piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
dx125 (2020-07-04 00:24:17+00:00): Hallo,
Du hast in Deinem Changeset sehr viele Straßen - begleitende Fußwege ersatzlos gelöscht. Du hättest die Straßen dann zumindest um einen tag "sidewalk" (right/left/both) ergänzen müssen, damit die Information zu den Fußwegen nicht verloren geht. 
Freundliche Grüße
dx125 (2020-07-04 23:06:38+00:00): Du hast in einem weiteren Changeset die sidewalk an den Straßen ergänzt.
Danke ;:-)
luiswoo (2020-07-04 04:28:55+00:00): и зачем?
Something B (2020-07-04 07:41:18+00:00): Для того, чтобы определить дефолтное название для рендеров, не принимающих name:lang = * (некоторым очень хочется видеть подпись на osm-carto).
luiswoo (2020-07-04 08:03:29+00:00): Где указано, какой предназначен язык для дефолтного названия в данном случае?
Something B (2020-07-04 08:06:33+00:00): Я не думаю, что это где-то прописано, но выбор языка очевиден.
luiswoo (2020-07-04 08:10:46+00:00): Ну вот нужно сначала прописать, а потом это действительно станет очевидным. Сейчас это совершенно не так.
BCNorwich (2020-07-05 07:27:00+00:00): Hi, 
Almost all of these service highways tagged as golf cartpaths look wrong. They mostly are polygons, paths usually go from one place to another. Further some cartpaths are drawn outside of the golf course outline and somewhat distant to the playing areas. Some paths are drawn over water areas.

This changeset is rather large and I can't clearly make out what you are trying to achieve. I would suggest reverting it completely so that no anomalies are left by trying to correct things. If you need help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
AlanChatfield (2020-07-05 10:47:39+00:00): Hi Bernard,
yes sorry these are temporary. It is because I am transferring data from OSM for a project I'm doing and trees don't come across very well so I have delineated the trees boundaries with one of the few data coverages that does come across. It is just for data transfer purposes and these will be removed in the next few days,
best wishes,
Alan
BCNorwich (2020-07-05 13:52:08+00:00): Hello Alan,
Please understand that OSM is a live worldwide database. Data is constantly being used to compile thousands of maps. So folk could at this very minute be downloading your temporary data. If there's someone specifically downloading golfing data his map is going to be corrupt.
Although in this case the corrupt data is of minor importance this should not happen. Might I suggest you use JOSM to compile temporary data that can then be stored offline, not uploaded. Or even that you use a sandbox utility.

You say the data is not for OSM, then it ought be reverted ASAP.

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2020-07-05 13:56:19+00:00): Hi Alan, My apologies I hadn't realised that you'd made corrections.
Regards Bernard.
AlanChatfield (2020-07-05 13:58:31+00:00): HI Bernard, the data I have added *is* of use to all, it is an accurate reflection of the golf course with key features added. I know because I was a member of this course for over 10 years. The temporary data I mentioned was just that, very temporary and has been removed already.
AlanChatfield (2020-07-05 14:02:38+00:00): OK sorry I responded to your previous comment and have just seen your apologies. OK no problem. Nothing wrong with checking the integrity of the data and great that you were doing so, but I do you were being a little over-zealous given my earlier response.
tastrax (2020-07-10 03:39:39+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added according to the following format +61 x xxxx xxxx, or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM. I am also not sure that the Bavarian Grill House is in the correct location. Cheers
SomeoneElse (2021-05-01 10:46:04+00:00): Hello KoffEEkrönog

I hope you don't mind me asking about something added to OpenStreetMap many years ago. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822688774 was edited here with a "source=Google Maps" tag on it. We can't actually use that as a source in OSM because the Google's licence doesn't allow it to be used here. Also, we can't use "Bing Maps", but we can use the Bing (and other) aerial imagery available within OSM editors.  If it's somewhere that you've actually been and are familiar with (and I'm guessing that it might be) then "local_knowledge" is a perfectly good source for OSM.

If not, then we'll have to remove Google-sourced things that you've added to OSM.

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group
Supaplex (2020-07-04 07:31:43+00:00): 另外，也請不要用與 OpenStreetMap 授權不相容的國土測繪中心影像，請使用編輯器當中所附的影像。不然最嚴重將會被禁止編輯 OpenStreetMap。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87519543
osmviborg (2020-07-04 05:44:57+00:00): Recommended reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree
Supaplex (2020-07-04 07:09:38+00:00): 為什麼要移除樹木呢?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87519694
Supaplex (2020-07-04 07:30:35+00:00): 另外，也請不要用與 OpenStreetMap 授權不相容的國土測繪中心影像，請使用編輯器當中所附的影像。不然最嚴重將會被禁止編輯 OpenStreetMap。
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/87519694
eggie (2020-07-04 05:51:02+00:00): Beste   ...  Door schuiven met de kaart in edit modus heb je 
addr:housenumber	15	Johan de Wittlaan verplaatst naar een andere plek. Met editor iD heb je vaak schade door onbedoelde verplaatsingen. 
Verder kun je beter PDOK actueel op de achtergrond zetten ipv Esri. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-07-04 05:52:34+00:00): Adresnode teruggeplaatst. Dit waren je edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=87519754
Vinbalinka (2020-07-04 11:08:31+00:00): Oke
eggie (2020-07-04 11:18:10+00:00): Editor iD is een kleine ramp op zich.
Vaak dus schade door verschuivingen. je dit met links en je schuift met links. we zien het doorlopen. Kwalijk doen nemen we het niemand.
Bi JOSM schuif je met rechts en kan het minder snel gebeuren.
Overweeg de overstap nu je toch de smaak te pakken hebt.
Meer overzicht en een goede validator.
editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710       

even weer wennen, maar dan heb je ook wat
Succes,
eggie
Vinbalinka (2020-07-04 12:02:02+00:00): Ik heb JOSM gedownload en zal er zo even naar kijken
Frans S (2020-07-04 13:27:59+00:00): Hello
I reviewed this task. 4 buildings wer connected by nodes. please don't  connect buildings together like that. This forced also non squared buildings, because this effect the squaring.
Best regards
Supaplex (2020-07-16 13:10:12+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers
組織性編輯指南：https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站  https://osm.tw/
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/openstreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
eggie (2020-07-04 05:55:54+00:00): access=no verwijderd van paaltje moped en mofa yes toegevoegd
eggie (2020-07-04 05:59:34+00:00): Routes bewerken met editor iD kan eigenlijk niet. Het geeft schade . Wel met editor JOSM.
Kijk eens naar editor josm stap voor stap
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710   
Gr eggie
Carnildo (2020-07-04 07:49:40+00:00): Could you change how you go about expanding business nodes into building outlines?  The way you're doing it right now, it loses information such as the address of the Shady Sprurce Hostel, or the fact that the Sinclair station sells diesel.
user_5359 (2020-07-04 05:05:16+00:00): Hello! Please notice the difference between description and name. You didn't need a tag name="Residential Home" if you has the tag building=residential.
eggie (2020-07-04 05:41:54+00:00): Dag Vinbalinka.. motor_vehicle=no is al default.
Wel kun je nu  toevoegen moped=yes en mofa=yes omdat die als motorvoertuigen worden gezien in OSM.
Kijk je nog even?

MVG,
Eggie
Vinbalinka (2020-07-04 11:08:56+00:00): doe ik
eggie (2020-07-04 05:47:39+00:00): Beste..  Je voegt hier zoveel afslagbeperkingen toe die geen enkele functie hebben.. Waarom daar mee doorgaan?
Het enige dat nodig is is de afslagbeperking om te voorkomen dat je de scherpe bocht terug wil maken.
MVG,
Eggie

MVG,
Eggie
DUGA (2021-07-02 13:54:27+00:00): Please do not tag convenience store as part of the gas station.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/822715935/history#map=19/42.40796/-77.22227
gscholz (2020-07-31 06:05:16+00:00): Hi Carlos,
your recent changesets have created a big amount of errors in the OSM database regarding overapping streets:

tus conjuntos de cambios recientes han creado una gran cantidad de errores en la base de datos de OSM con respecto a las calles que se superponen:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-100.43445&lat=22.09162&zoom=9&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
¿Puedes por favor arreglar esto?

Guido
gscholz (2020-08-07 06:26:42+00:00): Hi Carlos,
can you please respond to my request?

¿Puedes responder a mi solicitud?

Guido
dieterdreist (2021-01-12 13:18:58+00:00): Hi, I noticed you removed the amenity=hospice tag. Can you explain the reasoning?
dieterdreist (2021-01-12 13:23:45+00:00): strange, another town where you removed an amenity=hospice tag? There is no reason to remove it, you did not set a different amenity tag. I believe this is part of a disguised undiscussed edit.
Adamant1 (2021-01-12 20:46:22+00:00): Oh goody, are we back to the false accusations of "disguised undiscussed edits" again? This is a part of the same exact supposedly "disguised" edits you and SomeoneElse accused me of before that you never provided any evidence for, that went know where, Woodpeck said I didn't do, and that you've already apologized for falsely accusing me of. 

Good job doing just as little research Etc. Etc. this time around before you make accusations as you did last time. 

If you think this or the changesets where you throw out the same clearly crap accusations should be tagged differently then how I tagged them, feel to just retag them how you think they should be tagged. I could really give a crap, but maybe skip accusing me of things in changesets you disagree with next time. I have better things to waste my time on then reminding you that you've already accused me of the exact same thing and that you've already been told I wasn't doing what your claiming. You should at least be able to keep track of on your own accusations and which ones turned out to be false. I'm not doing it for you over and over.
PT-53 (2021-01-13 07:51:35+00:00): Hallo  Adamant1,
aus der History ergibt sich eindeutig, daß Du das Merkmal
amenity=hospice
gelöscht und dafür das Merkmal
healthcare=hospice
eingetragen hast.
Bei uns ist es üblich beide Merkmale zu verwenden! Bitte beachte dies und nimm Deine Löschung zurück.
Grüße
Adamant1 (2021-01-13 07:53:36+00:00): Sorry, but I don't speak German, Dutch, or whatever language that is.
Adamant1 (2021-01-13 07:59:00+00:00): Never mind. I used Google translate. I disagree that it costumery to use two tags for the exact same thing on a POI. The Wiki says as much and I've had multiple conversations where people have told me so. Especially in cases where  "newer", more widely accepted tags come along and more so when your talking about a tag, amenity=hospice, that has almost zero uses. There is no "costume" when it comes to tags that aren't being used.
Adamant1 (2021-01-13 08:04:03+00:00): That said, as I've said already, just now and six months ago when this originally came up, people are free to this however they want and I could really give a crap how it's tagged. I'm not "withdrawing my deletion" though. Whatever that means. Just because people like you and Dieterdreist feel like harassing someone repeatedly instead of making a basic edit.
dieterdreist (2021-01-13 08:44:31+00:00): Adamant, I take back the "disguised", and I beg your pardon for having forgotten that we have already talked about it. Still, there clearly is an issue, you are remotely editing stuff in an area which you do not know, removing tags that locals have set, without giving a clear reason. Which part of the wiki is about removing tags that you are basing your reasoning upon? I am not aware that the wiki would justify remote mappers removing tags from objects in areas they do not know about.
dieterdreist (2021-01-13 08:50:23+00:00): Btw: the tag has almost zero uses because you and others have removed them in the past months. By the time you removed it, there were still much more than there are now. 
You are right that we could just add the tag back, but we are having this discussion here because you are a very active mapper and as I think there are some misconceptions I believe it is more effective to solve the issues at the root by raising awareness.
Adamant1 (2021-01-13 08:55:27+00:00): People remotely change and remove tags all the time. Almost every edit in OSM is exactly that. It's only an issue in this case because your making it one. 

In this case, as I already told you on the Wiki, which you've seemed to ignore for whatever reason, I looked around the website and didn't feel that it was an amenity more then it is somewhere that provides healthcare. As I've also said repeatedly, your free to disagree, but don't treat me like things can't be determined from websites, that people don't tag things pretty much all day every day based on them, or that I did the edit simply out of pure ignorance. Looking at a website and being like "this doesn't like an amenity" is a pretty clear reason to re-tag something in my book. 

Your "raising awareness" about anything about continuing to go off on someone about something that was already dealt with in other conversations and especially when your basing the whole thing on clearly wrong crap like that people don't routinely map in areas they don't know or that me mapping in Europe when I live in America has anything to do this and not just choosing to continue something because your upset a tag you prefer isn't being used anymore.
Adamant1 (2021-01-13 08:55:51+00:00): "Something that was already resolved.
Adamant1 (2021-01-13 08:56:05+00:00): "Your not raising awareness about anything
Adamant1 (2021-01-13 08:59:55+00:00): Also, if you want to go with the nativist "only tag where you live" crap, cool. You, Polar Bearing, SomeoneElse, Woodpeck, and all the other European mappers that keep mapping around America and telling us America's how to map things, usually rather condescendingly I might add, can stop doing so. Because it's not like any of you know what the hell your doing or talking about half the time. None of you Europeans keep each other and bad attitudes and bad mapping in America in check though. Your all like cult that isn't willing to drink your own nativist cool aid but expects everyone else to. Screw that.
dieterdreist (2021-01-13 09:41:15+00:00): I do not say: only map where you are on the ground, although I believe it is the best. I say do not remove tags from objects, without further discussion with the local community, in places which you do not know and where you do not know the community. Adding things from aerial imagery bears some risk (e.g. outdated imagery) but acceptable, while armchair removing and changing objects without actual on the ground knowledge is a no go.
I am not usually mapping things in the US, I have added occasionally some stuff from aerial imagery or fixed some self intersecting polygon, but I surely wouldn't remove tags to replace them with others of which I suppose they were the same. Don't know about Polar Bearing, SomeoneElse or Woodpeck, but I can confirm they are European.
Adamant1 (2021-01-13 09:50:59+00:00): Cool if that's your standard. That doesn't mean it's anyone else's standard or that there's anything with not doing it "your" way. As I said, plenty of people tag things based what they read about a business it's website. For instance, I highly doubt the vast majority of phone numbers and opening hours for businesses in OSM are from people going into the store and ground surveying. If that was the standard OSM would be in the stone age when it comes to business details. So, again, your making an issue out of nothing over something that literally everyone does all the time. 

For some bizarre reason you seem to stuck on the "ground knowledge" aspect of this. As if that's the only way you can get information or that information gained any other way isn't valid. This isn't 2004 when people mapped things with GPS units. I'm sure even then it wasn't a purely "on the ground" endeavor either though.
Adamant1 (2021-01-13 09:52:37+00:00): BTW, it should obvious that the "one the ground rule" means things have to ground verifiable. Not that "on the ground" is the only way people can add or edit things.
dieterdreist (2021-01-13 09:52:56+00:00): See, you write
"People remotely change and remove tags all the time. Almost every edit in OSM is exactly that. It's only an issue in this case because your making it one.

In this case, as I already told you on the Wiki, which you've seemed to ignore for whatever reason, I looked around the website and didn't feel that it was an amenity more then it is somewhere that provides healthcare."

This is exactly the issue. You have removed someone else's tag (in several instances, i.e. actively looking for it with some search engine and putting some effort into it), without any discussion, because you personally felt it "was not an amenity" - despite the tag even being documented in the wiki.

To me it is more an amenity than about "healthcare". healthcare by the dictionary is about "efforts made to maintain or restore physical, mental, or emotional well-being especially by trained and licensed professionals", while a hospice is not about maintaining or restoring well-being, it is about accepting that you have to die and about letting go.
dieterdreist (2021-01-13 09:56:53+00:00): the "ground" does not tell you whether amenity or healthcare is more appropriate, and whether one of them must be removed or both could be kept (why not?). Being on the ground means you know the general setting, what is customary, the local culture, language etc., requirements to really participate in a discussion with locals.
Adamant1 (2021-01-13 10:08:24+00:00): Since when does every single edit someone makes need to be discussed before they make it? You people act like anything that doesn't involve a ton of graveling to a mailing list before hand isn't valid. No matter how biennial the edit is. Yet, most of the time none of you "things should be discussed" people discuss your own edits before hand. 

What's your definition of a facility? Because that's what it comes down to for me. Since it's what the amenity tag is suppose to be used for. Facilities. I can tell by looking at the website that this isn't a facility. At least not by my definition of one. 

As far as your definition of a hospice versus healthcare goes, I partly agree with you. Except I would caveat that hospice does involve healthcare. By the time my ex's mom was sick enough from cancer to need hospice care, she was to gone from it and high on meds for there to be any "helping her let go and accept death." It was 100% maintaining well being while she was dying by giving her meds and take care of her while she decayed. So, I don't think it's as cut and dry as you think it is. 

On your last comment, in a way I agree with that, but then I just don't think it would be a fruitful form of argumentation to be like "Your clearly ignorant about this because your from Africa" to anyone and it's borderline racist. Sure, it does help to know those things though. Treating people like they are ignorant due to where their from is just not a good way to approach people from different cultures about things.
Adamant1 (2021-01-13 10:09:43+00:00): Especially because pretty much every disagreement can be resolved without needing to take it to that level.
dieterdreist (2021-01-13 10:29:05+00:00): "Since when does every single edit someone makes need to be discussed before they make it?" - while it would be nice when you actually __remove__ what others have bothered to add, it is not strictly a requirement, I agree. When you actually go out and do several of these removals in different cities, i.e. you act systematically, and when there are open disputes on the tagging question, one should generally refrain from creating facts before the problem is solved mutually. I agree that this issue is somehow minor and on the edge because of the relatively small number of objects (around 20 if I recall correctly?). 
In a system like OSM, where tags basically emerge and get approved by people using them, it is toxic to "clean up" things if it is more than just fixing a typo, and when they do not interact with the people who have put the tags.

I also agree that discussing beforehand may not always be practical (many people not responding, would slow down process and require a high level of structure and coordination from the mapper), but what could be done is sending them a short note, so that they can decide to either revert or accept the modifications, and would send you feedback.

Back to healthcare, happy you agree with 
"I don't think it's as cut and dry as you think it is.", and happy you agree that amenity is more suitable than you possbily thought back then. Please also note that "healthcare" is apparently not available to people using the osm2pgsql standard style: https://github.com/openstreetmap/osm2pgsql/blob/master/default.style
SomeoneElse (2020-07-05 14:48:03+00:00): Hello
In what way is this "Improved tags"?  It looks like a stealth mechanical edit to me.  Can you explain where it was discussed with the community?
Best Regards,
Andy
Adamant1 (2020-07-05 14:54:49+00:00): Hello. As Woodpeck just pointed out in the Wiki "NB Dieterdreist's accusation is not correct, only 13 of ~ 200 social_facility=hospice have been last edited by Adamant1." Can you point out where it says anywhere that I need to discuss making 13 edits before hand or how exactly that would qualify as a "stealth mechanical edit"?
Adamant1 (2020-07-05 14:55:14+00:00): Also, please stop spamming my changesets with comments.
Adamant1 (2020-07-05 14:56:30+00:00): Maybe work out one and then go onto the next, but it's not helpful to resolving anything if my email keeps popping up alerts and I have to deal with a bunch of your messages at once.
SomeoneElse (2020-07-05 14:59:23+00:00): For the avoidance of doubt I originally surveyed this and my original tagging was valid.  Have you been in Clay Cross recently?
SomeoneElse (2020-07-05 15:00:07+00:00): Re "Also, please stop spamming my changesets with comments" perhaps you will be dissuaded from doing stealth mechanical edits in the future?
Adamant1 (2020-07-05 15:02:37+00:00): No I won't, because that wasn't what I was doing and if your going to make accusations that I was you should provide a little more evidence then me accidentally writing something wrong in a changeset comment.
Adamant1 (2020-07-05 15:03:24+00:00): Especially one from two months that I don't even remember at this point.