piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:31:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435900 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44034610 because there was a problem with licence of data use
Reclus (2016-11-29 21:16:30+00:00): Hallo!

Da JOSM wohl den Key ref:mts-k anmeckert habe ich in den von mir gemachten OSM-Einträgen und [auf meiner Wiki-Seite](https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Reclus#Markttransparenzstelle_f.C3.BCr_Kraftstoffe) ref:mts-k durch ref:mtsk ersetzt. Würdest du das in deinen Einträgen auch so nachvollziehen?
glglgl (2016-11-30 08:35:44+00:00): Habe ich gerade getan, danke.
Reclus (2016-11-30 11:00:25+00:00): Super! Danke!
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 01:40:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
rmikke (2017-05-23 14:04:50+00:00): Hej,
mam prośbę. 
Zainstaluj sobie wikipedia plugin do JOSM-a, jeśli jeszcze nie masz, i przed wysłaniem zmian:
1. Zaznacz wszystko
2. Wybierz z menu Dane -> Pobierz Wikidata ID

Próbuję uporządkować linki do Wikipedii i bardzo ładnie mi je wykrywa wyszukiwanie obiektów, które mają wikipedia=*, a nie mają wikidata=*. I kiedy nawrzucasz trochę obiektów z linkiem do wikipedii, a bez wikidata ID, to mi wyłażą i zaciemniają obraz. Ja to co jakiś czas poprawiam (i.e. wyszukuję JOSM-em takie obiekty i używam na nich tej samej opcji - gdzie link do wikipedii jest OK, dociąga się automatycznie), ale mogę to robić tylko wieczorami, bo tu nie mam JOSM-a. A mam czas posprawdzać trochę obiektów, wymagających ręcznej interwencji i tu mi przeszkadzają fałszywe alarmy. A akurat Ty sporo rzeczy dodajesz, więc i sporo tych fałszywych alarmów generujesz.

W tej chwili mam tak:

http://r.blabler.pl/l/2qnl

i to czerwone w podlaskiem, to chyba wszystko obiekty, które edytowałeś. Poza operą, której brakuje wikidata ID.
Władysław Komorek (2017-05-23 19:45:00+00:00): Robię to od dawna dla miejscowości i granic wsi. Chyba, że przeoczę.
Obecnie dodaję kościoły i ich linki do wikipedii jeśli istnieją, ale rzadko który ma wikidata.
rmikke (2017-05-23 20:54:05+00:00): Właśnie stwierdziłem coś dziwnego z tymi kościołami. Większość wikidata ma, dla części nie działa ściąganie JOSM-em, ani automat w iD - tym spokojnie wklejam identyfikator z Wikidata. Natomiast większość z tych, które dodałeś ostatnio bez problemu wzięła wartość wikidata=* z plugina.

Czyli warto jednak to klepać i dla kościołów.
Władysław Komorek (2017-05-23 22:11:52+00:00): Nie należy jednak mylić wikidata dla parafii z wikidata dla kościoła.
Zawsze powinno być dla obiektu kościoła/cerkwi.
Wikdata parafii są tylko dla granic parafii na OSM (na razie w diecezji radomskiej i archidiecezji krakowskiej).
rmikke (2017-05-23 23:35:46+00:00): Słusznie, ale wtedy nie ma również artykułu w wikipedii o kościele i nie należy zamiast tego linkować artykułu o parafii. Ani wpisywać nazwy kościoła jako tytułu artykułu w Wikipedii, skoro takiego artykułu nie ma.
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:49+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mueschel (2016-12-02 11:47:56+00:00): Hi,
could you check the tagging of the restaurants you edited? The values of the tags (e.g. diet, cuisine, opening_hours) must be in English and follow the common tagging schemes (e.g. opening_hours as a fixed syntax that is understood by software).

Jan
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
highflyer74 (2016-12-05 15:09:20+00:00): Hello!

Please make sure to use the OSM Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) as a reference when adding data. Otherwise the data is completely unusable.

Thank you!
---------------------------------------
Salut!

Assurez-vous d'utiliser le Wiki OSM (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page) comme référence lors de l'ajout de données. Sinon, les données sont complètement inutilisables.

Je vous remercie!
fredi_alf (2016-12-16 00:07:44+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435566 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44035340 because there was a problem with licence of data use
mavl (2017-10-21 09:43:19+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
GinaroZ (2016-12-06 17:28:56+00:00): Hi thanks for adding this path map.

I'm assuming there a bridge over Breich Water on the path?
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
sjreynolds143 (2017-05-08 08:49:50+00:00): Hi Neil,

While I have no reason to doubt what you have done, how is it that you have used Bing and Mapbox to realign the roads on this estate? I can't find any imagery from either of those sources that shows the estate. Thanks.
Neil Twist (2017-05-08 12:14:28+00:00): Hi,

I live very close to this estate (Wolseley Close), so although I had the maps set to Bing and Mapbox, I was actually using memory and knowledge of the road shapes. I'm happy for the changeset to be rejected if that's not robust enough, though I would appreciate some guidance on the best way forwards if so.

In general, I would say that there are numerous issues with this area, especially since it is not finished yet.

Thanks,

Neil
Neil Twist (2017-05-08 12:15:44+00:00): Additionally, I updated some of the road types as they were set incorrectly.
sjreynolds143 (2017-05-08 13:29:11+00:00): Hi Neil,
Thanks. My reason for asking was to confirm the change from what was in OSM compared to what you had entered - as I said, it wasn't that I doubted you, it's just that I couldn't confirm the sources you said you had used in the changeset. I agree (by looking at Google, which is the only place that has them) that your road shape for Poppyfields Way is much more aligned to what they have. I certainly have no wish to revert the changeset.

As to your "how to" question, working off estate plans, etc, or from memory/local knowledge is fine to get something in, but the only way to get the definitive road geometry is to go out with a GPS device and travel it.

Regards,
Stuart
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
Supaplex (2016-12-01 17:52:21+00:00): 恭喜您完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
woodpeck_repair (2016-12-20 01:40:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44529328 where the changeset comment is: revert accidental upload of 'lanelet' data to OSM which is meant to be uploaded to a private server only. See http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44184590 for discussion.
mavl (2017-10-21 09:42:30+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 53122460 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted (an incompatible source) [http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44028420].
amapanda ᚛ᚐᚋᚐᚅᚇᚐ᚜ 🏳️‍⚧️ (2019-07-15 14:05:14+00:00): Hi, you edited a really long fence ( 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456598779 ) that looks very strange to me, i can't see anything in the Bing aerial and the frence as mapped goes in a dead straight line.

Are you sure that's correct?
BáthoryPéter (2016-11-29 15:06:40+00:00): A hivatalos menetrend szerint "Állatifehérje feldolgozó" a megálló neve:
http://www.dakk.hu/images/menetrend/5160.pdf

Miért változtattad meg?
user_242798 (2016-12-13 20:53:42+00:00): If you add a shop (like here "Trekpleister") add new keys to the already existing BAG node:
- name=Trekpleister
- operator=Trekpleister
- shop=health
As a result we won't see duplicated 
- addr:housenumber=24
on the map.
So do not duplicate BAG node (having address information).
Osmose (http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/?) will show an Error:
Number twice in the street
Multiple numbers "24" in way "Rijnstraat" 
I did not correct the error, so you can verify by yourself.
Thanks in advance!
borishag (2016-12-14 07:52:44+00:00): Made the changes as suggested. Thx.
user_242798 (2016-12-14 11:10:47+00:00): Great! Verified! Thx!
Hjart (2016-11-29 16:04:17+00:00): Bemærk venligst at veje i sig selv ikke har postnumre
eggie (2019-03-27 15:46:03+00:00): Nooit een welkomstmail ontvangen zie ik... bij deze alsnog.. Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:41:10+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435529 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44036397 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:37:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435523 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44036439 because there was a problem with licence of data use
fredi_alf (2016-12-15 23:37:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 44435484 where the changeset comment is: reverted 44036537 because there was a problem with licence of data use
Maskulinum (2016-11-29 20:31:29+00:00): Hallo Thoric67, in diesem Änderungssatz hast du einem Haus einen Namen gegeben. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/124534871
Hast du dies vor Ort überprüft oder einfach nur aus einem Note übernommen?
Ich gehe davon aus, dass dieses Gebäude nicht den Eigennamen "Eich" trägt wie z.B. das Haus Gentil oder die Villa Desch.
Und nur als Hinweis:
Desweiteren wurde im Änderungssatz als Hintergrund Bing angegeben. In iD können auch die Bayernatlasbilder verwendet werden. Diese sind Aktueller und Lagegenauer als die Bingbilder (leider auch ein wenig unschärfer) siehe auch: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=56454
Viele Grüße Maskulinum
Thoric67 (2016-11-30 17:16:31+00:00): Die Änderung habe ich per Telefonbuch und Gelbe Seite abgeglichen, an der entsprechenden Adresse wohnt eine Familie Reich. Von der stammt vermutlich auch der Kommentar mit dem Namen. Das hab ich allerdings nicht überprüft.

Wenn der Name der Bewohner da nichts verloren hat, kannst du ihn gerne tilgen.

Das mit dem Bayernatlas Hinterleger muss ich mir mal ansehen, bisher habe ich die Positionierung von Häusern über Bing vorgenommen.
Wright One (2016-12-01 12:16:26+00:00): 吐露港公路擴闊工程及龍山隧道工程正在進行，期間會將大窩西支路重新定線

見: http://toloc3.com.hk
vasinlo26 (2016-12-01 18:40:30+00:00): 多謝你提醒, 前日加入分支線路時, 發現此支路偏移, 修正後才能順利完成, 因我看Bing實景圖作對比, 不知道是否高架橋樑, 拜託請你幫忙修正, 抱歉抱歉.
skyper (2016-12-01 13:52:43+00:00): Das ist und bleibt ein Gebäude. Warum hast Du building=* entfernt ?
MarkusHD (2017-02-13 11:37:15+00:00): Dieser und der vorangegangene changeset 44003886 wurden gerade rückgängig gemacht.
literan (2018-11-15 08:24:52+00:00): Приветствую! Там https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4528639044#map=19/55.76265/37.58111 действительно решетка на дороге, препятствующая проходу скота? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Tag:barrier=cattle%20grid?uselang=ru
catdreamer (2019-02-13 08:48:09+00:00): 請問這條是甚麼路?純好奇...
dan980 (2016-11-29 17:26:25+00:00): Ciao! Cos'è Padrogiano? Il nome del gruppo di case? Sarebbe meglio aggiungere place=hamlet, oppure, se il posto è disabitato, place=locality
indigomc (2016-11-29 17:18:05+00:00): What are these changes please? If  you are experimenting, this is a live map, and it is not an accepted activity. Please the things you have added.
indigomc (2016-11-29 17:09:47+00:00): I assume your edits are experiments. Please delete them as soon as you are done, otherwise the map is being cluttered by it.
indigomc (2016-11-29 17:04:29+00:00): Hi Leelavathi mareddy 

What is the point of this edit please? You seem to have changed a park into a place of worship. This is a live map. Also please give a meaningful comment, not 'abc'.
indigomc (2016-11-29 17:08:04+00:00): And this one?
Mateusz Konieczny (2021-02-10 15:32:04+00:00): Zerkniesz na https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2533249 ?
indigomc (2016-11-29 17:14:11+00:00): Hi Mounika Gunda

Can you please explain what this is thaht you have added to  the map here?
smaprs (2016-12-04 22:34:39+00:00): Salut, si vous ne parlez pas anglais, je peux essayer un peu français, au fin, si vous préférez.  
  
- - -  
  
Please, you've removed the tag type=multipolygon. So now there's nomore wetland were it was.   
Also you've deleted some ways, so now this relation is broken. You can see it here:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5407489  
and here:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5407490  
I'll have to try to fix it.  
Please, if it's necessary to change some geometries of limits, just change it, without deleting lines of limits, because it may broke relations, as it happened here.  
  
- - -  
  
Ne supprimez pas les lignes (seulement les modifier si necessaire). Il peut casser les relations du lac, comme il a produit.
smaprs (2016-12-04 22:37:39+00:00): Also here it's broken:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/5407485
smaprs (2016-12-04 22:54:20+00:00): C'est que les lignes qui traversent le lac directement, font partie de la relation des multipolygones.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2018-11-24 13:04:32+00:00): Gustavo, essa linha https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456633979/history é de energia mesmo?
streinger (2016-11-30 12:01:43+00:00): подъезд к карьеру, к заводу это tertiary?
чем еще удивите?
streinger (2016-11-30 14:23:08+00:00): а почему собственно не primary?))) буква же Н в идентификаторе, значит тоже региональное или межмуниципальное значение, давайте переделывайте, как-то вы этот момент упустили))))))

вот же ссылка, там и К и Н, все есть:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Highway_classification
streinger (2016-11-30 14:36:45+00:00): Вы же тут таким глобальным вандализмом(вредительством) занялись, хотя нет, есть и польза, появились идентификаторы 53К......;
теперь непонятно сколько времени займет все ваши правки откатить, т.к. вы сам себе на уме, что хочу, то и делаю, и на изучение wiki наплевать.(я вам даже ссылки дал,а вы продолжаете).
str74 (2016-12-04 06:31:09+00:00): По этому поводу я вам уже написал, что ошибся.
str74 (2016-12-04 06:43:32+00:00): Только не паникуйте. А то я вижу у вас истерика уже началась. Не все здесь как на работе сидят. И нужно немного больше времени на ответ давать.
Hjart (2016-11-29 20:49:25+00:00): Det er både lidt sjovt og lidt angst-provokerende at se folk begynde at henvise til wiki artikler man selv har forfattet for ikke så længe siden :-)
eggie (2018-02-03 17:54:18+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
skyper (2016-11-30 02:06:52+00:00): Vandalismus
skyper (2016-12-01 14:09:06+00:00): Revertiert
catonano (2017-12-28 02:38:59+00:00): Perchè Piazza Cavalieri di Vittorio Veneto ha il tag "shop" ? 

Non è mica un negozzio l'intera piazza ?
trigpoint (2016-11-29 23:36:54+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44047606
RobJN (2016-11-29 19:52:45+00:00): Hi. Welcome to OpenStreetMap. Just to make you aware, we have guidelines for the road status in the UK. Basically if the road sign is green then it is a "trunk" road (not a primary).

As such please don't be surprised if someone reverts these edits.

For more info:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Tagging_Guidelines#UK_roads
trigpoint (2016-11-29 23:36:42+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44047606
A12B (2016-11-30 19:06:34+00:00): The road signs in the north south direction are in fact white. Only East West direction are green and hence I have left as "Trunk". I have checked against other sources e.g Bing Maps and the classification I have used is also reflected there.
trigpoint (2016-11-30 19:42:55+00:00): Please do not copy other maps, they are copyright and we do not have permission to use them. Besides bing and google have their own way of classifying roads, the OSM method for the UK is defined in the wiki.
I am 100% sure that the Leicester ring road, and A50 are still trunk as I was there less than 2 weeks ago.
RobJN (2016-12-01 00:58:54+00:00): Hi both,

Thanks for responding. @trigpoint: I don't think this was a case of copying, just bringing in comparisons to prove that it isn't quite so simple cut.

Also in my rush to send a message, I actually wrote it on the wrong changeset. On this changeset Narborough Road is fine. By convention the roundabout adopts the highest classification of the roads passing through it (so "Trunk)".

The changes I wanted to focus my comment on were those changing the road class on the ringroad north of here (i.e. heading clockwise). There the signs are green.

Best regards,
trigpoint (2016-11-29 23:36:27+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44047606
nammala (2016-11-30 05:41:36+00:00): Hi carlo fornaciari,

May I know the reason of giving the highway names as `via Roma` , `via Mazzini` etc. Is that appropriate.

Regards,
nammala
ConsEbt (2017-01-10 05:28:12+00:00): Great work here Rehan! you beat me to this one...
trigpoint (2016-11-29 23:35:52+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44047606
SomeoneElse (2017-01-09 19:54:33+00:00): Hello,

Your changeset comment says that you used Google as a source in this changeset. We are not allowed to copy from Google (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F for details) so you need to not do this again. 

We (OpenStreetMap's Data Working Group) will go through your changes and will need to remove data that's been added from Google. This may take some time, but please do be aware that features that you have added from Google will disappear.

If you have any questions please email the Data Working Group on data@osmfoundation.org .

Best Regards,

Andy Townsend
SomeoneElse (2017-01-09 19:55:57+00:00): مرحبا،

يقول changeset تعليقك الذي استخدمته جوجل كمصدر في هذا changeset. نحن لا يسمح لنا لنسخ من جوجل (انظر https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F لمزيد من التفاصيل) لذا عليك أن لا تفعل ذلك مرة أخرى.

نحن (مجموعة عمل بيانات خريطة الشارع المفتوح ل) سوف تذهب من خلال التغييرات وسوف تحتاج إلى إزالة البيانات التي تمت إضافتها من جوجل. هذا قد يستغرق بعض الوقت، ولكن من فضلك لا تكون على علم بأن الميزات التي قمت بإضافتها من جوجل سوف تختفي.

إذا كان لديك أي أسئلة يرجى الكتابة الفريق العامل البيانات على data@osmfoundation.org.

تحياتي الحارة،

اندي تاونسند
SomeoneElse (2017-01-09 19:56:25+00:00): Bonjour,

Votre commentaire sur le jeu de modifications indique que vous avez utilisé Google comme source dans ce jeu de modifications. Nous ne sommes pas autorisés à copier de Google (voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FAQ#What_images_and_maps_may_I_use_to_make_maps_from.3F pour plus de détails), vous devez donc ne pas le faire à nouveau.

Nous (groupe de travail de données OpenStreetMap) passerons par vos changements et devrons supprimer des données qui ont été ajoutées de Google. Cela peut prendre un certain temps, mais sachez que les fonctionnalités que vous avez ajoutées de Google disparaîtront.

Si vous avez des questions, veuillez envoyer un courrier électronique au groupe de travail Data sur data@osmfoundation.org.

Meilleures salutations,

Andy Townsend
Ali_Alg (2017-01-20 10:34:53+00:00): Source utilisé est image free de Google et parcours sur terrain
Stereo (2017-01-21 14:57:12+00:00): Bonjour,

Les images de Google ne sont malheureusement pas 'free' - elles sont gratuites, mais pas libres. Merci de ne plus les utiliser.
skyper (2016-11-30 02:14:42+00:00): Vandalismus
skyper (2016-12-01 14:08:39+00:00): Revertiert
trigpoint (2016-11-29 23:35:27+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44047606
trigpoint (2016-11-29 23:35:14+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44047606
trigpoint (2016-11-29 23:34:52+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44047606
trigpoint (2016-11-29 23:34:39+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44047606
uvi (2017-02-22 16:03:45+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4268044662
Handelt es sich hierbei um einen richigen Milchautomaten oder nur um eine Verkaufsstelle?
Kommen Waren aus dem Regal, ist m.E. zusätzlich shop=farm mit der description, welche Sachen es dort gibt, korrekt. Sobald ein Automat steht, sollte der doch so auch erscheinen und recherchierbar sein. Einige vertreten auch die Meinung, dass der Punkt mit shop=dairy ergänzt werden sollte. Ich denke, es empfiehlt sich folgendes Beispiel ganz gut: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4264211545 . 
Bei  zwei Automaten, sollte es m.E. auch zwei punkte geben!
Bist du ortskundig, kannst du dies ändern?
Gruß Uwe
Klumbumbus (2017-02-22 18:22:25+00:00): Hallo,
ich habe hier nur das Haupt-tag korrigiert. Der Name sagt, dass es ein Automat ist. Daher amenity=vending_machine anstelle von shop=diary. Ein Automat ist kein Laden.

Ob es ein oder zwei Automaten sind, weiß ich nicht. Habe da keine Ortskenntnis. Falls es zwei Automaten sind, bin ich auch der Meinung, dass es dann zwei nodes geben sollte.

Zu deinem zweiten verlinkten node: sieht gut aus, aber die Adresse gehört da meiner Meinung nicht dran.

VG Stefan
SomeoneElse (2016-11-29 20:02:30+00:00): Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap!
It's great to see people adding stuff around where they live, but please do be careful and only make updates that actually exist on the ground - I'm not convinced about the large swathe of grass at 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/456649469#map=17/52.60762/-1.07770 for example.
If you've made a mistake don't worry - let someone know and we can undo it.
Hope you don't mind me mentioning this, just trying to help - any questions please don't hestitate to ask.
Best Regards,
Andy
trigpoint (2016-11-29 23:34:23+00:00): Reverted in http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/44047606
A12B (2016-11-30 19:01:06+00:00): I can confirm this area of land is grass and can even be seen from the satellite imaginary.