piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 14:19:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Mazda05 (2019-03-06 10:15:28+00:00): uk Садки "ё"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67832183
Ars-UA (2019-03-06 10:23:04+00:00): Блин... Поправьте, пожалуйста )
Mazda05 (2019-03-06 12:13:54+00:00): предлагаю названия без статусной части оставить в объектах в виде short_name:<lg>
Ars-UA (2019-03-06 12:24:21+00:00): Можно.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2019-06-26 08:47:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71627574 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  Attempts to contact the mapper failed.
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 14:17:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 15:06:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 15:06:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 15:05:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 15:06:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-03-06 07:59:49+00:00): the changeset comment should have been "multiple elements added in the 'Kikuxi' area"
ivanbranco (2021-11-14 09:23:27+00:00): Ciao Gianfranco,

per caso ti ricordi cosa dovrebbe rappresentare questa way? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674877273/
Gianfranco2014 (2021-11-15 07:32:41+00:00): é la gradinata davanti alla chiesa.
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 15:06:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 15:06:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Fischkopp0815 (2019-03-06 09:52:55+00:00): Warum jetzt wieder motor_vehicle=yes & motorcycle=yes  an die Bahnstrecke. Die würden an die Straße gehören, sin da aber überflüssig, weil Defaultwerte.
Trohjahn (2019-03-06 14:50:40+00:00): es gibt dort keine STRAßE !!! man fährt auf den schienen !
Nakaner (2019-03-06 15:36:34+00:00): Hallo Trohjahn,

es gibt in OpenStreetMap an dieser Stelle zwei Ways, einen für die Straße, einen für das Gleis. Zugangsbeschränkungs-Tags wie motor_vehicle=* gehören nur an den Straßen-Way. Am Gleis sind sie überflüssig.

Viele Grüße

Michael
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
aceman444 (2020-05-01 00:04:23+00:00): Hi, the intersection (crossing) of the service road and footway does not exist in reality as they are in different levels. Please watch the imagery closely and do not blindly add artificial highway=crossing to silence validator errors, by creating even worse errors. Thanks.
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
marczoutendijk (2022-04-06 08:53:31+00:00): Hi Dear Paul,
In this changeset you have 4 buildings tagged with building=residential + residential=2.
E.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/419641759
What is that residential=2 indicating?
DP24PH (2022-04-07 13:55:21+00:00): OMG! It must be pertaining to building:levels=2 instead, and thank you very much for your feedback! I'll have it corrected through subsequent changesets.


Paul/DP24
Jakka (2019-03-07 08:42:46+00:00): Zoals je ziet heb je hier tweemaal de zelfde benaming toegevoegd https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6320420656#map=19/50.96637/3.98318&layers=N Overdaad schaad meestal ;)
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Dimacn (2019-03-06 18:15:05+00:00): Пожалуйста изучите Вики перед тем как делать массовые изменения. 1. Тег name у highway обозначает название улицы. У вас выдуманные названия улиц. Перенесите информацию в тег description. 2. Статус этой дороги должен быть service или residental. Пожалуйста исправьте. Почитайте про классификацию дорог https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:highway  3. Плохую проходимость нужно выражать тегами surface и smoothness https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:smoothness
Remel220 (2019-03-07 07:45:20+00:00): Спасибо за замечания. Ткните носом,в каком теге написать важное примечание "Грунт, большая яма, колея. В дождь дороги НЕТ." ? И как сделать, чтобы навигатор не вёл по этому участку дороги на основе каких-то данных, а не на основе исключения этой дороги в навигаторе.
Dimacn (2019-03-07 17:07:05+00:00): 1. Важную дополнительную информацию, как уже писал, надо вносить в тег description  -  https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:description
2. Теги для качества дорог - surface, smoothness и tracktype. Ещё есть таблица по качеству дорог - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Danidin9/Variants_of_smooth_surfaces
3. Вопрос про навигатор - это к авторам навигаторов, что бы они полностью анализировали данные в тегах. Да и не понятно как навигатор будет анализировать степень дождя, т.е. дорогу нет или ещё можно проползти?
Remel220 (2019-03-07 22:30:31+00:00): Спасибо за оперативный ответ. Исправил.
mavl (2019-03-08 15:06:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:30:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
dval (2019-05-04 13:06:24+00:00): Здравствуйте, Александр! С каких пор часть реки Каква в районе Каквинской улицы и улицы Левый Берег Каквы перестала существовать? Смотрю, в этом районе реке после Ваших правок каша полная. Например исчезла с карты поверхность реки, хотя она была до того (мультиполигоны - 2 шт. - не замкнуты), почему-то появились те самые два мультиполигона на одной области поверхности реки (хотя достаточно одного), разорвана единая линия реки (Каква). И это далеко не всё.
Александр_1988 (2019-06-14 05:51:35+00:00): Сейчас проверил. Всё в порядке с рекой. опишиие вопрос яснее.
habi (2020-11-19 13:52:39+00:00): Ciao Wikilux
Ich habe gestern gesehen, dass der Aussichtsturm quasi doppelt erfasst wurde.
Ich habe das mit dem Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94440940 versucht zu homogenisieren.
Fingsch OK?
mavl (2019-03-08 14:18:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67923030 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mueschel (2019-03-07 22:29:36+00:00): Hallo,
du hast hier 56x "type:maxspeed" geschrieben. Richtig hieße es "maxspeed:type".
Schaust du da nochmal drüber?

Danke
PT-53 (2019-03-08 07:17:31+00:00): Erledigt
Ich hoffe, ich habe alle erwischt.

Danke für die Info und Grüße
ndm (2019-03-06 22:58:35+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/673479999 no longer no-entry?
jguthula (2019-03-07 14:44:18+00:00): Hi ndm,

While removing the parking roads from The Co-Operative Food area (As per recent imagery) editor noticed this way being odd. Taking into consideration that a oneway tag should either be assigned for the complete road segment or should not be added at all,  he removed the tag. If you consider this is a wrong edit, do let us know so we will go ahead and revert back our changes. 

Regards,
Jothirnadh
ndm (2019-03-07 21:33:44+00:00): The no entry can be seen at https://binged.it/2tRyE4C

Adding a one-way tag to a short segment of road creates an effective no-entry. Unfortunately JOSM doesn't seem to support a no-entry restriction -- although it looks reasonable from Bing imagery.

Removing the no-entry makes a "quiet change" that breaks the routeing -- it's not a good idea.

FYI: There are other roads in the vicinity with the same tagging style.
jguthula (2019-03-08 12:08:14+00:00): Thanks for your inputs ndm, Added back the oneway.

Regards,
Jothirnadh
hvalentim (2019-03-09 08:12:22+00:00): "Use place=hamlet para identificar um povoado rural que seja maior que uma place=isolated_dwelling e menor que uma place=village."
eggie (2019-03-06 11:06:58+00:00): Voorlopig maar even zo laten. Denk dat Leo zo wel kijkt als voorgaande mapper.
Het is even de vraag of het wel als tunnel gemapt moet worden, want er loopt al een viaduct overheen.
Gr eggie
Leo Slager (2019-03-06 11:21:54+00:00): max hoogte op de verkeersborden is zelfs 3,3 m.
De weg ligt op maaiveldhoogte onder een viaduct. Dus tunnel lijkt mij onjuist.
Leo Slager (2019-03-06 11:28:03+00:00): Overigens dat tunnel=yes staat er al weer meer dan 4 jaar. Staat ook wel leuk voor de renderer :-)
pallih (2019-03-08 15:33:01+00:00): I'm pretty sure this is the listing:

https://www.airbnb.com/rooms/32080123

There clearly is a building in that location, but I'm not sure a Airbnb listing should be on the map, but the building should be.
flother (2019-03-11 16:49:43+00:00): I added the building in changeset 68029684 but after reading the thread at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-March/thread.html#28904 I decided not to include the Airbnb details.
Dimacn (2019-03-06 13:33:40+00:00): Для указания номера дома, используйте тег addr:housenumber  - подробнее https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:addr
SomeoneElse (2019-07-05 15:52:04+00:00): Hello,
What was the source of the access change to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75172615/history ?
Best Regards,
Andy
kmarjbh (2019-07-09 10:39:39+00:00): Hi Andy,Thanks for your suggestion. As per you request I am reverting back my edits made on access tags. Do let me know if you have any further questions.Changeset=72007588
Regards,
kmarjbh.
SomeoneElse (2019-07-09 11:41:38+00:00): Hello kmarjbh,
Thanks for that
Best Regards,
Andy
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
eggie (2019-03-06 10:57:14+00:00): Dag Rm..
highway=road tag je alleen als je niet weet welk type weg het is. 
highway=residential lijkt me het meest aannemelijk.
Al die accesstags zijn niet nodig op reguliere wegen, want die zijn al default. 
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-03-06 10:59:16+00:00): Verder ligt er nog een highway construction onder de brug en is er dus een weg op een weg geplakt.
eggie (2019-03-06 11:04:18+00:00): Ik heb de duplicated way verwijderd (dat is met editor iD niet te doen) en onnodige accesstags weggehaald. Straatnaam toegevoegd.
hvalentim (2019-03-09 08:19:50+00:00): "Use place=hamlet for an isolated settlement, typically with less than 100-200 inhabitants. For a named area within a larger populated place, such as a town, city or village consider using place=suburb or place=neighbourhood."
"Hamlet" até pode fazer sentido para a Fonte da Telha e para as Terras da Costa, não para o resto.
lmagreault (2019-03-08 15:21:53+00:00): Bonjour,
Pourquoi avoir supprimé 2 bancs à Pont-de-Poitte et Piételle (Boissia) ?
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/67838816
ËdzëronK (2019-03-09 16:34:23+00:00): Ok, je vois, je pense que j'ai du passer pour corriger des erreurs sur la même zone que vous étiez en train de contribuer, du coup ça à du être en conflit, je n'ai pas toucher ces objets volontairement.
str (2019-08-14 14:32:27+00:00): Revertoin tämän muutoksen, jossa oli yhdistetty Oluthuone Toppila ja VOR/DME-monisuuntamajakka.
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
hvalentim (2019-03-09 08:09:22+00:00): "Use place=hamlet for an isolated settlement, typically with less than 100-200 inhabitants (...) For a named area within a larger populated place, such as a town, city or village consider using place=suburb or place=neighbourhood."
Frans S (2019-03-16 13:57:22+00:00): Hi,  Thank you for mapping here.
Please pay more attention in following the outlines of the buildings. Lots of buildings  here have extentions and are similar in shape. You use the copy/past command?
when you map 1 building in detail it will improve your mappings.  You can use both Bing and ESRI images for a better view. Correct the offset and you can map from them. be sure the buildings appears also on the Project image (which is the reference) 
Thanks
hvalentim (2019-03-09 08:15:08+00:00): "Use place=hamlet for an isolated settlement, typically with less than 100-200 inhabitants (...) For a named area within a larger populated place, such as a town, city or village consider using place=suburb or place=neighbourhood."
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
solitone (2019-07-29 12:08:18+00:00): Il sentiero che scende da Villa Guardia l’hai percorso 5 mesi fa? Oggi era pulito fino agli orti in fondo alla valletta, ma poi si perdeva nella vegetazione, prima del ponte, e non era più visibile
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-06 11:39:35+00:00): Bâtiments superposés avec ceux de https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67839973 - lorsque vous travaillez à plusieurs sur une zone, répartissez-vous les secteurs ou au moins mettez à jour vos données locales avant d'enregistrer un changeset.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-18 12:15:53+00:00): Corrigé dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68256342
mavl (2019-03-08 15:05:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-06 11:39:22+00:00): Bâtiments superposés avec ceux de https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/67839736 - lorsque vous travaillez à plusieurs sur une zone, répartissez-vous les secteurs ou au moins mettez à jour vos données locales avant d'enregistrer un changeset.
Jean-Marc Liotier (2019-03-18 12:15:58+00:00): Corrigé dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/68256342
mavl (2019-03-08 15:05:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Diógenes de Sinope (2019-03-06 11:25:31+00:00): the changeset comment should have been "multiple elements added along the periphery of the 'Via Expressa Golfe-Camama'"
mueschel (2019-03-12 15:22:47+00:00): Hi, what does 'unsupervised=no' mean? Did you want to write 'crossing=supervised'

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6320609811
GOwin (2019-03-12 22:08:51+00:00): Good catch! Thanks. 

It a typo and should've been `supervised=no`, and it's been fixed
hesdrib (2019-03-06 17:23:31+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Conventions/Highways
BCNorwich (2019-03-06 14:05:20+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to point out to you Brook Country Park is already mapped in relation: (1172820) https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1172820. Thus your two new areas are in fact duplication and triplication of the same named park. I don't think there is a specific "Brook Country Park - Kids Section" and I doubt that would be it's formal name anyway. So I've removed the two areas for you.

If I can help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
ianlopez1115 (2019-03-06 11:34:10+00:00): *updates inside Lifestyle Strip - add recently opened cafe and clothes shop
mavl (2019-03-08 15:06:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67924677 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
kartonage (2019-03-07 04:40:06+00:00): Hallo SAS_Sylt und willkommen bei OSM,

danke für die Aktualisierung der Baustelle. Leider hast du für Gebäude typische Eigenschaften jetzt auf das ganze Feld angewendet, sodass hier jetzt ein riesiger Häuserblock entstanden ist.
Normalerweise hätte ich das einfach angepasst, leider gibt es nur noch keine geeigneten Luftbilder um da nachzuhelfen.
Hast du Vor-Ort-Kentnisse und könntest die Gebäude ungefähr einzeichnen? Das würde ungemein helfen, danke!

Bei Fragen gern nachhaken.

Schöne Grüße
Dodko (2021-05-10 18:05:35+00:00): Ešte stále je uzávierka?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/674912725
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
mavl (2019-03-09 14:29:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 67959806 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage].
Leo Slager (2019-03-06 13:48:59+00:00): That is not the name of the clothes shop.
Please be carefull with changing the map.
Nmxosm (2019-03-06 15:02:48+00:00): Hallo j1scad,

in deinem Änderunssatz modifizierst du https://osm.org/node/3450913969 , als gäbe es den Getränkemarkt nicht mehr. Trotzdem lässt shop=beverages bestehen. Wie ist das gemeint?

VlG Nmxosm
Nmxosm (2019-03-13 21:16:49+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur.

VlG Nmxosm
mavl (2019-07-21 13:44:11+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 13:44:14+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.