piebro/osm-data huggingface dataset:
SzymonH (2022-09-06 17:27:17+00:00): Udało mi się w końcu znaleźć czas i edytowałem relacje autobusowe: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125868411
RafalKrk (2022-09-07 18:09:23+00:00): Super, dzięki za ogarnięcie :)
surveyor54 (2022-09-01 11:17:31+00:00): Hallo Lokalfürst,
die Grenzen der Gemeinde Freigericht u. Hasselroth wurden nach Shapefiles der Hessische Verwaltung für Bodenmanagement und Geoinformation eingepflegt. 

https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/244846749#map=19/50.14808/9.10116

Warum führst du Änderungen am Grenzverlauf durch und löschst Punkte?

Gruß
surveyor54
Lokalfuerst (2022-09-06 04:09:14+00:00): Hallo,

der Grenzverlauf machte an betreffender Stelle eine Zacke, die mir eher wie eine Ungenauigkeit vorkam. 

War wohl nicht so gut und ich sollte so was besser nicht machen.

Wir können das auch zurücksetzen. 

Ich weiss leider nicht wie das geht.

Viele Grüsse
Lokalfuerst
surveyor54 (2022-09-06 17:29:18+00:00): Hi,
schön, dass du dich meldest. 
Der Grenzverlauf ist halt dort so.
Ich korrigiere  es wieder.

Viele Grüße
surveyor54
SomeoneElse (2023-04-09 22:00:44+00:00): Hello,
Has the Whitestonecliffe Inn definitely reopened?  It looked very very shut the last time I walked past...
Best Regards,
Andy
incremental7 (2023-04-09 22:30:02+00:00): The last I heard, a week or so ago, was that it closed in 2019 and still has not re-opened.
SomeoneElse (2023-04-10 10:26:17+00:00): Thanks.  An amenity=pub tag got accidentally re-added to the building in this changeset - I've removed it.  The pub is separately mapped as "disused:amenity=pub" node.
nyampire (2022-09-01 05:18:13+00:00): OSMへようこそ！変更セットをレビューしました。

未舗装の道路、ということで surface=unpaved、は正しいタグが付与されているようです。

ただ、oneway=yes (一方通行) が付与されているのは、少し疑問があります。戻るための道が存在しないので、ここはもしかして一方通行ではなく、「すれ違うことができない」ということを示したいのでしょうか？
それであれば、 oneway=yes のタグは間違いになります。少し詳しく教えていただいてよいでしょうか？
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125618338
Kurochata (2022-09-05 08:08:04+00:00): oneway=yes のタグは入力間違いでした。
訂正します。
nyampire (2022-09-08 05:16:22+00:00): ありがとうございます、よろしくお願いします！
koebenhavn (2022-09-06 21:09:00+00:00): There is no traffic calming (speed table) here anymore. There used to be one but it got flattened out.
osmdees (2022-09-01 05:47:58+00:00): Da ist bei der Bearbeitung was schief gelaufen.  Du hast intersecting ways erzeugt.

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=8.62006&lat=48.23348&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=long_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way%2Clong_ways%2Cways_with_long_segments%2Clong_segments%2Cself_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

LG
Irma IRM-ED (2022-12-14 22:35:42+00:00): Hi  Baconcrisp, Your edit looks awesome, but I need to delete the footway due not exist on the imagery (https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/240742871)
If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.
https://maproulette.org/challenge/30208/task/142908701

Thankyou
Baconcrisp (2022-12-14 22:42:01+00:00): Thank you for the message. The footway I added can be seen in Mapillary from earlier this year: https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-6.2381935&lng=106.60773925333&z=17&focus=photo&dateFrom=2017-01-01&pKey=2262276277255021&x=0.4504154194027907&y=0.5393415307867867&zoom=0. Please let me know if you have any other questions or feedback!
Riyadi IRM-RV (2022-12-15 06:18:56+00:00): hi baconscrisp and irma

this issue intrigued me to join discussion. the link pewu above (irma's said) doesn't match with @baconcrisp did. i think this might this way https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/way/569517949 and irma did some improvement of "service road" not footway. (golf area)

other hand @baconscrip did tag of footway in southern area  https://pewu.github.io/osm-history/#/node/9990970772 and he did exact the mapillary's photos.

am i right? or any suggestion, where's the footway mean @baconscrisp? 

feel free to discuss . cheers
Baconcrisp (2022-12-15 17:04:32+00:00): Riyadi

Thank you for further clarifying this. It appears I removed part of the service way because I confirmed it did not exist in available mapillary imagery. I didn’t correct all of the issues with road which Irma kindly did for me.

As for the footway. I added that based on what I saw in mapillary to help improve routing for pedestrians.

Thank you again for the clarification	 on this. Please feel free to ask any other questions you may have!
Bolobos (2022-08-31 16:39:21+00:00): Bonjour, faites plusieurs modifications avec des localis
Bolobos (2022-08-31 16:41:42+00:00): Bonjour, faites plusieurs modifications par localisation plutot qu'une seule. Make one change by location rather than one large. Merci, thanks. (sorry for the previous message)
Mathias_ADAV (2023-03-27 10:32:19+00:00): 

Abri vélo Domercq ? 350 places en 2018

https://sedeplacer.bordeaux-metropole.fr/Actualites/Decouvrez-les-Parcs-Velos-St-Jean
bxl-forever (2022-09-01 10:43:00+00:00): On this square, every connection on foot is now impossible.  This is because areas are not routable.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090795904

What is the current situation please?
Unless the square is completely barred for works, it seems you might need to add some connectors across the area.
mariotomo (2022-08-31 16:39:23+00:00): sí, sorry, y creo que hay más.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1lwf
mariotomo (2022-08-31 16:52:33+00:00): https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/125620989
VLD521 (2022-10-31 12:45:22+00:00): Thank you very much for your response. I am glad I could help.
otheralan (2022-08-31 20:03:03+00:00): Does this road exists?
RVR015 (2022-09-23 21:13:18+00:00): Hello Kensou023, 

I saw that you had made several edits in this area. Some of these objects that were digitized spelled out a word, a drawing of a Pokemon, and a heart shaped lake. These features were removed as they do not match any available imagery set in OSM. May I ask what you based these edits off of?

Thank you for your time.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:28+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:20+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:22+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
sjakobi (2022-10-13 13:56:38+00:00): Hi! Ich wollte nur mal darauf hinweisen, dass der name-Tag nicht für die botanische Bezeichnung gedacht ist. Siehe https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:natural=tree?uselang=de#Bedeutung_des_Baumes.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:06+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
FennecusZerda (2023-02-28 11:49:23+00:00): Bra jobba! Kun et lite tips, som heller ikke jeg visste om på lenge. Alle bussholdeplasser i Norge er det Entur som legger inn. Hvis du endrer på en busstopp vil den ikke bli oppdatert senere hvis ØKT rapporterer endringer til Entur. Dokumentert her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue/Bus_stop_import_Norway#Updates
ENTUR Johan Wiklund (2023-02-28 13:42:45+00:00): Dette var vel mest oppdatering av tagger, og en knøttliten posisjonsendring. Jeg fikser så den blir autooppdatert fremover også.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:48:56+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:24+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
user_5359 (2022-09-03 06:46:01+00:00): Hello (again!) please have a look on http://www.osm.org/way/1090807390. what is the meaning of the tag Cours d'eau = Riviere?

Bonjour (encore !), jetez un coup d'œil sur http://www.osm.org/way/1090807390. Que signifie le tag Cours d'eau = Rivière ?
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-10-02 05:59:34+00:00): OSM uses local language names in the name key; using English because some people would prefer it to render in Carto is mapping for the renderer. Context for other tags does not work so well otherwise as well, for example, in name:etymology it is assumed etymology of the local name. Ludhiana does not have an English etymology. There is also no Punjabi wiki page documenting any English name consensus, so it is unclear how non-English speakers are supposed to find this information.

Another example, I am working on the Punjabi translation of StreetComplete, which asks users to enter the values on signs. When this is ready, I am not going to ask StreetComplete to implement a special feature asking users to make up an English translation on the spot, because this is not typical on OSM. I do not know where users got this idea that this is OK to do in India and nowhere else.
عثمان ਉਸਮਾਨ bgo_eiu (2022-10-02 06:04:02+00:00): Also note that Punjabi city names can inflect for grammatical case, that is they are expected to change in the context of the sentence. Poland already has implemented this with name:dative and name:genitive; this way more grammatically sophisticated directions can be generated. This is not really possible in English.

There is also the issue of for example, ਨ and ਣ both being represented by N in English. So the name is not really possible to represent as well when the Latin alphabet is not suited for it.
mgerken (2022-09-01 07:27:34+00:00): Hallo 1&2 - Radler, mit dieser Änderung ist jetzt sowohl das Gelände als auch das Haus mit amenity=fire_station getaggt. Die Informationen sind somit doppelt vorhanden. Auch laut https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tag:amenity%3Dfire_station sollte das Gelände als amenity getaggt werden und das Gebäude darauf als building=fire_station
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125622654
1&2 - Radler (2022-09-01 21:56:16+00:00): Hallo mgerken,
vielen Dank für den Hinweis! - Ich habe tatsächlich das Gebäude falsch getaggt (Ich hatte das schon getaggte Gelände völlig übersehen und versucht das unbearbeitete Gebäude als Feuerwehrhaus zu kennzeichnen...).

Nun habe ich das Gebäude vom Objekttyp "Feuerwehrhaus" wieder zu "Gebäude" (Objekttyp) zurückgeändert und den von mir falsch verwendeten Begriff amenity=fire_station zu dem Tag building=fire_station geändert.
Außerdem habe ich den von mir gewählten Namen "Freiwillige Feuerwehr Uesen" für das Haus zu "Feuerwehr Uesen" geändert, damit  es einheitlich mit dem Geländenamen ist, der schon vorher von Raana02 "Feuerwehr Uesen" genannt wurde: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/808725867
Auch wenn das Haus offiziell Ortsfeuerwehr Uesen heißt.

Ich hoffe diesmal stimmen alle Änderungen und nochmal Danke für den Hinweis!
1&2 - Radler
ivanbranco (2022-08-31 20:44:27+00:00): https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dswimming_pool
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:49:26+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
MarkusHD (2022-10-04 18:57:37+00:00): Das war eine etwas merkwürdige Änderung, die scheinbar nichts so wirklich verändert, aber dafür kommentarlos den Hydranten gelöscht hat. Hab sie rückgängig gemacht: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/127010965
abakus_uploader (2022-08-31 22:31:23+00:00): (Wiadomość automatyczna)
Cześć!
Otrzymujesz ten komentarz, ponieważ dodałeś lub zmodyfikowałeś adres, który jest niepełny lub błędny.
Adres powinien zawierać minimum trzy znaczniki: addr:city=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:street=[nazwa_ulicy] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Wyjątkiem są miejscowości bez nazwanych ulic - wtedy stosujemy znaczniki: addr:place=[nazwa_miejscowosci] + addr:housenumber=[numer_porządkowy].
Bez poprawnego oznaczenia adresów, nie będą one brane pod uwagę przez wyszukiwarki, dlatego warto je dostosować do ww. schematu (w zależności od sytuacji).
Więcej informacji na forum: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=5632 - a pytania najlepiej zadawać tu: https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=681873
Pozdrawiamy!
eggie (2022-08-31 19:29:23+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
cheatach (2022-08-31 18:52:01+00:00): cześć, po 1 opisuj swoje zmiany, po 2 to co dodałeś już było na mapie jako budynek. napraw proszę błędy
Seraphus (2022-09-01 20:21:38+00:00): Cześć,
dziękuję za komentarz.
Nie sądziłem, że jest potrzeba jakiegoś dodatkowego komentarza, bo ja nie tyle chciałem coś zmieniać co dodać nowy element, a dokładniej to "dodać organizację" do już istniejącego budynku zdaje się.
Jeśli chodzi o drugi punkt to szczerze mówiąc nie wiem do końca co zrobić. Tak jak napisałem - chciałem dodać organizację do konkretnego budynku (choćby żeby dodać godziny otwarcia i tak dalej), dokładnie tak jak w tym wypadku: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9973652417 .
Sugerujesz, że godziny otwarcia i inne informacje powinny być dodane jako pola w ramach samego "budynku" (nawet jeśli znajduje się tam więcej organizacji)?
cheatach (2022-09-03 03:27:12+00:00): Dodanie czegoś to też zmiana a każda zmiana wymaga komentarza
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Pl:Dobre_praktyki
W obydwu przypadkach dodałeś PUP jako punkt do budynku, który był już jako taki oznaczony, być może nie widziałeś tego z edytorów, których użyłeś, ja ich nie znam. Należało tylko uzupełnić tagi do istniejących budynków, no chyba, że faktycznie w nich mieści się więcej instytucji, wtedy z kolei trzeba by je oznaczyć jako punkty a z budynku jako całości usunąć oznaczenie urzędu pracy, ja nie mam takiego info żeby w tych budynkach było więcej instytucji ale jeśli jesteś tego pewny to ok. Zapraszam na nasze sociale, tam się możesz wszystkiego spytać i dowiedzieć jak mapować
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=23
https://discord.com/channels/783754873861963786/783766269707026483
Mateusz Konieczny (2024-01-29 14:30:31+00:00): Hello!

You used
cuisine=juices
on https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/9991231338/history

Have you maybe meant
cuisine=juice
?

I am pretty sure that it is a typo, but not sure enough to just replace it (I edited some objects where situation seemed more clear to me).

Or have you used this value deliberately? In such case, what was the intended meaning?
kubahahaha (2023-06-05 23:34:18+00:00): Ciekawy błąd się wydarzył.

https://imgur.com/8gowu6E

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?engine=graphhopper_car&route=50.0217%2C19.9325%3B50.0228%2C19.9253
kubahahaha (2023-06-06 10:50:54+00:00): Jak coś - wiem że to nie ty wprowadziłeś ten błąd, tylko chciałem podlinkowane bo dotykałem okolicy
gscholz (2022-09-04 05:25:46+00:00): Hi  KwaXoloXolo,
you recent changesets have created several errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting and overlapping ways:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=31.79531&lat=-25.55493&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=31.79531&lat=-25.55493&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido
archie (2022-09-01 06:45:53+00:00): Why did you insert a hole bunch of not anymore existing highways? All of those streets have been demolished 2 years ago. You also have inserted bridges where there are no bridges. By the way, those fantasy-highways are not to be found on any other updated map anymore. I would describe your various changesets as pure 
vandalism.
archie (2022-09-01 07:23:15+00:00): This is the description of the projekt (http://www5.goteborg.se/prod/fastighetskontoret/etjanst/planobygg.nsf/vyFiler/S%C3%B6rred%20-%20Ombyggnad%20av%20S%C3%B6rredskorsningen-Plan%20-%20samr%C3%A5d-Planbeskrivning/$File/Planbeskrivning.pdf?OpenElement). This illustrates what utterly garbage you have produced again on osm. 
You have inserted fantasy trafiklights, fantasy railwaycrossings, fantasy highways etc.
aleno150 (2022-09-01 07:36:39+00:00): Well if you compare the Göteborg airphotos (OSM) from 2015, 2017 and 2019 the construction are very visible. Even Maxar satelite images shows the new connection. Feel free to change the classification of the roads but there are indead traffic lights at that location.
archie (2022-09-01 07:41:01+00:00): Those are highways long outdated. Bridges not existent etc. It's not about classification of roads, it's about inserting highways which do NOT exist.
archie (2022-09-01 07:44:18+00:00): Not to mention the highway junctions you inserted, which do NOT exist!
archie (2022-09-01 07:46:49+00:00): No map will show these items you inserted in osm in this spot.
aleno150 (2022-09-01 07:47:37+00:00): I guess you didn't compare the areal photos? There is a road crossing before arriving to Volvo that was removed some years ago.
archie (2022-09-01 07:51:27+00:00): You are fantasising. These highways were edited by users much more experienced than you are. Highways and surroundings were ok untill you completly destroyed the place.
archie (2022-09-01 07:57:51+00:00): Why don't you take a ride out there to see what utterly nonsense you have produced here. This is not a slight error, this is garbage.
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:50:34+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
streckenkundler (2023-09-17 16:53:29+00:00): Hei,

Punkt https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/536785282: ist das ein Hydrant oder ist das eine Bushaltestelle?

https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/hydranten-mit-name/103751/65

fragt Sven
SomeoneElse_Revert (2022-10-29 15:51:02+00:00): This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset 128216214 where the changeset comment is: Reverting some 'mechanical' maproulette changes, following https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/6386 and discussion with Expedia.
Hufkratzer (2022-09-02 08:43:11+00:00): Hi, you have removed building=stable from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/871818122 and replaced it with leisure=horse_riding. I am not sure if this was intended because this object looks like a building in bing. Also the horse_riding tag seems inappropriate for such a small area, it is for the whole area of the ranch (see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=horse_ridin), so the area tagged with leisure=horse_ridng should probably at least also contain the stable https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090822981 (or set a node). For riding arenas see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure=pitch#Riding_arena.
bpw85 (2022-09-02 10:02:36+00:00): The "stable" is the new building I added. The existing building is the roofed area where ponies are ridden.
Hufkratzer (2022-09-02 17:52:35+00:00): Then I see 2 possibilities for the old roofed area that could make sense:
* leisure=pitch + sport=equestrian + covered=yes
* building=riding_hall
See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building=riding_hall
Langlaeufer (2022-08-31 20:10:31+00:00): Bist du dir mit beidseitigem Fußweg sicher. Auf dem Bing Luftbild sehe ich nur auf der Nordseite einen Fußweg, den man größtenteils lieber separat zeichnen sollte.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/125624516
Scout Jens (2022-08-31 18:37:54+00:00): Ich denke man kann es so machen. Gibt es einen einfacheren Weg?
Allison P (2022-09-01 05:00:47+00:00): You should not delete "unauthorized" paths, but mark them as access=no. Otherwise another mapper will just readd them and you'll be back at square one.
eggie (2022-08-31 19:35:19+00:00): Welkom bij OpenStreetMap. Ik heb een uitgebreid welkomstbericht met wat handige tips en links gestuurd als privebericht. 

Feedback...  Tip...  Geen persoonlijke informatie aan OSM toevoegen. Dat is eigenlijk niet toegestaan. Wees je er bewust van dat je edits in de hele wereld zichtbaar zijn. 
Dat het een woning is kun je al zien aan de tag building=house
start_date hoort niet op de Kadaster adresnode. 
Je wijziging kan beter teruggedraaid worden 

MVG, 

Eggie 

Namens de OSM Community
eggie (2022-08-31 19:38:18+00:00): Reverted by changeset #125626485

Mocht je nog vragen hebben stel ze gerust. 
MVG
eggie
Đuro Jiří (2022-09-01 12:38:27+00:00): Čau Pavol, všiml jsem že jsi přidal kontejnery na třídění odpad na náměstí (před Terasa a Mare). Tam ale žádný kontejnery nejsou (minimálně před třemi dny,kdy jsem tam byl naposledy,tam nebyly) Tam jsou jenom odpadkové koše, které jsem tam už přidal.
Pavol33 (2022-09-01 13:11:42+00:00): aohj, podla mojich fotiek tam musia byt velke kontajnery, teda v polke augusta boli
Đuro Jiří (2022-09-01 13:15:12+00:00): Ok, za chvilku pojedu do obchodu,tak se tam zájezdu podívat.
PT-53 (2022-09-01 05:23:00+00:00): Hallo osmdees,
nch Deinen Bearbeitungen werden im OSM-Inspector Hinweise auf " Ways without tags" angezeigt:
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=tagging&lon=8.51300&lat=47.94545&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&opacity=0.34&overlays=ways_without_tags

Schaust Du Dir das nochmal an?
Fragende Grüße

PS: 
Für Fragen / Anmerkungen / Rückmeldungen bitte diesen Änderungssatz aufrufen und in das leere Feld unterhalb Diskussion als neuen Kommentar eintragen.
osmdees (2022-09-01 05:26:09+00:00): Klar. Aber genau das hatte ich eigentlich verbessert. Vielleicht ist das nur noch nicht aktualisiert.
osmdees (2022-09-01 05:44:08+00:00): Ich kann nichts finden. Mal abwarten ob es später / Morgen immer noch da ist.
laurent-38 (2022-09-09 13:50:27+00:00): Bonjour Mike,

Merci pour la maintenance de ces itinéraires.

Néanmoins, pourrais-tu éviter de découper les giratoires en plusieurs segments, comme cela a été fait ici : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1090832742 ?

En effet, cela rend difficile la maintenance sur les itinéraires qui l'emprunte. En l'occurrence, ce sont 4 relations qui sont cassées : la via rhona 8, un itinéraire pédestre et 2 itinéraires de bus : la continuité de l'itinéraire est rompue. Et l'éditeur ID n'est pas très bon pour gérer les relations.

Et en général, les itinéraires qui passent par des giratoires complets sont bien gérés par les applications de guidage (OsmAnd, etc…). Il n'y a donc pas lieu de les découper.

Si tu n'y voie pas d'objections, je me propose de « ressouder » ce giratoire. 

Cordialement 
~~
Laurent
Mike_citadin (2022-09-09 19:42:33+00:00): Bonjour Laurent;
Je me suis effectivement rendu compte que j'avais coupé le giratoire pour rien durant cette carto.

Cependant je ne vois pas de continuité rompue.  Le bus T20 par exemple fait toujours le tour du rd point pour se retourner.

Mickael