piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2021-10-15 22:33:03+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
chlenix (2021-10-15 12:40:13+00:00): а как там люди заезжают во дворы?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112538376
Frans S (2021-10-15 11:47:56+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
Pay attention to map accurate. You oversize some buildings here.
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112538609
eggie (2021-10-15 11:32:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback: Er zijn nogal wat regeltjes in OSM hoe te taggen. Adresnodes worden geïmporteerd vanuit het Kadaster, name=Tibsterwei 163c
is helaas niet corect.
Wat is je bedoeling. Staat hier een woning? 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-15 11:38:31+00:00): Dit adres bestaat niet. Ik zal je toevoeging verwijderen.
Wanneer je nog vragen hebt stel ze gerust.  Wat is je bedoeling?

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:12:45+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Hits and tips issue C and E


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112538776
Frans S (2021-10-15 11:44:24+00:00): Thank you for mapping.
We welcome you as a new mapper.
 You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 
A few remarks.
Map buildings individually. Don'include the yard.
Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112538780
Nordpfeil (2021-10-16 10:35:30+00:00): Looks like Copy & Paste error, please have a look
Lokai (2021-10-17 05:42:26+00:00): Welchen genau?
Nordpfeil (2021-10-17 06:52:49+00:00): Es war ein Text, der auf mehrere Key=value aufgeteilt war. Kann jetzt aber nicht sagen, an welchem Knoten oder way das war.  "https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm" zeigt es jetzt auch nicht mehr an.
eggie (2021-10-15 11:33:52+00:00): Dag Sebas,..  Wat is je bedoeling hier?

MVG
eggie
Frans S (2021-10-15 11:46:37+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
Don't include the yard next to the buildings
Don't collect multiple buildings when you are mapping. 

FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112538941
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:30:18+00:00): Hello. Thanks for this mappings
This are no buildings,  as far as I can judge, they are historical relics
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112538951
Frans S (2021-10-17 10:34:12+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
We welcome you as a new mapper.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A: not accurate mapped
C: collecting multiple buildings in 1 mapping 
E: Buildings not squared.
H: includes yard .
(this comment also applies to your other changesets on this project.)


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112539057
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:16:41+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Hints and tips document
Issues A. E


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112539106
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:33:44+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A and E 
Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112539106
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:10:23+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
Hints and tips.
Point 2.
Buildings point  6. 13 



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112539124
NieWnen (2021-10-16 11:51:53+00:00): Tutaj nie ma ciągu pieszo-rowerowego. Wycofałem.
eggie (2021-10-15 12:54:12+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback... In OSM taggen we bedrijven bij op de bestaande adresnodes. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-10-15 13:02:27+00:00): De naam heb ik verplaatst naar de adresnode...  Is de vorm van het gebouw werkelijk veranderd? Alle gebouwen zijn directe import vanuit het Kadaster en als zodanig ingemeten.
MVG
eggie
Michel Viergever (2021-10-15 13:23:55+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Ja het gebouw is aan beide zijden vergroot. De kassen zijn uitgebreid, de landbouwgrond boven het perseel zijn ook greenhouses. De huizen aan de achterweg (60,62,64 zijn gesloopt. Op die plek en het braakliggende terrein daarboven worden momenteel greenhouses gebouwd, welke volgende maand opgeleverd worden.

mvg Michel
eggie (2021-10-15 13:34:07+00:00): Oke...  tip... gebouwen kun je laten importeren via het forum van osm. Zie welkomstmail-links.. draadje Verzoek BAG import.
Gesloopte panden gewoon verwijderen. 
Succes
Eggie
eggie (2021-10-15 14:49:42+00:00): De huizen aan de Achterweg heb ik verwijderd en de kassen uitgebreid conform de BAG.
Paar keer CTRL F5.. dan zie je wel het effect. 
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-10-15 14:38:09+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
chlenix (2021-10-15 12:43:23+00:00): пожалуйста, не удаляйте объекты, старайтесь изменять геометрию. и используйте смещения для снимка 9.64/8.13
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112540531
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:52:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:55:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A and E on following document. 


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112540654
wielandb (2021-10-17 13:18:28+00:00): Was ist die source für diese Öffnungszeiten bei "50's ville Diner"?

Auf der Website steht es so, wie es vor deiner Änderung war.
shogun (2021-10-17 13:47:25+00:00): https://www.50svillediner.de/

es fehlte die Öffnungszeit für Feiertag und 00:00 Uhr bringt Fehler, richtig ist 24:00 Uhr
Frans S (2021-10-15 13:21:13+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
This is a building only project. If you want to map highways anyhow, tag them as per Highway wiki.
About the mapping of buildings see
A and E of following document.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112540748
chlenix (2021-10-15 12:46:07+00:00): Используйте для слоя Ukraine - Mykolaiv 2018 смещение 9.64,8.13 . Весь город под это смещение проверен. Не работайте по нулевому смещению
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112540814
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Linux Alpes (2021-10-17 06:14:29+00:00): Bonjour,
Pour indiquer que les toilettes sont réservées aux usagers du collège, il faut utiliser la valeur "customers" pour la clé "access".
Bonne journée,
Frans S (2021-10-15 13:24:39+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
E on following list.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112540867
Frans S (2021-10-15 13:11:10+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Please pay attention on these points:
F on following list.
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112540980
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-15 12:58:31+00:00): Actually, several gaps.  Previously https://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeRelation?relationId=165638 said it was in 23 pieces.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse (2021-10-16 13:35:54+00:00): Hello,
The merge of two bits of road either side of the T junction at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/619762800#map=18/50.54113/-4.66787 made the Cornwall AONB not a valid multipolygon any more - I've snipped it off in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/112579279 so it should be OK again now.
Best Regards,
Andy
amurski (2021-10-16 15:13:03+00:00): Hello Andy, thanks so much for fixing that.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:50:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
mueschel (2021-10-16 08:59:36+00:00): Hi,
something went wrong with your last edits - there are many roads with two new tags which don't seem right:

error:circular
source:datetime

Could you check that?
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1c7f
Frans S (2021-10-15 13:01:10+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112541281
Frans S (2021-10-15 12:56:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A and E  on following document

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112541297
DaveF (2021-10-15 15:06:53+00:00): Hi
Welcome to OSM
FYI
landuse=grass in not required. It is for specific areas as indicated in the wikipage's first sentence:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dgrass

The landuse of golf features is 'golf' not grass.
To distinguish any differences the 'surface' tag should be used.

golf=* are a specific sport subset of leisure=pitch.
The tag to distinguish it's playing finish is 'surface'
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dpitch

Please don't assume a validator's *suggestion* is valid or correct.

I've flagged it as an error:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/8748#issuecomment-940155347
TSharpe96 (2021-10-15 15:40:39+00:00): Apologies. It was a suggested tag. I have removed.
TSharpe96 (2021-10-15 15:41:10+00:00): Any tips to how the tags for this use should be?
DaveF (2021-10-15 18:50:58+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course

Golf features have recently been included for rendering in OSM-carto which is considered the 'standard' map. They render as if assumed to be all grass, but adding that specific tag is useful, &  should be added as 'surface'.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

Others for golf maybe 'artificial_turf' & matting.

If using iD editor be sure to click the 'ignore' option to avoid it automatically adding it's 'landuse' suggestion.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:02:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Carto'Cité (2021-11-25 09:37:16+00:00): Le remplacement du parc Jardin Marielle (plutôt que sa modification) a amené la perte de tags importants, level, layer, location et wikipedia. Je les ai restaurés.
Antoine de Carto’Cité pour SNCF #Transilien
Shaun das Schaf (2021-10-18 10:33:09+00:00): Hallo Ethoz,

ist der östliche Teil dieses Bachs: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/993042211
wirklich vorhanden?

Außer auf der Maps4BW-Karte kann ich ihn nämlich auf keinem Luftbild erkennen und laut Changeset hast du nur Maps4BW verwendet.

Maps4BW sollte nie als einzige Quelle zum Mappen verwendet werden, da dort sehr oft veraltete oder falsche Daten enthalten sind.

Falls du dir nicht sicher bist, ob dieser Teil des Bachs wirklich existiert, entferne ihn bitte wieder.

Danke und viele Grüße
Shaun das Schaf
Hugoren Martinako (2022-06-12 11:50:57+00:00): Buenas,

Gracias por la contribución de POIs en el centro de la ciudad.
Sólo quería indicarte que tiendes a colocar los nodos en el borde del edificio, y eso solo lo deben cumplir los nodos entrance. Cualquier otro nodo POI lo debes coloccar dentro del edificio, cerca del borde, pero no en él.

El editor iD sugiere (aparece un warning) para que se extraiga el nodo del edificio.

Un saludo
Graeme Herbert (2022-06-16 12:07:17+00:00): Hola, ya llevo unos meses pensando en cambiar esta forma de colocar los locales, y también he visto la advertencia del editor. He empezado a hacerlo hace unos años por sugerencia de otro usuario. No me parecia mala idea en el momento colocar los locales con entrada propia en el borde. Sobre todo para los edificios con varios locales y para distinguir bien cada negocio. Pero también se puede hacer colocando el punto cerca al borde, y no tengo problema en cambiar. Un saludo.
Frans S (2021-10-15 13:14:21+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A and E on following list.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112542181
Frans S (2021-10-15 13:16:26+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not in according to the HOTOSM quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:
A, C , E and F on following list


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
FYI Please view this video about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/112542335
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-03-10 12:58:16+00:00): nessa região tem varias vias incorretamente classificadas como footway