piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
aceman444 (2020-04-01 17:09:32+00:00): Nie, obec Miloslavov je https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26037279 . A ta sa sklada z casti Miloslava a Alzbetin Dvor, aspon podla wikipedie.
mapko (2020-04-01 19:38:47+00:00): Sorry, prehladal som vsetko mozne a ziadnu cast Miloslava som nenasiel.
aceman444 (2020-04-01 20:10:43+00:00): Cast "Miloslava" spominaju na mnohych strankach:
https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miloslavov#Polohopis
http://www.miloslavov.sk/obec/#historia
https://www.rezidenciamiloslavov.sk/lokalita
Na googli stovky vysledkov.

Tu je register casti obci:
https://www.minv.sk/?uzemne-a-spravne-usporiadanie-sr&subor=233491

Tam maju tiez to delenie na 2 casti, ale tuto cast volaju "Miloslavov".
mapko (2020-04-01 20:30:12+00:00): To je mozno historicky nazov, ale v zakladnom registri je cast Miloslavov. Je to aj oficialny nazov obce. Obe boli v OSM nespravne.
aceman444 (2020-04-01 20:34:18+00:00): Oficialny nazov obce je na bode, ktory reprezentuje obec: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/26037279 a tam je spravny. Bavime sa o objekte, co reprezentuje len cast obce. Ak teda myslite, ze je to stary nazov (aj ked ho vsetci pouzivaju), tak ho ponechajte aspon v alt_name .
mapko (2020-04-01 20:40:57+00:00): Nie je v Registri Adries, tak nemoze byt v karastri, obcianskom, mape... Doplnil som alt_name.
aceman444 (2020-04-01 20:57:29+00:00): To neznamena, ze to neexistuje :) Mame v OSM plno lokalnych, starych ci aj chybnych nazvov, ktore ale proste su napisane na objektoch v reali.

Ale ako pozeram tabule pri ceste, tak tato cast ma naozaj na vjazde len Miloslavov a ta druha ma tabulu "Miloslavov - miestna cast Alzbetin Dvor".

Dakujem za doplnenie.
mapko (2020-04-01 21:06:55+00:00): Ked som upravoval R7 mi to brnklo do nosa. Bolo to ako hrubka Myloslavov ;)
aceman444 (2020-04-01 23:51:55+00:00): No pozeram, ze to tam stale svieti, lebo nazov ste opravili na oblasti, ale na bode stale ostalo Miloslava. Tak som to tam trochu upratal. Inak bol tam o tom uz note https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1883617, takze dakujem.
mapko (2020-04-02 11:09:41+00:00): Evidentne sme sa nepochopili a k tomu som este aj strateny. Menil som 2 objekty:
- Residential Area z Miloslava na Miloslavov a potom na bez name, lebo Residential Area sa nepomenovava
- nieco co malo takmer rovnaky tvar ako Residential Area ale uz tam nie je. Tam som zmenil name z Miloslava na Miloslavov a potom doplnil alt_name Miloslava.
aceman444 (2020-04-02 15:48:35+00:00): Ano, tak to bolo. Ale je tam este aj dalsi bod s place=suburb v strede casti obce, kde bolo tiez name=Miloslava a to tam zostalo. Takze ten som tiez opravil.
literan (2020-03-31 13:30:46+00:00): There is no free access for vehicles here! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3225218105/history#map=18/55.85107/37.49527

Reverting #fakeappleediting
MapsterBlaster (2020-04-01 18:34:50+00:00): Hi literan, thanks for commenting!
I added the access=permissive tag on node 3225218105 based on my understanding of both global OSM policy (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access) and the RU OSM access policy page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access). Due to a lack of visible signage on this gate in ground imagery, coupled with what looks to be the ability for security/building owners to revoke access at any time, the access=permissive tag seemed most appropriate. Is there an additional indication that this would not be the case?

If you have any other questions or concerns, please reach out!
literan (2020-04-01 19:05:45+00:00): access=permissive means that access for everything and everybody now free (but can be get not free in future).  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access

I don't know about other countries, but in Russia almost always lift_gate means that there is NO free access for cars. I suppose that it's not good practice to add such tags like access without visiting this place
MapsterBlaster (2020-04-02 19:31:52+00:00): Thanks for the information.
agft4271 (2020-03-30 21:07:46+00:00): Sorry, I forgot to change the change set. What I really did was That I added solid stop markings and added turn lanes and a building and some roads.
literan (2020-03-31 13:06:50+00:00): Why permissive? I know this place, there is no free access there for motor vehicle - only private. Look at panoramas: closed lift_gate, private parking https://yandex.ru/maps/213/moscow/?l=stv%2Csta&ll=37.353114%2C55.708390&panorama%5Bdirection%5D=270.267705%2C3.641352&panorama%5Bfull%5D=true&panorama%5Bpoint%5D=37.606362%2C55.977132&panorama%5Bspan%5D=119.012723%2C80.000000&z=16
literan (2020-03-31 13:12:07+00:00): reverting #fakeappleediting
EarlEBird (2020-04-01 18:39:05+00:00): Hello literan, thank you for reaching out. 

I added “access=permissive” to this barrier based on the Yandex Panorama, as well as the definition of “permissive” found on the Russian OSM wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:access#Значения). I believed that the presence of the lift gate suggests that permission to enter can be revoked at any time, but now I understand now that this location is not open for free access by vehicles. May I ask why you replaced the “access” tag with “motor_vehicle”? Do you believe access is different for pedestrians/cyclists? Also, what are your thoughts on the use of “barrier=gate” vs “barrier=lift_gate” in this situation, as it appears the metal gate may close in front of the lift_gate?

EarlEBird
literan (2020-04-01 19:08:51+00:00): access=permissive means that access for everything and everybody now free (but can be get not free in future). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access ("Open to general traffic until such time as the owner revokes the permission"). Here is NOT open.

I don't know about other countries, but in Russia almost always lift_gate means that there is NO free access for cars. I suppose that it's not good practice to add such tags like access without visiting this place

Also, I think that the most good way here to map both the gate and the lift_gate
DENelson83 (2020-03-31 00:56:56+00:00): Thanks for the help.  Good start.  :)
kbiddle (2020-03-30 23:01:12+00:00): @llessur_assilem Yes, a mistake. My apologies!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82844593
PT-53 (2020-03-31 06:10:07+00:00): Hallo happy2121,
Willkommen bei OSM.

Das Merkmal Name ist nur für echte Eigennamen vorgesehen. Doppelgarage gehört nichr dazu und wurde von mir wieder gelöscht.
Wiki:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name

Grüße
impiaaa (2020-03-31 14:30:51+00:00): I took care during the import to only collapse addresses that didn't have accurate locations. Here it looks like they did, and it would have been useful for finding the location of an address within the building. By removing them it feels like you're [tagging for the renderer](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer).
dead10ck (2020-03-31 15:37:36+00:00): My commit message was a bit terse, so let me elaborate a bit.

The address nodes were all for units that were on different floors, and they were all just placed next to each other; moreover, they didn't show up in searches (I tested this before making the change). Even if you looked visually at the rendered unit numbers, it was very noisy, and would have been hard to find a unit that way. I used to live in this building, and I can tell you that the way this was set up with address nodes, it would not have been very useful for trying to find an individual unit within the building.

Furthermore, having dozens of tags that all have the same street address creates lots of data redundancy, which also makes searching harder.

There were lots of problems with the data the way it was; this was not a change that was solely "for the renderer."
impiaaa (2020-03-31 17:16:43+00:00): Other countries have a convention to offset address nodes that are on different floors. Just because Nomanatim can't find addresses with unit numbers doesn't mean it isn't valuable information; another search engine could fix that. I still think worrying about how the information is displayed in Carto is wrong: a better renderer could be smarter about placement or visibility. But if you know that the locations are actually incorrect, then that's okay.
Shohreh (2020-09-17 10:52:56+00:00): Bonjour,

Amenity + shop, c'est pas mutuellement exclusif ?

Ne vaut-il pas mieux utiliser
amenity=cafe
service:bicycle:repair=yes
?
Syl (2020-09-22 17:31:20+00:00): Bonjour, je ne suis pas sûr que cela soit mutuellement exclusif, je ne sais pas si il y a quelque chose à ce sujet sur le wiki.
En tout cas ils sont très régulièrement mis ensemble pour les stations services et les hôtels-restaurants par exemple.
Shohreh (2020-09-22 18:11:33+00:00): Merci
JJIglesias (2020-03-31 00:15:05+00:00): Saludos Marco Antonio; si bien es correcto q la zona residencial en la Minera San Cristobal son los Dormitorios de los Trabajadores,para el INE y el OEP esa zona es una poblacion permanente, pues tiene poblacion fija y asiento electoral...
Cuidate
JJ
jambamkin (2021-03-16 20:15:39+00:00): Hi DMcDowall, Not sure if this is helpful, but just letting you know you added a rather large building in this changeset. I've reused it for a garage. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/786037091
nevw (2020-03-31 03:03:25+00:00): Hi
I edited your business tags as I expect the shop tag value was not generic enough to render on the map. I added the previous shop value to a cuisine= tag.
Please check in a couple of days to see if it renders on on the map.
literan (2020-03-31 13:20:25+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1659677648/history - bad edit. We have no free access for vehicles to hospitals in Russia (often by foot only by special access too - due to terror hazard). Look: https://yandex.ru/maps/-/CKuzVRO1 on the paper "Въезд строго по пропускам" means "Access for vehicles only by passes"

Reverting #fakeappleediting
mapatite (2020-04-01 18:42:53+00:00): Hi literan, thank you for reaching out.

I added the access=permissive tag here, because I saw the lift gate and the signage you referenced in ground level imagery. I observed that this service road leads to a parking lot behind the hospital, so my understanding was that the area is accessible to the public, upon payment in exchange for a pass. Based on access tag definitions established on the Russian OSM Wiki, I presumed these conditions fit best with access=permissive, although I now understand that public vehicles do not have easy access to hospitals in Russia. Thank you for clarifying, and please let me know if you have anymore questions or comments.

-mapatite
literan (2020-04-01 19:11:48+00:00): access=permissive means that access for everything and everybody now free (but can be get not free in future). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access ("Open to general traffic until such time as the owner revokes the permission"). Here is NOT open.

I don't know about other countries, but in Russia almost always (not only in case of hospitals) lift_gate means that there is NO free access for cars. I suppose that it's not good practice to add such tags like access without visiting this place
mapatite (2020-04-02 18:00:22+00:00): Thanks!
chachafish (2020-04-10 16:03:11+00:00): Howdy, again. This changeset has the same issues as with the last changeset where I left a comment for you. Minimum requirements for addresses are 1) street number and 2) street name. Could you go back and correct these buildings? Thanks :)
tux67 (2023-08-13 11:45:09+00:00): Hi, 
ich wollte gerade den Streetcomplete User hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/139796782
anschreiben, weil er mit seinem Mapping an Node und Way für Abfalleimer und Shelter m.E die Informationen doppelt. Aber vorher vielleicht kurz an dich die Rückfrage .. ist das initiale Mapping hier noch aktuell? name etc. sind ja auch an beidem doppelt?

Gruß
tux67
axelr (2023-08-14 15:21:02+00:00): Für public_transport ist festgelegt, dass das Wartehäuschen gemappt wird ODER ersatzweise an der Platform eingetragen wird. Für den bus_stop gibt es keine derartige Festlegung.

In Ponds gehört shelter=yes nicht an die platform.

Gruß, Axel
mueschel (2020-04-01 08:00:59+00:00): Hi,
you imported a huge amount of data (Nodes: 156272, Ways: 4259). All these areas don't have any valid tag.
Please explain what this data is. Where can we find the documentation and discussion of this import?
vpmammana (2020-04-01 13:13:23+00:00): These are data on the low income  neighborhoods of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, the biggest cities in Brazil. The source is IBGE, which performs the main population survey in the country. The relevance of these data is because it allows one to plan relevant social aid on these areas. 

Unfortunatelly I am not versed on OSM, so I am not able to input the tags... But I a have a full GPX file that has the tags. If you can help me...
mueschel (2020-04-01 13:17:20+00:00): Unfortunately, this is not how imports in OSM are handled.
First they need to be announced, documented and discussed. Tagging has to be settled and agreed on. After that the import can be done.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines

I opt for removing the data from OSM again and then redo the import after following the necessary steps.
mueschel (2020-04-01 13:18:14+00:00): ... There are also problems with the data quality. Many of the areas have overlapping ways and nodes which should be removed. The alignment with existing data is not very good as well.
vpmammana (2020-04-01 13:38:17+00:00): How do I remove it? Through JOSM?

Can you remove it for me?

I need to start from scratch...
vpmammana (2020-04-01 13:41:26+00:00): When you say "overlapping ways" are you refering to ways in the sense of streets, avenues, etc?

The data a used refers to area limits, not to streets... should I use a different type of polygon for that?
mueschel (2020-04-01 13:51:36+00:00): Removing all this again is quite some effort.

Overlapping means, if there is a border between two areas, they should share the border line. You added individual nodes for each of them. In some places there are 8 nodes right on top of each other - 1 would be correct.
JOSM should have shown you a huge amount of warnings because of that before you uploaded the data.

There are also places with 4 of these boundaries running parallel to each other with a distance of just 1 meter.
vpmammana (2020-04-01 14:29:09+00:00): It showed warnings, but also mentioned that the problems could be fixed later. 

Please, note that the overlapping is because there are different information for each region, meaning that those are boundaries to diffent areas of the same community.
vpmammana (2020-04-01 14:32:13+00:00): there should be some query to remove the data, or not? I assume the data is connected to my profile. I wonder if OSM has this capabiliy, otherwise it would be very vulnerable. Is there a guide you could suggest for me to remove the data?
vpmammana (2020-04-01 14:35:04+00:00): Explaining again the overlapping: consider a major low income neighborhood which is devided into minor sub-regions... One may be intereseted on divise such subregions, meaing the boundaries, although are overlapping, refer to different subregions.
vpmammana (2020-04-01 14:48:29+00:00): Another point: I remember marking the option "ask a reviewer to review my data", or something equivalent, before uploading it... I assume it is just a matter of "rolling back" the operation, otherwise the option "review data" would make no sense.
mueschel (2020-04-01 14:57:45+00:00): I reverted the uploads. JOSM showed 45,000 warnings and errors - this is nothing one should ignore!
Regarding all the other questions you posted, changeset comments are not the right place to answer all of them. Please post them to the forums, mailing list or some of the other platforms.
vpmammana (2020-04-01 15:06:01+00:00): Thank you! Sorry for the extra work.

Considering this is a topic for planning, and the number of elements is relevant, as you mentioned, I wonder if this information is of interest for OSM. Note that this is just a portion of the data I have, since it refers just to 2 cities. Brazil has 5000 cities and I have information for it all! I bet another solution will be required, unless there is a specific interest of the OSM users on identifying low income communities along Brazilian cities.
IgorEliezer (2020-04-04 01:00:55+00:00): (in Portuguese)
Olá vpmammana, eu presumo que você seja brasileiro/a. Os dados são interessantes, mas gostaria de deixar um convite para entre no nosso grupo de discussão no Telegram ou no fórum. Talvez podemos te ajudar: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Canais_para_contato
mapman44 (2020-04-01 18:50:34+00:00): Please use changeset comments that provide more information about what you edited. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82846655
bbmiller (2020-03-31 12:26:10+00:00): Thanks, this edit looks good! I'd definitely rather ride a "bike path" than a "bile path."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82846750
Reeniz (2020-03-31 01:57:31+00:00): Hola, por que cambias el etiquetado de motoway_link a service?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82847041
whatmeinfallible (2020-04-01 17:59:00+00:00): Saludos,
Marqué estos caminos como servicio porque su único propósito es proporcionar acceso a una estación de combustible, como se describe en la página wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dservice.
Gracias.
Reeniz (2020-04-01 18:14:36+00:00): "Elsewhere, ramps that can only be accessed by using a part of the motorway should be motorway_links"
marc__marc (2020-04-04 12:32:35+00:00): Bonjour,
vous parlez de la clef reservation ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR%3AKey%3Areservation
donc reservation:covid19 au lieu de booking:covid19 ?
Cordialement,
Marc
mavOsaure (2020-04-05 20:03:21+00:00): Bonjour Marc,
Effectivement , merci d'avoir relevé la confusion. Il va falloir que je vérifies mes dernières contributions...
Amicalement,
mav
Warin61 (2020-04-01 07:27:24+00:00): This broke the administration boundaries for;
Mascot
Alexandria
Inner West Council
Council of the City Of Sydney. 

I have reverted this changeset. 
Separated boundaries from roads in the Campbell St/Rd area. 
Corrected the roads names; Campbell Street and Campbell Road. 

Please take care with the Admin boundaries embedded in the roads... There is lots of fixing to be done here... just in terms of OSM errors like levels crossing rivers, bridges ...
DUGA (2022-07-03 13:47:48+00:00): These links have no physical barriers, removed.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/786086350#map=19/38.72363/-75.12288
frosm (2020-04-01 14:02:48+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7349663432
à l'occasion pourriez-vous vérifier laquelle des 2 bornes a la prise type2 et laquelle a la prise type3 ?
Bonne continuation
Kovoschiz (2020-03-31 09:32:30+00:00): Please don't throw away information without replacement. The address and name of previous building is important. The land-use area / land lot is also unchanged. If the building hasn't been demolished, it should remain there and tagged as abandoned or in construction works (demolition). If it has, this should be a brownfield or construction site.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82851209
Kovoschiz (2020-03-31 09:37:44+00:00): So don't just delete it.
FirstGroupHK (2020-03-31 09:41:08+00:00): its a site now.
Kovoschiz (2020-03-31 11:24:26+00:00): Added https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82868382
user_5359 (2020-03-31 04:46:10+00:00): Hello! Please check your relations. Seven of your restriction relation haven't the keywort type and (i assumed) restriction.
mapman44 (2020-03-31 04:47:51+00:00): Thanks. I will work out the problems.
blackboxlogic (2020-10-09 22:44:34+00:00): It looks like you turned several miles of power lines into something you try to hit with a gold ball. It's been fixed, but do try to be careful with your edits. Thanks.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/82851700
user_5359 (2020-03-31 18:15:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data or not positive verifiable address data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
iriman (2020-03-31 13:52:04+00:00): سلام، گره شهر اراک همراه با تگ ویکی‌داده اینجا وجود دارد:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4698589016
Saeideh (2020-03-31 18:37:13+00:00): مرسی از بازخورد. حذفش میکنم
PT-53 (2020-03-31 05:55:34+00:00): Hallo johsin18,
nach Deinen Bearbeitungen wird jetzt im OSM-Inspector für diese Fläche
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22720672
ein Hinweis "self_intersection_ways" angezeigt:
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=9.68358&lat=48.10486&zoom=11&opacity=0.34
Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2020-03-31 05:57:07+00:00): PS:
Wenn Du eine kleine Fläche aus einer größeren Fläche "ausschneiden" willst, mußt Du dazu ein MP verwenden.
PT-53 (2020-03-31 05:58:25+00:00): PS:
Betrifft Änderungssatz: 82831282
johsin18 (2020-04-01 07:33:33+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis, aber das hat User landfahrer wohl schon für mich erledigt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82862951#map=16/48.7827/9.0326&layers=N
dcapillae_buildings-import (2020-03-31 05:27:22+00:00): This changeset should have been uploaded by dcapillae_buildings-import account (my mistake).
Patr1k_P (2022-02-22 12:31:28+00:00): to si uz pamatat asi nebudete ale nie je to skor wayside_shrine? Podla mozaiky mi to tak pride

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/786112181
aceman444 (2022-02-26 18:55:49+00:00): Myslim, ze ta budova 3x3 metre aj podla pohladu zhora na ortofoto splna https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:building%3Dshrine .

Prvy priklad na
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dwayside_shrine sice vyzera rovnako, ale vsetky ostatne uz nie. Je to dost iny objekt.
limes11 (2020-03-31 18:19:40+00:00): Hello nmotupal, 

Thank you for your contribution. The motivation to add these short service roads here is unclear. If you bother adding these, please use correct tags. This is not a public highway=track but allows access to a farm on private property.

Best wishes!
nmotupal (2020-04-01 12:38:17+00:00): Hi , I am very thankful for your time. I will take this as a learning from the community and assure that my future edits will be reflecting the ground reality. Thanks for your improvisation of the edits. Always happy to learn from the community.
Jordaan23 (2020-07-22 04:25:58+00:00): Hi Evgeniy1027, I found that you are changing the taxiways to taxilanes and modeling taxiway features as a polygonal features instead of linear. According to the wiki guideline, taxiway is more commonly modeled as a linear feature. Additionally, from what I can find on the wiki (taxilane wiki page) taxilanes are only meant to be modeled in the aircraft parking areas or aprons (see examples modeling approach), can you please explain your approach to modeling these features? 

Привет, Evgeniy1027. Я обнаружила, что вы меняете taxiway на taxilane и моделируете объекты taxiway как полигональные, а не линейные. Согласно руководству вики, чаще всего taxiway моделируется линией. Кроме того, из того что я могу найти на вики-странице (taxilane), taxilanes предназначены только для моделирования в зонах стоянки самолетов или перронах (см. примеры моделирования), не могли бы вы объяснить свой подход к моделированию этих объектов?
Evgeniy1027 (2020-07-28 13:54:00+00:00): Добрый день!
Необходимо было отобразить осевые линии рулежных дорожек, кроме как taxilane такой возможности нет. Сейчас информативность, на мой взгляд, стала подробнее.