piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:06:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:05:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:06:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-31 23:05:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125631688 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some poor and fantasy mapping in Guinea and elsewhere.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Socredelir/diary/399858
Supaplex (2021-04-17 07:23:14+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
baumann3141 (2021-01-05 23:25:49+00:00): Your footpath inside the building is not genearally accessible, so I would not map it. Unless you want to map the building hallways and add tags for access restrictions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96946314
rayhem (2021-01-06 02:16:05+00:00): Aha, ok - the tool issued warnings about an unconnected path and gave suggested I either connect it or delete it. I take it the warnings can be ignored in such cases?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96946314
baumann3141 (2021-01-06 03:49:21+00:00): Yes, the warnings should be ignored sometimes. They are generated by algorithms that don't necessarily know the full context. I would remove the pathways inside the building and add entry tags where the outside paths attach to the building in case you know that there are entries (i.e. you know this building!). Otherwise, leave this detail out rather than putting assumptions on the map! Happy Mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96946314
treestryder (2021-01-06 03:52:46+00:00): Mapping a "footway" through the school, at level "-1", as if it were an underground tunnel, is definitely not correct. What tool are you seeing these warnings in?
Nakaner (2021-01-05 08:31:22+00:00): Hallo,

ich habe diesen Änderungssatz rückgängig in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96961052 gemacht. Die Gründe sind in der Diskussion von https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96833892 angegeben.

Viele Grüße

Michael
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96947106
Carnildo (2021-01-05 19:39:33+00:00): Two requests:

1. If you're going to delete and re-draw a building, make sure you copy all the information over.  When you re-drew the Kennedy Apartments, you lost the fact that it was a five-story apartment building.

2. If you're using RapiD to add buildings, check the suggestions against Esri World Imagery as well as Maxar Premium.  Esri's older (about two years, versus Maxar's four months), but it's "leaves-off" imagery, so you can look under the trees and tell that the AI's having you map multiple buildings with one outline, something you did at least 16 times in your latest batch of buildings.
PT-53 (2021-01-05 08:55:43+00:00): Hallo  kumarxeq,
dies 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892149101/history
ist eine Hauszufahrt auf einem privaten Grundstück. Ich habe deshalb noch
service=driveway
ergänzt. Bitte künftig beachten.
Grüße
kumarxeq (2021-01-06 04:29:48+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. I have made the edits based the available imagery. 
It is good to see the community improvising our edits. I will take this as a learning from the community and make sure to follow in my future edits. Always happy to learn from the community
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-15 23:53:54+00:00): reverted as guessing (partially due to nasty edit conflicts) - but guesses were not deliberately damaging, so damage is not very significant

see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/96926703
Miguel Pedr (2021-01-06 03:41:19+00:00): Hola,
Aquí las direcciones dadas son incorrectas y también los datos modelados parecen inapropiados y la creación de enlaces y los nombres son incorrectos aquí y también los datos anteriores estaban bien. No modele los datos inapropiados y también dar las direcciones incorrectas tendrá un impacto en la navegación. Sea lo que sea, estaré encantado de ayudarte. Feliz año nuevo.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96949960
BeniHammad (2021-01-08 03:39:38+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thank you for looking into this and reaching out. After further review, I do see that these u-turns would occur before the crosswalks. I have now corrected these one ways and improved the nearby building alignment.
Traducción:
Hola Miguel Pedr, Gracias por investigar y comunicarte. Después de una revisión más detallada, veo que estos cambios de sentido ocurrirían antes de los cruces peatonales. Ahora he corregido estas formas únicas y mejorado la alineación del edificio cercano.
PT-53 (2021-01-05 08:51:28+00:00): Hallo kumarxeq,
eine Hauszufahrt wird bei uns nicht als track sondern als
hihgway=service    +
servcie=driveway
eingestuft:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892159396/history

Auch die Straße davor muß mindestens als service eingestuft werden:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892201023/history

Ich habe Deine Einträge entsprechend verbessert und bitte um künftige beachtung.
Grüße
kumarxeq (2021-01-06 11:05:12+00:00): Thanks for checking into our edits. apologies, i have overlooked the imagery and added the track. Thanks for the improvisation. i will make sure to follow your suggestions in my future edits. Always happy to learn from the community
ScottWalkerAU (2021-01-06 02:48:08+00:00): Confused how you managed to get 205 deletions for a name change
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96951657
SpecializedRider (2021-01-06 08:57:42+00:00): Simplified the way in JOSM as the track was originally imported from GPS.
user_5239402 (2021-01-05 08:35:29+00:00): 안녕하세요 
경전철 노선의 태그를 subway로 왜 바꾸나요?
light_rail은 경전철을 의미합니다. monorail=모노레일을 뜻합니다. 그리고 우이신설선은 경전철 노선입니다. light_rail로 바꾸어주세요.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-21 20:01:43+00:00): Do you have any idea what waterway=soakhole, imported as part of LINZ import, means?

See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6750217
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-01-21 21:11:19+00:00): Answered in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/6750217
Ammuooos5678 (2021-01-05 09:02:23+00:00): good job
mmahmud (2021-01-08 08:33:09+00:00): Hi, the service highway is overlapping with multiple buildings and is glued with two buildings. Highways should not overlap or glued to any buildings. Kindly fix. Also the road does not align with Bing. If the road is drawn from "local knowledge", then add that as source. Thanks
IskandarMudaSiregar (2021-01-08 09:52:42+00:00): hallo..

thank you to reminds me about edit road that i've made. there are many mistakes i made, and i wanna say sorry for that.
i will fix it asap.
mmahmud (2021-01-08 09:53:55+00:00): No worries. That is how we learn. Thanks for editing.
whb (2021-01-05 21:54:22+00:00): Guten Tag,

irgendwie hast du einige Objekte doppelt erfasst, einige Beispiele:
Doppelte Garage:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892169337
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892162808
Doppelte Hecke:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892164351
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892169335
Doppelte Zufahrt:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892169341
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892162810

Könntest du bitte die von dir erstellten Objekte auf Dopplungen untersuchen und diese ggf. entfernen?

Viele Grüße
whb
Interteutones (2021-01-05 22:25:07+00:00): Danke für die Info. Heute ist mir die Software mal hängen geblieben. Dabei ist das bestimmt passiert.
Außerdem bin ich noch Anfänger und manches ist mir och nicht 100 % klar. Grüße
Jürgen
mohsen sam daliri (2021-01-06 08:53:11+00:00): درود امکان داره دیگه تغییر ندین منلطق کوه ها رو کم کم تمام تگ ها رو درست می کنم ممنون میشم🙏🍀❤
taketaketake (2021-01-08 01:55:35+00:00): 都道閲覧システムで確認しましたが、ここは都道482号線ではないので修正をお願い致します。
http://tokyoto.roadic-tokyo.org/
a5ary (2021-01-08 02:36:17+00:00): 確認・修正しました。
ありがとうございます。
変更セット: 97137024
gileri (2021-01-05 10:21:38+00:00): Bonjour, merci pour vos contributions :)

À Lyon comme la plupart des grandes villes les adresses sont déjà cartographiées, il n'y a pas besoin de les dupliquer. Exemple :

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5462105812 (déjà présente) et https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/125551074 (que tu as ajouté)

Malheureusement StreetComplete propose toujours cette quête alors que l'adresse existe déjà, il vaut mieux l'ignorer dans les grandes villes françaises. D'autres éditeurs comme iD ou Vespucci sur mobile permettent de mieux voir la situation.

Éric
eggie (2021-01-05 07:55:28+00:00): Dag Gerard,
Je kunt het best op de adresnode bijtaggen. Dus niet op de gebouw omtrek...of het moet echt de naam van het gebouw zijn.
Dan kan het weer wel. 
Dan toevoegen 
amenity=community_centre  Dan krijg je een symbool.


MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-05 08:03:58+00:00): Ahh .. Ik heb te snel gekeken. Je hebt de naam verwijderd. Dat is oke.
Op de adresnode kun je dan de tandartspraktijk toevoegen
amenity=dentist
name=...

Zie verder
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Ddentist
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-05 10:05:58+00:00): tandartspraktijk toegevoegd
GerardHog (2021-01-05 11:09:14+00:00): Top!
user_5239402 (2021-01-05 08:42:07+00:00): 안녕하세요.
철도 노선만 같은 색상으로 통일하려면 노선명에만 태그하면 곤란합니다. 노선뿐만이 아니라 모든 철도에도 같은 태그를 해야합니다. 지하철 노선의 정확하게 검증을 할려면 아래 사이트를 들어가보세요. 그러면 완벽하게 편집을 할수 있습니다.
http://osm-subway.maps.me/south-korea.html
Sanniu (2021-01-12 09:13:19+00:00): Hello Gal.
After you change there is no pass from HaKlor to HaHarlap in one direction - is this really the case on the ground?
Claudius Henrichs (2021-01-06 09:13:30+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for your work to improve the map. You have stated that you traced some elements from Bing, but I cannot find any trace of those ways on the Bing satellite imagery in the West of Babol:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892186002
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892186003
Also a secondary dual carriage way would be at a very odd location here. Can you validate that these ways exist?
Miguel Pedr (2021-01-06 03:21:48+00:00): Hola, ¿Hay alguna razón específica para eliminar las direcciones cuando las direcciones indicadas son correctas? Agregue las direcciones, ya que es una dirección. Siempre tenga cuidado con las direcciones en las carreteras principales y en los espejos. Feliz año nuevo. Gracias.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/96960528
4thandGill (2021-01-07 20:33:18+00:00): Hi Miguel Pedr, Thank you for reaching out about this. I will review this area further, as I also noticed other improvements that can be made.
Traducción:
Hola Miguel Pedr, Gracias por comunicarte con esto. Revisaré esta área más a fondo, ya que también noté otras mejoras que se pueden hacer.
ivanbranco (2021-01-07 19:16:08+00:00): Hi Bayarmanlai26,

this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892192729 has an invalid key, can you fix it?
eggie (2021-01-05 09:18:44+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

review.. Je toevoeging lijkt me niet correct.
Je hebt nu een gebouw op een gebouw ingetekend . Dat gebouw bestaat niet. Het beste kun je de school toevoegen aan de juiste adresnode. Op het bestaande gebouw staat al name=Junior Campus  m aar ook niet juist getagd als amenity=school

Je edits.. 
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=96963446
MVG,
Eggie
namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-01-05 09:42:30+00:00): Dennis.. Je gebouw op het gebouw heb ik weer  verwijderd.
De info staat op de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
sovereign_ch (2021-01-06 06:29:43+00:00): Durch CS 97022983 revertiert aufgrund grossflächig gelöschter landuse-Elemente (Multipolygone, geschlossene Wege).
RicoElectrico (2021-01-05 09:18:09+00:00): Cześć, proszę o trochę dokładniejsze rysowanie budynków. Np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892206240 - na zdjęciach lotniczych wygląda, że ma kąty proste, więc ten trójkątny kawałek na południu jest niepotrzebny.

Gdy zaznaczysz budynek, pod menu z prawego przycisku myszy masz funkcję prostowania kątów, którą należy użyć gdy budynek ma kąty proste. 

Obrys budynku powinien odzwierciedlać zewnętrzne ściany.

Bardzo polecam przejście do końca samouczka dostępnego w edytorze dostępnego z menu pomocy (patrz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID_editor_walkthrough ). Jest tam sekcja o podstawach rysowania budynków.

W razie pytań pisz śmiało tutaj albo na polskim forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23

Dzięki i miłego mapowania! :)
sovereign_ch (2021-01-06 06:26:22+00:00): Durch CS 97022983 revertiert aufgrund diverser unbegründet gelöschter Elemente (Kaskade).
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-06 16:29:23+00:00): Hi DThos, welcome to OSM.

May we know the reason behind deleting several mapped landuse areas? Thanks.

See https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-change-viz?c=96965302#13/38.4722/-121.3225

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
ivanbranco (2021-12-28 11:17:18+00:00): Hi horisyu,

https://overpass-turbo.eu/?w=%22place%22%3D%22block_number%22+global&R

place=block_number is not a valid place value.
you could add place=city_block + name=*block number* to the already existent landuse areas, what you think?
horisyu (2021-12-29 05:22:36+00:00): Thank you for your advice.
The correction is completed.
03142 (2021-01-05 09:40:35+00:00): https://pasteboard.co/JHmhXfB.jpg
many852123 (2021-01-07 06:12:00+00:00): These images are made by your mind and have no credibility and do not constantly try to enter incorrect information in the map
Shaun das Schaf (2021-01-05 19:11:43+00:00): Hallo Haweier,

die von dir gesetzten Zugangsbeschränkungen erscheinen mir komisch. bicycle, foot und horse zu setzen ist nicht notwendig, aber auch nicht schlimm.
Aber motor_vehicle=designated? Das würde ja bedeuten, dass hier ein blaues Gebotsschild steht und dieser Weg explizit für Motorfahrzeuge gedacht ist?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Haweier (2021-01-06 06:21:17+00:00): Hi Shaun das Schaf,
Du hast recht, ich werde es korrigieren.
Grüße,
Haweier
jmapb (2021-06-05 01:56:11+00:00): Hi, what's the source for the name you added to this service road?
kumrnls (2021-06-08 08:04:05+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for reviewing my changeset. I've used Tiger data as source for the road name, Apologies for the incorrect road classification.I'll ensure not to repeat such errors.
Looking forward to learn more from you. 

Regards,
kumrnls
Anton Khorev (2021-01-06 20:49:49+00:00): Hello.

Recently you along with other users were editing this road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/885527284

In a few days you made over two thousand edits, however each of these edits didn't change the road much: https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/885527284

Can you explain the purpose of these edits?

Best regards  
Anton Khorev  
Data Working Group
datendelphin (2021-01-06 16:20:53+00:00): Sind das öffentliche oder private Parkplätze? Falls dies Besucher oder private Parkplätze sind, bitte ein access=private tag hinzufügen
Nirox (2021-01-06 16:22:16+00:00): Die sind öffentlich, gegen Gebühr.
datendelphin (2021-01-06 17:59:02+00:00): Dann empfehle ich noch ein fee=yes tag :) Danke für die schnelle Antwort. Happy mapping
xkillah (2021-01-12 09:02:55+00:00): "Дорога во двор Герцена 20" не является названием этой дороги. Если вам очень хочется добавить описание к дороге, можете воспользоваться общим тегом description. Также обратите внимание, что highway=living_street обозначаются только дороги со знаком "Жилая зона". Для обычные дворовых проездов highway=service. Подробнее о выборе тегов дорог: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification#.D0.9A.D0.BB.D0.B0.D1.81.D1.81.D0.B8.D1.84.D0.B8.D0.BA.D0.B0.D1.86.D0.B8.D1.8F_.D0.B4.D0.BE.D1.80.D0.BE.D0.B3_.D0.B2.D0.BD.D1.83.D1.82.D1.80.D0.B8_.D0.BD.D0.B0.D1.81.D0.B5.D0.BB.D0.B5.D0.BD.D0.BD.D1.8B.D1.85_.D0.BF.D1.83.D0.BD.D0.BA.D1.82.D0.BE.D0.B2
many852123 (2021-01-07 06:11:56+00:00): These images are made by your mind and have no credibility and do not constantly try to enter incorrect information in the map
RemiBovard (2021-01-14 11:08:09+00:00): Salut Vince!
Je pense qu'il y a un soucis avec ta modification sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/198205080, ça ne devrait pas être tagué en `building=yes`
A+
Rémi
V-guzz (2021-01-14 11:12:30+00:00): Ha oui en effet ! Merci pour le message. C'est corrigé :)
RemiBovard (2021-01-14 13:30:10+00:00): Top ! Merci pour ta réactivité
dvdhoven (2021-01-05 13:04:14+00:00): asphalt en paved zijn in feite het zelfde.
paved betekend verhard zonder een specifieke aanduiding van de wegdeksoort.
Als je klinkers bedoeld, dan is het paving_stones.
yvecai (2021-01-05 19:43:20+00:00): Bonjour Nimag, et bienvenue !
Bon travail, d'autant qu'il manque quelques pistes à mapper autour de Pontarlier.
Sur OSM, il n'y a pas tant d'erreur à faire, chacun rajoute un bout et c'est toute la carte qui s'amélore.
yvecai (2021-01-05 19:54:36+00:00): Bon, comme il y a toujours moyen de s'améliorer quand même, 2 remarques:
La ronde des ferme était déjà présente dans OSM, quoique incompléte , ici:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/104199#map=14/46.9385/6.4161
La votre est là:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/104199#map=14/46.9385/6.4161
Vous auriez pu améliorer celle-ci en la complétant. D'autant que l'ancienne version semble utiliser des chemins existant aussi l'été.
Autre possibilité de copmpléter, ajouter les tags de difficulté et le type de damage (classic+skating je suppose) sur chaque chemin empruntés par la relation.

Une note: lorsque l'on fait une relation route, en général elle est constituée de plusieurs chemin que l'on rassemble dans la route. Aux chemin les propriété des chemins (difficulté, damage), à la route les propriétés globales (couleur, nom).

Bonne continuation,
Yves
Lejun (2021-01-06 10:36:39+00:00): Petit commentaire également de ma part. Comme l’a dit *Yves* c’est globalement du bon travail (en particulier avec le support limité de iD pour les relations), dommage que la piste existait déjà dans OSM.

Pour éviter cela à l’avenir, un outil comme [WayMarkedTrail](https://slopes.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=14!46.9269!6.3548) peut s’avérer utile. L’outil ne se limite pas aux sports d’Hiver et on retrouve également des itinéraires pédestres ou à vélo.

Pour ce qui est des attributs utilisés cela semble assez simple et pourrait être étoffé selon les éléments du [wiki](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Piste_Maps) et un [guide OpenSnowMap](https://www.opensnowmap.org/iframes/how-to-eng.html). À noter que pour le [chemin](https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/892216147) (redondant avec les traces existantes) l’attribut «piste:grooming=classic+skating» le signe «+» devrait être remplacé par «;», un standard OSM.

Si besoin, n’hésite pas à me contacter en privé pour corriger tout ça. Et si l’envie te prenait de continuer à travailler sur des *relations* pourquoi ne pas essayer [JOSM](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM) ?
yvecai (2021-01-06 12:18:23+00:00): Ah, je n'y pensais plus, mais j'avais mis à jour la version française pour iD:
https://www.opensnowmap.org/iframes/how-to-fra.html
Yves - opensnowmap.org
03142 (2021-01-06 08:13:25+00:00): https://ibb.co/9ryxhn5
https://ibb.co/d2KYt1j
https://ibb.co/FWvFrR4
https://ibb.co/VNVhrMd
s8evq (2021-01-06 08:12:05+00:00): Hi Adri2984, Thanks for editing OSM. I have reverted this changeset, because we normally don't add access conditions as a name on objects. Rather use "access=".
s8evq (2021-01-06 08:11:44+00:00): Hi Adri2984, Thanks for editing OSM. I have reverted this changeset, because we normally don't add access conditions as a name on objects. Rather use "access=".
s8evq (2021-01-06 08:11:11+00:00): Hi Adri2984, Thanks for editing OSM. I have reverted this changeset, because we normally don't add access conditions as a name on objects. Rather use "access=".
tonyf1 (2022-11-04 11:10:44+00:00): see changeset/112144836
WandererEarth edits
ndm (2021-01-05 19:20:03+00:00): Did you recently survey it? Is this removed now?
ndm (2021-01-06 20:47:07+00:00): Ok, I've added this back.
willisturm (2021-01-12 17:13:07+00:00): Hi ndm
I removed it, because there was an error: highway=tram_post was wrong. There are still errors: Man_made=post does not exist in OSM. Railway=tram must be a way, not a node. Do you mean railway=tram_stop? I can't see a tram_stop. If you mean the monument, this is historic=pillory (look at the wiki). Best regards Willi
ndm (2021-01-12 17:30:00+00:00): OpenStreetMap uses free form tags the wiki is purely for information you should not remove information that is valid, but not defined in the wiki.
ndm (2021-01-12 23:37:45+00:00): https://www.bing.com/maps?osid=3c212b41-b017-454d-b918-b8d03eba7dcf&cp=51.448859~-2.584636&lvl=19&dir=51.95298&pi=2.8457613&style=x&mo=om.1~z.0.48&v=2&sV=2&form=S00027 -- It used to hold the electric cable when Bristol had a tram system.
user_5359 (2021-01-05 16:02:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM because your business is not the street. If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. Please try again to mark the main place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
Frans S (2021-01-08 12:54:35+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping
I am sorry to say that your mappings are a bit below Par
Here is a summery with issues. The explanation can be found on attached document
A: Not accurate mapped
D: nodes connected to other buildings, 
E: Most buildings not squared

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit?usp=sharing
Best regards
user_2066394 (2021-03-19 21:02:11+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/100559402
muchichka_s (2021-01-05 11:37:59+00:00): Перед тим як таке робити почитайте будь ласка правила позначення адміністративно-територіального устрою в Україні. Не видаляйте більше точки населених пунктів!!!
gektor1488 (2021-01-05 12:01:06+00:00): Я не проти, щоб уникнути засвоєння назви, давайте приберемо назву з плейс-віллаж?
muchichka_s (2021-01-05 12:02:28+00:00): Вибачте, не зрозумів, що ви маєте на увазі
gektor1488 (2021-01-05 12:04:30+00:00): у мене в профілі номер телеграму, можете мені написати, щоб я скинув Вам скрін?