piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Peilscheibe (2015-08-13 12:20:01+00:00): Und die dritte Frage: wenn die Information, daß einzelne Wege Teil dieses Netzes sein sollen, nicht von der Beschilderung kommen kann (die ja nicht vorhanden ist), woher kommt sie dann?
ekw (2015-08-13 13:42:52+00:00): Hallo,
zur 1. Frage:
mir war aufgefallen, das die Radwege im Kreis BB (28333 und 536364) irgendwann nicht mehr in den Karten erschienen.
Ich habe nach Unterschieden zu den Tags der Radwege in anderen Kreisen gesucht. Diese sind alle als Route getagt, siehe  Tü 536836, RT usw.
In den Foren habe ich dazu keine eindeutige Regelung für Radwege gefunden. 
zur 2. und 3. Frage: ich habe nur wenige Wege getagged, bin erst seit kurzem wieder mehr mit dem Rad unterwegs.
Ich kann also nur zu 'meinen' Wegen etwas sagen und die sind alle grün auf weiss. Manche der Wege sind jedoch nicht in beiden Richtungen sauber ausgeschildert.
Zum Beispiel Herrenberg (ab Schulmeisterbuche) nach Sulz, da ist in der Gegenrichtung kein Pfeil an der Abzweigung im Jettinger? Wald, sonst sind die Schilder da.
Ähnliches habe ich öfters gefunden.
literan (2015-08-03 11:36:43+00:00): не совсем понимаю, зачем вы добавили линии без тегов (или с единственным тегом area=yes, что равносильно того, что она без тегов). Удаляю все.
clickheretoday (2015-08-03 11:42:10+00:00): это были заготовки детской и спортивной площадки, а так же новые дорожки в парке
literan (2015-08-04 09:35:07+00:00): ну вы уж постарайтесь в следующий раз сразу теги повесить, потому что заготовки без тегов в базе оставлять нельзя
maxerickson (2015-11-21 01:35:26+00:00): I live just down the road from the stretch you marked trunk between Gladstone and Rapid River there. I agree that it looks an awful lot like trunk, and it even has a special speed limit set by the state (65 instead of 55), but it's really just horribly overbuilt and isn't functionally any different than the stretches on either end.
Baloo Uriza (2015-11-21 07:58:48+00:00): Expressways and freeways are kind of special cases in US tagging, getting Trunk and Motorway respectively.
maxerickson (2015-11-21 10:54:24+00:00): The stretch you have marked trunk is not limited access. It's not connected to much, but it isn't limited access.
Baloo Uriza (2015-11-21 12:52:09+00:00): It appears to be limited access.  It's not _controlled_ access, but it is limited access.
maxerickson (2015-11-21 13:47:53+00:00): There's a stop light at the southern end and another at the divergence of M 35 and no stretch longer than about 3 miles without a crossing.

The only road that wasn't connected to it when it was built was 26th road (by Masonville). I guess the minor streets in Gladstone also aren't connected, but several connections in the span of a mile is not really limited access.
Baloo Uriza (2015-11-21 13:56:30+00:00): It appears to have been deliberately disconnected from most of the grid in gladstone to limit access, and I'm not seeing any (mapped) driveways connecting to it.  Looks pretty consistent with most semi-rural expressways in the midwest after looking at the aerials and looks to be consistent with the MUTCD definition of an expressway.
maxerickson (2015-11-21 14:24:16+00:00): I always thought that expressway was for roads with grade separation at (especially major) intersections. In this case, the major intersections are stop lights.
Baloo Uriza (2015-11-21 14:40:47+00:00): That's a freeway.  Expressways are pretty much anything that fills in the gap between a freeway and the surface classifications.  Examples of expressways would things that would otherwise be a freeway but are only single carriageway (no center divider, but controlled access), or aren't fully controlled access (and have the occasional driveway or intersection).  It's not uncommon for an expressway to later be developed into a freeway (as is gradually happening to US 75 north of Tulsa and probably sometime by the time I'm old enough to draw SSI will be a freeway), and sometimes they get downgraded to a more traditional highway (as has happened to many former expressway segments of Route 66 after its retirement in order to cut costs maintaining a mothballed route).
maxerickson (2015-11-21 14:42:54+00:00): http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/glossary/glossary_listing.cfm?TitleStart=E ?
Baloo Uriza (2015-11-21 14:54:27+00:00): That's the first I've seen any planning documents suggest a definition other than what's seen at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited-access_road#United_States, which cites http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/HTM/2003r1/part1/part1a.htm as the definition for "expressway" as "a divided highway with partial control of access," and "freeway" as "a divided highway with full control of access."
maxerickson (2015-11-21 15:05:55+00:00): "partial control of access" is not exactly specific. A stop sign would pretty much meet that definition.
Baloo Uriza (2015-11-22 15:20:11+00:00): Fully controlled access generally means a complete lack of driveways and at-grade intersections, with access limited only to entry and exit ramps. Partially controlled means there may be some driveways and intersections, but they're relatively sparse, and some may be controlled access junctions (ramps).
Baloo Uriza (2015-11-22 15:25:53+00:00): Or similar situations where it's single carrageway but all the junctions are ramps.
maxerickson (2015-11-22 15:36:04+00:00): Right. In this case 100% of the intersections are at grade. The stuff at http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33053301#map=17/45.85630/-87.02232 is not really ramp like, there are stop lights, and there are railroad crossings.

There aren't a whole lot of intersections in the longer stretch, but that;s more because they built the road as a bypass through a swamp. Which is something that would happen with roads more deserving of trunk, but in this case it isn't bypassing anything, and we get back to where I started, the road is ridiculously overbuilt and doesn't actually serve a different function than the stretches on either end of it.
Baloo Uriza (2015-11-22 16:52:08+00:00): Whether or not the road is overbuilt as an expressway is immaterial to the fact that it's an expressway, though.
maxerickson (2015-11-22 18:16:15+00:00): It is not an expressway. That is is overbuilt makes it look like one in the aerial imagery.
Baloo Uriza (2015-11-23 08:01:15+00:00): It still appears to meet the definition of an expressway.
maxerickson (2015-11-23 13:51:43+00:00): Well, we are at an impasse. I think I'll change it back to primary and if you still think it is trunk after you have driven it a few times you can change it back.
Baloo Uriza (2015-11-24 07:26:23+00:00): I recommend keeping it at trunk and finding another party familiar with the difference who is in the area.  Based on everything you've described, it still sounds like a trunk.
tamás (2016-07-04 14:45:27+00:00): old_name:1921-1941 
ezt szerintem erre kellene javitani
old_name:1921-1951
Hjart (2015-08-15 14:20:20+00:00): No highway=* should overlap another highway=*. In this case instead a route relation should be used (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Routes
Hjart (2015-08-03 13:44:34+00:00): Vær venligst opmærksom på at forbinde veje korrekt (se pkt 5 i begynderguiden http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Beginners_Guide_1.3.1) Jeg har måttet fikse et par eksempler her.
AE35 (2015-08-21 08:21:24+00:00): Are U measuring the deep of the lake here?
You should not use highway=path tag for that.

Use "depth=XX-value" for that http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=depth
Allroads (2017-07-05 00:43:23+00:00): Hello, was looking how people tag sunrise sunset, why are all these tags on OSM, is that some where documented? What is the use?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29697884
sfn (2017-07-05 01:34:01+00:00): There is a wiki that explains the tags... for access:conditional see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access
Allroads (2017-07-05 10:25:17+00:00): All these:
massgis:ARTICLE97 1 
massgis:ASSESS_ACR 12.00000000 
massgis:ASSESS_BLK 17 
massgis:ASSESS_LOT 01 
etc.

These are not osm tags. Why are they in OSM? These are not documented I suppose.
sfn (2017-07-05 12:05:16+00:00): These are tags from the export from the state's database. See... https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MassGIS_Import_Tag_Cleanup_2013
Allroads (2017-07-05 13:13:44+00:00): Step 3,4,5, etc

So there are coming some clean ups.

Thanks for the info.
SK53 (2015-08-02 18:53:31+00:00): Excellent, the sort of thing only someone local might pick up. 

If you connect the two ends of the path to the roads (Ravenwood & Knowles Avenue) then this can also be used for pedestrian routing. Ask if you need specific advice how to do this (either here, OSM messaging or email: SK53 dot OSM at gmail.com)
Harald Hartmann (2015-08-05 07:29:54+00:00): Ist "Schönbrunn 7" wirklich der name des Mastes, oder sollte man das eher als ref taggen?
fred13 (2015-12-01 15:42:23+00:00): Hallo GCA,
there are partially two borders in Tunduma now. Could you please check & fix.
Thank you!
cRaIgalLAn (2015-12-02 11:01:08+00:00): Fixed. The original Anglo-German treaty that set the boundary during the Berlin Conference in 1884-1885 is not to be found online, so I used secondary data from the USA Department of State.
fred13 (2015-12-02 11:16:25+00:00): Great, thank you!
fred13 (2015-12-03 17:19:31+00:00): Seems like it was not everything OK and there was a problem with the relations of the border.. It was apparently fixed in this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/35724008
cRaIgalLAn (2015-12-03 17:39:16+00:00): Yes, I see that. Patching in a new piece led to accidentally damaging the relations. I am carefully adjusting the Kenya / Tanzania border and Kenya coast without ever breaking the line - I should have done that here ~~~~
maraf24 (2015-08-02 19:45:51+00:00): A może by tak chociaż jedno słowo komentarza? Np. "geometria".
Christian Janiesch (2015-08-02 19:22:43+00:00): Pfad hinzugefügt
ma-rt-in (2015-08-04 19:27:51+00:00): Warum verwendest du name als ref?
muede (2015-08-05 20:56:35+00:00): Tut mir leid, kann damit nichts anfangen, ist noch Neuland für mich
ma-rt-in (2015-08-06 06:33:55+00:00): Also. Name sollte wirklich nur als name benutz werden. OE3 ist für mich eher ein ref. Näheres dazu im wiki.
MCDA (2015-08-16 01:26:00+00:00): Why have you created another way for Roscor Bridge?
eggie (2022-06-06 11:44:04+00:00): Opnieuw Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
jaimemd (2015-08-13 06:13:47+00:00): Ich habe die Strecke Gramzow-Damme wieder von abandoned auf preserved geändert, da sie unverändert im Museumsbetrieb befahren wird.
streckenkundler (2015-08-13 16:13:41+00:00): Oh... hatte ich das tatsächlich auf abandoned gesetzt? Tatächlich... Sorry, war nicht beabsichtigt... Das muß unabsichtlich passiert sein, als ich Bahnhofsgleislage ergänzt und den BÜ der L 252 vervollständigt habe... Vier Augen sehen eben mehr als zwei...

Danke,

Sven
luschi (2015-08-25 19:27:33+00:00): Hallo,
die Wiki empfielt den Außbau einer Straße mit construction=minor zu taggen ohne highway=construction. Oder ist hier die B 31 gesperrt?
lg
q_un_go (2015-08-25 22:16:52+00:00): OK, die B 31 wird halt auch da dann von primary zu trunk, wenn es fertig ist
GP8 (2015-08-04 08:25:48+00:00): I am sorry for the mistake, only "Wasserwanderrastplatz Petkamsberg" is right, no additional camp.
BladeTC (2018-09-08 21:35:56+00:00): jpcrz, por favor, Não copiar dados do Google, principalmente nomes de ruas.
neuhausr (2015-08-03 15:48:12+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Wondering, is there a bike lane here? I don't see it on Hennepin Cty maps. If so, it should be tagged on the road way (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle)
gterrien (2015-08-04 15:20:44+00:00): https://www.bloomingtonmn.gov/sites/default/files/hiking_biking_map.pdf

Thanks! I don't think I am marking it as a bike lane correctly, so if you or anyone else wants to fix it, it would be much appreciated. Bloomington has a few other bike lanes on that map that aren't in OSM, either.
neuhausr (2015-08-04 15:50:19+00:00): It's not too bad, if you want to give it a go: when a "normal" (two-way) road like this has a bike lane on each side, you can just add cycleway=lane to the road way. You'd only create a separate highway=cycleway way if it is truly separated from the road.
user_6110846 (2018-04-21 09:56:55+00:00): Good Day Romanian Wikipedia deleted. More on the territory of Ukraine, do not add it - it's a garbage tag. Enough Ukrainian Wikipedia.
muralito (2015-11-13 15:33:37+00:00): Hola serock.

Tene cuidado con lo que marcas como oneway=yes, que no todo es como parece, porque sino dejás no ruteables o con opciones de caminos muy malas a ciertas partes del mapa. Por ejempo la colectora en el entorno de Blas Perera.

Gracias,
M.
joost schouppe (2015-09-22 10:52:20+00:00): estas seguro que este camino esta pavimentado? http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/119889347
5m4u9 (2015-09-22 13:40:26+00:00): Hmm... error mio creo en la semana lo corrijo. http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/bB2
joost schouppe (2015-09-22 13:49:33+00:00): ok. ya lo cambié
Totor (2015-08-06 06:01:06+00:00): Hi GOWin
I added the missing parts from GPS traces.
Happy Mapping,

Totor
GOwin (2015-08-06 06:36:54+00:00): Thanks Totor!
danieldegroot2 (2021-08-08 12:06:04+00:00): Hey Vijayotp,

We do not tag with name=School, unless we are sure the name is "School". This is a descriptive name and indicates the type of object, amenity=school

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Names_are_not_for_descriptions

Regard,

Daniel

PS: I'm aware this is an old changeset of yours.
yogi_ks (2015-08-14 10:01:16+00:00): There's already a city node - www.openstreetmap.org/node/3401391999
yogi_ks (2015-08-14 10:37:18+00:00): Please follow this - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_India#Naming_in_different_scripts_and_languages
while adding names.

But looks like this node is still duplicate because another place=city with Ballari exists - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/350617555. We should have either of them.
VictorIE (2017-09-16 20:07:47+00:00): This appears to be a duplicate of the river: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363692578
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072473 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072472 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
literan (2015-08-03 11:32:52+00:00): Здравствуйте! прошу вас не использовать на дорожках бесполезные теги bicycle=yes, horse=yes и т.п. - они описывают административный запрет или разрешение на перемещение (а у нас в России по умолчанию на всех дорожках можно и пешком, и на велосипеде, и на лошадях) - эти теги имеют смысл только если стоят какие-то запретительные знаки. Для описания ФИЗИЧЕСКОЙ возможности перемещения служат другие теги (surface=, smoothness=)

А ford=yes на всей дорожке - это вообще что? она вся идет по реке как брод? 

Я поправлю.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072471 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072470 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:46+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072469 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Mateusz Konieczny (2015-08-10 16:59:06+00:00): Is there any reason for deleting so many objects in this edit?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072468 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072466 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
maraf24 (2015-08-03 14:26:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/113803253
Tertiary? Tam jest strefa 30 a miejscami jest dość wąsko.
Zbigniew_Cz (2015-08-03 14:31:18+00:00): Słusznie, niepotrzebnie zasugerowałem się jej ładnym wyglądem na ortofoto...
kaporskaddress_bot (2015-08-04 19:10:53+00:00): Ahoj, čo má táto úprava znamenať? Vážne pochybujem, že to odráža skutočnosť. Prosím, zmaž tento nezmysel.
t_ja (2015-08-04 19:16:59+00:00): Hups, nejak sa mi prepol profil, teraz píšem z toho správneho :)
freeExec (2015-08-03 14:32:40+00:00): С каких снимков ты это нарисовал?
vint (2015-08-03 20:48:31+00:00): Эт с яндекса
freeExec (2015-08-03 20:52:52+00:00): Чего ты ещё с яндекса рисовал, чтобы уж сразу удалить всё?
vint (2015-08-04 20:50:51+00:00): я в основном с bingа рисую, mapbox иногда, в яндекс редко подглядываю, если сильно нужно, откачу что найду
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072465 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
GerdP (2015-10-07 08:18:46+00:00): maxspeed=sign should give a numerical value 
way 3726331,way 248793312,way 173806937,way 173806951,way 173806929
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072464 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
trigpoint (2015-08-03 10:42:08+00:00): Has the costa closed and become your office?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072462 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
4rch (2015-08-16 12:08:58+00:00): Warum hast du die beiden Teilstücke der Grenze gelöscht? Ich habe die Grenze äußerst gewissenhaft eingezeichnet. Hab die Löschung revertet.
user_2230854 (2015-08-16 13:33:16+00:00): War wohl ein Versehen, sorry.
4rch (2015-08-16 13:45:44+00:00): Danke, dachte ich mir schon fast. Gruß
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072460 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SK53 (2015-11-10 20:50:06+00:00): Hi, I'm just adding some more residential roads in Katsina city, and looking at Bing this one seems unpaved http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/363735160, but you tagged it as paved. Before changing the tag I wanted to check to see if you have more up-to-date information. 

Thanks,

SK53
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072459 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
4rch (2015-08-04 17:33:43+00:00): I've reverted this changset. Bing imagery is distorted in this area.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072458 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
romeodelta (2015-08-04 12:02:49+00:00): Je croyais qu'on ne devait pas mentionner les GR dans OSM.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072456 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072455 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
zimba (2015-08-04 15:49:40+00:00): Removed: Buildings should be mapped as polygons, and the generic name "Casa" doesn't add any value.
DaveF (2019-08-10 13:46:19+00:00): Hi
Should this sculpture have a NapTan code?
brianboru (2019-08-12 10:18:43+00:00): This was supplied by TfWM ( then Centro) and all the Interchange sculptures in the West Midlandss have  one
DaveF (2019-08-12 10:25:02+00:00): Good Lord, how ridiculous
DaveF (2019-08-12 10:35:44+00:00): Do you have a link to a list?
zimba (2015-08-04 15:50:06+00:00): Removed: again, buildings as polygons please, and not as points in the middle of the street.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072454 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072452 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072450 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072447 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072446 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072443 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072442 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072441 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072440 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072439 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072438 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:20:01+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072437 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:19:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072436 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
Maxime Résibois (2015-08-26 08:42:12+00:00): ?? Il ne s'agit pas d'un rail mais d'une voirie, sur quel critère vous êtes vous basé pour changer les attributs de cette voirie?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:19:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072435 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:19:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072434 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source
SomeoneElse_Revert (2015-09-16 22:19:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 34072432 where the changeset comment is: Reverted at request of author due to use of Google Maps as source