piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SekeRob (2022-04-25 09:25:14+00:00): Hi,

As per the warnings above going with your change set, the buildings relation is not exactly perfect and has in OSM Inspector 6 points of unclosed rings (of building). The result is that 3/4 does not render. I've rebuild them. If you want to combine them, don't use multipolygon but the type=building relation and retag the buildings as building:part of that relation.

The mapped steps are flagged as a floating island i.e. not routable. I've added a way based on sat imagery and added steps at front entrance.
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/14073807 for the changes.

ciao

ciao.
Trevor_1 (2022-05-22 21:36:52+00:00): Why did you change FM 1204 to secondary? I had to change it back to tertiary. t only connects to the state highway system at one end, and it's not good to have secondary stubs. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/220423673
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:26:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Frans S (2022-05-01 11:10:00+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say that your mappings are not accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards. I reviewed a number of your changesets which shows everywhere the same issues.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn. Please pay more attention to following the outlines of a building (with extensions)
E: Rectangular Buildings, not squared. They are mostly strict rectangular.
I: Tagging of buildings. For HOTOSM projects the standard tagging is 'building=yes' Please keep that in mind at further mappings.

Please use the correct Imagery which is Maxar P on this project. You use an old Bing imagery  where new buildings are not shown


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120140040
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
tonyf1 (2022-05-08 02:53:18+00:00): There is shared path signage at OShea and Riviera.
tonyf1 (2022-05-15 00:38:27+00:00): see Changeset #120996442
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:32:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
VLD166 (2022-05-20 18:07:11+00:00): Hello,

I'm concerned with the names you've added. Are they the actual names of these features? If so, could you please provide any resources you used.

Regards,
Jordan Webster
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:31:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:28:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:22:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
felipeeugenio (2022-04-26 14:48:56+00:00): Estimado, por favor consultar con la comunidad de OSM Chile el tratamiento de ciertos tags. Está borrando información oficial del INE. ENtendemos que las ubicaciones pueden ser aproximadas en ciertas ocasiones y que alguien que conoce el sector puede ubicarlas mejor, pero por favor no borrar nada
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120141172
iv_m (2022-04-26 16:20:47+00:00): Ok, perdón, la info era desactualizada (han llegado muchas nuevas personas desde 2017, la población debe ser >200 ahora) y la junta de vecinos del sector actualmente está en el proceso de un censo territorial. Cuando termine, voy a poner un número más preciso.
user_5359 (2022-04-25 05:24:40+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please save your work before you change the area. Please also a look on the documentation (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours and
https://www.osm.org/way/213390639): the key opening_hours hasn't the target to add price information.
ABausD (2022-06-19 14:54:00+00:00): Hallo, du hast viele Objekte am Bremer Airbus Standort hinzugefügt. Es sieht so aus als ob du das Luftbild von Bing benutzt hast. Leider ist dieses Luftbild nicht aktuell. Es wurden z.B. Gebäude abgerissen. Die hast du wieder eingezeichnet, obwohl ich eine Notiz am way hinterlassen hatte ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309962296 ). Die vielen Fußwege sind an vielen Stellen nicht mit der Straße verbunden. Ein Router könnte damit keine sinvollen Routen berechnen (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks). Außerdem sollten die Wege mit access=private gekennzeichnet sein, da das Werksgelände nicht öffentlich ist.
Ich werde später einige deiner Änderungen überarbeiten.

Ich habe diesen Text mit Googel ins Französische übersetzt.
--- Translate ---
Bonjour, vous avez ajouté de nombreux objets sur le site Airbus de Brême. Il semble que vous ayez utilisé la photo aérienne de Bing. Malheureusement, cette photo aérienne n'est pas à jour. Par exemple, des bâtiments ont été démolis. Vous les avez dessinés à nouveau, même si j'ai laissé une note en chemin ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/309962296 ). Les nombreux sentiers pédestres ne sont pas reliés à la route à de nombreux endroits. Un routeur ne pourrait pas l'utiliser pour calculer des itinéraires significatifs (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sidewalks). De plus, les chemins doivent être marqués avec access=private, car les locaux de l'usine ne sont pas publics.
Je réviserai certaines de vos modifications plus tard.
ABausD (2022-06-19 15:06:20+00:00): Beispiel für Fußgängerrouting: https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=53.05393%2C8.79198%3B53.05335%2C8.79139

Exemple d'itinéraire piéton : https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=fossgis_osrm_foot&route=53.05393%2C8.79198%3B53.05335%2C8.79139
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:18:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
VLD166 (2022-05-20 18:06:22+00:00): Hello,

I'm concerned with the names you've added. Are they the actual names of these roads? If so, could you please provide any resources you used.

Regards,
Jordan Webster
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:25:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Wilmer Osario (2022-04-25 00:52:06+00:00): ¿Por qué "meow"?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:23:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
osmee333 (2022-04-25 00:01:30+00:00): EDIT: It's NOW Great Hobbies. It is Great Hobbies.
nevw (2022-04-25 02:10:07+00:00): Hi
welcome to OSM. 

The beaches you have placed a point on have already been mapped fully as areas and named so I will delete these.

You have dragged a few points accidentally as is common when using iD. I will fix these.
https://pasteboard.co/b0X5sAAu7GRy.png

The Gosford City Aeromodellers Club should remain as a recreational ground I expect. Aeorodromes are for full sized operational airfields, not models.
Is this area serviced by full sized aircraft or only a model aircraft area?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:aeroway%3Daerodrome

If it is a model aircraft facility, you could 
check how this model airfield is mapped. Under the layers icon at the right side, select the Map Data box to see how parts are tagged.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19%2F-27.27042%2F153.03908
nevw (2022-04-25 02:54:37+00:00): Looking at the Gosford City Aeromodellers Club it seems obviously not an aerodrome so I have changed it back to a recreational ground.
tastrax (2022-04-27 03:47:30+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:27:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:20:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:21:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
snopas24 (2022-04-25 00:07:37+00:00): *pedestrian street
bisonprarieafternoon (2022-04-25 01:44:04+00:00): Hey I would advise against doing this type of clean up here, the person who imported these things with the old landuse tags don't actually correspond to how we use landuse in OSM. So a lot of the farmland and others end up include pasture which would be meadow and stuff considered farmyard. Just changing the tags makes this no better and if not worse, I have been debating just deleting all these as it was a really bad import done over a decade ago
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:33:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:16:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2024-04-20 14:20:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 150265070, 150261530, 150261385, 150261427, 150261374, 150261398, 150261463, 150262164, 150264883, 150261443, 150265293, 150265518, 150263711, 150261692, 150263544, 150263148, 150264695, 150263349, 150262918, 150264472, 150264284, 150261551, 150264090, 150262527, 150262687, 150263890, 150261413, 150261488, 150261509 where the changeset comment is: No reply to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/15936 , so we've taken a guess at what was likely derived from Google Earth (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/149290548 admits to that use)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:24:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
Mortein (2022-05-01 01:33:30+00:00): All but one of these POIs (Aladdin's) are duplicates.

Please consider using an app with more up to date data, such as Organic Maps.
HirschKauz (2022-07-13 12:22:54+00:00): Hi wermak. Ist die Moschee in Quadrath-Ichendorf schon fertig oder warum hast Du "construction" entfernt??
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120142203
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:17:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-05-06 01:19:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 120609049, 120606009 where the changeset comment is: Following a number of reports to the DWG, reverting some data that appears to be copied from Google Maps.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5978 , links from there and previous blocks for more info.