piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
tographer (2015-12-08 16:48:56+00:00): Hi Colin,

Thanks again for your replies. I will read your wiki page on UK Boundary tagging carefully.

One of the issues that I had been trying to fix (with my clumsy changes) is that Royal Leamington Spa seems to show as a suburb of Warwick (http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=2610791209), also that when you go to this page for Royal Leamington Spa it shows as the address being part of Warwick (second line under 'Address') where Warwick is shown as a town, but then when you click on the hyperlink for relation 176448 on this line it shows you the boundary we've just been discussing for Warwickshire. 

I don't know to what extent it is a peculiarity to Warwick, Warwick District, Warwickshire, Leamington etc, but it does all feel a bit broken.

Any ideas?

Many thanks in advance,

Paul.
Colin Smale (2015-12-08 17:06:52+00:00): Hallo Paul,
I will look into this, it looks wrong.
Can I suggest we continue through the wiki email system, and not in this changeset discussion? It is a bit unwieldy and it is not really intended for this. You can contact me on this page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:EmailUser/Csmale

I think you will need a wiki account if you don't already have one.

Thanks!
Colin
luschi (2015-08-21 15:30:43+00:00): ganz "richtig" sind sie noch nicht, da man_made=bridge eine verbindung zum Flussbett hat, was hier genauso falsch ist wie bei bridge=yes
dieterdreist (2015-09-01 19:02:09+00:00): well done
marchelloUA (2015-08-21 16:16:52+00:00): це може бути також Управління Екології
maraf24 (2015-08-25 22:55:01+00:00): Ale ten autoserwis jest na pewno w tym budynku, więc dlaczego ikonka jest przed?
I czy mógłbyś nie dopisywać POI do istniejących węzłów z adresem? Potem jak POI się zamknie to ktoś usunie cały węzeł i w ten sposób zniknie też adres.
kreuzschnabel (2017-05-17 11:29:10+00:00): You placed junction nodes on the ramps and named them according to direction. This is good purpose but unusual mapping. 

- Junction nodes appear on highway exits at the very node where the exiting way splits off. 
- Junction nodes bear the junctions name, not the direction signed. 
- Destinations are tagged to the ways splitting, using the destination=* and destination:ref=* keys. So navigation aids can display the signed destination they mean their driver to go.
I altered these two accordingly. Keep up the good work :-)
Minh Nguyen (2015-08-23 16:45:25+00:00): Thanks for adding this information – I had no idea it used to be a landfill. I changed some of the tags on this POI to be consistent w/ how historic features are often tagged. In iD, you can see them under “All tags” in the sidebar. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Nick D'Amato (2015-08-24 13:14:08+00:00): You're welcome.  I actually have a map of the extent of the landfill, if you think there is  good way to represent that.
kreuzschnabel (2018-07-30 08:42:04+00:00): I know it’s been some time since you did this but "A1 – THE NORTH" is not the actual name of this junction but the signposted destination which should be tagged as 
 
 destination=THE NORTH
 destination:ref=A1
 
This enables routing software to give accurate turn-by-turn directions based on signage (e.g. "turn onto A1 road towards THE NORTH"). So, could you consider to re-edit this and similar ones?
kreuzschnabel (2018-07-30 08:44:44+00:00): I forgot to mention the destination tagging has to be attached to the way leading there (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/148927689), not the junction node.
GerdP (2015-10-26 14:13:49+00:00): please review way 366845287:
what is meant with highway=truck ?
A part of the way looks like a highway=path
AjBelnuovo (2015-10-27 15:23:27+00:00): Não entendi a sua dúvida .
A via é uma rua , que se une a outra via que é uma avenida . E nenhuma das duas é uma via expressa ou auto-estrada .
GerdP (2015-10-27 16:08:47+00:00): The problem: highway=truck is rarely used. 
It looks like highway=track, but the road is not a track, In fact I don't see a road in Bing.
I am talking about this way;
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366845287
GerdP (2015-10-29 09:52:18+00:00): no idea? I've changed highway=truck to a comment, see https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34944923
SomeoneElse (2015-11-15 13:24:25+00:00): I don't believe that e.g. "A52 (W) - Nottingham, Bingham;A52 (E)- Grantham;Boston (Skegness & East Coast)" is the name of the junction here, is it?  It's just a description of where you can get to.  See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only (for what names are designed for) and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dmotorway_junction#Destination_of_the_exit (for how you might want to store this sort of thing).
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this - just trying to help.  Any questions, please don't hesitate to ask.
Cheers,
Andy
SomeoneElse (2015-09-14 14:58:41+00:00): Hi - just spotted http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/366850501 here (a way without tags).
kreuzschnabel (2015-09-14 18:54:21+00:00): Thanks, that was supposed to be a footway (and to be connected to the GNR as well). Done.
aceman444 (2015-08-21 20:44:34+00:00): Dobry den, prosim opravte opening_hours na spravny format podla http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours . T.j. napr. Mo,We 09:00-15:00; Fr 09:00-12:00 . Dakujem.
SomeoneElse (2017-11-12 18:22:39+00:00): The signage I've seen is at the north of the rec ground that has the football goals on it.  The cricket ground just has signage for "Farnsfield Cricket Club".  
If you know someone that has better information then please update it - someone who lives there is far more likely to know than someone (me) just reading the signs on the gates!
ViriatoLusitano (2015-08-23 01:01:58+00:00): Bom trabalho!
naoliv (2015-08-24 11:59:14+00:00): Valeu!
AkageMuk (2015-08-24 07:46:55+00:00): Sveiki, Raptorfen! Vai "Grigorija autostāvvieta" ir oficialais autostāvvietas nosaukums, vai tikai vietējo iesauka?
Raptorfen (2015-08-24 08:08:21+00:00): Sveiks! Oficiālais nosaukums nav zināms, "Grigorija autostāvvieta" ir neoficiālais nosaukums, kurš tiek lietots ikdienā.
Sunfishtommy (2015-08-25 05:02:47+00:00): Deleted Village names in Guatemala.
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-02-09 13:25:34+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contributions here. :) Just one minor point, I notice that several of you were editing at the same time, and 3 of you have been editing at the same place, and yous each have put the same building at the same time. Maybe in future don't edit the same area at exactly the same time as other mappers? If you're using a tasking manager then that should take care of that.

Here's the 3 changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33494939
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33494627
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33494507
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-02-09 13:25:32+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contributions here. :) Just one minor point, I notice that several of you were editing at the same time, and 3 of you have been editing at the same place, and yous each have put the same building at the same time. Maybe in future don't edit the same area at exactly the same time as other mappers? If you're using a tasking manager then that should take care of that.

Here's the 3 changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33494939
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33494627
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33494507
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2017-02-09 13:25:28+00:00): Hi! Welcome to OSM! Thanks for your contributions here. :) Just one minor point, I notice that several of you were editing at the same time, and 3 of you have been editing at the same place, and yous each have put the same building at the same time. Maybe in future don't edit the same area at exactly the same time as other mappers? If you're using a tasking manager then that should take care of that.

Here's the 3 changesets:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33494939
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33494627
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33494507
Tchiller (2016-07-08 10:42:35+00:00): Mir ist nicht klar, was in der Scheuchzerstrasse gemeint ist. Ist das eine Einbahnstrasse oder nicht? Falls nicht, dann muss das ja nicht für Velos explizit genannt werden und dann wäre das cycleway=opposite_lane auch falsch, oder?
SomeoneElse (2015-09-09 00:03:03+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!

I think that some nodes might have got dragged by accident here - if you look at https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.07066/-3.80664 you can see that the forest track seems to zig-zag back on itself as it joins the public footpath.  Presumably it doesn't do that in real life?

Cheers,

Andy
SomeoneElse (2015-09-20 10:04:14+00:00): I've fixed the "doubling back" issue in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34136902 (based on the underlying GPS traces).  Does that look OK now?
emacsen (2015-08-23 11:01:00+00:00): This is clearly an import. Did you go through the required Import Guidelines? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
5m4u9 (2015-08-30 05:06:23+00:00): genial añadir la red mesh!

Mejoré algunas cosas que parece mal:

* separar donde está el r00thouse de la puerta
* añadir etiqueta fixme para arreglar características nodo mesh. ver ejemplo http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1695867747
* restaurar la vista panorámica de laicacota
MichaelVL (2015-08-22 04:38:52+00:00): Hej,
Det ser ud til, at du har sammenlagt addresse 4 og 12 på Gurrevej (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/340680473/history) - er det korrekt eller en fejl?  Umiddelbart ser det ikke korrekt ud...
Sulfo (2015-08-22 08:16:35+00:00): Det her du helt ret i Michael. Det helt klart en fejl fra min side.
Hvad er den bedste måde at rette op på det? Manuelt eller kan et rollback laves på det enkelte punkt. Hvis en form for rollback kan laves, ved jeg ikke hvordan det gøres. Jeg retter det gerne manuelt hvis det eneste mulighed. Jeg skal bare havde det bekræftet af dig.
Hjart (2015-08-22 09:52:49+00:00): Der er mulighed for at revertere med JOSM (bør dog kun bruges af erfarne folk). Jeg har brugt det mange gange, men kun med hele rettesæt. Det ser ud til man kan revertere enkelte objekter også, men jeg har endnu ikke gennemskuet hvordan.
Ellers er der måske mulighed for at få https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/AWSbot til at komme forbi (hvis den da stadig er aktiv)
Harald Hartmann (2016-12-06 14:50:32+00:00): shouldn't it be generator:source (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:generator:source) instead of power:source? Also generator:method instead of power:method?
horstsun (2016-12-07 09:20:03+00:00): you're right, it was my first try with a power plant - i changed it already
erickdeoliveiraleal (2017-12-02 22:02:34+00:00): Não se deve colar áreas com vias como se fez aqui.
AMDmi3 (2016-02-08 21:31:12+00:00): Вы удалили статусные части у улиц ("улица Ленина" → "Ленина"). Не надо так делать, пожалуйста.
GOwin (2015-08-24 10:54:32+00:00): Don't put any personal information online.
GOwin (2015-08-26 01:21:11+00:00): re operator tag. This shouldn't refer to the head of the barangay, but to the entity that operates it (i.e. "Barangay Domolog Council"), and used together with another tag: operator:type=government

For more information, see : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:operator
aaronsta (2015-08-22 10:45:23+00:00): Hi epicsauce :)
There appears to be a link at
http://gatewaywa.com.au/assets/Publications/Factsheets/FACTSHEET-4-Tonkin-Dunreath.pdf
In the visualisation it appears to be covered by a red material. In aerial photographs this appears to be under construction. But it probably wouldn't be used by regular traffic, after construction it may be mapped as a service road or something similar. Good find :)
SomeoneElse (2015-09-26 16:01:02+00:00): I think that something's gone a bit wrong with the tagging of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/120317629/history . Currently it has "yes=no".  I'm guessing that perhaps that should be "oneway=no" or some other access mode = "no"?
ratrun (2015-09-27 14:04:47+00:00): Thans for informing me. I fixed it. It would be interesting to 
know how that happended, because I'm 100% sure that I didn't tag this 
intentionally. I tried to figure out what could have happend using JOSM, 
but I couldn't. I know that it must be related with the JOSM feature 
that you only need to type the first letter, and with its automatic 
expanding. You can get so fastwith this so that you don`t recognise such 
errors. Anyhow, I don't want to miss that JOSM feature because the risk 
of such mistaces is worth the speed you gain.
literan (2015-08-22 10:19:33+00:00): Названия ставятся без кавычек!
Dilon Pait (2015-08-22 14:52:27+00:00): Приветствую. Спасибо за комментарии. Я еще где то мог так написать, более не буду.
santamariense (2015-08-22 10:08:24+00:00): Parabéns pelo trabalho realizado. OSM saindo na frente novamente.
portalaventura (2015-08-25 04:46:18+00:00): Eu agradeço. Ainda carece de ajuste a localização de em alguns pontos. Os que precisam estão com a tag fixme. Qualquer ajuste é bem vindo. Ainda quero adicionar os prefixos dos taxistas que operam em cada ponto de taxi, a cor padrão e a forma de pagamento. Tem tb a questao dos taxis adaptados que não está bem tagueada. Vou levar essas questões para serem discutidas no fórum.
emergency99 (2015-08-23 16:24:45+00:00): Bitte beim Bearbeiten von Buslinien darauf achten, dass die Stationen und Straßenzüge in der richtigen Reihenfolge in der Relation sind. Ist bei Josm ja leicht zu überprüfen. 
Danke...
Habe den 50A wieder in Ordnung gebracht.
Vincent de Phily (2015-08-26 13:24:55+00:00): According to my memory and http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/zDcF2czkoXHqbJStZ72Ejg/photo (which I took in April), you can go straight on here. That no_straight_through restriction also doesn't make sense from a traffic flow POV.

Can you point at your source ? Otherwise I'll remove that restriction. Please include detailed comments and source in your future changesets.
Vincent de Phily (2015-08-28 16:40:38+00:00): Reverted along with http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33646862
Conor2000 (2017-06-12 18:49:47+00:00): I'm sorry for this edit. I genuinely believed that you couldn't go straight on. I was clearly misremembering things. I hope that we can forget this incident.
jlcod (2015-08-22 19:06:17+00:00): Hallo und danke für die neuen Einträge am Hardtsee! 
Nur zwei kleine Anmerkungen dazu, name=* sollte nicht für Beschreibungen verwendet werden, nur für "echte" Namen (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Names#name_ist_nur_der_Name). Die Beschreibung ist z.B. durch sports=table_tennis schon gegeben. (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:sport)
Für den Steg fände ich https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:man_made%3Dpier passender, marina würde eher einen jachthafen beschreiben. 
Danke und Grüße!
S1804 (2015-08-23 19:59:32+00:00): Oh, danke für den Tipp! Ich werde das mit den Namen ändern.
Jup, mit dem Steg war ich auch noch nicht ganz zufrieden. Ich arbeite das noch nach...
Hjart (2015-08-22 10:14:30+00:00): Måske det kunne være en ide at fjerne note=* og construction=yes
AE35 (2015-08-22 10:38:51+00:00): Er gjort for 40 minutter side da Borgmesteren klippede snoren
Hjart (2015-08-22 11:31:47+00:00): construction=yes er der stadig
Hjart (2015-08-22 11:33:29+00:00): Hvor kommer de der wikidata=* iøvrigt fra?
Alecs01 (2015-08-22 11:34:43+00:00): Ciao, benvenuto in OpenStreetMap! 
volevo solo farti notare che per convenzione in OSM si usa scrivere Via, Piazza ecc.. con l'iniziale maiuscola, e per le vie intitolate a persone, si usa il nome intero (nome + cognome) se noto, come è indicato qui: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Nomi_delle_strade
Buon mapping!
Luigi Re Cecconi (2015-08-22 19:48:09+00:00): Grazie. Mi è sfuggito. Nei prossimi giorni provvedo a sistemare quanto ho inserito in modo etrrato per uniformarlo alle regole di OSM. Ciao. E se ti accorgi che ho sbagliato qualcos'altro non esitare ad avvisarmi.
rab (2015-10-08 16:51:46+00:00): Abbiegespuren werden nicht als separate Wege gemapt
GOwin (2015-08-22 12:57:48+00:00): Sir, sa dagat ba talaga itong beach house? :)
bigbug21 (2015-08-25 19:50:27+00:00): Danke für diese und weitere Überarbeitungen. Da macht das Detaillierten vor Ort gleich doppelt Spaß!
Hjart (2015-08-22 17:48:31+00:00): Hvilke retningslinier?
Sulfo (2015-08-22 20:02:50+00:00): [...] etc. plus the open space in between them and the shrubbery/trees around them.

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland
kayle (2015-08-24 06:05:59+00:00): Ahoj, vitaj v OSM. Len jedna drobná poznámka k tejto úprave. Otváracie hodiny sa zapisujú v "špeciálnom" formáte v angličtine, aby to bolo jednotné a dalo sa to strojovo spracovávať. Viac http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening_hours
Tu som to už opravil.
waldhans (2015-08-23 18:01:02+00:00): any reason for the change on way 173409683? greenhouse horticulture was never accepted for building, only for landuse.

Would be nice if you change it back, it's part of a standard upload in our area.
jc67 (2015-08-27 21:54:27+00:00): sure. sorry for the inconvenience. a mistake.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-24 17:30:54+00:00): Are you sure that http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241361362#map=18/56.10427/-3.93210 is really "natural=heath"?  A small area of heathland next to a housing estate in Stiring seems quite unlikely.  A patch of heather, however, seems very possible.
jc67 (2015-08-29 10:11:25+00:00): ok. I think I understand that we have a different point of view. my mindset is that "heath" is "heath" whatever surface is covered and using 1 value is better than 2 especially when the difference is only the covered surface. 
For me this is of the same level than having for exemple natural=small_wood and natural=big_wood for another surface; Both are only wood...
but ok I agree that my view could be not shared - probably some sort of "professional deformation" on my side - I'm in IT ;-).
SomeoneElse (2015-09-05 00:26:25+00:00): The mental picture I have of "heath" is similar to the canonical wikipedia example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Heath.jpg .  It's got heather growing on it, but there's more to it than that.  "Heather" on the other hand is just a small plant - an area with heather growing on it isn't necessarily a heath.  The Scottish one http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/241361362#map=18/56.10427/-3.93210 could quite possibly be "heather", but not "heath" - perhaps ask the original mapper or add a note to try and find out?

http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/247100046 is in many ways even odder - it's in a tropical part of South America, so "heather" seems fairly unlikely; maybe it was actually a typo and the original mapper meant something else altogether?
jc67 (2015-09-05 11:26:21+00:00): 241361362 : ok, for me it's quite clearly visible on BingSat that it's not a "Heather only" area... However, I just sent a mail to the author/Creator for his input.
jc67 (2015-09-05 11:43:11+00:00): 247100046 : msg sent to author "schandlers" for his input.
Nakaner (2015-09-06 20:59:16+00:00): Haben die beiden Blöcke des KKP getrennte Werksfeuerwehren? Derzeit sind in OSM zwei Feuerwehrmagazine dort  erfasst.
SomeoneElse (2015-08-24 17:37:20+00:00): You have changed http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322964225 from "natural=bushes" to "natural=scrub".  "scrub" is not a synonym for "bushes".  The item in question here is a hedge; and a hedge made out of "scrub" makes no sense whatsoever.  You appear to be performing a series of mechanical edits without in any way engaging your brain.  Please don't do this - it makes the quality of the data collected in OpenStreetMap much poorer.  Mechanical edits by people who have never been to a particular location and don't give a thought to the changes that they are making devalue the contributions of people who actually do go out and collect data.
SomeoneElse (2015-09-16 12:25:52+00:00): Although you've changed http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322964225 back you clearly haven't checked everything - http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322964224 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/322964223 are similar.  Also http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97953082 from the imagery looks more like a hedge; I'd suggest contacting the previous mapper or adding a note.  One of the Malaysian ones (previously source=bing) looks more like woodland than either scrub or bushes.  Again, a note would be better.
seav (2015-08-23 01:54:25+00:00): One of the turn restrictions that was added will end up being a no-left-turn from Daang Hari eastbound to Molino Road northbound. Is this correct?
seav (2015-08-27 16:41:57+00:00): I have fixed the turn restriction such that it is now a no-u-turn instead of a no-left-turn: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33625607
chillly (2015-08-22 14:49:35+00:00): Great to see your edits. In this case the thing you have added a name to is the landuse. I would have added a building (traced from the aerial images) then add the name and add a tag for a shop hardware (our international description of an ironmonger).  If you need help, please ask.
Polarbear (2015-10-31 18:17:11+00:00): Hallo retnug, statt "difficulty" solltest du besser "climbing:grade:saxon:min=*" verwenden, das ist eindeutig und auf https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport%3Dclimbing#Grading dokumentiert
patzi (2015-08-24 09:40:54+00:00): Ich verstehe diese Änderung nicht, sie deckt sich nicht mit dem Empfehlungen des Wikis https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attributierung_von_Stra%C3%9Fen_in_Deutschland#Getrennte_Linien und nur weil es in Mapnik nicht schön aussieht macht es das Mapping nicht besser. Auch wird es so nicht einfacher zu warten.
jengelh (2015-08-24 09:53:45+00:00): Och mönno. Die Diskussion hatten wir doch schon - http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=27571&p=17 die letztendlich wie immer ohne Ergebnis verlaufen ist.

Und doch: es ist einfacher zu warten, weil jetzt pro Way weniger Relation liegen, und weil man ohnehin weniger restriction-Relation benötigt.

Aufs Verrecken auf bauliche Trennung zu setzen ist einfach total unsinnig. http://inai.de/2015/08/20
patzi (2015-08-24 09:59:16+00:00): Ich habe deinen Blogbeitrag schon bei den bugs die neulich aufkamen gesehen. Das doofe ist, dass man den nicht kommentieren konnte. Meiner Meinung nach und so interpretiere ich auch das Wiki, ist die Ein-Weg-Variante auch vorzuziehen. Und das "Och mönno. Die Diskussion hatten wir doch schon.." hatte ich mir auch gedacht. Ich dachte wir hätten uns da auch im Anschluss so in Konsens befunden das hier als Ein-Weg zu lassen und die Bürgestr. als zwei, aber dem war wohl nicht so.
Ein Ergebnis der Diskussion gibt es ja eigentlich und das steht im Wiki. Ich habe jetzt einfach mal im Forum explizit nach der Ein-/Zwei -Spur-Variante gefragt um eine Meinungsblid von anderen zu erhalten. http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=32443
jengelh (2015-08-24 10:10:45+00:00): Hab halt keine Kommentarsoftware.

Wo bitte läge der Sinn, die Bürgerstr. als Doppellinie und An der Lutter als mal-Doppellinie-mal-nicht auszuführen. Der einzige Grund warum AdL bisher nicht wieder als Doppel (nach vermutlich cset 27466196) ausgeführt war, war Faulheit, das wieder zurückzusetzen.
Hjart (2015-08-22 18:26:05+00:00): I've transferred the tags to a polygon and added a website
Luca Moiana (2017-02-22 09:21:14+00:00): Ciao, PJ, il nodo 371144325 (guado) non dovrebbe essere spostato sul corso d'acqua?
seav (2015-08-23 01:51:00+00:00): SLEX is already marked as int_ref=AH26 (international ref is Asian Highway 26). ref=* should be reserved for the national reference numbers provided by DPWH.
seav (2015-08-27 16:38:59+00:00): I have removed "AH26" from the ref=* tag: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33625554
seav (2015-08-23 01:52:00+00:00): Is your intention to expand the territory of San Pedro? If so, did you also intend to expand the territory of Muntinlupa?
seav (2015-08-27 16:34:10+00:00): I have modified Muntinlupa's boundary to the previous shape: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33625476