piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
MKnight (2021-11-24 09:04:36+00:00): Moin,
wenn man von Troistedt herkommt ist 40. Ich habe das mal korrigiert.
RSF10 (2021-11-24 17:09:22+00:00): Das ist richtig das einzige 40er Schild was übrig ist lässt sich nicht Richtunsweise ändern denn Richtung Troistedt seht gar nichts und die 100 Richtung Kreisverkehr von Troistedt kommend gen in 60 über ohne 80 , von Gutendorf steht nur 60 und die 40 gehen aber bis zum 70er Schild Richtung Forsthaus
Also dort ist alles Durcheinander.
MKnight (2021-11-24 18:20:36+00:00): Ja, ist real eher mässig beschildert da, aber ich denke, dass die hier vergebenen maxspeed annähernd dem entsprechen sollten, was "gemeint" ist.

Ich habe gesehen, dass Du gerade nochmal maxspeed an den troistedter Zweig eingetragen hast, obwohl dort maxspeed:forward und maxspeed:backward vergeben ist.
Das ist nicht ganz sinnig.
rthik007 (2021-11-25 06:41:00+00:00): "Hi Mingsen,
I have changed classification of road from secondary to residential .
Previous data is fine.
WAY: 559082610
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114207461.
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114165017
Abdullah Abdulrhman (2021-11-29 16:52:47+00:00): Smaller changeset areas, please: http://wiki.osm.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets
amadvance (2021-11-24 19:43:15+00:00): Ciao Luca,

Ho visto che stai aggiungendo la source=survey:CAI ad alcuni sentieri CAI.

Che io sappia tale tag dovrebbe essere messo solo dal CAI dopo una survey secondo i loro standard. 

E' questo il caso? Se no, credo sia meglio non metterlo.

Tieni presente i la maggior parte delle relazioni CAI della bergamasca le ho create io e non ho messo questo tag proprio perché non sono del CAI e non ho fatto il sopralluogo.

Fammi sapere.

Ciao,
Andrea
lucadelu (2021-11-25 07:51:31+00:00): Ciao Andrea,

mi è stato chiesto dalla SOSEC di aggiungere quel tag ai sentieri che mi sembrano essere mantenuti e perciò presenti sul territorio.
Infatti non l'ho aggiunto su tutti i sentieri, se ci sono sentieri che non sembrano completi o che hanno pochi tag inseriti non l'ho inserito.

Posso chiederti che dati hai usato per creare le relazioni?
amadvance (2021-11-25 17:25:29+00:00): OK. Io non lo mettevo per evitare d'interferire. Ma se lo hanno chiesto loro, va sicuramente bene.

Per creare le relazioni ho usato lo shapefile che il CAI di Bergamo mi ha fornito espressamente per questo scopo. Però non l'ho usato per le way essendo abbastanza approssimativo... Per quelle ho usato le StravaHeatmap e rilievi in loco.

Qua trovi più informazioni sul lavoro svolto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lombardia/Sentieri

Ciao,
Andrea
lucadelu (2021-11-26 10:39:53+00:00): beh ma se ti ha dato lo shapefile il CAI Bergamo mettilo pure, sono dati "ufficiali", il tag source=survey:CAI vuole dire che i dati sono rilevati dai soci CAI ma possono arrivare anche da altri rilievi (tipo Piemonte e Emilia per cui si usano i dati forniti dalla regione, anche la Lombardia ha qualcosa di simile) e poi "validati" dal CAI. Perciò se vuoi modificare tutti i sentieri da te creati con questi dati fallo pure, anzi in fai una cosa utile al sistema che sta per utilizzare il CAI per validare ulteriormente questi dati
amadvance (2021-11-27 18:59:22+00:00): Magari lo faro per quelli che ho verificato personalmente.
Ma per gli altri preferisco lasciarlo vuoto. Quello shapefile contiene anche dati vecchi ed un tag del genere darebbe l'ufficialità (di una survey) che in realtà non c'è stata.
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-11-24 09:25:36+00:00): Hello! Note that it is not needed to put "Playground" as name of playground, "Tree" as name of tree, put "House" on every house and so on
user_5359 (2021-11-30 13:36:38+00:00): Hello Netzwolf? Please have a look on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286800138 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/286800139. Did you really mean array=yes (instead area=yes)?
Netzwolf (2021-11-30 13:57:49+00:00): [×] repaired
Allison P (2022-02-25 05:13:05+00:00): This is not an emergency access road, it's a part of the residential road that has been blocked to through traffic. As such, these turn restrictions are useless and the tagging is incorrect. The turn restrictions are unhelpful even if this were an emergency access road, because a lack of access is already implied. I am reverting this changeset.
mubbasa (2022-02-25 12:18:51+00:00): Hi,
Thank you for reviewing my changeset and highlighting the issue.
Apologies, for tagging the road as emergency access road and adding the incorrect turn restrictions.
I really appreciate the information provided, and i will keep the learning and ensure to not repeat such errors going ahead.
Thank you once again, I'm looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
mubbasa
wielandb (2021-11-25 21:16:49+00:00): Bitte leerstehende Läden nicht löschen, sondern auf disused:*=* setzen, um die Chronik zu erhalten. [2] 

Von der Wiki-Seite [1]: "Mit dem Präfix "disused:" werden Objekte bezeichnet, die geschlossen, nicht mehr in Betrieb oder nicht in Benutzung sind. [...] Beispiele sind u.a. leerstehende Geschäfte, geschlossene Parkplätze oder stillgelegte Bahnlinien."

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:disused:
[2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice#Erhalte_die_Chronik
habi (2021-11-25 15:11:58+00:00): Hallo und willkommen bei OpenStreetMap!

Ich habei die Webseite von euch und die Telefonnnummer unter dem `contact`-Tag vereinheitlicht und "richtig" eingetragen, so dass Datenkonsumenten diese auch anzeigen können (siehe z.B. [1])
Den 'healthcare`-Tag habe ich auf Englisch übersetzt, auch wenn der eigentlich 'nur' für Ärzte und Ärtzinnen sinnvoll ist.

E liebe Gruess usem Liebifäud,
habi

[1]: https://www.qwant.com/maps/place/osm:node:9279727239@Oreia_H%C3%B6rberatung#map=20.00/46.9441921/7.4323479
4004 (2021-11-28 01:28:47+00:00): здравствуйте, 
пожалуйста, напишите описание ваших правок
d1sr4n (2022-02-01 09:05:12+00:00): Зачем вы дворовые проезды и подъезды к торговым центрам (124436219, 982814448 ; 982814447; 982814449, так далее) ?
d1sr4n (2022-02-01 09:05:50+00:00): * зачем вы удалили дворовые проезды и подъезды к торговым центрам (124436219, 982814448 ; 982814447; 982814449, так далее) ?
fortkomi (2022-02-01 09:25:53+00:00): По неграмотности и неопытности пользования данным сервисом. В данном случае полностью с Вами согласен - эти корректировки только в откат.
RicoElectrico (2021-11-26 22:58:47+00:00): Cześć, obrys tego budynku nie zgadza się ze zdjęciami lotniczymi. Czy było w ogóle je widać w czasie edycji? Czasem Geoportal ma problemy techniczne, ale wtedy można wybrać inne zdjęcia z menu warstw.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
pw33 (2021-12-13 08:36:56+00:00): Здравствуйте. А вы проезжали по этой дороге прямо до Пхии? Обратите внимание, что у дороги остались куски construction и связноть все равно нарушена.

И еще один вопрос: по какому признаку вы разделили дорогу на service и track?
Ilia  Tsygankov (2021-12-13 13:12:46+00:00): Я пробегал до верха перевала и чутка вниз. Знакомый проезжал до Пхии, на спуске грейдер заканчивается и начинается грунтовка. Куски construction острил сознательно, так как часто мостов были в строительстве и их надо было обходить и маршрут по ней строить некорректно. Но при этом дорога есть и хотелось бы чтобы она на том же maps.me отобразилась. С  service и track  не до конца понимаю разницы, поэтому мог и косякнуть. Хотел подчеркнуть грейдер/грунтовка.
pw33 (2021-12-21 16:22:59+00:00): Все, что было отмечено (в версии линии #6) как underconstuction уже было грейдером по состоянию на май этого года. 
Также первый мост от Архыза вполне себе реальный. Остальные корректно нарисованы, да. Но я в виду небольшой кусок в точке N 43.57412° E 41.09680°
Но, мне кажется, некорректно рисовать sevice прямо до track. На переднем крае строительных работ дороги нет. Там с трудом можно проехать только на внедорожнике или тракторе. Думаю, стоит отделить service от track небольшим участком under construction, чтобы навигатор не вел по непроезжаемой дороге.

В подтверждение своих слов могу в лс скинуть фото от мая этого года.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:58:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
habi (2021-11-25 15:17:27+00:00): Hier ist dir wohl ein Fehler unterlaufen.
Mit einer Höhe von fast 800000 km (height=796774518) wäre der Kommunikations-Masten fast doppelt so weit von der Erde weg wie der Mond :)

Ich habe deine Änderung mit Changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114227098 rückgängig gemacht.
Gyrwa (2021-11-26 00:31:28+00:00): Please have a read of UK road tagging guidelines https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom. highway=trunk is for primary roads (green signs), which the A420 is.
Could you revert these changes.
IknowJoseph (2021-11-26 10:01:12+00:00): I agree with Gyrwa on this one.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
Tomas Straupis (2021-11-24 12:48:50+00:00): Atšaukiau neteisingus landuse pakeitimus.
gendy54 (2022-01-14 23:10:51+00:00): Bonjour,
Il n'a pas de litige sur le name à mettre sur les gendarmeries. Tout est consigné sur https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/France/Gendarmerie_nationale#Les_brigades

Donat
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:12+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
skyper (2023-01-01 14:23:27+00:00): Hallo Sonnenmilch,
sorry, dass ich jetzt erst dazu kam, diesen Änderungssatz zu überprüfen. Zwei Dinge sind mir aufgefallen:
1. Bitte lade keine CS über Halb Deutschland hoch, sondern verwende in so einem Fall mehrere.
2. Öffnungszeiten werden mit englischen Abkürzungen der Tage angegeben. JOSM warnt mich entsprechen und schlägt mir vor "Di" in "Tu" zu ändern. Das iD das nicht macht ist eher traurig.

Viele Grüße,
skyper
laurent-38 (2021-11-26 08:23:21+00:00): Bonjour Pravaz 2GT3,

Les passages piétons sont habituellement modélisés par un simple point sur la route, avec les attributs highway=crossing.

Il est rare en France de modéliser les passages piéton par un chemin. Cela a du sens lorsque le passage piéton est en prolongation d'un autre chemin piéton qui vient couper la route. Dans ce cas, il faut créer un point à l'intersection du passage piéton et de la route. Il faut toujours créer un point à l'intersection de 2 chemins/routes, sauf dans le cas des ponts et des tunnels.

Cordialement
~~
laurent-38
laurent-38 (2022-07-21 08:00:31+00:00): En l'absence de réponse, passage piéton supprimé  : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123880250
351293 (2021-11-25 19:05:57+00:00): Vielleicht magst Du Dich mal mit den hier offenen Notes und den darin enthaltenen Diskussionen beschäftigen....
LG
351293 (2021-11-25 19:09:17+00:00): bei Deinem Changeset kam jetzt durchaus auch etwas "Unsinn" herbei....
kreuzschnabel (2021-11-25 20:05:53+00:00): Ich hab euch noch ein bisschen Spielwiese gelassen. Zum Beispiel sind die Sprengschutzwände am Hauptklärwerk schon längst wieder abgebaut. Wenn ihr schon OSM als Newsticker und stundenaktuelle Baufortschrittsdokumentation auffasst, dann bitte konsequent :)
kreuzschnabel (2021-11-25 20:07:25+00:00): Und wenn du mir genauer erklären würdest, was für Unsinn ich eingebaut habe, statt nur vage Anmerkungen zu machen, dann könnte ich etwas dazulernen.
351293 (2021-11-25 20:32:28+00:00): @kreuzschnabel meinst Du gerade mich oder FraukeLeo?
Enock4seth (2021-11-24 20:51:21+00:00): Avoid using BLOCK CAPITAL LETTERS as chageset comment. Please see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
d1sr4n (2022-01-25 20:12:42+00:00): Что это за мусорный спам restriction relations? Для чего вы вносите эту информацию?

Вот эти объекты конкретно не имеют никакого смысла, весь остальной чейнлджсет состоит из такого же шума.

{Relation id=13474836 version=1 VT [way 1005800584, node 6525643329, way 814875201]}	MemberInfo{roles='<different>', positions='1,3,✗'}	
{Relation id=13474837 version=1 VT [way 814875201, node 6525643329, way 1005800583]}	MemberInfo{roles='<different>', positions='1,3,✗'}	
{Relation id=13474839 version=1 VT [way 694837311, node 6525643323, way 1005800584]}	MemberInfo{roles='<different>', positions='1,3,✗'}	
{Relation id=13474842 version=1 VT [way 694838273, node 6525643323, way 694837311]}	MemberInfo{roles='<different>', positions='1,3,✗'}	
{Relation id=13474834 version=1 VT [way 1005800583, node 6525643329, way 1005800583]}	MemberInfo{roles='<different>', positions='1,3,✗'}	
{Relation id=13474835 version=1 VT [way 1005800584, node 6525643329, way 1005800584]}	MemberInfo{roles='<different>', positions='1,3,✗'}	
{Relation id=13474838 version=1 VT [way 1005800584, node 6525643323, way 1005800584]}	MemberInfo{roles='<different>', positions='1,3,✗'}	
{Relation id=13474840 version=1 VT [way 694837311, node 6525643323, way 694837311]}	MemberInfo{roles='<different>', positions='1,3,✗'}	
{Relation id=13474841 version=1 VT [way 694838273, node 6525643323, way 694838273]}	MemberInfo{roles='<different>', positions='1,3,✗'}	

На местности нет никаких сведетельств, ни дорожных знаков, ничего. Да их и быть там не может.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:59:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
rthik007 (2021-11-25 06:20:18+00:00): "Hi Amar Firdaus,
I have modified the geometry based on ground truth,
way 944742775
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114206924.
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114172374
hatul (2021-11-24 22:53:32+00:00): העברת את colour=red ואת היחס של שביל ישראל אבל לא את היחס lwn 17431. אני מניח שגם אותו צריך להעביר.
hatul (2021-11-24 22:54:25+00:00): שביל ישראל חזר מערבה? לפני שנתיים הוא הוסט מזרחה.
zstadler (2022-02-22 12:44:53+00:00): העברתי את היחס של השביל האדום כך שיתאים לתגית ה 
colour
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 01:03:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:49:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
rthik007 (2021-11-25 07:07:04+00:00): "Hi Amar Firdaus,
I have changed the classification of roads from unclassified to residential  as these are leading to single entities.
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114207986
Thank you."
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114172882
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:56:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
rthik007 (2021-11-25 07:06:28+00:00): "Hi Amar Firdaus,
I have changed the classification of roads from unclassified to residential  as these are leading to single entities.
Kindly check with,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/114208039.
and also check with below changesets
114173232
114173200
114172925
Thank you.
"
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114173251
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-01-10 00:51:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 115957299, 115961929 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, removing some allegedly unsourced maxheight changes.  Several attempts to contact the mapper failed - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5581 and previous.
火箭苦力怕i (2021-11-28 20:14:52+00:00): 您就这么喜欢用地加building=yes🐴
literan (2021-11-24 18:39:55+00:00): да
Tomas Straupis (2021-11-24 12:52:05+00:00): Niekada nereikia klausyti nesąmoningų kreivo iD siūlymų „taisyti žymas“. Pakeitimas atšauktas.
ivanbranco (2022-03-21 11:27:26+00:00): Hi kerivo,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/202283937/history

the housenumber here is 3 or 7?
archpdx (2021-11-25 01:50:54+00:00): Hi,
I notice many of these slip lanes you added in this changeset are disconnected from the roadways they're supposed to connect: for example https://www.osm.org/way/1005816016 is only connected to La Palma and not White Star. This slip lane should probably be a primary link instead of a service road as it's linking to La Palma and should be one way. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_link

I also recommend using iD (https://osm.org/edit?editor=id) to start off with as it connects features by default and has a bunch of presets and fields you can use instead of having to remember what tags to use.

If you have any questions feel free to respond to my comment

-archpdx
benoitdd (2021-11-24 18:36:20+00:00): attention, tu as remplacé le tag higway=unclassified par barrier=gate sur la route w813243176. est-ce vraiment ce que tu voulais faire?
ftcat (2021-11-24 15:01:54+00:00): Please don't delete water reservoirs. If you are unsure of a major feature leave it.
AwezGeo (2021-11-24 17:48:00+00:00): Hi ftcat, 
I hope you are well.
Thank you so much for drawing my attention to this.

I don't remember if I've reached out to you via the comment session on tasking manager or not but I've been having challenges with most of the stuff you map (roads, waterways) that per the OSM guidelines and project description were not supposed to be mapped.

When I was validating this tile, those 2 particular reservoirs were giving me a lot of errors, checked on the wiki and couldn't find ways to modify it without distortion.

However, I  render my sincere apologies for any inconvenience caused, it is a great chance to learn more on reservoir mappings.
Happy mapping.
ftcat (2021-11-25 09:32:17+00:00): Hi AwezGeo,

I map independently to HOT, don't assume all mapping is done through the HOT tasking manager. I know Zambia very well as I live there so I find myself making many corrections to the mapping done by HOT mappers,  including the validators.

Highway classification in Zambia is particularly difficult as many of what appear to be large roads are in reality very wide tracks and not actual gazetted roads. You will find they vary quite substantially season to season. Many areas  covered by the HOT projects are rural areas made up of small family farms that are less formally organised, then there are larger commercial farming areas that have the reservoirs and a more structured layout with large centre pivot irrigation schemes.
AwezGeo (2021-11-25 11:09:07+00:00): Hi ftcat,
I might not have lived there but I am dealing with the resources available to me and the insight given during some of our sessions with the Zambia team leading this project I happen to be partaking in.

And I am not assuming everything is done through the tasking manager as I understand there are diversified ways of contributing to OSM project. I have come across a couple of stuff with history as you being the sole contributor which I share on the moderators of this project's page for guidance which sometimes gives the option of deletion.

For this particular one, I did not consult, I only used the wiki forums for which I am expressing my remorse for any inconvenience caused.

We are all learners regardless of our level of experience, I have erred and I take full responsibility for my action.

I am only drawing your attention to watch out or possibly  learn more on the things you map and how you map them. Coming from or staying in the community is not enough to understand the guidelines in mapping for which reason there are documentations on how to map generally in OSM.

I do not gain anything from deleting another person's contribution. The ultimate goal is to have readily available and accessible data of quality that can be used by all for decision making purposes.

Once again, I am sorry.
Happy Mapping ftcat!
julcnx (2026-06-16 04:00:40+00:00): Hi, some of the ways tagged `surface=clay` in this changeset appear to be laterite roads. `surface=laterite` was approved on 2026-06-15 and describes this surface more precisely. Would you be comfortable retagging? Happy to do it if you prefer. More info: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:surface=laterite
eggie (2021-11-24 12:39:59+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
Frans S (2021-11-24 16:06:58+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114176388
Frans S (2021-11-24 16:05:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
Your mappings are not allways in according to the HOT quality standards.
Please pay attention on these points:

D: Connected nodes of different buildings of objects.
E: Buildings not squared.

Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
More help information:
View this video's about common New mappers Mistakes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
More info can be found on https://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114176692
marczoutendijk (2021-11-24 12:38:49+00:00): Hello caxton,
What is the meaning of the quality=medium tag?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group