piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
literan (2016-08-09 20:19:53+00:00): Лес починил. Вы там в двух местах точки не смерджили (не соединили). А у вас в JOSM стоит плагин reltoolbox? Там же такое на раз видно
nhdr (2016-08-09 20:26:47+00:00): reltoolbox у меня стоит, но моя проблема в том, что я не до конца понимаю как работать как раз с этим смердживанием. Я его увидел сразу, что точки не соеденены, но я вот до сих пор не соображу как я должен был просто поправить это недоразумение
nhdr (2016-08-09 20:28:33+00:00): очень мало везде инструкций, приходится на опыте набивать. Но наверняка люди josm проводят в москве какие-нибудь встречи по ликбезу, не в курсе?
literan (2016-08-09 21:18:58+00:00): просто ткнуть на одну из лежащих рядом несоединенных точек и нажать M (латинскую). G - наоборот, разделить точки. P (латинская) - разорвать линию в точке. Насчет встреч по ликбезу ничего не слышал, но сам учился по видеоурокам, поищите в форуме или просто в инете
DD1GJ (2016-08-07 20:55:32+00:00): Hallo smarties, wieso taggst Du jede Menge Rettungspunkte entgegen dem Wiki um? Der Name "Notfallpunkt ..." ist redundant und emergency=yes überflüssig wie ein Kropf. Solche mechanischen Edits sollten *** vorher *** diskutiert werden!
smarties (2016-08-08 10:54:50+00:00): Hi,
 
1. Laut Wiki ist der Name optional, das bedeutet er ist eindeutig definiert und gehört optional dazu. Wieso bemängelst Du etwas was sogar im Wiki drinsteht?
2. Weil auf den Schildern nunmal genau der Name "Notfalltreffpunkt HK-01" steht. Das ist der Name des Punktes.

Wobei mir gerade auffällt das ich das wörtchen "-treff-" vergessen habe.
 
Ich finde emergency nicht überflüssig. Da die Punkte zu der Gruppe emergency dazugehören.
 
**Massenedits** sollen vorher besprochen werden, dies ist im Wiki und auch der Talk so besprochen worden. Es wurde aber auch darüber gesprochen was ein Massenedit ist, und da solltest Du lieber nochmal nachlesen. Denn 40 Punkte sind definitiv kein Massenedit.
 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Stephan
aka smarties
naoliv (2016-08-08 17:29:18+00:00): Marcone, já existe um posto de combustível nesse local onde você inseriu um novo.
chnav (2016-08-08 11:40:10+00:00): персональная POI, исправил
MKnight (2016-08-07 21:32:04+00:00): Meines Wissens gibt es hier keine Einschränkungen zum Befahren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436107495

Also wäre es schlimmstenfalls parking=costumers, aber selbst das wäre mir neu.
Rogehm (2016-08-08 17:12:26+00:00): Ok. Bin nur zufällig die Tage mehrmals vorbeigefahren auf "Kleiner Reise" u.a. in Weimar. Nehme die Beschränkung wieder raus.
MKnight (2016-08-08 19:41:24+00:00): Ich nehme sie wieder rein ;)
Allerdings als parking=customers
MKnight (2016-08-08 19:42:38+00:00): Meh, das wiki sieht diesen Fall nicht vor, na klasse.
MKnight (2016-08-08 19:46:57+00:00): Gut, access ist wieder drin, dafür hab ich den service access=yes spendiert.
hsimpson (2016-09-04 09:07:08+00:00): Hi, why did you change the Kampala - Masaka Road from primary to unclassified?
Carnildo (2016-08-08 03:09:31+00:00): Are you sure you've got "Boat Ramp" tagged properly?  The name and position imply it's a "leisure=slipway", but you've marked it as an "amenity=parking".
Maarten Deen (2017-05-06 10:58:54+00:00): Hoi Jaap, ik heb de Meinweg weer teruggezet naar unclassified. Dit is geen fietspad (bord G11) maar een fietsstraat.
Getagd volgens https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:The_Netherlands_roads_tagging
maraf24 (2016-08-07 20:07:04+00:00): Zmieniłeś tu nazwę miejscowości, dlatego wycofałem zmiany.
Zbigniew_Cz (2016-08-07 20:14:21+00:00): Kolejna marna edycja spod Maps.me....
mavl (2019-04-25 16:47:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
aceman444 (2016-08-07 22:33:28+00:00): Sind da wirklich 2 "Jedlik Ányis István" artworks? in Zemne? Sind es Statuen?

Wenn Du building=church+amenity=place_of_worship tags, bitte auch Religion und Denomination beitragen. Danke.
mavl (2019-04-25 16:47:06+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-25 16:47:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
freeExec (2016-08-11 06:14:40+00:00): Трансформаторную будку угнали?
Anto110 (2016-08-11 06:45:16+00:00): Она бала нанесена на карте прямо на дворовый проезд. Проезжая там на автомобиле, лично не увидел какой либо будки. Либо она была просто нанесена не точно на карту, либо я был просто невнимателен за рулем.
Если она действительно там имеется,  тогда моя ошибка.
freeExec (2016-08-11 06:48:24+00:00): Да, там была большая кирпичная и маленький вагончик, который и удалил.
mavl (2019-04-26 16:32:47+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-26 16:32:58+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-26 16:32:55+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
mavl (2019-04-26 16:33:02+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
luschi (2016-08-19 13:32:20+00:00): Hi,
what is a motebo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436120590
you are the only user in OSM that using this key.
And OSM-Wiki not have any documentation about this key
highflyer74 (2016-08-09 06:37:04+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OSM!

Ich habe gesehen, daß Du Informationen zu OSM hinzugefügt hast, was sehr gut ist. Bitte denke daran, daß die hinzugefügten Daten nach dem OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) getaggt werden müssen, damit sie für andere Menschen nutzbar gemacht werden können. Ansonsten kann Software, die die Einträge nutzen möchte, diese nicht lesen.

In diesem Fall liegt die Bäckerei fast auf der Straße... In welchem Gebäude befindet sie sich denn? Bewege den Punkt bitte in das Gebäude, in dem sich der POI befindet.

Wenn Du weiterhin Lust hast, bei OSM mitzuarbeiten, würde ich Dir empfehlen, einen richtigen Editor wie iD oder am besten JOSM zu verwenden. maps.me ist zum Editieren keine gute Idee, da es nicht den aktuellen Stand der Datenbank abbildet und es somit oft zu Doppeleintragungen und anderen Problemen kommt.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, immer her damit!

Viele Grüße,

highflyer74
eric_ (2016-08-08 15:36:11+00:00): Thanks Donald. I thought it was ok to add them already as buildings because their construction is going to start very soon (less than a month) and because the area is tagged as landuse=construction.

But you're right, it's clearer the way you mapped it. Thanks.
mavl (2019-04-26 16:33:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted.
Supaplex (2016-08-10 09:59:10+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
smaprs (2018-01-22 14:09:54+00:00): Olá,  
este tipo de estrada pública vicinal que passa por diversas propriedades ou localidades não deve ser track mesmo, mas no mínimo unclassified:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/258302489/history
Track somente onde só passa trator.    
Veja mais informações em:
smaprs (2018-01-22 14:11:18+00:00): Sobretudo estas que ligam 2 "cidades" podem até ser terciárias:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436138875
tomao44 (2016-08-11 12:05:48+00:00): Les chemins ajoutés n'ont pas d'attributs !
Tu peux importer ta trace GPS, puis modifier la carte ensuite si besoin.
Viking81 (2017-06-07 15:41:04+00:00): I'm going to delete redundant ways without tags
tyr_asd (2017-04-26 09:14:14+00:00): I'm not sure, but is "amenity=embassy" (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=embassy) really the right tag for this? For example, this https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48597553 doesn't look like an embassy at all!?
fayor (2017-04-26 13:25:54+00:00): Sono d'accordo con te che non è il tag esattamente corretto... ma al momento è quello che mi era sembrato più aderente alla realtà. Non è sicuramente un confine amministrativo.
naoliv (2016-08-08 11:53:42+00:00): Please, don't add such fictional objects here. This map is not the proper place for this.
delete-this-user (2016-08-08 18:51:45+00:00): Hey Mr.Right ...
This are Places in Germany and they may for our people here.
Write to me in german or let me alone!
This Places are marked as "private" in Maps.me!
Why can you see them?! Just go away and save some whales!
naoliv (2016-08-08 18:55:02+00:00): You didn't save them in your phone, but you actually sent the places to the public server.
delete-this-user (2016-08-08 18:58:08+00:00): Then the App (MAPS.ME) was having a bad joke with me... this places shouldn't be public! X(
Only for our local communtiy!
naoliv (2016-08-08 19:07:28+00:00): Maybe "Einen Ort hinzufügen" is not properly translated or it isn't clear that the data that you insert there will be sent to a public server.
delete-this-user (2016-08-08 19:13:16+00:00): Yes, I only clicked on "Einen Ort hinzufürgen" on this App. 
I will use an other service. 
Unfortunately I can't delete this account.
I will warn everyone at my community and friends, using this service. It's not gamer-friendly.
alphensebezorger (2017-01-09 21:53:27+00:00): Hallo JanWandelaar,
Als ik me niet vergis is in deze changeset de Oostrumse Beek voor een kilometer of twee in een duiker verdwenen. Deze weg www.openstreetmap.org/way/117392804 heeft namelijk een tag tunnel=culvert. Dat is vast een vergissing. Moest het ergens een kleiner stuk wezen?
JanWandelaar (2017-01-11 20:23:20+00:00): Inderdaad een foutje. Ik denk dat het ergens met copy&paste fout is gegaan. Is aangepast.
keithonearth (2017-01-13 09:14:58+00:00): This is a highly political edit, and OSM is interested in the reality on the ground, not Historic agreements.
jim197 (2016-08-07 18:23:02+00:00): Oops, the comment is wrong. It should say "Created 102, 104, 106, 108, 110 and 112 Napier Road".
JJJWegdam (2021-01-30 12:04:14+00:00): What does the railway:jkv tag mean?
anttihav (2021-01-30 12:43:29+00:00): Automatic train protection, "junakulunvalvonta" (JKV) in Finnish. More specific international term of the system is ATP-VR/RHK.
JJJWegdam (2021-01-30 12:55:47+00:00): Thanks for the fast reply and explanation
Hjart (2016-08-08 10:31:20+00:00): Kan du uploade de gps-spor du har lavet, så vi andre kan have glæde af dem også?
kreuzschnabel (2019-09-14 19:09:50+00:00): Hallo Jens, der Querweg durch den Wald wurde von dir bicycle=no getaggt, also für Radfahrer verboten. Er ist aber Teil der Radroute „Langwedel erFAHREN“, die ich gerade nach einem zur Verfügung gestellten GPX einpflege. Hast du die Möglichkeit, nochmal nachzuschauen, ob da wirklich ein Radfahrverbot besteht? Wenn ja, muss der Betreiber der Radroute tätig werden.
Jens_Kuespert (2019-09-15 04:44:43+00:00): Hallo Kreuzschnabel. Nein, zur Zeit kann ich das nicht überprüfen. Wenn ich mich richtig erinnere, war das mehr ein Pfad als ein Weg und deswegen habe ich das Rad als Verkehrsmittel ausgeschlossen. Vielleicht ist die Verbindung neu befestigt worden? Ich denke, das Tag zu entfernen, ist in Ordnung.
kreuzschnabel (2019-09-15 07:16:12+00:00): Danke für die schnelle Antwort, dann wird der Weg wohl ausgebaut worden sein. Bitte grundsätzlich nur bestehende Verbote mit bicycle=no taggen. Für „Eignung“ gibt es mtb:scale=*, wo Freizeitradler einfach alle Werte über 0 meiden können: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:mtb:scale
naoliv (2016-08-08 11:50:15+00:00): Danilo, por favor, não adicione locais fictícios ao mapa.
Aqui não é o local certo para isso.
Владимир К (2016-09-20 12:15:07+00:00): на этой линии https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334728687 велодорожка?
RFuser11 (2016-09-20 19:31:14+00:00): ну на самом деле не только вело, я только в Potlatch добавил bicycle: Allowed.
Владимир К (2016-09-21 08:35:28+00:00): ну то есть там разметили велодорожку? или знаки поставили? просто последний раз когда там был, обычный тротуар асфальтовый кажется был и всё
RFuser11 (2016-09-22 13:32:17+00:00): знаков таких там не видел, если этот тэг вас смущает, верните ему значение по умолчанию
Владимир К (2016-09-22 19:33:04+00:00): а какое значение по умолчанию? просто тэг bicycle=yes означает, что там есть настоящая официальная велодорожка. если там просто пешеходная дрожка, то надо его убрать.
RFuser11 (2016-09-23 09:39:49+00:00): надеюсь в такой редакции всех все устраивает и вопрос можно считать закрытым? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334728687
Владимир К (2016-09-23 11:18:56+00:00): ну если это соответствует действительности, то конечно устраивает :) всё что я хотел выяснить, действительно есть ли там велодорожка
flrea (2023-01-07 13:35:22+00:00): A quoi correspond la relation "arcachon" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6475141/) introduite dans ce changeset ?
Flavien_breizh (2023-01-09 16:54:34+00:00): A l'époque, je voulais  faire ressortir les pistes cyclables. Suite à un échange, vu avec ? , on m'a informé que seuls les itinéraires sont à modéliser. De plus, la carte cyclable a depuis été créée.
Je viens donc de supprimer cette relation.
kocio (2016-09-13 02:17:48+00:00): Gdzie właściwie leży ta apteka: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/356989487 ? W tej chwili jest zaznaczona na Egejskiej, tzn. na ulicy.
trigpoint (2016-08-08 14:01:49+00:00): Hi Mike
Something seems to have gone a bit wrong.here, you seem to have removed the.ways from this through route relation.
What.were you trying to achieve or what did you see wrong here?
 Cheers Phil
Mike Baggaley (2016-08-08 16:57:01+00:00): Hi Phil, my understanding of the through_route relation is that it should have two ways and one common node to indicate the normal way ahead. This relation had more that two ways connected to it and was causing warnings to be generated in a process I use based on the OSM data. I was going to try to sort out what was wrong with the relation, but noticed that according to http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/through_route, the feature has been rejected, so I just deleted the relation instead. Please accept my apologies if I have misunderstood the use of the relation or you were using it - feel free to reinstate a correct relation.

Regards,
Mike
trigpoint (2016-08-08 20:36:27+00:00): Thank you for your reply Mike.
The number of ways had increased, caused by adding speed limits.
Had not realised the proposal had been rejected, although it is important and should be revived at some point. I am quite surprised by the lack of understanding in some of the comments, these junctions are not that unusual.
I will put the relation back, but ensure it has only two ways.
Phil
Sanniu (2025-12-30 08:26:08+00:00): Hi, can you add the street names to addresses to make them search-able?
Flayer (2025-12-30 08:29:31+00:00): Hi, yes, I'll do it.
muralito (2016-08-09 12:02:09+00:00): Lo puse como leisure=fitness_centre
MKnight (2016-08-07 21:15:44+00:00): Ich bezweifle, dass an der Stelle ein Hotel ist...
Smiljan_02 (2016-08-25 08:38:31+00:00): Ich bezweifele das nicht nur, ich lösch das jetzt auch.
muralito (2016-08-07 22:50:19+00:00): Hola. El tramo que eliminaste ¿no quedo como peatonal?
aristide (2018-11-10 13:59:31+00:00): bicycle=no bedeutet ein Radfahrverbot. Wurden denn dort in jüngster Zeit Schilder zum Verbot von Radfahren, Reiten, Ski- und Snowboardfahren aufgestellt?
Hartkerius (2018-11-11 12:09:07+00:00): Upps, das muss ein Versehen sein. Ich kann mir nicht erklären, wie das zustandekam. Habe die falschen Zugangsbeschränkungen entfernt.
aristide (2018-11-11 19:02:39+00:00): Danke, Hartkerius, für deine superschnelle Reaktion! In der Praxis haben die tags sowieso keinen Benutzer des Radwegs Dalberg-Argenschwang davon abgehalten, mal einen Schlenker über die Burg zu fahren.
sabas88 (2016-08-08 09:51:05+00:00): In mancanza dei marciapiedi per il routing (il calcolo dei percorsi) così direi che va bene :-)
KrisFr (2016-09-07 08:40:21+00:00): To jest budynek szkoły i przedszkola - więcej info: http://zs-p1-lodz.pl/?page_id=10
josef050153 (2016-08-10 07:07:55+00:00): The correct name ist 'Comunità Castellazzo'
Marián Kyral (2016-08-08 09:56:51+00:00): Hi,
You moved Autovrakoviště from correct place (Dobrá 203) to incorrect place (Dobrá 79). Fix it please.

http://www.milata.cz/kontakt/
LucFreitas (2016-08-09 12:25:19+00:00): Bom dia, Thundercel.

A Estrada Jerônimo Monteiro é uma via coletora de maior importância na hierarquização do tráfego nesta região de Vila Velha. Havia movido para secundária em razão disto.

A tag railway=abandoned e gauge=1000 adicionei em razão desta via ter surgido a partir de um sistema de bondes, desativado na década de 1970.

O Plano Diretor Municipal de Vila Velha classifica estas vias em razão de sua importância para a rede viária municipal. Você pode ver o mapa e umas sugestões que eu dei de hierarquização em: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vila_Velha
Thundercel (2016-08-09 13:37:13+00:00): Neste domingo passado me desloquei para Pedra Azul e no retorno observei que o roteamento priorizava essa Estrada Jerônimo Monteiro que encontava-se como secundary. Essa estrada está tomada de lombadas (quebra-molas) e puxando indevidamente por isso o roteamento para ela enquanto o melhor caminho para Vila Velha é cruzando a segunda ponte/ costeando o porto/ pedagio / terceira ponte ou descer pela Carlos Lindenberg se não desejar passar pelo pedágio da terceira ponte.
Apesar das inumeras lombadas na Estrada Jeronimo Monteiro, a alterei para terciary considerando ser ela importante  na área e para não se igualar as residenciais ao redor. Classificação de vias é uma coisa muito emblemática e na minha opinião devemos sempre nos atentar não para mapas frios que designam vias como coletoras enquanto essas vias recebm muitas retenções de tráfego por questões de lombadas ou semaforos.
Thundercel (2016-08-09 13:49:26+00:00): Observando suas sugestões em http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vila_Velha identifico que originalmente a Estrada Jerônimo Monteiro estava mesmo como deixei agora (terciary). Ali voce propôs e alterou para secundary, entretanto na propria descrição da tabela cita "aspectos físicos da via" na análise e me perdoe, mas trafeguei por ela e pelos aspectos fisicos por mim observados ela nunca deveria ser secundary.
LucFreitas (2016-08-09 19:44:39+00:00): Entendo seu ponto de vista quanto a estrutura física da estrada Jerônimo Monteiro. Quando a classifiquei como secundária, estava observando o fato dela, por razões de importância local e histórica para cidade, se sobrepor as demais vias (a classificação atual de vias permite que uma via seja classificada como secundária simplesmente se sua velocidade for maior ou igual à 40km/h, se sobrepondo às terciárias ao redor na hierarquia viária). Quanto ao uso do Plano Diretor, eu acredito que ele não deve ser usado para classificar tudo (se não teríamos vias troncos ou primárias em locais absurdos, como nas ruas paralelas à Rodovia do Sol, na região de Itaparica), apenas para dar um norte e auxiliar o entendimento do grau de importância de cada via para a cidade. Mas, pessoalmente, defendo que deve haver um peso maior na classificação das vias em razão do sua relevância local, regional ou nacional.
Quanto ao roteamento, seria mais óbvio o motor de roteamento sugerir a passagem pela C. Lindemberg, por estar classificada como uma via troncal inicialmente e posteriormente como primária e secundária, além de não existir vias paralelas a ela que possuam a mesma hierarquia e velocidade estabelecidas no mapa.
Thundercel (2016-08-10 01:28:52+00:00): Na minha opinião classificação de via deve ter um balizador, mas o bom senso deve sempre atuar quando for aplicar determinada classificação. Emprego em meu veículo 2 aparelhos Garmin Nuvi carregados com o mesmo mapa Cocar que por sua vez emprega os dados OSM. Essa Estrada Jerônimo Monteiro pode até ter um peso na área, mas esse peso foi perdido a partir do momento que nela implantaram inumeras lombadas redutoras de velocidade. Considerando as lombadas nela não se desenvolve velocidade média superior a 30 km/h.
DemoLogin (2018-11-22 21:32:52+00:00): Подскажите, что значит "1:59,64; 2:55,60; 3:56,61; 4:57,62; 5:58,63" в теге addr:flats?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4340518729
Anton Khorev (2018-12-31 00:18:05+00:00): Могу догадаться, что это (номер этажа):(номера квартир на этаже через запятую); ...
DemoLogin (2019-01-09 09:10:26+00:00): Приведите, пожалуйста, в соответствие со стандартом.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr:flats
user_5359 (2016-08-18 03:38:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read the defintion of a embassy http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dembassy and add the value for country or change the tag.
user_5359 (2016-08-18 03:39:10+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You forgot to add any information to your node.
apm-wa (2016-08-08 15:02:15+00:00): Tajir kocesi no longer connects to Andalyb.  New traffic pattern.  Täjir köçesi уже не соединяется к Андалибу.  Теперь новая структура движения.
user_2842609 (2016-08-08 12:29:44+00:00): Salut,
Dans ce groupe de modifications tu as touché aux frontières administratives de l'Algérie, de Jijel et de Ziama Mansouriah. Or il ne fallait pas toucher :(
user_5359 (2016-08-18 03:45:16+00:00): Welcome to OSM! You are NOT a church! Please move the position of your business to the right building. For better desription of your business please read http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:healthcare and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Healthcare_2.0 .
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:10:03+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
jinalfoflia (2016-08-08 06:14:03+00:00): The changes I have made is not in accordance to my changeset comment. I have moved the tags from the way to the multipolygon and retagged the pond from natural=bay to natural=pond (Please refer to this ticket for more information -> https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/13270#comment:2)
user_5359 (2016-10-09 16:09:37+00:00): Hi, your map edit is similar to ones from a coordinated group of editors that we have found to be using a copyrighted source. But, I wanted to check with you to see whether that was the case or not--that way we don't potentially lose valuable data from a real user. So do you mind confirming whether this data was collected by you or if it was from another database/copyrighted geocoder? Thanks! user_5359
wambacher (2016-08-08 20:37:49+00:00): hi,

you "killed" 3 boundaries of your country, because you did severe errors.

see https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/index.php/10-osm-reports/647-countries-compare-2016-08-08 and my changeset http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/41332487

The editor iD is not a good editor for that job. try to switsh to josm, whicht is much much better and saver.


and:please add meaningfull comments to your changes. Three dots is not enought.

if you keep on using such micro-comments to your changes, you may be blocked by the data working group.
MMN-o (2016-08-08 07:47:01+00:00): Tjo! Även om jag håller med dig om att man borde kunna slippa ange höjden i meter så säger https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:height att det är acceptabelt :)
MMN-o (2016-08-08 07:47:17+00:00): ange att höjden är i meter* ;)
Erik Hagelberg (2016-08-08 07:58:46+00:00): Tjenare! Jo, jag kan tycka att det är bra att ha enheter med. Samtidigt verkar ingen använda "m" efter höjden. Hellre ensa data enligt vad de flesta gör än att själv avvika :) I stora drag håller jag på att städa en del av mina egna tidigare felaktigheter.
MMN-o (2016-08-08 09:16:59+00:00): Haha, jag vet inte riktigt vad jag skrev och hur jag formulerade mig där. Uppenbarligen hade jag inte vaknat till riktigt.

Min poäng var att man inte behövde göra massändringar utan kunde ha kvar ' m' som suffix men att jag instämde att det var bättre utan (för alla ska borde SI!).

Men nåja, jag ska gå och vakna till lite mer så jag inte mumlar bort mig ännu mer :)