piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse (2018-11-07 21:07:07+00:00): Hello Zyzio1440,
All of your changesets seem to have the comment "poprawki" (amendments).  Can you please use more meaningful changeset comments that would help other mappers?
Best Regards,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2018-11-07 21:07:34+00:00): Witaj Zyzio1440,
Wszystkie twoje zestawy zmian wydają się mieć komentarz "poprawki".  Czy możesz użyć bardziej znaczących komentarzy do zestawów zmian, które mogłyby pomóc innym twórcom map?
Z poważaniem,
Andy
azakh-world (2018-11-21 23:05:29+00:00): Hello.
Øresund station belongs to subway route. Why to delete "station=subway" tag from it?
mikkolukas (2018-11-22 03:59:23+00:00): Because it is not the way to tag a subway station. If you want the station node to be a subway it shound be tagged as subway=yes instead.
mikkolukas (2018-11-22 03:59:47+00:00): Read more here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Stations_.2F_Stops
mikkolukas (2018-11-22 04:05:32+00:00): I have corrected it here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64761286
azakh-world (2018-11-22 09:43:09+00:00): station=subway tag does not contradict OpenRailwayMap scheme, it is approved and widely used:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:station%3Dsubway
Though subway=yes should suffice for my purposes in this particular case.
mikkolukas (2018-11-22 22:53:49+00:00): The dokumentation at the osm wiki outside the openrailwaymap tagging overview is wildly inconsistent and in some places plainly wrong.

Example:
The link you provided say to tag the station directly ON the railway track - which is just plainly wrong.
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-04-17 18:49:47+00:00): Can you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3647393 ?
user_5173844 (2018-11-06 11:49:41+00:00): Hi, the bottom left roundabout junctions are still shown as under construction, is that an omission or are these junctions still blocked?
robw (2018-11-06 13:21:38+00:00): Fixed.
jc86035 (2018-11-06 12:44:54+00:00): Are you sure about this? To me it seems more appropriate to use motorway_link on both ways, although I'm not entirely sure if that would be correct.
jc86035 (2018-11-06 12:45:35+00:00): In particular, both ways are one-way and thus only accessible from the down ramp.
🗺🗺🗺 (2018-11-06 12:50:21+00:00): In the wiki for Highway link #Special considerations for motorways, "In some countries (such as the United Kingdom...), motorway has a legal implication: certain classes of vehicles ... and drivers ... cannot use motorways. The same restrictions apply to their motorway_links. So only the motorway_link tag should be used on connecting roads that have these restrictions." Such legal implications also exist in Hong Kong (known as "Highway"). Only those sections should be tagged with "motorway_link".
jc86035 (2018-11-06 12:53:09+00:00): Okay. Is the sign that indicates the end of the highway area at that junction point?
🗺🗺🗺 (2018-11-06 12:55:54+00:00): It stood at the point where the road diverges, not at the point where it meets with Tai Hong St.
jc86035 (2018-11-06 12:56:11+00:00): It seems I took a photo of this four years ago (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/ut3dcq1_TKgK3eazQz62MA). The sign appears to be just before the junction.
🗺🗺🗺 (2018-11-06 12:57:47+00:00): The sign stood before the left turn lane diverges.
ztztztz (2019-11-05 13:14:42+00:00): 孤独博物馆是什么？
Moldovan_Merkator (2018-11-06 20:45:22+00:00): Maturi0n, these borders are on-the-ground, I was born in Criuleni, and I know what territory are controlled by Moldovan government, ad what by Tiraspol separatists, if you don't know the real statute of these settlement (Roghi) - don't make your changes by you desire.
Maturi0n (2018-11-07 13:50:37+00:00): Ok, I don't know first-hand who controls Roghi, but there are numerous hint that it's in fact the PMR.

This video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5u1dLc8mtc) for example shows numerous signs in Roghi where PMR symbols are clearly visible (for example at minute 7:00). The video is from Transnistrian state TV, but definitely not fake, as buildings shown in the video can be geolocated. Also, the Moldovan Yellow pages (yp.md) show zero entries for Roghi, while the Transnistrian equivalent to it (pmr.md) shows numerous entries for it.
I've found several other videos where PMR symbols can be seen within Roghi, but I haven't seen any proof of Moldovan authorities controlling it. Can you show me any proof that Roghi is controlled by regular Moldovan authorities?

I also want to make clear that my goal here is not politically motivated. I want OSM to objectively reflect the on-the-ground situation as exactly as possible. For example, I removed Copanca from Transnistria on OSM, since it is not controlled by it. I also re-added borders between Cocieri and Dubossary, since Cocieri was incorrectly marked as being controlled by the PMR. I did not revert your changeset to make a political statement, but because I have very serious doubts that Roghi is under control of Moldova.
Moldovan_Merkator (2018-11-07 17:55:41+00:00): Hello, well, ok look on this video - (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2KJV4jnuQgs) Looking on cadastral data you will see that territories that you claimed are under PMR law, are registered in Moldovan Cadastral Department (Cadastru) : (https://geoportal.md/en/default/map#lat=244334.458932&lon=260109.244227&zoom=6) Yes of course, autoclaimed leaders from PMR claim these territories being theirs, but, in real they want all settlements on the left bank of Dniester.
atcomapper (2018-11-06 14:20:14+00:00): Undlad venligst at slette adresser
eggie (2018-11-06 09:06:38+00:00): Dag Beaker..  In een note= kun je evt kwijt dat iets gesloten is. 
Dus niet name=  gebruiken om aan te duiden dat iets gesloten is. 
Wanneer Foodlovers niet meer bestaat haal je gewoon heel de naam weg en ook amenity=restaurant. 
MVG,
Eggie
mavl (2019-02-22 16:54:30+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Russ McD (2018-11-29 06:59:09+00:00): Mr ak Ram - you have chosen to extend way 30477604, which is correctly tagged and has a name, along a farm track and into a garden nursery that sells trees. I know, I live here.
There is no problem in creating a track here, but you should NOT have just extended the residential road.  You can clearly see its unsurfaced, and you should have drawn this as a new way, tagged as a track.
Please stop editing and go back for retraining.
Russ McD (2018-11-29 06:59:20+00:00): Its fixed now.
ak_ram (2018-11-29 08:02:43+00:00): Hello RussMcD

Let me explain
The way was existing sine 2009 and is already tagged as "Residential" by Thailand local mapper.
Later there were multiple mappers again from Thailand Chang Mai who worked on the same segment, yet it was retained as "Residential Road".  Hence I did not change the classification

Thanks for fixing this
ak_ram.
Russ McD (2018-11-30 01:10:34+00:00): You clearly do not understand my comment.  The EXISTING way was correct as residential.  It stopped where the asphalt finished.
You then EXTENDED the road along a farm track.  You should have CREATED a NEW segment with different tags.  Clearly your retraining is not working and I feel its time for you to resign from the team.
Russ.
eggie (2018-11-06 09:20:07+00:00): Hier https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64222436#map=19/52.14790/5.06344
heb ik een klein stukje gedaan als voorbeeld. Wellicht als je zou verdiepen in de nieuwe plugin wordt het simpeler. Moet ik zelf ook nog doen.
eggie (2018-11-06 09:23:00+00:00): Mijn edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64223323
Linksonder begonnen... maar dat is een heidens karwei voor regendagen of een meter sneeuw buiten.
GOwin (2018-12-24 12:50:40+00:00): Covered two discontinous areas, which ideally could've been split to two. Edits to the west are okay, but edits to the east removed the valid driveway tag, and changed the previously better geometry. The editor misinterpreted the angle of features in the imagery and the perceived space between features.

Checking other imagery could've avoided this. This is typical for beginners and easily addressable with proper on-boarding.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64222985
kayle (2018-11-06 09:30:48+00:00): arrr... prave som tam dorobil domy a zarovnal cesty :)
kayle (2018-11-06 10:08:58+00:00): ehem, dovolil som si tie budovy zmazat, nakolko tie kapor2 vyzeraju byt presnejsie
Andreeeee (2018-11-06 11:04:16+00:00): hehe.... jasne, v pohode :-)
osmviborg (2018-11-06 09:50:39+00:00): Angiv venligst kun det officielle vejnavn. 'Øhavsstien' er angivet på rute- relationen.
Niels Beck (2018-11-06 12:17:09+00:00): OK!
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:37+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
Andrea Musuruane (2018-11-11 19:08:45+00:00): Ciao Il tag leisure=swimming_pool deve essere applicato sul perimetro della piscina: 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dswimming_pool Se ci sono più piscine, come in questo caso, bisogna disegnarne una per ogni vasca e applicarci il tag. Per segnare tutta l'area invece si usa leisure=sports_centre + sport=swimming. Ciao, Andrea
mavl (2019-02-22 16:54:34+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:40+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-02-22 16:54:38+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
grelus (2018-12-08 19:47:00+00:00): why you are lifting that roads to UCL? they are unpaved forest tracks
nemca (2019-01-03 11:41:42+00:00): The change was done based on the info from the local delivery driver. I will doubleck that.
Wulf4096 (2018-11-07 00:46:47+00:00): Hi hamdroid,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/641516237 ;-)
Wulf4096 (2018-11-07 00:48:03+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1583450
Harel M (2020-08-27 06:55:52+00:00): Hi,
It seems that there are a few issues with this edit which I can't figure out how to correct.
The wikipedia tag is not pointing to any wikipedia article, did you mean סביון (ישוב)?
Also there's a problem with the name of the node - the name is סביון גני יהודה while the area around it and the municipal relation are still named סביון.
did you mean to change only the municipal area and not the name of the settlement?
Please help me correct this as I'm not familiar with the area...
Thanks ahead!
Ram Ezrah (2020-08-27 07:34:28+00:00): Hi Harel
I've corrected the Wiki tag. Ganei Yehuda was merged with Savyon (in 2003) and the new municipality is called "Savyon Ganei Yehuda.
Harel M (2020-08-27 08:00:29+00:00): Thanks for the info and the quick fix! a few comments though:
The area is still called סביון see here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93181412
there is still an area and a place named גני יהודה.
if the settlements were merged then the area should be merged as well and the label for גני יהודה should be removed.
if the only change was in the municipal regional council (מועצה מקומית) then there's no reason to change the label of סביון as you did.
please also note that you did not change the name in English to match the one in Hebrew.
If this is too complicated for you to fix please let me know and I'll help out. I mainly need to know if the change was in the settlement area or the regional municipal council.
Thanks for donating you knowledge to OSM! :-)
Ram Ezrah (2020-08-27 08:34:36+00:00): I'll try to make it clear: Savyon and Ganei Yehuda used to be two separated localities until 2003, when they were merged. Since then the joint municipal regional council is called Savyon-Ganei Yehuda. Therefor we should merge the separated boundaries into one locality. I suggest you do it.
flohoff (2018-11-07 12:46:34+00:00): Moin Zurbagan,
ich hab hier den Changeset gesehen. Wieso ist denn auf dem Parkplatz am Bootsanleger der weg auf dem Parkplatz ein track? 

Ist das nicht ein service/parking_aisle?


Flo
Zurbagan (2018-11-07 19:29:04+00:00): Hello. Assigned tag - highway:service
flohoff (2018-11-08 11:31:33+00:00): Jau,
prima - Danke - Ich habe noch das verbleibende tracktype=grade1 entfernt 

Danke


Flo
Chrysopras (2018-11-06 10:06:31+00:00): Da habe ich mich aber auch vertippt, nämlich im Changeset-Kommentar. Also: In addr:city gehört (natürlich) „Eppingen“, in addr:suburb, wenn man/frau/x es angeben möchte, „Elsenz“.
osmviborg (2018-11-06 10:19:33+00:00): Punktet her, som ligger på bar mark, er i 6,5 m. Er du sikker på placeringen?
lakedistrict (2018-11-08 11:02:14+00:00): Do you know how it is accessed at the E end, given that https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/158651947 is tagged access=private? I'm guessing that foot and cycle access are allowed and that it's not a driveway but part of Kershaw Drive.
gurglypipe (2018-11-12 11:54:48+00:00): Good question, I’ll need to go and take a look at Kershaw Drive. Seems a bit odd that half of the loop is classed as private.
gurglypipe (2018-11-16 10:34:10+00:00): I drove round it this morning (Mapillary images are currently pending approval). I can’t see any ‘private’ restrictions — just looks like a normal (fancy) estate road to me, so I’ve retagged it as a non-private, residential road (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64560623). I’ll update the area in more detail once the Mapillary images are approved and I can actually look at them again.

I think the cycle path actually extends further up Quernmore Road to the west than I had it from the blog posts, so I’ll fix that at the same time.
lakedistrict (2018-11-16 10:51:56+00:00): Thanks for checking and correcting. :)
osmviborg (2018-11-06 10:17:35+00:00): Hvis du vil angive navnet på en ejendom, så brug name=* på bygningen.
osmviborg (2018-11-06 10:30:15+00:00): Skoven _er_ tegnet, som polygon.
osmviborg (2018-11-06 10:30:40+00:00): Skoven _er_ tegnet, som polygon.
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-11-06 12:04:04+00:00): Hello, why did you argue this isnt a man_made object? theres a concrete pier there, isnt it? will ahve to revert your changeset, unless the pier was removed or you prove otherwise
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-11-06 12:09:55+00:00): And to prove this is man made, heres a photo (the second one) of the Portuguese maritime authority with the pier https://www.amn.pt/Media/Paginas/DetalheNoticia.aspx?nid=1509
unless it was destroyed...which i highly doubt as that would have been announced.
Waiting for your reply
dmlu (2018-11-06 12:10:38+00:00): My bad! I must've missed it. I'll revert my changes. Thanks for pointing it out.
dmlu (2018-11-06 12:22:37+00:00): Reverted my changeset. If possible, could you change the node into an area covering the concrete pier?
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2018-11-06 12:24:51+00:00): Will revert this edit and add as a area. Also to clear things, this isn't technically a pier but a quay. Will fix later on.
osmviborg (2018-11-06 10:38:35+00:00): Anlægget _er_ angivet, på polygonen.
AkuAnakTimur (2018-11-13 18:25:10+00:00): Can you please check for your error: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/488381471/history

A landuse has been turned into a highway? I've personally been there myself last year, it's not a highway that huge.
sans_r (2018-11-13 18:31:19+00:00): Hi AkuAnakTimur,

Thanks for your time and feedback.
Edited by mistake, and will ensure such edits are not repeated.

Thank You,
sans_r
eggie (2018-11-06 10:39:21+00:00): In ieder geval een goede oefening om landuse en water onder de knie te krijgen. 'k Zou in ieder geval ook nog naar de plugin kijken en die zeer behoedzaam toepassen. Net even getest in een slootjesgebied met wateroverlap. De slootjes worden keurig uitgesneden, maar daarna is nog wel werk te doen aan het weghalen van lege nodes en de landuse weer op orde brengen.
eggie (2018-11-06 10:49:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-11-06 10:52:47+00:00): Weliswaar geen amateur als VTT. oneway=no hoef je niet te taggen op reguliere wegen. Dat doen we alleen als er kans is dat een andere mapper oneway=yes gaat taggen. Bv op een parallel fietspad. 

MVG,
Eggie
chnav (2018-11-06 12:06:40+00:00): Номера домов надо помещать в поле addr:housenumber, а их адресную улицу в поле addr:street, иначе не будет работать адресный поиск. Спасибо.
berndw (2018-11-06 13:47:24+00:00): Hallo Henning

ich denke, die Beschränkung für diesen Weg ist auf vehicle=agricultural beschränkt, ein access=no dürfte dann unnötig sein
eggie (2018-11-06 11:52:33+00:00): construction=yes doet niet zo veel in OSM
Beter dan highway=construction met construction=cycleway taggen. 
Dit was je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64225973
eggie (2018-11-06 11:55:50+00:00): In English..
construction=yes is not the right tag.
A possible tag:
highway=construction
construction= cycleway
eoinbutler (2018-11-06 12:36:39+00:00): Thanks, have changed.
berndw (2018-11-06 13:43:14+00:00): Hallo Henning
Willkommen bei OSM
Der richtige Wert für einen Feldweg ist track, mit tracktype und surface wäre noch besser

Bernd
chnav (2018-11-06 12:04:00+00:00): Hi, please do not describe objects in WikiMapia style, putting description in the name field. Thanks.
Здравствуйте, пожалуйста не помещайте описание объекта в поле name, у нас не Викимапия. Спасибо.
chnav (2018-11-06 12:05:12+00:00): Будет ещё лучше если вы объясните что там расположено и мы придумаем правильную комбинацию тегов.
berndw (2018-11-06 13:49:01+00:00): Der neue Weg in diesem Changeset ist auch als Feldweg(=track) auf Luftbildern zu erkennen

Bernd
Nmxosm (2018-11-07 12:50:22+00:00): Würden Sie bitte beschreibende Changesetkommentare verwenden? Das hilft anderen Beitragenden, Ihre Änderungen besser nachzuvollziehen. Siehe auch: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:%C3%84nderungssatz 
Vielen Dank.

Could you please use descriptive changeset comments? This helps other contributors to understand your changes more easily. See also: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset 
Thank you
flohoff (2018-11-07 11:50:39+00:00): Moin Christian,

Un diesem changeset ist mir aufgefallen das du am Südlichen Ende den Fußweg an den Landuse "angeschlossen" hast - Warum? Da kann man ja nicht drauf weiter gehen.

Entweder geht das weiter bis zur Straße oder der endet da - dann brauch der aber keinen Anschluss.

So long

Flo
Anakil (2018-11-09 12:15:30+00:00): Bonjour Jacques Rezer,

Merci de ta contribution. Attention à ne pas oublier de mettre les attributs ("tags") après avoir tracé des points, lignes ou polygones ! Aussi attention à bien faire des polygones pour les maisons (une ligne fermée qui se finit où elle a commencé) et pas un zig-zag comme c'était le cas pour un des bâtiments). 

Happy mapping,
Anakil
OpenStreetMap Belgium
berndw (2018-11-06 13:26:32+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Reaktion
Ich war vorhin vor Ort

Ich habe noch zusätzlich den Fußweg eingetragen, sowie die Beschränkungen der Straße auf Anlieger bis zu Baustelle.
 Die Baustelle habe ich ein wenig in die angrenzenden Straßen erweitert.

Bis auf weiteres bin ich dort fertig

Weiterhin viel Spaß

Bernd
b-jazz (2018-11-06 19:30:14+00:00): What type of business is this?
Anakil (2018-11-09 12:23:07+00:00): Hi Paulo1b, thanks for your contribution. A small problem i see is that you had "broken" the polygon of the building by not "connecting the node" when deleting one part of it. 
I corrected it, but watch out when deleting things ! ;-) 

Happy mapping,
Anakil
OpenStreetMap Belgium
pitscheplatsch (2018-11-06 20:29:34+00:00): Hi ojirotp, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several mapped highways and tracks? Thanks.

See https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64227196
wambacher (2018-11-07 12:53:08+00:00): And you deleted boundaries of uganda state too.
 see https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1406-countries-compare-2018-11-07

this boundaries have been recovered.

Please do not delete any ways which you don't know.

walter
wambacher (2018-11-07 12:57:04+00:00): @pitscheplatsch: hab deinen Kommentar zu spät gelesen und die Boundaries bereits restauriert (undelete). falls du einen full Revert machen willst und dich mein Kram stört: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/64261348 kannst du ruhig vorher reverten.
walter
rab (2018-11-11 18:27:20+00:00): Ich habe es mal revertiert bevor es vergessen wird. Die neuen Gebäude habe ich per copy und paste wieder eingefügt.

@ojirotp
start here:

https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=112&error=119110266

fix 20 similar errors and wie will forget this little incident :)
wambacher (2018-11-11 23:22:49+00:00): morgen seh ich, ob du dabei "meine" Boundaries geschreddert hast ;)

Gruss
walter
rab (2018-11-12 19:08:00+00:00): noch mal gut gegangen?
wambacher (2018-11-12 23:32:19+00:00): 1 Grenze war put, wurde aber bereits von Kollegen gefixt.
rab (2018-11-13 17:41:23+00:00): Dann werde ich zur Strafe jetzt wohl ein paar Grenzpolygone flicken müssen.
wambacher (2018-11-13 17:56:36+00:00): Gerne. brauchst nur hier zu gugge: https://wambachers-osm.website/index.php/10-osm-reports/1412-countries-compare-2018-11-13

jeden Mittag ne neue Liste. Siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=61207  (immer ganz am Ende) oder als RSS-Feed: https://wambachers-osm.website/rss/Missing_Boundaries.rss

Gruss
walter
j numminen (2018-11-06 11:33:56+00:00): Lähteinä https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Fi:WikiProject_Finland/Piirto-ohjeet ja https://kartta.hel.fi
DaveF (2018-11-06 17:48:18+00:00): Hi 
Welcome to OSM. 
Something's gone wrong with your edit. What is it you're trying to achieve?
CinimodEE (2018-11-06 19:08:47+00:00): I was trying to add in the access road from Hamilton Road  round the top of Kingswood Prep School
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:48+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
eggie (2018-11-06 12:15:32+00:00): Dag Yorick.. probeer svp je edits te beschrijven. Dus wat je hebt toegevoegd. 
Dus bicycle= designated omgezet in destination.
mavl (2019-02-22 16:54:41+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
user_8655426 (2018-11-06 12:28:53+00:00): 鉄道駅
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:鉄道駅

building=train_station
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Tag:building%3Dtrain_station

地物ひとつにOSM要素はひとつ
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:地物ひとつにOSM要素はひとつ
mavl (2019-07-21 11:49:52+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: copyrighted data were used.
mavl (2019-02-22 16:54:45+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-02-22 16:54:49+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Stereo (2018-11-06 12:17:30+00:00): Le rond-point à côté et la N88 au bout aussi?
foxandpotatoes (2018-11-07 09:18:24+00:00): Oui, c'est exact ! La modification a été faite dans le cadre de la formation donnée ce 6 novembre à l'EPN d'Arlon. Elle sera complétée par "jfonda" à qui je signale que le nom du rond-point doit également être mis à jour.

Merci.

Pierre Parmentier
SomeoneElse_Revert (2018-11-15 08:04:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 64516990 where the changeset comment is: Reverting unsourced edits around Bulgaria.  All attempts to contact the mapper have failed
viloan (2018-11-06 12:14:18+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
maraf24 (2018-11-11 10:08:52+00:00): Nieprawda, to nie jest centrum Ziębic.