piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
ququruzka (2022-08-14 19:51:54+00:00): будь ласка, не використовйте інші мови в назвах вулиць на території України . 
ваші змінені дані будуть видалені.
Fandarel (2022-08-13 14:21:03+00:00): Warum hast du den Namen zugefügt? Es gibt gute Gründe, ihn wegzulassen, wenn das Objekt nicht mehr existiert ( abandoned). Verwende old_name stattdessen. Gruß, Fandarel
Svalbard (2023-06-03 17:07:00+00:00): Hallo mardiz, ich schließe mich der Frage von Fandarel an. Was soll die Beschreibung, die es bereits in einem Extra-tag gibt, im Namen? Tagging für den Renderer? Gruß Svalbard
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 07:53:57+00:00): This changeset reverts some or all edits made in changesets 124815987, 124816027, 124816072, 124816146, 124816185, 124816604, 124816631, 124816648, 124816668, 124816687, 124816716, 124816741, 124816779, 124816813, 124816840, 124816870, 124816896, 124816913, 124816941, 124816973, 124819346, 124819385, 124819418, 124819465, 124819514, 124819576, 124819610, 124819641, 124819670.
SekeRob (2022-08-13 09:37:19+00:00): Unknown and mix of imagery with different offsets used in this area makes fitting elements hard. Please check past used for area consistency.
dgitto (2022-08-13 08:32:31+00:00): Benvenuto in OSM
armitageone (2022-08-30 05:03:52+00:00): Исправлено на "Водопой для животных" с "Водяной колонки"
user_2066394 (2022-08-13 09:23:14+00:00): Ist dort kein Leerstand mehr?
muc-osm (2022-08-13 09:55:48+00:00): nein, ab 03/22 ist dort eine der geliebten Covid-19 Teststationen, seit dem auch im OSM eingetragen, leider nicht im "Web-OSM" angezeigt, sichtbar dafür im OSMand
user_2066394 (2022-08-13 10:12:00+00:00): Das wäre eben der Gedanke  beim lifecycle prefix, man würde den Knoten bei neuer Nutzung weiterverwenden und aktualisieren.
Cy R (2022-08-13 21:46:30+00:00): I think it's technically a cycleway=track from Lake City Way to Cowen Pl NE at the south end of the bridge (except for the segments approaching/departing the larger arterial intersections where the bollard rows end--if you feel like mapping at that level of detail). 

The distinction is kinda cloudy without a solid barrier, but you can see the difference between the cycleway types on 15th Ave south of Cowen Pl NE where the cycleway becomes a bare lane adjacent to traffic and also northbound where the cycleway is well-protected from vehicles as a passage between the designated street-side parking lane and the sidewalk. People aren't supposed to drive over the noodle bollards, but I've downgraded a track to a lane along a road where cars have all but destroyed the separation.

Anyway, thanks for the updates. I took a video survey of the updated construction here but never got around to tagging. Glad to see it on the map!
pesticides (2022-08-14 00:18:03+00:00): Thanks for the explanation! I updated it to cycleway=track in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/124870787 (except for the areas where the bollards disappear by intersections).
SekeRob (2022-08-14 13:05:25+00:00): Hi,

As you keep creating 'island-all' pathways, this wiki explaining the issue. 

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing

All path ways must connect back to the global highway network. footpaths and steps are too part of that network. Especially objects like squares and pedestrian areas are none routable as well. Ways, however imaginary must be mapped across to wherever the person would walk, the next sidewalk or parking aisle e.g. 

Another classic is appending ways that allow e.g. motor vehicles, when the earlier part in the way is tagged as not allowed. Creates an island-car situation.

cheers
pippo6 (2022-11-19 16:11:56+00:00): Sorry for the late reply, thank you for fixing!
SekeRob (2022-11-19 17:10:33+00:00): Hi,

There's a supplemental tag another 'auditing' mapper pointed out to me when being asked about me using artificial_path=yes which I got from the UK , instead now using virtual=yes for paths to satisfy routing software, so I revisited all the cases where I the artificial.

Like so many tags barely found when scanning the Italian territory only.

ciao
nevw (2022-08-13 09:42:59+00:00): Hi
This area is not named 111 and I am unsure why you named it this, but I have deleted the name.
archie (2022-08-13 08:54:28+00:00): Fel kommentar t ändrings-cs. Rätt: junction=circular istf roundabout eftersom korsas av bussfil.
kepivar (2022-08-23 18:26:19+00:00): landuse=residential is wrong for admin boundaries!
ChehrehBargi (2022-08-19 18:52:16+00:00): با سلام
ضمن خسته نباشید، در اینجا هیچ مانع فیزیکی یا تابلو که نشان دهنده دوربرگردان و یا مجاز بودن آن باشد وجود ندارد و ما مجاز به ثبت موارد غیرواقعی یا حالت ایده آل (که هنوز در آنجا وجود ندارد ولی دلخواه ماست) نیستیم.
Saeed SJ (2022-08-24 04:15:44+00:00): سلام، روز بخیر.
بله در اینجا گزارشی داشتیم از چندکاربر که تاکید کرده بودند قبل از میدان امکان دور زدن وجود دارد.
بنظر فاصله تا میدان به اندازه ای هست که اجازه دور زدن در این نقطه داشته باشند، ضمن اینکه تابلو یا مانعی برای 
 عدم دور زدن وجود ندارد
(طبق تصویر 360 درجه نشان )
با تشکر
ChehrehBargi (2022-08-24 15:00:53+00:00): فرمایش شما صحیح هست، با اینکه تابلو دورزدن ممنوع نداریم و فاصله هم هست، اما باید جداکننده‌ای وجود داشته باشد لاکن اگر مسیر هم باشد، با استناد به این دست موارد مجاز خواهیم بود از جایی که ماشین بتواند از معبری عبور کند راه خواهیم کشید حتی اگر باعث تصادف شود یا غیرقانونی باشد.
ChehrehBargi (2022-08-24 15:03:24+00:00): البته الان که دقت میکنم در حال حاضر که میدان مسدود هست، مسیریابی گمراه کننده خواهد بود.
تا باز شدن میدان، لینک ایجاد کنیم...
ChehrehBargi (2022-08-24 15:10:33+00:00): اصلاح جمله‌بندی بالا:
فرمایش شما متین؛ با اینکه تابلو دورزدن ممنوع نداریم و فاصله هم هست، لاکن باید جداکننده‌ای وجود داشته باشد. با استناد به ثبت‌های مشابه این، مجاز خواهیم بود از جایی که مسیری باشد و ماشین بتواند از معبری عبور کند راه بکشیم حتی اگر باعث تصادف شود یا غیرقانونی باشد.
Saeed SJ (2022-08-26 13:24:17+00:00): بله شما درست میفرمایید و ما معمولا در این موارد دوربرگردانی رسم نمیکنیم مگر درمواردی که با جدا کننده مسیر اون مشخص شده باشه اما در این موقعیت به دلیل اینکه گزارشات زیادی دریافت کردیم و مانعی برای دور زدن وجود ندارد موقتا این دوربرگردان رو رسم کردیم.
سپاس از همراهی و توجه شما
ChehrehBargi (2022-08-26 15:21:47+00:00): سلامت باشید
SekeRob (2022-08-13 13:40:53+00:00): The wiki link v.v 'island all' and other disconnect issues: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Inspector/Views/Routing

Areas are no routable elements, paths, ways must be mapped across however imaginary to get from point A to point B on planet earth.
limes11 (2022-08-16 01:14:41+00:00): Hi, 

kannst Du hier bitte kurz die aktuelle Lage schildern? 

Mit access=no und foot=permissive ist der footway etwas seltsam erfasst. Außer foot ist sowieso niemand erlaubt. 

VG, Limes
limes11 (2022-08-16 01:15:06+00:00): Link vergessen: Ich meinte, hier kurz die Situation schildern:

https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/3211076
user_2066394 (2022-08-14 08:01:46+00:00): Ist aber eher unabhängig von der MapRoulette-Challenge?
The_Nickname (2022-08-14 08:08:42+00:00): Ja, aber wenn ich mir den Ausschnitt eh schon ansehe kann ich auch andere Dinge updaten usw., dachte ich mir
user_2066394 (2022-08-14 08:14:09+00:00): Logo, aber anderer Changeset-Kommentar würde Sinn machen.
The_Nickname (2022-08-14 08:35:47+00:00): Ich werds versuchen, hab mir jz auch nochmal den Wiki eintrag durch gelesen, wüsse aber nicht was ich wesentlich besser machen könnte.
Vielleicht kannst du es mir sagen welcher Teil wie besser wäre?
user_2066394 (2022-08-14 08:48:08+00:00): Ist relativ einfach :-) Im Changeset wird die genannte MapRoulette-Challenge nicht bearbeitet, also ist der Kommentar sowieso irreführend. Welche Wiki-Seite hast du angeschaut?
The_Nickname (2022-08-14 09:00:48+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
Gut also die Challange weglassen, auch den #?
Und dann einfach nur weg an Luftbild angepasst oder so?
user_2066394 (2022-08-14 09:05:34+00:00): "smoothed path" reicht vollkommen
The_Nickname (2022-08-14 09:08:24+00:00): ok, und den # auch aus dem #feld löschen oder behalten weil ich ja darüber erst aufmerksam geworden bin?
user_2066394 (2022-08-14 09:33:39+00:00): Hm. Den Hashtag würde ich auch rausnehmen, der kommt ja ursprünglich von "#maproulette ..."

 Vielleicht noch Zitat dazu aus https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Good_changeset_comments
"Pass auch auf, nicht einen älteren Kommentar zu verwenden, der nicht zu deinen Bearbeitungen passt."
Langlaeufer (2022-08-14 10:23:40+00:00): Danke für die Korrektur. Dann hatte ich das Schild übersehen oder es hatte zwischenzeitlich gefehlt
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124847052
user_5359 (2022-08-17 08:26:36+00:00): Hello! Please have a look on https://www.osm.org/way/1085822319. What is the meaning of the tag 
187A = 187
?
Chivos (2022-08-16 11:40:50+00:00): Bonjour chamdam,
Merci pour les corrections sur Uzès.
J'ai contacté l'utilisateur SiiG, qui est un professionnel local qui abime beaucoup certaines données, dont les hiérarchies de voies...
megaloman-it (2022-10-05 21:37:27+00:00): Ciao @ivanbranco,
credo che ti sia sfuggito una modifica massiva errata: ho visto che hai rimosso dai turet i tag artwork_type ma nel farlo hai anche modificato i tag wikidata e wikipedia.
Direi che quelli giusti sono
- key "wikipedia" value "it:Toret"
- key "subject:wikidata" value "Q3993741"

Ti torna? In caso affermativo, ti spiacerebbe correggere questo changeset?
Il precedente tuo changeset (124847976) l'ho già corretto io, solo che io da osmand ci metto un po' a rivedere i vari POI uno per uno, invece da quanto deduco tu hai fatto queste modifiche con un altro editor che facilita le modifiche massime :)

Fammi sapere, grazie mille, ciao!
ivanbranco (2022-10-05 21:47:46+00:00): A me sembrava piu' specifico fountain:wiki=*

non capisco però perché il valore wikidata in subject:wikidata=* e il valore wikipedia in wikipedia=* (senza prefisso subject:)?
ivanbranco (2022-10-05 21:53:26+00:00): subject:wiki "a link to wiki article about the topic of the feature (for example, person depicted by the statue)"

Le fontane non hanno come argomento il "Toret", sono dei Toret, per quello avevo pensato al tag fountain:wikidata.

Ma se vuoi mettiamo subject:wiki. wikipedia=* è basta è sbagliato però , in quanto serve per pagine che descrivono un elemento in particolare. Secondo me è come aggiungere "wikipedia=it:Nasone" a tutte le fontane di Roma o "wikipedia=it:Chiesa" invece di "wikipedia=it:Chiesa di San Tizio" ad una chiesa per dire.
megaloman-it (2022-10-06 18:29:33+00:00): Ciao, allora, per quanto riguarda
"subject:wikidata"
l'ho trovato indicato nella pagina wiki di osm (l'ho scoperto ieri in realtà) 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:fountain=toret?uselang=en

Per wikipedia io non vedo niente di strano nel mettere a tutti i turet il collegamento alla pagina di wikipedia (così come per tutti i nasoni a Roma); effettivamente è proprio grazie a quel link che ho scoperto che i turet avevano una pagina su wikipedia; per la chiesa ovviamente no, perché tutti sanno cosa è una chiesa, e ha senso metterne la pagina solo se la chiesa particolare ha una pagina dedicata.
È un po' come per i supermercati e il tag website: se il sito del supermercato ha la pagina del singolo punto vendita, allora va bene mettere quella (che in genere indica orari, servizi offerti etc.), altrimenti si mette la homepage del sito di brand, almeno l'utente vede che tipo di supermercato è.

Più che altro non capivo i tag con il fountain: davanti, mi sembravano errori perché sia
fountain:wikidata
che
fountain:wikipedia
non rimandavano alla relativa pagina.
Se guardi qui
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/4190494954
i tag con fountain: non sono cliccabili.
Invece qui
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7852929583
i tag senza fountain: conducono alla relativa pagina di wikipedia e wikidata.
megaloman-it (2022-10-06 19:08:21+00:00): Mah, in realtà ho appena scoperto che per i supermercati è meglio usare brand:website per il sito del brand, e website e basta per l'eventuale sito del punto vendita
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 18:33:26+00:00): Can you be more specific? What errors did you fix?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
ivanbranco (2022-08-13 16:17:16+00:00): Hi OSMoz,

I think you forgot to define the place value here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9950771994

Good mapping :)
Branko Kokanovic (2022-08-14 18:39:43+00:00): 1. jel si siguran da je ova staza (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679769712) biciklisticka? Danas sam prosao, nema ni oznaka, ni znaka za bajs. Svakako smatram da treba da ostane ovako oznaceno, jer povecava connectivity bici staza!
2. Ovaj prelaz (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085990988) postoji, ali se bicikle zavrsavaju nekih 50m ranije. Jel ti OK da ispravim to?

BTW, danas sam prosao od Hajd parka bulevarom, preko crnotravske i niz bulevar do autokomande da obelezim sve sta fali i sad vidim da si ti to uradio nedavno:)
JIDB (2022-08-14 08:20:40+00:00): Der Kommentar hätte eigentlich "POIs" werden sollen.
aTarom (2022-08-13 14:48:03+00:00): Hi, plennert, 
"description"="Hängt an Stütze"
correspond to something like
"support"="wall_mounted"?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9950831310/history
and do you have more info about the tag
"emergency"="fire_detection_system"
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9950800248/history
Cheers
SHARCRASH (2022-08-13 11:36:53+00:00): + cycleways corrected
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 18:33:22+00:00): Can you be more specific? What errors did you fix?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 18:33:18+00:00): Can you be more specific? What errors did you fix?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 18:33:14+00:00): Can you be more specific? What errors did you fix?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
user_5359 (2022-08-17 08:39:26+00:00): Welcome to OSM! Please don't add any temporary appointment data to OSM! You can add this directly to your map (for example set a marker)
bxl-forever (2022-08-13 17:43:47+00:00): Hello,

This change has been reverted for this POI: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/30415879

Please ignore Osmose warnings about languages.  There are multiple rules for languages in Belgium, e.g. Federal government offices (trilingual), Community government offices (mololingual), EU (English), international institutions, embassies… which do not follow the basic rule for street names.
RaphaelPasloin (2022-08-14 03:33:15+00:00): ok thanks for the info.
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 18:33:10+00:00): Can you be more specific? What errors did you fix?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group
marczoutendijk (2022-08-20 18:32:53+00:00): Can you be more specific? What errors did you fix?

Marc Zoutendijk  
OpenStreetMap Foundation  
Data Working Group
Branko Kokanovic (2022-08-14 18:42:51+00:00): Hvala za ove ispravke bici staza po NBGD-u. Trudim se da ga odrzavam, ali zaboravim ove "segragated" ili "designated" tagove tu i tamo:)
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 15:26:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124857586 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 15:26:31+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124857586 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 15:26:35+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124857586 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 15:26:36+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124857586 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
Frans S (2022-09-13 08:55:02+00:00): Thank you for mapping. You have correctly identified the location of most buildings and mapped. Important: Please be sure to square all rectangular buildings with the Q key which you did not.
Reviewed by a validator at random or as requested. 
FYI. Please view this video about common new mappers mistakes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xs5wX592E1o&amp;t=2s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ltn1VOiq5_0
On this document you will find some hints and tricks which might help to improve your mapping skills
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Swwz-ZwM3_YOstqstsmCg1-lNAPbnMLpi1Al-h-2UOQ/edit
Best regards and keep mapping.
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124851551
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 15:26:32+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124857586 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
abakus_uploader (2022-08-13 22:31:38+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
abakus_uploader (2022-08-13 22:32:06+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
redd (2022-08-15 20:54:01+00:00): Danke
karlrt (2022-10-23 10:25:43+00:00): Hi, you mapped some of the buildings with their shadow or viewed from the side. (See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1085985420#map=20/38.01036/23.69964&layers=H)

If a building has a rectangular floor-plan, map the floor plan, not the view from the side. Here's a tutorial: https://youtu.be/nswUcgMfKTM?t=131
Fra00 (2022-08-14 08:16:25+00:00): I am once again telling you this: please, stop using Bing Maps Aerial, it is not geolocated correctly. Use instead Esri Clarity. Thank you
Fra00 (2022-08-14 08:24:34+00:00): Moreover, the description you use for your edits ("This is country...") is not what it should be. You should describe what changes you are making on the map, not the reason behind your contribution.
Genu29 (2022-08-14 08:33:19+00:00): OK, I will do from next time.
Genu29 (2022-08-14 08:33:42+00:00): Hello Fra00, I will do but when I tried Esri Claity didn't seem to me to be better.
Fra00 (2022-08-14 08:37:07+00:00): The thing about Bing is that it might be more up to date, but is not correctly alligned with real buildings and street.
Fra00 (2022-08-14 08:38:47+00:00): What you also need to be careful about in small villages like this is that buildings do not have to be aligned with their roofs, but with their base on the ground.
marczoutendijk_repair (2022-08-13 15:26:33+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 124857586 where the changeset comment is: DWG revert due to vandalism.
BasicMaster18 (2022-08-13 13:31:14+00:00): Und Position Feuerwehr korrigiert
Cascafico (2022-08-18 10:13:04+00:00): Ciao. Che fonte hai usato per definire ex nsa 344?
fabiotofy (2022-08-18 11:24:03+00:00): Ciao, se vedi ci sono già tutti i tag che definiscono la vecchia numerazione delle strade che hai appena modificato (old_ref). Adesso quel tratto è stato promosso da ANAS ad AUTOSTRADA e gli hanno attribuito il codice "A". Come anche confermato dalle tabelle chilometriche ed ettometriche presenti sul posto.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124853519
Cascafico (2022-08-19 12:10:44+00:00): Direi che si può fare un revert, a meno che l'autore non risponda in una paio di giorni
alessandrocarmeli (2022-08-19 16:14:44+00:00): not corrected
redd (2022-08-17 20:44:31+00:00): Hallo jenskroener,
vielen Dank für deine fleißigen Beiträge zu OpenStreetMap. Es wäre gut, wenn du noch bessere Änderungskommentare hinterlegst und am besten immer mit Quellenangabe arbeitest. Mit "kleine Anpassungen" wird es schwierig zu prüfen, was der tatsächliche Hintergrund der Änderung war. 
Hast du die note "Nutzung als Wasserturm beendet. Turm ist zugänglich während der Öffnungszeiten der Gartenwirtschaft." nur grammatikalisch korrigiert oder auch inhaltlich geprüft?

Laut Stuttgarter Zeitung ist der Zugang seit 2018 gesperrt, siehe https://www.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/inhalt.neueroeffnung-in-boeblingen-biergarten-mit-nahezu-perfekter-aussicht.d90d23f5-0749-4397-883d-fe0cbcee30d8.html

Vielen Dank,
jenskroener (2022-08-17 21:33:07+00:00): Hallo redd,
Ja sorry, da geb ich dir recht. Ich hatte nur einen kleinen Schreibfehler korrigiert. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/283935880/history#map=19/48.68796/9.03373&layers=N
Habe jetzt mehrere verschiedene Jahreszahlen gefunden, scheint tatsächlich geschlossen zu sein. Aber das checke ich gerne wenn ich das nächste Mal in der Nähe bin.
Viele Grüße
redd (2022-08-17 21:46:42+00:00): danke für die schnelle Rückmeldung. Habe die Notiz und die Erfassung als Aussichtspunkt mal entfernt.
jenskroener (2022-08-17 21:51:04+00:00): Top, danke
eggie (2022-08-16 11:11:41+00:00): En je verwijdert weer een bijdrage van een andere mapper..
Neem dan eerst contact op met voorgaande mapper Leo Slager.
Deze changeset wordt teruggedraaid.
MVG
eggie
eggie (2022-08-16 11:32:47+00:00): Reverted by changeset #124966855
Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust.
Je kunt met Leo natuurlijk ook overleggen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121648218
Groet
eggie
spughetti (2022-08-16 12:56:37+00:00): Is het wel nodig om voor deze kleine details contact op te nemen met andere mappers?
eggie (2022-08-16 13:35:18+00:00): Het bos is trouwens van medemapper Padvinder zie ik nu
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/121629489

Leo heeft alleen iets aangepast.

Maar als het een bos is dan is het een bos. 
Het is in ieder geval geen gras. 

Wanneer iets echt fout is verbeter ik gewoon. Dat geef ik dan door aan de voorgaande mapper als hij/zij nog actief is.. Anders niet.
Je zou het evet wat netter kunnen leggen hier, bv al die 'gekke'hoeken eraf. maar het is een bos..


Mapper Padvinder is weliswaar een tepasenonpas bosmapper... Wat geen bos is haal ik dan gewoon weg, maar in dit geval zou je het kunnen laten staan. :)

Als je het bos netter legt hoef je niet te overleggen met padvinder. :)

Up to you.. 

Groet
eggie
spughetti (2022-08-16 15:20:22+00:00): 😸👍
eggie (2022-08-13 14:47:41+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 


MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-08-13 14:52:29+00:00): Dag AFG

Je vraagt feedback.. Wellicht access=private op het wegennet?

MVG
eggie
Patr1k_P (2022-08-15 09:57:18+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/7900415331

opisne nazvy ako naucne tabule do osm nedavame, len skutocne nazvy alebo vacsinou kde je tabulka s nazvom
BAK365 (2023-01-20 14:53:35+00:00): Hallo, ich habe die vorige Version - die mit der Furt - wiederhergestellt,  in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/131511426. Es gibt hier keine Brücke.
LG, und happy mapping. BAK365
ChristianA (2022-08-19 10:52:12+00:00): Den hade jag missat, bra där!