piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
arcth (2017-09-28 23:41:14+00:00): The address system in Latvia is defined by the Address Regulations[1] based on the Administrative Territories and Populated Areas law[2]. Adresses are assigned by municipal government and kept in the State Address Register[3] which is the source of addresses shown at kadastrs.lv, geolatvija.lv etc.

As specified in [1], an address must have either a house name or a street and a number. Since there are no officially named streets in most hamlets of Saulkrati parish, properties there have house names consisting of a hamlet name and a number. These house names were assigned by the Saulkrasi municipality council resolution[4] on 30.06.2010, paragraphs 26--39.

In the OSM wiki article on disputes there is a section[5] regarding the On the Ground Rule which suggests using an official source of names if available. Probably this also applies to addresses.

[1] https://m.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=278402
[2] https://m.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=185993
[3] http://www.vzd.gov.lv/lv/par-mums/darbibas-jomas/adresu-registrs/
[4] http://saulkrasti.lv/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/aA4_www_30-06-2010.doc
[5] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Disputes#On_the_Ground_Rule
HellMap (2017-09-29 12:12:40+00:00): I can see from your links that "Hamlet Xx" is the official property name and first part of the official address.

But I am not sure I agree that we should map it this way. On the Ground Rule says "whatever [..] used by the people on the ground", which is what my previous reply was about -- on the ground, you see house plates with numbers, prominent numbers with extra info, and almost never "Hamlet Xxx". I would argue that, intuitively, anyone looking for addresses would look for the numbered part. After all, that's what's actually on the ground and that's what local hamlet maps are like.[1] (In fact, some have an additional local street name and number, which isn't official and doesn't even appear in kadastrs.)

The Addresses guideline about addresses with no street names mentions "in small villages the address may be just the village name and the name or number of the house".[2] It seems a reasonable way to map it for rendering and routing software.

I can say from surveying and looking at the map that having house names for each address is illegible and numbers are much more readable. Many names don't even render, because there's no space for them. Often they overlap the streets and nearby features.

I guess the question is how strictly OSM should follow the official name. I don't mind listing it in addr2: (though I don't think there's a way to mark address as "official" versus "on the ground"). But I'm not sure we should list the property names as the first addr:. After all, so many features on the ground do not match what the official sources claim.

[1] https://imgur.com/a/rhrgL
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Addresses#Addresses_without_street_names
eggie (2017-09-11 07:32:18+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd.
Øukasz (2017-09-13 21:10:21+00:00): deleted a locality and recreated a village instead of changing the tag
Carto'Cité (2018-11-26 16:00:34+00:00): Salut José,
Sur la route https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23065760 tu as mis cycleway=opposite_lane mais sur les photos récentes de l'IGN on dirait bien que la bande cyclable v
Carto'Cité (2018-11-26 16:01:06+00:00): Salut José,
Sur la route https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23065760 tu as mis cycleway=opposite_lane mais sur les photos récentes de l'IGN on dirait bien que la bande cyclable va dans le même sens que le sens unique.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIDF
josmougn (2018-11-27 00:35:29+00:00): salut Charles, oui je confirme le DSC. La photo IGN est peut être un peu ancienne. https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/boTcYIIzwrHWR1uBfRW5nA
Carto'Cité (2018-11-27 17:51:03+00:00): Ok merci pour ton retour.
eggie (2017-09-08 06:15:33+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
Aleks-Berlin (2017-09-08 07:14:53+00:00): Hi futurumspes, please be more careful. you entered "motorway=" = .. (2x operator sign).
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/160489462/history
This happened many times during last month. Please take care.
Thanks a lot, Alex
Superadlen (2017-09-08 11:50:42+00:00): ok
GinaroZ (2017-09-11 21:42:11+00:00): Hi, thanks for the edit and welcome to OSM. I've moved the "Core Path" name to the designation tag, as I assume that's not the actual name of the path?
faifley community council (2017-09-20 15:04:14+00:00): its part of paths that run through west dunbarton 

http://www.west-dunbarton.gov.uk/leisure-parks-events/countryside-facilities-and-wildlife/countryside-and-leisure/core-paths/core-paths-plan/
Carnildo (2017-09-08 03:48:11+00:00): When adding building names, it helps if you also add the buildings, or at least indicate that the points you're adding *are* buildings.  I've traced three of them, but Delta Delta Delta and Delta Sigma Phi don't clearly correspond to buildings.
jessbeutler (2017-09-08 04:53:10+00:00): Hi Carnildo, thanks for the comment. I add these names on my Go Map!! app as I walk around and then add the buildings when I get back onto OSM later in the day.
Carnildo (2017-09-08 16:42:45+00:00): Does Go Map!! have a way of adding "building=yes" or similar when you're adding the name?  Doing that would make it obvious that adding a standalone name wasn't a mistake.
TagaSanPedroAko (2017-09-16 17:23:48+00:00): You look like you hidden the LRT-2 from the map view. I'll be reverting the retagging you did.

Mukhang itinago mo mula sa mapa ang linya ng LRT-2. Ibabalik ko ang mga ito sa mga dating tag.
aharvey (2017-09-12 00:12:55+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM!

In case you didn't realise you've saved your changes in the live OSM database.

In this case, the park is already mapped out so I've removed the empty way you created.
user_5359 (2017-09-10 14:26:33+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.

If you need help: You are welcome!
skquinn (2017-09-08 02:42:26+00:00): This was actually mapped from Texas Orthophoto, I forgot to update the source before uploiading.
raito (2017-09-13 07:03:32+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap! Selamat Datang ke OpenStreetMap!

If you haven't noticed yet, you should not have added your GPX tracks as data from the editor. They should be added as GPS traces here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/trace/create

I have fixed edits in both your 2 changesets here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51994355 

Cheers!
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:05:23+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
mueschel (2017-09-22 11:21:41+00:00): Hi,
could you give some details on this restriction? "except = Transit vehicle" is not a common tag, and there is a stray ':' in 'restriction'.
Who is allowed to turn here?

Jan
Iqhra (2017-09-29 11:27:14+00:00): Hi Jan, 
Thanks for getting back  I have been adding the restriction using street level imagery and the board below is stating that it is not allowed to take u turn except transit vehicles. So I went ahead and tagged them following what I see what I map. It would be great if local knowledge mappers like you can go ahead and make the changes if needed. 

Regards
Iqhra
mueschel (2017-09-29 11:49:29+00:00): Hi,
thanks for replying. That is 'transit' as in 'public transit'? (Sorry, I'm not from the US and don't know terminology..). That would be "except = bus", which is buses used in public transit, but not coaches. 
Jan
Iqhra (2017-10-01 07:43:06+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for getting back. I tagged it based on the sign board i see in the street level imagery ( even I am not form US). It would be great if you can go ahead and make changes as per your knowledge if it needs any correction.
regards,
Iqhra
chihchun (2017-09-08 05:00:13+00:00): 請注意野外無廁所建築，亦非官方建議便溺場所。
chihchun (2017-09-08 05:03:20+00:00): 小溪營地在太魯閣國家公園區域外。http://forbiddenland.basecamp.tw/#11/24.1959/121.2654
bergaufsee (2017-09-10 20:27:39+00:00): Hat der Friseur tatsächlich die Hausnummer 3? Es sieht hier so aus als ob auf einer Straßenseite die ungeraden und auf der anderen die geraden sind. Diese Frage war der Hintergrund des fixme ;)
KaiPankrath (2017-09-17 07:41:30+00:00): Stimmt, anhand der Webseite des Shops verifiziert und korrigiert.
Carnildo (2017-09-08 05:29:48+00:00): This bridge is straight.  It only appears bent in the imagery because of bad orthorectification.
ashleyannmathew (2017-09-28 10:22:39+00:00): Thanks for pointing it out and correcting the same.
user_5359 (2017-09-08 18:05:21+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I must deleted you node, because you aren’t a church and the node isn’t well placed. Don’t use the geocoder from Google (Google don’t allow this), look on the aerial image and mark the right building!
eggie (2017-09-08 08:03:29+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-08 08:07:12+00:00): Footway=sidewalk kan eraf. Dat is een vervelende bug in editor iD.
Haal je het eraf?
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=51832355
Graag reactie
eggie (2017-09-08 08:09:14+00:00): Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 
In Nederland is Leisure=park geen landuse. 
Graag de landuse eerst invullen en bij een park de Leisure (functie dus) er los met naam overheen leggen.
Graag reactie..
eggie (2017-09-08 11:38:47+00:00): Een stukje heb ik voor je ingevuld. Niet elk stukje groen is een park. Leisure park is de functie.. landuse=grass en natural=tree  is wat je daadwerkelijk ziet.
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
iorant (2017-10-03 11:10:43+00:00): А це точно тазва ресторану?
iorant (2017-10-03 11:21:35+00:00): *назва
Supaplex (2017-10-02 11:05:56+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
GerdP (2017-09-09 05:29:07+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
Why did you change contstruction=rail to highway=rail ? 
When construction is finished you can simply remove the construction tag.
mueschel (2017-09-22 11:31:45+00:00): Hi,
could you check the leaf_type and leef_type tags here? 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/522360942
Jan
PlaneMad (2017-09-11 13:12:01+00:00): This looks a little misaligned from the imagery, please check if its correct.
Warin61 (2017-09-10 21:53:30+00:00): Hi,
Not well done every where... 
Ways 208505436 361107918 422926793 432708439 show up in OSMinspector .with elf intersections. There maybe others of this changeset that need looking at. I have done one, but leave the rest so you can see what has occurred.
tastrax (2017-09-10 22:32:40+00:00): Hi Warin61 - I am not seeing any issues in OSM Inspector?
tastrax (2017-09-10 22:47:11+00:00): Actually just my dodgey connection - I think they are all fixed now
mueschel (2017-09-08 19:50:28+00:00): Hi,
anstelle den Knoten zu löschen, kannst du ihn auch stehen lassen. Für leerstehende Läden haben wir den Tag "shop = vacant". Wenn die Gefahr besteht, dass andere die Schließung nicht mitbekommen haben und den POI wieder hinzufügen könnten - setz noch eine note=... dazu.
Gruß, Jan
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-08 08:00:15+00:00): Proponowałbym raczej zerknąć na disambigi na https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/Polska.html (dodawanie tagu wikipedia tam gdzie jest już tag wikipedia:en będzie dla bota proste, disambigi potrzebują ludzi)
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-08 08:00:58+00:00): Chodzi o przypadki typu http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/31887444 (kliknij na link do wikipedii by zobaczyć problem)
wmyrda (2017-09-08 09:18:48+00:00): Trzecią grupę poprawiłem http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51837264#map=9/49.8413/20.1268 . Tam rzeczywiście żaden automat tego poprawnie nie zrobi. Z tej grupy zostało praktycznie kilka pojedynczych obiektów jak osiedle/dzielnica Obóz w Oświęcimiu. Nie miałem pomysłu co tam przypisać, gdyż nic na wiki nie znalazłem. Góra Przysłop też nie miała artykułu. Wszystkie odnośniki wskazywały na przełęcze.
Dawać następne ;)
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-08 12:54:12+00:00): https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/Polska.html powinno mieć następne :)
wmyrda (2017-09-08 13:56:30+00:00): raptem 5 obiektów było http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51845035 zrobione.
Kolejna grupa jest jakaś dziwna, gdyż krzyczy np. że centrum żydowskie to serial telewizyjny..
"article linked in wikipedia tag is about a television series, so it is very unlikely to be correct (subject:wikipedia=* tag would be probably better - in case of change remember to remove wikidata tag if it is present) [base_type_id: Q5398426]
OSM element with broken tag that should be fixed
pl:Centrum Żydowskie w Oświęcimiu -> ? "
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-09 07:34:45+00:00): Program zgłupiał bo do klasyfikacji używa Wikidata - a tam był bubel, komuś się źle kliknęło przy dodawaniu typu obiektu (już poprawiłem https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q9186556&diff=554058116&oldid=175775587 )

Puszczam generacje nowej wersji raportów.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-09 13:32:41+00:00): https://matkoniecz.github.io/OSM-wikipedia-tag-validator-reports/Polska.html ma nowe dane :)
wmyrda (2017-09-09 20:47:42+00:00): stronkę mam otwartą i raz na jakiś czas daję tam F5 i zauważyłem, że linki do wyjaśnienia są na cały kraj. Ściana wschodnia poprawiona. powoli do przodu :>
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-10 06:11:23+00:00): Tak, w tym momencie jest już tam przerobiona cała Polska.

Jeśli się pojawi chętny na korzystanie z tych danych mogę wrzucić więcej obszarów.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 09:09:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52724341 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit by nyuriks: Removal of wikidata=* and wikipedia=* from ways if a relation had the keys, too. See discusission of changeset 51798382 for more information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 09:09:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52724341 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit by nyuriks: Removal of wikidata=* and wikipedia=* from ways if a relation had the keys, too. See discusission of changeset 51798382 for more information.
eggie (2017-09-08 08:12:06+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
eggie (2017-09-08 08:17:59+00:00): Een gebouw heeft geen eigen adres. Dat staat al op de adresgegevens. 
Ik zal de straatnaam verwijderen.
Probeer het commentaar aan te passen aan je werkelijke edits. Succes verder.
eggie (2017-09-08 08:21:57+00:00): Nogmaals.. geen adresgegevens toevoegen aan het bouwwerkzelf. Die staan al op de adresnodes. Ik verwijder de dubbele adresgegevens

Graag reactie.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?
eggie (2017-09-08 08:23:45+00:00): Reverted
Jozeft (2017-09-08 08:26:52+00:00): Dank. Nieuw in deze omgeving.
eggie (2017-09-08 09:19:00+00:00): Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
Probeer ook het commentaar aan te passen. Nu staat het commentaar van Ho-tosm er nog boven.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 09:09:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52724341 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit by nyuriks: Removal of wikidata=* and wikipedia=* from ways if a relation had the keys, too. See discusission of changeset 51798382 for more information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 09:08:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52724341 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit by nyuriks: Removal of wikidata=* and wikipedia=* from ways if a relation had the keys, too. See discusission of changeset 51798382 for more information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 09:08:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52724341 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit by nyuriks: Removal of wikidata=* and wikipedia=* from ways if a relation had the keys, too. See discusission of changeset 51798382 for more information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 09:08:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52724341 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit by nyuriks: Removal of wikidata=* and wikipedia=* from ways if a relation had the keys, too. See discusission of changeset 51798382 for more information.
dieterdreist (2019-05-16 16:17:52+00:00): Ciao Michele, ho solo ora visto che hai rimosso ref=GRA e messo A90, ma questo ref era già lì nella chiave official_ref, avevamo lasciato GRA perchè la segnaletica continua a indicare GRA.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/51835249
dieterdreist (2021-02-10 08:52:09+00:00): Nessuna risposta. Rinnovo la richiesta, che senso ha ripetere "A90" due volte e far sparire "GRA", il quale ancora ad oggi si trova nel territorio? Ti chiederei gentilmente di rimettere ref=GRA per il GRA, in quanto questo è la dicitura che si trova sui cartelli.
Grazie,
Martin
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 09:08:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52724341 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit by nyuriks: Removal of wikidata=* and wikipedia=* from ways if a relation had the keys, too. See discusission of changeset 51798382 for more information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 09:08:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52724341 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit by nyuriks: Removal of wikidata=* and wikipedia=* from ways if a relation had the keys, too. See discusission of changeset 51798382 for more information.
Nakaner-repair (2017-10-08 09:08:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 52724341 where the changeset comment is: Revert undiscussed mechanical edit by nyuriks: Removal of wikidata=* and wikipedia=* from ways if a relation had the keys, too. See discusission of changeset 51798382 for more information.
user_5359 (2017-09-08 17:56:48+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Die Innenstand von Remscheid ist zu größtenteils schon als landuse=residential gekennzeichnet. Die vorhandene Kennzeichnung ist genauer, da die Einkaufsstraße als commerical (hellrosa) gekennzeichnet sind.

Ich habe deshalb Dein Eintrag als Dublette gelöscht.
Mateusz Konieczny (2017-09-08 12:36:32+00:00): In this case wikipedia and wikidata link is wrong - en:McDonald's is not about this bar, it is about McDonald's in general.

If you want you may add brand:wikipedia and brand:wikidata tags (I fixed it here).
DaveF (2017-09-08 12:21:27+00:00): Hi Claire Welcome to OSM

I assume this is meant to be a bench not a gate as well?
int_ua (2017-09-24 09:16:04+00:00): Печерська кудись далеко переміщена
nyuriks (2017-09-24 16:43:48+00:00): I think you have the wrong changeset. This changset did not move any objects. I see you already fixed Pechers'ka.
GerdP (2017-09-09 05:40:42+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM!
You changed a lot of complex relations here
so that they have no tags. I assume that was not intended?
GerdP (2017-09-09 06:49:20+00:00): I've reverted the changes to the relations, see
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51870499
GerdP (2017-09-09 07:21:32+00:00): I've also managed to restore the tags of most of the other objects, see  https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51870822
GerdP (2017-09-09 09:24:50+00:00): I think I was able to restore most of the data deleted data, so I hope the remaining damage is very small :-)
GerdP (2017-09-09 09:05:15+00:00): I've restored the wetland way 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/376234910
(you accidentially removed the tags before
in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51836900)
I am not sure if you removed this bridge
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/362580439/history
accidentially or not?
GerdP (2017-09-09 09:10:50+00:00): See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51872135
and 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/51873009
dieterdreist (2021-03-31 11:45:18+00:00): Ciao Michele, ho visto soltanto adesso che hai rimosso la sigla "GRA" dal GRA (ref). In questo modo, "GRA" non si trova più con la ricerca e non si vede da nessuna parte della mappa, solo nella realtà della segnaletica.
Il ref "ufficiale" "A90" era già presente in OSM nel tag official_ref=A90, mentre il ref=GRA è quello più utile e reale, perché si trova sui cartelli stradali. Ti chiedo gentilmente di sistemare il GRA e di rimettere ref=GRA. Grazie,
Martin
SomeoneElse (2017-11-19 09:21:30+00:00): The wikidata entry for https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/255467667 looks wrong to me.  The link is to the wikidata entry for the character, not to the statue itself.
nyuriks (2017-11-20 20:59:17+00:00): Agree. This is part of the wp/wd -> subject:wp/wd, or artist:*, or several other ones. Specifically for the fictional characters, most likely its a subject.  I have made a task for this - please click "save" on it if you agree.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Wikipedia_Link_Improvement_Project#Linking_to_Fictional_Humans
SomeoneElse (2017-11-20 22:56:01+00:00): Er - I've no idea why you're saying 'please click "save" on it if you agree'.  If you've added a wikidata tag in error (as appears to be the case here) just remove it.  There is no need to have "made a task for this".
literan (2017-09-08 13:16:41+00:00): Здравствуйте, спасибо вам за правки! Маленькое замечание - точка камеры-радара обязательно должна быть частью линии дороги (а не стоять рядом с ней) - только тогда она будет учитываться навигаторами, и о ней будет предупреждать. Я поправлю. И еще - если вы бываете в тех местах, посмотрите, пожалуйста, насколько корректно отрисована Щелковка в Москве после ркеконструкции. Я немного поправил там по данным с форума roads.ru, но т.к. никогда не бывал там, мне сложно. Местных мапперов, которые правили бы дороги, в том районе не видно
Aspid (2017-09-08 14:08:08+00:00): Здравствуйте! Спасибо за совет!
Шоссе уточнил, то что помню. Снимок очень старый, а по утрам я еду по другому  маршруту, а ночью почти не видно ничего. В целом отрисовано верно.
gormur (2017-09-08 10:21:34+00:00): Welcome to openstreetmap :)
You requested a review on your change, so here it is:
To start, your changeset comment is very good :)
You changed a building=yes to building=Schuur. I guess Schuur is the dutch word for shed?
I think then maybe building=shed would be a better choice as most tags should be in english and lowercase.

best regards
eggie (2017-09-08 11:43:03+00:00): PB gestuurd met welkom.. Lees je goed in.
Wanneer je vragen hebt stel ze gerust.
Probeer te reageren op opmerkingen in de changesets.
Joeysven (2017-09-08 11:47:09+00:00): Hartelijk dank voor de info! Ik heb al een paar wijzigingen bij mij in de buurt gemaakt die niet klopten. Ik zal zeer zorgvuldig te werk gaan.
eggie (2017-09-08 11:52:50+00:00): 'k Ben er een paar doorgelopen. Je bent serieus bezig. Goede zaak. Verander nog even die schuur in yes of shed.
Verder alleen de adresnodes gebruiken voor shops e.d. Kijk ook op het forum.. daar kun je ook vragen kwijt.
Je kunt je voorstellen onder het draadje welkom.
Joeysven (2017-09-08 11:56:28+00:00): Ok, heb schuur veranderd in shed. Ik zal zeker gaan kijken op het forum. Dank voor je hulp!
Joeysven (2017-09-08 11:59:19+00:00): Nog even een snel vraagje. Ik zie een paar winkels die niet meer bestaan. Kan ik die dan verwijderen e/o veranderen?