piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Richard (2021-02-22 12:30:34+00:00): This is silly. Of course a Facebook page is a website. It's delivered over HTTP (the "web") and accessible on a consistent, unchanging URL ("site"). It is none of our business whether a company has chosen to use Facebook, Wix, Squarespace, Wordpress or any other off-the-shelf hosting/design solution for their site.

By doing this, you are making it significantly less likely that data consumers will make use of mappers' contributions. For example, on cycle.travel, I show cyclists the website tag for a ferry (where available) so that they can look up current times of operation, charges, etc. I use the website tag for this. Under your change, I'd have to fall back to scanning every contact:* tag to see whether any of them begins with /https?:\/\//. Pretty obviously, lots of consumers aren't going to do this, so you've just made OSM data less accessible.

Please (a) stop doing this (b) go outside and do some useful mapping (c) in future, discuss mass changes like this in advance. Thank you.
0815jh007 (2021-02-22 17:18:01+00:00): Maproulette tells: "There is an extra tag for facebook pages: 'contact:facebook'. Even if a place does not have a website, the website tag is not intended for a Facebook page."
Richard (2021-02-22 17:23:47+00:00): Maproulette is not infallible, and in this case is wrong. Can you provide a link to the Maproulette challenge?
paulatthehug (2021-02-22 17:42:37+00:00): ... and the OSM Wiki clearly says that the thing the OP is "correcting" is perfectly valid mark up:
"If a social media web presence is the only web presence of the POI (point-of-interest), then some taggers prefer to also list the url using website=* to indicate that no other official website exists."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website
0815jh007 (2021-02-22 17:47:48+00:00): "some taggers prefer to.. " is quite soft. sounds like "that one is okay, too". but when both ones are okay and maproulett makes a challenge for the new contact:facebook, then things could possibly start to get changed. and now i get blamed for that. thats a little odd.
the challenge is separated in countries. e.g. for germany it is: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/16122
Richard (2021-02-22 17:52:23+00:00): Thank you. Reported at https://twitter.com/richardf/status/1363909152582627328 .

"now i get blamed for that" - yes, because MapRoulette doesn't give you carte blanche to break stuff just because some rando who uploaded a challenge says so.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-22 21:28:18+00:00): As this edit is in violation of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct anyone may revert it.

I did it right now.

In general, MapRoulette has many challenges that are pointless or encourage damaging of OSM data. Anyone may create task there, you must use your brain if you use it.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-22 21:47:23+00:00): @0815jh007

"now i get blamed for that" - yes, because you were already informed about necessity to consult local community and you continued to edit.

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99618573 

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/99624114 - you were linked to rules about bot edits
0815jh007 (2021-02-24 03:46:48+00:00): https://www.facebook.com is a website. Every partial url on facebook is just a webpage, its neither a homepage, just a subpage of something that the operator facebook can change whenever Facebook wants to. The contact:facebook-tag is there for reasons and my changes did improve the values of those nodes/ways/... by even checking the availability of those urls when they were redirections on facebook.
Whats is provable: Facebook changes its URLs when they want to and they did in some places.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-24 08:10:07+00:00): > https://www.facebook.com is a website. Every partial url on facebook is just a webpage

It is not changing that such webpages are also (sadly) used as websites by many businesses. Sometimes sole online presence.

Note wordpress.com and websites such as https://gesanwrc.wordpress.com/ (hopefully noone was moving such website tags to contact:wordpress )

> Whats is provable: Facebook changes its URLs when they want to and they did in some places.

And? This affect also contact:facebook and regular domains wholly owned by businesses
0815jh007 (2021-02-24 08:43:59+00:00): Thank you, Mateusz for your understandingly answer.
Afaik there is no tag contact:wordpress. But the point is, if you control your own website its is worth tagging that as website.
And website urls should be as short as possible.
For those who only have a facebook site there is a separate tag: contact:facebook. Perhaps we should go on diskussing that on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website
paulatthehug (2021-02-24 09:33:33+00:00): Has anyone passed details of this incident, and related changesets on to the Data Working Group as it seems to me there are issues here for them ...
SomeoneElse (2021-02-24 12:27:35+00:00): @paulatthehug - Yes, someone raised a ticket with us late Monday night.  We were also aware of people complaining about it elsewhere (including Twitter).
SomeoneElse (2021-02-24 12:36:28+00:00): @0815jh007 Re "For those who only have a facebook site there is a separate tag: contact:facebook" that doesn't reflect real life - For many businesses their Facebook page IS their website.  You might not like that, but that is how it is.  For others of course it's a separate social channel with different content on it.  That's essentially why an automatic retagging such as you have done is inappropriate.  When tagging small businesses such as pubs I've often asked myself "is that facebook page their website, or is it just a social channel" and using an appropriate OSM tag based on that decision.
santamariense (2021-02-24 13:17:30+00:00): I agree with 0815jh007, contact:facebook=* or even facebook=* should be the correct way of mapping FB fan pages or profiles.
SomeoneElse (2021-02-24 13:21:39+00:00): @santamariense The problem was that a number of Facebook websites aren't "FB fan pages or profiles", they're actually used by the business concerned as their website.  Where both exist, I'd definitely map both.  When adding a Facebook page for a business I'll always ask myself "is this basically their website or is it something else?".
SomeoneElse (2021-02-24 13:24:33+00:00): Mateusz mentions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct above.  That specifically exists to make sure that people discuss changes such as this before performing them, to ensure that (a) their understanding of "how things are used in OSM" has the benefit of other points of view and (b) to let data consumers know about any change.
Valor Naram (2021-03-29 17:58:27+00:00): Please thing logically and take the following user story as a lead (I have experience in user experience design and have also contact some women doing it professionally):

User Story 1: User clicks on the 'Facebook' icon displayed on the POI and expects to be taken to the Facebook page.
User Story 2: User clicks on the "Website" icon displayed on the POI and expects to be taken to the non-Facebook page like example.com

Negating User Stories (only in combination with positive ones) and are mostly used for clarification but not standalone (not ideal example of its use here):
User Story 1: User clicks on the 'Facebook' icon displayed on the POI and does not expect to be taken to the website page outside Facebook domain.
User Story 2: User clicks on the "Website" icon displayed on the POI and does not expect to be taken to the Facebook page like https://facebook/example
Valor Naram (2021-03-29 18:02:18+00:00): > By doing this, you are making it significantly less likely that data consumers will make use of mappers' contributions.

Wrong assumption. Of course will data customers differentiate between pages created using Facebook (refered to "Facebook pages") and normal websites hosted on Wix, Jimdo, Strato, self hosting etc. And they always will no matter if the Facebook page is the only one "website" of the POI. It will be treated the same as all Facebook pages and does not get any special status for being the only one website the POI has.
Richard (2021-03-29 18:09:14+00:00): Sigh.
paulatthehug (2021-03-29 18:16:26+00:00): > Sigh.

You took the word right out of my mouth :-(
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-03-29 19:43:09+00:00): And mine.
berndw (2021-02-23 09:05:35+00:00): Hallo

willkommen bei OpenStreetMap

Vielen Dank für Deine Beiträge, ich habe aber ein paar Einwände

Auch wenn der Sayntalhof eine Adresse Sayntalstraße hat, muss man die Ortsstraße (highway=residential) nicht bis zu diesem Gebäude führen, man kann auch wegen der geringen Verkehrsbedeutung den Wert highway=service verwenden.
Näheres findest Du hier:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:highway?uselang=de

Außerdem bitte ich Dich, in der Region die besser positionierten Luftbilder von ESRI als Hintergrund zu verwenden.

Ansonsten viel Spaß beim Mappen

Bernd
berndw (2021-02-23 09:08:56+00:00): Das mit den Hintergrundbildern schränke ich etwas ein.
Die neuen BING-Bilder sind besser und aktueller.
Ich passe die Landnutzung an die neuen Gebäude an, den rest überlasse ich Dir

Bernd
DaveF (2021-02-22 14:59:26+00:00): Hi
Please don't automatically accept iD validation as being correct. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107287288
DaveF (2021-02-22 15:03:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107287309#map=17/52.97907/-1.99137
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:28:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
flohoff (2021-02-25 16:21:25+00:00): Moin,
ich habe gesehen das du ganz viele Tracks bearbeitest. foot/bicycle=yes ist default auf tracks. Muss man nicht taggen.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258437392

Siehe auch hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access_restrictions#Germany

Flo
Cristoffs (2021-02-23 23:38:13+00:00): Na jakiej podstawie dokonałeś tej zmiany?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99738592
marxwell (2021-02-24 07:55:33+00:00): Własne obserwacje ;)

Zdjęcia z Mapboksa i Maxar (te niestety przedstawiają dość wczesny etap, gdzie teren był rozkopany. Jedyne dokładne zdjęcia są na stronie inwestycji u dewelopera
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:26:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
timmito (2021-02-22 16:12:12+00:00): Hallo surveyor54, Danke für die Aktualisierungen. Ist das ref vom Rettungspunkt wirklich nur 213 oder nicht doch eher OF-213?
surveyor54 (2021-02-22 21:54:20+00:00): Du hast recht, muss OF-213 heißen, ich hatte nur die Lage korrigiert.
Werde es gleich ändern.
datendelphin (2021-02-22 17:42:47+00:00): Hallo DriveLab,

du hast es etwas gut gemeint mit den vielen tags. OSM ist keine Bewertungsplatfrom, das bringt hier nichts. Auch muss ich feststellen, dass du deine Fahrschule auf öffentlichen Parkplätzen platziert hast. Wir erfassen aber nur permanente und erkennbare Einrichtungen. Also dein Büro/Schulungsraum haben wir gerne auf der Karte mit diesen tags, falls es so etwas gibt. Diese Eintragungen hingegen werde ich wieder entfernen, da das so leider nicht in OSM passt.

Grüsse
Michael
DriveLab (2021-02-23 08:22:21+00:00): 
Hallo Michael

Danke für die Antwort.
Die Tags sollten der Sichtbarkeit dienen und nicht für Bewertungen.
Wie kann ich dann auf meinem Wordpress Plugin die Standorte finden? Auf der OSM Map kann ich nur auf existierende Standorte zugreifen. Ich dachte der Sinn von OSM liegt darin, dass die Karte durch die Nutzer gestaltet werden. Bei Google Maps konnte ich meine Standorte problemlos eintragen.
DriveLab Zug
076 237 13 07
https://maps.app.goo.gl/HjyNghaXZ6EdSfY39

Lg

Dario
datendelphin (2021-02-23 17:38:25+00:00): Hallo Dario 

Ich kenne dieses Wordpress plugin nicht. Scheint mir aber etwas komisch, dass man dort nur Elemente hervorheben kann, welche in OSM drin sind. Versuch doch mal zum Beispiel https://umap.osm.ch dort kann man beliebige Marker setzen und es würde sich per iframe einbinden lassen. 

Grüsse 
Michael
mariotomo (2021-09-26 22:42:38+00:00): hi. could you please review your work? you have 14 duplicated areas on your name in Bocas Town. 909582121 909582123 909589122 909589123 909589124 909589125 909589126 909601275 913038848 913038850 913041303 913047267 913047268 913047269 330875899 330875903 232947968 232948125 232948047 232948251 232948249 232948250 232947955 232947960 232947956 232947961 318224490 255401355
WebiShabeelle (2021-09-28 08:11:25+00:00): Hi mariotomo, I was working on reviewing buildings inside the ocean having the support of a pier. So in these cases I have polygonalized buildings with piers underneath. The default configuration of JOSM considers it "Way with the same position", but still you can see both the features are tagged differently (building=* & man_made=pier). I hope this helps, thanks for reaching out.
mariotomo (2021-09-28 22:32:56+00:00): hi. I see, makes sense … yet, in order to avoid such warnings, what about one of the three options? (1) using a relation; (2) opening an issue on JOSM; (3) adding a note to alert subsequent mappers that this is as intended.
WebiShabeelle (2021-10-04 21:21:42+00:00): Hi mariotomo, thank you for the suggestions. Your first point may not apply since there would be many single member multipolygon relations which is discouraged in OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Multipolygon_created_by_only_one_polygon). However, it does look like someone has already submitted a ticket with the same complaint https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/11175#no1, hopefully this gets some traction with JOSM developers!
mariotomo (2021-10-05 00:00:47+00:00): hola. while indeed it is **discouraged** to create single member multipolygon relations, your example (Multipolygon_created_by_only_one_polygon) shows a different situation. I do not know, we should take the discussion to a broader platform, but I think that "discouraged" would not apply to this specific case.
I must say: I have occasionally placed buildings on water just like that, no thought whatsoever about putting a pier below it, just the pier and path reaching it.  but then again, I do not know what is correct and what is usable and what is necessary, so let me know if you raise the question on any platform, thanks.
WebiShabeelle (2021-10-06 23:15:09+00:00): Thanks for the suggestions, I’ll let you know if I end up raising the issue. Another option would be to tag the building as a stilt_house (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dstilt_house). The main point here is that the building likely isn’t just directly on the water so there is either a pier underneath it or there are stilts holding it up. Thanks for sharing your thoughts here!
l3BAM (2023-08-26 18:10:23+00:00): Il s'agit effectivement de boules de sable et pas de boules de fort comme vu sur le terrain. Une exposition le long du terrain le confirme. Ce n'est pas du tout le même sport.
marc__marc (2023-08-27 10:12:45+00:00): merci, je vais documenter cette nouvelle valeur avec les infos de https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boule_de_sable
l3BAM (2023-08-28 12:05:21+00:00): Merci beaucoup.
ottwiz (2021-02-22 11:24:42+00:00): A Vághó Ferenc utcát kettészabdaltam, mert az iparterületre nem lehet csak úgy bejutni, egyszerűen el van kerítve, csak a Kosd utcára lehet rámenni
eggie (2021-02-22 12:00:51+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-02-22 12:13:23+00:00): Dag Slagers.. Op de meeste kaarten zijn adresnummers niet zichtbaar, maar wel vindbaar.
Op de standaardkaart zie je het adres niet als er een combinatie wordt gemaakt met het bedrijf.
Die combinatie is wel conform mappen binnen OSM Nederland.
Je hebt het dus correct getagd.
MVG
eggie
Buraddo (2021-02-22 19:47:19+00:00): Salut.
Care dintre clădirile adăugate de tine este grădinița? Pune te rog tag la clădire building=kindergarten.

De asemenea în alt changeset ai șters areal școlii. De ce ai făcut asta?
Joske1020 (2026-04-24 17:23:27+00:00): ookal is deze changeset vrij oud, hier nog steeds de tip: bij aangeplant bos gebruik je altijd landuse=forest en bij natuurlijk bos (natuurlijk ontwikkeld bos of bos dat altijd bos is geweest) gebruik je natural=wood
Warin61 (2024-01-30 06:14:35+00:00): 3 year and still have crossing buildings...
clay_c (2021-10-12 17:17:52+00:00): Hallo flierfy,

Die kurze Linie »Escape Track« ist nicht usage=main. Es trägt seltenen Verkehr und hat eine Grenzgeschwindigkeit von 10 mph (~15 km/h).

Hier zurückgekehrt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112427424

//

Hello flierfy,

The short Escape Track here is not usage=main. It seldom carries traffic and has a speed limit of 10 mph (~15 km/h).

Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112427424
flierfy (2021-10-18 20:47:55+00:00): Das seh ich aber anders. Das ist ein wichtiges Streckengleis, ohne das CSX die Industriebetriebe in Chester nur schlecht erreicht. Und als Streckengleis muss es dann auch in der Karte zu sehen sein. Die geringe Höchstgeschwindigkeit wird wohl dem schlechten Zustand des Gleises geschuldet sein und ob das Verkehrsvolumen gross oder klein ist, ist relativ. Beide Grössen können sich mit der Zeit ändern und sind somit schechte Kriterien, um Gleise zu kategorisieren.
Viele Grüsse, Stephan
clay_c (2021-10-19 03:43:22+00:00): Continuing in English, because the mapping community here converses in English.

CSX traffic, which generally follows the Philadelphia Subdivision through town, uses the Chester Secondary to access Chester. It does not need to detour through the Escape Track. As it is today, the Escape Track rarely carries traffic. The purpose of usage=* and service=* is to record how the track is used currently, regardless of what it was in the past or how it may be in the future.

I would encourage you to read through the guidelines for OpenRailwayMap tagging in North America [1] and to join the OpenStreetMap US Slack [2]. We have an active railway mapping community in #rail, and we're always happy to answer questions.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging_in_North_America

[2] https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
manoj@123 (2021-02-22 12:16:14+00:00): Here I used Mapillary.
manoj@123 (2021-02-22 12:17:15+00:00): Adding destination sign information as seen from Mapillary or OpenStreetCam #MSFTOpenMaps #maproulette
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99744639
hsc666 (2021-02-22 17:02:56+00:00): Hi pitfire,

danke für Deine Nachricht. Ich packe meinen Kommentar trotzdem mal hier rein, damit sich niemand wundert. ;-) Sieht grundsätzlich ok aus, aber guck bitte nochmal auf die Ways nördlich von <https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/246546834>, da warst Du zu schnell mit dem Löschen - da fehlt nämlich das man_made=dyke. Solltest Du vielleicht noch ergänzen.

VG
hsc666
pitfire (2021-02-22 20:39:09+00:00): Die fehlenden Einträge man_made=dyke sind jetzt nachgetragen :-)  pitfire
felipeeugenio (2021-02-22 14:19:03+00:00): Hola. Building es para la estructura, no para el recinto completo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99744799
Marek-M (2021-02-22 12:14:28+00:00): Cześć, Widzę, że edytujesz kościoły :) W związku przeprowadzaną ogólnopolską akcją poprawiania nazw obiektów religijnych chciałbym, żebyś zwrócił uwagę przy swoich edycjach na rozwijanie nazw kościołów do pełnych słów (bez skrótów). Skrót 'pw.' jest poprawny ale 'św.' powinien być zapisany jako 'Świętego'. Stronka wyłapujące błędy w obiektach religijnych to: https://plname.usermd.net , szczegóły jak nazywać kościoły są na Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dplace_of_worship#Nazewnictwo_obiekt.C3.B3w_sakralnych 
Dzieki!
Sigridstorrada (2021-02-22 12:26:52+00:00): Dziękuję za pomoc. Oczywiście poprawię na pełną nazwę Świętego / Świętej. Sprawdzam parafię po parafii w oparciu o kolejne strony diecezji - zrobiłam elbląską tczewską, a teraz jadę po pelplińskiej i staram się korygować. Pozdrawiam serdecznie,
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:42:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Dodko (2021-09-21 18:09:00+00:00): Otváracie hodiny https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8445663231/history
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/909608812/history
 sa majú písať v predpísanom formáte, inak to aplikácie nevedia zobraziť.
Pomôcka je https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-05 13:27:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 105882167, 105878073 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5047 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-13 17:44:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 106288172, 106291668 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some road merge edits in South Africa.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5046 and https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-za/2021-May/thread.html#1295 .
Nakaner (2021-10-26 14:08:29+00:00): Hallo,

ihr habt ja schon arg lange Hausnummern in Weyhe. Pass auf, was in deiner Zwischenablage steckt. Es könnte auch ein Passwort sein. ;-)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8445696163/history

Viele Grüße

Michael
abcgaertner (2021-10-31 15:56:39+00:00): Moin Michael,

hm Copy-paste will gelernt sein.
zum Glück bin ich mit senibleren Daten vorsichtiger. Aber danke für den Hinweis und die Korrektur ;-)

Gruß
Florian
joost schouppe (2021-02-23 09:57:04+00:00): Hoi Erin,
Het woonzorgcentrum Lucie Lambert ligt niet in Kluisbos maar in de Nachtegaalstraat. Het was daar ook al gemapped. Dit pand is gewoon in gebruik als flatgebouw. Ik draai deze wijziging dus terug.
Erin76 (2021-02-23 10:48:33+00:00): Dag Joost, dank voor de correctie. Ik was er gepasseerd, ik heb mij inderdaad van straat gemist.
ToniE (2021-02-22 13:20:26+00:00): Welcome at OSM Linn Song,

the address was already mapped (2 months ago)

there's more than one way to map addresses though.

The other mapper decided to tag the address at the building, which is one way of adding addresses to OSM (you can see the number on the map below the position of your entry).

A second option is to map addresses where the main entrance is  ... you can see this at housenumbers 18, 20, 22

An there's another option - which you have chosen - to map the address close to the entrance inside the building.

However, an address should obviously be mapped only once.

I will revert you edit ...

Thanks for joining OSM and have fun ...

Br
Toni
DD1GJ (2021-02-22 13:52:33+00:00): Es entspricht überhaupt nicht den Gepflogenheiten des Projektes, mit frisch angelegtem Account gleich alles umzukrempelm. Solche Sockenpuppen-Accounts werden bei anhalteten Mapping gesperrt and alle Bearbeitungen zurückgesetzt.