piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
jaap de vries (2017-06-01 07:56:43+00:00): Ik heb alles aan moeten passen wat jij toevoegt met maps.me in Wijk en Aalburg. 
Maps.me graag niet gebruiken zie ook mijn pb aan jou.
Je kan hierdoor een tijdelijke blok krijgen mocht je door gaan op deze manier.
Supaplex (2017-07-09 16:30:25+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
ma-rt-in (2017-06-01 20:53:32+00:00): Bist du dir da wirklich sicher, das hier die THW Unterkunft ist?
ma-rt-in (2017-06-01 20:54:35+00:00): sry hat sich erledigt
Jungo2005 (2017-06-02 10:17:03+00:00): Es gibt leider immer wieder Ortsverbände die an mehreren Standorten verteilt sind. Der OV Trier gehört dazu: https://ov-trier.thw.de/unser-thw-ortsverband/unterkunft/

Daher habe ich hierfür extra ein fixme angelegt mit der Information. Wenn du eine bessere Idee oder Formulierung hast würde ich mich freuen.
ma-rt-in (2017-06-02 10:25:32+00:00): Ne das ist so schon richtig, da ja die Post an die adresse geht. lassen wir das so :)
PT-53 (2017-05-31 16:31:31+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
Du hast an diesem Weg (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/254860744#map=19/48.07369/9.65466) mofe=yes ergänzt.
Bei meiner letzten Besichtigung mit Fotodokumentation am 31.05.2016 konnte ich kein entspr. Verkehrsschild sehen. 
Ist das neu ?
Grüße
Ist das neu =
rainerU (2017-06-01 07:23:23+00:00): Hallo PT-53,

am westlichen Ende des Wegs an der Ortsausfahrt von Oggelshausen ist das Zusatzschild "Mofa frei" angebracht. In der Gegenrichtung am östlichen Ende des Wegs fehlt dieses Zusatzschild. Solche Inkonsistenzen findet man immer wieder mal. Ich gehe davon aus, dass in so einem Fall Mofas erlaubt sein sollen und man nur das Zusatzschild an einem Ende vergessen hat.

Ich habe die Fotos mit den beiden Schildern auf Mapillary hochgeladen:

https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/9bYmZhRYgjS7skvFerbjcA
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/LP6P9c81Ht695EjoVprVqg

Grüße
Rainer
PT-53 (2017-06-01 18:50:43+00:00): Hallo Rainer,
vielleicht ist diese Art der Ausschilderung ja Absicht. Mofas dürfen auf Radwegen außerorts ja "Kraft Gesetz" fahren.
Grüße
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-06-01 21:18:48+00:00): I think you should have modified but not deleted the pedestrian path that separates the main road on 'Ilha de Luanda' in it's entirety, the area that I had added to the map is a representation of what will be found at that location

https://i.imgur.com/wxvzVgI.png
stevenLAD (2017-06-05 08:19:55+00:00): Sorry about this - I deleted to facilitate modification but forgot to reinstate and I agree that there is a separation along the length of the road. I have now added it back in. I do not agree however that this is a pedestrian path, and have added it as a traffic island area. Some realignment still needs to be done.
corfede (2017-06-05 21:13:26+00:00): Carlo V Castle tags were on the original relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3986153/history;
now I deleted that relation and moved the remaining tags to the building relation.
Commodoortje (2017-06-01 11:18:03+00:00): Is de mast op het dak niet meer aanwezig?
ftrebien (2017-06-01 16:29:52+00:00): "Retorno" não é o nome da via e portanto não deve ir na etiqueta name=*. Deve ser colocado na etiqueta destination=* como estava antes. Vou desfazer essa alteração já que tinha acabado de mapear isso corretamente.
Alexandre de Menezes (2017-06-01 17:27:47+00:00): Pois é, meu entendimento é que o destination o final do link, ou seja é a Rua Dom Pedro II no sentido oposto.  Essa via é o retorno.
Em todo caso, teria sido mais educado mudar apenas a edição que tu não concordou (o nome do tag) e não desfazer todo o meu conjunto, que tinha também a correção do local do retorno e várias faixas de pedestre no entorno.
Alexandre de Menezes (2017-06-01 17:37:37+00:00): Olha o que eu achei no help:
"First of all, you should generally not undo someone else's changeset without talking to them first, and giving them a chance to repair any damage they might have done themselves, or explain why what they did is actually correct. In most cases, a response is not urgent - you can afford to give the person some time to react. (Of course there are cases of obvious vandalism where this does not hold - but often what looks like vandalism can be a newbie having misunderstood something!)"
ftrebien (2017-06-01 18:58:03+00:00): Eu não desfiz todo o seu changeset, apenas mudei as etiquetas name e destination do retorno. ;-)
ftrebien (2017-06-01 18:58:52+00:00): E você pode confirmar isso aqui: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/49170171
ftrebien (2017-06-01 19:09:39+00:00): Quanto a desfazer o seu trabalho antes da sua resposta:
- você continuou trabalhando sem responder ao meu questionamento anterior sobre a adição de highway=junction nos entroncamentos (http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46559787)
- sem resposta, não pretendo deixar que erros se acumulem no mapa, especialmente quando acabaram de ser corrigidos
- creio que você entende o propósito da etiqueta destination=* porque vi você usando ela corretamente algumas vezes, supus que esta vez foi uma gafe e que só precisava ser comunicada
- you're not a newbie
Alexandre de Menezes (2017-06-01 19:10:28+00:00): OK, é que o mapa está renderizado antes das minhas alterações, por isso achei que tinham sido revertidas.  :)
Alexandre de Menezes (2017-06-01 19:13:02+00:00): Mas ainda acho que destination=Retorno não está correto.  Pra mim seria o mesmo que colocar um destination=Acesso, por exemplo.
Alexandre de Menezes (2017-06-01 19:15:54+00:00): "sem resposta, não pretendo deixar que erros se acumulem no mapa, especialmente quando acabaram de ser corrigidos"
Nesse caso acho que "erro" é uma opinião pessoal e eu poderia dizer exatamente a mesma coisa. :D
ftrebien (2017-06-01 19:32:14+00:00): destination=Acesso está correto se for o que constar nas placas de orientação de destino no local. O objetivo desta etiqueta é permitir que a aplicação diga para o motorista algo como "Siga as placas para 'Acesso'", e o motorista verá a placa com esse nome e saberá o que fazer. Há uma placa de orientação (azul, com seta, conforme a especificação do DNIT) bem na entrada do retorno com o texto "Retorno" então está correto.
ftrebien (2017-06-01 19:40:34+00:00): Quanto a ser uma opinião pessoal:
"The key destination=* describes the content of signposts or ground writing indicating the names of the locations that the tagged way is heading to. Thus navigation systems can refer to road signs that the driver actually sees."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination
"If something really doesn't have a name, don't add a name to OpenStreetMap."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names
E também: https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-br@openstreetmap.org/msg11033.html
Agora, dá muito trabalho catar toda essa informação pra demonstrar que estou certo, tire dúvidas antes e mantenha-se informado. Imagina se você começar a mapear com base em opiniões pessoais e eu também?
"If you find elements with tags that you think are wrong then do correct them. It's a wiki, your corrections can always be reverted, so be bold."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
"We have highway tags which call upon the mapper to make a classification. The difference between a highway=trunk and highway=primary may be unclear to some mappers, but has been made much more verifiable by documenting in the wiki, even to the extent of explaining how mappers in different countries might apply the tags based on local road signage. The same has been attempted for distinguishing highway=unclassified and highway=residential (and other such low level highways) but, in fact, mappers often struggle to make the distinction. Despite concerted efforts to document the application of these tags and provide examples, these tags (or the distinction between them) is actually fairly unverifiable."
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability
Alexandre de Menezes (2017-06-02 02:28:08+00:00): Realmente tem uma placa lá dizendo "retorno", assim como uma de "Max 3,5m" e de proibido estacionar (ainda não mapeadas.  Mas não concordo que isso implique em colocar o texto literal no destination.
Eu procurei a informação antes de responder, e acredito que seja novamente uma questão de interpretação.  Eu já tinha visto a página do wiki, e todas as instruções e exemplos são para saídas/acessos.  Meu argumento é justamente que o retorno é uma situação diferente, que não está prevista lá, e que não faz sentido tratar do mesmo jeito: o acesso é uma ligação entre duas vias, e retorno é a ligação ao outro sentido da mesma via.  Assim como não faria sentido colocar essa tag em um link de rotatória.
ftrebien (2017-06-02 04:26:17+00:00): É fato consolidado, muito discutido já na comunidade, que concorda há muitos anos, que os textos "Retorno", "Acesso" e similares NÃO devem ir, em hipótese alguma, na etiqueta name=*, que foi como você fez. Não tão consolidado mas com um grande consenso é que o que consta nas placas de orientação de destino deve ir em destination=* para ser então mostrados ao usuário pela aplicação (sei que pelo menos o OsmAnd e o roteador da MapQuest fazem isso). Se você acha que não deve ir em destination=*, então só sobra description=*, que é uma anotação que nenhuma grande aplicação consome (só algumas tentativas obscuras de obter mais informações ao clicar em elementos do mapa atualmente mostram esse texto).
ftrebien (2017-06-02 04:27:07+00:00): Pelas definições, você pode quebrar a rotatória em partes (ela não precisa ser um círculo inteiro, pode ser um círculo quebrado em pedaços) e adicionar destination=* a cada pedaço conforme as placas de orientação em cada saída.
ftrebien (2017-06-02 04:35:01+00:00): Apesar disso, como no link que lhe passei anteriormente, a comunidade concorda que "Retorno" deve ir em destination=*. A anterior era do Gerald Weber, esta é do Aun, ambos são colaboradores mais antigos no OSM do que eu. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-br/2015-February/009561.html
reneman (2017-05-31 17:25:02+00:00): merge_to_right ?? re/li verwechselt?
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-31 17:27:13+00:00): Ich meinte _mein_ rechts … *rausred* Danke.
calfarome (2017-06-01 19:38:11+00:00): Hola Mauvb19,
Bienvenido a OpenStreetMap y  realmente  se aprecia sus ediciones de map.
Veo que ud. agrego un  leisure park en un nodo, lo cual no es correcto, además el parque ya esta trazada como un polígono y  lleva un  nombre diferente a lo que  ud. agregó.  ¿Estas seguro que el parque se  llama ' MoraGua' ?. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4887963533/history#map=19/9.95816/-84.04185.
emergency99 (2017-05-31 18:00:25+00:00): Langsam reicht es dann aber auch! Das Gebäude ist höchstens ein Schupfen, es heisst aber nicht so!
habi (2023-01-23 08:29:24+00:00): Ciao Hoschi118

Ich bin auf der schweizweiten Suche nach Dingen, die nur mit 'Haus' benannt sind auf https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4887983426/ gestossen.
Auf den Luftbildern sieht es hier nirgends nach einem Garten aus, ich habe diesen Punkt einfach gelöscht.

Gruss aus Bern,
habi
mueschel (2021-06-06 09:10:33+00:00): Hi,
this node got a "archeologic=yes" tag which seems strange - could you check that?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4888043014
topolusitania (2021-06-14 10:26:20+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Windpump.jpg
Tags changed to man_made=windpump
5m4u9 (2017-05-31 17:55:12+00:00): no es de interes mundial la casa de todas las personas, vamos a borrar esta info porque expone tu privacidad.
neuhausr (2017-06-02 13:56:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thanks for adding detail to the map! A couple tips: 1) in the iD editor, you can right click on a shape to get a context menu. One of these is "square" which is really useful for buildings. 2) you've added some park features where it seems like wood or forest tag would be better. 3) you've added water features in some places that seem odd. Some of the water is swimming pools which also have their own tag, but other things you added seem to be in the middle of driveways, lawns, etc? Let me know if you have questions. Thanks again for contributing!
karitotp (2017-06-01 19:17:44+00:00): Hi, welcome to Openstreetmap and thank you for contributing. You added buildings that has incorrectly shape according the imagery, could you please take a look again and fixing them. Also confirm if the water canal exists there. Thanks
Regards
wambacher (2017-06-01 09:32:43+00:00): Never ever remove tags from objects, which you don't know. you deleted one important admin boundary in this country. :(
scai (2017-05-31 16:33:16+00:00): Hallo NxpTonZ,

bezüglich name=Parkhaus: Bitte keine beschreibenden Namen verwenden. Als Name sollte der offizielle Name verwendet werden, oder keiner falls es soetwas nicht gibt. Dass es sich um ein Parkhaus handelt ist bereits durch die restlichen Attribute ausreichend beschrieben. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name
emergency99 (2017-05-31 18:36:06+00:00): Das hab ich ihm schon 5 mal per Changesetkommentar gesagt. Hab im nun auch eine Mail geschrieben. Mal schauen wann er aufhört diesen typisxhen iD-Beginner-Fehler zu machen.
naoliv (2017-05-31 17:16:17+00:00): Anderson, não sei exatamente o que você está utilizando do Waze para as edições, mas é preciso tomar cuidado, já que não possuímos autorização para uso dos dados dele (assim como do Google).
andersoal (2017-05-31 22:26:53+00:00): Utilizei como um ponto de verificação na layer do IBGE aqui do OSM, mas nada fora disso. Mas tem total razão quanto ao direito de uso que é imposto. Obrigado. Por conta do Editor manter o último comentário utilizado, muitas edições que fiz foi com esse comentário, sem nem mesmo utilizar a fonte do Waze, já que pela camada do IBGE foi suficiente confirmar o nome das vias. Mas vou respeitar a regulamentação deles quanto ao uso a partir de agora (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#Why_don.27t_you_just_use_Google_Maps.2Fwhoever_for_your_data.3F)
iandees (2017-05-31 16:36:06+00:00): I've reverted your change because these are clearly not parks. Please add only real places to OpenStreetMap. Thanks!
maraf24 (2017-06-02 20:48:42+00:00): Wycofane./Reverted.
Polarbear (2017-06-13 07:44:24+00:00): Bitte keine Werbetexte in OSM. Ich habe das mal auf eine sachliche Aufzählung reduziert. 

Danke.
dcapillae_old (2017-05-31 17:31:52+00:00): ¡Hola, Largeroliker! Gracias por mapear en Málaga. Si te interesa mejorar el mapa de la ciudad o su municipio, puedes consultar la página del wiki dedicada a Málaga: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:M%C3%A1laga
¡Gracias de nuevo!
Supaplex (2017-07-09 16:31:27+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Commodoortje (2017-06-01 10:46:50+00:00): Welkomst PB verzonden.
Commodoortje (2017-06-01 10:48:04+00:00): Ik heb inmiddels dit stukje ook naar Biltlaan omgezet.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/215314359
chnav (2017-06-01 06:03:55+00:00): Судя по майским снимкам там что-то строится типа ж/д вокзала ?
dansit (2017-06-01 06:14:48+00:00): Вокзал уже построили. сегодня на него должен первый поезд приди. Там вообще весь район нужно стереть и заново нарисовать
Diógenes de Sinope (2017-07-23 23:35:15+00:00): I do not know whether you have noticed this yet but it would appear that someone has made a reversion, roads in this area are superimposed on top of others
DaxServer (2017-05-31 17:29:35+00:00): Please read the changeset of "Bank of Baroda" and not "ICICI Bank". Sorry about this!
DaxServer (2017-05-31 18:00:54+00:00): Way 469351193 is stripped off of amenity tags as there is a Node tagged with the same inside this Way (Area).
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:36:56+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
Commodoortje (2017-06-01 11:13:04+00:00): Deze changeset wordt het niet.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49141983

Ik heb een poging gedaan om het juist in beeld te krijgen. Zou je deze situatie willen controleren op juistheid?
https://www.dropbox.com/s/9hz87mzzkc61xc8/2017-06-01_13-10-36.png?raw=1
De wijzigingen die ik heb doorgevoerd zijn hier te zien.
http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=49161749
Commodoortje (2017-06-01 11:14:29+00:00): Het wordt je zeker niet kwalijk genomen. OpenStreetMap heeft een leercurve en het is een samenwerkingsproject. We moeten samenwerken om de beste kaart te maken.
highflyer74 (2017-06-01 07:29:06+00:00): Hallo nochmal! Bezugnehmend auf Deinen CS-Kommentar: sei Dir immer bewusst, dass viele Dinge auf der "Standardkarte" nicht angezeigt werden. Diese Karte ist nur eine Beispielanwendung. Was auf einer Karte, die aus OSM Daten generiert wird, angezeigt wird, obliegt dem Macher der Karte. Das ist ja gerade das Tolle bei OSM. Insofern erfasse Dinge immer so, wie sie in Wirklichkeit auch sind, ohne dabei an eine bestimmte Karte zu denken. Die Daten können genutzt werden, auch wenn sie nicht sichtbar sind. Siehe auch https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice bzw. für die ganz krassen Fälle https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Taggen_f%C3%BCr_den_Renderer
dgitto (2017-06-03 05:33:47+00:00): benvenuta in OSM, Non credo ci sia davvero una ciminiera in mezzo a Viale Africa
mueschel (2017-06-06 11:15:27+00:00): Hi,
is "Koma-koma" the name of this river?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/331458995

Cheers, Jan
Lineo (2017-09-03 08:29:20+00:00): Hi Jan,

Yes Koma-koma is the name of the river
mueschel (2017-09-03 09:28:21+00:00): Thank you for correcting the tags!
Commodoortje (2017-06-01 10:22:23+00:00): Welkom op OSM.
.
MAPS.ME is helaas niet de optimale editor voor OpenStreetMap. Waardoor vervuiling kan ontstaan.
Het is eigenlijk noodzakelijk dat u de edit controleert middels JOSM, Potlatch of ID om deze vervuiling tegen te gaan.
U bent namelijk middels uw toevoeging "verantwoordelijk" voor wat u in OSM brengt.
Wij danken u voor uw begrip en we hopen dat u goede aanvullingen verricht op OSM.
.
Lees hier hoe je OSM het beste kunt gebruiken en hoe je kunt bijdragen aan een betere kaart: 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NL:Map_Features
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=12 

Mocht je vragen hebben, kun je altijd contact met me opnemen, ik (en medemappers zijn/) ben bereid om je te helpen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/message/new/Commodoortje

Klik op de link "meld u aan om mee te praten" om een reactie te geven in deze changeset.
Commodoortje (2017-06-01 10:32:16+00:00): Drukkerij Schreurs was al aanwezig binnen OSM. Ik heb jouw node samengevoegd met de bestaande. 
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2872982813
Je had zelf getagd als boekhandel, dit lijkt me niet juist. Kwam dit door de beperking die MAPS.ME heeft?
Hjart (2017-05-31 18:21:28+00:00): Please note that "Apotek" means pharmacy and that Matas isn't a pharmacy, but a shop=chemist.
cadsauxk (2017-07-27 21:26:10+00:00): Olá Wanderson, tudo bem? Obrigado pelas suas contribuições! 

Só um comentário, a gente evita repetir o código da rodovia no nome. O nome é apenas reservado para nomes próprios como "Rodovia Fernão Dias", não cabe colocar o código que já tem campo próprio para isto.

abraço!
chnav (2017-06-01 05:57:21+00:00): Вы описание к линии видели ? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306658544/history

там явно написано "не удалять". Чем вам помешала эта линия ? Она не обозначена как трамвай, её не видно на карте. перед удалением чего-либо обязательно связывайтесь с автором - зачем он это рисовал.
74523978 (2017-06-01 00:31:09+00:00): =7 juni
TheDutchMan13 (2017-06-10 21:36:54+00:00): Removed tiger zip data (left & right)
RicoElectrico (2017-10-27 19:08:52+00:00): Cześć. Parę strzępków ulicy ominąłeś. Poprawiam to.

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/165503605/history
Marych_ (2017-06-01 19:02:53+00:00): А что под Соколом знаете?
Та еще 1-2 зоны отдыха
chnav (2017-06-01 05:51:24+00:00): Привет, у нас не принято просто так удалять объекты, особенно если на них есть полезные данные. В данном случае надо было изменить building=yes на was:building=yes, в этом случае сохранятся адресные теги и новички не будут рисовать здания заново т.к. они видны на бинге. Второй вариант - изменить теги building и повесить теги landuse=brownfield (место под застройку).

Удаление полигонов с адресной информацией это самый последний шаг, когда остальное совсем неприемлемо (например там точно ничего не будут строить и уже разбили парк, дорогу и т.д.)
Commodoortje (2017-06-01 10:19:02+00:00): Welkomst PB verzonden.
Commodoortje (2017-06-01 10:21:19+00:00): Goed bezig, zelf ben ik vorige week nog in Kampen geweest, en zag dat d Olde Vismark aan de IJsselkade een nieuwe naam had gekregen (zelfde eigenaar nieuwe formule) Deze heb ik nu ook aangepast.
wasdroger (2017-06-01 16:04:19+00:00): Klopt! Deze had ik zelf ook al aangepast op Google Maps, maar was hem hier vergeten (:
alphensebezorger (2017-06-01 20:19:23+00:00): Dit adres is zeker per ongeluk verplaatst: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2732469793? (Is adrespunt van Oudestraat 120.) Zal ik hem voor je terugleggen op de oude positie? Of zoek je zelf een geschikt plaatsje?
alphensebezorger (2017-07-16 13:01:51+00:00): Ik heb het adrespunt weer teruggelegd op de originale positie (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/50325551). Geen antwoord op bovenstaande opmerking gekregen.
ferrocarta (2017-10-24 13:56:05+00:00): Hi,
I am not sure this line should have been tagged "railway=narrow_gauge". Sure the gauge is narrower than standard, but 1067 is the standard gauge in all of Queensland. Either the whole state should be in narrow gauge, or since this is the common gauge it should remain "railway=rail", but the current situation is inconsistent.
mavl (2017-06-01 16:32:07+00:00): Здравствуйте. Вы недавно использовали редактор программы maps.me для внесения изменений на карту. Ваши изменения были добавлены на карту OpenStreetMap [http://www.openstreetmap.org].  
  
Пожалуйста, не добавляйте на общую карту свои персональные заметки, а также объекты, которые не существуют в действительности. Изменения, сделанные вами в этом пакете пакете правок, отменены.
SafwatHalaby (2017-06-10 08:22:18+00:00): Hello, are your edits real guest_houses or personal bookmarks? A guesthouse is a place where tourists come and stay, kind of similar to a hotel but on a smaller scale.

If these are your personal favorites, please only save them locally and do not upload to OSM.
karitotp (2017-05-31 20:36:56+00:00): Correct changeset comment : Mapping turn-restriction in NYC
Correct source : Bing/Mapbox, Street level imagery
5m4u9 (2017-06-01 20:18:00+00:00): creo que el nombre akualand esta mal, debe ser Aqualand... por el parque temático próximo.
francoclaros (2017-06-01 20:30:57+00:00): En realidad debería ser Aqualand,
Sin embargo la urbanización la denominaron con K, en el proyecto urbanístico. 
Hago peritajes de vivienda y debo ver esos proyectos
5m4u9 (2017-06-01 21:08:16+00:00): qué interesante, por eso decía "creo" y no lo cambié. siempre es bueno preguntar...

ya me sonaba a eso, en cochabamba ocurre lo mismo. 

una consulta más. eso de abierta, ¿no estaría mal? o el nombre lleva así... en general casi ninguno lleva eso, pero quiza hay excepciones

en muchos casos es preferible asignar estas urbanizaciones abiertas como barrio, pero depende.