piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
martien-176 (2022-04-08 16:12:52+00:00): Hi, welcome to HOT. I am a validator and noticed these buildings you mapped. You traced it quite well. However there are a few issues. You mapped this group of buildings as one building. Zooming in it is more likely that they should be mapped as 3 separate buildings. Also the building that touches the other building shares a node. Please avoid letting buildings share nodes with neighboring features (buildings, but also roads or waterways). And always pay good attention to the squaring of your buildings. Please watch these 2 short video for more info: 
-Buildings--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o
-Roads--> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBLwb2nisJQ 

Thanks so much for your contribution, Martien, HOT validator. Please keep mapping.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119470941
jeslop (2022-04-11 14:40:49+00:00): Hola Ander. Bienvenido a OSM.

¿Qué es este nodo que has añadido, únicamente con el nombre como etiqueta? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9651782770

La información está incompleta así. Además, ¿seguro que ese es el nombre y no una referencia?

Saludos

Jesús López
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
jeslop (2022-05-04 11:00:36+00:00): Elimino el nodo dado que no has respondido ni lo has modificado.

Saludos
KatGaea (2022-04-08 13:17:12+00:00): Sorry I misnamed this one, it was not intended
user_5359 (2022-04-09 16:31:11+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/705756976. Did you mean website:refugee:ua instead of website:refugee:uk ? 
there are also more than 500 website:ua in use.
NieWnen (2022-04-10 11:07:19+00:00): That's not what I meant, but we (helpua_osmp action) didn't have specific 1 tag for tagging Polish websites with Ukrainian language  sub-sites, but now we do and it's "website:ua".
I fixed my edits.
user_5359 (2022-04-10 11:10:52+00:00): Did you need help (see taginfo)?
NieWnen (2022-04-10 11:15:49+00:00): No, it has been already changed and rest of them will be changed too.
zvenzzon (2022-04-09 15:17:37+00:00): Hej! 

Thanks for your contributions to the map and welcome to Openstreetmap!

Please consider writing more useful changeset comments. Good changeset comments is a good help for other mappers. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

With regards
zvenzzon
Vinber (2022-04-10 16:08:41+00:00): Bonjour Enora, Léa, Le Goose et Dorian,

à priori vous avez eu cours de SNT, pouvez vous faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le guide de bonnes pratiques lors des contributions à OSM svp :  https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/bonnes-pratiques-osm-en-snt

Et pour vos commentaires, je vous laisse aller voir ce document https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications

Bonne journée
MxxCon (2022-04-09 03:07:03+00:00): Hello.
A couple of questions regarding this edit.
What's the point of mapping a generic landuse=residential if actual buildings and streets are already mapped?

You mapped PS98 as school grounds, while it's already mapped as school building. That goes against "one feature, one OSM element" principle as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element
And finally you mapped these areas by extending and gluing them to nearby roads. Generally it's better to map areas exactly to their boundaries/property lines and not unnecessarily attaching them to roads since doing that makes editing things needlessly fiddly.
👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119472341
FlowerHillPerson (2022-04-09 03:38:28+00:00): Hello,

I know what you mean and have been trying to disconnect them if I see them connected (and when I made these edits, I had roads switched off); I thought I disconnected them but maybe I missed a couple, and I will go through and fix them. 

I honestly completely forgot about one feature, 1 OSM element; I will fix that with the school, as well. 

In my opinion, showing a land use is very important – even if buildings are mapped; how would one know what the land use is when viewing just by looking at a generic gray square representing a building? There is no harm in having a land use area rendered, as far as I see it – and I honestly see it as adding value to a map. It helps a viewer to have a better understanding of the area – especially when you have a street grid where, on a map, retail/commercial/industrial and residential areas appear the same.

Again, I appreciate you reminding me about 1 feature, 1 OSM element; I will make that fix now and remember it going forward.

I hope this clears everything up.

Thank you, and have a good evening.
FlowerHillPerson (2022-04-09 03:45:35+00:00): Just a follow-up: I have just fixed P. S. 98. Apologies again.

Thanks,
FHP
Mikroskop (2022-04-10 18:40:09+00:00): nochmal überprüfen
Ekaterina Butskevich (2022-04-19 13:49:53+00:00): Hi! My name is Ekaterina and I work on improving OpenStreetMap data by fixing errors and adding data for Mapbox.
Tell me please is the road that you have plotted really here? It is not visible on satellite images. 

With best wishes!
Dartmouthmapmaker (2022-04-19 18:06:35+00:00): The road is from  open Data of the  Halifax Regional Municipality as stated in the source
Ekaterina Butskevich (2022-05-16 08:28:10+00:00): Thank you very much!
aceman444 (2022-04-10 11:13:47+00:00): Aha, uz ani popisy sad zmien neviete poriadne napisat? Co ste tu akoze zmenili? Preco tie nahodne zmeny kaplniek na wayside_shrine? Boli ste tam? Ako viete ich obrysy ked su pod stromami?

Co ta cesta https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1050286089 ? Bez kvality, na Ortofotomozaike ani nie je vidiet, zato ze tam ludia slapu (ak ste to obkreslili podla Strava) este tam nemusi byt cesta. Tam sa da chodit hocijako po poli.

Zase ste neuviedli ziadny zdroj.
kartonage (2022-04-08 14:24:22+00:00): Hej und willkommen zu OpenStreetMap,

gibt es hier eine brandneue Regelung, dass durchgehen nur noch 30 erlaubt ist? Seit langem sind hier nämlich nur Mo-Fr 06:00-18:00 30 erlaubt gewesen und vor kurzem standen die Schilder noch entsprechend mit dieser Einschränkung. Entsprechend ist es auch eingetragen gewesen.

Beste Grüße
ArminShrek (2022-04-08 14:58:34+00:00): Hej kartonage,
danke für den freundlichen Willkommensgruß!
Ich bin gestern gegen 15:00 mit meiner ZOE und der Routing-APP abetterroutplaner ABRP dort entlang gefahren und habe festgestellt, dass im südlichen Teil bis zur Lessingbrücke in der App 50 angezeigt wurde - was mich gewundert hatte. Dann habe ich den link in ABRP zur Korrektur in OSM gesehen und das entsprechend eingetragen. Hinter der Brücke hat es ja mit 30 bereits gestimmt. Ich meine auch gesehen zu haben, dass es keine zeitliche Einschränkung für die 30 direkt nach der Ampel Lessingstr. gegeben hat. 
Ich werde das demnächst noch einmal kontrollieren. Sollte ich meinen Eintrag vlt. so lange zurücknehmen? 
Danke für den Hinweis und beste Grüße
Armin
kartonage (2022-04-09 08:39:25+00:00): Verstehe. Von ABRP habe ich jetzt zum ersten Mal gehört, aber sieht interessant aus. Eventuell könnte der Fehler auch bei denen legen, wenn sie solche "conditionals" wie wir sie hier nennen nicht korrekt auswerten. 
Das ist aber leider manchmal nicht ganz so nachvollziehbar bis es dann jemand bemerkt.

Ich bin mir ziemlich sicher, dass die Mo-Fr-Zeit für den Abschnitt bei den Schulen hier noch so existiert und sonst tatsächlich 50 ist.

Ansonsten kannst du dich gern auch so mal umgucken. Im Wiki gibt es viele Dinge zu entdecken und vielleicht hast du ja Lust hier und da was auszubessern. 
Wenn du zwischendurch Fragen hast, kannst du dich gerne in unserer Matrix- und Telegram-Gruppe melden.
Links zu beiden findest du unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Berlin -> "Kontakt zur Community".

Beste Grüße
Kevin
maraf24 (2022-04-08 19:54:06+00:00): Brak źródeł, poza tym takie zmiany zajmują czas.
eggie (2022-04-09 11:23:55+00:00): Ha Liam,

Je vraagt feedback.. In een changeset hierna heb je het al verbeterd.
Inderdaad .. het zijn vlakken natural=water

Zorg wel dat de landuse niet overlapt en het water netjes aansluit aan de landuse. Dus de nodes verbinden.
Zelf denk ik dat Vespucci daar ongeschikt voor is. Mijn advies zou zijn om josm te gebruiken.
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119473066
Mapse
eggie
limes11 (2022-04-08 20:50:20+00:00): revertiert
rowcherryrow (2022-04-08 14:24:29+00:00): Correction: Comment should have been "Extended a road, reclassified a road to service, and added a barrier=gate tag near the Gare Routière de l'Entre-Deux #adt", Sources used was Maxar SecureWatch Imagery 2022-03-02; Mapillary
limes11 (2022-04-08 20:50:46+00:00): revertiert - Kahlflächen viel größer, siehe NRW Orthophotos
user_5359 (2022-04-09 16:35:34+00:00): Hello! Please notice your typo: bicycle:onway instead of bicycle:oneway (I will correct this)
Christopher (2022-04-09 18:50:57+00:00): Hallo,

Danke für den Hinweis und die Korrektur, ist ein vertipper. Passiert halt, wir haben uns ja Dienstag in der Verkehrswende Gruppe getroffen, daher auf deutsch.

Christopher
user_5359 (2022-04-09 18:59:39+00:00): Übrigens scheint jetzt oneway:bicycle üblicher zu sein 
bicycle:oneway (1) zu oneway:bicycle (>193T)
Herman Lee (2022-09-03 03:16:50+00:00): “君子布公交首末站”等节点应换为platform而不是使用bus_station
MxxCon (2022-04-09 03:14:13+00:00): Hello.
Instead of outright deleting this node, it's best to use lifecycle prefixes as documented in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix
If you don't want to do that, you can at least just downgrade this node into address node by right-clicking on it.
Doing that not only preserves address information, but also history of this node so that it could be referred to in the future.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119474360
user_5359 (2022-04-08 19:27:20+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9651953396. What is the meaning of the key author?
user_5359 (2022-04-09 06:31:02+00:00): Did you mean artist instead of author?
Francoerbi41 (2022-04-09 07:10:24+00:00): Yes, of course.
marczoutendijk (2022-04-08 15:00:01+00:00): This should be east of Tomelloso!
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-08 22:39:30+00:00): Porque removeu a via interna que iniciava aqui: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9652869296 ?
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-11 11:52:59+00:00): Por favor, responda pra eu não precisar reverter toda a sua edição.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-05-01 20:50:26+00:00): Aqui você não respondeu também.
lann (2022-04-22 05:17:47+00:00): Bonjour

Vous êtes sur qu'il y a un giratoire sur un chemin ?
J'en doute
Markus Delbrouck (2022-04-08 16:53:05+00:00): Adresse Unterspeck vor Hausnummer 8 wurde der Abstand zur Strasse vergrössert. Der neue Vorplatz ist Privatgelände. Die Korrektur des Strassenverlauf wurde schon eingepflegt. Danke.
rohieb (2025-12-06 20:22:19+00:00): Leider hast du den Hinweis nicht verlinkt, um den es hier ging, und wenn sie mal geschlossen sind, findet man sie ja leider nicht mehr auf der Karte wieder. Aber vllt kannst du bei dem neuen Hinweis was beisteuern? https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/5077288
ibanez (2025-12-07 13:35:02+00:00): Doch der Hinweis steht doch im Changeset unter closed:note=2996969
siehe auch https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2996969#map=15/52.26354/10.52142&layers=N
rohieb (2025-12-07 19:14:32+00:00): Ah danke, das habe ich übersehen!
Carto'Cité (2022-07-05 16:45:58+00:00): Bonjour Thomas,
Merci pour le dédoublonnage sur cette piste (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/284231622). Pour éviter que l'objet ne ressorte dans StreetComplete comme c'était le cas à l'origine de ce doublon (et de nombreux autres), j'ajoute une cycleway:left/right/both=separate. Cette pratique fonctionne plutôt bien et valide bien le fait que l'aménagement est décrit ; n'hésite pas si tu as des remarques.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Leo Slager (2022-04-08 23:04:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:21:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-09 16:57:25+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1050310672. What is the meaning of the tag 5 = 5.5?
vojtechzaboril (2022-04-10 15:27:26+00:00): Yep, its just a mistake. I deleted the tag. Thanks a lot.
V
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Supaplex (2022-04-11 02:10:28+00:00): 您好：

OpenStreetMap是群眾參與的共編地圖計劃，如果仍然是存在的事物，應當是修改現有的以符合比較精確的狀況，而非刪除用新的取代掉，也方便回饋過往的編輯歷史。
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119476554
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:17:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Dimitar155 (2022-04-18 16:52:58+00:00): Hello Red_Ranger,

This road segment is not one way. There are cars which are going in the opposite direction on Maxar Imagery. I've changed the oneway tag.

Best regards,
Dimitar
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
maraf24 (2022-04-08 16:18:37+00:00): Z jakiego powodu zmieniłeś kategorię drogi?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-09 16:14:06+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on 
What is the meaning of the tag
currency:$100 = yes
currency:$200 = yes
currency:$50 = yes
currency:$500 = yes
currency:billetes = yes
Please notice the difference between currency, fee, payment.

If you mean the accepted notes for cash_in: Please have a look on https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=payment%3Anotes%3A
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:11:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:09+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
legofahrrad (2022-04-08 22:53:05+00:00): Hallo,
hier wurden mit deinem Änderungssatz die Öffnungszeiten "aktualisiert". Du hast allerdings nur das "Su,PH off" entfernt. Das würde bedeuten, dass Aldi hier auch an Feiertagen geöffnet hätte.
Vielleicht kannst du nochmal erklären, was du hier genau getan hast und was du bezwecken wolltest. ;)
Viele Grüße – und bei Fragen immer gerne melden!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 23:00:02+00:00): how is NRCan Not license-compatible, please revert to previous version as it is it is using Canadian Open Government Licence which has been approved as compatible with ODbL by the Licence Working Group (LWG).
SomeoneElse (2022-04-15 23:12:22+00:00): You have been asked numerous times about the sources that you have used: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/PopeyePopcord/blocks and gave evasive non-answers like on https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119735027 .  In the absence of any sensible reply (and especially as this was the second time we have been round this merry-go-round) there was no alternative to a revert,
puchaczowsky (2022-04-08 21:11:19+00:00): jaki jest powód zmiany kategorii tej drogi?
Temat-Droga (2022-04-09 05:53:31+00:00): Droga jest bardzo wąska, porównywalna do ulic na Karłowicach. (przykładowo Samuela Lindego)
Patchanka (2022-04-08 17:52:19+00:00): merci pour la correction ;-)
Rond point un peu daté en effet
pyrog (2022-04-08 17:26:31+00:00): Salut Pierre,

Pas besoin de mettre JOSM dans les commentaires de changeset, l'éditeur est indiqué automatiquement dans un tag dédié.

Par contre tu peux indiquer que tu édites des chemins.

Je vois aussi que tu as mis "OpenStreetMap Carto (Standard)" ou peut-être que tu as laissé JOSM le mettre automatiquement.

OSM n'est pas une source pour OSM ;)

Bonne continuation avec JOSM.
Les débuts sont difficiles mais c'est un bon investissement.

A+
Yves
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119477797
mapper377 (2022-04-10 23:57:07+00:00): The hamlet of Shackleton is in Highland County, OH, not Hamilton County, OH. However the substation has the correct addr:county tag.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:12:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Sylvain M (2022-05-12 14:20:39+00:00): Attention, tu as cassé la relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12771761 à l'occasion de ce changeset et des suivants.
Merci à toi si tu arrives à reconstituer la relation.
N'hésites pas si tu as besoin de conseils.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
VlIvYur (2022-04-11 21:07:30+00:00): But it has been
TrickyFoxy (2022-04-11 21:21:40+00:00): :) Напишу разработчику форка https://github.com/Helium314/StreetComplete, чтобы поправил описания пакетов правок для своих квестов
Kovoschiz (2022-04-09 07:15:02+00:00): Why are you deleting all these?
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-05-03 18:49:48+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/517112927/history - that is shop selling cars, right?