piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Alecs01 (2017-07-06 15:02:44+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap, please do not create random POIs, Porto Ceresio of course is already on the map: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/46462
highflyer74 (2017-07-11 08:46:57+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

Schau' Dir in diesem Fall bitte nocheinmal die Definition der verschiedenen landuse=* Werte an. Sei auch bitte etwas vorsichtiger beim Editieren, und schaue Dir die Dinge vorher genau an, bevor Du sie hochlädst. In diesem Fall https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/290882901 hat ein anderer Mapper bereits einen Fehler von Dir wieder korrigiert.

Auch wichtig: Schreibe aussagekräftige Kommentare zu Deinen Änderungssätzen. "paar veränderungen." oder "ok" reicht definitiv nicht.

Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

Weiteren Lesestoff gibt es hier:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!
keithonearth (2017-08-08 22:40:30+00:00): FYI, this edit added many power=tower nodes with identical locations, pairs with one connected to the powerline, and one not. I've fixed it with this edit: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50956271
Oberaffe (2017-08-08 23:11:45+00:00): Thanks for fixing the towers!
GinaroZ (2017-12-19 19:39:30+00:00): Hi, not sure if you're aware but the correct tag for a "football" pitch is sport=soccer, I've fixed this one: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505591477
Владимир К (2017-07-10 09:10:05+00:00): Why http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505591713 is an ice_rink? I see pitch on Bing imagery
user_5234693 (2017-07-10 11:43:48+00:00): Ok. Maybe you're right. Thank you
Владимир К (2017-07-10 12:05:36+00:00): fixed it. offtop: you can add parking=surface on amenity=parking to mark type of parking 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:parking
user_5234693 (2017-07-10 12:21:17+00:00): Yes, I fixed  http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50174392

Good. I'll indicate the type of parking
Imperator Lrrr (2017-07-06 19:12:08+00:00): cześć,
dałbyś radę poprawić jeszcze relację linii autobusowej 70?
freebeer (2018-05-04 10:07:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 58674462 where the changeset comment is: Clean maps.me private residences spam for GDPR and Notes spring-clean
dgitto (2017-07-08 13:00:55+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM e grazie del tuo primo apprezzato contributo. I monumenti ai Caduti normalmente si taggano con historic=memorial. monument è pensato per oggetti di dimensioni più "monumentali". Ho modificato io. Ciao
dgitto (2017-07-08 13:01:56+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmemorial
highflyer74 (2017-07-11 08:52:50+00:00): Auch hier: dieses Objekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/505601751 heisst bestimmt nicht "Kugelstoßen". Benutze bitte das name=* Tag nur für Eigennamen (siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name und https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Verwende_das_Name-Tag_nicht.2C_um_Dinge_zu_beschreiben).
mavl (2018-11-01 17:02:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64084041 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: fictional data, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2291].
SomeoneElse (2017-07-07 13:27:47+00:00): Thanks for adding these.  Just for info, the latest OS Locator data does include a couple of the new roads:

http://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?zoom=18&lat=53.11182&lon=-1.26038
eggie (2017-07-06 15:39:20+00:00): Oké....Dat ziet er netjes uit. Dit is inderdaad de bedoeling. Nu heb ik wel van die twee parken met dezelfde naam gewoon één park gemaakt en het Leisure=park losgemaakt van de landuse forest en grass. Zo'n deken ligt helemaal los zonder ergens aan te plakken. Dat doen we ook met landuse=residential (woongebieden) Ook loopt de transparant park gewoon over de Stadslaan heen.
Siphoe .. het is een kwestie van volhouden en steeds gewoon vragen... en soms je neus stoten. Ook wij zijn eens begonnen.
Fouten worden niemand kwalijk genomen.... zeker niet in het begin. :)
eggie (2017-07-06 15:42:15+00:00): Nu hetzelfde met dat oostelijke park. Dus helemaal los van alles.
siphoe (2017-07-06 16:01:05+00:00): zal ik nu dan verder gaan met de rest?
eggie (2017-07-06 16:16:03+00:00): Tuurlijk... succes.
marc__marc (2018-01-03 10:52:18+00:00): Hello,
I see a lot of boundary=a shop=a
does this have a meaning ? of it's a mistake ?
RicoElectrico (2017-07-06 17:06:46+00:00): Witaj w OSM i dzięki za samodzielne dodanie sklepu. Dodałeś wcześniej uwagę, zamknąłem ją. https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1055013
W przyszłości proszę o samodzielne zamykanie swoich uwag, jeśli się je poprawiło. Na osm.org w swoim profilu użytkownika można je przejrzeć.
EugenyN (2017-07-07 07:25:01+00:00): если это ресторан, то нужно поменять тег и удалить "ресторан" из имени.
Vas111 (2023-08-25 08:48:33+00:00): The yellow "15 mph" sign is only an advisory speed limit, which should be tagged as maxspeed:advisory=15 mph. The legal speed limit depends on the road that passes through the roundabout
Cybereric (2017-11-15 16:03:44+00:00): Pour information le chantier n'est toujours pas commencé (début 2018)
Valerio_Bozzolan (2022-09-18 09:36:24+00:00): Ciaao! Ho visto questi "spotting point" sulla mappa e ne stiamo discutendo qui:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3303507

Non so se puoi lasciare il tuo parere!
Grazie ciaaao :)
alarobric (2017-07-06 16:52:53+00:00): Welcome to OSM Steven! Thanks for your update to the map.

I'd just like to point out that Wally Creek is not likely the french name for this viewpoint. Also we typically don't enter name:en for features in English speaking areas like this as the name=* is enough on its own.

You've just joined a community of over one million contributors who are creating a free, worldwide map. Welcome!

Happy mapping!
maraf24 (2017-09-25 20:03:33+00:00): A skąd ta nazwa "obwodnica"?
LafarM (2017-09-26 17:12:09+00:00): A nie jest to obwodnica? Jak edytuję w JOSM to mam uwagę, jak nie ma nazwy. Trzeba dodać znacznik noname=yes i jak wiem, że w danym miejscu droga nie ma nazwy ulicy to go dodaję, ale na obwodnicach dodaję nazwę obwodnica. W różnych miastach spotykam się z tym, że drogowskazy wskazują wyjazd na obwodnicę, we Frampolu chyba takich nie ma , ale droga wiodła przez miasto a to jest obwodnica.
Nie twierdzę, że mam rację...
maraf24 (2017-09-26 19:01:27+00:00): Bo to jest w zasadzie opis, lub "nazwa opisowa" jak ja to określam.
Jeśli widnieje na tablicach to bym nie oponował przed umieszczeniem jej w name, tyle że może w formie "Obwodnica"? :)
Jeśli nie ma tablic to raczej loc_name, jednakże tego typu obwodnic jest dużo w kraju i nie przypominam sobie, by powszechnie je opisywano w OSM jako "obwodnica".
marc__marc (2020-01-19 09:49:42+00:00): Hello,
warning about the diff British English <> American !
camp_pitch and camp_site are incompatible on the same object, 
camp_site=camp_pitch is a now depreciated tag.
2 other tags replace it
tourism=camp_pitch represents a part of the area. that seems to be the case for those objects.
tourism=camp_site represents the whole area (campground in American).
Regards,
Marc
TarasD (2020-01-19 14:14:24+00:00): Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Two years is a long time ago and I no longer recall why I added the camp_site=camp_pitch tag. If it's any consolation, the issue is limited to the sites along Meadows Lane whereas the many other ones I added elsewhere (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50088950#map=16/44.1566/-73.9481) do not have this deprecated tag. I will remove the 'camp_site=camp_pitch' tag.

I have a related question for you. Why is a 'camp_pitch' not rendered on OSM's default map? Here's an example created over a month ago (by adkbenb):
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7036426899
It also fails to be rendered by GaiaGPS map (they produce a widely used navigation app for iOS): https://www.gaiagps.com/map/?loc=13.4/-74.0488/44.1442&layer=GaiaTopoRasterFeet
Thunder Forest's Outdoors map also fails to render 'camp_pitch'. 

Only 'camp_site' is consistently rendered by all maps.

Technically speaking, each of these spots is, in OSM language, a camp pitch and not a camp site. In theory, I could change all 'tourism=camp_site' to 'tourism=camp_pitch' (and I generally try to adhere to OSM's definitions). However, if I do that, these redefined 'pitches' will disappear from OSM's map (and maps derived from OSM) thereby making them far less useful to hikers and campers. In other words, compliance with policy will greatly diminish its usefulness to the people who need it most.

I've added signposts, ladders, cables, etc and most are NOT rendered on the default OSM map. That's acceptable because that's a fine level of detail (and only visible on some specialized maps like OpenAndroMaps). However, a camp pitch, like a trail, is vital information for hikers/campers. Until they are rendered by most maps, I would object to changing the tag from camp_site to camp_pitch.

What are your thoughts on this issue?
marc__marc (2020-01-21 13:48:30+00:00): Hello,

I think 'camp_pitch' is not yet rendered for 3 reasons: 1) nobody coded it yet :) 2) there were 3 different schemas for camp_pitch, it's only last year that 2 schemas were depreciated in favor of the 3rd one. 3) there was a pronounced confusion between a camp_pitch<>camp_site.
It's also to help the rendering that I'm working on correcting as many objects as possible. I hope the rendering will come soon. anyway the number of objects with the old schemas is decreasing dramatically and the confusion rate is decreasing strongly.

I understand the problem of the render disappearing if you fix the error. Some contributors use tourism=camp_site fixme=tag for the render, it's a tourism=camp_site
I understand if you do that even if I won't :)
but at least it allows to reduce the number of camp_site=camp_pitch which is already a first improvement.
if no one wants to convert camp_site=camp_pitch then we get stuck with problems 2 and 3, which gives arguments to the rendering team to postpone it until later

tourism=information + information=signpost is display on osm.org

Regards,
Marc
GOwin (2017-08-09 12:47:47+00:00): Hello. Could you say anything more about this project? Is there a web page where we can find more information?

Names of individuals (i.e. homeowners) are not normally added in openstreetmap, for reasons of privacy and security.
c tito young (2021-02-22 04:52:32+00:00): - good points.  The two names will get changed out for privacy reasons.
Valerio_Bozzolan (2022-08-07 09:37:06+00:00): Ciaao! Ho notato alcuni punti di osservazione con "name=Spotting point". Di solito il name si mette solo se quello è il nome proprio del punto. Forse è meglio toglierlo. Però si possono aggiungere altri dettagli volendo:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=viewpoint

Non conoscendo benissimo il posto non saprei meglio cosa aggiungere. Perlustrazione suggerita.
Valerio_Bozzolan (2022-08-07 09:37:21+00:00): Aggiunto anche una nota così si... nota :D
alexwolf1994 (2017-07-06 16:49:25+00:00): Забув змінити опис. Додав будинки і церкву
alexwolf1994 (2017-07-06 16:49:53+00:00): Церква поки не точна, вона тільки будується, на фото з супутника її поки нема
eggie (2017-07-06 19:08:52+00:00): iets te cruciaal.. 
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50089534
Nu zit het park in de knoop met het gras.. Wil je dit zelf oplossen?
eggie (2017-07-06 19:10:22+00:00): De bedoeling is uiteraard goed. Dat vastplakken is zo gebeurd.
eggie (2017-07-06 19:33:54+00:00): Park losgemaakt van wegen en landuse. Lus eruit gehaald.
eggie (2017-07-06 19:58:34+00:00): helaas komt er hier een uitheemse  mapper tussendoor met 50.000 edits op zijn naam  die al je werk te niet deed. Ik heb dat teruggedraaid. http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50092729
eggie (2017-07-06 20:00:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50092729
Hier zie je wat er gebeurd is..
siphoe (2017-07-08 15:55:46+00:00): danku!
wille (2017-07-07 18:46:01+00:00): Oi, Miguel

Só mais um detalhe: no OSM, o melhor é adicionar as siglas na tag "short_name". Assim, devemos evitar adicionar a sigla de um local entre parênteses no campo "nome". Na UnB, quase todos os prédios seguem esse padrão. Isso torna possível que as aplicações possam utilizar a sigla quando não tem espaço na tela pra exibir o nome todo do local.

Os nomes locais ou populares podem ir em "alt_name", como no caso do Beijódromo.

Muito obrigado por suas contribuições! A atualização de pontos de interesse na Asa Sul foi excelente!
Nakaner-repair (2017-07-06 17:00:18+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 49524853, 49763170, 49763309, 50050888.
Nakaner (2017-07-12 13:02:46+00:00): Ich bin von einem Mitarbeiter der Firma Mentz per Mail gefragt worden, warum ich die Änderungssätze revertiert habe. Anstatt auf die E-Mail zu antworten, antworte ich hier, weil ich Diskussionen über meine Reverts in der Öffentlichkeit führen pflege und OpenStreetMap ein offenes Projekt ist (siehe dazu die ersten vier Buchstaben im Namen des Projekts).

Hallo,

die revertierten Änderungssätze sind zwar grenzwertig und je nach Auslegung kein Import, jedoch haben sie mindestens zwei Mängel, die bei einer vorherigen Diskussion aufgefallen wären:

1. Alle Stationen haben dieselbe URL als Website. Das website=*-Tag an Objekten sollte jedoch auf eine Seite spezifisch für das Objekt verlinken. Wenn ich bei einer Lidl-Filiale die Website der Kette haben möchte, dann kann das auch Wikidata liefern.

2. Alle Stationen haben einen systematischen Schreibfehler.

Diese zwei Fehler allein sind für mich nicht Grund genug für einen Revert. Ohne den dritten Punkt hätte ich nur einen Änderungssatzkommentar geschrieben.

Darüber hinaus habe ich die Änderungssätze nämlich revertiert, weil es zum wiederholten Mal die Übernahme von Informationen aus Fremdquellen ist, ohne dass die Nutzungserlaubnis ordentlich dokumentiert ist. Ich hatte euch schon mehrfach auf die Erforderlichkeit der Dokumentation hingewiesen (siehe Hamburg, Bayern und kürzlich in Köln). Nur in einem drei Fälle habe ich an osmkontakt@mentzdv.de geschrieben, da ich euren Mitarbeitern nicht jedes Mal Ärger mit dem Chef bescheren möchte und hoffe, dass ihr untereinander kommuniziert, wenn einer von euch Ärger mit der Community hat. Wenn ich den Eindruck habe, dass ich mir den Mund fusselig rede und mein Geschwätz für die Katz ist, greife ich irgendwann zu deutlicheren Maßnahmen.

Dir steht es selbstverständlich frei, die Diskussion im Forum oder auf einer Mailingliste zu führen, wenn du meinen Revert und/oder meine Forderungen für unangemessen hältst.

Viele Grüße

Michael
Josef K (2017-07-06 18:40:30+00:00): Que ciclovia é esta que segue ao longo da Avenida das Descobertas? Foi inaugurada alguma recentemente? Ou algum trilho? Não me lembro de haver nada ali.
Josef K (2017-07-06 18:53:19+00:00): Reparei agora que essa ciclovia em grande parte se sobrepõe a trilhos já assinalados no mapa.  Caso tenha havido alguma alteração a esses trilhos, deve editá-los antes, em vez de criar uma highway=cycleway paralela -- é duplicação de informação.
Sugiro que apague esses segmentos de ciclovia onde já existe trilho.
Em relação à Av Descobertas, só faz sentido acrescentar uma ciclovia se efectivamente existe lá uma, paralela e segregada da estrada principal, ou um trilho em terra com as mesmas características (highway=path), caso contrário deve apagar tb esse segmento.
rfragoso (2017-07-11 08:39:48+00:00): Estive a actualizar as ciclovias para uma aplicação que precisa de ciclovias na sua aplicação, no entanto os dados que inseri, estão de acordo com o site Lisboa Aberta (http://geodados.cm-lisboa.pt/datasets/11c6e715b94e4495aea09f2317554453_0), já agora poderá eliminar o que fiz, se estiver errado, peço-lhe então que actualize.
Josef K (2017-07-14 01:06:12+00:00): Compreendo, o geodados da CML é uma fonte útil, mas nem sempre está actualizado e tem alguns erros. Na dúvida é sempre de verificar no terreno. Há por aqui muitos ciclistas, portanto o mais provável é que as ciclovias e outras vias interessante para a bicicleta já tenham sido mapeados.
Na zona em torno do Forte do Alto do Duque, a CML indica um dos trilhos que introduziste como pista BTT. Isso classifica-se habitualmente como highway=path + bicycle=yes, não como highway=cycleway.
E de facto lá estão os trilhos introduzidos dessa forma. Acrescentar uma highway=cycleway paralela a eles é redundante e errado.
Se há uma aplicação que precisa de ciclovias, o caminho não é duplicar como ciclovias tudo o que já existe. As bicicletas não andam só nas cycleways, tb podem andar nas footway/path/track, e ainda nas estradas ditas normais. É de informar os programadores que, se precisam de highway=cycleway para a sua aplicação, deve haver um problema a corrigir na aplicação.
Por estas razão apaguei a cycleway que encontrei na zona do Alto do Duque. Mas entretanto apercebi-me que este chgset fez o mesmo por uma vasta área de Monsanto.
Peço por favor, que apagues as highway=cycleway duplicadas e paralelas a vias já existentes. Podes abrir este changeset no JOSM através de Ficheiro->Abrir URL e o endereço desta página [openstreetmap.org/changeset/50089729].
Não desanimes, erros toda a gente comete no início.  Sugiro uma olhada na wiki do OSM para ficar com uma ideia melhor das práticas habituais no OSM, para bicicletas e tudo o mais.
rfragoso (2017-07-14 16:10:50+00:00): Ok. Compreendo o seu ponto de vista, peço o favor, se pode eliminar o que foi introduzido incorrectamente, como sou novo nestas andanças posso eliminar alguma coisa que não deva. obrigado pela sua atenção e as minhas sinceras desculpas
wille (2017-07-07 18:19:51+00:00): oi, Miguel

Tudo bem?

Bom saber que há novos mapeadores em Brasília! Eu reverti algumas das mudanças que você fez nesse changeset no Congresso. Sua edição apagou a informação de altura dos edifícios e deletou alguns caminhos de pedestre.

Cometer erros no início é normal, não se sinta constrangido por isso. Se precisar de algum esclarecimento sobre o OSM, estou à disposição. Temos um grupo no telegram para os colaboradores de Brasília: https://t.me/osmbsb

Abraços,
Wille
Miguel- (2017-07-11 01:20:09+00:00): oi, Wille

Agradeço as correções e a dica do grupo!
Peço desculpa pelos erros, realmente não vi que apaguei essas informações.

um abraço
Markus366 (2017-07-08 10:53:48+00:00): Hallo,
sofern die Landfläche nicht offiziell "Baugebiet" heißt, sollte hier keine name vergeben werden. Die Landfläche ist schon mit landuse construction beschrieben.
Supaplex (2017-07-09 18:46:37+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Commodoortje (2017-07-07 03:27:04+00:00): Naar aanleiding van je  changeset heb ik gekeken of er nog nieuwbouw/verbouw/sloop noodzakelijk was in deze omgeving.
Inmiddels heb ik deze toegevoegd/gewijzigd in OSM.
Als je nog meer ontbrekende/onjuiste panden tegenkomt, kun je een verzoek indienen op het forum om dit te laten actualiseren.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=652908#p652908
.
Hier kun je zien wat ik toegevoegd/gewijzigd heb.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=50098120
voorrangsweg (2017-07-07 18:30:04+00:00): Bedankt Commodoortje! Ik denk dan dat de status van dat appartementencomplex in de BAG Viewer in de afgelopen paar dagen is veranderd, ik heb daar namelijk nog op gekeken, op de wiki pagina staat dat " Panden met de status 'Bouwvergunning verleend' worden niet geïmporteerd. " en daarom had ik het pand niet laten importeren.

Niet dat die status veel zegt, want er zijn ook gebouwen waar ze al ~1 jaar bezig zijn en die nog op 'Bouwvergunning verleend' staan.
Commodoortje (2017-07-07 20:13:26+00:00): klopt.
Stephen214 (2017-07-07 17:51:32+00:00): Please put a comments on your changesets indicating what they're doing, especially large ones like this; it's hard for others to determine from hundreds of edits what is going on.
letihu (2017-07-12 10:42:41+00:00): Erkennt das Tool die entstandene Unterbrechung der Straße nicht?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/238911583/history
ist nicht mehr mit
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506064633/history#map=19/54.16382/10.20735
verbunden gewesen. Ich hab sie hier
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4955363470/history mal wieder verbunden ;-)
simlox (2018-01-02 09:56:21+00:00): Danke!
Imperator Lrrr (2017-07-06 22:56:43+00:00): cześć,
zapoznaj się proszę z użyciem tagu building:levels na wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:building:levels
Ilość poziomów (kondygnacji) powinna być określana łącznie z parterem. Czyli np  budynek Lwowska 42 http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/201893830 powinien mieć wartość building:levels=2 (ma parter i jedno piętro), a nie =1 jak go opisałeś.
Błąd ten dotyczy chyba wszystkich budynków w tym zestawie zmian. 
Popraw je proszę.
pride_dara (2018-12-14 04:16:48+00:00): Hi Tembikai,
 While working on one of Malaysian city Negeri Sembilan, Came across some of your edits where residential road is marked as tertiary. 
Is there any specific reason to mark this as tertiary, If not can I go ahead and make necessary changes?
way 505656000
way 505655991
way 505655992
way 505655999
xmd5a (2017-07-10 07:40:22+00:00): Добрый день. После ваших правок образуется огромное количество ошибок в мультиполигонах. Для таких сложных правок лучше использовать JOSM с проверкой встроенным валидатором. Вот здесь большинство ошибок ваши https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=46.45090&lat=51.71953&zoom=12
Их исправление занимает большое количество времени. Рекомендую еще раз разобраться что такое мультиполигон и как их редактировать.
manoharuss (2017-07-07 10:04:08+00:00): Hi Scodbey,

Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Your interest in contributing to the map is greatly appreciated. But the bus stops you have added seem to be so many here along a single highway. Are these correct?

Thanks,

Manohar
user_6164376 (2017-07-07 13:36:49+00:00): Campbell Avenue inside Springfield is not considered a highway. Springfield has over 1500 bus stops listed. This information comes from the City Utilities transit (the bus provider for Springfield) 2017 geodatabase file.
manoharuss (2017-07-10 05:09:37+00:00): Thanks for replying. Please take a look at  http://learnosm.org/en/coordination/remote-tracing/#highways-howto and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway. On OSM the tagging schema allows us describe any kind of road under highway tag with an appriopriate value. For a freeway, we can use `highway=trunk` for example. 

The information regarding the bus stop from Utilities transit, is it open source? I am afraid, we cannot copy over information if it is not open sourced. Refer to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License for more information.

Thank you.

Manohar
user_6164376 (2017-07-10 15:09:57+00:00): Thank you for the information.
saintam1 (2017-07-06 20:38:09+00:00): Привет, Стоян,

Бих искал да поясня дали този магазин за велосипеди съществува. На уеб сайта им (http://www.bike-house.biz/) е посочен този адрес, както на фейсбук страницата им е предоставена тази снимка от месец май (https://www.facebook.com/BikeHouseBikes/photos/a.512555058828421.1073741835.477582338992360/1332557426828176/?type=3&theater), на която се вижда магазинът.

Но не съм бил на място, заради това бих искал да го потвърдите.