piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
emilja0308 (2016-02-08 15:38:34+00:00): to może powiem inaczej mieszkam od 25 lat w Bukowcu Wielkim oraz w tej gminie i wiem że Bukowiec Mały jest po dwóch stronach ulicy natomiast Bukowiec Wielki jest pomiędzy Piotrkowowem a Waśniewem. Jeśli byłoby inaczej miałabym błąd w dowodzie
maraf24 (2016-02-08 16:20:25+00:00): Ale teraz się wszystko zgadza, prawda?
maxerickson (2016-03-30 18:59:22+00:00): Hi-

Just a couple of pointers for when you are adding sidewalks:

They should intersect with any streets where they cross in traffic (so not bridges), this helps route finding software use the data (most implementations look for an explicit connection). It's not urgent to fix them all up, but they are quite a bit more useful when they are correctly connected to everything.

It's also probably reasonable to keep the sidewalks a bit shorter. Something like splitting them at the mile roads would be a good rule of thumb. This just makes it easier to deal with in future edits, and makes it easier to analyze changes. Another good place to split them is at bridges. Marking the bridges isn't real important for using the data, but it helps error checking tools by making it clear that the sidewalk should not be connected to the road).

Thanks,

Max
FahRadler (2016-02-13 17:32:57+00:00): ich habe die tag auf den bereits 2013 getaggten Bunker 13m westlich (ist ja wohl der Gleiche) übertragen.
Auch hier wieder : bitte die Quelle angeben dass er zw. 39 u 43 erbaut wurde
Auch bitte eine Quelle dass US-Army gesprengt hat.
Rusleykcruz (2016-02-11 12:02:13+00:00): Olá amigo, bem vindo ao projeto! Quando for nomear ruas selecione a linha que corresponde toda rua e não o ponto. Vou arrumar, qualquer dúvida entre em contato.
smaprs (2017-05-07 18:29:38+00:00): Já tava escrito o nome da rua, não?
Supaplex (2016-02-07 07:54:32+00:00): 台南大學附屬高中實習農場設amenity=school會連同附中搜出兩個學校，應該仿台大農場的處理方式，landuse=farm, operator=台南大學附設中學
maraf24 (2016-02-07 14:36:25+00:00): A jakie są źródła dla nazw tych wszystkich szczytów? Nawet na skanie mapy z geoportalu ich nie ma.
MCalaOSM (2016-02-06 17:21:38+00:00): Dimenticavo aggiunto Chiesa
atpl_pilot (2016-02-07 08:46:37+00:00): Auch das ist falsch getagt
marcioaguiar (2016-03-03 17:38:54+00:00): Olá, Cláudio.

Porque você alterou o bairro Feitosa para Loteamento Bariloche?
Claudioufo (2016-03-03 18:08:08+00:00): A modificação não foi no Bairro. a Região administrativa continua Feitosa. A modificação foi realizada no TAG, ou como listado no original do OpenStreetMaps, Borough que podemos traduzir como Vila.
Se você verificar este marcador, ele faz parte da região administrativa do Feitosa, ou seja, esta incluído no Bairro Feitosa é um objeto do Bairro. Estes marcadores podem ser adicionados também para o Conjunto Antonio Carlos Magalhaes, por exemplo, que fica ao norte da Rua Joel Vieira dos Anjos.
marcioaguiar (2016-03-03 20:51:32+00:00): Então acho que você se enganou. Se você verificar o nó que você alterou [1], ele possui a tag place=suburb e faz parte da relação Feitosa como admin_centre [2]. Ou seja, ele é centro administrativo do bairro e onde é renderizado o nome do mesmo no mapa. Ele já se chamava Feitosa como você pode ver no histórico e acho que, por engano, você alterou para Loteamento Bariloche. Eu já desfiz a alteração. Acredito que o loteamento deva ser marcado como uma área residencial.

[1] http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3357854474
[2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary
Claudioufo (2016-03-03 21:05:54+00:00): Não foi por engano! Este TAG em questão não é um Boundary ou Neighborhood e sim um 'Borough'.
no Wiki é encontrado como Suburb.
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place%3Dsuburb
marcioaguiar (2016-03-03 21:41:27+00:00): Claudio,

1. Não temos o conceito de Brough no Brasil. No Brasil a tag place=suburb é utilizada para mapear bairros. [1]
2. Você alterou um mapeamento do bairro do Feitosa, representado por uma relação [2], que contém como centro o nó que você modificou o nome para "Loteamento Bariloche". Isso fez com que fosse renderizado Loteamento Bariloche no lugar de Feitosa. Você pode ver claramente sua alteração no achavi [3]
3. Se quiser mapear o loteamento, crie a área ou nó específico para o mesmo. Não precisa alterar um nó já existente, principalmente um que já mapeia algo importante como um bairro.
4. Insisto que o loteamento não deve ser mapeado como place=suburb. Nesse caso você o está colocando no mesmo nível administrativo dos bairros, o que não é verdadeiro nesse caso.

[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary%3Dadministrative
[2] http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/400623
[3] https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=37045733
GerdP (2016-02-07 08:53:56+00:00): Moin. Du hast hier die Wege mit 
ref=St 2382 von highway=tertiary auf
das unübliche highway=minor geändert. Macht aus meiner Sicht keinen Sinn. War das Absicht?
maraf24 (2016-02-07 20:12:30+00:00): Hydrant jako toaleta? Chyba jednak nie.
Vort (2016-02-09 09:13:41+00:00): Добрый день.
Спасибо за дополнения.
Возник такой вопрос:
У отрезка вея 396438725, пересекающего реку, разве не должен стоять тег моста?
deathDEN (2016-02-11 17:38:37+00:00): Добрый день. 


Спасибо за уточнение. Действительно пропустил тег. Хотя при этом наверняка на навигаторе будут отображаться три моста, хотя по факту он там всего лишь один :) Ведь вэй как бы в виде тротуара.

P.S. Пользуясь моментом, так же выражаю Вам благодарность за правки на OSM.
naoliv (2016-02-20 06:17:42+00:00): Rafael, não criei proibições de retorno quando a via de origem e destino são iguais (isto é, criar uma proibição de retornar na própria rua).
Isso é desnecessário e errado.
rafaelmoredo10 (2016-02-20 09:55:10+00:00): Estou a penas passando ao OSM o que a sinalização do local indica. Nela há um "mini canteiro central" e em seu término há a sinalização de restrição de retorno, mas ok.
naoliv (2016-02-20 12:56:10+00:00): Seria uma "ilha" esse local? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:traffic_calming%3Disland
Se for esse o caso então, realmente, faz sentido ter a restrição.
rafaelmoredo10 (2016-02-23 20:24:09+00:00): Sim. Há uma ilha.
Polarbear (2016-02-13 00:43:46+00:00): Hi, it would be recommended to use the BrE spelling community_centre. You might also add the type of the centre, and a potential target group, if applicable, see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:community_centre

Please use the full street name on the addr:street tag, and not an abbrevation.
johnny_1982 (2016-02-29 01:06:04+00:00): Ein Teil des "Kerschensteinerweg" wurde umbenannt in "Kerschensteiner Weg". Ist das so korrekt? Alle Wegsegmente sollten gleich heißen. Ich denke die alte Schreibweise ist korrekt. (Gefunden via regio-osm.de)
Mecki (2016-02-29 18:08:34+00:00): korrigiert
Adam_Piszczek (2016-02-07 21:42:10+00:00): ja znam
Martin Borsje (2016-03-04 17:12:18+00:00): Seat Ibiza,

Waarom heb je landuse=residential hier weggehaald?
maraf24 (2016-02-07 14:51:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198142458
Zrobili nowe tory?
maraf24 (2016-02-07 14:52:55+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/394410902
To jest podjazd pod dom, on nie ma nazwy.
GerdP (2016-02-07 09:08:16+00:00): Hi there!
I've changed a few ways with highway=paved or highway=unpaved to 
highway=residential and surface=paved/unpaved. 
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
OK?
Ben L (2016-02-07 13:08:59+00:00): Thank you, I understand now.
GerdP (2016-02-07 13:10:07+00:00): Fine, thanks for the feedback :-)
maraf24 (2016-02-07 20:33:33+00:00): W komentarzu jest podane 118.5m. Jaka więc ma być wysokość?
Pozycję nieco skorygowałem. Jakie jest źródło dla nazwy i wysokości?
Maximus_70 (2016-02-07 20:41:32+00:00): Dziękuję! Szukam góry z Niemiecka zwanej ...Bahlenberg.
W sumie powinno być tak:
..."Góra Chełmska – wał moreny czołowej[1] na Pobrzeżu Koszalińskim, położony w województwie zachodniopomorskim, w granicach miasta Koszalina.
Najwyższe wzgórze Góry Chełmskiej – Krzyżanka ma wysokość 136,2 m n.p.m., Krzywogóra – 133,0 n.p.m., Leśnica – 118,5 m n.p.m., Lisica – 25,9 m n.p.m."...
maraf24 (2016-02-07 20:32:19+00:00): 1. Nie w tym miejscu.
2. Skąd taka wartość wysokości? Na mapie widzę, że powinna mieć 30+ metrów.
trigpoint (2016-02-06 21:02:51+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.

Changes covering such a wide area are frowned upon by the community as it makes it difficult to follow changes made. If mapping different areas please save your work from.one before working on the other.
Thanks Phil
flohoff (2016-02-07 08:07:09+00:00): Hi,
du hast in diesem Changeset Gebäude basierend auf den Luftbildern von Bing korrigiert. Das ist keine gute Idee. In NRW dürfen wir die amtlichen Katasterdaten ALKIS verwenden und die allermeisten Gebäude sind daraus übernommen - semi-automatisch. Wenn du dich jetzt nach dem Luftbild Korrigierst sind die Falsch. Das Luftbild hat immer einen deutlich höheren Lagefehler als die Luftbilder.
Wenn du das ALKIS verwenden willst solltest du dir JOSM den Java editor installieren. Da kannst du dir das danhinter einblenbden.

Flo
trigpoint (2016-02-07 02:14:45+00:00): Wales is a big place, please can you be more descriptive with your comments and respond to changeset comments amde by the UK community.
maraf24 (2016-02-07 14:55:15+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299926483
Dlaczego kasujesz chodniki?
maraf24 (2016-02-08 21:20:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/299926483/history
Ponawiam pytanie.
GerdP (2016-02-07 08:40:15+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM!
I've noticed that you mapped a few ways as highway=track (or highway=tracks) in this area. Please note that highway=track means that the way is "for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks etc"
see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway
I've changed those ways that I found to highway=footway, see 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/37055255
flohoff (2016-02-07 08:10:48+00:00): Hi,
mal abgesehewn von dem Changeset kommentar der null weiterhilft ist hier einiges Krumm. Du hast auf diversen Gebäuden das building=yes entfernt und durch man_made=works ersetzt. Das ist kein Ersatz. Das building=yes sollte bleiben das das eben Gebäude sind.

Dann hast du auf einer schule den Umring mit "amenity=school" gelöscht. Warum? Existiert die Schule nicht mehr? Es ist vollkommen wichtig das das amenity=school auf einer Gesamtfläche der Gebäude und Schulhof etc ist.

Flo
Hartmut Holzgraefe (2016-02-07 12:08:33+00:00): zu man_made=works: "Draw a polygon around the whole area of the production site and tag accordingly. If you want to get detailed you can also add the single components inside the area and tag them as what they are."

D.h. wenn dann hätte man statt des man_made=works Tags auf dem Gestamp-Gelände (ehem. Thyssen Umformtechnik) den Umriss des Werksgeländes so taggen können.

Aber *nicht* die einzelnen Werksgebäude.

Effekt jetzt: bis auf ein wohl vergessenes Kleingebäude und die Gleisanschlüsse und die Durchfahrt von der Gotenstraße zu "Am Perßwerk" ist das Werksgelände nun auf den Openstreetmap.org Kacheln "leer"

flohoff: ich denke hier wäre ein Revert angesagt? Das alles von Hand wieder richtig zu rücken wäre mir zu aufwändig und fehlerträchtig ...
flohoff (2016-02-07 15:31:06+00:00): Ich habe den erstmal reverted. Ist ja der einhelligen Meinung nach falsches tagging.
Antonio Pozza (2016-02-07 14:46:35+00:00): Sentierino che sale dalla Valle delle Tolfe verso Contrà False
TZorn (2016-02-12 16:48:32+00:00): Hallo M_Kucha, ich begrüße es sehr, dass du dazu beiträgst, die Hausnummernwüste zu beseitigen. Allerdings gehst du dabei nicht zimperlich vor und zerstörst wertvolle Informationen. Es scheint mir, du zeichnest entgegen deinem Änderungskommentar ("survey") blind von ALKIS ab, ohne der Realität genügend Rechnung zu tragen. Ich habe hier in der Gegend erst vor wenigen Wochen noch ettliche Straßenzüge nach Besichtigung und hochauflösenden Luftbildern korrigiert und ergänzt. Einiges davon hast du jetzt wieder zu Nichte gemacht: Gebäudegeometrien, die in ALKIS nicht stimmen, zum Falschen geändert, Eingänge gelöscht, building passages gelöscht, building=appartments zu nem simplen building=yes geändert etc.
Bitte verlass dich nicht auf ALKIS alleine, das ist keine Bibel. Ich schaue, ob ich deine Verschlimmbesserungen gezielt revertieren kann, ansonsten muss der ganze Changeset rückgängig gemacht werden.
Dakon (2016-08-15 19:27:12+00:00): JOSM gibt seit August 2015 die Warnung "Sh light signals cannot display Sh0, but only Hp0" wenn die OpenRailwayMap-Regeln installiert sind.
SKald (2017-05-12 10:44:34+00:00): Interessehalber, was ist die Quelle für die Benamung des Gedenksteins unterhalb vom Weissen Hof?
fkv (2017-05-12 21:54:40+00:00): Meinst du das Kagelbauer-Denkmal (node 2639133094)? Jetzt, wo ich mir meine Fotos nochmal ansehe, merke ich, dass ich mich verlesen habe. Der Name lautet richtig Kagerbauer statt Kagelbauer. Und zwar steht auf dem Stein: "R. Kagerbauer stud. jur. 24. Februar 1867 Corps Saxonia". Ich verstehe das so, dass er an diesem Tag als Soldat starb - obwohl es damals keine Wehrpflicht und (ich glaube) auch keine Schlacht gab (Königgrätz war im Jahr davor). Wie das Objekt richtig heißt (Kagerbauer-Denkmal oder Kagerbauer-Gedenkstein oder Kagerbauerstein etc.), weiß ich nicht. Ich habe von diesen Namenskandidaten einfach irgendeinen genommen, denn jeder davon ist besser als gar keine Bezeichnung. Aber zumindest die Schreibweise gehört noch ausgebessert (s.o.).
SKald (2017-05-12 22:32:59+00:00): War kein Soldat, sondern eine Art Burschenschafter ("Corps") und ist bei einem Duell umgekommen. (http://www.saxonia.at/main.php?idd=geschichte1&ort=imports)
Also eher ein Opfer von Biedermeier-Hooliganismus...
fkv (2017-05-13 09:59:46+00:00): Dass mit Corps eine Burschenschaft gemeint ist, auf die Idee bin ich nicht gekommen. Ich gratuliere zur erfolgreichen Recherche. Den Schreibfehler hab ich ausgebessert.
olehz (2016-02-07 11:13:07+00:00): навіщо видумувати номери? на будинку висить табличка з номером 20. ти ж береж міняєш її на 20/1. навіщо?!
Myazyk (2016-02-07 21:37:59+00:00): Тому що люди в міру своєї примітивності не є такими перфекціоністами, щоб так ідеально вісити таблички. явище, коли будівля має номер з дробом, а табличка без нього є досить поширеним. Багато будівель взагалі є без вказівників, але я не думаю, що на карті не треба позначати їхній номер.
Попередня перед цією хата має номер 20 (знаю точно, бо ходив туди на репетиторство до педагога під час навчання у школі, хоча на карті не була зазначена. Наступна - 20/2. Тож логічно, що дана будівля має номер 20/1, тобі так не видається?
olehz (2016-02-07 22:13:12+00:00): Добре, що ти ходив туди на репетиторство, адже такі випадки в селі Дрогобич системні. І я вважаю, що не слід намагатись їх штучно "систематизувати". Адже там запросто міг бути 18/1, а не зашифрований 20 - тут не здогадаєшся. Для мене ці тонкощі рагульського життя - це щось малозрозуміле. Якщо до них має швидка оперативно приїхати? Невже важко фарбою "дріб 1" домалювати? А потім як хтось помре, 100% почнуть бубніти, що лікарі винуваті - невчасно приїхали.
Myazyk (2016-02-07 22:18:02+00:00): Якби наступного не було 20/2, то здогадатись справді було б важче.
Коли буває спілкуюсь з людьми про номери будівель, то завжди кажу аби писали номер хати, бо як доведеться швидку викликати, то вона не має шукати де та хата чи рятувати. Але люди отакі, які є
watmildon (2026-03-09 06:19:19+00:00): I saw your fixme on this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3992860511/history#map=19/39.632545/-85.824322) while working through a MapRoulette task. You may be intersted to know that it's a "VORTAC" beacon.

Happy mapping.
jc86035 (2016-02-07 05:32:33+00:00): Does the tunnel area begin after the gas station? I think it only ends on the southbound carriageway there but it starts on the bridge over route 7 northbound.
jc86035 (2016-02-07 04:44:02+00:00): Why did you leave the end of the road highway=motorway?
00crashtest (2016-02-07 05:06:00+00:00): I didn't zoom in close enough when retagging.
jc86035 (2016-02-07 04:45:13+00:00): The "control area" designation is entirely separate from the "expressway" classification and so since North Coastal Rd is not in the gazettal it should be tagged highway=primary or highway=secondary.
00crashtest (2016-02-07 05:04:20+00:00): The Tsing Ma Control Area (along with Discovery Bay Tunnel, which is not even a dual carriageway) is listed under highway=motorway.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HK:Hong_Kong_tagging
jc86035 (2016-02-07 05:27:26+00:00): Discovery Bay Tunnel is currently highway=secondary, so I'd say the wiki page isn't all that accurate. Try messaging KX675 (writer of the wiki page).
jc86035 (2016-02-07 04:46:27+00:00): I don't know, honestly, I got corrected when I did this once so it's probably incorrect. The tunnel area probably starts on the eastern side of the exit.
naoliv (2016-02-08 00:28:52+00:00): Robinson, a linha de trem abandonada não existe mais?
Robinson Almeida (2016-02-12 20:22:59+00:00): Peço desculpas, não ví sua mensagem. Boa parte desta linha já foi retirada. Existe alguns fragmentos dela.
naoliv (2016-02-16 00:08:47+00:00): Tá certo.
Quando for assim, procure colocar uma descrição na hora que você salvar a sua edição.
É bastante útil para que os outros mapeadores entendam o que está sendo feito no mapa.
Øukasz (2021-05-24 20:38:08+00:00): Hi there,

I'd like to ask about the route restrictions on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/396475013

I think that the restriction only applies to motor vehicles, however the way it is set up now prevents routing on this road by bike and by foot. 

Am I correct in thinking that we can improve this? If yes, would you like to do it yourself, or do you want me to have a go?

Cheers,
MatrixRouter (2021-05-25 13:10:10+00:00): Hi,
The "problem" with this road is that it goes through a military zone and is only open to the public during certain times. Any other times access to the area is closed and artillery fire has to be expected. Guards are on duty. Each year the road is officially closed November 1st to May 31st http://hongrin.ch/ As far as I understand this includes any kind of traffic. It is also closed to any kind of traffic on weekdays if shooting exercises are held as published here: https://www.vtg.admin.ch/de/aktuell/mitteilungen/schiessanzeigen.zensa_detail.html/1201.050.html
On weekends it is usually open ("Bürozeiten" ;-) If you know what I mean.)
Øukasz (2021-05-26 14:07:29+00:00): Thanks for these. I guess that according to http://hongrin.ch/ this means Nov-May the route is closed for road traffic, but I don't think pedestraians or hikers should be stopped from walking during this time? Or does the closure apply to everyone? Last weekend I saw a lot of civilians enjoying the early summer weather, that's why I ask.

Separately, the restrictions on https://www.vtg.admin.ch/de/aktuell/mitteilungen/schiessanzeigen.zensa_detail.html/1201.050.html change too frequently to update the map I think, and they are also posted on notice boards so I think there's no need to add these restrictions.


So, I guess the
Øukasz (2021-05-26 14:08:35+00:00): So I guess the winter closure and military closure are 2 separate ones?
jc86035 (2016-02-07 04:47:35+00:00): If you're going to change it, at least change the whole thing instead of doing it inconsistently.
00crashtest (2016-02-07 05:07:33+00:00): I'll change the whole thing later when I have time
mavl (2016-02-07 11:59:25+00:00): Hello. This changeset is reverted.
stweb (2016-03-07 23:15:24+00:00): Thanks for this update. I was wrong to trace from expired imagery.
unsungNovelty (2016-02-09 06:49:02+00:00): Hi outerference,

You seems to have removed these private roads. Your first edit was also deletion of a private road. Can you please tell me the reason for these deletions?
outerference (2016-02-09 07:35:23+00:00): Those driveways are not public property, nor are they an easement for public use. The first edit was for a prior portion of the same driveway that was later replaced and extended to also include a private vineyard.  It also is not public either, and trespassing on any of these properties is also prohibited, as locally posted.
raito (2016-02-07 06:48:39+00:00): *boardwalk*
jc86035 (2016-02-07 11:56:22+00:00): This link is probably inaccurate and/or outdated. http://www.td.gov.hk/mini_site/hksrens/2008/EN/RouteMapL-R8.htm shows that, as signposted, route 8 ends at the end of the bridge between Tung Chung and Chek Lap Kok (at kilometre post 0). (However, both the expressway and the "route 8 end" sign are on the other side of the bridge.)
jc86035 (2016-02-07 11:53:28+00:00): Probably inaccurate and/or outdated. May have had its trunk route designation removed when route 9 was created in 2006. http://www.td.gov.hk/mini_site/hksrens/2008/EN/RouteMapM.htm does not give this road a route number and it is not an expressway, so it should be highway=secondary.
00crashtest (2016-02-07 12:05:09+00:00): I actually found the link here: http://www.hyd.gov.hk/en/road_and_railway/existing/index.html
It's last review date is 14 Apr 2015 (very update)!
Again, benefit of the doubt again.
jc86035 (2016-02-07 13:36:10+00:00): Or, more logically, you could go with whatever is on the road signs that are *actually there* if there's a conflict between two sources.
MaciekKolejKłodzko (2016-02-16 13:23:38+00:00): Budynek stojący na drodze łączącej ul. Wiosenną i sklep Biedronka nie istnieje.
rowers2 (2016-02-26 06:49:18+00:00): W tak oczywistych rzeczach kasuj budynek, bo budynki są importowane często z warstw na geoportalu które nie zostały uaktualnione. Jeśli budynek został zburzony a nie ma drogi i ktoś mógłby go ponownie wrysować po skasowaniu, to najlepiej tag zamienić z building=yes na landuse=brownfield (tereny powyburzeniowe)  Nie czytam komentarzy  więc jak coś zauważysz ważnego to pisz na piva
atpl_pilot (2016-02-07 10:20:01+00:00): Anmekrung, der Datensatz wurde nur unvollständig hochgeladen, Update folgt.
atpl_pilot (2016-02-07 08:44:44+00:00): Wir hatten das Thema bereits. DAS IST ''KEIN LANDUSE RETAIL!!!! LIES' DOC'H' MAL DAS WIKI!!!!
mueschel (2016-02-10 18:46:20+00:00): Hallo Alex,
hier scheint es einen Fehler mit Adressen zu geben: http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/511108 "Am Erdbeerfeld 25" scheint das nicht zu sein.
Gruß, Jan
sebu0307 (2016-02-07 09:19:37+00:00): does not seem to have worked. I'm new to openstreetmap; changed areas do not show up in their shape in map.
Peilscheibe (2016-02-08 17:18:03+00:00): They do. But: a private garden behind a residential building isn't a park. Please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpark and learn about not to tag for the renderer. This means, do not tag something as a park just to get it rendered in green if it isn't a park.
And please use the name tag only for the proper name of an object. In this case, description=* could be appropriate, if at all.
To learn about OSM especially in Stuttgart, I'd recommend reading the wiki intensively and visiting the regular's table: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Stuttgart/Stammtisch
PlaneMad (2016-02-12 07:14:09+00:00): Thanks for reverting. Curious to know how you detected the vandalism?
rarad74 (2016-02-12 07:23:22+00:00): The user to which i reverted changeset aleatory deleted in entire country valid data without giving any explanation , even to Data Working Group too...

PS:  I am curious too, why you are so curios?  You are an experienced user if i must take in consideration the number of your edits...
PlaneMad (2016-02-12 07:46:12+00:00): Thanks. I have been looking into automatic flagging of changesets with vandalism using osmcha. We have a test instance running if you would like to try: http://osmcha-django-staging.tilestream.net/

Found your changeset by looking up changes with the comment 'vandal' ;)
adrianojbr (2016-02-07 14:04:32+00:00): rodrigo, oficina de moto é http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dmotorcycle_repair

nessa página também diz que pode usar "parts=yes" para expressa que a função principal é consertar, mas também vende peças.