piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
viloan (2018-12-25 18:25:38+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
freebeer (2019-01-11 04:09:27+00:00): howdy,
at the north end of this changeset you were the last to edit the MacDill afb  outline.

this is conflicting as one of two MP members, the other being https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/106962631 which is the former shared fence with  the substation.

at present https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/506238458 takes a different path beyond the mapped fence and includes the above section of fence as well, probably complete by itself.

what do you think is best for relation https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1789629 - re-use more of the fence, or turn the MP into a single closed way?

i can't figure out with the deeep history inspector where the substation fence got incorporated as it insists on showing the centre regardless of zoom, unless i'm holding it wrong.

thanquez
b-jazz (2019-01-11 19:08:57+00:00): As far as I can tell, that 2nd member of the relation is unneeded as it includes 4 nodes that are already included in the larger (158 node) way. I'd say remove the short way, delete the relation and let that long way stand alone.
freebeer (2019-01-24 15:59:38+00:00): done, save for deleting the relation as this appears not trivial with my selected editors.

for that reason i have been leaving a trail of devastation across north america upon encountering simple b0rked multipolygons, either leaving a multiple-member relation where no relationship is useful and a single polygon would suffice, or relations with a single member.

i don't know how trivial it is to automatically detect either, as i try to understand the thinking behind even bothering with a relation in the first place, as often as i see them being broken.
combloop (2018-12-25 18:44:01+00:00): Whoops, I meant Paramus.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65766206
mavl (2018-12-26 06:36:49+00:00): Здравствуйте. Этот пакет правок удаляет некоторые данные. Напишите, пожалуйста, почему были удалены эти два дома:  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325191229/history  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325191867/history
regina315 (2018-12-26 14:45:03+00:00): оба здания были нанесены на карту не корректно- не в том месте.
mavl (2018-12-26 17:00:52+00:00): Вы удалили дом № 85 по улице Карла Маркса  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/325191229/history  

и добавили новый в 25 метрах от него.  
  
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657955592  
  
Почему нельзя было просто сдвинуть дом на 25 метров?
regina315 (2018-12-26 18:02:59+00:00): просто мне так удобней, но если это не правильно, то в следующий раз буду двигать.
mavl (2018-12-27 05:15:09+00:00): Не то, чтобы это совсем неправильно. Просто рекомендуется редактировать существующие объекты, а не удалять и создавать их заново.  
  
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/RU:%D0%A5%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%BE%D1%88%D0%B8%D0%B9_%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%BB%D1%8C  
  
И если не секрет, из какого источника вы берёте адресные данные?
regina315 (2019-01-06 12:28:22+00:00): спасибо, буду редактировать. данные заношу после обхода улиц.
iWowik (2019-11-23 19:00:46+00:00): Здравствуйте regina315!
За один только февраль вы внесли 5660 адресов, если на обход одного домика тратить по одной минуте, то это получится по 3 часа с четвертью ежедневно без выходных.
Или вы лукавите, или вы себя просто не  бережете.
Fischkopp0815 (2018-12-26 06:13:34+00:00): Der Name ist nicht der Name sondern eine Mischung aus Beschreibung (description=Pfadfindergelände VCP Heide am Hochfelder Weg) und Betreiber (operator=Verband christlicher Pfadfinderinnen und Pfadfinder) verwendet.Als Muster bitte mal die Pfadfinder in Meldorf ansehen.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5253681616#map=18/54.09729/9.07008&layers=D

Wie kommt man denn zu dem Gelände? Die Zuwegung fehlt.
TrueJanus (2019-03-25 19:34:17+00:00): Hey, was the removal of public_transport:version from 'Bus 463: Angermünde, Bahnhof => Oderberg, Museum (8301755)' intended? According to the JOSM Checker, it should be there
johndoe (2019-03-28 14:32:28+00:00): Sorry, ptv2 re-inserted
kreuzschnabel (2019-01-08 16:49:26+00:00): Ist als Rad-/Fußweg aber noch da, halt abgepollert. Hab ihn mal wiederbelebt und in hw=path geändert. Autofahrer sind nicht die einzigen OSM-Nutzer :)
mattsches (2019-01-08 16:59:12+00:00): Passt!
Hb- (2021-08-31 14:01:54+00:00): Hiermit wurden die Weiler Wendisch-Börgitz und Wilhelmseiche gesetzt und vermutlich vertauscht. Das vormalige Vorwerk Wendisch-Börgitz lag direkt an der alten Eisenbahn, also westlich von Wilhelmseiche.
korsi (2021-09-01 17:01:34+00:00): Auf den alten Meßtischblättern liegt Wendisch Börgitz offenbar nördlich von Wilhelmseiche:
http://www.susudata.de/messtisch/tk25.html?lat=52.545408&lng=11.620617&opa=1&zoom=15&baselayer=Open%20Street%20Map&overlays=tk25%2C&marker=
https://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/digital/collection/GermanyMaps/id/740/rec/1

Im Webatlas des BKG stehen die Ortsnamen wie dereinst von mir gemappt:
http://sg.geodatenzentrum.de/web_dop_viewer/viewer.html#lat=52.5456&lon=11.6156&zoom=15&webatlasde=true&dop40=false&layer_4=false&layer_3=false&layer_2=false&layer_1=false

Was nun richtig ist, weiß ich nicht; ich war länger nicht da, und komme dort wohl auch so bald nicht mehr lang...
Hb- (2021-09-02 12:48:30+00:00): Die Karte von 1942 weist eine "Kolonie Wilhelmseiche" in der Nähe der heutigen Straße nach.

In der Aufnahme von 1858 ist nichts zwischen dem Vorwerk und Börgitz: http://www.deutschefotothek.de/documents/obj/71053407/df_dk_0010001_3435

Die Umweltschützer kommen beim Vorwerk/Krankenhaus Wilhelmshof und der Siedlung/Kolonie Wilhelmseiche schon innerhalb eines Aufsatzes ins Schleudern: https://lau.sachsen-anhalt.de/naturschutz/schutzgebiete-nach-landesrecht/landschaftsschutzgebiet-lsg/lsg10/

Zumindest der heutige Zustand scheint korrekt wiedergegeben.
Pikse (2019-01-01 17:18:24+00:00): Siin on millegipärast suurem osa Ülenurme tänava relatsioonist kaotsi läinud. Maa-ameti järgi ulatuvad vastav liikluspind ja teeregistri tee katkematult (sh osaliselt ainult rattatee) Aardla tänavast hooneni aadressil Ülenurme tn 31.

Peale selle, OSM-i viki järgi pigem ei peaks rattateed eraldi joonena kaardistama, kui see see pole ülejäänud teest lahus. Vastavate Ülenurme tänava lõikude ulatuses ennist nii oligi.
4004 (2018-12-27 13:32:27+00:00): здравствуйте и спасибо за обновление карты.
два примечания:
1) подьезды отмечаем как entrance=staircase (потому что вход на лестницу, но это не так важно) и главное access=private, потому что нужен ключ
2) что за тип здания такой интересный, conv?
Rich1234 (2018-12-26 06:04:44+00:00): The tag tourism=apartment is *NOT* the correct tag to use for this node.  See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism=apartment.

For an actual apartment, the proper tag would be building=apartments (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dapartments).  

You have been informed of both of the above issues with your edits multiple times in the past, and yet you continue to create the identical errors.  Why do you not correct your methods so that you stop making these errors?

If what you wish to add to OSM is a missing address value, you should simply add a node tagged with addr:street and addr:housenumber.  You should leave off the wholly incorrect tourism=apartment tag and just add the two address tags that hold address values.
mueschel (2018-12-29 16:41:44+00:00): Hi,
instead of "width:maximum" (which is a tag that is not used in other places), you can use 
width:start and width:end to mark the width at the start and end of the way.

Jan
maraf24 (2019-01-02 21:06:30+00:00): For that I need to know where is start (i.e. minimum) and where is end. But original tagging was just "width=11.7-14.4".
Jakka (2018-12-26 09:47:43+00:00): Thx Tip:voor toevoegen gebouwen. Beste manier is laag GRB gebruiken we tekenen enkel het grondcontact. Met nazicht luchtfoto AGIV Flanders most recent aerial imagery of gebouwen er nog zo uitzien.  Muren die tegen elkaar aanleunen moeten vastgeklikt zijn. Nooit overlappen.
Jakka (2018-12-26 09:50:06+00:00): PS lokale kennis is belangrijk. De hulplagen zijn ook niet de recentste ;)
DP24PH (2021-05-14 06:32:56+00:00): Hello! This is Paul from Dasmariñas City, Republic of the Philippines, and upon news of the Colonial Pipeline Hacking Disaster (causing the State of Emergency declaration), this requires thorough mapping collaboration as the current gasoline crisis in your area may affect transportation as well. If you have any queries, don't hesitate to DM thru the official DP24PH OSM page.
whb (2018-12-26 09:52:10+00:00): Diese hinzugefügte Verbindung existiert nicht, denn das ist eine Tiefgaragenausfahrt.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6162075859
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/FDz5qlqSvZvwsIt8jXc3qw
FvGordon (2018-12-26 15:04:47+00:00): Habe die Verbindung zwischen Tiefgaragenausfahrt und dem Fuß-/Radweg wieder entfernt und einen Tunnel ergänzt.
Piskvor (2019-01-02 12:13:53+00:00): Good catch, thanks: the US embassy is indeed elsewhere in the city. Updated in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/65956426
SomeoneElse (2019-01-07 19:52:31+00:00): Thanks
Jakka (2018-12-26 10:02:37+00:00): je gebouw staat boven op een weg ? Bestaat die weg nog ?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657976464#map=18/51.01146/3.96850&layers=N
mavl (2018-12-26 14:05:48+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65785570 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: spam, damage].
TripleBee (2018-12-27 17:26:26+00:00): Thank you for that. I would have done it, but I did not know where to start ;-).
ent8r (2018-12-27 17:51:38+00:00): No problem! It's great that I could help :)
CloCkWeRX (2018-12-26 04:17:46+00:00): Might want to turn this one into a relation, it's 4x parks spread out over a large area.

http://www.friendsofparkssa.org.au/members-directory/friends-of-kenneth-stirling has context.

Burdett's Scrub is one part (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/92029854); I think this one is "Filsell Hill"); there's another "Wotton's Scrub", and I haven't surveyed "White's Scrub"(?)
TheSwavu (2018-12-26 04:35:09+00:00): Don't understand the point you are making. It already is a relation with six separate areas. This is based on https://data.sa.gov.au/data/dataset/conservation-reserve-boundaries from about a week ago. Are you saying that they have changed it since then?
TheSwavu (2018-12-26 05:25:24+00:00): OK. Think I've worked out how the problem happened. These are tagged landuse=conservation which is pretty uncommon. I'm going to have to go back and review all of the parks I've put in and check to make sure that they are not duplicates.

I don't know what the best way of tagging the part names would be. As far as I can tell from searching the sa.gov.au is that they refer to the such-and-such in Kenneth Stirling Conservation Park or the such-and-such unit of Kenneth Stirling Conservation Park. Other people seem to just use the term "Filsell Hill" or "Wottons Scrub". Maybe the way to go is locality names?
CloCkWeRX (2018-12-26 22:11:46+00:00): Yeah, its really inconsistently signed - on the ground, some are dual signed; others only have the "XYZ Scrub" component, though I haven't been to all.

I went for "Kenneth Stirling Conservation Park - (subcomponent)" in other cases, seemed like the least worst and reflected most of the on the ground signage.
PT-53 (2018-12-26 09:51:05+00:00): Hallo JaNö,
Du hast dieses Gebäude https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/657987473 und den Namen Landmetzgerei ESSHANDWERK eingetragen.
Wenn das eine Metzgerei ist, wo Fleisch- und Wurtwaren verkauft werden, sollten noch das Attribut shop=butcher ergänzt werden.
Wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:shop%3Dbutcher
Grüße
viloan (2018-12-25 22:39:34+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
mavl (2018-12-26 14:05:55+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 65785570 where the changeset comment is: The changesets are reverted [Reason: spam, damage].
geoaria (2019-02-26 16:19:11+00:00): در هنگام عبور دو مسیر از روی هم چه سواره و چه پیاده حتما ، نوع تقاطع را مشخص کنید اگر رو گذر یا زیر گذر نمی باشد حتما یک تقاطع ایجاد کنید در اینجا پیاده رو ها را به مسیر خیابان متصل نکرده بودید.   اکثر اصلاح کردم
daganzdaanda (2018-12-25 23:50:06+00:00): Hi CBu201, 
 
thanks for your addition to the map!
Tto mark the crest of a dyke, the tag https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Ddyke is best. I haven't checked if the NL community has some local special rules for dykes. 
 
Please remove natural=coastline from your added way - this is only for the current coastlines. Also the name on the one end will not be necessary, you can put it on the way to give the name of the dyke.
Supaplex (2019-02-06 14:43:11+00:00): 恭喜您透過 Maps.Me 完成第一次的地圖編輯！ 歡迎加入開放街圖，群眾共同參與，繪製生活週遭大家關心事物的共編地圖。Maps.Me App 採用開放街圖的地理資料，由社群而非商業公司建置的地理資料庫。以下是相關的參考資料，歡迎隨時指教與提問。

編輯須知
台灣的標示依循準則可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Taiwan
常見的圖徵標示方式可參考 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Zh-hant:Map_Features
給Pokemon Go玩家的建議：https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tips_for_new_(Pokemon_Go)_mappers

由於Maps.Me隨著軟體更新更新最新地圖，App裡的地圖資料版本可能略舊，透過Maps.Me增添商家等資料時有可能開放街圖上已經有了，請到http://www.osm.org 網站看是否要加的商家有沒有人加上去了。

台灣社群網站
台灣 OpenStreetMap 網站 http://www.openstreetmap.tw
臉書粉絲頁OpenStreetMap台灣 https://www.facebook.com/opestreetmaptaiwan/
台灣社群Facebook社團 https://www.facebook.com/groups/OpenStreetMap.TW/
郵件論壇 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-tw
Telegram OpenStreetMap Taiwan https://t.me/joinchat/Aqu2IgnTuIidMfREdNmomQ
Telegram OpenStreetMap Asia  https://t.me/OpenStreetMapAsia
Slack https://osm-tw.signup.team/

Happy Mapping!
ma-rt-in (2022-06-22 14:25:48+00:00): Hallo,

aus welchem Grund hast du an den Straße foot=no erfasst? Ist das begehen der Straße etwa verboten?

vg
SirKingIke (2022-06-23 06:04:39+00:00): Moin,
Da hier die entsprechenden Gehwege am vorhanden sind, ist das laufen auf der Straße verboten (siehe 25 StVO).
Oder wird diese Regelung nicht so getaggt?
Grüße
ma-rt-in (2022-06-23 17:02:48+00:00): Hallo,

ja das stimmt, nur leider benötigt es in OSM dafür Z259. Wenn du 25 StVO abbilden möchtest verwende foot=use_sidepath. Denn Zu 25 StVO sei gesagt, sobald der Weg nicht mehr in Ordnung ist bzw. du sperrige Gegenstände dabei hast, musst du wieder die Fahrbahn benutzen.

vg
b-jazz (2018-12-27 18:40:53+00:00): Hi Nate_T, 
I replaced https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/5359363756 since it got moved in such a way that the fairway became an invalid polygon (intersected itself). I also moved the park boundary, because it looked invalid both before and after the change. Is that an area you know well enough that you can fix up the boundary? It cross a lot of things that I'm guessing shouldn't be crossed (like a putting green).
Thanks!
Nate_T (2018-12-28 07:23:48+00:00): Oops, thanks for fairway.

By park boundary do you mean the boundary of the golf course? It looks like that polygon got split. 

The golf club now owns most of the land west around Berckmans Road, so maybe I should include that in the boundary. Though most of it is used for parking, they’re using some for course expansions and I’m not sure the lines are now. Suggestions?
Nate_T (2018-12-28 07:29:27+00:00): *thanks for fixing the fairway
b-jazz (2018-12-28 19:00:50+00:00): Sure thing, no problem. The area named "Masters Practice Facility" (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/555492830) cuts through a putting green (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/107617363) which I'm guessing is not correct. Either it is included in the practice facility, or isn't, but not halfway. I'm not sure how else it might be off, but that struck me as incorrect.
Nate_T (2018-12-28 21:53:02+00:00): Ah, I see. I noticed it was a little off but I’m not sure how it’s supposed to be. I’ll see if I can find a good source of information on this.
alexey_zakharenkov (2019-02-19 13:54:26+00:00): Здравствуйте. Что вы хотели тут изменить? Здание сложной геометрии оказалось полностью разрушено. Лучше не подходить к таким объектам с редактором ID. Откатываю.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65773062
besgeo (2019-02-20 10:31:12+00:00): Я только хотел открыть замурованные внутренние дворики...
besgeo (2019-02-20 10:32:12+00:00): Над ними ведь нет крыши.
azakh-world (2019-02-20 10:53:36+00:00): Над ними и так не было крыши, разве нет? Если какой-то рендер рисует двор замурованным, это ещё не значит, что в ОСМ что-то неправильно. В чём смотрели?
Всё равно, там практически все линии входят в отношения - мультиполигоны, и если что-то с ними делать, надо следить, чтобы отношения не поломались. Я точно видел нарушенные мультиполигоны после вашей правки.
besgeo (2019-02-20 11:28:58+00:00): В браузере я смотрел. После отката они снова закрываются.
azakh-world (2019-02-20 11:55:30+00:00): Видимо, не все тайлы перерисовались, надо подождать. А пока почему бы не продолжить осваивать JOSM и не потренироваться на более простых мультиполигонах ;)
besgeo (2019-02-20 12:01:04+00:00): Я тренируюсь. тренируюсь...
azakh-world (2019-02-20 12:07:08+00:00): Пока посмотрите, как это здание выглядело в течение почти двух месяцев (там тоже не мгновенно применяются изменения)
https://demo.f4map.com/#lat=55.7568002&lon=37.6168357&zoom=18
besgeo (2019-02-20 13:08:14+00:00): Да... Нехорошо получилось. Я, к сожалению, не занимаюсь 3D моделированием. А корректировка все же нужна, чтобы и в 2D было хорошо.
alexey_zakharenkov (2019-02-20 15:16:38+00:00): Среднее отверстие и так является двориком, а крайние нарисованы так, как будто там 4 этажа. У вас есть план или хороший снимок, из которого точно следовало бы, что все "дворики" находятся на уровне земли?
besgeo (2019-02-20 16:32:55+00:00): Прикольно. Плана нет, но судя по снимкам из космоса средний и нижний дворики на одном уровне и он выше уровня земли.(См длину тени юго-восточного крыла во дворы в сравнении с тенью северо-западного крыла на ул. Охотный ряд)
Про верхний дворик сказать труднее, там этажность ниже. Но газоны-то из космоса видны.
В 2ГИСе все дворы "замурованы".
besgeo (2019-02-20 17:49:13+00:00): Да и газоны ли это? В крайних дворах больше похожи на световые фонари перекрытий...
besgeo (2019-02-20 18:03:05+00:00): А в центральном - трубы вентиляции. Крыши это. И никаких газонов.
Frans S (2018-12-26 09:45:14+00:00): Hello Satrio Something weird.
you have mapped buildings. today at 6.20 and at 9.00 exact the same buildings. so the all are duplicated. see changeset 65777093.
so we have to correct this.  Please make also use of the building tool in JOSM.
Thanks
chachafish (2018-12-27 12:42:35+00:00): Hello, thank you for your additions to the map. The proposed road you added here popped up as an error. The tagging should be: highway=proposed and proposed=residential. You can see this in the wiki: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dproposed

Thanks :)
nevw (2018-12-26 10:19:50+00:00): Hi 
you appear to have located this business in someone's swimming pool.
Please relocate your business to the building you operate your business from and use the normal address tags. 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
nevw (2018-12-27 23:19:18+00:00): I have reverted this edit as business listing mapped not mapped over building and appears by tags to be online precence only.
nevw (2018-12-26 10:26:37+00:00): Hi again
you seem to have mapped a second copy of the same business, this time between residential buildings. You need to map your business over the building you operate
from.
nevw (2018-12-27 23:21:40+00:00): I have reverted this as not mapped over building and appears by tags to be online precence only.
Adityo (2018-12-26 06:34:33+00:00): Hi, please use this link if you want to help mapping this area:
http://tasks.openstreetmap.id/project/361#

otherwise, it will overlap with other user. Thanks!
nevw (2018-12-26 10:33:56+00:00): Hi
I reverted your edit as you seem to have accidentally used the Noosa Heads placename to advertise your business. You need to add your business to the building that you operate from instead of using a placename location node.
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:addr
BeKri (2018-12-27 22:48:33+00:00): Servus,
PLZ Amstetten ev. falsch ?
73340 statt 74679
Gruss der BeKri
fx99 (2018-12-28 05:27:35+00:00): Danke für den Hinweis. Kommt von falschem Copy-Paste. Habe 92x korrigiert.
LG fx99
viloan (2018-12-26 06:43:42+00:00): Bem-vindo(a) ao OpenStreetMap e parabéns pela sua primeira edição! :-)

Temos um portal brasileiro sobre o OpenStreetMap, com várias informações úteis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Brasil

Enquanto você está se acostumando com o OpenStreetMap, é recomendado que sempre pergunte aos usuários mais experientes antes de remover ou modificar objetos do mapa, especialmente aqueles que são aparentemente "estranhos" ou "fora do lugar".

Além disso, pedimos que não copie dados de mapas proprietários (como nomes de ruas do Google Maps, por exemplo) e que mapeie apenas o que existe na realidade.

Se você está mapeando por causa do Pokémon, dê uma olhada em https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/12/01/dicas-para-novos-mapeadores-pokemon-go/?lang=pt-pt

Se tiver qualquer tipo de dúvida você pode entrar em contato com a comunidade brasileira através de algum dos canais disponíveis em https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pt:Contact
O canal "Comunidade" do Telegram costuma ser o mais movimentado.

Abraço e boa diversão com suas edições!
eggie (2018-12-26 09:57:30+00:00): Hoi timoline.. Het jaagpad staat in deze edit nog steeds op contruction=residential. Is dat de bedoeling?
MVG,
Eggie
eggie (2018-12-26 09:57:49+00:00): Dit was je edit https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=65775872
user_7138056 (2018-12-26 10:13:33+00:00): Hoi,
nee, ik dacht dat ik dat ook had aangepast?

mvg
eggie (2018-12-26 10:18:09+00:00): Nee.. je moet construction=residential nog even weghalen ter hoogte van nr 2.
user_7138056 (2018-12-26 10:24:37+00:00): Ok done.....denk ik :-)
eggie (2018-12-26 10:40:56+00:00): Top!.. en ik denk dat residential ook beter is.
Groet,
Eggie