piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
frodrigo (2018-07-08 11:15:30+00:00): La salle polyvalente n'est plus marqué comme un bâtiment. Je pense qu'elle est toujours là, non ?

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228060081#map=19/44.81150/-0.78235
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/228056865
DaveF (2018-03-29 21:25:51+00:00): Hi
Good to see you're unifying YHA tagging, but I don't think it's correct to duplicate data. such as addresses or the tourism tag. 
As YHAs can have multiple buildings, such as Bath, I think they're best suited to being on the boundary polygon.
Leo Slager (2018-03-30 14:16:51+00:00): Wat zijn je bronnen ?
Er is niets te vinden van de sluiting van deze garage. Op de website wordt elfs het aantal beschikbare plaatsen real time getoond !
Dit lijkt op puur vandalisme.
Leo Slager (2018-03-30 14:30:54+00:00): Sorry, ik zie nu dat de nieuwbouw in gebruik is genomen.
Leo Slager (2018-03-30 14:54:04+00:00): Nogmaals mijn excuses, ik zie nu dat ik 2 ondergrondse garages met elkaar heb verwisseld. wat mij betreft staat het nu allemaal correct op de kaart.
A67-A67 (2018-03-30 15:03:34+00:00): De parkeerplaats is hier volledig van de kaart verwijderd, terwijl hij nog steeds bestaat. Ik heb de parkeerplaats en -garage hersteld en access=private toegevoegd om aan te geven dat het een privé-parkeerplaats is.
Leo Slager (2018-03-30 15:33:38+00:00): correct
streckenkundler (2018-03-30 11:16:30+00:00): Hei,

type=multipolygon zu verwenden ist falsch. Dieser Relationtyp darf keine aneinandergrezende Outers haben. (wgl. Wiki). Es kommt zum Fehlertype"duplicate segment in relation": http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=13.91352&lat=52.22060&zoom=14&opacity=0.97&overlays=duplicate_node,single_node_in_way,duplicate_segment,way_in_multiple_rings,intersection,intersecting_segments,ring_not_closed,touching_rings,role_should_be_inner,role_should_be_outer,inner_with_same_tags,ways

Bitte stattdessen type=site verwenden...

Danke,

Sven
Aleks-Berlin (2018-03-30 14:34:56+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Erledigt.
eggie (2018-03-29 15:13:20+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-29 15:19:02+00:00): review:
Soms zetten we op een weg oneway=no wanneer je bang bent dat iemand oneway=yes gaat taggen. Je kunt de extra tag in dit geval gewoon weghalen.
Wanneer je je landuse=grass source=3dshapes  verabdert van vorm kun je de source aanpassen aan bv local knowledge, survey of kadaster pdok 2017.
Niet de BING gebruiken als achtergrond. Die ligt behoorlijk verschoven. Dus in ID de achtergrond veranderen naar "luchtfoto pdok". Graag reactie.
JeroenDHL1980 (2018-03-29 17:46:36+00:00): Bedankt voor de uitleg.
Ik ga mij binnenkort me hier in verdiepen.
Leo Slager (2018-04-02 15:22:07+00:00): oneway=reversible lijkt mij zeer onwaarschijnlijk. Wat zijn je bronnen ?
Kijk maar eens in de wiki voor de betekenis van deze tag.
eggie (2018-04-02 15:51:32+00:00): Lijkt me ook. Je hebt dat meer in grote steden in de USA 's-morgens de stad in en 's-middags de stad uit.
jc86035 (2018-03-29 13:47:50+00:00): China uses different tagging to Hong Kong; only the Chinese name should be in the main "name" tag and "Fugang Road" should be in the "name:en" tag.
nlehuby (2018-05-18 12:53:01+00:00): Bonjour,

Es-tu certain de la classification de cette portion de la Rue du Jour ? Cela la met étonnamment en  valeur par rapport aux rues alentours...
LeFourbe (2018-05-18 20:10:47+00:00): Erreur de type quand j'ai ajouté la bande cyclable. Je l'ai rétabli. Désolé de cette erreur.
nlehuby (2018-05-19 08:16:58+00:00): Merci :)
viloan (2018-03-29 14:04:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
Tim Couwelier (2018-03-29 14:51:41+00:00): Geachte,

Welkom bij openstreetmap. Fijn je inspanningen te zijn, maar graag geven we je nog even mee (zoals in het introductiefilmpje) dat het aangewezen is je getekende gebouwen even rechthoeking te maken.. 

in iD kan je het gebouw selecteren, en dan even op 'S' drukken op je toetsenbord. Het ziet er allemaal net iets juister/eleganter uit en is een kleine moeite.

Fijn dat je ook met de adressen netjes aan de slag gaat. Indien je vragen hebt, stuur me gerust een privéberichting, stel je vraag op het forum (forum.openstreetmap.org - de subrubriek voor de belgische gebruikers), of spring even binnen in ons chatkanaal (https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org)
GPLV2 (2018-03-29 14:55:20+00:00): Hallo,

Welkom bij OSM, als je hulp nodig hebt,  geef ons een seintje, je kan even dag komen zeggen en dit doen in ons chat kanaal https://riot.im/app/#/room/#osmbe:matrix.org

Paar kleine opmerkingen over uw edit :

addr:city mag je zo laten, dat is niet nodig aangezien het adres op een andere manier wordt bepaald.

Een iets grotere fout is het gebruik van 'area=yes'  Dit is praktisch nooit nodig tenzij paar gespecialiseerde cases.  Ik denk dat dit gebouwen zijn dus de oplossing daar is building=yes ipv area=yes

Ik ben dit even aan het valideren en zal de correcties doorvoeren. 

Kom zeker eens langs in ons kanaal, zeer interessant dat een professionele data gebruiker bijdraagt aan dit project.

Mvg,

Glenn
brianboru (2020-12-09 13:54:40+00:00): Hi Russ

This power line doesn't look this way in the latest bing imagery - I can't see any pylons but I can see disturbed patches of vegetation where it looks like they might have been removed Rgds Brian
Russ (2020-12-09 14:06:01+00:00): Hi Brian,

Thanks - can you give me a link to the line in question as this changeset touched a few? I can take a look into it.

Russ
brianboru (2020-12-09 14:27:13+00:00): Russ it's Way: 574505782
Russ (2020-12-09 14:47:28+00:00): Thanks! I've sorted that now, although there are probably also changes at the other end where there's a housing development.
jc86035 (2018-04-01 17:25:19+00:00): Tagging convention for Mainland China is to only include the Chinese label in name=*; not sure why you added the English name as well.
BCNorwich (2018-03-29 17:08:37+00:00): Hello and Welcome to OpenStreetMap.
Thanks for your addition to OSM, the hotel building is already tagged so as the POI is duplication, I have put your new data on the building.  
Regards Bernard
dgitto (2018-06-20 05:54:11+00:00): Perché hai cancellato il nome dalla rotatoria in piazza? e da pezzetti attigui di highway?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/334857992
dgitto (2018-06-20 06:05:56+00:00): Perché togli la key name da piazzette e parcheggi come questo?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/423973386
dgitto (2018-06-20 06:13:25+00:00): E come questa https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/243893748
dgitto (2018-06-20 06:18:22+00:00): Qua hai tolto anche l'alt_name "Largo dei Mille". Credi sia sbagliato?
fayor (2018-06-20 14:41:56+00:00): Preferisco evitare di mettere il nome sui tratti interni alle piazze, visto che il nome c'è già sull'area che li comprende.
user_5359 (2018-03-29 17:59:15+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards
chillly (2018-03-30 20:53:19+00:00): Errrr, surely the website is copyright. DO you have permission to use this in OSM? 

We take copyright VERY seriously
EgrettaGarzetta (2018-03-30 23:14:37+00:00): I understand that, a little better today than yesterday; but does that mean the names of the hostels can't be used without permission or does it mean they can't be used because they're copyright?
SomeoneElse (2018-03-31 11:30:25+00:00): @EgrettaGarzetta OSM would need data released under an appropriate licence in order to be able to use it.  There's some information at https://www.openstreetmap.org/copyright .  There's more information over at https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import , and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/GettingPermission might also be useful.  It may be that the YHA have absolutely no problem with this data being available to OSM (and downstream users of OSM) or it may be that they have a very big problem with it - until they've been asked, we simply don't know.  An example website does say "© 2017 YHA (England & Wales)" so without further information, it is likely that this data will need to be removed.
As mentioned elsewhere, if you'd like to discuss this with the wider GB community, https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb is probably the best place.
Best Regards,
Andy Townsend, on behalf of OSM's Data Working Group.
SomeoneElse (2018-04-23 19:58:33+00:00): As I read the thread at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-gb/2018-April/thread.html#21270 , YHA haven't given permission for this data to be used.  Are you still working to get that permission?
mweper (2018-03-29 17:43:37+00:00): Hola Belén. Los datos de los puntos de interés (PDI), no se deben cartografiar junto con datos de una interpolación de altura. Ya corregí ese tema y puse el pub en su nodo correspondiente con sus etiquetas correspondientes (https://osm.org/node/5514738086).
-
Cualquier duda que tengas, me puedes contactar.
DaveF (2018-04-10 23:04:27+00:00): Hi
To check, what is the reason for these split ways? The one's I've checked appear to have the same tags as the way they been split from. Except you've somehow removed all route relations.
DaveF (2018-04-18 13:49:24+00:00): I've reverted this Chainset
erantr1 (2018-05-06 08:41:52+00:00): Hi Dave,
I split the ways since I got info about construction work in some parts of these streets. The original way included parts with construction and parts that weren't blocked and therefore I did the split. I did make sure that there were no turn restrictions that can be damaged by this change, but I missed the other relations. Thank you for fixing it.
viloan (2018-03-29 14:56:31+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Também temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
user_5359 (2018-03-29 17:56:45+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment for a better description of payments. Please add more details as the generic credit_cards /debit_cards.
AndresDuhour (2022-07-28 18:16:21+00:00): Buenas tardes! En la continuación de Berón de Astrada las etiquetas addr:street decían "El Tala", así que recorté ese tramo de una cuadra y le asigné ese nombre a la calle. Calculo que era la intención porque la numeración cambia en Avenida Güemes. Saludos!
Diego Krein (2022-07-28 21:48:34+00:00): Hola AndresDohour, muchas gracias por tus aportes. Esta perfecto, Saludos
Supaplex (2019-02-08 15:54:13+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
Supaplex (2018-03-30 04:53:50+00:00): 兩個問題
1. 如果是用台北市的建築高度資料，請註明來源
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:source
2. 台北市的資料格式，與OpenStreetMap的標示方式略有不同，簡單說市府資料是垂直取樣，OpenStreetMap的標示則是水平。
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_buildings
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57636808
SomeoneElse (2018-03-29 18:24:19+00:00): Hi,
Can you explain what "split ways and removed turn restriction" means here?  Also what's the source of the change?
Best Regards,
Andy
erantr1 (2018-05-06 08:45:46+00:00): Hi Andy,
I received an update about construction work in this part of the street and thought it would be a good idea to split in order to adapt it for the upcoming change. In any case, I can revert it if you think it's necessary.
SomeoneElse (2018-05-06 09:24:54+00:00): That doesn't explain the turn restriction https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3086416/history which was at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1312264600 ?
erantr1 (2018-05-07 10:39:45+00:00): Hi Andy,
Regarding the turn restriction - I had to refresh my memory to realize why I removed it. The restriction (only_straight_on) was defined from way 230192075 to way 183555228. I was mistaken to think that it is defined from 183555228 to 230191864, which would have created a non-justified dead-end due to construction works I was reported about in Queen Victoria Street.
Sorry for this mistake. I will put this TR back in place.
All the best,
Eran.
mueschel (2018-04-01 12:49:31+00:00): Hi,
this way got several access tags, which aren't right. Could you explain what the actual access rules are? I guess it can easily be tagged with access:conditional=*

Thanks, Jan
corfede (2018-07-02 11:54:47+00:00): Ciao usbe, cosa intendevi mappare con tutti quegli access:hour_off/on? Come suggerito da mueschel eventualmente dovresti usare access:conditional=* o meglio motor_vehicle:conditional=* se l'accesso condizionale è riferito solo ai veicoli a motore. Grazie, Federico.
eggie (2018-03-29 15:50:35+00:00): name=huisarts is hetgeen dat gaat renderen. name:nl wordt alleen in de provincie Friesland gebruikt voor de Nederlandse naam. Ik pas het aan.
eggie (2018-03-29 15:52:30+00:00): name=Huisartsenpraktijk Blokland ipv name:nl=
literan (2018-03-30 11:22:47+00:00): нет здесь никакого Бабушкинского суда, он переехал в новое здание https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5477756022#map=19/55.87379/37.67753 Не надо, плиз, вносить сведения из устаревших данных http://mos-gorsud.ru/rs/babushkinskij
GinaroZ (2018-03-29 19:40:34+00:00): Hi, I've removed this as it is a duplicate of one I added a few weeks ago :)
pitscheplatsch (2018-03-30 12:01:31+00:00): Hi klaranovikova, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several buildings and ways? Thanks.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57638118
pitscheplatsch (2018-03-30 12:00:41+00:00): Hi klaranovikova, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several buildings and ways? Thanks.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57638314
user_5359 (2018-03-29 17:54:05+00:00): Welcome to OSM! The tag area=yes without any more information is useless. What do you want to achieve with your entry? See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/574545889
b-jazz (2018-10-25 18:27:07+00:00): Removed way that has no basis in satellite imagery and no response from creator.
ndm (2018-03-29 20:54:55+00:00): OpenStreetmap is about what is actually present -- you shouldn't change names that are from on-the-ground surveys.

Plus, you would have to have a licence from YHA to use their copyrighted material on OpenStreetmap.
ndm (2018-03-29 21:02:02+00:00): I suggest you discuss it on the talk-gb mailing list before making further YHA-related edits.
user_5173844 (2018-03-31 10:46:37+00:00): Personally I think ndm's interpretation of project quality standards and copyright laws is overly strict and should not be treated as an official opinion of the osm community. (neither should be mine) 

Indeed it is good to discuss larger contributions like this in public, and perhaps get yha involved too, but it is not by any means a requirement for further contributions.
SomeoneElse (2018-03-31 11:17:58+00:00): As ndm says, the best place to discuss things like this with the wider GB community is https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb .  Good luck!
ndm (2018-03-31 17:52:57+00:00): https://www.yha.org.uk/ has "© 2017 YHA (England & Wales)". Like OpenStreetmap has "© OpenStreetMap contributors". If you believe the second is important -- then so is the first.

Anyway, If there's agreement on the mailing list then there's less likelihood of changes being reverted.
pitscheplatsch (2018-03-30 12:00:19+00:00): Hi klaranovikova, welcome to OSM.

May I know the reason behind deleting several buildings and ways? Thanks.

See http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=57639008
chnav (2018-03-29 17:50:37+00:00): addr:sreet используется только для адресов зданий и прочих объектов. На линиях улиц нужен только name.
atcomapper (2018-03-30 08:19:14+00:00): Please note we normally use the source:maxspeed tag in Denmark, not maxspeed:type
Supaplex (2018-03-30 04:41:21+00:00): 還沒完工，甚至還沒動工只是提案階段，應用life cycle的方式標示，railway=proposed, proposed=subway
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/57640082
user_5359 (2018-03-29 17:50:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please notice: the minimum keys for an address is addr:street and addr:housenumber! Can you add the value for the street name, please?
Infidellic33 (2018-03-29 18:37:20+00:00): Hi there, thanks for looking over this. It's not exactly clear to me (newbie) what you've changed, can you clarify what and why for me?

Many thanks
BCNorwich (2018-03-29 18:54:56+00:00): Hi,
I added addr:country=GB to facilitate worldwide search, (OSM is a worldwide database).
Removed payment:coins=yes, not needed as covered by payment:cash=yes.
Removed payment:credit_cards=yes as this is not specifically recognized as individual card types are recognized, (amex, visa etc.).
Removed payment:debit_cards=yes as this is not specifically recognized as individual card types are recognized.
You could use payment:credit_cards=yes and/or payment:debit_cards=yes when/if the card types aren't specified.
Regards Bernard
Infidellic33 (2018-03-30 10:13:33+00:00): Thanks for getting back to me. That all makes sense and I appreciate you fixing it up. Thank you
will_p (2018-03-29 22:35:12+00:00): Welcome to OpenStreetMap.

Just to note that I removed your earlier edit because you changed the oneway=no tag on Upper Parliament Street to oneway=reversible. That was incorrect because the 'reversible' value actually means the street is oneway, but the direction can change. 

The oneway=no tag indicates the street is two way. It is an optional tag, so there was no harm done by you removing it, but the change wasn't necessary.

You might like to read the relevant wiki page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:oneway

Regards,
Will
voschix (2022-05-08 21:35:11+00:00): Hi, you inserted  several "permissive" footways on the grounds and aslo some indoors. But the museum charges an entrance fee, so access=customers plus fee=yes seems to describe this better. What is the source for the geometry of the indoors footways?
Greetings from Padova, Volker
CycleStreets (2022-05-08 21:53:07+00:00): La fuente de la geometría fue una visita en persona, a tu maravillosa ciudad.

Buen punto sobre el etiquetado de acceso. Ahora arreglado en:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120720262

---
[en:]

The source of geometry was a visit in person, to your wonderful city.

Good point about the access tagging. Now fixed in:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120720262
CycleStreets (2022-05-08 21:55:06+00:00): La fonte della geometria è stata una visita di persona, nella tua meravigliosa città.

Un buon punto circa il tagging di accesso. Ora riparato:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/120720262
muralito (2018-03-30 20:31:43+00:00): The whole interesction was redesigned and construction finished a couple of months ago. We need updated aerial imagery or on site survey...
Daern (2018-04-01 15:48:41+00:00): OK, of course.
Mateusz Konieczny (2025-05-02 12:21:43+00:00): Hello! https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5493414922/history has shop = Celebration supplies store that was added in this edit
shop=Celebration supplies store ? What kind of shop, if any is here? Is it intentionally used instead of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=party ? If yes, what is the difference? Should we document this shop value as distinct, valid and useful?
eggie (2018-03-30 05:46:58+00:00): Removed.name=5B and wilderness_hut. ...edit gives no sense.
alphensebezorger (2020-04-23 14:39:18+00:00): Hallo AdVerburg, zo te zien is deze boei nogal een eindje afgedreven. Wel precies naar een punt waar noorderbreedte en westerlengte gelijk zijn. 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5514798499
Kun je eens kijken wat er misgegaan is?
Vriendelijke groet, Alphensebezorger.
AdVerburg (2020-04-23 15:09:48+00:00): Het was (nu weggedaan) een boei voor zeilwedstrijden, die ik met verkeerde locatie had neergezet.
Bedoeld was / is 51.238833 	2.887500.
Bedankt voor de melding.
M.v.g. Ad
eggie (2018-03-29 18:30:00+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
eggie (2018-03-29 18:43:52+00:00): Dag pieter.. Op de Ring lopen ook busroutes. Die mag je niet zomaar onderbreken met editor iD. Het fietspad dat ik heb getekend op 8 februari is nu een tertiaryroad. 

Dat lijkt me niet goed. 
Is echt alles al klaar hier?
Is er al een verbinding met de Spoorlaan?
eggie (2018-03-29 18:54:30+00:00): Van de Handelsweg af heb je eenrichtingverkeerd ingevoerd. Dat kan toch niet kloppen?.. Ook de tertiaryweg loopt als eenrichting eindigend in een fietspad?
Graag reactie
eggie (2018-03-29 19:06:23+00:00): Ik heb het fietspad even aangepast.., maar nog op construction gezet. de oneway=yes heb ik van de hoofdrijbaan gehaald.
pietervanbergeijk (2018-03-29 20:27:07+00:00): Ha eggie. Dank voor je tekst en uitleg. Ik ben nieuw hier en heb een en ander snel aangepast. Mijn excuses dat dat niet helemaal volgens het boekje is gegaan. De rotonde is helemaal open en de verbinding met de Handelsweg/Voorweg is ook aangesloten op de rotonde en in gebruik. Ik weet niet of hetzelfde geldt voor de Spoorlaan. Hier zal ik morgen even naar kijken als ik langs rij...
eggie (2018-03-29 20:55:08+00:00): Oke... 'k Ben hier in de regio ook lokale mapper dus dan is het nog snel gegaan.
Begin februari heb ik de fietspaden daar aangepast toen ik langs reed.
Ik zet de tunnel open en pas even de rotonde en buslijnen aan. Dat oude weggedeelte haal ik er dan tussenuit. Het fietspad laat ik nog even op construction staan, want als de verbinding met de spoorlijn nog niet klaar is heeft dat  nog geen zin. 
Heeft het nieuwe gedeelte al een straatnaam?
Bedankt voor je reactie.
Groet,
Eggie