piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
Max-Kritic (2020-06-09 20:32:17+00:00): C'est cela. Osmose t'indique tes erreurs d'encodage principalement pour l'encodage des numéros de rue. Les autres mappeurs devront repasser derrière toi pour corriger.

Connais-tu la relation https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Relation:associatedStreet ?

Exemple pour la Rue de Griny à Arras https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3533819#map=16/50.2836/2.7682

Le 72 est enregistré maintenant en doublon : une fois en façade de rue (moi) et une fois au centre du polygone voir https://osm.org/go/0BfqL4n2d?m=

Pour les zones urbaines, il faut mieux préférer faire des numéros en façade que de mettre 2 numéros sur un bâtiment à l'angle de 2 rues.


voir aussi http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=2.41909&lat=50.37935&zoom=9&opacity=0.68
mrousse83 (2020-06-09 20:56:06+00:00): Bonsoir,

Merci pour tous ces renseignements, je vais me documenter afin de travailler de manière plus efficiente.

Bonne soirée.
joost schouppe (2020-06-10 13:58:41+00:00): Dit stukje is inmiddels hersteld door Jakka, zie https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/549966820/history#map=19/50.95389/5.66351&layers=CN
Is het hier effectief de bedoeling dat fietsers die uit het oosten komen dit stukje in tegenrichting doen? Het is nu ingetekend zodat wie van oost naar west gaat langs onder rijdt, en wie van west naar oost gaat langs boven. Als het ene niet correct is, wellicht het andere ook niet. Ofwel: het onderste stukje is dan dus GEEN deel van de fietsroute, en het bovenste is deel van de fietsroute in beide richtingen?
Carto'Cité (2020-07-15 13:24:26+00:00): Salut,
Pour le chaucidou il faut ajouter lanes=1 sinon c'est comme de simple bande cyclables ;) C'est fait :)
À bientôt.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
user_5359 (2020-06-11 05:10:24+00:00): Hello! You add different ways with the key "]", see http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/UXB. Could you please check this?
Mel_1 (2020-06-11 15:44:29+00:00):  Thank you for pointing this out to me. It has now been corrected.
user_2066394 (2020-06-09 16:13:40+00:00): warum löschen? vorübergehend mit disused: markieren, es wird sich ja dann eine neue nutzung ergeben?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86414757
mtmail (2020-06-09 16:32:26+00:00): Gute Idee, habe ich angepasst. Vielen Dank.
PPete2 (2025-06-20 10:21:37+00:00): Hallo, du hast im Bereich Enns Abschnitt des "Martinuswegs" hinzugefügt, für den es vorort keine Beschilderung gibt. Was war deine Quelle dafür? Gibt es vielleicht Anzeichen dafür, dass sich dessen Verlauf inzwischen in Enns geändert hat?
PPete2 (2025-06-20 10:27:45+00:00): siehe dazu auch: https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4804548
schoka (2025-06-20 18:23:53+00:00): Hallo PPete2, vor vielen Jahren habe ich den Martinusweg über die freigegeben GPX-files https://martinuswege.eu/wegverlauf-route-details.php?kategorie=Hauptweg&id=115&start= nachgezeichnet. 
Falls sich mittlerweile etwas geändert hat, spricht nichts dagegen, den Weg zu aktualisieren. Schau mal, ob sich auch die GPS-Datei geändert hat.
rojjodo (2021-06-10 15:57:31+00:00): Hi, I walked the path to the bridge and it is still tilted. I spoke to a local who said it has been tilted for at least nine years that she knew. Judging by the wear on the path, the bridge is still heavily used and I suspect is not unsafe, but needs to be used with caution especially when wet. I would like to set the tag back to foot=yes and add a warning about using the bridge with caution, but I don't know a sensible way of tagging this. Did you raise an issue with Essex CC on this? There is nothing showing on their tracking page <https://www.essexhighways.org/track-it>. If not, I will raise it and see what they say.
Regards
Bob Dean
eggie (2020-06-09 16:02:20+00:00): Dag queztor,

De brug heb ik even aangepast naar de BGT en een verbinding gemaakt dmv een footway zodat het routeert
MVG,
Eggie
voschix (2020-09-24 12:49:43+00:00): What is "viabilità Firenze Sud" ? 
What is "Bypass Gavinana" ?
Can't find any reference on the web for either of the two.
lorec10 (2020-09-24 13:29:13+00:00): tracks that I propose for bypasses in the area south of Florence.
sorcrosc (2020-09-25 16:57:46+00:00): Ho eliminato tutto
woodpeck (2020-06-10 06:53:00+00:00): Dear user numide, please urgently explain why you deleted Arabic names from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/547968088/history. As you are probably aware, a number of vandals have made similar edits in the recent past. You have also touched a number of other objects that were subject to that same edit war. What is your relation to the accounts jatoca, wixomi, vereka, wocefen, xogoce?
Carto'Cité (2020-07-15 10:31:53+00:00): Bonjour Furdrien,
Je me permets de contacter parce que sur certaines contribution comme celle-ci tu as tendance à supprimer des objets pour les remplacer par une nouvelle version. Par exemple tu as remplacé https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/525611706 par https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/814259718 alors que c'est la même piste ; tu peux essayer de regarder ici pour mieux voir même si ce n'est pas évident : https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=86415909
Ne prends pas ça comme une critique, je sais que parfois ça semble plus simple de supprimer et refaire, j'ai aussi eu ces pratiques dans le passé et avec l'éditeur iD c'est plus simple. Seulement c'est contraire aux règles avec comme principale raison le fait de perdre l'historique et je pense qu'il y a d'autres bonnes raisons. Si tu souhaites contribuer plus facilement sur les aménagements cyclables sans avoir à les supprimer, je te conseille de regarder JOSM qui est beaucoup plus puissant pour contribuer que iD. Si tu as besoin d'aide n'hésite pas.
Je vais restaurer la version avec l'historique et essayer de corriger ça. Tu me diras si tu vois des erreurs.
À bientôt.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #CartoVeloIdF
Carto'Cité (2020-07-15 10:34:28+00:00): Cette modification a aussi cassé la jonction avec ce chemin : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/68452620#map=18/48.81161/1.96496
Je la restaure aussi mais si tu connais bien le terrain et qu'elle n'existe pas ou plus, tu pourras la recréer. Le commentaire de changeset est aussi super important pour dire ce genre de choses.
Bonne contributions.
Charles
Carto'Cité (2020-07-15 11:29:03+00:00): J'ai aussi transformé la piste cyclable en voie verte. C'est une bonne chose de préciser si les piétons ont accès aux aménagements et s'il sont séparé explicitement des cyclistes (segregated=yes/no). Pour cet aménagement il y a de nombreux panneau voie verte (
highway=path + bicycle=designated + 
foot=designated + traffic_sign=FR:C115) comme sur cette photo : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=Kvcmbpa9ChNulciJRkTvdQ ; https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=tJrXXKAoo4ZslqfatWs-jg
Charles
felipeeugenio (2020-06-09 18:32:04+00:00): portón agregado
syntex (2020-06-10 10:22:14+00:00): why?
user_177389 (2020-06-10 10:31:47+00:00): Nodes are a point feature, subareas must be area relations.
This is described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:boundary#Relation_members

Regards,
Mario
mueschel (2020-06-10 08:40:52+00:00): Hi,
what is the precise source of this data? Did you go to each of the 2000 towers yourself? Please make sure the data is available under a license compatible with ODbL!

Btw, there is a node without valid tags:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7606228206
Osmapas (2020-06-10 12:02:42+00:00): Hello, 
About the changesets https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86416935
All data were provided by the company responsible for the energy supply in the region 
and the form of mapping is necessary to consult the codes.
mueschel (2020-06-10 12:48:56+00:00): So you imported this from an external source. Please have a look to our import guidelines:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
eggie (2020-06-09 18:36:10+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
Kovoschiz (2020-06-09 16:18:51+00:00): Again, you are piling up your errors. Route 8 begins at North Lantau Highway, and `=motorway_link` is used.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/86417366
Kovoschiz (2020-06-09 16:21:44+00:00): After crossing the bridge
Free gems 8 (2020-06-09 16:23:45+00:00): Yes, but refer to my eyes, I see 0.0 sign at the bridge, very close to airport road. That means route 8 starts there.
Free gems 8 (2020-06-09 16:25:20+00:00): I am just confusing about why route 8 ends before reaching the bridge but the sign shows me there are still 400meter left before the reaching the end of airport road.
Kovoschiz (2020-06-09 16:27:55+00:00): Refer to your edits, both carraigeways should be tagged with `ref=8`. That's why edits need to be consistent.
Free gems 8 (2020-06-09 16:28:01+00:00): Also, seems the link for the airport road is too long... some of them should be motorroad instead link of route 8...just like Ma On Shan Rd.
Kovoschiz (2020-06-09 16:29:21+00:00): They aren't. Please check Ma On Shan Rd carefully.
Free gems 8 (2020-06-09 16:30:04+00:00): As I haven't understand all tags of highways, maybe my edits always wrong. Again, thanks for your reminder.
Free gems 8 (2020-06-09 16:32:17+00:00): I'm just thinking, Is airport Rd is a separte road like ma on shan road? or a link road? because you tell me Ma on shan rd is a separate motorroad.
Kovoschiz (2020-06-09 16:37:06+00:00): Please don't simply say "maybe my edits always wrong." and continue with them. Tthese significant, widespread edits can be asked and discussed in the community; especially from a fresh, unfamiliar editor.
Free gems 8 (2020-06-09 16:40:54+00:00): hey, tell me, where is the community? on fandom? twitter? telegram? or discord?
🗺🗺🗺 (2020-06-10 14:28:51+00:00): Note that "Expressway" and "Hong Kong Strategic Route" are two different concepts. The former, together with "Tunnel Areas" are tagged with `highway=motorway` (or `highway=motorway_link` for slip roads). The latter that do not belong any Expressway are tagged with `highway=trunk` (or `highway=trunk_link` for slip roads). As per community consensus, link roads should bare the higher category tag. Thus, the sections of Airport Road before meeting non-Expressway traffic, are tagged with `highway=motorway_link`.
🗺🗺🗺 (2020-06-10 14:29:02+00:00): Westbound:
Legally, the Expressway ends at the "Expressway Ends" sign, which is located a few metres before the last gantry before the bridge. The sign depicting "Route 8 ends" is located a few metres after that gantry, despite the distance marker sign for Route 8 can still be found on the bridge and "0.0" refers to where the bridge ends.
🗺🗺🗺 (2020-06-10 14:29:09+00:00): Eastbound:
Legally, the Expressway starts at the "Expressway Starts" sign, which is located some 10 metres after the end of the bridge. There are no signs explicitly denoting "Route 8 starts", but distance marker sign for "0.0" can be found where the bridge starts.
Frans S (2020-06-11 15:12:28+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here
A remark about your mapping here.
You mapped 2 objects as a building.
Did you see any shadow which proof that the objects are above ground level?
They don't ,To me it seems dry ponds or something like that. I removed the mappings.
Best regards  and keep mapping
mueschel (2020-06-13 09:25:00+00:00): Hi,
what do you mean by these tags?

maasurement source	
maeasurement source	
measurement source

Please note that Google is not an allowed source for any edits in OSM - their license is incompatible with ours.
user_8334278 (2020-06-13 13:32:37+00:00): you have to see the other discussions to follow, in that they questioned the with of the stream, and i went back and measured with the tool on google maps. i was at the rivers edge before.
mueschel (2020-06-13 13:48:26+00:00): I reverted this changeset - it's not allowed to copy any information from Google maps.
pio2_122 (2020-06-09 16:58:27+00:00): Już pisałem, że nie trzeba dodawać adresów do poszczególnych POI w budynkach z adresami, bo to po prostu dublowanie...
ivanbranco (2024-01-10 19:28:10+00:00): Ciao hindukusc,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/814275799/history

qua hai utilizzato un valore di surface non valido, per convenzione si utilizzano i valori in inglese segnalati nella wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:surface

riusciresti a correggerlo? qua sono segnalati altri valori da correggere: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/42572
SomeoneElse (2020-06-09 21:06:31+00:00): Hello jdd 3,

Could you please try and add a little more detail to your changeset discussion comments?  Here you've said that it is a "correction" but it would really help other mappers to know a little bit more about it.  I'm guessing based on the "check_date=june 8 2020" on that it's based on local survey, but that's best placed in the changeset comment.

One mre thing - what actually is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10794330 ?  It now seems to be two separate ponds through which the north branch of the Chicago River flows, but I don;t understand why they are joined together to form one multipolygon?

Best Regards,

Andy
user_8334278 (2020-06-10 03:12:46+00:00): on the same map i made several saves, it was a correction from another comment i received where i was correcting what was on the comment, there were 2 ponds not 3 that was river bank that turned into a pond that linked to the golf course that was river area that was not due to the dam.and to break up the pologon.
Free gems 8 (2020-06-12 20:29:06+00:00): yes, just like this road. You have changed it.
Vinber (2020-06-10 12:04:15+00:00): Bonjour et bienvenue dans OpenStreetMap,

un petit mot ici pour faciliter votre arrivée : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:WikiProject_France/bienvenue

Cas particulier / Si vous êtes en seconde, en cours de SNT, veuillez faire suivre à votre enseignant-e le lien suivant https://dane.ac-lyon.fr/spip/spip.php?article628 (par avance merci !).


Dans tous les cas, n'hésitez pas à répondre, poser des questions, ...

Vincent

PS : 2 liens souvent utiles : 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#N.27utilisez_pas_de_tag_name_pour_d.C3.A9crire_des_choses.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bonnes_pratiques#Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
Vinber (2020-06-10 12:06:24+00:00): Concernant les noms, ce type de pratique (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/587872811#map=19/45.27572/-0.40454) est à éviter. Pour Non fini, vous pouvez utiliser par exemple building=construction.
pour à vendre et à louer c'est à réfléchir mais ce n'est pas le nom de la maison non plus !
Chez Manu ?
Au plaisir d'échanger
Shireibu (2020-06-28 22:16:40+00:00): Ой, спасибо за фикс, я накосячил с границами.
osmviborg (2020-06-10 06:48:29+00:00): Hej. Her har du lavet en klassisk begynderfejl. Inden du tilføjer cykelstier, så kontroller om stierne i forvejen et tagget på selve landevejen, det er de her som 'cycleway=track'. Nu er der to sæt cykelstier. Ét af sættene skal slettes.
Dino Michelini (2020-11-25 15:04:40+00:00): Ciao, ti segnalo che le relation riportano info non conformi con quanto stabilito nella pagina CAI della wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CAI) ad es. "name"; per favore puoi fare le dovute correzioni? Grazie
aceman444 (2020-08-08 22:20:52+00:00): Hi, please do not remove addr:conscriptionnumber from buildings.
user_8334278 (2020-06-10 03:21:20+00:00): changed road to golf cart path.
LeonVero (2021-03-21 15:52:55+00:00): Bonjour,
what about https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/629303843/history on other basins?
Jordi MF (2020-06-17 09:28:56+00:00): Hola,
He corregido las paradas de autobús porque no tienen que mapearse encima de la calle. Los nodos deben colocarse en el lugar donde los peatones esperan, es decir, en la acera. Existe otra etiqueta par indicar el lugar en el que se detiene el autobús encima de la vía (calzada).
Saludos,
Jordi
enterprise1995 (2020-06-13 12:14:19+00:00): Sieht gut aus.
jemily1 (2020-08-18 21:25:09+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/803902203  - acabo de ver aquí que un usuario ha señalizado con un área una zona de carga y descarga, y ,si te parece bien, hacerlo aquí también en mis ediciones - en todo este pueblo también he visto que los carriles de aparcamiento de las calles también están hechos con áreas ¿ lo hago también en mis ediciones para no tener que cortar en tramos cada calle?
eggie (2020-06-15 11:20:36+00:00): Nu edits in Nederland daarom .......Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
MVG,
Eggie
AkuAnakTimur (2020-06-10 15:42:37+00:00): Hi, I've seen some changes made for way 814291776: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/814291776.

I've taken a photo tagged with coordinates: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Somewhere_near_state_road_K144.jpg which is around https://osm.org/go/4Go52LwoR?m=&way=782854562 - in which made edits _just_ a few months back (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/82409528)

I would like to know some reasons behind the re-classification.

One more thing, please update your tags when making any edits because "source=ground truth December 2019" doesn't actually reflect your remote mapping effort.
AkuAnakTimur (2020-06-10 15:49:29+00:00): Hopefully your team would somehow take an extra effort to dig around edits (⌘+H or equivalent to check out editing history): so that ground truth coming from (unpaid) hobbyist mappers is replaced by (could be so errorneous) extrapolated data especially coming from imageries.
AquaticArmadillo (2020-06-10 23:04:22+00:00): Thank you for reaching out, AkuAnakTimur. I changed https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/814291776  to residential because it accesses houses near https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/5.894021001469327/100.42322011039344. I also wanted to make the road network in the area more consistent, because there was already a residential street in the area (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/708416478) only accessed via the previous track road. Finally, I retained the source tag because the original attribution (surface, track_type, oneway) was created from the ground survey. I appreciate your contribution to this region, please reach out if you have further questions.
AkuAnakTimur (2020-06-11 06:17:18+00:00): Hello.

I could see your reasoning. Here's my take on this issue as a local mapper:

1) Way 706559601 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/706559601) is very likely paved with asphalt. I didn't really notice any of its properties during the last ground truth surveying.

2) Way 782854562 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/782854562) may be downgraded to merely a track. Local people (and outsiders) on motor vehicles would rather travel on asphalted roads rather than unpaved highways. See point (1).

3) If you have the time, please take some time to read my comments on https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/32#issuecomment-520301612; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/72538245; https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/80124513
AquaticArmadillo (2020-06-12 16:28:40+00:00): Thank you for the information, AkuAnakTimur. The differentiation between paved and unpaved roads in farmland is very helpful. I will be mindful of this in the future.
eggie (2020-06-09 18:34:40+00:00): Dag Paul,

access=no heb ik verwijderd van het westelijke fietspad. Wellicht is het tijdelijk niet toegankelijk geweest?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2020-06-09 18:41:00+00:00): Is het oostelijke fietspad nog niet klaar?
udarnyk (2020-06-09 19:57:27+00:00): Прошу пояснити причини такої масової правки геометрії - ви, в основному, вилучаєте?
sandroz (2020-06-09 20:13:32+00:00): Коректую, розташування точок, місцевості, ландшафтів, а особливо доріг, троп - тому що люблю катати на велосипеді, а STRAVA бере мапу з OSM.
udarnyk (2020-06-09 20:26:01+00:00): Питання не про STRAVA - у вас маса безпідставних вилучень/зпрощень геометрії, що ландшафти так швидко міняються, ліси виростають? Ви так і не пояснили причину своїх вандальних дій! По трекам ви можете лише шляхи відкорегувати.
sandroz (2020-06-09 20:31:31+00:00): Не зрозумів, якщо ліс вирубали а потім знов засадили це також ліс, а не поле чи пасовище. І якщо я там був місяць назад і бачив там ліс, то він там був, а може і зараз ще є. Покажіть де я не правий.
udarnyk (2020-06-09 20:57:09+00:00): Корекція, це не видалення. Ви видаляєте. В OSM не прийнято видаляти. Ви дуже багато повидаляли. Ви не пояснюєте характер своїх змін для інших учасників проекту.
udarnyk (2020-06-09 20:58:28+00:00): Це стосується усіх ваших чейджсетів
sandroz (2020-06-10 09:01:18+00:00): Ну я тут з Вами не згідний, видалення це тоже частина корегування та виправлень, там де я цілком впевнений у невірному розміщені  об'єктів (ліси, поля, ріки, села!!!), вважаю що краще виправити ніж допускати невірну інформацію на мапі. Але згідний з Вами, що роблю масові правки без пояснень. Буду більш конкретно пояснювати зміни, правки, добавлення.
emvee (2026-05-26 04:51:50+00:00): traffic_sign=city_hamlet

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7606520461
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7606520462
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7606520463
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7606520464
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7606532854
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7606532855
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7606532856
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7606532857

Ça te dérange si je le change en rouge traffic_sign=hamlet_limit
emvee (2026-05-28 06:33:03+00:00): Correction:

Ça te dérange si je le change en traffic_sign=hamlet_limit
osm-operon (2026-05-28 06:50:36+00:00): No problem
emvee (2026-05-28 21:56:32+00:00): Merci, c'est fait !

https://osmcha.org/changesets/183325970
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-02-14 13:23:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 99249536 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME mistaggings in Saudia Arabia.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/98266759
Rainero (2020-06-15 21:01:33+00:00): Hallo AndySchulte,
ist östlich der A33 nicht Dissen, PLZ 49201? Ich meine die Adressen in diesem CS.

Grüße,
Rainer
AndySchulte (2020-06-16 08:37:48+00:00): Hallo Rainer, 
Natürlich hast du recht. Habe es korrigiert, danke für den Hinweis.

Gruß Andy
flohoff (2020-11-17 16:58:36+00:00): Ich hab noch ne Frage. Hab gerade Adressen ergänzt.

Der offizielle Name der Stadt ist doch "Dissen am Teutoburger Wald" oder nicht? Warum ist im addr:city da überall nur "Dissen" ?

Flo
AndySchulte (2020-11-17 18:45:42+00:00): Hallo Flo,

da hast du natürlich recht, es muss  "Dissen am Teutoburger Wald" heißen. Habe es korrigiert. Danke für den Hinweis.

Grüße Andy
Mike Raust (2020-07-02 21:24:38+00:00): Hi South Texas Monkey,

may you please state in your changeset comment that you are e.g. "adding churches" because such big a changeset can't be loaded into achavi.

Thank you very much,
Mike
southtexasmonkey33 (2020-07-02 22:53:34+00:00): Yes, I'll remember that for next time. Thanks for the heads up!
grnr (2020-06-09 23:17:26+00:00): Any reasoning for the revert?
Kevin Wallace (2020-06-09 23:29:48+00:00): Seconding that question.  The discussion in <https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86421458> (east precinct abandoned tag) may be relevant here.
Glassman (2020-06-09 23:44:14+00:00): Those changesets added a landuse=military. Not appropriate or accurate. AFAIK, we have no tag to describe the area as it is now. Again, we don't tag temporary features. While this may last days or even a few weeks, it's still just temporary. As a contrast, look at DC where the 16th street was renamed. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/38.90174/-77.03610. Get the city to rename the street. That would make a lasting statement and be perfect for OSM
Kevin Wallace (2020-06-09 23:52:34+00:00): How about removing the inappropriate landuse tag, then, rather than the entire feature?  This is no less temporary than the east precinct being abandoned.
Kevin Wallace (2020-06-09 23:57:00+00:00): Also, re: "we don't tag temporary features" -- can you please cite the wiki on this?  I can't find any guideline to that effect.