piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Rogoyski (2021-08-10 21:23:09+00:00): Ja rozumiem, że na landuse=residential można dodawać nazwy osiedli (rozumianych jako projekty inwestycyjne, a nie jednostki morfogenetyczne miasta), ale czy nie wydaje Ci się, że umieszczanie tam nazw spółdzielni mieszkaniowych jest już krokiem za daleko?

Nazwą osiedla są od biedy Jary albo Stokłosy, te już zresztą, jak wiele nazw przedsięwzięć budowlanych epoki PRL, awansowały do rangi jednostek morfogenetycznych (place=neighbourhood), natomiast nikt nie używa np. nazwy SMB Ursynów na określenie całego archipelagu rozrzuconych po dzielnicy działek, jakie wchodzą w skład relacji, jednocześnie. Tak naprawdę poszczególne budynki powstawały w różnych czasach, jako odrębne projekty inwestycyjne, i nie mają żadnej wspólnej nazwy.

Dodatkowo większość podziela raczej stanowisko, że w OSM nie mapujemy podziałów własnościowych gruntów, a tym de facto stają się tak narysowane multipoligony. Zwłaszcza zaś nie można podziałów własnościowych utożsamiać z  zagospodarowaniem terenu (landuse).

Przynależność poszczególnych domów do spółdzielni i sposób, czy w jaki nazwy projektów budowlanych zaczęły funkcjonować jako części miasta, a także np. historia poddziałów i przekształceń ursynowskich spółdzielni to wszystko bardzo ciekawe zagadnienia, ale mam wątpliwości, czy to jest właściwy sposób, by te dane rozpowszechniać.

Zamieszczam komentarz do rewizji licząc także, że może inni mapowicze zwrócą na niego uwagę.
syntex (2021-08-10 21:53:06+00:00): Co proponujesz w zamian?
syntex (2021-08-10 22:13:08+00:00): Można zmienić teoretycznie z name na operator dla każdego obszaru a relacje skasować
Rogoyski (2021-08-11 17:26:48+00:00): Jest to jakiś pomysł, na pewno plus do likwidacji relacji, bo te wszystkie lokalizacje to nie jest jeden obiekt "zagospodarowania terenu". Może wręcz dać tego operatora na budynki, wtedy obszary zagospodarowania (landuse) mogłyby być bardziej naturalne niż sztucznie podzielone według własności.Przy okazji da się wtedy jednolicie oznaczyć też obiekty handlowo-usługowe należące do spółdzielni.
syntex (2021-11-13 00:12:16+00:00): Ok skasowałem wszystkie https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113716624
gileri (2021-08-03 19:12:59+00:00): C'est plus raisonnable comme vitesse :p
JeroenHoek (2021-08-04 06:59:14+00:00): Nice work adding those murals! The address information should not be there though. These buildings have several addresses, but these are all assigned to discrete parts of the building (apartments, offices), not the building itself.
JeroenHoek (2021-08-04 07:01:07+00:00): In fact, Lange Marktstraat 28 does not exist.
osm_lokjo (2021-08-04 08:30:45+00:00): Hi Jeroen thanks for the feedback, I just noticed it so I'll remove them from all.
JeroenHoek (2021-08-04 09:13:24+00:00): Thanks!
GinaroZ (2021-08-04 14:36:56+00:00): Hi, where is the locked gate on this road as it would be good to have it add - is it right at the southern end or nearer the farmyard?
Recumberic (2021-08-04 15:37:06+00:00): Hi GinaroZ.

The gate is about 3-4 metres north from the southern end of the service road. There is also a large gate across the concrete slab of the farmyard. However, it was not locked and I was able to open it to get through and closed it behind me. (I was travelling from north to south through the farmyard as I have done before. A local person said that the farmer did not mind people passing through the farmyard. I have no idea whether the route is a public right-of-way or not.

Cheers

Eric

PS: thanks too for your comment about adding a note. Noted! ;-)
datendelphin (2021-08-28 08:24:13+00:00): Hallo Sampeto 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbench wäre der richtige tag für ein Bänkli. 
Grüsse 
Michael
sampeto (2021-08-29 19:11:37+00:00): Da hast du natürlich recht, Michael. Danke für die Korrektur. Gruss
RobinLovelace (2021-08-03 18:30:57+00:00): Comment to clarify: this edit was made based on personal knowledge, not Google. The image shown in StreetView of the area is out-of-date, showing only light segregation on one side of the road (bollards are now on both sides).
Baloo Uriza (2021-08-11 16:44:26+00:00): Nice catch, looks like the old rule cited (and looks like bicycle:source can now be removed) was repealed on August 9, 2019 and now points to a newly renumbered code preventing lane splitting.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109108889
BCNorwich (2021-08-04 07:09:19+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

No need for a multipolygon relation for a simple object (house). I've amended that and squared up all the buildings. Squaring up is easy in iD editor.

Regards Bernard.
wkdgs (2021-08-04 10:41:34+00:00): Hallo,

ich schreibe dir, weil du angegeben hast dass jemand deine Änderung überprüfen soll.

Bei z.B. durch Naturereignisse zerstörten Objekten sollten diese nicht (sofort) gelöscht werden. Insbesondere dann nicht, wenn sie wahrscheinlich irgendwann wieder aufgebaut werden.

Dafür gibt es den folgenden Präfix: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:destroyed:

Generell ist es sinnvoll vor dem Löschen zu schauen, ob nicht einer der Lebenszyklus-Präfixe besser passt: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

LG
winkeldings
Ray Mandes (2021-08-03 18:41:00+00:00): The size of this changeset was unintentionally large due to accidentally touching a node along McAllen/Edinburg city boundary. However, this resulted in no noticeable change along said way.
wkdgs (2021-08-04 15:13:28+00:00): An einigen Teilstücken steht noch construction=trunk.

Was auch komisch ist, ist dass die B47 auf dem einen Stück highway=trunk und auf dem anderen highway=primary ist. Ist das so richtig?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109109102
Pt873 (2021-08-03 22:45:42+00:00): Olá, essa edição está incorreta.
berms (2021-08-04 16:22:08+00:00): Thank you for the correction.
Tilia_J (2021-08-03 19:34:31+00:00): Op welke wijze is dit pad afgesloten?

Wat mag ik onder beheerder verstaan?
Sjoerd H (2021-08-03 20:10:39+00:00): Dit pad is compleet verwijderd, bestaat niet meer.

Ik ben de terreinbeheerder.
Tilia_J (2021-08-03 20:40:43+00:00): Beste Sjoerd, wat versta je onder verwijderen?

Het punt wat ik wil maken is dat beheerders of eigenaars op Openstreetmap zaken verwijderen op basis van eigen beleidsopvattingen terwijl deze nog steeds fysiek aanwezig zijn en bijvoorbeeld enkel zijn afgesloten met borden of een takkenrill.

Openstreetmap streeft na een afspiegeling te zijn van de fysieke toestand ter plaatse (map what's on the ground).

Om die reden zijn we extra alert op het moment dat een beheerder of eigenaar de kaart gaat bewerken.
Sjoerd H (2021-08-03 21:51:49+00:00): Nee, de paden zijn echt niet meer te zien in het veld. De paden zijn al een klein jaar geleden verwijderd en nu niet meer herkenbaar door de groei van de vegetatie dankzij de vele neerslag in de eerste helft van dit jaar en de zomerse temperaturen daarna. De paden zijn fysiek dus echt niet meer aanwezig.
П3тр0виЧъ (2021-08-26 04:39:49+00:00): Откат.
b-holdet (2023-04-15 13:40:19+00:00): Har du tjekket alle steder med ford=yes?
Det ser meget underligt ud, at alle stier oversvømmes af vand i denne skov.
j numminen (2021-08-03 19:13:55+00:00): Korjaus: muokkasin tien 145 vartta enkä 148:n
M!dgard (2021-08-04 17:10:58+00:00): Is het wel zeker drinkbaar water als het is om de voeten af te spoelen?
philippec (2021-08-04 17:15:53+00:00): Dat moet je aan Pieter vragen, ik heb het niet gemapt en er nog niet van gedronken.  Ik vermoed van wel, de leiding is in elk geval van drinkwaterkwaliteit.  Douches op het strand zijn ook van drinkwaterkwalilteit.
OSM staat in Vlaanderen vol met dubieuze tapkraantjes.
M!dgard (2021-08-06 20:08:40+00:00): Sorry, ik had het helemaal verkeerd gezien, ik dacht dat jij hem toegevoegd had! Ik zal het vragen aan Pieter.
sheldonelectric (2023-01-25 21:38:31+00:00): Συγνώμη, το έσβησα, μετά σκέφτηκα να σε ρωτήσω, τι ήταν ο κύκλος χωρίς ταγκ που έβαλες πάνω στο κτήριο; https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970180899
Cartographos (2023-01-25 21:42:40+00:00): Δεν θυμάμαι ακριβώς, λογικά θα βοηθούσε στην σχεδίαση. Μικρό το κακό, αν χρειαστεί θα το ξαναφτιάξω. Έχε υπ'όψιν σου ότι όλην αυτήν την περιοχή την έχω κάνει με μεγάλη λεπτομέρεια και οι συντεταγμένες έχουν ακρίβεια 1-2 εκατοστών αφού βασίστηκα σε υπάρχοντα τοπογραφικά (τα οποία είναι open source βάσει νόμου)
sheldonelectric (2023-01-26 11:14:22+00:00): τεράστιο έργο...
είσαι στο matrix με κάποιο άλλο username? είμαι ο nicoelectric
pitscheplatsch (2021-08-06 09:19:18+00:00): Duplicate data?
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30826233
wkdgs (2021-08-04 13:21:16+00:00): Hallo,

bei deiner Bearbeitung wurde der "building:levels"-Tag entfernt. Es sieht so aus als wäre das versehentlich entfernt worden.

LG
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109111808
Klaus25 (2021-08-04 21:32:24+00:00): Hallo,

Danke für den Hinweis.
Ich habe die Info ergänzt.

VG,
Klaus25
keithonearth (2021-08-03 20:04:19+00:00): While some of the changes this edit introduces may be "temporary" on the ground, we're looking at 5 years for completion of the Broadway line, so it's good to map them.
SomeoneElse (2021-08-09 14:11:31+00:00): Hello Some User,
I'd be really helpful if your changeset comments had a bit more information in than simply "Accuracy Update" - perhaps explain what you were editing and where, and what the source was?
Best Regards,
Andy
(I happened to notice this change by accident while looking for something in Paphos)
InfosReseaux (2021-11-03 10:29:02+00:00): Bonjour,

J'aimerais comprendre à quoi correspondent les objets man_made=pump ajoutés pendant ces modifications s'il vous plait ?

Y a-t-il vraiment des pompes en pleine rue ?

Bonne journée
Alexandre148025 (2021-11-05 12:33:45+00:00): Bonjour,
Il s'agit de pompes à bras sur des puits, certainement afonctionnelles.
Mais le tag n'est peut-être pas le bon.
InfosReseaux (2021-11-05 12:37:52+00:00): Oui, je vois le cas. Merci du retour.

Ce serait plutot man_made=water_well + pump=manual + pump_mechanism=piston + handle=lever

Ce qui permet de qualifier le puits, la pompe et son levier

Bonne journée
portalaventura (2021-08-03 22:49:11+00:00): A Rua Miguel Nascimento não tem o formato dado por você em sua edição.

Corrija e pare de vandalizar os dados. Já avisei você e o responsável pelo seu time diversas vezes.
RiverBearings (2021-08-05 16:05:37+00:00): Portalaventura. Depois de você e eu estabelecemos mais passos no telegrama, abordarei todos os seus problemas aqui. Só queria fornecer uma atualização e assegurar-lhe que isso é notado e será atendido em breve. Obrigado pela colaboração e feedback.

Portalaventura. After you and I establish further steps on telegram, I will address all your issues here. Just wanted to provide you with an update and assure you that this is noted and will be taken care of soon. Thank you for the collaboration and feedback.
3ngineer (2021-09-28 05:29:42+00:00): Hi, are you certain about the location of the proposed subway where it crosses under Great Northern Way upto Broadway? This vancouver city PDF from 2014 shows the subway going under the Canvas residential area at a much different angle: http://council.vancouver.ca/20140204/documents/p1.pdf
keithonearth (2021-10-03 06:17:57+00:00): Thanks for asking.

I'm afraid I'm not sure of that part of the subway. I was basing this edit on the images I saw of the construction plans right around Emily Carr. If I made any changes in the Broadway area, it was based on speculation of what a reasonable turning radius would be.
maromaro (2023-05-23 09:43:45+00:00): Ich denke, der Knoten 1617360915 wurde versehentlich als amenity=yes gekennzeichnet.
portalaventura (2021-08-03 22:47:14+00:00): Você destruiu a forma geométrica da Rua Luiz Moro.

Qual seu proposito?

Pare de vandalizar os dados.

Denunciei você. Espero que esse meio que o OSM fornece para lidar com usuários como você funcione.
RiverBearings (2021-08-04 01:35:50+00:00): Obrigado por apontar esta área. Eu estava alinhando todos esses dados e não planejava deixar a geometria tortuosa da Rua Luiz Moro. Esta é uma área com muitos dados densos e eu precisei fazer o upload em vários changesets. Espero que isso ajude a explicar os problemas que você está vendo atualmente. Conforme discutido, estou atualmente adiando outras edições para que possamos discutir mais sobre o telegrama.

Thanks for pointing out this area. I was in the process of aligning all of this data and did not plan to leave the kinked geometry in Rua Luiz Moro. This is a very data dense area and I needed to upload in several changesets. I hope this helps explain the issues you’re seeing currently. As discussed, I am currently holding off on further edits so we can discuss more on telegram.
wkdgs (2021-08-04 11:01:47+00:00): Der vorherige Tag "building=grandstand" ist legitim: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:building%3Dgrandstand

Falls die Tribüne noch existiert, sollte sie nicht gelöscht werden. Das es zu Verwirrungen kommt ist kein Problem der Karte, sondern der Renderer. Also der Programme, die die Karte darstellen. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
CoyKoi (2021-08-10 20:20:08+00:00): Hi, you probably shouldn't tag this address as a shop if the premise isn't open to public. BTW I like the name of your street
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109114072
SatoruTajiri7 (2021-08-10 20:42:36+00:00): It is open, though it is booking only due to limited time managing the business
A67-A67 (2021-08-04 00:48:02+00:00): In deze wijziging wordt de fietsenwinkel in de fietsenstalling in een restaurant gewijzigd.
A67-A67 (2021-08-04 00:49:23+00:00): Ik heb het hersteld.
b-jazz (2021-08-05 16:27:29+00:00): Hi IanVG, I was correcting some minor errors in this building and noticed that several rooms have the exact same nodes, but also have the same tags. I'm assuming the rooms are meant to be on different levels. Could you double check and correct these problems? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970103798 is an example that shares the same path as another room with the same tags.
IanVG (2021-08-09 12:29:25+00:00): Hi b-jazz, thank you for the notification. I am using OsmInEdit https://osminedit.pavie.info/ to make these edits to these buildings and I had no idea that any of the rooms were even being duplicated! I  am not sure if the duplicated room problem is a user problem or a editor problem, because it seems that I would have to re-trace that room after I already made in order for this problem to occur. Is there a kind of query/ error detection protocol you are running to find these kinds of mistakes. I would like to see where else this has happened. I cannot detect these problems unfortunately, simply through the OsmInEdit editor. Thank you for the help!
IanVG (2021-08-09 12:32:01+00:00): In fact, do you detect any kinds of patterns or logic to which rooms (i.e. indoor=room or indoor=area + separate way as indoor=wall) or on which levels this problem is occurring? This is quite bad I am seeking to fix the mistakes I have made.
b-jazz (2021-08-10 18:56:01+00:00): Hey Ian. We (speaking for the rest of the OSM community) really appreciate your attention to detail and desire to do things the best way that you can and we like to see desire to learn and improve. If you ever have questions, feel free to reach out and we'll help.

With that said, I came across the errors with a tool called OSM Inspector (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-83.37559&lat=33.95658&zoom=18&overlays=long_ways,self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way) that show two things I'm interested in: two nodes at the same exact point in space, and ways that cross over (or "intersect") themselves. So that's the first thing that tipped me off to the problems.

I was cleaning up some of them with the editor that like named "JOSM". It is a little "advanced" and can scare people off, but if you plug away at it, you can learn more and more and be very productive with it over time. One of the advantages of JOSM is some very robust QA verification tools and one of the things it warned me about was identical ways (same exact nodes) having identical tags. 

Hope that helps a little bit.

If you want more interactive help, there is a Slack server where you can discuss OSM with hundreds of others that are happy to help. Feel free to join here: https://slack.openstreetmap.us/
Glassman (2021-08-04 18:35:23+00:00): #TIP: Normally we add the beach to the water polygon. Like in this case, if the water is in the wrong location, it's okay to just move the water body. Can you update to join the two features?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109114771
alexey_zakharenkov (2021-08-13 21:32:15+00:00): Здравствуйте.
Согласно https://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Key:destination, в тег destination заносится текст с дорожных знаков. Пожалуйста, верните значение тега обратно.
Кремлёвский штурман (2021-08-14 16:08:22+00:00): НА дорожном знаке указано с нарушением требований по указанию информации на подобных знаках. Должно быть указано в соответствии с маршрутом дороги, установленным постановлением Правительства России.
alexey_zakharenkov (2021-08-14 19:38:25+00:00): Определение из вики не делает оговорок о необходимости соответствия надписей каким-то законам, и это отвечает принципу ToG. Для надписей, какими они должны по-вашему быть, можете завести другой тег.
Кремлёвский штурман (2021-08-15 04:57:01+00:00): Во-первых, вышеназванное вики только на английском, а перевод можно интерпретировать по разному,во-вторых, данный указатель составлен со ошибками, что теперь все глупости и неточности с указателей следует переписывать!
alexey_zakharenkov (2021-08-15 08:37:13+00:00): Подобных съездов на одном только МКАДе не меньше сотни. Прежде чем вы всё перетегируете на свой лад, дайте, пожалуйста, пояснения к своей точке зрения: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=837864
Кремлёвский штурман (2021-08-15 09:06:31+00:00): Поясните, как разместить ответ на форуме?
alexey_zakharenkov (2021-08-15 10:12:20+00:00): Думаю, нужно залогиниться, тогда внизу сразу доступно поле "Quick reply". Кажется, логин на форуме независим от аккаунта на osm.org.
portalaventura (2021-08-03 22:44:45+00:00): Você destruiu o ângulo entre a Rua Lavras do Sul e Rua Pedro Moraes Germany.

A maxar é fonte para essa alteração? Acho que não.

Mais uma vez estou avisando você sobre essas edições desastrosas. Porque você continua fazendo isso?
RiverBearings (2021-08-04 00:07:01+00:00): Obrigado pelo comentário. Conforme observado em meu comentário sobre o changeset, eu estava corrigindo os problemas ao sul da Rua Pedro Moraes Alemanha de acordo com seus comentários anteriores sobre o changeset, mas ainda não cheguei às áreas ao norte da Rua Pedro Moraes, Alemanha. Vou adiar as edições futuras até ouvirmos você. Também respondi no Telegram.

Thank you for the comment. As noted in my changeset comment I was fixing the issues south of Rua Pedro Moraes Germany per your previous changeset comments, but I have not yet gotten to the areas north of Rua Pedro Moraes Germany. I will hold off on future edits until we hear back from you. I have responded on Telegram as well.
DUGA (2022-08-27 14:22:35+00:00): OSM has a limit of each segment not exceeding 2000 nodes.

You do not need to use 1200 nodes for this creek which can be done in less than 200. Water features change all the time, these redundant nodes will be removed eventually by future mappers.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/970223550
Prusaker (2021-08-04 05:52:19+00:00): Возле торговой галереи "Сеница" нет кругового движения. Проверено вчера вечером (3.08.2021). Круг не замкнут.
eggie (2021-08-04 06:01:38+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-08-04 06:12:48+00:00): Kleine aanpassing verricht. Info samengevoegd met bestaande adresnode. Dubbele tagging van fast_food verwijderd.
MVG'eggie
ovruni (2021-08-03 22:56:47+00:00): Hola, tal como le he escrito anteriormente la etiqueta building=service no se encuentra destinada a los edificios de negocios. [0] Por otra parte, el texto "mz 23" no da suficiente información sobre lo que se ha realizado en este conjunto de cambios. Por favor revise la documentación sobre los buenos comentarios en los conjuntos de cambios. [1]
Saludos
[0] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dservice
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Buenos_comentarios_en_conjuntos_de_cambios
Sandal man (2021-08-04 07:12:25+00:00): Hi, thanks for adjusting the osm but you are drawing a new path next to a old one which you are changing in a track?
Also you are crossing to rivers without a crossing (bridge, tunnel  or ford)
Can you have a look again?
Thanks Jan
rombik97 (2022-02-17 07:51:51+00:00): Hi, sorry for the late reply. Can't remember the path/track thing exactly, but any rivers in this area are dry creeks that only flood with heavy rain so I considered adding fords superfluous - it's sometimes dubious whether one should even map them as streams
Sandal man (2022-02-17 08:08:58+00:00): After 7 months I also can't remember it :-)
But I think it is this here 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/709279745#map=19/38.37714/-0.89477
Sandal man (2022-02-21 09:24:39+00:00): Fixed
tekim (2021-08-04 01:57:30+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap!  It is great to have you as part of our community.

Thanks for the edits.  Many of in the community like to see changesets with a smaller geographic extent, such as the size of a few neighborhoods or a small town.  It facilitates easier review.  This changeset's bounding box spans much of both North and South America. Other than that, the edits I checked looked good.  Look forward to seeing more from you.
Mike
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109117191
wkdgs (2021-08-04 14:25:40+00:00): Hallo Radelspass,

mir ist aufgefallen, dass alle deiner Bearbeitungskommentare der letzten Woche "ok" lauten. 

Es wäre sehr hilfreich, wenn du stattdessen kurz beschreibst was du geändert hast und woher die Informationen dazu kamen. Aktuell ist es recht aufwendig das nachzuvollziehen.

LG
winkeldings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109117747
Falsernet (2021-09-22 18:28:27+00:00): Why have you changed pelican crossings to be tagged as zebra crossings and disconnected them from pavements and cycle paths?
Pete Owens (2021-09-22 19:24:13+00:00): The cycleway isn't mapped seperatel;y, but as a tag on the streets - so cannot be separated from the crossings. Though it looks as if someone has subsequently duplicated them.
Anton Khorev (2021-09-22 21:50:22+00:00): Pete Owens,
why is it wrong to map this cycleway it separately? In this case it also served as a footway. You don't mind this part of the footway to exist as a separate way:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/964452554  
But you deleted its footway-cycleway combined part:  
https://osmcha.org/changesets/111559966/  
Why?
Why cycleway:left/right=separate is not a better option?
Falsernet (2021-09-22 22:05:12+00:00): Pete why are you continually destroying accurate data
Pete Owens (2021-09-22 22:29:53+00:00): I am simply restoring accuracy. There is no _separate_ path or cycleway at this point - just that cyclists are permitted to use the pavement which is indicated by tagging the highway. If you start to map pavements as separate ways that is going to create a huge amount of clutter since virtually all streets have pavements on either side - the way to deal with that is to tag the absence of footways on the few roads without them
Falsernet (2021-09-22 22:37:23+00:00): "Clutter" is irrelevant when the ways describe actual real life features. You're making it *less* accurate - there is no restoration here.