piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
voltairovicz (2022-05-23 15:29:05+00:00): Ja skłaniam się bardziej ku kategorii tertairy. Za pewno padło tutaj wiele argumentów, ale ta droga nie ma wielu spowalniaczy ruchu i stanowi naturalną kontynuację drogi Karola Dickensa, która wraz z drawską tworzy korytarz komunikacyjny między Alejami Jerozolimskimi (gdzie zwłaszcza mamy węzeł) a Grójecką na wysokości Parku Szczęśliwickiego. Jest to trzecia, równoległa oś do Kopińskiej czy też 1920 roku, zatem podwyższyłbym jej standard
jpennycook (2022-05-11 16:59:40+00:00): Hello.

Again, can I ask what the source of your edit is?  Park Lane is now divided by bollards north of Nine Mile Ride Extension.

Jon
jpennycook (2022-05-11 17:06:24+00:00): This road does not exist: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1026367799
JunKwonGD (2022-05-12 09:09:14+00:00): Hi

I received the reference from Wokingham council team. They said a new roundabout and road layout that has now opened which is available on Google Maps - https://www.google.co.uk/maps/@51.3746978,-0.8861668,18.4z

Could you confirm if the reference from Wokingham council and Google Maps is whether correct or not?

Jun
jpennycook (2022-05-14 12:06:19+00:00): Hello.

With OpenStreetMap, you have to be careful to use up-to-date information that isn't subject to copyright ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright - particularly the "Copyright infringement" section and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Copyright_Easter_Eggs ). If OpenStreetMap contains data from disallowed sources, it could be subject to legal action. 

OpenStreetMap is used for all kinds of uses, including journey planning for logistics companies, hence it is important that the information is correct.
When entering data into OSM, you need to enter a proper changeset comment, giving details of your source and what you are trying to achieve. In addition, use the boxes in the "source" section to select or enter sources. 

Examples of acceptable sources (see also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source ):-
• Bing aerial imagery or any imagery visible in iD
• OSMUK Cadastral parcels ( https://osmuk.org/cadastral-parcels/ ) 
• things you have seen yourself or recorded in a GPS trace, including road signs
• things you have seen when using Mapillary or KartaView - both allow and encourage use of their imagery for OSM 

Examples of disallowed sources:-
• Google Maps, StreetView, or Earth
• Council websites 
• Developer websites 
• documents, maps, or plans issued by councils 
• documents, maps, or plans issued by developers 
• Ordnance Survey maps ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey - "OSM takes great care not to taint the database with intellectual property rights belonging to outside parties.") 

If you have used any of the disallowed sources in your previous changesets, you should add a note to each giving your source so they can be remapped using allowed sources. 

Jon
jpennycook (2022-05-14 12:07:54+00:00): If you look at the history of the roads around Nine Mile Ride Extension and Park Lane, you will see that I edited them quite recently based on a survey at the beginning of May - hence how I know that one of the roads you added does not exist.
lovethebomb (2022-05-11 16:42:36+00:00): Exchanged with @eggie and OSM Discord, contacted the BAG to request confirmation of error in the data.

I'll revert my changes for the vertical line from 96 to 100 on the street if BAG invalidates my request.
lovethebomb (2022-05-13 07:40:35+00:00): BAG has invalidated the request, the geometry was correct.
I'll revert these changes.
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:44:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
woodpeck_repair (2022-05-28 12:47:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 121614336 where the changeset comment is: remove undiscussed and buggy import of copyrighted camping site data
user_14547832 (2022-07-04 02:19:37+00:00): The reason why I used the KML is because this unknown neighborhood is partially visible in Bing's Imagery.
Osmwithspace (2023-03-20 21:22:15+00:00): Es wäre schön, wenn du deine Changesets etwas kleiner halten würdest. Dann ist das übersichtlicher und besser nachvollziebar. Du hattest ja um Überprüfung gebeten. Was genau soll denn nochmal angeschaut werden?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120850644
csimeona22 (2022-05-11 17:12:13+00:00): Source was Maxar Premium Imagery
mariotomo (2022-05-11 20:39:31+00:00): hi. you're not a total beginner, you probably are aware of "Good Comments", meant to help reviewers.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
(also the changeset size is rather against the best practices: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)
(above comments before looking at the changes.)
Lejun (2022-05-12 09:45:02+00:00): Ok pour moi. Si on veut aller plus dans le détail, quitte à faire la recherche sur la société, on pourrait également ajouter :

– phone=+33 5 59 405 459
– ref:FR:SIRET=90207729600033
– ref:FR:NAF=5610A
– ref:vatin=FR91902077296
Cy R (2022-05-12 22:07:38+00:00): Hello again! The signage for that skinny asphalt corridor next to the main bus loop at the station suggests that the lane is public access for cars, taxis, ride-shares, etc. A sign reads, "Passenger pick-up and drop-off only. No parking anytime. Tow away zone." An emblem on the station map seems to imply this as well. I don't think it's for bus use.
Cy R (2022-05-12 22:11:16+00:00): Perhaps "access=destination"?
VigilantPenguin (2022-05-13 18:44:41+00:00): Ah, I must have missed that signage, thanks! I thought I recalled seeing a "Do not enter except buses" sign but I'll go double check this weekend.
VigilantPenguin (2022-05-24 22:48:57+00:00): Didn't manage to get over there until today, but you were correct. It appeared not to be a bus-only road so I removed the "access=no" in changeset 121448111
Cy R (2022-06-02 22:54:25+00:00): Cool, thanks for the update!
woodpeck (2022-06-08 22:32:24+00:00): Dear PJ_33, in this changeset, and other recent changesets, you have contributed a lot of information about golf courses that cannot conceivably come from aerial imagery alone. Please use the "source" field that the ID editor displays when saving your edits to state where your information comes from.
PJ_33 (2022-06-09 13:50:43+00:00): These were pulled from Esri World Imagery. I have played this course. The other maps are years behind.
tastrax (2022-05-17 07:21:58+00:00): Hi folks FYI - Phone numbers in Australia should be added to OSM according to the following format with the country code +61 x xxxx xxxx, (+61 xxx xxx xxx for mobiles) or use the phone:AU key if a 1300 or 1800 number as per the wiki guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australian_Tagging_Guidelines/Australian_features  - I have just updated a recent addition that you made to OSM – Cheers
TIPD (2022-05-23 17:43:12+00:00): Renamed the part in EO6 (Larisa - Trikala) to A4 because it has been decided to build a motorway there. In 2015 parts in EO6 were upgraded to a motorway so this would be used for the new motorway 4.
nikospag (2022-06-23 18:16:34+00:00): From now on all your edits will be reverted automatically, until DWG intervenes. (or you contact Greek community).
WoodWoseWulf (2022-05-11 21:05:52+00:00): Hi!
You set the Stolley Park Train as one long tunnel... I'm going to make a wild guess that it's not and that this was an error?
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-14 11:26:17+00:00): Please try to match actual shapes, don't just place random shapes
eginhard (2022-05-18 07:51:30+00:00): Hi imagoiq,
This road has indeed been converted into a cycleway last year, so I just restored it and also removed the parking spaces along it that are no longer there: https://www.osm.org/changeset/121131886
I also connected the EPSIC parking directly to Rue de Sébeillon (approximately, the situation on the ground keeps changing because of the tram roadworks), so there shouldn't be any accessibility issues anymore.

Best,
eginhard
imagoiq (2022-05-18 07:58:05+00:00): Thanks, I should have look more carefully at the date of changes instead of looking at the imagery.

Great that you are carrying cycleways of Lausanne by the way!
literan (2022-05-11 19:45:49+00:00): на сайте ничего нет про самовывоз, только про производство. Так что я убрал тег магазина и поставил тег производства man_made=works
aweech (2022-05-19 22:37:08+00:00): Hi,
I've reviewed your changesets as you requested. I'm not sure how you made the decisions that you did when moving around the boundary for Bear Brook State Park? You've made it look less like the map that you cited (do you have permission to copy that by the way?), and it also doesn't line up with the property lines visible in aerial imagery. Do you have some other source like data from a circumambulation that you were using?

Sincerely,
aweech
madiener (2022-05-19 23:38:30+00:00): I do not know how to see the before and after of what I did and also the document I posted. But I know when I approached Catamount summit, a sign said that I was leaving Bear Brook and "do not enter". The paper map looked like that too, but OSM did not. I tried to re-create as best I could from what I saw at https://www.nhstateparks.org/getmedia/bc482f90-9d2f-483b-9e4d-496997582130/Final-BB-Trail-Map.pdf. I do not know about aerial imagery. In Massachusetts, we have a good GIS overlay that makes it a lot easier to identify boundaries. The current map looks a lot more like like what I thought I drew and it looks like the BB map I attach. I know I am generally not that great with the OSM tools and am learining the best I can. I'm just a guy who loves hiking and wants to help other hikers.
madiener (2022-05-19 23:46:53+00:00): I don't know what you mean by permission to copy. I linked to a government document (map).
BenMaierEU (2023-02-03 23:30:43+00:00): Hey :) Within that changeset, you added a bunch of buildings north of Mandıra Caddesi in Fikirtepe (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/40.99228/29.0573), that since then have made way for the large construction project visible in the most up-to-date Maxar Imagery. Just wanted to get your go ahead before I change your creation. Greetings Benedikt
abakus_uploader (2022-05-11 22:31:32+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
AgusQui (2022-06-03 03:24:05+00:00): psv no es un etiquetado correcto, ya tiene el correspondiente bus=designated
whatmeinfallible (2022-06-08 00:23:35+00:00): Saludos,
Gracias por notar esto. He eliminado las etiquetas access=psv.
Strubbl (2022-05-12 17:57:45+00:00): Hi NotMax, du hast parallel zum Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4066192 noch einen cycleway eingezeichnet. Der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/4066192 enthält aber schon die Information, dass man auch dort Fahrrad fahren darf. Da der cycleway nicht baulich getrennt ist von dem anderen Weg, würde ich dich bitten, den cycleway wieder zu entfernen.

Viele Grüße
Sven
Strubbl (2023-02-07 18:10:41+00:00): Der doppelte Weg wurde mit CS https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/132218757 entfernt
MxxCon (2022-05-12 06:59:40+00:00): That bbox for 3 changes...😐
user_5359 (2022-05-12 17:13:12+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13871636. What is the meaning of the tag bb365:preferred = yes?
csin (2022-05-12 20:52:48+00:00): Hi, thanks for your question! 
We, the MKSZ (Hungarian Cyclist Federation) signposted more than 800 km in the region. https://bringasport.hu/projektek/balatonbike365/ 

I'm just started preparing OSM to be able weighted routing on that network. The bb365:preferred yes tag will be used on routing purpose in our website:
balatonbike365.hu, and our app BB365 https://apps.apple.com/hu/app/bb365/id1572449336 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mksz.bb365
mueschel (2022-05-28 18:22:16+00:00): Please don't use the OSM database to store your own, app specific routing data. Data either needs to be usable by everyone (including a proper documentation) or needs to be stored in your own private database.
multimodaal (2022-07-09 10:16:34+00:00): Hoi, ik heb deze wijziging teruggedraaid; er was een stuk water verdwenen dat er gewoon nog is en er waren meerdere watervlakken samengevoegd die verschillende eigenschappen en tags hadden. Die waren niet voor niets gescheiden van elkaar.

Gelet op de changesetcomment en eerdere discussie op https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=436419 lijkt het er sterk op dat dit vooral is gedaan om een maproulette challange te vervullen. 

Wil je alsjeblieft bij dit soort chhallanges steeds blijven nadenken of het afvinken daadwerkelijk een verbetering van onze database betekent? 
Als een situatie vragen oproept dan kan je via de geschiedenis van een item ook contact opnemen met de betreffende mapper. Dank alvast!
Patr1k_P (2022-05-13 14:59:06+00:00): to construction treba vymazat na tych usekoch kde je to hotove
Rasto_t (2022-05-13 15:31:01+00:00): ok, dik
eggie (2022-05-11 20:28:11+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback Mooi weer actueel.. maar.... meestal zij tweewielers uitgezonderd van eenrichtingsverkeer. Is dat hier het geval.
Dan bijtaggen
oneway:bicycle=no

en dat evt ook voor moped en mofa. Ligt aan het onderbord.

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-05-11 20:32:49+00:00): De uitzonderingen voot tweewielers heb ik toegevoegd.  Zo routeert het weer voor fietsers.
MVG
eggie
user_2066394 (2022-05-11 21:52:08+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/127098515
Wo liegt da die  Hausnummer 13 ?
Strubbl (2022-05-12 18:00:27+00:00): Hallo NotMax, der Weg https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/514297115 war als hw=path korrekt gemappt. Bitte informiere dich über das Tagging im Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath bevor du es änderst.
VigilantPenguin (2022-05-11 19:37:01+00:00): Forgot to include changeset source:
Aerial imagery, street-level imagery (personal), Local knowledge
Lejun (2022-05-12 09:48:08+00:00): « Petite voiture », c’est à dire ? Soit le chemin est carrossable (highway=track) soit il ne l’est pas (highway=path). Attention également à d’autres détails :

– La valeur de surface ne suit pas la classification usuelle[1] ;
– Plusieurs messages d’erreurs indiquent que le chemin n’est pas connecté au réseau existant.

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:surface
無調味堅果 (2022-06-21 18:57:00+00:00): please add name:zh-Hant=哈爾基夫
dieterdreist (2022-06-21 19:53:00+00:00): sorry, I do not read Chinese and I cannot judge this proposal, please add it yourself
watmildon (2026-01-19 07:08:20+00:00): The population here is marked as "2" I presume this is an accidental truncation of "2,960" which is from the 2020 census (or similar). 

Easy to fix up but I figured I would mention it. :-D
Aleks-Berlin (2022-05-12 15:45:41+00:00): Hi tyler,
please follow https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia#Examples
not writing wikipedia=http...
Thx, Alex
tyler_expedia (2022-05-12 16:01:59+00:00): Hi Alex, 
Thank you for the feedback.  I will make sure to make updates accordingly.
Thx, Tyler
Karry (2022-10-02 05:40:06+00:00): Ahoj, jsi si jist(a) tím parkem Pražačka na Vítkově? Sportovní areál Pražačka je více na východ. Osobně bych ten park spíše pojmenoval Vítkov.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-10-02 09:09:51+00:00): Zatím nevím, ukazuje mi to prázdnou mapu.
Yakari (kleiner Indianer) (2022-10-02 09:26:06+00:00): Tak jsem to dal načíst znovu. Mě osobně zmátla ta ulice, Mapy.cz mají park Vrch Vítkov, hned to jdu přepsat.
abakus_uploader (2022-05-11 22:31:33+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Lejun (2022-05-12 09:49:08+00:00): Même commentaire que précédemment[1]. La valeur de surface est à corriger.

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120855638
Geaquinto (2022-05-18 19:18:23+00:00): Boa tarde.

Gostaria de saber qual foi a intenção desse conjunto de alterações. Não ficou claro pela descrição nem pelo resultado. A alteração do mapa está cheia de erros e possivelmente a comunidade irá desfazê-la. Não havendo resposta em poucos dias, iremos reverter unilateralmente por entender que a mensagem foi ignorada.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-05-16 16:48:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted because it deleted valid data.
MxxCon (2022-05-12 07:03:02+00:00): Hello.
Since you are mapping in NYC, please use local language(English) so that local mappers can understand your comments. 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/120856756
sorcrosc (2022-05-11 21:07:14+00:00): type=restriction:conditional ? Sure?

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
matheusgomesms (2022-05-11 21:31:04+00:00): I guess sorcrosc is right. It seems you have to put back 'type=restriction' and add 'restriction:conditional=*'.
emvee (2022-05-12 21:11:21+00:00): Yes, correct, that is an error by me, let me correct it, thanks for the feedback!
emvee (2022-05-12 22:23:31+00:00): Corrected.
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-12 06:49:15+00:00): Pagrindiniuose/baziniuose žemėlapiuose tokios žiūrovų vietos ir neturi būti rodomos, nes tai yra perteklinė informacija. Jos galėtų būti rodomos savuose (custom) žemėlapiuose, tarkim konkrečiai Dainų slėnio žemėlapyje, jei kas nors tokį sugalvotų kurti.
MindaugasS (2022-05-16 22:40:29+00:00): Vienas žiūrovų vietų blokas netgi turi adresą (Kostiuškos 1B), t.y. oficialiai laikomas pastatu (nors tikrovėje tas „pastatas“ yra tik suolų konstrukcija). Likęs suolų plotas pietuose yra didelis (pagal užimamą vietą didesnis už daugelį pažymėtų pastatų) ir puikiai matomas palydovo nuotraukoje. Jis žymimas geruose žemėlapiuose (pvz., https://arcg.is/0eSWbu ), tai ar nebus sarmata, jei jis liks nepažymėtas pas mus? Jeigu jo žymėti tikrai nereikia, kam tada egzistuoja tagas https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dbleachers ?
Be to, visas Dainų slėnio plotas dabar pažymėtas kaip „pieva“, o tikrovėje ten asfaltas.
Tomas Straupis (2022-05-17 07:00:53+00:00): Na adresas ir pastatas yra netapatūs dalykai. Adresas gali būti be pastato kaip ir pastatas be adreso (arba pastate gali būti daug adresų). Nustebino, kad Vilniaus planas juos pažymėjęs kaip pastatus... mano galva žemėlapyje tai neturi būti rodoma kaip „užstatymas“. Oficialiuose Lietuvos žemėlapiuose tribūnos nepažymėtos kaip pastatai (https://www.geoportal.lt/map/). Žymų yra daug visokiausių ir galima savo dar susigalvoti. Žymėti irgi galima viską, ką tik sugalvojama tik tas žymėjimas neturėtų trukdyti praktiškai plačiai naudojamam žymėjimui na ir reikia žymėti tikromis žymomis, nesistengiant pritempti žymėjimo taip, kad objektas „atsirastų“ kokiame nors konkrečiame žemėlapyje (pvz. OSM-Carto). Žodžiu žymėti bleacherius, žinoma, galima, tik vat mano galva nereikia pridėti building žymos tik tam, kad „pasimatytų“ žemėlapyje, jei tai nėra pastatas.
SK53 (2022-07-18 17:15:04+00:00): I have reverted this changeset as it is entirely incorrect. The locations & status of Barnstable & Hyannis have remained stable on OSM since around 2007: I'd be really surprised if you know better than everyone who has used it, or edited in the area over the past 15 years.

Reversion changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/158843349.
spiregrain (2022-05-12 05:51:50+00:00): Hi there and welcome to OSM.   Where does rhe "street membership" make it look like the buildings are part of the street itself?   Have you had a look at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:associatedStreet ?   In particular the "roles" section?  Members of a relation can have a role,.  Please have a look at the link.
rskedgell (2022-05-12 17:31:45+00:00): While I think the purpose of roles in the relations (which I created some time ago) has been misunderstood, I don't think associatedStreet relations are particularly useful in this area.

The relations are probably better off being deleted rather than remaining unmaintained and now broken.
rskedgell (2022-05-12 17:52:37+00:00): The relations I created around Maryland are now history.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120900248
spiregrain (2022-05-12 19:19:57+00:00): Fair enough!  @tj42 Thanks for the prompt!
tj42 (2022-05-12 19:30:37+00:00): Hi both thanks - the issue I was having was when pulling the OSM data with type highway - value tertiary I was getting all the buildings too. It appears associatedStreet relationships was causing the issue. I wouldn't expect highway - tertiary to get the buildings too.
rskedgell (2022-05-12 19:53:42+00:00): The street relation looked useful when I discovered it on the wiki, but a quick look at taginfo shows only 56 in GB, which may include the 21 I have just deleted.

Just out of interest, what was the query which pulled the street relations as well as the highway ways?
sanch3z (2022-05-13 18:53:46+00:00): Hallöchen und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Und könntest du bitte kurz erklären warum der Weg wie er eingezeichnet ist Gebäude kreuzt und sich größtenteils mit den bereits eingezeichneten Straßen überschneidet?
Gibt es diesen Fußweg wirklich und ist er auch so Beschildert (vgl. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dfootway)? Um was für eine "Teststrecke" handelt es sich? Bitte benutze für deine zukünftigen Änderungen aussagekräftigere Kommentare (siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments#Beispiele).
berndw (2022-05-14 07:19:23+00:00): Auch von mir ein Willkommen ;-)

Ich habe den fraglichen Fussweg gelöscht, da der in dieser Form keinen Mehrwert darstellt.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120965837

Hier noch etwas zum Lesen:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Beginners%27_guide

Trotzdem viel Spaß beim Mappen
Bernd
Joseph R P (2022-05-12 18:58:33+00:00): Hello, please consider mapping businesses as buildings or points rather than as landuse so they can have proper Wikimedia-connected tags. If you do choose to map the gas station as the area rather than the structure itself, adding landuse tags is redundant.

This is another reminder to please use more descriptive changeset comments explaining what you are doing in the edit rather than where it is, especially considering none of these edits were in the Pennsylvania State University.
bxl-forever (2022-05-12 08:58:57+00:00): Thanks but try not to break other modes of transport when you rearrange streets. :-/  OpenStreetMap is not a map solely for cycling.
Fixed by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120876678
JJIglesias (2022-05-12 17:09:03+00:00): Saludos, del ESAM q agregaste, no tendras mas datos? como telefono, email, numero del edificio y otra data significativa?
Gracias
literan (2022-05-12 16:34:15+00:00): тут уже есть питч, зачем дубль?