellphone applications Mapillary and/or Kartaview, and record all the Village, so the data extracted from the pictures, could be used for a detailled mapping of all the area. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:46:45+00:00): Please be aware that local language in Bolivia is SPANISH, so any tag name= needs to be in spanish, if you will use any foreign language them use name:en= for english, name:de= for german, etc.. Also Paths should be connected between them or with roads, and buildings could not be overlapped. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 20:00:46+00:00): If you really wants to help, I suggest you use the Cellphone applications Mapillary and/or Kartaview, and record all the Village, so the data extracted from the pictures, could be used for a detailled mapping of all the area. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:46:33+00:00): Please be aware that local language in Bolivia is SPANISH, so any tag name= needs to be in spanish, if you will use any foreign language them use name:en= for english, name:de= for german, etc.. Also Paths should be connected between them or with roads, and buildings could not be overlapped. Thanks
nonameforme (2021-12-24 11:57:44+00:00): а зачем у этой точки https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8716639987 добавил повторяющийся номер телефона?
pbnoxious (2024-12-05 16:25:56+00:00): Hi,
gibts einen speziellen Grund, dass du "width:lanes:forward" und "width:lanes:backward" benutzt und nicht einfach "width:lanes"?
Ich weiß der Changeset ist schon etwas älter, aber ich bin gerade über das tagging gestolpert und hab mich gefragt  ob es dadurch irgendeinen Vorteil gibt, vielleicht kannst du mir da weiterhelfen.

Grüße
pbnoxious
Supaplex030 (2024-12-05 19:21:22+00:00): Hallo pbnoxious, sehr schöne Frage, da es in diesem Bereich noch nicht sehr viel Dokumentation gibt und daher auch keinen eindeutigen Diskurs/eindeutige Empfehlungen.

Nach meinem Verständnis verhält sich "width" bzw. "width:lanes" hier aber sehr ähnlich zu anderen Tags wie "turn" bzw. "turn:lanes" (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:*:lanes), wo es ebenfalls üblich ist, die fahrtrichtungsbezogenen Angaben einer eindeutigen Fahrtrichtung zuzuordnen. Das hat den Vorteil, dass es keinerlei Interpretationsspielraum mehr gibt, welche Angabe sich auf welche Spur bezieht. Bei Zweirichtungsfahrbahnen läge es zwar nahe, die erste Angabe auf die – in Linienrichtung gesehen – äußerste/linkeste Spur zu beziehen, da das jedoch in Ländern mit Rechtsverkehr eine Spur ist, deren Verkehr entgegen der Linienrichtung verläuft, kann die Interpretation in manchen Fällen jedoch schwierig werden. Ein überspitztes Beispiel: Man könnte die Schreibweise um die ":start" und ":end"-Suffixe erweitern – z.B. "width:lanes:start=4.5|3" + "width:lanes:end=3|3" – und nun stellt sich die Frage, ob man "start" und "end" in Linien- oder in Fahrtrichtung gesehen interpretieren sollte.

Ich denke, dass diese klarere/eindeutige Interpretierbarkeit der Grund ist, warum sich im lanes-Kontext daher die forward- und backward-Schreibweisen durchgesetzt haben. Bei "turn:lanes" ist dies so dokumentiert (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:turn#Indicated_turns_by_direction_and_lane) und auch für "width:lanes" scheint mir das so üblich zu sein, auch wenn undokumentiert: Laut TagInfo wird "width:lanes" derzeit 8.600 mal verwendet, 91% davon in Kombination mit "oneway" (ich gehe davon aus, fast immer "oneway=yes" – dann ist "backward" oder "forward" ja nicht nötig). "width:lanes:forward/backward" gibt es jeweils ca. 3.900 mal, also im Vergleich auch recht häufig.

lg, Alex
pbnoxious (2024-12-06 07:27:26+00:00): Hi, danke für die rasche Antwort und deine Ausführungen. Dann bin ich etwas schlauer (und ergänze das mal im Wiki-Artikel der gestern erstellt wurde https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:width:lanes:forward ).

Finds persönlich nicht klarer zu interpretieren, ist halt immer von links nach rechts in Richtung des entsprechenden ways und bei anderen Tags (z.B. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bus:lanes ) ist es von der Verteilung der Benutzung aktuell andersrum.
Aber muss man wohl akzeptieren, dass es hier beides nebeneinander gibt.

Grüße
pbnoxious
pbnoxious (2024-12-06 11:10:44+00:00): Followup: hab mittlerweile festgestellt, dass das ursprüngliche "lanes-Proposal"  ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposal:Lanes_General_Extension ) das genauso für "Zweirichtungswege" empfielt, es ist also nur im Wiki nicht wirklich gut dokumentiert.
gscscnd (2021-11-26 18:10:44+00:00): Zostało construction=minor. To już koniec remontu?
Olga | Yanosik (2021-11-27 15:06:22+00:00): ruch wygląda na normalny, usunęłam niepotrzebny tag.
Lee Carré (2021-11-28 11:16:04+00:00): Correction: Union Street, not Union Road.
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:45:55+00:00): Please be aware that local language in Bolivia is SPANISH, so any tag name= needs to be in spanish, if you will use any foreign language them use name:en= for english, name:de= for german, etc.. Also Paths should be connected between them or with roads, and buildings could not be overlapped. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 20:00:12+00:00): If you really wants to help, I suggest you use the Cellphone applications Mapillary and/or Kartaview, and record all the Village, so the data extracted from the pictures, could be used for a detailled mapping of all the area. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:45:40+00:00): Please be aware that local language in Bolivia is SPANISH, so any tag name= needs to be in spanish, if you will use any foreign language them use name:en= for english, name:de= for german, etc.. Also Paths should be connected between them or with roads, and buildings could not be overlapped. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:59:58+00:00): If you really wants to help, I suggest you use the Cellphone applications Mapillary and/or Kartaview, and record all the Village, so the data extracted from the pictures, could be used for a detailled mapping of all the area. Thanks
Dimacn (2021-11-26 16:58:15+00:00): Скажите зачем вы сокращаете названия остановок? Прошу вернуть полные названия.
E de Wit (2021-11-26 16:45:25+00:00): Hi,

Waarschijnlijk moeilijk te zien op de 25cm Ortho beelden, maar tussen de fietspaden en de weg is hier wel degelijk een tussenstuk waar men kan wachten.

-E de Wit
JeroenHoek (2021-11-26 19:00:15+00:00): Klopt, maar deze oversteekplaats is ingetekend als drie footway=crossing met daar tussen andere stukjes (hier footway=traffic_island, maar dat is niet vereist, als de footway=crossing maar onderbroken is).

Het lijkt dus wat vreemd, maar het zijn drie 'crossings' die elk geen 'island' hebben (wel tussen de crossings in). Als het als één footway=crossing was ingetekend was crossing:island=no fout geweest, maar hier klopt het.

Voor data consumers is het handig om te weten of een oversteekplaats erg lang is, en of daar gelegenheid tot wachten is. Je zou kunnen denken aan een navigatietool die rekening houdt met mensen die slecht ter been zijn en lange oversteekplaatsen willen vermijden. Als je de footway=crossing los intekent weet de data consumer exact hoe lang ze zijn. Wanneer dat niet mogelijk is (door lage resolutiebeelden bijvoorbeeld) kan crossing:island=* aangeven of de hele crossing ook onderbroken wordt, maar je weet dan niet of dat een beetje halverwege is of niet, of hoe vaak.
E de Wit (2021-11-26 19:31:02+00:00): Ah kijk, die heb ik niet gezien. Dan kan mijn voorgaande bericht worden vergeten.
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:45:13+00:00): Please be aware that local language in Bolivia is SPANISH, so any tag name= needs to be in spanish, if you will use any foreign language them use name:en= for english, name:de= for german, etc.. Also Paths should be connected between them or with roads, and buildings could not be overlapped. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:59:45+00:00): If you really wants to help, I suggest you use the Cellphone applications Mapillary and/or Kartaview, and record all the Village, so the data extracted from the pictures, could be used for a detailled mapping of all the area. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:44:16+00:00): Please be aware that local language in Bolivia is SPANISH, so any tag name= needs to be in spanish, if you will use any foreign language them use name:en= for english, name:de= for german, etc.. Also Paths should be connected between them of with roads, and buildings could not be overlapped. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:59:32+00:00): If you really wants to help, I suggest you use the Cellphone applications Mapillary and/or Kartaview, and record all the Village, so the data extracted from the pictures, could be used for a detailled mapping of all the area. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:43:57+00:00): Please be aware that local language in Bolivia is SPANISH, so any tag name= needs to be in spanish, if you will use any foreign language them use name:en= for english, name:de= for german, etc.. Also Paths should be connected between them of with roads, and buildings could not be overlapped. Thanks
JJIglesias (2021-11-26 19:59:14+00:00): If you really wants to help, I suggest you use the Cellphone applications Mapillary and/or Kartaview, and record all the Village, so the data extracted from the pictures, could be used for a detailled mapping of all the area. Thanks
eggie (2021-11-26 18:49:24+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback:  Over de  'hierarchy'  is echt wel nagedacht. Het lijkt me niet verstandig hier als stratende mapper wijzigingen aan te brengen. 
Het is lastig te controleren wat je hebt gedaan.
Welke Routingapp kan Vlissingen niet vinden?

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-11-26 18:51:54+00:00): Administratieve grenzen liggen vast en worden door specialisten binnen OSM onderhouden.
Ik draai je changeset even terug.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-26 18:55:16+00:00): Terugdraaien van de changeset geeft nu al een conflict. 
Ik stuur je mutatie even door naar één van de specialisten.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-11-27 07:12:56+00:00): Je actie is door een medemapper al weer gecorrigeerd..
Er is ook nog een place node. Wellicht ben je daar mee in de war?
Mvg
Eggie