piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
0000FF berries (2019-06-09 12:08:37+00:00): Γεια σου, καλωσήρθες στο OpenStreetMap :) Με το changeset 70722243, εκτός της αλλαγής του ονόματος του κινηματογράφου, σβηστήκανε ένα σωρό άλλα δεδομένα (https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70722243), οπότε έκανα την επαναφορά τους. Αν θες δοκίμασε να κάνεις την αλλαγή του ονόματος με τον iD editor. 

Μια σημείωση: στο addr:street βάζουμε μόνο το όνομα του δρόμου - τον αριθμό της διεύθυνσης τον βάζουμε στο addr:housenumber. Μερικές οδηγίες που προσπαθούμε να ακολουθούμε είναι εδώ: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Αν έχεις απορίες, μπορείς να ρωτήσεις στο help.openstreetmap.org, στο τμήμα του φόρουμ για την Ελλάδα (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=27) ή να ρωτήσεις κι εμένα. 

Καλές χαρτογραφήσεις.
eggie (2019-05-29 10:34:43+00:00): Oke... foot=permissive wil alleen zeggen dat de eigenaar van de grond je ten alle tijde de toegang kan ontzeggen. Het routeert gewoon. 
Het hek staat nog op access=no
vehicle=no houdt alle voertuigen tegen. Dus ook fietsen.
MVG,
Eggie
Mark Spijkerman (2019-05-29 10:36:40+00:00): Het pad is ook niet geschikt om op te fietsen
eggie (2019-05-29 11:35:38+00:00): Dag Mark, Oke.., maar nu routeert het wel voor tweewielers.. behalve het hek dan. 
Wanneer je er niet mag fietsen/brommen vul je aan vehicle=no
Wanneer het een slecht pad is is het wellicht geschikt voor mtb.
Je zult dus op een highway=path altijd een keus moeten maken conform de bebording.
Up to you.
Wel kun je nog taggen smoothness=bad als aanvulling.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-29 08:06:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
sky-hub (2019-06-11 19:08:55+00:00): zurückgesetzt siehe Änderungssatz: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/71154375
Tantri Maya (2022-12-02 02:37:31+00:00): Hi arnaud_mapali
You did great job. Due to highway connectivity issue on https://maproulette.org/challenge/30179/task/142914018 id way 693165146
also based on Bing, Maxar and Esri Imagery, I found overlaping highways.
So i have to delete it.
Thank for your understanding.
Happy Mapping
eggie (2019-05-29 08:11:56+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.

review.. adressen horen niet op een gebouw zelf. Die bevinden zich al op de adresnodes die bij import vanuit het Kadaster zijn meegekomen.
Het adres er svp weer afhalen.
MVG,
Eggie
DanielH24 (2019-05-29 08:16:46+00:00): Bedankt voor je reactie, ik heb het aangepast
eggie (2019-05-29 08:21:58+00:00): Top!
abakus_uploader (2019-05-29 22:33:01+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2019-05-29 08:09:42+00:00): Wellicht het adres van de website nog aanpassen?
MVG,
Eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-13 16:11:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 136059221 where the changeset comment is: Reverting MAPS.ME garbage such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/10893535607 .  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7125
gurglypipe (2019-05-29 10:18:33+00:00): Hi, there’s already a building for the Quaker Meeting House in Grasmere, just south of the node you added. Are there two parts to the meeting house, or is one of them an unnecessary duplicate?
LivingWithDragons (2019-05-29 10:54:24+00:00): Oops, I'm not sure how I missed that. I took a photo of a sign on the wall of the Glenthorpe B&B as I walked past.

I have removed my node, and added a Map Note so that the exactness can be checked by someone who is in Grasemere.
gurglypipe (2019-05-29 10:58:54+00:00): Nice, thanks.
mavl (2019-06-19 16:52:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 71409389 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: nonexistent objects].
eggie (2019-05-29 08:48:30+00:00): Top!
sovereign_ch (2019-05-29 22:37:10+00:00): Gelöscht. Das nächste Mal bitte Augen auf, der Laden ist (offenbar an der korrekten Adresse 259) bereits eingetragen. Wie der korrekte Name lautet? Nicht mein Bier... ich spreche Deutsch, nicht vietnamesisch. Und falls der expandiert hat, dann muss der Knoten vom bestehenden "Limmat Lädeli" angepasst werden. Danke.
PeanutButterRemedy (2019-05-29 15:15:13+00:00): This node has all of the traits of a poor SEO addition meant to game the system. One of those traits is creating a throwaway account that is never monitored for feedback. If this is not the case, please comment and we can help restore your addition.
aceman444 (2020-12-03 07:25:45+00:00): Zdravim, nema byt "kulturny dom" skor amenity=community_centre a community_centre=cultural_centre ? Bezne to tak v obciach je.
Ale ak bol tento v Turzovke naozaj urceny len na centrum umenia a nie ine aktivity tak samozrejme OK.
mavl (2019-11-10 08:09:25+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Dimacn (2019-05-31 17:49:38+00:00): 1. Пожалуйста не добавляйте фейковые объекты с выдуманными названиями. 2. Дворовая территория - это не парк отдыха https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:leisure=park  3. В name пишем только официальные названия https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name
geow (2019-05-29 20:03:05+00:00): Hi Kutul, welcome to OSM.

This looks like an import. Maybe you're not aware that imports have to be discussed before the execution, for details see the guidelines: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/

I don't know of any corresponding discussions at the import mailing list nor the Nepal Forum.

After some random checks you obviously imported raw gps tracks, converted them as a data layer and tagged them as highway=* like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693219676 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/693219666#map=19/28.50323/82.25649&layers=D

This is strongly discouraged and and you have been warned to do so by the validator in JOSM.

Among other drawbacks, you have created countless highway duplicates.

I think you'll agree that I revert this change set.

Maybe you'd like to check these sites first, to get some OSM training first:

https://learnosm.org/en/
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice

Best regards
geow
geow (2019-05-29 20:16:11+00:00): This change set was fully reverted in change set 70746939 where the comment is "Revert of undiscussed import (among others raw gps data converted to highway=* resulting in countless hw-duplicates."
Rbanick (2019-05-30 05:29:54+00:00): Hi geow,

I'm an experienced OSM user and am supervising Kutul's work, mostly remotely. I thought we'd addressed highway duplications before upload but apparently not -- mea culpa. It's not really possible for me to supervise in person so these things happen.

Thanks for the quality control. I'll work with her to sort things out and upload quality data in the coming days.

Cheers
Rbanick (2019-05-30 05:30:27+00:00): I meant to say -- this was not meant as an import, just the manual addition of raw data sent by others working in remote, disconnected areas.
geow (2019-05-30 08:41:57+00:00): Hi Rbanick, thanks for the reply. 

Mass importing 10k nodes from raw (unedited and unaveraged) gps traces and directly converting them to highway=* easily qualifies as an import *and* an automated edit. This is *strongly discouraged.* 

Besides the data duplications and questionable positional accuracy of a single gps trace, there are other fundamental problems from this changeset:

Do not delete or replace existing data but try to correct and improve it and keep the data history
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Do_correct_errors
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history

Don't use descriptive names like "ward no 1 to ward no 2" or "range chaur to chimali" etc.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_use_name_tag_to_describe_things

Don't introduce undocumented tags like "REC_TIME" or "REMARKS". What does "source=Idea International"mean?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Document_your_custom-tags

Average out gps traces if ever possibly
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Average_out_GPS-traces

Please use good changeset comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Good_changeset_comments

The OSM community would be happy, if you follow these guidelines in your future contributions and supervisings.

And it would be very helpful to upload the gps data to the OSM server to support editing for other users
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Upload_GPS_tracks

Thanks
geow
Rbanick (2019-05-30 12:05:55+00:00): Hi geow,

Thanks for the detailed and thorough breakdown. I am aware of these issues and working on them with Kutul; the work was meant to be done in stages, much more carefully. And is now being done so; I will personally review future uploads until the Kutul is up to speed.

Please note Kutul is in not uploading raw traces but is in fact removing obvious noise and aligning with imagery. I do agree a Simplify Way to cut down on some nodes is in order.

Pardon the oversight. Birthing a new OSMer is sometimes messy.

Cheers
geow (2019-05-30 13:15:30+00:00): > Birthing a new OSMer is sometimes messy.

That might be true, but step by step you'll get to the highest mountain. ;-)
geow (2019-05-30 13:16:12+00:00): btw, what does "source=Idea International"mean?
Rbanick (2019-05-30 14:22:01+00:00): IDEA International is an NGO working in these areas. Their staff are collecting a lot of GPS tracks and points that we're using to make maps. As good open data citizens we're also uploading the non-sensitive data OSM. Still working out the kinks on that, clearly.
geow (2019-05-30 14:49:27+00:00): Thanks Rbanick! 
Did I understand that correctly, does "Their staff are collecting a lot of GPS tracks and points that we're using to make maps." mean that "we" is a group of *organised* mappers?

If so, you might be interested in https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

In order to be transparent towards other contributors "organized edits" should have a Wiki page for the particular activity, and record the page in the list under Organised Editing/Activities: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities

Thanks
geow
Rbanick (2019-05-30 15:11:41+00:00): I'm aware of the organized editing guidelines and we are in touch with the local community. We = me and Kutul, but only until Kutul is trained and can do it herself. I'm happy to update the wiki and will get to that soon enough.
mavl (2019-11-10 08:09:21+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2019-11-10 08:09:17+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
mavl (2019-11-10 08:09:13+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
InsertUser (2019-05-29 17:50:43+00:00): Thanks
aharvey (2019-05-29 09:21:05+00:00): Are you saying that only buses can't uturn here but other vehicles can? I think the restriction shouldn't be specific to buses. In NSW it's illegal to uturn at traffic lights unless signposted as allowed.
FXRonaldo (2019-05-29 09:37:08+00:00): Hi, yes. You are correct. I'll make the adjustments accordingly.
Leo Slager (2019-05-29 11:33:32+00:00): Dag Bram,
je hebt nu de fietstunnel van de maxheight voorzien.
Dat was vast niet je bedoeling.
Het fietspad (blauw stippellijnte) routeert sowieso niet voor gemotoriseerd verkeer.
Ik maak even een correctie.
Bram bwaste (2019-05-29 11:41:33+00:00): Excuses, was inderdaad niet mijn bedoeling. Hartelijk dank!!
andrashann (2019-06-07 17:15:52+00:00): A KDP ezen szakaszát ma jártam be, a "régi" útvonalon szinte vadonat új jelzések vannak (beleértve egy PPecsét jelzés a pusztavámi festékgyárhoz), az új útvonal nem létezik. Honnan jött az infó? Én nem találok erről a változásról semmit az interneten. Érdemes lenne visszaállítani ezt a changesetet.
BáthoryPéter (2019-06-07 21:04:43+00:00): Szia! Én Berki Zolitól kaptam az infót, aki pár hónapja a Cartographia vonatkozó térképéhez gyűjtött változásokat a megyei szakosztálytól. Ezt elég tuti biztos festés áthelyezésnek tudtuk, talán még térkép részlet is volt hozzá.

Elég kellemetlen a helyzet, megpróbálom jövő héten elérni Zolit, hogy mit tud erről, minden esetre a Carto térkép már így ment nyomdába :(

A visszaállítást megcsinálom, ha minden tisztázódik, pláne hogy más változtatások is vannak a changesetben.
BáthoryPéter (2019-06-07 21:05:35+00:00): ps: ráadásul még logikus is lenne ez a festés áthelyezés...
andrashann (2019-06-12 08:55:52+00:00): Köszönöm, hogy utánanézel. A fenti kommentből kimaradt, hogy a P+ meghosszabbíta sem történt meg (még) a korábbi térképi állapothoz képest (amikor csak a P-től a Z-ig ment).
andrashann (2019-07-14 15:42:31+00:00): Szia Péter! Van bármi update ezzel kapcsolatban? Úgy látom, hogy még mindig a nemlétező útvonalat mutatja a térkép.
BáthoryPéter (2019-07-14 19:55:13+00:00): Szia! Szóltam Zolinak, megígérte, hogy megpiszkálja a megyei szervezetet, de valahol elakadt a dolog. Rákérdezek megint.
BáthoryPéter (2019-07-22 10:30:07+00:00): Nem könnyű itt a nyári szabadságok alatt bárkit is elérni...
Annyi választ kaptam, hogy: „Le fogják így festeni, az MTSZ-nél is megjelent hivatalosan ez az új verzió.”
Kerestem, de én nem találom az MTSZ-nél ezt ez új verziót :(
Domcsi (2019-07-29 13:23:14+00:00): Sziasztok!
Megkérdeztem a jelzésfestőt:
Épp holnap és holnapután megyünk ezt a szakaszt festeni, 
ne fáradj a visszaállítással.

Az új piros sáv meglesz 2 nap alatt, 
az egyéb munkálatokat (régi szürkítés, és új P+)  is folyamatosan végezzük majd utána.
Nakaner-repair (2019-05-29 09:26:20+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changeset 70664569.
trigpoint (2019-05-29 16:38:08+00:00): Are a really a place of worship?
literan (2019-05-29 11:12:47+00:00): не вандаль
Warin61 (2019-07-24 08:48:21+00:00): Hi,
Way: Perth Busport (552513578) needs some work... looks like it has 3 'building parts'...  but they have tags for a building as well.. very confusing.
Владимир К (2019-05-29 09:35:01+00:00): ошибка комментария. Удаление дублированных точек
Phyks (2019-05-29 13:12:09+00:00): Bonjour,

Sur les footway=sidewalk, il est précisé "oneway=yes". Cela ne devrait-il pas plutôt être "oneway:bicycle=yes" ?

Sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/279539075, sur l'imagerie aérienne, cela semble être un cycleway:left plutôt, non ?

Pour les suppressions de bandes cyclables, elles ne sont pas visibles sur l'imagerie aérienne en effet. Avez-vous vérifié sur le terrain ou sur Mapillary ?

Au vu de l'imagerie aérienne, je n'aurais mis que cycleway:right sur https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23788467. Si la gauche existe bien, elle devrait probablement être en opposite_lane.

Bonne journée !
eggie (2019-05-29 10:05:51+00:00): Dag Marcel.. een adres hoort niet op dit paadje.. Ook footway=sidewalk "moet"er weer af.
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-29 10:06:26+00:00): De straatnaam uiteraard wel, maar niet de huisnummers.
Marcel van Delft (2019-05-29 12:20:00+00:00): Oke, excuus voor de foutjes. Is de wijziging nu niet bijgesteld en dus afgekeurd?
eggie (2019-05-29 12:24:56+00:00): Ha Marcel... Jet kunt het zelf doen. Je bedoeling is uiteraard goed. We volgen in het begin de edits van startende mappers... ook om te helpen.  Up tou you.  Pas je het zelf aan?
MVG,
eggie
eggie (2019-05-30 07:02:09+00:00): tags aangepast name=Hoge Rijndijk
lmagreault (2019-05-29 11:13:55+00:00): Attention les boîtes à livres se taggent public_bookcase et non library ou shop=books. La boîte à livres de Champagnole existe déjà. Changeset correctif 70729509.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70726268
OlivierHaricots (2019-05-29 20:51:31+00:00): OK, désolé, ce sont des modifs via Maps.me où la boîte à livre de Champagnole ne figure pas encore et où la rubrique  public_bookcase n'est pas disponible.
mavl (2019-11-10 08:09:09+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
Frans S (2019-06-01 14:42:25+00:00): Hello easy tiger. Thanks for mapping here
a request/ You map so many buildings without squaring them; that means validators had to spend a lot of time to square them.  Please square each building with the S key in ID editor. It cost little effort and the validators will thank you for that
Best regards and keep mapping
Leo Slager (2019-05-29 23:20:16+00:00): prima zo
mavl (2019-11-10 08:09:05+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
bison166 (2019-05-29 16:08:32+00:00): Moin Hermann51....Tag:building=service ist nicht existent lt.Wiki
trigpoint (2019-05-30 16:50:08+00:00): Hi, just wondering why you have removed the Irish and Welsh wikipedia links leaving only English? 
Whilst they were not in the correct format you simply threw that information away you did not even add a wikidata link. 
Sometimes it is simpler to just add a wikidata tag in order to avoid the sensitive issue of choosing a language although I am favouring both Welsh and English when mapping in Wales.
Cheers Phil
PantherStrix (2019-05-31 01:02:25+00:00): Hi,
the tagging for wikipedia is wikipedia=[language code]:wikipedia title. It doesn't matter which language you choose, because an app or website whould always switch to your preferred language when their is an wikipedia-site. See OSM-Wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:wikipedia -> "In almost all cases, a single wikipedia tag as described above is sufficient." The Wikidata link I just forget ...
Greetings TheBlackMan
mavl (2019-11-10 08:09:01+00:00): This changeset was redacted. Reason: an incompatible source.
eggie (2019-05-29 10:38:32+00:00): Dag Jan.. dat zou niet uit moeten maken, want het is een fietspad.
Het zit ergens anders in.  
'k zal even kijken.
Welke router gebruik je?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2019-05-29 10:50:39+00:00): Ik zie dat Leo Slager het al heeft aangepast dus het zal als alle updates zijn doorgevoerd wel gaan routeren. bicycle=yes hoeft niet op een fietspad.
De voorgaande mapper heb ik gewezen op het feit dat highway=platform problemen veroorzaakt. Het zou zomaar kunnen dat het op veel meer plaatsen is omgetagd. 
In de Openfietsmap routeert het wel, maar dat zal wel komen omdat er een fietsroute overheen loopt. Dan routeert zelfs een wandelpad.
Gr Eggie
Jan Wollring (2019-05-29 11:20:17+00:00): Ik routeer via OpenRouteService (http://maps.openrouteservice.org) maar die zijn wat minder snel dan de andere routeerders met updaten. Deze heb ik gecontroleerd met Graphhopper, en routeert vandaag niet. Overigens moet er ook iets gebeuren met het veer Pannerden-Doornenburg, want die routeert helemaal niet (ook niet voor auto's). Fijn dat je helpt! :-)
eggie (2019-05-29 11:39:02+00:00): Oke.. zal zo nog even kijken naar Pannerden Doornenburg. Volgens mij gaf Leo al aan dat Graphhopper probleem heeft met de routering. 
Niet te veel blindvaren op die routeerders van OSM zelf.
Wellicht dat Ad Verburgh als voorgaande mapper nog reageert.
eggie (2019-05-29 11:49:22+00:00): In deze changeset zie je waar in alle wegen gaten zitten omdat er highway=platform is getagd
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=64689811
Ik zal Pannerden Doornenburg weer aanpassen
eggie (2019-05-29 12:04:19+00:00): Pannerden Doornenburg highway=platform weer omgezet in highway=tertiary.
Eigenlijk zou de rest van die veerdiensten nog gecheckt moeten worden.
Er loopt wel ergens een discussie over die platforms. Denk dat het hier averechts uitpakte. 
Succes met de speurtocht naar platform. 
In overpasa turbo kun je een query maken om highway=platform op te sporen. Zie er  bv nog één bij Beuningen.
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Jsb

Eggie
eggie (2019-05-29 12:09:30+00:00): Slijk-Ewijk .. Beuningen omgetagd
eggie (2019-05-29 12:15:41+00:00): echteld Druten aangepast
eggie (2019-05-29 12:20:34+00:00): .. en nog een paar.. Soms is het platform apart gemapt naast de weg, maar ook wel op de weg highway=platform. Zoekplaatje dus.
eggie (2019-05-29 12:27:43+00:00): Maasbommel aangepast
eggie (2019-05-29 12:28:26+00:00): Ben bang dat heel veel meer is omgetagd naar highway=platform
eggie (2019-05-29 14:53:42+00:00): Voorgaande mapper heeft gereageerd en zal z'n edits nalopen.
Dimacn (2019-05-31 17:56:57+00:00): 1. Объект лес в данном случае вами использован некорректно. На космоснимках нет сплошного леса. 
2. В name пишем только официальные названия https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:name  3. Пожалуйста исправьте.
Dimacn (2019-05-31 18:01:32+00:00): Вы ошибочно отметили Автомагистраль — дороги, обозначенные знаком 5.1 "Автомагистраль" https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:highway=motorway . Тут её нету. Пожалуйста удалите этот тег.
Constable (2019-05-31 08:14:03+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto e grazie per le modifiche!
Tieni conto che se la tua fonte sono le note come questa https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/1788964 , bisogna chiuderle/risolverle se la mappa è stata modificata di conseguenza. Lasciarle aperte significa che il "problema" segnalato è ancora presente sulla mappa.
Grazie, ciao!
eggie (2019-05-29 13:05:13+00:00): Dag uniteam.. Nuttige bijdragen.  Probeer wel als het mogelijk is op de adresnodes bij te taggen.
Dan is adres gekoppeld aan instelling.
Je edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=70728539
MVG,
Eggie
szydzio (2019-05-30 07:18:10+00:00): place=country should not be used on relation. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:place=country
Stereo (2019-06-05 11:35:57+00:00): Hi Noam! As far as I can tell from walking there this is not a path but a boundary, so I'll be re-tagging it as `boundary=administrative`.
Stereo (2019-06-05 11:36:05+00:00): Happy mapping :)
Noam (Moovit) (2019-06-05 16:03:09+00:00): Awesome, I was pretty sure there wasn't stairs there, just didn't want to delete before I was certain. Thanks!
ndm (2019-05-29 23:41:00+00:00): Should at least be shared foot/cycle?
sabas88 (2019-05-30 07:27:54+00:00): Bonjour,
d'où est ton information?
J'habite dans Genes et ce tronçon de pont n'a pas encore été complètement démantelé
Anonix35 (2019-06-04 07:39:27+00:00): Bonjour,
Oui il reste en effet quelques piles encore à démonter

L'autoroute en elle meme n'existe plus, donc je pense qu'il vaut mieux la supprimer totalement, vous ne trouvez pas ?
oba510 (2019-06-02 05:49:23+00:00): Hi, in this changeset you added barrier=kerb to several crossings. That is not accurate; there are no curbs in the middle of the street at any of them. You also renamed a few Starbucks as you said; but I did a quick check and like most Starbucks shops around here they're all named "Starbucks Coffee" in giant letters on the front of the store.  

Please be careful using these validators. They're a useful tool but not always correct.
jambamkin (2019-06-02 09:37:52+00:00): Thanks for the corrections, the kerb one stood out to me as something that would need to be surveyed so I quickly stopped using that one.  Surprised about the Starbucks Coffee's, I'll try contacting the person who started the Maproullette challenge.
Mazda05 (2019-05-29 14:44:50+00:00): thx
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70729496
maraf24 (2019-06-01 17:15:49+00:00): Na S8 nie ma numerów węzłów.
maraf24 (2019-06-01 17:20:19+00:00): Na A8 zresztą też.
Vittoria Lacchini (2019-05-29 16:06:50+00:00): più precisamente erano erroneamente indicate con il simbolo P due aree che non sono adibite a parcheggio regolamentato: il TAG dei due punti in questione era errato