piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-03-15 18:31:57+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9560609430/history has construction = construction that was added in this edit (if I checked things correctly)
What construction=construction means? What you wanted to express by using this tag?
kjp2023 (2023-06-05 01:08:20+00:00): Name is no longer correct, see Canadian geonames item 8a108ab206f84836b5cccbd625fd97bd; it should be called Banen Island as of 2020
kjp2023 (2023-06-05 01:09:19+00:00): correction see https://geonames.nrcan.gc.ca/search-place-names/unique?id=8a108ab206f84836b5cccbd625fd97bd
gscholz (2022-06-02 04:27:42+00:00): Hi kseltar,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-57.51842&lat=-25.36565&zoom=12&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=119680900

Can you please fix this?

My impression is, you do not know how to handle multipolygon relations properly. Please educate yourself:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind Regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:18:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Kovoschiz (2022-04-14 11:31:37+00:00): `name=` is for the most common name in existing public use. 

N-th reminder: `name=` and `place=` are the existing common name and concepts in public use, not what you think should be correct or proper. Use `old_name=` as needed, which says it's the original, not whether something is correct or wrong. Put historic names and locations  in OpenHistoricalMap, not OSM. Discuss with the community, where the Discord server (https://discord.com/invite/CyG9zte) has been made available in OSM Community Index for a long time already, and there is a wiki project (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hong_Kong). Use descriptive changeset comments. Don't use changeset comments for expressing your opinion in a debate. Respect the  One Feature, One Object rule, not mixing features up.
marczoutendijk (2022-04-16 11:56:31+00:00): Hi cyberatlas,
Once more:
The only changeset comment you use is: "aktualizacja".
That is what we all do, but it is much nicer for your fellow mappers if you explain a bit more what exactly you have edit.
Please read:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

[DeepL]:
Cześć cyberatlas,
Jeszcze raz:
Jedyny komentarz changeset, którego używasz, to: "aktualizacja".
To jest to, co wszyscy robimy, ale jest to o wiele milsze dla Twoich kolegów mapperów, jeśli wyjaśnisz nieco więcej, co dokładnie edytowałeś.
Proszę przeczytać:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2022-04-16 06:39:08+00:00): Hello! You add five recycling containers with very unusual tags (I don't wish to quote). Please clean up!
dcapillae (2022-04-16 13:30:11+00:00): Cleaned up. Thank you for your collaboration.
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-07-17 13:37:20+00:00): Esta jerarquía parece demasiado alta para un camino muy precario que apenas se usa y no conduce a una gran población. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1051640754
erickdeoliveiraleal (2022-04-13 23:22:33+00:00): De onde tirou esse nome? DF-445 (SUL) e NORTE? Até onde sei é só DF-445
ProjetoMapeia (2022-04-14 12:23:55+00:00): Os nomes foram tirados das placas de sinalização das vias.
kapazao (2022-04-16 08:30:57+00:00): Hola, por favor indica correctamente el comentario en los conjunto de cambios. Indicas en varios "rio segura" y no tienen nada que ver las ediciones con el Río Segura. Puedes indicar simplemente que has corregido caminos y algunos elementos alrededor de dicho río.
Un saludo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119682626
inode64 (2022-04-18 18:44:52+00:00): Lo siento tienes razón, no se porque puse tan corta la descripción.
Fuimos a caminar por La Matea y debí de equivocarme
La próxima vez me explicare mejor
un saludo
Sammyhawkrad (2022-04-15 00:21:05+00:00): Hello PopeyePopcord, you're making edits to a lot of street names in Accra including places/street names we have surveyed on the ground.

What data source are you using for these edits?
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 14:56:54+00:00): see https://data.gov.gh/
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
confusedbuffalo (2022-04-16 18:12:21+00:00): Thanks for your edits, try to look out for the "square" option in the right click menu (or press Q) to make the buildings have square corners.
Mordechai23 (2022-04-14 09:25:14+00:00): Hey Alexey, there is a new tagging scheme for paczkomat that was approved via voting earlier this year: 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker

I'd really encourage using it istead of the old, deprecated one ;)
Mordechai23 (2022-04-14 09:26:44+00:00): Oh and there is a section with standard tag sets to copy for popular parcel locker brands in Poland available here which is nice

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:amenity%3Dparcel_locker#Przyk.C5.82ady_tagowania
Alexey Vazhnov (2022-04-14 09:35:34+00:00): Mordechai23, I will do it.
Thank you!
Alexey Vazhnov (2022-04-14 20:35:56+00:00): Done, here and https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/119728687
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-16 15:34:31+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1051652707. What s the meaning of the tag Nadlesnictwo = Goleniów?
ptarac (2022-04-16 16:13:43+00:00): Hello! It's my mistake. There should be  operator=Nadleśnictwo Goleniów (the Goleniów Forest District).
Corrected.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
user_5359 (2022-04-16 15:22:30+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please what is the meaning of the tag on your three new nodes?
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Patr1k_P (2022-05-27 08:30:52+00:00): inak davaj si vacsi pozor, vytvaras dost duplikovanych ciest, to znamena, ze cesta existuje a ty na existujucu nakreslis novu...priklad takych ciest je 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1002250873

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865590263

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/865606527

a je ich viac...niekde su to len take kratke useky...neviem ako sa ti take nieco dari robit, pretoze snad ked ides kreslit, tak snad vidis ci tam uz je cesta alebo nie? No a zistis to tak ze ked vymazes dany usek cesty, tak uvidis ze cesta tam uz bola
ndm (2022-04-13 21:15:28+00:00): Looks like a dragged node on Elderberry Walk -- there's a very sharp angled spike?
ndm (2022-04-13 21:15:44+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/645769516#map=18/51.50809/-2.60190
hooper114 (2022-04-14 15:23:29+00:00): Fixed with #119718090
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:19:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:15:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
benoitdd (2022-04-14 11:03:02+00:00): all data of the school are lost: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/400644469/history
please, revert your changes
trigpoint (2022-07-03 13:23:59+00:00): I have reverted this change
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:23:54+00:00): Please remember to square your building corners! Right click on the line and select the square from the context menu. Thanks!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119684685
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:22:41+00:00): Pretty good tracing, but please remember to square your building corners! Keep on mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119684725
topolusitania (2022-04-19 11:20:40+00:00): Olá
Bem vindo ao OSM. A zona que mapeaste não é uma verdadeira "pradaria". è antes uma "greenfield" - zona urbana ainda não construida.
Não desistas, ninguem nasce ensinado e todos cometemos erros.
Tenta começar a desenhar estradas, ruas e edificios no inicio. 
Não tentes começar logo pelo estuário do Rio tejo, pois é uma zona "complicada" para recem chegados, pelas inumeras zonas e relações que tem.. Há grupos de ajuda em Portugal se tiveres dúvidas. Talk-pt (lista de Correio) OSMPortugal (grupo do Telegram ou por mensagens privadas a qualquer mapeador mais experiente. Força e continua ;-)
topolusitania (2022-04-19 11:22:35+00:00): Por ultimo , não "coles os edificios ouáreas às estradas ou ruas. As estradas e ruas são desenhadas no eixo das mesmas e os edificios não começam "no meio " delas.
Cumprimentos
Topolusitania
mjans (2022-06-02 17:40:35+00:00): Ik denk dat hier iets mis is gelopen ;-)
Enock4seth (2022-04-15 11:53:54+00:00): Hello, 

How did you come up with all these streets in a flash?
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 14:53:17+00:00): i added them from an out of print map
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:22:04+00:00): Thanks for mapping, but please make sure to trace the building footprint by placing a point at each corner, rather than roughing it in. Keep it up!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119684765
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:20:56+00:00): Thanks for mapping! Remember: roads, including driveways such as this one, should be connected to the road network. Keep mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119684811
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:18:49+00:00): Pretty good mapping, given the grainy imagery. But please remember to square your building corners. Keep mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119684822
SekeRob (2022-04-14 12:36:06+00:00): If only people not in Santa Cruz or a Swedish badlands corner could understand why these 10,000 miles apart paving tags had to be added in 1 change set, certainly I don't for the life of it. StreetComplete is for local surveying, on the spot, NOT for satellite skipping the globe to do something at back home or the holiday trip one took here or there. The tool is utterly unsuitable for this operation and this will linger top of the local history list of 1000s of local mappers pushing off the edits of their area of interest.

Pretty please, don't do this. Use ID Editor or Josm or the many other OSM tools that allow saving on a local basis. StreetComplete does not ,regardless if you upload automatically or force uploads per visit. Sessions are held open for hours.

MTIA for your consideration on your future mapping discoveries.

Greetings from Italy.
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-19 10:16:24+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2805665
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:17:37+00:00): A couple tips: 1) Make sure you put points on the corners of the building, and 2) square the building after tagging. Thanks for mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119684851
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:15:59+00:00): This is a well traced building. Nice square corners, too. Thanks for mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119684867
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:14:46+00:00): Thanks for mapping in St Lucia! Buildings look nice & square.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119684948
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:10:54+00:00): Thanks for mapping in St Lucia! Good work here. Accurate tracing of the building footprint and nice, square corners! Keep at it!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119684986
ndm (2022-04-13 21:14:15+00:00): What's the copyright on these S. Glos. council documents -- are you really allowed to copy from them?
hooper114 (2022-04-14 15:18:16+00:00): Yes! I have simply used the documents to verify the name of the road which is also available from other sources, not make a copy of the documents. A street name is a fact, not a creative work, and thus is not sufficiently substantive to be covered by copyright law. I understand your vigilance but I think you overestimate the extent of IP legislation.
ndm (2022-04-14 18:52:57+00:00): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_street
hooper114 (2022-04-15 16:02:52+00:00): OMG really? First you assume I don't know about trap streets. I do. Next, do you really think the council is going to care about mapping data? Finally you can't be bothered to actually communicate.... just copy-paste a URL and move on.... Good job. Nvmd ndm - I was getting bored of OSM anyway. Bye!
ndm (2022-04-15 20:44:09+00:00): Changeset comments aren't great for potentially lengthy replies.

I'm sorry you were upset by me posting a Wikipedia link.

I'll do a foot survey in the near future.
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:09:46+00:00): Thanks for mapping in St Lucia! Your tracing looks mostly good, but please remember to square your building corners. And please keep mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119685155
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:07:33+00:00): Thanks for mapping in St Lucia! Your tracing looks mostly accurate, but please remember to square your buildings!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119685159
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:24:07+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:42+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:23:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
ivanbranco (2023-10-16 10:51:27+00:00): Hi SekeRob,

where did you read that shop=windows is deprecated? The Wiki page doesn't mention it. Also shop=windows has 133 uses, shop=window_construction only 28. Maybe you get confused between shop and craft? In that case can we restore the previous shop value?
SekeRob (2023-10-16 13:14:21+00:00): 1 year later ....  possible some silly reflex to an Osmose moan. There's lots of infissi here who construct windows (and doors) su misura. I'm fine with windows put back to what I put there originally.
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:05:40+00:00): Generally good tracing, but one of your buildings needs to be squared up. Keep on mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119685518
AndriesWijma (2022-04-15 01:37:53+00:00): Bedankt voor het corrigeren van mijn slordigheidje!
E de Wit (2022-04-15 16:32:22+00:00): Kleine moeite :)

De uitleg bij de plaatsen ziet er trouwens goed uit!
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:04:58+00:00): Good work here. Nicely squared, faithfully matches what is on the ground. Keep on mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119685611
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:03:59+00:00): Please remember to square your buildings by right clicking on the line and selecting the 'square' icon from the context menu. Keep on mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119685647
sejohnson (2022-04-26 00:01:30+00:00): Thanks for mapping in St Lucia! Tracing looks good, but please make sure to square the building. Keep on mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119685666
sejohnson (2022-04-25 23:59:56+00:00): Thanks for mapping in St Lucia! A couple hints: Make sure to 1) place each point on the corner of the building, and 2) square your building. Keep on mapping!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119685679
MxxCon (2022-04-15 02:30:39+00:00): Perhaps this tag would be more appropriate? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dschoolyard 👍
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/119685714
Spaghetti Monster🍝 (2022-04-19 08:55:39+00:00): If you come across duplicates you can delete one.
Enock4seth (2022-04-15 11:56:32+00:00): Hi,

Where did you copy all these beautiful street names from? You seem to blindly and illegally copying from copyrighted sources. 

Kindly respond.
PopeyePopcord (2022-04-15 14:54:21+00:00): no i didn't, i copied them from Ghana Open Data Initiative
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:14:17+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
eggie (2022-04-14 07:41:18+00:00): Dag Issa.. Je vraagt feedback.
Lijkt me allemaal oke. Tip.. 
Je zou eens kunnen kijken naar editor JOSM Dan kun je de transparant van de BGT omtrekgericht op de achtergrond zetten en zie je precies hoe de wegen lopen.
editor josm stap voor stap 

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=53710        

 

BGT implementeren  

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=59021 

MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-04-14 07:46:54+00:00): Hoi.. Je vraagt feedback.. Lijkt me oke.. 
'k heb gelijk die prominente P's op nodes aangepast naar parking=street_side op vlakken. 
Dan zijn ze wat minder prominent aanwezig. 
Gr eggie
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:16:18+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
mvexel (2022-04-13 23:46:47+00:00): I go to Liberty Park multiple times a week and have added many things to OSM there, but never thought to add this island :) Thanks!
mariotomo (2022-04-14 15:31:47+00:00): hi. if this is a bus stop, it might be better to tag it as highway=bus_stop; public_transport=platform; shelter=yes. still if it is a bus stop, it might have a name.

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dbus_stop
mariotomo (2022-04-14 15:25:10+00:00): hola. I sort of know the area, and are you mapping new elements? you should complete them with the required 'information=*' field, otherwise we still don't know what to expect. is it a "guidepost" or "board"?

please do check the pages https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=information
and 
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/information#values
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:20:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
legofahrrad (2022-04-15 16:33:22+00:00): Hallo,

bitte beachte, dass das Feld für den Eigennamen wirklich nur für Namen gedacht ist. Dort gehören keine Beschreibungen oder Hausnummern hin. Für Hausnummern gibt es "addr:housenumber". Die von dir bearbeiteten Häuser haben auch alle eine Hausnummer bekommen, daher sollte kein Name mehr mit gleichem Wert vergeben werden.

Lies dir doch mal bitte einige Wiki-Artikel für den Anfang durch:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_practice

Beste Grüße :-)
legofahrrad (2022-04-15 16:37:03+00:00): Hallo!
Dank deines Änderungssatz-Kommentars weiß ich leider nicht, was du hier geändert hast. Bitte gib beim nächsten Mal richtig an, was du geändert hast.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Viele Grüße!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-04-15 18:13:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 119755674 where the changeset comment is: Following numerous complaints to the DWG, reverting some data believed not to be licence-compatible. Meaningful communication with the mapper failed. See https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/5913 and previous blocks.
Herman Lee (2022-04-14 07:41:56+00:00): 建议您使用更简洁、更清楚、更能让其他绘图者能够抓取到编辑集信息的描述方法来解释您的编辑集，谢谢！
HolloWorld (2022-04-14 16:55:10+00:00): 就你的要求已把鐵路少女除牌。