piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
FUZZY_42 (2021-12-08 08:58:23+00:00): Ну если не угадал и её ныне не существует, то можно откатить эту правку.
eggie (2021-10-24 21:03:50+00:00): Review requested...
Please.. Don't touch the coastline with editor iD. .
Your PDOK aerial image is outdated anyway.
There are constructionworks in progress at the Afsluitdijk.
The situation is changing. 
You are familiar with the present situation at Den Oever? 
Greetz,
eggie
Jørn-osm (2021-10-24 21:45:29+00:00): Har kommunen fået besked?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/autoAWS
Kif (2021-10-25 07:31:09+00:00): Ikke endnu, men det får de inden for kort tid.
Kif (2021-10-27 09:10:31+00:00): Så har kommunen rettet adresserne i DAR, jeg får AWS ignore tags fjernet igen
user_10241830 (2021-10-24 14:45:54+00:00): Hallo,

wurde dieser mechanische Edit irgendwo diskutiert?

building=row_house sollte wahrscheinlich building=terrace sein (beides bedeutet das gleiche - "row house" ist amerikanisches Englisch, "terrace" ist britisches Englisch). Diese Änderung sollte aber keinesfalls automatisiert vorgenommen werden, sondern nur nach Vor-Ort-Prüfung, ob dieses Tag auch zutrifft.
Radbubi (2021-10-24 16:07:59+00:00): Hallo,
wie bereits beschrieben existiert building=row_house nicht. Es gab ein paar vereinzelte Flecken damit (Karlsruhe, Essen, Kiel, Rostock, Stuttgart und Stavanger [Norwegen]). Das war es. Weltweit! Es gibt sie nicht mal Amerika (kann man per Overpass prüfen). Daher ging die Änderung auch manuell schnell vonstatten.
Mit was man ersetzt, da gibt es viele Möglichkeiten. building=apartments passt tw. auch. Ich habe mich an umliegenden, vergleichbaren Häusern orientiert und im Zweifelsfall das eher allgemeine building=house verwendet (das kann auch für Reihenhäuser verwendet werden). Gerne können die Gebäude entsprechend angepasst werden, building=row_house war jedoch die denkbar schlechteste Lösung.
Gruß
ivanbranco (2021-12-01 10:06:49+00:00): Hi Liuxunyu,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9197397504

place=museum is not a valid tag, you can use tourism=museum instead :)
b-unicycling (2022-08-26 10:59:13+00:00): Temple Street Street?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-24 19:32:43+00:00): boa noite, pode explicar esta edição se faz favor.
Hugoren Martinako (2021-10-25 10:13:02+00:00): Bom dia, não é muito importante mas revejando o cruzamento vi que era complicado.
Ontem, encontrei que esse segmento não era necessario: a praceta é um área e os roteadores não atravessam as áreas.
Além disso, o segmento também não existe: ou bem é un footway (paralelo à estrada toda) ou a própria praceta chega atè à estrada; mas criar um highway=pedestrian só para isso não é correto.
Não pensa assim?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-25 10:20:27+00:00): Incorreto, sem este segmento não é possível calcular rotas e a praceta fica uma ilha. Para além de que no OpenStreetMap não se deve eliminar dados do mapa, conforme as Boas Práticas que podem ser consultadas na wiki. A edição foi revertida
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-25 10:24:41+00:00): e podes verificar que a rota é calculada até à praceta devido à aquela via pedonal, sem a mesma deixa de ser "possível" chegar à Praceta 24 de Junho https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=32.72108%2C-17.17831%3B32.72094%2C-17.17848
w
Hugoren Martinako (2021-10-25 10:53:31+00:00): O que eu digo é que não ta bem criar algo que não existe. Olha as praças do povo e do esmeraldo no funchal. As duas têm footway passando por eles: isso é correto. Desta maneira os roteadores chegam, atravessam, etc... mas agora há um elemento falso somente para chegar lá.
Se você quer, depois de tarde, faço as calçadas para no ter o elemento falso.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-25 11:11:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsquare#Gallery
Hugoren Martinako (2021-10-25 14:46:56+00:00): Isto era o que dizia: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112951118
A calçada da rua D. Manuel é quem atravessa (para poder chegar) a área da praceta. Mas não ter um elemento pedestre (além que não existe) só para que as rotas cheguem
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-25 15:16:50+00:00): cá está o elemento que não existe, em rampa e escada. logo liga à praceta
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-25 15:16:55+00:00): https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=173637947979385
Hugoren Martinako (2021-10-25 16:16:29+00:00): Sim, ou as duas escadas ou a calçada. O que não existe era a rua pedestrian, que eu tirei ontem.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2021-10-25 16:25:10+00:00): Pois, mas aí edita e não apaga. Não se deve apagar elementos do mapa, que foi o que você fez.
SpaLeo (2022-12-11 12:53:05+00:00): Wie kommst du auf access private und destination für die Wege im Johannesstift?
Die Beschilderung gibt das nicht her. Wenn überhaupt Accesswerte an die Wege dann permissive.
StefanHRT (2022-12-11 13:12:55+00:00): Zeichen 250 mit Anliegerverkehr frei ist nicht permissive ;)
SpaLeo (2022-12-11 13:18:51+00:00): Das gilt aber nur für Fahrzeuge, wenn dann also vehicle=destination, aber nicht access=destination.
StefanHRT (2022-12-11 13:46:54+00:00): Ja gut mittlerweile ist mir das mit dem vehicle auch bewusster, aber schau mal wann ich das gemacht hatte ;) Inwiefern das Gelände für Fußgänger freigegeben ist, wissen nur die Eigentümer, da würde bei foot permissive passen
Mammi71 (2022-01-12 22:15:40+00:00): Hallo famosm, Du hast in diesem Changeset das natural=coastline von den Borner und Neuendorfer Bülten entfernt. Warum? Absicht oder Fehler?
DaveF (2021-10-26 12:53:55+00:00): Hi
Could you clarify why you've 'disused' these railways stations?
Isn't the line still open?
https://www.facebook.com/Barry-Tourist-Railway-196540117115590/
ZenPhil (2021-10-26 14:44:24+00:00): Hi DaveF, apologies I've incorrectly tagged these and now amended. Thanks.
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
Capello13 (2021-10-28 17:04:52+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans l'aventure Openstreetmap !

Juste un commentaire sur le chemin créé, je conseillerais de le faire joindre les rues adjacentes (Rue de Beaufort et la voie de parking) afin que les calculateurs d'itinéraires puissent le prendre en compte dans leur calculs.

Bonnes prochaines contributions ;)
Gregory UKR (2021-10-24 20:59:54+00:00): Please don't use the actual map for testing. Reverted in 112921615
Kautilya3 (2021-10-24 13:52:16+00:00): Exchanged the English names for Rezang La and Rechin La, which unfortunately differs from the Chinese nomenclature.
NM$L (2021-10-27 17:57:44+00:00): Hello Kautilya3,
Thank you for adding Chinese pinyin to the current or new Rechin La but you added wrongly. The pinyin of the Chinese name,  热藏山口, is Rèzàng Shānkǒu rather than Rècáng Shānkǒu. Please note that sometimes a Chinese character could have two or more pronounces and don't just follow the pinyin that translators give. Please fix it. Thanks!
Dimacn (2021-10-24 15:30:44+00:00): В тег name пишем только названия (официальные имена собственные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Не должно быть таких описательных названий как "там очень плохо делают фото" и "хз как называется" и "бывший Военкомат" Пожалуйста удалите эти названия.
mavl (2021-10-25 14:32:39+00:00): Здравствуйте, vika223. Ещё вы испортили здание, в котором находится автомагазин, и попытались превратить карту в книгу отзывов. Отзывы не нужны.
itineris (2023-12-17 08:19:32+00:00): Szia!

A Graphisoft parkba felszórt ötezer cégnek nem kellene az addr:*-jait is kitölteni az őket tartalmazó épületből?

Üdv:
Ákos
vasony (2023-12-18 21:07:08+00:00): De, ki kellene.
SekeRob (2021-10-24 15:55:54+00:00): Hi,

The correct spelling per www is Lago Dell'Orso (bear's den or something) and on the hiking calendar.
https://www.giornaledimontesilvano.com/4490-abruzzo-trekking-lago-dell-orso-verso-un-paradiso-terrestre

cheers
Aranc (2021-10-24 16:13:37+00:00): Fixed, thanks.
Lee Carré (2021-10-24 18:04:07+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
Lee Carré (2021-10-24 18:04:31+00:00): Much smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
ivanbranco (2021-11-01 07:40:34+00:00): Ciao Marco,

il POI così come è non ha tag che lo descrivano. Ho visto il sito e penso che office=energy_supplier vada bene e ho modificato di conseguenza.
Marcociara (2021-11-01 07:49:55+00:00): Ottimo, grazie per l'aggiunta.
Dimacn (2021-10-24 15:36:23+00:00): Вы вандально удалили дом по улица Чернышевского 2А к7 . Ваша правка будет отменена.
mavl (2021-10-25 14:06:16+00:00): Здравствуйте, все. Что-то не видно, что этот пакет правок отменён. Например, здание не восстановлено.
mavl (2021-10-25 14:10:06+00:00): Восстановил здание.
vulasala (2021-10-25 06:13:40+00:00): Hi  lqh_613,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 996075113 from unclassified to service in order to fix classification gap.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112908749
vulasala (2021-10-25 06:05:52+00:00): Hi 	lqh_613,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 996075277 from unclassified to service in order to fix classification gap.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112908802
vulasala (2021-10-25 06:07:43+00:00): Hi  lqh_613,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 996075202 from unclassified to service in order to fix classification gap.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112908802
vulasala (2021-10-25 05:57:23+00:00): Hi lqh_613,
Trust you are doing well. I have modified the classification of way 996077424 from unclassified to service, as the area is a amenity.
Thank you.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112909114
ivanbranco (2022-01-08 11:39:36+00:00): Hi Abilash,

place=kuturpadam is not a valid place value, could you check it out please?
ivanbranco (2022-04-26 16:06:40+00:00): Hi abilash ks,

what's the source of this pond? The imagery you used is Bing but the pond is not visibile in such imagery.
Sandal man (2021-10-28 10:06:53+00:00): Hola, heu eliminat intencionadament les etiquetes d'aquest edifici?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/655226527
Saludos Juan.
Pete Owens (2021-10-25 13:00:07+00:00): I just corrected the cycle access tag to yes when I noticed the road had disappeared from the cycle map along with the path leading to Burtonwood Road.
Falsernet (2021-10-26 13:46:02+00:00): Ok well let's leave this one be for now
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:18:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
archie (2021-10-24 15:46:02+00:00): förtydligande: avsedd var implicit default values, så som här beskrivs: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Sweden
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:25+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:17:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
Lejun (2021-10-24 19:42:29+00:00): Merci pour le travail ! C’eût été dans des zones plus accessibles (et avec plus de temps libre) je l’aurais fait volontiers mais c’était à la fois loin de mon logement (Chalezeule) et aurait nécessité d’exclusivement faire le trajet pour la note.
gscholz (2021-10-25 16:22:35+00:00): Hi XimenaCaballero,
this changeset has added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.47160&lat=-25.24074&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-01-04 07:27:51+00:00): As nobody cares about those errors and for convenience I have reverted this changeset now.
Guido
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
ToniE (2021-10-24 16:02:19+00:00): ,,, keine turn-restrictions, wenn ...
Lee Carré (2021-10-24 16:08:04+00:00): Having recently (2021-10-15, if I recall) surveyed the SE end of Broad Street, the temporary barriers have been removed and permanent-looking signage installed. So, this change appears to be for the long-term.
Lee Carré (2021-10-24 16:10:17+00:00): See also changeset #102280863.
Lee Carré (2021-11-18 13:23:32+00:00): See also discussion of http://www.osm.org/changeset/113918944 .
Lee Carré (2021-11-18 13:28:25+00:00): See http://www.osm.org/note/2939819 with attached photos (captured 2021-11-18).
Robert Whittaker (2021-11-05 13:06:31+00:00): Could you have another look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/401032045 ? The postcode isn't right for this location. (See https://osm.mathmos.net/addresses/pc-stats/B/B36/0/#0DD )

From a bit of searching online I think Summerfield Education Centre may not be occupying new buildings on this site: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/84658252 , which would fit with the postcode. But can this be verified?
confusedbuffalo (2021-11-05 18:50:47+00:00): Ah yes, I was just going off the edubase ref.
Looks like https://www.get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/Establishments/Establishment/Details/133531
and https://www.get-information-schools.service.gov.uk/Establishments/Establishment/Details/134534
are both at that new site.
Ofsted report history for Summerfield Education Centre indicate that it moved to this new location some time between 2015 and 2019.
confusedbuffalo (2021-11-08 19:55:34+00:00): I think I'll revert these changes and leave some notes then.
Dimacn (2021-10-24 17:16:56+00:00): "Качели и лавочки" и "площадка" это не парки отдыха которыми вы обозначили данные объекты. Пожалуйста удалите. К тому же, В тег name пишем только названия (официальные имена собственные) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name Не должно быть таких описательных названий как: "заброшен" "сносится" "качели". Свойства объектов указываются специальными тегами. Пожалуйста исправьте.
BCNorwich (2021-10-25 13:23:12+00:00): Hi, I repaired a self intersection of Way: 913204833
gscholz (2021-10-28 04:21:00+00:00): Hi XimenaCaballero,
this changeset has massively added errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.47220&lat=-25.24128&zoom=15&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

I am wondeering how this could happen as you are using JOSM and this edotor normaly shows warning or even error messages if you try to upload these errors.

There is also no comment for this changeset so no other user can understand what this is about. Can you please read about how to propperly add meaningfull comments:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Can you please fix your errors?
Kind Regards
Guido
gscholz (2022-01-02 06:43:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted now.
Guido
nevw (2021-10-24 21:36:51+00:00): Hi
you have deleted the building that Kia Motors occupied and put a node with your business listed in it's place. Was that a mistake or has it been demolished and another building replaced it?
E de Wit (2021-11-28 16:27:41+00:00): Ik zie dat je (terecht) de building=yes van de ondergrondse parkeerplaats af heb gehaald.

De gebouwcontouren van het winkelcentrum / appartementen heb ik nu ingetekend o.b.v. de omtrekgericht en de vogelvlucht beelden.

Changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114330143
smootheFiets (2021-11-29 00:09:15+00:00): 👍
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-03 12:16:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 130822479, 130823603, 130822659, 130821821, 130822156, 130821684, 130823808, 130823423, 130823995, 130823041, 130821981, 130818753, 130822310, 130822822, 130823241 where the changeset comment is: revert all edits by Designer1 because they often damaged existing non-golf infrastructure and individually reverting only the problematic edits would have been too much work
philippec (2021-10-24 19:45:00+00:00): Zandvliet sport aed, dat moet een nieuwe zijn.  Er is ook nieuw gebouwd.  Ik ben daar vroeger al 2 keer gaan zien.
philippec (2021-10-25 11:27:39+00:00): In september 2020 stond die nog binnen aan een bakstenen muur.
Ik moet normaalgezien deze week nog in Zandvliet zijn.  Ik hoop dat ik niet voor niets rij.
VincentVE (2021-10-25 18:46:24+00:00): Inderdaad, deze is vermoedelijk (ver-/ge?)plaatst met de bouw en ingebruikname van het jeugdlokaal 'Polderkot'. Toevallig opgemerkt in het snel voorbijrijden, maar toen niet in de mogelijkheid het te fotograferen. Ik probeer er zsm ook opnieuw langs te gaan als het u niet zou lukken.
VincentVE (2021-11-01 19:36:52+00:00): beelden: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1514796905543790
philippec (2021-11-01 19:45:04+00:00): Ik wilde net morgen na het werk gaan.
eggie (2021-10-24 17:26:08+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 



MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
map per (2021-10-28 08:25:38+00:00): Hallo Carto-Students,

amenity=parcingspace sollte nicht einzeln sondern innerhalb einers Parkplatzes (amenity=parking) verwendet werden. Siehe (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dparking_space)

Viele Grüße
map per
TheNet1996 (2021-10-25 07:25:36+00:00): Hallo JulianReAux,
soweit ich weiß, ist für dieses Projekt noch nicht mal das Planfeststellungsverfahren gestartet. Aus meiner Sicht macht es daher wenig Sinn, eine diskutierte Variante aus dem Jahr 2017 in OSM zu erfassen - und dazu noch highway=construction (Straße in Bau) zu verwenden. Hiervon ist das Projekt noch weit entfernt.
Das ist meine Meinung...
Viele Grüße
Mike
TheNet1996 (2022-02-05 09:34:03+00:00): Hallo JulianReAux,
Feedback von deiner Seite?
VG
Mike
eggie (2021-10-24 17:41:49+00:00): Dag Marcel..
Tip...  Wanneer je de linker alttoets gebruikt bij intekenen zullen je wegen niet overal aan de landuse vastplakken.
Probeer de vlakken (landuse)  los te houden van de wegen.

Hier je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112914753

MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-24 17:45:53+00:00): Er lopen ook egen dwars over de huizen. 
Neem de tijd om die wegen netjes in te tekenen. 
Ik heb wat vlakken losgemaakt van de wegen.

MVG
eggie
user_12500175 (2021-12-06 14:25:24+00:00): Hallo,
das ist ein bisserl früh die Osttangente einzutragen. 
Der Tag higway=construction wird für im Bau befindliche Straßen verwendet.  Zumidest die Planungen sollten abgeschlossen sein um etwas einzutragen Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway=constructionconstruction
gscholz (2021-10-31 08:26:32+00:00): Hi Marcos_Itba_Kaart,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Frutal" and "Itapagipe":

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-49.17045&lat=-19.97252&zoom=10

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=112914978

Can you please fix this?

Can you also please the the wiki about how to add meaningfull changeset comments?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-11-01 20:21:40+00:00): Hi Guido (gscholz),

I fixed the error generated by the changeset on the boundaries between Itapagipe and Iturama.

I am always available.

Greetings,

Marcos
EP_Repair (2021-12-20 17:08:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 115174640 where the changeset comment is: reverting damages to highway classifications by Djam (ref Ticket#2021120110000024). Djam was contacted and asked to provide some reasoning for making changes to highways but no response was received by the DWG.
eggie (2021-10-24 20:03:11+00:00): Marcel.. best lastig met editor iD. Die heeft de neiging alles aan elkaar te plakken. 'k Heb links in het terrein nog wat los gemaakt. Al doende leert men.
Ik gebruik editor iD. Dan selecteer ik zo'n vlak en druk op G.
Dan is kan ik de wegen verplaatsen. De vlakken landuse  plak ik vervolgens weer aan elkaar. Dat doet josm Zelf.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710     

Gewoon eens starten met die editor. Een aanrader.
Verder lag de Haspelstraat dubbel. Duplicated ways. Dat zul je met iD niet eens kunnen zien. Ik heb het verbeterd.
Josm heeft een betere ingebouwde validator. Die geeft dan de foute aan. Die wegen lichten op.
Daarna is het simpel te herstellen.
In het midden onderin zie ik nog een weg door dat huis lopen.
Volgens mijn foto van 2021 loopt die weg daar niet.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.57588/4.56929

M
eggie (2021-10-24 20:04:09+00:00): Maar genoeg te doen hier en vooral plezier in mappen krijgen en houden. Mooi oefenproject.
Succes,
eggie
HellMap (2023-02-12 16:10:06+00:00): Hi!

Do you remember and could you verify the location and details of this fence you encountered in relation to nearby features - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/996110018. There's a stream with wood plank bridge, but the Mapillary footage is older than when you added the fence, so I am not sure about the details. I am assuming there's a gate or something? Can you pass through/by it?

Thanks
artuuurs (2023-02-13 06:09:41+00:00): Hi @HellMap!
The path where I added the fence fragment used to be the primary and only path. But recently a fence was built around the nearby private territory (house) and an alternative, slightly longer path was created. The old path is not accessible to regular people anymore. I saw there was a fence but I didn't come close or along it, so I don't have a precise line, but I wanted to show map users that there is a fence and it's impossible to go through.
Marek-M (2024-07-11 17:24:12+00:00): Kategoria drogi nie niesie informacji czy jest to droga publiczna czy nie - do tego służą tagi `access`. Droga lokalna (residential) jest zbyt wysoką kategorią dla dojazdu do dwóch posiadłości. highway=service jest wystarczający.