piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Piskvor (2017-07-21 21:51:47+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetmap, and thanks for the edits.

Please be careful with the roads - when you removed the "highway=primary" from this one, it was invisible for a while (it is fixed now, so no worries): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254514371

Cheers,
Piskvor
M!dgard (2017-07-31 08:56:12+00:00): Your changesets from this one up to and including #50418858 have been reverted in https://osm.org/changeset/50712764 because they are a blind import.
muralito (2017-07-20 20:10:54+00:00): Hola.
¿Ese puente que agregaste, deja pasar autos, y sirve para cruzar la cañada de  Gragorio Perez hacia el norte?
sabiusli (2017-07-20 22:42:24+00:00): Exacto, es relativamente nueva, se construyó este año. Ahora están en obra y estan construyendo la calle que comunicará  la avenida costanera con Salustio donde está punteado en rojo, pero falta para eso.
Piskvor (2017-07-21 21:39:04+00:00): Hello,
thanks for the new addition; however, it looked like the forest is also inside the pond. I corrected this by making a pond-shaped hole inside the forest (check https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon for the logic).

Cheers,
Piskvor
Piskvor (2017-07-21 21:47:02+00:00): Great, thanks :) I have corrected the river to a stream - this is not a large enough flow to be a river. BTW, do you know where it continues from Prostřední rybník?
☆Finvenkulo (2017-07-24 23:19:26+00:00): dopisanie "w Chorzowie" do nazwy ZOO jest trochę bezsensowne:
1. oficjalna nazwa to "Śląski Ogród Zoologiczny"
2. ZOO znajduje się w Parku Śląskim, który wprawdzie formalnie należy do Chorzowa, ale w rzeczywistości znajduje się pomiędzy Katowicami, Siemianowicami i Chorzowem
user_4493657 (2017-07-25 00:34:02+00:00): Dzięki za powiadomienie. Faktycznie dopisanie w Chorzowie było besensowne z mojej strony. 
Zoo teraz ma jak przedtem unikalną nazwę "Śląski Ogród Zoologiczny"
Peilscheibe (2017-07-23 16:02:11+00:00): Hi, you added a gate here into the street. Is this now completely closed to the traffic? What kind of gate is this? I'm asking because prior to this edit, it was allowed to drive from the commercial area southbound into the roundabout, but not from the roundabout north into the unclassified (reflected by the no-entry relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7329712 )
a3nm (2017-07-23 22:53:32+00:00): Hi, thanks for checking this! I'm an OSM noob so I hadn't noticed the no_entry restriction (also it wasn't rendered by OSMand). I'm not sure but I had the impression that I saw, in addition to the sign disallowing entry from the roundabout, a kind of block of concrete on the middle of the road which would make it impassable. I am not sure of this at all, however, so I'm also fine with reverting the change if you think it's safer. Thanks again for your feedback!
Peilscheibe (2017-07-24 14:37:44+00:00): Hi a3nm, that's similar to my observations, but I recognized the concrete barrier was just half the street width and allowed the outbound traffic.
As I had spontaneously no idea how to tag such a half barrier, I used the no-entry restriction which depicts the reality quiet good, imho, but it may be not very intuitive or recognizeable.
Maybe it could be a solution, to tag the barrier like barrier=block with access=yes and an additional description? The no-entry restriction would still exist. What do you think about this?
Best regards, P.
a3nm (2017-07-28 09:34:45+00:00): Hi Peilscheibe, what you are saying about the barrier matches my memories, so I think we agree about how the barrier is physically located. As for the question of how to tag the barrier, I don't have much OSM experience so I think your opinion carries more weight than mine... Maybe the best would be what you suggest, plus maybe tagging the way as one_way so that it is clear that it can only be traversed to go to the roundabout and not in the other direction? What do you think?
DustyOnTheRoad (2017-07-20 09:44:38+00:00): The bus stop to Pisa airport has been moved to Piazzale Montelungo
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-21 09:07:29+00:00): https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=646897#p646897
Myazyk (2018-07-30 19:15:07+00:00): 1. Не може бути дві залізничні станції з однаковою назвою Оржів
2. Не може бути залізнична станція на залізничному переїзді
rab (2017-07-20 19:53:22+00:00): only untagged nodes
M!dgard (2017-07-31 08:45:03+00:00): Your changesets from this one up to and including #50418874 have been reverted in https://osm.org/changeset/50712483 because they are a blind import.
n6hdn (2017-07-19 23:15:33+00:00): Correction:  "Ginger Lane"
karitotp (2017-07-20 04:39:33+00:00): The POI'S have been deleted, because according the satellite imagery were inconsistent.
Karito
oormilavinod (2017-07-24 07:29:24+00:00): hey techlady, great that you have been adding onto OSM. but you seem to have deleted a wiki data of a place -1073097184 and . could you please specify the reason. because the web seems to link the wiki data id tot he same place. have a nice day
techlady (2017-07-26 23:34:11+00:00): Hi, oormilavinod,
I'm not syre exactly what you're talking about: "a wiki data of a place" I'm not sure what that means. I was in San Pedro/San Marcos last year with good friends, so I know it pretty well. What is the mistake? Thanks!  --Charlotte Wolter.
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-20 06:53:56+00:00): هذه خارطة عامة. الرجاء عدم اضافة اماكن شخصية مثل منازل على الخارطة. بامكانك اضافة اماكن شخصية في هاتفك بدون تعديل للخارطة العامة عن طريق استعمال ميزة ال"إشارات المرجعية" في التطبيق. 

شكرا

Please stop adding personal places to the map. OpenStreetMap is a public map. If you want to save personal things, use the Maps.Me bookmark feature. Map edits should contain public points of interest only.
Fakaar (2017-07-21 12:46:08+00:00): I would like to thank you very much for your good handling. I see that many personal places are important because they belong to people who are active in society and are difficult to find, so this mapping service enables people to easily find them
SafwatHalaby (2017-07-21 15:30:41+00:00): That's good to know. I've been looking for feedback from people like you in the area. I would appreciate some information for the future.



When someone adds "بيت فلان", do you think it's usually important or usually not important for the public? Do you think there's a way to tell the difference between important places for active people,etc, and unimportant places where someone just wants to add their home?


The middle east is being flooded with houses that are not important to the public. We are seeing things like "بيت خالي" or "بيتنا القديم".
Fakaar (2017-07-21 21:14:36+00:00): There is a way to find out if these places are important or not important by asking them and knowing the details of the place to add, there are places added non-important, such as "empty house. And our old house and I have her places active
ZeLonewolf (2025-06-08 04:08:53+00:00): Thanks for a good laugh, 8 years later...
stevea (2025-06-08 22:13:18+00:00): I suppose that since Cody is now tagged boundary=census that Alta and Jackson Hole "should" be as well?  (And done, if so, I think).  Can anybody confirm or actually do or might Brian or I do so?
ZeLonewolf (2025-06-10 00:11:59+00:00): At the moment, the Cody relation doesn't even have a name tag, which is why it came up on my list.
CloCkWeRX (2017-07-20 06:00:04+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap :)

I changed this from a 'path' to a driveway, and added the houses either side.

You might like to add addresses on the individual houses instead of the driveway itself - that will make it show up in navigation apps and similar that use OSM.
muziriana (2017-07-24 07:27:18+00:00): HI thanks for improving osm, but looks like you are accidentally duplicating some roads, can you please review?
muziriana (2017-07-24 07:30:56+00:00): I deleted some duplicates, looks like there are more left.
nabetaro (2018-06-11 01:53:22+00:00): pathに変更するのは良いと思うのですが、国道ではあるようですので、ref=256 は入れておいてもよいのではないかと思いました。
caesium (2018-06-11 02:31:06+00:00): 国道256号の点線区間であるということを表現したいという気持ちはわたしもあるのですが、以前「refを付与するとpathに対する番号という解釈になってしまう」という意見もあって削除しました（noteに残しているのはそのためです）。
リレーションで表現するという方法もありますが、そのあたりは厳密には決まってなかったと思います。
nabetaro (2018-06-11 03:14:37+00:00): なるほど。pathが国道なのだからそのpathにrefを付加するように感じていましたが、理由があることでしたか。
であればリレーションで表現するのが良さそうですね。
caesium (2018-06-11 08:48:19+00:00): ちょうど近所にいい例が。三遠南信道の矢筈トンネルはmoterwayとしてはref=E69で、trunkとしてはref=474になるのですが、こういう場合、wayは（高速道路ナンバリングされる前から）現実に合ったもの（自動車専用道路）でマッピングし、両立させるにはリレーションで表現するという議論で落ち着いていたはずです。

ただ今回の場合、単純にpathのwayへtrunk+ref=256のリレーションを追加しちゃうと、たしかレンダリングされるときに強いほうを選んじゃうこともあるようで、ちょっと悩ましいです、、、
nabetaro (2018-06-11 10:19:21+00:00): このコメントに気が付かず、すでに作成済みの国道256号のリレーションに、国道256号全体を追加してしまいました。
ただ、このリレーションにtrunkがついていないようで、強い方になるのは避けられているみたいです。
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 17:00:24+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:59:23+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:56:34+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
eggie (2017-07-20 05:53:35+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:59:01+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:54:40+00:00): Hi asmazhr, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 17:00:37+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 17:00:46+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:59:37+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 17:00:10+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:57:31+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:58:25+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
GerdP (2017-09-17 07:37:42+00:00): Hi!
Please review this bride. See 
https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4309
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 17:01:41+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:55:43+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 17:01:29+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:56:18+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:59:59+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 17:01:52+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:58:49+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pavani_03 (2019-04-02 10:57:31+00:00): Hi  restudyah,

Trust you are well. While reviewing the road network in Bandung, I have come across ways
""way 508856838
way 508856839
way 508856844
way 508856842
way 508856843"" classified as 'UnClassified'. However, going by the aerial imagery and other ways around, this seems to be 'Residential'.
Please look into this and share your observations


Thanks in advance.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:56:00+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:56:50+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:58:37+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:57:51+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:57:42+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:57:04+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
Supaplex (2017-10-01 14:30:56+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 17:01:13+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 17:01:01+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
DD1GJ (2017-07-20 06:43:22+00:00): Hallo masse77, willkommen bei OpenStreetMap. Was hattest Du vor? Da durch Deine Löschungen sehr große Kollateralschäden entstanden sind, habe ich alles rückgängig gemacht. Der von Dir verwendete Anfänger-Editor iD ist für Arbeiten an einer so komplexen Kreuzung ungeeignet. Verwende bitte JOSM und arbeite Dich gründlich ein: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:57:19+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:58:13+00:00): Hi WillCoulter, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
Gumeg (2017-10-24 07:37:57+00:00): Добрый день!
Вы зачем поменяли название у деревни Чардым? Видимо перепутали с личными метками?
pitscheplatsch (2017-07-20 16:53:49+00:00): Hi asmazhr, is this import discussed somehow/somewhere? Can't find/see any information. Thanks.
Supaplex (2017-10-01 14:31:55+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Zbigniew_Cz (2017-07-22 22:33:46+00:00): Stare nazwy ulic przenosimy do old_name=
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=656069#p656069
Pozdrawiam
katpatuka (2021-03-16 08:29:24+00:00): Hi FreedSky ;)

If you've got some spare time can you gave a look at 岳塘区 subarea relations? Two areas are broken, some seem to be old or merged with other areas. zhwiki shows 11 街道 and one 镇 while http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2020/43/03/430304.html lists 9 街道。。。

Also 雨湖区 needs an update 3 old 街道 and one new 街道。。。
Andrea Del Sarto (2018-04-25 17:25:56+00:00): salve,
in relazione a questo gruppo di modifiche, sono stati aggiunti molti nodi senza tag (es https://keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=143&error=86029043);
che cosa sono?
Gh0stz0x (2018-04-25 19:43:10+00:00): Ciao Andrea Del Sarto, probabilmente è JOSM che aggiunge nodi sovrapposti senza way collegate. È capitato anche a me su vecchie versioni, il problema e capire se è JOSM stesso o qualche plug-in che crea questi nodi. Ora non resta che cancellare i nodi sovrapposti... 😄
oormilavinod (2017-07-26 06:37:47+00:00): 
hey Iñi_Rod_Inz, welcome to OSM.  i appreciate your interest in mapping.  I have noticed that you have added a node to represent a park. but according to conventions, we trace a way along the park. keep adding to the map. Happy mapping !!
Nakaner (2017-08-22 16:04:25+00:00): Hallo q_un_go,

ist das ein Mappingfehler oder hat das einen höheren Sinn? https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4982101255 sowie der Node direkt daneben

Viele Grüße

Michael
q_un_go (2017-08-22 19:10:51+00:00): Mappingfehler. 
Grüße
Winfried
literan (2017-07-20 10:26:46+00:00): reverted again, fake edits (lock gates and shops selling doors everywhere)
mavl (2017-07-21 10:12:56+00:00): Hello Pleabargain. Thank you so much for adding data to OpenStreetMap. The contributors write [1,2,3,4] that you add the nonexistent data. Probably, you use the program (OsmAnd+) incorrectly. Please, understand the problem and check up your style of work with this program. Please, use correct tags for objects.  
  
1. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50374558  
2. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/47333252  
3. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49635176  
4. http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49793074  
  
Vladimir Marshinin  
Data Working Group
DD1GJ (2017-07-20 08:53:14+00:00): Hallo, danke für die Korrektur, aber darf der Plan auch für OSM verwendet werden (Urheberrecht)? Normalerweise schauen wir vor Ort auf de Straßenschilder, verwenden gemeinfreie öffentliche Bekanntmachungen oder https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW
Kirschblüte (2017-07-20 09:27:24+00:00): Wieso sollte es nicht möglich sein? Sonst würden die uns die Informationen doch auch nicht zur Verfügung stellen. Wobei wir den Plan erst daraufhin angefordert haben, nachdem einer unserer Mitarbeiter mitgeteilt hat, dass dort eine neue Straße bzw. Umbennenung ist.
DD1GJ (2017-07-21 05:45:53+00:00): Wenn die Gemeinde auf Nachfrage eine Auskunft erteilt, dann ist es ok, Ein aussagekräftiger Kommentar wäre "lt. Auskunft der Gemeine auf Nachfrage"

Es gab in der Vergangenheit leider bereits Fälle, wo allgemein von geschützten Stadtplänen incl. der vorhandenen Fehler abgezeichnet wurde, was Beschwerden der Rechteinhaber zur Folge hatte.
Kirschblüte (2017-07-21 08:52:35+00:00): Guten Morgen, verstehe ich. Natürlich sind auch wir vor Fehlern nicht sicher. Ich werde mich in Zukunft bemühen zu den Veränderungen liebevollere Kommentare zu schreiben :) Danke
ajashton (2017-07-21 20:56:31+00:00): Hi! What is the source for your change to Capital University? It now includes some commercial-looking areas as well as a church and Bexley city hall, which doesn't seem quite right.

Also Drexel Avenue got disconnected from Main Street - is that intentional?
literan (2017-07-20 11:03:01+00:00): читайте матчасть https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:shop=second%20hand?uselang=ru - вашу правку откатываю. Одежный секонд-хэнд обозначается как shop=clothes+second_hand=only. И еще - на сайте у вас написано "Комиссионный магазин «Kupy-Prodai»" - как на самом деле называется магазин (меня интересует не то, что написано на рекламе над входом, а именно название магазина)?
SHARCRASH (2017-11-09 14:33:57+00:00): Hi, what is the point of creating ways without connecting them? I'm astonished since you are registered in OSM for quite a long time. There are third party routing services that use the processes of ways to establish direction...
JamesKingdom (2017-07-22 20:54:01+00:00): Hi,
It appears you are having some problems mapping this building, please can you fix this?
JaysonOlivera (2017-07-25 06:11:28+00:00): Hello, this change to Central Michigan's University campus is incorrect and intersects current business zones. This change covers more land than CMU's campus holds and I'm going to revert this change manually.
SHARCRASH (2017-08-18 20:48:05+00:00): Hello! You degraded many elements! I understand it's not easy but you have to check the beginner's guide and the OSM's wiki to make sure you are using properly all elements and their tags. I will correct them. Nevertheless, here are the errors you did:
- you had made this way as a cycleway whereas it's a footway where cycling is permitted, you have to check how the highways are tagged along the access tags. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/180321136
- the corner (node element) of this grass area has been displaced and isn't anymore faithful to reality https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2866096157/
- this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367420592 has been connected here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3022768329/ which is clearly a mistake, be careful when you interact with node elements, way elements or area elements!
Also writing down "MTB project" as a changeset comment is not helpful at all. You have to comment about your changes, not about what is it for you personally.
MKnight (2017-07-20 11:09:36+00:00): Moin, Du hast an der Ausfahrt 21 zusammenhängende Strassen getrennt, wurde da neu gebaut oder gibt es einen anderen Grund?
MKnight (2017-07-20 11:17:31+00:00): Oh, nochmal geschaut, Du trennst zwischen motorway und primary. 
Hab nix gesagt.
kreuzschnabel (2018-05-28 08:50:41+00:00): In dieser Änderung wurde Relation 1590750 auf only_straight_on umgebaut und damit auch das Linksabbiegen auf die Rampe zur A 39 in Südrichtung unterbunden. War das ernst gemeint? Ich baue die Kreuzung mal um, weil sie in der Zusammenführung der getrennten Ways in einem Knoten auch zu steile Rechtsabbiegewinkel hat, und nehme das Linksabbiegeverbot dabei raus, bis mir bestätigt wird, dass es dauerhaft existiert (was ich mir kaum vorstellen kann).
kreuzschnabel (2018-05-28 09:04:57+00:00): Ich muss zurückrudern, laut Mapillary darf man da tatsächlich von Westen kommend nicht links auf die A 39 Ri. Braunschweig abbiegen. Na dann :)
schubbi (2018-05-28 11:50:48+00:00): ;-)
eggie (2017-07-20 10:07:23+00:00): PB met welkom gestuurd ...

Bungelowpark De Parel bevindt zich toch niet op dit kruispunt?

MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om evt. vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging verantwoordelijk voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
eggie (2017-07-20 10:20:06+00:00): naar juiste locatie gesleept en als chalet getagd.
frodrigo (2018-08-07 13:35:43+00:00): Vous avez ajouté un plan incliné de mise à l'eau.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50426514#map=19/44.25923/0.25687
Il y en a vraiment un ?
scai (2017-07-21 18:19:12+00:00): amenity=parking_space (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/508934526) sollte für einzelne Parkplätze verwendet werden. In deinem Fall wäre amenity=parking besser.
scai (2017-07-24 20:30:55+00:00): Ich habs mal korrigiert.
Firefishy (2017-07-20 12:37:23+00:00): Awesome First edits! Happy mapping. Keep it up ;-) - Grant
wwweg (2017-07-22 17:20:59+00:00): Warum hast du einige Straßen gelöscht und dann wieder neu gezeichnet?
Und warum achtest du immer noch nicht auf die Prüfergebnisse, die JOSM ausgeben kann?
Ich habe jetzt einige nicht verbundene Wege korrigiert, außerdem habe ich einige gemeinsame Punkte von Landflächen und Straßen getrennt.

Bitte sei in Zukunft gewissenhafter und überprüfe die Daten vor dem Hochladen. Solltest du irgendwelche Fragen haben, so stell diese.
OF0 (2017-07-23 17:00:42+00:00): wwweg schrieb: [....] außerdem habe ich einige gemeinsame Punkte von Landflächen und Straßen getrennt. [....]

Dies wäre nicht notwendig gewesen:

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Areas_and_Ways_Sharing_Nodes
wochenblatt (2017-07-24 08:46:37+00:00): Hallo, die Matheisstraße (habe ich gezeichnet) war im JOSM als Schrönghamerstr. drin. Da sich die Schrönghamerstr. durch den ganzen Ort zieht, musste ich die komplette Straße löschen und dann zwei neue zeichnen, nämlich Matheisstr und Schrönghamerstr. Es ist dann nur logisch, dass ich dadurch auch Gebietsgrenzen berühren muss (die Straße verläuft von oben nach unten) Also was hätte ich tun müssen? Was sind Prüfergebnisse von JOSM??????