piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
archie (2022-12-06 09:25:16+00:00): Varför lägger du in ett vadställe (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10241908766) när det helt klart framgår att det är en vägtrumma där?

Varför taggar du om allt till "unclassified"? De som taggade före dig måste varit sanna idioter att de taggade så pass fel, eller hur?

Varför ritar du allt in med en offset?
Malin88 PostNord (2022-12-06 10:02:30+00:00): Hej!
Jag missade det, nu har jag ändrat till bro. Blev det rätt?
Jag ändrade till mindre väg för att det ser ut att stämma. Hur tycker du att jag ska göra på dom vägarna?

Jag vet inte vad en offset är. Är det någon inställning jag måste ändra?
archie (2022-12-06 10:20:14+00:00): Imageray offset är när du ritar med en satellitbild i bakgrunden som inte har justerats INNAN inritningen av objekt sker. Då hamnar - i det här fallet vägarna - allt på fel ställe, dvs offset, några meter vid sidan av där vägen i verkligheten går. Detta är grundläggande, innan man vet det och hur man justerar bör man inte editera, för allt hamnar på fel ställe. För en geografisk databas som osm är det minst sagt inte bra att objekten ligger i databasen med fel läge. Håller du med om detta?
Malin88 PostNord (2022-12-06 10:43:16+00:00): Jaha, ja det har jag koll på, vi använder trafikverkets vägnätverk och anpassar kartan efter det, jag visste inte att det hette "offset" när man inte flyttat kartan. Jag kollade aldrig det när jag bara bytte namn på vägen i det här fallet, men nu har jag flyttat vägen efter trafikverkets vägnätverk.
adiatmad (2022-12-06 11:59:42+00:00): Good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=Guest_House (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1119797960). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:39:41+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:39:53+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
user2137papież (2022-12-06 13:23:53+00:00): Bardzo dobra zmiana, jakiś czas temu to implementowałem ale to zdjęli. Dla mnie to miało sens od zawsze akurat.
maraf24 (2022-12-06 20:33:21+00:00): Wycofane.
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:40:00+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:40:06+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:40:12+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
emersonveenstra (2022-12-06 12:54:12+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119799831 and the "buildings" next to it are not buildings, they are boxes. You also placed them directly on top of a road, which should have given you a clue that they are not buildings. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119799836 is not a building, it's a concrete pad. there is also a road going through the middle of it.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119799848 and the two "buildings" next to it are not buildings, they are vehicles.
eggie (2022-12-06 10:02:26+00:00): Helaas...

Gebruik deze tool .. Vul in het schema de tijden in.. Beetje schuiven.. 
en dan zie je bovenin het resultaat. Dat 'copy/past' je achter opening_hours.
 

openingsuren-tool 
 
http://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ 

Hoe je ook niet na te denken of iets de correcte format heeft.
Gr eggie
LopersLos (2022-12-13 13:14:09+00:00): Inmiddels al vaak gebruikt. Ideaal inderdaad.
archie (2022-12-06 09:34:23+00:00): Varför har du taggat om denna väg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/175077440) till "unclassified"? Jag vet att det är en allmän order från PostNord att göra om så mycket som möligt till unclassified, men varför just denna jordbruksväg?
Malin88 PostNord (2022-12-06 09:52:54+00:00): Hej!
Jag tyckte att det såg ut som en mindre väg hela vägen, men nu har jag ändrat så att det är mindre väg fram till huset och därefter jordbuksväg. Blev det bra?
archie (2022-12-06 10:15:30+00:00): Varför delar du upp vägen? Det brukar PostNordare göra. Men varför? Så att det passar bättre ihop med PostNords system, som vi hört tidigare?
Malin88 PostNord (2022-12-06 10:19:43+00:00): Ja, det är av den anledningen.
pangoSE (2022-12-08 05:21:08+00:00): 😬
maraf24 (2022-12-06 20:45:43+00:00): Wycofane.
voltairovicz (2022-12-06 22:24:33+00:00): Ja akurat się zgadzam. Aby nawigacja premiowała trasowanie jest to zasadne, poza tym faktycznie te drogi straciły na znaczeniu, drogi między domami czy bez chodników nie powinny mieć takie samej kategorii jak trasa o ograniczonej dostępnosci w terenie, który zabudowany nie jest. Otwarcie nowej drogi powoduje, że dotychczasowe obciążone ulice mogą pójść w kierunku lokalności
voltairovicz (2022-12-06 22:26:19+00:00): Mma na myśli oczywiscie przejscie z tertiary na unclassified dla Wroclawskiej, Zernickiej, Lipowej. Bo jesli chodzi o primary dla strzellnskiej to za wysoko
maraf24 (2022-12-06 23:07:28+00:00): Do chyba komentarze nie do tego zestawu zmian.
Nie ma żadnego uzasadnienia dla highway=residential dla dróg łączących miejscowości.
user2137papież (2022-12-07 10:37:13+00:00): Unclasiffed na Wspólną i Wrocławską
na zamkniętą ze względu na obwodnicę residental.
voltairovicz (2022-12-07 12:58:43+00:00): Revertów było kilka, nie wiem, który tyczył dokładnie których dróg. Ale właśnie miałem na myśli unclassified dla dwóch ulic równoległych do tego odcinka otwartej obwodnicy
maraf24 (2022-12-07 14:17:04+00:00): Tylko droga przez Biestrzyków zasluguje na zmianę na unclassified, ale dopiero po uruchomieniu Żernickiej.
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:40:18+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:40:24+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
SomeoneElse (2023-03-21 12:44:30+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
Another user has restored it, but it looks like you accidentally removed a tag from https://osm.mapki.com/history/relation/3899605 in this changeset.
If you've got any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy.
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:40:30+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:40:37+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:40:44+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:40:49+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:40:57+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:41:03+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
emersonveenstra (2022-12-06 13:00:09+00:00): Looks good to me, thanks for your contribution!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129774518
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:41:09+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:41:16+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
ualios (2022-12-11 17:00:57+00:00): Invertire senso unico:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119804975
L'altro accesso in uscita dalla rotatoria dovrebbe essere secondary e non secondary_link e avere stesso nome Via Borghi.
La rotatoria se non ha nome specifico meglio non taggarlo. Ciao
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 10:26:32+00:00): Witaj, poprosiliście o weryfikacje.
Nie dodawaj tej samej informacji dwukrotnie (mowa o nazwie na budynku oraz na punkcie). Lokal oznaczamy jako budynek gdy zajmuje całość, lub jako punkt gdy dokładny obszar jest nieznany lub gdy w budynku jest kilka lokali usługowych. Dodanie tego samego na budynku i na punkcie jest błędem (duplikacja danych). Należy punkt usunąć (jest on mniej dokładną informacją od obszaru).

Dodatkowo, na budynku brakuje tagów pizzeri. Najłatwiej to naprawić zaznaczając budynek i wyszukując odpowiednią opcję: https://i.imgur.com/nQX1lDe.png.

Pozdrawiam!
adiatmad (2022-12-06 11:58:32+00:00): Good work on your edits! However, it would be preferable to avoid adding a generic name, such as name=Store (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/1119805439). You might want to take a look at this page (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions). Happy mapping!
mavl (2023-04-25 09:02:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:01:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
mavl (2023-04-25 09:06:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 135307362, 135331978, 135327734, 135318197, 135323168 where the changeset comment is: Hi all. The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: valid data are deleted - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7056].
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-06 18:59:52+00:00): Just a test?

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
AndersAndersson (2022-12-06 21:43:41+00:00): Denna ändring har återställts.
Det fanns en väg där innan som du tog bort.
Som påpekats många gånger är detta inte er privata karta där ni kan rita vägar som passar er utan koppling till verkligheten eller hänsyn till alla andra användare och redigerare av OSM.

Ni på PostNord är nu bannade från att redigera OSM på grund av era bristfälliga redigeringar och er totala ignorans att ta hänsyn till andra och följa de regler som finns.
Ni är välkomna igen när ni lärt er något om ödmjukhet och inte klampar in och kapar projektet på det sätt ni gjort. En vilja att lära och att följa de regler som miljontals andra användare klarar av att följa och att svara på kommentarer är också en nödvändighet.
Bienson (2022-12-06 20:26:57+00:00): Telefonnummern müssen im internationalen Format mit führender +49 für DE eingetragen werden.
Supaplex (2024-10-04 04:41:24+00:00): Please use meaningful changeset comment

FYR: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Vinber-Pro (2025-08-27 16:36:27+00:00): Bonjour,
vous avez créé un POI en dehors de tout batiment, surprenant non ?

Vous vous renseignez pour savoir où il se trouve ?

bonne carto
votre_solution_de_visibilite_digitale_locale (2025-08-28 09:31:59+00:00): Bonjour, 
merci de votre remontée, 
Effectivement c'est une erreur de localisation. Désolé pour cela, Je viens de le corriger. 
Et pour répondre à la question oui nous positionnons le node après vérification de la géolocalisation en général. Bonne journée.
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 10:30:46+00:00): Witaj,
Ten obszar powinien zostać oznaczony jako street-side parking a nie parking. Przez zwykły parking rozumiemy plac parkingowy który znajduje się np. przy większych sklepach albo galeriach handlowych. Parking przyuliczny jest po prostu street-side parking. Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 10:31:21+00:00): Np. tutaj oznaczyłeś dobrze plac parkingowy: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119809204
LockOnGuy (2022-12-07 08:02:07+00:00): Hello Elhamn1992, Please use good changeset comments so mappers can understand and know what is your changeset. Regards.    
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 10:28:52+00:00): Witaj,
Nie używamy name= do "nazw opisowych". Nazwanie parku parkiem jest błędem.

Mowa o:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1119810609

Więcej informacji:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Pozdrawiam!
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 10:29:39+00:00): Można wywnioskować że jest to park  z umieszczonych na nim tagów (leisure=park). I takie coś automatycznie przetłumaczy się na wiele języków w aplikacjach klienckich, gdzie name= nie zostanie automatycznie przetłumaczone.
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 10:33:02+00:00): Np. nazwa to nazwa sklepu albo ulicy, ale nazwą nie jest już np "drzewo" albo "droga leśna".
zluuzki (2022-12-06 16:35:10+00:00): Hello, thank you for your landuse mapping!
However, please don't 'glue' landuses to pipelines or other unrelated features (like https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?#map=22/29.63747/-95.32955) - this unnecessarily complicates editing.
Thanks!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-12-31 02:04:46+00:00): fake mapping
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 10:27:36+00:00): Witaj, jeśli "w budynku" (całym) to lepszą opcją byłoby oznaczenie budynku ajeżeli punktu na nim. Pozdrawiam!
MrMoehritz (2023-03-05 19:26:43+00:00): Dear FinlayClark,

Thank you for contributing to HOT. You requested a review for this changeset. Unfortunately it covers a large area, which makes it hard to review (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets). Please save your changes, before you move to a new location.


Regarding your edits, some of your buildings are not rectangular. If they are rectancular in reality, have a look at https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/ how to map them.

Some of your buildings have been deleted in the meantime. This can have different causes. One could be that they were not well mapped. Feel free to ask the person who deleted them for feedback (e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132290589).

Happy mapping

Mo
CAM-Gerlach_Repair (2026-06-16 07:01:47+00:00): Cleaned up remaining SEO spam and other tagging for POI in changeset 184166881

https://osm.org/changeset/184166881
eggie (2022-12-06 21:32:34+00:00): Dag Diederick. Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke zo.
Groet eggie
Diederick22 (2022-12-07 15:22:52+00:00): Oke dankjewel :)
GEO ECLA (2023-01-13 14:43:03+00:00): Un pylône d'une ligne électrique avait été déplacé par erreur.
Voir : https://osmcha.org/changesets/129776800
Corrigé par : https://osmcha.org/changesets/131232726/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129776800
archie (2022-12-06 10:56:48+00:00): Tummen upp!
archie (2022-12-06 11:01:02+00:00): Snyggt!
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 11:25:48+00:00): Hi, you didn't add tags which specify what kind of POI it is. To me it looks like https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dguest_house. I already corrected it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129779068 Cheers!
ivanbranco (2022-12-08 09:54:36+00:00): Ciao ross-map,

hai aggiunto il ref:msal a questa farmacia ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2094692758 ), sembrerebbe giustamente, perché il ministero della salute dice che la farmacia con quel codice ha indirizzo "Via Accursio Miraglia, 28", però la stessa farmacia è mappata anche qua con lo stesso ref:msal: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2094692751

Tu hai conoscenza locale? Riusciresti a verificare?

Grazie
Đuro Jiří (2022-12-06 11:13:43+00:00): * migliorato monumento, policia e aggiunto fontanella, fontana e edifici
JasmineRanasinghe (2022-12-22 12:15:19+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/National_Trust_Paths
Samokat (2022-12-10 11:39:09+00:00): * с Яндекс.Панорама, сьемкой улиц и со спутника.
andyonthewings (2022-12-06 12:15:10+00:00): This doesn't sound like a real name.
archie (2022-12-06 11:50:35+00:00): underbar kommentar!
nevw (2022-12-07 23:17:20+00:00): Hi this changeset has also been reverted due to damage by new mapper around HMAS Albatross
Warin61 (2022-12-07 23:25:59+00:00): Thanks nev. It moved a fence across the taxi ways... as well as reducing the base area.
pitscheplatsch (2022-12-06 19:13:40+00:00): Hi.

Could you use the comment field of your created changeset for describing your map edits? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Thanks.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
henkvanderspek (2022-12-07 10:01:54+00:00): I added the number of seats and that is has a back support. OSM GO has no option for these comments.
abakus_uploader (2022-12-06 23:35:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
NorthCrab (2022-12-06 11:35:15+00:00): Hi, why the construction=house tag? Since you change building=construction to building=house, the construction=house alone has no use. It should be removed completely (if construction was finished - otherwise building=construction + construction=house is a proper combination).
marcinbojko (2022-12-06 12:02:26+00:00): Thanks, It's an artifact - really don't know why it was there. Removed
nevw (2022-12-06 21:31:13+00:00): Why have you tagged HMAS Albatross as a park instead of a military airfield area?
Warin61 (2022-12-07 23:07:44+00:00): Reverted. 
Hi,
Welcome to OSM. Unfortunately this and your next changeset broke the boundary for HMAS Albatross and so were reverted.
Warin61 (2022-12-07 23:07:53+00:00): Reverted.
Discostu36 (2022-12-07 14:45:17+00:00): Es gibt nur einen Lenauweg in Darmstadt. Welchen Sinn hat es, hier addr:suburb hinzuzufügen?
spiregrain (2022-12-06 14:53:30+00:00): Your 10,000th edit!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129779299
rskedgell (2022-12-06 17:01:48+00:00): I realised it was close to 10,000 changesets last weeks and made sure that #10000 was one which I could explain to non-mapping friends when I post about it on social media later, rather than a batch of UPRNs or USRNs :-)
spiregrain (2022-12-06 17:30:36+00:00): Always good to see reference numbers being added!  I'm a fiend for postcodes and FHRS codes myself.   

But congrats!
Joseph R P (2023-06-13 00:25:32+00:00): Why did you extract the tags from buildings to points in this edit?
Warin61 (2022-12-07 23:31:48+00:00): Hi,
These new 'roads' don't make sense! They appear to be boundaries between properties. 

You are attracting attention. Please explain these new 'roads'.
CloCkWeRX (2022-12-10 07:31:12+00:00): Tone it down a bit - new mapper trying to add driveways doesn't warrant this kind of hostility.

@TheSandMan6 You might want to model these as a 'driveway' or 'service' road. Alternatively, if it's more of a walking path; you can model these differently.

Please double check against the imagery carefully - there's a few of these that seem to go through where a building is.
Warin61 (2022-12-10 07:59:33+00:00): The Maxar imagery looks to be the most upto date. The DCS Base Map shows the legal boundaries. 

Tracks made by construction work should not be mapped - they will go away with occupancy and landscaping, so they are not 'permanent'. 

Unfortunately the past edits have not been good. Better to start smaller like this edit and see how you go. Maybe map the houses?
nevw (2022-12-10 13:18:14+00:00): Esri seems to be the most recent imagery. 
I agree with Warin61 that it would be best to just map the buildings here and maybe leave the roads unmapped until a local survey or later satellite data becomes available.
emersonveenstra (2022-12-06 12:45:20+00:00): once again, you are saying things are buildings when they are not. Please go through all of your recent changesets and fix your mistakes. Use more than one unique aerial imagery and ensure that you are mapping and tagging correctly
emersonveenstra (2022-12-06 12:42:43+00:00): I'm reverting this changeset, none of these are buildings, they are trucks. Please use more than one unique aerial imagery source when you edit.
emersonveenstra (2022-12-06 12:44:10+00:00): reverted in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/129782313
NorthCrab (2022-12-20 22:11:06+00:00): Witaj, ale on już jest oznaczony - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/291525913/history. Usunąłem duplikat. Pozdrawiam!
NunoCapeloCaldeira (2023-01-01 20:05:30+00:00): vandal, fictional data
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/129780166
woodpeck_repair (2023-01-01 20:14:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 130762437 where the changeset comment is: reverting edits by touchgrassstudio which were not in line with reality
Rom1 (2022-12-15 15:25:30+00:00): Bonjour Nick, tu as ajouté une antenne https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10242215512 proche de cette autre https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9839810590, y-a-t-il bien deux antennes ? Merci.
Nick Parker (2022-12-15 17:20:52+00:00): Il y bien deux antennes. La deuxième a été construite très récemment.
BCNorwich (2022-12-07 07:44:42+00:00): Hi, It looks like your recent mapping has unfortunately resulted in lots of self-intersection/duplication of sections of highways, also duplicated nodes. Please see the problems here:- https://tinyurl.com/bdes65vp

Could you please have a look and remedy the problems as soon as possible as routing could be disrupted? Need any help please just ask.

Regards Bernard.
luxiaghd (2022-12-07 16:32:42+00:00): Hi Bernard,
Thank you for spotting these errors, it really helps us to better conflate future assets! I've already reverted this whole changeset by changeset#129828638.
gurglypipe (2022-12-06 12:11:11+00:00): Hi, I’m not sure this is a useful change. From spot-checking a few of them, the ref is already tagged separately on these relations, and the country can be determined by spatial data.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

What was your reasoning for adding descriptive names to these relations?

Thanks
Paul Berry (2022-12-06 12:45:06+00:00): A great many have already been tagged in this way over the years by various authors. Just bringing the tags up to the same consistency.
Paul Berry (2022-12-06 12:47:57+00:00): If they add nothing, I'm happy to remove them.
gurglypipe (2022-12-06 12:48:23+00:00): But what value does it add to the map?
gurglypipe (2022-12-06 12:49:24+00:00): I think I replied before seeing your latest reply. Yeah, from my point of view I don’t think they (or the similar names on other relations) add anything to the map that isn’t already given by the ref= tag. 🤷
Paul Berry (2022-12-06 12:54:52+00:00): I'll remove them then. If there's an actual name that describes the whole road (eg Great North Road), I'll put that in its place. Probably most of them will go.
gurglypipe (2022-12-06 15:20:43+00:00): That sounds like it would be a good improvement to the map, thanks for taking the time to do so :)
Max-Kritic (2022-12-23 18:20:43+00:00): La prison InSERRE  n'est pas encore en construction ! Tu vas trop vite.
benoitdd (2022-12-23 18:54:29+00:00): Oui, j'aurais dû le mettre en "proposed". Mais ça peut faciliter les accès aux chantiers de les avoir un peu en avance.
Max-Kritic (2022-12-24 11:36:09+00:00): Pour l'instant, le bureau d'architectes n'est pas encore connu.