piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-16 22:07:09+00:00): isso esta certo?
VLD549 (2022-09-29 15:06:39+00:00): Hi, could you indicate where BAG displays it as 'Meester' instead of Mr ?
I can only see this: https://bagviewer.kadaster.nl/lvbag/bag-viewer/index.html#?searchQuery=Meester%20S.%20Naaijenstraat&resultOffset=0&detailsObjectId=0874010000002311&objectId=0874200000033483&geometry.x=132754.18009375&geometry.y=421224.55215625&zoomlevel=7
Sander H (2022-09-29 18:37:28+00:00): It's OSM which recommends writing names in full (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Abbreviation_(don't_do_it)) which we try to adhere to.
Some put the official BAG name in the official_name tag.
See also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Name_finder:Abbreviations#Nederlands_-_Dutch
VLD548 (2022-10-07 11:59:17+00:00): I agree with the name written in full. Thank you for the explanation.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-07-19 14:02:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 123808644 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some apparently trolling edits in the Philippines
highflyer74 (2022-07-15 04:45:01+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe eine Frage zur Art des Gebäudes hier: Dort steht jetzt building=retail. Werden dort Waren an den Endkunden verkauft und ist es kein Universitätsgebäude mehr?

Versuche mal zu beschreiben, wie die Lage vor Ort ist.

Danke Dir!
Grickel (2022-07-15 05:42:29+00:00): Dort ist nun eine Firma ansässig. Im wesentlichen Architektur und Immobilien (Prolog).
highflyer74 (2022-07-15 06:46:54+00:00): Hallo und danke für Deine schnelle Antwort!

Das bedeutet, das Gebäude beeinhaltet jetzt nur noch die Firma Prolog und das BIMAQ ist dort nicht mehr? Je nachdem, wie die Lage ist, vermute ich, dass wir da einiges umbauen müssen.

Generell trennen wir meist die Gebäudedaten von dem, was sich in ihm befindet. building=retail sagt lediglich etwas über das Gebäude aus, nicht aber über das, was sich in ihm befindet.

Falls Du uns weiterhin bei OSM unterstützen möchtest, sag gern bescheid, dann schicke ich Dir ein paar Links, welche die grundsätzliche Funktionsweise von OSM erklären.

Viele Grüße!
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-14 19:18:31+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Just a test or what's the source of your mapping activity?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
eggie (2022-07-14 13:31:11+00:00): Eén bollard is voldoende. Waarom een bollard op adresnode nr 10?
motor_vehicle=no os default. We toevoegen moped en mofa=yes (Dat zijn motorvoertuigen in OSM)
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-14 18:53:27+00:00): De accesstags heb ik aangepast. Het paaltje van huis nummer 10 verwijderd. 

MVG
eggie
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-14 19:20:08+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? Thanks. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
wkdgs (2022-07-18 13:01:05+00:00): Hi,

bei Waltrop hast du noch eine Bauernhoffläche bearbeitet, deren Form jetzt etwas komisch aussieht. Kannst du dir die nochmal anschauen?

Mit dem Link unten kannst du dir deine Änderungen anzeigen lassen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123609295
Jacqueline Dudek (2022-07-19 06:12:56+00:00): Hallo, da habe ich mich wohl vertan. Bitte diese Änderung nicht vornehmen.
highflyer74 (2022-07-19 12:22:32+00:00): @Jacqueline Dudek: ich hab's wieder zurückgedreht. Denke daran, dass alle Änderungen, die du vornimmst, sofort in OSM vorhanden sind (es gibt keine Freigabe oder ähnliches).
Enock4seth (2022-07-16 08:03:17+00:00): Thanks for removing all those ghost buildings. Please kindly avoid using OpenStreetMap as a toy box and mapping non-existing features in this manner. 

Also learn to use Good changeset comments that describe what you have actually done, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Happy Mapping
Alifo Ruth (2022-10-14 11:33:25+00:00): Thanks for the corrections. Very much appreciated
Warin61 (2024-04-14 01:54:57+00:00): Hi,
I have changed the relation for the 'glasshouses' to a type = site. This enables the individual buildings to be better tagged - not all the roofs are flat for example.
toledo (2022-10-26 07:14:07+00:00): Ist es neu, dass Velos/Fussgänger/Pferde da nicht mehr durch fürfen?
eggie (2022-07-14 13:28:37+00:00): Dag Joris.. motor_vehicle =no hoeft niet op een barrier=bollard
Waarom motorcar=designated op het noordelijk stuk aan de oostzijde van het paaltje. Dan is dat toch default? 
Gr eggie
eggie (2022-07-14 13:40:37+00:00): Lijkt me oke...  Dat zijn residentials
gr eggie
highflyer74 (2022-07-19 11:49:03+00:00): Moin und willkommen bei OSM!

Ein Hinweis: Änderungen dieser Art führen zu nichts. Ein description=* ist lediglich eine Beschreibung für bestimmte Objekte.

Bevor du weitere Änderungen vornimmst, lies dich bitte in OSM ein, denn es ist komplexer, als es am Anfang aussieht.

Lies dir dazu bitte https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf durch und frage andere Mapper im Forum (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14), wenn du nicht sicher bist, wie man etwas mappt.

Ganz wichtig hier: Sperrungen von Straßen werden nur erfasst, wenn sie sehr lange andauern. Wir reden hier von mehreren Monaten bis Jahren.

Viele Grüße!
highflyer74 (2022-07-19 11:51:29+00:00): Noch vergessen: Einschränkungen für bestimmte Verkehrarten, wie z.B. LKW müssen vor Ort ausgeschildert sein, damit wir sie mappen. Ein subjektives "schwierig zu durchfahren" reicht nicht.
ruzka (2022-07-22 14:10:19+00:00): Czy możesz pisać konkretniejsze opisy zmian? Z komentarza "Aktualizacja" wyciągam tyle, że aż nic xd
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-08-30 21:58:52+00:00): realinhado com camada Sentinel
user_2066394 (2022-07-15 10:15:28+00:00): Der war kurzlebig.
kdkeller (2022-07-15 10:38:15+00:00): Ich hab mir dort vor 1 1/2 Wochen beim Vorbeifahren einen POI in OSMAnd gesetzt und danach eingetragen, aber am Dienstag war dort nichts mehr zu sehen. Hm. Danke für's Aufpassen :-)
RicoElectrico (2022-07-15 11:20:31+00:00): Hej, możesz też dodać przy okazji inne tagi, jak defibrillator:location=*, access=*, indoor=*, opening_hours=*, operator=*.
Namysław Tatarynowicz (2022-07-15 12:16:35+00:00): Jak będę w tej okolicy (a z pewnością będę), to postaram się uzupełnić.
RicoElectrico (2022-07-15 12:28:28+00:00): Dzięki!
eggie (2022-07-14 13:37:27+00:00): Beste VanzantBr

Medemappers willen graag weten wat je hebt aangepast. Gwef dus concreet commentaar. Wanneer een appartementencomplex af is dan ook verwijderen construction=yes
area=yes op zich is helemaal niets. 
Nog een tip.. Geen adressen toevoegen aan gebouwen. Er zijn adresnodes. 
Beter is het om alle info op de adresnode te zetten. Niet op het gebouw en nog een keer fire_station op de adresnode.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-14 13:39:03+00:00): Ik heb de adresnode nu ontdaan van brandweerkazerne. Up to you waar je de info gaat zetten.
MVG
eggie
Reza Babri (2022-07-14 17:23:16+00:00): سلام
لطفا ارتفاع قله ها را در نام قله ذکر نکنید. ارتفاع تگ مخصوص خود را دارد و نباید در عنوان قله ذکر شود. 
همچنین، نام انگلیسی قله باید به حروف انگلیسی نوشته شود. 
مطلب دیگر  اینکه اسم دوم قله نباید عین اسم اولش باشد. اگر قله فقط یک نام  دارد، تگ مربوط به اسم دوم را حذف کنید.

با سپاس
danieldegroot2 (2022-07-15 16:35:11+00:00): 请把 "F**k DWG "部分从你的资料中删除。尊重你的志愿者伙伴/贡献者。这包括DWG。该信息可能被认为是不恰当的，不管你是否审查了一个不恰当的词或打算把它作为一个笑话。

任何人都可以在你的修改集上发表评论，例如询问你所使用的标签是什么意思。这样，其他贡献者可以了解你正在做什么修改，以及你为什么要这样做。
如果你认为一个评论是不恰当的，请向DWG报告。
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I.27ve_seen_a_problem.3B_what_should_I_do.3F

如果你认为你受到了DWG的不公正对待，请参见
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I_feel_that_I_have_been_treated_unfairly_by_DWG

--

Hey 喵耳引力波 ,

Remove the "F**k DWG" section from your profile, please. Respect your fellow volunteers / contributors. This includes the DWG. The message may be considered inappropriate, regardless if you censor an inappropriate word or intend it as a joke.

Anyone can comment on your changeset to for example ask what a tag you are using means. This way, other contributors can understand what changes you are making and why you are making them.
If you think a comment is inappropriate, report it to the DWG;
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I.27ve_seen_a_problem.3B_what_should_I_do.3F

If you think you have been treated unfairly by DWG, see
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Data_Working_Group#I_feel_that_I_have_been_treated_unfairly_by_DWG

Regards,

Daniel
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-15 20:29:07+00:00): Hey Daniel

Thank you for noticing this and talk with me. Actually this is not me treated unfairly by DWG, but the honorable "on the ground" rule unfairly treated by some DWG member.

Thank you for listen this long story.

As we all know, the terrirory disputed area should follow the on the ground rule, no matter which one is seen adjective or evil.

Here are 2 changeset:

+ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111484120
+ https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/111486876

The disputed changeset related on a boundary change between Bhutan-China, in this area a small viliage can been seen on satelite map. This places is now controled by China, if some one search the "Pangda viliage" on google he/she will immediately know everything.

But DWG just "invastigating" and "invastigating", without any result, just let this area locked, and add strange tag: "fixme=What's this".

If something related to China, usually it will cost a long long long period time to handle than other place. Even some DWG member show there injustice about China mapper.

> In a twist to usual OSM rules (“local mappers know best”), in order to give Chinese users the best map, it might be best if citizens of China refrained from editing anything of international interest (including China’s borders) - or really anything their own government might have an opinion on.

This part of quote is from woodpack said in https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/assanges/diary/397559 (Also you can see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ztzthu/diary/397732 , this is a pair of diary). He show the prejudice of seeing every China mapper as a governmental dominated tool person.

I don't think they will give justice about the fact, maybe the fact don't be care at all, them just want to use those changeset to show their aititude about China.

----

Utill the issue handle was taken equal between China and other places, utill they finished the so-called "invastigate" according to currently situation and on the ground fact, I will NOT change my f-word.

Even DWG can block me, can kick me off OSM, but on the ground fact will not change. I respect every mapper contributing in OSM, even they are doing unproper edit or making some mistake, I think this can be handled in a peaceful way. But acted as admin, acted as part of DWG, they, at least those 2 DWG member handle this issue, lost the justice.

If my word is offensive, those admin's inaction and prejudice is also offensive to all hardworking and disciplined China mapper. I can't bare this.

I don't want to larger this to all DWG member, but at least, on this issue, I don't think they right.

That's why I want to FUCK DWG (No cencored, it is FUCK)
喵耳引力波 (2022-07-15 20:30:27+00:00): If you have some method can let this so-called investigate speed fast and make things clearly, I thank you sincerely. ♥
GSF1200S (2024-03-16 01:27:25+00:00): DWG还没“调查”完么？
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-04 12:27:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124478979 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some test edits
WoSoe (2022-07-15 04:26:34+00:00): Der »Übergang« über die Gleise ist aber vorhanden und wird auch genutzt.

Wenn dann müsste das über »access« geregelt werden und nicht durch löschen bzw. Wegunterbrechung.
kukuk (2022-07-15 05:52:31+00:00): Der Weg ist durch das Gleisbett durchtrennt, er endet auf beiden Seiten kurz vorher. Das es Lebensmüde gibt, die an der Stelle verbotenerweise die Gleise überqueren, ändert daran nichts.
conradoos (2022-08-25 13:34:41+00:00): Nazwę myjni należy dodać do myjni ("amenity=car_wash"), a nie do budynku. Poza tym jeżeli jest tam jedna myjnia, to należy oznaczyć ją tylko jeden raz (i jeden raz podać jej nazwę).
conradoos (2022-08-25 13:29:11+00:00): Cześć, parking trzeba oznaczyć poprzez użycie tagu "amenity=parking" na obszarze parkingu, a nie poprzez użycie nazwy w tagu "name".
SomeoneElse (2022-07-19 14:19:26+00:00): Re https://osm.mapki.com/history/way/28571894
For info, I've just reverted some spurious edits by "DRPS PHCA".  Can you check that you haven't removed the "wrong" duplicate here?
Best Regards,
Andy
Baconcrisp (2022-07-19 14:37:28+00:00): I'll check it out and get back to you!

Baconcrisp
Baconcrisp (2022-07-19 15:27:37+00:00): You were correct. I did remove the wrong duplicate feature and just finished re-adding it. Please feel free to double check my work and thank you for bringing this to my attention!

Baconcrisp
SomeoneElse (2022-07-23 16:33:50+00:00): Thanks, and sorry that the reverts of the rubbish that "DRPS PHCA" added were long enough after their addition that other tidying up had been done first.
Baconcrisp (2022-07-26 14:16:05+00:00): It's not a problem at all! I'm happy to help out where I can to keep the data clean and correct!
skquinn (2022-09-10 13:43:27+00:00): Are you sure this is in the right location for the address given? This is nowhere near Reseda Boulevard.
emersonveenstra (2022-07-14 15:26:26+00:00): Are you sure you meant to include a roundabout there? Shouldn't it connect to another road?
EZRouting (2022-07-14 15:36:39+00:00): Hi, we were advised by the local school district that this is the new road path. Based on a quick search, the road looks similar on both Bing and Google, so I believe this path is approximately correct.
EZRouting (2022-07-14 15:39:23+00:00): It is not a roundabout so much as North 28th Street curving off to the left.
emersonveenstra (2022-07-14 15:40:12+00:00): I meant this roundabout: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078526183
EZRouting (2022-07-14 16:00:44+00:00): You're correct, we need to modify East G Avenue to go through the roundabout. North 27th Street also meets Gull Road above the roundabout now. I can make these adjustments.
danieldegroot2 (2022-07-22 20:20:05+00:00): Be aware using any Google, or incompatibly licensed data for your edits is prohibited.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data?

If any of your contributions are based on or derive from such sources, you should work with the Data Working Group to take proper action -ie. reverting them-.
EZRouting (2022-07-22 20:37:30+00:00): Thanks, we are aware not to use Google and Bing.
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2022-07-20 04:54:13+00:00): السلام عليكم أخ يوسف، هذه الأماكن الي أضفتها للخريطة خاصة بك وليست أماكن عامة يستفيد منها الجميع، استخدم ميزة المفضلة في جهازك ولا ترفعها على الخريطة العامة وشكرا لك
BCNorwich (2022-07-14 18:05:48+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

If it's a private or customer car park then it should be tagged as such rather than deleted. 

I've tagged it access=private.

Regards Bernard.
Ken's Corn Stores Ltd (2022-07-18 08:49:06+00:00): Please ensure the "p" for parking is removed so customers do not try to park in this area. Thank you.
BCNorwich (2022-07-18 09:17:18+00:00): Hi, It's a car park, I can see it's a car park, a car park symbol is a "p".

The car park is tagged as private thus I, as a possible customer, would not use it. Further, the service road to it is tagged private, so I would not even attempt to go to the car park.

In most cases, folk don't use a map to find car parks so IMHO a sign at the area would be a better deterrent.

Regards Bernard.
Ken's Corn Stores Ltd (2022-07-18 10:52:36+00:00): Unfortunately, customers DO NOT read signage on our site or choose to ignore it and their reason is it "shows on a map" (private or not) they can walk/drive that way.  The service roads and staff car park area is a working environment with forklift and deliver vehicles hence we need to deter unauthorised access for health & safety reasons.
gscholz (2022-07-19 06:47:39+00:00): Hi MaritzaPg,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways and a misuse of the tag "Motorway". :

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=123613816

I have reverted it to fix those issues. Please educate yourself about how to edit motorways:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway

Kind regards
Guido
user_15552334 (2022-07-17 11:47:14+00:00): .
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123613830
user_15552334 (2022-07-17 18:41:40+00:00): .
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123613830
emersonveenstra (2022-07-14 19:45:50+00:00): Hi,

This doesn't look correct. `highway=unclassified` is for public roads only, and ways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42412502 are not public and therefore are actually service roads. Please look at the wiki definitions for both if you are confused
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123613890
tuttiton (2022-07-17 00:22:42+00:00): Hello,

Yeah I think I did it a bit freely. I see that you already rolled back some of that. I'll revisit this change soon
Highway classification effort
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance
was discussed on the Michigan mappers meeting last Wednesday and I tried to base it on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Michigan
https://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/nfc/#
still some of it is obviously incomplete. but yeah I guess I was too eager doing that.

Thank you for your vigilance
sanchi (2022-07-14 21:25:36+00:00): Sabes que son bienvenidas todas tus ediciones. Pero eso de fardar de editar en mi territorio ya es pasarse. jajajaj
Juanantonaya (2022-07-15 17:28:34+00:00): ;-)

Casi me muero en tu ciudad del calor que hacía.
Encantado de editar por allí.
mavl (2022-11-23 15:19:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 129286500 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poog mapping, the trash data - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6558].
Syl (2022-07-19 11:27:40+00:00): Hello, you forgot to add amenity=vending_machine and 
vending=newspapers.
Nearby0051 (2022-07-18 14:54:12+00:00): Review was requested:

Looks good to me, I have just changed the url to include the https part

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:website?uselang=en

Thanks for your edit :)
rgbimport (2023-10-01 09:51:46+00:00): Las direcciones postales no llevan la clave building, salvo que no haya edificio, en cuyo caso se puede poner. Pero sí hay edificios. Estoy importando los edificios del Catastro en Comillas, así que ya los iré cambiando, pero para que lo tengas en cuenta para el futuro.
Eiim (2022-07-15 02:55:52+00:00): Hi,
Did you see my previous comment? Although I appreciate the contributions, it doesn't appear that the concerns I brought up there have been addressed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123483685.
Supaplex030 (2022-07-14 16:01:24+00:00): Hallo aithebanana,

(Please let me know if you want to write in English :))

du fügst zur Zeit viele Geh- und Radwege in Schöneweide ein, allerdings solltest du dabei einige Sachen beachten, damit diese hinzugefügten Daten "nutzbar" sind und im Rahmen der OSM-Konventionen bleiben.

Bei einem ersten Blick auf deine Änderungen ist mir z.B. aufgefallen, dass du Fahrradstreifen auf Straßen als eigenständige Linie mit highway=cycleway mappst. Das ist in OSM unüblich und aus verschiedenen Gründen in dieser Form problematisch, z.B., weil du die Information des "Radweges" nun doppelt eingetragen hast. Denn die Radweginformationen stehen bereits an der Straßenlinie.

Außerdem fehlen bei den meisten deiner Geh- und Radwege Verbindungen zum Rest des Straßennetzes, wodurch diese Wege nicht für Routing-Software verwendbar sind. Ein paar Hinweise zum Kartieren von Gehwegen kannst du z.B. hier finden: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin/Verkehrswende/Gehwege

Bitte beachte, dass wir bei OSM keine "Karte malen", es also nicht darum geht, dass Wege auf der Karte erscheinen. Das Kartieren von Geh- und Radwegen kann sehr anspruchsvoll sein.

Es ist aber super, dass du aktiv zu OSM beiträgst bzw. beitragen willst! Wenn du Unterstützung dabei benötigst, melde dich gerne (schreib mich einfach an)! Gerade am Anfang kann es schnell mal passieren, dass andere OSM-Mapper sich an solchen Änderungen stören ;)

Liebe Grüße
Alex
felipeeugenio (2022-07-15 15:46:18+00:00): Estimado. por favor revisar lo que significa cada landuse que usa. porque no solo creo que no calza ninguna, si no que además cambia las que están bien por incorrectas.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123615186
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-06 23:33:43+00:00): Cleaned up and replaced SEO name=* and refine other tags for Double E POI in changeset 183759175

https://osm.org/changeset/183759175
Jakka (2022-07-15 09:31:22+00:00): Het wissen van wegen is nooit een goed idee. Zijn ze privé dat zet je de tag access=private op.
Hoe kunnen leveringen, diensten anders daar geraken ?
lees eens deze info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property
felipeeugenio (2022-07-15 15:40:32+00:00): Estás borrando información util solo porque no sabes cuales son los tags que se usan.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123617047
felipeeugenio (2022-07-15 15:39:49+00:00): Esto es highway=milestone y distance=24. No había necesidad de borrarlo si tenía un error.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123617165
emersonveenstra (2022-07-14 19:41:35+00:00): Hi,

Please make sure to double check that all tags from the previous use have been removed. You left the `parking=surface` tag on the basketball court. Would you mind removing that, please? Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123617176
oba510 (2022-07-14 20:42:20+00:00): Hi,

Please don't add nonsense to OSM.  This is a map of the real world used by tons of people.  I have reverted your changeset.

Thank you.
marczoutendijk (2022-07-21 08:51:28+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6149
user_2066394 (2022-07-15 15:49:10+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9887753424
Der Haupteingang kann nach wie vor ein entrance=yes oder eben ein entrance=main vertragen, bzw. man hätte den ursprümglich vorhandenen Knoten einfach ein wenig verschieben können.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1078554546
roof:shape=* und roof.orientation=* werden  noch nacherfasst?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/739119332
Der Gesamtumriss braucht an sich kein building=*

https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/3217994992
Der EuroShop ist umgezogen oder hat es den Knoten verzogen?
Maarten van der Bent (2022-07-14 16:41:50+00:00): The protocol with list of coordinates can be found here: https://www.dna.sr/media/330804/21_1437__Pres._Ch._Santokhi__aanb._overeenkomst_protocol_tussen_Rep._Suriname_en_Franse_Rep._op_de_regeling_van_de_Grens_tussen_Suriname_en_Frans_Guyana_verdrag_parijs_30sept.1915_tot_vaststellen_van_de_Grens.pdf
emersonveenstra (2022-07-14 16:48:17+00:00): Looks like you missed deleting this traffic light? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/184810190
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123617565
EZRouting (2022-07-14 16:50:37+00:00): I noticed that as well, but I was not able to verify if there is no longer a traffic light.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-15 00:12:11+00:00): Hello Heval, the offical English name in Iraq is Sulaymaniyah, you can add Slemani as an alt_name but not name:en       
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulaymaniyah