piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
xa058 (2018-06-22 14:28:19+00:00): Hi,

thi changeset created a duplicate node, one of the twins was: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5708909619
( I did delete the other already )

This cutted AS 15, creatin routing problems. I observed at minumum two of your recent potlatch edits to create such error. Could you check what's going wrong?
ulan_bator (2018-06-26 08:16:09+00:00): Sorry, if my edits have caused confusion, I have no idea what when wrong.
seewäldler (2018-06-21 15:41:37+00:00): Hallo TZorn!
Hier hast du an einigen Straßen den Zugang 'Anlieger frei' den es u.a. für Hotels und Tiefgaragen gibt gelöscht. Siehst du dir das noch einmal an?
TZorn (2018-06-21 16:38:29+00:00): Hallo Seewäldler. In diesem Changeset? Sagst du mir welche Straße?

Im Changeset 60043691 habe ich bei einigen Straßen das motor_vehicle=destination durch vehicle=destination ersetzt. Meinst du das? Auch nichtmotorisierter Verkehr kann ja Anlieger sein. Ich weiß nicht wie viele Pferdekutschen tatsächlich die Hotels anfahren, aber wenn schon, dann sollte es man auch richtig machen. Wahrscheinlich müsste man sogar horses noch einschließen.
seewäldler (2018-06-21 17:59:56+00:00): Hallo TZorn!
An den 'Einfahrten' in die Fußgängerzone an den Kreuzungen Eckenerstraße/Friedrichstraße und Martinstunnel/ZOB weiß ich sicher, daß die Zufahrt zu den Hotels und der Tiefgarage unter dem K42 und für Anlieger mit expliziter Beschilderung freigegeben ist. Ziemlich sicher ist auch die Zufahrt zum Kindergarten Nikolaus freigegeben und die diversen über die ganze Fußgängerzone verstreuten Garagen dürfen sicher auch von Berechtigten angefahren werden. Nach der genauen Beschilderung kann ich mal schauen, mir scheint es aber so als sollte fast das gesamte Fußgängerzonengebiet mit 'destination' getaggt werden.
TZorn (2018-06-21 18:59:55+00:00): Und hab ich jetzt irgendwas geändert, was dem zuwiderläuft? Ich habe, meine ich, nur an die Salzgasse, die Geäudedurchführung am Ende der Friedrichstraße und die Sonnenunterführung Einschränkungen getaggt.Alles so, wie ich es gestern beim Durchlaufen und tatsächlich auch bei der Durchfahrt mit dem PKW gesehen habe.
Ritchy Latte (2018-06-21 15:36:09+00:00): こんにちは
コメントには、大まかな場所や編集した事物などを、記述していただけると助かります。
Truchin (2018-06-21 20:12:30+00:00): Encore une fois, une station de tram n'est pas une station de métro ou de train. Merci de ne pas modifier railway=tram_stop en railway=station
marcknj (2018-06-21 19:14:15+00:00): I want to remind you AGAIN that the NAME of the location should be written at name:... and NOT name:en because it will NOT be displayed on the map if there ist just the English name!
Truchin (2018-06-22 08:31:08+00:00): Encore une fois, tu fais une modification qui détériore la base 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/318536943#map=19/48.79609/2.36837
Pourquoi avoir supprimé le railway=station et pourquoi avoir modifié le nom ?
Novenx (2018-06-22 04:19:15+00:00): 省道平青乐线是唐山市，乃至于是河北北部地区最重要的省级干道之一，无论是行政级别，还是交通量，还是大部分路段的本身质量，都应划归到主要道路这一范畴。

而滦南县的滦海公路是按照国家一级公路标准修建，不仅承担了滦南县北环和西环的责任，而且是通往作为重要工业区曹妃甸的一条干道，无论是按照中国标准，还是OSM给出的主要道路标准，都应算作主要道路。相反，罗城街虽然在滦南规划上是未来县城南部的主干道，但遗憾的是目前并未打通，该路目前既不是滦南的交通主干道，在交通量上也不如其他道路，理应降级到次要道路

而且，S044省道并非命名为大钊路
SK53 (2018-06-21 15:22:13+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap and thanks for adding the Scout & Community Hall.

You might be interested to know that you can also add an additional tag to say that this is a community facility. There are two choices: amenity=community_centre, amenity=community_hall. The former gets shown on the main map like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/421936843.

Also many village halls have defibrillators these days, and I see if any village should have one it's Hillsborough! These can be added using emergency=defibrillator.

In both cases you should just be able to search for the term to add it in the editor.

Hope this might be of some use,

Jerry
whb (2018-09-27 10:53:10+00:00): Hallo!

Was war denn die Quelle für die Änderung von "Waghäusler Straße" in "Waghäuseler Straße"?
Ein Straßenschild?
Angeblich soll nämlich "Waghäusler Straße" (ohne zusätzliches "e") richtig gewesen sein.
Hjart (2018-06-23 07:01:11+00:00): How did the default name get replaced with that russian text here? Your reply could be helpful at https://github.com/mapsme/omim/issues/8905#issuecomment-399022554
Supaplex (2019-02-07 15:23:21+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 06:56:20+00:00): Hi Simon,
This change also has the naming problem that I described in another changeset of yours. Please have a look at the tags of the node and sort them out :).
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
mueschel (2018-06-23 17:17:48+00:00): Hi,
could you explain the tag "tm_data" you added on these nodes?
Thanks, Jan
KanaLee (2018-06-25 16:17:17+00:00): Hi Jan,

My bad. The tag was applied in error and has been removed. I will be modifying my workflow to ensure that incorrect tags are not applied in the future.

Thank you,
Kana
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 06:55:08+00:00): Hi Simon,
Please have a look at the Stadthause node. It now has both a name and a name:de tag but with different names. This seems to be a typical problem that happens when using maps.me to update names.
Cheers,
dikkekodel
blubberblubb (2018-06-25 07:41:25+00:00): Hi dikkeknodel,

Sorry about that, thanks for spotting! I'm travelling right now, but I will address the issue by tomorrow evening.

Cheers, Simon
dikkeknodel (2018-06-25 07:54:33+00:00): Hi Simon,
Thanks for getting back quickly, no worries, everybody makes mistakes. If you don't make mistakes, you would probably not be doing anything useful either :-). MAPS.me is just not helping the user to see what you are actually doing. But it's always a trade-off, since updating while on the go is also a great benefit.
There is a website that helps me to monitor this (http://mmwatch.osmz.ru/?country=Switzerland), so I regularly check. 
Happy travels and mapping,
Cheers,
dikkeknodel
blubberblubb (2018-06-26 12:18:57+00:00): Hi dikkeknodel,
I addressed your comments in this Changeset, let me know if it needs a different fix: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/60181130

Cheers, Simon
tosky (2018-07-29 13:11:00+00:00): Fayor, ai prossimi aggiornamenti, potresti spezzare le modifiche in blocchi localizzati più piccoli, magari con descrizione più precisa? Diventa difficile capire cosa sia effettivamente cambiato con modifiche che prendono l'intera città (o, in altri casi, altre la città)
BCNorwich (2018-06-22 06:58:36+00:00): Hi, Irish Village is the area/locality. I've added a place POI to the map and removed the two path names.
Regards.
BCNorwich (2018-06-22 06:29:25+00:00): Hi, I.ve amended the house name from name=25 to name=Rommino.

Regards
BCNorwich (2018-06-22 06:34:24+00:00): Hi, 75 is the house number not the name. The number 75 is tagged.
Regards
0000FF berries (2018-08-26 19:45:23+00:00): Γεια σου Γιώργο :) Με το συγκεκριμένο changeset σου έχει μεταφερθεί μια καφετέρια (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5097632623) μέσα σε έναν αρχιαολογικό χώρο. Η μεταφορά έγινε κατα λάθος; Και μήπως θυμάσαι αν ήταν πιτσαρία, όπως το όνομά της υπονοεί; Ευχαριστώ :)
0000FF berries (2018-09-01 16:23:12+00:00): Thanks για την επιβεβαίωση Γιώργο :) Επανέφερα την καφετέρια στην αρχική της θέση https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/62201582 Καλές χαρτογραφήσεις.
Riyadi IRM-RV (2020-07-27 02:35:35+00:00): hi minh. just wanna inform you. i modified this road, change to tertiary and smoothing the geometry. w7742475246 . thank you
Pilligrimus (2018-06-30 09:23:50+00:00): верните дорогу назад. там нет никаких искусственных неровностей
Pilligrimus (2018-06-30 09:17:40+00:00): вы зачем дорогу удалили?
Владимир К (2018-07-03 12:31:16+00:00): вы не должны решать в чем есть необходимость, а  в чем нет, если обозначено верно
Владимир К (2018-07-03 12:26:47+00:00): откатываю
Владимир К (2018-07-03 12:23:08+00:00): это не будет работать
*Martin* (2020-12-26 08:10:20+00:00): Ahoj. Tie pristresky "Winter shelter" a "Summer Shelter" maju fakt anglicke mena?
letihu (2020-12-02 20:22:34+00:00): Bist  du sicher dass dieses Gebäude
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/600409157/history
auf diesem Weg
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/93801883/history
steht?
!i! (2020-12-07 19:35:19+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. In den Luftbildern ist relativ gut zu erkennen, dass der Weg offenbar außenrum muss. (Hab leider kein Vor-Ort Wissen).
dcapillae_old (2018-06-21 18:13:54+00:00): Hola, Alvi. Buen trabajo.

Para mapear las vías que pasan a través de un edificio, puedes usar la etiqueta «tunnel=building_passage». Tienes más detalles en el wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Key:tunnel#tunnel.3Dbuilding_passage

En el mapa de Málaga encontrarás varios ejemplos que pueden servirte de muestra: https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=36.74923&mlon=-4.42341#map=19/36.74923/-4.42341

Feliz mapeo.

Cordialmente,

Daniel
angys (2018-06-22 06:57:09+00:00): Your update have causes Subway validator error. Please see this http://osmz.ru/subways/malaysia.html and hope you can fix it asap...
rene78 (2018-06-22 09:35:36+00:00): Hmmm... to be honest, I don't understand this error. The relation has no "holes". Do you know what is meant with this error message?
angys (2018-06-22 09:51:03+00:00): "Hole in route rails near": All railway way members that form the track of a route need to be sorted from start to finish with no holes in the track. If you are using JOSM to edit simply use the "sort relation members" button on the left of the route's relation editor. JOSM relation editor will also highlight with red dots if subsequent ways are not connected:
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/428616/40660929-b5f0bffe-6352-11e8-8902-52b77e33d89b.png

From:https://github.com/mapsme/subways/issues/48
rene78 (2018-06-22 09:53:41+00:00): Okay, thanks. Need to do that later at home.
rene78 (2018-06-23 21:18:29+00:00): I did what claudiush described on github. Hope it is okay now.
muralito (2018-06-22 02:26:59+00:00): No. This way is no secondary, Only tertiary, by urban planning and there are no government plans to improve it. 

You should not expect that the secondary o tertiary networks are connected/continuos or folllows the same logic as in a developed country. In Montevideo almost no investment has been made to improve road infrastructure in  the last 50 or more years.
geoJenn (2018-06-22 02:58:14+00:00): Thanks for the information, Muralito! You're right, every country has different levels of road development and infrastructure. OSM highway classifications are great for this issue because they are based on how a road is used instead of how much a government develops a road. Do you have more advice for me?
muralito (2018-06-22 12:02:23+00:00): For Montevideo, you could find the official road hierarchy in 
http://intgis.montevideo.gub.uy/sit/tmp/estructuradores.zip

This is not meant to strictly follow them, just take as other input to see how the traffic flows in the city.

The advice would be not to put roads in categories higher than the ones really are.

For most other cities in Uruguay, tertiary is enough to tag the preferential roads, and you also need to maintain the classification of the route in the section that crosses the urban area (to keep network continuity)

The other area of the country where the urban road infraestructure is more developed is Maldonado/Punta del Este, and in this case IMO adding "secondary"  is enough.
GunSmoker (2022-05-30 11:39:35+00:00): А почему эту могилу нанесли на карту?
jkits1 (2022-05-30 15:13:20+00:00): Простите. Это личное. Не думал что отобразится на общем редакте.
goldfndr (2018-06-21 18:23:45+00:00): If the PDF ("10 cm") is incorrect, please revert this changeset.
szalona_entropia (2018-06-22 22:34:42+00:00): edycja wycofana
viloan (2018-06-21 18:46:20+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
zzptichka (2018-06-21 21:04:06+00:00): There is nothing duplicate about outlining bridge polygon and it's actually encouraged:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dbridge
Would you mind reverting it?
dvdhoven (2018-06-22 07:01:43+00:00): Ik heb de route 05-55 gecorrigeerd. Bij het Haarlemmerplein is de oversteek eenrichting en je gaat tegen de richting in. Dat kan niet.
Ik heb de route nu een stukje door laten lopen en dan bij het Nassauplein over laten steken. Daar kan het wel.
Verder heb ik een stuk Zaanstraat oneway:bicycle=no gegeven. Ook daar kwam de route er niet door.
dvdhoven (2018-06-22 07:02:22+00:00): Nog even, het eenrichting is echt een probleem ding waar je bij rcn heel goed op moet letten
Topo GPS (2018-06-22 14:04:15+00:00): Ok, dank voor de aanpassingen. Ik heb ze bekeken en ben het er mee eens.
fjavier_gr (2018-07-29 09:54:28+00:00): Hola, 
No se deben eliminar vías para volverlas a crear con otros atributos, además has puesto como vías de servicio las entradas y salidas de la autovía, no es correcto.
Marc_ch (2018-06-29 22:09:51+00:00): Bonjour, Hello,
pourriez-vous mettre une description à vos changements ? "know-how" n'explique pas ce qui a été fait.
Please use a good changeset description, know-how said nothing about what/why.
Salutations, Regards,
Marc
rocou (2018-06-30 08:36:35+00:00): Bonjour,
OK. Je vais essayer d'être plus précis dans mes changements.
Dans le cas d'espèce, il s'agissait de corrections que j'ai fait parce que je connais bien les lieux et j'y passe régulièrement.
BER319 (2018-06-22 08:58:17+00:00): Hallo sandrow75,

bitte beachte doch einmal das WIKI!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Parking

Das was du hier immer einzeichnest sollte besser als

parking:lane=* - Der Haupt-Tag, um Parken an Straßenrändern zu taggen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane

eingezeichnet werden.

Für normale Parkplätze bitte auch das hier beachten

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kreuzschnabel/diary/39830

Vielen Dank
BER319
Dave Venables (2018-06-21 19:54:56+00:00): Apologies for the accidental typing mistake and rude word in the change set comment. Should of course be the White Swan that the Defribillator is on the side of.
viloan (2018-06-21 19:39:26+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
BER319 (2018-06-22 09:00:05+00:00): Hallo sandrow75,

bitte beachte doch einmal das WIKI!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Parking

Das was du hier immer einzeichnest sollte besser als

parking:lane=* - Der Haupt-Tag, um Parken an Straßenrändern zu taggen.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:parking:lane

eingezeichnet werden.

Für normale Parkplätze bitte auch das hier beachten

https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kreuzschnabel/diary/39830

Vielen Dank
BER319
mavl (2018-07-20 13:58:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:41:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:47:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:40:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:25:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:30:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:17:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:52:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:14:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:16:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 13:42:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:41:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
BCNorwich (2018-07-06 06:02:01+00:00): Hello, you added Way: 600436669, a footway but tagged it foot=no. Any reason for this or is it accidental?
Regards Bernard
cBogdiukiewicz (2018-07-06 07:26:11+00:00): Hi, Bernard. Yes, sorry that was a mistake. I have fixed that now! Thanks for spotting it.
Cheers
Chris
BCNorwich (2018-07-06 07:40:31+00:00): All the Best
mavl (2018-07-20 13:48:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 60894588, 60906989, 60903390 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:21:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:13:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 15:53:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60909068 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 17:26:21+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60911831 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].
mavl (2018-07-20 19:15:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 60916139 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2095].