piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
532910 (2021-01-24 10:10:24+00:00): на бинге нет "входа в тоннель"
532910 (2021-01-24 10:11:12+00:00): на бинге есть просто здание, откуда информация, что это вход?
Oksion (2021-01-24 10:41:14+00:00): https://web.archive.org/web/20131009082552/http://www.metro-style.ru/content/51/realizovannye-proekty/kompleks-podzemnyh-sooruzhenii-dlja-pansionata-v-g-gelendzhik-krasnodarskogo-kraja.html

Вот тут есть чертежи (схемы) подземных сооружений, там на них видно, если их разместить на местности. Это данные компании Метростиль которая занималась сооружением данного подземного комплекса
532910 (2021-01-25 00:49:51+00:00): То же самое:

На нём нет информации о лицензии. Если лицензия на данные неизвестна, то его нельзя использовать в OpenStreetMap.

https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility

Позволяет ли источник использовать свои данные в OpenStreetMap?
mavl (2021-01-25 03:09:38+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
Данные по этой ссылке защищены авторским правом и не могут быть использованы без явного разрешения в OpenStreetMap.  
  

1990—2013 © Проектная компания «Метро-Стиль» | Москва, ул. Мурановская, д. 5,
тел.: +7 (495) 640-04-80, факс: +7 (495) 640-04-81
Oksion (2021-01-25 06:15:18+00:00): Ок, постараюсь связаться с Генеральным директором компании (ныне не существующей Метро-Стиль) для получения разрешений, а пока исправлю подземные объекты для лицензионной чистоты.
mavl (2021-01-25 06:24:47+00:00): @ Oksion  
Спасибо.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:47:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:32:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
VA00 (2021-02-24 06:40:28+00:00): Dojazdy do domów prostopadłe do ul. PCK nie posiadają nazwy PCK.
SomeoneElse (2021-01-23 12:26:51+00:00): Hello Bolt003,

If you're updating OSM on behalf of https://bolt.eu/en/ , I'd expect Bolt to be following:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing_Guidelines

which would mean that for any project that you work on an entry is created at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities and anyone who works on one of those projects has an entry in their profile, so that someone who navigates from a changeset of yours to https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Bolt002 would know about that project (and also what “Bolt” is, in case they do not know).

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM’s Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 13:44:11+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108531843 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from the Thailand OSM community, reverting some well-meaning but poor-quality edits from a few months ago (mapper long gone).
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 13:44:14+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108531843 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from the Thailand OSM community, reverting some well-meaning but poor-quality edits from a few months ago (mapper long gone).
zuicz (2021-01-20 16:13:25+00:00): no dobra, niech ci będzie xD
C2oc4 (2021-01-20 18:07:48+00:00): No Geoportal tak mówi :p
zuicz (2021-01-22 20:05:34+00:00): A Geoportal nie bierze czasem warstwy dróg z OSM?
C2oc4 (2021-01-23 11:58:46+00:00): Wiesz co chyba nie bo były tam drogi których turaj nawet nie widziało ale moge się mylić
highflyer74 (2021-01-21 07:51:25+00:00): Noch eine kleine Anmerkung hier, wenn Du gestattest:

Bitte lösche nach Möglichkeit keine Objekte, um sie danach neu einzuzeichnen. Die Gebäudeumrisse waren 2013 gemappt worden. Es gibt Möglichkeiten, diese gleichmässig in Einzelgebäude zu unterteilen. Durch das Löschen verlieren wir die Objekthistorie, und das sollte vermieden werden.

Zu Gebäuden generell: Ein Reihenhaus ist ein building=house. building=terrace wird nur für grosse Gebäudeumrisse verwendet, die mehrere Reihenhäuser umfassen (z.B. so wie die von Dir gelöschten). Wenn Gebäude einzeln gemappt sind, ändert sich das (nachlesen kannst Du das im Wiki unter https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building).

Sei so nett, Dir die untenstehenden Links einmal durchzulesen, damit Du eine Idee davon bekommst, wie OSM funktioniert:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
highflyer74 (2021-01-21 07:59:26+00:00): Entschuldige, wenn ich Dich gerade etwas vollschütte, aber mit fiel noch auf, dass Du teilweise Adress-Bestandteile an Gebäude taggst, die gar keine Adresse haben. Lass die am besten einfach weg, denn in OSM erfassen wir Adressen möglichst nur einmal, und meistens ist es das Hauptgebäude, welches diese bekommt. Danke!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:25:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:22:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
eggie (2021-01-20 09:58:56+00:00): Lijkt me oke zo.. 
mapse
eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:25:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
highflyer74 (2021-01-21 07:39:04+00:00): Moin!

Da Du noch nicht so lange dabei bist, will ich hier gern ein paar Tipps loswerden:

- Wenn Du neue Gebäude hinzufügst, sei so nett, sie nach dem Zeichnen rechtwinklig zu machen. Das geht im Editor per Knopfdruck. 

- Schau Dir bitte auch die Verbindungen bzw. Nicht-Verbindungen zu anderen Gebäuden an. Teilweise ist ein Node mit dem nebenstehenden Gebäude verbunden, aber der andere nicht. Lasse Dir lieber mehr Zeit, die Dinge sauber zu mappen.

- Für Garagen gibt es zwei unterschiedliche Tags: einmal building=garage (für eine einzelne Garage) und building=garages (für ein Objekt, welches mehrere Garagen darstellt).

- Versuche, etwas aussagekräftigere Änderungssatzkommentare zu nutzen. Statt "Vor Ort überprüft" wäre hier "Garagen hinzugefügt" sinnvoller.

Wenn Du Fragen hast, melde Dich gern.

Viele Grüße!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:35:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-27 17:16:09+00:00): Ciao, l'osmc:symbol inserito su questa relazione è errato. Ciao, Andrea
Ezio Michelis (2021-12-27 18:07:00+00:00): Non trovo nessun errore, mi puoi dire come scriveresti tu? Grazie Ezio
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-27 18:12:16+00:00): Nel sentiero A02, nell'osmc: symbol l'identificativo inserito è 000. Ciao, Andrea
Ezio Michelis (2021-12-28 10:31:20+00:00): Grazie Andrea, ieri sera ha corretto il mio maestro. Ezio
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:39:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
DD1GJ (2021-01-20 23:58:24+00:00): Hallo mosaikeule,

der Eintrag einer Ferienwohnung in dieser Form ohne Kontaktmöglichkeit (Telefon und/oder Webseite, aber kein Buchungsortal) bringt der OSM-Datenbak nicht viel, insbesondere wen der Vermieter dort nicht wohnt. Hier wäre es https://www.ferieninwuestenrot.de/fewo-am-spatzenwald

Die Webseite butte mit mit vorangestelltem https;// damit gleich eine verschlüsselte Verbindung aufgebaut wird wenn der Server https unterstützt.
UrSuS (2022-03-07 07:47:05+00:00): Rikšotāju iela is oneway to Cash & Carry
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:22:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:50:54+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
Dimacn (2021-01-20 10:27:08+00:00): Пожалуйста не добавляйте на карту несуществующие замки. Если вы хотите отметить электроподстанции используйте теги power=substation и substation=minor_distribution Т.к. одноимённые электроподстанции уже отмечены на карте, ваша правка отменена.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:38:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:28:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-28 20:54:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 108776146, 108778638 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some allegedly Google-derived and otherwise poor edits in the Philippines and Nigeria.  See https://github.com/OSMPH/papercut_fix/issues/83 , https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2021-July/006788.html et al
eggie (2021-01-20 11:19:29+00:00): Dag rar   Op een highway=footway hoort geen tracktype=grade1.. Dat is een specificatie die bij een highway=track hoort. Kijk je nog even?

Je edits
https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=97828858

MVG
eggie
rar@eu (2021-01-20 20:44:46+00:00): Hoi Eggie,

Dan zou de tracktype tag eigenlijk weg moeten, die is niet geldig voor dit stukje pad. Dat is wat ik begrijp uit de wiki page voor key:tracktype
 
aangepast in JOSM
gr Rene
eggie (2021-01-20 20:47:41+00:00): Precies Rene... 
Die regel kan weg.. of het moet natuurlijk wel een track zijn. 😀
De edit is van een voorgaande mapper.
Up to you
Mvg
Eggie
rivermont (2021-12-21 23:42:14+00:00): Is there a reason that Wetlands Reserve in TN is broken up into so many little bits?
rivermont (2021-12-21 23:47:47+00:00): And actually looking at the Wikipedia page it looks like there's not even a wetland reserve there, its private property?
Shawn Noble (2021-12-22 03:22:01+00:00): Based on data and research I had made while looking into this it appeared as if each of the separate sections were indeed separate entities. Admittedly, research on this was not great as details are sparring. Discussion had been made via Slack regarding this as well. Consensus was not reached. Typically these wetlands reserves are private property that has a IUCN designation, which is itself noteworthy enough for inclusion.
As with any edit on OSM, if you reasonably believe this can be improved upon please feel free to make appropriate changes.
dvdhoven (2021-01-20 13:50:59+00:00): Alle knooppunten en alle routes moeten de tag network:type=node_network krijgen.
Zie ook de meldingen in knooppuntnet.nl https://knooppuntnet.nl/nl/analysis/hiking/nl/facts/NetworkExtraMemberNode

Verder is ID absoluut en totaal ongeschikt om met routes te werken. Als je met routes wilt werken is er maar één tool, JOSM.
ID plaatst nieuwe members altijd achteraan in de routes en dat is vaak niet de plek waar je ze wilt hebben. Met ID kun je members ook niet in de route verplaatsen of op een bepaalde plek neerzitten. Ook het splitsen en kopiëren kan niet met ID. Bij het splitsen van wegen verstoort ID de volgorde in de routes. Dat moet dan door een mapper met JOSM verholpen worden.

Vriendelijke groeten,
Dick van den Hoven
gvb (2021-01-20 15:03:17+00:00): Hoi Dick,
Dank voor je bericht, het was niet de bedoeling routes te verstoren. Ik zal de knopen aanpassen en me in JOSM verdiepen.
Kovoschiz (2021-01-20 12:20:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97829879
Kovoschiz (2021-01-20 12:20:22+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97829879
ToniE (2021-01-20 10:54:03+00:00): Hi Phil31,

hmm, ich glaube, das müssen wir anders modellieren.

Momentan ist es für alle gesperrt: access=no

ich denke, 

Löschen: access=no und motor_vehicle=no und horse=no

Hinzu: oneway:bicycle=no und oneway:psv=no und oneway:emergency=no

Korrektur: lanes=3

Gruß,
Toni
Phil31 (2021-01-21 12:19:14+00:00): Hi Toni,
ok, super vielen Dank fürs Ändern.
Grüße Phil
abakus_uploader (2021-01-20 23:31:12+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
Piskvor (2021-01-20 16:45:39+00:00): Posun chodníků (zjevně omylem) jsem vrátil.
Kovoschiz (2021-01-20 12:20:03+00:00): 1. It's not necessary to delete `network=nwn`. 
2. `gns:*=` is specifically for a US data system. `MRGS=` won't be a bad 1st choice, being in a few tens uses.
HTC_TM8 (2021-01-21 02:23:15+00:00): Thank you for information
That mean it  is good enough for added MGRS?
Sanniu (2021-02-23 13:33:30+00:00): Hi, the https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/58316540 is line without a type now. Can you look what happened?
zstadler (2021-02-23 15:08:20+00:00): I'm a bit confused. 

The link is to a way deleted 7 yeats ago, and not by me.
Sanniu (2021-02-23 15:10:11+00:00): My bad, the real link is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/583165402.
Sorry for confusion.
zstadler (2021-02-24 07:20:27+00:00): This was the inacurate version of the road, which was replaces in this changeset.
I just deleted it in changeset 99881052.

Thanks for letting me know!
!bm (2021-01-20 21:12:28+00:00): Hallo masix,

da war wohl der Wurm drinnen – gleich drei unnötige Multipolygone, ein Park im Park (der schon zuvor bestand, evt wolltest du das Problem lösen?), ein Platz ohne Namen? 

Ich habe da mal aufgeräumt und bei der Gelegenheit ein paar weitere Dinge berichtigt/ergänzt: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97861255

--besteGrüße!bm
muchichka_s (2021-01-20 12:55:23+00:00): In Ukraine, as well as almost all over the world, in the wiki recommendations to use the post_code tag instead of addr:postcode for boundaries. addr:postcode used only for end objects with addresses (e.g. houses). Please roll back your change
muchichka_s (2021-01-20 12:57:36+00:00): Oh, I'm sorry I made a typo in writing. Then I'll roll back it myself
SekeRob (2021-01-20 15:12:59+00:00): OK, me bad, was unaware postal_code was something for a boundaries area. Never seen it used here, but now that I know it's useful to drawing zip code areas. Have duly bookmarked https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:postal_code 

Have a nice day.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-18 17:36:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106601431 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some suspected vandalism in Bosnia.
ElliottPlack (2021-05-14 13:41:22+00:00): Hello there Amazon editor. The entrance road to that assisted living place is best tagged as service, rather than residential, because it is not a named street. Otherwise, keep up the good work.
kmarifo (2021-05-17 08:22:50+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for providing the information and correcting the edit. Apologies for the wrong edit. Looking forward to learn more from you.

Regards,
kmarifo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-18 17:36:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106601431 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some suspected vandalism in Bosnia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-06-18 17:36:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 106601431 where the changeset comment is: Following a report to the DWG, reverting some suspected vandalism in Bosnia.
dieterdreist (2022-03-18 11:18:12+00:00): Ciao Dino Michelini,

cambierei il "name" nel nome italiano. Il resto rimarebbe (compreso name:it se vogliamo), cosa ne pensi?

Ciao,
Martin
dieterdreist (2022-03-18 11:18:55+00:00): scusa, mi riferisco a questo: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/12213226
Dino Michelini (2022-03-18 11:33:09+00:00): Ciao, avevo posto name in inglese perché considerato che si tratta di un sito UNESCO avesse più "visibilità" sulla mappa. D'altra parte è formalmente  corretto quello che scrivi… A questo punto si potrebbe aggiungere qualche altra lingua ad es. quelle riportate su http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1133/ (arabo, cinese, russo, spagnolo e aggiungerei il tedesco)
dieterdreist (2022-03-29 21:49:45+00:00): va benissimo, pensavo lo facessi ;-)
muchichka_s (2021-01-20 13:10:30+00:00): What is the reason for changing the type of road? In Ukraine, T-roads are marked as secondary!
amorphisss (2021-01-20 13:20:27+00:00): Right! But these are no longer T - roads. This road was excluded from the list of territorial roads.
https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/55-2019-%D0%BF#Text
muchichka_s (2021-01-20 13:22:08+00:00): Розібрався цю дорогу винесли з Т-доріг. А Ви можете на майбутнє не видаляти ref і зв'язки, а переносити їх в old_ref. Дуже часто цим дорогам дають просто новий номер О-номер. Якщо буде збережений old_ref це буде простіше зробити
amorphisss (2021-01-20 13:26:47+00:00): Не знав про цей нюанс, домовились
SomeoneElse_Revert (2021-07-24 13:44:13+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 108531843 where the changeset comment is: Following a request from the Thailand OSM community, reverting some well-meaning but poor-quality edits from a few months ago (mapper long gone).
rskedgell (2021-01-20 15:26:24+00:00): Is it worth changing junction=roundabout to razed:junction=roundabout as well, so it won't be picked up by queries and QA tools looking for roundabouts?
spiregrain (2021-01-20 15:28:35+00:00): good shout.
spiregrain (2021-01-20 15:30:58+00:00): All we need now is a good source for the shape of the kerbs in front of Maryland Station and Ibex House.
Mordechai23 (2021-01-21 18:10:13+00:00): Cześć, w tym zestawie dodałeś trawnik z tagiem name=trawnik. Tag name= służy jednak do oznaczania nazw własnych, a nie opisów pospolitych elementów mapy i ich cech - np. nie dodajemy nazw "las brzozowy", "łąka za wzgórzem", "moje osiedle" etc.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Key:name

Jeśli miałbyś jakieś wątpliwości to śmiało pisz wiadomość ;)
user_3022894 (2021-01-20 11:40:26+00:00): Quellen: Esri und Bing.
532910 (2021-01-23 21:58:53+00:00): какой источник этих данных?
Oksion (2021-01-24 10:06:00+00:00): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UoBCd9qtl7c9cfRkDwXG4qGtYhPM5Mjz/view
mavl (2021-01-24 15:40:50+00:00): @Oksion  
  
Если не трудно, напишите, из какого источника взят этот документ. На нём нет информации о лицензии. Если лицензия на данные неизвестна, то его нельзя использовать в OpenStreetMap.  
  
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Licence_Compatibility  
  
Позволяет ли источник использовать свои данные в OpenStreetMap?
Oksion (2021-01-24 16:37:43+00:00): В качестве источника данных не использовался импорт или непосредственное копирование, использовалось только название. Название это не то что что при добавлении в OSM может быть несовместимо с лицензией OpenStreetMap которая запрещает прямое импортирование данных из источников с несовместимой лицензией (например линий, точек и т.д.). Данная информация выложена на сайте https://palace.navalny.com/ (публичный доступ). Более того информация о внутреннем содержимым помещения предоставлена на сайте википедии https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A0%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BD%D1%86%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%BD%D0%B0_%D0%BC%D1%8B%D1%81%D0%B5_%D0%98%D0%B4%D0%BE%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BF%D0%B0%D1%81 импорт из которой вполне возможен
Something B (2021-03-17 11:08:12+00:00): IMHO, если план не был скопирован в OSM (внесли только название), то проблем с авторскими правами быть не должно (они не затронуты) и доступность или недоступность плана под совместимой лицензией не имеет значения.
BCNorwich (2021-01-21 08:41:06+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I just wanted to let you know that some sections of paths in the maze have been duplicated by your method of drawing. Doubling back on a line to extend a path in a different direction is self-intersecting on itself thereby causing two lines to be drawn on the same path. Instead of doubling back please draw several lines, this is OSM practice.

If you need help rectifying this area please just ask in the comment box here.

Regards Bernard
BCNorwich (2021-01-23 10:37:23+00:00): No response so I've corrected the obvious faults of duplication and squared things up. Tagged the paths and area private.
Tomas Straupis (2021-01-20 16:26:16+00:00): Reverted. Classification was fine. Smaller one is a railway station (according to LT classification), therefore -> town+rank=20, smaller one is a village.
gutmapping (2021-01-20 16:43:58+00:00): Classification maybe is fine, but simple map-user case - browsing on map you see bigger label for smaller village. Misleading.
Tomas Straupis (2021-01-21 07:56:37+00:00): I agree - bad visual hierarchy. Comes from old times when railway stations were important. Will look at fixing it in our maps (*.openmap.lt) - https://github.com/openmaplt/vector-map/issues/360

Thank you for noticing!
mahdi1234 (2021-01-20 15:58:31+00:00): Ahoj,

vitej na OSM, tag "name" prosim pouzivej, pokud ma danej objekt naky oficialni jmeno, popis, co se tam nachazi neni spravne viz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Key:name pro automat muzes pouzit https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dvending_machine konkretne https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:vending%3Dpublic_transport_tickets stejne tak WC lze https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cs:Tag:amenity%3Dtoilets s priznaky pristupu a podobne.

mahdi