piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Kovoschiz (2022-02-16 22:38:27+00:00): Separate lines are only used when there are physical separation. This is already represented by `landuse=construction` and `construction:lanes=`.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Leo Slager (2022-02-19 12:58:29+00:00): Dag padvinder,

Met 20 foutmeldingen "ring not closed" heb je de omgeving van De Stulp dermate in de vernieling geholpen dat ik voornemens ben om al deze changesets te reverten.
Graag een reactie.
padvinder (2022-02-19 15:58:13+00:00): Ja, ik weet het. Het is een puinzooi. Ik weet niet waar het begonnen is. Ik ben nog doende e.e.a. te proberen recht te breien, dat het i.i.g. weer toonbaar wordt. Maar als jij zaken terug wil zetten, maak ik geen bezwaar.
Leo Slager (2022-02-19 16:30:29+00:00): Zowel De Stulp als de boswachterij De Hooge Vuursche zijn hersteld in de oorspronkelijke vorm.
Soshal Distan Singh (2022-02-17 02:17:20+00:00): Номера школ указываются здесь:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/465418160
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/874468346

На самих зданиях дублировать необходимости нет.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
marczoutendijk (2022-02-16 14:58:45+00:00): In this changeset I changed an obvious typo and the choices were either pole or tower. Given the nearby other power=pole, my choice is clear (but could be wrong)
praeteritum (2023-05-03 05:27:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135641645.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
Xandrex (2022-06-21 23:10:07+00:00): Bonjour, pouvez-vous vérifier ce changeset ? vous avez indiqué une borne incendie, mais je vois un segment sans type.
Marc Lécuyer (2022-06-24 05:49:13+00:00): Vous avez raison, la borne est bonne, et le segment etait une erreur.
Merci pour votre vigilance
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:57:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
bxl-forever (2022-02-16 17:11:21+00:00): Thanks for fixing street names.  I also updated the building addresses accordingly.

Just one thing: please do not change the "source:maxspeed" tag.  This is a reserved tag and it should validate against a predefined list.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:08:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-02-16 17:08:02+00:00): Dag PMN..

width=2 heb ik op de wegversmalling laten staan, maar van de rest van de weg verwijderd.
Ook lanes=0 heb ik verwijderd.
Dat kan onmogelijk. 
Op de plaats van de wegversmalling heb ik een traffic_calming=choker getagd op een node.
Denk dat het nu correct gemapt is.
MVG
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
lyctkel (2022-06-24 19:31:58+00:00): Hi  J_Hutch,
currently I'm investigating some rarely used building=* tags.
In the process I found https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/930048293 and three more tags which uses building=trail.
This tag is only used here.
It looks to me as if you are not aware of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dstatic_caravan.
I have corrected the four tags and hope that is OK for you.
Regards,
lyctkel
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
DP24PH (2022-02-17 11:16:22+00:00): ALERT: It seems that the building info got altered without any notice from OSMPH Local Communities that may pose certain issues. You may consider holding the tag correction for the matter.


DP24
del_account (2022-03-31 08:11:12+00:00): Ok thanks for the warning!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:57:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:05:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:08:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:50+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
TsymbalAV (2022-02-16 16:07:05+00:00): Участок отмечен ошибочно. Откатите пожалуйста этот пакет. Спасибо!
aixbrick (2022-02-17 07:49:30+00:00): Hallo,
construction_start_expected ergibt nur Sinn in Verbindung mit anderen Tags, siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Aconstruction_start_expected. construction_end_expected ist "deprecated", siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction%20end%20expected.
Außerdem sind weder die Straße noch die Schienen unterhalb der Brücke Teil der eigentlichen Maßnahme. Sie sind maximal (zeitweilig) gesperrt.
Mir erschließt sich also nicht so ganz, warum du die Tags ergänzt hast? Wer wertet das in dieser Form aus?
Gruß
praeteritum (2023-05-03 05:21:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135641584.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
4004 (2022-02-27 23:49:53+00:00): не удаляйте пожалуйста ссылку на заправку
praeteritum (2023-05-03 05:18:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135641519.
ivanbranco (2022-02-16 19:47:44+00:00): Hi CHAINDER19,

what's the source for this wood deletion: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7980476

From the Bing imagery (which you used) is still present.

Also could you try to write descriptive changeset comments? The name of the city you edited in or "000" are not really helpful. See: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

Also could you reply to other users questions? I previously asked you if you could please check this tags out but I got no response: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1g1U
Maybe you meant to use addr:place?

Автоматизированный перевод: Привет CHAINDER19,

из какого источника взято это удаление дерева: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7980476.

На снимках Bing (которые вы использовали) оно все еще присутствует.

Также не могли бы вы попытаться написать описательные комментарии к изменениям? Название города, который вы редактировали, или "000" не очень-то помогают. См.: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

Также не могли бы вы отвечать на вопросы других пользователей? Я уже спрашивал вас, не могли бы вы проверить эти теги, но не получил ответа: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1g1U.
Может быть, вы хотели использовать addr:place?

Переведено с помощью www.DeepL.com/Translator (бесплатная версия)
Vinber-Pro (2022-03-02 16:35:19+00:00): Bonjour,
pour le marché de La Haye, j'ai l'impression qu'il y a un distongo enrte l'été et l'hiver mais c'est quand même au même endroit (sans doute plus ou moins étendu) et toujours les mercredi matin ?

peut-être que c'est suffisant non ?

Plutôt que 2 marchés avec des noms différents ?
COCMOP (2022-03-03 10:11:10+00:00): Bonjour. Oui c'est un choix fait du fait que le marché d'été est beaucoup plus étendu que celui d'hiver. L'idée est de ne pas survendre le marché d'hiver, ce qui pourrait faire des déçus.
Vinber-Pro (2022-03-04 13:06:16+00:00): oui.
je pense que son étendu n'est peut-être pas le plus important.
L'important c'est la tenue d'un marché tout l'année non ?

tous les mercredi matin.

ce qui m'interpelle c'est le fait qu'il y a bien un marché toute l'année et là on sépare en 2 marchés. Cela concerne le même lieu.
Je suppose que cela ne concerne pas la même surface et le même nombre de marchands (peut-être préférer un "simple node" et dans la description apporter cette différence de taille ?).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:59:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:01:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:04:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:00:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
aceman444 (2023-07-10 22:20:48+00:00): Zdravim, toto skor vyzera ako budova vratnice, nie ako bytovy dom.
vlakos555 (2023-07-11 05:47:30+00:00): Ano. Je to vratnica. Nepouzivana. Bol som to pozrieť na mieste.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:07:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 21:58:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:06:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-23 22:03:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 120102796 where the changeset comment is: Following complaints to the DWG and discussion with Mapbox, reverting some changes by a Mapbox editor. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5868 and previous blocks.
pio2_122 (2022-02-16 18:24:55+00:00): Dlaczego w kilku przypadkach został usunięty tag leisure=nature_reserve,np. https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/423722360 ?
ptarac (2022-02-16 19:12:33+00:00): Tag leisure=nature_reserve odnosi się do rezerwatu przyrody. Żaden z obiektów, z których usunąłem ten tag, nie jest rezerwatem przyrody w myśl ustawy o ochronie przyrody. Są to użytki ekologiczne, czyli inna forma ochrony przyrody. 
Ponadto zastosowałem boundary=protected_area, który wg Wiki:"is a more recently introduced tag with a more verbose tagging scheme which can deal with all kind of protections and protection levels. It attempts to encompass both nature reserves and national parks, and is used more and more.".
pio2_122 (2022-02-16 22:40:14+00:00): Dzięki za wyjaśnienie.
Okazuje się więc, że tagowanie praktycznie wszystkich użytków ekologicznych w Polsce wymaga poprawy, ponieważ ponad 6 lat temu zostały one całościowo zaimportowane do OSM z bazy GDOŚ. Możliwe, że wtedy kwestia tagowania nie była jeszcze na tyle jasna i dobrze opisana na wiki, co poskutkowało takim schematem tagowania.

Zgodnie z OSM-wiki w takim przypadkach powinno się usunąć tag leisure=nature_reserve i zmienić wartość tagu protect_class=19 na 6. Gdy natknę się podczas moich edycji na takie obiekty, postaram się pamiętać, aby poprawić ich tagowanie.
ptarac (2022-02-17 12:39:52+00:00): Tag protect_class zostawiamy z wartością 19, bo dotyczy ona innych krajowych form ochrony przyrody (FOP). Jest to zgodne z OSM-wiki. 
6 dotyczy wyłącznie IUCN'owej kategorii VI. Naszekrajowe "małe" FOP, czyli użytki ekologiczne, stanowiska dokumentacyjne, zespoły przyrodnicze, pomniki przyrody nie mieszczą się w tej kategorii chociażby ze względu na niewielką powierzchnię.
pio2_122 (2022-02-17 12:43:10+00:00): Hmm... Ja na OSM-wiki znalazłem następującą informację:
protect_class=19 - other national, This tag was used by an import in Poland for "Użytek ekologiczny" areas. Instead of this value, consider using protect_class=6 for areas protected for "sustainable use of natural resources".

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:protect_class#Resources-protected-area