piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:36:22+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
LLlypuk82 (2016-08-11 19:36:51+00:00): «Решение» — название чего?
Ranger Gpef (2016-08-11 20:44:53+00:00): Название отделения банка. Само отделение принадлежит "Трастбанк"
literan (2016-08-11 12:37:08+00:00): highway=residential это именованные улицы. Для обычных проездов используйте highway=service. Здесь поправлю.
frosm (2021-01-28 09:47:29+00:00): Bonjour Tony,
il y a un problème Rue du Cactus, tu as créés plein de no 77
un nouveau contributeur a commencé à corriger (avec qlq erreurs de débutant, voir https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98283922)
frosm (2021-01-28 09:48:13+00:00): je parle de l'Impasse du Cactus et non de la rue du caxtus :)
BCNorwich (2016-08-11 12:45:42+00:00): Hello, Ridge Road looks at lot wider than 7 feet, in fact it looks like it is an extra wide road. It is therefore not correct to tag it as maxwidth=7'0" This is obviously not the case especially as you intimate that it has been tagged thus to discourage traffic.
A better way is to map exactly what is on the ground. The road is restricted at the Church Street end and is separated into two narrow lanes (possibly each 7 feet wide), with an emergency lane between them. Regards
EIjas (2016-08-12 15:10:19+00:00): Проверяйте, пожалуйста, смещение спутниковых снимков прежде, чем двигать точки.
EIjas (2016-08-12 15:17:28+00:00): http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B5_%D0%B0%D1%8D%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%84%D0%BE%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2
mavl (2016-08-12 16:43:54+00:00): Здравствуйте. Не добавляйте, пожалуйста, в OpenStreetMap личную информацию. Ваш дом - это не гостевой дом.  
  
[http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4345580793/history]  
  
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:tourism=guest%20house?uselang=ru
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:33:16+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
dudka (2016-08-14 19:47:56+00:00): are you going to edit this area again?
could you please fix the railway nearby https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3694782669 ?
jaimemd (2016-08-14 20:11:17+00:00): I'd love to do this. The other user was a test account since I had some problem with JOSM. Also it was difficult to edit this area because the Bing images seem to have incorrect position. Now I found that mapbox images seem to do better. Sorry for the mess and thanks for asking!
Commodoortje (2016-08-15 17:37:38+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  changeset gerevert. Aangebrachte bankje staat midden in een woonhuis . Gelieve niet toevoegen omdat het kan, dit schaadt de OSM kaart in ernstige vorm. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
TheSwavu (2016-08-14 21:20:11+00:00): Hi,

If you are mapping in NSW would you please use the LPI Imagery in preference to the Bing, you'll find it is clearer and more accurate.

Thanks.
gpstracks (2016-08-11 17:45:53+00:00): Hello.
Please note you aere adding a lot of duplicated and often misplaced POIs.
Check your source(s).

Thank You.
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:33:06+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
luschi (2016-08-14 11:11:06+00:00): Dadurch, dass du den Punkt mit dem Parkplatz komplett entfernt hast, hast du die Wanderwegrelation 8B sowie 23 beschädigt.
Ich habe deine Änderung rückgängig gemacht und nur den Parkplatz entfernt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41444519
Müszi (2017-01-08 14:25:46+00:00): Salut!

Văd că ai adăugat marcajul turistic la proprietățile drumului. În OSM se face altfel: trebuie să creezi o relație de tip "traseu turistic" (route=hiking), și apoi adaugi ca membri porțiunile de drum ca aparțin marcajului.

Traseul cruce roșie există deja ("Băița - Vf. Țapu - Vârtop") și acest drum este deja membru, deci am să șterg tag-urile care nu sunt necesare.


Szia!

Látom, hogy hozzáadtad a turistajelzéseket az út tulajdonságaihoz. OSM-ben másképp csináljuk: először létre kell hozni egy turistaútvonalat (route=hiking), majd ehhez az útvonalhoz kell hozzáadni az turistajelzés egyes útszakaszait.

A piros kereszt jelzés már létezik ("Rézbánya - Bakhát - Vârtop-hágó") és ez az útszakasz is része már, tehát törlöm a fölösleges tag-eket.

-- 
Szia: Zsolt
DGerveno (2016-08-11 16:30:06+00:00): ¿Podrías documentar los cambios que haces, y citar las fuentes? Un saludo,
Andrés31 (2016-08-12 12:29:55+00:00): En este caso el visor SigPac. Disculpa que no lo pusiese. Si necesitas más datos dímelo.
mike140 (2018-11-13 12:05:49+00:00): А что такое "хитрый базар"?
zstadler (2017-03-27 10:59:23+00:00): Way
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/361665576
has no tags. What is it?
Derick Rethans (2016-08-14 22:04:11+00:00): It still has some odd things here:

name 	MikeCurleyMusic.Com
name:en 	Tanworth in Arden
tourism 	artwork

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/666779
physi_retired (2016-08-11 17:21:28+00:00): Nach meinem Kenntnisstand hat die Capital Stage AG nur die 8 Windräder der Energiekontor übernommen und nicht alle Windräder auf der Vollrather Höhe. Oder gibt es da anderslautende Quellen?
Neukirchener (2016-08-11 21:27:39+00:00): Danke für die Rückmeldung. Mein Infostand war, dass alle Windräder zu Energiekontor gehörten - daher die Änderung bei allen Windrädern. Dies scheint wohl nicht 100%ig zu stimmen. Weißt du welche 8 Windräder dies betrifft? Wäre nett, wenn du das entsprechend korrigieren könntest.
LG
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-11 13:11:39+00:00): Olá Nil ,vi que vc criou duas restrições, mas elas não estão servido pra nada. :D Uma restrição "proibido virar a esquerda" tem que conter 3 elemento, a via de partida, ponto  que separada os dois e a via  destino
erickdeoliveiraleal (2016-08-11 13:19:18+00:00): Ontem criei cerca de 100 restrições em Fortaleza, mas sou de Brasília. Veja o exemplo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41369220

Se vc clicar em alguma das relações ela vai mostrar os elementos das restrições

Eu contribuo mais usando o JOSM, acho melhor, é um editor mais avançado feito no Java.
Alecs01 (2016-09-02 16:31:58+00:00): Ciao Mauro, qui hai cancellato credo per errore il nodo "place" di Lallio, l'ho ripristinato: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/62506498/history
geow (2016-08-15 20:05:15+00:00): Hallo, herzlich willkommen bei OSM und herzlichen Dank für die ersten 91 Changesets in einer Woche. Das sieht nach einem sehr guten Start aus :)

Wenn ihr noch Tipps zum Einstieg brauchst, schaut mal auf diese Seiten:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/help

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Willkommen_bei_OpenStreetMap

http://learnosm.org/de/

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:tourism

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Wandern

Viele Grüße
geow
user_5359 (2016-08-13 14:11:35+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Für Öffnungszeiten liest Dir bitte mal http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours durch. Wichtigster Hinweis (außer englische Wochentag Abkürzungen) Zeiten sind nicht additiv: Wenn Du zweimal Montag angibst, gilt nur(!) der letzte Eintrag.
MKnight (2016-08-13 17:58:14+00:00): Das stimmt so nicht ganz, mit einem Komma (additiv) würde ein Schuh draus:

bspw.:

Mo-Fr 08:00-12:00, Mo,Th 15:00-18:00, Tu 14:00-17:00

Siehe auch: http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/?EXP=Mo-Fr%2008%3A00-12%3A00%2C%20Mo%2CTh%2015%3A00-18%3A00%2C%20Tu%2014%3A00-17%3A00&DATE=1471110960000&lat=48.7769&lon=9.1844&mode=0
literan (2016-08-12 12:43:19+00:00): Прошу вас не превращать малозначимые дороги, ведущий к одному-двум населенным пунктам, в tertiary, как эту https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/235063317/history - ознакомьтесь, пожалуйста, с классификацией дорог http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification . Я поправлю.
naoliv (2016-08-12 20:44:55+00:00): Gabriel, a mesma coisa aqui (e para qualquer outro tipo de objeto): nomes descritivos ou genéricos não devem ser utilizados
Se a estrada não possui nome ou se não sabe o nome dela, basta deixar sem nome
Colocar "Estrada" apenas não é correto
Supaplex (2016-08-24 10:37:12+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Alecs01 (2016-08-11 13:34:46+00:00): Hi, are these really "monuments" or private houses instead?
Nasze Miasto Niepołomice (2016-08-12 18:55:39+00:00): segmentowaiec Oficerska 12-18 do podziały na konkretne budynki
user_870861 (2016-08-13 11:41:56+00:00): hi,
there is a lot off duplicated building in this area (duplicated = exactly same geometry and same tags between two distinct way)

you can see issues there :
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/map/#zoom=17&lat=34.510853&lon=135.57141&item=0&level=2
helicoysfh (2016-08-13 15:47:03+00:00): Thank you very much.
I will fix in the coming days.
helicoysfh (2016-08-14 03:12:10+00:00): I repair has been completed.
user_870861 (2016-08-15 08:18:39+00:00): perfect !
helicoysfh (2016-08-15 12:15:26+00:00): ありがとう。
Thank you.
canfe (2020-11-28 14:08:05+00:00): Non riesco a vedere la cappella di Santo Stefano a Maggiora.
Ma è posizionata bene??
procuste (2020-12-02 14:23:05+00:00): La cappella di Santo Stefano dovrebbe essere al n. 26 di Piazza Antonelli, più o meno dove l'ho posizionata. Non sembra un edificio sacro da fuori, si vede solo un portoncino. È visibile anche sul sito del comune (https://www.comune.maggiora.no.it/luogo/img_cappelle.aspx)
canfe (2020-12-04 09:58:04+00:00): Identificata! Accidenti mettetegli una scritta! :-)
C'è però una incongruenza: se è un pilone votivo, senza altare, non c'è culto.
Invece se ci si "entra dentro" almeno un sacerdote e c'è un altare per dire messa è una chiesa.
maraf24 (2016-08-12 20:29:39+00:00): Cześć.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436724453
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3358613045/history
Zauważ, że to nie są takie same adresy. Ten twój ma mniej informacji i nie ma pola addr:place.
Do przenoszenia adresów na budynek można wykorzystać funkcję scalania/łączenia w edytorze - to ta ikonka z plusem.
Pozdrawiam
mucx (2016-08-14 21:59:57+00:00): Denke es ist ein bisschen Overkill die (teilweise einzelnen) Bäume rund um das Schulgebäude als eine zusammenhängende Waldfläche zu mappen. Außerdem ist hier 'natural=wood' passender, da es sich ja nicht um einen bewirtschafteten Wald handelt. Habe die Fläche mal reduziert und das tagging angepasst.
Kerim_m (2016-08-14 18:14:40+00:00): "Bolesławiecka Góra" - powstała w 2012 roku, a nigdy o niej nie słyszałem.

PRNG podaje inne współrzędne.
Rzezimierz (2016-08-14 21:25:07+00:00): Słowo klucz - PRNG, jest tam? Sprawdź warstwę hipsometrii ISOK w geoportalu, widac wyraźnie że wyniesienie jest w miejscu, gdzie postawiłem węzeł, akurat współrzędne położenia węzła z PRNG można w pewnych sytuacjach potraktować z przymrużeniem oka.
BBM1 (2016-08-11 15:03:41+00:00): There is a typo in the changeset.  It should read: "East 2nd Street was converted to allow two-way traffic from Pine Street to Franklin Street, in Michigan City, Indiana on 6.14.16.
Johnny Carlsen (2016-10-05 17:40:06+00:00): Please don't delete the Thai names from the name field. The name field should be in Thai. The field name:en can be used for English or transcribed named.
user_5359 (2016-08-15 19:05:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node. I think you miss to add highway=service and name=...
josiebessie (2016-08-15 19:40:36+00:00): Cul-de-sac street is named Club Ct.  Not sure if this is what you need?  Not used to using this interface.
user_5359 (2016-08-20 13:37:17+00:00): Please check the map. I hope this tis the right result.
oini (2016-08-31 10:55:48+00:00): Hey Gerardo,
Similar to your other changeset, I've reverted this changeset of yours as well as it contained fictional and untagged ways too. Please check http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highways to know more about the mapping conventions on OSM. Let me know if you have further queries.
Cheers,
Oindrila
Владимир К (2016-08-16 14:02:17+00:00): для старых/других названий объекта есть alt_name, old_name и т.д., а не скобки
Constable (2017-02-05 18:31:48+00:00): Rimuovi il nome "fontana" per favore. Il tag name va usato per indicare il nome proprio dell'oggetto mappato (ammesso che lo abbia). É quello il caso dei negozi, per i quali si usa name="NOMENEGOZIO", ma se aggiungi una fontanella, ammesso che non abbia un nome proprio (Fontana di Trevi), il tag name va lasciato vuoto.
Constable (2017-02-06 18:46:04+00:00): provvedo io a rimuovere il nome.
Sarebbe però auspiacbile una risposta ogni tanto.
grazie, ciao
Sanniu (2017-04-24 11:24:38+00:00): Hi. You marked way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92129147 as oneway, but it first node not connected to anything, can you look there?
user_5359 (2016-08-15 19:03:23+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't mark the whole property as building. Only mark the building as building. 

And please notice: The address isn’t part of the building name.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-10-23 18:46:10+00:00): can you check this? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3410923
freebeer (2018-10-27 13:05:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 63927682 where the changeset comment is: delete a bogus maps.me castle loaded with personal private info
Mateusz Konieczny (2018-01-04 21:20:13+00:00): Can you look at http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1258232 ?
Ljubica Macej (2016-08-11 17:56:40+00:00): Confirm location
Ljubica Macej (2016-08-11 17:57:45+00:00): Confirm location
habi (2026-04-01 11:47:54+00:00): Ciao Oli

Hier hast du den Quartieren eine `swisstopo:BFS_NUMMER` vergeben.
Für http://boundaries.osm.ch suche ich Schweizweit nach dieser Nummer, für die Quartiere von Bern gibt's die aber *nicht* in den swisstopo-Daten.
Fändsch OK, wenn ich `swisstopo:BFS_NUMMER` in (z.B.) `ref:bfs` umwandle?

E Gruess,
Habi
Commodoortje (2016-08-15 17:47:18+00:00): Gecontroleerd,  changeset gerevert. POI is niet aanwezig op deze lokatie. Gelieve niet toevoegen omdat het kan, dit schaadt de OSM kaart in ernstige vorm. MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
valerietheblonde (2017-10-03 17:46:33+00:00): Hi Rhony, I don't see evidence that this school exists.
trial (2017-12-19 21:27:22+00:00): Hi, I think you mistyped island and meant islet as I saw from the aerial view.
Please check https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/54771534
Little Brother (2018-01-03 11:54:14+00:00): Thank you for correcting my mistake
trial (2018-01-03 20:23:10+00:00): you're welcome. Happy new year!
IknowJoseph (2016-08-12 12:54:04+00:00): Hi, you removed almost all the wikipedia tags? :( There are really helpful for the OSM built in search engine.
Hjart (2016-08-14 13:43:44+00:00): Er dette et privat hjem?
Jothirnadh (2016-08-26 04:33:37+00:00): Hello Vahidrahimi,

Thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap, but your edits seems to not align with imagery. The POI's you added are on the roads. Can you please move them from road to the exact location.

Thanking you,
Jothirnadh
Владимир К (2016-08-15 06:18:17+00:00): А чем это лучше уже указанной стоянки Средняя Джурла?
Martin Borsje (2017-11-01 19:50:35+00:00): Hoi 

Ik zie dat je aan beide sporen van de Betuweroute de naam Betuweroute gegeven hebt.

Voor een dergelijk geïsoleerde treinroute inderdaad gerechtvaardigd om deze van een naam te voorzien, alhoewel er natuurlijk geen straatnaambordje staat :-)
Echter: door het heengaande en teruggaande spoor te benamen wordt ook 'Betuwerote' tweemaal gerenderd. Ik denk dat dat overbodig is en je zou van een van de sporen de naam af kunnen halen. Wat vind je zelf daarvan?
Martin
JJJWegdam (2017-11-02 10:41:46+00:00): Beste Martin,
Het heengaande en teruggaande spoor hebben beide de eigenschap dat ze bij de Betuweroute horen en 'verdienen' mijns inziens dus beide een name=Betuweroute. Dit in overeenstemming met wat er op de wiki staat over railway names: "The name of a railway line e.g. Illinois Central. Use this tag for proper names only. You should not enter descriptions such as Boston - Washington, DC or the name of the track inside a station, like Track 5. See also Names#Name_is_the_name_only" (bron: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging). Verder benoem je dat het voor renderers vervolgens lastig is om hier 1 naam uit te genereren. Dat is opzich wel een makke, maar het is niet juist om je tags daarop aan te passen; dit verstoort namelijk software die de data van OSM gebruikt voor andere doeleinden dan het renderen van kaarten (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer).

Hopelijk heb ik je vragen voldoende beantwoord.

Jeroen
Martin Borsje (2017-11-02 12:06:27+00:00): Hoi Jeroen.

Dank voor je antwoord.

Taggen voor de renderer is in mijn ogen ook een zonde als dat de werkelijkheid geweld aandoet.

De vraag is of je de BetuweLIJN (in het algemeen twee tracks) één naam geeft (wat mijn voorkeur heeft en volgens mij de wiki ook aangeeft) of dat je beide tracks de naam van de lijn geeft (wat jij gedaan hebt).

Je kunt natuurlijk ook op de individuele tracks een 'ref' kwijt en toch de Betuwelijn enkelvoudig noemen. Los van de rendering denk ik niet dat "de Nederlander" vindt dat er twee Betuwelijnen zijn (we hebben het hier niet over de budgetoverschrijding :-) )
Maar ik kan het mis hebben....

Martin
JJJWegdam (2017-11-06 12:28:23+00:00): Beste Martin,
Allereerst, om verwarring te voorkomen, wil ik je er even op wijzen dat je in je eerste comment sprak over de Betuweroute en dat dit in je tweede comment veranderde in Betuwelijn. Dit zijn twee verschillende spoorlijnen: de Betuweroute is de goederenspoorlijn Kijfhoek-Zevenaar, de Betuwelijn is de (grotendeels enkelsporige) spoorlijn Dordrecht-Elst en de MerwedeLingelijn is de naam van de Arriva treindienst op de Betuwelijn tussen Dordrecht en Geldermalsen. Ik neem voor het gemak even aan dat het nog steeds gaat om de Betuweroute.

Inhoudelijk: helaas vrees ik dat ik het oneens met je ben. Beide tracks maken in dit geval samen één spoorlijn. Dat maakt de ene track niet 'minder' dan de ander. Tevens zie ik niet hoe je voorgestelde aanpak zou werken bij lijnaansluitingen (splitsingen). Daarom hou ik me ook liever aan de definitie op de wiki. Een manier die betere render-resultaten zou geven is het toevoegen van een extra shape per traject, die in het midden van het tracé ligt. Als je daar tags aan toekent zoals lijnnaam en geocode (baanvaknummer) dan ben je van het probleem af.

Ten slotte: je noemt de 'ref' als mogelijke oplossing. Dit is binnen de huidige standaard niet mogelijk; 'ref' wordt gebruikt om de geocode in op te slaan.

Mvg,
Jeroen
user_5359 (2016-08-16 05:23:51+00:00): Willkommen bei OSM! Dein Korrekturversuch von der Notiz 663639 ist in zwei Punkte nicht ganz korrekt. Zu einem verschwindet eine Straße nicht, wenn man sie mit einer neuen Straße übermalt und zum anderen gehört die Adresse nicht an die Straße sondern an / ins Gebäude. Ich habe mir erlaubt, die Straße an der Kreuzung zu teilen und die Adresse zu löschen: siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/437404285

Kennst Du übrigens schon den Bonner Stammtisch http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bonn/Stammtisch ? Etwas spät für eine Einladung, aber heute Abend wäre wieder eine Möglichkeit offene Fragen zu OSM in freundlicher Atmosphäre beantwortet zu bekommen.
Tractor (2016-08-11 21:54:30+00:00): Her har du sletta informasjon om at dette er ei skiløype og at stien er merka. Stemmer dette? Vær så snill og ikke slett tagger du ikke vet hva betyr.
Tractor (2016-08-12 00:40:52+00:00): Ser du har retta opp i taggene på denne stien nå. Veldig bra!

Du bør nok se gjennom de stiene du har endra de siste dagene siden det sikkert er flere der du uforvarende har slette informasjon... :-)
SomeoneElse (2016-08-15 13:13:31+00:00): Hello,
Can you explain under what licence you obtained http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436774890 ?  The source document is clearly marked as Crown Copyright.  Did you get an explicit exemption from them?
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend
AdVerburg (2016-08-15 19:06:16+00:00): Good day to you,
Indeed, the crowns copyright. In the following sentence is written over making copies in some form and not selling it. Nothing about limitations using the printed information. However it would be better to explicitly ask their exemption to use the data in OSM.
Yours sincerely Ad Verburg.
SomeoneElse (2016-08-19 18:54:53+00:00): I've reverted it (apart from the Norwegian end that someone has already edited).  The licence is clearly incompatible with OSM.
Alecs01 (2016-08-12 09:50:52+00:00): Benvenuto su OpenStreetMap! Attenzione perchè hai spostato delle strade di varie decine di metri, ho corretto. Se hai bisogno di aiuto chiedi pure. Ciao buon mapping!
Jarek 🚲 (2016-08-11 20:12:41+00:00): This is accurate as of April 2016 when I last had chance to survey in person. But I guess that's better than being accurate as of June 2015, which was the case before this edit...
rickmastfan67 (2016-12-27 03:44:26+00:00): Hey Chris, I think you got caught up in this changeset with that false 'I-295' shield they showed in PRs about the new section of highway opening.  It's all posted as NC-295 for now.  So, I'd recommend fixing that. http://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=8390.msg2168222#msg2168222
Chris Lawrence (2017-01-04 03:14:56+00:00): I think it's all fixed now, along with a short segment of the road that was tagged access=no.
rickmastfan67 (2017-01-04 23:02:57+00:00): Cool beans. :)
nyuriks (2017-10-01 08:38:39+00:00): Hi, I think this supermarcet should  use brand:wikidata instead of operator:wikidata. Please let me know if it is also operated by aldi. Thanks!
L'imaginaire (2017-10-13 10:18:05+00:00): Thanks for this correction. I'm not sure about the actual operator, so we can leave it as it is now.
Thundercel (2017-08-20 10:56:54+00:00): Olá Nepomuceno. a tag natural=cliff significa penhasco e deve ser empregada em points ou ways e nunca em áreas ou relations. Recebemos hoje a seguinte informação http://cocardl.com.br/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=469 e ao verificarmos o problema identificamos o emprego da tag natural=cliff em áreas na parte oeste de Quixadá. Nesse caso, quando área se emprega a tag natural=bare_rock  Veja wiki em http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dbare_rock
Estou alterando os cliff por bare_rock
Daniel de Góes Nepomuceno (2017-08-20 13:34:19+00:00): obrigado pela instrução e correção Márcio.
user_599436 (2016-08-11 23:30:37+00:00): Hello tubtrack, welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding this feature. 

Your first edit entered the address correctly.

The name tag should be used for whatever the object is, for example a business name.