piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
wkdgs (2022-07-18 13:35:43+00:00): Hi,

bei deinen Änderungen sind leider ein paar Sachen schiefgelaufen. Könntest du da nochmal drüber schauen?

Das Problem ist, dass du von den Straßen die Tags "highway=residential" entfernt hast und sie deswegen nicht mehr angezeigt werden. Es muss ein "highway=*" vorhanden sein. Wenn "highway=residential" nicht passt, wäre "highway=service" eine gute Alternative.

Dann hast du noch den Tag "barrier=lift_gate" auf der gesamten Straße hinzugefügt. Das ist so leider nicht richtig. Die Schranken sind bereits korrekt als Punkte auf den Straßen angelegt. Du kannst die "barrier=lift_gate"-Tags also von den Straßen entfernen.

Um auszudrücken, dass der Zugang gesperrt ist, solltest du den "acces=private"-Tag ("access=no" ist hier die falsche Wahl) dort hinzufügen, wo er passt. Also an die beiden Schrankenpunkte und an den Teil der Straße, der gesperrt ist. Also wahrscheinlich an dem Teil zwischen den Schranken, der über das Grundstück verläuft. Die äußeren Straßenabschnitte sind bereits richtig mit "motor_vehicle=destination" getaggt.

Und zuletzt: Der "access=*"-Tag impliziert alle anderen Zugangsbeschränkungs-Tags wie "foot", "horse" und "bicycle". Für diese Tags müssen nur dann Werte eingetragen werden, wenn sie vom Wert des "access"-Tags abweichen.

Hier sind noch ein paar hilfreiche Wiki-Seiten dazu:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:highway%3Dservice
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:barrier
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access

Gruß
winkeldings
abakus_uploader (2022-07-18 22:31:42+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
wkdgs (2022-07-18 13:25:07+00:00): Wenn es komplett privat ist, passt "foot=yes" nicht so ganz. Ist es richtig, dass den Weg zu Fuß jeder ohne zu fragen benutzen darf?
wkdgs (2022-07-18 13:25:09+00:00): Wenn es komplett privat ist, passt "foot=yes" nicht so ganz. Ist es richtig, dass den Weg zu Fuß jeder ohne zu fragen benutzen darf?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123748557
user_6110846 (2022-07-18 08:12:18+00:00): чкалова перейменована у Затишна взято з телеграм каналу Декомунізація.Україна
решта перейменувань взято з кадастру
Frans S (2022-09-02 15:30:33+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123749926
willkmis (2022-07-19 23:27:31+00:00): Hello. I've noticed an apparently organized group from tomtom making edits like this. Can I ask what purpose these edits have? They're pretty minor, but you appear to have the goal of rounding off road corners. However, I don't really think this edit adds useful data, as the road here doesn't really curve like that. The sharp corners here are just an artifact of how dual carriageways are mapped in OSM. Do these changes improve your routing software somehow? And is this campaign documented somewhere?
NumisK (2022-07-25 15:06:42+00:00): Hi willkmis, thanks for reaching out. I was trying to add a few nodes to improve the alignment of the highway.
Littlebtc (2022-07-18 08:21:28+00:00): 莊大衛正確位置已開星巴克，故直接刪除 node
Dimitar155 (2022-07-18 12:12:12+00:00): Здравей,

И добре дошъл в OpenStreetMap. Благодаря ви за вашия принос. Единственото нещо, което трябва да поправиш, е да натискаш Q, след като изчертаеш дадена сграда, за да може ъглите да се коригират. Пиши ми ако имаш някакви въпроси.

Поздрави,
Митко
Frans S (2022-08-27 09:25:07+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).
Your mappings have been reverted and needs to be mapped all over again.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123750384
eggie (2022-07-19 10:00:05+00:00): Dag tinus.. Je vraagt feedback  Lijkt me oke zo.
.. maar beter niet schuiven met de kaart in editmodus. Je kunt er ook twee aparte uploads van maken. Schuiven geeft vaak schade met editor iD.
Groet
eggie
pyrog (2022-08-13 06:26:06+00:00): Salut Alexandre,

Merci pour ta mise à jour de la GTJ :)

Pour info, elle a "cassé" une relation du réseau de carrefours ("node network").
C'est l'itinéraire pédestre https://knooppuntnet.nl/fr/analysis/route/13672653/changes

Je corrige. N'hésite pas à échanger avec le groupe OSM Plein air : 
https://t.me/osmpleinair/18444

__
Yves
pyrog (2022-08-13 06:35:39+00:00): La relation GTJ à pied est aussi cassée
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=1750445&type=relation&map=16.0/46.1228/5.8495
pyrog (2022-08-13 07:31:22+00:00): Il y a aussi un problème sur ce chemin 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079399269#map=11/46.2479/5.9117
pyrog (2022-08-13 08:09:22+00:00): Oups, c'est moi qui a déplacé le nœud par erreur 

Correction : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2141944031/history
SekeRob (2022-07-18 08:35:09+00:00): NB Fell is a "non-rendering" feature in standard Carto maps opposed to heath.
Frans S (2022-09-17 09:27:32+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
It is too easy to copy-paste mappings. 
Please map each building precise and squared.
I revert most of your mappings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123750916
Frans S (2022-09-17 09:27:51+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
I am a Sr Validator and review mapped tasks at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to next points:
It is too easy to copy-paste mappings. 
Please map each building precise and squared.
I revert most of your mappings.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
Frans S
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123750916
kwiatek_123 (2022-07-21 20:31:31+00:00): Na pewno ten przejazd przy przystanku "Olszynka Grochowska" jest zamknięty? Dzisiaj wieczorem on normalnie funkcjonował i samochody jak i rowery przejeżdżały. Wiem, że wymieniają szyny w lesie i wymieniane tory ciągnął się do hali całopociągowej więc przypuszczam, że wymieniają szyny na dalszym przejeździe.
SzymonH (2022-07-22 06:36:07+00:00): W środę przejazd został otwarty, zapomniałem edytować. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/123922122
Frans S (2022-08-28 13:08:17+00:00): Please improve your mapping skills and don't make a mess of your mappings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123751094
*Martin* (2022-07-18 09:14:41+00:00): changesed description should be: survey along Muran - Hnusta
Frans S (2022-08-28 08:57:11+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123751883
OldManCelli (2022-10-04 21:32:02+00:00): Curious: When you add an abandoned rail that crosses a road do you think it is correct to add a railway=level_crossing?
The way that I was reading things it seems that abandoned rails don't need level crossings because the rails are no longer there?
OldManCelli (2022-10-04 21:32:38+00:00): example: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1079410266
archie (2022-07-18 09:10:07+00:00): Hej, de byggnader du ritar in är inte rätvinkliga. Du kan lätt få dem så om du markerar byggnaden och trycker tangenten "Q".
archie (2022-07-18 09:19:09+00:00): Här har du föresten en cheat sheet:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ID/Shortcuts
koovee (2022-07-18 10:06:36+00:00): Tack!
Jag redigerar inte så ofta och har tidigare mest använt JOSM, hade tänkt korrigera dessa senare. Men tack för tipset!
Frans S (2022-08-28 08:55:35+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. 

Reminder: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123752469
SebastienF (2022-08-20 09:55:17+00:00): the crossing 9894792655 doesn’t exists anymore, the BDOrtho is obsolete
KVI0n (2022-08-20 10:23:32+00:00): Hi, I thanks to you for information. I removed the crossing.
Frans S (2022-09-10 10:06:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).

B: Multiple buildings drawn as 1 building.


Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123753045
Frans S (2022-09-10 10:06:45+00:00): Please tag buildings just as 'building=yes' 
This the common tag for HOTOSM taggings
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123753045
user_5359 (2022-07-19 10:21:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have revert your SEO SPAM (mostly no standard keys, no verifiable data, not positive verifiable address data, destroying data). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data. For the most information in the description we have own keys. Please have look on the website http://wiki.openstreetmap.org.
mueschel (2022-08-05 17:56:51+00:00): Hi,
you added a few strange tags here:

  VZV = KÚ v Žiline č. 3/2003 z 12.6.2003 - 4. stupeň ochrany
  Úprava = Komisie SNR pre kultÚru a informácie č.3744/1967-osv. z 18.11.1967

Could you check that & change to common keys?
Filip009 (2022-08-05 18:45:35+00:00): Yes, it's part of related_law tag, but when I copy it from way to relation, JOSM has made a mistake and added it to new tag.
Filip009 (2022-09-05 16:02:07+00:00): repaired
wkdgs (2022-07-18 13:22:15+00:00): Hi, 

 willkommen bei OSM und Danke, dass du dabei hilfst die Karte zu verbessern.

Bist du sicher, dass der Tag "access=no" hier richtig ist? Meistens ist "access=private" die richtige Wahl. Wer darf das Tor denn benutzen und ist es vor Ort ausgeschildert?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/123753897
Findus Falke (2022-07-18 15:22:09+00:00): Hallo, ja, ich bin mir sicher. Um hier vom nordwestlichen zum südöstlochen Weg durchzukommen muss man durch einen Zaun und durch Brombeerranken klettern. Die meisten Leute laufen stattdessen über den Bahndamm, obwohl ein sicherer Weg die Kurt-Kresse-Straße entlang zur Dieskaustraße führt.
kogutowicz-mano (2022-07-21 10:11:27+00:00): Szia! Honnan származik az információ, hogy ennek az útnak nevet adott az önkormányzat?
mueschel (2022-08-05 18:28:07+00:00): Hi,
could you check this area, it got a strange "nr ewid." tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241233168
Bąbel (2022-08-07 09:17:31+00:00): Cześć.
Nr ewid. to pozycja w rejestrze :
Wykaz lądowisk wpisanych do ewidencji lądowisk 
na dzień 2 sierpnia 2022 r.
Stanowi o oficjalnym przeznaczeniu lądowiska - EMERGENCY.
Bąbel (2022-08-07 09:22:29+00:00): Opis:
 KARTUZY - SZPITAL /pomorskie/ śmigłowcowe 
(przyszpitalne)/
Powiatowe Centrum 
Zdrowia Sp. z o.o./
326/ 2015
mueschel (2022-08-07 09:39:08+00:00): Thanks!
Does this register have an official name? Then we could use the key
ref:XYZ
iWowik (2022-07-18 20:18:45+00:00): Не бегите впереди паровоза.
В name согласно wiki в настоящее время пишутся русские названия.
Буду откатывать
DD1GJ (2022-07-18 23:03:56+00:00): HelloOrangeJacket007,

welcome to OpenStreetMap and thank you for your contributions. You have given the Bing aerial photo as the source, but none of the new paths you have drawn in are recognisable on this aerial photo.

However, these paths correspond very precisely with Maps4BW [1]. This map series is often out of date in forests. Many paths have become overgrown and are no longer passable.

Anyone who still draws unchecked is considerably degrading the high quality level of OpenStreetMap!

Have you been there and seen the trails yourself?

Many greetings
Joachim

Contributor to the OSM quality control

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps4BW
DD1GJ (2022-07-20 07:13:54+00:00): Unfortunately, you haven't answered here yet.

So that there are no misunderstandings:

The community is happy about everyone who participates here with their local knowledge. Mistakes made by beginners are completely normal, and the community will of course help to correct them and avoid them in the future.

However, if comments and messages are not responded to, it is possible that all dubious changes will be undone.

Many greetings, Joachim
abakus_uploader (2022-07-18 22:31:43+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-07-18 22:31:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Karthoo (2022-07-22 18:55:49+00:00): Hello, I couldn't find any clue of the route in the part between the Black Forest and the Rhine. Is it even waymarked at all? If not, OSM would be the wrong place for this route.
Lejun (2022-07-23 07:39:23+00:00): From the intel I have, the route has been publicly opened a few days ago. I used the official GPX track to map the relation using nearest highways and haven’t surveyed it. Even without waymarks – yet? – I think OpenStreetMap could show it as it is an official route, similar to a state border. Given it’s my personal opinion, I’ll forward the case to members from french community to receive their comments on that matter. Feel free to share it to the german community so that we can reach an agreement and improve mapping practices.
Karthoo (2022-07-23 21:31:00+00:00): The German wiki is pretty clear on that topic: "A bicycle route is a chain of paths that is identified by a continuous marking as a bicycle route."
The English and French wiki also say in the first sentence: "Cycle routes or bicycle route are named or numbered or otherwise signed routes."
So apparently being signposted is the main criteria for a bike route.
Lejun (2022-07-24 06:26:16+00:00): Well, this cycle route is indeed named. Would a tag from the "unsigned" categorie be appropriate in this case?
Richard (2022-07-24 21:55:48+00:00): It shouldn't really be in OSM if it's not signposted. There are thousands of "my favourite cycle ride" routes out there in books, magazines, etc., often named.

At the very least it needs to be tagged as unsigned. Otherwise routers with turn-by-turn directions will say things like "Turn left onto Bio Velo Route", which is actively confusing if there aren't any signs. unsigned=yes on the relation is good for this.

But I agree with Karthoo, really it shouldn't be in OSM.
Richard (2022-07-24 21:57:26+00:00): (Where the English-language wiki pages say "named or numbered or otherwise signed", that means "signed with a name, or with a number, or with something else" (e.g. a symbol). It's using "otherwise" as an adjective. It doesn't mean "a named route without signing is ok".)
Luzandro (2022-07-25 04:39:15+00:00): besides: even for actually signposted routes it's problematic to just use some unknown GPX files. Even when ignoring the legal aspect, EuroVelo routes for example in some areas don't match what's actually signposted, only represent a proposed state without any infrastructure whatsoever or go along tracks that aren't even suitable to drive
streckenkundler (2022-07-25 19:39:10+00:00): Hello all.
If we all only include named, but not real on-site (!!) signposted cycle routes in OSM, we will become "Komoot 2.0" here. Do we want that? With the resulting data chaos, no one will be able to see through it...

Please leave such things out of OSM, use Komoot, umap and Co.

Thank you.

streckenkundler

PS: Translated with Deepl

(DE-Original-Version: Hallo zusammen.
Wenn wir alle nur benannte, aber nicht real vor Ort (!!) ausgeschilderte Radrouten in OSM aufnehmen, werden wir hier "Komoot 2.0". Wollen wir das? Bei dem dann entstehenden Datenchaos sieht dann erst recht keiner mehr durch...

Bitte sowas aus OSM herauslassen, Komoot, umap und Co. benutzen!

Danke.

streckenkundler)
Richard (2022-07-27 11:00:19+00:00): I have now tagged this as unsigned=yes which means that I can at least filter it out from cycle.travel. But I agree with streckenkundler and Karthoo that it should be deleted entirely.
Lejun (2022-07-28 04:09:42+00:00): I do agree with all the point made and with the relation deletion. Would it be possible to wait about or week before I do it? The matter was sent to both OSMWeekly – to make it reach more people who may find it easier to explore still existing elements – and the euro deputy – in order to know if the route will be signposted.
redd (2022-07-31 16:19:01+00:00): Hi Lejun,
thanks for agreeing to remove it. There is not need to wait. You can remove it right now. Please do it.
Even after deletion we will always be able to look at it, export it or restore it from the OSM history.
Thanks,
redd
Lejun (2022-08-01 05:38:59+00:00): No need for thanks. It’s only natural for me to take care of my mess after seeing how the community is torn about it.
abakus_uploader (2022-07-18 22:31:44+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-07-18 22:31:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!