piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
snake21 (2022-07-27 17:28:25+00:00): @Mmxcon they were originally not aligned to the roadbed at all
snake21 (2022-07-27 17:28:43+00:00): *MxxCon, apologies
pantufla (2023-11-07 16:06:20+00:00): Hola Alberto,

sobre este tipo de POI
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4055109690

Es un terminal automático o quizás esta etiqueta se corresponde mejor?


https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Tag:amenity%3Dpayment_centre
Warin61 (2022-07-27 23:41:32+00:00): Partly reverted to restore tree area.
rkurzawa (2022-07-28 07:30:00+00:00): Why? The trees have been bulldozed and no longer exist.
Warin61 (2022-07-29 08:27:06+00:00): The changeset only partially removed the area.. leaving some open ways still within the tree relation. This left the relation broken - hence my attention.  

Looking on Maxar the trees look to be where the relation says there are trees... see https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/580331831#map=17/-33.82928/150.92040
Warin61 (2022-07-29 08:33:14+00:00): Opps .. my error ... see https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7612147#map=16/-33.8256/150.9251
Note Mapovis is copyright .. so that cannot be used to map the development.
ivanbranco (2023-04-11 19:47:35+00:00): Hi shazomojah,

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081176356

is this a river or a stream?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:00:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
PT-53 (2022-07-27 05:57:00+00:00): Hallo fx99,
da in dem neuen Baugebiet ja bereits die Straßen fertig sind und auch bereits die ersten Gebäude gebaut werden, habe ich mir erlaubt das Baugebiet von
landuse=greenfield
auf
landuse=construction  +
construction=residential 
abzuändern.
Außerdem habe ich die Fläche des Baugebietes anhand des Bebauungsplanes der Gemeinde überarbeitet.
Grüße
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
Scottie0001 (2022-07-27 05:32:16+00:00): Hello, just wanting to know what is your source for the address data?
AnnonKelly (2022-07-27 05:40:27+00:00): Hi, this has previously been communicated directly on Discord.
maraf24 (2022-07-27 08:16:19+00:00): Wandalizm wycofany.
maraf24 (2022-07-27 08:17:40+00:00): Wycofane.
TheSwavu (2022-08-09 04:40:41+00:00): Hi,

Closed polygon highways like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/512427877 need to have an area=yes tag. 

Thanks.
Warin61 (2022-07-27 23:56:30+00:00): No cigar. Boundary broken, restored back to DCS Base Map.
SafetyIng (2022-07-28 10:02:16+00:00): Hi, Thanks for your contributions. In the future consider synchronising StreetComplete before travelling long distances, to avoid large changeset areas. More information: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Thanks in advance!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124121470
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-02-20 10:30:46+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29020459/history has 2=1 key that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What you intended to express by using this unusual key? Is this tag needed? Or maybe can it be expressed in a more typical way that would be easier to understand?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-05-05 12:01:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 135738831 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some MAPS.ME personal markers.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/7111
arte2002 (2022-07-30 21:12:55+00:00): Hola adrianbenedited

Revierto algunos datos desactualizados del catastro

Tendrías que ser más cuidadoso con tus ediciones, eliminas datos existentes y los reemplazas por edificios sin mirar si realmente existen

Tendrías que mirar las imágenes de PNOA de España, los datos del Catastro parece que están desactualizados
VlIvYur (2022-08-26 12:49:06+00:00): Откуда тут велосипеды?Знаков никаких нет
Mateusz Konieczny (2023-11-15 17:33:29+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1837859201

shop=storage ? Is it simply a shop=storage_rental? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%253Dstorage_rental Or is it selling boxes/packaging?
skyper (2022-08-04 11:00:50+00:00): Hallo obk-theo07
Warum trennst Du denn die Wege an jeder Kreuzung auf?
Das ist doch nur nötig, wenn sich Merkmale ändern oder nur ein Teil als Mitglied in eine Relation aufgenommen wird.
Fragende Grüße,
skyper
Mingwei (2022-07-27 06:45:56+00:00): Down to Noriega
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:16:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:35:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:33:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
yashar turanli (2022-07-27 07:14:58+00:00): In the local and original language of the people of the region, which is Turkish, the correct name of this street is called "Qirakh Ayaq".
bkil (2022-07-27 12:09:04+00:00): Szeretnék érdeklődni, hogy mi a név forrása? A Totál utcának miért csak ezen szakasza van felvéve? Végig ki van táblázva? Az ide vezető keresztutcáknak nincs neve?
somix (2022-07-27 12:58:23+00:00): Hello, the tag level=0 is used for POIs on the first floor. Are they really on the second floor?
DD1GJ (2022-07-27 08:48:28+00:00): Sorry, da war noch ein Punkt in Hessen im Editor, daher ist der Bereich so grroß geworden.
mcliquid (2022-09-05 06:53:01+00:00): Hallo Wolfgang, hast du eine schriftliche Genehmigung von KOMPASS, dass du deren Kartenmaterien in unsere Datenbank integrieren darfst? Zumindest fehlt das Dokument noch hier auf der Wiki-Seite: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Austria

Viele Grüße
wolfgang nister (2022-09-05 07:04:03+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Eben dieser Punkt, dass KOMPASS-Material nicht zu verwenden ist, hat mich am 1. bis gestern 4.9. zu einer örtlichen Begehung aller Änderungen bewogen. Kann ich den Änderungssatz nachträglich auf "Begehung aus September 2022" ändern?
mcliquid (2022-09-05 07:08:37+00:00): Leider nein. Aber zumindest wäre hier in den Kommentaren belegt, dass du kein fremdes Kartenmaterial kopiert hast.
LockOnGuy (2022-07-27 08:37:32+00:00): Why did you remove the Arabic name?
LockOnGuy (2022-07-27 08:37:16+00:00): Why did you remove the Arabic name?
LockOnGuy (2022-07-27 08:36:42+00:00): Why did you remove the Arabic name?
Frans S (2022-08-29 14:35:47+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
Your mappings include multiple buildings. Each building should be mapped individually.
A: buildings not always accurately drawn and squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).




Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124127891
Becky Candy (2022-08-03 09:22:16+00:00): Well mapped but hit each corner of the buildings and  please square your buildings after tagging them by pressing 'q' on your keyboard. Keep up the mapping - many thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124128050
Becky Candy (2022-08-03 10:50:08+00:00): Thanks for mapping. You might need to zoom right in to clearly see if there are existing buildings that have already been mapped before you start adding buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124128050
Becky Candy (2022-08-03 10:52:59+00:00): Thanks for mapping. Next time, you can improve by avoiding mapping several buildings as one building. Every building must be traced separately. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124128050
RicoElectrico (2022-07-27 11:01:01+00:00): Cześć, do czego to wejście? Na mapie OSM nie ma tu żadnego obiektu, choć wygląda to jak szkoła na zdjęciach lotniczych. Nie znalazłem informacji jaka szkoła jest pod tym adresem.
RicoElectrico (2022-07-27 11:01:53+00:00): Dla uściślenia - AED jest dodany poprawnie, chcę po prostu wykorzystać Twoją wiedzę :)
wielandb (2022-07-27 09:40:43+00:00): Hoppala, das habe ich verbockt. 😫
Danke fürs korrigieren!
kartonage (2022-07-27 09:52:35+00:00): Kein Ding.
Im Bereich Chemnitz hätte ich noch ein Paar die ich mir angucken wollte zum optimieren/ausbessern. Würde ich mir später aber nochmal anschauen.
eggie (2022-07-27 08:51:39+00:00): Dag Langebrink..   De tourism=camp_site heb ik van het rustpunt zelf even verwijderd. Dan zie je weer het kopje koffie.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-07-27 08:52:01+00:00): even ctrl-f5 een paar keer voor het effect.
Frans S (2022-08-29 14:38:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Your mappings include multiple buildings. Each building should be mapped individually. Your mappings will be reverted.
If you have mapped on a similar way on other tasks, they will be reverted as well.



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124128446
DD1GJ (2022-07-27 09:02:21+00:00): Bitte unterlasse das Ändern der Wege in der Kernzone, siehe https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=75807

Diese "Methode der Unsichtbaren Wege" wird bundesweit praktiziert und verhindert, dass komplett gelöscht wird.

Ich werde diese erneute Änderung auch zurücksetzen. Solltest Du weitermachen, lasse ich Deinen Account sperren.
Carto'Cité (2022-12-20 17:18:01+00:00): Bonjour JRL50,
J'ai apporté quelques modifications sur cet aménagement :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081700296
Il semble qu'il s'agit d'une voie verte avec la signalétique C115. J'ai corrigé dans ce sens en passant en passant highway=path + foot=designated +bicycle=designated +traffic_sign=FR:C115.
J'ai également supprimé le nom qui est celui de l'itinéraire et pas de l'aménagement en lui-même. D’ailleurs il n'est pas encore de la relation de l'EV4 ni de la V40.
J'ai un peu amélioré la géoémtrie avec le fond Maxar assez à jour et de la heatmap Strava.
J'ai aussi identifié cette portion : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1123690661
Si tu passes par là régulièrement n’hésite pas à faire quelques photos pour Mapillary pour qu'on voie si on peut améliorer encore les choses :)
À ta disposition pour en discuter.
Charles de Carto’Cité pour #VeloNormandie
Frans S (2022-08-29 12:54:17+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:


Your mappings include multiple buildings. Each building should be mapped individually. Your mappings will be reverted.
If you have mapped on a similar way on other tasks they will be reverted as well.
What I notice that you make it very easy for yourself by copying the same mapping despite the objects are different



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124128914
mfdz (2023-04-19 16:35:25+00:00): Hi, inwiefern handelt es sich bei den GAT-Parkplätzen um P&R-Parkplätze (park_ride=yes)?
josmougn (2024-06-12 13:56:27+00:00): bonjour
CVCB et shared-lanes ce n'est pas la même chose.
La façon de taguer une CVCB dans osm est particulièrement tordue et mal choisie mais hélas le coup est parti : cycleway=lane + lanes=1 + oneway=no et personnellement j'ajoute une note="CVCB chaucidou ce ne sont pas des bandes cyclables".

Par ailleurs, il me semble qu'il n'y a pas d'aménagement sur cette section : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24359052
Ken ar wech all
José
kurisubrooks (2022-07-27 14:22:48+00:00): Hi there. This area is still colloquially known as Jordan Springs East, hence the neighbourhood node in place of suburb, so I wanted to request justification for this edit as it seems improper? The name is only colloquially known and is referred to by the developer of the area but isn't part of the NSW GNB database, but we're discussing in the OSM World Discord currently whether it would just be better to move the current Jordan Springs suburb node closer to the centre of the suburb bounds instead.
aurion45 (2022-07-27 20:01:54+00:00): Well it be earmark to change so why all the fuss.
kurisubrooks (2022-07-27 20:05:27+00:00): Because that document is from 2019 and all of its contents have already been applied/updated in OpenStreetMap when it was released. This change was unnecessary as the neighbourhood name has not changed.
aurion45 (2022-07-27 21:40:52+00:00): OK change it back, please.
DD1GJ (2022-07-27 09:08:03+00:00): Vandalism reverted
eggie (2022-12-06 15:08:41+00:00): check

psv yes is overigens default op wegen
Patchanka (2022-07-27 13:42:57+00:00): bonjour
merci pour les ajouts.
Pouvez-vous s'il vous plait être un peu plus explicite dans vos commentaires de changements ? Cela permet aux autres contributeurs de mieux comprendre ce que vous faites :-)
Quelques rappels ici : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Bons_commentaires_de_groupe_de_modifications
pza (2022-07-28 11:59:49+00:00): I agree building=detached isn't correct, but it does need a building tag.  What about simply building=yes?
marc__marc (2022-08-30 08:24:06+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/436235534
il y a un problème de logique car vous avez renseigné que c'est payant et payant en journée. j'imagine que vous vouliez dire que c'était grauit sauf pendant cette horaire ou payant sauf pendant cette horaire
Cordialement,
Marc
Kazing (2022-08-30 18:04:39+00:00): Bonjour,
En effet, erreur de syntaxe corrigé en "fee:conditional=no @ (20:00-08:00)"
voir changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125581789

Merci d'avoir remarqué  :)
Cordialement,
Johann-Christoph Jacob (2022-07-27 22:38:57+00:00): maxspeed:type muss doch DEːurban sein, da Streckenverbot 30 aufgehoben und innerorts von Norgaardholz.
Britzz (2024-03-25 21:12:51+00:00): bonjour @josmougn : via ce changeset "corrections de notes" tu as créé un surprenant escalier en pleine nature (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1081719113) qui fait lui-même maintenant l'objet d'une note :-) : https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4059723
si tu penses qu'il s'agit d'une fausse manip...
josmougn (2024-03-25 21:32:00+00:00): Bonjour,
Non, pas de fausse manip. C'est l'accès à ce point : https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9914237895
Je corrige la note dans la foulée.
user_15552334 (2022-07-27 21:48:44+00:00): .
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124132315
Josef73 (2023-01-11 19:30:34+00:00): Hello, can you check the value of the tag opening_hours? Thanks.
Glassman (2023-01-11 20:06:13+00:00): fixed - The original opening hours were from an SEO. I got the current ones from their website
alessandrocarmeli (2022-07-27 11:48:31+00:00): Grazie mille, chiedo scusa per l'errore
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-31 08:06:17+00:00): Just a test?
pitscheplatsch (2022-07-31 08:06:33+00:00): Test failed - Looks like #vandalism and should be reverted?
Glassman (2022-08-02 20:03:42+00:00): I reverted this edit. Please just don't drag a building outline to another building. You can copy the tags to the correct building. Also the opening_hours tag is using the wrong format as well as the phone numbers.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124133285
eggie (2022-07-27 12:19:17+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback De info heb ik samengevoegd met de bestaande adresnode
MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
user_5359 (2022-07-28 11:39:01+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO Spam. If this is an error, please give the correct information, we can help you to find the correct tags. See https://wiki.osm.org
Allison P (2022-07-30 05:28:58+00:00): Why are there so many with this particular and completely incorrect formatting?

It looks like a real entry, just not tagged appropriately.
user_2066394 (2022-07-28 14:05:46+00:00): Sieht man das in Bing?
user_12500175 (2022-07-28 14:08:33+00:00): Ne noch nicht , war vor Ort
user_12500175 (2022-07-28 14:21:10+00:00): Habs korrigiert,
eggie (2022-07-27 12:22:51+00:00): Dag ibakker.. van name= heb ik even description= gemaakt.
Alleen geografische en bv bedrijfsnamen als name- tag gebruiken.
Geen omschrijvingen.
MVG
eggie
bxl-forever (2022-07-27 18:04:35+00:00): Hello,

Would you please be so kind as to explain what you are attempting to change on the map here?

You merely named your latest 3 changeset "juist", "yes" and "juist".

I see you are removing lots of items, moving roads, and changing highway types.  AFAIK, major changes like this should be discussed within the local community before processing.  Some of the changes appear to be short-term road closures, which we normally do not include in OSM (or not like this).

Thanks in advance.  You can write down here.
joost schouppe (2022-11-23 14:14:36+00:00): Hi bxl-forever, I think this one should be looked at in some more detail. The deletion of way 39093364 looks like pure vandalism to me
DD1GJ (2022-07-27 12:13:29+00:00): alle vorhergehenden Änderungen zurückgesetzt, siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6159
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:50:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
highflyer74 (2022-07-28 16:34:57+00:00): Kleiner Hinweis hier:

ein name:de=* ist nicht notwendig. Das Standardtag für einen Eigennamen ist name=*. Dieses wird für die vor Ort übliche Sprache genutzt. Gibt es mehrere Sprachen, kommen die von dir verwendeten Namensvarianten zum Einsatz.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2023-01-27 16:17:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 131779437, 131779414, 131779448, 131779428, 131779443, 131779417, 131779421, 131775334, 131779434 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some undiscussed imports.  See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6789 ; which was ignored and the imports moved to another account, hence this revert
highflyer74 (2022-07-28 16:32:25+00:00): Moin!

Hier wurde ein Grasstück benamt. Da anscheinend nur der Strand so heißt (welcher bereits den Namen trägt), würde ich vorschlagen, den Namen hier wieder zu entfernen. Spricht etwas dagegen?

Gruss aus HB!
highflyer74 (2022-07-28 07:26:53+00:00): Auch hier noch einmal der Hinweis (er wurde dir bereits in der Vergangenheit durch einen anderen Mapper gegeben):

Verwende name=* bitte nur für Dinge, die auch einen Namen haben. Diese Wiese hat nicht den Namen "Wiese".

Auch ist die Wiese nicht per Post erreichbar, deshalb bekommt sie auch keine Adresse.

Bitte beachte die Hinweise, die wir dir geben und vor allem: stelle Fragen, wenn du dir nicht sicher bist.

Danke!
parsd51 (2022-07-31 22:59:38+00:00): Hej Niels

Jeg ser du udskifter en del cycleway med path.
Hvad er dine kriterier for det?

F.eks. i området omkring bebyggelsen her:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/44779877/history#map=17/56.18390/9.55263

Hilsen
Per
Niels Elgaard Larsen (2022-08-01 10:52:01+00:00): Det er som regel fordi jeg mener at det er fællesstier. Ofte fordi jeg kan se at det er skiltet på Mapaillary eller Kartaview billeder. Så bliver det highway=path,foot=designated,bicycle=designated, segregated=no (eller yes), som er "combined foot and cycleway" i JOSM)

For Lupinvej, så er det jo stier, som er den eneste måde, beboerne kan komme til deres egne trappeopgange, og så mener jeg ikke, at det kan være cykelstier.

Man kan se på SDFE, at der er cykelparkering i starten af stierne og når man har parkeret sin cykel, så går man jo resten af vejen. Så jeg mener at stierne overvejende er beregnet til trafik til fods, inklusiv kørestole, rollators, slæbning af indkøb, barnevogne, børn på vej til legepladsen, osv og så er det ikke en cykelsti.

Men nu jeg på SDFE at der faktisk er to varevogne på stierne, så måske skulle det være highway=service, access=private, for jeg tænker at det må være håndværkere eller lignende, der har fået tilladelse til at køre der.
osmviborg (2022-08-01 14:18:26+00:00): Den med path har været diskuteret mange gange, jeg bryder mig heller ikke om den; men det er lige efter bogen https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dpath#Usage_as_a_universal_tag
parsd51 (2022-08-01 15:13:28+00:00): Tak for forklaringen, jeg kan godt forstå din tankegang og er sådan set af samme generelle opfattelse i min egen sondering mellem cykelsti og sti.

Jeg spørger fordi, det for mig, ud fra dokumentationen, er det samme at tagge:
cycleway (bicycle designated implicit), foot designated som
path, bicycle designated, foot designated

I forhold til dokumentationen bruges designated kun når det blå skilt er der, ellers primær brug og “ikke forbudt brug” (f.eks. footway og bicycle yes)

Hvis den primære brug (ingen blå skilte) er for gående, men cykling ikke forbudt vil jeg bruge footway og bicycle yes. Håndværker specialtilfældet synes jeg vi skal se bort fra.