piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
eggie (2020-05-29 09:14:58+00:00): Review.. lastig te beoordelen al die toevoegingen. 
Het wordt nog wat daar. 
Dit waren je edits  https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=85910166
'k Zie dat je die parkeerterreinen hebt verwijderd en dat er parking:lane- dwars parkeren  in de hoofdweg is opgenomen. 
dat lijkt me prima.
MVG,
Eggie
LivingWithDragons (2021-01-31 18:02:46+00:00): This changeset was featured in a video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-j5mYgtSjA
Connecticut (2020-05-29 06:57:43+00:00): bitte eine Gebäude nicht ganz löschen, sondern auf

demolished:building

setzen. Ich wollte es grad laut Luftbild einzeichnen ...
SacStei (2020-05-30 11:48:35+00:00): Der Abriss dieses Wohnblock war im Oktober 2017. Jetzt (30.05.2020) ist dort grüne Wiese.
user_2066394 (2020-05-28 22:35:31+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85910376
ma-rt-in (2020-05-29 06:40:59+00:00): Hallo,
wie genau ist die Beschilderung an Way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/664933476 tatsächlich?
vg
ChrMapper (2020-05-29 09:13:20+00:00): Moin, ehrlich gesagt ist das schon ein paar Wochen her, dass ich da war, aber mit 95%iger Sicherheit das Zeichen 244. Ich werde das aber nächstes mal, wenn ich da bin nochmal prüfen.
ma-rt-in (2020-05-29 09:15:33+00:00): Z244 ? Also eine Fahrradstraße?
Falls ja, dann schau dir mal folgendes Tool an: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/
ChrMapper (2020-05-29 09:20:17+00:00): Ne, https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Zeichen_244_-_Gemeinsamer_Rad-_und_Fu%C3%9Fweg,_StVO_1970.svg
ma-rt-in (2020-05-29 09:22:24+00:00): Ähm, 1970 war das mal Z244, jetzt ist es Z240: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bildtafel_der_Verkehrszeichen_in_der_Bundesrepublik_Deutschland_seit_2017#Vorschriftzeichen_nach_Anlage_2_(zu_%C2%A7_41_Absatz_1_StVO)
Und wenn es so sein sollte, dann bitte so entsprechend den Weg anpassen: http://osmtools.de/traffic_signs/?signs=240
ChrMapper (2020-05-29 09:29:30+00:00): Neumodischer Kram 🙈 Ja, mal gucken.
BCNorwich (2020-05-29 07:24:43+00:00): Hi, Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

I've looked at all your edits and they're pretty good. I did make quite a few tweaks, moved areas off of highway center lines, squared up a few buildings , added pool and play area. also made quite a few amendments to the general area.

Regards Bernard.
camelCaseNick (2020-05-28 23:14:31+00:00): Hey,
why did you remove the links to https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%8A_%D8%BA%D9%8A%D8%B1 and to http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q1649069 and multiple names.
What are your sources? Isn't “Image Mondiales Esri Beta” aerial imagery?
CamelCaseNick
user_2066394 (2020-05-29 11:25:56+00:00): shop=tailor
UKausch (2020-05-29 13:33:37+00:00): Hallo wurzelast,
klar das passt nicht, ich habe es geändert.
Danke & Grüße
Uwe
woodpeck (2020-05-29 09:26:57+00:00): Dear BlueRanger, could you provide a more detailed link to your source "IGAC", especially one that allows us to verify that their data is legal to use for OpenStreetMap?
BlueRanger (2020-05-29 14:46:18+00:00): Hello Woodpeck,
Thank you for reaching out. IGAC has authorized OSM to use their dataset and it is listed here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Colombia
abakus_uploader (2020-05-29 22:31:41+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
dodoelk (2021-02-09 11:04:34+00:00): skąd wziąłeś adres Lepaki Wielkie, Mołdzie, ulica uśmiechu ?????????????
fotirek (2021-02-09 11:12:09+00:00): https://mapa.targeo.pl/usmiechu-ul/moldzie-19-300/ulica
fotirek (2021-02-09 11:21:57+00:00): https://polska.e-mapa.net/
dodoelk (2021-02-09 11:26:55+00:00): bierz dane z e-mapy a nie jakiegoś targeo, zresztą ja w najbliższej przyszłości uzupełnię wszystkie braki w bliższej i dalszej okolicy
fotirek (2021-02-09 11:30:44+00:00): W e-mapach również oznaczona ulica pod Mołdzie. Często jeżdżę tam z klientami, ulica istnieje od dawna. Dzięki za uzupełnianie danych, wiele tu brakuje a maperów brak w naszej okolicy.
Cristoffs (2021-02-09 18:02:16+00:00): a najlepiej z warstwy PRG ....
alan_gr (2023-01-23 08:58:25+00:00): Hola, tengo una duda sobre el nuevo nodo creado en este conjunto de cambios para la Estación Victoria Kent. Es un duplicado del nodo existente, o la intención era representar otro cosa? (Creo que "light_rail" en el nodo más viejo es un error).

Hi, I have a query about the new node for Victoria Kent station created in this changeset. Does it duplicate the already existing node, or was it intended to represent something else? (I think the reference to "light_rail" in the old node is an error).

New: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7567516123
Old: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4060435925
Patrick1977Bln (2023-01-23 14:06:25+00:00): Hola,
Sí, el nudo es doble. Mi nodo puede ser cancelado. Correcto es el nodo 4060435925 con estas tags: railway=halt (porque apeadero), station=light_rail debe ser cancelado.
alan_gr (2023-01-24 10:38:24+00:00): Gracias por confirmar, lo cambiaré en los próximos días.
jaap de vries (2020-10-13 14:18:55+00:00): Je hebt een oplaadpunt toegevoegd. Zijn er 2 oplaad punten, gratis of betaald? Zie ook de tags hiervoor op https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity=charging%20station?uselang=nl
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-13 14:27:26+00:00): Dit is weer een geval van "hier heb ik geen verstand van en het staat ook niet direct aangegeven voor zover ik kan zien, dus ik zet gewoon neer dat het er is en dan ga ik verder." Wat kan ik het beste doen in zulke situaties?
jaap de vries (2020-10-13 14:31:42+00:00): Als je een laad station op de kaart zet even een foto maken van het laadstation en op de pc deze controleren of er 2 laaddokken zijn, hoeveel watt, gratis of betaald of prive op een parkeerplaats Anders gewoon overslaan
jaap de vries (2020-10-13 14:32:56+00:00): Hier een voorbeeld van een laadstation in Ede https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7857152907
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-13 14:36:35+00:00): Ik zie wat je bedoelt. Wat is beter: overslaan of een fixme=*?
jaap de vries (2020-10-13 14:44:22+00:00): Denk dat je deze beter kan verwijderen of alle tags invult, misschien vindt je dat ook wel leuk om te doen als oefening.
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-13 14:49:36+00:00): Dan denk ik dat ik de laadpalen ga controleren voor geschikte tags. Is inderdaad wel een leuke oefening. Wat doe ik met de groenvoorziening die ik liever niet na wil gaan voor alle details?
jaap de vries (2020-10-13 14:58:57+00:00): Zojuist nog een artikel gekregen over laadpalen https://www.mobiliteitsplatform.nl/artikel/duidelijke-informatie-laadpalen-verplicht-in-2021?utm_source=MobiliteitsPlatform&utm_campaign=5bcc00a691-MobiliteitsPlatform06052020_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_27f8e362c0-5bcc00a691-342659833
Friendly_Ghost (2020-10-13 15:15:16+00:00): Ik hoop dat we dan wat imports kunnen doen. Als de info openbaar wordt, lijkt me dat een stuk productiever dan dat we alle individuele laadpalen af moeten gaan.
keithonearth (2020-05-29 01:03:33+00:00): Very amusing, but I think it should be removed. Do I really need to say why?
Eimai (2020-05-31 15:30:51+00:00): Please don't map new tracks that are built as razed
JJJWegdam (2020-05-31 17:05:44+00:00): In this area, tracks are changed relatively often. I always use URBIS 2019 (or in general: the most recent URBIS imagery) in the Brussels area. If this results in errors and you have local knowledge that can fix them, feel free to either let me know which specific tracks are wrong so I can fix them or to correct them yourself
Eimai (2020-05-31 17:24:03+00:00): Yes, the situation is quickly changing, this weekend most of L26A was put out of service for example. But that's why I'd appreciate it if tracks weren't changed if you're not sure about the latest situation on the ground. If something is mapped after the satellite images were taken maybe check it locally first.
Eimai (2020-05-31 17:58:43+00:00): In this case, a new yard is being built just east of the L25N to replace Bundel C, together with the new L26B which is going to replace the L26A when it's ready. It's not finished yet but the tracks that are there are in use already.
abakus_uploader (2020-05-29 22:31:39+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
mrpulley (2025-08-02 09:38:48+00:00): You've put a bus stop at Corroboree Flat, nowhere near any roads. A bus station at the end of a minor road. I've noticed other odd edits on other changesets. At some point I'll go through your changesets and will probably delete most of these weird contributions.
mrpulley (2025-08-13 11:16:22+00:00): Deleted at changeset https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/170383543
user_2066394 (2020-05-30 23:13:24+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85912404
user_6771650 (2020-05-29 01:55:15+00:00): Hi HJUdall,
Please don't add names to roads if they aren't the actual signed name on the road. For example, the numerous roads in the parking lot at Westwood High School should not have a name tag. If you have any questions, let me know.
hsc666 (2020-05-29 13:33:27+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 85949434 where the changeset comment is: Revert Pokemon park.
hsc666 (2020-05-29 13:29:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 85949253 where the changeset comment is: Revert Pokemon park.

Nicht jede Wiese ist ein Park!
Polarbear-repair (2020-06-04 22:19:08+00:00): Could you please explain what "rule and talk" you refer to for the deletions?
user_8334278 (2020-06-05 02:51:44+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dproposed
user_8334278 (2020-06-05 03:29:01+00:00): PS: my friend just moved there and 11 years later the road stops at the apartment complex.
Alan Bragg (2020-06-20 12:31:53+00:00): Don't nuke them yet. I started converting some into routes using highway sections that are found in E911 roads and MapWith AI. Do you know who added all the landuse but not the roads they define.
aweech (2020-06-20 13:18:09+00:00): The touble with snowmobile routes is sometimes they go on the road and sometimes they go off to the side, and I don't have the local knowledge to know what happens. It looks like most of the natural=wood was added by user/Bkissin, who edits mainly in Portland.
Ottonormalverbraucher (2020-05-29 15:49:00+00:00): Hello Wallip, I see that you are using the tag "bridge=culvert". According to the OSM-Wiki (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge#Possible_synonym), "bridge=yes" [etc.] (for railways or highways) or "tunnel=culvert" (for waterways) should be used. Best regards Ottonormalverbraucher.
dannmer (2025-12-19 20:52:45+00:00): There's a note concerning the name of a waterway added in this changeset. I've pasted the text of the note below, seems to me that the note author is correct that the name is incorrect but wanted to check first. 

"Here, the stream labeled "North Fork Republican River" flows into the Arikaree River, which then flows northeast into the real named "North Fork Republican River." This seems hydrologically implausible, but I don't have a source to confirm the actual name, whether this is a mislabeling or a special case. Leaving this note for review by local experts or those with access to better maps."

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4897951#map=16/40.01707/-102.00096&layers=N
Stretch Longfellow (2025-12-27 22:16:21+00:00): Well, this sent me down a rabbit hole, and I don't have an answer as a result. According to some state maps, this is actually and bizarrely correct. https://dot.nebraska.gov/media/v5mlid3d/cfuncdundysfc.pdf Dundy County GIS uses OSM, so that wasn't much help, and NGPC maps don't show this at all.

My inclination would be to extend Haiger Canal to the Arikaree River, as there are definitely parts that appear to be manmade (namely that really straight stretch), but I don't really have a way of confirming that.
Discostu36 (2020-08-20 11:15:04+00:00): Beachte bitte nächstes Mal, bollards auch mit der Straße zu verbinden, da sie sonst keinen Einfluss auf das Routing haben.
limes11 (2020-09-06 07:59:02+00:00): Hallo, 

du hast hier auf ein kurzes Stueck ein motor_vehicle=permit gesetzt. Meines Wissens existiert dieser Wert nicht. Wie ist das denn hier geregelt? Gibt es Autofahrer, die die Poller entfernen und dann dort durchfahren duerfen? Oder ist das fuer Notfaelle gedacht? 

Gruss, Limes
limes11 (2020-09-06 08:00:13+00:00): Und willkommen zu osm! Hatte den changesets_count nicht gesehen.
DP24PH (2020-05-29 02:27:33+00:00): Change log (20200529 101947): Standardisation of Puregold Carmona with appropriate tagging suggestions via iD editor

Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Kindly comment down here.

Much love,

DEARPAUL24
DP24PH (2020-06-07 18:11:13+00:00): [ERRATUM] Upon verification, it must be Puregold Paliparan and not Puregold Carmona. Apologies for the confusion that may occur.
luiswoo (2020-05-29 04:04:37+00:00): Закладка?
pitscheplatsch (2020-05-29 05:50:21+00:00): Hi Cannabis Map, welcome to OSM.

May we know the source of your map edit? Thanks. I guess your edit should be reviewed by a local contributor.

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
Chris Fleming (2020-06-02 21:51:47+00:00): HI, do you have any evidence of these been connected. This looks to me like 2 separate properties, each with it's own entrance?
bathines (2020-06-03 06:28:02+00:00): Hi Chris Fleming,
Thanks for looking into our edits. I have made this edit based on the aerial imagery, it is little ambiguous as it is partially covered by vegetation. Apologies, if it is  contradicting with the ground reality. Please find the changeset (86114229) for the suggested modifications. Always happy to learn from the community
Thanks 
bathines
CoyKoi (2020-05-29 08:17:15+00:00): Looking at this article from the council publication. it appears that "Eskdale Reserve Network" is a conglomeration of several named parks: https://ourauckland.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/articles/news/2020/03/north-shores-eskdale-reserve-gets-full-makeover/

Maybe in OSM it would be good to still have the individual parks identified (eg Birkenhead Domain), and then Eskdale Reserve Network as an overarching multipolygon relation.

I did see that in GeoMaps this is all called 'Eskdale Reserve', but it seems that this might not be the best representation of what's 'on the ground'.

BTW I do not personally know the area well at all, just going off that OurAuckland article and maps like this: https://ourauckland.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/media/23314/kaipatiki-kauri-explorer-2018.pdf
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85916363
Chris Fleming (2020-06-02 21:43:37+00:00): HI, do we have any evidence for this track or it's connectivity beyond the imagery?
sidhrk (2020-06-03 09:56:18+00:00): Thanks for looking into my edits. After your inputs, I have rechecked my edits and found no potential evidence to validate the added road. Apologies, reverting the changeset as per the suggestion.I will make sure all my future edits will be backed up by proper resources.thanks for the correction, always happy to learn from the community.
AkuAnakTimur (2020-05-29 04:12:07+00:00): Maxar Premium Imagery (Beta) is offset at (0,-5)
user_5359 (2020-05-30 16:05:38+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Don't add any private information from residential or owner to a residential building (or the street before the building)!
gileri (2020-05-29 06:51:58+00:00): Thank you for fixing those !
Honey Fombuena (2020-05-29 05:07:17+00:00): Added sport tags verified through live chat from Pampanga Agricultural College's Facebook Page
Cascafico (2020-05-29 08:38:25+00:00): Salve e benvenuta/o in Openstreetmap.
A pochi metri sulla mappa c'è "Azienda Agricola Mavric Stanislao": è la stessa azienda? Se no, sai dov'è?
Ornelena70 (2020-05-29 20:19:23+00:00): Salve, l’azienda Mavric non esiste da una decina di anni, è stata acquistata da Polje. Siccome sono neofita e non so come cancellarla, se lo fa lei, grazie.
user_2066394 (2020-05-29 11:27:48+00:00): statt löschen besser mit disused: markieren
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85921252
Horza (2020-06-02 03:53:21+00:00): Your changesets look good, but a brief description of what you're doing would be much appreciated. Even something as simple as "Updated parking, added building"

Thanks
Kovoschiz (2020-05-29 11:16:12+00:00): Please add `description:*=`, not clutter with generic names
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85923149
aharvey (2020-05-29 13:41:34+00:00): Hi and welcome to OSM. In general if things exist on the ground then they can be added to OSM, that includes driveways on private property. For driveways you can add the tag service=driveway and to mark access as private then access=private could be added.

I've reverted your change to reinstate these driveways.
felipeeugenio (2020-05-29 18:46:02+00:00): Estimado. Muchas gracias por sus aportes.
Sin embargo le pedimos por favor instruirse acerca de como mapear. Eso no es un parque. Puede unirse a la comunidad en https://t.me/OSMcl en nuestro chat en Telegram.
Si acaso su objetivo es sacar provecho de las áreas verdes para jugar algún juego tipo Pokemon,Go, le pedimos por favor no hacerlo. Esto es un mapa que se usa para michas labores por muchos gobiernos y empresas y necesitamos que sea real
sovereign_ch (2020-05-29 09:17:38+00:00): Hi. Für die Öffnungszeiten solltest du unbedingt die zugehörige wiki-Seite[1] durchlesen. Mit dem Semikolon hebst du die vorhergehenden Regeln für die aufgeführten Tage wieder auf; zum "addieren" muss ein Komma verwendet werden, sonst tust du den Geschäften keinen Gefallen. Konkret steht jetzt in der Anweisung nur "Mo 14:00-18:30, Tu-Fr 09:00-13:00, Sa 09:00-16:00". Zur Überprüfung eignet sich ein Evaluations-Tool[2]. Ich hab's zur Anschauung angepasst. Grüsse

[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:opening_hours
[2] https://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/
Mirkowelle (2020-05-29 10:11:49+00:00): Super, vielen Dank! Hab mir alles durchgelesen und gleich das Evaluationstool gebookmarked
Kovoschiz (2020-05-29 11:15:42+00:00): Please add `description:en=`, not clutter with generic names
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85924998
angys (2020-06-01 09:10:27+00:00): When?
gileri (2020-05-31 08:32:23+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a au moins une erreur dans ce groupe de modification : ce segment [1] n'a aucune infrastructure ou marquage cycles. J'ai corrigé ça [2].

Sur quelle source est basée ce jeu de modifications ? J'aimerais éviter que d'autres contributeurs fassent se basent sur une source pas à jour ou incorrecte.

Merci pour votre aide,

Éric

[1] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/809430615

[2] https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85960691
AssisFS (2020-05-29 21:12:33+00:00): Olá! Você percorreu a via?
portalaventura (2020-05-30 18:23:24+00:00): Não percorri.
Utilizei o que o DNIT publicou diretamente e indiretamente por meio do Ministério da Infraestrutura.
Existe alguma divergência com o que o DNIT publicou?

https://twitter.com/DNIToficial/status/1265961523404513280

https://twitter.com/MInfraestrutura/status/1265983700401037313

https://189.9.128.64/noticias/dnit-entrega-mais-43-8-quilometros-de-pista-pavimentada-na-br-432-rr
AssisFS (2020-05-30 19:14:39+00:00): Por isso a pergunta, mas como você se baseou em fontes oficiais, irei acreditar. Aparentemente um bom serviço foi feito mas ainda falta a parte de sinalização, aí só percorrendo mesmo. Vlw!
portalaventura (2020-05-30 19:40:42+00:00): Atualizei apenas a superfície.
Mas é preciso verificar a geometria, que sempre sofre melhorias, como retificações, quando uma rodovia e asfaltada.
AssisFS (2020-05-30 20:37:07+00:00): Nesse caso ou tem aguarda uma imagem de Sat. atualizada ou fazer uma trilha de GPS.
aachso (2020-05-29 13:10:34+00:00): Hello, you've used the Bing aerial imagery here. Please always check different aerial imagery and if they show different on-ground situations, try to figure out which one is the latest.

In this case, PDOK, Esri and Maxar show a newer situation compared to the outdated Bing imagery. As such, the way you created is a little inaccurate.
bashwith (2020-06-03 10:21:50+00:00): thanks for  checking into our edits. I have created the road based on bing since it is clear and the road skeleton is same as the latest iamgery. Post your suggestion, I realised that it is sligtly misaligned with the atest imagery. Please find the changeset(86129276) for the suggested modifications. i will take this as a learning from the community and reflect it in my future edits. thanks for the suggestion. always happy to learn from the community
aachso (2020-06-03 14:49:00+00:00): The road skeleton is not the same, it has been changed and is now more of a curvy path than a sharp right and left turn. IMO this is clearly visible when comparing the different aerial imagery. Also you didn't continue the service road until the end, which is something I often see from Amazon, unfortunately.

I've fixed this with CS 86141736.
abakus_uploader (2020-05-29 22:31:40+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
skfd (2020-05-29 10:37:46+00:00): Привет! Я так понимаю ето тег для очистительного завода в целом, не чисто здания. Я вернул что ето здание.
Там вся территория отмечена как water_works, может там надо отметить ето?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85929476
wargga (2020-05-29 18:12:02+00:00): Привет, можно уточнить что за тег? Все территория - это  бывший ликеро-водочный завод
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/85929476