piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
mk2k22 (2022-09-05 08:40:08+00:00): In fact, more than just a few duplicates...!
tamiel (2022-09-05 12:15:58+00:00): Thanks for the kind notification - indeed a bad mistake. I will be sure to check online before submitting next time.
maraf24 (2023-08-10 19:49:59+00:00): Teren tej szkoły https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/288287539
jest dostępny - są tam boiska i plac zabaw.
martien-176 (2022-09-03 15:12:10+00:00): Hi, i am reviewing the mappings in this project.

Thanks for contributing. Unfortunately there are is an issues here.

You mapped tracks here. However, they are not required in this project. This is detailed in the project instructions.

Humanitarian organizations set the features to be mapped based on their priorities - any time spent mapping other features might slow down the completion of their projects.

Please take this into account in your future mappings.

Thanks and regards,

Martien, HOT Global Validator.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125730694
Stone_X (2022-09-03 19:27:39+00:00): Jest to istniejąca stacja miniaturowej kolejki:
https://ibb.co/Lry10H7
Poniżej przykład gdzie również taką stację oznaczono:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/392821344
więc nie było potrzeby jej usuwania.
mavl (2022-09-04 04:01:53+00:00): Здравствуйте.  
  
    > Это не мост, а просто дорожка для пешеходов вдоль дороги для машин. Нужно поменять теги, по моему мнению."   
  
Пешеходная дорожка проходит по мосту. Тег bridge обозначает не мост, а показывает, что объект находится на мосту. Так что всё правильно с тегами. При желании мост можно обозначить отдельным объектом.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:Key:bridge
Sovushka (2022-09-07 09:48:03+00:00): Понял, спасибо!
Ze0zohk1 (2022-09-03 10:47:00+00:00): sry, hier habe ich vergessen die Quelle rauszunehmen. Ich war *nicht* vor Ort.

Aus meiner Erinnerung weiß ich noch, dass das eine Fortführung des Weges war (da waren weiter Eingänge zur Bars usw.). Ob das wirklich ein footway war, wage ich zu bezweifeln. Damals habe ich mich wahrscheinlich noch nicht getraut, das auf path umzutaggen. Aber, da ich nicht vor Ort war, habe ich es bei footway belassen.
gscholz (2022-09-13 06:49:05+00:00): Hi KwaXoloXolo,
there is still a massive amount of overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=32.09358&lat=-25.73099&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1

Are there any efforts to fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
KwaXoloXolo (2022-09-13 14:20:53+00:00): Hi Guido, I have been fixing the problems - but you are right there are a massive amount of overlapping ways.  I am taking my responsibility seriously, but a I need some time.  Thanks for the nudge.
KwaXoloXolo (2022-09-13 15:04:09+00:00): If you have any tips or tricks to speed up fixing it they will be gratefully received!
gscholz (2022-09-14 05:51:09+00:00): I would use JOSM, download a big area and run the validator on the downloaded data:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Validator

This will point you to every single error. It will still remain a manual work.
Guido
KwaXoloXolo (2022-09-16 08:54:35+00:00): Hi Guido, sorry to trouble you - but how long after I correct an error will it no longer show up in your tool?
gscholz (2022-09-16 09:31:25+00:00): Hi,
the views in the "tool" (OSMI) are updated once a day (at about 00:00 h GMT). So you have to wait one day to see the results of your efforts.
Guido
KwaXoloXolo (2022-09-16 09:34:45+00:00): Brilliant - thank you, and thank you for OSMI - I've been doing daily blocks of corrections and wanted to track progress
pesec (2022-09-05 04:16:04+00:00): Приветствую.
Позвольте не согласиться. 
Данный участок выделен в градостроительном плане как элемент улично-дорожной сети, т.е. улица на нем предполагается, не зависимо от того, какой овраг там сейчас.
Sovushka (2022-09-07 09:47:20+00:00): Здравствуйте. Я ходил в этом районе и могу с уверенностью сказать, что тут вряд ли когда-нибудь будет дорога. Но если в плане есть, то пусть остается, я не против.
pesec (2022-09-07 09:51:19+00:00): Единственно правильным было сменить статус дороги с construction на proposed, т.к. на данный момент строительства не ведется, что я и сделал.
Jrachi (2022-09-03 15:27:48+00:00): Il percorso ha importanza locale e non regionale.
Perché hai cambiato il network da lwn (corretto) a rwn (sbagliato)?
RicoElectrico (2022-09-03 17:21:15+00:00): https://dziennikbaltycki.pl/uratowali-zycie-turystki-uzyli-ogolnodostepnego-defibrylatora-nadmorska-kronika-policyjna-kuznica/ar/c14-16799781

Zastanawiałem gdzie on jest i typowałem to miejsce, choć nie byłem pewien. Natomiast skoro został użyty, to pewnie oddali go do konserwacji?
Marek-M (2022-09-03 20:49:17+00:00): Pudełko AED było na ścianie zamknięte i nie sprawdzałem czy w środku na pewno jest urządzenie. Lokalizacja pudełka została jednak potwierdzona w terenie :)
ruugie (2022-09-10 15:19:26+00:00): highway=primary_link is wrong for such roads
user_5359 (2022-09-05 06:19:31+00:00): Hello! Please have alook on http://www.osm.org/way/1091575755. What is the meaning of the tag Mur = Public?
andrewwiseman (2022-11-09 22:49:11+00:00): Hi, thanks for mapping. It looks like you are making some edits in this area that are not accurate, such as mapping these roads as highway=primary_link when highway=residential, highway=track or highway=path would be more appropriate. See here for more information about mapping roads https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa. Also please check the instructions for the project https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/13305/tasks which goes into detail for which road types to use.

Also it looks like some of these were mapped as highway=primary_link and waterway=drain, but they should only be waterway=drain https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233394068 -- or possibly there should be separate ways if there are roads alongside the drains, and the roads should be highway=path or highway=track , following https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

And you have mapped a lot of these as fences, but I think they should be roads: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/13.69144/-5.81495 

If you have any questions please let me know, or ask the person who organized this project. 

Salut, merci pour la cartographie. Il semble que vous apportiez des modifications dans cette zone qui ne sont pas précises, telles que le mappage de ces routes comme autoroute = lien_principal lorsque autoroute = résidentiel, autoroute = piste ou autoroute = chemin serait plus approprié. Voir ici pour plus d'informations sur la cartographie des routes https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa. Veuillez également consulter les instructions du projet https://tasks.hotosm.org/projects/13305/tasks qui détaillent les types de route à utiliser.

De plus, il semble que certains d'entre eux aient été cartographiés comme highway=primary_link et waterway=drain, mais ils ne devraient être que waterway=drain https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/233394068 - ou peut-être qu'il devrait y avoir des chemins séparés s'il y en a sont des routes le long des drains, et les routes doivent être highway=path ou highway=track , suivant https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Tag_Africa

Et vous en avez cartographié beaucoup comme des clôtures, mais je pense qu'elles devraient être des routes : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/13.69144/-5.81495

Si vous avez des questions, n'hésitez pas à m'en faire part ou à demander à la personne qui a organisé ce projet.
ivanma (2023-09-11 15:43:46+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9997271724
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9997285618

тут две камеры в одном месте или это ошибочно получилось?
somix (2023-09-11 15:57:04+00:00): Две в одном месте
LockOnGuy (2022-09-03 21:44:46+00:00): Hello Mahdi Nameghi,     
Why did you remove the Iraqi border gate? there is a gate and it is clearly shown in areal imagery. Please restore and revert your edit.    
 Also, while editing in Iraq, please use language that Iraqis understand like Arabic or English. In edits like this at the border, English would be preferred for both communities to understand the changeset comment.      
Regards.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-03 21:54:29+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 125754707 where the changeset comment is: revert changeset 125734285 , restore valid tags for the Iraqi border gate barrier=gate and update the access tag access=permit
Mahdi Nameghi (2022-09-04 03:26:27+00:00): Hello
Thanks for your attention.
I should have changed the tag
redd (2022-09-03 13:04:29+00:00): danke!
user_5359 (2022-09-03 12:14:19+00:00): Welcome to OSM! I remove your SEO spam full with foreign keys. Please have a look on https://wiki.osm.org for better keys or ask for help.
mueschel (2022-09-29 10:05:41+00:00): Hi,
could you check this way? It got a strange 'stairca' tag:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091588500
Zaneo (2022-10-02 02:58:00+00:00): Meant to be "staircase" changed to "stairs"
user_5359 (2022-09-04 09:54:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1091589075. what is the meaning of the tag
relations = well
?
maraf24 (2022-11-14 11:34:35+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091589625
Co to landuse=greenfield tutaj oznacza?
tordans (2022-09-23 20:34:23+00:00): FYI für https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=21/52.47070/13.42020 meldet ID jetzt, dass der Weg "outdated tags" hatte und möchte "- cycleway=track" machen. Scheinbar gibt es da ein altes Tagging, das (inoffiziell) deprecated ist?
Supaplex030 (2022-09-24 18:05:01+00:00): iD möchte bestimmt "cycleway:both" statt "cycleway" verwenden, oder? Hier in diesem Fall (geht es um https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844730334?) ist aber eine homonyme Bedeutung gemeint, der keine Seite zugeordnet werden kann (der Radweg _ist_ ein track, er _hat_ aber keine tracks). iD kennt das, wenn überhaupt, vermutlich nur für cycleway=crossing.
tordans (2022-09-24 18:45:58+00:00): Es geht bspw. um https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/907894082 und er will den Tag einfach löschen. Woher das genau kommt, habe ich nicht recherchiert. Könnte die deprecation-Liste sein oder ein Matching über die Presets das dann eine Art Lösch-Liste hat.

Das Tagging Thema an sich ist in der Tag spannend. Für FMC mache ich das gerade so, dass ich alle separat gemappten Radwege wie Track behandel. Aber das klappt auch nur, weil "lane" nur in Edge Cases separat gemapped ist. In diesen Fällen wäre es dann aber falsch…
BCNorwich (2022-09-04 07:58:37+00:00): Hi, This track is almost entirely duplication. You placed the track on top of the existing trunk road Way: 1090600645 and were warned of the problem, (please see above warming). I've deleted the duplication as it disrupts routing.
user_4493657 (2022-09-03 20:45:10+00:00): Wykonana przez ciebie niewłaściwa zmiana kategorii dróg polegająca na błędnym zawyżeniu dróg lokalnych została wycofana. 
Proszę zapoznaj się z zaleceniami dotyczącymi właściwego tagowania obiektów na wiki osm np. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Tag:highway%3Dtertiary W razie problemów, pytań pisz na forum https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23 lub discordzie.
miasteckieprojekty (2022-09-04 21:25:26+00:00): Okej, dziękuję za informację.
rhtb0 (2022-09-03 13:19:06+00:00): Why do you delete and add the normal building again? The building contains a lot of information.
A_Langer (2022-09-03 12:52:36+00:00): Sorry, nicht Zufahrt, sondern Adresse ergänzt
Diógenes de Sinope (2022-09-05 04:33:44+00:00): iD Editor would not let me save the edits that I had made due to a line with no tags (that I presume represents Municipio do Belas, despite there already being an existing line that represents the same), in order to save my edits, I designated the line with the tag 'boundary=administrative'
ivanbranco (2022-09-20 17:28:44+00:00): Ciao kaitu,

c'è un problema con questo commons: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/29210371/history

La sintassi richiede File: o Category: all'inizio e nel caso sia un file l'estensione finale. Riesci a dargli un'occhiata?

Grazie e buon mapping
kaitu (2022-09-20 22:29:32+00:00): Grazie per la segnalazione, ho corretto il tag.
BCNorwich (2022-09-04 07:40:45+00:00): Hi, You've made several long duplicated highways in some previous changesets. I think I've removed or corrected all the problems. Please be careful not to duplicate highways as it disrupts routing.

Regards Bernard.
Langlaeufer (2022-09-04 06:36:34+00:00): falls das Trampelpfade sind, wie wäre es dann mit highway=path und informal=yes?
matipau (2022-09-04 21:21:52+00:00): Der Weg mit surface=woodchips ist vermutlich ein offizieller Weg, weil hier Rindenmulch aufgeschüttet wurde und auch ein paar Mülleimer entlang des Wegs vorhanden sind (die ich noch nicht kartiert habe). Bei den neu eingezeichneten Wegen mit surface=grass handelt es sich um ca. 2 Meter breite Streifen, die in die Wiese gemäht wurden. (Wäre es evtl. sinnvoll, hier est_width=* anzugeben?) Das sind also auch eher bewusst angelegte Wege. Die beiden Wege mit surface=dirt würde ich schon eher als Trampelpfade bezeichnen, hier könnte informal=yes also stimmen. Ganz sicher bin ich mir aber nicht, ob diese Wege nicht vielleicht doch im Rahmen der Discgolf-Anlage so beabsichtigt sind.
Unabhängig von informal=yes wäre aber bei allen hinzugefügten Wegen (und auch bei einigen Wegen, die schon vorher da waren) highway=path tatsächlich passender als highway=footway, da es keine Ausschilderung als Fußweg gibt. Insbesondere wären vermutlich auch Fahrräder erlaubt, obwohl hier die Benutzung der Trampelpfade nicht wirklich sinnvoll ist. Gibt es eigentlich eine Möglichkeit, die Eignung eines Wegs für Fahrräder zu kennzeichnen (bicycle=* beschreibt ja ausschließlich die rechtliche Zugangsbeschränkung)? Oder ist vorgesehen, das nur aus den Werten von surface/smoothness/tracktype abzuleiten?
Langlaeufer (2022-09-04 21:38:32+00:00): Bezügl. der angelegten Wege stimme ich dir zu.
Wenn ein Weg nur zum Gehen geeignet ist, dann kannst du ihn auch als Fußweg taggen. Das mit dem fürs Radfahren geeignet ist immer etwas schwierig, da es hier auch auf das fahrerischen Können ankommt. Solche Aussagen tagt man dann im mtb:scale
SafetyIng (2022-09-12 17:15:03+00:00): When clean up parking and parking_space. You should also check parking=* ;)
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125737785
SafetyIng (2022-09-12 17:12:48+00:00): You created a lot of parkings inside a parking. Please clean it up. This changesets were caused damage.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125737810
MapTheWalk (2022-12-10 14:18:12+00:00): Hi nicholas77, the features added in this changeset do not reflect the reality on the ground. It will be reverted along with other erroneous changesets in the area.
martien-176 (2022-09-03 18:04:37+00:00): Hi, i am reviewing the mappings in this project.

I notice you map roads here. Remember that we are only mapping buildings in this project. This is detailed in the project instructions.

The buildings you mapped could be improved by tracing them more precise. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings. Avoid mapping several buildings as one building.

You can be fooled by the surrounding vegetation. That makes a building look unsquare, while in actuality it is not.

Thanks for your cooperation and regards,

Martien, HOT Global Validator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125737943
user_2066394 (2022-09-03 20:58:28+00:00): Das wären jetzt drei identische POIs, die an sich redundant sind.
MapTheWalk (2022-12-10 14:15:43+00:00): Hi nicholas77, the features added in this changeset do not reflect the reality in the ground. It will be reverted along with other erroneous changesets in the area.
MapTheWalk (2022-12-10 14:15:00+00:00): Hi nicholas77, the features added in this changeset do not reflect the reality in the ground. It will be reverted along with other erroneous changesets in the area.
MapTheWalk (2022-12-10 14:13:54+00:00): Hi nicholas77, the features added in this changeset do not reflect the reality in the ground. It will be reverted along with other similar changesets in the area.
martien-176 (2022-09-03 18:13:23+00:00): Hi, i am reviewing the mappings in this project.

You mapped multiple buildings as one building.

Please avoid this. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings. 

And please do not forget to square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. 

You can be fooled by the surrounding vegetation. That makes a building look unsquare, while in actuality it is not.

Thanks for your cooperation and regards,

Martien, HOT Global Validator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125738857
Oskar1818 (2022-09-03 13:50:05+00:00): pls change
eggie (2022-09-03 15:32:59+00:00): Hi user.. Thanks for your contribution.
I corrected the shopname Albert Heign and removed the address.
name= changed in operator=Geldmaat

Your edits https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=125739274

Greetz,
eggie
mcliquid (2022-09-04 05:53:08+00:00): Hallo maguscaelum,

du hast hier die Adresse gelöscht. Laut Bundesamt für Eich- und Vermessungswesen ist diese Adresse hier korrekt. Was führt dich zu deiner Änderung?

Außerdem schau dir doch mal diese Wikiseite zum Thema Changeset Kommentare an: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments

Vielen Dank
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125739369
martien-176 (2022-09-03 18:09:04+00:00): Hi, i am reviewing the mappings in this project.

I notice you map roads and water here. Remember that we are only mapping buildings in this project. This is detailed in the project instructions.

The buildings you mapped could be improved by tracing them more precise. Zoom in as close as possible to see the outline of the buildings, hit each corner of the building carefully. Look for shadows, open ground, changes in roof color and vegetation to differentiate buildings. Avoid mapping several buildings as one building. And please do not forget to square your buildings after tagging them by pressing ‘q’ on your keyboard. 

You can be fooled by the surrounding vegetation. That makes a building look unsquare, while in actuality it is not.

Thanks for your cooperation and regards,

Martien, HOT Global Validator
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125739573
user_2066394 (2022-09-03 20:47:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Misiek_G (2022-09-03 14:31:52+00:00): Proszę o wycofanie zmian, wkradł się błąd i przez przypadek usunęła się relacja multipolygon odpowiadająca za zalesiony obszar gór
RicoElectrico (2022-09-03 15:07:37+00:00): Zrobione. Na przyszłość JOSM ma plugin "reverter". Wtedy Dane -> Wycofaj zestaw zmian.
Fizzie-DWG (2023-10-22 23:50:10+00:00): DWG revert

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142992802
Patr1k_P (2022-09-06 08:05:51+00:00): opisne nazvy nedavame, ze je to kriz vyjadruje znacka 

historic=wayside_cross

...nazvy len oficialne alebo ked je niekde tabulka s nazvom
Florek89 (2023-03-02 17:41:52+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3581686
Zdublowano adres tutaj chyba, ja do adresów wolę się nie dotykać, więc jeżeli mógłbyś poprawić to to byłbym wdzięczny.
pio2_122 (2023-03-02 17:53:27+00:00): Jasne, poprawiłem.
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-04 07:11:52+00:00): Nemažai pridėta bicycle=no kur realybėje nėra jokio apribojimo (ženklo) važiuoti dviračiais.
MindaugasS (2022-09-04 13:37:39+00:00): Na, daugeliu iš jų techniškai neįmanoma važiuoti dviračiu (siauri, duobėti takeliai stačiais kalvų šlaitais ir pan.). Bet, žinoma, jei nereikia, galima tas žymes nuimti.
Tomas Straupis (2022-09-04 13:52:54+00:00): Suprantu, galbūt sunku važiuoti dviračiu, bet čia ateis MTB ir pasakys visai kitaip. Žodžiu „pravažiuojama/nepravažiuojama“ - tai gan subjektyvus dalykas, todėl žymime tai, ką galima objektyviai patikrinti - ženklas (KET ar parko) yra ar nėra.
ma-rt-in (2022-09-08 14:13:06+00:00): Hallo,

bitte nicht einfach sachen ändern die keinen sinn ergeben.

vg
Le_Viv_33 (2022-09-03 14:58:46+00:00): http://ateliernous.fr/downloads/NOUS-NARDAL.pdf
ZeLonewolf (2022-09-04 01:12:48+00:00): Hello,

Please provide a descriptive changeset comment, so that reviewers can understand what is being changed.
dvlpmnt (2022-09-04 04:26:58+00:00): Yeah if you want to edit Hidalgo or starr county, go ahead and be my guest. It’s only me and davidhansentiger doing this, and I’m doing a better job then the usga import. Your stringent adherence to formality Is what’s wrong with the OSM community and why you don’t get more super user contribution. I am making sweeping positive changes and you’re just watching from the sidelines.
woodpeck (2022-09-04 10:26:11+00:00): dvlpmnt, no contribution can be so good that it excuses shit behaviour. Someone so ready to sling expletives at other community members as you are is certainly not a "super user" of whom we need more. If experienced mappers are allowed to get a way with insulting others at the first opportunity, this falls back on OSM and will turn off those new contributors that the region dearly needs. So please: Lead with good example, don't explode just because someone dares to criticise something you did, and yes, please use good changeset comments as exercised by thousands of experienced mappers around the globe - so that newbies can see how OSM contributions ought to be.
AkuAnakTimur (2022-09-03 15:02:58+00:00): Their listing on said competitor's page also have comment from the previous owner. Just go check it out.
AkuAnakTimur (2022-09-03 15:09:09+00:00): Follow up changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125742138
Ray Mandes (2022-09-03 18:28:40+00:00): Edits too good for a description?
Ray Mandes (2022-09-03 19:16:43+00:00): Oh so the rules don't apply to dvlpmnt, pro level iD user, got it
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-04 08:27:12+00:00): @dvlpmnt Such insults are never ever OK in OSM.

@dvlpmnt Also, read and apply https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
Mateusz Konieczny (2022-09-04 08:27:52+00:00): > Also I have 3k edits and know what I’m doing.

Defending "w" as changeset comment means that no, you do not
woodpeck (2022-09-04 10:36:36+00:00): I have hidden the 2nd message in this thread in which dvlpmnt wrote: "<insult> you use rapidID so you don’t have any room to critique. Also I have 3k edits and know what I’m doing." Please remain calm and refrain from using expletives and insults.
LockOnGuy (2022-09-03 23:20:08+00:00): ok? ok what?             
Please explain your edit or at least say what you edited, please read:      
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments      
Also, If possible please keep edits local. That way you don't spam the history feed-globally.      
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets        
       
Now lets get back to your edit,  
Why did you delete the highway tag from: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/494261143/ ?
VictorIE (2024-08-05 18:34:12+00:00): Hi,

I'm wondering about access=no 

Is it not accessible to anyone, not even staff?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/42831464/history
Kuritsyn Roman (2022-10-16 15:43:53+00:00): Please adhere to the convention that the name= uses Russian.
Please do not do rash acts in a large area.
Sandal man (2022-10-24 21:15:20+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1091637482#map=17/42.22462/2.94836
Hi you forgot to yags this area
RicoElectrico (2022-09-03 16:42:12+00:00): Tam już był oznaczony brak dostępu, więc nawigacja i tak by nie poprowadziła.
pitscheplatsch (2022-09-06 18:50:08+00:00): Just a test?