piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
maraf24 (2021-12-14 12:33:01+00:00): To są jakieś dziwne zmiany. Jakie jest źródło?
nanzop (2021-12-14 14:11:32+00:00): ja bylem w tym miejscu naprawde i wszystko widziałem. nie wiem dlaczego są dziwne
RicoElectrico (2021-12-14 16:30:07+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_komentarze_zestawu_zmian oraz https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Znakowanie_dr%C3%B3g_w_Polsce#Nazewnictwo_ulic
Cristoffs (2021-12-14 16:35:00+00:00): Jak dla mnie ten parking przy Rubieży to jest żle narysowany. Nie powinien być pod budynkami.  Poczytaj trochę co Ci Rico podesłał.
nanzop (2021-12-14 17:39:21+00:00): nastepnym razem będę wszystko dobże robil
Mex (2021-12-14 13:54:52+00:00): "Cyclist dismount" signs have no meaning in UK law. If there is no end cycle lane sign in theory the path continues past the cyclists dismount sign.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114891338
papapam (2021-12-17 17:15:50+00:00): Burası hâlâ inşa halinde.
turankaya74 (2021-12-17 17:26:33+00:00): Yine haritada temiz bir sekilde görünsün
papapam (2021-12-18 09:51:31+00:00): Haritada güzel gözükmesi için yanlış veri girmek bence doğru değil.
ov_079 (2021-12-15 14:51:03+00:00): Let op: Rijdt in de ochtendspits stoppend van Houten Castellum naar Utrecht Centraal en non-stop van Utrecht Centraal naar Houten Castellum en in de middagspits andersom.
GEOIG (2021-12-13 17:28:57+00:00): Added Toyota dealer according to official site http://www.legiocars.toyota.es/ and user's feedback
EneaSuper (2021-12-14 09:10:50+00:00): Ciao, in questo articolo è riportato il futuro nome della strada. Sarà intitolata a Vittorio Pertusio:

https://www.genova24.it/2021/11/ponte-morandi-il-belvedere-di-coronata-sara-intitolato-a-mirko-vicini-284995/?fbclid=IwAR2_fzSzabH_MJAZRy8iVoCmOliVIfZc6YafxT4_OPG3o2W3sgX3531epFk
George McManus (2021-12-13 23:58:21+00:00): Hi Brent,

do you know how to straighten buildings (pressing "Q", can also be done segment-wise)?
dieterdreist (2024-02-12 11:24:33+00:00): Buongiorno, ho notato che way 1011834469 è inserito in modo che vieta il transito per pedoni, ma allo stesso momento fa parte di una route turistica per pedoni. Forse manca un foot=yes / designated? Oppure si dovrebbe mettere bicycle=yes invece di designated?
Saluti
Martin
granpasso811 (2024-02-12 17:42:10+00:00): Buonasera, sì a mio parere dovrebbe essere bicycle=yes.
Saluti
dieterdreist (2024-02-12 23:18:41+00:00): grazie, ho cambiato questo e nel seguito da bicycle=designated in bicycle=yes
mueschel (2021-12-14 17:49:02+00:00): Hi,
please check the areas you added here, some have only foreign tags and no proper OSM tags, like this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011835173
DiogoBaptista98 (2021-12-15 19:16:37+00:00): thank you so much, I already corrected it
lonnez (2021-12-14 04:01:15+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to OpenStreetMap! I assume this is based on your experience seeing this there. If so, I'd recommend specifying a "source" when submitting your changeset. Based on aerial, it does appear the house was removed, so I assume this is the case. Thanks again!
Trevor_1 (2022-07-31 16:05:11+00:00): Hello. Why did you create this parking area here? This is a concrete median. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9335200882

In fact, many of the parking areas you added in this changeset are wrong. The road here https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9335200871 is a dead-end that was built for possible future extension of the frontage road.
kevinp2 (2022-07-31 17:13:52+00:00): Hi!

I had left a Fixme tag for verification of the possible parking area.  I have now deleted it:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/93352008

For the other parking area:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/93352008
I have personally verified that this is a parking area, used frequently by semis and other large vehicles, likely because parking and rest areas are sorely lacking along that stretch of highway.

While its intended use may be different, we must map what is actually happening on the ground, which is that people are parking there.  If TxDOT wants to not have people park there, they can post a No Parking sign.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Map_what's_on_the_ground
Allison P (2022-08-01 06:05:45+00:00): A place does not become a parking lot because people park there. That is not what "on the ground" means. That is ridiculous.
kevinp2 (2022-08-01 06:21:13+00:00): I will happily bet you that at least 40% of parking areas and parking lots in OSM have no sign or designation on the ground whatsoever, yet people park there in real life for some reason :-)

If you don't want the truck drivers to park there, you should tell them.  Of course, they will ask you where they should park instead...
Glassman (2021-12-13 21:23:52+00:00): Can you explain what exactly this edit is supposed to do? It certainly doesn't seem to use the imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114893385
VLD181 (2021-12-13 21:38:38+00:00): @Glassman I am only fixing invalid crossings on Map Roulette, way 6078803 was created by username: DaveHansenTiger if you want to ask about imagery alignment
iandees (2021-12-13 21:52:58+00:00): While this solves the invalid crossing, it doesn't improve the data. Please also try to align the way with the roads you see in the imagery.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114893385
Glassman (2021-12-13 21:56:41+00:00): We are well aware of the dave hansen tiger import. 

Could I ask you not to make these edits without actually improving of the quality of the data?
VLD181 (2021-12-13 22:06:34+00:00): Yes, I will make sure to improve the quality of data going forward.
hsc666 (2021-12-13 20:03:19+00:00): Hallo Krah1977 und willkommen!

In OSM werden keine privaten Informationen abgelegt. Ich habe Deine Änderung daher wieder zurückgesetzt.

VG
hsc666
GEOIG (2021-12-13 19:14:44+00:00): Added dealer according to official site http://www.hergefi.toyota.es/instalaciones/toyota-andujar and user's feedback
jleedev (2021-12-13 23:23:52+00:00): Verify whether the step_count will be the same or different.
Sandal man (2022-01-19 19:51:06+00:00): Hola compañero mapeador, gracias por tus ajustes al osm pero no puedes dibujar dos caminos uno encima del otro.
Si se trata de un carril bici, debe estar junto a la carretera original o se deben adaptar las etiquetas de esa carretera.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011854276
Saludos Jan
Sandal man (2022-02-02 16:35:47+00:00): Dividí el carril bici porque no hubo respuesta.
Cleveland steamer (2022-01-10 15:32:37+00:00): mistake https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/115971599
lonnez (2021-12-14 03:56:43+00:00): Hey. Thanks for your contributions to OpenStreetMap. My only recommendation would be to avoid the name= tag when describing a feature. For example, I suspect the sandtrap isn't named "#8 Sand Trap 1", but rather might be a description more fitting for description= tag. Happy mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114895347
George McManus (2021-12-14 00:03:38+00:00): Hi wireguy,

do beginners like https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Brent%20Haselhoff/history get money from AWS for their contribution?
wireguy (2021-12-14 00:06:34+00:00): Why would I know about him?
I can tell you that I do not work for AWS, am not paid, just a volunteer.
Why do you ask?
George McManus (2021-12-14 00:26:58+00:00): Hi wireguy,

I know that you are a volunteer, very productive along with it. Are these mappers AWS employees or is AWS sponsoring the Hackathon?
Sandal man (2022-01-08 19:44:23+00:00): Hola, gracias por tus ajustes en el osm, pero no puedes dibujar dos caminos uno encima del otro.
eggie (2021-12-13 20:39:13+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 
Feedback:  Binnen OSM taggen we uitsluitend bedrijven bij op de adresnodes. Dus niet op de gebouwomtrek. 
De adresnode met bedrijfsinfo ligt nu buiten het gebouw. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2021-12-13 20:43:32+00:00): De info staat nu alleen op de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
Mashin (2021-12-16 22:16:01+00:00): Hi, 
Thanks for editing!

The one thing I would like to point out is that golf green and fairway should not overlap. Please see:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course#Common_mapping_pitfalls
djerm (2022-02-09 19:29:21+00:00): Sorry, I am just now realizing that people have been commenting on my changesets, and only just now found out the way to respond.

In the future I will be sure they do not overlap, and follow community guidelines when mapping greens and fairways. Thank you for reaching out.
BeKri (2021-12-13 20:25:12+00:00): Servus,
wenn 2 das gleiche tun ;-))
Kommt selten vor, aber grad hamma beide das Selbe gemacht, aber Du warst schneller.
Schau bitte trotzem kurz drüber 
ob beim lösen von Konflikten was daneben gegangen ist.
Wir haben übrigens einen sehr änhlichen TaggingStil 
https://ibb.co/qJb3cWg
https://ibb.co/hmVjgQm

Ich geh jetzt wieder mehr in den Osten, wenn Du hier weitermachst
Happytagging und gsundblaim
derBeKri
EvaUnterwegs (2021-12-13 20:39:15+00:00): Guten Abend,
das ist ja ein Zufall! Ich hatte mich schon gewundert, dass die zweite Maproulette-Aufgabe verschwunden  war... Konflikte habe ich keine gefunden :)

Viele Grüße
Eva
skyper (2023-01-26 20:52:40+00:00): Hallo Bernhard,
`man_made=communications_tower` bezeichnet Fernseh- und Fernmeldetürme. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9335534576 sieht aber nach einem Mast (man_made=mast) aus. Kannst Du das bitte nochmal überprüfen? Siehe auch https://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/22677.

Danke und Grüße,
skyper
BeKri (2023-03-13 13:43:40+00:00): Servus,
hast natürlich recht ;-))
geändert ...
happy tagging der BeKri
MarcoR (2021-12-15 17:34:33+00:00): Ciao e benvenuta/o!
Gli indirizzi civici in Italia sono associati agli ingressi che si affacciano sulla strada e di solito andrebbero aggiunti in un nodo separato posizionato nel punto in cui è presente la tipica targhetta col numero civico. Vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Addresses#Regole_specifiche_per_l.27Italia per maggiori informazioni.

A presto,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114896382
Frans S (2022-02-06 11:05:22+00:00): Hello Jordy, Thanks for mapping here
A few remarks
When you map roads , don't let them snap to the borders of residential areas.
road needs to be connected to each other (where the traces continue) You must have seen the warnings about connecting the roads to residential areas before you uploaded your work.
Also take the width into account. Most roads can be mapped as unclassified (unpaved)  (2 mtr  wide >)
Best regards and keep mapping
user_5359 (2021-12-16 18:45:44+00:00): Hello! Please check the description of http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1011871063!
mueschel (2021-12-17 17:37:54+00:00): Hi,
"additional levels" is an uncommon key. Could you explain what it means? Maybe levels under the roof? 

Thanks!
Jan
Lilith2512 (2021-12-17 20:02:18+00:00): Hi,
"Additional levels" show the number of the levels/floors added to the existing building or to a part of it.
mueschel (2021-12-17 20:04:25+00:00): If these are regular levels, you can add them to "building:levels" - this is always the actual size of the building. If you want to keep track of the previous state, you can use a tag like "was:building:levels".
user_5359 (2021-12-26 16:36:32+00:00): Hello, please use only one writing "additional levels" or "Additional levels". Can you please explain the "additional" on http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/82550815?
    Additional levels=1
    building:levels=4
user_5359 (2021-12-27 10:55:39+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9335532304. Did you mean access=customers instead of yes=customers?
Немец из тумана (2021-12-27 11:18:09+00:00): Hi! Thank you for noticing. This node is a garbage left after ungluing. I will remove it in the next changeset.
MarcoR (2021-12-15 17:41:51+00:00): Ciao e bnvenuta/o!
Le strade private non andrebbero eliminate perché in genere possono essere percorse sia dai proprietari che dai corrieri, postini e mezzi di soccorso. La soluzione ideale sarebbe quella di usare il tag access=private e mappare gli eventuali cancelli; tra l'altro non c'è alcuna garanzia che un altro mappatore, ignaro della situazione, mappi nuovamente tali strade vedendole sulle immagini aeree. Per maggiori informazioni vedi https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Key:access

A presto,
Marco.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114896803
enricodell (2021-12-15 18:40:27+00:00): Ciao, grazie per la precisazione. Sul commento purtroppo mi sono espresso male. Ciò che ho cancellato e modificato è una strada che non esiste e non è mai esistita. Si tratta di una traccia passante all'interno di un piazzale privato e delimitato da un cancello. Inoltre dalle immagini aeree non è possibile visualizzare tale traccia poiché come ho detto non esiste. 
Il motivo di tale modifica è a causa dell'errata interpretazione dei luoghi da parte delle applicazioni di "attività fisica" che portano gli utenti a percorrere tracciati non percorribili.
MarcoR (2021-12-15 21:31:20+00:00): Grazie per la risposta! 
Scusa se insisto, ma tra "Via del Capitello" e l'azienda io dalle immagini aeree una stradina con superficie mista erbosa/terrosa la vedo abbastanza bene :)
Non è sicuramente una "strada" in senso stretto ma dà l'idea di un percorso che sembrerebbe percorribile (almeno fisicamente) a piedi o su un trattore; se è presente un cancello, si può aggiungere anche quello con barrier=gate, cfr. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:Tag:barrier%3Dgate .

Comunque, non essendo del posto, mi rimetto alla tua conoscenza locale e lascio tutto come è adesso ;)

Buon mapping,
Marco.
*Martin* (2021-12-15 12:57:30+00:00): Ahoj. To su tam 2 rovnake razcestniky?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9335559580
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/641897067
laznik (2021-12-15 15:40:32+00:00): Dakujem za upozornenie. Smernik som presunul (skopiroval) z cesty na oddedely nod, ale tagy som zabudol vymazat. Opravene.
*Martin* (2021-12-15 15:42:49+00:00): lepsie je v JSOM pouzit funkciu "extract node" ktora to spravi sama a naviac zachova historiu.
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-15 15:27:49+00:00): Good change.  I would extend the trunk routing all the way to US-460 through Pearisburg.
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-15 15:32:32+00:00): Good change to fill in the gap.  I suspect US-29 east of I-66 should be downgraded to primary all the way to Arlington since it's paralleled by I-66.  I would also downgrade the section of US-29 that runs through the cloverleaf intersection with 495 to match the surrounding road, since a single intersection doesn't qualify a road as motorway.
Joseph R P (2021-12-15 16:25:07+00:00): Well the part of US 29 that parallels I 66 is still a heavily-trafficked highway that can act as an alternative and is built up the 'urban trunk road' standards. US 29 also does not have any interchange with I 495, just an overpass. Are you speaking of the series of interchanges along US 50?
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-15 16:48:31+00:00): Around West Falls Church, there's an intersection between US-50 and the Capitol Beltway - that's the intersection I'm talking about.
ZeLonewolf (2021-12-15 16:51:20+00:00): Re: classification, when we worked https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States/2021_Highway_Classification_Guidance in other states, one of the things we did was to de-trunk roads that were parallel alternates to motorways, considering the combined trunk/motorway network as a coherent entity.  There's still some question about whether that is still the right approach in big cities (DC definitely counts) so it's kind of an open question.  That's why I really think we need to sort out some kind of agreement on Virginia (see link to 23 other state implementations in wiki link above) so that there's no question on the trunk/primary distinction -- we can just run around upgrading and downgrading according to that standard.
Joseph R P (2021-12-15 17:31:25+00:00): If US 29 had really nothing around it or was more of a frontage road then I would agree it should be primary but since, although it parallels I-66, it is a regionally important highway that forms a consistent straight route from Charlottesville to DC. I'd prefer to keep it trunk instead of creating more gaps while in the process of filling them. Apart from some minor roads and some Maryland instances, the DC Metro/NoVa region seems to have a fairly reasonably-tagged road network that provides different instances of road tag applications and can be a useful reference.
rab (2021-12-18 10:34:36+00:00): Hallo,
du baust hier gerade ein totales Flächenchaos. Das wird in Zukunft nicht mehr bearbeitbar sein. Und bitte nicht alle Objekte mit überflüssigen tags auffüllen.
Lokai (2021-12-18 11:01:27+00:00): Hallo,

scrub überschneidet sich mit der Polizeistation.

Gruß

L
Herwescheluc (2021-12-18 13:48:33+00:00): Hallo Lokai!
scrub entfernt, müßte jetzt ok sein.
Gruß
Andreas
---
Hallo rab!
1.) Meinst Du Flächenchaos durch vernähen? Oder habe ich irgendwo "gepfuscht"?
2.) Was sind "überflüssige" Tags - ich richte mich nach den vorhanden Möglichkeiten und den passenden Einträgen der wiki, passe mich aber gern der allgemeinen Meinung an!
Hilfe und Erläuterung sind mir als Anfänger stets willkomen - nur Lesen allein bildet eben nicht...
Gruß
Andreas
Eifelkobold! (2021-12-13 21:02:22+00:00): Ergänzung source: NRW DOP; NRW ALKIS
literan (2021-12-14 17:17:19+00:00): ну и зачем вырезал середину вокзала из его контура? придется отменить
RFuser11 (2021-12-14 19:52:19+00:00): ага, неудачное решение
Andrea Musuruane (2021-12-14 13:50:51+00:00): Ciao Luca. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/481283904 Se questa è una tettoia deve essere etichettata solo con building=roof. amenity=shelter è un una piccola struttura atta a proteggere dalle intemperie. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114898048
Mohamed BOUHMIDI (2021-12-15 17:17:27+00:00): Store exists and open actualy
danieldegroot2 (2021-12-14 15:16:24+00:00): Beste Paul,

Voor nieuwe gebouwen en adressen graag een BAG import verzoeken op het forum.
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=52973&p=401

Groet,

Daniel
blackboxlogic (2021-12-14 03:39:05+00:00): Addresses at minimum have a street name and a house number. You've left off the house number for this building. If it doesn't have one, then it isn't an address and the other address tags should be removed.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/114898979
RunTrails (2022-07-26 18:51:00+00:00): Hey you somehow created hundreds of Points/Nodes with no tags no nothing. I don't want to delete them if you can use them.
miha12 (2022-07-27 15:30:43+00:00): Hi. The nodes without tags are not standalone. They are parts of the newly created buildings. You can see it by checking the details for a node. Let me know if you have more questions.
RunTrails (2022-07-27 16:35:24+00:00): Weird, they're all gone now. Sorry to trouble you! :D
Vladimír Domes (2022-02-09 21:39:59+00:00): Dobrý den,
je v pořádku, že jste zastávku VŠB-TUO pojmenoval jako "Poruba, VŠB-TUO" ?
Na zastávce i v jízdních řádech je uvedeno jen "VŠB-TUO".

Ze seznamu zastávek v tomto changesetu je podle mě (a podle IDOSu) správně jen "Poruba, garáže".
Minimalis (2022-02-10 09:29:31+00:00): Dobrý den,
Máte pravdu. Ostrava má v JŘ krátkou variantu. IDOS má obě varianty.
Na http://portal.idos.cz/ je v seznamu zastávek pro MHD Ostrava krátká varianta a v JŘ dlouhá - "Ostrava,Poruba,VŠB-TUO".
Např. linka 915005.
Ostrava má stará data. https://mapy.ostrava.cz/data/otevrena-data/opendata-info/
Vycházím z krajských dat https://gis.msk.cz/arcgis/rest/services/public/dsh_bus/MapServer + https://portal.cisjr.cz/pub/seznamy/ (zastavky.csv). 
Tam je dlouhý název, který u MHD zkracuji o název obce, což v OStravě nefunguje. Někde mají část obce (Poruba) a jinde nemají, což je přípustné i když nekonzistentní.
Revert nic neřeší protože jsou přejmenované. "VŠB-TUO" byl "Rektorát VŠB". Proto volím klasický edit. Děkuji za upozornění, názvy zkrátím.
violavoelker (2024-09-09 08:47:25+00:00): Lieber Garstedter, 
beim Objekt https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/75322530#map=16/53.21964/10.17857 wurde smoothness=excellent getaggt, inzwischen erscheint mir nach eigener Erhebung in diesem Jahr der Wert "good" passender und ich würde den Wert dahingehend ändern. Hoffe das ist in Ordnung. Viele Grüße Viola
Garstedter (2024-09-09 19:22:23+00:00): Das sollte passen. Im letzten Winter haben die Straßen ja mächtig gelitten, kannst das gerne anpassen.
Gruß
Garstedter
violavoelker (2024-09-10 10:11:02+00:00): Lieber Garstedter, 
vielen Dank für die schnelle Antwort. Ich habe bei einer weiteren Straße in Salzhausen einen ähnlichen Befund, https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24792930#map=19/53.226088/10.167814, würde das dann auch ändern? Im Rahmen des Projektes Lüneburg Maps sind wir in diesem Sommer Salzhausen komplett mit dem Fahrrad abgefahren und haben die Wegeigenschaften dokumentiert und ich bin nun dabei diese in die OSM einzupflegen. Falls das bei noch weiteren Strecken auffällt, wäre es in Ordnung wenn ich das dort dann ggf. ebenfalls anpasse? Liebe Grüße Viola
violavoelker (2024-09-10 15:30:05+00:00): Lieber Garstedter, eine weitere Anmerkung, ich möchte aber nicht einfach kommentarlos getaggte Werte ändern, deswegen schreibe ich hier: 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/24846374 der Bürgersteig innerorts ist nach unserem Wissenstand nicht für Fahrräder freigegeben zumindest nicht rechtlich, da es kein Verkehrsschild oder aber eine bauliche Kennzeichnung diesbezüglich gibt. In dem Abschnitt siehe Link ist aber ein Radweg getaggt gewesen. Habe es jetzt geändert, kann es aber auch rückgängig machen, falls ich falsch liege. Gruß Viola
Garstedter (2024-09-12 20:53:35+00:00): Wenn du/ihr feststellt, dass die Werte, die in der Datenbank stehen nicht mehr mit der Realität übereinstimmen, könnt ihr das immer gerne ändern. Das ist ja der Sinn von OSM und auch der Grund für die Aktualität der meisten Daten.

Zu zweiterem. Da wirds schnell schwierig … wenn der Weg klar als reiner Fußweg beschildert ist, klare Sache, dann sind Fahrräder da nicht erlaubt. Wenn aber überhaupt kein Schild da steht, dann wird das je nachdem wer mitliest, gerne kontrovers diskutiert wie das genau zu taggen ist. Ich würde sagen, ein Weg ohne Beschilderung darf per se sowohl von Fußgängern als auf Radfahrern genutzt werden. Aber wie gesagt, da kann es kompliziert werden.
skyper (2022-01-03 20:16:20+00:00): Hallo RicoSc

`public_transport=platform` gehört immer neben die Straße, zusammen mit `highway=bus_stop` und der Infrastruktur. Der Haltepunkt auf der Straße ist `public_transport=stop_position` (z.B. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5083316037).

Grüße skyper
mueschel (2021-12-14 17:57:36+00:00): Hallo,
das 'destination' Tag hat seine eigene Art verschiedene Sprachen anzugeben. Nicht "destination:XX", sondern "destination:lang:XX". Kannst du das korrigieren?  Das zusätzliche "lang:" ist nötig um keine Verwechslungen zu erzeugen, z.B. bei "destination:to".

Grüße
Jan
rouelibre1 (2022-08-31 14:19:07+00:00): Les parkings vélo sont-ils en souterrain ? Je suis passé à côté, depuis la surface pas moyen de comprendre ce que sont ces structures métalliques tout en grilles qui semblent protéger des entrées de service, ni combien de places il pourrait y avoir dans des parkings souterrains. Il y avait un vélo accroché aux grilles en surface, mais je doute que ce soit la raison du signalement de ces structures comme parkings vélo
fnuttens (2022-08-31 15:28:16+00:00): Mea-culpa, je n'étais jamais allé les voir de près, pensant que c'était des parkings payants comme on en voit parfois. Il semblent en effet abriter des entrées de service.

J'ai fait la correction dans ce changeset : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125617654