piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-08-24 12:09:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125313032 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some dubious changes in the USA - see https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6182
SomeoneElse (2022-08-24 12:13:03+00:00): Sorry - https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6282
pitscheplatsch (2022-08-25 19:07:00+00:00): #Failed

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
pitscheplatsch (2022-08-25 19:06:58+00:00): #Failed

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
kartler175 (2022-09-10 08:59:12+00:00): When do you plan to fix/finish?
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.29293&lat=46.58528&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.95&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
Swiss94 (2022-09-10 09:05:51+00:00): Next days or maybe one or two weeks - took longer than i thought and at the moment i have not that much time. Will do my best to make it fast.
riiga (2022-08-23 20:40:35+00:00): Hej!

Tack för dina tidigare redigeringar där du har lagt till rätt underlag på vägar, men varför har du helt plötsligt höjt klassningen på vägen från "unclassified" till "secondary"?
Hojen750 (2022-08-24 05:56:22+00:00): Okunskap av en nybörjare. Tack för återkopplingen.
silversurfer83 (2022-08-25 07:03:22+00:00): Hallo Maximilian,

Ich habe ein paar Anmerkungen zu dieser Änderung:
- Du hast in diesem Änderungssatz viel gelöscht, jedoch steht in deinem Kommentar nur "Anpassungen...". In diesem Fall wäre es angebracht ein bisschen genauer zu sagen, was und warum du es gemacht hast, damit andere Mapper deine Änderungen besser nachvollziehen können. Dafür gibt es das Kommentarfeld und darunter die Möglichkeit der Quellenangabe
(siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments)
- dieser Änderungssatz erstreckt sich von Saarbrücken bis Bremen und lässt sich mit den üblichen Qualitätssicherungswerkzeugen schlecht begutachten. Achte bitte in Zukunft darauf deine Änderungen bitte möglichst lokal zusammenhängend zu halten und wenn du zB vom Saarland nach Bremen wechselst, einfach vorher die Änderung speichern (und kommentieren), bevor du weitermachst.
(siehe hier: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets)

- grundsätzlich gilt: Wenn Du dir nicht sicher bist, guck erstmal ins Wiki und dann frag ruhig in einer der vielen aktiven Chatgruppen nach
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contact_channels#Chats.2Fmessengers)

Weiter viel Spaß
silversurfer83
silversurfer83 (2022-08-26 15:05:18+00:00): Da es einfach sehr aufwändig ist, alle gelöschten Dinge händisch zu kontrollieren, hier nochmal meine Frage: Worauf basieren deine Änderungen?
MaximilianRoth (2022-08-26 15:17:48+00:00): Zunächst mal danke für deine Nachrichten. Ich habe mir jetzt alles erneut angesehen. Soweit ich es erkennen kann erstrecken sich die Änderungen nur deshalb auf Bremen, weil eine Straßenrelation (B51) bearbeitet wurde. In Bremen wollte ich jedoch keinerlei Änderung vornehmen. Alle anderen Änderungen sind in Rilchingen-Hanweiler zu verorten, wo ich wohne und mich daher vor Ort gut auskenne.
Ich kann aktuell aber nicht erkennen, dass durch meine Änderungen ein Fehler in der Karte ist.
silversurfer83 (2022-08-26 16:41:42+00:00): Danke für deine Antwort :)
Das mit den Relationen ist immer so eine Sache 😄
Um es anderen einfacher zu machen wäre es hilfreich, wenn du auch das "Quellen" -Feld unterhalb des Kommentarfeldes nutzt, bevor du deine Änderung speicherst. Klassiker wäre local knowledge oder survey wenn du vor Ort geguckt hast.
Kann also vollkommen in Ordnung sein, dass du einige Objekte gelöscht hast.
Wenn andere (insbesondere recht neue Nutzer) Objekte löschen mache ich sie immer mit diesem Wiki Artikel vertraut: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Lifecycle_prefix

Alles Gute
Silversurfer83
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:16+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:05+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SzymonH (2022-08-23 18:23:25+00:00): Kolejna odsłona wandala. Proszę o wycofanie tej edycji!
NieWnen (2022-08-23 18:30:45+00:00): Wycofane(125284426)
woodpeck (2022-08-23 21:41:13+00:00): Please note that this vandalism changeset was created not by the long-time OSM user "archie" but by someone trying to tarnish their reputation by impersonating him with UTF-8 trickery. The variant of "archie" that has performed the vandalism has been blocked.
rarad74 (2022-08-25 07:10:07+00:00): Salut. Nu se pun pe POI-urile de car rental sau car sales si tag-ul de cladire deoarece iti coloreaza ca amprenta de cladire toata zona si nu se mai disting cladirile reale de acolo. Pentru vanzari auto second hand se pune acelasi tag - car rental pe care il gasesti la cautare in ID editor. Daca din greseala ai pus si building yes pe zona sterge tag-ul ca sa se poata vedea restul cladirilor.
miahi (2022-08-25 07:30:49+00:00): Salut. Mulțumesc de corecție, o să țin cont la următoarele.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:37+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
limes11 (2022-08-30 19:57:52+00:00): Hi, 

du hast einen Wochentag "Wo" erfasst - Das soll wohl "Mo" heißen? Oder ist Montag zu?

VG
LightSpirit (2022-09-01 22:00:15+00:00): Ja, du hast recht, Flüchtigkeitsfehler. Habe es korrigiert. Dir fällt auch alles auf.

Gruß
Oliver (LightSpirit)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:15+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:57+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
kepivar (2022-08-23 18:23:50+00:00): If the well pads have 90 ° angles you shall straighten them by pressing "Q".
martien-176 (2022-08-24 09:41:21+00:00): Reverted changeset 125272730
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125284197
martien-176 (2022-08-24 10:17:52+00:00): Reason for reversion: too many unjustified deleted objects
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
emersonveenstra (2022-08-23 18:48:17+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your contribution. You can make it better by changing it to the "Car Wash" feature type, then you can add more specific tags to it. That will allow data consumers to understand what it is.
ezekielf (2022-11-06 22:42:12+00:00): Hey Nigel,  Thanks for updating the AT/LT here with the new alignment.  It looks like another mapper made some changes after you and now there are two parallel paths labeled as the AT.   https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126845646
I'd like to get this cleaned up if you can share your on the ground knowledge.

Looks like this section is the new alignment?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088536733  

And what is the state of the old alignment?  Closed, but tread still visible on the ground, or restored to natural looking state?
VictorIE (2022-08-25 06:41:27+00:00): Hi, 

Duplicate road: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088537197
Osmwithspace (2023-08-03 10:34:21+00:00): Is https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9972977392 amenity=fast_food?
starsep (2023-08-03 10:38:14+00:00): Yes. Thanks! I fixed it
emersonveenstra (2022-08-23 18:45:44+00:00): Hi,

Thank you for your contribution! Please note a couple of things, first, phone numbers need to be either +1-555-555-5555 or +1 555 555 5555 format, and facebook links should be put in a `contact:facebook` tag, not the `website` tag. Thanks!
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:03+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:04+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
NieWnen (2022-08-23 18:51:30+00:00): Fikcja...Wycofane(125285201)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:48:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Frans S (2022-08-26 10:08:08+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125285181
Frans S (2022-08-26 10:10:25+00:00): Thanks for your contribution to this project. 
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
I am sorry to say, but  your mappings are not that accurate and in according to the HOT/ OSM quality standards.
Please pay attention to these points:
A: Sorry to say, but your mappings are rather sloppy and not squared. Please pay more attention to follow the outlines of a building (with extensions).



Explanation can be found on this document what  might be helpful to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit


Best regards and keep mapping !
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125285181
Luzandro (2022-08-27 14:47:45+00:00): This changeset has been reverted by changeset 125445436: way still exists, see https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=48.037683&lng=16.420668&z=17&pKey=629578315205902&focus=photo
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:08+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:41+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
pitscheplatsch (2022-08-25 19:06:28+00:00): #Failed

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:23+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:53+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:47+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
pitscheplatsch (2022-08-25 19:06:38+00:00): #Failed

---
Detected by #SuspiciousOpenStreetMap
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious
rempshaener (2022-08-25 17:15:42+00:00): Hallo,
willkommen bei OpenStreetMap.
Ich habe einige deiner Anpassungen überarbeitet:
Parkplätze: Ich habe den „operator“ auf Stadt Neuss geändert, da die Feuerwehr keine rechtsfähige Körperschaft ist.
Ich habe den Zusatz LZ 12 wieder entfernt. Zum einen ist das bereits als „ref“ erfasst – das reicht, um es z.B. bei http://www.openfiremap.de erscheinen zu lassen. Zum anderen sind alle Einheiten der Feuerwehr Neuss (und auch der größte Teil der übrigen Einheiten im RKN) ohne den Zusatz erfasst.
Viele Grüße
riiga (2022-08-23 20:43:16+00:00): Hej!

Du behöver inte fylla in vägnumret som namn också, det räcker med att "ref" har vägnumret. I Openstreetmap är namnet enbart namnet på saker och ting, inte tänkt att användas som en allmän beskrivning eller en upprepning av sånt som redan finns i andra taggar.
Hojen750 (2022-08-24 05:55:04+00:00): Tack för återkopplingen :-)
Allison P (2022-08-24 01:49:05+00:00): "Bldg #" does not belong in the name tag. You should add the tag ref=* and set it to the building number, and delete the name entirely, because it is not a name but just a numerical referrer. Hope this helps.
Fraxi (2024-10-06 12:26:12+00:00): Здравей! 
В момента как стоят нещата с https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11556124279? Според снимките в Mapillary(макар и по-стари), обектът е на Петрол. Фигурира такъв сред изброените в сайта на Петрол, с локация "ж.к. Победа". Обръщам внимание, защото има бележка(https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/4466288). От друга страна има за обслужващата улица таг access=no, но на 23.06. тази година, pau4o е отбелязал наличието на компресор. Бензиностанцията работи, нали?
plamen (2024-10-07 16:50:04+00:00): Да, работи.
Dimitar155 (2024-10-07 19:02:52+00:00): За протокола, въпросния Петрол в ж.к. Победа е друг (https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9349879271). InsaOil са се похвалили във facebook, може би трябваше да го спомена като източник.

https://www.facebook.com/insaoilbulgaria/posts/pfbid02Lxr4ufAXUoCKwRTbFATVxMVpPfHeNj2rJd86PxqjtTCDqf4rS9qurNouN8YWUR2vl
InsertUser (2022-08-24 06:53:31+00:00): This changeset contains two entries for Nicole's beauty supplies in different buildings which is correct?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125286519
Dodko (2022-08-24 06:12:44+00:00): značka
name=Studnička
opisné názvy (cesta, chodník, most, studnička) sa nepoužívajú, tam ide iba skutočný názov studničky ak je pomenovaná
chuckfinley71 (2022-08-23 22:43:15+00:00): Hi there! The apartment complex name does not belong on the name of the road but rather the apartment complex itself (which it looks like you added already 👍). 

Are you sure that Ladera Drive doesn't end there at Belt Line? Looks like that is a service road going into the complex rather than a city street. Is there a street sign that indicates that Ladera continues south of Belt Line?
highflyer74 (2022-08-24 09:18:27+00:00): Hello!

Here https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/140382319/history both "Carretera" and "MEX" are invalid keys. Maybe you can fix this.

Also the naming of the roads leading to the roundabout is inconsistent and includes "?" which is probably not right...
Admasawi (2022-08-25 22:20:36+00:00): Hi highflyer74!

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. In retrospect, the highway names which the “Carretera=*” tags represent are too ambiguous at this junction, so I will leave them unnamed as they were before, but I will revise the “MEX=*” tags to be properly formatted “ref=*” tags.
I will also fix the “AVENIDA TECNOL?GICO” street name, which was done by another mapper previously (for example https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/89049830). I believe it should be Avenida Tecnológico.

Thank you and have a great day!
mcliquid (2022-08-30 06:36:42+00:00): Hallo, du verteilst hier "access=yes" an einer Wohnstrasse. (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/626916822/history)
Das wird bei highway=residential impliziert. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=residential

Bitte schaue dir das Wiki an (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_features) und nutze die zahlreichen Kommunikationsmöglichkeiten mit der Community, bevor du zahlreiche Änderungen machst, die keinen Mehrwert stiften.

Vielen Dank!
mcliquid (2022-09-04 06:43:13+00:00): Hallo, ich würde deine bisherigen Änderungen zurücknehmen, wenn ich keine Antwort von dir bekomme. Leider kann ich keine deiner Änderungen verifizieren.
user_2291551 (2022-09-04 08:53:55+00:00): Dann fahr selber hin und nerv mich nicht dann lösche ich meinen Account wenn du das besser kannst
ma-rt-in (2022-09-04 09:00:36+00:00): Hallo Neitzke,

kein Grund zur Aufregung. Wir möchten nur dir Anregungen geben und dicht nicht nerven.
Deine Änderungen bringen keinen Mehrwert und deshalb machen wir dich darauf aufmerksam.

Also freue dich doch lieber über die konstruktive Kritik.

vg
eggie (2022-08-23 21:14:45+00:00): Dag Knelus...  Je vraagt feedback. 
Lijkt me oke zo.
Groet
eggie
mcliquid (2022-08-30 05:26:54+00:00): Hallo Lukas, ist die B2 zwischen den Fahrspuren mit einer baulichen Trennung versehen? Zumindest lässt sich das aus dem aktuellen Luftbild nicht erkennen.

Und an dieser Stelle müsstest du diesen Way auftrennen und den westlichen Teil zur Einbahnstraße deklarieren: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1088579193

Vielen Dank!
mcliquid (2022-09-18 15:37:10+00:00): Hi, bisher keine Antwort. Ich setze deine Änderung deshalb leider wieder zurück.
mcliquid (2022-09-18 15:40:31+00:00): Reverted mit https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/126335838
mcliquid (2022-08-30 06:32:42+00:00): Du schreibst als Changeset-Kommentar hier "strasse hinzugefügt" hast aber ein Gebäude gelöscht?
user_2066394 (2022-08-23 23:44:15+00:00): Existiert der alte Standort in Emmering -  Untere Au noch?
Helmut Kauer (2022-08-24 20:36:28+00:00): Ja, dort werden die Container gewartet, in Esting die Toilettenkabinen.
user_2066394 (2022-08-24 22:06:51+00:00): Einwandfrei, bin ich wieder auf dem neuesten Stand :-)
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:00+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
yasslay (2022-08-26 21:49:45+00:00): Hello!

Is the name you assigned to the junction at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5809349635 verifiable? While it is the entrance to the HS2 works, I doubt that this is an official name used for the junction, especially considering it is temporary (at least it looks like it)!

Kind regards,
yasslay
Nathan_A_RF (2022-08-26 23:54:35+00:00): This has and will be in place for a number of years to facilitate the works of HS2. It's more a common name than an official name so if you wish to delete it please do.
yasslay (2022-08-27 12:28:22+00:00): Hello!

I have changed the name tag to loc_name as the tagging fits the nature of the works access, as it is likely an unofficial name!

Kind regards,
yasslay
yasslay (2022-08-27 12:28:33+00:00): (https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125440872#map=19/51.61720/-0.52578)
canfe (2022-08-27 05:35:46+00:00): Tolto quello in basso a sinistra i buildings son veramente orribili.
Ti pregherei di renderli ortogonali e più precisi.
Se non hai tempo, sarebbe meglio non mappare così, magari dedicati a cose che richiedono meno precisione come i landuse.
StefanoAimar (2022-08-27 12:21:58+00:00): Il mondo è fatto di persone che cercano di imparare e persone che insegnano. Poi ci sono piccoli uomini che evidenziano solamente gli errori degli altri per sentirsi più grandi. Grazie per il tuo prezioso contributo
canfe (2022-08-27 12:39:54+00:00): Non fare tanto il supponente.
Il lavoro è mal fatto.
Ti chiederei di correggerlo.
Detto così è più semplice?
canfe (2022-08-29 09:54:22+00:00): E invece no: sono io che devo chiederti scusa.
Nella fretta Ho confuso il tuo lavoro con quello pessimo di PaoloChi che però ha smesso (meno male) da un anno di mappare.
Ho provato a correggere un po' di edifici.
Spero tu voglia continuare a mappare.
redd (2022-08-23 20:54:44+00:00): Thanks!
Langlaeufer (2022-08-24 07:50:41+00:00): Hi Sacky,

drive-through ist die Durchfahrt durch einen Drive-In. Hier sind es doch eher grundstrückszufahrten (Driveway) oder ggf. vielleicht Rettungswege (emergency_access). Ich hab es erstmal in Driveway geändert. Können die Wege von einem größeren berechtigten Personenkreis genutzt werden, dann wäre ggf. access=private passend.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125288889
Langlaeufer (2022-08-24 07:51:01+00:00): es erstmal in Driveway geändert

Grüße Frank
und frohes mappen.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125288889
gscholz (2022-08-25 06:50:15+00:00): Hi Paolo,
this changeset has created several errors in the OSM database e.g. regarding self intersecting lines:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.54406&lat=44.58299&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.55&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125289102

This path is also overlapping with a track and not connected to start and finish lines. So it cannot be used by routing software.

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
user_2066394 (2022-08-23 22:24:10+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Shawn Noble (2022-10-15 18:19:02+00:00): Thank you for taking time to contribute to OpenStreetMap, but I question if some of buildings you identified as castles and palaces are in fact able to be identified as such, or that the names used for them are appropriate or correct.
flohoff (2022-08-25 09:08:24+00:00): Moin,
bei so access restrictions ist es immer gut für alle einen note auf den weg zu setzen der die beschilderung beschreibt - Also zeichen 250 + Zusatz "Landwirtschaftlicher Verkehr frei" oder so. 

Access tags sind das mit am meisten erfundene und geratene zeugs und das macht ziemlich viel kaputt.

Flo
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125289845