piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ToeBee (2018-01-19 06:50:48+00:00): Paul, first of all, your original changeset comment is not really appropriate. The edit was not malicious. There is a legitimate difference of opinion on the subject. And to be honest I'm having a little trouble seeing it your way. As has been pointed out, every single sign directing drivers to this stretch of road either says "Creek Turnpike" or just "Turnpike":  

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=dwgCqidfdOdSkvEtl727ag&focus=photo
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=Bv1jtbro6rgUsR1X60JHqw&focus=photo
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=d_3rM8C8wlSBpKMKHAXTSw&focus=photo
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=Z5vS2VS0-N1zvXSG8seBVw&focus=photo

I can't even make out any signs that say Liberty Parkway on them in any Mapillary pictures. I think I spotted the two signs but the font is not big enough to resolve the letters in the images. If someone gets on in the middle of this stretch they will never see those signs and will think "what the hell is Liberty Parkway? OSM is wrong!" I would totally open a note in that situation.

To me, it is much like the "Coach Bill Snyder Highway" around here: 
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?focus=photo&pKey=P6iLlIteRwIRgEBCtco9cA

It is basically an honorary title for the road and I would not change the name of the way because of it. I actually haven't mapped this one at all (shame on me) but I would probably do it as a relation with name=Coach Bill Snyder Highway. since it follows 2 or 3 different state/federal highways along its course.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-20 16:11:21+00:00): I'm still of the opinion between the legislation that renamed it, Creek Turnpike shields being removed in favor of OK 364 shields as they wear out, the signage at either end, this segment did, in fact, get renamed.  Current destination:*=* tagging at the ramps indicates directional signage present at each location.  loc_name=* is present.  The relation for the OTA turnpike and the OklaDOT state highway are present.  All the data is there already no matter how you want to interpret it.

This is exactly the situation that happened with a long segment of OR 569 back on March 15, 2010, except in this case, the part of https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/fresxcf is being played by US Highway 266 and his sockpuppet.
cl94 (2018-01-21 04:11:44+00:00): Since when are honorary names the official name of the highway? Should we change the name of the NY Thruway to "Jewish Veterans Memorial Highway" between Exits 10 and 15 because a couple of signs and a state declarations say it is called that? Of course not.
US Highway 266 (2018-01-21 04:12:40+00:00): I'm interpreting it like it is written and as it is on the ground. I don't know how you are interpreting it the way you are. It's quite a leap of logic to say the least.
rickmastfan67 (2018-01-21 04:49:25+00:00): Paul, I honestly wouldn't be calling out others as 'sockpuppet' accounts unless you have 100% proof.  It's very unprofessional for 1 thing, and very rude at the minimum.  If you want to say it in your head, that's one thing, but don't post in public saying that unless you can back it up with 100% proof.  Stuff like that should be left for the Mods/Admins here @ OSM to do, since they would have the IP logs for the edits, something you don't have access to as far as I know.
=====
As for the subject on hand, if the two signs you mention are very small green signs, I'm 99.9% sure it's just a 'Honorary' name for this segment, and not the real name of the highway.  Take for example, this 'Rick Cessar Highway' sign ( https://goo.gl/maps/Tyrtcgmr9Wk ) on PA-8 is 100% honorary (no personal pic, but could get one if necessary), as the real name for the road in this area is 'William Flynn Highway' (posted on street blades @ intersections), and it's correctly tagged as such in OSM.  From all the evidence people have been posting above, I'm honestly in the belief that the real name of this is indeed 'Creek Turnpike', and not 'Liberty Parkway' as you claim.  Do you have any proof that the 'Liberty Parkway' name is on any BGS as of right now, as that's the only way I could personally see you having a leg to stand on in reference for the name tag along the way(s) themselves.  Otherwise, the 'Liberty Parkway' name should be in a different tag, like 'name:honorary', IMO.  But to be fully honest here Paul, I think you're in a loosing battle.  The evidence does seem to be very stacked against ya here.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-21 04:49:39+00:00): Honorary names are typically on signage distinctive from the rest of the highway names.  That's not the case here.  Wasn't the case on OR 569, either.  But, US 26 has a brown signed section over Sylvan Hill honorarily naming it after some soldier, and still signed as Sunset Highway.  Not the case with Randy Papé Beltline, not the case with Liberty Parkway.

If you're interested in the route Creek Turnpike, then take a look at this relation (https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1250474) instead.
US Highway 266 (2018-01-21 04:54:14+00:00): There are NO big green signs with "Liberty Parkway" on them. None. There are several, however, with "Creek Turnpike" on them. If your theory were true, it would be prominently displayed on the overhead signs. As has been noted before, there are only two signs with "Liberty Parkway" on them and NO signs with "Liberty Memorial Parkway" on them. "Liberty Memorial Parkway is only found in a PDF of a bill that was never passed. There is no question that "Creek Turnpike" is the correct name of the road.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-21 05:03:16+00:00): Your assertion is correct for the relation above, not the road subject to this changeset.
Duke87 (2018-02-20 03:22:41+00:00): Okay it's been a month and no further comments. I count six in favor of "Creek Turnpike" being the primary name and one in favor of "Liberty Parkway". Can we consider there to be a consensus to this effect at this point?
Baloo Uriza (2018-02-20 04:16:06+00:00): I don't think so.  Again, it's still signed as the road being Liberty Parkway and the route as Creek Turnpike.

Timeline for how this was developed is this:

* Highway was built as an unnumbered route, with Creek Turnpike route shields.
* State renames this segment as Liberty Parkway; route name remains Creek Turnpike.
* Broken Arrow builds the Liberty Parkway Trail, named after the highway.
* State assigns the route OK 364, Creek Turnpike shields being phased out.
* Wayfinding signs for the *route* still read Creek Turnpike.
* Name signs for this segment still say Liberty Parkway.
US Highway 266 (2018-02-20 05:26:25+00:00): Paul, remember when you claimed that the portion of OK 364 east of the Muskogee Turnpike was "Liberty Parkway" and that there was a sign just south of I-44 identifying it as such? I proved you wrong and you removed it. Remember when you claimed the Creek Turnpike was "Liberty Memorial Parkway" even though that name isn't even a tertiary name of the road? I keep proving you wrong and you keep moving the goalposts. What is it going to take for you to realize that you're wrong and that you're getting out of towners lost? I've provided tons of evidence from many different sources. You have provided two signs (that you don't have pictures of) and the text of a bill that died on the floor. I don't like arguing with you but if you continue to purposely confuse motorists I'm going to do everything I can to make sure the correct name is on the map.
iandees (2018-01-12 02:40:23+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55367762
iandees (2018-01-12 02:44:12+00:00): Thanks for your addition! It looks like you draw the park twice, so I removed one of the duplicates and put the playground in the correct place.
user_5359 (2018-01-12 06:04:34+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the house number, please? If there isn't an address there, please use the key is_in instead or let the key empty.
iandees (2018-01-12 02:43:09+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55367857
muralito (2018-02-27 16:03:08+00:00): ¿y si es doblemano porque le borras el oneway=no que justamente hace eso explicito?
DOA1 (2018-02-27 16:33:20+00:00): hola, Claramente me equivoqué, porque la ruta 42 nunca intenté editarla.
DOA1 (2018-02-27 16:37:05+00:00): Ya lo volví a poner oneway=no
tonyf1 (2018-01-12 02:28:56+00:00): Hi. You have mapped a shop=alcohol named Ron Gol Station. There's nothing there and an unlikely place for a shop to have been built since the last satellite photo. There is a farm nearby. What were you intending to map and what is your data source? Thanks.
CloCkWeRX (2018-01-14 06:57:45+00:00): I think its meant to map the vineyard, see the "Ron Gol" farm POI further south.
tonyf1 (2018-01-14 22:49:22+00:00): Thanks CloCkWeRX. The Ron Gol Station node was moved south by user TheSwavu, renamed Ron Gol and retagged as a farm in Changeset #55374816
JJIglesias (2018-01-12 04:22:30+00:00): Slds. Por favor visita:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Bolivia:Map_Features
Rasterfarian89 (2019-05-20 21:20:16+00:00): Fixing an incorrect names placed on features. Please refrain for corrupting the data by adding your name to features. Many communities rely on the accuracy of OSM data.
viloan (2018-01-12 02:31:29+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
iandees (2018-01-12 02:44:47+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55368443
eggie (2018-01-12 07:06:53+00:00): Welkom bij OSM per PB verstuurd
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Welkom_op_OSM

Niet simpelweg iets omzetten in een park. 
Een park is een (uitgestrekt) terrein, omvattende stukken grasveld, bos en bosschages, vijvers, paden etc. Het is een soort deken over al het andere heen. Bovendien heeft het meestal een naam. 

Leisure is de functie van een gebied.. landuse is wat je ziet. Dat heb je nu allemaal verwijderd en vervangen door een lege transparant.
Hier een voorbeeld van een park met een losse cover Leisure park over alles heen.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/51.80552/4.66665

Je edits zullen worden teruggedraaid.
Ook door het commentaar "ok" is niet erg duidelijk wat je aan het doen bent.
eggie (2018-01-12 07:17:11+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55371791
viloan (2018-01-12 02:46:07+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-01-12 07:18:31+00:00): reverted due to pokemon vandalism by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/55371785
iandees (2018-01-12 03:24:12+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55368611
Alan Bragg (2018-01-13 22:18:54+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55368648
chnav (2018-01-13 08:14:12+00:00): Дом исправил. Чего не могу понять КАК вы умудрились воткнуть свой дом в маршрут автобуса №74 )) Подчистил.
eggie (2018-01-12 07:19:54+00:00): reverted due to pokemonvandalism
eggie (2018-01-12 07:24:10+00:00): changeset revert 55371774
JJIglesias (2018-01-12 04:22:00+00:00): Saludos, por favor visita:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Bolivia:Map_Features
5m4u9 (2018-01-12 06:18:50+00:00): hola, mucha confusión entre mapear el mirador y el parque y los distintos niveles del suelo
//
no te tienes que complicar tanto
eggie (2018-01-12 07:19:37+00:00): reverted due to pokemon vandalism
eggie (2018-01-12 07:58:17+00:00): revert Wijzigingenset #55371756
iandees (2018-01-12 03:25:35+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55368800
eggie (2018-01-12 07:19:21+00:00): reverted due to pokemon vandalism
eggie (2018-01-12 07:58:49+00:00): revert Wijzigingenset #55371747
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-12 03:37:47+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55369043
obubison1 (2018-01-12 03:51:40+00:00): Paul,
Thanks for helping me understand the need to not hit a nearby street with the outlines of a park.
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:22:16+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55369084
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:22:31+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55369100
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:22:50+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55369148
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:23:15+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55369187
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:23:57+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55369198
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:24:18+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55369225
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:29:49+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55369238
Baloo Uriza (2018-01-13 03:30:24+00:00): Hello!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55369254
user_5359 (2018-01-12 06:02:52+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag area=yes without any more information is useless. What do you want to achieve with your entry? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552499400 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552499411. Note that in OSM description of the objects has the highest priority. Objects that have only one name, have little sense. As home page for the question "How do I describe you?" I recommend the web site http://wiki.openstreetmap.org. 
Please read also https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Ddog_park
carfog81 (2018-01-19 22:31:25+00:00): Este parque ya se encuentra adicionado
Richard (2018-03-26 11:28:50+00:00): Hi - you've tagged TX 361 as forbidden to bicycles in this changeset. Is that really the case? (Seems a bit unusual given the nice wide shoulders but I thought I'd check!)
The Only Sarge (2018-03-26 15:02:17+00:00): The added a lane in each direction in certain areas and did away with the bike lane when they did it.
Richard (2018-03-26 15:03:14+00:00): Ok, understood - are bikes actually banned though?
The Only Sarge (2018-03-26 15:12:41+00:00): That I do not know.
Richard (2018-03-26 15:23:49+00:00): Ok, thanks. I'll remove the bicycle=no tags then in the absence of any other evidence. Thanks for all your edits :)
eggie (2018-01-12 07:19:04+00:00): reverted due to pokemon vandalism
eggie (2018-01-12 07:22:48+00:00): changeset 55369726 3dshapes hersteld
eggie (2018-01-12 07:13:14+00:00): Je changesets zijn allemaal teruggedraaid.

Wees even voorzichtig met het aanbrengen van nieuwe edits. 
Mocht je op deze manier doorgaan zal er overwogen worden een (tijdelijke) stop op je account te plaatsen. 
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
eggie (2018-01-12 07:21:47+00:00): revretd by changeset 55371729
agranizo (2018-01-13 13:41:18+00:00): Por favor, tener mas cuidado al hacer ediciones.  En este cambio se editó la Avenida Heroes de Tapi y uno de los carriles conducía en contravía. Ya está corregido el error.

Saludos, 

agranizo
mavl (2018-12-25 00:42:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Minh Nguyen (2018-01-12 10:44:50+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55370139
naoliv (2018-01-12 10:52:22+00:00): Reverted in changeset #55376267
marc__marc (2021-02-20 17:36:23+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/552509043
boules=yes a-t-il une signification particulière ?
Cordialement,
Marc
Fabrice Bouyé (2021-02-20 20:11:46+00:00): Bonjour, voir https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:sport=boules?uselang=en
marc__marc (2021-02-21 07:45:48+00:00): Bonjour,
j'ai bien relu, nulle part je vois la signification de yes, le mot n'est même pas présent sur la page.
donc le sens supposé est que yes est la valeur générique pour n'importe quelle variante, ce qui n'est pas faux mais est deja dit avec sport=boules.
Mais vu le nom, je pensais que boules=petanque était peut-être plus adapté, sauf si le terrain est adapté aux différentes variantes.
Cordialement,
Marc
Fabrice Bouyé (2021-02-21 09:09:19+00:00): Il s'agira sans doute alors d'un tag qui a été déprécié et a changé de fonction depuis.
Fabrice Bouyé (2021-02-21 09:11:38+00:00): Pour être plus précis il y a 3 ans dans le type de sport il fallait choisir Bocce pour les terrains de pétanque dans l'interface web d'édition d'OSM. Il est probable que depuis ils aient retravaillé la manière dont ces tags fonctionnent en introduisant le tag boules=(bocce/pétanque, etc.)
Minh Nguyen (2018-01-12 10:45:11+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55370163
Constable (2018-01-12 10:49:42+00:00): Looks like this changeset only removed objects which looked legit and messed up some roads, why did you do that? what were you trying to do?
https://nrenner.github.io/achavi/?changeset=55370163
naoliv (2018-01-12 10:51:03+00:00): @Constable see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/1703
naoliv (2018-01-12 10:52:33+00:00): And for the record, it was reverted in changeset #55376267
Constable (2018-01-12 10:53:25+00:00): Hi, thanks, I didn't see that. Thanks for the reverts as well!
mavl (2018-12-25 00:29:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].
Minh Nguyen (2018-01-12 10:44:57+00:00): Hello!
            Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
            I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and found some errors or elements
            that could be mapped in a better way. Feel free to message me
            to know more about it or visit http://learnosm.org/ to get started.
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55370195
naoliv (2018-01-12 10:52:36+00:00): Reverted in changeset #55376267
mavl (2018-12-24 23:30:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 65744804, 65751034, 65750264, 65748673 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [DWG has the request to revert the changesets. Reason: poor mapping, damage - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/2400].