piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Frans S (2022-01-22 13:36:21+00:00): Hello. Thanks for mapping on this task.
I have a few remarks.
Please tag in according to the wiki guidelines as mentioned in the instruction.
The tag Track is to be used as connection of a settlement to agriculture land, wood or riverside.
Not as a through road, Unclassified or path are to be used depending on the width of a road. You can measure the width as followsL
Zoom in as far as possible and draw a line between the shoulders of a trace and click
ctr +shift+M to shows measurements
click on the line between the nodes and you get the width.

Dont add the  tag 'corssing' to a junction. Just be sure the roads are snapping together.
ps
on this webpage you see usefull shortcuts for iDeditor
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts
Best regards  and keep mapping
eggie (2022-01-26 14:41:25+00:00): Dag Paul Er wordt al weer gebouwd. 
Je zou een BAG import kunnen aanvragen via het forum in het draadje Verzoek BAG import
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12

MVG
eggie
danieldegroot2 (2022-04-24 19:25:25+00:00): Ok, mais il y a aussi
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116450840
Les changements sont ok? Je pense non.

Ref https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3013686
pour fermer..
Syl (2022-05-15 09:39:21+00:00): Bonjour, je ne sais pas ce qui est bon, je ne connais pas ce coin.
Dans ce groupe de modifications j'ai uniquement corrigé ce qui était forcément une erreur, le changement de nom de la relation.
C'est pour ça que j'ai laissé la note ouverte, pour laisser visible qu'il y a un problème.
SekeRob (2022-01-23 17:46:37+00:00): Hi,

Osmose is flagging 4 areas with "Untagged area object" at the newly mapped cantina, which have surface feature tags such as cobblestone but no key tag what the use of the area is. Mapping paved areas in OSM is a very grey zone outside highway and landuse type, nothing satisfactory I've come across.

ciao
kvjk (2022-01-24 19:57:21+00:00): Ova staza je potpuno neprohodna u prirodi i opasna za korištenje, stoga vaša promjena nije ispravna.

Linija je bila ucrtana kao disused kako je drugi nebi ucrtavali i za referencu u budućnosti.
bernardirfan (2022-01-29 09:46:03+00:00): Ubuduće neću ucrtavati staze uzimajući dgu.hr: HOK kao referencu, već vlastite oči, uz potvrdu očiju drugih izviđača.
Falsernet (2022-01-22 01:41:28+00:00): Also added park, playground, allotments, linked up Rylands Rec pathway. Changeset area is huge due to huge residential zone.
clay_c@wonder (2022-02-16 03:08:39+00:00): Hi,

It looks like you've completely ignored the comments I gave the last time you made this change. What is the reason for this edit war?

Previous discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113624904

Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117457720
clay_c (2022-02-16 03:09:16+00:00): (sorry, that should have been sent from this account, not my work account)
clay_c@wonder (2022-02-16 03:09:24+00:00): Previous discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113624904

Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117457720
clay_c@wonder (2022-02-16 03:09:27+00:00): Previous discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113624904

Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117457720
clay_c@wonder (2022-02-16 03:09:30+00:00): Previous discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113624904

Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117457720
DUGA (2022-09-05 14:36:33+00:00): Do not use whatever AI to map buildings of a place that you have never been to. These AI has no guarantee on the validity of the imagery and it only makes things worse.

If you are reluctant to draw buildings, either do an import following our guidelines on the wiki, or cease and desist.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023475222#map=19/40.13121/-76.84717
Trevor_1 (2022-01-22 01:58:18+00:00): There should be a comma after "edited roads"
kvjk (2022-01-22 09:45:55+00:00): Did you survey these trails in nature, are you sure they are usable??
bernardirfan (2022-01-24 12:12:00+00:00): Those trails are on the maps of the Državna geodetska uprava, Republika Hrvatska. If that government institution lies, than that is frightening.
bernardirfan (2022-01-24 12:13:56+00:00): Other trails with "fix me" request that are not of none of the reliable government maps, I will search with my own eyes.
bernardirfan (2022-01-24 12:14:49+00:00): "that are in none", sorry
kvjk (2022-01-24 19:44:23+00:00): Molim vas da pročitate dokumentaciju:
https://dgu.gov.hr/proizvodi-i-usluge/sluzbene-drzavne-karte-i-ostale-karte/hrvatska-osnovna-karta-175/175

"Hrvatska osnovna karta, prijašnjeg naziva Osnovna državna karta, izrađivala se od šezdesetih godina prošlog stoljeća (1954. god.) do 2009. godine"

Dakle podaci na Hrvatskoj osnovnoj karti mogu bit izrazito stari i potpuno neupotrebljivi u stvarnosti.

Također je važno uzeti u obzir: 
"Osnovni izvornik za izradu HOK-a je aerofotogrametrijsko snimanje krupnijeg mjerila, a podaci na karti su prikazani s minimalnim stupnjem generalizacije."

Živim na ovom području i izrazito dobro poznajem stanje na terenu.

Većina ovih staza su u potpunosti neprohodne, opasne za kretanje što može korisnike dovesti u po život opasne situacije! Radi se o izrazito zahtjevnom krškom terenu i gustoj vegetaciji - makiji.

Stoga smatram da je prije ucrtavanja u OSM potrebno utvrditi stanje na terenu na što ukazuje fixme=survey.

Staze sam označio kao disused:highway=path što je tag koji je namijenjen za upravo takve staze koje nisu upotrebljive.

Nadalje, kad sam u mogućnosti napravim terenski izvid(survey), maknem fixme tag i utvrđeno stanje prenesem u OSM.

Ukoliko se slažete, vratio bih ove promjene u prvobitno stanje te nadalje postupio po navedenom obrascu.
Također molim da navedeno uzmete u obzir pri daljnjim promjenama na području Učke i okolice.

Zahvaljujem na razumijevanju i lijep pozdrav.
bernardirfan (2022-01-29 09:32:33+00:00): Molim, vratite ove promjene u prvobitno stanje, kako ste predložili.
kvjk (2022-02-03 15:19:58+00:00): Ok, pozdrav.
clay_c@wonder (2022-02-16 03:09:33+00:00): Previous discussion here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/113624904

Reverted here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/117457720
pyrog (2022-12-16 13:43:04+00:00): Bonjour Hervé,

Les tags cantmapthatyet:route=hiking
et cantmapthatyet:type=route sont-ils une erreur de saisie ou ont-ils une signification particulière ?

C'est dans le Tour du Mont Lozère.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5869504

Cordialement,

Yves
pyrog (2022-12-16 13:45:06+00:00): Je viens de piger "Can't map that yet"  :D

Je les ai supprimés
Hervé TUC (2022-12-16 14:09:31+00:00): Bonjour,

Ok. C'était pour la blague ; j'avais tout mappé car c'est dispo sur le site du parc. Mais ça n'est pas sous licence libre par ailleurs donc j'ai dû le retirer, et je n'avais pas envie de juste tout supprimer.
Si tu l'as trouvé quelque part en licence libre tu peux le "rendre visible", sinon tu vas te faire taper sur les doigts 😄

A+
pyrog (2022-12-16 14:15:56+00:00): Quelqu'un avait déjà rajouté route=hiking 
et type=route donc c'était déjà visible 😅

Pour info j'ai rajouté un "moniteur" dans KPN : 

https://knooppuntnet.nl/en/monitor/groups/fr-nwn/routes/GR68/map?mode=comparison&reference=false&matches=true&deviations=true&osm-relation=true&selected-deviation=1&selected-osm-segment=0&position=44.47330786,3.77256395,18

On peut voir à Cubières un écart entre la trace gpx et OSM (qui suit le scan 25).
Hervé TUC (2022-12-16 14:22:53+00:00): Ah ok 🙃 

Je ne connaissais pas Knoopuntnet... Intéressant. Par contre, à Cubières, aucune idée de la réalité sur le terrain 🤷‍♂️
mueschel (2022-01-25 18:43:52+00:00): Hi,
you added three ways without any valid tags like this one, could you check that?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023480290
ZestyEel (2022-01-25 22:51:37+00:00): Mustve missed em. Fixed it, thank you!
mueschel (2022-01-29 13:23:32+00:00): There's one left: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023477879
ZestyEel (2022-01-31 13:21:48+00:00): got it!
mapper377 (2022-01-22 11:08:46+00:00): The "East River Road" in the changeset comment should be "East Ritter Street". The tower is east of the village of Seven Mile, OH.
MxxCon (2022-01-22 06:09:13+00:00): Hello.
Please do use meaningful changeset comments - “.” does not help other mappers understand what you are doing. You can also read about it in more details at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116453564
快乐的老鼠宝宝 (2022-01-22 12:37:15+00:00): 不要用111这种毫无意义的备注，不然别人不知道你做了什么，就可能给你整体删掉
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116453662
gpserror (2022-03-20 16:50:38+00:00): Hi, I think this aerodrome POI that was added here at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9438483221 is already mapped as an area at https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/368683795 .  It depends on the render whether it shows up as the proper name, so it's not necessary to tag it again here?
nevw (2022-01-22 07:21:01+00:00): Hi
road names are not abbreviated in OSM.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Naming_conventions
I have fixed your edits.
user_10360149 (2022-01-22 04:10:31+00:00): 使用如下Overpass语句

/*
This has been generated by the overpass-turbo wizard.
The original search was:
“"operator"="中国石化 Sinopec" global”
*/
[out:json][timeout:25];
// gather results
(
  // query part for: “operator="中国石化 Sinopec"”
  node["operator"="中国石化 Sinopec"];
  way["operator"="中国石化 Sinopec"];
  relation["operator"="中国石化 Sinopec"];
);
// print results
out body;
>;
out skel qt;
user_10360149 (2022-01-22 04:12:02+00:00): 对除了一个易捷便利店以外的其他加油站，全部移除operator，因为具体到地方的operator确实不一定知道。并对这部分加油站全部统一按照NSI中最新数据进行替换，name/brand 随从 name:zh/brand:zh，英文保持纯英文
AndrewS (2022-01-31 05:54:37+00:00): Hi, I'm interested in mapping power distribution networks and wondering what source you are using for many of the power line routes you are mapping. Thanks, Andrew
archpdx (2022-01-22 06:30:02+00:00): Hi and welcome to OpenStreetMap! Thanks for adding these golf holes - however note that names for golf holes are meant for named holes (eg 'Tea Olive'). The number you put in the 'Hole Number' field should be sufficient for this. You can read more about this here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:golf=hole

You can also read more about mapping golf courses here:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Golf_course
ovruni (2022-01-22 06:41:05+00:00): Hola Olenka9854, la etiqueta de nombre solamente debe de utilizarse en vías que tengan un nombre en particular, no para agregar descripciones. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Nombres#Los_nombres_no_son_para_descripciones
user_13980615 (2022-01-22 08:23:42+00:00): 东坡的索道因为有 Strava 热图上一条很直的线，所以很容易确认端点；此为西坡，之前只能确认山上起点就没有画，今天看到 https://m.tuniu.com/way/2551440/ 里的这两张照片（https://m.tuniucdn.com/fb2/t1/G4/M00/61/1C/Cii-VVnGBcWIG-y3AArI7yzIw7cAABhfQJYITgACskH715_w640_h480_c1_t0.JPG ，https://m.tuniucdn.com/fb2/t1/G4/M00/61/1C/Cii_J1nGBcaIEINuAAu-yina21QAABhfQKJRigAC77i305_w640_h480_c1_t0.JPG ）才知道西坡索道下去并不是直接到西山咀，而是另一座山上
olo81 (2022-02-16 00:11:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1579499786

To jest platforma przystankowa czy przystanek autobusowy? 
Błędne tagowanie!
olo81 (2022-03-29 03:47:06+00:00): Do poprawy tagowanie, to nie jest kołobrzeski rower miejski !
olo81 (2023-01-05 00:16:33+00:00): i kolejny babol 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6490088187
julcnx (2022-01-22 08:48:29+00:00): Hi Johnny, the tags are conflicting. If the access to the road is restricted due to gates, highway=service may be more appropriate. Otherwise if the road is not suitable to motor vehicles (motor_vehicle=no), it should be tagged as highway=path+motorcycle=yes or highway=footway if only suitable by foot. highway=unclassified is reserved for minor roads frequently used for through traffic or to reach a specific destination (hotel, temple, attraction…)
For more info, please refer to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Thailand#Rough_guidelines_for_minor_highway_tag_decision-making_.28useful_in_most_cases.29
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116455984
Johnny Carlsen (2022-01-22 13:34:56+00:00): The road is a great 2 lane asphalt road, but there is a barrier from where I entered that only allows pedestrians in, no motorcycles or cars.

I called it unclassified because I don't know if the barrier is permanent, or only during smoky season, and all other roads behind it were unclassified as well.

That said, I just realized that cars and motorbikes may be able to enter from another point, and have just removed that access tags and added the barrier instead.
rthik007 (2022-01-24 11:47:17+00:00): "Hi Agil Tribowo,
I have removed water way which is overlapping with residential road 
Kindly check with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/116537712.
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116456032
orthocircular (2022-01-23 08:55:18+00:00): Hi there, thank you for adding your business to Open Street Map! Please be aware that the description field is not used for advertising, but only to describe things that aren't obvious from the other tags. I've fixed this and other errors, like using a standardized address without abbreviations, using the dentist healthcare tags, and moving your POI to be inside the building instead of attached to it.

Please let me know if "Northeast State Highway 99W" isn't the best name for the street your business is on. Highways can have multiple names which makes addresses confusing, but in Openstreetmap we at least try to avoid abbreviations like "N Hwy 99W."

Thanks again!
DP24PH (2022-01-22 10:05:25+00:00): Due to wide changes as described, this changeset may encroach the following areas: Pangasinan, Southern Mainland Cagayan Valley, Central Luzon, NCR, CALABARZON, Mindoro Island, Marinduque, Romblon, Bicol Region, entire Visayas, Zamboanga Peninsula, Northern Mindanao, Northern and Central portions of Davao Region, CARAGA.

Likewise, the entire Luzon mainland, group of islands are hereby fixed in accordance to the acceptable Quality Control (QC) standards, along with most Philippine Highway Network (including misspelling corrections), Provincial Inter-Island Bus routes, select ports, LMWD pipeline specifications, duplicate POI merging.

Upcoming mapping of bus routes may come at the soonest time, and it is made possible with the collaboration from our partner OpenStreetMap Philippines and its widest Local Communities.


DP24
lefuturiste (2023-10-19 08:46:47+00:00): Why though ?
lefuturiste (2023-10-19 08:47:06+00:00): It's more accurate to have the main entity on a relation (with the wikidata ref).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:40+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Kovoschiz (2022-01-22 10:29:08+00:00): This is not needed as there's already `vehicle=no`. Pedestrians can still use it. You should fix the renderer to show this  to drivers.
Morten Lange (2023-02-04 12:47:40+00:00): Hei, jeg endret https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13705165
basert på https://gravferdtromso.no/Artikler/Vis/ArticleId/108/Sallir-seremonihus
eggie (2022-01-22 08:51:02+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
mueschel (2022-01-22 11:20:29+00:00): Hi,
I noticed that you used many tags here that are not used in other places. Please make sure you only use tags that are documented in the Wiki or are available as presets in your editor. This is the only way to make sure that every user and every application can make use of the data properly.

It seems that you are a group of people working together? Please make sure the leader of the effort is aware of the Organised Editing Guidelines of OSM:
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines
RobJN (2022-01-22 11:45:57+00:00): Just for completeness, it is worth noting here that there are other emails on the talk-gb mailing list that essentially disagree with this edit and point out that the "suburb" in addr:suburb should not be interpreted to literally mean "suburb". Instead the addr:suburb tag should be used for any settlement that appears on the address above the postal town. Furthermore addr:suburb is a globally accepted tag which is documented. This is not the case for addr:village. Just adding this here as the sole link to a single mailing list post might appear as if this edit is uncontested.
TrekClimbing (2022-01-22 14:07:05+00:00): It's true that this is contested either way (which is why I made the original edit also referred to). It's also true that addr:village is not documented on the wiki. However, usage of addr:suburb as a sole choice between street- and city-level worldwide is also not documented as far as I can see. Indeed, the addr:suburb page says: "If setting the suburb name is not necessary for solving disambiguation use other tags like addr:hamlet=*, addr:district=*, addr:subdistrict=*." That being said, I can understand the benefits of a catch-all tag for addressing purpose, but I don't think there's a consensus in the UK that addr:suburb is that tag.
Dave Venables (2022-01-22 09:39:38+00:00): Same chain as venues in Alvaston https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/429534418 and Stenson https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/114658390 in Derby and Kniveton near Ashbourne https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/667478430
Johnwhelan (2022-09-18 15:37:31+00:00): You appear to be mapping buildings twice.  Once a very narrow building inside another.  Have you tried the buildings_tool plugin in JOSM? It might cut a few errors.  JOSM can be run from USB stick.
dadavid (2022-01-26 14:33:06+00:00): Hallo, 
bist du sicher, dass dieser Laden kein shop=convenience ist (kleines Lebensmittelgeschäft, Spätverkauf, Tankstellenverkauf) sondern ein shop=mall (Einkaufszentrum) ist?
Viele Grüße
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/116457881
trial (2022-01-24 20:16:06+00:00): Bonjour, le but d'Osmose c'est de corriger, pas de faire taire Osmose. Exemple : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8435144533
Le nom devrait être Les Pommiers, Les POMMIERS c'est encore pire que l'import pourri initial 5LES POMMIERS)
trial (2022-01-24 20:17:33+00:00): Et merci de faire des modifications localisées, sinon la surveillance d'une zone devient impossible (décocher reuse changeset).
Max-Kritic (2022-01-24 20:19:24+00:00): Salut,

Je comptais repasser pour mettre Les Pommiers.
trial (2022-01-24 20:59:17+00:00): OK, il y en a d'autres.
Max-Kritic (2022-01-24 21:01:24+00:00): oui. Je connais. Osmose reviendra signaler aussi les mots avec MAJUSCULES qu'il reste pour les prochaines corrections.
trial (2022-01-24 21:26:05+00:00): Tu as raison de mémoire je pensais que c'était quand c'était tout en capitales mais en fait un mot tout en capitales suffit.
Andrea Musuruane (2022-01-23 13:04:27+00:00): Ciao. Continui a disegnare gli edifici in modo troppo grossolano. La sagoma degli edifici si disegna sul perimetro del tetto, in genere si ortogonalizza, e poi si sposta sulla base dell'edificio. Tu invece fai dei perimetri che comprendono spesso sia il tetto che la base (e a volte anche i cortili, come in questo caso https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1005891616), non li ortogonalizzati mai, e spesso comprendono più edifici (come in questo caso https://www.openstreetmap.org/way1023550215 dove un punto dell'edificio è anche in comune con la strada). Ciao, Andrea
dadavid (2022-01-25 13:36:11+00:00): Hallo, 
in OSM ist es nicht vorgesehen, im Tag "phone" mehrere Telefonnummern anzugeben (S. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:phone?uselang=de)
Alternativ kann man zu contact:phone zusätlich noch eine contact:mobile angeben, wenn die zweite Nummer eine Handynummer ist. Ansonsten sollte man sich für eine entscheiden.
VG
bergaufsee (2022-01-22 16:54:26+00:00): Wie kommst du auf die Idee die Baumaßnahme sei abgeschossen?
https://www.moz.de/lokales/falkensee/verkehr-potsdamer-strasse-in-falkensee-wohl-noch-monate-gesperrt-62050291.html
Bitte unterlasse solche Änderungen ohne Ortskenntnis! Wenn du der Meinung bist da könnte etwas veraltet sein setze bitte gern eine note, wenn darauf nicht reagiert werden sollte, kann immer noch gehandelt werden.
Ich werde diesen CS wieder revertieren.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Bernd
abrensch (2022-01-22 19:36:58+00:00): Na stand halt dran "Ende 2021" und steht ja jetzt auch wieder dran nach Deinem Revert. Immerhin eine kleine Spur zum Sachverhalt für Leute mit detektivischem Gespür. 

Besser wäre natürlich ein direkter Hinweis.

Gruss, Arndt
bergaufsee (2022-01-22 19:45:09+00:00): du hast das entscheidende "voraussichtlich" überlesen, wir leben in Deutschland ;)
zluuzki (2022-01-22 09:33:06+00:00): Why are you using hundreds of ways if you cound have used one?
jnaika (2022-01-22 17:35:57+00:00): Źródło Wisłoki w rzeczywistości ma miejsce znacznie wyżej
jarema90 (2022-01-22 18:35:34+00:00): Poprawiłem zgodnie z mapą BDOT10k
Tatfahren (2026-02-07 10:49:46+00:00): Gibt es bei euch tatsächlich öffentliche Container für jede Art von Glas (auch Fenster/Fahrzeugfenster-Glas)?

Ich vermute das hast du versehentlich eingetragen.

Wahrscheinlich nehmen die Container auch keine Metalldosen an, da diese meist Pfand haben und an entsprechenden Automaten abgegeben werden.

z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9439100116/history
Leo Slager (2022-01-22 12:02:52+00:00): Dag Toeternietoe,
Dat is niet een correcte manier van taggen.
manmade=watermill is correct.
Het type zou je kunnen toevoegen als volgt:
description=B4-windwatermill.
Verbeter je het zelf ?
Leo Slager (2022-01-22 21:18:17+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dwindmill

ik pas het even aan.
Sandal man (2022-01-27 13:15:02+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1023575851
Hi Mike you are drawing here 2 roads on top of each other, off course that is not correct.
old residential and your new cycle way.
You have to split the old one and edit the tags of that part.
Can you have a look into it?
Regards Jan
mapper377 (2022-01-22 11:14:09+00:00): In the changeset comment "Hamilton Cleves Road" should have been "Hamilton Cleves Pike (SR 128)".
SomeoneElse (2022-01-22 12:08:41+00:00): There are around 9 top-level NCN1s in the UK.  Some are superroutes, most (like this one) are not.  Many (like this one) have sub-relations.  A reorganisation would likely be beneficial.

The gaps I've filled in are mostly just "obvious gaps" where the gap had already been added to e.g. EV12 (which is contiguous with a lot of this NCN1).  I haven't added amy large sections unlikely to be part of NCN1 any more since https://www.sustrans.org.uk/about-us/paths-for-everyone/ happened - though I suspect that many parts of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9579 may need to be removed per the fixme tag on it.
SomeoneElse (2022-01-25 20:44:36+00:00): Here's the net change (in number of pieces in postgres) after this:

Change in relation components for NCN1_R3 9579
3c3
<    105
---
>    122
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9579
http://ra.osmsurround.org/analyzeMap?relationId=9579
noelbov (2022-01-22 14:01:05+00:00): Beste,

Is het fietspad langs de Paul Van Ostaijenlaan twee richting?
Volgens beelden van AIV Flanders is er precies aan de overkant nog een fietspad (dat nog niet is toegevoegd)
De op elkaar volgende wegsegmenten van de Abraham Hansroute en ook van fietsknooppuntroute 62-81 is aldaar niet in orde (2 onderbrekingen)

- noelbov
KurtEnKristel (2022-01-22 21:33:15+00:00): Aanpassingen gedaan