piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frank314 (2014-11-03 08:28:15+00:00): Hey Stalfur, 
I visited this region 2 years ago (I'm dutch) so can't remember all the details. If "track" is more appropriate we should change it as such.
Deanna Earley (2014-11-03 12:54:03+00:00): Test comment
wille (2014-11-03 00:47:39+00:00): Olá, Bruno

Parabéns por sua primeira edição no OpenStreetMap.

Corrigi um pequeno erro que você cometeu. Use o campo ref apenas em rodovias para colocar o código dela, como por exemplo BR-101.

Qualquer dúvida sobre o OSM, consulte http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt-br:Map_Features
ou nosso Fórum: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=74
Thomas8122 (2014-11-03 07:19:33+00:00): Radebeul, Hauptstraße (war schon spät ;)
emacsen (2014-11-03 00:59:48+00:00): I see that you're reclassifying roads, such as way 310882640. Is there a reason that
 you're doing this? That road is clearly not an unclassified road as per the wiki definition:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dunclassified

Can you please explain your reason for reclassifying the roads?
naoliv (2014-11-04 11:27:16+00:00): Flávio, porque você alterou a rua dessa forma?
Flavio Faleiros (2014-11-04 11:52:33+00:00): bom dia

Moro nessa rua e esse é o nome correto dela!

Abraço
naoliv (2014-11-04 11:58:17+00:00): Não digo o nome, mas o formato dela.
Você deixou ela reta mas a imagem do Bing mostra ela com algumas curvas.
naoliv (2014-11-04 11:58:57+00:00): Estou falando da Rua Vereador Paulo Paupitz
Flavio Faleiros (2014-11-04 12:05:07+00:00): sim, devo ter feito isso por engano, minha intenção era só mudar o nome da rua da minha casa
naoliv (2014-11-04 12:40:19+00:00): Certo. Vou arrumar essa rua que ficou reta então.
Endres Pelka (2015-01-18 20:43:06+00:00): Why did you remove name (original bulgarian name=Златни Пясъци) from node 533036337 while adding the Russian name? I'm reverting this.
bullethimself (2015-01-22 10:13:26+00:00): Maybe I removed the Bulgarian name by mistake. Thank you paid attention to it and fix it. I will be more attentive.
avena701 (2023-05-28 12:05:07+00:00): Someone deleted the name in castellano. Should it be readded as name:es ?
Are all house numbers really still missing?
Jason Harrison (2017-04-03 03:07:47+00:00): Hi Matt!

I saw the roundabout you drew/modified here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/39.78745/-75.05067

It looks overly complex compared to https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/39.83639/-74.92779

What are your thoughts on simplifying it?  

Jason
rickmastfan67 (2014-11-03 11:25:37+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits in the
rickmastfan67 (2014-11-03 11:28:31+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your edits in the Boise, ID area.

However, I'm curious as to why you also added some items along the Equator in the middle of the ocean? Was that in error, and if so, can I be of assistance in reverting those particular edits?
tmiddleton92 (2014-11-03 15:58:40+00:00): Honestly I'm completely at a loss as to how that could have happened. It's my first time using the software. Please - be my guest!
rickmastfan67 (2014-11-04 02:45:30+00:00): Alright, I have done this in Changeset 26540556.  Again, welcome to OSM, and if you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask!
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/26540556
Supaplex (2014-11-03 07:53:46+00:00): 命名方面，可以用
old_name=大里高中
offical_name=國立中興大學附屬高級中學
name=興大附中
KnMoon (2014-11-04 00:29:09+00:00): 編輯時的確有煩惱名字過長的問題，
原來有old_name和offical_name的寫法，受教了。
因為台中市同時有「國立大里高中」「市（縣）立大里高中」兩所學校，所以old_name會加註國立。
Littlebtc (2014-11-03 08:07:19+00:00): Ouch, I use low-res Mapbox Sattelite to draw it instead of Bing.
Supaplex (2014-11-03 09:39:39+00:00): That's rather better than using image cover by cloud in Bing.
Nakaner (2015-05-25 09:01:23+00:00): Nur als Hinweis: railway=station/halt für Bahnhof/Haltepunkt wird auf einen Node getaggt. Bahnhofsgebäude bekommen building=train_station. Mit einer Fläche impliziert man nämlich eine Ausdehnung. Die Ausdehnung eines Bahnhofs ist jedoch erheblich größer als die eines Bahnhofsgebäudes. Ich habe es korrigiert.
eBin (2014-11-03 12:37:52+00:00): Polecam tego Pana.
flohoff (2014-11-03 20:19:06+00:00): Hi,
wenn ich den changeset richtig interpretiere hast du ein Gebäude gelöscht. Existiert das nicht mehr? Steht leider nichts im Kommentar des changesets.
PT-53 (2019-10-21 08:31:34+00:00): Hallo Arne,
auch hier wieder:
Du verschiebst Straßen anhand Luftbilder ohne zuvor den Luftbild-Versatz zu berichtigen.
So ist das eine Verschlimmbesserung.
Schade
Derick Rethans (2014-11-03 10:26:34+00:00): Hi,

I saw you added a node right in the middle of Marylebone Road - that's most certainly not where your office is. Do you have a physical office that people can visit? If so, that's where you should put the node, preferably with the full address. If you do not have a physical office, the data does not belong in OpenStreetMap.

cheers,
Derick
naoliv (2014-11-03 12:42:20+00:00): Yuri, você apagou vários objetos válidos nesta sua edição.
Tem algum motivo para isso?
emacsen (2014-11-03 16:52:00+00:00): What is the source for these changes?
KindredCoda (2014-11-03 21:50:52+00:00): Bing aerial.
emacsen (2014-11-03 21:57:32+00:00): Can you please create meaningful changeset comments and or set the source tag on the changeset as source=bing?

That'll make it a lot easier for people to see why you're making these changes.
KindredCoda (2014-11-03 22:48:58+00:00): I'll do both from now on.
emacsen (2014-11-03 22:50:00+00:00): Much thanks!
vichada (2014-11-03 14:43:07+00:00): Not sure this really classifies as an "isolated_dwelling"?
lezurdis (2014-11-05 11:59:29+00:00): Olá,
Seja bem-vindo no OSM, queria dizer-te que corrigi o nome de rua porque não se usa tudo em letra maiúscula nos nomes.
flohoff (2014-11-03 20:16:17+00:00): Halb Europa im Changeset und dann kein Kommentar dafür - Damit tauchst du bei vielen Beobachtern auf ;)
lezurdis (2014-11-05 12:02:38+00:00): Corrigi o nome com letra minúscula e não é preciso redesenhar a estrada para colocar o nome, senão fiquemos com troços de rua duplicados (foi o caso aqui).
GerdP (2015-11-02 14:34:08+00:00): please review :
why did you change class=A3.0 to highway=A3.0 for the boundary relation
of Deutschland?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4108738
rza31 (2015-11-03 09:59:48+00:00): I don't active change boundary relations. Feel free to discuss in the forum or to review. The History of the relation isn't available for me.
GerdP (2015-11-03 10:02:18+00:00): vielleicht besser in Deutsch:
wenn es keine Absicht war, dann ändere ich es einfach zurück. OK?
rza31 (2015-11-03 10:04:23+00:00): Ok.
GerdP (2015-11-03 10:15:03+00:00): oh, sorry, I sehe gerade, dass es gar keine boundary relation ist, sondern 
type=tmc:area
Da muss ich mich selber erst mal schlau lesen.
Gehrke (2015-11-04 08:45:33+00:00): Hab die Änderung, welche ja schon ziemlich alt ist, wieder auf den Originalzustand gesetzt. "highway" ergibt keinen Sinn und war wohl ein Versehen.
Zeigt aber auch, wie unwichtig diese Relation bzw. das tag zu sein scheint.
GerdP (2015-11-04 08:56:41+00:00): @Gehrke
okay, danke, bei mir ist das nur aufgeschlagen, weil ich z.Z. alle seltsamen highway tags überprüfe.
Ich vermute mal, das hier das gleiche passiert ist:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4163660
Gehrke (2015-11-04 09:03:09+00:00): Habe das auch geändert
GerdP (2015-11-04 09:14:25+00:00): Danke. Ich denke, das Problem ist JOSM.
Der schlägt definitiv vor, das tag class=* nach highway=* zu ändern.
Vielleicht kannst Du mal die Entwickler kontaktieren ?
Sanderd17 (2014-11-03 13:53:37+00:00): Discussion test
Hjart (2015-02-26 07:22:25+00:00): Hvad er det her?
species (2014-11-07 08:31:24+00:00): würde hier nicht "amenity=clinic" besser passen?
a_uller (2014-11-07 08:55:29+00:00): Lt. Homepage sind die nur 2 Stunden am Tag offen, und dazu noch ein paar Spezialambulanzen. Leider weiß ich nicht, wieviele Ärzte dann da sind, glaube aber nicht dass es als clinic durchgeht (das wäre sowas wie eine Krankenhaus-Ambulanz, ist in Ö halt eigentlich immer mit einem Krankenhaus verbunden)
Durko_freemap (2014-11-28 13:45:14+00:00): Zdravim Marek, na otagovanie tych ciar odporucam pouzit napr. tag highway=track, Dakujem.
zors1843 (2014-11-04 12:33:56+00:00): If access for motorcar is not forbidden, you could use the smoothness tag : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-05 17:40:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3164471872/history has access:vehicle that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
Would using vehicle access tag (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:vehicle ) be fitting at least equally well?
naoliv (2014-11-03 17:11:53+00:00): Vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula ou curso sobre edição de mapas no OSM?
seattlefyi (2014-11-05 22:44:36+00:00): Thanks for making this correction! Please note that OSM's policy is to avoid using third party sources which we don't have explicit permission to use. Was in the area, so verified it.
Durko_freemap (2014-11-28 13:38:54+00:00): Zdravim Marek, na tagovanie budovy sa pouziva tag: building=yes + zrejme v tomto pripade source=bing a nie area, opravte si to prosim. Vdaka.
aseerel4c26 (2015-01-17 00:45:23+00:00): habe ich bereinigt.
naoliv (2014-11-03 17:12:11+00:00): Vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula ou curso sobre edição de mapas no OSM?
naoliv (2014-11-03 17:12:00+00:00): Vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula ou curso sobre edição de mapas no OSM?
naoliv (2014-11-03 17:13:44+00:00): Vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula ou curso sobre edição de mapas no OSM?
trigpoint (2014-11-03 17:44:00+00:00): In what way is the path no longer accessible?

If it is private it should be tagged as such, not removed.

It should only be removed it it physically no longer exists.
GavSt (2014-11-03 19:13:46+00:00): They are destroyed by forestry works
naoliv (2014-11-03 17:33:14+00:00): Vocês estão tendo algum tipo de aula ou curso sobre edição de mapas no OSM?
Mariano Lorenzoni (2014-11-03 19:33:57+00:00): Sim, com o clube de Cartografia da Escola "Jacaraípe".
naoliv (2014-11-03 19:43:24+00:00): E quem está ensinando vocês?
blackadder (2014-11-14 09:49:05+00:00): Have reverted this changeset as the previously added not:name should be Cooks Avenue as that is what the OS believes it is.
flohoff (2014-11-03 20:12:30+00:00): Was hast du denn hier editiert? Ist ja ein riesiger Bereich nur leider hast du kein changset Kommentar hinterlassen?!
Lokführer32 (2014-11-03 20:57:22+00:00): Ich habe in zwei Ortschaften mehrere Hausadressen ergänzt/geändert und habe wohl vergessen zwischenzeitlich zu speichern, sodass hier jetzt leider ein riesiger Bereich zustande gekommen ist. Das war nicht meine Absicht!
Endres Pelka (2014-11-05 12:31:21+00:00): Warum hast du einen Multipolygon vom landuse=forest ins building=yes gewechselt? Ich habe diesen Changeset revertiert.
blattlaus (2014-11-05 12:51:48+00:00): Muss irgendwie aus Versehen passiert sein, als ich andere Änderungen gemacht habe. Sorry
EugenyN (2016-04-22 15:58:41+00:00): а откуда такое название - Рамоньская дача ?
keder (2016-04-22 17:45:20+00:00): Не могу вспомнить и найти источник, думаю надо удалить
EugenyN (2016-04-22 17:51:29+00:00): да. подозрительное название. может быть народное... и заметку закрыть можно:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/471416
EugenyN (2015-01-16 21:52:03+00:00): а зачем это нужно ?
keder (2015-01-17 15:01:36+00:00): Точка с ролью label, может когда мапник научат этому и он будет название писать только в этой точке, а не на каждом кусочке.
EugenyN (2015-01-17 16:13:49+00:00): понятно.  кстати, думаю с них можно убрать лишние теги вроде wood и locality.
ChillyDL (2021-12-19 21:42:10+00:00): Um was für ein Megalithbauwerk handelt es sich denn hier? Eine Quellenangabe wäre noch hervorragend. Im Archäologieatlas und Topo-Karten ist hier nichts verzeichnet.
Minh Nguyen (2014-11-03 21:45:36+00:00): By the way, you can often find names of creeks and lakes on the USGS Topographic Maps layer in either Potlatch or iD. (Though years out of date, it’s also really handy and accurate for county/township/city limits.)
Tigre-Bleu (2014-11-10 07:59:10+00:00): Salut,
Comment tu as fait pour le rond-point d'intermarché? Trace GPS?
Ce n'est pas encore dans Bing ni dans le cadastre.
En tout cas je suis content de voir que quelqu'un d'autre s'occupe un peu d'Uzerche et de Vigeois. Je me sentais un peu seul :)
Antoine
StephaneP (2014-11-10 08:14:02+00:00): Salut !
Oui, je suis passé là cet été et j'avais fait une trace, je l'ai indiqué dans les sources du changeset. Par contre, je viens de me rendre compte que je ne l'ai pas envoyée sur le serveur osm. Je vais le faire. Il faudrait d'autres traces pour améliorer la précision.
J'ai encore des photos à utiliser pour mapper des détails dans Uzerche, mais ensuite je vais être obligé de te laisser pour suivre mes autres traces gps, désolé. C'est certain qu'en Corrèze, il y a encore beaucoup de travail. Dès que je viens dans la région, principalement sur le plateau des milles vaches, Osmtracker bosse beaucoup :-)

Au passage, est-ce que tu pourrais ne pas coller les landuse aux axes des routes ? Ca complique sérieusement l'édition, et géométriquement ce n'est pas correct. Exemple, une forêt ne va pas jusqu'au centre de la route.

A+
Klumbumbus (2014-11-04 10:19:39+00:00): testting.

this feature
umitarabul (2014-11-03 21:44:42+00:00): Road nodes corrected
chillly (2014-11-05 19:16:08+00:00): You seem to be adding place=farm to farms that already have names. I wonder why?
yuryleb (2015-04-04 10:18:06+00:00): Интересно, а зачем, собственно, вы заменили wikipedia:ru => wikipedia=ru: ? Ведь при более общей записи ключа wikipedia:ru (по аналогии с name:ru и прочими) можно задать несколько разных ссылок на Википедию для разных языковых разделов.
parukhin (2015-04-04 10:51:23+00:00): В основном не нужно задавать ссылки на несколько разделов, это обеспечивают кросс-ссылки в самой википедии.
Почитайте http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:wikipedia?uselang=ru
yuryleb (2015-04-04 16:00:28+00:00): Ну да, но я ведь спрашивал, зачем менять все равно работающий вариант ссылки у всего подряд без изменения других данных? Ладно это делать попутно с другими изменениями, но делать изменения только ради изменений, даже и из благих побуждений следования неким "стандартам", по-моему, не стоит - благие намерения известно куда обычно приводят ;)
parukhin (2015-04-04 19:46:05+00:00): Где вы это спрашивали? :)
Иногда я меняю вид деятельности и вместо нанесения POI читаю http://stat.latlon.org/ru/ и потом правлю разные аномалии (на мой взгляд).
Странно, когда, например, у объекта есть теги wikipedia:en=* и wikipedia:ru=*, но нет wikipedia=*.
Ну а там где wikipedia:ru => wikipedia=ru: -- перенос из "второстепенного" тега в "основной".
OdysseyResorts (2014-11-03 22:19:53+00:00): Updated information about Caribou Highlands Lodge
emacsen (2014-11-03 22:20:22+00:00): Unless the name of every single of these buildings that have the name "Caribou Highlands Lodge Poplar Ridge Homes" on them, then this changeset is too spammy and will be reverted.

Please fix.
OdysseyResorts (2014-11-03 22:26:53+00:00): I can definitely change these. What would you recommend for the naming of the buildings? There are several different styles of buildings at this resort. 9 of them are Poplar Ridge Homes, 5 are town homes, 2 are executive lodges, 3 are condo buildings and 1 is a lodge. They are all part of one resort property, Caribou Highlands Lodge.
emacsen (2014-11-03 22:30:59+00:00): If each building has a name, like the "Caribu Lodge"- then go ahead and change the name to that. What are you trying to indicate- that these are lodges available as part of the resort?
OdysseyResorts (2014-11-03 22:37:45+00:00): Yes. The entire resort property called Caribou Highlands Lodge is made up of 20 buildings. We refer to these buildings as condos, lodge, town homes, and poplar ridge homes. My naming was an attempt to show they are part of the same property, but designate their differences. So I could get rid of the "caribou highlands lodge" portion, but I think that would be less helpful. It is one business.
emacsen (2014-11-03 22:48:33+00:00): I don't know if this is really your first OSM edit (it's your first one on this account). If so- this is a pretty amazing job. To indicate buildings are part of the same property, you could use something called a relation- which I can show you how to create (it's just a bit complex).

Otherwise, I'd just use a single node to represent the resort.

The problem with having it on every building is twofold. First, unless they each are named that, then it's not accurate. You could name each one what you call it internally, eg "Building 12" if there's a sign on it saying so.

The second and more glaring problem is that most of the time, the reason someone puts a name on an object is so that it's rendered with the name, so right now we have a bunch of buildings with the name of the resort, which reads too much like spam. Let me know, and I can also help fix it if you need help.
EdLoach (2014-11-04 10:02:51+00:00): I don't know whether this is relevant, but there is an area near me that has holiday homes for rent where the whole area has been mapped as landuse=commercial (for lack of a suitable tourism tag) and the individual buildings with their numbers. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/129105350#map=16/51.8226/1.0647
AndrewBuck (2014-11-04 13:37:30+00:00): The best thing to do would be to put the name of the resort in the 'operator' tag for the buildings.  I don't think the iD editor displays a box for that field by default, you will have to click the 'All tags' button and then add a new one with a key of 'operator' and for the value put in the resort name.
Skippern (2014-11-10 18:23:42+00:00): Favor nao coloque "Restaurante" como nome, deixa vazia ou coloque nome na placa.
Skippern (2014-11-10 18:24:20+00:00): Favor nao coloque "Posto" como nome, nem bandeira do posto gasolina. Se não conheço nome do posto deixa vazia, o bandeira pode se colocado no etiquete "brand"
cadsauxk (2014-11-07 20:40:03+00:00): Por favor, sempre forneça razões ou explicações para as suas edições. 
Obrigado
Hair By Jacki (2014-11-04 04:27:45+00:00):  payment:bitcoin=yes
trial (2019-06-17 17:30:57+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3166118793
What to you mean?
brand=The Pastry Shop?
name=The Pastry Shop?
gormo (2014-11-04 08:09:59+00:00): Hi there, some of your edits seem to be located in the middle of the atlantic ocean. 
Was that intentional?
gormo (2014-11-04 08:08:31+00:00): Hi There, some of your edits seem to be located at the 0,0-Point in the Atlantic. Please look into that.
aceman444 (2014-12-14 13:04:30+00:00): Dobry den v tejto sade zmien ste vytvorili bod 3166159765, ktory spojil dialnicu D2 s cestou 503010 (maju teraz spolocny bod). Davajte na to pozor, lebo to sa potom javi, ze je tam krizovatka a moze sa odbocit z jednej cesty na druhu. Opticky to nie je vidiet (na mape), ale navigacie s tym potom pocitaju. Podla bingu to vsak nie je pravda, je to normalny most. Opravil som.
Noro Hibu (2014-11-04 09:00:01+00:00): clarify population date
Noro Hibu (2014-11-04 09:00:45+00:00): clarify population date
Supaplex (2014-11-04 14:27:56+00:00): motorway一般是用來畫高速公路用，山間小徑應該不適用吧?
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-02 08:24:32+00:00): Östlich des Fuldaer Hauses ist kein Zeltplatz. Hast du eventuell den Jugendzeltplatz 200 m westlich gemeint? Der wird vom Fuldaer Haus aus betrieben. Dann kann Node 3166232203 weg, ich will ihn aber nicht ohne Rücksprache löschen.
HoloDuke (2017-05-08 21:35:22+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Habe die Node mit dem Zeltplatz östlich vereint.
GerdP (2015-10-29 11:15:37+00:00): please review:
way 311081520, 311081520
are tagged highway=rope
This tag is only used here, the note describes a steep way.
So I guess it is a highway=path
and needs a sac_scale=* tag,
see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sac_scale
adaviel (2015-10-29 20:18:25+00:00): It's a path, but it's more-or-less vertical with a fixed rope which you use to ascend.
Since there's a tag for "stairs", I thought "rope" would be appropriate.
But please change it as you think best.
GerdP (2015-10-29 20:24:03+00:00): okay, I'll change it to path and
sac_scale=demanding_mountain_hiking
later
GerdP (2015-10-29 21:55:39+00:00): done, please check
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34960661
Hjart (2014-11-05 10:14:14+00:00): Kan der køre skovmaskiner på disse veje? Du har lavet et lille utagget liniestykke. Havde du nogen planer med den?
jnjlc (2014-11-05 12:46:28+00:00): Ja, men kan uden problemer passere med maskiner op til traktorstørrelse.
Det lille umærkede vejstykke er nu slettet, det var en fejl jeg havde overset.
Hjart (2014-11-05 18:32:42+00:00): Udmærket. Når der er tale om deciderede skovveje (i modsætning til stier) anbefales det at tagge/mærke dem highway=track. Hvis der ikke er adgang for offentlig motoriseret trafik kan de desuden tagges/mærkes motorvehicle=private eller forestry.
Iøvrigt, velkommen til OSM. Håber du har haft fornøjelse med de første forsøg.
jnjlc (2014-11-05 18:42:04+00:00): Ah, men det er netop der det går galt :-) det er en privat skov hvor kun beboere, som jeg, må benytte motorkøretøjer.
Så jeg mener det vil være misvisende at klassificere det som regulære veje.
Men hvis du vurderer at det er mere korrekt ift. OSM så omklassificerer jeg dem gerne.
Hjart (2014-11-05 19:42:08+00:00): highway=unclassified/residential/tertiary/secondary etc betegner regulære offentlige bilveje (uanset om de er asfalterede eller ej).
highway=track betegner mark- og skovveje der ikke er beregnet til regulær offentlig motoriseret trafik.
Som cyklist er det ofte rart at kunne se på kortet hvilke skovveje der kan køres på med biler, da de ofte vil være af lidt bedre kvalitet end en generel skovsti. Derfor anbefaler jeg at tagge dem highway=track
maraf24 (2018-02-08 09:49:48+00:00): Nie ma takiej ulicy we Wrocławiu.
bibinato (2014-11-04 10:19:15+00:00): Villa des Hauts de Belleville est le nom de la VOIE, pas de la résidence. ON l'appelle Résidence des Hauts de Belleville
luiswoo (2014-11-04 14:30:46+00:00): Хм, и что это за "хвост" идёт до Ереванской?
user_468980 (2014-11-08 07:23:26+00:00): Убрал.
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-05 09:15:31+00:00): Dlaczego zmieniłeś nazwę miejscowości Mięćmierz na Męćmierz? https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mi%C4%99%C4%87mierz
Takie zabawy nie są mile widziane.
RMAS (2014-11-05 11:33:27+00:00): Prawidłowa nazwa miejscowości to Męćmierz: http://www.kazimierzdolny.pl/punkty_widokowe/124/.
Taka nazwa figuruje na tablicy drogowej przed nazwą miejscowości. Proszę o e-mail, to podeślę zdjęcie.
Zbigniew_Cz (2014-11-05 11:39:04+00:00): Przykro mi, ale tablice przydrożne nie są dla mnie wiarygodnym źródłem informacji. Już wiele razy spotkałem się, że informacja na takowej tablicy była błędna i prawdopodobnie tak jest w tym przypadku. We wszelkich materiałach urzędowych (np. TERYT) jest Mięćmierz.
tuxayo (2015-10-24 17:36:27+00:00): This was not a trial, this was the on the real map
Damien Clauzel (2014-11-04 12:10:24+00:00): Oups, le commentaire de la précédente édition a été repris. Il faut bien sûr comprendre que c’est un ajout, et que cette administration ne concerne en rien les animaux ;)
CloCkWeRX (2014-11-05 10:17:51+00:00): Neat, moar buildings!

How far are you keen to trace? I'd be happy to help do rural housing or detail on a place like Lyndoch, making it easy for you to add in shops/landmarks/etc.
Josh_G (2014-11-05 10:44:32+00:00): That'd be great - just trying to get as many of the rural landmarks/buildings traced as possible in the area. Hike all around here so its all useful data.
Suidakra (2014-11-04 23:10:01+00:00): Metzgerei und Bäckerei
mikecc (2016-10-03 16:56:59+00:00): siehe http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/42610220
und https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/733445
Blöde Situation. Jedoch in Karten ist der Abschnitt Salzach genannt und dort gibt es den Salzachweg.
SomeoneElse (2014-11-04 14:24:29+00:00): Did "motorcycle=private" perhaps get added to http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/118550554 by mistake?  I'm not sure that it makes a lot of sense as it stands.
numide (2014-11-04 22:44:51+00:00): travail de fou, il n'y a que toi et moi  à cartographier en Algérie....
Suidakra (2014-11-04 23:09:16+00:00): Sparkasse eingefügt