piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
abakus_uploader (2021-01-07 23:31:28+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
aixbrick (2021-02-18 14:29:12+00:00): Hallo,
änderst du das denn auch wieder zurück?
Gruß
user_5359 (2021-01-08 18:37:07+00:00): Hello! What is the meaning vom ImgDate? Why you didn't use source:date in combination with source=... ?
user_5359 (2021-01-07 16:19:20+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I have delete your SEO SPAM (you are not a church). If this is an error, you can report it here, then we will be happy to help restore the data.
Self-Perfection (2024-01-28 22:29:08+00:00): Hello! What is the logic of changing this way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370626233 from bridge to the embankment in this changeset? Embankment does not look appropriate: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:embankment
PedroMTG13 (2024-01-28 22:36:47+00:00): Hi.
It is a high platform of concrete, about 1meter from the soil (or rock) around it. It is not a bridge as is not supported by pillars.
And also a enbarkment because it is also a construction heavy on ground moviments.
UT93 (2021-01-07 17:04:51+00:00): Die in diesem Änderungssatz von dir geänderten / hinzugefügten Attribute "beissen" sich erneut. "access=yes" bezieht sich auf sämtliche Verkehrsteilnehmer, dann passt es irgendwie nicht, diverse Benutzergruppen mit "no" zu belegen. Ich empfehle hier, das Atrtribut "access=yes" komplett zu entfernen.
UT93 (2021-01-07 17:20:02+00:00): Auch die in diesem Änderungssatz von dir geänderten / hinzugefügten Attribute "beissen" sich erneut. "access=yes" bezieht sich auf sämtliche Verkehrsteilnehmer, dann passt es irgendwie nicht, diverse Benutzergruppen mit "no" zu belegen. Ich empfehle hier, das Atrtribut "access=yes" komplett zu entfernen.
Amegaz (2021-01-11 22:45:51+00:00): Hi Chriss,
please reduce the area of your change. This change goes across several countries and I think it does only concern one street.
Best regards
Amegaz
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97109261
ChrissW-R1 (2025-01-02 03:38:14+00:00): Hi Amegaz,

thanks for your vision.
I changed my workflows to split those changes in sets which are group by cities or regions, but in any case by countries.

Best regards
Chriss
PT-53 (2021-01-07 12:39:20+00:00): Test Mail-Nachricht über CS-Kommentar
Jiver (2021-01-07 12:42:22+00:00): Bitte rückgänig machen...
trigpoint (2021-10-20 23:02:43+00:00): I think the name slipped a bit, have fixed it.

Cheers Phil
Dodko (2021-02-21 00:12:01+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893029905
Neviem či je dobré dávať do názvu cesty opis kam cesta vedie.
aceman444 (2021-04-12 18:58:57+00:00): Hi, the source https://kramerius-vs.techlib.cz/view/uuid:74b5a420-c8f5-11e2-8b8b-0800200c9a66?page=uuid:a3f10f88-eee2-11e2-8bc6-001b63bd97ba&fulltext=marchegg
 seems to not be accessible anymore. Also please provide evidence you are allowed to use it as source for data into OSM (a link to the licence or similar). It also appears the names of the roads are written wrongly (with typos) so it is another reason to check the sources. Thanks
aceman444 (2021-04-26 00:50:30+00:00): Zohorer Canal ani nevyzera byt spravne po nemecky. Aky je teda zdroj k tymto zmenam?
Andrea Musuruane (2021-01-08 09:10:08+00:00): Ciao. Le immagini Bing non sono ben allineate in Piemonte. Meglio usare Esri Clarity. Ciao, Andrea
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97111324
Cascafico (2021-01-08 09:34:42+00:00): Avevo provato aggiustando sulle poche traccie GPS, ma infatti non erano tutte coerenti.
Grazie!
Grupa Netia (2021-01-08 12:25:38+00:00): To jest Wrocławskie lokalne autoryzowanego przedstawiciela Netii
zorglubu (2021-01-08 14:33:16+00:00): Bonjour,

Il y a déjà une poste deux maisons plus au nord. L'une des deux n'est-elle pas en trop ?
Merci.
Laurent Goubert (2021-01-08 15:59:57+00:00): Bonjour, 
Merci pour ce signalement, la poste est effectivement au nord, je déplace donc le distributeur de billets.
bonne soirée
di4tu2 (2021-05-15 14:41:10+00:00): There are still several ways within this estate which have either public or permissive access.  Is this correct?  The inconsistent use of "permit" makes calculating some routes in and out rather awkward.  I'd have thought a permit is either required or it isn't
9_tab (2026-02-18 11:14:41+00:00): voir https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/street-rename-repair-request/141625
eggie (2021-01-07 14:17:23+00:00): Beste Rubku... Svp geen bedrijfsinfo en of adressen  op gebouwen toevoegen.
Gebruik de adresnode.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2021-01-07 14:19:30+00:00): Info samengevoegd met adresnode.
Adres verwijderd
ndm (2021-01-08 19:40:21+00:00): The public footpath is not permissive -- this changeset should be reverted -- see https://www.rowmaps.com/showmap.php?place=51.4417%2C-2.7101&map=OS&lat=51.441700&lon=2.7101&lonew=W
ndm (2021-01-08 19:43:08+00:00): Putting bicycle=no means that even National Trust members aren't allowed to cycle to Tyntesfield -- which seems very strange and eco-unfriendly.
Tyntesfield (2021-01-11 08:44:19+00:00): This path goes through estate grounds, where there is a no cycling rule to protect the conservation of the area. Visitors are welcome to approach by cycle on the main road or via the NCN Festival way.
trigpoint (2021-01-11 08:46:58+00:00): However a PROW should be tagged as foot=yes, it is not permissive as it is a legal right of way.
DaveF (2021-10-14 00:36:06+00:00): Hi
You've added duplicate, overlaid golf features in Tewkesbury. Could you take a look & delete duplicates?

Click on a marker for an example:

http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/#zoom=15&lat=51.97926&lon=-2.16723&item=1230&level=1
Martin Wiggins (2021-10-14 05:15:56+00:00): It looks like all the duplicates are bunkers inside of the marked fairways which is accurate.
DaveF (2021-10-14 10:33:02+00:00): No it's not. Unsure why you'd make such a claim.
Please remove duplicates.
Martin Wiggins (2021-10-14 14:17:17+00:00): What's not? I clicked on duplicates and it highlighted all the bunkers on the fairways. So that's why I stated that. Not sure why you are being rude to be honest.

What are the other duplicates?

Have you a big interest in Tewkesbury Park Golf?
DaveF (2021-10-14 15:20:14+00:00): I have a "big interest" in ensuring the quality of the OSM database.

Two bunkers, same tags, same location, overlaid, not the same id:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893097826
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893038684

Could you please remove your duplicating data.
Martin Wiggins (2021-10-14 15:23:10+00:00): Is that the only thing? Your link went to a big list of all sorts of things hence me clicking on the only one with duplicate in the title.

So is it just that one bunker?
DaveF (2021-10-14 15:39:14+00:00): No, there's conflicting items at each of the each of the markers in the OSMOSE link I sent.

Plus you've mapped this both as a driving range & a fairway:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893038683
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893097825

Also check the buildings
Martin Wiggins (2021-10-14 18:11:28+00:00): I've used streetmap to import into golf simulator software to create TP as a playable course in the simulator software.

I'd rather leave it as it is to be honest. 

None of the things you are raising imapct the usefulness of the map and removing them would impact importing the golf course at a later date.

Thanks
DaveF (2021-10-14 21:41:35+00:00): OK. This is *NOT* how OSM works. 
The database is implemented to a certain standard.
One of the accepted rules:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

All data users have to abide by the standards & work to them.
If there's a problem with *their* software then you need to contract them.
Please correct your errors.
user_2066394 (2021-01-07 21:49:04+00:00): Wie kommst du da auf shop=supermarket ?

Hofladen (shop=farm) und Selbstbedienungsladen (amenity=vending_machine) sind bereits korrekt erfasst.
hmkaiser (2021-01-08 07:26:33+00:00): Guten Morgen, sorry, da habe ich vielleicht nicht richtig nachgedacht. Das Gebäude selbst war nur mit "building=yes" getaggt. Ich hätte in jedem Fall statt "supermarket", "farm" eintragen müssen.
hmkaiser (2021-01-08 08:02:08+00:00): Ich würde alle Attribute aus dem Punkt "Biohof Hirschvogel" auf die Gebäudefläche übertragen und den Punkt selbst löschen. Die "vending_machine"  kann man belassen, obwohl die "amenity" im Gebäude verschwindet.
user_2066394 (2021-01-08 09:36:27+00:00): Ich würde vorschlagen, dass hier in meinem Heimatgebiet alles passt und externe Mitarbeit akut nicht benötigt wird. Danke.
pitscheplatsch (2021-01-14 12:31:44+00:00): Hallo U__Bolt, danke für die Änderung.

Liegt jetzt aber bei dem folgenden Teilstück nicht eine doppelte Information vor? 
maxspeed und maxspeed:forward

Siehe https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/303574061

Danke & Viele Grüße
gscholz (2021-01-17 07:36:53+00:00): Hi Belo Horizonte-RMBH,
your recent changesets have added a lot of errors to the OSM database regarding overlapping ways (blue markers):

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.20291&lat=-19.07629&zoom=10&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
dcapillae (2021-01-07 15:28:45+00:00): Buenas tardes, Mor. Gracias por los cambios.

Por favor, segrega los cambios por localización o por tipo de corrección. Los conjuntos de cambios demasiado grandes, que ocupan un territorio demasiado extenso o que tocan características demasiado diversas son difíciles de revisar. En la página de buenas prácticas de la comunidad española tienes algunas recomendaciones al respecto: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Espa%C3%B1a/Buenas_pr%C3%A1cticas#Changesets_o_conjunto_de_cambios

Gracias por tu colaboración.

Atentamente,

Daniel
marc__marc (2021-04-01 12:34:20+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/8300102497
c'est quoi ?
Cordialement,
Marc
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:51+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:58+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:39+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:59+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:38:52+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:37:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
blackboxlogic (2021-01-09 03:33:03+00:00): Welcome to OSM and thank you for your much-needed improvements to Denmark roads. Please ask if you have any questions.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/97114518
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:36:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:41:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
nlme (2021-01-07 15:02:28+00:00): Hi there, is there a reason you've deleted the concrete wall I added to this area which is very much still physically there?
Turini2 (2021-01-07 15:45:31+00:00): my mistake! I may have got my streets mixed up - was in the area today checking what's changed!
nlme (2021-01-07 15:49:52+00:00): No worries (nice to see a neighbour!) - I'll survey the rest of the fence around that area later on.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:40:43+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:42:38+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
Patchanka (2021-01-07 15:42:26+00:00): bonjour
je vois que vous avez ajouté pas mal de double-sens cyclables sur Bayonne. Est-ce simplement une déduction par rapport au fait que soit en zone 30 ? Ou bien avez-vous été sur le terrain ?
Concernant la rue de Malledaille, j'y suis passée il y a peu de temps et je vous confirme la présence d'un panneau "Zone de rencontre" au niveau du début de la rue (entre le restaurant et l'église). C'est pourquoi elle était tagguée en highway=living_street (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:highway%3Dliving_street). Du coup la limitation de vitesse est de 20 km/h (implicite car c'est forcément 20 dans une zone de rencontre). Le double-sens est effectivement autorisé pour les vélos.
Simon Vuillemin (2021-01-15 10:35:04+00:00): Bonjour, je me suis appuyé sur la plateforme opendata de Bayonne qui l'indiquait à nouveau passée en zone 30 après une zone de rencontre. Je fais la modification inverse dans ce cas :) 
Belle journée
Milancer (2021-01-08 10:13:06+00:00): Ahoj, asi ti utekla kopie linie staré trati přes Strašnice. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893059102
Můžeš na to prosím kouknout?
Díky.
Piskvor (2021-01-08 10:18:41+00:00): Wtf, podívám se na to. Obvykle na to JOSM upozorňuje.

Díky za upozornění.
Piskvor (2021-01-08 15:00:53+00:00): Smazáno v https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97177100
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-03-01 18:39:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changesets 117961003, 117970393, 117965218, 117980733 where the changeset comment is: Following a complaint about invalid edits, and a lack of decent reply (see https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=414659 , https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Max_Kritic/blocks ) reverting changesets where _only_ osmose was used.
user_2066394 (2021-01-07 22:07:07+00:00): Sind noch weitere Gebäude betroffen?
Borstellino (2021-01-08 09:47:25+00:00): Sichere Informationen habe ich leider nur für dieses Gebäude (http://www.klinikum.uni-muenchen.de/Friedrich-Baur-Institut/de/institut/anfahrt/campus_grosshadern/index.html). Die Pathologie (ehemals Marchioninistr. 27) ist jetzt die Marchioninistr. 68 (https://www.pathologie.med.uni-muenchen.de/085kontakt/020campus_gh/index.html), aber ich bin nicht sicher, ob es korrekt ist, das ganze Gebäude zu ändern.
user_2066394 (2021-01-08 10:45:08+00:00): Ok, das braucht dann besser nochmal eine Begehung vor Ort.
BCNorwich (2021-01-09 14:41:37+00:00): Hi, you joined highways to a mapped underground cable in several places. I've removed these joins.

Regards Bernard.
mariotomo (2021-01-07 16:36:06+00:00): hola.  sabes que hay varios otros maperos en Panamá?  tenemos un grupo Telegram, obviamente hay páginas en el wiki de OSM dedicadas a Panamá, y nos apoyamos al foro #61 y a la lista talk-latam:
https://t.me/Comunidad_OSM_Panama
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/ES:Panam%C3%A1
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=61
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-latam/
trigpoint (2021-01-08 15:51:45+00:00): Bore da
I think your name:gl on https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/653563534 is a typo.

Diolch Phil
AdVerburg (2021-01-08 16:42:07+00:00): Hi Phil,
changed to name:cy
Cheers Ad.
trigpoint (2021-01-08 16:46:25+00:00): Thank you
pio2_122 (2021-01-07 15:18:31+00:00): Hej,
Przeglądając ten zestaw zmian zauważyłem, że w miejscowości Wilkowa Wieś zmieniła się trochę adresacja. Zaimportowałeś nowe adresy, jednak stare zostały na miejscu: np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2094227018

W wolnej chwili postaram się uaktualnić adresację w tej gminie i wyłapać nieistniejące adresy. W zasadzie mój komentarz można potraktować więc tylko informacyjnie :)
Cristoffs (2021-01-07 15:34:57+00:00): Super. Staram się wywalać stare jak zauważę. Czyli tu już zostawiam.
pio2_122 (2021-01-07 16:03:11+00:00): Będziesz jeszcze weryfikował budynki z tych importów?
Pytam, ponieważ z ciekawości pobrałem ten zestaw zmian i znalazłem trochę nieistniejących już budynków, np. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893066980
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893066571
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/893066912
grelus (2021-01-07 16:25:31+00:00): faktycznie zdarzają się, choć z linkiem nr.1 to nie ma pewności. W tym miejscu nie było budynku co najmniej od 10 lat więc może to jest coś nowego? Import sprawdzam głównie pod względem zdublowanych, i znacząco odbiegających budynków. Czasem coś umknie. Będę patrzył uważniej
pio2_122 (2021-01-07 17:04:30+00:00): Dzięki za szybką odpowiedź :)
Odnośnie 1. linku - Raczej nie jest to coś nowego, ponieważ dane BDOT10k w tym miejscu pochodzą z 2013 r., natomiast ortofoto z 2017 r. O dziwo, ten budynek nadal jest widoczny także w danych EGiB z powiatu, które powinny być najbardziej aktualne... Chyba ktoś nie odnotował, że budynku już nie ma :P

Niestety, w miejscach gdzie BDOT10k jest dosyć stary automatycznie jest więcej nieaktualnych obrysów. Nic więc dziwnego, że może coś umknąć.
Na szczęście, do tych relatywnie nowych „edycji” nie mogę się zbytnio przyczepić :) Są tam nawet obrysy (ale rysowane „na oko” - ze względu na brak innych danych) budynków, które w czasie tworzenia tego zbioru były dopiero w budowie.

Jeszcze odnośnie aktualności danych: można to sprawdzić w sekcji „Skorowidze” na stronie https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/
Cristoffs (2021-01-07 18:52:28+00:00): Zwracajcie uwagę na rodzaj budynków kat. dotycząca farm_auxiliary jest najbardziej śliska tam znalazłem najwięcej nieistniejących. Wygląda na to, że tego nikt za bardzo nie pilnuje.
BCNorwich (2021-01-09 14:31:04+00:00): Hi, Cycleway Way: 92447558 and footpath Way: 92447543 look like they are a single highway (a segregated but combined footway/cycleway) rather than two separated highways as you've mapped. Please see here:- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:segregated

Regards Bernard.
BCNorwich (2021-01-09 14:34:10+00:00): I've removed 3 duplicated section of highway.
Cristoffs (2021-01-07 18:53:46+00:00): Przybliżysz co oznacza opis zmiany?
!bm (2021-01-07 16:14:35+00:00): Hallo Maximilian Lienig,

ein Blick ins Wiki kann nie schaden und mitunter vor so manch unnötigem Fehler bewahren. Die deutsche Version des ersten Links leitet sogar auf deren zweiten weiter:

- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:disused:
- https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

revertiert in: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/97119993

--besteGrüße!bm
Kovoschiz (2021-03-29 18:11:46+00:00): You accidentally added `bridge=yes` to a `tunnel=yes` section.
literan (2021-01-08 14:31:06+00:00): не надо выдумывать, нет там пешеходных улиц. Сменил тег на дорожки (highway=footway)
sgmamz (2021-01-07 15:22:23+00:00): Hi,

These edits were made using FACEBOOK missing road detections. #MapWithAI

Regards,
Sgmamz.
Reza Babri (2021-01-09 09:21:15+00:00): سلام آقا محسن
این تگ
natural=cliff
 برای دیواره ها استفاده میشه و تاج دیواره بصورت خط ثبت میشه و بصورت سطح متداول نیست. اگر اینجا یک منطقه صخره ایه و دیواره نیست، نباید با این تگ ثبت بشه. میتونید از تگ 
natural=bare_rock
استفاده کنید و محدوده صخره ها رو تعیین کنید به شرط اینکه پوشش منطقه، صخره خالص باشه و پوشش گیاهی نداشته باشه.