piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
sanchi (2020-04-21 16:20:33+00:00): Buenas MultiDavid2001b o Castilla2001b como quieras llamarte.

Te han metido un pequeño bloqueo pero por ello no tienes que crearte otra cuenta. Con leerlo es suficiente. Y se te desbloquea mientras no vuelvas a no seguir las 4 reglas básicas.

Primero la descripción no es poner la fecha de la edición eso ya se sabe. Es describir qué es lo que has editado. Ejemplo. Añadidos caminos que faltaban. Creo que no es mucho pedir y fácil de realizar. Lo hacemos todos sin problema alguno.

Volvemos a la misma con los muros de contención. Las parcelas tienen muros normales no contienen nada. ¿Porque te empeñas en etiquetarlo mal aunque se te diga?

Los cursos de agua no tienen que compartir nodos con cualquier vía con la que se cruzan. Solo si están unidos realmente. Normalmente tendrán o un puente o un túnel y no estarán unidos.

Ya te digo que cambiar de usuario no te va a servir de nada. Las ediciones se tienen controladas sean del usuario que sean. Te pido que hagas las cosas bien. Es un mapa que se usa en muchos sitios, no es un juguete. Si no lo haces bien cómo se va hacer en este conjunto de cambios se revertirá directamente como ya te he dicho en el pasado. Y si sigues haciendo mal las cosas habra que volver avisar para que te bloqueen la cuenta.

Te pido que edites correctamente y colabores porque estoy seguro de que información valiosa puedes proporcionar.

Saludos.
trigpoint (2020-04-21 18:47:27+00:00): Hi, welcome to OSM.
In OSM we only add thing that are verifiable and what you have added are meaning less doodles.
I have reverted this changeset.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 13:46:47+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 11021457 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 14:24:08+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021469
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 15:41:47+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021462
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 18:49:34+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021466
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 18:53:50+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021467
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 19:13:46+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021461
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 22:05:10+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021464
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 23:58:50+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021460
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-03 00:28:28+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021468
marc__marc (2022-08-27 10:57:06+00:00): Bonjour,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794456148
qu'avez-vous voulu dire avec surface=no ?
Cordialement,
Marc
azsr (2020-04-21 17:23:14+00:00): Hey, thanks for contributing. But next time, could you please cross-check against newer imagery? Mapbox, Maxar, and Bing all clearly show the parking aisles. On the other hand, Esri Clarity was captured when there was apparently a game going on in the diamond, so there were many more cars than usual.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83890836
appank (2020-04-23 07:25:15+00:00): Hi,
Thanks for letting me know about the incorrect classification. I've rectified the same and here is the changeset (83982210).
Regards,
appank.
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 13:52:02+00:00): Olá,

a restrição de conversão 11021563 (Proibido retornar / no_u_turn) é uma restrição sinalizada? 

Restrições do tipo proibido retornar são desnecessárias, a menos que estejam sinalizadas em campo.

Restrições desnecessárias criam diversos problemas, como dificuldades de edição dos membros e renderização incorreta de nomes no mapa devido à microsegmentações, entre outros.

Para entender melhor, veja essa discussão sobre o tema:

https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2527

E os alertas logo no inicío da Wiki de restrições de conversão:

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 13:57:34+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021559
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 14:21:37+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021562
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 15:34:33+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021564
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 15:47:21+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11017654
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 19:24:26+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021561
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 20:50:42+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021566
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 21:02:17+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 
11021560
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 22:07:47+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021565
Marcos_Itba_Kaart (2021-05-02 22:26:30+00:00): Olá,

ver também a restrição de conversão 11021570
Nakaner-repair (2020-07-07 07:50:59+00:00): reverted by https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/87639184
Frans S (2020-04-22 13:40:02+00:00): Hello
Thanks for mapping here
A remark.
You tagged paths as footway. 
This tag is mend to be used  by pedestrians, more in urban areas and parks. These here  will be used by all transports except cars.
Please use tag Path
Best regards
Frans S (2020-04-22 13:52:13+00:00): Hi
Another issue
Idea editor shows errors which appears in the mappings. See the righthand menu Issue triangle. red or yellow dot means that there are issues to be solved.
Please solve them before uploading them in future mappings
Thanks
Jacques Lavignotte (2020-04-24 22:29:11+00:00): Bonsoir. Merci de votre première contribution à OpenStreetMap. Vous nous avez demandé de la vérifier. Voici quelques suggestions.

addr:street Route de Mahourat addr:housenumber 1281

Puis pour chacune des activités crééz un (point) que vous  poserez dans le bâtiment.

- Un point pour :UNIPROPRE : Négoce de produits d'entretien professionnels 
- Un pour : CLIC-HYGIENE : site e-commerce de vente en ligne de produits d'entretien 
- Un pour : VALIS CONSEILS : Conseils en Gestion, Organisation et Informatique d'Entreprise
Ces points seront probablement des : office= avec tous les tags fone= website= 
Voyez ici https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:office 
vous y trouverez là du grain à moudre.

Ne répétez *pas* sur les points 
addr:street=* addr:housenumber=* addr:housename=* addr:postcode=* qui restent sur le bâtiment.

Vous *retirerez* ensuite du building les éléments qui sont allés sur les points. 

Si  GROUPE BMAZ  est une marque, voyez le tag brand= 
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:brand

En espérant avoir été clair.

Bonne soirée, Jacques
trigpoint (2020-04-28 17:12:40+00:00): Names restored
zuicz (2020-04-21 17:38:16+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/301643889
To jest "Emerald Office Center", DL Center Point III dopiero się buduje
vrg (2020-04-22 18:32:59+00:00): Z tego co wiem, to DL Invest kupiło ten biurowiec w 2018 roku i nazwa Emerald należąca do poprzedniego właściciela już nie funkcjonuje.
Oto jedno z licznych źródeł:
https://miasto.pro/dl-invest-group-kupuje-bnp-paribas-sprzedaje/
vrg (2020-04-22 18:34:34+00:00): Na stronie inwestora również ten biurowiec funkcjonuje jako DL Center Point III:
http://dlinvest.pl/dl-center-point-iii/
zuicz (2020-04-23 15:29:35+00:00): Fakt, nazwę zmienili w 2017 i 2018 roku
https://miasto.pro/reinhold-center-zmienia-nazwe-i-wlasciciela/
MFlamm (2020-04-22 17:03:04+00:00): Bonjour Romain,
J'ai vu que tu as fait des modifications concernant les aménagements cyclables dans le secteur du Bachet et, malheureusement, tu as fait des erreurs qui font dégrader le calcul d'itinéraires cyclables. 
Je me permets donc de re-insister pour que nous puissions discuter de vive voix de différentes subtilités auxquelles il faut veiller. 
Je serai par exemple disponible demain.
Cordialement, Michael
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 17:48:11+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?
wireguy (2020-04-21 17:40:22+00:00): Welcome to OSM Darion!   It might be easier if you use Mapbox imagery instead of Bing.   Try and imagine the outline of the building as the footprint of the foundation.  Everything should have right angles.  To make that easier, you can press  the 'Q' key to square corners.  I redid the south end of the unnamed street.   That may be a good addition too.   Make some adjustments, and keep mapping!
GinaroZ (2020-05-10 23:40:41+00:00): Why did you add a fixme to this farmyard? https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/203547767/history
trigpoint (2020-04-21 18:48:21+00:00): The middle of a footpath is a bit of an odd place for a pedestrian crossing.
I have reverted this changeset
GOwin (2020-04-22 00:40:25+00:00): Thank you for your contributions to OpenStreetMap , and the #OSMaPaaralan initiative.

I just want to mention a tip: try to also refer to the Maxar imagery when tracing buildings, Bing is really sharp but too old compared to Maxar or ESRI.
pantufla (2020-04-24 18:01:54+00:00): Hola! Muy buenas y bienvenido, gracias por ese granito de arena. Si quieres alguna ayuda más directa tenemos un grupo en Telegram que es donde la comunidad de OSM Venezuela está más activa:  https://t.me/OSMve
Juan Carlos G F (2020-04-21 23:35:54+00:00): Hola.
Te quería informar que la información introducida referente al "Banco Santander" mediante maproulete es incorrecta.

Pues en el preset el brand:wikidata y nombre no concuerdan.
En la medida de lo posible hay que usar el brand español, no el inglés.

Cuando tenga un momento revisaré los errores del conjunto y los corregiré.
En el siguiente mensaje te adjunto la plantilla correcta.

Un saludo.
Juan Carlos G F (2020-04-21 23:35:58+00:00): amenity=bank
brand=Banco Santander
brand:en=Santander Bank
brand:es=Banco Santander
brand:wikidata=Q6496310
brand:wikipedia=es:Banco Santander
name=Banco Santander
name:en=Santander Bank
name:es=Banco Santander
official_name=Santander Group
Hugoren Martinako (2020-04-22 06:07:15+00:00): Sí, perdón, me he confundido de Santader en el nsi. Hay un Banco Santander y un Santander (y alguno más), pero entre esos dos no está especificado cuál es cuál.
De todos modos, aunque hayas revertido el cambio, tengo que volver a pasar la query ya que hice alguna modificación más de otros nodos que no se habían cambiado. Ya me pareció extraño que me apareciesen tantos cambios sabiendo que habías actualizado hace poco.
Juan Carlos G F (2020-04-22 09:40:09+00:00): Vale, por si acaso me apunté los id de los otros nodos. Eran como 45 nodos y 1 vía.

Un saludo.
CurlingMan13 (2023-10-16 18:29:58+00:00): Residential buildings should be mapped as buildings, not landuse.  Also, buildings should be squared.
user_18023081 (2025-07-15 19:19:30+00:00): Well that job was certainly botched.
aweech (2020-04-21 18:19:41+00:00): Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap! I've very confused by your edit. You tagged some areas as farmland, and it doesn't look like those areas are active farms. The farmland tag is meant for crops like vegetables and cereals (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland). Is it just that those farm areas are new? Do you know what crops are being grown?
Andy_Stewart (2020-04-21 19:04:53+00:00): Same thing here I am doing a project on potential and existing pollinator habitats and that isn’t a tag so I went with the closest thing which was farmland
aweech (2020-04-21 20:25:08+00:00): OpenStreepMap is a production dataset and is not to be used in this manner. You might be interested in software like QGIS. I am going to go ahead and revert all of these changes.
Jacques Lavignotte (2020-04-24 21:34:36+00:00): Bonsoir, merci de votre contribution à OpenStreetMap. Vous avez demandé qu'on la vérifie. Probablement au niveau des horaires. Je vous conseille cet outil graphique et sympa :
https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/
Bonne continuation chez OSM. Jacques.
Linkid (2020-04-25 11:40:13+00:00): Arg, j'ai du cocher la case par mégarde. J'utilise souvent YoHours pour les horaires ;).
Merci beaucoup en tout cas pour le commentaire.
pantufla (2020-04-24 18:09:34+00:00): Muy buenas Rodolfo, muchas gracias por ayudarnos en Venezuela. Tenemos un pequeño grupo de Telegram si te quieres sumar: https://t.me/OSMve
pesec (2020-04-23 06:27:58+00:00): Пожалуйста, разделяйте ваши правки на отдельные по населенным пунктам или регионам.
Sowa1980 (2020-05-20 17:47:23+00:00): Привет, сделайте свои правки пожалуйста, более компактными, что бы другие участники могли их просмотреть, доступными средствами, для контроля правок в OSM, по чему они накрывают весь земной шар?
MFlamm (2020-04-22 14:39:55+00:00): Hello, 
Could you please explain me on which source you are basing your deletion of this road?
Michael Flamm
Anonymous Drachus (2020-04-22 19:18:14+00:00): I live here. The city of Geneva has remodeled the whole area around the Gare de Champel.
MFlamm (2020-04-22 19:28:18+00:00): Sorry to insist, but I also know quite well Geneva and I am totally aware that the area has been remodeled (and I assume that the works are still not totally finished, isn't it?). 
So, if you live there, what is the current status of the road works? 
From official data from canton Geneva, there is (or soon will be) a living_street connection between the Plateau de Champel and the rue Michel-Servet. The plans are available her: 
https://www.etat.ge.ch/geoportail/pro/?mapresources=MOBILITE_ESPACE_ROUTIER%2CMOBILITE_SIGNAUX_LUMINEUX%2CMOBILITE
Anonymous Drachus (2020-04-22 19:37:29+00:00): Well, if you believe that physical planters in construction supersede the map published by Geneva, ok. Geneva is panning something here, yes; but what will be the final execution is unknown. In any case the old road as it existed does not exist anymore.
MFlamm (2020-04-22 19:50:02+00:00): OK, thanks for the precisions. But did you know that there are tags that would have allowed to mark the area as "under construction" (see: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:construction)? And there is also the possibility to use the tag "access=no" to indicate that currently no passage is possible... In such cases, it is wiser to keep the old information and to add these tags instead of simply deleting the road. In some time, there will at least be a passage for pedestrians in front of the building. Are you going to take care of updating the map again when the construction is finished?
Kind regards, Michael
Anonymous Drachus (2020-04-22 20:12:15+00:00): The old road is gone. No cars, no parking. I thought the map is to be up to date. No access is misleading as the road is gone. By the way the same applies to the adjacent road “Plateau de Champel”. It’s gone as well. I take you’re advice to enter a pedestrian passage.
Anonymous Drachus (2020-04-22 20:15:40+00:00): As well as the the west side of avenue Alfred Bertrand.
MFlamm (2020-04-22 20:18:48+00:00): Those two streets are currently correctly tagged as pedestrian streets with passage allowed for bicycles. So please do not correct anything there!
Please tag the additional passage as a footway and connect it to the sidewalk on Michel-Servet that now is left unconnected (for pedestrian routers, this breaks the routing...).
MFlamm (2020-04-22 20:27:33+00:00): An additional hint: I am taking care of bicycle related data in order to optimize bicycle route calculation. OSM is used as the source data for most cycling related applications and so it is perfect to have up-to-date information. If you detect anything that is wrong regarding foot or cycleways, do not hesitate to send me a mail and I will take care of the mapping. It is quite tricky to map in a way that routing algorithms find the best routes...
Good night, Michael
MFlamm (2020-06-24 15:17:51+00:00): Hello again,
Having been there yesterday, I noticed that the (expected) living street connection between Avenue de Champel and Rue Michel-Servet is now almost finished and I entered it in OSM.
I hope that this first experience did not deter you to contribute to OSM. 
My hint: for a beginning contributor, it is wiser to only add informations and to leave deletions to more experienced persons ;-)
Best wishes, Michael
nikusha (2020-04-29 14:29:10+00:00): Why did You delete my work?
eggie (2020-04-21 18:38:30+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privébericht.
review.. Lijkt me oke.
MVG,
Eggie
!bm (2020-04-21 21:09:18+00:00): Hallo momalisa, willkommen zu OSM! In dieser Form wäre das kein zulässiger Wert für start_date=*, das laut Landesdenkmalamt *=1928 ist. Ich habe es daher (entsprechend LDA-Angaben) zurückgesetzt auf den vorherigen Wert. Zudem Gebäude verbessert und den Verein davon separiert, um die Übersichtlichkeit zu erhöhen – s. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/83901393 --besteGrüße!bm
aweech (2020-04-21 18:43:46+00:00): Hi,
You added a bunch of parking lots in places that are inaccessible to cars in this edit. What do you mean by this? I haven't been to Plymouth since the lockdown began; did they tear down a bunch of buildings and forests since then?
Andy_Stewart (2020-04-21 19:03:26+00:00): Yeah so the program doesn’t offer the kinds of tags we needed for our edits, I’m doing a project for school and just needed a way to tag it so I could show my class parking lot was as generic as I could find
ChristopherGS (2020-05-15 00:46:24+00:00): Hello MacGolf09! Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I've noticed you've been making a lot of changes recently to golf courses (probably for the game Golf Simulator). I've noticed you have been deleting many features, and re-making some of them. Instead of deleting and remaking, please consider editing the feature to make it more accurate while preserving the history of the object. For example, the two golf=tee that you deleted and re-made could have been moved. The golf=rough that you deleted could be retagged to golf=fairway. Thanks for helping maintain open geographical data!

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dgolf_course
treestryder (2020-05-15 01:19:58+00:00): MacGolf09, if you need any assistance, take a look at the message I sent you through OpenStreetMap and the Lansing Wiki page.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lansing,_Michigan
eggie (2020-04-21 19:26:37+00:00): Loekie.. In dat geval de waterway opsplitsen en dan tag je bij tunnel=culvert met layer=1
Dan heb je een duiker gemapt. 
Gr eggie
eggie (2020-04-21 20:12:19+00:00): typo layer=-1
Loekie1976 (2020-04-22 06:13:03+00:00): Hi Eggie, 

Culvert en -1 gemapped,
eggie (2020-04-22 07:05:49+00:00): Mooi.. Het wordt nog wat daar :)
Beetje "mierenneuken"
Zie wel dat de rest van het open traject ook drain geworden is. "Moet" wellicht waterway=ditch zijn? 
Een drain loopt door een verharde bak of buis. 
Up to you.. 
Gr eggie
Loekie1976 (2020-04-22 09:29:44+00:00): Dit betreft een echt 'overfow' kanaal van de beek.  Dus dan is de drain van toepassing, en deze is meestal verhard volgens de legenda.
An artificial free flow waterway used for carrying superfluous water, usually lined with concrete.
Bij ditch springt de categorie naar sloot en dat is dit ook niet, dus hou het eigenwijs op de huidige situatie.
eggie (2020-04-22 11:05:31+00:00): Top!
Olla_Ko (2020-04-25 13:25:46+00:00): Hi! you re-tagged all the features to the highway=residential. It doesn't seem a valid edit
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83896700
mapman44 (2020-04-21 19:47:40+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_changeset_comments
mapman44 (2020-04-21 19:44:50+00:00): Thanks for adding the houses. Just a tip...you can square up the houses by selecting and pressing the Q key. They'll look much neater. Thanks.
Hightide10 (2020-05-11 20:09:06+00:00): Mapillary
mapman44 (2020-04-21 19:38:41+00:00): Thanks for the name change. Local GIS site spells it Kennerly Center Drive. Can you confirm which is correct? Thanks.
CaptainCultured (2020-04-22 23:09:24+00:00): Yes, it is Kennerly. I fixed it, simple typing error on my part.

Note that the streets in the northwest part of this new neighborhood don't connect yet (Abersham Drive and Eden Avenue) - that's because they're not built yet. I will update once they are, and they connect.
mapman44 (2020-04-22 23:24:11+00:00): Thanks for changing that name. 

The streets that are not yet built should be tagged as highway=construction. Here's the Wiki article that explains it: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dconstruction    Then as they open up you can just change the tags. Thanks.
mapman44 (2020-04-21 19:29:54+00:00): Welcome, Jacobbdoc, and thanks for adding the houses. Just a hint...you can square up the corners by selecting a house and pressing the Q key. Thanks.
OSM_RogerWilco (2020-05-08 14:32:36+00:00): Hallo PinkSquirrel,

warum hast Du die Wiesen- und Weideflächen in eine Parkanlage geändert?

Gruß Roger Wilco
Robert Whittaker (2020-04-25 11:00:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 84100544 where the changeset comment is: Revert changeset 83898001 following consultation with mapper: Unlicensed source was used to add postbox ref=* tags.
Thierry1030 (2020-05-09 02:37:29+00:00): Dag Pieter,
Bij deze een kleine bedenking: 
in de "umap-versie" van OSM viel het me op dat deze paden in het blauw zijn aangegeven: http://umap.openstreetmap.fr/nl/map/potentiele-fietsvoorsorteerstroken_452121#18/50.84631/4.34537

Ik ben gaan kijken bij de tags en ik zag daar staan dat ge zowel bij voetgangers als fietsers "designated" hebt staan.

Er staan effectief geen borden die de toegang tot het park regelen, dus in het extreme geval zouden hier zelfs wagens in mogen; https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/-0rHBhCyURBA5SdJHRKT9g

Maar bon, afgezien hiervan ben ik geneigd te zeggen dat het pad bedoeld is voor voetgangers, dus foot=designated effectief behouden, en dat fietsers toegelaten zijn, maar niet dat ze niet de "norm" zijn hier, dus daarom bicycle=yes ipv designated

Uw gedacht? :-)
Pieter Vander Vennet (2020-05-09 09:47:51+00:00): Hey Thierry,

Bicycle=designated is IDD wat overdreven, maak er maar. yes van
Thierry1030 (2020-05-09 13:35:27+00:00): is aangepast!
!bm (2020-04-21 20:12:31+00:00): Hallo mardiz, wieso "layer=-1" an dem highway? --besteGrüße!bm
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/83898318
mardiz (2020-04-22 06:03:01+00:00): Es war ein Konflikt angezeigt zwischen Vordach und Vorfahrt, ich hatte gewählt, dass die Vorfahrt unter dem Dach ist, vielleicht wäre die Angabe Dach über Vorfahrt richtiger.
Gruß mardiz
*abq* (2020-11-15 15:19:47+00:00): Hi Roberto,
could you please check the helipad?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1376550578
 I guess you moved it from its proper location at the end of the dirt road from Cigogna

Best regards,
Reiner
rojjodo (2020-05-05 16:05:48+00:00): Hello beatpoet, welcome to openstreetmap.
You added way 794534119 (the path from Bishop's Stortford footpath 17 to Hadham Road). I think this path should be tagged as permissive as there are signs at each end of the path explicitly saying that it is not a public area nor a public right of way, and that use of the land is by permission of the council and may be withdrawn at any time. The area is also due for redevelopment soon-ish:-(
Regards, Bob Dean
jj000 (2024-08-26 12:39:11+00:00): Ik zie dat enkele tuinen overlappen met de huizenblokken. Kan je dit corrigeren? Voorbeeld: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/794534967
OttoR (2024-08-27 13:58:18+00:00): Hi Jelle,
Ik ben inmiddels ergens anders bezig op de kaart. Voel je vrij om het aan te passen :-) dat is het mooie van OSM ;-)
Groet,
Otto
czubi (2020-07-28 14:50:21+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/2282429#map=19/51.04811/10.38226&layers=N
czubi (2020-07-28 14:50:36+00:00): ?