piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2019-12-14 23:31:25+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
EdLoach (2019-12-21 13:00:22+00:00): Thank you. After splitting the roundabout after someone merged it I was going to get around to fixing the routes. I just went to do so and found you got there first. I'd be interested to know how you spotted them?
MacLondon (2019-12-21 17:18:35+00:00): Errors with routes tagged with "public_transport:version=2" get highlighted at
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=0.57186&lat=51.71202&zoom=12&overlays=ptv2_routes_invalid,ptv2_error_ways. 'Errors' would include gaps and misordering of route members, or use of role=forward/backward/etc.

It gets updated daily at about 11pm UK time.

I only rectified PTv2 bus routes, so any other bus routes here might need looking at.
EdLoach (2019-12-21 18:02:12+00:00): Thanks. I think all routes that stop at any bus stops in the Tendring, Colchester or Maldon district have all been updated to v2 - I wrote a validation tool to compared what is in OSM (at v2) to what is in the Open Datasets and I try to run it every week or so to check for changes. Today I got around to adding a check for gaps in the route and wondered why I was only seeing about 6 (another roundabout that had been merged again). Those now hopefully fixed too. Will bookmark the link you gave. The opendata comparison tool I used is in github https://github.com/EdLoach/CheckPublicTransportRelations
bxl-forever (2020-10-23 12:36:43+00:00): Hello,
We are quite puzzled about some of your edits.  Not sure whether those are mistakes.

"Standbeelden zonder naam (deel 1)": is that how the artist named his work?  A real name?  Or you saw that artwork and didn’t see a name?  In that case, we have appropriate tags such as noname=yes.
But I prefer to ask before deleting what we believe is incorrect data on the map.

Same goes for "Koning Boudewijn I standbeeld".  There is artwork_type=bust, that should be enough.  Is the "standbeeld" really part of the official name of the artwork?  Also, you seem to insist that the names of everything is exclusively in Dutch, was that intended?
JessieClos (2020-10-23 14:07:37+00:00): Hello

Same answer for these questions, the names written are the official Dutch names for the artworks. Those names were given by its creators and and are still being used by the city of Jette.

Same goes for all my other edits.


Greetings
Jessie
JessieClos (2020-10-23 14:11:19+00:00): Moreover,

"Standbeeld zonder naam (deel 1)" and "Standbeeld zonder naam (deel 2)" are two pieces of art becoming one image if you are standing on the right place. This was how its creator intended it to be.
bxl-forever (2020-10-23 16:06:22+00:00): OK, good to know.  Not a mistake, then.
muralito (2019-12-15 03:04:17+00:00): Hola.

¿Porque eliminas los edificios?
RCA7HEAD (2019-12-15 13:21:58+00:00): en el trascurso de hoy los voy hacer nuevos y agregar todos los que faltan .. algunos programas buscan solos los puntos .. es decir el edicio es la estrutura por ejemplo en el supermecado dia el edicio no tiene que decir supermercado dia tiene que ser la estructura (material etc) sin estar indicado que es el DIA .. el dia tiene que ser un punto que seria supermercado  . de esta forma el programa busca pdi .. tambian voy agregar los pdi del transporte (coletiivo) que cambiaron de lugar .. aunque en unos dias por la restructuracion que esta haciendo el municipio habra que acomodarlos de nuevo
muralito (2019-12-15 16:43:00+00:00): Te entiendo y te explico un par de cosas que me parece estamos entendiendo diferente.

Si queres podes cambiar el POi a un nodo, pero no por eso tenes que borrar el edificio (building=* y tags asociados), basta con solo borrarle los tags del POI al way y agregarselos a un nodo.

Es mas, algún colaborador antes que vos se tomo el trabajo de mapear esos edificios, por eso entiendo que no esta bien borrarlos (salvo que se hayan demolido o alterado en algo).

Por otro lado, no es necesariamente incorrecto que los tags del POI esten en el way, eso es lo que documenta la wiki.

Es mas, si se marca un edificio o perimetro grande, en general ademas se marca la entrada con un nodo entrance=yes o entrance=main, asi por ejemplo, un navegador encuentra a donde queres ir (en el way) y te manda a la entrada asociada (el nodo entrance), cosa que es sobre todo importante en predios grandes que podrian entrar por varias calles.

Si algunos programas buscan solo puntos, tendrias que reclamarle a los programadores que busquen también en ways (y en relaciones tambien, porque no), porque un POI es tan válido en un nodo, como en un way, como en una relacion.
RCA7HEAD (2019-12-15 18:44:58+00:00): ok !! el que mapeo todos los edificios fui yo .. y si miras los cambios nuevos estoy actualizando todos los edificios y areas .. esta bien los datos que vos me pasas .. revisa las modificaciones nueva que hice estan mucho mejor que antes
user_5359 (2019-12-14 05:00:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please move your node from the street to main building!
viloan (2019-12-14 04:25:32+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt
Se você está mapeando por causa do jogo do Harry Potter, as dicas e explicações na página anterior também são úteis para você.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2020-12-22 06:59:49+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/755359306: Is the admin_level value correct?
user_5359 (2019-12-14 04:55:59+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I am sorry bt on the aerial image I see a pier (see https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpier). Have also a look on the warning of the dock page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Ddock : Caution: In North American English the term dock is also used for a pier for which the tag man_made=pier should be used.)
chetcheckit (2019-12-14 05:11:28+00:00): Um er... where this floating “dock” is.  Roughly 300 yards from where I stays... it’s called a dock. 
Please refer to:  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/(Sittin%27_On)_The_Dock_of_the_Bay

A pier is something one would go stand on. This is definitely something more along the lines of the sitting class which imperically identifies it as a dock. 
If I were to go ask said structure what it would identify itself as if quizzed... It would definitely say something along the lines of dock.

If a boat or dingy were to happen along in said lake, and I asked said boat or dingy where would you like to tie off on, the land or that thing over there... the boat or dingy would surely say, "sir, would you please tie me off at the dock."
user_5359 (2019-12-14 05:34:15+00:00): I don't doubt they have any local knowledge, but OSM is an international project that has agreed to speak British English. 
Therefore, there is also a Wiki that tries to describe the subtle linguistic differences so that such differences can be detected. 
It says that a dock is a ship repair station.
Supaplex (2019-12-15 13:27:26+00:00): I don't think using footway as the outer boundary is a good idea. Maybe use two separate line for footway and boundary.
jidanni (2019-12-15 20:48:22+00:00): Actually that is exactly what I did at first.
(Too bad there is no "Undo" like in Wikipedia.)
Then the next day I decided that since these trails are even a better approximation of the ridgeline than my lines, I chose the trails instead.
And mainly because these village boundaries are fluid in the first place:
See 我兩個評論
https://data.gov.tw/dataset/7438
（作者 "j****i"）.
However, yes your's is a good idea.
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/7127
jidanni (2019-12-15 20:52:12+00:00): Yes originally I wanted to make a copy of the trail:
https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/72089/id-editor-copy-a-line-in-place
so changes in the trail wouldn't affect the boundary.
Anyway you are welcome to Undo it back to my previous version.
It takes many many steps in iD.
jidanni (2019-12-15 20:55:13+00:00): However as this trail is a much higher quality boundary than the ones in the government's 村里界檔， let's wait until the government fixes that file and see what their new version is.
mbethke (2019-12-14 05:49:55+00:00): No, really, water=tank doesn't exist. It makes no sense because there are other tags that do the same. Also, please don't add any reference numbers to the name, they just make the map confusing for everyday users. If those are internal references from the Water Board or something, the "ref" tag is where they can go. That way you can retrieve an object by reference without having that number rendered on the map for everybody else.

cheers,
Matthias
hoangvietanh (2019-12-14 04:56:04+00:00): fdd
wille (2020-03-10 10:13:18+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e está quase tudo correto! A única correção que eu fiz foi conectar as ciclovias às ruas que ela cruza.

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/78399168
Supaplex (2020-01-03 14:48:52+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
wille (2020-03-10 09:40:08+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! É muito importante para nós ter sua colaboração. Fiz algumas correções em sua edição, pois esta ciclovia já havia sido mapeada no mesmo caminho que a rua.
Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/78399465
wille (2020-03-10 10:18:39+00:00): Olá,

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições ao OpenStreetMap! Revisei essa edição e fiz a conexão da ciclovia com as ruas.

Caso tenha alguma dúvida, pode entrar em contato comigo.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/78399493
user_5359 (2019-12-14 15:44:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your changeset because your business is not the street. Please try again to mark the place of your business (and not the street) to add your business information.
mapman44 (2019-12-14 19:02:59+00:00): Thanks for the address information you added. Just a note...please use uppercase letters for the state abbreviation, i.e. "OR", not "or." I fixed this one.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/78400263
mavl (2019-12-16 16:18:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78482242 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3335].
SomeoneElse (2019-12-16 00:41:02+00:00): Thanks for fixing these!
Best Regards,
Andy
aharvey (2019-12-14 21:03:56+00:00): We discussed this at https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/77842957 technically the cycle lane is still there, but bicycles aren't allowed to use it so bicycle=no.
emvee (2019-12-14 22:24:00+00:00): Yes, right, missed that.

Is your opinion that in this case cycleway=lane should remain?
aharvey (2019-12-14 22:34:22+00:00): Yes the infrastructure is still existing on the ground, but an access restriction is in place (which has spanned > 1 year). cycleway=lane + bicycle=no is the best way to model the real world situation.
emvee (2019-12-15 07:49:53+00:00): Makes sense, I did restore cycleway=lane

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/78423593
aharvey (2019-12-14 20:58:55+00:00): could you elaborate on the problem with cycleway=shoulder? I know it's weakly defined but does have some documentation at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:cycleway
emvee (2019-12-14 22:19:05+00:00): The problem with "cycleway=shoulder" in this case is that the ways are marked as "bicycle=no".

Looking better at the surrounding ways of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/171583679, the situation is inconsistent. One side you are allowed to cycle the other side not.
aharvey (2019-12-15 12:17:32+00:00): Okay sorry. I think this change is good, unlike a cycle lane which has a painted bicycle or other signage, a shoulder doesn't indicate bicycles, so I think in this case if bicycle access is not permitted then cycleway=shoulder doesn't make sense.
ChehrehBargi (2020-01-03 19:02:31+00:00): با سلام
شما در ویرایش شکل هندسی، ویرایش های صحیح را خراب کرده اید. ضربدری کردن چهارراه برای بهتر کردن وضعیت آن است. در توضیحات هم آورده شده که تغییرات را دست کاری نکنید.
Saeed SJ (2020-01-06 04:23:44+00:00): سلام
دلیل اصرار شما برای این نحوه رسم چیست؟ رسم ضربدری کاملا غیر اصولی است. ضمن اینکه این چهارراه محدودیت گردش دارد.
Mahdi Nameghi (2020-01-06 05:13:55+00:00): سلام دوست عزیز
شیوه رسم ضربدری چهارراه در هیچ جای osm دیده نشده. میشه بفرمایید رفرنس شما برای این شیوه ترسیم چیست؟
منظور شما از بهتر شدن وضعیت چیه؟ 
ضمنا اگه در گروه تلگرامی osm ایران عضو هستید خوشحال میشم بحث رو اونجا مطرح کنیم شاید با همفکری دیگران بهتر به نتیجه برسیم.
ممنون از توجه تون
ChehrehBargi (2020-01-09 08:10:17+00:00): باسلام
اوکی نظر خوبی هست
PT-53 (2019-12-17 09:13:58+00:00): Hallo Alex-r95,
Straßen im Bau werden mit der Merkmal-Kombination
highway=construction +
construction=* (z.B. residential)
gekennzeichnet.
Du hast an dieser Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24365602/history
das Merkmal
highway=construction
in highway=residential abgeändert, das Merkmal
construction=residential
aber nicht gelöscht. Damit ist die Straße für Navis immer noch gesperrt:
http://brouter.de/brouter-web/#map=17/47.75559/8.85737/standard&lonlats=8.859508,47.757481;8.853629,47.756493&profile=car-eco
Löscht Du das - jetzt unnötige und falsche - Merkmal construction=* noch?
Fragende Grüße
PT-53 (2019-12-17 09:16:52+00:00): PS:
Bei dieser Straße
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/27919629/history
ist das gleiche.
PT-53 (2020-01-06 10:57:27+00:00): erledigt
AndersAndersson (2019-12-15 10:55:19+00:00): Do you edit the map via Neshan?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Neshan
Restoring 13 year old nodes keep happening to you involved in the Neshan project.
You should investigate what is happening and correct it. Otherwise I think Neshan should be banned from OSM.
AndersAndersson (2019-12-16 22:10:48+00:00): آیا نقشه را از طریق Neshan ویرایش می کنید؟
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fa:Neshan
بازیابی گره های 13 ساله برای شما درگیر پروژه Neshan می شود.
شما باید درباره آنچه اتفاق می افتد تحقیق کنید و آن را اصلاح کنید. در غیر این صورت فکر می کنم Neshan باید از OSM ممنوع شود.
nshz (2019-12-19 04:57:52+00:00): Hi, I think the problem is that we have another database, and sometimes it is mistakenly uploaded and causes the editing range to be large. I thought there was a problem with the plugin but now I think the problem is the database.
4004 (2019-12-15 22:55:01+00:00): в лапенках, серьезно? на дому?
4004 (2019-12-15 22:55:52+00:00): а, нашел в минздрав реестре. спасибо за данные!
4004 (2019-12-15 22:56:57+00:00): 24б это тот дом, что ближе к дороге?
literan (2019-12-14 12:34:21+00:00): все верно, только разделитель между номерами, если не ошибасюь, должен быть ;
abakus_uploader (2019-12-14 23:31:24+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mavl (2019-12-14 15:41:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78409864 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
abakus_uploader (2019-12-14 23:31:23+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mueschel (2019-12-19 11:46:00+00:00): Hi,
could you check this node? It got a strange tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7056245918

Thanks@
Bakhadir (2019-12-19 12:00:05+00:00): Hello, thanks for the comments. Fixed tag error
mavl (2019-12-25 15:37:49+00:00): Здравствуйте, ForstEK.  
На этот пакет правок пожаловались как на необсуждённое массовое редактирование.  
Пожалуйста, в будущем перед массовыми правками ставьте участников в известность (например, на форуме в теме https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=64443 ).  
  
Владимир Маршинин  
Рабочая группа по данным
ForstEK (2019-12-25 19:18:28+00:00): Хорошо, спасибо за предупреждение, буду извещать. Просто было выполнено небольшое упорядочивание с "улица Комсомольская" на "Комсомольская улица" согласно указанной ссылке на соглашение по адресации (в названии пакета правок). Подобные массовые правки проводит iWowik по своему валидатору, не думал, что моя аналогичная правка вызовет вопросы.
ortho_is_hot (2019-12-14 14:47:17+00:00): G'day Evgin78, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm commenting because I noticed you requested a review of this changeset.

The classification of the roads you have made all appear to be correct. I see you've changed the two roads leading into the parking lot from a parking aisle to a generic service road in a later changeset, which is more correct.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
mavl (2019-12-14 15:41:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 78409864 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: an incompatible source].
ortho_is_hot (2019-12-14 14:48:07+00:00): G'day Evgin78, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm commenting because I noticed you requested a review of this changeset.

Your change of classification to these roads are correct, as the roads leading in do not provide direct access to parking spaces.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
ortho_is_hot (2019-12-14 14:51:20+00:00): G'day Evgin78, and welcome to OpenStreetMap. I'm commenting because I noticed you requested a review of this changeset.

The parking aisle that you have added appears to be correct. If you *really* want to get into specifics, then the way between  https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6474307587 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7056276349 is technically just a service road not a parking aisle, but it's really a minor thing anyway.

Cheers,
ortho_is_hot
pio2_122 (2019-12-14 11:15:14+00:00): Dlaczego podzieliłeś drogę na tyle części?
Azquoir (2019-12-16 07:47:38+00:00): Żeby móc otagować zatoczki na przystankach
Johnny Mapperseed (2019-12-14 11:16:26+00:00): Also used RapiD for buildings
SomeoneElse (2019-12-14 11:24:26+00:00): The previous alignment here was presumably from OS BoundaryLine, Bing and guesswork, where  OS BoundaryLine presumably was where the river was some time ago and presumably is where the boundary still is - officially at least.  OSSV is likely to be where the river was a few years ago but won't suffer the offset issues that Bing might.  Where Bing and OSSV differ it looks like a Bing offset issue rather than "river has moved" - the difference is on the "wrong side" of some river bends to suggest river channel movement.  I've therefore gone with the OSSV alignment for this bit.
EneaSuper (2019-12-15 09:17:48+00:00): Ciao, dici che i lampioni erano da mappare in questa maniera?
Arthtoach (2019-12-14 11:32:16+00:00): Wrong changeset description. Actually adding buildings.
StephaneP (2019-12-20 14:10:30+00:00): Re,
Hmm tu es sûr de toi pour l'ajout du tiret sur le nom de la Rue des Petites Écuries ? C'est le terrain qui prime, et pas Fantoir.
JensVonZobel (2021-04-22 12:25:04+00:00): Why is this name not shown? Other seas' names are shown on OSM.
!bm (2019-12-14 19:14:03+00:00): Hallo SuperFLoh, willkommen zu OSM! In deinen bisherigen Änderungssätzen (Cs 78405522,78404335,78405752,78405797) hast du name=* für Ladestationen gesetzt. Ich denke, es handelt sich dabei nicht um vor Ort ersichtliche sondern deskriptive. Deshalb habe ich diese wieder entfernt (Cs 78414633,78414718). Beachte dazu bitte: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names --besteGrüße!bm
SuperFLoh (2019-12-15 08:55:01+00:00): Hallo, wie ist denn ein geeigneter Name? An der Ladesäule steht groß Vattenfall. https://www.goingelectric.de/stromtankstellen/photos/85e709be255ce400d755c7c4757e411c/1000/ 
Also "Vattenfall Ladesäule"?
Viele Grüße,
Florian